Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980 06-19 City Council PacketAGENDA Maplewood City Council 7:30 P.M., Thursday, June 19, 1980 Municipal Administrative Building Meeting 80 -15 B. ROLLCALL C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes 80 -12 (May 15) D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA E. CONSENTAGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion on these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Accounts Payable 2. Time Extension —1938 -1940 Clarence Street F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. PUD Revision - Connemara (Condor Corp.) (7:30 P.M.) 2. Bodell Spirit Shop- Revocation of Bond (7:45 P.M.) G. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Insurance H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Frank McGinley —Audit 2. Transfers to Close the 1977 and 1978 Diseased Tree Projects 3. Cable T.V. Committee I. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Plan Amendment: County Rd D (Mahl) 2. Code Amendment: Nonconforming Uses (First Reading) 3. Write -off of Uncollectible Paramedic Bills for 1979 4. T. H. 61 Frontage Road: Gervais Avenue to C.T. "C" 5. Diseased Shade Tree Program: Assessment Roll 6. Final Plans: East Shore Drive Water Improvements 7. Final Plans: Condor Storm Sewer K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS M. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:30 P.M., Thursday, May 15, 1980 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 80 -13 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7:32 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilman Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilman Present Frances L. Juker, Councilperson Present Earl L. Nelson, Councilman Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes No. 80 -9 (April 3, 1980) Councilman Anderson moved that the Minutes of Meeting No. 80 -9 (April 3, 1980) be approved as submitted. Seconded by Councilperson Juker. Ayes - all. 2. Minutes No. 80 -10 (April 17, 1980) Councilperson Juker moved that the Minutes of Meeting No. 80 -10 (April 17, 1980) be approved as submitted. Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Councilman Anderson m oved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. Petition - 4 -Way Stop - Leland and Atlantic 2. Justice Advisory Board 3. Lawsuit - Highway 35 & Roselawn 4. Clean Up Week 5. Add K -Mart Hearing Date for Revenue Note as E -11 6. Hear Item H -1 Before Public Hearings 7. Hear Item J -2 After H -1 Seconded by Councilperson Juker. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Council removed Items 7 and 8 from the Consent Agenda to become J -8 and 9. Councilman Nelson moved seconded by Juker, Ayes - all, to approve Items 1 through 9 of the Consent Agenda as recommended: - I - 5/15 1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses - Check No. 004243 through Check No. 004284 - $129,032.83; Check No. 005567 through Check No. $281,921.25; Part II - Payroll Check No. 24196 through Check No. 24325 - $54,643.91) in the amount of $465,597.99 be paid. 2. Transfer of Reforestration Grant Approved the transfer of $2,131.92 reforestration grant money from the Special Assessment Fund to the funds that originally financed the reforestration costs. 3. Settlement: Netnorlin Improvement 73 -13 Resolution No. 80 -5 -105 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 77 -9 -188 of the City Council of Maplewood, Minn- esota, adopted September 15, 1977, the special assessments for the construction of Northeast Area Utilities 73 -13 were levied against property described by County Auditor's No. 57 54600 060 01; and WHEREAS, $4,000.00 of the aforesaid assessment is to be reduced from the original amount of $5,969.11 as ordered by District Court; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the assessment for Northeast Area Street Improvement 73 -13 against the property described by County Auditor's Code No. 57 54600 060 Ol be correctly certified to the Auditor of Ramsey County by deleting therefrom the amount of $4,000.00. Resolution No. 80 -5 -106 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 77 -9 -188 of the City Council of Maplewood, Minn- esota, adopted September 15, 1977, the special assessments for the construction of Northeast Area Improvement 73 -13 were levied against property described by County Auditor's No. 57 54600 070 01; and WHEREAS, $4,000.00 of the aforesaid assessment is to be reduced from the original amount of $4,487.82 as ordered by District Court; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the assessment for Northeast Area Street Improvement 73 -13 against the property described by County Auditor's Code No. 57 54600 070 01 be correctly certified to the Auditor of Ramsey County by deleting therefrom the amount of $4,000.00. Resolution No. 80 -5 -107 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 77 -9 -188 of the City Council of Maplewood, Minn- esota, adopted September 15, 1977, the special assessments for the construction of Northeast Area Utilities Improvement 73 -13 were levied against property described by County Auditor's No. 57 54600 080 01; and WHEREAS, $4,000.00 of the aforesaid assessment is to be reduced from the original amount of $4,487.82 as ordered by District Court; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the assessment for Northeast Area Streets Improvement 73 -13 against the property described by County Auditor's Code No. 57 54600 080 Ol be correctly certified to the - 2 - 5/15 Auditor of Ramsey County by deleting therefrom the amount of $4,000.00. Resolution No. 80 -5 -108 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 77 -9 -187 of the City Council of Maplewood, Minn- esota, adopted September 15, 1977, the special assessments for the construction of Northeast Area Street Improvement 73 -13, were levied against property described as 57 54600 170 01; and WHEREAS, the above described assessment has been declared unenforceable to the property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the assessment for Northeast Area Street Improvement 73 -13 in the amount of $2,206.00 against 57 54600 170 01 be, and the same hereby are, cancelled. Resolution No. 80 -5 -109 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 77 -9 -188 of the City Council of Maplewood, Minn- esota, adopted September 15, 1977, the special assessments for the construction of Northeast Area Utilities Improvement 73 -13, were levied against property described as 57 54600 170 01; and WHEREAS, the above described assessment has been declared unenforceable to the property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the assessments for Northeast Area Utilities Improvement 73 -13 in the amount of $4,187.72 against 57 54600 170 01 be and the same hereby are cancelled. Resolution 80 -5 -110 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 77 -9 -187 of the City Council of Maplewood, Minn- esota, adopted September 15, 1977, the special assessments for the construction of Northeast Area Street No. 73 -13, were levied against property described as 57 54600 160 01; and WHEREAS, the above described assessment has been declared unenforceable to the property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the assessments for Northeast Area Street Improvement 73 -13, in the amount of $2,426.60 against 57 54600 160 01 be, and the same hereby are cancelled. Resolution 80 -5 -111 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 77 -9 -188 of the City Council of Maplewood, Minn- esota, adopted September 15, 1977, the special assessments for the construction of Northeast Area Utilities 73 -13, were levied against property described as 57 54600 140 01; and WHEREAS, the above described assessment has been declared unenforceable to the property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the assess ents for Northeast Area Utilities 73 -13 in the amount of $4,487.82 against 57 54600 1 0 01 be, and the same hereby are cancelled. - 3 - 5/15 Resolution 80 -5 -112 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 77 -9 -187 of the City Council of Maplewood, Minn- esota, adopted September 15, 1977, the special assessments for the construction of Northeast Area Street 73 -13, were levied against property described as 57 54600 180 01; and WHEREAS, the above described assessment has been declared unenforceable to the property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the assessments for Northeast Area Street Improvement 73 -13 in the amount of $3,639.90 against 57 54600 180 01 be, and the same hereby are cancelled. Resolution 80 -5 -113 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 77 -9 -188 of the City Council of Maplewood, Minn- esota, adopted September 15, 1977, the special assessments for the construction of Northeast Area Utilities Improvement 73 -13, were levied against property described as 57 54600 180 01; and WHEREAS, the above described assessment has been declared unenforceable to the property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the assessments for Northeast Area Utilities Improvement 73 -13 in the amount of $5,115.41 against 57 54600 180 01 be, and the same hereby are cancelled. 4. Planning. Commission Resignation Accept resignation of Gary Sherburne Resolution No. 80 -5 -115 WHEREAS, Gary Sherburne became a member of the Planning Commission of Maplewood, Minnesota in January of 1976 and has served faithfully in that capacity to the present time; and WHEREAS, he has freely given of his time and energy, without compensation, for the betterment of the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, he has shown sincere dedication to his duties and has consistently con- tributed his leadership and effort in many ways for the benefit of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, and the citizens of the City that Gary Sherburne is hereby extended our heartfelt gratitude and appreciation for his dedicated service and we wish him con- tinued success in the future. 5. Resolution No. 80 -5 -114 REQUESTING the Metropolitan Council HRA to apply for Rehabilitation Grant funds for the City of Maplewood. WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood desires to assist low income homeowners in making repairs to their homes for the purpose of correcting defects affecting directly the safety, habitability, energy usage, or accessibility of the property; - 4 - 5/15 WHEREAS, the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency has funds to be used for such pur- poses, and will accept applications from housing and redevelopment authorities desiring to administer these Home Improvement Grant Program funds; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has been duly organized pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1976, Section 473.123 and has all of the powers and duties of a housing and redevelopment authority pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1976, 473.193 under the provisions of the Municipal Housing and Redevelopment Act, Minnesota Statutes 1976, Sections 462.411 to 462.711; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Metropolitan Council is hereby requested to include the City of Maplewood in an application for State Home Improvement Grant Program funds, and that upon approval of such application, the City and the Metro- politan Council will enter into an agreement for operating the program within the City. 6. Time Extension - Cave's Addition Extended the preliminary plat approval for Cave's Century Addition for 90 days subject to the original conditions. 7. Swap: Gun Equipment Authorized the trade of six Police Department handguns in exchange for six new shot gun locks and brackets. 8. I.C.M.A. Conference - City Manager Approved Travel and Training application of City Manager Barry Evans to attend the I.C.M.A. Conference in New York from September 28 to October 2, 1980. 9. K -Mart - Commercial Revenue Note Resolution No. 80 -5 -116 RESOLUTION RELATING TO A PROJECT UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT: CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA (the City), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01 K -Mart Corporation, (hereinafter the Company) has advised this Council of its desire to acquire and renovate a 144,000 square foot discount store in the City. 1.02 The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474 (the Act), to issue its revenue bonds or notes to finance capital projects consisting of properties used and useful in connection with a revenue - producing enterprise. The Company has requested that the City issue its revenue bonds or notes in an amount not exceeding $4,360,000 to finance the Project. Section 2. Public Hearing - 5 - 5/15 2.01. Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b, of the Act requires that prior to sub- mission of an application to the Minnesota Commissioner of Securities requesting approval of the Project as required by Section 474.01, subdivision 7a, of the Act, this Council shall conduct a public hearing on the proposal to undertake and finance the Porject. Pursuant to that provision, a public hearing on the proposal to under- take and finance the Project is called and shall be held on June 5, 1980, at 8:15 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall. 2.02. The City Clerk shall cause notice of the public hearing to be published in the official newspaper of the City at least once not less than fifteen (15) nor more than thirty (30) days prior to the date fixed for the hearing. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. H.R.A. Appointment a. Mrs. Maria Larsen explained her reasons for wishing to serve on the H.R.A. b. Councilperson Juker moved the ;nt of Maria Larsen to the Housi Keaevelopment Autnority ror a rust rive ko) year Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all. J. NEW BUSINESS 2. Ken Berg: Sewer Fee a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mr. Ken Berg, 1617 Sextant Avenue, requested the interest and penalty charges on his sewer bill be refunded because he never received a bill. C. Staff stated Mr. Berg did not receive his bill because the previous owner had written the City a letter requesting the bill be sent to him and had never can- celled the order. d. Following lengthy discussion, Councilman Nelson moved to proceed to the next agenda item. Seconded by Councilperson Juker. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS Ayes - all. 1. Rezoning - Rice Street - L -Z Company, Inc. - 7:30 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a request from the L -Z Company for a zone change from B -C (Business Commercial to M -1, (Light Manufacturing) the property.described as Tracts B and C of Registered Land Survey No. 10. The Clerk stated the notice of hearing was in order and noted the dates of publication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Kishel moved that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning request from BC, Business Commercial to M -1, - 6 - 5/15 Light Manufacturing for that portion of the site west of a north -south line approximating the 940 contour line. Approval is on the basis that: 1. The proposed rezoning will not detract from the use or character of neighboring properties. 2. The applicant's proposal is consistent with existing land uses in the area. 3. The applicant's proposal is consistent with the intent of the zoning ordin- ance and Land Use Plan. 4. The site, due to its diversified relief, is well suited to screening a use which requires outside storage. 5. Access to a major highway facility (Rice Street) is available for truck traffic. Commissioner Prew seconded. Ayes - all." d. Mr. Dale Carmichael stated that L -Z is withdrawing their request for rezoning and as owners of the property, he is also requesting the rezoning request be denied. e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. f. Councilman Nelson moved to deny the request of LZ Company for rezoning Seconded by Councilperson Joker. Ayes - all. 2. PUD /Preliminary Plat: Crestview Forest Townhouses - 7:45 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Marvin H. Anderson Construction Company for approval of a preliminary plat and planned unit development to construct 132 townhouse units. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in order and noted the dates of publication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Fischer moved that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development subject to the finding of the Com- munity Design Review Board that the buildings are of a scale, design, and location that is compatible with single family homes in any adjacent RL area. Approval is on the basis that the project meets the first three criteria of the RLE designation. The fourth criteria dealing with the design of the units, shall be determined by the Community Design Review Board during the building and site plan review. Commissioner Ellefson seconded. Ayes all. Commissioner Pellish moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: - 7 - 5/15 1. The final plat shall not be approved until: a. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved by -laws and rules of the proposed homeowners' association to assure all common areas are main- tained. b. A signed developers agreement is submitted to the Director of Public Works. 2. Redesignate the common areas as outlots. 3. Approval of final grading and drainage plan by the City Engineer, including dedication of necessary easements. 4. Approval of a Planned Unit Development. 5. Change Crestview Forest Drive to Evar Street. 6. Provide for the dedication of a 20 foot wide easement and construction of a 10 foot wide bike /pedestrian trail from proposed Sterling Street to the west property line. Location to be determined by staff and applicant. Commissioner Whitcomb seconded. Ayes - all." d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents and opponents. The following voiced their opinions: Mr. Fred Haas, Marvin Anderson Construction Co. Mr. Brooks, 354 Mary Street Mr. Ray Lemmons e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. f. Councilman Anderson moved to approve the Planned Unit Development f Board that the buildings are of a scale, design and location that is compat with single family homes in any adjacent RL area. Approval is on the basis that the project meets the first three criteria of the RLE designation. The fourth criteria dealing with the design of the on Seconded by Councilperson Juker. Ayes - all. g. Councilman Anderson moved approval of the Forest Townhomes subject to the following coi 1. The final plat shall not be approved until: a. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved by -laws and rules of the proposed homeowners' association to assure all common areas are maintained. b. A signed developers agreement is submitted to the Director of Public Works. 2. Redesignate the common areas as outlots. - 8 - 5/15 3. Approval of final grading and drainage plan by the City Engineer, including dedication of necessary easements. 4. Approval of a Planned Unit Development. 5. Provide for the dedication of a.20 foot wide easement and construction of a 10 foot wide bike /pedestrian trail from proposed Sterling Street to the west property line. Location to be determined by staff and applicant. Seconded by Councilperson Joker. Ayes - all. 3. Alley Vacation: North of Ripley Avenue between Frank and Atlantic Streets 8:00 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request to vacate the alley in Block 2, W.H. Fishers Addition to Gladstone. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in order and noted the dates of publication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. C. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Ellefson moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the proposed alley vacation based on the following findings: 1. The alley vacation would be in the public's best interest. 2. The alley is presently being used for rear yard space by adjacent land owners. 3. The alley does not serve as a secondary access to any abutting property. It does not meet the intended purpose of the alley when it was platted. Approval is subject to a utility easement being retained for maintenance of the existing overhead power lines. Commissioner Sletten seconded. Ayes all." d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilman Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 80 -5 -117 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851, thereof, the Maplewood City Council, upon Petition of a majority of the owners of the land abutting the alley proposed to be vacated, and after a public hear- ing proceeded by two (2) weeks published and posted notice, proposes the vacation of the following described alley located in Block 2, W.H. Fishers Addition to Gladstone to wit: - 9 - 5/15 East west alley affecting Lots 1 thru 24, Block 2 W.H. Fishers Addition to Gladstone. WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council finds that the vacation of the above described alley is in the interest of the public due to changing land uses and obsolete platting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council, Ramsey County, Minn- esota, that the above described alley be and hereby is, vacated subject to a utility easement being retained for maintenance of the existing power lines, and the City Clerk is hereby directed to prepare a notice of completion of the proceedings pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851 thereof, and shall cause the same to be presented to the County Auditor for entry upon his transfer records and the same shall be thereafter filed with the Ramsey County Recorder. Seconded by Councilperson Joker. Ayes - all. G. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Diseased Shade Tree Control a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mrs.lrene Gozagowski, 2275 Carver Avenue, stated she is against the Diseased Shade Tree Program. c. Councilman Nelson requested a report on the Forestry Technician's procedures. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - Councilperson Joker; Councilmen Andar:son,.Bastian and Nelson. Nays - Mayor Greavu. d. Councilman Nelson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 80 -5 -118 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Bluemel`s, Inc. in the amount of $65,886.50 is the lowest responsible bid for for the removal of diseased trees for 1980 (Maplewood Project 80 -6), and the ......Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. 2.. Howard and Larpenteur Storm Sewer Improvement 75 -6 a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilman Nelson moved to authorize issuance of the checks for the easements needed for Improvement 75 -6. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. - 10 - 5/15 c. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 80 -5 -119 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of C & H Contracting, Inc., Elk River, Minnesota, in the amount of $44,497.50 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of Howard and Larpenteur Storm Sewer (Project 75 -6) and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Manager Evans presented the staff report. 3. Gervais Avenue, T.H. 61 to English Street - Improvement 78 -1 a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 80 -5 -120 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Shafer Contracting Company, Inc., Shafer, Minnesota, in the amount of $383,625.75 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of Gervais Avenue, T.H. 61 to English Street (Project 78 -1), and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu; Councilperson Juker, Councilmen Anderson and Nelson. Nays - Councilman Bastian. 4. .Cope Avenue Connection - Improvement 79 -1 a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilman Nelson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 80 -5 -121 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of C & H Contracting, Inc., Elk River, Minnesota, in the amount of $175,048.25 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of Cope Avenue Connection s ...(Project 79 -1), and the Mayor and Clerk are-hereby authorized and directed,to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. 5. Tractor Mower a b Ayes - all. Ayes - all. Councilman Nelson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 80 -5 -122 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of - 11 - 5/15 A & M Industrial Tractor, Inc., in the net amount of $16,467.00 is the lowest responsible bid for the purchase of a heavy duty industrial tractor with flail mowers, and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Seconded by Councilman Bastian. 6. Utility Truck Ayes - Councilperson Juker, Councilmen Bastian and Nelson. Nays - Mayor Greavu and Councilman Anderson. a.. Manager Evans presented the staff report.. b. Councilman Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 80 -5 -123 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Rosedale Chevrolet Inc., Roseville, Minnesota, in the net amount of $7,975.00 is the lowest responsible bid for the purchase of a 3/4 ton, 4 -wheel drive Utility Truck, and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Seconded by Councilman Nelson. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 2. Maple Greens Final Plat Ayes - Councilmen Anderson, Bastian and Nelson. Nays - Mayor Greavu and Councilperson Juker. a. Manager Evans presented the staff report with the following recommendation: Approval of the final plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. Developer must enter into a developer agreement with the City, to be approved by the Director of Public Works. 2. Satisfactory arrangements must be made to complete construction and pay out- standing bills on Maple Greens I and II. 3. Approval of the final plat shall not take affect until the above conditions are met. This means that the preliminary plat approval must be renewed in 90 days if these conditions are not met. b. Councilman Nelson moved to approve the Plat subject to the following conditions: )le Greens Third Additior 1. Developer must enter into a developer agreement with the City, to be approved by the Director of Public Works. 2. Developer agreed to pay all monies not in dispute on Maple Greens I and II with remainder of outstanding bills to be determined by either arbitration or court proceedings. - 12- 5/15 3. Approval of the final plat shall not take affect until the above con- ditions are met. This means that the preliminary plat approval must be renewed in 90 days if these conditions are not met. Seconded by Councilman Anderson Ayes - Mayor Greavu; Councilmen Ander- son, Bastian and Nelson. Nays - Councilperson Juker. 3. Frank McGinley - Audit a. Mr. Frank McGinley, 2044 Prosperity Road, stated before he can make a pre- sentation, he needs more information. b. Staff stated they will provide any information that they are able to. C. Council placed Mr. McGinley on the June 5, 1980 meeting. 4. Code Amendment - Accessory Building Setback a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilman Anderson moved First Reading on an ordinance amending Section 904.050 904.060 and 905.060 and adding Sections 904.100 and 905.060 regardi setbacks of accessory buildings. Seconded by Councilperson Joker. Ayes - all. 5. Travel and Training a. Councilman Anderson stated the travel and training policy should remain as stated, to be reviewed at budget time and that all costs available be supplied. b. No action taken. 6. Rental Housing Maintenance Code a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilman Anderson moved First Reading of an ordinance regarding maintenance of rental housing. Seconded by Councilperson Joker. Ayes - all. 7. Beam Avenue Sanitary Sewer, West of T.H.61 - Improvement 78 -24 a. Director of Public Works Bittner presented the staff report. b. Mr. Ralph Wagner from Probe Engineering, an engineering firm hired by Voya Pelitich, spoke. c. Mr. Voya Pelitich, developer of the abutting property on Beam spoke. d. Mr. Roger Short and Mr. Dan Boxrud, Short, Elliott and Hendrickson, Consult- ing Engineers for the City, explained the specifics of the proposed improvement. e. The following area residents expressed their opinions: - 13 - 5115 Mrs. Marilyn Vats, 1140 Beam Avenue Mr. Talmadge Carey, 1174 E. County Road D Mr. Harvey Zuercher Mr. William Essling, attorney representing Mr. Ron McDaniels, Toyota Councilman Anderson moved to waive the Rules of Procedures and to extend the meeting past the deadline. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. f. Councilman Nelson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 80 -5 -124 WHEREAS, after due notice of public hearing on the construction of water mains, storm sewers, sanitary sewers, service connections, street construction, curbs and gutters and necessary appurtenances (Project 78 -24) in the area of Beam Avenue west of T.H. 61. A hearing on said improvement in accordance with the notice duly given was duly held on February 28, 1980, and the Council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That it is advisable, expedient, and necessary that the City of Maple- wood construct that portion of the project consisting of sanitary sewer and necessary appurtenances on Beam Avenue, west of T.H. 61 from Beam Avenue and approximate 1400 feet north, as described in the notice of hearing thereon, and orders the same to be made. 2. The City Engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is authorized to contract with the Egnineering firm of Short, Elliot and Hender- son for the preparation of final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. g. Councilman Nelson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 80 -5 -125 WHEREAS, Voya Pelitich has requested a grading permit for the property identified by Ramsey County as parcel number 57 00410 230 07; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Maplewood shall issue such permit conditional on the following: 1. Developer to submit grading and drainage plan for the site. 2. Developer to final grade site to maximum slopes as indicated in such plan, cover with top soil and establish vegetation on all disturbed areas. Seconded by Councilman Anderson Ayes - all. I. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None. - 1 4- 5/15 J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Purchasing Procedures a. Tabled to meeting of June 5, 1980. 3. Public Improvement Project 78 -22 - Boxwood Avenue a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilman Nelson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 80 -5 -126 WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare preliminary plans for the improvement of Boxwood Avenue from McIZnight Road to Sterling Avenue by construction of street, watermain, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and necessary appurtenances (Public Improvement Pro- ject 78 -22); WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid preliminary plans for the improvement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the City Engineer advising this Council that the proposed improvement on Boxwood Avenue by construction of street, watermain, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and necessary appurtenances is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to M.S.A. Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $874,200.00. 3. A public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1380 Frost Avenue on Thursday the 5th day of June, 1980, at 7:30 P.M. to consider said improvement. The notice for said public hearing shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF HEARING OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, deems it necessary and expedient that the improvement hereinafter described be made; NOW, THEREFORE, notice is hereby given that the City Council will hold a public hearing on said improvement at the following time and place within the said City: Date and Time: June 5, 1980 at 7:30 P.M. Location: Council Chambers of the City Hall, 1380 Frost Avenue - 15 - 5/15 The general nature of the improvement is the construction of street, watermain, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and necessary appurtenances (Public Improvement Project 78 -22) in the following described area: generally bounded on east by Sterling Street, on the south by a line 400 feet south of Carver Avenue, on the west by McKnight Road, on the north by a line 1800 feet north of Carver Avenue. The total estimated cost of said improvement is $874,200.00. It is proposed to assess every lot, piece or parcel of land benefited by said improvement whether abutting thereon or not, based upon benefits received without regard to cash valuation. Persons desiring to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement should be present at this hearing. This Council proposes to proceed under the authority granted by Chapter 429 M.S.A. Dated this 15th day of May, 1980. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. 4. Special Exception /Plan Review: Beam Avenue and Highway 61 a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mr. Burbank, Toyota, requested permission to commence construction of the Toyota building. C. Councilman Anderson s their building subiect to d commence construction of tions with revision: "Define the upgrading of Beam Avenue required in the special exception and plan review as sanitary sewer service to the building from the east side of Highway 61 and the limited improvement of the street from Highway 61 to the west driveway entrance. All work to be approved by the City Engineer. Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all. 5. Quad Design Ordinance a. Councilperson Juker requested this matter be placed on the agenda. b. Councilperson Juker moved first reading of an ordinance regarding a Quad Design Ordinance. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. - 1 6- Ayes - Councilperson Juker and Council- man Anderson. Nays - Mayor Greavu, Councilmen Nelson and Bastian. 5/15 6. Code Amendment: Pigeon Ordinance a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilman Anderson moved first reading of an ordinance pertaining to the regulations governing pigeons. Seconded by Councilperson Juker. Ayes - all. 7. 1979 Annual Financial Report and Audit a. Manager Evans presented Council copies of the 1979 Annual Financial Report and Audit. Mr. Robert Voto, Vote, DeLaHunt, Inc., will attend the June 16, 1980 Council -Staff Meeting. 8. Gift Paramedic Program a. Councilperson Juker estate of Mrs. Helen I. Paramedic Program. that a of appreciation be forwa rous donation of $1.000. for Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all. b. Councilman Bastian moved to accept the donation from the estate of Mrs. Helen I. Johnson in the amount of $1,000.00 and that such donation be placed in the Paramedic Program Capital Outlay account No. 4600. Seconded by Councilperson Juker. Ayes - all. 9. Establish Hearing Date - Bodell's Spirit Corner Liquor Store a. Council established a hearing date for Bodell's Spirit Corner Liquor Store regarding revocation of bond as provided in Ordinance 703.080 Paragraph (2) C. The hearing is requested due to a clerk in the store pleading guilty to under- age sales. The hearing date to be June 19, 1980. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Petition - 4 Way Stop - Leland and Atlantic a. Councilman Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 80 -5 -127 WHEREAS, it is deemed advisable for traffic safety, to provide 4 -way stop signs at the intersection of Leland Road and Atlantic Street; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, that 4 -way stop signs be installed at the intersection of Leland Road and Atlantic Street. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. b. Councilman Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption - 17 - 5/15 80 -5 -128 � WHEREAS, it is deemed advisable for traffic safety, to provide 4 -way stop signs at the intersection of Junction Avenue and Atlantic Street; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, that 4 -way stop signs be installed at the intersection of Junction Avenue and Atlantic Street. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 2. Justice Advisory Board a. Councilman Anderson reported on the meetings of the Justice Advisory Board and when the next meeting will be held. 3. Clean Up Week a. Mayor Greavu requested that next year Spring Clean Up Week be reviewed for better organization. 4. Lawsuits a. Mayor Greavu commented on receiving a copy of the lawsuit filed by Voight and Fourre. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS None. M. ADJOURNMENT 1:27 A.M. City - 18 - 5/15 `a 320.00 CONTINUING LEGAL EOUCAT ,TY OF MAPLEWOOD A C C 0 U N T •P A Y A 8 L E r + CHECK* A • a yG� ),S� D 9 � -oy• K s? S � 004358 320.00 CONTINUING LEGAL EOUCAT ,TY OF MAPLEWOOD A C C 0 U N T •P A Y A 8 L E DATE 06 -19-80 PAGE 1 CHECK* A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S E 004344`' 1059.26 MINN STATE TREASURER r DEPOSITS- DEPUTY REGIST.'� - 6043 — l =.-.26 H ; Lt6REST- M LOAM £RIGA FEB-- INCOME-- FA-X- P- A'Y- AfltE— 004346 292.38 AFSCME LOCAL 2725 UNION DUES PAYABLE 004361 ` -�` 1,509.90 MINN STATE ": B- FA- IR-$HARE F E S- P -;. KAf 004347 45.13 AFSCME LOCAL 1056 ' UNION DUES PAYABLE - - T2 -- OEPIISI-TS =1l €RUT- Y -RE41 -ST -, - ANG -FA-IR- SHARE- FEES- ARAY-Afi 004348 81171.00 CITY +.CTY CREDIT UNION CREDIT UNION DEB PAYABLE 004349 61.48 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP DEFERRED COMP PAYABLE 0 -043 - — N+�i.O�— it-0SE- MARY- �4ANE-- �': A- G€- BEBUGT3- DNS - PAYABLE- 004351 191.50 MN BENEFIT ASSOC MBA INS PAYABLE 004352 5,729.40 STATE OF NN MINN INCOME . TAX. PAYABLE . - 0.0 3 — 1A�. -1 - W- ISGONSIN- OR- T-IIF- REV -ENUE M- INN- ItJGOM € -TAA- P4YABLE- 0.04354 150.00 N W AUTO BROKERS INC RENTAL, EQUIPMENT 004355 ,,. 1 MINN STATE TREASURER DEPOSITS- OE?UTY'REG %ST.'. - - 0A43 ----- 8.,.& ,A5--- HI-NN- STATE- TR €ASURE - DEP-0SI -T -% -D €RUT -Y-RE- GIST -. - -II 004357 52.00 MINN STATE TREASURER ONR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE! • a yG� ),S� D 9 � -oy• K s? S � 004358 320.00 CONTINUING LEGAL EOUCAT TRAVEL + TRAINING �b p \ // 00 43.59 _ �G-n0— AGUOF- MINN- }IR -COM L E- � TRAVZL--t-T-RATNZNGi-- I �_�F. •b 004360 15.00 RAMSEY CTY CONCILIATION A/R - PARAMEDIC i 1 004361 ` -�` 1,509.90 MINN STATE TREASURER - DEPOSITS- OEPUTY REGIST. ! 0 0+3_.2 -` -- 1, -6-5- 9.65 -- MINN- S-T-AT- E- T2 -- OEPIISI-TS =1l €RUT- Y -RE41 -ST -, 004363 4#500.00 MARSHALL LINE VEHICLES 004364 804.55" MINN STATE TREASURER OEPOSITS- DEPUTY REGIST.'' s I!1 I 004378 - 200.00 HILLCREST MIO WAGE DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE,:, :TY OF MAPLEWOOD A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 06-19-80 PAGE 2 CHECK* A M 0 U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S E 004366 39427.50 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS CO A/R - INS CONTINUANCE 145.00 ROSEMARY KANE -. AND-HEALTH INS PAYABLE - i 16,070.91 HILLCREST MIOAMERICA " NO -LIf 666 - 0043 -82== 7777, , � 1 --4 I GMA- RF-TS-REMENT - CORP -- AND- DENTAL INS PAYABLE AND- CONTRIBUTIONS,INSURA. 00436.7 1,886.32 MN STATE TREASURER -PERA CONTRIBUTIONS, PERA - 00436 -- * r � 3& 12 - -,M ". SFAT €- TREASURER -RER -- P. €�RrA.-- D €D- PA -YAB AND- CONTRIBUTIONS, PERA - 00436 -9 — 7- -5 .-76 M4- S- TAKE- Tr2 €ASURER -PER P -" D -PAPA 781 AND- CONTRIBUTIONS, PERA`i - 0043TO 71 .01 MI-NN- STAT- E-- TR- EASURER — R EPO- SI- TS - -DEP- T-Y-R €GIST,- 004371 662.25 MINN STATE TREASURER OEPOSITS-DEPUTY REGIST. 004372 4.00 JOHN LINEHAN R E F UN 0 AAU WRESTLING -G 437-3 -* �.: 3.IIO - - -MN YIKI -NG F -0O- TDAIkC � EE3, SERVI SPECIAL EVENTS ADULTS 004374 27.00 LOIS BRENNER FEES, SERVICE -- - BIiEC- IAL-EV-F,NT-S--1]7HbTLS— 004375 475.00 MINN STATE TREASURER DEPOSITS- DEPUTY REGIST.' - N437-b- - -27 M.LNN- STALE- TREA.SUR €R-- ^ NR-- LICENS-F-�FEES - -P-AY 004377 457.50 MN TEAMSTERS LOCAL 320 UNION DUES PAYABLE 004378 - 200.00 HILLCREST MIO WAGE DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE,:, 0 -0 -439 -6 -,- 04.5 -.8 S 7A7E_- OF-- MN- - - - - NINN- INGON €- T- A -X -RA- YALE= � COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE 004380 145.00 ROSEMARY KANE WAGE DEDUCTIONS. PAYABLE.' - 004381, 16,070.91 HILLCREST MIOAMERICA _ FED INCOME TAX PAYABLE - 0043 -82== 7777, , � 1 --4 I GMA- RF-TS-REMENT - CORP -- — DEF£RRE -0- -CAMP- RAYAfl4E - - P_, V 004383 89171.00 CITY + CTY CREDIT UNION CREDIT UNION DEB PAYAOL / I'' C, RI ._, ✓�X P_, V / / I'' C, RI CITY OF MAPLEWOOD A C C O U N T S P A Y A BL E DATE 06 -19 -80 PAGE 3 CHECK* A M 0 U N. T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S E 004384 45.13 AFSCME LOCAL. 1056 UNION DUES PAYABLE •. ANO -FAIR SHARF FFFS PAVAC 004385 _ 286.63 AFSCME LOCAL 2725 UNION DUES PAYABLE AND -FAIR SHARE FEES PAYAt 004386 -- 00438 - 004 140.00 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 0.00 G RANIi-E- l-TY -- PISTOL -SHOO - - 523.00 MINN STATE TREASURER TRAVEL k TRAINING T- R- AV£L-- +-- TRA£NTN DEPOSITS = DEPUTY REGIST. 004389 4b 9A- -. 800.05 r� -O #.85 MINN STATE TREASURER N €CE- SSARY -E -X PEN OI TURFS- S- INC €- DEPOSITS- DEPUTY REGIST.':_`I L- AS- T- COU- NC- I- I- M€ €�I -N I / 1 )ITY OF MAPLEWOOD A C C O U N T S P A Y A 8 L E DATE 06 -19 -80 PAGE 4 CHECK* A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S E uu5o5a 104.u1j A + M INUUSTKIAL TRACTOR SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT -4058 4 35r0Q7.4 2 Al4C RICAN NAT-I -ONAL -- BANK -- 80N0S-- PAYAOL AND -BOND INTEREST COAS -T TO- COAST - STORES- AND -OTHER CHARGES 005855 32.95 AMERICAN PLANNING.ASSOC BOOKS -40§8 —475 A QUARIUS -Hi -G ERIALS— 005857 29736.00 ASSN OF HE SUBSCRIPTIONS +MEMBERSHIP "',Li NIGIPA�IT FEES, SERVICE 005858 .19.99 RICHARD BARTHOLOMEW UNIFORMS + CLOTHING -- 0 05859 1- 48x59 - BATTERY -f�-T- IRE- -WHSE -IN SUPP- UE-S�VEH-IG 0 0586 - AND- MAINTENANCE MATERIAL -- 0858 5 +,.+ _0 €RG -- TORS € -T -Hr IN SUPaL- I €S.4E 005861 3.67 BIG WHEEL AUTO STORE SUPPLIES, VEHICLE" ' 005862 264.60 BREDEMUS HARDWARE MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 0A58 --- 1b5.0A-- SULLSEYE- INC- -- - --- �UPRL- I-E- S+-F.A4G€-.- 005864 891.00 BUSINESS FURNITURE INC EQUIPMENT, OFFICE 005865 406.60 CAPITOL ELECTRONICS INC REP. + MAINT., RADIO COAS -T TO- COAST - STORES- -MA-I-N-T6NANCt:-PtA-T€R-I-AL-S--- 005867. 142.98 COLLINS ELECTRICAL CONST BUILDING IMPROVEMENT "'-� 005868 380.00 PAT DALEY FEES, SERVICE PLBG & SEWER INSPECTIONS 0 0586 - --2s3 x660. 00--- EJ� &T -GOUN T -Y -LAN E -F- IRE- OE--- -._. —F E -ES r-Sbi2 V S.0 € - - -- �. FIRE PROTECTION 005870 5.94 ECONOMICS LABORATORY INC SUPPLIES, OFFICE 005871 15.58 JAMES G ELIAS TRAVEL + TRAINING -- 00- 5II -7 -2 � = B ARI'�Y– EVANS— TR- A11EL– +– I'RA -NF1NG 005873 ' 21398.90 FA'BRA GRAPHICS. SUPPLIES, PROGRAM , `,I 1 I . ITY OF MAPLEWOOD A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 06 PAGE 5 CHECK* A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E 005874 29,347.78 1ST NATL BANK OF ST PAUL BONDS PAYABLE AND -BOND INTEREST ND-OTHER- £HARGE 005875 :t 61.15 FLAGHOUSE INC SUPPLIES. PROGRAM 005876 119.35 FOREMAN + CLARK UNIFORMS + CLOTHING -0858 S UPPL-I-ES l _- PRO &R," 005878 45.08 GAME TIME INC SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT 005879 430.35 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS EQUIPMENT, OFFICE >' -- 00F5"0 --46rt8 -0- GLAD- STONE- F- IR-C-DEPAR -"E FEE-&, - -SERV -IC FIRE PROTECTION 005881 99.84 GLADSTONE LUMBER MART MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 005882. 71.26 GOODYEAR SERVICE STORE ` SUPPLIES, VEHICLE " - OD548-3 ----4 8.43 G OPJI €R- BE -0I- ING -C S UP-P-! IES-,--- EQt1IP -NE-N 005884 315.10 GROSS INDUSTRIAL. UNIFORMS + CLOTHING CARPET SERVICES 005885- 146.77 GRUBERS HARDWARE HANK MAINTENANCE MATERIALS ANO-SUPRLIES r-- JAN .ITORIA -L -j AND-SMALL TOOLS j X 9.7 4 i - 0 05886 - -- T HOMAS- L- HAI�EN -.- UIFIF-0fiHs•- k- GLO- IHIN ANO- TRAVEL + TRAINING - 08 584 - — 144,, H ARMON - -GL -ASS — i -A /R - INSUR -ANC - `,I 1 I . n vas aa. �� nnvya..�n rvvar.a.n anv Da rr u�af -.vu n�,n 1 ITY OF MAPLEWOOD A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 06 -19 -80 PAGE 6 CHECK* A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S E 005go5 940.40 METRO INSPECTION SERVICE FEES, SERVICE 005891 135.00 INSTITUTIONAL SALES INC EQUIPMENT, OFFICE .. -005 -89 — �;r.� &� NTERSTA�E- DETR -0i -F— -- S kFPPL- fES- ,- aFENi- GL -£ - - -� 005893 61.00 INTL BUS MACHINES CORP SUPPLIES, OFFICE ` 005894- 205.25 ISCAS MEDICAL BOOKSINC - BOOKS O0 -589 7!0.nn -.r- J OHNSON --- 00065 -ME-NS WEAR - 4) N- IF- ORMS - - + -- {;LOTH -IN - i 005896 3.00 RANDALL JOHNSON TRAVEL + TRAINING Ii 005897 19.10 JOLLY TYME FAVORS SUPPLIES, PROGRAM. -- 00589 69 76 K NOX- LUMBER- COMPANY - - MA- INTE- NA14GE- NAT£R-1- ALS--� 005899 117.00 LAKE SANITATION FEES, SERVICE - TRASH-- R€,MO- -6 005900 111.10 LEES AUTO SUPPLY SUPPLIES, 'VEHICLE'• _ - AND -SMALL TOOLS 005901 48.00 LUGER LUMBER MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 1 - AND- SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT t vas aa. �� nnvya..�n rvvar.a.n anv Da rr u�af -.vu n�,n 1 005403 - � �. M APIEWDDO- RE- V -IE --- P- U�IL- ISH2NG- 005904 68,614.11 C S MCCROSSAN. INC AWARDED CONST CONTRACTS 005go5 940.40 METRO INSPECTION SERVICE FEES, SERVICE ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS'-' -,� 00590 -. 5 N EYER-- CESSP-00L -- SERVICE- F-EES,--S-ER_/ICE---- -- - FLUSH SUMP PUMP 005907 8.16 MIDWAY FORD CO REP. + MAINT., VEHICLES 005908 182.`40 MIDWAY TRACTOR + EQUIP C SUPPLIES, VEHICLE , 005 -90 -9 = - -- 384.00 - --MN- MINING -t MFG - -CO - -- --- R£R. -t_ {ANT- .y- FOUIRMEMT -' 005910 - 15,00 MN PLANNING ASSOCIATION SUBSCRIPTIONS +MEMBERSHIP` 005911" 166.08 MINNESOTA TORO SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT 0 05 -912' OF THE STATE REGISTER /I I T� 'r Il0593. 44 N ORT-HW €ST6RN -- BELL - TEL- "CO----- -T €LE— PHONE —. 005931 709.26 NORTHWESTERN BELL TEL CO TELEPHONE 005932 97.50 CITY OF OAKDALE FEES, SERVICE BUILDING INSPECTIONS 00 937 _59.. «1 G EORGE --- W- 01SEN-- -CONST GO— AWAR- C €D— GONS- T-- GON- TRAG7�- 005934 29,660.00 PARKSIOE FIRE DEPT FEES, SERVICE 005935 2,075.00 PETERSON,BELL + CONVERSE FEES, SERVICE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY :ITY OF MAPLEWOOD A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 06 PAGE 7 CHECK* A M 0 U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E 005913 14.44 STATE OF MN REP. + MAINT., EQUIPMENT' DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION " - -0 0 5 91- 4 4 - - " ••"- - -- 3 @ .00-- - NN - ST - AT - E - TREASURER- - FEES -- SE - V - �I-OOE -- WASTEWATER OPER. CERT. 005915 105.00 MOGREN BROS LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 005916 268.00 NATURES CRADLE MAINTENANCE MATERIALS ";; >! - 0 059-14 1,167 G14 Y- O"ORTH --Sf -PAUL- U -I 005918 766.73 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO UTILITIES 005919 174.62 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO UTILITIES - 0U59 - 3 4124 NO RTHERN- -S-TA- TES -- POWER G UT- I- L- I-T-F 005921 93.96 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO UTILITIES 005922 4,546.84 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO UTILITIES 005 -9 23 - 7� -�_.'� N ORT- HERN�T- A- T- ES-- PDNER -C - U- T- EI- NI£ -S- � 0 05924 13.60 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO UTILITIES 005925 774.65 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO UTILITIES j 005 - 926 - -- tU-O —" U— W— AUTO— BR "ERS— ING - -- REN-TA4t--- EQUI- PHE—NT 005927 346,410.00 NW NATIONAL BAN( OF MPLS BONDS PAYABLE --- — A# 0- +30tJC- --N-TER€ST 005928 519.02 NORTHWESTERN BELL TEL CO TELEPHONE ' 005929 1,090.28 NORTHWESTERN BELL TEL CO TELEPHONE is Il0593. 44 N ORT-HW €ST6RN -- BELL - TEL- "CO----- -T €LE— PHONE —. 005931 709.26 NORTHWESTERN BELL TEL CO TELEPHONE 005932 97.50 CITY OF OAKDALE FEES, SERVICE BUILDING INSPECTIONS 00 937 _59.. «1 G EORGE --- W- 01SEN-- -CONST GO— AWAR- C €D— GONS- T-- GON- TRAG7�- 005934 29,660.00 PARKSIOE FIRE DEPT FEES, SERVICE 005935 2,075.00 PETERSON,BELL + CONVERSE FEES, SERVICE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY et 4 i' t ITY OF MAPLEWOOD A C C O U N T S P A Y A 9 L E DATE 06-19 -80 PAGE 8 CHECK* A H 0 U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S E 005936 230.05 CHARLES REED PRINTING CO SUPPLIES• OFFICE -0054 92.26 RE E-D-- TI- RE- &At- E$ - -I-N -- R£ -P-. -- - MAI- NTT-- VEH- IG6E_S -1 AND- SUPPLIES, VEHICLE eun -oco_ a mATUr__ cnnrou -- 1 005938 20.00 GEORGE J RICHARD UNIFORMS + CLOTHING -- 005 -939 - 4.00 R-OAD -RE- SLUE -ING- —5 PPLIE -S. VE�FICbE- 005940 95.80 RUFFRIOGE- JOHNSON EQUIP SMALL TOOLS 005941 79.40 RUGGED RENTAL RUGS FEES, SERVICE . - 0-0S - S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS SU P-RL-IE�S,-- OF -FI-;E _ AND- EQUIPMENT, OFFICE 00 5443 * .- 833 . -1 ^_ SA L €LL- ITE-- SE- R- VLCE -00— €ES- ,- S- ER- V-I-C€ - CHEMICAL TOILETS 005944 - 39737.08 T A SCHIFSKY + SONS INC MAINTENANCE MATERIALS'. 005945 10,108.33 SCHOELL + MAOSON INC — OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEES i AND -FEES, SERVICE 005946 A 471.46 SEAMAN NUCLEAR CORP — I .REP. i MAINT., EQUIPMENT -- 0 A5947' 8a 0 6 S EARS- P,OE011CK- - C -O-._- � llP1?LI- ES- ,- P- R6GRAM — =f AND- SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT -- 005 -94 _^i. -14 5 & HER MAN-NURSE RY - -- .. � A.NA- IMPRIIaAE- M €N -T - - i 005949 14.50 SPEEDOMETER RADIO SERVIC REP. + MAINT., VEHICLES; 005950 368.20 CITY OF ST PAUL FEES, SERVICE CRIME LAB 0-0 -54-54 --- &0-0-0 3M FIRE RUN 005952 37.50. ST PAUL DISPATCH PUBLISHING 005953 62.18 ST PAUL STAMP WORKS INC SUPPLIES, OFFICE DO-5 -9 �A � TD,SPR- INt.- +- Al.rII,NMENT S UP-PL.LFS,-UI:HbCI€-.- _ - j I 1 J .. u._ 005965 458.74 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER ITY OF MAPLEWOOD A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 06 -19 -80 PAGE 9 CHECK* A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S E 005955 71.00 TABULATING S£RV BUREAU FEES, SERVICE DATA PROCESSING - 06595 - " - � 9 — i STORES -INC- ---- SUflPL3- ES- ,-- OFfI -GE - -- - A ND , -- SUPPLIESy— VEMICLE•-j AND - SUPPLIES, PROGRAM D05 -7 -----54w6 - -H - -n T- OLL --G MA NTfNANC-E--MA- TER -TALS- 005958 4,651.43 TOLTZK.ING DUVALL ANDERS .FEES, CONSULTING 005959 91.00 TURNOUIST PAPER GO SUPPLIES, JANITORIAL 0059 14 -. BLISHIN 005961 84.40 TWIN CITY HARDWARE GO ...:.. SMALL TOOLS 005962 67.27 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 800 KS 0 -059 7 al VAL_S--0OIIY SHOP -.. ° E- P- .- :- Y.^T� V EHT,yG Ems— 005964 175.14 BOARD OF WATER COMM. UTILITIES 005965 458.74 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER SUPPLIES, VEHICLE AND - SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT j 005966 149.45 WARNERS INDUSTRIAL SUPP - SUPPLIES, JANITORIAL AND - SUPPLIES, OFFICE — - - -- - A ND , -- SUPPLIESy— VEMICLE•-j i i AND - SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT AND - MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 005967 52.00 WASTE MGT OF MN INC T FEES, SERVICE TRASH DUMPING -OZ5 -9 — 96-.3 W I- NDUR -L- -A NOS CAP-I-NG -IN - MAI- N- TE-NANG€ MA- TER-IAL-S 005969 81880.00 YOCUM OIL CO INC FUEL + OIL 005970 9.01 ZIEGLER INC SUPPLIES• VEHICLE 00- 5A7 — 384, -HOMAS- D- GROP-SEY - SAL,ARLES- +- 4"GE- S-,- 4EMP. == 005972. 18.00 RANOEE NELSON SALARIES .+ WAGES, TEMP.. i i ITY OF MAPLEW000 A C C O U N T S 'P A Y A 8 L E DATE 06 -19 -80 PAGE 10 CHECK* A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E 005973 146.25 ALBERT RASCHKE SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP.?.; 8,000.00 --- -- 60.81 R R-ASCHKE--- - SAL A RI- ES- +-- W- A-GES� 005975 10.00 RUTH STAVSVICK R E F U N D 005976 6.00 JOHN ALBERT AFTE Si, - r io9L --FROG RAM - R E F U N D 005978 8.00 JANET BAILEY SENIOR CITIZENS GOLF SENIOR CITIZENS GOLF R E F U N 0 005979 6.00 ERIC 8£RGMAN A �� - PROGRAM —� R E F U N D s I _8-0548 '` — �.a - = 4 0 RMES CHA6IA SENIOR CITIZENS GOLF f - FEES-TS €R-V-I CE 005981 17090.00 M F FLEISHHACKER INC FRISBEE DEMONSTRATION OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS 005982 6.00 ROBERT GREGOR FUBIIE WOI�IE BLDG R E F U N 0 - 0115-98 3 5..- - - G FNE- RATOR- SPE b�Y - CIA-GO SENIOR CITIZENS GOLF R €P .-�- -M 005984 192.50 GRAPHIC EXHIBITS RENTAL, EQUIPMENT 005985 6.00 — JOSEPH HAIDER R E F U N D -0DS- 9 .-0.0-- C4AUOdA_JOHNSON SENIOR CITIZENS GOLF 005987 * 455.20 KORNER PLAZA SUPPLIES, PROGRAM 005988 6.00 ORVIN S LARSON R E F U N D OOSA — - 55d— MIS�I-CNA — -. SENIOR CITIZENS GOLF -BOOKS 005990 005991 - 8,000.00 --- -- 60.81 MIDWEST FEDERAL SAVINGS SOG.--- NATIONAL SUPERMARKETS DEPOSITS PAYABLE _ SUPPLIES, OFFICE'? 005- 99� - -_ _ R _F_ U--4-4— 005993 6.00 FLORENCE STROM SOFTBALL R E F U N D 005994 3.05 PAULSON AUTO SUPPLY C- I�IFEN-8 GP SUPPLIES, VEHICLE 0- 1)5-9.95 — _n -nn ocr rctrn• �.._ "i r, [TY OF MAPLEWOOp A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 06 -i9-80 PAGE 11 CHECK* A M O U N T C L A I M A N T. - P U R P O S E 005997 100.00 ARNOLO TRIEMART R E F U N D ZONE CHARGE 08599 - 64r83 W; - HS- PIPE- I- Y-NE -G — O T+IER- - GON'rTRU6�3QN -fz0'r MARYLAND STERLING & FERN 005999 17.29 GREGORY KEIL - TRAVEL + TRAINING 006000 28.73 MIOWEST SIGN a SCREEN MAINTENANCE MATERIALS i4 8 8hti64. 08 GHECKS- hFRIT -EN-- 1 TOTAL OF 194 CHECKS TOTAL 980,965.05 INDICATES ITEM PAID FOR BY RECREATION FEES I \. I t I " LH . 4 1 C) DATE C6 -06 -80 (;) NET CITY CF MAPLEWOOC CHECK REGISTER - PAYRCLL CATEC C6 -C6 -80 CHECK NC. CLAIMANT O GROSS 24461 BARRY R EVANS 1,536.9 24462 VIVIAN R LEWIS 625.8 24463 LAURIE L BERGSTECT �k'' 520.7 24464 CANIEL F FAUST 1.222.8 24465 ARLINE J HAGEN 751.3 24466 ALANA K NATHEYS 522.0 24467 ANNE N RICHARDS 56.5 24468 LUCILLE E AUPELIUS 1,142.0 24469 PHYLLIS C GREEN 584.3 24470 PETTY C SELVCG 584.3 24471 LCRRAINE S VIETCR 440.3 24472 JEANNE L SCHACT 425.6 24473 ALFREC J PELCCLIN 601.8 24474 JAPES G KLEIN 104.1 24475 TERRANCE C RILEY 104.1 24476 CAVIO L ARNCLC 966.4 24477 JCHN H ATCFISCN 848.3 24478 ANTHCNY C CANAPES 1,139.3 24479 CALE K CLAUSCN 848.3 24480 KENNETH V CCLLINS 970.1 24481 CENNIS J CELNCNT 1,126.2 24482 RICHARC C CREGER 967.8 24483 RAYNCNC E FERNCW 848.3 24484 NCRNAN L GREEN 986.7 24485 THCNAS L HAGEN 1,204.3 24486 KEVIN R HALWEG 848.3 24487 MICHAEL J HEPPERT 888.5 24488 CCNALO V KCRTLS 291.5 24489 RICHARC J LANG 887.5 2449C JCHN J NC NULTY 1,082.4 24491 JAMES E NEEHAN JR 858.1 24492 CANIEL 8 NETTLER 807.6 24493 RICHARC N NCESCHTER 848.3 24494 RAYNCNC J MCRELLI 832.1 24495 RCBERT C. NELSON 1,038.4 24496 WILLIAM F PELTIER 949.8 24497 RICHARC W SCFALLER 1,303.8 2449E CCNALO W SKALPAN 84.8.3 24499 GREGCRY L STAFNE 848.3 245CC VERNCK T STILL 807.6 24501 CARRELL T STCCKTCN 807.6 24502 ERLCE W WEBER 898.9 24503 CUANE J WILLIANS 880.6 245C4 JCSEPH A ZAPPA 988.1 24505 CEP.CRAF A PASTVR 413.0 24506 JAYNE L FLAUGFER 556.1 24507 CECRGE W NU.LWEE 496.1 24508 KAREN A NELSCN 551.0 24509 JCY E CNATH 459.3 24510 JULIE K SCOTT 464.7 24511 JCANNE N SVENCSEN 581.6 24512 MICHELE A TUCHNER 501.4 24513 KATHERINE N WALL 119.3 24514 RCNALO C CECKEP 1,149.9 24515 CENNIS S CUSICK 1,126.2 24516 CAVIC N GRAF 1.030.6 24517 RCGER W LEE 1,255.0 24518 JCN A NELANCER 1,097.4 24519 CARCL N NELSCN I,C00.4' 24520 CALE E RAZSKAZCFF 887.5 24521 MICHAEL P RYAN 1,098.11 24522 RCBERT E VCRWEPK 1,261.7 24523 JAMES YCUN.GREN 846.9 24524 JAPES N ENBE.PTSCN '740.7 24525 ALFREC C SCH!ACT -953.5 24526 CLIFFCRC JMCTTAZ 64.6 24527 NARCELLA N NCITAZ '584.3 24528 WILLTAN L8IYTTNER 1,264.2 24529 JAMES G ELIAS 790.6 24530 CENNIS L PECK 790.6 24531 FALL 8 WE88ER 826.1' 24532 JUDITH A WEGWF.RTH 191.61 DATE C6 -06 -80 (;) NET `1 \ 1 419.C8 347.71 795.52 348.47 O 424.78 55.22 635.27 413.00 (� 384.20 281.63 332.03 68.92 94.40 102.29 314.72 497.23 638.86 51.96 167.20 161.10 O `52.80 303.16 515.46 174..43 449.54 502.92 206.41 497.65 (7 598.03 472.56 `18.94 522.16 C7 `.52.73 665.44 523.57 606.33 - 407.79 512.80 468.89 531.25 f) 551.22 446.65 640.83 255.90 O 368.60 3 14.76 343.27 317.61 C) '11.72 382.74 270.84 119.35 369.38 723.92 474.66 157.09 ) 150.91 `91.17 133.31 495.27 �) 338.88 502.68 490.39 `_86.10 58.14 393.31 831.97 446.73 452.98 545.42 158.31 l `1 \ 1 O ® CHECK REGISTER CITY CF MAPLEWOOC - PAYRCLL GATED C6 -06 -80 DATE C6 -06 -80 O CHECK NC. CLAIMANT GROSS NET - ® 24533 IGCR V FEJCA 711.47 477.00 C) 24534 PETER R GANZEL 360.00 287.21 24535 GREGCRY C KEIL 97.20 88.69 ® 24536 24537 WALTER M GEISSLER T 820.26 - 513.2.5 JAMES GESSELE 686.96 459.09 O 24538 KENNETH G FAICER 958.62 166.40 ' 24539 RCBERT F WILLIAMSON 617.54 401.42 2454C WILLIANC CASS 978.46 503.43 ® 24541 RCNALO L FREBERG 640.00 414.00 24542 RCNALD J HELEY 696.80 446.45 24543 PICF'AF.L R KAN.E 698 - -.83 - = 305.68 24544 GERALD W MEY -ER 700.86 350.95 24545 ARNCLU H PFARR 733.92 - 478.11 O 24546 JCSEPH P. PRETTNEP 9y4.50 647.80 24547 ECWARD A RE.INERT 722.93 461.36 ® 24548 24549 GECRGE J RI.CHAP.C: FARRY 696.,80. 428.72 J TEVLIN< JR 729.62 519.43 O 24550 JEFFREY P.GRIENANN 103.95 102.14 24551 GILBERT C LARCCFE 504.92 239.93 ® 24552 24553 N PAULINE ADAMS RUCCLPF R 679.85 433.71 EARANKC 893.54 563.44. 24554 LCIS J ERENNER 545.54 188.92 24555 BARBARA A KRLNNEL 291.50 174.20 2455E 2A5H7 RCBERT C CCEGARO RCY G WARC 1.153.85 127.63 _ 277.65 217.23 O 24..8 KYLES R BURKE 696.80 406.88 24559 CAVIC A CERNAIN 696.80 442.40 ® 24560 245611 KELVIN J GUSINCA RCCAND 971.75 555.77 " B HELEY 701.44 46C.79 C) - 24`,62 FENNY F KLAUSING 696.80 396.76 24563 REED E SANTA 700.80 460.90 ® 245(4 24565 RCBERT T FI'SCHER JERRY F 64.00 :00 64.00 J JR 192 172.01 O 24566 JCSEPH P PLANIE 43.20 43.20 245(.7 NARK A RECSFAW 174.00 158.22. 24568 24569 CAVIO J WALDEN BARBARA J PRLNELL 182.02 143.97 l `-) 24570 JANET N GREW 493.24 - 338.98 24571 JUDITH HCRSNELL 130.50 121.12 - 24572 24573 JAPES R NCKFE CHRISTINE 45.43 4C.83 SCUT7ER 519.20 347.82 O j 245)4 JUDY M CFLEBECK 601.21 280.55 24575 THCNAS G EKSTRANC 660.34 423..10 24576 24577 RANCALL L JCFNSCN 672.28 425.39 }i ( -NANCY J NISKELL 191.60 144.86 24578 - GE(FFREY W CLSCN 1,133.69 628.94 24579 NARJCRIE CST - RCN 919.85 590.55 24580 24581 RCBERT J WENCEP RICHARD 696.62 467.43 - I J BARTFGLCMEW 816.96 452.89 i) 24582 CAVIC B ECSCP 676.38 42C.26 24583 EDWARD A NACEAU 777.00 522.99 ® 24584 24585 LAVERNE S DUTESCN GERALD 1,023.50 401.70 C CWEN 710.40 4'T 2.33 it 24586 WILLIAM S TT-CNE _ 76,7.6.8`. 507.37 24587 THCNAS J VCV'E5 288x00: 235.45 ® 245138 24 589 JCHN E NACCCNALO CEN_NIS N MULVANE.Y, 768.80 °08.00 463.97 i 743..20. O I. CHECK NLNBER 24461TFRL 24.589 90,978..47 50,832.28 soa PAYRCLL CATER C6 -06 -80 - {� 24459 CYNTHIA J MORGAN��_. "- `62.77 23.01 -) 24450 LEOTA D OSWALD 2,641.00 1,766.04 (� ** *TOTALS * ** 93,682.24 52,621.33 J, MEMORANDUM T0: City Manager FROM Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Home Occupation Permit - Time Extension LOCATION: 1938 Clarence Street APPLICANT/ OWNER: Linda Hall Roberto PROJECT: Dance Studio DATE: June 12, 1980 Request Approval to renew the home occupation permit for a dance studio Past A ction 1. Refer to the attached staff report dated May 16, 1979. 'r "z 2. 6- •7 -79: The City Council approved the special exception for the dance studio with the following conditions: a. The provision of a drive for four off street parking spaces on the site b. The provision of two legal exits out of the basement c. Compliance with the State Building Code. Somce of those requirements include: 1. Two exits from the basement 2. Walls, ceiling and doors constructed of one hour fire resistant material 3. Proper exit lighting d. Inspection and approval by the Fire Marshal e. The special exception shall be issued for a one year period. After one year, Council may review the use for possible problems. If none exist the permit may be renewed. 3. The Building and Fire Safety Code requirements have'not yet been met. N Analysis The applicant has stated that she has not begun operating the dance studio yet,but she still plans on doing so. Staff sees no reason to deny the renewal, provided the home occupation permit is again issued for a one year period. The one year. review period is to permit Staff to determine if any problems have resulted from the business. If none exist after one year of operation, the home occupation permit should be renewed for a five year term. Recommendation Approval of the home occupation for a dance studio subject to compliance with the Uniform Building Code and Fire Safety Code. The home occupation shall be reviewed after one year. If no problems have developed, the permit may be renewed. Action by Council: Enclosed: Endorsed Modifie _ 1 I. Staff report: 5 -16 -79 Rejected—. Date 0 MEMORANDUM / TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Special Exception APPLICANT: Linda Roberto potion by Counell. OWNER: Lester Cromey, LOCATION: 1938 -40 Clarence Street �eedors�t l PROJECT: Dance Studio DATE: May 16, 1979��� Request The Applicant is requesting approval of a special exception in order to operate a dance studio in the basement of her home. Existing Land Use Two - family home on a 16,000 square foot parcel, consisting of several small platted lots. Proposal See attached letter. Surrounding Land Use North: Single family homes, zoned LBC, Limited Business Commercial. South: City Parking lot, Frost Avenue, and City Hall; zoned BC, Business Commercial East: Gladstone House parking lot. ; West: Maplewood Foods Planning Consider 1. The Land Use Plan designates the site and surrounding area for LSC, Limited Service Center. 2. The site is zoned R -1, Single Family Residence. 3. Section 904.010, paragraph 5, permits "Art studio, photograph studio or other artistic pursuits conducted in the residence or accessory building, but only upon the securing of a permit to be issued by the City Council." 4. The hours of operation will be from 5:00 to 9:00 P.M. on Monday, 10:00 P.M to 2:00 P.M. on Tuesday, 10:30 A.M. to 7 :30 P.M. on Wednesday, and 10 :30 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. on Thursday. 5. The applicant expects from four to eight students per class. 6. The students will be mostly young girls whose mother's will drive them to the studio and drop them off. The applicant estimates that up to four mothers will stay with their daughters until the class is over. 7. The applicant will need to provide a total of 8 off - street parking spaces, four for the residents and four for the studio customers. 8. The applicant plans to construct a drive on the site, but it is likely that the drive will not accommodate eight vehicles. 9. The applicant would like to use from two to eight of the spaces in the adjacent City parking lot. 10. The City parking lot is usually full when court is in session. 11. The owner of the Gladstone House has told the applicant she may use their parking lot anytime. Analysis Parking is the main problem with this case. The applicant should make an effort to provide adequate off - street parking facilities on the site. Should this prove impractical, however, Staff would have no objection to the applicant using the City lot after 5:00 P.M. or the Gladstone House lot, with written permission from the owner. Recommendation Approval of the special exception for a home dance studio, subject to: 1. The provision of a drive for.off- street parking on the site. 2. No parking on the City's lot between the hours of 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. 3. The use of the Gladstone House parking lot, with written permission from the owner. 4. The provision of two legal exits out of the basement. 5. Compliance with the State Building Code. Some of those requirements include: a. Two exits from the basement b. Walls, ceiling, and doors constructed of one hour resistant material. c. Proper exit lighting. 6. Inspection and approval by the Fire Marshal. H 2 3% No street parking. 8. The special exception shall be issued for a one year period. After one year, Council may review the use for possible problems. If none exist, the permit .may be renewed. I concur with the above � aa R. Evans Enclosures 1. Location map 2. Property.line map 3. Applicant's letter rn 3 Y LINDA /PAUL ROBERTO PETITIONER SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUEST LOCATION MAP " 5 -16 -79 DATE SCALE PG. ST. PAUI- 4 7 7 10 u - _ : -. 17 RYAN Z LL o Z < L l F r e IS -- 7 V) ?s NO. G z 0 z LINDA/PAUL ROBERTO -PETITIONER SPECIAL EXCEPTION - REQUEST PROPERTY LINE MAP 5-16-79 DATE SCALE ` \ , � � ' - -._- -' VA � »' .. � � _ .�. _ _ :, - - -_ -� -- _.__— �Li`�z!_rJ �wr �L- �cP1_.__`�ZLryPzr_ze� -- - - - --- -- - - - - -- -------- - - - -� - - - - -- ., --- -- ------------- - ----� 1- - -- - -, . r '�-� - -- -7 Dy �� -- - T- -._ - - - - -- , - ._ _ _ _ � -- _ -- -- � : . -- - - - - -- I� - - -, i -- � c�, -- .ohG�c - _ � �------------ - - - - -- - - -- O'CONNOR & HANNAN PATRICK J. O'CONNOR FREDERICK W. THOMAS JOE A.WALTERS THOMAS A. HILLER IR MICHAEL E. MCOVIRE RICHARD L. POST K 9"NETH B.JO NES,JR. ROBERT J. CHRISTIANSON. JR. CHARLES B. FAEGRE FRANK J. WAIF IA. ES R. DORSEY ANDREW J.SHEA SCUOLA. M.MCMILLAN CHARLES O.REITE WILLIAM R. MCORANN WALTER C. PARKINS KEHT ERIC HEY JAMES OTIS REYER JOHN J. SOMMERVILLE JAMES A.RUBENSTEIN NANCY F. FOWLER JER EM IAH J. KEARNEY THOMAS R.5HERAN JOHN A. BV PTO N ROBERT A.BRVNI0 FREDERICK W. NO RRIB WILLIAM E. FLYNN RANDOLPH J. MAYER WILLIAM C. KE4LY(1918-1970) LOCAL COUNSEL— F.JAVIER FABREGAT. ATTORNEYS AT LAW THIRTY - EIGHTH FLOOR, 105 TOWER BO SOUTH EIGHTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 (612) 341-3600 TELEX 29 -0564 TELECOPIER 612 341 - 3600(256) PASEO DE LA CASTELLANA, 8 MADRID I, SPAIN 276 -5524 TELEX 23802 FALW E.+ DAVID BURLINGAMEA MARTIN M. BERLINER' GREGORY A.KEARNS. SUITE 1100 SECURITY LIFE BUILDING 1616 GLENARM PLACE OENVE'R,COLORADO 60202 (303)573 -7737 May 30, 1980 Mayor and City Council City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Re: Condor Corporation Planned Unit Development Ladies and Gentlemen: t=' -•1 SUITE 000 1919 PENNSYLVANIA AVE.N.W WASH IN OTON, O.C. 20006 (2 02) 760-0700 PATRICK J.O'CONNOR WILLIAM T. HANNAN' EDWARD W. BROOKE. JOHN J. FLYNN H. RO BERT HALF 'ER. JOB SON E. DILLON THOMAS H.QU11'N. HOWARD G. FELDMAN. DAVID R,MELINCOFF DELANCEY W. DAVIS+ RICHARD G. MOR'JAN PHILIP R. HO C HB ERG THOMAS V. VAKERICSI DO US LAS M. CARNIVAL. TERENCE P. BOYLE. HOPE S. FOSTER. BRIAN P. PHELAN. THOMAS R. JOLLY. BARRY J. CUTLER. MICHAEL J. CONLON. DONALD S. AS SOUR. PETER C. KISSEL' CAROL N. PARK JOSEPH E. PATTISON• CHARLES W. GARRISON' CORDON K. GAYER. ROBERT J. STEELE. CHRISTINA W. iLEPS. MICHAEL E.VEVE. MARTHA PRIDDY pgTTER50N. JAMES H.HOLT. SICOVNSEI JOSEPH F. CABTIELLO. F RED O. THOM P SON. JOHN. H. HOLLOMAN T6. .NDT MEH.ER DF HINN E9DTA DAR We represent Condor Corporation, the developer of the Connemara Condominium Project in Maplewood. By letter dated November 30, 1979 we requested you to defer action indefinitely on an application by Condor to modify the existing planned unit development permit, seeking approval of a fourth 96 unit building on the site. At this time, we would like to reschedule the matter for public hearing and consideration by the Council at its June 19, 1980 meeting. Thank you for your consideration. Yours very " v�ery truly, � .�4_ elU) ry l \ W Frank J. W l � FJW:emw cc: Mr, John F. Bannigan, Jr. " Mr. James R. Riley Mr. John J. 5muda MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: S UBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANVOWNER: PROJECT: DATE: Request City Manager Director of Community Development PUD Revision Lower Afton Road Condor Corporation Connemara 3 and 4 October 11, 1979 r l r' ! Act:i.oa i)y Counollz Ledifi:;P Revisions to conditions 1 and 14 of the original Planned Unit Development permit, to allow the construction of a fourth building. Site Description 1. Location: Refer to enclosed maps 2. Site Area: 26.01 acres. The property consists of 5 parcels. 3. Existing Land Use: Two 96 unit condominium buildings. Proposal The applicant would like to construct two additional buildings on the north side of the property. Each building would have 96 units and would be similar in appearance to the existing buildings. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Lower Afton Road. North of Lower Afton Road is Ramsey County Park land. Easterly: An undeveloped site planned for a City fire station. Southerly: Londin Lane. South of Londin Lane is a 38 acre parcel owned by Mary Anderson Construction. They plan to construct single and double dwelling units. The Land Use Plan designates their property for RL and RM densities. Westerly: A 25 acre undeveloped parcel, planned for RM density use. Past Actions 11- 14 -72: Council held a public hearing on a PUD permit and passed a motion stating that, "The Council is in the position of being favorably disposed towards this development in terms of three buildings, providing that before issuance of the permit those matters in the staff report be resolved and that further sub- stantiation of the developers suggested density be provided and that this project then be tabled until such time as sufficient resolution is apparent and the staff can bring it back to Council." I 12- 21 -72: The Council approved the special use permit for three buildings, with 15 conditions (see enclosed minutes of 12 -21 -72 and the signed agreement). 2- 15 -73: Council moved to authorize staff to work with the Condor Corporation to approve architectural design for the first building at the southeast corner of the property subject to staff approval of grading, plans, landscaping plans, prior to issuance of a building permit; park charges to remain a condition of the Special Use Permit, to be charged consistent with whatever Park Policy is in effect at the time occupancy is given. 7- 13 -73: A lot split was recorded with the County creating a 638.32 foot by 458 foot parcel in the southeast corner of the subject property. 5 -1 -74: An illegal lot split was recorded with Ramsey County. The split was within the previous split recorded on 7- 18 -73. 5- 11 -78: Council approved the plans for Connemara II, subject to 12 conditions. These conditions will be considered in the review of the drainage plan for the third building. 10 -9 -79: The Community Design Review Board approved the site plan for Connemara III and IV, subject to Council approval of the PUD revisions. Planning Considerations 1. The Land Use Plan designates the property for RM, Medium Density Residential The RM density allows a maximum density of 22 people /net acre. 2. There are 18 one bedroom units and 78 two bedroom units in each building. Assuming this same mix in buildings three and four and allowing a bonus for underground garages, the proposed density of all four buildings would be 30.7 people pe!r net acre. The density for three buildings would be 23.6 people /net acre (see enclosed density calculations). 3. The fourth building would substantially exceed the density allowed by the Land Use Plan. The third building would conform if units were dropped or the number of one bedroom units increased. As an example, the third building would meet the Land Use Plan densities if the units.were reduced from 96 to 73 (assuming 10 one bedroom units and 63 two bedroom units). 4. The Land Use Plan is the basis for determining all multiple unit densities in the Zoning Ordinance. 5. The property is zoned F, Farm Residence, with a PUD for 3 condominium buildings approved in 1972. 6. Condition 14 of the 1972 PUD permit states that: "approval is c not to exceed and occupancy demonstrable, m ditioned upon usage of buildings as condominiums, density of 25.88 people per acre, if after development of three buildings a projected density of 22 people is reconsideration may be called for a fourth building." 2 7. The applicant is requesting that this condition be amended to allow con- sideration for a fourth building based on the actual densities of the first two buildings. His justification is stated in the enclosed letter. 8. Condition 1 of the 1972 PUD states that: "The site plan concept is approved with the exception that Building A is not approved at this time nor the related off - street parking of 198 spaces or Building A." 9. The applicant is requesting that this condition be revised to allow con- struction of this fourth building. 1 Considerations The City Attorney is of the opinion that if there is a conflict in determining maximum allowed densities, the City Council may amend the 1972 PUD to conform to the standards of the current Land Use Plan (see enclosed letter from John Bannigan). Analysis The primary issue in this case is whether the maximum allowed density on the site will be based on the City Land Use Plan or the 1972 PUD permit. Staff is recommending the applicant's request for a fourth building be denied. The main reason is to preserve the basic intent of the City's Land Use Plan. The Land Use Plan is the City's principal guideline in making decisions on 'land use and density. It is the basis for all other planning, including sewers, water, drainage, parks, street system, and population projections. The City should make every effort to base all land use decisions on this Plan. The applicant makes the following points: 1. The existing condominiums have fewer people /unit than projected in the Land Use Plan. 2. Council must abide by the 1972 PUD and allow a fourth building. 3. The third and fourth buildings can be combined into one building, if Council denies the fourth building. The first point is that the existing condominiums have fewer people /unit than projected in the Land Use Plan. This statement is probably true. The people per unit in all residential building types has declined, since the Plan was adopted. As an example, the Plan uses a density of 4.1 people /unit for single - family homes. The actual density is 3.2 to 3.3 people per unit. This change is because of declining birthrates, increased divorces, and more single households. 3 Staff discussed the possibility of reducing the people /unit figures with the Planning Commission over several meetings in 'late 1978. After much discussion, it was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the people /unit figures should not be reduced. They should be considered as maximum densities, rather than reflecting actual densities at any one time. Their reason was that densities may again increase to 1970 standards, with changing birthrates and living • patterns. Allowing an increased number of units, based on today's densities, would create excess densities in the future, if birthrates increase to 1970 levels. Using the Planning Commission's position, the applicant's argument that actual density in his existing buildings is less than projected by the Plan, is not a valid justification for amending the PUD. The second point is that Council must abide by the 1972 PUD and allow a fourth building. The 1972 PUD states "reconsideration may be called for." It does not state that Council must allow a fourth building. On the contrary, condition one clearly states that: "The site plan concept is approved with the exception that Building A is not approved at this time nor the related off - street parking of 198 spaces or Building A." (Building A was the fourth building proposed proposed in 1972.) The City Attorney is of the opinion that if there is a conflict in the method of determining density between the Land Use Plan and thel972 PUD permit, Council may amend the PUD to bring it into consistency with the Land Use Plan. His enclosed letter of 9/27/79 states that: "Should densities set forth in the approved P.U.U. be in excess of, or the. method of determination conflict with the comprehensive Land Use Plan, the City may properly reconsider and if deemed necessity for the public: welfare, amend said P.U.D. to conform thereto. So long as no vested rights have accrued in the proposed third and fourth buildings proposed, the City may initiate a review for amendment consistent herewith." The Attorney feels that vested interest cannot be claimed until at least a building permit is issued. In order to correct the PUD and make it consistent with the Land Use Plan, condition 14 should be amended to delete the references to density for a fourth building. The third part is that if the City does not allow the fourth building, . he could construct the third and fourth building as one structure. Staff disagrees. Condition one states that a specific site plan concept was approved. This concept approval was for three buildings of equal size and density. Com- bining buildings three and four would require an amendment to the special use permit. 4 I In summary, the.Land Use Plan sets density standards based on maximum densities. The 1972 PUD bases density on existing densities. If we are to do a good job of planning for parks, utilities, and transportation, the City should base their planning on maximum densities. The proposed third building would slightly exceed the density allowed by the Land Use Plan. A fourth building would substantially exceed the allowed density. Since Council previously approved a third building, there is some basis for accepting it. If the integrity of the Plan is to be preserved, however, the fourth building should be denied and the PUD permit revised accordingly. Recommendation I. Denial of the proposed amendments, on the basis that: 1. The City's Land Use Plan was adopted in September, 1973, after a considerable amount of discussion, public hearings, and citizen input. It has since been the basis for all of the City's Planning for sewer, water, storm water control, parks, streets, and population projections. 2. The Land Use Plan is based on maximum, rather than actual densities. While the present densities in the first two buildings may be lower than those projected in the Land Use Plan, densities may increase with changing birth rates and living patterns. 3. The fourth building would substantially exceed the number of units allowed by the City's Land Use Plan. 4. Since the 1973 Land Use Plan was adopted after the 1972 PUD permit, the City Council may reconsider the permit, based on conflicts with the City Plan. 5. Since no building permits have been issued or foundations constructed, there is no significant vested interest in a fourth building. 6. The Land Use Plan is the basis for determining maximum densities in all multiple zoning districts in the City. 7. For the above reasons, denial of a fourth building is in the best interests of the public welfare. II. Staff recommends that Council revise condition 14 of the PUD permit as follows, based on the findings in the first recommendation: 14. Approval is conditioned upon usage of buildings as condominiums. Refer- ances to density for a fourth building in condition 14 of the 1972 PUD are deleted. Enclosures: 1. Location Map 5. Developers Agreement Form. 2. Property Line Map 6. Applicant's letter of Justification 3. Site Plan 7. Letter from City Attorney (9- 27 -79) 4. Council Minutes 12 -21 -72 8. Density Calculations o, 9. Memo on compliance with previous conditions 10. Planning Commission minutes - ,11 "5 -79 5 l n F u _ _CONDOR CORPORATION � 1. LOCATION MAP 1 , 1 PARK 1 1 ` 1 I (7. 08 rl 7' � � .• I S8_e 01__20 °E 1.89... 209.43 - -� •.- ....,,��: � �' 100 .tOV• 1 9 0 R Yr. L U Q. - II.SSat > \f I M ° ESM .r DOG3$ �Bb09 22 S 'o ° i \ t to I 1 26 h LS9« rA58) [ * 369:55) m e °40'w Pro 5 68._40• — _ 330➢)— �1 N76. /2 pWNERSHIP APARTMENT OWNERS' TMENNO. 50 . NO.I G CONN = I ONNEMARA II J EMARA 1 � I 2. PROPERTY LINE MAI !�r '_qua. ✓�'.._. • . v, •. '.- .. ".�•:.' .� .; i.. - -..._ �-- . CONNEMAIM 71L & ?p -b - Condor Corporation 1 �k 'q PneKluq: J 9s R <° 1 Polio '��`�� � - � t .CONDOR CORPORATION PETITIONER A. • pIdDo MINUTES OF MAPLENTOOD VILLAGE COUNCIL 7:30 P.M., Thursday, December 21, 1972 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 72 -47 A C ALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Village Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7:34 P.M. by Mayor Axdahl, B. ROLL CALL Lester C. Axdahl, Mayor Present John C. Greavu, Councilman Present Harald L. Haugan, Councilman Present Donald E. Olmstead, Councilman Present Donald J. Wiegert, Councilman Present H, U110INIS1 BUSINESS 1. Planned Unit Development - Condor Corporation (Londi.n Lane) a. Manager Miller stated approval of t:he Condor Planned Unit development had been recommended by staff with the following conditions: 1} The site plan concept is apprcved with the exception that Building A is not approved at this time nor the - related off- street parking of 193 spaces or Building A; 21 The site shall be served by public water and sanitary sewer prior to occupancy of the development; 3) If the developers connect directly into the Metropolitan Sewer Board interceptor sewer on Lower. Afton Road written permission from the Sewer Board shall be submitted to the Village; 4) The site shall contain all internal storm drainage waters so as to not discharge those waters from the site at any volume or rate greater than is the current discharge ':ate and volye now occurring in its vacant laud use state. The special use permit holder shall have prepared an engineer- ing drainage study of the site, indicating the methods to be used to ac- complish this condition and the Vi1la;e Engineer. shall review and make a determination that the report proposals will accomplish this objective and condition. The special use permit holder shall provide for siltation con- trol into the pond on the site; 5) Prior to any occupancy of any units in Buildings C or D, Londin Lane shall - 3 - 12/21 be improved as a Village public street in accordance with Village standards; 6) The permitted development shall provide a housing opportunity for low and moderate income persons, providing no less than ten percent or no more than twenty percent of all its approved dwelling units for low- moderate income families as defined by federn guidelines by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Such units shall be distributed as close to equally throughout each approved residential building; 7) The special permit holder shall agree to enter into negotiated easements for public utility routes and areas that would need to cross through the site serving other adjacent areas; 8) 'Pne special permit use folder shall prepare a revised off - street parking arrangement and make design accomodati.ons for bus stop facilities to pro- vide such service to the site. Further, a bus stop facility shall be pro- vided and operationally available at the time of occupancy; 9) The special use permit holder shall have a neighborhood public park obligation based upon the ten acres per 1000 population objective out- lined in the Planning Commission adopted plan. The populations assigned per dwelling unit to determine acre demands shall be those advanced in the plan. The application of space demands shall be converted to a mone- tary renumeration to the Village r.adier than land, since no public park is planned on the subject property. The application of a park charge shall be determined at the time of building permit request and shall be collected at the time when 75% of all units within any one building is approved; 10) The approximately one acre tract located in the southeast corner of the proposed development: currently owned by Richard Keller shall be merged under one common owner:ahi.p control with the special permit site. The special use permit holders shall be required to accomplish this condition and legally demonstrate, ownership prior to the Village allowing any build- ing permits of any type to the special permit property. Further, the special use permit holders shall develop an expanded site plan which in- corporates the Keller property into the total site plan. Such site plan shall be reviewed and approved by the'Village Council prior to any.build- ing permit activity for fire special use permit site; 11) All eristing buildings on the special use permit site shall be removed prior to the first occupancy call of any building unit on the site; 12-)'A landscaping and final grading plan shall be provided to the Village at the time of building plan review by Village for architectural comment; 13) TEE. special, use permit shall be exercised with physical construction under building permit within one year from the date of the special: use permit approval, by Ohe Village Council along with The approved staging Milan for construction. Failure to construct within one year will automatically void the special vse permit approval and said permit will be withdrawn-by the Village Council; and - 4 - 12/21 ;,,;, ; . be improved as a Village public street in accordance with Village standards; 6) The permitted development shall provide a housing opportunity for low and moderate income persons, providing no less than ten percent or no more than twenty percent of all its approved dwelling units for low- moderate income families as defined by federn guidelines by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Such units shall be distributed as close to equally throughout each approved residential building; 7) The special permit holder shall agree to enter into negotiated easements for public utility routes and areas that would need to cross through the site serving other adjacent areas; 8) 'Pne special permit use folder shall prepare a revised off - street parking arrangement and make design accomodati.ons for bus stop facilities to pro- vide such service to the site. Further, a bus stop facility shall be pro- vided and operationally available at the time of occupancy; 9) The special use permit holder shall have a neighborhood public park obligation based upon the ten acres per 1000 population objective out- lined in the Planning Commission adopted plan. The populations assigned per dwelling unit to determine acre demands shall be those advanced in the plan. The application of space demands shall be converted to a mone- tary renumeration to the Village r.adier than land, since no public park is planned on the subject property. The application of a park charge shall be determined at the time of building permit request and shall be collected at the time when 75% of all units within any one building is approved; 10) The approximately one acre tract located in the southeast corner of the proposed development: currently owned by Richard Keller shall be merged under one common owner:ahi.p control with the special permit site. The special use permit holders shall be required to accomplish this condition and legally demonstrate, ownership prior to the Village allowing any build- ing permits of any type to the special permit property. Further, the special use permit holders shall develop an expanded site plan which in- corporates the Keller property into the total site plan. Such site plan shall be reviewed and approved by the'Village Council prior to any.build- ing permit activity for fire special use permit site; 11) All eristing buildings on the special use permit site shall be removed prior to the first occupancy call of any building unit on the site; 12-)'A landscaping and final grading plan shall be provided to the Village at the time of building plan review by Village for architectural comment; 13) TEE. special, use permit shall be exercised with physical construction under building permit within one year from the date of the special: use permit approval, by Ohe Village Council along with The approved staging Milan for construction. Failure to construct within one year will automatically void the special vse permit approval and said permit will be withdrawn-by the Village Council; and - 4 - 12/21 v y � l� 14) The applicant shall agree in writing to the above conditions within 30 days of Council special. use permit approval, failure to do so will cause the Council to rescind and withdraw the approval of said special use permit. b. Mr. James Larkin, attorney representing the Condor Corporation, spoke on behalf of the proposal and discussed the conditions. C. Mr. James Riley, President of the Condor Corporation, also spoke re- garding the request. d. After much. discussion, Councilman Greavu mov ap proval of the Planned Unit Devel2pment to the Vi11 e M anage r' s cond with t ex-- c ept - iv n of condition Nv,_10: No. ll. to read: if c o nstru ct - ion on sec ^ buildin doe not. cc- meen_ within 1.8 months af ter_ the o of first building Cvnditivn i. 10 to be lef in: t he C ouncil r the acquisition of the Kellerroaert at the me"i.n into the s ec;_aI. rmi:: 1 —_--p site; C onditi on iivo._1 t o b e r b ored to Is and c No, 1 t be: at�r.oval_ con ditioned upon usage of buildings as con noc to exceed _d of 25.38 neo)le�ier_a after development and o._cupat_or. of ^Ch bu il .d ines a pr.ojec�ted densiy of 22 people i._s_d re -_ consi deration m be called f or. a four building Seconded by Councilman Olmstead. e. Councilman Wiegert moved an amendme t c ondi tion No , 1 wh woul re -r.e the ac( u isi tion of the Ke ller Property prio to occupanc of the second_ building. ^— —'� Seconded by Councilman Ilaugan. Ayes - all. Vote now taken on the original motion. Ayes - all. ASgEE ?TENT FORM FOR > _ GuNDI' "1RPvS I *IpOSEll .I3Y: ,� Village Council L � Board of Appeals Q Building Board of Appeals This agreement made this 19th day of J _ ,19 73 between James R. Riley hereinafter called the owner of the land described in this agreement; and Condor Co rporation , hereinafter called the applicant and the above indicated Municipal Body, acting on behalf of the Village of Maplewood, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, here- inafter called the Village: Whereas, the owner and applicant claim, represent, and warrant that they are th; only parties who have interest in the following F parcel. of land M building: Whereas, the owner and applicant have received approval from the Village for use of land X and /or building _ X subject to performance to the following imposed conditions by the Village: (see attached Exhibit #1 for Village imposed conditions) Whereas, the Village acted to impose said conditions in Exhibit l /l.. on 21St _ day of December __,19 72 in the conduct of its official business meetiui, minutes which appear. as Exhibit #2 attached hereto; and Whereas, the owner and applicant have read all imposed conditions; Now, therefore, it is agreed, that the owner and applicant acknowledge by signing this agreement that said owner and applicant: Acknowledges the existence of the imposed conditions; understands all imposed conditions thoroughly; and agrees to conform and /or comply with all declared imposed conditions on or before any occupancy permit is issued by said Village for such land or building use approved by the Village. Owner-, � Witness ., 1 2 3. 4. Applicant B) By: REQUEST Revision to the Special Use Permit Planned Unit Development for Condor Corporation. Specifically, request is made for consideration to approve the Building A (Fourth building for site) which was excepted from the original approval on December 21, 1972 by the Village Council._ BACKGROUND: In the Special Use Permit approval on December 21, 1972 the Village Council approved the development subject to a number of conditions. Of particular interest was: 1. Condition No. 1 stated: "The site plan concept is approved with the exception that Building A is not approved at this time nor the related off - street parking of 198 spaces or (sic) Building A," 2. Condition No. 14 stated: "approval is conditioned upon usaae of buildings as condominiums, not to exceed density of 25.88 people per acre, if after development and occupation of three buildings a projected density of 22 people is demonstrable, reconsideration may be called fora fourth building." REASON FOR REQ UEST: Condor Corporation at this time wishes to proceed with the 3rd building and 4th buildings for the site adjacent to the south side of Lower Afton Road. In order to plan and effect construction of the 3rd building the site grading, drainage, and sanitary sewer utility for . the entire area adjacent to the Afton Road side of the Project Site must be planned and finally determined prior to the 3rd Building construction start. Consequently, it is appropriate that both the '3rd and 4th buildings be addressed prior to any final development plans being prepared for the area immediately adjacent to Lower Afton Road within the site. JUSTIFICATION FOR FOURTH BUILDING 1. POPULATION DENSITY Based upon the December 21, 1972 Special Use Permit approval, three (3) buildings were approved for the 26.01 acre site along with a condition that the maximum population density that would be allowed for the site with the three (3) buildings would be 25.88 people per acre. When multiplied out this approved situation could result in maximum on-- site.population of 673.13 people on 26.01 acres within 3 buildings. The original approval never specified number of total dwelling units allowed. But rather, the approval specified number of buildings and maximum population density allowed under the Special Use Permit. The existing two buildings now constructed each have . 96 dwelling units per building. The proposed additional 3rd and 4th buildings would also have 96 dwelling units each and would be identical in shape, configuration, and exterior building design and materials. It has been the current experience that there are presently 158 dwelling units sold in the 1st and 2nd buildings that are constructed. That 158 units has resulted in a actual population of 266 people. This experience population results in a population density of 1.68 persons per dwelling unit occupied. When multiplying the proposed 4 buildings at 96 dwelling units each (384 units) times the actual experienced population density per dwelling unit to date (1.68), the resultant total Development projected population would then be 645.12 people with 4 buildings as opposed to the 673.13 Development' population now allowed under the Special Use Permit of December 21, 1972. The conclusion is that the current approved population density allowed in the Special Use Permit for three' buildings. exceeds the projected Development population for four buildings on site based on actual population density experience for occupation of 41% of the total 384 units that would be constructed with 4'buildi.ng$. Based on the approved density of 25.88 people per acre for 26.01 acres with 3 buildings on site there could be 400 total dwelling units;;as opposed to the fact that the proposed 4 building plan for the site would result in 384 dwelling units on site. 2. SANITARY SETTER The sanitary sewer that will serve the third and fourth buildings is located on the north side of Lower Afton Road and is a Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Trunk Interceptor: It is very shallow in depth and consequently, sanitary sewer connection to it will require that a connect point near the far west side of the Condor property in order to serve the buildings proposed with gravity sanitary sewer. This situation requ sewer be planned in this time. Contact Commission resulted would be allowed to Council approval. ires that placement of the sanitiary. conjunction with both buildings at with the Metropolitan Waste Control with an indication that a connection the interceptor subject to City The Fourth building proposed would according to projected population (already indicated) result in less projected sewer affluentwaste being discharged into the trunk sanitary sewer than if only three buildings are allowed but developed to the maximum density permitted under the Special Use Permit. 3. STORM WATER GENERATION The storm waters that would be geperated on site with three buildings (built to the maximum density) would result in more on site storm water generation and ponding requirement than would be the case if four buildings were constructed on site as proposed. The basis for calulating storm generation and pondi.ng would be a 100 year storm. (Consultation with Barr Engineering -- Ramsey- tlashingi:on Metro Watershed District engineering consultants confrims that a 100 year storm should be the design base storm). 4. SITE GRA AND EARTHWORK The site grading and earthwork required for the site with 2 more buildings similar to the Fwo already constructed on site will result in less site grading and earthwork than if the site is developed with solely an additional third building that achieves that maximum density permitted under the Special Use Permit. 5. SITE BUILDING -HARD SURFACE COVER The site will have less building and hard surface area coverage and more open space with the four building proposal than if the site is developed with a remaining third building which achieves the maximum Special Use Permit density already approved. 6. PUBLIC SERVICE DEMANDS The site developed with the four buildings will result in less projected population which will lessen the public service demands in terms of sewage disoharge;r water consumption; traffic congestion; refuse removal; municipal services; etc. CONCLUSION: The preceding is supportive for revising the approved Special Use Permit to.allow at this time a fourth building which is limited to a maximum of 96 dwelling units and is similar in layout, design, external appearance. Further, the total site shall be limited to 384 total dwelling units to be composed of 4 buildings having 96 dwelling units each. . 6 DATA 3zp 3xp P.aUIL. Dlh4G� �GOM PSI N CPS XISTI 44"4Z'07 7 n2 g1•o w I I- 0"rI 11-4 I, A, —1:5z bD I IUD! W l 4 ND Pwt-Hllwc -, OQIT6 ,quo PvPUI.A "1'►DH N S i g a 4 0 c ro m N bD I IUD! W l 4 ND Pwt-Hllwc -, OQIT6 ,quo PvPUI.A "1'►DH DONALD L. LAIS JOHN F. BANNIGAN, JR. JEROME D. CIRESI PATRICK J. KELLY Mr. Geoffry Olson Director Community Development 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 RE: Connemara P.U.D. Dear Sir: This is in response you ask: 1. How c' of determining site 2. Since can the City submit September 27, 1979 AREA CODE 612 224.9]61 to your letter dated September 10, 1979 wherein 3mmitted is the City to the original method density based on actual occupancy? and; the applicant has initiated the revision process, a revision request of its own? In response to the first question we submit the following. The City is no more committed to the methods of determining site density than it is to its zoning ordinance. Both are suseptible to amendment if so dictated by the police concerns of the City as determined by its council sitting in legislative deliberation. In response to the second question we answer in the affirmative. Since the approval of the Connemara Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) in 1972, the City has adopted a comprehensive Land Use Plan whereunder a differing method of determining population density is articulated. Should densities set forth in the approved P.U.D. be in excess of or the method of determination conflict with the comprehensive Land Use Plan, the City may properly reconsider and if deemed necessity for the public welfare, amend said P.U.D. to conform thereto. So long as no vested rights have accrued in the proposed third and LAIS, BANNIGAN & CIRESI, P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 5TH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101 , Mr. Geoffry Olson September 27, 1979 Page Two fourth buildings proposed, the City may initiate a review for amendment consistent herewith. Respectfully submitted, L'AIS, CIRESI A n F. Bann lewood Ci Cc: Mr. Barry Evans City Manager Mr. Donald L. Lais nti,'JrI Attorney l Density Calculations for 4 - 96 unit Buildings, based on'the City Land Use Plan. Density per Building 18 - 1 BR. X 1.4 people /unit = 25.2 people 78 - 2 BR. X 2.5 people /unit = 195 ep ople 96 units 220.2 people /building 220.2 people /building X 4 buildings = 880.8 people Acreage 26.01 Acres Density Bonus for Underground Garages 84 units X 300 sq. ft.. = 2.7 acres 26.01 acres + 2.7 acres = 28.71 acres Site Density = D80.8 peopl = 30.7 people /ac 28.71 acres Maximum Density allowed by Plan = 22 people / acre Excess density = 8.7 people /acre Density Calculations for 3 - 96 unit Buildings, based on the City's Land Use Plan Density per building 18 - 1 BR. X 1.4 people /unit = 25.2 people 78 - 2 BR. X 2.5 people /unit =195 people 96 units 220.2 people /building 220.2 people /building X 3 buildings - 660.6 people Acreage 26.01 acres Density Bonus for Underground Garages 288 units X 300 sq. ft = 2.0 acres 26.01 acres + 2.0 acres = 28.01 acres Site density = 660.6 )eo le = 23.6 peo /acre 28.01 acres Maxim Dens allo by Plan = 22 people /acre Excess density = 1.6 people /acre Density calculations for 2 - 96 unit Buildings and 1 -•73 Unit Building, based on the Land Use Plan Density per Building for buildings 1 and 2: 18 - 1 BR. X 1.4 people/unit eo le t =195 2 p eople 78 - 2 B_ RX_ 2_5._P — 220.2 pe /building 96 units eo le 220.2 people /building X 2 buildings = 440.4 p, p Density in Building 3 (assuming 10 one bedroom units and 63 two bedroom units): 10 -1 BR. X 1.4 people /unit = 14 people 63 -2 BR___X_2_`'__Le /unit =157.5, o p e 73 ununits Total population in 3 buildings = 611.9 people in 265 units Acreage = 26.01 acres Density bonus for underground garages: 265 X 300 square feet = 1.83 acres 26.01 acres + 1.83 acres = 27.84 acres 611.9 = 22.0 people /net acre Site Density = 27.84 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Compliance With Council Conditions for Connemara Property. DATE: November 1, 1979 There are two sets of conditions to be concerned about on the Connemara property - the 1972 PUD conditions and the building and site plan approval conditions for Connemara II. Compliance with the 1972 PUD permit conditions is as follows (see minutes of December 21, 1972 enclosed with Staff report): 1. The applicant is requesting an amendment to this condition to allow the construction of a fourth building. 2. This condition has been met for the first two buildings. Sanitary sewer is available on Lower Afton Road. The line is owned by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. Approval will be required from the M14CC for connection to their line. Water is not available on Lower Afton Road. Water must be extended to the site. 3. This condition will have to be complied with before construction of Connemara III or IV. We have not received written permission from the Sewer Board as of this date yet. 4. This condition cannot be met if this site is developed. Any development will increase the volume of.run -off. Staff is also recommending that a greater rate of run -off be allowed than is stated in this condition. Since the permit was approved in 1972, the City has had a drainage study don in 1974. This study would allow a greater rate of run -off. Staff is recommending that the rate of run -off allowed from this project be in compliance with the 1974 Drainage Plan. There has been some siltation control into the pond as part of the initial construction. A permanent solution will need to be implemented. A feasibility study was recently presented to the City Council, proposing siltation control and piping. Council did not order the siltation :control portion of the project. 5. This condition has been complied with.. 6. Staff has no record that this condition has been complied with. l 7. This condition has not been complied with. We cannot ask for easements, however, until we know the exact location where they are needed. The City's engineering consultants are preparing this information. A request for the easements will be made shortly. 8. This condition has been complied with. 9. Since this condition was approved, the City has adopted a new Park Availability Charge system. The applicant has been charged according to this new policy. 10. This condition has been complied with. 11. This condition has been complied with. 12. This condition has been complied with. 13. This condition has been complied .with. 14. The applicant is requesting an amendment to this condition to allow the construction of a fourth building based on the actual density of the first two buildings. See enclosed staff report. 15. This condition has been complied with. The second set of conditions pertain to the Connemara II approval on May 11, 1978. Compliance with the conditions is as follows: 1. The grading permit has been issued by the City. 2. This condition has not been complied with. The grading work required for the property south of the east /west drainage course has not been complied with. 3. This condition was changed after negotiation with the City Attorney to a$30,000 letter of credit. The letter was submitted. The City Engineer attempted to collect on the letter 30 days before it expired, but was unable to do so. A one year extension on the letter of credit was then accepted 4. This condition has not been complied with. 5. This condition was complied with. 6. This condition has been complied with. 7. This condition has not been complied with. We are not in a position to ask for these easements to be dedicated until we know their exact location This will be determined shortly. 8. The building permit has been issued. 9. This condition was complied with. E 10. This condition will have to be complied with upon construction of Connemara III. 11. This condition has been complied with. 12. This condition has been complied with. 3 a. The parking lot on the East side to be set back fifteen feet (15 from the .proposed lot line; b. Berming shall be provided to screen the parking lot from Londin Lame; berming to be a minimum of 2' feet high;, c. Internal parking lot drive to be a minimum of 25 feet wide; d. Parking lot spaces to be a,minimum of 10' wide. 12. Developer to agree to these conditions in writing, b. 'Mr. James Riley, Condor Corp., discussed the conditions. He requested the City initiate a drainage improvement. He stated he is willing to grant the necessary easements. He also stated he could not provide a letter of credit but could provide a bond. C. Councilman Anderson moved to app subject to the following conditions: 1. Grading permit to be issued jimnediately risk; footing permit to be issued after and 7; 2. The grading and drainage plan to be fo1 which encompasses the entire P.U.1 site form to the Soil Conservation Service's follows: at applicants (Mr. Riley's) own compliance of conditions 3, 5, 6 lowed is that submitted on May 1, 1978 The plan is to be modified to con- recommendations (attached) as a. The proposed plan calls for terracing at location No. 6 (location number as referenced in Soil Conservation Service report). The terracing should be more pronounced in order to reduce the grade to eliminate erosion potential. b. Location No. 7 to have piping and catch basin installed to safely conduct water down slope. As an alternative, a terracing system similar to that proposed for location #6 will suffice. c.. Recommendations of the Soil'Conservation Service as to bank stabilization are to be implemented. It is the intent of natural drainage co to final grade. The recommendations to the North of the will not be brought in the P.U.D. this condition to have all properties South of the irse running East and West through the site; constructed to control the existing erosion problems on properties drainage course must also be implemented. This area to final grade until additional construction commences 3. Developer to submit acceptable assurances that a bond will be supplied in the amount of $75,000.00 will be submitted within 30 days to insure compliance. with the grading plan. 4. Grading and drainage facilities lying East of the proposed underground piping project are to be completed prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit _. and before December 1, 1978. The area above and to the West of the proposed piping project is to have final grading finished by the -Developer within six the building and site plan fo(- Co nnema ra II '(6) months of notification of completion of the City drainage project. If the approved grading and drainage plan is not carried out by this time, the City will complete the project under the bond. 5_. Developer to petition the City for a public works improvement project to construct the drainage facilities on the West side of the,property and drainage Pond "B ". 16. Submittal of the plan presented to the Watershed District, approved by the City Engineer, indicating the temporary erosion control measures to be implemented during construction. 7. Dedication of the following easements: a. A permanent easement for the underground'piping along the drainage channel on the West side of the property. The easement to be twenty feed (20) wide with the right to enter, construct and maintain together with the right to drive over the surface thereof for maintenance purposes; In the event the City has to re- enter, it has the right to extend beyond the 2C foot perimeter as reasonable Engineering practices may require wit:. out consideration, conditioned upon restoration to prior condition and qualit b. A permanent flowage easement around that portion of the so- called "Arnie Johnson" pond that covers the Condor site, said easement to peip etuate the storage area currently maintained there; c. A permanent ponding easement for retention, settling and desilting situated generally where Pond "B" is shown on the Developer's previous submissions; d. Such temporary construction easements as field surveys and construction ,details necessary to accomplish the project. B. Final building permit to be issued, subject to building official's approval of construction plans, substantial completion of rough grading, and compli- ance with condition ;19. 9. Submittal of a detailed plan, approved by the City Engineer, indicating the final configuration and drainage facilities associated with Pond "C" and "D" 10. Pond C and D in their final design shall be constructed in conjunction with Connemara III. 11. The project is to be constructed in accordance with the following design elements (reference plot plan): a. The parking lot on the East side to be set back fifteen feet (15') from the proposed lot line; b. Berming shall be provided to screen the parking lot from Londin Lane; berming to be a minimum of 2 feet high; C. Internal parking lot drive to be 6 minimum of 25 feet wide; d. Parking lot spaces to be a minimum of 10' wide. y 5/11 C. Ten (10) perking spaces shall be eliminated from the plan. 12.• Developer to agree to conditions in writing. Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes — all. ADJOURN 10:19 P.M Clerk 5 - 5/11 B. Rezoning - Eldridge Avenue (R -1 to R -2) Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting a zone change from R -1 to R -2 to construct a double dwelling. Staff is recommending approval as outlined in their report. Mr. Schreier said he would answer questions if the Commission has any. Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone else•oresent who wished to comment Commissioner Sherburne m oved the Planni -g_ dom reco mmend to the _Council anoroval of the rezoning from R-1 to R -2 on the basis that: 1. Council had previously intended to rezone this lot in return for the abandonment of the 1973 PUD. This was not done, because of an administrative oversight. 2. The rezoning would be consistent with the Land Use Plan. Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes all. 9. OLD BUSINESS A. PUD Revision - Connemara (Condor Corporation) Secretary Olson said this was last considered by the Planning Commission at their meeting of October 15. Commission tabled the item at that time for staff to present information as to what conditions the applicant has complied with as outlined in the 1972 PUD permit and the building and site review conditions for Connemara II. Staff is recommending denial of the proposed amendments as outlined in their report. Commissioner Fischer asked if there were any Commission minutes found regarding this development, that would have occurred about the same time as the lot division. She questioned if a.trail was shown on one of the plans. Secretary Olson said he did talk to the Community Services Director and he did recall some discussion about a trail going through the property. However, they are now recommending that the trail go through the fire station property to the east. Bailey Seida, Harry Johnson Companies, representing Condor Corporation, said they have discussed the drainage with Barr Engineering who are the District Watershed Engineers. They are required to design to a 100 year storm. This has been complied with. They also have the ability in that plan to hold all of the water of a 100 year storm without any discharge from the site. The PUD indicated that discharge cannot be any greater after development than before. They have, therefore, developed this discharge plan. The Commission asked at the last meeting if the condition regarding mixed housing had been met. After researching minutes, it was determined that at the time Connemara II was proposed for review by Council, there was discussion of the mixed housing but not recorded in the minutes, the tone was that the Council would not be discussing housing at this time He did not think the City would issue the building permit for building #2 if they wished to have a mix of housing for low and moderate income people. They are asking for consideration of their proposal in light of their density within the site rather than using the 'Comprehensive Plan densities. 7 11 -5 -79 He believes that according to 'the 1972 PUD building number three has been approved. They are asking for Building #4 at this time. They believe the fourth building would give a balance to the site, it has always been in the planning stage. Commissioner Sherburne said he thought the Commission and City would be on firm ground to hold to the Comprehensive' Plan densities and the people per unit as this has been adopted by the City through adoption of the ordinance. Commissioner Fischer said she thought the fourth building should be denied. She thought building #4 was something that was considered at the time and.not an outright obligation of the City to permit development of it. Commissioner Pellish said the condition on the low and moderate income units said they were to be distributed equally throughout each approved residential building. He did not think there was low income housing in any of the buildings. He thought all of the items not complied with should be considered at this time. Commissioner Sherburne 1. The City's Land Use Plan was adopted in September, 1973, after a con- siderable amount of discussion, public hearings, and citizen input. It has since been the basis for all of the City's Planning fo r sewer,water, storm water control, parks, streets, and population pro- jections. 2. The Land Use Plan is based on maximum, rather than actual densities. While the present densities in the first two buildings may be lower than those projected in the Land Use Plan, densities may increase with changing birth rates and living patterns. 3. The fourth building would substantially exceed the number of units allowed by the City's Land Use Plan. 4. Since the 1973 Land Use Plan was adopted after the 1972 PUD permit„ the City Council may reconsider the permit based on conflicts with .the City Plan. 5. Since no building permits have been issued or foundations constructed, there is no significant vested interest in a fourth building. 6. The Land Use Plan is the basis for determining maximum densities in all multiple zoning districts in the City. 7. For the above reasons, denial of a fourth building is in the best interests of the public welfare. 8 11 -5 -79 .. 1 Further, the Commission recommends that Council revise condition #14 of the PUD permit as follows; based on the findings in the first recommendation: 14. Approval is conditioned upon usage of buildings as condominiums. References to density for a fourth building in condition 14 of the 1972 PUD are deleted. Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes all. 10 COMMISSION OMMISSION PRESENTATIONS Chairman Axdahl said he received a. letter from the Corp of Engineers regarding the Toyota Dealership at Beam and Highway 61. They decided it was not in the public interest, therefore, the Engineer denied the request for a permit.to place fill material in wetlands adjacent to Kohlman Lake. Chairman Axdahl said a work session is scheduled for November 12 on the Comprehensive Plan Update. Secretary Olson said the consultant will be making a general presentation on the Update. Chairman Axdahl said on November 1 the Council approved the preliminary plat for Crestview Third Addition, approved the special use permit for the Gladstone Community Center and the building moratorium as requested by Mr. Krinkie was denied. 1.1. STAFF PRESENTATIONS 12. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 10:20 P.M. 1 I i NOTICE OF HEARING F June 1.3, 1980 To: Mrs. Lucille R. Boda, dba Bedell, Inc., 1690 White Bear Avenue From: The City of Maplewood Subject: Notice of Hearing Forfeiture of 'Off -Sale" Liquor Bond at 7:45 p.m., June 19, 1980, Maplewood City Council Chambers On October 20, 1979, an underage sales arrest was made at your .licensed "off- sale" liquor establishment, Bodell., Incorporated. On February 27, 1980, the employee involved in this sale entered a guilty plea and was sentenced by the court to $100 or 10 clays, $50 was suspended. In accordance with the City of Maplewood Municipal Code Section 703.080, Paragraph 2, which reads in part as follows: "Bond . . . . . (c) That in the event of any violation of the provisions of any law relating to the business for which the license has been granted for the sale of intoxicating liquor, such bond shall be forfeited to the municipality in which such license was issued." Notice is hereby given a hearing on carrying out: the provisions of Code Section 703.080, relating to your bond, will be held at the Maplewood City Council meeting at 7:45 p.m., June 1.9, 1980, at 1380 Frost Avenue. cc City Clerk Liquor File City Manager Aotion by Counoil: Endorsed Modified— Rejected— Date April 29, 1980.. MEMORANDUM To: City Manager Barry Evans From: Deputy Chief of Police T. L. Hagen Subject: Illegal Liquor Sales On October 20, 1979, a 16- year -old girl. was observed exiting Bodell Spirit Corner Liquor Store, 1690 White Bear Avenue, carrying two 24 -can cases of Schmidt Strong beer. Investigation revealed she had purchased them from a clerk who did not card her or attempt to verify her age. Also present was Lucille Boda, who identified herself as the store owner. Clerk Thomas James Keim, 23 years, was cited for underage sales. He appeared in court and pled not guilty, demanding a jury trial. On February 27, 1980, he changed his plea to guilty and was sentenced by the court to $1.00 or 10 days, $50 was suspended. ' Lucille Boda was also cited under City Ordinance 701.110. Ms. Boda, on November 14, 1979, pled guilty, and a stay of imposition of sentence was granted to February 11, 1980. On February 11, 1980, she failed to appear, and a warrant was issued. On March 17, 1980, she surrendered to the court, and tier attorney, John Daubney, filed a motion to withdraw her guilty plea. That motion was recently granted by Judge Kirby. Ms. Boda's next court appearance is set for June 16, 1980. Ms. Boda's complaint has been amended to the corporation. Be further advised that on March 1.5, 1980, Steven John Boda, 24, was cited for underage sales. He is charged with selling to a 16- year -old boy. He has requested a jury trial,.which is scheduled in the near future. In view of the above history, the Police Department requests the City Counc:cl hold a hearing for revocation of bond as provided in Ordinance 703.080, Paragraph (2) C. TLH:js cc 80- 002758 Liquor File/ City Clerk .. LIQUOR AND BEER 701.100. MUSIC. -All music, by whatever means provided, is hereby prohibited upon the premises of any "on sale" licensee between the hours of 900 o'clock P.M. of any one day and 9000 o'clock A.M. of the following day, except where such premises are duly licensed as a tavern under the ordinances of the village? provided that an "on sale" 1 is hereby permitted to operate a radio or phonograph and obtain music therefrom between said hours of 9,00 o'clock P.M. and 9800 o'clock A.M., pro - vid.ed further that the tone of such radio or phonograph is modulated so as not to annoy the occupants of nearby premises. The failure of any "on sale" licensee using a radio or phonograph between said hours to keep the same from becoming a nuisance to occupants of nearby premises shall be deemed sufficient cause, in the discretion of the Council, to revoke his license to sell such non - intoxicating malt liquor. i 701.110. VIO.LAT%ON BY AGENTS. Any act of any clerk, barkeeper, agent, ser- vant, or employee, in vi.oiation hereof, shall be deemed the act of the employer and license of such place, as well as that of said clerk, barkeeper, agent, servant, or employee, and every such employer and licensee shall be liable to all the penal- ties provided herein for the violation of same, equally with the said clerk, bar- keeper, agent, servant, or employee. 701.120. INTOXICATING LIQUOR IN POSSESSION. It shall be unlawful for any person duly licensed to sell non -- intoxicating malt liquor, but not duly licensed to sell intoxIc ating liquor, or for any of his agents, servants, or employees to have in their possession on said licensed premises intoxicating liquor for the purpose of consumption by any one, 701,030. DEFINITION OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR. For the purposes of this ordi- nance, :ntox'cati.nf; liquor. is hereby defined to mean and include ethyl alcohol and ary distilled, lled, ferent.ed., spirituous, vinous, or malt liquid of any kind potable as a beverage, which liquor contains an alcoholic content in excess of 3.2 percent thereof by weight, 701.040 PUTY OF POLICE OFFICER. It is hereby made the duty of the police off'cers of the ` 11age to notify the council whenever any person is convicted of a violation of this ordinance. Such conviction be deemed sufficient cause for the Council to revoke any license issued to such convicted person under this ordinance. 701.050. LICENSE PERIOD. Licenses herein provided for shall run for a period of one year from July let, and if' for a shorter period. than one year, the license fee shall be pro rated on a monthly basis. 701. 060. MANUFACTURERS AND DISTRIBUTORS. Nothing herein contained shall be construed to prohibit the sale and delivery in original. packages direct.to the consumer by the manufacturer or distributor of non- intokicati.ng malt liquors. (Source& Ord. 36) -114- 7 �S� Section 3. The Naplewood Code, Section 703.080, Paragraph (2) is amended to read as follows: "(2) BOND. No "on sale" license shall be granted until a bond in the amount of Three Thousand and 00 /100 ($3,000.00) Dollars has been furnished, approved by and filed wi. the proper Village officers. Such bond shall cover both the regular "on sale" license and any Sunday sales license issued to the same licensee. No "off- sale" license shall be granted until a bond in the sum of One Thousand. Dollars ($1,000.00) shall be furnished and approved by the state Liquor Control. io::unissioner and the Village Council, arhd filed witch the proper Village officers'. Tire surety on such bond shall be a surety company duly licensed to do business in the State of Iiinnesota,'and the bond shall be approved as to form and execution by the Village Attorney. All bonds when approved by the proper Village or state officers, as the case msy be, shall be deposited with tine Village Clerk. All such bonds, hAhe. her "off sale" or "on sale" shall be conditioned as fo'.lcsjs: (a) 14rat the licensee wili obey the law rela!:ing to such licensed business. (b) That t licensee will pay to t_he rhuaicipali.ty, when due, all taxes, lice0s fees, penalties and ot" 'r ci:arres orovi3ed by la•.:. (c) 'T!at in Cite ev•znt of ashy violation of the provisions of any law rel-ating to the business for which the l:icensc !s ,is been granted for tile sale of into ; :icatiu„ lieuor, such bond shall be forfeitcd to the aunicipality in ;:rich such license was issue, (d) Tfhat the li.e :lsee will pay, to the e „tent of the principal amount of such bond, any d.: ^..a ,es for death or in;ury caused ' or. resulti.:hr from the violation of any Provisions of law rel.: to t'.he business fo'i whic:lh st!cil J. t' cep.se°_ has been gran'Led a license, and further conditioned thot such recovery ma be had also against the surety on his ; The ataount speci i.ed in any 'hond required is hereby declared to be a penalty and the amount recoverable shall be measured by t'r:e actual damages, provided however that the surety thereon. shall not be liable for any amount ir, c::cess o: the penal amount of the bond. :•.11 such bonds shall, be for the hcuefit of the obligee and of all persons suffering dama_cs by reason of the ')reach of the conditions thcreof„ Such bonds shhall rush to the village oblir,ee, and in the event o,: a forfeiture of any such bout for viol.ati.n ;r of the lc:w,'t , .c Di_ °trict Court of :amsey county may forfeit the penal Sum of the said bond to Che Ville -e.” Section 4. This ordina:lce shall take effect and be in force froin and after its passage and publication. Passed this day o 01 (,:.c/ , 1467 by the0ounci' of the rilla f pjewood I STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSIONER AS PROVIDED BY MINNESOTA STATUTES 340.85, SUBDIVISION 2, THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM THE RECORDS OF THIS: COURT Located in MAPLEWOOD )Name of Municipality) This certifies that 27, 1980 1Dat THOMAS JAMES KEIM of Defendan id appear in this Court on the charge of Selling Intoxicating Liquor to Minor The above named defendant XX plead guilty was found guilty as charged and was sentenced as follows: $100.00 or 10 days, t $50.00, Balance suspended to th c ourt. Bodells Spirit Corners (Name of Licensee) has been issued the following license or licenses to sell alcoholic beverages: 3.2 Beer On -Sale 3.2 Beer. Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor. Sale Intoxicating Liquor x Off -Sale By City of Maplewood, 1380 Frost Avenue, Maplewood, Minn. 55109 Iasulag Authority and Name of Municipality or County) Indicate herein if the defendant is an employee of the Licensee Yes Signed / j Title Senior Clerk of Court Court Maplewood Mun icipal Court - ��q /JIJI l n x/137 I '/ P STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSIONER AS PROVIDED BY MINNESOTA STATUTES 340.85, SUBDIVISION 2, THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM THE RECORDS OF THIS;'COURT Located i This certifies that IIodell Inc. Maplewood (Name of Hunicipalit) on June 16, 1980 (Date) AName of Defendant) id appear in this Court on the charge of Sell intoxicating li.auor to minors The above named defendant XX plead guilty was found guilty as charged and was sentenced as follows: $100.00 suspended to court IIodell Inc. of Licensee s been issued the following license or licenses to sell alcoholic beverages: 3.2 Beer On -Sale 3.2 Beer Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor X Off -Sale B City of Maplewood, 1380 Frost Avenue, Maplewood, Minn. 55109 Issuing Authority and Name of Hunicipality or County) Indicate herein if the defendant is an employee of the Licensee #137 Signed Title _ Senior Clerk Court Ramsey County Municipal Court / M" /I LAW OFFICES OF (� PETERSON, BELL & CONVERSE �.°ce ' �6 E��� PHONE: 612- 224.4703 R June 17, 1980 JUN 191980 Memo To: Richard W Schaller, Director of Public SafetyyAPLEWOOD From: Martin J Costello POLICE Re: MAPLEWOOD -VS- BODELL INC. Corporate Defendant Bodell Inc pleaded guilty to the October 20, 1979 selling intoxicating liquor to a minor charge,contrary to statute §340.19 Subd. 1(a), a misdemeanor,in Ramsey County Municipal Court,Division 6,Maplewood on June 16. The Court imposed a fine of $100 or 10 days and suspended it because the companion case of Thomas Kiem had already assessed the corporationa $100 fine. This disposition is for your information. MJC _ n t ^® 4 l J TO : City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE : Award of Bids for DATE: June 12, 1980 MEMOkANDUM ,cVC d Insurance .oLion by Council:) Enaoroed— Mod if 1 ed. _._ --•— RefCated --- -•- P ROPOSAL It's proposed that the City's existing insurance policies for workers compensation, auto, and liability coverages be renewed effective July 1, 1980 as recommended by the Agents Insurance Committee. BACKGROUND It has been past practice to have the Agents Insurance Committee solicit quotations for City insurance (liability, auto, and workers compensation) each year. Last year, Home Insurance Company was the only company that submitted a quotation. In the previous year, Home Insurance under bid Bituminous Insurance Company who was the City's carrier at the time. This year quotations were received from Home Insurance Company and the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT). The LMCIT was recently created under the authority of a Joint Powers Act (M.S. 471.59) with the objective of providing a• means by which cities can obtain needed - insurance coverage at a reasonable cost. Part of the impetus for the LMCIT was the fact that many cities have been able to get only one carrier (Home Insurance Company) to bid for their insurance. The LMCIT workers compensation program is a joint self- insured program that was started on January 1, 1980. The LMCIT property and liability program was started on June 1, 1980. Is is a joint insurance program wherein National Union Insurance Company wil'i insure all participating cities and return any excess premiums based on the loss experience of the participating cities. Attached is more detailed information for both of the LMCIT insurance programs (Exhibits A and B). In response to the creation of the LMCIT, Home Insurance Company created a Safety Program wherein the premium rating for cities is calculated separately from other businesses. The Safetv.Program also allows the potential for larger dividends based upon the Toss experience of the participating cities. In addition, Home Insurance Company has revised their premium rates to keep them competitive with the LMCIT. BID ANALYSIS The following is a comparison of 1979 insurance costs with the bids submitted: 1979 Western Costs LMCIT Home World Property $ 12,248 12,736 12, - Liability 38,296 20,079 16,550 - Auto 36,696 23,640 21,780 - Bond 368 640 548 - Paramedics 1,602 - - $1,550 Workers Comp. 102,882 80,372 85,495 - $192,092 $137,467 $T36,500 11550 The bids received indicate a substantial decrease in insurance costs which was completely unanticipated. The City's 1980 Budget for the above insurance coverages is $222,490 which was based on an estimated 15% increase over the 1979 costs. According to the Agents Insurance Committee the de- crease in premiums is caused by the City's good loss experience and a "price war" between Home Insurance Company and the LMCIT. A detailed comparison of the bids which was prepared by the Agents Insurance Committee is attached as Exhibit C. It should be noted that the $136,500 quotation listed for Home Insurance Company is $2,758 less than the amounts listed in Exhibit C. The reason for this is that there have been three adjustments for changes in the Home quotation that were made after Exhibit C was pre- pared: 1) $385 has been deducted from the property premium for the Builder's Risk insurance on the new fire station as the LMCIT quotation did not include this coverage. 2) $2,000 has been deducted from the liability premium for a reduction in the coverage limit. from $500,000 to $300,000 which is explained further in the next paragraph. 3) $373 has been deducted from the auto premium as the LMCIT quotation did not include a premium for a vehicle recently purchased. Regarding the comprehensive general liability limits, Home Insurance Company originally quoted on $500,000 which is $200,000 greater than in the past. The sole reason for this is that the State of Minnesota requires an endorsement covering them for $500,000 on the lease of a gravel pit at. Highway 36 and Barclay Street. This lease is being cancelled and conse- quently the liability limits can be decreased back down to $300,000 which will save $2,000 in premiums. (The City Attorney has indicated in the past that the City's maximum liability under Minnesota Statute 466.04 is $300,000. The basis for the LMCIT's $500,000 limit is their belief that the Courts may rule that the 1962 law which set the $300,000 liability limit is outdated and should be indexed for inflation. Also, some cities have umbrella liability insurance which doesn't become effective until a loss exceeds $500,000.) Regarding the workers compensation quotations, the LMCIT program is based upon a prospective rating plan (or standard plan) and the Home quotation was based upon a retrospective rating plan (or retro plan). Under the standard plan, the annual premium is based on an experience modification factor and is subject to adjustment only for payroll costs. Under the retro plan, the annual premium is also based on an experience modification factor and is subject to adjustment, for payroll costs. However, the retro plan premium is also based upon actual losses. The retro plan can save money when losses are low but the City is exposed to penalty premiums when losses are high. Thus, with the Home retro plan the City could earn a premium credit of up to $34,318 ($85,495 - $51,177). RECOMMENDATIO I concur with the recommendation of the Agents Insurance Committee (Exhibit D) that the insurance policies be renewed for one year with Home Insurance Company and Western World Insurance Company. A representative , of the committee will be at the Council meeting to answer questions. cc: Agents Insurance Committee Exhibit A Page 1 of league of minnes©ta cities LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST SELF - INSURED WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAM The League of Minnesota Cities' workers compensation program was created as a means of lowering cities' workers' compensation costs. The program is a joint self- insured program, and is offered through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT), a joint powers entity. (Unlike other employers, cities are not required by statute to purchase workers compensation insurance or to have the insurance department's approval to self- insure.) This self - insured program was designed for the League by Employee Benefits Administration Co. (EBA), based on a study of the actual premiums, losses, and experience modifications of over 100 cities for the past several years. How the Program Works Each city participating in the Program will deposit with the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust its workers' compensation deposit premium for its policy year. This deposit premium is calculated using standard manual rates with the applicable volume discounts and experience modification, and discounting 6% from this figure. From these deposits, LMCIT will purchase reinsurance to protect the program from catastrophic and abnormal claims, pay for administrative and loss control services, and pay claims. The balance of the deposits and reserves will be invested with the earnings accruing to the benefit of the participants. After the close of the program year, surplus monies in excess of appropriate reserves will be returned to participants under a formula taking into account the earnings and claims experience of the Trust, as well as the loss records of individual participants. Eligibility All members of the League of Minnesota Cities are eligible to participate. However, LMCIT may require a city with a poor loss record to. comply with specified safety practices as a condition of participation. Administration LMCIT has appointed Employee Benefit Administration-Co. (EBA), 6950 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 430, Minneapolis, Minnesota,:55426_as' administrator of the program. E.B.A. presently administers a similar plan for the Minnesota School Boards Association and offers a fully qualified staff in all areas of workers' (OVER) 300 hanover building, 400 cedar street, saint paul, minnesota 65101 06123 222 -2861 -2- Exhibit A Page 2 of 2 compensaticn adr,:inistration. Cost of administration of the Program.will be 10% of discounted standard premium. Services to be provided by the administrator will include: I. Determination of premium for participants. 2. On site safety inspections and development of loss control program. 3. Claims processing, investigation and payment. 4. Legal counsel for disputed claims up to the Appeals Court trial. 5. Loss reports to individual participants and to LMCIT. 6. Preparation of reports required by state authorities. Reinsurance In order to protect LMCIT from the adverse effects of catastrophic and abnormal claims, reinsurance has been arranged at a cost of 14.75% of standard premium through Ebbtide Indennity Ltd., a Bermuda based insurance company. Ebbtide is in turn rein- sured by a consortium of domestic and international reinsurers. The reinsuranee-pro- tects the trust in two ways: 1) any individual claim which exceeds $300,000 isr'paid by the reinsurance, up to $5,000,000; and 2) if total claims exceed the funds avail- able for loss payments, the reinsurance will pay all claims up to $3,000,000 in excess of the loss fund. Advantages of the Program I. Lower adminis cos ts. Conventional insurance carriers typically allow between 3C9a and 40% of the premium dollar for administrative costs. Your LP1CIT program will have comparable costs of 24.75% (10% administration plus 14.75% reinsurance). 2. Investment income. Earnings on investments will be returned to participants. Due to the long -term nature of certain workers compensation claims, substan- tial reserves will be built up in the program. These reserves, along with premium deposits, will be invested; the investment income will further reduce the program costs. 3. Loss Contro A specialized approach to loss control should provide practical assistance in reducing losses. 4. Non - profit. Since the LMCIT program is non - profit, all excess funds are available for distribution to participants. Participation This program is offered to cities through independent agents. (The agent does not have the power to bind coverage, however.) In order to receive a quotation for,partici- pation in the Program, simply fill out the'Self- insured Workers' Compensation Quotation Data Sheet available from the League office or the administrator. Administrator Employee Benefit Administration Co. 6950 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 430 . Minneapolis, MN 55426• Phone: (612) 544 -0311 Peter Tritz League of Minnesota Cities 300 Hanover Bldg., 480 Cedar St. St. Paul, MN 55101 Phone: (612) 222 -2861 12/1'2/79 C: ° 0 Exhibit g ci 0 ' F { n c p o aJ Fn sJ Page 1 of ,O - v ,n v __ N v iio '_ �� U s p > n v c ` U v .� - v . J v� - v c? � v v O ° --3 ro iii u . U aj o, +� —`� c -o r c ::? w x -J v 7 N Cl v V aj V N V -] ' rti v rn > E c_ ;s C - I v v U c {c � `n } x v° n- p I]0 aJ U >. 0 LL _ D ci N - p _ v U � N p v ao o x O 'n O .�, vi O 'U N '0 _v y O D- ±d Z c Gn Q Q } C N J 0 U -:'..= p aJ p i a) C) Q r:1 N t0 u O a) O i G, UJ ro a c o a_ o. U o CL V y L 013 V N O ppyyyy c A..1...1 C ._ (- - �J 2 U a C � `tl L. ;) y- N aJ ``_N X ; , a� aJ b _7 Q- cl- in _D Ct. — u O S cn p_ aJ L1_ in N v .0 N N t s j — E ti O L DID v — v aJ E N v :3 s° v v 'J V Q -D N v �_ ° j V Z. .E 4� v m r_ c v O 0 -- LL _J .� T O �._ .p - O v C N N LLJ , U - cn "U CJ leg > a " o x S3 -b 'a oil Oil 0 O a) ro U a ^/ C > V C O L- > C - _ ,� O 2 ro .fin v ,-, -° aj Y c LLl aJ L �� E a O O c d C C1. t (U N h0 D " N i� U a1 s QU i t o s o omQ t.Q o F- T) ° C . .. UD T L G N N U O iO C vi -� vi c_° b — N O C O u u , rU _ ° Q (1) 1, - - � v D_ b4 .� � � V U O f- C. 4j ru NL� Da rotQ o�vv v LLI + c in O O - 6) C V. -N d.!^ G-0 C V 0 it r+% Q N D_ ,- v s w O v (..L �- w GD p i.` O aj rt1 O O ._, c V N L L - O a). v �D -�� N E_ N°o - f"� U 4 C -( < L a1 C \.✓ S o G N o a v ru°pU V c b v2 v Q Gnu T U ti ro E ro al aj. ti' v E a. - o ew 'r'U e. Gnin oqv v G0 N In O N d. O O ro C GJJ > L - u . ,a ra v 'ru' u }° E > �_} v `^ «3 r° p � *' v o c v v F. a N S N v C] > ro i1 i a. c� a L 3° E E v ro N v v 3 { �.. f C 3�. CJ n aJ C rU .L V U V N }. N A :. r r� +— Q O V Q c O D o> G4 E. i n v C i E U 0 v E L U�I J `1-- N O - (7 O N. v N s r vCi 4> > ° aj - iY O U C1_ w S 2 nt O V �- o (7 U 1 a) N N v U C p ) F T7 F C N U �l c o C aJ I' O C. i N r -O (' n 00 p N +- D > CY] N O (a -CZ U N v U <u v C) v u u o f c �_/? c .c ° 7 }- a v o u �0A of (J ° I -P U rJ c�. �. � r W !� P..d Sa z XU N n., ExhibiL B S c c �D x o n w -i p uj > �,t :,3 - 0 0 6 1 D D C 0 0 Oo ff) w 0 D < . (6 01) Page 2 of 2 Q CD 0 1 Dr cl 0 w - 3 N jb L; p C) N °Q 0 " 41 (D - r on Oa (0 :3 r� O C) (D a C) z - j O - 1 0 0 ;4 (D 0 C (D cr 0 (10 0 < 00 is r ' tro (D c -% M Z M < Ol ' ZN (D N o, - F�� - N CL N 0 - OQ (D ct 0 C 0 A O . (D (D 0 0 OQ (D O r+ (D 9 N° o (D w -3 w CL D -3 x r Cl Q - 0 3 b a 5 w 0) P) T CD (D 0 CD N w W 0 (D n C :D 0- (D CL 0 w 0 0 rj 7 0 (D in fu > F 0 --. c) 0 0 0 :3 Cl X Q o 3 0- (D 0 .-7 _D 0 (T Z- M CD 0 -0 C x (D Z 0 P N N) (D �j 0 0 0 0 Q. ol ( D cl (D n. -I fx V, TJ Q 0 < M a) cQ -D 0 (f) in — -I " � (D (D D (D 0 (D 0 -0 C) �O V, 3 r iz (D m D) (D .4 (D (D r n C) 71 0 :5 Di w CL t (0 (D r < r) r) y � iT (D 0 a I () cl w tn (D < (D Oil - 0 CrQ 0 D (D O> n 0) (D Oro (D ( D -T IND (D 0 0 > (D (D Q f5 a cm (D Do CL (D D w w CT L) PO r) -3 -s (D w 3 C: -T 71 (D C) (to (T) (D Z3 F7 f. n(f) 0 >m z m CIO > T- Kz F7 f. n(f) 0 >m z m CIO > T- M. V 4-- 4� O r X Cn X W a O R 00 O m O H ] � a • v W G O m s♦ a H G V H A e O O O rn rn w O O O O O H V)- O O •-a r• O ,O O O O O O O (V ul O .O M 00 N 0 :i ul ul N M a/ r, W W Vl O O 111 r. N O 0 %O C) O o O O O O N V� J O o O O •O y a/ O 00 � ul N r1 � {a H ul 00 h O O A p4 v W C N N a/ •.f O O N A U +1 6 q u A v N N H o 0 • G v u v v ' v U G v w u v H H w •� N N o u w •-� - •.+ v �1 -� A O �4 la H LH •A Q) •O H w 6. v P. _•r�l v w a 6 a) 1 O pq o .uA� x Vl ai w w a)• m �+ 41 A W a) p!. h U t w a) G A N 1 la •ei [7 al o u O a d u a O a m p .•°.�.. P •-1 O a .,a ti lml w :j U 6 ? O pqq C N N rr v m m o 0) v N (� H v - 0 r. N O 0 %O O 0 O O o O O O O N V� J O o O •O y a/ 00 � ul N ul n ul 00 h O O x •O y a/ _ A p4 v A N N a/ •.f O A U S4 6 q u A N N H C W 1 ' v U •, v C4 m r w v H a N o u w •-� - •.+ v �1 -� vl m ai H •O H 6. v P. _•r�l O rKrr a 6 .-. N O pq o 1 Vl 1 a)• m W 41 A W a) 't O h U t w a) G A ri 1 la •ei m al e-1 u P, d a a Z o m p v � a ti w C N rr v m m o 0) v N o W v - 0 U N >, p m •-� m v' O N U ,00 N 1 m - y H rOA Ln ' G -1 •,,1 V) A U O J CQ u N Cl) ,-i In � n IJ W N G >a N O W N N H O a v •� � H N w w 1�1 G N w .-. N P. m W w 't O •,-1 Sa 0i m H u P, a m ti a GN N O N - 0 U N •-� •� O G U N 1 m 1 H A U O J .-U1 u m ,-i a7 IJ U A" •O G +�1 G U 1+ •.1 al •,4 . u m G .a G al G i.1 m p 41 G F, 7 $." G '1 0 w m 00 ,a � w U W U W D, a! U > °�a •o G 0 n a7 G N O M A. H O ri 41 `� m G G ai G G N m O vl m ro p O1 H v aJ cr v u Lr) uH G m u m ,C G U - •r1 N G N O 7, N W N w a. o vN s4 � :J a a -H a a, u u ,-1 -4 m oO •ri ..... 0 O Ca M H N M 0 14 G 0 0 G m � U PQ M H O x W H x a - < 00 00 L u 4- 0 + 0 ° o N o 0 o lJ O A cu m O i� O X X b M O p O O O O O Aa O O O O 1U n � N VA n W � O � O n ^ N w N a1 a' w O N C G O H 0). 4 1 N u O U O 0 0 u cu N �'1 C. O 0 ti O 9 4J 411 •a as a o w w " q ' o Lrl v o a ro o w 41 v a a1 N 0 •,4 N Ui •w .•-1 4 N •A N f/N 41 W bo rp .O O V) P N w o o lu 6 1.1 .G •a w U o ro Ca � , o v u y o° C ° o' C U "° N O v v m m w x N ri w V M C SI N .'a, O V N p P 4T V 1 0 O G I I.1 • N N U O H . 4 'O P. -A Ln N Sa .-1 41 H $4 p .Fi p .0 O O •r1 p R1 U a w O O O 4a w ca w U' . p N P .0 C w 44 3 G N i 3 � cu dj A la H •r W N U w � r1 w U G O b •,4 ••'� . G N •� .--i .--i N N U 1r1 4 11 :3 bo -A 'O Q) '3J •a" 14 N N �4 w .O .-I I N 44 N 'a .4 w W •.1 3 w. o W .n w o r1 •, G •� rn .�. rn rn ` w N P, IJ .O U •rl .- •A r w G •.1 W N � N .-1 FI rl Si O • r1 U rl w .-1 •,4 14 L N a n U _o .4 " O w w U P. w N O. - 1 hS. N � C N o w u w •'4 J.! 0 w G W •a a t o bO � � � jj b � W N a /'� •e�1 w p. r-4 ~ a N W •r CO P. U l} W U .O •,7 '7T P }wj U C14 r4 bo .--1 w .O O 1 U O 'U O w .-/ N N !.I N O N 9 N 0 4.1 w H •,4 p w L 'a" w.. a 1 o .0 .-1 •11 •r1 G O O.. W w El M G w .!L w .-1 . El ' " w ' N a) r-4 o v M o r� w C o. w p x C w u N 41 G N .P o N G r+ v} q .P x. w i >a co 11 C : >a w 0.. !A W O ar v 3 fgTO v W 3� b to P4 0 Ch O . N I LO 0 0 0 O O i O O O 0 0 U 0 0 0 O O O O O U p O O O O O, O 000 O O O .-1 �o In M 0 0 0 0 O, O O O O O 00 co u .0 N O M W (=,I �o to N h M ~ N L J N �o 10 ON 1 It m N w co ul � h N X O n M n w n n W d, N O0 N e Lh Ol v N L/1 0l . 00 00 L/1 q o r •1 w u w 0 4T 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O U :7I. O t(1 .-1 �o In M N bil M le J' �' d' Io �o ON N i-. u a H N ~ N tl) 0� W co V+ N a 0 v u o c a o v O 'U v 11 q o r •1 w u w 0 N 41 N p N O U w G Q a w G w "i 2 A v 8 a U V f+' G 'U H H n u N N k v 4J . 4 •O w }4 .U. . w m p r W to Z a w .n o �o x N y� A � o W o P P. a 6 W W 3 00 m r, LO U 4- O s a) X w b n. v 0 O ks N bD N Pa O 0 n •rt 1 W W N 4J ' N � .y N e m N O .0 O N u v A P. ai v O 0 •r) ro •ra P. .-a O 0 � 0 N • A N 4 o 0 i •� o C .0 w u i4i c [7 0 bo •r+ o N u� w m 4j x to 0 x o o v n w ti X. v ro� .' A O N N iJ N A" . 10 P4 aj O ' 43 O U •r1 (." 1 0 60 T ro b0 U 0 ro b0 CO P u Pa N N G N N N .') N •rl N to N N F; 3 to J.1 • O O N N A a) N O N 0 W 7 3 A V1 N a oaxa u� I 0 O O N N 0 M P. r s: C N W .G o 0) (D r+ ro N 8 o •,i a) ,4 N O a +-� 41 • n 41 x o •.e v n 41 m u U A N N N P4 fA L: 0 a) C " W •C N C _ L CU 0 a u P O g N O N 0 •!; fi w u1 P. U 0 m N N U U A u 0) 0 0 41 O 6 C " Cal Q) 60 N N p .N' 0 O u O .. Pq 0) ...-) x 0 ' q N CO � n a P 0 , .0 0 Cl 0 va C u p, u m H ° to [n w 6 0 2' P. , Er o P O O ro ta u O .--I O W 0 )-I O 41 N •O P4 ro C7 a 0 v o u� i o u u ). N P ` 9 v r 0 o " u w � O f : N p O C N ro N ro N r+ a N •a o x u w A W . 1 N AV 3 w •r C m c N a. u N W 0 0 b0 ' N N N G C 0 m u m H o"1 W In .o o N v� .0 N N U O A v •rl to v u � x O H U 4J :& a N ) ~ •O • .f {q f O N .0 O q N X r4 0 3 11 m cu y ro n m u •0 G ,' v .0 .0 N ro m Q) m ' o E N to to •r♦ 0 41 H T Q) N Q M J.) r4 6 v W ". m P4 U 3 b u ro N a O W • d 11 0 to O A N N p � m u o x A � a) o b°D � m ,4 to m� H� 0 4. � H O y m Ed9 m� wdw Y �o ffi = �•r °'cro o� b Ln N > U C W N E . V- ° ') N LL J C V D 00 w O 1 O 0 O 'O 9 N N W U. N N PI N °- C L r r L .° C 0 PI CO h «' A 0 N tlZ OdT) W �V1 0Q a LPOO DNd�a0 .N'O H N •� N O N 9 'O C r N pI O ry N LP ry D d a G y NJ w R CN iD a3 ;n cvN IOi ')+ o .2 9 O 4= Q U ' J N N O N D L Z6 0 L U N W O VUV�� W w • O N N - 03 ,O D ON O•_ OC PI NC UNC UL' NI -MMMA� Jq D Qi?EDL C QW m� E E c J �.n «�v« a� ¢a `�N;?P Nv P jN N Mw 000 E.?P i Eo me «.E vm c�t'� «� D s 0c�ot o.0o OZ Oo om. vE aE0E oa cyno �o a EQ),,.^ mL0 ENg xa7 ,s, 0 T NE E rodnD ?3mvNOrc N.° H L n.c ma` c4 N F E a s rn a n E rnW ?P v�ot E mn o N. C y No E: vo °muw d v n•opo p ep aw ^ '.o "B � wa !um d t °I ` U a : ry��c� �ig wE v o� aM 10-Ev P>i odo `) 6- •C G C G N N �' N N C , L w D 8 8 0 N° J W N d L X L n F'" M w O C N O N U W 6 U to ,G ib 0 �O a= d D in N. O N 0 1 t-, Ld IINOO C> 0-6 c N n rn> O 0 °I M �C'7 Ica LO Fw._'o ?s 1 UGHw F Om p N _ ._ E O o L W rot N N .._ C 0 C N o c N m o D N D o P O o a: o a a o 3 w d C o o n o a .0 8 N °I 2c P U N T J P %I N N O ? - U pppA W 0)) >� 0 0 Z IR O 04 } lV f') ^ Qi n V' n t M N 6 [S) V U Si « H U ' 0 ~ N N F N 10 ry tCtpp O.L b i0 Q M N M N^ M tV ^ G T v PI > O C L ro q c >�' ° j'`° °w ._�� ° D° E w° 9 0` 0 a ro 0 0 0 0 0. O U O. W ��yy N N N 2 L N O w ° PNi Q ' o>' a ?v °n �-°0oc oE.. 'ti rn �m D. mP v y na .rn S ou�p � J S 8 n g (p � ,, pp do \ Eon on ° c =. ° u ) ° >o W rn aIn o o0 6 N N 9 D 000 IOIU O O N' E ry m 0 o Ot t>P w O > N n N G 9 TO N M O O N l0 N n n n O O O ro q n E °' .O N 6 �. L C U 0 0 ro 0 C N (0 O',O w :E n� O N " o ro•«.� �i �'�ms oEro o°u o 2 L 'D� 2 W m m m 3 v$ ,� o ,°u .vc33 o a. E N 0 o a 0 E °0 vi m s"E m$o w 0 oNrn ' m "z; E : � av QQoo N'c n .-ci >� va°.° a.? i88 o �c «a 5'Om v ° cm D `zv m O cioi^6 °. 'EnTE T-2 d N.°'0 ?I=mp o o no�ac -v a v L'i a ° N a rnN 3.. 0 2 h v -.d c._ 3 ro o a - Q N ° c'« c .c PCi P Qp� o� 0 0 0 0 3 a: SEA o o o ND N� ° > u vja N -tli�K E 25 m E��m F- rnd (7J6' 43 t"�a t�w� ) � � W w N °) 8 FF- m=. - m. � �.c F - ° 'u bt a „ t�°i �i �n� � o'Iw E. I N N J E C CD O N N> v a.4 `w�E m( JO Gv $u U F - 0 • � v N w o Y ti E `° Y c c p C ? 0 M1 r U v c, N a 3 n E a w V N tIl Y N A >� �$ a W W O �° N o 6 +> C u C {� t O 0 H ro N N v a W c� a r.« P to o._ «0 w o y •FE0 w t� °. j > - °' :?C'O w�p F'Ew ZENO� >VLV-�� i ° °) v > O O Y) O rn N J c c:U 3 H V 3 c ti w:.a M a?- c m o N c O ro iu a •y V c � >' r F- cc ww`c ° w T -roY Z O w v ' s �°« W:a U.cEoa LL�imo TcF - �5c > « uJ. Yc du roa �.' W ,a.P� T $ zH u dN >TD w "'"` - F- c•o O a w oo.uV w " p�. � o o ... -H'c' N w o O m U �.vv Z m D s m y Fs w F - N. E:;= W ` U w' °3 ow 3 a:Nw- U) c - O > NO IP H N N • i%1 •_ t• U c O N J tro . w x O N O N N al C p O'U O. O° ?� NL0MAD .YN0 C.N'C ro ro > N •. C c a U O U N '� l] a' N ? 4 :_ r..0 N C. •�� �rn oEma_'. rn _ w,'a m. v.3.�..c v..}u.c 'v v o S P N E E 7., o N r. N S 4 �' C , 3 $j ? a .� ql m .� N= X ..:�j a ° 1 :'8 i N � : •O '� c o c E � «'n c y o'C ;v x E 0, 0 0 0 . �H a QZ Q„9 �� « ma w`� ° u 1 �.'o= a wU . June 10, 1980 Exhibit D Page 1 of 3 Mr. Dan Faust City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Re: Insurance Proposal Dear Dan, On behalf of the Insurance Committee I am making the recommendation that the City renews with the Home Insurance Company, with the Property and Casualty going into the Safety Program with the possible dividend because of good loss experience of the pool of cities. The Workers Compensation we feel that the Retro based on past experience is the best for the City, instead of Safety Program. There is a chance on a Retro that you could pay higher in any one year but experience shows that for the last few years you would have been better with the Retro. The following are the reasons we picked the combination of Safety and Retro with the Home. 1) The Home_has had an established plan in Minnesota before and has experience in it where the League is just getting started, June 1st on property. 2) We are dealing with Staff Adjusters instead of independents. 3) The Retro on Workers Compensation is the Cities experience not the industries and the City has an 807 modification showing good experience. 4) Home insures both the Property and Workers Compensation where the League has two completely separate plans. Page Two (2) Exhibit D Page 2 of 3 5) Home has a local office to deal with while the plan has a general agency. 6) The Home Safety Program with its dividends is set out and we know how any distribution will be made while the League has not determined how the dividends will be distributed. 7) Also, we feel the cost of the Home with the two plans should be a savings to the City. Very truly yours, �T ome H. Ekblad,CLU JHE:ms r &b EK13LAD, I'ARDEE & BEWLLL, INC. 2050 WHITE BEAR AVENUE ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55109 June 11, 1980 Mr. Dan Faust City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Re: Insurance Renewals Dear Dan, Exhibit D Page 3 of 3 INSURANCE /BONDS PHONE: (612) 777 -8381 The Home has two things included in their proposal that are not in the League proposal. 1) Builders Risk on the Fire Station. ✓6�� 2) The Ford Fairmont purchased May 16, 1980. 3 73 Also, remember that the deposit on a Retro is the Standard Premium not.the. Discounted Standard Premium. Very truly yours, J e H. $k ad E: ms voUM,�epeMenl Lauwunre Jnoerar I Ep { EKI3LAD, PAF2,DIJIP e 8z I INC. 1 2050 WHITE BEAR AVENUE ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 56709 June 16, 1980 Mr. Dan Faust City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Re: Insurance Bid 1980 Dear Dan, INSURANCE /BONDS PHONE: (61 777 -8381 As we talked last Friday regarding the City Receiving a revised bid from the League as to the Workers Compensation. I will give a comparison of the'two plans, but would also like to mention that both the League and Home were given two days to revise bids, without knowing the other bid, but the League didn't change until after they knew their position. The following is a comparison at different loss ratios. The difference in package with lower Liability limits is $58,645. less $52',555. is $6,090. The LMCIT 6% Workers Compensation discount will not have any effect except in money deposited as both Retros are figured off of Standard Premium. Standard Premium Basic Minimum Premium Maximum Premium Home $99,761. 26,137. 51,177. 115,822. League $99,761. 28,930. 28,930. 119,713. Examples Home formula: (Losses x Loss Conversion Factor a Basic) Tait Multiplier League Formula: Basic plus losses x 1.107 Vo up/��,gM,1M/ 6auN nre lnaerJr Page Two (2) Example 1 - No losses Home (0 x 1.125 + 26,137) x 1.11 _ $29,012.00 Minimum Premium $51,177.00 League $28,930. + 0 x 1.10 = $28,930.00 Example 2 - $10,000 losses Home ($10,000 x 1.125 + 26,137) 1:110 = $41,499.00 League $28,930 + (10,000 x 1.10) = $39,930.00 Example 3 - $20,000 losses Home ($20,000 x 1.125 + 26,137) 1.110 , $53,987.00 League $28,930. + (20,000 x 1.10) , $50,930.00 Example 4 - $30,000 losses Home ($30,000 x 1.125 + 26,137) 1.110 = $66,474.00 League $28,930 + (30,000 r. 1.10) = $61,930.00 Minimum Premium $51,177.00 You have to add the $6,090 League package difference to all League premiums. Very tru],y yours, J6rome �I "Ekblad M: m MA 13801 :\ \' li \1'1; \1.11'1,1; \ \'OO1), \II \XIiS(Yl \ 55109 OFFICE OF FINANCE 777 -813' May 20, 1980 Mr. Prank J. McGinley 2044 Prosperity Road Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. McGinley: The City Manager has requested that I respond to the four questions that you asked at the May 15th Council Meeting. it 1) How much legal advice and guidelines are furnished by the private auditors? The City normally seeks legal advice from the City Attorney rather than its private auditors. However, Section 2 of the audit contract (see attached Exhibit A) indicUes that the auditor's report shall disclose and make recom -- mendat'ions regarding the City's "non - conformity with policy and procedures prescribed by Council action, State Statutes, and /or Federal Rules and Regu- lations." Also, Chapter 6.67 of the State Statutes requires private auditors to report legal misconduct of City employees to the County Attorney and the State Auditor. 2) Are judgments on file in the Office of Municipal Court of Ramsey County with Court Administration? According to Kathy Snail of the Maplewood DiviEion of the Ramsey County Con ciliation Court, a permanent card file record all judgments is kept and E copy of the judgnent itself is kept on file for ten years at the Court's Maplewood Office. No record of the judgment is kept at the main courthouse in St. Paul. Judgments are legally enforceable for ten years. 3) Has any attempt been made to execute these judgments? On January 12, 1978, the City Council was presented with three alternative actions that can be taken after a judgment has been obtained (see attached Exhibit D). By unanimous vote, the Council selected the third alternative and requested staff to periodically present a list of charges determined to be uncolloctible. (Approximately 50% of the accounts referred to Conciliation Court are paid prior to the court hearing date.) 4) How does one write off a judgment? 'technically, the City does not write off judgments for uncollect:ible para•- me_dic bills. In Lead, the accounts receivable on the City's balance sheet: is reduced and a corresponding adjustment made in the allowance for estimated Mr. 1=r1nk J. McGinley _ 2 - May 20, 1980 uncollectible accounts This is illustrated by the following: Amounts Write Offs 12••31- -78 9- 20 --79 Paramedic Accounts Receivable Allowance for Esvimated Uncollectibles Net Amount $ 11,927 $ - 4,921 __J6 - 4,921 $ 5,016 Revised Amounts $ 7,006 _(1,990) $ 5,016 This procedure is in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles wherein uncollectible amounts are initially estimated based upon historical experience and then written off when positive evidence is obtained that the account will not be collected. As indicated earlier, the judgment is kept on file at the Ramsey County Conciliation Court Office. The write off of uncollectible accounts on the City's records does not affect the Court's records. However, if the City receives payment on a judgment, the Court is notified by the City that the judgment is satisfied. Sincerely, / I LP IGII Daniel F. Faust` Finance Director DFF:js Encl cc: City Manager City Council xry Pima 9tjr nenn.,7rzT3 a+»�r+ mnn at oml ... .. nn ... ,. r ........... ..... ..:.,.. ,, ,., .. e.:. .. :.,.._ ..;'aeu• AGREEMENT FOR AUDITING /ACCOUNI'PNG SERVICES, 0 0 This agreement by and between the CI'T'Y OFMAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA hereafter referred to as the "City ", and the aCCournting firm of DE LA HUNT VOTo & CO., LTD., hereinafter referred to as the "Auditors ", WITNESSETII: in consideration of their mutual covenants and agreements as hereinafter set forth, the partie> hereto contract and agree as follows: 1 . The Auditors agree to perform an audit of the financial statements and transactions of the.City for the year ended Dcccmber 31, 1979• Such audit and examination shall be made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the minimum audit procedures prescribed by the Minnesota State Auditor pur— suant to the provisions of M.S.A.,,Chapter 6. Such audit and examination will include tests of the accounting records and such other audit procedures as are considered necessary to enable the Auditors' to render an opinion on the fairness of the City's financial statements. It is not contemplated that the audit will be. a detailed examination of all transactions nor that the audit will necessarily discover mis— conduct, should any exist. The Auditors will, however, promptly 1iform the City of any findings which appear unusual or abnormal. 2. The Auditor's report and management comments shall be addressed to the City Council. Such management comments shall contain specific disclosure and recommendations with regards to the follaging. (a) Non with policy and procedures prescribed by Council Action, State Statutes, and /or federal Rules and Regulations. (b) Nonconformity to generally accepted governmental accounting principles. + ^fY/�;Y �':'y .v�{sr+- 'tp�' ". arnrsur c�.,�mf'eY ba;w�•.n; , as.�S:Sr etch 'emy±,�x^,;?�r vFn't"��;.�• a nr;�rv�ei nx nn rer{ .nem r, r+.q�j >Fg@�.i ,+�q,... (c) Defects in accounting policies and procedures ghat: make accounting ' ,and/6r auditing time consuming and /or inefficient. (d) Any failure of the accounting department to prepare and distribute financial reports required or needed for administrative purpose. (e) Any other information deemed appropriate of City Council consideration. A The 1979 Annual Financial Report of the City shall be prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and the "Minimum Reporting Requirements r City Financial Reporting" prepared and Issued by the office of the Minnesota State Auditor. Should the City require assistance in preparing and compiling its financial data and records to meet these requirements, the Auditors agree to assist the City as required and as determined jointly by the Auditors and City Administration. Fees for' such services (if required) shall be billed on the basis of the hourly rates contained herein, but shall be billed separate from audit fees. 4. If any circumstances disclosed by the audit and examination .call for a more detailed investigation than would be necessary under ordinary circumstances, such circumstances will be called to the attention of the City authorities before pro— ceeding further with such investigation. If authorized to proceed further with an investigation in this area, compensation for these additional services shall be at the regular rates designated later in this agreement. 5. The City herewith engages the Auditors for the work hereinbefore specified and agrees to pay the Auditors on the basis of; Partner $!i5.00 (a Hour Audit Supervisor /Manager $35.00 (a Hour Staff Auditors- Set) i or $25.00 (a liour Semi--Senior $20.00 (a Hour Junior $17.00 Hour Intern $15.00 (d I-lour Statistical typists and Report Processors $12.00 @ Hour Charge per Copy of Financial Statements $10.00 Copy 6. The Auditors shall provide the City with detailed statements as to the . classifications and hours worked. Payment of the Auditor's fees shall be made by the City within thirty days after submittal of an itemized claim correctly showing the amount due the Auditors. Claims for payment will be submitted for payment upon completion of, the. interim audit; upon canplet:ion of the final field work; and upon completion of the entire audit and submittal of the annual financial report and the auditor'-; comment's and recommendations. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Auditors have. e:xe:cutod this aJree. ment the clay and year written below. FA i DE LA HUNT VOTO F. CO., LTD, Certified public Accountants Itabert J. U to, Vice Date: CITY )F MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA �Uy " ;� % -. � � ( < Date: Mayor /".I i oI' I I, 1'1. 1 ve", I There ape three act.icrn;l t.hal: call he 'Col <en after a :'Judgment. h;Is been entered in the C'.i t:y':; favor: :L. 'PL) Vu the c1a:i.111 over to a coI1PcIion c1 ge11 cy wh:i.ch would charge 00% to 50% for each cl.a:i_H collected. North St. penal has u:;ect the Commerc:i.al. Service collection agency for about: 15 years and they Nava collected approximately 20% of the bills referred to them, 2. Attempt to find wages or bank accounts to levy 'the judgment against. Once - these are located, legal papers can be prepared and served by the Shcri.ff's Office to confiscate the asset: necessary to pay the claim. The fees involved in this process are added to 'the judgment and collected by the Sheriff's Office. Assets located outside the County are levied against throuc;h a referral method whereby the Ramsey County Sheriff transfers the papers - to the Sheriff of - the appropriate' county. ✓'� � 3. After receiving a judgment, discontinue collection _ attempts and write- -off: the account as being; un- IW' f col.lecti.ble. It. should be notcj that most amounts �p collected through the Conciliation Court process have been received prior to the scheduled court X hearing. Recommendation Staff has no recommendation and requests guidance from the Council.. MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager n FROM: Finance Director RE: Transfers to Close the 1977 and 1978 Diseased Tree Projects DATE: May 29, 1980 PROPOSAL It is proposed that transfers be made of the remaining cash balances in the 1977 and 1978 Diseased Tree Projects in order to close these construction accounts which are part of the Special Assessment Fund. BACKGROUND Both of these projects were completed in prior years but kept open pending an ad- justment of the State Aid amounts. The State Aid adjustments have now been made and the projects should be closed. As of April 30, 1980, the 1977 Diseased Tree Project had a surplus cash balance of $23,215. This surplus represents unused 1977 bond sale proceeds and should be trans - ferred to another project financed by the same bend issue. The most appropriate one is the County Ditch 17 project as additional costs are being incurred for special assessment appeals. The 1978 Diseased Tree Project had a surplus cash balance of $11,419 on April 30, 1980. This surplus represents-unused 1 bond sale projects and normally. would be transferred to.another project financed by the same bond issue. However, all other projects financed by the 1979 bond sale have been closed. Therefore, . the remaining surplus should be transferred to the sinking fund for the 1979 Bonds. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council: 1) Authorize a transfer to the County Ditch 17 project of the remaining surplus in the 1977 Diseased Tree project. 2) Authorize a transfer to the sinking fund for the 1979 Bonds of the remaining surplus in the 1978 Diseased Tree project. These recommendations are in accordance with the 1979 Audit report Action by Council: Rndoroed .r- modifi.ed_ Ro6ected Date— "s MEMORANDUM ' J TO: City Council i FROM: Barry R. Evans, City Manage 1 L- SUBJECT: Cable T.V. Committee DATE: May 30, 1980 You have approved a joint powers agreement with several other communities on the above subject. As a part of that agreement, you should appoint two persons to the joint committee. Citizens who have expressed an interest in being on a Cable T.V. Committee are: Al Closmore, Retired Corps of Engineers, 2485 Londin.Lane, Apt. 318 John Cheqwyn, Retired Court Reporter, 1631 E. Sextant Avenue ir- Rohricht, Attorney, 2125 Duluth 00 A ane Murdock, Travel Agent, 2082 E. Kenwood Drive Ann Fitch, Librarian, 162 Bellewood Avenue Acction by Counoll: Fndoxs cd_-. _..__.......- Modif i. cd_ .___.__._. )Re j ected..___..___. -_ !' MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Plan Amendment LOCATION: County Road D APPLICANT: L. K. Mahl and Associates, Inc. OWNERS: Lorraine Francis Becker Don, Rose, Richard, and Thelma Yurek Anna, Ed, and Helen Dorle DATE: May 28, 1980 Request The Applicant is requesting a Plan amendment from Rm, Residential medium density to LSC, Limited Service Commercial to construct a restaurant, motel, and office. Site Description 1. The site consists of three parcels, with a total area of 6.4'acres. 2. Existing land use: Three single - dwelling homes. Surrounding Land Uses 1. Northerly: Highway 694 2. Easterly: A drainage pond owned by the State 3. Southerly: County Road D. South of County Road D is a single dwelling house, the Learning Tree Day Care Center, and undeveloped land zoned F, Farm Residence and planned for LSC, Limited Service Commercial and RM, Residential Medium Density. 4. Westerly: A 33 foot wide,tax forfeit strip owned by the State. West of this strip is the Perkins Pancake House. Proposed Land Use 1. A restaurant, motel, and office. (See enclosed site plan). 2. A letter from the Applicant is enclosed. Past Actions 4/18/74: The site was annexed from the ,City of White Bear Lake. 8/1/74: The Land Use Plan was amended, designating the area from Ariel Street to the pond as Rm, the property west of Ariel Street as LSC; and the pond as OS, open space. The resulting Land Use Plan map does not reflect this motion. The Rm designation has been extended west of Ariel Street and the OS designation does not show. 10/3/74: Council tabled indefinitely a request to rezone'the site BC, Business Commercial, because of the lack of development. Planning Consideration 1. Existing Land Use Plan designation: Plan update for the immediate area. 2. Proposed Land Use Plan designation: Rm. There are no changes proposed in the LSC 3. If the site were developed to maximum density under the Rm designation, the site would hold 141 people. 4. Zoning: F, Farm Residence Environmental Consider There are no significant natural features on the site. Public Works Considera 1. Water and sanitary sewer are in the area and could be extended to the property. 2. County Road D is a rural section of road, without utilities or curb and gutter. The extension of utilities to this site would mai<e it advisable to upgrade County Road D to urban standards. This would produce assessments to benefiting property owners. 3. The only improvement planned for the County Road D - White Bear intersection is a traffic signal in 1983. The median had been temporarily closed, but was reopened after pressure by local businessmen. Construction of highway oriented uses, such as a restaurant or motel, would make it nearly impossible to close the median again. Public Safety Considerations Traffic control should be provided at County Road D and White Bear Avenue before any additional development is permitted in the area. itizen Commen A survey was sent to owners of the 13 properties within 350 feet of the site. Of the 7 who replied, none had objections to the Plan amendment. The following concerns were expressed with the specific project: 1. "My concern is what is going to happen to County Road D. I am already overburdened with assessments and surely the street can't handle the traffic which is sure to come from such a project." "The developer should assume the cost of these assessments." 2. Consideration should be given to closing the entry ramp to I -694 at White Bear Avenue and relocating it through the subject site. This would solve the traffic problem at County Road D and White Bear Avenue. This change was proposed to the Metropolitan Council and City of Maplewood in 1975. 2 Alternat 1. Approve the amendment 2. Deny the amendment 3. Approve an amendment to LSC for that portion of the site west of Ariel Street, as originally approved in 1974. Analysis The main issue is whether this property should be developed commercially or residentially. The main reasons for approving this amendment are related to the compatibility of land uses. Commercial development would be more compatible with the Perkins Restaurant and the noise from the.freeway. Also, half the property to the south is planned commercial and the pond to the east would be a natural barrier between commercial and residential development. The main reasons for denying the application are related to market demand. 6.4 acres of residential land would be lost that could house up to 141 people. The amendment may also lessen the demand for land already planned for commercial use in this area. Market demand should be considered in Plan amendment decisions. Because, however, of the uncertainties of market demand, the City should give first consideration to land use compatibility. Rec ommendation Approval of the amendment from Pon to LSC, on the basis that: 1. The land to the west and half the land south of the site is planned for LSC use 2. The Council approved an LSC designation in 1974 for that part of the site west of Ariel Street but it was not shown on the Land Use Map 3. The pond to the east makes a natural barrier between commercial and residential development 4. Commercial development is generally more compatible with freeway noise than residential development Enclosures Location Map Property Line Map /Land Use Plan Maplewood Heights Plan Applicant's Letter and Site Plan Action by Counoil: Endor.8ed__. - la Rea ected..___ — ._, D at o--- .._.... 3 I 13) BRE.NW000 y CURVE (4( E. HRF"mr. ne II.; ...1C l.N1YL 68 (2.1 CHIPPEWA CIRCLE (3.)CHIPPE.WA "E. NORTH ST. PAUL fl22W 36 I B I B S R21W V ( Q rzaR \ a I i I --_..-. 1 -- --- - Sys I j ON i a N M I I 140u. 3.56 a<., x m h Fl H� l o O " . pz o 03 x e 7.81 ar. 3810.¢. 1 m PETITIONER L. K. Mahal and Assoc. REQUEST Plan Amendment I Property Line Map and Current Land Use Plan ED Applicant's Site LO b4 cc CJ a) major collector M major arterial FU P-44 11 -J `�major arterial I as 0 Cf) U) C u CL) C\J QD rn Jx) LO b4 cc CJ a) major collector M major arterial FU P-44 11 -J `�major arterial I C:) Cu 0 Cf) U) C u CL) C\J QD rn 2-7 C� LL s.. - 0 V) < C:) Cu & ASSOCIATES, INC. May 5, 1980 Mr. Jeff Olson City Planner City of Maplewood 1902 E. County Rd. B Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: Request for Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan Dear Jeff: We are enclosing an application for amendment to the Comprehensive Plan on three parcels of property located north of County Road 1), east of Perkins, and south of I -694. The current property owners have made a thorough investigation of alternative uses for their property and find that the.proposed concept plan guideline of medium density residential is not compatible with present devel- opment opportunities for the property. They are therefore request- ing changing the Comprehensive Plan designation to LSC•- Limited Service Commercial for the property. They are submitting the following supportive justification to warrant the proposed Plan Amendment: 1) Since the property was originally designated medium residential, the property on the south side of County Road D and the west side of Aerial Street has been zoned. Limited Business Commercial and a Day Care Center constructed on the property. 2) The proposed planning designation of Limited Service Commercial would allow for a better buffering use be- tween I -694 and the remaining medium density residential property to the south of County Road D. .Because of the characteristics of the site, with a heavily traveled Interstate on the north side, a restaurant on the west side, a day care center on the south side, and a large highway department drainage pond to the east side, make it significantly more conducive to the Limited. Service Commercial designation than to a residential designa- tion. The impacts from the various surrounding pro- perty uses would provide an inappropriate setting for PROJECT DEVELOPERS L.K. Mahal &'Associates 6100 Green Valley Drive Bloomington, Minn. 55438 Telephone (612) 831 -3131 Mr. Jeff Olson May 5, 1980 Page 2 residential units. If residential units were con- structed on the property, it is very likely that these' impacts would prove a detriment to the residential pro- ject and thereby prove ultimately to be a detriment to the City. We feel that the more compatible uses such as a restaurant, motel, and office space would be very compatible with the surrounding environment, and pro- vide an excellent buffer between the Interstate and any residential that may be developed to the south of this property. It is also very likely that the construction of an office building.and motel on the property will have a very beneficial effect on the restaurants pro- perty immediately to the west of the site. 3) The Limited Service Commercial designation would also increase the taxable value of the property and thereby the tax base of the city. We feel that this designation is a logical extension of Limited Service Commercial designation presently abutting the west side of the pro- perty. 4) We feel that due to the fact that there is a minor arterial street (County Road D) on the south side of the property and a quite large water retention pond on the east side of the property, there will be more than adequate buffering between this property and residen- tial property to the east and south to assure no adverse affects. In fact, the inclusion of attractive Limited Service type uses on the property as a buffer between the Interstate and the residential property should have a very positive effect on the surrounding land uses. We would very much hope that the staff recommendation and Planning Commission recommendation support our requested Plan Amendment. If there are any further questions or additional information needed, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, L.K. MAHAL & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1� �G Terry Schneider I , I I I I , I I I I i I I I I I I I 1 I 1 ' I I I , I I • 1 i 1 I II I I � 1 I I I Ol / I I 1 I I m I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I I � I • � el I I I I �1 I o I .i I I I I I e I I I I I I I n I II E I I I II «I I I 1 I r I I 1 1 __..___•I- I.OIIOd__ i I + 2 - .v I S3° S SGA Z I i � on � • a _w &U pq { ,I , ` o e1 Y _ _ g I 0 I c 0 y M Y Q b I'I 1 o , P I rc S i o os z '0o0 3o�Zns MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, JUNE 2, 1980, 7:30 P.M. 1380 FROST AVENUE, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Axdahl called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. ROLL CALL Commissioner Lester Axdahl Present Commissioner Richard Barrett Present Commissioner Paul Ellefson Absent Commissioner Lorraine Fischer Present Commissioner William Howard Present Commissioner Edward Kishel Absent Commissioner Joseph Pellish Absent Commissioner Duane Prew Present Commissioner Ralph Sletten Present Commissioner David Whitcomb Present 3. APPROVAL OF MINU 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA (Chairman) Commissioner Howard Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - all. 5. PUBLIC HEARING A. Plan Amendment - County Road D (Mahal) Secretary Olson read the notice of public hearing. The applicant is requesting a Plan amendment from Rm, Residential Medium Density to LSC, Limited Service Commercial to construct a restaurant, motel and office building. Staff is recommending approval of the Plan amendment as out- lined in their report. Ken Mahal,, applicant, said he thought from their analysis this was the highest and best use of the property.. Chairman Axdahl said there was concern for access to the property if the configuration of the intersection of County Road D and White Bear Avenue would be changed. He asked what type of intersection would have to remain to have the project remain viable. 1 6 -2 -80 Mr. Mahal said his inquiries- at the State Highway Department lead them to believe there is no plans to change the intersection. He did not think they would have any problem with access. Commissioner Sletten asked how large the motel would be. Mr. Mahal said they were contemplating starting with about 105 to 120 units, possibly as high as 150 when complete. This is to be an economy type motel. They would like to see the office be about 30,000 square feet. He thought their proposal would reinforce the existing businesses in the area. Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment on the proposal. Bob Hajicek, one of the owners of the property directly south of the area in question, said he has no objection to the proposal and is in favor of the development as it would add to the area. There is a problem with access onto White Dear because of the existing traffic in the area. lie presented a copy of a plan prepared by Howard Dahlgren, Midwest Planning,about six years ago. This Plan was presented to the City and the Metropolitan Council. The proposal was for the signalization of County Road D. He thought this should be given consideration again. Don Tarpin, speaking for Mrs. Howitt who resides at 2170 E. County Road D, she has no objection to the rezoning of the property providing that she does not also have to pay for part of the charges that would be required for County Road D improvements. Les House, 2090 E. County Road D, said he would hate to have to pay for improvements to County Road D Chairman Axdahl closed the public hearing. Everette Dorle, 2091 E. County Road D, discussed with the Commission the history of the annexation of this property from White Bear Commissioner Howard said he thought the proposed amendment was logical. Commissioner Howard s that: 1. The land to the west and half the land south of the site is planned for LSC use. 2. The Council approved an LSC designation in 1974 for that portion of the site west of Ariel Street, but it was not shown on the Land Use Map 3. The pond to the east makes a natural barrier between commercial and residential development 4. Commercial development is generally more compatible with freeway noise than residential development. Commissioner Prew seconded " 2 6 -2 -80 Commissioner Barrett said he thought some comment should be made with regard to the traffic lighting on.White Bear Avenue.to provide a better flow of traffic. Commissioner Fischer suggested using a separate motion from the Plan amendment recommendation. Commissioner Whitcomb indicated he was concerned that the residents along County Road D would be assessed for any possible improvements to that roadway. Secretary Olson said no engineering studies have been made at this time to determine how extensive improvements may be. If the improvements would be assessed, it is generally done against abutting property owners. The assessment cannot exceed what is determined as the increased benefit to the property. Commissioner Whitcomb asked when the decision would be made as to whether County Road D would be upgraded Secretary Olson said that would probably be made at the point when the site plan is reviewed. The Commission could make a recommendation as part of the future rezoning Commissioner Prew said if the land use designation remained the same, and townhouses were constructed, the street improvements would be the same and costs would be assessed to the adjacent property owners. Voting: Ayes - all. 6. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 7. COMMUNICATIONS 8. NEW BUSINESS A. Commercial Revenue Note - K -Mart ``Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting preliminary approval of c&imer..cial revenue note financing in the amount of $.4..3 Staff is recommending_ of the request as outlined i "ri their report. Commissioner Howard if there outside of the building. contemplated to the Secretary Olson said it was his u`hderstanding there would be no expansion of the building. •�. Otto Byhre, representing K -Mart, said there is nb expansion of the store contemplated. They propose the acquisition and renovation of the existing facility. '* Commissioner Fischer said the number of jobs on the proposal is different from what has existed on the site. She questioned if the type of operation is changing. 3 6 -2 -80 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development DATE: June 19, 1980 SUBJECT: Expansion of Non- conforming Uses The Planning Commission made the following recommendation for amending Section 912.010(5): SECTION 912.010(5) NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS OR PREMISES. No existing building or premises devoted to a use not permitted in the district in which such building or premises is located shall be en- larged, reconstructed, or structurally altered, unless: a. required by law or government order, or b. there would not be a significant affect, as determined by the City through a special use permit, on the development of the parcel as zoned I concur with their recommendation. Y s MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Expansion of Nonconforming Uses DATE: June 9, 1980 Request Staff is requesting that Section 912.010 (5) of the City Code be amended to allow expansion of a nonconforming use under specified circumstances. Existing Code Section 912.010 (5) NONCONFORMING USES OF BUILDINGS: EXTENSION PROHIBITED. No existing building or premises devoted to a use not permitted in the district in which such building or premises is located, except when required by law or order shall be enlarged, extended, reconstructed, substituted or structurally altered unless the use thereof is changed to a use permitted in the district in which such building or premises is located, except as provided herein. Reasons for Chang 1. The intent of this code is to avoid improvements to nonconforming uses which would discourage future planned for development. The key issue is whether or not a particular improvement has the potential of discouraging future planned development. Not all improvements possess this potential. Thus, requests of this nature should be reviewed on a case by case basis. If the improvement will not significantly affect future development, through conversion or replacement, it should be considered for approval. 2. There are two options for expanding. nonconforming buildings under present Code: a. apply for a rezoning b. request that the subject use be designated as an allowable use within the district in which located. The use of a special use permit would be a preferred way of dealing with a request to expand a nonconforming use. That is, criteria are established by ordinance which must be met on a case by case basis, zones need not be changed, permitted uses within a district need not be expanded, and conditions can be attached, limiting expansion. Recommendation Amendment of Section 912.010 (5) of City Code as follows: SECTION 915.010 (5) NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS OR PREMISES. No existing building or premises devoted to a use not permitted in the district in which such building or premises is located shall be enlarged, reconstructed, or structurally altered, unless: a. required by law or government order b. There would not be a significant affect on the development of the parcel as zoned. Action by Conjxoi]:j Endorsed Nodlflod___ �_ R0 Jocted___.._ Date�`i�� l ° MEMORANDUM TO: City j Manager / � Action b; Council: FROM: Finance Director .0 �2t�ac RE: Write -Off of Uncollectible Paramedic Bills for 1979 Lndorsed_,_ DATE: May 28, 1980 h;od.if:iod___.._ PROPOSAL It is proposed that paramedic bills totaling $4,235.50 be written off as being un- collectible. BACKGROUND The following is a summary of the transactions for paramedic services provided in 1979: Service Charges billed $ 29,842 Conciliation Court fees on bills for 1979 375 $ 30,217 Service charges paid 25,816 Court fees paid 120 Hardship cancellations _ . 45 Uncollectible balance $ 4,236 The service charges paid represent 87% of the service charges billed. This represents a significant improvement over the 51% collection rate that the City had in 1975 and 1976 when accounts were only billed once. When the policy of sending second and third billings followed by court action was started early in 1977, all unpaid accounts for 1975 and 1976 were rebilled. The following is a listing of the collection rate by year after the new billing procedures were implemented: 1975 - 71% 1976 - 81% 1977 - 71% 1978 - 85% 1979 - 87% A total of 125 bills were filed in Conciliation Court for paramedic services provided in 1979. Of this number 75 bills were paid. (However, 35 of these failed to pay the Conciliation Court filing fee). The uncollectible amounts to be written off are itemized in Exhibits A and B. Exhibit A is a listing of bills unpaid after court action. Exhibit B is a listing of unpaid bills that have not been processed through court because of different reasons such as bankruptcy, death, moved without leaving a forwarding address, and unpaid balances of small amounts ($10 or less). Bills noted "not Ramsey Co." are uncollectible because only bills for Ramsey County residents can be processed through our local Conciliation Court. Bills for non - residents would have to be taken to the Conciliation Court within the County they reside, RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that $4,235.50 of .charges itemized on Exhibits A and B be written off as uncollectible. EXHIBIT A NAME & ADDRESS DATE OF RUN AMOUNT CASE N0, James Allen Burgess 3151 McKnight #209 St. Paul, MN 55110 1/3/79 38.00 144,848 Steven M. White 893 Laurel St. Paul, MN 55104 1/5/79 38.00 144,929 Mark S. Plan 851 Clear St. St. Paul, MN 55106 1/6/79 38.00 144,952 Laurence D. Hansen 5352 East St. White Bear Lake, MN 55110 1/11/79 3.00 145,132C Nancy L. Franks 131 Century 1202 St. Paul, MN 55119 1/22/79 3.00 145,551 Bruce E. Aherns 2470 Clarence Maplewood, MN 55109 1/26/79 38.00 145,694 , Donald Lavelle, Jr. 2032 Clark St. St. Paul, MN 55117 2/3/79 38.00 145,950 Jodi L. Athen 1325 Kohlman Maplewood, MN 55109 2/4/79 3.00 145,991 Dennis Englund 1787 Jackson Maplewood, MN 55117 FOR: Heidi Englund 2/9/79 3.00 146,170 Charles R. Kabitz 1509 Sandhurst Maplewood, MN 55109 FOR: Jessica Kabitz 2/22/79 3.00 146,623 Laverne A. Bogdan 1874 E. Shore Drive Maplewood, MN 55109 2/28/79 3.00 146,815 Roger Yeager 2357 Mailand Ct. Maplewood, MN 55119 FOR: Donna M. Yeager 2/28/79 3.00 146,819 Randy G. McAlpine 19].0 Ivy St. Paul, MN 5511.5 3/3/79 38.00 146,920 _ 2 EXHIBIT A Cheryl A. Taylor 2823 11azelwood Maplewood, MN 55109 3/3/79 38.00 146,964 Clarence J. Houle 1074 Bellecrest Maplewood, MN 55109 3/4/79 3.00 146,978 Eleanor A. Holmes 1742 Duluth Street Maplewood, MN 55109 3/6/79 3.00 147,038 Earl E. Pearson 81 E. Roselawn St. Paul, MN 55117 3/7/79 38.00 147,101 Armand Accari 762 Wells St, Paul, MN 55106 FOR: Michael A. Accari 3/29/79 38.00 147,866 Frank Carpenter 2607 No. Ariel Maplewood, MN 55109 FOR: Mark J. Denzer 3/30/79 3.00 147,912 Pearl R. Gatrell 2367 E. Larpenteur #207 Maplewood, MN 55109 4/13/79 38.00 148,515 Dave Koleber 1866 Myrtle Maplewood, MN 55109 FOR: Jessica Koleber 4/15/79 3.00 148,579 Rickie D. Morrison 2112 Manitou St. Paul, MN 55119 4/17/79 12.00 148,697 Russell Bauer - 500 Kingston Maplewood, MN 55117 FOR:" Randall J. Thote 4/21/79 3.00 148,827B Patrick J. Ryan 402 Charles St, Paul, MN 55103 4/29/79 3.00 149,174 Loraine Weatherbee 1710 Gurney Maplewood, MN 55117 4/30/79 48.00 149,210" William J. Rogers 2364 Dorland Place St. Paul, MN 55119 5/3/79 38.00 149,305 David M. Carroll 360 E. Cook St. Paul, MN 55101 6/7/79 38.00 Nancy L. Franks 131. N. Century #202 149,587 149,896 149,907 149,945 149,994 150,225 150,254 150,276 150,433 150,478 150,502 150,517 150,674 St. Paul, MN. 55119 6/8/79 38.00 150,765 _ 3 _ EXHIBIT A Judith A. Becker 1923 E. County Rd. B Maplewood, MN 55109 5/10/79 38.00 Harry C. Sass 2585 Conway #212 Maplewood, MN 55119 5/18/79 3.00 Patrick C. Rossbach 2570 Clarence Maplewood, MN 55109 5/18/79 3.00 Douglas C. Tague 444 Dorland Road Maplewood, MN 55109 5/19/79 38.00 Robert Kruger 2612 - 1st White Bear Lake, MN 55110 FOR: Jesica M. Kruger 5/20/79 13.00 Kenneth Heitz 2163 Hawthorne St. Paul, MN 55109 FOR: Gregory S. Heitz 5/26/79 3.00 Neil Hautala 1512 E. County Rd. B #310 Maplewood, MN 55109 5/27/79 3.00 David F. Schroeder 2358 Dorland Lane Maplewood, MN 55109 5/27/79 38.00 Jeffrey Goldonick 591 E. Hawthorne St. Paul, MN 55107 6/1/79 23.00 Linda M. Berthiaume 2275 N. Atlantic #307 Maplewood, MN 55109 6/2/79 3.00 Kenneth Hendricks 621 Humboldt St. Paul, MN 55107 6/3/79 38.00 Robin Graham 1854 Beebe Rd. Maplewood, MN 55109 FOR: Waymond Graham 6/3/79 38,00 David M. Carroll 360 E. Cook St. Paul, MN 55101 6/7/79 38.00 Nancy L. Franks 131. N. Century #202 149,587 149,896 149,907 149,945 149,994 150,225 150,254 150,276 150,433 150,478 150,502 150,517 150,674 St. Paul, MN. 55119 6/8/79 38.00 150,765 Paul Caldwell 2666 Hazelwood Maplewood, MN 55109 Daryl D. Bargo 865 No. Century St. Paul, MN 55119 Ava Baciak (FOR: Amanda L.) 1821 English #10 Maplewood, MN 55109 Carol A. Edge 311 Burlington Rd. St. Paul, MN 55119 Virginia S. Cook 915 E. Cottage St. Paul, MN 55106 Albert Galbrath 1770 Edward Maplewood, MN 55109 Charles A. McNeal 64 Woods St. Paul, MN 55107 Gene J. Lilledahl 203 Front St. St. Paul, MN 55117 Mary A. Rubink 2269 Buckingham New Brighton, MN 55112 John C. Newell 49 W. Maryland St. Paul, MN 55117 Gaylor Hoehne 420 Dorland Place Maplewood, MN 55119 FOR: Michael G. Hoehne Janet Wagner 2601 Harvester Maplewood, MN 55119 FOR: Roxanne M. Wagner Robert E. Ritland 1926 E. 4th Street St. Paul, MN 55106 Marveleteao C. Davis 2509 Hazelwood Maplewood, MN 55109 - 4 - 38.00 152,871 EXHIBIT A 3.00 152,879 6/8/79 48.00 150,771 6/11/79 38.00 150,914 6/13/79 38.00 151,002 6/20/79 48.00 151,328 6/22/79 48.00 151,398 6/23/79 3.00 151,472 7/4/79 3.00 152,087 7/7/79 38.00 152,264 7/10/79 3.00 152,354 7/12/79 38.00 152,487A 7/13/79 38.00 152,509 7/20/79 38.00 152,871 7/20/79 3.00 152,879 7/23/79 38.00 152,987 _ 5 _ EXHIBIT A Roy I. Walbridge 141 E.*Little Canada Rd. St. Paul, MN 55117 8/13/79 38.00 154,032 Mary Arndt 1685 E. Laurie Rd, Maplewood, MN 55109 FOR: Bruce G. Aldridge 8/16/79 3.00 154,149 Lorraine Weatherbee 1710 N. Gurney St. Paul, MN 55117 8/17/79 38.00 154,182 John H. Dukek 596 Portland St, Paul, MN 55102 8/22/79 38.00 154,405 David W.'Olson 2281 E. 11th Street No. St. Paul, MN 55109 FOR: Michael D. Olson 8/24/79 3.00 154,479 Marium D. Block 2091 Birmingham Maplewood, MN 55109 8/31/79 3.00 154,808 Wardell B. Madison 1727 Gurney Maplewood, MN 55117 9/2/79 3.00 154,930 Susan Urbanski 1232 Ross Avenue St. Paul, MN 55106 9/11/79 3.00 155,269 Pamela M. Tischler 1712 Beaumont Maplewood, MN .55109 9/16/79 38.00 155,483 Debramae Andreason 1084 E. Ivy Avenue St. Paul, MN 55106 9/17/79 3.00 155,545 Doreen A. Prenatt 615 Wales St. St. Paul, MN 55101 9/19/79 48.00 155,611 Cindy Clements 1724 County Rd. C Maplewood, MN 55109 10/5/79 38.00 156,304 Yvonne Bartusch 2367 E. Larpenteur #211 St. Paul, MN 55109 10/6/79 48.00 156,328 Wardell Chavoux 266 Fuller. St. Paul, MN 55103 10/9/79 38.00 156428A _ 6 _ EXHIBIT A Sally J. Mitzuk 1622 Goodview St. Paul, MN 55119 10/23/79 :,3.00 157,110 Dennis L. Anderson 2633 Division X64 No. St. Paul, MN 55109 10/27/79 38.00 157,245 Phyllis A. Vaughn 2725 White Bear Ave. Maplewood, MN 55109 10/28/79 48.00 157,323 Joseph Ramirez 1528 E. Cope Maplewood, MN 55109 10/28/79 38.00 157,350 Margaret Gerlach 1510 E. County Rd, B Maplewood, MN 55109 11/11/79 3.00 157,944 Donald E. Whiting 2521 E. 16th Avenue No. St. Paul, MN 55109 11/15/79 38.00 158,071 Carl G. Adamson 490 E. Skillman #203 Maplewood, MN 55109 11/24/79 38.00 158,434 Arthur L. Lundgren 1084 Bellecrest Maplewood, MN 55109 11/30/79 38.00 158,654 Thomas Lavelle 2610 Bittersweet Maplewood, MN 55109 FOR: Rory T. Lavelle 12/2/79 3.00 158,738 Thomas J. Nodeau 954 E. Cook St. Paul, MN 55106 12/06/79 3.00 158,867 Tegra 0. Bonner 410 S. McKnight Maplewood, MN 55119 12/7/79 48.00 158,928 Hortense E. Lee 1732 Lafond Avenue St. Paul, MN 55104 12/8/79 3.00 158,958 Donald L. Juehrs 1942 Polaris No. St. Paul, MN 55109 12/12/79 38.00 159,117 Mary Jane Eiden '875 E. Geranium St. Paul, MN 55106 12/15/79 25.50 159,226A _ 7 _ EXHIBIT A Virginia Hamline 2 Lake Avenue White Bear Lake, MN 55110 12/18/79 3.00 159,361 Edward W. Johnson 1199 County Rd. B Maplewood, MN 55109 12/20/79 38.00 159,419 Felix Gudio 768 Ellridge Maplewood, MN 55109 12/23/79 3.00 159,552 $2,006.50 35.00 144,952A 35.00 144,966 0.00 144,973 7.00 145,248 45.00 145,717 35.00 145,852 45.00 145,893 2.00 145,962 45.00 146,074 35.00 146,167 35.00 146,395 35.00 146,403 Ret'd. Mall Not Ramsey Co. Council Approved for Cancellation Under $10.00 Not Ramsey Co. Not Ramsey Co. Not Ramsey Co. Under $10.00 Council Approved for Cancellation No collection on previous court filings. Not Ramsey Co. No collection on previous court filings. *Not taken to conciliation court previous bills filed in court never paid David E. Moser EXHIBIT B 983 E. Maryland St. Paul, MN 55106 01/06/79 Joyce A. Strand 14508 St. Croix Trail N. Marine on St. Croix, MN 55047 01/06/79 Monroe MCNeilNs 2410 Bush St. Paul, MN 55119 01/06/79 Roberta S. Hackett 6315 Knox Ave. So. Richfield, MN 55423 01/14/79 Stephen Jungersen 6805 W. Essex Souix Falls, SO 57106 01/27/79 Sue Vivian East 16 Linden Landfall, MN 55119 01/31/79 Sherry L. Douglass 1820 Roosevelt #5 Racine, WI 53406 02/01/79 Sally Goode 2351 Mailand Ct. Maplewood, MN 5511.9 FOR: Donna M. Goode 02/03/79 Monroe M. McNeil 2410 Bush St. Paul', MN 55119 02/07/79 Dennis H. Rudeen* 1184 Frisbee Maplewood, MN 55109 02/09/79 Steven D. Kissling 1324 Tyler Street Hastings, MN 55033 02/15/79 Kenneth A. Rieck* 1528 Cope Maplewood, MN 55109 02/15/79 35.00 144,952A 35.00 144,966 0.00 144,973 7.00 145,248 45.00 145,717 35.00 145,852 45.00 145,893 2.00 145,962 45.00 146,074 35.00 146,167 35.00 146,395 35.00 146,403 Ret'd. Mall Not Ramsey Co. Council Approved for Cancellation Under $10.00 Not Ramsey Co. Not Ramsey Co. Not Ramsey Co. Under $10.00 Council Approved for Cancellation No collection on previous court filings. Not Ramsey Co. No collection on previous court filings. *Not taken to conciliation court previous bills filed in court never paid EXHIBIT 8 - 2. - Robert T. Pearson* ,{ / 1724 Howard //e No collection Maplewood, MN 55109 03/08/79 35.00 147,122 on previous court filings, Dennis H: Rudeen* 1184 Frisbee No collection Maplewood, MN 55109 03/10/79 35.00 147,227 on previous court filings. Dorothy M. Miller Rt. 2, Box 144 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 03/14/79 35,00 147,343 Not Ramsey Co. Robert.T, Pearson* 1724 Howard No collection Maplewood, MN 55109 03/15/79 35.00 147,365 on previous court filings, A. J. Barchardt 1481 E. Sherren Maplewood, MN 55109 03/15/79 9.00 147,393 Under $10,00 James Rousselle 1881 Furness, #208 Maplewood, MN 55109 03/21/79 45.00 147,621 Ret'd, mail. Lyndon J. Thoemke 1930 Burns St. Paul, MN 55109 03/30/79 35.00 147,921 Ret'd. mail, Wiehelmina Konig 1880 E. Shore Dr,, #411 Maplewood, MN 55109 04/01/79 35.00 148,014 Ret'd, Mail Theodore Guzman* 1528 E. Cope No collection Maplewood, MN 55109 04/10/79 35.00 148,408 on previous court filings. Kenneth A. Rieck* 1528 E. Cope No collection Maplewood, MN 55109 04/10/79 35.00 148,408A on previous court filings, Bonnie Mae Partin 319 E. Larpentereur #9 Maplewood, MN 55109 04/16/79 2,•00 148,615 Under $10.00 Carlotta Schultz 14850 - 62nd Street Stillwater, MN 55082 FOR: Allen R. Gresham 04/20/79 35.00 148,816 Not Ramsey Co. Patrick D. Hammes 6882 - 5th 'Street Oakdale, MN 55119 04/21/79 45.00 148,827A Not Ramsey Co. *Not taken to conciliation court -- previous bills filed in court never paid EXHIBIT B - 3 Kay Ann Lundstrom 1247 Century, #11 St. Paul, M,N 55119 FOR: Thomas R'. Lundstrom 05/03/79 35..00 149,328 Ret'd. Mail Michael K. Evans 1492 County Road B., #309B' Maplewood, MN 55109 01/13/79 30.00 145,206 Ret'd. Mail Marylin Haute 1512 County Rd. B, #301 Maplewood, MN 55109 FOR: Angela M. Brisson 06/17/79 35.00 151,215 Ret'd. Mail Jerry A. Woodstrom 373 Old Hwy. 8 - ,$303 New Brighton, MN 55112 06/30/79 45.00 151,912 Ret'd. Theodore R. Guzman* Thomas G. Chase No collection 1528 Cope 855 So. Century on previous Maplewood, MN 55109 05/24/79 35.00 150,144 court billings. Billy Thompson 151,918 Under $10.00 Rose V. Tardy 144 Arkwright St. Paul, MN 55101 06/01/79 35.00 150,430 Ret'd. Mail Dennis II. Rudeen* Maplewood, MN 55119 06/03/79 35.00 No collection 1184 Frisbee _ Mail Rosemary Ellen Wasson on previous Maplewood, MN 55109 06/03/79 35.00 150,585 court filings. David N. Ehrreich St. Paul, MN 55101 Little Circle Drive, Lot 11 35.00 151,477 Ret'd. Mail St. Paul, MN 55117 06/10/79 45.00 150,862 Ret'd. Mail Kenneth A. Rieck* ✓ No collection 1528 Cope on previous Maplewood, MN 55109 06/13/79 35.00 151,000 court filings. Marylin Haute 1512 County Rd. B, #301 Maplewood, MN 55109 FOR: Angela M. Brisson 06/17/79 35.00 151,215 Ret'd. Mail Jerry A. Woodstrom 373 Old Hwy. 8 - ,$303 New Brighton, MN 55112 06/30/79 45.00 151,912 Ret'd. Mail Thomas G. Chase 855 So. Century Maplewood, MN 55119 06/30/79 .2.00 151,918 Under $10.00 Rose V. Tardy 2363 Mailand Ct Maplewood, MN 55119 06/03/79 35.00 150,529 Ret'd. Mail Rosemary Ellen Wasson 660'DeSoto St. Paul, MN 55101 06/23/79 35.00 151,477 Ret'd. Mail *Not taken to conciliation court -- previous bills filed in court never paid. EXHIBIT B - 4 Les Vanderhof 126 Dellwood Square S. Landfall, MN 55119 FOR: Richard A. Vanderhof 07/02/79 35.00 151,985 Not Ramsey Co. David A. Duncan 488 So. Hindricks Greenwood, IN 56142 07/11/79 45.00 152,430 Not Ramsey Co. Leroy C. Myhre 731 - 16th Ave. NE Blaine, MN. 07/17/79 45.00 152,727 Ret'd. Mail Dawn R. Bach 7430 W. 128th St., #201 Apple Valley, MN 551.24 07/19/79 20.00 152,820 Not Ramsey Co. Thomas A. Cole 6040 - 40th St., No., #109 Ret'd. Mail Oakdale, MN 55109 07/19/79 35.00 152,858 Not Ramsey Co. Jody Kay Quinn 2075 Hwy. 36, #105 No. St. Paul, MN 55109 07/22/79 35.00 152,930 Ret'd. Mail Thomas J. Nicholson 6071 Harris Stillwater., MN 55082 08/16/79 45.00 154,170 Not Ramsey Co. Paul F. English 5 Park Square Ave. Not Ramsey Co. Providence, RI 08/24/79 35.00 154,519 Ret'd Mail Ronald R. Lozinski 119 Western St. Paul, MN 55102 09/06/79 35.00 155,080 Ret'd. Mai]. Michael Weisser 1443 Palace St. Paul, MN 55105 09/08/79 35.00 155,153 Ret'd. Mail George A. Tooze 321 Larpenteur, #217 Maplewood, MN 55117 09/12/79 35.00 155,302 Ret'd. Mail Patricia J. Barton 6908 - 10th St., #208 Oakdale, MN 55119 09/15/79 35.00 155,456 Not Ramsey Co. Rebecca L. Devine 128 Dellwood Sq. Landfall, MN 55119 09/15/79 35.00 155,461 Not Ramsey Co. EXHIBIT B - 5 - Thomas Bielke 6851 - 11th St. No. Oakdale, MN 55119 FOR: Michael T. Bielke 09/18/79 35.00 155,598 Not Ramsey Co. William Labold 1724 E. County Rd. C Maplewood, MN 55109 FOR: Shawn A. Lund 09/24/79 7.00 155,833 Under $10.00 Gregory M. Payne 3412 Downers Drive Roseville, MN 09/28/79 45.00 155,987 Ret'd. Mail Lila F. Otunuku 3913 Granada Way Oakdale, MN 55109 09/29/79 35.00 156,022 Not Ramsey Co. . C. Bjonfald 929 Mahtomedi Mahtomedi, MN 55115 09/29/79 35.00 156,043 Not Ramsey Co. Jeffrey J. Thompson 844 Hall Street St. Paul, MN 55107 09/29/79 45.00 136,054 Ret'd. Mail Herbert E. Copeland 127 E. 14th Street Minneapolis, MN 55403 10/08/79 35.00 156,428 Not Ramsey Co. Daniel Hagele 2328 - 11th Ave., #10 No. St. Paul, MN 55109 10/13/79 5.00 156,668 Ret'd. Mail Edward J. Droves 180 Grenadier Oakdale, MN 55119 10/17/79 35.00 156,845 Ret'd. Mail Shelly C. Petrillo 2220 Pillsbury, #106 Minneapolis, MN. 55404 11/20/79 45.00 158,313 Not Ramsey Co. Leland Demo 8709 Demontreville Rd. Lake Elmo, MN 55042 FOR: Tracy Jo Demo 11/20/79 35.00 158,339 Not Ramsey Co. John H. Galvin 1600 Eddy St. Hastings, MN 55033 11/27/79 35.00 158,553 Not Ramsey Co. Tammy J. Martinson 1060 Greenbrier St. Paul, MN 55106 12/2/79 35.00 158,741 Ret'd. Mail EXHIBIT 6 _ 6 _ Sonya H. Owens 1028 - 7th St.. Hudson, WI 54016 12/19/79 35.00 159,372 Not Ramsey Co. Robert E. Bertini 2953 Granada Lane Oakdale, MN 55119 12/28/79 35.00 159,718 Not Ramsey Co. Brett Terrell 939 W. Anderson St. Stillwater, MN 55082 12/27/79 45.00 159,691A Not Ramsey Co. $2,229.00 J xL l MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager /► FROM: Director of Public Works ),Ah DATE: June 12, 1980 SUBJECT: T.H. 61 Frontage Road - Gervais Avenue to C.T. "C" In July of 1979, the Council ordered the construction of English Street south of County Road "C ". During the develop- ment of this project consideration was given to the location of a future T.H. 61 frontage road as shown on the attached map. Since that time, the Minnesota Department of Transportation has received a request for access from a property owner in the southeast quadrant of the intersection-of C.T. "C" and T.H. 61. The State has acquired the access to T.H. 61 from these properties. However; they are being advised by legal counsel that unless some alternative access is available they may have to allow direct access to T.H. 61 on a temporary basis. Therefore, the construction of a frontage road has been given high pr:iority by District 9. Representatives of MnDOT have indicated there may be State cooperative agreement funds available to construct the roadway in 1981 or 1982. Cooperative agreement funds are provided for the construction cost of a standard frontage road. The City would carry out the project, provide all engineering and administration, be responsible for the maintenance of the facility, and pay for additional construction cost beyond those of a standard frontage road; utilities, extra street width, sidewalks, etc. All funding details would be worked out prior to the City making any commitment to proceed. The City currently anticipates the construction of a remote frontage road in this area. Remote frontage roads provide access to private properties on both sides. These are generally con - sidered local streets and not funded or maintained by MnDOT. This appears to be an opportunity to construct this roadway using State funds at a very reasonable cost to abutting property owners. It is therefore recommended that the City cooperative agreement funds to construct'a from Gervais Ave. to C.T. "C request MnDOT for T.H. 61 frontage road Action by Council: [1) 1 , JU N 1 = 500 (D COUNTY RD. ° C of GERMS _, -- T. H. 36 5II o � F z W � UJ GERMS _, -- T. H. 36 tl" j T0: City Manager FROM: Director of Public works SUBJECT: Diseased Shade Tree Program, Project 79 -6 Assessment Roll DATE: June 12, 1980 It is recommended the Council order the preparation of the assessment roll for this project and establish a public hearing for July 31, 1980. It is recommended the roll be prepared as follows: % of total removal cost Trees removed on private property 50% Trees removed on boulevards 40% Grant ineligible properties (income) 100% The attached provides a comparison of the proposed assessment with that of the previous two years. The City has received. 44% of total project cost in State Aid (50% of eligible cost). This percentage is considerably higher than in previous years. The proposal calls for less direct City subsidy of the assess- ments. Action by Council: Endorsed - Modiaied__:,_,__ Rejected_ D at e _..,_.,.__,_,...._,_ "s June 12, 1980 COMPARISON OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT WITH THAT OF PREVIOUS TWO YEARS A of Total Removal Cost Paid by Property Owner 1979 PROJECT 1978 1977 Private Property 50% - Boulevard 40% (Income) 100% 52.2% 50 % 100 % _ PROPOSED PROJECT PROJECT TOTAL PROJECT COST 70,576 .116,740 207,486 State Aid Revenues 31,109 33,066 53,817 Assessment Revenues 33,230 (2) 65,380 128,723 City Costs Total (1) 6237 (2) 18,294 26,946 70,57, 1 - 7 - 4 209,486 A of Total Removal Cost Paid by Property Owner Tree Removed on Tree Removed on Inelligible Tree Private Property 50% - Boulevard 40% (Income) 100% 52.2% 50 % 100 % 43.5% 43.5% 100 % Removal Cost for Average Tree (18" on Private Property) Total Removal Cost 166.79 131.41 93.63 Cost Paid by Property Owners 83.39 68.80. 40.72 (1) Includes cost of tree removal on 'city owned property (2) Estimate 1 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager n _. FROM: Director of Public Works , ll/ /,�y DATE: June 12, 1980 A % SUBJECT: Final Plans, East Shore Drive Water Improvements Project 78 -9 Attached are the final plans and specifications for the construction of watermain on Frost Avenue from English Street to the Frost Avenue connection and on East Shore Drive westerly from Adele Street. This construction represents only a portion of the total project. Ramsey County in coop - eration with the City will also be letting a contract for the construction of the Frost Avenue . connection including street; curb and gutter, storm sewer, and watermain. Approval of final plans and specifications and authorization to advertise for bids is recommended. .. o N;� Covx�t:_ ;ywet�n r� I. f'" V MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Public Works DATE: June 12, 1980 WY SUBJECT: Final Plans, Condor Storm Sewer Project 78 -18 Attached ate the final plans and specifications for the construction of a storm sewer from Londin Lane to the "Arnie Johnson Pond" prepared by Short, Elliott and Hendricks, Inc. Approval of the final plans and specifications and authori- zation to advertise for bids is recommended. A( by Counoil:1 E ''ndorsed_..._ _ RejeoGed.. -