Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1980 09-18 City Council Packet
AGENDA Maplewood City Council 7:30 P.M., Thursday, September 18, 1980 Municipal Administration Building Meeting 80 - 24 (A) CALL TO ORDER (B) ROLL CALL (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes 80 -20 (August 7) 2. Minutes 80 -21 (August 21) (D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA (E) CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Aaenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and w i l l be enacted by one motion in the form listed bet ow. There will be no separate discussion on these items. If discussion i s de- sired, that item w i l l be removed from the Consent Agenda and w i l l be con- sidered separately. 10. Accounts Payable 29 Budget Change: Paramedics 3. Budget Transfer: Gladstone Park -44' Budget Transfer.: State Street Construction Aid 5. Budget Transfer: Reforestrati on Grant 6. Renewal of Contracts for Employee Insurance 7. State Fire Chiefs Annual Meeting: Duluth (Fire Marshal) 8, Budget Change: Revenue Sharing Audit (F) PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Zoning Amendment: R -1 to R -E (1st Reading) (7:30) 2. Rezoning: East of Arcade (R -1 to R -E) (1st Reading) (7:45) 3. Board of Adjustments and Appeals: a. Minutes b. Variance: Cope Avenue (Lenz) (8:00) 4. Variance: 1292 Kohlman (Wahlquist) (8:15) 5. Revenue Note: Gervais Associates; United Artists; Carlton Racquetball Club (8.-30) (G) AWARD OF BIDS 1. Employee Medical Insurance (H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Food Code: 2nd Reading 1. (I) VISITOR PRESENTATION i P J -Sy l . i (J) NEW BUSINESS 10 Tax Exempt Mortgage Revenue Note Financing r s � fi k R 4 s 20 Plan Approval Appeal: McDonald's j „ 3. Fees for Electrical Inspector 'tr ` 4 • Computerization of Police Record System V• rl t } 4- F4'4 ' S. Firm for Annual Audit r a tT 6. Implementation of 911 Telephone Service (K) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS i 1. S 2• ,z 3• 1A � 4 . f 5 f 6 _ • -. 7 8• 9• 10• (L) ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS (M) ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:30 P.M., Thursday, August 7, 1980 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 80 -20 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilman Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilman Present Frances L. Juker, Councilperson Present Earl L. Nelson, Councilman Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes 80 -16 July 3, 1980 Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Minutes of Meetin No. 80 -16 (July 3 1980) as Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes - all. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu mov t o ppTove the Agenda as amended: 1. Developers Agreement 2. S.U.P. for R -2 3. Maplewood Plan for White Bear Avenue 4. Highway 120 5. Letter from League 6. Lawsuits 7. Telphone Calls - Mayor Greavu stated a resident called him at 6:15 A.M. to tell him to get the crews out working. The resident hung up before the Mayor could answer him. The crews had started work prior to 6:00 A.M. Seconded by Councilperson Juker. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Item E -1 was removed to become Item J -3. Councilman Nelson moved, seconded by Mayor Greavu, Ayes - Four; Nay - Councilman Bastian to approve the Consent Agenda Items 2 thru 4 as recommended. 2. Hearing Date: Movies of Maplewood - Industrial Notes - 1 8/7 Resolution No. 80 -8 -200 RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF A NOTICE OF SAID HEARING WHEREAS, (a) Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, known as the Minnesota Municipal Indus- trial Development Act (the "Act ") gives municipalities the power to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of the encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to prevent so far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; (b) The City Council of the City of Maplewood (the "City ") has received from United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Maryland (the "Company ") a proposal that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter described, through the issuance of its industrial revenue bonds (which may be in the form of a single debt instrument) (the "Bonds ") pursuant to the Act; ( c ) Before proceeding with consideration of the request of the Company it is necessary for the City to hold a public hearing on the proposal pursuant to Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b, Minnesota Statutes; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. A Public Hearing on said proposal of the Company will be held at the time and place set forth in the Notice of Hearing hereto attached. 2 The g eneral nature of the proposal and an estimate of the principal amount of bonds to be issued to finance the proposal are described in the form of Notice of Hearing hereto attached. 3. The Notice of said Public Hearing shall be in substantially the form con- tained in the Notice hereto attached. 4 • PY A draft co of the proposed application to the Commissioner of Securities, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together with proposed forms of all attachments are exhibits thereto, is on file in the office of the City Clerk. City Y s, The Cit Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of said hearin g to be given one publication in the official newspaper and a newspaper of general circulation available in the City, not less than 15 days nor more than 30 days prior to the date fixed for said hearing, as shown in the notice of hear- ing hereto attached. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT To whom it may concern: 9 - Q/-7 Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, will meet at the City Hall in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota at 8:30 P.M. on September 18, 1980, to consider the proposal of United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc., that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter described by the issuance of industrial development revenue bonds. Acquisition of land between Southlawn Road, Beam Avenue and Ring Road in Maplewood and the construction thereon of a six screen movie theatre facility. The estimated principal amount of bonds or other obligations to be issued to finance this project is $2,525,000. Said notes or other obligations if and when issued will not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance upon any property of the City except the project and such bonds or obligations will not be a charge against the City's general credit or taxing powers but are payable from sums to be paid by United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc. pursuant to a revenue agreement. A .draft copy of the proposed application to the Commissioner of Securities, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, is available for public inspection beginning August 22, 1980, from 8:00 o A.M. to 5:00 o'clock P.M., Monday through Friday, at the City Hall. At the time and P lace fixed for said Public Hearing, the City Council of the City of Maplewood will give all persons who appear at the hearing an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal. Dated this 22nd day of August, 19800 (BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL) By /s/ Lucille Aurelius City Clerk 3. Hearing Date - Carlton Racquetball Club Resolution No. 80 -8 -201 RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF A NOTICE OF SAID HEARING WHEREAS, (a) Chapter 474, � Minnesota Statutes known as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (the "Act ") gives municipalities the power to issue revenue bonds for the ur ose of the encouragement and development of economically sound industry and P P commaerce to P revent so far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; - 3 - 8/7 (b) The City Council of the City of Maplewood (the "City ") has received from Otto Bonestroo, (the "Applicant ") an individual acting on behalf of a corporation which is to be formed and identified as the Carlton Racquet Club, a proposal that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter described, through the issuance of its industrial revenue bonds (which may be in the form of a single debt instrument) (the "Bonds ") pursuant to the Act; ( c ) Before proceeding with consideration of the request of the Applicant it is necessary for the City to hold a public hearing on the proposal pursuant to Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b, Minnesota Statutes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. A Public Hearing on said proposal of the Applicant will be held at the time and place set forth in the Notice of Hearing hereto attached. 2. The general nature ture of the proposal and an estimate of the principal amount of P bonds to be issued to finance the proposal are described in the form of Notice of Hearing hereto attached. 3. The Notice of said Public Hearing shall be in substantially the form contained in the Notice hereto attached. copy P 4. A draft co of the roposed application to the Commissioner of Securities, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together with proposed forms of all attachements and exhibits thereto, is on file in the office of the City Manager. 5. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of said hearin g to be given one publication in the official newspaper and a newspaper of general circulation available in the City, not less than 15 days nor more than 30 days prior to the date fixed for said hearing, as shown in the notice of hearing hereto attached. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT To whom it may concern: Notice i s hereb y g ' iven that the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, will meet at City Hall, 1380 Frost Avenue, in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota at 8:30 o'clock p.m. on September 18, 1980, to consider the proposal of Otto Bonestroo a n g individual actin on behalf of a corporation to be formed and identified as the Carlton Racquet Club that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter described by the issuance of industrial development revenue bonds. Construction of a 12 -Court Racquet Ball Club to be located on property at Fifth and Carlton Streets in Maplewood, Minnesota The estimated P rinicpal amount of bonds or other obligations to be issued to finance this project is $700,000o Said bonds or other obligations if and when issued will not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance upon any property of the City except the project and such bonds or obligations will not be a charge against the City's general credit or taxing powers but are P ayable from sums to be paid by the Carlton Racquet Club pursuant to a revenue agreement. S/7 proposed draft copy ro of the application to the Commissioner of Securities, State • approval of the project, together with all attachments and exhibits of Minnesota, for app thereto is available for public inspection beginning August 22 1980, from 8:00 o 1 clock a.m. to 5.00 o'clock P .m. , Monday through Friday, at 1380 Frost"Avenue, in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota. At the time and place fix ed for said Public Hearing, the City Council of the City of Maplewood d will give all persons who appear at the hearing an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal. Dated this 22nd day of August, 19800 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL) By /s/ Lucille E. Aurelius 4. Budget Transfer - Building Maintenance Division • budget transfer of $4 from Account number 101 - 115 -47 30 to Council authorized a b g account number 101 1 115 - $1,650 and to account No. 101 -115 -4020 - $2,900.00. 4 410 - $ .E-A 1. Appointment: Community Design Review Board _ 4 a. Mr. Victor Lydon • , 2616 Keller Parkway presented his reasons for wishing to be appointed PP nted to the Community Design Review Board. b. Mayor Greavu moved to appoint Mr. Victor Lydon to the Community Desi n Review Board effectively immediately until Januar a 19820 Seconded by Councilperson Juker. Ayes - all. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Special Use Permit: 2730 Hazelwood Health Resources - 7:30 P.M. • public hearing regarding the request of a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a pu g Health Resources , ervices Inc. for a special use permit to operate a community s program at 2730 Hazelwood Avenue. The Clerk noted the dates of publication and stated the hearing notice was in order. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. . following Planning Commission recommendation: C. , Chairman Les Axdahl presented the f o g . he Planning Commission recommend "Commissioner Whitcomb moved that t g to the City of the proposed Council approval of the speci ro o al use permit for the operation p P . Coun PP similar uses if approved by the City Council, with community service programs or 2 the following conditions: • e ear. It may be renewed 1. The permit shall be good for on if :Council y hborhood. determines that the.use has had no adverse on the neig 2. Striping of the parking lot for 52 spaces. • of the ball diamonds, provided 3. The City shall be allowed to continue use applicant. The it does not conflict with the use of the diamonds by the app harmless agreement obsolving Health Resources Inc. of City shall sign a hold har g _ 5 _ 8/7 any injury liabilities for City use -of the facilities. Commissioner Pellish seconded. Ayes all." d. Mr. Gerald McCarthy, President of Health Resources and Mr. Gary French, spoke on behalf of their proposal. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard: Mr. Ronald Erickson, 2669 Hazlewood Avenue g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Councilman Nelson inroduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 80 - 8 - 202 WHEREAS, a petition was filed with the City of Maplewood as provided under Section 915.010 of the Municipal Code of the City of Maplewood, said petition having been signed by more than 50% of the owners of property within 200 feet of the property described as follows: Unplatted Lands: Subject of Hazelwood Avenue the N 800 ft of S 1310 ft of W 578 ft of SE 1/4 of Section 3, Township 29, Range 22 which has been proposed for Special Use Permit. i WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on August 7, 1980, at 7:30 P.M. in the City Hall, notice thereof having been duly published in the official City newspaper, and notices of said hearing having been mailed to all property owners of record within 200 feet of the area proposed for special use permit to operate a Community Service Program; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission has made its recommendations; and WHEREAS, it appears for the best interest of the public that said petition be granted; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the petition for the above described Special Use Permit to operate a Com- munity Service programs at 2730 Hazelwood Avenue (formerly Hazelwood Elementary School) be granted, subject to the following conditions: 1. The permit shall be good for one year. It may be renewed if Council determines that the use had no adverse affect on the neighborhood. The concerns for parking spaces can be discussed at that time; 2. Striping of the parking lot for 52 spaces; 3. The City shall have a continued use of the ball diamond providing it does not conflict with the use of the applicant; -- 6 - R/7 4. The City shall sign a hold harmless agreement obsolving Health Resources, Inc. of any injury liabilities for City use of the facilities; 5. The applicant shall appear before the Council if an increase of the number of arkin stalls beyond the 52 spaces is needed within one year preceeding the P g renewal of their special use permit. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmen Anderson, Bastian and Nelson Nays - Councilperson Juker. 2. Kennel License - 1861 Kohlman Lane - 7:45 P.M. a. Manager Evans read a letter from the applicant, Timothy Morgan, 1861 Kohlman '' Avenue, requesting this item be withdrawn from the 3. Commercial Revenue Note: Beam Avenue Shopping Facility - 8:00 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Commercial Partners - Maplewood for Commercial Revenue Notes for acquisition and construction of a commercial shopping center on the south side of Beam Avenue west of White Bear Avenue. The Clerk noted the dates of publication and stated the hearing notice was in order.. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. C. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Fischer moved that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council give preliminary approval of the requested Commercial Revenue Note financin g on the basis that the project meets all of the criteria outlined by the City Council. Commissioner Kishel seconded. Ayes - all." d. Mr. Richard Riley, Vice President of Dougherty, Dawkins, Strand and Ekstrom, Inc. and Mr. Kerr, Construction Manager, spoke on behalf of the proposal. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu.closed the public hearing. h. Councilman Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 80 - 8 203 RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT BY COMMERCIAL PARTNERS- MAPLEWOOD UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT AND AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION TO THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES FOR APPROVAL THEREOF BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: ., _ Qi7 1. There has been presented to this Council a proposal by Commercial Maplewood, a Minnesota general partnership (the "Partnership ") Partners Map , that the City undertake a project pursuant to the Minnesota Municipal In- 3 dustrial Development Act (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474) for the acquisition, construction and equipping o f a commercial shopping center ( the "Project ") . _ Under t proposal, he the Project will be owned by the Partnership, and the Partnership will enter into a Loan Agreement with the City upon such terms and conditions as are necessary to produce income and revenues sufficient to 4 n due the principal of and interest on up to approximately $1,250,00 pay when P P Industrial Development Revenue Bonds of the City to be issued pursuant to said Cha ter 474 Minnesota Statutes, to provide monies for the acquisition, con- p struction and equipping of the Project and the City will pledge its interest and the Partnership will mortgage the l in the Loan Agreement to the bondholder, } • leases of the Project ect to secure the bond. Project and asst the lea J 2. A s required b said Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, this Council con - ducted a pub q Y g i. public hearing on August 7, 1980 on the proposal to undertake and f- nance the Project, after publication in the official newspaper and a newspaper of. general circulation in the City of a notice of the time and place of hearing, z stating atin the general nature of the Project and an estimate of the principal amoun of bonds or other obligations to be issued to finance the Project and stating of the proposed Application to the Commissioner of Securities, that a draft copy P together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, shall be available for ' on at the office of the City Clerk, in the City Hall, Maplewood, public inspects Minnesota, at all times between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and -5:00 p.m. each day Sundays and holidays to and including the day of hearing; except Saturdays, Y parties who eared at the public hearing were given an opportunity to and all p PP express their views with respect to the proposal. s y � 3. It i hereby found determined and declared that the purpose of the Project is and the effect thereof will be to promote the public welfare by the attraction encouragement and development of economically sound industry, ag- riculture and commerce so as to prevent, so far as possible, the emergence o blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; the retention and development ment of industry to use the available resources of the community, in order to • retain the benefit of their existing investment in educational and public service facilities b halting the movement of talented and educated personnel of mature a e to other areas and thus preserving the economic and g human resources needed as a base for providing governmental services and facil ses, the mor • e intensive development of land available in the area; and the it more intensive development of land available in the area to provide a more adequate tax base to finance the cost of governmental services in the City , County, and School District where the Project.is located. 4. The P a r tnership has entered into preliminary discussions with Dougherty, ar P Dawkins • , Strand & E , dstrom Inc. as Underwriter, and the Underwriter has reported that the Project and the sale of bond therefor are feasible. Pro ject is hereby g iven preliminary 5. The Prof Y approval by the City subject to g approval of the Project b the Commissioner of . Securi.ties and subject to final Y approval by this Council and b the purchasers of any bonds to be issued and as to the ultimate details of the Project. 6. In accordance wit Section 474.01 , Subd. 7, Minnesota Statutes, the Mayor, the City Clerk , and such other officers and representatives of the City as may from time to time b g e designated are hereby authorized and directed to submit the for the Pro•ect to the Commissioner of Securities and request her approval proposal o J thereof, and the Mayor, the City Clerk and other officers, employees and agents of the Cit y are hereby authorized to provide the Commissioner with such pre- liminary information as she may require. The Partnership, Messrs. Faegre & Benson as bond cousel, the Underwriter, the City Attorney, and other City officials are also authorized to initiate the preparation of a proposed loan agreement, lease agreement, mortgage and such other documents as may be nec- essar Y or appropriate to the Project so that, when and if the proposed Project is approved by the Commissioner and this Council gives its final approval thereto, the Project may be carried forward expeditiously. 7. The Partnership has agreed to pay any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the Project whether or not the Project is approved by the Commissioner and whether or not the Project is carried to completion. 8. The Partnership is hereby authorized to enter into such contracts, in its own name and not as agent for the City, as may be necessary for the construct- ion of the Project by any means available to it and in the manner it determines without advertisement for bids as may be required for the acquisition or con- s truc tion P of other municipal facilities, but the City shall not be liable on st any such contracts. Seconded by Mayot Greavu. Ayes - all. 4. Preliminary Plat /P.U.D. Goff's Mapleview Addition - 8:15 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a request by Mr..Pat Goff for a special use permit and land subdivision plat for property located at Lot 12 and W 1/2 of Lot 13, W.H. Howards Garden Lots, south of County Road C east of Duluth Street. The Clerk noted the dates of publication and stated the hearing notice was found to be in order. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Ellef.son moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the planned unit development for block one,subject to a building PP P permit being taken out for the first unit within two years of PUD approval. Council may renew the PUD if no substantial . changes have occurred that would have a negative impact on the project, the City, or the surrounding area. The Com- g P mission also recommends approval of the preliminary plat for block 1, with the option on of platting lots 1 - 3, block 1 in the first phase, subject to the follow - P g ing conditions: 1. The final plat shall not be approved, until: a A signed developer's agreement is submitted to the Director of Public W Y platting for an south of lots 1 - 3, block 1. The agreement shall include the dedication of a 12 foot wide trail easement and construction of a ten foot wide asphalt trail and 42 inch chain link fence on both s , ides between lots 15 and 16, block 1 and a six foot wide trail easement from the northern most corner of lot 16 to a point 81 feet south. The design of the trail is subject to the approval of the Director of Com- munity Services. -9- 8/7 n b. Approval of the final grading and drainage plans by the Director o public works, giving special attention to recommendations of the Soil Conservation Service. c. Council reordering the English Street project, except for lots 1 - 3, block 1. 2. The P roposed frontage road right -of -way and sewer easements shall be dedicated along with the first phase of development. 3. The land south of the drainage easement line shall be designated as an outlot and deeded to the City. Further, the* Commission recommends denial of the PUD and plat for block 2, on the basis that it is not consistent with the Land Use Plan or adjacent zoning. The Plannin g Commission requests the Council initiate a rezoning for proposed block 2 from R -1 to LBC, Limited Business Commercial. Commissioner Barrett seconded. Commissioner Pellish moved an amendment to condition 1. a. of the preliminary P � lat in lieu of the words "chain link fence ", insert "or such other suitable methods as the Director of Community Services approves ". Commissioner Whitcomb seconded. Voting on the motion as amended: Ayes - all. Ayes -9 Nays - 1 (Chairman Axdahl)" d. Mr. Pat Goff, the applicant, spoke on behalf of the proposal. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents and opponents. The following voiced their opinions and concerns: Ms. Louise Hanover; Mrs. Ted Leigh, 2591 Clarence Street; Mr. Jim Fenton, 1216 E. County Road C Mr. Geno Pitera, 1314 E. County Road C. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g Councilman Nelson introduced the followina resolution and moved its ado tion: 80 - 8 - 204 WHEREAS the Council of the City of Maplewo acting on its own initiative as rovided under Section 911.101 of the Municipal Code of the City of Maplewoo , P for the property described as follows Lot 12 and W 1/2 of Lot 13, W.H. Howards Garden Lots (South of County Road C. east of Duluth Street) which has been proposed for Special Use Permit. _ Q/7 WHEREAS a public hearing was held on August 7, 1980 at 8:00 P.M. in the City H � a 1 notice thereof having been duly published in the official City newspaper, er, and notices of said hearing having been mailed to all property owners P of record within 300 feet of the area proposed for Planned Unit Development to . construct 26 double dwellings (52 units); and WHEREAS the City Planning Commission has made its recommendations; and WHEREAS it appears for the best interest of the public that said Special Use Permit be granted; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, � that the petition for the above describe d Special Use Permit for Planned Unit Development to construct 26 double dwellings (52 units) be granted, subject to all conditions contained in the staff and Planning Commission reports. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. h. Councilman Nelson moved to approve the commencin of buildIR& on the first three lots adjac ent to County Road C and a roved the Goff's Ma leview Addition preluminaxy plat subject to the conditions presented in the staff report* - Y Seconded b Mayor Greavu. a Ayes - all. S Y G. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Winter Sand /Salt Blend a Manager Evans stated only one bid was received. Proper publication was accomplished and specifications were forwarded directly to four other suppliers. The City has conducted business with this firm in the past, and found both their products and service to be satisfactory. Award is recommended. b. Mayor Greavu introduced the followl*nF olution and moved its adoption: 80 - 8 - 205 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of J. y P L Shiel Co St. Paul, Minnesota, in the amount of $/6.60 per ton ($8.50 per to n delivered is the lowest responsible bid for the provision of )� winter sand /salt blend, and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authori zed and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. 2. Regular Gasoline, Lead Free and Diesel Fuel P a. Manager Evans stated s pecifications were mailed to seven oil companies. Two of these companies responded with letters indicating "No Bid% In light of the above, it is recommended that the Council extend the emergency g declaration under which purchases have been made for the past year. However, staff well attempt to secure bids thru the normal bidding process for each tanker load delivered: - 11 - 8/7 b. Councilman Anderson introduced the followin resolution an d moved its adoption: 80 -8 -206 EREAS it is advisable, expedient, and necessary that the City of Maplewood, WH � of motor Minnesota be provided with adequate supplies asoline and diesel fuel; g and WHEREAS because of uncertain market conditions and continued price fluctu- at ions the only response to bid advertisements, duly publicized and specified, was "No Bid "; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that emergency t the emer declaration for fuel purchases be and is hereby extended. y Seconded y ded b May Greavu. Ayes - all. S` H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. I. VISITOR PRESENTATION 1. Mr. Glenn Becklund, 2325 Linwood Avenue T a. Mr. Be c lund questioned when the proposed Dorland improvement is going to be k started. b. Staff stated they are waiting in for the developer to sign the necessary devel- o P ers agreement and to complete the conditions of that agreement. J. NEW BUSINESS Special Exception: 2555 Hazelwood Avenue Growing Room. 1. p P a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. • dahl resented the following Planning Commission report: b. Chairman Les Ax p "Commissioner Prew moved that the Planning Commission recommend to the City pp Council approval of the special exception for Growing Room to operate a day care center at 2555 Hazelwood for one year. If no nuisance condition exists at the end of one year, the permit may be renewed for five years, thereafter, renewal shall be subject to City, approval every five years. Approval is based on the following findings: 1 • proposal The is consistent with the intent the City Code. P 2. The proposal will not substantially change or detract from the use of the neighboring or subject property; 3. The prp pr oposal is in the best interests of the community and public welfare. Commissioner Barrett seconded. Ayes - all." _ 12 _ 8/7 Pp C. The applicants, Betty Felipse, 1610 Chambers Street and Betty Benjamin, 2367 Larpenteur Avenue, spoke on behalf of their proposal. Councilman Anderson moved to approve the special exception re uested hy Bett d. a da care center (in a Farm Residence Feli se and Betty Benjamin to operate at the Holy Redeemer Church 2555 Hazelwood Avenue sub'ect to the Dist rict ) staff and Planning Commission reco Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 2 Special Excep tion:Highway 61, South of County Road C - Hess Kline a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. Les Axdahl resented the following Planning Commission recomm b. Chairman presented " existing Commissioner Prew said since the e g zone is M -1, and the proposal is a less concentrated usage in the form of the Business Commercial, and since the site plan and access can b e worked out according to staff recommendations, he moved that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the special exception contingent upon: • 1. Council lifting the building uildin and water moritorium or water being extended to the site • and 2. The drive to Highway Hi hwa 61 shall be closed and access limited to the proposed front - age road at the owner's expense upon completion of the frontage road. Commissioner Barrett seconded. Ayes all." CIO Mr. Mark Parranto, architect, spoke on behalf of the development. d. Mr. Robert M.iggl er , P 2444 Ma lewood Drive, presented his opinions of the proposal and asked questions of the Council. e. Councilman Anderson moved to approve the s ecia1 exception to operate a Datsun dealership in an M-1, Li ht Manufacturing District as re uested b Mr. Hess Kline subject to the f o llowIR& con ditions: 1. Water being extended to the site; he osed 2 The drive to Highway 61 shall be closed and access limited to t p ro p frontage road at the owners expense upon completion of the frontage road. Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes - all. 3. Accounts Payable Counc ilper son Juker moved that the accounts (Part I - Fees Services Ex enses- Check No. 004491 thro u h Check No. 004561 - $127 645.45• Check No. 006304 throw h Check No. 006532 $ - $194,165,00: Part 11 Pa roll Check No. 25109 through Check No. 25037 $57 086.42 ) in the amount of $378 896.87 be paid as submitted. Seconded b y Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Developer's Association 13 - 8/7 k a. Councilman Anderson requested staff inquire of the Developer's Association if they are going to reactivate the regular meetings. 2. Special Use Permit for R -2 a. Councilman Anderson questioned what is going to happen with the moratorium on special use, permits for R -2 in an R -1 district. b. Councilman Anderson moved to refer the matter.to the Plannin& Commission for review. Seconded by Councilperson Juker. Ayes - all. 3. Henjy Special Use Permit a. Council Councilman Anderson questioned if special use permit for Hejny goes with the owner or the property. b. Staff stated the special use permit goes with the property. Mayor Greavu moved to extend the meeting past the 11:30 deadline Seconded by Councilperson Juker. 4. Maplewood Plan - White Bear Avenue Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilperson Juker, Councilmen Anderson and Nelson. Nays - Councilman'Bastian. a. Councilman A questioned uestioned how a residential area could be made an LBC district in the Comprehensive rehensive Plan. He feels something should be done with White Bear Avenue from Frost to Larpenteur Avenue. b. Councilman Anderson questioned ed how the Council can help Mrs. Clifford for her lot division and variance that Council had denied. He also stated the Land Use Plan for Whi te Bear Avenue should be changed to Residential Single Family. c . Councilman Anderson moved to refer the uestions raised hy him to the Plan nip g Commission for investigation. Seconded by Councilperson Juker. Ayes - all. S. Council Actions a. Councilman Anderson is concerned about some of Council actions. He feels as a Council we have to take stronger action. 6. Highway 120 a. Mayor Greav u stated he had received a letter from Ramsey County regarding Highway 120.. He feels Council should hold a hearing and get rid of that small (just north of I -94 on the east side of Highway 120). piece of property b Staff will contact 3M and see if they are interested. 14 - 8/7 7. Letter - League a. Mayor Greavu stated he received a letter from the League regarding the possibilities of their building a . new facility. b. Staff will present copies for the Council. 8 Beam Avenue a. Mayor Greavu asked the City Attorney if the City was going to appeal the recent Court decision regarding Beam Avenue. b. City Attorney Lais stated the 30 day appeal period has just started and Attorney John Bannigan will begin the appeal procedures. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS None. M. ADJOURNMENT 11:50 P.M. City Clerk J _ 15 _ 8/7 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:30 P.M., Thursday, August 21, 1980 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 80-21 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilman Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilman Present Frances L. Juker, Councilperson Present Earl L. Nelson, Councilman Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Meeting No. 80-17 (July 17, 1980) Councilman Anderson moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 80-17 (July 17, 1980) as submitted. Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all. 2. Meeting No. 80-18 (July 24, 1980) Councilman Nelson moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 80-18 (July 24, 1980) as sumbitted. Seconded by Councilperson Juker. Ayes - all. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. Newspaper Article 2. Garbage Ordinance 3. Alarm Ordinance 4. Contracts 5. Letters to LCMM 6. Appointment of Emergency Preparedness Director 7. Budget Information 8. H.R.A. Minutes 9. Final Approval - Mogren Brothers Commercial Revenue Note Seconded by Councilperson Juker. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Councilman Nelson moved, seconded by Councilman Anderson, Ayes -all, that the Consent Agenda, Items 1 through 5, be approved as recommended. 1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses, Check No. 004562 through Check No. 004621 - $71,221.53; Check No. 006533 through Check No. 006688 $122,417.55: Part II - Payroll - Check No. 25181 through Check No. 25322 - $56,607.28) in the amount of $250,246.36. 2. Acceptance of Election Judges Resolution No. 80-7-166 RESOLVED, that the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, accepts the following list of Election Judges for the 1980 Primary Election, Tuesday, September 9, 1980: Precinct No. 1 Precinct No. 7 Eleanor Mathews Margaret Wolszon Lorraine Schneider Myrtle Malm Maryls Hartman Betty Haas Mike Wasiluk Wyman Hageman Idamae Biebighauser Esther Dollerschel Patricia Blanck Armella Podgorski Agnes Allen Albert Raschke Precinct No. 2 Precinct No. 8 Pat Thompson Jean Myers Evelyn Axdahl Evelyn Tarara Kathleen Dittel Lorraine Fischer Bea Hendricks Rita Frederickson Florence Stella Mildred Houck Wilma Goertzen Edith Stottlemeyer Karen Burton Precinct No. 3 Precinct No. 9 Jeanne Schadt Ida Szczepanski, Barb Leiter Mary Johnson Doris Broady Peter Fischer Charlotte Wasiluk Bernadine Mortensen Janet Niska Mary Albrecht Alice Miller Dolores Mallet Delores Coleman Vickie Anderson Precinct No. 4 Precinct No. 10 Caroline Warner Anne Fosburgh Joyce Lipinski Mary Lou Lieder Marjory Tooley Dorothy Arbore Jeanne McNulty Lucille Cahanes Nancy Embertson Lorraine Tepe Judy Widholm Precinct No. 5 Precinct No. 11 Jeanne Hafner Delores Lofgren Emma Klebe Maxine Olson Sibbie Sandquist Arline Holst Phyllis Erickson Shirley Luttrell Lynette Leonard Janet Gabor Joyce Schmidt Joan Garvey Lorraine O'Connell - 2 - 8/21 Precinct No. 6 Kathy Supan Diane Bergeson Linda Ashfield Lois Eastman Janet Kampf Sandy Jones Linda Prigge Precinct No. 12 Mary Libhardt Audrey Duellman Deloris Fastner Mildred Dehen Virginia Glover Orpha Getty Georgia Schwandt 3. Temporary Gambling Permit - St. Jerome's Church Approved St. Jerome's Church application for a temporary gambling permit for Sept- ember 21, 1980. 4. Hearing Date - Underage Liquor Sale Establish a hearing date of September 4, 1980, 8:30 P.M. regarding forfeiture of bond of Party Time Liquors, 1730 Van Dyke Street, for underage sales. 5. Hearing Date: Commercial Revenue Note - Schreier - Highway 36 Resolution No. 80-8-167 WHEREAS, (a) Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, known as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (the "Act") gives municipalities the power to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of the encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to prevent so far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; (b) The City Council of the City of Maplewood (the "City") has received from Gervais Associates, a partnership consisting of Richard Schreier and others to be determined, a partnership organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the "Company") a proposal that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter de- scribed, through the issuance of its industrial revenue bonds (which may be in the form of a single debt instrument) (the "Bonds") pursuant to the Act; (c) Before proceeding with consideration of the request of the Company it is necessary for the City to hold a public hearing on the proposal pursuant to Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b, Minnesota Statutes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. A Public Hearing on said proposal of the Company will be held at the time and place set forth in the Notice of Hearing hereto attached. 2. The general nature of the proposal and an estimate of the principal amount of bonds to be issued to finance the proposal are described in the form of Notice of Hearing hereto attached. 3. The Notice of said Public Hearing shall be in substantially the form con- tained in the Notice hereto attached. 9 n1— 4. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Commissioner of Securities, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together with proposed forms of all,,,,, attachments and exhibits thereto, is on file in the office of the City Clerk. 5. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of said hearing to be given one publication in the official newspaper and a newspaper of general circulation available in the City, not less that 15 days nor more than 30 days prior to the date fixed for said hearing, as shown in the notice of hearing hereto attached. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this 21st day of August, 1980. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR AN INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, will meet at City Hall in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, at 8:30 p.m, on September 18, 1980, to consider the proposal of Gervais Associates, a partnership consisting of Richard Schreier and others to be determined, that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter described by the issuance of industrial development revenue bonds. Description of Project The acquisition of land and the construction of a storage warehouse on Gervais Avenue, approximately the 1800 block, in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota. The estimated principal amount of bonds or other obligations to be issued to finance this project is $900,000. Said bonds or other obligations if and when issued will not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance upon any property of the City except the project and such bonds or obligations will not be a charge against the City's general credit or taxing powers but are payable from sums to be paid by Gervais Associates pursuant to a revenue agree- ment. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Commissioner of Securities, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, is available for public inspection beginning August 22, 1980, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, at City Hall. At the time and place fixed for said Public Hearing, the City Council of the City of Maplewood will give all persons who appear at the hearing an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal. Mayor Greavu recessed the meeting at 7:33 P.M. to convene as the Maplewood Board of Appeals and Adjustments. Mayor Greavu reconvened the meeting at 7:41 P.M. - 4 - 8/21 G. AWARD OF BIDS 1. East Shore Drive - Frost Avenue Water Improvement Project 78-9 a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilman Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Larson Excavating, Inc., in the amount of $88,032.00 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of Frost Avenue and East Shore Drive (Improvement Project 78-9) (Phase II), and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all. 3. Tail Gate Spreaders a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilman Nelson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the net bid of Garwood Twin Cities Truck Equipment Company in the amount of $8,860.00 is the lowest responsible bid for the provision of four Tailgate Sanders (Meyers UTG-700 Spreaders w/cono-chem coating), and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby author- ized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) 2. Preliminary Plat - Gonzalez Addition - 7:45 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Mr. Rodolfo Gonzalez, 2626 Keller Parkway, to subdivide the property into 5 dwelling lots. The Clerk noted the dates of publication and stated the hearing notice was found to be in order. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report with the following recommendation: I. Approval of the Gonzales Addition preliminary plat, with the following con- ditions: 1. The Applicant shall dedicate a ponding easement to the City for a portion of the two acre foot holding pond, the location to be determined by the City Engineer. 2. Payment of deferred assessments of $1312.50 for sanitary sewer and $630.15 for, street improvements on County Road C. 3. An erosion control and grading plan shall be prepared with the advice of the Soil Conservation Service, and submitted for staff approval prior to final plat approval. - 5 - 8/21 II. Approval of variances of lot width for parcel one based on the finding that the variance is caused by the dedication of additional right-of-way which the County will be reducing in its proposed street plan. c. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendatio>z' "Commissioner Sletten moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the Gonzalez Addition preliminary plat, with the following conditions: 1. The holding pond to be as determined by the City Engineer. Lots 1 and 2 to be combined into one lot. 2. Payment of deferred assessments of $1312.50 for sanitary sewer and $630.15 for street improvements on County Road C. 3. An erosion control and grading plan shall be prepared with the advice of the Soil Conservation Service, and submitted for staff approval prior to final plat approval. Commissioner Howard seconded. Commissioner Fischer moved an amendment to strike the requirement for merging of lots 1 and 2 into one lot and leave them as two separate lots as originally submitted. Commissioner Pellish seconded. Ayes 8 Nays 2 (Commissioner Howard and Whitcomb) Voting on the motion as amended: Ayes 9 Nays 1 (Commissioner Howard)" d. Mr. Gonzalez, the applicant, explained his request. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. The following were heard: Mr. Philip Clyde. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Councilman Anderson moved to table this matter until November 6, 1980 for further investigation. Seconded by Councilperson Juker. Ayes - all. 3. Preliminary Plat: Schwichtenberg Addition - 8:00 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Schwichtenberg Properties to subdivide a 3.49 acre parcel of land located south of Linwood Avenue and east of VanDahl Addition into 13 lots. The Clerk noted the dates of publication and stated the hearing notice was found to be in order. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report with the following recommendation: Approval of the preliminary plat, on the basis that the plat would be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning and Subdivision regulations. - 6 - 8/21 Approval includes the following conditions: 1. The final plat shall not be approved until: a. Provision is made to extend sanitary sewer to the lots on Linwood Avenue b. Lot 13 shall be changed to "outlot A" c. A signed developers agreement is submitted to the Director of Public Works for his approval. The developers agreement shall include: 1) construction and easements for temporary cul-de-sacs at the end of Dorland and Dahl Roads 2) storm sewer easements along the east line of lots 11 and 12 and over the existing pond 3) final approval of grading, drainage, and utility plans 4) implementation of erosion control measures, as recommended by the Soil Conservation Service 5) extension of the Dorland Road sewer to serve lots 1 and 2 2. Payment of the cash connection charge for watermain service in Linwood Avenue (4200) 3. Removal of the barn and garages or redraw lots one and eight to get the barn and house on one lot. c. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Pellish moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat, on the basis that the plat would be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning and Subdivision regulations. Approval includes the following conditions: 1. The final plat shall not be approved until: a. The requirements for ordering the Hillwood Drive-Dorland Road Improvement project have been met. b. Lot 13 shall be changed to "outlot A". c. A signed developers agreement is submitted to the Director of Public Works for his approval. The developers agreement shall include: 1) construction and easements for temporary cul-de-sacs at the end of Dorland and Dahl Road 2) storm sewer easements along the east line of lots 11 and 12 and over the existing pond 3) final approval of grading, drainage, and utility plans 4) implementation of erosion control measures, as recommended by the Soil Conservation Service 5) extension of the Dorland Road sewer to serve lots 1 and 2 2. Payment of the cash connection charge for watermain service in Linwood Avenue (4200) - 7 - 8/21 3. Removal of the barn and garages or redraw lots one and eight to get the barn and house on one lot. Commissioner Ellefson seconded. Ayes all." d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Mayor Greavu moved to table until after the 8:15 P.M. hearing. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Council Rules of Procedures a. Councilman Bastian moved to amend the Maplewood Rules of Procedure, Section 1, as follows: "Curfew: No additional agenda item will be discussed after 10:30 P.M. No dis- cussion will continue past 11:30 P.M. Meetings adjourned under this policy will be continued to the next Thursday at 7:00 P.M. The continued meeting will start at the point on the agenda where adjournment occured. No new items will be added to the continued meeting agenda." Seconded by Councilperson Joker. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) Ayes - Councilmen Anderson and Bastian.! Nays - Mayor Greavu, Councilperson Juker and Councilman Nelson. 3. Preliminary Plat: Schwichtenberg Addition - 8:00 P.M. h. Mr. Kurt Schwichtenberg spoke on behalf of the request. i. Councilman Anderson moved to approve the Schwichtenberg ProDerties for the 3.49 acres the 1. The final plat shall not be approved until: a. Provision is made to extend sanitary sewer to the lots on Linwood Avenue b. Lot 13 shall be changed to "outlot A" c. A signed developers agreement is submitted to the Director of Public Works for his approval. The developers agreement shall include: 1) construction and easements for temproary cul-de-sacs at the end of Dorland and Dahl Roads 2) storm sewer easements along the east line of lots 11 and 12 and over the existing pond 3) final approval of grading, drainage, and utility plans 4) implementation of erosin control measures, as recommended by the - 8 - 8/21 Soil Conservation Service 5) extension of the Dorland Road sewer to serve lots 1 and 2. 2. Payment of the cash connection charge for watermain service in Lin- wood Avenue ($4200) 3. Removal of the barn and garages or redraw lots one and eight to get the barn and house on one lot. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 4. English Street - South of County Road C - 8:15 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the rehear- ing of the proposed improvement of English Street, south of County Road C by construction of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, street and appurtenant work. The Clerk noted the dates of publication and stated the hearing notice was in order. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. d. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. f. Councilman Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: ffilemmillowl WHEREAS, after due notice of public hearing on the construction of sanitary sewers and service connections, watermains and service connections, storm sewers, streets, and all necessary appurtenances on English Street from County Road "C" southerly a distance of approximately 730 feet and sanitary sewer mains and all necessary appurtenances from English Street westerly to Duluth Street, a hearing on said improvement in accordance with the notice duly given was duly held on August 21, 1980, and the Council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That it is advisable, expedient, and necessary that the City of Maplewood construct sanitary sewers and service connections, watermains and service connections, storm sewers, streets and all necessary appurtenances on English Street from County Road "C", southerly a distance of approximately 730 feet and sanitary sewer mains and all necessary appurtenances from English Street westerly to Duluth Street as described in the notice of hearing thereon, and orders the same to be made. 2. The City Engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement. 3. This improvement is hereby designated to be Maplewood Project No. 79-4. Seconded by,Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all. - 9 - 8/21 G. AWARD OF BIDS (continued) 2. English Street, South of County Road C - Project 79-4 a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilman Nelson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 80-8-171 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Richard Knutson, Inc., in the amount of $102,795.45 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of English Street South of County Road "C" (Improvement 79-4), and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Seconded by Councilperson Juker. Ayes - all. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (continued) 2. Building Project for League of Minnesota Cities a. Manager Evans presented a letter from the League of Minnesota Cities re- garding their request for funds to build a building to house their facilities. b. Councilman Bastian esota Cities expressin interest in the Citv o Seconded by Councilperson Juker. forward a letter to constructing a buil Ayes - Councilperson Juker, Councilmen Anderson, Bastian and Nelson. Nays - Mayor Greavu. 3. Brookview Drive Storm Sewer - Project 78-20 a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mr. Dan Lofgren, 2656 Brookview Drive and Mr. Warren Wallgren, Brookview Drive, area residents, expressed their concerns with the proposed project. c. Councilman Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 80-8-172 WHEREAS, after due notice of public hearing on the construction of storm sewer, street regrading, drainage facilities and necessary appurtenances on the Brookview Drive Storm Sewer (Improvement Project 78-20) a hearing on said im- provement in accordance with the notice duly given was duly held on July 17, 1980, and the Council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: - 10 - 8/21 1. That it is advisable, expedient, and necessary that the City of Maplewood construct storm sewer, street regrading, drainage facilities and necessary street regrading; drainage facilities and necessary appurtenances on the Brookview Drive Storm Sewer (Improvement Project 78-20) as described in the notice of hearing thereon, and orders the same to be made. 2. The City Engineer is hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement. 3. This improvement is hereby designated to be Maplewood Project No. 78-20. Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all. 4. Review Assessment Hearing Comments a. Manager Evans presented the requests of cancellation adjustment or continued deferment of the assessments to be levied at this time. b. Council reviewed the following requests: 1. Sanitary Sewer No. 1 a. Mrs. Lorraine Odden, 2305 Barclay Street - $487.90 Code No. 57 01010 060 55 - No change in assessment 2. Sanitary Sewer No. 2 a. Adolph and Mildred Palme, 1721 Arcade Street $1,172.00 - Code No. 57 51100 060 01 - No change in assessment b. Lutheran Church of Peace - 47 So. Century Avenue - $1,020.00 Code No. 57 00100 080 75 - No change in assessment c. Esther Rylander and Robert J. Kassee - 2126 Arcade Street - $437.19 Code No. 57 01610 010 36 - No change in assessment d. Edward Masloski - 1915 Desoto - $1,263.14 Code No. 57 01710 076 57 - No change in assessment e. Evelyn McMillin - 1777 Edgerton - $2,843.75 Code No. 57 41500 080 02 - No change in assessment f. Valentine Knabe, 1760 Desoto Street - $1,679.60 Code No. 57 41500 200 05 - No change in assessment g. David and Margaret Anderson, 1993 Arkwright St. - $517.92 Code No. 57 48800 131 03 - No change in assessment h. Herbert Toenjes, 1966 McMenemy Street - $1,810.90 Code No. 57 48800 301 05 - No change in assessment i. Hartford Langer, 2074 Edgerton - $650.00 Code No. 57 75500 140 00 - No change in assessment j. .St. Paul Board of Water Commissioners - Code No. 57 25500 300 06, 57 67500 192 10; 57 25500 100 05; 57 25500 180 05; 57 25500 190 05; 57 25500 200 05 - No change in assessments. - 11 - 8/21 Code No. 57 01810 010 50 - $3,521.90 Councilman Anderson moved to cancel the assessment of $3,521.90 - San- itary Sewer No. 5-2 against the St. Paul Water Department (the agreement', siened by the St. Paul Water Department and the City states the City shal Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes - all. 3. Sanitary Sewer No. 5-4 a. Bernard Mehr, 687 Ferndale Street - $480.00 Code No. 57 50700 060 01 - no change in assessment b. Donald Kimble, 679 Ferndale Street - $480.00 Code No. 57 50700 070 01 - no change in assessment 4. Sanitary Sewer No. 6-2 a. Ethel and Donald Neumann, 1795 E. County Road C - $2,492.00 Code No. 57 00210 030 54 - no change in assessment b. Ronadl Leu - $1,247.40 Code No. 57 00310 130 80 - no change in assessment c. Herbert Schouweller - $2,625.00 Code No. 57 00310 200 82 - no change in assessment 5. Water Improvement 3 a. Adolph Palme, 1721 Arcade Street - $1,172.10 Code No. 57 51100 060 01 - no change in assessment 6. Water Improvement 4 a. Herbert Toenjes, 1966 McMenemy Street $ 1,898.46; $1,476.58 Code Nos. 57 48800 271 04 and 57 48800 301 05 - no change in assessment b. Erwin Nordeen, 2290 White Bear Avenue - $1,596.00 Code No. 57 22000 274 09 - no change in assessment 7. Water Improvement 5 a. Esther Rylander and Robert Kasse, $437.26 Code No. 57 01610 010 36 - no change in assessment 8. Sanitary Sewer No. 8 a. Mr. John Daubney, attorney representing Mr. and Mrs. Rueben Ristrom, 1633 Lark Avenue, requested continued deferment. No change in assessment. 9. Sanitary Sewer No. 7 a. George Rossbach, 1406 E. County Road C, $1,000.00 Code No. 57 01010 020 36 - no change in assessment 10. Sanitary Sewer No. 68-2 - 12 - 8/21 a. W.E. Leonard, $4,972.18 Code No. 57 01300 020 34 - no change in assessment 11. County Road "C" a. William Howard, 931 E. County Road C - $540.00 No change in assessment. b. Ray Nowicki, $15,750.00 Code No. 57 00910 040 37 - no change in assessment 12. Cope Avenue Utilites and Street a. Warren D. Madigan - Code No. 57 63100 030 10 Street - $13,395.53 - Utilities - $13,027.68 Councilman Anderson moved to cancel the Street - $13.395.53. Utilities. 813.027 as e Avenue'Assessments of Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes - all. b. John Kavanagh, 57 68800 012 08 Street - $12,321.49, Utilities - $15,362.65 - no change in assessment c. Mr. Kavanagh stated he had applied for assessment consideration on the Meister property. Mayor Greavu moved to discuss Mr. Kavanaugh's request on the August 28 1980 meeting. Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmen Bastian and Nelson. Nays - Councilperson Juker, Councilman Anderson. d. James Refrigeration - Code No. 57 63100 050 59 Streets - $10,448.08, Utilities - $4,456.71. Councilman Anderson moved to cancel a total of assessments against Code No. 57 63100 050 59. 200.00 from the total Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes - all. e. Rueben Ristrom, 1633 Lark Avenue Code No. 57 68800 012 07 - Streets $13,505.86; Utilities - $15,107.53. No change in assessments. 13. Water Improvement 24 a. Hartford Langer, 2074 Edgerton, $871.00 Code No. 57 75500 140 00 - no change in assessment. 14. Sanitary Sewer lA a. Donna Freking, 962 Bartelmy Lane - $1,297.16 - 13 - 8/21 Code No. 57 14550 010 01 Councilman Anderson moved to cancel $642.66 of the assessment against property Code No. 57 14550 010 01. Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes - all. 15. Water Improvement 70-28 a. Rose Westbrook, 1900 Furness, $1,304.01. Code No. 57 32800 160 04 - no change in assessment. 16. Water Improvement 73-1 a. Walter Corky, $4,465.00 Code No. 57 00410 010 82 - no change in assessment. b. Joseph Zappa, 2522 Flandrau Street - $2,285.42 Code No. 57 01010 080 01 Councilman Anderson moved to cance in the amount of $2,285.42 against as Water Improvement 73-1 assessa Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes - all. c. Vernon Blanski, 1700 E. County Road C - $335.00 Code No. 57 01010 300 01 - no change in assessment d. Raymond Kaeder, $2,687.65 Code No. 57 01010 170 36 - no change in assessment e. Willa Stack, 2707 Hazelwood Street - $2,570.00 Code No. 57 29600 050 00 - no change in assessment f. William J. Gardner, 2480 Hazelwood Street - $3,745.73 Code No. 57 63100 190 06 - no change in assessment g. John T. Oswald, 1694 Demont Avenue - $335.00 Code No. 57 63100 040 04 - no change in assessment h. St. Paul Priory, $12,685.00 Code No. 57 03800 140 01 - no change in assessment i. Ronald Leu, Code No. 57 00310 130 80 - $335.00 Councilman Bastian moved to cancel $335.00 for Water Improvement 73-1 assessment against property Code No. 57 00310 130 80. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. 17. Diseased Trees 79-6 Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmen Anderson, Bastian & Nelson. Nays - Councilperson Juker. a. Ralph J. Pierre, 1715 No. Howard Street - $148.38 Code No. 57 32800 080 03 - no change in assessment. - 14 - 8/21 b. Gene D. Sbragia, 1456 E. Sandhurst Drive - $115.27 Code No. 57 67900 060 15 - no change in assessment. I. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. Mr. George Rossbach, 1406 E. County Road C a. Mr. Rossbach, 1406 E. County Road C, requested information as to why he was told there was a moratorium on construction of duplexes and then later read that Council had approved construction of 26 duplexes just west of his property. b. Manager Evans stated there was placed a moratorium on having a Special Use Permit to build a duplex in an R-1 zoned property. J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Special Exception Renewal - 1887 Myrtle a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Pellish moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the renewal of the home occupation for a five year period, since the applicant's business has not caused any complaints. Commissioner Fischer seconded. c. Councilman Anderson to overate a Seconded by Councilperson Juker. 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Letter Ayes - all." of the home o Ayes - all. tion a. Manager Evans presented comments and recommendations concerning the Metro- politan Council proposed guidelines for review of amendments to local comprehensive plans. b. Mayor Greavu moved to forward a letter to the Metro Council expressing the Manager's comments. Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes - all. 3. Cooperative Agreement - Suburban Rate Authority Board a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilman Nelson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 80-8-173 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood, Minnesota has entered into a Joint and Cooperative Agreement providing for the creation of the Suburban Rate Authority; and WHEREAS, the present form of such Joint and Cooperative Agreement does not authorize the Suburban Rate Authority to participate in proceedings or engage - in activities involving the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Suburban Rate Authority has recommends that such organization be authorized to participate in proceedings or engage in activities involving the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission; and WHEREAS, it appears necessary and desirable that such authority be conferred upon the Suburban Rate Authority and that this be accomplished by the execution of the amendment to the Joint and Cooperative Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota as follows: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are authorized and directed to execute the Amendment to the Joint and Cooperative Agreement giving authority for'Suburban Rate Author- ity involvement in matters relating to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. 2. The City Clerk is directed to file a copy of the executed Amendment to the Joint and Cooperative Agreement, together with a certified copy of this resolution, with the Secretary/Treasurer of the Suburban Rate Authority. Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all. 4. Special Exception to Operate a Came Room - 2251 E. Larpenteur Avenue a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Barrett moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council denial of this special exception application based on the fact that it is not consistent with the neighborhood convenience shopping center and no need for such activity has been demonstrated to the Commission. The Commission also expressed concern on parking as to its compatibility with the neighborhood center. Commissioner Howard seconded. Ayes all." c. Mr. Tom Bicha, the applicant, spoke on behalf of his request to operate a game room. d. Mr. Fred Ludtke, operator of such game room, spoke on behalf of the proposal. e. Mr. Richard Ernst, owner of the building, spoke on behalf of the proposal. f. The following area residents spoke in opposition to the proposal: Mr. Casimer Willard, 2225 E. Larpenteur Avenue; Andy Anderson, 2243 E. Larpenteur Avenue; Several area residents stated they were also opposed. g. Councilman Anderson moved to deny the request for a special exceptio a game room facility at 2251 E. Larpenteur based on the Planning Commiss recommendations and also because of the added hazards to the area due to rraffir_ - 16 - 8/21 Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all. Mayor Greavu moved to extend the meeting past the 11:30 P.M. deadline. Seconded by Councilperson Juker. Ayes - Mayor Greavu; Councilperson Juker,. Councilmen Anderson and Nelson. Nays - Councilman Bastian. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Newspaper Article a. Councilperson Juker stated the Council Agenda was not on the front page and was not printed in full in the Maplewood Review. It should be placed on the front page. b. Council requested the reporter ask that Agenda be on the front page of the Maplewood Review. 2. Garbage Collection Ordinance a. Councilman Bastian questioned if trash haulers are allowed to pick up trash at night in commercial areas. b. Staff stated the trash haulers are not governed by hours of pickup, but are not allowed to create disturbances or any undue noise between the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M. 3. Alarm Ordinance a. Councilman Bastian asked if there was any way that our alarm ordinance could be worded that if an alarm goes longer than one hour that person or business could be assessed. b. Staff stated that provision could be worked into the ordinance. c. No action taken. 4. Contracts a. Councilman Bastian questioned what the cost of the AFSCME proposal would be. b. Manager Evans stated he had not worked up a cost proposal as it was the Union's first proposal. 5. Letters - LMC Not discussed. 6. Appointment - Emergency Preparedness Director a. Mayor Greavu moved to appoint Larry Cude as Director of effective immediatelv at $500 Der month Plus use of a vehic b. Mayor Greavu appointed Larry Cude as Director of Emergency Preparedness effective immediately. c. Salary for the Director is tabled until Council reviews the budget. 8. H.R.A. a. Mayor Greavu questioned items in the H.R.A. minutes regarding using case numbers not names for applicants of the housing grants. b. Case numbers were suggested to comply with the Data Privacy Act. Councilman Anderson moved to waive the Rules of Procedures and extend the Agenda past the 12:00 P.M. Midnight deadline. Seconded by Councilperson Juker. Ayes - Mayor Greavu; Councilperson Juker, Councilmen Anderson and Nelson. Nays - Councilman Bastian. 7. Budget Information a. Mayor Greavu requested to have a list of each department head and who is working in that department, their salaries, plus what income each department takes in. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Final Approval - Mogren Brothers - Commercial Revenue Note a. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 80-8-174 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: ARTICLE ONE DEFINITIONS, LEGAL AUTHORIZATION AND FINDINGS 1-1. Definitions. The terms used herein, unless the context hereof shall require otherwise shall have the following meanings, and any other terms defined in the Loan Agree- ment shall have the same meanings when used herein as assigned to them in the Loan Agreement unless the context or use thereof indicates another or different meaning or intent. Act: the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, as amended; Assignment of Leases and Rents: the agreement to be executed by the Borrower assigning all the rents, issues and profits derived from the Project to the Lendl to secure the repayment of the Note and interest thereon; Assignment of the Loan Agreement: the agreement to be executed by the City and the Lender assigning the Loan Agreement to the Lender; Bond Counsel: the firm of Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, of - 18 - 8/21 St. Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota, and any opinion of Bond Counsel shall be a written opinion signed by such Counsel; Borrower: Mogren Bros., a Minnesota general partnership, its successors, assigns, and any surviving, resulting or transferee business entity which may assume its obligations under the Loan Agreement; City: The City of Maplewood, Minnesota, its successors and assigns; Disbursing Agreement: the agreement to be executed by the City, the Borrower and the Lender, relating to the disbursement and payment of Project Costs; Guaranty: the personal guaranty to be executed by Robert C. Mogren and Gerald C. Mogren, in favor of the Lender; Improvements: the structures and other improvements, including any tangible personal property, to be constructed or installed by the Borrower on the Land in accordance with the Plans and Specifications; Land: the real property and any other easements and rights described in Exhibit A attached to the Loan Agreement; Lender: First State Bank of White Bear Lake, in White Bear Lake, Minnesota, its successors and assigns; Loan Agreement: the agreement to be executed by the City and the Borrower, providing for the issuance of the Note and the loan of the proceeds thereof to -the Borrower, including any amendments or supplements thereto made in accordance with its provisions; Mortgage: the Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Financing Statement to be executed by the Borrower as mortgagor, to the Lender, as mortgagee, securing payment of the Note and interest thereon; Note: the $560,000 Commercial Development Revenue Note of 1980 (Mogren Bros. Project), to be issued by the City pursuant to this Resolution and the Loan Agreement; Note Register: the records kept by the City Clerk to provide for the registration of transfer of ownership of the Note; Plans and Specifications: the plans and specifications for the construction and installation of the Improvements on the Land; Principal Balance: so much of the principal sum -on the Note as remains unpaid at any time; Project: the Land and Improvements as they may at any time exist; - 19 - 8/21 Project Costs: the total of all "Construction Costs" and "Loan and Carrying Charges," as those terms are defined in the Loan Agreement; Resolution: this Resolution of the City adopted-- , 1980, together with any supplement or amendment thereto. All references in this instrument to designated "Articles," "Sections" and other subdivisions are to the designated Articles, Sections and subdivisions of this instrument as originally executed. The words "herein," "hereof" and "hereunder" and other words of similar import refer to this Resolution as a whole not to any particular Article, Section or subdivision. 1-2. Legal Authorization. The City is a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota and is authorized under the Act to initiate the revenue producing project herein referred to, and to issue and sell the Note for the purpose, in the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Act and in this Resolution. 1-3. Findings. The City Council has heretofore determined, and does hereby determine, as follows: (1) The City is authorized by the Act to enter into a Loan Agreement for the public purposes expressed in the Act; (2) The City has made the necessary arrangements with the Borrower for the establishment within the City of a Project consisting of certain property all as more fully described in the Loan Agreement and which will be of the character and accomplish the purposes provided by the Act, and the City has by this Resolution authorized the Project and execution of the Loan Agreement, the Assignment of Loan Agreement, the Note and the Disbursing Agreement, which documents specify the terms and conditions of the acquisition and financing of the Improvements to be included in the Project; (3) in authorizing the Project the City's purpose is, and id its judgment the effect thereof will be, to promote the public welfare by: the attraction, encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce so as to prevent, so far as possible, the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; the develop- ment of revenue -producing enterprises to use the available - 20 - 8/21 resources of the community, in order to retain the benefit of the community's existing investment in educational and public service facilities; the halting of the movement of talented, educated personnel of all ages to other areas thus preserving the economic and human resources needed as a base for providing governmental services and facilities; the provision of acces- sible employment opportunities for residents in the area; the expansion of an adequate tax base to finance the increase in the amount and cost of governmental services, including educational services for the school district serving the community.in which the Project is situated; (4) the amount estimated to be necessary to finance the Project Costs, including the costs and estimated costs _permitted by Section 474.05 of the Act, will require the issuance of the Note in the principal amount of $560,000 as hereinafter provided; (5) it is desirable, feasible and consistent with the objects and purposes of the Act to issue the Note, for the purpose of financing the Improvements to be included in the Project; (6) the Note and the interest accruing thereon do not constitute an indebtedness of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation and do not constitute or give rise to a pecuniary liability or a charge ..against the general credit or taxing powers of the City and neither the full faith and credit nor the taxing powers of the City is pledged for the payment of.the Note or interest -_ thereon; and . (7) The Note is an industrial development bond within the meaning of Section 103(b) of the Internal Revenue Code and is to be issued within the exemption provided under subparagraph (A) of Section 103(b)(6) of the Code with respect to an issue of $1,000,000 or less; provided that nothing herein shall prevent the City from hereafter qualifying the Note under a different exemption if, and to the extent, such exemption is permitted by law and consistent with the objects and purposes of the Project. 1-4. Authorization and Ratification of Project. The City has heretofore and does hereby authorize the Borrower, in accordance with the provisions of Section 414.03(7) of the Act and subject to the terms and conditions s-et forth in the Disbursing Agreement, to provide for the construction and installation of the Improvements to be included in the Project pursuant to the Plans and Speci- fications by such means as shall be available to the Borrower and in the manner determined by the Borrower, and without advertisement for bids as may be required for the construction and acquisition of municipal facilities; and the City hereby ratifies, affirms, and approves all actions heretofore taken by the Borrower consistent with and in anticipation of such authority and in compliance with the Plans and Specifications. - 21 - 8121 ARTICLE TWO NOTE 2-1. Authorized Amount and Form of Note. The Note issued pursuant to this Resolution shall be in substantially the form set forth herein, with such :appropriate variations, omissions and insertions as -are -permitted or required by this Resolution, and in accordance with the further provisions hereof; and the total principal -amount of .the Note that may be outstanding hereunder is expressly limited to $560,000 unless a duplicate Note is issued pursuant to Section 2-6. The Note shall be in substantially the following form: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Commercial Development Revenue Note of 1980 (Mogren Bros. Project) $56.0,000 FOR VALUE RECEIVED the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, Ramsey i County, Minnesota, (the "City") her promises to pay First. State Bank of White Bear Lake, White Bear Lake, Minnesota (the "Lender"), its successors or registered assigns, from the source and in the manner hereinafter provided, the principal sum of FIVE HUNDRED SIXTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($560,000), or so 'i much thereof as.remains unpaid from time to time (the "Principal Balance"), with interest thereon at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum or at such higher. rate as hereinafter. ;i provided, in any coin or currency which at the time or times of payment is legal tender for the payment of.public or private debts in the United States of America, in accordance with.th@ terms hereinafter set forth. - 1. (a) The Principal Balance shall be -amortized and paid in 179 equal consecutive monthly installments of $5,088.72 each commencing on October i, 1980 and continuing.on the first. day of each and every month thereafter until the 15th anniversary hereof, at which time the entire Principal Balance and accrued interest shall be due and payable in full (the "Final Maturity Date:). Payments shall be -applied first to interest due on the Principal Balance and thereafter to Balance. f the Principal a o reduction - 22 - 8/21 (b) If the interest on this Note should become subject to federal income taxation pursuant to a "Determination of Taxability" as that term is defined in Section 4.07 of the Loan Agreement hereinafter referred to, and the Lender delivers to the Borrower a copy of the notice of the "Determination of Taxability", the interest rate shall be immediately increased to eighteen and one-half percent (18 1/2%) per annum and each monthly installment thereafter payable shall be.aCcordingly adjusted and shall be equal to the amount necessary to amortize the remaining Principal Balance on the basis of a 25 year amor- tization schedule with a balloon payment on the Final Maturity Date with interest at said increased rate; and in addition the Lender shall be entitled to receive an amount equal to the aggregate difference between (i) the monthly payments theretofore made to the Lender on this Note between the "Date of Taxability", as that term is defined in the Loan Agreement, and the date of receipt by the Borrower of notice of such "Determination of Taxability", and (ii) the monthly payments which would have been made during such period if the increased rate had been in effect throughout such period; all as provided in Section 4.07 of the Loan Agreement. 2. In any event, the payments hereunder shall be sufficient to pay all principal and interest due, as such principal and interest becomes due, and to pay any premium or penalty, at maturity, upon redemption, or otherwise. Interest shall be computed on the basis of a 360 day year, but charged for the actual number of days principal is unpaid. 3. Principal and interest and any penalty or premium due hereunder shall be payable at the principal office of the Lender, or at such other place as the Lender may designate in writing. 4. This Note is issued by the City to provide funds for a'Project, as defined in Section 474.02, Subdivision la, Minnesota Statutes, consisting of the construction of an office and warehouse facility,. pursuant to a Loan Agreement of even date herewith between the City and Mogren Bros., a Minnesota general partnership (the "Borrower") (the "Loan Agreement"), and this Note is further issued pursuan to and in full compliance with the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, particularly Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, and pursuant to a resolution of the City Council duly adopted on , 1980 (the "Resolution"). 5. This Note is secured by an assignment of the Loan Agreement by the City to the Lender, a Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Financing Statement, of even date herewith between the Borrower, as mortgagor, and.the Lender as mortgagee (the "Mortgage") and by an Assignment of Leases and Rents, of even date herewith, from the Borrower to the Lender - 23 - 8/91 i I (the "Assignment of Leases and Rents"). The disbursement of the proceeds of this Note is subject to the terms and conditions of a Disbursing Agreement of even date herewith between the Lender, the City and the Borrower (the "Disbursing Agreement"). _ 6. The Lender may extend the times of payments of interest and/or principal of or any penalty or premium due on this Note, including the date of the Final Maturity Date, -without notice to or consent of any party liable hereon and without releasing any such party. However, in no event may the Final Maturity Date be extended beyond thirty (30) years from the date hereof. 7. This Note may be prepaid in whole or in part on any monthly payment date without premium. The Lender shall apply any such prepayment against the accrued interest on the Principal Balance and then against the final principal amounts due under the Note. 8. This Note is further subject to prepayment, at any time, without premium, in whole or in part, at the option of the Lender, upon the occurrence of certain events of damage, destruction or condemnation of the property secured by the Mortgage, as specified in Section 5.02 of the Loan Agreement and Section 3-1 of the Resolution. 9. .The monthly payments due under paragraph 1 hereof, shall continue to be due and payable in full until the entire Principal Balance and accrued interest due on this Note have been paid regardless of any partial prepayment made hereunder. 10. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Note is transferable upon the books of the City at the office of the City Clerk, by the Lender in person or by his agent duly authorized in writing, at the Lender's expense, upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Clerk, duly executed by the Lender or his duly authorized agent. Upon such transfer the Clerk will note the date of registration and the name and address of the new registered Lender in the registration blank appearing below. The City may deem and treat the person in whose name the Note is last registered upon the books of the City with such registration noted on the Note, as the absolute owner hereof, - - whether or not overdue, for the purpose of receiving payment of or on the account, of the Principal Balance, redemption price or interest and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to the Lender or upon his order shall be valid and effective to satisfy and discharge the liability upon the Note to the extent of the sum or sums so paid, and the City shall not be affected by any notice to the contrary. - 24 - 8/21 11. All of the agreements, conditions, covenants, provisions and stipulations contained in the Resolution, the Mortgage, the Assignment of Leases and Rents, the Loan Agreement and the Disbursing Agreement are hereby made a part of this Note to the same extent and with the same force and effect as if they were fully set forth herein. 12. This Note and interest thereon and any penalty or premium due hereunder are payable solely from the -revenues and proceeds derived from the Loan Agreement, the Mortgage and the Assignment of Leases and Rents, and do not constitute a debt of the City_within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation, are not payable from or a charge upon any funds other than the revenues and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, and do not give rise to a pecuniary liability of the City or, to the extent permitted by law, of any of its officers, agents or employees, and no holder of this Note shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay this Note or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City, and this Note"does not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City, and the agreement of the City, to perform or cause the performance of the covenants and other provisions herein referred to shall be subject at all times to the availability of revenues or other funds furnished for such purpose in accordance with the Loan Agreement, sufficient to pay all costs of such performance or the enforcement thereof. 13. It is agreed that time is of the essence of this Note. In the event of failure by the City to pay when due any monthly installment of principal or interest within ten (10) days after the due date, or. any premium or penalty due hereunder, or if an Event of Default shall occur, as set forth in the Mortgage, the Assignment of Leases and Rents, the Disbursing Agreement or the Loan Agreement, then the Lender shall have the right and option to declare, the Principal Balance and accrued interest thereon, immediately due and payable, but solely from sums made available under the Loan Agreement and Mortgage. Failure to exercise such option at any time shall not constitute a waiver of the right to exercise the same at any subsequent time. 14. The remedies of the Lender, as provided herein and in the Mortgage, the Assignment of Leases and Rents, the Loan Agreement and the Disbursing Agreement, are not exclusive and shall be cumulative and concurrent and may be pursued singly, successively or together, at the sole discretion of the Lender, and may be exercised as often as occasion therefor shall occur; and the failure to exercise any such right or remedy shall in no event be construed as a waiver or release thereof. - 25 - 8/21 15. The Lender shall not -be deemed, by any act of omission or commission, to have waived any of its rights or remedies hereunder unless such waiver is in writing and signed by the Lender and, then only to the extent specifically set forth in the writing. A waiver with reference to one event shall not be construed as continuing or as a bar to or waiver of any right or remedy as to a subsequent event. 16. This Note has been issued without registration under state or federal or other securities laws, pursuant to an exemption for such issuance; and accordingly the Note may not be.assigned or. transferred in whole or part, nor may a partici- pation interest in the Note be given pursuant to any participation agreement, except in accordance with an applicable exemption from such.registration requirements. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that -all conditions, acts and things required to exist, happen and be performed precedent to or in the issuance of this Note do exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due form as required by law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Note to be duly executed in its name by the manual signatures of the Mayor and Clerk and has caused the corporate seal to be affixed hereto, and has caused this Note to be dated , 1980. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA /s/ John C. Greavu Mayor Attest: /s/ Lucille E. Aurelius Clerk (SEAL) i Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes - all. M. AD WURNMENT 12:06 A.M. (-'City,/Clerk - 26 - 8/21 CHECK* A M 0 U N T C L A I H A N T P U R P 0 S E METRO AREA MGT ASSOC TRAVEL + TRAINING 1 004670 7*00 ----66,w 44INN .—S TAT E_4REAS R T A -FEE S - -P A Y AgiwE 004672 606*00 Ml"NN STATE TREASURER DEPOSITS—DEPUTY PEGIST* 004673 4* 68 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE FEES SERVICE SHIPPING CHARGES - - 80 4 52, -58 --RAt4SEY.-.-CO.-.CLERK.---Of--31."—Zl-r ---G0UNT-Y--0/.L---FEES - PA_YA_8Ll'E_. COURT 004675 130*00 INTL CITY MGMT ASSOC TRAVEL + TO.AINING 004676. 1, 656.50 MINN STATE TREASURER DEPOSITS—DEPUTY REGIST• 0 0 4 6 N N---S T-A T E --- TREASURER S_ TATE—D IL --f F-E.S. —P-A Y A .3 L 004678 6*00 MN ENVIRN HEALTH ASSOC TRAVEL + TRAINING 004679 19000000 EMPLOYEE BE :FIT CLAIMS DEPOSITS W/PAYING AGT __.�..0 -4 8 — -- —�9 0 ..0.0. _�.» M RE C._ _ — PARK."SS-OC_ fS4_SERVlCE-____ SOFTBALL 004681 1 MINN STATE TREASURER DEPOSITS—DEPUTY REGISTe 004682 141*00 MINN STATE TREASURER STATE D/L FEES PAYABLE --A -0.4-68 3 T-R-AVFL + T R AI N LN G 004686 15t 357.85 HILLCREST MIDAMERICA FED INCOME TAX PAYABLE a .004689 59789o28 STATE OF MN _MINN INCOME TAX PAYABLE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE. . .......... . ... -004690 168.4.5 WISCONSIN OPT OF REVENUE MINN INCOME TAX PAYA34*wE DEPOSITS — DEPUTY 61v-48 -----ICMA --RE TI RENE NT -. -. CR*P - DEFERRED COMPENSATION ,,004692 200e00 HILLCREST MID AMERICA WAGE DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 004693 285,eOo- AFSCME. LOCAL 2725 UNICN DUES PAYABLE PAYABLE NECESSARY EXPENDITURES SINCE AND--FAIR SHARE FEES PAYA r U04 45*13 METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOC UNION DUE!3. PAYABLro - - 49* 50 MINN STATE TREASURED, ------ - ;� S P AYAr. AND —FAIR SHARE FE&_ " 004695. 16 9195.02 MN STATE TREASURER -wFI CA PRE;�A D EXPENSE AND-*F*I*CsAo PAYAR,-,Lcl. 004696 110000 MANN STATE TREASURER STATE D/L FEES PAY A3L;7 004697 JLt 839-o 97 - MINN STATE TREASURER DEPOSITS — DEPUTY Rc'iGIST,* 004698 137000 MINN STATE TREASURER STATE D/L FEES PAYABLE 004699 43*50 RAMSEY GO CLERK OF D3 ST COUNTY D/L FEI;.:-,"*">' PAYABLE NECESSARY EXPENDITURES SINCE COURT 904700 - 49* 50 MINN STATE TREASURED, ------ - STATE D/L FEES PAY ABLE 004701 918087 -MINN STATE TRO"EASUR.R OIE-POSITS-DEPUTY REGISTa 004702 80. 00 MFLS POLICE PISTOL CLUB TR$VEL + TRAINING -004703 2, 530.,00 CONSOLIDATED TOURS FEES, SERVICE GALS GETAWAY 004704 142*00 MINN STATE TREASURER STATE D/L FEES PAYABLE 004705 982.00 MINN STATE TREASURER DEPOSITS — DEPUTY REGISTO 7 _06. MINN -- -STAT TREASURER -STATE --DlL+__F__EE_S___P_AY.A8LE 004707 X394.64 MINN STATE TREASURt'P% O*rl.'P0SITl'%cp-mDEPUTY ,RE GIST. 004708 1,175.66 MlilN STATE TREASURtil-IR. 0EPOSITS-w0c'PUTY R;l.:-GIST. __139 _MINN _STATZ----T-P%_t "-ASJJR-E - - ---- -STATE F -AY A SL E 40 NECESSARY EXPENDITURES SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING 0068i8 840 03 ACE HAROW'ARE SMALL TOOLS - - - -- - -. -- - - SUPPLIES , O FF I C E 1 :006820 43.50 ALL STEEL SOCCER GOALS SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT 006821 -- J - -- 26,237.50 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BONDS PAYABLE AND -w80NO INTEkEST CHARGES T 006822 37, E85. 00 AMERICAN NATI CNA;. BANK 80N .S PAYA8 ANO-BOND INTEKEST ANA?- OTHER CHA GES nD6823 - 52,817. SOD _1�t�ERICAN i�l4TICNAL-- EAN - - -- -- .. _ - - - - -- 30 NOS - P.AYABLE ANN-80N0, INTEmc ST AND -OTHER CHARGES 00 -682 + 130.02 AM# -RICAN TOOL SUPP.Y CO SMALL TOOLS - . -- __.- ARNALS - AU T.0 - SERVICE - - - - -- - --- - - - -- - - - -- - FUEL - .+--OIL - - -- - - - -- AND-R'P . + MA 1" NT. , it E Hi Cl 006826 358* 15 A MSTRGNG INDUSTRIES - -- QUIPNENT, O 'HER - 006827 81998 OAT,T ERY f TIRE WHSE INC SU PP LI ES s VEHICLE 00632 15.95 SELL INDUSTRIES MAINTENANCE MATERIALS D D6 829 34.76 .BERG TORS ETH, INC - - - - -- -.. SUPPLI V EHi CLE 006830 656.g9 BOARD OF WATEER COH4 OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEES _-- 006 d 31 _ - -- 135.54 BOARD OFWATER COMM UTILITIES .SU.P _P.LIES,_V_EH.l CLE._ 0 33 068 : 4 019.20 BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTIN OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEES 006834 82.50 BULLSEYE INC SUPPLIES, FLANGE 14 D`0E 835 0 0 6 8 35 .006837 006838 00,839 006840 0 06 841 7.60 150a 00 7.89 220.00 3130.00 54.00 0061342-- 945.70 CENTURY CAMERA SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT --- - -JUOY -CNLE BECK - -- - - -- TRAVEL -+ TRAINING CLUTCH? + U —JOINT ST PAUL. SUPPLIES, EQUIPMEN'' COAST Tp COAST STORES SMALL T COLS . CCFY - OUP�.ICAT ING,- ,PROCTS . -- __ OUPL ICATING COSTS PAT OALEY FE ES, SFPVI _ PLBG & SEWER INSPECTIONS CASCO INC` MAINTENANCE MATE �. DAWSON — PATTERSON _ -__ PUBL 006843 29060a 00 EAST CCUATY LINE FIRE CE FEES, SERVICE FIRE PROTECTION 006844 153.82 E AST COUNTY L INE FIRE vE FUEL + OIL --- - --0.0 6 845 r _ - -- - - _ g. I6 _._.. EAST_SIDE _- --'--- SUPPLIES, VENT LE OL�,846 41.23 JAMES G �LIAS TRAVEL } TRAINING 006847 99.50 FA RWELL OZ4, UN. KIRK + CO SMALL TOOLS 006648 - - -- .. -- - - - -- 53.20 _ . - -IGOR =_FEJOA....._... -- __..__._..._____.._ - - -- w _ - -' 'DTNF CONSTRUCTION COSTS DISEASED TREES(MILEAGE) 006849 14.1, 70 FOREMAN + CLARK UNIFORMS # C .OTNING 006850 20.60 GEN INCUST SUFFLY CO SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT ------ II.06851 __._ -- 45,2- 0 0 ADS TONE_ E -IRE - GENT._.. __._ - - - -- - _' EEES v - SERVICE - - FIRE PROTECTION 00685.2 38.53 GOGOYEAR SERVICE STORE REP• ♦ MAINT. VEHICLES 006853 156. O1) DUANE GRA FEES, SERVICE BUILDING INSPECTIONS —5.-* 7 G -.- ----J At4E T GRE- -N - - - -- — '--TR A V EL - - - }. _T R A i N I N G 006855 294.20 GROS INDUSTRIAL FEES, SERVICE ANC UN I FORMS + CLOTHING CARPET SERVICES 006856 112.36 GRUBERS HAROW ARE HANK MAINTENANCE MATERIALS _AN0 -SUPPL -ES - EQU --- aw i • •- CHECK` A MOUNT CL AIM ANT PURPOSE } ANO -REP. + MAi NT, it EOUIP� AND�UNIFOfiMS f CLOTHING -9 +.63 _.. _ .THOMAS -,L .. HA G£N - - - - -- - - TRAVEL -+. TRAINING AND-UNIFORMS ♦ CLOTHING D0f-85fl 77.50 INC SCH30 L DI ST 622 FEES, SERVICE SOCCER & BASKETBALL 006859 it* t3 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO INC SUPPLIES9 E 0068 O , -- _ 25.50 J # J TRJPLAYS SPORTS SUPPLIES, OFFI CE AND- SUf'PLiLS, PROGRAM 0 0 68 61* i T, 995.0 0 JU *A N# 4003Y INC LE GAL + FISCAL 006862. 1 .0�► - - MART SUPPLIES, PnOGRA M 006863 255.58 XNGX LUM3EK CCMPANY MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 142.00 L AKE SANI TATIZ ON FEES, SERVICE .006864 TRASH REMOVAL D 06 865 - =- = -- 2 0 , 082.00 _ LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA - - - WORKERS COMP . PREMIUM - 006; 66 76, 87 LEES AUTO SUPPLY SUPPLIES, EOUiPMENT .. AND - SMALL TOOLS _. - . ANO-- SUIPPLIES, VEH .0D6867 --_ - --- ____- -'- - ��.95 - -- - �.£Nf��- iNC _____ -- __. -___ _. _ -_ -_--- - - -- - - - -- �£�.' -# - -MAZNT. , VcH ICL; =S 00b868 89011 #.UG£R LUMBER MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 006869 '` 2037s50 337.50 MAFLcLEAF OFF ICIALS ASSN FEES, Sct�lliCE SOFTBALL ---- 0b$T -II �-- -- - - -- -x.17 ----- '--- MAPLE W003 -.- •BAKERY-- . -- .___ _- _- '----- - -_SU .I ES, -PROGRAM - _--- -- __ 006871 « 70.92 MAPLEWOOO DA SUPPLIES, PROGRAM - 0068 2 T 668 .6 9 MAPLEWOOD REVIEW PUBLISHING AND -OTHER CONS 'RUCTIO4 Cl 00687 3 - -- . - - ----- - - - - -- -- • - ----- 5L80 ---- _.--- _ �M . CCANN INDUSTRIES INC FE£S, SERVICE POLICE OFFICER EXAMS ;ITY OF MAPLEWOOD A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A 8 L E DATE 09 -18 -80 PAGE 6 tH ECK* A M O U N T C L A 1 M A N T P U R P O S E 1 ,0 0 6 374 43.13 MERIT CWE VROL ET CO SUPPLIES, VEHICLE 006875 - - -- - --- __ 910. - METRO IN; PCECT ION Sr RV ICE FEES, -- SERVICE ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS 006876 9.30 MiGW AY TRACTOR ♦ EQUI C SUPPLIES, VEH.& CLE 006377 48.00 , PPLS STAR + TRIBUNE CO PUBLISHING 006878 -- 7 ,0 .09 -NN REG + PARKS ASSOC -- - -- - - -- SUBSCRIPTIONS #M- EMBERSHIP 006879 1,367913 MN U NEMPL OY C CMP F UND UN COMP. OOE880 15.02 STATE OF MN REP. # MAINS`., EQUIPMENT DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION - - 152.55 MINUTEMAN ,N PRINTING . - - - -- - - - -- - - FEES, SERVICE - :- AN0-SUPPLI S, OFFI C= 006882 228080 MOGREW 220 S . ANO jCAPI NG MAINTENANCE MATERIAL S 006883 304. SO MOTOROLA INC SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT, _ 006884 I. 049.15 MUNICIPAL. SERVICE FEES, SERVICE ANIMAL CONTROL 006885 -- 360.00 NUCO INC _ -8U ILOING IMPRC VEMi NT . D0688f� '` 88914 NATI CNAL SUPE RMARKETS SUPPLI PPOGRA M 006887 1 , 851, 21 NEEN AH FOUNDRY MAINTENANCE MATERIALS .006a88-.- __ - 1, 370, 91 CITY OF NORTM ST PAUL. _ - _._ _._ UT I�.1TIES _ - - -- - - 006889 108.15 NORTH ST PAUL DAIRY SUPPLIES, PROGRAM 006890 939.58 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO UTILITIES -- N OP. T iiERN .- STATES -P 0 W E R - - -t-0 -- -- _ -- - — U T I AL I T I E S -- --- - - - - -- 006392 :579.70 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO UTILITIES 006893 #394.02 NORTHERN ST ATES POWER CO UT --- NORT ES_lP0W.ER-.CO _ -_ - -- -- -- - U TILITIES - - .__.. - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- 006895 48 NW NATIONAL BANK OF MPLS BONO PRINCIPAL -- N0 -00N0 -I NTFRES - - -- CAL C K* A M O U N T C L A I M A N T a i P U R P O S E D 06X396 23 7, 892.45 NN NATIONAL BANK OF 4PLS SONGS PAYABLE kv AND — BOND INTEREST .. ..... . __ ...__ - - - - - - -- — __ - -- ___ _._.. A N O - D T N F - C H A R G £ S 006597 355, x.54.70 NW NATIONAL 6ANK OF 4PLS DONDS PAYABLE - - -- _.. - - AND -m BOND PRINCIPAL AN 0-- BOND INTEREST 006898- -- 504, 04 - -- .- N0kTHwESTE,RN ZELL -TEL - TELEPHONE __.. 006999 1,083.48 NORTHWESTERN BEL TEL CO TELEFHONL 006900 E41. 36 NORTHWESTERN BELL TEL C0 TELEPHONE 006901. 748. *61 - .NORTHWESTERN --$ELF. - �T;L--- .Cfl_- _____- - -- -- TELEPHONE - - - 006902 302. T3 NOKTHWE�ST ERN TIRE CO INC RE. . t MAINT. , i�EH Iki L E S ENO- SUPPLIES, V EHI GLE _ 006903 5000 LAVERNE NUTESON TRAVEL + TRAINING 006904 63, 302.40 GEORGE W OLSE N CONST CO AWARDED CONST CONTRA 0 06905 12, 00 - _"ARJORIE O OS TROM - - -- - - - - - - - -_ _TRAVEL } TRAINING - -- - 006906. 550 60 OXYGEN SERVICE CO INC SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT 006907 29,160.00 PARKSIOE FIRE DEPT _ FEES SE RVICt FIRE PROTECTION 006905_ 2 075* 00 PET£RSON, BELL _ CONVERSE-___ - -- .- ..-- -FEES, SERVICE _ -- PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 006909 360000 PHYSIO CONTROL RtP. + MAINT., EQUIPMLNT 006910 79.00 R L POLK + COMPANY BOOKS _0069-11. - - --- 9 3 35 - --- A MA L - w_Y_P R IN T .IN.G_ U#?P_LI ES -s - -- tp P..M E .T_ 006912 11.08 RAPIC COPY INC .: SUPPLIES, PROG 006913 9.00 CALE E RAZSKAZOFF TRAVEL + TRAINI -NG -T 4 .R EEO.-- -TIRE-- S ► ._£ S- C. ___R£P. _._±._._lA i N T s ..v-- - - - -fit EH I C LE S------ 0 51.90 REtOS SAL ES + SERVICE MAINTENANCE HATEkI ASS _ AND - SMALL TOOLS r Ao -_i 696 32 5 RICHARDS SUPPLIES, VE HICLE DO691 7 -- -- - - -__ — 314. ED ROAD RESCUE INC REF. + NAINT. , VEH ICLES D069i $ 79.40 RUGGED RENTAL RUGS FEES, SERVICE - --- _ -_ - -- -- - - - - j CARPET SERV ICE S 006919 43.36 S ♦ T OFF ICE F200UCTS SUPPLIES, OFFICE 006920 408. 00 SATELLIT` SERVICE CO FL LS, SERVICc" CHEMICAL TOILETS 006921 1 552.21 � T A SCHIFSKY + SONS INC MAINTENANCE HA 3ERI AL S 006 9 22 405.93 J L SH1 'EL Y C0 MAINTENANCE MATERI 1036923 Db923 1 546.30 , SOIL EXPLORATION CO OUTSIDE` ENGINEERING FEES 006924 5.34 ST PAUL 3000 STAT IONERY i Y SUPPLI OFFS C� 006925 . 646.85 CITY OF ST PAUL. REP* + MAINT• 1 `RA� IO 006926 36 - CITY OF ST PAUL- - FEES 9 SERVICE 3M FIRE RUNS OO692 7 9 Gi EGORY L STAF NE TRAVEL + TRAINING p Ob928 C73. 25 STG SPRING + ALIGNM REP* + M A I N T .. V E M I C L E S .. fl.Ob929 - _ .....__.- - 7.95 SUPERAME.RICA _._ - - -- _.. FUEL + OIL - � + �AI'� VEHI Argo RPpo T , OOfi930 _ _ ---- 3bb•�3 - -- - _ TAOULAT14G_._-RV ._SU -IREAU _ _.�____ - -- ___ -- - PUBLISHING AN — wFEcS, SEkVIGE DATA PROCESSING - - -- --- - --_ -- -- - ----- ITL -- Il�S- -CD - -_ -INN -- _ - - - -- OTTER- _CONSTRUCTION- C-OSTS - BEAM AVENUE 006932 22.95 THIN CITY FILTER SERV IN FEES, SERVICE ------ -Al-R- -FILTER LEANTNG 005933 3 •90 9 9 TWIN CITE' TESTING OUTSIDE ENGiNEtRIN G FEES - - O 069 _ _ - - - - -. _ _ .- - 3 8 3. -1.5 - - - - -- V A S BODY S i� 0 F - -- A!R — INSURANCE. ©05935 T05 20 VIRTUE PRINTING CO SUPPLIES, OFFICE - 3 6 162*96 VOIGTS MO FEES* Sp RV I CE GA LS GETAWAY _JANIT ORIAL -- _ AN VEHI CLE D SU PPLI ESv AND,-SUPPLIE'St EQU' OMENT AND -.MAINTENANCE MATtRIALS A N D -SMALL TOOLS A N 0,- SU PP L I E S,9 PF OGRAM 006933 2*00 4 WASTE MGT OF HN INC FEES, SER VICE TRASH DUMPING 1,NGHO USE ELECTPIC SUPPLI Plcl,, JANITORI AL 00r 3.8., 15 wEST 006C0 ) 4 14,, 365, 00 YOCUM OIL GO INC FUEL + ojL _ - - -- - --- - -- _ E-S SALARIOE-7S + WAGC. 9 TE D 8694 550*12 LINOA O IXON SALARIES _+ WAGES, TE MP 006942 12 4,m50 L THE EjSA f0l Ey . S A L A RI t., + W AGES, TEMP* 006943 422*62 DEBRA 0 NEIL 1 - _____ - Ti MP * _S + WAGES, SALARIE — 006944 196, b2 ALBERT RASCHKEm f WAGES T E. 14 P 0 059 _ 4 5,* .0 0 RICHARD RASCHKE__---- -SALARIES 0-06946 2 a 0 CL.--MENTINA ANDERSON R E F U N 0 GETAW AY M ]L' A L.S 91.44 SAM BL004 IRON + NET A 'be MAI NTENANCE &- NANC 0061347 -.E- -- F-. U N _D SOCCER R E F U N 0 006949 56000 JO O UNK IAEL A -L-O�E-TAWAY-- R E F U N 01-ANE FINCH SOCCER OCCER �!AI�. LLD ROS + AAWRENC _G_"NC -REP-0 �_ 4 0 _, * - ------ R E F N D 006 91000 LYNNE LEDIN __ _ -S-O CLER-- -- -- - -- 006953 8* 00 JOAN MCDONOUGH R E F U N D SOCCER 13ARA__UCfl0.w — -BAR- SOCCER — — ----------- CITY - OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK # AMOUNT 6955 93.50 6956 56.00 6957 9.00 6958 1,319.41 6959 49.35 AC C O U N T S P A Y A B L E C LA I MAN T MIDWAY GARAGE FLORENCE SCHI CKLING MARGARET SIEDOW VARDA COMPANY TAFFYS C HECKS WRITTEN 142 1,060, TOTAL OF 182 CHECKS TOTAL 1,12 TO INDICATES ITEM PAID FOR BY RECREATION FEES 09_18_80 page 10 PURPOSE REPAIR 8 MAINT VEHICLE REFUND GALS GETAWAY REFUND SOCCER EQUIPMENT, OTHER SUPPLIES, PROGRAM CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER - PAYROLL DATED C9 -12-80 DATE 09 -i2 -8? CHECK NO. CLAIMANT GIR 3 -5 S NE T 25464 BARRY R EVANS 1, 536.g2 978.14 25465 V I V I A N R LEWIS 6?5. i1 4190- 25466 LAURIE L BERGSTEDT 522.00 349.28 25467 DAAI EL F FAUST 1,222e89 795.5 ?_ 25468 ARL I NE J HAGE'.1 751 331.4 7 25469 ALANA K MATHEYS 522. )0 tj 424. 8 2.5470 ANNE M R I CHARDS 171.97 147.8 25471 LUC I LLE E AU RFL I US 1, 142.Cs0 635.27 25472 PHYLLIS C GKEtN 761.18 515.73 25473 BETTY 0 SELVUG 534.31 364920 25474 LORRA I NE S V I ETOR 478, 15 304s58 25475 JEANAF L SCHA`)T 183.)2 148.21 25476 ALFRED J PELOCUI N 601 .135 68o92 25477 JAMES G KLEIN 1 ,)6.25 96.14 25478 T E RKANCF C k !LEY 119000 114.2 8 25479 DAV I t) L ARI "JOL n 966.46 314.72_ 2 5480 JO�i'� �-� ATCH I S': '� 84.8.:31 25481 ANTHONY G CAI-4A (' * 969,69 545.69 25482 DALE K CLAUS0 877 *99 68.45 25483 KENIN&TH V COLLINS ')70.15 164.7 w 25484 DENt41S J nELY.,04 IT 1, 126.23 161 * 10 25485 RICHARD C DREGER 967.35 552.8 25486 RAY M OND E FERz6 848931 237.1.6 25487 NORPIA d L GREEN 986.77 515.46 25488 THOMAS L HAGEN 1, 204, 31 174.43 25489 KEV .1 N R HALW;: 8489 419, 54 ' 25493 MICHAEL J HERBERT 848. "31 480.80 25491 DUNA V KOR TUS 328.6'? ?31 .06 25492 R I CI3AR D J LANG 911 • `32 511 ..r,4 25493 JOHA J MC NULTY 986031 555.57 25494 JAM E MEEHA J'R 807.69 447.45 25495 DANI FL b MET TL } R 871.38 753..)3 25496 RICHARD M MOE SCHTER 848931 52.2.16 25497 RAYMOND J MORELL I 832.15 553.73 25498 - - -- ROBERT D NELSOi4- -- VOID - - - - -- 996.36r---- - - - - -- 692 * 49 25499 WILLI F PELT I ER 949* 85 523.57 25500 RICHARD W SCHALLER 1 806.33 25501 D0INyILD W SKAL MAN 848.31 10.79 25502 GREGORY L STAFNE 848.31 512.80 25503 VER4074 T STILL 832.15 482.61 25504 DARKELL T STOCKTON 832, I5 544 .69 25505 DUANE J W ILLIAMS 880.62 446.65 25506 JOSEPH A ZAPPA 938615 640983 25507 DEBURAH A BASTYR 413.08 255.9;) 25508 JAYME L FLAUGHER 583.95 383.99 25509 DENI SF KAY LOWRI E 49, 60 49.60 2.5510 GEORGE W MULWEE 496.15 3.14.76 25511 KAREN A NELSON 520.95 326.55 25512 JOY E OMATH 468030 322.89 25513 JULIE K SCOTT 464.77 311.72 25514 JOANNE M SVENDSEN 587.43 385 * 82 25515 MICHELE A TUCtINER 545.75 295.76 25516 RONALD 0 BECK ER 887.54 198.02 25517 DE N741 S S CUS I CK 1 126.2 3 72.3.92 25518 DAVID M GRAF 887.54 409.82 25519 ROGER W LEE 968.55 564015 25520 JON A ME LANDER 963 .07 81.81 25521 CAROL M NELSON 811.38 489.19 25522 DALE E RAZSK AL OF F 887.54 130.81 25523 CAROL L RICHIE 414.86 291.53 25524 MICHAEL P RYAN 918.18 415.42 25525 ROBERT E VORWERK 991.42 203.07 25526 JAMES G YOUNGREN 897.38 526.36 25527 JAMES M EMBERTSON 740:77 490.39 255.28 ALFRED C SCHADT 953.54 582.10 25529 LARRY J CODE 138.46 113.50 25530 WILLIAM L BI TTNEK 1- 831.97 25531 JAMES G ELIAS 790.62 440.73 25532 MARY A NEMETL 464.77 311.72 25533 DENIMS L PECK 790.62 452.98 25534 JUDITH A WEGWERTH 277.82 2.13.75 25535 ROBERT F WI LL I AMSON 730.77 464.74 t.rlCLm IVU* I,LAL MAN I !(I� 25536 IGOR V FEJDA 725.08 25537 PETER R GANZ EL 360.00 25538 GREGORY U K E I L 417.15 25539 JAMES M CURTIS 302.40 25540 WALTER M GEISSLER 820.26 25541 JAMES T GESSELE 674.31 25542 KE'VNETH G HA I DER X158, 62 25543 WILLIAM C CASS 978.46 25544 RONALD L FREBERG 696.R0 25545 RO` ALn J HEL EY 696.80 2.5546 MICHAFL R KANE 696.80 25547 HENRY F KLAUS I NG 696. 25548 GERALD W MEYEk 696.80 25549 AR jLD H PFAR? 707. 24 25550 JOSE B PRETTNER 920.00 25551 EDWARD A RE I NEr T 696.80 25552 GFORUF J RICHARD 696.80 25553 HARRY J TEVL I N J R 711* 30 25554 TH0' AS G BERG 84.00 25555 JEFFREY N GR I EMANN 148 *00 25556 ER I CK D OSWALD 288 * 30 25557 f RAOLF Y J QUINN 224.00 25558 ALEX ROSKOW I NSK I 256, D0 ' 25559 GI LnERT C LAROCHE 504.92 25560 M PAUL I'VE ADAMS 679.85 25561 RUDOLPH R ,. ARA }TKO 893.54 2.5562 LOI S J EIRE_ NER 556.15 25563 HAR!ARA A KRUMMEL 235.40 25564 ROBERT D ODEGARD 1, 153.85 25565 ROY G WARD 277.65 25566 MYLES R BURKE 696.80 1 25567 DAVID A GERMAIN 696.8-3 25568 ME LV I N J CCU S I N DA 971, 7 5 25569 ROLAND B HELEY 707.24 25570 PARK A MARUSKA 608.00 25571 REED) E SANTA 722.93 25572 MICHAEL L JUNKER 283900 25573 ROBERT T FI 256.00 25574 GARY P JOHNSON 43.20 25575 RANDEE L NELSON 162950 25576 BARBARA J BRUNELL 191.60 25577 JANET M GREW 519. ?0 25578 JUDITH A HORSNELL 243.00 25579 C H R I S T I N E SOUTTER 571.12 2.5580 JUDY M CHLEBECK 584.31 25581 THOMAS G EKSTRAND 745.49 25582 RANDALL L JOHNSON 636.46 25583 NANCY J MI SKELL 287.40 25584 GEOFFREY W OLSON 1, 133.69 25585 MARJORIE OSTROM 958.62 25586 ROBERT J WENGER 735.82 25587 RICHARD J BARTHOLOMEW 710.40 25588 DAV 1 D 8 EDSON 700.04 25589 EDWARn A NADEAU 803.64 25590 LAVCRNE S NUTESON 1, 058.00 25591 GERALD C OWEN 710.40 25592 WILLIAM S THCNE 777.00 25593 TIMOTHY J HERBER 160900 25594 TIMOTHY J MARKEE 160.00 25595 JOHN E MACDONALD 768980 25596 DENNIS M MULV ANEY 743.20 CHECK NUMBER 25464THRU 25596 90.998915 PAYROLL DATED 09 -12 -80 IN C 484.77 287.21 327.09 279.56 513.25 451.87 366.41 501.43 446.45 446.45 304.53 391.76 348.62 462,o88 628.47 446.45 428.72 508 64 84.U0 137.64 288, 00 196. 53 256 co 0 339.93 433.71 563.44 1,95.26 139.22 727.63 217. ?3 436.8£ 442.40 555,77 464.11 400 e 94 401.54 2 35.45 220.71 42.47 154,61 150.61 347.82 186.00 376.90 270,90 465.59 40{x.93 211.69 628.94 610.60 487.73 389.02 433.78 537.99 417.33 472.33 512.62 147.31 147.31 497.63 463.97 51,237.26 25498 ROBERT D NELSON - -- VOID - - - -- (996.86)-- - - - - -- (692.49) 25597 ROBERT D NELSON .996o86 667.49 1 ** TOTALS * ** 90 51,212.26 4 -,- -,.A- * September 10, 1980 STAFF REPORT To: City Manager Barry Evans E �;� n _' From: Director of Public Safety Richard W. Schaller„ Subject: Budget Transfer Request D t'. L r: Proposal It is requested that the City Council authorize an increase in the revenues and expenditures within the 1980 paramedic budget as described below. Background .,, On December 21, 1978, the City Council authorized an Emergency Medical Technician training program and the expenditure of Public Safety paramedic training funds (4390) to provide such training. The Minnesota Health Department has accredited our curriculum and as such all training costs are reimbursed with State grant money. With these types of grants, payment is not made to the City until the ' successful completion of the course by each student is documented. The majority of instruction is done by physicians and nurses from St. Paul Ramsey Hospital, along with our paramedic officers, who are paid their respective salary rates through the reimbursement funds. In addition to the above salary expenses, books, handout materials, medical equipment and secretarial services are needed during the courses. We now have the need to provide a refresher EMT training course to 75 of our firefighting personnel before December 31, 1981. The following is a projected cost summary to provide this training prior to receiving our grant money allocation: Account 4010 75 hours paramedic instruction time ($15) $1 10 hours clerical time ($10) 100.00 4020 10 hours nurse instruction time ($25) 250.00 30 hours lay instruction time ($10) 300.00 50 hours nurse tutorial time ($10) 500.00 4170 Books and materials 100.00 4480 National Registry examination fees and practical examination fee 800.00 10 hours physician instruction time ($35) 350.00 $3,525.00 Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council authorize the increase in revenues and expenditures with the appropriate paramedic wage a d- commgdity accounts as described b above. RWS:js cc - Finance Director Jw- MEMORANDUM TO City Manager FROM Finance Director and Public Works Director RE - Transfer to Close Gladstone Park Storm Sewer Project DATE September 10, 1980 PROPOSAL It is proposed that a transfer from the General Fund be authorized to close the Gladstone Park Storm Sewer Project. BACKGROUND May 3, 1979 Council ordered feasibility study for storm sewer to serve English Manor P.U.D. contingent on developer paying 100/ of the study's cost. July 11, 1979 Ar -Mon Properties deposited $6,000 with City for feasibility study. .January 3, 1980 Check in the amount of $6,000 issued to consultant (Kirkham- Michael and Associates) for feasibility study. February 7, 1980 Council reviewed feasibility study and set public hearing date. February 21, 1980 Council approved 1979 charges for in -house engineering which included $2,720 for the Gladstone Park Storm Sewer Project, March 5, 1980 Informational meetings held with citizens at which time it be- came apprent that the consultant would have to supply additional information for the public hearings. March 13, 1980 Public hearing held and project rejected by Council. March 26, 1980 Developer billed for in -house engineering charges. April 25, 1980 Developer rebi l l ed for in-house engineering charges. May 15, 1980 Check in the amount of $2,151.57 issued to consultant for extra work done on feasibility study.- May 28, 1980 Developer rebilled for in -house engineering charges. It should be noted that, although not clarified in the staff reports or Council minutes, the engineering staff Droceeded under the assumption that the developer's deposit was for consulting fees only. Therefore, no cost estimate was included for in-house engi- neering when the developer was requested to deposit $6,000. Also, -the consulting fees above $6,000 represents the cost of a change in scone of the feasibility study requested by the Council. This additional work was to address drainage problems in the area which were not' attributable to the developer's proposed project. The following is a summary of financial transactions for this project: Consultant engineering costs $ 8 In -house engineering costs 2 Interest expense on cash deficit 155.61 Miscellaneous public hearing costs 42.31 Total costs 11 Less developer deposit - 6 Less interest on deposit - 282.68 Cash deficit on 7 -31 -80 $ 49786.81 At this point, it is apparent that Ar -Mon Properties will not pay any further amounts as the storm sewer improvements were needed for their project. Therefore, the City's only alternative is to finance the remaining costs by a transfer from the General Fund. The 1980 Budget includes $30,000 for these types of transfers and none of this has been used to date. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council authorize a transfer from the General Fund to eliminate the cash deficit in the Gladstone Park Storm Sewer Project so that it can be closed. o : 1 ry t ; r �.' .i lL l ./ ._ -1- F'.r1�i 1. _ -_.c. �....�_...- ..�w........r.w 1 1 ;- . �... M�.�.- ..w...� MEMORANDUM TO City Manager `,rte "n FROM: Finance Director RE Transfers of State Street Construction Aid Endo r�:'__ ---��- DATE: September 9, 1980 1.11 s i f _i a--- --.� -- R ' C C L Proposal It is proposed that $671,350 be transferred from the Street Construction State Aid Fund to the Special Assessment Fund to partly finance four improvement projects. BACKGROUND State aid allotments f" street construction are receipted into the Street Construction State Aid (S.C.S.A.) Fund. When the amount of state aid to be used on an individual project is determined, the money is transferred out of the .S . C. S. A. Fund to the project. However, the . exact amount state aid needed to finance a project is not determined until construction is complete and the special assessments have been levied. However, when a project is ordered, a tentative financing plan is adopted which indicates the estimated state aid amount needed. Currently there are four improvement projects that require state aid financing. The amount of state aid needed (based on the tentative financing plans) and the projects are ' as follows: $150,000 - Project #77 -09, Gervai s- Germain to White Bear 300 - Project #77-12 Maryland Avenue 61 - Pro jlect #78 -01 Gervai s - East of Hwy. 61 160, - Project #79 -0131 Cope Avenue Connection $ 671 5 350 - Total It is recommended that the above amounts be transferred out of the S.C.S.A. Fund to the Special Assessment Fund to provide needed financing for the above projects. When the financing plan is finalized for the above projects, more state aid can be provided if needed and available. The current status of the S . C. S. A. Fund is as follows. Cash and investments $ 918 State aid receivable 322 Total assets 1 Less above transfers - 671 Amount avai l*abl a for future transfers $ 569 The state aid receivable amount is based on the City's original allotment for 1980. It is not known at this time whether the Governor's budget cutback will affect this amount receivable. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council approve transfers totaling $671,350 from Street Construction State Aid Fund to the Special Assessment Fund to finance the following projects: $150,000 - Project #77 -09 300 - Project #77 -12 61 - Project #78 -01 160 - Project #79 -01 $671,350 Total f/ r� MEMORANDUM TO City Manager FROM Finance Director '"' RE Transfer of Reforestration Grant DATE September 9, 1980 Proposal Ac Daze It is proposed that the $1,276.20 recently received as a supplemental refor- estration grant be transferred from the Special Assessment Fund to the funds that originally expended the money for reforestration. BAC KG RO HN-D Under the state's Shade Tree Disease Control Program, cities are eligible for grants to finance sanitation and reforestration costs, Reforestration is defined in the statute as "the replacement of shade trees removed from public property and the planting of any species of tree as part of a municipal disease control program In 1979, the City's first application for a reforestration grant was prepared as this was the first year that a significant number of trees were planted which were eligible under the grant program. The City's first grant amounted to $3,681.82 for 561 trees planted in parks during 1979 which represented 41/ of the eligible costs. The City's second reforestration grant was for 41% of eligible costs totaling $5,199.80 which were incurred for moving, planting, and watering 72 donated trees, These costs were financed by the following funds: $ 1,677.10 General Fund 484.00 Nature Center Construction Fund 2 Park Development Fund _ 4 5 633.92 Sewer Fund $ .8 9 881.62 Total Some of these costs were financed by the Sewer Fund as most of the trees planted and moved (for the second grant) were located adjacent to sewer pump stations, the Public Works Garage, and water stations. The supplemental reforestration grant in the amount of $1,276.20 represents addi tional reimbursement for the costs covered by the first two grants This supplemental grant resulted when the State increased the reimbursement rate from 41/ to 50/ in order to eliminate the surplus they had for the 1979 Shade Tree Program. The reforestration grant money received was deposited in the City's Special Assessment Fund for the 1979 Shade Tree Disease Program pursuant to the requirements of state law. Previously the Council approved transfers of this money to the above funds to reimburse them for 41/ of the amounts expended. Now additional transfers are needed to reimburse the above Funds for an additional 9/ of the amounts expended. These transfers are allowable accord - in g 9 to the Accounti Director for the State Department of Agriculture which administers this grant program. Recommendati on _ -AV 1 It is recommended -that the $1,276.20 supplemental reforestration grant money be transferred from the Special Assessment Fund to the funds that originally financed the reforestration costs. MEMORANDUM TO City Manager 1a FROM: Finance Director � '.� l�� �✓ � RE Renewal of Contracts for Employee Insurance DATE: September 8, 1980 Act '1 r' 'r 1.11 ►�� _ _. : 1E _1 •.` PROPOSAL It is proposed that the existing one -year contracts for employee insurance be renewed with Group Health Plan and Employee Benefits Plan. RACKGRn[JND The current one -year contracts with Group Health Plan and Employee Benefits Plan expire October 1, 1980. State law requires that employee group insurance be rebid at least once every four years. Two years ago, bids were taken and a contract was awarded to Group Health Plan to provide health and dental benefits. Group Health Plan is a Health Maintenance Organization (H.M.O.) which emphasizes preventative medi cine and has its own clinic and doctors. Employees have had the option of choosing coverage either with Blue Cross/Blue Shield or Group ealth Plan. However dental coverage with G.H.P. is available P only to employees that have medical coverage with Group Health Plan. In order to make dental coverage available to employees not covered by G.H.P., the City has had a self- insurance dental plan that is administered by Employee Benefit Plans, Inc. which reviews, processes, and pays cl aims. E. B.P. has indicated that it w i l l administer the City's dental self- insurance plan at the same cost as the past two years which is 8/ of the claims paid plus a $300 annual consulting fee, G.N.P. has indicated that its medical and • dental premium rates w i l l be the same as those presently in effect with certain coverage changes as outlined in the attached (pages 2 and 3 of their July 30th letter). Also, G.H.P. i ndi - sated that an additional benefit option was available to cover outpatient mental health benefits for a small additional pre- mium. Consequently, the attached survey was sent to all employees covered by G.H.P. to determine their level of interest in this additional benefit A majority of the employees that responded to the survey were in favor of this additional benefit. Therefore it's recommended that the outpatient mental health benefit be approved as an additional benefit which w i l l cause the premium rate for family medical coverage to be $100.29 per month. The premium rate for fami dental coverage is $29.05 per month. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the existing one -year contracts for employee insurance be renewed (as outlined above) with Group Health Plan and Employee Benefits Plan. Mr. Barry Evans . -2- July 30, 1980 SUMMARY OF THE PLAN'S BASE COVERAGE CHANGES SECTION 2 PRESENT CERTIFICATE Referral surgery for congenital malformation Referral physical therapy PRIOR BENEFIT NEW BENEFIT Accidental dental injury bene- fits r ,,"TTNKI I DwrcrmT rrDrrTrTrATr Member paid 25% of charges after $800 100% coverage Member paid 25% of charges after $300 100% coverage per incident None Prompt treatment of in- PRIOR BENEFIT jury to sound natural teeth, by Plan Dentists. Member pays dental lab charges, if any. a -of-area medical benefits Covered physician services reimbursed Medical and outpatient on a $6.00 per unit 1964 California expenses covered at 80% Relative Value Study schedule. Cer -* of fair and reasonable I f tain outpatient hospital services charge. No maximum paid in full. Separate $50 x -ray/ limit. lab and $100 accidental injury .bene- r; fit maximums. SECTION 4, PRESENT CERTIFICATE PRIOR BENEFIT 3 NEW BENEFIT F: Inpatient alcoholism /chemical 100% coverage up to 73 days while i i Same coverage limits dependency treatment p y covered b the Plan y ,.when authorized t but unauthorized care '} by GHP Chemical Dependency counselor. is not covered. a 80% coverage for same limits when not authorized by GHP. SECTIONS 2, 3 4 4A 6 PRESENT CERTIFICATE PRIOR BENEFIT NEW BENEFIT Dialysis and/or transplantation None ;E 90% of coverage of serv- 3 for chronic kidney failure ices for chronic kidney 3 failure including dialy -1 sis and /or transplanta- tion. SECTION 4A PRESENT CERTIFICATE PRIOR BENEFIT NEW BENEFIT r Skilled nursing services, oxygen, Services reimbursed after a $50 de- 906 coverage; no maximun durable medical equipment, etc., ductible each year to $10,000 life- limit* prescribed by GHP physician. time maximum limit, F Mr. Barry Evans -3- July 30, 1980 As you know, Group Health Plan's prepaid dental program was re- evaluated last ` year and coverage changes were made on each group's annual renewal date which enabled the Plan to continue quality care to its dental members at a reasonable monthly cost. Because of misunderstandings, we agreed to delay these changes until the end of the cu "Trent contract term in your group. These changes will now be implemented. Monthly dental rates on the renewal date will be $10.23 for employee only coverage and $29.85 for employee with dependent coverage. A brief explanation of the dental benefit changes follows: SUMMARY OF THE PLAN'S DENTAL BENEFIT AND CHANGES Contract Provision Change in Coverage Regular and Diagnostic and Preventive Services No change, covered 100% 1. , Oral examination, diagnosis and treatment • planning. 2. Bite -wing radiographs (x -rays) , full mouth radiographs, and diagnostic radiographs. 3.-Prophylaxis (cleaning) _ 4. Topical Fluorides and pit and fissure sealants. 5. Oral hygiene instruction diet counseling and other preventive services. Restorative and Dental Treatment Services 1. Restorations ( "fillings ") using amalgam, composites, and other customary restora- tive materials. 2. Oral surgery, including simple and complex extractions, and other oral surgery. 3. Surgical and non- surgical periodontic treatment (for gums and tooth-supporting tissue). 4. Root canal therapy. 5. Restorative crowns and other prescription restorative items such as jackets, inlays and onlays, when necessary. Prosthetics 1. Fixed bridgework 2. Full dentures 3. Partial dentures Orthodontia I Changed: Previous coverage 100 %; coverage now 80% with a 20% member copayment . Co- payment due as work is com- pleted. Changed: Previous coverage was 100% of dentist services with member responsible for laboratory's charge for den- tal device; new coverage is 50% of all services and costs with a 50% member copayment. Copayment due as work is com- pleted, No change, covered 50% to $500 lifetime. MEMORANDUM TO City Employees Cove , ^^d y Group Health Plan FROM Finance Director �• {�,,�� -- RE Option for Additional Benefi { DATE July 29, 1980 PLEASE TAKE A FEW MINUTES TO READ THIS MEMO AND COMPLETE THE ATTACHED SURVEY FORM BY AUGUST 5th. Recently the City was advised by Group Health Plan that an additional benefit option could be added to our group plan when the policy is renewed on October 1, 1980. This option consists of outpatient mental health benefits of up to 20 visits per year at a cost of $10 per visit, The additional monthly pre- mium for this option is $.47 for single coverage and $1.89 for family coverage, GrouD HealttT*-Plan believes this is an important and worthwhile benefit. However, the City has the choice of whether or not to include this " benefit in its roux contract. Therefore, your opinion on this matter i s being solicited to help decide whether this benefit should be added. Please check the appropriate box below, detach, and return to my office no later than August 5th. C - I am in favor of add ing the outpatient mental health benefits. I am opposed to adding the outpatient mental health �.._. benefits Employee Signature (optional) TRAINING APPLICATION 7iame G' Rndors r:i._... Posit ion �"-�` 1110d cl..� Rejected Department ate -C / P t • r and hours);�° �4 Date and Time: Length (days .offered y : f thle& Is z o e"I ao- Co . Title and Location of Trainin • Action. by Council :, • � discussed with and approved by This training h ben discus p . my immediate supervisor yes no training which would be supported by the M reason ' _for applying for , g � Y f work) is: Maplewood C b tuition payment or time of City of Map Y _ • Date Signature of Applicant • 'n in m budgets yes no Funds are available for this training Y g • will be covere Yes no using his /her absence. The above individual's workload v a rove d Approved Not App Department Head Date 0 0 x - If not pproved, reason: m O i�+ �U 01 f� i.l Approved Not Approved Director r Personnel Date If not approved, reason:- -` JL CITY FIRE' OEPaRTmeir OF 602- W. S�conQ SL • OWUM M ne=ta ASA02 Behning DULUTH 21 Chw r LUM FAR" C=f a =encAr Workshops PZessa out and return wLtIr you= Mzist=atioit fora. Save the sezand capg for your retard: (Tw* da".) Tfiursda oct:,. 16�-,, L trs 4.3� F t* attend*. the 7r: pr.�, ba Qc�C IT, �:3� t� LL:34 6= hour workshcvs� a.ar� fa 110wins war op(s.) L. Fits Gxoua& CA==& nd- check (04 11►11. �.1�. •.r.���.�M.� � • 1�1�►� �� I� �.1• ! •• • ��1• •�.�rI11 I / Z- Fire Lnspection /C'ada M fo=ement........... ! ... • 40 .. Fire Depa 1�aagemeuFzi�er for Chicfs'�....... - {wit -�G day) � Ago" 1� Etidar, octobe= 17,. 8:3a car . X a:ar.. - 3 hour and. _ I hem uoricshaos 4.. Bisasta= Flaaanf a fo= Fire De p artmenfor W`.................. ......... hours 3~.. edema; Pesticide' Fix" .....0... oil . ft, ...... .. .. ..............................� Izours; firer Departaaeat Budge= _ T`. Firms chief aad: tf .........4Mw4M0.. 00.... W1'' sous& I hours Fri" r, October IT, 2: W to 5 :0 .ae-.. - o far a r3�cs hog Assembly. II a tteud eew - whY : Traln 0f .......... �.... ............................... ♦............I hour Dez 7f UX the Media..................._... �gie�eatiag a Pub Lit Fire Ed ••-.•� ...... «...•........ �• Pz' ogr=.......................... L how Taturdar Octobe= Mp lar: ocr t* t LL.30 a.m. �Ta�st s Workshop what da ym kmw about what .== chi fef does r • Varkshov Re fstzation rnfo=stiaa Mott: Registsati= for the 6 hour wo F�fo ricshops�, Fire Ground d :ad. TimIan ecti L will. be accts t ed oa 1 an Thu =s p oa/Cod day These whQ re gin tar am Friday mar choose Erase owe a f . Disaster dLiag Pesticide F th& following_ planning; ires or Fite Degartm Budget s td Chf of be • P of the r. the Law or. the Oct. 17 Fire D e t Mau •. &&=esttI - v for Chiefs Ftagsaa� Thuzsd 1.:30 -1 :55 October 16 aftern0cm Fire D a F eat or F October 17 morrtin 1: S5 -Z:2Q t p S' 8:30 -5 : SS Posts and Budg � Z: 2fl -2:4 5 .. Rules /Regul.a a . 53 - 9:20 Resources. Z: 45 -3; 00 Coff eee 9: 20- 9: 45 Maas 8 i ng . t:h e Fire Scene 3: 00 -3: 25 Fire Chief ehe � 9:45 - j0:00 _ Coffee 3: ZS -3- .5o Fire Service Contracts io: oo— io• • � Mutual. Aid • 3:50a4:15 4:15 Get tin vi S Along th Gover�ieat 10 : 25 -10 : 50 14:50 Records/Reports Q ues t i aas / ,en � . .,• - 10 - : 1 5 -I1: Fire Freventf an 1 '`� ` • �' CITY DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPAR o':�•` f ��'��= 602 W. Second St. •Duluth, Minnesota 55802 Gerald T. Behning o . _ , •. j.dG�• _ �:�y, 218/723 -3200 Chief • ..:....... • DULUTH C . T �-- S TT a t 4- .• r d 71 L e r �.r �-~ e ou o tct��re C_iefs uoy Terence cep r` .�_ ., .. 1 = r1 '? �" T T • t, !� t ^ e U an �++- ti./ .1. '•v 1 i.. V �ulut��., -s' .- =eso�a, �c�cce: e r aG.Ctla+ term's *rill �e ���e .orL�. r�� : ote.�, • �- ;; �, a� SO e rye Y e�1 �.e ,� �. � ar ,a u - _� �. zT C rve� a of oc�'� c ' = oo s a t t�_e a .i sson • • -� T r �. �t� ce Lai e Ou � --- t n Ou = ..ote1. _6esei at =o__S �..1_ .� r • n .y1.•.� t 1i ^ 1.� G C. V e r e c e:- r e b s V " ='rte hote ��r-- ��.. 1 �,�e ����1�. core tom. t ,:. f,,i V .. 1. _ \.' _ . �} - • •�GC %: -_•- rr s r , O r eCe J� .:. e1� t. a L1C O Q.C� one r �./ ►.. J �. �l � V r � i gh, t T e o off'. rate . . �a �lon s x � . UC. Please complete the tr 1 ��rr n -�' r� ' 0r e con ference e r enCe ar en c.�o s e re cz atioi o +�. _ . , . e ��ror =Ts i�cs zn� return. to. us as soon as lob �.E. � T conference pro a aepen.s a . great lm � successful � �, .� on 1_� ' . Your help In earl,, re +sprat_ c.e al on pZ ann r c . W * 11 be appreciated.. * ald T.L . Behnin � , Cl-li F uth = ire Den artme r ♦t enc1osur es : 4 . An Equal Opportunity Employer PROGRAM Wednesday, October 15 .r 6:00 p.m* 9:00 p.m. Registration - Normandy Hotel • $70.00 Thursday, October 16 7 :30 a.m. • 4:30 p.m. Registration - Normandy Hots! 8:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. Past Presidents /Board of Directors Breakfast 9:00 a.m. • 11 :30 a.m* #.. MSFOA Board of Directors Meeting 10:30 a.m. - 12:00 noon MF50A Board of Directors Meeting 11:30 a.m. • 1:30 p. m. Great Lakes Chiefs ( Lunch -Dutch ) 1:30 p.m. 4:30 pm. Workshops 1. Fire Ground Command 2. Fire inspection /Code Enforcement ' 3. Fire Department Management /Primer for Chiefs 6:30 p.m. - 8:30 p.m. Presidents Reception - Normandy Poolside Friday, October 17 7:30 a.m. • 4:30 p.m. Registration - Normandy Hotel 8:30 a.m. • 11:15 a.m. Workshops 1. Fire Ground Command - continued 2. Fire Inspection /Code Enforcement • continued 3. Fire Department Management/Primer for Chiefs • continued 4. Disaster Planning for Fire Departments - 3 hours S. Handling Pesticide Fires - 3 hours 6. The Fire Department Budget - 1' hours 7. Fire Chiefs and the Law • 1� hours 12:00 noon - 1:45 p.m. Awards Luncheon • Men & Women Speaker - to be announced 2:00 p.m. 5:00 P.M. Workshop Assembly • All Attendees _ Why a Training Officer • 1 hour Dealing with the Media - 1 hour Implementing a Public Fire Education Program • 1 hour 6:00 p,.m. 9:00 P.M* Vendors Night - Normandy Poolside Saturday, October 18 7:30 a.m. - 8:30 a .m. Registration • Normandy Hotel 8:30 a.m. • 12:00 noon Annual Meeting President Gordan Vadnais, presiding Robert T. Palmer, Parliamentarian Presentation of Colors I Address of Welcome • Chief G. T. Behning Welcome to Duluth - Mayor John Fedo Great Lakes Division President Oliver Davis . Introduction by W. A. Reimer,, Vice President, Great Lakes Division Greetings from Can - Am Representation William T. Stewart, Treasurer, Intl. Assn. of Fire Chiefs A. M. Thorimbert, Fire Commissioner of Manitoba J. T. Coulter, Chief, Winnipeg Fire Department j Fire Marshal, South Dakota President, Saskatchewan Assn. Fire Chiefs Assn. Chief, Thunder Say, Ontario ..�. _., 4...... ��-.. _...�....- ..,....i.w.r......► -+ ..,.a ...i. »+vas.. � ...._._.... ,...... _.� __..._._. , ... �r f � • Saturday, October 18 (continued) 8:30 a -mo • 12:40 noon Secretary's Report • Lyle Robinson President's Report • Gordan . Vadnais State Department of Public Safety - Commissioner Sopsic -= State Fire Marshal's Report •Wes Werner ; F. i . R . E. Center; Univ. . of Minn. Report - _ Antona Richardson - . - National Fire Academy - Jack Henrici, Regional Representative Governor's Council on Fire Prevention and Control • Lyle Robinson MRFAA Report • William Nelson • 911 Emergency Number Update -Andy alum • 1 2:00 noon - 1:30 P* M. Lunch • On your own Annual Meeting Continued 1 :30 p.m. _ lAAI , Minnesota Chapter Presentation ' FI AM Report - W. Quirk State Department of Education - Cleo Keiper State Fire Department of Education Fire /Rescue Advisory Committee • L. E. Lowinske Committee Reports: Policy • Richard Kosec Legislative • Orville Mertz Emergency Medical Services • Jerry Renchin Auditing • Lyle Robinson Fire Fighter Safety /OSHA • Floyd LaCuyer Education • Don Johnson Fire Code • W. Reimer Membership • Wayne Schumacher State Fire School • Howard Anderson Communication • Francis Bauer Old Business New Business 5:30 p.m. 6:30 p.tn•. Attitude Adjustment 6:45 p.m. 8:30 p.m. Banqu Dance 9:40 p.m. - 1:00 P.M. a. } � 1 f1 J Guest Room Reservation Request Arriv�at Gate /4 Oepartu�e /O - � /9 r g� Name AZ .S� � cJ4�t' Spouse c.�C9hr� G Telephoner ? � G So 0 Address A7. F 92 /� � .���° � City WdA 1 Gv oo � State �ir n 23R Department/Business Af't3liaticrt /w rt�� arc yars�i' •o TYP OF ACCO MO CATt o NS: Normandy Hotel One Two. Person Persoms Rollaway $SO.00 Reg _ 0 $43*Sa $48 Sa ExKing x.04 . 4T.5G $Sze5o Person � Lakeside � $ otter: Radissonr QI i rfces~ are~ subject M 8% , sales. tax. pr. m.. check-win n• time --Z 2 noon check-out t��me.. P on space avail bass ONLY.. Ali s edal req uests will. be =nftrmed � � MEMORANDUM TO City Manager - FROM Finance Director RE Budget Change - Revenue Sharing Audit DATE September 8, 1980 Recently he s ecial Revenue Sharing Compliance Audit was completed. Origi y p as i this audit was anticipated to be done in 1979 and money w ncl uded in the 1979 Budget to finance it. However, due to scheduling problems, the audit was not done until 1980 and consequently there is no money in this year's budget to finance it. Therefore, it is requested that the Council approve a transfer of $1,820 from the General Fund contingency account to finance the special Revenue Sharing Compliance Audit. t • ' �i p MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development , • to Zoning n Code - Residential Estate Di strict SUBJECT: Amendment 9 Action DATE: June 24 1980 Request End 1 . - - -- �.....�_...�.......,.... Amend the C it y 's Zoning Code to establish a Residential Estate District. Pur ose low famil ne from subdivisions which wou To protect large l ot single . y 9 , • ter w the remainder of the neighborhood. re�su.lt �n l out of c haracter ' summary of Exi s ti n Co • - re 10 000 square feet of area and The minimum lot req i n an R 1 zone a q f frontage , dependent upon whether it is an interior or 75 feet or 100 feet o corner lot. Past Actions . � i . tabled the establishment of a January 15, 1976. ' The . City ty . proposed to encourage Council ra e y District. The zone had been p g Residential Estate Zoning to develop environ- ers to utilize i ze the planned unit development approach , develop concern was that the proposed minimum mentally sensitive areas.. The Council's . y 0 square feet had the potential of being counter - lot sizes of 20,000 and 40,00 q d otherwise • i.e., driving u productive dry v g p the cost of housing and idling 1 an ready for development. • d that Staff research the possibility April 1 17, 1980: Council requested of lot area of P ial Estate Zoning District, with a minimum establishing a Resident onsideration of. a proposed feet, This re uest was made after Council c 20,000 a .q lot division for Voya P i l eti ch in the large lot ne ighborhood west of Keller Lake, along Arcade Street. A • fami resi denti al nei ghborhood • prese makes no distinction among single fa y City Code prese y he character of a neigh- • regarding n minimum lot area requirements* rements . T in R -1 Zones, eg 9 In the instance of established borhood is often times influenced by lot site. tee h1a lewood property owners presently have no guaran large lot neighborhoods, P over time - F ei hborhoods will l retain the large lot characteristics that their n g • »ar factor i n their decision on to characteristics which may have been a primary y property urchase . P P • this zonin would be used f eels that there w� f 11 be few ne ighborhoods where g � Staff e • increase rease the minimum lot area for the ma�ori ty of .This s zone ng i s not intended to c appropriate for unique lots in the City, but only where Council feels t s neighborhoods. I a Residential Estate District, property owners can Through the establishment of • ce that their 1 arge lot neighborhoods w ill remain intact be g� ven some as s uran over time. _ Recommendation • ial Estate District as follows: Zoning Code to include a Residential . Amend the City's 919. R- E,Resi dence Estate District enhance the character of single family 919.010. INTENT. To protect and nee hborhoods is substanti al ly 1 arger than requi red i n R -1 , 9 , composed of to (single dwelling) Res idence Districts �i tted i n a R -1 , Residence District 919,020. PERMITTED USES. Any use permitted (single dwelling) s . a ccessory use p ermitted in an R - , Residence -_ 919.030. ACCESSORY USES. Any acce y P Distri (single dwelling) permitted in a R -1, Residence 919,040. SPECIAL USES. Any special use p District (single dwelling), except: 1. Used car lots • s including the sale of used cars 2. The wrecking of automobiles or truck 9 3. Mobile Home Parks 919.050. DISTRICT STANDARDS. • 'mum lot area shall be deter 1. Mi mum Lot Area. The m mined by the � to 20 ,000 , • the time of rezone ng , but shall be lim . City Council at base their deci s ion r 40 000 square feet. The Council sh all 30,000 0 � q " an existing neighborhood on the character of developed lots Within ed character of lots i n an undeveloped area. or on the desired Hated on the Zoning um lot area requirements shall be designated Minimum , . R -E (30) , st ma i n each R- E Di s tri ct s ti tl e, e. g ands ng for a . , - • P • 000 square feet. Once established, shed, any minimum mum 1 of area of 30 , q ' rement shall 1 be t to Chan y ct s minimum lot area requ� . reques e a di s tr 9 processed as a request for rezoning. • for R -1 Residence District (single 2. Minimum Lot Width, As required red dwelling) • 3. Minimum Setbacks, As required for R -1 Residence District (single , dwelling.) • for R -1 um Building Height. As required o , Residence District 4. Maxim 9 (single dwelling) • i to an R -E zone shall be all buildable 1 dabl e 1 ots before the rezon ng . 5. Le g y r rezoni to an R -E zone. considered buildable of to 9 Y Q l NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING CODE .:� . • that the Maplewood ewood City Council at their Notice � s hereby given p of Thursday, September 18, 1.980 a r�eet� ng , t 7:30 P.M. i n the Council y Chambers o p f the Map lewood Municipal Building, located at 1380 Frost Avenue will consider and receive all public remarks regarding an arae n dme n t to establish a Residential Estates District (R-E) The Residential Estates �- District will establish minimum lot sizes of either 20 30,000, or 40,000 square feet. Additional information on i s available at the office of Community Deve 1 opment, 1902 East County Road B ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER ARE INVITED TO ATTEND AND BE HEARD a C ommissioner Pel l i sh moved-an amendment to condition 1. J nsert a. of the rel imi nar 1 at in l i e u of the words "chain l i n k fence" . . or such Other suitable methods as the Director of Community Services approves Commiss Whitcomb seconded Ayes all Commi s s � - Voting on the motion as amended: Ayes - .9 Nays - 1 (Chairman Axdahl ) + f E. Zoning Amendment - RE District S ecretary Olson said the p urpose of the amendment is to establish y P P a zone that would provide protection for larger lot, single family neighborhoods from subdivision, which would result in lots that would be out of character with the neighborhood. Commissioner � y He 'n asked if the residents in the area of Keller Lake had requested this type of zoning. Secretary Olson said this is a result of the public hearing on Mr. Pi Teti ch's property. Chai rriian Axdahl asked - if there was anyone present-who wished . to comet. ent on the proposal . Gordon Grant, 2134 Arcade - Street, said he- was in favor of the proposed ordinance. Maria Larsen 2001 Duluth Street, said if this is to protect existing large 1 of properties she would be in favor of it. She does not want it restricting lot sizes so people of low and moderate income could not build in Maplewood. - (Mrs . Larsen is representi - .the Maplewood HRA) Ron Owens 2010 Arcade, spoke regarding the development of 1 arger lots for single family homes Carl Biebi 9 h &user, Arcade Street, was in favor of the proposed ordinance for larger lots. 2130 Arcade thought it would be appropriate to-use the Voya P� lets ch, � 9 larger lot requirements just in new development areas. Not in areas where some of the lots are al ready at th a 10,000 .square feet. Commissioner Barrett roved that the P1 anni n Commission recommend to the _ _ Cit Council a royal of the ro osed Zonin Code Amendment for the establishment of an RE Residence 'Estate District as outlined in .Staff's report dated June 24, 1980 Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes - all F. Rezoning - East of Arcade Street (R -1 to RE) Secretary reta Olson said this is a proposal for. rezoning to RE, Residence Estate District for the area east of Arcade Street. �r M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Manager FROM Director of Community Development A� �i�r ��Y' �' � I SUBJ ECT : Rezoning LOCATION: West of Keller Lake, East of Arcade Street E:;� ^1 APPLICANT: Council Initiated = _ DATE: July 30, 1980; Request Rezone an existing larger lot single family neighborhood from R -1, Residential District (single dwelling) to R -E (30), Residential Estate District. Site Description Location: Refer to enclosed mans Parcel Size: 35 acres, consisting of 32 lots with a median area of 41,730 square feet. Lot areas range from a low of 11,250 to a highr of 110,300 square feet. Existing Land Use : 27 single ngl a fami homes and accessory bui l di ngs . Two existing parcels, 2150(A) and Lot A, may be develop- ed under present minimum area requirements. Proposed Land Use Single fami dwellings and accessory buildings. The minimum lot area for future lot divisions would be increased to 30,000 square feet. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Highway 36 Easterly: Keller-Lake Southerly: Ramsey County Open Space Westerly: Arcade Street. Across the street, single fami dwellings and a park, zoned R - 1, Residential Di strict (single fami and planned RL, Residential Low Density. Past Actions 1, December 21, 1972: Council approved a lot division for Mr. Harmon at 2138 Arcade, resulting in two lots of about 1 acre in area each. These lots have since been recombined. 2. August 1975: Voya Pi 1 eti ch applied for a 1 of division which, would have created a 14,000 square foot lot. Although smaller in area this 1 of was to have been located on the same site as Lot A (see enclosed: Property Line Map). 3. September 18, 1975: Council tabled Mr. Pi 1 etich's request until staff could prepare an overall development plan for this area. 4 Y 4. November 20, 1975: Council adopted the following policy for development west of Keller Lake, east of Arcade Street,, north of Rosel awn Avenue, and south of Highway 36: Minor additional development will be permitted limited to using existing streets and requiring full compliance with exist- ing City Codes as to lot width, area, frontage on improved streets, and similar requirements. Council then voted to deny the proposed lot division, due to the fact that the proposed lot was smaller than is predominant in the area. Counci 1 added that they would be willing to consider a lot division making that lot a somewhat larger one. 5. December 4, 1975: Council approved a lot division for 2140 Arcade, creating lots of 41,730 and 40,170 square feet. 6. May 20, 1976: Council .: approved a lot division creating a lot of approximately 30,000 square feet in the southeast corner of Mr. Pi 1 eti ch's property, presently 21282 Arcade Street. A deed was not filed for this split. 7. January 18, 1979: Council approved a lot division for Voya Pi 1 eti ch , creating a lot of 16,500 square feet at 2128 Arcade. 8. July 27, 1979: Staff approved a lot division for Voya Pi 1 eti ch at 20281- Arcade , creating a lot of 26,140 square feet. Council had approved a similar split for approximately the same lot on May 20, 1976. 9. April 17, 1980: Council conditionally approved a lot division and variance for Voya Pi 1 eti ch at 2130 Arcade Street, creating., a 35 ,000 square foot lot without direct access to Arcade Street. This action was subject to the following conditions a. Payment of required cash connection charges b. An easement shall be provided to access the parcel c. A recordable deed shall be filed against the remnant parcel that would quit claim the right to build without specific approval of the City Council. A deed has not been recorded for this lot. 10. April 17, 1980: Council requested staff to research the feasibility of establishing a Residential Estate District, with a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet for the neighborhood east of Arcade Street and west of Keller Lake, 11„ June 25, 1980: Staff approved a lot d i - v i s i o n for Voya Pi l eti ch , creating a - 20,430 square foot lot north of 2128 Arcade. (See Lot Von enclosed Property Line Map.) Planning 1. Land Use Plan Designation: RL, Residential Low Density, not to exceed 14 persons per net acre. This neighborhood has substantially less density than allowed because of the long, narrow lots. _2.. I a 2. Zoni ng : R -1, Residential District (single dwelling). The minimum lot -size in this zone is 10,000 square feet. 3. Housing Plan Policy: a. Page 31 (Proposed Plan), Maintain and where necessary strengthen the character of individual neighborhoods . b. Page 45, All housing should respect established housing values of the area in which it is located to the degree that human values, natural beauty and urban amenities are not sacrificed. c. Page 48, The community should develop land-use regulations which encourage a planned approach to housing areas by providing a variety of lot sizes and housing densities which complement the areas land use plan and the MOM desired dwell i ngo types . 4. Code P r o v i s i o n s : Section 915.030 . of City Code states that where the "aovern- i na body is re u i red to cons.i der an exce ti on or change i n the Zoning ordinance or reap in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance, it shall , among other things: 1. Assure itself that the proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance 2. Determine that the proposed change will not substantially change, injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or of an is adequately safeguarded 3. Determine that the proposed change will serve the best interests of the Village, the convenience of the community (where applicable) , and the public w e l f a r e . " Citizen Comments Staff surveyed the 30 property owners who would be directly affected by a re- y P P zoning. The survey suggested 30,000 square feet as a minimum lot area for future lot d i v i s i o n s in the neighborhood. Of the 19 responses received, 16 or 84% were in favor of increasing the present minimum lot area. Of those in favor of an increase, 12 agreed with , the suggested 30,000 square foot minimum, one felt that 20,000 square feet would be more appropri- ate, and three felt that 50,000 square feet would be a minimum more in keeping with - -_ - -- the -- existing - character Citizen comments received were: prefer a larger lot area. than 30,000 square feet remaining g undeveloped land is not suitable for development and should be P preserved for w i l d l i f e a minimum of 30,000 square feet would ruin this area, reduci na it to a development area the minimum lot area should be no smaller than the average area (46,550 -3- P square feet) of existing lots An increase in minimum lot area is needed to preserve the character of the existing neighborhood the suggested minimum is way too large - a 300% increase in required size is unreasonable The main objection to this rezoning comes from Voya Pi 1 eti ch (2130 Arcade) . He has-proposed to divide his property as shown on the enclosed map titled proposed property . 1 i ne map (1980). The lots proposed by Mr. Pi fetich would all be over 30,000 square feet and would, therefore, not be affected by this rezoning. Mr. Piletich' -s objections to the rezoning creates some suspicions that he is actually i ntend ng to develop the enclosed 12 lot p l a t he proposed in 1978. Ana 1 ys i s The primary issue in considering a rezoning of this -neighborhood is -whether or not it is in the public interest to protect the neighborhood's existing large . lot characteristics. Of 19 potentially affected property owners, 16 agreed that an increase in minimum lot area was not only desirable, but necessary to protect their investments over time. For example, since 1972, the City has approved seven lot splits in the neighborhood. Three of these requests involved the creation of lots less than 30,000 square feet in area, ranging from 16,500 to 26,430 square feet. If the minimum lot area requirement remains at 10,000 square feet, approximately 16 lots have the potential of being created. If the minimum were to be increased to 30,000 square feet, the potential for additional lot creation would be reduced to approximately 4 lots. The following parcels would be involved in the creation of these lots: Additional Lots Minimum Minimum Address 10,000 Square Feet 30,000 Square Feet 2190 1 1 2150 (C 2 0 2140* 2 0 Lot 6* 10 3 2080 1 .0 16 4 *Improved interior access must be provided An increase in minimum lot area appears to be consistent - with City policy calling for the maintenance and strengtheni nQ of the character of exi sti nq neighborhoods* Finally, the Council has adopted a policy that only minor additional development, which utilizes existing streets, will be permitted in this neighborhood. An increase in minimum required 1 of , area would be consistent with this policy. Recommendation Approval of a rezoning from. R -1, Residential District (single family) to R -E (30) pp 9 Residential Estate for an area bounded to the west by Arcade Street, the north b Y 9 Y . Hi hwa 36, the east by Keller Lake and the south by Ramsey County Open Space. r This recommendation is based upon the following findings: The proposed rezoning i s consistent with the intent of the RE district 1. T e p p .. . - • proposed 9 The ro osed char e will protect and enhance the character of the existing neighborhood 3. The proposal is i n the public interest as it is consistent with City policy J 4. A minimum lot area of 30,000 square feet is desired by a majority of the affected property owners surveyed Enclosures Location Map Property Line Map Division proposed by Mr: - Pi 1 eti ch (1980) Proposed Plat (1978) -5- L36 ' -dV LA R K li e - R D. ELDRIDGE, BELMONT L A. AV SKI MAN F MT. AVE VERNON AV z ba O AVE. LWOOD AVE. I L o,t e r -- �_.� _ � o Ar a =� N KOHLMAN A Imo."_. ... � ti � `/ r .Ia► �-/V r ��� r Q � r�� � 2 V1 - RO AD Q r. � .' J �" N Z C OUMTY 22 z O .j AVE to Z -Z C= • K iNG�J J T QN AV E. AVE 4 IF 6 57 581 ST. PAUL R o u Und Lake .. CITY COUNCIL PE TITIONER ZONE CHANGE RE QUEST �CQUNTY [LELANQJ C] t�a � o JUN.�TI N A F VE LOCATION MAP CITY COUN CIL PETITIONER _ r REQUEST - w 2200 . mss" \ ...... • s-� 2190 � ADDRESS _ _ LOT AREA • ' '' `�� KELLER ' 2200 33 ,540 sq. ft. .r _:_ ::__ • �• LAKE 2190 98 2180 87 • 218U 2170 22,220 1•L 2168 15 it ol 2160 72 - - 217U 16 m , �� I - � ••• "4 2158 21 ..• •• �... -2160 ,.;.;.. 2150 11 • ' l ,, t• ; 2 ' � ••* • •w� Tl 34,560 22 2150' ,., ' , ,.. 19 at�'`` • w'=,• : 2144 33 ,520 • ,� - 2144 .. ' 2142 , 41 730 9 • Q o� "2140 ` 1 , 2142�t- ,. 2140 40 170 • s t tT 2138 82 - ? 213 8 ° t ;,Z� i � . -- , _ •• 2134 83 ~- 2130 68 �:... 2134 ; �',� i� �_ 2128% 26 r A 20,430 . • .q .. • , X130 '''' �; B 110 _ 2128 16 • �' 1' 2126 47 N r 2112 47 - /04 .i o o 2100 76 21282 2090 60 2126 2080 39 , 640 ., 2 0 � 06 53 580 , _ ;2112 " ., '� • / 2050 36 21'0 0 ' 2048 43,560 2020 43 200"" - ���; , 2010 60 • 2008 20 _ .. 2060 w. ; ... w - ' • •• • - • 1,489,650 sq. ft. . tt � '.Aw• 20 o'nv.. T • ►T nr Rt . ... 20j TOTAL LOTS — 32 0 s•••• ti 2010.. IDA: MEDIAN AREA 41,730 sq. ft. - '2008 :,., t MEAN AREA 46, sq. ft. to ' r ..III• �� --, � CITY COUN CIL PETITIONER _ r REQUEST • c ono oZO cb li e. Ito :. .� 21 A Jam✓✓ ' .. r , ` � t � 0 - • • ` �Cd a%j•�t � � G 1 C �• i el 4!1' _ j; • ;� '•�`' 3 ` PROPOSED SPLIT LINES • � ::�?�:i;?4:��: =: :tip '• :• .•, fit;:::::: • •''• : :'� : •.tiff . :'/y1•.. ti....ti•. : ::•: •.�: •r COUNTY ROAD 6 •:? 1 1 1 : .... ,:_:..... ... tv �:ti :•.•::::.::•:: �•:: •y:::: . 050 : ` o;'•:�;. ;:.;tip;:::::•::: ?t:; ::: W lob • . cc c � tL" Vic Q - t1 - I.O� o.c. • � oto X12 . O'L o l f� 3 • v • • i • o • - 463.5C IL SG h .�1 o..c ' 0 LLSo.a. 40 IV SOD o . ds �►t. 37 woo v . CITY OF ST. PXV L 4, *� w COUNT1 OF PLA MSE`f v _ ono D&6 VOYA PILETICH PETITIONER RFOt IF • L E IZ I-- 1} V- E IJJ 0 . 1 CxxA=::;rjW14TLIr k LOIE t::r.>Jm ISE W17A? I INE or L e 213o ior PROD. L Ott I IY6 4 a. ys AL 14f 3 L IJ6 `--- A RCA DF 5 T r 3 a VOYA I rICH Ito. .04) PILETICH PETITIONER, 4EQ • applicant's proposed future Plat (1978) 1 Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment on the proposed zone change Property owner at 2134 Arcade Street, said he wished to keep the area unique. He was in favor of the 30,000 square foot lots. . .Ron Owens, 2010 Arcade, is against applying the RE district to this neighborhood. He would not l i k e to see his property being restrict to prevent 20,000 square foot lots. Mark Fenner, 2128 Arcade , thi s i s - a uni que area some action has to be taken beyond the 10,000 square foot minimum. He questioned if Mr. Pi 1 eti ch could explain his intentions development of the property, Voya Pi i eti ch, 2130 Arcade, discussed the past divisions of his property. He also said the right -of -way has been dedicated to the . City for the street. He�said the plat that was presented to the City was developed as a result of a request by the-previous planner for ' the City. At this time, he does not propose - to pursue the plat and develop the plat. He was not in favor of the new zoni ng district or the proposal to change the zoning on his property to RE District. Mr. Bi ebi ghauser, reviewed some of the history of the property in the area. - Mr. Grant said they do not wish to have the area develop into a piece-meal division. Commissioner Ki shel said because of the area being unique, he i 9 q � s in favor of the R -R (30),zoning district Commissioner Kishel moved the Plannin Commission recommend to the Ci t Counci 1 rezoni n of R -1 to R -E 30 for an area bounded to the west by Arcade Street, the north _ by Highway 36, the east by Keller Lake and t he south by Ramsey County Open Space, Ihis reco mmendation is based upon Ahe fol 1 owi n . f ndi n s 1. The proposed rezonin is consistent with the intent ' 9 nt of the RE Distri ct 2. The proposed change will protect and enhance the character of the existing neighborhood 3. The proposal is in the-public interest as it is consistent with Cit p olicy. is City y 4. A minimum lot area of 30,000 square feet is desired by.,a the affected of t d ec a property owners surveyed. Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Commissioner Pel 1 i sh Said the establishing of the R -E (30i district for this area would not prevent further platting of the property s lo as it y 9 would meet the minimum requirements, Voting: AY es - a11. 6 8 -4 -80 ;i f t .: MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS 7:30 P.M., Thursday, August 21, 1980 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 80 -5 A. CALL TO ORDER A meeting - of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Chairman Nelson. Be ROLL CALL Earl L. Nelson, Chairman Present Norman G. Anderson Present Gary W. Bastian Present John C. Greavu Present Frances L. Juker Present C* APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes No. 80 -4 (May 1, 1980) Councilman Anderson moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 80 -5 (May 1 1980) a.Q 'rnrrAntarl Page 3, Item D -2a - Chairman Nelson. Seconded by Councilperson Juker. Ayes - all. Do PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Lot Area - Frontage Variance - 396 E. Viking Drive - Pilarski a. Chairman Nelson convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the re— quest of Mr. Joseph Pilarski, 296 East Viking Drive, for a lot area and frontage variances to allow a division of a double fronting corner lot. The Clerk noted the dates of publication and stated the notice was found to be in order. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. CIO Chairman Les Axdahl presented the Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Pellish moved the Planning Commission recommend to the Board of Adjustments and Appeals approval of the lot width and area variances to colate two 75 foot by 115 foot corner lots at 396 East Viking Drive, provided that sewer and water cash connection charges are paid for the Lark Avenue frontage. t The recommendation to approve this request is based upon the following: 1. Strict enforcement of the Code would be an undue hardship because the cir- cumstances are unique to the applicant's individual property; am 1 " 8/21 l t l 2. The proposed use of the property is consistent with the Land Use Plan and Zoning district for the area; 3. The neighborhood's planned density will not be exceeded; 4. Precedent has been established in the immediate vicinity for 75 foot wide corner lot; 5. A nonconforming double fronting lot would be eliminated. Commissioner Sletten seconded. Ayes all." d. Mrs . - Pilarski, the applicant, spoke on behalf of the proposal. e. Chairman Nelson called for proponents. None were heard. . f. Chairman Nelson called for opponents. None were heard. g. Chairman Nelson closed the public hearing. h. Councilperson Juker moved to approve the re nest of Mr. and Mrs. Jose h Pilarski for lot width and area variances, to create two 75 x 115 foot corner lots at 396 East Vikin Drive, rovided that the sewer and water cash connection charges are paid for the Lark Avenue frontage and based on the recommendations in the staff report. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. E . , ADJOURNMENT 7:41 P.M. City Clerk _2 _ 7/21 :j MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Lot Width Variance and Variance to build a home wi - thout Improved Street Frontage . LOCATION: Unimproved Cope Avenue = APPL CANT: Bryan Lenz 014NER: Charles Humphrey DATE: September 10 , 1980 Ell Request Approval of two variances: 1. Lot width variance. The applicant's lot is 60 feet wide. Code requires 75 feet of lot width. 2. Unimproved street frontage variance. Code does not deem a lot buildable unless it has direct frontage on an improved and maintained street. Site Description 1. Lot size: 17,700 square feet 2. Existing Land Use: Undeveloped. Proposed Land Use 1. Refer to the-applicant's letter. 2. The length of the applicant's driveway along unimproved Cope Avenue would be 100 feet. 1.3. Some conditions have changed since the applicant has applied . for these variances. The applicant has since decided to move his house onto a vacant l.ot on Harris Avenue, near Prosperity Avenue. The applicant is still interested in pursuing the variance, though, in order to make it buildable for. sel 1 i ng purposes Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Undeveloped lot planned for RL, Low Density Resi oenti al and zoned for r R -1, .Single Dwelling Residential. North of this lot is Highway 36. Southerly: Undeveloped Cope Avenue and single dwelling homes 1 Easterly: Undeveloped property planned for RL and • zoned DC, Business Commercial. East of this property is the Maplewood water tower Westerly: Undeveloped property planned for RL and . zoned R -1 . Past Actions 5 -1 -80: Council approved a variance for Keith Libby n I having to construct = three houses ear 494, on property not have ng street fron to e . A t • that: 9 Ap proval was Lon the bas 1. - There has been a hardshi p � p the applicant, because the acqui si ti on of the abutting land to the south by se Ram. Count • reduced Y Y Open Space, has substantially the feas� bi 1 � ty of developing ng a public street into property; o the applicant's P Y� 2. The spirit and intent of the ordinance wi 11 • be met if the applicant provides a paved driveway along the existing right-of-way and a • g y green to maintain �t. Approval was subject to the followi g condi ti ons. . • a I. The applicant shall install a aved d riveway - - p ay on the e ng right -of -way tot he specs fi ca ti ons of the City Engineer; 2. The applicant shall sign an agreement to maintain • the drive to the C� ty Standards, including snow plo��i ng. Thi s agreeme 9 nt shal be recorded to run wi th the property. I f applicant cant does not maintain the drive he sha forces a � 11 be assessed �f City re used. I f the drive i s expanded to a City Street the applicant forgoes any previous agreements, reeme . y 3. Construction of any additional homes on this r ui re rement f P operty must meet current requirements or platting, ng. The length of Mr. Li bby's dri veway was in excess of 550 feet. 4-20-78: Counci 1 ' approved a variance for Larri e He i nzen to cons a house on unpaved Idaho Avenue according to the following conditions: 1. Dri veway to be located ted • Y on the .west side of the lot; 2. Dedication of 20 foot road easement on Idaho Avenue to allow for the future construction of a cul-de-sac bulb 3. Owner agrees not to request reimbursement f • or the cost of the driveway located on the street easement 4. Applicant agrees to the above conditions in writing. This pproval was based on the unl i kel i hood of . the compl eta on of Idaho Avenue The 1 en . gth of Mr. Hei nzen's driveway along uni m p roved Id - 9 p Idaho Avenue _i s about 20 feet. r 10- 20 -77: Council denied a variance for Mark Kocourek for a house on unpaved Burr Street, north of Kingston Avenue, on the basis that: 1. There may be times of the year when emergency p ublic c safet se r vices Y P y vices coul d not be provided, such as police, and fire and ambulance to to a lack of snow plowing or an unstable road surface. This would open the u t potential law suit p Y Y p o P s. 2. This application does not meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance. 3. It would establish a dangerous precedent for future cases.- Mr . Kocou rek ' s driveway would have been about 300 feet long. Planning Considerations 1. Land Use Plan Designation: RL Low Density ' ' n ity Res�dent�al. 2. Zoning: R-1, Single Family Residential 3. Section 501.020 of the City Code states that "Nob ' building permits will be issued for. any construction within the Village unless the building s . site is located adjacent to an existing street which is dedicated and maintained ned as a Village street, or unless provision for street construction coon has been made in full compliance with this code and in no case unti 1 radi n work a 9 9 s provided herein has been completed and certified to the clerk by the Village Engineer; except that in isolated i nstan instanc the C ouncil may enter an agreement with a property owner for special handling of an unusual situation which agreement with the land affected . " shall be recorded so as to run g 4. Section 1005.010 (1) of the Platting Code states that to be buildable a lot must be at least 75 feet wide at the building setback line. The maximum width of the applicant lot is 60 feet. 5. Section 462.357 Subdivision 6 2 of the State S ' prov i des � ) tatutes that the Board of Appeals and Adjustments has the power to hear requests for .variances from the literal r g provisions s� ons of the ordinance i n instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardshi because of circumstances unique: to the individual property under co p p y c derati ons , and to grant such variances onl when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent oft he ordinance. Public Works Considerations I. Sanitary sewer is not available. 2. Water is available. 3. Cope Avenue is not s needed for transportation on ' • • p reasons . There � s. , however,, cFevel opabl e land abutting i t. I t i s possible , therefore that a devel o • .0. per night, i n the • future, petition to have Cope Avenue cons tructed. . Refer to the letter from Hillcrest Development dated September 5 19800 3 Public - Safety 1 . Delivery of Public Safety services is difficult di r when the lot does not have direct street frontage. 29 I f approved, the driveway. should 1 d be paved and maintained. T Other Considerations If the applicant were to connect to sani tar • - es must b y sewer some day cash connection charges e paid. Analysis State Code requires that variances not be ranted u ' 9 un ess � t has been demonstrated that confor rmance to code would cause undue hardship because of circ umstances uni que to the property Also i t umstances . y must be shown that variance will be i n keeping with the sp t and intent of - the ordin The - � applicant has not expressed a hardshi p i n this case, but on ly a des i re to bui 1 d here . Staff feels that development of this l i s rema P tore. If Cope Avenue was constructed there would not be any need for the variance for ' unimproved street -frontage. The lot width variance, h owever, would still 1 l be needed. Staff also feels that issuing va r ia nce • g i ance for lot width i s premature. The adjacent parcels are presently undeveloped and of substantial wi dth . It may be poss therefore for the applicant to acquire an additional 15 feet from either side, Re commen da ti on Denial of both variances based on the findings that • 1. It has not been demonstrated that conformance ' to .code would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the . ro ert P P y 2. It has not been shown that the variances ces would • i r , be � n keeping wi the s p i t and intent of the ordinance. 3. Development of the l ot at this time would be premature si Cope Avenue may be constructed, thereby precl ud ng the need fort - he variance for unimproved street frontage.. Also, since the adjacent lots are un evel oped, and of substantial lot width, it may be possible for the • appl i cant to acquire an additional 15 feet of lot width to attain code compliance 4. Approval would set a precedent for allowing • additio onal homes to be built t al ong this unimproved right - of - way. Enclosed: 1, Location. Map 20 Property Line Map 30 Appli letter 4. Letter from Hi l 1 Gres t Development dated September 5, 1980 4 v i t � WOODLYNN A F N UR ESS CT. L(DI L AYE, LYDI A o }" z Q o RI a-� � � WIK't'r � lTAtvD Ily . n MAPLE LANE Y _IL s - llEAIA E I MAPLEVIEW AV (I.) MAPLE (3.) CHIPPE X 0 W ~ NORTH ST. P V F.: > W OHLMAN AVE. w KOi4 LMAN AVE. ROAD cy Q 23 :� ' 2640 N. _j _j W � - .J w t7 . = Z EDGEHILL RD. W as Q < Z � _' 65 4n - DEMONT u. AVE- _ < �•- W ROOK 4VE.� 0 _ _ Jr �• W AV - + I I th AVE. • - -, � � SE SMJ I A -_ AV E. QVVAIS i AVE - 2400 N. G � ANDVIEw F AVE . ` - - - - - - ' 36 VIKI OR. CasTIE AV bm&r AF SHE R•RE N AVE ` COPE AVE.ER EN AVE. C E A V�• LARK AVE. ♦,; LARK AVE. ►- y vi > R LAURIE R ° a p � °• = cc LAURIE RD 25 = < _ �. Cr � _ = AVE. W W 65 ... 64 Z Q =j WW < _ 25 _ I l! > 2160 ; ul RICE 6U C A -JI If ELDRIDG � AVE. �- - -- t4 y � +�+lAR.E R• - W �E L M N v W W PUBLIC WORKS R ) ti) STANICH CT. > o T A VE. 64 > BLDG. .� AVE u SKILLMA N m AVE. = MAR Rls .� SO O -D i ROS MOOD AVE. R Y A N h r q r �! 0 •� �► 29 AVE 28 1 HOLLO 5 �... .. .. S R A W -- a 1 ac .. Fl F F W /' 1 W J PETITIONER Lenz Location' fyiap 1. Vari ance =:Un improved S et 2. Variance- Frontage - - REQUEST T30NR22W `4 4 3 TZSNR22W BEAM w AVE. a RAQATZ 0 0 6 !1` -L I ITS T -�� ;� { ,. Ell? � r ` T* �0PE----- i �- LE LY- IlL roll • �� ` ''� %moo _ • 6 , W e- va Z-24 ROAD i ! ' j � .. _ ��- x',11 + _ — AV E PETITIONER Lenz - 1 Vari an**ce-Un improved Str REQUEST 2.Variance-Frontage Propert Line Map' Ain!k)l i IT I ! I i ► 1 !st He i36- `�i� I I I ,J L,<,4 -- -! - - - l J �� J- -.L j If- F T- �TT t t t NU RSIJ I I 1 -1 n ME s/ I f --T 4 -T T T T T T T -L I ITS T -�� ;� { ,. Ell? � r ` T* �0PE----- i �- LE LY- IlL roll • �� ` ''� %moo _ • 6 , W e- va Z-24 ROAD i ! ' j � .. _ ��- x',11 + _ — AV E PETITIONER Lenz - 1 Vari an**ce-Un improved Str REQUEST 2.Variance-Frontage Propert Line Map' Ain!k)l i To City Council i e bought some land we thought it was on frontage road castle ave th ats where the sign was so we had a surveyor warren I. Forsberg go out there it took about a week f or him to mark the land . I was out there doing a percolation test and I found the surveyor . Stakes the land was not on the frontage road it eras on cope ave my lot is one hundred feet from inproved road ex ai g place, We would like to use cope ave as are driveway we realize we have to have driveway wide enough for emergency vehicles and keep snow cleared in winter time We wish you would consider us to use cope ave as are driveway y we bought the two storie brick house. 2010 white bear ave from rams ey county the movers are. going to start 9 -3 - so you see we can not start intell we hear from you ramsey county wants the house out of there 9 -18 -80 Thank you Bryan Lenz 263 South ave No. St. Paul t � 770 -6785 � ✓ -A Al - _ � . to �� ���� L R E S EVELOPMENT September 5, 1980 EXECUTIVE AND ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES METRO SQUARE 7TH AND ROBERT St. Paut Minnesota 55101 Phone: 224-5811 Area 612 Pei - J.� ��� /��r5l�y�� ��: S � .^ lY.i� Pf Maplew ood Board of Adjustments and Appeal s 4�4 H1LLCHt9Ti'SHQPF J;�-CENTEAet 1380 Frost Avenue St. Paul, MN 55109 �HOVE -EL1:-ftA9,T___ YW Dear Sir: ej t ffinescas Za a We are in receipt of y our not i fication of public INN HEM W'SOUAK . e hearin for code variance ance on a parce 1 of land near 1 oils -UR - C ra 3_ -� Street and Cope Avenue* The petition initiator i s Br R an Lenz. -AKEr-S �n 0 We have no objections to his re with one VIKING.VILLA J7 TMr-.NM--- except - ption We would re t hat if his petition _ 5 ; E 7 �4 F__ -is g ranted it be g ranted sub *ect to the condition sk 'N A.. f;;*%x-jC_._._VV..ri-:3-.! that should we, at a later date, petition to ha ve - L EM MOUST M& Cope Avenue extended and improved he would not P object. We would appreciate it if y ou would ifif orm us as to the action taken at y our September 18 meetin - �_3_ At Thank y ou. Sincerel HILLCREST DEVELOPMENT �-- � ,- iAS_ /��A!ya � }mi �iC r Yv� N .� t IBM 7 VIR& 14 190-TAROMe" :`4 S, ;AR Ernest F. Christianse V . P. Construction ICIM a kh 01t,71F 1� EFC: 4_ _ " LL . eoff Olson NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR CODE VARIANCE The Maplewood Board of Adjustments and Appeals will conduct a public hearing on Thursday, September 18, 1980 at 8:00 P.M. i n the Council Chambers of the Maplewood Municipal Building, 1380 Frost Avenue. PETITION INITIATOR: Bryan Lenz 2613 South Avenue North St. Paul, MN REQUEST: To build a house on a land locked parcel i with substandard frontage PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS: East 1/2 of Lot 5 and all of Lot 4 and East 112 of Lot 26 and all of Lot 27, Block 10, Dearborn Park More Commonly described as a 60 X 267 foot parcel located north of the unimproved Cope Avenue right-of-way, between Craig Place and Germain Street. ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER ARE INVITED TO ATTEND AND BE HEARD If you have questions or would like further information call Geoff Olson at 770 -4560 .1 .f MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community WCATI Ofd : 1292 Kohl man Avenue APPLI CANT /OWNER: Richard Wahlqui st SUBJECT: Lot Division and Area Variance DATE: August 8, 1980 i .[ .." J i tal l by C Y Re uest Approval of a lot area variance and lot division to create two residential ' lots. Site Description Lot Si ze : A 1.03 by 201 foot corner lot, consisting of 20,703 square feet. Existing Land Use: A single family dwelling and detached garage. Proposed Land Use A 125 by 103 foot corner lot and a 103 by 76 interior lot, consisting of 7,828 square feet. The interior lot would be sold for single family residential development. Surrounding Land Uses North: Kohl man Avenue. Across Kohl man Avenue, single ' family dwellings,, zoned R -1, Residential District (.Single Family) and planned for RL, Residential Low Density East: English Street. Across English Street, single family reside - nces, zoned R-1, Residence District (Single Dwelling) and planned for RL, Residential Low Density. South: A single family residence, zoned . R -1, Residence District (Single. Dwelling) and planned RL, Residential Low Density. Infest: The rear 9 and of a si n 1 e fami ly resi dence, zoned •R -1, Resi dence Y District (Single Dwelling) and planned for RL, Residential Low Density 1 Past Actions Pre -1960. An 80 foot wide lot, consisting of 8,256 square feet, was created two lots south of the applicant's. A single family dwelling and garage pre- sently occupy this lot. - P1 -anni ng 1 Land Use P l a n Designation: RL , Residential Low Density 2. Zoni ng: R -1 , Residential District (Single Dwelling) 3. Dens ty: Code allows 14 persons per net acre. The density in the vicinity of the proposal 'is presently 10 persons /net acre. Development on the proposed lot would increase the neighborhood density to 11 persons /net acre. 4. Zoning Code Requirements: Section 1005.010 states that the minimum lot area for a single family detached home is 10,000 square feet. 5. Statutory Requirements: Section 462.357 Subdivision 6 (2) states that the Board of Appeals s and Adjustments i s empowered to hear requests for variances : o pp J P from. the literal provisions of the ordinance in instances where a. strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property b : where it i s demonstrated that such acti ons wi 11 be i n keepi ng wi th the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Public Works 1. Sewer and water are avai 1 able. 2. The proposed lot is low and w i l l require filling prior to development. The City Engineer En i should approve a drainage plan for the lot prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. A cash 'connection p n charge i s payable. able. for 15 feet of frontage along English . Street. Citi Comments surveyed Staff P 16 property owners with ' in 150 feet of the subject parcel. Of a y p p the seven responses received, .four objected to the proposal. The respondents who were opposed, objected on the basis that English Street is already too. over crowded and that development on the southerly 16t will intensify existing ndi hborhood drainage e probl ems .= The property owners abutting the applicant's g 9 property to the west and south both oppose the proposed lot division 2 Alternatives 1. Approval of the Area variance and lot division. �sion. Two lots would be created. The interior lot would have adequate fro ui rement q nta e, but would not meet the minimum area requirement. . The corner lot wou d but code. _ 2. Deny the area variance. The ro osed lot division • - = No development p � vi s� on would- be prohibited, ted. elopment of the southern portion of the a l ' pP � cant s property would be allowed, unless the applicant could expand the area of the ro os d southerly lot to meet code. To accomplish i sh p p e p t his the applicant woul Y have to acquire additional land to the west • or relocate his existing garage to the north. The property owner to the west i s ' sell the required i red 30 f unw� 11 � ng to • q . s moving the garage. feet of property to the applicant. As such the only option i ' Analysis The subject property is large enough to divide d • g e into two lots., both of which under ordinary ci rcumstances would meet minimum frontage and area requirements. The problem, in this case, i s that the loc a . c t� on of the applicant's .existing garage , prohibi is the creation o,f lots which would meet Code. I n essence, the issue is whether or not a requirement to relocate the garage would constitut an undue hardship. e Both lots, as proposed,would meet minimum frontage requirements and would be compatible with existing developed lots fronting on ui rements g English Street. All setback requirements . would be capable of being met as well. The proposal consistent -w ith - dense t established p posal would also be y requirements equi rements by the. Land Use Plan. Further- more, requiring the applicant cant to relocate the e gara would d not ' or bu ' g . appreciably enhance the livabil . i 1 dabs l i ty of the interior lot. In short the to as proposed, meet the i ntent of the Land U s is Use Plan and Zoning Code. As rel ocation of the garage is not necessary to meet the intent of the cod ' to relocate the structure would constitute e, a requirement � tute an undue hardship. , Recommendation Approva 1 of requested area variance and l division, on the bas is that: 1. The proposal is consistent with the Land . Use Plan 2. The proposal meets the intent of the Zoning Code 3. Requiring the relocation of the garage would ' in th' � g g consti tute an undue hardship �s case 40 Strict enforcement of the Zoning ode would n -� l i vab i g of appreciably enhance the .l i ty or bus l dab i l i ty of the proposed interior l ot, ot. Approval is contingent upon the fol 1 owing actions 1. Payment of a cash connection char - ge for 15 feet of frontage along Eng lish g 20 A drainage r o Wage plan for the proposed lot - r . p • P • must be approved by the Ci Engineer pri to issuance of a bu i l ding permit. 47 Enclosures: Q 1. Location Map 2. Property Line Map 3. Applicant's letter of justification, dated July 14 1980 4. Applicant's attachment to Board of Appeals Application-dated Jul 14 1980 5_. App l i can ti' s Site Plan y 4 VADNAIS HEIGHTS (61 0 0 BEAM AVE. P / ar 4L - COUNTY ROAD T 605 is T30NRZZW •34 4 'T29NR2" C BEAM AVE.. Koh Imon. Ir Lake > or 41 0 LMAN AV uj KDHLMAN —4 cr X: 23 r,004TY OAD > LA I W W Cr LL) CL E D EHILL R Ir 65 Z cc x Lu A V E W Ju DEMONT R "O�K 22 -AVE.2 Cr w AV 61 L��T fwT L E j GERVAIS � AV E. QERVA AV G �ANDV�IEW VIKI A I- E A SHE R RE N AVE K 0 P-E AVE. Ke I/ e r C OPE AVE J LARK AVE. r LAR K' AVE ARK AVE. 25 D. CO Y'Cyl 2 [ I LRD. j � 25 = ����Q Z Ix RD z L E L AN 1) IF 49 Z. 65 cl b z * f , j 4 iul� E•. ki 0 u K E' 1Z AYE, U RK I . 1-: -ELDRIDG .j AVE M 114 APU W8 00 WORKS ELMON 0 PUBLIC 0:1 AVE > 64' S f N 'PETITIONER walquist Lot Split/Area Variance R EQUEST Locati'o.*n Ma.p Imo■ r 44 t r 1 oc� t9 e ` 61 f A c1 40 e3� i . ---r- - -- — -- - -- -- -- - �� 29.5 - -- -- - -- , P i •- 1 ��, , -;� ,, l 6 s • t i 1 �, ; � ! 4 , � ; 2 Cf J. VE KOHLMAN � / 160 .• � � o c n• / Y i aC 1 n , :::•:. I V, ti ° 1 �' 1 i - F(,�Vp i15• .d 1 • ,a` � ( ( r j 66 3 O S O ' rq (( { III C) uu C i ' 1' ,i . to G,' 6G I .e}q I boo' `t' 14 1 5v ' 3�► ' 13Y 1031 3�• 4v •r 14 �C. 32 � '71 1 1s.Z9.38• �. c.'4. G� PETITIONER "Walquist Lot Split /Area Variance REQUEST Property Line Map .: N N July 14, 1980 City of Maplewood City Hall - 1380 Frost Ave* Maplewood, MN 5-5109 To: City of Maplewood, My wife (Athena) and I live on a double lot at 1292 Kohlman Avenue. We have no need for the area behind the ,garage on English Street and would like to have that part of our lot split -off. We .no longer want to maintain that parcel of land nor do - we want to pay taxes on it. This lot has city water, sewer, and natural gas already in place. My brother was recently discharged from the army and my wife and I would like to help get him started in the housing market. We feel that splitting -off this piece of land would be extremely beneficial to his situation. Thank you for considering this request. Sincerely, Richard ' A. Wahlqui ,1 u Athena M. * Wahlqu ` t ATTACHMENT TO ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION I'm writing this statement on behalf of my wife y(Athena) and myself-as required for Zoning Code Appeal under rLmber 5-. be = ti 5. be 1. Even though we live on a double lot (200.51 x 103.3), strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of the location of our garage which would have to be moved to -comply with the Zoning Code. 2. The lot, which we would like to split -off, has city water, sewer, and natural gas already installed. In the past six months, two new homes were built on English Street directly across from.the lot which we would like to sell* This new construction further solidifies our belief that this variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance and would be consistent with the character of the neighborhood. Additionally, the frontage would remain above the required minimum width and since there are no dwellings located in . the area behind the proposed lot, we would not be obstructing a view or overburdening any adjacent property owners. METRO TITLE CORPORATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION DATE 201 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 PHONE (612) 222-1775 FIEF NO. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR A CODE VARIANCE s s s The Maplewood Board of Adjustments and Appeals wi conduct a public hearing on Thursday, September 18, 1980 at 8:15 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Maplewood Municipal pal Bui l ding, 1380 Frost Avenue, PETITION INITIATOR: Richard Wahlquist 1292 Koh 1 man Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 REQUEST: Approval of a l area variance to create a residential lot PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS: 1292 Kohlman Avenue ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER ARE INVITED TO ATTEND AND BE HEARD If you have questions or would l i k e further information, call Geoff Olson at 770 -4560 P s r f� D. Variance - 1292 Koh lman Avenue (Wahlquist) Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting approval of a lot variance and lot division to create two. resi denti al lots. Staff is recommending approval as outlined in their report. i i Richard Wah l q ui s t, said they did ask the - adjacent ro ert : owner to p p y purchase a 30 by 75 foot strip of land so this lot. would meet minimum square footage. The owner did not wish to sell any property. They f e l t that movi the garage and driveway. would not make an appreciable difference in the l i v a b i l i t y or bui l dabi 1 i ty of the lot. He had talked to the Engineering Department regarding any possible drainage problems and what their requirements were, . Commi ssi oner S 1 etten moved the P 1 anni n Commi ss i on recommend to the Board of Adjustments and Appeals approval of the proposed variances on the basis that: 1. The proposal is consistent with the Land Use Plan. 2. The proposal meets the intent of the zoning Code 3. Requiring the rel ocation of the garage would constitute an undue hardship in this case 4. Strict enforcement of the Zoning Code would not appre ably enhance the l i v a b i l i t y or bui 1 dabi 1 i ty of the proposed interior lot. Approval is contingent upon the following actions: 1. Payment of a cash connection charge for 15 feet of frontage alon 9 English Street 2. A drainage plan for the proposed lot must be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. (As a deed restriction) Commissioner Howard seconded Ayes - all C. Revenue Note - Carlton Racquet Club (Continued) Chairman Axdahl asked how many new jobs this faci 1 i ty would create. Mr. Bonestroo said they believe there will be three but there w i l l be more with the partti me help, Chairman Axdahl asked if staff sees any probl with developing the property because of its unusual configuration. i Secretary Olson said they have not reviewed a site 1 an et�. P y . Commissioner Whitcomb moved that the Planning Commission r " .. to the City Council approval of the Commercial Revenue Note Finance, on the basis that the project meets all the criteria outlined by the City Council, Specifically, the proposal would: 1. Be compatible with the planned use and zoning for the site 2. Not require additional publi expenditures for roads sewers or water mains i MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: PROJECT: DATE: City Manager Director of Community Development Commercial Revenue Note Financing Gervais Avenue, West of White Bear Gervais Associates Mini Storage Warehouse Facility September 10, 1980 __ Request Avenue AcEion by rrdcr. s_ ho):: i ::.... Re j. Date_ Preliminary approval for tax exempt revenue financing in the amount of $900,000. Site Description 1. Lot Size: 140 by 580 feet, consisting of 81,200 square feet. 2. Existing Land Use: Undeveloped Proposed Land Use A mina- storage warehouse with 269 storage units, consisting of 37,900 square feet. Projected annual sales for the facility are $138,000 and projected annual payroll is $30,000. Five persons are to be employed. Construction is to begin as soon as possible. Surrounding Land Uses North: Gervais Avenue. Across Gervais, undeveloped land zoned LBC, Limited Business Commercial and planned LSC, Limited Service Commercial. East: Saints North Roller Arena South: Highway 36 West: Undeveloped land, zoned M -1, Light Manufacturing and planned LSC, Limited Service Commercial Past Actions March 20, 1980: Council granted preliminary revenue note approval =for a min - storage facility proposed by F.E.D. Investments at 1195 East Highway 36. Pl anning { 1. Land Use Plan Designation: LSC, Limited Service Commercial 2. Zoning: M -1, Light Manufacturing 3. Policy Criteria from the Plan: "Limited Service Centers - this commercial land use plan classification recognizes that a wide range of cb service activities exist and are desired which should be limited as to location, Function, mix and quantity. Further, such centers should be planned and .developed under performance standard techniques which . are designed to more closely integrate such commercial activities into the land use pattern in such a manner that concern is given to the overall environment impact of such activities to surrounding and adjacent land use." .4. Code considerations: Section 911.010 (12) of City Code states that warehouse uses are allowable in Light Manufacturing Districts by special use permit. 5. Existing Criteria: A. The project shall be compatible with the overall development plans for the City B. The project shall not require a significant amount of public expend- itures for City improvements such as roads, sewers, and watermains C. The project shall involve a business of a nature that the City would wish to attract or an existing business that the City would desire to expand. D. The number of businesses of the same general nature in the area of the proposed project shall be considered in determining the need for commercial revenue note financing E. The City financing of the project shall be limited to the issuance of a single mortgage revenue note to be marketed as a private placement F,. The applicant shall sign a memorandum of agreement providing that they will pay all costs involved in the legal and fiscal review of the proposed project and all costs involved in the issuance of notes to finance the project. G. The.City reserves the right to deny any application for financing at any stage of the proceedings prior to adopting and resolution authorizing the issuance of a note S. proposed Revenue Note Criteria i A. Definitions (1) Existing Business shall be defined as a presently operating industry or commercial enterprise with at least one year of operational history within the City (Z) New Business shall be defined as any industrial or commercial enter- prise which does not qualify as an existing business. I i B. Project Eligiblity Guidelines (1) The project shall be compatible with the overall development plans of the City, including the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning, and Community Design Review Board Standards. .(.2) The project shall not require a significant amount of public expenditures for City improvements such as roads, sewers, and watermains. (3) The project shall involve an existing business that the City wishes to expand or a new business which the City wishes to attract: a. Existing Business Criteria Any expansion, relocation, or rehabilitation of an existing business shall be eligible. b. New Business Criteria 1. Offers at least 400 man -hours per week of new employment on a year around basis, and 2. Possesses a low potential for creating pollution, or 3. The project involved the rehabilitation of a vacant or scheduled to be vacated structure or 4. The proposed location is within a designated development or redevelopment target area (4) The number of businesses of the same general nature in the area of the proposed project shall be considered in determining the.need for commercial revenue note financing. (5) The note shall be for an issue of not less than $500,000. C. Application Processing Guidelines (1) City financing of the project shall be limited to the issuance of a.single mortgage revenue note, to be marketed as a private place- 7 (2) - Final approval shall not be granted by the City until the project has received approval with respect to Zoni- ng,.site design, building design, or platting. 3 Financial Considerations S The applicant has signed an agreement to pay all costs involved in the review and financing of the proposed project. Commercial Revenue Notes do not constitute a charge, lien, or encumbrance upon any property of the City, except the project and would not be a charge against the City's general credit or taxing powers, but are payable from sums to be paid by the applicant.. = Ana -lysis The-proposal is consistent with the intent of the Land Use Plan and Zoning Code. However, the issuance of a special use permit is required before the applicant can proceed with the proposal. .Public expenditure will not be required for this project. The business will add to the City's tax base, but would provide only five full and part -time jobs. A mini - storage facility with 450 to 500 units has been approved by the City 1 112 miles to the west. No other such facilities exist in Maplewood: commendation If Council approves the Planning Commission's,proposed criteria, the revenue note applicant should be denied on the basis that there would be less than 400 man -hours of jobs provided. If the proposed criteria are not adopted, Council should approve the revenue note. Enclosures: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line Map 4 �Il II RA p41 r1 KUHL NAh A \R� w ll <I' . Y v' N.A BOUNTY /' I II Ro4C j Z � � lI 1 w I ., OGENILL RC rl 3 J DE NON LL; AVE T � _m w a 15E xtt N AVE CEn VA 15 AV C. I v'I GEF \'41E V`vING D j / q J IL LHN ! AV� lCS LOUNiY OI�� mI FIE LANC IF .1 SN ERFEn A" I El! AVE I LA__ \4RE Av',� w LARK AVE. 6 UNRC TIOK AVE i � 7 AVE j -- ORE AVE I L I I PETITIONER Gervais Associates REVENUE.NOTE Location Map REQUEST AJE �� 1 l :l 0 b ' m y _ AJE �� 1 l :l 0 b 11 0 If . I II ----------- i cc: <1 PETITIONER rervais Associates *REVENUE NOTE. REQUEST 0 I A r\j ----------- i cc: <1 PETITIONER rervais Associates *REVENUE NOTE. REQUEST 0 P r MEMORANDUM -tl TO: City Manager _ FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Commercial Revenue Note Financing LaCATION: Beam Avenue, South of Maplewood Mall APPLICANT: United Artists Theater Circuit, Inc. .Action b� C J � PROJECT: United Artists Movie Theater DATE: August 14, 1980 Reques Preliminary approval for tax - exempt mortgage revenue fi ng in the amount of $2 Site Description 1. Lot size: 5 acres 2. Existing Land Use: Undeveloped Proposed Land Use A six screen movie theater. The projected annual sales for the theater is $2,125,000 and the projected annual payroll, $156,000. Construction is anti ciated to begin on September 1, 1980 and be completed by May 31, 1981 . Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Maplewood Mall and the Holiday Inn _Southerly: Beam Avenue and undeveloped property planned as LSC , Limited Service Commercial Center and zoned BC (M), Business Commercial (Modified) Easterly and , esterly: Undeveloped property planned for DC, Diversified Center and zoned BC, Business Commercial. Past Actions The Council has previously approved Commercial Revenue Note financeing proposals for businesses such as the Maplewood Square, K -Mart, Wendy's Restaurant, and Hir^schfield's Retail Center to name a few. Pnni ng 1. Land Use Designation: DC, Diversified Center 1 2. Zoning: BC, Business Commercial 3. Policy criteria from Plan: Diversified Center - such commercial land use designation and classification refers to a large concentration of retailing, service, cultural, entertainment, and facilities located within a. relatively compact area,-=and- blended with high density residential development and other related activities p -rovi di ng employment opportunities. The Diversified Center is more than j!us t a shopping center, it is designed and planned to develop as a communit acti vities center composed of dynamic activities -designed to improve convenience to people's needs. The land use plan indicates one diversified center being planned within the communi 4. Existing Criteria: A. The project shall be cQmpati bl e with the overall development plans for the Ci ty B. The project shall not require a significant amount of public expend- , i tures for City improvements such as roads, sewers, and watermai ns C. The project shall involve a business of a nature that the City would wish to attract or an exi s_ti ng busi that the City would desire to expand. D. The number of businesses of the same general nature i n the area- of the proposed project shall be considered in determining the need for commercial revenue note financing E. The City financing of the project shall be l to the issuance of a single mortgage revenue note to be marketed as a private placement F. The applicant shall sign a memorandum of agreement providing that th will pay all costs involved in the legal and fiscal review of the proposed project and all costs involved in the issuance of notes to finance the project. G: The City reserves the right to deny any application for f i na.nci ng at any stage of the proceedings prior to adopting and resolution authorizing the i ssuance of a note 5. Proposed Revenue Note Cri teria A. Definitions _ 1 } Existing Business shall be defined as a presently operating industry or commercial enterprise with at least one year . of operational . history within the City t �) New Business -shall be defined as any industrial or commercial enter- prise which does not qualify as an exi s ng business. . B, Project El i gi bl i ty Guidelines (1) The project shall be compatible with the overall development plans of the City, including the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning, and Community Desi Review Board Standards 2 I (2) The project shall not require a significant amount of public expenditures for City improvements such as roads., sewers, and watermai ns . (3) The project shall involve an existing business that the City wishes to expand or a new business which the City wishes to attract: a. Existing Business Criteria Any expansion, relocation, or rehabilitation of an exi sti ng = business shall be eligible. b. New Business Criteria 1 Offers at least 400 man -hours per week of new employment on a year around basis, and 2. Possesses a low potential for creating pollution,' or 3. The project involved the rehabilitation of a vacant or scheduled to be vacated structure or 4. The proposed location is within a designated development or redevelopment target area (4) The number of businesses of the same general nature in the area of the proposed project shall be considered in determining the need for commercial revenue note financing. (5) The note shall be for an issue of not less than $500,000. C. Application Processing Guidelines (1) City financing of the project shall be limited to the issuance of a single mortgage revenue note, to-be marketed as a private place- ment. (2) Final approval shall not be granted by . the City Council until the project has received approval with respect to Zoning, site design, building design, or platting. Financial Considerations The - appl i cant has signed an agreement to pay all costs .involved J n the review and financing of the proposed project. Commercial Revenue "Notes: do not constitute a charge, lien, or encumbrance upon any property of the City, except the project and would not be a charge against the City's general credit or taxing powers , . but are payable from sums to be paid by the applicant. 3 Analysis J This proposal is consistent with the City's Commercial Revenue Note eligibility criteria. Specifically, the proposal would: 1. Be com p ati b.l a with the planned use and zoning for the site' 20 _ Not require additional public expenditures for roads sewers 'or water mains 3. Provide new job. opportunities and add to the Ci ty' s tax base r Recommendation Approval of the project as being consistent with the existing and proposed criteria, .s _ — WHITE 6 VADNAIS HEIGHTS 61 -- -�'_-- / J COUNTY ROAD 1.0.E I 65> J T30NR22w �- -_ c� t - - II11 )Z-- 7 - ~ � ~ to t!! V KOHLMAN AVE. W a cr a Z V1 ~ V) Z Lt1 ROAD "C" x CD i �• I i tI - r , LINTY f i 1 r . RADAT l i cr3 S J 2 J ~ p � W W z cr W 3 1 EDGE HILL z ; a 2 J _Q c v 2 DEMQJN AVE.w a (BROOK a' ✓E.� - - - ; ~ 0 + m cn 61 3 T29NR ? ?W AVE. BEAM' F � �ojvt.f4oc . Cr W m SEXT NT A GERVAIS AVE. `n LI II GERVAtS G kANDVIEW AVE. 36 F •� l k IN DR. c� SHERREN AVE - -� _ $A I COPE AVE. - LARK AVE. [ LARK AVE. N LAR aV � N ZI COUN LAURIE RD. o < 1 04 L LAURIE RD. W � Q Z L AN O a R I LE, O S A , H T r JA V C�, � 55 o L JUNCTION AVE. z "B ". W Y 64 Q P ¢ AVE LY01 m !' -,r-• z ? � o ,�c Q CL ,. �V7. 4V * J uj Q > W W KOHLMAN AVE. 23 - •_� w M. R0. W Lu Q II to AVE. 65 • :;-- r4A V E. - 36 CaSTL t AVE' COPE AVE. W W .•� N V _ � 325 BU RK = • } 8U KE AVE. m a o ELDRIDG -� AVE O pN y > LSE MON • Ur AVE. W 64 > N 1 . _ SK �N VE u SKILLINA N m AVE. = MAR Lt �- R ,�� r ,._, R I S .500 I SN CK JAVEJ =o AH m I� I 4.� ROS w 000 AV �� � E. wI R T 11A 7 • I PETITIONER Uj3itimd Artists Tbpatpr R EQUEST Revenue Foote Financin Location Map 4 a v I i � ` .,�- + 5 - -- - - - -- ,sr�I n�lx — I ► li 9G• — 1 - ^��f-- --rr -- 41A UPC. "Of"' r ♦r j I I A A. L+ll O)IJ ' ,. 1 ».i ss'w�rss t 1 • 1 I .. All Lea I g r.•tr dWAW& . I t I Or ( I 1 �' vnllvsr rw av+�ue gat! a"r • � ' ( � a � �. w .. • it s�'ir I I f 1 Jw� • :' ; ' l4fT , IN13, Ij �- .t rr !.004.480••' 1 •V I : ;r' -•::v. I i 1'. , try ,r ntlT = .. Ilk b • I v, .;fir' •.wr.a's.:. t -- --- - =_ - -- ' rr � I O j o �' � j � t ( t Ja •r / �s.•...�: ` AO qk NV X r : � ': f �:�:�'�:�: -�: • :�':•:::•: '-:-:�••�•.�' pi , ; I Iti 1 . , 1 � crux ~t��t I i s •yea. :. •• f 4 AL It a "' ' �"� ' � �'�• `� Got ft41 �� •� - ?Z wKRf _�►tit_w c��R r • M •.i :� ► �. j -. . tl•Z 1 s� 130 1,00 Ill,, J3 1 30a,. l ?,.:a • ` al l l (Zi /0� ..= r lap , 1 .... ' ` /1.! :a —'""rte •� � ► - !' ^ •' r • N r vll 1 �. t .�c ITV••'! t >rv�K)t y �. �in1 Q ti tti� PETITIONER United Artists Theat REQUEST Revenue Note Financin ' S7 � / /t .: • •♦ I IJ►• I IVL - - 1 1.�I' � �1:. . ... .. 1•. - S I ..c ► ► J J � � i i p �.• e o K �3� K f f .'11•t � Map 4 a l +i m l APPLI CATI ON AGREEMENT • FOR TAX EXEMPT • MORTGAGE REVENUE 140-FE FINANCING • - �CING This Agreement is hereby entered ed i n t o between the City _ of t�1a > > Minnesota, hereinafter called the �� __ p � -wood , "C ity" a nd United Artists ltzeatre Cir hereinafter called the "appl i cant" . I nc - _ The applicant i s requesting ' el o _ • financing ng for a dev ment project • desri res that the Ci t is no p p J and y tes according to the terms of the Munici Industrial Devel o menu Act' of P - 1967 as amended. I n order for the ' the C - application > ca t � on to be considered b y City, the applicant hereby a Tees to a s e a l and f' 9 P y 11 costs involved i n the l issuance 9 n fiscal 1 revs ew of the proposed project a . involved i n the � p P J and all costs e of said notes to finance the ro ' ect. P J - *it is further agreed and understood that Ci reserves the ri ght to deny any application far fi nancing nand W i n any stag - , : 9 Y t ge of the proceedings pri - or to adopting the resolution authoriz the issua 9 of notes, 1: APPLICNIT: - a. Bus i ness . Fame - United Artists Theatre Circuit rcui t , Inc, b . Business Address -_ 11S Middle Neck Road Great Neck, New York 11021 C. Business, Form- (corporation, partnership, • sole proprietorship, etorshi , etc. Cor p � d_ Authorized Representative - -Mr. Gladstone Whitman e. Tel ephone - 212 . '895 - 7100 Z. MME(S) of 14AJORITY •STOCt;HOLDERS OFFICERS & DIRECTORS, PARTN E RS , PRI a• Robert A. Naify - President & Chairman of the Board b • I:arshall Naif - Chairma • y a n of the Executive Committee, Honorary Chairman of tit Board & Direc to l- C. Salah ti. Hassanein - Executive Vice President acid Director d. A.C. Childhouse -- Senior Vi • Vice President and Director e. Gladstone T. Whitman - Financial dice President and Di - rector 3. 1OCATION OF PROJECT: i -a. names and Location of Adjacent . Southlawn Ro'ad(west) Beam Ave. soy � streets. � C • Ring Road (no b. Dimensions of Property Irregular, g ular triangular - . .Y g g la shape . - Approximate d amens - ions • 570' (south), 755' (west) and 925 (northwest) C. The scale and north arrow: 4. GIVE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE OF BUS I 6 ;ESS Six screen movie theatre with the related sale of . refreshments. f ': 56 MOUNT OF CITY FINANCING BEING REQUESTED: 2 525 000 ' 6. PURPOSE OF REQUESTED FINANCING: Expansion of the United Artists theatre burin • a. Business Purpose to be served adjacent to Maplewood Mall Provide entertainment for the b. Public Purpose to be served - residents of the , trade areas . City of Maplewood and surrounding tr d 7. TUS1 NESS PROFI • as Number of jobs the project will provide after completion - 45 • b. Projected annual sales - $ 2,125,000 c. ro annual p ayroll - $ 156,000 � D. r' NAMES OF: a. Financial al consultant for the business - Juran & Moody, Inc. and Northland Mortgage Compan b. Legal counsel for the business - lames Brehl , esq . 9 - Maun, Green, Hayes, Simon, 'iurray & .Tohanne c. Corporate counsel - Not applicable �• - WHAT IS YOUR TARGET DATE FOR: a. Construction start - September 1, 1980 b. Construction - United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc. - _ - Name of Applicant . Signature f Authorized Representative Ti t1 e Da to T he following items must be submitted with this application: _ 1. A$30o0 f i l i n g fee should be submitted with this application .. 2. A resolution setting a hearing date 3. An application to the Commi ss -i oner of Securities for approval of Muni ci pal I ndus tri a Revenue Bond Project y ou have an questions on items 2 or 3, call the City Clerk, Lucille Aurelius , 770 -4500 f y q . . MEMORANDUM TO City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE Award of Bids - Employee Medical Insurance DATE:- September ll, 1980 It is proposed that the contract for employee medical insurance be awarded to Great West Life Assurance Company for one year beginning October 1, 1 and that the appropriate changes be made in the group life insurance contracts to enable this. - RAC:KGRnttND Since October 1, 1978 Blue Cross and Blue Shield have provided employee medical insurance through the Underwriters of St. Paul insurance agency. Prior to that date, Western Life Insurance Company provided medical coverage through the same agency. The existing one -year contract with Blue Cross and Blue Shield expires October 1, 1980. State law requires that cities be advised of renewal premium rates for employee group insurance at least sixty days before the expiration date of coverage. Consequently, the attached July 10, 1980 letter was sent to the City's insurance agent which indicated that a 45% increase in premium rates would be necessary for renewal of the policy with Blue Cross and Blue Shield. Due to this large premium increase, it was decided to solicit bids for medical insurance. Specifications were prepared early in August and were based upon the coverages presently being provided by Blue Cross and Blue Shield. The bid notice was published on August 13th and copies of the bid notice were mailed to over 30 insurance companies and agencies. Beginning on August 14th the specifications were distributed to those requesting copies. Altogether 23 copies of the speci- fications were given to 12 different representatives of insurance companies and agencies. BID TABULATION On September 10th the bids were opened. The following is a comparison of the present monthly premium rates with the bids and the Group Health Plan rates which employees have the alternative of choosing: Presently there are 23 employees with single coverage and 28 emol oyees that have family coverage with Blue Cross and Blue Shield. The following is a comparison of the present monthly premium with the premiums bid: Present Bids GHP BCBS Crown Great Present 10 -1 -80 Rates BCBS Life West Rate Rate Sin le g $34.13 $ 49.41 $ 45.21 $ 36.35 $ 34.00 $ 34.47 Dependents endents 58.11 84.96 71.91 61.53 64.40 65.82 Family 92.24 134.37 117.12 97.88 =98.40 100.29 Presently there are 23 employees with single coverage and 28 emol oyees that have family coverage with Blue Cross and Blue Shield. The following is a comparison of the present monthly premium with the premiums bid: Present BCBS Rates Bids Crown Great BCBS Life West Single $1,740.63 $2,519.91 $2,305.71 $1,853.85 Dependents 1 2 2,013.48 1,722.84 Family 3 4 4 - 3,576.69 The bid submitted by Blue Cross and Blue Shield was on behalf of the Underwriters of St. Paul Insurance Agency. However, it was indicated that their premium rates would be about 1/ less if the City decided not to purchase the insurance through an agency. The bids submitted by Crown Life and Great West Life were not through agencies. Neither the Crown Life nor the Great West Life bid proposals included the follow- ing items which were required by the specifications: (a) an Equal Employment Opportunity Report which the City requires on all formal bids, (b) a completed questionnaire indicating exceptions being taken to the specifications and ' general information regarding . the company, (c) a copy of the proposed policy upon which the insurance coverage would be based. Also, the Crown Life bid pro- posal did not include the required bid deposit and was not on the City drafted proposal form which included a legal certification of non - collusion. Absence of these items gives the City the legal right to reject these bids as being incomplete and not in compliance with the specifications. However, the speci- fications and bid notice did indicate that "the City reserves the right to ..... waive any informalities in the bid, and to make such award as it may deem to be in the best interest of the City". BID ANALYSIS The bid submitted by Blue Cross and Blue Shield was at the same premium rates as those indicated in their July 10th letter. However, their bid stated that the rates quoted were firm for the current number enrolled and that if there was more than a 10% decrease in the number enrolled "a re- evaluation of rates would- be necessary ". The bid submitted by Crown Life Insurance Company was difficult to analyze because of all the items missing from the proposal as noted above. However, it was determined that in order for employees to get medical coverage through Crown Life, they would have to purchase $5,000 of life insurance at a cost of $2.30 per month in addition to the $45.21 per month for medical coverage. The exact extent of the medical coverage to be provided was not clearly indicated and no bid deposit guarantee was submitted. The bid submitted by Great West Life Assurance Company was the low bid of the three submitted. (This company was ranked as the 13th largest in the country in f979.) Also, their proposal indicated that they would provide medical coverage in the manner prescribed by the specifications. However, their :bid was subject to the condition that $10,000 of life insurance would be required to be pur- chased from their company for each employee they provided medicafl insurance. The cost for this life insurance would be $4.60 per month in addition to the $36.35 per month for medical coverage. Currently, the City has a contract for group l i f e insurance with Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company. This contract requires 100/ participation for _ -Aff. -2- employer -paid life insurance which amounts to $10,000 of coverage for most employees at a cost of $4.80 per month. Also, the contract allows employees to purchase up to $30,000 additional life insurance and $2,500 of dependent life insurance. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company was contacted to determine if they would consent to a change in their contract which would eliminate the 100/ partici- pti on requirement for employer-paid l i f e insurance. As a result of negotiations "it was agreed that they would consent to an amendment of the group life policy which would allow the first $10,000 of employee life insurance be written through Great West Life Assurance Company but only for employees that have medical insurance with this company. Thus, employees that have coverage with Group Health Plan w i l l continue to have all of their l i f e insurance coverage with Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company. Also, employees with medical coverage through Great West Life Assurance Company will continue to have their dependent life insurance and supplemental life insurance coverage with Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company. RECOMMENDATION .It is recommended that the Council: (1) waive the informal ities�in the bid. submitted by Great West Life Assurance Company, (2) award the contract for group medical insurance and group life insurance up to X10,000 to Great West Life Assurance Company, (3) authorize an amendment to the contract with Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company to enable a portion of the life insurance to be provided by the Great West Life Assurance Company. r �v a A ct3cn;�T _3_ Blue Cross.nd Blue Shield of Minnesota a .- 3535 Blue Cross Road P.O. Box 43560 St. Paul, Minnesota 55164 t July 10, 1980 Mr. James Fitzgerald Underwriters of St. Paul Rosedale Towers 1700 W. Highway 36 St. Paul, Minn. 551-13 ,6 j10 l /' 'n ' , 00 General & L ng Distance (612) 450 -8000 Customer Service (612) 456 -5050 Ml Customer_Service (612) 450 -8331 j RE: Renewal of City of Maplewood, Group # GM 454-00 Dear Mr. Fitzgerald: The experience from 10 -1 -78 projected to 10 -1 -80 has been calculated and shows the following needed change in rate. Sin le Famil Present rate $34.13 $92.24 Needed rate (effective 10-1-8-0) $49.41 $ The following experience is used for this rate change. Income Ultimate Claims % _ Blue Cross $55,607o19 $ 121 Blue Shield 23,158e56 2 5 , 883.43 112 Major Medical 12, 615.21 10, 496.37 84 Total $91, 380.96 $103,079e62 113 A discussion with you and the account is requested for the purpose of explanation and options available. Information material is enclosed, T4 Mayor & Council ity Manager ' ncerely, _City Clerk 7 geni' Pul . Safety Director es E . King PuE Works Director Account Executive Comm. Dev. Director IEK/pw Comm. Serv. Director Personnel Director Enclosure other FROM Director of Finance 8` U DATE MEM0RANDUM - T0: - Barry Evans - FROM: = Robert Wenger SUBJECT: Proposed Food Establishment Code DATE: September 11 , 1980 Don La i s has requested that we make the following change in the proposed Food Establishment Code: 806.080 Suspension Revocation (Page 6) Paragraph ; 4 would be changed to read: 4. That the continued operation of the licensed business is found to endanger public health, safety or welfare. Also, there was a typing error on page 12 ('800.260) paragraph 2. The word confirm should read conform.. Action by Council: -EndorS-cd.._..- Modi-i Re j ectc�� Date . rf M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: ' Mananer FROM: Director of Communit Development RE: Proposed Food Establishment Ordinance DATE: Jul 10, 1980 On June 21, 1979, the Cit of Maplewood and Ramse Count si a contract relative to the Communit Health Services" Grant. Under the terms of this contract, the City was to provide certain environmental health services in return for a monetary g rant. One of the conditions stated in Section 6 of the contract re the Cit to execute an- aareement with the Minnesota Department of Health in which the Cit accepts. dele authorit from the State for the licensin and inspection of restaurants and places of refreshment. Prior to the si of this a with the Minnesota Department of Health, the Cit must show a capa6ilit of conductin 'these inspections and have statutory authorit to re and issue orders to these food establishments. The Cit of Maplewood currentl does license the majorit of these food establishments, in its restaurant licenses, but has no comprehensive ordinance re their a 'ivities in respect to food handlin and sanitation. ac tivities Action b Council: Endorsed].— 11 o d -]&L f -i Re ected- 1 Z7 M Date ORDINANCE NO . AN ORDINANCE REPLACING CHAPTER 806 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CONCERNING FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS = THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 806 - FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS ::- 806.010. PURPOSE. The purpose of this ordinance is to establ i*sh standards to protect the health, safety, and the general welfare of the people of Maplewood. These general objectives include the following: 1. Prevent food -borne illness 2 . Correct and prevent conditions- that may adversely affect persons u t i l i z i n g food establishments 3. Provide minimum standards for the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of food establishments 4. Peet consumer expectations to the quality and safety of food establishments 806.020. DEFINITIONS. For the purpose of this ordinance the following words shall have the following meanings: 1. Adulterated shall mean the condition of food if it bears or contains any poisonous or deleterious substance in a quantity which may render it jurious to health; if it bears or contains any added poisonous or deleterious substance for which no safe tolerance has been established by regulation, or in excess of such tolerance if one has been established;* if * i t consists 'in- whole or in part of any filthy, putrid, or decomposed substance or if it is otherwise unfit for human consumption, if it has been processed, prepared, packed, or held under unsanitary conditions; whereby it may have become contaminated with filth, or whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health; if it is in whole or in part the product of a diseased animal, or an animal which has died otherwise than by slaughter; or if its container .i s composed in whole or in part of any poisonous or deleterious substance which —may render the contents injurious to health. 20 + Approved shall mean acceptable to the Health Authority as determined by conformance to appropriate standards and good public health practices 3. Catering Food Vehicle shall mean any food vehicle used to transport any food from its point of preparation to a point where the food is served from the vehicle to the consumer, or any food vehicle wherein food i s prepared for sale or service to the consumer. 4. Clean shall mean free from physical, chemical, and microbial substances discernible by ordinary sight or touch, by ultraviolet light or by artificial light, by the safrai ni ne -o dye test or by microscopic or microbiological examination and free from insects, vermin and debris, 5. Corrosion - Resistant Materials shal 1 mean those materials that maintain their original surface characteristics under prolonged influence of the food to be contacted, the normal - use of cleaning compounds and bacteri ci~di al solutions, and other conditions -of -use environment. _ 6 . Easily Cleanable ' shall mean that surfaces are readily accessible and made of such materials and finish and so fabricated that residue may be effectively removed by normal cleaning methods. 7. Embargo shall mean the with - holding of food, equipment, utensils, or clothing from sale or use in any establishment that comes within the jurisdiction of this ordinance until approval is -given by the Health Authority for such sale or use. 8. Eg.ui pment shall mean stoves, ovens, ranges, hoods, slicers, mixers, meatbl ocks , tables, counters, refrigerators, sinks, dishwashing machines, steam tables, fixed and mobile manufacturing, processing, packaging and conveying equipment, and similar items other than utensils used in the operation of a food establish- ment, 9. Food shall mean any raw, cooked, or processed substance, beverage, water, ice, or other ingredient used or intended for use in whole or in part for human consumption, 10. Food Contact Surface shall mean those surfaces of equipment and utensils with which food normally comes in contact, and those surfaces from which food may drain, drip, or splash back onto surfaces normally in contact with food. 11 . Food Establishment shall mean any building, room, stand, enclosure, vehicle, space, area, or other place wherein food is stored, prepared, manufactured, processed, wrapped, canned, packed, bottled, transported, distributed, sold,- or offered for sale or served in any way with or without charge, except private homes. 12. Food Vehicle shall mean any food establishment consisting of a mobile vehicle which hauls any food for the purpose of delivery or sale. 13. Garba a shall mean discarded material resulting from the handling, processing, storage, preparation, serving,and consumption of food. 14. Health Authority shall mean the City Health Officer or the Environmental Health Official of the City of -Maplewood. 15. Hermetically Sealed Container shall mean a container designed and intended to be secured against the entry of microorganisms and to maintain the commercial sterility of its contents after processing. - R 16. Home Prepared Food shall mean any food which has been processed or prepared in a private home. 17. Itinerant Food Establishment shall mean a food establishment operating for a temporary period of 14 consecutive days or less, including but not limited to fair, carnival, circus, or public exhibition. 18. Law shall include all Federal, State, and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. _ 7 f 190 _ Misbranding shall mean the use or absence of any written, pri - Ated or graphic matter upon or accompanying food or containers of food which yi of ates any applicable local, State, or Federal labeling identification, or representati on .rzq u i reme n is . 20. Packaged shall mean bottled, canned, cartoned, or securely wrapped. 21. Perishable Food shall mean food such as fresh fruits and vegetables and other foods which will decompose in the absence of refrigeration. 22. Per shall mean any individual , firm, partnership, corporation, trustee, or associ ati.on and with respect to acts prohibited or required herein, shall include employees and licensees. 23. Potable Water shall mean water which is from a source of SLTpply and system operated, located_, and constructed in accordance with the provisions of the Minnesota. Department of Health rules relating to public water supply and well water. 24. Potentially Hazardous Food shall mean any food that consists in whole or in part of m i l k or milk products, eggs, meat, poultry, fish, mollusk, edible crus tacea, or other ingredients, including synthetic ingredients, in a form capable of supporting rapid and progessi ve growth of infectious or _ toxi geni c microorganisms. The term does include clean, whole, untracked, odor - free shell eggs or foods which have a pH level of 4.6 or below or a water activity (aW) value of 0.85 or less. 25. Putres c i bl a Material shall mean solid waste which is capable of becoming rotten and which may reach a foul state of decay or decomposition. 26. Reconstituted Food shall mean dehydrated food products recombined with water or other l i q u i d s . 27. Refuse shall mean putresci ble and non - putresci bl a sol I'd wastes, except body wastes, and including garbage, rubbish, ashes, incinerator ash, incinerator residue, street cleanings , and market and industrial solid wastes. 28. Safe Materials shall mean articles manufactured from or composed of materials that may not reasonably be expected or result, directly or indirectly,- in their- becoming a component or otherwise affecting the characteristics of any .t food. If materials used are food additives or color additives as defined -..---in Secto n 201 (s) or (t) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act they - are "safe" only if they are used i n ' conformi ty with regulations es tabl i s.hed pursuant to Section 409 or Section 706 of the Act. Other materials are "safe" only if, as used, they are not food additives or color as defined. in Section 201 (s) or (t) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and are used in conformity with all applicable regulations of the Food and Drug Administration. 3 29. Sani ti zati on shall mean effective bactericidal treatment by a process that provides enough accumulative heat or concentration of chemicals for enough time to reduce the - bacterial count, including pathogens, to a safe level on utensils and equipment. 30. Sealed shall mean free of cracks or other openings that permit the entry or passage of moisture. 31. = Stele Service Utensils shall mean all utensils which are meat for one time, one- person use and then discarded. 32. - Smooth shall mean having an even surface, free of cracks, chips, open seams, rust, corrosion, breaks, pits, checks, and ridges. .33. Special Food Handling Establishment shall mean a food establishment where the only food sold or offered for sale to the public is unwrapped bakery products or candies, canned or bottled beverages, non -peri sabl a machine dispensed beverages, or pre - packed sandwiches, snacks or ice cream novelties which -are heated, served or sold for consumption on the premises or immediate consumption off the premises. This definition does not include the off -sale of liquor or similar bottled or canned beverages. 34. Utensils shall mean kitchenware, tableware, dishes, glassware, cutlery, pots, .plans, containers, implements, or other equipment with which food comes in contact during storage, cooking, processing, preparation, display, or serving. 35. Wholesome shall mean sound, healthful, clean unadulterated, and i n al 1 ways fit for human food and human consumption. 36. Vending Machine shall mean any type of self - service device which upon insertion of a coi n, coins or token, or by other similar means, dispenses unit servings of food, either in bulk or in packages, without the necessity of replenishing the device between each vending operation, and shall include self - service candy displays ;where coins are inserted into a depository in the displaying devi ce . 806.030. LICENSE REQUIRED. No person shall operate a food establishment or . engage in the business of operating any of the following types of enterprises within the corporate limits of the City of Maplewood unless a license for the current year of the applicable type described herein shall have been obtained therefore pursuant to this Section from the City of Maplewood: Food Establishment Catering Food Vehicle Itinerant Food Establishment Non - Perishable Food Vehicle .� Potential Hazardous . Food Vehicle Special Food Handling Establishment Whire the business consists only 9 of a Catering Food Vehicle, Itinerant Food Establishment, Non -Peri sabl a Food Vehicle, or Potentially Hazardo-us Food Vehicle or Special Food Handling, a food establishment license shal 1 not - - be required in addition. 4 When more than five food vehicles of the same type are operated by the same person in the same business in the City of Maplewood, they may obtain a fleet license. I f such fleet license i s suspended or revoked, such suspension or revocation shall affect every vehicle. Any person who has a license from the Commissioner of Agri cul tur-e pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Annotated No. 17.037 (3), ar�d not having a pl aMt located in the City of Maplewood or delivery equipment pri rr pally located i n :the City of Maplewood, shall be exempt from the provisions of this Section. Z 806.040. LICENSE REQUIRED, FEE EXCEPTIONS. Food establishments in and operated by governmental subdivisions, charitable institutions shal 1 be .requi red to apply for and obtain a license, but shall not be charged a fee therefore, but shall be subject to all other requirements of this Section. 806.050. APPLICATION FOR LICENSES. Application for licenses shall be made in writing to the City of Maplewood. Such applications shall specify the following: r 1. Name of the appli cant(s) and if a corporation, the registered office thereof, 2'. The name and address of the location or place of business or activity for which the license is requested. 3. Such ' addi ti anal information or documents as the ordinance or administrative regulations may require from the applicant. 806.060. REVIEW PRIOR TO LICENSE APPROVAL. The license application shall be reviewed by the appropriate municipal officers (Police, Fire, Environmental Health) for review and comment. The Municipal officers shal recommend approval or di approval of the application, and when recommending disapproval, furnish in writ- ing their reasons therefore. 806.070. NOTICE TO APPLICANT. In the event disapproval of an application is reconuended, the City shall notify the applicant of: 1. The nature of the recommendation or acti on. 2. The time and place at which the Council will next consider application. 3. The applicant's right to appear before the Council in support of the appl ication. 806.080. SUSPENSION: REVOCATION. The Council may suspend or revoke any license issued pursuant to the Ordinance if the Council finds that any of the following ever occur; provided, however, that the licensee shal 1 be given notice of the proposed revocation or suspension and be provided an opportunity to appear before the Council and be heard: 11 -That the licensee has knowingly made false statements in or regarding his = application. 2. That the licensee or his agents have violated or failed to comply with Ordinance provisions, statutues, or legal directives pertaining to the regulation of activities authorized by the license. 3. That the licensee has failed to correct or remove, within a reasonable period, ordinance violations after receipt of notice to do so. 5 4. That the continued effectiveness of the license constitutes a substantial threat to the public peace, health, safety, or welfare, 896.090. ISSUANCE. Upon approval of the application, the City of Maplewood shall issue a license to the applicant, stating thereon the name and address of the premises and the activity licensed, r. 806.100. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY REQUIRED. A Certificate aaf Occupancy is required for the conduct of activities for which a Food Establ i sKment license i s required, the license shal 1 not be valid until said Certificate has been issued by -the Building Official, 806.110. LICENSES - NONTRANSFERRABLE , NO REFUND. A license i s nontransferrabl e, and the licensee shal i not be entitled to a refund of any license fee upon revoc- ation or voluntarily ceasing to carry on the licensed activity. However, in the event of Council denial of th r' e application, the fee shall be refunded. 806.120. LICENSE FEES. The fees for the various licenses shal 1 be as is stated in Section 266 and 288 of the Maplewood City Code, 806.130. FAILURE TO APPLY FOR LICENSE. If an application for license renewal is not submitted within 30 days after expiration of *the current license, the licensee shat 1 cease the previously licensed activity. Continued activity after the 30 day period shall be an ordinance violation. 806.140. DISPLAY OF LICENSE. Licenses shall be conspicuously displayed at _ all times in all licensed food establishments. All food vehicles. shal 1 be identified with the name and location of the licensee prominently displayed on each side. 806.150. SANITARY INSPECTIONS OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS. The Health Authority shall conduct sanitary inspections of every food establishment as frequently as they may deem necessary to ensure compliance with this Section. 806.160, POSTING. Each sanitary survey report may be posted by the Health Authority upon an inside wal 1 of the food establishment, not in a public area. The survey report shall not be defaced or removed by person except the Health Authority. The posting of the survey report upon the inside wall of the food establishment shall constitute service of .an official notification of the inspection by the Health Authority. The Health Authority may, in lieu of posting-such report, deliver it to the licensee or his authorized agent. A copy of the inspection report shall be filed with the records of the Environmental Health Official. 806.170. ACCESS TG PREMISES AND RECORDS The person operating the food establishment shall upon request of the Health Authority permit access to all .parts of the establishment at any reasonable time for purpose of survey. . The pe on shall exhibit and allow copying of any and all books of accounts, paper an + ..records relative to purchases of food for purposes of ascertaining sources of-foods, 6 806.1 80. REMOVAL AND CORRECTION OF VIOLATIONS. Upon the posting in a food establishment or the delivery to the licensee or his authorized agent of a survey report which contains a notice of one or more violations of this Section, all licensees, owners , or operators shall correct or remove each violation in a reasonable length of time as determined by the Health Authority. The length of time for the correction or removal of each such violation shall bili noted on the survey report. The failure to remove or correct each such vi of at Pon within the ti me period noted on the survey report shall constitute a separate violation of this Section. X806.190. EXAMINATION, CONDEMNATION, TAGGING. Samples of food may be taken without cost for examination by the Health Authority when reasonably necessary for the detection of unwholesome or adulterated foods. When the Health Authority has made a determination that any food is unwholesome or adulterated or unfit for human consumption or has forbidden the same or use thereof, such food shall not be used or sold and shal 1,., upon order of the Health Authority be removed, or des - troyed. When Health Authority has ordered that any clothing, equipment, or utensil in any food establishment is not to be used by reason or noncompliance with this Section or because of dirt, filth, extraneous matter, insects, corrosion, open seams or chipped or cracked surfaces, such item shall not thereafter be used. The Health Authority shall place a tag indicating such order on the item and it shall be unlawful for any person to use such item while tagged or to remove the tag except under direction of the Health Authority. 806.200. CONSTRUCTION - PLAN REVIEW. All persons who hereafter construct, remodel ,or convert buildings or facilities for use as food establishments, shall conform and comply in their construction, erection or alteration with the require- ments of this ordinance. Two ' compl ete sets of plans and specifications for such construction, remodeling or-alteration which shall show layout; arrangement; mechanical, plumbing and electrical specifications; construction materials of work areas; and location, size and type of equipment and facilities, shall be filed by its owner in the office of the Health Authority. The City shall not issue a building permit for a food establishment or remodeling or alteration permit for such establishment until such plans have the approval of the Health Authority. The food establishment shall be constructed and finished in conformance with the approved plans. The Health Authority shall inspect the food establishments as frequently as he may deem .necessary during construction to ensure that construction occurs in conformance with this ordinance. The Health Authority shall conduct a final inspection prior to the start of operations and issuance of an approved license. 806.220. FOOD SOURCES AND SUPPLIES. Food shall be in sound condition, free from spoilage, filth, or other contamination and shall be safe for human con- sumption, Food shall be obtained from sources that comply with all laws relating to . food and food labeling and approved by the Health Authority. The use of food that was not prepared in a licensed food establishment i.s prohibited. 1 . jluid milk and fluid m i l k products used or served shall be pasteurized and -_shall meet the Grade A quality standards as established by law. Fluid m i l k =and fluid m i l k products shall be served to the consumer in the individual, unopened, original containers in which they are received from-the distributor or served from a bui 1 k container equipped with 'a sanitary dispensing device. 7 M i l k containers which are served to the consumer shall not be larger than one pint. Where a bulk dispenser for m i l k and m i l k products is not available and portions of less than 1 pint are required for mixed drinks, cereal, or di ssert service, m i l k and m i l k products may be poured from a commercially filled container of not more than 112 gallon capacity. Non -dairy creaming or whitening agents shall be provided in an individual servi ce container or drawn from a refrigerated dispenser designed for such servi cr, Dry milk, dry m i l k products, and non -dairy product substitutes may be used in instant dessert and whipped products or for cooking, baking, manufacturing and pro- cessing purposes only. - 2. All frozen dairy foods, such as, but not l,i mi ted to, ice cream, frozen custards, ice milk, milk sherbet, fruit or ice sherbet, yogurt, and frozen malted milk shall meet applicable State laws, rules and regulations. 3. Fresh and frozen shucked shellfish . (oysters, clans, or mussels) shall be packed in nonreturnable packages identified with the name and address of the original shell stock processor, shucker- packer, or repacker, and the interstate certification number issued according to law. Shell stock and shucked shel 1- fish shall be kept in the container i which they were received until they are used. Each container of unshucked shell stock (oysters, clams, or mussels) shall be identified by an attached tag that states the name and address of the original shell stock processor, the kind and quality of shell stock, and -� an interstate certification number issued by the State or foreign shellfish control agency. 4. All neat and neat products received, kept, or used in any manner in any food establishment shall be officially identified as having been inspected and passed for wholesomeness by the United States Department of Agriculture, and such products upon which any official identification is lost by reason of the processing thereof shall be identified by the name and location of the pro - cessory thereon. 5. All poultry and poul trymeat products shall be clean, wholesome, free from spoilage and adulteration and shall be processed in a food establishment meeting the requirements established by law. Only clean whole eggs, with shell intact and without cracks or checks, or pasteurized liquid,' frozen, or dry eggs or pasteurized dry egg products shall be used, except that hard-boiled, peeled eggs, commercially prepared and packaged may be used. Provided that liquid, frozen, dry eggs and egg products may be used for cooking, baking, manufacturing and processing purposes only. 6. Only food grade lubricants of a safe material s-hall be used on equipment designed to receive lubrication of bearings and gears on or within food - contact surface. 806.230. FOOD PROTECTION. Food shall be -protected from. potential contami n- atf on including dusts, insects, rodents, and other vermin • unclean equipme _ � work surfaces, utensils and facilities; unnecessary or improper handling; cough and sneezes; flooding, drainage and overhead leakage or dri ppage; and utensi or equipment which have not been given bactericidal treatment. Adequate and ap protection of all food shall be provided after delivery and while being stored, pre- pared, - displayed, serviced, or sold in food establishments or transported between such establishments, V 1. Energency Occurrences . In the event of the fire, flood, power outage, or si milar events that might result in the contaimi nati on of food, or that might prevent potential hazardous food from being held in required temperatures, the licensee shall immediately contact the Health Authority. Upon receivin notice of this occurrence, the Health Authority shall take - whatever action that it deems necessary to protect the public health. 2.- jemerature Maintenance ;: a. The internal temgeratu�e of all potentially hazar�ous foods shall be � _ maintained at 40 F (4 C) or below, or 150 F (66 C) or above, except during preparation. Potentially hazardous foods requiring refrig- eration after pre garatin shall be rapidly cooled to an internal temperature of 40 F (4'C) or below within four hours after removal from the heating or hot holding device. Potentially hazardous frozn foods shall be stored at an internal temperature of 0 F (-18'C) or below. b.. Adequate, properly designed, and conveniently located mechanical refrigeration or hot food storage facilities shall be rovi ded to ensure the P e ma intenance of potentially ly hazardous food at requi red temperatures. Each facility shall be provided with a numerically s -cal ed temperature indi device o o p g i ce accurate to + _ 3 F (+ 2 C) located to measure the ai r temperature in the warmes part of the refrigeration facility or coldest part of the hot holding facility. Temperature. indicating devices shall be securely fastened and located to be easi readable. where it is impractical to install fixed temperature indicati devices on equip - q P ment such as, but not limited to, cold tabl tops, steam tables, processing lines, kettles , heat lamps, or portable transport carriers , a P rod . thermometer, accurate to + 30 F (+ 2 C) shall be maintained and used to check internal food temperatures. c. Thawing potential hazardous foods. Potentially hazardous foods s be thawed: o hall 1. In refrigerated units at a temperature not to exceed 40 F; or 2. Under potable running water of a temperature 70 or below, with sufficient water velocity to agitate and float off loose food particles into the overflow; or 3. In a microwave oven only when the food will be immediately transferred to conventional cooking facilities as. part of a continuous cooking process or when the entire, uninterrupted cooking process takes place in the microwave oven; or - 4. As part of the conventional cooking process. =d. Poultry, poultry stuffing, stuffed meats and stuffings contai meat g 9 shall be cooked to heat all parts of the food to at least 165 F (74 C) with no interruption of the cooking process. Rare roast beef shall be cooked at . an internal temperature greater than or equal to 130 F (54 C) for a period of time sufficient to destroy infectious and toxi geni c mi cgroorgani sms and held at an internal tem oerature greater than or 0 (540 P 9 equal to 130 F Q until served. e. Potentially hazardous foods that have been cooked and then refrigerated, shall be reheated rapidly to 165 F (74 C) or higher throughout before being served warm or before being placed in a hot food storage f a c i l i t y . Steam tables, bai nmari es , warmers, and similar hot food holding facilities are prohibited for the rapid reheating of potentially hazardous foods. Zk _ 806.240. PREPARATION AND SERVICE. Food shall be prepared of processed with thie least possible manual contact and in such a manner as to prevent cross - co .ntami nation of products. Suitable utensils or equipment shall be used which prior to use have been cleaned, rinsed and sanitized to prvent cross - contami nation. Raw fruits and vegetables shall be thoroughly washed with potable water before being cooked or served. Food once served to a consumer shall not be served again except that packaged food other than potentially hazardous food that is still packaged and is in sound condition may be reserved. All persons shall handle soiled equipment or utensils in a manner that minimizes contamination of their hands. Mollusks and crustacea, if served in the shell, must be served in the original shell. Re -use of such shells for food service is prohibited. 1. Condiment Dispensing a. Condiments, seasoni ngs,and dressing for self -serve use shall be provided in individual packages , from dispensers, or from approved containers., b. Condiments provided for table or counter service shall be individually portioned, except that catsup and other sauces may be served i n the original container or pour -type dispenser. Sugar for consumer use shall be provided in individual packages or in pour -type dispensers. 2. Di spensi n_g Utensils To avoid unnecessary manual contact with food, suitable dispensing utensils or equipment shall be used by employees or provided to consumers who serve themselves. Between uses during service, dispensing utensils shall be a. Stored in the food with the dispensing utensil handle extended out of the food; or b.. Stored clean and dry; or c. Stored in a running water dipper well* 3. Display Equipment Food on display shall be protected from consumer contamination by the use of packaging or by the use of easily - cl eanabl e counter, serving line or salad bar food shields, display cases, or by other effective means. Adequate and sufficient hot or cold food facilities shall be available to maintain the required temperature. of potentially hazardous food on display. • 4;r-- Re -use of Tableware Re -use of soiled' tableware by self-service consumers returning. to the service area for additional food is prohi bi =ted. Beverage cups and glasses are exempt from this requirement, 5. Food Transportation The requirements of temperature, storage, display, and for the food protection agar nst contamination as contained in this ordinance shall apply in the transporting of food from a food establishment or other location to another food establishment or other location for delivery,, service, or catering operations, 60 - Storage. f a. FDod, whether raw or prepared, if removed from the container or package 9 in which it was obtained, shall be stored in a clean covered container except during necessary periods of preparation or service. Container covers shall be impervious and nonabsorbent, except that clean linens or napkins may be used for lining or covering bread or roll serving containers. Solid cuts of meat shall be protected by being covered in storage, except that sides, quarters or primal cuts of meat may be hung uncovered on clean hooks if no food product is stored beneath the meat. b. Containers of food shall be stored a minimum of six inches above the floor in a manner that protects - the food from splash and other contarni na ti on , and that permits easy cleaning of the storage area. Containers may be stored on dollies, racks or pallets, provided such equipment is easily movable and constructed to-allow for easy cleaning. c. Food and containers of food shall not be stored under exposed or un- protected sewer lines or similar sources of potential 'contamination. The storage of food in toilet rooms or vestibules is prohibited. d. Food not subject to further washing or cooking before serving shall be stored in a way that protects it against cross - contami nation from food requiring washing or cooking. e. Packaged food shall not be stored in contact with water or undrai ned ice. Wrapped sandwiches shall not be stored in direct contact with ice. F. Bulk foods such as, but not limited to, cooking oil, legumes, tubers, grains, syrup, salt, sugar or flour and related derivative products not stored in the product container or package in which it was obtained, shall be stored in a container identifying the food by common name. 7. Poisonous or Toxic Materials There shall be present in food establishments only those poisonous or toxic materials necessary for maintaining the establishment, cleaning and sanitizing equipment and utensils, and control- ling insects and rodents. Toxic materials shall be obtained, identified, stored, and used only in such manner and under such conditions as will not contaminate food or constitute any other hazard to man. The Health Authority tshal l have the right to designate the proper storage of toxic materials. • =806-250. SANITARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS, Adequate potable= water for the needs of . the food establishment shall be provided, 7 1. Water Supplies . All water shall be drawn from the public community water supply system when available. When the public community water supply system is not available, a public non - community water supply located on the premises may be used if the operation, location , and construction are in accordance with the rules of the Minnesota Department of Health pertaining to public water supply and well water. a. 20 -Ice. All ice shall be manufactured only from potable water which has been obtained from a safe water supply. Ice shall be handled and transported in si ngl e- service containers, or in utensils which have been subject to - bactericidal treatment. Bucket, scoops, and ice containers, unless they are single-service utensils, shall be made of a smooth, impervious material and designed to facilitate cleaning. They shall be clean at all times. Canvas containers shall not be used. If ice-crushers are used, they shall be easily cleanable. They shall be maintained in a clean condition and shall be subject to bactericidal treatment' and shall be covered when not in use. Ice for con- sumer use shall be dispensed with scoops or tongs 'from a properly protected storage device, or other ice -self dispensing utensils, through automatic single service ice dispensing equipment, or be pre - packed and-portion controlled. 806.260. DISEASE PREVENTION AND CONTROL. No person, while infected wi th a disease in a communicable form that can be transmitted. by foods or who is a carrier of organisms that cause-such a disease or while afflicted with a boil, an infected wound, or an acute respiratory infection, shall work in a food service establishment in any capacity in which there is a likelihood of such person contaminating food or food - contact surfaces with pathogenic organisms or trans- mitting disease to other persons. 1. Procedure When Infection is Suspected When the Health Authority has reason- able cause to suspect possibility of disease transmission from any food - service establishment employee, the Health Authority shall secure an illness or morbidity history of the suspected employee or make such other investigation as may be indicated and take appropriate action. The Health Authority may require any or all of the following measures: a. The immediate exclusion of the employee from all food - service establishments. b. The immediate closure of the food- servi de establishment concerned until, in the opinion of the Health Authority, no further danger of disease outbreak exists. c. Restriction of the employee's services to an area of the establishment where there would be no danger of transmi tti ng disease.. d. Adequate medical and laboratory examinations of the employee, of other employees, and of his and their body discharges. 2.: ' - Cleanliness . All persons shall wear clean outer garments, maintain a high - degree of personal cleanliness, and confirm to hygienic practices during all periods of duty. Hair nets, head bands, caps,. or other hair restraints shall be used to keep hair from food utensils and equipment. All persons shall wash their hands thoroughly in an approved handwashi ng facility before starting work, and as often as may be necessary to remove soil *and contamination. No persons shall resume work after visiting the toilet room wi tho*ut first washing their hands. 12 3. lobacco The use of tobacco in any form by persons engaged in handling, It preparing, or serving food, or cleaning utensils and equipment in a food establishment is prohibited at all times when such persons are on duty for such work provided that designated locations may be approved by the Health Authority for smoking. _ 40 _ Employee Dining Area All persons shall consume food only i n :_designated dining areas. An employee , di ni ng area shall not be so designated if consuTni ng food there may result in contami ni ation of other food, equipment, utensils, -.or other items needing protection. 806.270. EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES PROVIDED. Every food establishment shall have equipment, applicable to the operation therein conducted, which is so de- signed, constructed, installed, located, and maintained as to permit full compliance with the provi sons of this ordinance. 1 . Sani tar y Des' n s d ' , Construction on an Installation a ti on of Equipment ment and Utensils, All new and replacement equipment and utensils shall be of such material , workman- ship, and design as to be smoo-th;eas i ly cleanable; resistant to wear, denting, buckling, pitting,* chipping, and crazing; and capable of withstanding scrubbing, scouring, repeated corrosive action of cleaning compounds, and other normal conditions and operation. Food contact surfaces shall be non - toxic. Food contact surfaces which come in. contact with food debris shall be readily accessible-for cleaning and inspection. All equipment installed or placed in service after the passage of this Section shall comply with the following standards of the National Sanitation Foundation when applicable: . Standard No. 1 - Soda Fountain and Luncheonette Equipment,' November, 1977 Standard No. 2 - Food Service Equipment, November, 1977 Standard No. 3 - Spray Type Dishwashing Machines, November, 1977 Standard No. 4 - Commercial Cooking and Hot Food Storage Equipment April, 1973 Standard .No. 5 - Commercial Hot Water Generating Equipment, May, 1972 Standard No. 6 - Dispensing- Freezers, July, 1970 Standard No. 7 - Food Service Refrigerators and Storage Freezers, March, 1973 Standard No.. 8 - 'Commercial Powered Food Preparation Equipment, August, 1974 t Standard No. 12 - Automatic Ice Making Equipment, November, 1977 Standard No. 13 - Refuse Compactors and Compactor Systems, March, 1973 Standard No. 18 - Manual Food and Beverage Dispensing Equipment,, .November 1977 13 Standard No. 20 - Commercial Bulk M i l k Dispensing Equipment and Appurtenances, September, 1973 Standard No. 25 - Vending Machines for Food and Beverages, May, 1976 Standard No . 29 - Detergent and Chemical Feeders for Commercial Spra M achines, p y Type Dishwashing February, 1175 Standard No. 35 - Laminated Plastics for Surfacing Food 3ervi ce Equipment, July, 1970 Criteria C -2 - Special Equipment and /or Devices, July, 1972 20 Used equipment which has met or exceeded the requirements of the National Sanitation Foundation under earlier standards may be installed when such equipment is in good repair and does not constitute a health hazard as determined by the Health Authority. Equipment in use at the time of adoption of this regulation which does not meet fully the above requirements may be continued in use only if it is in good , repair, capable of being maintained in a sanitary condition, has food - contact surfaces that are non- toxic, and is approved by the Health Authority, 3. All equi pment shall be installed and maintained as to facilitate the cleaning -� thereof, and of all adjacent areas, and shall be kept in good repair. 4. All equipment shall be located and installed in such a manner as to ensure a flow pattern of food from the time of delivery through preparation and service which minimizes the potential for cross- con tami nation and improper handling of the food. Lavatories, chef sinks, utility sinks, refrigeration equipment, hot food handling equipment, preparation and processing tables shall be provided and maintained and shall be convenient and adequate as approved by the Health Authority for the purpose for which they were designed. Equipment shall not be located under exposed or unprotected sewer lines, open stairwells, or other sources of contamination. This requirement does not apply to automatic fire protection spri er heads that may be required by law, 50 "Aisles and working spaces between units of equipment and walls shall be unobstructed and of sufficient width to permit employees to perform their duties readily without contamination of food or food- contact surfaces b clothing or personal contact. All easily movable storage equipment such as pallets, racks and dollies shall be positioned to provide accessibili to working areas. 806.280. CLEANING, SANITIZATION, AND STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT AND UTENSILS. All utensils and equipment shall be thoroughly cleaned, and food contact surfaces .of - utensils and equipment shall be given sani ti zati on treatment and shall be stcwed in such a manner as to be protected from contamination. 1. = Cleaning Frequency a. Tableware shall be washed, rinsed, and sanitized after each use. 14 b. To prevent cross- contami nati on, kitchenware and food - contact surfaces of equipment shall be washed, rinsed, and sanitized after each use and following any interruption of operations during which time contamination may have occurred. c. Where equipment and utensils are used for the preparatiop of foods on a continuous or production- basis, utensils and food - contact surfaces of equipment shall be washed, rinsed, and sanitized at intervals through- = out the day and on a schedule based on food temperature, type of food, and amount of food particle accumulation as approved by the Health Authority, d. The food - contact surfaces of kettles, grills, griddles, and similar cooking devices and the cavities and door seals of microwave ovens shall be cleaned at least once a day; except that this shall not apply to hot oil cooking equipment and hot oil filtering systems. The food- contact surfaces of all cooking equipment shall be kept free of encrusted grease deposits and other accumulated soil, e. Non - food - contact surfaces of equipment shall be cleaned as often as is necessary to keep the equipment free of accumulation of dust, dirt, food particles, and other debris 2. Oven Utensils and Equipment Utensils and equipment which routinely go into ovens for baking purposes and which are used for no other shall not be required to be given bacterci dal treatment, provided, however, such utensils and equipment are kept clean, 3. Wiping Cloths Cloths used for wiping food s p i l l s on tableware,-such as plates or bowls being served to the consumer, shall be clean, dry and used for no other purposes. Moist cloths used for wiping food spills on kitchenware and food- contact surfaces of equipment shall be clean and rinsed frequently in an approved sanitizing solution. These cloths shall be stored in sanitizing solution between uses. 4. Mechanical Cleaning and Sanitizing a. Cleaning and sanitizing may be done by spray -type or immersion utensil washing machines or by any other type of machine or device if it is demonstrated that it thoroughly cleans , sanitizes equipment and utensils and meets the requirements set forth in the National Sanitation Found- ation Standard No. 3. These machi and devices shall be properly installed, and maintained in good repair. Machines and devices -shall be operated in accordance with manufacturers' instructions, and utensils and equipment placed in the machine shall be exposed to all washing cycles, �- Automatic detergent dispensers, wetting agent dispensers, and liquid sani ti zer injectors shall be properly installed and maintained. J 1 15 b. Drainboards shall be provided and be of adequate size for the proper hand- ling of soiled utensils prior to washing and of cleaned utensils following sani ti zation and shall be so located and constructed as not to interfere with the proper use of the dishwashing facilities. This does not preclude the use of easily movable dish tables for the storage of soiled utensils or the use of easi movable dish tables for the storage of cleansed utensils following sani ti zati on. c. Equipment and utensils shall be flushed or scraped and, when necessary, soaked to remove gross food particles and soil prior to being washed in a dishwashing machine unless a prewash cycle . i s a part of the dish- washing machine operation. Equipment and utensils shall be placed in racks, trays, or baskets, or on conveyors, and in a way that food - contact surfaces are exposed to the unobstructed application of detergent wash and clean rinse waters and that permits free draining. d. Machines (single -tank, stationary -rack, door -type machines and spray - type glass washers) using chemicals for sani ti cati on may be used provided that. 1 . Wash water temperatures, addition of chemicals, rinse water temperatures, and chemical sani ti zers used are. in conformance with Standard No. 29 of the National Sanitation Foundation, identified in Section 806.270. 2. A test kit or other device that accurately measures the parts per million concentration of the sanitizing solution shall be available and used at least once daily while the chemical sani t3 zi ng machine is in use. 30 Containers -for storing the sanitizing agent shall be installed in such a manner as to ensure the operators maintain an adequate supply of sanitizing compound. e. Machines using hot water for sanitizing may be used provided that wash water and pumped rinse water shall be kept clean and water shall be maintained at not less than the temperature specified under the National Sanitation Foundation Standard No. 3 under which the machine is evaluated as. required under Section 806.270 of this ordinance . A recirculating l i n e shall be provided between the. hot water heater and the automatic dish- washer if the Health Authority deems it necessary in order to maintain required temperatures. A pressure gauge. shall be installed with a valve immediatel adjacent to the suppl side of the control valve in the final rinse line provided that this requirement shall not pertain to a dish- washing machine with a pumped final rinse. f . All utensil washi ng' machines shall be. cleaned at least once per day or more frequently if required. • i w s Wei 5. Manual Cleaning and Sanitizing a. For manual washing, ri nsi ng,and sanitizing of utensils and equipment, a sink with not fewer than three compartments shall be provided and used. Sink compartments shall be large enough to permit the accommodation of the equipment and utensils, a each compartment of the sinki7shall be supplied with hot and -cold potable running water. Fixed equi pmen! and utensils and equipment too large to be cleaned in sink compartments shall be washed manually or cleaned through pressure spray methods. i b. Integral drain boards of adequate size shall be provided at each end for proper handling of soiled utensils prior to washing and for cleaned utensils following sanitizing and shall be located so as not to interfere with the proper use of the utensil washing facilities. c. Equipment and utensils shall be prefl ushed or prescraped and, when necessary, presoaked to remove gross food particles and soil, d. Except for fixed equipment and utensils too large to be cleaned in sink compartments, manual washing, rinsing and sanitizing shall be conducted in the following sequence: 1. Sinks shall be cleaned prior, to use. 2. Equipment and utensils shall be thoroughly washed in the first compart- ment with a hot detergent solution that is kept clean. 3. Equipment and utensils shall be rinsed free of detergent and abrasives with clean water i.n the second compartment. 4. Equipment and utensils shall be sanitized in the third compartment in an approved manner. e. The food contact surfaces of all equipment and utensils shall be sanitized by one of the following methods: 1. Immersion for-at least one -half (1 /2) minute in clean, hot water at a temperature of at least 170 F (77 C) . 2. Immersion for at least one minute in clean solution containing at least 50 parts per million but not more than 200 parts per million of avail- able chlorine as a hypochlorite and at a temperature of at least 75 F (24 C). . 3. Immersion for at least-one minute in a clean solution containing at least 12:5 parts per million but not more than 25 parts per million of available iodine and having a pH not higher than 5.0 - +- and at a temperature of at least 75 F (240 C) . 17 4. Immersion in a clean solution containing any other chemical sanitizing agent approved by the Health Authority that will provide at least the equivalent bactericidal effect of a solution containing 50 parts per million of available chlorine as a hypochlorite at a temperature of at least 75 F (24o C) for one minute. 5. In the case of equipment too large to sanitize by imme!r on, rinsing, spraying, or swabbing a chemical sanitizing solution shall be used in a manner approved by the Health Authority. f, When hot water is used for sanitizing, the following facilities shad 1 be provided and used: 1. -An integral heating device or fixture installed in, on, or under the sanitizing compartment of the sink capable of maintaining the water at a temperature of at least 17 F (77 C) , , and 2. A numberi cal ly scaled indicating thermometer, accurate to ± 3 F ( ±2 C) convenient to the sink for frequent checks of water temperature, and 3. Dish baskets of such size and design to permit complete immersion of the tableware, kitchenware, and equipment in the hot water. g. When chemicals are used for sani ti zati on, at test kit or other device that accurately measures the parts per m i l l i on concentration of the solution shall be provided and used. 60 Equipment and Utensils Storage Cleaned and sanitized equipment and utensils shall be handled in a way that protects them from contamination. Spoons, knives, and forks shall be touched only by their handles. Cups glasses, bowls, plates, and similar items shall be handled without contact with inside surfaces or surfaces that contact the user's mouth. a. Utensils shall be air dried before being stored or shall be stored in a self - draining position. b. Clean and sanitized utensils and equipment shall be stored at least six inches from the floor in a clean, dry location in a way that protects them from contamination by splash, dust and other means, The food - contact surfaces of fixed equipment shall also be protected from contamination. Equipment and utensils shall not be placed under exposed sewer lines. c. Glasses and cups shall be stored inverted. Other stored utensils shall be covered or inverted, wherever practical, Facilities for the storage of knives, forks, and spoons, shall be designed and used to present the _ handle to the employee or consumer. 70 - Si n l e- Service Articles Single - service articles shall have been manufactured, packaged, transported, stored, handled, and dispensed in a sanitary manner. 18 806.290. PLUMBING FACILITIES AND UTILITIES. Plumbing shall be so sized and installed and maintained as to carry adequate quantities of water to required locations throughout the establishment, prevent contami ni ation of water supply and convey sewage and liquid wastes adequately from the establishment to the sewage system so that it does not constitute a source of contamination of food, utensils, or equipment or create an unsanitary condition or nuisance. FoodJ-;service equipment such as refrigerators, ice makers, and steam tables shall not be di-rectly connected to the sewer. All new plumbing and all plumbing reconstructed or--replaced after theeffecti ve date of this Section-shall be designed, constructed and installed in conformity with the Plumbing Code of the Minnesota Department of Health. 806.300. HANDWASHING FACILITIES. Every food establishment, other than itinerant food establishments and food vehicles handling only pre - packaged food or which transport meat in the runner provided by State law or regulation, shall be provided with adequate, conveniently located, and approved handwashi ng facilities which are continually maintained with hot and cold running water, hand cleansing compound, fingernail brushes, and single - service towels or hand - drying devices. Handwashi ng facilities shall be accessible to persons at all times in all areas where food is prepared or served, utensils and equipment are cleansed or sanitized, in or immediately adjacent to toilet rooms or other areas as may be designated by the Health Authority. Sinks used for food preparation or for washing equipment or utensils shall not be used for handwashi ng. Each handwashi ng sink shall be pro- vided with hot and cold water tempered by means of a mixing valve or combination faucet.. The maximum temperature of hot water shall not exceed 130 F from the faucet. Any self - closing, slow-closing, or metering faucet used shall be designed to provide a flow of water for at least 15 seconds without the need to reactivate the faucet. Steam - mixing valves are prohibited. - 806.310. SEWAGE. All sewage, including liquid waste, shall be disposed of by a public sewerage or by an approved sewage disposal system. Non - water - carried sewage disposal facilities are prohibited, except as permitted by the Health Authority because of special situations. 1. Individual Sewage Disposal System. When an individual sewage disposal system is required, it shall be designed, 1 ocated, and constructed in compliance with regulations of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Food vehicles may . dispose of their liquid-waste into receptabl es carried on the vehicle for that purpose.. This waste ultimately shall be discharged into the public sewerage system or otherwise disposed of in a manner which will not endanger any source of water supply... pollute any body of surface water, create a nuisance, or otherwise endanger the public health and safety. 2. loilet Facilities Every food establishment with the exception of food vehicles shall . be provided with conveniently located and approved toilet facilities for employees which are kept clean and in good repair and free from flies insects, and offensive odors. Toilet fixtures and seats shall be of sanitary ,design and treadi ly cleanable. The doors of all toilet rooms shall be self - closing. Easily • -cleanable receptacles shall 'be provided for waste materials. .Separate employees toilets shall be provided for each sex when five or more employees may be on duty at any one time unless all employees are of the same sex pursuant to boni fi ed occupation qualification exception. An adequate supply of toilet tissue shall 'be provided and maintained at each toilet at all times. 19 . 806.320. GARBAGE AND REFUSE DISPOSAL. All garbage and refuse prior to disposal shal be kept in tight non - absorbant, insect-proof, rodent -proof and fire -proof containers. Containers shall be kept covered with close - fitting l i d s when filled, in storage, or not in continuous use. Containers need not be covered when stored in special insect and rodent - proofed room or enclosure. All other refuse shall be stored in containers, rooms, or areas in an approved manner. The rooms, enclosures, areas, and containers used sh all be adequate for the storage of alJ garbage and refuse accumulating on the premises between collection. Adequate €leaning faciJ i ti es shall be provided, and each container, room, or area sh�l 1 be thoroughly cleaned after the emptying or removal of garbage and refuse. Containers designed wi tt drains shall have drain plugs maintained in place at all times except during cl eai-i ng. All garbage and refuse shall be disposed of with sufficient frequency and in such a manner as to prevent nuisance. 806.330. INSECT AND RODENT CONTROL. 1. Effective measures shall be taken to prevent the entrance, breeding, or presence of rodents, flies, cockroaches, and other vermin or insects on the premises. The premises shall -be kept in such condition as to prevent the harborage or feeding of insects or rodents, 2. Openings to the outside shat 1 -be effectively protected against the entrance of rodents. Outside openings shall be protect against the entrance of insects by tight - fitting, self - closing doors, closed windows, screening, controlled air currents, or other means. Screen doors shall be self- closing and screens for windows, doors, skylights, transoms, intake and exhaust air ducts, and other openings to the outside shall be tight - fitting and free of breaks. Screening materials shall not be less than 16 mesh to the inch. 806.340. CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF PHYSICAL FACILITIES, 1. Floors The floor surfaces of all food preparation, food storage, equipment and utensil washing food serving areas, waitress stations, dressing rooms, locker rooms, toilet rooms and vesti bules, jani tori al areas., walk-in refriger- ation, kitchens, and bars shall be constructed of smooth, non - aborbent, easi cleanable material which resist the wear and abu to which they are subject, such as ceramic tile, quarry t i l e or terrazzo. The j unctures between walls and floors shall be coved. All floors shall be kept clean and in good repair, and the use of sawdust and similar material shall not be permitted. 'These requirements do not prevent the use of rugs and carpets in dining rooms and hallways, provided that such floor coverings are kept clean. Abrasive strips also may be used wherever deemed necessary to prevent accidents. Floor drains shall be provided in all rooms where floors are subject to flooding -type cleaning or where normal operations release or discharge water or other liquid wastes on the floor. Such floors shall be graded to drain. The walking and driving surfaces of all exterior areas where food s served shall be kept clean, properly drained, and finished - so as to facilitate maintenance and minimize _lust. flats and duckboards shall be of non- absorbent, non -wood, grease resistant materials of such size, design, and construction as to facilitate their being vasi ly cleaned. Duckboards shall not be used as storage racks =. 20 2. Walls and Ceiling . The walls and ceilings of all rooms shall be kept clean and in good repair. All walls of rooms or . areas in which food is prepared, areas where utensils or hands are washed, toilet rooms, janitorial areas, laundry rooms or garbage and refuse storage rooms shall have easily - cleanable, smooth, non - absorvent washable surfaces to the highest level reached by splash, spray or abuse. Wall finishes shall be resistant to the wear and abuse to which they are subjected. Ceilings of such rooms shall be easily cleanable. The walls and ceilings of such rooms shall be finished in a 1 i g color. f 30 Utilit y Line and Pipes All utility lines and pipes such as, but not limited to, electric, gas, water, sewage and s i m i l a r waste lines or services shall be instal 1 ed in the w a l l s , under floors, or above ceilings so as to not be unnecessarily exposed in or on food equipment, walls, floors or c e i l i n g s . Exposed utility service lines or pipes shall be installed in a manner that does not obstruct or prevent the easy cleaning of food equipment, floors, wall and ceiling surfaces and areas. 806.350. LIGHTING. 1. General All areas in which food is prepared, processed, manufactured, packaged or stored; or where utensils and equipment are washed; handwashi ng areas, locker rooms, toilet rooms; and all garbage and refuse storage areas shall be w e l l lighted. All food contact surfaces s hal 1 be illuminated at not less than twenty foot candles of light. At least ten foot candles of light shal 1 be provided on all other surfaces and equipment. In storage areas, a minimum of five foot candles of light measured at 30 inches from the floor shall be provided. Subdued lighting i n dining rooms and public access areas is permissible, provided that lighting meeting the-above requirements shall be available during all clean -up periods in dining rooms and access areas. 2. Protective S h i e l a. Shielding to protect against broken glass falling onto food shall be provided for all artificial lighting fixtures located over, by, or within food storage, preparation, service, and display facilities, and facilities where utensils and equipment are cleaned and stored. b. Infrared or other heat lamps shall be protected against breakage by a shield surrounding and extending beyond the bulb, leaving only the face of the bulb exposed. 806.360. VENTILATION. All rooms shall have sufficient makeup and exhaust ventilation to keep them free of excessive heat, steam, condensation, vapors obnoxious or disagreeable odors, smoke and fumes, All ventilation equipment ,and facilities, gas or oil fired room heaters and water heaters shall be designed, installed and operated in accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code of the Mi nn-esota Department of Administration and the Uniform Fire Code of the Minnesota Firer Marshal. Intake and exhaust air ducts shall be maintained to prevent the entio nce of dust, dirt, and other contaminating materials. 806.370. PREMISES 1. Houskeepi nq . All parts of the food es tabl i.shment and its premises shall be kept neat, clean, and free of litter and refuse. . Cleaning operations shall be 21 conducted in such a manner as to minimize contamination of food and food contact surfaces. Soiled linens, coats and aprons shall be kept in approved containers until removed for laundering. Only articles necessary for the operation and maintenance of the food service establishment shall be stored on the premises. The traffic of unnecessary persons through the food - preparation and utensil- washing areas is prohibited. 2. Janitorial Fa ci 1 i ti es . Janitorial facilities shall be providid including a -rani tore al utility sink. Faci lities and equipment shall be located and stored "i n an approved manner in an area other than a food preparati orf or storage area =or toilet room. If adequate segregation, separation, or other protection has been provided and approved by tine Neal th Authority, such an area may be located i n a packaged goods storeroom or employee toilet. room.. The use of lavatories, utensil washing or equipment washing, or food preparation sinks for this purpose is prohibited. 3. Living Areas No operation of a food service establishment shall be conducted in any room used as living or sleeping quarters, Food operations shall be separated from any living or sleeping quarters by complete partitioning and solid, self - closing doors. 4 .' Animals Live animals, including birds and turtles, shall be excluded from within the food service operation premises and from adjacent areas under the control of the permit holder. This exclusion does not apply to edible fish, crustacea, mollusks, or to fish in aquariums. Patrol dogs accompanying security or police officers, or guide dogs accompany blind persons or deaf persons shall be permitted in dining areas. 5. Pressing Rooms. If employees routinely change clothes within the establish- ment,, rooms or areas- shall be designated and used for that purpose. Those designated rooms or areas shall not be used for food preparation, storage, or service, or for utensil washing or storage. 6. Locker Areas Adequate lockers or other suitable facilities shall be provided and used for the orderly storage and security of employee clothing and other belongings. Lockers or other suitable facilities may be located only i n the designated and approved dressing rooms or in food storage rooms or areas containing only. completely packaged food or packaged single-service articles. 7. Laundry Facilities a. Laundry facilities in a food establishment shall be restricted to the washing and dr�fi ng of 1 i nens, cl othes , uniforms and aprons necessary to the operation. If such items are laundered on the premises, an electric or gas dryer be provided and used. b. Separate rooms shall be provided for laundry facilities except that such operations may be conducted in storage rooms if properly segregated from • _ food or packaged single- service articles. 8. linen and Clothes Storage a. Clean clothes and linens shall be stored in a clean place and protected from contamination until used, b. Soiled clothes and linens shall be stored in non - aborbent containers or washable laundry bags until removed for laundering. 22 9. Cleaning Equipment Storage Maintenance and cleaning tools such as brooms, mops, vacuum cleaners and s i m i l a r equipment shall be maintained and stored in a way that does not contaminate food, utensils, equipment, or linens and shall be stored in an orderly manner for the cleaning of that storage location They shall not be stored in food preparation, food service, or utensil working areas. - _806.380. ITINERANT FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS AND CATERING FOOD VEHt;CLES. Itinerant food establishments and catering food vehicles shall comply with all applicable provi si ons of this ordinance and shall be operated in an approved manner. The Heafth Authority may waive specific requirements for physical facilities, when in the opinion of the Health Authority .suitable substitutes which are provided w i l l not result in an imminent health hazard. The Health Authority may l i m i t the sale or giving away of some or all potentially hazardous foods. Before commencing .operations of any kind, the licensee hereunder shall notify the Health Authority that such food establishment is ready for final inspection, and the Health Authority shall immediately make an inspection and issue a report thereon, and no itinerant food establishment or catering food vehicle shall commence operations until the requirements of this ordinance have been met in accordance with the Health Authority's final inspection reports. 806.390. MISREPRESENTATION OF FOOD. It shall be unlawful for the licensee of any food establishment to in any way misrepresent food or_ beverages offered to the public. Practices which cons ti tute' mi srepresentati on shall include but are not limited to the sale of adulterated food; subsi tution of food items of lesser quality, or different from food items advertised; making statements giving in- correct or deceptive points of origin; making misleading statements of size, number, weight or price; and not meeting standards of identity defined by Federal and State laws for certain foods. 806.400. MINNESOTA CLEAN INDOOR AIR ACT. The licensee of every food establish- ment shall make adequate provisions to meet the requirements of the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act and the Minnesota regulations pertaining thereto. 806.410. REVOCATION OF LICENSE. Any license .issued under this Section may be revoked in the manner provided in Section 806.080 of the City of Maplewood Code . 806.420. INTERFERENCE WITH, OR HINDRANCE OF, HEALTH AUTHORITY. No person shall interfere with, obstruct, or hinder any Health Authority in the performance of their duties under this Section or the laws of the State of Minnesota, nor prevent their performance thereof, 806.430. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF LICENSE. The Health Authority with the approval of the City Manager shall immediately suspend the license of any food establishment for the violation of any terms of this Section if such violations cons-ti Lute an imminent public health hazard. Upon notification by the Health Aut4brity of a temporary suspension of license by posting of this report at the time of itie inspection, the licensee shal 1 forthwith cease operation. :The licensee may appeal in temporary suspension i n writing to the City Counci 1 i n the manner pro - vi ded i n Sects on 806.080 of the City of Maplewood Code. Upon notffi cati on in writing by the licensee to the Health Authority that all violation's have been corrected, for which temporary suspension was invoked, the Health Authority shall reinspect the food establishment within a reasonable length of time. If all violations constituting the ground for the temporary suspension have been corrected, the Health Authority shall forthwith terminate the suspension, 23 806.440. LAWS, RULES, AND REGULATIONS, This Section shall be construed to be supplementary to all laws, rules and regulations of the Minnesota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Agriculture and is not intended and shall not be construed to permit that which is prohibited or declared unlawful by any such competent authority. All establishments shall - in addition to this Section comply with the applicable regulations of the Minnesota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Agriculture. 806.450. PENALTY. Any person convicted of violating the proVi si ons of this Ordinance will be guilty of a misdemeanor. `SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon passage and publ i cati on according to law. Passed by the Council of the City of Maplewood this day of , 19 Mayor Attest: Clerk Ayes - Nays - 24 r r MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager =- cti b FROM: Director of Community Development A cti;�z, {.- o SUBJECT: Tax Exempt Mortgage Revenue Note Financing DATE: September 4, 1980r At its August 18 meeting, the Planning Commission directed Staff to evaluate the cri other communities use 'to consider proposals for tax exempt mortgage revenue note financing. w Several communities in the Metropolitan' area were surveyed. The results of the ,survey are listed i n Part I. Only those criteria that are different from Maplewood's are presented. Mapl ewood's criteria are also listed for comparative purposes. As background information, the statutory objectives of tax exempt mortgag financing are listed in Part II. A brief di sgussi on of the positive and negative aspects of this funding concept i-s -also presented. Part III contains recommendations for revising Maplewood' s present project evaluation criteria and review procedures. These revisi are proposed in response to previous Planning Commission concerns that the City's present criteria are too broad. Additionally, there is growing concern at both the State and Federal levels, that projects are being approved that do not meet the intent of the tax exempt mortgage legislation. In Minnesota, a task force is presently drafting legislation for the 1981 Legislative Session to address these concerns. It is also a responsibility of the City to make use of this financing tool in a manner aligned with the objectives of the legislation. I. PROJECT REVIEW CRITERIA A. Mapl 1. The project shall be compatible with the overall development plans .of the City. 2. The project shall not require a significant amount of public expenditures for City improvements such as roads, sewers, and water- mains. 3. The project shall involve a business of a nature that the City would wish to attract or an exi busi ness that the Ci t� would desire to expand 4. The number of businesses of the same general nature in the area of the proposed project shall be considered in determining the need for commercial revenue note financing. 1 } 5. The City financing of the project shall be limited to the issuance of a single mortgage revenue. note to be marketed as a private place- men t. 6. The applicant shall sign a memorandum of agreement providing that they will pay all costs involved i n the legal and fiscal review of the proposed project and all costs involved i n the �_i ssuance of notes to finance the project. 7. The City reserves the right to deny any application for financing at any_ stage of the proceedings prior to adopting the resolution authorizing the issuance of a note. B. -Selected Criteria of Other Communities 1. Brooklyn Center a. Local businesses with a proven track record to receive preference over new businesses which woul -d -be in competition with existing businesses. b. Reuse of vacant or scheduled to be vacated buildings. c. Corporate offices to provide more job opportunities, d. Light manufacturing, low in pollution potential, emphasis on provision of jobs for less skilled:. e. Improvement of existing shopping centers. f. Relatively low cost in terms of long term provision of City servi ces . 2. Bloomington a. Applicant must not commence any part of the proposed construction until the project has received preliminary approval by the Counci b. Projects are to be reviewed in terms of further development, potential for empl oyment, impact on City service needs and support for industrial or commercial operations located in the city* 3. Minneapolis a. b. C. d. e . Creation of new jobs. Relocation of exi. s ti ng industry unable to expand at existing location. } Location within_ a target blighted or margi. nal area . Relocation of existing industry di spl aced by construction of highways or publi i mprovements . Projects to reduce polluti by industry. 2 4. Chanhassen a. New construction or plant expansion in excess of $500,000. b. Proposed use will not conflict with existing local enterprise. c. A plat showing existing and planned roads, uti T.:i ti es , and drainage structures must be approved by the City prior to prel i mi nary note = approval. = d. Evidence that provisions have been made for the payment of any expenses to develop proposed facilities. e. Multi - purpose projects to be encouraged. Definitions: Existing business: 1. A presently operating industrial or commercial venture with five years of operational history. 2. A new business venture proposed to be undertaken by an existing business. New Business: Any industrial or commercial venture eligible for tax exempt financing under State law, but which does not qualify as an existing business. 5. Brooklyn Park a. The industrial or commercial project shall be for no loss than $500,000. b. Potential for employment, incentive for further development, increased tax base, impact on City service needs and support for industrial commercial enterprises located in the City, c. Total aggregate amount of notes outstanding shall not exceed 5/ of the total assessed (taxable) valuation of the City. d. Tax exempt mortgage financing shall not be available to limited partnerships and other forms of tax sheltered business organi z ati ons whereby individuals gain personal tax advantages e. The application shall not be considered by the City Council until tentative Code findings and requirements have been rude with respect to zoning, building plans, platting, streets, and utility services. R 3 f . The application shall be accompanied by a tentative letter of commitment from the institution. g. The applicant shall not commence any part of the construction of the project until there has been preliminary approval by the Council of the application for financing, _ 6. St. Paul F a. Discourage low employment opportunity warehouse projects. b. Increase tax base 7. Edina (The concept is not well supported, as such, very strict criteria have been adopted) a. The project must equal or exceed $1,000,000 b. The fair market value of the structure must equal the total aggregate amount of bonds and interest thereon. c. The net revenue, for the past three years, shall not be less than two times the total of: (1) Annual principal and interest payments on the applicant's outstanding debt; (2) The annual rental payments on the applicant's then out- standing leases; and, (3) The principal and interest payments on the tax exempt mortgage 8. Roseville: In 1979, Roseville passed a resolution prohibiting tax exempt mortgage revenue fi:nandtng based upon: a. "Business conditions requiring such method of financing do not exist in the City of Roseville; and b. Present businesses have not had the advantage of tax free financing." II . Statutory Objectives of Tax Exempt Mortage Financing: A. Prevent economic deterioration 8. Prevent the emergence of blighted and marginal areas •L Co Prevent chronic unemployment p yment , D. Retain existing industry and develop new ones to take advantage of pre- vious local educational and public service facility investment _ 4 E. Increase the existing tax base to support increasing government service costs F. Aid in the redevelopment of blighted and marginal land, and areas of substantial and persistent unemployment, 'Benefits of Tax Exempt Mortgage Financing: A. Development is encouraged which may not otherwise occur.` These pro jects , in turn, benefit the community through provision of additional job opportunities, increased tax base and "spin off" benefits to existing business. B. The developer is typically eligible for a mortgage, two percent below market rate interest. C. The lender is exempt ' from federal income tax on interest revenue generated by such a mortgage, D. Tax exempt mortgage revenue note financing is not likely to compete for City bond issue investors. Comment: Conversations with Andrew Merry of Juran and Moody and the City Finance Director have substantiated this statement. Negative Aspects: A. The potential of "unfair" competi with existing businesses who had to pay market rate interest. B. Loss of federal income tax revenue from the interest generated by a tax exempt mortgage. C. Inability to determine whether or not a project could be successful without the tax exempt mortgage financing, ..D. Forty percent of Mapl ewood's commercial and industrial tax revenue is lost to fiscal disparities redistribution, as such, jobs should be the primary consideration. E. A continuing cast to the City in terms of annual reporting and auditing of the remaining principal, III . Recommendations A. Revise the present project review criteria to more .precisely define the types and locations of projects the City wishes to consider B. Revise the resent administrative strati ve oriented criteria to more clearly p y y define the City's processing requirements'. 5 S The following criteria were developed by the Planning Commission to replace the existing criteria listed on pages 1 and .2 of this memo (new wording is underlined): A. Definitions 1. Existing Business shall be defined as a presently operating industry or commercial enterprise with at least one -year of operational history within the city - 2. New Business shall be defined as any industrial or commercial enterprise which does not qualify as an existing business. B . Project E1 i g i bi l i ty Gu idelines 1. The project shall be compatible with the overall development plans of the City, including the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning, and Community Design Review Board Standards 2 . The project shall not require a s i g n i f i c a n t amount of public expendi for City improvements such as roads, sewers, and watermai ns . 3. The .project shall involve an existing business that the City wishes to expand or a new business which the City wishes to attract: a. Existing Business Criteria Any expansion, relocation, or rehabi - 1 i tati on of an exist' n� htjci nACC b. New Business Criteria (1) Offers at le 400 man -hours per week of new employment o a year around basis , and (2) Possesses a low potential for creating ,pol 1 uti on , or (3) The project involved the rehabilitation of a vacant or scheduled to be vacated structure,, or The proposed location is within a designated (4 ) i deve t o meat o r .� redevelopment target area 4. The number of businesses of the same •general nature __in the area of the proposed project shall be considered in determining the need for commercial revenue note financing. 5. The note shall be for an i ssue of no l ess than $500,000. T C. Application Processing Guidelines 1. City financing of the project shall be limited to the issuance of a single mortgage revenue note,, to be marketed as a private place- ment, 2. Final approval shall not be gra nted b the C,i*. Counci 1 unti 1 the roj ect has received approval with respect to Zoning, , site p PP P g design , b u i l d i n g design, or platting . Comment: The granting of preliminary approval indicates to the State of Minnesota that the City supports the project, as proposed, including estimated cost. Furthermore, following this approval, the devel oper typically begins to incur substantial costs - costs which are not recoverable if the project were to later fail . For example: $5000 - $10,000 for a bond Counsel_ t and l to 3 percen of the mortgage value to the lender as a load origination charge. 3. The applicant shall sign a memorandum of agreement providing that they will pay all costs involved i n the legal and fiscal review of the proposed project sand all costs involved i n the issuance of notes to finance the project. 4. The City reserves the right to deny any application for financing at any stage of the proceedings prior to adopting the resolution authorizing issuance of the note. 5. A filing fee of $500.00 shall be submitted with the application. Comment: Our experience . has proven that the present $30.00 fee does not cover the City's expenses for processing a revenue note application.* Revenue note processing requirements are more extensive than that of rezoni ngs and special use each requiring a fee of $100.00. Estimated City cost to process an application: City Clerk - $225.00 Legal. Notices, Certifications, Minutes /Publication Finance Dept. - 200.00 Long -term cost of an audit confirmation each year ' at $10/yr.' (20 yrs . X $100 /yr = 200 ) Planning Dept. - 75.00 Staff Report, coordination of Staff input $500.00 w R 7 States and municipalities are pushing indus- trial revenue bonds'like there's no tomoiTow. The) don't cost the states and municipalities anything. But somebody pays -o f lunch ATE NIGHT TV watchers in the New York area have occasionally been greeted by Mayor Ed Koch on their screens. His pitch: Move your bu si- ness to New York keep your business in New York, expand your business in New York. The inducement: industrial rev- enue bonds, freely given. These bonds (IRBs), issued for corpora- tions through state and municipal agen- cies, are tax -free at. the federal level. In- terest is often three percentage paints below the going corporate bond rate. Koch smiles as he wheedles. XRBs seem like a free lunch to him.. But to Uncle Sam they are .expense account lunches --with the Feds footing the bill in uncollected taxes. The tab is at an alltime high. Though the figures are controversial, the Public Securities Association puts it at around $4 billion. One thing is sure, however. The total amount of taxes ren- dered uncollectible by those IRBs is enor- mous. Estimates of the total potential tax loss run to tens of billions of dollars. FORBES estimates that over $1.4 billion (in 1980 dollars) of fe deral taxes --- -aver the next 15 years- -%verc given a by states and municipalities last year alone. The list of firms large and small- - which are receiving IRB financing seems endless. just a - few of the major firms with tear or move IRBs: Boise Cascade, Georgia - Pacific, ITT, Monsanto and Weyerhaeuser. In April, Broome County, N.Y. gave Sarin Corp. $10 million worth of IRBs to help , build a new 2,000 -em- ployee plant there. Total potential sav- FORBES, AUGUST 4, 1980 ings to Savin over 20 years: $7 million. Nots °only do IRBs cost the Feds bil- lions —they may not even work. Says Lawrence Litvak,. an economic consultant to state and local govern- ments who has written a .widely praised study of IRBs: "Only in a third of the cases have IRBs been found to be even a marginally significant factor in a com- pany's location decision. This includes many situations where IRB financing in one state or town merely offsets its avail- ability in another." What's more, IRBs never save enough money to offset such crucial locational factors as unions or high energy costs. This round of heavy IRB use is actually the second such boom since World War 11. In the 1940s and 1950s, the Sunbelt states began, slowly, to use IRBs in their quest for northern manufacturing jobs. By the late 1960s they were in common use. But in 1968 * when about $1.6 bil- lion worth were issued the Feds got nervous about the tax drain and put a $1 million limit on individual issues. In 1971 that limit was hiked to $5 million an issue and about 18 months ago it went to $10 million. The $10 mil- lion mark seems magical because it in- spired renewed interest in their use, par ticularly in industrial states. What has helped keep .interest in IRBs growing since 1968 is the fact that no limit was ever=set on pollution control bonds, which last year represCiited over half of all IRBs sold. Few people argue against pollution control bonds, though. It's the IRBs that are causing the contro- versy---especially those used for some- what "creative" purposes. In May, for example, Smith Barney purchased three issues through Utah municipalities for K marts. Many economists, and especially those in the U.S. Treasury, feel that the states shouldn't forget that the "I" in IRB stands for "industrial." Service oper- ations and retailers generally go where the markets are * without incentives. Perhaps the most audacious use of IRBs for nonindustrial purposes has been for McDonald's outlets and other fast - food restaurants. Says Roger J. Vaughan, deputy director of New York State's Office of Develop- ment Planning, 'When they give out IRBs for McDonald's. is that doing anything for economic development? Absolutely nothing. Nothing. If there is a- market for a hamburger franchise, it will open." Of course, there are a fair number of IRBs given out for rational truly public interest purposes. Who can fault a state for giving out an IRB to induce a firm to move to a low - employment area, for ex- ample, instead of a potentially more at- tractive, job -rich section of the state? Trouble is, it's very difficult to legis- late, at the federal level, specific uses for IRBs. "The mutual immunity. of the fed- eral and state governments from one an- other's taxes is a constitutional right," explains Arthur j. Kalita, executive direc tor of the Public Securities Asso ciation. "The federal government cannot inter- fere in the state's ability to rDcourl development however it sees fit." What the states don't realize is that they might be better off if someone restricted IRBs. As Ben Weberman points out on page 90 of this issue, overuse of special - purpose tax -free bonds has kept the tax- exempt bond market glutted and weak. This may be good for investors, but it raises bor- rowing 'costs XP the entire municipal market Riebard- Greene 69 M E M O RA N D U M r� TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Design Review Appeal by Clinton McLagan Ac LOCATJON: Century Avenue and Minnehaha Avenue`" APPLICANT /OWNER: R. C. Ernst PROJECT: McDonal ds Restaurant DATE: September 11 , 1980 Reque Clinton McLagan, Attorney for Dairy Queen, is appealing the motion by the Community Design Review Board regarding the proposed McDonal d' s restaurant. His reasons for the appeal are as follows: r 1. , He feels that the Board did not find that, the development would not create any traffic hazards. 2. He feels that the environmental impact of filling the existing swamp and creating a holding pond on the existing high ground is substantial. He feels that drainage problems will result to the immediate area and, also, downstream. Pact- Artinn 9 -2 -80: The Community Design Review Board approved the McDonald's plan with the following conditions: 1 . The applicant shall f i l l and sod the adjacent property to the west. The f i l l is to prevent pondi ng on the adjacent parcel and is subject to approval by the City Engineer. The fence along the property l i n e w i l l be maintained at a 6 foot level 2. Stop signs shall be placed at all exits 1 .3. The parking stalls for the convenience center shall measure 10 . by 20 feet 4. The applicant shall provide evidence of the granting of a 10 foot easement to Ramsey County along Mi nnehaha Avenue 5. Continuous concrete curbing shall be provided 6. Approval of design plans does not constitute approval of a b u i l d i n g permit y 70 All exterior building or roof top equipment and electrical transformers shall be -screened in a decorative manner. Screening is subject to Staff approval 8. A comprehensive signage plan shall be submitted for Board approval for the convenience center 9. The applicant shall construct a three acre foot holding pond on lots 9 and 10 10. There shall be no slope on'the site exceeding a 3:1 ratio 11. The applicant shall install culverts beneath driveways to maintain the existing ditch drainage 12 . Site security lighting shal 1 be provided and shall be directed so not to cause any undue glare onto adjacent ro erti es - or roadways p p Y 13. Addi tional 1 andscapi ng shal l be . provi ded al ong the west 1 of 1 i ne around the pondi ng area and around the convenience center .and shall be subject to Board approval. The landscaping al ong - the south side of-the convenience center =s*,hal l be .revi to utilize more trees and less-low growing shrubs 14. If-7 has not been installed the time of occupancy, the applicant �4ial l provide the City with an irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of 150% to guarantee the installation of landscaping. 15. All required plant materials that die shall be replaced by the appl i cant 16. To ensure that a building will not be constructed too close to the convenience center, the applicant shall provide the City with a slope easement 17. Trash enclosures shall be constructed of brick to match the buildings and shal l have. closeable gates 18. All exits from the site shall be right turn only. The site plan shall be revised with curb cuts designed to prohibit left turns from the site. This revision shall be subject to approval by the-City Engineer 19. Owner and applicant agree to above conditions in writing Staff's Considerations Staff feels that condition Number 18 should be amended. Although the Board accepted Staff's condition regarding right turn exists only, as was written in the Staff Report, Staff feels that only the exit on Century Avenue shall be controlled in this fashion. Staff feels that the traffic load on Mi nnehaha Avenue is not as critical on Century Avenue. Also, forcing vehicles to turn right onto Minnehaha Avenue will cause them to circle through the residential neighborhood along Margaret Avenue and Ferndale Street if they had wanted to go west. Analysi s Staff proposes amending condition Number 18 as just mentioned. Staff does not agree with Mr. McLagan in reference to drainage problems and increased traffic hazards. Staff feels that the -d rai nage question is resolved, meet the requirements of Mapl ewood Drainage Plan. increase with operation of the two b u i l d i n g s . others busi ness coming into the area. The applicant cuts 'as far away from the intersection as possible, traffic problems. since the Needless This would has taken i n an .attl proposed drainage does to say, traffic - wi l l also be true with any precautions to keep curb empt to prevent potential w i A 2 Recommendation Amendment of condition Number 18 , to read "The exit into Century Avequp shall be - right turn only. The site plan shall be revised with curb cuts designed to prohibit left-turns from the Convenience Center site. The design shall be su_A;-j ect to appro l of the City Engineer." =" 3 r rY. i 3 MEMORANDUM ,�. T0: FROM: SUBJECT: MCATION: APPLICANT /OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: City Manager Director of Community Development .w Plan Review - -- Century Avenue and Mi nnehaha Avenue R. C. Ernst McDonald's Restaurant and Convenience Center August 21, 1980 Request Approval to construct a NcDonald's Restaurant and a neighborhood convenience center. Site Description 1. Refer to . the enclosed maps for location and property lines. 2. Lot Size: 39,600 square feet. 3. Existing Land Use: Undeveloped Proposed Land Use 1. McDonal d's a. 3,680 square foot building one story in height b. Brick exterior on all four elevations C* Mansard roof d. Drive up service window e. 49 parking spaces. Two are handicap s t a l l s . f. The parking stalls meet City requirements as per number and size. 9. Outdoor trash storage is proposed. The City requires a masonry enclosure be provided compatible with the building* y 'h. The - proposed landscaping is adequate except along the weesterly l ot 1 i-ne . Trees are shown 60 feet on center. The Board's landscaping policy calls for trees at 30 feet on center. ..: EI 1 S 2. Convenience Center a. 6,720 square foot building one story in height b. Brick exterior on all four sides with a mansard roof across the front elevation only c. 36 parking spaces are proposed. 34 are required =p d. The parking stalls meet City requirements as per number Ind size . e. The building is proposed al onq the southerly lot l i n e of the site and j 15 feet from the Centur:N/ Avenue right -of -way f. Outdoor trash storage is proposed g. Proposed landscaping around this bui 1 di na is meager Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Mi nnehaha Avenue and Maplewood Auto Service Southerly: Undeveloped property planned for Rh, High Density Residential and zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Residential Easterly: Century Avenue and a service station in the City of Oakdale Westerly: Single family dwellings Past Actions 5- 19 -61: Council rezoned the site from R-1, Single Dwelling Residential to BC, Business Commercial. 7 -5 -79: Council denied a request by the applicant for a zone change and Plan amendment for the adjacent land to the south. Denial of the Plan amendment was on the basis that: 1. A section of the Rh classification would be eliminated 2. The housing mix balance as proposed by the Plan would not be met 3. Vehicular traffic generated by the proposed commercial use is a Public Safety concern Denial of the zone change was on the basis that it was not consistant with the City's Land Use P l a n . 8- 4Z -80: The Board recommended tabl i ng of the proposed building and site plan fof 4ithe McDonal d' s Restaurant and convenience center on Century and Mi nnehaha Avi'Aue due to the following questions 1. The traffic situation must be addressed by the Director of RQbl i c Safety and a determination of right turn only will be necessary. 9 2. The drainage situation on the neighboring property to the west be addressed and a solution be arrived at between the applicant; west property owner and the City Engineer 3. Landscaping plan be submitted for southern side of convenience center to - break up the long wall of brick 40 + I)rai nage questions concerning excess water from the north on _tientury, Z. from the west on Mi nne,haha, and north from Mayhi l l must be ad3ressed by the Ci ty Engi neer 5. Will the drainage problems result i n . nei ghborhi ng properties to be assessed for storm sewer construction because of this proposed development? 6. A separate sign plan should be submitted for consideration for the convenience center 7. The dedication of the pondi ng area and maintenance of i.t should be researched by staff 8. The culverts and 3:1 bank ratio as mentioned by the City Engineer should be incorporated into the drainage plans 9. The question of landscaping on lot 9 for future multiple site should be answered. 10. Easement area to be dedicated to the County for utility use should be agreed to in writing between the County and the owner with copies to City. Also the setback from Mi nnehana and Century must be confirmed with County and the State 11. The site _plan should be revised to show 10 by 20 parki nq stalls 8- 26 -80: The item was continued to 9 -2 -80 due to lack of quorum. Planning Considerations 1. Land-Use Plan Designation: SC, Service Commercial Center 2. This Land Use Plan classification permits the proposed uses 3. Zoning: BC, Business Commercial 202.180 of the City Code states that in order for the Board to 4 . Section y recommend approval of an application, they must make the following findings: .a . That the design and location of the proposed development and its re- I 1ationship to neighboring or existing or proposed developments and traffic i s such that i t will not impair the desirability of invest . I notT.- unreasonably ment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it w interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, exi .'ti ng or proposed development; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion 3 b. That the design and location of the proposed development is in' keeping 9 with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detri- mental to the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this ordinance and the City Comprehensive Municipal Plan c. That the design and 1 ocati on of the ro osed devel o me :# would d r d P P p Wit.. pro e a desirable es i rabl a environment for its occupants , as well as for its neighbors, �. and that it is aesthetically )of good co.mpos i ti on," ma tera�l s , textures and colors, The Board in its recommended actions for approval may: a. Recommend any conditions that it deems reasonable to its action of approval, b. Recommend that the applicant, as a condition, provide guarantees that the conditions of approval will be complied with. r 5. The Sign Code requires that the developments having five or more tenants be covered under a Comprehensive si gnage plan for the building. Public Works Conside 1. Water and sanitary sewer are - available. Storm sewer is not available. 2. The Maplewood Drainage Plan proposes the construction of -a three acre foot holding pond on the site. This pond i to be located on the adjacent property to the south. 3. The proposed Ramsey County Thoroughfare Plan calls for Mi nnehaha Avenue to be widened to 86 feet. 4. The grading and drainage plan must provide for .culverts beneath driveways to maintain the ditch drainage, a maximum slope for the site of 3:1 , and piping from the adjacent l on the west to the proposed holding pond. This drain pipe will prevent the neighbor's yard from pond i ng . Filling the neighbor's yard may be an acceptable alternative to piping. 5. To allow the' property owner flexibility of future development of lots 9 and 10, the pondi ng easement need not be described at this time. Building Code Considerations r The convenience center complies with Building Code requirements with its setback. Public Safety Considerations 1 The convenience cneter may be placed on the l l i n e as shown provi - ded at the building is equi ped with an automatic sprinkler sys-tem. .A s 4 y 2. All exits should be right turn only. Presently Minnehaha and Century Avenues are very congested due to 3M traffic and have a high accident rate. Right turn only exits may cause some traffic from the to circle through the Margaret Avenue and Ferndale Street neighborhoods, but this is a preferred alternative to having an increased accident potential. Considerations From Other Agencies _ 1 r � The Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District has reviewed-and approved :this plan. 2 According to the District Soil Conservationist, development of the pro- posed plat would extensively alter the soil and water features of the site. The proposed location of the buildings is largely on unsuited soil material. The pond would be excavated in what is now the highest point of the land on the site. The watershed area contributing direct runoff to Tanners Lake would be increased. Based 'on the data reviewed, the following recommend- ations are made: a. Before fill is placed in the wetland area all organic material should be removed. b. The Maplewood Drainage Plan, prepared by Barr Engineering, calls for three acre /foot of storm water storage, on the site. This should be T provided. c. All runoff from the existing watershed area should be directed to the storage pond prior to entering the culvert under Century Avenue d. An outlet for watershed area 1B should be provided. e. The extensive amount of earth moving proposed on the site creates the potential for severe erosion. A great deal of sediment can be produced on the site with delivery directly to Tanners Lake. No sediment should be allowed to pass under Century Avenue . 3. Refer to the enclosed l etter from the Minnesota Department of Transportation. In a subsequent telephone conversation, the State revoked comment #3, ,but stated that a stop sign should be provided at this exit. 40 A permit must be obtained from the Department of Natural Resources for this development. Analysi s The drainage plan has been revised to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. According to State and County Engi neers, improvements on the two roads are tentati planned, but not for the near future. The applicant has explained that they will provide a 10 foot utility easement to Ramsey County for the wi;&ni ng of Minnehaha Avenue. If the driving surface of Mi nnehaba i s widened it sti not encroach onto the applicant's landscape area,�.ftwever, underground utilities may be installed here. 5 Staff does not favor commercial buildings being placed on a lot. line. In this case, however, there will only be open space adjacent to the building. If this abutting lot was developable near the building, Staff would -,not consider approving the zero setback. Z R Ore of the primary concerns with this proposal is in regards to Increased traffic congestion. Presently, Mi nnehaha and Century Avenues are very busy. during rash hours, due to 3M. It is obvious. that any new development i n the area wi 11 only increase traffic congestion further. It would be desirable to upgrade both roadways prior to any new development in the area, but realistically, road improvements are usually not provided until existing conditions warrant them. Staff will accept the applicant's site plan, as per curb cut place- ment, since they have been located as far away from the intersection as possible. Staff's only` °4eondi tion would be that all exits be right turn only. Recommendation Approval of the McDonalds and the convenience center buildings subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shal 1 fill and sod the adjacent property to the west. The fill is to prevent pond i ng on the adjacent parcel and is subject to approval by the City Engineer 2. Stop signs shall be placed at all exits 3* The parking stalls for the convenience center shall measure 10 by 20 f eet ' 4. The applicant shall provide evidence of the granting of a 10 foot easement to Ramsey County 5. Continuous concrete curbing shat 1 'be provided 6. Approval of design plans does not constitute approval of a building permit 7. All exterior building or roof top equipment and electrical transformers shall be screened in a decorative manner. Screening is subject to Staff approval 8. A comprehensive si gnage plan shall be submitted for Board approval for the convenience center 9.. applicant shall construct a three acre foot holding pond on lots 9 and 10 10 ." ; Th ere shall be no slope on the site exceeding a 3.1 ratio 11. The applicant shall install culverts beneath driveways to ma,i ntai n the existing ditch drainage 12. Site security lighting shal 1 be provided and shall be directed so not to cause any undue glare onto adjacent properties or roadways 101 13.* Additional landscaping shal 1 be provided along the west lot r 0 line and around the convenience center and shall be subject to Staff approval . The landscaping al ono the south side of the convenience center shall be .- revised to utilize more trees and less low growina shrubs. 14. If landscaping has not been installed by the time of occupancy, the applicant shall provide the City with an irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of 150% to guarantee the installation of landscaping. 15. All required plant materials that die shall be replaced b the applicant, p y pp 15. To ensure that a building will not be constructed too close to the convenience center, the applicant 'Shall provide the City with a slope easement 17. Trash enclosures shall be constructed of brick to match the buildings and shall have closeable gates 18. All exits from the site shall be right turn only. The site plan shall be revised with curb cuts designed to prohibit left turns from the site. This revision shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer. Enclosed 1. Location Map 2. Property Line Map 3. Letter from-the State's District Engineer dated 8 -14 -80 -4. Applicant's letter dated 8 -20 -80 5. Plans dated 8 -22 -80 _r 7 Ii � r ir A R ,r z r M A iKU KIE AD. Lid ac IVY O Troiler Court , P (Privoie) _ E. MARYLAND �. �v1T /97d, 120 31 - - - - -_, V -- - o� - ST wE 69 Beove/ WA 1iOLIA AVE. W � LoAe ° ~ Ea 3 ►.� z O 68 69 = 0 :CASE z HARVESTER o AVE. H — �.► A 32 W = 212 w �C' �L LA. BRAND AVE. 32 -S T. M. TTM Aly E. E. 7 TM AVE T 29 N Y ,w GUSH 5 25130 ti R22W 3d 31 R21W AVE. w ' > Q < 70 ?12 i i HANA AV' ! ! A PETITIONER RCE Corp Approval to construct Plc Donald's REQUEST .Restaurant Location Map i i 1 . 1 1 , f i 'KT j LI --� t < - �I l - 1 i!1 ' V F 1 - - 1 _ r i • � O 1 N ' i +Yr: PETITIONER RCE Corp. F pproval to construct McDonald's QUEST Restaurant Property Line Map Minnesota Department of Transportation District 9 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Box 2050 North St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 v August 14, 1980 j R Mr. Thomas E ks trand Associate Planner City of Maplewood Maplewood, MN 55109 (612) 770-2311 In reply refer to: 319 S.P. 6232 (T.H. 244) and S_.P. 6227 (T.H. 120) Commercial Development Dear Mr. Ekstrand: We have reviewed the above reference of commercial development as requested by your letter of August 7, • 198 and our comments are as follows: 1. The Mn /DOT easement at the southwest corner of Minnehaha and T.H. 120 presently assures .an unrestricted sight di stance. T•H• 120 is tentatively scheduled for improvement in the future, at which time this easement w i l l be used for road construction. 2. The outlet of the 12" storm sewer should go directly , into the on -site pond and not on T.H. 120 right of way, 3. This development should 4. It will be necessary to fore construction: a. Drainage permit b. Entrance permit c. Utility permit require a southbound } acceleration, 1 ane • obtain the following permits from this office be- 5. Mn /DOT traffic signals here are temporary. McDonal ds is a heavy traffic generator, however, it is usually at meal times - -7:00 to 8:30 am, 11:30 to 1 :00 pm and 4:30 to 6:00 pm. T.H. 120 at Mi nnehaha is very busy during morning and evening peak hours primarily because of 3M work trips; so there may be some tie -up during the am and pm peak hours. s _ Sincerely, Doug l H. Di fert, P Dist ct Engineer An Equal opportunity Employer iott 200 SILVER LAKE RD. SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114 636-0200 �GC Corpora t �r August 20, ipso _ ti Desig Review Board City of Maplewood Maplewood, Minnesota RE: Convenience Center and McDonalds Century at Minnehaha i Recommendati on Approval of the recommended fee schedule, effective January 1, 1 Action by Ccu o _ l:, Rcj er., D at e....- i M E M O R A N D U M • y i x TO: j �a City Manager : FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJEC 'f: Fees for Electrical Inspection DATE: September 5 , 1980 Enclosed is a memo from our electrical inspector requesting an increase in fees for 1981 and 1982. Mr. Petterson receives 80% of the fee charged, except for the State surtax. Those prices crossed out on the enclosed proposed fee schedule are the current fees. Also enclosed is a chart comparing the cu rrent fe sc hedule in Maplewood to those in four other cities. The fees shown for Burn svi 11 a and — Eagen are two years old. The proposed fee schedule has already been approved in North St. Paul , Little Canada, North Oaks, and Gem Lake where Mr. Petterson is also the electrical inspector. Mr. Petterson will be at the Council meeting to answer any questions. Recommendati on Approval of the recommended fee schedule, effective January 1, 1 Action by Ccu o _ l:, Rcj er., D at e....- i METROPOLITAN INSPECTION SERVICE INC. 2490 W OODBRI DGE STREET ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 (612) 484 -5633 June 24, 1980 Ex. Geoffery Olson _ director Of Community Development City Of Maplewood .1380 Frost Ave. Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mir. Olson: r Due to.a substantial increase in the cost of providing electrical. inspection, I am hereby requesting that the fee for electrical permits be increased to that of the en- closed fee schedule. My last request for a fee increase was two years ago, We provide electrical inspection for the following municipalities. Arden Hills Gene Lake Little Canada Maplewood North Oaks North St. Paul Roseville Town Of White Bear White Bear Lake Some of these municipalities put the present rate into effect on October 15, 1978, and some on January 1, 19 79. Having different effective dates creates a for us. I am therefore requesting that all of the municipalities which we provide electrical inspection for, make- the proposed rates effective as . of January 1, 1981. It is my intention to have these new rates in effect until January 1, 1983 Sincerely, r� 1 Gunnar Pettersen Electrical Inspector - GP /vl R , e ✓'s e4 J .. The State "c"ha'r an . additional c supervisor fee o • . which pays for supervisory y - n each perm.�t P y perso This in tern the State in$pectors o#' r relieves certain duties es such as r" Inv . wiring related com lain .. estlatirw plaints for Ci.tlz ens . Follow u == , correction .orders not eom leted P on P on time Fil complaints in Court and appearances in C -. I have Court etc, As a Municipal c i al Inspector e to . perform these duties m P pecto� . , .. yse f . The State .'Zoard - also charges an annual f • license and: - �o� ��al fee for all Electrlc�al:s 1 Electrical Contractors ' brings in a substa _ tha licenses. This ntlal- amount of revenue their adm�.n,i s trati on co t helps pay • - Sts • For this reason the St .�s able to compensate the Ins pectors . ate Board 80� of th spectors at a higher rate than e permit fee. As '*part of o� . ' . • r service we also bear the cost of r' i o nspection stickers, per mit fo p inti.ng other p rms, correction order form for�as .used in connection wi s and th� providing inspection . We also print up fee schedules and ma them -to ab.out 200 Electrical Contractors in the Twin . City area We-also bearAhe cost of attending Semi ' and and ' State Inspectors leave at meetings 9 :00 AI�I and cannot be reach ring the day. We use a p agin g reached su en P g ng. sys and employ a Se cr e tare.,- at our ex p se so we are accessible as neede . -_- d, during the rtxv • Y PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE FOR ELECTRICAL PERMITS (a) Minimum fee for each separate inspection of an install- ation, replacement, alteration or repair limited to one inspect - C, i on on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . s . . . . . . . . . . . . . * 6 t Q V 8 t8900 (b) services, changes of service, temporary services, additions, alterations, or repairs on either primary or- second- ary services shall be computed separately. Y' 0 th 100 ampere capacity .............................. 8T88l 000 101 = and including 200 ampere capacity, 9 9 o a 9 *�12TQQ $16,,00 For-'each-additional 100 ampere capacity or fraction th er eof ......................... .......................45T80 -- .00 (c) Circuit, installations of, additions, alterations or repairs of each circuit or sub - feeder, shall be computed separately, including circuits fed from sub - feeders and includi the equipment served, except as provided for in i P items (d through 0 to and including 30 ampere cap 8 $3o2 2 P Y � 5 (maximum number of 0 to 30 ampere circuits to be paid -on is 30 to any one cabinet), 31'' and including 100 ampere capacity... $5000 For each additional 100 ampere capacity or fraction thereof : .......... . .................:.... . .............2T88 t2e5 (d) Maximum fee on a single family dwelling hall not • g exceed $49rog $50900 if not over 200 ampere capacity# This includes service, feeders, circuits, fixtures and equipment. The maximum fee provides for not more than two rough -in inspections and the final inspection per dwelling: Additional inspections at the re- inspection rate. (e) Maximum fee on an apartment building shall not exceed $28T88 125.00 per dwelling unit for the first 20 units and $.15T98 1 20-00 per dwelling unit for the balance of the units. A two- unit dwelling, (duplex) maximum fee per unit as per single family dwelling. (f) The maximum number of 0 to 3 0 amp ere circuits to be P paid on any one Athletic Field lighting standard is ten. (g) In addition to the above fees: (1) A charge of $1.00 will be made for each street lighting standard. (2) A charge of $2.00 will be made for each traffic signal standard. Circuits originating within the standard will not be used when computing fees. (h) In additiofi to the above fees, all transformers and generators for light heat and power shall be computed separately at'�3 *8 A 14900 per unit plus I50 per KVA up to and - including 100' KVA. 101 KVA and over at I8¢ per KVA. -The maximum fee for any transformer or generator in this category is $39TO . -1- (i) In addition to the above fees all transformers for sins and outline lighting shall be computed at $3.00 for the first 500 VA or fraction thereof per unit, plus 30¢ for each additional 100 VA or fraction thereof. Q) In addition to the above fees (unless included in the maximum fee filed by the initial installer) remote cor��rol, signal circuits and circuits of less than 50 volts shall be computed at $IzeOO per each ten openings or devices of each system .plus $1,00 fob each additional ten or fraction thereof. - (k) For the review of plans and specifications of proposed irrs there shall be a minimum fee of X100.00 up to and including X30,000 of electrical estimate, plus 1 /10 of 1% on any amount in excess of $30,000 to be paid by persons or firms request - ing the review. {Z) When re- inspection is necessary to determine whether unsafe conditions have been corrected and such conditions are no subject of an appeal pending before any court, a re- inspection fee of $6,-8A 8;00 may be assessed in writing by the inspector. (m) For not covered herein, or for requested special inspections or services, the fee shall be $12r@g 114.00 per man hour, including travel time, plus 16¢ per mile traveled plus the rea- sonable cost of equipment or material. consumed. This section is also applicable to inspection of empty conduits and such jobs as determined by the city. (n) For inspection of transient projects including but not limited to carnivals and circuses the inspection fees shall be computed as follows: Power supply units ac cording to item (b) of the Fee Schedule . A like fee will be required on power sup ly units at each en 12TQs 14.00 per hour a will be ement durin the season p a fee •f except that g � g , charged for additional time spent by the p ower supply inspector, if the 1 � � P pp y is not ready for inspection at the time and date specified on the request for inspection as required by law. Rides, Devices or Concessions: Shall be ins ected at their first rst appearance of the season and the l.nspectlon fee shall be $6 :88 V-00 per unit. -2- With l�lPCfr.'c Ra�ye avid eo C 44 O a O O 1� O to s a � Q � r o � M • O O O d Q �S s O O O O n• 1 1 0�3 0 CO Q C O G C a•� � With l�lPCfr.'c Ra�ye avid eo C 44 tj Ll - � a l6 �� ffwP Serv�'t e �ric e RGn and '� �o O a O O 1� O to s tj Ll - � a l6 �� ffwP Serv�'t e �ric e RGn and '� �o August 29, 1980 To : Ci ty Manager Barry from: Director of Public S Computerization of STAFF REPORT Evans Safety Richard W. Schaller Police Record System Action by Co nc. i o /') ' '1 u i t; C Proposal It is proposed that the Council re-- endorse the concept of a computerized police record and management system, authorize the expenditure of 1980 budgetary funds to begin implementation and formalize this department's participation in P .0 . S . S . E ,° (Police Operation Support System Elementary) coordinated through the Criminal Justice Reporting System for the State of Minnesota. Background Recognizing the direction of modern law enforcement practices, we began in mid -1978 to plan and budget resources for the installation of a computerized record and management system for our department. Faced with increased budgetary limitations, the need to deploy public safety personnel and equip- ment in strategic areas and to provide rapidly retrievable support information producing maximum potential becomes imperative. The progress in computerized record and management systems design for law enforcement has been slow, especially regarding medium and small size depart- ments and lacked comprehensive planning between police agencies. This situation has now changed in Minnesota within the last eight months when the Criminal Justice Reporting System section of the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension undertook a project to bring the P . 0 . S . S . E . computerized record and management system to Minnesota. We cannot help but feel this action on the part of the State was motivated by some law enforcement agencies' efforts on their own to develop such a system. In coordination with representatives from twenty law enforcement agencies, each respective module of P.O.S.S.E. was redeveloped to meet the needs of Minnesota. We took an active role in this development, and from our experience with other systems, feel P .0. S . S .E . will be an excellent system. The Masys Corporation was retained by the State of Minnesota as the consultant to write the programs and adapt the implementation of this system to work in conjunction with and in support of the present Criminal Justice Reporting System. Our department has been selected, along with the Brooklyn Park and Fridley Police Departments, to be the first test sites in Minnesota for this system. iditionally, the State of Minnesota has awarded the hardware equipment bid to Jele-Terminals, Incorporated, who will furnish Texas Instrument computers. All cif the equipment will be leased, including maintenance contracts =, to each parti- cipating agency through the I.S.B. of the State of Minnesota for` five years Our 1980 budget has authorized expenditures in the following areas dedicated to computerization of our police record system: 121 -4430 Maintenance $ 1 121-4480 Computer Program Design 5 121 -4520 Computer Terminal Lease 6 $12,600.00 The projected 1980 costs for the implementation of this system within our department, beginning in October, will be: -3 Hardware Rental .. October $1 November 1 December 1,070.00 $3, 210.00 One -Time 1980 Costs Installation $ 700.00 !' Shipping Charges 500.00 Secondary Storage Discs 500.00 Total $4 The. projected costs for the remaining five years will be $13,500 per year plus a one -time cost of $2,000 sometime during those five years for the develop- ment of the software package. The Director of the Criminal Justice Reporting System has requested a letter from the City of Maplewood confirming our participation within the testing phase and the total P . 0 . S . S . E . system, Recommendation It is recommended that the Council re- endorse the concept of a computerized police record and management system, authorize the expenditure of 1980 budgetary funds in the amount of $4,910-00 to begin implementation and formalize the depart- ment' s present and continued participation in the P .0 . S . S . E . system. RWS:js cc Record System File Lieutenant Cusick i V t v MEMORANDUM TO City Manager �, FROM Finance Director /_._- .�'��_. -- Annual Audit - 1980 [ATE September 8, 1980 r' DeLaHunt, Voto & Company, our present auditing firm, has presented for approval and execution the attached agreement for auditing services for the City's Fiscal year ending December 31, 1980. The proposed agreement reflects an increase in hourly rates that will increase the audit cost to approximately $17,614. This is $1,550 or 9.7/ greater than the 1979 audit bill. DeLaHunt, Voto & Company has provided Maplewood with satisfactory auditing 'services since 1967. The firm is experienced in municipal audits and presently has approximately twelve other governmental bodies as clients including the cities of White Bear Lake, South St. Paul, Stillwater, New Brighton, Shoreview and Oakdale. Therefore, it is recommended that staff be authorized to execute an agree- ment with DeLaHunt, Voto & Company for the 1980 audit. onn . t •... s r t J "3. R DELAHUNT VOTO & CO., LTD. CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS Birch Lake Professional Building • 1310 E. Hwy. 96 • White Bear Lake, MN 55110 • Phone 426 -3263 august 12, 1980 RONALD J. DELAHUNT, CPA ROBERT J. VOTO, CPA TIMOTHY E. REARDON, CPA PATRICK J. BARRETT, CPA ROBERT G. TAUTGES, CPA Mr. Dan Faust, Finance Director City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55i09 Dea r' Dan: Enclosed are two copies of our standard Agreement for Audi ti ng /Account i ng Services for 1980/1981. This con -tract is similar to last years contract except for rate changes necessitated by general economic factors. Upon the approval of this agreement by your Council and execution, please return one, copy to our office and retain the other copy for your files. You r early consideration of this contract will assist us in preparing our 1980/1981 audit schedule and w i l l be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call, Very truly yours, DE LA HUNT VOTO CO. LTD, Robert J. Voto, CPA RJV /sh enc /2 cc: Correspondence F i le i w T: i MEMBERS OF AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS • PRIVATE COMPANIES PRACTICE SECTION MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION • MINNESOTA ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL BUSINESS OFFICIALS AGREEMENT FOR AUDI TI NG /ACCOUN T I NG SERVI CES This agreement by and between the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD $ MI NNE SOTA, hereafter referred to as the "City ", and the accounting firm of DE LA HUNT VOTO �- after referred to as the "Auditors ", W 1 THE SSETH : CO., LTD., herein mutual covenants and agreements as he rei nafter - n consideration of their r _ set firth, the parties hereto contract and agree as follows: 1. The Auditors • perform an audit of the. f i nanci a 1 statements and agree to p transactions of the City for tte year ended December 31, 1980. Such audit and examination shall be made in accorance with genera accepted auditing standards and ' the minimum audit p roc edures p rescribed by the Minnesota State Auditor pur- to the provisions p s i on s ., P of M S A Ch 6. Such audit and examination w i l l suant - ii nclude tests of the accounting records and such other audit procedures as are • a o enable the Auditors to render an opinion on the fairness cons de red necessary ry t of the City s financial statements. it is not contemplated that the audit will be a detailed examination of all transactions nor that the audit will necessarily discover mi , s- conduct should any exist. The Auditors-will, however, promptly inform the C i t y any findings which appear unusual or abnorma y 2. i The Auditor's report and management comments shall be addressed to the City Counci . 9 ' 1 Such management comments shall contain specific disclosure and recommendations with regard to the following: s (a} Non conformity w it h p olicy o 1 i c y and p rocedures res p rest r i bed by Council _ t Action, State Statutes, and /or Federal Rules and Regulations* b Non-conformity to genera accepted governmental accounting principles. K (c) Defects in accounting policies and procedures that make accounting and /or auditing time consuming and /or inefficient. (d ) Any failure of the accounting department to prepare and d i st r i bute financial reports required or needed for administrative purpose. i. (e) An Y other information deemed appropriate of City Council cons i derat i on. 3. The 1980 Annual F i n a n c i a l Report of the City shall be prepared in accordance with generally accepted account ng p r i n c i p l e s and the "Minimum Reporting Requirements 'City F i n a n c i a l Reporting" prepared and issued by the Office of the Minnesota State Auditor. Should the City require assistance in preparing and compiling its financial data and records to meet these requirements, the Auditors agree to assist the City as required and as determined jointly by the Auditors and City Administration, Fees for such services (if required) shall be billed on the basis of the hourly rates contained herein, but shall be b i l l e d separate from audit fees. 4 0 The City herewith engages the Audi tors for the work he rei nbefore specified and agrees to pay the Auditors on the basis of: Partner $50.00 @ Hour Audit Supervisor/Manager $ 38.00 C@ Hou r Stuff Auditors: Senior $28.00 @ Hour Semi-Senior $22.00 @ Hour Junior $18.00 @ Hour Intern $16.00 @ Hou r -Statistical Typists and Report Processors $13.00 0 Hour ;Charge per Copy of F i nanci al Statements $12.00; 0 Copy x 5. shall provide the City with detailed statements as to the f 0 The Auditors p . classifications • • cations and hours worked. Payment of the Auditor's fees shall be made by • - days after submittal 1 of an itemized i zed c 1 a i m correctly showing the C it y w ithin th � n thirty y _ the amount due the Auditors* lip • e submitted for payment upon completion of the � ai ms for payment will b s P interi m audit; upon cop m l et i on of the f i n a l field work; and upon completion of the entire audit and submittal 1 of the Annua 1 F i n a n c i a l Report and the Auditor's Management Comments and Recommendations thereon. 6. if any, c ircumstances disc 1 used by the audit and examination c a l l for a more necessary detailed investigation than would be y under ordinary circumstances, such circumstance will be called to the attention of the City authorities before pro- . investigation* on teed � ng further with such i nvest i g t � . I f authorized to proceed further wi an for these a d d i t i o n a l services shall be at investigation i n the s ar ea compensation th e regular rates designated in this agreement. N WITNESS WHEREOF, the C i t y and the Auditors have executed this agreement the day and year written below. DE LA HUNT VOTO & CO. , LTD* Certified Public Accountants. B / 41 Robert J. Voto, Vice - President Date: CITY OF MAPLEWQOD , MINNESOTA By Mayo r Date: By Clerk Date: a S t ■ i ..r September 9, 1980 MEMORANDUM To: City Manager Barry Evans From: Director of Public Safety R. W. Schaller Sqbject: Implementation of 911 Telephone Service in Maplewood The undersigned attended a Ramsey County 911 Planning Committee at Roseville City Hall at 10:00 a.m. on September 5, 1980. The main agenda items were plan approval, tariff filing and cost presentation. The current plans call for four (4) Public Safety Answering Points (PSAP) in Ramsey County. They are. 1. Ramsey County Sheriff's Department 2. Maplewood Public Safety Center 3. St. Paul Police and Fire Departments 4. White Bear Lake Police Department A discussion of cost allocations started with Ramsey County network installation costs. These total $252,546 estimated at current Northwestern Bell tariff rates in effect through 1983. The Ramsey County Board has indicated it will assume these costs and plans to spread them over the 1981 and 1982 budgets equally. Recurring annual costs network will be paid by the State of Minnesota as per statute. This leaves the installation and recurring costs of equipment at each PSAP the responsibility of the local unit of government responsible for the answering point. Under our cost listing on page two of the attached estimates we are offered several levels of service. The basic system with automatic number identification (ANI) the dispatcher will get a visual (video) display of the phone number of the caller (see page seven of attached) . The more desirable system being recommended is to also include automatic location identification (ALI) . This feature would allow the inclusion of the caller's name and street name and number plus special information such as disabled people at the resi- dence, etc. On page two of the attached, -you will find a projection of the estimated costs for Maplewood Public Safety PSAP, The ANI only system would cost Maplewood an estimated $8,675 installation costs on a one -time basis and recurring costs of an estimated $505 per month. For the addition of ALI system, the added costs are estimated at $12,124 installation costs and an added estimated recurring cost of $567 per month. At the meeting, we were given a time schedule as follows: October 15, 1980 - deadline to advise telephone company of - level of service desired December 15, 1982 - system implementation of system use and start of billing January 1983 - payment due for installation costs and start of monthly recurring cost billings 0 The City of North St. Paul will be participating in our 911 system on a . full -time basis. We have started preliminary discussions with them on their participation in the costs. Staff recommends that the City Council consider authorizing ordering the equipment for ANI and ALI capability. I have discussed this with Joint Fire Chiefs Council, and they concur. a RWS : j s cc Deputy Chief Hagen 4, 911 File Fire Marshal Chief Langeslay 'odor_. -�..� f a L1� 1.'ii ..r r , Page 1 RAMSEY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT. PSAP (Five 911 Lines) Cost Per Ins talla- Recurring Costs Q uan tity Equipment Item tion Costs Rate/M60 Annual ANI Master Controller $ 7 $ 300 $ � $ 365 $ 4 _ (4 lines) = 1 ANI Auxiliary Controller 1, 825 1 825 93 1 1 Trunk* equipment for auxiliary 560 560 28 . 336 controller - - _ 3 ANI Display units 650 1 69 828 i. 1 Teleprinter 75 75 94 1 TOTAL WITH ANI,.. $10 t 410 $11 9 710 $ 649 I $. 7, 788 1 ALI Master Controller. $9 $9,540 $ 445 $ 5 3 ALI Display units ... _ . 1 3 180 2 160 3 ALI Display wiring 102. < 306 3 36 TOTAL ALI COSTS $10 $13 $ 628 $ 7 536 TOTAL (ANI AND ALI) $21 - $ 25 126 $ 1 277 =_- 5 • .... r +ter IS ' (Assumes current answering a ui ment will q P b be - �re�ained and current . emergency .ine seiw1ce can be „ - te'fminated: )'`" ''� Page 2. RAMSEY COUNTY MAPLEWOOD POLICE DEPT. PSAP (Three 911 lines) (Assumes current answering equipment will be retained and current, emergency line service can be terminated.) r .i Cost Per Installa— i'• rring Costs 4. g uan tv t� Equipment Item tion Costs Rates /Mo. Annual 1 1, ANI Master Controller $ 7 $ 7 $ 365 $4,380 2 ANI Display and transfer unit .650 1 46 552 1 Teleprinter 75 75 94 1,120 TOTAL WITH ANI s $ 8 $ 8 $ 505 $ 6 1 ALI Master Controller $ 9 $ 9 $ 445 $ 5 2 ALI Display unit 1 2 120 1 2 ALI Display wiring _ 102 204 2 24 TOTAL ALI COSTS $10,832 $12 $ 567 $ 6 TOTAL (ANI AND ALI) $18,857 $20,799 $ 1 $12 (Assumes current answering equipment will be retained and current, emergency line service can be terminated.) r .i RAMSEY COUNTY ST. PAUL PO LIC E AN D FIRE DEPARTMENTS (Seven 911 Lines}, Page 3 . _ Cost Per Installa- Recurring Costs Quantity Equipment Item tion Costs Rate /Mo Annual 1 ANI Master Controller C4 lines) $ 7 $ 7 $ 365 $ 4 1 ANI Auxiliary Controller �.. Cr3 lines) :- 1,825 1 93 1 1 Trunk Equipment for Auxiliary controller 560 560 28 336 ' 7 Display & Transfer unit 1 for fire) 650 4 161 1 2 s Teleprinter C1 f or f ire) 75 150 188 2 TOTAL WITH ANI $10 $14 $ 835 $10,020 1 ALI Master Controller (3 displays) 9 9 445 5 1 ALI'Auxiliary controller (4 displays) 945 945 48 576 7 ALI Display unit 1 8 420 5 7 ALI Display wiring 102 714 7 - 84 TOTAL ALI COSTS ' $11,777 ,19,529 920 $11,040 TOTAL (ANI & ALI) $22 $33_,914 $1,755 $21,060 (Assumes current answering equipment will be retained and current emergency line service can be terminated.) } Y • Page 4 . RAMSEY COUNTY WHITE BEAR LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT PSAP - (Three 911 lines) . 3 T 6 ost Per Installa- : Recurring Costs - Q uantit y Equipment_ Item tion Costs Rate /Mo . Annual 1 ANI Master Controller $ 7 $ 7,300 $ 365 $ 4,380 2 ANI Display and Trans - fer unit 650 1 46 552 1 Teleprinter 75 75 94 1,128 TOTAL with ANI $ 8 $ 8 $ 505 $ 6 1 ALI Master controller 9,540 9 445 5 �( 2 ALI Display units 1 2 120 1,440 2 ALI Display wiring 102 204 2 24 TOTAL ALI COSTS $10 $12,124 $ 567 $ 69804 r h TOTAL (ANI & ALI) $18 857 $20 $1 $12 . r a (Assumes current answering equipment will be retained and current emergency .r line service can be terminated) fZ/ R A M S E Y C 0 11 N T Y 9 1 1 C O S T S TERMS ALL = Automatic Location Identification AI�I -- Automatic Number Identification 'SAP = Public Safety AnswPYinp- Pain SR = Selective Routing Mainstation = working; Telephone Number • ' :Y1 1G • t ' M '' . X41; Total 2,181 42,574 3 31,335 18,961 33,043 21, 780 i 7 22 ,101 62,512 21. 141, 479 1 106,860 NU i`fI l : j: O �� CIA T i1 S TA'f IONS IN P S.'d' (19 /J in Telephone kph 1 � .. 13c : r Cou�zty E:�char. e St _ Pau Shcrif f �' 1 t% Spring >�-� _k: Sp rit g l k e Par � 9?.5 29181. 20, °8] 9U/ • R ice t 7.5 l b93 � 35 1 65 _ 1,468 2 % 5 White Bear 80 2.5 0o8 20 h , 26 7 100 % 100% Midway J Humboldt iQ 1, 896 6.5 , 12, 3? 5 25 4, 7�+ 100/ A Be _ch 90 29,739 ] n 3 65% Maplewood 65. 14 35 7 451 Par'Li Row /North St. Paul 50 3 15 1 35 2 100% Cleveland 22,401 100% :Market 62, 512 10021' Einer.son 215947 TOTAL SR 21 2 74,755 42,574 TOT NON SR 0 0 84 22 ,401 TERMS ALL = Automatic Location Identification AI�I -- Automatic Number Identification 'SAP = Public Safety AnswPYinp- Pain SR = Selective Routing Mainstation = working; Telephone Number • ' :Y1 1G • t ' M '' . X41; Total 2,181 42,574 3 31,335 18,961 33,043 21, 780 i 7 22 ,101 62,512 21. 141, 479 1 106,860 ESTIMATE OF COSTS IN(AIRRE.A.) BY PSAP.. J 4 SR and ANT. Network 0 ALI Network 3 PSAP EcLu ANI only 6 ANI and ALI 12,864 �f 0 432 0 44 0 14,760 6,060 1.2 10,020 21,060 7,784 15, 324 *'Costs paid by state 62 per statute 29 , 928 62.1.1? White Bear Network Costs Maplewo Lake St. P aul She Tc� tal SR and ANI Installation ; 0 0 0 0 ' -� *Assessed to Ramsey ALI Installation 5,2-0 750 59,15 20 86,075 County on basis of Less 20% (DOT grant) 4,200 600 47,300 16,760 68,860 populAtion $252,546 estimate PS�Equipment I ANI only 8 8,675 _14 , 38 5 11. � 43 445 Land ALI 20,799 20,799 33 25,126 100 Total Installation 2 1 4 9 999 �, 399 81, 214 41 ' 169,498 Costs — _ - --- -_ �- -- s — Recur rin Annual Costs ; SR and ANT. Network 0 ALI Network 3 PSAP EcLu ANI only 6 ANI and ALI 12,864 �f 0 432 0 44 0 14,760 6,060 1.2 10,020 21,060 7,784 15, 324 *'Costs paid by state 62 per statute 29 , 928 62.1.1? Technicat a F`atu bu (3) In the approved p l a n , the Committee recommends the in- corporat i on of the following features and service require- ments: Grade of Service The system has been designed so that 99 amt of every 100 cal Is Placed to a primary answering point w i l l be completed, during periods of norma 1 act i v i ty. . The consulting engineer has determined the number of dedicated trunks that will be necessary to deliver this grade of service between all points in the system. Selective Routing The 911 telephone calls from the Spring Lake Park, Rice, Midway, Beech, Maplewood, Humboldt,.White Bear Lake, and North St. P a u l telephone exchanges wi 1 1 be automatically selectively routed so that these-calls w i l l be answered at the appropriate primary answering points. This feature was rec- ommended for those densely populated te'1 ephone exchanges served by more than l primary. answering point. Automatic Number Identification (ANI)_ As an a i d to p u b l i c safety dispatching, the seven- digit telephone number of a party calling 911 w i l l be d i s p l a y e d on a device at the primary answering point. This feature w i l l be available only on s i n g l e and two -party lines. The Committee a l s o recommends that equipment be provided to auto- matically print this information as it is received. This w i l l ensure that the information is not lost • before the communications personnel can copy it down. Automatic Location I d e n t i f i c a t i o n (ALI) This feature is s t i l l being devel by the B e l l System. I t wi l l make i t poss ible for the party calling 911 to have h i s . 1 oca t i on a u t o m a t i c a l l y i d e n t i f i e d at the primary answering point (street name and number) . The Committee recommends the addition of this feature, as soon as it becomes available. The configuration plan in Appendix A describes a number of other features designed to enhance the effectiveness of communications operations at the primary answering point. - -• - -- i a _ y . Northwestern Bell T 706 2nd Avenue South, 500 Baker Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 May 29, 1980 Mr. Jim B k e n s. Chair 911 chni cal Operating Commi Sl oo ngton min . Of, i ce 22 W 01 hakopee Rd 8 oomi n gto n , MN Dear Jim: Enclosed is an advanced copy of Northwestern B e l l ' s tariff Tor Enhanced Universal Emergency Number Service (E911). The actual f i l i n g of this tariff with the Minnesota Public Servi ce Commission is planned for June 20, 1980. The rates and charges illustrated in the tariff are the rates and charges that w i l l be filed with the Commission. �.. The rules and regulations, conditions, • rates and charges contained in this tariff wi be subject to final approval by the Commission. I have also included a revised, first of the year main station count of telephone numbers by central - offi ces . The actual main station count for billing computation will be determined at the time of 911 installation. I will' be looking forward to our meeting on Tuesday, June 3, to reyi ew this further. Sincerely, Warren Bosch Systems Manager - .911 ••-cc; Roanne Ehrlich R 911 Planning Coordinator . Metropolitan Council Suite 300 Metro Square Bldg, St. Paul, MN 55101 r Attachment B Page 1 of 11 ILLUSTRATIVE TARIFF — E911 SERVICE - Z- . �r ENHANCED UNIVERSAL RCENCY NUMBER SERVICE (E911) G . I. Enhanced Universal Emergency Number Service, also referred to as Enhanced 911 Service or E911, is a telephone. exchange communication . service whereby a Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) designated by the custaaer m-ay receive telephone calls dialed to the telephone number 911. E911. Sevvice includes lines and equipment necessary for the answering, transferring and dispatching of public emergency telephone calls originated by persons within the serving area who dial 911. 2. Enhanced 911 Service is offered subject to availability of f acilities * 3. The E911 customer may be a municipality or other state or local governmental unit, or an authorized agent of one or more municipalities or other state or local governmental units . to whom authority has been lawfully delegated. The customer must be legally authorized to subscribe to the service and have public safety responsibility by law to respond to telephone calls from the public for emergency police, fire or other emergency services within the telephone central office areas arranged for 911 calling. DEFINITION OF TERMS Alternate Routing (AR) A feature provided to allow E911 calls to be routed to ^ a designated alternate location if (1) all E911 exchange lines to the primary PSAP (see definition of PSAP below) are busy, or (2) the primary PSAP closes down for a period (night. service). This is a. standard feature of E911 Service. Automatic Location Identification (ALI): A feature by which the address associated with the calling party's telephone number (identified by ANI as defined below) is forwarded to" the PSAP for display. Automatic Number Identification (ANI) A feature by which the calling party's ANI telephone number is forwarded to the E911 Control office and to the PSAP' s Display and Transfer Units. T Data Managem nt System (DMS)_ A system of manual procedures and_ computer programs used to create, store and, update the data required to provide the Selective Routing (SR) and ALI features. Default Routin (DR) A feature activated when an incoming E911 call _ y , garbled :digits or cannot be selective) routed due to an ANI failure other causes. Such incoming calls are .routed from the E911 Control office to a default PSAP. Each incoming E911 facility group to the Control office is assigned to a designated default PSAP. This is a standard feature of E91.1 Service. Attachment B Page 2 of 11 Display and Transfer Unit A selector console and associated coon i� for displaying ANI numbers at, the FSAP attendant position and doed by the attendant to activate Fixed and /or Selective Transfer ffnctions . End Office: The Central Office(s) in the E911 System which receive • originating E911 calls. Enhanced 911 (E911) Control Office: The office providing tandem switching capability for E911 calls. It controls switching of ANI information to the FSAF and also provides the SR feature, standard ESS Speed Calling features, call transfer capability and certain maintenance functions for each PSAP, ' Enhanced 911 Service Area: The geographic area in which the customer will respond to all £911 calls dispatch appropriate emergency assistance. ' Fixed Transfer A feature which enables a PSAP attendant to transfer incoming E911 calls to secondary PSAPs by use of a single button on the Display and Transfer Unit, Forced Disconnect: A function of the E911 Central Office trunk circuit which enables the PSAP attendant to release a connection even though the calling party has not hung up. This feature prevents the i ng of the E911 exchange lines and is a standard feature of E911 Service. Idle Tone Application A feature which allows the PSAP attendant to distinguish between calls that have been abandoned before they are answered and calls where the calling party is unable to speak for some reason. If the caller abandoned the line before the PSAP attendant answered, a distinct tone is heard by the attendant. If the caller is still on the line but unable to speak, no tone will be heard. This is , a standard feature of E911 Service. Manual Transfer A feature that enables the PSAP attendant to transfer an incoming call by depressing the switchhook of the associated telephone or the "add" button on the Display and Transfer Unit and dialing either a 7— digit or 10 —digit telephone number or a 2 —digit Speed Calling Code, Manual Transfer is associated with the E911 trunk unit and is a standard feature of E911 Service. Punic Safety Answe • y ng Point (PSAP) An answering location for - 911 ca11s originating in a given area. A FSAP may be designated as Primary or Secondary, which refers to the order in which calls are directed for answering. Primary PSAPs respond first; Secondary PSAPs receive galls on a transfer basis only. PSAPs are public service agencies such as police, fire or emergency medical or a coon bureau serving a group of such entities. Selective Routing (SR): A feature that routes an E911 call from a Central Office to the designated primary PSAP based upon the identified n =ber of the calling party. • Attachment B • Page 3 of 11 60M Selective Transfer: A feature providing persons at the PSAP the- ability to transfer an inconing call to another agency by depressing a single s__ button labelled with the type of agency, e.g., "Fire �" on the DiZplay and Transfer Unit. This type of transfer is only available when the= SR �- :teature is provided. Serving Central Office The Central Office from which a PSAP, either primary or secondary, is served. Universal Emergency Number Service A telephone exchange communication service for receiving telephone calls placed b y persons in need of assistance who dial the number 911. Such calls are answered at PSA.Ps established and operated by the customer. The lines and equipment associated 'With the service arrangement for the answering, transferring and dispatching of public emergency telephone calls are included. Universal Emergency Number Service Customer: A municipality or oth r state or local gover en tal unst or an authorized agent of one or more municipalities or other state or local governmental units to whom authority has been lawfully delegated within a defined geographic area to respond to public emergency telephone calls, at the minimum for police and fire service. RULES AND REGULATIONS I. This service is limited to the use of Central Office telephone number 91 1 as the universal emergency telephone number. Only one E911 service will be provided vi thin any government agency's locali t . F 2. The 911 emergency telephone number is not intended as a total replacement for the telephone service of the various public safety agencies which participate in the use of this number. The public safety agencies rill subscribe to other exchange telephone service as provided in Section of this tariff. 3. The service is furnished to the customer only for the purpose of receiving reports of emergencies by the public. 4. E911 Service is classified as Business Exchange Service and is arranged for one -way incaming service to the appropriate PSAP. Outgoing calls can only be made on a transfer basis. 3 E911 Service is provided solely for the benefit of the customer operating the ?SAP. The provision of E911 Service by the. Telephone Company shall not be interpreted construed, or regarded, either expressly or implied, as being for the benefit of or creatin - an � Y Telephone Company obligation toward any third person or legal-entity other than , the. cus tamer. b. The Telephone Company does not undertake to answer and forward 911 calls, but furnishes the use of its facilities to enable the customer's personnel to respond to such calls on the customer's pre-=is es . Attachment B Page 4 of 11 7. Terminal equipment as offered in the appropriate sections of- this Tariff may be provided by the Telephone C=pany for use with. this service. Temporary suspension - service is not provided for any part of the E911 Service. 9. E911 inf ormation consisting of the names, addresses and telephone numbers of telephone customers whose listings are not published in directories or listed in Directory Assistance Offices is confidential. Information will be provided on a call -by -call basis only for the purpose of responding to emergency calls. 10. The E 911 calling party forfeits the privacy afforded by non -- listed and non - published service to the "tent that the telephone number, address and name associated with the originating station location are furnished to the PSA.P. 11. Central Offices that are not currently equipped to transmit AINI will not be modif i.ed to provide ANI just for E911 Service. When the Selective Routing feature is provided, in such circumstances, Default Routing nd Central office identification x be g pr in li eu of Selective Routing and ANI Display. ` 12. ANI will not be displayed on calls placed over four -party or rural lines. ' 13. The Telephone Company's entire liability to any person for interruption or failure of E911 Service shall be lin.ited to the terms set forth in this section and other sections of this Tariff. 14. The rates charged for E911 Service do not contemplate the inspection or constant monitoring of facilities to discover errors, defects and malfunctions in the service, nor does the Company undertake such responsibility. The customer shall make such operational tests as, in the judgment of the cus tamer, are required to determine whether the system is functioning properly for its use. The customer shall promptly notify the Telephone Company in the event the system is not functioning properly. 15. The Telephone Company's liability for any loss or damage arising from errors, interruptions, defects, failures, or malfunctions of this service or any part thereof whether caused by the negligence of the Telephone Company or otherwise shall not exceed the greater of $50.00 .� or an amount equivalent to the pro rata charges for the s ervice affected during the period of time that the service was fully,'-or partially inoperative. These limited damages shall be in adds, Lion to any credit which may be given for an out -of- service condition. Attachment B • Page S of 11 16. Each customer agrees to release, idemnify, defend and hold li_armless the Telephone Company from any and all loss , claims , demand; _ -, suits or other action, or any liability whatsoever, whether suffered, made == instituted or asserted by the cus tomer or by an other art � y P y or 3 person, for any personal injury to or death of any person or persons , or for any loss, damage or destruction of any property, whether owned by the customer or others. 17. The customer also agrees to release, indemnify and hold harmless the Telephone Company for any infringement or invasion of the right of privacy of any person or persons caused or claimed to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the installation, operation, failure to operate, maintenance, removal, presence, condition, occasion or use of E911 service features and the equipment associated therewith, or by any services furnished by the Telephone Company in connection therewith, including, but not limited to, the identification of the telephone number, address or name associated with the telephone used -by the party or parties accessing 911 service hereunder, and which arise out of the negligence or other wrongful act of the Telephone Company, the customer, its user, agencies or municipalities, or the employees or agents of any one of them. 18. The Telephone Company's intent will be to provide at least the same � `J level of service reliability and quality as the telephone service being provided in the exchanges where E91.1 is offered. 19. Because the Telephone Company serving boundaries and political subdivision boundaries may not coincide, 'it is the obligation of the customer to make arrangements to handle all E911 calls that originate from telephones served by Central Offices in the local service area whether or not the calling telephone is situated on property within the geographical boundaries of the customer's public safet jurisdiction. 24. Application for E911 Service must be executed in writing by each customer. If application for service is made by an agent, the Telephone Company must be provided in writing with satisfactory proof of appointment of the agent by the customer. 21. The customer Taus t furnish the Telephone Company its a greement to the P Y g following terms and conditions: A. That all E911 calls will be answered on a 24 —hour day, seven—day week basis. B. That the customer has responsibility for dispatching the appropriate emergency service vehicles within the E911 a - ervice area, or will undertake to transfer all E.911 calls received to the gover=ental agency with responsibility for dispatching such services, to the extent that such services are reasonabl available-, 3 r,- T Attachment B Page 6 of 11 C. That the customer will develop an appropriate method fct responding to calls for nonparticipating agencies whicli_. may be directed to the E911 PSAP by calling parties. D. That the customer will subscribe to local exchange service at the PSAP location for administrative purposes, for placing outgoing calls, and for receiving other calls. E. That the customer will subscribe to, or provide, telephone equipment vi th a capacity adequate to handle the number of incoming E911 lines recc=ended by the Telephone Company to be ? installed. 22. When the Selective Routing feature is provided, the customer is � responsible for identifying primary and secondary PSAP locations as X� \ cv�� well as the unique combinations of police, fire and ambulance or any l-= o other appropriate agencies responsible for providing emergency service in the E911 serving area. An Emergency Service Number (ESN)� • �: ` -'r`, Will be provided for each unique combination by the Telephone - Company. The customer will associate these ESN's with street address ranges or other mutually agreed upon routing criteria in the E911 serving area. These ESN's will be carried in the Data Management System UMS) to pe razi t routing of 911 calls to the primary and secondary PSAP's responsible for handling of calls from each telephone in the E911 serving area. The following terms define the customer s responsibility in providing this information: A. Initial and ' subsequent ESN assignzaents by street name, address range and area or other mutually agreed upon routing criteria shall be furnished by the customer to the Telephone Company prior to the effective date of service. j B. Af ter establishment of service, it is the tamer res�o�nsi lity to continue to verify the accuracy of the routing information contained in the master address file, and to advise the Telephone Company of any changes in street names , establishment of new streets, changes in address numbers used on existing streets, closing and abandonment of streets, changes in police, fire, ambulance or other appropriate agencies' jurisdiction over any address, annexations and other changes in municipal and county boundaries, incorporation of new cities or any other matter that Will affect the routing of E911 calls to x the proper PSAP. r _ C. The Telephone Company will provide to the customer on request a complete written copy of the master address file to per customer to verify accuracy of the police, fire, and ambulance PSAP routing designations. D. Changes, deletions and additions which the customer desires to have made in the master address file should be submitted on an as occurred" basis, Attachment B Page 7 of 11 £. The Telephone Company Will furnish a written copy to the customer for verification shoving each change, deletion and IM addition to the master address file. • 3 � a T 33 S.£RVI CE FEA= S 1. E911 Service is available in five service feature offerings: A. Automatic Number Identification. .� B. Selective" pouting. co Automatic Number Identification and Selective Routing. D. Automatic Number Identification and Automatic Location Identification. £. Automatic Number Identification, Automatic Location Identification and Selective Routing, 2. The following standard features are included With each of the service offerings: A. Forced Disconnect , B. Idle Tone Application C. Default Routing , D. Alternate Routing (Night Service) E. Speed Calling F. Central Office Transfer Arrange=ents 3. FSAP equipment, designed for use with Key Telephone Systems and Type ZB Automatic Call Distributor System provided under terms specified elsewhere in this tariff, includes the f of l owing: A. ANI Display and Transfer equipment consisting of a micro- processor - controlled, stored program system capable of serving up to fifteen incoming E91.1 lines and fifteen Display and Transfer Units. B. ALI equipment providing retrieval of the calling party's _ address from a data base and its display on units located at attenuant positions. A maximum of fifte display units may be installed per system, P S A �' t-;- on .01 Ori TLLUSIEIAT c pl.% on e COmPa-'Y --c-t4ve 4, . State 0 V R ,: - ,DORT1J1t'#G TELEPHO*NZ ST-F-' SERVICE . 1 S£RVIC£ �.�i1iF (Cone' d) D. b. ALI equipment P _ "_ retrieval of the Cal a da ta ba its display on =its 1=aLL_'-d at attend n= s itions. of 15 display =its MaY b--" irLinstalled alled w'> p S J ADVAO ---------- V nurrl�er r.0 . IN 0 Mi h. a ed _or c p a t: a The cal - n v t ► -ies '� ` t�v5 fiii S a f"!!:s OV=- b. billed tht- - ordi n q PS)AP are acC_ 6 t er to 0 • Office servir g ini - . on O f t .sans Rate ............ Charge 2 . a. Autoi-,,atic 'Hu-nb` 4 1 C O� 1 C:7 - rzain Stz sei-Ved 60.0r. I 5.x Clh�r L b,- develope-, -0 i V e P. 0�.l t in a pe r b. St' 4 c i U t L j , e , Offer g a s (ILI-a-P6 Ma in S ta t Ors scl-vec LE fi re- q u L %.J. C ned Aut(:P:-.&* .-ion and Selc Rout- .er 1000 e S . 1 4 EST A. "50. 00 served (1) d. Combined Auto -tic and at , 40 ,.I t per en L 0 ,_ a t. = o ,-1 100 rnain st-at4ons served ES* e. Combined AutVt*" and .&.;J';cation f. Location 1dan__.&_ SejC Routin per 1000 main Stations Served EU S- ; , 700.00 t. (1) AdditiOnal (optional) E 911 ge Line *2.- 2 5 0 Fxchan S 1,250-00 S (exclt"' rzin telcPhO.Oe do r -tnd .earast e 'i 4 %W t.- -Y%e s v,-, t f: r r.. n a t i o n hi all ortlh ovwcs tee Be! 1 lelephone Co�D,�UnY ILLUS71RATIVE G--,';F-,7iA' 10 'r 37 Z T R 1 F F of EX . il A 7 4 1 EMER -,E:NC:Y R-E-FORT.'rING TI Ems. EPHOUE E V BER SE-IRVICE (Z91 Es i RA I Z C 7 D I.R.' I 'VER S ", L RG a * 0 &_ -1 d number of the above stated ma iii iti *e!enh*nes ir. ser-rice during current 4,-welve month per at the time service -is established. Tl,.:Ls cou nt will be adjusted aulnuallY to update. cListom�.- billing, wiw t z plicab'AC twelve r; period bein the twelvt =.nths endiang with Lh� caj er)4ar y ear- Non-R.ec-urrin- X. ---.n 1 U S 0 a . Ident-.A..Licaion Fe-ature kt t .L.4 A ly L.. cu i (1) Master cont.-011er prov co=mon e t wir;-n, t-u-% e f up to four in- lines and/or four displa units, (maxim.um one per e a c h ( A - u.- c oon f ro I.I r provi,:iinp coM=)" e and wit"i"' for nex-t e1ever. incoM,in lines a.n.4/or displa uni (maxi-Um one per s each ESE si S AIZ!.) 00 Add i t i ortal lzxurjk e .re i th Aux i Aliar Controller) for up -%.0 four incomin 1ines unItz (maximum three per systez-4.), -ch t ez "o .,P S 2 .Ott (4) Dis and transfer U (Ir.aXjMU_.AA fiftee_-I per s each AE 9 U 00 (5) COM.Mer-c-iial power con- version .unit (0 tiona3) S :55 Gil ?:or thi-�estern Bell Section Te? ephone C=PCM - hy ILLUSTRAT Original Sheet 11 St ate of EXCHANGE in.RIF E: festive. F. ERGEa.CY REPGR:ING TELEPRHON S�JICE 3:HANC D UNIVERSAL EM£ GE,NCY NU;•s E 5ERVICS (Egli ) E. RATES hFiD CHARGES (font' d ) 3. PS ;P Equip -ment ( Conn' d) S-er -vice E 5 tabI i s hn, en t I on-- P. e-c no M ont*h I b. Automatic T xiation USOC C-I ara& �3 C;, �; R e Zdentif: cation Feature (1) kas ter con trol l e:- for up to three A-LI flow �, - :-� ' , displ l units ~" (max m one per System) , each j -r-;' �`' � 't a -i � - - ins �aZ1ed at s�r,.e � b - time a s e ^._u i p-- r..ert EBi S540.00 .�.a 1 , IS OG .DC SL/S . -- a!dtd to existing . R I systc:ft. EaL 2640. &Q $9 0 - 1 - -s - 00 S I (2) Auxiliary Co t-t of ler . for up to four additional. ALT ' display units , ( max i e'::.-a three per ` sys tee.) each :33: 94S . aD GS . (3) Display unit (maximmt:.•;, f:lf'tpen per sy s .o -m , each c�a i:« aI ,190 . 40 (4) Int wi. ring per display-unit C. Miscellaneous ElC1',]1 • a lr es arrd .+r<_ = t r L =, r,o3e1 .6v 'e? eprinter , specified r2s;':;?ze:-e date sets, etc. this or othe.- I G� itatL (1Z) Not a pplicable for the-w-c- rP.te elenents. - v t rn Bell pion lelepho.-je 1C-jnpjj-j-jy 06 "LLUSTIR-ATIVE GE"EF-AL Original Shutt 12 EXN".WuNGE TLRILFIF ERCE-SCY REPORTING TE 'Pu S �i jq r- E: LM zm (EC .3 V 4Z. FU%TES AND CHA,RG'rS (Cont#d) 4. SubseRren%. A. Installat-ion charges Additional PSA-P MaY be added subse Ito the initial tion of the servIce UPOn pa of the fallowin non-recurrin char which are in addit4on to aPPIiCaUble non-recurring char Onl one Subse. q Installa- c��r- will aP-Ply p, AD' r cu rate when tw cl are involved. _ r"ON't-St. pkpply the hi Item NOn-Rec-urrinq Chal"'alz a• PX1 auxiliax- y controlle e r-n C 0 C Alit dis labna unit E9U 3 S. G? 'A V d ^.".L 4 ux 31-Y C o t -r-to 14 1 c r 8 0 e. ALI displa TE a P ALI interior wiri- F.80 S1350.00 S. Xoves or Chan W a. QMO%'CS Or- C!"'.an involvir.- e-,U;p.n;en* at FSAP '0-1-ions %?411 be be -Lsed At.. AA 4- upon ebsztir.ated costs, rx. to e•ce-ed char speci i ed thi t a r i z b. ' Char g es for cust,--maAer reqtie-sts that necessita-Lte ad ,v i 4-, --ions? ry--m-Ovals. 1"=Mds 0" cha-gd�S Of access fac*1jt;e ar tr .& e - on Tel L Com-pan premises wil Lme er4uip.men uoon costs per re C. insta."Llation o-f additio. 1-e44WOW-Q-mrk or oth-r racili,,ias to mairitain a satisfaCtor- g rade 060 service such as 4esiribed in Rc is of this tariff will i>e provided b t�he Telco""* IWO tio.na'l chat-e to she � . a: . c:^ rr. one CO-Mran at no addi- ■ Z PRO. A D 161F MINNESOTA Seven County Metro Area E -911 i . Telephone central offices to be Sel ectively routed b seven digit numbers Northwestern Bell Central Offices Pref� x Number of Tel . Numbers ANOKA 421,7 16,111 BEARD 920,2 42,470 BROOKLYN CENTER 560 ,1, 6 23 B RYANT 521,2 588 30 B URNSV I LL E 890,4 12,905 CRYSTAL 533 26,666 EDEN PRAIRIE 941 9 EXCELSIOR 474 8. FT. SNELLING 725,6 8 GLEN PRAIRIE 934 5 GRANVILLE 781,8 23,852 HOPKINS 931 2 3 4,5 8 29 NORMANDALE 830 828, 893 20,546 ORCHARD 540 1 36,196 PENN 374 11 66th STREET 861 22,612 BEECH 771 32, 143 i COTTAGE GROVE 458 9 , 049 FOREST LAKE 464 257 5, HUMBOLDT 487,8 18 i LEXINGTON 452 13 MAPLEWOOV 733 28,198 MIDWAY 4 641 638 31 OAKDALE 451,5 25 PARK ROW 777 15,190 RICE STREET 482 22 SPRING LAKE 780,4 19,157 WHITE BEAR LAKE 426 13 , 541 SUBTOTAL 562,383 1 .. --'-'----�_. .. _. _ %Wh Y, e►.' xY'' �;.... i...tr .. «.._. ..;..H t- ?H.+��.y.,�Y � :i>:A _I,f :9+..+ .� r..l �':r. �'�/ Axel I., r. X b.� �+� } ;.. 3:�v ..a,j .:�._ �'ili � - - �itiorni "' ••. "a t���{k'�.�.I,�i::91ZW1!'vC#35� ]?S$�ti�:S�tl1�t'i:1iLf' a�3i�'.�Yi�l/Ci *'i i' :e "�._..Gi11.clXli ' 1`c•6�.(1!��•n4�?i'!t :.- c,.,�a:,ti...- ��,�,'�'`. ^i:..w•: -. _i. r � Non - Bell Prefix Number_ of Central O ffices Tel. Number s-- APPLE VALLEY 432 7. - - FARMINGTDN 463 3,134 LAKEV I LLE 469 2 ROS EMOUNT 423 2 SOUTH BURNSV I LLE 435 3 ,.. ,- SUBTOTAL 19,615 TOTAL 581 Al �r MINNESOTA Seven County Metro Area E 911 Telephone central offices to be Non-Selectively routed T by 3 digit prefix Northwestern Bell Prefix Number of Central Offices Tel. Numbers CEDAR 853 12,136 COON RAPIDS 755 13 DOWNTOWN (MPLS) 332,3,5,6, 330, 348, 370 338 341 371 4 76 1 ,748 FERNBROOK 553 6 FRANKLIN 870 23,846 FRIDLEY 571 12,930 HAMEL 478 932 HANOVER 498 625 NAVARRE 471 2 OAK GROVE 753 2. SHAKOPEE 445 6,096 SODERVILLE 434 4,552 SOUTH 881 24 WAYZATA 473 14,839 _ 7th AVENUE 331, 373,6 378,9 35 24th AVENUE 721 724, 9 30, 38th STREET 822 825,7 38,092 CLEVELAND 631 20 EMERSON 690 20,932 MARKET (ST. PAUL) 291 222 61 221 ST. CROI X BEACH 436 2 STILLWATER 439,0 8 " SUBTOTAL 421,268 } TOTAL 473,397 w N • t t. . Non-Bell Number of Central Offices Prefix Tel. Numbers BELLE PLAINE 873 1,535 - C H AS KA - 448 4,312:- COLOGNE 466 673 HASTINGS -, 437 71497 JORDAN 492 1 MAPLE PLAIN 479 1,740 MAYER 657 362 MOUND 472 NEW GERMANY 353 331 NEW MARKET 461 762 NEW PRAGUE 758 2,224 NORWOOD 467 1 . OSSEO 425 10,257 PRIOR LAKE 447 4,180 R OGERS 428 1,440 SCANDIA MARINE 433 1,822 ST. BONIFACIUS 446 639 VICTORIA 443 589 wACONIA 442 1,826 WATERTOWN 955 1,456 . WYOMING 462 2,345 SUBTOTAL 52,129 TOTAL 473,397 w N • t t. 7 -digit selectively routed telephone number - N.W. Bell Non --Bell Total 3 -digit prefix routed telephone numbers N.W. Bell Non-Bell Total Total telephone numbers N.W. Bell Non -Bell Total % N.W. Bell % Non -Bell 10% Growth Projection (1983) (1-1-80) i'- 562,383 =- 19,615 581,998 421,268 52,129 473,397 983 71 1,055,395 93.3 6.7 Selectively routed 581,998 + 10% = 640,198 Non - Selectively routed 473,397 + 10% = 520,737 TOTAL 121602935 0 e jo 5t. Michae Rogers Wa con i a Nor 'Mood l at Co x a f. �. de e Plai ne Le Sueur ` Way Elk i ver. e Oak Grove Anoka of ` Wyom i ng ? • Soder'vi l 1 e • 1 Fo rest Lake IZI x k Coon Rap i ds Spring Lake Wn i t p k Bea r � - Lake : � - . - • r� a Osseo _ Bkn Cente � j' l e Fe rn C rys t b rook al . B � - aI • � vi1 e ant 7"" Downtown Orchard Penn Frank in 38 24t Hopkins, St. Av.. Beard ard of 6th FT` Sne Eden to in S Prairie Nor s man Ced a.,�P South Chaska Shakopee r n5 v_i 1...�. Prior Lake 1 . � s akevi l l e Jordan 'Aft` S rt rl ew Ma rke t No rth f i el d Web s to r LN Eck l es am �• _ " 5 ERV 1 Cc AREA So. S, Webster s � Spring Lake s: R d Wing r v F R 0 P 0 L I T A N 9 1 1 T E L E P H O N E B 0 A R D RAMSEY COUL"M 911. PLAIvN 1NG COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE Friday, September 5, 1980 10:00 A. M. Roseville Police Training 1�oum T' AGE N DA �. I . Call tow.o rde r 10 : 00 A 1 . Il Minutes - Oct ober 12, 1979 iii. Update on 911 plans A. Plan approval I D. Tariff filing C. Cost Presen`tation 1. D1S.c.ussion 2. '' ecoriuuend'ation 1V, ULIier Business 11:00 A.M. V. Ad! o urnmen t 11: 30 A. r1. This meeting is very important. We will be discussing the actual costs of PSAP equipment which may be ordered in r.cA Ii5ey C0 " I'.1 ty . -1 yc:: unable to a r r nd . D lease call '. Roanne Ehrlich at 291-- 6506. M E T R O P O L I T A N 9 1 1 T E L E P H O N E B O A R D MINUTES WX RAMSEY COUNTY 911 PLANNING COMMITTEE z October 12, 1979 : 1 4EMBEAS PRESENT: John Picha, Arden Hills Phil Sanders, St. Paul Police Department Ted Fahey, St. Paul Police Department Karl Neid, Jr., Councilman Maddox's Office Herb Johnson, Capital City Fire Tom Falvey, Ramsey County Sheriff's Office Don Salverda, Ramsey County Commissioner STAFF AND OTHERS PRESENT: Pam Hallberg, Michaud, Cooley, Hallberg & Erickson Roanne Ehrlich, Local Planning Coordinator The meeting was called to order at 10:00 AM by Chairman Salverda. The minutes of September 7, 1979, were approved on a motion by Johnson, seconded by Sanders. Ehrlich presented the draft final plan. Hallberg suggested adding a verbal description of exchange areas served by each,PSAP. Johnson moved, seconded by Sanders, Hallberg's sug- gestion. Motion carried. Neid moved, seconded by Fahey, that staff contact Larry Brown's office to . request that the county Executive Director send a letter to agencies (whose services are available via 911) with a copy of the draft final plan (stamped: Final Draft) stating that the Plan will be on the agenda of the November 13 Ramsey County Board meeting for informational purposes and adoption. After discussion of need to hear from municipalities in the County Falvey moved the following amendment (which was accepted by the maker and seconder of the previous motion): A copy will also be sent to each city or township, asking for a resolution of approval to be returned to the Executive Director's office by November 10. The motion, as amended, was adopted. Neid moved, seconded by Falvey, that the meeting be adjourned and the next meeting will be subject to the call of the chair. Motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 10:55 AM. . -mom /esw