Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980 05-01 City Council Packetr AGENDA Maplewood. City Counci 7 .30 P.M. , i hursday, May. l , 1980 'Auni ci pa1 Admi Building Meeting 80:- 12 e (A) CALL JO O RDE R (B } R OLL CALF. (C) APPROV OF MINUTES 1. Minutes 80--8 (March 20) 2. Minutes 80-9 (April 3) ( D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA (E) C ONSEN T AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one .motion in the .form listed below, There will be no separate discussion on these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the �,onsent Agenda and w i l l be considered sepa:^ately. 11 Accounts Payable 2. Paramedic Bill: Application for Cancellation 3. URA Annual Report Time Extension: Clausen Addition 5 Request: Utilize- a City Vehicle to Attend Competitive Pistol Shoot-: (F PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Gall AVE nue and Lakewood Drive (Pro j ect 79--10 & 79-11) (7:30 p.m.) 2. Adele, Fenton, Walter Street Improvements (Project 79 -7) (7:45) M 30 Board of Appeal & .Ad j u ; tments : a. Minutes b. Variance: I- -494, west of Ce-ntury Avenue (8:00 p.m..) 4. Vari ance : Ripley Avenue (8:15) �. 5. Variance: Adele and Fenton 6 Street and Al ; e,y Vacati on : C'� a i re Street, Pfarr (8:30) �. (G) AWARD O F _BIDS 10 PoI i ce Computer (H UNF INIS ED.�BU 11 Cable T.V. 20 Hillcrest Development Project Financing 36' -Maple Greens Final Plat 4. Code Amendment: Accessory Building Setbacks 5. Travel and Training �. I) VISITOR P€ ESEN)ti ATION N EW BUSINESS l .. H RA App i n tmen t --- for Four-Way Stop Sign: w Let and- Rd e & Atlanti St. 2. Request (K} GC)UN PRF.SENI r MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:30 P.M., Thursday, March 20, 1980 Council Chambers,, lu.nic ipal Building Meeting No. 80.8 A. CALL TO O RDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7:30 P *M. by Mayor Greavu. J B* ROLL C ALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilman Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilman Present Frances L. Juker, Council.person Present Earl L. Nelson, Cou:- aci.lman Present C . APPROVAL OF MINUTES Z. Minutes No. 80 -5 (February 28, 1980) i Councilm.a.n Anderson moved that the Minutes of Mee ting - No. 805 (February 28, 1980) be ap proved as subm itted, Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all 2. Minutes No. 80- (March 6, 1980) Mayor Greavu moved that the Minutes of Meeting No. 80 -6 (March b 1980) be app roved. as submitted. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. D. APPROVAL OF A GENDA Mayor Greavu moved to a pprove the Agenda as amended: 1. Open Meetings 2. Ordinance or Policy -- Sewer Only - Health Emergency 3. County Road B - Sandhurst and Germain 4. McKnight Road 5. Letter Archdiocese- 120 and Lard }enteur h. Out of State Travel 7. Request for State Audit 8. Joint Fire Chiefs Regttes t - . Insurance Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes all. E. CO NSENT AGENDA l- 3/20 rl Councilman Anderson moved to remove Item I from the consent a to become Item J-5o' Seconded b Councilman Nelson. A all. Councilman Anderson. moved, seconded b Councilman Nelson, A all, to approve the Consent -A Items 2 throw L h 5 as recommended. 2,- Bud Transfe for 1980 Contracts with Local 2725 Approved the transfer of $86,095 from the contin account to -finance the 1.980 contracts with the .AFSCME Clerical-Technical and Maintenance personnel. 3. Res6lution: Abatement of Taxes for Cit Propert Resolution No. 80-3-65 . RESOLUTION re cancellation and removal from taxation records in the office of the Director of Propert Taxation, Ramse Count Minnesota, the assess- ments levied and identified b Ramse Count Code, Years Levied, and amount of tax to be cancelled as follows: Ramse Count Code 57 01110 010 39 Do Do Do Do Do 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 Assessment To Be Cancel.l,,,-- (Water 7016-V!184) 8950 883.38 856,02 828*66 801*30 773o94 TOTAL $5,039*14 WHEREAS, in Sep-1--ember, 1970, the Villa of North St. Paul started condemnation proceedin a "Unplatted Lands", bein Subject to White Bear Avenue, and German Street, part S 165 feet of NW` 1/4 of SE 1/4 of NW 1/4 E of centerline of White Bear Avenue, in Section 11, Township 29, Ran 22". This propert was to be used for llth Avenue from McKni Road to White Bear Avenue, and would run throu part of North St. Paul and part of Maplewood. On Jul 13, 1971, the Court appointed Commissioners who made their award a the above stated propert Cit took p at that time, Affected owners throu their attorne acknowled settlement of the Condem- nation . . Notice of Lis Pendens was filed, but a -Final Certificate in Condemnation was not fil until Jul 1979. NOTE: The above information was recited in appli-.. cation to abate & cancel real estate ta for y ears of 1972 throu 1978, b Seldon H. Caswell., Cit Attorne for North St. Paul, Minnesota, dated Jul 9, 1979, Propert Identification #57 0.1110 010 39, as propert is and has been used for a Cit Street® NOW,, THEREFORE, B IT RESOLVED, b the Cit Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the assessments Identified b the above numbered Code 57-01.110 010 39, y ears of 1-972 throu 1977, inclu in the total amount of $5,,.039,14, be cancelled and removed from taxation records of the Director of Taxation., Ramse Count Minnesota, 4. Resolution: Propert Divisions as Division No. 55560 Year Levied (Asse ssment Year) 0� 2 - 3/20 Resolution No. 80-3-66 ..WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 63-,8-149,.77-9-188 and 77-9-187 of the Cit Council of Maplewood, adopted Au 22, 1963, September 15, 1977 and September 1.5., 1977, the special. assessments for the construction of Sanitar Sewer 6-1, Sanitar Sewer and Water Improvement 73-13, Storm Sewer Curb and Gutter,, Street Improvement 73-13, were levied a the attached list of described properties said list made a part. herein and WHEREAS, the above mentioned properties have been conve and are d e scribed accordin to the attached list, said list made a part herein NOW,, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD., MINNESOTA. that the assessments for Sanitar Sewer 6-1, Sanitar *Sewer and Water Improvement 73-13, Storm Sewer, Curb sand Gutter,, Street Improvement 73-13, a the heretofore mentioned properties be correctl certified to the Auditor of Ramse Count in the amounts stated on. the attached list said list made a part herein. b. Division No. 55538* Resolution No. 80-3-67 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 76-8-155 of the Cit Council of Maplewood, adopted Au 19, 1976, the special assessments for the construction - of Diseased Trees No. 75-6 were 'levied a the attached list of described properties said list made a part herein and WHEREAS, the above mentioned properties have been conve and are described accordin to the attached list, said list made a part herein NOW!, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL' OF MAPLEWOOD., MINNESOTA, that the assessments for Diseased Trees Not 75-6 a the heretofore menti-o-n-e-d---prop-er- ties be correctl certified to the Auditor of Ramse Count in the amounts stated on the attached list said list made a part herein. C,, Division No. 55561 Resolution No. 80-3-68 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 75-7-143, 76-8-155 and 77-7-124 of the Cit Council of Maplewood, adopted Jul 31, 1975, Au 19, 1976 and Jul 26, 1977, the special assessments for the construction of Water Improvement 6921, Diseased Trees No. 75-6 and Tree Removal No. 76•6 were levied a the attached list of described proper- ties said list mace a part herein and WHEREAS, the.abo mentioned properties have been conve and are described accordin to the attached list, said li ma-de a part herein NOW, THEREFORE,, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,, MINNESOTA, that the assessments for Water Improvement 6921, Diseased Trees Nom 75-6 and Tree Removal No.-76-6 a the heretofore mentioned properties be correctl certified to the Auditor of Ramse Count in the amounts stated on the attached list said list made a part herein. "" 3 - 3/20 d. Division No. 54675 Resolution No. 80-3-69 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution. 78-8-174 of the Cit Council of Maplewood, adopted Au 22 1.978.., the special assessments f the construction of Water Improvement 75-16 were levied a the attached list of described properties said list made a part herein and WHEREAS, the above mentioned properties have been conve and are described accordin to the attached list, said list made -a part herein NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,, MINNESOTA,, that the assessments for Water Improvement 75-16 a the heretofore mentioned proper- ties be correctl certified to the Auditor of Ramse Count in the amounts stated on the attached list said list made a part herein.. e.- Division No. 55244 Resolution No. 80-3-70 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 68-9-178, 74-8-180 and 78-8-174 of the Cit Council of Maplewood, adopted September 23, 1968 Au 19, 1974 and Au 22,, 1978, the special assessments for the construction.of Sanitar Sewer No. 7, Water Improvement 73-1 and Water Improvement 75-16 werC.- levied a the attached list of described properties said list made a part herein and WH the above mentioned properties have been conve and are described accordin to the attached list, said list made a part herein .NOW., THEREFORE,, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF,MAYLEWOOD., MINNESOTA, that the assessments for Sanitar Sewe No. 7, Water Improvement 73-1 and Water Improve- ment .75-16 a the heretofore mentioned properties. be correctl certified to the Auditor of Ramse Count in the amounts stated on the attached list said list made a part herein. 5. Time Extension - Linwood Heights Approved a 90 da time extension for the Linwood Hei preliminar plat. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS S pecial Use Permit - 1199 Riple Avenue - 7:30 P.M. a. Ma Greavu convened the meetin for a public .hearin re a re from Mr.. Kenneth Schroeder, 1199 Riple Avenue, to reconstruct a sin famil dwellin on a substandard sized - 1-ot--,-----T-he---G-le-rk--s-tated----+L.-he --hearfin -no-tkce --was in order and noted the dates of publication.® b. Mana Evans presented the staff report with the following recommendations: 4 3/20 I g ecial Use Permit to replace one � nonconfor ITI Ii -i X. Approval of the re Sp i findings: use with another, based upon the follo n A 0 in 1. The proposed dwelling is c onsis . tent with the Land Use Plan and Zonin District desi f or the area. 2. Demolition Of the existing and substandard structure is consistent with proposed Cit Housing Policy- n meetin setback re would be 3. The proposed structure, 1 more restrictive than the existing structure. fy':.. ,, services at The new structure would be usin presently available no additional cost to the City, while g enerating propert taxes • than the existing structure* 5. The new structure would visuall enhance the existing nei 6. Nei density would not be affected. 7. The percentage of lot covera would be similar to that of other homes in the nei on similar size lots. Per is contin upon the applicant maintain • Approval of the Special Use in fou . r feet between the drivewa and west propert line for snow . storage. that the City c ouncil initiate the vacation of the u-a- II. Staff recommends -of-wa to the north of the subject propert based developed alley ri upon the folloIng findin w The alle ri does not serve a public purpose. 2. Vacation would increase the area of the applicant's substandard lot. Vacation of the alley ri is sub to the retention of a utility • ease , centered on the existing alle ri .C. chairman Les xdahl presented the foll owin g Planning C ommission recommendation: A " Fischer moved t hat the Planning Commission recommend that the City e one nonconforming Council approve the re special use permit to replac use with another, based upon the followin findings: 1. The propose . d dwelling is consistent- with the Land Use Plan and Zoning District desi for the areas 2. Demolition of the existing and substandard structure is consistent with proposed City Housin Policy- • would be more 3. The proposed structure, in meeting all s etback re restrictive than the exis ting structure. 4, The new structure would, be usin presently available City services at no additional cost to the City while g enerating hi property taxes than the existing structure* am 5 3/20 50 The new structure would visuall enhance the existin nei 6. Nei densit would not be affected, 7. The percenta of lot covera wo be similar to that of other homes in the nei on similar size lots. Approval of the Special Use Permit is contin,*-Yent upon the applicant maintainin four feet between the drivewa and west property line for snow stora .Commissioner Kishel seconded. A all. d. -Mr.' Ken Schroeder, 1199 Riple Avenue, the applicant, spoke on behalf of the - proposal. e. Ma Greavu called for proponents. None were heard, f. Ma Greavu called for opponents. None were heard, g . Ma Greavu closed the public hearin h. Councilman Nelson introduced the followin resolution and moved its adoption ®. 80 - 3 - 71 WHEREAS, a petition was .filed with the Cit of Maplewood as provided under Section 915.010 of the Municipal Code of the - Cit of Maplewood, said petition havin been si b more than 50% of the owners of propert within 200 feet of the propert described as follows.- Lot 16, Block 2., W.H. Fishers Addition to Gladstone 1199 Riple Avenue which has been proposed for Special Use,Peri-iiit. WHEREAS, a public hearin was held on March 20, 1980, at 7:30 P.M. in , 1 --he Cit Hall, notice thereof havin been dul published in the official Cit news- paper, .and notices of said hearin havin been mailed to. all propert owners of record within 200 feet of the area proposed J_-or special use permit to reconstruct - a sin famil dwellin on a substandard s i r ed lot and WHEREAS, the Cit Plannin Commission has made its recommendations and WHEREAS, it appears for the best intere I, of. the public that said petition be g ranted ; NOW, THEREFORE,, BE IT RESOLVED BY. THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the petition for the above. d..escribed Special Use Permit to reconstruct a sin famil dwellin on a substandard sizec-1 lot be g ranted, sub to all conditions contained in the staff and Plannin Commission reports, Seconded. b Councilman Anderson-, A - all. i. Councilman Nelson moved to initiate a publl.c hearin re the east-west al, e in Block 2., W.H. Fishers Addition to Glad-stone. Seconded b Counci-IT-rian Anderson. A all. 6 3/20 2. Special Use Permit Mobile Trailer 3M 7045 P.M. a,, Mana Evans stated 3M had re this item be withdrawn from the a b. Ma Greavu moved to withdraw Item F-2 from the a Seconded b Councilman Nelson. A - all. Go AWARD OF BIDS le. Police Computer - Software a. Mana Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilman Bastian introduced the followin resolution and moved its aelo- n: 80 - 3 - 72 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the b.J.d of Minnesota Crime Prevention Center in the amount of $8 annuall for C-1. period of three y ears is the lowest responsible bid for the purchase of an Automated Police De*cision Support Software Pa,--,-ka and the Ma and Clerk are hereb authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the Cit Seconded b Councilman Anderson. A - all. H. UNF-INISHED BUSINESS 1. Q uad Desi Ordi-, star ce - Second Readin a. Mana Evans presented the staff report. b.. Ma Greavu moved to den the a. pr oval of the Q uad Desi Ordinance in an effort to hold down buildin costs within the Cit of Maplewood. Seconded b Councilman Anderson. A - all. 2. Traffic Control Ordinance - Second Readin a,, Mana Evans presented the staff report.' b.- Councilman Bastian introduced the follo inance and moved its ord adoption_ ORDINANCE NO. 484 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1209 OF THE MAPLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE The Council of the Cit of Maplewood Does Hereb Ordain as Follows: Section 1. The Maplewood Code is hereb amended b addin a new section as follows: do" 7 - 3/20 No person shall' 1209,020. Interference with Traffic Control Davicese without lawful authorization of the P irector of Public Safet or act control, alter, deface,. injure, his desi attempt to or in f h the operation of an official knock down, .remove or interfere with optic0in. devices or an railroad traffic control device, i si or signa 1 1 or an inscriptionjo shi or .insignia t hereon, or . ereon, an part thereof hall take effect from and after its passa Section 2 This ordinance s and publication.. Seconded by Council person Joker. t�y�5 �' `�-��` F. PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) Commercial Revenue Na te: Mini Self-Storage 8:15 P.M. 4 0 g re the issuance a. Ma Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing ance of industrial development revenue bonds to finance a pro that wi'l.cOnsls t of ac Of three acres of land and the construction of a concrete block containi 60,.000 s feet for approximately 500 self stora b a y s building co The Clerk stated the hearin notice was to be located at 1195 E. Hi 36 . tion. the dates of pi-i.blica f ound to be in order and noted b. Mana Evans presented the staff report. followin Planning Commission re commendatio n: ce Chairman Lec Axdahl presented th recommend that the City " Fischer moved that the Planning Co mmission that the pro meets all of the • Council approve the application on the basis cr-iteria outlineA b the Council- Co mmissioner Howard abstaineds" C ommissioner Kishel seconded. A - 6. d. Ma Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e . . Ma Greavu called for opponentsis - None were heard* foll owing resolution and moved its adoption f, Ma Greavi.-i introduced th e 80 - 3 RESOLUTION RECITING A PR OPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT C.. IV PRELIMINARY APPR OVAL TO THE PROJECT PURSUXNT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF SAID PROJECT TO THE COMM ISSIONER OF SECURITIES OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH SAID PROJECT Iff4m 3/20 WHEREAS . . (a) The purpose of Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes., kn as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (the "A,ct") as found and determined b the le is to promote the. welfare of the state b the active attraction and. encoura and development of economicall sound industr and commerce to pre- vent-so fax as possible the emer of bli and mar and areas of chronic unemplo (b) Fhctors necessitatin the active promotion -and development of econom- icall sound industr and commerce are the increasin concentration of population in the metropolitan areas and the rapidl risin increase in the amount and cost of g overnmental. services re to meet the needs of the increased population and the need f or development of land use which will provide an ade tax base to f inance. these i ncreased costs and access to emplo opportunities f or such population (c) The Cit Council of the Cit of Maplewood ("the Cit has received from FED Investments,* a g eneral partnership or under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the "Compan a proposal that.the. Cit assist in financin a Pro hereinafter described, throu the issuance of a Revenue Bond or Bonds or a Rev- enue Note or Notes hereinafter referred to in this resolution as "Revenue Bonds" pursuant to the Act 5� (d) The C.Jt desires to facilitate the selective development of the communit retain and improve its tax base and help it provide the ran of services and emplo opportunities re b its population and said Pro will assist the Cit in achievin those ob The Pro will help to increase assessed valuation of the Cit and help mairtain a positive relationship between assessed valuation and debt and enhance the ima and reputation of the Cit (e) Compan is currentl en in the business of ownin and operatin self-stora facilities The Pro to be financed b the Revenue Bonds is a self-stora facilit to be located in the Cit and consists of the ac of land and the construction of buildin and improvements thereon and the install- ation of e the and will result in the emplo of 8 to 10 additional persons to work within the new facilities (f) The Cit has been advised b representatives of Compan that conventional, commercial financin to pa the capital cost of the Pro is available onl C.Isis on a limited b * and at such hi costs of borrowin that the economic feasibilit of operatin the Pro would be si reduced, but Compan has also advised this Council that with the aid of municipal financin and its resultin low borrowin cost, the Pro is economicall more feasible ( Pursuant to a resolution of the Cit Council adopted on Februar 25., 1980 a public hearin on the Project was held on. March 20, 1980, after notice was pub lished,, and materials made available for public inspection at the Cit Hall, all as re b Minnesota Statutes, Section 474001 Subdivision 7b at which public .hearin all those appearin at said hearin so desired to speak were heard (h) No public official of the Cit has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Pro nor will an public official either directl or indirectl .benefit financiall from the Project, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED b the Cit Council of the Cit of Yiaplewood Minnesota, as follows* 9 3/20 1. The Council. hereb g ives preliminar approval to the proposal of Compan that the Cit undertake the Pro pursuant to the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (Chapter 474, Minnesota, Statutes) , -consistin of the ac construction and e of facilities wi the Cit pursuant to Compan specifications suitable for the operations described above and g ives preliminar approval to a revenue a between the Cit and Compan upon s terms and conditions with provils-ions for revision from time to time as necessar so as to produce income and revenues sufficient to pa when due, the principal of and interest on the Revenue Bonds in the total principal- amount of approximatel $1.,000,000 to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the ac construction and e q uippin g .of the -Pro and. the Cit hereb undertakes preliminaril to issue its Revenue Bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions 2. On the basis of information available to this Council it appears, and the Council hereb finds, that the Pro constitutes properties, real and personal, used.. or useful in connection with one- or more -revenue producin enterprises en in any . business within the meanin of. Subdivision la of Sect 474.02 of the Act, that the Pro furthers the purposes stated in Section 474.01 Minnesota Statutes that the availabilit of the financin under the.Act and willin of the Cit to furnish such financin will be a substantial indt:-cement to Compan to undertake the Pro and that the effect of the Pro if undertaken, will be to encoura the development of economicall sound industr and commerce..' to assist in the pre-vention of the emer of bli and mar land, to help prevent chronic unemplo to help the Cit retain and improve its tax base and provide the ran of sere = ices and empol opportunities re b its populat-.'.on, to help prevent the move-a,.,ent of talented and educated persons out of the State and to areas within the State vihere their services ma not be as effectivel used, to promote more intensive development and use of land within the Cit and to eventuall increase the ' Cit 's tax base 3. The Project is hereb g iven preliminar approval b the Cit subject to the approval of the Project b the Comnlissioner of Securities, and subject to finE.11 approval b this Council,, Compan and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the ultimate details of the financin of the Project . 4. In accordance with Subdivision 7a of Section 474.01 Minnesota Statutes,, the Ma and the Cit is hereb authorized and directed to -submit the proposal for the Pro to the Commissioner of Securities., re the Commissioner's approval, and other officers, emplo and a of the Cit are hereb authorized to provide the Commissioner with such preliminar information as the Commissioner ma re I 5. Compan has a and it is hereb determined that an and all costs incurred b the Cit in connection with the financin of the Pro whether or not the Pro is carried to completion and whether or not approved b the Commissioner will be paid b Compan 6. Bri and Mor Professional Association, actin as bond counsel, and Juran and Mood Inc., investment bankers., are authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessar documents relatin to the Pro to consult with the Cit Attorne Compan and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms and provisions of the Revenue Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessar documents and to submit such documents to the Council for TE-Anal approval 7. Nothin in this resolution or in the documents prepared pursuant hereto shall QW" 1 — 3/20 authorize the expenditure of an municilp,@1 funds on the Pro other than the revenues derived from the Pro or otherwise g rdrited to the Cit for this purpose, The,. Revenue Bonds shall not const a char lien or encumbrance, le or e upon an propert or funds of. the Cit except the revenue and proceeds pled .to the pa thereof, nor 'Shall the Cit be sub to an liabilit thereon. The holder of the Revenue Bonds shall never have the ri to compel an exercise of the taxin power of t he Cit to pa the outstandin principal on the Revenue Bonds or the interest thereon., or to enforce pa thereof a an propert of the Cit The Revenue Bonds - shall recite in substance that the Revenue Bonds, includin interest thereon, are pa so-1-el from the revenue and proceeds pled to the pa thereof.. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the Cit within the meanin of an constitutional or statutor limitation 80 In anticipation of the approval b the Commissioner of Securities and the issuance of the Revenue Bonds to f inance -all or a portion of the Pro and in order that completion of the Pro will not be undul dela when approved, Compan is hereb authorized to make such expenditures and advances toward pa of that portion of -,--he costs of the Project to be financed from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds as Compan considers necessar includin the use of interim, short- term financin sub to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds if and when delivered but otherwise without liabilit on the part of the Cit The actions of the Cit Clerk in causin public notice of the public hearin and in describin the g eneral nature of the Pro and estimatin the principal amount of bonds to be issued to finance the Pro and in preparin a draft of- the proposed application to the Commissioner of Securities,. State of Minnesota, for approval of the Pro which has been available for inspection b the public at the Cit Hall from and after the publication of notice of the hearin are in all respects ratified and confirmed. 'Adopted b the Cit Council of the Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota this 20th da of March, 1930. Seconded b Councilman Anderson. A - Ma Greavu, Councilmen Anderson, Bastian and Nelson. Councilperson Juker abstained. 3. PUD/Preliminar Plat, Street Vacation: Beaver Lake Hills 8:00 P.M& a. Ma Greava co the meetin for a public hearin re the re of Arlin Properties for a.Planned Unit Development Preliminar Plat approval for Beaver Lake Hills vacation of East Geranium Avenue from the centerline of Lakewood Drive easterl approximatel 1320 feet. The Clerk stated the public hearin notices were found to be in order and noted the dates of publication. b. Mana Evans presented the staff report. C. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the followin Plannin Commission recommendation* -1 "Commissioner Prew moved that the Plannin Commission recommend to the " Cit Council that the Planned Unit Development should be approved providin t hat the followin is incorporated into the proposal: Me Street.is extended. to the intersection of Mar Avenue and the Beaver Lake Mobile Home Park drive 2. Geranium A-%7-enue is deleted and. the ad units moved to front on Me Street. kl� 11 - 3/20 30 Extend Mar Court t o the south propert line, with a temporar cul-de-sac. 4. El*m"nation of I I private d on Lakewood Drive. The other items were not addressed b the Plannin Commission as it was felt the were not of a plannin nature. Commissioner Kishel seconded. Commissioner Fischer .moved to amend the motion to include the followin condition.- Show a 12 foot trail easement from Mar (-3ourt to the intersection of -Ma Avenue and Me Street. The applicant should meet with the -Director of Communit Services to determine the exact location, Commissioner Kishel seconded® A - 6 Na - I (Conunissioner Prew) Votin on the motion as amended: A - all." d. Mr. Dale Hamilton, Suburban En representin Arlin Properties, spoke on behalf of the - proposal. e.,, Mr. Richard Schreier, Arlin Properties, spoke re his proposal. f. Ma Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or a g ainst the proposal. The followin stated their opinilon's. Mr. Ernest Dreawves, Lakewood Drive, Mr. Harr Zacho g . Ma Greavu closed the public hearin h. Councilman Nelson moved to approve the pr.el-iininar plat for Beaver Lake Hills subject to the followin conditions. 1. Approval of the Planned Unit Development.* 2. Footin for q uad units shall be pinned b a re surve before the foundation is laid to assure that part walls will be constructed exactl on common lot lines. 3. Deed restrictions shall be filed a each lot, re that those lots. shall onl be used for the use approved under the Planned Unit D evelopment. This will assure that lots without street fronta will not be sold for other uses. Submission of bike trail easement-s,, to be approved b the Director of Communit Services. 5. Submission of easements for the temporar cut -de-sac, to be approved b the Direc of Public Works. 6. Implementation of the reco of the Soil Conservation Service in their report of Januar 7, 1980. T. Staff shall re a formal surve of the site b the Historical Societ on April 1. 12 3/20 8. The final plat, shall not be approved, until.:' as A si developers a is submitted to the Director of Public Works, 0 b. Approval of the final g radin g and draina plans b the Director of Public Works, g ivin g special consideration to the recommendations of of the Soil Conservation Service, The plan must: (1) show four acre-feet of stora capacit in the north-west pond, subject to Count takin ri (2) remove existin culverts alon open channel, reali channel to avoid William's Pipeline, install pipeline crossin and dedicate appropriate draina easements, C.. Pa of deferred assessments for sanitar sewer. d. Council orders t he construction of the 12 acre-foot holdin pond on the propert to the southwest, as shown on the "Maplewood Draina Plan. Seconded b Councilman Anderson. A - all. . - 0 1. Councilman Nelson introduced the followin resolution and moved its aclo RL ion: 80 - 3 - 74, WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 412,851, the the Maplewood Cit Council, u pon Petition of a ma of the owi, . iers of the land abuttin the street proposed to be vacated, and after a public. hearin preceeded, b two (2) weeks published and posted notice, proposes Lhe vacation of the follo described street located Ger Avenue to wit., Geranium Avenue from the centerline of Lake Drive easterl approximatel 1320 feet. Propert affected: Lots 5 thru 8, Block I and Lots 5 thru 8, Block 2, Beaver Lake Addition WHEREAS, the Maplewood Cit Council finds that the vacation of the above described street are in the interest of the public due to chan land uses and obsolete plattin NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, b the Cit Council, Ramse Count Minnesota,, that the above -des street be and hereb are, vacated and the Cit Cl-erk is hereb directed to prepare a notic of completion of the proceedin purstiant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851 thereof, and shall cause the same to be' presented to the Count Auditor for entr upon his transfer records and the same shall be thereafter filed with the Ramse Count Recorder,, Seconded b Councilman Anderson. A - all. oft* 13 - 3/20 j. Ma Greavu introduced the followin resolution and moved i adopt-lon: 80 - 3 - 75 WliEREUS, a petition was filed with the Cit o f Maplewood as provided under Section 915.010 of the Municipal Code of the Cit of Maplewood, said petition havin been si b more than ' 50% of the owners of propert within 200 feet of the propert described as follows: Lots 5, 61 7 and 8,, Block 1, and the Nort-h 224 feet of Lot -5 and 6 all of Lot 7 and 8, Block 2 all in Beaver Lake Addition in the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 25, Townsh 29, Ran 22 which has been proposed for Special Use'Permi-t. W a public hearin was held on March 20, 1980, at 8:00 P.M. in the Cit Hall, notice thereof havin been dul pidbli'shed in the official Cit news- paper, and notice of said hearin havin beeri mailed to all propert owners of record within 200 feet of the area proposed for Planned Unit Development to consist of 184 q uad units (46 buildin ; and WHEREAS, the Cit Plannin Commission has made its recommendations and .WHEREAS, it appears for the best interest of the public that said petition be g ranted ; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA 31 1% 31 51 that the petition for the above described Special Use Permit for Planned Unit 0 - Development to consist Of 184 q uad units (46 buildin be g ranted, subject to all the followin conditions: 1. Extend Mar Court to the south propei-t line, with a temporar cul.-de-sac. 2. Dedicate an additional 161- feet of ri on the east side of Lakewood Drive for the McKni Road Improvement Pro 3. Provide an 8 foot trail easement the shortest wa from Mar Court to the intersection of Ma Avenue and Me Street. The applicant should meet with staff to ne il-_-he foot trail il easement, 4. Desi Outlot A as a pondin easement, 5. Submission of an Environmental Assestment Worksheet. 6. Loop the internal watermain on Me Street and dedicate appropriate easements, 7. Provide utilit and draina easements as re b Director of Public Works. 8. Private drives shall not be allowed on Lakewood Drive. 9. A buildin permit must be taken out for the first unit, within 2 y ears of PUD approval. Council ma renew the PUD if no substantial chan have occurred. that would have a ne impact on the pro the Cit or the surroundin area. 1.4 3/20 77, Seconded b Councilperson Juker. A - all. Ma Greavu turned the meetin over to Actin Ma Nelson. 5. Li License: Maplewood Bowl - 8:30 P I .M. a. Actin Ma Nelson convened the meetin for a public hearin re the application of Mr. Dou Thorp for an On Sale Intoxicatin Li License at the Maplewood Bowl, 1955 En Street. b. Mana Evans presented the staff report and expressed the followin concerns: One I is that ade restaurant facilities will be maintained to compl with the Sunda Li openin provisions. We have expressed these concerns to the applicant, pointin out that the restaurant menu should be complete and the li servin a. convenience associated with the food, and not the other wa around. A second concern has been that the success of their operations at the other locations has cc-used over-capacit situations inside the - structures a related parkin problems outside the buildin At the present level of operation, park- in is often ver ti at the Maplewood Bowl. The proposed addition of g ame room facilities and several bars could severEkl compound this alread capacit parkin situation. The applicants should be re to provide ade on- premise parkin The third area of concern is that the enlar g ame room area will brin more y oun g people in.-o the center, This will increase the problem of ascertainin that y oun g undera people are not consumin alcoholic bevera on the premises. This problem has been discussed with the app.licants, and the assure us that the b ade securit forces., have policed this at the other location A final concern is that ade exterior securit be provided. The present. operation has g enerated man reports of thefts from vehicles, vandalism to customers' cars,, loiterin in the lot, particularl b y oun g people, and drink- in in vehicles.- The applicant has been made aware of this situation and 3..ndi- cated that the feel that the can correct this situation., Ma Greavu returned to chair the meetin c Mr. Dou Thorp, 9531-16th Avenue South, Bloomin the applicant, stated he would make a commitment to make-sure the Cit concerns were handled and the situation corrected. d. Ma Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. elm Ma Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Ma Greavu closed .the. public hearin g . Council-man Nelson introduced the followin and moved its ad 80 - 3 - 76 NOTICE IS H.11-74REBY GIVEN, that pursuant to action b the Cit Council of the Cit of Maplewood, on March 20, 1980, an On Sale Intoxicating Li License was -,nt C -canter, approved, for Dou Michael. Thorp, dba Maplewood Bowl Entertainm( 15 3/20 ,1955 En Street. The Council proceeded in this matter as outlined under the provisions of the Cit Ordinanc6se Seconded b Councilman Anderson A - all* I. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Mr.- . Allan Christensen., Lakeview Lutheran Church - a. Mro Christensen re Council d the proposed assessment that would 0 bas been asked to provide -an easement affect Lakeview Lutheran Church. The Church 1 and .they do not want to enter into all a without knowing about the assess- ments. ts until such time b. Council stated they could not answer an r as the public hearing to adopt such assessmentso J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Ordinance: Fire Protection Char to h Char a. Mana Evans stated since the e stablishment of the fire protection charge be in 1977, there has been confusion and misunderstandings as to the purpose of this char , Volunteer members of the City fire departments have been particularly unhappy because man residents believe the f ire protection char is used. to pa City firefi Actuall the fire protection char is used pplement water availability char and water surcharges for financingthe to-su in the attached. In order to lessen the confusion Cit s water s as outlined Of the attached and misti-nderstandings regarding this, first reading is recommended c t .­t e, :qill chan the title from fire protection char to b 'r a'.,. char ordinance • which mo first reading of an ordinance amendin Chapter 1506 b. councilperson Juker Hydrant Cha ip to c wordin from Fire Protection Charge to Seconded by Councilman Anderson. A - all. 3. Plannin COMIRissiOn Appointments Com mission, caused a. Mana Evans stated there are two vacancies the Plannin b the resi of Chuck Kent and Bev Kroiss. The c ommission, -at their March 3 meeting, recommended the followin candidates in order of preference: For Chuck Kent's position: Dwi Fernandez' Ralph Sletten Don Christianson2 Jr. For Bev KroitDs position Philip Krinkie David Whitcomb Don Christianson, Jr. 0- j _ 6 3/20 Resumes for the above candidates are enclosed Both of these appointments would be for three y ear terms,, be Januar 1, 1980. b& The Council interviewed David Whitcomb, Don Cbristianson, Jr. and Ralph SlettenO C. Councilman Anderson moved to appoint David Whitcomb to a three y ear term effective January-l-L. -19800 Seconded b Ma Greavu. A - all. C. Councilperson'Juker moved to table the' appointment to fill Chuck Kent s p as all the recommended l app_l cants could, not be present® Seconded b Councilman Anderson. A - all Communit Desi Review Board - Appointment a. Mana Evans stated at the March 11, 1980 meetin of the Communit Desi Review Board the Board recommended that Council appoint the followin persons to f ill the Board.' s two vacant seats: Cher A. Pennin and Pe A* Schwiezer. I b. Councilman Bastian moved to table the appointments to the Communit Desi Review Board. until the Council could meet the applicants.. ..Seconded b Ma Grea.vu® A - all. 2. Resoluti-on: Fcasibilil-_- Stud - Hillwood Dr and Dorland Road a. 1-11ana Evans stated the revised feasibi"Lity stud for the above pro is presented here for y our information. It is recomm ended that the report be accepted and a public hearin be scheduled for April 17111 19800 b. Councilman Anderson introduced the followin resolution and Moved its ad 80 - 3 - 77 WHEREAS , the Cit En for the C it y of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare preliminar plans for the improvement of the area froul McKni Road to approximately 2000 feet east between Mailand Road and Linwood Avenue to approximately 600 feet south b etween McKni Road and approximately 1300 feet east b construction of watermains� street construction, storm sewer sanitar sewers, and appurtenances. WHEREAS, the said Cit En has prepared the aforesaid preliminar plans for the improvement herein described: NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MATLEWOOD MINNESOTA as follows*4 The report of the Cit En advising this Council t the proposed improvement of the area from McKni Road to approximately 2000 feet east between 11ailand Road and Linwood Avenue to approximately 600 feet sou-L'--h be- tween McKnI Road and approximately 1300 feet east b construction of sanitary sewer, watermain:? storm - sewer, streets and appurtenances (Public � 17 - 3/20 Improvement Pro 78-10) is feasible and should best be made as proposed is hereb received* 2 ' The Council will consider the aforesaid. improvement in accordance with .. the reports and the assessment of benefited propert for all or a port-i-on of the cost of the improvement accordin to M.S.A. Chdpter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $1,194,260o 3. A publ . ic hearin -will be held in the Council Chambers of the City hall at 1380 Frost Avenue on Thursda the l7th da of April, 1980, at 7:.30 PeMe to consider said improvement. The notice for said public hearin shall. be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF HEARING OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN WHEREAS., the Cit Council of the Cit of Maplewood, Ramse Count Min-nesota., d deems it necessar and expedient that the improvement hereinafter describel, be ma NOW THEREFORE, notice is hereb g iven that the city Council will hold a public hearin on said improvement at the fo llowin g time and place within the sail. Cit Date and Time: April 17, 1-980 at 7:30 P.M. Location: Council Chambers of the Cit Hall, 1380 Frost Avenue I , The g eneral nature of the improvement 'is. the construction of sanitary Ei. ewer, 7 watermain, storm sew . er.., streets and appur-cenances (Public Improvement J_)ro 78---11-0) in the following described areafeb from McKni Road to approxinliately 2000 feet ea,.3>t between Mailand Road and Linwood Avenue to approximatel.';.600 feet south between McKni Road and approximately 1300 feet east. The total estimated cost of said improvement is $1.1194.2600 It is proposi::,d to assess ever lot, piece or parcel of land benefited. b said improvement whether abuttin thereon or not, based upon benefits received without re to cash valuation. Persons desirin g to . be heard with reference to the proposed improvement should be present at this hearin This Council proposes to proceed under the authorit g ranted b Chapt . e.,,.- 429 M S *Ao Dated this 20th da of March, 19800 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ Lucille E. Aurelius Cit Clerk Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota Seconded b Councilperson Juker,, A - all. 0- 18 - 3/20 e- and extend the meeti he d to waive the Rules of Procedures Ma Greavu 'nov deadlinee A all* Seconded by Cou ncilman Anderson* 5. Accounts Payable' Fees Services and o nts (Part I - a . Councilman Anderson moved that the acc._.u.._..,, .. 5 $ 116 195o44- Check No® throe Check No 0.0411 Check No, 004070 - pa 1 11 Check No. e -x.penses Part $423,458v40: - hrough Ch k No. 0051-76 - 'O 0049-90 U. C the amount of $59 73.59 be throu Check NOIS $50��51 .75) aid 23670 thro -as submitte. .-d Juker. A all® Seconded b CouncilPerson COUNG IL PRESENTATIOTqS K'a 1. Open Meeting a. Councilperson I Joker' asked. q uestions re the Open Meeting,Lawe 2, Ordinance or Policy - Sewer - Health Emer • there was an or dinance or policy where Coun cilman Nelson q uestioned a. health emer sewer mains cOu-1d be c onstructed if it were a g ates b, Sta.-H will i11V'("s'__-L Road B -.Germain and Sandhurst y 3® Count - 0 'a the water drainage problem .1 ere w C ' 111.c i lman Anderson stated, there was a sev 1 4 - a Cou Roc-31d B - Germ aln *� s ..n_dhui_st area&, area o _L L_ I esolutiOn and moved its adop-L'Ori.: be Counc ilm an &nderson introduced.­..the follow r e 80 3 - 78 RESOL . BY THE CITY C OUNCIL.OF IIAPLEWOOD9 MINNESOTA, that Ramsey County VED vicinity Cou t under ad "B" in the vicini is hereby re to install a culver-.L oblems to resident of the intersection Of Kennard di Street to relieve flooding pr Road "B" located oil north side of Count ,v Seconded b Councilman Bastian. A - all. 1 1cKni g ht. Road oved for Mc Kni g ht Road have been app r a. Ma Greavu stated the alignment plans i North of Mar without a brid over the railroad tracks o n McKn & & b. Ma Greavu in troduced the fo llowin g re I t s a d option Solu tion and moved 80 - 3 - 79 WHEREAS, • is deemed advisable to I provide for a railroad overpass . ass at the 3/20 1-9 - crossing of the C & NW Railline an. McKni -iorth of Mar Avenue Road, i , Roa NOW,, THEREt'l-J'ORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA, that Ramse Count is re to provide for an overpass of the railline in the plans to. up McKni Road. Seconded b Cou Anderson. A - all® 5. Letter - Archdiocese - Hi 120 and Larpenteu.r Avenue a. Ma Gre.a I vu. in if Staff had received a letter from the St.. Paul Archdiocese re their intentions for their property at Hi 120 and Larpenteur Aven-�.ie. b. Staff will.(,---ontact the St. Paul Archdiocese, Councilperson Juker moved to waive the Rules of Procedures and extend meetin past the midni deadline. Seconded b Ma Greavu® A Ma Greavu, Councilperson Juker, Councilmen. Anderson and Nelson. Na Bastian 7. Re for Stale Audit a. Ma Greavu moved. that the Council re a State Audit. Motion died for lack of a. second. be Sta.'C statec"t Maplewood is now bein audited b -a state approved audit firm* C. Mr. Frank McGinle 2044 Prosperit Road ,% explained how he was taken to conciliation court becau he did not pa a $7.00 paramedic bill. He feel s a state audit should be done. 6 Out of State Travel a© Ma Greavu moved that Council cancel out of State travel b staff. Motion died for lack of a second. Item K-8 - Joint Fire Chief's Re - Insurance, will be placed on April 3, 1980 A as meetin w<-4,.s . abruptl adjourned before item could be discussed. Me ADJOURNMENT 12:10 A*M* Cit 20 3/20 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:30 P.M., Thursday, April 3, 1980 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 80-9 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7:34 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilman Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilman Present Frances L. Joker, Councilperson Present Earl L. Nelson, Councilman Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes No. 80-7 (March 13, 1980) Councilman Anderson moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 80-7 (March 13, 1980) as submitted. Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes - all. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Councilperson Joker moved to place Items H 4 and 5 before Item E - Consent Agenda. Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the agenda as amended: 1. Rates 2. Appointments 3. Road Conditions 4. Ditch No. 17 5. Labor Contracts 6. Motor Vehicle 7. Response to Manager's Memo 8. City Garage 9. Moratorium on Hiring 10. Tours with Staff 11. Health Officer - Monthly Report Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all. - 1 - 4/3 H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 4. Planning Commission Appointment a. Director of Community Development Olson stated Mr. Hernandez does not wish to be considered. b. Councilperson Joker moved to appoint Mr. Commission to a three year term effective Ja Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. 5. Community Design Review Board Appointment the a. The applicants, Ms. Peg Schwietzer and Ms. Cheryl Penning presented their reasons for wishing to serve on the Community Design Review Board. b. Councilman Nelson moved to appoint Cheryl Penning and Peg Schwietzer to the Community Design Review Board for a two year term each effective January 1, 1980. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. E. CONSENT AGENDA Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilperson Juker, Councilmen Anderson and Nelson. Councilman Bastian abstained. Council removed Items 1, 2, 3, 4 and 8 from the Consent Agenda to become J- 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13. Councilman Anderson moved, seconded by Councilman Nelson, Ayes - all to approve Items 5. 6 and 7 of the Consent Agenda as recommended. 5. Disposal of Old Financial Records Resolution No. 80-4-80 WHEREAS, M.S.A. 138.17 governs the destruction of City records; and WHEREAS, a list of records has been presented to the Council with a request in writing that destruction be approved by the Council; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. That the Finance Director is hereby directed to apply to the Minnesota State Historical Society for an order authorizing destruction of the records as described in the attached list. 2. That upon approval by the State of the attached application, the Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to destroy the records listed. 6. Easements for Project 75-6 Approved the following acquisition of easements for Larpenteur Howard Improvement 75-6: - 2 - 4/3 Parcel 3 Parcel 2 Parcel 5 $ 2,950.00 1,450.00 1,800.00 7. Ordinance to Change Fire Protection Charges to Hydrant Charge (Second Reading) ORDINANCE NO. 485 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1506 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO FIRE PROTECTION CHARGES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That all references to the term fire protection charge in Chapter 1506 of the Municipal Code shall be deleted and replaced by the term hydrant charge. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force beginning May 1, 1980. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Rezoning: McKnight Road - Council - 7:30 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposed zone change from R-3 to R-1 of a parcel of land located east of McKnight Road and north of the Chicago -St. Paul -Minneapolis and Omaha Railway lines. The Clerk noted the dates of publication of the hearing notice and stated such notice was in order. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report recommending tabling of the Zone Change until Council has adopted the Land Use Plan Update. C. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Pellish moved the Planning Commission table the zone change based on staff analysis until Council has adopted a Land Use Plan update. Commissioner Fischer seconded. Ayes all." d. Mr. Bruce Odlaug, 332 Hamm Building, opposes the rezoning. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Councilman Nelson moved t R-1 the nronerty as stated in from R-3 to not Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes - all. - 3 - 4/3 2. Preliminary Plat: Valleyview Estates - 7:45 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of New Life Land Development Company, Inc. for approval of the Valleyview Estates Preliminary Plat located north of Highwood Avenue and approximately 960 feet east of McKnight Road. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in order and noted the dates of publication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report subject to the following recommend- ation: Approval of the preliminary plat, with the following conditions: 1. A signed developer's agreement shall be submitted to the City Engineer before final plat approval. Such agreement shall include construction of a five foot wide asphalt or concrete trail on the Highwood Avenue right of way, from the east line of lot 4 to the west line of lot 1. 2. A final grading and drainage plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval before final plat approval. d. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Pellish moved that the Planning Commission recommend to the Council approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. A signed developer's agreement shall be submitted to the City Engineer before final plat approval. Such agreement shall include construction of a five foot wide asphalt or concrete trail on the Highwood Avenue right of way, from the last line of lot 4 to the west line of lot 1. 2. A final grading and drainage plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval before final plat approval. Commissioner Kishal seconded. Commissioner Sherburne moved an amendment to the motion to remove from condition #1 such agreement to include construction of a five foot wide asphalt or concrete trail on Highwood Avenue right of way from the east line of lot 4 to the west line of lot 1. Commissioner Prew seconded. Voting on Amendment: Ayes 2 Nays 7 Amendment fails. Voting on the motion: Ayes all." d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. - 4 - 4/3 g. Councilman Anderson (consisting of 5 dwelli. following conditions: -lots and one of 1. A signed developer's agreement shall be submitted to the City Engineer before final plat approval. Such agreement shall in- clude a letter of credit for the future construction of a five foot wide asphalt or concrete trail on the Highwood Avenue right of way, from the east line of lot 4 to the west line of lot 1. 2. A final grading and drainage plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval before final plat approval. Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - Councilperson Juker, Councilmen Anderson, Bastian and Nelson. Nays - Mayor Greavu. 3. Used Car Lot License - Arcade Street and East Larpenteur Avenue 8:00 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Donald E. Gaetke, for a Used Car Lot License at 1685 Arcade Street. The Clerk stated the public hearing notice was in order and also stated the dates of publication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report including the following recommend- ation: 1. A total display of a maximum of 24 used cars for sale at any time be specified on a paved surface. 2. An area for parking of three employee's vehicles and three customer's vehicles be designated and maintained on a paved ,surface. 3. The driveway access be limited by curbing or concrete car stops to two 24-foot driveways for a total of 48 feet of driveway access. 4. All paving added should provide for adequate drainage to the public streets acceptable to the Director of Public Works. 5. Night minimal security lighting to prevent vandalism and thefts from vehicles should be provided. 6. A valid State Used Car Permit in the name of the licensee should be required for the City of Maplewood license to be valid. c. Mr. Don Gaetke, 7090 Silver Lake Road, Moundsview, Minnesota, the applicant, spoke on behalf of his proposal. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard: Mr. Randy Bacchus, Bacchus Construction Co., 1701 Arcade, stated his concerns. - 5 - 4/3 f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Used Car Lot License requested by Mr. Don Gaetke to be located at 1685 Arcade Street subject to the following conditions: 1. A total display of a maximum of 24 used cars for sale at any time be specified on a paved surface. 2. An area for parking of three employee's vehicles and three customer's vehicles be designated and maintained on a paved surface. 3. The driveway access be limited by curbing or concrete car stops to two 24-foot driveways for a total of 48 feet of driveway access. 4. All paving added should provide for adequate drainage to the public streets acceptable to the Director of Public Works. 5. Night minimal security lighting to prevent vandalism and thefts from vehicles should be provided. 6. A valid State Used Car Permit in the name of the licensee should be required for the City of Maplewood license to be valid. 7. In the future, if needed, a condition regarding screening and lighting will be imposed. Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all. 4. Preliminary PUD Revision - Mapleknoll - Radatz Avenue 8:15 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Realty Management Services, Inc. for an amendment to a Special Use Permit for a preliminary Planned Unit Development located on a parcel of land south of Radatz Avenue and west of White Bear Avenue. The Clerk stated the public hearing notice was in order and also stated the dates of publication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report with the following recommendation: Staff still feels that the project as previously proposed is the best alternative. Since Council denied this project, conditions Is through lb could be modified to allow for alternative plans, while still meeting minimum City standards: No building permits shall be issued, unless Council orders the following public improvement projects: a. An adequate sized and designed water main to serve the project, as determined by the Director of Public Works. b. Upgrading of Radatz Avenue from White Bear Avenue to proposed Southlawn Drive, if Radatz Avenue is used as an access. c. Construction of Southlawn Drive from Radatz Avenue to Beam Avenue. - 6 - 4/3 d. Construction of the storm water project shown in the Maplewood Drainage Plan for Radatz Avenue. All necessary easements shall also be dedicated to the City. This project includes piping, ponding, and control devices. c. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Kishel moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council denial of the applicants request to eliminate conditions Is through Id. Commissioner Pellish seconded. Ayes 6 Nays 1 (Commissioner Fischer) Commissioner Kishel moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the following modifications to the previously approved preliminary planned unit development: , 1. No building permits shall be issued, unless Council orders the following public improvement projects: a. An adequate sized and designed water main to serve the project, as determined by the Director of Public Works. b. Upgrading of Radatz Avenue from White Bear Avenue to proposed Southlawn Drive, if Radatz Avenue is used as an access. c. Construction of Southlawn Drive from Radatz Avenue to Beam Avenue if it is deemed necessary. d. Construction of the storm water project shown in the Maplewood Drainage Plan for Radatz Avenue. All necessary easements shall also be dedicated to the City. This project includes piping, ponding, and control devices. Commissioner Barrett seconded. Ayes all." d. Mr. Mike McKenna, Realty Management Services, Inc., spoke on behalf of the proposal. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard: Mr. Wayne Fox, 1893 Kohlman Mr. Eugene White, 1850 Radatz Mr. H. Hassinger, 2752 Gem Street. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Councilman Anderson moved to table this item until the meeting of April 1' 1980 to allow developer to negotiate with the property owner to the west for oossible easements and to allow staff to investigate what the impact will be and drainage. Seconded by Councilman Nelson. G. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Removal of Cope Avenue House Ayes - all. - 7 - 4/3 a. Manager Evans stated the City did not receive any bids on the removal of the house at the northwest corner of Cope Avenue and English Street. The specifi- cations for the project involved have been rewritten to include the removal of the house as part of the contract. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Mal Practice Insurance - Fire Services a. Manager Evans stated the City's Fire Departments have requested their fire personnel who augment the paramedic services be provided with mal practice in- surance through the City's insurance program. b. Mayor Greavu moved that the fire services personnel who augment the paramedi ambulance services be included in the City's mal practice insurance coverage at an approximate cost of $1,900.00. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. 2. Frank McGinley - Audit a. Mr. Frank McGinley stated he has not received the information he requested from the City and he is not prepared tonight. b. Item tabled to April 17, 1980. 3. Cable T.V. a. Manager Evans presented a copy of a letter from White Bear Lake concerning a joint powers agreement and establishing a Cable Television Service Territory. b. Councilman Bastian moved to express Maplewood's intent to be considered for inclusion in the appropriate Cable TV territory (preferably the municipalities that have school districts in Maplewood). Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. c. Ms. Joan Goodge, Minnesota Cable Systems, answered questions regarding Cable TV territories. I. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None. J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Renewal of Home Occupation Permit - 2620 Feller Parkway a. Manager Evans presented the staff report with the recommendation to renew the applicant's Special Exception permit for a five year period, subject to the following: 1. The City Council may review the use for possible nuisance conditions during the renewal period. If, at the end of the renewal period, no nuisance con- ditions exist, the permit may be renewed. 2. The applicant shall continue to provide off street parking for customers. - 8 - 4/3 3. All hair cutting related activities are to be confined to the approved shop area. (Staff received a complaint in May, 1979, that the applicant was cut- ting hair outside in view of the neighbors). 4. A Model 2A20BC fire extinguisher is to be installed in a readily accessible location. b. Councilman Nelson moved renewal of the special exception permit for Daniel Spadino, 2620 Keller Parkway, to operate a home barber shop for a five year od subject to the following conditions: 1. The City Council may review the use for possible nuisance conditions during the renewal period. If, at the end of the renewal period, no nuisance conditions exist, the permit may be renewed. 2. The applicant shall continue to provide off street parking for customers. 3. All hair cutting related activities are to be confined to the approved shop area. 4. A Model 2A20BC fire extinguisher is to be installed in a readily access- ible location. Seconded by Councilperson Joker. Ayes - all. 2. Rezoning Initiation: White Bear Avenue - Johnson a. Manager Evans stated staff had received a request to rezone a 4.6 acre parcel of land on the east of White Bear Avenue south of Radatz Avenue from Farm Resi- dence to R-3 Multiple and R-2 Double Dwelling. If Council decides to initiate this rezoning, I would recommend that the developer be required to furnish the normally required abstractor's list and $100.00 application fee. b. Councilman Anderson the staff report and an Seconded by Mayor Greavu. 3. Housing Code Lair's recommen and the $100.00 Ayes - all. a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. earing as requested in t the developer furnish b. Mr. Dave Reynolds, 315 E. Larpenteur Avenue, spoke in favor of a housing code. c. Mayor Greavu with the HRA on A table this item until after the shirt Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. 4. Final Plans and Specifications: Gervais Avenue Highway 61 to English Street - Project 78-1 a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilman Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: - 9 - 4/3 80-4- 81 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the City Council on September 6, 1979, plans and specifications for Gervais Avenue - East of Highway 61, Maplewood Project No. 78-1, have been prepared by or under the direction of the City Engineer, and he has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper (and in the Construction Bulletin) an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published three times, with the first publication at least three weeks before date set for bid opening and shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered by the Council at the time and date selected by the City Engineer, at the City Hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, for 5% of the amount of such bid. 3. The City Clerk and City Engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. 4. The.advertisement for bids shall be in substantially the following form: ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS The City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, will receive sealed bids for the construction of the following approximate quantities: 2,000 feet of bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter, and 13000 feet of 12" to 36" storm sewer within the City limits on the basis of cash payment for the work. Bids will be received until 2 o'clock P.M., on the 6th day of May, 1980, at the Municipal Building, 1380 Frost Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota, at which time and place all bids will be publicly opened, read aloud and considered. Proposals must be placed in a sealed envelope with the statement thereon in- dicating proposal for bid contained within and addressed to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota. Proposals shall be submitted to the City Clerk on or before the above stated time. Proposal is for the furnishing of all labor, equipment and materials and performing all work in connection with the above stated construction. Proposal forms, including specifications, are on file in the office of Schoell and Madson, Inc., located at 50 Ninth Avenue South, Hopkins, Minnesota, 55343. Copies of the documents may be obtained by depositing $50.00 with the Engineer. The amount of deposit for one set of documents will be refunded to each actual bidder who returns the plans and documents in good condition within ten days after the opening of bids. - 10 - 4/3 All bids must be accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, in an amount equal to five per cent (5%) of the total bid, conditioned that if the bidder is the successful bidder he will enter into a contract in accordance with said bid and will furnish such performance bonds as are specified. No bidder may withdraw his bid for at least thirty (30) days after the scheduled closing time for the receipt of bids, without the consent of the owner. The City Council reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive irregularities and informalities therein and further reserves the right to award the contract in the best interest of the City. /s/ Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk, City of Maplewood, Minnesota Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all. 5. Feasibility Study: Gall Avenue and Lakewood Drive - Project 79-10 - 79-11 a. Manager Evans presented a feasibility study addressing both projects: 79-10 and 79-11. It is recommended that a public hearing be scheduled for May 8, 1980. b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 80-4-82 WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare preliminary plans for the improvement of Lakewood Drive by construction of streets, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, watermains, and all nec- essary appurtenances (Public Improvement Project 79-11); and WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid preliminary plans for the improvement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the City Engineer advising this Council that the proposed improvement on Lakewood Drive by construction of streets, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, watermains, and all necessary appurtenances is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to M.S.A. Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $346,933. 3. A public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1380 Frost Avenue on Thursday, the first day of May, 1980, at 7:30 P.M. to consider said improvement. The notice for said public hearing shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF HEARING OF PUBLIC IMPROVE14E:NT TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, deems it necessary and expedient that the improvement hereinafter described, be made; NOW, THEREFORE, notice is hereby given that the City Council will hold a public hearing on said improvement at the following time and place within the said City: Date and Time: May 1,1980 at 7:30 P.M. Location: Council Chambers of the City Hall, 1380 Frost Avenue The general nature of the improvement is the construction of streets, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, watermains, and all necessary appurtenances (Public Improvement Project 79-11) in the following described area: That area lying generally east of a line 400 feet east of McKnight Road; west of a line 1700 feet from McKnight Road; south of County Road "D"; and north of a line 800 feet from County Road "D". The total estimated cost of said improvement is $346,933. It is proposed to assess every lot, piece or parcel of land benefited by said improvement whether abutting thereon or not, based upon benefits received without regard to cash valuation. Persons desiring to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement should be present at this hearing. This Council proposes to proceed under the authority granted by Chapter 429 M.S.A. Dated this 3rd day of April, 1980. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk, City of Maplewood, Mn. Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes - all. c. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 80-4-83 WHEREAS, the proposed public improvement of the area lying generally east of a line 400 feet east of McKnight Road; west of a line 1700 feet from McKnight Road; south of County Road "D"; and north of a line 800 feet from County Road "D", Maplewood Project 79-11, by construction of streets, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, watermains, and all necessary appurtenances does not have any impact on the City Comprehensive Master Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, under the provisions of M.S. Section 462.356, City Council hereby waives the review of aforementioned project by the City Planning Commission. Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes - all. - 12 - 4/3 d. Mayor Greavu introduced the fo resolution and moved its WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare preliminary plans for the improvement of Gall Avenue by con- struction of streets, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, watermains, and all necessary appurtenances (Public Improvement Project 79-10); and WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid preliminary plans for the improvement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the City Engineer advising this Council that the proposed improvement on Gall Avenue by construction of streets, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, watermains and all necessary appurtenances (Public Improvement Pro- ject 79-10) is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to M.S.A. Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $64,775. 3. A public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1380 Frost Avenue on Thursday, the first day of May, 1980, at 7:30 P.M. to consider said improvement. The notice for said public hearing shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF HEARING OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT TO WHOM IT 14AY CONCERN: WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, deems it necessary and expedient that the improvement hereinafter described be made; NOW, THEREFORE, notice is hereby given that the City Council will hold a public hearing on said improvement at the following time and place within the said City: Date and Time: May 1, 1980 at 7:30 P.M. Location: Council Chambers of the City Hall, 1380 Frost Avenue The general nature of the improvement is the construction of streets, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, watermains and all necessary appurtenances Public Improve- ment Project 79-10 in the following described area: That general area bounded by McKnight Road on the west; by a line 400 feet east of McKnight Road on the east; by County Road "D" on the north, and by a line 500 feet south of County Road "D" on the south. - 13 - 4/3 It is proposed to assess every lot, piece or parcel of land benefited by said improvement whether abutting thereon or not, based upon benefits received without regard to cash valuation. Persons desiring to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement should be present at this hearing. This Council proposes to proceed under the authority granted by Chapter 429 M.S.A. Dated this 3rd day of April, 1980. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk, City of Maplewood, kin. Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes - all. e. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its 80-4-85 WHEREAS, the proposed public improvement of the area bounded by McKnight Road on the west; by a line 400 feet east of McKnight Road on the east; by County Road "D" on the north; and by a line 500 feet south of County Road "D" on the south, Maplewood Project 79-10, by construction of streets, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, watermains and all necessary appurtenances does not have any impact on the City Comprehensive Master Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, under the provisions of M.S. Section 462.356, City Council hereby waives the review of aforementioned project by the City Planning Commission. Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes - all. 6. Feasibility Study: Adele, Fenton and Walter Streets - Project 79-7 a. Manager Evans presented the feasibility study for Project 79-7. It is recommended that the City Council accept the report and schedule a public hearing for May 8, 1980. b. Councilman Nelson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 80-4-86 WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare preliminary plans for the improvement of the area from Adele Street to 500 feet west between East Shore Drive and Frost Avenue and the area from Adele Street to Phalen Place between Frost Avenue and Fenton Avenue (Public Improvement 79-7) by construction of streets, storm sewers, sanitary sewers, watermain and necessary appurtenances; WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid preliminary plans for the improvement Herein described: - 14 - 4/3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the City Engineer advising this Council that the proposed improvement of the area from Adele Street to 500 feet west between East Shore Drive and Frost Avenue and the area from Adele Street to Phalen Place between Frost Avenue and Fenton Avenue (Public Improvement 79-7) by construct- ion of streets, storm sewers, sanitary sewers, watermain and necessary appur- tenances is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to M.S.A. Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $241,140. 3. A public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1380 Frost Avenue on Thursday the first day of May, 1980, at 7:45 P.M. to consider said improvement. The notice for said public hearing shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF HEARING OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, deems it necessary and expedient that the improvement hereinafter described, be made; NOW, THEREFORE, notice is hereby given that the City Council will hold a public hearing on said improvement at the following time and place within the said City: Date and Time: May 1, 1980 at 7:45 P.M. Location: Council Chambers of the City Hall, 1380 Frost Avenue The general nature of the improvement is the construction of streets, storm sewers, sanitary sewers, watermain and necessary appurtenances in the follow- ing described area: The area from Adele Street to 500 feet west between East Shore Drive and Frost Avenue and the area from Adele Street to Phalen Place between Frost Avenue and Fenton Avenue (Public Improvement 79-7) The total estimated cost of said improvement is $241,140. It is proposed to assess every lot, piece or parcel of land benefited by said improvement whether abutting thereon or not, based upon benefits received without regard to cash valuation. Persons desiring to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement should be present at this hearing. This Council proposes to proceed under the authority granted by Chapter 429 M.S.A. Dated this 3rd day of April, 1980. - 15 - 4/3 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COU14CIL /s/ Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. C. Councilman Nelson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 80-4-87 WHEREAS, the proposed public improvement of the area from Adele Street to 500 feet west between East Shore Drive and Frost Avenue and the area from Adele Street to Phalen Place between Frost Avenue and Fenton Avenue, Maplewood Project 79-7, by construction of streets, storm sewers, sanitary sewers, watermain and necessary appurtenances does not have any impact on the City Comprehensive Master Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, under the provisions of M.S. Section 462.356, City Council hereby waives the review of aforementioned project by the City Planning Commission. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. 7. Hillcrest Development: Developer's Agreement a. Manager Evans stated Mr. Ernest Christianson, Hillcrest Development, had requested to be heard by Council concerning his disagreement with a portion of the developer's agreement for the Hillcrest Improvements. b. Mr. Christianson spoke concerning the disagreement regarding the developer's share of the cost for the improvement. Councilperson Joker moved to extend the meeting past the 11:30 P.M. deadline. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu; Councilperson Joker, Councilman Anderson and Nelson. Nays - Councilman Bastian. C. Following lengthy discussion, Councilman Bastian moved to refer the matter to staff to reoort back by Mav 15. 1980 and that the Priory be notified reeard service and improvements to their property. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. 8. Assessment: Valley Branch Watershed a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mayor Greavu moved to deny payment of the special a the Valley Branch Watershed District for storm sewer im Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes - all. - 16 - 4/3 9. Accounts Payable a. Councilman Bastian moved that the accounts (Part I - Fees Services Expense Check No. 004116 through Check No. 004158 - $68,282.82; Check No. 005177 through Check No. 005288 - $132,088.40: Part II Payroll - Check No. 23800 through Check No. 23932 - $51.892.43) in the amount of $252.263.65 be paid as submitted. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. 10. Minnesota Public Works Association Conference - Director of Public Works 11. Nation Conference - City Clerks a. Mayor Greavu moved to deny both applications for travel and training. Motion died for lack of a second. b. Councilman Nelson moved to approve the applications for travel and training Association Conference at Brainerd, Minnesota, May 15and 16, 1980 and for Citv Clerk to attend the National Clerks Conference at Toronto. Canada. Ma Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - Councilperson Juker, Councilmen Ander- son and Nelson. Nays - Mayor Greavu and Councilman Bastian. 12. Final Plans and Specifications - Howard and Larpenteur Storm Sewer a. Councilman Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the City Council on February 28, 1980, plans and specifications for Larpenteur Avenue/Howard Street Storm Sewer, Maplewood Project No. 75-6, have been prepared by or under the direction of the City Engineer, and he has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COU14CIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and. made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper (and in the Construction Bulletin) an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published three times, the first time at least three weeks before date set for bid opening and shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered by the Council at the time and date selected by the City Engineer, at the City Hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, for 5% of the amount of such bid. - 17 - 4/3 3. The City Clerk and City Engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. 4. The advertisement for bids shall be in substantially the following form: ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS The City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, will receive sealed bids for the construction of the following approximate quantities: 1900 L.F. of 12" through 18" Storm Sewer and Appurtenances 430 C.Y. Common Excavation within the City limits on the basis of cash payment for the work. Bids will be received until 2:00 P.M. on the 6th day of May, 1980, at the Municipal Building, 1380 Frost Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota, at which time and place all bids will be publicly opened, read aloud and considered. Proposals must be placed in a sealed envelope with the statement thereon indicating proposal for bid contained within and addressed to the City of Maple- wood, Minnesota. Proposals shall be submitted to the City Clerk on or before the above stated time. Proposal is for the furnishing of all labor, equipment and materials and performing all work in connection with the above stated construction. Proposal forms, including specifications, are on file in the office of Barr Engineering Company located at 6800 France Avenue, South, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55435. Copies of the documents may be obtained by depositing $25.00 with the Engin- eer. The amount of deposit for one set of documents will be refunded to each actual bidder who returns the plans and documents in good conition within ten days after the opening of bids. All bids must be accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, in an amount equal to five per cent (5%) of the total bid, conditioned that if the bidder is the successful bidder he will enter into a contract in accordance with said bid and will furnish such performance bonds as are specified. No bidder may withdraw his bid for at least thirty (30) days after the scheduled closing time for the receipt of bids, without the consent of the owner. The City Council reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive irregularities and informalities therein and further reserves the right to award the contract in the best interest of the City. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. /s/ Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk, City of Maplewood, Mn. Ayes - all. - 18 - 4/3 13. Proclamation on Census a. Mayor Greavu proclaimed the following: WHEREAS, the Twentieth United States Decennial Census of Population and Housing was sent out on April 1, 1980; and WHEREAS, all the residents of the City of Maplewood are to be enumerated in this census; and WHEREAS, the information collected in the census serves many useful purposes, among which are apportionment of representation in Congress and other legis- lative bodies, measurement of the economic well-being of communities and their inhabitants, allotment of certain Federal and State tax revenues and other finan- cial aid to our communities, determination of future needs for public services, and numerous other useful purposes; and WHEREAS, the accuracy and completeness of the census for the City of Maple- wood will determine its population rank among other communities of the country; NOW, THEREFORE, I, John Greavu, Mayor of the City of Maplewood, do hereby urge and implore all residents to cooperate fully during the month of April with those who are charged with the responsibility of this most important work. Dated this 3rd day of April, A.D. 1980. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS Councilman Bastian moved to strike Items K-1 through 9 from the Agenda. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 10. Tour by Staff a. Councilperson Juker feels it would be worthwhile for the Council with Staff to tour the areas of the City where we are having problems. b. No action taken. 11. Health Officer Monthly Report a. Councilperson Juker would like a monthly report from the Health Officer similar to the one the Fire Marshal submits each month. b. Staff stated the Health Officer is in the process of preparing such a report. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS None. M. ADJOURNMENT 12:30 A.M. City Clerk - 19 - 4/3 TY OF IvADLEFOOD A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A 9 L E DATE 05-01.80 PAGE C H F' C K A M 0 U N T A C L I tl A N U R P 0 S E 004 4 NHSCVo 7 :7 Ll SU 0:: OFFICc STATE OF I-11 I N NJE S 0 T A P*rr_-*R*A* OED PAYABLE A N 0 - C 0 Nll'R 1" 3 IJ T]". 0 N S P ER A 4 2 410E S T ATE 0 F M T N N 0 T A -S' R A ,SE Y , C, T Y CONCILIATION A /R PARAMEDIC (d' U, 4 7 AND - CON. A. Ot R A 4 2 10 - 4 6 4 4 fJJ, I -N N T AT ASS UPER, 0 ,, ,0S T EPUTY: F E G I S T rj 4 10.8 60, 3 7 5 V A LLTE Y T 0 UR s -F -I-E7 E S o S';-_ R V F Y FE GALS GETAWAY C 04199 F,84s 87 RAL LIFE CONN GENE INS S GO 0 t4 T UTT .16 ONS.tINSURANCE 04 2 0 -N N 'S3 T A T E' T R,.E A �,-5U ty . ... 91 E? 0 S I T S 0 Y:' P"'G.1 24.4e67 -CNN GE H R A L L I I NS CO 3 U r T C) S . c 0 N T R v IN S UIRA + N Cl 11.014 45*00 POST A S T E R 0 S T A ry.- 04 2 C 0' ef 4 5. 6 a 11 MINN STATE TREASSUFER 0 E P Si T S z - C -E P U T Y R E G I S. T v 1 4 2 C S S E V I GEE J 5 2 :C-F NN S C U Sr C K REPORT COPIES-REIMB. -UTY G I q T !0` 4 2 0% 4- 22* 00 TPE�-SSURER OEPOSITS-DE' .INN S A EE :- ' Q42 0 c_,: 420*00 GEOFFREY OLSON TcAVEL + TRAINING 0 E F 48 F A—R -E -rr R T,,91-S T -Ci 5'( R -0 fi 0 M p A..f A : � 1..:...� U 'S PAYA3L'--* 2 1 5 475*25 mllN TEAM.--OS LOCAL 320 UN I CN. L. P 0'%13 Li JC42C-7 7 94 OF S T AT c M I N N E S JT A CON" ?B 4 -C e 3,771*30, STATE OF I-11 I N NJE S 0 T A P*rr_-*R*A* OED PAYABLE A N 0 - C 0 Nll'R 1" 3 IJ T]". 0 N S P ER A 4 2 7 9 5-1-8 97 S T ATE 0 F M T N N 0 T A -S' P Ea R A -AY A L AND - CON. A. Ot R A 4 2 10 2 1. 00 V N C fR' - KE PREVENTION T TR AiN '11 N, G in I 1-40 4.2 F Y FE COURT JUDGET 1-1ENT. 5 9 3 5 -N N 'S3 T A T E' T R,.E A �,-5U ty . ... 91 E? 0 S I T S 0 Y:' P"'G.1 w 42 1 % 18 c 1101 1 0 0 1 L L C R CEST MI 0 AMT--R I CA FEED I T P A Y A L'?? 0 E F 48 F A—R -E -rr R T,,91-S T -Ci 5'( R -0 fi 0 M p A..f A : � 1..:...� U 'S PAYA3L'--* 2 1 5 475*25 mllN TEAM.--OS LOCAL 320 UN I CN. L. I i �p A C C 0 U N T S FADE GE ^`*v CF vApLFt-\00c P A Y A -1 L E OATE G5-11-80 r- 2 I CHECK4 A M 0 U N T C L A I M A N T 40 U R 1-:1 0' S E ' N EO. -P 0 ? C 42 1 1 6.'. , 261 5 0 CITY, CTY GRECIT UN I N REOIT U, 41 O O A Y A u lj)L+ 2�8* 76 A F S C M E LOCAL 27 UNION D UF S PAYA3L � AND-FAIR SHARE FE PAYA1 21 p 4 5 1 3 V E' LOCAL 1056 UNICN DUE".S; P A Y 24'4 C 1 , 8 0 n M I tiN S i Ai 'E TR'tASSSURER A SHARE -FA SHARE FEES P A YA: -3 0 G RAMSF-Y PTY CONG, L N 0 0 4 2 75 03 — T T Y Ri: -POSI 0 U I 0014 219 L, X37.95 VINN COMI OF REVENUE MI INCCME TAX PAYABLE 004 2. 2 01 145 0 0 ROSEMAR1 KAN WAGE OF-DUCTI ONS. PAYARL" u C' 4 2 2 1 -2 c H T '4 ER RI LLLCcTST MIDAI W A. G. E L'. 'r . AYA81 0 DUCTI E 10 N S P TR + TRAINING POSTAGE•9 INSURANCE 0 .4 2 2 624*50 FINN STAT E TR EA S S U F. E R DEPOSE T S-0 t EPU T Y I , REGIST* C.' 42 RAMSEY CO CHIEFS CF POLICE 'T ' RAVEL + 7 AINING 24'4 C 1 , 8 0 n M I tiN S i Ai 'E TR'tASSSURER S EGI S T 0 E PO SI TS 0 EP UT Y -3 0 G RAMSF-Y PTY CONG, L N 0 0 4 2 75 03 — T T Y Ri: -POSI 0 U I 4 2 491*45 tj I RE NN STATE R 4 E 204 t0 MN REC + PARKS ASSCC TRAVEL T'?AINING 4 2 2 5 4 1.8 UNITEO PAP�CE-L SE'-m'-"VICE F E ES S V I C E- I NC TR + TRAINING POSTAGE•9 INSURANCE �I NN S'T A TE T S U R DEPOS"' T 1--C EPUT Y -G " R A. S. , 8 C- 0 AR 0 OF WATER COVIIJ -9 FEES SEA - VICE -3 0 G RAMSF-Y PTY CONG, L N 0 0 4 2 75 03 56. 20 eL UE. . CR OS S P— L U SHI HEALT A, INS P A T A3 L A 0 —CION —jPU'Tj0NSq1'4SURA. C 04 2 34 1 137. TRAVE-LWAY I NC TR + TRAINING "'0 0 q .. .. S-C F-DU T.Y 1-R, - G I S T' , G 4 - it 2 58;s 30 V I N N . R u STAT E 7 Sa 0 4 '232 254oC2 N �C 0 MA OF R E N UE FPL + OIL U 0 5 0u POST' MASTER P E A E X P E t 4 S E - ---- -- Our 4 2 3 -3 0 G RAMSF-Y PTY CONG, L N R P A'R A M Lf- D L C A J 0 4 2 3 ... 4 8 0 G ' tA HAEL BAH T TF A V E 1- + N 14 G A T P A Y A B L E DATE 05-91-80 PAGP 4 1 - 3 Y OF *IA WOO 0 -A G C 0 U A T S j< 4 A M 0 U N -T C L A 1 M A N T P U R P 0 S E 2 7 24*00 IS c o T T BOYD T-P A V EL 'T Al N 14 G c 238 r 48 Ou 0I AN E CORGORAN TRAVEEL AIL N I N G u n C 4 2 3 5 c l 2 4 * 0 0 C A -'Av-fi ER I N KNUTSON TRAVEL R A, I N N1 G 00 42 4 10 24 0 0 JR i A 0 S CI H :':Tif -A V EL. TRA ' T RA INING 0 4 24 1 24900 CA NI STACY TRAVEL 0 '01424 6, 0 4 90 ?INN S T R E ASO U ER -D E PO STTS-C'PUTY R'-GIST* 48 57,9752o9a N , E , �q.- s : G 5 A RY X- E N C I T U RIE 'So SINCE LAS T, C 0 U NC I L M EETIN G w 3 v 2 6 ANTHCNY G * GAHANES TRAVEL + TRAINING - 7 U U w.�. -U UL — A p —p y ---7 - N _Tff — N 41N C E M ATi7 R I AL S* 452 e77 CAPITOL SUPPLI GO ER I AL M Al N T N ANC MAT s 11 AND-ZSIMA L. T 10 J- S 00545" 'T Y OF VAPLE�00'0 A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A 3 L E P 4 DATEE 05 J 1- 8 ' AGE C H 'E- C K` ' A M 0. U N T C L A I M N T U R P 0 S E • . A S S 38 41 A G -G + PLBG UA R IUS 'H FEESt p �JC5438 U P ME N T S U PP: L Irl E;4 I AUTOCON INDUS TRIIES INC R-Po + MA .4 T UTILITY 3 10 5 4 3 , X3 , 25 AUTOMATIC VOTING M Ar.-, 11 1 NE S U P P L I E 0 U 1' 10 M r-E- N T 2 r-, 15 4 4 0 48-3 6 0 JAMES BAHT F E;: t SERV "C 7 2 9 2, 7 COLLINS E*LE CT RI CA L CONS T TQ. I NSPECT. H.- 7 a 9 OARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOUG I Nc FEES, CONSULTING C 4 4 2 23970 OATTERY WAREHrUSE SUPOLI­319 Vr"- H C L E q 4 4. 320 0 0 A G 0 E ' N PROOUCTS GO MAI NT_-NANC 14 A T R I AL S - o" 1640 E C IO "'Ir C Y S t: SUPPLT NT 00544r5 3 9 1 R D CRONIN INC SUPPL T P S "QUIPM-ENT r.5 4 4 6 3 7 3 2 L U M tE N F E L D S CRT N ET CO SUPPLIC..) P 13-447 4 11 o -- a w ---- N 0 UY - Sl 6:-:' E N ;R N'G F Y ES N T AND-MAJ. ENANCE MATi-RIAL j C YER F 0 R 0 i�L E L4UERK" UICK REP,* + !4 A TN T VEHIC 5 4 4 9 -.9 3 v 2 6 ANTHCNY G * GAHANES TRAVEL + TRAINING - 7 U U w.�. -U UL — A p —p y ---7 - N _Tff — N 41N C E M ATi7 R I AL S* 452 e77 CAPITOL SUPPLI GO ER I AL M Al N T N ANC MAT s 11 AND-ZSIMA L. T 10 J- S 00545" qo35 CA-FI T CL RUBBER STAMP CO O SUP - L TS il- F I CE 13 r4-5 454.. 4 ? 2 3 W I L L I XV A S S t j N G T'P A V R A 'l N Ill ... 55 5 1 -A C N T U Rl Y CAMEK U P ME N T S U PP: L Irl E;4 I 5 4 5 E C A SPIRI NGS -C C ----------- F E E S E rm" V WATER COOLER 5 4 5 7 2 9 2, 7 COLLINS E*LE CT RI CA L CONS T r # 'O- GS + A T N T B M-A I INT U + T AN'r ITY 0,F VAPLE�sOOD 15's 64 A C .0 U N T S P A Y A 8 L E P '- . OAT" 05-31--8G A G . ?- 5 c HE- c l< �A M C U N T C L A I M A N T U R P 0 S n 25 N T, C OPY., EQUIPM lNC 3 U P P LT.- u P M W4 1,% 5 45 8 %- _ x: 05 4 51 S 33 *47 CPCSSRCADS FO RD S u P -l:DL.L PS V HICLE C, 5 4 6 -3 3 7" CE NN I qlj S CUSICK TPAVEL + "RAINING r 05 t j 46 lro .1 72 UALCO C OR P supl- JANJl`T0'_,lAl 005474 450, CISPATCH P I ON E EP S S SUBSCRIPTT a tj 'Z+Mi- m 0 c 0 S H .0 �;4E 2 -- ---- - C A V I D H O R . 14 130 1 C RICHARO C 0m, GFR TR AV EL T R A I N 1 .4 G CQ5 464' 34 3 I M I C K A113SOC ING SUPPLIES OFFICE REP + MAI T* �:GUIPMENT _ BANK OF ST P A UL F S S v I SAFEKEEPING ACCT. 5 4 6 + V E H T F0LLAN'lSd9-r--- STrIE"EL CORP " LAND TMPROVEMENT �" t, - - - --------------------------- r% -741E7 H 0 W I E ".3 LOCK + K�Y RV� I C G M C TRUCK CENTIER :S U P P L.;. E- VEHICLE -St --- S t-E S AR t C A S l�= L I S ROGRAM a27 C 5 9 0 0 SALTER M G;":IS<---Ly7R FF.P.Si sg�-RVICE 4 6 9 15, NOTARY PUBLrC FEE 0 G R A M <z I 'I co 0 1 T C C . 4 7 15's 64 �FATR ICIA GIL3 -A. 7 AND-FE-St Sc 'V c E x DUPLICATE BRIDGE 8 -0 4 2 GLAD STON- LUMEHER MART N A" C M A TE R. I AL 'S MAINTE N 5 4 71 %- — -------- G 5 - 1 � .0t N SUP p M E L5 47* 2 4 <3 LC, 4 G c 0 0YEAR spPzvlClE STORt F H . ... .. RE P + MAI V V E H ICLES 005474 450, GOPHER 3�!:-�ARING GO SUPPLIES9 V E'H 1 C L E L �5 -- ---- - C A V I D H O R A v L 'NIRNT7777777 0 -54 -7 E 19 8 1 TN R A I N G.': 0 0 5 4 7 7 8 0 f0l 0 H WL P 7 T PACKARO REP + MAI T* �:GUIPMENT L S + V E H T 4 7 1 7 19 H 0 W I E ".3 LOCK + K�Y RV� I C S u V H T CL JL x A C C 0 U N T S IF A Y A 3 L E GATE 05-201-80 PAGE 6 c RE- c K A M 0 U N 7 C L A I 4 A N T P U P P 0 s E `". 5 10 00 ' . N S CORP 3US MACH S U P ? L I E S OFF 95 7 8 0 SL U :. PP. INT A N 0 - + MA P� 5 - 48 1- 25o 00 J J TP.OPHY"31 + SPORTS SUFRIL.IES9 0 F FIE CE 2 4 4 1 JCHNSON PLASTICS SUPOL 0 U T M N T 1:5.4 '00 7 5 9 7 I CH AR. -11 "OESC HTEF7R TPA N I N G A V p'T R ... ']'C 5 4 8 1 7 ro KNOX LUM3ER CCMPANY E Rl' Al S M AINT E N A N CE I N TEN A NC, E M A T L -72,,,,140 V. U N I C S 10 A L E IR, VI GE _. 5 4 8 4 IOU 182*95 KOKESH suppl T" "OGRAM L .. S, 2 0 "' J' E 0 A R 0: 'NA EAU AND-EQUIPMliNT 0 T HER 4,,c33, 75 . IS 8ANNIGAN TRUSS CO LAND A 1 Eti N T S t A KE SANITATICN FE - q Sr 'J IC E TRASH REMOVAL 48 i -N l'i I..f &- t CC 0 LANO CF LAKE-S WREST ASSN SUBS CR IPT I "NS+ ME- M P,--RSHI P 7 ir 4.88 t. 4 !�7 3 vF,5 91 J LA NC- RCGER W L E'E SUPPLT P-ROGRA4j+.::. t R A 14 G T P, A VE IN' ;2 05 4 C G3 C7 MAPLE- WOOD PLBC- HTG I M MA TER IALS 95 7 8 0 SL U :. PP. INT A N 0 - + MA P� .4 A� -21984 MAPLEWOOD R, E V Ir E W PU131 "SHING L I QU T -QUIFMENT 0 5 4 93 15* 15 V I LL +---4-)-/CAVIS COMPANY SUPP OFFICE 7 M, N ASSOC OF H IV EF 0 IR. I T 1 4 T SUBSC' PT.LCNS+P M 95 7 8 0 SL U :. PP. INT rQUI SUPOLr F- M N ' 5 4'0 2,660oCC H T W I NF Ir"_ L C A TC HELL FEE'S SERV lu t :AN.,3—L'GAL+. 1:5.4 '00 7 5 9 7 I CH AR. -11 "OESC HTEF7R TPA N I N G A V p'T R ... 5 49 8 2 8 CC NCTIORCLA INC SUPPL.TLES9 E. M, - N T -72,,,,140 V. U N I C S 10 A L E IR, VI GE F E E'S SE R c ANIMAL CONTROL 2 0 "' J' E 0 A R 0: 'NA EAU -U N.I F 0' M, S + C I OTH I t4iG 'A 5 5 0 3 45s5C NOPTH- '-'N BAT-"'PRY CORP SU PDIT�: St : V H I C L V 150 *00 -_3 S INC N ov �A SS 0 C (;ONSL,, TANT CC s c 0 N s u , L G -5. 5 a 15 1 17 RAVSEI( COUNTY TRE A SUREER' "Tq FUC T' ON C 0 "S 0 T H;7 P 0 N T �# � 3 01 2 7 E E N E E L L TEL C 0 - NORT H NS R ' TE "PHON' E LE C , r 50 6 7: 39 C, 0 STERN e E L TEL CO NOFTHN" i - TEL� PH ON 5 1 C 84 *58 P 0 W E R f-I A K E + ?'- -" INC 'V To I E'Q U I,-' M E NT REP* + MATN 7 T T N . . ..... .. ..... . N T SUPP L QUIPM 0055 2 17 RAVSEI( COUNTY TRE A SUREER' "Tq FUC T' ON C 0 "S 0 T H;7 P 0 N T �# � q 005513 564.E; J. T OFFICE PROOUCTS - OFF S U L'il-' S A N 3 - E Q 01 M NT OFFICE 0 513 S 1 4 56 4 J 2 T 0 F F CE F R 0 0 U C. T e3U P "Ll S OF F- CE' ...... u 0 0 – — — 6 – rrric 5 � R � + F U y tti SOFTBALL 5 1 E 2, t 2 9 4 6 T A SCHIFSKY S 1 NC MAINT=NANC- N A T E R I A L S 7- 9 0 u L J 'SCH U"' T R CO -01 T C U.P. S t OF F"w C --T—r - 0 R L L T OUTSIDE l'-NIGINEER ING FEES 4*00 £:f0 .0 J R A I N I N G SKA4 MAN TRAVE1 + 0 5 15 2 1 L . ..... [4 ,, 345.5, 25 T A I N I N G C I 'T Y.':. 0 f 'S T PAU AVEL + q T U 1 1 T S Y CF PAPI E�000 A C C 0 P A Y A 9 L E 0 A TE 8 05-01-80 PAGE C H C, K* A M 0 U N T G L A I M A N T P U R P 0 s MAINT* A N 0 RACIO R' fE N'- ALL 1 `1 T M E N 2 1 0 -0 'S T P A U L' R. E! I A L .0 J 1 0 05 5 22 lie 62 Gr"� E G 0 R Y L STAFNE SU BSCC I PT T ONS + MEM BER S HI10 L AND TRAV T R A I t\ I N G `163 94 T At-3 U L A N G S E t"-l('V 3 URE A U P2 5 5 2 s -3 P TSH ING S;7'O V ISE . .... —ES F. AND DATA 0 2 55 24 18,o 27 `7 A RG E T ST O R F S INC SU = L E'S 0ROGRAM - HER coNs COSTS 5 5-1 2 c o 5-04 69 CH.N.1 CAL : VRO UCUCTIONS ol HOWARD LARF SEWER 0 . 0 55 2 A I t4 14 A N C M A T R.1 A S R TCLL co u E 15 all H MA V � T S E RV 14*85 T IN CITY FILTER SERV IN FEES, SERVICE AIR FILTER CLEANING .. 5 2R __ . 2 R llls40 U-N O 'IFPHIS U�4L NITED UN I -MS CLOTHING F 4' si5 4 .. I R T U:P P;,INTING Go S U S ES OFFI C" ..I p I �- NANCE ' RIALS ';553!1 79*20 %ALOOR PUMP M A T Q� t- + EGUIPMENT M A I N T 4- R UCP W EB E R 30OKS PER"I001CALS JAN R I c 0 1.3 5 9 3 2 184 979 WEST I NGHOUS ELI�'-c 3. 4 CUAN.1- i� J WlLl..IAt-;S I TRAVEL + TRAINING 3 ELLANECUS': 55 3 4 lilcc*7C- x &R. OX CORPORATION A I 0 X: XER AN 1) .__.__.�; � � � .�.�.._..__�- _.__._..:. 1,186 �ERO CC;.PO.RATION XEROX nu- *.Jl 5 5-4 6 �- i.; 2 8 E- 0; X E ROX CORPORATION X-t K x P, 0 x 01 5 5- 34 7 8 ,9-8 4 00,103 C*U M OIL GO INC 'Y u ' OIL. -38 901 u WALT17R PARTZ A L A R-1 E S W A Gf:*S TEMP* C-55313 9000 ETH CASS DAY ELIZABIL T' + SAI .A RIES WA GES , TE P n r rz I -q If's a 00 T Ot Y M A B -c R, 0 -p S S A' AR LE S WA G -S :T r t A ,� 3 L E � � C U N T S � Q � DATE 05- 01.80 PAGE 9 Y OF fi'APL�w00D .. _ C, HE GK.� A M O U N T C L A I M A � P U R P C S THERESA FLAH� RTY s AR IE S $ A ... EM A. JA SA' I=S WAGES, TE .. 05G .� 0 . ....... . MARTHA H093 S - - .AR SA .A�'I - WAGES ' �`���� ANN - _ - - - --S ��lAGE�S� SALARI -_ 545 -� - 1750 KF�.ST1 �; CULZ= SA + , NA �E S9 � R A NO M A C 7777 7 TF 4 U J J i J U L I a.� _. V U i 4 .. SALARIES 'W AGES T - 0 R S R A� X1 SALARI`S + WAGES, TES . 55 c -•- 9 .u.�: A ,.ICHA RADA _ _ ---- -- S A. A I S w A G E , � M? 0 { OcE ONDE- U �S LAIS WAGES, _ Ifb Sd J All r: A "r- ANN6AU R SALAP.IES WAGES TE S �� G S A <' T 4 S7 " ' r N0 Y VI- T.0R i� .A _. GALS GETA 5 2 g G C ONTINENTAL -L C C S E LTE A F --- SUPP 0 FFI C E - - - ---- - -�-�-^ 2 to t- 4 �(�} ;�+�j ! p + {� {�''�` }� CU S T A G 0. SUPPLI F T Ct' ' ^555G kDAY GALS GETAWAY �3�� FGhOLAS SH ST U ;�1 'Fv 1S CI THING - .,. _� --- 5 5 5 ..� t N AU70 �SALVACE �C��. . OF 9 A SALE l 7_ M T Q R -.. --- A --- �. 0 C A L ' 0 K- E r 001. 25 00 ri •� EFEr� EO TRAV TFAV TRAINING a 55E s ..... - - R . 5 �, .� ,: � AN H .. ,: A _ F t N 0 GETAWA ALA - ..._..... - - ~-Mfi5 S _F U GALS GETAWAY 3 I 7 3 �- c M I T H T R A N S F R C O R P EGUIP' ENT, OTH _— � � r t ` I 49 7 ell? C HEC K S WRITT _. T -07 A L CF: i C C TOTAL �. 539 X 95 INDICATES ITEM PAID FOR BY RECREATION FEES ,t ATE 0 4-25-80 NET 2 2-17-v5O 226* / 224,42 2 50 -*00 883 . 93 41 08 33.3,088 58 ,o R5 795,9 34 3.! +7 348o%)5 68,36 X 35. 27 93. 90 79,* ? 0 2 77 , 3 8 15051 1 26*.34 139.75 143*38 3 1 () 0 ()'7 514,o98 4 1 , 0 ,) 4 65.96 1 63,45 157o35 62 5*66 317 0 � - 4 450 - 170 c�,3 4630 '-) 4 -, 520,i37 169,2_6 511,065 5-72 * 18 475 o2C 5 36. 6 9 539--)l 565"+8 6 2 4,o 1 3 5 8. Z 6 4 * _'.i 9 16 � 52 b,9 si 0 4 86 c14 537 434 .1.1. 502.99 460,65 635*83 2 59 362.65. 295* 72 294*97 3 06*96 X11 * 62 72 65 267*24 2 31.1 4 720-17 ',2 3 2 2 4 4,o 6 5 7 7 *;) 8 28 ,96 A 83 a 17 14-1 *31 392 *46 155. 5 548 /,9,6.()4 CITY CF MAPLE GATED 04-2-5-80 CHECK REGISTER P AYROLL GROSS cL AIMANI , NC-o r N CRVAN G ANOE95AON 250,vOO 0 2 5 0 24C bf) .6 1 C4gy W BAST'S AN 2 4C62 j u-IHN C GIREAVU 325 *04 .25 24 F RANCES L iu , ,<ER 256*00 6 3 . 2 4C64' 2 4065 EARL i N L 's c N B ARRY 9 EVANS 1 , 1 536,*92 2 4C6'6 2 406-7 \ R LEWIS- TEUT LAURIC-L EE 496-a15 60,00 24068 ROGER P CEL.Flt�CCC J 222-989 24C69 2400 CANIEL f FAU'T ' A R LI NE J HACjEN. 751,3 8 522 * 00 24071 240 2 7 ALANA K VATHEYr* ANNE m RICHARUS -72,50 1 , v 142*00 24G-7 3 LUCILLE E 1- 58 4,3 1 C 24C74 24075 PHYLLIS GRE 0 SELVCG 584o31 440-31 24 07? BE-TTY LGRgA I NE S . v I E'TOR 1 85,92 240 24C78 J EANNE L S cHACT ALFREO i PELCCUIN 701*85 16 1*50 2 4 C 0 n 4C79 o U G KLEIN i A v ES, EY TERRANCE C Ril- 155*13 966.o46 24082 C 8 1 CAVIO L ARNOLE H J\TCHISCN 84 8,31 969 6,9 2 4 C 8 3 JCHN ANT11CNY G CA i-ANES 848.31 24C84 240.85 CALE K 'CLAUS" YE;' METH V C CLLMS. 970,v 15 11 126,b23 .24C86 24C87 CENNIS j CELNCrNT RICHARP) C cRECER 111 13.,05 848 . 31 24cp;8 24CS9 RAYVCJ\�o E FERNOA t- NORtJAN L GREL-N gs 6,77 AL 9 204,,31 24C910 24G91 THCt��AS L F.ArGENN M:\4 IN R H ALVJ E G 848o3l 888. 59 24 49? 2 4 � - CI A [- 1 4 S RT r LO V KCRTL i i HERC ONA 887 212-00 . 54 24C -94 24C'95 p J LANG J V-C N L1*y 1,051066 F07*69 24C96 24C97 JCHN I P, J AMES E NE_ B VETT IL Ell 8 7,69 80 848 24C,'98 24C99 RICH ARD IV MCESCHTER RA YVCNP) j MCR ELL 832* 9 49,o 38 24100 24101 p, C NELSCt\ 1 v F PELTIER A t 9 49 ,o 8 -11303,81 24102 2 4 1 C 3 v, I L LI j- A t-L ER R I CH AR C Vi S, C W SKAL1 M -.0 848*"l 848,31 24104 2410-5 C .CNALD CRE6CRY L ST AFNE VERNCN T STILL 807,69 807.,69 24 241 C A R \ E L t L T ST CCKT CN TI MCTHY J T LER 832 , 15 782.45 24 un 8 24109 E. R u (" E �j E B CUAN wILLIAPS 88 0,62 98 8,15 24110 24111 icsEPH A LAPPA CEOC�RAH A 13ASTYR * 40792 545,54 24112 24113 JAY 03E L FLAUGFER --,-<-E W PULIAE E 464.77 464.77 24114 24115 KAREN �j AREN A NELSON E c. m A T H 450,00 464,77 24116 21,1 1-7 j n, y S CCTT JULIE K EN JO ANNE V. Sy ENES 545,54 464o 77 24118 FI CHELE A TUCVNER 871,*38 24 119 24120 p C BECKER CENNIS s CuS ICK j p 126,23 887-a54 2 4 1 2 1 o 4vto v GRAF 24122 CYNTHIA J MORGM 3-71* 80 9 03 o 69 24123 RCGF--R W LEE 24124 JCN A VELANDER, c) 846,m 2 773*08 24125 CARCL V NELSCN 24126 E R AZSKAZCFF 887,54 8 71,38 CALE 24128 4127 VI CHAEL p RYAN RCBT-RT E VCk 1 A FRK 887 54 91 5,60 24129 2 1,130 JADES G YOUNcREN Et*'BERTq-CN 1 1 40.77 2,4131 J AMES ATE 0 4-25-80 NET 2 2-17-v5O 226* / 224,42 2 50 -*00 883 . 93 41 08 33.3,088 58 ,o R5 795,9 34 3.! +7 348o%)5 68,36 X 35. 27 93. 90 79,* ? 0 2 77 , 3 8 15051 1 26*.34 139.75 143*38 3 1 () 0 ()'7 514,o98 4 1 , 0 ,) 4 65.96 1 63,45 157o35 62 5*66 317 0 � - 4 450 - 170 c�,3 4630 '-) 4 -, 520,i37 169,2_6 511,065 5-72 * 18 475 o2C 5 36. 6 9 539--)l 565"+8 6 2 4,o 1 3 5 8. Z 6 4 * _'.i 9 16 � 52 b,9 si 0 4 86 c14 537 434 .1.1. 502.99 460,65 635*83 2 59 362.65. 295* 72 294*97 3 06*96 X11 * 62 72 65 267*24 2 31.1 4 720-17 ',2 3 2 2 4 4,o 6 5 7 7 *;) 8 28 ,96 A 83 a 17 14-1 *31 392 *46 155. 5 548 /,9,6.()4 5 * C I T CF MAPLEINOOC ' CHECK REGISTER °- PAYRCLL GATED 04- -25 -80 DATE C'4-25 -80 CHECK NC. CLAIMANT GROSS NET r: 24132 ALFRFO C SCHACT 953.0 ..5 4 592,83 24.133 CLIFFCRO J MCTTAZ 64061 5814 24134 PAtRC'ELLA N MCT TAZ 682..86 446.68 24335 SILL IAN L BITTNER 1, 264 *23 792.77 2 4 1.36 JAfvFS G EL I AS 790.62 440. 73 24137 LECTA C CSWALC 55615 351.79 24138 CENNIS L PECK 813034 465.77 24139 PAUL 8 WEBBER 92619 545.42 24 140 JUO I TH A WEGWERTH 19.1.60 1.58.3.1. - 24 141 IGCR V FEJDA 6744 31 45577 l 24142 +HALTER M GEISSLER 790*62 496456 { 241.43 JAMES T GESSELE 693x70 462,94 24 144 24145 KENPxETH G HA I CER RCBERT F I4PSON 958.62 166.40 ;. r 24146 WI LL �%ILL:IAN C CASS 617.54 978,46 4010 #2 503.43 24147 RONALO L FREBERG 640,00 414,00 24148 RONALD J HELEY 696.80 446.+5 24 149 RAYMOND J KAECER 72 7 498 469.'12 24150 MICHAEL R KANE 701*44 307.1.7 24151 CCRALC W. MEYER 757 .04 38.3 *02 24:152 ARNGLC H PFARR 714.21 466 * 86 24153 EOtNARC A REINERT 703,o33 450* 18 24154 ClECRGE J RICFARC 703 *33 431.87 24155 HARRY TEVLIN JR 766.03 540a88 -f; 24156 JPFFRT.Y P GR IENANN 103395 102x14 24 157 C I LBE RT C LARCCHE 504.•92 339 X 33 24158 tv PAUL INE ADAf'S 679,85 43.3,71 F_. 24159 RUCCLPH R BARANKC 893 *54 535 *97 r, 2416C LCIS J BRENNER 576.23 20702.6 24161 BARBARA A KRUt #NEL 231 *00 134 *08 4162 R IAERT 0 CCEC-4RD 57693 433.24 24163 ROY G WARC 277465 27.23 24164 PYLES R eURK E 696 0 80 /402670 24165 CAV IC A GERivA IN 696.80 44210 0 24166 fvELVIN J GUSINCA 920x00 53342 24167 RCLANO 8 HELEY 696,80 458,15 24168 FENRY F KLAUS ING 696 s 80 -.496,o 24 169 REEL E SANTA 698 a 30 45947 y 2417C JOSEPH P PLANE 43 x 20 43 a 20 2 -ft 171. KRISTIN A ECKSTRCM 9100 9000 ►_� 24172 GARY CASSFCAY 9:000 90C 0 24173 CAVIL J WALDEN 9400 8,0 88 2417.4 BARBARA J SRUNEL.L 18.6 147.30 R 24 175 JANET P GE 7.97.00 22 1 *4 S ;. 2,4176 JAMES R NCKE 45443 40483 Y 24177 CHRISTINE SCUTTER 519 *20 353.57 24178 JULY V CHLEBECK 5560 25C *51 r 24179 THCNAS G EKSTRANC 67228 42.6028 24180 RANDALL - L JCHNSCN . 750029 469.53 =b F F 24181 NANCY J VISKELL 191060 144.86 i 24182 GEOFFREY W CLSCN 1., 133,69 62 3094 b! 24183--- G MILLER_ -- VOlD- - - - - -- 919.85 ---------- - 9 I a 60 24184 PAiRJCRIE CSTRCM 919085 590.55 24 185 ROBERT J WENGER 8050 522.57 24186 RICHARD J BARTFOLOM'E 710.40 ?9002 24187 CAVIL 8 EDSON 699s57 433.51 ;..., 24188 EOtiARO A NADEAI 77700 522.99 24189 LAVERN'E S NUTESCN lt023*50 39670 24190 CERALD C CWEN 710'40 47233 - 24191 V�ILL:IAM S THCNE 785.00 517 i2 24192 JOHN E M.ACCCN AL O 768 * 80 508 C{0 Y, 24193 CENNIS M MULVANEY 743.20 463o97 ` CFECK NUMBER 24061'THRU 24193. 90, 325, 31 50,693o79 PAYRCLL CATEO 04-- 25-80 r 24183 LEWIS G MILLER --- VO:�D - - - - -- ( 919.8 5) (591.60) 24060 JOSEPH B PRETTNER 1,196.00 774.28 24194 LEWIS G MILLER 274.49 202.71 24195 LEWIS G MILLER 498.82 398.14 du $% 93,844.77 51 s ,< Jam. �• �l -5 { MEMORANDUM TO City Manager FROM: Fi riance Director RE Paramedic Bi 1 l p-Application for Cancellation DATE: April 22 , 1980 An application for cancellation of paramedic ambulance service charges has been received for Roy Walbridge. This individual was taken to the Detoxification Center on August 13, 1979. The first billing of $35 for ambul services was dated September 1. 1979. Subsequently, the .attached arpl i cati on dated September 29th was received. The application was not referred .to the Council at that time as a medicare and medical assi stance cl a.im was in the process of being submitted at that time. Recen��,ly, the Ci was not i fi ed that both medicare and medical assistance had rejected the cl aim, Consequently, this application is now being submitted for the Counci 1 ' s review and action. cc: Public Safety Director 1 er t,.r d J_ a a a r APP LICATION FOR CANCI�LLATION OF PARATIED A SERVICE CIWZ'CES : I NAME OF APPLICANT: x ADDRESS OF APPLICANT: STATE ZIP C , C C irpy `7 wwi PATIENT'S NAME 1. . DATE OF SERVICE: -� 4y 6 e;q TOTAL CAcES : .D t �' REASON FOR REQUEST: 1. Financial Hardship (fill out reverse side): ta ��• s r� � t � I {; e .de.��.••x' 1. E �i ` � � ����tt �:.J �,- `� � .o�.rs. - `s...l......,....: �' I s � �q � � � i � f 'tom..,, '� ., � Y +" �,. S•�' � �.. � � 9 � +.i6�..aw..+r..ci:. _-� `wA.... ��,�. v � � / +� •� �� ��...•�` p�R6 :.3 \, , "y.,s ! ...,.jrg � R� rP �. i\ lk . :r.�...�.w,,,"•. -.l �ti,�¢�•":.,.:. { � .._:�_.���...L�,..�..s.i�' , F- K ....:w:•..1w..:.,,v.::�4.....+ ••..f' �„�s...... = � �,:.�..�+. � r`� L ' ' �.Y.�' '. 4 �.�o „ � ! ..b ,- r'1:.�Yi� j � . ��,�'�•�i.vf n p E A j ' .�. • F v6+ ,:o-. : ."�. l v£" u r ' 1 Ls L �•' ,max .�� i v< ���. + { f I ' / .. i G "..� • rY J �.'� 1 j ' �' da pl ��f�f11 r +� X)� � � �� ' � 1 e t,.,,r°�1' �.. 7'q\ s+n..x++v -'' r� ti r j' w r � •t a �y. � � { rt ('� "''; �% j � ^`• �._......n... �+ A. 1 . � Z'. r ....,._s�.P�.����4•.:..�.,.�.., R.�v -�,.'' �. - , ,L.a�' _., w- �� � ' . `. vA�e ,�yE,�,�,,,,.�.y�- S�.'�',,.�.. ,bC„ � /., ("i • s . . y ( �. � � .� �" �'� a r ! .� ° a ty��'•,,{�•• `R• � ,•ft; p � l Pk e f � ' �) .� / !, �R �, a g' �, ,r - �F.'s! ' � .+� � i � /a°�"!; '4,c' ••� -1.� L,.�.�w .sE'` D ' `°a�'�O ,..o..',�.i�°+�,. '�f .,. �a l�I�q �k� f'�� �..-7� ti6 c^. "4. "r c.r•�.�� `a... \ �y �I (�p�. 5 ' ! , 1 !+ ✓ ..,� {' • 1 j\ �/� qy(t,, � ( a. yy .l t♦ �•'p P ,J gam,. ,{( ( �� 1 , ,I.. )k ��'nli' `�� Y' �4_ i' ��N ��Mt' • J `�..��I , j. S�•: l,_�4 i�. �' ' Yr DJ -'V ♦ �� o r� e i �1= o r a o n I h a �e e �p� e o t h aY: a t o n s cr t��a�. the :. }. tr a nd accurate. Nwo' Oate: Al 1 ( D C, IV 1 `'!_l (1 I V I t \ I 1 1.,11 NI "I NCO ,L' nIca ally al rTC01 %,f0d from the followir)g sources by any Resident: eP Any Public Assistl i.Irluding but not S, 111cluding eOn7Missiolis, bonuses, limited to wel f w AMC, SS I, and o p and tips Ulle Ca r ipensation 0 Interest and Dividends 0 P and Anl)Uities, including PERA a Rental income and Social Security QusineSS P -- for self - employed 0 Estate or Trust income individuals,•incI Lid ing Farmers " Gains from the safc of ,roperty or 0 Payments received from properties being -sL cur itiEis sold on Contracts for Deed 0 VA E:dUcational Grants List all resid ents of your 110itsehold. Include yourself, i ii c 1 u Cie their ages an their incomes (i a rty) 1 } Income listed should 'nclUde all income which your household can reasonably expect to receive: during the t7ext 12 months. 2) "RESIDENT" rneans any .person, other than a renter, lining in the household for at least 9 months of - the year, or a person who is claimed as a dependent for infCorne tax' purposes. NAME OF AGE OF P 2S31DEN T RESIDENT CI a ,mil INCOME OF RESIDENT SOURCE OF INCWME. � :za' I ;';.C;;± 1 5r =ClUdin n?tntllo addre S, if arr,- ^ble.? . "cux Lit + . { `` T OTAL I N ��o M E- . p er month. ,.__. .,�.. _.. � ... p year f MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: HRA Annual Report DATE: April 1 5 , 1980 Please find enclosed a copy of the HRA's Annual Report (March, 1979 through March, 1980) . On April 8, the HRA accepted the document and requested Staff forward the report to the City Council for their approval. Act'. on by C aunnc 6 � � •F .rd {, f` � w ..1 y ; ,.. L. c ... +a+ a...s+ <.s.as...ms«a'.as.W► L • D a , t"i tr .• +, 1l araermo..+r.+axw a:u.:+a.»+►..e.u+.^. aen.yn.. .wmtM CI'T O F. 01 . MAPLI DD 'X'r OD, MINNESO'Ek M09 XT-4 NU MAPLEN .0 1-380 FROST A Y• rip HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY #77n A Cnr, March 31, 1980 Maplewood Cit Council 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood Minnesota 55109 Dear Council Members: Presented herewith is our annual report for the period from . March 1979 -to March 1980. ' cop of our record of atte ndance for this period is attached as Exhibit A. As y ou will note the vacanc for a meml)er from the Human Relations Commission which was created b the resi 30 i tion of Dwi Jessup, was f illed b the appointment of Maria 'Larsen,, D u r i r. cy the past year we have participated in two pro admiinis CD - ter ed. b the Metropolitan Counc-il Housino, and Redevelopment Authorit : A brief sunn.n.ar of these pro -Is as follows a. SECI'1'101� 8 RENTAL ASSISTANCE B resolution dated Februar 19-79, the Cit of 141aplewood 1 became the 33rd coul.,nitinit to join this pro which includes over 50 participatin communities. This pro which .Utilizes existin housin stock,, allows q ualified individuals to rent 51 housin in the moderate rent ran at a location of their choice. The individual pa a maximum of 25% of his income as rent, and the differ- ence between that sum and the actual rent is paid directl to the land- lord b HUD. The units remain in the private sector and on the tax roles. Staffin is provided b the Metropolitan Council with office space in the cit hall, furniture, telephone and buildin inspections provided b '.Maplewood, This y ear Maplewood had ill applicants certified and participatin in the pro (see Exhibit B for locations), and 55 1 additional on the I w a Itin list As noted in last y ear' s report,, it was f elt our past f ail- - ures to achieve our g oals -in this f ield were attributable to the method of priorit g iven to applicants under Metro HRA selection policies. Last summer these policies were chan to a s which addresses' concerns such as ours. This new polic will probabl not- have a si im- pact in the near future, however, unless there is an increase in the level of fundin expected, ­I'm" n M-1-- b. MINNESOTA I-IOUSING FINANCE AGLENCY HOUSING GRANTS A in Jul 1979 the Cit of Maplewood entered into an a I g reement. with the Met- ropolitan Council. to disburse $26,670 in g rants to improve resident pr . o­ pert f eli families and individuals. (those with an adjusted g ross income less than $5.00 * 0). It had been our concern *that in past y ears man who were eli for the pr I o and in need were not aware there were funds available to assist th-em.. We .were also aware that funds not authorized and expended in the desi communities were redistributed to communities who had w lists. In an effort to assist as man q ualif led needs as possible, notices of the pro (See. Exhibit C) were inserted in the q uarterl y sewer billin for three months. This prod'uced immediate, dramatic results. Durin the y ear we received 21 applications which we reviewed accordin to the previousl established g uidelines shown in Exhibit D. We approved fund in of 12 applications for a total amo of. $26, 000,, and placed 5 applications on a waitin list to be funded if additional mone became available. In Februar we were g iven instruc- tions to proceed with submittal of as man g rants as we could' have read (necessar papers, bids,, etc.) b April 30. It is anticipated we will fund about 17 g rants totalin .$12,,000 over our ori allocation. A flow chart showin applications received and action . s taken to date is attached as Exhibit Es SECTION 8 MODERATE REHABILITATION PROGRAM B resolution dated December 6,, 1979 Maplewood became a participatin communit in the new Metro Council HRA Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Pro T . his pro will provide below market interest rate loans for moderate rehabiltation of 50 units of rental housin for low and moderate income tenants . in the participatin communities. The pro will emphasize small multl*-*unit buildin of 2-12 units, SCATTERED SITEI HOUSING GRANT AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT -- In J_978 -a g rant for $72,,000 was received for ac of 5 lots which woul.d be g iven awa­7' b lotter s to provide additional opportunities for home ownership b moderate income families We also had submitted a re for $600,000 for a Communit Development Block Grant -for streets and utilities for the Section 8 proposed Famil Housin on White Bear Avenue south of Ra&atz. Inasmuch as we onl received $100,,000 of Communi- t Development Block Grant mone we were g iven permission from HUD to use o-ur $72,,000 g rant with this - amount to aid in keepin -that project economi- call possible, SUBSIDIZED HOUSING PROPOSALS REVIEWED* - The followin para con-- tai a summar of the present.'status of various proposals from the present a past y ears, a. Lund on South McKni - These 49 units of famil housin (a part of the old Wensch PUD) have been constructed and had all been rented before construction was completed. b. Pink Proposal - This is the Section 8 famil proposal for 57 units on the west side of White Bear Avenue south of Radatz. The area ori l planned as RL, was g iven a plan chan to RLE,, and a PUD with cond it ions as well as the Communit Developement Block Grant fundin referred to above'. Constructio will not . start until there is a re.solution to the problems resultin from the conditions attached to the PUD, c. Li on - Van D - Althou this proposal for- famil townhouse 3_ u n 'ts had alread received set-aside funds, , it did not materialize as the re for the necessar plan chan was denil-ed, 2 T it Id. Veber on Woodl - This re for a plan chan to allow an apart . meat buildin for the elderl wa-s approved, and letters from HRA (and cit council) were sent to appropriat.e .a , supportin the proposal. The pro did not become realit however, because there was no Sect-ion 8 fundin available. e. Zion Lutheran on L - This Section 202 (non-prof it) .. Section 8 senior buildin w 124 units was funded in .September. There are several members of the communitv an the board of - directors. The contrac- tor for the buildin is Mc Gou Construction Compan The buildin will be mana b Wilder. Althou construction has not y et started, there is alread a list of over 100 names desiring. occupanc HOUSING MAINTENANCE CODE At the re of the Cit Council, the HRA has a ssisted in the preparation process and review of a Housin Main- tenance Code, and met with council members to discuss and further revise the document before its submittal to the Council for action. ALLOCATION GOALS For the 3 y ear period 19-77-79, Maplew'ood was ex-, pected to produce 335 units of new low/ mod.e,r''ate income housin Needless to - sa we did not meet this g oal. An anal of the. reasons. for our failur'e was contained in last y ear's annual report. The new 1980-8.2 g oals are more complex and a-re desi famil lar famil and elder- l as we -11 as new units and existin To further complicate the issue, the communit is n g iven an allocation of a number of units, but a fair share percentage g e which is translated into a dollar value which. must then be converted to a unit number. (See Exhibit F) . It is hoped we will not experience the problems meetin this g oal that we did with the last one., HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN Applicants for Federal fundin must submit a HAP (Housin Assistance_ Plan) . Enclosed as Exhibit G is our first el attempt in this fie"ILd, arrived at after much consultation and redrcl 'ftin It is f or a OT-ie Vear period onl NEXT YEAR'S PROGRAM While the chan housin scene makes it difficult for. us to predict ever we ma be doin in the comi V n y ear , the followin items are predictable at the present time, and are submitted f o r y our in o rma t i0ii a. Continued participation in the Metro HRA Section 8 Rental Assis- tance Pro and the MHFA Grant Pro b. Participation in the new Metro HRA Section 8 Moderate.Rehabili- tation Pro .for rental housin c. Continued monitorin of proposals for fundin which have appeared bef ore us in the past to see whether or not the are f unded and construc- ted,, as well as reviewin incomin -proposals in accordance with need and compatibilit with the comprehensive plan, and makin appropriate recom- mendations on same to' the proper a d. Review and revise if necessar the Housin Plan ..r.e b the Mand -Plannin Act of 1976... The HRA wid-11 also be lookin at the Housin chapter of the comprehensive plan as revised b the Plannin Com- mission 0 -3- e. A. joint meeting will be 'held with the. City Council in February to review our year's performance and: attempt to outline a work program for. the coming year . f . If , at any t ime it i.s felt additional input or guidance from the council is desirable for the proper functioning of the HRA, this will be Corninunicatt-:d to * you either by memo, a request f or a shirt sleeve session, or under "Visitor Presentation" on your agenda if time. is short* Sincerely, . r Lorraine Fischer . Chairman, HRA M OUSING AND REDEVEL AU THORITY MEMBER Lorraine Fischer 1812 N.. Furness Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Guy Glover 809 E. Belmont Lane Maplewood, Minnesota 55117 Frances J u ker 1 965 Barclay Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Wilbur Nemitz 1 069 S. Crestview Drive Maplewood, Minnesota 55119 Maria Larsen Fischer 2001 Duluth Street 0 . Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 TE EX PIRES Ma rc h 1981 March 1982 `March 1983 March 1982 March 1980 ATTENDANCE 0 -- Absent X - P'r'esent W1 4 t An Fischer x 0 X x X X x x X X x Glover 0 0 X x X X 0 X x X X duker X 0 x X 0 x x x X 0 x Ne m i t z x 0 X x 0 x x X X X Larsen x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- Absent X - P'r'esent W1 4 t ' MAPLEWOOD RENTAL UNITS ^ ' AS OF 2/7/80 Century East 1247-Century Avenue North . Tartan Village 2585 Conway Edgerton Highlands 48.2 E. Skillman BrOOkV Manor 131 N. Century - Hazelwood - Gear Apts. 151.0 E. County Road B ` Bertram GetSug 2024 Clarence JOhn`Larson 1272 E. County Road 8 Way Lindahl 1878 English Street . Maple 'Manor . 176.0 Adolphus Maplewood Manor 2271 Atlantic Maplewood Townhouses, 384 SDuth McKnight ,English Manor 18D9 English Bernard McVey 2109 B'radley N. Alex, Mi ni oh 1915 Arcade R.S.L. InveStment 315 E. Larpenteur Lawrence Reed 1068 Belleorest Drive Towns Edge Properties 1881 Furness Georgeann Wilson 1898 Manton KEY: BF Bedroom F �l ~ - e roO� �m y BE - Bedroom Elderly g Total 8 - 2 8F . l - l BE l Total l - 2 BF ]3 Total 2 - / B g - 2 BF ] 2 BE l - 4 8F ll Total 1 - 2 BF ll Total . - . "` lO - 2 BF 2 Total ' 2 - | BE I Total ! - 2 BF 2 Total 2 - 2 8F 27 ` Total 27 - 2 BF 5 Total ! - l BF 5 Tota1 5 - 3 BF 7 Total 7 - 2 8F l TOtal F l TOtal l ~ l BE 8 TOt8l 8 - 2 8F I Totol l - 2 BF 3 Total 3 _ 2 BF I T o t a l l - 2 BF 6 ^ GRANT COMMITTEE GUIDELINES FOR MAPLEWOOD _ p The purpose of these Gui del ineS 1S to Set forth the process and ' crjteri a f or reV� ^ l� cations f MHFA H I ' o ew7n� �pp c� Qn� Or Home mprOVemGnt Grant Program FundS. ` The GraDt Committee ]! b ' responsible f determining �h ee Vv � r��0On� � or e ` eligibility and deciding which applicants receive grant funds accordiDg� to the General Grant Program Guidelines and according to these Guidelines, ' The G ra n t C o m m i t t e e should a l so be p r e p ared A O act a s a g r1 e Y a | c e pane7 to answer the questions and hear the complaints of reS1deynt8 ' refused grant funds. ` Committee Member h� Th8 .e�bersh�p of �h� Grant Committee �onS��tS - f Maplewood H .A m O ��p 8wOo� K members. C ommittee The meetings of the Committee shall .be held the Same as those Of the `HRA (presently the second Tuesday Of the month at 7:30 p.m.) in order to establish priority guidelines for the review of grant applications. The Grant Committee may a7sO meet as necessary in s p e c - / a l m e e t i n g s - in o r d e r to r e v i e w a p p l -i c a t i o n s until a l l g r a n t funds are committed- Upon review of each application, the Com- mittee w i l l determine the priority ranking Of the application and approve grants within the funding limitation. Application Review Criteria Each application for grant funds shall be determined to be eligible on the basis of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Grant Program eligibility guidelines and shall further be assigned a numerical ranking based on the priority criteria listed below. A. Eligibility Guideli Applicants must meet the General Grant Program Guidelines for eligibility as to Ownership, Income, Zoning, and Eligible Improvements of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Home , Improvement Grant Program. Prforfty iS to be given to elderly applfoarltS and energy related improvements. 7 \ \ ' �.7 ` ��»� E PRIORITY GUI Appl .c ons wi 1 1 be reviewed in order of date and time received. Eligible applicants as defined by St.atut.e, meeting one or more of the fol l'owi ng Guidelines, will be awarded points, Those appl i cants with the highest point totals will be given fi rst cons dera ti ons for grant monies, provided that pri or-i ty is to be given to elderly appl i cants, and energy related improvements, not wi thstan 1 ng point tota 1 s . 1. Income 0 - $1,000 - 10 points $1,000 - $2, - 8 points $2,000 - $3,000 - 6 points $3,000 - $4,000 - 4 points $4,000 - $5,000 - 2 points 2. Number of Residents in Housing Unit for whom a $300 deduction is not allowed under M.H. F.A. , Item 2 -D, Form 605 2 1 point 5 - .4 points 3 - 2 poi nts 6 - 5 points 4 - 3 points 7 - 6 points 3. Age of Applicant Above 90 - 10 points 80 - 90 - 8 poi nts 70 - so -- 6 points 60 - 70 5 points 4. 100 °Q Permanent Disability for Head of Household under the aq of 62. Head of Household - 4 points 50 Location Adjacent to (within six blocks) of a Federally Subsidized Housing development containing at least 50 housing units- 4 poi nts 6. Enemy Related Repai rs - 4 - 10 points 7. Imminent Health and Safety Dan er 1 - 15 points The foregoing system- of point allocation is an experimental format which . may be revised as time and experience dictates. N 1 /T \. i `1 ' -.� 6. '.tc4� ne,'1..4::Y!. .� ..i +n. �r.b'.E.Ji�• RJ .r11+} ..1i :.t.�•.S : !. .r 1.. a. ,. .. b.. rfeb-3n r.N:. } S.rw + . a N r.:3Av +i. i.. .1.4 ar. \ I T .. L iu. � a . ... .. i•l w . 1A• ..V.1'• l...r ...,+. r ... ., ..f ..�4.1 ... .1 .. i .�• a /a. F.il .l� }�. 1. �./.a. r�!'. .�'l�•, ..... 1,L il+n• f. a.. f /v/ .4 • s..f .�� . A O , Q! Q 0 0 ! 0 Y EAR I V FUNDING 'K '^� u � 0 0 a �, a 1-4 �,, 'u � 0 r,, . u u O 'd u X05 A R` I I0 TOTAL GRANT AMOUNT $2 67 0 -W 0 u u aj aV � � C . 0� X4 1 0 0 0 0 _ b ° t X � CU Q) k W � Ot Comments , . u JULY 1 a > 7 - J LY 19 .,.� u �° u �. , �v a � �, ^ u "u M M ` } � � � rrt D AT E 0 F R -.1' c4 1 I. 1 C C) 0 0 C 0 U 0 APRIL 1980 - 1. 2650 HARVESTER JULY 3 0K 8/7 8/14 A $4 675 $4 2 57 0 OK YES YES _ Y 2. 1041 E. CO. RD. C JULY 2. OK 8/7 8/14 A $1, 7 65 $2 .164 1 OK YES YES Y 2 roof vents/ 3. 2215 CRAIG PL. # JULY OK 8/8 8/14 A $2 250 � $2 523 OK YES Y P Roof com lete- bubbles remain 4. 376 E. VIKING DR. JULY 13 OK 8/7 8/14 A $2 280 $1 512 OK YES YES Y Letter sent 4 -3 -80 to seek bids T 5. 949 C n 4' �� T JULY 19 OK � 8/8 8 /14 A Check water u:� � � 6. 814 N. STERLING JULY 14 OK 8/7 8/ A $3 550 $! f OK YES YES See ( ! 7. 1891 N. I�iCKNIG� T JULY 24 Com-- 8/8 8/14 R ( $7,842.80 - . Income too high ment 8. 1423 E. CO. RD. B JULY 25 OK 8/8 8/14 A $2, 365 1 $1, 535 OK YES YES 9. 2022 EI GLIS11 AUG 10 OK 9/6 9/11 A $1 800 Letter sent to seek bids - 4/3/80 1 Letter sent to seek bids - 4/318.0 10 . 10 83 GORD AUG. 13 OK 9/6 9/11 A $2 350 $3 1.50 j I 11.1887 JACKSON AUG. 15 OK 9/11 9/11 A $2,125 $l 291 OK YES YES Y Y Y See � Received only 10 points in ranking 1.2.1840 BARCLA.' AUG. 15 Com- 9/10 ; 2/12 R ect ion letter sent 4/3/80 ment i 1 3.1244 E. RYAN AVE. AUG. 20 OK i 9/11 i 9/11 A I Letter sent to seek bids - 4/3/80 14 , 1 359 KOuLMAN AUG. 28 OK NO N/A A licant withdrew her a D11cation W OK I 1 15 . 1.7 5 0 EDWARD AUG. 29 No e 9/4 ! 9/11 A $3 $3 377 OK YES YES YES Y Y 16.1.863 BARCLAY SEP. O K 3/28 ; 4/8 1 ~.2675 STILLWATER 0 CT.24 OK 11/141 4/8 �^ Income too high IS.25 HAZELt.f00D 0CT.30 ? 11/9 � 4/8 R , Re" ect ion Letter - 4/80 Need repayment certi.. irate signed a W. ARPLNTEUR 1 ,. 75 �� NOV .14 T .14 OK 11 / l3 / 1 8 i A ?C�, 1 ~45 EDGERI'ON NTOV. 18 3/28 4/8 ' -` T OK 3/28 4/8 } ( ($23, 71.7) • Exhibit F HOUSE11a Table I I (Cont.) FAMILY $10, 200,000 ' PossIble ossi e Fair Dollar Units Un1.ts Hennepin County Share Fair New E xist s Co n tInued Percent Share Const. ifs Excelsior .19% $ 19,744 5 6 Golden valley 1. 125,865 29 35 Greuniiood .02 2, 1 03 0 1 I►opka��s 1.39 141,564 33 40 Lun Lake .08 8 2 2 Haple Grove -1.10 112, 295 26 31 t,•wclicine, L ake .02 1,789 0 1 nneapol..1s 24.76 2,525,014 581 706 t1 1111 etonka 10 79 182,271 42 51 Minnetonka Beach .02 1,762 0 0 =: *nnetrista .08 8 2 2 Hound . 33 33,300 8 9 No-w hope .87 89,053 21 25 Orono .24 24,550 6 7 ossno .14 4,563 3 4 PIymouth 2.15 218,873 50 61 Richfield 1. 87 190,81 . 7 44 53 Robbinsdaie .50 50,806 12 14 Anthony .61 61,939 14 17 �:. Louis Park 2.24 228,699 53 64 St�ore,�oc�c1 .22 22,570 5 6 Spring Park .17 17,719 d 5 Tonka Lay .04 4 , 514 1 1 lYayzata .25 25,786 6 7 Wood .01 1 , 387 0 0 couitzr DOTAL 53.9.9% $5,507,382 �., 7 - ,53 7 . RanisaY County Arden Hills . 63 64,592 15 18 Falcon heights .26 26,014 6 7 Gem Lake .04 3 1 1 Lauderdale .17 17,745 4 5 Kittle Canada °57 57,717 13 16 � � w ! oundsv.iew .47 47,584 11 13 New nriyhton 1.06 108,505 25 30 North Oaks � .10 10, 6.46 2 3 .North St. Paul .32 32,145 7 9 Roseville 2.00 2.03,901 47 57 SL. Paul 10.42 1,063,028 240 . 297 Shoreview .90 92,243 21 26 Vudnais He ights .39 39,757 9 11 trYs i. to Bear Lake . 48 48, 4 78 11 14 1 t e Be Twp, ,17 17,465 4 .5 COUN COUN `1'Y `I'OTA , 993, 05 _ 458 557 ' i : Table I I (Cont.) LD TYPE GOALS F FOR C0?Q TU1i1TZF' t. LARGE l: AI -U LY E ELDERLY $2,040,000 $ $8,1601000 Fair D P©ssibl,e'Possible P Units F Fair D Possible P Possible Total a at Share F Fa .r N New E Exist, Dollar U Units U Units T HOUSING ASSI -S.TANCE PLAN 9B - 0 1 ON E Y E A R P N NARPATT.VF (PART I EXISTING HOUSING CONDITIONS 9 Data for the total number of occupied units was derived from the. updating of Maplewood's 'Comprehensive Plan by . Midwest Plannin and Researc-h in Jul 1979. Data was also received from the Metropoll'tan Council and The R.L.. P olk Company. These fi were checked a the number of buildin permits issued for sin and multi-family units since 1971. VACANCY AND TURNOVER RATES Maplewood's housin market reflects its re posi- tion as - an inner rin suburb. Vacanc rates for sin family housin ran lower than those of Ramse Count and the re as a whole durinc, the last three q uart- " ers of 1978. Mvltiple family vacanc rates in Maple- wood were. close to the re level* durin the same peri od. Sin famil turnover rates, however, were lower i,n Maplewood than in either Ramse Count or the re while multiple famil turnover rates were some- what hi durin 1978. The actual fi shown are from the fourth q uarter of 1978, OWNER/RENTER RATIO This was based upon percenta factors reflected in the 1970 census of housin and updated b Midwest Plannin and Research in July of 19790 DEFINITION - SUB STANDARD (a) General. An buildin or portion thereof including an dwellin unit, g uest room or suite of rooms, or the premises ors the same is located, in which there exists an of the followin listed conditions to an extent that endan the .life, limb, health, propert safet o r welfare of the public or the occupants thereof shall be deemed and hereb is. de- .clared to be a substandard -buildin (b) Inade Sanitation. Inade sanitation shall include but not be limited to the followin 1. Lack of, or improper water closet, lavator bathtub or shower in a dwellin unit. 2. Lack of , or improper water cl osets 1 av,atories and bathtubs or showers per number of g u*ests in a hotel. 3. Lack of, or improper ki tchen s i nk . 4 Lack of hot and cold runnin water to plumbin fixtures in a hotel 5. Lack of hot and col d runni n water to pl umb i n fixtures in a dwel lin unit.. 6. Lack of ade heatin f aci 1 i ties. 7 Lack, or improper operation of re ui red veh ti - latin equipment. • 8.. Lack of mi nimum amounts of natural I * i g ht and ventilation re by this Code. 9. Roam, and space di mens ions I ess than re ui red ..by t.his Code, 10 Lack of -re red ele . ctri cal 1 i g hti n 0 I Dampness of h ab i tab Te r. boms 12. Infestation of insects, vermin or. rodents as determined b the health officer. 13. General dilapidation or improper maintenance. 14 Lack of connection to re sewa disposal s 15. Lack of ade g arba g e and rubbish stora and removal facilities as determine d by the health officer. (c) Structural Hazards. Structural hazards shall in- clude. but not be limited to the followin 1. Deteriorated or indade foundations. 2. Defective or deteriorated floorin or floor supports. 3. Floorin or floor supperts of insuff i c i e n t size to carr imposed loads with safet 4. Members of walls, partitions, or other vertical supports that split, lean, list, or buckl due to defective material or deterioration. 5. Members of wall. partit.ions, or other vertical supports that are of insufficient size to carr imposed loads with safet 6. Members of ceilin roofs, ceilin and roof supports or other- horizontal members which sa split, or buckl due to defective material or deterioration. 7. Members of ceilin roofs, ceilin and roof -supports, or other horizontal members that are of insufficient size to carr imposed loads with safet 8. Fireplaces or chimne which list, bul or settle, due to defective material -or deterio- ration. Units "suitab*le for rehabilitation" were derived from 'the 1974 Metropolitan Council "Windshield Surve The Metro - ro- 1 politan Counci 1 definition of SFR, which is iden'tical to the ' definition of SFR as used in this table, is as follows.- Definition: "Suitable for Rehabilitation" Major Rehab i 1 i tati on Lar units needin $10,000 or - nore to rehabilita and small -units needin more than $7,500 in Rehab - ilitation. Substantial Rehabilita+%.Jon: Lar units needin $5,000 to 10., 000 to rehabilitate, and small units needin $4,000 to .$7,500 Some Rehabilitation: Less than substantial,,. but needin some rehabilitation to make the unit safe and healthful. (reference uniform buildin code). The units shown as substandard for the most part are housin stock that was built prior- to 1939. This information ation was taken from the 1970 census, 12. r. F, t PAST I I HOUS INC ASSI STANCE NEEDS OE LOWER INCOME HOUSEHaLDS All figures in Table Two are updated housing material F as provided by Metro Housing staff. Also work done for Maplewood in 1978 and. 1979 by the Nati on Technical Information Service and .Midwest Planning and Research show* .-ghat 25.8% of Maplewood families in 1976 had an income of under $10,000. . This would work o.ut to be 2,200 families. Table Two indicates Mapl ewood i s total housing assistance needs of lower i.n core household as 2,196. r Although Table Two does not -ask for information with regards to female-headed househo.l d`s , the 1 atest Ramsey County Welfare Information. (Oc+,77) shows 751 A.. F o D. C. families living in Maplewood. Stat.ist.ically 99% of these families are female head of households. 13 s w M (PART I I T } GOALS FOR HOUSING ASSISTANCE TO LOWER INCOME HOUSEHO Maplewood presently anticipates the funding of 57 . units of new rental family housing during 1979. For thi s reason our one year goal for 1980 i s qui to 1 ow. I f we do not rece i ve f undi n for these fami l y • units , our goal for new fami ly units wool d be ap- proximately 75 uni is . Figures under rehabilitation a s s i s t a n c e to home- owners'' are derived from projected capa.b i l i ti es under a continuation of the M. H . E. A. Grant Program. Mapl e-- y wood annually receives the highest amount of' funding in suburban Ramsey County. For the year 1979 --80 we will spend over $26,,000 on rehabilitation. The figures under "existing rental units reflect Maplewood ! s allotments through participation in the Section 8 existing rental assistance program and two other major projects which have been built in Maple- wood with Federal. -as s i s tan ce. NEW CONS HOMEOWNERS We think that during 1980 the HUD 235 Program wi 11 make it possible for some large families to purchase homes . Maplewood a l s o recently passed a new lot s i z e ordinance allowing single family homes to be built on 7, 5.00 sq. ft. lots. Through these programs Maplewood intends to expand the qual i l and quantity of housing - for low and moderate i ncome,el derly and t+ami 1 i es. 14 WAB No. 61 -R, 87'5 N., 1, 1 1 r0% AA A 14 • r a'w r 9 Fich:'L)';itJtiOn PART Itf. GOALS O HOUSING ASSIST ANCE TO LOWER-I HOUSEHOLDS y . 5 A HOUSEHOLDS . G Fczl :roily is;cd ELDE RLY SMd�,t~L LARGE A •!r PEI�Cc TYPE AND SOURCE OF 2 ( Persons) FAMIL (4 or , (5 o 2Y F.0UJ:NG ASSISTANCE 30 TOTAL find loss more T E H AN D I • pv sonsl O r- On;] CAPPED .... r w . (�l ( b) ( c) (d f�! I Q fo r H o n e o w n e r s • , ea ••..ee. er•e..r_� •wrsLCa.w�rra r - .... r.i rn e.. • ■ �. ir..r...rw�+. S 3 . .�.w. - ^ N CQ'7s:ru' 1icn 5 ' ' . 14 0,., =r 5 Fz;;.r^i:y ass►stcd 5�__�__ 0 2' 3 10 1 4 c :fin, E 9 Fich:'L)';itJtiOn 2 5 G Fczl :roily is;cd _ 2 3 5 S AS3�ita'�cC l�; R� • 4 5 e 0 30 1.5 •'"""" +�•�ev { r.iruc:i0n 9� r 0.10 13_1Iy zs sisted O i I ti 1. r .... r w 12 icn 0 13 assil'.'cd 14 0,., =r 5 "" FxistiP r -+ 1 " 10 E 1 T no 1 + fine 8 2 35 ' 23 Percr'nt by hoes told Tvne 1 0 0 nlc °lo % .. PART 'IV. GENERAL LOCATIONS (To be submitted on maps in this a pplica tio n) . PART V. NAR RATI V E (A ttach additional sheets, It appropriaW 1. Describe the sources of assistance proposed under the category e'Ot cr 2. Desc any special housing conditions or housing assistange need; in the community including the reeds of any identifiable segment of 04 t;ota: grcuR of lovjc r•income households; e.g., minorities, Wnalc•headed households, handicapped. 3. Describe those actions that the npp�Icant will take to inintato the provision of Assisted housing and to further fair housing for minorities and •�romcn. ti CHICK IF THE APPLICANT WI SHES TO REVIEW STATE HFDA HOUSING PROPOSALS Paco 2 of 2 Pagcss HUD-7U7 t6•�3� .► MEMORANDUM TOW- Cit Mana FROM: Director of Communit Development SUBJECT: Time Extension - Preliminar Plat APPLICANT: Dennis Prokop PROJECT: Clausen Addition DATE:, April 23 s, 1980 The enclosed letter from Dennis M. Prokop re a 90 da time extension of. the preliminar plat approval for the Clausen Addition. Counci I approved the prel i mi nar p] at on Jul 19, 1979 subject to the fol I ow* i n condi ti ons : The final plat shall not be approved, unless a public easement is .obtained on th-e propert at the northwest Corner of Ed Street and Riple Avenue, that will g uarantee the pondi n capacit shown on the Maple Draina Plan. 2. A storim water pipin s shall be provided from the westerl ed of the propert to the draina easement between lots 1 and 2, block 2 a .ricl also alon said eas.ei-i-ient*from proposed Bellwood Avenue to the southerl pond. 3. A draina easement and pipin shall be pruvided alon lot lines to drain the nursin home parkin lot 'to the southerl pond. 4. A storm water pondin easement shall be provided for that part of the I subject propert below elevation 864. 5. The southerl 100 feet of Outlot A shall be- desi as Outlot B and combined with the nursin home propert to the east. The remai nder of Outlot A shal I. be combined with the adjacent propert to the north. Both deeds shall be held in escrow b the Cit Attorne to be filed after the plat is recorded. 60. The final, plat shall. not be approved, unle,�s the Council orders a public improvement project. to extend water from Ed Street to proposed Sunrise Court* 7. The developer shall construct a temporar aspha-1-t. path on the west side of Ed Street, from Roselawn to th.e south ed of the plat on Ed Street., 8. Dedication of an additional 16.5 feet for Ed Street. .O October 18, 1979 Council approved a 90 da time extension of the preliminar plat for -the ClaUsen Addition. r • - . „r _ - _, - - .� - - __. _ --- __ _ " LARK t< t • r S LITTLE � Al� ADA D. a w • • AURtE R cc It co a cc 25 CO UNTY -- ca • 1 H F: +� t3 U R K E AV. ELDRIDGE • �• •_ .. m , =• �`' Sa � dy •� � BELD°1 LA • HELMON7 t71�'C SKI A 0 V E. ¢ 5� SKiLL!°{A • r to K. MAN -AV $ , -' SS VERNON: AVE. p > cc T uj 0� MT. VERNON AVE a � m NO MR Z J DOWN AYE . 2 W VE. < � o e ~• o }- t i 0 uV w -� ROSELaystN a AVE. n- d c 26 Q 1 4 3 1s !LO A L1�� OO D A V Q E L l a QQ W1 _ L? 1 • uQ FS AVE. z •`•s �� FEW, 7OW AV O ' P. C Art lo • " )­ K Nos z To 4 , m c ST AVE. CC w R W PR AVE, p m W p 30 30 if AV i. �e �M 2? c• F 4 , �x &i k ! 9 C L A U S A DOf T/ ON ...:i. . ..__ 1.. f . • :.. d ri. K i i w on wf J�. f. t w w Mw., r► w . �w w , J �1' _..' w.7.r.: SOS rA WH ' •+1 • • ` 1 •••..�. -. �.�.. �T .. ..�..1 �- � .�...�r..�r' tL' L�i` ?«f i _1'I.n Ql' � 1-.:: i+i � .. _ � � � ...- ...,._� , .. -..... ..._ ��- r mo w _ ..�_ 1 1 •• •.. �_ � • : �� ' r E` _ _�, _ .... z .._..,..,,,.' - $ 6 ' � as • Q \ r a.., w-1 t..+ • 2 • �� too Ar To _ n...i w .�..•. `` -�-- -- -"T '+��"`�?'"'7"� _ ate:.•- ac,t= •'�..r..e.:� •���'�C7C��j . 1 J r 1 x t April 14, 1980 :City of Maple- ood Planning Department .1.380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, mesota 55109 bear Mr. Ekstrand: We are still attempting to meet the city's developers agreernen.t require- merits. We feel we Will need a 90 day exte ition of the prel ' plat approval in order to prepare for final . plaf- approval. 1-hope the urrtgage money situation will ease up and we will be able to. make application for final approval soon. You Dennis. M. Prokop DN P lkk April 22, 1980 STAFF REPORT To: City Manager Barry Evans From: Chief of Police R. W. Schaller Subject.: Request :For Authorization to Utilize a City Vehicle to Attend Competit 'lve Pistol Shoots The Police Department Pistol Team has requested permission to utilize a City vehicle for transportation to the following locations on the dates listed: May 18 Rochester June 8 St.- Cloud June 15 Duluth June 22 Duluth July 20 Mankato September 28 Rochester We have allowed this practice in the past, and I recommend you seek City Council approval to continue it this year. RTitiTS . J s ' cc T.. L. Hagen Lt. Cusick Lt. Delmont Officer Skalman Act* on bar 0 aunc i 1.] Date y �f1 t �h+ rwrr i MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Gall Avenue (Project 79 -10) Lakewood Drixe (Project 79 -11) DATE: April 23, 1980 These two projects are being considered as a result of a petition from Mr. Robert Tilsen. In accordance with the City's past practice, the developer would not be assessed for the improvements but rather pay his proportionate share of the cost under the terms of a Developer Agreement. Three alternatives are be considered as follows: 1. Gall Avenue 08.0' East of McKnight) 2. Lakewood Avenue (County Road "D" to Brenner) 3, Combined (Gall- McKnight to Lakewood and Lakewood- County Road "D" to Brenner) The attached Financing Summary shows each alternative for comparison. If the City Council chooses to order the-improvements, it is recommended that it be contingent on the Developer paying his proportionate share of the improvements through. the terms of a Developer Agreement. Action by Co im - E End orse e ,', Pei ected., I.- > + o- (1) Under the City's current assessment policy, the City's share of the watermain cost is $950. (2) Under the City's current assessment policy, the City's share of the vatermain cost if $1,360. (3) Under the City's past policy of 0.045 /sq.ft. rate, the City's share of the storm sewer cost is $30,400. To eliminate the City's share through full assessment, the rate Would be $0.136. (4) Under the City's past policy of 0.045/sq. ft. 'rate',' the City's share of the storm sever cost is $27,900. To eliminate the City's share through full assessment, the rate would be $0.129. a - e FI'rtANCING SUMMARY Total Cost .Developer Share Public Cost Assessment Rate GALL AVENUE Street $ 42 $ 21,000 $ 21,050 55.40 Watermain 13,650 6,500 7 20.00 (1) Services 5,050 2,900 2 721.43 Sanitary Sever • Services 4.025 2 1 2 325 670.83 TOTAL .$64,775 S 33,100 $ 31,675 LAKEWOOD DRIVE I Street $ 77 $ 39,400 $ 38,480 72.24 Watermain 24,220 12,200 12,020 20.00 (2) Services 1,920 -'0 - 1,920 640.00 Storm Sewer 57 11,700 45,400 0.045 ( 3) TOTAL $161,120 $ 63,300. $ 97,820 COMBINED Street $210,580 $ 59,200 $151,380 64.04 Watermain 57,470 16,500 40,970 20.00 Services 15,240 2,800 12,440 692.00 Sanitary Sever Services 9,744 3 6,744 749.54 ::torn Sewer 53,900 11,000 42,900 0.045 (4) TOTAL. $346,934 $ 92 $254,434 (1) Under the City's current assessment policy, the City's share of the watermain cost is $950. (2) Under the City's current assessment policy, the City's share of the vatermain cost if $1,360. (3) Under the City's past policy of 0.045 /sq.ft. rate, the City's share of the storm sewer cost is $30,400. To eliminate the City's share through full assessment, the rate Would be $0.136. (4) Under the City's past policy of 0.045/sq. ft. 'rate',' the City's share of the storm sever cost is $27,900. To eliminate the City's share through full assessment, the rate would be $0.129. a - e COUNTY ROA O O g: ------------ - - - - -- " --o-- --------- - -d-- - ------- PROPOSED R/W r_-_. --i.�� ACQUISITION r H. 6 94 1, 12 j 1 + °2T ono DI 060 070 040 100 2s I - 27 26. 25 25 25 33 1 � r r- - 1 PROPOSED R/W ACOUISITION 1 23 i ; t ; 'f''* - -, _ •. GALL A Vi FT -o-- - _ _....___.._..4--- 4 -.._- - - -- •. -_ ..r_rw _._- ..�.. -� �.:. 40 1` p 1 �r_ f' � 1 1 �,''- ", 1 O t 1 ♦ 1 w� � _ • • • 1 , { v1 t • , 1 , � 1 090 rj0 1 , 1 1 1 / ♦ ` 1 t • -� • • 1 , I 0 29 030 0 40 V �` `••� -r•�i, I 31 32 U.G. 020 PROPOSED PO tool -' -"-� OIL _ 060 ' PIPELIN _ ►Roplosco rowo ^ 1 S? -�- -- _ V , � TAANSMISSJ M 32 j _ q , 060 TOWERS 1 TRAMSM13siom Tow ERS 29 - i 0 U .. ,� V 7N 74- V i� • n C 1 / t / i♦ C N /� L E I - '• TS ExIsrlN •--- - �r � TT _ •�• - - -; / , , �. V 10 f � r -t `• �,(� .- -..�� ,� ,, D ,,• w .. ,_,- - rte polio ` �./ • B WN 4 -E 0 0 % S ' -- - - - - - -- -------- Q cr. I' Q m ' rrrrrr- r-r..\ r- ------ T -- r••____ -� err --r-r. ( ; ci 1 1 1 1 O -y � • I I I I 1 # . b LYDIA AV EN UE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD -- MINNESOTA GALL AVE. LAKEWOOD DRIVE FEASIBILITY STUDY PROPOSED WATERMAIN -- EXISTING. WATERMAIN -- --� PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER SCHOELL 8 MADSON , INC. Engineers 8 Surveyors Hopkins , Minnesota 55343 SCALEI 1" 200' DATE MARCH 1980 10731-6 '— - -- —• -- --- Tom- — - __' -_. _ —__ --. -�,.- , rn .—. � � . .... ....:IL: i • 1..�..�_^� _`_ e,L..�_„ . Mc.., 11 �-,,e+ �. <.t•Mh^7��E1�. ,�_._— _..__,._ , .nm,...�.�...•.n -v.., ^r+ • - �n - rn�b*Mu4 __.'�__'_ fi",,;.+'Sn,^ - f4""91 s•re` Rise .t•.e+r�wTM- ... <*�• mM•e� _ C4 UN T Y ROAD PROPOSED R/W ACQUISITION T y 694 r 0 020 026 • . ,. 1 �25 O 2S 0 25 t 25 ? 1 ~ • IB q r - f- PROPOSED R/W liJ t i ; ►- f �'t. ACQUISITION 25 ; 1 f'`* - _ -• GALL { M A VE. Ip,�opo, f 1 -. K T s •. �~ `a' .• , y �. . �y.e,.. :`r:a• ., - •. x.. .a. W �,�,y.,.,, �� a ✓h r � .iil:.. � 1.- _ � .` —" A .••J !�.. + .•�, 1„ �,.� � �f I .f �Q r� ; �I -'� �-,- —. - _ _ — `ww�.� a '.II y,.} "J" "v: -,. +j ,•'F -at' .. ^i ..o-, X - yam. 7R a ,�W( r ` 6w4 f O f 090 •� ; '_T_ 1 •• - >��� � - �__� •,1 ._1 ' i •' 28 sv • 40 40- 4f 020 `', -1 t l f 1 • .. ` -'�_` I •, r , '� 9 a EX 030 oao ' - -- -.._� ______„_••• ,•' l.J �• 1 �� • r r U. EXISTING S MP AREA ___ -- - qM •� 030 �• PROPOSED ` POND • 9�Q OIL �...,�. ..- ...,. PROPOSED _ 060 - -- - PIPELINE PR0 POND O SWALE ISSI TOWERS 32 tRAof hdISSION row pt Q d 060 O 28 ��. too U4O 00 i 0 PARK CRIST114 i ♦, s �� 1 I i ♦' �� POND Ap �` J��'- �,- • -� -_- j ; ,e `% Jf - • �� i POND j. �G ___ �. mss.. f . ♦� ♦ rr 1 A� r � •�. Uj x t 1 1 1 1 f 1 I 1 j i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 � 1 1 c � ,/ L YDIA - - -- A VENUE _._____. ►c A �, H f G TS. E• BRENNER AVE. i e Lki Q �J r E- • (: v Q Q W z CITY OF MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA GALL AVE. LAKEWOOD DRIVE FEASIBILITY STUDY PROPOSED STORM SEWER �--•- --� EXISTING STOR SEWER PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS �--• ---- DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT AREA SCI DELL a MADSON , INC. c'ngi.n.eers 5 Surveyors Hopkins 1 Minnesota 55343 SCAIE.i I. • 200 OATIEl MARCH t98O 10731 - 5 v J CL LU Q ca O MEMORANDUM TO: Cit Mana FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Public Hearin Adele, Fenton, Walter Street Improvements (Project 79-7". DATE: April 24, 1980 These improvements are Council initiated as a result of a re to develop a lot on the northeast corner of Adele and Fenton. As a result of the improvements, a number of new lots could be created, .,The attached sketch shows that ten (10) additional lots could be ...p if'a-portio*n of Fenton Avenue is vacated by the Cit Because of t he severe terrain in the area, two . (2) lots on the Adele Street cul-de-sac would re extensive g radin(Y and lots alon the west side ?D of'Walter Street would need to be filled.- Because of the expense to .develop t hese,.-lots, it ma be difficult to show special benefit in the amount of the proposed assessment. T'Ilus, the Cit deficit could be increase6. Actio b Co J-c Re ect Late.— (1) Generates deficit of $3, 140 - (2) Generates deficit of $16,960, full assessment rate is $0.174/S .F. Estimated Total Assessment for Typical City Lot 75' x 135' = $7,267. 00 9 i ' COST SUMMARY Adele S treet Total Cost Assessment, Rate Streets, Curb and Gutter $ 51,200 $ 58.80 Sanitary Sewer -- - -- -- - - ' Services (5 ea.) $ 2 $ 580 Watermain ` - $ 1,9 $ 20 (1) Services $ 3,600 $ 600 Storm Sewer $ 77 $ 0.0451S.F. (2) $154 (1) Generates a def icit of $900 . (2) Generates a deficit of $61,650, full assessment rate is $0.22/S. F. Estimated Total Assessment for Typical City Lot 75' x 135' = $7,546e00 Walter Street Total. Cost Assessment Rate Streets, Curb and Gutter $45,400 $ 55.09 Sanitary Sewer - - -- - - - .Services (3 ea.) $ 1 $ 580 Wa termain . $13 $ 20 (1) Services $ 3 $ 600 Storm Sewer (3) $22,900 $ 0.045/S . F . (2) (1) Generates deficit of $3, 140 - (2) Generates deficit of $16,960, full assessment rate is $0.174/S .F. Estimated Total Assessment for Typical City Lot 75' x 135' = $7,267. 00 9 i 4 4 Q7 0 w 0 d- W FROST hYE. X X X tf3 I -i FENTON j w w 0 W J Q Conceptual Lot Lines ..... Developed Lots . , .......... . PROJECT 79-7: ADELE 8 FENTON Ek WALTER I M . 0 a.. Z W J 4 Z sal Exisfing Sanitary Sewer Proposed Watermain { 0th .Proposed er .project ) �'Vatermai Existing Watermain - - r GORDON �•'. t LDcat 2001 27 / s F ROST A VE . h ♦ �"' mow. •.... �,�, �,� r 1 t � r f . f � f t t CL FE NTON ¢ =° A uj c , cn - -; of cn t r CL � i f f - Exisfing Sanitary Sewer Proposed Watermain { 0th .Proposed er .project ) �'Vatermai Existing Watermain - - r GORDON �•'. t LDcat 2001 27 / s h top . : F R O S T AVE. w�wrfrw� -. N� PHALEN LAKE Proposed Storm Sever Future Storm Sewer Drainage Area FENTON 4 � 4 4 LIE- 1 i Q- � U 1 GC � 1 i G t t 1 1 1 � t AVE. J 0.. Z W J Q 2 a W J W � D Q 7- 1 FENTON AVE. Proposed Storm Seger Future Storm Sewer Droinnge Area cr W Z W Q a CL Proposed Storm Seger Future Storm Sewer Droinnge Area MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD BOAR.0 OF ADJJUSTME'NTS AND APPEALS 7 : 30 P o Mo ,. Thursday, March 6 1980 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 30--4 A. CALL TO ORDER A meeting of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7:38 P o lls by Chairman, Nelson, B. ROLL CALL Earl L. nelson, Chairman Present Norman G. Anderson Present Gary W. Bastian Present John C. Greavu Present Frances L. Juker Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of Meeting No. 80 -3 (February 7, 1980) Councilman Anderson moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 80 -3 (Fe bruary 7, 1980) as submitted. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all, D. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Variance: 501 Farrell Street - Larson - 7:30 P.M. a. Chairman NeIson convened the meeting fora public hearing regarding the re- quest of Mr. Dennis Larson, 501 Farrell Street., for a variance from the required lot width to construct a single family dwelling. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in order and stated the dates of publication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. C. Director of Community Development Olson presented the following Planning Commission recormnendation: "Commissioner F:'L.scher moved that the Planning Commission recommend to the Board of Adjustments and Appeals approval of the two variances subject to Council approving the lot division and based on the following: 1. The resulting lots would have more than the minimum 10,000 square feet required for a buildable lot; 2. There are other lots of this width iz the area; 3. This division and variance would not have an adverse affect on the proposed density planned for the neighborhood. Approval is subject to: 3/6 1,. Prior to approval of the - e deeds verif icatlon to be made to staf f thro ' ugh survey or lot stakes, setbacks a , either 29 If necessary the dr w re mall1tained, vewa y w il l be moved to the north side of the house Commissioner Ellef son seconded, �, Ayes 7 Nays - l (Commissioner Howard) d. Chairman Nelson called for proponents. The applicant, Mr. Larson, was heard. e. Chairman Nelson called for o on pp ents. The following were heard: Mrs. Cynthia Hall, 521 Farrell Street Mr. Mike , 5 Farrell Street Mr. Robert Hall, 5 Farrel Street. fe Chairman Nelson closed the ub • public hearing, g. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the va . s Sol Farrell reet to canstr variance . as requested by Mr. Denn St i Larson, uct a single family divided to t dwelling on a 60 foot to (Property affected, Lot 7, Block 7 -- l t' two lots 60 feet x 2 �7. S feet) . seconded by Councilman Anderson • Ayes -Mayor Greavu; Councilman Anderson and Councilperson : Juker. Nays -- Chairman Nelson and Councilman lman Bastian. E• ADJOURNMENT 8:14 P.M. City Clerk ... 2 3/6 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Variance - Unimproved Street LOCATION: I --494, west of Century Avenue (see enclosed maps) APPLICANT: Keith Libby OWNERS: Fee owners - Joseph and Margaret Ravlay Contract Purchasers. - Jay, Dean, ance Keith Libby DATE: April 2 1980 Requ Approval to construct at least one house (preferably three) on a land locked parcel. Site Description 1. Lot area: 8.52 acres 20 Existing land use: undeveloped P roposed Land Use Refer to the applicant's letters of justificatic dated January 9, 1980 and February 20, 19804 Surrounding_ Land Uses Northwesterly: Interstate 494 Southerly: Undeveloped property owned by Ramsey County Open Space zoned F, F,.arm Residential and planned for RL, Low Density Residential and OS, Open Space Easterly: Scattered single family homes Westerly: A small undeveloped parcel owned by he St. Paul Educational Foundation Past Actions 8 -3 -72: Council denied a request by the applicant to divide the site into three parcels. Staff had recommended denial because - :he City Code required formal platting of such a subdivision and further provides that no building permit shall be issued for single dwelling units on any property not having frontage on a public street. The land was considered remote and not ready for development. 10-- 20 --77: Council denied a variance for a hour w on unpaved Burr Street, north of Kingston Avenue, on the basis that: 1. There may be times of the year when emergency public safety serv1 ces could not be provided, such as police, and fire and ambulance due to a lack of snow plowing or an unstable road surface. This would open the City up to potential law suits. ,k. 20 This application does not meet. the spirit and intent of the ordinance. 3. It would establish a dangerous precedent for future cases'. 5- 18 -78: The City Council approved a variance for James Sabota to construct a storage building on a lot not having frontage on an i mproved street. This case was. similar to the current request, because the applicant proposed to use an undeveloped public right -of --way for access . Approval was subject to: 1. The driveway design shall be approved by the City Engineer and shall be a minimum of 25 feet in width 2. The applicant shall sign an agreement to maintain the drive to City standards including snow plowing. This agreement shal l be recorded to run wi th the property. Planning Considerations I. Land Use Plan designation: Predominantly RL, Low Density Residential. The southwest corner if planned for OS, Open Space. 20 Zoning: F, Farm Residential, 3. Section 501.020 of the 'City Code states that "no building permits will be issued for any construction. wi thi n the Village unless the building. site i s .located adjacent to an existing street which is dedicated and maintained as a Village street, or unless provision for street construction has been made in full compliance with this code and in no case until grading work as provided herein has been completed and certified to the clerk by the Village Engineer; except that in isolated instances the Council may enter an agreement with a property owner for special handling of an unusual situation which agreement shall be recorded so as to run with the land affected." 4. Section 1005.010 (5) of the City Code states that all lots shall abut on a publicly dedicated street. 5. The only access that this parcel has is a 33 foot wide undeveloped public right -of -way, that was dedicated .with. the :Carver Lots Plat in 1941. City Code requires a 60 foot wide right -of -way fog public street construction. 6. Section 462.357 Subdivision 6 (2) of the State Statutes provides that the Board of Appeals and Adjustments has the power to hear requests for variances from the literal provisions of the ordinance in instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the i ndi vi dual property under consideration, and to grant such variances only when it is derrrons trated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Legal Considerations .1 . Refer to enclosed letter from John Banni gan . 2. The City Attorney has stated on s i m i l a r cases in the past that if a driveway is constructed on a public right-of-way, the City will own and be responsible for the driveway. This means that we are legally liable for the maintenance. 2 As an example, if the applicant was to become ill 1 and call are ambulance, we could be liable i f an ambulance would not et to the child on a bike was injured after g house, because of 1 ack of mai ntena nce or snow p1 okAli ng . If a chi hitting a chuck ho e , we could be liable - I t s, therefore, important that a paved dri veway i a s provided and roved b - i . pp y .the City Engineer and that an agreement be recorded that runs with the Land guaranteeing maintenance driveway if the vari ance is a g ntenance o f the approved. Ptjh7 i r Wnr�c rnne; AoV-n +; „,., Sanitary sewer and water are no available, Public'Safety Consi Due to the site being landlocked, ocked t • serv ices when the long dri veway g here would be difficulty i n delivering veri n Publ i s Safety. serve i s mud g y y or blocked with snow. E C ons i derations l . Topography: very i i lly � y 2. Wetl ands : pondi n i n the southwesterly esterly .corner of the property. 30 Vegetoti on : thin wooded Citizen Comments Staff surveyed the surrounding property ners within • 22 �' 150 feet o f the site or� February , 1950, of the l0 property owners surveyed, one had no one did not reply and eight objections.' neighbors primary objections: ons : p y ght objected. The following is a summary of the nee y 1. Precedent - others with landlocked property will want to subdivide de and result in over population 2. Will disturb open space and wi 1 dl i fe 3. Hope houses are not+ on less than 100 foot l ots 4. It would put a driveway next to one house's back door I' 5. Natural sound barriers could be des y tro ed 6. Water table might be adversely affected Ana i s There is a hardship in this case. Ramsey • Ramsey County's acqui of the adjacent. property to the south has substantially reduced the feasibility of • developing a public street into the a ppl i cant's property. It is, therefore, reasonable to grant a variance for one house on a driveway. Since this driveway . Property should �veway would be on Public pro p y be paved. Allowing owi ng a.ny. additional homes, without a public street, wo.0 l d violate the intent of the ordinance and should not be allowed. 3 Recommendation Approval of the variance to construct one house on the site, based on the fi-ndin that: 1. There has been a hardship • caused the applicant, because the acquisition of the abuttin land to the south b Ramse Count Open -Space, has -substantiall reduced the f eas i bi I i ty of devel opi n a pub 1. i c s treet i n to the appl i cant's propert 2* The spirit and intent of the ordinance w ill 'be met if the applicant provides a paved drivewa alon the e.xis'tin right-of-wa and a to maintain it. Approv is subject to the follow- in • conditions:. 1. The applicant shall install a paved drivewa on the existin right-of- to the speci fi cati.ons of the Cit Engineer way , 2• The applicant. shall si an to maintain thedrive to City Standards , includin snow plowin This agreement shall be recorded to' run with the propert 30 Construction of an additional homes on., this propert must meet current requirements for plattin Action b Counci I * Endorserit M 0 (14 - r, i-L i e d Re! 0 C Enclosure: I - . Location Map 2. Propert Line Plap 340 Applicant's letters dated 1-9-80 and 2.20-80 4. Cit Attorne letter dated 3-25-80 4 V 25 t ? 23�� -- LINW000 AVE ` AHL AJE 72. z -, DA Hl o TZSN 7 LL , ,• R 2I Vd c U) P HYL1 72 494 H1 H 1�! 7 � 74 25_ 41E AVE. �s y E Hd TZ LAVE. r ^ V Z5 SOUTHC 72 ,trA• P. arver ®xoc AVE. nnnnn - Lake • 4 68 7 //) O , 1 2 Oil CARVEk 43 4 T 28N (� 221p 241 �21W 2:5 3 .494 SHINGTON Co. Local on Map F • a _- sir. r�' - � • - � } - DD • 4p • • � ro CO i • *� { r f � • r •i t . r N i i •i. i .. f - 1 t • F • \\ "f i J • L ,f r I v 4 - y • •t :4' 1 1 1 t a� t r: w�Y:• v� r�..viii4i ;.::Na..a.. + ,v.•f+3SY1'x' ' ' +us'`+. � .•1Y �4i�fr iw..'.Yr�'+A.r. •}jf`� %: ^v. 'k4�1'� `` �.. Lim A 0 ��• / / /� PrODerty Line sla Januar 9, 1.980 Maplewood Cit Council Cit Hall - .1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Council Members: .State law re that the propert owner re a variance f existin code provide ovide a statement showin a hardship placed on them and their eir propert We have a ver simple problem with our propert Unless we are g ranted the ri to use the roadwa which is alread platted, as our drivewa and be allowed to build on the propert even thou we don't have a proper road fronta accordin to code, we will be forced to abandon a ny plans we mi have had for this propert will be virtuall useless!! My brothers and I bou this land in the 601s, when lon drivewa and houses with no road fror,,ta were condoned b the cit In this undeveloped area (2591 Carver Ave is a perfect example) . B 19.73, when we approached the Council for permission to build three houses on'the pro- pert we were informed that cit polic had chan and that we would have to postpone our plans until adjacent propert (the Ledo propert was sold and developed. We could then make plans of our own, and the whole area would develop in an orderl fashion. With this is mind, we sat on our hands for six y ears, all the while pa $400+ per y ear in taxes on unbuild- able propert and waited for the "comin development". In 1979, after a series of public meetin it was decided b Ramse Count and Maplewood that all the land adjoinin ours be bou for the Count Open Space Pro After this move on the part of our local g overnment, an hope of ever g ettin g development in an open space corridor and developin o land is nil. An road put in to serve our land would have to be paid for b adjoinin propert owners . Ramse Count would have to pa the lions' share and that is, accordin to local officials I have talked to, out of the q uestion. Without a variance to build usin the existin roadwa as a drivewa and a waivin of standard road frontacre re .ments,* our land is worthless. We have spent time mone on - it, plannin to live there some da I would hope that r 4 . Maplewood City Council - 2- January 9, 1980 we would have the right to use the land that we own. Your consideration in the above matter will be appreciated. Sincerely yours, Keith Libby 6:680 Stillwater Blvd. St.. Paul., MN 55119 Phone 777 -8951 1 r' r w CTP t � 7 3 c) .j -0�1, u O-A-- to', j r 4, -Y �. V73 _ - f> Ou 4 4 { t e W Y\x, t LAJ t.� � � A,,(" U, eAf -^ry ♦te r`,, zz' r c E.....AI5, BANNIGAN & CIRESI, P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING STH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 155101 DONALD L. LAIS AREA CODE 612 JOHN F. DANNIGAN. JR. 224-3781 JEROME D. CIRESI PATRICK J. KELLY March 2 5 , 19 Mr., Geoff Olson City of Maplewood 1380 Fro Avenue . Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Re: Variance Requested by Keith . Libb y Dear Mr, Olson: Minnesota Stat.�es , Section .4 62.357 (6 } rants authority ' g to the Council "To hear requests for variances from the literal provi.sion of the ordinance in instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hard- ship because of circumstances unique to the indiv- idual property under considerat and to g rant such variances only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance". It appears that the Libby tract contains in. excess of 8 acr At one time this was a tract of land that enjoyed access to Carver Road at the north and at the south boundary. However, the taking for 1494 removed the north access. I assume further that the owner in possession received damaces.for the loss of that access 1 am not satisfied that the owners cannot obtain from the County enough land to meet . the minimum requirements for the construction of a roadway suitable for single family residential pur as . In this i H p nstance, .it is not the literal provisions of the ordinance which cause. the undue hardsha.p. The literal provisions of the ordinance are intended to protect health safety and welfare. ' � Y el are. Certain minimum standards for roadway are necessary. The City might even consider condemning a roadway in order to p rovide access to the area. if there was a viable residential proposals At this time, there is no demonstration that the County has refused to.grant Libby additional land to cam lete the necessary right-of- p Y g way for a public street, / s t Mr. Geoff Olson March 25, 1980 Page Two I get the impression from reading his letter that he was hoping: that the ro ert to the south would p p Y pick up the cost of the roadway. We would most likely. be unable to assess the County for- a. roadway .o:r for utilities in this . type of a project. It is the economic constraints that constitute the hardshi p Sincehely, S BAN N` AST , C--: I , P , A . n F . ..Banni , r* JFB /me t I �� E. Variance. p Century Avenue (Libby) Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting to construct at least one house (preferably three) on a land locked parcel. Staff Is recommending approval as outlined in their report. Chairman Axdahl asked the distance from the easterly property l i n e to century Avenue. Secretary Olson said it is about 550 feet Mr. Libby said . they originally purchased the property to develop three homes on it. He questioned why the staff would recommend granting the variance for one home and not three. Secretary Olson said he felt there was a hardship caused to the applicant property by the of Ramsey County. He fel t this justification for construction of one home on the property. The Public Safety Department does have concern with having homes off a private drive as proposed . by the applicant. Chairman Axdah l asked if there was a possibility of constructing a cul -de -sac to develop the property or obtain some other access to it. Secretary Olson said the Engineering Department has proposed some alternatives for access to the site., None 'of them look too feasible because they end up with a. lot of public .street without much develop- able frontage. Comi ss i oner Fischer questioned how this would affect the overall density of..t.he Comprehensive Plan, being that only one home would develop on this large parcel. Secretary Olson said areas such as this has already been pointed out by the Consultant in the Plan Update Commissioner Prew asked if staff was recommending approval for one home under the circumstances and that the owner chooses not to go through the platting process, or is staff suggesting that this property is not suitable for subdivision into three or four lots that would make the street feasible. Secretary Olson said he did not think it would be feasible to develop the property to meet current Ci t.y standards for streets and access to it. Maybe in the future some of the lots that abut Century will wish to combine and develop the back portions along with the balance of the applicant's property Mr. Libby said because of the contour of the property, about the only place to construct a home would be along the south property line.. Commissioner Pel l i sh moved the P1 ann n Commission recommend to the Board of Ad t and A eats approval of e v ari ance t o construct o;no ho o.n; tiro si ,tebased on the fi ndiDjcs that: 4 caused, the applicant, because the a cquisition 1. There has been a hardship has sub abutting 1 and to the south by Ramsey County open • Space, stree � � of the abu g , � n a' z �� to stand al 1. reduced the feasi b� 17 ty of deg eloP ub�l g P y -the applicant's property. • ance will be met i f the applicant 2. The spirit t and intent of the ord� n _ . • paved-driveway along * i sti ng right -of -way and agrees to provides. a paved y g the maintain it.* r o t e fo1 wing cond ' Aonroy pct t • d driveway on the exi:sti ng- right -of- 1. The.. applicant shall install a pave y o the s way t eci fi cations of the City Engineer. p • to maintain: n the drive to the 2. The applicant shal city I s� gn an agz Bement • ow l owi n This agreement shall be recorded t o Standards, incl snow p g run wi th the property. • al homes on this property must meet current 3. Construction of any addition requirements for platting. b seconded Ayes all Commissioner Why tcom _ ' ` MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Commun.1v Development SUBJECT: Variances/Lot Divisi LOCATION. Ripley -~ Avenue (See `� \ nolOsed��aD� Ap�IQ�T�NER: ��s Lawn �^ria - Park Association / DATE: Apr fl 10 80 - ' . . .___. (_ � The applicant is requesting a v8rfanceand a lot division to create three lots-, for the construction Of single dwelling homes, - Site Des ti = ' ' I. The s i t e oOnS ^ tS of all ] �r part Of eight substandard l �S d ~ ,o an a vacated alley, 26 The only Structure nn the Site is a garage. ' Proposed Divisi - Th � th � .ree lots would be as follows: Lot A: 86 by |47 feet /l2 Square feet) Lot 8: 75 by 147 feet (11 Square feet) Lot C: lOO by l44 fee ` (14,400 squa � | t\ Surroundi Uc Land .Northerly: Ripl avenue ~ Easterly; Edgerton Street ` . ' Southerly,: 3fn! le-dwelling home Westerly: undeveloped Jessie Street right-of-way Past Actions' 9-6-79: Council vacated the alley on the site. 2-- 7-80: Council initiated the vacation of the Jessie Street right-of-way, on behalf of the applicaht. ° 3-6-80% The applicant withdrew his request for the vacation. ' Pl anni nq Consideration's 1 . Land Use Plan designation: RL , Residential Low Density. 2. The l ots would not exceed the planned densi in the area, because the lots exceed minimum l area requirements 3. Zoning: R -1, Single Dwelling Residence 40 Section 1005.010 (2) of City Code states that, "The minimum corner lot di -Pensi ons for single -fa;ni ly detached dwelling developments where permitted under the zoning ordinance shall be 100 feet wide at the established building setback line." 5. - Lot A would only be 86 feet wide. This would require a variance of 14 f eet or 14% of the minimum required lot width. 6. Section 462.357, of the State Statutes requires that to consider requests for variances from the literal provisions of ab ordinance two conditions must be met: a. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property b. Granting o�� such variances only when it i s demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance Public Works Con i derati ons 1 Sanitary sewer is available, but public water not. 2. A petition has been received to extend water on Ripley Avenue, from Edgerton Street. 3. A cash connection charge is required for lot B. 40 The Ramsey County Major Street Plan proposes a 99 foot right -of - way for Edgerton Street, to accommodate future widening and sidewalks. This would require the dedication of 16.5 feet from the applicant's property and would reduce the wi ath of lot C to 83.5 feet. This would require a second variance. Dedication of this property will assure an adequate setback for the future house. It may also save the City money in the future. I t i s the general policy of the County to require the City to pay for right -of -way acquisition on street widening projects. .5. On July 19, 1979, Council required a similar dedication of 16.5 feet of property along Edgerton Street for the Clausen Addition plat, which is just north of the app i cant's si 6. Ramsey% County . i s proposing to revise their Major Street Plan. They have pro - posed to reduce the future right-of-way of Edgerton Street from 99 feet to 86 feet. This would require a dedication of 10 feet from the appl icant. 7. The Maplewood Transportation Plan recommends that sidewalks be constructed on collector and arterial streets within one --half m i l e of schools, 8. Edgerton Street is. an arterial within one -half mile of Edgerton School, 2 ` . g The h ld ` -� ^ � t t �h |OI C . This would eventually join, up with a similar path that Council required fr RoSel awn Avenue �to � the south -edge of. the proposed Clausen Addition, There would ' ' ^n t'' �r� wuu b _ � '� one piece o� l oe����n tU�' p1 l co� s property that would d nO L ' have a path. T h i s parcel is a l s o owned by the Lawn Cemetery Association. ' .The majority of this parcel is a City required dra1nage ppUd.aand w probably not develop. Staff - is, therefore, proposing to include the Cost Of this section.of the path 1n 'a future City bud 'C1tf Co Staff out a survey to, the seven property owners within 150 feet of the Site. We received four replies and no objections. ' Recommendations - Approval of the two corner lot variances and 70t dfyfSfOnS, subject to the following ozndit1ons: 1. Payment of the required cash connection charge .. 2. _Oedica of lO .feet On the east Side_of lot C for the widenfng of Edgerton Street 3. tiOn of a four foot wide asphalt path on east side Of lot C. The ' ,applicant Shall deposit a cash, escrow or letter of credit for lSO% of the estimated cost with the Ui.rectVr of Public Works, to a construction of the path. 4. Drfveway access for lot C Shall be . restricted tO Rfpley Avenue Action. by CouncM,� E CIO.�a�____�_~� Enclosures l~ Location map ` 2. Property Line Map 3. Applicant's Proposal 4. Applicant's Letter 3 Gervois L a k e Lake 23 c LJLJ Ck 22 LITTLE CANA.D,A mamma= KIL MAN AV CVO NON AVE. DOWNS AVE.- SELAWN. fL 3 8 E LLWOO AV. SUMMER AVE. FEN AVE C Cl) 0 EL-DRIDGE SUR KE E AV. 10 E AV. I BELMO T 'EL 4T KILLMAN j LWOOD AVE. c e p BELL 0 AV E- cl 0 Oy- I a N G x, "eT AV E. ra 0 M 21 AVE. 57 ST. PAUL COUNT R. R, FIE N - 0 T 1 1 Z14. N rA WIN . . . . . . . . . . . . s. ERY 0-T. PAUL CE E P L.A A <�z Ff Cn. %N. - E ............. . ............. .... .......... ................ .............. ................. ........ .. ... .. ........ Al ........... 25 f T VIA CA g 177 -FT, - 30 ry 1 4,J 13 j 14 1 d r c�� f 1 ► .._ v 4 0 (14 V • i•L A }jj «..w � � � �' '•' �, ' � � � .,fi� y �, '� • "i T4 •Il T/ 31. T p - -- I& -r % 7f dN� L llv_ 0 1-7 C7 dt '07 I C E cl� 40 10 21 L4 LIJ 14 Ilk 7r, I QS 41 Or) 141 17 14 0 � �- � S �� � � � *J) � `J ( � � 1 � � ! _ Y' 9 • � ,C f'• .Y 1 �r} i j _.� M r .• �, r �s I -y �t � ' y <x a i ei td t) r,- T V.) S ctv\L' *.'. I" = 5 C) I w Q W L o A k v F-'P W VT O A 3 t� t3,jt+. o L-J ICsr ` Si alE. Aoi b 10 E 6 r �. OT C, 7 ADbt TitwA l Fr--Er 5 p F ry E. SouTN MOP -VP A % T f?` p PRop C ITY 1 ri P tpL - Y AN TH is C-j t - 0 v or L r ;3 - r DFFICE PH-ONE 612-776-6420 FCP,;&.E-:ST LAWN, MEt-40R ASSOCIATION +b' N.STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 CARL M. PETERSON. PRESIDENT STANLEY A. PALM SECRE'T'ARY AND TREASURER ARTHUR L. READY, JR. MANAGER AND ACTUARY March 10, 1980 Maplewood Pl Department 1 E. Count R;oad:B Maplewood,. mio.nnesota 55117 Attention: Geoff Olson Dear DW. Olson: After exhausting- the possibilit to vacate Jessie Street, we exhaustin now find.-it necessar to re a variance to the cit corner lot re B receivin the variance we could obtain three (3) buildable lots out of our 38,250 s feet of propert The existin homes in the surroundin area are constructed on smaller lots, man of them onl 40 feet wide. Even with the variance our corner lot would be 86 feet wide. This would allow f or a 30 ft. buildin set back on the future. Jessie "ctreet and still. till alow for a 24 -ft. wide home and 22 r ft. attached g a.a g e. Also the lot would have over 12,000 s feet, over 2,000 more s feet than y our ordinance now calls for. Thank y oa, Arthur L. Read Forest Lawn Memorial Park Ass 'n COMPLETE BURIAL SERVItCES MEMORIAL GARDENS AND TRADI I ONAL LOTS MAUSOLEUM CRYPTS CREMATORIUM COLUMBARIUM • CHAPEL. MAF,'-KERS • PERPETUAL CARE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR A CODE VARIANCE. The Maplewood Board of Ad and Appeals will conduct a p ubl i c hearing on Thursday, May 1. 1980. at 8 :15 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Maplewood Municipal Building, 1380. Frost Avenue, PETITION INITIATOR: Forest Lawn Memorial Park Association 1800 Edgerton Street Maplewood, Minnesota 55117 REQUEST: A variance and 1 o t division to create three lots for the construction of. single dwelling homes. PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS: Lots 1. 2 3, and the north 27 feet of Lot 4 and 19, lots 20, 21, 22, Block 1 , 1�\i ngs Addition to the City of St. Paul ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER ARE INVITED TO ,ATTEND AND BE HEARD If you have questions or would like fur -her information, call Geoff Olson at 770 --4550 ai I D. Variances -- Ripley Avenue (Forest Lawny Secretary - 01 son s ai d the appl i can t i s reques ti ng a * vari ante for 1 of width to construct single dwelling homes. Staff is recommending approval as outlined in their report. Art Ready, Manager of Forest Lawn, questioned the installation of the pathway as outlined in the staff report. He could not see installation of this section of the pathway until the remainder is installed u Ed erton awn to Rosel a p 9 Secretary Olson said there is an alternative the Commission could consider., have the applicant provide a cash escrow for future construction of the pathway at the same time the balance .would be constructed. The Council hand'l ed Val l eyvi ew Estates in much the same manner Commissioner Fischer asked if staff felt additional variances would .be necessary for setbacks and so forth. Secretary Olson said he did not think additional variances would be necessary- Commissioner Fischer said she thought the Commission should recommend that no setback vari ances wi 11 be permi tted on these. 1 ots . Commi ss i oner Prew said he did not think the Commission should restrict the developer at this time. If, in the future, the developer would wish a vari ance -he would have to go through the proper procedures at that time. Commissioner Fischer said these lot widths appear to be adequate h that building d i n q 9 g placement can be made with no additional onal setback variances required. The P ann ng Commi s . • variances -sub 'ect to the followLnq conditions : 1. Payment of the required e red cash connection charge 9 20. Dedication of .10 feet on the east side of lot C for the widening of Edgerton Street 30 Construction of a four foot wide asphalt path on the east side of Lot C. The applicant. shall deposit a cash escrow or letter of credit for 150% of the estimated cost with the Director of Public Works to assure cons true ti on of thie path. 4. Driveway access for lot C shall be restricted to Ripley e y Avenue p Commissioner Ellefson seconded Commissioner Prew said he was opposed to the requirement for the construeti.on of the pathway as outlined in condition #3. Voting: Ayes - al 1 P ;1 ,f• s t� MEMORANDUM TO • City Manager y A _ } C '. FROt"I - Director of Community Development ` C �����'� SUBJECT: Street and Alley Vacation~� yi APPLICANT: Arnold P f a r r � • �`' i , ..... _may l • ' DATE • • M a r c n 19 , 1980 J� , Request Vacation of a port - =on of Claire Street, extending approximately Clarence g pp e1y 160 feet east of T ence Street. the alley-abutting : he applicant is also requesting vacation of that portion o r the east property p p p y 1 � ne of Lot. 11 , Block 10• Site Description I. Location: See enclosed map. 2. Existing land raise: The street and alley rights -of -wa y p 330 are undeveloped, and 20 feet wide, respectively. Propose Land Use The app has requested the vacations to create a buildable residential Lot 11 Block � let. 10 i s presently 6400 square feet i n area, with frontage on Clarence Street of 68 feet. The requested vacations would increase the lot area. to 11,220 square feet, with 95 feet of frontage. Surrounding Land Use North: The app property and the northerly portion of the sub •ect - a 11 e � y right-of-way. These parcels are zoned M-1._ Light Manufacturing and p 1 ann d for Rh, Resi deviti al High Density. - Eas t: An undeveloped segment of the Claire Street right-of-way nd a substandard t lot 12 lo 1 y t bock 0) zoned Mp-1 , Light Manufacturing and planned anned for Rh Residential Hi Density . g South: Railroad right -of --way. West: Clarence Street. Across Clarence, undeveloped land, zoned M-1 Light Manufacturing t g g nd planned anned for Rm, Residential Medium Density. Past Acti on-s January 3, 1980: City Council approved a request t b G p� q y 1 e Rehnberg to vacate Curve and Claire Streets west of Clarence. 'h ` p ^ .C. ha . pter 4l2.85l of Minnesota Statutes authorizes the Cit to Va. ^ ate 8ny Or any part thereof alley, street" public grounds, public way n �~� ne 1f fu appears in the �interest of the public t0 SO, ^ -' —" '~' ~ ~ '�"' '' Public Works Considerati ]. A 30 foot drainage eas8ment centered on 1he`ex�Stfng rfght-of-way, should be retained the entire length Of Clafre St if Vacated. ' 2. Water.dnd Sewer are available along Clarence Street.. ' 3 Claire Street would not be feasible . . , � �O oonStruCt.as the full cost would have� t0 be assessed to one side. Ana lys 1 s. . In reviewing the applicant/S ' / ��" Staff concluded that the entire Segment of the Claire Street. right-of-way, bet should be considered for vacati-on.. w Clarence Street and Bi70�Dgh80 (undeveloped) Access to existing and Proposed development in this area can be adequately Served Easterly extension of Claire Street would dead end, unless Birmingham / Street were also to he 1nl `V8d. T0prOVe08Dt Of Birmingham is unlikely as it ]d bfS8Ct an exist�ng City park. �"" The , subject alley segment, likewise, serves no public purpose. The alley does not serve as o Se.condaryaccesS to the applicant's Dropertv. North of the subject segment, the alley functions as a private dr�Ve'fOr t�~ adjacent apartnent�. Recomi I. Approval of the requ street and ! alley vacations, subject to retaining a 30 foot drainage easen*ent, centered on i existing Clair � Street r ight-of- ' A is based upon the finding that the subject street and alley segments � . have no public purpose and are in the interest -~ f the public to vacate. II. The City Council should consider vacating the renaainder of the Claire Street right-Of-way from 81rminghom�west to the ap�lfcant east property "^ line subject ` re taining a 30 foot drafnag8 'easement, o�ntered on the existi Clai J This recommendation is based upon the finding that the subject street serves no public purpose, would be cost prohibitive to construct fs �her�for� in the best interest Of the public t0 vacate. " " " Enclosures I. Location Map 2. Property Line Nap 2 Ko e1n7on lop, (7 Ar e N 3 Z lot Est k`A ?� 4k K HLMAN AVE. cro ROAD 0 GERVAIS Z 0 0 4- RADA KO+4LMAP cr < z ui C 4n ui 1 34 EDGEHILL RD. G 5 DEMON j A E-tu w E•2 0 �ROOX • wc AV E- c S EXT I E W ' L A V oF No7�,=f E vi =Kl �= AV At$ A 'i % -- 'r , --T�_. % SHFR;:�Wpq Awci A V COPE COPE D LA R K LARK AVE. St T LARK AVE. V) > y C-9-V �LT- [LAURIE ILRD. ,0 F z LAURIE --Ro, [LELAND] z Q> 0 w , LAURIE JUN AVE. R E::: Lc: i r E: KE It ir U RKE CZ: A =VE OU kKE A ELDRIDG A� E 44 PUBLIC WORK W L I MON 64 > 41ff u n llr]Fl ARMLDWARR T., V. FTTGNIERL T RL -ET/ALLEY VACATION 25 U.1 J� [a FRISBIE AV r. 0 PH IA v 62 SKILLMA 28 �k- L - ----------- Z r ck 44 CIA t4i W Wr- h e f i e d fy LcA-e SOP UA PRI [CE AV AV 1 IF rl 6 1 ------------- I ST. Rai it /* A E TZ _A; id or ........... ell_ ` � �q...z�l4 rc'l.'Yr w?•�.Y::ja��..n +•,.w.. I`.. .. �� ' /r -___ - - w�,.e { -.. v , 1.4-P Ov- 411 1 Ilk WN i 7 .,,> rte+, �``' � t '` , r P FAR P E r i ri a ri E e street/a] I e vacations REQ -; 2. :Propert Line Map Vacations re b applicant Vacat'Ons su b staff �iY, 1 10 v NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING STREET VACATION AND ALLEY VACATION Notice is hereby given that the Maplewood City Council at its meeting of Thursday, May 1, 1980 . at 8:30 P.M.. ion the Council Chambers of the Maplewood Municipal Building located at 1 380 Frost Avenue, will consider and publicly hear remarks rega ding a - proposal to .vacate Claire Street from Clarence Street to _ Birmingham Street and that portion of the alley abutting the east property l i n e of Lot l l , Block 10, Gladstone ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER ARE-INVITED TO ATTEND AND BE HEARD If you have questions or would l i k e fur uher information, call Geoff Olson at 770 -4550 B Street and Alle Vacation - Claire Street (Pfarr) Associate Planner Johnson said the appli'cant is re vacation of a portion of Claire Street and a portion of ark abut.tin alle ri Staff is recommendin approval as outlined in their report,* Chairman Axdahl.asked if there was an present who wished to comment on the proposed vacation. No one was heard Chairman Axdahl asked wh the balance of the alle was not bein vacated. Associate Planner Johnson said the balance o f the alle is bein used as. a drivewa for the apartments. Commissioner Prew moved. the Plann I in Commission recommend to the Cit Council a of the reauested street and vacat ion sub ect' to ret--aini a 30 f o o �'d Fa_IT��nri, e n t c e n Cl S--reet ht- -wa tered on th e x i -'s ti n L Approval i's based u the finj'j_ thdt. the sub j e se have 22—P LLLjiE-_x u r os e and are in the interest of the ublic to vacate. .2 Oambow Commissioner Ki she l seconded A - a11 Commissioner Prew moved that the Planninq Commi ssi.on recommends the Cit Counci-1- haul d 1-4. - greet cQn. tb, r of..�ti Cl aire S t from Birmin am west to the li�,a ca n t s � ro r t Y I in e o a cent-ered on.the exi a_iri ht- o f ay- Th'L5 jj t h S Ine e. rvpc, be co st r to construct. and i5 therefore, in the best interest of.the ublic to vacat,::,. Commissioner Fischer seconded A - all. . G -/ April 28, 1980 STAFF REPORT To: Cit Mana Barr Evans From: Director of. Public Safet Richard W. Schaller Subject: Rejection of Bid C Dat. Proposal: It is proposed that the Cit Council formall reject the bid from the Minnesota Crime Prevention Center for an Automated Police Decision Sup port S Software Packa Background: ound: In accordance with our advertiseme--at for an Automated Police Decision Support S Software Packa the Minnesota Crime Prevention Center was the onl vendor capable of meetin our specifications and sub- mitted a formal bid of $8,000 annuall for a period of thr y ears and bein annuall renewable at the option of the Cit of Maplewood. As part of our speci fications, we re that all Uniform Crime Reportin data be pro in such a wa as to conform to the re re submission to the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension CJRS 'Section. To this date, this has .not been made possible in accordance to our specifications. In fact, j ust the opposite has occurred in that we are experiencin complications with BCA over the submission of this data. This proble was brou about b the Minneapolis, Police Department and onl brou to our attention last week. Additionall a computer software packa entitled P.O.S.S.E. has within the l a st two weeks taken a tan form and has the full- support of the BCA. We have taken a new appraisal of this -pro and are currentl workin on its development with other suburban communities. In summar we feel it will be in the Cit and department's best interests if we wait a few months before an implementation of a computer s within our department. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Council formall re the bid from the Minnesota Crime Prevention Center for their Automated Police Decision Support S Software Packa RWS: j s k. .April 28, 1980 ♦- STAFF REPORT ti �.L,.0 o To City Mane.ger Barry Evans ! ` From. Director of Public Safety R. W. Schaller t • Subject: Hardware Bids -- Police Computer System 4 Proposal : It is proposed that the City Council reject the bid received from Plessey Peripheral Systems for the Police Department's Computer Hardware Package. Background In accordance with our advertisement, Plessey Peripheral Systems submitted a bid to furnish the Hardware Package for the Police Department's computer system.. After careful review and evaluation of this bid, it does not meet the specifications in several areas: 1. The 5.0 megabyte RL01 . cartridge disc drives are not both removable, thus.limiting the capacity of the system. 2. The PT -100 unit is not equivalent to the VT -100 and will not support all P.D.S.S. functions. 3o The PM- MFV11A is not equivalent to the standard D.E.C. DLVllb normally provided with the 11/03 system. Only two of the four lines are user programmable. 4. The PM - XSV21 /B -100 is not equivalent to normal D.E.C. RX02 floppy subsystem. It , cann.ot write RX01 as described. 5. The PM-- DSV11 /C is not equivalent to a normal D.E.C. RLV11 -AK. in that il., does not support RL01 cartridges, and the access . tine is approximately 60% that of D.E.C1. Recommendation It is recommended that. the Council reject the bid received from Plessey Peripheral Systems for the Police Department's Computer Hardware Package RWS : j s ,� -� R`77 Eli P J W QUOT I _:WY Rii�rlp -hera t J'a y s- S lems 8120 Penn Ave. So. Suite 156 Bloomin MN 55431 612/88-1-0190 TO: Cit of Maplewood QUOTE N.O. PS-9026 1380. Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 CUSTOMER RFQ. NO. ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE SYST-2VX/100 Computer S 23 786 t/PM-Fll/L,S9 Backplane 18 dual slots PM-SV32AP/100 64k b Mos Memor PM-bIFV 1 IA Multi function board 4-line serial I/O PM-XS721/B-100 Dual f lopp disc sub- s Dual densit 2 X 512k b PM-H29 29 cabinet /PM-DSV11/C Disc cartrid subs 5 MB fixed, 5 MB removable. Controls up to 20 MB of stora RK05 compatible function. Uses 5440 cartrid 2 P11_100 Video terminal. VT100 compatible . Includes advance video option and printer port. BC20N-25 cable, BC20N-125 cable. LAl20-AA Printer, BCO3M-25 cable DELIVERY TERMS F.O.B. T HIS QUOTATION IS VALID FOR30 DAYS ONLY, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, AND IS BASED UPON THE STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS APPEARING ON THE REVERSE BY: - (DATE) TERMS AND CONDITIONS WARRANT Y: Se. ler warrjtrf's products of its nanofacture fn � free fro - lil defects in workmanship and material (except in those cages where the materials ari° su,)phed 1b irfe Buyef) under norrnal and wopc,- use and se v( Ce tar a pe.. tod of after date of ship lent b Seller. Seller a to �repalf or replace., at the place- of manutfacture, wlVhout Char alt parts of said products WhICh are returned, for on, to Seller facto, 1 W y V I th In the anpi I if- ,41ar rifliv od , prov( O'er,] S Ur ti In 5% on, d,sclosec tr, Phe satistrictior of Seller that the defects are as above spec- ified and providea aiso t1,w-J* 'j.he e. p1ment t.35 ­,ut bteii a"err.l Of, oll;her than with Seller's authori.zation and b Seller's approved croce- dures, sub tsusx--, irnioro.zoer main.-ten,anCe, ne z ence%, L-j ci. y exsSive CUrre-n! or Otherwise, had its seriif numlbier or g P seal 0,r an part t mi hereof a!te�ed, d%efaced or rern(yveo. Equq).rnent or of nior-,-Seilier i m a c c i d e n t , d?,1i31 anuf--lure, not incorporaled into Seiler's equipment at 'tie Sellers f a r , t 01- S h 3 1 I t be a n d ; s I h , e r - - ­ 0 y e x C I W e d 1 , r m i t n , e P r o v i s!o. n s of t h i s w 3: r a'n t v "Its W3?1*311111t Is in lieu of all other WWranbes, expressed) or Impheet, IncitX"In '141hose of nierchan'labilit or fitness 11,Dr ptuirpose. DELIVERY: Unless provided oln the face hereon pncssf�ssior! to ali ealujrttrent shall be deemed to pass to Bu upon deliver to the carrier at point Of the BU to asl 311 f1silk's Ot loss aned, res�ponsi t 11ity fair obtainin and payin for insurance and ne with the carrier or insures- or- both In tt e. event of m s-Oediver loss of d,3ma re -less cf the fact that Insurance may have be en secured b tne Seller at Bu re Tole %to all c D ment s , a remaiin W,,th Seiler fv-,r secl,,ity pwposes as col diti o na I vendor until the purchase, P rice thereof has been paid in, fuli. Fiu shell rw.1tif Stiler in writin tfvf tc all snor s within 10 da from receipt of shipi-nent. Seller will not consider an claims maae 3fte uhit per?od. Selier shaii riot be liabl-e foi- dela in i-lelicr or failure to manufacture, due to causes beyond its reason-able con- troll such as acts of Godi, 4 or omissions of Civ"I or rnshzary authortt pjN ort ties. fire, strikes, fl000s, epidemics, q uarantine, restrictions, no -t5, war. dela in transportalti-Dri, car shorU and inabiirz,� utue to cause,:; 14-leyond 'Is reasonable control to obtain necessar labor, m 3"eria is, or C . 14 y sLch dela tie date of dehvef shall be extendkc-'d for a period e to the b reason of the manufacturin faCt i it"Jes. !r. the event 'I a n . $# time lost dela Seller S.110111 have the ri to Cance! an order, placed of to rett...'se or to dle!40- Urwa shipment. thereof for failure of Bu to meet promptl p�,! rriwts due the Seder of, an otrier ieasonat,10 reCfUlrelMerite b the Scher or for art acts or ornissions of Bu which dela Seller's performance. PAYMENT: Oriless staoka.A. on (h-n face of this docurnent. lerms of pa shall be NET 30 da from dalL te of shipment. Se'ler ma at an liane M.Nen, In its opiMcri, the finar:!--tal condittor, of ,-e 1_1>u v;�irrants, e,,1.i-*%er :.flter or suspend credit and dela deliver unti such time as the revised term. s are met. Pro rata pa are due from Bu as sint �.)Tmenls are ma-je b Seller. If the work to be performed hereunder is dela 1 4 4 i '' - n tlt purichase ild ir i ce e a n%d per-critta of. tornp letipn. .5' -al I. L�e made bdsed ot. SALES OR SIMILAR TAX EES: Prices do not Include Federal, state or local taxes. now of hereafter enacted, applicable to the g :�ds : old, which tax or taxes will be added by Seller to the sales prices where Selief has the le cbil to collect same. andwill be paid b Bu unless &j provides Seller w;th a Proper tax-exerription cer"Wicale. DUTIES: On sales to points outside of the United States. all export duties, licenses. and fees which ch Seller is re to pa will be pa b the Bu in. addition to the price q uoted herein. PATENTS: Selier a to defend Bu at Seller's own cost and expense. in an 'suit or proceedin in connection with an alle (otherthan an alle based on a combinatic-.-.n of Seller's equipment with other equioment and Buyer hereb indemnifles Seeller a an liabilit based on a claim of contributory infrin atismi g . fj-,om sucn combinat-,on) that the e purchased hereunder United States Lettasrs Patent owned b others, provided, kowever. thi&t Seller is pro.imptl notified in writ ri of an claim of Infrin and furnished with all papers received in connection therewith.- prowedecl. furt'her. that the Seller shall have sole direction and control of an negotiations or of any suit I it wh*ch ma be , brou wd that 'he Bu assist the Seller in arl wa re b the attorne of the Seller in its defense. If Bu use of such I eqvipmen-1 shall be L prevented b permanent ;n based on an al le infrin e n', L Seller shall have the ri to substitute for the infrin e othei equall suitable e or at Seller's option obtain for Bu 'Y'Oe ri to continue the use of such equipment, or at Seller's option take back such equjpment, and re efund an sums Bu has pa!d Selief therefore. less a reasonabie amount for use, darna or ob>olescence. No patent 'indemnit whateyer a forei patents is g ranted b the Seller am Seller does not a to hold Bu harmless for sale or use abroad. The fore states the entire liabilit of the Seller for patent infrin b said equipment or a . n part thereof.If an materials shall be .manufactured or sold b Seller to meet Bu particular specifications, Selier shall nave no liabilit under this provision. and Bu a to defend, protect, and save harmless Seller against all suits at law or in equit and frorn and a all expenses, loss, liabilit dama claims, and demo-nds for actual or alle inflin of an United States or forei patent and to defend an suit or action which ma t>e brou a Seller for an alle infrin because of the manufacture or sale of the materials covered thereb CANCELLA.11ON OF ORDERS: Orders accepted b the Seiler are subject to cancellat= upon written notice b the bu onl with the copsent of the Seller and upon pa of reasonable cancellation char whi4ch shall take into account expenses alread incur*red and commitments ma&-G b the S and an loss of profit. GENERAL: An of the terms or provisions of Bu order which are not expressl contained herein shall not be bindin On the Seller and shall .not be considered applicable to this sale. This a expresses te entire understandin of the parties with reference-to the sub matter hereof., and no a modif or supplementin the terms of this agreement shall be valid unless in writin and si b the parties. An assi of this a or of art ri hereunder, b the Buver without written consent of the Seller shall be void. Unless otherwise specified b Bu or Seller as below provided. equipment shall be shippec: in standard commercial packa When special, m or export packa is required, or, in the. opinion of the Seller, re under the circumstances, the cost of the same, if not set forth, will be separatel !evolved. Bu will assume compete responsibilit for compliance with local laws and ordinances. obtainin all permits, licenses, authoriza- tions or certificates re b an re bod for the inst3lialion or use of the equipment. In no event will Seller act as Bu repre- sentative or a in these matters. If this contract indicates that it is a g overnment contract or a g overnment subcontract, it is sub to all applicable g overnment laws and re includin those attached hereto. -P I e o-.- un. e Peripaeral WIT z5 8120 Penn Ave. so. Suite 156 Bloomin MN 55431 612/881-0190 TO: ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE PQJ013-AX RT-11 V3B. Sin User License with docuRentation . .. ....... and binaries on flopp media. With support services. PM-DKAll Disc cartrid 2 1 Monthl Maintenance (Normal hours 8 AM 255 to 5 PM, Monda throu Frida located at the above address), 3 1 Installation (Includes 30 da on site $1,860 warrant NOTE: Plesse Peripheral S does not provide for a direct lease. If additional maintenance is necessar it can be arran throu a third part and Pl Additional cost for 44" Cabinet. $ 635 . I DELIVERY 60 - 90 da ARO TERMS Net 30 da F.O.B. Irvine, CA THIS QUOTATION IS VALID FOR 30 DAYS ONLY, UNLESS �` OTHERWISE STATED, AND 13 BASED UPON THE,STANDARD. REVERSE BY: 4/10/00 TERMS AND CONDITIONS APPEARING ON THE MMONS T E R WX S AN. D C 0 h WARRANTY: Seller warrants products of its manufacture to be, free I trorl"; def-ects in wo.,krnanship and material (except in th cases wtier 1 h e materials are su b t1he Bu under normal and proper use and service to, a pctiod of after date of shipment 1by Smiler. Seller a to repair or replace at the p1,Ljc,-e of manufacture, without a ll paartr, of staid pro which 'are t'� for inspection, to Seller's factor Within the applicat),le w�jj-ran q',d, provided such ins�De_ dtisclosCs to the satisfaction of Seller that the defects are as gabove sper�• ified and rrovided also th?.t Itie ec)ujPmen1k h-is not been altered or repaired e ther than with Seller' <authorization and by Seller's appro edproce P I s V CC to MISUSt! IMpfor dures, sub 0.jer Maintenance, neRilgerice, of accioent, dama b excessive current or otherwise, had its serial number or seat or an part thereof altered, defaC­ed or removed. E of non-Seller r-nanufacture not incorporated into Se ller's equipment at t he Seller's factor shall be and is herf=b excluded from the provisions of iLhis warrant This was,rant is in lieu of all other w3ruintiess, expiressed or implied, includin those of merciiantrib'Ji or fitness fol- purp DELIVERY: Unless otherwise provided on the face hereof, Possession to all e shall be de.erned to pass to Bu upon deiNer t© the carrier at point of shipment, the- Bu to assume a ll risks of loss and respons. for Obtainin and pa for insurance and ne with the carrier or insuref or both the event of rnl S-de, I i ver loss or dama re of tf.e fact that Insurance ma have been secured b Coe Seller at Bu re Title to all equipment shall remain with Seller for Security pumoses A s conditional vendor until Vie PurcNase -price thereof has be K-i paid in full. Bu shall notif Seiler M Writin relative- to an shof tap g es within ILI da frorn receipt of shipment. Seller will not consider an Claims made after that pterlod. Seller shall not be liable for dela in deliver or faililre to rinartufac-ture, due to Causes be its reasonable con- trol such as acts of God, acts or omissions of civil or Imilitar authority, priorities. fire, strikes, floods, epldernICS, Q U31`311!tine, restrict-ons. riots, dela in tr3nspor,3tIcrj, car shorta�,7es, and Inabilit due to ca' <1 uses be its reasonable control to obtain necessar labor, ma'tertals, or , manufacturin g fact lities. In the event of an%/ sulch delay, the date of deliver shall � extended for --: period equal to the time lost b rcason of the dela Seller shall have the ri to canlciF.11 an order placed or to refuse or to.eleln the shipment thereof for failure of Buyer to meet promptl p ments due the-Seller or an other reasonable. re established lb the Seller or for an acts or omissions of Bu whicn deli 14ys Seller's performance. PAYM.ENT: Unless stated otherwise on the face of this document, torms of pa shall be NET 30 da from date of shipment. SOler ma at an time w4en, in its opirtion, the financial condition 04 the Bu �•airants, either alter or suspend credit and Wa deliver until such time as the revised terms are met. Pro rata pa are d from Bu asslhip'ments are made�b Seller. If the wofk to be performed hereurder is dela y tj m. -Me - astd­o-n- the P * turchase--prtc-ex. and-the - SALES. OR SIMILAR TAX'S: Prices do not Federal, state or locat taxes. vow or hereafter enacted, appil-cable to the g oods sold, which tax or taxes will be added b Seller to tine sales prices where Seller has the le obli to collect same, andwill fie paid b E.iu unless Bu provides Seller with a proper tax-exemptio certificate. DUTIES: On sales to points outside of the United States, all export duties, licenses, and fees which Seller is re to pa will be pa b the Bu in addition to the price q uoted herein. PATE : Seller ag to defend Bu at Seller's own cost and expense, in an Suit or proceedin in connection with an allegation (otheithan all alle based On a cornbination of Se114r's e with Other equipment and Dw hereb indemnifies Seller a an ahaWlIt based on a clairn of contributor infrin arisin from such combination) that the e purchased hereunder infrin United Stites Letters Pa te I nt owned b others, provided, mwever, theat Seller IS promptly notified' 'in writin o . f an 63ini of infrin and furnished with all papers received in Correction therewith, prc,'vided, further, theit, the Seller shaill have sole 6.111'rection and control of an ne or of an suit Which may . be brou &nd that the Buyer sliall assist the Seller in an way required b the attorne of thte Seller, in its defense. If Bu use ofsuch equipment shall be vr,iented b Perma-rient in-unction based on an affle Infrin Seller shall have the ri to substitute for the infrin Y e Other equally Suitable ecK`-ipn-ient, Or at Seller's option obtain for Bu tl~e ri to continue the use of such equipirritnt, of at Sellers option take + back such equipment, and refund an sums Bu has paid Seller therefore, less a reasonable amount for use, dairra 01 r obsolescence. No patent indemnit whate-ver a forei patents is g ranted b the Seller and Sel I er does not a to hold Bu harmless for sale or use abroad. The fore states the entire liabilit of the Seller for patent infrm b said e or an part thereof.If an materials shall be manufactured or sold b Seller to meet Bu particular specifications, Seller shall have no liabilit under this Provision, and Bu a to defend, protect, and save harmless Seller a all suits at law or in equit and from and a all expenses, loss, liabiliqf, da-mai claims, and . demands for actual or alle Infrin of an United States or forei n patent and to defend an suit or action which ma be brou a Seller for an alle infrin because of the manufacture or sale of the materials covered thereb CANCELLATION OF ORDERS: Orders accepted b the Seller are sub to cancellation upon written notice b the bu onl with the consent of the Seller and upon pa of reasonable cancellation char which shall take into account expenses alread incurred and commi"ents made b the Seller and an loss of profit. GENE SAL: An of the terms or provisions of Bu order which are not expressl contained herein shall not be bindin on the. Seller and shall not be considered applicable to this sale. This a expresses the entire understandin of the parties with reference to the subject matter hereof, and no agreement modif or supplementin the terms of this agreement shad be valid unless in writin and si b the parties. An assi of this a or of any ri g hts g hts hereunder, b the Bu without written consent of the Seller shall be .-...sold. Unless otherwise specified b Bu or Seller as below Provided. equipment shall be shipped in standard commercial packa When special, militar or export packa is required, or, in the opinion of the Seller, re under the circumstances, the cost of the same, it not set forth, will be separatel involved. Bu will assurne complete responsibilit for compliance with local laws and ordinances. obtainin all permits, licenses, . authoriza- tions or certificates r b an regulator bod for the installation or use of the equipment. In no event vall Seller act as Bu repre- sentative or a in these matters. If this contract indicates that it Is a government contract or a govemment subcontract, it is subject to all applicable g o' veMment laws and re includin those attached hereto. MEMORANDUM TO : City Council FROM � : Barry R. Evans, City Manage SUBJECT Cable T.V. DATE : April 25, l98O , 'fderatfO | the Joint P Agreement Ia� attaching agaiD for your cons . which u had tabled while we determined whether Or not it � woul b e possi ble to also. ent in to a territory with Roseville. I am also attachinga letter from the City Manager of RO�evflle which i nd i cates ' whey it would noL be feasible to enter their proposed terrtory. I would point out that even though might b � ug we m g � D a separate territory from 'K0Sey1|/e 1� is still possible for us to have the same franchisee. I might further add that even if we were in the same territory � w w pos3ible end up with different franchises. Even with a differ f.anch1se it is still possible to have interconnections between the two so that `the Maplewood citizens who are in the Roseville School District could have an opportunity to pick up any appropriate pr0granxning ,.As it relates to the Joint Powers Agreement, the oltfeS of White Bear Lake, Oakdale,, North ��. Paul and Mahtomedi have approved it. JB --- �a� ---'---- _ ��� r • j �c;ss r y Marclh 1.19 1�._180 , `.: ' , " Cou-ncii ;Ad d Maple woo d North St Paul e IOJ ear Lake MCI .-.*L t e Pear Torl,%7 n sh *1 T.) V a d n. a 2. s .lei ah S Pik Lake m ake Elmo LIttle -%"ar-laada 4 Nort'j�,* ak s e in M U_ C ri "M - onths J"' .1here har _ ; a C t v -917 Y in Ouz% a-14rlp—r-A c3 't ab I i s h e n t o za, I Te I e v s o I n the eL _A • A- 4- Ma be ar,,Tare t1nat o. a I d -6 . - Ct -4- erri -- ( in r. - -D r o p o s e c.L a C , L a b ;A J_ rc-1 r i 3 - c C ly ad J a c rv, h Cj C in 11 r. L 2. ea S TO U . L e x C p t a o n o, f �`� n e a -pc-) c- a n C1 tz I' t h t h e 3 ` trhat was -N e tom? Bp_'..r-Tho tot an d 1,40-10"an.c.0 "t C:X Z:p • ­L A, ,i]. ini n J C' ys ­ COj a"c"r,n'" o cis, - ar r�-i..D sn LO! : .1 I L t h te. a f f e c t r2d c o mm u n1 6 a�rA alt(!-ArMative there havt_a. a oumo-:3'r. oi. -L It 3 1 c n% % S u ?, F t u - r , Z -j- A. 1 0. C. C 1 -1 - z S n.�i :''t I U J_; .7 1.. Y (-'V f Poslpv-� 1 w C d TL 'A Y v e c o nw-, i 9, t e. rn Pamse 0 11 -A- n. 1. i th e s *sdn of rlamsev Co u rn tv r vie. ha s r, j -L. A. v) I -L .3 s •cu, -s r- s a n d n a d. -1 -i 0 a cr I 75 cia ­101 -L %_ , J. o rt c o f C a,, I e 0 s r. c o T= , e c e. d It h D 0 S 4 A_ `h o,-:; c, c rn i ! r-Y i:, a,t o *oi b r e a I in. ci r a r a zi r v '117e.L o, orv> Of C -w ;-i s c a in 1" %-3 three- e- e, i- s t -f-, - . 0 1 1 � (I lk 4 It V.,v - .., 4- -eN -, J_' P r 0 P Y 0 f -3 V n o th k�� C� > L j- eT'" ".'L' T' I Cj, t r aul u g h T,,."h t e Bea Ma o l ci u y Y1 �w .0. It ni 0 -a i,% d i ai -v e I j A r T) :1.. "s c). e 4 p W C C � : 1-Y A. L k -- --) -,- v •b J I to e--- z t • 4 UP r% -) I irn, a n d­> CIN'i �,'Tp "I'l I I C _1 S) 131, ea �JA 4 -r- t 41 JI It v Ij v 0 #u r ccj.wn v fl. 0 U L d t a C V 250 Miller Avenue White Bear Lake, M in n(C-1.sota '55110 Phone ( 612) 429. -5367' Police and Fire Emer Phone 4,29-3355 '77 a IF 40- A 6 m: n S t r Ev t. v e of f i W I B 5. r C'r'l w o o d 0 a3<'• d a *L el m ake Elmo LIttle -%"ar-laada 4 Nort'j�,* ak s e in M U_ C ri "M - onths J"' .1here har _ ; a C t v -917 Y in Ouz% a-14rlp—r-A c3 't ab I i s h e n t o za, I Te I e v s o I n the eL _A • A- 4- Ma be ar,,Tare t1nat o. a I d -6 . - Ct -4- erri -- ( in r. - -D r o p o s e c.L a C , L a b ;A J_ rc-1 r i 3 - c C ly ad J a c rv, h Cj C in 11 r. L 2. ea S TO U . L e x C p t a o n o, f �`� n e a -pc-) c- a n C1 tz I' t h t h e 3 ` trhat was -N e tom? Bp_'..r-Tho tot an d 1,40-10"an.c.0 "t C:X Z:p • ­L A, ,i]. ini n J C' ys ­ COj a"c"r,n'" o cis, - ar r�-i..D sn LO! : .1 I L t h te. a f f e c t r2d c o mm u n1 6 a�rA alt(!-ArMative there havt_a. a oumo-:3'r. oi. -L It 3 1 c n% % S u ?, F t u - r , Z -j- A. 1 0. C. C 1 -1 - z S n.�i :''t I U J_; .7 1.. Y (-'V f Poslpv-� 1 w C d TL 'A Y v e c o nw-, i 9, t e. rn Pamse 0 11 -A- n. 1. i th e s *sdn of rlamsev Co u rn tv r vie. ha s r, j -L. A. v) I -L .3 s •cu, -s r- s a n d n a d. -1 -i 0 a cr I 75 cia ­101 -L %_ , J. o rt c o f C a,, I e 0 s r. c o T= , e c e. d It h D 0 S 4 A_ `h o,-:; c, c rn i ! r-Y i:, a,t o *oi b r e a I in. ci r a r a zi r v '117e.L o, orv> Of C -w ;-i s c a in 1" %-3 three- e- e, i- s t -f-, - . 0 1 1 � (I lk 4 It V.,v - .., 4- -eN -, J_' P r 0 P Y 0 f -3 V n o th k�� C� > L j- eT'" ".'L' T' I Cj, t r aul u g h T,,."h t e Bea Ma o l ci u y Y1 �w .0. It ni 0 -a i,% d i ai -v e I j A r T) :1.. "s c). e 4 p W C C � : 1-Y A. L k -- --) -,- v •b J I to e--- z t • 4 UP r% -) I irn, a n d­> CIN'i �,'Tp "I'l I I C _1 S) 131, ea �JA 4 -r- t 41 JI It v Ij v 0 #u r ccj.wn v fl. 0 U L d t a C V 250 Miller Avenue White Bear Lake, M in n(C-1.sota '55110 Phone ( 612) 429. -5367' Police and Fire Emer Phone 4,29-3355 '77 Ma Council, and Officials M arch 19 1980 Pa 2 ]oi w *th us in a cooperative a to establish a Cable Communications Comm i.ssion which would have the authorit to research and recommend the g ranti ng of- a franchise to a cable compan for the provision of cable television servaces i-n our ities. commun To do this, each communit would be re q uired to enter into a Joint Powers 'A ', a draft of w hich is enclosed for y our -considerat * ion. Additionall we will be filin notification With the Minnesota Cable Communication.s Board of the prop Territor includin all of the ci invited to enter into this a Each cit should be aware that its participation is totall .up to the individual cit .and i f a. specific communit should decide to ' all cos incurred 'in establishilicr ot)o the Commission* and issuin a franchi,*se -can be recouped from the compan rituall g ranted the franchise.,..". To those of us who have been stud the q uestion- for some t-ime it is aDpare_nt that the joint venture the. most economical an AA logical T)'os ition from which to g rant a franchise, I am sure a number of y ou have not even considered the q uestion at this. point in time, If y ou desire further information -clease feel free to contact me at 429-8526 in Wh_ite -Bear 'Lake y or I am certain that mcimbears of -the Minnesota Cable Comm unit a'tions Board would be willin to providle y ou with an preparator informEltion y ou -ma deem necessar Their telephone number is 296.25Lt5o Once the Cable Service Territor has been proposed, each affected commu has a ninet period in which to o ffer comment to the Minnesota Cable Communications Board relatin to its desire to be-i or excluded from the Terri.tor If y ou wish to be a part to this venture. we would* ask . that y ou notif me in w-,#_-)itin at thg.:_1 earliest poss" le t* g Z3 3 1 D time so that w.e mi g ht be g in the len g th y and joint effort or' determinin our communit needs a u nd our mutual desires as to 'the t of IN cable service we wish to have in this area, Most cord illiv, Wi11 T s 'lam U1, y ne r Cit Man g . WSJ im Encl. JOINT AND COOPER.A7TVP AC,7EFMFNT RAMS E ASHIN C7t N,, 171?, '; C L i, E t N - C 0 m M IS S T M J N I (! - -T0 The parties to this a are g overnmental subdivisions, of the .State of Minnesota. This a is made pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 471.59. is PURPOSE The purpose of this a is to establish an or ganizat]"Lon to jointl and cooperativel stud prep and recommend for enactment a model cable communications 'franchise ordinance . to i-ts members I to anal applications for that franchise identif and recomm. end one applicant to be g ranted that franchise b its membe r's and to administer and enforce a sinale cable cati* ons C> communi fra-Achise in membe---r cit I Cies 0 Ir Ir 'kT A NI" The or created b this a shall be known as the Rams e Was h in Counties Suburban Cable Communications Com- MIS S ion MEMBERS The political subdivisions eli to e t e e Ler this a are as follows: C it y of White Bear Lake • City of Maplewodd Cit of North St. Paul White Bear Township Cit of Vadnais Hei Cit f Gem Take C*t Y I i y of Mahtomedi City of Willernie Cit .of Birchwood Cit of Oakdale Cit of Little Can I Canada C * t of North .Oaks Cit of Lake Elmo Cit of Landfall- or such other c ities ities as ! na y be approved b the participants to this a TV, BOARD Or DIRECTORS Section 1. in order to carr out the purposes of this a me'n, n t T) rt ies shall appoint a cable communications comm -,,s* 10 o wh c. shall be representative of all of the olitical subdivisions P .Signatory to th agreement The overni n bo of g g y the commission shall be its Board of Directors . Ea.ch art to this agreement • P Y g meat w�.th a popul ati.on in excess of 10 based upon the Metropolitan ' to ' P p Z n Caunczl estimate, shall be entitled to a o"nt two directors each PP of whom shall have one vote, Each party to this a reement with a o u a ° g P p 2, t ion of less than 10 based upon the Metrop olitan Council estimate . P , sh -l1 be enti.tl_ed to appoint one direotor which director shall be. entitled to one vote. The overnin body of each art _ governing Y party to this agreement shall fill any vacancies in the directors aD p ointed or _ to be app6inted by it. The directors . shall serve without corn P ensa, ti.on from the commission, but this shall not revent a member P from compensating its directors if compensation is authorized b y law, , Sect 2. The'r_ e shall be no voting by proxy, but all votes must. be cast in person at commission Y meetings b .the di rectors Section 3.y Tlie . directors of the comm .ssion shall. serve fo_- a term . of two years. The first two-year term of the director �h �' s � a 1 I. be as of the date of execution of this agreement b t . g y partzes with populations in excess of 10 000 based upon h p the Me tropo t itan Council estimate. When the overnin body of a art ' g g y party to this agreement appoints its first directors,, it shall g ive notice of such appointments to the • PP governing .body of each of the other parties to this agreement. Notice of aD _ ointment of successor directors ors shall be given to the secretary of the Board. Such notice shall include the name and mailing, of the a ' g PPo Zntee s whose Hants and address shall be deemed to be the official name and address of the appointee for the purpose of giving an notice u re ir_ ed hereunder. Y q 2. 7f; i ,Section 4. The Board may appoint an executive committee from a.ts members . The executive committee may be de�.e ated h y g the authority to manage the business of the commission during ntervals between een meetings of the board, but at all times is subject to the control ontrol and .direction of the Board. The executive committee shall. meet at the call of the chairman of the board or upon the cad.. - p �. o f tWo other . members members of the executive committee The date and . place aF � meetings shall be fixed b the ersan or arsons ea ' Y P p 11�.ng 3- . At bast 48 hours advance written notice of such meetings shall _ g all be given to all members of the executive committee b the r. y e person a�:. persons calling the meetings; ; however notice may be wave g � y w by any and all members who actually attend .. the meetings or who i g g written waiver of such notice for a specified meeting.. g. Section 5. A majority of the number of the direct r -- o s appol ° �.ed at any time shall constitute a quorum of the Board and a nta'ori Board, � -ty of tho'c appointed to the executi committee shall constitute s a quorum of the executive comni.ttee . Section 6. A director shall not be eligible to vote during any period in which the ' pol it ical subdivision appointi.n ¢ such C:) director is in default on any payments contributions or a• ments to the _ commission, V . OFFIC Section 10 officers of the Board of the commission shat c �. o n - s ist of a chairman, a vice-chairman, a treasurer and a secretary, all of whom shall be elected at the first- meetin g of the commission and at the annual meeting of the commission held in the month o -F' . each year. - 3 .Se ction 2 . The chairman shall reside at al.l. e . P m e�t�ngs of the Board of the commi,ss i.on . The vice - chairman shall act as chairman in the absence of the chai,]rman. Section 3. The secretary hall be responsible ' �' p for keeping a record of all of the proceedings of the commission and notices 1 es of meetings Section 4 , The treasurer shall have custod of the c ! y co s funds; shall pay its bills; and shall keep its financial s p inancia.l. re cords and generally conduct its financial. affairs. All checks drawn .upon . the commission's account shall require the signatures q g s of the areas- - urer and the chairman or vice-chairman. The commiss ion 4 s � ' fznan *ial books and records- shall be audited once each year, or at such cLther times as the COMI mission may direct , b an inde endent audit ':Y ' cr.. � -o ,. . off' �..e s 2. o n ate d and approved by the Beard of Directors. Section 1. Within thirty days after the execution this n o� agreement by at least three. municipali with o ul.ations in . P P excess of 10 based upon the Metropolitan Council e t P s zmate 1 the first meeting of the commission will b held at a time and place agreed to by the firs directors , Section 2. At the first meeting, as g, soon thereafter as is reasonably practical, the commission shall adopt by-laws' ; P9 p y laws govern i its procedures, includin the time lace and � ' g , p frequency. o f its regular meetings. The by-laws may be amended from time to time by a majority vote, Section 3. Special meetings of the comet * ssi.on may be called by-the chairman or by the secretary pon a written - re Y _ quest of the Majority of directors « Five da s - written no ° y toe of special meetings -4~ r tl K r .shall# be given to directors including the • 9 g proposed subs acts to be taken tip at the special meeting, g. Section 4 , Notice of sp ecial meeti h ' P g shall b g i v en to the directors by the secretary t lea • y le five days in advance and, when feasible, an agenda for such meetings � • zngs s�.all accompany the notice , Business at regular meetings need g g not be limited to matters set forth in the agenda, g • VII* POWERS , - RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF COMMISSION .Section 1. The commission shal 1 etit ' • p ion the Cable �c�rrurtun�. -� cations Board to establish a Cable Service Ter • r�tory co with the political boundaries of • - the member canmuni Section 2. The commiss shall re " - p pare and recommend a model cable communications franchise ' ord�.na.nce for enactment by its M M b=- . ; Section 3., The commission shall pre are. and recommend - P d mo del invitation for applications for cable -- • -communications franchise for enactment by its members, Section 4. The commi s s i.on shall evaluate all franchise • aPP� -�-- cations received b its members and - y shall. submit a report classifyin 9 comparinb and inter retin information _ . P g ion supplied by applicants. upon . a _ two thirds af:'Firmative vote of the Board • r of Directors , it shall identify and recommend one a licant .to be awa rded • Pp arde d a cable cajun i cations. franchise b y its members Section 5. The commission shall act or cause others to act at -their discretion in an matter regarding y the s tudy of cable communications ; the preparation of the fro • nance and nch� se ordnance other documents; evaluation of a I.a c - • PP a t�-ons ; and. the administration and enforcement of a cable. communicati franchise ns fw anch�.s ,� a* 5OM MM .r Section 6 The commission ma investi the operation of ,cable -communications s and other of subdivisxons in Minnesota and elsewhere and -the expenses of travelin and subs ismmm fence of directors in makin such investi shall be borne b the commission, Section 7. The commission ma enter into an contracts deemed necessar b - the commission to carr powers and duties'. sub to the provisions of this a Section 84 The commission ma appoint an advisory committee which. ma make recommendations to it on cable con, runic ations , Section 9. The commission ma acc g ifts, appl for and use g rants and ma enter into a re in connection therewith, and ma hold,, use and di spore of mone or propet%t received as a g ift or g rant in accordance with the terms thereof, C> Section 1C. The commis 'ma . y I submit written comments on rules I., re or le re & I in cable commun3-cat3-ons proposed b or before the Federal COMMUT"lications Commission the Min Cable Communications Board of the Minnesota Le or it t ma direct its representatives. to appear and to on cable communications befo these g overnmental bodies, Section 11. The commission ma take such action as It deems necessar prudent, and. appropriate to accomplish the g eneral P ur."M poses of the commission and it ma exercise an and other power necessar and incidental to the implementation of its powers. and Auties, sub to the terms of this a and its b WSO Section 12. The commission shall administer and enforce the franchise or franchises g ranted b its membe�rs and sh I all prepare .6 . c and recommend for enactment by its members any and all amendments to this agreement which, in the commission s opinion., will fa.cili. hate the administration and enforcement of such franchises VIII. FINANCIAL MATT Section 1. The initial financial contribution to the operation of the cornrnission by the parties to this agreement shalt as f `A. Parties to this agreement with a population in excess Of 10 ,000 , based upon the Metropolitan Council esti._ mate $1 , 00 Bit Parties to this agreement with a population ess than 10,000 based upon the Metropolitan Council estimate $5000000 - Section 2. Subsequent contributions shah.. be made by, parties • to this afire ent at such times and in such amounts as is determined by the parties by amendment of this agreement. Section 3. A proposed budget for the first year of the commis— sion shall be Drepared by the commission as. soon as ossibl.e . Budgets P g for . subsequent years shall be adopted by the commission prior to the beginning of the commencement of the year the budget covers . Section 4. The commission may expend its funds as it deeTr�s necessary and appropriate pursuant to this agreement IX, WITHDPAwAL FROM MEM BERSHIP Section 1. Any party may withdraw from memb►e in th e commission by giving written notice of withdrawal to the commission. The notice shale be in the form of a resolution of the governing body of the part *, The withdrawal shall not become effective until 00 days from the date of filing the notice of withdrawal, When the withdr of a party . does not result in the dissal.uti:on of the comma ss-� on , the party so withdrawing shall. forfeit any . y' � 77 F it has to' any of the assets of th commz.ss =i.on. . X. DISSOLUTION Section 1. The commission shall be dissolved upon the a.ffir -- mative vote of two - thirds of the members of "the Board. Section 2 In the event of dissolution. the commission shall determine- the measures necessary to effect. the dissolut�.on aria shall. provide for the taking of such measures as promptly a nd as such circumstances permit and subject to the provisions of this agreement, Section 3. Upon dissolution , the remainin g assets of the commission , after paying all. outstanding obligations shall be distributed among the then existing members in'�pro orti.on to their P previous contri- butions . All files and other mater ial.s re area P � for members shall be available to them, XI. DURATION This agreement shall continue in effect for a P eriod of twelve months fro M the date of its initial execution, and thereafter from year to year, or until terminated in accordance with the terms of r this agreement . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the political -ubdi visions have caused this agreement to be executed by their appropriate offieeps . 1 Agri 1 .21, 1980 Mr. Barry Evans City Manager 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Evans I am writing in response to your inquiry concerning the possibility of Maplewood and other communities in the northeast area joining in the Cable Service Territory as proposed by Roseville. After discussion with the Roseville Cable Committee it ap that a large number of additions to the CST would pose some potential problem. First, there is some question as to whether the Minnesota Cable Communi �- rations Board would approve - a CST to which a significant number of communities had been added late in the process. The main consideration would involve the adequate notification of co�jnuni ti es adjacent to the added communities. Should the MCCB not approve the CST at least an additionai 90 day waiting period would be required. Second, it is the of the Committee and others in the territory that the size proposed is optimum considering the communities involved. If approved, this CST, as currently proposed, would be the largest that has been approved. Should the communities included in the CST eventual become involved in joint franchising- the group size would have a direct effect on the manageability of the group. . Finally is the proposed "Ini ti tal Service Territory". In submitting the CST to the MCCB it i s . requi reed that an Ini ti tal Service Territory be proposed. The IST indicates where it is believed the first services w i l l go in. While this is not binding on any of the communities involved, the addi tion of communities that create i s l a.n.ds of high density in areas of low density does pose problems for eventual franchising, I have included a copy of a memo written by the staff of the * MCCB.: In the memo several factors are mentioned in regard to CST formations as well as suggestions for CST's. I hope this information will be of benefit. Thank you for your interest in joining with Rosevi i n the CST proposal. I f I can be of any assistance, pl ease advise. Sincerely, arses F . Andre C ty Manager Att. � 1F` 6,60 CIVIC CENTER DP-.,IVE TELEPHONE 4.4-337, MINNESOTA s5 1 13 Agri 1 .21, 1980 Mr. Barry Evans City Manager 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Evans I am writing in response to your inquiry concerning the possibility of Maplewood and other communities in the northeast area joining in the Cable Service Territory as proposed by Roseville. After discussion with the Roseville Cable Committee it ap that a large number of additions to the CST would pose some potential problem. First, there is some question as to whether the Minnesota Cable Communi �- rations Board would approve - a CST to which a significant number of communities had been added late in the process. The main consideration would involve the adequate notification of co�jnuni ti es adjacent to the added communities. Should the MCCB not approve the CST at least an additionai 90 day waiting period would be required. Second, it is the of the Committee and others in the territory that the size proposed is optimum considering the communities involved. If approved, this CST, as currently proposed, would be the largest that has been approved. Should the communities included in the CST eventual become involved in joint franchising- the group size would have a direct effect on the manageability of the group. . Finally is the proposed "Ini ti tal Service Territory". In submitting the CST to the MCCB it i s . requi reed that an Ini ti tal Service Territory be proposed. The IST indicates where it is believed the first services w i l l go in. While this is not binding on any of the communities involved, the addi tion of communities that create i s l a.n.ds of high density in areas of low density does pose problems for eventual franchising, I have included a copy of a memo written by the staff of the * MCCB.: In the memo several factors are mentioned in regard to CST formations as well as suggestions for CST's. I hope this information will be of benefit. Thank you for your interest in joining with Rosevi i n the CST proposal. I f I can be of any assistance, pl ease advise. Sincerely, arses F . Andre C ty Manager Att. � 1F` J ADMIN 1()00 ( Rev. 1 T Administration DE_jPAPZ M E N �le 1ff&ii_iiu_n_ica­t ions Board TO Members FROM W, D. Dc DATE: Januar 25, 1980 PHONE: 296-2545 SUBJECT: 'METROPOLITAN AREA CABLE SERVICE TERRITORY FORMATION: -FACTORS, CRITERIA. AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Well over half the area within the Metropolitan Council's Metropolitan U Service AreaY is alread included in approved Cable Service Territories (CSTs) and the momentu for designation. of the remainder is buildin Staf f has. prepared -this in- formal appraisal .to illustrate p ossible ossible g roupin g s of municipalities that mi con- stitute future CST proposals, and to keep the Board and others informed about the plannin initiatives of the municipalities and the irtdustr In its determinations leadin to approval or rejection 3/ of cable service territories propo'sed 11p ,the met area, the Board considers specific factors and 'criteria i,,!hich i thie . , i,,L e3.-idation of the Metropolitan Council. In additio-n. the com- 4' ."I. ,pac ,ted char t ace-1--, of the - metropolitan area' s inner, built-up area br-in into pla .,-onsiderations of concern and interest expressed b both the directl involved and the conti Diunicipalities. - It is the Board's practice, pursuant to the rules, to encoura wide publ cau-areness of cable service terr'-f-Cor 'proposals wherever in tl.,..e state the ma emer In the .metropolitan area, the assumes even more importance. , In the Twin Cit area, invitations to comment tend to elicit considerable response.. and comment, much of it revealin plans the municipalities themselves ma have about the co of cable service territories in which the ma be included, or in some cases that ma have a ne i mpact on plans the and nei communities ma be developin for different CSTs. Staff anal preparator to Boar ,decisions 1 on CSTs take all these factors, criteria and comments into consideration., The process provides some insi obviousl into the relevant olicies the Metro- P politan Council as well as into the interests of the -1-Aunicipalities. As a result, Staff is.in a position to informall and unofficiall -identif certain possible g roupin g s or -confi of municipalities within the Metropolitan Urban an Service' Area that are as y et not desi as bein within approved CSTs. The Statutes and the Rule do not authorize the Board to propose CSTs,, nor ma it modif or amend CS T. proposals submitted for its approval or rejection. These initia- tives are acknowled the prero of the municipalities and the cable co nies, But recent experience ..indicates that both g roups se%n-k su and 9 uidance in plannin for CST proposals that illustrate the re of the Board .inc lud-- in th ordinaril cited in the recommendations the Board receives from the Metro- poli tan C.ounc-11-1. OF Of CI TY 14A NAcER STATE OF MINNESOTA � -'`� _ `� 0. [ice ' Members of the Board Januar 25, 1980 Pa 42 of 9 In arrivin at the model confi that follow, the Staff has taken into con- sideration the above-mentioned . factors and criteria in the a rules, the relevant plans and reports identified b the Metropolitan Council. and the stated preferences of the municipalities where known. Staff has a lso carefull r eviewed. the full Districtin Report of the Council's Cornmunica*tions Advisor Committee and has incor- porated a •number of its f indin and recommendations Finall the Staff has brou into the process its understandin of the cable industr technical and economic re A it is emphasized that the MODEL CST confi that follow are unofficia'l su onl and should not be construed.as directive in nature. It is e xpected that the municipalities and the cable companies will g ive them further study %. and consideration pr r to submittin CST proposal malls-.in modif i1cations as the f ind i V p reason to do SO. The constitute no pre isposition for either approv or rejection b the Board or the Metropolitan Council.?� Northern Suburban GrouD No. 1 Note: A variation on this g roup mi include the addition of Coon Rapids which, althou alread part of a small CST with the nei municipalit .-)f Sprin Lake Park, mi under certain circumstances wish to consider re- ali with the above communities. ties. This mi come about if. Sprin Lake Park should opt to join, b CST revision, with the existin Fridle s or some other nearb g roup, A further variation of the above g roup mi then include Blaine. Should that eventuate, a number of.factors mi then, in turn,, su the plausibilit of addin Lexin Circle Pines and Lino Lakes to form a CST g roup of lar size and g reater potential for service. Coon Rapids 37,500 9 3.92 65 Anoka 11 Circle Pines 4 1 .89 75 Anoka 12 Lino Lakes 4 98*9 .06 13 Anoka 1.2 .Blaine 31,000 8,500 .39 68 Anoka 16 Sprin Lake Park 7,000 1 3.79 65 Anoka 16 HH/Street School Mun i c ip a -1. j Po pu lation Households HH/Acre M ires Cou nt y Dis-C-rict Anoka 1.5 ,110 5 1.125 79 Anoka Champlin 8,600 2 48 58 Hennepin Ramse 10 2 .14 21 Anoka Andover lo.., 000 2 .16 22 Anoka ll Note: A variation on this g roup mi include the addition of Coon Rapids which, althou alread part of a small CST with the nei municipalit .-)f Sprin Lake Park, mi under certain circumstances wish to consider re- ali with the above communities. ties. This mi come about if. Sprin Lake Park should opt to join, b CST revision, with the existin Fridle s or some other nearb g roup, A further variation of the above g roup mi then include Blaine. Should that eventuate, a number of.factors mi then, in turn,, su the plausibilit of addin Lexin Circle Pines and Lino Lakes to form a CST g roup of lar size and g reater potential for service. Coon Rapids 37,500 9 3.92 65 Anoka 11 Circle Pines 4 1 .89 75 Anoka 12 Lino Lakes 4 98*9 .06 13 Anoka 1.2 .Blaine 31,000 8,500 .39 68 Anoka 16 Sprin Lake Park 7,000 1 3.79 65 Anoka 16 Members of the Board . = January 25, 1980 Page 3 of Northern Suburban G No. 2 HH /Street School Municipa Populat House holds HH. /Acre Niles Count T District Roseville 33,120 12,367 1.46 80 Ramsey 623 New Brighton 23, 620 7, 368 1.68 94 621/282 Shoreview 16 300 5,500 .78 80 " 621 Mounds View 13,430 4,207 1.44 102 " 621 Arden Hills 6 2 .35 54 621 Falcon Heights 5 1,892 1.33 72 623 Lauderdale 9 ,410 961 3.48 138 " 623 North oaks 2 850. .18 24 " 621 Little-Canada 7,140 2 1.11 83 " 623 Saint Anthony 9 400 3,350 2.46 Ramse / . 282 Henn p In Note: Although geographically not aligned, North Oaks and Little Canada, because of their school districts, appear to be possibly better placed here. If this factor is not critical to the municipalities and the schools, ' reasoa -- able argument. could be _ made for inclusion of either or both with the North- eastern group described later. r F The municipa-lity of - Saint Anthony, which lies across the boundaries of two counties, has been suggested by some municipal officials as being possib _y included in this group. Another . variation .eight find Saint Anthony added by revision of the Minneapolis CST to the Minneapolis system although its partial school. district #282 association with New Brighton adds some weight to an association with the group illustrated here. Argument, too, can be made for appending to the Fridley system and the Columbia Heights CST certain of the immediately adjacent communities such as New Brighton, Mounds View, Saint Anthony and Spring Lake Park, ant gap in the midst of this group of municipal -4 A geographically signif c ties is the Federal. Government's Arsenal area which forms a relatively pop.u-_ lation --free barrier to convenient system design. It does not seriously detract, however, from. the high, economic viability of this group of munici -- palities. Also, . a number of geographic and. factors suggest the northern, bore er of this group should coincide with the northern border of Ramsey County. Members of the Board Januar 25, 1980 Pa 4 of 9 Northeast Suburban Group First Alternative 2 HH/Street School M unicipalit y P o pu lation Households IIII/Acre Miles Co unty District Vadnais*Hei 5,200 1 .35 48 Ramse 624 White blear Lake 241,400 7 7�000 1,76 7 -0 Ramse 624 White Bear Twp. 6,200 1,800 38 NIA Ramse 624 Gem Lake 400 150 .21 33 Ramse 624 Dell- 7.80 250 .,16 20 Washin 832 Mahtomedi 4 1, 150 .5 5 59 Washin 832 Willernie 650 200 2.50 52 Washin 832 Pine Sprin 190 50 Ill 15 Washin 8.32 M 27,530 8,406 .76 60 Ramse 622 North Saint Paul 12,310 3,700 1.96 82 Ramse 622 Oakdale 13,500 4,200 630 71 Washin .622 Birchwood 1,100 320 1,50 82 Washin 624 Landfall 850 350 5.84 138 Washin 622 Note: One dif f icult with this g roupin g is its sheer s ize which mi be unwield despite the. traditional affinities that cut across a number of count and school distr lines. Some concern ma be expressed b some in the inclu- sion here 'of several communities of extremel low densit (viz. Gem Lake,, Del,l Pine Sprin and parts of White Bear tov.mship) It is difficult to assi these effectivel to other teriito ries, however, and their low densities and inte locations ar a Individual development cand for an association with other, more densel populated and nearb communities, Northeast Suburban Group - Alternate Division into Subgroup s 1 and 2 HH/Street S cho ol. 1. Municipalit Population Households HH/Acre Miles Count District Vadna is �leii g hts 5- 2,00 1,650 .35 48 Ramse 624 'White Bear Lake 24 7 000 1.76 70 Ramse 624 .White Bear Twp 6,200 1,800 38 N/A Ramse 624 Gem Lake 400 150 .21 33 Ramse 624 Dellwood 780 250 1.6 20 Washin 832 Mahtoinedi 4 1,150 55 59 Washin 832 Willernie 650 200 2.50 52 Washin 832 Pine Sprin .190 50 15 Washin 832 Birchwood 1 1 100 320 1.50 82 Washin 624 Maplewood. 27, 53.0 8 406 *76 60 Ramse 622 North Saint Paul 11,310 3,700.' 1,96 82 Ramse 622 Qakdale 13 4. .63 71 Washin 622 Landfall 850 350 5,83 138 Wash in 622 Members of the Board Januar 25, 1980 Pa 5 of 9 Note: The above alternative to the Possible problem of size 'proposes a division into two sub both of which cut across count lines and violate some traditional association. The smaller of the two above g roups i more likel to probabl expand further east to include Lake Elmo. An eastward growth. of the lar g roup mi also eventuate althou it is less certain. and not as immediate a possibilit for development. Mention should also be made that Vadnais Hei has expressed a willin- g ness.at this poin to move in an direction or to g o it alone as an experimental s The relativel low densit ma alon with natural and hi barriers, militate again isolated development, Southeast Suburban G Muni Population Households HH/Street S chool HH/Acre Miles County District Newport 3 .46 36 Washin Saint Paul Park 51600 1 5 451 n 833 Cotta 46 Washin 833 e- Gre Cloud.Twp. 20,000 5,VOOO .22 46 Washin 833 400 120 Woodbur 10� 700 .06 N/A Washin 833 Denmark TW 1� 1 300 3 t 1 0 0 .15. .35 • Washin 8 ? 3 360 N/A N/A `) C ., 0 Washin 4- Note-, This groupin takes into consideration a probable future expansion into South Washin Count as well as the eventual development of cable, in the free-standin Hastin are,a, The low dens'ities evident in the above ' table are somewhat illusor in that Cotta Grove and Woodbur contain extensive land areas still under development which would not re initi service* Also,,onl the small • built-up portion of Denmark Township should be initiall considered for service, most prop- erl in associati with development at Hastings, Members of the Board Januar 25, 1980 Pa 6 of 9 X­ South Suburban Crou Mun i c i p a i l l Population Households HH/Acre HII/Street Miles Count LEM—L I It ;s chool District West Saint Paul South .-Saint Paul Lil Mendota Hei Mendota Sunfish Lake Inver Grove Hei Ea 18,650 21s300 360 7. 240 350 17,500 .20,400 7�140 7�550 2 183 1109 91 100 5,300 7,050. 2.25 2.18 .39 .36 .66 17 0 1 .29 34 107 9 r, 57 35 34 14 54 56 Dakota Dakota Dakota Dakota Dakota Dakota Dako ta . Dakota 1 97 6 197 197 197 197 199 197,191 c Burnsville 35,500 11 800 3% ./2 72 Dakota 191 Note: A number of natural affinities are evident in the above groupin althou some question ma be raised about Ea as well as the neighborin munici- palit of Burnsville which is not included in the above table's main g -roup- in Reasonable arguments could be raised for the inclusi probabl more so for Ea on of each-- an than for Burnsville because of the latter:.'s D (, .greater orientation to the adjacent T�Iinneapolis suburbs to the nor h t across the Minnesota River despite the relativel unpo*Dulated natural barrier it ,poses. Attention should be g iven al to the existin cable s oerat-. in in the four Communities of Lak p eville, Apple Valle Farmin and Rosemount to the South for possible si ns of its expansion into the area under di 9 dis cussion, Nor is an attempt made here to su an association for Sava pendin its consideration of Possible association with a future Bur nsville de ,ment or with that part of the presentl franchised but still incomplet w el built ,rest Bloomin area across the Minnesota River to the north. A the natural river bottom barrier su that a further look into the f uture ma see independent development of c able in. Shakopee and 'Pti or Lake wbich.ma provide other alternatives Members of the Board 'Januar 25, 1980 Pa 7 of 9 Western Suburban Grou i in HII/Street School Municipalit Population Households HH/Acre Miles Count District Deephaven 4,000 1 .82 50 Hennepin 2) 7 6 Shorewood 4,800 1 .42 36 Hennepin 276 Excelsior 2 1 2,6 .95 Hennep i n 276 Tonka Ba 1. Woodland 600 580 .93 61 Hennepin 276 500 .Sprin Park 1 180 .47 42 Hennep in .276 Orono 1650 750 2..7 163 Hennepin 277 7 2 .25 32 Hennepin 7 8 Minnetonka Beach 550 2 00' Greenwood 66 Hennepin 278 600 350 1.0 . H 4 11) Victoria 1 500 ennepin 276 Mound 9 3,200 .31 34- Carver 112/276* li,6 65 Hennepin 277 Minnetrista 3 1�050 9 , Lon Lake 1 550 06 17 Hennepin 77/111 1.2 58 Hennepin 278 Wa 4,200 1,600 080 60 Henn ep in el 28L4 Chanhassen 6 2,050 .16 33 Carver 1.12 Note: This g roup of communities ,.int as the are b Minnetonka presents a uni economic and desi challen to cable devel 0 pment, Most are too small for individual development, and hence su the need for cooperative efforts if all are to be served. Common Interests and relationship are stron and evident, but the problem of low to mar economic viabilit because of the, probable hi cost of con- st.ruction for the entire area demands patient and thorou stud lead- in to innovative technical approaches to both desi and financin Variations o f the above g roup mi find the Carver Count • communities of Chanhassen and Victoria* developin separatel y . toward a poss�..ble free- standin development of cable at Chaska, Chanhassents developed areas su a probabilit f or independent development, althou this - ma not be as advanta as.an-association with Shorewood to the north. Other possible variations mi include a development of several -smaller- CST municipalit groupin that mi be developed, despite the customar advanta of sufficient household numbers to increase optimum economic viabilit An combination of communities in this g eneral area poses difficul because of the natural barriers to economical construction, In order to remain consistent with current Metro' P011tan Council Polic no attempt has been nade in this report to deal directl with the.free-stand*in seven-count comm & . uni.- ties outside the Metropolitan Urban.Service A Cable s alread serve Members of the Board Januar 25, 1980 Pa 8 of 9 Farmin Lakeville, Rosemount (and Apple Valle and Jordan. A CST was approved last O coverin Stillwater Ba and Oak. Heihts. It i g s known that communities number of additional comunitie in the area have recentl expressed • 'interest ill CABLE development, and the staff has received re for information from severa . 1. Cable companies, too, are be to evidence • interest in these outl metro area communities* The Staff plans to address these opportunities for cable development as apart of its small market identification stud This anal is alread under- wa and scheduled for completion b June 30, 1980.- TdDD/blf 1/ The "that Council. defines the Metropolitan Urban Service Area -(MUSA as that portion of the metropolitan area in which governmental • a g encies should plan to suppo urban development and redevelopment." The area generall encompasses the built-up, urbanized area that includes the. core cities and the full developed suburban communities, 2/ The Cable Board has approved metro area Cable Service Territor designatio'ns that include Minneapolis, Saint Paul, Fridle Bloomin , Saint Louis Park, Jordan, Laheville, Farmin Apple Valle Rosemount, Stillwater, Oak Park Hei Ba Eden Prairie, Hopkins, Richfield, Minnetonka, Edina, Golden Valle Robbinsdale, Cr 'Ne Hope, Pl Medicine Lake Brookl Center, Brookl Park, Osseo Maple Grove, Sprin Lake Park, Coon Rapids, New Bri Columbia Hei and Hilltop, 3/ On September 14,, 1979 Capitol Cit Cable , vision, Inc. proposed a CST consist- in of the boundaries of 15 Suburban Saint Paul municipalities. with the.Metrop*olitan Council and many of t Staff, alon 110 he municipalities, recommended rejection of the proposed CST, and it was withdrawn b the proposer on Januar 11, 198 4/ The Board's statutor authorit with respect to CSTs is found • in M.S. §238.05 Subd. 6 and 7. The a rules 4 MCAR § § 4.221 thru 4*226 set forth definitions, procedures, factors and criteria, 5/ The Metropolitan Council lists as its g uides for CST consideration and recom- mendation the followi The De Framework Chapter of the Metropolitan Guide, adopted b the Council in September 1975 and revised In December 1977 The Districtin Report prepared -b the Communications Advisor Com— Mittee and adopted b the Metropolitan Council on Au 27, 1974, Members of the Board 'Januar 25, 1980 ­-"Pa 9 of 9 6/ Population, household, acrea street mile, school district and other . data is taken from publications of the Metropolitan Council and the 0 Minnesota Departments of Transportation and Education. Where available, 1980 projections are used, 7/ On Januar 21, 1980 a proposal from Harmon & Compan was received for a CST - consistin initiall of the corporate orate boundaries of Anoka, Champlin and Ramse Board action is scheduled for Ma 9, 1980.. 8/ 'MCCB interprets present CST statutes and rules to permit more than one franchise per CST. A le challen to, the Board's interpretation. was denied b Ramse Count District Court January 10 1980. 9./ Where N/A is shown in the tables., fi are either not applicable or not immediatel available. In relativel non-developed municipal units fi show a tend to be illusor reflectin for the most part lour levels of urban development arithmeticall compared with large g eographic areas., MEMORANDUM TO: C Manager FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Project No. 78 -19, Hillcrest Development Project Financing DATE: April 24, 1980 Introduction At the April 3, 1980 meeting, Council tabled action on a request by Hillcrest Development Company to reduce the amount of cost to be borne by Hillcrest Development for construction of the above project. Council asked that staff review the cost-sharing alternatives and clarify the options available to the City for financing that portion of the project not paid by the developer. The following is a review of the cos t--- sharing arrangements presented to date. The proj ect presented in the original feasibility is substantially different from that ordered by the Council. Staff has revised the cost figures of the various proposals to account for this change to make them directly comparable. History of Project Project 78--19 was initiated by the City Council at the request of Hillcrest Del,.7elopment Co. Hillcrest Development Co. was required to guarantee ,payment of cost for the feasibili study, Public Works Department r?cords indicate a history of requests for utility service to this property At the time of the request, staff expressed concern that there was no firm devei"Lopment proposal for property in question and design of the utility system could be best accomplished in coordination with development of the area. During preparation of the study, Hill-crest Development :submitted copies of a proposed development plan incorporating single . family homes on the west portion of the property with warehous=ing to the east. No formal application for preliminary plat approval for the single ' f ami.ly development has been made. In addition, the owner has gone on record against a zoning change to single family for this portion of the groperty. The public improvements were developed assuming property would be developed according to this proposal, On September 6. 19 79, the Council held a public hearing on the project at which concern was expressed against the proposed. assessments to neighboring property and to dev.el opment of .t ie area in general. The project, to provide services for the Hillcrest proposal, included Action by CoUrlai 'i JI z j .r �.. ..e.�.aee•� 4 construct 'ion of a sanitar sewer throu the propert water-main on McKni Road from Laxpenteur to the railroad tracks and the complete up of Ho Avenue from Sterlin Street to Centur Avenue. At the hearin Hillcrest Development Co. re the up of Ho Avenue be dropped from, the pro as the warehouse proposal was no lon viable. After the bearin the Council ordered the improvements contin on the Developer pa his portion of the cost under the terms of a Development A The Council indicated the cost to be.paid b the-Developer was to be based on a methodolo as outlined in the staff report presented at the bearin Hillcrest Development is now askin to hav*e their portion of the cost reduced. W - Feasibility Study Proposal The feasibilit stud prepared .b Short, Elliott, Hendrickson and and recommended b staff assumed the financl g of the Associates,, in pro would be based on front foota The developer would pa his proportionate share of -the project based on the len of the pipes throu or frontin his propert This method is consistent with current practices and past assessments for similar undeveloped properties. No credit for oversizin the sanitar sewer was .proposed, Front Foota to.be Paid. b Developer Front Foota to be Paid b Others MARYLAND AVE. fw z This concept results in an estimated total cost to the developer of $369 $343,000 for sanitary sewer installation and $26,000. for waterma.in construction. The City would be required to finance the remaining $221,000. The developer objected to this cost-sharing arrangement as he felt it placed an undue burden on him because the proposed sewer did not provide direct lateral service along the entire length and the sewer was intended to serve a larger . area than his property. Council Adopted Proiect After presentation of the feasibility study, the Council and the developer requested staff to investigate a method to provide credit to the developer for overs izing of the sanitary .sewer.. Staff prepared an a1ternative f inancing proposal. as detailed in - the staff report dated August 24, 1979. The staff report, based on a hypothetical situation used the minimum cost to establish a sanitary sewer system to serve the developer's property. This hypothetical system was a modification of one which was proposed by the developer. The developer would be required to pay, as a base amount the estimated cost of the minimal system to provide the same Level of direct service as the proposed trunk facility. The remainder of the sewer cost .For Pro; ect 78 -19 would be prorated proportional to the area served, This methodology results in a developer's share of $233,000, $207,.000 for the sanitary sewer and $26,000 for the construction of watermain. The City would be required to finance the remaining $357,000. tom.. \. ._. Developer's Pr In a correspondence from Hillcrest Development, the Council has been asked to adopt a cost-sharin plan that the developer presented at the ori public hearin The plan basicall call for the Hillcrest Development to -pa the full cost of the " directl sewer line which fronts their lots, followin the propo sed street routes. The remainder of all costs would be divided based on the portion of the area served*, of which Hillcrest Development propert is twent per cent (24%) . Usin this methodolo the developer's share becomes $196,500, $26,000 for the c onstruction of wa,termain and $170,500 for the construction of sanitar sewer. The other costs to be financed b the Cit is $393,500. These costs .differ 'substantiall y from those indicated In the developer's proposal as his proposal was based on the over-all front foot assessment shown on the ori feasibilit stud Wi the deletion of the up of Ho Avenue, a substantda. 1 len of low --cost sanitar sewer was . eliminated from the project. This decreased the total project cost but increased the cost per front foot of the sewer to be. installed. We have made the appropriate adjustment in these cost estimates. W Maximum Lot Frontage Alternative Durin the preparation of the feasibilit stud -attempts were made to provide the most usable fronta by followin the proposed street s in the area. Cost estimates concluded that this was not the most' cost-effective wa of installin the s as the developer would have a less-expensive s b installin the trunk sewer followin natural terrain and adding I a. few local laterals -to front the properties. Therefore, this s was not proposed in the feasibilit stud T his s would provide direct fronta as shown on the map below. Usin the concept of assessin full cost on a front foot basis a total developer's cost of $519,700 results,.. . 1 $493,700 for the construction of sanitar sewer, and $26,000 for the water-main construction. Additional Cit costs are $236,800. As can be readil seen, alternative #1 is more cost- effective f-or all parties. However a proposal of alternative #1 has resulted in an ar b the developer that the remote sewer does not directl benefit his development and therefore he should pa onl a-.portion of the construction costs. It . is this over-all cost-effectiveness that was the basis for the staff feelin that cost- sharin in accordance with proportionate* front foot was a feasible arran 0 M LD -ALTERNATIVE FINANCING SU�ZiARY Financin of'Pro-ject Deficits Currentl the Cit relies heavil on assessments to -benefited properties and on direct pa b developers in lieu 'Of assessments to finance public 'improvement projects. For project 78-19, as is the case for man improvement pro these revenues will not cover total pro cost. for a variet of reasons. This ,project involves the replacement of portions of existin s and a substantial benefit to those, f rontin g properties ma not be shown, the project fronts considerable propert in the Cit 'of St. Paul which cannot be assessed., and the project involves the construction of oversized water and sewer facilities to provide a comprehensive s The amount of contribution b the Cit for this oversizin is the maJI-n r Eia s o n for substantial cit co of this pro Currentl bond payments which are not covered b assessment revenue f or the construction of streets, curb and g utter, and storm sewer are aid directl from. tc&xes. Deficits for sanitar sewer are paid b transfers from the sewer fund. Watermain construction deficits. are paid usin funds established b the W.A.C. and the h char These funds are based on the user-char concept. Substantial increases in . the de . bt load carried b these funds will eventual re rate increases or the use of direct. taxes to offset utilit construction, Area Assessments An alternative available to recoup oversizi in costs for the construction of trunkline facilities is to assess on an area basis. This t of assessment is common and has been used in Maplewood to,partiiall finance the Water tower and the Roselawn and Mailand Road Booster Stations, The service area for the trunk sewer is approximat ly 500 acres. A new e public hearin would be re to extend the assessment area. Experience with assessin the waterworks facilit indicates that this t of assessment is ver unpopular as citizens 'do -'not receive an benefit. Assess ment to the service area necessar to'recou p, the additi cost und the developer's proposal 'would be 500-00 per acrie-z., Developer Share Cit Financed Feasibilit Stud Proposal $ 369 $ 221,000 Council Adopted Pro $ 233 $ 357,000 Developer's Proposal $ 196,500 $ 393,000 Maximum Lot Fronta 519 $ 236,800 Financin of'Pro-ject Deficits Currentl the Cit relies heavil on assessments to -benefited properties and on direct pa b developers in lieu 'Of assessments to finance public 'improvement projects. For project 78-19, as is the case for man improvement pro these revenues will not cover total pro cost. for a variet of reasons. This ,project involves the replacement of portions of existin s and a substantial benefit to those, f rontin g properties ma not be shown, the project fronts considerable propert in the Cit 'of St. Paul which cannot be assessed., and the project involves the construction of oversized water and sewer facilities to provide a comprehensive s The amount of contribution b the Cit for this oversizin is the maJI-n r Eia s o n for substantial cit co of this pro Currentl bond payments which are not covered b assessment revenue f or the construction of streets, curb and g utter, and storm sewer are aid directl from. tc&xes. Deficits for sanitar sewer are paid b transfers from the sewer fund. Watermain construction deficits. are paid usin funds established b the W.A.C. and the h char These funds are based on the user-char concept. Substantial increases in . the de . bt load carried b these funds will eventual re rate increases or the use of direct. taxes to offset utilit construction, Area Assessments An alternative available to recoup oversizi in costs for the construction of trunkline facilities is to assess on an area basis. This t of assessment is common and has been used in Maplewood to,partiiall finance the Water tower and the Roselawn and Mailand Road Booster Stations, The service area for the trunk sewer is approximat ly 500 acres. A new e public hearin would be re to extend the assessment area. Experience with assessin the waterworks facilit indicates that this t of assessment is ver unpopular as citizens 'do -'not receive an benefit. Assess ment to the service area necessar to'recou p, the additi cost und the developer's proposal 'would be 500-00 per acrie-z., It would be virtually impossible to define a definite service area for the trunk line waterworks facilities as the project involves the construction of only a small part of trunk facilities to serve a major area of the Cit y. The main criteria that must be shown by the Council in adopting the assessment roll is an increase in the appraised market value of the property. It is very difficult to show a value increase in any particular property due to the construction of remote trunk fac Experience has shown that relatively small assessments, not within the accuracy of a property appraisal, will be sustained . It may be difficult to show a increase in value equal to t-he assessment amount for the larger a g parcels. Precedent established by the Council in the assessment of the waterworks facilities call for the deferment of assessments. to properties that were not directly served by the utility. This practice establishes an asset to the City on record but does not provide.. the revenue to repay the bond obligations for the project. A very obvious inequity that could be created by uniformly assessing the .. entire service area for the trunk facilities provided in the J ro ' ect is P that facilities are not complete improvements to serve the entire area. Most of the area served north of the proposed project will require additional trunk facilities. Assuming area assessments 'would also be used for these facilities, the more far-reaching portions of the service area could be subject to multiple trunk .line assessments. Cash Connection Charges The City Council, in the past, has designated certain properties' to be subject to a cash connection charge for reimbursement to the City of capital investments previously made. The Council could require a cash connection charge when a particular property hooks up to the facilities. This alternative has the sane, shortcoming as the deferrE!d assessment in that it does not provide revenue to make bond payments The establishment of the cash connection charge would not. require . a public hearing. However, it is assumed that, to fairly distribute oversizing costs to the service area, that the already developed parcels would be assessed. The State Statutes also allow for the recouping of trunk line or downstream capital improvements when assessing the local mains. Costs for portions of this project could be assessed with the instal ".ation of future mains. The only advantage to this procedure, above that of establishing a cash connection charge is that the property owners are allowed to pay for the installation over a period of years at City. interest rates To Cit e6uncil City of Maplewood To: Asst. Cit Enained Engr. Serv. Cowd. Public VIon. ell o,recf Utility Fote,-,.c;n Leod Mec.!-Scr.*.,-_ 01her _rt I C, Date HD April 3., 1980 PROJECT FOLDER NO,, INITIALS, The cit has, on March 6,,.1979, sent us a developers a Costs -to be borne b Hillcrest Development are not acceptable to' us, We do not think the -method used b staff to arrive at Hillcrest Development costs are relevant to the trunk line pro as ordered to be installed., nor do -we think that these costs represents the intent of the cit - council as outlined at - the September 6. 1979 .council meetin The staff has advised us that the onl -wa to alter the a Is b council action, This is our reason for comin before y ou this evenin We are in a -with staff on the follovi n Estimated cost i $38090000 Basin served_ is 500 acres, Hillcres Development owns 24% of the 500 acres . lie believe. Hi 1.1crest Developmen't should pay 100% of assessable foot--&% a y-h trunk line falls in our ri of 'wa and 24% of the remainder of the cost. We are referr*in to the trunk sewer line as out-lined in Short Elliots Feasibilit Stud and as ordered 'to be ,installed b the council on September 6. 1979, and as shown on our attached sketch, The M staff has ar'rived at Hillcrest Develop obli -b sa Hillerest w Development owes $152,500 to start with because . I this is the staffs estima of the cost to in ..an alternate s to serve Hillerest Development propert Plus 24% of the remainder of the cost of the trunk I ine . W cannot comprehend wh you would use c based on a s diet Maplewood will not allow to be installed, Will not be installed, Does not no1 and never will exist Hillerest disa ' with the. $152:,500 base fi which does not pertain to the trunk line, Let us arrive at a cost In -the developers'. a based on -costs of the s that is to be installed. Hillorest Development outliLnes* our anal on the attached sketoh,, I have talked to council Anderso in regards to this � matter and I believe he intent of his motion - was in agreement - with -what I have outlined. Thank you $ i -ter. --e- Ernest F. Christiansen vice President Construction Hi l lc re s t Development' • • , .a�•.l+ •- ....•a..4...A.waa.q. r,.�„�r. y.a.,�l. ..1... •''!'•r; L`r' - � , . .._ .. •n -'"'R+ 4S . •♦r' �� „�„ •1 1••, 111 ,•, . .�. �, • �. . • .. V •Mr '• • •� • f� j �. �'•�`� 'wry►•*• •a+l�i ! t . ® . � j ,. f '. r w • • 1 ..I• ,.. r • • 1 \ f •M.. • •'t••�.�' -'. • •.+..� ....�. ��-- ••ii•��Wq •�� !! � i[ 1 t ' ♦ �► 1 • ! 1 f 1 i i .s a ► • •py • • `� f f ' .� • . 1 / !Iw 1 �t d -V .tt �• �, Ilpi•ir a1r / 6 • �'S• �" loop 111114 11Z O • 1 410 U � • •• � ► � t 1 � � � � fit • •• �!► • J /� 4 • �' 1,J \ 3 a • sue• , • � , I •! � • � • 1 t �• 1 `. �/ ", `��' 1 • • � ^ y � �,191A �I I p• • f i � • I• • w, �� U20 ut WI I •• • , • 1.901 ► .� �' . ' "' --? • • • �{+`j 83 76 2. 0 0 I �• • m a r � � • sRw A • • t 1 gg • ' ' • • „ • ' 1 • • • am ► Site v`v" •� I,EL Q, ' ' s • � lb V Y•'� • ��.v • w.A� 1 . � •'t �1 � � �M AA •� • 1. 4 � « • '••0. s n cw jq1,924. 40 two. ti f V 6 OV . ' ~ �`'� '� .,,.� � ..� "'� �,� , r',,� ` �1 i /�` � y l � � , 1 � �! � � � � 11 11 A � ~ i j � � � +aW 0 I/� � (]r� /}. • � . � ,• 111 `. J�:,: ;:! ` ! •� 1 / �� r , / � • •� M1. Y� • �' i.. .. ..i ., , w,.. .••r.•. •Y r \',� • • . 1' ►•. 1 E • • I• I' • • h! 0 4I 0 �— L •. 00 ,0 dF o we sa 5� t '7073.36 1 ••., ,.�•• t•• ►• 1 , Jw rte. '0 6 1 917. � � \r/••'V'• a ! I " ' ,1 �� a ,I v 14 v ~' ♦vr� .� r . 1 • • rr• t �wwYr..r... ............ -,. ,•.+.. • I I ., • • • •. i •+• b. ale f �' ' ..aaaer c� + +r.. } / < r 1 ! • 1 ♦ a•. , .. 1I± . . • u w • • .� ► e - _ " 4 •• w/ p/.y1,,, • ` ' ' ' f ' • • • 1 A.�AB►® _'• Oft y t'i • �� •`m r 1 1� •• i i ' • • r '' .r N w.Itia ..wo 0••+wwO a.•r•r� M-e /r r." M! ' ' "•' Q'40 r M T t 1 1.1 des � N 10 w • , •,/� f , ! ♦ , / • • , • • , ♦ . ,, i • i • ... ... ....+....•.�.+ .w. .. -.q.... ;,, •►.•r► . ..+► +� >r�• 6t�iititY �. J.0it•NSON i? • 71 Ir • • • * ♦ss.� . 1 i •o, will »n♦ s tuff 1 Li Ns no v� ell , -All es 0 I SL J ,, J '• / + '' Jt • i1.1►5 .a . • • ,�, ►. �, ,� • .. ► ,p . . . •••►1 V ,..KS'n.r 14'•w'�[' J•�' L" .7 .....•�•..�,..i•••S ......� - ." » � " I T � .._ 7• Y f [ 1 �••+.. w «. y,,,,,. •.� • •. , M E M 0 R A N, D U M TO, Ma and Cit Council FROM: Actin Cit Mana SUBJECT: Assessment Rates DATE: September 7, 1978 The staff has previousl indicated that the Counci ma wish to revi current assessment rates in lieu of the substantial debt service -beIn . ... ....... 7 0--n-d . ..... ............ ... .. �,urrent T) Iic calls f or the Cit C u r r e d t o J!'Zi.-I -tax to pa of sanitar sewer extension. A-.so ' Ch"ke' fixed rates of $13.50 per front foot for the water main and the 2 1/2 and 5 cent per s f oot for storm sewer assessment have not kept up with the increa. i S 1 D!L_Q_0S._ t of public improvements. The public imp_rove-ment hearin scheduled-f-Qr September 14 is the first of a number of pro which will be presented to the council in the near U _, U ................ _ aTe ii:!'[Itici ated to lie constrUCLed -d 1979 ur in cy I an rate ad should be in effect for the hearin SANITARY SM4ER Under the current assessment Policy for sanitar sewers the Cit plays 20% of the cost of the mains g eneral - ga on from e obliti - --- ------ — -1. - 5 - an cr appor 10 the--r-p-mal-nin 80% of the cost. a-moun the �ssessable:. f -1--ont, feet Within the project. Service c.onne'ctions are assessed at 100% of actual cost. The assessable front foot acye within the project is deter-. mined on an individual parcel basis, ulid-block lots are assessed the actual fronta Corner lots are assessed . on the short side..' and in the case of those corner lots havin sanitar sewer on two sides,. the assessable front feet are the surn, -of the lon side and the short side* less 140 ft. f No credit is g iven fo the cost of mains over minimum. sizin The Cit except on ver rare occasions, builds sanitar mains in three sizes onl Namel 8-inch, 10-inch, and 12-inch. The cost of la these pipe sizes is approximatel the same, with principal difference bein onl that of the cost of the pipe. Pipe sizin amounts to about a seven percent spread in the cost of entire main construction. The.;-e- fore, it does not appear necessar to consider an assessment structwre wbich w incorporate an adjustment for oversi i izin • Under the 80% -assessment polic the City, has placed approximatel S551,500. of sanitary sewer cost a the*p-e,neral ob-, Li for projects asse.ssed In calander y ears 1976, 1977, and -J - M The assessment rates of the projects varied a low of $4.11 per f ro n Sanitar Sewer, Cont 0 Also certain inequities exist in the present are re Y a cost. as*soci ated witil inter However, if the developer can cause the Cit to do with his tract,, his Costs are 'aUtOnIaTt:I.C-a-ll Y uce ' construct a n. - assesses e c sewer impro f0, n t T)ro ects cons 1T-C:7- can.d been initiated by---devel Pa 2 nay plat impr ovements. an work associated 1--b 20/'0. Generall T - 113 � M e� 'Mt y n ave The staff feels it is desirable to red-ace the burden to the Reneral tax roll and a7 Tl�-oc`atc�-­Tmprove­m cost to tho- se properties benefitted, it F, t ical sanitar sewer extension -pro be inc IZ- FLY2 S. ---- IJ A T V P V A T AT C- Water main assessment is based on a fixed rate per front foot applied to the ben.e properties in a manner similar to saT1 itar sewer assessment. The rate is anticipated to pa for the avera cost of a residential size water main installation (8-inch). The cost f or oversizin mains needed for distribution purposes is paid from the g eneral fund, W.A.C. fund or fire protection char The exist-'A-n $13- per front foot rate does not reflect current construction costs, And a rate chan is'in order. In pro assess- ed in calander years 1976, 1977, and 1978 the Cit has financed $1,,.071,500 of water main installation with W.A.C. - char fire protects char and the g eneral fund. The staff has investi the . current cost of constructii-) an 8-inch water 'main. Tht.e estimated avera cost is I 139-50 per foot. This f i includes city overhead and capitalized int eras t, however, does not ad for unusable front foo street right-of•wa etc.. The staf f f eels that a rate adjustment to $20. 00 per j f ront foot is in order. The last rate chan was made in 1975. It is felt that In the - future that rate adjustments should be made on a more fre basis to reduce the P ro j ect deficits and avoid the substantial increases we now face. STORM SEWER The current storm sewer assessments are calculated as a fixed rate of 2 1/2 cents per s foot for low densit r esidential properties and 5 cents per s foor for medium and hi densit residential, commer vial and industrial properties. The -ph - b ehind the rate schedule was to have low ' densit residential properties pa for 50% of the actual • cost of the project, j ect, and other. properties pa a 100% cost recover rate. • The existin rates are not ade to recoup project cost in accordance with the assessment theor Thus an increasin burden is placed on the g eneral tax fund. For projects assessed calendar y ears' 19761 1977 and 1.978 the*Cit placed approximatel $1,011,000 of storm sewer construction cost a g eneral obli Project cost vs. propert benefit is difficult to evaluate as each pro in uni and draina pro are not comparable in terms .of level of service provided. However a cost base is necessar in order to establish an assessment rate. Staff has examined the seven storm sewer pro assessed in the last three y ears. The rate of assessment re-. q uired to 'obtain the 50% and 100% cost recover was established. The res indicated that the avera cost .of the projects was between 8 and ' 9 cents per s foot. Usin th fi as an assessment rate base ig conservative as it is formulated from costs of completed pro Staff feels that an assessment rate of 4 1/2 cents per s foot for low densit residential and 9 cents per s foot for commercial properties is 31-n. order. STREET .IMPROVEMENT S Street improvements are currentl assessed at a rate of 100% of project cost w1hen applicable. In cases where the improvement serves other .than land access functions, state aid and g eneral fund monies are used. Fundin decision are based on individual pro re No chan in existin assessment procedures appear warranted. RECO1v2-1ENDATION It is recommended that the Council Rates indicated below. It should be uni b the Council on an individual project Rates-.3is to provide a. polic to situation establish the Standard Assessment Jerstood that rates are established basis. The purpose of the Standard be followed in t -asses I smen t Street Improvement 100% of Project Cost Sewer Main Extensions 100% of Project Cost. Water Main Extension Fixed Rate $20 per .front foot Storm Sewer Improvements Fixed Rate 4 1/2 cents per s foot for low densit residential. 9 cents per s foot others, .0.0 0 MEMORANDWI TO: Cit Mana FROM" Assistant Cit En SUBJECT: Hillcrest.Development - Pr 78-19 - Public Hearin DATE: Au 24, 1979 The feasibilit -stud for this project was presented to the Cit Counci 1 on Au 2., 1979. At that time, the developer raised a question concernin his share of the sanitar sewer cost, The feasibilit -stud presented a financin breakdown based on the method used for other recent developer projects. This method is predicated on the assumption that the developer should bear the proportionate share of all improvements t1irou or abuting . his property. -In practice this method, applied to sanitar sewer, works as follows: The benefitted front foota of private propert is determined. - The len g th of pipe throu the developer's propert is determined and multiplied b t-,vjo (2) (because utilities traditionall aria assessed to both sides), - The private propert and developer's foota are added to and divided into the total s sewer cost to determine an estimated front foota char - The developer's share is determined from multipl the from-_- foota char b his foota arrived at earlier. - Usin this method, the developer's share is $323,.000 for sani,L-ar sewer, The developer feels this arran places an undue burden on him for two' (2) reasons: 1 The proposed sanitar sewer does not provide direct lateral service alon its entire len to his preliminar development- proposal, 2. The sewer is intended to serve axe area lar than his propert which re a sli laro-er and deeper pipe The staff has investi alternative financin methods and presents one of the methods here for comparison. The proposed trunk sewer throu the Hillcrest propert does provide some direct lateral service. The estimated cost of providin this service usin a s designed . o n l y to serve Hillcrest Development is $152,500. This fi represents the minimum investment the developer must make to provide direct lateral . service e to that provided b the proposed trunk sewer. The estimated cost of the proposed. trunk -sewer is $380,000 The. dif f erence of $,227,500 could be considered the extra co of constructin the trunk sewer, Pa 2 TTie proposed trunk sewer is intended to serve an area of approximatel 500 g ross acres. Hillcrest Development represents 120 acres, or 24% of the entl`k-e, s-ervice area. Since Hillcrest represents 24% of the trunk service area, the should bear 24% of the extra cost for constructin the proposed trunk sewer. This amounts to $54,500. .To arrive at the developer's total share of the cost, the char for the 8" sewer on Ho Avenue must be added to the $152,500 and the $54,500 alread determined. The sewer alon Ho is char at the estimated rate of $29.71 per front foot. Hillcrest's fronta is 1150 feet which yields'$34,000. The total developer's stare is then $241,000. This represents s-a reduction in the developer's share of $82,000 from the fi presented in the feasibilit stud The $82,000 becomes a cost to be borne b the Cit The Cit share of the cost for this pro as presented in the feasibilit stud is $1-82,000. If the alternative financin method is used, the . City share becomeS $264,000. Another aspect of the financin of concern to the Cit is the portion of the pro cost to be recovered throu assessments. An.-opini,on' from the Cit Attorne -office re the proposed assessments will be available for the public hearin An information session is scheduled for the purpose of answerin . from affected propert owners, If the Council chooses to order the improvements, it is recoirmended it be contin on the .,developer pa for his portion of the project. The proposed improvements are in a with the Compreherisive Plan. Since. the Plannin Commission has not had an opportun-t.t to review the improvements the Council must make a findin that the pro conforms to the plan before orderin the improvements, Action by Counal Endorsed-- Modif i e d.- Rejected Date TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 3 ani Sewer, Ratermain Storm Sewer lo Ave. Street Construction '3terlin Street Construction TOTALS ASSESSMENT. SUMMARY ASSESSMENT RATE ASSESSABLE- DEVELOPER CITY -TOTAL COSTS.' SHARE SHARE COSTS $29.71/L.Fw $117.-000 $323,000 440, 0.0l_ 20,00/L.F. 153, 360 31,960 10 680 290 009/S.Fo 72,270 77,730 .150 001- 67.82/L.F. 232 108, 000 340,00k'7. 17 . 60/L.F . 4 f 700 $579,330 4 7 $462,960 $182,410 $ 1', 224 7th _. ��, V) LIIIF�NEY AVE. L ------- a V) _j RIP"LEY L) AV HOLLOWAY AV rE 6 X z < z LLJ LLJ _j L AR �PE NTE U R �P AVE 12@1 12 ► C0 PROPOSED PONT) i IDAHO AVE. CIJ CD LJ c t-- 11 lio-1111 1. HOYT AV J,S-T H. NO. 212 < cr z 0 2 50' - 54DO 12 1 : AI • C\; I I 1 0 1 1001or m Ir I Aeff 0 Ar MARYLAKE RD. Ar -Ar Ar Ar A� Iff LEGEND C5 I N PLA C E WATERMAIN NN Em on PROPOSED WATERIVAIN BY -CITY Lkj Lij SEN PROPOSED WATERt*11AIN; BY DEVELOPER --i m Q, 2 ';Zz < NOKOMIS 4- - FUTURE PROPOSED WATERMAIN V-: ............... --- e� APPROVED DATE. 8/2/79 is z 0 F- Q) U) < E. MARYLAND AVE. _j < MARYLAND AVE. Q z � z z 0 GER ANIUM 0 Li w 87 BEA vf iy < G E F? A N I A � V - E L A KE PREPARED BY SHORT ELLIC)TT HENDRICKSON, INC. ST.. PAUL. MINNESOTA 0 CHIPPEWA FAL WISC EXIISTING AND RECOMME LADED WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION FILE N O. 78107 DRAWING NO. j ►-- H A'd E . . I T IE r �'1 E Y A vE . a -_j i � 0 cc w F- 0 RIF�_EY " AVE. I Ir '� ca 0 cr T - w L AR PENTE UP, AVE. w a z w U cr 11 r W i 1 DRAINAGE AREA IDAHO AVE. FUTURE PONDING _a STORM SEW ER H 0 Y T AV � ---- -- zz- 0 _ 1 RY ALTERNATE. OPEN CHANNEL ROUT E 4 SEN NUKUMIS INPLACE CULVERTS MAR YLAKE RD. S.T H N CB. 21 c r c Zoo' soo' 0 U z o U � Q) �C Q Q wla AP PROVED FILE NO. PREPARED BY 7.3107 . SHORT ELLIOTT H ENDRICKSON. INC PROPOSED PONDING AREAS Ur�T E AND STORM SEWER S D RAWING NO. 8/2 ST PAUL MINNFS07A 0 Cr-tIPPEWA FALLS Wi SC ,q 0 0 w < AiA LE GEND p U �G PROPOSED PONDING AREAS AND S IN ACRE -FEET Lij �-- W U) ° z � C) PROPOSED STORM SEWER (BY DEVELOPER) Ir u AND CAPACITY IN C.F. 0 0 S.T H N CB. 21 c r c Zoo' soo' 0 U z o U � Q) �C Q Q wla AP PROVED FILE NO. PREPARED BY 7.3107 . SHORT ELLIOTT H ENDRICKSON. INC PROPOSED PONDING AREAS Ur�T E AND STORM SEWER S D RAWING NO. 8/2 ST PAUL MINNFS07A 0 Cr-tIPPEWA FALLS Wi SC ,q E MARYLAND AVE. w < AiA PROPOSED STORM SEWER AVE. (BY CITY) AND ° z � C) CAPACITY CAPACITY I N C.F: S. Ir u 0 0 0 GE a w BEA vi w < f qty! L A AE AVE. S.T H N CB. 21 c r c Zoo' soo' 0 U z o U � Q) �C Q Q wla AP PROVED FILE NO. PREPARED BY 7.3107 . SHORT ELLIOTT H ENDRICKSON. INC PROPOSED PONDING AREAS Ur�T E AND STORM SEWER S D RAWING NO. 8/2 ST PAUL MINNFS07A 0 Cr-tIPPEWA FALLS Wi SC ,q MEMORANDUM to; C1 ty Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Final Plat LOCATION: Maryland Avenue, West of Fern&l e Street APPLICANT: Brandt Engineering Company PROJECT: Maple Greens Third Addition DATE: April 10., 1980 The applicant is requesting approval of a final plat for the Maple Greens Third Addition. The City Council approved the preliminary plat on July 20, 1978, subject. to the following conditions: 1. Approval of than design and construction phasing of the proposed storm wa ponds L, and drainage system for the Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Additions by -he City Lngineer, before final plat approval; 2. The final plat shall not be approved, unless the City Council orders the construction of Sterling Street; 3. If the Council orders Sterling Street to Maryland Avenue, Outlot C shall be shown as a dedicated public right --of -way. If Sterling Street is terminated at East Rose Avenue, Outlot C shall be omitted and the property combined with Lots 31 and 32 of Block 1, Maple Greens Third Addition; 4. Outlot B shall be redesigned to include only the west 20 feet. The remai nder of the property/ shal 1 be incorporated into block 6, lots 6 and 7; 5. The portion of Outlot D from the northwest corner of lot 15, block 1 westerly to Outlot C shall be incorporated into lots to the south; 6. All outlots shall be dedicated to the -City 7. Approval of written documentation, such as by-laws, and articles of i ncorpor -- ati on, for the homeowner's association before final plat approval . Such document-- ation shall clearly define responsibilities for property and utility maintenance, . y .utility billings and assessments. Such documentation shall be recorded so as to run with each affected property. Should the Association be dissolved, it's assets shall be dedicated to an appropriate public agency to be used for purposes si mi l dir to those for which this Association was created. If dedication is refused, the assets are to be transferred to some other non- rofit organization p 9 to be devoted to such similar purposes. 8. Approval of easements for drive access and u t i l i t i e s to each lot. Such ease- ments. shall be recorded to run with the land,* 9. Obtaining a permit from the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed Board. 10. Overall densities shall not exceed those allowed b y Comprehensive the Plan. 11. Owner and applicant agree to the above i n wri ti n . 9 Council approved a final plat on June 7, 1979 for 8 larger area than is presently requested. The applicant would like to phase the previously approved plat in two parts. The plat is enC7oSed. Recommenda tion Approval of the final plat, subject to the following conditions: 7. Developer must enter into a developer agreement with the City, to be approved by the Director Of Public Works. - 2, Satisfactory arrangements must be made to complete construction and pay outstanding bills on Maple Greens I and II. . 3. Approval Of the final plat shall not take affect until the above conditions are met. This means that the preliminary plat approval must be.renewed in 90 days if these conditions are not met. I disagree with t'he above recommendation. I would recommend that the matter he tabled until Item 2 above is C � lete. ' n ./Evuns \� A o" on by OonnoiI� End or o�_______� D�±o . ' ' - - ` -----'� --~----- ---- -------- '----- ' - -- - - ' - ' -~ ~ U a i; s �ti i b MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Zoning Code Amendments; Accessory Building Setbacks DATE: February 28, 1980 1M Req Staff is requesting that the Zoning Code be amended to provide for a uniform minimum setback for accessory bui l di ngs . Staff also requests a Code Amendment to allow the expansion of non - conforming accessory buildings under specified circumstances. Summary of Existing Code Sections 904.060 (Res Dwelling) and 905.060 (Residential-Double Dwelling) state that accessory buildings are subject to a five foot setback req!Jirement for side and rear yards, except as follows: a. Rear Yard - "not less than four feet where alleys are plotted". b. Side Yard - "Where a garage i Located in the rear of a lot, not 1 ess than twenty feet (20 ft..) behind the dwel such garage may be built so that no portion thereof is less than one foot (1 ft.) from the side lot line Reasons for Change 1. Boundary disputes are encouraged when garages are allowed to be built within one foot of a lot line. Since the City does not require surveys for building permit , the Building Inspectors may not be able to visually determine if a structure• is on the Applicant's lot. This is particularly a problem with a one foot setback. Increasi the setback to five feet would reduce the chance of boundary di sputes . 2. Friction between neighbors may develop, due to stormwater running off a .garage roof onto adjacent property. Increasing the setback would help to minimize the potential for such disputes. 3. The Bui 1 di ng Code requi res a one-hour. f re wal 1 and no veal 1 openi ngs , when structure is less than 3 feet from a property line or within 6 feet of anoV - ter structure. Assuming that •a 5 foot setback were to be adopted, the maximum allowable overhang could be accommodated and still provide a. 3 foot separation between building and lot line, eliminating the need and added expense of a fire wall. 4. There is no reason for allowing a garage to be bui lt up to four feet closer to a l l i n e thaYi another accessory bui 1 di ng on the same lot. The converse woul be more appropriate from a public safety perspective. r e ► 5. Public Works. requests that driveways maintain a 5 foot setback to provide an adequate turning radius onto the property and to provide adequate area for snow storage. 6. A survey of several other communities revealed the predominant setback for side and rear yards to be at least 5 feet for accessory buildings. (See enclosed survey.) 7. Sections 904.060 and. 905.060 allow a garage to be built with a side yard. setback .of one- -foot, provided the structure is to be located at least 20 feet behind a dwel 1 i ng . If at a later date, however, the homeowner desires to expand the home or garage into the required 20 foot separation, a variance must be approved. Rather than approving each variance request of this type, as has been done in the past, Staff recoff that the 20 foot separation requirement be eliminated and replaced with reference to the p r o v i s i o n s of the Building Code. The Code does not establ i sr) minimum allowable separation distances. Rather, it requires the incorporation of more restrictive construction standards when placing a structure closer than 3 feet from a lot line or within 6 feet of another structure on the same lot. 8. Adoption of a uniform 5 foot setback amendment would cause garages with less than a five foot setback to be considered as non - conforming . The Planning 'Commission has i'n the past voiced a concern that status as a non - conformi nee structure would create a problem for those persons wishing to enlarge garages which were legal and conforming prior to amendment of the ordinance. Staff has considered this concern and proposes that Section 912.010 of City Code (Non-Conforming Uses) be amended to provide for expansion of non - conformi nq accessory structures under sueci f i ed circumstances (refer to oaae 4.) . Past Actio The Board of Adjustments and Appeals has, in the past, approved variances to the 20 foot separation provision of Sections 904.060 and 905.060. The most recent examples are: - October 13, 1977: Darlene Karow, 1 896 Barclay Street - an addition to her home, reducing the required 20 foot separation to 8 feet. -July . 23, 1977: Cary Bumbach, 2256 Craig Place - an addition to his home, reducing the required separation to 8 feet. On September 19, 1977 Staff recommended adoption of a uniform 5 foot setback and elimination of the 20 foot separation provision of Sections 904.060 and 905.060. The Planning Commission tabled this request for further study, s i ti rig : (1) garages wi t a setback of less than 5 feet should not be consi dered . as non - conforming for purposes of remodeling i f .built prior to ordinance amendment , (2) a survey of surrounding communities was desired, and (3) more justification needed (See enclosed minutes) . Recommendation I Sections 904.050, 9! 4.060 .and 905.060 are proposed to be amended and Sections. 9041.100 and 905.060 to be added as follows (add;, :tions are underlined and deletions are lined out) : 9 r 904. *050. SIDE YARD REQUIREMENTS. RE.MENTS . Each lo s hall . • t 1 have two side do yards , one an each side of the bui l.d i na. For every building erected or structural ly al toyed, each side yard shall have a width of not less than five feet 5 ft. -. • ( ) � Side yard " shat- T -Riean- the-di stanee- frem -- the- s4do- Iet- 44 me- te -- the- near -- ' est pertien - ef - the bu4l : -- . The._..foreg& . gig..- reEl:uirement-- fer -s4de- ands- shal4- ' lowing modifications:' -� be sub,�ect to the fol- 1. On a corner lot, the side yard on the street side of such corner lot shall have a width of not less than thirty feet (30 ft.) } 2. A church, public, parochial, or private school shall have ' ve a side yard of not l ess than fifty feet (50 ft.) on each side adjoining ni n other J 0 property. 3. When two or more adjoining ni n lots are u - � • . g used as a single Hell e bu � 1 d � nq s ite to tne si de yard requirements shall apply only to the outside l li nes. 904.060 and 905.060 REAR YARD REQUIREMENTS 1. The rear ,card for each lot shall have a depth u ti .� o p equal to , or greater t��an , twenty percent (20 %) of . the depth of the lot. 2. The setback for dwelling accessory -.. g ssory buildings di ngs shall be not less than five feet ( 5 ft.) from the rear lot l i n e where- He- - a��ey5 -are p4e�ted- and - Ret -4 ess - than - feur - - feet- �4 -ft-4- where-- a4 ;eys -are- ;etted p . there a garage- 4s- 4eEated -fin- the -y , r -of-- the -� ®t, -n ®t -less- than- twen.,�y feet��2 ® -f�: � behind- the -d�e�l -gin ;- suEh -�araa - • ert� ®n -th�r -4s-less - _� g � ,e may. - be- built -se- that -�e p eef 4s less Shan - ene- f eet- �l -ft: �- frepi- the-- s4de -•; - • except that on a corner lot, - (30 et }ne' street a th i rty foot ft. } setback from the side shall be the minimum. 90 and 9 BUI LDING SEPARAT REQUIREMENT. Separation on between an accessory cessory structure and a ri nci e structure or another accessory structure shall be in con- formance with Building Code requirements. The proposed Amendments are based upon the following findings: l . There - i s no purpose for e s t a b l i s h i n g less res tili cti ve s e tbacr re qua rements for garages than of lier accessory bui l di nrs . 2. Boundary disputes are encouraged when garages are allowed to be built within n one foot of property lines. 3. Homeowners are unjustifiably required to maintain a 20. foot se arati on between n garage and home when their garage is less than 5 feet from a* side lot line, 4. The BUi 1 di ng code allows an accessory .bu i 1 di n to be built as clo _ 9 se as 6 feet from a pri nci p ] e structure on the same l ot, wi thout provision of frost footings or - fire protection measures. 5. El imi nation. of the 20 foot separation provision 1.1i l 1 r equest s s .. ' p reduce v re�uest� 60 Among adjoining corm muni ti es , the redomi neat s p s ide a nd rear yard .setback far , acces sory b u i l d i n g s is at least 5 feet. 3 ` . II. Amend Section 812.010 by adding 8 subsection /8\ to address eXp8DSion of non- conforming accessory buildings. The proposed addition is as follows: 912.010/8\ EXPANSION OF ACCESSORY BUILDINGS. An accessory building which 1S caused to be non-conforming, due t0 an ame to the Zoning Code, may be expanded if the following conditions are met: a. The building i3 zoned properly b. The building was a COnforming structure prior to the effective date Uf. 0rdinancs /Amendment to Accessory Building Setback Requirements) ' C. All presently applicable Building Code requirements are met ' d. All portions of_Said structure are on the Applicant's property e. Runoff from the OYerhana of Said structure 1S not adversely affecting an adjacent property f. Any proposed building addition Shall be mcade away from Side and rear lot .lines This Amendment proposal is based upon the follOwjn g findings: ]. Adoption of uniform 5 foot setback would ]imit exi garages, closer than the required 5 feet frOm. expansion ' 2. Similar logic is presented in 3ection of City Code. In essence" Section 912.100 states that if the City acts to acquire additional right-of-way and sub- sequently reduces a previously legal and conforming prope.rt« to a Sub- Standard setback or area, that Use Shall continue as if reductions had not occurred 3, The above criteria would allow expansion Of non-conforming garages in a manner Consistent with the proposed setback reqUirem�nt3, thereh«, mjnimizing potential public safet and plannin concerns, I�uIo�ood__ ' �r�eo�e"d . 4 , 1. Rear yard setbacks: 30' 2. Side .yard setbacks: 10.' 3. Minimum separation: None .. , J • 1. Rear yard setback: 5' 2. Side yard setback: 5' 3. Minimum separation: 6' 1. Rear yard setback: Rl --40' , R2 & R3 30' 2. Side yard setback: 10' 3. Minimum separation: None r'1 • '7 '7 1. Rear yard setback: 2. Side yard setback: 3. Minimum separation: White Bear Lake 1. Rear yard setback: 2. Side yard setback: 3. Minimum Separation: 5 5' None (firewall*required within 6') 8' 5' 6' K_ Attachment A } y' Survey -- February 1980 ACCESSORY BUILDING SETBACKS The following questions were asked of each City surveyed: 1. What is the required minimum rear yard setback for accessory buildings? 2. What is the required minimum side yard setback for accessory buildings? 3. What is the minimum separation requirement between the principal building and detached accessory buildings? The following numbered answers for each City correspond to the, above numbered question Columbia Heights 1. Rear yard setbacks: 20' if door is facing ..al 1 ey, 3' if not 2. Side yard setbacks: 2' 3. Minimum separation: 6' (frost footings and a fire wall required 6 feet) . Coon Rapids 1. Rear yard setback.: R1 (100' X 150' lots) 50', R2 (80 X 135 lot) 35" 2. Side yard setback:.: RI-10' , interior lot, 20' corner lot; R2_5'. interior lot,, 20' core . 3. Minimum separation: 10' lot Little Canada 1. Rear yard setbacks: 30' 2. Side .yard setbacks: 10.' 3. Minimum separation: None .. , J • 1. Rear yard setback: 5' 2. Side yard setback: 5' 3. Minimum separation: 6' 1. Rear yard setback: Rl --40' , R2 & R3 30' 2. Side yard setback: 10' 3. Minimum separation: None r'1 • '7 '7 1. Rear yard setback: 2. Side yard setback: 3. Minimum separation: White Bear Lake 1. Rear yard setback: 2. Side yard setback: 3. Minimum Separation: 5 5' None (firewall*required within 6') 8' 5' 6' K_ a 5 Woodbury 1 . Rear yard s etbac k 2. Side yard setback: 3. Minimum separation: to be c l a s s i f i e d as requirements for an garage-35', shed -10' 5' interior lot, 10' corner lot None (structure must be C' or more from principle building detached, if closer, the structure must meet building code attached structure). ATTACHMENT B PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 1977 El Amendment to Zonin Ordinance (904.060 (3) and 905.060 (3) TI-IN Secretar Olson said staff is re an am.endmen t to the Code x-,,Thich would state g ara g es iiia not be constru'.-ted an closer than 0" feet to the, house witlfiout co frost footin This revision vTo re all 11C-W g arc g es constructed to be'five feet from the side pa -opert line, Commissioner Fischer said there would be a problem with the existin g ara g es one foot from the propert line t).-tat owners wish to enlar The g ara g es would be considered nonconformin to 0-1.e new ordinance, Secretar Olson said there would be the opportunit of g ranting a variance for the non-conformini structures. Coimmissioner Ear nett said the Conmiissi*.-on should further investi to see how the proposed chan would affect the 1)on-conforinin section of the Code, Commissioner ")'herburne said lie thou the amendment was probabl in order but 3. t -will re more discussion and consideration, recommended the I Commissio table A Item 8 E until after Item 11 "Comprehensive Plan • Amendment" to determine what informati-on the Commission will need to make a solid recommendation for an ordinance chan sioner e Barrct"t seconded Ay s xi 3 7 :,...•. • .t...p". m.:..r,+ .FY.• .u^s°!C'e ,..ae^v't, +: .v*'.i' "!: ro;::fNtsac".pa+•''.,Y'ttiY°1P P' rcw, r. ;X - J + ;4'.• ,. '.•�' r-vr, n, n -!A 14; t A 4;1 Clit•irmt-in Axdalil asked how the Cit could regUlc-lte the size, hei and land covera of buildin in a proposal that would fall under the amendment, Secretar Olson s, -ii e- d there could b cr . Iteria included which would define the type of units perm-itted in the district, Commissioner Prew said the definition, as it exists in the Comprehensive Plan, I's definitel for construction of sin famil detached developments with an interspersin of duplexes in the RL District. Rather than jeopardize the intent of the definition to accommodate several specific locations in the Cit he would su the possibilit of addin a new land use desi to the Comprehensive Plan (RL XX to appl to these 'certain areas. He does not a with chan the definition to permit bi buildin in the RL "area. Commissioner Pellish said he concurs with Commissioner Prew. Ile thou a new land use desi could be establ__shed which could be applied to the certain areas that are considered uni Secretar Olson said staff could- draft a new land -use district if there is a concensus of the Conunission it would be acceptable, Commissioner Howard sug staff check with other cities to see If 0 1 the have used the proposed and how succes.t3ful it was. Commi-&-ssioner Barrett said the Coffimission had previousl prepared a document with land use cate and zonifi cate and what .uses would be permitted under each district. Secretar Olson said he would f 'Ind the document and brin It back for ..Couffiiission review, Commissioner Howard moved this item be. tabled pendin additional information from staff, Commissioner Pellish seconded A all, E. Amendment to Zonin Ordinance (904.060 (3) and 905-060 (3) (Continued) Commissioner Sherburne asked if staff had reviewed the proposed Code chan& with the Fire Marshal. Secretar Olson said y es, he found it E.cceptable. The five feet would g ive a better fire protection. Commissioner Barrett moved the Commission table this item for further stud as to how the proposed chan would relate- to other e ordinances and what other ordinances, would have Lo be chan Colfunissioner Sherburne seconded A all, .9 1 4. D--BUSIN1 SS .8 jS11".'NTAT'T 10 01 C11911TSSION P R -ON � �_`"`w- �---_. .All -��i Tii �mi� Lake Commissioner 11owarAd-,gav-e summar of the action of the Ut ---Be,,a- cit -ed cliciii-ica"L, 1 ),I.ant* north of 1-694, i r the �propos --i n d es t t - _ Z.. r in '1 liwa 61*, NOTICE OF PUBLIC 11EARIN6 FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING CODE Notice is hereby given that the Maplewood City Council at their meeting of Thursday, April 17, 7980 at 7:45 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Maplewood Municipal Building, 7380 Frost Avenue" will consider and receive all public remarks regarding an amendment to the Zoning Code to provide for a uniform minimum setba.ck for accessory- buildings and an amendment to a17ow the expansion of non-conforming accessory buildings under specified circumstances. Additional information on these proposed amendments are on file in the Office of Community Developmen.t. 102 East County Road B. 77O-456O ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER ARE INVITED TO ATTEND AND BE HEARD *uo � r r ti d. Construction of the storm water project shown in the Maplewood Drainage Plan for Radatz Avenue. Al necessary easei,ients shall also be dedicated to the City. This project includes pi pi ng, ponding, and control devices. Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes - . al 1 . 9. OLD BUSINE A. Code Amendment -- Accessory Building Setbacks Secretary Olson said the Commission had previously reviewed this Code Amendment and returned it back to staff for further information. Staff is recommends ng amending the Code to have a uniform setback for accessory buildings. The amendment will be eliminating the special condition where a garage is located 20 feet or more behind the house, it may be within one foot of the side property line. Coriii ssi oner Prew moved the .Planning Comi1ii s si on recommend to the Ci Council as royal of t Code amendment as out-1 i ned in Staff's report dated February 28, 1980 Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes •- all. B. P Update. The Commission reviewed the Update and the Housing Plan. 10. CONv I SS I ON PRESENTATIONS 11. STAFF PRESEN TATIONS 12. ADJOURNMENT Meeti adjourned at 10:30 P.M. 4 3-17-80. 1 �+ It I ^ I 1 . -� ~ . . MEMORANDUM TO : City Council FROM : Barry R. Evans, City Manag SUBJECT: Travel and Training ` DATE April 25 1880 \ ~� - - Based on Councilman Anderson's concern over Travel and Training I have had the attached, survey Of surrounding communities made. I will not go into the results of that Survey as I am certain you can make your own judgements on the matter. ' I would however, recommend that should changes Travel and.' Training policy be made" that they not go into effect until 1981. Changing course in the middle Of the year wou d not be equitable since some employees have Operated under the existing policy and a change .might penalize those who have not yet sought approval to attend their conference. A otIoo b Y Oo�����x. �^Jec�e S U R V E Y I) N"I CITH., EUENSE APHL, 1-980 'VRAVE1, AND TRAI. 1XI City o J. n t o n L '-I C Travol and Tralh-lilip, Polic BJ-,00MTN(-'rTON. No re g o to Council except f or annual Bill Franc- bud approval. De-partinenL heads jLlStif e-K.penditures. in bltd re Generall Personnel Dir. -1 - tTonal conferences department heads attend nZI i 881-5811 . 4 annuall There --s an zac-knowled need for professional development and the Cit has no restrictive policies, EDINA Mark Bernardson Admin. Asst. 927-8861 ST. LOUTS PARK Sue Richards Personnel Dir. 920-300.9 No re g o to Council except for annual bud approval. CO'uncil does, examine this line item in detail.. Cit 'Mana approves all trips for re and national conferences. Department heads normall attend national cQnference ever other y ear. Local travel and trainin approved b department h,ea&;. No re g o to Council except for annual bud approval. Each major conference or trainin course is a separate line item. Cit 'Mana approves re for travel and trainin . Non-pro -pr apmiiedl trainin and travel ma be approved b 'Cit if funds are' available and j ustified, R I C 1i 7e I Er.,D Until the recent chan in C. M.., amemo teas Jo Wold submitted to Council whenever a trip outside Dir. Ad-iin. Svcs. local area x,7as anti'cipated. Council. did 869-7521 fre exercise veto rower. Now the Bob Doddery r m, is providino- Council with a six-m.onth Police S projection of expected travel and trainin DeDartment heads attend their nat. i.bnal conference ever other year. In the off- a subordinate w ill Drol-ably g o to their professional or ization's conference �-111i ,ETONTKA Jud Appel Pers. Tech. 933-2511 Does not re Council aj-)Proval, except for bud approval. Department heads authorized to attend one n coyi-Ference Por year. Cit - i c , t T r av e I a n d T -r,-1 -1 01 ic P o I n t o 11 -to Lo COLInCil except f o t r he No re 1:3 annual bud -1p Departilio_nL heads Jim Hill identif their need:; in bud ,c� stibmissions ACM/ P.S. Dir. and Ci t Mana dc--_,fends, annual bud 571-3450 submitted to Council. Departn . iont heads obtain Cit Mana concurrence prior.to sendin personnel to schools or conferences- 2. CRYSTAL Re for travel and trainin funds are justified to Cit Mana C.M. presents .a Miles Johnson lump- I sum line item re to Council in annual Finance Director bud After bud is approved, no further 537-8421 action re b Council unless an unusual hi cost or len of school is involved (i.e., 3-month FBI school). Department heads attend national conference ever other y ear. C.M. attends ever y ear, 3. BLAINE No re g o to Council except for annual. bud approval. Justifications are prepared Jo Twistol in bud process. Lump --sum line item Pers. Dir.. identified as 'emplo development 1.1-lost 784-6700 state associati - on conferences and selected out-of-state conferences are attended ever y ear. Cit Manager approves re for attendcance but mostl a formalit !, & P MUTH 4 LY� Frank Bo Admin. Assist. 559-2800 .Dick Carl Police Chief No re g o to Council except for annual bud approval, Formal trainin and conferences are programmed at bud time. City is selective in that must ha direct-application to job. Department heads limited to no more than one major conference per year.. Actually, the go 4 less fre 5. WHITE BEAR LAKE No re g o to Council except for annual bud approval. General polic is.to limit Mar Ea to in-state conferences to keep costs down. -Asst. Fin. Dir-, Department he,--ids approvere for travel 429-.5367 and trainin Mana si all checks though, City (P o i n. t of Contcact) Travel and T-r,-i i nincf, P 011 6. G0LDI7,N VALLI-11"Y No re g o to Council c for annual bud approval. Cit Manacrer approves Sue Oman 1 ) r g - r aTlflllad c()-tiferences and trainin throu Admin. Sec bud review. Department heads and Cit .545-3781 Mana approves sIpecific re Gle Olsen Dep. Pub .Safet Director 7. NE14 HOPE No re g o to Council except for annual bud approval. Detailed justification is Larr Watts prepared in bud process. Some funds are Finance Dir. provided for unpro travel and trainin 533-1521 General polic is to authorize attendance to re or nation al conference ever other y ear, unless indi-vidual holds an office in the association. NEW BRIGHTON No requests g o to Council except for annual bud approval. Eff.ort is made to identif A John Grau all re in budget process. Unpro-- Admin. Assist. arammed travel and trainincr can be approved 1 Departi-m 633-1533 with j ustif Lcatioll. ant heads approve re based on their bud -I r_ ll allowc-1-1, aces. Cit 'Mana approves a A. travel outside the 7-Count area. COLUIHBD HEIGHTS Each conference or school is a line item on annual bud An conferences or schools Jim Yantos over three (3) da-ys or total cost of $200.00 A C NLI is put - on an a for Council approval. All 788-9221 other travel and trainin approved-b supervisor and Cit Mana WEST ST. PAUL Ver restrictive. Travel .and trainin are - bud under the 'Ma and Counci 1 portion 0 Toni Haban of bud and is riot part of the departmental Cit Mana bud All- out of town trips are placed on 455- the Council- a Informal polic that one- department head ma g o to a. national conference each y ear (i.e., the Publ-ic. 14orl-c-s Director could g o once evel: five (5) ye-ars). c] / ( MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director Of Community Development SUBJECT: HRA Membership DATE: April 15 1980 - - In August Of 1979" Maria Larsen was appointed to the HRA to serve the remainder Of Dwight JessUp's appointment, ending March, 1980. At this time, Maria is requesting appointment to a full five year term with the HRA as a representative of the City's Human Relations Commission. The HRA supports Maria request for membership, . se April 25 1980 MEMORANDUM To: City Manager Barry Evans From: Chief of Police R. W. Schaller Subject: Request for Four --Way Stop Sign -- Lealand Road and Atlantic Street City Councilman Norman Anderson had relayed a citizen request for the installation of a four --way stop sign at the int -!rsection of Lealand Road and Atlantic Street. An on --site inspection reveals that at present there are yield right of way signs eastbound and westbound on Lealand Road. In addition, a block to the north at County Road B there is an arterial stop sign on Atlantic Street. A review of the accident incidence at this intersection indicates the follow -+_ng: 1970 1 Property Damage Accident 1971 0 Accidents 1972 0 Accidents 1973 1 Personal Injury Accident. 1974 1 Property Damage Accident 1975 0 Accidents 1976 0 Accidents 1977 1 Persona Injury Accident 1978 1 Property Damage Accident 1979 1 Personal Injury Accident I am attaching a report that I have received from the Public Works Director on this request. Staff recommends against any installation of a four --way stop signing at this intersection. However , the City may want to consider instal-ling arterial stop signs in place of the yield signs on Lealand Road. For your information. y RWS:js cc 80 Director of Public Works Councilman Anderson . N", �. , �'Y^1 � �� � � ero„'•nv1'rtwFrITI =nws_aP� C " F `. lJ 'ri• w'+ ^` ewe, v,..*+»«•' " ^.",- ,sW¢•.eon.- wca+ww.Kt'°w' �r e. /� ,S� /G �J ti C' ,y,/ ,-) 0 �q /. 6 t MEMORANDUM TO: Director of Public Safety PROM: Director of Public Works. - SUBJECT: Request for Four-- -way Stop - Atlantic and Leland DATE,. April 2 3 , 1980 As per our conversation, l have reviewed the need for a four-way stop sign installation at the above intersection. The intersection does not meet standard warrants for the installation of multi way stop signs. Traffic counts confirms that.. the intersection primarily serves the local neighborhood traffic. i i It .M t, MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: F`-eques t for four-way stop - Beano and Chippewa DATE: Povember 1, 1979 It is recommended that the request for a four --way stop sign installation at Beam Avenue and Chippewa Avenue be denied. ` A review of the intersection indicates it does not meet standard warrants for installation of a multiway stop sign. The intersection is comprised of a collector street and a local residential street and no additional traffic control devices appear to be necessary. It should be noted that this intersection is on the Forth St. Paul border and implementation of a four- -way stop condition would require approval by both communities. I would also express concern over what appears to be a precedent of establishing traffic control by public petition. Traffic management is one area. in which decisions made by the City directly impact . on public safety. Careful consideration should be given to any proposal which deviates from s tandard practices, Most elemeDts of traffic control management are regulated by the Manuel on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, published by the U. S. Department of Trans portat ion . The requirements of this manual have been adopted by the State of .Minnesota for use on all roads within the state and also have been adopted in the ordinances of the City of Maplewood. The manual provides guidelines for the use and installation of post traffic control devices including warrants for regulatory signs. These warrants have been developed by experts through a long history of traffic management and are designed to .provide uniformity and prevent some of the normal pitfalls associated with over - -signing or under -- signing of public roads. In recent months,, the City has acted on a number of requests for the installation of four --way stop signs* . Many of these requests have not met the minimum requirements for installation as established by sound traffic management practices and as indicated in the above mentioned • manual. In addition, the manual specifically indicates that stop signs should not be used for speed con.trol . I would suggest that the City guard carefully against the use of unnecessary stop signs for the foll owing. reasons: 1. If regulatory and warning signs are overused, their effectiveness can be destroyed. Disresepct for an unnecessary sign . is a common problem and can cause great enforcement difficulty. • �, ; F f •1 i M • 1 2 . `1'1 sire coma n .;:itua.t..i.ons t,7110170 ; lii1llC'_tI cill 1.117:1 j)prol)r . ate Can iidc3 t o une hara -d of a part icul�.�r = `1'Ili rebate' to t~:he dis r :' pect o Some driver's for an LlIlne:'.cess.ar }' top �n X.,711iIC otIIer C1r:iver_s a7.)cl 1) dec- tri —Ins arc C a four r-- wa s to p cond.:i_t1 ol:l.. 3 . S1. ,n:ing, not in conformance xvith ste nd ird practices c_oul.cl subsuLlat�_a;1.1_�T increase the City's liability orising from situations 1.n daiiidges, and injury dtie to roadway accidents . 4. Inapp _igna_n can ha ve an undesirable effect on the City over-c 1-rcI1 plan. Tliea City has spent considerable effort pre-paring a cor�l pr eh ens ive plan and a t ranspo rta t - i_on P 1. a n clefs 1� .IZ ; 1: ture� nee and es t lish facilities to provide for those needs- • Stop signinc), can drastically reduce roadway cap�icity and can substant:_j_al1_y alter travel habits. Installation of slop sign. - is on collector streets can divert traf t:ic to local" residcntial streets, r hies, burdening local streets and not util _ :ing the investment we have in, the collector systei.l• 5. Perbaps of .least concern is the uSe of additional gasoline. Th er e i s a mia f o r m ovem erg t in the I, i cl p a n t i e s in this co un try to pro vide the least n of step conditions possible a s an energy conservation effort. Ii ppropriate stop signs merely decrease the efficiency of motor travel. As standt dz rec. criteria cannot ant:icipat e all s:i_t.1utions, there w* 11 b` times wI)en de a tion f roar accepted practice is acs irable . T would suggest that We approacA.z slIch situations N.Y:it_h e- XtrCTT caut1_on so that we do not c IP,ore jj)roL than we s olve: by the tIc>e of over • •t r • Stop Si 1 STOP � si(.rz)s arc� ` �) far iisc c�xi i-o�zcl�� �vl ).c�•e traf.�jc �s L r�.'�)c� STOP :;) r�� : > lj;�ll l.�E�..c�l c)c;t.a ��Y)f:�� •1)lt.e. rlicc >s 1?a ._. dcr on a, x ��.�c�` z�otzzzd. � : iie s �lIidard- six,c shall bee X30 mc.1�cs b3` 30 i.n.ches. � IeTc z x-c�.atex elz ph<Isis 0r 1Tzs)bllzt•�. is �-cclu)rt.d, � l:cr c�,r. size, is rt;cc)zn III ell c1. 0 1 ~ 1c )ca .1 ::trec;fs and secoxl , a roads w) l ow p appr s }��,ed.s, a. 24 - by ��- iz�c }z size. xn ��� bE ifl useid. A t a. �nul fiv, � - jy ` ,-j op i nterscct.ion (sec. 2,3 should 1._) n�clrr)It���:, jj�st. 1 }e1o�� cash STOP si gn. �r p } - tlzE; nuinbar of approach 1c bon is three or n c1re, the )1) cral oil t ije- si. pplci ocn E.ary plate. shall c;ori - cspond to 0 b e, numbm— of leg or tie legend _ LL- A��.:�_Y (111-4)' 1 12 Y be, rzsed. The. supplcaient�Ir`� plate, shall ha.t•c V.h* .pe letters o)1 a re. 11 I�u1'e �� "randa.ra s'ze of 1 inches by G inches �.1 or 38" ill ches bv, 6 " 1 - ] cl cs I�rn b�� }con ar l, c�� icons rr�E46 b� 1)sec, i n conjunction. ) A STOP s � - a �;TOF si rn "'IS ci e.sc.ri i }c>d in >c.ct.i 4D-�. ` Sc:c;oJd�.- mcss��res sha1.1 }got �)e izs�.�d on STOP si�n� faces. `7 v 2B-5 'Warra)its for Stop Sign e~callsc the STOP siLrn caljse�s a suhstant -l'al incorivcnienc.c. to ` STOP Sign Mot�ori i ii s1j ()1_il d 1_):� U sc;d Onl ��-1 c;re �L; Z rrantea. �� he. warrantEvd at. an in< -c here orw. or ) of the ol- 1�1 Ov", <r c0Y] 010 ors ex] St : t t c `e r i� j �� n 1 "01:,r - r .. Inf..erse.c con of a Ic ss . raporf,arif� ro�..�� ���1 �:lz rr�� n A �. a pl)caf .i;�r� of f: }jc x�az al, ri4f, -of -�: ay ru ie is z.. elul p 1. Stz cnf. ;r i.n fr crb throu crh hl,(- a or st-reet. L 3. In a area.. . of } t,c:;.�:ey�f.zons N;' }� om> a corr:hinat.ior� of }lir�h s}�eed, rc_ tx'i c1 Srie ; cl snriar7 �A ce�i d t;n t, record indiuife:; a r�ccd for c;ar trot s , by Oh e. ST01 s1;771. TOP sipfz shou nc -v(,r be t)secl oil thC, fhroufrl - z ro��d�t k - of t, j .h , ��1. rr ro v3 d e e� preSsw. aY S Pror�:;rly c l )1)fcr,.�� p > 1 for f co21ti_nvOUs fl og - a7 t:r )r ��l�y.Ir... STOP s) ern s 11n.n eccss81rt' c;��er� on t�)e cnt.c;rlr) ro<zcl r,�•�z DTs. t: of - r�tc_le i.7i er c�ct) r] �i.re. r r �.� - s �, l t1•aIC in spy r.�el' }ol }t�l af;d a� - c:L:s tcznpor.).ril - or j il "J�lt�,�t f I:'a j } ; 170p Si fTn�� sljaj.ld l_�e zl(>C;c� 01 tlje, c))tez i z�L 7�oa d�7. a 7s to })r. c)fr;�t flee 2_ through trafijc. 5 ' Ir{lso bt; rt;cluire'a at f }:1� dive,rcrin< 1_0 , ".G A's t 01 iritc rsect.i0D )1rSl rat C�t✓c) c t '11t�C� a�i t� )fir: 5��'aVS. In. rj - j oM. of f �IC:Se C;�3 -( Sc tljE; S�.�E <.t�C�s not 2� an.�' g - r•c'A IT1C.r f.; j.:�C', lit th c, s gr) 11,C:S. J ._. 32 I M ll' . STOP si(I - TIS 110t, IAN Ci•c.cti(1 at, Inners ctic'-Izs where t•raflle Col si,�l�als aril ol)(n '1111. c;onfiict.iz��� cr�r7�rs��cnds of two L,yp(� s of control &Nic;cs iu c ol) flisillc;. If t•l-afiic is 1 to stop -w-ll.erz t. -llc: c>pcz "atiozl of the. stop ;lI1d-too 5i ,1111t is nc�t• `i-.zr`ranted, dies signals should be, put, on ll,i ;l�ir��; �' >c;r�Ltic�zz \V nth tl)c zed llasalzi_zl`, . li(rht faci11g tllc tr"ii"ic tha 1n.1.tst. st.c)p. Whw-e t - o main hio;lnv..ys iiitersect, the; STOP siL n or Si gns Should. n.orn—ud.ly be, posted on Ow minor street; to stole the lesser `low. of tra c.. Ti D -file _?"l ieS, 1 zON- Ve Inay' ju stI ' fy a dc:ci Sion. to 11 st all. S 1. Q f. S1�rI1 or 5 1 ZS Oil the, znsi.,or sI,T'Ge,t, as at a. . three -wa.y intersection whe r (, Sal ty� coz lsidcratlons i - j.iay justify- stop- ping tho. �rti,at flow of traf'k to p::rmit a left- f;urli,211 " rnovell - lernt. ZD For other than E�zxaerrcncy purposes portable, or part - time ST si gns sh -all not be, usE:d . STOP signs should not he used fo speed cuntrol. 2B-6 - ul fhv tyr Stop Sims The Stop" in s f, l l .tion i s u seful as a sa f ety7 m E> a.sure, at some locations. It should ordinarily be used only where th(t volume of t OI the 1I1t.e.ISE•t;t111.( r. pads is a pproximate ly equal. A tragic control sitcrnal is more satisfactory for an intersection wit1 `D a h eavy , v of t•ra f Anv of the folloN\-i - nc corid3tions may warrant a. rnultiwa•yT STOP Sign installr.tiolz (sr:^. 2f--) 1. Y tThercA trc4Mc, signals arc xv arranted an urgently needed, the: multi fvay stop is an inter nn rrieasure that. ctLn be installed o u_ich -) -v to control traf:xic Njhlle. arraAn� evicnts a re, b� ,, ink m a de; for the s , rrzza xnstna.11a tier.. 2. An accident problem, as indicated 1 -)v five or more reportp..,d accicler s of a tyyr)e suscept.'ble of correction by a 3711z1t1ti��acr sf.op insta.11a,tion in a 12 -month pr riod. Suc }1 ficcid(;nts> include right - and 1 E;f t. -turn co il)' S, ons as ��'(;l � as right -an g (, col 1 Tsl oI1s. 3. M inimum traffic: v o lumes : (a) The totlal vehicular N C el)u.;rinti the intr.:rscction from all fkpproaches rnustp f1verz rc; fit least 500 veil - Jeles per hour for any 8 hours of an a.ver a( - re day•, and (b) The, con vc hicula.r .. pe= destr vo lume, from tlz(; minor strc(;t or lei.rrin midst a,vcr,,i at least 200 urilts per houx Tor t he; salrie 8 h oilz - s, wnth :in delay to inn-lor Street, ve- hicular t rafilc of at kart 30 seconds 1 )cr -vehicle magiijg the Inaxi -- xnum Dour, but (c) A' hCD. the� appro.Ich speed of the, major street traffic, exceeds 40 -milc:s p(: h our, t-•he. minirnum V(A1icul�Lr vC1111I;11:� . NVIrrL ant is, 70 percent of the/ above; re'(31111 33 J 2 13- -6 ............................. .