Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980 11-20 City Council Packet�z V� AGENDA Maplewood City Council 7:30 P.M., Thursday, November 20, 1980 Municipal Administration Building Meeting 80 - 29 (A) CALL TO ORDER (B) ROLL CALL (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES - None (D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA (E) CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and w i l l be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion on these items. If discussion is de- sired, that item w i l l be removed from the Consent Agenda and w i l l be con- sidered separately. le Accounts Payable 20 Financing for Gall Avenue F e a s i b i l i t y Study 3. Financing for Beam and Lydia Openings 4, Police Uniform Supplier 5. Budget Transfer: V.E.M. Fund 6. Purchase of Sanders 7, Final Plat: Goff ` s Mapl ev i ew Addition 8. Time Extension: Goff ` s Mapl evi ew Addition 9. Resolution: On and Off Sale Liquor License 10. Temporary Gambling Permit; Northeast Metro Al ano Society, Inc. (E -A) Appointments to Human Relations Commission (F) PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Rezoning: West of Keller Lake, East of Arcade Street (7:30) 20 Ripley Avenue Watermain, West of Edgerton (7:45) 3. PUD: Maple Knoll Development (8:00) 4. Special Use Permit: 1955 Prosperity Rd. (8:15) 5. Special Use Permit Revocation: 1954 Hazelwood (8:30) 6. Rezoning: 763 N. Century Avenue (8:45) 7. Rezoning: North of Roselawn, west of Sloan Place (McDonald's) (9:00) G AWARD OF BIDS 1. Paramedic Vehicles 2. New Police Vehicles H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS is Special Exception: Elm Street and Kohlman. Avenue 20 Code Amendment: Residential Estate Di strict (2nd Reading ) 3. Code Amendment: Double Dwelling (2nd Reading) 4, Connemara Request I) VISITOR PRESENTATION J) � NEW BUSINESS 11 Ordinance: Sewer Rates K COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. (L) ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS (M) ADJOURNMENT CIT CF MA-PLEWOOD A C C 0. U N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 11.20.80 PA GE 1 E-CK A M 0 •U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S E 4 004902 1,540.10 MINK STATE TREASURER D : POSIT S- DEPU7Y RE.GIST. -- 304903 - - - -- 83.00 M INN STATE TREASURER STATE D/L FEES PAYABLE 00+90 120.00 UNIVERSITY CF MINNESOTA TRAVEL + TRAINING 004c05 1, 0c0.00 EMPL0YEE BENEFIT CLAIMS DEPOSITS W /PAYING AGT 00490o !- -_ 32.00 UNIVERSITY CF MINNESOTA TRAVEL + TRAINING 004907 75.00 NATL REGISTRY OF E M T FEES, S ERVICE PARAMEDIC CERTIFICATION 0 0 4908 4 3.00 F AMS Y CO C LERK OF DIST COUNTY D/L FEES PAYABLE COURT ----- - - 004909 1 , 72 810 y M N STATE TREASURER - PERA -- CONTRIB U I Ot�S , P E N X104910 3,62co .36 MN STATE TREASURER-PEFcA P .E.RoA . DED PAYABLE _- ----- . -- - - -- - - - - -- ..____ ----- ____- __.. ------ -------------- .--------- - - - - -- _ -__ ._ - _ __ ..._ - - - -- . - .- - - -- - _._ _ - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - -____ . -... ___- _ A N D � C ON T R I BU T I 0 N S , _ P ER A - 00 4911 T, 5 04.17 Mh STAT E TR EASURER -- P =RA P .E.R.A . OED PAYABLE - . - - --- _ - -_ - .__ __ - _ .._ - -- - -- .. - -- -- - - . - - -- - -- _ - - - -- - . _.... ._... - - - -- -- - .. -- - -- - -- - - - - _ - - - A N D - C O N T R I B U T I O N S , PER A 0 0+912 31.0 M INN STATE TREASURER STATE D/L FEES PAYABLE 00+913 949.50 MINN STATE TREASURER DEPOSIT S- DEPUTY REGIST. fl 04914 - - - -- -- -- 21,21 E 5p - - - - -INti STAT...TREAStlk`R - DEPOSIT S DEPUTY REGIST. 1304915 113.50 M INN S TRE ST 0/L FEES PAYABLE 004916 15000 POSTMASTER POSTAGE - 0 - 04917 ----------- __ 24D� 0 - - - -- - * ` - A T 1. _ tGIST ICY OF E t _ - -- - - - - FEES, SERVICE -- FIRE FIGHTER EXAMINATI C 0 04918 16, 326.00 LARSON EX CAVATING INC AWARDED CONST CONTRACTS 004919 5,152923 MN MUTUAL. LIFE INS CO CONTRIB UT IONS, IN SURANCE o +990 - - - -- - -- 4 ,272.$6 MN MUTUAL " - - LIFE 'INS CO A/R - INS CONTINUANCE AND•NcALTN INS PAYkBLE AND -LIFE INS DED PAYABLE: --- - - - - -- ____---- ------ -_____ _ .____. _____.____---- . - - - - -- ----------- .. - -. - -- - -- _ _ - - . -- - __ .. _ ___ - - - -- - -- - -- ---- - - - - -- _ -w D EN T AL - I N S PAYABLE. { 004927 274940 MICHAZ.OLS RESTAURANT CATEAW 11 4&2..0-80 PA G= 2 C CF MAPLEWOOD A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A B L. E C H E CK* A M 0 U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S E WATER CONNECTION CHGE, 9 -STATE ' TREASURER--'------------'----'"--- 004921 3t154*50 MINN STATE TREASURER DEPOSITS-wCEPUTY REGISTo 004922 97*50 MINN STATE TREASURER STATE D/L FEES PAYABLE N--- - M I N IN G a __0 '4_93 2 0 0 4 924 19008*00 MINN STATE TREASURER DEPOSIT S-*CEPUTY 'EGISTo 3 0 4925 145.00 MINN STAT E TREASURER STATE D/L FEES PAYABLE.- DEPOSITS— REGIST9 --ASSOC ' TRAV;L*-*-'+* TRAINING 004927 274940 MICHAZ.OLS RESTAURANT FEES, SERVICE . .. ......... GALS GETAWAY 11/6/80 004928 49200900 CASTLE 0,-,SIGN+0EVEL0PMNT R F U N 0 WATER CONNECTION CHGE, 9 -STATE ' TREASURER--'------------'----'"--- D .J_ �POSIT S�m DEPUTY R'G'ST* 004930 282*50 MINN STATE TREASUR.O..'R,. STATE D/L FEES PAYAB J 0 4931 103050 RAeS Y CO CLERK OF GIST 4 i COUP TY D/L Fti -ES PAYABL E COURT a __0 '4_93 2 —a-0 -e-00 L- Low - -AU R. E _Ll U ' ' C H A N G ftm 004933 53*28 MENARD CASHWAY LUPBER, MAINTENANCE" MATERIALS 004934 1 MINN STATE TREASURER DEPOSITS— REGIST9 Fci`-.ES 004936 851.77 CCNN GENERAL LIFE INS CO CONTRBUTIONS INSURANCE 004937 300*25 C CNN GE L I F E I NS CO CONTRIB UT I ONS 9 IN SURA NC.E' CS T M AS T E R. P R E A 1 -'*-t'w X P E N S 5 0 0 4 c.39 733*50 MINN STATr`m. TREASURER DAEPOSITS- DEPUTY REGIST* 004940 120 50 MINN STATE TREASURER STATE O/L Ft-,;.:.S PAYABLr'-.- 0 4 941 ----'-680---00 - STATES - - -- PCW'*"t-1,R'-'-'CO'---'---" - -- BUILOING IMP-"'%,40VE-MENT'__.'_ 004942 274*40 MICHAELS RESTAURANT FEES, SERVICE GALS GETAWAY 11/12/80 004943 119101o18 MINN STATE TRE'ASURE.R DEPOSITS- DEPUTY .R.'..GIST* II . ........ A CCO UNT S P AY ABLE DATE itw20m*80 PAGE 3 ^'Pi.EWOOC CITY CF MA H E CK* A M 0 JJ N T C L A I M A N T P U R p 0 s *E - - -- -- -------- ----- - - - - -- - Q 5.00 MINN STATE TREASURER ,-'S PAYABLE STATE. O/L F 0 4 944 004945 14,v 17 J UDY CHLZ'*BZ.CK PETTY CASH AND-- POS TAG' AND-mTRAVEL% TRAINING 004946 2 7 9 3 1 AFSCM.;E LOCAL 2725 UNION DUES PAYABLE ANO FAIR SHAREF EIS PAYS 00 7 45*13 M ETRO SUPERVISORY ASSOC UNION DUES PAYABLE A R E F !-- �- �% PAY; AND-FAIR SN AR E fr.-- L Z� X 1. 4 8 IcmA R.".-TIRt"MENT CCRP YAPi E DEFERRED CCMP PA 6. 00 4945 INCOM TAX PAYAB E , MAN 1.0 6- 0 0 44 9 4 9 ,,,,70 4 0 00 STATE OF MN COMM OF REVENUE F 1 NC`04 0 M E TAX P AYA' BL:. 004 j50 b 52 0 -2 HILLCREST MIDAME'RICA 8,9735950 ION CITY + CTY CREDIT UN" C CROIT UNION OED PAY ABA. %m 0 0 40051 RAGE DirDUCTIONS PAYAELE 00-4952 145 0 0 F Y K A NE .C-S 1- MAR t 401*75 2-0.- HN T.AMSTERS LO L-- UNION DUES PAYABLr' 304953 -.3 123, 330.03 NECESSARY f,,'.oXPEN0ITUR-S SIN00-t L".ST CO UNCIL MEETING 52 N� DATE ii- 20 -80 P AGE CI7Y OF -MAFLEWOOD A C C 0 U A T S P A Y A 8 L i6i C H Em CK* A M 0 U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S- E 007530 1:.34 ACE HAROWARE ---------- SUPPLIESt EQUIPMENT AND ,-oMAI NTENANCE. MATER'li 0 0 7 r,-3 1 18,94079 00 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BONO.*%) PAYABLE AND- BON O ------ AND -OTH ER CHARG S 0 0 7 r.-3 2 E 2 00 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BOND INTEREST _S AND -OTHER CHARG."- 007533 519,326 5­0 AMERICAN NATIONAL B AIN K BONGS PAYABL' AND-m BON D INTEREST AND -OTHER CHARGES 00 753 4 5 0 510 9 6 00 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK B BONOS PAYABLE AND -BOND INTEREST AND -OTHER CHARGES 3 0 7 535 409963900 AMERICAN 14ATICNAL BANK BONDS PAYABLE AND BOND INTEREST A NO - OTH ER CH A '-,G i S 307 E30" 97o00 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK 0TH ER 0 H A R G E.- S T -___ 007 =37 109011 APL-RICAN NATIONAL BANK OTHER CHARGES 3 0 7 =03 3 300.00 --WO-RKS' AS SO '-MKRSH SUBSCRIPTIONS N11" 30 7 ro-39 17. CO ANCHOR SLOLK MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 0'07 40 19377*85 ARNALS AUTO SERVICE R EMP + MA INT VEHICLE. 0 0 7 '50 41--- - - - - -- 8.31 - - ; -- LU C I L__ LE'--- A _U R.c` ''Ll"'l U'S AND- SUPPLIES, OFFICE AND-wPOS TAG "ITY OF-MAPLEWOOD A C C 0 U 4 T S P A Y A B L DATE itw20aw80 PA GE 5 CHECK * A M 0 N T C L A I M A N T p u R P 0 S E. '_AN0_,mSUP PLIES PROGRAM AND-* BOOKS 0 7 542 - - -- - 20. :3 AUTCMAT IV E. INDEX Vb',-.H I0_ SUBSGRI PT IONS +MEMSL-'RSHI P 007543 107. 08 BATTERY + TIRE WH!13!-.� INC SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT VEHICL 307 E-44 38*45 6IRC + CRONIN INC ..-..-REP* + MAINT ov EQUIPVENT 007 45 .1292544ol5 BLUPELS, TREE AND A CONST CONTRZACTS LANDSCAPING - -- -I-- 7.0 1 0 9 B CARD 0 F WA TER---COMM U TI L ITI ES 0 0 7 E47 12 .95 RCBL-.RT 8-R40Y CO BOOKS `. 00748 98990 BRINOLEY COMPANY HVEA T I NG O IL 0 0 7 =4'9' 3 0 -0'3'0 BROWN PHOTO­-----­--­-­­- .. .... S UP P L IE S't _'EQU I PM "CENT 307S50 3 5 CARLSON ;EQUIPMENT CO SLPPLIES9 EQUIPMENT 007.51 r 7*16 :f CASE POWR + EQUIPM'-NT SUPPLH S,9 cOUIPM -NT &W ilo 0"0*7'-.C-52---- -------- 19 -- i -- O ------------ CENTURY CA4 RA___ t PLIES 9­ P-QUIPMENT---- -- 0 07 . 53 r- 2.92 CCAST TO COAST STCM ES' SUP PLIE S, EQU IP M ENT 007 ro: 5 4 55*00 CCNSCLIDATtEC TOURS FEES, SERVICE GALS GETAWAY __117 55 5- PLIzS'-- - - VEHICL ice.-- —.— - - --- - *AM ANOmMAI NTENANCE MATERIA 'SUPPLIES9 JANITORIAL' -3 0 7 5 7 4 2 0 0 0 PAT OALIEY F "C'St S ERVICE - P LB G' SEWER INSPECTION 0 07 5.5 8 29270990PO. DELAHUNT + VOTO Cc FEES, S ERVICE AUDITING ' 0­0­_ 1: 5 9 , 82*50 Al PAID CIAMOND ADIC OR RE E S RAP. + M AINTo VEHICL 007560 19584*11 EASTMAN KODAK CO DUPLICATING COSTS 007 30000 EKBLAD PAROEE+EEWELL INC INSURANCE + BONDS Ci OF,-.MAPLEWOOD A C C 0 U A T S PAY AB Lt'..' OA 7 lom' 11. 20— 80 PA GL 6 ti 00 H E CK A M G . 'U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 s E 0 0 7 6 2 8*75 BARRY EVAN'.'*')'4 TRAVEL + TRAINING 3 07 50,53 4 6 9 15) FARWELL OZMUN -'-kIR'K CO HAINTE-NANCE MAT:' R,IALS 0 0 7 ron 6 4 7 3 * 7 IGOR FEJDA 0THE.R CONSTRUCTION CCSTS ------- DISEASED TREES(MILEAGE) 0 0 7 5-1 6 5 161927E*255 1ST NAIL BANK OF ST PAUL BONDS PAYABLE i A NO 00 BON 0 INT EREST 0 0 7 51 6 - 13*20 FISHE-1 PAOTC SUPPLY CO SUPPLIES, EQUIPMEi._'NT 0 0 7 5-00 7 ------- 88 '.00 F'L E X I BL %Eo P I P E'_'14 C 0­__ SUPPLIE , EQUIPMENT 0 8 81 FCREMAN + CLARK UN,I FORM S + CLOTHING- 307 r--06 9 4920 G M C TRUCK CENTER SUPPLIES, VEHICLE 00 7 570 - 2 2 T * 0- 4 ______ ARTS__'+­_'_CRAFTS'_'___ SUPPLIES S PR G A M' - -- - - 007 178050- GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS ":7 QU I PMi:7 NT, 0 F FI C E 007 C�07 2 231 L4 GCOCYEAR SERVICE S T 0 E R ih- + MAI NT V EHI C LCES )3 0 7 rov-7 3 G C P F, E'R SH 00 T ER S ­ s L p'p L - y '- --' _- -- SUP R ANGE.__ ___ 0 0 7 50 7 21909 JANEJ GRE.W TRAVEL + TRAINING -- - _ - -- - 0 0 7 575 343*86 GRO','Z.,S INDUSTRIAL F E"Em 3 S ERVIC E AN04wUNI FORMS + CLOTHING 0 0 7 rio-7 6 430,11+6 GRUEERS HARGWARE HANK MAINTENANCE MATERIALS .0. 0 7 5? -7 -2- i 0 f 1 T l LUTIN - --- --- H A N-C E" ' 'D I " 'h�,C SUPPLIE_ SI---'- EQUIPM ENT 3 OT 51 86900 HAWK PAINT + JANITOR CO SUPPLIES, JANITORIAL D07579 20*00 ROLANO HELEY UNIFORMS + CLOTHING r. .307,80 2 000 - - - - -- -- - - - -.. m. IC HA CL 44 ­ ' ER ELR T UNIFORMS + CLOTHING - 0 0 7 8 1 Eo56 JUDITH HORS TRAVEL + TRAINING - - -- 007582 29172*20 INTERSTATE DETROIT REP. + MAINTov VEHICLES ANO-SUPPLIES, -9 VEHICLE CfTY OF MAPLEWOOI) A C C 0 U N T IS P A Y A B L E DA T %E li-m 20-w8G PA GE 7 H &E C K ti A M 0 :U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S t 3 07 583 224o CO ................. ... JUDSON FA14ILY CENTER ..... FEE-S-9 SERVICE PSYCO LOG I.CAL TESTS 00 26*51 KEINDELS SUPER .. MARKET SUP PLIE S, PKp`O GR A M 3 07585 429 00 LAKrE SANITATICN FEES.9 SERVICE. REMOVAL—— 3 0 7 5 86 1 E5 LAW ENFORCEMENT EGUIP CO UNIFORMS + CLOTH INS 0 0 7 ✓9*57 LEES AUTO .SUPPLY SUPPLIES, VEHICLE Ah0,,wSUP PLI-ESq EQUIPMENT 0 79.01,83 L U 4 B?m R — ----- -- NT','.'.-N ANCE 0- 007589 27 C06 MFH INOU1.5"ITRIES INC R.EmP* + MAINTot EQUIPMENT 007590 32e76 MAPLEWOOJ REVIEW PUBLISH ING ' 09 i 3 0 7 E- -- ----- 1 2 0 ------- "'M A P L E W J 0 3 R S UB S CR I P T 1 0 N S + M En M 8 iiR S H I F 0 0 7 9 2 19086*40 METRO INSPECTION SERVICE F EES, S E R V I C `E ------- ELECTRICAL— INSPECTIONS 07593 1581,008 MN PININt3%l + MFG CC SIGNS + SIGNALS A# 10 759 4­ " - 7 8 ------ 0 STAT'00 '* -OF a DOCUMENT DIVISION 0 07 59 10 8.82 STATE OF MN OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS DEPT'.­ OF- TRANSPORTATION 307596 12*25 MINUTEMA4 PRINTING PUBLISHING 3 0' 7 E 9? - ------ - - - - -1 98 00 _ LA_ _ N0 S CA_ PTNG---'-'--- OS J6 ER`VICE_____ SEEDING & MULCHING 907598 53*00 MUNICILITE CO SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT 0 0 7 59 9 3, 222.11 CITY OF 14ORTH SOT PAUL UTILITIES 13 -0 -7 6 0 0 ...... '-6.0.55 OR T H' MAINTENANCE" MATE-RIALS. 007601 1 84*83 NCRTHERN STATES POWER CO UTILITIES 007602 1 9 E 4 5 _ NCRTHE RN STATES POWER CO U TI LITI ES 6 a 0T03 6 7 3 7 5 '______'NCRTH�-RN _ST ATES__ POW UTILITI 0 0 7 EO 4 42,99:55950 NN NATIONAL BANK OF MPLS BONDS PAYABLE ....... .... .. . A ND— BON C INTERtST CITY OF - MAPL.EWOOD A C C 0 U A T S P A Y A B L DATE 11,m20-m80 PA GE CHECK* A M 0 U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S ---- -- A ND -0TH ER CHARGES 007 -05 18 N h t ATIONAL BANK CF t?LS BONDS PAYABLE AND—BOND INT.EREST 007622 4. 54 SATELLITE. SERVICE CO A NO -0TH ER CHA P GE S - 0 0 0 4 NGRTHWESTERN BE'LL T E'L_*'C0­'___'_ - -- __ TtLEPHONL" 907E0 7 7 50 . �5 NGRTHWESTERN BELL TEL CO T E Lt*"P HO NE 0 07E0 442. 77 NCR"THWESTERN FELL TEL CO TELEPHONE 3 z 0709 1.0 NCRTHWSTERN _T ELEPHO NE 007610 5900- LAVERWl" NUTESON TRAVEL + TRAINING 0 0 7 Eil 2l'4,v0E99E0 GEORGE W OL,'z.EN CONS CO AWAROED CONST CONTRACTS I 0 0 7 61 - -- - 1 0 . 00 VA R J 0 R I E 0 _C S T R_ 0 M___ T R AV E L­ + T R A I NI -- 107613 7.32 0XYc%o%;m7lNv SEORV ICE CO I NC SUPPL�IiEslo VEHICLE ,J 07 E14 PAL EN REFRIGERATION ING RtPe + MAINTo, BLDG+GROS 0 0 7 Ei 5 2 0 75:.00 F ET ER SON, BE LL --+----C-CN VERSE - - - -- FE&.St SERVICE-------------- PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 0 0 7 E16 5,900 JOSE PR ET T N Ew'R TRAVEL + TRAINING 007617 42900 RAPS'EDY CO CHIEFS CF POLI BOOKS 27050 R E E L T I R E S A L E S'_ I NC, M A I NT q-'--j---V--EH I C L E S 007EI9 18 3*10 k0A0 RESCUE INC SUPPLIES, VEHICLE A N D m' R EP M A I N'T _'_V E H I C 007E20 152*30 w RUGGED RENTAL RUGS FEES, SERVICE ---- -- CLEAN __CARPETa__ 907621 2 58.15 S T OFFICE PRODUCTS SUPPLI.IESt OFFICE.- AND- SUPPLIES t JANITORIAL 007622 4. 54 SATELLITE. SERVICE CO FEES, S ERVICE CHEMICAL TOILETS 007E23­ 3 1: 0 SCHELEN ELE C T R I-C REP -MA"PNT BL0'G+GRoW_:.1 v4 i� f DATE 1l• 20 -80 PAGE 9 '; CI TY CF M�Pu.EM000 A C C O U �� T S P A Y A 8 L �: C H E CK* A A 0 V N T C L A I M A N T I� P U R P O S E I ;3 it 307824 149378.52 S.CHGE + MADSON INC i OUTSIDE ENGIN=ER ING FEES 4 AND FEES, CONSULTING 0 07 E25 4,571974 SHORT, ELLI OT, OUTSIDE ENGINEER ING FEES AND HENDRICKSON 30762 - 125 CITY OF ST PAUL ..- - - - - -_ - - R=P.: + MAIhiT., EflUIPMENT f A ND -REP . + Mai INT . , R ADI G AND —FEE S, Sti'RVIC E 3 07 E27 32.50 ST FAUL RAMSEY HOSPITAL F .ES, SERVICE PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS 307628 „ _ 140.0D S T FAUL + SUBURBAN 6US C _ F ES, S ERVICE SENOIR CITIZENS 007629 30.97 SLPERAMERICA SUPPLIES, VEHICLE J07630 150060 TABULAT IN C SERV BUR EAU FEES, S ERVICE DATA PROCESSING 0 0 7 E31- - _. - - - - - -- _ 15.83 - TAR GET ST OR, ES -INC - - -. --- -'- - -- - -- - -- - - - SUPPLIES, PROGRAM—— - - -- 307E32 23.36 H R TOLL CO I MAINTENANCE. MATERIALS 007633 52.73 T RANSP.AR= NT INDUSTRIAL SUPPLI S, OFF ICE E€ 0 07634 - - -- - - - - - - -- bi -- __ - - -- _T RUCK 0 0 7635 127. E4 T CITY H AF:CWARE CO MAINTENANCE MATERIALS ANO — SHA LL TOOLS . - - -. -- r 3 E - -- --- - - - -- 2:7.25 - -- _ _ — ----------- TW CIT TE O THER CON STRUCTI ON CCSTS s 007E37 184.35 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS + CLOTHING f 007E38 _ - - - - - ___ ._23 .9.0 -- UNI O . ST'oR S '--- -..--- __------- .---- - - -. -_ I . - .. RANGE- ___.. -___. 0 0 7 E39 754.75 VALS BODY SH A/R IN ND = ; -- . MAIN . _:; VEHIC 0 07 E40 72.79 VIKING INDUSTRIAL C ENTER 3 CHEMICA LS _- ._ .._...._ _ . .. AND —UNI FORMS + CLOT 1 07641 1 25 VIKING PIPE SERVICES CO FEES S ERVICE SEWER TELEVISING CI OF -.MAPLE WOOD A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A 8 L E DATE it -20 -80 P A G E 10 C H E A M 0 'U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S E TEMP. 007E42 1 VIRTUE PRINTING CC SUPPLIES, OFFIC%. TEMP* 01 _6473 - 0 9 L U -'H'D W R t NARNERS TRUEVA' _E SUPPLIES, OFFIC' c 007662 70000 KAREN BURTON AND - MAINTENANCE MATERIAL TEMP. PLIES, PROGRAM ...-ANO-m-SUP . 40 AND 'SUPPLIESt VEHICLE 007E44 E*52 DUANE J WILLIAPS TFAVao`L + TRAINING 007645 18060 PETER FASTNER SALARIES + WAGESl Tr-.VP. 9­_#30___'___­__ -CAN I FLE.MING ...... . S-ALARI,1,7.S-'-+-'WAGc.S-I----'T;z.7MPs 007E47 13*95 MARK MALLORY SA + WAGES, TEMP* 0 0 7 E48 36*00 BEVERLY MASTERMAN SALARIES + WAGE-Sq T%c..MP* - -- 007 -''SAL'ARIES --+'-WAGES­4'- TEMPS 4307E50 40*20 CAVID WALDEN SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 307651 6 5. 00 PARY ALBRE..&f..'o%hT SALARIES + WAGES -9 ?IMP* TEMP. _AGN_ES__ALL_ E N 007E53 65000 VICTORIA ANCERSON SALARIES + WAGES9 TEMPO 0 0 7 E5 4 63900 DOROTHY ARBORE S AL ARIE, S + W AGES, T E. MP 9 '---D'0'7 65 5' 70- 9 SALARIES +- -WAGES' -'-'-Tr-.V4P 007636 70000 EVELYN I AX0AHL SALARIES + WAGES9 TEMPS 007657 72o00 0, 1 A ht'"m 8 SON SALARIES WAGES T EMpe TE5& BLTI ��_M_V:, 93 -S AL A R I = _S­_"4 #AM _­_W A G" S__ ­____ 9 T E M P 68* 007E59 70000 1 D A P A Emo BI E" 8 1 G H A U S ER SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 007660 69.00 PATRICIA BLANCK SALARIES + WAGE-St TEMP* _01 6 6f- DORIS -'L-- 007662 70000 KAREN BURTON SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. CITY OF-MAPLEWOOD A C C 0 U q T S P A Y A 8 L E DATE 11.20- 80 PAGE 11 C H E CK* 007663 T0.7 (64 007E65 007E66 007667 007668 007669 fl 01670 01-6-7-0 0 0 7 E71 007672 007674 007675 6 6 007677 007E78 0 6 -- 7 ,- 67 007 007E81 ..... .. j - 6* 7 - 682 - - - - 0 007684 - 441 007686 A M 0 'U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S 7" LUCILLE CAHANES S AL ARIE S + WAGES 9 T EMP 64*00 66900 0 EL CRES C 3L EMA N SALARIES + WAG' v T#zAMMPs 66900 MARILYN CU"4NINGHAM SALARIES, + WAGES9 TEMPO 66,900 MILCRED JiE-HEN SALARIES + WAGES9 TEMP* - - -- 74.00 - - -- KATHL 0 TTLL SALARIES + WAGES, 7 0.00 ESTHER DOLLERSCHELL SALARIES + WAG#r..Sip TEMPO 66.00 AUOREY DJE.,LLMAN SALARIES + WAGE-Sq TEMPO 0 0 7 00 -_... L ... EA ST MA. N S A'L A R I ii- m-o' S - -- WAG ES9 'Tp Po' 66900 NANCY EM3ERTSCN SALARIES + WAGES TEMPO 62*00 PHYLLIS E-RICKSON SALARIES + WAGES TEMP, SA'LARIE S + WAGES, TEMP*' 7 2.00 LCRRAINE FISCHER SALARIt" S + WA GE S T E P. P 6 5400 PETER FISCHER SALARIES + WAGESv TEMPO 7 2.25 - h N S 8 U R G H SALARIES WAGES-,P--- TEMP. E68900 RITA FREJERICKSON S A L A R I UE S + WAGES q T .MP. 74*00 JANET GA30R SALARIES + WAG,..St Tlr--.MP* '-j CAN, GA EY SALARIES WAGES ,9 TEMP* ' 70*00 ORPHA GETTY S AL A -RIE S + WAGES T E M P . 66900 VIRGINIA GLOVER SALARIES + WAGES T "MP* -- - -- - -- W I '' G 0 1 ZEN -. SALARIES + WAGES TEMPO 74*00 ELIZABETH HAAS SALARIES + WAGES, TEMPO 70.13 JEANNEO A SALARI,,. S + WAG -S,9 t TEMP* 70*00 WYMAN HA5EMAN .SA Alm LAIZI O-S + - TEMPO 730 co MARLYS HARTMAN SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. CITY CF MA PLEW00C A C C O U N T S P A Y A 6 L OA TEND li- 20.80 Pa GE 12 CHECK* A M 0 z "U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S 007687 70000 6EA H NDRICKS SALARIES + WAG`S, TEMP. _. 007E 88 7 4.00 ARLEN% HoLST SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP 0 0 7689 . ........ ...... 68.00 NILGRED HOUCK SALARIES + WAGES, TEMPO 007690 690 12.00 BAR SARA HOWARD S ALARHow S + WAGEmS , TEMPO _. 0 07f91 - -- - -- - E7.00 .__- -- - - - - -- . NA RY---- JG -H� '4SJ ti.. - SALARIES + WAGES i EMP. 0 0 7E92 70900 SANLRA JONES SALARIES + WAGES, T.MP. 007 693 74. 00 JANET KAMPF SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP • _ - -- 3 0 7.E94 _ - - - _ - - -- Eb 0 0 - HMA K� L3 E S ALARIt S + WA GES i TEMP. 00 7 E95 66000 BAREARA LEI TER SALARIE S + WAGES, T Em MP 007696 62.00 LYNETTE LEONARD SALAtRIE S + WAGES, TAMP. 007697 7 .3 8 _ MARY �.I 8H A.. DT SALARIt S + WAGES - , T EMP. 007698 6 y . C0 NARY LOU LI EDER SALARI} S + WAGE T MP. 007699 68.00 JOYCE LIPINSKI SALARIES + WAGES , TEMP. 007 700 - � �. 00 SALARIES + ' WAGES 9 -- • 007701 72. 00 S hIRLEY LUT T LL - - ^ -_ SALA - + W TE MPO 00 65900 DtLCR S MAL LET SALARIES + WAGES, T En. MP. --___ - — - -- - - -- SALARIES: +_ ...WAGES ;_ t 077 04 66900 JEANNE MCNULTY S + W AGES, T 0077 66900 ALICE MIL SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 0)706 E5. 0 BERhADINE 4" TENSEN -_- - -_ -- SALARIES + WAGES , -_ - TEMP. 7707 121.13 JEAN MYE:ZS SALARIES - +WAGES , T EMP. 0 07708 7 0.00 JANET NISKA SALARIES + WAGES, TE MPO a07 709 -- - - -- - - - -- - C0 - - - -- --SCR AINt - SALARIES + �4AGES - - EMP, 00771 7 2 .00 MAXINE OLSON SAL ARIES + WAG ES, TEMP DATE li• 20-w80 PA GE 13 CIT Y OF MA PLE WOO 0 A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E CHECK* A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S E.. 007711 70.00 ARMQLLA PODGGRSKI SALARIES + WAGES, T�:MP. - - -0 0 7 llZ -- - - - - - -- - -- -- 1.. -.C� -- - L INCA PR I GG t _ S ALARIE S + W A GES , T EMP. 007713 7 0. OD ALBERT RA SC HKE SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 007714 62. CO S IBSI SANOCUIST SALARIES + WAGES , TEMP. ­ -9 0 7715_ 7 _ 38 - - J EAN�V SC NA 0T - SALARIES + WAGES , T Ew MP • 007716 62. 00 JOYCE SCH MI DT SALARI: S + W AGES , TEMP. 007717 7 3.00 L CRRA INE SC HNE I DER SALARIES + W A G , T EMP. _ 0 07716 - - - -- - - _-- - - - - - t o oo -- G EORG I A -s_ WANOT -__ _. _ - _ SALARIE s + wAG ; t EMP. 007719 70. CO FLCRENCE STELLA SALARIES + WAG`S, TEMP. 307720 120900 E CI?N STOTT LEMEYER SALARIES + WAGES , T E.MP. - -- 0bT721- -- - - - -- -- 78963 .._.... KAT HY SUPAN - - _ - -_ - - - SALARIES + WAGES - ;. TEMP. 007722 71.19 ICA SZCZEPANSKI S + WAGES, TEMP 007723 68.00 E VE LYN TARA RA SALARIES + WAGES , TEMP. P E - - -- - - -- -- -- - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - -- - S + WAGES ; - TEMP 007725 78963 P ATRICI A M THOMPSCN SALARIES + WAGES , TEMP. 007 726 66.00 MARJORY TOJLEY SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. r A 72.29- - -- - CARL INE A NER_ _------ - - - - -- - -- - -- - --- -- - SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 3 007728 66.00 CHAR W ASI LUK SALARIES + WAGES f TEMP. 007729 69.20 MICHAEL WAS ILUK SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. - 00 173p__.. ---- - - - - -- - - Eb. U0 - - .UC�ITH_ WI OHC LM __- _ __-- - - - - -- - - -- -- - -- SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 007731 7 P.63 MARGAR T X10 LSZON SA + WAGES, I T EMP. -- 007732 407900 ACTORS THEATRE OF STPAUL FEES, SERVICE GALS GETAWAY 5 U P P L i t S , 0 F F I C c - -- -- - - - - Es 007 7.0 SANCR DOBER R E F U N D l? - - - - -- __ - __ -- _ YOUTH GYMNASTICS —._- -- - E w80 14 M PA G L DATE tiw 14 CITY CF- M A A C C 0 U 4 T S P A Y A 8 L CHECK* A M 0-U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S 007735 9*44 DRAKES HYDRAULIC SERV REP. + MAINTst+EQUIPMEiNT 070 00 13ARETH - BROS SA ' LE L S TAX PAYABL A NO,= R E F U N 0 ARIEL PHOTO 0 7 73-7c- C J I H A F F U am VOLLEYBALL 007738 9*69 JOHN KENAEDY HUGHES SUPPLIC".S9 PROGRAM. 007739 12*50 SHIRLEY KIRCHOFF R E F U N 0 GALS GETAWAY L'ZNCCWSK_I FEES S E U I C t CURB & GUTTER 007741 12s50 ELSIE LU31NSKI �R E F U N 0 ­GETAWAY GALS 307742 55000 WENCY STiANSKY R E F U N D VOLLEYBALL ___0_ 01 741 — VOLLEYBALL 007 74 41 6 4 3 -2 0 VENETIAN INN F EE S, SERVICE GALS GETAWAY 007745 2*50 EIC•LAB CORP SUPPL IES, PROGRAM TOTAL OF 268 CHECKS TOTAL INDICATES ITEM PAID FOR BY RECREATION FEES CITY OF MAPLE WOOD CHECK Rt I S TER ;-- PAYROLL DATED R 11 -07 -80 Dl�TE 11 -07 - 80 CHECK ND. CLAIMANT GROSS NET 25 ):37 PARRY P EVANS 1, 536.92 ' -)73.26 25 -83 VIVIAN R LEWIS 62.5,. 417.89 9r39 L A I E l_ BF TEEN 522000 349.28 990 Lt4 3I t - L F FAUST 1, 222089 869.34 2 - ARL I :14E JHA(3 E'l 751.38 325.53 25 992 ALA A,A K u ►ATHc - :YS 522.00 421.96 2 a9 -) 3 LUC I LLB E .AUR#,- -I.1 US 1. 142.00 606.73 25994 PHYLLIS C ( ;Rr - :N 749, 70 5 09 *26 25995 F+ T l Y z; S EL VCS:; 617, T 6 400.43 259')6 LOR A I �!E S V .I F T0R 552 . 9O 345, 78 25947 J I vc L S C H A 0 T 1,98.8 3 152.82 2 99 "Lt -i)' J PELOQUI N 601.35 63. �� 7 259 ,,- J I- 'Si C K L E I N 104.13 94,40 26600 T A' - lCF C R It._EY 97.75 97.04 2bC0 l I)AV i l) L A ? JOLI) 966.46 30 3.23 2 �, 002 ifil -f-4 H A 1 CH I SON 1348 .. 31 5178.21 2600 A rho v C AH A E S 959. .536 * 6 2 26 GQ4 i ALA K C LAUSC'I 848. 34.68 2` CJ5 KE!'d*JLTH V COLLINS 971).15 69,006 261 C06 t "1 I Sf L T CRC)WE -. 525.23 * '84 26007 UEN :'IS J DELMONT 1, 126.23 .361 1') #51 26008 R i Cr-i AR D L DREGER 967,. X35 551 .16 .266 � AY� E FE�.'E cw 8 69.51 297.91 2601 t ` t REtEi �i'�i' -� ,v L � 986.77 14.40 �' 5 t bc� l t T1 -iG' 4S L HAGF 4 1, 204, 31 186.45 �6t12 KEVIA R H ALW�G 348.31 405.65 1601.3 STt!', -jE + J HE IN 525.23 - :351 *89 26C 14 M' I CH AEL J NFRr'�-R T :494, 59 544.24 ?6015 r i* I Ct- 1R0 J LAS €� 887.54 4'91.69 260 16 JO J M� NUL TY 986.31 554 .4 3 26017 J.4Mr S E MFEHAN JR 837099 442.34 26018 DAA -L B METTLER 871.38 54 * 51 26(; 1'4 ? I CH iR M MO SCH TER 364.21 522.30 26020 RAY; -; VD J MG.4 =LL i 832. 15 543.38 26021 ' .3�� ZT D `IELSuiN 1 * 90 667.18 26 "TLL1AM F PtLTIER 949.85 523.22 2602 RI CI IRD v4 SCHALLER 1, 303 8l 502.86 26024 Oil W SKALMAN. 348.31 7.64 2'SO2 5 ( :)qEf - L S TtAFNE 911091 541.81 26,026 v E i- ►w ON T STILL 832* 15 473..35 26021 i)ARRt':LL T ST0l -.KT0N 832.,.15 541.94 26028 CUA`JE J W I L L I A M S 880.62 436.22 2602 ,1 4 JOStPH A ZAPPA 988.15 636.82 2603 f) I)EDf )RrAH A BAS TYR 424* 15 204.78 26 031 J AY mr L F L AU 556.15 367.40 26032 VET)' <GE W MULWFE 496* 15 313.82 26033 KAR ,- N A �iELS0A 505.45 .317.83 26034 10Y E Of- A T 468900 322 . i0 260 35 JOAAJ' E M S1 ENOSEN 556.15 368.60 260 30 M ICHELE A TUCI-3'JER _ 496. 1 ti 267. KI3 26037 R0'4 Lf) D BECKER 919. 213.25 260 11)EA`i 1 S SCUS ICK. 1 396.2 3 851.41 260 3 9 DAVID M UrRAF 887.54 398.85 26040 R.0GLR W LEE 960.98 544.5 26041 JO'I A MELANDER 865.82 24.51 ?6042 t;,'%Ri3L M -NFL SON 1,156o38 666» 21 26043 UALr E RAZSKALOFF 887.54 110.44 26044 CAROL L R ICH I E 392, 77 259071 26045 MI C14A1_L P RYAN 902.513 400o38 26046 ROnr RT E V0RW4_ RK 951.14 179.18 26047 JAMES C YOUNGREN- 902.58 524.15 26048 JAMES M EMBERTSON 740.77 500.52 2 6 0 49 ALFI-:ED C SCHADT _ 953.54 578.63 26050 LARR J CUCE 138.46 107.82 26051 WILLIAM L BI TTNER 19264.23 907.92 26452 26053 JAMES G F L I A S NARY A NEMETZ 790.62 464.77 439.94 311.72 260'54 DE N!41 S L PECK 790.62 451.25 26055 26056 JUD I TH A WFGWERTH 1' 1.60 154.71 26057 ROBERT F WILLIAMSON 730.77 462.24 WAL I ER M GC I SSLER 881.44 546.27 CITY OF MAPLFW,00D CHECK REGISTER - PAYROLL DATED 11- -01 -80 CHECK NOO CLAIMANT 26058 JAMES T GE SSELE 26059 KENNETH G HA IDER 26060 JAMt'- S N WYMA 1i 26061 WILLIAM C CA SS 26062 ROAALD L FRESPRG • 26063 RO!lALD J HELEY 26064 MICHAEL R KAW 26065 mElNiZY F KLAUS ING 26066 GERALD W MEYE : 26067 ARNOLD H PF AR`: 26068 JO.S = PH B PR E T T `�E 26069 FDWARD A RE INERT 26070 GFORGE J R ICHA.�D 26011 G I Lt? l =RT C L A R CC H E 26072 M PA UL I NE ACA ' ; 26073 RUDOLPH R BAR.ANKO 26074 L O I S J BRENN �R 26075 BARBARA A KRU1`? "EL `) 7 26076 ROBERT D ODEGAK D 26077 ROY' G WARD 26078 PYLES R BURKE 26079 DAVID A GERMA 26080 MELVIN J GUSIADA 26081 ROL AND B HEL EY 26082 MARK A MARUSKA 26083 REED E SANTA 26084 V I Ct4AEL L JUNK ER 26085 GARY P JOHNS&N 26086 BAR ARA J BRW -4 26087 JAS L T M GREW 26088 JUDITH A HORS :IEL L 26C89 C H R I S T I N E SOOTIER 26C90 JUDY M CHLEBECK 26091 T140MAS G EKS TRAND 26072 RA "C ALL L JOHN'S v 26093 NA :4CY J MI SKELL 26094 GEOFFREY W CL EOfl 26C )5 MAR40R I E OS T OM 26U96 ROBrERT J WENG`- R 26097 RICHARD J BARTHOLOMEW' 26098 DAVID B EDSON 26099 EDW 'kRD A NADF U 26100 IAVRVE S NUT4= SD3 2610.1 GERALD C OkEN 2.6102 WILLIAM S THERE 26103 JOH :q E MACDO.JALD 26104 1 I S M MULVANEY CHECK NUMBER 25987THRU 26104 PAYROLL DATED 11- 07--80 25985 JULIE K SCOTT(I0- 30 -80) 25986 HARRY J TEV LIN 26104 IGOR V FEJDA GROSS 6 74 * 31 958.62 617.54 97 *46 696.80 696.80 696.80 696. 80 696. HO 704.92 Q 37. 4 5 6`4680 696.80 5 04, 92 679.85 893.54 577 .0 00 231 *0th 1,153,85 277.65 696 * SO 703.33 997.63 103.33 619.40 709 *87 163.00 55,060 .194.00 519..20 180.00 519920 584.:31 689.05 636,o46 205997 I 133.*69 958.62 6'46 -a 62 7 37.014 6.51,o20 741.04 95450. 710.40 73704 768.80 743.20 87 230.16 714.78 440.00 HATE 11 -07 -80 NET 451,.87 366. 438.60 494.04 445.51 445.51 298.52 390.03 343.62 460.61 632.36 445.51 428, 72 -335.87 433 *71 563.44 194.93 136.23 . _24.44 217.,23 36 7 .-2 7 445.19 550.34 61 * 88 4 06 * 80 :389.64 140 �1 54,61 .152.2.8 347 . X32 142.58 347,82 2 70. "40 410981 404.93 1.56.97 639.77 61 / 0.60 4 1 54 a 7 414.16 41 -).45 496.8 1 368.71 472.33 501.07 441.69 458 *82 47,549.61 * ** 17 7 .*15 527.09 336. 53 ** *TOTALS * ** 88, 485590e38 �s Z*0' MEMORANDUM TO City Manager FROM Finance Director and Public Works Director RE Financing for Gall Avenue Feasibi Study DATE November 7, 1980 PR nPnSAI It is proposed that a transfer of $1,709 from the General Fund to the Special Assessment Fund be approved to finance the portion of the Gall Avenue feasibility study costs related to improvements not requested by the developer. BACKGROUND On October 4, 1979 the City Council authorized separate feasibility studies for improvements on Gall Avenue (Project 79 -10) and Lakewood Drive (Project 79 -11). These studies were contingent on the developer (Tilsen Homes, Inc.) paying for the cost of the studies. On November 21, 1979, the developer deposited $4,500 with the City to cover the cost of the feasibility studies. While the studies were in process the Engineering Staff requested Schoel l and Madson , Inc. to expand the scope of the study to include the non - petitioned area of Gall Avenue from Lakewood Drive westerly to the termi nous of the Gall Avenue petition. The cost for this additional work (along with interest expense on interim financing) was $1,709. On May 1, 1980 a public hearing was held on these projects and it was decided to reject all proposed improvements except for 380 feet of water mai on Gall Avenue. At this time, a transfer is needed from the General Fund to finance that portion of the feasibility study costs for improvements which were part of the third study. The 1980 Budget includes $30,000 for these types of transfers and only $4,827 of this has been used to date. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council approve a transfer of $1,709 from the General Fund to the Special Assessment Fund for the Gall Avenue Project 79 -10. November 7, 1980 STAFF REPORT To: City Manager Barry Evans From: Director of Public Safety R. W. Schaller Subject: Donation for Police Service from Trinity Baptist Church Please find attached a check in the amount of $225 from Trinity Baptist Church, 2220 Edgerton Street. They desire this to be a contribution for City services by the Police Department. I recommend the City Council accept this donation and commend Trinity Baptist. RWS.js cc Bulletin Board Finance Director 80- 013471 i TIR111IT11 ERPTIST CHUR H 2220 EDG ERTON STREET ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 774 -8609 ly 1 November 6, 1980 �- i Q TA ` i.» +,r. -• ' F:O;; Maplewood Police 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Sirs: It is with gratefulness that we enclose the following gift. Not being a tax paying institution, we want to express our thanks for your faithful service in a tangible way. The care and responsiveness of your department is sincerely appreciated. Sincerely, R t . r+ Rev. Hart ey Christenson Senior Pastor HC :mj NORTHWESTERN 22 -73 NO. � V! STATE BANK 960 ST Z 2 Z � 6 T111111TH BAPTI5T CHURCH PAUL, 2220 EOGERTON ST., HWY. 36 CHECK NO. 2223E ST. PAUL, MN 55117 * * ** TWO HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE & NO /100S DOLLARS DATE AMOUNT PAY TO THE ORDER OF I0/24/80 **** $225e00 rMAPLEWOOD POLICE 1 - 1380 FROST AVE. MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 ti • 0 • 111 111 ��� MEMORANDUM TO City Manager FROM Finance Director Public Works Director RE Financing for Beam and Lydia Openings DATE November T3, 1980 PROPOSAL r It is proposed that i nterfund transfers totaling $144,924 be approved to finance the opening of Beam and Lydia Avenues east of White Bear Avenue. RArvnP i 1Nn On May 18, 1978 the City Council approved a public improvement project for the opening of Beam and Lydia Avenues with a financing plan as outlined in the attached memorandum.. In December, 1978, $122,845 of state aid was transferred to provide initial financing for the project. It was planned that the remaining transfers needed to finance the project would be made upon completion of the project. Earlier this year the final payment was made to the contractor for the project. The project costs to date are as follows: Costs Est, Thru Costs Oct .1980 May, 1978 Contractor costs 142 130 Easements and related costs 41 -0- Interest expense on interfund loans 11,264 -0 Engineering & misc. costs 52 29 Total 248 , 462 $159 It is estimated that an additional $20,000 in costs will be incurred for the settlement of a remaining easement case. The main reasons that the project costs exceeded the May 1978 estimates were unanticipated easement costs and extra engineering related to the controversy over the lowering of the vertical curve on Beam Avenue. The transfers needed to finance this project are as follows: $ 21,302 from the W.A.C. Fund to finance water main relocation costs 2,264 from the Sewer Fund to finance sewer main relocation costs 119,304 from the State Aid Fund to finance the street improvements 2,054 from the Special Assessment Fund (Project 73 -9 Conway Ave.) to finance the Furness Court costs $144,924 Total The transfer for the Furness Court costs is from Project 73-9. Conway Avenue because the Furness Court project was closed in 1977. Therefore, a transfer is needed from some other project that was financed by the same bond issue (i.e. 1977 Bonds, lst Series). Project 73 -9 was chosen as this project has the largest cash balance of the two projects that are still open which were financed by the 1977 Bonds, 1st Series. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council authorize the transfers listed above. MEMORANDUM 7?-/Y TO Mayor and City Council FROM Michael G. Miller, City Manager SUBJECT: Street Improvements - Geam and Lydia Avenue Openings ( Agenda Item J-2) DATE May 15, 1978 The final plans and specifications have been completed for the opening of Beam and Lydia Avenues* The current estimated cost of the project, including engineering, legal and administrative cost, is $149,100.00. This figure includes both the Beam Avenue and Lydia Avenue connections; the improvements of Beam Avenue, east of Frederick Street; and the completion of the paving of Furness Court. The current estimate compares with an initial estimate done in September of 1976, prior to completion of plans of $79,000. The project is proposed to be financed as indicated below. The funding proposal reflects the eligibility for State Aid funds and the water and sewer adjustments associated with the project. State Aid Fund $ 122, 845.00 North St. Paul Water Availability Fund $ 21,320.00 Sewer Fund $ 9 35.00 General Obligation 2 City Project 75--8 (Furness Court) $ 2 The Council may wish to consider the addition of a landscaping plan to the street improvements on Beam Avenue, east of Frederick Street. The project will require regrading and thus the elimination of the existing trees in that area. . As rights of access to complete the project will be required from the property owners, replacement of the trees and shrubs removed, together with some terracing to save other plantings, may facilitate the rights of entry* - These improvements are eligible under present rules regulating State Aid funds in that trees and plantings may be replaced on a two -for -one basis. Replacement at that rate would result in an additional project cost of approximately $10,000-00. The approval of the project as indicated and authorization to advertise for bids is requested. �r q r November 6, 1980 MEMORANDUM To: City Manager Barry Evans From: Chief of Police R. W. Schaller Subject: Police Uniform Surlier, November 1980 Through December 1981 Please find attached a copy of the memorandum that I have received from h *Lieutenant Dennis Delmont concerning selecting a police uniform supplier for the remainder of this year and all of 1981. We originally had hoped .to remain with Foreman and Clark through the end of this year, however, f or various reasons they have ceased to be an acceptable Among the problems we have experienced are: 1. A new remote small shop location in the Town Square complex in St. Paul. 2. No meaningful supply or stock inventory of clothing items. 3. Unreasonable delays on delivery. Some jackets have taken five months and more for instance. 4. No reasonably priced or free parking for our personnel when they go to the store. S. A management personnel turnover with new inexperienced help. In view of the foregoing, I recommend we immediately switch over to Uniforms Unlimited based on their proposal as attached to Lieutenant Delmont's memo- randum. For your review and authorization. RWS : j s cc Uniform File Deputy Chief Hagen Dan Faust Lieutenant Delmont Lieutenant Cusick V t .r1_. "_ � •.V. +//iv /liiYawrtl /+MOO ° +f� - Yr - o .. f. s{. •..ter w•� a� r; } 0 November 5, 1980 MEMORANDUM - To: Chief R.W. Schaller From: Lt. D. Delmont Subject: Uniform Supplier, November 1980 to December 1981 Attached please find the price quotations for uniforms and supplies from Uniforms Unlimited. They represent an increase on most items, but this increase was anticipated. In a conversation between Mr. Olson and myself,*it was established that the 10% figure would be used for Reserve personnel as well. Due to the complete breakdown in the credibility of Foreman and Clark, and the lack of another supplier that can provide the number and quantity of items that we need, I reccommend that we accept this quote, effective immediately. The sec ond list indicates the differences between this quote and the 1980 bid by Foreman and Clark. DJD:jf �� ..._.�.,�.....- .- .+, +...... rn��wn....• nmrM�w. w..^- :,.. w.... n..-.. �- w.. e+ nw..:. �.., rlw...._• r.•.,,• �V..+ �c�r+-: a. w,. a... eeow. ....�•:�.�I+�wrr...enn•,., »r... .. _',:rJ•�I�WVS�traar+�srR+ww�sn ..... 7. e•. r. r... e, vae�+ acz* a�p�a lc,,;� «1R11��.r- .a:..r..r�s�:. ' IN Chief Richard Schaller Maplewood Police Department Maplewood , Minnesota Dear Chief Schaller, We are pleased to propose the following agreement to the City of Maplewood for purchase of the below listed uni- form and equipment items , This list covers uniforms for Police, Police Dispatch- ers, and Police Cadets, We agree to sell all the listed items to the City of Maplewood for 10% off the current list price at the time the purchase is made, All prices are subject to change, but you will be notified thirty days prior to the effective date of any price increase. During the time this agreement is in effect, Uniforms Unlimited will provide free parking for any Maplewood per. sonnel conducting business with us during store hours. We look forward to a good working relationship with you and your department. Re ctfully, ,f 7 ` ill Olson cc: Lt. Dennis Delmont Jon Radabaugh v' CI'I'"W' OIi W OD MLI I' PI-AIL.-A . . . `' 1380 FROST AVENUE M A PL EWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109 1 612- 770 -4530 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SA F FTY-- OFFICE OF CHIEF OF POLICE October 30, 1980 Uniforms Unlimited 189 E. 7th Street St, Paul, Minnesota 55101 Gentlemen: The descriptions below use brand names for reference only. Items of similar or better quality may be substituted. Fourteen month bid from November 1, 1980, to December 31, 19810 Clothing Trousers - Horace Small, 100% polyester, navy blue, front P ockets, no stripes 1 $26.95 Trousers - midweight dacron /rayon 28.95 Shirts - long sleeve, navy blue 100% texturized polyester 20.50 Shirts - short sleeve, white, 100% texturized polyester 18.50 Shirts - long sleeve, white, 100% texturized polyester 20.50 Shirts - short sleeve, navy blue, 100% texturized polyester 18.50 Jacket - winter, waist length, navy blue 64.9 Jacket - spring /fall, navy blue 54.95 Jacket - ' winter, 3/4 length, St. Paul type, navy blue, Butwin brand 85.95 Cap - five star, round, navy blue, Midway brand 14.50 Hat - winter, trooper, LHG 506, Midwest brand 13.95 Raincoat - rubber, yellow with corduroy collar, Rainfare brand 32.40 Rain cover - cap cover, MFG brand 1.25 Shoes - oxford, plain toe leather with crepe soles, 41.95 Weinbrenner brand 2 Shoes - oxford, Corfam . $ 4.6.- 9 5 4 , Overshoes - felt lined 19.95 Tie - 3 3/4" wide, navy blue clip -on, Brooma brand 2.95 Gloves - only foam lined 15.95 Jump Suit - navy blue, paramedics 22.50 Leather Goods Trouser belt - Velcro, plain black, Safari Land brand 19.95 Gun belt - Velcro fastener, plain black, Safari Land brand 40.95 Cuff case - Velcro, plain black, Safari Land brand 14.95 Cartridge case - Velcro, plain black, Safari Land brand 18.95 Flashlight holder - plain black, Safari Land brand 6.50 Mace holder - plain black, Safari Land brand 11.50 Hardware Whistle and chain - Acme brand 5.50 Handcuffs - Peerless brand 16.45 Hatband - gold 3.95 Tie bar - gold, police 3.95 Other - Dispatcher Only Shirts - light blue, long sleeve 14.50 Shirts - light blue, short sleeve 12.95 Patches - dispatcher 1.00 Trousers - navy blue 26.95 Belt - black 8.95 Police Cadet Only Shirts - short sleeve 8.95 Shirts - long . s 1 eeve 9.95 Pants - navy blue 12.25 Very truly yours, R. W. SCHALLER, CHIEF OF POLICE Dennis J. Delmont, Lieutenant DJD: j s Maplewood Police Department �-5 MEMORANDUM TO : City Manager FROM: Public Works Coordinator DATE: November 13, 1980 SUBJECT: BUDGET TRANSFER In the course of repairing the brakes on the Catapilar 930 front -end loader, a routine analysis of the various lubricants was conducted. These tests revealed that only normal wear was occurring in both the engine and the transmission, however, the grease in both differentials contained quantities of metal particles. The size of these metal particles dictate immediate repair in order to avoid further damage. Estimated cost of these repairs is $6,000.00. It is recommended that the sum of $6,000.00 be transferred from the V.E.M. Capitol Outlay Budget (901 -4640) to the V.E.M. Equipment Repair Maintenance Budget (901 -4430) in order to cover the cost of these repairs, d r. 4 s ��:.�6. '.f .r ,..•wc.+n :.+r.a.�,- .�.e..w -. ,..+r... -zvs� �...4t,• at .: AY MEMORANDUM Action TO: City Manager FROM: Public Works Coordinator •% DATE • October 30, 19 8 0 SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF SANDERS In 1979 it was anticipated that four (4) sanders would need . replacement following the 1979 -1980 winter season. Funds were therefore included in the 1980 Budget for that purpose. During the 1979 -1980 winter operations, we experienced. numerou s problems with sanders resulting in considerable down time. These problems usually occur when the sanders a r e g bein used. Put another way, failure occurs when we need them most i.e. during a snow storm. Three 1977 models caused most problems while three 1971 models and one 1973 model which were scheduled for trade -in. performed with fewer problems and less down time. At Its meeting of August 21, 1980, the Council awarded a con - tract to the lowest bidder for four spinner type sanders at a unit p rice of $2,565 less $350 for trade -in. • for trade -in were those which were ir- re The units selected result is that arable or needing extensive repair. The net P two 1971 models and a 1973 model have been retained. The re- Y liabilit of the retained units is highly suspect. • were being realized through the year which Certain economies w g 'cant savings in could conceivably have resulted in signifi g • the capitol expenditures portion ortion of the Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance Budget. • in available, an ex In anticipation of funds being tended purchase clause se was inserted in the specifications guaranteeing the unit price rice and trade -in thru November 15th, 1980. All major purchases hases have now been made from the V.E.M. Budget and' a balance of approximately $18,000 remains. It i s requested that staff be authorized to purchase three .additional sanders at a net cost of $2,2151per sander. i a MEMORANDUM TQ: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Final Plat - Goff' s Maplevi ew Addition DATE: November 10, 1980 Is Counci approved a PUD and p i mi nary plat on August 7, 1980. The developer is requesting approval of a final _plat for two lots on County Road C and an outlot. The lots conforrii to the preliminary plat. Al conditions necessary for this phase have been met. Recommendati on Approval of the final plat .Action by Couinci l: • 4aS- V • . Ah �� ' i .ea'. rt•.Jeh. - rr.a�. ... _�p-aaw�r Enclosures: Location Map Final Plat REAM 60 �.... P ,, Koh /mon 23 z . J 2� t E UAV. GE IT 44 -RN �E. A Loge � Lj 500 27 At r KOHLMAN h ROA or ) r SE AM AvE I � N J Y Y Y C LA F 31L E DG J H Q DE WONT LL AV !<U 0 ROpK AvE.2 o j W m SE X T T 1� 1.. j W t _ V Z Aj v �c 61 4 01 T 1 AV E. VA ! S G � ANDVIEW I FAVE OP 36 �•-� [ VIKINGDR. now SHERREN AVE _ COPE AVE _ � LARK AV LARK AVE ~ S j '.: q LARK AVE. N CQ TY Q f- R LAURIE RD. p O _ c¢ LAURIE RD A O ZS < z 4 u� = 2 AVE . �� 65 p J u N! TIOh AVE. � • W Y ax AVE. �- U RKE 6 E A IP U � ELDRIDG J AVE . L a , h a►w > E L MON T o AVE. N 64 t < VE u SKfLLMA 1{ m AVE. _ F- MAR RIS J N cc V o aYAPl ROS L [WOOD AVE. FROST AVE y FE NT,.ON AVE. SU ER A 4 p W t or FRISSIE AVE. _ < �- IL 3 0 = LAVEJ W wokefieid SO PH IA AVE _ > t ►- LOk C SOP AVE :2 _ Z J It _ z PRI E 4 ,`� G J O Z < 62 W A P IL NT w • a m . . F 007 nn AV r�.r_� t 28 I t' r W m W 3 � PETITIONER .. Pat Goff REQUEST Preliminary Plat and PUD 1. Location Map r r U. MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Time Extension - Goff's Mapl evi ew Addition DATE:- November 13, 1980 z Patrick W. Goff is requesting a 90 -day time extension for that portion of the preliminary plat not being considered for final approval. Council approved a PUD and preliminary plat on August 7, 1980, subject to conditions. Council w i l l be consi dering a final pl at for two lots on County Road C on November 20. There have been no changes in the area that would justify denying a time extension. The Applicant's letter of request is enclosed. Recommendation Approval of a 90 -day time extension on the basis that: 1. There have been no changes in the area that would justify denial of a time extension 2. The Applicant is showing progress in final platting the lots on County Road C 3. Counc.i 1 has approved time extensions for other plats �t on by Chi' -- fi r: . z Date �.......�. 60 EAM cr c z EDG U Z x 22 DEMONT AVE- b�ROOXJ LAVE 0 M Y Q 61 60 N T A V L AVE. G , F"A 14 AVE.] IVIKING F HERREN AVE COPE AVE. K49 He r LARK AVE. 25 LARK AVE. Lake C.,.N T Y � C � L LAURIE JI RD. cc RD, 0 ILELAQF7 < [OIL 25 x a JUN -CTIONJJ E A V E. 64 - IE V. G£ AV. U RKE cc su ELD U) RIDG AVE w ELMON T > 4w -coir -j W 64 4c VE SKILLMA AVE.x DD LA. Ft 13 < z �. � = z AVE. .� � � 65 ac fT. gt Itos lwc)O AVE. :.RNO WE. 28 0 FROST AVE so* 28. A% %%% S oo 27 F N AVE. in su ER % 1 62 0 x 49 FRISDIE AVE. IL 27 0 1111 111 11 111 111111111 �� [PtIPLEY] Wok ey"Ield Lake PH IA AVE Round -1=— - x Z w in Loh e 2 %c Lake Pholen 39 4c 0 z Z z PRI -62 A AVE IFIFIF-1 F-I 71 h ~ � � F- � �� *� ..� � J PETITIONER, Pat Goff REQUEST Preliminary Plat and PUD I F 0 to,( 0 KOHLMAN A U) ROAQS Z3 z • VE. i/f— ' EAM AVI Location Map - �'r 1. • . ,_ '. ' � .. .�. + . :, '�':•`� �' . ' '. '; ' • • '' � PROPOSED PLAT .!, • • • . • ; ''' . GOFF'S - MAPLEVIEIV* ADDITION ' : • ; • �', : `• •. 645 S. OWASSO BLVD, ST. PAUL MINNESOTA 55113 ' ' tom '• 1 3 • 1 i 7`, :� .` •��, `� I ` • , to Opp mow 1 ' ' , • , ' :" • 1 i Ott S ri/ / ( �1►,• ' 0 �• ' , 1 • / • / • 0101• / . /•,.•'•• a w do f ♦ •• d 6 0 fi w • ' � � ; •• •, ., • 1 . ., � r 1 � � `• `�� ` 0101 ..0.0 / I �♦ \ i p.. ( op • 1 : 0 4 F 1 r ,. � . ♦ . .., I i , 1 1 r / • i . \' , • 1' • � 'I 010101 � 1 ,, ,\ / � � .' • ' • - r -� \ 1 01 1 •' •, -' "jam' �) {I 1 r ` • x •N M . . , �- • If - 0 Pi M.. RIKIIIII(;e N is � I /` ,...• `, 1 ' r , ,•- , . • fMIK.1 • RR • TrN .� <sx�ry AOA/ � , � � l � ! 1 _ � • /• 1 . � _ � . II ' tl /ll# Ih 1111 % 1 • �•� ,j�,GENO IT DATA E D SCRiPTION • �' r� LOCATION � t 11�/M01 lM •••�t.�.. - 1/16114 Stu wa MIA ANo 0114! I;.K M K t as•, ►OT 11 AM 114 KII Ih a IV 11 a VA NO" � 411"Am � /w ' •�� - f, f !11 ..._.. «..�..�.. rw m w Lm - -- ■-- •---+� �.. 111are11� ftlrw tltil tots, Amu, Cowl, NImt14T4. ' "� f _. • ••� ••••••• -�•• i-• 61111100 wNKM UK "��• ••��' -�+• •��+• N• t ODD L109 ^p*41 a t ill It , r 1 t ! w.■.•�.■.r� +�. WIdNA U14 � ....•....�� �.. ...• I iM11wM ►iK ' WWI 110101111101 110101111101 ! I'"+�'�'""•� tJiilTIM f41t ►itK OU1.11T MITI /.Y MIIif/K. Ot1I61I1 � ►WVIAT {all) 0 3•16AP11 •11.1 /K. ►ot 1 t.00D , • MU MINI" 10.11. tot rI0t11 11111111/1 n /tlT t11fI1N talltt.a wl 1 - • .• � r ..+1 �� 4 . ""'S'�' �- .Itew / ./' •t � u s V w � w N ���� MAIM0101wIN� �t •... •. •... .,,,t ar••• • ' 11111311114 fMihMf 1044 111t�A» K01rrllrull uMC 1 ! �•���.� 1�� NAM 040 ••••w 1M 1l. RoD� L149 ,! , 1 0KIN4 ?R o nn e YTilnitl �unItIN11 , .� � w , , > .._..... ��' � •••• :•... • «.• ■ ( • •.0101•.. • , . • . ,_ '. ' � .. .�. + . :, '�':•`� �' . ' '. '; ' • • '' � PROPOSED PLAT .!, • • • . • ; ''' . GOFF'S - MAPLEVIEIV* ADDITION ' : • ; • �', : `• •. 645 S. OWASSO BLVD, ST. PAUL MINNESOTA 55113 ' ' tom '• 1 3 • 1 i 7`, :� .` •��, `� I ` • , to Opp mow 1 ' ' , • , ' :" • 1 i Ott S ri/ / ( �1►,• ' 0 �• ' , 1 • / • / • 0101• / . /•,.•'•• a w do f ♦ •• d 6 0 fi w • ' � � ; •• •, ., • 1 . ., � r 1 � � `• `�� ` 0101 ..0.0 / I �♦ \ i p.. ( op • 1 : 0 4 F 1 r ,. � . ♦ . .., I i , 1 1 r / • i . \' , • 1' • � 'I 010101 � 1 ,, ,\ / � � .' • ' • - r -� \ 1 01 1 •' •, -' "jam' �) {I 1 r ` • x •N M . . , �- • If - 0 Pi M.. RIKIIIII(;e N is � I /` ,...• `, 1 ' r , ,•- , . • fMIK.1 • RR • TrN .� <sx�ry AOA/ � , � � l � ! 1 _ � • /• 1 . � _ � . t :r tl /ll# Ih 1111 1 • �•� ,j�,GENO IT DATA E D SCRiPTION • �' r� LOCATION � t 11�/M01 lM •••�t.�.. - 1/16114 Stu wa MIA ANo 0114! I;.K M K t as•, ►OT 11 AM 114 KII Ih a IV 11 a VA NO" � 411"Am � /w ' •�� - f, f !11 ..._.. «..�..�.. rw m w Lm - -- ■-- •---+� �.. 111are11� ftlrw tltil tots, Amu, Cowl, NImt14T4. ' "� f _. • ••� ••••••• -�•• i-• 61111100 wNKM UK "��• ••��' -�+• •��+• N• t ODD L109 ^p*41 a t ill It , r 1 t ! w.■.•�.■.r� +�. WIdNA U14 � ....•....�� �.. ...• I iM11wM ►iK ' WWI 110101111101 110101111101 ! I'"+�'�'""•� tJiilTIM f41t ►itK OU1.11T MITI /.Y MIIif/K. Ot1I61I1 � ►WVIAT {all) 0 3•16AP11 •11.1 /K. ►ot 1 t.00D , • MU MINI" 10.11. tot rI0t11 11111111/1 n /tlT t11fI1N talltt.a wl 1 - • .• � r ..+1 �� 4 . ""'S'�' �- .Itew / ./' •t � u s V w � w N ���� MAIM0101wIN� �t •... •. •... .,,,t ar••• • ' 11111311114 fMihMf 1044 111t�A» K01rrllrull uMC 1 ! �•���.� 1�� NAM 040 ••••w 1M 1l. RoD� L149 ,! , 1 0KIN4 ?R o nn e YTilnitl �unItIN11 , .� � w , , > .._..... ��' � •••• :•... • «.• t :r t' s s r ^ •*,c , /�'�''•.�..� 64 ? of �: e.. 9 RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, that the following On -Sale Liquor Licenses having been previously duly issued by this Council, are hereby approved for renewal for one year, effective January 1, 1981, with approvals granted herein subject to satisfactory results of required Police, Fire and Health inspections: Bali-rHi Res tuarant , Inc. Brothers Deli 7-1 230t White Bear Avenue 3035 White Bear-Avenue Chicone's Bar & Cafe, Inc. Deans, Inc. 2289 Minnehaha Avenue 1986 Rice Street Fox & Hounds Gulden's Inc. 1734 Adolphus 2299 Maplewood Drive Holiday Inn of Maplewood J T Bar &. Lounge, .Inc. (Hideaway) 1780 County Road D 70 E. County Road B Garrity's Chalet Lounge 1696 White Bear Avenue 1820 Rice Street Maplewood Bowl, Inc. The Red Rooster 1955 English Street 2029 Woodlyn Avenue Nor thernaire Motel, Inc, 2441 Highway #61 Maple Wheel Lounge 2220 White Bear Avenue Payne Avenue Lodge #963 (Club License) Loyal Order of Moose 1946 English Street i, f C7 RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, that the following Off Sale Liquor Licenses having been previously duly issued by this Council, are hereby approved for renewal for one year, effective January 1, 1981, with approvals granted herein subject to satisfactory results of required Police, Fire and Health inspections: f� Delta. Liquors, Inc. Laber's Liquors; Inc. 3000 White Bear Avenue 1730 Rice Street J & R Liquors 2730 Stillwater Road Maplewood Wine Cellar, Inc. 1690 White Bear Avenue Little Red Wagon, Inc. 2290 Maplewood Drive C & G Liquors 1347 Frost Avenue Sarracks Internation Wines & Spirits 2305 Stillwater Road Party Time Liquors 1740 VanDyke Avenue �f, 71Z �..!c. -. - AZw t - . 7,7 1- y` 1.' +ennbx• ._ 1.`+,r, S • . - _ . - 7 � dr i x, ` ,� t ;. . CI'T'Y OF MAPLh'WOOD Application for Gambling License A lication is hereby made under Maplewood Municipal Code Chaper 822 which PP reads in part: SECTION 1. Chapter 822 of the Maplewood Code is hereby adopted governing licensing and regulating of gambling as approved by the State. Legislature and is to read as follows: "822.010. PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW ADOPTED. The.provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 349, and Laws of Minnesota, 1978, Chapter 50i, relating to the definition of terms, licensing and restrictions of gambling are adopted ` t and made a part of this Ordinance as if set out in full." "822.020. LICENSING REQUIREPIENTS. No person shall directly or indirec *iy operate a gambling device or .conduct a raffle without a license to do so as provided in this Ordinance." - "822.030. PERSONS FLIGIBLE FOR A LICENSE. A license shall be issued only to fraternal, religious, and veterans' organizations, or any corporation, trust, or association organized for exclusively scientific, literary, charitable, educational or artistic purposes, or any club which is organized and operated exclusively for pleasure or recreation as distinct from profit making purposes. F'.. Such organization must have been in existence for at least three (3) years in L . the City of Maplewood, and shall have at least thirty (30) active members." for a gambling license.. a' 1. Name of Organization Northeast Metro Alano Society, Inc. . 2. Address of Organization 1954 Hazelwood, Maplewood, Minnesota, 55109 :. 3. Date of Application: October 10 1980 410 Date of first meeting that has regularly continued to date in Maplewood January, 1975 5. List Officers of Organization: TITLE.- NAME • . ADDRESS PHONE # President Roger Renslow 610 Grange Ave. 735 -4602 St. Paul, MN, 55119 Vice President Mike Ads •1642 Barclay 776 -2481 �. F _ Y 1 St. Paul, MN, 55106 Treasu�er 11. Charles Peterson 10331 Dellwood Rd. 426 4832 3 .. Stillwater, MN, 55082 . _ _ , . . _ -� °a . _ �.•` , . . ' . , . • =. 833 Secretary Fl orence Grape - 2211 Birmi 777 St. Paul, MN 55106 r. wt a. - :..:►c.:rad �i:a.a,�Ll.t..i •.r_,..w,.. .�.s• - �_.s:.r�:... ... -,.f. _..-. .. ._ .. � _. i[..vc.`..•-ILL..tjY:5Y1 y . ,..•.., :. ,. r,,: ,- u�J•T.1,.'' J:rr - ".s+l s+�` �T'� _ _ Yce [ �y'� g " w r.%..f:., b ": - at':t STr' - w• a,,s •.a'N''r� >. 'Y�t t� �', :T; ..,tea, .,. •w � l4;.c.'. - .i •t,�c' .+. ..•y -,. 'c'f -•.� • .d '.E,- tGv_.�5. • t �.. >. Ri. 3 b: t.. �:<- Cf",.� i 'f y T y�"J .�.. ' •:°Y t'' ��t, .' ^ .` "a, ' -` ,.� .5.. r'+'i. � r [�., ^vf,:pt.,: - =.R r < wr' r }\.yi1 :):r••,P ±s`i r.•e"'f > : Z. - r -� X••.•t. > '!�^..ft i •�r'rd�rr. '43��';k•� ,.7 ?�. ��fSr ,�,�; r'�, . A i 1 .'„ � �: • � , i i • ,'�C •,r ' n :^4' +i. A '� • +� , � a r• ;, a _ �•.:l •,r.' •.� +t ' : `�`' f, .� �}�., .e,e$, Ff't:•ab._.[i v?� '1�� 4 t �t;i� - - .... .ai `4 •. 1 N. ( � f3 [ ':� bid r �} .'2�� .. - - . ;, ? tt.. -�"'}::.. a� �.. i ."`4TrLp,"1'd.' - ' . ;' .st, t • }t; G am" ,. .:� •� `y- "IM , �.. 3 k •Y- �?.>.i�'.wS-s: T f (� �V� .f - N�4��J ,r,l �� ^� � } n > k :!;'Tr 1 :.T l t �.� Z`YP f perm ion... ...b kh� • • etas orar Sing - �•,= '., D a te . �:!. Y - ; .Y -. .. r � :•+thy: f _ *' -. J- . •_, +• . '' i hj �'nVai. r. , X Paddle . - '••� .. �- '-�% 54,x.. 1 V•(,.% f P..'•� i t i , i boar �: � 1.1 � -'.V� Y f '..,y - Y •i . f 4 a' w to be .use �� �. • � � s - Prof it i • - � ' ! `f' :,. .f.� .:) i 1 � ,'; ,! �n.3 ��: #�` ,., ''�,�a•�.'- [ . 3 �'t a •. Y.!'a y,X. e- ;,.•+ -. \i �` -r"'�. ; . L r - � .:'� } 0. � M ...Y; � . •.t7 r ^lk. x-•.' - ��iecx• 1''�t, L. >`I r+.t r , f . � / ♦ ' .. > S YK, .},, .. s L r/ R,... �r 2'1". .. ♦o.'.. .5. ,i•.a .. f., �, s' St .. �t.Fr" ..4 'C rs q: { r Y ". 1 , a+4. u - e- ' .!)r .n ,Iw Sa tr 3. �• �3�'a�' g4'7 'LtY' -�.: �% - ..y.r-'F: f., } "! s - 'r.. , t rho.}. yti.1 � 1'%l r o'I.,�'; 4,,�.'.,t �, ; �: e�• r if � t' �"1' '� . it , • _' � '•t.• .. "'�Yl:- ..Ic;j.f'.. �.. `� a _ .)., r �•::`J' ' � � �} t[: (�•:' � -,L. .i ,.:R..: -< a'-'� .. �!r - :'•S'> •t <'. t' ' - - . 4•, 7 Y .i +. :-�`'b .'vY �` {, f�b �'•.'�' ��1 ) •�. is ;M�i;�. �,�'3�!'i �K -rs. 8 �7- :.yXS•� z �. .;Y 1 �'yYlt -r ... - .. J T�t� t �,.,}�+y < K-2' .,,w. s i � J ,3 � >. r . 1 ���lS•s ,'x t 'rk 2 :'! -i} .+.•a f `� rt'' t!#�I t'r: J - f ,' ° ' .?. x 3. ..•; c`.' �i Fl G4c -: ,3••. - .'•�.. d." F. t -t <rr- -�;'`w •''. '` er "-'"' ry 'w >3. {r�'r.µt �i S� l . ?Y.r' �? ;Y., r�.w �!`•F , y ... `P s �... -� r �:,K s r ffi, ,, �- : > �.s";ay.. ��,..y Z �i..' ° _ . 1 f t% r1..T - > .C�,, f<4+��"'- C,��3, i +� a•i3 �n w of r.f: _ y.' �b .a't:. .� 1. � ..r;. q:k 3',y etD` •ri•�= 1 a., tr;{ �• ^ •! , . h'L � Yry, r ��L ,Lt. � `g9at..'�•�'�',r 1T fir• 'r - r . .! �'>' " -,.. Y :: s..s tt J.`tq tr� �',+'F f _ ..�� •M - fi r M e. ... ,,� _ t r . - r rr, �p>1 ♦L " m i � t, t Y •_ a s a� f •? : 1 4 { t ` d i s , f•.` j 4 ! ' !Sias t • i* `� -> s... v . - - f ,t t Y•cY T - a r e L - C , .> 5 f f r:, •pia � :i �tfti% f ~ C ��- , ' � Z Y; �[ , rp, ), .kt Y• . .7' b�. 5•, = � .. �.. - y� !f .� /. �•V.�1.y �. f. s.�V y �c � Z.r fi y 1 s.•G!L P - owned by �ehe � ert o _ • - .real pro epaI p.. - -� y x , r n9 r y _ T y ! } 'N V ' . ; < �. r q \• � t^, >w fr t 4 % � +ac. �� 'l..- � f� •"! Y { T - ti. t r '3 �w�.�i s.. qc 4, K�. ti ? - � r )f.�,ti:^•. �t ; L r• , t t r!' r J -. y '� .� ' A r "� . .E J ., l y�35�PA•� �"�� •�`M1. � �`. J'P}. _ J+>_ N r N- ,Z � J... 4 y K 1 11 water _� ,,.,,: � .Yi :,'�" �.tm'#E �1'[*•w�tQ•i'�dt . � _ � +LN•. .: .r l > -V.N i' . ... F I41 �Y� a•�.5• i ,�: _ �'p. '( S..• � Y ' x � th /' 4 d T rY ' - F t�' C�ed� •; _ t Y r 'IL • f n 4 condu r ^. /yes � V ���/ . AAA y �-\ � * ? .A ''� i �r a%• r ert ���1�• .w :r, l �J 1 `T � s�'` � w<S f . F wit f S•t-. t: c ����/ +i T, }, r t s - z �'u . s¢ � t #- r ,�; +t7•,e s ''y` _ t ! 3r ... � ,C y i `� , t l '� .>3 � 3 qa'�• 5.•+'•1. „l.J..,+T r ...a � "t � - 's � ♦ S# �': ` ire - i , r .�' i. {'►r t � ! �r.'r •" 3t' }i r l F 5 x _� 1 A � r rr a •r i r R L\�Q t } Y a' `r-" :r •� t ' : � s ,i�+�� x .r•�F ! F-� �` r�.� 1 ^ r `e�,c�.� .� y.,t s z.'3` >>c ,, �a.i{ A1, cr .r• 'm!,•. -� x -i i \ �rfis - t i . r\ a r.ro- b •y. -F ''�i ? .,• t ; l� [ t h''t ' y4 � `r ' F L a Sl � e ♦ - r [ x � tin q ,f'.+> 'fi � . �'t � TM?s•• u <.c.. T°`4 �• i. hy^, k tiri r . .., 1. ,r+fi S'.t i 1 rti r 1 � '+,t• \ � :b� �a �:a�r •� "`�� r3tr {w�� ,�, a > T,� � '< + >. .,� + • - a ay ' f . J .t, y 1 - J1 �1 •7,�.� a Me '` b�h y � �• e 1�2 ; ) y y l y ���` � >� 7 "'.3: '�• i,,,f , b4 A >.A � ?- .[• >••its� 1 V 3 -i "1 '� i�`� \ a t 7 L x t w � � - 7 _ ♦ •vil _ . ,� x, � tr <•� c tti i . T � .+ M' .. r-- a t.�s ft' t�ls � }x.! vi f.�... .,t _G , r y v. e ��,� > y',� � ,�s, y^ � <�'�rQ�'� �`����' •v t < ; ti r + �_ t ,� .� .�,'c•C ro 'S: .� ti x� ?• _r .,4 D "•P �� u`'t£, `vrTj^ t rA � � i r '�{ �'' � � { � � � } r �: � . '' c ,+ xh t�.� r•S �rt,� e1''� � }••�, �� +,�'>r�. a. ; .�:.. ¢ r a id yr r �� �. '"l�.F �.r„� .7r f � � �'' - :F ae , a ]� t �"'•� ,t %Lry YS rt�r• �_ � '�,'+t,t .: "."1 t,t�• - `` i aa. t - a 4 � �fb ; C r t l t < t � 4, `.+''r't r'..••w'. e '7. L ° .< ^ O * � i`r s,� � .� �t .� • � , i,�a , ^ F�3ft. j '' +Y � = [ r > x M< .f 'P("..r� i s7�-� •� r s� • ��.fi.f .�' l �S•f. 3 •` �3� �,��.. j r r a , �a 1.��."C.� � E<..� ' t`` \: r <. s „' a � 3 t �s+t�,�y� y�,y- '�.`' I � � 't X�r } 7 � � t o � i"' � { Z ••' � { .,' 'k '+9g ��5 �a`l..�. p� :4Y -Y �'r�i'� 'Z_ / -:�a � « s . � r k � _� x - ., FT a � i {. �. r w. ,t ,t/`y 1: '<. �' , .,'' i• �" '1 t'r : _. 4 `b yr _ - t .Y l 7.:. '✓, }_ ��.. }�..� - 11 ''t , t; , s\ �x ,r. � � , ; 1-4 wZ r , ? �_ aa Jx� lrrZ, 'k� Y lf,J e7 l .f.� ' +T� <� � i y l �},.,. � Y 'E 4 � \•,1 1 r �D k t,, h J � },r 7A � r > �� ! 1. I Y T: �Y ,i -! �,'_. > S•. �..3)� y . . � '�. ^I .,,+�..a{t- S ,t �4t�' r t �J , .,i t h .>d - •� ,srt•r� - tr t t d..t •+,.h,"T- l t •ti..+- , c, x ,s �' 1• 4 i'i � � r J • � •y ^4. '"v x � .[ r St f 'r'y�°4 b a + ��++,, � . � (( - ;`tit ? rr � ,' ` .\ fr {.+ to c • , .'t a.• ' �:�,'� ,�"�' ?.��[., � �. �' vt .�}a`'.r' £+eKr � b #, �ayt fii4 ,�,,, , 4 ' .� ., > '} :` E..� \ < r 1+• y . < ri .�..4„ ���`s� .... `"• ')l,� •A � � _ j y 1 t .. v'F T ° a �fi t >` r ail � f+�� i �• +t$ �° 'r < ;��c� 3 � �`'� ' Y . T C, �' r �, .7 f \. ��<i i • 'f„�k ¢!s?j� 67'<`.�7 �r,� r �9.. "� v ..`. a��zed t1i�.e aFp�- '�O �. SUt�1 F 1 � �' >a^ t• {,• r y �t t � t l. .. YS� a t � ?r � � �;� '�,.{, t,t : ' tn,.. � ♦3 5�• �,s ? [.., , ��P��,',, a ,71 ��.,w,.�,. r � •. r, . ' - �` . . >i` �. t J� �' a -ti.+t ..i Al� �`4�', "Piit� .s s� \Z' t : > -;4. •. ' `" •. n i? ; y 7i x r-'' >e .�[ d, '\ ��L�� G t� ' A �� �r }'Yt .} .• n �4n1 - •r ..� \ f f� 1 ,+. � '.'�, ',3 , r R • ,�' � � '`+ t r .H � dab x � . c a.' s• .:., •'F�')rxrr..�r. �.. �Y -� aix ,} 2 e ta xtt f t.A ? ; { �, ' -. 13 pro\ � 1 �.r ��.5 �r v '+!i 5 ,`'ij'�t:y, t.•rf F tit? �f . rus s._ � r ' �,i � f � x ' ^'+• t \ w ..._ . � tt.,, ' ij1' r ��, . .•� { 1 b X at+•J.�'eSCl.[{r„u J ? Yt +.? ti � f3.K + . .. -. r ) vt4 rr: 9'P" - ate- ti+1R yxggtrc J.:. � , asl�'i f;P, - - „•. y,' ,.•55�,.. -. s" �. ':v r• .�. . ,t4 .- �., dn ''S ;,, .ate ±••r,n a. rt'h• ;F -9 ,,. r.., a. .7z ;t r. t� .^•i 't', r .t'•; 's' 7": _t,. ,• =; tF, _ �: ' =� �"- .�- :a a } -tw •-.rk' ' l �i �. "�'k ; ✓ - .fi.:!' tl� .�.i�F. . S ,. ff� • ;t _. h •.:7; :a.Y `A a � - -*�,... :� s ', � , ,.:w � _ •�( : 't : . ti,>!}, .�,','•_ a.. y�".t ,�l - ` J / I t•;;' Y� r tt., a,. . , 'vr - �.. a�.i":. - +�{ } -_ • _ 4xf il. .� " "-:1Y� Cy, �>Y "S•r- 4/VK... .. 7 r Y '�e� Y. et a- °, a.�.' :� C• T•_ �q �` �/ - 4 "a, .'3 a _ .,J, 1 .r' €v �eY is • 3'. > ±fie ,-q,. ..."w r. � t as+.,.r .• .. .. k�::j'{. :'5; 7. •. - s_- y a . -Yf . >...'t. ...Lf A... ._Y -, i._: t .' �ir ::.`_ ,.t:'` -•-.:, r v: l,.t+!•' rte• -"F .d -. t, -.Kr ••c ra.' •y'1��. ..',,n •r. . �� n+, <Y1. 1�l •.'J�• •} a.. • 4� '� .� _ r+ r�.,'3° .,.L. !\Or .k,, ,¢)eY _ ✓t^�'„1 f. ��a {: (r ••� �.•^:•_. -:r ,R •:5L'hw 1n. .;C:,- L�:ti -��a:_ "3< r ' 2'.� IrS., f -. .5. •Yb. s N -• 4.. , ^ :4:a r .'L''' . Yr.: Y,,.aa•. !"{t . t ,) t r . I #..: -• h, ,a ✓r '7s' r��' .y a. y R y� a+a-ti ` -t ^:.n �, •1l. .{r: _ <.;L..'.� • - e: e _T. 4- .2 ar D ,. -. : 7 M,sr µi .wa, a1'r •, k.. 5.h: i.Y>•. ' + ✓�_: .:a. 1.4; ='' O t a '�'4{ w -.♦n{) S n .,�. .� ti' "ta 4 -'t f _:,,yQ q . nt at` < .sc �+•- - `r te . .rf.�..ti• r �/�...`_ .d ,'z z- d. a„• -:..,' - �� }} Ri t :J •>: �.! $ `?.Z s �'k a - s S i v- r l. �� r - Y - lica Lion fo Gambling • ! License ; �:. PP - - :v - 't-rN G :t .*. �.5 ,., j.:r �M. aL ".>: trr ?- t .,: ' �;!i•A . i }'�. - � , *.,Y:.� xat� -•s:: .. iY.l , rt�' • -t' '� :/ yGS�Y i :,-.. _ a "y' '. t .l• 'r ,: "L• .,., •• _.�' Y 2. s'a t 1 :S` `t♦ 'i_ :S' /� �.•' , 11c .j. � �J`:,\a:ra,: .t+ k ,•�1t .t �. i y . _ - , 'i -Y . r., ;i'• •1'Y. .a a •: - . ^} ,T r: .t :1 ; F , ,f , ,yat„ �.�,,al �� r a :•,. r ,.7r �,` �h r-, - - 7 _ c. 11 >.•�..: �:. ni,t {7� :, 9 I , a ! •F _ k : x:47 1 hereby certify that all. statements herein are true and correct to the best ✓ c ; of my knowledge, that this appl ication .is , i accordance. with "applicable - ordinances . and, statutes and that;. i. am .'aut or3, ed to }make, application in behalf of this - eligible or anization. •ry'_.. g °1•i c. �i�', '� .3 ':'+ -,.,� -rran- , rr, J+ r.. ;r, . ti.= 1 � 'C 1-� v j S •+• .. • f (Signature) : S L. CHARLES PETERSON, Treasurer Date November 13, 1980 Mi Subscribed and Sworn before me ' ^;,,' y ' , " Y it � Z r Y- ✓ r " - E 1 .tom c -�• F• ,,g•sr t , • ,a. r , *3:i ; 'v„ � r _ ^ r R: 13th!/ November 9X 80; Notar Publ s h :, l' > �< : , t 1 � .. � 1. J .-• .,.+> ...2 -.�1 4 L :6'i -.. J ,� � aai);h J! r +f• Yv. h - T ,•• _�. /�y�J/- Ifs) •/'/}J� �J /{/ /� - , r - 1 = d 1 :- t `s�'l '�":� `"�,, j��,'(��.at•�..�Vf'+._� .� -. _ •'.1� �./ ► \Qal� �I • Mane = NOTARY pUjL IC MlNNESOT�► M cMSeS COUNTY 0. - \- R Oct. 24,1985 - a -� `fi �, t'. - �: - Y !. r< > ,E•.3r�:�n��' ' �.af.r : - , � >• r - ti x . q., , ,: . t -^ ' v.. :.: • . � '. � , _-.,.L '� s,. ✓.::.. Y '> tG- � aer�rwr'.�.�. �"" .. ' < jr't- .4: .�:V� '.! y. �Y !•+ �" .stir' -!r� .,f.. ^. .;,. . . r.. - � ... a �,,� r, .. {, .3 r + _ s ue,.. ,�;. .�i _ y .: 'to - -r.^ a 1„ '•�,� . F•,.r J � •:.:KZ ?.G Z,CC... -5: ?: :Ir: it :. :rt,- Y_ '.: -" ..' :... ,... .,;. .. .- :.'.. ! . `., Ar. -.s `^'J :ra•= •i'. .a > - • ... 'v ..:. w •�' .,. ,.... - _ f.. � <.�.r, . ; - 'r sl• +S •Y - nits! - h rxt .�w•Ja• Y (:.r :J . Y..' t 'J,. t'J. �' a:? t �. •` : �: rr ; y - 1. r ,i• ..1' ✓ 'n " aa. =i � 3°:S? • r32. 'i,^ �:. 4 ")• : 3. �a 1�: f C '. <\j,:'a ,Sr• r. iU:. '� .(:.ice. W 3 ~ y a .-.! :y;' z-. - k.' $ riti.. N aY '9'. .'Z - .' v w't r+ - i` S' a,. •S9 ra. .,. '^. x :_'n`:.. •1e,'•r - > -ry' .f q _�•i, ,.'�a - . � tY`• #`�„ „' '} r' , .y. . ,r., - ... r : ^;; ,., .. J ++::.::.. 'y' - ::.? ..:.yv.a . v.:. . .r_s ✓. 4e..?.t'�'.. 1 �C'!kr fr.' Fy - }t. U.. .d°; ,���!:".x. -+.s. .7HC'�i a,. J� �'it . - ,'i,>,:dy' J':' �r,t. w, ir,_t r :-i`:: t ,. cS .J•.. ..... : :: .. .- .: .�; , .,. • . .., ....: .. ... ... •1r .... :,>. l Fr ,p1 Aa. 1 � ,/,,,✓ "` 1 - 4 r a.�. X? .q;l� .. �. - �, r ti ? 1 - _ =b .1fi ^-z "'F° _ffFib� .,( - >';c s-• -,. >t , t�. », 1, � ti.. a. _ �3i'� y- - tit ..,- W � • ,r.. �: i - ti.. t.e. -.y ..%�••_:. ,. .'2'rh.'; {-.. .".°a• - t 'L .Y � " {' { •,R'I�if 3-: .x' •.p- .f: .+•f F. .�'. !i _ < l�. ii' >:\1 ' J y s .^'{. . t . �s.•'. C, c.- ;:+n: r. ..+`><e . : e'. n' .y. ,. J+:: ..Q - :-�• ,t, std;':�f T'r. b .i�i�ar �' A .t:. ,.. `s � -ti Z�`. 1 . � <'� a .�_° rr t = :fa s•'{r, 2 e"< .�.: �.. 3`...., r- .�;<: F_ y� } .+w w. .'} .:i A i.` :.t 3'[ ' o'. r„ / - .,{•t'v..:� k, : �' ,I , .1+T2.;..ti ..r'f "'.i':'n f ��((yy i- �4 '.✓ r }„ r,,. AID° t v f'::..y:a'` .'�`• ..:r'' .,y - .:1^: . ✓�' -fit .)` a`. - iS�' Y {:` , r r s • �! '7 � J ��� _• ,..s._:'. - .: ... - -::, .•- :iC`:, ._.. ...:- �,. sn,. y ..>. .. _... ... •? i:'�'v e. .,[ r'"`'. i'�{- r :t ,�7, .. �.-. 'q - • ..`S .o:': f > _,;• -:' a .,r ..- .. fisw. '`y. - .:Y ;p. <.1 r{ �� ! r• ..:.rt..x,f+, .r"%'' � Z t ��'�e t - Y •J.r -.a.t .p,- '.XG ;Y � K. F' a, -d•.:. '-s _N. . +w_� " ,Y: t. :l• =^ 'R •4` yr�+_ a c •••••• - °-;: (. ri - •"-,. V '1 ✓. v'' >' R ' �- �' ;1 •c- •7� ,Y..3' �,:i.sa i +.: -.s - • , :X: ^ ,.. :�. ».. _ _ •'y; a,,. .:l.t A k : �Ka'Ct. . A. - .r .!- ,t.. y,•i - - , t .. , •. #m <? .�.. t «; '.r..' :,+. - y' . ; . -ir • i / s '• Y"ai. r, a•1 J?:r>k �' v "i hl,A'f_ y ".:.,.. - "�... i'i i «;.,.• 7r Y _ r• ti A`A' : W ,� k ., r �'' F T .'? ; t„ ,- _ , .2 a 3� a,,. . .F. � > ry�i. 1 .rr'.. - �Y' , v . Y - .t•r '•7 rr c.:^, .! - - �; ./ .., •r ,-,( .,;>~ •, "' ',", - 3'a; -t /. - • L '� i. :,b ^4 is » : -, ,, :.. , .,,... ..> ....: .. - ,. ... ,, t ., - .. : � ... •.;,r,• r , 4„" .: r � t. .t'. .6 rzt `c''y.' �F- _r t?i'_ x.� • rte. � - ' k , • . • . ,:.. - , - ., - ". � , .. ,. . .r? -,'•. >• :,., t... -'., .., ':,j• t ,o .•i i a4' •1 ..3 _ «t..,�. .r. ..�. Tom. �� ..R: •� .:5. ..6: ^'4 ,,Y .t._�, .r, .... Wit: ,- . • .. , ...., -. ., ..•, , .. N, .. , ..,!` , - � ",:1 r . . +Y�+ •.r;.>.-...... ..Q. - 4 � [ .'•x vw r l•... Jt' ,! %..:�. � "[,.. .✓ XS -; 1�..'R..:L -.i-r^ :: .. 37 ._'j;•. 1 ���t,'. ,A S "l '.7. .1. �. •�: _yv. �y'w'7i ..4,' >�4':� 4 a '4 f+•„ �•''• ,N \J. .it . l t!. 'F. � • - • f . � �> ; ..,L: •.Y :: . . - i i"I -ai` :,. 1^.. ,, }� h 1 X_ _ _ t:' Y •.1 •_'A J • . a. :.tir1 -, y,i. •. -`/ T a•I1" - • 3✓ "ts 'r' to \ - r e _ 'k` 3c " $:: 'a. •>:. y,, c'''' ✓q). ri:✓}• +<. ..1 .4 t t "fir(,:., w� -- , >'• , �`.Y, �.'... �. -., i .. ,:. 1, ;.' •'� t Y S ia ,1 4 ,_„5 • -. i, ,. '._!.. !! .Sl, t . a. '�q ,,,.� 'T'fl •s'- Y }� ;. ._ .. •. •.. �. .. ... -. -.. .- :..•_. -.. .,:. /., ...•.{ ir.' ,{: ' •.A </V:r J4,.! •�[ :'R5y r - "JI., : S. •� t s>r •-: ..^. .,. - . -.: 'j ' "•.M ',.. ,rt �::. ,. :. - ., ,l. t -ti.: a..M •:N. -_ ✓' _pr � � }; �t'4' r�• FCt .<:li� ,,,. l_ •t `b ,i i{E f' y t4. - .•� , • `tI � �. �Mrr._•�•`+' -a�, t :�1:•. �1 .� ' � ,; =Y _..!:t � L a Fes - /f _�• J ^.Y'Y ..,:� ' r :k' i1.. s.r . = �.' f ?G.. +�• r�, ':.r:•,. `}l. . Ca. r•r%t:;:. .i . Z_ :c ? _"$.. •/� 1 }"$c : y , � \.- r. °?f' fi .�,.. t .j:�•.J'T 'fi. { �' ": +P` `7._,s > :,,, .,,.h ;fit. .-v a i :., -� -�SY:, f •JY. ^ k • >. +� w. ,- ',�:� " :,F>�r^ _ .r.>, '-...:- rr--,,ttLL 'c .!. Y �..k ..1 t .�1 r ,.1.• j.. - Y» • :f7 : .,M ,f• t-0a '1• r1rNt} vi .� 1 ,- .. 'i .. .. _- �. .. ..r Y r.�5 .. ,, .. t �.'': !`o „y': o- b - .,a• .Y _ F" -,� °` < :,':1c �;r.. .n." .. a.� al.' r _ •; n •. .. v :-.. - :iid•t"<'..1. „','> .r . is _ .. � __... :: . ,t - •, } ...w .f . ,'►a.- d. to � t .. -'n,:: . -.�. 'r. .. ..: , _.. ,, t..., .. _ , .: ...t..a'i.•'+.`:,- 7, ,'1... . S,' -k•: d' i - -tr y � > . x r r:- tr'..:f. .t..` •i. , .`� - rf,. .. ,.. a .c, f.o- ., .S. :. .. :. a. ..w .. .,_ av `� . J_ ra L n� f ,�'•4. r.�Y+' - � L.=; 4 .a r'.. r ay. - kc' x "s '., 3ir •u. d� � 0. ,}� „ � A. ' r s' 3. �7 • .t.? •.�. - tile �.: `Y, '. ,• :. a. a , ,,. -•S ':..r ... �4 L.ra • ^i: . r.c a. .Aar• .t qC� N:':; - J . :3 r ;a• d... •c. r• .ti . \, : } :``Y,' a." i.: ! %.,✓,i.,- '.d - ' r,"�.''•x , s: • t ^ -f '3, t } ., r � A + � - t 4 r - .; �..�3 ,�, ..�;l .,.! ..Y+ ,Y >;• .,t,. S ..a '.. . a r >; • t::::" t•. -.1.,: .y-. • ^a`r `e' - . P. : n•' . i•, t • .,lh,._ 7 r:. J. f `:. ?�,- .'li, 4 i.3a . , > _ n . : •,.. ;✓ nv C ..�" 'L, .! �i .'`�• , .x <,..� ,f ,�.,:.� %. , x{• ,7 ' �t''r � ci + rS�. :S• +,. 'f.j'''91. 4 t• „ , ✓^: 'f• :.a.. y - . .: � ''(. Y. ay, j a ,t _ - i r _ ,, ..ar'�r.. * ... k �':•e�t+�t .��.. •... a. wu ,. ",eyr7k ',.'�' a1. c. Y' :i�aJ J,,•' ..c x v , :]�k!-r`'• `*� y 1�.� - .G -.. ,.', - 'c ,... .. t •l.tr.. t� . ;__ - >; .. .. .. _. _t r ir.s :ies3' ,c� r �•, l:i t .('y�.� .1. s- ... _. ,. ..t : >. < •-, - `r> r r - . ..?" . r.""' .��: .' irw.L.. ',,i'• -;,.. {k i' s r ��, r y • , � � fib; r �% � t 3 •'v, - •• .,.- - ,. .:t+"w+r. .,, .. ..,:' a .. ....,. S \v,�•• ,r. �t -4 '.+,..'t . a, .•Y � YY. 5R y �{.. : - -,41. -.�. _ . a�.�: a'1. :. f. a.yif '.� �. � LY' ! �•.'< { S "11..,. , rr ':]•.. 7'1�sYe �- + {�V�,,, .� "� Y .i s• . - s. .>7 ,Ya _'„ •- a, 'y `V. ..�: 'rt -: ,)ypy- t'�ti•. fa. :�-K t -_ � .:1k3tr ^r �; - r.. .ti',l '£.,, .}_ ,f ->. _ s i y { _ ' ?., y a _ _ '_.1 ai �i'' "1 ::J '. .1' , .., -,. J1, •t �,. - �4 ( - r r is .'•EF' '�tO. _ e .rti• •.-i. , i. s� J: •' � it •C . 'i„ �:,. : -a-.} . r - r'! F: r, n ;i„ti :4` ..i•� i - - . "��'. rya ,R. t._ .4"'ts.� ✓+•. '•> R... :.(, ,. .rM t { • •ti": -.t. Y :ir+� ,` F � ..'>� 1.-i Jrs..+' .� cY 4 ,.•. 4 -.. "• '12�:: -,. a ,,Y.; Sh.. '•t ' \' , ro:,'r_ r7 '::tio ':\ •r. t .f lal.� , V ".� 1`Y {" t :J• 1 :.,.+ ' :ra H , '1 ...,:• - iwi\: a r.^ vY, r_ f . :t '.r-. ..^T r .:. , 'r "'!� ^', - o. As. w e �e xr.. r ! •1 �t , �'� ` s._,s � .�, '.r* �r e"t'::r>: '.!'• •'✓ y >f - - d. `.- ,1� 'tt ..'fie_ y "..dr _ .l .t:" _,, v r., '?fa s; i� -,a.'. A'! ;! ,vr �- •i 't . t -X :., rfi� • 'a.) MD'ri �µ. , •S' `I� JV -. le: '}' � N f L 0.' r- . l } "".fA, r !•' Y ' 'fY ',�e p r. t \'f ,l _,> • -1,t4" i ,� { aP - N. •' F � L - ..� S '• P t'r .Y �. .�•'. "t .� , n.° rrJ4:j.:' :!: Y. " • .l {. a. . A •�`! "..f• �n n ). �IK..r\�> .•., : tea, �i. ?' 5., :f: •L .s. ' � r: >' S z1', � , k ,,: ^•!• '.J war. .. ).. 'u ¢ , •' -•..,. ... ::.. ,• ;�.. � '.a,'j•c,_1 k... -:,,. ,.k•- .•.,'� ��'r3: :tr>r: t �. •. r'C .. -� . ,.-, �• : . t ,a'. �i}_Lf�.s .r1., Zt^" , a y.... ....k a .. I,. F J f:. '•�'£? i •� :Sy: -,. .. . r. .' fir. .•.. ,- �' - -.r • i. . .. •T . ^rA i A t ,7.. Y ' :.. - '.:- < .. , -: �.. -i.'', ,: .. 1r ':��. Y.''� x Y,trr b Y.v ./ }. ...::1C• Z', .r ., r .,. :. D... ., ti, �' \•.. o en;�,a•. fl >;v t.. ♦.. I. ,1 ^1 ♦ .Y C r .r . 4 . _ - ;t•• J , a .'! ,' G ,r. I' a %... , r.•.� . � . ��. :� : x r,C. s,,t:. r. :ro >'t _�. > ''.f :, •..sb ti.. . A ; ' t l r� • \ _•., ..:.5:'s:.»� t i, 'Y ,,r IK ,.: � i : J' •',�.. •t -r� .a. }s _ 1, • ".\ y'., t :'1' .sir, #,.,.> J ,.{ h ,•. ;T ai.: t ,..,r•4 :>`r' ..t^? - r?r.ri ?\ 2� <_. - : �s �*r � � .�� <a.,..: ..`� a , .c ��. t ...,(J .. \- ,'. % 2'• - fr;, ..SSA .r..7g:�:,u i Y ' `',^d >• ;r•.,o,- 1-•x ,<,.. r., 7• � 'x ;-y, f � f., t: v. .. •'r : .: rr ^i - i ? )aJ >t{'t �' �` ;r t 4r •di;'�.. w..,. . S, �f. •,�, 't , f• . �]... ` r :. +'t +F ,i". F� ti ..r, - �s': 7;' S i �- .Y y• . -�k* r .r r" f.: :i ' S' '•�a'.< i.: rr., .. .� a �'. a•r -., �`i:., +� L' i�•i` :. 5.., +"`t -. ,5' >. ' t-' . 4.. r.3•• i ✓F } Y , L�. .+ .'�: ..� '�. .�, t ' rB!%�, "-;i: {Sti• ;fir; ,4 .. - " yx - , >... .,y i.�4ek N.,,, a A'','Y. :, ��:I^ i ,i�...i.:r !'�!: ::,-. _,..:' - a.. 1-• r< �{w .a ta: .. >. ,.r.. •:a L- A•,u:•f9%.a: LVX:/.ar *.4 'C :+<:ti. G. .t we� -. 'j.• r - �•� , _ ;l• r. f '.; i,t �ti A•!. -•gin. y , 2 f i. ..,.' s ;.. .. ' , ' > , : -`�. . ✓.. � ..FS .•Y:> .y., '. ,. .'C14.. ..P- F✓`1�...R� Pr� •.,r'i'Y q i..� :. iy. a<3 �' .: .M.. r. .'. ,. �. k � ` .7 ''F:' t ' y -i l�. .Y_r 4. - C t {..'�' udM .g,: J ., { -• '� '^' j>: 1 � ti:�' • '�(/-'.�ry _ i fr ItrY - .Ia Y -,• ?\ . �wV• - :• '• '"'�. �,R �.•. F- 'id l% 'Sf " .3.. k .I,. .-� S , t ,.•.. , re'.,,�, aid. .t: J-. ,S -'�. �.� >. - ..,, w •% `t. .!. •7 :rt t x.r. °.{: ,..�a ti ' ^f c.•- +�e! ". r .s , ! 'ter y-: r- }} u Y/ . ` ,. i. it • ',C "�' - {. ._ t q: i , f . > - K�:'. k .rr,: > -:RfY+ f „J., ,4. u S, • • R '` ,�, r - ��• �� � y 8 t „� t v i i r c .� � J a . q : ?t ., .. '.. :, ,. , ; ,,. .. :. ', :. •:,,.° : ,:• : ..:. ., r :* rt+. .:�< :. k ''7 f. i t : `' a i ,{ u ./.; c.; . ✓aR ^f o i 3„ ,. �-�':, . > . . . .. y '' - , .•. r,rr. ....;. ,, ..r„ .rr•., ,: e' ..•+.Ris�?tr ". .'Jrii nrt �: +;�.' �• . 'r. r'+ •' - C f .4 '.H'� ,�'.'>?f ."�,, ^y �, :, ? ar d t � � v. - : • a oa` _ .' ' rk :• r� .. - I'ti - .. i „ l'a Y. ^-S. ro :'. }r . t is r � •.w.• _. .. _ �.. t•. .� ... ."...r. :w.- ••f• «y +^ -•�i. Y- °+k7F iA`r' '_A`r' '+w'.,}. Jam,' .::. .�. .. a ... ,..•,++r,.,..r•'f► k,,: X ` �F f Y. ,r •_� .. �,; * '•� t _ GtW AIVERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY B O N D .,r Bond No. 2 37 43 17 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That L. Charles Peterson of Maplewood, Minnesota , as Principal, and GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and exist- ing under the laws of the State of Ohio and authorized to transact a corporate surety business. in the State of Minnesota, as Suretir are `jointly and severally held and firmly bound unto N. E. Metro Area Alanon, 1954 Hazelwood, Maplewood, Minnesota in the sun, of ' JEN THOUSAND AND NO / 100---- - - - - -- ----------------- DOLLARS lawful money of the United States, to the payment whereof, well and truly to be made, we hereby bind ourselves, and each of our heirs, ex- ecutors, administrators, successors and assigns, firmly by these pre- sents. WHEREAS, The said Principal was duly elected or appointed to the office or position of gambling man for the term beginning October 2-5 . 1 1980 and ending October 2 6. 198§ NOW, THEREFORE, The condition of this obligation is such, that if said Principal shall well and truly perfor. all the duties of his said office or position, and account for all funds coming into his hands by virtue of his said office or position as required by law, then this obligation shall be null and void; otherwise to be and remain in full force and virtue. THIS BOND, is executed and delivered to be effective only upon the following express conditions, which shall be conditions precedent to .the right of recovery hereunder: FIRST, If the Surety shall so elect this Bond shall be cancelled by giving thirty (30) days notice in writing to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota and this Bond shall be deemed cancelled at the expiration of said thirty (30) days, the Surety remaining liable for all or any act or acts cover- ed by this Bond, which may have been committed by the Principal up to the effective date of such cancellation, subject to the terms, condi- tions and provisions of this Bond. SECOND, The liability under this Bond shall commence from October 26 - 19 0 and the Surety hereunder shall in no event be held liable in respect to any act or acts of the said Principal committed prior to the said date or for any shortage existing prior to the said date, or for funds or property used or applied towards such shortage. Signed, sealed and dated this 10th day of 0ctob , 1980. C L. Charles Peterson Principal GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY a 4,, yn al-) JoAnn M. Myer Att ney -in -Fact '.14037a (LONG) - 2-72 t • • °` GUM AIVER1C -XN INSURANCE COMPANY BOND Bond No. 2 37 43 17 KN(V ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That L. Charles Peterson of _ Maplewood, Minnesota , as Principal, and GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and exist- ing under the laws of the State of Ohio and authorized to - transact a corporate surety business in the State of Minnesota, as Surety, are Jointly and severally held and firmly bound unto N. E. Metro Area Alanon 1954 Hazelwood, Maplewood, Minnesota _ in the sum of TEN THOUSAND AND NO 100 -.. -a- --ft($10,000.00)• . .- •. Oft" . DOLLARS lawful money of the United States, to the payment whereof, well and truly to be made, we hereby bind ourselves, and each of our heirs, ex- ecutors, administrators, successors and assigns, firmly by these pre- sents. WHEREAS, The said Principal was duly elected or appointed to the office or position of gambling manager for the term beginning October 25 19$0 and ending October 26 1980 NOt1, THEREFORE, The condition of this obligation is such, that if said Principal shall well and truly perforn all the duties of his said office or position, and account for all funds coming into his hands by virtue of his said office or position as required by law, then this obligation shall be null and void; otherwise to be and remain in full force and virtue. THIS BOND, is executed and delivered to be effective only upon the following, express conditions, which shall be conditions precedent to the right of recovery hereunder: FIRST, If the Surety shall so elect this Bond shall be cancelled by giving thirty (30) days notice in writing to the City of Maplewood. Minnesota _ and this Bond shall be deemed cancelled at the expiration of said thirty (30) days, the Surety remaining liable for all or any act or acts cover- ed by this Bond, which may have been committed by the Principal up to the effective date of such cancellation, subject to the terms, condi- tions and provisions of this Bond. SECOND, The liability under this Bond shall commence from October 25 . 1980 and the Surety hereunder shall in no event be held liable in respect to any act or acts of the said Principal committed prior to the said date or for any shortage existing prior to the said date, or for funds or property used or applied towards such shortage. Signed, sealed and dated this 1_ 0th day of October 1980. Le Charles Paterson Principal GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY JoAnn Me. Myer Attorney -in -Fact I s.14037A (LONG) - 3.72 J1 GUW ANER1C -%N INSURANCE COMPANIES STATE OF COUNTY OF �a On this day of , in the year 19 , before me personally come(s) , to me known and known to me to be the person(s) who (is) (are) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledge(s) to me that he executed the same. NOTARY PUBLIC ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PRINCIPAL (Partnership) STATE OF ss.: COUNTY OF On this day of , in the year 19 , before me personally come(s) , a member of the co- partnership of to me known and known to me to be the person who is described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledges to me that he executed the same as and for the act and deed of the said co- partnership. NOTARY PUBLIC ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PRINCIPAL (Corporation) STATE OF ss.: COUNTY OF 1 On this day of , in the year 19 , before me personally come(s) to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides in the City of that he is the of the the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of the said corporation; that the seal affixed to the said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by the order of the Board of Directors of said corporation, and that he signed his name thereto by like order. NOTARY PUBLIC ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SURETY STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY I ss.: On this 10th day of October in the year 119 , before me personally come(s) JoAnn M. Myer Attorney(s) -in -Fart of GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY with whom 1 am personally acquainted, and who, being by me duly sworn, says 'that he reside(s) in St. Paul, Minnesota that he is (are) the Attorneys) -in -Fact of GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY the company described in and which executed the within instrument; that he know(s) the corporate seal of such Company; ,and that the seal affixed to the within instrument gQ(QQ V#X*a1 and that it was affixed by order of the Board of Directors , of said Company, and that bA *iW d I stru eptak s) -in -Fact of the said Company by like order. % C. .I �;•' - =' ., ^ L1C— h11t3t COU td 16,19 ~�'-"' t � �,mtl'►:.i'�� tx►'��`'' y NOTARY PUBLIC F.9723-3-76 PRINTED IN ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PRINCIPAL (Individual) GW.AT AIVERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY The number of persons authorized by this power of attorney is not more than No. 0 11370 THREE POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a.corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Ohio, does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint the person or persons named below its true and lawful attorney -in -fact, for it and in its name, place and stead to execute in behalf of the said Company, as surety, any, and all bonds, undertakings and contracts of suretyship, or other written obligations in the nature thereof; provided that the liability of the said Company on any such bond, undertaking or contract of suretyship executed under this authority shall not exceed the limit stated below. Name Address Limit of Power JOANN M. MYER ALL OF ALL CAROL R. MUELLER ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA UNLIMITED BONITA J. VAN EMMERIK This Power of Attorney revokes all previous powers issued in behalf of the attorneys) -in -fact named above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY has caused these presents to be signed and attested by its appropriate officers and its corporate seal hereunto affixed this 16th day of Apri 1 19 80 Attest GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY STATE OF OHIO, COUNTY OF HAMILTON — ss: On this 16th day of Apri 1 , 1980 , before me personally appeared ROBERT M. SCHUDER, to me known, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resided in Cincinnati, Ohio, that he is the Vice President of the Great American InsuranL Company, the Company described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seal; that it was so affixed by authority of his office under the By -Laws of said Company, and that he signed his name thereto by like authority. This Power of Attorney is granted by authority of the following resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of Great American Insurance Company by unanimous written consent dated August 20, 1979. RESOL VED: That the President, the several Vice Presidents and Assistant Vice Presidents, or any one of them, be and hereby is authorized, from time to time, to appoint one or more Attorneys -In -Fact to execute in behalf of the Company, as surety, any and all bonds, undertakings and contracts of suretyship, or other written obligations in the mature thereof, to prescribe their respective duties and the respective limits of their authority; and to revoke any such appointment at any time. 1 RESOL VED FURTHER: That the Company seal and the signature of any of the aforesaid officers may be affixed by facsimile to any power of attorney or certificate of either given for the execution of any bond, undertaking, contract or suretyship, or other written obligation in the nature thereof, such signature and seal when so used being hereby adopted by the Company as the original signature of such officer and the original seal of the Company, to be valid and binding upon the Company with the same force and effect as though manually affixed CERTIFICATION I, W. R. Bily, Secretary of the Great American Insurance Company, do hereby certify that the foregoing Power of Attorney, and the Resolutions of the Board of Directors of August 20, 1979 have not been revoked and are now in full force and effect. Signed and sealed this 10th day of October '19 80. S -1029G —12/79 Printed in U.S.A. APPLICATION FOR MEMBERSHIP .wx a ' MAPLEWOOD HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION In submitting this application for membership to the Maplewood Human Relations Corm -- nission, I state my commitment to Human Relations and, further, dedicate my time and capabilities to fulfill this goal. Signature of Applicant Applicant: Please return this application to: Secretary, Maplewood Human Relations Commission, 1380 Frost Ave., Maplewood, Minnesota 55109. This application will be reviewed by the M.H.R.C. and recommendations for membership forwarded to the Maplewood Village Council for final approval. NAME Patricia A. Williamson DATE 10/31/80 ADDRESS 521 Ferndale AGE (if less than 18) Maplewood, MN 55119 TEL. 373 -0274 (o) 738 -6953 EDUCATION Graduate of Lady Margaret's Grammar School, London, England . (cont'd over pa 2e) PRESENT OCCUPATION & EMPLOYER Administrator, Dept of Curriculum & Instruct College of Education, University of Minnesota, Mp ls, MN COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES AND ORGANIZATIONAL MEMBERSHIPS: `'Why I would like to be a member of the M. H. R. C. " I feel it would be a worthwhile community commitment. I see the Commission as a mechanism for citizen input which can positively influence human rights in the city of Maplewood. "Y - PPLICATION FOR MEMBERSHIP MAPLEWOOD HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION In submitting this application for membership to the Maplewood Human Relations Commission, I hereby state my commitment -to Human Relations and, further, dedicate my time and capabilities to fulfill this goal. Signature of pi i cant Applicant: Please return this application to: Secretary, Maplewood Human Relations Commission, 1380 Frost Avenue, Maplewood, *Minn. 55109. This application will be reviewed by the M.H.R.C. and recommenda- tions for membership forwarded to the Maplewood City Council for final approval. NAME - S. DATE�f ADDRESS (� 1-- -tJ6 �, AGE (i f v � 1 ess than i 8 EDUCATION PRESENT OCCUPATION 8 EMPLOYER COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES AND ORGANIZATIONAL MEMBERSHIPS: b k "Why I would like to be a member of the M.H.R.C." co .4: J. Fe j ec�L t F� M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Manager FROM Director of Community . Development Aotion by Co ncli SUBJECT: Rezoning LOCATION: West of Keller Lake, East of Arcade Street APPLICANT: Council Initiated DATE: July 30, 1980 Rejen�;, _ _.... Da e ---- ---- -� .v_ Request Rezone an existing larger lot single family neighborhood from R -1, Residential District (sing.le dwelling) to R -E (30), Residential Estate District. Site Description Location: Refer to enclosed maps Parcel Size: 35 acres, consisting of 32 lots with a median area of 41,730 square feet. Lot areas range from a low of 11,250 to a high of 110,300 square feet. Existing Land Use: 27 single family homes and accessory buildings. Two existing parcels, 2150(A) and Lot A, 'may be develop- ed under present minimum area requirements. Proposed Land Use Single family dwellings and accessory buildings. The minimum lot area for future lot divisions would be increased to 30,000 square feet. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Highway 36 Easterly: Keller Lake Southerly: Ramsey County Open Space Westerly: Arcade Street. Across the street, single family dwellings and a park, zoned R -1, Residential District (single family) and planned RL, Residential Low Density. 1. December 21, 1972: Council approved a lot division for Mr. Harmon at 2138 Arcade, resulting in two lots of about 1 acre in area each. These lots have since been recombined. 2. August 1975: Voya Piletich applied for a lot division which would have created a 14,000 square foot lot. Although smaller in area,'thi's lot was to have been located on the same site as Lot A (see enclosed Property Line Map). 3. September 18, 1975: Council tabled Mr. Piletich's request until staff could prepare an overall development plan for this area. 4. November 20, 1975: Council adopted the following policy for development west of Keller Lake, east of Arcade Street, north of Rosel awn Avenue, and south of Highway 36: Minor additional development will be permitted limited to using existing streets and requiring full compliance with exist -. i ng City Codes as to lot width, area, frontage on improved streets,, and similar requirements. Council then voted to deny the proposed lot division, due to the fact that the proposed lot was smaller than - i s predominant in the area. Council added that they would be. willing to consider a lot division making that lot a somewhat larger one. 5. December 4, 1975: Council approved a lot division for 2140 Arcade, creating lots of 41,730 and 40,170 square feet. 6. May 20, 1976: Council approved a lot division creating a lot of approximately 30,000 square feet in the southeast corner of Mr. Piletich's property, presently 21282 Arcade Street. A deed was -not filed for this split. 7. January 18, 1979: Council approved a lot d i v i s i o n for Voya Pi 1 eti ch , creating a lot of 16,500 square feet at 2128 Arcade. 8. July 27, 1979: Staff approved a lot division for Voya Pi 1 eti ch at 2028'2 Arcade, creating a lot of 26,140 square feet. Council had approved a similar spl i t for approximately the same lot on May 20, 1976. 9. April 17, 1980: Council conditionally approved a lot division and variance for Voya Piletich at 2130 Arcade Street, creating a 35,000 square foot lot without direct access to Arcade Street. This action was subject to the following conditions: a. Payment of required cash connection charges b. An easement shall be provided to access the parcel c. A recordable deed shall be filed against the remnant parcel tat:wold quit Claim the right to build without specific approval of the City Council. A deed has not been recorded for this lot. 10. April 17, 1980: Council requested staff to research the feasibility of establishing a Residential. Estate District, with a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet for the neighborhood east of Arcade Street and west of Keller Lake. 11. June 25, 1980: Staff approved a lot di for Voya Pi 1 eti ch, creating a 20,430 square foot lot north of 2128 Arcade. (See Lot A on enclosed Property Line Map.) 4 . Planning _ 1. Land Use Plan Designation: RL, Residential Low Density, not to exceed 14 persons per net acre. This neighborhood has substantially less density than allowed because of the long, narrow lots. -2- 2. Zoning: R -1, Residential District (single dwelling). The minimum lot size in this zone is 10,000 square feet. 3. Housing Plan Policy: a. Page 31 (Proposed Plan), Maintain and where necessary strengthen the character of individual neighborhoods. b. Page 45, All housing should respect established housing values of the area in which it is located to the degree that human values, natural beauty and urban amenities are not sacrificed. c. Page 48, The community should develop land -use regulations which encourage a planned approach to housing areas by providing a variety of lot sizes and housing densities which complement the area's land use plan and the desired dwelling types. .4. Code Provisions: Section 915.030.of City Code states that where the "govern- ing body is required to consider an exception or change in the zoning ordinance or .map in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance, it shall, among other things: 1. Assure itself that the proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance 2.. Determine that the proposed change will not substantially change, injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded 3. Determine that the proposed change will serve the best interests of the Village, the convenience of the community (where applicable), and the publ i c wel f are. " Citizen Comments Staff surveyed the 30 property owners who would be directly affected by a re- zoning. The survey suggested 30,000 square feet as a minimum lot area for future lot divisions in the neighborhood. Of the 19 responses received, 16 or 84% were in favor of increasing the present minimum Tot area. Of those in favor of an increase, 12 agreed with the suggested 30,000 square foot minimum, one felt that 20,000 square feet would be more appropri- ate, and three felt that 50,000 square feet would be a minimum more in keeping with the existing character of the neighborhood. Citizen comments received were: prefer a larger.lot area than 30,000 square feet s - . remaining undeveloped land is not suitable for.developmdnt and should be preserved for wildlife - a minimum of 30,000 square feet would ruin this area, reducing it to a devel opment area - the minimum lot area should be no smaller than the average area (46,550 -3- square feet) of existing lots An increase in minimum lot area is needed to preserve the character of the existing neighborhood the suggested minimum is way too large a 300% increase in required size is unreasonable The main objection to this rezoning comes from voya Pi l eti ch ( 2130 Arcade) . He has proposed to divide his property as shown on the enclosed _ map titled proposed property l i ne map (1980) . The lots proposed by Mr. Pi lets ch would all be over 30,000 square feet and would, therefore, not be affected by thi s rezoni ng. Mr. Pi 1eti ch' -s ob jecti ons to the rezoning creates some suspicions that he is actually intending to develop the enclosed 12 lot plat he proposed in 1978. Analysis . The primary issue in considering a rezoning of this-neighborhood is-whether or not it is in the public interest to protect the neighborhood's existing large lot characteristics. Of 19 potentially affected property owners, 16 agreed that an increase in minimum lot area was not only desirable, but necessary to protect their investments over time. For example, since 1972, the City has approved seven lot splits in the neighborhood. Three of these requests involved the creation of lots less than 30,000 square feet in area, ranging from 16,500 to 26,430 square feet. If the minimum lot area requirement remains at 10,000 square feet, approximately 16 lots have the potential of being created. If the minimum i•.ere to be increased to 30,000 square feet, the potential for additional lot creation would be reduced to approximately 4 lots. The following parcels would be involved i n the *creation of these lots: Additional Lots Minimum Minimum Address 10,000 Square Feet 30,000 Square Feet 2190 1 1 2150 (C,D,)* 2 0 2140* 2 0 Lot B* 10 3 2080 1 . 16 4 *Improved interior access must be provided An increase in minimum lot area appears to be consistent - with City policy calling for the maintenance and strengthening of the character of existing neighborhoods. Finally, the Council has adopted a policy that only. minor additizonal development, which .uti 1 i zes existing streets, w i l l be permitted in this nei g�borhood. An increase in minimum required lot area would be consistent with this polity. Recommendation Approval of a rezoning frog R -1, Residential District (single family) to R -E (30), Residential Estate for an area bounded to the west by Arcade Street, the north by Highway 36, the east by Keller Lake and the south by Ramsey County Open Space. 4 This recommendation is based upon the following findings: 1. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the intent of the RE district Z. The proposed change will protect and enhance the character of the existing neighborhood 3. The proposal is in the public interest as it is consistent with City policy 4Z A minimum lot area of 30,000 square feet is desired by a majority of the affected property owners surveyed - Location Map Property Line Map Division proposed by Mr: "Pile tich (1980) Proposed Plat (1978) -5- Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment on the proposed zone change Property owner at 2134 Arcade Street, said he wished to keep the area unique. He was -in favor of the 30,000 square foot lots. Ron Owens, 2010 Arcade, is against applying the RE district to this neighborhood. He would not like to see his property being restrict to. prevent 20,000 square foot lots. Mark Fenner, 2128 Arcade, this is a unique area, some action has to be taken beyond the 10,000 square foot minimum. He questioned if Mr. Pi l eti ch could explain his intentions' for development of the property. Voya Pi i eti ch, 2130 Arcade, discussed the past . divisions of h_i s property. He also said the right -of -way has been dedicated to the City for the street. He said the plat that was presented to the City was developed as a result of a request by the. previous planner for - the City. At this time, he does not propose *to pursue the plat and develop the plat. He was not in favor of the new zoning district or the proposal to change the zoning on his property to RE District. Mr. Bi ebi ghauser, reviewed some of the history of the property in the area. Mr. Grant said they do not wish to have the area develop into a Piece-meal division. Commissioner Kishel said because of the area being unique, he is in favor of the R -E (30) zoning district Commissioner Kishel moved the Planning Commission recommend to the Ci t Counci 1 rezoni n of R -1 to R -E 30 for an area boun a tote west b Arcade Street, the north b y Highway 36, the east by Keller Lake and t he south by Ramsev County Open Space. This recommendation is based upon - the followinq findi I. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the intent of the RE Di str' � ct 2. The proposed change will protect and enhance the character of the existing neighborhood 3. The proposal is in the publ i s interest as it is consistent with City policy. 4. A minimum lot area of 30,000 square feet is desired by.,a majority of the affected property owners surveyed. Commi ss i ones Whitcomb seconded . Commissioner Pell ish said the establishing of the R -E (30t d'istr -ict for this area would not prevent platting of the property as long as it would meet the mi nimum requirements. Voting: Ayes - all. 6 8 -4 -80 Gervols LOA* -- Loke --- ` 4. - ------------ - ---- K O H L M A N A 23 ROAD Z • W � W Q J � < 22 . 61 in 9 5E r r r v N z ELDRtOGE � M wl < dElt�IONT LA. : KI V 58 At I z < o MT. VERNON AVE. r W AVE. W ST. PAUL I ELDRI aEL� s +ctLt. �0 30 IlFln3ll CITY COUNCIL LPETITIONER.. ZONE CHANGE REQUEST Q a 1 i I1 ADDRESS' 2200 2190 2180 2170 2168 2160 2158 2150 2144 2142 2140 2138 2134 2130 212x2 A B 2128 2126 2112 2100 2090 2080 2060 2050 2048 2020 2010 2008 TOTAL LOTS — 32 MEDIAN AREA MEAN. AREA LOT AREA 33 sq. ft. 98,450 87 22,220 15,250 72 21,780 11,250 34 22,300 1.9 , 7 6 0 33 41 40,170 82 ,400 83 68,440 26 ,140 20,430 110,300 16,500 47 47,040 76,230 60,110 39,640 53 36,160 43 43 60,110 20,470 1,489,650 sq. ft. 41,730 sq. ft. 46,550 sq. ft. CITY COUNCIL PETITIONER ., LUNL CHANGE [ REQUEST 2. PROPERTY LINE MAP _ - `•' - 2 200 , . ,k-,P,, 1, nr, P Jr 0..:,f IV 2190 KELLER •� �:_:_:__ LAKE ' = 2180 I* L! - 1 1 Sne S 2170 216 1 , t•) c . 1 t — TT — — ..s �`. , It 2150�� t i. r < `2140 �� ' 2142 s' 2138 2134 1 A' 130 m i 2 8 al ' 21282 2126 \ \M AL \ ') 2112 =200 - ....., 1 :T c. -2080 c i �... % 2060, t 1• r .0. Awwt• 20 0' T , 2043 � • � . Cf1UN� v •-•t 1 h +• , J '2008 ' 2010. %%.% »� t 7 1-04 r F a , A _-i 1 i I1 ADDRESS' 2200 2190 2180 2170 2168 2160 2158 2150 2144 2142 2140 2138 2134 2130 212x2 A B 2128 2126 2112 2100 2090 2080 2060 2050 2048 2020 2010 2008 TOTAL LOTS — 32 MEDIAN AREA MEAN. AREA LOT AREA 33 sq. ft. 98,450 87 22,220 15,250 72 21,780 11,250 34 22,300 1.9 , 7 6 0 33 41 40,170 82 ,400 83 68,440 26 ,140 20,430 110,300 16,500 47 47,040 76,230 60,110 39,640 53 36,160 43 43 60,110 20,470 1,489,650 sq. ft. 41,730 sq. ft. 46,550 sq. ft. CITY COUNCIL PETITIONER ., LUNL CHANGE [ REQUEST 2. PROPERTY LINE MAP _ - COUNTY ROAD B 0 2.rr. z LA J ax, 0 ?_5 5 L V VOYA PILETICH PETITIONER REQUEST Propert Line Division proposed. b Mr Piletich (1980) Mr'. Piletich's propert is shaded Existin homes I Y:) ZIZ6 0 n ( - 30 co __, c 3 L -3 �r_ 4 bl. 5 Q CL (S-6—B) 01 in Y. - S7�.SC o � -• ° 5° vv o + CL S CITY O F ST. PX U L 1� COUNTY or KAM5Elf Q 7L) VOYA PILETICH PETITIONER REQUEST Propert Line Division proposed. b Mr Piletich (1980) Mr'. Piletich's propert is shaded Existin homes NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE Notice is hereby given that the Maplewood City Council will conduct a public hearing on Thursday, September 18, 1980 at 7:45 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Maplewood Municipal Building located at 1380 Frost Avenue. The purpose of said hearing shall be for the City Council to publicly hear and consider all remakrs regarding a petitioned change in zoning district classification.filed by: APPLICANT: REQUESTED ZONING CLASSIFICATION: EXISTING ZONING CLASSIFICATION: PROPOSED REZONE AREA: City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota R -E (30 ), Residential Estates District R -1, Single Dwelling Residence North of Ramsey County .Open Space, East of Arcade Street, 'West of Keller Lake, and south of Highway 36. ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER ARE INVITED TO ATTEND AND BE HEARD Commissioner Pellish moved -an amendment to condition 1. a. of the preliminary plat, in lieu of the words "chain link fence ", insert " or such other suitable methods as the Director of Community Services approves —^ Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes * -- al l Voting on the motion as amended: Ayes 9 Nays - 1 (Chairman Axdahl ) E. Zoning Amendment RE District Secretary Olson said the purpose of the amendment is to establish a zone that would provide protection for larger lot, single family neighborhoods from subdivision, which would result in lots that-would be out of character with the neighborhood. Commissioner Hejny asked if the residents in the area of Keller Lake had requested this type of zoning. Secretary Olson said this is a result of the public hearing on Mr. Pi Teti ch's property. Chai rriian Axdahl asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment on the proposal. Gordon Grant, 2134 Arcade Street, said he was in favor of the proposed ordinance. Maria Larsen 2001 Duluth Street, said if this is to protect existing large lot properties she would be in favor of it. She does not want it restricting lot sizes so people of low and moderate income -could not build in Maplewood. - (Mrs . Larsen is representing :the Maplewood HRA) y Ron Owens, 2010 Arcade, spoke regarding the development of larger lots for single family homes. Carl Biebighauser, Arcade Street, was ' in favor of 'the proposed ordinance for larger lots Voya Pi Teti ch, 2130 Arcade, thought it would be appropriate to use the larger lot requirements just in new development areas. Not in areas where some of the lots are already at the 10,000 square feet. Commissioner Barrett roved that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the proposed Zoning Code Amendment for th : establishment of an RE, Residence 'Estate District as outlined in Staff's report dated June 24, 1980 Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes - all.' _ F. Rezoning - East of Arcade Street to RE) Secretary Olson said this is a proposal for rezoning to RE, Residence Estate District for the area east of Arcade Street. 5 8 -4 -80 ' r TO: FROM: DATE: MEMORANDUM City Manager ���; � err• nj0 � . _. t40_ . r Director of Public Works October 8, 1980 FEASIBILITY STUDY - PROJECT 80 -3 RIPLEY AVENUE WATERMAIN, WEST OF EDGERTON Attached is a feasibility report concerning the above referenced project. It is recommended the report be excepted and a public hearing be scheduled for November 20, 1980. a FEASIBILITY STUDY WATERMAIN IN RIPLEY FROM EDGERTON ST. PROJECT NO. 80 -3 This report investigates the feasibility of providing watermain along Ripley Avenue from Edgerton Street to approximately 530 feet west. This study is made as the result of a petition and as a condition set down by the Council before final plat approval of the Clausen Addition. The developer anticipates constructing his own internal plat improvements. The area in question is zoned single family residential south of Ripley Avenue and the north side is zoned as farm land. The property along the street is served by sanitary sewer facilities in place. The petitioner is interested in providing watermain to a proposed cul -de- sac north of Ripley Avenue. An 8 inch watermain is proposed in conformance with the City's utility plan. This main will connect with existing water utilities in Edgerton Street and terminate'at a point approximately 530 feet west of the connection. Trenching for the proposed watermain necessitates road- way restoration in Ripley Avenue. Given the present road- -2- way width and implementing safe trenching standards, it is deemed advisable to consider bituminous restoration in kind of one -half the roadway over the length of t t he proposed project. No upgrading of street or storm-water drainage system is proposed. The total estimated cost for watermain improvement is $24,300 with an assessment rate of $20 against a total assessable front footage of 609 feet. This generates a deficit of $12,700 for the City. There is an additional cost of $600 per water connection. The improvements are feasible from an engineering stand- point and can best be accomplished as outlined in this report. I J 1- v C H C U. C : Proposed 8� � D. I . P. Existing 8 P. W i r Cf) �i Z O H W (9 O W 3 3 3 I L PROJECT 80 -3: WATERMAIN IN RIPLEY Scale i = 200 FROM EDGERTON ST. Date N UTILITIES MAP 8- 14- ROSELAWN AVE. CLAusEN ADDITION _j X;us rL A iTN so- NN % N-1j, 0" U-6 17 N- game dol —` _ — �. ; l — —�: ,� ; % 0 Ay its IN, sue &LL "-met 100' op • ` ��/ � ice:. � Z ! Q 1 j 30 ta ;00 l o o, tAo— IL JW scale PRELIMINARY PLAT — ADDITION Date: ' 1 MEMORANDUM f -- 3 TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development = OCATION: South of Radatz Avenue /West of White Bear Avenue APPLICANTS: Granite City Construction Co. R and R Investors Realty Development Services, Inc. 01 -IN ER: Ajax Venture Co.. PROJECT: Maple Knoll DATE: October 30, 1980 Request The _- appl_i- -cants are - reques -ti ng f -nal approval of a planned unit development for 57 apartment units. Existing Land Use 1. The subject site consists of portions of three parcels of land. 2. Parcel A on enclosed map #2 is a 14.84 acre parcel with approximately 425 feet of frontage on White Bear Avenue. Only the westerly 10.69 acres is to be used for the subject project. The applicant proposes to split off the easterly portion, retaining only a permanent roadway easement to White Bear Avenue. The property is undeveloped, except for a house and accessory buildings fronting on White Bear Avenue. 3. Parcel B is an undeveloped .25 acre parcel with 55 feet of frontage on Radatz Avenue. The proposal does not include this parcel. 4. Parcel C is not part of the land area designated for the project. However, the applicant proposes two easement corridors across parcel C from the PUD to Southl awn Drive (to be constructed) for a roadway and u t i l i t i e s . The parcel is undeveloped, except for a single family home fronting on Radatz Avenue. Proposal The project would create 57 apartment units with the following bedroom mix: 5 ­1 1 bedroom units -s 32 - 2 bedroom units 20 - 3-bedroom units 57 - UNITS TOTAL I .�i I 2. There would also be an additional management /laundry unit. 3. The units would be subsidized Section 8 family units. 4. Each unit would have a patio and a 144 cubic foot exterior storage shed. 5. There are 115 parking stalls. Fifty -eight spaces are garag_ and 57 are open spaces. City Code requires 114 stalls, of which 57 mu. be garages. 61 Two tot lots and a basketball court are planned. r P 3 7. See the enclosed site plan (Map 3) for location of units. Surrounding Land Uses 1. North: Single family homes fronting on Radatz Avenue. 2. East: White Bear Avenue. 3. South: Wetlands, zoned 'F, Farm Residential and designated on the Plan for. Open Space use. 4. West: See item 4 under Existing Land Use Past Actions 1. 5- 11 -72: The City Council denied a PUD for the entire 15 acre arcel . The PUD proposed a high rise, P P P g four 3 story apartments, an office building, and commercial development. 2. 6- 21 -75: The City Council reviewed a proposal by Ramsey County for acquisition of various properties adjacent to Ditch 18 for drainage as well as open space. As a part of this program, the County included the westerly 2/3 of the subject property. The City approved the overall County project and further recommended the inclusion of the easterly 1/3 of the property. Ramsey County subsequently • did not include this additional five acres in the Ditch 18 program. 3. 7- 17 -75: The City Council denied a rezoning from F, Farm Residence to BC, Business Commercial of the 5.3 acres of the subject property fronting on White Bear Avenue. Council denied the zone change based on the following findings: a. The proposed zoning would be contrary to the land use designation indicated in the Comprehensive Plan b. The implied commercial development would be out of keeping with the land use r limitations that were intended by the Comprehensive Plan. z c. The implied commercial development of extensive retail operation would be • premature in terms of development of adjacent areas and avai 1 abi 1 i ty of public services and this would compound the existing traffic congestion. 4 d. The zoning request is potentially detrimental to the presently existing single family nature of the adjacent areas. 2 e. The a v a i l a b i l i t y of other business commercial areas be looked at. f. It is felt that an LBC or CO classification most closely conforms to the LSC indicated in the Maplewood Plan and, therefore, it is recommended that such classification be considered. 4. 6- 21 -76: The Planning Commission considered a spe.ci al use .permit for Ajax Venture Company to develop._ a 15 acre parcel with a four . ry office structure _ and a 140 unit apartment building. The Commission recomm ded to the City Council approval as a Planned Unit Development concept, an further approval be required, based on the following findings: Y- .ir 3 a. That the applicant's proposal is within the RL density. 1 . b. That the proposed development does not conflict with either proposed Rm or the existing R -1 zoning on Radatz. c. The office building is in accordance with the LSC designation. d. A sizable area would be dedicated as open space. 5. 8- 15 -77: The Planning Commission considered a new plan for 72 apartments in six and eight unit buildings, with a four story office building on White Bear Avenue. The Comrli ss i on directed Staff to prepare a modification to the RL and possibly Rm definitions of the Comprehensive Plan. 6. 12 -8 -77: The City Council approved an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan that established a new RLE District. (See Planning Considerations). 7. 2 -2 -78: The City Council amended the Land Use Plan for the west eleven acres of the subject property from RL, Low Density Residential to RLE, Low Density Residential Extended. 8. 2- 28 -78: The County Board deleted this parcel from their open space acquisition program. 9. 2- 15 -79: Counci 1 approved a preliminary Planned Unit Development for 57 townhouse apartments as follows: a. The project would be consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan. b. The units are of a scale, design, and location that is compatible with adjacent single family homes. Approval was based on the following- conditions: Z. a. No building permits shall be issued, unless Council orders the following public improvement projects: 1. A minimum eight inch water main in Radatz Avenue, looped through Maple i Knoll and Southi awn Drive to Beam Avenue. g . _s r 2. Upgrading of Radatz Avenue from White Bear Avenue to proposed Southl awn Drive. 3 3. Construction of Southlawn Drive from Radatz Avenue to Beam Avenue. 4. Construction of the storm water project shown in the Maplewood Drainage Plan for Radatz Avenue. All necessary easements shall also be dedicated to the City. This project includes piping, ponding, and control devices b. Occupancy permits shall not be issued, unti 1 project # __= f condition a. is *Completed and the first l i f t is paved in projects # .. nd #3 of condition a. :3 c. Sewer and water mains within the project shall be constructed by the developer and dedicated to the public, with necessary maintenance easements. Utilities shall be installed under. the terms of a developer's agreement with the City and built to City standards. d. Final utility and drainage plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval. e. All utility lines to be underground. f. The drive to Radatz Avenue through the property to the east shall be constructed with this project. An easement shall be provided to insure its existence after the property is sold. g. The floor elevation of the westerly unit must be approved by the City Engineer. h. The second garage from the west on the south side of the parking lot should be moved to the north side of the parking lot and to the west to improve screening of the homes to the north . i . Any requi red plantings that die shall be replaced. j. All trash to be picked up regularly. Trash shall not be allowed to accumulate on the grounds, except in the designated dumpsters. k. Approval of the preliminary planned unit development is in concept only. this preliminary planned unit development covers the type and number of units and general site only. This preliminary planned unit develop- ment approval does. not cover specific site planning details such as grading, exact building and garage locations, lighting, 1 andscapi ng, screening, building design and maintenance. Final approval may include additional conditions as Council feels necessary. 1. Owner and applicant agree to the above conditions in writing. 1 C 8-16-79:' Council initiated a feasibility study for the Radatz- Southl awn public improvements, required as a pre - condition for the Maple Knoll PUD. i - 11% 9- 21 -79: HUD approved a grant in the amount of $201,400 ($600,000 was applied for) for the off -site public improvements required for. PUD ipproval. On -site land write -down, and site preparation costs were not funded. 4 12. 11- 15 -79: Council denied the applicant's request for tax increment financing. 13. 1 -1 -80: The Metropolitan Council authorized use of previously awarded CDBG Bonus funds in the amount of $72;000 to support the Maple Knoll PUD, making a total of $273,404 in CDBG funds available to the project for off -site improvements. -� J 1 1 -7 -80: a. The Council rejected reconsideration of the applicant request for tax .3 increment financing. b. Council accepted the Radatz- Southlawn feasibility study and ordered a public hearing for 2 -28 -80 15. 2- 28 -80: Council denied the Radatz - Southlawn public improvements. 16. 3 -5 -80: The applicant requested that the Council remove conditions a.l . through a.4. from the previously approved preliminary PUD, ( see 1 -22 -79 of Past Actions) , in response to the Council action of 2- 28 -80. 17. 4- 17 -80: Council denied a request to eliminate conditions A.1! through a.4. Rather, the following modifications to the previously approved preliminary PUD were approved: a. No building permits shall be issued, unless Council orders the following public improvement projects: 1. An adequate sized and designed water main to serve the project, as determined by the Director of Public Works. 2. Upgrading of Radatz Avenue from White Bear Avenue to proposed Southl awn Drive, if.Radatz Avenue is used as an access. 3. Construction of Southlawn Drive from Radatz Avenue to Beam Avenue if it is deemed necessary. 4. Construction of the storm water project shown in the Maplewood Drainage Plan for Radatz Avenue. All necessary easements shall also be dedicated to the City. This project includes piping, pondi ng, and control devices. 18. 5- 29 -80: a. Council authorized Staff to submit an amendment to the CDBG application approved 9- 21 -79. The amendment substituted public improvements along Southl awn Drive for original applied for Radatz Avenue improvements. b. Council also authorized Staff to make application for QBG Bonus funds to off set "above average" on -site development costs - a&$ociated with the Maple Knoll PUD. 19. 7 -3 -80: Council approved construction of Southl awn Drive improvements, contingent upon the availability of previously awarded CDBG funds in the. amount of $273,404. �I 20. 9- 22 -80: HUD approved CDBG Bonus Grant funds in the amount of $182,388 for on -site development costs associated with the PUD. 21. 10- 28 -80: The Community Design Review Board approved the design related aspects of the proposal, subject to the following conditions: a. Approval of design plans do not constitute approval of bui ldi n ermi t. -� 9 P b. Final approval of the PUD from the City Council. - c. The open parking stalls al on the northerl y lot line shall be screened by means of decorative wood fencing, bermi ng, plantings, or a combination of these. d. Trash enclosures shall stand at least six feet in height. These structures shall be solid so they cannot be seen through. The structure shall be protected from reasonable damage b y pipe or s i m i l a r items. e. All utilities, drainage, and access ways are subject to the City Engineer's approval. Any easements as required by the City Engineer shall be provided. f. Site - security lighting shall be provided and shall be designed so not to cause any glare onto adjacent properties. g. All. exterior building equipment, utility meters,, shall be hidden from view or screened. Screening shall be subject to Staff approval. h. There shall be continuous concrete curbing around the parking lot and drive areas. i . The following erosion control measures as suggested by the DNR shall be observed: I. Construct erosion control barriers of straw bales along the limits of grading. The straw bales should be butted end to end and staked securely prior to commencement of grading and left maintained until natural turf is established 2. All exposed soils should be seeded or sodded within one week following completion of activities. If seeded the soil should be mulched with 1500 # /acre of straw at the time of seeding 3. Construct sedimentation traps or sumps in the catch basin to reduce s i l t a t i o n at the outl ets j. The landscaping plan shall be expanded upon and resubmitted for Board review including more trees on the northerly sides of the townhouses and additional foundation plantings around the buildings. The basketball �. court shall also be screened by berming and plantings. := Grass areas along the 'northern lot l i n e shall be studied and proposed to match the existing no lots as far as sodding or seedi n '. 6 k. All required plant materials that die shall be replaced by the applicant. 1. The owner and applicant shall agree to the above conditions in writing. Planning Considerations 1. The proposed site is designated for RLE, Residential Lower ensity Extended use.. Pages 143 -144 of the Land Use Plan states that: _ "This classification for residential use allows for more ccentrated densities of population within defined parts of a given development area while maintaining an average population density of 14 people per net residential acre within the entire area being considered. The maximum density of any segment of the development shall be approved by the City Council, based on the area of natural features to be preserved and the quality of site and building design. This classification is primarily designed to allow for the controlled use of low density apartments and /or townhouse type units, with the application and approval of such development being subject to meeting all of the following conditions: a. Where it is necessary to cluster units in order to preserve valuable natural features, such as woodlots, wetlands, or areas of unusual topography or natural features, and b. Where the overall density of the total development will not exceed 14 people per net acre, and c. Where such development is part of a Planned Unit Development, and d. Provided that such. units are of a scale, design, and location that is compatible with single family homes, located in any adjacent RL area." 2. The proposed density is at the maximum allowed density of 14 people /net acre. If Parcel B is excluded, the density increases to 14.3 persons /net acre. 3. The easterly 4.2 acres of the property which contains 425 feet of frontage on White Bear Avenue, is planned LSC, Limited Service Commercial and will be split from the project site upon approval of the PUD. 4. Section 911.010 (9) of City Code states that: A special use permit may be issued in any use district for a planned unit development A "planned unit development" shall be a development having two (2) or more principal uses or structures on a single parcel of land and may include townhouses, apartment projects involving more than one building, multi -use structures such as an apartment building with retail at ground- --i floor level, and similar projects. s s 7 .Environmental Considerations I. There is significant wetland on the property that is part of the County Ditch 18 system. There is some minor encroachment of wetlands. ( See "edge of swamp" line on the Grading and Utility Plan -not reducible). 2. Significant stands of trees are shown on the Grading and Ut' i ty Plan. Of the 30 large oaks on the site, seven will be removed and tw_ will probably die _V due to damage to their root systems. The applicant will in al 1 snow fences during construction to protect all other mature .trees on the, zi te. Additionally three areas containing aspen and oak whips are designated for protection. � p Public Works 1. The Maplewood Drainage Plan proposes a series of ponds that include a wetland area located partially on the subject property. 2. A preliminary drainage system design has been prepared by Schoel 1 and Madson (See enclosed Map 3 - P,roposed Ponding System Map) This design was based upon design specifications established by Barr Engineering (See enclosed report.) The two proposed ponds are designed as inundation ponds, rather than storage ponds. Water would only pond during heavy storms. The east pond is designed for a high water elevation of 915 feet. The west pond is designed for 906 feet. The elevation of the closest building to each of these ponds would 919 and 911 feet, respectively. A four foot margin is considered to be adequate protection from a 100 year storm. 3. The applicant is proposing to fill in part of the planned floodplai n and excavate from other areas to maintain the same storage capacity. Barr Engineering has stated that the proposed filling would have no significant affect on the designed flood capacity level. Other Agencies 1. The Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed Board approved this project on October 16, 1980. 2. The Corps of Engineers issued a permit for this project on December of 1979. 3. The Soil and Water Conservation Service has reviewed this proposal and recom- mends approval, subject to . eros ion control during construction. They had previously recommended dens al , but changed their opinion after reviewing a current plan. 4. The Department of Housing and Urban Development has approved $273,404 for off-site street, sewer, and water main construction (Southl awn Drive and Drainage Pond system) . In addition, $182,388 has been approved for on -site T public improvements and mortgage related closing costs. r i 5„ The Ramsey County Parks and Open Space Staff _reviewed the proposed site plan and "would not recommend changing the previous decision to delete this parcel from the open space site." (See enclosed letter) . 8 6. The Department of Natural Resources has reviewed the proposal and determined that a Water Resource Permit is not, required Three erosion control measures were, however, recommended for use during construction. Recommendation Approval of the proposed Planned -Unit Development, based upon the following: 1 . - The project would be consistent with the City's Comprehens T P1 an r 2 The units are of a scale, design, and location that would be�compatible with s r adjacent single family homes Final approval is subject to the following conditions: I. The first l i f t of Soutnlawn Drive is paved. 2. Final utility and grading plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval and shall take into consideration the erosion control methods recom- mended by the Soil Conservation Service. 3. Sanitary sewer and water main through the site shall be constructed to City standards. A utility easement shall be dedicated to the public from Southl awn to White Bear Avenue, i ncompassi ng the property between the utility lines and extending 10 feet beyond and parallel to each l i n e . 4. Storm sewer through the project shall be constructed to City standards. Twenty foot storm sewer easements shall be dedicated to the public between buildings A and B and along the .east property line. 5. The elevation of the parking lot in the northwestern portion of the site shall be lowered to allow unimpeded sheet drainage from the properties to the north. 6. The private roadways through the property to the east and west shall be constructed with this project. Design specifications shall be approved by - the City Engineer. Permanent easements shall be provided to insure their continued existence. 7. Occupancy permits shall not be issued until: a. Conditions 1 - 5 are satisfied. b. The first lift is paved for the roadways listed in condition 6. 8. Adherence to the Community Design Review Board's conditions adopted on October 28, 1980. Z . T i s s 9 9. Combine Parcel B (55 feet of frontage on Radatz Avenue) with Parcel A (project site) . EAcl osures : 1. Location Map. 2. Property Line Map 3. Site Plan Map 4. Ramsey County Parks and Open Space Letter 5. Report from Barr Engineering t r i a' �S 10 WHITE BEAR t 7r COUNT Y ROAD 4-) 65; Y U T30NR22% ,54 4j WOODL YN% WiNE 5 0 01 C1 T29NR?2W LYDIA (U—) cc 3 cl) 0. L A N Ir E z 23 w G -7 F F-irl I x_q U) PROPOSED PUQ Lkt-F BROOK AV.E.2 J lir 49 CD SEXTA NT AVE. C � �____] GERVAIC VIKING DR. PEI E 'S TL O SHERREN AVE INVE. �- j AVE COPE o AVE. LARK AVE. w LARK AVE. 4n RD. A UVE r cj to A r cc �ERVAIS U E AV E . =AVE- Ti E LAUR I E RD. RD. A - PRS T z 0 6 3 5 @ �- 8— � C � �j 64 ir .sd cr w i tc A M / � � �� MAP cr C RADATZ cr IF REALTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PETITIONER PLANNED UNIT DE REQUEST JLO-30-80 1( DAT E S CALE CALE LPG. It ow W 0 . it 4a so 7T too lo Pr rs 79 75 -is ISO i0o goo zoo *4 a .& roadwa easement I easement z a. N ^ � - ^ \ REALTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PETITIONER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REQUEST '-' 2. PROPERTY LINE MAP ' PARCEL A 10.69 A ' PARCEL B 2� A . � 'LEWOOD MALL _ AVENUE 1/ 1 i �11 1 ZONING C(m !w •r 1/ �;;o RADATI AVE UE __ R c' I AREA AOUIRED OR TO BE AOUIRED UNDER THE OPEN SPACE PROGRAM PROPOSED FRENCH DRAIN SYSTEM DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY - s i REALTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PETITIONER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REQUEST 3. SITE PLAN c 4 a f RAMSEY COUNTY PARKS& OPEN SPACE DEPARTMENT Ycou 2010 White Bear Avenue Telephone (612) 770.1361 St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 Bernard L. Edmo - s, Director December 4, 1978 - 3 Mr. Geoff Olson, Planner City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Olson: Our staff has reviewed the current plan for Maple Knol 1, by Paul Pink and Associates, dated September 29, 1978. We find that this plan is consistent with the Ramsey County Open Space concept for County Ditch #18. The County's acquisition of this parcel (12) was deleted when the previous plan for the property showed preservation of the entire low area as open space. The current plan is essentially the same as the previous one in that respect. Therefore, the County Parks and Open Space staff would not recommend changing the previous decision to delete this parcel from the open space site. Sincerely, 4 Bernard L. Edmonds Director of Parks and Open Space BLE:ama r i Z L =a 1 BARR ENGINEERING CO. CONSULTING HYDRAULIC ENGINEERS DOUGLAS W. BARR 9900 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH JOHN D. DICKSON MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 33435 L. R. MOLSATMEM TELEPHONE (AREA 9121 920 -0959 ALLAN GESHARD LAWRENCE W. GUBSE LEONARD J. KREMER k DENNIS E. PALMER C WARREN W. MANSON December 171, 1978 Mr. Bill Bittner Director of Public Works and Engineering City of Maplewood 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota Dear Mr. Bittner : We have completed a,preliminary design for the drainage system in the area generally bounded by Beam Avenue on the north, County Road C on the south, the city limits on the east, and County Ditch 18 on the west. Attached is Figure I which shows the limits of the study area. The proposed Maplewood Knoll Townhouse Development is located within this area. This preliminary design consisted of the review of the previous calculations which were computed for the preparation of the Maplewood Drainage Plan, evaluation of any changes in the land use that has occurred since the Drainage Plan was prepared, and detailed field survey to verify the accuracy of the 4 -foot contour interval topographic maps. Immediately upstream of this drainage area is Casey Lake. Casey Lake is located primarily within the city limits of the City of North St. Paul. . It was assumed, as a part of this study, that the maximum discharge from 'Casey Lake will be limited to 15 cubic feet per second which requires a new outlet structure be installed for Casey Lake. This requirement is in accordance with the Hydrologic Analysis of Lakes and Open Space in Ramsey County prepared in 1975. From Casey Lake, it is proposed that the drainage would consist primarily of an open channel flowing almost due west under White Bear Avenue and into the area presently proposed to be developed . into the Maplewood Knoll Townhouse Development: We have carefully analyzed this area based on more detailed field information and have determined that based on the topography, it would be more desirable to have two larger storage basins than the five small basins shown in the Maplewood Drainage Plan. Slightly less storage is required due to the efficiency of having less basins. Also by reducing the number of basins to two, it will require less work in the floodplain and, therefore, less of an environmental impact on the wetland area. T Figure 2 shows the results of the preliminary design for this area.. The eastern storage basin requires 9 acre -feet of storm water storage >` for the 100 -year frequency storm. To obtain the required 9.5E acre -feet of storm water storage water would be stored up to elevatiot. 914.7. Therefore, we recommend that the flood level be established at elevation 915 with a minimum building level of elevation 916 adjacent to this padding site. This would require a restriction dike with a top elevation of 916. A 21- inch corrugated metal pipe should be placed through this dike to allow Mr. Bill Bittner P age 2 December 17, 1978 the smaller storms and low flows to pass through without any appreciable flooding. The western ponding site requires 7 acre -feet of storm water storage volume. To obtain the 7 acre - feet of storm water storage, water will be :stored up to elevation 905.5. We recommend that the flood le_ 1 be set - elevation 906 and that all buildings constructed adjacent - o,this storage site be above elevation 907. To obtain the desired storage, it will require 3 constructing a dike at the approximate location shown on the attached Figure 2. This dike should be constructed with a top elevation of 907. There should be a 24 -inch corrugated metal pipe running through this dike to allow small storms and low flows to pass through without causing any inundation of the floodplain. The storm sewer on Radatz Avenue is the same as shown in the Maplewood Drainage Plan. From Radatz Avenue to the storage site, the required storm sewer size has been reduced from a 33 -inch to a 30 -inch based on more detailed field information. This 30 -inch pipe should extend approximately to the 902 contour line to prevent a serious problem with erosion during peak discharges. The attached Figure 2 shows the land owned by the Maplewood Knoll Development and also the land that is proposed to be included in the Ramsey County Open Space. The land that they have already acquired is shown as shaded. We have analyzed the effect that the proposed Maplewood Knoll Development will have on the floodplain. One of the buildings is shown located sligh into the floodplain and four other buildings are located close enough to the floodplain that the side slope of the fill necessary to construct the building will encroach slightly into the floodplain. Analyzing the effect of this encroachment, we have determined that for the eastern storage basin, the actual level of the 100 -year event would raise slightly less than one - half inch. Considering that the computed floodplain is at elevation 914.7 and the recommended floodplain is proposed at elevation 915, this encroachment is not significant. For the western storage basin the encroachment into the floodplain would amount in approxmately 3/8 -inch rise in the floodplain. This proposed storage site has a computed flood level is at elevation 905.5 and a recommended floodplain at elevation 906, therfore, the 3/8 -inch increase in flood level is not significant. Should you have any questions pertaining to this preliminary design, please contact me. T Yours truly, r �i. s s John D. Dickson J*DD/ am : 1 RA OATi A VE_ r oil tr on 16 $34 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD k • KOHLMAN AVE. 1 f � f�ENGINEERING CO. CON�V►T1M0 t,IgINt�M (. rw..wn �.r.w• " .BARR ENGINEERING CO. ( - OWAILTINC: 11YllUAWLIC• 1 N( ■INI 1 1::1 #001PI.LAf W 11AISIO JO�■N U D/L Kf ON " "It f Of A ■.k / AV 1 N1,.1 %OU 1 ►� L. H MOLIOA1M(M MINftL^P"Ll\ M/h Nl`y0IA ♦ %43,0 A1.L^OV 4L& ►.AMU IONQ IANLA ♦121120 06l2, J LAWIIL W. GUH 01L LLUP4^140 J. ■INLMEN / /[.NNIs L. •ALMLN WANMLN W. MANtiON t Uecelnlber 7 1 978 7 WE 1 1 Realty Development Services, Inc. 7300 France Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 Attn: Mr. Michael P. McKenna Development RepresePtative Re: Maplewood Development Gentlemen: ' We have reviewed your Proposed development in Maplewood p generally located between Roda tz Avenue and hohlman Avenue and between Southlawn Drive and ` White Bear Avenue. As you are aware, we have previously completed a Hydrologic Analysis of Lakes and Open Space in IZ;nnsey County and a Drainage Plan for the City of Maplewood. These studies were completed in 1974 and 1975. Both of these studies were planning studies to provide an orderly handling of flood waters within the geographic boundaries of the study limits. Your proposed development is in :accordance with these planning studies for the handling of surface runoff water. The 100 -year flood levels in ' your area werenot determined as a part of these studies. Therefore, we have cal - culated what the 100 -year flood level is in this area. Under existing condi- tions the proposed building sites are .above the 100 -year flood level. If the restrictions are constructed in the waterway as proposed to create the two inundation areas, your proposed buildings will still be above the revised 100 -year flood level. The proposed filling necessary to create the inundation areas is in Ina .riccordance with the Maplewood brainage Plan and was considered in the deter- mination of the flood level. Any minor filling that may be necessary to complete walkways and open space aclj:lre,lnt tO buildings will not have an adverse effect on the flood storage capacity of the inundation area. . Yours truly, _ s s .. John D. Dickson`' f� J DD /yc PO a • BARR ENGINEERING CO. CONSULTING HYDRAULIC ENGINEERS DOUGLAS W. 8^RR 6600 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH JOHN O. DICKSON MIN NE At•OLtS. MINNESOTA 35615 L R. MOLSATMER TELEPMONE (AREA 612) 920 -0655 ALLAN GEBMARD LAWRENCE W. GUBBE LEONARD J. KREMER DENNIS E. PALMER WARREN W. MANSON _ - January I1, 1979 - W Mr. Geoffrey Olson Director of Community Development City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Re: The Maple Knoll Development in Maplewood Dear Mr. Olson: It has been brought to my attention that the City is concerned about the effect of the above described development on the downstream watershed, in terms of storm water runoff. If the storm water storage basins indicated for the area are not constructed prior to development of this project for the critical 100 -year storm, my computations indicate that the increased volume of runoff would be .2 of an acre -foot, and the peak rate of runoff for the local watershed would be increased by approximately 5 cfs. The effect of this development on downstream storage basins will be negligible. This proposed development will not noticeably affect the peak rate dis- charge downstream of the immediate local watershed. If you have any questions, please contact me at 920 -0655. Sincerely, 1p John D. Dickson �• BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY JDD /rdb cc: Mike McKenna Stan Wendland r i s ..s - i 1C 3. NEW BUSINESS A. Commercial Revenue Note: Highway 61 (Datsun) ...Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesti n-g prel imimary approval for tax exempt mortgage revenue note financing for a Datsun 'al ershi p . V Staff is recommending approval as outlined in their report. _ �- Commissioner Barrett asked what costs would be involved to extend 4 ' water. to the site. Secretary Olson said generally construction costs. Gene Paranteau, representing Mr. Kline, said they w i l l have to extend the water. Commissioner Whitcomb moved that. the Planning* Commission re -c9.pmend 4. to the City Council prel mi nary approval of t he ta exempt mortg revenue note financi na for the Datsun_J))eal ers„��,p a i t is - _consi stmt_ wit the City's Eligibility cri ri SDeci f i cal ly.,� h �nr DQs ] . - 1. Be compatible with the P lanned use and zoning for the site 2. Be a new business that the City wishes to attract. It offers significant new employment opportunities and possesses a low potential for creating pollution 3. Provide a service not now available in the area. Approval is subject to the develo er a in all significant construction Costs t_ o extend water his site_ - -- - Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes - all B. PUD - Maple Knoll Secretary Olson said the applicants are requesting final approval of a PUD for 57 apartment units. Staff is recommending appproval as outlined in their report. Commissioner Howard asked what is proposed for the property on White Bear Avenue. Secretary Olson said he is not aware of any plans, it is proposed for commercial use, although it is not included as part of this project. t Mike McKenna, Realty Development Services, said they are in basic z agreement with staff o'n the recommendation. The owner of the property doe s .- propose commercial use of the property adjacent to Wh - fte Bear Avenue such as a small medical building. 2 11 -3 -80 Commissioner Prew moved the Planninq Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the ro osed Planned Unit Development, based upon the fol 1 owi ng; 1. The project would be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan 2. The units are of a scale, design, and location that would be compatible with adjacent single family homes. i o ions _ Ar- : 1. The first lift of Southlawn Drive is paved. WE 2. Final utility and grading plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval and shall take into consideration the erosion control methods recommended by the Soil Conservation Service. 3. Sanitary sewer and water main through the site shall be constructed to City standards. A Utility easement shall be dedicated to the public from Southlawn to White bear Avenue, incompassing the property between the utility lines and extending 10 feet beyond and parallel to each line. 4. Storm sewer through the project shall be constructed to City standards. Twenty foot storm sewer easements shall be dedicated to the public between buildings A and B and along the east property l.i ne. 5. The elevation of the parking lot in the northwestern portion of the site shall be lowered to allow unimpeded sheet drainage from the properties to the north. 6. The private roadways through the property to the east and west shall be constructed with this project. Design specifications shall be approved by the City Engineer. Permanent easements shall be provided to insure their continued existence. 7. Occupancy permits shall not be issued until: a. Conditions 1 - 5 are satisfied b. The first list is paved for the roadways listed i n condition 6 8. Adherence to the Community Des.i gn Review Board's conditions adopted on October 28, 1980. 9. Combine Parcel B (55 feet of frontage on Radatz Avenue) with Parcel A (project site) . j0. Building permit to be obtained for the first unit within one year of y the P UD approval. i s �s 1.1. Applicant agree to the above conditions in writing. Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - all. C. Joint Meeting with Council Secretary Olson said as a draft of the Comprehensive Plan Update has 3 11 -3 -80 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT W Notice is hereby given that the Maplewood City Council at its meeting of Thursday, November 20 1980 at 8 :00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Maplewood Municipal Building, located at 1380 Frost Avenue will consider and publicly hear the request for a Special Use Perm it for: • APPLICANT: Realty Development Services, Inc. A 5221 Edina Industrial Boulevard Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 PROPOSAL: A Planned Unit Development for 57 apartment units. LOC )VTION: South of Radatz Avenue /West of White Bear Avenue • ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER ARE INVITED TO ATTEND AND BE HEARD t r s �s '�C a M f { e MEMORANDUM Y TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development - SUBJECT: Special Use Permit LOCTION : 1955 Prosperity Road �+ _ APPS I CANT : Northeast Metro Al ano , Inc. OWiR: Cross Lutheran Church PRCPECT: N.E. _Metro Al ano Society Meeting Place DATE: October 8, 1980 Request Approval of a special use permit to use the house as a meeting place for the Maplewood Alcoholics Anonymous Club, Al anon Club, and Al ateen Club. Site Description 1. Lot Si ze : 3.75 acres 2. Existing Land Use: The site is developed with Cross Lutheran Church, school, parsonage, and double bungalow. The double bungalow has' been used by the applicant for meetings for several years, Proposed Land Use 1. See the applicant's letter, 2. The applicant intends to purchase the parsonage from the church and di scontinue use of the double bungalow. The church is considering selling the double bungalow for use as a residence, Surrounding Land Uses 1. Northerly and Easterly: Single -dwel ling homes, 2. Westerly: The church's double - bungalow 3. Southerly: The church and school. Past Actions 8- 25 -76: Council approved a, special. use permit for a drug counseling treatment program at the Gladstone Communi Center (1945 Manton Street) , stsbject to a one ' yea r review by the Council to determine if continued use is warranted. The pro- gram never started, because they were not able to get a lease fro4 the School Di strict, 1 9 -4 -80: Council approved the use of the double bungalow at 1954 Hazelwood for the appl i cant's use. Planning Considerations 1. The Land Use Plan designates this site for church use. 4 2: The Plan for Maplewood states. the following objectives: - a. "The Village l a e should institute a comp rehensive ve health and - ni tati on ram ro • � 9 P program which should include: . . . F. Evaluating the ever -i ncreasi drug problem and suggesting methods of control and correction;" (p.89). b. "The Village should actively support social welfare programs which: e. Encourage the churches, civic and fraternal organi of Maplewood to stimulate, coordinate, strengthen and provide human services in the community" (pp. 89 -90) C. "All educational programs, buildings and facilities within the Village should provide for: c. Utilization as community involvement centers" (p. 93) 3. Zoni ng: F, Fari'i1 Residence 4. Secti on 911.010 of the Ci ty Code permi is communi ty centers or any i nsti tuti on of any educational, philanthropic, or charitable nature in any zoning district by special use permit. 5. There are no specific number of parking spaces required by Code for a community center. b. The applicant estimates that they would need 50 parking spaces during their peak use. 7. Section 911.050 of the Zoning Code states: (1) The City Council, in grant- ing a special use permit, may attach to the permit such conditions and guarantees as may be necessary to the protection of the public, the rights of others and the City. (2) All special use permi which do not have a specific termination date or provision fora periodic review, shall be reviewed within one (1) year of the date of passage and publication of this ordinance and every five (5) years thereafter. The Council may, upon such review, determine that new conditions shall be imposed and that, if reasonable under the circumstances, a termination. date for said special use permit may be established. Public Works Considerations 1. The church, parsonage, and double bungalow are all on the sane water 1 i ne . �;. The water usage for all three buildings i s metered together.. 2. This combined usage of water presents problems for bi if i ng ar maintenance. i� 2 3. When the double bungalow and the parsonage are split off from the church lot, Staff will require that separate water services and meters be provided to each bui 1ding. 4. Each structure has its own sanitary sewer connection. Public Safety Considerations • 1. 7"; structure must comply with Fire and Safety Codes, -� _4 2.fThere should be adequate security lighting i n the parking lot. Social Considerations Valuable community service programs would be made more accessible to residents of Maplewood and the surrounding area. Citizen Comments Staff mailed out questi onai res for the special use permit at 1954 Hazelwood to 28 surrounding property owners. of the 13 who replied, 9 had no objections. Those who did object stated: 1 . " I want to see the property go on the tax r o l l s . I think parkin i s going to 9 9. be a problem and may lead to congestion" 20 "I don't think this is in the best interests of the neighborhood" 30 "Fear it may be sold to some other kind of society other than the Al ano Society" 40 "The answer is "no"! And there are too may objections to report here. We'll wait for the hearing" Analysis The main issue is whether the proposed use is compatible with the neighborhood. The use should not have any adverse impact on the neighborhood and would provide valuable community service programs to residents of Maplewood and surrounding areas. The one -year renewal will give Council the opportunity of reviewing the use after one year to see if any problems have arisen, There is plenty of off - street parking available on the church l ot. However, to assure continued use of the lot, Staff would l i k e a written agreement between the applicant and Cross Lutheran Church, guaranteeing off- street parking. Recommendation I. 'Approval of the special use permit for a non - profit metin n place for the North- 9 P, ..east Metro Al ano .Society, based on the findings that: r Y ii 3 1. There is adequate off - street parking available 2. The use is compatible with the Land Use Plan Approval is subject to: 1. Review by Counci l after one of operation. If -after year no substantial problems have arisen from the. Al ano Club, the ermi t may be F renewed for another five years _4 f2. The applicant shall provide the City with written permission • from the church approving the use of their parking lot 3. Inspection by the Fire Marshal for compliance with Fire and Safety Codes 4. Security lighting to be provided in the parking lot as required by the Director of Public Safety II. Revocation of the special use permit for 1954 Hazelwood, on the basis that the Northeast Metro Alano Society plans to move their meeting place to 1955 . Prosperi ty Road, the revocation shall become effective at the time the applicant roves to 1955 Prosperity Road. • Enclosures tion b7 C o, Ac t i._' 1. Location Map 2. Property Line Map 3. Applicant's letter of explanation _ y L i t r� A A l 7 ___ LMAN AVE W _w ROAD ..C�� Y '_.. 1u) = J W cr -it 0 W w IL „� Z V W W V = W Z cc U) Q DEMONT LL AVE_ ROOK AVE. I a ac 61 W XI AV m L�� GERVAIS AVE. VAI 8 ANDVIEW IL � 36 . V I K I o R. " co^dr; ` 79 Ke /!e r D LARK AVE. 25 J Lake COUN ° RO o °C LELAN < o o JUNCTION AVE v l -- U RKE �44 AN W _ s Q, VE v M V J W o R YAN R. R. l u x e !-' 28 FROST IV 5o r IL 27 �� w FE N AVE. J h c ,62 g < r 0 3 4 dc FRISBIE AVE. ��� 3 lIIPLEY AVE. Q Lake 80 PH IA AvE z = F- h ke Phalen � 3 " o 62 .:;�•.. A P LLNT 30 S H E R R E N A VE, - =-r ' S ER EN AVE. 'E AVE. OPE AVE. t --- -- LARK -AVE. ♦: ~ LARK AVE. to Q y Z LAURIE J L RD. r Z at LAURIE no =•:� < Y Q = 25 SAND =AVE aD of AVE. 8U KE A tl J ! ELDRIOG J AVE pp : J W PUB WORKS R . R i E L MON T oc AVE. W > BLDG. 64 to e =i SKILL MA N m AVE. _ MAR RIS I- sal SOP PRI F1 ST. PAUL 0 nnn� N.E. METRO ALANO SOCIETY PETITIONER . SPECIAL USE PERMIT .REQUEST LOCATION MAP 4 a W KOMLMA1r "A-L a 23 drE HI LL R D. 65 W ►- AV �, 11 to AVE. AV AVC; CA3TLE C C C S H E R R E N A VE, - =-r ' S ER EN AVE. 'E AVE. OPE AVE. t --- -- LARK -AVE. ♦: ~ LARK AVE. to Q y Z LAURIE J L RD. r Z at LAURIE no =•:� < Y Q = 25 SAND =AVE aD of AVE. 8U KE A tl J ! ELDRIOG J AVE pp : J W PUB WORKS R . R i E L MON T oc AVE. W > BLDG. 64 to e =i SKILL MA N m AVE. _ MAR RIS I- sal SOP PRI F1 ST. PAUL 0 nnn� N.E. METRO ALANO SOCIETY PETITIONER . SPECIAL USE PERMIT .REQUEST LOCATION MAP 4 a ---3r—• s 4XI ci - r J of Of A ir 40- W-4 411 U. LJ a. - 7 5 tA cc 4C 00 T 4 14 I W?" -*t _ 1 J y f r, � J 1 ' � � , 4 Q � � C Pot V L-. ddr. AN led Ar Of go iz44 J& A or IQ. dr Llr C3 • Nz. .[ N.E. METRO ALANO SOCIETY PETITIONER ('SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST PROPERTY LINE MAP SPECIAL USE PERMIT 1) That the applicant is a Minnesota non - profit corporation ? th the name of "Northeast iletro Al ano Society" and the corporate ' } or to pure_ se i s to provide physical facilities for the sole use of the Maplewood A. A. Club, Alanon Club and Alateen Club ' and this applicant cant seeks a special use permit so that this applicant can purchase the parsonage located at 1955 Prosperity Avenue, I'lapl ewood , Minnesota, from the Cross Lutheran Church, and this applicant intends to continue the use of the premises as it has so -used the duplex leased from the Church for the p ast four years, which duplex is located at 1954 Hazelwood Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota, and this applicant has written permission or license from the Church to use the parking lot facilities adjacent to the Cross Lutheran Church. That further, this applicant does not intend to change the existing structure or to alter the use of the building as it now exists. That further, this applicant has leased the adjacent duplex owned by the Church and located at 1954 Hazelwood Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota, for the past four years, and this applicant does not intend to engage in any ccmi ercial activity on said premises, and that the use of said pIremises w i l l be as the premises have been used for the past four years. 2) That applicant does not at this time intend to alter the physical structure as it now exists and will use the structure as it now exists. 3) Attached. r 4) Check in the amount of $100 attached. L L. CHARLES PETERSON Attorney for Northeast' "ietro Al ano Society 371 East Seventh Street Saint Paul , Minnesota 55105 (512) 774 -?728 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT Notice is hereby given that the Maplewood City Council atT meeti ng t of Thursday, November 20, 1980 at 8:15 P.M. in the Council hambers* of the Maplewood Municipal Building, located at 1380 Frost Avenue, Maplewood, will consider and publicly hear - the request for a Special Use Permit for: APPLICANT: Northeast Metro Al ano, Inc. 1954 Hazelwood Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 PROPOSAL: Use the house as a meeting place for the Maplewood Alcoholics Anonymous Club, Alanon Club, and Alateen Club LOCATION: 1955 Prosperity Road Notice is also given that the Mapl ewood City Council at its meetin of Thursday, November 20, 1980 at 8:30 P.M. will receive public comnent concerning the revocation of a Special Use Permit which was granted to the Northeast Metro Alano, Inc. for use of the dou.ble bungalow at 1954 Hazelwood for Al anon , Ala teen , and Alcoholics Anonymous ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER ARE INVITED TO ATTEND AND BE HEARD -r I A. Special Use Permit - 1955 Prosperity t (Alano) r P Y � © (� /D � Secretary Olson said this is a re quest for a special al q p use permit to use the house at 1955 Prosperi ty as a meeting place for the Maplewood Al ' m P cholol�cs Anan y ous Club, Al anon Club, and . Al ateen Cl ub, Staff is recommending approval of the request as outlined in their report. Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone present who wi h ed to c . .� omen t on the proposal. . Charles Peterson a member f �� � � o the Board for the Northea ".Metro 4 : Alano, said he would be glad to answer questions . agree w� He does with T the Staff report. Commi ssioner Howard moved the Planning reconmend to the Council approval of the special use permit or a non-profit meeti n p lace or tne for ` eas a ro ano o based on the fol 1 owi n fi ndi n a: 1. There is adequate off - street parking available 2. The use is compatible with the Land Use Plan Approval is subject to 1. Review by Council after one year of operation. on. f Y P I after one year no substantial problems have arisen from the Al ano Club, the permit may be renewed for another five years 2. The app shall provide the City with written permission from the church approving the use of their parking lot 3. Inspection by the Fire Marshal for compliance with Fire and Safety Codes 4. Security Lighting to be provided in the parking lot as required by the Director of Public Safety. .• Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - all . B. Special Use Permit Revocation: 1954 Hazelwood Commissioner Howard noved the P 1 a nn i nq Commission mm reco end o t d C Counc revocat of the use p erm i t for 1954 Hazelwood on the basis that the _Northeast Metro A_7 ano So ci e t" 1 an to moy nne _9 .pla to 1955 ♦ Pr os eri ty , Road,_ the revoca LQU 1 b�,cm, e effe �cti neat th_e ____ t ime the a 1 i cant mov to •1955 Prosperi tv Road. �- Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes - all Y f M E M O P A N D U M TO: - ** City Manager FRO_ �r - Director of Community Development SUB � T: Rezoning LOC&ION: 763 N. Century Avenue APPLICANT: City Council OWNER: Warren V. Burton DATE: October 10, 1980 .1i G+. Iv v +m.sa�..u.,.+..+ae.:�.. �....r.- ..+.sam:.�.•... -r.. Reque Counci 1 i ni ti ated a rez oni ng f rom R -1 to LBC, 1 i mi ted bus i nes s commerci al . Considerations 1. Refer to the staff report of September 10, 1980 for background information. 2. Council denied the original request for a BC, business commercial zone. The attorney ruled that a new hearing was needed to rezone the site to LBC. Recommendati on Approval of the rezoning from R -1 to LBC, Limited Business Commercial on the basis that: c 1. The rezoning is in compl iance with the Land Use Plan. 2. The rezoning would be a continuation of the adjacent commercial property to the south. 3. The applicant has submitted a petition signed by over 51 %. of the adjacent land owners agreeing to the proposed commercial zoning. 4. The LBC zoning would provide a safeguard for the adjacent residential development to prevent the construction of an objectionable commercial business. Enclosed: Staff report of 9 -10 -80 y y i v .i: • MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Zone Change - LOCAION : 763 N. Century Avenue APPLI.�ANT /OWNER: Warren V. Burton DATEM September 10, 1980 Request Approval to rezone property frpm R-1, Single Fami Residence to BC, Business Commercial ` Site Description 1. Lot Size: 13 946 square feet 2. Existing Land Use: Undeveloped Proposed Land Use Refer to the applicant's letter Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single family homes Southerly: A & W Restaurant Westerly: Single family homes Easterly: Century Avenue . Across Century is commercial property in Oakdale Planning Considerations 1. Land Use Plan Designation: SC, Service Commercial. 2. This commercial land use classification rel to those commercial activities that can best provide complementary commercial service to the community by rat being located in major commercial centers. However, the land use plan suggests that these type commercial activities be considered 'i n the planning context of small commercial centers as well Commercial acti v "ti es which encompassed within service commercial centers include: �- f 1 t k , a. Nei ghborhood and communi ty commerci al shoppi ng faci 1 i ti es ; b . vehicle drive-in commercial services; c. Wholesale commercial activities; d. -Speci al i zed retail activities such as drugstores,beauty salons_,: Laundro- mats , small variety stores, and barber shops, 3. Zoning: R -1, Single. Family Residence Publ i c Works Considerations Sanitary sewer and water are available. Analyses Staff is hesitant to recommend the rezoning of this property to a wide open zoning designation such as BC. The problem is that there are virtually no restricted uses within this' zoning cl ass i f i cati on. The consequence could be the development of a business on this lot, which meet BC district requirements, but may be objectionable to the abutting residential neighbors. A recent example of this was the construction of a Big A Auto Parts on Century Avenue. Big A was a permitted use in a BC zone, however, it was erected much to the displeasure of the adjacent residents who felt that it was very incompatible with their neighborhood. On August 2, 1979 the City Council denied a rezoning request at the northwest corner of Radatz Avenue and white Bear Avenue from F, Farm Residence to BC (M). Denial was based on there not being a specific development plan for the property. Staff feels that the subject parcel should be rezoned to a commercial classification, however, it should be changed to a more restrictive zoning. A LBC, Limited Business Commercial zoning classification would protect the adjacent residential neighbors from a possibly objectionable neighborhood business. This zoning classification would allow professional office buildings. If in the future there is a specific use proposed for this lot, Staff feels that the City may then consider rezoning to BC. Recommendation Approval to rezone the subject property to LBC, Limited Business Commercial on the basis that: 1. The rezoning is in compliance with the Land Use Plan. 2. The rezoning would be a 'continuation of the adjacent commercial property to the= _soutn' 3. The.appl i cant has submitted a petition signed by over 51% of the adjacent 1 an4 owners agreeing to the proposed comerc i al zoning. • Y • 2 s t. • 4. The LBC zoning would provide a safeguard for the adjacent residential develop- ment to prevent the construction of a possibly objectionable commercial business. The City w i l l consider rezoning the -property to BC in the future, p ovi di ng there is. a specific development proposal for the s i t e , ' Enclosed: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line Map 3. Applicant's letter • , r t 't r �f �r • 1 7- 1-40 W ARYLAKE R E) LIJ Cr < w U -Y Troiler Court (Pr -IV a I e) � 2I2 E MARYLAND AVE. �� ' =� t Cr 6 L Beover %44GNOLIA AVE. 0 -z�-- Loke oil I t vi z Cr Ui PL C5 un CLI oil -HARVr -R CASE gn z I ESTE tL 7�1 AVE. AVE F C) L tr w � �[` EL L= 3 U2 ] r 2121 t�`- = BR AND A V E. ERA N 22� ST. I E. 7TH 5 T. E 7 TM ST Q ��Q j P J + f T291% Ir BUSH 2530 C;; R22W 21W m l AVE. Q a ` _S ,� W �70> W >- E M. I N N E H A H A A 34 34 UP E. MARGARET ST.-" ii (r ` E. 5TM ST t4f) �! -- z � 1 J 0 1 4 JMO NT AVE ,x FRE AVE 3 M, IX JLJ Ir Ui ?V'CE PD. 3 M an 7 41 PETITIONER Warren V. Burton REQUEST Rezoni 1. Location Map_ 4 _T < S E V E-7 NTH- si. • `� _7 f I U-2. • - -4- ........................... Z IF li � - ' lb OP V_ do t PETITIONER Warren V. Burton R Rezonin -2. Propert Line Map 1 r � 1 r f r clt� 'C�r wT, r i .,.- -� L � � �*— ..mac--- _.....,t� -_ C�--•' rte-•; " J (�.� — r�� ✓rte I Cam, Y�r✓r � C �.� ep fl TItoj ' ZI , 1 • 9 � f r i E . Zone Change - 763 N. Century (Burton) Associate Planner Johnson said the applicant is requesting a rezoning from R -1, Single Family Residence to BC, Business Commercial. Staff is recommending rezoning to LBC, Limited Business Commercial as outlined in their report. Mrs. Burton, said she has all of the signatures of the property owners on Mayhi l l Road except one. She wished the property would be rezoned to Business Commercial. Chairman Axdahl asked if there w_ as anyone else present . who wished to comment on the proposal. Commissioner Whitcomb moved that the Planning Commission recommend to the Cot t Counci 1 a_p�p to rezone the subject proper y _to L BC Limited Business Commercial on the basis that: 1. The rezoning . i s in compliance with the Land Use Plan 2. The rezoning would be a continuation of the adjacent commercial property to the south 3. The applicant has submitted a petition signed by over 51% of the adjacent land owners agreeing to the proposed commercial zoning. 4. The LBC zoning would provide a safeguard for the adjacent residential development to prevent the construction of a possibly objectionable corrmerci al business.. 5. The City may consider rezoning the property to BC in the future, providing there i s a specific development proposal for the site. r Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - all,, . i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING PETITION FOR CHANGE*IN ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION . Notice is hereby given that the Maplewood City Council will conduct a public hearing on Thursday, November 6, 1980 at 8:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Maplewood Municipal Building located at 1380 Frost Avenue. The purpose of said hearing shall be for the City Council to publicly hear and consider all remarks regarding a petitioned change in zoning district classification filed by: APPLICANT: City Council 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 REQUESTING ZONING CLASSIFICATION: LBC, Limited Business Commercial EXISTING ZONING CLASSIFICATION: R -1, Single Family Residence PROPOSED REZONE SITE: 763 N. Century Avenue ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER ARE INVITED TO ATTEND AND BE HEARD • M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Public Works Ac �_ion ba SUBJECT: Rezoning LOCATION: North of Rosel awn , west of Sloan Place 7 APPLICANT: McDonald's Corp. 1: OWNER Douglas DeCoster PROJECT: McDonald's Restaurant DATE: - September 26, 1980 Req uest The Applicant is requesting approval of a rezoning from CO- Commercial Office to BC - Business Commercial to build a restaurant. Site Description 1 . Location: See enclosed maps 2. Lot Size: 1.4 acres with 198 feet of frontage on Sloan Place 3. Existing Land Use: Undeveloped Proposal 1. Development of a McDonald's Restaurant 2. Refer to Applicant's letter of August 29, 1980 Surrounding Land Uses North: National Cash Register Corporation East: Sloan Place. Across Sloan Olace, single family dwellings' wel l i ngs' zoned F -Farm and planned LSC and the proposed si of the St. Paul Board of Realtor's office building, zoned LBC - Limited Business Commercial and planned SC - Service Commercial "South: Mr. Steak West: I -35E P1 anni ng 1. Lund Use Plan Designation: LSC - Limited Service Commercial 2. Zoning: CO - Commerci Office 3. Criteria from the Plan: Page 132 - Limited Service Center classification recognizes that a wide range of commerci al i zed service activities exi and are desired which should be , l."mi ted - as to location function, mix and Quantity. Further, such centers s� ould be planned and ;developed under performance s tandard techniques which are d.es i gned to more cl osely i ntegrate such commercial activities into the land use pattern i n such a - manner that concern is given to the overa` 1 environment impact of such activities to surrounding and adjacent land use Page 132 - Limited Service Centers include office parks, interchange commercial activities, automobile drive-in uses and neighborhood f a c i l i t i e s . Page 132 " The City sh.ouid approve locations only after complete environmental planning which includes cons i deri rg function, traffic, intensity of acti architecture,, amenities, surround uses, and utilities 4: Ordinance Considerations: Z t i a�. Section 915.030 of C Code states that . the governing body, An cons iderl ng an exception or change to the zoning ordinance, shall , among other things "l. Assure itself that the proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance h' 2 . Determine that the. proposed change w i l l not substantial change, injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded • 3 . Determine that the proposed change w i l l serve the best interests of the V i l l a g e , the convenience of the community (where applicable) , and the public welfare" b. Section 102d of the Commercial Office Zoning Code prohibits "drive-in or any restaurant use commonly referred to as "fast food" or "franchise" wherein the emphasis is on automobile oriented clientele and/or where any sizeable portion of the total activity is involved in take. -out orders intended for consumption other than within the building." Hence, the parcel must be rezoned to BC - Business Commercial to develop the site as a McDonald's Restaurant. Public Works 1. The existing sewer capacity for this area is presently overloaded. (See Sewer Capacity Map) 2. Th City Sewer Plan Update (.September 1980) recognizes this capacity deficiency as the most critical sewer related problem in the City. The plan proposes immediate attention (_pages 27 -29) . 3. The Director of Public Works will be bringing a project proposal for this area before the. City Council this winter. Citizen Comments Staff survey6d the owners of the properties located within a 350 foot radius of the subject site. Of eleven potential respondents, Staff received input from four. tr None of the four objected to this aropos al . Two respondents had the following .comments: - "Storm water. runaway should be taken care of by McDonald's a� - was also proposed for the Realty Company to be built on Sloan" "My lack of objection is only that I consider McDonald's 1 es objectionable than a bar or lounge, or garage or gas station" 2 Analys i s The issues before the City are: 1. Does the proposed rezoning meet the intent of the Land Use R'an? 2._ Wi l 1 approval of the rezoning compound the ex'i sti ng - sewer caoci ty problem? Designed for Limited Service Commercial use, the site is intended for automobi l-e dri ve =� in uses and-highway interchange commercial activities among others. In this case, it appears as if Business Commercial Zoning would be more consistent with the Land Use Plan's intent for the site. The present zoning - Commercial Office - is intended primarily for professional and administrative offices, and for low intensity commercial uses adjacent to residential districts. The buffering intent of the present Commercial Office Zoning is not a necessity for this site. 4 The subject parcel is surrounded by parcels planned and in most cases p resently zoned for uses which are intended to act as buffer uses, As such, this proposal should not detract from the use of nearby properties zoned for residential use. The only concern Staff has regard.i ng this proposal, is the. issue of deficient sewer capacity in this area. The Land Use Plan calls for additional medium density residential and commercial development within the vicinity of the subject proposal. - To accommodate the planned for development the sewer system will have to be upgraded. The question becomes how much more development can the already overloaded system absorb before serious consequences arise. In the opinion of the Public Works Director, additional waste loadings from a McDonal d's and the proposed St. Paul Board of Reators Office will have an insignificant effect relative to the overall problem. If, however, development is allowed to continue without correcting this capaci deficiency, sewer back -ups and possible system failure are inevitable, Recommendation I Approval of the requested rezoning from CO - Commercial Office to BC - Business Commercial for the north portion of Lot 4. Block 2, Maplewood Office. Approval is based upon the following findings: 1. The rezoning is consistent with the spirit and intent of the Land Use Plan 2. The proposed rezoning will not injure or detract from the use of the neighboring properties 3. = The proposed de.,vel opment will not, by itself, significantly add to the existing sewer deficiency. Ho Council should initiate a f e a s i b i l i t y study for correcting the s6swer capacity deficiency ion this area. Enclosures: 1. Location , Map 2. Property Line Map 3. Applicant's letter of August 29, 1980 4. Sewer Capacity Map 5. Petition I �C1 N ^ 58 I " 1 ' 1'� LARK AV*E•'�; rw VI KIN .' � LITTLE CANADA `� 35 �aR R0 -� � E � � a � v N 1 BURKE AV. a 4 sn ELDRIDGE IDGE Ali Son dy -. BELMONT LA. A ELMO B MT Lode SKI ]ALo VE. �sKILLWAN Kt MAN AV ; ILI MT z _ 0 . O VERNON AVE < 0 < r � MT. VERNON AVE- W z ENO D0 NS AVE. w �0 J W " 1 _ W L °C > 2 AOSELAWN d AVE. 3 26 O t j i 3 BE 00 AV. L OOD AVE. BELLY cr �+ ° y l vs SUMMER AVE.t Z FEN TON AVE 4 II Z C 1 11 �• y h �.11.� h- a 4rS T W } !p Y AV E Z 10 •- t N �" 0 �- } KlNGS2 t Q► _ KING AYE. W �'� N * 4 (n Zi t W ICE AVE. W PR O 30 .. 30 49 11TI 57 ST. PAUL MC DONALD'S CORPORATION PETITIONER ZONE CHANGE REQUEST 4 LOCATION MAP a 1 1 y i ; • PARKS I DE I F.E LSATLO N f NCR CORPORATION r oll D EL LING • 4 DWELL u DEL G_ r `MR.. iSTEAK F TU REII OF FICE, 1 1 S . I P 4U B -OAR D ur 'E TORS Ar /J r / Ld f / Lo 1 t ch 1 1 i E MC DONALD'S CORPORATION TIONER . ZONE CHANGE REQUEST � PROPERTY LINE MAP Q a 1 s. 1 i E MC DONALD'S CORPORATION TIONER . ZONE CHANGE REQUEST � PROPERTY LINE MAP Q a PHONE (612) 224 -5379 DECOSTER CO. REALTORS 203 ENDICOTT BUILDING ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 A 2 Industrial and Commercial Real Estate Au g 29, 1980 _ -- T M3, Ge of f rey Olson Director of Development City of Maplewood 1902 East County Road "B" Maplewood., Minnesota 5 5109 Dear Mr. Olson: Please find enclosed our application, filing fee, certified abstracts, petition and plats on property proposed f or rezoning in Lot h, Block 2, Maplewood Off ice Center. We are writing this note to further comply with your f i ling requirements f or our petition to rezone the subject property from CO - Commercial Off ice classif ication to BC - Business Commercial classification to allow the development of a free standing McDonald' s restaurant. We understand that BC classification is required for this use. The sub jest property is designated LSC -- Limited Service Commercial Center on your land use plan. This classification provides for controlled commercial development of such diverse activities as; (1) highway interchange commercial locations (2) off ice and industrial parks and (3) commercial areas adjacent to major centers. The area to the East of subject premises across Sloan Street, and North of Roselawn (including the three houses) is proposed for SC Service Commercial class if ication which provides for smaller convenience type commercial uses. We understand that Office uses such as the St. Paul Board of Realtors use of the corner lot are included uses in this classification, At the time of rezoning the lot to IBC classification for the Real Estate Board, the LBC use was to serve as a buffer between the residential areas East of McMenomy and the more intense and active commercial uses, such as the Mr. Steak restaurant, adjacent to Highway 35E. It is highly likel3- that under the SC land use, the three houses North of the proposed Real Estate Office will eventually be converted to LBC, uses to provide similar 'puffers, and at the same time provide relatively good value for the properties. The present owners have been trying to sell this property for about 15 years and inquiry for office use during this period has been extremely limited. The NCR building was constructed in 197Q, and the next off ice interest which was able to be f irmed up was the Board of Realtors ten years later. Mr. Geoffrey Olson - 2 - August 29, 1980 = As noted in the Metropolitan Council publication on Office Sp &ce Trends published in April 1980 and covering the 1970 - 1980 - period, there has been only negligible office development in the Northeast quadrant of the St. Paul suburbs, with the only noted concentrations being straight East along 1 -94 (3Y1 and Western Life) and North in Roseville around Rosedale and in Shoreview - Arden Hills in the I -691 - Highway 51 area. The several small speculative office buildings built in the 1970's along I -35 and S.T.H. 36 have taken considerable time to lease up. On the other hand, there is a restaurant demand as shown r by the Mr. Steak installation, and the proposed McDonald's restaurant. The McDonald research department predicts a successful restaurant here and both McDonald's and Mr. Steak believe the two restaurants will compliment each other (as shown by the Mr. Steak signature on the petition). In summary, we believe the proposed McDonald's use of the premises fits the . guidelines of your Land Use Plan and will provide a use for the property and a tax return to the community that we have been trying to find these several years. We thank both you and the Council for your consideration of this petition. Very truly yours, j 116" / + 1 Dough: M. DeCoster DMD : j td Enclosures �i - v s • �+ (• sue_ - -�- - -, - _ ... :. l _ 1 �. '' _ `� C - • � ` _ �/ cm �• - • �� `,`��! � \ - •'� l • ��, �___ ��• � ` ti .. 3 •,�_ ..• - ! is �• y •r ��� �`J / � ^ ��es / '" 1 alloo, - ..• - _ � /'mot • .•- . - i L ` � ■ � � � � ■.• �s IL r .• k; f I n r ,'• / • ••• ~ •1• ,`\ t r •S '� i ' / ••A ,�i� _ '___ \ �� • ■a \ �• _ •� M •. /!!- r j, IL _ --. • . o. / �.t•r sue. ��_ 1 J^. . ...... .• -- •�.., � Kent + ►.� ;� �- ! / VE k^ . A : t w F.O�ttrtur. 1• • '^ •,.. P • { . .`/ / ' ' " Apos Will.; IMP , T 1 -ol Ile- ' \•• �i E , •_ii� � / '• _.•- •.-.r;.' . • � • LO,a CTLO J. - - - ... _•_ ,\ R• — ` i , � r — f \� ` •� �• �'SUMME j " J. _ e.. • • ■/ C f'�_ w. • J 11 I * �� -I� • _ 3 • •I �►► /" j[v•';: � A te . . � 1 ' • � r , � �"'� �'� � i ' _ J ... � • ••. -' � • F ?' _- �-., /*j,r2 F' T'1 T �' t !� ' •^ '' i � ' • ( � 1 ' • • � / Q' � -:` • `, � jl -�. •.. ' .: -� y 1. • StatiO� ( 1� /{ _ •. `•"7� _rl • . : /-yam ^.. �: au • - r •• .J t � • \ � SIR 4F � T• `. 7 � •a ,.. •• • : • .. .+ _ _ � • j - _ ---'• { ' I ` t, •r - .f n -` ^' 7 E t w • ` • - ��;` - Lv- ♦ XrR.�f i� 1► 3T♦� "�� ��� "(AIL '�►�/*L'1 I-i te I ' - - _ j ai __ _ w i i � - • • .:.. min z - - ' : 1 . • ,s a • • 1: L • ti . _ _ { L _ _4 AL 1000b. or A - = j � C ..} - - ,^•, _,�• .._ • � • I • - _ a L J. - :9.�..^ � _. ins,. _. ; - - :. _ _ — -- ' _� ..... .. . •�� �.-- .i - � • .. �.► , i •_ter - -- _ — A of _ _ — — •_ - ii iJn.:` L'r- 3 r i f.;i; 41 s/ ) l: :s)•:' i �•« �t ' �_ �-' .L_.Lti!_ s••.�. _ .._ ■ 1r a TROU BROOK INTERCEPTOR EXISTING FUTURE • INTERCEPTORS ..... ■�■■•�• -. TRUNK SEWERS • -- METERING POINTS • - LIFT STATIONS ■ ■ x CAPACITY DEFICIENCIES 'AREAS TRIBUTARY TO ADJACENT -_ COMMUNITY SYSTEM EMEME11 FIT PETITIONER ' .McDo ' n id s a . Sewer Capacity R EQUES T -.Rezoning E , R T"T) I 1!l 0 t:N ArJOTIN 1 1 1440 PMTION it) We, the-. ur.der-signed'. propert owners- collectively represent 50Z- or more of the er LtT owners within 200 f eet of the re rezone propert:3 described ad prop on tbe attache& a pplicatiom- in- accordance. w:Ltk Secti __ of� •'Maplewoo& Municipal Code.. the nx for a claarcre- in. offiz r 0 U C-laesifi--* tio We- peUtion the Mlaplewoo& Gi tY C o i i nc-4 1 proper from zonin tc�Business?.Cor grci o=-- .-- j attacbe& described proper zonin Our- itames: carr- be verified., as le constd-tute& '.,.'.a n& ow era o= the certIfied.-ah tin ovaers of T-an& w-Ithirr 350 feet: of,' the re rezone-- area) wii1dix xs� re to b(!.b- f1led irL coaJunc-tIon-'r-ritir the rezone -app a n-. ancl this petltlan._ wri or. a n ers='& name on this,- pe" tints is in 1 cati on. eE. th=-. The **Cten.- SlLenature P ' xrse als erZo —_ -7A-':-- J-, ti persons, un rran arl the propose& 'zone-, the proposec I loca m and air •�_ e.: - _•�:: == -. =_.... - _�♦- : _ _� .- - -_ . - -. w -_ -.: .•._ - � _, -- - - . .`^ �- ��-��-��� ����, -��- meat for. -apprqva�L- df suclr'. c zf itn -,'� #_ •- _� � ��/� A ♦ i .- ,�.- y � •�� _- •►.���`i��•��• w � .•:r�� -�: :07 Paxkside7 Volunteer F ix�e D e pt V r - �.' _ - C ix D CO e Co ste r-- mpa Arffiim W e� Ha Cons Cti mn ' 000 , X TN7vjrr emterar- Pen sim- unct Zaecor, rn a. M a r tirr and Elizabeth S•.. Cap ede= w G B`� MMMN� one^ an wow d. Mar TO.- . T Murph n 7N PA C=st=ce If.. Fleming- 8 ........... isE ° o 4 OWN ( PETITION We, the u Q p roperty wn•dersi ned oers collectively represent 50% or more of the _ ad ' oining roper - V owner. s ��ithi.n 200 f net of the requested reLOn rropert1� described P i ti c, atrached a� p li cation in accordance with Section 915.010 Q the Maplewood o� r 'rlunicipa l Code* ' R let ° sa food City Council foi a ci:ana e in, officia1 zoning CIassi�i�� tic we petition the p 6�'attacbed descri��ed r0 ert fro 0r': ring t: Business� property y zonin. r 1 be verified, as legal constituted ].and owners, on the certified abs Lract Ou � 1 .�a can , g . (li.stinry ovn`rs of land —ithi•n 350 tent of the requested rezone area) which is requ.irec to be filed in conjunction vith the rezone • application and this petition. The written S.Lqnatute of any person's name on this petition is indication o thaw person's unders Landing of the proposed zone, the proposed location and an endorse – went for approval. df such ch`nge. ABSTRACT CERT. SIG11TAUt7�tL PRINT NAME LIST NO • AkIr n - P a r kside Volu Fire Dept. I OI . / f - 1 V DeCoster Company and Arthur W. Hage Construction Co. Twin City Carpenters Pension _ 3 Fund c4ff 4ice/\ • j ge 5 e - r f✓ s IiA Y / 4 Zaeco, Inc. 5 Martin and Elizabeth S. Capeder 6 +. I Gar B. and Mar T. MuKRhr:_,_ 7 - • Constance H. Fleming 8 e- 3'Of R ?1%1' 0NV- I's E'l` I';: 1. 0 � . PETITION t`Te, the u:�:1e: signed property owners collectively represent 50% or more of the adjoining pl.. ope i -y owner. s ta 200 f eet of the requested rezone rr-operty described on the at ; ached al pl_I cation in accordance with Section 915.010 of t he N, Iapl;�wood Mlunic ipa?_ Code. We petition the MC-1p1 ewocd City C'ounci. for a Change in official zoni_l� cles•si� .cat1 r. �M C �aL awl . on t��e =attached u�scri��ed , r�� ert fra:: onin , t: Com e . �ia�. �' P Y - - _- — - - - -- zonine . Our ,lames can be verified, as legal constituted land owners, on the cer_ ti..f eta abstract Clisting oin - i:irs of land wi th in 350 feet of the A equested rezone ax ea) wlT ich is required to be filed in conjunction ;,Tith the rezone -application and this petition. The wriL.tzn of a ny person's nav on. this petition is indication cf that person s deers tai - ?din-? of the proposed zone, the proposed location and an end or se-- m�nt for a;:prov al of such change. S I GNP', .L < L% , PRINT NAME Parkside Volunteer F i r e Dept. oe � / DeCoster Com an and �--, Arthur W. Hage Construction Co. v � i Twin City Carpenters Pension Fund Z aec o, Inc. Martin and Elizabeth S. Ca p ede r Gary B Mary ._, Murphy `_ r Constance H. Fl eming ABSTRACT CERT . LIST N0. 3 4 �. 5 6 7 ,} j F 8 t`,U TOI'N1hG PRO11DE '.4. 0VTIN EL RUELCN E PETITION • ( PETITION Y` I.Te, the undersigned property owners collectively represent 50% or more of the ad j ooning proper owners within 200 feet of the requested rezone property described on the attached application .in - accordance with Section 915.010 of tie Mapl: -wood i�Ln is ipa Code . .- _ : • - - i We pet .t .on the :SapiE��ood ': city Cou ncil for' a c hancre , in official zy o nz n s classy f ication on the a -ttached described property fro .A. Z6mmere -Of I c e zoning t -, B41. s - _ merr.i al zoniro • - Our Names can be verified, as legal constituted land owners, on the certified abstr2ct (listiner o - uners of land Y�ithin 350 feet of the requested rezone sr ea) t: hi.cn is rec;uir e to be f iled in conjunct with the rezone -application and `his petition. The writ-ten s i g: a tur e of any person s name on this petition is indication of t1Aca t- V erson' s urz ie-t s tan. ding -cz the proposed zone, the proposed location and an endorse- - r,� nt for aiproval df such change.' ABSTRACT C E -L . SIGH" IL FKiNT NAME t .John N. Cardoz o � Ted N. Cardozo - Steven C. DeC oster Dou M. DeCoster. . - t . s NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING PETITION FOR CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION' Notice is hereby given that the Maplewood City Council will conduct a public hearing on Thursday, October 16, 1980 at 7:45 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Maplewood Municipal Building located at 1380 Frost Avenue. The purpose of said hearing shall be for the City Council to hear and consider all remarks regarding a petitioned change in zoning district classification filed by: APPLICANT: McDonal d's Corporation 8030 Ni collet Avenue Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 REQUESTED ZONING CLASSIFICATION: BC, Business Commercial EXISTING ZONING CLASSIFICATION: CO, Commercial Office PROPOSED REZONE SITE: A vacant 1.4 . acre parcel of land located north of 305 East Roselawn ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER ARE INVITED TO ATTEND AND BE HEARD CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA C. Rezoning -Sloan Place (McDonald's) Secretary. Olson said the applicant is requesting approval of a zone change from CO, Commercial Office to BC, Business Commercial to build a restaurant. Staff is recommending approval as outlined in their report. Mike Asaad, McDonal ds said he would be glad to answer q.vesti ons . He did have a meeting with the neighbors. They were concerned with traffic, litter, etc. The building will be about 4,000 square feet. He presented traffic figures for the Commi ssi on ` s information. Commissioner Prew asked what the hours of operation would be. Mr. Asaad said 7:00 to 11:00 weekdays, Saturday is 7:00 to 12:00 Commissioner Barrett asked if the sewer probler� would have to be corrected before construction. Secretary Olson s a i d 4 the consultant has indicated there is a problem, the purpose of the f e a s i b i l i t y would be to arrive at some costs and a solution to the problem. Commissioner Barrett said he thought the sewer problem should be corrected either before or during construction of the restaurant. Commi ssi oner Ki shel said he thought the Commission should just make a recommendation to the Council to initiate a feas i bi 1 i ty study. Commissioner Ki shel moved the Planning Commission recommend to t_ h_ e . City Council - the request of McDonald `s Corpor to rezone the p rp _ pert y i q uestion from CO, Commercial Office to BC, Busine Commercial be approved based on the following: 1. The rezoning is consistent with the spirit and intent of the Land Use Plan, 2. The proposed rezoning wi ll not injure or detract from the use of the neighboring properties 3. The proposed development will not, by itself, significantly add to the existing sewer deficiency. Comm i ss i oner Sl etten seconded. ir Commissioner Kishel said he making a motion on just the zone .change at this time. A separate motion will be required for the initiation of a f e a s i b i l i t y study for the sewer. t Voting: byes - 6: Nays - a( Commi ssi oners Barrett and Fischer) Commissioner Fischer roved the P1 aRni ng Commission recommend the City Counci 1 initiate a feas i b 1 i t y s tudy for correc th sew er c apacity e i ci ency i n this area. � r - Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes - al 1. November 13, 1980 STAFF REPORT To: City Manager Barry Evans From: Director of Public Safety Richard W. Schaller Subject: Paramedic Vehicles Proposal It is proposed that the City Council authorize the purchase of two 1981 model xi Chevrolet station wagons for paramedic patrol use from Merit Chevrolet. Background In accordance with our advertisement, the following bids were .received on November 12, 1980, for the purchase of two 1981 station wagons to be used for paramedic patrol work: Merit Chevrolet Co. $8,960.44 Buerkle Buick Co. No Bid Malkerson Motors, Inc. No Bid No other open bids were available for station wagons meeting our specifications* In reviewing our program's needs, especially in view of the rising cost of carryall -type vehicles, it was felt that a station wagon. -type vehicle would adequately support our objectives. This decision was reached with input and support from the fire service, who will assume a slight increase in their demand for transportation services. Adequate funds have been allocated within this budget to cover all costs. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council authorize the purchase of two 1981 Chevrolet station wagons from Merit Chevrolet to be used for police paramedic patrol service. , W RWS:js cc Finance Director Budget File Lieutenant Cusick Act on b� ii. `/ / �./ V VLxww..+� +yc+r+a�.�r.aw�wM�:: a�.•t D rate - �w. wonsra�r .a.r.ar.rwrar.rwww"�wee.�.aw. G-2a November 17, 1980 AMENDED STAFF REPORT To: Cit Mana Barr Evans From: Director of Public Safet R. W.. Schaller Subject: Police Vehicles - Amendment to Bid Price and Bud Transfer Throu a subtraction error on our part and an ad in price b the Ford Motor Compan for stripin our vehicles, the purchase order sent t.o Rid Ford was incorrect. The correct char are as follows: Base Hennepin Count Bid $83,233.00 Less Power Windows (Not In Our Specs) 150.04 $8 Plus Our Blue Stripe & Paint 125-00 $8,207-96 The actual cost per vehicle will, be $8,207-96, or $49,247.76, for all six vehicles. The Staff Report of November 13, 1980, should be modified at toni shirt sleeve Council session to reflect the above fi alon with the actual .mount of the bud transfer re in the recommendation from the Fuel and Oil account should be corrected to $4,888. Rid Ford has re a corrected purchase order be sent to them. RATS : i s cc Finance Director Bud File Vehicle File Lieutenant Cusick November 13, 1980 STAFF REPORT To: City Manager Barry Evans From: Director of Public Safety Richard W. Schaller - .Subject: New Police Vehicles � f - - -- - -- - -�- - ""' V.. w• .. r... r. y.rw.s.s..n.y..'cwr.no:w.w. i .Proposal It is proposed that the City Council authorize the purchase of six 1981 LTD police vehicles from Ridgedale Ford and approve the appropriate transfers between accounts within the 1980 budget of the Police Department. Background In accordance with our advertisement, the following bids were received on November 12, 1980, for the purchase of six 1981 police patrol ' vehicles : Buerkle Buick Co. $8,807.90 each Merit Chevrolet Co. $8,879.86 each Malkerson Motors, Inc. $8,960.00 each Buerkle Buick Company was unable to meet our specifications, leaving Merit Chevrolet Company the low bidder. Chevrolet Division does not have their police vehicle engine approved as yet and does not intend to begin production until March 1981 with delivery in April or May 1981. Our present vehicles will need replacing prior to those dates. In evaluating these bids, a comparison was made with bids submitted to other police agencies. ' As a result, it was determined that Hennepin County currently had an open.bid with Ridgedale Ford for police patrol vehicles meeting our specifications for $8,107.96, or a savings of approximately $872 per vehicle. In absence of a formal .joint purchasing agreement with Hennepin County, authori- zation to the bid to our department is required from the dealer.- -Mr. Jerry Benson of Ridgedale Ford agreed to extend the bid to us, however, the factory price protection assuring that price expired on November 13, 19800 Since Ridgedale Ford submitted the bid to Hennepin County, Ford Motor Company as well as General Motors has had two price increases. Our 1980 police budget has $44,360 authorized for the purchase of 1981 vehicles, or approximately $4,290 less than will be required. In contrast, our police gasoline fund has a surplus which will cover the increased costs of the vehicles. Proposal It is proposed that the City Council authorize the purchase of six 1981 Ford LTD police patrol vehicles from Ridgedale Ford and approve a budget transfer from Account 101 -121 -4210 in the amount of $4,290 into Account 101 - 121 -4610. RWS : j s 7j(� cc Finance Director Budget File Lieutenant Cusick 1 ' 1 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FRFROM Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Home Occupation Permit LO- EATION : Elm Street and Kohlman Avenue AP Pi- I CANT : An thbny Lehman PROJECT: window Washing Service DATE: September 4, 1980 Regu_es t Approval exception to operate an office for window washing business pp royal of a specs from the applicant's future home. . i t i s a roved, the applicant will construct his house in Maplewood If the permit PP at Elm Street and Kohlman Avenue. Si to Description 1. Lot Si ze : 12,000 square feet. 2. Existing Land Use: Undeveloped. Past Action Nay 1976' the subject property, was directed by hart es Di ers , the pre v� ous owner of ? to the w� th Ma ewood s ordinances relating Ramsey County Court to comply hborhoods parking o f comrierci al vehicles in residential nee g Proposed Land Use See attached letter dated August 18, 1980 Surrounding Land uses See attached letter dated August 18 19800 Nor therly: Kohlman Avenue an d single family dwelling therl :Sin 1e �fami ly dwelling S0 • � y 9 railroad .tracks Eas terly: Two vacant lots and ra • m Street and single family dwell _ Westerly: E1 _ P1 anni n Consideration • Density Resi dents al 1. Land Use Plan Designation: RL, Low y . dwelling) R -1, Residence District (Single 2. Zoning 3. Section 904.010 (5) of the Zoning Code permits offices of professional persons vi-hen 1 ocated i n the dwel 1 i ng of that prof essi oval person, but only by the r authorization of the City Council. 4. This Code further states that there shall not be any commercial vehicl or heavy equipment parked or stored on a residential lot, unless the vehicle is kept in a residential garage. S. The Sign Code limi home occupation signs to two square feet i n_ .Ti ze and wall mounted. _ Anal ys i s Staff does not have any serious concerns over this proposal. As the Applicant indicates, there w i l l not be an y work P e rf ormed on the premises. The home occupation permit, therefore, will be merely for an office use. Staff's p rimary rimar concern is that as the Appl, i c ant acquires more equipment, it may begin to accumulate in the yard. In reference to the commercial vehicles, the City has been permitting commercial vehicles if they are no larger than pick -up trucks or step vans. The Applicant's vehicles should be acceptable. Recommendati on Approval of a home occupation permit for a window washing business, based on the findings that: 1 . The home occupation w i l l only amount to a business office use 2. Office uses are permitted under the Code with a Special Exception 3. The use should be compatible with the neighborhood Approval is subject to the following conditions 1. The Applicant shall apply for a renewal of the home occupation permit after one year from the date of this approval , to determine if the business has caused any nuisance 2. There shall be no outdoor storage of equipment associated with the business, other than a pick -up truck, 3. Conditions a -h of the Planning Commission guidelines for home occupations. shall be met. (See enclosures) . Enclosed: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line Map 3. Applicant's letter dated 8 -18 -80 4. Pl a _` i ng Commi i on Cui deli nes �,A i t r - BEAM :• AVE. BEAM • . .M_i r I _ / • V n ------ - _ter ^1• -r _�w+ ` . - --- -- --- r- o -_ ir Koh /m o n _ o i _.--_ -- AVE. ` Q --J -- .- K 0 H L MAN r.� t z W W :2 D3 / � COUNTY ROQ f i + �--- -� Q 2 Ln w D L v Q W 31 Q by E Z z z � Q LL j t W yv Q " U) J Z D E M T LjL AV E- o �. 4. IBR OOK Ai yE . ' ' - n 7-IrO ., m L LD S �' i r � �I Q .y7� . uj m Q SEXTA NT AVE. G ERVAIS G _ AV A G ANDVIEW AVE. VIK I F 7DR. j I SHERREN AVE - 1 E . �n C Ke Ile r �: �- � BAR AVE. LARK av E. D LARK 4 vE. N � -� U TY F R LAUR RD. 2 RD. CO p < Loke O _ d = 4G 25 =1 L� A N HUR 7 z AVE. R I 1� 1 p LELAND � z. Cr v JU .. v 'I L-Aw- A%. 1 ar AVE. �- BU KC AVE BU RKE m o h� c p �. rLDRIDG E -j AVE 3 N + v `n W BELMON AVE . N 64 a AvE > I J SK v VE v ' N m AV _ HAR RIS D S� R� Q 'AVE ' J ROSE >MV�OD AvE. W D Q D R Y p t1 m ✓�i 5� R Y A N Oy ,�. J Q C RvL R R" z i 28 �I 28 FROST 10 tn AVF • 22 50 a IF - W FE NT.ON AVE. F la < ¢ �r b 21 W PETITIONER Anthony Lehman REQUEST Home Occu ation Location Map �j �- u _ tom! AO Ic Ina. ev- J _ jj � CID 4 J!, C 4 -I) � � t 1 ��� :1 �� 1 J � I i � 1 I � - 3�.� , 7 7 Ll 1 i • ' r ILI is f 91 0 . ......... -CO U NTY rn PETITION Anthony Lehman RE-QUEST Home occupation Property Line Map Insured Service HAUPT WINDOW CLEANING CO. COMPLETE JANITOR SERVICE OFFICE BUILDINGS - HOMES STORES FACTORIES 1011 East Third Street Saint Paul, Minnesota 55106 Au 1& 19&G Phone 2241169 Dear Gentleman; tern permission to hp ve an Office in my I a��j re r s _ � g P ?zi s C om an ha.s 3 ovill a window Cleaning Company . T p y home. . s- , with the �'ubli c comlrlg t o ray home no u �zing t o do w f whi ch I live* plot selling anyt�i.ing frorr� the premises o . one employee , who i s my Brother. There is no 1 h o ive , debree of r equipment laying around a.s there none. All we use is a. bucket of water, poles, and a. f ladders, which stays inside the truck �.t a,11 times. There a-re stays are my personal. vehicles, and the - three vetz�cles.Y r , m-,an Pi c�_ —up Truck. T�-qo o� the vehicles ocher is a C o _ y attached to my will be parked inside a. two car ga-rag e . vehicle will be barked along sic the home. The other - for it. Ouch a.s a. Carport) . ga.ra.ge , on a. place 3ra.de Fee free re e t o contact me if there a-re any further -i questlons. Thanking you, Tony Lehman D.B.A. Haupt window Cing. Co. PLANNING COMMI $S I ON GUIDELINES FOR * NOME OCCUPATIONS ' Commission concurs with the need for an appropriate definition M e, pla nnl �n g 3 f riom P e Occupation It is also felt that while certain occupations require rh issuance of a special use permit, other activities such as those that do not L nvol ve an y of .the following should be a l lowed - without a permit: a Erg to ent of any person not residing in the dwelling unit. } P � _ ..b)Customers visiting the premises c )manu f ac tune of products on the premises., 7h e -Planning proposes -- Commission ro oses the following guidelines for -a Home Occupation Homo Occupation requiring a permit is defined as that occupation conducted in a dwelling unit involving the manufacture and or sale of of a product or service subject to the following limitations : a is conducted on a continuing basis, that is, for' more then 30 days } out of the year. b) Not more then one person other then members of the family residing on the premises shall be allowed to engage in such occupation. , c� The use of the premises for the home occupation shall be clearly incidental and subordinate to its use for residential purposes by its occupants, aLid no more than an area equivalent of ?0% o the dwelling unit f loor area shall be used in the conduct of the home occupation; a) There shall be no change in the outside appearance of the building or premises, or other visible evidence of the conduct of such home occupation other than one sign, not exceeding one square foot in area, non-illuminated, and mounted flat against the wall of the principal building. e) There shall be no retail sales of products produced off site in connection with such ho.me occupation. No traffic shall be generated by such home occupation in greater volumes f than Would normally e ex ected in a resident } y p en r is 1 ne ig.�borhood , and the need for off-street parkin.- shall noL exceed more than three of f- street parking spaces for the home occupation at any g iven ti- -addition to the parking spaces required by the resident occupants; - In no event shall such number of off-street parking spaces exceed a total of five such spaces f or the premises and shall be of f of the street other than in a required front yard; NQ equipment or process shall be used in such home occupation which creates 5 } noise vibration dare fu mes, u-nes, odors, or electrial interference detectable to the normal senses off - the Jot, if the occupation is conducted in a single family residence, or outside the d unit if .conducted in other than a single family residence. In the case of electrical interference, no -equipment or process shall be used which creates visual or audible inter- ference in any radio or television receivers off the premises, or causes fluctuations in line voltage off the premises, ' exist for the r9i dents h �10 fire , or health hazzard Imployeeo hall of the dwelling unit, customers o to . ULU DU3114L33 A. Special Exception - Elm and Kohlman (Lehman) Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting approval of a special exception to operate an office for window washing business from his future home. Staff is recommending approval as outlined in their report. Mr. Lehman was present and said he would answer any questions. Commissioner Howard asked the applicant what v e h i c l e s - w o u l d be at the ' property. - Mr. Lehman said he has a van and a pickup truck. Commissioner Howard suggested there should be a requirement that the pickup truck also be kept under cover. Com»i ss i oner Whitcomb moved that the Planning Commission recomme_.�r d to the City Council oval o the home occ ati on permit t for a window washing business, based on the fi nd ngs tha t: - 1. The home occupation w i l l only amount to a business office use 2. Office uses are permitted under the Code with a special exception 3. The use should be compatible with the neighborhood 4 10 -20 -80 Approval is subject to the following condi ti ons : 1. The applicant shall apply for a renewal of the home occupation permit after one year from the date of this approval, to determine if the business has caused any nuisance 2. There shall be no outdoor storage of equipment associated with the business, other than a pickup truck 3. Conditions a - h of the Planning Commission guidelines for home occupations shall be met. Commissioner Fischer seconded Commissioner Howard moved an amendment to delete "other than a pickup truck" from condition # "` Commissioner Pel l i sh seconded Voting on the motion as amended: Ayes -6 Nays - 3 ( Commi ssi oners Fischer, Wh,i tcomb, El 1 efson) ,. Ayes - all 10. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS 11. STAFF PRESENTATIONS 12. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 8:58 P . M. on b AG U_L MEMORANDUM TO: City"'Manager FROM: Director of Community Deve lopment SUBJECT: Amendment to Zoning Code - Resi-denti al DATT_ : October 1, 1980 ly OtI.I1C: Estate District Endo C;d-.r � � V � � -L � � \i+_armtil Y�e►aa��aalli Request Amend the City's Zoning Code to establish a Residential Estate (R -E) Di strict. Purj ose To ar rotect l l singl fami neighborhoods from subdivisions which would p 9 result in lots out of character wi the remainder of the neighborhood. Summag of Existing Code The mini rum l requirements in an R -1 zone are 10,000 square feet of area and 75 feet or 100 feet of frontage, dependent upon whether it is an interior or corner lot. Past Actions January 15 1976: The City Council indefinitely tabled the establishment of a Residential Estate Zoning District. The zone had been proposed to encourage developers to utilize the planned unit development approach to develop environ- mentally sensitive areas. The Council's concern was that the proposed minimum lot sizes of 20, 000 and 40,000 square feet had the potenti of bei ng . counter- productive i . e g p driving n u the cost of housing and idling land otherwise ready for development. April 17 1980: Council requested that Staff research the possibility of establishing a Residential Estate Zoning District, with a minimum lot area of 20 square feet. This request was made after Council consideration of a proposed l division for voya Pi 1 eti ch in the large lot neighborhood west of Keller Lake, along Arcade Street. Se tember=18 1980: Council endorsed the R -E District concept, but referred the P , matter back to Staff for further study. Council's concern was that if P os the -pro- ed were to be ap i ed i,,n - devel opi ng areas, undesirable l confi gur _ concept p pp .ati -ons could result... ' That is, with a proposed minimum wi dth requirement of only 75 feet, conceivably a by 400 foot lot would be created to meet - an area requirement of 30,000 square feet. _ = Housing Plan Policy l: Page 31 (proposed Plan , maintain and where necessary strengthen the character of individual neighborhoods* i should 1 d res ect established i shed hous i n values of the area 2. Page 45, all housing p g in which it is located to the degree that human values, natural beauty and urban amenities are not sacrificed. a' 3. Pagq 48, the community should develop land-use regulations which encourage a planned approach to housing areas by providing a variety of lot sizes and-housing densities which complement the area' -s land use plan and the desired dwelling types. - Mi r"mum* Lot Width In accordance with the Council's September 18, 1980 directive to refer the lot 'width issue back to Staff for further study, a survey f existing n platted lots Y gP within the City was conducted. Typical widths for 20,000, 30,000 and 40,000 (proposed R -E District categories) square foot lots approximated 100, 120 and 140 feet, respectively. For the most part, these lots were 300 feet or less in depth. Important the vast majority of these large lots were found to be well maintained, Based upon the above information, Staff suggests the following R -E District minimum lot widths: • R -E (20) - 100 feet R -E (30) - 120 feet R -E (40) - 140 feet In all cases these minimums encourage lots of less than 300 feet in depth in an attempt to avoid yard maintenance problems, Analysis The primary objective for proposing the R -E District concept, at this time, is to provide property oviners in large lot neighborhoods with some assurance that the unique characteristics of their neighborhoods w i l l be preserved. Development of the concept is in response to recently proposed lot divisions affecting the Arcade Neighborhood (west of Keller Lake, east of Arcade Street) . No other application of the concept is being considered at this time. Similar action was taken by the City Council when the BC (M), Business Commercial (Modified) District was adopted to specifically address development south of Beam Avenue. City Code presently makes no distinction among single family residential neighborhoods, regarding minimum lot area requirements I n the instances of large lot neighborhoods, Maplewood property owners presently have no guarantee that the characteristics which may have been a primary factor in the decision to purchase, will remain intact over time. The R -E District proposal is an effort to provide such assurance. This concept would also be in keeping with a Housing 9 Pi an _.policy that calls for "maintenance and where necessary strenghtheni ng of the d-haracter of individual neighborhoods." Staff believes that there will be few - neighborhoods where this zoning district wou 1 d - be . appropri_ate . 2 In 1976, the Council indefinitely tabled a proposal for establishing an R -E District, pri nci pally as a tool for controlling development in environmentally sensitive areas. Although large lot zoning can be used as such, it is not the most effective tool available. The principal purpose of large lot zoning is to maintain low densities, not to protect the environment. If the Council wishes to - addre -ss the protection of environmentally sensitive areas, lot zoning should not be relied upon Rather, environmental performance standards should be -adopted and tied to the land via an Overlay Zoning di stri ct(s) .= The City's Critical Area Plan currently employs an example of the Overlay Zoning District concept. Recommendation Amend the City's Zoning Code to include a Residential Estate District as follows: 919. R-E. RESIDENCE ESTATE DISTRICT 919.. 010. INTENT. To protect and enhance the 'Character of single family neighborhoods, composed of lots substantially larger than required in R -1, (single dwelling) Residence Districts 919.020. PERMITTED USES. Any use permitted in a R -1, Residence District (single dwelling) 919.030. ACCESSORY USES. Any accessory use permitted in an R-1, Residence District (single dwelling), except: 1 . Used car lots 2. The wrecking of automobiles or trucks including the sale of used cars 3. Mobile Home Parks 919.050. DISTRICT STANDARDS. 1 . Minimum Lot Area. The minimum lot area shall be determined by the City Council at the time of rezonin3, but shall be li i.fed to 20 30,000 or 40,000 square feet. The Council shall base their decision on the character of developed lots within an existing neighborhood or on the desired character of lots in an undeveloped area, Minimum lot area requirements shall be designated on the Zoning map in each R -E District's 'title, e.g.,, . R -E (30) , standing for a minimum lot area of 30,000 square feet. Once established, any request to change a district's minimum lot area requirement shall be processed as a request for rezoning, 2. Minimum Lot - Width at. the Building Setback Line. a. Existing neighborhoods to be determined by the- City Counci 1 based on a width which is characteristic of - developed lots but not less than 75 feet. 10 b. New Development: h R -E (20) - 100 feet R- E (30) - 120 feet R -E (40) - 140 feet 30 Mi nimum Setbacks. As required for R -1 , Residence District (single dwelling). _ 40 Maximum Building Height. As requi red for R -1, Res i dence Di strict (single dwelling). 5. Legally buildable lots before the rezoning to an R -E zone shall be considered buildable after rezoning to an R -E zone. 1 Action by Council; MEMORANDUM Endo r, A Rej ectc-.d ,.. Date--... TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development A b�f � - SU Code Amendment - Double Dwellings in R -1 Zones _ "7 - DATE: September 15, 1980 "s The Problem The City t y Counci 1 has asked the Planning Commi ssi on for a recommendation on the location of double dwellings 40 i n R -1, Single Dwelling Residential zones* City Policies 1. The Comprehensive ve Plan states that the Low Density Residential classification "designed for a mixed variety of single family housing styles with an � s _ occasional interspersing of double dwellings" (p. 143 ) 2. The Planning Commission is recomriiendi ng, that this section be revised in the Plan update to read as follows: "An occasional double dwelling may be allowed by special use permit, where specific criteria 1 i sted in the zoning ordinance are met for location and design" (p. 151) . 3. The R and F, Farm Residence sections of the Zoning Code state the following: "Two-family uses mi 1 includi structures and land elements that meet R -2 double dwelling tin district standards, may be permitted by a special use permit. All property owners within 350 feet shall be notified of the public hearing. It being the intent of this p rocedure to allow an occasi interspersing of the double dwellings in R -1 and Farm Residence districts that are con- sistent with the Comprehensive P1 an" . Other Citi Policie of Cities in the enclosed survey require a rezoning to build a The majority . double-dwelling in a s ingle-dwelling neighborhood. The rest allowed them by special use permit. Only two. of the five cities using special use permi had } written c riteria. These cri however, were for special use permi in general and do not specifically apply to double - dwellings* Past Acti ons • owed double dwell i n s i n R -1 zones only Pr or to 10- 27- 77 , the City Council allowed 1 9 ,� by rezoning to R -2 Double Dwelling. Thirty- three double dwel 1 i ngs have been constructed in R -2 zones. One additional building i s under construction 10- 27 -77. " Council passed an ordinance allowing double dwellings in Farm an R -1 zones by special use permit 4 904.010. USE REGULATIONS . In this R -1 , residence di sti rct, no building or land shall 1 be used and no building shall be erected, converted or altered unless otherwise provided herein except structurally for one or more of the following uses: 8. Two-fa 1 uses "including all structures and land elements that meet f amp y standards may _ R -2 double dwelling district. � be permitted by a speci al .� All property owners within 350 feet shall be notified of -- use permit. p P y ► the public c heari n g . It being the intent of this procedure to allow an occas ional onal inters p ersi ng of the double dwellings in R -1 and farm residence districts that are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The special use permit was approved for three reasons: 10 It avoids "spot zonings" for double dwellings 2. - I t allows ows the City to attach conditions to the permit that may ensure compatibility with single - family homes • ti ti on i s not requi red 3. I t � s easier to process , i n that a pe and i t can be approved majority d with a ma •ori t vote, rather than the 4 -1 vote required for a rezoning ed a special al use permit ouble dwelling north of t for a 12 -8 -77: Council approved p p 1774 McMenemy Street, subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval by the City of a lot split 2. Submis of a su rvey ver ifying that the new lot line will not violate minimum required setbacks 3. Compliance with all Building and Fire Codes 4. Construction of driveway turn- 'arounds 5. Agreement to above in wri ting There was no neighborhood objection. The double dwelling has not been built. 12 - - 78. C ouncil pp a • ci l a roved special use permit at 1899 Phalen Place for one. do uble dwelling in in a single- ,'fami ly residential zone. There year to maintain a do 9 were two neighbors hbors i n opposition. Staff has delayed bringing this to the Council for renewal, until the moratorium is lifted and new guidelines established. There were two neighbors in opposition. • permit to construct a double dwell i 1 =18 -79: Council approved a special use p _ A venue, west of Clarence Street. There were four dents i n on Larpenteur A _ oppos i ti on. I 2 -1 -79: Council approved a special use permit to construct a double - dwelling at Mi nnehaha Avenue and Ferndale Street, subject to the condition that, "The Natural drainage channel not be obstructed or modified in any manner without the approval of the City Engineer. A grading plan with sufficient floorage easements shall be required to be submitted for approval, before issuance of a building permit." There were three neighbors in opposition. The building has not been constructed. 3 -1 -79: Council approved a special use permit to convert a sing e-dwel l i ng hone into a duplex at 1644 Myrtle Street, with the condition that the house be brought up to Building Code standards. There was-no neighborhood opposition. 4- 19 -79: Council approved a special use permit to convert a single family dwelling into a duplex at 2607 N. Ari el Street, with the condition that four ., off - street parking spaces be provided. There was no neighborhood opposition. 8 -2 -79: Council approved a special use permit to construct a double - dwelling at, Mi nnehaha and Mayhi l 1 Road, with the condition that driveway turn arounds be constructed. There was no neighborhood opposition. The building has not been constructed. 9 -20- 79: Council approved a special use permit to expand and continue use of an existing duplex . at 865 N. Century Avenue, subject to: 1. The provision of a driveway turn around 2. Meeting fire and life safety codes Two neighbors were in opposition. 12-6-79: Council rezoned 486 -488 E1 dri dge ' Avenue from R -1 to R -2 to allow the construction of a double d w e l l i n g . There were six neighbors in opposition. 1 -3 -80: Council established a moratorium on the construction and issuance of building permits for double dwellings in R -1 zones for a period not to exceed one year. The moratorium was established after considering a special use permit for the construction of a double dwelling at Payne and Rosel awn Avenues. There were marry neighbors in opposition. 2 -7 -80: Council referred thet special use permit at Payne Avenue and Rosel awn Avenue to the Planning Commission. 8 -7 -80: Council referred the moratorium to the Planning Commission. Alternatives 1 Amend the R -1 and F districts to delete the section allowing double dwellings y b special al use permit. t. Double dwellings could then only be permitted in R -1 or . P F districts by rezoning. 2. Continue to allow double-dwellings by special use. permit, bolt add specific* criteria for location and design. 3 A Past history in Maplewood has shown that double-dwellings have a place in R -1 zones. Some act as a buffer, between single-dwelling homes and apartments. Other double dwellings are located in the middle of single dwelling neighborhoods. They appear to be compati bl e wi th. these nei ghborhoods and i n some_ cases are better mai ntai ned than the average single-dwelling house in the area. Enclosed is a list of -the double dwellings in the City and a map with thei-r locations. Council should try to vi ew . some or all of these homes to get a fi hand look at the situation. The two alternatives for approval of double-dwellings in R -1 zones are rezoning and special use permit. A rezoning would require a petition by neighboring property owners or Council initiation and at least a 4 - 1 vote for approval. A special use permit does not require a petition and may be approved by a simple majority. The rezoning would, therefore, make it more difficult to put a double dwelling in an R -1 zone and would, therefore, be less desirable for future double dwelling builders. The petition would be an advantage to Council in giving an early indication of neighborhood support or opposition. An advantage of a rezoning is that it is easier to defend a denial in court, than a special use permit. (See enclosed memo from the City Attorney) . Developers, however, may not go to court, since court costs and lost time may not justify the increased profit from a double-dwelling. A disadvantage of a rezoning is that Counci 1 could not control the design of the building to assure compatibility with the neighborhood, unless the Community Design Review Board ordinance was amended to include double-dwellings. Most of the cities in the enclosed survey require a rezoning. Although, those cities using special use permits have not had any difficulty. The previous Council that adopted the special use permit procedure felt that an occasional double- dwelling in an R -1 zone was acceptable. This Council seems to want more control, based on their reaction to the request for a double - dwelling at Payne and Rosel awn Avenues. Substituting a rezoning procedure for the special use permit procedure would, therefore, be the best solution. I would, however, encourage Council to approve rezoni ngs for individual double dwellings where they would be compatible with the neighborhood. Recommendati ons I . Rescind Sections 903.010 (8) and 904.010 (8) of City Code a l l o w i n g double- dwellings in R -1 zones by special use permit.' II. Rescind the moratorium on double dwellings in R -1 zones. III. Amend Section 202.150 (1) of the Community Design Review Board ordinance to include the review of double- dwellings Enclosures: _ Survey of other cities Coon Rapid's criteria Woodbury' s cri teri a l i s t and map of existing double dwellings City Attorney's opinion 4 c Survey of Selected Cities Double Dwellings in R -1 Zones The - following cities do not allow double dwellings in R -1 zones. I ndi vi dual 1 o ts-- mus t be rezoned Brooklyn Park Maple Grove Minneapolis Moundsview Plymouth St. Louis Park St. Paul South St. Paul West St. Paul The following cities allow double dwellings in R -1 zones by special use permit: Bloomington - No specific criteria. Approval is on a case by case basis. They encourage a mix of units. Coon Rapids - The City has eleven criteria for approving special use permits in general. (See attachment) They also review building plans for doubles in R -1 .Zones Fridley No specific criteria. Approval is on a case by case basis. White Bear Lake - All multiple dwellings must be approved by special use permit. There are no multiple zones. They do not have specific criteria for special use permits. Approval is on a case by case basis. Woodbury - The City has nine criteria for approving special use permits i n general. (See attachment) { e " Coon Rapids' Special Use Permit Criteria 11 -316 Standards for Special Uses, Certain uses, while normally not suitable in a zoning district due to nuisance characteristics or in- compatibility with permitted uses, are suitable under special circumstances. A use may be permitted as a special use in a zoning district if the following findings are made: (1) The special use is in conformity with the City's Future land Use Plan; with its Goals and Policies and w PP -with the purpose, intent and applicable — P standards of this Title; (2) The establishment or maintenance of the special use `hall not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; (3) The special use shall be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the existing or intended character of that zoning district. (4) The special use shall not depreciate property values; - (5) The special use shall not be hazardous,' detrimental Cr disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses due to noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances; (6) The special use shall generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and - shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause inconvenience to the adjoining properties; (7) The special use shall be served adequately b essential p ublic . Y Y P services such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks; (8) The special use shall not create excessive additional require- ments at public cost for public facilities and services; and shall not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the City; (9) The special use shall preserve and incorporate the site's important natural and scenic features into the development design; (10) The special - -use shall cause minimal adverse environmental effects; and (11) The City Council may waive one or more of the above require- ments upon receipt of an application for a special use permit for a public building or utility structure, provided the Council shall first make a determination that the balancing of public interest between P olitical subdivisions of the state would be best served by such waiver. 11 --317 Su pplementary Condit ions* Repealed ons Rev. 6 -6 -78. 11 -16 Woodbury' s Special Use Permit Criteria "5.03 (B) Criteria for .Granting Special Use Permits IZ granting Z . a special use permit, the City Council shall consider the advice and-recommendations-of the Planning Commission and shall make written ----- ! findings . regarding the effect of proposed use upon the Health, _ safety, moral - s, and general welfare of occupants., surrounding lands, existing and anticipated-traffic including parking facilities on adjacent streets and land, and the effect on values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area, and the effect of the proposed use on the comprehensive plan. If it shall determine by resolution that the proposed use will not he detrimental to the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the City of Woodbury, nor-will cause serious traffic conjestion or hazards, nor will seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and that said use is in harmony with the 5eneral purpose and intent of this ordinance and the comprehensive plan, the City Council may grant such permit. i In the review of the application, the Council shall make additional written findings that satisfactory provision and arrangement has been made concerning the following, where applicable: 1. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon and with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe; 2. off-street parking and loading areas where required, with particular attention to the items in (1) above and the economic, noise, glare, or odor effects of the special exception on adjoining properties and properties generally in the district; 3. refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the items in (1) and (2) above; 4. utilities, with reference to locations, availability and compatibility; • 5. screening and buffering with reference to type, dimensions and character; 6. signs, if any, and proposed exterior lighting with refer- ence to glare, traffic safety, economic effect, and compatibility and harmony with properties in the district; 7. required yards, ratios .,and other open space requirements; B. general compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district;. -= 9. compatibility with the land use plan and development policies of the city. The written findings of the Council shall be filed with the application for the special use permit."' EXISTING DOUBLE DWELLINGS MAP KEY ADDRESS 1 1681 East County Road C 2 -= 2800 -02 White Bear .Avenue 3 2835 -37 Frederi ck 4 2512 -14 Woodlyn 5 571 -3 East County Road B 6 1110 -20 Leland 7 2607 Ari el Street (converted single ) 8 177-75 Larpenteur 9 163 - 65 Larpenteur 10 1712 -14 Jackson 11 1700 -02 Jackson 12 1724 Abel 13 1710 -12 Gurney } 14 1709 -11 Gurney } A 5 1713 -15 Gurney } 16 -23 8 doubles on Bradley and } Eldridge, north of Skillman } B Units are split } 24 486 -88 Eldridge (see 16 -23) Unit is split 25 2049 -51 Desoto } C 26 _ -439 -41 Skillman } 27 - 1731 -3.3 Duluth - nonconforming } D 28 1745 -47 Duluth } 29 1899 Phalen Place - converted single ZON ING T YPE - � R -2 R -2 R -2 R -2 R-2 SUP R -2 R -2 R -2 R -2 R-2 R -2 R-2 R -2 R -2 SUP R -2 R -2 =R-2 SUP e 30 1718 English R -2 31 1970 -74 Dieter R -2 32 1945 -47 MaryknolI R -2 33 2115 Hazelwood _ R -2 34- 2116 Barclay = R -2 35- 1474 -76 El dri_dge R -2 36 1894 Manton - nonconforming 37 1938 -40 Clarence - nonconforming 38 1333 -31 Earpenteur SUP 39 2176 -78 Ripley R -2 40 1644 Myrtle - converted single d w e l l i n g SUP 41 1630 McKnight R-2 42 1197 -99 Glendon - split ) Maple Greens PUD 43 } 2565 -63 Geranium - split ) Maple Greens PUD 44 2599 -97 Geranium - split ) E Maple Greens PUD 45 } 1165 -69 Ferndale - split ) Maple Greens PUD 46 1111 -13 Ferndale - split ) Maple Greens PUD 47 865 N. Century - addition to nonconforming SUP 48 964 -966 McKnight South SUP INS b1l �I ` f G • � C 0 E _� a cl H !'� 01 S! «� w' 1 K ~d L 00 1111....... 1•. • 1111_ . b � w . r MUNICIPAIM OF Welt NA LA4 .+ I -will MAPLEWOOD Cal ,.0121.1. ♦alatl _ 1 ! 81 no MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF MCWWAYS a txxJrl " Tim 10 taw 0 �• ,:.I _ - U S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPQATATTON 1 1 r / A 1111... 1''EDEPAL HIGHWAY ADMIMSTRATION 1 / gon IL ��_�_r. ` -' _ ritw -�:t _ � 1111.., O .��.�.. - a 1111. '��• ��� #• •.•• *• -- •- 1.._._ rat DATA tstrAJStI� 2170 a" tavAiwr n qp TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSIT PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING DIVLSION � ` ■` � 1 _ 1111. 3 �- � � • �' 1111 �"" t � � , L �C +. .. ` y..K lc;,. L r► .� . 1 X400 M. 00 ' _.J.' i L1 wr �► w 4 r .' �.1 • ;1111. •'.,3r , u.ri� � e n li CILIMA! tArAM - Ul 21iSt1l. •�' _ � d 11 � 1111 1 :... � p y✓ -�� rr..•�10 JW ► /� 1 w war • � 1••h � 1 �� 1 ! t �' � 1 • ,1111. - ., _ `�.. u / � " �w�.�;.� 3 :.,u.. ---` �I_..•% , 1111 I Aar ) I - li�.t[ 7. �' r... 1111• w..��!Ai `! r � Tt ..a p 1 � 11,,, 1111. - 1111 � -• 6 •- ! t 1 = t / 1 1111. " oM�. ►. �.• 21 I ! w . _. t � I r 't � �MJIt'•. I..•• _ _' .a �__ry ( - Ile. Irk•... '1111 - , A , ► S, ft� 30 3g n..AUI wr11N► 11 ` AtMI tit. a-{ 0 tWOTr et r t• t•1 wAUIf Art. le - Mirtl lA Alt. r• Sarr/alAfl M eet st. P Yw/ tn. 41.71 IM.rifrt• An a.l - 7.10 "AIt"a teat' .•15.16 f[ »t1»1rA to r - IO ' 1ta I I TyS if 1 - 1.1 t►trt tt, 21.17 wftlres Art l tT %has Arl • -1► ftAalt ft. 010 amv sr. a -{ r• AY• r -► 21\7.7 101 1••,► II•tw f►. c•s.t strlrt s1. a lt -te "Alt M IIor1 art. r•) »UIIMIoe Sl, a.r -1 TO • M►ll late I" SIMI" Awt a•) 440N. Mlra h. r•.• wl at►• rl t -• ►tary tr1ty Art. J-) f/y 21.17 4114 t.l -S alm AN $7 t•1, 5.1,1,{ 01.21,10 \Art l•1) wl �.• I art t -i7.7o wary Ilam? M I.t,t - 1 Te • swt►Ia 21117 r -� ►e.Iit St. J-5 ,.fete 10711 t -A.1•{ mou. AT 1141111's t., -• wraUttT •wt 7.11 S11llI►tr a1K. 0,[,t.T.t - saalAlis" !T. 7 tlltc► st hS.e •TsrTlt /•a, 5.t aot t►ae "at r•15.t7 011 90^9100 Arl 1,1 - "Pull lT P - ft 21.1, ►l t -) Parrs W. t - •Illvoos M. ■ - Ma• tT.w. 21.1 fldtr ST. r ' 5 .♦ 8 WAVIS 11, I- ),t,1,{ met % ow T W l.a - t-{ Its" 31 P•1,7,tl,tS str"1• Awl. 1-6 11000.1111 cl J -1 nAarutti aw t•0 serlrtt[5T art, a -16 wow S1 J -t.{ wA•nre Ali 21117 -t.7 swfetdk•a so w.I-) t cowr• $0. 1 /e I.1 71117 1+10,1 rlrt !.I-{ "Loser PL a li.t5 *m T000tt awl 0-5.6 SIArralrcl Awl.1 I tutu► lT, t- I.P.S.{ atalwlit to" w•) wttosal to a.L -11 11ATI• I•et t - 13 %lamicw tt 1 -5 eAeltewT LAM .•7.121 7071 tart ti C•{ * IL1 AA L - 1 ) S ►\ 1 trtlta- tA. m0a1. 21.1 i,tr•Tee lt. c.t -7115.{ I►actlttro 51. t-1) errtll.c S. t.1- t.T.7.to.t) el Aw art t.1 .1.r,1,I,t-/ tH1w ti t -10 M•w ltJ/1 V J.l e1•rlr/ ST A -• ItwtO ST. r-6 77"1110 Ml. l•7 It To 1• 111t1va/1• Art /Pte R4r01 ►let, J•1 IlY1t1aI Art, 7110.7 - IM IT i - S•t wttwwt►n S1. t -S, S. St 1I wall* to t.t•1.11 tMlN aYt J•{ llw 101 . {•) IwT Art t•1 wlAegtllAaa l• l•1 S"1ws• Arl. " 716116 Awl a,t•I Ililefr ST. t•1.•.s.• wlrto t1 . 4 .1 5211•,101 M t -► r+ M 1 l1 1 w o •rl 0.0-• r .t • Irlr 21 1 A -10 Irt Tr• Sl 21.10 10771121. ST A -• ":low -" A, I ISI 1 -le 01"7.1 lrl 0. Jaca{em tt. A,t•S.{ ::low "I •l 21[1 l it em tl TTlafrlrT IN" ••5 JAwlf YIr1 1 - wlall I"" Awl t.\ -10.11 01r Art 11.10,17 Jafill fl. t-• "ISSISSINt ST. , -S rUrlloOe M t -15 MY111 S,, C-S.{ rYast St. t-11.17 .01"7710. wt. I.1,1 $1010111 w/trlr Arl. t,t.P-S swat. ST 21,1 -10 /IST011 ST. A.1 -t wntll.t ST 71 Mr•w1a Ml. !. a -t Iralaalr fT 1- 0 10 7.1/7/,00 tM1r1 e•t rinw wt 1 -11 YrPI• Anal of ,21.1 - 1),16 . •ems Net. l.r - / 1000 Some a - T ■LIIr Pev► 1 7.5.1, 07"111 MI. 7.11 "snake r r•1.5.t.1.{ Seat" It rat" ao. 1.6 7217. +IIY M. .2111 t, 011tltavlry tT t - 1) #Best 111 S1 r 1t, r 5,1,1.{ atwmb r t. 7 - S.{ 71175 - •• Ills/ alt 9 .101 n lNalCr roan / -1 at r.10ee Y.v 7 tale OT Sr. 1- 1. T.�Q� �fi ere, 7711 t•1,S Pmrtnlc, tit J - 5 atJi►Ieee u a 0 r1P1rc OAtwl 0117.. - • LJ soM Art t -N hlwerT Art 1.11 ■ISas►7. Awl t.C.q. 14 YatrW Be a -1• ►,11111 art I - 1 - t0w/ ►K. /, { -1 0'Y► claCll a -15 I I AK. t.r ,two -s.{ Rawl wan tAwl a•I 7'M• lT.. t•I) t ton► M r » 1•3,5 rs•IwAr LAMM 1.1 votttsr t,, m -• tAAe TOe t+ . 1.11 rlwlr sa 10.11 rl.7.t Worts Art. s.t•►7 atttutt tsa t - • " ale/ i•t to • 1 taw 49, 1-1-0 Mel art. • -t last 111M 1 .1 1114"~ N /•1 Call", 1. 1•• last fT, t•1 PANAMINT as 0 wwf Tt" Avg ttnw► rl l•1 we A Mr R. r•I t r. e•1. {.1.IH,r• rant art 0-10 t.a wNa! lt. ley «wttw Mt. / -7 U041 art t./,t,w,l -1 ►Iwta h 04 trerrrr• 2171. e•1 7721. 10 R . a -5.1.1 PI•MU war 1 colt. ■ - t •• R 1.21 v/dlTtw a•l ► 10 t rwTllet Cr 21.17 Irlwtl� 7711, t•1 tawAtt all. l.P.t,m. / -/.1 r h t - e .awe Pot a.t•I5 l/IYtll N t, {.0.1 -a Potts tr! 7,7.14 Potts tr! 7,7.14 iL[weoe R. l elf fl P-1 ra710r1•In 210 * .6 to" ll. N aseam h. P•t IfAA/tf lT. 0- t. f.s.0 Mrrrt1IV ►0t. 711.-7 ltlI♦a ,mar P-• 1.1 -11.1! 1.1.7 a trlr mm#1 R. y t/a tan t•1 Combine h . l -1.1 t e Ml�O API a - le 11117111) min . prnrl• a n 17R0ce Pt . a4 tIC[ f' • awl•• R 114 ler►tt l/I1r e.l•IS -5117 can Art 1 -. tat.• Ant". 1121 21.1.15 r/rlrw let t /.C.I.Lr -. C": tYlt t'l/[! H1 trees err. J.9- ,Aflame Nt. 4,9.c. .6 :: Twfgw P. t•If.K.IS aru►Ieer Mt 217.7. ■ - w R H ►010/ve00 art tJ11R» w -s 1 11 91. l•5 $W" St I.J4 ,�� I , � � II _ _ - _ -_ ataw A - _1.f,- 4-- _ -_ -__ Wolff in PAUL OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING t I t 71616 y j ♦aoc O 00 swe OWNS ,e, 11... aw T v ae0 N• t . 4 saw 1101's _ wwr 3 y 1111 12 , r ,_1111. -. 240 N. 13 LEGEND 01 .�...�� 11+11.. •.r wi....r.. 1111 1111. 1111 O I }. w•. r.�� war 1121..." • r areas . ...... •...... Oj t em 1 .. s 11 11... ........ r...• ww r •wiwr. 1111. • �'• � ..�....... 1111.. rtemtTl l� raw . s ru 14 MINIBOOM r t I O w rr M t 4903. i I s M w w. "1111... • 9 16 It ,11,•11•. _ • r err � O . i P P •.�' r V 1 �' 1111 1111 I M /} O 1111 _ �`/br 21st.' e �'�• oil / r 1 _ _ '` ` • •1111 „ L• . Ff. t 11111.:: - A S I • . ♦ � of 1T► 1111 • -a � a x 1 I IrI� 1 ^� .war r •�•• -� 1 r 1 ( 19 •Mir f, 7 1 _' � 1 ' ( ..." • ti !y e t�f • • A�•�► r a to ♦atffl! rwwer yr. wr••wwtTp21 CO �]OC.71 y PI►tPPOPrT SIB w 1111 »w .r r w+•r K L ......•r rr. K L Yr•.Ir.. r an Is a mown - ale rase e7A.'lfrwlw fwr.asw trrt MAP OF EXISTING DOUBLE DnIELLINGS : LAIS, SANNIGAN & CIRESI, P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING STH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 53101 DONALD L. LAIS JOHN F. BANNIGAN. JR JEROME D. CIRESI PATRICK J KELLY .August 26, 1980 AREA CODE 612 224 -8781 Mr. Geoffrey Olson City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Olson: In your letter of August 12, 1980, you request that I take into account the case of Luger vs, City of Burnsville in answering your question stated as follows: "Can the City Council deny or approve a rezoning from R -1, Single Family Residence, to R -2, Double Dwelling Residence for the construction of a double dwelling based on the approval or disapproval of neighborhood residents, if such approval or disapproval is written into the ordinance as a requirement for rezoning "? An analysis of the case and of the cases ci it is my opinion that if such language were requirement for rezoning, the Court would, case, finally have to answer that question. in the Luger case and I refer you to page 7 where the Court says: ted in the Luger case included as a in an appropriate It is not answered of the opinion "We have not stated whether the desires of surrounding property owners may be dispositive of the question of whether a variance may be granted ". and to the final page where the Court held that since the Burns- ville City Council had voted unanimously in favor of the grant of the variance subject to the approval of every abutting property owner and where the property owners did not approve of it _that the City had, nevertheless, granted the variance and had to -issue a building permit, It seems to me that upon a careful reading of this case we find the Court making some very fine distinctions between granting a variance and allowing c! special use permit. In the application for a variance theown6r must come in and prove.. that he is entitled to the variance by. virtue of meeting the test of reasons as . to why such a variance should be granted. If he does that then he should be entitled to the variance. In the case of the special use permit, the situation is di f f erent in that the burden shi f is to the City to show why the special use should not be. allowed. Here again, to include Mr. Geoffrey Olson City of Maplewood August 26, 1980 Page Two a property owners approve the granting ofd either a special use permit or variance or rezoning, for that maTter, seems to be frowned upon by the Court in that it is an improper delegation of authority or legislative responsibility to a small group of the population constituting a municipality. In the one case that the Court took into account.�the objections of the neighboring property owners, it was largely because the owners had demonstrated that the permitting of the construction of an apartment building on the applicant' property , would , in fact, devalue the property of the objecting property owners. It, therefore, seems to me that if the Council wishes to retain control of the R -1 lot and the construction of double dwellings within an R -1 zone, then the Council has the best control by requiring rezoning to R -2 in each instance. To proceed under the special use permit for a double dwelling pretty well guarantees the applicant the right to build a double dwelling on any lot meeting the criteria unless there is substantial evidence suppor- ting a denial of the special use permit. The Legislature might enact in the zoning statutes some language that would give the neighbors abutting owners more say in such a matter as this but,in the absence of statutory authority, I believe the Court would set aside any effort on the part of the Council to allow the abutting property owners to vote upon the granting of a special use permit or upon zoning or rezoning of a specific property. I think that the final paragraph of the Opinion on page 7 where the Court states in its first sentence as follows "The Burnsville City Council is not permitted to escape the political implications of its actions by requiring every abutting property owner to consent to plaintiff' proposal to eonstruct.a home on his land ". is significant in pointing out the Court's attitude in allowing such decisions to be made by citizens without any criteria or guide lines . Ver truly yours, , IS, BANNIAA C REST, P.A. Donald L. Lais DLL /me NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR A CODE AMENDMENT Notice is hereby given that the Maplewood City Council at their meeting of November 6, 1980 at 8:15 P.M. in the Cou x � Chambers of the Maplewood Municipal Building, located at 1380 Frost Avenue, will consider and receive all public remarks regarding rescinding Sections 903.010 (8) and 904.010 (8) of the Zoning Code whi ch permi is doubl e dwel 1 i ngs i n R -1 , Si ngl e Dwelling Residence and IF, Farm Residence Districts by Special Use Permit. Additional information is available at the Department of Cormiunity Development, 1902 East County Road B. Maplewood. ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER ARE INVITED TO ATTEND AND BE HEARD I D. Code Amendment - Doub Dwellings - Secretary Olson said t he Ci Council has asked the P1 anni n Co mm i ssion _ a recommendation on the location of doubt - for double -d l ngs i n R -1 Residential zones. Staff's recommendation on i s outlined in their report of September P 15. The Commission reviewed slides of existing ng duplexes w ithi n the Ci Commissioner Prew moved the P1 anni n C ' ' ' o rr�n� ssi on recommend to the CitY Council approval of the fol l owi n : -- I. Rescind Secti 903.010 8 and } 904.010 (8) of City Code al i� R ] zon y lowing double dwel nes by special use permit. 2. Rescind the moratorium on double . dwe in R -1 zones, 3. Amend Section 202.150 1 of the • } Community Design Review ' g w award Ordinance to include the review of double d w e l l i n g s , Commissioner Barrett seconded Ay - y a11. 4 in -A_Rn PATRICK J. O'CONNOR FREDERICK W. THOMAS JOE A.WALTERS THOMAS A. KELLER III MICHAEL E. MCGUIRE KENNETH B.JONES,JR, ROBERT J.CHRISTIANSON,JR. CHARLES Be FAEGRE FRANK J. WALZ JAMES R. DORSEY ANDREW J. SHEA DOUGLAS M. MZMILLAN CHARLES D. RE.ITE WILLIAM R. MCGRANN WALTER C. PARKINS KENT E. RICHe= JAMES OTIS REYER JAMES A. RUB -ENSTEIN JEREMIAH J. KEARNEY WILLEM F. VAN VLIET THOMAS R. SHERAN JOHN A.BURTON,JR. ROBERT A. BRUNIG FREDERICK W. MORRIS WILLIAM E. FLYNN RANDOLPH J. MAYER DOUGLAS J.1'RANZEN WILLIAM D. HULL DAVID G. KELLEY STEVEN J. TIMMER WILLIAM C. KELLY 1 11918 -1970) OF COUNSEL JOSEPH F. CASTIELLO* FRED D. THOMPSON* Mayor and City Council JOHN H. HOLLOMAN zu* City Maplewood *NOT MEMBER OF MINNESOTA BAR 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Re: (1) Connemara II - Conditions of Building and Site Plan Approval (2) Condor Storm Sewer Project 78 -18 Ladies and Gentlemen: We represent Condor.Corporati.on, the developer of the Connemara condominium project in Maplewood. Condor would like to place the above matters on the agenda for the Council meeting on Thursday, November 20, 1980, as old business. (1) Connemara I -- Conditions of Building and Site Plan'Approval. At the Council meeting on May 11, 1978, the Council approved the building and site plan for Connemara II , subject to certain specified condi- tions. One of those conditions was that Condor dedicate a permanent 20 foot easement to the City, for a contem- plated storm sewer project, "along the drainage channel on the west side of the property." Another condition was that Condor provide a $.75,000 bond to secure its compliance with the approved grading plan. That�.con- dition was subsequently amended to permit Condor to submit a $30,000 letter of credit in lieu of the bond. The letter of credit was provided. i O' CO N N o R & HAN NAN ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 800 1919 PENNSYLVANIA AVE.N.W. THIRTY-EIGHTH FLOOR I D S TOWER WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 80 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET _ (202) 785 —8700 MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA 55402 - PATRICK J. O'CON NOR WILLIAM T. HANNAN * — EDWARD W. BROOKE* JOHN J. FLYNN (612) 341 - 3800 = H. ROBERT HALPER* — JOSEPH E.OILLON TELEX 29 THOMAS H. QUINN* HOWARD G. FELDMAN* TELECOPIER 612 341 DAVID R. MELINCOFF* DELANCEY W. DAVIS* —� RICHARD G. MORGAN THOMAS V. VAKERICS* MYLES J. AMBROSE* VELAZQUEZ, 21 DAVID BURLINGAME* DOUGLAS M. CARNIVAL MADRID I, SPAIN MARTIN M. BERLINER* TERENCE P. BOYLE* 228 40 44 GREGORY A. KEARNS* HOPE S. FOSTER* BRIAN P. PHELAN* TELEX 23543 JACK M. W ESOKY* THOMAS R. JOLLY* SUITE 1100 SECURITY LIFE BUILDING BARRY J. CUTLER* MICHAEL J. CONLON* LOCAL COUNSEL 1616 GLENARM PLACE DONALD S. ARBOUR* FRANK J. WIRGA * DENVER, COLORADO 80202 PETER C. KISSEL* CAROL N. PARK* (303) 573-7737 JOSEPH E. PATTISON* CHARLES W. GARRISON �* OF COUNSEL GORDON K. GAYER* CHRISTOPHER H. MUNCH* ROBERT J. STEELE* CHRISTINA W. FLEPS* MICHAEL E.VEVE* MARTHA PRIDDY PATTERSON * JAMES H. HOLT* November 14 1980 MARY SUSAN M O R RIS* G LEE / * F GORDON OF COUNSEL JOSEPH F. CASTIELLO* FRED D. THOMPSON* Mayor and City Council JOHN H. HOLLOMAN zu* City Maplewood *NOT MEMBER OF MINNESOTA BAR 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Re: (1) Connemara II - Conditions of Building and Site Plan Approval (2) Condor Storm Sewer Project 78 -18 Ladies and Gentlemen: We represent Condor.Corporati.on, the developer of the Connemara condominium project in Maplewood. Condor would like to place the above matters on the agenda for the Council meeting on Thursday, November 20, 1980, as old business. (1) Connemara I -- Conditions of Building and Site Plan'Approval. At the Council meeting on May 11, 1978, the Council approved the building and site plan for Connemara II , subject to certain specified condi- tions. One of those conditions was that Condor dedicate a permanent 20 foot easement to the City, for a contem- plated storm sewer project, "along the drainage channel on the west side of the property." Another condition was that Condor provide a $.75,000 bond to secure its compliance with the approved grading plan. That�.con- dition was subsequently amended to permit Condor to submit a $30,000 letter of credit in lieu of the bond. The letter of credit was provided. Mayor and CiID ty Council Page 2 November 14, 1980 (2) Condor Storm Sewer Project On March 13, 1980, the Council approved a storm sewer project, inclu- ding underground piping, on the westerly portion of the Connemara II site. On August 11, 1980, the City Engineer tendered to Condor a form of easement relating to the project, and requested that Condor sign it. More re- cently, early in November, at Condor's insistence, the City Engineer provided a site plan showing the proposed easement and associated piping, The easement being requested by the City Engineer is a 50 foot easement, not a 20 foot easement. In addition, the easement does not proceed "along the drainage channel on the west side of the property ", but instead along the west property line and then deflecting at'an angle to the easterly end of Johnson's Pond, On November 10, 1980, Condor received a letter from the City Engineer dated November 7, 1980, claiming several defaults in . Condor' s performance of the condi- tions for the approval of the building and site plan for Connemara II. The letter stated that if the defaults were not corrected within 18 days, the City will draw against Condor's $30,000 letter of credit, one of the defaults claimed is that Condor has not completed site grading by filling and grading the drainage channel [where the storm sewer was supposed to be located]. Another default claimed is that Condor has not signed the easement requested by the City Engineer. The actions of the City Engineer, just de- scribed,.are manifestly improper; and inconsistent with the Council's action on May 11, 19780 Condor therefore requests that the Council take the following action: (1) Direct the City Engineer to submit to Condor an easement for storm sewer purposes conforming to. the easement which Condor agreed to provide as= one of the conditions of the approval of the building and site plan for Connemara II. In the alternative, the C - Ouncil. should remove the condition. 6 x t 4 Mayor and City Council Page 3 November 14, 1980 = (2) Direct the City Engineer to withdraw the default claims asserted against Condor. (3) Permit Condor to extend its letter of credit for another year, or until such time as a modi. fied storm sewer project is completed. We are prepared to cooperate fully with the City,in an effort to resolve the problems underlying these matters, and we solicit the Council's participa- tion in that resolution. Yours very truly, Frank J. Walz FJW:emw cc: Mr. John F. Bannigan, Jr. Mr. James R. Riley Act. 1 MVrE by VoVC.i1cil 9 Endorsed L ^ d - i e d Peiected Late MEMORANDUM TO City Manager FROM Finance Director � • ✓C��c -� � - RE Ordinance to Increase Sewer Rates (1st Reading) DATE October 31, 1980 The 1981 Budget for the Sewer Fund was based upon a rate increase effective January 1 ,1981. This report provides 1) A financial history of the past 5 years. 2) Projects cash needs over the next 5 years. 3) Explains rate making requirements mandated by federal and state laws. - 4) Contains supporting calculations for a sewer rate increase and billing frequency changes. FINANCIAL HISTORY 0 The last sewer rate increase was effective January 1, 1980 and was anticipated to cover expenses thru December 1980. When these rates were set, it was determined that small annual increases in rates was preferable to less often large rate increases. A financial history of the Sewer Fund for the past five years is contained in Exhibits A and B. Exhibit A is a condensed version of the annual income state ment for the years 1975 thru 1979 from past annual financial reports. Revenues from customer sewer bi 11 i ngs have i ncreased from $674,577 i n 1975 to $911 ,969 i n 1979. In 1977, revenues jumped by 28/ primarily due to an increase in billing rates. Annual increases other years ranged from less than 1% to 8/ and were caused by increased sewage flow. Operating expenses have increased at a faster rate than revenues. In 1975, expenses were $39,,369 less than revenues and in 1979 were $45,587 greater than revenues. The major operating expense has been sewage treatment provided by the Metro- politan Waste Control Commission (M.W.C.C.). This expense has amounted to approximately two - thirds of the total operating expenses for each of the past five years. The sewage treatment charges bi lled by the M.W. C. C. are based upon sewage flow in units of million gallons per year (M.G.Y.). Treatment charges for the past five years have been as follows: MGY COST PERCENT YEAR FLOW PE MGY INCREASE 1975 1,607 X297.37 12.9 1976 l,469 $362.38 21.9/ 1977 1 $368.33 1.6/ 1978 1 $398.02 8.1/ 1979 1 $444.47 11.7° The average annual increase in M. W. C. C. billing rates for the past five years "has been '11.2/. The large amount of flow for 1975 was the result of infiltration to the sewer system during the extreme wet weather of the second quarter of 19750 Other operating expenses listed in Exhibit A are associated with City mainten- ance and billing costs. These costs have increased as follows: INCREASE CITY YEAR COSTS 1975 $212. 1976 $241,415 - 1977 $315,621 1978 - $310, 1979 $348,705 INCREASE (DECREASE) AMOUNT PERCENT $23,626 _= 12.5/ $28,496 13.4%. _ $74,206 30.7% $(5,508) (1.7/.) $38 12.4/ The average annual increase in City costs for the past five years has been 13.5/. However, this does not take into consideration growth in the size of the syewer system that the City is maintaining. (In 1978 City costs decreased primarily due to a change in the method of allocating insurance premiums.) In summary, over the past five years sewage treatment costs have increased $202,523 and City costs have increased $ Exhibit 6 is a cash flow statement for the past five years. The ending cash balance over the past five years has decreased from $285,496 (44%, of operating expenses) in 1975 to $198,044 (20% of operating expenses) in 1979. This trend has been the result of an effort to eliminate excessive cash balances. FINANCIAL FORECAST Exhibit C is a projected income statement for the Sewer Fund for 1980 thru 1984. The amounts for 1980 and 1981 are based upon the budget. Estimated sewer bill- ings for 1982 -1983 assume an average annual one percent increase in flow and no rate changes. Projected sewage treatment costs for 1982 -1984 are based on an 11.2/ increase in M.W. C. C. rates and an average annual 1% increase in flow. Projected city maintenance and billing costs for 1982 -1984 are based upon an average annual 13.5/ increase which was the average for 1975 -1979. Exhibit C indicates that even with the budgeted increase in sewer billings for 1981, there w i l l still be a $140,430 net operating loss before depreciation. By 1984 this will increase to $669,700. The projected net loss after depreciation will increase from $171,905 in 1980 to $788,410 in 1984. However, for rate setting purposes, the net operating loss before depreciation is more meaningful. This is because depreciation expense is charged on contributed assets (e.g. sewer mains financed by special assessments) and the replacement of these assets is expected to be financed by future special assessments rather than current sewer billing charges. Thus, sewer rates ideally should be set at a rate sufficient to cover operating expenses excluding depreciation. Exhibit D is a projected statement of cash flow for 1980 thrugh 1984. The amounts for 1980 and 1981 are based upon the budget. For 1982 through 1984 the g o eratin loss before depreciation is based upon the amounts in the projected income statement (Exhibit C). The ending cash balance over the next five Y ears in 1980 to a deficit of $1 ,380,921 in 1984. In 1981 , wil l d ec rease from $104,889 even with the budgeted increase in sewer billings for 1981, the ending cash balance will be decreasing to $19,899. However, the estimated 1980 and 1981 expenses include contingency amounts of $32,965 and $60,000. If these amounts are not expended, the 1981 ending cash balance will be $112,864. -2- RATE MAKING LAWS Chapter 473.519 of state law requires that local governments have sewer rates which allocate sewage treatment costs proportionate to usage pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972. These federal regulations have been imposed because the M.W.C.C. receives federal aid for improvements and expansion of the Metropolitan Disposal System. Exhibit E contains guidelines and models for user charge systems published by the M.W.C.C. PROPOSED RATE INCREASES The 1981 Budget has increased sewer billing revenues of $1,156,530 based upon an anticipated rate increase effective January 1, 1981. Even with this increase, operating revenues will be $140,430 less than operating expenses (excluding depreciation) and the cash balance w i l l drop from $104,899 to $19,899. Thus, the following rate increase is necessary to prevent a cash deficit in the Sewer Fund: Overall the proposed rates are approximately 8/ more than the present rates. Supporting calculations for the proposed rates are in Exhibits F and G. It should be noted that the rate calculations result in 3M being charged 10% of the City's billing and sewer administrative costs and no charge for City maintenance costs as 3M performs all of their own maintenance within their headquarters complex. This rate calculation policy for 3M has been in effect since January 1, 1977. 1 The following is a comparison with other cities of quarterly sewer rates on an average single family home: Present Proposed Residential (rate per quarter): Rate Proposed Single Family $ 17.30 $ 18.60 Townhouse 17.30 18.60 Duplex 34.60 37.20 Apartment 13.80 14.90 Condominium 13.80 14.90, Mobile Home 13.80 14.90' Senior Citizen Unit 8.65 9.30 Non - Residential (rate per 1,000 gals.): 18.40 22.10 Class A $ .560 $ .61 Class B $ .863 $ .93 Minimum charge (per Quarter) 5.65 5.80 Overall the proposed rates are approximately 8/ more than the present rates. Supporting calculations for the proposed rates are in Exhibits F and G. It should be noted that the rate calculations result in 3M being charged 10% of the City's billing and sewer administrative costs and no charge for City maintenance costs as 3M performs all of their own maintenance within their headquarters complex. This rate calculation policy for 3M has been in effect since January 1, 1977. 1 The following is a comparison with other cities of quarterly sewer rates on an average single family home: The above comparison clearly indicates that the proposed rates for Maplewood in 1981 are reasonable. -3- 1980 1981 Rate Proposed Maplewood $ 17.30 $ 18.60 Roseville 25.10 27.60 Little Canada 11.00 White Bear 18.40 _15.00 18.40 North St, Paul 19080 - 21.80 Oakdale 18.80 18.80 . Woodbury 26.00 29.00 St. Paul 18.40 22.10 The above comparison clearly indicates that the proposed rates for Maplewood in 1981 are reasonable. -3- BILLING FREQUENCY :A review of the utility billing frequency was conducted to determine if the current practice of billing all accounts quarterly should be continued. The optimum billing frequency is determined by an analysis of direct billing costs, the bill amount, and the interest rate that can be earned on i nv tments . Basically, it is more effective to b i l l large accounts more often- than small accounts (In 1980, the largest account being billed is for the _aM Company which has annual sewer charge of $339,920 and a hydrant charge - of $33,550. The smallest account being b i l l e d is a non -resi de)ti al account which has an annual sewer charge of $22.60 and a hydrant charge of $10.00.) A study published by the Muni ci pal Finance Officers Association contained the following graph: EXHIBIT 2. BILLING CYCLE WITH LEAST COST DEPENDING ON ANNUAL DOLLAR SALES VOLUME AND COST PER BILL (Assuming a financing rate of 10 per cent) Variable Cost per Bill 1.00 .90 .80 .70 .60 .50 .40 .30 1D0 200 300 400 500 600 .700 800 900 1000 1100 Annual Dollar Sales Volume In order to use this graph, the (direct) variable cost per bill needs to be calculated. Maplewood's direct costs per bill are estimated to bq as follows: Postage $.150 Bill Forms .016 Envelopes .036 Data processing 9144 Clerical .054 Total .400 -4- ro b ro 4 �O ti 00� 1D0 200 300 400 500 600 .700 800 900 1000 1100 Annual Dollar Sales Volume In order to use this graph, the (direct) variable cost per bill needs to be calculated. Maplewood's direct costs per bill are estimated to bq as follows: Postage $.150 Bill Forms .016 Envelopes .036 Data processing 9144 Clerical .054 Total .400 -4- Using $.40 as the variable cost per bill , the graph indicates that $600 is the size of an annual b i l l where it becomes more cost effective to -bi 1 l monthly. The following calculations demonstrate this: Quarterly Monthl= Bill size ($600 /yr.) 150.00 $50.00 . Average receivable balance 75.00 25.00_ Lost investment interest (at 10% of the average balance) 7.50 2.50 Billing cost (at $.40 /bill) 1.60 4.80 Total annual cost $ 9.10 $ The above indicates that monthly billings will save X1.80 per year on a $600 annual bill. This savings increases as the bill becomes larger. For example, the savings on the 3M bill for 1980 would have been as follows: Quarterly Monthl Bill size $93,367.50 $31 Average receivable balance 46 15 Lost investment interest 4 1 Billing cost 1.60 4.80 Total annual cost $ 4 $ Based upon this analysis, it is recommended that accounts with utility billings totaling $600 or more per year be billed monthly rather than quarterly. The number of accounts involved in this change is only approximately 150 out of the 6,354 total and the extra billing costs will only be about $480. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the ordinance attached (Exhibit H) which provides for an increase in sewer rates and a change in billing frequency be approved for first reading. �! w �. � Vim. w...� rr. .• �..... - ..�..... .. . ! -5- Exhibit A SEWER FUND INCOME STATEMENT For The Years Ended December 31, 1975 thru 1979 1975 1976 1977 - 1978 1979 Operatinq revenues: . Setter billings $674,577 $686 $881 $9-08 $911 9 969 Mi scel l aneous 12 14,043 21 - 21 9 022 28.288 Total 686 700 903 932 940 Operating expenses: $ Sewage treatment 434 514 551, 589 637 ,139 Sewer maintenance 119 , 061 136 189 192,843 216 Administration and billing 93 105 125 117,270 132,381 Total 647 755 867 899 985,844 Net operating income (loss) before depreciation 39 (55,164) 35 32 (45,587) Other revenues (expenses): Miscellaneous non - operating revenues 26, 18, 22 17, 32 9 262 *Depreciation expense (12 (17 (1 ( .147, 9 400 ) ( 147 s l54 ) Net total 13 1 20 ( 129,889 ) ( 114,892 ) Net income (loss) $ 52 $ (53 s 989 ) $ 56 $ (97 5 626 1 ) $ *Effective with the year ended December 31, 1978, depreciation has been charged on contributed assets (e.g. sewer mains financed by special assessments) in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The replacement of contributed assets is expected to be financed by future special assessments rather than current sewer billing charges. �- Exhibit B SEWER FUND STATEMENT OF SOURCES AND APPLICATION OF CASH For The Years Ended December 31, 1975 thru 1979 1975 1976 1977 - 1978 1979 Sources of cash: Operating income (loss) before depreciation $ 39 $(55 $ 35 $ 32 $(45,587) Miscellaneous revenue 26,146 18 22 17 32,262 Decrease (increase) in net. receivables 45 15, 212 (18,093 (24,764 (58,024) 110 21,570 39 25 71 ,349 Applications of cash: Capital outlay 25 19 16 - 18 714 Transfer out to Special Assessment Fund- -Debt Service Accounts* - - - - 4 25,136 19 16 18,580 5,233 Net increase (decrease) in cash 85,637 (41,092) 23 6 (76,582) Cash Balance - January 1 1.99 ,859 285 244 268 274 , 626 Cash Balance - December 31 $ 285,496 $ 244,404 $ 268,196 $ . 274 9 626 $ 198, 3 044 *This transfer was to finance the cost of unassessed sewer improvements. �- Exhibit . C SEWER FUND PROJECTED INCOME STATEMENT For The Years Ending December 31, 1980 thru 1984 664,480 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 Operating revenues: 294 335 380 Sewer billings $1 $1,156,530 $1 $1,179,780 $1,191 Miscellaneous 13 13 , 270 13 3 1.270 13 13 Total 1,052 ,420 . 1 9 169 5 800 1 5 181 91 37 - 0 1 ,193 , 050 1 Operating expenses: Sewage treatment 664,480 829 930 1 9 044 9 190 1 ,171 ,590 Sewer maintenance 294 335 380 431 490 Administration and. billing 146,620 145 165 187 212 Total 1 9 ,015 5 615 1 ,310,230 1 1 1 9 874 9 540 Net operating income (loss) before depreciation (53,195) (140,430) (294,960) (474,480) (669,700) Other revenues (expenses): Miscellaneous non - operating revenues 28 28 28 28,490 28 Depreciation expenses (147- ( 147, 5 200 ) (147 (147 , 200) ( 147, 5 200. ) Net total ( 118,710 ) (118,710 ( 118,710 ) ( 118,710 } ( 118,710 ) Net income (loss) $ (171 9 905 ) $( 259,140 ) $( .413 9 670 ) $ (589,190 ) $ (788,410 ) Exhibit D SEWER FUND PROJECTED STATEMENT OF SOURCES AND APPLICATIONS OF CASH For The Years Ending December 31, 1980 thru 1984 Sources of cash: Operating income (loss) 'before depreciation Miscellaneous revenue Decrease (increase) in -. net receivables Application of cash: Capital outlay Transfer out to Special Assessment Fund- -Debt Service Accounts ** 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 $(53,195) $(140,430) $(294,960) $(470,480) $(669,700) 28,490 28 28 28 28 20 1 ,000 * 40 -0- -0- -0- �4 ( 71 ( 266 9 476 ' ) ( 441,990 ) ( 641 5 210 . ) 86 11 15 15 15 5 000 2 2 , 050 2 2 , 050 2 88 13 17 17 17 Net increase (decrease) in cash (93,155) (84,990) (283,520) (459,040) (658,260) Cash Balance (deficit) -. January 1 198 104 19 (263,621) (722 Cash Balance (deficit) - December 31 $ 104,889 $ 19 $ (263,621 ) $( 722,661 )$( 1,380,921 ) *These amounts represent the decrease in the amount due from the M.W.C.C. for credits due on final cost allocations for 1978 and 1979. * *These transfers are per Table 12 of the 1979 Annual Financial Report and are to amortize the cost of unassessed sewer improvements over the term of the bonds that were issued to finance the improvements. ' Exhibit E METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL, -00MMISSION 350 Metro Square: Buildina , St, Paul, . Minnesota 55101 222 -8423 GUIDELINES AND MODELS FOR USED CHARGE SYSTEMS The following are general guidelines to be used by each municipality in review- ing and adopting a system of user charges to meet the Environmental Protection Agency's regulation 40 CFR 35.905 --22 "User Charges and Industrial Cost Recovery" The general principle of an acceptable user charge system is expressed by the following: sewer cost equa is sewer rate ecuals . sev er revenue. There will be variances in user charge systems within each municipality due to differences in local costs and the types of sewer areas, (i) Revenue for the payment of charges from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Cost Allocation must be solely from charges to users of the sewer system within or served by each municipality, (A) No ad valorem taxes or other revenue sources can be used to pay any of the use costs allocate; to each municipality by the Commission; and (B) The allocation of reserve capacity costs based on the Service Availability Charge policies are not affected by tle user charge regulations , (2) Each user, or class of users, ser -.led by each municipality must pay a oroportionate share cf the costs allocated by the Commission based on their pr oporti.ona 1 use of the system. (3) User charges may be establ.is zed ra sea on a percentage of the charge for water usage only in cases vyhcre the water charge is based on constant cost per unit of consumption rate, (4) Quantity discounts to large volume users will not be acceptable, (5) The user charge system may include a minimum charge if the minimum charge can be substantiated as representing a minimum cost for providing the service to the individual user or class of users for which 'the minimum applies A maximum chaigTe Ls) not acceptable, (5) A flat charge for a class o* classes of users Is acceptable if it can be substiantiated that the flat charge results in the individual user or class of user paying his proportionate cost of the system, The revenue from the class for which the flett charge applies must be equal to that class of users pro port ion.a 'Le -use of the sewer system , rL�Jdc1 110s and Models for Us 1r Chai Sys Exhibit E Page Two The follow are several models which can be used a s guides in review user charge systems., MODEL I Thts model is the simplest form for the establishinent of a. user charge system. It is based on a constant cost per unit charge. City of Clearwater MWCC 1974 Cost Allocation Treatment Works 700 MGY $130"000 Service Area Cost 700 YLGY 5, 000 TOTAL GROSS CHARGES $175, 000 1974 Municipality Local Sewer Costs including Debt Service, Operation and Maintenance $ _ 25, r 000 TOTAL SEWER COSTS FOR MUNICIPALITY $200,000 $200, Total Sevier Costs — $285.71 per million gallons a year 700 million gallons per year or 28.57 cents per thousand gallons The charge was established by first determining the total sewer cost for the municipality tvhich included the costs allocated by the Commission and the costs of the local sewer system. Second, the costs are divided by the estimated gallons for the. year to determine the annual sewer rate. In this example, the cost was $285.71 per million gallons. The rate could be established in terms of a cost per thousand gallons by rounding .28 ,57 cents to 29 cents per thousand gallons A minimum charge could be set for the municipality based on the administrative cost for billing the user. MODEL II Model II is a system that could be established where a flat charge was needed for several classes of users within a municipality or a single class of users in the municipality, In this case, perhaps only part of the municipality was metered so that accurate flows could not be established for each user or class of users. The following are sample calculations that could be used to determine a flat charge, This could apply to establishing one or several flat charges for various classes of users within a municipality, ' t. Exhibit E G aldel inos and Models for Page Thrce i L nor Cliza-ge Systems City-of Clearwater MWCC 1974 Cost allocation: Treatment Worl�s Costs 700 MGY 130 , 000 - Service Area Costs 700 MGY 45 , 0 . 00 TOTAL GROSS CHARGES $ 175, 000 1974 Municipality Local Sewer Costs including Debt Service, Operation and Maintenance Cost $ 25 TOTAL SEVIER COSTS FOR MUNICIPALITI'Y $ 200,000 Residential Class Users: Amou $151 j , 2 00 48, 800 $200,000 ES i , ANNUAL FLOW UNITS UNjIT FLOW NSY 3,649 Single Family 100 gals, 364 120 Townhouses (each unit) 100"000 12, 60 Duplexes (each unit) 100,000 6.0 1,152 Apartments 80, 000 92, 491 Mobile Homes 80, 000 39 , 3 184 Public Housing 75, 000 13.8 - 10 Other 100, 1, Residential. Flow 529.2 Commercial & Industrial 170 . TOTAL 1974 ESTIMATE FLOW 7 00.0 Flow Breakdown: ' a. Residential 529, MGY 75 %0 b. Commercial & Industrial 1 7 0, 8 MGY 24 TOTAL ALLOCATION Determination of Residential Unit Charge: Residential Allocation $151..200 -'; 529.2 MGY . Unit Charge per 100, 000 gallons of $28.57 - y Amou $151 j , 2 00 48, 800 $200,000 ��u.;. - ,s a11d M odel s for User Ghnrc e Sy stems U Single Family Townhouse Duplex 1.0 1,0 1,0 Exhibit E Page Four ANNUAL UNIT CH ARGE 28.57 28.57 28.57 UNIT ANNUAL UNIT EQU CHARGE Apartment 6 8 22 Mobile Home * 8 2 2 , 85 Public Housing , 75 21, 45 Other 1, 0 28 57 Commercial & Industrial allocation $�8,800 170 MGY = Unit Charge per 100,000 gallons oT $28.57 or 28.57 cents per 1,000 gallons a In this case, the flat charge was established' by determining the estimated flow from the units in each one of the residential class users. This determination should be made individually for each municipality, 'he classes of users` sewer use will vary from municipality to municipality, An estimated flow for each one of those classes and the estimated resider_fial flows were totaled and amounted to 529.2 MGY and the commercial and industrial flows totaled 170.8 MG'., with the total for the municipality of 700 MGY, The residential flat charge at $28.57 per hundred thousand gallons is proportionate to the use of the system. This is also the case for the classes within residential class. The rate for the commercial and industrial also provides revenue proportionate to use, This particular model could be applied to a number of unique classes within residential for establishing a flat charge where metering was not available within a municipality, This could also be established for senior citizens or cthers for which a special class was created , The most important factor in determining this so that each one of these classes either within residential or any other class created paid their proportionate share of the cost of the system based on their proportionate flow contribution to the system, TC:ck 2 20.70 Exhibit F Supporting Calculations For Proposed Sewer Rates Sewer Billing Revenue Needed Amount to be billed customers per 1981 Budget Less M.W.C.C. current charges for 1981 to be allocated between users in proportion to flow City costs to be billed to customers Allocation of Costs (per Exhibit G flow data) : M. W. C. C. Current Charges: Flow Class A Non - Residential 42.8/ Class B Non - Residential 12.7/ Residential 44.5/ $1,156, 530 853 $ 303,17 2 Allocation 365,237 108,376 W7n " R r $ 853,358 City Total $ 303 Less 10/ of a d m i n . / b i l l i n g costs allocated to Class A Non - Residential - 14 288,620 Less Residential allocation (630.9/811 M. G . Y . x $288,620) - 224 Balance for Class B Non - Residential (180,1/811 M.G.Y. x $288,620) 64 Determination of Rates: Est. '81 Rate Per 1,000 Gallons: M.W.W.C. City Flow Costs Costs Total M.G.Y. Residential $379, $224 $ 604 649.8 Non - Residential Class A 365,237 14,552 379 625.2 Class B 108 64 172 185.5 Totals 853 303 1 1,460.5 Residential Quarterly Charges: Annual Annual Quarterly Flow Char e Charge Single family, townhouses, and duplexes (per unit 80 $74.40 $18.60 Apts., condominiums, and mobile homes 64 $59.60 $14.90 Senior citizen units 40,000 $37.20 $ 9.30 Minimum Charge - Non - Residential: $147,200 Fixed costs - estimated depreciation expense for 1981 6,354 Number of accounts billed =$ 23.20 per year minimum charge ($5.80 per quarter) Rate Per 1,000 Gals. $ .61 .93 Exhibit G Residential: Single family houses Townhouses Duplexes (per unit) Apts. & condominiums Mobile homes Senior citizen units "s Total Non-Residential: Class A Class B Total Grand Total Current Sewage Flow Data Est. Flow No. of F1 ow _ Percent of Per Unit Uni is MGY -- Total F1 ow 80 5 431.4 " 80 386 30.9 80 84 6.7 64 l,779 113.9 64 443 28.4 40,000 494 19.8 8 630.9 44.5/ 1 607.0 42.8/ 230 180.1 12.7/ 231 787.1 8 1 100.0/ *Total flow equals 93/ of the flow billed by M.W. C. C. for 1979. The remaining 7/ is assumed to be unmetered flow caused by infiltration of ground water. Exhibit H PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MAPLEWOOD CODE RELATING TO SEWER SERVICE CHARGES Section 1. Chapter 206.140 is hereby amended to read as follows: 206.141. RATES. The following rates and charges are hereby established for all sanitary sewer services furnished by and in the City of Maplewood: (1) The quarterly residential rates shall be: Single - Family Dwelling $18.60 Townhouse $18.60 Duplex $37.20 Apartment $14.90 Condominium $14.90 Mobile Home $14.90 Senior Citizen Unit $ 9.30 (2) Non - residential rates shall be as follows: THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: _ Class A - $.61 per 1 ,000 Class B - .$.93 per 1 ,000 Class A customers are defined sewer system lines on a site Class B customers are defined customers. gal 1 ons gallons as those that maintain private Df at least 200 acres.. as all other non - residential Non - residential sewer service charges shall be a minimum of $5.80 quarterly per sewer service connection. (3) The senior citizen rate shall be billed only to those that meet all of the following conditions: (a) Must be residential property occupied by no more than two persons; (b) One of the occupants must be the owner and billed directly by the City of Maplewood; (c) One of the occupants must be a least 65 years of age or older; (d) If occupied by two persons, the second occupant must be at least 62 years of age or older; (e) Annually after November lst and before December 15th, one of the occupants must file an affidavit with the City Clerk stating that all of the conditions required in this ordinance are applicable to his or her residence. In the case of rental property, the senior citizen shall submit proof that he or she is responsible for payment of the sewer service charge. , Affidavits accepted and approved by the City Clerk at a time other than that specified above, shall entitle the resident to the senior citizen rate for each full quarter remaining in the year not including the quarter during which the affidavit is filed. Exhibit H Page 2 (4) The rate for properties used jointly for residential and commer- cial purposes that are not metered separately shall be billed at non - residential rates. (5) In respect to property which shall be connected with the City sewer system for the discharge and disposal of other residential, commercial or industrial sewage waste, or any waste unusual in either character or amount, then in addition to all applicable charges hereunder, the City Council reserves the right to impose such supplemental sewage rate charge as said City Council shall determine as reasonable and warranted on the basis of all relevant factors. 206.142. FLOW CALCULATIONS. Annually during the month of December., the Director of Public Works shall determine, for each property billed at non - residential rates, the effluent discharged during the preceding year. This amount shall be used to calculate the sewer service charges for the current year. For the purpose of determining the quantity of effluent discharged from any property within the City of Maplewood, the Director of Public Works shall determine the lowest quarter of water usage during the preceding year, either through direct water meter readings, or if not metered, by reasonable estimating methods (i.e. special metering devices, comparison to similar types of land and water uses, etc.). The quantity of water used, as determined or estimated above, shall be the quantity of effluent discharged subject to the rate structure.. However, if determined by the Director of Public Works that the lowest quarter's water usage during the preceding year does not reflect a reasonable estimate of probable effluent to be discharged during the current. year, the Director of Public Works shall use any other equitable and reasonable method to estimate the probable effluent to be discharged in the following current year (i.e., special metering devices of effluent discharged, total yearly or estimated yearly usage, consumption minus estimated water usage not discharged into the sewer system, comparison with similar uses, etc.). All new properties connecting to sanitary sewer and applicable to the non-residential rate structure, as defined in this section, shall be ass i nged an estimated quantity of discharge, by any of the methods above which reasonably reflect such probable discharge. Such estimated quantity shall be subject to the rate structure, herein defined, until the end of that year at which time the Director of Public Works shall include such property into his study of applicable properties under this paragraph. 206.132. STATEMENTS. All accounts shall be billed quarterly except for those that have City utility billings totaling $600 or more per year in which case they shall be billed monthly. , Statements shall be mailed to "occupant" at the address of the property except Ja for: (a) Residents billed at the senior citizen rate; (b) Properties for which someone other than the occupant has requested to be billed. Exhibit H Page 3 Quarterly statements shall be due and payable to the City of Maplewood as follows: Quarter Endinq Payment Due Date Billing Billing District #1 District #2 Billing District #3 3 -31 6 -30 9 -30 12 -31 3 -31 6 -30 9 -30 12-31 1 -31 4 -30 a -31 10 -31 2 -28 5 -31 8 -31 11 -30 Monthly statements shall be due and payable to the City of Maplewood on the last day of the month they cover. 206.144 DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS. There shall be added to all statements not paid by the date indicated in Section 206.143 a delinquency charge of one dollar or ten percent of the amount due, whichever is greater. Annually by October 10th, the City Clerk shall deliver to the Council for adoption an assessment roll providing for collection of all delinquent amounts billed through the second quarter. Upon adoption by the Council , these accounts, including penalties and interest, shall be certified to the County Auditor for collection with taxes during the ensuing year. Such action may be optional or subsequent to taking legal action to collect delinquent accounts. 206.145. COMMENCEMENT OF SEWER SERVICE CHARGES. Sewer service charges shall commence on the date of application for an "Occupancy Permit" or "Final Plumbing Inspection", whichever shall be first. Failure to obtain either of these permits, as required in the City Code, shall be subject to the penalties of the code relevant to such permits, penalties of Chapter 206, and retroactive billing made from the date occupancy occurred as determined by the building official. 206.146. NON - USAGE. Adjustments in billing for any property for non -usage of the sewer service facilities may be granted by the City Clerk if proof is submitted by the applicant that water service had been terminated for a period of not less than 30 days. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force beginning January 1, 1981.