HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981 08-06 City Council PacketAGENDA
Maplewood City Council
7:00 P.M., Thursday, August 6, 1981
Municipal Administration Building
Meeting 81 -18
(A) CALL TO ORDER
(B) ROLL CALL
(C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes 81 -10 (May 21)
(D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA
(E) CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by
the City Council and will be enacted by one motion in the form.listed below.
There will be no separate discussion on these items. If discussion is de-
sired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be con-
sidered separately.
1. Accounts Payable
2, Budget Transfer
3, Time Extension: Preliminary Plat - Crestview Third Addition
4. Time Extension: Preliminary Plat - Arlington Properties
5. Signal System: White Bear Avenue at County Road B and at Cope Avenue
6. Southlawn Drive: Contract Amendment No. 1
7. Budget Transfer: Emergency Repairs
(E -A) 1. Award to Officer Daniel Mettler by Westinghouse Security Systems
2. Appointment: Community Design Review Board
(F) PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Special Use Permit: 2696 Hazelwood Avenue (.Health Resources) (_7:00)
2. Board of Adjustments and Appeals:
a. Minutes
b. Sign Variance: 2696 Hazelwood (Health Resources) (7:00)
3. Alley Vacation: Anitzberger (_7:15)
4. Board of Adjustments and Appeals:
a. Variance: 1404 Cope Avenue (Cernhous) (,7:30)
5. PUD /preliminary plat: Acorn Greenhouses (Votel Realty) (7:45)
(G) AWARD OF BIDS y°
1. Ripley Avenue -- Watermai n Improvement
{
2. Keller Parkway -- Sanitary Sewer Improvement
(H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Preliminary
rel imi nary Plat: Gonzalez Addition
20 Plan Amendment /lot division: Woodl nn Avenue (Nettleton) Y
3.
Billboard Ordinance
(I) VISITOR PRESENTATION
(J) NEW
BUSINESS
1,
Special Exception: 1758
Clarence St. Johnson
2,
Special Exception: 1780
Ruth Street (Krueger)
3.
Plan Update review
4.
St.' Paul Plan review
5.
Hillwood Drive & Dorland
Road Project 78 -10
6.
Infiltration and Inflow
Analysis Grant
7.
True Value Hardware Storm Water
80
Industrial Revenue Note:
J -Mont, Inc. (Co. Rd. D
s
(K) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
(L) ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
(M) ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7 :30 P.M., Thursday, May 21, 1981
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 81 -11
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council
Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Greavu.
B. ROLL CALL
John C. Greavu, Mayor Present
Norman G. Anderson, Councilman Present
Gary W. Bastian, Councilman Present
Frances L. Juker, Councilperson Present
Earl L. Nelson, Councilman Present
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
None.
D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Greavu moved to approve the agenda as amended
1. Vending Merchants Ordinance
2. Letter to Beam Avenue Residents
3. Ordinance Review
4. Vermin Destruction Permit
5. Carver Lake
6. Street Lights
7. Burlington Northern Easements
Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all.
E. CONSENT AGENDA
Council removed Consent Agenda E -2 to become Item J -8.
Councilman Nelson moved, seconded by Councilperson Juker, Ayes - all, to approve Consent
Agenda Items 1, 3 and 4 as recommended
1. Accounts Payable
Approved the accounts payable (Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses, Check No. 005774 thru
Check No. 005816, $116,674.90; Check No. 009985 thru Check No. 010101 - $311,762.99: Part
II - Check No. 01498 thru Check No. 01618 - $54,436.95) in the amount of $482,874.84.
3. Diseased Shade Tree Program - Project 80 -6 Assessment Roll
Resolution No. 81 -5 -95
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, will meet in
the Council Chambers, in the Municipal Building, at 1380 Frost Avenue, 7:00 p.m. C.D.S.T.,
- 1 - 5/21
on July 16, 1981, to hear all persons concerning the adoption of the assessment roll for
Public Improvement Project No. 80 -6, Shade Tree Disease Control Program, and to adopt the
assessment roll for Public Improvement Project No. 80 -6, Shade Tree Disease Control Program,
and to adopt the assessment roll as presented or amended. This hearing is scheduled pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The assessment roll as herein described is on file
in the office of the City Clerk.
All persons who wish to be heard, or to object, with reference to this matter
may present their cases at this hearing, either orally or in writing.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to M.S.A. Section 429.081
by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk of the City of Maplewood
within thirty (30) days after the adoption of the assessment and by filing such notice
with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or City Clerk.
DEFERMENT OF ASSESSMENTS: Under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section
435.193 to 435.195 the City may, at its discretion, defer the payment of assessments
for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would
be a hardship to make the payments. The procedures for applying for such deferment
are available from the City Clerk.
Area to be assessed is within the corporate limits of the City of Maplewood.
Dated this 21st day of May, 1981.
/s/ Lucille E. Aurelius
City Clerk
4. Change Order: Beam Avenue Improvements — Project 78 -24
Resolution No. 81 -5 -96
WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, has heretofore ordered made
Improvement Project No. 78 -24 and has let a construction contract therefore pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429; and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and sup—
plemented by an additional payment of $4,780.00;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that
the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to supplement the existing
contract by $4,780.00 payable to the contractor, C.W. Houle, Inc.
F. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Mining Permit: Hazelwood and Beam — Korstad 7:00 P.M.
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request
of Mr. William Korstad to continue excavating and grading of a 66 acre site to
an elevation of one foot above street elevation. The property is located at the
northeast corner of Hazelwood Avenue and Beam Avenue.
b. Manager Evans presented the staff report -.
C. Director of Community Development Geoff Olson presented the Planning Commission
recommendation:
— 2 — 5/21
"Commissioner Whitcomb moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council
approval of a special use permit for mineral excavation on a 66 acre site, located
at the northeast corner of Beam and Hazelwood Avenues, subject to:
1. Submission and approval of a final grading plan for the easterly 2/3's of the
site. This grading plan shall provide for approximately 13 acre /feet of storm
water storage capacity between elevation 910 and 916 in the northeast corner
of the site.
2. Adherence to the requirements and standards set forth in Section 917 (Mineral.
Extraction) of City Code.
3. In accordance with Section 917.060 (4), annual mineral extraction permits must
be obtained from the Director of Public Works. A plan for each year's operation
shall be approved by the City Engineer. Annual permits shall designate the
area and total acreage to be excavated.
4. All excavation shall be in accordance with each year's approved plan. No devi—
ations shall be allowed without prior approval from Director of Public Works.
5. There shall be no explosive detonations of any kind on the site.
6. A suitable structure or method of operation must be employed to remove excess
dirt from truck bodies and tires prior to exiting onto a public right —of —way.
7. A sediment basin shall be constructed by the Applicant and approved by the
City Engineer, to filter all storm water runoff from the active mining site.
8. Truck hauling shall be prohibited on Hazelwood Avenue north of the site.
Approval is recommended on the basis that:
1. The use is consistent with Maplewood's Codes and would not hinder future develop—
. ment plans. -
2. Excavation and grading of the site are required to prepare for future development.
3. Excavation and sale of the site's sand and gravel deposits to prepare the site
for future development is in the public interest.
Commissioner Pellish seconded. Ayes — all."
d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. The following were heard:
Mr. Frank Frattalone, Frattalone Excavating, stated he was doing the excavating
and he did not agree with the condition regarding the sediment pond (condition
no. 1).
Mr. William Korstad, 20 Red Fox Road, North Oaks, owner of the property, spoke
on behalf of the proposal.
e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard.
f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
g. Councilman Bastian moved to approve the special use permit for mineral extraction
at the Northeast corner of Beam and Hazelwood as requested by William Korsta ,
— 3 — 5/21
subject to the following conditions
1. Submission and approval of a final grading plan for the easterly 2/3's of the
site. This grading plan shall provide for approximately 13 acre /feet of storm
water storage capacity between elevation 910 and 916 in the northeast corner
of the site.
2. Adherence to the requirements and standards set forth in Section 917 (mineral
extraction) of City Code.
3. In accordance with Section 917.060 (4), annual mineral extraction permits
must be obtained from the Director of Public Works. A plan for each year's
operation shall be approved by the City Engineer. Annual .permits shall designate
the area and total acreage to be excavated.
4. All excavation shall be in accordance with each year's approved plan. No
deviations shall be allowed without prior approval from Director of Public Works.
5. There shall be no explosive detonations of any kind on the site.
6. A suitable structure or method of operation must be employed to remove excess
dirt from truck bodies and tires prior to exiting onto a public right -of-
way.
7. A sediment basin shall be constructed by the Applicant and approved by the
City Engineer, to filter all storm water runoff from the active mining site.
8. Truck hauling shall be prohibited on Hazelwood Avenue north of the site.
Approval is recommended on the basis that:
1. The use is consistent with Maplewood's Codes and would not hinder future develop-
ment plans.
2. Excavation and grading of the site are required to prepare for future development.
3. Excavation and sale of the site's sand and gravel deposits to prepare the
site for future development is in the public interest.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu.
G. AWARD OF BIDS
None.
H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Feasibility Study Resolution
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
Ayes - all.
b. Councilman Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
81 - 5 - 97
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota,
as follows:
- 4 - 5/21
WHEREAS, the cost of making feasibility studies for public improvements has
steadily risen; and
WHEREAS, the City can no longer pay for said feasibility studies from general
funds collected under the tax levy limits; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary that the City be reimbursed for the cost of such
feasibility studies,
IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED as follows:
1. That henceforth the City will not undertake or expend effort in completing
a feasibility study except under the following terms and conditions:
a) That an applicant or developer and /or the petitioners for a feasibility
study pay to the City the full amount of the cost of such study as estimated
by the City Engineer. -
b) That if the project is found to be not feasible or is not ordered by the
City, the sum paid as provided in a) above shall be used and applied to the
cost of preparing the feasibility study and shall not be returned to the parties
paying said sum.
c) That if the project is found to be feasible and is ordered by the City,
the sum paid as in a) above shall be included as a cost of the overall project.
The City may, at its option, upon sale of bonds for the project reimburse
the party or parties having paid said funds or credit these funds to the overall
cost of the project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this policy shall remain in effect from and after
its formal adoption and until further action by the Council of the City of
Maplewood.
Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes — all.
2. Planning Commission's Role in Revenue Note Review
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
b. Councilman Anderson moved that based on the Planning Commission report, the
Planning Commission's role in reviewing revenue notes be discontinued.
Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes — all.
3. Critical Area Regulations — Ordinance — Second Reading
a. Manager Evans stated the ordinance was adopted for first reading and final
adoption is recommended.
b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption
ORDINANCE NO. 503
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 918 AND 1004 OF THE
MAPLEWOOD CODE RELATING TO THE CRITICAL AREA OVERLAY
DISTRICT AND PLATTING CODE
— 5 — 5/21
THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. SECTION 918.050 of the Maplewood Code is hereby amended by adding
new subparagraphs 23 and 24, to read as follows:
23. Bluffline — a line delineating a top of a slope with direct drainage
to the Mississippi River or Fish Creek, connecting the points at which
the slope becomes less than 18 percent. (More than one bluffline may
be encountered proceeding landward from the river).
24. Park Dedication Fee — as defined in Section 211.010 of the City Code.
SECTION 2. SECTION 918.110 of the Maplewood Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
918.110. SITE PLAN APPROVAL STANDARDS.. No site plan which fails to satisfy
the following standards shall be approved by the City Council or Director of Com—
munity Development.
A. No development shall be permitted on slopes of 18 percent or greater which
are in direct drainage to the Mississippi River Bluffs or Fish Creek.
(Refer to map on file with the Director of Community Development.)
B. In areas not in direct drainage to the Mississippi River Bluffs or Fish
Creek, no development shall be allowed on slopes greater than 40 percent.
(Refer to map on file with the Director of Community Development.)
C. No development, whether or not in direct drainage to the Mississippi River
Bluffs or Fish Creek, shall be permitted on land having a slope, before
alteration, in excess of 12 percent unless the applicant proves the follow—
ing conditions are met:
(1) The foundation and underlaying material of any structure, including
roads, shall adequate for the slope condition and soil type.
(2) Adequate controls and protections exist uphill from the proposed
development such that there is no danger of structures or roads being
struck by falling rock, mud, uprooted trees, or other materials.
(3) The proposed development presents no danger of falling rock, mud,
uprooted trees, or other materials to structures downhill.
(4) The view of the developed slope from the river and opposite river—
bank is consistent with the natural appearance of the undeveloped
slope, consistent with any historic areas nearby, compatible with
the view from historic areas, and compatible with surrounding architect—
ural features. To the maximum extent possible, the use of natural
devices, including vegetation management shall be preferred over
the construction of artificial devices, including culverts, holding
ponds, walls, and terracing.
(5) All other structures other than buildings and roadway surfaces, but
including retaining walls shall meet the following design requirements:
(a) retaining walls or terrace contours shall not exceed five feet
in height;
—6— 5/21
(b) construction materials shall be subject to Community Deisgn
Review Board approval;
(c) the minimum space in between terraces and retaining walls shall
be twenty feet.
(6) Any lift stations required to service the slope development with
local sewer systems are designed in accordance with local design
standards and approved by the City Engineer. The applicant shall
furnish a satisfactory arrangement or agreement by which the cost
of maintenance and operation of the lift station are borne by those
serviced by the facility.
(7) No septic tank shall be placed on a slope of greater than 12 %. The
natural slope may not be altered in any way where the septic tank
system or part thereof is to be located. The drain lines shall be
located parallel to contour lines.
D. The applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed development shall be planned,
designed, constructed and maintained to avoid substantial probabilities of:
(1) accelerated erosion
(2) pollution, contamination, or siltation of water bodies, rivers and streams
(3) damage to vegetation
(4) injury to wildlife habitats
(5) increased flood potential
(6) decreased ground water recharge
E. The applicant shall demonstrate that the types and densities of land use proposed
shall be suited to the site and soil conditions and shall not present a threat
to the maintenance of the groundwater quality, a potential increase in maintenance
costs of utilities, parking areas, or roads, and shall not be subject to problems
due to soil, limitations, including, but not limited to soil bearing strength,
shrink /swell potential, and excessive frost movement..
F. All new structures and roads shall be placed no closer than 40 feet from a
bluffline. Exceptions shall be:
(1) Public recreation facilities, scenic overlooks, public "observation"
platforms, or public trail systems
(2) The construction of above — ground pumping stations for sewer lines, such
stations shall be screened from view from the river.
(3) Other development, when the applicant can conclusively demonstrate that
neither construction of final development will negatively impact slopes
with a grade of 18 percent or greater.
G.. Development shall be accomplished only in such a manner that on —site gross
soil loss levels shall not exceed five(5) tons per acre per year during construct—
ion, but only two (2) tons per acre per year when the site is adjacent to
a water body or water course and 0.5 tons per acre per year after construction
— 7— 5/21
activities are completed.
H. Development shall not substantially diminish the scientific, historical, ed-
ucational, recreational or aesthetic value of natural areas and unique plant
and animal species, and shall not substantially alter the reproductive cycle
of the species.
I. Erosion protection measures shall make maximum use of natural inplace vegetation
rather than the placing of new vegetation on site as erosion control facilities.
The use of natural erosion control devices shall be preferred to the maximum
extent over the construction of artificial drainage devices including culverts,
holding ponds, and ditches.
J. The development shall be located in such a manner as to minimize the removal
of vegetation and alteration of the natural topography.
K. The applicant shall demonstrate that there are no feasible or prudent alternatives
to cutting trees on the site: development shall be permitted only in such
a manner that the maximum number of trees shall be preserved. No trees may
be cut except those occupying the actual physical space in which a structure,
drive or raodway is to be erected. In the event that solor collection is
utilized, trees may be cut to allow sufficient sunlight to the solar collectors
if the applicant can demonstrate there are no feasible or prudent alternatives.
If trees are cut, the density of trees shall be restored to that which existed
before development, but in no case shall the applicant be required to raise
the density above 10 trees per acre. The applicant shall demonstrate that
all grading which takes place will be conducted in a manner that preserves
the roof zone aeration and stability of existing trees and provides an adequate
watering area equal to at least one -half of each tree's crown cover.
L. Development in woodlands shall not reduce the existing crown cover greater
than 50 percent and shall be conducted in such a manner that the understory
and litter is preserved.
M. Fishing in a wetland shall not exceed the excess storage and nutrient stripping
capacities of the wetland based on the ultimate projected development of the
wetland watershed. Flood storage and nutrient stripping capacities shall
be calculated in accordance with Appendix B.
N. Wetlands and other water . bodies shall not be used as primary sediment traps
during or after construction.
0. The proposed development will not increase the runoff rate or decrease the
natural rate of absorption of stormwater.
P. The qaulity of water runoff and water infiltrated to the water table or aquifer
shall be as high after development as it was before development of the site.
Q. When filling in awetland, a minimum amount of filling may be allowed when necessary
but in no case shall the following restrictions on total amount of filling
be exceeded. Since the total amount of filling which can be permitted is
limited, the City of Maplewood, when considering permit applications, shall
consider the equal apportionment of fill opportunity to riparian land owners.
(1) Total filling shall not cause the total natural flood storage capacity
of the wetland to fall below the projected volume of runoff from the
- 8- 5/21
whole developed wetland watershed generated by a 6 rainfall in 24 hours.
Any increase in runoff must be detained for on-site infiltration through
the soil to the water table.
(2) Total filling shall not cause the total natural nutrient stripping capacity
of the wetland to fall below the nutrient production of the wetland watershed
for its projected development.
(3) Only fill free of chemical pollutants and organic wastes may be used.
R. No part of any septic tank system shall be located closer than 150 feet from
the edge of a water body or water course unless it can be shown that no effluent
will directly or indirectly reach the water body, water course or wetland.
S. The grades of any streets shall not exceed 10 percent.
T. Any and all erosion control, stormwater runoff, utility access, and similar
structures shall be designed to be maintained, cleaned out, and otherwise operated
without requiring the crossing of private lands . with or the operation of motorized
heavy maintenance vehicles and equipment, such as bulldozers, trucks, and back -
hoes on slopes in excess of 8 percent. As used in this section, private lands
includes any out -lots.
U. The proposed development, both vehicular and pedestrian, shall be adequate
and consistent with local transportation and thoroughfare planning.
V. The proposed development shall not lessen public access to and along the river
bluff, nor does it lessen public opportunity to view the river from within
the corridor.
W. Development proposed along the Fish Creek Corridor shall be subject to the
provisions of the City's Flood Plain Ordinance.
X. The conduct of all grading landscaping, structure placement, and street routing
shall be consistent with and to the maximum extent in furtherance of the goals
and policies for the development of the river corridor adopted by the City
of Maplewood on March 1, 1979
SECTION 3. SECTION 918.170 is amended to read as follows:
SECTION 918.170 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.- The guidelines set forth in 6MCAR4.8040
(formerly WPC 40) shall serve as the minimum standards and criteria for the design,
location, installation, use and maintenance of individual sewage treatment systems.
SECTION 4. SECTIONS 918.170 (Maintenance Requirements) and 918.180 (Alternative
Systems) are renumbered to Sections 918.180 and 918.190, respectively.
SECTION 5. SECTION 1004.080 of the City Platting Code is hereby amended by adding
a new subsection (3), to read as follows:
(e) Within the legal boundaries of the City's designated Critical Area the City
Council may require dedication for public open space or scenic easement,
blufflands which are 18 percent or greater in slope and which are in direct
drainage to the Mississippi River Bluffs or Fish Creek. The City Council
may release the developer in part or in total from a park dedication fee in
lieu of the value of the above dedicated blufflands -.
- 9 - 5/21
SECTION 6. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication.
Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes - all.
4. Easement: Four Seasons Park
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
b. Mr. Joseph Zappa, 2225 Flandrau Street, adjacent property owner, spoke regarding
the easement.
Mrs. John Oswald, an adjacent property owner, spoke regarding the easement.
C. Councilman Bastian moved to table this matter.
Seconded by Councilman Anderson.
Councilman Anderson moved an amendment to the motion and
out surveys to the area to see exactly how many people a
Park.
Seconded by Councilman Nelson.
Voting on original motion.
5. Lion's Bingo Permit Revision Request
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
staff to send
Four Seasons
Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Council-
person Juker, Councilmen
Anderson and Nelson.
Nays - Councilman Bastian.
Ayes - all.
b. Mr. Howard Erickson and Mr. Clare Zuercher, members of the North Maplewood
Lions Club, spoke regarding reasons for thier request.
C. Councilman Bastian moved to table this item and instruct staff
an ordinance and forward such ordinance to persons holding bingo 1
their reactions.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
I. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
1. Beam Avenue, West of Maplewood Drive
a. Several of the residents on Beam Avenue expressed their concerns regarding
the problems they are experiencing due to the sanitary sewer construction and
because of Mr. VoyaPiletich's grading and hauling of dirt. -
b. Councilman Bastian moved that before a new permit is issued to Mr. Piletich,
it comes before the Council for discussion and conditions.
Seconded by Councilperson Juker.
Councilman Bastian withdrew his motion.
to prepare
tenses to obtain
- 10 - 5/21
C. Councilman Nelson moved that because of health reasons and gross inconvenience
and trouble to the_Q owners along the street that grading and hauling oper-
ations be stopped immediately until we have a meeting at 7:30 on May 28, 1981
to hear the matter. The hauling company is also to be present, as well as Mr.
Piletich. This motion is based on observation of the Council as well as persons
who appeared here this evening.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu.
J. NEW BUSINESS
1. Paramedic Bill: Cancellation Request
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
b. Councilman Bastian moved to
service charges of Dorothy Boll
Seconded by Mayor Greavu
2. Donations: Heritage Center
er.
Ayes - all.
AR
Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmen Anderson, Bastian
and Nelson.
Nays - Councilperson Juker.
a. Councilman Bastian moved to accept the $100.00 donation from the Maplewood
Coin Club designated to the Maplewood Heritage House and instructed the staff
Seconded by Councilperson Juker. Ayes - all.
3. Double and Quad Dwelling Design Ordinance (lst Reading)
a.. Manger Evans stated Council gave first reading to this ordinance on May 6,
1980 and denied the ordinance on second reading on March 20, 1980. Since that
time, Councilwoman Juker has requested that this be placed on the agenda for re-
consideration.
b. Councilman Anderson moved first readi
of Ouads and Double Dwellines.
of an ordinance to regulate the de
Seconded by Councilperson Juker. Ayes — Mayor Greavu; Councilperson Juker, Councilman
Anderson.
Nays - Councilmen Bastian and Nelson.
4. Dog Ordinance Review
a. Councilperson Juker stated she has had several complaints from residents regarding
dogs barking continually during the day.
b. Councilman Bastian moved that Councilperson Juker draft an ordinance that
Council can review and present to Council by the first of July.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu.. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmen Anderson, Bastian
and Nelson.
Nays - Councilperson Juker.
- 11 - 5/21
5. Sterling Street, Holloway Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
b. Councilman Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its
ion:
WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve Sterling Street from Holloway Avenue to
Larpenteur Avenue by reconstruction of the roadway and to assess the benefited
property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,. MINNESOTA:
that the proposed improvement is referred to the City Engineer for study and
that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed,
advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement
is feasible, and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connect—
ion with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement
as recommended.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes — all.
6. Beam Aenue Paving: Joint Proposal
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
81 -5 -99
WHEREAS, it is deemed necessary, expedient, and proper to participate with
the City of North St. Paul in the overlay of Beam Avenue from Indian Way to
Second Street;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
that the sum of $5,500,00 from the budgeted Contingency fund be used to defray
the cost of overlaying Beam Avenue from Indian Way to Second Street in cooper-
ation with the City of North St. Paul.,.
Seconded by Councilman Nelson.
7. Frank McGinley Presentation
Ayes - all.
a. Mr. Frank McGinley, 2044 Prosperity Road, voiced his concerns about the
staff and Council not using the microphones. He stated the audience can't
hear anything.
b. No action taken.
8. Out of City Canine Team Requests
- a. Manager Evans stated recently we have received requests for police assistance
involving our canine teams. The communities we have assisted usually have
mutual aid agreements with our department. An excellent spirit of cooperation
exists between our department and the other departments in the area. They
- 12 - 5/21
often assist us on calls, and we, in turn, assist them. However, in some instances,
we have had to call our canine team on duty and pay them overtime.
In view of the foregoing, the police staff recommends the following fee schedule
be authorized by the City Council:
Charge for on duty canine teams to adjoining municipalities of White Bear,
North St. Paurl,Oakdale and Woodbury - none.
Charge for on duty canine teams to non - adjoining municipalities - $15 per
hour per team.,
Charge for on -duty or call out teams to municipalities able to reciprocate
- none.
Charge for call out teams to municipalities that cannot or will not reciprocate
- $20 per hour per team, three -hour minimum.
In addition, staff recommends a mileage charge of $.40 per mile be charged.
b. Councilperson Juker moved to approve the rates for the City's Canine team
as recommended in the Manager's report
Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes.- all.
K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Vending Machine Ordinance
a. Continued to a future meeting.
2. Beam Avenue
a. Discussed under I - Visitor Presnetations.
3. Ordinance Review
a.. Councilman Anderson stated Council should review the complete City Ordinances.
4. Cable TV
a. Councilman Anderson reported on the Cable TV Commission meeting.
5. Vermin Destruction Permit
a. Councilman Bastian stated he had received complaints regarding the damage
being done by rabbits. Instructed staff to investigate some type of permit to
allow citizens to kill the rabbits.
6. Carver Lake
a. Mayor Greavu stated he had received complaints regarding motorized boats on
Carver Lake.
7. Street Lights
- 13 - 5/21
a. Mayor Greavu requested staff to investigate placing a street light on the
cul de sac of Meyer Court.
L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Burlington Northern Easements
a. City Attorney Bannigan stated there is a necessity to obtain some hydrant
and water main easements from Burlington Northern within Project 78 -9. Burlington
Northern has granted the easements but the Council has to authorize acceptance
and also the payment of $500.00 to cover their costs and surveys, etc.
b. Councilman Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
81 - 5 - 100
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota,
as follows:
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood requires certain easements for its Water Improve-
ment Project 78 -9 for the construction and maintenance of an 8 -inch water main
and fire hydrant maintenance area; and
WHEREAS, the property whereon the City proposes to construct and maintain
such water main and fire hydrants is owned by Burlington Northern, Inc.; and
WHEREAS, Burlington Northern, Inc.. proposes to grant to the City of Maplewood
an easement for the above expressed purposes, upon and across the following des-
cribed premises, situated in Ramsey County, State of Minnesota, to wit:
Those portions of the South 4 feet of the North 37 feet of the Northeast
Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (NE 1/4 SE 1/4) of Section 16, Township 29,
Range 22 East, Fifth Principal Meridian, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described
as follows:
1. The West 14 feet of the East 607 feet of said Northeast Quarter of
the Southeast Quarter (NE 1/4 SE 1/4) of Section 16.
2. The West 14 feet of the East 907 feet of said Northeast Quarter of
the Southeast Quarter (NE 1/4 SE 1/4) of Section 16.
3. The West 14 feet of the East 1,207.feet of the Northeast Quarter of
the Southeast Quarter (NE 1/4 SE 1/4) of Section 16.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
That the City Council accepts the conveyance of said easements by Burlington
Northern, Inc. and authorizes the City Manager to pay Five Hundred and no /100ths
($500.00) Dollars as consideration for said grant of easement over the above des-
cribed property, and directs its City Attorney to record this easement with the
Ramsey County Recorder.
Seconded by Councilman Nelson.
Ayes - all.
- 14 - 5/21
ADJOURNMENT
9:40 P.M.
City Clerk
- 15 - 5/21
X11
's
CITY CF MAPLE WOOD
CHECK* A M O U N T
006043
763.37
006044
-- 378.35
00604.5
2,140.41
006G46
127.00
C 06 047
5900
OC6048
44.00
OC6149
250.00
006050 :;
1
0016351 .;
5090'
036052
1
006353
58.00
0 C 6 054
150,803
006055 ::
763.00
006056
141.00
0 0 6 U5 T
1 75 5 9 04
00605
3,Ewa.4
306059 89053997
006 1,5939 00
006061 150000
C 0 6 062 30.50
000363 27.00
00636+ 20.00
A C C O U N T S P A Y A 8 L£
C L A I M A N T
CONN GENERAL LIFE INS CO
CONN GENERAL LIFE I.NS CO
MINN STATE TREASURER
MINN STATE TREASURER
ASSN CF MET RCFCLI TAN
RA MSE Y CO CLEi%'K OF DI ST
,.IOE SHO W PRODUCTIONS
GOPHER FIRE WORKS
PAUL GI BS ON
MINN STATE TREASURER
MIND STATE TREASUR
UNITE - 0 WAY -ST PAUL. AREA
4N REC } PARKS Assoc
MINN STATE TREASURER
MN STATE TREA SURER -;PER
MN STATE TREASURER - PEPA
MN STATE TREA SU ER -PERA
MINN STATE TREASURER
MINN STATE TREASURER
CA T'=,0 L NELSON
MN POLICE COI EAT
E.MP BENEFIT PLANS INC
CATS 08 -06 -8i pAGE
P U R P O S E
CO NTRI OUTI ONS, I NSW RA
CONTRIBUTIONS, I NSU R A
OE PO SI TS -D£PUT Y REGI-
STATE G/L FEES PAYAB
- - TP'tiAVFL f TRAINING
CN TY ?/L FEES PAY A 3
FEES, SERVICE
July 4th activities
SU PPLI S, PROGRAM
FEES , SERVICE
July 4th activities
CEPOSI T�-CEFUTY REGI
CN TY C/L FEES PAY A 9
UN IT E3 FUND DE0 PA YA
FEES, SERVICE'
Entry fee - softball
ONR LICENSE FEE'S PBL
CO N T RI BUT I O NS, PER A
P. E.R.A. 0E.0 PAYABLL
ANQ CONTRIBUTIONS,
P 9 L. R9 A. DEC P AYAr3 LE
AND - CONTRIBUTIONS, f
OEFOSITS- CEPUTY REGI
STATE D/L FEES PAY A r
REFUND - INSURANCE C
TrRAVEL } TRAINING
REFUND - INSURANCE C
4ITY OF
MAPLEWOOD
A C C Q U N t S P A Y A 9 L E
O -r _ _ .-
08 06 81 PAG'
CHECK
A M 0 U N T
C A I N A N T
P U R
006065
1 � fl OQ. Ofl
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT CLAIMS
CEPOSI TS WITH I H F ISO A
Q.
. INk STATE Tic �ASUR
0E P0 -
SI TS Of.PUT Y R G
006067
11$.00
MINN STATE TREAS
STATE D/L FEES PAYA
VALLEY TOURS
006069
F � �
� Get - - way ES q SERVICE
als
_ a2�.00 _..
MIN$ STATE. TREA -- --
- 0E P4 TS -a P_
EPUTY REG
006370
20000
.
MINN STATE -
E TREASURER
STATE D/L FEE s PaYa
006071
i8. 0D
.RA -- - . _- -- -. - --
EY CTY CcNCiLIATI0N
A /R- - PARA� T
�EDi C
0 06072
- 1,2fl0.00
PO TMA `-
S STIR...
POSTAGE
00637,3
3, 0 64, 50
MAPLELEAF OF FICIALS ASSN
F E.S, S; PVICE
006074
" 368. j0
- - _
NAPLELEAF .1
CF. .
F ICIAL� ASSN
Umpire fees - Softball
t ES E9 I CE
u Vl
ly �+t
0 0 6075
l f436, 66
MINN STATE TREA SURER
tournament
-
Or FU S j T E- C E PUT Y R E G
0
171.00
MINN STATE E
TREASUR..R
STA # E D/L FEES .
PAYA►
II0607 7
55.50
t�AMS,EY C. _
0 CLERK OF DI ST
CN TY 0 /1. FEES PAPA .
006378
T T 5. T 5
Mi NN STATE TREASUPER
DEPOSITS- CEPUTY '
iRE G .
006079
152.03
MINN STATE TREASURER
STATE D/L F f
F EES PA Y A .,
006380
435.47
-- --
MINN STATE TREAS- SURT. Ax
SURCH RG'�
A = TAx PAYA gL
006081
E,3iJL .25
METRO wA".3TE CCNTROL CCmN
-
S.A.C. =AYABL=
0 c 6 U 8 2
Tg. Oa
MI NN STATE TREASU -
r.
+ N E
.
25 * 00
8F.00K AT, N S P �
G OLIC� PI STOL
TQ AvEL } TRAINI
006084 ::
125. 30
M ..
AURICE WEINBLA TT
WAGE T
006085
7 Qfl
,, � - -- - - - -._
LAIS BANNIGAN CIRE
FEES - -
♦ SERV
_ _ --
AND -LEGAL FISCAL
May
C HECK*
A M C U N T
C L A I M A N T
U R P 0 S E
006386
i
29023.00
MINN STATE TREASURER
DEPOSITS - DEPUTY RE GI
006087
- - 226.00 -
MINN STATE TREASURER- .__.______ _- _._
_._ -__ _ -- STATE- D/L FEES PAY AS
006083
269480.58
TOTAL ASPHALT
AWARDED CCNST CONT
006089
49, 659.66
C. W. HGULE
AWARDE L CONS CONTRA
�0b�19 ..-
----- - - - -.- 75.0 _..
PA�iL AAG -.� -- - - -- _ __ -- - -- ----
- -. - -- WAGE a/T # TEMP.
Q O6 091
16 2. C4
ICMQ RETIREMENT CORD
0 F =RED COMP MAYA BL
- - - - -- - - - -
- -- _. - -- ---- - - - - --
AN tI —GE FERR EG C OM N
006392
203. JO
P
MN STATt RETIREMENT SYST
DEFERRED COMP PAYA B6
006093
17, 288.63
HiLLCREST MID AMERICA
FED INCOME TAX GAY A;
006094
_ 6
3TAT. E_ O. F--_ NN.-.-__
_ !I NN I NCOME TAX PA V
006095
291068
AFSCME LOCA4. 2725
UNI CN DUES SAYABLE
AND -- F A I P. SHARE FEES
006 096
21.00%
METRC SUPE2VI SCRY ASS OC
UNI CN DU=S PAYABLE
006097
1391239513
CITY + CTY CRECIT UNICN
CFEDIT UNION DE0 FAQ
006098
- ._. - 145.00
ROSEMARY KANE - - - - -
WAGE GEOUCT GNS PA Yi
006399
236903
MN BENCEFIT ASSCC
MBA IN; PAYABLE
00610E
8,'77.80
LAR SON EXCAVATING
AWARLEO CCNST CONTRi
flOb10 l
139.03
MINN STATE TR EASURER _. _
_ STATE D/L FEES PAY A '
0'610 2
1, Ei 4. C O
MI STATE TREASURE-R.
OE PO SI TS - CEFUT Y RE G.
0 061.0 3
2030s 0 0
MINN STATE TREASURER
STATE O/L .FEES PAY A
O 0610 4
1
Mi yet STATE TREASURER-
DEPOSITS - CEPUT Y PEE G
006105
1820 .00
Ci.ARENCE tR MCREYNCLOS
RTF. + VAI NT •-t EQU I
006106
12.27
JULY CHLEBECK
POSTAGE
ANO -LANG, EASEMEN
i
C NE CK*
A M C U N T
C L A' I N A N T
P U R a 0 S E
r
006107
2g. 36
LA BELLES
SU PPLI ES, OFFICE
0 0610d
30 0
METRO AREA MGT ASSCC
TP AUEL + TRAINING
006109
- - 191.03
M114N STATE. TR£AS1lRE _
- -- SI AT£ G/L FEES PAY A #
0 0 6110
1 , 667.75
M I N N STATE TR EA SUP ER
DEPOSITS - CE PUT Y R E G I
006111
39.0-.
K -MART
;REP. } ?OAINT,, RADIO
006112
53.54
RANSEY CO CLE OF DZST
CNTY D/L FELS FAYAF
006113
1,590.05
MI �N STATE TREASURER
DEPOSITS- CEPUTY REG
006114
67* CO
SINN STATE TREASUR =R
STATE C/L FEES PAY A'
006115
1, 711. 51
4IN STATE TREA SURER -DERA
CONTRI BUTIONS, FORA
006116
-3 5 00. E2
MN STATE TREA SUR£R
P. E.R.A. CEO P AYAB L..
ANC -CONTR I BUTI ONS, !-,Iv
00EI17
1,080.21
MN STATE TREASURER
P.E.R.A. OED FAYABL:
Arta- -CCNTRIBUTIONS f
306.�id
ii 79, 0
� POUATA ♦N SKI AREA
FEU v S�
Alpine s�.. i A
0061i9
233. v0
t#,jNN STATE TREASUIR ER
STATE O/L FEES PAY A V'
006120
1,434 *45
MI NN STAT TREASURER
DEPOSITS- CEFUTY nLGI
006121
549. 00
M H ANDERSON
Reimbursement
79
194
;NECESSARY LX £NCITURES SINCE
LAST CCU NC IL NE =TiNG
CITY OF t"APL t H00%0
CHECK* A M C U N T
01 0564 105.00
QiG5b5
43600
010566 52.12
01 C 567
0105b F
i 0 56 S
010570
4 G �i
01& 571
01--57 2
010 573
52.75
3639 4 0
33.00
1b.00
L� �• wv
li. G0
2
010574
010575
010576
Oii;577
2.123. E0
5.10
3.5)
46.96
A C C C U =4 T S P A Y A 9 L E
C i A IM A N T
A— l R C C T MASTER DRA IN CL
ACCURA ELECTRIC
AC! HARLW AR£
M PAULIhE AOAMS
ALBRECHT LANDSCAPING
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC
ANCHOR 8�. OC K
AQUAZYME M'1
ARNALS AUTO SERVICE
ARNA S AUTO
ARTCRAFT PRESS INC
ART S I GN
ASvH ALT R OOFING MFG ASSw
LUCILLL 0-
A UREL IBS
OQTF e8 — J6 -81 PAG-
P U R P O S E
RE P. + PAI NT., BLDG*
REP. + PAINT., EQUIG
SU PFD LI ES , PROGRAM
ANC - SM ALL TOOLS
AM Q— SU FPL I ES, E CUI CIM
AND-w MAINTENANCE MA TE
B E EP . } MAI NT., ECU I
CO NT PB - R - `T PCT
SU 6S CR I pT I ONS } MEM6 Eq
�"�A IhT� hA MATERIAL
F.EEs, SE?V10E.
Chemical Toilets
REP* } MAI NT•, VEH If-
FUEL + CI,.
ANC-REP. + NAI NT. t
OU 2. lima IS RING
SU PPLI ES, e"ROGRAM
BOOKS + PE RIODICALS
TRAVEL f TRAINING
ANN- wSUPPLiES, JANI Ti
ANO SUPPLIES, OFFI C;
ANC -FE-ES, SERVICE
AND-POSTAGE'
ANC - SU FPLI PROG Rl
ANC - SUPPLI EQUi P�
cleaning service
CHECK* A M G U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P C S E
010 57 E
16. 02
THE AUSTA D COP PANY
SUPPLIES, PROGRAM
O1C57C
27•&+5
BATTERY ♦ TIRE WHS` INC
SUFPLiES, EGUIPMENT
010 - 80
7 43. u T
30A RD OF WATER COM M
MAINTE MA TERI AL
010 581
450062
EOARO OF WATER COMM
OTHER CONSTRUCTION C
010 582
3, 272.50
BOARD OF WATER COMM
O THE R CCNSTRUCTION C
017 :8 3
,133.47
BOARD CF WATER COMM
OUTSIDE ENGINEERING
p j C 584
123.47
L 80Y`R F0RC
SU PPL% ES, VEHICLE
01 C 585
12.42
BROWN PHOTO
SUPPLIES, E.GUI PMEN T
014 580
295.00
CAR^ INAL ELECTRIC jNC
SU �LOI NG I NFRO VEME Nt
013 537
249923
CARLSON EGUI PPENT CO
FEES, S RV!CE
Saw Rental
01C 588
43.35
CAM - LSON TRACTCR # EGUIP
SUFPL.iES, EGUIPMEf4T
010 5
5.00
C" NTLKR Ct' MERA
REF• f NATlrT., QUI
010590
32.24
CHAPLIN ?URLISHING
PU?LISNING
010 591
43.35
CH:FPEWA SPRINGS CC
FEES, SERVICE
Water Cooler
010:92
6,073.86
CL. L.A�DSCAFIrtG
AWARA.ED CCNST CCNTR
010593
19599933
COLLINS ELECTRICAL CONTT
RE'. * MAINT•, SLOG
0140 59
189.6b
KENNETH V COLLIN�
TRAVEL + TRAINING
s1Z95
30.13
CCMMERCIai. PLASTICS
SJPLiES, EQUIPMENT
GIC596
22E• 70
COPY OUPLiCATING PROO
OUPLIC COSTS
01C 59T
78999
COPY EQUIPMENT
SU Pr LIES, EGUILPMEN T
r 1::598
187. 57
O A UI 5 ;�A TER ;:GUI CO
'�A ItiTE NAhCE `�A TERI Al
010599
6.00
DAYTON 9t.UFF SHEET META.
MAINTENANCE MAT ERIL AL
010E00
3
EAST CGMMUNITIES FAMILY
FEES, SERV ;CE
Youth Service Bureau
semi - annual contract
m i,
1 611 T Ut-
riA tWOOO
A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A B L E
DATE 0$`06'$1 PAGE
CHECK
A M C U N T
C A I M A N T
P U R P O S E
99.
EAST CO LINE FIRE EP
0 T
FUEL ♦ U L
010602
1,353991
EA STMAN �Ct3OAK CO
_ - -- -
�UQ LICATING POSTS
D IC-60 3
30. "0
tH` .,
RGENCY VEHICLE. SUPPLY
.
4EP +
6 k
49.60
iRKKILQ t ASSCC
FEES, CCNSU T
L I NG
6. 04
DANIEL F FAUST
TRAVEL + 7R.AT
I NI N
010 606
93* JO
FISHER PH SUPPLY O TO CO
SU FPLI ES, EAU'' c
i PM�N T
Q1G SOT
1,799.42
FLEXI L% PIKE TOOL CO
SUPPLI E-S --
VEHICL=
13 5. 4 T
PET P A . __ _._
E G NTEL
_
OTHER CO NSTRUCTION :
D iD0 9
113.5 2
GEN ERA! E . �:
�._CTRIC SUPPLY
.,
SUFrLIES VEHI
CLE
31L Ei3
T. C3
GEtiETt }� c �
C QSP �UP'LY CO
SUP?LiE '' T
S, =CtI.PMENT
DiC Et1
651.00
GECTECHNI CAL ENG CORP
OUTSIDE ENG Nc�
I �ERING
fl1051?
T9. 15
GLACST "�' = M ART ENE LUMEER MART
VIAI;iTENAN, C^ M �-�
A T_K� A L
DiD X13
E26#92
GGGCYEA� r �-
S�RVjC� STORE
?LP. } MAINT C
.9 VC HIC
AN 0 SU PP LI _ `rS V CL
O1D 614
87.46
GaO Yc " AR � �
S� +�V�CE STO
-
S UFPi� lES VEHICL
7 VE H i CLE
D1C E1 E
814. 00
pUANE GRACE
FEES SERV'
10E
01 u E l E
11.40
GP UBEFcS HARDWARE HANK
B ld g .
g• Inspector
� ,
MAI NTENANCE MA TERIAL
_
AN 0- SU PPLI ES t EGUI PM
ski C E1 7
26 • 46
HALLING 9ROS
SU FPLI ES, DUI PME IN T
73.95
HANDY _ . .
�` QY HITCH f- WELDING Co
SU PPLI '
_St VEHICLE
01G bi9
31.20
THE. HARTF INS CC
SU °LIES PR� oGRA M
01w E2J
295000
HAYt3Eti- MURPHY EQUIP CC
SUPPLIES, EGUIPMc.NT
DIC621
13.00
HEW LETT P ACKAR C
SU PPLI ES 9 EflUIPME T
N
D iv 522
5 0. 14 u
WILLIAM R HO WARD AR0
TRAVEL * TRAINING
Li I T Ur MAfjLtwUQ ; A C C C U N T S P A Y A B L E
CHECK'f A M O U N T C L A I 4 A N T
010623
010 624
0 its E25
D20 E26
010627
010 6 2 8
0 10 E29
01 C 63 0
a 1C 631
010 E32
D10E33
0 10E34
01C E35
010 c36
010637
01C E38 .:
010 E39
0 10540
010E41
010642
01C E43
01 C E44
010 E45
5.00
55. 00
53.28
13E. 00
6.8. 50
161.20
6.40
131. 26
13,680. ?0
32.50
5,639. C0
57.13
110.70
33.95
65. 74
25.30
86.75
45.65
5 03.00
i1J . 63
HOWIES LOCK -f KEY S RVI
INTL BUS MACHINES CORP
INTL HARVESTER CO
U + J TROPHYS f SPORTS
JIM CHR IS T Y PCNTI AC
K-MART
KEINCELS SUPER MARKET
KNOX LUM3ER CCMPANY
KUNZ OIL CO
RICHAPC= J LANG
LEAGUE CF MINN CI TIES
LEES AUTO SUFFLY
LESLIE PA PER
M P H INCUS TRIES INC
MA i4 O C PHOTO
MAPLE — W000 � FOOLS
MAPLEwCOG FOOCS
MAr LEWOCO PL9G + HTG INC
NE ILA AN O AS SCCi A TES
ME RIT CHE C
6 E , 404.90 "ETRC WASTE jC CNTRCL COM4
32950 DANIEL METTi.ER
744.70 MI DWAY TRACTOR
OAT E 38-06 -81 WAGE
P U R F 0 S
C SU Pry LI ES, EGUI P MEN
SUPOLSES, OFF:CE
U FP Li ES, VEHICLE
SUPPLIES, PPOGRAM
SU PPLI ES, VEHI GLE
SU PP LI c S, PP,uGr2A M
SU PPLI =S, PPOGRA M
MAINTE MATERZ A
FUEL + CI L
SUPPLIES, PROGRAM
SU 8 S CR IP T I C NS #- M EM 3 E
SU FPLI ES, VEHICLE
SUF0LI ES, OFFICE
REQ. MAI,11T •, EOU I
FrFc , SERVICi.
film processing
SUFPLI ES t PROGRAM
SU FP LI S , PROGRAM
REP. + SAINT., -LOG
FEES, CONSULTING
REP* + PAI,NT., VEHI#
AN - SUPPLIES, VEHI C3
SEWAGE. TREATMENT
SU PP LI ES , PROGRAM
SUFPLI ES, EGUIPMENT
CIT 'Y OF
MAPLEWOOD
A C C C U N T S P A T A 8 L E
DATE 08-06-081 PAGE
A
CHECK*
A M C U N T
C L A I M A N T
P U R. P O S E
O ii 646
70.
MN REC } PARKS ASSOC
SUESCRIPTIONS}MEMBEI
0IO E47
95.70
MINNESGTA TORC
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
010648
345.10
STAVE OF MN
OUTSIDE ENGINE ErkING
ANC -PEP. * NAINT., s
010649
263.00
WINFIELC A MITCHELL
LEGAL f FISCAL
810650
iC. 0
MUNIC. FINANCE OFFICERS
SOCKS + PERIODICALS
01C 1:51
12O. Ou
NAIL SEC + PARKS ASSOC
SUgSCPIPTICNS #-MEM3E.
C iC E52
319 C 0
NOR%0 STROM RIS MGMT INC
INSURANCE } BGNJS
010 E5 3
24. 07
NORTH ST PAUL WELDING IN
SUPPLIES, VtHi CLE
O 1C E54
735.97
;� THE P. STATES PvWE.R G0
UTILITIES
O 1C E55
297
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
UT IL ITIES
010656
616.51
NORTHERN STATES P-EWER CO
UTILITI =S
31C E57
113.92
NOS,THWESTERN EELL ;EL C
Ta LEPNCNE
01 C E5 8
440.97
N0K�T H :ST ERN EtLL ' =L CO
T L= PN CNE
010659
701.15
!NORTHWESTERN EELS TEL CO
TELEFHCNE
01C c60
105.72
OFFICE EA.ECTRChICS INC
SUPPLIES, OFFICE
010661
a* 00
0"XYGEN S =RVICE CO NC
SUPC'LIE'S, VEHICLr_
010662
556.63
PA r".EFRIGERATAIGti INC
R- 9 # IvAINT,, BLU.G
OIL 663
11.27
DAVID J DILLA TZKE
TF, AV EL } AZ;4+,NG
OIC664
99.95
RA - IC SHACK
MAINTEhANC= MATERi AI
fl1C 665
6. Q
iiAMCC PU3LISHING '
SUPPLI ES, PRO G+RA4
01 C E66
212. 75
RA MSEY Q I N I C ASSCC P A
FE ES , S ViME
Examinations
0 1 4 c67
8,46
RA MS;X CO OIRECTGR
FEES, S =RVICE
Delinquent Taxes
OICE60
E7.25
RAmSEY COUNTY TREASURER
FEES SERVICE
Data Processing
CITY OF
MaaL Ew00o
a C C u U .y T S P A Y A g L E
GATE 0 3-1'36-.81 PAG`
CHECK*
A M C U N T
C L A l4 A N T
010E6S
`
192.82
RA MSEY J
C LINTY TRc �.ASURER
OUTSIDE ENGINEERING
fl 10670
39093
RAMS;rY
_ COUNTY TREASURER
FEES, -- SERVICE
01:, 671
1 01 18
RA MS_Y COUNTY TREASURER
Data Processing
FEES S ERVI CE
�
010 E72
7 0.00
_
=
RA MS._Y COUNTY TREASURER
Film Processing -c
F� �=
�rs, �-RV
fl i0 E73
130025
RAMSEY SOIL + WATER
July 4th activities
FEES, SL V F
R I C _Water I
010 E74
175 . 0 0 8
r _
SAL E E RA Z5 KA ZCFF
Map reproduction
TRAVEL + TRAINING
010675
40.95
REED TIR_ SA I �� I Ep•
�' MAINT., 1
010 676
219000
RI CE STREET CAR WA 5H
REP# + NAI NT , VE (
I
J i0 677
?56.45
BOAC R� SCU-
t INC
REP. + �AI��T., VE
01067 E
1i9. 10
RUGGED RENTAL RUG S
t
" F� ES 9 SERVICE
�i1t 679
V.)
P
Rug
Rug Cleaning
,RYAN
e ..
TM AVER. + TRAINING
C1C 6
573.03
S + T OFFICE � �
P COU,�T�
-- . ,.
�UP�LI `� �, OFF1 CE
ANC - EQUIPMENT, CFFI�
AN 0- cU FPL1 tS s ; pp
GIC 681
459, +8
S + T OFFICE TRODUCT S
--
SU F�'LI �S, pFF,� CE
OIC E82
2 4.99ICMA?C
W SCHA E-
lL .�
CAN I FOR MS CL4 T KL G
0 12 Egg
4, 240.69
T a SCNIr SKY + S .S
C3t� INC
� - -�,
`�AINT�hANC_ MATERIAL
010684
17, 887.82
SCNOELL + MAO SCN - NC
OU T SID E GENGINEERING
010685
X
jCIENCE 4USEUM F MINN
C
�
0CCKS + PP-kI00ICALS
81C 68b
:• 142. 71
SELECT ScR1l.TCt SUPPL
U L Y
�-
�U PFLIES, PROGRAM
v10687
?,E19• 3
J i SH.1EL Y CO
1 � .�
MAINTENANCE MATERi A;.,
01C E88
785. ?4
CITY CF ST PAUL
R_ P MA� NT•, EOU I cwt
REP T
ANO-R Ps } ?!AiNT., Ro
010689
6.40
ST PAUL )I PA TCN
SU 3SCR IPTI ONS+ M'M3 ER c
M' mg
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A B L E
DATE 08 -06 81 PAGE
CHECK*
A M O U N T
C L A I M A N T
P u R P 0 S E
g OIC690
230.00
ST PAUL } SUBURBAN BUS
FEES, SERVICE
Gals Get -a -way
410 E91
25.03
GREG0R Y -- L - S T A FNE __. __.------- ._....__
TR AV E1.. + TRAINING
010692
108. C5
STS SPRING + ALIGNM - NT
RCP. + NAIN.T., VE'N IC
-.
AN - P N C
C SUP LI £S • V E I .
0 iC 693
3
SYLV AX CORP
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
OiC694
76.50
TABULATI4G SERA BUREAU
FEES, SERVICE
Data Processing
010 E95
90.36
TAKGET STOR INC - -
SUFPLI ES, PROGRAM
106j96
18.46
H P, TOLL CO
MAINTENANCE MA T£R+ AL
010697
354.96
TRUCK UTILITIES # MFG CO
REP. + MAINT., VEH IC
-
AN - MA I NTENANO E MATE
_
A� �- SUPP -'ES, VEHICL
Oi E98
24.65
TWIN CITE' FILTER St- IN
FEES, SER�IICE
Filters
010E99
158.00
TWIN CITY TESTING
OUTSIDE ENGINEERING
t11 G 7ti 0
771. 59
UNI F CRMS UNLI MITED _
Uri I FC? MS CLO T hiN G
AN 0-mSU PPLI ES
OiJTJi
133,20
KING IN DUSTRIAL CENTER
VI D
REP. + 0AINT., EOUIF
010702
527s 05
VIKTU= FRINTING CG - -. - _ _
SUPPLIES, OFFICE
010703
92.85
WAGERS
SUPPLIES OFFICE
010704
�� 153 70
WARNcRs tRu vALUE � w E
su��LIE E CU PM NT
ANC - MAINTENANCE ,CIA TE
-
- _ - -- -
ANB- GH`MIC - &LS t
ANC- SUFPL.IES, PROGRA
C i G 70 5
2, 9 +5, 0 0
WGOB BUEY ME CHANICAL
RE N T AL. , EGU1 ENT
f CITY OF
MAPLEWOOC
CHECKS
XEROX DCRPORATICN
A M C U N T
0
+ TEMP.
435.42
010707
XEF,CX CCRFORATION
319.28
01070.8
THE XEn.OX STORE
. u
010 709
JOSEPH A ZA PP A
i5. JO
010710
::
157, 50
01G711
CE�BIE DERG
126 J3
C10712
STEPHEN 3ERGK
45.00
010713
:.
99.97
0 10 714
.,
42E•t6
010 715
THERESA , F L A HE Y
208.25
01071 E
kic
14 8. 9 7
01%717
CH�-.IS GA;l3RAITH
E7•85
010713
:.
85.00
010 719
MATTH W ;TANG
22 91. 7�
710720
Mi CHAEL N CSCH KA
33. CO
C 10 721
GREGCRY M ICHAEL JACKSON
263.54
A C C O U N T S P A Y A 3 L GAS
� £ OS — 0r g 1 PAGE
C L A I 4 A N T
P U R P 0G
S £
XEROX DCRPORATICN
SUPPLIES,
- - -.
OFFICE
+ TEMP.
AMC - DUPLICATING
COST
XEF,CX CCRFORATION
OUP T
FICA IhG
COSTS
THE XEn.OX STORE
SI.fPPI.I tS,
p FFIC�
JOSEPH A ZA PP A
UN I FOP MS +
C LOTHING
YNN A ASV JEr�S C1�
WAGES, P/
♦ T EM¢
CE�BIE DERG
WAGES, P/T
} TEM
£ P.
STEPHEN 3ERGK
WAGESp P/T
+ TEMa
ELI Z A8ETH CA SS£flA Y
WA G P/
� T
* --
; E Mr,
MA-.Y CASSEOAY
WAGES P/T
f TEMP
THERESA , F L A HE Y
WAGES, P/T
+ AMP
T� .
ilARY FOWL ER
WAG' i=/ T
} T mP
CH�-.IS GA;l3RAITH
WAGES, P/T
+ T E MP
PAUL HAAG
WAGES, P/T
+ TEMP
MATTH W ;TANG
WAGES, P/T
TEMr.
Mi CHAEL N CSCH KA
WAGES, P/T
+ TEMP
i
GREGCRY M ICHAEL JACKSON
T A
R VEL TFCAINI
NG
0 722 :: 21. KA,YN Kas RzAK
010723 �7J.O�i KRISTINE KULZER
O iC 724 212. 13 THuMAS S MCKA Y
J1C 725 223. 87 JULIE MCCCLLUM
010 72 E 31.87 A NN L CU I� E MILLER
AND - WAGES, P/T TEMP
WAG'
P/T
+ TEMP.
WAGES,
P/T
+ TEMP.
TRAVEL
f 'KAINING
ANC — WA GES s
P/T + T E M P
WA GF S,
P/T
+ T EiltP.
WAGES,
P/T
} TEMP.
CHECK* A M C U N T
010 72 7
,�
51.6 2
010 728
E
205.43
01,0729
n
238.50
010730
'
196.50
010731
''
175000
010 732
WAGES,
22 7.50
01 C 733
"
3 01.0 0
010734.
P/ T
341.75
01C735
ERIC ODE.4 _
295.75
01073£
+
45003
010 73 7
WAGES,
291.87
010738
"
15.10
010739
'^
282.87
010 740
DEBRA 0 NEIL.
94.83
010741
'h
63, 47
0 it 742
i►
2080
010743
''
432929
0 10744
"
53.10
810745
::
241,=3
OiC746
"
46.87
013747
'`
48,67
010 748
"
455 it
C L A I M A N T
P U R
P O
S
E
MARY MITCHELL
WAGES-9
P/T
+
TEMP•
JULI NCT 7 _ _ __
_ _ __ _- _ _ WA GE Sr
P/T
+
TEMP,
CHP.ISTOPHER OCEN
WAGES,
P/T
+
TEMP.
DAVID BRI AN 0 CEN
WA GES,
P/ T
+
TEMP.
ERIC ODE.4 _
- - - WAGES,.
P/T
+
TEMP.
MARKEL ODEN
WAGES,
P/T
+
TEMP.
MICHAEL OOEN
WAGES,
P/T
+
TEMP.
DEBRA 0 NEIL.
- -- - -- WA GES,
P/T
+
TEMP..
PAUL PET =RSON
WAGES,
P/T
+
TEMP.
CHARLES PLANTE
WAGES,
P/T
+
TEMP*
MICHAEL RADA
WAGES,
P /T
+
TE4P.
AiEERT RASCHKE
TRAVEL
+ TRAINING
JEFFE.RY RASCHKE
WAGES,
P/T
+
TEMP.
CENISE RYDEW
- WA GES,-
-P /T
+
TEMP.
TER' ESA M SALECK
WAGES,
A&I A Tyr
P/T
A ti —a
}
TEND.
!'A A T&I T�
PAULA M SCHNEEWEIS
BRIAN SH`RBURNE
VA SP AN,4 8A UE R
MARTIN SP ANN3 ALER
RICHARD; STARK
KE LLY ANN STRCM
C GARY TEWINKEL
WAGE
P/T
+
TEMP.
WAGES,
P/T
*
T E.MP.
__- ---WAGES*
P/ T
+
TEMP.
WA G£ S,
P/T
+
T E- M P.
WAG =S,
P/T
}
TEMP•
WAGES
P/T
+
TEH.P.
WAGES,
P/T
+_
T EMD.
- -- _ ANIl TP.AVEL
f
TRAIN IN
CIT OF MAPLEi OOC
A C C 0 U N �
T S A Y A g ,L E
OATS
06 PAG
1 �
C HECK*
A ht C U N T
C L A M A N T
P U R F 0 S E
a 10 749 �
2 88.52
THOMAS TH ELF.
WAGES • P/T + T M p.
_.
AND - TRAVEL + T 1 A IN ,
01075
5 ,?. CO
JON THOMAS WALLACE
_
r
WAG.. S, PIT * TEMP.
01C751 ,�-
- - -- - 373.98
- RI CHARD AL s.EN W _ --
-- TRAVE t
L TRAIN.LNG
ANO- WAGES, P/T '+ T;
010752
64 8. 47
M -
aURICr. WEIN$LATT
WAGEc P/T i TEMP,
010753 .:
_
224.80
SAWN MARIE W � �
I L�ENAU�R
WAGES P/T T FMP.
010754 •:.
3. C. 0
A V H g U �
K_
R E F U N 0
01 C 755 ,�
3.0 0
JANET NISKA - - - - --
a
- --
E F U N 0
010756 ;,
3.75
MR` DE30 E
I BILOTTA
R E F
U N 0
01-757
LUCZLiE 8 -
H RY ANT
R E F U N D
010 758
1g. 00
MATHILCA ROOT-- --
T
R E
_
F U N D
010759
d.;
,E-
�S ;,. OL SON
R
E F U h O
010760
3.OG
GAVE GIEL
R E F U N D
010 761 ;;
15* 00
SHIRLEY SCHO -WV
010762
150
L04' J
Ii��E HOPKIt�S
R
F U N D
0 10763
30. 00
MA RILE E S80 OT
�'
R E F U N D
010 764 �•
16.03
RETTE ;
J Y -
A NL H AAK
R E F U N O
010765 ;c
15600
MRS DEt`iNT M C VANN
R E F U N 0
010 766
15.9ti
PAKO H ALLMARK
R
SUPPLIES OFFICE
0 iL 76T
5 0.00
MAYFAIfi, HOTEL-
TRAVEL } TRAINING
010768
T5. 00
_
ALBERT � O E
FT ,T LEA FIRE OEFT
TPAVEL + T A"
R �.NI hG
010 76 c
. 00
SANCRA SHEARER
R E F U N 3
010770
126 00
GUY SOM.ERS
R E F U N 0
• v v - ..
CHECK* A M C U N T C L A I 4 A N T
010771 21.50 JIM BERLIN
01:772 :_ .81900 ELAINE MORRIS
010773 8. C0 JUL.IE YCUNGREN
213 180- CHECKS WRITTEN
TOTAL CF 289 CIECKS TOTAL 375,x+71.52
Indicates items financed by recreation fees
P
U
R
0
S E
R
E
.F
U
N
0
R
E
F
U
N
0
R
E
F
U
N
0
CERTIFICATION
REGISTER
CHECK OA TE 07 —i1— 8 i
CHECK
NAME
GROSS PAY
NE' T FA Y
02151
EVANS
BARRY
R
i,620 *44
963.96
--- -1-2- - 52 -----
i ------ -- -
-- V-1 V AN ---
---
–br6 -8 -0-- -- - -_
-3- - -- - - -- - -- - - - -_ -_ ____
02153
FAUST
DANIEL
F
1, 289.78
819970
021,54
FRANK
P ATRICIA
L
317.25
2 65.78
NAGE -- -_____ _ --
_ .A.RL 1 N E-- -
'
–7-42.v4 '— ---3-54w-31+ - -- - -- -- - --
02156
MATHEYS
ALANA
K
575,11
X424.41
021
VIGCREN
DELORES
A
490.22
3 32.63
0 2- 1-S$ --
A-�1 Z-L r 15 -----
- I L 1,. -E-- -- -E-- --
---- - - - ---6`
- -8-7 =- - -- - - --
0 2159
GREEN
PHYLLIS
C
642.67
443.51
02160
SCHIOT
JEAINNE
L
203.52
165 *22
-- _ si
.-5- -
02162
VI ETOR
L ORRAI NE
S
502022
3 36.9 7
02163
PELO IN
ALFRED
J
666. Z2
96o35
y
RR
02165
ARNCLO
JAVIO
L
1, 019x11
331.61
02166
ATCHISON
JOHN
H
898.22
623.25
+-._-
-9rA..s - T - T
TM'
_ - --
02168
CAHANES
ANTHONY
G
1, 022.67
468.16
4
02169
CL AUSON
DALE
K
8 98* 22
75.22
02170 - Q U.L
02171
OELMONT
D NNI S
J
1
48990
02172
OREGER
RICHARB
C
i 046.95
588988
2 1 _ — ..__
_ � A Y �! Q N 0.- _
__ —E
2 —
_A -3$. &A l
02174
FL AUGHER
J AYME
L
626.17
399,
02175
FULLER
JAMES
0
490.22
362.51
ko l l T Ur MAPL WUCU
C HECK
- #;
02176 GREEN
�
' 02118 HALWEG
b
PAYROL REPORT WAGE 2
CERTIFICATION REG iSTER CHECK GATE 07.37 - 8i
NAME GROSS PAY NET PAY
NCRMAN L 1,040.45 541.33
+� --= 7 T om - 7 w C
KEVIN R 898.22 386.75
r
; 02179 HEINZ STEPHEN J 599. it 395 a b2
j
A 71 n tt u n }� 2 S ir-
0 2181 JA GUITH DANIEL R 55 6. JO 37 2.O 2
1
1 -
02182 KORTUS 00NaLD v .886.16 5 82,8 2
X8.3 -- --- -A- - - -- g_ _-- -
q �3 nn
i
02184 MCNULTY JOHN 168.21
;
-� 02185
MEEHA N g JR
TAMES
E
883.34
453.55
, ,
n 2 a
, '�- --E -
-
919-11
02187
MOESCHTER
RICHARD
M
898.22
69.66
02188
MCf ELLI
RAYMOND
J
881.34
5 92.20
- ''
a(
l 71 D
Mill W F F
_ _. � G -�' ---- W
6 G n_ 7 3
348 7
02190
NELSON
KAREN
A
55 .22
329 . 5 4
x ,
=
02191
NELSON
ROBERT
0
1
666.27
n2l .2
n A T W
--.��- -
7_ 0 1
-4I
-- f-
_
02193
PELTIER
WILLIAM
F
1 001.7$
•
546 .86
02194
RICHARDS
ANNE
M
168.75
145.06
11 21 Q G
a
-�
w
_ 7
A 34--4 -4
'
02196
SKALMAN
DONALD
W
898.22
9 1.18 .
02197
STAFN`
GREGORY
L
898.22
555.98
i
y R N� - i�l- --
0219.9
STOCKTON
OARRELL
T
881.34
5 80.23
02200
SVENBSEN
JOANNE
M
586.22
375.13
.
3
CERTIFICATION REGISTER CHECK DATE, .07 -17 - 8i
CHECK
NAME
GROSS PAY
NET PAY
0 2201 E M I C HELE y
,. TUC HN�R C ELE A 55 0.22 2 5 7.45
-0- 2:202 - T I jj m n n �, c :I _ Q A 13 2
02203 ZAFPA JOSEPH A 1 1 *342.00 655.69
02204 8ECKER RONAL D 944.89 198.48
n 72 rs
up%. WW
++I�crr�r
- ��
c
- ;-- - --0 2 l - E-Mf - T.2
��.�. Q a
02296
GRAF
DAVID
944989
438.0 6
02207
LEE
ROGER
w
962.22
5 36.9 2
i n �0
2l..�.� R ---. --
,1-0 N
A
--. &9
2- 0 - 1 6 1
02239
NELSON
C AROL
M
902.22
550.18
:j
= 02210
t
RQ ZSKA ZOFF
D ALE
E
944.89
149, 25
-� ---1 2 ----
�-I-� �.E
r_ Q n
%
4 4 v 2 A& c _ A
02212
a'
1
RYAN
MICHAEL
P
944, 89
448.81
' 02213
VORWERK
R06ERT
E
944.89
196.44
i
y 0 10 a GR E�.N
M,E --_
-
G
_ 1 4
S; 7-3.6 A
a
J
3 0 2215
J
EMEERTSON
JAMES
M
813078
535096
02216 SCHADT ALFRED C 1, 005.33 604.06
i
i
'l
02218 OCR ERT Y KATHL E'EN M 215.20 169s58
02219 SARTA MARIE L 189000 147.56
22 2 0 E L T AS___ JAMES_
02221 GANZEL PETE R
J
G__ a 7 se . 1i 4 87--.. 5 i --
R 476* 00 3 91.56
� 02222 HAIDER
KENNETH G
1, 185.33
459.45
- ;-- - --0 2 l - E-Mf - T.2
A kX - - -- . A
-_ 52 . x.11
____3 3 I 5.31
02224 PECK
M
DE NNIS
875.11
4779$6
02225 WILLIAMSCN
ROBERT F
770.22
475.35
Y�
i_ tea__ • �.��. �_- r_ -..�r�
CERTIFICATION REGISTER CHECK GATE 07- 17w , 81
CHECK NAME GROSS PAY I NET PAY
02232 CASS
WILLI - C 1,031.55 486.87
L &I - -T - - -- -
02234 HELEY RONALD J 763.20 481.70
-'
02226
DRUAR
MICHAEL
J
347950
287.48
L
._j
_
3
02237 KLAUSING
HEM NnY F
780.02
_ -
r 5•S .-
- ".L TE R ---
02238 MEYER
4-9-4 3-- - - -
3AERNAR0
360.00
323.59
02226
h�
GESSELE
JAMES
T
764.44
491.68
M I
02229
PILLATZKE
OA'VID
J
1, 031.56
670.95
w � n - ----- �I�A -N-
--- J A -My-E-S
- ---
5� !
- 4- 4.6- .-x n- --
02245
3RENNE -R
LOIS
J
586.22
19E.24
02231
9REHEI M
ROGER
W
665960
411.81
02232 CASS
WILLI - C 1,031.55 486.87
L &I - -T - - -- -
02234 HELEY RONALD J 763.20 481.70
-'
02235 HOCh3AN
JOSEPH H
665.60
.. J
/
_1
1 � A , `w
i
481.70
7
•
._j
_
3
02237 KLAUSING
HEM NnY F
780.02
02238 MEYER
GERALD W
767.84
444
-- 3 -49- �3 -- - -- - --
339.99
383.39
I- ��- -- -GS* E -I�4- - -- --3 2 Q --�+ 5
c1;
-4
1
?f 02240 PRETTN JOSEPH 6 72.80
-
02241
R%EINERT
EOWARO
A
763920
481.70
41
J'
02243
ZEI MET , J
3AERNAR0
360.00
323.59
02150
LAROCHE
GI�L8E.RT
C
564.89
373.24
r
=' •
J;
-0 22^ 4 4 ----- 5- --- -
A t1 -Z '' ---
---- -
--- Z - - 5- +4�- 9- . -1-1 -- -- - - -
1
02245
3RENNE -R
LOIS
J
586.22
19E.24
21
c .
02246
KRU?MEL
BARBARA
A
255610
138.91
.n- 0 .E_6 R
1 21 6 :- 8-9- -- 7 -5. 5--- -- -.
'1
02248
TAUBMAN
DOUGLAS
J
654.67
4 11.5 3
J
u
1
02249
WARD
ROY
G
292. a9
2 25.48
•
1
3
i-1
5t
1
,j
CITY OF MAPLEWCOO PAYROLL REPORT
CEK`T IFICA TION REGISTER
PAGE 5
CHECK DATE 07.17- 81
CHECK NAME. GROSS PAY
02250 3URKE
NET PAY
MYLES R 763, 20 396.46
n 7 7 61 w r - --D -A V- - - - -- r -- - 4 7 1 - L _ w %ff -- -- 1w
02252 GU SIND A McL V I N J 190 5 7 0.9 8
02253 H EL EY
ROLAND 0 763, 20 489.34
-- -�4+-4S G 4- G A-R V - -- -- _2 � 0 %o an
w _ -- -..2 1- a-
022 MARUSKA 14ARK A 700.80 441.26
0 22 56 MOSSONG RICHARD H 128.00 128.0 0
k4€ t - 2 -35- *A 2
02258 ROSS
THOMAS
28800 288900
_ 1
02259 SANDBERG TIMOTHY J 256.0 Q 2 56 *0 0
------ S.".T- A -- -- _ _E___- - T A T .
0 22 61 KEMPENICH
02262
S P ANNBAUER
MICHAEL C 370.08 303.68
KATHLEEN G 2 63.81 2 26.41
0 22 _____. 9.RJU-N£ 1. -L-- -- d Q B A R A . - ,k l 88 . -
i
1
02264 GREW
JANET M 592978 383.99
02265 HOPSNE LL JUDI A 284900 213.25
_ U 726�.�.5
02267
SOUTTER
CHRISTINE
590991
403.9 3
^'
022 ES
CHLE9ECK
JUDY
616.00
228.13
x..2.2 6 9 E K S 'T R.A -ice
- _
T 0 7 6 2 6
02270
JCHNSON
RANCALL
L
734954
474. i 4
_
0 271
OLSCN
GtOfPREY
W
1,195. it
663.62
_a
I.2.2. �2.
kE_f ' -
________ ,� SIT _�i_____________
_ 22 �
i Z. i - -
02273
OSTROM
4ARJORIE
1, 010 67
620.95
02274
WEN C£R
RC) SERT
J"
711.11
461.5 2
i
J
U T fi M u r L t WU r N TrKJL K tto U n,
CERTIFICATI REGISTER
CHECK NAME GROSS PAY
PAG E
CHEKCK CAFE 07 -17- 81
NET PAY
CHECK REGISTER TOTALS 97 415.53 529 934.34
02284 Thomas M l* chae 1 S 378,00
313,00
CHECK REGISTER TOTALS 97 ,793.53 53 ; 247. 34
i
a
t
• 3�
t
'
'02275
EGSON
3AVI3
a
821.34
512.48
�i
1
,
0 22 TT
NACEAU
E0WAR0
A
8 81. fib
5 74.21
22 78
NUTESON
LA VER NE
s
i 0 44.97
4 31.43
02260
flUI NN
BRADLEY
1
320.
257.75
02281
VOVES
THOMAS
1
320.00
258928
a rt ?ff
y -
m low
--
i
0 2283
MULVANEY
OENNIS
M
813. b0
4 97.8 3
CHECK REGISTER TOTALS 97 415.53 529 934.34
02284 Thomas M l* chae 1 S 378,00
313,00
CHECK REGISTER TOTALS 97 ,793.53 53 ; 247. 34
i
a
t
• 3�
t
a
CITY OF MAPLEWOCD
PAYROLL REPORT
CERTIFICATION REGISTER
PAGE 1
C AECK DATE 07.31 -8i
CHECK
lit 629. 44
NAME
GROSS PAY
NET PAY
0 2286
02287
ANOERSON
BASTIAN
NOR MAN G
GARY W
275.00
275900
238o35
256971
02288
GREAVU
JOHN C
350, 00
250.71
32269
022
JOKER
NEL SON
FRANCES L
EAR L L
275. 00
275. 00
226.74
256.71
02291
EVANS
BARRY
R
lit 629. 44
938.71
0 2292
02293
LE W IS
FAU.ET
VIV AN
DANIEL
R
F
660o 00
It 289. 73
4 38.53
841 0 6
0 22 94
FR A NK
PATRICIA
L
3609 00
2 9 6.45
02295
02296
HA.GEN
MAT HtYS
ARLINE
ALA NA
J
K
79 . 45
5759 11
5 2 8.61
? 0 .85
32297
VIGCREN
DEL ORES
A
490. 22
339.07
02298
02299
AUR ELIUS
GREEN
LUC ILLS
PHYLLIS
E
C
I 204o 00
642967
7 54 •
443951
0 2300
SCHADT
JEANNE
L
254* 40
205.33
0 2301
0 2302
SEL VOG
VI ETOR
BETTY
LORRA INE
0
S
616.00
502. 22
3 95 .91
341.51
02303
PELCQUIN
ALFRED
J
666922
436930
v
0 2 3 05
HEN SLEY
h
P A T R I C I A
A
, ou
210. 00
124 . 70
15 2.00
0 2 306
ARN GLD
OAV ID
L
1 019. ii
6 76.72
02307
022308
ATCHISON
SASTYR
JOHN
OE30RAH
H
A
930923
456939
6 L1.86
312.93
02309
CAHANES
ANTHONY
G
19 022.67
677928
02310
CLALSON
DALE
K
925. 16
63 .08
CITY OF MAPLEWOCD FAYROLL REPORT r-
PaG_ 2
CERTIFICATION RFGISTER CFECK DATE' 0 ? -31- ,
b b 1
CHECK NAME GROSS PAY N ET PAY
fl 12,51
COLLINS
KENNETH
V
i, 023, li
5166. 02
02312
DEL MONT
DENNIS
J
1 , 918 7.56
775 9 6"'
0 2328
02313
ORE CER
RICHARD
C
I 080* 36
7 20 .85
02314
FERNOW
RAYMOND
t
898.22
�'
635.7,
02315
FL A UGHER
JAY ME
L
586e22
3 3 0 .63
0 2316
FULLER
JAMES
0
515.66
33 6. iw
0 2317
GREEN
NORMAN
L
I 0409 45
736. 81
0 2 318
HA G EN
THO MAS
L
I 26 9. 78
6 39 .5b
I 020* 38
7 0 2
02333
OMA TH
JOY
E
0 2319'
HALWEG
KEVIN
R
8 9 $ . 22
601 33
02320
HEINZ
STEPHEN
J
599. 11
3 90. bZ
02321
HER EERT
MICHAEL
J
898. 2?_
789.01
0 2322
JAQUITH
OANIEL
R
556.00
37 3.0-+
02323
KORTUS
JONALC
v
652, 96
451 84
02324
LANG
RICHARD
J
935 00
633. 56
02325
MCNULTY
JOHN
J
1, 0400 00
697
Ue s ,eb
M E E HA N, JR
JA's!ES
E
-- 881.33
5 53.09
02327
METTLER
0A N,
6
9190 li
634 53 t
0 2328
MOESCHTER
RICHARD
M
898.22
535.74
42329
MORELLI
RAYMOND
J
881.33
0 2330
MUL ' EE
GEORGE
W
55 0. 22
L
370.39
02331
NEL eON
KAREN
A
571.66
3 E0 970
- 0 2 332
NELSON
R03 ERT
D
I 020* 38
7 0 2
02333
OMA TH
JOY
E
496o
3 36 , 00
02334
PELTIER
WILLIA
F
1,001.78
bf1.83
02335
RIC HA FOS
ANNE
M
18 70 50
i� 5 9. � 5 9 —
UITY OF MAPLEwOCD
A
P YRCLL
_
REPORT
, .�.. -....
PAGE 3
- --
Chi cCk
CERTIFICATION
NAME
RCGISTcR
GROSS PAY
�.
CHICK OAT` 07..31_
NE T PAY
92336
S CH AL LER
PIC HAR D
i
�
1,374.67
3E3 .7g
0 2337
SKALMAN
OONALO
898. 22
b 3 1.33
0 2 338
ST A FNE
GRE GORY
898* 22
601 . 33
023319
STILL
VERNON NON
T
881. 33
603.53 -
____ D 2340
STOCKTON
OAR FILL
T
893o 49
5 3r3. 93
02341
SVE NDEVEN
JOANNE
M
5 8 5. 2
330 96 3
02342
T U C F N E. R
-4 10 H �'
EL �
,A
578. 79
37 6 o
02343
WI L LIA` 'z
Oua NE
J
932. 4 4
7F0,»
fl 2 344
ZA P FA
JOSEPH
A
1 042. OQ
6 3b . 50
fl2345
8, KrR
L
O
94 8�3
0 38 4
� y
- 02346
CUSICK
OFNNIS
- - S
1 ig7.5b
775. A�
D 2347
GRAF
DAV I0
M
944o89
556. of
fl23y8
LEE
ROGL
077. Q7
r C
� .0 .52
- 0 2 349
M L Atj t?c:R
JON
A
944. 39
513.02
D235D
_
NELSON
CAROL
M
902, 22
633,03
0 231
R sKAZO FF
OA E
L -
..
944.89
5? 9.37
- -- 0 2352
RICHI
CA ROL
r
44o•
306.23
0 2353
RYA N
+�1ICHAFL
P
944.39
6 3 8.44
__ YCJNGREN
JAMS
G
9 4 5. 26
_ � oo . 39
0 2356
EM8ERTSON
J�.�'',Cj
M
8139 78
554995
�0 2358
CUDc
LAR FY
J
7 •
146922
, y
111 0 39
02359
00HERTY
KAT HLEr.Iti
M
215. 20
1 b9.58
0 4360
80?
MAR I L
-3 to 0 6_
1
CITY OF MAPLEWOCO
FAYRCLL
CERTIFICATION
REPORT
REGISTER
PAGE 4
CHECK DATE 07- 3.1 - 81
CH ECK
NAME
GROSS PAY
NET PAY
D 23E1
0 2 3 E2
ELI
GA N ZEL
JAMES
PETER
G
R
875.11
514. 50
563.05
418.82
0230
HA I CER
KENNET H
G
i 185s 33
659 e �+5
923E4
0 23E5
NEMETZ
PECK
MARY
D ENNIS
A
L
523911
875. 11
3.35.31
579.65
023E6
THOMAS
MICHAEL
S
420000
339.26
0 23 E7
023E8
WI LLIAMS ON
DRUAR
ROBERT
'MICHAEL
F
J
770* 22
400.00
475 o 35
325.15
023E9
GEISSLER
WALTER
M
882.48
543.28
02370
02371
GESSELE
PI LLATZKE
.JAMES
3AV I D
T
J
779.32
it 031* 55
508 949
631.32
0 2372
LAYMAN
JAMES
N
651. f1
4 +8.30
02373
92374
9REHEIM
CASS
ROGER
WILLIAM
W
C
690056
19031* 56
450.08
625926
02375
- --
FRE EERG
RONALD
L
763, 20
439, 34
02376
02377
HELEY
HOC H9 AN
-RGNAL C
JOS E P h
J
H
863.37
75 2.96
5+2.10
516.21
0 2378
-
KANE
TC HAL
R
76 3.20
489.34
0 379
02380
KLAUSING
MEYER
HENRY
GERALC
F
W
841. 91
971.46
55 3.1d
610.8.'
02381
OSWALD
ERICK
D
400.00
325.15
02382
02383
PRETTNER
REINERT
JOSEPH
EOwARC
a
A
1 347. 13
763.20
876.49
489.34
02384
__
TE VLI NtJR
HARRY
J
1
659973
023815
ZEINET JR
9`RNAR0
360900
323.59
CITY CF MAPLEWOCD
FAYFCLL
REPORT
PAGE 5
771. 86
43 2. 0.3
C= PTIFICATION
REGISTER
CHICK CAT` 07. -81
CHECK
NAME
SCHAD
GROSS PAY
NET PAY
02386
LARCCHE
GIL9ERT
C
564.89
3 3l. T7
02387
ADA M S
PAULINE
M
942.23
552.72
02388
BRENNER
LOIS
J
640.44
421 .71
02389
K RUhMEL
3ARBARA
A
250. 40
1 A5 • y
02390
CD E GA RD
P09ERT
D
1, 216. 89
771973
5 7 7.7
6.
D 2408
NORENELL
JUDITH
A
02391
TAU EMAN
DOUGLAS
J
654.67
4 32.50
323-92
WA R''
L
ROY
G
2929 89
?_ 2 5.43
02303
AURELIUS
R0SS
E
256.00
211 . 85
.6 .13
0 239
DURKE
MYL ES
R
763. 20
+39934
2-395 G IN
AV
639 20
500 . y2
023
GUS IN CA
MEL V I
J
I 007* 20
5 • 4
02397
HEL EY
ROL ANC
a
766.10
490 . 38
_
02398
LEMCN
JEFFREY
S
97. 20
c7.2D
02399
MARLSKA
MA?K
A
707.37
+79.1
O2 400
O@HEHIR
KEVIN
J
288.00
235.12
02401
ROSS
THOMAS
288.00
288.00
02402
SANC3ERG
TIM CTHY
J
288. 00
238.00
02403
SANTA
REP O
E
771. 86
43 2. 0.3
4 04
SCHAD
AMY
0 4 05
KEM FE t I CH
MICHAEL
C
334e34
2' 8 .04
0 2406
SPANNeAUER
KATHLEEN
G
143. 30
133956
- c4 7
GR Em W
J A-N E T
M
5 7 7.7
6.
D 2408
NORENELL
JUDITH
A
284* 00
210 925
0 24 09
J CH NSON
OAN A
L
14 0. 0 0
1'+ 0 . 00
0 12' 410
SOUTTER
CHRIST I NE
577. 78
.6 .13
CITY CF MAPLEWOCO
FAYFOLL
CERTIFICATION
REPORT
REGISTER
PAGEm E
C1-ECK OAT= 07 - 31 - b i
CHECK
02411
02412
NAME
CHL EBECK
EKS TRAND
JUDY
THOMAS
M
G
GROSS PAY
616. 00
74 8.17
NET PAY
407. 38
4.30 .37
02413
JCHNSON
RANDALL
L
700044
455.67
024 14
02415
OLSCN
WEGV�ERTH
GEOFFRE
JUDITH
W
A
1,195.11
221. 20
.653.62
173.71
02416
OS T ROM
MAR JOR I E
i, 010.67
6 2 7.95
0 2417
132413
WENGER
EOSCN
ROBERT
DAVID
J
6
711. 11
857.79
469.16
5 39018
D 24i9
HEREER
TIM CTHY
J
400o 00
3 25,15
-
02420
02421
NADEAU
NUTESON
EDWARC
LAVER�E
A
S
8180 05
1, 158.28
5 t2. 65
6 6a 0 .57 _
92422
OWEN
GE? ALD
C
777.60
530 011
02423
0242
QUINN
VOVES
BRADLEY
THOMAS
J
J
3609 00
400o 00
236.45
314. 57
02425
MACCONAL D
JOHN
E
841.60
553965
02-426
CHECK
02285
MUL VANEY
RE GISTER TOTALS
Kemp enich
OEmNNIS
Michael
M
S
813.60
100
161.73
550 . 37
67,351.-6
149.13
CHECK
REGISTER TOTALS
101,02-3972
67 1 0 0. 78
i f
E— oze
July 30, 1981
STAFF REPORT
To: City Manager Barry Evans
From: Chief of Police R. W. Schaller
Subject: Budget Transfer Request
During 1980, Bodell's Spirit Shop made underage sales to several young
people. They were, upon conviction, afforded the opportunity to pay
$1,000 in l i e u of bond forfeiture and allowed a period of time to pay this
obligation. They have now paid the $1,000.
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize these monies be p laced in
Police Equipment, Capital Outlay Account 101 - 121 -4640 for the purchase of
police body armor.
r
RWS : s
cc Liquor File
City Clerk
Fi nance Director
Deputy Chief Hagen
Lieutenant Cusick
80- 002758)
80- 010081
80- 010291
C 4--!
�`s J"N I , -� —n
i Olt (
CI
t
MEMORANDUM
TO:
City Manager
FROM:
Director of Community Devel onment
SUBJECT:
Preliminary Pl at Time Extension
LOCATION:
South of Londi'n Lane
OWNER /APPLICANT:
Mary Anderson Construction Company
PROJECT:
Crestview Third Addition
DATE:
July 22, 1981
SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL
Request
�F 000 3
Action by Cc �nc�1
J_
Approval of a 90 -day time extension for the Crestview Third Addition preliminary
plat,
Proposed Land Use
A planned unit development to construct 86 single - dwelling .homes and 10 double-
dwellings (20 units).
BACKGROUND
Site Description
Existing Land Use: Undeveloped
Surrounding Land Uses
Northerly: Londin Lane and the Connemara Condominiums
Southerly: Mailand Road and single - dwelling homes
Easterly: Single - dwelling homes being constructed in the ' Crestview 1st Addition p 1 at
Westerly: Highview Townhouses
Pact Qrtinn
11 -1 -79: Council approved a preliminary plat and planned unit development ermi t
for the project, wi th the condition p
on that the first building permit must be issued
within one year or the PUD shal terminate, unless renevied b y y the Ci Council.
6- _5 -80: Council approved a 90 -day time extension for the Crestview Third Addition
preliminary plat, subject to the original conditions.
10- 16 -80: Council approved another 90 -day time extension, subject to the original
conditions, and also renewed the PUD.
1-22 -81 and 4- 16 -81: Council again approved 90 -day time extens tons for the p re-
l imi nary plat, subject to the original conditions.
-1-
DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS
Planning
1. Land Use Plan Designation: RL, Residential Lower Density and Rm , Residential
Medium Density
2. Zoning: F, Farm Residential
3. Section 1004.030 of the City Code states that: "Approval of a rel imi nar
plan shall 11 be null a p y
P and void unless within ninety (90) days after receiving
the last required approval of the Preliminary
q ppr. el m� nary plan, there shall be submitted
to the Clerk of the Village a final plat or plats in accordance with the
conditions upon which such approval was granted by the Council."
Recommendation
Approval- of a 90 -day time extension for the Crestview Third Addition rel i mi nar
plat, based on the findings that:
th p y
1 . Council has approved s i m i l a r time extensions in the as t for
p other plats.
2. There have been no changes in the area that would justify denial of a time
extension.
Enclosed
1. Location Map
2. Preliminary Plat
-2-
3 � == UPPER ArTON RD.
128NRZZW _
2 41 '
dop
LOWER r TON RD
cc
39 ='
LONDIN j
Z
.
id
V
40V �t
�1) WARY LANE
39 tom) o DAY t. AHE
68 (3) pO+r•a AVE
cr
p m - (4) O OnY CIRCLE
SAL • h t � ? i
_3 • -
CL �1 LAKE WOC'^
• t T ZAKwOGL. CRI -E
- T VIE W DR, E
tr
O
0 0 0
-- 2 1 H w 23
25 1
L OOD AVE
-j pe HL •�aVE - 72
VAN co'N'wir
v�
DAHL'.�78
oct,.� O
TZBN t
— t2' 7 � �
R22W 13 18 R21%% � Z
I . < _
flTl7'L1 ; le wr s T_ Cr El)
:c:
72
•• HIGHw000 AVE
o 49 4
AP
LOCATION MAP
1g7
F� c'f� iS5 �� o ��, bs � g _ L b I
wn, O,w L. A
lw
Powo F� •� � to 3 � S 6 . �
•�ti�f ,� 13 ° I IV
85 8� 9s 63 �
P R ESC0TT.
RD . Q
9
_ - - 8s at .
► !8 rod .
o o,- 19 c 2 0 r 21 0 22 Z3
or
♦ 17 -
fs •Q . �
• 16 '' bs $s at �s
t` �z 1ti ! D { ! it i
OD
9 15
15 ° 13 r
1 �� !�, 9 13 c o
10 c
1!
130 $� • �.. 1 i. '� t 3 C
135 q 5 b 1, 45f •qJ .5 13[► 1 1Z
13 w
�� �' •0 13o Q o o � �
r33 S,T A 10 �� da 1 t
g s 112 �t
9 f3 m Z8 I }
7 8 - ,. i 3 0 3 t,�?
�3s �• JQ 1 4 5 f r 2
f
13c 12�
!! -• 2
!� 13 o tto f23
V) 6 3 +
5 B
l ui a p m o o 0
r 31D
4 r
• ' `-.
E.
31
AVE* s� •�• . s X66
its t
00�
ID 1
as :
8 130 0 113 1
I Coco 9c p
s 90 ?o lts 8 - "►� S
•
N r,
60 43 3 - - - - - g _� a. L . j3
ML in - - - ISS
Js.
• i
t
of o
CL 1 SD 031D 1
• - �.. � � , V fir`. ��Y • � J
r
MEMORANDUM
T0:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT /OWNER:
PROJECT:
DATE:
EOOM �f
City Manager
Director of Community Development
Time Extension for Preliminary Plat
Lakewood Drive, Maryland Avenue, and Sterling Street
Arlington Properties -
Beaver Lake Hills Actia -
July 23, 1981 �� ~'--'L� -�
n do
,5
SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL ' ' Req
Extension a
Extension of the preliminary plat for an additional 90 days. (See enclosed
letter.)
Proposed Land Use
A quad development comprised of 46 buildings (184 two - bedroom units).
Past Actions
3- 20 -80: Council approved the preliminary plat, street vacati and a p 1 anned
unit development for Beaver Lake Hills, subject to conditions. One of the
conditions was that Council order the construction of a 12 acre -foot holding
and on the. property ��
p p p ty to the southwest, as shown on the Maplewood Drainage Plan. ""
6 -5 -80: Council approved a 90 -day time extension for the Beaver Lake Hills
preliminary plat, subject to the original conditions. , Council also p assed a
resolution ordering a feasibility study for the Beaver Lake Hills holding pond
and drainage system.
The feasibility study is in the process of being completed by the City's Engineer-
ing staff.
10- 16 -80, 1-22-81 and 4- 16 -81: Council approved 90 -day time extensions, subject
to the original conditions of the preliminary plat.
DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS
Planning
1. Land Use Plan Designation: Rm, Medium Density Residential
2. Zoni. ng: F, Farm Residential
3. Section 1004.030 of the City Code states that: "Approval of a preliminary plan
shall be null and void unless within ninety (90) days after receiving the last
required approval of the preliminary plat, there shall be sUbmi tted to the
Clerk of the Village a final pl a or plans in accordance with the conditions
upon which such approval was granted by the Council."
-1-
CONCLUSION
Analysis
Staff sees no reason to deny the applicant's request for another 90 -day time
extension. The City's Engineering Department is presently completing work on
the feasibility study for the holding pond, so the project i s' moving ahead.
Recommendation
Approval of a 90 -day time extension for the Beaver Lake Hills preliminary plat,
based on the findings that:
1. The City Engineering staff is still preparing a feasibility study for a
holding pond.
2. Council has approved time extensions in the past for other plats.
3. There are no changed conditions that would justify denial of the time
extension.
Enclosed:
1. Location map
2. Preliminary plat
-2-
:4
r
Li
K
I
2
Y
u
J
Q
O
Y
Q
O
J PE. iroiier c.ourT i
(Privote) 212
M.a F`Y! AND AV
a-S% IVE r ST
31= rvF
o G�6 )
stover 0 IA AV
CL
L o h e ° a
6 p 0
0 C 1. - S 0 -
=SASE 69 w 10- z FLARVE, STER
AV A VL
"k= 212 W LA. BRAND A F —
32 sT.
7TH �aYE. i E. T TH ALVE
cr-
ac v BUSH d `�
ti R22 25 30 R21w
. AVE. cr 36131
44 < t 70�
i4tN KAHA AVE.) f `/
34 34
E. MARGA AVE
F
E STM AvE
J
J W
< FREmo kT AV
•.3M ;r
LOCATION MAP
4
N
• •. .. mow....... . +... -... • ......... .. .. . .. ...
_ P
I
• . f•'� V '�. r. _ - • •.•� -te � _ � �tt�///���• •� �r�•�••rw� � N+ . •+w .►� - .••+�.� '�� / / � � f � � ►�
• • ♦ �.�_ • - Y .ter. wr• - - T M • , . �„w.. ... �.'� . T w . `.�__' . 1 •�".�.�.'.' •.•► - I4 • O PLA T
'wr
BE
LAf(E HILLS
� Y N•; � .� �_.�_ M � I f � � I t /. ' t 1v►' : I t � x it "� Tf"'�11 - � �-- -.- -� • ►. .
. � J �_,•— •;.. r� � � __ . ' f `' , �� ` ""` � �' .. _,� 1R111ifIM tll /Il�l1. IMF.
• 4 ��• . - `
44 Will M14111
03 tax.
PA .01
N r' F .
N
.� �� ,! A�EMYE Chi -.... hrw w.
i
• j \ • . •••� _1�1.= UCAl DESCRIPTION
rn 1. • I •w & ftm ►. •r • am" ••. 110• • •w 0 -
I , , ,' ' 1 " i ' • � . ♦ .1 . f A • , M a e rw • • %. "• 1. "A wr w wr �.rs •..•w�
�� t 1, • '; -� -_ ► , 1 11TE DATA
ILA 4111M
.....�.. I •w .fir.. �» w
•� �ti{ 2 .
' i i i .'��.. 6..0. � v:•i i�l •s
' %' ± ` 1 1 ' 1 7 1 .�► In l_. !1 t f , _ ►, w 04W ,........r •« III► Jw
va
tI.IC• _ M ^ I! 3 « 11 �' - . 1 , 1 .,�- 11 I fi �� ' �1) w •s•.. ,^ • t• w r vwlow •
•.• ,�.• `- _t._ _ ' .rte ..« • .�• GOA as upwa l
,✓
a'n► •y�y, • • •h��. J1� _ •
r
I I pk j i I E I A M I Y M ' ...... i.. .....,..� a u.r •,A......
cc
�, fi t: .� �- � f - � � � L � .,...�,� cur � rc :�• u• i, i i'�. �s la'illl�'` i� rw.r1A
i � .'� , � L �• �// ' � � % � � � 1! 'r-• � � 1 .•- Itl ' � = •c-- -- .�, �.r rwrw� � a�. ��us � ew wn tsM� � .
1 Ir 7-..
I
f 1 �:. 41.E •�� ,• ,' 1111 1.�,,' w.. N. AMMMP of .ww • •
/ 001' ucW
44. Ilm
mom= an In mwqmmmp� 4� vow am
• � It 1 / • I
t , u ��1 .w. • f I ......
• . wrs wt
j ._._ . / 1 � � � ' 1 � ; M ! 1,11 � ; I ' • ...w.. •.,r.w ....•...�..� ............ ,
1 .
1 1 srs + v ..r ur+wwm Ilan war
'• ' ' u' I .�� / I OCATION ,..w n.. ,... ��....._�....: '
r * 10110 son
6 4W pow wommm"
low
wo
�wk mamma— Y� ►'1 I j � f�' '' � � 't' 1 1/
— H -•
f ,
_,� ,�� ,��, '��. �•. •• _w �..������� _.. .! ego .. .Won QN.M '
• �. r `
WWWOW
z: ► �»
MEMORANDUM
E,0000 5 , 0
TO : City Manager
FROM: Director of Public Works '
DATE: 7- 30:-81
SUBJECT Signal Systems White Bear Avenue
at County Road B and at Cope Avenue
Ramsey County requests the City to approve
signal system plans for the intersections
of White Bear Avenue at County Road B
and White Bear Avenue at Cope Avenue.
The systems proposed are traffic actuated
and include left turn arrows for White Bear
Avenue. Each intersection is provided with
an "Opticom" system.
It is recommended that the City Council
approve the plans.
KJH /mb
D- e
ED
S.O P (N. S P POLE)
IV4 "R.S.C. RI "ER WITH
WEATHER HEAD
EXTEND INTO H.H.1
1 R.S.G.
3-1/c # 6 ---
( SEE NOTE 4 )
4" R. S.C.
4 - 12 /cOt 12
3- 3/c # 12
2 - 3/c # 20
ee 2/c 0- 14
2- I /c #10
I -25 PR. #19
r
0O
of I \\ D4 -1
4 R.S.C.
2
- _
4 /c *12 \�
I - 3/c # 20
4 -2 /c# 14 \�
2- Vc # 10
4 4
2 R.S.C.
'I 1 - 25 R ?* 19 �\\
_ 12
18 PR WALK B O THERS��
WHITE BEAR AVE. II
4•I
J ...
6 -3
2 -I
2-2
DI -2 DI -1
\ o
i �.� PROPO WALK B C+THERc - -
16
1 R.S.C.
2- 2/c -#14
r
^HEFT 10 3 "RSC
40' 2 -3
TWO WAY SIGNAL ( TYPE 2C)
2-SETS PEDESTRIAN INDICATIONS ( 12 )
I -PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON ( MTD. EAST SIDE)
ONE WAY EVP DETECTOR 8 INDICATOR LIGHT
MTD. ON EXTENDED SIGNAL BRACKETING
2 STEEL GUARD POSTS
EXTEND INTO H H 5
3 , R.S.C.
/ 2 -12 /c 1
! i -3 /c 12
I- 3/c #20
PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON STATION (4 "R.S.C.)
I -PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON
(MTD SOUTH SIDE)
EXTEND INTO H H. 5
2 -3 /c -# 12
3" R. S.0
2- 12/c #12
2- 3/c #12
I - 3/c -4 20 1 I/4" R.S.C.
4 2/c 2 - 2 /c X 14
2- I /c4- JO- -
- 25 PR. #19
PRA
=s � ` L -•a-
%\ I
' D5.2
D5•I 40'
U 6-2 1 8 F
- 1 DA- I _
_..._
DA H.H. -2
644 o _—
9 10 / 1
2 R.S C � 2 R.S C INP
- �, 2 -2 /c X14 � 2 -2 /c -`14
4
n45 \ I- 25 PR. # 19 REMOVE H 1
f
FORMATION 2-12/c #12 /
r - 3/c 4 12 ,�
4 -2 /c 14 j
3" R.S.0
2 - 3/c 12 — f 12
f THREE WAY SIGNAL (TYPE 3C)
2 - 3/ c # 14 2 -SETS PEDESTRIAN INDICATIONS
1 -PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON
( MTD. WEST SIDE)
2 -STEEL GUARD POSTS
PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON EXTEND INTO H.N. 15
STATION
3 (4" R. S C .) 2 -12 2 /c
2 /c � i2
1 -PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON I- 3/c �# 12
- ( MTD. NORTH SIDE)
AD PHASING
EXT EN D c 2 H.H. 15
NF'Ane% A -7 nnel $; -A o�n��T�+ n �i n icN c� TTn� �T l1Tti
3"R.S.0
2- 12/c #12
2 - Vc # 12 2" R. S. C
I- 3/c #20 2 -2/c#
2 -2 /c# 14 1 -25PR
2- I/c # 10
1- 25 PR. 019
\ -TYPE A- 35 -T40-8
LUMINAIRE - 200 WATT HIGH PRESSURE
SODIUM (APPROX . 350 °)
ONE WAY SIGNAL (OVERHEAD MTD. )
TWO WAY SIGNAL (TYPE 20C- POLE
MTD. 270c)
2 -SETS PEDESTRIAN INDICATIONS (12 ")
1 - PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON (MTD. 270
ONE WAY EVP DETECTOR 8 INDICATOR
LIGHT ( MTD. TOP MAST ARM)
SIGN DOWN LIGHT-OVERHEAD MTD.
I -STEEL GUARD POST
EXTEND INTO H.H.9
I - 2/c # 14
STI IAN PUSH BUTTON STATION W
DESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON
TD. EAST SIDE)
END INTO H H. 8
1 /4" R. S 512
.
- 3;tc —
E A -35 - 740 -10
INAIRE - 200 WATT HIGH PRESSURE
ODIUM (APPROX. 350 )
D4 -1
WAY SIGNAL (OVERHEAD MTD)
Z
WAY SIGNAL ( TYPE 20C - POLE
TD. 270° )
ETS PEDESTRIAN INDICATIONS ( "l
0
EDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON ( MTD. 270
V
WAY EVP DETECTOR AND INDICATOR
IGHT ( MTD. TOP MAST ARM)
DOWN LIGHT (OVERHEAD MTD)
TEEL GUARD POST
END INTO H.H 8
3" R.S.0
2 -12 /c 12
2-3/c #12
I -3 /cam 20
2- I/c # 10
\�
12 /c # 12
3/c # 12
3/c # 20
\
2/c * 14 ,
# \\
25 PR 19
- CONC. WALK- BY OTHERS
k AVE.
DI-2 --, 40' DI -I
I 3" RS C
2 -12/c * 12 .
- 3/c #- 1 2
2 - 3/c 20 .
4 - 2/c 14
1 -25 PR #19
TWO WAY SIGNAL ( TYPE 2C)
2-SETS PEDESTRIAN INDICATIONS ( 12 )
1-PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON
' ( MTD. EAST SIDE)
TWO WAY EVP DETECTOR AND INDICATOR
LIGHTS MTD. ON EXTENDED SIGNAL
BRACKETING
2-STEEL GUARD POSTS
EXTEND INTO H. H . IC)
3" R -SC.
85.- 2 -12 /c # 12
I- 3/c #12
1 - 3/c 20
D4 -4
T_ m4 4 _�_
6-3�
F �
4.4 ,
j
��m28�5
2.2
!I
�-
,
6
1 R. SC
3- 2/c #14
4 R S C)
S O.�P ( N.S.P. POLE) ----�
1 RS.C. RISER WITH
WEATHER HEAD
EXTEND INTO H.H.I
1 R.S.C.
3 /c #6
TWO WAY SIGNAL ( TYPE 2C)
2 -SETS PEDESTRIAN INDICATIONS (12 ")
1 -PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON (MTD. WEST SIDE)
PHOTOELECTRIC CELL ( DOWN LIGHTS)
MTD. TOP SIGNAL BRACKETS
2-STEEL GUARD POSTS
EXTf ND INTO H. H.2
3 ' R. S.C.
2 -12 /c 0- 12
- 2- 3/c #12
EQUIPMENT PAD (SEE DETAIL) =
7-STEEL GUARD POSTS
SERVICE CABINET
EXTEND INTO H.H. 1
1 R.S.C.
3 I/c # 6
EXTEND INTO H.H.5
I W R.S.C.
2 -1 /c # 10
CONTROLLER 8 CABINET (SEE NOTJE 3)
EXTEND INTO H.H. 2
4 R. S. C.
4 -12 /c Al2
- - . i/ . ^
I v'2
4.3
62
5 3
0 18�6
4.2
w
6 -i
D4 -2
'4
r3
TYPE A- 35
ONE WAY SIGNAL (OVERHEAD I
TWO WAY SIGNAL (TYPE 20C
MTD. 270 )
2 -SETS PEDESTRIAN INDICA"
�+ \ I - PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTO
\ SIGN DOWN LIGHT -OVERHEAT
ONE WAY EVP DETECTOR AND
LIGHT (MTD, TOP MAST A
i
I -STEEL GUARD POST
(30
c
?- 88
D4 -1
C
Z
0
V
89r
i
EXTEND INTO H.H.3
\ 3" R.S.0
\ 2 -12 /c *� 12
II 2 - 3/c # 12
-3 /cam 20
4' \
PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON STATIC)
r I- PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON
(MTD. WEST SIDE)
EXTEND INTO H.H.3
IV4" R.S.0
2-3/c #i2
i
I �4 RS.C.
1-2/c # 1 4
3" R.S.0
2 -12/c #12
2 - 3/c # 12
1 - 3/c #20
2 - 2/c # 14
PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON STATION (4 "R S.C.)
I - PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON
(MTD. SOUTH SIDE)
EXTEND INTO H.H. 10
1 %4"R.S.C.
2 -3/c # 12
2" R.S.C. 2 "R.r-
3 - 2/c # 14 2-2A
I- 3/c * 20 1-3/(
1 -25PR-W 19 �� 1-25
10 - -- I! - - - -- -- - _ WA _ '
t
5 MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Engineer
DATE: July 30, 1981
SUBJECT: SOUTHLAWN DRIVE
PROJECT NO. 79 -15
CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 1
E_6
A
Attached is information concerning additional work and
amendments to the construction contract proposed for the
above referenced project. The nature of the requested
changes are as follows:
1. Excavation for the street construction revealed
that the inplace utilities were backfilled with
materials inadequate to provide a stable street
subgrade. The materials were, therefore, subcut
to a depth of 4' below the planned subgrade and
then a granular borrow was hauled in and compacted
inplace. The estimated cost for the subgrade ex-
cavation and granular borrow will increase the
contract by $9,105.000
2. In conjunction with the unstable subgrade materials
a perched ground water table was discovered witlii.il
the roadway limits. The consistant seepage of
water into the street subgrade prohibited the con-
struction of a stable street section. The consulting
engineer recommended that a drain tile system be in-
stalled to facilitate ground water drainoff. The
estimated construction cost is $160.00.
3. The plans contemplate excavation of 4,800 cubic
yards of material from within the R.O.W. to con-
struct the street boulevards. The actual amount of
excavation performed was 3800 cubic yards resulting
in a decrease of 1000 cubic yards of common excavation
from plan quantities.
The excess common excavation was planned to be used
in the construction of the ponding -dikes adjacent to the
Maple Knoll Townhouse site. The decrease in common
excavation resulted in a deficiency in available
material for the dike embankment. Additional material
is therefore required for the dikes. The estimated
amount of common borrow needed will result in a cost
of $1,350.00.
I
4. The contractor, Total Asphalt Construction Co.
has requested that the contract completion date
be extended from July 15, 1981 to August 15, 1981.
We believe that the amount of extra work added to
the original contract, the shut down time due to
inclement weather and the strikes by the unions
are delays beyond the contractors control.
We have contacted the HUD officials in regard to
the time extension and were, advised that the request
reasonable and will not affect the grants.
The extension of time will not result in any increase
in the contract cost.
We herewith recommend that the City Council approve the
requested change in contract as delineated under Contract
Amendment No. 2. This will result in a net increase to
the original contract amount of $10,615.00 and an extension
of the completion date to August 15, 19810
DJP /mn
TOTAL ASPHALT CONSTRUCTION
475 W. MINNEHAHA AVE
ST. PAUL, MINN. 55103
PHONE - 488 -2585
Sc' oell &C Madson, Inc.
50 1 inth Avenue So.
z1opkirs, , irnesota 55343
ul`T 14, 1981
i
Ci t ". of 7llaplewood
Sout * ?rive :mprovemer t
Pro4ect io. 7 Q-15
Attn : Dan C ampbell
se ntlemen :
We would like to request an extension of the completion date on the
above captioned project.
,I,r,e contract completion date being Jul 15, 1981 wic h date we will
not be able to meet for a number of reasons:
1, Several weeks of wet weather that has slowed progress.
2. Addition_ of sewer main ai=d services.
3. Additional water services, and lowering of existing
services.
4, tTna ..le to complete storm sewer, dikes and catch basics
in town house area, due to past and present strikes by
construction workers,
5. Discover; of unsatisfactory sub -grade material t1 at will
need special correction work prior to placing of base,
curb and blacktop on Southlawn.
Tt is difficult to establish a definite time for completion with
the continuing strike and not being able to proceed in that part of the
construction area. -
'e will complete the french drain by tl_e end of this week and we
should ',e able to finis'►1 South-lawn by the 15th
day of .�, and
restoration through the easement. A�=-
Yours truly,
Vern L. Alberts, f1r.
Total Asp :alt Corstruction Co.
VA:db
MAILING ADDRESS: P.O..Box 4189, St. Paul, MN 55104
I
RESOLUTION
DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota
has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project No. 79 -15 and
has let a construction contract therefore pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 429,
-
AND WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that
said contract be modified and designated as Improvement
Project No. 79 -15, Contract Amendment #2.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
4'-- MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby
authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by
executing said Contract Amendment #2.
/mb
f�
jE SNOW
August 3, 1981
STAFF REPORT
To: City Manager Barry Evans
From: 'Director of Publi Safety R. W. Schaller
Subject: Bids for Furnace-Air Conditioner Repair and Replacement
The following bids have been received for the repair or replacement of roof
heater -air conditioner unit:
Compressor New
.Replacement Unit
Palen Kimball $3,847.00 $9
Snelling Company. $3,938.00 $9
Kath Brothers No bid $10,982.00
Above bids in writing will be available b the City Council meeting
� y y g on August 6,
1981
Staff recommends that the bid of Palen Kimball for a new unit be accep ted.
.RWS : j s -_
cc Al Peloquin
Building File
Finance Director
Lieutenant Cusick
Action by Council.:,
Endoro
f .
D a t. eM
August 3, 1981
STAFF REPORT
To: City Manager Barry Evans
From: Director of Public Safety R. W. Schaller
Subject: Failure to Third Floor Furnace - Municipal Building
On Wednesday, July 29, 1981, the third floor furnace -ai r conditioner unit on
the
Municipal Building was reported as blowing hot air. Our regular service company,
Palen Kimball, was called. g
They responded and found the compressor had failed.
Due to the very hot humid weather, they attempted a temporary repair, but it did
not work.
P y p ,
They examined the system and determined a new compressor and blower shaft were
e
needed at a minimum. They estimate the cost at around $4,000. However, they
recommend very strongly against repairing this sixteen- year -old unit. A new
unit will cost dust under $10,000. Of the three companies we have asked to
bid, they all strongly recommend that a new unit be installed.
s ailed.
Staff recommends a budget transfer from Account Contingency 161 -4910 to Account
115-4410 if the City y
ty Council elects to repair the present unit or from Account
Contingency 161 -4910 to Account 115 -4730 for replacement. Staff very strongly
y 9 y
feels a new unit will be the most cost effective and dependable in the long run.
The final bid tabulations w i l l be presented at the City Council meeting n
9
Au ust 6 19810
y g °
RWS: js-
cc Al Peloquin
Building File
Finance Director
Lieutenant Cusick
1
July 30, 1981 x . A - /
STAFF REPORT
To: City Manager Barry Evans
From: Chief of Police R. W. Schaller
Subject: Award to Officer Daniel Mettler for Meritorious Service
Officer Daniel Mettler was nominated for .,the Westinghouse Security Systems,
Incorporated, award for outstanding and meritorious service to his
community. They have selected him for the award for the month of July.
This is in recognition of his discovery, while off duty, of an abandoned
stolen boat on May 29th, the diligent investigation of the case and the
apprehension of a suspect in its theft. W.S.S.I. desires to present him
with a token award of $100 from their company. They have requested permission
to make this brief recognition award before the City Council meeting on
August 6, 1981.
RWS : j s
cc 81- 006207
Deputy Chief Hagen
Lieutenant Delmont
Officer Mettler
Personnel Files
Z , <
— � � �. ..r .. c.• �.. ..... ar•.acaP'ar X � .W _ � :vuF� � FIT.?i��e+vty�? ¢ •)f :!'M! irir;.n a:(: n,. ..f 1.. � SrI : 11 • y f Vi a-
i 1 •.Ca b"rw �' y' Y� �1 \�,��+��q. r •'�7y��y����f 1 y��y�' 4
f ry i. lv. ;..t, '. > {(gL. } 6 ti : �• i !ki r { t �(A��n� r 7V
5' .�f c 1 f[ � i 'f,3` ~*f f � . ,,., '� � i; � `y �,r.�.t • q _� .y \. ern 7� ypt•. , y �� '��.���,• 9•��CL�'9,�a ' �' h �r � � ! " �� ..� ..
� 5 ,� �ti ? "� 77 S �' ��i•. .�,5 a ' 'k; y .F•. r �`+�' a!
r
♦ {14
MINNEAPOLIS, �
' IS , MIIvTNESOTA SUM�1 .P i", ►`::� `, `",
IJ 1981
!,) C C T A ..? •k v A
Our award program for police off icers has been well received since it bonan in
January. I' e have given $100 U. S. savings bonds to off icers from Bloomington,
tvayzata, Plymouth, and Orono. You'll be seeing more winners in your local v eek-
ly newspapers, each winner havi done something that w e would normally not hear
of but i:; worthy of commendation. we're glad to be getting publicity to the of-
ficers For these actions.
• 't - :•,� °- ••• . *�j: i•Z •:.. + "' _•'••.�'..tj •�,,••����' �� ;�y: ��:�ij:►�• " -j �y� .���� :- •�• ?; -• ,��•• ;• .:�- •
• - • •. •• s4 Aar. ^j4'.V i' ♦ �r�. �ey.�. ��r.• -R• ! �.• .•.
e
.r . 'fir' ,. x.'... � i : .: "Iw'. wf..R .t 7o ,, w -.,.. �iti �'•� }• �►.. ►'..� ,.w.. t•.�. '. tii • ' • • • : • . • : • : '
• .. -. . _ ._. t .1" v ,.r. � ;�.. •i• �i ,' y... , Nr -r�jn T � r•. Mw f�. �... �..•. vh.. A •.�.a',b•"tA�•- •1r••(.y.+,r ✓.►r ..1 M.��....•. ._...i. .. w. •.:.�..•w •
.:. ♦lnd'L :.. •.:.s:.�t':.•'�:inr,Li.e4j -i av� *v;+�l�•Mvr'.�74:i .. � !: '.fit, .n . ,T . +, .�. • ie �� wti- •' � !. -• �.
Pi�ortc' dt" ..�.,•w,ralRt Tc*+mroa».. r,..r,�.4. >yr«. ,a rr : • 4 ; : •� s r
w - •••.+t 1A�.'.:�.yia,.M. vJ`.ti .v- .tA °•.- W.•M•+ • w!i- .i:�rl•w'vl. "XS..: -. a... �. -..c .,.. iy. :. 1:. f4'1�Li`i�:l••v'.:.�4�..:...1.4 o�ren - i�•..}. • ,,:•+.t'.t. <..•...: •, -
a.
C
or
cl l*- r
0
MAP]
L-A E
WCO
` r 1380 FROST AVENUE MAPL 'W
1✓ C)OD MINNESOTA 55
612 - 770 -4530 DEPARTMENT OF PU 13LIC SAFETY-OFFICE OF CHIEF
OF POLICE
Officer Daniel Mettler
Maplewood Police Department
1380 Frost Avenue
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Officer Mettler:
June 25, 1981
It has come to my attention that during the early morning ours of May 29
1981 while you were off d 9 y '
y o duty traveling home from your duty shift, you
observed a suspicious boat and trailer near Beam Avenue and Hazelwood Street.
You investigated the matter and found a muddy rail behind '
y the trailer. The
boat had the engine and control panel stripped from its hul 1 . The muddy tire
tracks you to a house west of Highway y
g way 61 on Beam Avenue. At that location
on
you recovered an expensive 75- horsepower motor, seats and other accessories
from the boat.
As a result of your excellent police work, a suspect was apprehended and
charged with three p pp
g e counts of felony theft, Th•
is performance on your part
reflects very favorably upon yourself as well as our de artment. Please accept
cept
m y personal appreciation. As a token, a copy of this commendation w i l l be
placed on your personnel record.
Sincerely yours,
RWS:js
cc Personnel Files
Deputy Chief Hagen
Lieutenant Delmont
81- 006207 -
R. W. Schaller, Chief of Police
Maplewood Police Department
WSSI OFFICER OF THE MONTH AWARD
Police Department Jurisdiction Maplewood Police
Police Chief /Supervisor R. W. Schaller
Month of June 1981
Our Nominee Daniel Mettler
Outstanding Service Yerf ormed for C ol it y (See attached news-
paper article .and commendation.) officer Mettler is a dedicated cani
officer. His actions in this i nstan�e are typical cal of his continuing
Yp
outstanding police work and-represent the high level of performance
that earns for our profession the respect of the. public we serve.
Nominated by R. W. Schal Date 6 -25 -81
Return by 5th of next month to:
WSSI AWARD
Westinghouse Lu i ld in a
35Q1 S. Highway 100
Minneapolis 55416
Winner to be announced each 10th of month for P reviou s month
Presentation to be made at date of next City Council meeting
Poke 17A
THE REVIEW Wed., June 17 198i ,.
Palice l
I + • •
.A
•
outh commits suici Ma ple wood de
lead to arrests
Thomas Michael Jaeger, 17, foster son
p.m. until 6 a.m. at a jab which he ap-
The Maplewood Police Department has
of Keith and Sharon Miller, 1654 E. County
parently hoped would last through the
made arrests for several local crimes
Road B, was discovered June 5 at 4:30
p.m., hanging froin a tree at the corner of
summer. ,1
The Millers reported again June 4 that
com e weeks.
i t d In the last three
The police have charged 'Tim M•
Woodlynn' Avenue and Ariel Street.
Thomas had not come home from school.`
Klemenko, 24, of Shoreview in connection
"There was no sign of foul play,"
g P Y,
discovered Thomas had been fired
Police co
with the May 29 theft of a motorboat, and
Maplewood Deputy Police Chief Thomas
from his job when he returned to wor
Richard Barnet 3s of Richfield in con-
Hagen. The manner of death was of-
June 4. '
-
nection with the burglary of three local
f icially pronounced as suicide, according
His body was discovered Friday ato
businesses
to Dr. Michael McGee, assistant medical
ternoon, hanging by.a white nylon cord
Klemenko was apprehended after some
examiner for Ramsey County.
feet a few inches off the ground. Nei h -. 0
'�
unusual detective work by Officer Daniel
The details of Jaeger's death remain
boring children had seen the body earlier;
nto
?Mettler. Mettler, an officer who patrols
uncertain. Police have released some
but had assumed that it was a live figure
;ire
Maplewood with a trained police dog, was
facts uncovered by their investigations,
standing in the woods, according to Dr.
returning home after his night shift at S
but they have not disclosed the names of
McGee. .•
a.m. on May i9 when he saw a boat and
the parties who last saw Jaeger or found
Thomas head lived with the TlilleF'
trailer
trailer abandoned in the east -bound lane
him.
family for five years. His natural paren'S
"lie
of Beam Avenue, near axle intersection
was first reported missing by
are deceased and the Millers were hl$
)nN
with Hazelwood Street, according to
his foster arenas on June 2 at 9:25 m.
P•
foster family, according to 1~;eittl
only foss _ y, g
•�'
Deputy Police Chief Thomas Hagen.
Police located him the next morning in
Miller, a St. Paul ''iceman.
po
Mettler investigated the boat and saw
i
class, taking his final exams at Forth
Thomas is survived by the :Millers, their
that it had been stri.Wod of its motor and
High School, according to Hagen. They
three natural children -- Kristen,
control panel.
conferred with school officials and
Timothy and Steven, and another foster
ent
It had recently rained and Mettler and
parents, who said they would follow up on
son, Peter Brown.
i in
another officer were able to follow the tire
the matter, Hagen explained.
Funeral services were held at the
trucks west on Beam Avenue, across
Thomas started a new job with a local
Mlueller -Biel Funeral Chapel in St. Paul
Highway 61, to the 1100 block of Beam.
custodial service on the evening of June 3,
and interment is at Forest Lawn
Police observed tools laying around the
according to Hagen. He worked from 10
Memorial Park, 1M Edgerton.
le }
front yard of the house and when they
Ian
es
!a
looked into the back shed they saw a 75
horsepower motor.
F ire d m o l e
foar
r-
a
K hen they went to talk to the resident
:
they found yet more boat parts in the
house. The owner said he did not know
An early morning fire June 13 destroyed
Units from all fMaplewood ive Maplew fire
how they got there, according to Hagen.
a pole barn at Mogren Brothers Land-
stations were dispatched to the scene. -
of
Police have charged Timothy M.
soaping, 2582 White Bear Ave.,
Police units from Maple vood and North
his
Klem enku of Shoreview with three cuuiits
Maplewood
St. Paul assisted with traffic control.
;use
of felonious theft. They are still in-
According to Maplewood Fire Marshall
The last fire unit left the scene about 9
uth
vestiga.ting the homeowner, but have not
Al Schadt, fire fighters were called to the
a.m. Schadt said the pole barn was
ring
filed any charges, Hagen said.
scene at 5:09 a.m. Upon arrival the roof
destroyed. Damages was estimated at
ball
The owner of the boatiie also from
and two-thirds of the structure were on
$165,OW-
J. A
Shoreview, reported that had pur-
fire, Schadt said.
The fire is suspected to have started in a
ding
chased the boat just four days earlier and
in addition to the building, Schadt said
ventilator motor.
dale
still did not have insurance for it, Hagen
that many of the vehicles stored in the
ry
No Injuries were reported. Schadt said
said.
building were also burning when fire
a night watchman sleeping in the building
In another case, Hagen reported that
fighters arrived.
escaped unharmed.
the police have recovered most of the $900
in cash stolen May 17 from Windsor
q � = � � � � `"3 1 Cod N = = � � r` = =
r - of
Landscaping and Northern Energy
Under New Management /Get Acquaint Special
heir
Uf
Products, both of 26W White Bear Ave.,
Saints North Roller Skatin Center
; a- T�
CLIP
THIS' C OU PON
and g
1818 Gervais Ave.
• �
AND SAVE ;►�• 0
v Oh l ..
Richard Barnet of Richfield was
,.
. �
ON ANY
s on
arrested by Dakota County authorities for the burglary of a VFW club in Rosemount.
The arresting authorities searched his car
, _
r v'
- =:
'his
bag
Reg. $25.00 or Ovor With Coupon
a d found a of move with a
Maplewood address on it Hagen said.
,ga,
ILI
0
W hen the Dakota Count y Sheriffs
a
Office called the Maplewood police, local
authorities had not yet heard of any
S Of§
-
S, Fmm
Poolseft
and
burg laries to the area Ha
burg en said. Police g
-da Y
went to check the addresses on White
With this coupon thru July 31, 1981
.rum
Bear Avenue, however, and found the
had been broken i nto, he
Shin Care
10% DISCOUNT
ALWAYS
FOR SENIORS
buildings con-
Program �4AONDAY, TUESDAY
the
tinned.
_
AND WEDNESDAYS
arch
Ji ve
As a final note, Maplewood police found
a ripped $20 bill on the counter of Windsor
TA 0 a
Landscaping which perfectly matched a
,a.
js
bill found in Barnet's
cuss
an of
torn corner of a $20
po Hagen said.
po
2578 E. 7th A► v e.
�
"Y77=2646
Barnet has now been charged with two
N orth fit. Paul
counts of burglary.
E _A ow. lwm�
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Community Design Review Board Membership Status and
Appointment of New Member
DATE: July 15, 1981
Mecbershi p Status
The following is the current membership status of the Board:
Tony Phillippi
Appointed - March,
1979
1st term
expired -
January
1,
1981
2nd term
expires -
January
1,
1983
Vi ctor Lydon
Appointed
- August,
1980
1st term
expires -
January
1,
1982
Donald Moe
Appointed
- January
22, 1981
1st term
expires -
January
1,
1982
Robert Folley
Appointed
- January
22, 1981
1st term
expires -
January
1,
1983
Vacancy To fulfill remainder of a two -year term ending
January 1, 1983
Vacancy To fulfill remainder of a two -year term ending
January 1, 1982
ie
Si January 1, 1980 the Community Design Review Board has been functioning
with only partial membership (three to five persons) in spite of Staff's
continual advertising efforts to f i l l vacancies.
Operating on less than full membership can create a problem, since it increases
the potential for meeting cancellation due to a lack of quorum, as was the
case on June 9, 1981.
NOW MOMkOV-
At their July 14, 1981 meeting, the Community Design Review Board recommended that
Council appoint Mr. Thomas Deans to fill a vacant seat on the Board (see enclosed
application) His appointment would be to fulfill the remainder of a two -year
term ending January 1, 1983.
Acti by Co rci.l::
Enclosed:
Application to the Community Design Review Board
a
APPL1C.'i ION TO THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
The Maplewood City Council has requested the .Community Design Review Board to
review candidates for appointment to the Community Design Review Board.
This application will be reviewed by the Board Members and recommendations will
be forwarded to the C ity Council. Thank you for your interest-in our work.
Please return this application to: Planning Director, City of Maplewood
.x.380 Frost Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
NAME D TE
ADDRESS t - 2 - PHONE : WORK V .00 O
RESIDENCE
YES NUMBER OF YEARS aW ESt V> p'JT
AGE HOMEOWNER NO RESIDENT OF MAPLEWOOD V Q
EDU CATION to , a Sr 1 • C.,.1 V ! l..
1
PRESENT OCCUPATION AND EMPLOYER _ CtV L �JCs iVC�L�
PREVIOUS JOB EXPERIENCE AND EMPLOYERS (LIST LAST THREE) -fir E cam- ; t�.�' C%S•� ,
ORGANIZ TIONS (PROFESSIONAL, CIVIC CHURCH, SCHOOL, ETC. PAST OR PRESENT)
S LC . O t (._. t t�.aC - c ?--)
OFFICES HELD (ORGANIZATIONAL)
BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE IN PLANNING OR DESIGN REVIEW (if any) t,-S7-D wk - 14
� - NV �' DN • t M t�/ - SGT ,t�,T �. 7 5 t,� iZ L-J A w �
Sit � Nit ls
COMMENTS: : C& L cp-, -- S. t � ' H � t ST'o �2.� Or-
APA .
u. feO v 1 K3 !_s
a
C. Interview
The Board interviewed Tom Deans for the vacant position on the Board.
Chairman Phi l l i ppi moved the Board recommend the City Council appoint
Tom Deans to the vacant position on the Board
' Board Member Lydon seconded Ayes - all
MEMORANDUM
T0:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
RilPLICANT /OWNER:
PAOJ E CT
DATE:
Request
City Manager
Director of Community Development
Renewal of Special Use Permit
2730 Hazelwood Street
Health Resources` Inc.
Health Resource Center
July 29, 1981
Ftwo
action by C ou y , r ; ;
Endo rScal
bat
Renewal of the special use permit to conduct community service programs
and approval to expand the parking lot.
Proposal
The applicant is proposing 86 new parking stalls. Refer to the enclosed
plan. Refer to the enclosed staff report of July 16, 1980 and the applicant's
letter of request dated June 5, 19810
Past Actions
8 -7 -80: Council approved a special use permit for the applicant to operate
the community service programs, with the following conditions:
I. The permit shall be good for one year. It may be renewed if Council determines
that the use had no adverse affect on the neighborhood. The concerns for
parking spaces can be discussed at that time
2. Striping of the parking lot for 52 spaces
3. The City shall have a continued use of the ball diamond providing it does
not conflict with the use of the applicant
4. The City shall sign a hold harmless agreement absolving Health Resources, Inc.
of any injury l i a b i l i t i e s for City use of the facilities
5. The applicant shall appear before the Council if an increase of the number of
parking stalls beyond the 52 spaces is needed within one year proceeding the
renewal of their special use permit
714 -81: The Community Design Review Board recommended approval of a sign size
variance for the applicant, subject to the following conditions:
L -Sign copy shall be limited to tenant identification and program identification
2. The temporary sign shall be removed
3. The applicant shall obtain a sign permit from Staff
511
4. If necessary, the illumination of the sign shall be shielded in a manner
to protect adjacent property owners from any possible nuisance.
5. Sign lighting shall be extinguished at 11:00 p.m.
Analysis
Ia - the . Heal th Resource Center's f rst year of operati on, the Ci ty has not
received any complaints from the neighbors,
There is an apparent need for additional parking spaces. During an inspection
of the site, Staff found the parking lot to be full with cars also parking in
drive aisles, along the street, and on the grass. Staff, therefore, agrees
that the parking lot should be expanded.
Recommendation
I . Approval to renew the special use permit for the Health Resource Center,
since there has not been any problems caused by this facility after one
year of operation.
II, Approval of the proposed parking lot expansion, based upon the need for
additional parking space. Approval is-subject to providing 10 foot wide
stal 1 s .
Enclosed:
1. Memorandum dated 7 -16 -80
2. Applicant's letter dated 6 -5 -81
3. Parking lot expansion plan
-2-
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Special Use Permit
LOCATION: 2730 Hazelwood Street --
APPLICANT: Health Resources, Inc. :.
OWNER: _ Independent School District No. 622
DATE: = July 16, 1 980 +
Request
Approval of a special use permit to conduct community service programs at the old
Hazelwood Elementary School building.
Site Description
1. Refer to the enclosed maps for location and property lines.
2. Acreage: 10 acres
3. Existing land use: The vacated Hazelwood Elementary School and pl ayf i el ds
Surroundign Land Uses
Northerly and Easterly: Hazelwood Park, which includes a . pond and soccer fields
Southerly: a 4.39 acre parcel, with a single-dwelling home fronting on County Road C
Westerly: Hazelwood Street. West of Hazelwood are several s i ngl.e -dwel 1 i ng homes on
larger lots.
Proposed Use
l.' Refer to enclosed Exhibit "B" and the enclosed summaries of several prog.rams from
brochures put out by St. John's.
2.. The Adolescent Outpatient Chemical De endence Program has been operating n a
P. 9 .p g t 17 09
N. McKNi ght Road for the last 11 years. Staff has received no complaints. This
program would be relocated to the Hazelwood School site.
3. The Adult Chemical Dependence, Home Health Care, and Community Education programs
would be relocated from St. Johns Hospital on the east side of St.. Paul.
4. The purpose of relocating these programs is the need for additional space.
Past Adtions
8- 26 -76: Council approved a special use permit for a . dru -counsel in treatment program
at the Gladstone Community Center (1945 Manton Street), subject -to a one year
review by the Council to determine if Conti n-ued use is warranted. The program
never started, because they were not able to get a lease from the School District.
1
Planni
P '
. The Land Use Plan designates • this site for school use. The Planning om -
designated this site for service comm 9 mission has
non- school uses. comme rcial use on the Plan update, to reflect
210 The Plan for Maplewood ewood
p states the following obj ectives:
a "The Village should insti '
i tute a comprehensive health and sanitati on program
which should i ncl ude:... F. Evaluatin
= n9 the ever increasing drug problem
and
suggesting methods of control and correction; "
(p.89)
b. "The Village should actively support '
Y pp t soc � al welfare programs which: ... e .
Encourage the churches, civic and fratern organizations of Maplewood to
stimulate, coordinate, strengthen and r •
9 pro de human s ervi c es ces i n the
community (pp. 89 - 90)
C. "Al s educational programs, buildings di
. 9 � ngs and facilities � ti es w� the n the Village should
provide for. .... c. Utilization as commune t (p.93)
_ y i nvolvement vement centers"
3. Zoning: F, -Farm Residence
4. Section 911.010 of the City Code er-mi is comma •
of an du p c ommunity centers or any institution
t� tuti on
y educ ational, perm
cats onal , • philanthropic, anthropi c, or charitable nature in an z •
by special use i t. Y z oning d
P
.5 . There are no . s eci fi c number P r of parking spaces required by Code for a communit
cen ter,
Y
6. The applicant estimates that their eak use would uld be from 8 - 9 A.M. Monday and
would need 48 52 spaces.
7. The enclosed plan shows how they would res tri e t '
cars,
p he existing ng lot to park 52
P u b l i c Works
I : Hazelwood Street is a City street built •
Y to rural standards (no curbing, two
1 ane) . The Ci ty has _no pl ans for u radi n Hazelwood P9 g Street I n the near future.
2. The- exi s ti n right-of-way i s - '
9 9 y 66 feet w
- 3. The 1979 Barton- Aschman Transportation Stud p roposes -
Study p poses Hazel wood _ Street as a
minor arterial and eventual - to be up to f •
p9 our lanes. Thy s Study also
the e xisting ting traffi c at 1100 vehicles per da • i T,
estimates incre
hour p day; sing to a peak
volume of 11
00 v ehicles per hour by the year 2000.
2
Parks
The City is using . the ball diamonds as part of the adjacent park. The Director
of Community Services has requested that the City be allowed to continue using
them as a condition the special use permit.
Public Safety
The Director of Public Safety feels that Hazelwood o Street should be ._upgraded and
that there should be adequate parking provided.
Social `
Val uabl a community service programs would be made more accessible to re s i dents
es� dents
of Maplewood and the surrounding area.
Citizen Commen
A survey was sent out to the property owners within 200 feet of the site. Of
the seven replies, three had no objections and four had objections. The following
objections were listed:
1 . Increased traffic
2. A chemical dependency treatment program is not compatible ble with a "
p residential
dents al
neighborhood
3. Harmony School would be a better location
4. Property wi 11 be devalued
S. A fear of drug addicts comin into the neighborhood
9 g
Analysi s
It is not easy to find a use for a school building that is no longer used for a
school. The conversion of the Gladstone School on Manton and Frost into a communit
center is a good example of how effective this can be.
The use should not have any adverse impact on the neighborhood and would P rovi de valuable - community service programs to residents of Maplewood and surrounds n .
9
areas. The one year renewal will give Council the opportunity of reviewin 9 the
use after one year.
Recommendation
Approval of a special use o permit for the operation of the proposed commun i t se r i c
i P p y v e
programs or si mi 1 ar uses , i f approved by the City Council, with the followin
condi tions:
.1. The permi shal be. good for one year. It may be renewed if Counci 1 determines
that the. use has had no adverse impact on the neighborhood
2. Striping of the parking lot for 52 spaces
3
j
i
i
ball 1 di arnonds , provided i t does
3. The Ci t shall be allowed to continue use of the
y b the not conflict with the use of the diamonds y applicant
absolving Health Resources, Inc.
-all
sign n a hold harmless agreement, abs 9
4. The City shall
9
f an injury 1 iabil itv for City use of the'facilities.
o y � y
i
Action by Council;
Endorse l�
hodified�
Re j ected�.
Date .�2L T7
En closures
1. Location Map
2. Property Line Map
3. Exhibit "B:
4-
BE
...•rte .�►
Ko h /m` on - =�
AVE
BE AM AVE = %�
/ ►-I _ _ RA AT
cr
{
4 I - •` i 11
4
W 1
t' Q
.� W F
1 �
- -'--' -- ~ - K O H L 11A A N AVE
2
ROAD ..C.� ' >
couNTY J , ,
?
P 4n
J �f fN J
Lu J tiaJ q ~
a ;; z u- EDGEHILL RD.
3 Q j,
V �= Q Q J I
tt f J
Z
c _ DEMONT ,,� AVE.W +�
D `
! C '- O _
(BROOK .+lE.
1'
61
GERVAIS
N
j LARK AVE.
J
:DU T Y O i l
z
LEL AND a I
JUNCTION AVE .
e z 8U N
�pN AV
=
SK ~'
cc AVE
off 1 r :. FIF
f W _ (f tr
SEXTA 'NT AVE.
AVE_ _ GERVAIS , AVE.
G I RANDVIEw
36 VIKING OR.
1 SHERREN AVE
COPE 1 AVE. -==" _ COPE AVE --JE
✓� LARK AVE. v� LARK A VE. �' v
R L4I URIE RD. Z cr [ LAURIE] R0. x
O '4 D a
25 1 AN HURST 2 z AVE.
Z 6,
;Z 7
a
W
RKE AVE. �- BU [R V, :AVE
cc C
ELDRIDG E J AVE Q �. I
J
64
BELMOIV ar AVE . ^
SKILLMA N m AVE. NAR R15
i Q 4, ROSE WOOD AVE.
S� R Y LAN
RvE Q. J J� cr
Q P av�P
F 1= F 0 t..; ►- � �.P 2 W�
A V£ sn to &A WIL J
L �
Q d CIR ;/
coo .tu cn A% J W �S '.. r. ~
LOCATION MAP
4
N
goo
'
ViL AGE
of IAA PL C Vo'D' ; PC." Jr, N AR��
V
13th - 7 1 '
!
a�
4
r
t
f. • 3 Lxz
mac_,
.. r: Ca �-pN t.pJt Ta/
. ,
.:
Lli
c
r t
►-.�
l
1
4'0 '
r
`��
♦
71
•
N ) k
~
•
- 2�
-
s
dl
��.� �
- -
tom•
�w
14
a ♦�� C
•
—
c 0 - T -
MR
PROPERTY LINE MAP
EXHIBIT "B"
.(Precise use, urs
P ursuant to paragraph 4 of S •
.pedal Use Permit Ap 1 icat •
P ion dated June 13 1980
The followi owe n _ ed u c ational, 9 •philanthro
service is c
_programs, acts v� t� es P charitable and soc� at a •
and uses: and community
1 • Adolescent out
dependence program, outpatient •
P g m. The s program will c P ent chem� cal
consist of:
high school A. Substitute element
9 0l education, by Inde element and
teachers, on th pendent School District No.
e preen ses . 622
and counseling . Individual and group 1 � ng sessions relate v g uP therapy
relati ' chemical dependency,
Y
C. Other techniques i
deemed ne ues an •
cessary to maintain abs q d serve ces
parted pants in t sty Hence on the part of th
he program, e
General ' ly the a rt e c i •
P pants will l arrive a t .
the premises � n the mor '
throughout the day. The ne n�n9 o
weekdays and remain throw n
to ma ntai n flexi*bi l i t e need of the Applicant i can
Y n its manner of providing PP t i s stressed
tinning the general use P ing this service '
of 'the premises' for this ' wh e con-
purpose.
2. Adult chemical de
This program is seen • e
l.ar to the adolescent p ndenc program.
subs education,
program, but i t does no
. t include
program provides limited 3 • Home-Health Care r -
services to persons program. T
.hospital services in who do not have the
. � their r homes . The p need for
and equj pment storage for P perty we 11 provide offi ce space
9 the program, as well as
program may have, any other space needs
the
program provides educate Community Education program. educational materials , classes • ' P gram• This
related subjec struction i n health ts , such a and in
health
to the entir chi 1 db1 rth , diabetes and -
re community. The property � cancer and heart disease
y ould be used for
classroom
her uses to serve the s office
and storage space and other �
5-
Other social
chary table, and he and c ommunity service,
i
health related programs APPS i.�ant or its rel a g and activities , rove ded -
ted companies or throw by the
rental to, other agencies 9h cooerte cooperative efforts wi
have been or entities. Although th , or
n made, i t is anticipated foll owing no final or formal arrangements
associ with that the activ iti es - 9 nts
the premi ses , as well a could become
this time, s others not listed or anticipated at
A. Child Da Care Center.
B . Comprehensive Senior Citizens
Services,
Co Use of recreational
the Communit in a Variet of ways, -facilities b
Do Youth oriented ' counselin
service (East Communities Youth Service Bureau).
E. Offices and pro space for an
social communit charitable and health related services
.
In summary, we desire a speci al use permit,
to provide at the premises, or to permit the use of the premises for, a variet of
communit s-ocial, charitable and health related functions, man of which are known,
but man of which cannot be specificall anticipated at this time.. Wincerel
believe that such a use of this buildin will prove a e s uni and valuable asset to the
communit and that it wil integrate with and enhance the hospital and health related
facilities which the Applicant., in conjunction with St.. John's Hospital, hopes to
develop on a site approximatel one block north of the propert under consideration
here.
Health Resources, Inc*
2696 Hazelwood Avenue • Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 • Telephone 612/770 -9133
June 5, 1981
Mayor & City Council
1380 Frost Avenue
Maplewood, Minnesota
of Maplewood
55109
Dear Mayor & City Council Members:
On August 7, 1980, we appeared before the City Council of
Maplewood, Minnesota, in their chambers, for a public
hearing regarding a request by Health Resources, Inc. for
a special use permit to operate a community services program
at 2696 Hazelwood Avenue, the former Hazelwood Elementary
School. The approval of that special use permit carried
with it several conditions, among which was, the period
of approval shall be one year and renewal by the Council
would be determined twelve months following. That period
of renewal is coming up this coming August of 1981 and we
do hereby request.said renewal.
In our petition for special use permit there were a number
of programmatical explanations in Exhibit B as to the
precise use for which we intended to use the premises.
That exhibit is attached and is consistent to this point
for those purposes which we have in the past,. and into
the future intend to use the premises at 2696 Hazelwood
Avenue.
Given that the use for the special use permit has not
changed from our original submission, and that renewal
is required, we do by request that we meet with the City
Council on its meeting of August and request a renewal
of our special use permit:.
The second condition stated in the approval of our original
special use permit was that the parking lot be striped
for 52 spaces. This has been done and reviewed with the
Director of Community Development.
A third condition stated in the approval was that the city
-fie allowed to continue to use the ball diamonds for carious
community activities and programs. This has also been
accomplished and it is our understanding, through Mr: Bob
Odegaard, that the city is currently conducting T -ball
HRI • A Pa Corporation
St. John's Hospital • Health Resources Development Company
Health Resource Assistance Corporation
City of Maplewood -2- June 5, 1981
programs on those baseball diamonds.
The fourth condition related to the approval of the special
use permit approval related to the signing of the hold
harmless agreement between the City and Health Resources,
Inc., against any injuries for the city's use of the facilities.
It is our understanding between Health Resources, In_ . counsel
and the City's counsel that this has been achieved.
T-he f if th condition related to Heatlh Resources, Inc,
appearing before the council if an increase in the number
of parking stalls, beyond the 52 spaces mentioned previously,
was needed within one year preceeding the renewal of the
special use permit. Upon discussion of our intentions to
increase the parking lot size with the Director of Community
Development, it was his suggestion that request for renewal
of the special use permit, as well as the request for the
increasing of the size of the parking lot, be joined into
one single appearance before the City Council, therey
allowing an opportunity to deal with all the facts and
discussion . in one hearing,
A diagram of the proposed parking lot expansion will be
following in several days to the Director of Community
Development for his review and we will have several
discussions with him regarding same prior to our request
for a hearing on August 6, 1981. We do appreciate the
opportunity to discuss our use of the premises at 2696
Hazelwood Avenue over the past year with the City Council
and we are hopeful that you will continue to grant renewal
of our special use permit.
S' ce y,
r ld J. C rthy
P sident
Health Resources, Inc.
Enclosure
GJM /jh
PRESENT PARKING RED
PROP05ED PARKIIVC BLACK
PRESENT
AODITIONA-L S6 CAR`
TOTAL 136 CARS
SCA
4 �
C
PLANTED AREA
S�
c�
F
MEMORANDUM
TO:
City Manager
FROM:
Director of Community Development
SUBJECT:
Sign Variance
LOCPeTION:
2696 Hazelwood Avenue
a-
APPL- CANT:
John Pel ant
O WNER:
Health Resources, Inc.
PROJECT:
Health Resource Center
DATE:
June 30, 1981
4
SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL
Request
Approval of a size variance for a freestanding sign in a F, Farm Residence District.
Proposal
1. To erect an internally illuminated 8 by 5 foot freestanding sign. The sign's
lighting would be turned off at 11:00 P.M.
2. The proposed sign would identify the various programs conducted in the-building.
(See sketch of sign and applicant's letters)
3. The proposed sign would be 8 feet in height as required by code, rather than
9 feet as the letter. indicates.
BACKGROUND
Site Description
1. Location: See maps
2. Acreage: 10 acres
3. Existing Land Use: Playing fields and the old Hazelwood School building presently
being used for offices and community service programs. There is an existing 2 by
5 foot temporary sign on the property.
Surrounding Land Uses
Northerly and Easterly: Hazelwood Park which includes a pond and soccer fields.
S
Southerly: A .4.39 acre parcel with a single fami home. -
Westerly: Hazelwood Street," West of Hazelwood Street are several- single fami homes..
Past Action
12- 20 -79: Council approved variances for the Gladstone Community Center's freestanding
sign for size, height and total number of signs, with the following conditions:
1. The horizontal sign board shall only identify the rental agencies within the
building, There shall be no advertising or additional messages permitted.
2. Owner and applicant agree to the above conditions in writing.
8 -7 -80: Council approved a special use permit for the applicant to operate the
community service programs, with the following conditions:
' 1. 5he permit shall be good for one year. It may be renewed if Ceunci l determines
_what the use had no adverse affect on the neighborhood. The concerns for parking
spaces can be discussed at that time
2. Striping of the parking lot for 52 spaces
3. The City shall have a continued use of the ball diamond providing it does not
conflict with the use of the applicant.
4. The City shall sign a hold harmless agreement obsol vi ng Health Resources, Inc.
of any injury l i a b i l i t i e s for City use of the facilities
5. The applicant shall appear before the Council if an increase of the number of
parking stalls beyond the 52 spaces is needed within one year preceedi ng the
renewal of their special use permit.
DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS
Planning
1. Land Use Plan designation: Current Plan - S, School, Plan Update - SC,
Service Commercial.
2. Zoning: F, Farm Residence District
3. State Law requires that the following findings be made before a variance can be
granted:
a. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique
to the individual property under consideration.
b. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
4. Section 818.170 Schedule II of the Sign Ordinance states that the largest
freestanding (ground) sign permitted in a Residential district is eight square
feet.
5. The applicant is proposing a 40 square foot sign.
z
6. -The applicant needs a variance, therefore, of 32 square feet.
CONCLUSION
Ana 1 ys i s
State law requires that two findings must be made prior to the issuance of a variance.
First the variance must be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
Staff feels that this is being met, even though the Sign Ordinance does not address
allowable s i gnage for community service centers in residential districts. These
uses should not be subject to the same requirements as a single-dwelling use.
Staff feels that the proposed sign would be appropriate for the facility and would not
be objectionable as to size, location, or appearance. A community services center, in
particular,has a special need for increased signage, because of the many different
uses it contains.
.Secondly, State law requires that it must be found that strict enforcement would
cause undue hardship, because of circumstances unique to the individual property.
The property has no physical characteristics which would cause a hardship .. The
ordinance, however, creates that hardship in that it does not reca-gni ze the need for
sped al si gnage for community service centers. -
Recommendation
Approval of the variance on the basis that:
1. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance
2. The sign ordinance does not recognize the need for special si gnage for community
service centers in a residential district
3. The proposed sign would be attractive in appearance, would be compatible with
the building, and would. not be objectionable to the surrounding property owners.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. Sign copy shall be limited to tenant identification and program identification
2. The temporary sign shall be removed
3. The applicant shall obtain a sign permit from Staff
4. If necessary, the illumination of the sign shall be shielded in a manner to protect
adjacent property owners from any possible nuisance.
50 Sign lighting shal 1 be extinguished at 11:00 P.M.
Enclosed:
1. = Location Map
20 Property Line Map
30 Proposed Sign _
40 tAppl i cant's letters dated 5 -29 -81 and 6 -16 -81
3
WHITE
�9 VA HEIGHTS L
Q
Q AL
f'
V
LJ t
f—
It AVE
h /m o n
1 Q�C
a
CL
��
3l i t RApATZ L
aY
W
N
KONLM.AN AVE �+�► W KOHLMtAN AVE.
M
.� Z
N
W
CL
0
L
t W AV I M AVE.
m
SE x T INT
Al
AV E. VAt AY
G 6NOVIEw Av
P.
36 -
VIKI DR. CASTLE AV
r-
SNERREN AVE
v� R IN AVE...
COPE AVE. OPE AVE.
LARK AYE. ~ LARK AVE . E,,: ~ LARK AVE.
25
COUN R f LAURIE It D . RD R = � ]
LELAN < ,0 25 = i AvE.
C� s 5
= sa
C JUN TION AVE. y "e" W < = 25
Q
1I
U RKE o[ !- AVE. 8U K AVE, ik ,I (1) —J[
LOCATION MAP
61
ROAD c Y Q
z a = EDGENILL RD. Ul
W'
cr
65
U) = DEMONT AVE. _
V < ~ W
C R 0 Qi AVE 2 0
3
or I
GERMS
4
N
rnt�uty onen f "n"
PROPERTY LINE MAP
N
'
T
V I
' o
VJLL AGE Of MAPS E WOOp PpND1NG AREA
' C ic G
CSC • �
Voc
00
r
I3l1 - 7 1'
23 9 4
c� o
'o
PROPOSED SIGN
3�. ►ac
I
El
! .75oc-
..,
O
z.c,• a
� � i
cl
! 1' �
•.�
��'
p ap
C, O I C
{
�
rkr
T_
IL
w 4 v
Aft.
r
p
,R -
.•
c O-Lori Nt
PROPERTY LINE MAP
N
3"
r
i
M
PROPOSED SIGN
4
N
i
�I
EALTH RESOURCE CENTER
2696 HNZ E.LWDUtz AVE- NUE
3"
r
i
M
PROPOSED SIGN
4
N
iealth Resources, Inc.
403 Maria Avenue • St. Paul, Minnesota 55106 •Telephone 612/228 -3199
May 29, 1981
,Mr. Tom Eckstrand
..City of Maplewood RE: Health Resource
!1380 Frost Avenue sign
.Maplewood, Minnesota 55 10 9
Deax Mr. Eckstrand :
The proposed sign illuminated and sized 8 feet by 5 feet in body and
standing a total of 9 feet above grade will provide the following
advantages*
1. Construction
A. Steel, primed and enameled to match sign faces will provide
a durable, attractive sign. It is designed to fit in with
local surroundings.
B. Signs are designed to be replaceable and repairable. Cover
will provide additional vandal damage protection.
C. Colors will blend in with building decor.
2. Location
A. To be easy to read and identify the building, its residents
during the daily 24 hour period.
B. Location provides with sign of letters the ability to read
the sign from the sidewalk or in a moving vehicle.
3. Size
A. Allows use of signage easily readable.
B. Height allows use in all seasons.
4. Copy
A. Designed to use minimum of space so sign size is kept to a.
minimum.
B. Provide identity to building.
5. Selection
A. Manufacturer and vendor of proposed sign was selected only
after careful study of other outdoor signs used in Maplewood
area.
- Sincerely,
John Pelant
'Area Manager, Environmental Services
HRI • A Parent Corporation
JP/pk
St. John's Hospital • Health Resources Development Company
Suburban Health Assistance Corporation
Health Resources, Inc.
403 Maria Avenue • St. Paul, Minnesota 55106 •Telephone 612/228 -3199
June 16, 1981
Mr. Tom Eckstrand
City of Maplewood -
.380 Frost Avenue
- 'Maplewood , Minnesota 55109
Dear Mr, Eckstrand :
The Maplewood code calls for an outside sign to be not more than 8 square
feet. In attempting to live within the spirit of the law, we asked
our
sign manufacturer for a suggested sign layout that conforms to the
code
requirements. They did inform us that conforming to 8 square feet will
111
not allow distance readability or allow for the complete identity y package.
The sign designer has prepared an outside sign gn which allows
I. Complete identity
2. Minimum expansion of identity information
3. Illuminated
4. Location in complete accordance with Maplewood ewood c d
P codes
-5. Located to fit in with surroundings
6. Location to be readable from the street or sidewalk.
The size suggested is 5 feet by 8 feet or 4Q square f
q eet for the sign .
We ask that you consider granting us an exception to our code re 0
y qu rement .
Sincerely,
John Pelant, Area Manager
Environmental Services
JP/pk
HRI • A Parent Corporation
St. John's Hospital • Health Resources Development Company
Suburban Health Assistance Corporation
6. DESIGN REVIEW
A. Health Resources - Sign Variance
John Pelant, appl i cant, said he had read the staff report
said Mr. Pel ant had talked with the s-urroundi ng
.Secretary Ekstrand s a �
p r ert owners and they had no objection to the sign.
F y
Board Member Moe moved the Board recommend approval of the sign
variance on the basis that:
10 -The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
ordinance.
2. The sign ordinance does not recognize the for special si gnage for
communi service centers in a residential district
3. The proposed sign would be attractive in appearance, would be compatible
with the building, and would not be objectionable to the surrounding
property owners.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. Sign copy shall be limited to tenant identification and program
identification.
2. The temporary sign shall be removed
3. The applicant shall obtain a sign permit from Staff
4. If necessary, the illumination of the sign shall be shielded in a manner
to protect adjacent property owners from any poss bl a nuisance.
5. Sign lighting shall be extinguished at 11:00 P.M.
6. Owner and applicant agree to the above conditions in writing.
Board Member Fol 1 ey seconded Ayes - all .
J
MEMORANDUM
/00:0 U;
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Alley Vacation
LOCATION: South of Sophia Avenue, West of Frank Street A:.
(see enclosed maps)
APPLICANT: Lorraine Ani tzberger
=DATE: June 25, 1981 - �" �_ "�-
7 K . ' M
j
j SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL ��
Request
Vacation of an alley ri ght -of -way
BACKGROUND
Description
1. The alley- is unimproved and 20 feet in width.
2. The right -of -way is presently being used and maintained for residential
purposes by abutting property owners.
3. Two garages (Map 2) appear to located very close to or within the
right -of -way.
Surrounding Land Use
North: Sophia Avenue, across Sophia Avenue is a single - family dwelling
East: Single - family dwellings
South.: Si,ngl e- family dwellings
West: Single- family dwellings and Phalen Place
Planning
1. Land Use Plan Designation: RL, Residential Lower Density
2. Zoning: R -1, Residence District (Single Dwelling)
3. Chapter 412.851 of Minnesota State Statutes states:
"The Council may by resolution vacate any street, alley, public grounds,
publi way, or any part thereof, on its own motion or on petition of a
majors ty of the owners of land abutting on the street, al ley, pu blic
grounds, public way, or part thereof to be vacated . When there has been
no petition, the resolution may be adopted only by a vote = of four - fifths
of all members of the council. No such vacation shall be unless it
appears i n the interest of the public to do so after a hearing preceded
by two weeks' published and posted notice."
4. All properties abutting the right -of -way front on an improved public
street.
Public Works
71. There are no buried public utilities in the subject right
i
20 Overhead u t i l i t i e s are Tocated over the west 10 feet of the right -of-
way. NSP has requested that an easement be retained.
3. There are no plans to improve the right -of -way.
Citizen Comments
1. Owners of nine of the twelve abutting properties signed a petition in
support of the proposed vacation.
2. The owner of Lots 10 and 11 has proposed to use the right -of -way to
access his rear yard from Phal en Place,
3. The owners of Lots 7 -9 and 31 -33 oppose the use of the right -of -way as
a driveway.
CONCLUSION
Analysis
The issue in this case is whether one property owner's desire to use the
alley as a secondary access constitutes a public need to retain the right-
of-way, or portion thereof.
The property owner in question wishes to park his motor home in his rear
yard. Vehicular access to the rear yard is otherwise impossible, due to the
location of trees and his house and garage. The motor home is presently parked
along side his driveway. This location does not appear to be obtrusive or an
inconvenience.
Abutting property owners have established the alley right -of -way for residential
purposes. It has not been used as a roadway for many years, if at all. Mature
lawns, a hedge, and garage are located very close or on the right -of -way, where
the secondary access would be constructed.
The desired secondary access would not serve a public purpose. All of the
subject properties are adequately accessible from a paved street. Secondly,
Tconstructi of the desired secondary access would benefit one property owner,
__ _ at the expense of established yard areas, for a use that is seasonal and possibly
- temporary in nature.
Given this background, staff does not see a public benefit far the retention of
this right -of -way, other than as an easement corridor for ov6rhead utility lines,
-2-
Recommendation
Vacation of the alley right -of -way located within Block 1, Kavanagh and
Dawsons Addition to Lakeside Park, subject to retention of a utility
easement, over the west 10 feet of the right -of -way. _
- Approval is recommended on the basis that:
1. The alley does not, and is not, proposed to serve a public purpose other
than as a corridor for overhead utilities.
2. The right -of -way is being used as rear yard area by adjacent land owners.
3. It is in the public interest to vacate the subject alley right-of-way.
Enclosures:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line Map
3. Statement by the Applicant
4. Petition
5. Resolution of Vacation
-3-
0 Ko h lm o n /
L okt
v
C .
23
J c 0 yN TY
J _
W
v
2
t�
L I l
Z o
v o
N
F MROAD AVE.
U)
� h J
J W
61
GERVAIS
AV E.
<1
r�
RADATZ
W
c <
W KOHL
cr
«
t~
t�f F-
E DGE HILL RD.
� 65
oc
v Z DEMONT AVE _
�tD— AVE. O =
; ;e
l
.nr.n..rw / � •� �
.A.
�i
Round
I 5
} >
4c dt
to IR /�•
SU R -� W 4 cc
W W
ac m 5
2
Wo k e fi a /d
W
O ) t < 1
Loke = - 29
: Q
SOP. L41A `, a`► E �- �, s
� J � Ir W Q 3 < W
P R I E A V 6J - > N
AV _
64 �� 65
ST. PAUL
(MAP 1)
LOCATION MAP
� W
m
SE XT
l�
G � ANDV _ lEW AV
VIKI G OR.
AV
i
VA1S
ti
SHERREN AVE
COPE AVE. co
J LARK AVE. ~ LARK AVE. f.: 1~- LARK AVE. > H
N Q
I LAURIE RD. Z 2: RD, 0 [LAU Y
LELAN
flc X10 2S = T z AVE.
E. @ N
JUN TION AVE. Z h °C Y 64 j =
U RKE . KAVE
t�
N ELDRIDG AVE. 3
� � > PUBLIC WOF
p}t ELMON T s AVE. N 64 > BLDG.
a
= s Q , VE u SKILLMA M m AVE. = HAR Rt3 l•
Soo
V
o N W Q b,,� ROS wo00 AVE.
R RY AN h
Q� ',4r J c
R
R. ,a�`'
< z �.* - t L —
F ROS T t AVE h ~ n H 28 t —
N
30 L
14 a �c
415- CL
r q
7 1 C)
/0 N �_� 4 : s 1 G 1 i
LOO KC - - R IPLEY AV E.' in-S C.#
-PARK
�1
tQ a • =�
Lp s . '�
)L
�A W-r-rT
AV
7 45 21 t 4 -7 %elf -so
C 21=0011 I -
cill 2i
0 16 I%X
_ � w J � !� � / � ' , fi r
/*
A6
��� JAY
.41
, t om
to
I I
..D dVCLlr-.
L-X--A'QLA-.
� �5
CO — 4 — C — )
Ir
40:
r—
',_
a o
D
% 9
-,
o ;
F4
..,.�
t;
t `' ` Q
;+ c
or
Sir
to a7
40
AIN cu
ass tic.
to
14
10
SID
9c
)L
�A W-r-rT
AV
7 45 21 t 4 -7 %elf -so
C 21=0011 I -
cill 2i
0 16 I%X
_ � w J � !� � / � ' , fi r
/*
A6
��� JAY
.41
, t om
to
I I
..D dVCLlr-.
L-X--A'QLA-.
� �5
CO — 4 — C — )
Ir
40:
ICA
lo
',_
a o
D
% 9
4000
� �5
CO — 4 — C — )
Ir
A000
ICA
lo
',_
a o
D
% 9
-,
o ;
o
IC)
..,.�
it loic-14
zk:.,
or
Cl
40
AIN cu
ass tic.
to
SID
ii j
M
-
ir
P-f!
1% 13 -U.. TE-- 4J, F
5 5. 09 -2.641.5
(MAP 2)
PROPERTY LINE MAP
■ 4
ct` /lE y i h h �� � t< o � � o � TLi � ftcL ±tea- n� �.c � G
cZ,c,u S a-,,� C(C( r� T � �o ✓t 7�0 .L-a. l� e. � . e,- ��� .�. �
e!% jo CL
� Gcv-� �/dw ��c. �2is��
rn �z- i �� � Gc� � h � Yl y 7 �',� �� �2 d �' P � � y
y �i b � �. Wa- � 7's T� �r s e ; l �
-PON, .�d fe G ��
� `l -� c� J� � 4 ✓Yl � a� c..J et l,G a� S i /2- � � 5 : ,� , e � T
�. /� e c i A�Z
e ct., Ti a ,�7 c-t-
pet
We the unders i gned, do hereby peti tion the Counci 1 of the Ci ty of Mapl ewood to:
i ~ 1
.7X
e� CA- Cj
and that the said improvement be undertaken by the Village Council in accordance with
the provisions of Minnesota Statutes. Chapter 429; and that the cost thIreof be assessed
against befi tted property as provided by said Chapter 429.
C �i Ek STREET ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION F Oi - DATE
oot -3
/ �t'
a
M
-I certify that I have witnessed the above signatures, and the proposed :improvements were
discussed vj th the signers. -
DA T E (PETITION SPONSOR
C UZ
EL 7z 1
Al,jf
1 e
- - -- i �
j ma c., • l � ,� . - -
� �.._
LO ' v
l
-#- r -- t-
�.
/
SL -.� -k
If A;OOOF
/ S / 6--.1
Z' i:5
/14 (
M
-I certify that I have witnessed the above signatures, and the proposed :improvements were
discussed vj th the signers. -
DA T E (PETITION SPONSOR
y -
PUBLIC VACATION PETITION
We, the undersigned,. bei na a majority of the owners of land abutting on tine (street),
(alley), or -�{ publ i c easement) described as:
i
i
do hereby petition the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, to vacate the above described area.
Name
.Si g nature (Please print or type) Abstractor's List No.
RESOLUTION FOR RIGHT OF WAY VACATION
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851 thereof
the Maplewood City Council, upon petition of a majority of the owners of the land
abutting the al ley) proposed to be vacated, and after a public hearin
preceeded by two (2) weeks published and posted notice, proposes the vacation of the
following described alley ri ht -of -wa 1 in or h of the north li
of the wes l i n e of the south - of Lot 33 • and extens nf
•
the north l i ne of Lot 21 and the easterly extens i on Qf he north 1 ' ne of I at 22 RI 1
Kavanagh and Dawsons Addition to Lakeside Park, Section 16, Township 9, Range 22.
p � 9
WHEREAS,_THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY IS AFFECTED BY THE STREET VACATION:
w
t
WHEREAS, THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY IS AFFECTED BY THE ALLEY VACATION:
Lots 10 -33, -Block 1 Kavanagh and Dawsons Addition to Lakeside Park
Section 16, Township 29, Range 22
and
WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council finds that the vacation of the above described
_cC and alley i s /A )z.R in the interest of the public due to changing land uses and
obsolete platting:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council, Ramsey County, Minnesota, that the
above described (xftgj?5 alley) be and hereby i s /&Re vacated and the City 'Clerk is
hereby directed to prepare a notice of completion of the proceedings pursuant to the
proves i ons of Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851 thereof, and shall cause the same to
be presented to the County Auditor for entry upon his transfer records and the same
shall be thereafter filed with the Ramsey County Recorder, subject to retpnti
uti 1 i ty easement over the west 10 feet of the subject riqht- o ,fw--w!a y
N
i
i
NOTE: If more than one parcel is included in a legal description, list only the
parcel(s) directly affected.
(t
C. Alley Vacation - Edward Street to Sophia Avenue (Anitzberger)
Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting vacation of the
alley- right -of -way. Staff is recommending approval as outlined in their
report.
Chairman Axdahl asked if anyone was present who wished to comment on
this proposal .
i
Commissioner Whitcomb m oved the P1 anni_ng Conv_ni ss i on re co mm en d to the
City Counci 1 that the a lley right -of -way located within Block 1, K avana h
a nd Daw Addition to L akeside Park b e va cated, subject to re tenti o n o
a u t i l i t y . _ easement over the west 10 feet of t he right -of -way. A pproval _
is recommended on the basis that
1. The alley does not, and is not, proposed to serve a public purpose other
x
than as a corridor for overhead u t i l i t i e s ,
_,-
2. The right -of -way is being used as a rear yard area by adjacent land owners.
3. It is in
the public interest
to vacate
the subject alley right -of -way.
Commissioner
Howard seconded
Ayes
- all 0
i
1
MEMORANDUM
T0:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
OWNER/APPLICANT:
DATE:
City Manager
Director of Community Development
Variance
1404 Cope Avenue
Stanley Cernohous
July 1 1981
Aet
SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL
Re guest
Approval of a lot width variance to build on a substandard
corner lot
Proposal
1. Split a parcel into two 80 x 125 foot lots, along an existing platted
lot line (Map 2). (.City approval is not required when a split occurs
along an existing platted lot line.)
2. Each resulting lot would consist of two reviousl 1
1 ots, p y p atted 40 x 125 foot
3. Construct a single-family dwelling on the corner lot
t
BACKGROUND
Site Description
I. Lot size: A 160 x 125 foot corner lot, consisting of four
Tatted l0 u 40 x 125 foot
p is and 10,000 square feet.
2. Existing land use: A single-family dwelling on the westerly terly 80 feet,
located fourteen feet west of the proposed lot,
Surrounding Land Uses
North: Cope Avenue. Across Cope Avenue, undeveloped property, p perty, zoned for Light
Manufacturing and planned for Limited Service Commercial use
East: Birmingham Street. Across _ •
Birmingham Street, a two-family dwelling.
South: An unimproved, 20 foot wide alley right-of-way. 9 y. Across the right -of -way,
a single - family dwelling.
West: A single-family dwelling --
i •
fI
1'
k`I
`EI
Past Actions
November 18, 1976: Council approved l width and ar
ea variances for
construction of a duplex on Lots 15, 16 and the west 5 feet of
89.8 foo lot 14,
Block 2 (an t wide corner 1 ot) , subject ec
J t to Council rezone ng
Lots 13 and the
east 35 feet of Lot 14 from R2 to R1. (There ins no
record of a lot division, per se, being approved.)
g
DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS
Planning
1. Land Use Plan Designation: RL- Residential Lower Densi
2. Zoning: R -1, Residential ( ling)
3. Compliance with Land Use Laws
a. Statutory:
Section 462.357 Subdivision 6 (2) states that the Board of
� Appeals
and Adjustments i s empowered to hear requests for variances from the
literal prove s i ons of the ordinance instances where:
1. strict enforcement would cause undue hardship ecause of
p circum-
stances unique to the individual property
2. where it is demonstrated that such ac •
actions will be � n keeping with
the spirit and intent of the ordinance
b, Ordinance
1, Section 912.080 states that where the Council or Planning
ng Commission
is required to consider an exception or e chan to the Zoning ng Code
in accordan with the provisions of this ordinance, it shall among
other things:
(a) Assure itself that the proposed change i s co '
p g consistent s tent w� th the
spi purpose, and intent of the zoning ordinance.
(b) Determine that the proposed change will not t subs tanti al ly
injure or detract from the use of the neighboring property or
from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of
the property adjacent to the area included i n the proposed
�- P p
change or plan is adequately safeguarded. -
( c) Determine that the proposed change will serve e the best
interests and conveniences of the community (where applicable),
i cabl e
_ pP ),
and the public welfare,
-2-
y (d) Consider the effect of the proposed change upon the logical
i ca
9 p g 1,
effi cient, and economical extension of public services and
facilities such as public water, sewers, police and fire
protection, and schools,
(e) Be guided in its study, review, and - recommenda .�
y � tion by sound
standards of subdivision practice where applicable.
VARIANCE `
2. Section 1005.010(2) states that a corner lot for a residential
single detached dwelling s l be "100 feet wide at the
established building setback line." Lot width, at the buildin
setback li ne, of the
e proposed lot woul be 80 feet, requiring a
variance of 20 feet.
Public Works
1. Sewer and water are available
2.- The subject .property is low and subject to drainage problems. A radin
9 9
plan is to be approved prior to issuance of a bui.l di n 9 permit,
CONCLUSION
Analysis
The purpose of .requiring 100 feet of width for a corner lot is to allow for the
required 30 foot setback from each street and still provide for a buildin
site, similar in width to an interior lot,
.
I n the Immediate vi ni ty, there are three, s i m i l a r - s i z e d , corner lots which
have been developed. Like the proposed site two of these lots consist of
the combination of two previously platted lots.
In-fill development proposals, as in this case, should be encouraged where the
buildable portion of the g •
p lot can accommodate a dwelling compatible e wi th existing
development. Council approved a similar variance request i n 1977 for the proper
•� q p pe ty
to the east, There s no substantive difference between the present ro osal
and the variance ap i p p
pp n 1977 for the property across the street.
The issue in this case is not whether to approve the variance but whether to
require the applicant to increase the width of the ro osed p P l ot. The location
of
the exi dwelling would allow the proposed l to be increased 5 feet in
width. The existing dwelling would be at least 14 feet away rom a dwelling
on the proposed lot, t n separation. y
p p early double the mini mum requi red The wider
separati between structures, from the ers ecti ve of fire '
p P ire protection and
aesthetics, would be more beneficial. than requiring a wider l ot - for the sake of
more consistency with zoning code requirements. The lot, as ro osed, can support
foot wide dwelling, p p
a 45 pp •
• ng, fronting on Cope Avenue. Staff sees no- reason to require
an increase in the width of this lot, in view of the above di
-3-
Recommendation
Approval of the requested lot width variance of 20 feet to allow development
of an 80 x 125 foot corner lot, on the southwest corner of Birmingham Street
and Cope Avenue, subject to a grading and drainage plan being approved b
9 z pp y
the City. Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit.
Approval is recommended on the basis that:
1. Council approved a similar variance for the property to the east.
2. The lot can support a dwelling which would be compatible with existing
neighborhood development and meet all setback requirements.
3. Development of the parcel would be consistent with the intent of the zoning
code.
Enclosures
Location Map
Property Line Map
Applicant's letter of justification
-4-
KOHLMAN i t AVE. J W KO IL_M
v
23 0
ROAD .. a
0 D c x
J
Fc = J
J N W
d z Z E OGE HILL RD.
mi
c 65
OEMONT VE W
C [jR0O av -� s
61 � i W , ' AV
m
SEXTA MT AY
L F � GERVAIS AV E. QERVAIS �
G ANDVtEw
36 _ I o a. f�.
LARK 11 AVE. _ LARK
5 J
T Q C � C 11 LAURIE
oc A < O� 4 = SAPtQ
LEL N ��� 2S
z
JUNCTION A YE. N
U RKE Q AVE.
• + PVT ELORIOG
AN > AELMON T
or
KILL
Irt A M o
J HR F]
J M
t
FR ISBI E AVE.
IL
6
K�g H I SO PH IA ASE
h
I.- :5
< o
z
62 W W
dA P JE NT
30
s
Co PE A
LA RK AVE. ►=
U)
LAURIE RD x
Q � J
[ AVE. 65 o W
Z aVE. H
z
Y > X:
r--
l�
6U kKE A t �
^ PUBLIC WORKS
l > BLDG.
Q�
to
L h ti V `
t�
� W
SU R J 4 CK =
Q W �
o Z
Woka/ia /d
W W
0
G < < H
Loke Q 29
SOP 1 a` `
o = z 3 z
P R I "E ,`� GJ 49
AV
rl rl I 1
D
ST. PA U L
65
i�
J FPRI
LOCATION MAP
iQ
I
"z -J +�
+ �! •
PROPERTY LINE MAP
looldo� J24-
CLI
-tae.
f'
D. Variance - 1404 Cope Avenue (Cernohous)
Secretary Olson s aid the a 1 i c -
to bui 1 d on a PP ant � s reques ng a lot width 'var iance
substandard corner 1 ot. Staff Dance
outlined in their report.
s recommending approval as
P
. Mr. Cernohous indicate •
d he did not wi h to add to
_ the staff report,
Commissioner Prew asked if the a '
setbacks. Ppl i cant could meet the existi
Mr. Cernohous said it is his intent to construct a dwelling n
45 feet, fronting f about
ng on Cope Avenue and would main g t
on Birmingham and Cope A tarn the setbacks of 30 feet
s � p venue. The lot is level with Coe an
slopes down to the back. This would Cope, d then
type basement. p rov de for constructi of a walkout
Commissioner Prew moved the P la nni ng Comm* -
Counci a nova - - _n9 _ Comma ss i on recommend to_ th Ci
pP 1 of t he re ues ted 1 of wi dth - ��
development of an 8 b variance of 20 feet to al low.
125 f _
oot corne _ lot, o n the southwest co
Bi rm n ham Street and Co e A _..__. rner of
subject t o:
1. A grading and drainag 1 •
g P being approved by the Ci t En '
to issuance of a building permit. y g� Weer pry or
Approval is recommended on the bass •
s tha
7 . Council approved a simil variance for the property to the east.
2. The lot can support a dwe lling �
wh ch would be compatible wi
th '
et all setback requirements.
ne i ghborhood development and me exi sty ng
3. Development of the
parcel would be consistent with th
Zoning Code, e intent of the
Commissioner Fischer seconded
Ayes - al].
e�
A
A
wmnRQNniim
TO : City Manager
FROM: Director of Publ i c Works O'k
DATE: July 30, 1981
SUBJECT
Acorn Greenhouse Property
End (Dr s
t r i o a if
Red e c te
I)a to
1
F- s
The Public Works comments included in the original staff report
for this development raised objections to the sanitary sewer
service proposal. I wish to expand on a number of points so the
City Council has a full understanding of the situation.
The sanitary sewer service proposed by the developer relies on
an i nterm l i f t station. This concept is contrary to the City's
overal l sani tary sewer pl an for the area. As you may recal l ,
Hill ores t Development made a similar proposal within the last
two years. At that time the City Council supported the City's
sanitary sewer plan and required service to be extended in
conformance with the plan.
A gravity trunk sani tary sewer is the recommended method for
serving the area in question. The trunk sewer would discharge
to the south at McKnight Road just north of Maryland Avenue.
This trunk sewer would also eliminate the existing Lift Station
#1 on Larpenteur Avenue. Another objective is to eliminate the
potential overcapacity situation that exists in the Larpenteur
Avenue sewer.
The Lift Station proposed by Acorn is not needed when considered
in the context of the City's overall plan. A method for serving
the Acorn property by gravity does exi The conflict is in
timing. Acorn wants to develop now, yet City services are not
available.
The overall plan is intended to provide an adequate sanitary sewer
system for the entire City while minimizing the cost. With this
in mind, it is not in the public's best interest to depart from
the plan because the public costs are then increased. Departing
from the plan opens the door for other developers to propose
u t i l i t i e s con trary to the City's plans re in haphazard
development. This is evident from the attached letter submitted
by Hill ores t Development. Unplanned u t i l i t i e s will eventually
become the City's responsibility to straighten out at public expense.
Sanitary Sewer Lift Stations are at times necessary, but are
general avoided if possible. One of the major considerations
is the cost of construction, operation and maintenance. In the
case o f the Acorn proposal, the City would be responsible for the
future operation and maintenance costs for an undetermined number
of years. Taking into account the labor, electricity, equipment,
materials and other costs, the annual burden for operating a
small l i f t station is estimated to be $4,900.00. In view of
the expected large i ncrease in sewer charges by the Metropolitan
Waste Control Commission for lake overflows, the financial
Y J1,
i
To: Director of Public Works
KJH /mb
encl.
- 2
7 -30 -81
l i a b i l i t y of an additional l i f t station requires serious
consideration., -
I feel the City .should oppose the proposed Lift Station
due to the identifiable operation and maintenance costs
and the future public cost involved in unplanned utility
systems.
•i �r � T 4+. ���.y,if
Fi
- ,,Develop ers of
-
i �
METRO SQUARE
Downtown St. Paul
HILLCREST SHOPPING CENTER
St. Paul, Minnesota -
HONEYWELL PLANT -
` Columbia Heights. Minnesota
HENNEPIN SQUARE
Minneapolis, Minnesota
'MARKET SQUARE
`St. Paul. Minnesota
=;VIKING VILLAGE APARTMENTS
North St. Paul, Minnesota
ELM INDUSTRIAL PARK
`;Minneapolis, Minnesota
HILLCREST
DEVELOPMENT
, April 24 1981
City of Maplewood
1902 East Co. Rd. "B"
Maplewood, MN 55109
ATTENTION: Geoff Olson
Gentlemen:
EXECUTIVE AND ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
METRO SQUARE
7TH AN.D ROBERT
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Phone: 224 -5811 Area 612
We have received your April 22 questi onai re in regards to
Howard Chri stenson s proposed plat. We have no objections
wi th the following reservations:
1) Chri stenson's proposed street layout will necessitate
a revamping of our proposed platting,
'NEIDHOEFER BUILDING N0. 1 2) We wi expect and insist up on the same ty of density,
?Minneapolis, Minnesota Y
p yP ,
Y
- - 3) If uti 1 "i ties are allowed t0 o to the existi lines
555 OFFICE BUILDING - 9
at. Paul, Capitol Approach of either Larpenteur or McKnight we will expect and
insist upon the same consideration for our adjacent
`METRO PARKING RAMP - land,
i
!Downtown St. Paul
NEtDHOEFER BUILDING NO. - Thank you for advising us of the proposed development.
P P P
Minneapolis, Minnesota
-METRO PARKING LOTS
Downtown St. Paul
JNITED BINDING BUILDING
:�t. Paul., Minnesota
OODWII�. INDUSTRIES BUILDING +
_auderdale, Minnesota
`XEVELAND FABRICATING BUILDING
':M inneapolis, Minnesota - EFC kh
APITOL SQUARE
Paul, Minnesota _
. O REVI EW MALL -
LCREST LAND INVESTMENTS* -
the Development of _Commercial • i
ustrial • Residential a Apartment
• Office Projects 'n Minneapolis,.
Paul, and Suburbs: -
Sincerely,
HILLCREST DEVELOPMENT
Ernest F. Christiansen
V. P. Construction
MEMORANDUM
To! Geoff Olson, Director of Community Development -
From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Community Services t
Re:. Acorn Development
- Date: July 14, 1981
The-Park and Recreation Commission made the following motion
regarding the. Acorn Development. at their regular meeting on
July 13, 1981:
Commissioner Christianson MOVED to recommend to the Planning
Commission that we abandon our previous intention of putting
a Tot -Lot in this pa-rti cul ar plat and that we will continue
to search in the area for a feasible park site in the future;
SECONDED by Commissioner Mahre; AYES: All,
MEMORANDUM
T0: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat
LOCATION: 1530 McKnight Road _
APPLICANVOWNER: Howard P.. Chri stensen and Son, Inc.
PROJECT: Acorn Greenhouses
DATE: July 1, 1981
SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL
Request
A PUD and preliminary plat to construct 11 single - dwellings, 1 double dwelling,
and 7 quad buildings (28 units) .
Proposed Land Use
1. See the enclosed plat map for the lot and street design.
2. The existing house shown on lot 4, block 1 would be retained. The other
existing buildings wo .
3. Outl of A i s ro osed to be developed at a later date with the extension of the
p p .
stub street south of Montana Avenue.
4. The quad lots are proposed to be built on one lot, which would be owned and
maintained by a homeowners' association. The individual units would be divided
and sold as condominiums. The bedroom mix has not . been determined.
BACKGROUND
Site Description
1. Gross acreage: 15.1
2. Net acreage: 11.52
3, Existing land use: Acorn Greenhouse and two single-dwelling homes.
4. The plat contains five separate parcels of land. One- of these parcels is
.a 30 by 145.2 foot strip of land that apparently is not owned by Mr.
Christensen and is covered by a public easement. (See enclosed Property
Li ne Map)
Surrounding Land Uses
Northerly: Single - dwelling homes
Easterly: Undeveloped land owned by Hill crest Development. This land is
designated for Low and Medium Density Residential use on the Plan
Update.
Southerly: Single dwelling homes and undeveloped land. This land is designated
for Low Density Residential on the Plan Update.
Westerly: A double dwelling at 1530 McKnight Road and single dwelling homes at
1524,1514, and 1506 McKnight Road. West of McKnight Road is a golf
course in St. Paul
Past Actions
4030 -64: Council rezoned 1530 McKnight Road from R -1, Single Dwelling Residential
to R -:2, Double Dwelling.
3- 20 --71: Council approved a lot division for 1555 Myrtle Street.
7- 14 -77: Council approved a lot division creating two parcels on McKnight Road.
Deeds have not been recorded for the two lots,
6 -5 -80: Council tabled a Plan amendment for this property from RL to Rm, until
the Comprehensive Plan Update is completed. This proposal was for 19 s i ngl e-
dwel l i ng ' homes, 6 double-dwellings, and 7 fourpl exes .
3- 19 -81: Council approved a Plan amendment from RL, Residential Lower Density to
RLE, Residential Lower Density Extended,
6= 15 -81: The Planning Commission recommended denial of a previous plan for 15
single-dwellings, 6 double-dwellings, and 4 quad buildings (16 units) .
DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
Planning
1. Plan designation: RLE
2. The RLE classification is defined as follows (pp. 143 -144):
Classification for residential use allows for more concentrated densities
of population within - defined parts of a given development area while maintai ni ng
an average population density of 14 people per net residential acre within the
entire area being considered. The maximum density of any segment of the
development shall be approved by the City Council, based on the area of
natural features to be preserved and the quality of site and building design.
This classification is primarily designed to allow for the controlled use of
low density apartment and /or townhouse type units, with the appl icati ;on and
approval of such development being subject to meeting all of the following
conditions:
a. Where it is necessary to cluster units in order to preserve valuable
natural features, such as woodlots, wetlands, or areas of unusual topo-
graphy or natural features, and
b. Where the overall density of the total development will not exceed 14
people per net acre, and -
c. Where such development is part of a Planned Unit Development, and
2
d. Provided that such units are of a scale, design and location that is
compatible with single family homes, located in any adjacent RL area.
3. One of the housing objectives of the Comprehensive Plan is to encourage and
plan for a wide variety of housing types (p. 46).
4. The Plan further suggests the following
housing mix:
No. of
Percent of
D w e l l i n g Units
To to 1
at Complete
Ho.usi ng
4 -1 -80
-Development
,Units
Estimates
Maximum
Multiple - Family Dwelling Units
4,
17%
21
Maximum
Townhouse Dwelling Units
5,100
20%
4/
.Maximum
Mobile -Home Dwelling Units
700
3/
5%
Minimum
Single-Family Dwelling Units
15
50
70 /
25
100%
100/
5. Since 1978, the City has approved or is considering plans for an additional
392 townhouse -quad units within one m i l e of the site and another 132 units
south of Mai 1 and Road. This will still leave the City far short of the 20/
maximum townhouse units.
6. The proposed density ft- 13.0 people /net acre (based on all two - bedroom quad
units).
7. Zoning: R -1, Residence District (single dwelling)
Environmental Considerations
1. The site has rolling topography with several small wetlands. The major tree
cover is on the west and southeast parts of the site.
2. The site plan would preserve a large knoll and woodl of adjacent to the pond
in the southeast corner of the site.
Public Works
1. There is a sanitary sewer in McKnight Road that could serve 2 - 4 of the lots
closest to McKnight Road. This sewer is too high to serve the.-rest of the
site. The developer is proposing a l i f t station as a temporary solution to this
.problem. A lift station would be contrary to the Sanitary Sewer Plan, .which
proposes gravity service to this area. One of the goals of the Sanitary Sewer
P
Plan i's to eliminate l i f t stations where possible, because of their high
maintenance, operation, and energy costs. A gravity sanitary sewer project
was proposed for this area last year (Hillcrest Development project) . The
project did not move ahead, because of financing problems with Hill crest
Development.
2. Water service is available on Myrtle Street, However, long deadends (over
2000 feet) result. This can cause taste and odor probl ems as well as reduce
the fire flow available. A feasibility study has been prepared on putting water
in McKnight Road. This would loop the water in Acorn development and resolve
the above problems.
3
3. McKnight Road is proposed to be upgraded and widened. Construction is
scheduled for 1982. The County has requested 66 feet of right -of -way from
the centerline of McKnight Road. This dedication would not reduce the
number of lots proposed,
4. -Myrtle Street is proposed to be included in a future overlay program.. This
would not result in an assessment to abutting homeowners. No _other improve-
ment is planned.
50 A three acre -foot storm water holding pond and piping are proposed in the City
Drainage Plan for the pond in the southeast corner of the site.
Park Considerations
1. The Maplewood Park and Open Space Study and the Plan Update propose a 1% to
2 acre totl of in this area.
2. The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the previous Acorn Greenhouse
development on June 8 and recomended that a totl of be acquired on the south -
east corner of proposed Acorn Court and Montana Avenue.
Other Agencies
The Soil Conservation Service recommends that, "An. erosion control plan for the
period during and after construction should be submitted before work begins and
some guarantee that the plan will be followed should be obtained.
Citizen Comments
Staff surveyed the property owners within 200 feet of the site. Of the 15 replies,
7 had no objection, one had no comment, and 7 had objections. Objections were
as fol lows:
1. Cannot afford to be assessed for area water improvements
2. Increased traffic on Myrtle Street
3. Object to being assessed for the upgrading of Myrtle Street
4. Devaluation of property
5. Prefer single -dwel l i n g homes on large lots.
6. Density too high
7. See the three enclosed letters.
CONCLUSION
Alternatives
1. Table the PUD and preliminary plat until gravity sewer is available to the site.
2. Approve a preliminary plat for the 2 - 4 lots closest to McKnight Road, subject
to the following conditions:
4
a. Provision of a signed developers agreement for the construction of Montana
Avenue to the east l i n e of the easterly -most platted lot.
b. The balance of the property shall be designated as an outl of and remain
undeveloped until gravity sewer is available.
c. The number of lots to be platted shall be determined by tine Director of
Public Works, depending on thee building 'elevations and abi 1 i ty to serve
these lots from the McKnight Road sewer. -
3. Approval of the PUD and preliminary plat, including the l i f t station proposal,
with - the following conditions:
a. Designate the common land around the quads as outl of B. The quad associ-
ation's by-laws and declaration must be approved by the City Attorney to
assure maintenance of the property.
b. Designate the stub street south of Montana Avenue as Currie Street.
c. The 10 foot utility easements adjacent to the public rights -of -way
serve no purpose and should be omitted.
d. An additional 16.5 feet of right -of -way for McKnight Road should be provided
in addition to that shown on the plat.
e. A blanket public easement over Outlot B should be provided for utility
and drainage installation and maintenance.
f. Approval of the final grading and drainage plans by the Director of Public
Works .
g. Provision of a signed developer's agreement for the construction of pro-
posed public improvements,
Analysi s
This plat is premature, pending sanitary sewer extension to this area. Staff
would normally recommend approval of this plat, subject to Council ordering the
appropriate public improvement project. In this case, the project was ordered and
discontinued as a result of financial difficulties with Hill crest Development.
It does not appear that this project will be constructed in the near future.
Approving the preliminary plat, subject to the construction of sanitary sewer,
may result in years of 90 -day time extensions. Tabling the plat avoids these
time extensions and gives the Park and Recreation Commission time to negotiate
with the developer for a mini-park, Denying the plat would indicate a denial of
the site design. Staff approves of the site design and feels that it complies
with the intent of the RLE designation on the Land Use Plan. Staff has no
_objection to Alternative 2-= platting the westerly 2 - 4 lots. The developer
has stated, however, that this alternative would not resolve the financial
- p rob 1 ems of the property owner.
The main reason the developers are requesting premature development is that a
bank is planning to foreclose- on -the property. This is an unfortunate situation for
the property owner, but personal financial hardship should not be a basis for
deviating from past policy and incurring the public expense of maintaining a
temporary l i f t station.
5
Recommendation
Table the PUD and preliminary plat until gravity sewer is available to this site,
on the basis that:
1. The development is premature, pending extension of gravity sanitary sewer
to this area.
2. The intent of the City Sanitary Sewer Plan is to eliminate existing and
avoid future l i f t stations, because of their high cost in energy, maintenance,
and operation,
Enclosures .
1. Location Map
2. Property Line Map
3. Preliminary Plat
4. Letter from Mary and Jim Zierhut
5. Letter from Marvin and Sherrie Matthews
6. Letter from James Mueller
6
NORTH ST PAUL
6 8
8
*HOLLOW AY AVE.
• ' �'.�
Zit
IF
LJIPLEY I AVE.
49
LARPENT EV V AN
. i
O
Z
0
Z
M
O
a.
MA
4c
ERAN
.� 4
G .
"Now
1. LOCATION MAP
4
Ei
rc
7 _ t
... V.
' 1
8 .. s
-
..� 3 .5v,r Htv 5ct.1 ;g -
q!). c
a Q
1540 >—
���! 020 �c. � �� �' � •s1
� I 2 CQ 7G 29 7C
1
M
V 34 U All 1530 -15
ale L 2 00
1.53
1530
GREENHOUSE
�6
I A 1 -
• Ad
�- • .15'4 �- OWNE RSHIP UNCLEAR
.r 1514
�—
Oz .•. C =ic..� 4
ca
f -
1506 f
caj
14
i-
14 : ° •� tyS�N
MN
1
•
• At�t�ER`�N
4 '
1 '
2. PROPERTY LINE MAP
4
N
PRELIMINARY _PLAT OF:
. ACORN . GREENHOUSES
� tt�
i
... w $F / 0 Joe OW
'' ire ( / N• "' 1 r. -) '� F
as
solid's
F �.fa
Eyu US
,
14
$
M •`
iW •�
I 1
100 i
I
f l ,
+ eF I IIdlN/ so a r t
..._ J 1 . ', a •A't'i/ ;pie. � ,
ter.— - -� . • ', - /e I.S1f..ir :!J . 'i —=I
e "t► . �. ..++�' - 0* Ji �liA1�1'...�•1 T'� ' �f1i -
iv00
...••ter ?.�.. — ._ ......•�..�...1�.�.,r��r1► t
— — roa
FIX
'�F""' ■ • •, ma y___. n
t
11 ,
Y
` ♦ 1
♦ 1 • 1
1� ♦ 1
•
few
M I 1 , / /.`r /+t,�el � ' • I I r' J tt
AM ; w �►Aew 91 ylrlw.w set/ttte 1 30 /RONt. 9I11110P
tP '� 111
'tI'CA JMtf•• l��N \
O of — Doodle Drollta�
1 00 - Owed Dvellleg
0 0,
+ `` —•� �� v /`, TOP of Msnhsls
Slipped I r - /�"�• INr. of MoWA�Ig
�—` fq!>* �.•/ 0944? 1 P. Chfloteo@ae t •es. Was.
' •
1530 McNeight Rd.
V 0 Maplewood Mo.
w I O , _... -_._� / ( dross Areal 1 3. l AS.
Ile Net Arm I 11.11Ae.
►alert
1
I
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The Sam" on of the Smash, 1/1 of *a ft ea-so q - bu of,th@ onf*"
M tr seeeeeat Hens the "veld@/ " toot M am me a ratio hlfMrefo
owaets" ebt vote of too asothom" orareer of eM Merthremt pmrtmr
I
low
J -7
$ aJ», 1.r.
t qoi~ of /votive !d, twra.l IM no stets. 11. 9OSeet
t aoollss ft. 'Nralddv le Meath. I I It coat. dossrlhtld
Of Nthra/ MgIwn /M at • pint /e W some 'too of M 'd Nestle" VI to " toot Meth of "I'm o"thnaot mormea mf seta Mtheoot
peawa et the M►rlhrael am"W@ thmmsa aerlh •tong Said aeatlom vine 111.71 hall t11oeN Mat pfellel to we Neflh time of rY
somorsst "meter of the emrthomst Tmertmr 171 rmee@ these Nor" prmllel with the Meat llme of said emotion 11.11 feet@ tllaesa
Ile to mho ptet of levtmm"01
of ,: aca)t that Wert Of the North 1/2 of the soothtt otter of the Northwest tlraftet of section 10.
Tw ee
h /P T1. Roots It In anal covotl. Nlnnetoto Ng /sa tr ag at the Northeast earner thereof. theme•
ere rest a distance of 1t�.10 feat to the Waint s/ We�fmal h
ag of thle descrfltioa: thence doe Sorth
Ito feet to a Polat. thence des Nest too het to @ N nt thane• doe North Ile et to a Point, themes
dot cost 100 feet to the Point of t@gimalag of this deseripthala "d also @least the Nast 141.07 loot
of the North sit of the North 1/1 of the Soothwalt toertor of the Northwest arartor of Section 14.
Towashlj to Neap tt. rhteh 11os South of a stn@ drawn Parallel to the North tine of laid Southwest
Tr[rter of the Ne►tlwost twrtor free a Point 164.16 feet Seeth, as measured along the rest life of
laid Sorthwest trartar of Northeast gsortor from the N@rthwelt armor of Said Ssrthwest Tre►ter of
Northwest grertar.
The Nest 1/ of the swth 1/1 of Who North 1// of the
5601 @et 134 or the Northwest 1/4 or taatlen 11, '
l6~11110 19, Prop 11.
This heat 143.2 feet of the Mast % of the swot! ig of the •
owth It of the wmthwoot • of the owthroot t, soetim
11. iswwoh!! te. Nawge 11. eMOpt 1e" Ita@tll too toot thetNl.
KEY MAP
u
1.. 1 l • 1
DATE OF PREPARATIONS 4/1519 1
F,
!
�1
/3
0 eo
VOo/AR- x�._.. /.LGtc >.-- _ - --- --
O
d /
1�9 - GZ'�u�le�•Jxo -rte _ _ rrxnc clv i��� _<< -r.��
t
a
. t-J/49
May 10 , 1981
Mr. Geoff Olson, Director
Office of Community Development
1902 East County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Dear Mr. Olson:
_After perusing the preliminary plat proposed by the Christ#.asens;.I have
the following concerns:
1. hots 109 11 129 13, which are designated for quad homes are on a pare el
of land that should be left untouched due to the existing large hill.
We must pay careful attention if the developer proposes leveling of this
or any other area. The layout of the land is supposed to be conserved.
2. Using the net area of 12.2 acres and 14 people per acre maxJmaum,would
mean 1 70 people. The proposed 42 families is very near that maximum.
3. The elimination of the dead end on Myrtle will cause a large increase
in traffic flow. The reasons are: a) 30 additional families using
Myrtle as their east to bypass the bottleneck at the McKnight- Larpentuer
intersection. b) Also traffic coming north on Mcgni6ht may use this as a
bypass of. the McKnight- Larpentuer intersection. c) men and if Hillcrest
completes their development, a major portion of the traffic Will use
Myrtle and Sterling as their method of caress.
The increase in traffic during and after construction might necessitate
upgrading Myrtle street. The council has stated that this upgrade has to
include the installation of storm sewers and gutters.along With new asphalt.
The assessments for this will average $10-12DOO per lot. A very large
concern.
5. Utilities. Will the Water hookup affect pressure positively or negatively
• to those on Myrtle street? The seer cannot be hooked up directly to
Myrtle street, so Where will it SoY Due to the layout of the land, if it
should go directly West to McKnight, a pmaping station would have to be
incorporated into the plat. Is there any possiblity if this happens, that
assessments can be levied?
6. Due to the fact that maul.tiple dewellings are being proposed, rental property
is being created. The possibility of absentee landlords exists. The caliber
of people who rent is sometimes lower than those that own their own homae.
I would like to make it clear that we are not opposed to the development of
the land. However, we do not see any reason to include multiple dwellings in the
plat. It is not in the best interest of the city of Maplewood due to the rental
problems. Secondly, if myrtle street were left as a dead end, most concerns would
be e3.iminated.
Ce , ly,
Marviz L. and Sherrie J. Matthews
1592 Myrtle Street
Maplewood, Minnesota S5119
CITY OF
V dW J
dff
01 MAPLEWOOD
1902 EAST COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109
• s
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 770_4560 .
g+
April 22, 1981
James and Frances Mueller
. 1568 Myrtle
Maplewood, Minnesota 55119
Dear Mapl ewood Resident:
The City of Maplewood has received an application for a plat and
=p1 anned unit development to construct 14 single-dwellings, 6 doubl e-
dwel 1 i ngs (12 units) , and 4 quad buildings (16 units at 1530 N. McKnight
ht 9
Road (see enclosed map) . The applicant. is Howard Christenson.
Hearings on this project-.have not been scheduled yet. This letter
is to ask your opinion; before a formal recommendation is made by the
CI t y Staff for a public hearing. You w i l l receive an official notice
when the hearing is scheduled.
Please answer the questions below. and return this form to me in the
enclosed postage paid envelope by Ma y 11, 1981. If you would like further
information, please call me at 770 -4560, between 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 PAD
Thank you for your comments. They will be given careful consideration.
Very truly yours,
A le- 7L./
Geoff Olson, Director
I have no objections to this proposal
I have the following objections to this ro os al .
P P _
Wg$ zz_ ,U
- 4F I r
/0
Ar
E .
/ 2 3
1
ALI
..G�tA -CLi � 7tF -CdLnV
o� GRt, OtGUC.eo�7�,vl•,,f, • . -,
/{fJfi CLI.Z Lfi��.GClnJ 4414 2�O1�0 r ,y�Q�ffygJ UKUf'.00.
Au
x"e
% 4000,
- zoo
rl t4
\I��Ac� -�, t m���x..
4' )lo lfc.�f�f.�i�7/ CacOc�L — 16o")
q7,9
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager*
FROM: Assistant City Engineer
DATE: July 29, 1981
SUBJECT: Ripley Avenue (from Edgerton Street
to West)
Watermain Improvement
Project No. 80 -3
Bids Received
The bids for the above referenced project will be received
on August 4, 1981. The bid tabulations, therefore, will
not be available for distribution into the Councils packet.
We will. be tabulating the bids and making our recommendation
on the award of contract and submitting that report at the
August 6, 1981 Council Meeting.
The schedule was so set, to accommodate an August construction
start -up.
DJP /mn
,.l
2 e L ..
Da u L
G.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
F ROM :
DATE:
e4 T'i T1 T T /9 m
City Manager
Assistant City Engineer
July 29, 1981
Keller.Parkway
Sanitary Sewer Improvement
Project No. 80 -14
Bids Received
In accordance with a previously submitted schedule, the
bids for the above referenced project will be opened on
August 5, 1981. The bid tabulations will not be available
prior to the August 6, 1981 Council Meeting but will be
distributed at that meeting.
The scheduling of the advertising and bid analysis was
set to allow for adequate time for installation within
this years construction season*
A cti on by 0oun- oi ;
DJP /mn
Erf c
. L. ;-i
'� 4_ _._ ........ ��
S
T0:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
_ APPL.ICANT /OWNER:
PROJECT:
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
City Manager'
Director of Community Development
Preliminary. Plat
Southeast Corner of County Road C and Kel Parkway
Rodol fo Gonzalez
Gonzalez Addition
July 23, 1981
SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL
Proposed Land Use
1. Five parcels for development as single - fami dwellings
2 Refer to the enclosed plat for lot design.
3. Proposed l three is developed with the appl house.
BACKGROUND
A
Action by Council$
Endorsed
Re ne IIodi� i ed __.__..�......
ReJ ecte
Approval of a prel i mi nary plat for .five lots, Dat -
Site Description
1. Gross and net acreage: 1.87
2, Existing land use: A single-family dwelling with attached garage and accessory
buildings.
Surrounding Land Uses
Northerly: County Road C and single - fami homes
Southerly: Two single-fami dwellings
Easterly: Bever Brothers Landscaping plant storage yard
Westerly: Keller Parkway and Gervai s Lake
Past Action
7 -5 -73: Council approved a lot split for the applicant's property, which created
the 90 by 247 foot parcel referred to as "Exception" on the plat.
w
f
8- 21 -80: Council tabled a similar preliminary plat at the request of the developer.
(See enclosed minutes and previous plat map.) The developer wanted to straighten
the jog! between lots 1 and 3, and omit the proposed rights -of -way dedication
Planning Considerations
Land Use .P1 an designation: RL, Residential Lower Density
2. this Land Use Plan designation allows for a maximum density of 14 persons per
- :net acre. With a total area of 1.87 acres, the applicant is proposing a
density of 6.4 people /acre .
3. Zoning: R -1, Residence District (Single Dwelling)
4. The lots meet or exceed City Code requirements.
Environmental Considerations
1. The rear portions of proposed lots four and five are low land and are subject
to ponding.
2. Proposed lots one and two are at a grade elevation ranging from 6 to 12 feet
above County Road C, and the slope to the street is steep. The applicant is
proposing to do some excavating along this slope and place the fill in the low
areas of lots four and five.
3. Much of the site is wooded. with mature trees.
4. The proximity of the site to Kohlman and Gervai s Lakes make erosion control
during construction essential. The steep banks of the site adjacent to Keller
Parkway and County Road C make the job more difficult.
Public Works Considerations
1. Sanitary sewer is available from County Road C
2. Water is not available.
3. The Drainage Plan for Maplewood shows a two acre -foot holding pond along the
easterly side of the property. This pond is to outlet under County Road C
to Kohlman Lake. (See enclosed drainage plan.)
4. It appears that portions of the northwest corner of the plat drain over Keller
Parkway into Gervai s Lake.
Public Safety Considerations
Public water mains with hydrants should be extended to this area for fire
suppression.
Citizen Conment
A survey was sent to owners of the 14 properties within 200 feet of the site. Of
the six who replied, two had objections to the plat. The other four had the
following concerns with this subdivision:
l . The south portions of lots 4 and 5 are directly behind our lot and at present
are a low area and more or less a swamp and holding pond area. We would be
against any negative aspects . of losing this capacity.
2. The size of lots 1 and 2 and the widths of 4 and 5 are such that might pre-
clude building houses of appropriate size and quality for the neighborhood.
I would think 1 and 2 and 4 and 5 should be separated building_ sites.
30 We own 15 feet of Lake Gervai s _Shoreline adjacent to Gonzalez gowned 15 feet,
If -lake access 'I's given with these lots, five families using such a small area
would not seem practical and would certainly harm our property and use of
the lake. Access should be confined to one lot and family.
4, I think that he is trying to make too many lots out of the available land. I
am moving so it won't really matter to me, but I don't think it would raise
the value of the surrounding property and might very likely lower it. Also,
I think he would have difficulty selling the lots because of their undesir-
able shape.
5. For this location with the terrain and trees being what they are, we would
prefer to see Lots 1 and 2 combined into a single building site and the north
property l i n e of Lot 3 without the jog in it. That property should not be
.spoiled by cutting it up into weird shapes, causing problems when it is desired
to add on to the house, bui 1 d a garage, i nstal l a swimming pool , or make
other such improvements,
Considerations from Other Agencies
The Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District has approved this preliminary plat.
They have stated that:
Development within this area may required a Watershed District permit.
Prior to any grading operations a District permit may be required. The
Board is particularly concerned about the affect filling lots 4 and 5,
which appear to be low, would have on downstream areas,
Recommendation
Approval of the Gonzalez Addition preliminary plat, with the following conditions:
1. Payment of deferred assessments of $1,312-50 for sanitary sewer and $630.15
for street improvements on County Road C.
2. An erosion control and grading plan shall be prepared with the advice of the
Soil Conservation Service, and submitted for Staff approval,, prior to final
plat approval.
Enclosed:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line Map
3. Preliminary Plat
4. Maplewood Drainage Plan Map T
5. Preliminary Plat Presented to Council on 8 -21 -80
6. Council minutes of 8 -21 -80
7. Planning Commission Minutes of 7 -21 -80
3
,m
�9 VAONAIS HEIGHTS 61 i
e
�i.. .. ..
d
V
0* J �:
� J
EAM AVE.
•`, — .qtr •—•- .: -•••. •.,r. �. �•.'••
22
. _• �' �, �� o Koh /�nan "`"`" /
CC envois '�' -- -� � °
Lake Loke
4 KOHLMAN `
w
r.w
o ... 23
d COUNTY ROAD
V
W
d z z
U
J
. 22
61
Q
60
LF 1 GERVAIS AVE.
CO. RQ-
36
N
OPE I
Kelle
{..• �• LARK AVE.
0 25 -
W < Lake COUN
�c O
LELAN C] 2
r
e 25 W o
JUNC TION AVE .
v
u N sURKE AV, � ~
N U RKE
)RID ELDRIDGE AV. A►j ` H ELDR
b
'LA. $ELMOt1►T pK ELI
� r
,A VIE , ._J 58 . v = s vE SKILI
W D LA. ? H �----
J �
o < o a Y IL
CA ON AVE W I s r�w E
F
G:
P T ELTtOHER Rodol fo Gonzalez
it
ti
i1
REQUEST Preliminary Plat
t '
3
1. Location Map
a
L FETITIONER Rodolfo Gonzalez
REQUEST Preliminary Plat
Property Line Map
4
a
lot
A '" v,
i
v �
w
C.o u-NYY KVA D G
yW [...s• NW Jew • �f /spa -G. r Sa ..: ��+y J.r..rri (� G,t= �: -+ •�
O r e ^
/H► Ifi ws if /✓�/y If Stt�ilP �' � ZZ l�
� F
I
t E
loo' 79 79'
Af ,M►
O �
Z
v L / 1 �•t 1 y+� '
N 4
3e
C.
lei
Z + W AW
w ' 28�1oa`
y
f?' 21x7
fog. fi l: nc e� �Viir �/ • .� IA7 �*
PRELIMINARY PLAT
GONZALEZ ADDITION
Q
N
Q
a
RO DO L FO GO N ZA L E Z
PETITIONER
PLAT
REQUEST
MAPLEWOOD DRAINAGE PLAN
t
4
Ap- Z
i
V% _
yV s....• a►vdI Z tpgv AW vt•atc -/ S.,_:JO - 4v Ss..r.. Q Ql:�-'+
f
« r 1
E E t E E - -_ ''
4 3Sl'ti �
w '
J
2
mi s' s 7 . 7 1 2 .
/jar,
le, Ao, Zoo Sj .F f
i
N e
A' t
le
i " v
4 t i
l � f
� � ► _ � � w � t 1 E
o
23,500 So�{. t �
,v , _ 4J � 23a s
.s' Zy7
c
� F '
ZV7 - sa' _ tea
utiLiaf�S. _
( o n "vect to existing utilities in County Ad. C
and Mel►er Parksay.
No water mains in area - use sells
70P0(Jt"P : NOW taken, no new roads
ROADS: No new roads Planned tot 1 :0,x40 sq. ft., mt
Lot 3 = 10,5,00 sq. rt . , mvi DRAINAGE EASEMENT
Dedicate extra 16.5 feet for Keller Parkway to? 3 - 23.500 sq. ft... �;
Dedicate extra 10.0 feet for Count), 00" C Lot w 1d.400 sq . ft.. m l
),:Mitt" to, NQUIRtllNTS: tot S 1!.000 sq. ft.. ac
avt:ago •idth of Lots = 75 feet
Mir -saxm area = 10,000 Sq. it.
O ront se tback s 30 feet
Side tot setback : 15 feet
6"* 10t setback : not given in ordinance
.
forL I N IOU ?i hnT
G ON Z AL E Z A")YIIW
Co to F?&Fjkwol, toW.VY t6, wi 4 raw&
` �Uv•ZC1 � - Z
4
a
2.� Preliminary Plat - Gonzalez Addition - 7 :45 P.M.
/Awl
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request
of Mr. Rodolfo Gonzalez, 2626 Keller Parkway, to subdivide the property into 5
dwelling lots. The Clerk noted the dates of publication and stated the hearing
notice was found to be in order.
b. Manager Evans presented the staff report with the following recommendation:
• I. Approval of the Gonzales Addition preliminary plat, with the following con
di tions :
_ 1. The Applicant shall dedicate a ponding easement to the City for a portion
of the two acre foot holding pond, the location to be determined by the
City Engineer.
2. Payment of deferred assessments of $1312.50 for sanitary sewer and $630.15
for,street improvements on County Road C.
3. An erosion control and grading plan shall be prepared with the advice of
the Soil Conservation Service, and submitted for staff approval prior to
final plat approval.
II. Approval of variances of lot width for parcel one based on the finding that
the variance is caused by the dedication of additional right -of -way which the
County will be reducing in its proposed street plan.
c. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation:
"Commissioner Sletten moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council
approval of the Gonzalez Addition preliminary plat, with the following conditions:
1. The holding pond to be as determined by the City Engineer.
Lots 1 and 2 to be combined into one lot.
2. Payment of deferred assessments of $1312.50 for sanitary sewer and $ 630.15
for street improvements on County Road C.
3. An erosion control and grading plan shall be prepared with the advice of
the Soil Conservation Service, and submitted for staff approval prior to
final plat approval.
Commissioner Howard seconded.
Commissioner Fischer moved an amendment to strike the requirement for merging
-of lots 1 and 2 into one lot and leave them as two separate lots as originally
submitted.
Commissioner Pellish seconded. Ayes 8
Nays 2 (Commissioner Howard and Whitcomb)
Voting on the motion as amended: Ayes 9
Nays 1 (Commissioner Howard)"
d. Mr. Gonzalez, the applicant, explained his request.
e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. The following were heard:
Mr. Philip Clyde.
f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard.
g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
h. Councilman Anderson moved to table this matter until November 6, 1980 for
further investigation.
t ,_ ___ A....O. •*1 1
'
E. Preliminary Plat - Gonzalez Addition
Secretary Olson said the applicant is r equestin g a p p roval of a fiv
9 PP e
lot subdivision. Staff is recommending approval of the request as outlined
in their report.
Rudy Gonzalez, owner of the property., said he was not awa -re of
. the proposed
_ -
ponds ng area. He "said once the County vacates a portion of-the right-of-wa
9 Y
....for both Ke.l 1 er Parkway. and County Road C the lots w i l l be a,11'. in excess of
`.0,000
j
square feet. During the grading e property, the
9 9 9 of the P ro pry, _ywilltryto
-save most of the natural vegetation. Some,_ of caurse, will be lost
Commissioner S letten moved the Planning Commission recommend to the
_ City Council approval of the Gon Addition preliminary plat, wi th
s
th e follo conditions:
1. The . ho l di n g pond to be - as de termi ned by. the Ci ty Eng 9 i veer.
Lots 1 and 2 to be combined into one lot. `
2. Payment of deferred assessments of $1312.50 for sanitary sewer and
$630.15 for street improvements on Count Road C
Y
. n
f�
30- An erosion control and grading plan shall-be prepared with the advice
of the Soil Conservation Service, and submitted for Staff approval
{{
prior to final plat approval.
�j
Commissioner-Howard seconded
F
The Conini discussed the combi ni ng - of the - two lots to make one
larger l ot,
C �
Commissioners Fischer and Pel 1 i sh indicated they were not i n favor
_ {
of requiring the combination of the two lots. . The neighborhood is
nei 9
developed, to larger lots, therefore, this plat would not make the
f
neighborhood exceed-the density planned for that neighborhood.
I
Commissioner Fi -scher m an amend to s th r e Q Ui rement for
M Ing of lot 1 and 2 . i nto one lot and leave them a s t separa
lots as on gi nal ly s
Commissioner- Pel l.i sh seconded Ayes - 8
Nays - 2 (Commissioner Howard and
Whitcomb)
. Commissioner Prew suggested using a diagonal lot Ii ne between
Lots 1 and 3 rather-than the 10 foot offset.
.Voting on the motion as amended: Ayes -
Nays - 1 (Com.issioner Howard)
S 7 -21 -80
A
MEMORANDUM by � Cwancil:
Endorsed
kodif
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development R e. i
SUBJECT: Plan Amendment Date
LOCATION: Woodlynn Avenue and McKnight Road (See enclosed map)
APPLICANT: Mack Nettleton
OWNERS: Mack Nettleton, Jerrold Li ndahl , and Geraldine Nordgren
DATE: July, 29, 1981
SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL
Re quest
Amend the land use plan for a 7.67 acre parcel from RL, residential lower
density to RM, residential medium density.
Proposed Land Use
The applicant intends to build townhouses.
BACKGROUND
Site Description
1. Acreage: 7.67 acres
2. Existing Land Use:
Surrounding Land Uses
Undeveloped, except for NSP high power lines
Northerly: Undeveloped property planned for Rm, medium density residential and
zoned for F, farm residential
Southerly: Woodlynn Avenue, Across Woodlynn Avenue are single dwelling houses and
undeveloped s i'ngl a dwell i na lots,
Easterly: McKnight Road. East of McKnight Road is undeveloped land planned for
Rm and zoned R -1, single-dwelling residential
Westerly: Undeveloped property planned for Rm and zoned F
Past Action
11- 28 -80: The City of Maplewood approved a l division, dividing the site into
three parcels, subject to paying all unpaid taxes and assessments. The
applicant has not recorded the new
4- 20 -81: The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed zone change.
At the time of their review, however, it was believed that the subject land was
planned for Rm, which would permit the .townhouses.
5 -7 -81: Council tabled the rezoning until the Plan Update is completed.
6 -4 -81: Council set a hearing for this case for July 16.
7- 16 -81: Council rezoned the property to R -3, multiple dwellings.
DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
Planning
1. Current Plan and Plan Update designation: RL, residential lower density
2. The RM, residential medium density classification provides for an average
population density not to exceed 22 people per net residential acre.
This density is designed to represent those areas of the community
intended for such housing types as single family detached houses on small
lots, duplex houses, single family row houses (town houses) , low
density apartments wi th low land coverage, and mobile homes
3. If the site were developed with half two - bedroom and half three- bedroom town-
houses, 29 units could be built at low density and 46 units at medium
dens i ty _
4. One of the housing goal objectives in the Comprehensive Plan states that:
" The Village should encourage and plan for a wide variety of housing types
by B. Providing a choice of ownership, type and location of housing"
(p.46)
5. Zoning: R -3, multiple dwellings
6. Section 906.400(b) of City Code states that, "The density s h a l l not exceed
the maximum density permitted by the land use classification and people per
unit designated in the City's adopted Comprehens ve Plan"
Public works
Sanitary sever and water are available.
Pi nn nr i a l
There are unpaid assessments and taxes on this property. If they are not
paid up in August, the property will go tax delinquent.
Other Agencies
The NSP easement, which covers the north 150 feet of the site, cannot be built
upon.
CONCLUSION
Analysis
The decision as to whether the property should be developed with single-dwelling
homes or multiple- dwellings was made when Council approved a rezoning to R -3
on July 16. The issue now is whether to allow the townhouses to be built at
- 2 -
low or medium density.
The advantage of approving the amendment is an increase in townhouse units avail-
able. The disadvantages of approving the amendment . are: 1. increased
traffic 2. Increase in drive openings onto Woodlynn Avenue
Recommendation
Approval of the Plan amendment, on the basis that:
1. Woodlynn Avenue is designated as a major collector street and has the
capacity to handle the increased traffic.
2. Additional townhouses would be available to homebuyers , increasing the
variety of housing choices available.
3. Properties to the north and west are planned for medium density
residential .
Enclosed:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line map
3. Current Land Use Plan
4.. Plan Update Proposal
5. Applicant's Letter
- 3 -
� (1) N. LAKEWOOD OR. t *vn •...
(2) N. MWYER CT. 36131 Q Z
(3) 8 EN 000 CURVE R22W 6 R21W i 0
(4) E. BRENNER AVE 1 }.
tS) N CHIPPEWA CT. T2DN W
WHITE BE AR LAKE c6) N. 9ARTELMY u. U ? "
8 ( 7) N. MARY CT. _
19
R R Mo" _ ... :7��'j ... . I L�
r
t
W L
woo y • AV
4) (4)
W(0 U)
FURNESS �c C3) t2) (6) T)
CT. LY A S) :AVE.
d A 4 C •••
0 F. W
tO !,
RID O
STAND .i
12 t3) (�
MAPLE LANE
Si /v e
AVE LA " •'•• ••
•••
Lake
MAP 1 W
1 -- 70
RA AT :;:�::::•:•:•:: (1.1 MAPLE LANE
68
(2 .) CHI PPE WA CIRCLE
(3.) CHIPPEWA AVE.
W NORTH ST. PAUL
t W
W KOHLMAN AVE.
a 23
E OGEHILL 110.
`
65
oc `�
AVE. _
O = '
• vs or —
A � 111h AVE,
AV
, t I
YAI + AV I
c•.v r. i.>, f>
1 36 r .
ASTLE A
R EN AVE.
OPE AVE. `
-- I
�►RK AVE. t~ H
ac
A `
URIE RO � {
vE. � 65 N � .
64 25
i
LOCATION MAP
..........
Azo boo
0
.14
110
rm SOAL
13
1A
APPROVED LOT SPLIT S 11-28-80
am_ta. qm� moo w- �WA�
-, -_ !" -
ri Awl
ol
Ire
71
I A I n n M
A-0
klo, 110 #ta z o 1040 EP
see
ASIMAL
t
17
7
0
o
7U
AC
lk
3 oic? = y -'). ,.. • - _ I � � ��
q
PROPERTY LINE MAP
m I q t
1 1.4
L C
R
cl ty of
erchan
4
ma Hear Lak
I%T
I.
ITYV 4431)
44
CD
� r .
Alf
�. C
Immoll
� � a
t;� 1
. I
Mon :Fv
0
mapiewooa Haig
lGH60Ras0flD LAND i
APPROVED, October 9, 1972
Mn Pl MAIr)r)r) of ANINITIW%
IJ
cl
c
FC
c
'� iii
unm
I ;
�i
c
ollector
OWN
014
ILL .
fAW
`x
;.
�: �r� � �
.;r • y��' � . ' � �
't � . �'
,�
;;� r ., r . ,...J '
. �� r
1 , ( r
�' ��ll
.;
�,�
,ti
�•t�
1tt
.11'T1i� 1t ;'■
■ �' 1
,:
+�
i,
/, _ _
� - -- — — - ...r e
� - s rw . - ....... ,. ,,..�.r..rr .r�
' /•kw — -- —
�� ■■ra �
■■� ■■ ��II/N �- ■ ■
,�
t� ■
��� r '�"" ti : �.c.•. fir+ �� 1
�,
�� 1 1 1 1
l� �.,{ ■
.V
.�• i .�1 �• �%�
�` 1
i�. -
' ��
yj
�,
r:.'
�� � . �
,: � r ��
.,
-r��
■,�■i ■■ ■••�••••
�R
���
� � f
.•
.
1 �
�' ... ,
i�
��
r. /
" %�.
+ - „ %//
1 � 'iJ• I.r
i � ���'�)
1 �
._ .... /�
1 � . �
' .
;� ,.� *,, � x.�
V F •�
I .F
ti �' � � +...u,.r,� r.� t A
� •, •
�Ftif�; yt
.� :>>>f
'' 1
� , ,
�-
' •, , -
� ��� ��
.� ,..� ,,
_ 1
_�.
��
1'�
'IIIIIIII 1111
mapiewuoa neignts
lGHBO�d�00D LA�lD P��E P��
P�,41�I u1�D,4T�_
_ _ �.�.■
i �' � rr._
�� �� �
+.
� +.
,.
� •
��.
t wj �
f : J
�r�
t1
/�� �� `,
� ��� M
', E;
,�
•�;
� �.
.�
_ .��
i
t•ts �■
1= = `�
t1�1•Ii•i
M � =: � �
.._
IE;�� �i�
tl
- . --,mom _
- _ , �,_ _ ; . ki
1 - .. i r- . r � - Ir ' - -
9-t - I
. -
.- I
-�
cz� r .. -
a1 b ..�
X ,I &A -e p f c
J.- - - `xLtr•
li
hT_ . - - ., +t,
i X J . 4v
- 'i i -IL J, - � P,O I • r. --) - `
. "�_.
- -
m� ex���� . -1 -
I
I __ I - - .- . . __
. . �
7- .
LAJ
�.
_ .
L_
- - : - . - _ - _ ,rte °� e
F _�) �- - -.000
-
- � . r .
, i,
Ti .,.
t- - " ..r ",�'` _. i - - •'� a.0 ;_�- . - �L - _..
�'� YG.' e.: s► } .i" • ._r .. _ - - - ti; . _ w .. .. I .
L' - I . - r__:�, -z'& .#- L '.
mill
:. - I
-1 $_-�__ 1 - "
'_1 - b f �, -.--., � -
I - I
0- - -
, - - - .
1�4 1 -t --r - . ,110..-% -- - . - , ,_�
, _.
i�lll ZO I 111111
--#,*" - .:."- - - .
- 'L
- .
: 6 4
---- 40*
V - ,-w
`•- r „- "w..1*4 .�- , t �+r ___ rt :.r• ` '. s y ; -i.t �' "WV _i r
�1, -
4
-� _ y f .-. .-` '�.T�Z_` - '- * 4 r,ter• r �+.� .W -
s "
-00�
N4W�
. y
_ r' _ - _'. 4_�
- . - - • - - - - -_ - �r I-- �. . _ ! ., s , .. .4. _ �...t�`.�' .- �L ' ice" •j .
' � • - - r • .. - - - .. - `_. .. - . .-• a ._ r y - - - - _ , • ... , --. '..-.*
4
. _ . _ - _ .
• - . .
o� .. -, , �.. 1 1 - .ti _ _J_,%.� _ ��-r `Ir _sem` ' '
b.4, i -e to --_4 � ., "
- g%p
-_ . _.
, ,
. .1
4
.1 . L .
c • _ w , • - - - - _ - - _ - v y. - .-. f r .� .�•_
.�-. g, Y 1� r� .,. .: - -
. I -
. 0-
- I - ; - I . I ., - . . . -i . - .. )'4*L . 4, - - -, - -
-lb
- - �Z) - - , . - -,
. -_ . • ` - ` , . • .. _ . t--- - - -- L9 1 .._ `. . , - . - ,fir_ - - F' � • + - r, - • -
)p rlw*%o - - . , -- _� I I -_ _-_ .,� .. - _!��, . - - . . I I . . I L., . L- __ 1 .. . O., -..:. - ..'; . _ " -AA& :_ '. �. --� --� - * _- - - - , -, ,
... - _ _ • . _ � . ' 'ate - �+ - .i • �- � ,. v -
3
- ' I 'r "�1T> ..!'sem•-X _ , . - w _ ` - • _ r_... r , r _ _ _ _ � _ + M _ y _. • : a t,. - - _ _ ••" -
(I
. _ - - ic.- - �- a.... _ '� _ _ ` _ _ '''CCC _ ` - �r�y - -
.b_4t� " -Y'�- 1 C.` _'.d~'r2 rw `_ a. ", r f' - ♦ JA< t '� _ ^ :..i•. , ; .I..` _w .. �• t
I.
� ' a - •-�5.... ".� ..:I . - . ,' '-t - - Sc �_-?;`a.r ;.- .l SV' `` • � - L•'• ' �r 4w s - -' y ` 7 d - . `7 _ ...•A • :iT'- -% " ... - .r. V% * I -
t' . I , . - .r .
;c�
.1_0
- _�,
- _ . . ..�• - -- c '` .I .4a ..- _.. -_ . ,.. moi_ ~ _ _ '�L'" �• a 1 ty r .•�-' -
) L
'* - ' �' ;'�'%_-�: - '.: t - .
-. . T%Nj�_,_ .
,- ja
%rz;s..t-- - - __
- ". L _
5.
. . - .- - ,�" _"' . Z. ,.� - - _.. _ . , .* . _ 11- - " - - I - . �1_ ..:. I - . - �, r: .�� .
- I .. . : . -_ -W � .- . I . --� If 91 -- - - --
I . I - __ , , I. . . . - . - i - - .1 . - . - - ..i I I - . -; -z - # -
- - .&I ,r,-" , I %00_Nqt" C_%J� . . - 01"'Noloo",** . , _. - - ., I.- - :-, " - _f - ..' .
� . . . . . , - Z. . ., . .- - . - , - .V% w,'�- . I
. . - _.. . - , -4 Ir - - _ % - I -!I . -_ - -_ -7 ,- . I - . - .. - - . - , . . . .. .* lo.._.,.��_.r_:.;�, --,. ,;� .
I . I �:_ 4 '_ . - . . 4. . . I . L . -_ ,:. . I I . , - I , .. - a - ,- -�& - -
I , - - .,. JL . . - . . . . I- .� . " . , 1�" � - . - .
- a - • `-` ` v _ ,r �_'._ ,N __ _ ' - _ - I , r _mss', -
t
. . - ,W _: �L - - - . . , ., 1. . . . _ - .A% , � .- C:� / 40 %J ,".A� . L,: , . .1 ,a I . � ..%: - - .
-11 I . .. ,..Oor - . . -�/_l .. . -s • _ _ _ _ -- • _
_ 1._
I 14 I- . - - "%.f . -, � : . . - - .. .-♦ �S • • •-
- . ,i_ " - , .- .- - Q_:.. ., ' , &_-- _-, :.. - - JE.
I
I . 4 r. -i 19; 4v
l4e�� - - �'___
) trc.oi
_/4
' t_ - ..- •- o -" 4�•= .a '"� `._j' %-- Ta _ ! '-'. _ FT' • .. `. . -� -4i V�'\r/'�fA Y . _.
.• - �, • _ _ r� _ .! - - ., s -• J ^ �`;� #r• �____
._ ¢ �- +fw.a f �+-=��,. _ : - Ars r �.L '-` sz j- " _ -
_ 1 '. :7\,� _ `! , ~- w_ -OA . , ' - .,s,_ - . 4- _�,►- _ f l y. • a '. j ,�: '?r� �, il.^ , r- .p - -I •f/ _��•i - a - 4" .•..- ,r. t+• 1.. �[ s L.-_ +. : - . _3'_. [,' f. • ' - t , - - .1{► �,.. ';�. L' '-•j w '�'_r �"i' 'T _Y t •' i .a Y . y -
1.
. - y - ? t� �--- •- _ ._ - . - - i-"• i --.,.:A - -*, : -',.. -1- -fit 2 t - - t ... • .. �„j= ' .a�.a +� .06r-c'�T- ',y 'C .'a' )/
- j�,/�Y%A.ia ! '• `'.'�: f _;l -+- t q, ,. - . S� +s •y _w" j�.y _ '4�..`_ „�. .>... '+ - --F.. _ aS a.�_ =/.�M
ollip
••
I .1
+ rte - '_r �� r �T. .. -..�., 1 t-'`•fi.' •'>. �l'!�•• �;'�' `� '_ - '• - r _ j�``� �.r .,.,,•s. �.�,♦�' ,,,;,+ .SLS- >y.�i. "r a-�"�.y1s� "7'a "• _ S• - , : T�Z��P:c _H-jK - -. A, .10 V --o X. _ �l , z` l i•,� -
v / �''; � _ i. w� i � . t �'• w� - ' _ w f - . � - a% = -a _. t �f : "= 'rte b R%"!� • I. ♦ , t _
_ �i'
v _ •.�'
- _
.- _ - 4
1 .T [ `~- 'P: �'� s a .. -moi; r . • r' `�'- y.L,
. V -:L. ,kr _ _
.- _
..R-:: ` - ,� - - - •Y - �^•'� `.. 1►'�'-'M:rs �'}} _ T-� ..s _ T . '. +r . r - . '"' . - .. M -' 1rr.-_ a.... w-ra `.:,. + •.` +..ti -.,,,. -� .
y` ' ! "� :ii J{ y • ;..;f, - �,� � a .► a - * «AM s T . - • -. Ss C `eta - i
. . &)
I ra .. _ -^y. i. �! _.r. , • •- _ r . ♦-/t ,T . `�•�` _ �'' - - -iF' _ - .�/�.>a. ! a•_.�aa"_ - 7"G.. •1t_ x r ;r+-�,'
- w - .;•A•�!• - `►- -R. `� 1-�• - - y �.0 + _ _ ,♦. - ��..., .� ,'•..41r_ k _ -• yr
�- •r - - _ '.► ."t _ jW 6K , . , - r : _ ' t -7•.,r S-.'rb'�;`'•• l'�, - . :7a�'u'!i2,. "" s K L'�* w a _ J�. -"•"5.,-.•r,� __�•s'
. ",.'� -:* : "44,4 L : �'. :. �.� t �� #- { , * 4_ •► - . s Kk t�;�F E .o .a.• - �y a Y„ f _ _ _ ' L ....r^� L. Ji . „�� --�
�� .,v,,' ` '^ � - ` +' .� r•; ^' . ' - z = 4 _ -. - ` r3,,. �4: � . c _ ` ' `APs f+ -`�•" •Vc +c!' '� �' +' 3 a ' �sL m".'s�i•- . -..a% .► 1 " �„_...- .a � ' ` -Q46N . - r r - ,� � .
- -_ '``�.r.a• . - „ :='a.a, Y'� �, _ - may,: `f�.... ,�= A- _.i � Al i- w '"',F.`., "�F- - :�- _'_.'�: ZT a , .,_.�^•�. � _ •:,�': "- _ . . A - c�
- - , . 'fit - I , * ` _ s _.� % _ • d+.a• - ` 1�- r w 1Q a�X . ► k► r =� i ;^,
`'� _ . -P-. .,I,: -.-'s . +, ' � mss.,-�_•-+-.;r- � �►. - . ,,..,y," -.,i �•T��i. ��� �`•^• � :t _S� -! k". ..�.� �,--+'�?'r � s - Algia 9 ' �•i•i► a , a_. `}i �"t.. .'rte"'' -'•i : T: � •y w- `-,'F-:,-,'s`�-,�'�..,�sF � . �►• • � y,.' -� a, �.T � - �+.. - � �.. •iry - •7r' _ J""'r
��tt + I �• - ii 7
4 _ . _ a" ;, ,..} -_"•M••►�. �t * t - r-•. ` S ti -,`a ` f. • ' :i 3i _ i ' -- v ., a^ AIC •' -' +�•' f '#1_"' ._'-.... ' �_ . T �'. - '•4`" ..►'a -'k i+ -"4a•-> •.� `'��,-•., .�.a:. _-:d r _ - - .-t- a..
• - _ -•a.�_ t.. ..`� "`_ ,t. _�..s +.a i'*t -;:r', ii ��;'ec !�'_ •• `.....�� - ' ;u..�.,i ' - _.�• nem - •asp _ r - _J;••• - y "- - - L.
_� ,.'
- -. v -. I.y"�s - r-: _,X� d,�#' �"4.-.,` X_ =.-'tt •;•; `r,•' i�i•I••'.a •tL =� w1 -4r+ -_w».r `..I -�' - _.Y -�. ,. '�l�•;.✓'�'+"y' .1. _ r •-?`"'>'--• y,� c�r_ - - - r a _
`-.i r ^• `i ^� •t >'. -•' t r• • . .r - +_- `4- - - .•F L - el ,- -„ _ r .s - rr! • r :.s _ , ti -a _ _ , . ' - i
- t - _ !r' .r. .- ,mow•., , i ! +! - '•:'a ,. -14 ; Y .'T -� •w.., � wT__ `;- - • ':! t _>:...ti +- _ .'. _
_ L_ t'rte a• ►u -Wk a{ }► •► Ir .r a _ - _'s �► .±':..
- • - .. �. - ;,,;K, ` ''1 - _� kiy. _...- T - .!t -a � • > • ' :�._ :. .;.•.- . ..r -- �0 0 +-. -'+ - _ - _ -- a• '� _ _ - _
L - �ss - - -
y'`'_. �'. --• "__ w-. .V.." •�'•r . �' ti _ , • . •, t;; - *.7 � _- : I I. i ^ --,) - •w> -'•.. _ - - J _ y .l` L.- 'Z•s _ -' w . f -
°�-• .' _ - �.' ' .- =7► L r .� `"S'. j +t _�-" -+,`'!-"'-lr-i+� •. .ice -�-/�``�-.+r_ �y �1 .i -•i"- _. ... ,.. 1k1�' _:'f"~ -�I .k, ; -a► ��!`, ns'r•1r:R' Rf �•` �'': _
_o.. - `. �..� ,.. -,tom ;,''� �r F �, '. x ' . `"'' fes.-. S' �r .i�. - _.- �.• > +► ,i o._ y"` ,�► ... �s .t _ �-. It L ? • -7 .~..- ' e . : ,4� ',•-:: -,. }�' a..... - - .
` -Y-'.i , t'I'.�-.-�..a„�.,.,•^•=,J..�.i.~-- a '•�Ir+. �c..r �:r..�. r _ �`; •` •.�• - .+-•�k.�t.'u�r^• ".�• w.rr •'^•�: _ -�s .R•.� - .�~•T. �`'•' ii. _ I -
n.. ,;? n'. mar' .'a'r 'J^r > _ ''` " • Sr �_ � 4L, � 4r• � . ` �:► , - � 1`.' - - ,.-' r L. - ?- i x� k , - v
a „ - - a : +w'a's. �•• *r_ . r. + c.--�. �, '�' �:.-mz -�F �r•. �=-.r'e'k '_ •ac_ : 7.`. v'.'- '_•K ' f _ •- . _
_46
.nr
V. • - w� Y ,�-. � _T r-w.j �!v � i:.•.'•� y_ _,�''L,� �'� ' �i F�,r r'r--i.:•� •'� • � ",� 1 y j - Y l e !`.- �l - -1
- -•� '•.r �h P" 4�„ A171 C. , - _.
`_ i" . _ "-'ai 1. - - - �J._ _ r_'-�,..L_ T -•-"L .at.., , i-"_ •�!• ,U.•r•,t•s :a s- -, >.. tR. jY v - .+r' wa °•'t'�,J a'•��j• •r. ..
--_ - ...w•e .. ++• " ap a. 3 - �„kl� •• ;s.�.*, s •i1Ar•.•""' torr Ar`., :.rail'/' � �*4 0' ___--�_ s ' ,r' R �. s' � ..- .'lam•`. -' r+'-•- - - Yt`"! 'Vi -7Z
,e,�{"'- +^011.•x,[ '� •,
>`•"�. !� _•. "E• '�' - A*�.i s-• . _a's'_•.•,i4► i'-'�,..�.�w.c+ 'c'� s_ a Y , r+ •.r n'IL - . k�i" r -w.r _ .s['• •I�.- � r ro}`y. - �'+ -i;, ` '•t a,i. Z, _ '`*-�,:i. aL. -ri ��'-._, �..- -
-
4r ^.+... _ w . - ��`"' _ ,.J► -'a Asi- .."' l�.rL .. „ r1 _ ;•;;"�••.r+! -'a- +c • r _ 1 "o .s :X
'-1• tr": . t ,,;.� - L,
~.•- '� •,� 1 .: ."'�,. 's9.s _ L. -.-'7 w _�''y i1+ � ..r•- _ .� ""^ " -' "'--,_•f`S',�•--'• - 'a -, '�i.`` `"*->f r J". .. - ,_m -r',�-i.:.� •~ - _.
,;may. 3 _ _ •'' _". "�j� .�� ` ^ »•. - Y' _, 'f" _ 'ter• _• - v •` 3', �'a" ` K,r►�•�'',,13�, ••_,_. .= .r _
- - r ♦. - y _ - ._ �� ,l.i'` i.f ~' • _ '`' '� .Y. - y c' '+i' •t ... j_r� _M•cr7C �� -air •�, EwC .Jyl..• - ;' t �� , 1 "t' _ i .. . A. x! _ .� �•:� �R'rR � 9- *:"`"� � . w
~ w - _ - 'yam' '�'•�i'� - t''�. i +� .:' w.'y` '- „ .y �, _ •... v a t Y{'r's - , �' c err .a? -''� ' iS - ,� x • / 2 'r. - _ _ ♦ - .
v- 1V.. -r4 - t 7� ` y,�r� �..'7�a" z ' ,.�`.1M" rL;A `+► = ' �L': "S� rt - a�nr e I "7c +fit _ .w'r i e Y _' 1!� -✓� d - �` 'iA
�. _ .-� "�,wt3 r! t7 ,.. .,.fL' y.•- '�,�ia•�13�r�S �-�/"11�y'"g�ar"��:!4-._ e x'`�.� -;�,r":. +yrs':►: r S- pr►�g :_-.d�io�p"'�?� is
. . '' ,t - .y -..tet - i r.� f. *+-- ,-ow} r,.-�r'�•✓r� y a��A A %.�'t Zra- /! `'•�'$is'4?! 's^ . i .,'. _'•!'! _1 • •>7r.�- i� •,r• a r -- -w•-., .► •`-•'a.s' ~.. _
. _ e tr -� : �• •4.AP'tr - .,.y _ a i .lo -v ..,�u..�, •yi: -_ �,�{•.- :'t • -"" _ _ r -r '�-. .-a y _ .�_.r _i >:, '`A.'�tyi i�11•+.X,^•�A �•.. - �•I v"( _
a. � ..� - - �> 4� ., . ' t" wr . �.. +a: ret r * - _<T" -� ••1i... _ d a`1'• w'!�•4 .,ii► ,,eM�,. ai�"'••�` J : T � } � • --�1 '� "_ '•• -1 ` a -.!'• f 1"w ♦ - .:. , j a -1. -1►_
?�-_ •_ _' I _ '�� 1_.rr-0'.•" ��tR- � � _ in .•_ - �„r _Li' _--i• •�i.��, 'tJr. '-'t'� Ier . j s��E it. a �_ '�- mss'.' t E '_ _t ry'� yw�•,� 1 Ze
,.� ` t.. ... �` ..-.�� : '-W.Wf z� i "t:' c.✓y�,,,, .- - .�i'!'F�. a ,� .,_ -
ar_ `4 �" .y..,��-.- . ' T�-sft�','',i7�s-+ : -,�• r,��i.`.-i=•!t`'J' ; __-. J
c .. i ` y {_; I �F •yi'4{" s .� T �a ti ,,, �t �c r �' I :! d '! " �- fir. i ''` '-
�,• -'^•�,-,-a�•,� _ ,�'�+yy _-i- t •ate i'w 'r.,� - f .•"7I ` -:-��•�• - ,..�} .r f'.s_.et1+��"'• _ '_
:. _• �F _
_ -
.• •-
? -. iia ,, i =�"�.. a, qq .1.ai• .- rt ^,v 'lY•'�11' - ' -♦ ++ r ..►. ��
1� ~' �- _
r-�
t - _ '� - •�r��w, ., _Z� �' "'a. .. JI f"af �•!•�i_:"�•1;14 - �nh.�+-. r . 7?...i%- .7 - .';. r ^„�.,�i `7 a =S =.
f -t> er __ �r.�-i, y► nY _F~ .� �I�' a �tM I w.`Ig'!�-_�licsra,7 -'!." aL'tr•. il�',,.�.� r. i 4. -.i .ir-
_ _ wi � ,:Mie.•- .�_ +i '"I _ •.--�` �T -�. - '^ +,. �.a•�,.{.. y� �- .r�! a A,,a _,. _'�' -'w- j. t ..w !' > ¢i" ,.►.a. e. - , -
.ie.L� - i�- •ri•� T r . •_ mett * f �' .� `'y - a �',�'• sem, S' :4 r?: �� • "*_c' Y>'i�y/� "a" ' �►+'.yJ, ">'c'[�- ^ _ _ :�!Y �+i �. _ Vii-.- - `•''aTi,.r ,4 •� 'M►'= •+t,' 'Z R
=,y� _ -� t �'`'i!e••Q;�Y% 3_;- f' 5A I .5 .- :, t_rs - &. - :-..,,.-, K►' , _._C'tt `rt 7�•+ `,r'•ri^t°-'>je�• � - "60, - �" r . .
_ /'' _ y� .,..�, _ :'1, rt. s s .� • • . t' .I- .•.,w `- 'Cw'}�l.> y+?�.��^'y _ �fF'a_ _ ,�; -.�•.��,.�R�i� �` y j�� - • + �.�'} ►;A"'" f
"_'1 ' _ s -` xt' L _ ,x • f-' ."*'�'•- ► ' 4 ':a"" "" q. �" + f.` `L `l•�a", *,'\ ` `± ► . �k;" `. '� ,�•' f `, L` 1' 1. • �'1/•is. -f--- r"R',�R+ -r., .. �� • f� t,R`..� , �t - "'_�`�'•r` . ` .,. -
_ _' '1 4 i.(' _ `�' ,moi'-"'rF�' ►I'- ` �Y 'a'° `w`9� ' j f .'�' 1 •� ( x t-' • i.Xi • � • v - li• i�r, •4, ,.:.r ,"' fir; - �'." • q.: �I, vQ;r .. _ 0 >,,:..
�+• S+V,'` n i` yam• ._t _ *r y� i ryP'S_ _ x� ' '
u_ ' �!' `''r te T q'/ ✓.��.7►`r- " ;� AO`-- *•• . ` ir! i�G •r? �"r .� __, r^ rw4ii `� j�.0,-t--' ` �F= ' C , - _;l
�,_ JS ^- .'- IL� i _ •i.,�? t_ L � �. yam• •��e� l `�'"~.Y' ts'rr_ 7k•_ ..,,.�-'!+ v_ f'�•� • -j `�i-
.r ' �: +mac. �~ r s`L= .c ; aP. •y�,A s/s±�v�."'_ . �"is-y .r - ?�► II.I r�Y� -
ddE
3r,1141 T,
-+r wr • �,�c 9� "1 ���` 1Iy ar-.. • -W •.�'�i��►mss 1 x sem., ; ,fir 1. _t ` �;
Z_ llk,l _ i .w _ - i -a Y 1r+ .a _ ,�i'r. ' r. " a -�.�_ + ,.-.•� 7 �� S �,!noz �- .�,l- i - 'arr` .•►`y ;•, ,.
= 1 '-� t� ,.f �i� :• r.?_ +,�. 3- a+� �"f'- I �:►�f +►. a ;� il, it tr � ��_ 1m_. �a �' �i.f r
- - '.-:.: 1A. .>. a .r�! - 'r,(• +s�., f,��Yr. _� •R. 9_ � ✓ ,�•-.i -► IV •`�•r. ♦ -1 - i ^.: _.'J ,af4'!0* .%n.4� ,► . y .1 a" _ -•.-!-
_pwY_ . L' I
•,:`- . w� .;. 'k+'•` 414= , .. ' f... ""; • , _ '.>rr Fi. ) � �� ' Y� �. •fi � �� ,+-. - 724, -L3". •s„'�T�T*a .�-�iI'•�,..b '. • '•••- �I[ e = - !"4.. - . !� f,.r�� � * . � ,; _ �.
t _ q.- f .. `r�'-ire s, -x J • * "►x �`A► . - . 3 y`_ -fir _ ., +a-� �+ ..r' . `' �•�r,'�` ,,► w i .r_ ♦ .
- - 0 - ".- t .: i! -f'i: - -r .••.=+ " �,; w �i► .r s �^ -�/ y� ew _ "`A�'",.. o.r ..;j i s
�` - _ ai•`. •. .4 -►r » �mit.�%�7 t ':✓-•�,,;.T a �. y,/w+, �. S' L' ' .0 . •'� - v, , :` - �► +, w �.a wj. •-4 v- '. ,� s '��' i'' +a, ...; ,`.. ri i
fir. 4", y 4r•• ; w ..W-- - i�/�: _ -. • #.,.�. "r►, v- �•... �►-'i 'es•-.., _ '• -.�•+ ai Y :'. _'+r__, ''
.c . ` - -S' r •- +w ;= `e,.� rs, ' " s.: �p' ► +►� ata ; xJ "%!! , '� '�'-`-r- !' ie � r.. �F .4 r. � r �sti�x�- .,r - aa- -
• . ` _ .� • ,_ r►...-' x► •cam/►K� ! . Tt . r'� . -1. ♦ a.a . _ •�-' 'to" -^ r' - 1 '�' t �:' `%-�► ry.+'s < 4 . y, ;:-.7
.
yQ �' ? I �' '�' '" .-; _ � - Y �' • c' i�!/k`i .11 1.. , .. .f fl, • s�r6r.-��.r�i-�.��i� yam` I - --.�-tel -k•ys �a ' ♦ ;.y+r `.w � ♦ - ti' a �
_'►, -� ••3•-"• " �` ��p�.• -�'. Vk ".K yI p -s .aw�t�' "Jti. -� � fi ate•'•- �' ' #-' `s r!a•�T- 1 ''/ ys�•.. .•i"_`!%„ ,�" 4 _ - .
` - �,rr►•.t'"!t ...� �r• ` �' '!� ..i 7L` -'l •�..•trr . _ j'±C- - +-STC.. +-meq♦. . - . !'�-• ��.I°�'•'' '-�i�• .4y�'� +ef +- "�
.ti -!L fas+•a.e�._- _ _M.+ ,• �+► _ .f-"lir, �►. -•4'� ^�•a. �'•,,�i•._ l.._. .� �! _ ,� - '•' .'rM►"^� ' !
• 1 i00W,� -•.. 'lrs 4 ..r. •I A 7- � - •'~ :wv7i'"' +k3/i�.�ii� r+ , c .J�y . 1•�+. . "�,'! 3r _ +r"s - i f!'�°` '1�
NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING COMPANY OF THE TWIN CITIES, INC.
1700 WEST 78TH STREET, MiNNFAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55423 612-866-3381
July 23, 1981
Mayor John Greavu and City Council
City of Maplewood
1380 Frost Avenue
Maplewood, .Minnesota 55109
Dear Mayor Greavu and Council Members:
On Thursday, August 6th, the Council will be considering
proposed amendments to the Sign r
g Ordinance to Increase the
minimum spacing requirement from 500 feet to 1,000 feet
and to delete the requirement for review by the Community
Y
Design Review Board. I am writing to express our support
p pp t
for both proposed amendments,
Sincerely,
, LA a �4'j
Nancy
NJorgensen, Associate
Director Community Relations
NJJ:bap
cc: Geof Olson, Director of
Community Development
Action by Council:
Endorsed
Ido di f i e d�_.._______..
Rejected
Date
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Sign Code Amendment - Billboards
DATE: May 27, 1981
//,040 3
Action bar Council:;
Endorsed-.- __..
Modif -ie d ..._..,.�...
Rejected
Dat -
Council considered an amendment to the billboard ordinance on April 2 and tabled
action for further study. The enclosed proposal has been revised, based on comments
from the Council. The Community Design Review Board recommended approval of the
original staff proposal,
Enclosed is a copy of the existing billboard section of the sign ordinance and a
revised ordinance recommended by Staff. The following is a Ti st of significant
revisions in the proposed ordinance with an explanation:
1. Definitions:
The definition of "billboard" and non -accessory sign (off -premises)" have been
replaced with "Off -Premises Sign".
The sign ordinance has similar definitions for "billboard" and non -
10
accessory sign (.off -premises)". In order to avoid confusion, they are
replaced with one definition for "off-premi.s-es signs ." .
2. CDRB Review:
The requirement for review by the Community Design- Review Board has been
deleted. The review has served no significant purpose . The ordinance does
not allow review of the sign copy, only the sign structure. Since location
and size of these signs is determined by ordinance, there is little 1 oft for
the Board to review. Thi's review delays the permit and wastes the Board's
and Staff's time.
3. Location:
The zoning districts where off -premises signs would be allowed has been
clarified. The existing ordinance allows them in "industrial, manufacturing,
commercial or retail zone districts." In another section of the Ordinance it
states that billboards are not allowed in the LBC, limited Business Commercial
and CO, commercial office zones. The proposed Ordinance consol i dates , but does
not change the existing requirements.
4. Spacing:
The minimum separation requirement has been raised from 500 feet to 1,000 feet.
1,000 feet should be established as the minimum separation needed to maintain
a safe and attractive appearance along public streets and highways. 1,000 feet
is the median 1 of the minimum separations required by the 12 cities that are
closest to Maplewood in population and allow billboards. (See enclosed survey).
1
The median is found by ranking the cities i n order of required separation di stances ,
and finding the distance that divides the cities into two groups of equal numbers.
5. The fees and permits section has been deleted. This is already covered in the
fees and permit section of the overall sign ordinance. The requirement for an
annual permit renewal has been dropped, since it served no purpose and creates
unnecessary administration time.
6. A new paragraph has been added regarding ground restoration.' This is. to
require that ground which is disturbed during the construction of a billboard
be restored to its original condition.
The remaining changes are basically organizational. Requirements for
bill boards are in several sections of the sign ordinance, making it confusing
to administer. The enclosed ordinance consolidates these sections and includes
recent State laws.
Recommendation
Approval, based on the findings in the Staff report.
r&%^I ^eb I INA^ .
Proposed Billboard Ordinance
Current Billboard Ordinance
Survey
- 2 -
PROPOSED BILLBOARD ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 818 OF THE
MAPLEWOOD CODE RELATING TO SIGNS
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: -
The following portions of Chapter 818 of the Maplewood Code are hereby amended
to read as follows:
Section 2. 818.020 DEFINITIONS.
The definition of "billboard" shall be revised as follows:
Billboard: same as off -premises sign
The definition of "Non -accessory Sign (Off -Premises)" shall be deleted and
replaced with the following:
Off -Premises Sign: A sign advertising a business, profession, commodity,
service, or entertainment which is not conducted, sold, manufactured, or
offered on the premises upon which the sign is placed,
Section 14. 818.140 OFF -PREMISES SIGNS
l . Location
a. Off -premises signs may only be located in the following zoning
districts:
SC Shopping Center, BC Business Commercial, BC(M) Business Commercial
Modified, M-1 Light Manufacturing, and M-2 Heavy Manufacturing zones.
b. Off -premises signs shall not be permitted on a building.
2. Spacing
a. An off -premises sign shall not be located closer than:
(1) 1000 feet to another off -premises sign on the same side of the
same street. This spacing does not apply to structures separated
by buildings or other obstructions in such a manner that only
one sign face located within the above spacing distance is
visible from the highway or street at any one time.
(2) 200 feet to a residential district
b. An off -premises sign shall not be erected or maintained in such a place
or manner as to obscure or otherwise physically interfere
with an official traffic control device or a railroad safety
signal or sign, or to obstruct or physically interfere with the
drivers' view of approaching, merging, or intersecting traffic for
a distance of 500 feet.
3. Size
The maximum area of a sign face shall not exceed 850 square feet in area,
including border and trim, but excluding base and apron supports and
other structural members. The maximum size limitation stated in this
paragraph shall apply to each side of a sign structure. Signs may be
placed back-to-back or in a V -type arrangement if there are no more than
two sign faces.
4. Height
The maximum height for off -premises signs shall be determined by the
height requirements for on -premises signs in the zoning district in
which the sign is located.
5. Lighting
a. Off -premises signs shall not be illuminated with flashing light or
lights, except those giving public service information such as, but
not limited to, time, date, temperature, weather, or news.
b. Lighting shall be effectively shielded so as not to impair the vision
of any operator of a motor vehicle.
c. Lighting shall not interfere with the effectiveness of or obscure
any official traffic sign, device, or signal.
d. Off -premises signs shall not use lights between mitdni ght and 6 A.M.
6. Ground Restoration
Any ground area di strubed, due to the construction or removal of an off -
premises sign, shall be restored to its original condition.
7. Non -conforming Signs:
Any off -premises sign existing at the time of the enactment of this ordinance,
and not conforming to its provisions, shall be regarded as legal, nonconforming
signs. They may be continued, if properly maintained. as provided in this
ordinance. Nonconforming signs which are structurally altered, relocated,
or replaced shall comply immediately with all provisions of this code.
8. Any previously adopted requirements that conflict with this ordinance
shall be null and void.
This ordinance shall take effect after its passage and publication.
Passed by the City Council of the
City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this
day of 1981.
Mayor
Attest:
Ayes -
Clerk Nays -
' excade, exit, or stand-pipe. No sign shall obstruct any window to such an
xtent that, any light or ventilation is reduced to a point below that required
b any law or ordinance. Signs shall be so located as to maintain all quired
cle ances from overhead power and service lines,
4. The min mum height of •a projecting sign aboveg rade shall be nine fee
5. The maximu height of a projecting sign above the roof line shall b five feet.
6. The maximum pr ' ections hall not exceed the height of the sign.
Section 12 . 818.120. CANOPY OR MARQUEE SIGNS,
Y.Signs may be placed o attached to, or constructed in amarquee.
2. The minimum height of a nopy or marquee sign sha Xbe nine feet,
3. No canopy or marquee sign s 11 extend or pr ject above the lower edge of a
canopy or marquee more than t ee (3) feet . ix (6) inches.
Section 13. 818.130. ELECTRIC SIGN
1. Electrical equipment used in connection With display signs shall be installed
in accordance with the NationaL/flect ' cal Code.
2. Animated Signs:
a. No animated signs s11 be erected or maintained in any residential land
use district.
b. No animated sites shall be erected or maintai ed closer than seventy-five
(75) feet from any residential land use distri on which there exists
structures ded for residential purposes.
c. No anima d sign may be erected in any location whic would obstruct the
/Nrevolving
or be confused with .a traffic signal or sto sign.
3. Rens:
a. unit may revolve more than eight (8) revolutions er minute.
4. Se may be used for the grand opening of a new enterprise o an enter-
/ise under new management for a period not to exceed seven (7) days, her
enterprises may use such a device only yearly for a maximum of seven (7) n-
cutive days. The beam of such searchlight shall not flash against any bu ding.
Section 14. 818.140, BILLBOARDS,
I. Location:
Poster panels or bulletins are subject to review, except for copy, by the Com-
munity Design Review Board and may be located on Industrial, Manufacturing, Com-
mercial or Retail Zone Districts subject to restrictions set out in this ordin-
ance, Billboards shall not be permitted on a building.
2. Spacing:
— 15 —
' No billboard sign may be located closer to any other such advertising devices
on the same side of the street or highway facing traffic heading in, the same
direction than five hundred (500) feet on any city street, Primary highway, in-
• terstate ,or fully controlled freeway within the incorporated City, provided,
however, this provision does not prevent erection of doublefaced, back-to-back,
or V -type signs with a maximum of one (1) sign per facing.
3. " The above spacing does not apply to structures separated by buildings or other
obstructions in such a manner that only one (1)* sign facing locat.ed within the
above spacing distance is visible from the highway or street at any one time.
4. Size:
The maximum area of a sign face shall not exceed eight hundred fif ty (850) square
feet, including border and trim, but excluding base and apron supports and other
structural members. The maximum size limitation stated in this paragraph shall
apply ,to each side of a sign structure and signs may be placed back-to-back, or
in a V -type construction,
5. Lighting:
a. Billboards will not be illuminated with flashing light or lights except those
giving public service information such as, but not limited, to time, date,
temperature, weather or news,
b. Billboard lighting will be of fectively shielded so as not- to impair the vision
of any operator of a motor vehicle.
C. Billboard lighting must not interfere with the effectiveness of or obscure
any official traffic sign, device or signal.
b.. Fees and Permits:
a. The fee schedule as set forth in this ordinance will apply equally to bill-
board signs.
1'
b. Annual permit renewals will be required. Permit renewals will not be accepted
more than sixty (60) calendar days prior to expiration of permit. All per-
mits will expire on June 30th of each year.
C. The .annual fee for such renewals will be on . the same basis and schedule as
prescribed for the -original permit.
d. A penalty of Two ($2.00) Dollars will be charged upon failure to pay the
annual permit f ee f or renewal on or bef ore July 1 of each year,
f
e. The administrator may revoke the permit granted herein, for cause upon
thirty (30) days written notice of such hearing to the permittee. Such
notice and hearing are subj ect to the procedure as outlined in Section
818.040, Subsection 9 of this ordinance.
7. Non-conf orming Signs
Any billboard sign existing at the time of the enactment of this ordinance and
not conforming to its provisions, shall be regarded as legal non -conforming
signs which may be continued, if properly repaired and maintained as provided
in this ordinance and continue to be in conformance with other ordinances of
this municipality.
Non -conforming signs which are structurally altered, relocated, or replaced
shall comply immediately with all provisions of this code.
S&Ction 15. 818.150. TEMPORARY SIGNS.
1. o temporary sign shall exceed one hundred (100) square f t in area. Temporary
signs of rigid material shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in area, or
ei ht (8) feet in height. Temporary signs may remain ' n place for a period not
exc eding sixty (60) days, or until completion of pr ect.
2. Porta le signs:
a. Por ble signs with content of a public i formation nature shall be permitted
with t need for a permit. Such signs all not exceed two hundred f if ty
(250) quare feet in area and shall b limited to thirty (30) days.
b. Other po able signs Shall not exc ed thirty-two (32) square feet in area or
ten (10) et in height without proval of a special permit by the City
Council,
3. The following are permitted temp ary signs:
a. Political signs includin campaign and non-political campaign signs.
b. Real estate signs
c. Holiday signs.
d. Construction Sign .
Section 16. -818.160. STANC\ER M POWER LINES,
1. The distance sign shall bted from Power Lines, will be designated by
local power comp ies.
Section 17. 818.1 0. DISTRICT SCHED ES.
Signs shall be p rmitted as set forth in Sign Schedules I to VI inclusive, which
are hereby made and declared to be an int gral part of this ordinance,
Schedule No. : All 'Districts
The follow' g special purpose and temporary s ns shall be permitted in all dis-
tricts, s j ect to -the limitations set forth b low.
1. Tr f is control signs as def ined ' in the "Mot r Vehicle Act" subject to the
p ovisions of said Act.
2. Signs required to be maintained or posted by la or governmental order, rule,
or regulation.
— 17 —
BILLBOARD SURVEY
Staff surveyed the 18 metropolitan cities that are closest to Maplewood in
population, to determine the required separation between billboards. Six of
these cities prohibited billboards. The other 12 are ranked below by their
answers. The number in paranthesis after each City's name is their 1980
population. SEPARATION REQUIRED BETWEEN
CITY BILLBOARDS IN FEET
1. Burnsville (35.,674)
2. Plymouth (31,615)
3. White Bear Lake (22,528)
4. Coon Rapids (35,820)
5. Fridley (.30,228)
6. New Brighton (23;269)
MEDIAN = 1,000 feet
1. Eagen (20,..,532)
2. Blaine (28,,558)
MAPLEWOOD (26,990)
3. Crystal (25,543)
4. Richfield (37,851)
5. Minnetonka (38,683)
6. South St. Paul (.21,235)
2,000
Separation based on speed limit
55 MPH 13,500
35 MPH 15000
1,300
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
750
500
*500 on Interstates
400 elsewhere
*500 on Interstates
300 elsewhere
*500 on Interstates
100 elsewhere
*500 on Interstates
*100 on State Highways
0 elsewhere, individually
reviewed by special use permit
*State of Minnesota Requirements
The following cities surveyed do not allow any new billboards:
Maple Grove (20,525)
New Hope (23,087)
Brooklyn Center (31,230)
Golden Valley (22,775)
Apple Valley (21,818)
Roseville (35,820)
BILLBOARD SURVEY CONTINUED 0000...
For further information, the billboard separation requirements for suburban cities
adjacent to Maplewood that are not 1 i sted. above are as follows:
Oakdale Billboards prohibited
Woodbury 19000
(NOTE: only billboards promoting a business or activity in Woodbury are allowed)
Newport Moratorium on billboards
Little Canada Billboards prohibited
Vadnais Heights 1,300
North St. Paul 40
- 2 -
D. Billboard Ordinance
Richard Ragan of Naegele submitted written objections to the amendments,
proposed by the City to the Sign Ordinance. He gave',,-: a slide presentation
on the sign industry as to what their needs are regarding any proposed sign
codes. He also presented revisions to the Maplewood Billboard ordinance
that he said would meet their requirements. He indicated they have
approximately 11 billboard presently in Maplewood area. -
T
Chairman- .Sjola'nder suggested the Board table this item until the next
Board meeting. This would give the Board time to review the proposal
presented by Naegel a sign.
Chairman S jol ander moved the Board table the Billboard Ordinance.
Board Member Folley seconded
5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Billboard Ordinance.
Ayes - all.
The Board reviewed the proposed ordinance and also the revisions presented
by Naegel e Sign Company.
Chairman S jol ander said he did not think billboards should be permitted
in the BC (M) district. I.t appears that the spacing of billboards in most
communities averages approximately 1000 feet. He thought this would be a
good spacing for the Maplewood Ordinance. He discussed- the minimum distance
from a billboard to a building and also the maximum size of a billboard,
The Board reviewed the requirements for billboards that other cities in
the Metropolitan area has in their code.
Chairman S jol ander moved the Board recommend approval of the ordinance
amending Section 818 of the Maplewood Code relating to signs as presented
by staff.
Board Member Phi l l i ppi seconded Ayes - all.
MEMORANDUM
T0: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Special Exception.- Home Occupation
LOCATION: 1758 Clarence Street (See enclosed maps)
OWNER/APPLICANT: Jack Johnson D/B/A Asphalt Service
DATE: July 239 1981
Action by Council:
Endorsed.
Mcdifie
Rejected ---
SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL Date
Request
Approval of a special exception permit to allow an asphalt business to continue
to be operated from the applicant's home.
.Proposal
------------
premises. The office serves primarily
1. Customers do not generally visit the p p y
as a business mailing address and location for a business telephone,
2.
No
signage is
proposed.
3.
No
commercial
equipment or vehicles are parked on the subject premises.
4. The office is staffed by the applicant's wife .
5. The business is active, May through November.
BACKGROUND
Site Description
Size: 80 by 132 feet consisting of 10,720 square feet.
Existing land use : A single-family dwelling and garage. The applicant's business
has been operated from his home for the past two years.
DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS
Planning
I. Land Use Plan designation: R1, Residential Lower Density
2. Zoning: R-1, Residence District (Single -Family)
3. Compliance with Land Use Laws:
a. Section 904.010 (4) of the City Zoning Code allows offices of professional
persons in single-family districts when located in the dwelling of that
professional person or persons, and when authorized by the lawful governing
body.
b. Refer to attached Planning Commission Home Occupation Evaluation Guidelines
Public Safety
All commercial trucks should be prohibited from the premises.
CONCLUSION
Analysis
The following is an item by item evaluation of this request against the Planning
Commission's Home Occupation review guidelines (attached):
a. The business is seasonal, from May through November. The office is not
used for other business purposes dUri ng the winter months.
be The applicant's wife staffs the office, No persons residing off the
premises are working in the office.
c. The office is maintained in one room of the dwelling and is clearly
incidental and subordinate to the dwelling's use as a residence
d. No signage is proposed. There is no visual evidence that a home occupation
i s being conducted.
e. There are no retail sales associated with the business
f. Other than a pick-up truck, all commercial vehicles and equipment are
parked in St. Paul. Occasionally, one of these vehicles is brought
to the premises for repair or maintenance.
g. Not applicable.
h. The use presents no fire, safety, or health hazard.
Staff's only concern is that occasionally, a commercial vehicle is brought to
the premises for maintenance or repair. In the past, home occupations have been
approved subject to business vehicles, to be parked on-site, being limited to
pick-up trucks or step vans. Consequently, the applicant should also be
restricted from servicing or parking his commercial vehicles on-site other
than a pick-up truck. The other aspects of the request are consistent with
City policy.
2
Recommendation
Approval of a special exception permit to operate an asphalt business at 1758
Clarence Street, subject to:
1. Approval is granted for one year, after which time, the applicant may apply
for a renewal if the permit conditions have been complied with.
2. Not more than one person, other than members of the family residing on the
premises, shall be al lowed to engage . i n the operation of the office portion of
the business..
3. On-site advertisement shall be limited to one sign, not exceeding two square
feet in area, mounted flat against the wall of the dwelling.
4. Maintenance or repair of business vehicles and large machinery, other than
a pick-up truck or step van, shall be prohibited on the premises.
5. Asphalt Service shall be the only business operated from this office, unless
aPP roved for an "off' season" business is granted by the City Council.
Enclosures:
1. Location Map
2, Property Line Map
3. Planning Commission Subcommittee Report.
3
4• "� W KONLMAN AVE
KOHLMAN AVE. W
y9xff..,;,
C2
ROAD 0
J � J
&' z EDGE HILL NO.
IL
M CT W = <
--iaJ 65 ;
h DEMONTAVE.
V49_
ROOK AVE ? o im
U) ;
• a AV lith AV
ILL 1
61
ID Ir AWW
�S E x
L �. 1 GERVAIS AV E.
U VAI AV
a 6ANDVIE7W71�
A.'�' 36
_ VIK 1 Olt. _ ASTLE
LA.
IFE Ke Ho r �
F- Loke EEI
LLARK AVE.
J
T Y L
F' Q
LL E L AN
�— JUN TION AVE.
U
h
pN
= 4
� K a
J
• o pYpN
R
R.
s
FROST v
AVE.
J V)
49
< r�ic FRISSIE AVE.
I low
. 3 RIPLEY AV .�
Q
$0 PH IA AVE
~ z o
z
62 � W
A P NT
30
COPE
�0,°
25 c
7
RKE
ELDRIDS
SHERREN AVE
R EN Q'
AVE. OPE AVE.
LARK AVE. F: ~ LARK 11 AVE. h
�Il < z
LAURIE RD. _ LAURIE RD Y
W W
SANQJ z AvE. 65
C�
z <
h0�� Y 6� > Z
AVE. BU IRKE A <<
J AVE NAR.Ev woo R.
J W PUBLIC WORKS R .
ELMON T OVC AVE. N > Ste•
F.
ISKILLMA]
AVE. HA
Soo
ROS IWOOD AVE.
BRYdAlf t
4 28'
' J
Z9
h L�aL
»6 Lot
SU R t I
cc W m 5
2
Wakefield
oc < HKINQST
- Lake z 29
30P AVEW z Z 3 Z PRICE ZAV,
JJ J < >
PRI E AV G N<
o AV �_� ::•::
FIF--]FIFI u I
• � �—' 65
ST, PAUL
LOCATION MAP
or
dE
♦ 'ell
Z5
PROPERTY LINE MAP
PLANNING COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT
The Planning Commission concurs with the need for an appropriate definition of a home
occupation. It is also felt that while certain occupations require the issuance of a
special use permit, other activities such as those that do not have any of the following
should be allowed without a permit:
1. Employment of any person not residing in the dwelling unit
2. Customers visiting the premises' .
3. Manufacture of products on the premises,
The Planning Commission proposes the following guidelines for a Home Occupation:
Home Occupation requiring a permit is defined as that occupation conducted in a
dwelling unit involving the manufacture and/or sale of a product or service, subject
to , the following limitations:
1. I s conducted on a continuing basis, that i s , for more than 30 days out of the
year.
2. Not more than one person other than members of the family residing on the
premises shall be allowed to engage in such occupation.
3. The use of the premises for the home occupation shall be clearly incidental and
subordinate to its use for residential purposes by its occupants, and no more
than an area equivalent to 20% of the dwelling unit floor area ' shal 1 be used in
the conduct of the home occupation.
4. There shall be no change in the outside appearance of the building or premises,
or other visible evidence of the conduct of such home occupation other than
one sign, not exceeding two square feet in area, non -illuminated, and mounted
flat against the wall of the principal building.
5. There shall be no retail sales of products produced off site in connection
with such home occupation.
6. No traffic shall be generated by such home occupation in greater volumes than
would normally be expected in a residential neighborhood, and the need for off-
street parking shall not exceed more than three off-street parking spaces for
the home occupation at any given time in addition to the parking spaces required
by the resident occupants; in no event shall such number of off-street parking
spaces exceed a total of five such spaces for the premises and shall be off
of the street other than in a required front yard.
7. No .equipment or process shall be used in such. home occupation which creates
noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odors, or electrical interference detectable
to the normal senses off the lot, if the occupation is conducted in a single
family residence, or outside the dwelling unit if conducted in other than a
_ single family residence. In the case of electrical interference, no equip-
ment or process shall be used which creates visual or audible interference in
any radio or television receivers off the premises, or causes fluctuations in
line voltage off the premises.
8. No -fire, safety, or health hazard shall exist for the residents of the dwelling
unit, customers, or emp 1 oyee .
T0:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
OWNER/APPLICANT:
DATE:
Request
MEMORANDUM
City Manager
Director of Community Development
Special Exception -Home Occupation
1780 Ruth Street (See Enclosed Maps)
Kevin A. and Linda A. Krueger
July 29, 1981
SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL
Action by C ouno i j
End oYse;A
1J. o d i -If i e c �..�..—.,�.....
ejeotecl
Date
Approval of a special exception permit to operate a calligraphy business
as a home occupation.
Proposal
1. 19.8% of the dwelling floor area would be devoted to the business.
2. See applicant's letter for a description of the business.
BACKGROUND
Site Description
Lot Size: 75 x 135, consisting of 10,125square feet
Existing Land Use: single-family dwelling
Surroundi nq Land Uses
North: single-family dwelling
East: Hillside School
South: single-family dwelling
West: Ruth Street. Across Ruth Street, single-family dwellings
Planning
1. Land Use Plan designation: RL, Residential Lower Density
2, Zoning: R-1, Residence District (Single Family)
3. Compliance with City Code:
A. Section 904.010(4) states that offices of professional persons are
permitted in single-family residence district, when located in the
dwelling of that professional person or persons, and when authorized
by the lawful governing body
B. Refer to the attached Planning Commission subcommittee report.
-1-
Public Safety
1. A fire extinguisher(s) is required. The type, location, and number to
be approved by the City Fire Marshal,
2. An extension cord shall not be . used to power the off -set duplicator.
3. The location and size of house numbers shall be approved by the City
Fire Marshal.
CONCLUSION
Analysis
The followingi s an item by . item analysis of the proposal, relative to the
Planning Commission Subcommittee's Home Occupation evaluation guidelines
(attached):
1. The business would be conducted on a year -around basis, approximately
20 hours per week.
2. No persons residing off the premises would be involved in the business.
3. Floor area devoted to the business would equal 19.8% of the total
dwelling floor area. The business would be incidental and 'Subordi nate
to the dwelling's use for residential purposes, _
4. No signage is proposed.
5. Not applicable
6. Customer visitation would be by appointment only, averaging less than six
. visits per week. Adequate off-street parking would be available.
7. The equipment to be used consists of a drafting table, desk, work table,
off -set duplicator, and plate processor. Any noise associated with this
equipment would not be detectable by the neighbors.
8. This business would not present a fire, safety, or health hazard to the
neighborhood. Chemicals associated with the operation of the equipment
would be limited to a gallon of cleaning fluid and inks. Fire extinguishers
and smoke detectors will be installed.
Recommendation
Approval of a special exception permit for a calligraphy business to be
operated as a home occupation at 1780 Ruth Street, subject to:
1. The permit being approved for one year, after which time the applicant
may apply for a renewal, provided the conditions of the permit have been
met and no nuisances exist.
-2_
2 . Not more than one person, other than members of the family residing on
the premises, shall be allowed to engage in such operation.
3. Signage shall be limited to one sign, not to exceed two square feet in
area, non -illuminated, and mounted flush against the dwelling.
4. No more than two customer vehicles shall be parked on the premises at a
time.
5. A fire extinguisher(s) and smoke detector shall be provided. The location,
type, and number shall be approved by the City Fire Marshal.
6. The off -set duplicator shall not be powered by an extension cord.
7. House number, location, and size shall be approved by the City Fire Marshal.
Enclosures:
1. Location -Map
2. Property Line Map
3.. Applicant's Letter of Justification
4. Planning Commission Home Occupation Guidelines
-3-
KOHLMAN AVE.
23z
fun)
c -
7'
EDGE HILL
65
z
x
11 11
0) z DEMONT AVE.
RODK AVE .2 0
AVE. 11 th AVE.
SE x
DVAI AvE,
6 ANDVIEW
E;v] Eg
IVIKIR F—Dot. I ASTLF AV
W.
SHERREN AV
AVE
LARK AVE] LARK AVE. >
LA RD. z lz
LAURIE RD
D
?5 x SAND ZZ
@ z
64
L„e„ 49
>1
oc AVE. ou 6KE -1Z AYE7�
E
.RIDG, 6 J, AVE. VA
J w Pi
.MON AVE. W 64 .> a
pi
N m AVE. = HA RISso
............
ROS lW000 ))AVE.
ir i - -- .r -
z
0
E��
R A
•
Wokefield
Lok e
I A� E z z
GJ
AVE
t%,mp r
2640 No
N�
2400 NL
2160 N.
LOCATION MAP
NORTH
68 1HOLLOW ((AY
0
•
RI IPLEY AVE.
0
LARPENTEUR
L ,
n
•
r
` -- � `_ • � _� � •♦ �. �'�, •..�� lir i � y ��. � -� r � � �. ...�� � . �. � ..�r..�
f Ll _� i•t
L • 3 i � a• A
Al
X.
XX
f
r:
�To I
.t J T r 0
.�'A V.... '
I .
4
IT
I I
,.
• - ± �-�1 Vr r --
' ' I I •f
i
{
sr.'`:
;w
t
�
L�
•R
i
I
� �
r
t
ILI
• �.. � - . ,_ �3,a � . zoo-• � 4,
AL
ni
— 3 7'. tom.. i '. ,..... � • ._ • ...{ i, � � � } ..,�;.,tlr. 'L�1r .a. - � a�
L ✓ t � � " r �j.� � � �. • 3 �y� � �, Y �� • t � w' "�" � �i"- � �. ����v.a' �... !�t'.�°' � i 3.-irt .�+i.� ` i..t �•v �,.. •�Iwo71L w
PROPERTY LINE MAP
t
sr.'`:
;w
t
L�
i
I
� �
^•
t
�
v
^1
i
• �.. � - . ,_ �3,a � . zoo-• � 4,
AL
ni
— 3 7'. tom.. i '. ,..... � • ._ • ...{ i, � � � } ..,�;.,tlr. 'L�1r .a. - � a�
L ✓ t � � " r �j.� � � �. • 3 �y� � �, Y �� • t � w' "�" � �i"- � �. ����v.a' �... !�t'.�°' � i 3.-irt .�+i.� ` i..t �•v �,.. •�Iwo71L w
PROPERTY LINE MAP
- s
f
• pageHordeOecu ation Perrir A�1 ati FOrn2
Applicant: TevAtz .A. and ,Czndcz Ot. gilr'ueer
4. This residence is to be itsedfop ,7perwa1vart-tirrre
business in the home. T6efatzctiorz f the business is to
provide call (C des ande-vrnttn9
Calli9t'aPl?t�. , "harm lettermfl and Illumina-tion';
will be pe fvrrnec� to `vrvc�uce or�rnal art tivorhprimcrr��
flIr cert ficcrtex �ustness cards, reed cards, crnnounce-
ments and &ys4ay �aieces. 11171,t1n� as�ct f the
bust"n'e5s is intended topravfile f�et �iz�licQt1ort v�'t�ie
call�raPhe�
des ftt is also an ted
purpose du�lrcation will eprovided. T ae�rm� of 'cQll�r�r-
p�r dt site locations yvtllalso be per�ormea�
e pro`vose�
home oceulw�0'on willemPlo rlo persons
outsfc�eof t�e home. T1w average num�er o lzours fiver
weed rn o ration wi11 be no more tlzan m hours'.
Customer contact yvtll e vzapbom,,Per anal contact.
crrralrnarl. �.1I customer. vtsitatron to the resrlerlce
wflf Ae vim Q ointment vrrl , arveraire less t�ar� six
perweek., iverzes f Supplies -wtl �e ap�roxtm�fe�
two p¢r• week.
Oraor efu pme?rt to be used eons�sts v�'a drrr�ti � table, desl�,
work tile, �f 'set duplicator, ar�Plate �rocessnr�. �I "lu 0f 'set
duPlrecrtor
.-W a 11L a�vptovecl o ire aPp11Q'nee. ��or- sup Ifes
are of tamed on an as
-rlee ed fasts azlc�7rot stotec� in t
resi�etrce.
PLANNING COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT
.The Planning Commission concurs with the need for an appropriate definition of a home
.occupation. It is also felt that while certain occupations require the issuance of a
special use permit, other activities such as those that do not have any of the following
should be allowed without a permit:
1 Employment of any person not residing in the dwelling unit
2. Customers visiting the premises
3. Manufacture of products on the premises.
The Planning Commission proposes the following g'ui deli nes for a Home Occupation:
Home Occupation requiring a permit is defined as that occupation conducted in a
dwelling unit involving the manufacture and/or sale of a product or service, subject
to the following limitations:
1. I s conducted on a continuing basis, that i s , for more than 30 days out of the
year.
2. Not more than one person other than members of the family residing on the
premises shall be allowed to engage in such occupation.
3. The use of the premises for the home occupation shall be clearly incidental and
subordinate to its use for residential purposes by its occupants, and no more
than an area equivalent to 20% of the dwelling unit floor area shall be used in
the conduct of the home occupation.
4. There shall be no change in the' outside appearance of the building or premises,
or other visible evidence of the conduct of such home occupation other than
one sign, not exceeding two square feet in area, non -illuminated, and mounted
flat against the wall of the principal building,
5. There shall be no retail sales of products produced off site in connection
with such home occupation.
6. No traffic shall be generated by such home occupation -in greater volumes than
would normally be expected in a residential neighborhood, and the need for off-
street parking shall not exceed more than three off-street parking spaces for
the home occupation at any given time in addition to the parking spaces required
by the resident occupants; in no event shall such number of off-street parking
spaces exceed a total of five such spaces for the premises and shall be off
of the street other than in a required front yard.
7. No equipment or process shall be used in such home occupation which creates
noise, vibration, glare,, fumes, odors, or electrical. interference detectable
to the normal senses off the lot, if the occupation is conducted in a single
family residence, or outside the dwelling unit if conducted in other than a
single family residence. In the case of el ectri cal interference, no equip-
ment or process shall be used which creates visual or audible interference in
any radio or television receivers off the premises, or causes fluctuations in
line voltage off the premises.
8. No fire, safety, or health hazard shall exist for the residents of the dwelling
unit, customers, or employee.
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE
City Manager
Director of
Plan Update
July 7, 1981
MEMORANDUM
Community Development
Action by
Endorted_
MG dJLf e
R6 J
Dates
The enclosed letter of May 26 from the Metropolitan Council states that their . -
revi ew of the City Plan has been temporarily suspended . unti 1 additional information
can be submitted. The following items refer to the numbered items in the May 26
letter.
I tem 1 concerns a 1990 land use plan. I recommend that the following statement
be sent in reply:
"Since Maplewood is within the metropolitan urban service area, the City would
P
refer not to phase or stage growth on a geographical basis. The entire City
has access to sanitary sewer and any part of the City could be developed by
1990. It would, therefore, be misleading and serve no purpose to define
specific geographic areas that could develop.
The best indication of 1990 development is the population forecast table on
age 10-4 of the Plan. This table projects a 1990 population of 34,000
people, compared to the 1980 population of 26,990.
Item 2 concerns an environmental inventory. I recommend that the enclosed pages
from the "Planning Inventory", done by Midwest Planning, be adopted as an appendix
to the Plan Update .
Item 3 refers to the "Sewer -Policy Plan". Part A requests a breakdown by inter-
ceptor
nter-
ro
ce for of the projected 1990 wastewater flows. These flow projections are enclosed
p P �
in a letter from Edwin Smith.
Part B asks for the City's on-site system management program that will be adopted.
This is found on page 32 of the Sewer Plan. In addition, the City should add a
number 6 to page 32 as follows:
116. Require percolation tests and soil borings before issuing. permits."
Other than number 6 above, the City is not planning any additional implementation
methods-*
Part -C asks for - a designation of areas unsuitable
paragraph of page 31 *of the Sewer Plan states the
will be allowed. In addition, page 32 states the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regulations by
for on-site systhms . The last
conditions where= on-site systems
City's intention to adopt
reference.
e
There is inadequate soils information to define all specific areas where on-site
systems are not allowed. The City has chosen instead. to adopt a performance
standard approach to evaluating on-site system applications. These standards
are included in the Sewer Plan as noted above.
Part -D is .an informational item of which we are aware. s
Jem-t4- asks the City to make specific reference to Mn/DOT rules on air space. I
recommend that the following sentence be added to the Plan Update:
"The City intends to comply with Mn/DOT rules concerning obstructions to air
navigation".
Item 5 requests that a variety of information in the Barton-Aschman Transportation
Plan be adopted as part of the Plan Update. I would recommend that the following
sentence be adopted as part of the Plan Update:
"The Maplewood Transportation Plan, done by Barton-Aschman in 1979, is
adopted as part of the Plan Update, except that the Plan Update shall
apply wherever a conflict occurs between the two."
Recommendation
Adopt the enclosed resolution.
Enclosures:
Letter from Charles Weaver (5-26-81)
Environmental Chapter from the "Planning Inventory"
Letter from Edwin Smith (6-29-81)
Resolution
2
ID �e
►� N ct.r•
May 26,
1981
Geoff Olson
Planning Director
City of Maplewood
Department of Community Development
1380 Frost Avenue
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Metropolitan Council
300 Metro Square Building
Seventh Street and Robert Street
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
Telephone (612) 291.6453
Office of the Chairman
RE: Review of Maplewood Comprehensive Plan Review Commenced on April 22, 198
Metropolitan Council District Nos. 4 and 14
(T. Newcome, M. Hauser)
Metropolitan Council Referral No. 8585-2
Dear Mr. Olson:
The Metropolitan Council staff has completed a preliminary
review of the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan submitted according
to Metropolitan Land Planning Act requirements. Although the
plan is complete in many respects, several areas will require
more information as specified in the Act to enable the Council
to complete its review. Therefore, it will be necessary to
temporarily suspend the review process until this information
can be submitted.
Specifically, the plan should clarify or address the following:
1. 1990 Land Use Plan
The Land,Planning Act requires comprehensive plans to contain
policies and programs which guide development through 1990.
Since the Maplewood plan outlines what the community will look
like at full development, the city needs to clarify which areas
it expects to develop by 1990.
2. Environmental Protection
The plan should contain an inventory (map) of wetlands,
watercourses, floodplains, steep slopes, woodland and unsuitable
soils (high water table/wet soils),
3, Sewer Policy Plan
A: Maplewood discharges wastewater through 17 metropolitan
interceptors. The city should provide Maplewood's
estimate of its 1990 wastewater flow projection broken
down by interceptor.
Geoff Olson -
Planning Director -
City - o f Maplewood
May 26, 1981
Page Two
B. Maplewood's sewer policy plan states that on-site
systems will be allowed. The city should be aware that
the Metropolitan Council cannot review ordinances.
Therefore, the city's plan (implementation program)
should clearly cite the on-site system management
Pro the cit will adopt. Because of the density
program Y
allowed, Policy 44d and Procedure 10 of the Water
4Y
ualit Management Policy Plan applies.
C. The Sewer Policy Plan states that the entire City of
Maplewood, except the Highwood neighborhood, should be
considered unsuitable for on-site systems. However,
thep lan also states that the city "may also allow on.
site systems on a permanent basis for large estate lot
developments." Therefore, Maplewood's Plan should
designate areas that are unsuitable for on-site
systems. . The plan should clearly cite the conditions
y
where on-site systems are not allowed.
D. The Sewer Policy Plan provided by the system does not
meet the requirements of a Comprehensive Sewer Plan.
Although not a requirement rement at this time, the city may
wish to address the additional comments raised by the
MWCC in the attached letter. These comments will have
to be addressed when the city submits its comprehensive
sewer policy plan to the MWCC for their review.
4. Airports
In regards to the control of general airspace obstructions
within the city limits, the Plan should make specific reference
to Mn/DOT rules 14 MCAR 1.3015, "Determining Obstruction to Air -
Navigation, subsections (C) "Notification," and (D) "General
Obstructions."
L
5. _Transportation
Additional transportation information needs to be included in
p �
the plan before the city's plan can be considered adequate for
review.
Geoff Olson
Planning Director =
City of Maplewood _
May .2-6y 1981
Page -three
The transportation plan should contain the following
information:
0 1990 population, household and employment forecasted by
traf f is assignment Zones.
o Maps identifying metro facilities (Principal and
Intermediate materials) in the Transportation Policy
Plan and local linkages to these facilities. The
differences between the functional classification
system adopted by the Council and that used by
Maplewood should be explained.
o Maps of existing and proposed roads by:
1) functional classification.
Z) traffic volume for roads classified minor
arterial and above.
3) surface type and number of lanes for roads
with 10,000 ADT and above.
o Policies on accommodating and protecting existing and
planned metro transportation facilities.
o Maps of existing and proposed transit service.
Much of this required information can be found in
the Maplewood Transportation Plan prepared by Barton-Aschman
Associates in 1979. If this transportation plan is , current and
consistent with Maplewood's comprehensive plan --either in its
entirety or in part --it could be adopted by reference as a
component of the city's plan.
The plan is adequate for review in all other respects. The city
should be aware that when the detailed review is recommenced,
other important issues may be identified (such as 1990 flow
forecasts). -These will be thoroughly addressed in the draft
plan_review- statement, and a copy will be forwarded to the city
prior_to the Physical Development Committee meeting so that the
city will have adequate opportunity to respond. _
M
Geoff Olson
Planning Di rector
City of Maplewood
May Z6, 1981
Page -Four
IfY ou disagree with the basis for the suspension, the city may
appeal the suspension to the Land Use Advisory committee as
provided in Council Plan Review Procedures. Appeal requests
Y
must be
filed within 30 days of the suspension. The request
must be authorized by the City. Council, and it should be
directed. the Chairman of the Metropolitan Council. Upon
receipt of the request by the Council, the Land Use Advisory
committee ttee will contact and advise you on further appeal
procedures.
The Council and staff are anxious to work with you to reinstate
the plan review as soon as possible* if you have any questions,
please contact Ann Braden of our Transportation staff at 291-
63360
GB: lh
Sincerely,
Ck
Charles R. Weaver
Chairman
Summary
• Soils in Maplewood have been classified according to their site
characteristics for construction, Most! of the soils in the community
-have moderate or severe limitations. -
- P
The vegetation in Maplewood is characterized by a rather dispersed
. 9
cover,of urban trees, many of which have been susceptible to diseases
such as Dutch E I m disease or oak wilt,
• The City of Maplewood has made dramatic gains in the struggle against
Dutch Elm disease, and fewer trees are lost each year.
• Wetlands located in Maplewood serve the functions of providing settling
basins for excess runoff and wildlife habitat, and are preserved and taken
into consideration in all development requests.
• P
FloodP lairs in Maplewood have been identified by the Department of
HUD. Flooding is a problem in localized areas.
• Lakes in Maplewood have been classified by the Department of Natural
Resources according to suitability for development and relationship of -'
surrounding land uses,
• Water quality samples have been taken in Maplewood at several locations
on Battle Creek, and the inlet to Beaver Lake and County Ditch 18, State
waterualit standards for the levels of fecal coliforms were violated in
9 Y
several locations.
• Although there are no major point sources of air pollution in Maplewood,
it is hypothesized that overall particulate levels may be in violation of
state standards .
• The major source of noise in Maplewood is vehicular traffic. Although
the Highway Department does not have any programs for the construction
of noise berms in the City, it does encourage noise -sensitive land use
planning.
41
SOILS AND SLOPE
The map on the following page, "Soil Limitations". was based on the interim
Soil Survey prepared Y repared b the Ramsey County Soil and Conservation District.
Soils have been divided into three broad - classes: slight, moderate and severe,
- Soils -.with slight limitations- have site characteristics that. aril easy to manage,
and would generar11y be most appropriate for construction or development. Soils
with moderate limitations good.
requiremanagement and careful designing to
overcome site limitations.— Soils with severe limitations may be impossible to
.develop, - and special design or major reclamation may be required. Costs to
overcome severe soil limitations are generally high.
Areas with severe limitations for development are generally excessively wet or
have slopes in excess of 12 percent. The Cit can avoid development problems
P P Y
by requiring soil and slope tests to be made prior to approval of any development,
and by prohibiting development in areas with severe limitations.
42
,. .y. ..-.. ......., ..,..-..,. .t , m<.:.«.i+ x,,;mn•.xnTl^"2+.m+?.T+.�-va.rM .:a...+.+,+•. � ..
i f WWI KAN LANE
• H
AIS
HEWTS
0 0 0 000 0 at•
�•1• `ii •• �� � �: ��. i•�••iI'/ • i !% Ij `1111•I1���•,'� i••t.. • •`• t:1• .l•
• • V•• .•./\ r� . Int ••I CIL
ti• \♦ .••. •. •,�•�•\•1 •�:
• ':' � / :.�• / I: � �• •'. •Iwo s0" ••'�' • t "•'•/,• '/; • � ..sie»s: ra} _ (i�
uks
oo
This map is •r pla, M'rg
purposes only and should
not be used where precise,
measurement is required
OI LITTL[ CANADA /1
1 / ..
s
0
v
i
N
4
3
Oe
so*1
19imi tations
slight
r
Moderate
Severe
Source: Ramsey County Soil Conservation Service
t • f.
w[wrpar
VEGETATION
The vegetation in the City of Maplewood is characterized by a generalized
tree cover of young urban trees, located as illustrated on the Tree Cover
Map. -Although there are several scattered clumps of trees in the northern
half of the City, many tree masses remain in the south leg. T=_ he Ma l.ewood
= forestry program has three basic goals: replacing trees _lost to shade tree
diseases, disposal of trees lost to shade tree diseases, and landscaping and
maintenance of vegetation on City owned and operated property.
The City has made marked progress in dealing with the lossof shade trees to
Dutch Elm disease, In 1977, 5,000 trees were lost to this disease, whereas
only 917 were lost in 1978. This dramatic reduction is due to a strictly en-
forced program, that requires property owners to remove diseased trees within
five days, or they will be removed by the City within seven days. City personnel
feel that the program, which is partially funded by the Minnesota Shade Tree
Program, has been extremel successful, and the loss of these trees in the future
Y
will be drastically reduced.
Efforts are now being made to inventory the tree resources in the City to identify
areas that may be subject to other potential shade tree diseases. Although oak
wilt has not been a major problem (about 300 trees have been lost in the past
P
six years), there are about 140,000 oaks in the City and efforts will be made
to protect these resources as well. It is estimated that about 80,000 elm trees
remain in the City. One major reason for the success of the shade tree disease
control program has been the interest and participation of citizens of the
community.
During 1978, Maplewood coined together with other suburban Ramsey County
The nursery is under the leadership of the
municipalities to form a tree nursery.
Twin Cities Tree Trust. The Tree Trust is an organization which uses CETA
intensified labor to care for and maintain trees. In 1978, Maplewood put
$1,000 worth of trees into the nursery site which is located on Ramsey County
Open Space property in northern Shoreview. The Tree Trust plants the trees,
fences off the area, wraps the trees and has installed a sprinkler system for
watering. The Parks Commission has made a commitment to put $5,,000 worth
of trees into the nurser each year, with the intention that after five or six ears
Y Y
the trees will be harvested and transplanted back into City parks.
1 i WWI KAN LAKE r� r•w �•u �
VAONAIS HEIGHTS
o
17
.t I M .N
U i rrw.•Nrii •� ` r .rwr•a� iv
t
This map is for Waning
purposes only and shook! �=
not be used where precise
measurement is required
LITTLE CANADA
Source: Midwest Planning and Research, Inc., 1979
.•,w 0,
Vt!<J 7
w" 1M low .
NOIITN !T. PAUL
t
MATCN UK
4
0
I
�1
C
3M i f
i
r.;
• '
• •i � I
•fit
• .4
•w �J'i. •wAs�y� ON C�
NEWPORT
4 WETLANDS AND PONDING AREAS
0
Wetlands and ponding areas in the City of Maplewood have been located
on the following map. The location of the wetlands was determined on the
basis of soils maps recently released 6 the Ramsey Count' Soil Conservation
Y Y Y
Service, Wetlands are generally those areas with a water talile above five
feet in depth, - and may be subject to flooding at- some periods of theyear
Wetland areas serve the dual function of providing setts ing basins for excess
runoff, and an excellent habitat for waterfowl and other wildlife. Because
a considerable portion of the City is undeveloped, there is an opportunity to
protect wetland areas or designate them as open space areas to prevent dis-
ruption of the natural drainage system,
Many of the ponds in the City are already Located on City -owned land or in
parks. The Ramsey -Washington Metro Watershed District is responsib i le for
ensuring community participation in efforts to manage storm water in the
district. The Soil Conservation Service has taken thePo sition that all wetlands
must be preserved. Although it does not have the authority to enforce this,
the maintenance .and preservation of wetland areas is taken into consideration
in development requests and the City has attempted to prevent any further losses
of wetland areas.
46
@ 0 0 0 0
17 O C
I
Mfl
This map a for plannW9
purposes only and should 91
not be used where precise
measurement is required
CANADA B! UTTLIt CI
wetlands
4" Is.
% .
Source: Ramsey County Soil & Conservation Service
Mtj
3M
Oil
MATC04 LIOK
• t
3M
on" Long,
t� ..• t ! :1
A AAA
&A Nei
3M
owns
rot
lot
•
4#MPb
I" ••Mnomo
a its VI&now* 90-4 111 P" 401 &
Is 00fV40 O*Vq lot toll" Oftwil
LO ILI
dr
( MMA
PF -7
A* Web
0;
owl son d".
*fee
CO %j
SHIN0101111 Co.
FLOODPLAINS AND DRAINAGE BASINS
Floodplains in Maplewood were identified in conjunction with a Flood Hazard
Study conducted by the U.S. Department of HUD in 1974. At th is time, the
City of Maplewood also adopted a floodplains ordinance modification, pro-
viding that all building permit applications be reviewed .by the City Building
Official "to determine whether the proposed building site wnrbe reasonably
safe from flooding,
Several areas in Maplewood are impacted by flooding during peak storm periods.
The Drainage Plan completed for Maplewood in 1974 identified the following
serious problem areas for flooding, and made recommendations to reso 1 ve the
prob i ems .
1. Ponding area on both sides of Cope Avenue east of Hazelwood Street.
2. Brookview Drive, approximately 1,000 feet west of Century Avenue,
3. Outlet for storm sewer outletting north of the intersection of Crestview
Drive and H ighwood Avenue*
4. Gladstone area. This area has very little existing storm sewers.
5. Ponding area adjacent to White Bear, north of the Soo Line Railroad
tracks .
6. County Road B and Edgerton.
7. Northeast quadrant of Highways 36 and 61.
8. Able Street and Kingston Avenue,
9. Larpenteur Avenue and VanDyke Street.
Maplewood has made substantial progress in controlling flood problems since
..
this report was released. All development requests are sent to the Ramsey -
Washington Metro Watershed District for their comments, which are made in
accordance with the recommendations of the Drainage Plan. In addition, the
City plans to undertake a new sewer study to deal with recurrent flooding and
drainage problems,
48
%0
' WW9 KAN LAKE
low
Ova—
��� •
0 0 0 0ojt7 Its@ -
t�LVV
� 1 ► �� ec �:..d z i 171 , , ,
two
Now
gobowe& MONTH 1t. PAUL K 3
tiis i _ C 0 t
L11�
areN w
_ a
i ii !1!4•• ..•� s • >4.....
�]J 16W
W1 a< 3M
� t..
`• � `� y ,: .. I ��[ill � �� � O " ir�i
This map is for planning ❑
pwposes only and should
not be used where precise
measuremml is required
T11 11 i� TI (19� Sal II /�I Ilu ���s_ is �avn n n n oil�� �� ,��.. v- '!T. PAUL YQ
" sr PAUL
•
1 00
pain
1 Flooding problem areas . Numbers refer to text.
Source: U.S. Department of HUD
MATCH LIMC
s
0
P-
3
• 4
M..r..
WA:MINOTON C�
AI M'ONT
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Water Quality
The water resources in and adjacent to Maplewood area result of glacial
activity, which left lakes and swamps throughout the metropolitan area. The
P
- reservation and protection of surface and groundwater resoUrces is essential,
as these waters are used for recreational, domestic and aesthetic purposes.
The Department of Natural Resources has classified lakes in Maplewood accord-
ing to the most appropriate use. Under the Shoreland Management Classification
System, there are three types of lakes:
1. General Development
Those waters whose shores are presently characterized by industrial
commercial or high density residential development shall be classified
• as General Development.
2. Recreational Development
Those waters whose shores are presently c�harocterized by medium density
residential development with or without limited service oriented commercial
development shall be classified as Recreational Development,
3. Natural Environment
Those waters whose shores are presently characterized by low density,
single family residential development shall be classified as Natural
Environment.
For each of these classifications, standards have been established related to
minimum lot size, the placement of structures on lots, shoreland alterations,
and the placement of roads and parking areas. The classifications assigned to
lakes in Maplewood are illustrated on the following map.
The Ramsey -Washington Metro Watershed District sampled water quality at five
locations in Maplewood in 1977. The stations were chosen to monitor Battle
Creek, the inlet to Beaver Lake, and County Ditch 18. All samples failed to
meet standards established by the Minnesota Pollution- Control Agency in fecal
coliforms, and levels of suspended solids and dissolved oxygen were also in
violation in several locations. _
50
Gin1U(0�7^ OO OO d017
y
v
t
2
This map is for planning
purposes only and snook!
MA be used where precise
measurerte I is required.
�� I LITTLE CANADA
1
41 C01 01
PAUL
0111 %' II tl o .. \\\\A fa
lake classifications
GD General Development
RD Recreational Development
NE" ' 'Natural Environment
"'0
-
Source: Midwest Planning and Research, Inc., 1979
YARN LIN(
M
9
v
+ t _
3M t 1
IF
_Jlr N 1
f
I Y�'+'�LL.....
wASNINOTON C�
NEWPORT
Fecal coliforms are characteristically inhabitants of warmblooded animal
intestines, and are often associated with leaking sanitary sewer lines or
improperly installed on-site sewage disposal systems. Members of the coliform
subgroups may be found in soil, on plants and insects, in all sewage, and in
waters polluted some time in the past. The coliform test is therinc iP al
P
criterion .in the quality of water. and can be indicative of serious. contamination,
A.:.sa,mpling of dissolved oxygen is considered important because it measures the
abil ity of- the water to _support fish and other aquatic I ife. Low levels of
- dissolved oxygen indicate that the ability of the water to support life has been
impaired,
The Watershed District has made several recommendations relative to water
quality monitoring in the area:
1. Continue lake and stream monitoring on a monthly basis during May,
June, September, and October, and weekly during July and August,
leaving the number of stations as the were during the 1977 monitoring
9
year. Continue lake monitoring three times annually during spring, summer
and fol I.
2, Maintain flexibility to prepare for any potential supplemental monitoring
required where degrading discharges are entering the streams.
3. Establish a biota monitoring program, beginning with a qualitative inventory
of the streams now being monitored, with possible future expansions to
quantitative baseline data collection.
4. Observe land use changes affecting the water resources in the District on
a case by case basis to determine their effect on stream and lakeual it in
q Y
the watershed.
5. Examine watershed erosion problems to determine the possibility of using
vegetative and woody plantings to complement engineering methods in
abating existing and potential erosion areas.
6. Incorporate potential recreation and/or open space land uses with erosion
control measures.
Air Quality
Although the Pollution Control Agency has not monitored air quality at
Y any
sites in Maplewood, -air quality sampling was conducted in St. Paul in several
locations outside of Maplewood. Based on this monitoring, it was discovered that
State. standards for particulate levels were violated on severat occasions. it is
expected that the primary sources of particulate levels which may be indicated
are natural sources and the dust generated from construction activities.
52
The major source of air pollution in Maplewood is vehicular traffic. in
this respect, it does not differ greatly from other metropolitan suburbs.
However, the number of major arterials bisecting Maplewood may contribute
to air quality levels that are less than desirable . Any air quality problems
which the CY may -have have, however, hae not been verified by actual
measurements .
Noise
Noise pollution becomes a major concern when a community has, or is adjacent
to airfield facilities, As Maplewood is located at a substantial distance from
any airports, this is not an important 'issue,
Noise generated by traffic has, however, been a problem. Maplewood is
bisected by several major highways and noise levels along these corridors are
apt to be high.
Both the State Highway Department and the Pollution Control Agency encourage
,special land use planning along major highway corridors. Low density residential
development adjacent to such highways is generally discouraged, and when other
tYPP are P
es of development lanned, noise reduction methods such as buffering, con-
structing
on-structing barriers or berms, or planting are recommended . Maplewood has noise
walls on the south side of 1-94, but no plans are underway to construct additional
barriers. The State has placed a moratorium on the construction of additional
noise walls so the effect of these barriers can be studied. Although only the
City can regulate the type of development that occurs adjacent to noise sources,
the State may require Environmental Assessment Worksheets for large-scale
de ve I op me nts .
53
DA
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
June 29, 1981
TOLTZ. KING. DUVALL. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED
2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101
612/292-4400
Kenneth G. Haider, P. E0
Director of Public Works
1902 E. County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Re: Maplewood Comprehensive Sewer Plan
Dear Mr. Haider:
per our request please find enclosed a breakdown per inter -
As p y q
for of theprojected 1990 wastewater flows for the City of
cep
Maplewood. The enclosed information should be included with the
above referenced plane
If you have any questions, please cont act me.
Very truly yours,
TOLTZ KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES) INCORPORATED
Edwin. A. Smith
EAS: d jw
MAPLEWOOD COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN
1990 W A -S TDVATER. FLOW PRO JE CT YON S
In order to pro j ect - the 1990 wastewater flow a basis Tor estimat-
ing- the increase must be established.
The -Metropolitan Council in 1976 projected the population of the
City of Maplewood to be 28.,000 and 34,000 for 1980 and 1990 re- --
spect ively . The 1980 census placed the population for the City
at 26,990, Reducing the projected 1980 and 1990 population pro-
jections
ro-
jections to reflect the census data results in a population pro-
jection for 1990 of 33,000 or a 22.2% increase The -City Master
Plan projects a 1990populat ion of 30'000. However , to ensure
sufficient sewer capacity for 1990 wastewater flows the higher
population figure was used.
For 1980 the total wastewater flow from the City of Maplewood as
billed by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (TAAVCC) was
1497.2 million gallons. Increasing this flow by the same percent-
age as the projected population increase results in a total pro-
jected 1990 wastewater flow of approximately 1829 million gallons.
Wastewater from the City of Maplewood is dischaiUed to the MWCC in-
terceptor system at several locations as well as a few locations
into the City of St. Paul) Oakdale and Woodbury sewer systems, The
major discharges are continuously metered while the minor area
-f lows are estimated based on spot checks and on the number of ser-
vice connections.
In estimating the amount of wastewater flow for 1990 and breaking
it down by discharge area .the undeveloped area was used. Basical-
ly the total increased flow projection of 332 million gallons
(1829.,2-1497.2) was distributed to each discharge area in propor-
tion to the undeveloped area served by that interceptor sewer.
The attached table lists the developed data.
Meter No.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
1990 WASTEWATER FLOW PROJECTIONS
Location
2
Douglas Rd. & Carver Ave.
*3
McKnight Rd. &
Highwood Ave.
**4
Winthrop St, &
Lower Afton Rd.
5
McKnight Rd. &
Larry Ho Drive
7
Winthrop St. &
Margaret St. '
7A (3M)
Howard & 3rd Ave.
8
McKnight Rd. &
Stillwater Ave.
9
Larpenteur Ave.
& Howard
11
Larpenteur Ave.
& Mahfee St.
13
Larpenteur Ave.
& Westminister St,
14
Larpenteur Ave.
& Adolphus St.
15
Larpenteur Ave.
& Rice St.
***25
Beltline Int. at Keller Golf Course
Unmetered
74.0
180.6
1.17
TOTAL
155.8
* out of Service
** Minus meter 19
*** Minus meter 26
1980 Flow M. G.
,J!94. 1990
Increase Projection
M: G: M e G.
(included in -to Woodbury)
58.8
58.8
(included in -to St. Paul)
43.5
11.6
55.1
75.2
1.3
76.5
60.6
14.3
74.9
536.8
3.7
540.5
47.8
34.2
82.0
38.6
10.6
49.2
254.5
60.8
315.3
93.4
10.6
104.0
70.9
5.3
76.2
52.3
8.0
60.3
106.6
74.0
180.6
1.17
38.8
155.8
1497.2
332
1829.2
Resolution Pertaining to Additions to the Plan Update
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan ,Land Planning Act requires local governmental units
to prepare comprehensive plans and submit them to the Metropolitan Council for
review; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has requested additional information for the
Plan Update, and
WHEREAS, these addi ti ons -were adopted by the Ci ty of Maplewood P1 anni ng
Commi ssi on on July 20, 1981, following a public hearing with, required legal notice;
and
WHEREAS, these additions were considered and accepted, but not adopted, by the
City Council on August 6, 1981.
NOW, THEREFORE, does the City Council accept and the Planning Commission adopt
the following additions to the Comprehensive Plan Update:
1. Pages .41-53 of the Planning Inventory, prepared by Midwest Planning and
Research.
2. The information on wastewater flow projections i n - the June 29, 1981
memorandum from Edwin A. Smith of Tol tz, King, Duvall, Anderson and
Associates, Inc.
3. A number 6 is added to page 32 of the Sewer Plan as follows: "6. Require
percolation tests and soil borings before issuing permits."
4. "The City will comply with Mn/DOT rules concerning obstructions to air
navigation."
5. "The Maplewood Transportation Plan, done *by Barton-Aschman in 1979, is
adopted as part of the Plan Update, except that the Plan Update shall
apply wherever a conflict occurs between the two . "
In addition, the Director of Community Development is authorized and directed
to submit the comments in his memorandum of July 7, 1981 and the additions to the
Plan Update to the Chairman of the Metropolitan Council for review under Section
473.175 of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act.
Adopted by the City Council this 6th day of August, 1981:
John Greavu, Mayor
Attest:
Lucille Aurelius, City Clerk
Lester Axdahl , Chairman
Planning Commission
Attest:
Geoff Olson, AICP
Director of Community Development
•5. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Plan Update Additions
Secretary Olson read the notice of public hearing. The proposed additions
are a result of a letter received from the Metropolitan Counci 1.Staff has
included In their memorandum the additions proposed. In addition to the
recommendations in the memorandum, there has been some discussion with the
Parks Commission. Dean Sherburne from the Parks Commission is- present at
the meeting: They have -a trails subcommittee that has been working to
establish a trail plan for the .City. They are requesting it be included
i n the Plan Update,
Dean Sherburne said the Parks and Recreation Commission had prepared a
trail plan. They have compared it to the plan prepared by the Planning
Commission. They are almost identical. He is present to discuss the few
differences in the plans. In addition to the plan, the Parks Commission is
also trying to establish policies and procedures for trails when dealing
with developers who wish to construct a trail in lieu of PAC charges,
They also trying to establish construction standards for trails. . In
the Planning Commission's plan there is a di sti ncti on'.between existing,
proposed, and potential bike routes. They have just existing and proposed.
They hope to obtain the Soo Line railroad right-of-way from St. Paul into
North St. Paul for a pathway if it is vacated. On the Parks plan there
is a distinction between bike routes and bike paths. He presented a plan
for the Commission to review which showed the City Parks, Ramsey County
Parks, existing and proposed bike paths and routes,
Commissioner Fischer asked if the Parks Commission had taken into
consideration the public safety needs for the trails or just recreational
needs.
Mr. Sherburne said they tried to use both.
Chairman Axdahl asked when this proposal would go to the Council.
Secretary Olson said the Parks Commission is hoping that the Planning
Commission will act on the proposal, then it can go to the Council when
the other changes are reviewed at the first meeting in August.
Commissioner Whitcomb asked if there was a list of priorities as to
what trails would be constructed first.
Mr. Sherburne said they are mainly concerned with establishing a trail
plan so they are able to work with developers in the future.
Commissioner Ki shel asked if the trails designated by the Planning
Commission as potential would be considered proposed.
Mr. Sherburne said yes.
Commissioner Fischer said she did not wish to forward a proposed plan
for incorporation into the Plan Update that is not completely accurate..
Commissioner Ki shel asked if the bike trails could be reviewed at a
later meeting and not incorporated into the proposed additions to the
Plan Update.
Secretary Olson said yes.
'
Commissioner Prew moved the P1 anni n Commission -ado t .e.� fol 1. owi ng
Corirn� s _._._-
e of ution and forward it to the City Counci for their cons _erati on-,-.
�s
.
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Land Planning Act requires local
govern-
-to prepare comprehensive plans and submit them to the
mental uniis
-Metropolitan Council for review; and
WHEREAS, the Metropol i tan Council has requested additional inform-
ation for the Plan Update, and
WHEREAS, those additions were adopted by the City of Maplewood
Planning Commission on July 20, 1981, following a publ i -c hearing
with required legal notice; and
WHEREAS, these additions were considered and accepted, but not
adopted, by the City Council on August 6, '19810
NOW, THEREFORE, does the City Council accept and the Planning
Commission adopt the following additions to the Comprehensive Plan
Update:
1. Pages 41-53 of the Planning Inventory, prepared by Midwest
Planning and Research.
2, The information on wastewater flow projections in the June 29,
1981 memorandum from Edwin A. Smith of Tol tz, King, Duvall, Ander-
son and Associates, Inc.
3. A number 6 is added to page 32 of the Sewer Plan as follows: "6 .
Require percolation tests and soil borings before issuing permits.'.'
4. "The City will comply with Mn/DOT rules concerning obstructions
to air navigation".
5. "The MaplewoodTransporati on Plan, done by Barton-Aschman in 1979,
is adopted as part of the Plan Update, except that the Plan Update
shall apply wherever a conflict occurs between the two".
In addition, the Director of Community Development is authorized and
directed to submit the comments in hiss memorandum of July 7, 1981 and
the additions to the- Plan Update to the Chairman of the Metropolitan
Council for review under Section 473.175 of the Metropolitan Land
Planning Act.
Commissioner Ki shel seconded Ayes - all.
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend the
ro osed bi ke t a ' �, an _as r�pa.e`dY..e.s_.an� -- - i.ssa.an..
P p _ r .? ._..P —P
be.- forwarded to the Cit Council after review and recommendation by the
P1 anni n Commission, at the time the Council considers ado tin the Plan
y2date.
Commissioner Ki shel seconded Ayes - al 1
MEMORANDUM
T0: City Manager
FROM: Community Development
SUBJECT: St. Paul Comprehensive Plan
DAT L- July 930 1981
In accordance, wi th the requirements of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, Staff
has reviewed the St. Paul Comprehensive Plan. Copies of pertinent portions of
the St. Paul and Maplewood Plans are enclosed. A copy of the entire St. Paul
Plan is in my office for reference.
St. Paul's Land Use and City wide public systems plans for transportation and
sewer, with the exception of the sewer policy listed below, are consistent with
Mapl ewood' s physical development plans.
Maplewood takes particular exception to the following policy (page 11, Compre-
hensive Sewer Plan):
"Work with the Metropolitan Council and MWCC in devising a sewage treatment
fee structure that takes into account St. Paul's highly diluted sewage.
In conjunction with the Metropolitan Council, MWCC and affected municipalities,
pursue alternatives to the existing cost allocation system that would dis-
tribute
is-
tribute the burden of storm water treatment in an equitable manner along all
contributing communities to lake overf1ows."
Storm water enters the St. Paul system because past administrative and planning
decisions by St. Paul called for the use of combined sewers. It has now become
apparent that this design is no longer acceptable. The City of Maplewood does
not feel the City of St.- Paul is released from the responsibility of those
decisions, simply because circumstances have changed.
The City of Maplewood and developers within the City have spent considerable sums
of money for storm water control. These efforts reduce to a minimum, the down-
stream effects i nSt. Paul. With this in mind Maplewood is opposed to any
suggestion that the MWCC cost allocation system be changed to distribute St.
Paul's financial responsibility to other municipalities.
Finally, in the St. Paul "Plan for Fire and Safety Services", reference is made
to joint operations in the southern portion of Mapl ewood' s "leg" area. The
Maplewood Department of Public Safety was unaware of this proposal, It is
suggested that the appropriate person(s) from the City of St. Paul contact Richard
Schaller, Ma 1 ewood' s Director of Public Safety, to discuss this +opportunity.
p _.
Recommendation
Authorize Staff to forward the above comments to the City of St. Paul.
Enclosures:
1 Maplewood Major Street Plan 2. St., Paul District 2 & 6 Land Use Plans
2. St. Paul Major Street P1 an 3. Maplewood Neighborhood Land Use Plans
mom VV 011ft
I-694
Larpenteur
.. • st 1 •R M� M Q ►Vr.�. �. l�
seem 1 � 8 1 *0 �: M�• bell ► �
.M� —
i
i
..i
I
•• •• Principcgl, Intermediate Arterials
• ?��lUi.tI It... Stillwater Road
.�.. Mojor Arterial �.: �.,"'~-
.�.� Minor Arterial i �.•-�
nr...r Major Collector
Minor Collector e •
Ab
Interchange !
r
Source: Maplewood Transportation Plan, Barton-Aschman, 1979
too
194
oil
- •,t
i
to
!Lower Afton Road
f
Ca am==
a men •esshw
lose x„,.111980....•'• Hi ghwood Ave .
soft
loss
leir• .+ � r— loss
aJ
I _ !
_..L. _
MAPLEWOOD MAJOR STREET PLAN
t
i' MOTS • '+. SIC
7
&OWiFf SOL::
t r
/ 31 2
Y t
at
V
7YLRYLAWL
e
0 W f
PIE<_ c
3- fts
�
Vic.
CAS f
iKL[R o ` X51 f �M
V Y � .., r • ' •. ar �
e +►�ivivflytiNa ? : r.«wEw►Mt
_ �49
«%� fn ` y.
*Was
�.
el
♦. ter` �` = E ]+K`
UNIVERSM
1-14 .�' �- `• _ .r`J v
I
< T
mmff
swumm
•• • � t � GS ��_IMORE �1e
? GRAND49
�i• »
lk
r
• ` t i .� fp � b ��w A�'7d
JEFFERSON� GEOFIGE, f �
O
• &"map"
-!
Principal Arterial
�� -
.•.•...e Intermediate Arterial
..a.r Minor Arterial Level A
Minor Arterial Level B
Coliector
•--••« Designation to be 'Decided
15
Tc be Constructed
ST. PAUL MAJOR STREET PLAN
W
WESTERN HILLS
N MAPLEWOOD W
Lo
W M
V 1
r
,.�•ja L
DODDQ a a
Duo
1111 juD[IFI[
00000000001100 a[
DOO�DO�DDDOD� D a oo�[
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
INDUSTRIAL
GREEN/RECREATIONAL
M- +►
DISTRICT 6 PROPOSED LAND USE
1 6
'ARPENTEUR AVE.
L
'w
i
cz
ST. PAUL (DISTRICT 6)
wvv-estern [J,.*Ills
NEIGHBOR1100D LAPD USE PLAN
W
Ln
_ M
J
C'3
Z
W
DED,!
Z
LAJ
Q
GLADSTONE CC
Q
m
H
Z
3
HILLSIDE
LARRENTEUR AVE .
BEAVER
►o
LAKE
Q
CD
,. f4��1��t •• eeefl��ee ••
VV�WYWW1188�i � ♦ ♦ • •�
r � �. L�QC��. •� �e�e�e�1�1 7
' \ , • ire i•••i c �*
.ecce• _li_�•���
• •Ieee
'!� � i of i•
ad
dtnji
-�LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
MEDIUM
OPEN O
.O..... INDUSTRIAL
PDSSIBLE ECO. DEV./RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT 2 PROPOSED LAND USE
MINNEHAHA AVE. .1
DISTRICT 2
.Saint Paul
.c
flu
Rl�o.
sc �r!
�r
interchange -z- �,.-
princ�
Bearer Lake
NEIGHBORHOOD LAUD USE PLAN
s
z _
� t
c
�m
Sc
Rm
i
v
i
.v
E
O
Sc
MINNEHAHA AVENUE
i
•��os
interchange m -94
r
,i
DISTRICT 2
.Saint Paul
.c
flu
Rl�o.
sc �r!
�r
interchange -z- �,.-
princ�
Bearer Lake
NEIGHBORHOOD LAUD USE PLAN
s
z _
� t
c
�m
Sc
Rm
i
v
i
.v
E
O
Sc
MINNEHAHA AVENUE
i
•��os
interchange m -94
Got
. .+. ••••�.•r• .•. •.f•f•.r••f•• ••• • .� .•. Li I Irl.
tT
�_ Sii::i ••�•.• ' ..•. ���.*•••♦tom• ' • •.� 1
3, 'r• 1
J eft . ;�
+ r
come�• 111 �:R,-..ic..•.IIIII a or collect(
some
ry
gnu%
R
KL.
f
rn
major arterial
sc
.. �. .•.. .. 1
Saint
DISTRICT 2
Hillside Q
NEIGIJBOslllGOD LAI"ID USE PLAti N
major arterial
City of Saint Paul
DISTRICT 2
J,
Gladstone 4
NEIGWBORi{ODD LAIM USE PLAN
N
J M MEOP
. 4 0 �� � r
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Public Works
DATE: July 30, 1981
SUBJECT: HILLWOOD DRIVE - DORLAND ROAD
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 78-10
Attached is the feasibility study for the referenced project.
Staff concurs with the recommendations.
It is recommended the City Council shcedule a public hearing
at 7:00 P.M., September 3, 1981.
attach.
KGH/mn
r
P
MEMORANDUM
Action by Coanoij
TO: CITY MANAGER
Endorse
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS COORDINATOR ,�,
Modif 1 ec�..�.,,„
j
f
DATE: 7-28-81 Re j ectrc _ ..
Date
r.
SUBJECT: Infiltration and Inflow Analysis Grant a.
a:
it
I
i`
c
Studies conducted by the Metropolitan Waste Control
Commission place our community in the category entitled
Potentially Excessive I/I" thus making us eligible
for a Federally funded grant on a "pass through"
arrangement with the MWCC.
More specifically, the grant will be 75/ Federal
funds , 15/ MWCC funds and 10/ 1 ocal - funds . It i s
expected that the I / I Analysis of the Maplewood
Sanitary Sewer System would cost approximately
$95,000.00 resulting in a cost of about $9,500.00
to the City. It should be noted that this analysis
is a prerequisite to any further grants for which the
City may be eligible.
The purpose of the I/I Analysis is to determine if a
"Sewer System Evaluation Survey" is required. This
survey (also grant funded) , could lead to a grant for
"Sewer System Rehabilitation."
The study which placed the City in the "Potentially
Excessive" category estimates that 25.4/ of the
average annual wastewater flow is I/I.
In terms of the 1982 budget, this would amount to
$2.a8, 300.00 that the City pays to treat I/I.
Benefits other than savings in treatment costs would
accrue to the City if the sources of I/I are located
and eliminated. These benefits include:
a) fewer sewer backups due to surcharging
of the mains during periods of heavy
rainfall;
b) diminution of need for relief sewers to be
constructed in those areas where sewer
capacity for development is inadequate due
to I/I.
To: City Manager - 2 - 7_28_81
The Rules and Regulations of the Environmental
Protection Agency govern all phases of the work
to be accomplished with the grant monies. These
rules require that a committee be formed for
purposes of consultant selection using the EPA
selection process.
It is recommended that the Council authorize the
formation of the Consultant Selection Committee
consisting of the Director of Public Works, the
Finance. Director, and the Public Works Coordinator.
It is further recommended that a budget transfer
in the amount of $9,500.00 be authorized from the
sewer contingency fund to fees for service for
purposes 'of fi ananci ng the City's portion of the
study.
WC/mb
KA
dM
r
MEMORANDUM
_ Tp• City Manager Action by
• J
FROM: Assistant City Engineer
DATE: July 29, 19 81 _ • �- .._.�.
SUBJECT: Storm Water Runoff ` ✓ �"''�•
True Value Hardware, Inc.
T.H. 61 and T. H. 36
The True Value Hardware store complex located in the
South East quadrant of the T.H. 61 and T. H. 36 intersection
is experiencing drainage problems on their site. The
Pg
arkin lot on the east side of the building receives
runoff during wet periods from adjacent land and is not
designed to accommodate the volume of runoff experienced.
The water is channeled overland through an earth surfaced
utility easement which results in depositing sediment on
the paved surface of TVH.
The volume of runoff and disposition of debris is claimed
to be a factor in the deterioration of the parking lot sur-
face.
The City, in the past, has cleaned up the debris deposited
.from the erosion on the easement. This operation, however,
does not resolve the problems experienced from the volume
of runoff nor the down stream capacity of the overland flow
facilities to intercept and convey this runoff.
We have -investigated the situation and find the solution
to be more than a maintenance operation. The permanent
solution must consider a public improvement addressing
storm sewer installation.
DJP/mn
;v
WARNER
HARDWARE
]ARNER T&Aiyaw
TELEPHONE (612) 445-2365 • 1570 HIGHWAY 101
July 22, 1981
Mr. Dave Pillatzke
Asst. City Engineer - Cit of Maplewood
City P
Public Works Building
1902 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
HARDWARE, INC.
• SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379
Re: Keller Lake Shopping Center
Dear Mr. Pillatzke2280 Maplewood Drive
,
I am writing to confirm our phone conversation in regard to the
water drainageproblem.alonggg the east side of our property at
the above location.
This water drainage problem is compounded b storm water r
a p y runoff.,
s well as sand and gravel carried by the runoff, comm onto our
from the cit ' g
property y easement, to the east. •The problem is fur-
ther compounded by the lack of fall In the drainage ditch along
g s g
the service road, at the north edge of ourro ert line.
P P y
This water drainage problem becomes a hazardous iceroblem i
the . cold weather month p ' n
s, for pedestrians as well as vehicular
traffic. In warmer weather, the standing water damages the integ-
rity of the sub. rade g g
y g •, which in turn causes rapid deterioration of
the asphalt, and this in turn causes potholes that are also ha-
zardous to pedestrians and vehicles.
Because of the above problems I am requesting that
, g q the City of
inspect nspect the.problem, to determine what can be done to
resolve the water drainage problem.
Mr. Pillatzke, if you or the city have an questions, or need an
y q ons , y
further information on this matter, please do not hesitate to call
me. I am willing to cooperate in any way possible to resolve
this water problem.
Yo truly
Ronald W. Matson
Construction Manager
RWM: smc
CC: R. Kirby H. Paradis
W. Theusch D. Hall
C. walerius
CITY OF-MAi'LEWOOD
IPWIMIltme BICE
:4 CM40424-01
.. This Apptip nun ita 11 to COMMI-low in duolicoa
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE - SECURITIES DIVISION
APPLICATION
FOR APPROVAL OF MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND PROJECT
Date July 23, 1981
To:
Minnesota Departrnent of Commerce
Securities Division
500 Metro Square Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
The governing body of City Of. Maplewood , County of _ Ramsey ,
Minnesota, hereby applies to the Commissioner of. the State of Minnesota, Securities Division of the
Department of Commerce, for approval of this community's proposed municipal Industrial Revenue
Bond Issue, as required by Section 1; Subdivision 7, Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes.
We have entered into preliminary discussions with:
FIRM J—Mont, Inc.
ADDRESS 288 Ea s:t Seventh Street
CITY St. Paul, STATE Minnesota
smote of I, po ;CM Mi nne s-oto
Attorney
J. M. Hartke
Addrm 450 S outhvi ew Blvd,
South St, Paul, MN 55075
N rm of Project Maplewood Cat wash .
This firm is engaged primarily in (nature of busing: Automobile and
Light Truck
The funds received from the sale of the Industrial Revenue Bonds will be used to (general nature of
project: _ construct and equip a car wash bui ld ina
It will be located in City of Maplewood
The total bond issue will be approximately $__ 9 8 2 , 0 0 0
costs now estimated as follows:
Cost item
-Land Acquisition and Site Development
Construction Contracts
Equipment Acquisition and Installation
Architectural and Engineering Fees
Legal Fees
Interest during Construction
Initial Bond Reserve
Contingencies
Bond Discount
Other
to be applied toward payment of
Amount
s__4k44z2,000* Site Development
540,000*
13 0,
000
30,
000
25,000
40,000
25.000
It is presently estimated -that construction will begin on or about October 1
• 19 81 ,
,� and will he completed on or about .,,_ March , 19 82 ,_ When completed, there will be
N approximately 30 new jobs created by the project at an annual payroll of a
282 1 p y approximately
$ . 0 0 0 based upon currently prevailing wages.
The tentative term of the financing is years, commencing
19 '
The following exhibits are furnished with this application and are incorporated herein by reference:
1. An opinion of bond counsel that the. proposal constitutes a project under Minnesota Stat.,
Chapter 474.02,
2. A copy of the city council resolution giving preliminaryapproval for the issuance '
bonds. PP of its revenue
3. A comprehensive statement by the municipality indicating how the project satisfies the public
purpose of Minnesota Stat., Chapter 474.01.
4. A letter of intent to purchase the bond issue or a letter confirming the feasibility
of the project
from a financial standpoint.
5. A statement, -signed by the Mayor, to the effect that upon entering into the revenue agreement,
t,
the information requ i red by Minn. Stat. Sec. 474.01 Subd. 8 will be submitted to the Depart-
ment of Economic Development.
6. A statement signed by the Mayor, that the protect does not include any property ert to be sold or
affixed to or consumed in the production of property for sale, and does not include an housing
9
facility to be rented or used as a permanent residence.
7. A statement signed by the Mayor that a public hearing was conducted pursuant to Minn. Stat.
474.01 Subd. 7b. The statement shall include the date, time and place of the meeting and that
all interested parties were afforded an opportunity to express their views.
8. A copy of the notice of publication of the public hearing.
We, the undersigned, are duly elected representatives ofMinnesota
Y ry a
and solicit your approval of this project at your earliest convenience so that we ma car ' it to final
conclusion.
• Signed by:. (Principal Officers)
This approval shall not be deemed to be an approval by the Commissioner or the state of the
feasibility of the project or the terms of the lease to be executed or the bonds to be issued therefor.
Date of Approval
- Commissioner of Securities
Minnesota Department of Commerce
APPLI CATION/AGREEMENT
FOR TAX EXEMPT
MORTGAGE REVENUE NOTE FINANCING
This Agreement is hereby entered into between the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota, hereinafter called the "City" and J -P -Mont, Inc.
hereinafter called the "applicant".
.
The applicant is requesting financing for a development
devel o ment project anddesires that the City issue notes according to the
terms of the Municipal
pal
Industrial Development Act of 1967 as amended. In ord •
order'for the application
cats on
to be considered by the City, the applicant herebyagrees to a al
9 pay 1 costs
involved in the legal and fiscal review of ther '
p oposed project and all costs
involved in the issuance of said notes to finance theJ
ro'ect,
P
It is further agreed and understood that the
City reserves the
right t
oden any application for financing ng in any stage of the proceedings Prior toadoptin9 the resofution authorizing the issuance of notes.
APPLICANT:
a. Bus 1 nes s Name - J --.Mont, Inc., d/b/a Downto`aner Car Wash
b. Business Address - 288 East 7th Street , St. Paul, , MN
c. Business Form (corporation,
��� _
d. Authorized Representative - Warreri MontP etit
e. Telephone - 222--.0745 C, ne s s-1, .7 3 5 ,r-4 3 8 0 Chome l ,
2. NAME (S) OF MAJORITY STOCKHOLDERS, OFFICERS & DIRECTORS, PARTNERS ,
a. Eli .za'beth- A. Montpetit -,'-TZ4. 5GW stockholder
b. Warren A. Montpetit -- 50% stockholder
co
do
e. peg---,
w A
3. *INCLUDE A PROPERTY LINE MAP
SHOWING -EXACT LOCA ION OF PROPERTY, NAMES OF
ADJACENT STREETS, AND DIMENSIONS OF PROPERTY,
4, NATURE OF BUSINESS
a. Briefly describe the project a.proposal: Construct and equip p an
automobile and 1. ht truck washin facility
' (OVER)
ld
b. Is the project associated with an existing Maplewood Business?
9 P ess.
Yes No x If yes: Relocation Expansion
Re h abi l i to t -----
{ ion
r
5. AMOUNT OF CITY FINANCING BEING REQUESTED:98 2
� ,000
6. PURPOSE OF REQUESTED FINANCING:
a. Bus i ness purpose to be served.
b. Public purpose to be served.
7. BUSINESS PROFILE,
a. Number of employees in Maplewood:
Full Time Part Ti m.
Before this project none none
After this project 20 15
b. Projected annual sales: 21290,000-000
.
. $
c. Projected annual payroll:. 282','000'.00
8. NAMES OF:
a. Financial consultant for the business: James Tilsner
b. Legal counsel for the business: Jerrold M. Har tke
c. Corporate counsel : Jerrold M. ' H-artke
9. WHAT IS YOUR TARGET DATE FOR:
a. Construction start: November 1, -1981
. .
b. Construction completion: Marchi. 1, 19-82
Warren A, Montpetit
Name of pp 1 i cant
i gnature of uthor.' a epresentati ve
Title
Ju lir 23, 19 81
Date
,the following items must be submitted w.ith this application to the Community Development
Department:
1. A $500.00 fi 1 i ng fee •
2. A resolution setting a hearing date .
3. An application to the Commissioner -of Securities fora approval of Municipal
I pp -
Industrial Revenue Bond project
If you have any questions on items 2 or 3 call the Cit Clerk, -
City k, Lucille Aurelius, 770 4.
August 6, 1981
STAFF REPORT
To: City Manager Barry Evans
From: Chief of Police R. W. Schaller
Subject: Sale of Used Police Sedans
We placed two used 1978 Buick LeSabre four -door sedans for bidding at
Gopher Auto Salvage Pool. These vehicles each have approximately 100,000
miles on their speedometers. The following bids were received:
Vehicle ID #4N69X9H570336
A-1 Auto Parts $1,050.00
Jay Schober 747,77
Atlas Auto Parts 697.31
Greg Schneller 747.71
Vehicle ID #4N69X9H570493
A-1 Auto Parts $1,050.00
Jay Schober 747.77
Atlas Auto Parts 747.71
Edward Ellsworth 350.75
Staff recommends A-1 Auto Parts' bids on each unit of $1,050. We will have to
pay the usual $20 seller's fee and approximately $18 for newspaper ads.
RWS:js
cc Deputy Chief Hagen
Lieutenant Cusick
Dan Faust
City Clerk✓
Art's Towing
Vehicle File