Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980 02-21 City Council Packetfi AGENDA Mat)lewood City Council 7:30 P.M., Thursday, February 21, 1980 Municipal Administration Building Meeting 80 - 4 (A) CALL TO ORDER (B) ROLL CAT L (C) APPROVAL of MINUTES 1. Minutes 80 -3 (.February 7 ) (D) APPROVAL - OF AGENDA (E) CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent are considered to be routine by the City Council and will-be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There.. will `'be no separate discussion on these items. If discussion is = desired, that i will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 10 Accounts Payable. 20 Ordinance: Outlot Definition (Second Reading) . 3.. State Fire Marshal Inspection Enforcement Training Course. 4 . Minnesota Municipal Finance officers' Association Annual Conference .(Finance Director) . 50 Financial Transfers to Close Improvement Projects* -' 60, Interf_und Transfers - Engineering and Administrative Charges. 7. Engineering Services - North Hazelwood Project 8, AFSCME Contracts. 90 H : R. A Appointment 100 Designation of Impound Lot and Towing Contractor for 1980, 11. - Minnesota Recreation and Park Association St. Cloud (Director and Program Coordinator). (F) PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Condor Storm Sewer (7:30) 2. Street and Alley-Vacation Lot Splits: Sandhurst Avenue (Council) (7 :45) 30 A11e Vacation - West of Birmingham St - . (Ar -Mon . Properties (8:00) y. (G) AWARD OF BIDS - None (H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None (I} VISITOR PRESENT (J) NEW BUSINESS 1.. Time Extension English Manor (Ar -Mon Properties)____ 2. Plan Review Appeal: Sherwin Wii.liams 3. Quad. Design Ordinance. First e��ding 4. Planning. Consultant Contract 5. Resolution on Intent to Become an Entitlement Area 6. Carry Over o 1.979 Budget Monies to 1980 7, Carry Over of 1979 Budget Monies to 1980 -- Civil Defense ( CODICIL PRESENTATIONS. 1. . 2. 3. 4 • 5. 6. 7* 8 10. (I,) : ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATION MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:30 P.M., Thursday, February 7, 1980 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 80-3 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilman Present Gary W.Bastian, Councilman Present Frances L. Joker, Councilperson Present Earl L. Nelson, Councilman Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes No. 80-2 (January 17, 1980) Councilman Nelson moved that the Minutes of Meeting No. 80-2 (January 17, 1980) be approved as submitted. Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes - all. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the agenda as amended: 1. School Closing 2. Reconsideration 3. White Bear Avenue - County Road B and Highway 36 4. Maryland Avenue 5. Building Inspections 6. Meeting on Thursday 7. Wage Negotiations 8. Staff Cars 9. C.C.Ludwig Award Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Council removed Items 2, 5 and 6 from the Consent Agenda to become Items J-8, 9 and 10. Councilman Nelson moved, seconded by Councilman Anderson, Ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda Items 1 thru 14 as recommended. 1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part I - Fees, Services and Expenses, Check No. 003959 through Check No. 003996 - $83,797.31; Check No. 004399 through Check No. 004614 - $329,231.37: Part II - Payroll - Check No. 23097 through Check No. 23231 - $50,783.27; Check No. -1- 2/7 23232 through Check No. 23358 - $48,145.07) in the amount of $511,957.02. 2. Uncollectible Developers Bill Approved the City Attorney's recommendation to cancel the developer's bill for Desoto Park, Inc. and a transfer from the General Fund be authorized effective December 31, 1979, to finance the remaining project costs of $2,944.01. 3. Purchase of Police Vehicles (Replacement - Squad 9907) Resolution No. 80-2-36 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COU14CIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Midway Ford in the amount of $5,118.00 is the lowest responsible bid for the purchase of a police vehicle to replace Squad No. 9907 and the Mayor and Clerk are authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Authorized the following budget transfers: The transfer of $1,300.00 from the police department's Repair and Maintenance of Vehicle account for 1980 to the Capital Outlay Vehicles account and the transfer of $3,820 from the Contingency account to the Police Capital Outlay Vehicles account. 4. 1980 Neighborhood Park Charge Approved the Park and Recreation Commission recommendation that the park charge fees remain the same for 1980 - $4,000 per acre for acquisition and $7,500 per acre for development. 5. Environmental Health Service Contract - Ramsey County Resolution No. 80-2-37 WHEREAS, the Municipality wishes to provide Community Health Services under the Community Health Services Act of 1976; and WHEREAS, funds are available from the Minnesota Department of Health for the provision of Community Health Services; and WHEREAS, the County wishes to support such services. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings and agreements herein- after set forth, the County and the Municipality enter into the 1980 contract for en- vironmental health services. 6. 1980 Proposed Animal Control Contract Authorized the agreement between the City and M.A.P.S.I, for 1980 Animal Control as proposed. 7. National Planning Conference - Director of Community Development Approved the travel and training application of Director of Community Development to attend the American Planning Association National Conference in San Francisco, April 12 through 16, 1980. - 2 - 2/7 8. Community Design Review Board Annual Report Accepted the 1979 Annual Community Design Review Board report. 9. Quit Claim Deed - Maplewood (Rank) Authorized the Mayor and Clerk to execute the quit claim deed for Robert and Judy Rank for the purpose of correcting the alignment of an easement. 10. Contract Amendment No. 2 - Maryland Avenue Resolution No. 80-2-38 WHEREAS: A. The City Council of the City of Maplewood has heretofore ordered made improve- ment Project No. 77-12 and has let a construction contract therefor pursuant to Minn- esota Statutes Chapter 429. B. Said construction contract was awarded on a unit price basis for a total con- tract price of $1,232,108.95. C. It is necessary and expedient that said contract be modified so as to delete units of work (designated as Improvement Project No. 77-12) resulting in a net decrease of $11,588.50. D. A Supplemental Agreement, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, has been presented to the Council for the purpose of effecting such modification. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINN- ESOTA, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract with respect to Project No. 77-12 by executing said Supplemental Agreement. 11. 1979 Park and Recreation Commission Annual Report Accepted the 1979 Park and Recreation Commission Report. 12. Resolution - $350,000 Commercial Development Revenue Note Resolution No. 80-2-39 A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF REVENUE NOTE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 474, MINNESOTA STATUTES, TO PROVIDE FUNDS TO BE LOANED TO MAPLEWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND APPROVING LOAN AGREEMENT, LOAN AGREEMENT ASSIGNMENT, CONSTRUCTION LOAN AGREEMENT, DISBURSING AGREEMENT, MORTGAGE AND SECURITY AGREEMENT AND FIXTURE FINANCING STATEMENT, GUARANTY, SPECIFIC LEASE ASSIGNMENT, GENERAL LEASE ASSIGNMENT AND BUY AND SELL AGREEMENT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: - 3 - 2/7 1. Authority. The City is, by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minn- esota, including Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, as amended (the "Act"), authorized to issue and sell its revenue notes for the purpose of financing the cost of author- ized projects and to enter into contracts necessary or convenient in the exercise of the powers granted by the Act. 2. Authorization of Project; Documents Presented. This Council proposes that the City shall issue and sell its City of Maplewood Commercial Development Revenue Note (Maplewood Industrial Park Project --Product Manufacturing, Inc., Lessee) in substant- ially the form set forth in Exhibit A to the hereinafter -defined Loan Agreement (the "Note"), pursuant to the Act and loan the proceeds thereof to Maplewood Industrial Park, a Minnesota general partnership (the "Borrower"), to finance the construction of a building addition to its existing facility in the City, and the acquisition and in- stallation of equipment therefor, together with any site improvements required in relation thereto, all to be owned by the Borrower and leased to Product Manufacturing, Inc. (the "Lessee'), and partially to be used by the Lessee in its business and partially to be subleased to other tenants (the "Project"), all pursuant to the Act. Forms of the following documents relating to the Note and the Project have been submitted to the City Council and are now on file in the office of the City Clerk: (a) Loan Agreement (the "Loan Agreement") dated as of January 1, 1980, between the City and the Borrower, whereby the City agrees to make a loan to the Borrower and the Borrower agrees to complete the Project and to pay amounts sufficient to provide for the full and prompt payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Note; (b) Loan Agreement Assignment (the "Assignment"), dated as of January 1, 1980, from the City to American National Bank and Trust Company, in St. Paul, Minnesota (the "Mortgagee"), whereby the City assigns its interest in the Loan Agreement to the Mortgagee as security for the Note; (c) Construction Loan Agreement (the "Construction Loan Agreement"), dated as of January 1, 1980, by and among the City, the Mortgagee and the Borrower, providing for the purchase of the Note by the Mortgagee and the making of advances thereunder from the Mortgagee to the Borrower; (d) Disbursing Agreement (the "Disbursing Agreement"), dated as of January 1, 1980, by and between the Mortgagee and Title Insurance Company of Minnesota (the "Disbursing Agent"), whereby, subject to the conditions therein stated, the Disbursing Agent agrees to disburse advances to be made by the Mortgagee under the Construction Loan Agreement (this document not to be executed by the City); (e) Mortgage and Security Agreement and Fixture Financing Statement (the "Mortgage"), dated as of January 1, 1980, between the Borrower and the Mortgagee, by which the Bor- rower grants to the Mortgagee a mortgage lien on and security interest in the Premises, as defined therein, as security for the payment of the Note (this document not to be executed by the City); (f.) Guaranty Agreement (the "Guaranty"), dated as of January 1, 1980, from Steven Olson and Glen Olson (the "Guarantors") to the Mortgagee, whereby the Guarantors jointly and severally guarantee to the Mortgagee the full and prompt payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Note (this document not to be executed by the City); - 4 - 2/7 (g). Assignment of Lease (the "Specific Lease Assignment") dated as of January 1, 1980, from the Borrower to the Mortgagee, assigning to the Mortgagee the Borrower's interest in the Lease between the Borrower, as lessor, and the Lessee, as additional security for the payment of the Note (this document not to be executed by the City); (h) Assignment of Rents and Leases (the "General Lease Assignment"), dated as of January 1, 1980, from the Borrower to the Mortgagee, assigning to the Mortgagee the Borrower's interest in all rents and income from the Premises and any leases of the Project as additional security for the payment of the Note (this document not to be executed by the City); and (i) Buy and Sell Agreement (the "Buy and Sell Agreement"), dated as of January 1, 1980, by and among the Mortgagee, Northwestern National Life Insurance Company (the "Permanent Lender") and the Borrower, whereby the Permanent Lender agrees, at the com- pletion of the Project, and subject to the conditions therein stated, to purchase from the Mortgagee the Note and to accept assignment of the instruments providing security therefor (this document not to be executed by the City). 3. Findings. It is hereby found, determined and declared that: (a) The Project, as described in paragraph 2 above and in the Loan Agreement, con- stitutes a project authorized by and described in Section 474.02, Subd, la, of the Act, and furthers the general purposes contemplated by and described in Section 474.01 of the Act. (b) The purpose of the Project is and the effect thereof will be to promote the public welfare by: preventing the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; preventing economic deterioration; the development of sound industry and commerece to use the available resources of the community, in order to retain the benefit of the community's existing investment in educational and public service facilities; halting the movement of talented, educated personnel to other areas thus preserving the economic and human resources needed as a base for provid- ing governmental services and facilities; and increasing the tax base of the City and the county and school district in which the Project is located. (c) The Project has been approved by the Commissioner of Securities of the State of Minnesota as tending to further the purposes and policies of the Act. (d) The issuance and sale of the Note, the execution and delivery of the Loan Agreement, the Construction Loan Agreement and the Assignment and the performance of all covenants and agreements of the City contained in the Note, the Loan Agreement, the Construction Loan Agreement, and the Assignment. and of all other acts of the City and the State of Minnesota to make the Loan Agreement, the Construction Loan Agreement, the Assignment and the Note valid and binding obligations of the City in accordance with their terms, are authorized by the Act. (e) It is desirable that the Note, in the principal amount of $350,000, be issued by the City upon the terms set forth herein and in the Loan Agreement, and that the City's interest in the Loan Agreement be assigned to the Mortgagee pursuant to the Assignment as security for the payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Note. (f) The Loan Agreement provides for payments by the Borrower to the Mortgagee for the account of the City of such amounts as will be sufficient to pay the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Note when due. The Loan Agreement obligates the Borrower to pay all expenses of the operation and maintenance of the Project in- cluding, but without limitation, adequate insurance thereon and insurance against all - 5 - 2/7 liability for injury to persons or property arising from the operation thereof, and all taxes and special assessments levied upon or with respect to the Project and payable during the term of the Loan Agreement. (g) Under the provisions of Section 474.10, Minnesota Statutes, the Note is not to be payable from nor charged upon any funds other than amounts payable by the Bor- rower pursuant to the Loan Agreement which are pledged to the payment thereof, or amounts payable under the Guaranty or moneys received upon disposition of the Mortgaged Property under the Mortgage; the City is not subject to any liability thereon; no holder of the Note shall ever have the right to compel the exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the Note or the interest thereon, nor to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City; the Note shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City, other than its interest in the Loan Agreement; and the Note shall recite that the Note, including interest thereon, shall not constttute nor give rise to a pecuniary liability- of the City or a charge against its general credit or taxing powers and that the Note does not constitute an indebtedness of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statuatory provision. 4. Approval and Execution of Documents. The forms of Loan Agreement, Assignment, Construction Loan Agreement, Disbursing Agreement, Mortgage, Guaranty, Specific Lease Assignment, General Lease Assignment and Buy and Sell Agreement, referred to in para- graph 2, are approved. The Loan Agreement, Assignment, and Construction Loan Agreement shall be executed in the name and on behalf of the City by its Mayor and City Manager, or by other appropriate officers of the City authorized to execute documents on their behalf, in substantially the form on file, but with all such changes therein, not in- consistent with the Act or other law, as may be approved by the officers executing the same, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by the execution thereof. Copies of all documents shall be delivered and filed as provided therein; The Mortgage, Dis- bursing Agreement, Guaranty, Specific Lease Assignment, General Lease Assignment and Buy and Sell Agreement may contain such revisions as may be approved by the Mortgage, the Permanent Lender and the parties executing the same. 5. Approval, Execution and Delivery of Note. The City shall proceed forthwith to issue the Note, to be dated the date of delivery, in the principal amount of $350,000, in the form and containing the terms set forth in the form of Note attached as Exhibit A to the Loan Agreement, which form and terms are hereby incorporated by reference herein to the same extent as if set forth herein in full. The proposal of the Mortgagee to purchase the Note at a price of $350,000 (100% of its par value) by making advances in accordance with the Construction Loan Agreement is hereby found and determined to be reasonable and is hereby accepted. The Note shall be prepared in typewritten form sub- stantially in the form set forth in Exhibit A to the Loan Agreement. The Note shall be executed by the manual signatures of the Mayor and City Manager and attested by the manual signature of the City Clerk, and the official seal of the City shall be affixed thereto. When so prepared and executed the Note shall be delivered to the Mortgagee upon receipt of the purchase price therefor, which may be paid to the parties entitled to receive the loan proceeds in accordance with the Construction Loan Agreement and the Loan Agreement. The Note shall contain a recital that it is issued pursuant to the Act, and such recital shall be conclusive evidence of the validity and regularity of the issuance thereof. 6. Registration Records. The City Clerk, as Note Registrar, shall keep a Note Register in which the City shall provide for the registration of the Note and for transfers of the Note. The principal of and interest on the Note shall be payable to the Mortgagee or registered assigns in lawful money of the United States of America at the address of the Mortgagee or registered assigns as shown on the Note Register. - 6 - 2/7 7. Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Note. If the Note is mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed, the City may execute and deliver to the registered owner of a new Note of the like date, number, maturity and tenor as that mutilation, the mutilated Note shall first be surrendered to the City, and in the case of a lost, stolen or des- troyed Note, there shall be first furnished to the City and the Borrower evidence of such loss, theft or destruction satisfactory to the City and the Borrower together with indemnity satisfactory to them. The City may charge the Noteholder with its reasonable fees and expenses in this connection. 8. Transfer of Note; Person Treated as Owner. The Note shall be transferable by the registered owner on the Note Register of the City, upon presentation of the Note for notation of such transfer thereon at the office of the City Clerk, as Note Registrar, accompanied by a written instrument of transfer in form satisfactory to the Note Regis- trar duly executed by the registered owner or its attorney duly authorized in writing. The registered owner seeking to transfer ownership of the Note shall also give written notice thereof to the Borrower. The Note shall continue to be subject to successive transfers at the option of the registered owner of the Note. No service charge, shall be made for any such transfer, but the Note Registrar may require payment of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge payable in connection therewith. The person in whose name the Note shall be registered from time to time shall be deemed and regarded as the absolute owner thereof for all purposes, and payment of or on account of the principal of and interest on the Note shall be made only to or upon the order of the owner thereof, or its attorney duly authorized in writing, and neither the City, the Note Registrar nor the Borrower shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. All such payment shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liablility upon the Note to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. 9. Amendments, Changes and Modifications to Loan Agreement Construction Loan Agreement, Assignment and Note Resolution. The City shall not, without the written consent of the Mortgagee, enter into any agreement, change, modification, alteration or termination of the Loan Agreement, the Construction Loan Agreement, the Assignment or this Note Resolution. 10. Certificates, etc. The Mayor, City Manager and City Clerk and other officers of the City are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the purchaser of the Note, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to the Note, and such other affidavits and certificates as may be required to show the facts appear- ing from the books and records in such officers' custody and control or as otherwise known to them; and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute representations of the City as to the truth of all statements contained therein. All such documents to be executed by the City are subject to approval by the special counsel to the City. 13. Resolution - Canceling Assessment on Miklas Property Resolution No. 80-2-40 A RESOLUTION requesting cancellation and removal from taxation records in the office of the Director of Property Taxation, Ramsey County, Minnesota, the assessments levied and identified by Ramsey County Code, Year Levied and Amount of Tax to be Cancelled, as follows: RAMSEY COUNTY CODE 57 01200 040 50 YEAR LEVIED TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE CANCELLED 1979 $8,560.68 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, acquired the above identified property - 7 - 2/7 by negotiation from Mary Jane Miklas, divorced and unmarried, by a Warranty Deed dated August 2, 1979, for Vista Hills Park, Maplewood, Minnesota, partially described as follows, viz: UNPLATTED LANDS, Part of East 30 acres of NE 1/4 of SW 1/4, Section 12, Township 28N, Range 22W, Ramsey County, Minnesota NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the Special Assessments, Identified by Ramsey County Code, Year Levied, and Total Amount of Tax Levied as above set out be CANCELLED and removed from the taxation re- cords of the Director of Taxation, Ramsey County, Minnesota. 14. Resolution - Canceling Assessment on G.C. Rehnberg's 1st Addition Resolution No. 80-2-41 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution 59-9-76 and 70-9-133 of the City Council of Maple- wood, Minnesota, adopted September 3, 1959 and September 1, 1970, the special assessments for the construction of Sanitary Sewer No. 1 and Water Improvement 66-9 were levied against property described as 57 62750 010 01; and WHEREAS, the above described property was assessed in 1979 and the above stated assessment is to be refunded in the amount of $1,420.00; ($595.00 Sanitary Sewer No. 1; $825.00 Water Improvement 69-9); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the assessments for Sanitary Sewer No. 1 and Water Improvement 66-9, in the amount against 57 62750 010 01 be, and the same hereby are refunded. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Plan Amendment/Rezoning: 2335 Stillwater Road - John - 7:30 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing for the request of Donald John to rezone Lot 6, Auditors Subdivision No. 77 from R-1 (Single Family Residence)and R-3 (Multiple) to BC (Business Commercial). The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in order and noted the dates of publication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report with the following recommendation: I. Denial of the rezoning to BC, Business Commercial, due to there being no justification for the zone change. II. Approval of a Home Occupation permit to allow the applicant to use his dwelling as an office for his construction company, providing that: a. There shall be no storage of any job related materials, equipment, vehicles, or the parking of employee's vehicles in the area adjacent to Stillwater Road. b. The applicant may park these vehicles and equipment on the subject lot in the clearing north of his new home. c. The home occupation is subject to review by the City Council one year after approval, to see if any nuisances are being created. d. This permit shall terminate when the surrounding Rh designated area begins to develop. _ R _ 2/7 III. Denial of the proposed Land Use Plan amendment, due to the absence of substantial justification for the request. C. Commissioner Duane Prow presented the following Planning Commission recommend- ation: "Commissioner Sherburne moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Land Use Plan amendment for the subject lot from Rh, High Density Resident- ial to SC, Service Commercial based on the neighborhood support for the proposal and the unlikely ultimate development of that area into Rh. Commissioner Kishel seconded. Ayes - 8 Nays - 1 (Commissioner Howard) Commissioner Sherburne moved the staff be directed to investigate the feasibility of making the northern strip of Stillwater Road between Sarracks at 2305 Stillwater Road and the subject property as all SC, Service Commercial as part of the Plan re -write and to be covered in those hearings. Commissioner Fischer seconded. Ayes all.. Commissioner Sherburne moved that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council rezoning of the subject property from R-3 and R-1 to BC (M), Business Commercial (Modified) based on the neighborhood support for the applicant's proposal and utilizing the BC (M) zone rather than the requested BC, Business Commercial because of its more restrictive nature and that it would allow Mr. John to proceed with his proposal. Commissioner Kishel seconded. Ayes 8 Nays 1 (Commissioner Howard)." d. The applicant, Mr. Donald John, spoke on behalf of the proposal. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. The following were heard: Mr. Mike Klein, 2334 Stillwater Road; Mr. Joseph Miller, 2327 Stillwater Road. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard: Mrs. Englebretson, speaking for Mrs. Albert Lepsche, 840 No. McKnight Road; Mrs. Joseph (Aileen), Fritsch, 812 No. McKnight Road. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 80-2-42 WHEREAS, a petition was filed with the Council of the City of Maplewood by the owner of the following described property, and a hearing was set as provided under Section 915.020 of the Municipal Code of the City of Maplewood: Lot 6, Auditors Subdivision No. 77 which has been proposed for rezoning from R-1 (Single Family) and R-3 (Multiple) to BC-M (Business -Commercial Modified); and - 9 - 2/7 WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on February 7, 1980 at 7:30 P.M. in the City Hall, notice thereof having been duly published in the official City news- paper, and notices of said hearing having been mailed to all property owners of record within 350 feet of the area proposed for rezoning; and WHEREAS, all objections and recommendations relative thereto were heard by the City Council; and WHEREAS, it appears for the best interest of the public that said petition be granted; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, that the petition for the above described rezoning be granted. Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all. i. Councilman Nelson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 80- 2-43 WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council and the Maplewood Planning Commission have prepared and adopted a Comprehensive Community Plan in compliance with the require- ments of Section 462.355 of the State Planning Enabling Legislation; and WHEREAS, said Section 462.355 provides for subsequent amendment of said Com- prehensive Plan which reflect changed conditions; and WHEREAS, the Maplewood Planning Commission has conducted the required public hearing and has given consideration to all evidence and testimony submitted at such hearing held on February 4, 1980 and has adopted said amendment and forwarded said amendment to the City Council for certification; and WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council has reviewed said amendment; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maplewood City Council hereby adopts and amends the Comprehensive Plan for Maplewood. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. Mayor Greavu recessed the meeting at 8:23 P.M. to convene as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Mayor Greavu reconvened the meeting at 8:30 P.M. 3. Preliminary Plat - Schwichtenberg Addition - 8:00 P.M. a. The applicant has requested this public hearing be cancelled at this time. b. Mayor Greavu moved to deny the request for approval of for Schwichtenberg Addition. Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all. 4. Commercial Revenue Note - Cope Avenue - Nordstrand - 8:15 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Burt Nordstrand and Associates for Commercial Revenue Note financing to con- - 10 - 2/7 struct a 6,000 square foot professional office on Cope Avenue just west of White Bear Avenue. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in order and noted the dates of publication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Commissioner Duane Prew presented the following Planning Commission recommend- ation: "Commissioner Fischer moved that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the application for Commercial Revenue Note,,,financing on the basis that the project meets the criteria outlined by the Council. Commissioner Pellish seconded. Ayes - all." d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilman Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 80-2-45 RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF SAID PROJECT TO THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH SAID PROJECT WHEREAS, (a) The purpose of Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, known as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (the "Act") as found and determined by the legislature is to promote the welfare of the state by the active attraction and encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to prevent as far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; (b) Factors necessitating the active promotion and development of economically sound industry and commerce are the increasing concentration of population in the metropolitan areas and the rapidly rising increase in the amount and cost of govern- mental services required to meet the needs of the increased population and the need for development of land use which will provide an adequate tax base to finance these increased costs and access to employment opportunities for such population; (c) The City Council of the City of Maplewood ("the City") has received from Burt Norstrand & Associates, sole proprietorship formed under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the "Company") a proposal that the City assist in financing a Project hereinafter described, through the issuance of a Revenue Bond or Bonds or a Revenue Note or Notes hereinafter referred to in this resolution as "Revenue Bonds" pursuant to the Act; (d) The City desires to facilitate the selective development of the community, retain and improve its tax base and help it provide the range of services and employ- ment opportunities required by its population; and said Project will assist the City in achieving those objectives. The Project will help to increase assessed valuation of the City and help maintain a positive relationship between assessed valuation and debt and enhance the image and reputation of the City; (e) Company is currently engaged in the business of developing commercial real estate. The Project to be financed by the Revenue Bonds is a 6,000 square foot pro- fessional office building to be located in the City and leased to doctors, dentists, accountants, and other professionals and consists of the construction of buildings and improvements thereon, and will result in the employment of additional persons to work within the new facilities; (f) The City has been advised by representatives of Company that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital cost of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the Project would be significantly reduced, but Company has also advised this Council that with the aid of municipal financing, and its resulting low borrow- ing cost, the Project is economically more feasible; (g) Pursuant to a resolution of the City Council adopted on January 17 , 1990, a public hearing on the Project was held on Feb. 7 , 1980, after notice was published, and materials made available for public inspection at the City Hall, all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b at which public hearing all those appearing at said hearing so desired to speak were heard; (h) No public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly benefit financially from the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minn- esota, as follows: 1. The Council hereby gives preliminary approval to the proposal of Company that the City undertake the Project pursuant to the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Develop- ment Act (Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes), consisting of the acquisition, construction and equipping of facilities within the City pursuant to Company's specifications suit- able for the operations described above and gives preliminary approval to a revenue agreement between the City and Company upon such terms and conditions with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary, so as to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal of and interest on the Revenue Bonds in the total principal amount of approximately $ to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project; and the City hereby undertakes preliminarily to issue its Revenue Bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions; 2. On the basis of information available to this Council it appears, and the Council hereby finds, that the Project constitutes properties, real and personal, used or useful in connection with one or more revenue producing enterprises engaged in any - 12 - 2/7 business within the meaning of Subdivision Is of Section 474.02 of the Act, that the Project furthers the purposes stated in Section 474.01, Minnesota Statutes; that the availability of the financing under the Act and willingness of the City to furnish such financing will be a substantial inducement to Company to undertake the Project, and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the development of economically sound industry and commerce, to assist in the prevention of the emer- gence of blighted and marginal land, to help prevent chronic unemployment, to help the City retain and improve its tax base and provide the range of services and employ- ment opportunities required by its population, to help prevent the movement of talented and educated persons out of the state and to areas within the State where their services may not be as effectively used, to promote more intensive development and use of land within the City and to eventually increase the City's tax base; 3. The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by the City subject to the approval of the Project by the Commissioner of Securities, and subject to final approval by this Council, Company, and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the ultimate details of the financing of the Project; 4. In accordance with Subdivision 7a of Section 474.01 Minnesota Statutes, the Mayor of the City is hereby authorized and directed to submit the proposal for the Project to the Commissioner of Securities, requesting the Commissioner's approval, and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide the Commissioner with such preliminary information as the Commissioner may require; 5. Company has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project whether or not the Project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by the Commissioner will be paid by Company. 6. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, and Juran & Moody, investment bankers, are authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Project, to consult with the City Attorney, Company and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms and provisions of the Revenue Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary documents and to submit such documents to the Council for final approval; 7. Nothing in this resolution or in the documents prepared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose. The Rev- enue Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or funds of the City except the revenue and proceeds pledged to the pay- ment thereof, nor shall the City be subject to any liability thereon. The holder of the Revenue Bonds shall never have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the outstanding principal on the Revenue Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City. The Revenue Bonds shall recite in substance that the Revenue Bonds, including interest thereon, are payable solely from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any con- stitutional or statutory limitation; 8. In anticipation of the approval by the Commissioner of Securities and the issuance of the Revenue Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Project, and in order that completion of the Project will not be unduly delayed when approved, Company is hereby authorized to make such expenditures and advances toward payment of that portion of the costs of the Project to be financed from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds as Company considers necessary, including the use of interim, short-term financing, sub- - 13 - 2/7 ject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds if and when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the City. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. G. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Recreation Department - Van Ayes - all. a. Manager Evans presented the staff report recommending the bid of Rosedale Chevrolet in the amount of $8,497.88 be accepted for the purchase of a one ton twelve passenger window van for the Community Services Department. b. Councilman Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 80-2-46 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Rosedale Chevrolet in the amount of $8,497.88 for the purchase of a one ton twelve passenger van and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Payments to Members of Advisory Boards and Commissions a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mr. Ed O'Mara, 1786 Maryknoll Avenue, a member of the Civil Service Commission, stated he was opposed to this proposal. c. No action taken. Councilman Anderson stated he wished to express his appreci- ation for the endeavors of the volunteer committees. 2. P.U.D., Preliminary Plat - Cave's Century Addition a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilman Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 80-2-47 WHEREAS, a petition was filed with the City of Maplewood as provided under Section 915.010 of the Municipal Code of the City of Maplewood, said petition having been signed by more than 50% of the owners of property within 200 feet of the property described as follows: That part of the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 24, Township 29, Range 22, lying North of Myhra Addition, except the North 435 ft of the east 409.5 ft of said SE 1/4 of SE 1/4 and Lots 1 through 11, Block 2, Myhra Addition which has been proposed for Special Use Permit. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on January 3, 1980 at 8:00 P.M. in the City Hall, notice thereof having been duly published in the official City newspaper, and - 14 - 2/7 notices of said hearing having been mailed to all property owners of record within 200 feet of the area proposed for Special Use Permit for Planned Unit Development to construct 29 single dwellings, 21 double dwellings and 17 fourplexes; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission has made its recommendations; and WHEREAS, it appears for the best interest of the public that said petition be granted; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the petition for the above described Special Use Permit for Planned Unit Development to construct 29 single dwellings, 21 double dwellings and 17 four- plexes be granted, subject to all conditions contained in the Planning Commission report. Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all. c. Councilman Bastian moved to approve the preliminary plat for Cave's Century Addition subject to the conditions given in the Planning Commission report. Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all. 3. Special Use Permit: Payne Avenue and Roselawn Avenue a. Manager Evans stated Council asked that this item be placed on the agenda at the January 17 meeting. Staff has notified the affected property owners of the meeting. b. City Attorney Don Lais explained a new ruling issued by the Supreme Court that could affect this proposal. c. Mr. George Ostrand, the applicant, spoke on behalf of his proposal. d. Senator Jerome Hughes, representing the neighbors oppose the double dwelling in a R-1 zoned property. e. Councilman Anderson moved to refer this matter to the Planning Commission. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 4. Zoning Code Amendment: Outlot Definition a. Manager Evans stated Council gave first reading to this Ordinance on January 17 and referred it to the City Attorney for review. The proposed ordinance has been revised and first reading is recommended. b. Councilman Anderson moved first reading of the revised ordinance regarding outlot definitions. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 5. Alarm Ordinance - Second Reading a. Manager Evans presented staff report. b. Councilman Bastian moved to table this proposed ordinance until the first meeting in March to allow further study. - 15 - 2/7 Seconded by Councilman Nelson. I. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. John Kavanagh Ayes - all. a. Mr. Kavanagh stated he was the owner of the property that the City was attempt- ing to acquire for park purposes on Cope Avenue. He had requested a copy of the appraisal that the City Attorney had ordered for this property and the City Attorney had let him see the appraisal, but not have a copy. b. City Attorney Lais stated this was proper since the City is negotiating for this property and also since Mr. Kavanagh has refused the City's offer, this may have to f;o to condemnation. c. No action taken. J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Plan Amendment - 2315-2329 Stillwater Road - Planning Commission a. Manager Evans presented the staff report with the recommendation to amend the Plan from RH, Residential High Density to Rm, Residential Medium Density for 2315 Stillwater Road north to and including the easterly 704 feet of 840 McKnight Road. b. Commissioner Prow presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Pellish moved that the Planning Commission recommend to deny the suggested change in the Plan from Rh, Residential High Density to SC, Service Commercial for properties addressed as 2315, 2321, 2327, and 2329 Stillwater Road. Commissioner Prew seconded. c. Mayor Greavu moved to Road north to and includi Ayes 7 Abstained 1 (Commissioner Fischer)" 7 the Plan Amei the Seconded by Councilman Nelson. from RE to RM for 2315 Stillwater Ayes - all. 2. Initiation of Street Vacation: Jessie Street - Forest Lawn Road a. Manager Evans stated Forest Lawn Memorial Park Association has requested Council to initiate a public hearing regarding vacating Jessie Street. They have been unable to obtain the necessary petition signatures. b. Mr. Dennis Prokop, representing Forest Lawn Memorial Park Association, spoke on behalf of the proposal. c. Mayor Greavu moved to set a hearing date of March 20, 1980 for the proposal to vacate Jessie Street from Ripley Street south to dead end. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. 3. Plan Review Appeal - Sherwin Williams - Beam Avenue a. Manager Evans stated Sherman Williams is appealing a condition that the Com- munity Design Review Board has placed on the approval of their Plan Review. The condition in question is: Applicant shall provide reciprocal easements, to be approved by the City Attorney, allowing for ingress and egress from the adjacent properties. - 16 - 2/7 b. Mr. Dennis D. Cavanaugh, C.G. Rein Company, spoke on behalf of the appeal. c. Councilman Bastian moved to refer this matter to the Planning Commission for review and report back to the Council within 30 days. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. 4. Lodging Ordinance Ayes - all. a. Manager Evans stated this proposed ordinance adopting the state lodging establishment regulations by reference was drafted as a part of the require- ments set forth in the Community Health Services Contract. This ordinance will give the City the authority to license and conduct routine inspections of all hotel, motel and other lodging establishments. There is a need to ensure that certain standards are maintained in all lodging establishments in order to pro- tect the health of the public. The annual license fee to be set forth in Section 266 and 288 would serve to com- pensate the City for time and expenses incurred during these routine inspections. The proposed annual license fees would be as follows: 1 - 15 Units 16 - 35 Units 36 - 100 Units 100+ Units ........ $ 20.00 ........ 40.00 ........ 60.00 ........ 80.00 These license fees will be comparable to the 1980 license fees charged by the State in their annual license. The Maplewood license, when issued, would replace the State licensing of these establishments. Currently there are only four establish- ments..that would apply. b. Councilman Anderson moved first reading of an ordinance giv authority to license and conduct routine inspections of all lod Seconded by Councilperson Juker. 5. Swimming Pool Ordinance Ayes - Councilman Anderson & Nelson, Councilperson Juker. Nays - Mayor Greavu, Councilman Bastian. a. Manager Evans stated this proposed ordinance adopting the State Swimming Pool Code by reference was drafted to fulfill a part of the requirements as set forth in the Community Health Services contract. This ordinance will give the City the authority to license and conduct routine inspections of all public and semi-public swimming pools. There is a need to ensure that strict safety and health standards are maintained in these pools so as to protect the public from injury and disease. The license fee to be set forth in Sections 266 and 288 would serve to compensate the City for time and expenses incurred in the periodic inspections. The proposed license fee would be $50.00 for all outdoor pools and $75.00 for indoor pools. Whereas the state does have a swimming pool ordinance, it does not license these pools, nor inspect them on a routine basis. This program would be new for the approximate thirteen public and semi-public pools in the City. - 17 - 2/7 b. Councilperson Juker moved to deny the proposed ordinance. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. 6. Pigeon Ordinance Ayes - Mayor Greavu; Councilman Anderson and Bastian and Councilperson Juker. Nays - Councilman Nelson. a. Manager Evans stated this proposed amendment to the nuisance ordinance concern- ing the keeping of pigeons was drafted due to a situation that has arisen in the McClelland area of the City. This department has received numerous complaints from neighbors of a resident who is keeping a large flock of pigeons in his garage. Their main complaint stems from the fact that he allows the birds to fly at large. As our current ordinance stands, we have no specific section that would prohibit this. Our Environmental Health Official feels that the keeping of pigeons does constitute a nuisance, and that we need an ordinance to regulate it, but not necess- arily prohibit it. b. Mr. Bob Woodbury, 348 E. County Road B, spoke in opposition to the proposed ordinance. c. Mr. G.O. Smith, 48 No. Ferndale Street, spoke in favor of the proposed ordin- ance. d. Councilman Bastian moved to deny the proposed ordinance regulating pigeons and requested that the residents, for or against a pigeon ordinance, meet with staff to prepare an ordinance. Seconded by Councilperson Joker. Ayes - all. 7. Feasibility Study - Gladstone Park Storm Sewer a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. Mayor Greavu moved to extend the agenda to past the deadline. Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu; Councilmen Anderson and Nelson, Councilperson Juker. Nays - Councilman Bastian. b. Councilman Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare preliminary plans for the improvement of the area lying generally south of Trunk Highway 36, east of Atlantic Street (extended), west of Hazelwood Avenue and north of Belmont Avenue (extended) by construction of storm sewers and appurtenances, and necessary street construction, and curbs and gutters (Public Improvement Project 79-8). WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid preliminary plans for the improvement herein described: - 18 - 2/7 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the City Engineer advising this Council that the proposed improvement of the area lying generally south of Trunk Highway 36, east of Atlantic Street (extended), west of Hazelwood Avenue and north of Belmont Avenue (extended) by construction of storm sewers and appurtenances and nec- essary street construction and curb and gutters is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to M.S.A. Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $602,000.00. 3. A public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1380 Frost Avenue on Thursday the 13th day of March, 1980, at 7:30 P.M. to consider said improvement. The notice for said public hearing shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF HEARING OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, deems it necessary and expedient that the improvement hereinafter described, be made; NOW, THEREFORE, notice is hereby given that the City Council will hold a public hearing on said improvement at the following time and place within the said City: Date and Time: March 13, 1980 at 7:30 P.M. Location: Council Chambers of the City Hall, 1380 Frost Avenue The general nature of the improvement is the construction of storm sewers and appurtenances and necessary, street construction and curbs and gutters (Public Improvement Project 79-8) in the following described area: The area lying generally south of Trunk Highway 36, east of Atlantic Street (extended), west of Hazelwood Avenue and north of Belmont Avenue (extended) The total estimated cost of said improvement is $602,000.00. It is proposed to assess every lot, piece or parcel of land benefited by said improvement whether abutting thereon or not, based upon benefits received without regard to cash valuation. Persons desiring to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement should be present at this hearing. - 19 - 2/7 This Council proposed to proceed under the authority granted by Chapter 429 M.S.A. Dated this 7th day of February, 1980. Seconded by Councilman Nelson. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk Ayes - all. C. Councilman Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 80-2-49 WHEREAS, the proposed public improvement of the area lying generally south of Trunk Highway 36, east of Atlantic Street (extended), west of Hazelwood Avenue and north of Belmont Avenue (extended), Maplewood Project No. 79-8, by construction of storm sewers and appurtenances and necessary street construction and curbs and gutters, does not have any impact on the City Comprehensive Master Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that under the provisions of M.S. Section 462.356, City Council hereby waives the review of aforementioned project by the City Planning Commission. Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all. 8. Policy on Hardship Cases - Park Fees a. Director of Community Services Blank presented the staff report. b. Councilman Bastian moved to refer the proposed policy on hardship cases to staff for further study. (Obtain the school district policy). Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 9. Computerization - Police Record System a. Manager Evans presented the staff report with the recommendation that the Council endorse the concept of an expanded computerized police record and manage- ment system as the development of the computer software has now been completed and there are sufficient monies available. Also, it is recommended that the Council authorize the following buget changes: the carry over from 1979 of $10,880 for implementation of the system and the appropriate transfer between accounts within the 1980 budget of the Police Department. b. Councilman Bastian voiced his concerns regarding the proposed program. c. Councilman Bastian moved to approve the concept of an expanded computeriz police record system, authorize the carry over from 1979 of unspent funds and authorize the appropriate budget transfers between accounts within the 1980 b of the Police Department. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. - 20 - 2/7 10. 1980 Park User's Fee Schedule a. Manager Evans stated each year a Fee Schedule for use of Maplewood park facilities is submitted to the Council for approval. This fee schedule establishes a uniform rental rate for the use of all park facilities, and authorizes the Commun- ity Services Department to reserve these facilities and be responsible for the collection of the rental charges. Fees are established giving the greatest benefits to the citizens of Maplewood. Rental charges are consistent with the approved 1979 schedule except for the light- ing charge at Wakefield and Goodrich Parks. We recommend raising the rate from the 1979 schedule - $10.00 per field per evening - to $10.00 per field per hour. We feel this increase is justified by the rising costs in utility rates; second, the addition of two new lighted fields at Goodrich Park; and third, additional maintenance and supervision costs. b. Councilman Bastian moved to adopt the 1980 Park User's Fee Schedule as recommended. Seconded by Councilperson Joker. Ayes - all. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. School Closing a. Councilperson Juker discussed the possibility of the Council asking the School District 622 Board to postpone closing the northerly schools. b. Mayor Greavu stated the Council never became involved in these proceedings. 2. Reconsideration a. Councilman Anderson moved reconsideration of the action taken by the Council the lot sDli SrrPPf_ Seconded by Mayor Greavu. b. Mayor Greavu moved to variance requested by Mr. 501 Farrell Ayes - Mayor Greavu; Councilman Anderson and Councilperson Juker. Nays - Councilmen Bastian and Nelson. date of March 6. 1980 Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilperson Joker, Councilmen Anderson & Nelson. Nays - Councilman Bastian. 3. White Bear Avenue - County Road B to Highway 36 a. Councilman Anderson questioned the progress of the alignment proposal for White Bear Avenue, County Road B to Highway 36. b. Staff stated they are in contact with Ramsey County regarding this matter. - 21 - 2/7 4. Maryland Avenue - Improvement 77-12 a. Mayor Greavu reviewed the costs of the Maryland Avenue (77-12) improvement. 6. Meeting on Thursdays a. Mayor Greavu stated he thought Council should meet every Thursday. b. No action taken. 7. Wage Negotiations a. Mayor Greavu questioned the status of the Clerical Technical wage negotiations. b. Manager Evans stated the union members would be voting on the proposal next week. 8. Staff Cars a. Mayor Greavu expressed his concerns regarding staff cars. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. C.C. Ludwig Award a. Manager Evans suggested Council nominate former Councilman Donald Wiegert for the C.C. Ludwig Award. b. Councilman Anderson moved to nominate Donald J. Wiegert for the C.C. Award. Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all. M. ADJOURNMENT 12:37 A.M. City Clerk - 22 - 2/7 01,14C 17 ` ' . x= � T. rY '8r nAPLENOOp ` � A C C O u N T S P A v A B 1. DATE 02 e1 PAGE 1 � � CHECK* A M O V N T _ C L 4 I N A N T ' - PURPOSE ! DEFEF, 'E CHANGE ANO EES FEES SER v ME Lo 0 &4 0.13 41162*64 MN MUTUAL LIFE I N.S GO A/R IN CONTINUANCE AND' DENTAL INS PAYA3LE': R AN AND-FA].'R SHARE FEES PAYA.B., A -FAIR SHARE FEES -PAYAB ND 01,14C 17 8,288*50 CITY �TY CREDIT uw3ow CREDIT uwZOw �EO PAYABLE / DEFEF, 'E ANO EES O14022 i400' 0 MINN STATE rREASSuRER DEPo3ITS~0EFuTY RsGI3T. J ` --'-----' / | ----�—� '-^--' -----------' ' ' . 0 .| ` t- TY OF MAPLE H000 A C C O U N T S P A Y A 9 L E DATE 02- -21 - 80 FAGS 2 CHEC k* A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E 00402 :. 219950 MINN STATE TP�EASSU =. :: 0E P.0S11S °DEPUTY : EGIS-T . 004026 MARIA MOS R R E F U N D - AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAMS 0rU4027 41 .29 IGOR FEDJ _ OTHER CONSTRUGlI COSTS .; .: DISEASED:. TREES (MLLEAGE) �. 002 :. 2.4.00. GARY JONES R - E F U N . : 0 .. .... _ SPECIAL 'EVEN TS.�� ___ 29 147 * 50 MINN STATE T :EASSUF:ER DEPOSI a S-DEPU T Y REGIST. 00�+C3G 25, 00 UNIVERS .TY O F. MINNESOTA OTHER C ONSTR UC TI O N CO STS DISEASED .TREES _ 004 =33.1 500�fl0 POST�ASTR PREP AILS EXPE ;� 23 43 , L1�+, 64 NECESSARY E XP,EN01 TURF S SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING 1y r t OF MA#�LEHOOD A C C 0 U N• T S --P A Y A D L E DATE 02-21-80 PAGE 3 Ll'Y C'HECK'S A- M O U N T G L A I M A. N T P U R P O S E 0 13 647 4 5� ACCURATE ELECT�cIC S UPP�»1 -ES EQU 0464 - . 19 0 12 ACE HARDWARE MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 0 . 04649 59 675 AD STA CORP - - S U PP LIES 9. , OFFICE 65o' 2 45fl. QG AMERICAN NATIONAL DANK DOND;�Ip D- .�?O NT �S T A _ _ �_- AND—OTHER CHARGES - _ 46 51 22 a 03 - - AME P.CAN TO SUP CO MA M ATERIAL S ND — S! ALL T00­S - r _ 65 .. 2,555 ARTS. T �EN ' EQ � I P ME NT 304653 26 *69 LUCILLE AURELIUS SUPPLIES, OFFICE A S _JA ~ SU -- ANO — PPI I ES t . VEHICLE _ t0 0; 4654 8- LAURIE DERGSTEDT TR AVEL + TRAINING �0 v46 4 99. 4 5 _BOARD O FF WATY F Comm __ Q=SIDE ENGINEERING ._.__. 4f�56 9u 42. ?0APr, OF NATE C0MM U I.LI "IBS 65 7 13 9 u ;U N' ENG N EE nI N TES 3I OUTSIDE ENGINEERING 1 . L 0?46 195_ 8 0_ 8ULLS_ 1E --- - -- SUPPLIE FL ANGE _ _ INC 04 4659 25.11 C PITGL SUPPLY C0 - m AI��iENANCE. S J46b�J - 126.75 CAPITOL ELECT TONICS iNC REP. + MA:INT o �^ RAC CQ4661 .2 7� 36 WILL CASS T R AV EL_t_ TR AINING_ _ G' 4662L 38 x 70 CASE FOWE E0U1 F4MEN T . y� SUPPLIES9 :-VEH CL 57 7 12 CEN U,'� C ~Ai' ERA ;� :LP a ;AINT� EQUIPM'EN T`�. AND—EQUI-PMENT, OTHER !V . Yf� TY OF MAPLE-WOOD A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A 9 L F DATE ,i2- 21 -- 8�3 PAGE 4 CHECK* A M O U N T C L A I M A N T U R P 0 S E - 004669 21* 4- 4 _ D A NI E L FAUST F ANOMSUPPLI ES, EQUIPMENT:. >.�.; _ 4042' 22 X 55`I ? r ^ E�1A :�RINGS CC ��_ FES 4. S .. - - _c 04664 65. DO FOREMAN CLARK WATER COOLER 004665 214&1.85 COLLINS ELECTRICAL CONS OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS } - ._.... CARPET CLEANING AN�O -R.E� s + MA i NT � , DL.DG +G3 32. E2 :. MAIt��3Et�ANCF MATERiA3 S PUBLIC WORKS BL DG.. 04f� 23O G ., SAT DALLY FEES , S'`RV ICE _ _ - - 1 7.50 REP + MAINT a , EQUIPMENT P _ &`S - WER..._.S_N.S�CZ'3I�NA -- 004667 -- BAFKRY EVANS TRAVEL + TRAINING 004 668 81,c0 F ADRA G RAPHICS SUPPLIES, PR OGRAM -- - REP.* .+ AI NT *,, VEHICLES - 004669 21* 4- 4 _ D A NI E L FAUST F TRAV - TRAINING _ 4042' h W G�A ING n� SUP ^r�.IwS EQUIPMEN�i 0$a4675 0^04670 65. DO FOREMAN CLARK UNIFO.:�MS CLOTHING C04�671 576.45 GEr I N G UST SUP PLY CO S UPPLIES, EQUIPMENT - ._.... CARPET CLEANING AN D- EQUIPMENTt ' OTHER 32. E2 G�cU3E 5 HA 0WARE HA�1K MAIt��3Et�ANCF MATERiA3 S AND °SUPPLIES, VEHICLE AND - AND .,MA. TOO;. S 004672 8.33 G ENUINE MARTS GO SUPPLIES-v VEHICLE -- - REP.* .+ AI NT *,, VEHICLES 0 GEORGES B-ODY SHOP 004 -- _ 4042' h W G�A ING n� SUP ^r�.IwS EQUIPMEN�i 0$a4675 332 .*70 GROSS INDUSTRIAL FEES SERVICE A ND °UNd + CLOTH CARPET CLEANING 0 +x;467 32. E2 G�cU3E 5 HA 0WARE HA�1K MAIt��3Et�ANCF MATERiA3 S AND - u 4677 :38 e 25 HALE COMPANY INC REP + MAINT a , EQUIPMENT -- T RE + MA.� . � VEHIC 0 ~ 3X54 HAr�,MON G1. A J x04 ?9 _ .._� _.. _ _ 2 7.5 . 0 HAWK P J ANITO R TOR C _ _ _ _.. _ _ -_ S U P P L I E S , � � JA NITO RI A L — 004680 131.99 HILLGREST GLASa GO MAIN TENANCE- M ATERIALS Y OF. VIAPLE�`WOOO A C. C 0 U ' N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 02-21-8D -PAGE 5 CHECK-* A M 0 U -N T. C L A 1 14 A N T P U R P 0 S E 0 t; 1. 32. 45 HO WIES OCK + KEY SERVIC F -r C 0- SUPPLIES I OF t A NO Mai 0 04682 300* 00 THE -IOENTI-KIT CO RENTAL EQUIPMENT 004683...... 13*38 1 N LU S T Rl(IA L, SU PPLY CO . INC' r SUP PLil' S J A N J. T OR T AL 0 L46.84 -'� 247 25 �IN'ER-CITY OIL C 0 HEATING oi Ht 004685 132e57 INTL BUS MACHINES CORP SUPPLIES, OFFICE 0 0 4 68 6 .. .5 0 Q . . INTL CGNF�--: OF e OG OFFI GI- - L .300KS P E X, IODICA S 004 30.00 i A C E I - SUBSCP -PTI ONS+ MEM RBERSHI P 5.4*00 U J TROPHYS S PORT S SU PROGRAM if."" C 4 6 8 9 150s00 LAKE SANITATI GN FE ES SE - . TRASH REMOVAL '3 C� 4 6 9.0 3E*93 -L EES AUTO SUPFLY SUPPLTES* VEHICL& _��__ 00 46 9 1 99.44 LUGER MERCANTILE CO MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00469� 2, G67 46C.- Al l I Q .CT " "R ME INSP1 VICE FEES 9 SERVICE ELECTRICAL -INSPECTIONS. ul-,04693 .3*70 M10WAY TRACTOR + E QUIL P. C SUPPL'IES, VEHICLc7, 0014694 3E*49 MN BLUEPRINT SUPPLIES, OFFICE Q *,l L� 6 111 39482*50-. WINFl[ELO A MITCH-EL' EGAL FISCAL' 0 X 4 696 . 626e65 MOTOR01 A INC I. L EQUIPMENT, OTHER 3 4697 '76 5 0 MUNICILITE CO_ _._ S _ U P PLZP- V E_ H I C LEE U046-98. 8 5 U 6.3 el U N I Cl F A 1, VTGE - FE E S S" E VICE ;I,< ANIMAL CONTROL 0046-90-0 104o00 T SOG OF OF ENGINEER NAI S C I PT I ON + ME M BER S HI P SUB*�) 004700 65.00 NORMS TI RE S A S-!-;::'S SUPD V -H-"CLE 0;0 868*47. -C 1'r T Y: O F IN 0 im" T H T -RAW: UT I L T I E`Z. F. 0 L47Q 131019 N0m_ T Ht-l"CIN BATTE--e'Y CORP SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT `g r4 r -'Ty OF VAPLEW000 A C C O U N T S .P A Y A 3 L E DAT 02-21•-80 PAGE 6 l CHEC K A N 0 U N T C L' A I N A N T U R P 0 S E 004703 <..: 1,740 ;`47 NORTHERIN STATES POWER. C0 `: UT.ILITI S 004704 926.69 NORTHERN STATE. POWER CO UTILITIES' - 004705 i, 166 NOR STAT POW C UTI LITIES 0047. .. 213.5.3. NO :STATES P0WER �Ca :.UT. I T S - 004707 4,619.33 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO — UTILITIES 004708 8784 77 NORT S TAT E S POWER C O f UTI LITIES 3,;47.09. 11,0 90 NORTHERN STA TES . �'OW -r CO UT fl04710 1 100.03 IAOi�THERN STATES POWER . GO UT ILITIES 00471 439 , 450 NOk"TH WEST ERN SELL TEL CO TELEPHO 00,4712 303,8G NORTH+�lESTERN ��L�. 3�L CO TEL ;PHONE 004713 440.97 NOKTHWESTE�N BELL TEL-CO _LE PH 0NtE 0 147 1 077 s 08 N 0RT N WEST E RN BE LL TE' C TEL E PH ONE u 4 7 15 619 e 38 N0 H�f�� ST ERN Et- LL TEL C0 TELE PH ONE _0 1 i6 l e 0`5 1�10F:Tt�WtSTEiCN ?E�,.L i E6. GO TE�.ErHONE 00471 2 79 42 LAVERNE NUT TRA T C04718 58098 OXFO RD CH S .I NC ChEMICALS. ` . _..__ 719 2 2.91 A O�F i L` S E R V I C� -- :P U L I S H IN G AND -FEE S 9 S RVICE FILM PROCESSING 0472 2, 07 ..00 PETE 50N9 BALL CONVERSE E S q SEQVICE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY: 0 472 1 RA CO TRE P O FFIC _ 00472 84.00 REED TIRE SALES ING ►�E��o �- MA v VE NiCLES CHECK* A M 0 U. N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S E 30,47 3 1 .. 5o44 STENCILS - MAPKiN PR00.. lami Ole 00 1 � �S;ERIII -1 EE F _ uC _' N T E �':A'`G E M ATE I AL TOLT K D V ALL A ND _ERS�_ E CONSULTIN FE C S � 0 � L � _�_ .... CHEMICAL TOILETS 0 c0 472 ? 361.14 J CHUS TER CO SUPPLI ES, 0FFI CE I : ?2 261.;'2 SC AR S OE BUCK 0 SMAI TGOLS _ 004 2.9 �. , 523.41 SHORT ALL T yO ' " - _ `_ .— QUTSILE ENGINEERING �. 004730 310 00 ST JCSEPHS HOSPITAL BOOKS + PERIOGIC,ALS 30,47 3 1 .. 5o44 STENCILS - MAPKiN PR00.. S IGNS * SIGNALS 0.04 3 2 10 9 4 66 STE SUP PL Y - �C . ER T _' N T E �':A'`G E M ATE I AL TOLT K D V ALL A ND _ERS�_ E CONSULTIN FE C S � 0 � L � _�_ .... 004733 17.39 VER'NON T STILL TRAVEL + TRAINING 0 310,80 TABULATING SEf \7 3URE ♦,U _. _ _ - - F•EES 9 SE VIC �F $0...._._. 0 47 3$ 92 * 7 DATA PROCESSING ' '?47 5 23x45 T STOR' _I N S UF?LI E S, OFFIC 00473E 13s00 THINGS RIM M3ERE0 SUPPLIE -S, PROGRAM. _...; 047 ~ � T t AINTE.NANCE �MATcRiA;..S 13 H TO i� . C Y� 00 473 $ 37465 TOLT K D V ALL A ND _ERS�_ E CONSULTIN FE C S � 0 � L � _�_ .... 0x47 39 6J.75 TWIN CITY JAIJI S UPP&..Y SUPPLIES, JANITORiA�. _ ..._ _' 740 _._.. T��:� I TY HARG ARE C0 .. ,SAS NTENANCE y A ' .S $0...._._. 0 47 3$ 92 * 7 - �'w N C ITY TESTING �. _ _ �__ -- OTHER, C 0 S ��R G T.'" 0 � C O ST S ......., _ _ _ MARYLAND, STERLING 9FERND:. 0 ;474 6�a2� �4 VIRTUE TUE .PRIi4TING C0 SUPt- iE OFFICE %4743 -� o0 0 VOIGTS MO FEES, SERV:iCF GALS GE TAWAY ' 004744 �4, $17 4� VU S GNS _ ST A NPIN GS SIG NS _-_S GNA ��__ 1 t ' 2 y TY OF MAPLEWOOD A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 02-21-80 PAGE 8 CHECK* A M 0 U N T C L A s M A N T P U R P 0 S rE - WAGES, TEMP. 0 04 . 75 + ND._MAIN'ENANCE`#RIA,S 7950 EARL B ER G LUND S ALAR I ES - WAGES, TE 0. - - -- 004746 .86 0 WEBER + TROSETH ING SUPPLIES VE'NICL 00 .4747 41 #54 WHITE $EAR DOC GE IN G R EPS + MAiNT�., VE.H WAGES, TEMP* . 0047 711.9 60 , 00. YO CUM O IL C0 INC FUEL. <. .CIS.:; ;30.-00 SUPPLIES, PROGRAM O04749 '' 75.38 ZAYRE SHO?PERS CITY 004757 1 9 50 CRA 9 RE�I.NE AND— SU PPLI ES , EOUI PMENT 004750 WAG TE 004751 SALARIES + WAGES, 'EMP. A . 61� 50 .. DAVID A N DERSON . _ 00 -475 t . `. - X LA.R( ^. S E +�..A E , T != M P 004752 132.00 ,JOSEPH BASTYR SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP, 004753 30 CO O-A-VID 3EALKE SA' ARIES - WAGES, TEMP. 0 04 . 75 + ; 7950 EARL B ER G LUND S ALAR I ES - WAGES, TE 004755 33.00 GREGORY BOTHW:ELL SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP* . ;30.-00 �.AP� Y BOTHW � SALARIES �- WAGES, TENP� 004757 1 9 50 CRA 9 RE�I.NE SA �- WAG TE 004751 59* 00 NANCY BURBACK SALARIES + WAGES, TEMPO QC475.9 b�SQ ,DAMES 6UCHER � "M SALARIES�+ WAGESg - E��iP. 0047 ; 30 o Q0O1GL ASEH SALA + t�JA TEMP 00 +761 - 13-o 00 THOMAS DEHMER SALARIES + WAGES9 TEMP ; t 4762 19 * 5D r , Ek0 1E t BLAO SA LARIES -. WAGE' � �T'7i 0047 %; 19 -*50 PA FA S ALARs ES - WAGES TEMP- t 00476.4 6050 TODD ,J SALA + 'W AGES, j T 004765 37.5 .:< ICNAEL. Ki�.EH .SALARIES +..WAGES - `E l , } 1 - t f 1 . ; ` ITY OF KAPLEWO00 A C C 0 U il T S R A Y A B L E DATE 02+21 °80 PAGE 9 CHEC A M 0 U N T C L A I M A N T P. U R P 0 S E 0476b : 3i�.0 THEOCOF:E LEGMAN <. SALARIES SAGES, TEp. 004i67 '' 26.0D JAMES MAG ILL SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP o -_0 '' 3 5.00 T IMO TH Y MAGILL SALA # WA ,mp ?047G� 52, 0i GENE MATHISEN SALARIES - W,�GES TEPa 004770 :; 45.0 0 ROBERT MI NC HER SALARIES - WAGES, TEMP, 004 771 " 48.00 MAR GAKET MONETTE S AL RTES fr t AGES �9 TE M P T x:047`7.2 x.55. 75 _ WILLIAM MONET3E SALARIES > � . . ��AGES, - �._���,� . 00+773 " 136450 BRUCE OAKES SALARIES + WAGES•, TEMP. s 00477 " 7.5 WI LLIAM P A'�NE SALARI WAGES, TE 0034775 '' 123e 00 NA A PERSON SALARIES + 'WAGES, TEi�r� OG477E 20.00 GLORIA PET:ERSC SALARIES + WAGES, TE MP. 0 , 0 4777 " � 81.2 JA MES OUICKSTAG S ALARIES WAGES T MP 004.77 8 196*62 ALEERT RASCHKE ' SALARIES WAGES, TEMp� ....._ 0. � 0 4 7.7 � r 13 3 . 0 0 � S � O �� T K • Q C C 0 SALARIES + WAGE 0 0" 4780 'c 2.6 s 00 PA TR IC K RU S ALA RI ES + WAGES TE MP. - Ov 47 1.:. " 15 . fl0 :: P H I LIP Rt1NNING SALA RIES WAGES, . 'E# '.o 004782 19.50 KOBERT cUNN_ING SALARIES t WAGES, TEMP 0 . 04783 `` 6.50 VINC RUNNI SAL ARIES + WAGE 4 TEMP. 004784 .c 163 50 BERNARD SCHULTE ` SALARIES + WAG ES,' TE '1�° 004785 " 333e12 ROBERT SCHWINTEK SALARIE S + WAGES, iE T . 0104 117.00 .JEFFR S s M0NSCN SA + WAGES, TEMP '0 0478? .., G. 50 . BRUCE STRANOSKO�1 S1��. ARI�S �- �; AGES, �'E�9� A•. FIGURE SKATING L 04789' _ __.... 1 a 0 .0 LINDA BERGAN R E F U N D KICKS GAME: CC4795 8 CA =.OLYN OI tl.O NJ tR E F U N 0 ICKS GAME 0:0 796 A ITY OF MAPLEW - 000. E F U t-.4 D A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A 3 L E r DATE 02- 21-80 PAGE 1 -. CHECKS` A M .0 - U N T C L A I M A N -A P U R P O S E f rC479 73.27 81L�.-A -.:PAK CO LIES 0 -- uu4791 - .180 00 GLORIA BtROWN E F U N 0 COOL KIDS CAPER 0 4798 KICKS GAME 0 04792 1 * 0G. MONICA C R E F U N D - _ FIGURE ATING . 0047.93 8.5 P U RU38ER -S *TAMPS 5 3 -P .DES, OFF J. C P J __._.. 047 ~ 3.80 ROGER DELFIACCO T �AV L + TKA"ANING CC4795 8 CA =.OLYN OI tl.O NJ tR E F U N 0 ICKS GAME 0:0 796 .9* 25 MRS FLETCHER E F U t-.4 D COOL KIDS CAPER' 0 04797 3. 0 0 CAROL F0 S:EY R E F U N D COOL KIDS CAPER 0 4798 9..20 �- ATRICIA G.ILBERTSON FEES � SERVIC -- r � MRS H HAN NIGAN : R E F U N D J AFTER S P 004800 80 00 -_ MRS R L JOHNSON R F U N 0 _ Y AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAMS C 0480 8 00 KA REN LARSON R E F U N D Q?04802 20 00 MRS MICHAEL LGBINSKY R E F U N 0 M_- F IGU RE .SKATING - .- E 0 .._._. 8 * 0 0 �.:� _ G `� C u 0 N;A " D .� F U ._N-- D R AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAMS C 04804 16.0" GRACE M �CKELL E PF. R E F U. N 0 0C48D5 10.00 AD�IE ��E`°�ZTZ P, E F U N D FIGUR SKATIN . 10-:0 0 0 J A N E T N TS w K A R --- -- F U _ N �.., C .�..�.. ___. _ AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAMS 0048 3* 5C H AR RY .F R E F U N D -- _ COGS 71 S CAPES 0,4 8 0 8.4 16a 00 THEODORE PETERSON R E F U N D GYMNAS _ .. ;rk C 4 8 0 9 _- ^11 � 0 C _ GL OrR I A Q U AST ` .._� . F _....- U N 0 ____.____ _...�__. FIGURE SKATING 004810 10 o MRS G SCHNL1 P E F U N 0 - - — w. AFTER9CH0'OE:PROGRAMS 0;r:�8.11 x.24 Cw : 'KATHY SSA L.. E F -U N D • ..� . KICKS G AME. �. . .._.....__ �. - ..19 :0 4 81 Id �- -- 10 L 0 c U�T N S T A V S V r C K ...�__ R ....� E _.. U _ N D_. AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAMS 00' 481? 8a 06 MRS J AMES T ULGREN �? E F U N 0 - -' -- -FTE --ro o L R t 1'. i . j r � �a T Y OF MAPL �►00D - A C C 0 .T S P A Y A B L E DATE 02-21-80 PAGE 11 CHECK A M O U N T C L A I M A N T i P U R P 0 S 004814 00 # RO BERTA WE1HRAUCN w. 47 F U N D _. A S P 004815 10.00 ...-F-A TRIClA WERDEN R E F U N 0 FIGURE SKATING •_.0 60 Oii AM F LAG ? E FLA.G C O REP. MA NT H_ . BLCG +GRO.S 0 0 +8 7....` . 8m 0 JANIC�E +CARLS E F -u MBLING _..._._. 82 00 CONSOLIOAT 0 ELECTRIC MAI NTENANCE MATE -RIALS 004 819 1.94, FI� PR O D UCTS CO _ EQUIPM NT, OFFICE _ 0is820 13.7.25 GREEN AGRE`S FEES q SERVICE - COOL KID CAPE ! 004821 46.50 IDS EXHI3IT +OESER11 DESK FEES, SERVICE COOL KIDS ACPER 0PJ4822 51 *53 J F IRE PROTECTI REP, MATNTo v EQUIPMEN 0 04 823 57 MARILYN A J0H N". ON R E F U N D COOL KI CAP 0 % �+ 82 �+ t�.i+� ,�OS£PM 1.AC?0i ~ X F — U N 0�� AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAMS 004 6 * 2 MR S TIMO MOY R E F U N 0 _ {�L_ D S — CAPER - 00 4 82E 23s.OQ •9i� LANs �- SURVEYOR ASSOC BOOKS PEM:�00'sCA S t]0'�827 SJ� C0 F�iOTQGRAPHY DISP�.AY LABS NSTRUC�'IOh�COSTS BEAM AVE. _ OC 8 1. 0. 0 0 MRS D SM R E U N 0 ._. - ---- -- -- -- _ ---- A CHU O1 F RU G RARS OL4829 20 e QG EU� STOTTLEIEYER E F U N D _ - G ALS GETAWA _ 0 0 D A R R Y L T N A Y ;. tZ F E r S 4S E R v i C E NATURE CENTER SPEAKER .184 82 CHE�CK_ ;�t i 'a E TOT CF 207 CHECKS TOTAL 125947 6 INDICATES ITEM P FOR BY RECREATION FEE n ''Ea Tt t i CITY OF M- A i p _,.. CHECK REGISTER PAYROLL CATER 02r- 15±-80 OATS 02-15-80 4 = CHECK NO* CLAIMANT GROSS NET 23 35 BARRY . R EVANS 1. 423, O8 835930 .� 23360 V IVIAN R- LEWIS - 62.5481 4194 23361 LAURIE L BERGSTECT 4.56903 307481 23362 ROGER P DEL.F I ACCO 143420 131 ®35 23363 DANIEL lF FAUST 1 1 222.o89 79552 23364 ARLI J HAGEN 751438 343447 23365 AELANA K MATHEYS 456000 302408 23366 LUCILLE F AURELIUS 1, 142,400 635427 23367 PHYLL.I S C GREEN 538 o 62 . 363e84 23368 BETTY D SEI.VCG 538m62 350484 23369 LORRA I N S .V I ETOR 400. 15 -249 * 9 8 - 23370 JEANNE L SCHACT 267e75. 214.61 23371 ALFRED J PEL GOUIN 555417 38475 23372 JADES G KLEIN 155438 153914 - 23373 TE C R ILEY 156.13 144919 23374 CAVID L ARNOLD 9,66846 310097 23375 JOHN H ATCHISON 8484 514°98 ANTHONY G CAS {A . 96969 541.94 _ 23377 CALE K CLAUSGN . 848431 65*96 23378 KENNETH V COLLINS 1, 010.17 184.03 2 DENN i S J DELP eNT 1,126923 157.35 23380 RICHARD C DREGER 967* 85 549.05 23381 RAYHONO E FERNC 622931 192.44 - 23382 NORMAN L GREEN 986077 437.09 -. 23383 s KEVIN R HALWEG 8 4 8 .� 31 4634 4 5 :.� 233 MICHAEL J 832,615 489*6 23385 CGN:ALD V KORTUS 1,69 460 133 s T8 233.86 RICHARD J LA 871 e 38 502477 23387 JOH: N J MC NUL TY 986 0 31 538 x 57 23388 JAPES E . MEEHAN JR 818* 12 1 180441. 23389 CAMEL 8 METTLER� 807069 536069 23390 � RICHARD � MOESCH T ER 848a 31 539491 • `� 23391 RAYMOND J MORELLI 808 ®23 551950 23392 ROBERT 0 NELSON 1, 047*90 6784 15 23393 t+ I LL I AM F PELT IER 949,o85 523457 .23394 R iCHARC W SCHALLER 1 303a8i 801433 23395 DONALD W SKALVAN 848431 416Q79 23396 GREGORY L STAFNE 848031 528..80 23397 VEkNCN T STILL 807.469 486.o64 23398 CARRELL T STCCXTCN 807.969 541.6 4 2 T IVIOTHY. J TRUHLER 889o35 456o 23400 8RU("o'E W W.E0ER 733985 475485 23 401 OUANE J WILLIAPS 864e46 9 2 .402 JCSEPH .A ZAPPA 988�►15 65 �. r.. A4 0 3 DEBORAH A BASTYR 372492 200496 ` 23404 J AY NE L FLAUGHER 502962 335 s 60 23405 GECRGE W VULWEE. 424062 268.45 23406 KAREN A NELSON ...424.a6?- 279443 ,2340 7 JOY E 0MATH 409 a 85 279,443 .. _ 23408 JOANNE M SVENOSEN 530 Q 88 351.48 23409 VICHELE A TUCHNER 424x62 241.448 23410 RONALD D BECKER 936.90 275o w 23411 CENN[S► S CUSICK 192.76 ®23 795916 2341-2 CAVIL M GR AF 8 7 4 4 2 3 4 2 23413 CYNTHIA J MORGAN 37.2.92 258.23. • 23414 ROGER W LEE 191.43969 70 8 .82 olu 23415 JON A PELANDER 846,992 28496 23416 CAROL V NELSON 872051 538.52 23417 CALE E RAZSK AZ-CFF .887o54 1824 31 23418 VICHAEL P RYAN 871438 434*46 23419 ROBERT E VOR -WERK 887954 .15525 23420 JAMES G YCUNGREN 85.1 557o85 23421 � JAMES N EMBER TSON 468 o 87 23422 ALFRED C SCHACT . 710a77 95.3.54 .592483 23423 CLIFFORD J 'CTTAZ 64 6 1 58 14 + _ 23424 MARCELLA M. PGT^fAZ 53$962 355.78 .. 23 - 425 ti �I LL I AM L 131 TTNER 1 2644 2.3 792.77 23426 JAI-'!ES G EL I AS 728-977 407.a4l s ... 23427 LEOTA D GSALQ 322,70 23428 CENNIS L PECK . 512o77 72847? 4.13 ®73 23429 PAUL. B WEBBER 826* 19 545042 23430 JUDITH A W EGWERTH 171 b 60 144.46 :r S J CI TY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER PAYROLL GATED 02- -15-80 DATE 02- 15 CHECK NO* CLAIMANT GROSS NET 23431 IGOR V FEJDA 621 e 69 422 e80 rµ. 23432 1%ALTER M GEI SSLER 728° 77 474.55 23433 JAMES T GESSELE 621469 418.92 23434 KE NETH G HaA10ER 958°62 166,40 ,... 23435 1; I LLIAM C. CASS 978-o46 50.3 43 .. 23436 RONALD L .FREBERG 611,s 71 393,44 23437. RONALD. J •H.ELEY 666 ,949 424. J'2 23438 RAYMOND J KAECER 674897 435*04 23439 1 1 CHAS L R- KANE 666449 28129 23'440 GERALD W MEYER 68.0099 339,59 23441 ARNOLD H PFARR 689o28* 448,22 - 23442 JOSEPH 6 PRETTNER 963013 647o54 2344.3 EDWARD A RE INERT 660847 421 *29 23.444 GEORGE J RICHARD 660*47 41114 23445 HARRY J TEVL JR 698. 51370 23446 G I LBERT C LAROCHE 488 7 ./ Q 327.*16 23447 V PAUL I N . AD A S 9,s' 675 433 ?i 4. - 23448 RUDOLPH R 8 893854 53,5897 23449 ERIC J BLANK 1;p 252 ,s 81. 706*89 23450 LOIS J BR ENNER 502,62 162o91 . 23451 BARBARA A KRUMPEL 200.00 114x P 23452 ROY G VIARD 277,65 217*23 23453 PYLES R BURKE 642.40 367 °2.1 - 23454 CAVID A GERVAIN. 642b4O 40843 23455 VELVIN J GUS INCA ' 920000 53342 23456 ROLAND 8 HELEY 642° 4O 427s06 23457 HENRY F. KL.AU 642*40 36 *19 23458 REED E SANTA 692, 46 a' 23459 �ILLIAMt KIRK 300 / 4 24 ■ 83 23460 DENN MCAULAY 300 ,o00 25381 23461 JOSE-PH P PLANTE 45.76 45876 23462 KONRAD SCHMI CT 300oOO 25381 23463 B ARIBARA J BRUNELL 94 ,938 82.27 23464 ,JANET M GREYS 117,00 100082 23465 JAMES R MCKEE 519 a 20 361o93 23466 CHRISTINE SOUTTER 519 a 20 350* 07 r_ 2346E JUD i V CHLEBELK ' 12 * 7 7 2 J 23468 THOMAS G EKSTRANC 596s15 38334 23469 RANDALL L JOH NSON 5868 391093 23470 NANCY J M ISKELL 171,860 131 -e 01 �. 23.471 CEO REY W OLSCN 1 72.1045 23472 LEWIS G I.ILLE R 81410 52999 23473 PARJORIE OSTROM 847 *85 549,962 23474 ROBERT J WENGER 761 * 95 507o0l 24.75 RICHARD J BARTHOLOMEW 666x 67 358 ,s54 2 3476 DAVID .B EDSON 602,z 49 375„16 2.3477 EDWARD. A NACEAU 752.5 6 504 o 83 23478 LAVERNE S NUTESON 396052 2.3479 GERALD C OMEN 654x40 394443 2.3480 WILL S THCNE 654 ®40 465 891 23481 JOHN E MAC DONA LD 708.80 . 469 a 62 „ 23482 OENNIS M MULVANEY 691x22 429„00 CHECK NUMBER 2335 23482 86 9 4340 5l 489 775 ®2Q PAYROLL DATED 02-15-80 23483 THOMAS L HAGEN 1,204.31 165.93. Cz 23484 RAYMOND E FERNOW 226.00 206.92 "� -f-TOTALS'"' 87 49,148.05 4 r , MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Communi Development SUBJECT: Outl of Definition DATE: January .30, 1980 r co gave first ,reading to this Ordinance on January 17 and referred it to the City Attorney for review. A copy of the revised Ordinance, including the Attorney's recommendations, is enclosed. Recommendation Approval of the Ordinance-as enclosed, Tyr b t a� _ ( j ..4. spy. Aoq h � r •' L J. J. J_1 V v W J. V � mt- J_J W 1. �. t t J.� \,..L 1 1 4.I'V 1."." .0 L.CJ VV V V 1J. U V. 0 - ' 1 V 1 1. 1t ►:7 Z V JU .0 V YY a : Section 1. Section 1005 of the , Code is hereby amended by add ing thereto Section 1005 030 and shall read as. follows: .1005.030 OUTLOT CONDITIONS. (a).. No buldi:ng permit will be: issued for construction Upon any lot designated as an outlot upon any plat except by special use permit. (b) The Council of the City of Maplewood: will not grant a special use permit for building upon any out: _ot unless :said outlot meeets the following conditions (1) It meets the size . and frontage requirements provided for in this code (2) It is ready for development and has the requisite public improvements. t3) The. perm density under the City Code has not been transferred to .another parcel and is, therefore, sufficient to accommodate the proposed construction (4) That the outlot is. not used for permanent ' common open space. • (5) That the proposed construction can overcome or accommodate topographical problems and /or peculiar - site characteristics`. Section- 2 This Ordinance shall take effect . and be in force from and after passage and publication. Passed by the Council of the City of Maplewood this day of 1980, ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF OUTLOT IN SECTION 1002.014 of the-ma plewood code THE C.OUNC IL OF THE CITY OF : MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS Section 1. The definition of "OUT -LOTS " i .Section 1003.010 of the Maplewood Code is hereby, amended as follows: OUTLOT is any parcel of land designated as an outlot. on any plat in the City Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in farce from and after passage and publication Passed by the-Council of the City of Maplewood this . day of 1980.. Mayor ATTEST City Clerk . 1 February 5, 1980 STAFF REPORT To: City Manager Barry Evans From: Director of Public Safety R. W. Schaller Subject: 120 -Hour Training Course I have conferred with Fire Marshal Schadt concerning the 120 - hour State Fire Marshal Inspection Enforcement Training Course that will be offered at no expense to the City other than personal - time from. employment in City duties. We both feel this is an excellent opportunity to upgrade our _present Fire Code implementation and inspection procedures. You will note a contract between the State of Minnesota and the City of Maplewood whereby the C m ity agrees.. to perform' all or part of the inspection duties set forth _n .Minnesota Statute 299F.'46, 'Subdivision 1 (1978) . To. receive this 1420 - hour training course, the contract must be signed by the proper State agency or department and returned for processing by the State Fire Marshal's Division before confirmation of participants can be achieved. At.this time, Deputy Fire Marshal Embertson is being considered as a class participant. Attached for your information .is correspondence received by Fire Marshal Schadt, Contractual Service Agreement, course agenda for this class, and a City training application. e Your prompt , reviewal and decision . concerning the above will be very much appreciated. RWS :js cc Fire File Fire Marsha) Act' o 1dy 0,;:l 1. ; noctt_r� DIVISION OF STATE FIRE MARSHAL 1246. UNIVERSITY (AVENUE ST.. MINNESOTA 55104 TELEPHONE: 1612) 206 -7641 February .4 , 1980 �`� O 06 \ 1 P STAN ' OF - MINNFSC.TA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY -Mr. Al Schadt, Fire. Marshal City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 Re:. 120 hour Fire Marshal Division Inspection Enforcement Training Course Dear Al As requested i n our recent phone conversati , and 1 etter, enclosed for your review is a copy of the,contractual agreement required for a hotel /motel /resort inspection agreement as wel'l' as a copy of the previous . cl ass course outline. We have included Mr.. James Embertson' s name as a potential parti c i pa•nt in the 120 hour training course to be conducted May 5 through May 23, 1980. The agenda and other pertinent information will be mailed under separate cover once it is confirmed as well as Mr. Ember tson' s final confirmation to be a participant. We request processing of the contract be started as soon as practicable. Please leave copies together and mail back to this offi ce. A fully s i fined and executed. copy w i l l be forwarded to you after our appropri ate processing. Class size wi ll be limited-so we suggest prompt revi ewal and conf i rmati for participation in this course Should you have any further questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to ,contact me directly. Sincerely, Wes Kerner State Fire Marshal WW: j h encl osures } Sta.te of Minnesota e CONTRACTUAL (non -- state employee.) Services THIS CONTRACT, which shall be interpreted pursuant to -.the :laws of the State of Minnesota, between " the State of Minnesota, acting through its Department - of: Public Safety (herein- after- STATE) and -- - - - -__ - - address Soc. Sec. or Fed. Iden. - eretnafter CONTRACTOR), witnesseth' that: WHEREAS, the STATE, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1978, Section 299F.46, subdivision 2, is empowered to enter into an agreement wi th any county, 2 or mare contiguous counties or ci ty or other muni ci pal i ty., and WHEREAS, under 'Which agreement the. county (i es) , city or munic'i pad i ty may agree to perform all or part of the J pspecti on .duties set forth in Minnesota Statute § 299F.46, subdivision l (1978), and WHEREAS, CONTRACTOR represents that it is duly qualified and willing to perform the servi Ce,s set forth herein, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed 1. CONTRACTOR'S DUTIES I. Annual i nspect every hotel within its j ur. sdi ct on and enforce the prov.i si ons of : the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code as it applies to those facilities at no cost to the State-. 2. Require all inspectors employed for the purposes of this contract to successfull complete the State. Fire Marsha ' s Enforcement Inspection Training program to be provided to the munici. no cost. 3. Adopt ordi nances establ ng fi sa fety standards at least equiva- lent to the n1inimum standards established by. M.S. 299F.011 and the. rules promulgated thereunder, as such statutes and rules are amended from time to time The consultant may enact ordinances with.more stringent requirements. 4. Attach to. the contract a certified copy of the municipality's fire ordinance and Council resolution to enter into an agreement. • II. CONSIDERATION AND TERMS'OF PAYMENT, A. Consideration for all services performed and .goods or materi a1s suppl i ed y CON RACTOR pursuant to this contract shall paid by the STATE as follows; Reimbursement for travel and subsistance expenses incurred by the contractor at the following rates: Travel. at 19� per mile; lodging at $34.00 per night; and meals at $14.00 per day during the three -week training period beginning . and ending The state - will - reimburse the contractor for the expenses of'not more than student(s). - Total reimbursement not .to exceed$ ,000.00 (One Thousand Dollars) per student, or $ ). total, T is contract may be to.allow reimbursement for training of additional.. students subject to tfie availability of .funds. 1 . B• Terms of Payment 1. Paym,ents% shal 1 be rude. by the STATE rom tly after. P P CONTRACTORS presentation of cl aims for reimbursement of expenses.and acceptance of such claims by. the STATE'S authorized agent pursuant to Clause :VI: _ Claims. shall be submitted in a form prescri bed , by the STATE and according to. the following schedule: Upon completion III. CONDITIONS OF PAYMENT. All services provided by CONTRACTOR pursuant to ihis contract shall be performed to.. the satisfaction of the STATE, as determined in the sole discretion of its authorized a ent, and in accord wi th all applicable federal state and local laws , ordl nances , rules, and regulations. IV. TERM OF CONTRACT. This contract shall be effective on or upon such date -. as it i.s executed as to encumbrance by the Comm! ssi over of Finance , ..whichever occurs later, and shall remain in effect until or unt.i 1 all obligations set forth in this contract have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first. V. CANCELLATION This contract ma be cancelled b the STAT Y y STATE .'or CONTRACTOR at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. In the event of such a cancellation CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to payment,.determined on a pro rata basis, for work or services satisfactorily performed. VI C S TATE.' S AUTHORIZE AGENT, The. STATE'S authorized agent for the r g purposes of . admini strati on of this contract is Department of Pub is Safety. Such agent shall have ,.. fl nal .authority for acceptance of CONTRACTOR'S services and if such sery res .are accepted as satisfactory, shall so certify on.- each invoice submi tied .pursuant to Clause II.-paragraph B. VII. ASSIGNMENT. CONTRACTOR shall neither assi n nor transfer an rights g y g or o igations under this contract.without the prior.written consent of the STATE. VIII. ' AMENDMENTS . Any amendments to this contract. shall be in writing. IX. OTHER - PROVISIO.NS I. The State will discontinue .ins ecti on and enfo.rc.ement .actions in those f a c i l i t i e s covered ' by the Agreement. The State-will. :provide, without cost to the Contractor; training a.nd con- sultation on problems. The State will provide without cost to the Contractor, consultation., and advice on rules romul aced by the State which are enforced.by the. Contractor. P g 2. The State will annually review the Con tractor's ro ram to P 9 determi nE- its continued compliance with the Agreement, Annual v r review criteria include code interpretation, enforcement ro-- p cedures, inspection results a . nd frequency, records complete -- tress and staff traidhq 3. The Agreement shall. cone nue to -:be ..'effective- until .terminated by either party in accordance with Section V. If the Contractor's program is found by the State tolbe deficient,'but under conditions that do.:not endanger the fire safety of the commu n it the State may contl nue the Agreement on a provisional. status for a specific time period. 4.. The Agreement may be amended with the. mutual consent of both parties. .50 ..No Agreement shat 1 be effective to transfer an tort liability 1 i t y y attr butabl e to any inspection or lack of inspection from the State to the local unit contracting to perform the inspection. In WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties.have caused.this contract to be duly executed intendin g to bes.bound thereby. APPROVED: As to and execution b the y 1.. CONTRACTOR: (Ifa corporation, two corporate officers must execute.) By Title: Date: By: Title - Date 2. STATE AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT: By • Title: Date: 30 A"TORNEY GENERAL: By • - - - Date: COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION: 4* By* Authorized Signature Date: 5. COMMISSIONER OF FINANCE: ENCUMBERED DEPARTMENT Of By: Date: White - Original - Finance Dept. Canary CONTRACTOR Blue - Agency Acctg. Unit Salmon - DEPT. OF ADMIN., Pink - Agency Suspense Copy Green - Mork Copy a:.':. 4 41 - Week One _ June 4 June 8 Time Su Instructor . First Da (Monday', June 4) 0830 -- 0845 Introduction to Course W. Werner 1015 Fire Marshal Inspections, Basic Concepts W. Collins 1015 - Break - 1030 - 1200 Inspection Relationships with other Agencies W. Collins 1200 - 1300 Lunch 1300 - 1500 Minnesota Statutes and the Fire Marshal W. Werner Division W. Collins 1500 - 1515 Break 1515 - 1630 Continuation. of Minnesota Statutes W. Werner information W. Collins Second D (Tuesday, June 5) 0830 -- 1000 Attorney General Staff: Tort Liability' Jane Prohaska 1000 -- 1015 Break . 1015 - 120.0 Attorney General Staff, Inspection Procedures Jane Prohaska 1200 1300 Lunch 1300 1500 Inspection Procedures W. Collins 1500 - 1515 Break 1.515 - 1630 IFSTA .Book W. Collins Third Da . . - - (Wednesday, June 6) 0830 - 1000 N.F. P.A. #101p Chapter 1 -7 Administra- tion and Fundamental P. Williams Week. One ' (Continued) u " "'. ` June '8 Time Subje r Instructor Third.Da tinued) (Wednes June 6}. (Con ' = 1000-- 1015 Break 10:15 - 1200 N. #101, Chapter 8, Assembli P. Williams 1200 - 1300 Lunch 1300 - 1500. N. #101, Chapter 10-- 12- 13p14- 15' 16 -17 P. Wi lliams _ 1500 - 1515 Break 1515 - 1 N.F.P.A. #101, Chapter 10-12-13-14- - 15 -16 -17 P. Wi lliams. , Fourth Da (Thursday June 7 ) 0830 - 1000 Sta Building Code Division. Dick.. Brooks Overview of Uniform Building Code and Assis Director our Enf orcement Requir Sivert Hendrickson Section Chief 1000 a 1015 Break. 1015 1200 Continuation, Uniform Building Code Dick Brooks. Sivert Hendrickson 1200 -- 1300 Lunch 1300 - 1500 Continuat Uniform Building Code Dick Brooks Sivert Hendricks f _ 1500 1515 Break 1515 -.1630 Continuation, Uniform Building Code Dick Brooks Sivert Hendrickson Fifth Da (Friday, June 8 ) 0830 � 1000 State Building Code Division Uniform Building Code Chapters 33 -38 Sivert Hendrickson 1000 - 1015 Break 1015. 1200 Conclusion Uniform Building Code Sivert. Hendrickson 0 5 � g 1200 Students Released for Travel. to Home Stations.. " Overs a w Week Two - Collins June ,11 -% June 15 Time R. Sub j e c 1, - First': Da (Monday, June . 11) 0830 - 1000 Life Safety Code, Chapter 9 Educational.Facilities, Including: Daycare; Code Advisory. Panel:, etc. 1000..- 1015. Break. 1015 - 1200 Life Saf ety Code, 11 Hotel/Motel/Resort/Lodging - 1200 - 1300 Lunch - 1300 - 1.500 Uniform Fire Code, 1973 edition General. Provisions- (Amendments, - Adoption. -- Implementation) 1500 -- 1515 Break - 1515- 1630 Uniform Fire Code,. 1973 edit. Articles Y'f 2*through X12 Second Da (Tuesday, 12) 08.30 - 1000 Uniform Fire Code (1973) Articles . #13 through #25 1000 -- 1015 Break 1015 - 1200 Uniform Fire Code (1973) Articles #26 through #36 1200 - 1300 Lunch... r- 1300 -- 1500 N. F . P .A. 10 volumes 1500 - 1515 Break - 1515 - 1630 N.F.P.A. 1.0 Volumes Third Da . (We dne s day , June 13 ) 0830 - 1000 Examination #1 (All Students) 1000 - 1015 Break 1015 - 1200 Hotel /Motel /Resort Inspections Instructor W. Collins. R.• Sockness R.. Imhol.te W. Collins R. Sockness R. Imho lte R. Sockness. R. Sockness R. Sockness R. Sockness R. Sockness R. Sockness W. Collins W Collins R. Sockness Week Two (Continu r June 1 June 15 Time Sub ject Ins true for Thir d D (Continued) (Wednesday, June 13 ) 1200.- 1300 Lunch 1300 - 1500 Slide Presentation, Violations- Found at W. Collins Hotels/Motels. R. Imholte 1500 - 1515 Break 1 - 1630 Restaurant Inspections J. Hanly - Fourth D (Thursday, June 14) - 0 830 1000 Order Writing 'Procedures R. Imholte 1000 - 1015 Break 1015 - 1200 Order Writing Procedures R. Imholte 1200 - 13 00 Lunch 1300 - 1500 Fire Department Inspections R. Sockness Dilapidated Buildings Program W. Collins - . Liquor Control Team Inspections (Assemblies) 1500 - 1515. Break 1515 - 1630 Policies- and Procedures, Fire Marshal W. Collins Division Fi f th Da (Friday, ..June 15 ) 0830 - 1000 Health Department Regulations Affecting Fred Mit chell Fire Marshal Inspections Relative to Section Chief Hotels / Motels /Resorts Hotel Inspection William. Miller 1000 - 1.015 Break Attorney General. Office 1015 -- .1200 Continuation of Health Department Fred Mitchell Presentation William Miller 1200 Students Released for Travel to Home Stations Week-Three J�xne 18 - June 22 First D (Monday, June 18 ) 0830 - 1000 Introduction to N,'F.P.A. #30, W. Collins Flaiaamaable Liquids L. Kirstein over i. Gi. r 4 ✓ V ./ • o V Week. Three (continued) June June 22 Time sub . ect Instructor • First. Da ..(Continued) (Monday, June 18 ) NF,PA.Fir.e-Hazard Properties of Flammable/ Combustible Liquids. Slides Presentation Willernie Service Leak Slides' Presentation 7.11 Tanks Slides and Discussion Litchfield oil Dumping Bulk Plant (Re Claimed Depot) Slices and Discussion Litchfield Bulk Plant Slides and.Discussion , Aboveground.* Gasoline. Storage and Regulations Slides and Discussion Alexandria Bulk Farm Lightning Strike Slides Presentation. Horizontal Tanks and Loading. Racks NFPA : Slides Presentation Transperencies of NFPA #30 Basic Requirements Question and Answer Session. 1000 - 1015 Break 1.015 1200 Continuation, N.F.P.A, #30 W. Collins L. Kirstein 1200 1300 Lunch 1300 1500 Introduction to N.F.P.A. #58, W. Collins L : P . Gases W. Werner NFPA Film, ' `B l eve" (19 minutes)., Discussion on Bleve s (Handouts and Transperencies ) LP Gas Explosion, Kingman, Arizona NFPA Slides -over- i Week Three (Continued) J�urie .18 -- June - 2 2 _ Time Subject Ins truc for First Dad (Continued) (Monday, June 18) LP Gas Problem, Fertile, , Minnesota Slides.and Discussi Midway .. Turkey .Farm , New Munich, Minnesota Slides and Transperency LP Gas Bleve, West St. Paul, - Slides and Discussion. LP Gas Slides on Problems Discussion Transperencies on NFPA #5 Basic Requirements Question and Answer Session 1500 - 1515 Break 1515 - 1630 Continuation, N.F.P.A.. #58 W. Collins W. Werner Second D ... (Tuesday, June 19) 0830 - 1630. Field Inspection, Hotel. R. Imholte W. Collins W. Scherek Note :- All involved students and ins tructors wit meet at Howard Johnson Motel and proceed to a designated hotel for complete inspection of the facility. Those involved will be split. into teams of two persons and will utilize proper formats developed during classes for actual inspections, At conclusion of the inspection, all students and instructors will re assemble at the classroom where a critique and actualorders writing procedure will be processed. Third Da (We dne s day, Jun e 2 0 ) 0830 - 1630._ Field Inspection, Motel. R. Imholte Please refer to notes regarding hotel W. Collins inspection. The same methods of W. Scherek operation will be used. - over t i Week Three (Continued) Jru--ne June 2 2 Time Subj e et Instructor Fourth Day (Thur s day , June 21) 0830 - 1630 .Field Inspection, Resort R. Imholte Please refer, to notes regarding hotel. W Collins inspection, 'The same methods of operation W. Scherek will be used. .Field Inspections Hotel Grand Hotel _ St. Paul, Minnesota Motel Carriage House Motor Lodge 8625 Wayzata Blvd Golden .Valley, Minnesota Resort - Lakeview Resort West Rush. Lake Fifth Dad (Friday, ,dune 22) 0830 - 1000 Exam* nation #2, All Students 1000 1015 Break 1015 -- 1200 Final .Comments , Field Assignments, Graduation W. Collins John Sopsic. Commissioner W.. Werner 1200 - Students Dismissed Note: A special class in fixed systems will be .included during this course depending upon availability of instructor Don Ciardelli , Bloomington Fire Department Training Chief . -over- o V Instructors Wes Werner , State Fire Marshal Wally Collins, ..Ass istant . Division Director, State Fire Marshal Division, Course Coordinator. Ronald Sockness, State Fir e /Ars onllnvestiggtor,. State Fire Marshal Division, Member, Original.. State Fire Chief's Fire. Code Couln%ttee 1.922 - -1975 , Developers of Minnesota Uniform Fire Code Paul. Williams, State Fire Marshal Division District IV Coordinator, Health Care. Instructor of NFPA #101,. Life Safety Code, 1973 edition. Robert Inzh Ate , State Fire Inspector , Fire Marshal Division J Jinn Hanly, State Fire /Arson Investigator, Fire Marshal Division Leonard Kirstein, State Fire Code Specialist, Fire Marshal Division Walter Scherek, State.Fire Inspector, Fire Marshal Division Jane Prohaska, Special Assistant Attorney General, State-of Minnesota \ Assigned to Fire Division Richard Brooks, Assistant Director, State Building Code Division Sivert Hendrickson, Section Chief and Instructor, State Building Code Division William Miller, Special Assistant Attorney General, . Assigned to Health Department me'': Frederick Mitchell, Section Chief Minnesota Health Department, Hotel and Restaurant Licensing Don Ciardelli, Training Chief , Bloomington Fire Department 1 4 blame C? 4 - e 5 Position •- , �. Department - - Title and Location of Training: 0�: ��'��e�. 12., �-- _. Date and Time : t, ,� z e ..,,�� � Len th C da r�d hours) . s a Y Offered By �" ,� 407 S 40 Cost: Nob e This: training has bee discussed with and ' approved b m immediate Y Y supervj.sor . yes no My reason for applying for this training which would be supported by the City of Maplewood ( by tuition payment or time off is: WOOPO Ko M-S 12 e- e a 2z"'-,o e e e-;�z-e_r r Dat { Signature of Applicant. Funds-are for this training in my budget. es . g Y no The above indivi.dual.' s workload will be covered during his/her absence . . Ye s no Approved Not Approved -- Department Head Date � �' v If not approved, reason : Appro Date Hot Approved Personnel Director If not . approve.d, reason: i • - - - .. e'= :mot:.. �.r:7 .-_ rfl AININC APPLICATION Action- by C,oL - N ame Dan Faust 0 1 Sen r,..r.rr.....,.:w.r Position Finance Director eij e s , Department .Finance Minn. Municipal Finance Officers' Association Title and Location of Training An nual Conference, Arrowwood Resort,Alexandria,MN Date and Time. April 16 - 18, 1980 Length ( days and hours )..: 3 days Off By Minn. Municipal Finance Of f icers Association Cost: .$140 This training has been discussed with and approved by my immediate supervisor. yes no My reason for 'applying for this training, which would be supported by the City of Maplewood (by tuition payment or time off work) is I have attended past M.F.O.A. annual conferences and have found them to be well or anized and thought provoking. My attendance at this conference would enable me to learn more about key topics in municipal finance. 2 -12 -80 Date. Signature of Applicant Funds are available for this training n m budget. . X s no g Y g y e r Th above individual' s workload will be covered during his /her absence., c� a� x Yes no -cn Approved Not Approved Department Head a� v Date If not. approved, reason: a� P 0 r.=4 The 1980.Minnesota MFOA Annual conference will be held at the Arrowwood Resort, 'Alexandria from Wednesday, April 16th-to-Friday, April 20th.. Location Arrowwood is located three miles northwest of Alexandria on Lake Darling. From Minneapolis /St. Paul, Arrowwood is a short 140 mile drive west on I -94. Accommodations Individuals are responsible for their own. room and incidental charges. The enclosed room reservation cards are be mailed with paymernt.directly to Radisson Arrowwood before March 15th. Check -in time is 3:00 P.M.; check -out time is noon. Session Schedule The conference will have concurrent sessions at most times. In order to allow for proper planning, registrants are asked to designate, on the registration.form, those sessions they plan to.attend. . Registration Fee: In addition to conference materials, the fee also covers the cost of breakfast for three days and lunch and dinner on Wednesday and Thursday. Capital Improvement. Programming This is a training exercise designed primarily for professionals.. The session uses a case study of the planning and financial considerations of a typical city involved in capital.improvement programming. Program speaker will be Lee Starr, o.f.the Local.Planning Assistance Department, Metropolitan Council. NCGA 'Statement I The session will be a presentation and discussion of the restatement of the..1968.Governmental Accounting, Auditing and Financial Re ortin (GAAFR or the "blue book" of governmental accounting). Session leaders will be John B. Lilja, Manager, Deloitte Haskins and Sells and Dick.Schultz, Controller, Hennepin County, Financial Modeling This program will cover financial modeling as.it can relate to program budgeting and reporting.. Included.is allocation'of indirect costs and the. opportunity for grant reimbursement thereof. The presentation will be made by Wayne Barthel and Robert Blood of Ernst and Whinney. Tax Increment Financing How to analyze, establish and finance a tax increment project. Speakers are Warren treeshl, Vice President, Miller and Schroeder Municipals, Inc., William:`Goblirsch, Miller and Schroeder, and James Holmes, Attorney, Holmes and Graven. Industrial Revenue Bonds The session will cover the roles of the various parties involved with Indus - trial Revenue Bonds. Procedures and requirements for issuance will be dis- cussed.. Members of the panel include Marvin Bruns ell, Finance Director, City of Fridley, Walter Duffey, Attorney, Faegre and Benson, and Thomas Collins of.the Securities' Division, Department of Commerce. Your Audit Dollars This presentation will provide information on how best to prepare for your auditor and how to make the most effective use of money spent on auditing. Also, the selection of an auditor will be covered. Panel members include Dale Hahn. ;. , Finance Director, City of Wayzata., Michael J. Vinyon, Partner, Deloit.te.Haskins and Sells, and Donald Afinson, Partner, Afinson, Hendrickson. and Company. 3 Data Processing Alternatives The t : opic will be covered by Robert Schultheis of. Ernst and Whinney. It will show some features to look for and things to beware of when evaluating data-processing alternatives and costs. Public Utility Rate Setting Various methods of setting rates for utilities will be discussed as well as the theory behind the methods. The presentation will be made by J. Thomas Kirk with Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson and Associates, Inc, MFOA Session Programs (Cont'd.) Pa g, Zoo s . Certificate of Conformance Mr. Robert Trudeau and.Mr.. George Splichal, Chief Accountant and Accountant for the City of St. Paul will - review.and present updated information on the Certificate of Conformance'program.and how it interrelates with the Minnesota State reporting requirements. Cash Management This session will cover how to forecast cash flows and how to make the best use of cash available for investment. Speakers will be Gary Norstrem, Manager -. Treasury Division, City of St. Paul, and Howard J. Bickner, Senior Portfolio Manager, Minnesota State Board of Investment. Fixed Asset Accounting How to set up a Fixed Asset accounting system and keep it operating, as well as the advantages of having a system, will be covered by John Kuharski, Chief Accountant, Hennepin County, and.Nancy. Schulke, Hennepin County and Bob Carlson _ of Gruys, Johnson. and - Associates Health Insurance Alternatives The various forms of.providing coverages for group health needs will, be reviewed. Also the cost, performance and effectiveness of alternative' forms will be dis- cussed. Norman Wells of the Wyatt Company will make the presentation. Arbitrage Lyle Olson of the. City of Bloomington and David Kennedy, Attorney, LeFevere, Lefler, Pearson, O'Brian and Drawz' will review the latest arbitrage rulings for sinking funds and how they affect the investment of debt service funds. Conducting.a Performance Review This session ti711 contain an overview of performance reviews and how they can be used as a tool to improve budgeting,. accounting and expenditure control. The speaker will be Steven Laible, Manager, Peat, Marwick,. Mitchell and Company. Legislative Update Recent legislation and current topics of interest will be discussed with Roger Peterson, Director of Legislative Affairs, Association of Metropolitan Munici- palities. Thursday luncheon speaker will be..John F. Utley of Deloitte Haskins and-Sells. 1 s3 MEMORANDUM TO City Manager. � FROM Finance Director RE Financial Transfers to Close Improvement Projects DATE February 11, 1980 -S Action by Council ; End.orsec� o d .I f J. In order to close the accounting records for 1979, transfers are needed to close certain improvement pro jects,. A total of ten projects need to be closed for the fallowing reasons a) Seven projects because the construction has been completed. b) Two projects because.the'y were denied after public hearings were held. c) one project as the remaining construction will be accounted for in a related project. .All of these projects are accounted for as construction accounts within the Special Assessment The transfers for .the seven. projects to be closed because the construction has. been . completed involve the transfer of cash between other projects financed by the same bond issue. This is in accordance with State law (Chapter 429.091, Subdivision 4) which provides that upon completion and payment.of all costs of an improvement, the construction. "fund may be discontinued and any balance of the proceeds of bonds remaining therein may be transferred by the Council to the fund of any other improvement." The seven projects to be closed are: #74 - Co . Rd. D Storm & Sanitary Sewer Edgerton and Co. Rd . B Storm Sewer #76 -03 Carver Avenue Sewer and water #76 - Mailand Rd. Improvements #77 --0.1 McKnight Road .Curb & Gutter (Beam to R.adatz) #77 --10 ?McKnight Road Utilities (Highwood to Linwood) #78 --08 County Road B Improvements (Germain to Stanich) The attached. resolution provides transfers between these projects and other projects financed by the same bond issue. The interfund transfers for the two projects to be closed because they were denied involve the transfer of cash. General Fund to eliminate deficits as follows $1,175.00 #79 --02 Van Dyke St. Improvements (near County Rd. C) 5 #79 -05 Duluth St. Storm Sewer $7,170.43 Total from the .General Fund The deficits in these projects reflect the cost of the feasibility studies prepared.. The final project to be closed is Project 76 - for the Crestview lst Addition. The final phase of this project will be constructed in conjunction with Project 78 -12 for the Crestview 2nd Addition. Therefore, in order to simplify account 8� in it is proposed that Project 76 -4 be closed. combined with Project. 78.-12 Attached is a resolution which provides for the transfers necessary to clos the above project. Adoption of the resolution is recommended. RESOLUTION BE IT.RESOLVED that the following transfers be made effective December 31, 1979: PROJECT NOS FROM TO $ 9,546 7 7 -10 74 -15 2 77 -01 74-18 10 77 -10 .73 -13 457.60 78 -08 74 -18 9,281.37 75-16 7.6 -03 119,744.92 75 716 76 -07 5,309.93 73 -09 74--11 50.94 78 -12 76-04 1.175.00 General Fund 79 -02 5 , 99.5.45 General Fund 79.05 MEMORANDUM TO City Manager FROM Finance Director G�G� SUBJECT: Interfund Transfers - Engineering and Administrative Charges DATE Feb ruary 14 , .1980 In order to close the accounting records for 1979, interfund transfers. are needed to record in- -house engineering and administrative overhead costs for construction projects. These are routine -annual transfers f rom construction projects to the General -Fund based up policies adopted by the. Council as outlined in Exhibit-A. This year it is proposed that transfers be made . of $192,744 for in- -house engineering and $14,801 for administrative overhead for a total of $207,545. Part these transfers have.already been approved by the Council as on December 20th an $8,809 reduction in past.-charges-for the Crestview Additions was authorized, The $247 , 545 total for 197 is $10, under the amount budgeted. However, engineering expenditures were $21,.812 under the amount budgeted for 1979. For informational purposes, the attached Exhibit B provides a comparision of engineering costs and transfers for the past ten years. The attached resolution (Exhibit C) lists projects for which transfers are needed. It should be noted that the amounts listed do not represent totals for these projects Instead most amounts reflect engineering costs for the past and amounts to adjust prior year transfers for. projects that have been completed. The amounts listed with brackets represent transfers from outside engineering that were not included in the calculation of 1978 in -house engineering costs. Adoption of the resolution is recommended. Actio' n .bY . Gounc -! I Endorsed... Re ject s d....... Date„ � • a 1 • • • ^ "l n � A C� ill 't n 1 s 1; r Zt t i v e .• pol icy . �'� fc�r cotl�4�u 1:�� �; pan of lt�g �t ncc�l 9 . f Co sts for co nstructi on P j ccts Co • r and 77-1 ( Pe r Resolutions 73- X 12 -29� Fo[zM _A • Project Di ffic«1 ty - Payments C i ty % E n.g • Costs Construction X X Factor outside Eng Costs Costs Pro j oct Construct Costs X Adm. Costs - OE T the ri t��e contractor .DEFINIT ^ /actual or estimated costs by p Project �Co uct of hos . for construction of the improve- .�___�- ^ contractors , or day 1 labor costs supnlet y , meat authorized. rates charged by pri . The p t.�sed is based upon r - accord -- % Engin • Costs. p .� - e } ^o'oct construe .ion costs ' runs and i s a function o, the p j engineering f • i n 0 to the following table . _ Total Basic Services - End • Feasibility & Design). �. C osts ction Re0 C Per Exhibit B Survey I nspe - ucti on Cost Ranee I 8/ 1 9.5 / Co _ 8.5/ 21 500 s 000 ° 8% 1 l 1 7.5 % a 6 5/ 2I o $ 1 5 000 5 00.0 0 ° 8l 11 1 7.01 501 ,00 2/ o M J0 000 6.0/ ° 1 / 16.5/ ,001 ,00.0 $2 3 2% 8� $A p00 000 5.5� $2 s 3 - the city engineer • factors shall be assigned by • • Factor: Difficulty fac ,ents in .rel ation to the Di f f i cul t.y e 5 to 2.0 , by ..25 i ncrem eacF� project ranging from on suc �� pro and the t0 b de artment personnel amount of time spent y p. it Proj ects difficulty of Such in relation to all C y • pa to an eng ineer= • o : Actual or est pa�mten A fora outside i de Enq� neeri n e or in any other fashion paym�.nts n re are plans , nspect , Tn �_ g ed to aesig p p in such are speciali firm_ eng - ro ect. Not .included. the eneral scope of the p •�• testing procedures, other oversee 0 1 and surveys , sped , c t g r other i neering costs.such as the City's engi neers, o .9 _ en . en i neeri t s cos o versees n governmental g spe cial al or non -t y pical services n -- • p ercent-used is a functio of the project con- The i ni strati ve � Costs . % Adm y--- -- to the following table s truct10n costs • Adm. Costs Cons truct _c}� , 0% i on Cost o M 500 000 5005,000 15000,000 0 000 - 1 , 500 , 000 7 1,00 ° (' 0 2,000.)000 ° 1 , 5 00,,00 - 000 000 �. 2., 5Q0 s 000 2, � 2 500 000 -- 3,000,0 00 s s a' Exhibit . B ENGINEERING COSTS AND TRANSFERS - 1970 - 1979 Transfers to General Fund General Fund From Construction Projects Engineering In -House Administrative .. Year Costs Engineering Overhead 1979 $ 213,823 $ 192,744 $ 14,801 1978 165,101 133 5 118 21 1977 173 183 38 1976 183 153 16 1975 147 72,225 16 _ 1974 99 102,048 15 1973 91,549 76 - 19,785 1972 91,353 65 -0- 1971. 99 -0- 1970 95. 331 - 0- -0- .r: RESOLUTION .BE IT RESOLVED; that effective December 31, between the following construction projects and the engineering-and-administrative costs: PROJECT TRANSFER T NO. ENGIN LX[1.L:D.LL U 1979 transfers be made General Fund for in -house D (FROM) GENERAL FUND. ADMINIS TRATIVE TOTAL - 75-16 Water System Improvements $ 27,795 76. 07 Mailand Rd. 39 77 -07 Maplewood Hts. 9th Addition .2,491' 77-09 Gervais -- Germain to White Bear Ave. 7 77 -10 McKnight Rd . -- Highwood to Linwood 2 77 -12 Maryland Ave. 40 77 -14 Beam and Lydia Connection 7,440 .77 -16 Ridgewind Addition 398 - 78 ---01 Gervais --East of Hwy. 61 4,052 78 -03 Rehnberg lst Addition 143 78 -04 Van Dahl Addition 85 78 -05 Venture Woods Addition 131 78 -09 Water on East Shore Drive 4 78 -10 Hillwood Drive 4,598 78 -11 DeMars 10th Addition .687 78--13 Forest Street 10 78 -18 Condor Storm Sewer 1 78° -19 Hillcrest Development 7 .78 -21 Sandhurst- VanDyke -Hazel 1 78 -24 Beam - West of Hwy. 61 7 79 -01 Cope Connection r 49913 79 -02 Van Dyke - Near County Rd. C 1 79 -04 English St. - Ear County Rd. C 10,640 79 -05 Duluth St. Storm Sewer 5 79 -06 1979 Diseased Tree Program -0- 79 -08 .Gladstone Park.Storm Sewer 2 79 -15 Radatz & Southlawn 2. 79 -18 Water Extension - White Bear Ave, 240 Sub - -Total 199 Crestview Additions Reductions.. Approved by Council on 12-20-79 (6. Totals For 1979 .$192 , 7.44 • 1,684 3,341 2,332 292 7,070 1,022 34 -0- . 63 382 120 -0- -0- 481 -0_ -O- -0- -0- -0- -0_ -0- -0- -0- 37 7 -0- -0- (2 $ 14,801 $ 29,479 42,966 4,823 7,077 2,702 47,200 8,462 .432 4,052 206 467 251 4,950 4,598 1,1.68 10,017 1,920 7,960 1 7,599 4,913. 1,175 10,640 5,900 377 2 2 Z16 1 354 (8,809) $ 207,545, r a MEMO T-O: C i ty Ma n a g From: Director of Community Services ' S ub Engineering Servic Da to : ...February 14 , 1980 Backgr We are currently in the planning and design process of the North Hazelwood. Park .project. As you know, one part of thi s project is the 1 i ghti ng of a soccer field . Because -the City does not have anyone .on staff with . the necessary skills, I think i t J very important to hire an electrical engineer to do this work f us . Attached you will find bid proposals from three firms. These th.ree firms were chosen because of their demonstrated work on other projects of this magnitude, I personally interviewed a representative of each - firm.. The "Not to Exceed" bids. for this. work were: W. J. Suther' and & Associates, Inc. $239.0 Eri cksen El l i son . & Associates, Inc. - $2400 Gausman & Moore, I.nc. - $2 Recommendation Staff suggests the Council enter i nto an agreement. wi th W. i Sutherland & Associates Inc. for the design of lighting one soccer fi at North Hazelwood Park. The amou 'i s not to -exceed $2,390.0.0. The Park and Recreation Commission at their regul ar. meeti ng of February 11 unani approved this recommendati Action by Council: Endorsed • l io di i ed......�.r. Rejected. Date - This will confirm our conversation with our Mr. Norman Klaassen relative to our doing the design work for soccer 1 fighting and possibly park lot lighting , LU _ - i We will prov complete sets of plans and spec suitable for bidding and: construction for the lighting work as described in February 5, 1.980 your job description* It is our understanding that, although it n would be most desirable to have a six pole layout for the _soccer +� ° 0 z' field, your budget may be limited so that a four pole arrangement W (1) would be selected . The cost of two poles in your parking lot . 0 would be slightly more expensive than two additional poles for va City of Maple-wood • u may wish to del l the fi field li and hence yo y Y g 0 M 6' w 1380 Fros t Avenue .d a ., c Maplewood, MN .55109 C. what level of play, .either recreational or possibly comp etitive •� , N r. .�C . ATTENTION: Mr. Eric .Blank We will, of . course , work very closely with you or your assigned •� p ersonnel so that the greatest amount of work can be accomplished. � C5 d Subject, North Hazelwood ark P for your budget. 'tllle will also review shop drawings and perLo i .\4 Engineering Services o of ,athl.etLc field light des igns. and certa inly beI ieve that we are g Dear Eric: best equi ed to select the type of f fixtures and luminaires so you pp C will rece the .most econom and sa installation . - This will confirm our conversation with our Mr. Norman Klaassen relative to our doing the design work for soccer 1 fighting and possibly park lot lighting , LU _ - We will prov complete sets of plans and spec suitable for bidding and: construction for the lighting work as described in your job description* It is our understanding that, although it n would be most desirable to have a six pole layout for the _soccer +� ° 0 z' field, your budget may be limited so that a four pole arrangement W (1) would be selected . The cost of two poles in your parking lot . 0 would be slightly more expensive than two additional poles for va �-• • u may wish to del l the fi field li and hence yo y Y g 6' w parking lot in: .favor of a better 1 ight level and distribution for . C , This decis ion probably would be based on the playing field � C. what level of play, .either recreational or possibly comp etitive •� d undoubtedly, high school. The high school play would, y, be bes served by the sLx pole layout. We will, of . course , work very closely with you or your assigned p ersonnel so that the greatest amount of work can be accomplished. for your budget. 'tllle will also review shop drawings and perLo i C ally observe the construction in the field to ascertain specification oom Hance. We have of course, accomplished literally hundreds of ,athl.etLc field light des igns. and certa inly beI ieve that we are g best equi ed to select the type of f fixtures and luminaires so you pp C will rece the .most econom and sa installation . Cn As you requested, we. offer an engineering fee on an hourly base N rate with a "not to exceed" maximum. Our maximum fee based on will not: exceed . your budget of some $31,000 $2390. o , r • � i ns x.... ` . r . r. C ity of M apl ewo.od .Page 2 February 5, 19 8 4 . We � will of course kee p accurate accounting. of our engineering hours and out-of-pocket expenses so that the total cost to you for the amount of work requested will not exceed that figure We are attac a list of our employees most likely to work on Yo ur p ro'ect � alon g with their hourly wage rate. These hourly � charges times a factor of. 2. 5, will be charged you for our time spent in your behalf. We wish to ' tak e this opportunity to thank you for allowing us to offer our services in this instance . We have enjoyed an excellent relationship with you in the past and look forward to continuing our good rapport. We would be pleased to receive this engineering comm iss Lon . Yours very truly, W. SUTHERLAND AND ASSOCIATES INC T ill iam J . Sutherland ' WJS:pas Enclosure f F t � 1 1 R 4 r a . . x t� M CO CN r. c� U) o e Ln a o O 0 f co i N 4 N :3 $s .0 • M CD C e'er Q) m M EMPLOYE - E RATE SCHEDULE January 1, X1980 Will iam j. Sutherland jock O. Sutherland Norman W. Klaassen William P. Moeller Cory D . Sutherland Typist Dra ftsman $17,50 per hour $12.2 0 per hour $10,50 per hour $ 9.65 per hour $ 8.75 per hour $ 7.3 5 per hour $ 5.50 per hour �. i � � V i � �] L.. � VF 1.. l.. L i J V a `i !'� 1 V ►..i r\ V V v V 1 !-\ � 4. V � � • v o . v . v . . • .. v v ... . . • • . .� . v ... "� ... . �. ... .. �-.� �. 1 J ' r CONSULTING ENGINEERS February .8 1980 City of Maplewood MR ERIC BLANK - Parks Director 1380 Frost Avenue - Maplewood MN 55109 Dear Mr Blank We wish to offer our services for the lighti of the North Hazel wood Park soccer field. We ro ose to perform all those services outlined in the scope of required P p services that you have provided. Those services are as follows I. PRILIMINARY PHASE A. Make recommendations regarding system. II. DESIGN PHASE A. Preparation of design plans, specif and bidding docur,ents. D Help co ntact i n.g companies to bid. C. Assi ss i sta nce' in advertising for buds and recommendations on award of bids • III. CONSTRUCTION PHASE A. Periodic .observation of work in progress. .B. Review of shop drawings. Co Review. request for partial 'or full payment. D. Fi nal i nspection. For these services our charges will be based on hourly costs plus a fee and' Plus us ep x enses. For. the. servi ces outl i ned our charges wi 11 not exceed $2400. . DARRYL J. DROBA GEORGE P. ELLISON LEIF W. ERICKSEN BRUCE 01INSON LAVERNE "VERN" NELSON' MlONTY TALBERT'SR. o h Paue Two Mr Eric Blank . February 8 1980 The hourly ates at t-hi s time Y for our personnel are as fol 1 ows . . P . Principal $42.00 Senior Designer 25900 to 39.00 Junior Designer 18.75 to 25.00 Drafters 7.50 to.18.'75 Typists 7.50 to 15.. 00. - Administrator 28.75 These rates will change as the economy dictates. - I thank you for your, consideration. 5i nc rely C ' 0eo P Ellison PE JJ • r F I GAU 9. M OO Inc. ONSULTING ENGINEERS.. ' 700 N ROBERT STREET ST PAUL, MINNESOTA 55103 225 -f577. February 8, 1980 ci of 14aplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Attention: Mr. Erik Blank Re ; City of Maplewood Forth Hazelwood Soccer .Lighting De ar Mr. Bla J appreciated the opportunity to meet with you on . Monday, February 4, 1980; in response to your request to the above project, We propose to do the following work if selected. 1. Preliminary Phase . (a) Study a four (4) or six (6) pole design using: high pressure sodium f i.xture-s for above. project and make recommendations to the city. 2. Design Phase (a) Prepare plans and specifications for bidders which includ service feeders, lighting standards and lights, foundations, contact the ..plower• company on size and type transformer, size distribution • cabinet and the number of breakers for slow pitch field. lighting, make lighting calculations, voltage. drop ca l-cula tions , and short circuit calculations, (b) Help in contacting electrical contractor . to bid the project. (c) Assist in advertising for bids and make recommendations on award of bids. 39 : Cons truc t ion - Phaa e • (a) Review shop drawings, (b) Periodic observation of the work, in progress. (c) Review partial and full payments ' to the electrical contractor. (d) Final inspect and one post f inal ins-pec t ion . 4. Provide two seta of plans and. specifications du ring design phase for review .and up to 12 se for construction documents GORDON 8 MOORE GLENN F GAUSNIAtJ ap0tiA.0I P fi WE L 0: W CLEVEI AND L RAY - . .I�r+: � •.•. ..rr+.. w. w...•.....� �- �.... .- .. --..- ..,.. .�. r , .. r,..: .. ...,M w++..e.1T�. .•.'1• +•: ..... ,... ;y � • �v.�..t +!.r•M+t. n s 1 • city cif Maplewood M2-- February 8, 1980 Wa propose to. do this on an hourly basis., based on the: following rates.: fie,istered Lng,ineer $3S per hour . St'. Il to E, Il�Jn ing Technician $28 p hour Jiitjinr k;n ;�.x .c:ering Tcchnician $22 per hour T � e Kour I y. ra Los inc lode ..a l.1 overhead_ items including typist's ti.nie required y or t ho Pervicas listed above, we will Iim it' our compensation to a maximum of , s t�i, (?cj. If . further work is requested, it can be done at the same rates, 1= t to ;lot itic ludo vi thin the maximuun . Limit. 4 nc 10dod i abovo scope of work shou be furnished by the Owner. P-So Y r:ra 12. follows 1. A topographical survey and site plan 2. Soil boring tests 3. Service b61lding electrical design Wo would apprec pprec is to your consideration of our firm's comprehensive ive services and nd look forward to the opportunity to participate in this project. Very.* Lr_ uly yours, (;AU�1MAN & MOORE , INC. . d !• F►tS L . ha M,MR . NORTH HAZELWOOD SOCCER LIGH FING SCOPE OF SERVICES I . DESIGN PHASE ONE SOCCER FIELD A} Prepare plans and speci fications for bi ddrs which includes service feeders, outside cabinet, lighting standards and lights, *foundations.'; contact the Poiger Company on size an.d type of ' transformer, size di stri bution cabinet and the number of breakers; make l i ghti calculations, voltage drop cal cu lations and shout circuit calculations. B} Help in contact.i.ng electrical contractors to b.id on P ro J 'e -ct _ C) Make recommenda i ton on award of bid II. CONSTRUCTION PHASE A} Review shop drawings B} Peri odi c obs.ervation of'. the work in progress C} Review all requests for payments D} Make final i nspectio.n .III OTHER A} Provide two sets of plans and specifications fi cati ons for City staff P y to review B} Provide up to 12 sets of P 1 ans and s P eci fi cati.ons for b driers Ill. THIS SHOULD BE BID AS A "NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT" LISTING HOURLY RATES FOR INDIVIDUAL SERVICES FROM YOUR FIRM. V. The City wi 1 l enter into an A. I A. Document B141 ".Standard Form Of Agreement Between Owner And Architect", with. some- niodi f i cat.i ons . CONTACT PERSON: Eric Blank Director of Community Services • City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood , Minnesota 55109 Phone: 770 -4570 o J MEMORANDUM TO City Council FROM Barry R. Evan"`' Y- -- sue.-- -- ° --- '_" SUBJECT.: Negotiations DATE February 14, 1980 The AFSCME Clerical -- Technical and Maintenance Personnel have voted to accept the City's lash offer. I,recommend that you approve the following as.provisions of the 1980 contract with them. 1. 8.5% increase with a 50� minimum for 1980. 240 Health and Dental Insurance payments not to exceed $75 per mo. 30 5th week of vacation after 20 years. 4. An additional floating holiday. 50 19�_ a mile for use of personal car. 60 $20 annually for purchase of steed toed safety boots. 7. Pay for . 30 minutes arrival . time , when. called out for emergencies at other than normal reporting time. 8. 1/2 hour unpaid break after 5 consecutive hours of work. Ac tion by Council :1 It', c d .. f i n d.....�._.____ Re j ected��.�. Date . .�.. MEM To: C ty Manager From:. Dire of Community Services Subject: Hu Re.l ati Commission Appointment Dat February 14 The term - of Maria Larsen has. exp•i red from the Human Rel ations Commission. She would like to be re- appointed for a three year term. Maria is the current Chairperson, The term of James Mall has also expired. He does not wish to be re- appointed. Th.e Council should thank him for-his service By way of information, the Human Relati Commi ssi on current - ly has four vacan:ci es We w i l l be adverti these o p 9 eni n s Action..by Council:' E n o r se, d.� .� j Date February 14, 1980 STAFF REPORT Act'i on by C, c To : City Manager Barry Evans - � From. Chief of Police R. W. Schaller Subject Designation of Impound Lot and Towing. Contractor for Staff has been negotiating with two towing contractors for towing and impounding of vehicles.in 1980. Two companies have lots in Maplewood and have indicated an interest. Their proposals areas follows: Art's Emer enc Towin .Service, 2385 English Street Towing City of Maplewood Police vehicles No' Charge Towing.of standard size vehicles $30.00 per unit All accidents $35 per unit Dollies $15.00 per unit Flatbed service $40.00 minimum per unit Large trucks or heavy equipment $55.00 minimuni.per unit* Winching of vehicles $30.00 minimum per unit Storage rates per day $ 5.00 per unit All vehicles impounded or towed by the City of Maplewood to Art's Emergency Towing,.Inc. will be secured by a fenced and lighted storage area.. All vehicles will be released twenty --- four hours per day, seven days a week. All vehicles will be released upon proof of ownership to the proper party. All monies will be collected by Art'. s . Em.ergency Towing, Inc Art's Emergency Towing, Inc. will take full. responsibility for .vehicles in their custody. Maplewood Auto & Transmission Service, 2727 E. Minnehaha Avenue Locked and fueled storage charge $ 3.50 per day, day of tow in is free Minimum tow $ 25.00 Dolly tow $15.00 ..extra Winch tow $15.00 extra We have had both of these companies perform these services in the past.' During 1979, Maplewood Auto declined to submit a proposal, however, this year they are doing so with the understanding.. that they would only be available during daytime hours. Staff recommends, both proposals .be accepted and designated as towing contractors and impound lots for 1980 with either service being; utilized depending on the part of Maplewood involved and the time ..of day. Maplewood Auto has requested their insurance carrier to furnish proof of liability 'insurance. They will riot be designated until they furnish the required pro . f of insurance. RWStjs a o a '1'1:A1:N . PP LICA'PI aN • lame Eric Blank Act or, by colurc�l , Position Direct .of Community Servi 0 :,. DePar Comm Services 3 • . - ...�.. --- --�.- ----- Dat Title and Locat �.on of Training : "Enhancing Your Communication Strategies" _ bt. Li oud Minnesota Date `,Pi le : March 13 + 14 Leng (days. -and hours 2 Days � y � offered M.R.P .-A. Cost: - $150.00 This - tralIl ng has been dis cu.s� s ed approved by Y e m immediate supervisor. X yes no Hy reason for applying for this training which would be su ported b % the Ps City of I :�laplaod ( b tt��.tion pymn or time off work) is : Thi training should help me better understand and comr�un i cate ' . with c� - t�zens, my staff, and Boards and Cpmmi ss i.ons , etc. February Date S Lure ox A� 1ica_ n g _P Funds are available for this training in m budget, . X yes Y g S n The. above individual I s ' workload will be covered during is /her abs g s nce . Yes no Approved. Not. .. e low Date Febrdary '14 1980 Department Head If not approved, reason: • Approved Not Approved r - 'er'sonr: e l Di-rector Date If not approved, reas orl : - - -- -- - - - ........... . .... . 1"RAINING A P 1) !..#.1 CATI 0 IN au1 i n Ada 1011 Program C ord�nator bep. 1r'L111en t Co Services i .Y , II •. ^AaIVn�Y a.s1.YyL``3•.nNV�Y•t• %. - ° Title and Loca on r - o� Traa.n�.ng : E n h a n c i nq Your Communication St • Date and Ti Date St• Cl oud, Mi nneso ate 7 es March 13 & 14 Len -t� to r g (day and hours) 2 Days of fex-le d By Minn • Minnesota R,ecrea.tion and Park As • soc�at�on Cvs-t: - 15 . $ 0.00 Tb zs oral nln . has e • ben discussed w ith and ��pP Supervisor.. X x'oVed by jn - y es no y edzate 14Y reaso for - • Cie �PF� -y ng for tills drain , ty of Maplewood (b • -;- �--n c r��.cr�. would be su �- y u� �zon payme�� or -c o ppor� d by th Iz� ot� work) mss: � would l i k e to atte nd the conference titled ` Enhance ng-- Your. Communi Strategies" to cati improve communication skills 1 s an . - ki d to provide profess o na1 growth i n th f i.el d of comet _ unication. --- February 14 1980 Date Signal ure of .z . p1�c�_nL Funds are availa f or tb.is - tra . ;.ni1�g y - . z n my b u d.gea -t , X The above individ yes n ua�. ! s workload .Will be. -- .� Yes no covered during his/her g is�ner absence . Approved X . Not Approved .Date I f o t approved yeas' - epar tment Head � on. Z I pprove d Not Approved Da te c _�or�re 1�reC t or If not approved, reason. ; �� Ap EMT `t � ; t t 1 1 _ 4 i F 1 f i i i i 1 1 7 r i F 1 f i i i i 1 1 Sunwood Inn and Covention Center St. Cloud, Minnesota Larch 12, 13 and 1980 ENHANCING YOUR COMMUNICATION -STRATEGIES F ( � W t T pB Third Anneal Multi- Agency Conference S� Sponsored by r.� _.t �3 M innesot a Assoc-iation o a o ® C ontinui-n t. i Adult " , i -- Y P O V 0 a° 3 J ',. i t:' .r i 10M ® rc ` {II{ G UOU ` 2f �P 1 ® As s, cmut'i an IrJt fLgri M , / n n , e sm; o t a HU c reation a n d RIM% rk . A IV lu r�a s Xmil sso l Sunwood Inn and Covention Center St. Cloud, Minnesota Larch 12, 13 and 1980 1 co W 0 Cr o ca cQ 0- D o ° `o 0 .0 rn ^ V) w Co �- CD A -� m tn co CU 'A m O o m 1 • cn co W 0 Cr o ca cQ 0- D o ° `o 0 .0 rn ^ V) w Co �- CD A -� m tn co CU O . n Co. p c � m O o m CL =r CD o n o G) ca CL �o cn Q cQ �' -s CA. 3 ca O' N 0 D "{ Fu ° ° ° o' a..< ,:' O -0 3 0 0 �< 3 Please make checks payable - to MRPA and mail. to: . CD Cr � N ? M -�' C CD - I QO z o W CD ° Q ° : m - 0 O 0. r+ � O A . 3 N -t 0 N O •p' T r+ r+. CD - ° n 7c 0 ; N O 0 Cn Ct) co N _ O `C _ C: _ - n m t� - Cn '� = 0 W o O m -- - z N C: H V1 ` w CD o O --( CD .. .. 0 0, N O © ° N O = O 0 CD z cf) CD 0 CD A 0 O Cr . H 0 (� 0. °- -� Co , , 0 --� N p O �' n O cn Cr � m O c c CD D � CD W W M M < ° C N p' N O r Q_ O p CD "'' CD vOi N cc 3 A E F' O Q A'CO`2 z n w v m G° _ r * O _ W W N O A N ' • 3 m A �� O' 0 CD O' O • r+ C CD -� C (n to O N M CD Cr CD CD '-� '"'. A O O 0— Q -s r-r — Z N CD 0' M -t c7 p CD .< < O =' -- ro '� • cn co W 0 Cr o ca cQ 0- D o ° `o 0 .0 rn ^ V) w Co �- CD A -� m tn co CU O . n Co. p c � m O G) O CL co N < .r* �� CD c a. CA°'� °�N CD ° w H CL 0 -►, cn Q cQ �' -s CA. ° s r' ca O' N 0 D "{ = v r+ ° ° ° o' a..< ,:' O c. 3 -t �, m 0 0 �< ARRIVAL DATE HOUR Please make checks payable - to MRPA and mail. to: . CD Cr � N ? M -�' C CD - I oo z o W CD ° Q ° : m - 0 O 0. r+ � O A . 3 N -t 0 N O •p' T r+ r+. CD - ° n 7c 0 ; N O 0 Cn Ct) co N _ O `C _ C: _ - n m t� - Cn '� = 0 W o O m -- - z N C: H V1 O Q. CD O -t -t to G) N az xi 0. — I 0 "S O C 0 CU• --( CD .. .. 0 0, N O n O O' N O = O 0 CD - t -p 01 CD H O r+ CD .< Cn 77 y 0 co ° cf) CD 0 CD A 0 O Cr . H 0 (� 0. °- -� Co , , 0 --� N p O �' n O cn Cr � m O c c CD D � CD W W M M < ° C N p' N O r Q_ O p 0CM 0 ,< ca C !*' "'' CD vOi N cn 0- S r -O -� N' '� O A E F' O Q A'CO`2 z n C " o E 0 g -0 ( D m G° _ r * O _ cu. O N' Q- W N O A N ' • 3 m A �� O' 0 CD O' W -a C C CD ° r+ C CD -� C 0 vs O N 0 °- ca ° C e. to O N M CD Cr CD CD '-� '"'. A O O 0— Q -s r-r — Z CD 0 O H A — O CO CD Z -t c7 p CD .< < O =' -- ro '� _. . t O c cp D < CD A G) tQ 03 O O a o Cn rF N N ° c • C cD cD C O A G) 0 CL _• ._ O C > 0 a) co C Qr CD DJ A :3 CD iD N 3 O O 0- H C Q +1 O O z3' CD O .< O O J� > Cn 0 to r* = M ? S, -� C o n d N tt a.: o D -4. z � D v Q r- 0 o 0) 0 < r CD m z D o W �7 n) w CD ° A rn ^ V) w Co �- CD A -� .. C w -�, Q. o .--A N ,� a + °+ .� -'' =- cn CD - a � Cl) -I �' D . t • a o ca Q °- -o 0 to c� � � X v cn ° Q- --� �, o ° o o cc n o 0 -P -0 ° CD o ��*.CD o . .a� (D w `�' <'3�0"°'�CD 'O - C 0 O < .r* �� CD c a. CA°'� °�N CD ° w �-* r+ N 0 r- cn Q cQ �' -s CA. ° s r' ca O' N 0 D "{ = v r+ ° ° ° o' a..< ,:' O -- Z m O A N 0 0 �< ARRIVAL DATE HOUR Please make checks payable - to MRPA and mail. to: . CD 'Pick Jorgensen, 415 Blake Road North, Suite No. 6, a. CL ° A o o ry o - o W CD ° Q ° : m - 0 O 0 W ° cn CD °' T r+ r+. CD - ° n 7c 0 ; • 0- , N n C/) 3 O 0 Cn p Q a Q -,, Z -+, -a -� �' ;*: < r+ �" f4 CD CD Z O O z C ,< . ,, 0 -►, CD CD o . + A r+ v, CD' - n m t� - Cn '� = 0 W o O m -- - z N C: H V1 N Q. CD O -t -t to G) N az xi 0. — I 0 "S O C 0 CU• --( C Q' "(S N W --� CD CD -,, 0 °.o Cr n O O' N O = O 0 CD - t -p 01 CD H O r+ CD .< Cn 77 y 0 co ° cf) CD 0 CD A 0 O , , 0 --� N p O �' n O cn Cr � m O c c CD D � CD W W M M < ° C N p' N O r Q_ O p Cn "'' CD vOi N cn 0- S r -O -� N' '� O A E F' O Q A'CO`2 z n ��? W CD '..� '��{ m G° _ r * O _ cu. O N' Q- W N O A N ' • 3 m A �� O' 0 CD O' O r+ C CD -� C 0 vs O N 0 °- ca ° C e. to O N M CD Cr CD CD '-� '"'. A O O 0— Q -s r-r — Z CD 0 O H A — O CO CD Z -t c7 p CD .< < O =' -- ro '� -, A O N �• cD a G) tQ 03 O O a o CU n C CD CD p° O C cD cD C O A G) 0 CL _• ._ O C > 0 3 H C Q +1 O O z3' CD O .< O O J� > .s 2 . O c � ` _ O 3 N 0 N • A O .3 a- CD — % -41 1 CD r+ : O O �* Q . r+ . O O Cn �' r+ —h Q. •< . m Z _ -n M CD M m� � C po.p D °I to c Z D � .C- C) z o A m a� cn 6- Z Z N O CD -, 0 0 m n� o co y �< A ° �CD m CD � N ' CL CD m o• m rQ (D =r D 3 -t NAME c� 00 -n 0 f P. O. Box 1066 M CD CD St. Cloud, MN 56301 O ..; ? A `C CD CD ORGANIZATIONAL AFFILIATION(S) * double occupancy. Rates shown do not include tax. w NAME . 3 Q' H C7� y z ° s r' 00'W Co v O n D "{ r+ n ° ° ° o' a..< ,:' O -- Z m O A N 0 0 �< ARRIVAL DATE HOUR Please make checks payable - to MRPA and mail. to: ' 'Pick Jorgensen, 415 Blake Road North, Suite No. 6, W CL CD Rooms are held until 6 p.m. unless deposit is paid in advance. Check in time after. 3 p.m. and check out 3� - n v D ,� �� o cD O A oCD�D 3 CL CL 0 �, 3 0 CD m �.y *�°' A O 0 ID S W 0 3 CL V1 ��• CO =- CD ° oQ Q- cQ =r - o W D � o O ° ' 0 0 ' 3.�� CD -,, 0 °.o Cr n n: N O = O 0 CD A D O O to CD CD CO CD O a, Q• �' Cr � m O c c CD D � CD W W M M < C �r+.0. N 6 O -* CD 7C'N A E F' O Q A'CO`2 z n ��? W CD '..� '��{ D cu. O N' Q- 3 x ­J Z3 .< CD O —' O N -- ct < O r+ C CD -� C 0 vs O N 0 °- ca ° C e. O CD z W y ;•� n r+ cD =r F 3 o _*. N Z mom ema rerr emu" oft ow R•as or r� ®ss pv �s +care va �� mum gyp• Registration Form -Joint Spring Conference MACAE, tee: Boa av ��e .•a m sew �s iir� a w•: W=ft 4 � Hotel Registration -Joint Spring Conference, MACAE ' MCEA, MRPA - March 12-13-14,1980 MCEA, MRPA - March 12-13-14,1980 NAME Mail to: Sunwood Inn f P. O. Box 1066 ADDRESS 1 Sunwood Dr. St. Cloud, MN 56301 CITY STATE - ZIP 4 Circle one: Single: $25.50 ( * 29.50), Double: $29.50 f ( 33.50), Poolside: $32.50 ( * 36.50) ORGANIZATIONAL AFFILIATION(S) * double occupancy. Rates shown do not include tax. NAME FEE: $42.00 - includes continental breakfast, lunch, banquet, refreshment breaks, instructional materials j ADDRESS and evening entertainment. All participants must pre - register. by March 3, 1980. No refunds wily be CITY STATE ZIP granted after pre- registration.dead line. ARRIVAL DATE HOUR Please make checks payable - to MRPA and mail. to: ' 'Pick Jorgensen, 415 Blake Road North, Suite No. 6, ! DEPARTURE DATE HOUR Hopkins, MN 55343 Rooms are held until 6 p.m. unless deposit is paid in advance. Check in time after. 3 p.m. and check out time 12 noon. o • 4 ti C Co .0 , C -0 cv V) a) o • `�' O -r- cu a) C +� O -C a, o. o r C CO -� o L_ -- o ` U cu 0 C . > Co. ' cam .`° :3 , to • = a) E O . c '" c (n 0 • � Q CD �cu ��. Q ` ;: in Z .0 ' a, ra Q, • ? O C 0 p cj E a) O c am: `°. �-'•� J ,� � � ►� o'� o USaQ 4-J Q +� ca .., . C .0 : v) C C �y q� +-+ U (10 o Q- `o > C O a C. - a• „ fi . + _• e o •– +-' C O C L. .0 O Q, O a) ..0 E U N a) C fj cu a) O N .;? - - N cn C L �-- + C�) �" (� +-+ U C tn. C S O `*- U U .S� U +-' a) N , Q Q °.0 f 0 cu N O W U - '+ - N __ o = . i.. S • C . X Z7 v, • c U '" U 0 x cu Cj C C • V a) U C cu < cu rJi' C 'U im a) ' L O O O > C c4 O ""! C. U w O O , C> a - N a) cu U O — �„ -- E N• 0) a) v U rg N D C N ��.0 cri rn . Cn co . � Q a) N � � N N a) N cu "' .,_i . Q T3 C CL - O 0 >' L 'L3 C . - E . a) +•� C - 0 U a. ,,. C _ 2 � C +-j c ' �n C o - > Z a) cu Cn . _ U cu p 0 ._ • Q C ..� O C CD , O - O ca 0 . 0_ 4 L w(n m N Q- cu s r •-- — �O 0CaD� � °o 'er_ cu 4✓ +-� U > O () a) cu cu > cu �-• +-' -� --- C w N 4U U L a� O t!3 '0 C °O, , C 0 �, = L �+, C �. ?� +-' o 0 p- 0 , cu cu Cu j a; "' C 4- U LL — C �+- L O ca C CC O. ° U. O cu cu U •_ �+- CA Q I- CB Q Cn • v O a c O > N Co C .i � 4% Aa .� cu cu Q) i N' cu .._- _ • C ..0 N N >• U I c C cn ar . N > +-+ N O S' cu C E U +-� . �„ a) tm cn +-+ O Z .L i•- C cn cu C .� _ U> C cu _ O C +� cv S O ..E E •U O � '> U 0 cu C: N. O O w U C . C. U L O O .0 . +- •+•, cu > U - v Cz . �; > Cl. — -0 Eo a) +-A C O N U cu 4_ Q C N C — ' L. a) N O • cn CO "C3 -C = X N C. cn U . cu - L V . O U C Cu .'. � � U .� O °L •� C O C a) C O �-+ N '- cu m C O 4-J :3 E ' . N cm O . o -p a- N a) +` ..i c C cu C (3) CO cu , I° cu a = = ro .-+ ca cu - 0 = E N 4 cu M . _ N Cn C 'L7 ` cv � cv cv t 0 +-,. O +-+ C X cu C p C ?' w m a, U• Q a3 L Q °C' 4- cs, E� ;C O C' i N us O �, N C - o — U C - 0 O N L U cu cu CL W C ? CL '+--' CU � C L • G . = U E N 0 Q C O Co Q -j C 0 E cu O t� N -' N N +-' 'O N ' %_ C -C a) �„ = clf� a) E :3 tn ro — - C C C C a) Cu C. a, �--- C N C C• U 0 O • — + C - N O a) C- U y U C C -C , V -C , U_ +., cu U- L _ (j _J O on a) a) O cv cv _ +..., � C O N U > N U > Ct3 N cCS cv co E Q - _ �+- to L N -- LU vi ' O .� . -C a) , v' • Q • U C i +_j 'i'' - ° • ca a) .L1°. +-► m -. - O cu cu C N ' C a) -0 E L +-0 a) p c . . v E a) w � C cu N -o C cm C _ M C z N . Q >- E � , to • C- cu C .� = U: L. 0 _ -- > C L N ct3 M O cu cn C =- E ca cu • — a) a) a) > + - � . O U cu N � - C N +'' O U.. + N> L L a) U= C O +- N C a) N U a) �+- O = w (1) -C CL • O_ Q C 0 0 N O '– a ) M N Q O >. cu .' � a-) CV Z v U Cr a) 7; cu rn E , LL tn (A C • U , = N m m _0 U cn v, U U O ca C + , N C +� V 0 $_ tn cu O a) E m 62 • U CL E �+- cn 4- • — cu 4- cu •+-� E D C cv cu U �- ' �- CL ° tn ... N U c U � i.. � N 1._ C � (L) Co LJ v "� cu O ca c) cv -g `� v �.� 0_0 N C tn a) C N p a) U L a_ - 4- C y �.. 4- N i cu • +� cu `L tn C c cu N CY3 cn >• 4- • N �" O = O , c6 N a) U N a) " vi • (n a) . "_' O �. �„ Co CL cu C U Cu CL N N V U C N .0 ;� C = N ® E .0 C U N U= . N C . C a) .— .0 a) C m ' e.l — cam.. 'Z7 CIO U cu co O U = Q) l- 'p cu a) O C '� vi ON U • C77 N C tn cn i y cu 0 v cu 0 O O 'S tn p u C '+,, • - cu 4-- -0 U - 0 > F" +-+ U . —_ N cu cu U ' U -C C • E L CM M W ui cu to O L Cn '+:, 0 (/ '''' ca ay O 0 (> O C• . O U T3 cu " ' - 4-- (-+!, �' �. = U C cc L -a �a- - n c° C Cro a .> o > C a) O ca •O W U CL CZ C q X. �„ °) G a) C Q (•) co O - C c d a) U) V cn cu > —. a.) . �c +� cn Cl - O = 0 cu U L V) 'p • U . . 0 cu N i. N d) _ = L_ > CO v> a) Q 4— O U . r N C a) E s- U 4 4-- '- CL O CL CZ E w 0 ca > O . .0 � C U .n .� + a) ° cu L o - .� ° -- �' >. + r w +,, N C U C C C _ -0 C U 4- + C C tn N N C- O �. •? O E. N +-J _ v� p E CL U c C W . > O C , Vf C . U ' .�.. a) O +� cu C 0 E C2. cn L C al . C U cl7 C +�, U L O .. N U `+ : Cn ( . n i S2 O a) - 0 U> O a) C `n C L a)- O g. U C L '0 O rn C O C , U •• C' C ♦o C 4-• C •+;, L — C: - m co • C L vs O 4 - • N C s • C O 0 a -'i a ° >,. �„ a) Q a, �' _ CO p 'ti v, LL1 O N �} C ,__ a) CM L J :t U) D . C2. O O C: _ �-• 2 ° �.- O E. • S o cz �-- o C1 C2. TO: Cit Mana FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Condor Storm Sewer (Project 78-18) DATE: Februar 14, 1980 The public hearin for this project was held Januar 17, 19800. At that time, the Council continued the heari to .Februar 21 so that staff 'could meet with and evaluate. -comments 'presented- b certain interested propert 'owners, On Februar 7, staff met with representatives of Marvin Anderson Construction Compan In addition, a meetin has been scheduled for Februar 20 w ith representatives o f Condor Corporation. A second informational session was conducted for all -interested. propert owners on Februar 12, Attached is previousl submitted information concernin the project. Council members have previousl received copies of the fe stud e, t TO: Cit Mana FROM: Assistan*t Cit En SUBJECT:. Condor Storm Sewer P'ublic Hearin (Maplewood Project 78-18) DATE: Januar 10, 1980 A Public Hearin is scheduled for 7:45-P.M.., Januar 17, 1980 for the above pro Attached is previousl submitted information.-about the pro Council has previousl received the feasibilit report* D " MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Public Works - SUBJECT: Feasibility Study - Condor Storm Sewer - Maplewood Project 78--18 DATE: November 29, 1979 A number of drainage problems are present in the study area for this project. As a result, the directed to study the entire situation and develop a plan to bring .the area's storm drainage system back into conformance with the City's 'drainage plan. - The consultants have made a number of recommendations as detailed in the enclosed report. Some of the recommended facilities. would be installed as part o,f . a public improvement project while others would be installed by developers as part of their utility systems The attached map shows the recommended improvements and indicates who will construct the various facilities. The following .are those improvements r :ecommended to be part of a public improvement project, 1. Construct storm sewer, from the Maplewood -Hills Townhouses experiencing flooding adjacent to Dorland Road to Londin Lane Pond (Section A, S.E.H. report) at a total estimated project cost of $34,470.00. 20 Repair and eliminate further erosion damage adjacent to the Connemara Apartments (Condor Corporation) by installing a storm sewer outlet from-the Londin - Lane Pond to the existing siltation basin adjacent to Johnson's Pond at a total estimated project cost of $32,735 3. Construct the Fire House Pond, inlet.storm sewer from. Crestview Pond and outlet storm sewer to the Connemara site, at a total estimated project cost of $147,050.00. 40, Construct relief lateral storm sewers adjacent to Dorland Road (Sections B & C. S .E.H. report) at a total estimated cost of $33,470.00 and $13,415.00 respectively. Parts I and 4 are recommended to be constructed by the City with the condition that the owner of the ��taplewood Hills Townhouses pay the entire cost of the improvements attributable to his property. r Part 2, storm outlet from Londin .Lane Pond west of Connemara and Part 3, Firehouse. Pond with inlet and outlet piping are proposed to be assessed. The service area contains a number. of different assessment situations. Some areas were previously assessed, some is City owned, other areas have been provided with a certain amount of storm sewer facilities by. developers. These factors should be considered in developing an assessment formula It is recommended that the attached resolution calling for a public hearing January 17. 1980 be adopted by the Council. The. State Statutes Section 4.62.356 subdivision 2 addresses the question of Planning Commission review - for. proposed public improvements to investigate their impact on the Comprehensive Plan. The statute further states ..... "The governing body may, . by resolution adopted by two -- thirds vote dispense with the requirements of this subdivision when in its judgment it finds that the proposed. acquisition or disposal of real property or capital improvement has no relationship to the comprehensive municipal plan" . It is recommended that the City Council adopt a second resolution finding this proposed project has no impact on the Comprehensive.Plan. o► To be built by City of Maplewood MAPLEWOOD o f • o J cc O 0 `1 MAILAND R 1 . To be built by Connemara Project Built by Crestwood KnolIs [•. re F�l k E. E U DRAINAGE PLAN To be built by City of Mople pod Built b y CresttiV1=1W • •' = • , � -ice •• �••...� •. � • �� d • Te•wLr►aLaa • t , RESERVED. 'FOR PARK N �� - 1 �_•� O _. ~• 1.�_ - .4N - I�• • •Y •.e.. • r� .,mo J I J �,j C 44 ... ►. � ! � ytT Dom' • • • . !`P►e�R Tlr1 JA C • T T or ••n pt t t 6v" IT Nei 6 6 AV .. 2 •- d' c AR • l r 1 gi ` may - : do 1w) r le cc js PO NO so- p e mc IL 6 2 2 • K • t •.•.. i� --- ---.._ _ • j 3 -• - -- IL •: r .� ROAD 1 i ' �'� o s • • ; , 41 4_ .. •/ j m • a • •� o . - .... • Cage memo • � •� Sig �40 �• . ..•_ a . • - A J T' � �t it • � y �� • 4v • j, �- •,. . • y • a r • l a... rtau ON t •. . •jam. - « r s . � y A N ANLA rd-f� hd-i - -- - - • .. _,x..'11►} RQa - -- - r 1 •!.r � Nt Mr • PREVIQ ASSESSED AREAS 1 ' r*?At If &L&a. • , • • , . RESERVED FOR PARK SO etfts 1 I 3 ' fr � � N •. ; • 1`. �� 1 . . .� • � �- by 1. .• \- .... -� \ 1 '- ''. � "-- � �•.T f�,� • 7rt•• • Ial Kam►.• . . �r Il.11w • ,•...: �' �T hoc � 1'r°"ii c.t- , � � 1 16) C11 tit o,o CITY sf .uita lS0000 -• - ------ r- ©1 -- - -- -___ _ _ '0 41L 44 V I ! A . 1 •� 1 t t Its / G••{ • • _ �•� Sa Q- • • • N oft 3 rr b �r� jiv -th tyt7' 1" • C • 1 .j, 10 •j s aa.a. • /T •i ; 1 u ' f , T- ------- ---------- `1'x'"'1 , , r, 1 . A, a • VI 2 Z ! t I 1 i ! �,_t 1� 4 1�e 1T . r , 1 '•. �L� L V I '' '' 1 ' , A I I ' r 1 1: Tl ! ! ; 1 L •• •js s • • 1 i lI i I1 . a..t7 • • 1 I 1 .II!{I i'1 ! �, !!!I! i {!tiit f !., ,� ..�. /1 �► I� a ' 111 If I it 1 11 I I 1 1! 11 'ill i .t ., i 1 1 1 1 1 11 `,. v t •• i t I { ! t! I I!! 1, _ I I 11 (i';ti 11 I 1 , t' • I�y, ,! t. . 1 tK�, +�+ - • • •� , is 1!!�1�!1 !11! 1 i - 1 ! ! I��. it ,..,._I :d _. --_ .._ .. -•- - ... - .LSD 11 iI1, i 111 +•yti! 1 , 1 + �, i ' j 1 11, tr l 1I It, • �• •-- •�_►•.w•.�...� .....�. f r , +i.;•:1.1111fI t 1.. - II .ti • !I:1 , !� t 1;ir' V j • .• t , -�.+� � • • i I I I ! f I 1 1 ,,�� � r t>Hi c•acat II ' • j , � ( I ,! {�y I ! i!ttif !�I�tl,(i �• � too- �.>�k ,14,4 - • -s'm -- -- �� _ ..... ROAD —; _ I$ _ e. e o O - _ _ •7 D .. t o♦• .. a a• ,..• `- 'r_4 �. -,..+s - tctlktt�lKl_ -. : -_ •• •- 1 1� 09 1 • 1 • I' 1.' E L Y ' • f _ +•s•a 4 i ts. I I I I I VIA , I I r LONDI LANE STORM SEINER MAILAND ROACH STOR SEWER 72-23 76 -7 .. • Al RESERVED FOR ' PARK •( `� 77 •' • 111 f -- '~=% j to • :.. � / �. - 1 �� ,. __.,� , • tee t3 ' t• Col h- c- c—.. C01 INI D 01ON-04% GOR Ah 1 -r r .J• o 10 14 >�t• ,.� CONN�.►� ?� , oil 11,011 619..6 J s .• �' . s r. f •- • - r - 1 ;L "- ^�..�!•"':��_::..t. 1s +c ( � is IL 13 if V, l Je •t r � v , 16 if �+1�'QO',;;� „_ r,,• aJs t •+� N I T ONTO REW z x+18 1 •. . jt a. , ♦ �+. x� • i � t� (c i f % ” �!C r ' i �.� • •� raw d 171 ILL % 1 � O 'R OAD L. i 1 2m at t4AA •►►�- 'Z � J.b -� •__ _- �- o • "�. .pie ��- - _���:�1K�`'- •_1 -- •• -- -- -- - .. 10 rf •t_ �o •• FINANCING SUMMARY CONDOR STORM SEWER. ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS • Part 1 and 4 $ 81, 35 5.00 * . ' Part 2'-and 3 $ 179, 785 .00 . Total' . $ 261, 140.40 To be constructed upon receiving guarantees that the Maplewood. Hills Townhouses pay their attributable share of project.. - POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT REVENUES Total Previous Potential Potential , Location Area Assess. Assess, Area Rate Assess. Amount A -- Condor 1, 132,000 241 300 890,700 0.09 $ 80, B -- City BUDGET AMOUNT FIRE STATION PROJECT $ 30,3 C -- Crestview I & II 1 -- 0 - 1, 218,800 0.045 $ 54, 800 D -- Crestview III 1, 698, 800 724,900 973 0.045 $ 43, 800 E -- Maplewood Hills 905,9W - 0 -- 905, 900 0.09 $ 81,500 F -- Crestview (future) 550, 000 -- 0 -- 550, o00 0.045 $ 24,800 G - 744,000 589 3 000 155,000 0.045 $ 7, TOTAL $322,100 'fi i s .. t • • , , tom`• CITY O:F' MApj" E, W001D 1 902 EAST COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA SS 109 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS .770 -4550 February 6, 1980 Dear Property owner On January. 17, 19.80 a Public Hearing was held for the ro os d p p e Condor Storm Sewer,, Maplewood Project 78- -18. The City ouncil did not to ' y take action on the proposal and continued the hearing. until a later date All those who wish to express their opinion' the City Council. are . encouraged to attend this meeting The time and location is: PUBLIC HEARING (continued). 7:30 P . M. , February 21, 1980 Maplewood City Hall,- 1380 Frost Avenue In preparation for the Public Hearir.� , One En ineerin staff wi g g ll Bold another information session for those interested in learning more about the proposed project If you have ques concerning the proposed constructi ho it aff ects your property or the costs involved,. please make plans to attend the • in.f orma tion session. The time and location is I NF ORIIAT I ON SESSION 2:30 P.M, until 6:30 P.M., February.. 12, 1980 East County Line Fire Station 1177• No. Century Avenue (Century at Maryland) The format for the Information Session will be informal. Interested* persons e p e ons may come during the. designated time and have their questions about the project answered* on an individual basis . Please keep in mind that no decisions will be made at the Information Session; however, you are encourag to attend to gain a better understanding of the -proj e'ct. It is hoped that this P rocess will result in a more organized Public Hearing with the City Council because only . Y relevant and valid issues will be discussed. KGH: o Very truly yours, 44A. Kenneth G. Raider ,Assistant City Engineer • _ . -... .. ., .. - .• .. • •�- .. . .. ... . . • .... .. ' .. -. ... .•. y. ..... � -.. ,- • • .. ..... ... •NHL � 4 ... 0' C (D N FJ 0 R . Cc 1-1 A N i-J A N 0, C 0 F-4 14.0 f t ATTORNLY5 AT L.AW S U I Y C 0 0 0 f*n* IficK. W. I tic) 6, 4 A r� J r_ A ;'V-'& L I r. 14 ro .74n L. L r- 11 W THIRTY-EIGHTH: FLOon, t D S TOWER PA A fo A. K C 1010 PENN' SYLVAN IA AV N. %v. WASHINGto". D.C. zoo(:) 0 M A r, L 1*.. P-4 C C) U r4 C . 1 : i�CA7n E) L. P 00 SOUTH EIGHI'H ST REET A (202 705-(3700 $ .0.CP4k1-_%T1AN*30N,J R. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 PATRICK J. O•CONNOR C #4 A it L C 4_', 0. F'A r Cy R E: . fnAPI K J. WA LZ it. D 0 lil 5 r- Y WILLIAM T. HANNAN'S EDWARD W. BROOKE • * A fA r. ra A. Pq.c) r r v H C A ((312) 341- 31300:. 001i-:�,LA5 M. MCM4LLAN JOHN J. FLYNN H. ROBERT HALPE-R•• JOSEPH C.DILLON CHAPLES D.RF-fTE TELEX 2 0-058-4 WILLIAM R. MCC9RAt4tN THOMAS H.QuaNN - HOWARD G F*ELDMAt4 C. WALTEF4 TELECOPIER 612 .341-3800(256) DAVID R. MCLIN.COF'F* YE • 4 T f_RICHEY jAME: 5-07iS nEYER DELANCEY. W. DAVI!'.- • RICHARO G. MO�F?G_AN- joHn J. SOMMERVILLE jAw.CS A. RU0ENSTLIN NANCY V.-FOWLFR PAS E-0 VE LA CAST ELLANA, 8 DAVID BURLINGAME& PHILIP Re HOCH13EPOs, THOMAS V. VAKEnIC-A DOUGLAS M. CARNIVALa j -­A.H J. K EARNEY MADRID 1, SPAIN MARTIN M. BERLIN ERIK TERENCE P. DOYLE- I R. SHERAN JOHN A... BURTON,JR. 0 1 RE A.KEARNS* 14 0 P E S. VO S7 ER • BF41A , N P. PHELAN • noer_nT A.DRUNIG TELEX 23802.FALW Ee SUITE 1100 SECURITY LIFE BUILDING THOMAS R.JOLLY• FRCUERIC11% V4- MORRIS 1616 GLENARM PLACE WILLIAM E. FLYNN BARRY J. CUTLER a MICHAEL J CONLON a PAUDOLPH J. MAYER DENVER,COLORADO 80202 DONALD S. ARBOUR& (303) 573-7737 PETER C. KISSEL• WILLIAM C. KELLY (1918-1970) CAROL N. PARK JOSEPH E. PA-rT150N a CHARLES W. GARRIS LOCAL COUNSEL* dt GORDON K. GAYErts r.JAVIER rABREGAT* L 'Januar 17, 1980 ROBERT J. STEELE: • CHRISTINA W. MICHAEL E.VEVE- MARTHA PRIDDY PATTERSON JAMES H.HOLT& or courd5r_L JOSEPH F. CASTIELLO • T FRED D. HOmPSON. JOHN He HOLLOMAN =A WNC>T MEMBER or -and Ci Council t Ma L Ci of M 1380 E'rost-Avenue Map 1 ewo o d,,. 'Mil n so to 55109 Re Condor Storm Sewer Proposed Improvement Project 78-18 Ladies and Gentlemen: We represent Condor-Corporation, the. developer of the C condominiums- in Maplewood, Condor has received the Notice of Public Hearin scheduled for this evenin re the above project, and will be represented at the hearin In addition, Condor has received a cop o the F e a sibilit y . Report dated November. -27, 1.979 on the pro- posed improvement prepared b Slaort-Ellio.tt-Hendrickson, Inc., con.Zretained tinq en retained b the Cit We have reviewed the report with Condor, and make the followin comments in its behalf We re that th'J_"s letter be. included as part o.f the record- made at the public hearing. 1 s 1 Mayor and City Counc U Page 2 ' ianuary 1.7 , 1980 . The Cause of the.: Existing Drainage Problems on the Condor Site Initially l we note Condor's full agreement with what we believe to be a s igni f icarit unstated pre- mise of the engineer's report as it relates to the Condor property, namely, that the existing erosion and siltation pond conditions in the westerly portion of the - site are not of Condors making. The probl.etns «hick exist on the site, including the erosion, the deteriora- tion of that pare of Johnson's Pond located • on the site. (a problem not acknowledged in the report) and the condition of the existing si.lta tion basin. adjacent to what is left. of Johnson' s Pond, are primarily attri- butable to the development of the property south of Lon.din. Lane. That development, as the report . does indicate, has proceeded in repeated substantial "de-- viations" from the area drainage plan previously' -ap-- proved, resu.lti.ng in runoff rates onto 'and through the _ Connemara site far in excess of those contemplated in the existin.g plan, and even. farther ..in excess of the runoff rates whi.cn existed when the area south of Londin Lane was 'in an undeveloped state. - It is important that the. members of the Coun-- c-il and the City staff bear these facts in mind, not only in connection with their consideration of the proposed storm sewer project, but also whin• the time comes to assess the costs of the improvements, as finally determined, against the. land "benefited" by them. Thee basic improvements a -re clearly intended to, and will, inure primarily to the benefit of the land south of Londin Lane, not the Condor site. ° Condor's Cooperation in Completing the Project Next, we wish to assure you that Condor fully intends to cooperate with the City in effectuating the basic improvements, consistent with i is commitments to the City uridr the existing planned. unit development ( "PUD") and. related contractual. arrangements., Ma le nd City Counc :Z. Page 3 Ja-nuary 17, 1980 To the extent that ..the proposed improvements seek cons ide'rati_on from Cond:or beyond the scope. of its prior commitme- nts , ho�,7ever , Condor expects f air con-- side.rat.ion or compensation in return: Condor's' Prior Commitments . As you. will recall,. the PUD for the Condor site was approved by the Council on `Dec ember 21 , 19724D. The approval was -subject to a nuMber of. conditions , including conditions relating to the regulation of in-- ternal storm drainage waters and siltaation' control o -f drainage into Johnson's Pond,.' It also contemplated. 'negotat.Ed easements for public utility routes and areas that would need to cross through the site serving other adjacent areas," More recently., on May 11, 197.8'. the 'Council approved the building and site plan for Connemara lI that is, Phase II of the PUD, again subject to * certain conditions. one of the conditions concerned. Condor's compliance with a grading and drainage p3 an submitted on May 1, 1978, as modified to conform to certain recom- mendations of the :. soil Conservation service. Another. concerned the provision of a $751000 Peri ormanc -e bond to insure compliance with the grading plan. [The latter condition was. amended by negotiation to .provide for a $30, 000 letter, of credit in -lieu'' of the performance bond Under-,. still another condition, Condor was to dedicate certain easements to the City, i.n.cluding a. 20 - foot storm sewer easement "along the drainage channel" on the westerly part of its site.; a flowage easement around that part of Johnson's . Pond located on Condor's property; and a ponding easement' for a siltation pond to be located to the east of Johnson's Pond. The -latter easements generally anticipated the improvement project presently under consideration. The proposal outlined in the engineer's -report, however, differs in several material respects from Condor ' s understanding of the project as initial-ly. contemplated, and is likewise incons i s tent with Condor's existing 'commitments f or drainage'and ponding. easements . Mayor and C i. t.y Co uz_1C1 l Page 4 January 1.7, 1980- Departures .980 Departures in the Project r -as Proposed -froln Condor'. - Existing Commitments : 1. Location of the . Londi.n Lane Pana Outlet . Storm Sewer, First, as -outlined'-in the. engineer's report, the proposed Londin. Lane Pond Outs_ et ,*S torm Sewer line does not proceed "along the drainage channel" on the Condor site, in .accordance with Condor's understanding- and nderstand.ingand its conunitment to provide the necessary easement, instead, the proposed sewer line proceeds more or less directly along the westerly. boundary of the Condor s i.te to John son's Pond, 2. Locution - o.f ...the Siltation Pond. Second, the proposed sewer .ine . do -es not discharge into a siltation pond east of Johnson's Pond in the Location shown on Condor'slams for such a pond as prev_.ous1y submitted to the City, and in accordance with Condor's coi men to provide a ponding -easement, . P g Instead., the proposed l ine -eci existing salCation basin w�ichhas been created through erosion caused, and silt carried, by - excess runoff from the property south of Londi_n - Lane . 3. Failure to provide for the reservation of Johnson's .Pond . Third, . the existing siltation basin occupies an area f p formerly. occupied by a portion of Johnson's Pond, which has deteriorated significantly in the un-- . controlled drainage process. It has allays been Con'dor's understandingthat the res - � restoration of Johnson s Pond would necessarily be included in whatever solution was proposed for the problems which developed from the excess runoffs south - of Londin Lane Condor ha. s n-evor consented to the deterioration_ of that portion of the pond located on its • Mayor. and City .Council. Page 5 January 17, 1980.. Property,,- except as a temporary- condition to be cor- rected when the City's drainage plans for th.e. area were finalized. 49 Desiltaton of Runoff from Adjoininq* Proprt L The final two points are principally matters of necessary clarification . It is not clear from the engineer's report whether the d.es it ration pond on-Condor's property is _ intended to serve as such with respect to. internal stormwa.ter drainage only, or also as . a desil tati.on vehicle for drainage waters from outside the site, specifically, for . drainage , from the Lond:in Lane.-Pond and the Fare House Pond . It has always been Condor's understanding and . intention that its proposed des it ration pond would serve as such only with respect to internal drainage on its own _ site, - 50 Runoff from Fire House Site. Finally, we note that the peak discharge rate from the Crestview Pond to the Fare House Pond. is pro-- posed to be increased by five and one----half times the. rate shown in the drainage plan previously approved. The correspondingly increased capacity of the Fire House Pond, as proposed, may permit the discharge rate to.the Condor site to r'ema in at the level shown in the approved plan. That level, in turn, would appear to be tolerable at this time. Again, however, it is im- portant that discharge to the Condor. ' site from the east not be. increased beyond the rate initially contemplated, and -khat desaltation occur prior to the discharge. De8iltatio.n is particularly important, with respect to the discharge from the Fire House Pond, in that the flowage across the Condor site, assiuning the completion. of Phases XII and Iv of the PUD, will ultimately pass through. two additionalponds on the sate, prima.ri.l.y aesthetic in character. W-Ayor and. City Council P.ag e G j nuary 17, 1980 Suggested Modifications -in Project as Proposed In swranary, Condor is not committed to pro- viding either storm sewer. or ponding easements as pre- sently proposed. To. accommodate the completion. of ` this impor-- tant drainage work., Condor suggests that the pr_oposod pz~o j ect be �nodif-ied as follows . In essence, the proposed storm sewer prof ect should be modified by returning it to its original conception, as Condor has always understood it That would involve (1) the r_ estora pion of that portion of Johnson's -Pond located on the Condor site, as part of the proposed imDrovemen.t.; (2)the relocation of the siltation pond to the. location sho%.2-n on Condor's pre-- vious site plans; and (3) rerouting the proposed storm.- sewer line along the existing drainage channel, so that i.t discharges to the siltation pond, as relocated. 10 Restoration of Johnson's Pond. The pond should be restored to the- condition, or -con.f iguration, existing when Condor acquired the property, and . the restoration should be accomplished in the context of the project presently proposed. 2e Relocation -of the siltation pond Next, the siltation pond should be relocated east of Johnson's Pond, approximately 100 feet east of the siltation pond shown in the engineer's report, Condor has consistently shown the pond on its plans as being located at the head .of the drainage channel. 3. Relocation of the storm sewer line . The storm sewer line should be routed along the existing drainage channel to the siltation pond, as relocated. That was the route previously contemplated by -the City, and agreed to by Condor* In that regard, in the context of grading activity which occurred on the. Connemara TI site this y.l Mayor and City Counc �l. PagO7 January 17, 1980 pa �- -� s unzzne r Condor refrained from filling and grading � f -e dr aina e channel , even. though. the f ilk. material. was th g • t in order to fac.i.l.itate the City's available to .� , constructionof the sewer 1 ine along 'the channel.. herefore f even .i.f the drainage channel route is not . -� should be brought to employed r. the drainage channel shot g grade as art of the. proposed 'improvement. In any g � r - ��r.hatver the route of the sewer line , the line et en r d disch.r e Jnto the siltation pond, as relocated* h. sou]. g - conclusion Condor requests, that the, City In cone , e cans ideration to modif c a t.i.ons of the proposed _ giv , rove:nent project as stated, and that the public 3-mp p a portions of the project discussed hearing an those d i p t _ his letter be continued far Further hearing following such consideration e Condor is prepared to meet with the Cit staff and its consulting engineers to discuss p p the proposed modif i.cati.ons I at their convenience. Respectfully submitted, Frank J, W2 F Jif' : emw . cc: Mr. James Re Riley Mr . John J. Smuda Mr. John F. Bannig.an r Jr., . when the City staff and its consultants con-- Subsequently, c].uded to reroute the.. proposed sewer line, the staff asserted that Condor was in default in the performance of its grading - P lan for Connemara II, principally because the drainage channel had not been brought to final grade. The resolution at that matter has been deferred., at least temporarily, pend-- ing the : Council''' s decision on the current proposal. ft PATF41CK J. O'CONNOR F.REUCNICK W. 1►IOMA✓ :roc A. WALT EF+s THOMAS A. KELLER .III MIGHAtL E MCGUIRE RtCHAR.D L. POST KENNEIN O.-IONES.JR. ROBERT J. C""157IAN50N.JR. CHARLES H. FAEORE f RANK J. WALZ JAMES R. DORSEY ANDREW .J. S"EA DOUGLAS M. MCMILLAN CHARLES D. REITC WILLIAM R. MC GRAN N WALTER C. PARKINS KENT E..RICHEY JAMES OTIS REYER JOHN J. SOMMERVILLE JAMES A. RU13ENSTCIN NANCY .F. FOWLER JEREMIAH J. KEARNEY THOMAS R. SHERAN JOHN A. BURTON..JR. ROBERT A. BR.UNIG FREDERICK W. MORRIS WILLIAM E. FLYNN RANDOLPH J. MAYER. WILLIAM C. KELLY (1918-1970) LOCAL COUNSEL•* F. JAVIER FABREGAT * O'CONNOR NANNAN ATTORNEYS AT LAW THIRTY-EIGHTH FLOOR.'I D 5 TOWER 810 5ULIT H EIGHTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 (612) 3.41-3800 TELEX 29-0584 TELECOPIER 612.341-3800(256) PASEO DE LA CASTELLANA..8 DAVID BURLINGAME * MADRID 1• SPAIN MARTIN M. BERLINER* 276=5524 GREGORY A. KEARNS * TELEX 23.802 FALW E_* SUITE 1100 SECURITY LIFE BUILDING 1615 GLENARM PLACE DENVER, COLORADO 80202 • (303) 573-7737 January 21, 1980 Mayor and City Council City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Re: Condor Storm Sewer . Proposed Improvement Project 78--18 Ladies and Gentlemen: SUITE 800 1.919 PENNSYLVANIA AVE.N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 (202) 785-8700 PATRICK J.O'CONNOR WILLIAM T. MANNAN* EDWARD W. BROOKE • JOHN J. FLYNN H. ROBERT HALPER JOSEPH E.DILLON THOMAS H.QUINN HOWARD G. FELDMAN * DAVID R. MELINCOFF* DELANCEY W. DAVIS*. RICHARD G, MORGAN PHILIP R. HOCHBERG THOMAS V. VAKERICS DOUGLAS M. CARNIVAL* TE'RENCE P. BOYLE*. HOPE S. FOSTER* BRIAN P. PHELAN * THOMAS R.JOLL.Y*. BARRY J. CUTLER MICHAEL J. CONLONa DONALD S. ARBOUR PETER C. KISSEL* CAROL N. PARK * JOSEPH E. PA.TTISON = CHARLES W. GARRISON" GORDON K. GAYER* ROBERT J. STEELE * CHRISTINA W. FLEPS* MICHAEL E. VEVE * MARTHA PRIDDY PATTERSON= JAMES H. HOLT • OF COUNSEL JOSEPH F. CASTIELLO = FRED D. THOMFSON- JOHN H. HOLLOMAN Ma *NOT MEMBER OP MtNNESOTA BAR Please refer to my letter of January 17, 1980 regarding the above project. During the course of 'the consulting engineer's presentation at the public hearing on.that date, our client,. Condor Corporation., and we learned for the first time -that the total estimated costs of the various aspects of the project, approximately $290,000, are proposed osed to be spread on an. area -wide basis; that vir- tually the entire Condor. PUD site is included within the area . proposed to be assessed; and that the assessments are proposed to be spread at approximately 9¢ per square foot* Insofar as the unimproved acreage comprising Phases III and IV of the approved Condor PUD are con-- cerned, that is, the northerly .portion of the site, it is incredible to us that such property is propo assessed in any amount, for any portion of the rp�q,e. improvements. We defy anyone to. establish that erty stands to benefit in -any. respect from � he ;�.;; r. prop � � n improvements contemplated , or that it contribute �;;r1-�i a., ,� p v�;1" _ way to the drainage problems proposed to be so1.v ,- cn D , oc;.�r � _ A i .S tx Rec. 4 Dil. cif �? _ Dir. d �=«�. �cf Qty, ,.�`. cl N .. / .. In-urznce 0th^r -. .______........ A Ma or and city council . y Page 2 January 21, 1980 T.he same is true of the Connemara II site, the single qualification that it may arguably with g • minor extent from that portion of the.. benefit to a m Londin Lane Pond- outlet Storm Sewer line which will receive storm water f rom a portion of the Connemara IY site. Even. if the latter were true, however, then at best the Londin Lane Pond outlet Storm Sewer improvement should be assessed and spread separately, without ref- erence to the other separate improvements included.in the overall: project* In short our client does not intend to par-- - I raina tic i ate in the costs of curing the drainage ailments of g P the area south of Londin Lane. and to. meeting We look forward g with the consulting 'er and Cit staff, as suggested by there when the engine y cerin s continued.. More importantly, we look public hearing wa _. d to a more .sensible approach by , the City and. its forwar representatives to this entire matter. Respectfully submitted, Frank J. Walz FJw:emw cc: Short--Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc.. Mr. James R. Riley Mr. John J. Smuda .,i U i� PATRICK .1. O•CONNOR .F.REVERICK W. THOMAS JOE A.WALTERS �•k TO.40MAS A. KE•LLER rM.. MICHAEL E. McGUIRE -RICHARD L. POST KEN14E7H p.JONES.JR. ROBERT J.CHRISTIANSON,JR. CHARLES 8. FA FGRE FRANK J. WALZ JAME.S R. DORSEY - ANDREW! J. SHEA DOUGLAS M. MCMILLAN CHARLES D. REITE WILLIAM R. MCGRANN WALTER C. PARKINS KENT E. RICHEY JAMES OTIS REYER JOH14 J. SOMMERVILLE JAMES A..RUBENSTEIN NANCY t. FOWLER JEREMIAH J. KEARNEY THOMAS R. SHERAN JOHN A. BURTON,JR. ROBERT A. BRUNIG FREDERICK W. MORRIS WILLIAM E. FLYN N RANDO.LPH J. MAYER WILLIAM C. KELLY (1918-1-970) LOCAL COUNS.EL•• F. JAVIER FA•BREGAT* o*CON N 0 R ..HAN NAN ATTORNEYS AT LAW . sUrrt- eo-o 1919 PENNSYLVANIA AVE.N.W. THIRTY=EIG.HTH FLOORS i D S TOWER WASHIN G'tON. D.C. 200045 So SOUTH EIGHTH STREET..(202) 7a5-8700 MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55442 'PATRICk J.000NNO'R- WILLIAM.T.•HA:NNAN ■ ---'- EDWARD W. BROOKE • JOHN J. FLYNN' (612) 341-3800 H. ROBERT HALPER * JOSEPH E. DILLON TELEX 29-0584 THOMAS H.QUINN * HOWARD G._FELDMAN* TELECOPIER 612 341-3800(256) DAV10 R. MELINCOFF* DE•LANCEY W. DAVIS* RICHARD G. MORGAN PHILIP R. HOCHBERG PAS EO DE LA CASTELLANA.8 DAViD BURLINGAME* THOMAS V. VAKER{CS* .DOUGLAS M. CARNIVAL - MADRID. 1, SPAIN MARTIN M. BERLINER" TERENCE P. BOYLE* 276-5524 GREGORY A. KEAR.NS HOPE S. FOSTER*BRIAN TELEX 23802 FALW E** SUITE 1100 SECURITY LIFE BUILDING BRIAN F?, PHEt.LAN THOMAS R. JOLLY 1616 GLENARM' PLACE BARRY J. CUTLER* DENVER COLORADO 80202 MICHAEL J. CONLON * DONALD 5. ARBOURs, (3 03) 573-7737 PETER C. KISSEL* CAROL N. PARK • JOSEPH E. PATTISON • 'j (� Q /� February 4, .LJ V V GORDON K.•GAYER{•SO�` ROBERT J. STEELE CHRISTINA W. FLEPS * MICHAEL E. VEVE * MARTHA PRIDDY PATTERSON * JAMES H. HOLT • Mayor and City Council - OF. COUNSEL City Of Maplewood JOSEPH F. CASTIELLO FRED. D. THOMPSON -- JOHN JOHN H. HOLLOMAN III• 1.380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 -Nom MEMBER Or htINNESOTABAR Re: Condor Storm Sewer . Proposed Improvement Project -78-18 Ladies and Gentlemen The public hearing on the . above matter held on January l7 ,*' 1980 was continued to a later dat-e, at the request of the City ` s consulting engineers, in order to give them an opportunity to review the comments we. made in our letter dated January '17 on behalf of our client, Condor *Corporation, and to consider the comments and objections raised by a number of people at the public hearing. At the same time, the engineers indicated that it was their intention to meet with the City staff -and our client to discuss the various points being raised . To date, neither our client nor we have been contacted concerning such . a meeting Yours ver_ truly, =rcrx Cil; Claris Frank -J, Wal 3t.I•..1 1 .. • . • cc: Short -Elliott --Hendrickson, Inc. _ Mr. Geotfry Olson Mr John F . Banni an Jr. .. ,•..�.__._. _ . _.. _ Mr. James R, Riley Mr . John J. Srnuda 1•. _ _ ..�..�_ ...._.. . Transmittal Date a_XZ_ ..�...... �...,.- � .•w_.., -.... -.w_ `.. .._. r.....-.. :. ... .._...._....+..+w r.... _ . ♦ - .r.M..r .s _.,.. .- � .. .. �. _... _ ."_.-.. _...,.,.. r.�..•V . I _.. �...- • .v • .. i••� '+-wr-..,.,.... .-�-.. t^.' - 'r ♦.'... ... ._.,..,r 4L ' MEM0RANDUM TO City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Alley Vacation - LOCATION: West of Bi n,hi ngham Street and North . of Ripley Avenue APPLICANT City -of Maplewood DATE: January 10, 1980 Request Vacation of the alley west . of Birmingham Street, between Ripley Avenue and Summer Avenue. Site Description 1. Location: See Map 2. Existing Land Use:. Undeveloped alley right -of -way -being used as rear yard space for the surrounding neighborhood. There are several small storage sheds on the right-of-way ,as well as overhead power lines. Surrounding Land Uses The surrounding properties are developed with single family homes. Past Actions 12-6-790 Council approved a lot area variance for a lot abutting the subject alley and fronting on Birmingham Street (see enclosed Property Line Map). Approval was based on the following; 1. The intent of the ordinance is met, because of the undeveloped alley on the rear of the property. 2. The variance is minimal* 3. Council approved a similar variance one block north in 1978. Approval was subject to the following -conditions.: 1. No bu.i 1 di ng permit shall be issued for this lot, until the drainage problem is resolved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2. Council should initiate the vacation of the alley lying between Ripley Av.enu.e -and Summer Avenue west of Birmingham Street _1 Planning Considerations 1. + Land Use -Plan Designation: RL, Low Density Residential, 2. Zoning; R-1., Res1dence District (Single.- Dwelling) 3. Chapter 412.851 of the Minnesota State Statutes states "The Council may by resolution vacate any street, alley, public grounds, public way, or any part thereof, on its own. motion or on petition of a l majority of the owners of land abutting on the street, alley, public grounds public way, or part thereof to be vacated. When. there has been I no petition., the resolution may be adopted only by a vote of four-fifths of al 1 members of the counci 1 . No such vacation shat l be made unl ess i t appears in the interest of the public to do so after a hearing preceded _ by two weeks published and posted notice . " Public Works Considerations l . There are no in ground utilities i n . the alley right-of-way. There are overhead power lines, however, running down the center of the alley. 2. The alley is not proposed to be developed as a secondary access.. Property Taxation Considerations The vacating of the alley will not affect the taxes on the adjacent properties. Analysis . Staff does not see any reason to retain the alley right-of-way. It is evident that the -property owners abutting -it have established the use of this alley as rear yard area. Furthermore, . there is no reason for this alley to ever be developed as a secondary access. It would therefore, be in the public interest to vacate this alley for residential use. A utility easement should be retained, however, for the existing power lines i n the alley, Recommendation Approval of the proposed al..l ey vacation based on the following findings: 1 The alley vacation would be in the public's best interest. 2. The alley is presently being used for rear yard space by adjacent land .owners. 3. The alley does not serve as a secondary access to any abutting property. It does not meet the i.n tended prupose of the alley when i t was pl atted . .Approval is subject to a utility easement being retained for maintenance of the exi.sti ng overhead power lines. Enclosures 1, Location Ma p Action�r Cop unci 2. Property Line Map n d crsei r` Re j .; l e d....�.,._._...w.�.,. 2 21 t vw.-ti-.w.++ •..-i. IVT• rr/✓` Lake _ COUNTY _j KOHLIMAN AVE. W N d Q Z z Z W � En � � u Y C7 (--� ROAD a: .J ow 3:1 EDGEHILL RD. - 2 wui z 3 d Cr a J N s z DEMENT u. 1 AVE.W rte- �S a C a {BROOK ~ o J , IIv, ra) m sExT NT AVE. U�GERVAIS AVE. GERVAIS RADATL __- ii th � 65 AVE. A,F G �ANDVIEW Y- VIKING =()R. `I 0;j SHERREN---- - • COPE AVE. ! ✓ _ COPE AVE. IF ILARK"n AYE. � LARK AVE. f.:y� LARK AVE. a - .J N Q `n 2 U Q !- 25�`COUNTY�o L__�LAURIE RD. Z LAURIE R0.•. x a �. Lake.- - � z d Z ROQO a a Z /•" r W w O—� ILELAND �� IRf ZSI SANDIHURST z AVE. D1 ',7J N v O �.. z2 Q / Cr Y w o JUNCTION il A`J - v • P tr AVE. BU LRKE QVE. -- BU RKE m `. J �a NT EL.DRiDG E AVE44 W r ®SE L M Oty T AVE . w .64 > is A N AVE Q Q t o;. P. = SKS �Cn VE. v SKILL MA N m AvE. = NAR R!S SSD SHR{ IAVE. / o f ( Q� ROSE w00D AVE. o RYAN , • �v ` 5� RY LAIN�� ,tom• _ JQ � :4 CuLI 4 �Q' o_ x' a FROST c� N AvE cn rn F- v> cn 22 O J 28 50. Cr r p 27 W FE NEON AVE. d �� WS "" "'•� LWk -LO .. W a w N SU Eft C 9 uj Q FRISBIE AVE. S-/ S j G 0 . �5 a 22 R 0 � '� Vf, RtPLEY AVE. � � � � Z Ir sI � RIP �Y • Lake -�"` SO PH IA ST m - - a a o �� 29 Ki'VGST r °'y Lake 2 T sop M .a k Ph o /e n =±_ Z d .. �� �__r__ �' c c W POI ...... LA RP NTE R m - AvE ~ r r� F—n �'l f- F__� F7 F -I 1. 7/' Location Map �.. •;'•y L.11 �'' l�.. • •t � ., • t 4+a,7�pR ',c! '�0O'"•"•i'���i;•• 1 j f, � � F ��� ' ; � 'fL• ih OPT Iq -t ,. , flex r� ' ,., �� T a :! r -..w.• r.....•3, rc .rr..w+..�...�r. +. riiw•a .� r t or. S E V E.0 r7 77 4V 2- , SUBJECT ALLEY r - F�-L j RECEIVED LST AREA-'�- 3 VARIANCE 12-6-79 T \ i13 t� _ G , ! j� 13 14 a �� G ', .� + ►� � � � 1Cr� t3 trJ 2� � .� RIF- L�" 'i v .3� lots 1 r e t_ r ( (, �' i .. . 1 =F --- C►; l aw7"C �p : • ` fly, .n O t _ ~": r �""'_} ." s ► �_y.` ; L� to '; r r •-�i _ � �- .�:�g• .�� A � �,,,..1� j' .1�-�.r. ^ r r�..�•'I 1 4(,P � pis L � '�,,,�� � - r^'' � •�'. ro ME z f• ( �b� f Ar, I �_li♦ 'f�. ��4 �- ! f - t^,.t.i.X I • I • tnfffsfa• r� � • ii 1 CP S�, Z' 8 (j-. 14 t �� � � cam.. � `•- t t � '`� � � ^ � ��+ 9 �...�. ..� 041 C 22- or t ~ X .) I77 1 1 1 V7 14* Ei S E V E.0 r7 77 4V 2- , SUBJECT ALLEY r - F�-L j RECEIVED LST AREA-'�- 3 VARIANCE 12-6-79 T \ i13 t� _ G , ! j� 13 14 a �� G ', .� + ►� � � � 1Cr� t3 trJ 2� � .� RIF- L�" 'i v .3� lots 1 r e t_ r ( (, �' i .. . 1 =F --- C►; l aw7"C �p : • ` fly, .n O t _ ~": r �""'_} ." s ► �_y.` ; L� to '; r r •-�i _ � �- .�:�g• .�� A � �,,,..1� j' .1�-�.r. ^ r r�..�•'I 1 4(,P � pis L � '�,,,�� � - r^'' � •�'. ro ME z f• ( �b� f Ar, I �_li♦ 'f�. ��4 �- ! f - t^,.t.i.X I • I • tnfffsfa• r� � • ii 1 CP S�, MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Lot Split/Alley and Street Vacation LOCATION.: Birmingham and Sandhurst Avenues APPLICANT:. Ar --Mon Properties OWNER: Artisan DATE: January 16, 1980 Request The applicant is requesting a lot split and vacation. of adjoining alley and street rights-of-way to create three.lots. Site Description 1. Location: See enclosed maps 2., Lot Size: The property is irregular, approximately 2 acres in area and consists of 14 substandard lots. 3. An abandoned and substandard house and garage are on the property. Proposed Land Use 1.. Create two 82.5 by 130 foot lots to front on Birmingham Street and a third .i of to the west of approximately 400 X 130 feet. Both l ots to 'front Bi rmi ngham .. Street ' are proposed for single family use. No use was i ndiGated for th-e west- erly esterly lot. 2. The two proposed lots fronting Birmingham Street were part of the Conway Addition Preliminary Plat that was denied by Council in 1978, because of Drainage problems. 3. The alley to -the north and the easterly 240 feet .of the Sandhurst Avenue right- of-way are proposed to be. vacated. Half of each right-of-way would go to the adjacent property owners. Surrounding Land Uses North: An undeveloped alley right -of -gray. Across the alley a single family dwel. l i ng and barn zoned R-1, Resi denti al Di stri ct (Si ngl e Dwel l i ng) and pl anned for RM, .medium density residential use. East: . Birmingham Street. Across Birmingham Street a single family dwelling fronting on Sandhurst Avenue. South: The undeveloped Sandhurst Avenue right -of -gray. Across the right -of --way, a single family dwelling zoned R-1 and planned for RM. West: Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way. West of the right-of-way is the proposed English Manor Planned Unit Development. o C Past Actions le March 1978: Sandhurst Extension Feasibility Study. Engineering staff concl uded. • development of the Sandhurst right-of-way west of Birmingham would be cost: prohibitive. 2. September 18, 1978: P1 anni ng Commi ssi an review of the Conway Addition Prel imi nary Plat. Concern for a lack of adequate drainage i n . this area prompted. tabling of the item until -input was received from the City Council. 3. September 21, 1978: City Council moved to deny approval of the Conway Preliminary Plat. Planning Consi derati ons I.. The property is planned for RM, Medium Density Residential and zoned R-15 Residential District (Single Dwelling), 2. The proposed density would be significantly lower than the maximum allowable of 22 persons/net acre. 3. Section ..1005.010 of. the City Code requires a minimum l-ot dimension of 75 feet at the building set back and an area not less than 10,000 square feet for single. family lots. 4. Section 412.851. of the State Statutes requires that "...no vacation shall be made, unless it appears in the interest of the public to do so." Legal. Considerations All alleys within the developed portion of Sabin's Addition have been vacated. Environmental Considerations See the enclosed Soil Conservation Service report dated 6-15-78. This report was. ori gi nal ly prepared for the Conway Addition Prel imi nary Plat.,.. .Public works- -Considerations 1. Sanitary sewer. and water are available .i n Birmingham Street, 2. Sewer and water uti 1 i ty service have been approved for the- proposed Engl i sh Manor PUD to the west of the subject property. These services are to center on the -undeveloped Sandhurst. ri ght-of-way from Birmingham Street, west to the PUD. A 60 foot. construction easement will be required, Once construction is completed, a 30 foot utility and drainage easement should be retained. .3. No uti l i t,i es are presently buried in the rights-of-way sought for vac.at-i on. 4. Public access to the westerly lot, if and when it develops, should. be aligned to provide -future acess to the property directly north. Present access from County Road B is to the east of the platted intersection of County Road B and'.Sandhurst Avenue. 2 5. Devel opment of the westerly lot, beyond one structure should not be perm tted unti 1 a storm sewer i s available The feasibility of construct.i ng a storm sewer to serve the proposed Engl i s.h Manor PUD and County Road B is currently -.being studied by the Engineering staff. Staff anticipates. providing the City Council with their f i nd i ngs i n February . Analis i s Three issues are of importance i n ,considering the appl i cant'. s request 1. Future development of the westerly lot; 2. The City's need for a utility easement along the Sandhurst right-of-way west of Birmingham and; 3. Effects on existing drainage probl ems . Access' to the westerly lot would. have to be a private drive over the Sandhurst Avenue., -right -of -way -to County Road B. The location of the house should be subject to Staffapproval , to assure that i t- wou-1 d not interfere wi. th the future north—south street that was previously proposed in the Conway Addition. This road is needed for the future development of the westerly lot, as wel.1 as the property to the north. Once this road is constructed, the private drive to County Road B should be eliminated. The applicant. should be aware that the City's requirement of a 60 foot constructs o.n' easement -will temporarily reduce the buildable area of the southerly lot fronting Birmingham. Only 47.5 feet of the 82.5 foot frontage would be buildable prior to construction of the utilities following construction, 62.5 feet, would be . avai.l ahl e . Staff does not believe that the proposal will further intensify the ex -i sti ng drai n- age problem, due to the large area draining to the neighborhood. All applicable Soil Conservati on Servi ce recommendati ons (report dated - 6-151 78) however, shoul d be fold owed Because of the poor drainage characteristics. of the area, Staff suggests that storm sewer connection be a prerequisite to rept atti ng of the .westerly lot. Recommendati ons 1. Approval of thestreet and alley -vacations on the basis that: a. The subject alley right-of-way serves no public purpose and is in the public interest to vacate. b. Improvement of the Sandhurst right-of-way would be cost proh.i bi ti ve and i5 in the public interest to vacate. Approval . i s contingent upon. the following .a.. The . City retains a temporary 60: foot easement for the purpose of constructing water and sewer utilities. b. The City retains a permanent 30 foot easement. for drainage and uti 1 i ti es , centered on the existing Sandhurst right-of-way. 3 i o i 2.. Approval of the lot split on the basis that: • a. The lots to front on Birmingham meet frontage, area . and density requirements . for the district. b. The proposed development i s consistent with the City's -Zoning Ordinance and Land Use Plan. Approval is contingent upon: a. The abandoned structures on Lots 25 and 26 of Block 11, Sabi n' s Addition. shall -be removed before any building permits are issued.', - b. A deed restrict -ion shall be recorded with each parcel making up the westerly 1 ot. stati ng that; "O.nly,. one, -bui 1 di ng permi t shal l be i ssued for the area cans i:sti rig of Lots 1524. • a.n•d. the west 30 feet of Lot 25, Block 11 Sabin' s Addition, until this• l.a,nd* i s repl atted. The location of the structure i s to be approved .by -.•the -City. Any private, drive. to County Road B . shal 1 be rel ocated to an i nteri or street after the street i s constructed C . The.owner shall comply with all applicable recommendations of the Soil Conservation Service, dated 6-1.5-78. Enclosures: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line Map .3. Soil Conservation Service Report dated 12-15-78 ll `M .t .L �.• 1 �.f 1 n d o r Date 4 . :_...._..., _ _ _ .........._ .. :. ..... RADATZ U_. .. l!• 1.M 4r Koh Im an jr � � Q :.�• ;,� W Q KOHLMAN AVE.`� Y KOHLMANJ AVE. cr W T cn ROAD �' C, COUNTY Y IN _ _j , )aa --juj c� w EDGEHILL RD. w w z a I U � Qcr N _J J Z DEMQNT tui. AV r w a I - E-- C y' BROOKLO _ 11 th AVE 61 �' Q ca 65 Qi SEXT NT AVE. GcR1/A!S AVE. GERVAIS AVE. G tRANDV*IEW 36 VIKING OR. SMS avf ' SHERREN AVE COPE AVE. =�-= COPE AVE. ter p LARK AYE. 'n (n LA AVE. 0 LARK -AVE. a• f•- -..,.., 25) 'OrOU TY � ILAURIE_,,,.] R0. � LAURIE RO.ke Rz � ac 55 ..._. O LE �] R AN HURST t AVE. D1 r v .: z a <v/ o JUNCTION %f.. _; 4 / BU RKE AVF';> BU LRKE AYE. J O N rE ORta`# E AVE o A,• _ ,t T44 w �. AN AVE ) SELMON • � AVE. N1 64 G = SKS � v SKILL MA N m AVE. _ NAR RIS O � SK R��� � G J cr AVE i �� o AN m `t Q� ROSE WOOD AVE. RY RY aN Q IRVR. SZ • Qo P L 28 FROST c� N AVE cn w r- cn a '�'► 5 27 w FE N�T_.ON AVE. Q a CIaG;/ �-- P- W' J z � SU MM ER AV v w / �5 a N 1— w W QP 1 Q 2 -I . a a FRISBIE AVE. cr o r _3 m 5th 62 S,yoo a Q z V� R I PLEY AVE. ? '�+ Ip Y AV Wakefield a a W Ir w Lake �v� s0 PH IA ST. m o, - _ a Q a �- 29 cn KINGST N N _ r. _ Lake z _ Y SOP HIA ST. 6 Q1 z Z 3 Z IPRICE AVE= Zz__ ha/en_ �. w z PRI CE AVE GJ' �.. ,� J > a r z 62 a a Cc __ _ LA RP ENTEU - . AVE L I j 1 I 073 � I 03 U j .. f r ( I ( ► f I � ! ' -,dCI K:•. •`. �LZ _ ���'.�-. ll.�I'.•:✓.e.:+-'.. .'d'f.:.+l:.'. : i �'_u-'�t+.'.�1•y�ia!J.'.:..�L>::l.V:tlaG'a1r2.�f �:'wC+�i.,^� �— � I — -- — �...�.. — �— .._ �_ + _— —� �... i i l i `rte ' I I i 1 i i I f 1 t _ Property Line Map Ex Rights -of -Way Vacated RAMSEY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Mid-America Bank Building 1827 North Saint Poul Road Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Telephone (612).777-0127 M I N N ES OTAu SOIL allo WATER CONSERVATION.*DISTRI.CTS V1 L'y V1 1:'iU.P.lCYC'VVtat 1380 Frost Avenue St. Paul, I-A-inne sota 5 5109 Re: Flat Review of proposed Conway Addition Dear Mr. Olson: I enclose a copy of the plat review from acting District Conservationist, Stan Wendland . He concludes that there are no serious problems with this plat, and recommends approval .of the permit application if certain limitations of the soil are considered, The District concurs in the recommendations and conclusions of Vx. Wendland, and suggests approval of the plat. The District further urges that Maplewood insure that the wetland between Gervais Avenue and Clarence Street continue to serve as a stormvater ponding site on a permanent basis, Sincerely yours, William L. Donning �. Supervisor sor f P � UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE L SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE .1827 No. St. Paul Road, TAaplewood, Minnesota 55109 June 12, .1978 TO: Supervisors, Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District SUBJECT: Flat review of proposed Conn ay- Addition in 1 a.plewood I. INTRODUCTION The proposed plat is located on the north side of County Road B east of the Burlington Northern Railroad and west of Birmingham Avenue. This report evaluates existing soil and water resources; their relation to the proposed plat and offers suggestions to minimize any adverse impacts. TI. EVALUATION OF EXISTI14G RESOURCES A) Soils and Topography. The soils information presented here has limitations which should be known. The soil survey applies to a depth of 5 feet and is intended for general -planning purposes only. Before decisions are made concerning specific uses on specific sites, a professional soils engineer should be consu:Lted. The soil present in the area is somewhat excessively drained sandy loam underla'n by sands and gravel. The sandy loam surface mantle is generally 18 inches thio. The soil developed on low hills and knolls and the broad flats of collapsed outwash plains.. This soil has the following properties: Slopes range from 1% to 6% No flooding or ponding hazard - Depth to water table is greater than 6 feet -- Depth t0 bedrock is greater than 6 feet Soil strength is good Potential frost action is low Shrink -swell potential is.low Permeability is moderately rapid in the top 18 inches and rapid to very rapid below that. Vegetation is difficult to establish because of droughtiness. This . soil has good potential . for building site development . awever, the sandy nature of the soil material requires.a L few special considerations. Foundations are easily excavated but sidewall stability is poor with caving a problem. Precautionary measures should be taken. The soil is noncohesive and can develop gullies if the increased runoff from.driveways, roofs. and. streets is not handled Wisely. Revegetation for landscaping purposes can t Page2 beY ifficult, A top dressing of loamy material should be applied to ensure establishment of lawns B) water Resources No marshes exist on.the proposed plat. The water on the proposed plat concentrates in the small. depressional area outlined in blue on the map. The plat does not show how: stor.riviater surface .flows will be :handled or if any storm sewers are, planned. on the plat. ..The Maplewood Drainage Plan prepared ...by Barr Engineering indicates a stox°M sewer• system is. proposed on the north side of County Road B which. will. carry water Under the tracks then north to Cope Avenue. The runoff then travels northfrrard, after a short west jog along Cope Avenue to a proposed major ponding site located north of Gervais Avenue and west of Clarence Street, It is assumed runoff from the .plat will. enter this proposed storm sewer system where Sandhurst Court intersects County Road B and will eventually flow to the proposed ponding site between Gervais Avenue anal Clarence Street Since this is the last major ponding site. before flow enters lake Kohlman, it is an important sediment trap and will become more so as the areas around this plat become developed. III* CRITIQUE AND RECOIRAENDA.TIONS 1) Where grading for homesites exposes the subsoil, a top dressing of loam material should be applied to provide suitable soil for plant growth. 2) Care should be taken not to concentrate overland flogs before permanent vegetation is established because this soil will develop gullies quickly. If concentrations are. unavoidable, hay bales should be staked across the direction of flow. Straw mulch. should be applied. at the rate of 3,000 lb/ac. and punched in with a blunt disc over the remainder of the disturbed area until permanent vegetation is established. 3) Design measures should be taken to prevent temporary wetness problems for the house in lot 7. 4 ) The existence of the proposed ponding site between' Gervais .Avenue and Clarence Street with the storm water storage capacity recommended by Barr Engineering should be ensured. As development progresses in the area, this pond gill become an important component in maintaining the quality of storm water entering. Kohlman Lake from , the developing area. Sincerely your, Stan Wendland Soil Conservationist • i � t 1 1 { I I'i F" - 1YZii �R% `Blit _ r�Yr" 2AJ 41 ru w. • � tS taYya +t � • � � T i • ,' p•1 I•(, t,r. 1.1, 1 1. } ( , I `�� t _�.�..._.-ter _ .r.�.,._. _..r.._. 1.•�........; .......y« .. - .. ..._7. J .�_.. r/1ri%.... .�+-.•«. ! •.- ..► •. ul -\ t. ..�..._•..� ( .__ ._... .• T _r_ _ ..+..._.._....-_ •. w. _ i 4. - � t 1 ` '•t 1 .ter« �-«.,� � t • 1 1, t• , � � '•� • . 7 t! •1: 1 • / (t , •^ t ij 1 \1� J_'•,,,•_t i ! 1 � .• r I 2'.• Y f t 01 404, • yam_ �..QA,E 3t •t'tr 11 � / 1 • 1' � � s } �• • \( it 1 �� ' r' } ` t it i �� . w� j. -'"i-.._. .�L • .... t V.j 1`�: .,.+.A7 ... • ... «} e.• .r...l•.. _..t1J ?� ~ •. : •)+� 1 • ,11 ' J 1{� : ��jj� L...2 , 1 '.' . -- •' }---- '� •�` , , . 4• ......_ .:_ .._ :.J.l..e ..�. �»_,...1 � .. y� _ ....Nf>r�.•.....YIMtT�. •�..,K.. ' ' Il .• 1 // ,, ' ' j' 7 ll ••y 1. 10, ' 1 t , ` ( 1 \ 1 2 •r c - s i �/ /ice ` I ,t • '.I ( ( f . f 1 ,. 1 1 ' �,•` • 1 • 4 • r._.._ �.. tvy-f �t••-,,•i•.. •.-.�.: t••2{,j..J:••�.....�__�....1•� •,t� .. .r ���•• ,� �.. Y � .... 1 ......_....... 1 ♦.`•_ •./... .. .�..__.. .»�.._....... .. �_.�._-_ .... �` t ►.. � • + •;+! �r •/,' •C ,' ' , r�_ . • : ' ' - . L-.+.-. �••i ry•_.._r :sem..+ .+ .. �. �`;; i• , t 1 .+ `1 �.... «,_.► ...._ ....._�./ a ' 1,•' ; 1 l _ ... _ _. -_ _.. �e- �;•: --_.,1 �. �' ; ; r:���tt�;:n ,vr•rl tiC'.1 \�•• \\ ~, •~ 1 C) f:1 ,� �� ��• 1 ' 'i�l{l:r'i�ri�'i) tl•i{Y r r• '7 12 \.. J ('� • •—' ` _..f ``•\.`` ;`': :: ``••,` �: . O.S,, ., `,�•�'/') : 1 f .iI'�� '--•+i� • ! :SANDHURST. _ AVEIV .. • I Irl r'• j +� • 4 ez- A C LA.!?% k 1 `� '•r /J�� �, � • ' •� , 1`` , • : • ., i tt1 . t r r 1•�r r~ t , � ' �� • • �\ �� • 1'• I Sunvr.Yl'r) fly . • � \ \ .. (. •�{'1 � to 1,� � i�il}i} ��:� 1, ! (1 :rr �+{'+ {� f i • 1!1 T4' • \ �tl li 1 ! �A1•(' I_/\. 1� !•�•�!\. f�:•4t ''� �•, a •ice . � j 1 �� .n r \ t 7� 1? is '.'tl•;; a:l {.;1 in n': t:. c • :r'„r :t7 U 11,4 Tit- AND r•�:ir:i'iG AnCA (3'1' ,� •�\ ,'• ` � �7•,' � 1 7 :1•d�'.VI t ( I•.V r .. t � 1 j � •, t 't►1./ .i• r {/ � `• � •) :�1'.1. �) �1. i i tt t e V _ l,•:l �f:r 1 1 •\ rofvILtll �•1.•J� 1 1 / . < < J:T •!11! A) : 1 t - T y •. « ... _�• .+. •._••�_�r••_�•. _.,r ♦.r•w_Mr.•r �_r.•r.. ._.._w•rr•. _ • •. • • • • • , •_ • _ .. .. .. • • • • • _.•y •w• • .•• ..� • • • •_••_• y ••� �-• , • • '� ' i 1 i I • { Y . • 1 n. ..-.�,, 1r•1►t w•.r•rrt•Mr!r++;M'• ,•�r� �• : y-••r,i, it• •�'/'•�y��yr "• -t',t IT f'�fi• t 1*"►�iT�"rt"�p�'{+'t!'!l • ''�'+•; ++y t.� { 'i •��;!i�11tiYr1�.i•,y.MM'`t'1'11�;M'.,M'•MI>';'�`•i'�'!"•-•!t/'Af"f'_'.. _,.�t..+w,�V'.yy'{r1 ��.�.•.. Q -•M. P.`�Yw!••.N�•+F•►'T•`IM(,. . +1F �y,,...•+1•'!•Y!'At,. '� � 1 ffl�'r!',='•/%;`!`!Iii �'•�'^.'•?•/+'�'•MeV.!^•f. f'Y1M•, ,�r "^. f �Y !7?I•M!t�?•{•1��i Y07'1 ,+.�1•r'!'T `^rT!'!'y�., .1 .. i't'~ . u., :t r�l•{'f•�1/,` 1.-''y�9;`�: ,• ,t "'•1•r.•.1 1. _t.. 1' rl .el I f t'•^ r M E M O R A N D U M a J TO City Manager FROM: Di rector .of Community. Development SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat Time Extension LOCATION: English Street and County Road B APPLICANT:. Ar -Hon Properties, Inca PROJECT: English Manor DATE: February 13 1980 Request The applicant is requesting a .90 -day time extension for preliminary plat approval. Past Action 10-19- 78: Council approved the preliminary pl at, s ub ject to the fol l owi ng condi ti ons: 1. Cons t.ructi on of walkways i n the 20 foot dedicated rights-of-way and along the south side of County Road B, adjacent to . the applicant's property..,Walkway design must be constructed to standards approved by the City Engineer; 2. Implementation of the recommendations in the Soil Conservation Service report of June 16, 1978 and June 225 1978; 3. Submittal of a grading plan acceptable to the City Engineer. 4. Submittal of a. detailed 'util'ity plan indicating surer invert and proposed sewer routes to be approved .by the City Engineer* 5. The final plat shall not be approved 'unti 1 after Council consi ders . a storm water improvement project to sewer the area. If such project is denied,. applicant may provide on-site ponding that will assure no greater rate of run-off than currently exists. 6. Dedication of a ponding easement in the southeast corner of the site, to be determined by the feasibility study for the storm water improvement project.. 7. That a financial arrangement acceptable to the City Engi neer be established to pay . for any restoration needed to County Road B* -8. The final plat shall not be approved until the City- Attorney has reviewed and approved the by -.laws and rules of the proposed homeowners' -association -to assure that all . common areas will be maintained. .9. Owner and appl.i cant agree to the above conditions in writing. several of the conditions have not . been met. The grading plan and utility plan re qui red i n conditions 3 and 4 have been submitted .to th-e Engineering Department and are currently being reviewed. Condi tion #5 requi-res that the Council take action on a proposed storm water improvement project for the area before on-site ponding is allowed. The City Engineer now feels that the pond :will be required whether the improvementproject is constructed or not. He feels that the pond can be constructed to handle the water ter from the English Manor project . .A pondi ng easement required in condition #6 s ti.1 l has to be provided to the Ci ty. . A financial. arrangement still must be submitted to .the Engineer for. the restoration required in condition #7. The above items that need to be completed are pr.imari ly administrative items that can be taken care of before the final plat is signed .8- 2- 79 : Council approved the f n.al plat, with the following conditions: if That a developer's agreement is si g.ned and security agreements are provided for those improvements to be constructed after the plat is ..signed. 2. Final construction plans and specs to be approved by City Engineer. 3. .Compl i ance wi th condi ti ons 6, 7, and 8. before the plat i s signed. 4. Condition 5 is revised to allow the development of the project with on-site ponding. Since the above conditions have not been met, the. final plat approval has not become effective. Renewal of the preliminary plat approval - i s , therefore, required. 11-1-79: Council approved a 90 -day extens-i on, subject to all of the original, condi ti ons. Recommendati on ppy .royal of a 90 -da extension, subject to the original' conditions.. Approval. I s based on the fol lowi ng -findings 1. 'Council may be requiring a cash escrow forethe developer's portion of the Gl ad- stone-storm dstone storm sewer project., being considered on March 13. This could affect the financial feasibility of the English Manor project. 2. Council has approved time extensions for other plats., 3. There have been no changes, since the preliminary plat was approved, that would justify denial of the time extension. 1. Location Map 2. English manor South 3. English Manor Porth 4. Applicant's Letter (2/11/80) 2 Action by Council *1 Endor ed.�.., �• difi. ed,—...,., Re j ected.�.:,. Dato `+�t� ���► /man��.� • Y � r�✓�/moi A�/.X•../.V rV'�./ .I �' _ -v- Lake COUNTY L l 'eller Lake / J Y, O � � J KOHLMAN AVE.. o c Z Z ROAD w C Y c AVE.7I _ w I y V. G ERVI. AVE. N LARK I � LQUR.iE a z AVE. x � B U 6 K E IL AVE �' -� ►, [� R y Q: N m Q�c,4 ROSE WOOD R Y A N R. co fil- CI L Rv Q� QJ, R a z L FROST AVE cn to w co / .. A, 50° c 1-- 27 w FE NITON AVE. a a to w Q w w SU MM ER' A vLU 4 � . O P �� 1 62GO a FRiSBIE AVE. _ p �. S,y RF V a w z v j • F RiPLEY AVE. tr g Q Wakefield _jj ac w � --.Lake SO PH IA ST, ca m a Q it y --- Lake SOP Hca S T. a ,� Phalen ._.. Q D a ; �J a 7 PRI 62 `` o a w L A I IR P I E NTEU °° AVE Jr ST p, .AR -MON PROPERTIES, INC. PETITIONER TIME EXTENSION REQUEST .. �. 1. : • a •° • 1 Yds• . � �„� wmaw -UL ISH MA NOR, E -,N s U T 10 IV 04 •�• • /\ / , CMN♦r � • •�f JUT a _ t —J bal 'Mi—OW- • ® ••• .. ow"Womanow ay. mule • �• -Now. •n.•••. 1ft• 7 i ♦ i • `� . w •I�1.-q - '� ' *' • ids, Mw 61w SA&f12 doom dw 4m 4m" �•INN Y&tcte � • � � ' . t. u � e' d • R► '17 SP ,•tacit ( rsaltN ��� � j •- Ag, .�•�..�..'�. «...� - nr .rte.• I...w V z, li`i/ a ff Ar 06. ' _r • 1 35 �•rwr� �ww•r w•�•r �r •rY •. ` L •�� •� • • ••lu••.w r rr •..rw w �• � S B •YOB • • - op ° � • . � $ � �., 'fit � a ` � �„�; � d' � _ . ax ' • ' � � � • • ••� .•• � ♦ � � .,, � .... �. r � r r i •F•,• r .�+. •••. ; � rA ••r fir•• � • • ' i - ` • • • '' L asiam so AMMON 40 Vit- .«. :; � .... E ,per• • ./g� — — s - Aft k WIMP am e i • ••.••�•I.r ��•�•��••w�.wr�.w +sop 01.rrrNow r�•wr� • rr��rwr , •• ' • •• • ,.,._.1w-r...wr. `• . 1 .r • •• 1 T . ; • • - �-wr,,.►r .. i.• i ♦ ♦w+�•- ��'••♦ r , • .. • • I� ♦�i' � .. it • � ' �..> .,.M or ow f" �,, y • • •_'� • \ , .... • 1 .1 irrw ^_..__ ,.•f yt\v s•� �C�-....._S� i2.;�L ::'•�`S�SaY. -{ � • ♦ `• ,a�.�� � * • 1.-�_�rRr,w•.�1,•. i�•...6.. J11it1• I ,j�;yq �}. !y 4-Lf� r ... � i •i1•-� IP left IV -G L H MA Ivu IT 46 #✓ � y ••• r,w Ar- • • ~•"•vow+w �...,•��w� ' . } • ' ' • • • ••+ , *Aft So '. � .� w_._ r•.��•.••r•w.,_ •ice •-. �ff /Y�/ tea. � s - •� � `� •++ . .. •' r � ..� mow,.. • � ., j , 4w - � ;� .... r....� �..,, .gam•..• .r r...r ....• .. — .......r � -• M > , • � ; . , • ' tat UTA p *-•,_. • ' ..' Ir is do • � � h g � w _. •� _ _ ._ .:t ..• _ ..• ._ .� — '* •� ., � ,.•• — _. r •..• r w �...• � w ,� � rr-rww•• r _ r. �. -� �' " • • � � t. _ wow ss a rtwr- _.-•� �.t _ _....- , - _ -- i � A � 1 ! / •� .. to to Z4 21 tx • ' ' • " '� _ � � _ � _ _,� .;� __ � � �s' ,,.,,,� �s _ � rye �_ _ _ � �•- � .. _- .. Volk: •� fes` 1 •'� � 1 ,� �• ±� - � ^��•,�� 1 � .. a oo �s er a. i fuer 1 ' _ --- --' x ll.Ol !'RA'*_1 �.......,.._..—..�... •V�i,i`a.rrr.%!�[rt� �._—..—R..:7..�• ..• ...f .•ur , • M i t vfib --'y��•a�'4i 'fir rr P7 � -( rArpl►TlfM��i%l� ...._w�-•_••_••� � __�r��'�t._ .'4 ��...� � r .••. �• L '►' � • • • #, ` fit] -- .—uY0'L7A ?! [ iWltt �•ia tO.Od ` A 1 i 1 '4' i'i I • 1 • • Sol JA FEE." • -- ire' .,. �.�e� A frorr 1 �_ •''�•'_� p y »rwrl 10 ...ate__-.._..__i `�_.;• ;- cao+0 • Nv Mar Mor % :• ,,• '' -� • YT i * by • 1 q • , • ♦ - . ♦ i • • IL • � -, . � w - - --.__ r------^-_ -� i'� io^esisTs rass �"� i 1 1 � .� �• ,- .� • fA 10 B � - • II% -- _— ..w....�...r_ .�...i� rwr r.►r _r,.r ••rw.r � ♦ .n •►.. � , •• . • • � � i •SII 1R+ t � • T � Y � •. � - , , M'' .. ... � & r i. �rr Y+r�r{+�r w•.. ar••�..•,w rrr.r._a.►�•r • — ._.rww.r.r•_rr+�•w•__.a• • • � � • . ... � w - � ` � � � � .. w ' � • �r •••YEA^ Y Y tr i.,� .+.t.,' .1.. .,. , , • . • . f9� � • rr+r � .r..r � .r. .� w w .�.w �. •r wr.�..r..e• .r .� ••- •-.� r�J•—.�•rr..r r•.Jl •grin• - jrr,.ar..•.....••M►� � w w tr •• Aft-ft 40b~610 •• aw w w w w s i.w m" w w. rwr..•r.w• r w .w IN* �• r•r .... w •••• w•+•••w•..•%..af ► • iiiaaa•..r. w..� w.. ..'..: ` - K _ • M• . r � � � , j '' � . • 6c.K+••.rMl�:lrw1..�M�.l�+.il�ti.'.LA�1. yr ..._-_-..-...--........• �14������ r5�. : m,y�,,..,,,•a • _ _ i � _ � .. �u ; .•.yaf.�.'-�-_�= e.- �+ ►J....�...:.�. .... laYR . �A.. �.w%r.�Mr+A.�i•�0•iwKR�:�..5•C'. ',. �,.' •�-�.�7.�sJen•�_ .dwM1.L.�+..Y... - � .. ...... _ .. . - _ .l February.11, 1980: TO.: Jeff Olson, City of Maplewood FRI OM o T. J. A.rrigon-i. , Ar -aeon Properties, Inc,, SUBJECT.: English Manor We are herein making a request to be....on the agenda for the council meeting February 21, 1980, for the purpose ofettn g g a ninety (90).day extention on plat approval on English Manor. Due to the_extremely tight money market and unavailability of permanent financing, we have been delayed in filing our English Manor plat. ..We feel confident that we will be able to obtain said finan- cing inaneoing shortly and therefore we are requesting a ninety (90) day extention. Thank You. Sincerely, AR -MON .:PROPERTIES,, I NC . n To J. Arri'onl, President TJA/j rh k�- ..°' "a%�f`• �jj �. �'.� "� ��•3'� i4'���'"'r'�'� � �`. r f-� k�•�rF:� . ��� �'d .�sy�"� February.11, 1980: TO.: Jeff Olson, City of Maplewood FRI OM o T. J. A.rrigon-i. , Ar -aeon Properties, Inc,, SUBJECT.: English Manor We are herein making a request to be....on the agenda for the council meeting February 21, 1980, for the purpose ofettn g g a ninety (90).day extention on plat approval on English Manor. Due to the_extremely tight money market and unavailability of permanent financing, we have been delayed in filing our English Manor plat. ..We feel confident that we will be able to obtain said finan- cing inaneoing shortly and therefore we are requesting a ninety (90) day extention. Thank You. Sincerely, AR -MON .:PROPERTIES,, I NC . n To J. Arri'onl, President TJA/j rh MEMORANDUM TO: Ci ty .Manager FROM: Director of. Community Development SUBJECT Site Pevi s on Review. LOCATION: Beam Avenue, West, of White Bear Avenue APPLI CANT: Sherwin Williams Co. OWNER: Frank Husni. k and Raymond Rehbei n PROJECT: Sherwin Williams Paint Store DATE: February 14, 1980 Proposal I. Staff i s .proposing two alternatives to the applicant's original site plan. A revised site design is recommended, due to recent City Co.unci l action denying Staff's proposal for 30 foot reciprocal easements between adjacent properties. 2. Refer to the Applicant's letter and the memorandum dated January 45 1980. 1 Past-Actions 1-22-80: The Community Design Review Board approved building and site design plans for Sherwin Williams Company, with the following- condi tions: 1. There shall be . a minimum of a - fi ve foot parking lot setback from side and rear lot dines; 20 The rear elevation of the building shall. also be brick; 3. A revised landscaping plan shall be submitted. for Board` review identifying . pl*anti ng types and-sizes; 4. Applicant shall provide reciprocal easements, to be approved by the City Attorney, allowing for ingress and egress from the adjacent -properties; 5.. All rooftop and exterior building equipment shall be screened in a decorative manner. Screening. shall be subject to Staff approval; 6. The dri veway, shat l be moved westerly 10 feet to 1 i ne up wi th Beam Avenue medi a.nopeni ng. The displaced parking sta-11 shall be shifted to the east side of the relocated driveway; 7. Continuous concrete curbing shall, be provided around the entire parking lot except those areas on the "frontage road" al gnment; 8. Site -security lighting shall be provided and shall not cause any undue glare onto adjacent properties or roadways; 9. Signage wi.l 1 be reviewed separately by Staff and is not included in thi s approval 10* Approval of building des.i gn plans does not constitute approval of a bui 1 -ding,. P perms t; l i . A -trash., enclosure shall be provided if outdoor trash storage i s to be utilized. I t shall be of a masonry material., at least five .feet in hei. ht,. g and s hal l be compa ti bl e wi th the bus l di ng . Thel ocati on would be subject to .Staff approval,, 12. Two handicap parking stalls shall be provided. Each shall measure at least 12 feet in width. 13. Owner and Applicant agree to the above conditions in writing. 2-.7-80: The Applicant appealed condition number four to the City Counci l Council decided that the City woul-d not require the 30 foot "cross flow" drive aisle and., referred to the site p'la•n back to Staff for parking lot and- curb nd curb cut revisions in accordance with their decision, Alternative #1 _(Applicant's Proposal} This plan would be prefered by Staff if the "cross flow driveway" plan were . to be -implemented. Si gnat i zati on of the intersection would then be justified, since the Appl i cant`s curb cut would provide ingress and egress for a large number of businesses. Si gnat i zati on for one . business would f be much too costly. This .proposal has the obvious potential of creating hazzardous traffic condi ti ons . The uncontrol led movement of cars attempting to cross Beam. Avenue to go to and from the teal 1 as well as those trying to go west on Beam Avenue from this site, will create an increasingly more dangerous situation. These movements - do not pose a• high element of risk now, but the potential will increase sub- stanti.al ly. wi th future development along Beam Avenue. Developments such as Saint Johns Hospital and related offices and clinics are expected, as wel 1 as development on the 15 vacant lots on the south side of Beam between White Bear Avenue and Southl awn Drive, and on properties north of Beam Avenue next to the Mal 7 . Alternative #2 This proposal attempts to. prevent traffic from going west on Beam Avenue when leaving the subject property. -A driver could attempt this movement, but it would clearly be an i l legal and a hazard crea Gi ng maneuver. 0 Al ternative #3 his.. l an will prevent traffic from going west on Beam Avenue,. from the site, and will further deter traffic from attempting to enter the site when: come ng from the Mall. This plan i s the safest of all three alternatives The only problem wi th this T p . plan an s that it- reduces the number of parking spaces to 59. Sixty are.. required by Code. i ves 2 and #3 both propose closing the 30 foot "cross f low" lane which Alternatives # p p was originally planned. They also increase green areas to five feet. along the entire length of both side yards, and ten feet across the rear yard. - Analysis - Staff favors alternative number three. This plan is the safest df the three designs as previously s to ted . Staff also feels that a variance of one parking stallshould be granted . to make thisp l an work.. The alternative would -be to 'permit the parking stalls to `be nine feet wide,. but, Staff feels this would set a- bad precedent in this area. Recommendati on I. Approval of alternative number three based on the following findings: a. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relation ship to neighboring or existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that. it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that. i t wi 11 not unreasonably i nterf ere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create. traffic hazards o r .congestion . b. That the - des i n and location -of the proposed development is in keeping g with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this ordinance and the city comprehensive Municipal Plan. C.0 That the design n and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for , i is occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it i s aestheti cal ly of good composition, mater,i al s, textures .and colors. Approval i s subject to the original conditions as required by the Board, with PP J the exception of condition number four. I I . Approval of a variance of one parking space to help facilitate.- the impl emen- Pp • � f ni n tati on of alternative ternati ve number 3, and so not to set a precedent for.nine foot wide parking s tal 1 s . 3 • a } rt Enclosed 1. Applicant's Propos-al Map #1 2. Staff's Revision - Map #2 3. Staff's Revi si-on - Map #3 4. Applicant's Letter 5. Staff Report dated January 45 1980 AC Lon by C IZiC- i ected _ cam.--..�,�. Date . • K t). �r t 'r •• �tnrr a nLTAJ.V,. MAP #3. �► Yfi A t i The Honorable. John Greveau, TO. s The Cit of Maplewood-. Mayor of Y and The Members of the City Council city. of Maplewood PROM. ..Dennis D. Cavanaugh/C . G . .Rein Company n.���Tilli.ams Paint Store To Be located SUBJECT: PROPOSED Sherwi on the South Side of Bean Avenue, west of White Bear Avenue APPLICANT: The -Sher win,,Wi.11iams Company/Ce G. Rein Company • n Review Bo`a:�d bias recommended approval The Comrnun ity .Desi g ' to the following conditions: subject . five foot parking lot setback 1.. There shall . be a .mi nimum of from side and rear lot lines: 2 a The x. e ar elevation of the building shall also be brick; n plan shall be submitted for Board 3. A revised landscaping p xeve.ew identifying planting types and sizes; • 4. Applicant shall provide reciprocal eci rocal easements, to be approved • allowing for ingress and egress from the adjacent by the City Attorney, 9 properties; All rooftop and exterior building equipment shah. be � � in'a 1a dec ' orative manner . Screening shall be subject to Staff approval; wa shall be moved westerly 1.0 feet to line up 6, The driveway .� • median o engin The displaced parking s �a13 shall with Beam Avenue P g be shifted to the east side cff the relocated driveway; curbin shall be provided around the 7. Continuous concrete9 • except those areas- on the "frontage road'' alignment; entire par�ce.ng lob P •it �,i htin shall be provided and shall no -t � pause 8. site...secur y g g y g undue ..are onto adjacent properties or roadways;. axt. r 9. Signage will be reviewed separately and.. is not included in this approval,, lo. Approval of budilding . design plans does not constitute _ -approval. of a building permit; 11,e A trash enclosure shall be provided if outdoor trash .storage is to be utilized. It 'shall be of a masonry material. at least five feet in height , and shall be . compatible with the building . The location would be subject to Staff approval 3.2. .Two handicap parking stalls shall be provided. Each shall measure at Least 12 feet in width. - We are in agreement . with every requirement with the exception of Item. 4; providing for reciprocal easements for purposes of a roadway and a common point of ingress and egress for adjacent properties We hesitate to agree to the grating of the easement for the following reasons: -1. A requirement that site p 1 an and building design approval be subject to our granting of an easement for _purposes of -what is., in essence, a public roadway, is tantamount to condemnation without. compensation e We would be denied exclusive use of our property without having been duly compensated. If the City is of the opinion that this type of service road design is desirable, we would be interested in negotiating a private sale of the proposed. easement area to The City of Maplewood, who, in turn, would assume the -re sponsibility of the operation of this public roadway. 2. As owners of the property we would be. expected to maintain the easement area, to plow the snow, and to resurface, when necessary° The increased traffic resulting from a granting of this easement would Increase. the maintenance expense e The City would be requiring that an iudi.vidual property owner maintain and operate a public . roadway . 3, The -increased traffic across the easement area would also result in increased accident liability exposure e In the event of an .accident within the easement area involving traffic generated by adjacent !,, n property owers, negligence. could potentially be claimed in th.e form of unplowed snow, chuck holes, etc, We do not want to assume the additional.. liability that is inherent . in the operation,of a public roadway o We. request approval of our proposal. subject to the recommendation of the .Design Review Board, exclusive of the easement requirement- o Respectfully submitted, Dennis D. Cavanaugh., Assistant vice President Commercial Properties DDC, : j rb MEMORANDUM TO: City ..Manager FROM: Director of Community Devel;o.pment SUBJECT: Plan Review LOCATION: Beam Avenue, West of White Bear Avenue APPLICANT: Sherwin Williams Co. OWNER: Frank Husni k. and Raymond Rehbei n PROJECT: Sherwin Williams Paint Store DATE: January 411 1979 Request Approval. of plans for a Sherwin Williams Paint Store. _ Site Descri Dti on 1. Location - south side of Beam Avenue west of White Bear Avenue 2. Lot Size - 1.17 acres 3. Existing Land Usc Undeveloped Proposed Land Use 1. . The applicant i s propos i ng a 12x000 square foot one story bri ck . bui l di ng. The rear elevation, however, will be- block. 2: There will be one to two tenants along with the Sherwin Williams Company, .occupying the proposed building. 3. There are no s i de and rear - yard parki ng 1 of . setbacks proposed. -on' the south hal f of the lot. Mapl ewood' s policy is for at least a five foot parking lot setback from side and rear lot- lines for snow storage and landscaping. 4. Sixty five parking stalls are proposed. Sixty are required., Typical stall s zes are 10 x . 20 feet, which complies with Mapl ewood' s standard. Two handicap stalls are required. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Beam Avenue. Maplewood Mall Southerly: Single dwelling homes fronting .on Radatz. Avenue Easterly.: ..Undeveloped property zoned BC(M),. Business. Commercial Modified and planned for LSC, Limited Service Commercial. .Center. Westerly: Undevel oped property zoned BC(M) and planned for LSC. Past Actions Council has recently ,approved a 6 court racquetball club and a Burnet Realty office along the south side of Beam . Avenue. 4.......,_ , r r a Planning Considerations 1.Land Use Plan Designation LSC, Limited Service Commercial . Center. use p 1 an classification recognizes that a wide range of 2. This commercial land u commercial i zed service activities exist and are desired which should be limited location fu.ncti on , mix and quantity. Further, such centers should be as to � planned. and developed under performance standard -techniques which are designed to more cl oselY integrate such commercial activities into the land use pattern in such a manner that -concern is given to the overall environment impact of such activities to surrounding and adjacent land u.se. Within this. limited servece classification falls many diverse activities such as Y g a. Highway interchange commercial location; b. Office and industrialized parts , c. :Commercial al areas adjacent and in. close proxi mi.ty to major commerci al centers. 3. Zoning BC(M Business Commercial (Modified) ) • proposed, are permitted in a BC(M) District. 4. Retail uses, such as the one p p i nesses are only permitted i n thus zoni ng district by a Special Use Permit, 5. Some bus Y p. . and some are rohi bi ted enti rely. The City Planner must be informed, however, P therefore, fore of an incoming tenants to this building to determine whether those uses are ermi tted, prohibited, or require a special use permit. p of the Community Design Review Board Ordinance states that 5 . Section 202.180 to recommend p ommend approval of an application, the Board shall make the following findings: • the or osed development and its relation- ship el ati on - a . That the design gn and location on of p p . • neighboring or existing or proposed developments and traffic s h� p to nei gh . . 9 1S such that i t will not i mpai.r the des i rabi 1 ty of investment or e neighborhood;. that it will not unreasonably i n.terfere occupation � n th g with t n e use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed i will not create traffic hazards or congestion. developments, and that t b. That the design and location of the proposed development Is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental � to the harmonious, orderly, and attracts ve development contemplated t contem p by this ordinance and the village Comprehensive Municipal Plan. •. proposed development c. That the des gn and location on of the p would provide a p P desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aes theti cal ly . of good composition, material s , textures and colors. 'Ion its recommended actions for approval may: The'Board • deems reasonable to its action of -approval. a, Reco��mend any. condi ti ons that i t . •w r e Public Works Considerations 1. Al 1 uti 11 ti es are available from Beam Avenue. 2. At the time Beam. Avenue was to be constructed, it was the Publ i -c 'Works Department's intent to allow only three access points to. -the, properties south of Beam Avenue, between White.Bear Avenue and Southlawn Avenue .Specific locations for the curb cuts were not determined. The majority of the landowners were in agreement with this plan. 3. The. City Council has adopted a policy to limit curb cuts onto the south side of Beam Avenue to a.maximum of three. one temporary curb cut per lot is being allowed. to those -properties not des i g-nated for a permanent driveway. 4. The two recently. approved businesses along the south size of Beam ' Avenue , were required to provide cross easements for access to and from the adjacent properties. These businesses were granted temporary curb cuts to be removed when access becomes available through a neighboring. lot (see enclosed s.chemati c) . S. one of the permanent. driveway openings is on the subject parcel . 6. To align the proposed driveway with the median opening in Beare Avenue, the drive- -way. should be moved 10 feet. to the west. The. displ-aced parking- stall ..should then be added on the east s.i de of the driveway. Analysis The main issue in this case is the cross easements to implement the common _ , driveway plan. City Code requires that Board not approve plans that will create traffic hazards or congestion. The Board must also find that "the design and location of the proposed -development i s in keeping with the character of the .surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly, and attractive. development contemplated by this ordinance and th.e Village Comprehensive Plan. An objective of the plan is that the Village coordinate the design of street and highway facilities with land deve.l opment In the vicinity of intersections and interchanges in order: a. To provide for satisfactory traffic movement; b* To provide access from the major street -and highways systems to major commercial., industrial, employment, and residential areas within the commu-nity. co To. eliminate conf l i.cts with traffic on local streets wi.thi n the Vi l page ; d. To. make the best use of public expenditures on streets and associated improvements In order to faci l tate safer traffi c�-ci rcul ati*on movement within the community greater concern should be . ta.ken by the Village to adopt street access policies and controls. Al 1owi ng 'individual driveways for each parcel on Beam Avenue would create a traffic ..h .zard, parti cul ari ly from the. Sherwin Willi ams site to White . Beare Avenue. Individual driveways fro these lots would cause traffic to* flowinto the ri .ht . g turn lane on Beam Avenue The hazard would be compounded. when these motorists attempt to cross three lanes of traffi c to take: a left onto White Bear Avenue from Beam Avenue. Furthermore, if -each -lot had it's own entrance there would be increased traffic confusion and congestion due to the additional location of turning movement. We nota. have -the opportunity . to avoid the mi -stakes made on White Bear Avenue because of the large number of curb cuts permitted and encourage p-1 anned and orderly development on Beam Avenue, Staff' s . ob jecti ve is the efficient movement of traffic on city streets, The site plan is set up for common ..driveways. Staff can only suggest from relatively minor changes in the plan 1. The site plan. should. be revised. to pick. up a five foot parking. lot setback from the side and rear lot lines,,* This could be easily achi eyed by reduce ng the 30 foot driveway west of the building to 25 feet, the ... southerly dri ve aisle to 30 feet, and by eliminating the two easterly :park.ing spaces- in. pacesin. the rear lot. This is shown on the..enclosed schematic drawin g 2. The driveway should be moved ten feet to the west to be al i ned with the Beam . g Avenue median cut and Maplewood Mall access. 3. The landscaping plan should be resubmitted showing the. revised site design and planting types and sizes 4 . The rear elevation of the building should 'be brick like- the front and side ele- vations. An attractive rear elevation is important because of the -abutting issingle family residential property. An attractive landscape screen also very important along the south lot line., The applicant. feels that having a . main entrance on their property will cause them liability and maintenance problems. Staff does not see. that this access• w111 be such a problem, however. In fact, having this access point on their property p p Y should be an asset. Much of the traffic would enter at their store Ovingthem maximum ex osure over the other stores and p bus? nesses along this sari p If• the Board does not require the cross easements the site plan should be redesigned for a si ngl e business use - the drive should be reduced and moved to the east, to discourage traffic from usi ng the median cut, and internalarki n should be rearranged.. - P g Recommendation Approval of building design and site Tans. for the • p proposed Sherwin W� 17 i ams Store, subject to the following conditions: 1. There shall be a mi nimum of a five foot parking lot setback from side and rear 1 o -t lines; 2. The rear elevation of the building shall also be -brick; 3. A . revi sed .landscaping plan sh.al-1 be submitted for Boar • planking types and. sizes" Board review identifying 4 4. Appl i cant shall provi de reci procal easements,, to be approved ' by the Ci ty Attorney, allowing for ingress and egress from the adjacent properties; 5. All rooftop and exterior building equipment shall be screened in a decorative manner. Screeni na shall. be subject to Staff approval; 6. The driveway shall be moved westerly 10 feet to line up with Beam Avenue median opening. The displ aced parking stall shall be shifted to the east side of the relocated driveway--, 7. Continuous concrete.curbing shat 1. be provided around the entire parking lot except those areas on the "frontage road.. alignment 8. Site -security lighting shat 1 be provided and shall not cause any . undue glare' onto adjacent properties or roadways; - 9. Signage will be reviewed .separately and is not included • i n this approval ; - 10. Approval of building design plans does not constitute approval of a bui 1 di ng permit;-. 11. A trash enclosure shall be provided if outdoor trash storage is to be uti 1 i zed. It shal 1 be of a masonry materi al at 1 east five feet i n height, and shal l be compati bl e wi th the bui 1 di ng. The 1 ocati on woul d be subj ect to Staff approval 12. Two handicap parking. stalls shall be provided. Each shall measure at _ 1 east 12 feet in width,'. If the Board does not require the cross easements, Staff recommends the proposal be tabled for the site to be redesigned Approval is based on the following findings: ° .1. That . the design and.. location of the proposed development and its rel ati ons hi p to neighboring or existing or proposed developments and traffic is such : that i t will not impair the -desirability of investment or occupation i-n the ' neighborhood.; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of :neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. 2. That the design *and location. of the proposed development is in keeping with the character . of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious , orderly, and attractive development. contemplated by this ordinance and the Village Comprehensive Municipal Plan. 3. That the des i n and location of the proposed development would provide a des i r- abl e environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors,, and that it is aesthetically of good composition.. materials, textures and col ors Enclosed: oti on by C ovn V 1. L. cation. Ma - 2. Property Line Map 3. Beam Avenue Development Schematic Diagram . _r��� :Pa. a 40 Plans dated by Staff 12-24-79� • �v1 u �'GHT y. • 6.1S �.. ...1•. i1 � .J uwV . ♦rte. . JL' .. - . .. -.Y. i .... .+.. • u • •..' , •.: `. . ti t . O' •y � � L a4 - ' . • "1 ', .�.,.....-.` D„ COUNTY ROAD r. W T30NR22VY WOODLYNN A o C3) 34 FU.RNESS 1 CT. LYDIA 3A d I T29NRZZW 00 o _ STAND i / U. X Luj LL BEAM 11) AVE �-- a `—' m ,ion _ (1.) M A i� RA AT. _ 68 (2.+CHI N(3.-) CHI NORTH ST. p 4 _ 0 >`.� v o U) a W KO+iLMAN AVE _. KOHLAN AVE. W Z Z ,� ,� < 236 N to Y �' ' f • R-• i ROAD���/// (n W v~) �- v EDCEHIuu RD. W W J_ 65 OC cc N a DEMONT u. AV Eu). �c ROOK AVE • F— ' AV �� 11th AVE. � C W ' CD SEAT Q? i AY 24UON* S AV E. --� � G ANDYIEYP 1 AVE co ..�� �s7 ^ S 36 - VIKiN DR. CcSTLE Avg, r! - Y lrT S N E R R E M EAVE , ,/ R EN AVE. :� S OpE AVE. COPE AVE. uy ~ LARK � AVE. 1 AYE �_ >~ ARK AVE LAURIE RQ. z LAURIE RD Y -9< J O'Q 4 < z p W w IM 25 W 64 J 4 AVE. U � �_ AVE >- � RU KE ` ,,. _ J U RKE t _ 1 [D ELDRipG -1 AVE. �. �MAPtEWOOD R (1) STANICH CT. �T vyc y PUBLIC WORKS_- C, v J SLOG. aN w BELMON IT c� AVE. N 64 a •�6 r � VESKiLLMA N c*� a AVE. MA Ft 115 Soo tol I � 40 ROS 11fOOD avc ti - I _ _Am . . 1. 0 .. 1 - t 1 1 • at :�_ _- ' Ifo• ._ OP4 Lr EIbrGt� •I . .' .. f/,4 ,C Al 375160 r- 3, . P. I 26+- V& 6+ 5�. 11,E t. X30 .� � t- C.T. FILE h9 i6D 8 - 2-'7I i Iao• too' Ito' too Z 164.56• r3 �; - �bs.44 - 4a t.SCo c. t.30 ac 2.30 ac. ac.. 420 1.30a�c. 84 ac� Sp R a r • .... . .4-a ac. sso m �' F, 4sa ° 4)0 + . 50 5o t �, 3v5) , 185• 325 "i o .S9 ac. - .6o ac. .011 ac. . Grl5 at. 1.05 a -c_ �• 0. {.O: ac - 400 3 - ,'s u (-405) l 0 38 ac. - o - ,� �. 4 0. rQ 470 _4 2S. C_ 52.D 4-9 - � -505•} 50 5o So + �(0o 3 �o - . 4 5 ac. 5, 50 5 0 `'d r 4 a� cu too 090 Ola 3p 0 $o 060 too, too• - 120 i0d 85• 100• too' 90 {403• 100 V A T�• AV ( 691.2 75• 150• too' IDD• loo•.. s2o' ioo' zoo • lOt7'� 15- .fv9 ac. .• -46 ac- .46 ac. .6'6&c. V% .4(Oac... .S2aG• .. -�a ac.. b .39 at .j p r' .c..34 t�= • .34 dQ C. ' .± � O -.= ID v �. + a l 6 o NO 4 - It 02(7 010 460 s j90 !8o J.00 09 152 �+6z �S2 05z 5 5! 4oatc. 3'2 52 � o - f G = (+ 36O) .41 ac. - - _ •' - •4•. bU � .ter ��' L;• l "� + co 0 18C).t5' ioo• ioo' .y. Fi✓o.: k r. . • • • A � .i.-, 1. 1 1 ' • • L ' • \Y. r77 • 'TMTTM ,• • • • •• 0 •• i/ ?. r•• .•. .• �• • I•,,i r�:y • t•• •. i•• 1•�•� 1!.•••. .!•..•\••,.i•••.d• �r••••••I•„r•� it :�••r ••��i�• •.'�•• ••�•• 1 �.1• M�'•.t��i��.•w.\..; :I• •�• { • '•••'�•���`��:•••��•••••i'i,••••~••.••••`••j.�••�•i�•••r .ti r; •t••••: l• /. w••',•• \.. ..r •fir �I�t • � • • wr �.....C+ra�C""'�C�J t../ �•C's •�•'�..$I►7 �. 1 � �"r' �1n � .. � L`�r`�I"."'� I "• V� [ U I I i I I 1 1-1 -H I I -1 It 1.1 j1mm1UTMT7,U 1 1 1 1 1 ti:.J ' r I , 1 I � 1 � � I I ,il II I i i I r� III I I + w cn 1 l� � / . � 1 1 1 1 Q i ti: • .r��l :_ �::i�:: Oji« , •� 'S^ ''!rii • { M •� . � I � .,jj : •ter. µ�;�M :U .•i LULI I . .tet ;� 1 r _ �.... P .. _ ':• i . �.._.._ �• 1 • 1 r.r � RI I I I I ILI I y I • (• � � , 1 • 1 , I , ' 1 t , I � • ( I MIA i � I f � • •BURNETHERWI"' WILLIAMS RACQUETBALL CLUB S MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FOM Director of Community. Development SUBJECT: Quad Design Ordinance DATE: February 13, 1980 Council hasrecently been concerned with assuring that there will be some variety in the appearance of quad buildings in large projects. The enclosed ordinance is recommended to accomplish this. by Cor G - _,. P Date ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 202 OF THE MAPLEWOOD CODE Section I.' Section 202.150 of the Maplewood Code is hereby amended to read as follows - 6. The- Community Design Review Board shall make sure -that all buildings having a similar exterior design and appearance shall be located at least 500 feet from each other. Dwellings shall not be considered similar in exterior design and appearance if they have one or more of the follow i ng characteristics a. There is a substantial change in orientation` of the houses on the lots. b. The appearance. and arrangement of the w -i ndows and other. openi ngss -i n the front elevation, including the appearance and arrangement of the porch or garage, are substantially different from. adjoi n.i ng dwellings. c. The type and kind of materials used in the front elevation, is sub- stanti al ly different from the design and appearance of -adjoining dwell - ings. Section 2. This ordinance shat -1 take effect from and after its . passage and publ i cation.... Passed . by the . Ci ty Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota this day of 1980. Mayor - Attest: Ayes Clerk Nays = TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Planning Consultant Contract DATE: February 13, 1980 Enclosed. i s a contract with Northwest Associated Consul tants , Inc. to complete the updating of the City Comprefhensive Plan. The -City previously had a contract with Midwest Planning and Research, Inc. .This'corporation oration 'has recently been dissolved because of legal and financial problems TheLichri ncit and Tim Erkkila. David Licht has now forme p al s of that Corporation that are .working with Mapl e.wood are David p pd a new corporation called Northwest t Associated Consul tants , Inc. Tim Erkki 1 a will sub. contract with Dave Licht. The work program in the enclosed .contract is identical to the contract with Mid- wes t P1 anni ng, I nc. The original contract was for $19,250. The Ci ty has paid Midwest $165225 and we .have an unpaid bill of M.000. This 1 eaves . a balance for the new contract of $23025.. Recommendation Approval of the enclosed contract with Northwest Associated Consul tants , .Inc for $25,025. CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL PLANNING SERVICES This Agreement made this day of 1980, by and, between. the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation:, here -- i nafter referred to as Client, and NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC.. hereinafter referred to as the Consultant, relating to the -employment of Consultant as follows: A. OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES 1. The Client had contracted for services in compliance with Mandatory Land Planning for completion of a comprehensive planning program as described in Exhibit A of this Agreement. Upon determination by the Client, the Agreement for completion of this service with its prior consultant has been official ly terminated . Fol lowi ng due consideration, the CIient has authorized the execution*of this Agreement in order to complete the un- finished portions of its comprehensive planning program based upon work and products completed to date. 2 The proposal, dated 9 November 1978, is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference . For purposes of determi ni ng the scope of services to be performed, the proposal is considered to be an integral part of this Agreement. 3. The Consultar)t shall complete the unfinished. tasks as described in Exhibit A of this Agreement. B. PRODUCTS TO BE. PROVIDED BY CONSULTANT The products provided by the Consultant shall be as described in the proposal which is attached as Exhibit A of this Agreement which were not. completed under prior contractual arrangements. C. PRODUCTS TO BE PROVIDED 'BY CLIENT The following products are to be furnished to the Consultant by the Client: I Available -relevant material pertaining to completion of the project. 4820 Minnetonka Boulevard., Suite 420 � c c, m i n n expo l i s, m i n nesota:. 55416 612-377-6979 ` Maplewood, Minnesota February 7, 1980 10 Page Two 2, Background information and Consultant product review through meetings and interviews..with officials, staff and designated citizens and other interest groups D. PROJECT SCHEDULE The Consultant shall begin work on the project immediately upon dare of Client's appg roval of this Agreement, and be totally completed within eight (8) months of that date, unless delayed' for reasons of unexpected emergencies, forces beyond the control of thep arti es, or by request uest of a party acquiesced in writing by the other party. E. DELAY CAUSED BY CLIENT .In the event Consultant's performance of services hereunder is delayed due to acts of the Client .or at the. request of Client and such delays exceed thirty .(30) days, Consultant shat I have the right to renegotiate the contract to account for rising costs before resuming work and shall not be penalized for any delay- resu I ti ng therefrom Fe COST OF SERVICES 1. The services and work described in this Agreement 'will be completed on a time and -materials basis, as per the attached fee schedule, not to exceed Two Thousand. Twenty -Five Dollars ($2,025 000), 2. All costs incurred will be due and payable to the Consultant upon receipt of an invoice showing the work completed and the cost of said work. For any invoice not paid within thirty (30) days, the Consultant will have the option of interrupting work without termination. of the contract. A service charge .of one (1) percent per month will be added to each invoice not paid within thirty (30) days from the date of invoice. 3. For an work authorized b . the C.l ient, documented in writing, which is Y Y beyond that described in this Agreement, such work shall not be included as part of the maximum dollar I imi.t stated in paragraph F,1 . but shat l be compensated' at establ ished b i I 1 i ng rates as described i n the attached Standard Rate Schedule with materials and expenses .charged at cost plus 15% to defray processing ......... Maplewood, Minnesota February 7, 1980 Page Three G. TERMINATION 1 . This Agreement may be terminated b either part delivering to the other g Y Y Y party written notice of termination in which case this Agreement shall be deemed -terminated as of 9°00 a.m. on the Thirtieth (30th) day fol Iowa n9 receipt of said written notice (termination.date)c, 2 In the event of termination by the Client, the Client shall pa 'the Consultant . Y for `mark completed- after the termination date on a time plus materials basis, suchY pa ment to be made within thirty (30) days after receipt.by Client of a final invoice showing work completed.. All materials shall be retained by the Consultant until allY p a ments due from Client have been received`: by the Consultant 3e In the event of termination by the Consultant, the Consultant shall forward to the Client on or prior to the termination date any unearned fees. or retainers held by the Consultant. All materials held by the Consultant shall be returned to the 'Client within thirty (30) days of termination date. H. RENEGOTIATION In order. for th is document to become a contract between Consul to-nt and Client, Client must sign and return said document to Consultant within forty-five (45) clays of the date appearing at the top of Page One hereof.' Failure of. Client to sign and return this document to .Consultant within said forty-five (45) days shall entitle Consultant at its:option to renegotiate the terms hereof. NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CG NSULT.ANT S, C, David R. Licht, President Date MAPLEWOO D, MINNESOTA Date Date Please Sig:n and Return, Duplicate Copy NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS., INC. RATE SCHEDULE STAFF MEMBER RATE PER HOUR AP $35 00 toPrenc! Is.:(Directors)•O.Oe••eee•••se••e••oOe•••eY••••e•O•�►a • "$ 5.00 Associates Assistant Directors) .•......••.•.•..•.o•.•.••.e•.c$25•00 to $35.00 Senlor.Analyst •••o••••®e••eowe•••e•ee•oe••eieo�••••••esee Senior Landscape Architect .•es•oe••ee••••o•s•••••o••••••s•• Senior Planner t000•oe••s•o•••o•.•oo.o•••••eoe•e.•e•••.••e•$22•50 to $27.50 Senior Urban Designer •.ee. ...•.e•eve•....•••..e•.•.•e Senior Public Administration Specialist s•o•s.•••••ee••••••eee� Analyst o••••s•••o•••�••.•e•eo•••• •••••e•ea••�•••••• Landscape Architect-....*****o•e •e•••e•eee•••oocs•••••e••'• Planner .........$15,00to $20.00 Urban Designer.oe•e•••.•o•oese•••••e•••o•ess•••o'••ee••e•• Public Administration Special ist • •.. •... a •...•.•.••....•..... Aide • e•••s••.••eo••see••••e•eo••oe•e•ee•ee•o•••eo•e•se•• Technician•eoee••••••eeo••••e•.s.o••••s••e•eea•o••o••e•a• 7.50 to $15.00 Secretary • o • 04 o • . • • *goes • • • e • • • s • s • • o e s • • eggs ******a e • o s e Outside Consultantse•.••••••e•••.••e••••e••ea•••••••••••.e.PerJob Basis Supplies ••••••••••e•••so•••••••s••.••e••••••ACtucll Cosi' FF •••••o•osoeoo Mile .Mileage •.................ee..s.e.•..•..•.......•.........25� Per Mile Expert Testimony • e e . • .... • • f • • ei •.• ... . • • O e e • .... . • e • . .. .e 10 Hourly Rate - Minimum Charge $300ow 015 F a a ki U i.� . . . . . '�►a�i Manning •design . market research 11 ly 5• k, ri f 11 �`"� ;per . `."), . 416 eastenrn avenuen*�nefis : l rnhnesota 65414 (612)379-4600 EXHIBIT A PROPOSAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE (MANDATORY. -LAND PLANNING ACT) MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 9 November 1978 BACKGROUND The Minnesota State Legislature during their 1.976 session enacted the Mandatory Land Planning Act. This directive, as administered by the Twin Cities Metropoli- tan Council requires that all local units of government within the region must • either formulate or update their comprehensive plans and rela{ed development guides and controls to 'conform ,to the stipulations of the law. As d consequence of this situation, the City of Maplewood mint relook and update its planning .and implementation tools, As an initial Means for determining the City's needs in bringing itself into conformity with State Low, an analysis was conducted of: {1) The Mandatory Land Planning Act; 2) Metropolitan Council Mandatory Planning Guidelines; 3) Maplewood;s Metropolitan System Statement; 4) the information and emphasis dernands as now required by the Metropolitan Council as demonstrated in our work with other area communities; and 5) problems as identified through discussions with City staff Based upon these needs, requirements and directives, Midwest Planning has assembled a propos.al to assist the City of Maplewood in the update of. its 1972 Comprehensive Plar.. An underlying. theme of the anticipated work is that the existing Comprehensive Plan is reflective of the communityis policies and wants in terra of development and improvement.. The existing plan, therefore establishes the basic directives which should be expanded upon only as hec:essary to met state legislature requirements, ,Additionally, at this time ordinances are not to be included in the scope•of work. It is understood that this element of the program will possibly be addressed at sora later date. The approach and procedures which Midwest Planning would utilize in working with the City staff, Planning Commission, and City Council in assisting the City in completing its Mandatory Planning requirements and addressing community concerns are outlined in the following section of this .proposal. 2 GE NERAL APPROACH In undertaking comprehensive pian and ordinance revision assi.gnrnen.ft,. Midwest Planning follows a fundamental proven approach and. process, This. process which is depicted ' graphical ly on the follow"ing page, is however, modified and tailored in each instance to accommodate precise needs of, and legal planning requirements unposed upon. the client being served. Wi thi n' th is context, there are l however, basic concepts and approaches which should be highlighted and understood, An approach which is followed and an initial work task undertaken by hAidwest Planning is what we term "planning tactics". midwest Planning, where permitted, prefaces all comprehensive planning projects with such d study. As a firm, we feel this to be one of the paramount needs of any planning ef=fort.. Joo.oftent planning and development projects and progra m, are undertaken without a --clear definition of what is to be accomplished within the parameters of the structure, time and resources* ava i fable . As a consequence of this lack of management, education and communication, a waste of time, money and effort is'a likely result. '=Planning Tactics" halm to eliminate such a situation. The tactics process involves issue or problem i.dentificaton, work priority assignment, precise definition of work tasks and budgets, and selection of detailed problem solving approaches. By prefacing an overall planning program in this fashion, the probability of producing an acceptable and effective end result is greatly, increased . A parallel product of the tactical stage of work is the education of the program parti- cipants. The intent .of the tactics effort is also to acquaint both th.e consultant and the .client with onn another. Attention is also directed toward informing all involved. to the fact that the study and planning is being conducted and -the fashion in which it will- be completed. This objective is accomplished. through intervievn and discussions with. the City Council, Planning Commission, Park Commission, etc. The critical resc.l t -of this. process is that all participants become involved and gain an understanding .of what will be none, what is expected of them, and the time framework and products to be provided. Through such an effort a structure and organization. is also typically formulated for citizen participation and information dissemination. Within a general operations context, another nnajor emphasis which Midwest Planning strongly promotes in the formulation of comprehensive plans ispolicy planning. The formulation, review and eventual adoption -of comprehensive, specific and detailed development policies is seen as essential from. severalers ect ives . As an initial con - P P sideration, policies should serve as the basic, fundamental plan of a jurisdiction. The policies establish the direction to be taken and accomplishments which are to be achieved. In addition, guidance is provided for how achievements are to be reached. Hav ,.ng established such a framework, the physical design of the City can be pursued with a strong degree of assurance that proposed development plans wil l be within a context which is acceptable to the decision -makers and general citizenWhile the ry policy approach cies. add some initial extra time to the completion of a comprehensive .Plan, a time savings is typically 1 realized in the long run through acceptance of tan. tTP Y � g p p p= Is . 3' FIGURE 11 ComprehL*-%nsive. planning process: -P at nin ta ICS ........................................ ............................ ............................. ..... .... .............. ........ r - m....Lo... . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77N .•. '• . . :f+. . .-=-tom � w plannina.,, inventory•. sisal economic. socialIX: .. land tram -� r� s�t �t • r-� �� unity y ko . . use tation facilities lation ValuesPotentiais ....... .......... ... .. '. •••.. ••' .. '.• r.. . . • 1•••.•. •. . ... • • g • lift P? P4C plan r•J �. plannin' and .tk sneao#)JctIV� development k !, popsies plan. X Xl 5 .0 'l. i1. • 1yY{5r�.I \ } t 0 x L" Y./ I • r t 1 Y. [ Y t R 1( 1 X► I> C�`rt'•7��[Y�(r i X i• ••i C �• Y �L • ! [ �t i Y•• . ..L, S„i 7 T •� S L 2� � XLvA,_� `>�¢' .•r • i T.c� 'LC"' _ " 1C, r �� , :�`+��x_`:. tii. a c�' 'Y'�._ r'' �• A ..� .�•� Pl aniro,��� mA } [ Y f .e.'I �!•i tl Y. Xx 00 .KI 1• A T..��:t .."� i�:w .•. II.. 1 r Y r r� : x .d..,u::�r�i�w •s X••s V-A entatt'o- . 't . �; � . .3t .'[' .+C : i. T � �+, ,f � . Y JC .. +.r • '.�.�.�•'T � a. S .• � f �. _ ., R: .1�r Y��gk�iy!'^O�...�"'fix•`}.cl••i���"f� �� �. • ✓ � R, ;: r • lYLrt• fC.. .t �T r/..� >tir•'.y• + :b��; ._N ir�• R• , j i' r r•�.G,,�"�'I' • ti `..^ .. r i VI �. •r•�. f ,�"'�•!'r{ ¢�.{ �S..r }^�v 4���.�A¢�_ '�= � tin ..�. �' f s.�k'" to i 4 • E The policy approach, however, also facilitates citizen and decision-rnaker partici- pation. Demanded as part of this effort is the review and involvement of the Client., The resul ng by --product is education and clarification to all concerned as to what is 'to be'achieved and. how it wi l 1 be ac * pl ished . Another important aspect -of pol icy planning is that it assists Client, notedly the decision -maker as wel I as the general citizenry, in clarifying the steps and procedures which will be followed in accomplishing the realization of .the comprehensive plan. Too often in the past, plans stressed only an end Product The Policy Plan Pro erlY executed. provides, the means for end product achievement by detailing how the plan is to be accomplished . In all recent comprehensive planning projects, Midwest Planning hos utilized a strong policy planning approach. The high level of Client part icipation'and involve- ment and resulting plan acceptance attest to the validity and success of the Tannin � P g approach . In those instances where a large enough stud is involved or where an a ilicable Y PP situation exists, Midwest Planning has utilized a neighborhood or "area" planning approach Following this approach, once the Policy Plan has been established. a PP Y , study area is divided into planning districts as party of a concept plan. The basis of .division is typically the existence of natural or man-made barriers, which serve to differentiate portions of a study area. A basic, individual plan covering land use, transportation and public facilities and service is then formulated for each planning district. This facilitates addressing specific problems as well as opportunities which may be unique to a giv* en area. As such, a stronger degree .of direction is provided than has been the ease with past traditional planning efforts . The degree. and extent of citizen participation and interest in the planning program is also increased. This approach has already been established as part of the current Nlva'plewood Comprehensive Plan and would be again utilized as part of the updateP gro ram Another concept which is unique to Midwest Planning's approach to comprehensive pians is the emphasis placed upon economics and resultant demand or rnarketabil it Y• both public and private.,.Midwest Planning is the only professional planning firm in this region which has land use planning, real estate research and economic capabilities "in-house". 1n offering and applying- this expertise, it should be realized that for planning policies and objectives to be meaningful to Maplewood, such decision must be made in light of.the economic and financial realities affectingthe City, Former tannin Y planning studies performed for communities, counties, and regional governments without a.n accompanying economic overview of the area have run the danger of becoming text -- book planning examples, with little or no chance of the policies andobj(ectives being implemented due to economic constraints'. - In keeping with. the company's pot icy of stressing planning implementation, the background provided by.the economic research. component fixes the parameters of possible action, and tends to focus. the planning process toward -implementable policies and practical levels of achievement k Ions and imp-lementation, A'final general concept, oriented towards action -responsive p is Midw . e'st Planning's • emphasis on providing continued technical assistance to public 0 plans and ordinance revisions. . A m,ajor T" following completion of pI clients, 60th do, ing and overnments have failure in the.past has been this critical follow..through. Local 9 d for profeion ssional assistance during plan formulat.:and generally accepted the ne.e ordinance updates. They, as well as the consulting prattice itself, have, however, rofessional gui-dance in the plan - -implementation failed to acknowledge the need for p .0 . - f plans area. The result of this si tuation has .been the wide spread .lack of use or mis-use- 0 ly encourages a commitment and regulations 0 As a consequence, Midwest Planning. strong to contin lued and on-going profeSssional advice and assistance . In view, of the * staff within the City Administration, this conseration may not be a capabilities existiid ng strong concerti in the plewood situation With theutilization. of the planning approaches described above, in addition to and I ' combined ed with the operating philosoPhies noted in the following sections, it *is felt orn i n which would not that Midwest Planning can deliver an u dated Comprehensive Plan p and used . as a constant dec"Ision-making base %.e• onl� be accepted, but also highly regarded the by the C i ty,41 The fashion proposed for the delivery of this product i . s detailed in .following subsection on the pro . posed approach. and work program* WORK PROGRAM . -work tasks, This subsection of the proposal organizes and outlines the specific program, Products and schedule which would be fol lowed or Produced in formulating. compre- r�i`iaplewood.is program hensive plans and ordinances tor the City of .The general basis of.th* is the.planning process as depicted in Figure I and rhe related concerns and approaches 6 CH. -program considerations previously described. with these basic approaches and Duero[ in mind the following paragraphs detail the individual work tasks. The structuring ed and depicted in Figures I I and I I I The f i are summarized and ordering of these'tasks -k tasks: and elements* ship of the work diagram.indi-cates the progression and inter -relation Figure I I . I relates the.. ordering of how the various tasks would. in fact be accomplished and the time devoted to each ele-me-nt* TASK I - PLANMNG TACTICS The general objectives and purpose of a Planning Tactics Study were outlined in the Of concern at this preced•ing section and consequently will not be. reiterated. here point is the Tactics Stud as it. would be applTed to . the City cif Maplewood The - Y *d T _- ti [-- Study phase ..of work would specific products to be produced in the Ma'plewo*o PC co Spec m O'k . er'objecti'ves and concerns. In be two*. The first -is definition of local decision-' essence this Work provides a local focus of matters which need to be addressed*- when combined with. State Legislative and Metro' oli-tan Council directives, this'should- serve. p . - 0 fo focus planninq work more -sharply. This product. would result from interviews and discussed 'being conducted with the City Council., Planning Commission, other designated staff, and other individuals or. m concerned comunityadvisory groups, groups the Client may feel. have valid contributions and i nputs M TASK V I TASK V11' IP�I`�PLEt Ef�TATLONIMPLEMENTAT ION Ordinances and kegulations TASK VIII ON GOING ASSISTANCE 1 Technical Assistance 2. Irnplement-q,tion . . FIGURE ! MAPLEWOODr MINNESOTA � .. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE GENERAL PROCESS STRUCTURE AND CONCEPT TASK i f ' TACTICS I . Finalization 2. Offi c ial In.f ery iews 3, Guideline Summary TASK If INVENTORY l.' Social 3. Phys+cal 2 . E ccnomi c 4. Fi rio nc is l TASK- III - DEME LOPME NT FRAMEWORK . PO icy Plan 2. Concept Plan 3. Lang Lke and Gin. Facilities TASK V TASK 1V HOUSING PLAN D�T/�lLED 1rACILITlES PLAN •l. Profile I. Transportation 2. Policies 2. Seurat 3. Action Plan 3. Wate r 4. Storm Draimge a. Parrs/Open Space TASK V I TASK V11' IP�I`�PLEt Ef�TATLONIMPLEMENTAT ION Ordinances and kegulations TASK VIII ON GOING ASSISTANCE 1 Technical Assistance 2. Irnplement-q,tion . jk.er second product of the tactical stage would be a structure and organization for citizen and.public official participation and information. dissemination. If these elements are addressed at this beginning stage of the process, work on the Compre-- hensive -p.lan can proceed. in an organized and concentrated fashion without later interruption or delay, As a result of .the active involvement by City staff, ..lt is suggested that the Community Development Director, participate with Midwest Planning personnel in the interviews and discussions to be conducted with the community leadership.. It is expected than time requi red for these meetings would not exceed two to three sessions and would be conducted at the Ci,ty's offices. The balance of the Planning Tactics work which includes an outline of planning directives as established by the Metropolitan Council plus a draft of the organization and structure of the planning program and public and official par--icipation effort would be prepared by Midwest Planning This would be first submitted to City staff for review and recommendation. and then finalized for presentation and distribution. It is expected that thirty to forty copies of. the final report document would Abe supplied and that presentations would be made to the City's advisory and decision -raking- bodies. It is envisioned that the entire flask can be completed within a maximum of fifteen 4-o thirty drys. TASK II a INVENTORY AND INFORMATIONAL BASE Essential to the formulation of a viable and effective updated comprehensive develop- ment plant is the est'abl ishnient of a sound informational and statistical base. which details' the City's current characteristics, status, trends and projected future needs . This is also essential as a mans whereby the City can respond fo rnetropol icon issues and defend positions which it may take differing with regional policies. From a comprehensive perspective, this information, base must cover social, economic and physical concerns Additionally, public fiscal and tax base concerns also need to. be addressed It is understood that certain elements of background -information cre currently being assembled or exist in one. fashion or another. In recognition of this fact and in order to minimize costs and avoid duplication, it is proposed that the inventory be approached as a technical background document which coordinates and summarizes sources of information in "rough" format Additionally, due to the factual and statistical nature of the material, a limited number of notebook copies would be prepared, These would primarily be utilized by City staff and the consultant, plus forwarded to the Metro- politan Council as plan support material . The .primary focus of the Planning inventory would be as follows: A* Social Profile Update: Little additional information on social characteristics can be added to this section of the Planning Inventory, lacking a new federal census. A topic which, however, must be addressed is population/households/ employment- projections and the identification of employees which work and reside in /V�aplewood. Additionally, tie general projections roust b�e i�nade on the basis of Metropolitan Council designated traffic assignment zones. Finally, the update,- genera! .population and household `.forecasts (.1977) of the Metropolitan Council for the City of Miaplewood must be Valuated. A � f t O - - ♦ .i FIGURE III MAPLEWOO►D.. MINNESOTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE WORK SCHEDULE WORK TASKS j F M A M j A 1.0 Tactics h !i 11. Inventory f7 ��� • III . � Comprehensive Plan ��-��: �.�� : �� • « Mme- ♦� �� ��. _ ...Update Iva Detailed Plans,• Parks Other V. ng Plan Housing ��V �.�h���l-• �1 .• � �'f ,�'1'r .V+�'�r-y.,��n SS y�•/pp �r`q�(L Oi� i 70 VI . Ordinances fI{ C s(j V111• Technical AsslSance ' 'y,i;¢Yw} i�s+ty�f�r� .7�.. b~.y� ��j� .}}} t. f yu �y(y�.••' .'1 �) yy1 dila i{aI�1R�ii �'�A(/ •'� :V�...ssi- . Consultant Work O,o Community/Consultant Review Sessions. ® Preliminary Report Public Hearing Final Report B. E.c.Qnomic Base: Critical to the areas growth management and financial tax base concern is a determination of uses, activities, and revenues which can reasonably be expected to compete and maintain economic viability within and for the area In this, regard, urban. economics. -..need to be evaluated and tested. The community must basically define and be aware of its role in relatibriship. to the region, as well as its own ability to sustain levels and ranges of oc itivi't ies.. Also an economic market evaluation will provide the'. v Client a "timing or staging -function" for expected development in order to facilitate appropriate ..order I y responses and services to the private development sector. An economic overview study must be under'taken'. encompassing all types of housing, commercial and. service activities, and industrial d'.evelopment. The scope of t . he study would by necessity have to include a- general analysis of the entire regi -on, but would concentrate on Mapl-ewood and the immediately surrounding subreglona l area, C. Physical Planning Inventory: An update of the physical characteristics and elements of the City must be.gained. . Information would be assembled on land use, with emphasis on housing, including bufldinq condition and value existing. space and activity zot' util"I ton; and environmental factors such as soils, drainage., wetlands., lakes, topography, etc.. Transportation concerns such as existing and proposed street and. road circulation systems, traffic volumes (existing and pro- jected), and accident reports would be determined. Finally, puiblic services and facilities such as util.itios, police and fire, public buildings, and park and open space would-be inventoried D. Financial Profile: It is proposed that special attention and a separate chapter of the inventory be devoted to an analysis of governments 1. finance as a conse*quence of most local units being hard-pressed to meet all their financial obligations. A financial profile would additionally be made, plus an analysis of property tax base would be .provided.. This information would lay the foundation for future capital and other improvement programming, It is our understandingi that a portion of the 'Inventory data is n the process of being .collected and assembled. Additionally, it is anticipated that City planning staff will possibly assist with additional needed -information gathering. Midwest Planning will ' assume primry responsibility for information organization, data analysis and presentation report asse mb I y As a result of the foundation laid by the community profile/inventory report .and the need. to provide this documentation to related units of government and referral to the Metro- pol *1 tan 'Council (minimum of seven copies. required),, twenty-five copies of the inventory report would be provided to the community. Due to.t'he factual and 'statistical nature of the rnaterial.to be assembled, no separate presentations of the reort. envisioned ,,. Review of the *1'nventory. wi I I occur as par't of the review of policies, conce pt plans and.: detailedplansoccurring during the next phases of work. In total, it is est-i.mated that C: maximum of ninety days will be required to complete the inventClr'y effort. Work on thiss task would be initiated at the beginning of the work program and be conducted simul.- with toneously wtthe tactics study, It 10 r •t • • -TAS KC 111' COMPREHENSIVE PLAN! Under. the Mandatory Planning .Process, the comprehensive plan is now referred to as the Land use and general facilities plan The approach established by the current p ens re comPhive Ian would however, be utilized and followed in the update process. In essence, the existing plan would first, be professionally reviewed by Midwest personnel and the City Staff to determine areas which require attention based upon new legal requirements. Additions to.the plan would subsequently be drafted and the existing plan as well as the new areas of concern would be, reviewed with the Planning Commission and City Council. In view of the understood acceptability of the existing plan plus its relatively recent origin, mayor modifications and additions are not anticipated. As a result, .it. is expected that the update of the comprehensive plan document could be completed in as little as sixty (60) days. In view of the required referrals to other local units of government plus the metropolitan council and to insure availability.. of "current" documents, it is proposed that the plan would be reprinted in its update form.. In this regard, up to fifty '(50) copies of 'the docuiment would be provided by Midwest Planning, TASK IV - DETAILED FACILITIES PLAN Although typically cpproached to some degree in past comprehensive development programs, new legislation now requires ires detailed attention to public facilities and g � service plans. This i.s in essence a new .sand added step. to the propess. The plans or background information which are now required in one form or another are water distribution, sewer, storm drainage, parks and transportation. Based upon indications by City staff, it is Midwest Planning's understanding that much of this work is currently inP rocess . Midwest Planning would, however, expect to provide sorne general consultation to the community as part of coordinating the. various planning elements. The one exception in the detailed facilities planning area in which Midwest 'Planning would assume a relatively 'major level of participation is in the park/trai is/open space system planning task.'Since the 1974 "Maplewood Park and Open Space Study" was an extensive study and is still largely being followed , we. propose to provide a park system update which references and supplements the existing document. The end products of our efforts for parks and open space will be to develop a parks and open s ace component for the comprehensive plan wb ich h i gn lights all neve parka deve lopments and Metropolitan Council requirements. No' significant analysis, public participation, or comprehensive ark planning will be anticipated, Midwest Planning and Research, p p p, r.. Inc. will largelywork with the Office of Community Services Staff (Parks -and Planning), plus the Parks Commission and Council to identify and accurately restate Maplewood s Park System Plan to the existing standards. (An evaluation of the existing park and open spa :e study based upon Netropol itCan Council criteria is provided in the appendix to thisprc>posal). m 1I The physical products of this process would-be a textual section of the comprehensive n- Further, full size illustration boards of the plan which addresses parks al"'iId recreati o update Park System Plan will be provided for the City's use; in presentations or public meetings, W.is assumed that this .work would, as a consequence, be conduct.ed simultaniously with the efforts associated with Task 1110 TASK V - HOUSING'.PLAN .. As- noted in Map'lewood's-metropolitan system statement and plan content guidelines, .housing is a specific topic to be addre'sevd. This i.s.also an element 'Which was address'.ed as part or'. the 1972 Comprehensive Plan-. The scope of coverage, however, requires expansion- and also updating. As a consequence, the housing element of the overall work program is seen as a highly. detailed specific and indivi-dual, although coordinated, undertaking As. in the case of the genera[ comprehensive plan, the housing plan must be approached in a staged, increrne.ni-al fashion to facilitate an orderly and -logical plan formulation and decision-making process. The housing plan is seen-as-encornpassln',3 three elements A houssing profile, sumi-nar'izing the existing social, economic and physical hous"ing,conditions as well as projected housing needs and consid6rations would be the first effort undertaken. The policy -plan would be the second element. A detail -ed assessment and action plan for general areas-,. specific ,sites and, individual units and -administration of pmg_ ram would be the third aspect of the plan. As &cormelquence of the detail and pro ramming envisioned', the housing -plan is a separates but coordinated element of the comprehensive plan process. By. necessity, the housing sive pIion. Howe'ver, plan will build upon and\ be related to the cornprehen it will go into creta it on program, organization and implementation o A. Housing Profile: The inventory assembled during Task 1.1 of the work program will provide a fou ' ndation from which to undertake a specific and detailed evaluation of housing within Maplewood The housing problems and needs which are identified through the inventory process will be analyzed and studied in . detail . As necessary, further inforrnation including structural surveys will be a-sliserrbled and analysis conducted to ensure a thorough knowledge of the housing problen-6 and opportunities B. Policy Plan: Based upon the housing profile and the directions establish6*d through the comprehensive plan policy plan, the formulation of a- housiI ic ng po y plan outlining specific goals,.. objectiVesr actions and directions will be formulated by Midwest -Planning and City staff. The policies will respond to both needs as well as opportunities which the communicy can pursue. This policy aspect n a is seeas a highly critical aspect iprovide spect of the -program as t will provide theparameters of approach which the area - will accept in undertaking housing 'improvements and providirig housing opportunities to various ibnco'me levels, 12 , re- R.,..... C • AcNon Pian: From the directions identified from preceding sfiages, Mi�lwes� Planning with the assistance ®f City staff, would pursue the development of a housing action. plan which will constitute the City's implementation program hi's plan would deal with options and alternatives which the area could uti.l ize in deal i ng With its housing problems and opportunities. On an area, site and individual Unit basis, courses of action would be recommended to the City. In addition, .Odmini— strative organization and procedures would be suggested which will facilitate actions to be token by the community As in the case of detailedgP p lans involvin arks, and ln compliance with the existing Comprehensive Plan format, the Housing Plan would be presented as a chapter of the overal 1 plan document, `'fork would be done simultaneously with the main text update of the c�veral l ' len 1ve s however., to the special ize-d, nature and requirements related p to housing, the preparation and processing of the plan would be anticipated to require up to ninety days TASK VI I/ViPLEMENTATION ORDINANCES. The current Comprehensive Plan !Update Project is understood not to include a revision of existing ordinances or the possible addition of neer regulations. The Wndatory Land Planning Act, however, requires that the local units of government provide the &Aetrop olitan Council with a summary statement of the status and scope of existing ordinances and any intention of revisions or additions As such this task is seen as a minor effort which would be comp"l eted by Midwest Planning in conIunction with the City staff, For the benefit of the community,. however, an evaluation would also be prepared of existing regulations, identifying areas of possible need or modification. Additionally, new passible regulations would also be proposed and -general l described . The City could uti l ize sUch information in the eventual y programming of an ordinance revision effort. The summaryreport for the Metropol itan Council and'the ordinance evaluation would be submitted in two separate memorandum t YP. e reports. The task would take no more than fifteen .days from time of initiation. TASK V11 -- IMPLEMENTATION -- PROGRAMMiNG A formal requirement now being imposed by the Metropolitan Council is that communities undertaking a comprehensive plan must expand their scope of efforts to encompass an i mplementat ion programa As applied to the City of Maplewood, this effort . must include capital/community improvements.. This is a logical extension of work and helps ensure realization of the planning recommendations and directions. It is proposed that Midwest Planning with general assistance from City 'staff would initiate a preliminary draft of a ca ital/communi.t improvement program. rp y 13 As part of the planning effort, it would not be expected that the report would. be formally processed, although it should be referred as general support information to the etropol.itan Council . The City, would, however, vti l ize the report as a working docu nt in later budgeting and work programming efforts. In view of this situation, twenty-five copies of the report would be supplied Approximately. y twenty to thirty days would be required for report preparation. TASK vlil .,,. TE-CHNICAL ASSISTANCE Although not included as part of the Cry's request for proposal, it is suggested that as needs r~riay arise and coordination of developmeni requests and planning may be necessary, that Midwest P larin.ing will be available for general consul tation . It is anticipated that this situation will riot be a common occurrence in view of the: in-house professional capabilities which exist in the City. The point to be mode, however, is that the service is available and arrangements for such involvement if considered necessary can be organized during the planning tactics (Stange I) of work. PROGRAM BUD ET Based upon the scope of work and products outl i i -ed in the preceding sections of this proposal, Midwest Planning has formulated a program budget reflective of the tasks to be completed. To be emphasized is that the budget total is a maximum liability on the .part of the City. Work on the part. of Midwest Planning would be completed on a time and materials basis up to the =ximum budget amount stated. Should actual work be completed for a lesser amount due. to staff:.cantribui inns, unanticipated availability of dc.1 etc ., Y the Cit would be charged only for the aunt of work actually performed A factor also to be noted is that the City may hire a student intern who wou{d poss-ibly assist on the project: Midwest .Planning would welcome such local participation and util iAze such assistance wherever possible . Moreover, staff contributions would result in a reduction of time required by Midwest Planning and. modifications reducing budgets. would be negotiated with the City. A determination of this matter is anticipated prior to contract final ization 14 A N FIGURE IV PLEWOOD, MINN-ESOTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE PRELIMINARY PROGRAM BUDGET TAS KI Planning Tactics•• goo e••••oe••••.•00•.goo o••••oeo••$1r000 TAS0e0e000e090000000$41000 KII Inventory Update .o•o.o••s•••e•o•.. T p p AS i III I �,ro+ i � reh`tj,•si v e Plan a l i U dato 6 0•• 0 0• 0 0 0 0• o e o O O• e .• o O• t o$51000 TASK IV Detailed Facility Plans Update e T ranspori,a t i on/Se wa r/S for mMate r (Gene ral Consultation only)xx .oe .....•.ea. 250 Parks/Trails/Open Space � Plan Elernts • e ... • o O . • • $310.00 AS K V Housing Plan e o s ••• o e • 0 0 0 • a•• •• e• e• 0 0 o a• e •• •• o e o o $41000 T g TASK .VI Im lementdtion Ordinances {Evaluation p - and Summary) s • e • • • • • o • • • • • . • • o o • e • • o 0000000 o • o • e • $ 500 `ASK VII Implementation Programming 0••.•1.eo.ae•.s••ei•••*o$1,500 TASK VIII Technical Assistance-•eO`NA- • TOTALxxx (BUDGET" MAXIMUMS)O.•••o•••••••••••••••••••••o $19x250 Cost i ncl udes only Midwest Pl ann i work and product responsibi l ities. xx Need or extent of service to be determined as part of program setup -- prior to or during Task I . xxx Work to be done on a time and materials basis with maximum City cost Iiabilit Y 15 urban punning - design market r sea 416 east hennepin avenue rrunneapolis minnesolk'a 55414 (612)37.9* 4-600 APPENDIX A MAPLEWOOD DETAILED FACILITIES PLANS PARKS AND. OPEN SPACE COMPONENT' REVIEW OF CURRENT PLAN (January 1974) 9 November 1978 As a part of Detailed Facilities Planning for Comprehensive Community Plan Updates, Parks and Open Space P lans w I I be required by the Metropol itan Counci I Parks and Open Sp"ace Plans are nothing new, and Maplewood has already made a substantial investment in such a pian, which was completed in January of 1974,* In April of 1978 .. the Wtropol*tan Council issued the draft copy of the Comprehensive Plan and School District Capital Improvement Program REVIEW MANUAL, "Pages tai -23 thriough. M-27 identify the criteria by which the MUnoicipal parks plans will be reviewed and evaluated. The following is a review of the City parks plan b6.sed on a paraphrasing of W,=,tropolitan Council cr'iteria. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL C.R!TERIA: DOES THE PARK PLAN RECOGNIZE PROPOSED REGIONAL PARK FACILITIES (AS OUTLINED IN THE MiETROPOLITAN SYSTEMS PLAN)? Phalen -Kellen -Gervais and Battle Creek Parks are designated regional facilities, in Mapiewood. The existing park plan recognizes therm .as.county Parks Two regional frail corridors,, plus a state bike trail are also designated regional facellities in Maplewood, which are not shown in the 1974 Parks Plan Report. These need to be added to the Park System Plan. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL CRITERIA: DOES THE LOCAL PLAN INTERRELATE TO THE PROPOSED REGIONAL FACILITIES AND ARE THE LOCAL PLANS COMPATIBLE -WITH THE REGIONAL FACILITY? The specific interrelationships are not discussed in the plan After the Park System Plan is updated and now that regional park plans are being developed, it would ba easier to describe and discuss the interrelationships. It is possible that additional trails may be desired to. link up local parks to regional facilities, METROPOLITAN COUNCIL -CRITERIA: WHAT LAND USES, ZONING OR UTILITIES ARE LOCALLY PLANNED WHICH AFFECT REGIONAL FAC-ILITIES? At this time, it is.difficult to determine if any conflicts or significant impacts are involved. It is likely that on a detailed scale some 'issues may exist.. HoweverU I it is our belief that only major cPn*f1icts or. concerns need to be clarified or resolved, and we are. not aware of any problems on the Ma'plewood-- Park Plan. 17 b .o Y METROPOLITAN COUNCIL CRITERIA: ARE ALL EXISTING LOCAL PARK LOCATIONS DAPPED AND FACILITIES DESCRIBED? 1 The 1974 Plan covers this very well . There is, however, a concern -that parks acquired and/or. developed since. 1974 'be shown on a comprehensive plan update . METROPOLITAN COUNCIL CRITERIA: WHAT ARE THE IDENTIFIED RECREATIONAL NEEDS FOR 1990 AND HOW ARE THEY JUSTIFIED? The existing Plan justifies ark sites can the basis of both l ocat ions (the 13 neighborhoods) and related to Population projections, and recreational de.rnand, These needs should be restated to. identify a 1.99.0 goal and the interim development phasing . METROPOLITAN COUNCIL CRITERIA: HOW WILL THE PLAN .BE FUNDED? - The existing Park Plan does -not adequately deal with funding. The compre- hensive plan update will need to identify how grants, mill rate funds and park dedication moneys will be dispersed on an annual basis for park acquisition and development. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL CRITERIA: WHAT COOPERATIVE RELATIONSHIPS (WITH SCHOOL DISTRICTS THE COUNTY OTHER CITIES) ARE INVOLVED I N THE LOCAL PLAN? Coo erative relationshi s with the School District and at Afton He`sghts Park Q P do exist. These relationships need to be expressed in the plan update. s i N Draft Resol uti o- Declaring Intent To Become an Entitlement Area Y °wH REAs;"the Justice System Improvement Act (JSIA) reauthorizes and restructures the Federal assistance program to -State and 1 ocal governments for crimina-1 justice improvements; and WHEREAS, Under the JSIA formula grants are authorized to State and' local governments to carry out programs of proven or likely effectiveness in improving criminal and juvenile justice; and WHEREAS, Lagger units of local general government., including comb,i nati ons , are eligible to receive a specific portion of Part D. monies and to set priorities for the use of those funds. based on their. analysis of their crime and criminal justice probl ems; and WHEREAS, Jurisdictions eligible .and el.ecti ng to apply for such grants are termed "entitlements" areas; and WHEREAS, Status as an "entitlement" area under the JSIA means (a) certainty of receiving; a specified portion of the states` total allocation of Part D. funds contingent of submission of an approved application; (b) significant antonomy over the use of those funds, and (c) responsibility to meet require- ments, of Federal and State law and regulations; and WHEREAS, ' A combination of local governments qual-i fy as an entitlement area if i t has a total popul ati on of 100, 000 persons and woul d recei ve - at a minimum, $50,000'in Part D funds; and WHEREAS, The City of St. Paul, Ramsey County and any or all of the suburban muni ci pal i ti es of Ramsey County in combination qualify as an entitlement area; and WHEREAS, The City/County of is committed to coordinated criminal 'justice _planning efforts to identify. problems, to set pri ori ti es , and to develop -criminal justice system improvement programs. Action. by Counc l Rojectoci.�.�.., ... . _ -'2 � . ~ ~ �THEREFORE be it, Resolved the City/County of herebyd.eclar8s i tS` int8nti on to Condbinew-i th the Cftv�Of St. Paul.RamSey County and any or all ' ` . ` suburban municipalities Of Ramsey ey COUnty pursuant �o the �pr�Y � S � �n s � 0f the ' i '' ' '! J3IA to become 8 combination "entitlement" area~ ' '! � ' . proper .. letter o ' to Robert Gr1 ' berector of the Crime Control P ' ' ' It has been past practice to permit the carry over of unspent monies for specific purposes from one year to the next. This involves reductions in.the .1979 Budget and corresponding increases in the 1980 Budget . The proposed carry overs involve six different funds and have the following effect on the 1979 Budget: LESS BUDGETED PROPOSED REVISED ACTUAL AMOUNT OVER FUND EXPENDITURES CARRY OVERS BUDGET EXPENDITURES (UNDER) BUDGE General $3,92153.20 .$14,980 $359065340 $35712,147. $(.1945193) Revenue Sharing 5185895 .45500 .5145395 4221,911 ( 91,484) Planning 42,090 155500 26$90 24,021 ( 25569) Water Surcharge- 34,990 95680 255310 185350 ( 61960) Sewer 983,500 485900 9345600. 906,775 ('275825) V..E. M. 2585405, 613045 252,360. 2151,993 ( 36,367) TOTALS $53,7595200 $99,605 $5,6593,595 $5,300,197 $(359,398). It should be noted the total of actual expenditures above is less -than the revised. budget amounts. Budgeted and actual revenues for the above funds were as follows: BUDGETED ACTUAL AMOUNT OVER FUND REVENUES REVENUES (UNDER) BUDGET. General $355785905 $3,5879'43'6 $ 85531 Revenue Sharing 3325650 3195667 (125983) Planning 305850 28,280 ( 25570) Water Surcharge 1325470 145 705 13,2.35 Sewer 9393860 9715917 321P057 V.E.M. 329'3,880 2935514 (36 , 366) TOTALS $55344,615 $5,346.5519 $ .15904 A -comparison of revenues and expenditures for each of the above funds indicates that there are sufficient monies available for all of the proposed carry overs. The following is a detailed listing of the proposed carry overs: Amount Fund Functions Purpose 1)",$ 2050 350 General Elections Supplemental financing for the purchase of two additional voting machines. 2) 220 General Emer . Preparedness Office equipment. 3) 11,410 General Emer. Prepa •edness Warning sirens. 4) 1,000 General Nature Center Display cases, tables, wall units. 5) 3,000 Rev. Sharing Pk. Mtnce Building.security system. 6) 1,3500 Rev. Sharing:Vehicles & Equip Weed sprayer. 7) 15,500 Planning Planning .Projects Consultant fees to finish Land Planning Act requirements4p 8) 95680 Water Surcharge. Water Distrib. Telemetry systema 9) 483,:900 Sewer Sewer Mtnce. Telemetry system. 10 6 045 V.E.M. Vehicles & Equip. Installation of flushing equip. on sewer jetting machine. $997605 Total Authorization is requested for the appropriate 1979 and 1980 Budget. adjustments to - .pro-- .vide for the above listing of -carry over items MEMORANDUM TO City Manager it . -j :.,:_ _.. _ ... . ....,......�.....,.�,_..� FROM* Finance Director RE Carry Over of 1979 Budget Monies to 1980 '~ DATE: February 13, 1980? t�'.�.....:.. It has been past practice to permit the carry over of unspent monies for specific purposes from one year to the next. This involves reductions in.the .1979 Budget and corresponding increases in the 1980 Budget . The proposed carry overs involve six different funds and have the following effect on the 1979 Budget: LESS BUDGETED PROPOSED REVISED ACTUAL AMOUNT OVER FUND EXPENDITURES CARRY OVERS BUDGET EXPENDITURES (UNDER) BUDGE General $3,92153.20 .$14,980 $359065340 $35712,147. $(.1945193) Revenue Sharing 5185895 .45500 .5145395 4221,911 ( 91,484) Planning 42,090 155500 26$90 24,021 ( 25569) Water Surcharge- 34,990 95680 255310 185350 ( 61960) Sewer 983,500 485900 9345600. 906,775 ('275825) V..E. M. 2585405, 613045 252,360. 2151,993 ( 36,367) TOTALS $53,7595200 $99,605 $5,6593,595 $5,300,197 $(359,398). It should be noted the total of actual expenditures above is less -than the revised. budget amounts. Budgeted and actual revenues for the above funds were as follows: BUDGETED ACTUAL AMOUNT OVER FUND REVENUES REVENUES (UNDER) BUDGET. General $355785905 $3,5879'43'6 $ 85531 Revenue Sharing 3325650 3195667 (125983) Planning 305850 28,280 ( 25570) Water Surcharge 1325470 145 705 13,2.35 Sewer 9393860 9715917 321P057 V.E.M. 329'3,880 2935514 (36 , 366) TOTALS $55344,615 $5,346.5519 $ .15904 A -comparison of revenues and expenditures for each of the above funds indicates that there are sufficient monies available for all of the proposed carry overs. The following is a detailed listing of the proposed carry overs: Amount Fund Functions Purpose 1)",$ 2050 350 General Elections Supplemental financing for the purchase of two additional voting machines. 2) 220 General Emer . Preparedness Office equipment. 3) 11,410 General Emer. Prepa •edness Warning sirens. 4) 1,000 General Nature Center Display cases, tables, wall units. 5) 3,000 Rev. Sharing Pk. Mtnce Building.security system. 6) 1,3500 Rev. Sharing:Vehicles & Equip Weed sprayer. 7) 15,500 Planning Planning .Projects Consultant fees to finish Land Planning Act requirements4p 8) 95680 Water Surcharge. Water Distrib. Telemetry systema 9) 483,:900 Sewer Sewer Mtnce. Telemetry system. 10 6 045 V.E.M. Vehicles & Equip. Installation of flushing equip. on sewer jetting machine. $997605 Total Authorization is requested for the appropriate 1979 and 1980 Budget. adjustments to - .pro-- .vide for the above listing of -carry over items MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager Barry R. .Evans FROM: E.P. Director Clifford Mottaz SUBJECT: Carry-over of Funds In reference to the memorandum from. the Finance Director regarding the carry --over of funds which. was limited to Capital Outlay, and due to certain circumstances, I 'respectfully.request exception to the' f o11owing items 125.4240 - Uniforms & Clothing-- amount $2,273.44 We inquired about certain various sizes in jackets and shirts .for Reserves and Cadets and were awaiting shipment of same to the :dealer. Because of the uncertainty of ability to supply, the funds were not. encumbered We are requesting carry --over of $1,800.00 of above sum. 125-4480 - Fees for Services - amount $131037.75 125--4390 -- Travel & Training -- amount 975.06 The above two items are monies that are planned for the licens-- ing and training. of reserve officers under the Peace .Officers Standards and Training regulations. We were to have started in November of 1979 but were given an extension of time in order to complete the entire training and testing procedure, Therefore, we are requesting the.carry-over of the entire amount to cover these expenses in part I appreciate your consideration in this matter. 2/14/80 A c -. i vii. by :. rt Dat ea