HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981 04-16 City Council PacketAGENDA
R
Maplewood City Council
7:00 P.M., Thursday, April 16, 1981
Municipal Administration Building
Meeting 81 -8
(A) CALL TO ORDER
(B) ROLL CALL
{C} APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes 81 -5 (March 5 )
(D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA
(E) CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by
the City Council and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below.
There will be no separate discussion on these items If discussion is de-
sired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be con -
sidered separately.
10 Accounts Payable.
2. Property Division,
3. Time Extension: Linwood Heights
. 4. Time Extension: Beaver Lake Hills
5. Time Extension: Crestview 3rd Addition
60 "Opticom ": Minnehaha and Century Avenues
7, Watermain Agreement: Van Dyke Street
8. Rehearing Request: Revenue Note Atlantic and Highway 36
(F} _ PUBLIC HEARINGS
1, Preliminary Plat and Street Vacation: Carsgrove's Meadows (7:00)
2. Street and Alley Vacations: Conners and_ Hazel St. (Wessin) (7:15)
3.
4.
Revenue Note: Toyota (7:30)_,____
Board of Appeals and Adjustments
a. Minutes
B
(G) AWARD OF BTDS
None.
Variance: Pfiy1is Court (Sonnen) (7:45)_
(H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS
10 Code Amendment: Maximum Garage Area (2nd Reading)
2!
Publ is ITn rovement Petition: English Street North of Kohlman Avenue
P
r�
(I) VISITOR PRESENTATION
(J) NEW BUSINESS
1 320 Contract for 1981 -82
2. Special Renewal 1997 White Bear Avenue (Barnhill)
3. Plan Update
4. HRA Annual Report
5. Final Payment: Maryland Avenue Project 77-12
6. 1981 Street Overlay Program
7. Border Streets wi th North St, Pau
8. Deputy Regi Off Part Time Empl
9. Letter of Intent: Emergency Medi Rad System
(K) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1.
2•
3
4
5.
6
7.
8.
90
10t
(L} ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
(M) ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:30 P.M., Thursday, March 5, 1981
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 81-5
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Build-
ing, and was called to order at 7:04 P.M. by Mayor Greavu.
B. ROLL CALL
John C. Greavu, Mayor Present
Norman G. Anderson, Councilman Present
Gary W. Bastian, Councilman Present
Frances L. Juker, Councilperson Absent
Earl L. Nelson, Councilman Present
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended:
1. Frost Avenue
2. Resolution
3. Letter MDOT
4. Call from Mrs. Drake - Watershed
5. Budget Transfer
6. Council Minutes
Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all.
E. CONSENT AGENDA
Council removed Item E-3 to become Item J-8.
Councilman Nelson moved, seconded by Mayor Greavu, Ayes - all, to approve the Consent
Agenda as recommended.
1. Accounts Payable
Approved the accounts (Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses, Check No. 005480 through
Check No. 005528 - $95,148.16; Check No. 009270 through Check No. 009458 - $113,434.06;
Part II - Payroll Check No. 26985 through Check No. 27110; $51,877.53) in the amount
of $260,459.75.
2. Feasibility Study: Adolphus Sanitary Sewer
Resolution. No. 81-3-31
WHEREAS, it is proposed to replace the Adolphus Trunk Line Sanitary Sewers and
to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement,
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, chapter 429;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that
the proposed improvement be referred to the City Engineer for study and that he is
- 1 - 3/5
instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council
in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to
whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement,
and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended.
4. Time Extension.: 3M Company - Temporary Trailer
Approved request of 3M Company for renewal of a temporary permit to use a mobile
home as a temporary office for a car pool operation, subject to compliance with all
building codes.
5. Change Order: Fire Station - East County Line No. 2
Resolution 81-3-32
RESOLVED by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that change order number
3 to the contract for construction of East County Line No. 2 Fire Station in the
amount of $950.00 be and hereby is in all things approved.
6. 1981 Contract: Environmental Health Services
Approved the 1981 contract between Ramsey County and Maplewood for Environmental
Health Services.
7. Budget Transfer - Paramedics
Authorized a budget transfer for an increase in revenues and expenditures within
the 1981 paramedic budget in the amount of $3,460.
8. Budget Transfer - Cable Communications Commission
Authorized a budget transfer of $1,000 from the General Fund Contingency account
to finance Maplewood's portion of the initial costs for the Ramsey Washington Counties
Suburban Communications Commission.
F. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Revenue Note: Maplewood Dental Specialties
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a request
from Maplewood Dental Clinic for a industrial Development Revenue Note to construct
a 3,000 square foot dental clinic to be located on Cope Avenue between White
Bear Avenue and Flandrau Street. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in
order and noted the dates of publication.
b. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
c. Director of Community Development presented the following Planning Commission
recommendation:
"Commissioner Howard moved that the Planning Commission recommend to the City
Council preliminary approval of the tax exempt mortgage revenue note financing
in the amount of $300,000 based on the staff's analysis. Approval is subject
to:
- 2• - 3/5
1. Construction must begin within one year of preliminary approval.
2. Approval of a special exception by the City Council and approval of site
and building design plans by the Community Design Review Board.
Commissioner Kishel seconded. Ayes - all."
d. Mr. Dick Nordlurd, Vice President First Corporate Services, Inc., spoke on
behalf of the proposal.
e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard.
g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
h. Councilman Nelson moved to approve the Industrial Revenue Note as requested
by Maplewood Dental Specialties subject to the staff and Planning Commission
recommendations and introduced the following resolution and moved its adoatior::
80 - 3 -33
RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A
COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT
PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT
AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION
FOR APPROVAL OF SAID PROJECT TO THE
COMMISSICNER OF SECURITIES OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF
NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS
IN CONNECTION WITH SAID PROJECT
WHEREAS,
(a) The purpose of Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, known as the Minnesota
Municipal Industrial Development Act (the "Act") as found and determined by the
legislature is to promote the welfare of the state by the active attraction and
encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to
prevent so far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas
of chronic unemployment;
(b) Factors necessitating the active promotion and development of economic-
ally sound industry and commerce are the increasing concentration of population
in the metropolitan areas and the rapidly rising increase in the amount and cost
of governmental services required to meet the needs of the increased population
and the need for development of land use which will provide an adequate tax base
to finance these increased costs and access to employment opportunities for such
population;
(c) The City Council of the City of Maplewood ("the City") has received
from Maplewood Dental Specialties, a Minnesota general partnership (the "Company")
a proposal that the City assist in financing a Project hereinafter described,
through the issuance of a•Revenue Bond or Bonds or a Revenue Note or Notes herein-
after referred to in this resolution as "Revenue Bonds" pursuant to the Act;
- 3 - 1/5
(d) The City desires to facilitate the selective development of the community,
retain and improve the tax base and help to provide the range of services and
employment opportunities required by the population; and the Project will assist
the City in achieving those objectives. The Project will help to increase assessed
valuation of the City and help maintain a positive relationship between assessed
valuation and debt and enhance the image and reputation of the community;
(e) Company is currently engaged in the business of providing dental services.
The Project to be financed by the Revenue Bonds is a dental clinic facility to
be located in the City and possibly leased to various parties and consists of
the acquisition of land and the construction of buildings and improvements thereon
and the installation of equipment therein, and will result in the employment
of 13 additional persons to work within the new facilities;
(f) The City has been advised by representatives of Company that conventional,
commercial financing to pay the capital cost of the Project is available only
on a limited basis and at such Nigh costs of borrowing that the economic feasibil-
ity of operating the Project would be significantly reduced, but Company has
also advised this Council that with the aid of municipal financing, and its resulting
low borrowing cost, the Project is economically more feasible;
(g) Purusant to a resolution of the City Council adopted on February 5,
1981, a public hearing on the Project was held on March 5, 1981, after notice
was published, and materials made available for public inspection at the City
Hall, all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b at
which public hearing all those appearing who so desired to speak were heard;
(h) No public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial
interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly
benefit financially from the Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The Council hereby gives preliminary approval to the proposal of Company
that the City undertake the Project pursuant to the Minnesota Municipal Industrial
Development Act (Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes), consisting of the acquisition,
construction and equipping of facilities within the City pursuant to Company's
specifications suitable for the operations described above and to a revenue agree-
ment between the City and Company upon such terms and conditions with provisions
for revision from time to time as necessary, so as to produce income and revenues
sufficient to pay, when due, the principal of and interest on the Revenue Bonds
in the total principal amount of approximately $300,000 to be issued pursuant
to the Act to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project;
and the agreement may also provide for the entire interest of Company therein
to be mortagaged to the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds; and the City hereby
undertakes preliminarily to issue its Revenue Bonds in accordancewith such terms
and conditions.
2. On the basis of information available to this Council it appears, and
the Council hereby finds, that the Project constitutes properties, real and personal,
used or useful in connection with one or more revenue producing enterprises engaged
in any business within the meaning of Subdivision la of Section 474.02 of the
Act; that the Project furthers the purposes stated in Section 474.01, Minnesota
Statutes; that the availability of the financing under the Act and willingness
of the City to furnish such financing will be a substantial inducement to Company
to undertake the Project, and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken,
will be to encourage the development of economically sound industry and commerce,
to assist in the prevention of the emergence of blighted and marginal land, to
A I/S
help prevent the movement of talented and educated persons out of the state and
to areas within the State where their services may riot be as effectively used,
to promote more intensive development and use of land within the City and eventually
to increase the tax base of the community;
3. The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by the City subject
to the approval of the Project by the Commissioner of Securities, and subject
to final approval by this Council, Company, and the purchaser fo the Revenue
Bonds as to the ultimate details of the financing of the Project;
4. Tn accordance wtih Subdivision 7a of Section 474.01 Minnesota Statutes,
the Mayor of the City is hereby authorized and directed to submit the proposal
for the Project to the Commissioner of Securities, requesting her approval, and
other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide
the Commissioner with such preliminary information as she may require;
5. Company has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all costs
incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project whether
or not the Project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by the
Commissioner will be paid by Company;
6. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel,
and First Corporate Services, inc., are authorized to assist in the preparation
and review of necessary documents relating to the Project, to consult with the
City Attorney, Company and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the maturities,
interest rates and other terms and provisions of the Revenue Bonds and as to
the convenants and other provisions of the necessary documents and to submit
such documents to the Council for final approval;
7. Nothing in this resolution or in the documents prepared pursuant hereto
shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Project other than
the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this
purpose. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance,
legal or equitable, upon any property or funds of the City except the revenue
and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall the City be subject to
any liability thereon. The holder of the Revenue Bonds shall never have the
right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the outstanding
principal on the Revenue Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment
thereof against any property of the City. The Revenue Bonds shall recite in
substance that the Revenue Bonds, including interest thereon, is payable solely
from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof. The Revenue Bonds
shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional
or statuatory limitation;
8. in anticipation of the approval by the Commissioner of Securities and
the issuance of the Revenue Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Project,
and in order that completion of the Project will not be unduly delayed when approved,
Company is hereby authorized to make such expenditures and advances toward payment
of that portion of the costs of the Project to be financed from the proceeds
of the Revenue Bonds as Company considers necessary, including the use of interim,
short-term financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Revenue
Bonds if and when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the
City.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu.
Ayes - all.
- 5 - 3/5
K. COUNCIL PRESENTATION
1. Frost Avenue
a. Councilman Anderson questioned what steps would be necessary to finish Frost
Avenue to White Bear Avenue.
b. No action taken.
2. Council Minutes
a. Councilman Anderson stated when the Council makes a motior it should be complete
and explicit.
F. PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued)
2. Preliminary Plat: Maple Park Shores - 7:15 P.M.
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request
of Rolling Green Properties, Inc. for preliminary plat approval for Maple Park
Shores south of Cope Avenue, west of Kennard Street. The Clerk stated the public
hearing notice was in order and noted the dates of publication.
b. Manager Evans presented the staff 'report.
C. Vice Chairman Duane Prew :resented the following Planning Commission recommend-
ation.:
"Commissioner Ellefson moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council
approval of the preliminary plat located at Cope Avenue and Kennard Street subject
to the condition that the final plat shall not be approved unitl:
1. The City Attorney has approved the bylaws and rules of the proposed homeowner's
association to assure that all common areas will be maintained;
2. A signed developers agreement for the construction of utilities through the
site and enlargement of the existing ponding facility is submitted and approved
by the Director of Public Works;
3. An easement over Outlot A shall be dedicated to the City for drainage and
utility purposes on the final plat.
Commissioner Sletten seconded. Ayes - all."
d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard.
f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
g. Councilman Anderson moved to approve the preliminary plat of Maple Park Shores
subject to the condition that the final plat shall not be approved until:
1. The City Attorney has approved the bylaws and rules of the proposed homeowner's
association to assure that all common areas will be maintained;
2. A signed developers agreement for the construction of utilities through the
- 6 - 3/5
site and enlargement of the existing ponding facility is submitted and approved
by the Director of Public Works;
3. An easement over Outlot A shall be dedicated to the City for drainage and
utility purposes on the final plat.
Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all.
L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Budget Transfer
a. Manager Evans requested Council authorize a budget transfer of $1,000 from
Account 101-161-4910 (Contingency Fund) to Account 101-115-4730 (Building Improve-
ments) to install dedicated computer designed electrical wall outlets within
the Public Safety Area. The electrical work is necessary before the automated
police record system can begin.
b. Mayor Greavu moved to authorize the budget transfer of $1,000 from account
101-161-4910 to account 101-115-4730 as aresented.
Seconded by Councilman. Nelson. Ayes - all.
F. PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued)
3. Street Vacation: Hawthorne Avenue (Cave) - 7:30 P.M.
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a request
of Samuel Cave to vacate a portion of Hawthorne Avenue. The Clerk stated the
hearing notice was in order and noted the dates of publication.
b. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
C. Vice Chairman Duane Prew presented the following Planning Commission recom-
mendation:
"Commissioner Kishel moved approval of the vacation of that portion of Hawthorne
Avenue from the west line of the Century East Apartment property to Ferndale
'Street, except that part shown on the preliminary plat for street use and except
that 20 foot part planned for bike trail to the Century East Apartments.
Approval is based on the finding that such right-of-way has no public purpose and
is in the interest of the City to vacate.
Commissioner Sherburne seconded. Ayes all."
d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard.
f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
g. Councilman Nelson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
81-3-34
'WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section. 412.851,
thereof, the Maplewood City Council, upon petition of a majority of the owners
- 7 - 3/5
of the land abutting Hawthorne Avenue, proposed to be vacated, and after a public
hearing preceeded by two (2) weeks published and posted notice, proposes the
vacatior of the following described Hawthorne Avenue from the west line of the
Century East Apartment property to Ferndale Street, except that part shown or.
the preliminary plat for street use to wit:
PROPERTY AFFECTED BY THE STREET VACATION:
Century East Outlot A, Lots 1 — 7, Block 2, Myhra Addition and the adjacent property
North.of Hawthorne Avenue described as follows:
Unplatted Lands
Ex W 483 ft & ex N 435 ft of S 795.87 ft of SE 1/4 lying N of
Myhra Add (subj to Rds & Esmts) in Section 24, Township 29, Range 22
W 483 ft of SE 1/4 of SE 1/4 lying N of Myhra Add (subj to Rd & esmts) in
Section 24, Township 29, Range 22
WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council finds that the vacation of the above
described street and alley are in the interest of the public due to changing
lard uses and obsolete platting;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council, Ramsey County, Minnesota,
that the above described Hawthorne Avenue be and hereby are, vacated and the
City Clerk is hereby directed to prepare a notice of completion, of the proceedings
pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851 thereof, and
shall cause the same to be presented to the County Auditor for entry upon his
transfer records and the same shall be thereafter filed with the Ramsey County
Recorder, subject to the City retaining a 20 foot wide pedestrian and bike trail
easement along the southerly 20 feet of that portion of Hawthorne Avenue located
between vacated Farrell Street and the west lot line of the Century East Apartment
property.
Seconded by Mayor- Greavu. Ayes — all.
4. Critical Area Plan and Regulations — 7:45 P.M.
a. Mayor Greavu stated this hearing was continued from the February 5, 1981
meeting.
b. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
C. Vice Chairman Duane Prew presented the following Planning Commission recom—
mendation:
"Commissioner Kishel moved that the Planning Commission recommend to the City
Council adoption of the proposed revisions to the Critical Area Plan and Regulations.
Commissioner Fischer seconded. Ayes — 10 Abstained — 1."
d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard.
f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
g. Councilman Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
81 - 3 - 36
WHEREAS, certain areas of the Mississippi River Corridor were designated a
critical area under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 116G (1978) pursuant to Executive
Order No. 130, effective November 23, 1976, and continued pursuant to Executive
Order No. 79-19, effective April 11, 1979; and
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood (the "City") has planning and regulatory
authority over development activities within the designated critical area; and
WHEREAS, the City's proposed plan and regulations for the area have been
submitted to the Metropolitan Council pursuant to Section D. 2. of the Standards
and Guidelines. The Metropolitan Council has completed its review and has forwarded
its comments on the City's Plan and Regulations to the EQB; and
WHEREAS, on March 1, 1979, the Maplewood City Council gave second reading
and final adoption to the Critical Area Plan and regulations, subject to Environ-
mental Quality Board (EQB) approval; and
WHEREAS, revisions were requested by the EQB; and
WHEREAS, City Staff proposed revisions to the Plan and Regulations as request-
ed by the EQB; and
WHEREAS, on September 18, 1981, the EQ B approved the proposed Plan. and Reg-
ulations, as revised, subject to Maplewood City Council approval of the revisions;
and
WHEREAS, the Maplewood Planning Commission recommended approval of the pro-
posed revisions on January 5, 1981; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held with legal notice on February 5, 1981
and continued to March 5, 1981;
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, that the Maplewood
Critical Area Plan, as revised is hereby approved.
Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes - all.
G. AWARD OF BIDS
None._
H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Battle Creek Improvements
a. City Attorney Don Lais reported on the public hearing regarding the improvement
of Battle Creek and the assessments.
b. Council directed the City Attorney to send a letter to the Ramsey Watershed
District pointing out the many problems and concerns that Maplewood has. The
letter should be forwarded to the Elected Representatives of the district also.
2. Storm Water Run Off
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report and recommended Council authorize
concerted 'Legal action with any of the other suburbs who wish to proceed with
litigation against the Met Council for decreasing St. Paul's share of the sewer
charges and increasing the suburbs.
b. Councilman Bastian authorized staff to proceed with appropriate legal action
as recommended.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
Councilman Bastian moved to suspend the Rules of Procedures and discuss Item
J-1 at this time.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
J. NEW BUSINESS
1. Special Exception - Home Occupation - 1772 Ruth Street
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report recommending approval of the proposed
home occupation for a custom drapery and decorating business, subject to the
following conditions:
1. The applicant shall apply for a renewal of the home occupation permit after
on year. If there have been no complaints the permit may be renewed.
2. Compliance with the criteria outlined in the enlcosed Planning Commission
Subcommittee report.
b. Vice Chairman Duane Prew presented the following Planning Commission recom-
mendation:
"Commissioner Ellefson moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council
approval of the proposed home occupation for a custom drapery and decorating
business at 1772 Ruth Street, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall apply for a renewal of the home occupation permit after one
year. If there have been no complaints the permit may be renewed.
2. Compliance with the criteria outlined in the Planning Commission Subcommittee
report.
Commissioner Fischer seconded. Ayes all."
C. Mrs. Sandra Anderson, 1772 No. Ruth Street, the applicant, spoke on behalf of
the proposal.
d. Councilman Bastian moved to approve the home occupation for a custom drapery and
decorating business at 1772 Ruth Street, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall apply for a renewal of the home occupation permit after one
year;
2. The Council may renew the permit after one year, if there are no complaints;
3. Applicant comply with the criteria on home occupation as outlined in the Plan-
ning Commission subcommittee report.
- 10 - 3/5
0
Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all
I. VISTTOR�PRESENTATION
1. Richard Schreier, 2125 Desoto Street
a. Mr. Schreier, 2125 Desoto Street, stated his reasons as a citizen of Maplewood
why the Council should not appeal the court's decision regarding the lawsuit he had
won against the City.
b. No action taker..
2. Plan Amendment: Ferndale Street
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
b. Vice Chairman Duane Prew presented the following Planning Commission recommend-
ation:
"Commissioner Fischer moved to recommend that the line between the LSC and RL be moved
to the west so it runs down the rear property line of the lots on the west side of
Ferndale Street, to reflect:
1. The existing housing land use pattern,
2. The existing R-1 zoning, and
3. The expressed wishes of the owners of the lots.
Commissioner Pellish seconded. Ayes - all."
C. Mr. Bernard Mehr, Ferndale Street, requested his lot remain residential.
d. Councilman Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
81 - 3 - 37
WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council and the Maplewood Planning Commission have
prepared and adopted a Comprehensive Community Plan in compliance with the requirements
of Section 462.355 of the State Planning Enabling Legislation; and
WHEREAS, said Section 462.355 provides for subsequent amendment of said Compre-
hensive Plan which reflect changed conditions; and
WHEREAS, the Maplewood Planning Commission has conducted the required public
hearing and has given consideration to all evidence and testimony submitted at such
hearing held or. February 23, 1981 and has adopted said amendment and forwarded said
amendment to the City Council for.certification; and
WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council has reviewed said amendment;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL hereby adopts
and amends the Comprehensive Plan for Maplewood.
Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes - all.
e. Council directed staff to notify the Ramsey -Washington Watershed District of the
Plan Amendment.
3. Minnesota Star Cities Program
a. Director of Community Development Olson presented the staff report.
b. Councilman Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
81 -3-38
BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD wishes to participate in the Minnesota
Department of Economic Development Star Cities Program. We realize that the program
calls for hard work and a lot of effort on our part. We accept this challenge. Our
city looks forward to this opportunity to shape our economic future.
The program calls for the formation of an economic development commission or
local department corporation in an advisory capacity to the local unit of government.
During the initial organizational stage, a community coordinator has been appointed.
The charge of the coordinator will be to insure that the community meets all requirements
of the Star Cities Program. The coordinator will be the main contact person between
MDED and our community.
Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all.
4. Water Systems Study.
a., Director of Public Works Bittner presented the staff report.
b. Councilman Nelson moved to proceed to engage the firm of Short Elliott Hendrickson,
Inc. to analyze the cost effectiveness of providing potable water supply under out
current retail agreements.
Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes - Councilmen Anderson, Bastian and Nelson.
Nays - Mayor Greavu.
5. Maplewood Lions - Lioness - Bingo
a. Manager Evans stated the North Maplewood Lions and Lioness have requested that
the City Council consider revising the City Bingo Ordinance to permit four occasions
per week rather than the present permitted two per week. The State Statute, 349.17,
Subd. 3(1), has been revised and allows four instead of the previous limit of two
times per week as it was previously.
b. Councilman Bastian moved to table this item J-5 until the May 21, 1981 meeting
for further information.
Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all.
6. Warren Carlson - Beam Avenue Property
a. Manager Evans presented a letter from Warren S. Carlson, Housing Development Assoc-
iates, who requested permission to purchase City owned property extending between
Beam Avenue and Radatz Avenue located one half block east of White Bear Avenue. He
wishes to combine that lot with the lot to the east for the intention of developing
24 units of townhouses.
b. No action taken.
7. Richard Kostohryz - Polling Place
a. Manager Evans presented a letter from Representative Richard Kostohryz stating
he has received complaints from Precinct 3 residents regarding the stairways that
have to be climbed in order to vote. Precinct 3 is the Municipal Building and voting
is on the top floor.
b. Council stated there are several items they would like to discuss with Mr. Kostohryz
and instructed staff to see when he was available to meet with the Council.
8. Feasibility Report - McKnight Road Improvement 78-19
a. Director of Public Works Bittner presented the staff report.
b. Councilman Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
81-3-39
WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve McKnight Road between Larpenteur Avenue and
Maryland Avenue by the construction of watermain and adjunct facilities and to assess
the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA,
that the proposed improvement be referred to the City Engineer for study and that
he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council
in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to
whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improve-
ment, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS (continued)
2. Resolution: Maplewood Firefighters
.a. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
81 - 3 - 40
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood recognizes the importance of maintaining a
financially sound retirement and disability benefit program for its volunteer fire-
fighters through the firefighters' relief association; and
WHEREAS, the City recognizes that the sole purpose of the fire state aid made
available under Minnesota Statutes 69.011 through 69.051 is to provide a portion of
the funds necessary to support the various firefighters relief associations which
exist within the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, allocation of a portion or all of the fire state aid to purposes other
than now mandated may jeopardize the associations' financial ability to maintain_ and
improve pension and other benefit levels which are deemed necessary or desirous by
the City to attract and retain qualified volunteer firefighters;
;NOW, THEREFORE, BE 'IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Maplewood is
opposed to any legislation which would alter or eliminate the exclusive allocation
of the fire state aid now provided for in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 69.011 through
69.051; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to the officers
of the Minnesota League of Cities and to each of the persons who represent the citizens
of Maplewood in the Minnesota State Legislature.
Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes — all.
3. Letter from Minnesota D.C.T.
a. Mayor Greavu stated he had received a letter from the District Engineer Minnesota
Department of Transportation indicating that they agreed with the City that traffic
signals are justified at the south intersection of Highway I-94 and McKnight Road.
They anticipate letting of the project in early 1982.
Councilman Bastian wished to take this opportunity to wish Bill Bittner well in his new
position and to •thank him for his excellent services to the City.
M. ADJOURNMENT
9:44 P.M.
City Clerk
— 14 — 3/5
o
:Ifs ` CF 'A L wOCC A L C C U N T S f A Y A ;3 c DA 3 E C4 -15 -81 PAGE, 1
A 1 M A t4 T aP L t- 0 ,13 E
fl� E29 1 , 3 G3, 43 MII STATE TEASUREk - •
MINI -AUD IT E FUNDS r
aC� ?^ 15,iL NA TL kEG1STnY CF E M T F - ES9 SE�:VIC
RECERTIFICATION -EMT
00501 1fb 8a51 Nw it -NN STATc T�EA_UR;:n STATE 0/i FEES_ + P4 Y AF L -.._.. x
t3
flC5b32
2, 604* 07
M:i °iN STATE. TR.EASUFcER
OE F0SiTS•CE UTY F'L GI ST•
D 3 5 1 .,
ly. ::
KAh,SE.Y CO �:L OF GIST
GNTY F' %S SAYA�� f,
r
G� 3
31 C5
� �
-
'GST;�AST_R
EFAIC _X
005E3
2 0 .0 2,o 74
STATE T�E St;,TAX
jU Ct-4AK G�. TAX s�h 3
- --__ -
005643
x+
3,37.43
MN STATE TKiASUREn-EA
ANO- E F U N 0
flfl5 635
y fl . 43; G
kAHS Y COUNTY CIVIL. 3EF
T AVER + T #rING _ _...
flC" 45
�b
1,217.5
_
MINN STATE TR£ASUF*.
0 0 5 E3E
16• �: G
METRE A `A MGT AS SUC
T AvEL + T :i� ��ING
0 0 56 37
0056
113.5i�
�,�.98.55
MINN STATE Tr�EASUR�K
MI NN STATE TKEA5U�`ER
STATE 0/U F EIS SAY A te _
E:7
.� f
DEPOSITS- CEPUTY GIST•
D 3 5 1 .,
ly. ::
KAh,SE.Y CO �:L OF GIST
GNTY F' %S SAYA�� f,
r
005 640
2,��+5. C0
Mc i�A,,TE CCNTR06im COM4
S.A.C. fAYAPLE
ANC - F E F U N 0
_ t
G i
fl ., E �+
fl fl 5b42
lE. flu
1 767. 2
,
A hSEY t�JUNTY CIVI-�. CEF
SIN STATE T�tASUREn -;'EFA
TF. AV E f T AiNIh G
CUn;TnIaUTiOhS, fEM A
005643
x+
3,37.43
MN STATE TKiASUREn-EA
i
�- •Q.R.A. CED PAYA3�E
�1N 0- CCNTm. BU T i pNS, E
flG '5644
-�
7,731.23
- M� c = F -f�- ACA
MN STATE T�c� AISU�� �
� � '"AYA3L^
r, E.F. A. GED r _ r1
ANC -00N' kIBLTl0 ;:E�A I
flC" 45
�b
1,217.5
_
MINN STATE TR£ASUF*.
E
„ " �FUTY GIS T
1.:.f3S1TS -0•.. � ~ � � ; .
pG5 4E
OC�b 4T
181.2;:
111. too
AY -- �- , ^
G' E A ►� E'L_CTn 1. ♦NC
MiirN STMT E T
A h NANCE M� TE�I AiS
M T�.
STATE 0/L S=EES FAY A
\
005E48
5 •
2 538.17
�
!INN �7ATE TREASUF :J
CEf0SiTS- CEFUTY EGIST•
E
CITY OF
CHE CK
M W00C
A M C U N T
A C G 0 U N T S F A Y A 3 E
C A I M T
CAT E C4 -16 -81 AG� 2
a C F P O S E
0 C5E49
10.00
MINN STATE TREASURER
STATE 0/L FEES FAYA?L
0 05 E5 0
005E51
143o 30
1,E85.50
G0 VT i F: N1 N S V +CE
1 STATE TvE A,,
T t TRA Its I NG
OFFOSITS-OEFUTY ?E GIST.
005E52
144.00
MINN STATE TREASURER
STATE D/L FEES FAYA3L Z-
L05653
o c E '�
n 1 �5• jc:
1 '�
CUE FOCCS
M N M 1 % 1 NG f M F C CO
SUFPLiES, F%Rl0GRN�
��J ��" �.1 i S � .`._ QUi P M ,_N T
0:",. E55
c, 142.25
KINN STAT- TR ASUFC�f,
CEFOSI TS- C 'z PUT Y FE GIST.
005655
0 05 t57
9.4 �j
15.00
P-14NN STATE TNEA'SUREF
GGVT TFAINING SEPVIG
STATE C/L FEE FAYA L E _ _
TF. AV.Ef t Ttl: 1I�•�G
0i'S65 a
12, 772.58
MN STATE TREASUREF -FICA
P ccFAID EXPENSE
ANC - F.I.C. A. PAYA
0i�:65
1E �2' 9A. 7
NI:.LCFEST MIDA1 = I
FTC INCOME TAX FAY A�i
0 C565u
0 J5 0 61
5 ,72ca.99
3220 09
STATE OF MN
WI SCChSI I OPT CF EVEhUE
MI NN INCCME TAX A Y1� i_
Mi tih - MCCFE TAX A Y 8 E
0 C5 60?
313.::0
ME. Tk G bUPER V1 S CRY ASSOC
UN I C DUES PAY A?LE
0 05 c63
289.53
AFSCME #.00AL 2.725
UNION CU= SAYA3L,E
ANC -FAIR SHARE FEES SHY
flu5664
005665
lye* u0
5 944 5.00
k OSEMA KAN;'
CITY t CTY C4ECIT UNION
WAGE. DECUCT CNS PA YA Ef
CFEDIT UNION - DEC.i PAYA
0 56E.b
64* 82
iCMA E TIRLMENT CCFP
DE FEF ED Ct� !F MAYA $;,E
L0i667
G C566 E
2 X09 03
c)5 .5u
MN STATE RETIREMENT SYST
MN SENEFiT ASSCC
OFFS R=,EC COME PAS 9�E
MBA INS FAYAq
05cb9
3,34�.0C'
MINK STATE TRcASUFcEFc
DEFOSITc- CEPUTYE
C u5E70
134.50
AT
MINN STE TR ASUF ER
STATE D/L FEES FAY AP;
a U � S F A Y A 3 L OATS �� -gib 3
.� ` �1 �'A0=
,Y O F �.p .� � H OJ � A C G G
rr K M C U N T C A i M A l4 T U R F C Sj
0 Q 671 5T 75 !Y
CI OF F IO�EY T� AVcL + T �A +t�ING
.
t�- F OA. CNTY C/L FEE". PAI AFL=
0 05 67 2 .7. 50 K �, M� t Y CJ C L J
;, M a 0C A I�JC = OuI�
0c5 f 3 �, 5.,a �� L
D05674
1, �9b.2c�
MIt�!�
S a ATE
T�.tASU�
U�FU�i � �•��ru�
0 L t5 0 7 5
� +
5 � G •
y '
1" A.
c� �=�ASIJI
.. 1 � t..
...
STATc C /�. F��S
,,
005E7
{:
1.2.5
i . l N
5 TA -
• =
S' A J F 1r. _ u _A ? �._.+ :' _
005677
0
1,..77• 9
MI NN
�TAT�
TR ,ASUR
C�FGS+t� -CE UTY REGi
C r5E r
��.
..,c. -..1.2
�;
�`ti MU UA_
1F = INS C O
L �.
CGn-PA3u 1CN q jiv,.�3? •��
0 �� S
i ., 7 .
/
�f 1 ?i�
, �.., E .
+�
Mtr MUTV
j TA �^�
1. E IN C0
J _ _
A! k ��r.� CONTINUA ���i _...
ANO- lCALTF INS PAYABL
_
-
Agra -LIFE I NS bE0 P AY A91".'
AN C- CE NTAL i N _wF A FL_ =__
Ar; C -CONT I Bl;Tl u NS, ItiSU
c � OE F�Si T� SCE G IS
GG5 E�
1 C MINN STATE ?K.tA..U�.
,, o _ Y T T EAS UR =R STATE C/L F E �A A� . =
005b31 �1 ,.5.� M ..TA �.
•• S S t X tiui i L S SINCE LA COUN M± E LNG
53 1J5, tit" CE
i
. .... .. .. t.V4-..... 't n a('�- �.'�a1i• Viv�+TR
eii +..i. Yi r.
� VI11�9LA
jITY CF MAPLE
CHECK
WOOL
A M C U N T
A C C 0 U N T S Q A Y A 8 L E
C L A I M A N T
OAT"' 04 -1E- 81 PAGE 4
U R P O S E
00 97 0 1
. • 79051
AMERICAN NATIONAL SANK
PAYING AGENT FEES
009702
79, 734.67
AMERICAN NATICNAL LANK
80tiLS FAYA3�
ANC -eONC INTER:'T
AND•r-AYING AG"j T FEES
0 09703
152.68
AMERICAN NATI CNAL BANK
PAYING AGENT FEES
009704
C 09705 5
1, E60. 80
2 23 .50
ARNAI.S AUTO S EA VICE
CAVID E ARNO�. C
REF. + 10AINT. VEHICLE.
1'� IFCiz Mj + C' O THi'� G
009706
_
518.25
,DAME SAH T
FE ES SERV iC;
HEATING INSPECTION
009707
0097
4601.+
87.77
30ARD OF WATER CCMM
BO ARD OF WATER CCPM
UTILITIES -�
UT1 ITIES
009709
313.21
BOARD OF WATER COMM
A/R MIS �OSTS ;LL ANr_
6.
REPAIR
CC9710
009711
30. 02
50.96
GIL eCY`R FOR""
CHARLIN QU9Li c�-ING
SUF!'LIiS, I CL
Vt H
THE CONS TFUC I CC �;�
009712
90045
C4..UT Ch + U_J0 I1vT ST PAUL
PROJECT 78-24
SU FPLI ES, ECUIPMEN T
009713
009714
2200 co
32.34
COPY CUP ICAT ING PROD
COPY a P-MEN 7
OUFLICATING COSTS
S PFLi =S EOUI PMEN' T
O 09715
182.68
COTTENS INC
SU FRLI ES, VEHICLE.
AN D- SUFOLI cS, EQUI PMENT
00971 E
E10. 00
PAS' GALEY
FEES SERVICE
PLUMING INSPECTION
OC9717
0 09 718
45.36
10 , 346.0 0
OASCO INC
Dt* LAHUNT + VO TC CC
SUFPLIES, ECUIP,MENT
FEES SERVICE
OC9719
67.50
DIAMCNL �AOIATCR REPAIR.
Annual Audit
SUPFLIES, VEHICL=
ARID -REF. + PAINT.. VEH
0 09120
6.0 0
CANIEL F FAUST
TRAVEL + TRAINING
CITY OF MAPLEk000; A C C 0 U N T S F A Y A B L E GATE 04 -16 -81 'AG: 5
C+- : K*
A M C U N T
C A i M A N T
U R P G S E
OC9737
19,3ii.00
KUNZ 01'.L CO
FUEL + OIL
0C973J
5,035.15
�A IS EANNIGAN t CI ;ESI
FEES9 SERVIC=
CC9743
2?. 1?
MACaUI,— EOUI FNEN' INC
AND -LEGA + FISCA_
Feb Services
009739
127.50
f,.AKE SAKI TATI CK
009740
4c. C 0
LAKE SANI TALI CN
T RASH REMOVAL
-- 009741
60. 3
.ESLIE FA =r�
DUPLICATING COSTS
0 S
009742
152. E0
LUGER LUMBER
MA I KTENANGE MA TER A .S -
CC9743
2?. 1?
MACaUI,— EOUI FNEN' INC
SUFPLIES, ECUAl PM Et'T
OC9744
13E.51
MANOC FHO'TO
FFES • SEkV CE
FILM PROC
GL9745 --
79932
MAFLEWOGD REV - ;7W
— - -- -- _ -.
FU9LISH1NG
009 74F,
3.32
NC I T CHE- Vk0i.. ET C C
SU PP E � � =
LI S, V_H ♦CL_
0 39'47
X53. ED
MTh C ItiS FE ION SEa VIC=
FE ES V .'.i.
G09749
23.35
MI= t� ESGTA TaRC
ELECTRICAL INSPECTION
SUPPLiES4 ECUIPMENT
00,974
30.00
�itiN STATE T�EASUt�=R
FEES, S�m C -- Wastewater
G09750
8
.57.10
MCiGOLA INC
CERTIFICATION
REF. + MAiNT.,
0 L9751
11 �. C G
MUNIC ILITE CO
O F
S PLIES, GUI PM_N .
OC9752
920.16
MVERS TIDE SUFFLY
EQUIPMENT CTHE t-%
ANC- SMAL,. TOOLS
ANC - SUPS =LIESi EOUi P ME_NT
OC9753
513.00
NATICNAL CAMERA EXCHANGE
ECUjPMENT,
GC ;�75
23.73
NATL Fiir�: PROT ASSCC
BOOKS P -' 0
S EKI L ICAO S
00;9755
1 x+18.37
CITY CF NEW c3FIGHTL,N
FE`S, SER VICE
Data Processing
;ITY OF
VA" P gEW00C
A C C 0 U
N T S P
A Y A B L E
GATE 04164 PAGE 7
CHECK*
A M C U N T
6. A i
C I
M A N T
009763
039764
9 L R F O S E
009766
30.06
CITY OF
NORTH ST
FAUN.
UTILITIES
CO
UTILITIES
� 1'
00976c
099767
E36.17
1,249.10
NG�ThEi -,N STAT ES FCi+E�
NOKTHW`STE'RN E=LL TEL
CO
CO
0 C9 757
1 , 273.65
CITY CF
NCRTH ST
F-AUL
UT ILITItS
00975f
379.71
NOnTHEi N
STATES
POSER CO
Ul ILITIES
19103958
NGKTH l%ESTERN FELL TEL
CO
TE LE FH CNE
009''2
009773
5.00
5.01
009759
1
N0� THERN
STATES
POWER CO
UTILITIES
OC9760
009761
13 .44
746. 79
Nor- .TH;4:-F.N STA I ES PowER
NC ;.T HE%N STATES PCwEr�,
CC
CO
U iLITI S
UTILITIES _
009762
4'1844 31
NOM - THERN STATES P01NER
CO
UT ILITIES
009763
039764
19192.7+
866.22
NG'-.TFEt",N STATES FC
i�0 THE�.N STATES FORE
CO
CO
UTI
UT ILITI S
009765
494.72
N0I:ThC FR N STAT S POi%ER
CO
UTILITIES
� 1'
00976c
099767
E36.17
1,249.10
NG�ThEi -,N STAT ES FCi+E�
NOKTHW`STE'RN E=LL TEL
CO
CO
T --
IT
UT I L1rS
TEL -FHCNE
009768
154.00
NGF:THhESTERN EELL TEL
Co
TELtFHCNE
009759
009770
29.85
462.13
NCnThWEST RN EELL TEL
NOrJHWEST ERN EtLL TE
CC
CO
TELEFHCNE
TELEFHCNE _.
0 09771
19103958
NGKTH l%ESTERN FELL TEL
CO
TE LE FH CNE
009''2
009773
5.00
5.01
.AVtRNP NUTEnSCh
ALFRED FELOQU Ih
TRAVEL + TRAI.NING
TRAVEL + TRAlNiNG _
039774
2 00
PETERSCN, BELL + CCNVERSE
FEES, SERVICE
PROSECUTING AT TORNEY
O C9 775
0 09 776
172..+0
41.30
F-OWEP IN 0RP0R AT E L
JOSEPH FEET TNER
SU FPL ES, E UI'MEN
CO NT FI BUTI ONS, IN SU RA NC=-__
009777
71.50
BOAC RESCUE INC
AND- TRAVEL + TRAINING
REP. + MAiNT., VEHICL S _
0 0977 F
112. E0
RUGGE C FE NTAL, RUGS
FEES, SERVICE
RUG CLEANING
ITY OF MAPL E wOCD
CHECK AM0UNT
A C C 0 U N T S F A Y A B L E
C L A I M A N T
DATE G4 -15_81 PA G^ 8
P U R P O S E
009779 1549 c + S ARTS + CRAFTS
SU FFLI ES, PROGRAM
009780
193.60
S + T %fFICE f,RODUCTS
SUPT ii ES, OfF iCE
0 09 781
20. J0
RICHARD W SCHALLER
UN IFORMS f CLOTHIN
009788
72.E0
TABULATING SERV BUREAU
FEES, SERV1C-
009782
378.93
SELECT SERVICE + SUPPLY
SUPPLIES, PPOGRAM
0
118.11
TE..E – TE RMI PALS
SUPPLT ES, EOUI PMEN T
009783
26.00.
S - ECiALTY f�ADIC SERVICE
t-P. + PAINT., RAD D
OC978.#
11 31
CH iv, I�TINE S0UTTErk
SUFI iES OURAM
979
116 . E5
TWIN CITY HA R EWARE Co
I GNS + SIGNALS
2245,ebo
CITY OF ST PAL
FrES 2 SERVICE
009792
26* 06
UN1F C*viMS UNL
ANALYSIS
OC9786
60
ST PALL DISPATCH
SUBSCRItOTIONS +MEM3EFShi
009787
200000
ST PAIL + SUEURBAN SUS
FEES, SERVICE
INC
?U % MFRCVEME NT
GALS GETAWAY
009788
72.E0
TABULATING SERV BUREAU
FEES, SERV1C-
009798
749
WEDER
DATA PROCESSING
0
118.11
TE..E – TE RMI PALS
SUPPLT ES, EOUI PMEN T
Oti9790
24.55
T'WLN CLTY FILTER SERV IN
FEES, SEPViCE
FILTERS
979
116 . E5
TWIN CITY HA R EWARE Co
I GNS + SIGNALS
AN0,w PAIN TENANCE MA TERiAL�
009792
26* 06
UN1F C*viMS UNL
UNIPO�MS + C`CTt —ING
009793
21014
VW EIMICKE ASSCC INC
SUPPLIES, OFFICE
009794
5 — G0.00
W L V SIGN + SUPaFA.Y
E.GUIFMENT, OTHER-,
0 C9795
61
WAGERS INC
SUPPLIES, OfFICE
009796
178.84
WARN.". TRUEVALUE HOWRE
SMALL TCCLS
AND– SUFPLIES, E.OUI M
ANC MAINTE M4.TE
9
47590
ELE CTFi
INC
?U % MFRCVEME NT
009798
749
WEDER
+ T ROSE TH
INC
EOUI PMENT
I
I C Y U
v e L 0 u D
A C C C L N T S Q Y A a E
C A T E: C 4 o1
G F 9
F
U
N -- --
c U9 311
53 U3
"GF UGAI
C H ZZ C K
A
M C U N 44'
C L A I I A N T
P U R
p 0
-%
2 C. J u
5 a
OG9799
R
R
133. CL
L-
WH E:EF,, HOW CC
M A I K T 1 6 : -
N A t 4 C
M A T %E A S
r
N -'
TE RI CCNWAY
- .1 3 5 U01
A Y E-7 M' T H A". A U M
W A G c-'c%
P / T
+ M
30.
C 0 9 a 0 i
164,39.56
1&7 CHECKS
e9. 3 Lj
3Ar',3AR4 LYNN L-VCM-AK
WAGES,
P/T
+ T `Yt� ~� - - °_ - - - --
G C 9 8, 2
'do
MAUR..,,-N KELLY
WAGS,
F/T
+ TL:M::e
j4
803
.0
KRIS71NE KULZ �
W A G S
T
T E-
44
5 7 5 w-
A A
i L
WA c .c
3/T
+ CM
3r, a
EvA Zl
W
r / T
+ T EMP
14
C cj E
19 04
T H T J T T Y z-
W G Sw
+ T :�'r.
0 % 9807
5
G A R T T S
E F
U
KR TSTINE J!-NSt-N
R F F
U N
r
C c.
elf.
4"A
IJ
7 vo
c f'* 0 c 0
M m
CJ LL
F
U
N -- --
c U9 311
53 U3
"GF UGAI
1E F
U
N Zj`
0 in. 00 0 A,, 1 2
0 19 5 .1
-%
2 C. J u
5 a
T C Ml A S I
MO E18 RGOT
R
R
E F
t F
U
U
N C
N 0
0 09314
N -'
TE RI CCNWAY
R
E F
U
N 3
11.4
T 07 AL
OF
164,39.56
1&7 CHECKS
CHECKS WRITT.C-N
T C 7' A" 2 7 0 v 467 903
TY OF MA'PL#'.-WOGD P A Y RO 4.1'. R FA GE I
F ` A a- p
—T" 5 T JE CH
4% r
C T 0_4
__--
C N 44 m GROSS PAY NET PAY
01252 E V A N 3 A FY n 1, 6 2 0. 4 933955
-0 1-2-5� L E W T S
0 1 2 53 FAUST
0 H A G %;- N
u 1 2 5.00
MAHOIN- Y
u 1 2 5
MAT H,-'YS
01
V " 1 G C)
VIVAN
66 0 .0 0
43 lo -5 7
DANIEL F
A PL I N-46*m
1 -9289*78
- 0
1, 011. *4
819.70
464o85
424941
M . _ 3 .. • _ 0..0
ALANA K 575.11
i-A. ol-w..E 5 A •9 0 . 22
"13
OW
s V G ;3 ril T Y
61 0 0 3 3 5.
U1262 V Iw T J'- L OR R A I K I. s 5U0.59 339.
Z' T 7
U-11 2 6 3 K i AM= s u 9
... E3 37.13
u 1 20 4
Ljn #'- 61'. U S
L.-UC
1-9.2 0 . 4 -.*- 0 0
624*87
u1
G N'-'h E E-
PHYLLI C
660*67
453s70
61260
S C H A T
J ftr-A N N c.
2 0 2
165922
s V G ;3 ril T Y
61 0 0 3 3 5.
U1262 V Iw T J'- L OR R A I K I. s 5U0.59 339.
Z' T 7
U-11 2 6 3 K i AM= s u 9
... E3 37.13
u 1 20 4
L 0 0 U I N
f
A LF R E u
J
63 4 . 6 7
7 8048
u 1 Z6 v
RIL
TERRANCi
L
140*25
131.
0 1260 -
iA N 06. L
0 �zmw'N N I S
J
I 9187o56
5 2 _
. b5
DAVIJ
L
RICHARD
61
61267
ATCHISON
J CH N
H
852000
57 8.12
01274
G1266
89.3 TYrt
0 B C R A' H
A
447911
202971
A H "A tq.!. -s
a �� T�+ J�tii r
4'+Io 844
1,9022oE7
u14 FLAUGHER J AY ME. i 586o22 379o43
L A U-S, C N
D AL
K
852o 0
34o59
L1271
C CL' L INS
KENNETH
v
1 ,
121 *76
u1272
D E'L M 0 N T
0 �zmw'N N I S
J
I 9187o56
5 2 _
. b5
01273
D RE G El- F,
RICHARD
c
I v 0 2 0 a 4 5
579000
01274
FER
RAYMOND
E
979.63
368*73
u14 FLAUGHER J AY ME. i 586o22 379o43
Y OF MAP4.LW003 FAYRO REPORT PAGE 2
l 48
C RT I F.1 CAT I CN_ REG-1 STEP% CHECK CATE 0 4al0dw
-
CHECK NA ME GROSS PAY N PAY
01276 F U L L R J AM i;.-- S 6 494,@S9 3b 5.51 -__. _
01
G R E i=
N CR M A N
i - 1 0 4 5
UL 127 8
HAGEN
THOMAS
L
1 9261.01s78
1X0$0.50
20 4954
U0 1 2 6 5
M-.Z-.HA'NvJR
852.00
Ul 79
H A W AEG
K _'V I
jl2o' 0
H N Z
P.
T� PH;:* N
676**22
526 4+ _`' 0
01281
H ER B T
M I C H A tai
J
65 4. 76
12o2
H -
AIA 1
KRAY MON I
52 8.
222 1
33 7* 87
3 5 2 . 9,4
46 8.91
351*92
U1 2 b 3
N G
R ICHAkD
"64 • 66
0
MCNULTY
JOHN
J
1X0$0.50
20 4954
U0 1 2 6 5
M-.Z-.HA'NvJR
J AM S
636.
419s32
01266
M ET T L R
D AN I EL
676**22
5 55 3 31 _ __ - - -- - - - --
01267
MC%-WSCHTEK
R IC HA
m
85
436977
_M L
KRAY MON I
63Eo44
o '4 4 *,&+8
J 1 6 9
M U a:m W
i.. ft 0-
G U-00 RG E
.10: 2 3 . 1 1
331992 _ - -- -
01290
NELSON
KAREN
A
52 3. 11
325o31
u1291
N L L S 0 oN
R OBER T
O
1 07 B* E4
66 40 63
U 1 9 2
GMAT H
JOY
t
493*33
3 3 4 .37
01293
P I E R
WILLIAM
F
1 00 1.78
=053 * 66
--
0 1 294
S . C H 'A #L. L E Rw
=Ku H A R C
w
t 4oE7
tS 5o 44
01 295
SKA' L.MAN
DONALD
w
19051*07
97908
01296
STAFNE
GREGORY
L
860s29
511*65
01297
S TI '60 L
V t7m.R N 0 114
T
63E•44
4 96
01298
STOCKTON
D AR R EL L
T
8b 0.87
5.+5o32
01299
s VE NO SEN
J OA N N E
m
586.22
3a.0 63
01300
T UC Hli6R
MICHELE
A
523*11
2429-35
546,*33
Y OF MAP t
JUJ IT A
224.52
oh,.
PAYkO
R£P0 T
f
PAGE 3
47 5.35
- - - - - -- _ - - - - - --
K GI S�� �c
C H K .ATE 0- 10-
GHLCK
NAME
86 6.25
53 3.27
GR OSS PAY
NET PAY
013G1
- W -IL -AIMS - -
UAN
J
917 "G
• i
4y 7
9.75
13Z
Z p - - -- -- --
JO�EPH
1 • 2. 00
Ebb. 19
01303
B: CK ��
R0 INAL�,
fl
911.43
214.15 -
61304
G U S i c
1 0. 0 7
u13
_ -- . _ %. _
URKF
_ _ -. -- _..
J OAV _.i____._.__
_ _8 d y . 7 8
01306
L .L ''
KBGER
w
.90 5.33
43 T .iT
u 13 C 7
_ M 0 - -- - -- -
__.._._..-
- -_
_ - -_
3 $ . 4 1
JUN
N
8 9 31
1
13 0 8 __-
'+ = L S C; _ _ ._ _ _._
_. C A.Rt _ 0 L
.._ _ _ _.. _ . 9 3 4 • E 7
U13G9
FhZ Ki FF
3� iL.
E
885078
9 7 .77
013 1 --
_ ♦v�`_
AC�L
-
�*
` 1 x+.22
-
--, .78
275
1 V N A t
-
_ ' __._.
--- - -_ -
_._ _. 17 4 3
-- -
y J E 8
• 4
01312
Vo W OK
ROBERT
E
88 9678
b 8.4 -
2
u1313
Y,;ut
--G
J AM ; S
L
d6 0S
5.
-
51 3.03
J 1314
-� �M 3 T S � _. - - - - --
- J_ M c 5
M
_ 7 8 D. E 9
5
1131
S CHART
A LFPEC
O
1 ,00 5.33
6 09006
u 131.0
- c: u-, � - - - -- -- -------- _- ._.____
4:.
L MR R Y
J
1 4 6.2 2
111999
i � 1317 -- ---
L- N = -T Y _
KJATH t :
M --
2 0
-- _.
169 . 8
01318
E LI::S
JAMES
G
875.11
48 7.5 1
01319-
_ . I- - - - -- --- -- ._
K N N z T N
G
3, 51 6. 02
_-
6 0 45
.
u 132 -
h TZ__ -- - -_ -_
mAi
A
A.9
4
31 699 9
L1321
F LC K
D£ NNIS
L
875.11
47 7.86
uiscc w �L; W c KTH
JUJ IT A
224.52
175.99 _
0 132 3 W lpL LIA MS CN _
#R03 *T F
770922
47 5.35
01324 G L; 5 S LEK
WALTER m
86 6.25
53 3.27
uisc.7 LL JAMES T - 764.44 497.68
Y 40F MAP,...t__wOGl:D
PAYkC6L
It,
REPOU
P A G 4
25 0.40
X16.89
292e89
135
750925
22 5.48
k.O 16.RT Fl. CAT I GN
-GIST-R
R t
CHECK CATt' 04m10 w61
r.
763e20
763.20
CHECK
NAM%z
GUSINLA
MELVIN
GROSS PAY
NET PAY
653926
U_ 1347
u1348
H lifti L E Y
JCHNSON
ROLAN5
GARY
3
p
7 6 3 0
54o00
U1326
WYMAN
~ JAMS
MARK
651911
448*30
01327
BRE-HEIM
ROG E__ R
w
332980
242*50
415*80
U1328
CASS
WILLIAM
C
1 1314*17
642*08_
7 0" 3. 0
481o70
L
01329
F R E B Iii K G
RONALD
61330
H Em L ftE Y
R ON A L
0 76304
431*70
01331
HOCHBIN
JOSEPH
H
332980
267#27
K AN
M IC H At" L
334o71
k
76 3. c 0
01332
01333
K LA US NG
H N R' Y
F
to 4
4=+ 7. 3 8
01334
-M EY ER
G fEWR A L 0
w
788o0 8
394913
0 1335
FR;TTNLR
0.") PH
1 9292*83
823o93
01336
R i N
Ow ARU
A
763o20
431
01337
T EV L-I N J R
HARPY
7b 3. *0
53 5.20
Lil 336
L GC%o tl E
G "'L BE
i L R T
5b 4*
373*2*
013 3,-j
A U m
PAJLINE
m
1 17 7.2 1
649*67
01340
6 R E N N R
L O."Lr S
J
58 b.22
196o24
j1341
01342
0:13 43
K IRU MM L
OD_ GA Z
WARD
3 AR BAR A
R 03 E. R T
IR OY
A
G
25 0.40
X16.89
292e89
135
750925
22 5.48
u13-+4
01347
B U N " K E
GLRMA,&N
M Y L E S
DAVID
r.
763e20
763.20
403e46
478*76
01346
GUSINLA
MELVIN
I v 2 3, 7 * 8 4
653926
U_ 1347
u1348
H lifti L E Y
JCHNSON
ROLAN5
GARY
3
p
7 6 3 0
54o00
48 9* 34
54.00
01349
MARUSKA
MARK
A
70 0.80
453926
0 13 5 0
SANTA
REED
L
7b7. 0
415*80
'Y OF MNPi. E WOuD P AY RCS.;. R' EE PO T PA GEm 5
C PTIF� Rw . S _ Cr�c ca TE_ o�+- i_D. -81 -
J
C HE CK NAM= GR GSS PAY N CET PAY
01351 SCHMIDT JOHN' 25.00 22.83
'135 BKUN:: L L. t3M� 3AIR A J 26 5.44 199.21
61353 GR;.W JANET M 547.11 359973
u1354 HO�SNL' LL JUDITH A 28 -4.00 210925
0 13 55
S T ER
C HRIST I
A
57,
39
0 13 50"'
CHic6 CK
JUDY
M
616.00
231938
01357
EKSTR% NU
THOMAS
G
70 u. 4 4
432.51 _~
61370
J CHt4SI; N
R AN0 AL L
L
700.
455.67
J1359
MISK LL
NANCY
J
221.20
166.10
__..
61360
OLSON
G�*JFFREY
W
1,195.11
663962
01361
_ UST+�Gy
MARJORI'.
J.
1 E7
627995 _
'1362
W:.NGcR
03 FcT
.1
711.11
x461.52
_ u1 ;3b3
E OSON
DAVID
0
80 6976
50 4.2
u 1 3b&+
GAUS
STEVEN
A
4 00. G0
344991
01305
KREY
GERALD
E
676.80
419.19
U13b6 ivNDE C A 810.01 535.U2
` u13b 7
_NUT C. ')
LAV =RN
S
1 ,27 7.35
541.73
01.368
0
GER
C
777.10
44 19 11
^
_01369
MACJ01.
JOHN
c
865.27
542.69
i� 137 u"
MJ � U
OEN IS
14
83 E. 48
510. 57
CHECK
RESISTER TGTALc
91,463.82
48
--01371
aran o
u o p
o~
01372
Bartholomew
Richard
J.
78e 73
78* 73
01251
Lewis
vivan
R.
660.00
437957
CHECK
REGISTER TOTALS
9 2, 3 0 8.61
48-2909997
e- 3
T0:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCAT -IDN:
APPLICANT /OWNER:
PROJECT:
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
City Manager _
Director of Community Development
Time-Extension for Preliminary Plat
Linwood_ _Avenue__
Castle Design and Development Company
Linwood Heights
April 2, 1981
Reque
A 90 day time extension for the preliminary plat.
Proposed Land Use
A quad development of 44 dwelling units (eleven structures) .
12- 20 -70: Council approved the preliminary plat, planned unit development, and
lot split. Approval of the plat is subject to the following conditions:
1. The final plat shall not be approved, unless:
a. Council orders H i l l wood Drive from the east side of the Crestwood K n o l l s
Plat to McKnight Road, including sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, and
storm water retention ponds,
b. Council orders Dorl and Road from proposed Hi 1 lwood Drive to Linwood Avenue
including sanitary sewer, water,, storm sewer and storm water re -tenti on
pond.
c. The lot split is approved by Council and the property for Dorl and Road
is deeded to the City.
d. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved by-laws and rules of the
proposed homeowners' association to assure all common areas are
maintained.
2. Redesignate the common areas as outl ots .
3. Approval of the final grading and drainage plan by the City Engineer.
4. Approval of a planned unit development.
3- 20 -80: Council approved a time extension for the applicant's preliminary
plat.
4- 17 -80: Council ordered the Hi l 1 wood Drive -Do rl and Road Improvement project,
6 -5 -80: Council approved a 90 day time extension for Linwood Hei-ghts preliminary
plat and also passed a resolution directing the City Engineer to prepare final
plans and specifications for the Hi 1 lwood Drive -Dorf and Road improvement project.
The developers must, however, pay all costs for the preparation of these plans and
specifications.
The work on the plans and specifications for the Hill wood Drive -Dort and Road
improvement project has been halted by the developer unti 1 , chars 9 es could be
made to the development plan. State Statutes require a public improvement to
be under construction within one year of the City Council ordering the project,
9 P J
therefore, plans and specifications must be completed, right -of -way must be
acquired, and a construction contract must be let by April 17, 1981. It is clear
at this point, that Council will have to reorder this project before it could
proceed.
10 -2 -80 and 1- 22 -81: Council approved a 90 "day time extension for the a p p l i c a n t ' s
preliminary plat.
3- 27 -81: The consulting engineers for the applicant met with Staff and discussed
proposed revisions to the preliminary plat. The applicant w i l l be submitting a
revised site layout in the near future.
DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS
Planning s
1. Land Use Plan Designation: RLE, Low Density Residential Extended
2. Zoni ng: F, Farm Residential
3. Section 1004.080 (b) of the City Code states that, "Within ninety (90) days
y
of the approval of a preliminary plan by the Village Council, there shall be
submitted to the Council an original and three (3) copies of a final plat,
which may embrace all or part of the area shown on the preliminary plan".
CONCLUSION
Analysi s
It is impossible that construction on the Hill wood Drive -Dorf and Road improvement
project will begin by April 17, 1981. Council, therefore, would have to approve M
the project again through a public hearing if the project is to commence.
At this point, Staff does not see any reason to recommend denial of the time
extension. The applicant is still interested in completing the roject, despite
P
delays, as is evident because of his plans to revise the rel i mi nar plat.
P y
2
Recom.mendat.ion
Approval of a 90 day time extension for the Linwood Heights preliminary m'
9 p l � nary plat
on the basis that:
l . Additional time is needed for the developer's consulting engineers
the revised plans,
9 _ rs to complete
p s.
2.
Council has approved s i m i l a r
time extensions in the as
p t
for other
plats.
3.
There has been no changes in
the area that would require re
9
a change
nge
'
� n the plat.
Enclosed:
I. Location Map
2. Site Plan.
3
Q Z Q
35
uPPEA ♦ «oH RV W a a
72aNR2- 2
Z 1 1
4
• LOWER AF-1OW RD.
_ Q
- LOND L A_
Ln
68
MA 11 LND RD_
CL cr) L AK1` wocb ORIvE -
• « i
A6 P OD DRIVE _
[REST JEW DRjvE zz - '
0
V
(2%
LiNWOOD AVE._
Xy, D j • - AVE
�uvfl N% %
C IL
}-
~ - T 2 8 N L.tl
z _ t2 T
R22W R21% z
T [ • �� •� s T [fl
/ T Ae • �.
12
_ t
HiG HWODD A 7 4
25
_N
M •q�,1! AVE,
E mrTZ ST
CASTLE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
PETITIONER
PRELIMINARY PLAT TIME EXTENSIO
REQUEST,
1 . LOCATION MAP
4
a
A17
77 0 ,1
lb
lk
lb
4p
.: •/ '� ► _ • • . •� � �''r y am . Q ��
dr
r— Sr •
w .0 77
Y — f-ay -Ok
4 F .4L i.7
IT
.1 V.,
t� ' 7-
V.— f
10, .
ib
ir
tiv a
de -6
jp =a
ASTLE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
TlTIONER
QUEST
dM
t
l • I � r !�,� � � `J� yr
Ann
e.
A.
rt�
4
N
. ........
I rr ' q
[4
% %4L
de -6
jp =a
ASTLE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
TlTIONER
QUEST
dM
t
l • I � r !�,� � � `J� yr
Ann
e.
A.
rt�
4
N
. ........
I rr ' q
[4
21
M E M O R A N D U M
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT /OWNER:
PROJECT:
DATE:
T
City Manager
Director of Community Development
Time Extension for Preliminary Plat
Lakewood Drive, Maryland Avenue, and Sterl`i ng Street
Arlington Properties _
Beaver Lake Hills
April 2, 1981
f
SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL
Request
C . C
Extension of the preliminary plat for an additional 90 days, and also, that Council
order the construction of the 12 acre -foot holding pond (see enclosed letter).
Propose Land Use
A quad development comprised of 46 buildings (184 two - bedroom units).
Past Actions
3- 20 -80: Council approved the preliminary plat, street vacation, and a planned
unit development for Beaver Lake Hills, subject to conditions. One of the conditions
was that Council order the construction of a 12 acre -foot holding pond on the property
to the southwest, as shown on the "Maplewood Drainage Plan".
6-5-80: Council approved a 90 -day time extension for the Beaver Lake Hills preliminary
plat, subject to the original conditions. Council also passed a resolution ordering
a feasibility study for the Beaver Lake Hills holding pond and drainage system.
The f e a s i b i l i t y study is in the process of being completed by the City's Engineering
staff.
10 -16 -80 and 1-22-81: Council approved 90 -day time extensions, subject to the original
conditions of the preliminary plat.
DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS
Planninn
1. Land Use Plan Designation: Rm, Medium Density Residential
2. Zoni ng: F, Farm Residential
3. Section 1004.030 of the City Code states that: "Approval of a preliminary plan
shall be null and void unless within- ninety (90) days after receiving the last
required approval of the preliminary plat, there shall be submitted to the Clerk
of the Village a final plat or plans in accordance with the conditions upon which
such approval was granted by the Council."
CONCLUSION
Analys i s
Staff sees no reason to deny the applicant's request for another 90 -day time extension.
The City's Engineering Department is presently completing work on the feasibility
study for the holding pond, so the project is moving ahead,
Recommendation
Approval of a 90-day time extension for the Beaver Lake Hills preliminary plat, based
on the findings that:
1. T4e City Engineering staff is still preparing a feasibility study for a holding
pond.
2. Counci 1 has approved time extensions in the past for other plats.
3. There are no changed conditions that would justify denial of the time extension.
Enclosed:
1. Location map
2. Preliminary plat
3. Applicant's letter dated 3-20-81
- 2 -
tt ��• i
�
F-
S
Y
1�
G�
-r-- -J . E. M .,;,'Y L A N O
` 31
-= - �Kc e
- -= !o =
�w Q
• I -.: � �
AVE.
-�
L� AV F
BuSH
v
2 a ' AVE, c
Q
.: jr
M ARfLA KE R0. `
LIJ
t�
• �-;►
Q
I xv [)
Fl i � Q
o
, oiler Court
(P ' 2, 2
Av
+ , i tLV
i:r• f - ---� .. :��', ST
.......
r• - - 10
I p T r p�
0
w WL
{� a F
1 �2
` S T.
�
7TH z
E. 7 TN
a'.
L
T 2 9 N
2 5130 I
R 22W 3��3{ ?WZl i _
; 70>
ILI
W J '
of J W
• ~ + < FREMO N7 AVE
•
3M v zli
cq
ARLINGTON PROPERTIES
PETITIONER
TIME EXTENSION
[ REQU EST
I. LOCATION MAP
a
. - ..•.•..•.rte «..••..n...��.^_ ._ .. _� ._.. ..
Z MJ d L PAi4K I
U7 t
«` .�... ~ • :•d ± J _ • . •...�.�;�� - . t ► - � -- a �- '- � • �T• - 1- ......." : - � - -. •_• - w - .-+fr t� . J y Jll...�,` jA � +~! +•�- • � _ ._- }- -- �z • • mm& a � •
• . • l/! .r��i 11 � A Y, T, 1 .. r� w ! . • ..�� / ♦ / 1 V T .." T •"�"° + -. +hri .r +►.— . b O
ZZA t T
tt- r -. ►. i t t- �.
~` 1 T
•
•
is.
1
40
2
I C F
_ _
t .■ .!'sQ_ v.11t1m r • it�L + [ � VA[ ?� � -!•sC- x!"10 • >t:t �•1, r / r � 1
RE HILLS
f �, Lt; .3t_� H � 11 � O tt- � tL' � M � � • : 1/ • � ti ,� .n��11 - E_ ►�- •: •-' -`.�� � ,
x`11 /1 ,. —K --11 . �1 • r �•; f1— -_ " o ��•� / ! 1111PU11000. MAXIMA 05'I I I w "a •e, a"W
• I ' p t f 1 _ 11D t . _ - -� — - --� . ' •' , "soma • ve" Tyra r�M/• M s..
1 . A
• , �► ' I i r rk; i - '�•`_ + r' }�.- _ .�; E S I lost wn,. • .a "m .r....
,
t 1 i N , ' • - --" +� ���lr `� '.� ! AVENUE
LEGAL WESCRIPTION
1 , \ o04 M S. w.ns r. "W r• mops Tar ate. w 6A 1
D 11 1 � •... r • 1. / ' 1 - • - X . s i " � t sA 1. W �M • r S. M.r• .Y to 014 MW "M 4400900
,•�� ! '' 1 `, �!}..�+,�,,,, !! T •��•Q f ,.~ • , /, �• , ' ' 1-- - f. '� .If �1I• r / '•l r90•f117 • I W" sew M.
7 4F 4=
..� 11 , / "^^. 4jKi --• --- \ I . I. '•.arl/f. )s. .wta /s. .Mw Ow»A. rwwraaf. ..�
li , r ,.,.,...,.. _.._._.,. ► , SITE DATA
r / '� r 1 f 1 -' '� ra —/ • , ` ' 1^ 1 ` �I�n sllta 41 11111 s1M!• o - ` 460 41111110 f
,� , . 1 � �- t • M � it4ltiL.1. ,.. Ito
f • 1/ �l 11 - t
29 •... ...... •rw lost T� •.
1 •t R / ...w •.� taw t M
• r I i , A 1 � �i 1 1 ( W t ,. t wan r..a a•s � • • San '� L JN
3 I M—•-t 1 \, 1 t 1 1 1, I t w Low wo w •t
4 ; � _ t 1 � Z� t � i • � � ) � � - .� w • ati• •sra r"11111 • t asnu
�.r '.. "� „ r ' r � 11 st.wr , A � t• ft"
taus
i T a' No 1>� r IMAM ww. • sly • •
\ >t 1 ► r • 1�' i1 11 .-... Aram . . •ti""�O+a, / •s 0- J1 r«
+ , i / " �_ t t Q E I A N t U M • OW%M 1�.. . ► aw,.. r tttr.:- .. -nu 1110A nr
1 11 — -1} -- 1 yt ?
_-� 1 - -_ A r E N Y Er urrr . A••R. •L •1 $
t '• /,•/ - .».w .tin sY. 11 s �� at:��u► .
1 ♦ / �. I i , - - sc . • - - t; r -}� , �• .•�... a! rrwt :MIt lam. 1, 1 1 !/ f .11tIpIM
t r ---�----•-
tf�-- C.. /� 1 : , 1� �-• - � -- •• �rw r.w..M . ru. s.ti,s � o,s •w,T, w.l.w�a ,
t .,� � E '• 0 .
M IA.
:I . 1 1 • , / �` i � 1 . -_..._ ` ,,' ! L % // / � 1 I , � '. 1 , � r . J� _ _..__ _ i � 1 � .1__ _ ` � �' � � , �� (sAS� w►III� r. n. �1 71�P try • 11�s � ti
ML
0000 cn o
AIR
1 2'x,
14 v
r I
• � ' � _ --� iacATloN
AK
• ' • , ,111 M � � 1 . ► / � � � .-'. -'�_�' .. �.- -�" �'-" �
�
• j 1
noun T
MAGMA
r
r
UMP
wilmorm V1101110 MONO
prrllr halls wos �,.., .• ��,.,' •
M wltss .•..l.. �w••••���
• 1 Iwo 11•0,
40r
y
properties
?; }
W 44 WEST ARLINGTON ST. PAUL, - MINNESOTA 55117
TEL. 488-)03M 0526
R. E. SA G STE T T ER
General Manager
I'larch 20, 1981
To the Mlayor and City Council
City of 1 �a pl ewoo d
1380 Frost. Avenue
Maplewood, Minn 4p 55109
Re: Beaver Lake Hills
Genelemen:
On nay 9, 1980, we wrote you as fol 1 ok „ ,s :
"Kindly proceed with the orderi na of construction of the
12 acre -foot holding pond as required by the City Counci on
t1arch 20, 1980, as a condition for the final plat of Beaver
Lake Hills.”
We
request again the construction of this holding pond.
q
Arlington Properties also hereby reques a time extension
of an additional 90 days for final platting.
Sincerely,
ARLINGTON PROPERTIES;
By,�.,., �_ 1
R. E. Sagstetter, partner
��
t
e . s
M E M O R A N D U M
T0:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
OWNER /APPLICANT:
PROJECT:
DATE:
City Manager
Director of Community Development
Preliminary Plat Time Extension
South of Londi n Lane
Mary Anderson Construction Company
Crestview Third Addition
April 1, 1981
-4.
SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL
Re ue
Approval of a 90 -day time extension for the Crestview Third Addition preliminary plat .
Proposed Land Use
A planned unit development to construct 86 single dwelling homes and 10 double
dwellings (20 units).
BACKGROUND
Site Descri ti on
Existing Land Use: Undeveloped
Surrounding Land Uses
Northerly: Londin Lane and the Connemara Condominiums
Southerly: Mailand Road and single dwelling homes
Easterly: Single dwelling . homes being constructed in the Crestview l st Addition plat
Westerly: Hi ghvi ew Towmhouses
1. 11 -1 -79: Council approved a preliminary plat and planned unit development permit
for the project, with the condition that the first building permit must be issued
within one year of the PUD shall terminate, unless renewed by the City Council.
2. 6 -5 -80: Council approved a 90 -day time extension for the Crestview Third Addition
preliminary plat, subject to the original conditions.
3 . 1 Q- 16 -80: Council approved. another 90 -day time extension, s ub j Kct to the o r i g i n a l
conditions, and also renewed the PUD.
4. 1- 22 -81: Counci 1 approved another 90 -day time extension for the preliminary i mi nary 1 at
p p
subject to the original conditions.
DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS
Planning
1. Land Use Plan Designation: RL , Low Density Residential and Rm, -�Medi um Density
Residential .
2. Zoning: F, Farm Residential
3. Section 1004.030 of the City Cade states that: "Approval of a preliminary
plan shall be null and void unless within ninety (90) days after receiving the last
required approval of the preliminary plan, there shall be submitted to the Clerk
of the Village a final plat or plats in accordance with the conditions upon which
such approval was granted by the Council."
Recommendation
Approval of a 90 -day time extension for the Crestview Third Addition preliminary plat,.
based on the findings that:
1. Council has approved s i m i l a r time extensions in the past for other plats.
2. There have been no changes in the area that woul justify denial of a time extension.
r --- 11 - - --I-
1. Location Map
2. Preliminary Plat
0
-7 ON 0.
Lj P P E P AF
A L�j' L-AL J L
• . ........
r 'T
RU)
L C
o e
t 0 N D! N
L E
1 / / j /; � ,
Y HE
1 31 P C---C v E
C ) CAY CIRCLE
e- All
(3)
LAK WOCr�
Z K 0 C C— P I E
t.
L
(3) L v I p I
�. ! .� 25
t- D AVE
( oj
41G�,,lc't .)D AVE
Jc
74
®
U i7 f
T
6 �
o �.\ 1 � b3 � t2 r f 4• _ �
o .,
0. L. A !4 go
t .., `.- ti �7 c 1 C) tic I V, v -
`o �c t , •'' � Z
.3 4 5 `
lo
i 6
9 5 E_ Q -1 I 9s 83 7
--------
PRES COTT 0 RD: + ------------ 1
� 85 85 8� Ipj� - •
�3Q
70 7-1
56
16 s 1 It-4
to9 �
.t �o 1tt 141 +3�• t er �° }O
co
1f
s' �7 6 7 6 13 c r
i� c 7 t t
130
i s i^ 5 1 ae
cr
cc 4 CO
C R T ID
0 1 _
1 4 Z z /. � 1 c
i 1
9 co
7 b s s 3 f 3c
rl ii
r 1 �� 14 t3s t 13 ZI
t c -� c r i
.. SI � e � �
13 2 Z 3 i „c ^► f 3^
tto 43 30 1F3
;LU � bo t3o 103
m o �
ce
'` V jr „ o 30
Z o o
'9Z
E Z
• 4 f35
V G
9 17 .... ...... AV Ef '00
3
.�.
r g to 9 4
3 $ cc —t j` 7s ho 8° at is t' '
13 14
x m fill, �C
13D 40
87 113 8 p 80 L f
9c -.
-- -- to 9n � it s
ID
0 46
r3�
STC� • � d
. er+
6 3 41 3 2 9 r 0.L. B
4 O
tzo t a 90 qo 0
90 10 qo 85 'ti
!SS
2
4 = i
y
020 t
t •'i ! + SD 0 30
` L • r ` • •• • t+• T -•
SO '
4• -,-
a�
ME
TO: City Manager
r
FROM: Director of Public Works
DATE April 9, 1981
SUBJEC "OPTICOM" AT MINNEHAHA AND CENTURY
Attached is an agreement with the Minnesota Department of
Transportation to install an emergency vehicle pre-emption
system at the intersection of Minnehaha Avenue on Century
Avenue. The state will compl the work with Maplewood
paying approximately $5,300 of the cost.
It is recommended that the City Council approve',the
agreement-by adopting the attached resolution.
KGH /mn
'
Minnesota
Q
Department of Transportation
District 9
34.8 Hadley Avenue Forth, Box 20 0
forth St. Paul, Mi nnesota 109
(612) 7 7 0- 2311 ,
March 31, 1981
Mr. William Bittner
Director of Public Works
City of Maplewood
1902 E. County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
In reply please refer to: 319
Traffic Signal
Agreement No. 60364
S.P. 6227 - 36
Emergency Vehicle Pre - emption System
T.H. 120 at CSAH 34(Minnehaha Ave.)-
Co. Rd . 70 (10th St. No.) in Maplewood,
Ramsey County and Oakdale, Washington County
Dear Mr. Bittner:
Attached are three copies of an agreement between the State of Minnesota,
Department of Transportation, and the City of Maplewood covering the
cost , maintenance and operation of a emergency vehicle pre - emption system
on Trunk t.ighway 120 at C . S . A. H . 34 (Minnehaha Ave.)-County Road 70 (10th
St. No.).
If this agreement meets with your approval, kindly . present it to the
City Council for their approval and execution. The Corporate Seal should
be affixed to all copies of the agreement and all copies of the resolution.
When the agreement has been executed by the City Council,, all three copies
are to be returned to this office, together with three certified copies of
a resolution authorizing its officers to sign it on its behalf.
After the agreement has been executed by the proper State Officials, a
certified copy will be returned to you for your files.
Sincerely,
�fDouglas H. Differt, P .E. z
r
District Engineer
Attachments:
An Equal Op portunity Employer
MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL
AGREEMENT NO. 60364
BETWEEN
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AND
THE CITY OF MAPLE 00D, MINNESOTA
FOR
Construction, revision, maintenance, operation and removal of
Emergency Vehicle Traffic Control Signal Pre-emption S �st
P Sly stem- on
Trunk Highway No. 120 ( Century Avenue) at Mi.nnehaha Avenue
(County State Aid Highway No. 34) - 10th Street North C
( oun ty
Road No, 70) in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota,
S.P. 6227 -36
4
Prepared by Traffic Engineering
ESTIMATED AMOUNT RECEIVABLE AMOUNT ENCUMBERED
Cit of Maplewood $5 , 300
None
3
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the
State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter
referred to as the "State", and the City of Maplewood,;-
. i
Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City", 'ZTNESSETH
Y . .
r
WHEREAS, the city desires to provide an Emergency
Vehicle Traffic Control Signal Pre- emption System, hereinafter
referred to as the "System", for the traffic control signal on
Trunk Highway No. 120 ( Century Avenue) at Minnehaha Avenue
( County State Aid Highway No. 34) - 10th Street North (County .
Road No. 70) in the City as hereinafter set forth; and
lAvHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 161.39,
the Comini.ssioner of Transportation may upon request provide
technical and engineering advice, assistance and supervision to
any county or rnunici pal ity; and '
WHEREAS, the materials,' equipment, labor and miscel-
laneous items necessary to construct, operate, maintain, revise
and remove said Systems shall be at the sole cost and expense
of the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. The State shall prepare the necessary plan, spe-
cifications, and proposal and shall perform the engineerin g and
inspection required to complete the items of work hereinafter
set forth. Such work as described immediately above shall con-
stitute "Engineering and Inspection" and shall be so refer red
to hereinafter.
60364
1
,MV
29 The contract cost of the work or, if the work is not
contracted, the cost of all labor, materials,
and equipment
rental required to complete the work shall constitute !the -
a c
tual "Construction Cost" and shall be so referred to herein
of
t e.r .
3. The State shall install or cause the
of
a System for the traffic control signal on Trunk Hig g y No.
120 (Century Avenue) at'Minnehaha Avenue - 10th Street � -
Ivor th in
accordance with the plan and specifications for State Project
sect
No. 6227 -36, Estimated Construction Cost is $5,000 which
includes $2, 500 for S Late force account work. City's y s share is
100 %0
4. Upon execution of this agreement and a request in
writing by the State, the City shall advance to the State an
amount equal to the City's share of the cost based on the a'-
c
tual bid price and the estimated cost for work b State
y forces
plus 6 percent of such amount for the City's share e of the cost
. for Engineering and Inspection,
5. Upon final payment to the contractor and computation
of the City's share for the work rovid
p ed for herein, that
amount of the funds advanced b the City in
Y y excess of the
City's share will be returned to the •
City without Interest and
the City agrees to pay to the State that amount t of the City s
share which is in excess of the amount of the funds advanced by
the City.
60364
-2-
6. Emitter units and the System provided for in
paragraph 3 hereof which is added to a traffic control signal
on a State ,Trunk Highway or to a traffic control sign9
maintained by the State shall be in accordance
ce with the
following conditions and requirements.
a. All modifications, revisions and maintenance of
the System considered necessary or desirable, for
any reason, shall be done by State forces or,
upon concurrence in writing by the State's
Director - Office of Traffic Engineering, may be
done by others.
b. Emitter units may be installed on a fire station
which is immediately adjacent to a signalized in
.tersection and may be installed and used only on
vehicles responding to an emergency as defined in
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 169.01, Subdivision 5
and 169.03. Vehicle emitter units may be
installed only on City owned fire, police and
rescue squad vehicles without approval in writing
by the Commissioner of Transportation.
c. In the event said System or components are, in
the opinion of the State, being misused or the
conditions set forth in paragraph b above are
violated, the State shall remove the
Sys -t em .
Upon removal of the System for any reason, the
60364
_3_
I
field wiring, cabinet wiring and other components
shall become the property of the State. All inf-
rared detector heads and indicator lamps mounted
external to the traffic control signal cabinet
will be returned to the City. The detector
receiver and any other assembly located in the
traffic control signal cabinet, which if removed
will not af fect the traffic control signal opera-
tion, will be returned to the City.
d. All timing of said System shall be determined by
the State through its Commissioner of
Transportation.
7. Any and all persons engaged in the aforesaid con
struction. work to be performed by the State shall not be con-
sidered employees of _the City and any and all claims that may
or right arise under the Worker's Compensation Act of this
State on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and
all claims made by any third party as a consequence of an act
q Y
or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged a ed on
said work shall not be the obligation and responsibility i t of the
P �
City.
8. Upon being ' placed in operation, the System provided
for hereby, shall become a Fart of Traffic Control Signal
Maintenance Agreement No. 1629 -R between the arties_ dated
P _
April 27, 1978.
60364
-4-
CIT OF MAPLEWOOD
APPROVED AS TO FORt4:
City.Attorney
By
M1ayor -- -- _
(City Seal)
By
City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
� Engineer
Operations Division
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
By
Assistant Co:nmi ss Toner
Dated
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION:
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
_ -- B y _ _- ----_
Special Ass i s t-ant Attorney
-
General - State of Minnesota
Dated
60364
-5-
RESOLUTIO
BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood enTer into
an= agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department cif.
Transportation for the following purposes, to -wit:
For the construction, revision, maintenance,
operation and removal of a Emergency Vehicle
Traffic Control Signal s Pre-emption stem on
F �
Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue) at
Minnehaha Avenue - 10th Street North in the
City in accordance with Agreement No. 60364
a copy of which was before the Council.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers
be and are hereby authorized to execute such agreement, and
thereby assume for and on behalf of the City all of the con-
tractual obligations contained therein.
CERTIFICATION
State of Minnesota
County of Ramsey
City of Maplewood
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a
true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted
by the Council. 'of the City of Maplewood at a duly authorized
meeting thereof held on the day of
1981, as shown by the -minutes of said meeting in my possession,
i
City clerk
(City Seal}
MEMORANDUM
A7
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Public Works
DATE: April 9, 1981
SUBJECT: VAN DYKE STREET WATERMAIN AGREEMENT
The following agreement addresses an existing watermain
in Van Dyke Street north of Ripley Avenue, The County
installed the pipe 2 years ago as a private system in
compliance with Maplewood standards. The pipe is, however,
in public right -of -way and as such should be under Maplewood
j uri sdiction .
The agreement would transfer ownership of the watermain to
the City of Maplewood and make St. Paul responsible for
maintenance. This, of course, only applies to that portion
of the system located in the public right-of-way.
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached
agreement between the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County and
the St. Paul Water Utility.
KGH /mn
r
0 7
1
}
MEMORANDUM
A7
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Public Works
DATE: April 9, 1981
SUBJECT: VAN DYKE STREET WATERMAIN AGREEMENT
The following agreement addresses an existing watermain
in Van Dyke Street north of Ripley Avenue, The County
installed the pipe 2 years ago as a private system in
compliance with Maplewood standards. The pipe is, however,
in public right -of -way and as such should be under Maplewood
j uri sdiction .
The agreement would transfer ownership of the watermain to
the City of Maplewood and make St. Paul responsible for
maintenance. This, of course, only applies to that portion
of the system located in the public right-of-way.
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached
agreement between the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County and
the St. Paul Water Utility.
KGH /mn
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
THIS INDENTURE, made this day of , 981, by and between
....THE $0ARD OF RAMSEY COUNTY . COMMISSIONERS, a Minnesota Political Subdivision, herein-
_
fter designated as "County ", the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, a Minnesota Political Sub-
division, hereinafter designated as "Maplewood ", and the BOARD OF WATER COh�ISSIONERS
OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, hereinafter designated
as "Board ";
WHEREAS, An agreement by and between the County, Maplewood and the Board
dated May 30, 1979 provides for the installation of a private water main in County
owned property, said document being on record with the Ramsey County Recorder as
Abstract Document 2057636 and Torrens Document 682337; and
WHEREAS, the County owns the following described land situated within the
corporate limits of the City of Maplewood in the County of Ramsey and State of
Minnesota:
The East 190 feet of the West 810 feet of the South 235.80 feet of the
Northwest 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29 North, Range 22 West; also,
The West 810 feet of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 14,
Township 29 North, Range 22 West, except the West 620 feet of the North
438 feet thereof. Subject to the rights of the public in White Bear
Avenue and North St. Paul Road Connection, (also known as Ripley Street.)
Subject to sewer easements of record.
All that part of Section 14, Township 29 North, Range 22 West described as
follows: The West 620 feet of the North 438 feet of the Southwest 1/4
3
of said section .together with the West 620 feet of the S=th 235.8 feet
and the North 52 feet of the South 287.8 feet of the West 160.05 feet of
the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 14. Subject to the rights of the public
in White Bear Avenue.
l
Subject to streets and avenues and easements and rights -of -way, and
ly
I ;{
except part of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 Southeasterly of North
Saint Paul Road and Southwesterly of Hazel Street and except the West
j
810 feet of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 and exceptt the West 810
feet of the South 235.8 feet of the South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 and
r
i
except the West 870 feet of the South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 lying
North of said South 235.8 feet, the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 and
the South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4, all in Section 14, Township 29 North,
Range 22 West; and
WHEREAS, The County has conveyed and granted to Maplewood and to the Board
r
t$
a perpetual utility easement in, under, through, over and across the following
�a
described land: j
' fT
A water main easement over the South 30 feet of the North 160 feet of the
East 190 feet of the West 810 feet of the Southwest 1/4 and over the East
30 feet of the ' West 650 feet of the North 130 feet of the Southwest 1/4 and 1 `
over the East 3.0 feet of the West 650 feet of the South 97 feet of the
i
Northwest 1/4; all in Section 14, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, Ramsey
County, Minnesota.
J
Together with a 30 foot wide water main easement the centerline of which
is described as follows:
q
Beginning at a point 82 feet North of the South line of the Northwest 1 T4 and
620 feet East of the West line of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 14 Township �-
29 North, Range 22 West; thence West parallel to the South line of said r?
�r
Northwest 1/4 for 284 feet; thence deflecting 90 left for a distance of E
�
90 feet; thence deflecting 45 left for a distance of 60 if eet and there termina-
ting. •
Together with a 30 foot wide easement, the centerline of which is descirbed
as follows:
_2_
The East 30 feet of the West 840 feet lying South of the North 130 feet all
in the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29 North
Range 22 West, Ramsey County, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, The County has requested conversion of that portion of water main
within the VanDyke Street right -of -way to the status of public water main, said
portion of the VanDyke Street right -of -way being more specifically described as:
The East 30 feet of the West 840 feet lying South of the North 130 feet, all
in the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29 North,
Range 22 West, Ramsey County, Minnesota,
said parcel hereinafter designated as "VanDyke Easement ".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That
1. Maplewood hereby accepts the water main and appurtenances situated within
the VanDyke Easement as a part of the Maplewood water distribution system.
2. The Board agrees to the conversion of the private water main in the VanDyke
Easement from a private to a public water main. The Board also agrees to
maintain the water main and appurtenances in the VanDyke Easement in accor-
dance with subsisting agreements now in force by and between Maplewood and
the Board and such agreements as hereinafter entered into by Maplewood and
the Board.
3. Maplewood and the Board do hereby release and discharge any right or
interest they possessed in the private water main easement heretofore
conveyed and recorded in Ramsey County Recorder's Document 2057636 and
Torrens Document 682337, and described as follows:
The East 30 feet of the West 840 feet lying South of the North 130
feet, all in the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest_1 /4 of Section 14,
Township 29 North, Range 22 West, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
4. Maplewood and the Board do, hereby recognize VanDyke Street as a publicly
dedicated right -of -way in which Maplewood and the Board have specific'
-3-
r
rights and responsibilities pertaining to the installation and maintenance
of public water facilities.
7
5.- Any Northerly extension of the existing water main in= the VanDyke Street
right -of -way shall be a public water main and part of the Maplewood water
1.
distribution system.
6. The remainder of the private water main lying Westerly of the VanDyke
Street right -of -way shall continue to be subject to terms and conditions
of the aforementioned private water main agreement dated May 30, 19790
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presc-nts
to be executed -the day and year first above written.
APPROVED AS TO FORM BOARD OF RAMSEY COUNTY COKMISSLONERS
THIS DAY OF ,
19 By
Chairman
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY By
Chief Clerk - County Board
APPROVED
Executive Director
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
ss.
COUNTY OF R.AMSEY )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before-me tbi* s day of
19 by Chairman and
Chief Clerk of the Board of Ramsey County
Commissioners, a Minnesota Political Subdivision on behalf of the Corporation.
t ■
_4_
son
onstruction, Inc.
April 9, 1981
Barry Frans
City Manager
1380 Frost Avenue
Maplewood, Mn
Dear Mr. Evans:
In September 1979, we were approved for a tax emempt bond
for a racquetball club facility on Highway 36 and Atlantic Ave.
I was told we would have to go before the council again because
it has been over one year since we were approved.
j
S
i
E
The law firm of O'Connor & Hannan ' s bond council have stated
that they would be willing to give a bond opinion under the present
iii - nnesota law for the eonstruction . of a racquetball club,
T would like to request for a meeting to have a resolution
passed, calling for a public hearing authorizing the financing of a
racquetball club, through the use of a industrial revenue bond or
notes within the meetings of the Minnesota statues 474.
All the documentations required could be presented to the council
on or before April 16th meeting, including the application for approval
of the municipal industrial revenue bond or notes to the Department
of Commerce -- Security Division.
Please place this matter on the April 16th agenda. There was a
resolution passed September 1979 and due to the moratorium, we were
unable to develop under that resolution due to the time limit under
the state law.
f:
We have built and managed the Blaine Racquet Club, which has 18
employees and over 2,040 memberships, and the Plymouth Racquet Club
which employs 16 people and has 1725 in memberships. Both clubs have
been very successful and we feel that the Maplewood Club will be as
successful if not more because of the ocation
s
t
Sinc ly, '
og Hokanson
1451 92nd Lane N.E. • Blaine, MN 55434 • (612) 786 -3130
E
F -i
a
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat and Street vacation = ,
LOCATION: County Road C, east of Keller Parkway ( see encl os _ maps )
APPLICANT: Probe Engineering Co. , Inc.
OWER: Robert's Properties, Inc.
PROJECT: Carsgrove's Meadows
DATE: March 10, 1981
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL
Request
Approval of a preliminary plat and vacation of a portion of the Cypress Street
right -of -way.
Proposed Land Use
1. Sixty single family residential lots. Map 3 illustrates the proposed lot
configuration.
2. Proposed Forest Street would be the Only means of access, by paved public
street, to the site. Leol a Road, an unimproved 40 foot wide private drive
from Keller Parkway, is not being proposed for dedication or upgrading
(see map 2)
3. Forty - three feet of right -of -way for the south half of County Road C is
proposed for dedication.
4. A remnant parcel , west of proposed Forest Street is to be combined with the
applicant's property to the west (map 2)
BACKGROUND
Site Description_
Gross acreage: 21.7 acres
Net Acreage: 16.7 acres
Existing Land Use: Undeveloped
Existing Easements: A 40 foot wide ingress - egress easement that runs 473 feet
south from County Road C (see Map 2)
1
Su Land Uses
1 . Northerly: County Road C and single family dwellings.
2. Easterly:
a. A 3. 36 acre parcel , which runs 888.8 feet south from Count Road C.
parcel arcel i s occupied by a single dwelling home fronti nc n County
_
Road C. It is zoned Farm Residential and planned for 1 ow _ nsi ty
residential use.
b. The remainder of the east side of the plat is bordered by the undeveloped
Cypress Street right -of -way. The land on the east side of the right -of -way
is platted into seven undeveloped residential ial lots. These lots are zoned
R -1, Single dwelling Residential and planned for low density residential
use.
3. Southeasterly: The Maple Leaf Drive-In. It is zoned BC, Business Commercial
and planned RL, Low Density Residential use.
• 1.5 acre parcel. This property is undeveloped, except for
4. Southerly. An 1 p P
a single dwelling residence in the southeast corner, zoned F, Farm and planned
Residential Lower Density.
5. Westerly: Undeveloped ed 1 and owned b y the applicant. A preliminary plat for
. U p
28 single family dwellings has been submitted. The property is zoned for
Farm Residential and planned for Low Density Residential Extended use.
Past Actions
3 -2 -78: Council approved a preliminary plat for this property (Map 4) with the
following conditions
1. Provision by the developer, acceptable to the Council 1 , of two means of
access with improved City streets to all lots in the plat. Such project shat l
at least include the construction of Cypress Street from Connor Avenue to
Brooks Avenue. Leol a Road shall be excluded as a secondary access to the
plat.
2. Availability of municipal water to the plat.
3. Approval by the Engi neeri
PP ng Department of an engineering study that wi l i
establish the locations and capacities of all pertinent storm water retention
P Proposed onds i n the MApl ewood Drainage Plan . Such study s hall be financed
by the developer, under the direction of the City Engineer.
4. _Deeding of Outl of A to the property owners to the norty.
5. Combining Outl of C with the property to the west.
.S
6. Moving the west end of proposed Brooks Avenue 30 feet to the north to align
9 -
with the possible future alignment of a Leol a Road. _
7. Dedication of a street and utility easement for that portion of proposed
Forest Street which l i e s on the adjoining property to the west.
2.
8. The back slope in the cut area north of Connor Avenue shall be fully restored
after construction.
9. vacation of the 40 foot ingress-egress easement from County Road C.
10. Staff approval of a finished grading and drainage plan.
11. Compliance with the recommendation of
_Board in their letter of November 21,
120 = Engineering Department establish that
,high water problems.
13.- Applicant will signify his understand
the Ramsey- Washi ngton -flf� o watershed
1977.
there are no lots unbui 1 dabl e due to
i ng and acceptance of the above conditions.
14. The developer shall provide to the City an Environmental Assessment .Worksheet
meeting Minnesota Environmental Quality Board Standards and requirements
6- 21 -79: Council ordered the construction of Forest Street from County Road C to
Keller Parkway, Cypress Street from County Road C to Brooks Avenue, the interior
streets in the plat, and u t i l i t i e s in Gervai s Avenue. This project was not
constructed, because Mr. Nowi cki could not provide the required financing.
6 -5 80: Counci 1 approved a time extension and directed staff to update the
engineering feasibility study. (The update will consider the improvements required
for the present preliminary plat request),
1- 22 -81: Counci denied a time extension for the original proposal, on the basis
that:
1. The preliminary plat was approved almost three years ago.
2. There is no substantial evidence that the developer intends or has the ability .
to complete the plat.
3. The developer has submitted an application for a new plat for this property.
(The present application).
4. The feasibility study will be done on the basis of the new plat design.
DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS
P1 anni ng
1. Land Use Plan Designation: RL, Residential Low Density over the northern
two- thirds of the plat and School /Park over the southern one - third. The
Plan update proposes to replace the Park /School des i nation with an RL
9
designation.
2. The .maxi mum allowable density is 14 persons /net acre,
3. Proposed density is 14.7 persons /net acre
4. Zoning: F, Farm Residential
3
5. All proposed lots meet or exceed the minimum code requirements for area and
frontage.
6. Section 412.851 of the Minnesota State Statutes states that: The Co uncil 1 may
vacate any street, alley, public grounds, or any part thereof if it a
i n the interest of the public c to do so after appears
. P a hearing prece�, d by two weeks
published and posted notice.
Envi ronmental _ Y
I. �An Environmental Assessment Worksheet has been submitted
to the Environmental
Quality Board. A declaration, indicating no EIS is needed was published
March 2 1981. N f' � P i s hed on
No final action can be taken on the plat until 30 days follow-
in this publication.
y
2. The Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District reviewed the ro
p posed plat
and made the following comments:
"In reviewing the proposed plat for Carsgrove's Meadow in Maplewood, ewood
P it
was noted that on a few lots near the north end of the development an
area has been designated as a storm p
orm water retention area and sediment basin
in the City of Maplewood's Drainage Plan. This retention area has been
designated to have a storm water storage capacity of one acre foot t with a
peak discharge of one cfs. As this retention area is located in the 1
h Maplewood
Drainage Plan and it is a final quality control area rior to discharging '
Kohlman - Lake it is r p- rg1 ng � nto
probable the District will require that this and be
r�ai ntai ned with a storm water storage P
g capacit of one acre foot and a di
charge capacity of one cfs . "
3. The Soil Conservation Service has reviewed the ro proposed plat a '
P P P and indicated
cated
that "extreme care needs to be exercised in developing this site
to protect
future homeowners from high water table problems.' (Report enclosed)
Public Works
l . The City has a policy of requiring at least two means of access to a develop-
ment for emergency vehicle use, in case an access is blocked or under repair.
2. The Land Use Plan update ro oses Forest '
P p Street as a mayor collector through
this neighborhood.
3. County Road is planned as a 66 foot wide major collector street.
Since the
existing right-of-way is adequate, 10 foot of the ro osed right-of-way
should be i ncluded p p 9 way
n the plat.
4. Sewer fronts the plat in County Road C.
5. Water is not available. It. would have to be extended along 1 ng County Road C
from the west side of Highway 61 and looped through the plat,
9 P _
.s
6. Drainage easements should be rovi ded along P g l 1 i nes .
7. A grading permit from the Ramsey - Washington Metro Waters '
Watershed i - r equired,
4
P arks
A bike route /trail is proposed along County Road C
CONCLUSION
Analysis
The preliminary plat is consistent with the Land Use Plan. There r
a e no longer
any- plans to develop a school /park facility in the vicinity of this site, as
ref: ected in the Land Use Plan update.
Several considerations do, however, need to be resolved before a '
final plat is
approved. The most important of which concern the provision of a '
second public
access, the extension and looping of water through the 1 at and vacation
Cy ress Street, p of
P
There are at least three alternatives for a second means of ubl ' •
p � c access (trap 5} .
I. Improvement of Cypress Street, including looping n of water.
P 9 .
This alternative has the additional advantage of rov i di n a sec 1
P g and ��ea ns
of access to the existing homes on Cypress Street, as well as opening ng up
the potential for developing the remaining lots.
2. Extension of proposed Forest Street, south to Keller Parkw
This alternative has an additional advantage of allowing us
fanned major water to loop a
P transmission i on l i ne . This will l assure adequate pressure
for the entire area, q p
3. Development of Leola Road from proposed Forest Street
to Ke ller Pa t kway
This alternative would allow development f
o the property to the southwest.
Water would have to be looped to Keller Parkway and back to
provide County Road. C.
This would
p e water service to Car -Don Estates on Keller Parkway
Option 2, extension of Forest Street, was chosen when the applicant's
ref imi nar at was i previ ous
preliminary p 1 • th the road network given conditional approval. From the pers ecti ve of
consistency w� 1 ann p
planned for i n the Land Use Plan, this alternative
is desirable. Staff, however, recommends that the Counci n -
1 of make a decision
on a specific alternative, until the engineering feasibility 1 i t s
plat a Y tudy has been up-
dated. Final
p approval should not be granted, if Council does not order
of the above alternatives.
one
Secondly, vacation of Cypress Street must be approved prior '
pp P to final plat approval.
Vacation would result in a more desirable local street attern east
p �`t. A negative aspect of the - p of the proposed
P e vacation, i f vlou 1 d be the necessity to
repl at the area to the east, possibly reducing the numb
that= the public c inter g number of 1 ots ..= Staff believes
P interest would be served by the vacation of the right-of-way,
Recommendation
I Approval of the vacation of the Cypress Street right-of-way, •
ght of abutt� ng the east
l i n e of
the subject property.
Y
Approval is recommended on the basis that:
1. Vacation would allow for a more efficient roads stem and '
y platting arrangement.
2. The right -of -way is not necessary for the development of •
� . acent properties.
.
- -3. It is in the public interest to vacate. -
II.—Approval of the proposed preliminary mi nary l at, subject to '
_ P � conditions:
I. Council ordering whatever projects are necessary o provide
b Y p vide two means of
access
y improved City street, sanitary sewer, storm sewer wi th onds
and extend and loop a water l i n e throu gh the plat P '
.
2. Include the proposed remnant parcel located west of
the proposed Forest
Street, with the p l a t as an Outl ot. This Outl of shall be combi b� ned wi th
the property to the west. The metes and bounds ro ert description
1 at shat p P Y � or
the
P 1 be changed to reflect the inclusion of this . ro ert
P P .Y
3. Vacation of the 40 foot ingress-egress easement south from County Road C
4. Dedication of a street and utili easement for that
portion of proposed
Forest Street which lies on the adjoining ro ert to t
P P y he west.
5. Staff approval of a finished grading and drainage 1a
plan.
6. Dedication of 33 feet rather than 43 feet for the south half of County
Road C.
7. Transfer of the .7 persons /net acre density excess t '
property to the west,
y o the applicant's
8. Drainage easements shall be dedicated along the back l '
g of lines, as per
the City E ngi n eer's direction,
9. Compliance with the recommendations of the Soil Conserv ' on Serve ce,
dated November 21, 1977.
10. Final plat approval cannot be r
PP granted until the EAw process has been
completed.
11. Submission of a signed developer's agreement inc '
� ud� ng two temporary
cul-
12. Dedication of 10 foot temporary road way easements
- Y eats on the north and south
s of
the easterly 60 feet of proposed Connors and Delmont
pur purposes of temporary - Avenues for
P p y cul de -sacs . These easements are to be separate
from the plat. _ p
.
Encl osures:
1. Location Ma =
P
2. Property Line Map
3. Preliminary Plat
40 March 1978 Preliminary Plat Proposal
5. Secondary p
n ary Access Alternatives
6.. SCS Report
7. Vacation Resolution
O
BEAM �:
7 60
Koh Irn c n:-
Lake
23
V T"2-1 v_: I
KOHLMAN AVE. H
c
V
7:
ROAD c L
V)
LJ
LL)
< z
DEMC'N
u <
< >- IBROOKI 7
cr
cr uj
4
93D
S E _` �AINT A
GERVAIS AV E. W 1 L F
G �ANDVIEW I I'AVE.
IVIKING IE
SHERREN A vE
COPE AVE
72 rF
LARK AVE. LAR AVE
F
RAY NOWICKI
PETITIONER
PRELIMINARY PLAT
REQUES
r /
AVE. SE
0
1. LO MAP
0.
K4 f
/10 ! : •6C+ �
C
v
40 foot wide
ingress-egress easement s
AL
� E
a -- — � _ _ — s•SG clt 77
Remnant Parcel ; A
(To be combined _
the parcel to the
west)
IF
Ir
1
. :C ON N OR AVE
t -
c
Q
LLJ
1• i
t
u
t
'BROOKS AVE.
F
s
i
4 �
3 ,r V. ,. .1 /
,
i
Cv
, A sa
�3t
CC
RAY NOWICKI _
PETITIONER
PRELIMIfdARY PLAT
REQUEST
2. PROPERTY LINE MAP
4
a
- - - - - _ cam. � - s �.•.vT U.,. � - � - - - - -
•
A ,• /
It
Z i
1 I r � C •
t .r r _'t— d2
df
i I• .
• s
i' ...� .. •�"j� • 1 •
• - I
� r .• 2 s
= S
A
3. PRELIMINARY PLAT
s o
rn
� D
r
�r
C�
ft
- m
2
it _
db
blow
•
F
1 �
t � �
A&
&ft 1
HER
LAST- - -- t -
w ..
• • , •
Ln
CIS
rrl
• • - • 40
ba
•i•
s _DE L` CriT �... EAST :
ti
T"1 � � Ir r � - Y • � � Q 1.
• • "t r f � - V r I
• N •.•
• H i
i .
s a T — — j — • 1 — �' S rra
• ..-- ` ••. fi Rt 1
I L
Jam w tie �► �.
- - -, --
= SEX7AW AVEMX E it ST s
_ a a Z.54
4. MARCH, 1978 PRELIMINARY PLAT PROPOSAL
N
BEAM;
6
22
_ �_ _ '� �, mot•. Y '= Ko h i f o n _ =-
L o k e -
NN
J N
A
f �
i
,I 1
A- Al to rn a to #1
B - Alternate #2
C- Alternate 7- 3'
AVE. J
BEAM
:V
1 7 o .
KOHLM-AN AVE.
d �
- .'JKTY ROAD '•Cr t
r
J c J
J W }-
c
Z -
ji W Z
1 / W
� Q
n Q Z L^ Y-
u
O!
V c
Q I SROOK 4 vE .I
61 - �' Lu
Q
CD
SE XTA ' 1 NT r
GcRVAlS A V E. E=
f
G AtiCViEW
3� V�K iNC DR.
r- SHERREN A _
♦ ' DOPE _
_ - =AV -
O LARK AVE. F L ARK - AVE
J _ a
.s
5. ALTERNATIVES FOR SECOND PUBLIC ACCESS
1
IL 016,
�A
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RAMSEY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Mid - America Bonk Building, 1827 North Saint Paul Road,
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109. Telephone (612) 777 -0127
KNovember 21, 1977
T0: Siinervisors, Ramsey Soil and "at er Conservation District
F M.A. Duane M. Zl iers
S� J CT: Plat Review of Carsgrove t s Yeadow In ' -'.ap' ewood
I have reviewed the coi +►ents of our District Conservationist,
Mr !,* oechnig, in relation to the above plat arid concur in his findings.
F>: t rcme care needs to be exercised in developing this si `e to protect
fz�ture h=2owners from high water table prol)lerns. As mentioned in the
rr j:ort, the area 1TLapped as 132D and 123 are marginal building sites
hcLause of steep slopes or high mater tab -le, i"ne City should provide
proper inspection during construction to see that adequate measures are
provided to protect future home owners from high wa ter table and /or
settlement problems.
R.ecorn
- andations regarding wetlands also need to be emphasl.zed.
The City sr,ould provide proper inspection to protect the wetlands from
sediment during and after construction. Thev sl)ould also provide for
maintaining the wetlands in their present state as nearly as possible.
Careful wetland preservation Will protect and control do -nstraam areas.
Sincerely,
Duane M. Zwiers, Supervisor
.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
t. J
r; i; 'section 4 0
tie -
v/ 1junci the ow r, e rs
on of a f d
abu e t a ny' I l e y/ D 0 S d to 51 e J, er g
Z C L
E-? d r, p
A and pos. I Doses
n C1 U1 t he
i
-+
n
"i d e x ce p JL- thig 783.75 feet
, tv
A 01
�T
MIA!
i
m eet- of the
h
ON
C T
p L
N 4"
-j T
38.8 o'
s e c . -9 T W
IC i 1 fi rds n v 1i-
S t OT
E -'E SOLVED, b the r i t r
r
al 1 e r e v a k
s r e,, r, d be d
a e a no"-ice of C C "
o pr L to is e
r P(-, r
1, a sLatutes, Sec tiun 12 S�) 0 G J s �i a
n '-I S 1 P r Y'e S
1
t Auditor 'I o r- i s L -
Ali th h t r
C e
Y'ai
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
REGARDING A PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LAND
Notice is hereby given that the Maplewood City Council has declared
a public hearing for April 16, 1981 at 7:00 P . M. in the Council Chambers
of the Maplewood Municipal Building located at 1380 Frost Avenue, Maplewood.
The purpose of said hearing is to consider all public remarks regarding
a proposed subdivision plat proposed by:
SUBDIVIDER:
Probe Engineering Co. , Inc.
1000 East 146th Street
Burnsville, Minnesota 55337
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The E 60' of the N 473' of the
NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Sec.9,
T 29 R 22, together with the W
1/2 of the E 112 of the NW 1/4
of Sec. 9 T. 29 22, lying N
of the S 10 acres thereof ex
the following described property:
Beg on the N L of said W 1/2 of the E 1/2 of the NW 1/4 distant 247.50' E
of the NUJ corner thereof; thence S parallel with the W L of said W 1/2
of the E 1/2 of the NW 1/4, a distance of 888.80'; thence N 89055'30" E
parallel with the N L of said W 1/2 of the E 1/2 of the NW 1/4, a distance
of 416.10' to the E L there0-f, , thence N 00 E. along said E L, a
distance of 880.80' 'to the N L of said W 1/2 of the NW 1/4; thence S.
89 W. along said N L, a distance of 416.10' to the point of beginning,
also ex beginning at a point on the W L of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 distant
473.00' S of the NE corner thereof; thence N 89 E a distant of 63.75",
thence S a distance of 214.96'; thence Sly along a circular curve concave to
the W,havi ng a radius of 320.00' and a central angle of 17 a distance
of 94.95'; thence S 17 W a distance of 160.00'; thence Sly, along a
circular curve concave to the E, having a radius of 245.09' and a central
angle of 00 a distance of 10.45' to the W L of said NE 1/4 of the
NW 1/4; thence N, along said W L. a distance of 471.46' to the point of
beginning
NUMBER OF LOTS PROPOSED:
ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER
60 dwelling lots
ARE INVITED TO ATTEND AND BE HEARD
t
4-f`
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
STREET VACATION
Notice is hereby given, that the Maplewood City Council at
its meeting of Thursday, April 16, 1981 at 7:00 P.M. i n the
Council Chambers of the Maplewood Municipal. Building located
at 1380 Frost Avenue, Maplewood, w i l l consider and publicly
hear remarks regarding a proposal to vacate Cypress Street
from Connor Avenue to Brooks. Avenue,
ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER
ARE INVITED TO ATTEND AND BE HEARD
.z
i
v i
M E M O R A N D U M
F.. d Z
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Street and Alley Vacation =�
LOCATION: Connor Avenue, Hazel Street, and alley on the w
White es terdy side of
Bear Avenue (see enclosed map) -
APPL LCANT : H. Stanley Wes s i n
DATE: -March 12, 1981
7 .
SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL
R e quest
The vacation of Connor Avenue, Hazel Street, and the i ntersecti
ng alley west of
White Bear Avenue and south of County Road C.
BACKGROUND
Description of Right- Of -G1a
1. Connor fl.venue: 120 by 60 feet of undeveloped right-of-way
2. Hazel Street: 270 b 3 f 9 y
y 3 feet of undeveloped right-of-way
3. Alley: 100 by 20 feet of undeveloped right -of -wa
Surroundinq Land Uses
Northerly: Office Building
Southerly: Undeveloped property planned for LSC, Limited Service v� ce Commerce al Center
and zoned BC, Business Commercial'
Easterly: White Bear Avenue and the Burnet Realty Building
Westerly: Undeveloped _ ed r y g
y p property planned for LSC and zoned BC
n 4- n - j- _ _
10 - 4 -79: Co.unci 1 approved the vacation of Connor Avenue ea '
east of .�h � to Bear Avenue
and also that portion of the subject alley on the east side of '
Why to Bear Avenue..
DEPARTIMENT CONSIDERATIONS
Plan ning
1 . Land Use Plan Designation: LSC
2. Zona ng: BC
3. According to state statute, in order for Council to vacate pubi i c. ri ght -of -way,
it m in be found that doing so would be n the interest of
the public.
Public Works
It
1. The subject rights -of -way is not needed for transportation purposes
2 . There are no u t i l i t i e s in these rights -of -way
AM
CONCLUSION
Anal Y5 i s
These rights -of -way do not serve any public purpose and are not planned to be used for
vehi *cul ar or pedestrian traffic.
Recommendation
Approval to vacate Connor Avenue, Hazel Street, and the alley, all of which are located
on the westerly side of White Bear Avenue in block 6, Mlapl ewood Addition. The vacations
are found to be in the public interest, since these rights -of -way serve no public need
Enclosed:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line Map
3. Resolution
2-
- � r
1 / f
f�
o
rOJNTY ROAD
T30NR22W W YNN Avg
34 (3)
3 ' LY:)i A
T
LYDIA MY
T29%R22W
cr wl
L AN t
-- -•• - -- - _ Jw . . _.a _... _ �_ �- - - - - -
>
A
cr
AVE.
it .r
It
LU
0
�� ; �' f 0 >
En
3r
ki A N AVE' KC04L MAN A E.
cl
LJ I
c Y
\ 0
-� � V,. � � � � to ►- _ � � � i t -�-' F
F
A D. V4
A�
:-- � rX
E 140 N T A V
lu D
A E.2
44
AVF AVE*
m
X
A T V
AV E. VA IS AVE . J, :7-=
G D',P'i E 7
Ei6
J
S�ERFEN AYEl
�:rN AVE.
COPE1 I AVE COPE AVE.
LARK AVE LARK I A V E .
�_ , A
N771 -L;R iE LR 0,_j
cr
LAJ
25 ii
[AVE.
L :
IT -
f L,� , 4 ► 5 ° ! �'1 !
K E AVE. E
0
D I D 6 AVE. • o oc,
PjBLIC W'D�- .S
l
R ::� c►�
ilrLMONJIT --- AVE. w > BLDG.
> Pi X
IS KILL WA Of AVE. y � 6 �
u U HAR PUS
5 0 0 .
Ros 1"00D AVE. - � .�
A
0
d
4
4 00 r,.JP .
STANICH C'
NORTH ST.
LOCATION MAP
4
•- e
°b I Iv
f f
.. t • i . � � _mil ' � I � t
_
0 A
•A �
/� � � j - } 1 � .';"�► f • � i t T
? L ( '� > r te ► . .•t. �.
OF
0-0
-r 4 — 9X3
F
_ a�xei D
do
..1
elA
0
1 v
f
k PROPERTY LINE MAP
J
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes S
. on � Section 412-851, thereof,
the Maplewood Ci Council, upon petition of a majority of
J y the owners of the land
abutting Connor Avenue, Hazel Street and the alley proposed
public s p P to be vacated, and
after a
p hearing preceeded by two (2} weeks published and osted notice, pro-
poses the vacation of the following described cri bed undeA P undeveloped ConnQ4 venue , Hazel
Street and the abutting alley all lyi ng an the westerl
y si o �i e �� i to Bear Avenue
TO W.1 T:
: .
PROPERTY AFFECTED BY STREET VACATION =`
Lots 15 and 16, Block 6 and Lot 5, Block 7 Maplewood Addition
Un platted Lands: p ition
P
Ex N 455 ft. part of NW 1/4 of NE 1/ 4 of NW i
/ 1/4 Wly of White Bear Avenue n
Section 11, Township 29, Range 22
Subject to Ave part Wly of CL of Ave of S 4 acres of W 112
1 / of NE 1/4 of NW 1/4 of
Section 11, Township 29, Range 22
Subject to Co. Rd. C the E 230 ft of NW 1/4 of NW 1/4 f •
/ o Section 11, Township 29
Range 22
PROPERTY AFFECTED BY THE ALLEY VACATION
Lots 13 - 18, Block 6, Maplewood Addition
WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council finds that the vacation of the
above descr � b
.� ed
street and alley, are in the interest of the public due to cha raging , land uses and
obsolete platting
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Ci ty Counci 1 Ram '
� Ramsey County, Minnesota,
that the above described bed Connor Avenue, Hazel Street and alley be and h
Clerk is here hereby are,
vacated and the City y directed to prepare a notice of completion
of the proceedings pursuant to the p rovi si ons ons of
p Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851
thereof,
and shall cause the same to be presented to the Coun u ty Auditor for entry
upon his transfer records and the same shall be thereafter fi l.ed with the Ramse
County Recorder. y
I
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
STREET AND ALLEY VACATION
Notice is hereby given that the Maplewood City Council
at its meeting of Thursday, April 16, 1981 at 7:15 P.M. i n
the Council Chambers of the Maplewood Municipal Building
located at� 1380 Frost Avenue, Maplewood, will consider and
publicly hear remarks regarding a proposal to vacate Hazel
S ' reet, north of Connor Avenue, and Connor Avenue, west of
!- hi to Bear Avenue and that portion of the alley lying west
1
of i4hi to Bear Avenue in Block b, Maplewood Addition.
ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER
ARE INVITED TO ATTEND AND BE. HEARD
00 -3
n
3
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Manager
FROM:. Director of Community Development
.�
.Y pmen t
SUBJECT:
Mortgage Revenue Note Financing
LOCATION: Highway 61 and Beam Avenue 7.
APPLICANT OWNER: BKM Management Company
PROJEET: Toyota Dealership
DATE:- March 24, 1981
SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL
Request
Approval of the tax exempt mortgage revenue note financing in the amount of 5900,000.
Proposed Land Use
1. A 17,000 square foot building containing offices
service department. showroom, and a parts and
BACKGROUND
Site Description
1. Site Size: 3.94 acres
2. Existing Land Use: There is an existing house on t •
process of be' he site which is in the
p being removed.
Surrounding Land Uses
Northerly: Beam Avenue. North of Beam are two single-dwelling '
homes.
Southerly: An open drainage channel to Kohlman
Lake.
Easterly: Highway 61
Westerly: A single - family home.
1. 1- 18 -79: Council approved a Plan amendment special
� exception, and project plans.
The-special
exception is approved, provided that:
a. No building permits are issued unless •
s .Beam Avenue � s upgraded to at least
the west property l i n e of the subject parcel 3
b. A 15 foot drainage easement i s rove ded
P along the east and wept property line
Project plans were approved, subject to the following conditions:
a. No building permits are issued, unless Beam Avenue is upgraded to at least
the west property l i n e of the subject property
A
b. A 15 foot drainage easement is provided along the east and vt.'e's property lines
c: Sodding of the green areas adjacent to Beam Avenue
d. Provide 10 foot wide by 20 foot deep parking stalls for public parking
e. Installing concrete curbing around the perimeter of the parking and drives
f . Lights shall not shine directly onto a public street or adjacent properties
or cause undue glare that may cause a nuisance to drivers
g. Approval by the City Engineering Department of the drainage plan and the final
design of the proposed sediment pond
h. Submitting of a revised landscaping plan for review and approval by the
Community Design Review Board of the City. Installation of l andscapi ng may
be delay ed unti 1 the location of the storm sewer pipe i s detc ,�;,i ned . I f this
decision is not made until after an occupancy permit is issued, a security
agreement, such as a bond or cash escrow, may be required.
i The exterior trash enclosure shall be constructed of masonry materials to
match the building
j. A 12 foot walkw easement and an eight foot asphalt path shall be provided
along the east property line from Beam Avenue to ditch 18
k. A sanitary sewer from the proposed building shall be connected to the
existing sanitary sewer on the east side of Highway 61
1. The owner and applicant shall agree to the above conditions in writing
2. Since Council approval, the applicant has won court cases against the Ramsey-
Washington Metro Watershed Board and the U. S. Corps of Engineers.
3. 5- 15 -80: Council amended their decision on the special exception and plan review
by stating that, "Toyota could commence construction of their building, subject
to the original conditions with the following r e v i s i o n :
The upgrading of Beam Avenue required in the special exception and plan review
shall be defined as sanitary sewer service to the building from the east side
of Highway 61 and the ' 1 imi ted improvement of the street from Highway 61 to the
west driveway entrance. All work to be approved by the City Engineer."
4. 11 -3 -80: Council approved of revenue note financing for the Datsun dealership
under construction on Highway 61. do
5. 3-19-81: Council awarded the construction contract to provide sanitary sewer
from the east side of Highway 61 at Beam Avenue to the west end of Beam Avenue.
It will also extend northerly to Gulden's Supper Club.
- 2 -
Planning
1 . Land Use Plan Designation: LSC, Limited Service Commercial Center
2. Zani ng : M-1, Light Manufacturing
3 . Commercial revenue note e l i g i b i l i t y guidelines:
A. The project shall be compatible with the overall development plans 'of the City,
including the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning, and Community Design Review Board
standards
B. The project shall not require a significant amount of public expenditures
for City improvements such as roads, sewers, and watermains
C. The project shall involve an existing business that the City wishes to
expand or a new business which the City wishes to attract:
1. Existing Business Criteria
Any expansion, relocation, or rehabilitation of an existing business
2. New Business Criteria
a. Offers significant new employment opportunities, based upon the
nature of the use, on a year around basis, or
b. The project involves the rehabilitation of a vacant or scheduled
to be vacated structure, or
c. The proposed location i s within a designated development or
redevelopment target area, and
d. Possesses a ., low potential for creating pollution.
D. The number of businesses of the same general nature in the area of the
proposed project shall be considered in determining the need for commercial
revenue note financing.
E. The note shall be for an issue of not less than $300,000.
F.. Construction must begin within one year of preliminary approval.
Fin ancial
1. The applicant has signed an agreement to pay all costs involved in the review
and financing of the proposed project. A commercial revenue note does not
constitute a charge, l i e n , or encumbrance upon any property of tie C.Yty,' except
the project. The note would not be a charge against the City Os general credit
or taxing powers, but is payable from sums to be paid by the applicant.
- 3 -
2. Critics believe the tax exempt revenue bond and note program contributes t
0
higher interest rates for
conventional municipal bonds for
Public improvements.
the loss of federal and state
A secondary public cost � s
income tax revenues.
3 • Payment must be made for a deferred water assessment of
$1 ,615.35'
,Plus interest.
CONCLUSION
Anal
s s
The following refer to the criteria as outlined in the el i
commercial r teri i•
revenue note financing: g b� 1 i ty guidel i nes for
A. Council has already established
Y the Toyota dealership's •
h� P s campat� b� 1 i ty with the
overall development plans oft
he City by approving n a special '
site. 9 p i al exception for
the
B• The
west
. g he i •
City . is requiring ri n t improvement of Beam Avenue
driveway, and also, the in from Highway 61 to To ota's
s tal 1 ati y
bear
though
the cost on of sanitary sewer.
of Y
paving Beam Avenue to the West driveway.
i t i s required
The App1 i
The
cant w i l l
red f
q or the Toyota dealership, i s
by a r ed property ot�rn - ers to also so a
- lent replace failing i ng on
sane tar y sewer,
result t of a petition
'
p tion
+1
area
-si to systems
of vacant property. Si nce t Y ms
than the his project will serve a
Toyota property, this •
and to allow
si 9n� f cantly
develop-
1 anger
no Le
criteria
f I nand ng a should not be
used to den
.
y
r evenue
C•2 The proposed use off •
offers significant gn1 f� cant new enrol oyr�ent o!?!�or
employees) . to n i t i es (40 fu l l � time
C-2-d- The project oss • a l for creating
the p es ses a low Potential ' •
project includes udes a sediment and � n9 pollution. ut� on . In addition,
pond skimming device to lessen •
run -off into Kohlman Lake. an potential
for Pollution from
D • The criteria considering deri n " the number of businesses of
i n the g
area � s vague enough to all the same general nature
car dealerships i ow wide interpretation. on. There
n this s area . This, however �.! are a number of
oul d be the on y Toyota dealership.
E • The requested financing exceeds the minimum amount of
$300,000.
F. Construction i s ro os ed
p P to begin April 17, 1981.
Recommendation
Preliminary approval of tax
of $900900 0• A exempt mortgage revenue note financing
Approval i s subject to the following in the amount
conditi
ions,
1 • Construction must begin '
9 n wi thin one year of prel i mi nar -
y a pprova 1. _.
2• Payment of the deferred
water assessment of $ plus i nterest.�
Enclosures: =-
1. Location Map
2• Property Line Map
- 4 -
, /* ,
VADNAIS HEIGHTS 61 � S T _ _ -:. _ .
77-
SPARKL
AUTO
O � �• r r
z
IV
0
4
IL
b E A M
'7-7- AVE. BEAM
60
TOYOTA
Ln
SITE
Ko h Imon —
Lohe p
Loke P ORSCHE —
LLJ
_j
F-
F-
_j
W A N E
R C Au
_j
cr Lkj
CL z iL>
9L
z
L)
cr
y �, < i v z D E M.
lu
DATSUN
LA V? E
22
61 J cr
or,
w
E l A �T
On �..�%
GERVAIS
L AV E.
G :.,YfE V r
ICE'
!V.,K IN D R.
W
i
cc
z
>_ 25
SURKE AV,
AV.
SE=LMOPV
4 4.
KILLWAN
ion I . ENwd
COUNTRY
SIDE
V A
I LELAN�j
_jj
'10 N
L =
U
VE.
S S H ERREN AVE avE
P E . LARK
...............
J FLAJRIE D z
"I I
I e-
2
V)
L x LA V E. BL
ELDRIDG i -AVE J �
AVE.
C6.
S—kILL M Avg
LOCATION MAP
ti
i it
GULDENS
RE STAU RANTT,?
IS 4 o.c t r.
f� o
I le
C ,
at � a
i
rr
Cot
rl
rqL
4j in
3
--
t
, It 1 7 j A t oo, r - - - - -- - - - - AY E , , - - - - -
4 1 BEAM —---
� J
t� to
! ', TOYOTA ,,..:,: i
v
CA 14
it G ftr
';9 or)
_
S I T E' ,� I
or
i ►O toy j
_)) t i � I S ^' i rte^ + ►.
S tar
i
•.at....,.a. ►•w•t►a Ar i.n � �'rl v � - - -- -- -- _
, 0
0
ir
•
PROPERTY LINE MAP
i
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development- -
SUBJE.CT: Variance_ - Floor Area
LOCATION: Phyl i Court - Lot 6, Block 2 =_
APPLI-C /OWNER: Son.nen . Brothers Construction
DATE April 2, 1981
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL
Request
Approval of a variance to construct a single - family dwelling with less than the
required minimum floor area.
Proposal
1. Constructi on of a tri -level single-family detached dwelling with an attached
24 x 24 foot garage
2. Floor area, for Code purposes, would be 975 square feet
3. The floor plan is unusual in that the mass of the structure is not readily
apparent from the street
Site Description
1. Size: An irregular shaped lot of approximately 11,600 square feet
2. Existing land use: Undeveloped
Surrounding Land Use
North Phyl i s Court cul-de-sac. Across the cul-de-sac, several single - family homes
East: A single-family dwelling
South: Undeveloped property
West: A single - family dwelling
Past Actions
9 -19 -80 The applicant was mistakenly issued a building permit for the same floor plan
at 15$7 Sandhurst Drive. The dwelling has been completed and is occupied
DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS
Planning
1. Land Use Plan Designation: RL, Residential. Lower Density
2. Zoning: R1, Residential District {Single Dwelling}
3. Policies from the Land Use Plan (Plan Update) page 12 -5 maintain or strengthen
the character of individual neighborhoods
4. Compliance with Land Use Laws
A. Statutory:
Section 462.357 Subdivision 6 (2) states that the Board of A — eal s and
P�
adjustments is empowered to hear requests for variances from the literal
=- provisions of the ordinance in instances where:
1 . Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances
unique to the individual property
2. Where it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping i n with the
spirit and intent of the ordinance
B. Ordinance:
1 . Code presently does not specify a minimum floor area for tri - 1 evel d w e l l i n g s .
The bi -level minimum has been used in the past.
2. Section 904.010(6) states that the overall dimension of the first floor
of a bi -level dwelling shall not be less than 960 square feet.
Public Works
Water and sewer are available
CONCLUSION
Analys i s
Code. presently does not specify minimums for tri -1 evel dwellings. The bi -1 evel
floor area requirement has been used in the past due to the relative similarit
in construction, as compared to one and two story dwellings.
In the near future, a code amendment will be before the Council, which will include
a minimum floor area requirement of 975 square feet for tri -1 evel dwellings. wellings. The
applicant's proposal would be consistent with the proposed minimum.
The purpose of minimum floor area requirements is to maintain housing mass of ,
approximately the same size throughout a neighborhood.. An assump of the Code is
that property values . would be adversely affected by an intermixing of substantially
different si zed housing t es � y
g yp . The proposed dwelling i ng would not differ substantial
in mass' from exi housing stock.
Although the applicant has no legal justification for a variance from. code
it is recommended that the requested variance be ranted i n light granted, of�the fact that
mi nimum floor area requirements are likely to be reduced in the near Future. It
will likely be several months before the hearings for he
g t proposed code are completed.
Requiring the applicant to wait until the, process is completed would constitute an
unnecessary delay.
- 2 -
Recommendation
Approval of the requested floor area variance, on the basis that:
1 . No floor area minimum presently exists for tri -level dwellings
2. Toe proposed floor plan is consistent with proposed revisions t " the zoning code
3. Rtaqui ri ng the applicant to wait until the Council completes its review of the
code amendment proposal, would consti tu.te an unnecessary hardship
4. The mass of the prototype structure at 1587 Sandhurst Drive is compatible
with other development in the neighborhood
r _..i - _...___
1. Location Map
2. Property Line Map
3. Applicant's letter of Justification
- 3 -
LOWER AFTON RD.
Q39)
Lo bliDIN
LA.
o
(4)
MAILAND RD.
CL
(1) LAKE-*3OD DR.
(2) TEAKWCAD DR.
(3) CRESMEW IA.
(411 OAKRIDGE DR.
(5) HiLL*OOD DR.
L 1 W 0 0 D AVE.
WE
OA HL A
DA HL
CT
LO
0
vA
RZIW
PHYL
H! GSH W
D
fit) i
A
(4) -IM7
1(25)
�
1,:D
0 ic)
Z5 )
Ul
72,
C�94
1) Cr
1AVE.
:f:i E:
TZ
6EF !1
:AVE
25)
SCUTHC 54"; ;-A.
72
Carver
Loke
0 0 X W 000 AVE.
4 11
Z,
Z �� .
0 72
_21 CARVEh
4
i
1
i
......................
ro
� =- s t
1 J
. . - ''� - -` •, �`. j yr' � i `'' a. _ . �., .:� ; -,:r . aA �t,
i r•
' WOODS D D. r•7 50 :Zz
t u o y o 3 C-
3 2 I_
3
NJ-
p r
' ''�� �• ~• ti• SOS G7�ee, @' �
2
go
V
17. t7tG
t
s
i
/ G O •O i
t
-- � : '- .Z �
1
•
t
{
I
f
. G
I
......................
ro
� =- s t
1 J
. . - ''� - -` •, �`. j yr' � i `'' a. _ . �., .:� ; -,:r . aA �t,
i r•
' WOODS D D. r•7 50 :Zz
t u o y o 3 C-
3 2 I_
3
NJ-
p r
' ''�� �• ~• ti• SOS G7�ee, @' �
2
go
V
17. t7tG
88 . D O
/ G O •O i
. -► '
-- � : '- .Z �
. — -
—' "
. 3 t �. t� t'� _
PROPERTY LINE MAP
t
t�
t
! :f
{
i
Y
i
f
ir
� _ cc „p(,. � • � z � � � - F .L'r s. t "t:' • � � , r ' ✓, i ' � � i � �
SIB if
y21 a l rr 1� qq _. •� K.. \ y U
�f
T T
D
'r VK! I . f D S 1 W.
HOf4 d,M
2211 Valley View Place St. Paul, MN 55119 738 -3285
T
INC.
Dear Sirs,
.E',Ce e %�y' �'�e SLl b:il t a Se V Oi l a.nS iO a. �3ety� h t0 ,;01 i�1 iu n ✓ems t . •
' , i, V enture Z i rI Lam.+ ( �.t� i �/ 1 o 1 1, i a i .^: �� �`
The rol e , to be JL:i 1 on lo ' C 0, bloc 2 , ti �ture ., oa��. coo .
The i - i ome is a spli t level vii LI 12 i s uGre' f inished area, Y�i th a I wo car
a t E_cne �araoe . the - e nmi t V� c^�S Beni e d on the �roun : s i t d id loot gave �r3e
;. � re 00 a o�,:i � �e �,:�_in Floor, ;:�e �=� ' Tyr -� .�s�. -�._� 1 a
1�:1.ni t r C=)
r Q re Q V �.: `' CV o� Li V
-U
ior�_e sir;'��.la.r at 187 Sar�uhur t, ile��rToO
. ^
-, e are askinn I o r a variance on his s�j . Z oo a ,--- e re�ui rep ian� � o l+ ii
ecause �,•y 11ave allreac y purchased the tjro ;e r ty �, SOS t17e hom and Ob i,c� =7�u
a i "_or a e •
„` have allrea��y invested a great deal of ti::�e an :�ione;,� in This ��ro�ect,
C_na your reco �endation of dr- ntln�, a variance tiwou.�d ►tee V reatl- J Qu i �.ci� �, �e:�.
Sincerel
/ ! ` �'" � � '..+- `_.ice ,ie•�_'_"� r ....t -
i
s
14
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
FOR A CODE VARIANCE
The Maplewood Board of Adjustments and Appeals will conduct a public
hearing on , Thursday, April 16, 1981 at 7:45 P.M. i n the Council
Chanters of the 101aplewood t1unicipal Building, 1380 Frost Avenue.
PETITION INITIATOR: Sonnen Brothers Construction
2211 Valley View Place
St. Paul, Minnesota 55119
REQUEST: Construct a dwelling with
less square footage than
permitted by code.
PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS: Lot 6, Block 2, Venture
Woods Addition
ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER
ARE INVITED TO A AND BE HEARD
If you have questions or would l i k e further information, call
Geoff Olson at 770 -4560
s
s
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: " Amendment of City Ordinance - Garage Size'
DATE: April 9, 1981
Staff feels that our garage size ordinance is restrictive and should be recon-
sidered. The purpose of the ordinance is to keep the sizes of garages in pro-
portion to the house and houses on adjacent properties. Setting an absolute
maximum, such as 750 square feet, overly restricts the garage size for large
homes. It would be more reasonable to set the maximum garage area as a per-
centage of the house floor area, with an upper limit. The enclosed ordinance
also allows each home a garage area of at least 768 square feet.
Staff feels that allowing a garage to be 75 of the dwelling's floor area is
reasonable, and enforcing an upper limit of 1000 square feet, will limit garages
from getting too large. One thousand square feet is the largest garage per-
m i tted by the Uniform Building Code without going to a more restrictive category.
Refer to the enclosed survey of surrounding communities. Staff feels that this
proposal is in line with the requirements of neighboring communities.
Existing Ordinance
Section 916.010 (18). PRIVATE GARAGE Private garage means a building, shed
or enclosure or a part thereof designed or used for the shelter or storage of
motor vehicles and having a floor area not exceeding 750 square feet, outside
dimensions.
Recommendation
Approval of the ordinance amendment for maximum allowable garage size, on the
basis that setting an absolute maximum, such as 750 square feet, overly restricts
the garage size for larger homes.
i-
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 916 OF THE
MAPLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE BY REPLACING
SECTION 916.010 (18)
i
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 916.010 (18) of the Maplewood Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
(18) PRIVATE GARAGE. A private garage is an accessory building designed or
used for the shelter or storage of motor vehicles. A private garage
may not exceed an area of 75 percent of the total floor area of the
dwelling or 1000 square feet, wh-ichever is less. Private garages may
not exceed one story in height. Not withstanding the size provisions
of this section, a garage area of at least 768 square feet shall be
allowed for houses under 1,000 square feet.
Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force after its
passage and publication.
Passed by the City Council of the
City of Maplewood, Minnesota,
this day of 1981.
Mayor
Attest: ayes -
Nays -
Cl erk
a
SURVEY OF SELECTED COMMUNITIES
s_
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE GARAGE SIZE
MUNICIPALITY
(figures in square feet)
1.
New Brighton
Attached 1000 -•
-
de to ched 600
2.
_
Coon Rapids
760 or 75/ of the floor area of the
dwelling whichever is greater. No
garage shall exceed 1200 square feet.
3.
Little ' ttl e Canada
1000
4.
Woodbury
1000
5.
White to Be ar Lake
'
7.50
6.
New Hope
900
7.
North St. Paul
100 of the lot area but shall not
square feet.
exceed 1008 q
8.
Blaine
832
9.
Brooklyn Center
75 °� of the f 1 oar area of the dwelling
feet
but not to exceed 900 square
10.
Oakdale
No l i m i t
s_
A0
MEMORANDU
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Public Works
T,
DATE: April 9, 1981 '
r
SUBJECT: PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PETITION
ENGLISH STREET NORTH OF KOHLMAN AVENUE
At the April 2, 1981 Council Meeting, staff was requested
to investigate circumstances surrounding the ordering of
the feasibility study for Project 79 -4, English Street south
of County Road "C". More specifically, was the petition
sponsor required to pay for the feasibility study? The
following is a short summary of the events leading to a
Council action ordering that project.
A property owner requested a lot split along unimproved
English Street. The request was denied because no street
access was available. The property owner was then advised
to petition for the improvement. The property owner did
petition and a feasibility study was ordered. No arrangement
was made for the petition sponsor to pay for the study. The
project is being constructed and the feasibility study cost
will be recovered through assessments.
It is apparent from the records that no financial guarantee
was required for the previous English Street project. A few
comments, however, are in order. The previous project was
considered two years ago, in 1979. Since that time economic
conditions for the City have changed and must be taken into
consideration. Another item to give serious consideration
is the actual purpose of a feasibility study. One of its main
functions is to determine in a general way the economic
feasibility of the improvements. In the current situation
where two property owners are requesting improvements so that
lots can be sold, it does not seem to be the City's responsibility
to pay for that determination. If the improvement costs from
the feasibility study are considered too high, the petitioners
have their answer all at the public's expense.
'" ".`,
C;)
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Public Works
DATE March 26, 1981
SUBJECT: PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PETITION
ENGLISH STREET . -- � � ;t r.�- %•_,, : _ -
i ,.
Attached is a petition for public improvements to serve
English Street from Kohlman Avenue to approximately 630
feet north. The petition is signed by 1000 of the abutting
property owners. The property owners on both sides of the
street apparently intend to sell lots if the improvements
are made.
This raises a quest ` ion about the financing of the proposed
project. The curret requirements area combination of
- the City platting code, City assessment policy and precedents
that have been established through various Council actions
covering improvement projects. Property developers are re
quired to pay the entire cost of all internal plat improvements
(improvements which directly serve the plat, i.e., local street
and utilities). The developer has the option of providing his
own engineer and contractor to construct the project under City
supervision or have the City construct the improvements under
normal municipal purchase and contract requirements. In either
case, the developer is required to provide a certified check
or irrevocable letter of credit to the City to guarantee payment
of project costs.
In the case of external improvements needed by a proposed plat
(collector street and trunk utilities which benefit other
properties), the Council, when it deemed it advisable, has
made the improvement under Chapter 429 of the Minnesota Statutes.
In recent projects, however, the Council has required the primary
developer to pay for his proportionate share of the cost under
the terms of a developer's agreement rather than standard assessments.
Attached is a request from the petition sponsor requesting. the
City to assess the project under the provisions. of Chapter .429
of the Minnesota Statutes. Financing the project through assessments
could be interpreted as a departure from City polio. However,
in this situation the Council may wish to allow assessment financing
since the term "developer" is somewhat ill - defined.
If the Council wishes to proceed further with this petition, a
feasibility study should be authorized with some direction as to
the method of financing to be considered.
r Y
We , the unders i gned , do hereby peti ti on the Counci 1 of the Ci ty of MapI ewood to:
l M PR.eU� EuVGt_lS IZOK �o►}tr��Aj
W i jk 5 w ,v I - r A A.,Y s L `'M
W A P vr!:> A Q t> !S
and that the said be undertaken by the Village Council in accordance with
the provi scans of Mi pnesota Statutes , Chapter 429; and that the cost thereof be assessed
.against berxe f i tted property as provided by said Chapter 429,
OWNER- STREET ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION - FRONT- DATE
r ;
I certify that I have witnessed the above signatures, and the ro osed i rovements were
P p �
discussed with the si ners.
( DATE) PETITI@iv SPONSOR
J
IZ
��
ee A �
�1Q�.s �- �� V746
L9
f
J c'
je ELA I V -0 A-)
Lai
s
r ;
I certify that I have witnessed the above signatures, and the ro osed i rovements were
P p �
discussed with the si ners.
( DATE) PETITI@iv SPONSOR
J
t
April 2, 1981
CCU`1CIL HT2. 3ERS : - --
In Yegards to our Petition for Public Improvements, which concerns the
extension of English Street, We ask for the following exemption. Currently,
it is City policy to require. a developer to give the City a Letter of Credit
for 150% of the cost of the Public Improvement. We understand how this
insures the City that these improvements are to be paid for. We would like
to have this requirement waved in this case'- based on the following..
The two property comers involved (John Tucci; Lot 12, Kohlmans Addition and
John Sinocaatny; Lots 73 & 74, Gardena Addition) are both retired and on Fixed
Incomes. City '_'olicy . dictates they furnish a letter of cre�i t for $195,000.
This is based on an estimated cost of $130,000 for the project. ;die ther owner
has access to those kinds of funds. With this in mind, we have but � -ro choices:
(1) rave this requirement waved and assess the developed property, or (2 ) Have
the project come to a complete halt.
Nie ther of the prof erty ayners is out to become a developer. They happen -
to have '_and that could be sold for THousing Construction. This is evident
by the prices being asked for the properties, currently, $5,000 each. . Based
on this, the net cost per lot will be undar $15,000, which in the current
Real Estate market, will make them very saleable. •
Due to the above stated facts, we feel that our package is very seleable
and therefor, that the City is in a no risk situation. The sale of the lots
will core quickly upon the decision to proceed with the street construction and
the funds wi I1 be available to pay t'Ze assessments. Thank You for your time
and consideration in this ma tter *
1 Q �
c. •
R
PETITIONED IMPROVEMENT
ENGLISH STREET
Scale
i 200'
Date:
3/28/81
IN 1k
A
•
•
�
�
1
► ■ j j
If
♦
..•.
- - '•
i i
.. .
.i
r
f i
~ ♦ •►
t � f _ I
_
�
( • �
ISIS � � •
of
• �► _ 4 �. _. i.i1. T:
K C� L �r4 `V
r
0 H L M A N
..
60?
1 �
•
Af
PETITIONED IMPROVEMENT
ENGLISH STREET
Scale
i 200'
Date:
3/28/81
t�l
MEMORANDUM
f
TO: Mayor and City Council 2
FROM: Barry Evans, City Manage '21"t,
SUBJECT: Labor Agreement with Local #320
DATE: April 13, 1981
An agreement for 1981 and 1982 has been reached. The salient points are:
1. A 10/ wage increase for 1981 and 9% for 1982.
2. Medical insurance payments to increase $10 to $95 per
month for 1981 and another $10 for 1982 with an option
to use the $10 in 1982 on the dental plan. For those
who do not have family protection, $10 above the cost
of single coverage may be used toward dental coverage for
v - 1981.
3. Wage differential for paramedics to increase from $85
to $105 for 1981 and 1982.
I recommend acceptance of the above as well as the necessary transfer from
the contingency fund for this and other employee wage and fringe benefits
which have been approved.
j 0, ' t
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Permit Renewal for a home occupation
LOCATION: 1997 White Bear Avenue
APPLI €ANT: Theresa Barnhill =-
OWNER-- H. M. Barnhill
PROJECT: Novel Exchange Store
DATE: April 1, 1981
SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL
Re ue t
Approval to continue operation of a book exchange business out of the applicant's
garage.
Approval is requested for a five year period.
Proposed Land Use
1. The applicant's paperback book exchange business is basically a hobby.
i
Neighbors walk n to exchange books. The business is restricted to one-half
of the applicant's double garage. The amount of money that is exchanged is the
difference between the customer's book and the book they want.
2. There are four off - street parking spaces in the applicant's yard.
BACKGROUND
Site Description
1. Lot area: 18,000 square feet
2. Existing land use: Single family dwelling and book exchange business
Surroundinq Land Uses
Northerly: Undeveloped land
Southerly: Single family home
Easterly: White Bear Avenue and Ramsey County property
Westerly: County Ditch #17
Past Action
4- 7 -80:- Council approved a special exception for a home occupation=for the book
exchange business with the following conditions:
1 . One wall mounted five pount all purpose fire extinguisher shall be installed
20 "No smoking" signs shall be posted
3. Maintain the present signing only
4. Council shall review this home occupation after one year to see if there
have been any problems created by this business.
3- 19 -81: Council approved the renewal of a home occupation permit for Jeanne
Robert's reupholster service at 1918 Kennard Street for a three (3) year perj od .
Council felt that five (5) years was too long of a period for a home occupation
to operate without an updated review of the business
DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS
'ST
7^ �
�r
Planning
1. Land Use Plan Designation: RL , Low Density Residential.
2. Zoning: R-1, Residence District (Single Dwelling).
3. Refer to the Planning Commission Subcommittee report on home occupations.
4. The Applicant is complying with the above Council conditions and the Planning
Commission's criteria.
CONCLUSION
Analysis
Staff sees no reason to deny the permit renewal. There have not been any problems
generated by this home occupation.
Recommendation
Approval to renew the special exception for a three -year period, subject to compliance
with the original conditions and criteria listed i n the Planning Commission Sub-
committee report on home occupations.
Enclosed:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line Map
3. Planning Commission Subcommittee Report
4. Applicant's letter dated 3 -18 -81
- 2 -
\K 0 �HL %M1 �AN A V E .
R OAD
D
Z
Z
wj
u
Q
AV E.
d:
su R jA• w J.
W
Wokefield
Cr or
SOP Loh e
o z
P 41 E All
CD y
F11; FIr1r] -
(64)
68
H 0 L L
15 >
ir
z t, ~'
� )5>
VR Ij P EY AVE.
Y AVE L —j
N AVE
.j 1PRICE X AV cc 49
14
AN X it
0
X
L
L A R P f
[Inn V%
•
'' PETITIONER Barnhi
REQUEST Special Exception
O
0
39
-i
4K
AVE
REAM
OA =A;�' AVE
R A C) AT Z VF
::� tc
IL 68 (2. 1 CH.
3.) C
9C
W NuH rH ST.
>
1--:
W
Cr
z
Z
LLJ
NC
L I
U)
z cr_
DEMONT u. A V E.wj
ROOK AVE.23E ea
c �__ Gr
cr
t C7
L NT A
XTAA�L V
S E
�] �� EJR V4
kIS
G [ RAND JEW]EAV I
D R.
I K �IN
K O+q L M A N AVE.
640 N •
EDGE HILL RD.
W
D
0
3k:
AV Ifth AVE.
AVE.
2400 N.
C &STLE AA"
SHERREN AVE
��� AV E.-
- 71f
rOPE AVE.
w - , - - 1 -::�
L CO AVE,
A V_E,
L A RK AVE.
z
[A U R IE J R D . D 0
j cr ILAURIE] RD.
>- -j Cr
w w
25 SAN T z A ��EZ] -=�
Q �� z
>
A VE. su �! AYE
U RKE 9X "I
CQ
0 ELDRIDG j AVE
4 - � a cwi 00
�C W
PUBLIC WORKS
,ELMO]
N N FT w
> T Cr AVE. 64 > BLDG.
tr
r VE S KILL rA M a) AVE.
I HA Pt Pt 1 5 0
ar L A�
_q ROS d 1woof A vEr4i
Location Map
T T i
77 a
=mi
d
/ f
'0 ,
-,/
t
ol
oe
4 06 I \
.A,
f I
PETITIONER Barnhill
C .' REQUESt p ecial Exception
}
.2. Property Line Map
C ` ►.- 1 1. V `�... 1 • �
1
V'
F
The Planning Commission ssion concurs with the need for - an appropriate definition of a home
occupation. It
is also felt that while certain occupations require the issuance of a
special use permit, t , other activities such as those that do not have any of the following
should be allowed without a permit:
1 . Employment of any person not residing in the dwelling unit
2. Customers visiting the premises
3. Mand4�acture of products on the premises..
The
Pl armi n 9 Comini ssi on proposes the following guidelines for a Home Occupation:
Home Occupation on re ui ri ng a permit is defined as that occupation conducted in a
p q
dwelli 9 unit involving vi n the manufacture and /or sale of a product or service, subject
to the following limitations:
1.
Is conducted on a continuing basis, that is, for more than 30 days out of the
year.
2. Not more than one person other than members of the family residing on the
premises shall be allowed to engage in such occupation.
3. The p
Thy use of the remises for the home occupation shall be clearly i nci der: -al and
subordinate to its use for residential purposes by its occupants, and no .� ,Dre
o 20% of the dwelling unit floor area shall be used in
than an aroma equivalent t / 9
the conduct of the home occupation.
4
There shall be no change in the outside appearance of the building or premises,
or other visible evidence of the conduct of such home occupation other than
one sign, not exceeding two square feet in area, non - illuminated, and mounted
flat against the wall of the principal building.
5. There shal be no retail sales of products produced off site in connection
with such home occupation.
6. No traffic shall be g enerated b such home occupation in greater volumes than
g y
would normal be expected in a residential neighborhood, and the need for off-
street P arki ng shall not exceed more than three off- street parking spaces for
the home occupation at any given time in addition to the parking spaces required
b y the resident occupants; in no event shall such number of off - street parking
soaces exceed a total of five such spaces for the premises and shall be off
of the street other than in a required front yard.
7. No equipment or process shall be used in such home occupation which creates
noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odors, or electrical interference detectable
_ to the normal senses off the lot, if the occupation is conducted in a single
- family residence, or outside the dwelling unit if conducted in other than a
single fami residence. In the case of electrical interference, no equip-
= g
ment or p rocess shall be used which creates visual or audible interference in
an y . radio or television receivers off the premises, or causes _fluctuations in
' line. voltage off the premises.
8. No fire safet y� or health hazard shall exist for the residents of the dwe'l 1 i ng
unit, customers, or employee.
./" ✓ire ���--�ri',.� t?- �__ --�" � �- _._! G �
-- -�✓`'' �i�— � -_,�,f p• Cyr' - �..� 7 % - '
or �� -�'�' ---cam LL��,i�� � • � �' _ •
/oo
ci
001<
ere,
:.' "- -��''� U .�/ .. .''" �-�� / ,� [�
too
"Of
C� - ''���..����- �.. /�i L�-� -� �' �,�. -- �7'
J -3
MEMORANDUM
T0: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development �.
SUBJECT: Plan Update
vim
DATE: March 30, 1981
The Plan Update must be approved by the Planning. Commission and considered
but not approved, by the City Council, before submission to the Metropolitan
Counci 1. The Plan Update to must b Council
p e submitted tted to the ���e tropo 1 � tan by
April 20, 1981. The Metropolitan Council then has 120 days to review the Plan.
Following their review, the Plan must be adopted by the City Council.
Recommendation
I. Approval by the Planning Commission of the Plan Update and enclosed
resolution.
II. Acceptance, -but not approval, by the City Council of the Plan Update and
approval of the enclosed resolution,
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Land P -1 anni ng Act requires 1 ocal ov '
re are comprehensive g ernmental units
to
P P p e plans and submit them to the Council for
review; and — -
IdHEREAS, these plans entitled City of Maplewood Com rehensi ve
Cam rehens i ve Sewer Plan p . and
P represent the response to the City of 'Map lewood
to the requirements of the Pietro of i tan Land p
- p Planning ng Act; and
WHEREAS, four neighborhood public hearings were held with '
notice; and
h required legal
WHEREAS, these plans were sent to all adjacent or affected '
Puri sdi ct�ons
for review and comment on October 21, 1980.
Be it hereby resolved by the Maplewood Planning ommission
of the Maplewood, ewood- Coin re g that the update
p Comprehensive Plan, including the Comprehensive Se
be adopted with all approved p Sewer Plan
v p p amendments.
Adopted by the Maplewood Planning Cor►mi ss i on this 6th day ,Y of April , l 9�l .
Lester Axdahl , Chai rman
Attested by:
Geoff/ Secretary
i
r
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING PRE - REVIEW REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN SATISFIED
y WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Land Planning Act requires res local governmental q g ernmental units
to prepare comprehensive plans and submit them to the Metropolitan Council for
review; and
WHEREAS, these pl ans enti tl ed Ci ty of. Mapl ewood Comprehensi ve an and Co
mpre -
Lens i ve Sewer Plan represent the response to the City of Ma 1 e od to the -
p require-
i re
tents of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act; and
flEREAS these plans were adopted by the Ci t nn� ng of Maplewood Planning ' ss on
y p Com�rii
on April 6 , 1981 following public hearings with required l e g a l notice • and
WHEREAS, these plans were sent to the following 9 for review and
comment on October 21, 1980:
Li ttle Canada, St. Paul , Rosevi 11 e, Vadnai s Heights, Whi to Bear Lake
North St. Paul, Newport, Oakdale, Woodbury, Valley Branch Watershed
Board, Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed Board, ' P,osevi 1 le School
District No. 623, North St. Paul - Maplewood - Oakdale School District
622, White Bear Lake School District 624 Washington Count and
y
Ramsey County; and y '
WHEREAS, these plans were considered and accepted, but not adopted, b t he
City COUnci1 on April 16, 1981; and
p y
WHEREAS these plans shall be transmitted to the above jurisdictions concurrently
with submission to the Metropolitan Council for formal review under
the
Metropolitan Land Planning Act.
Be it hereby resolved by the City Council of Maplewood ewood that the Director P � ector of
Community Development is authori zed and directed to submit these 1 an
of i p s to the
Chairman of the Metro
p tan Council for review under Section 473.175 of the
Metropol i tan Land Planning Act.
Adopted by the City Council this 16th day of April, 1981.
John Greavu, Mayor
Attest:
Lgci l l e Aurelius, City Clerk
i
' T
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
s
SUBJECT: P l a n Update
Stu
-SATE : March 30, 1981
J -3
The Plan Update must be approved by the Planning Commission and considered
but not approved, by the City before submission to the Metropolitan
Counci 1. The Plan Update to mu b r
p must e submitted to the �Ietropol i tan Counci by
April 20, 1981. The Metropolitan Council then has 120 days to review the Pla
y n.
Fol lowing their review, the Plan must be adopted by the City Council.
Recommendat i on
I . Approval by the Planning Commission of the Plan Update and enclosed
resolution.
II. Acceptance, but not approval, by the Ci Counci of the Plan Update and
approval of the enclosed resolution.
i
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Land Planning Act requires local overnm '
re are comprehensive 9 ental units
to
p P p i ve plans and submit t them to the Council for
review; and
Iwo a -
'�tNEREAS, these plans enti tled Ci ty of Maplewood ewood Comprehensi v
p e Fla and
Cumprehensi ve Sewer Plan represent the response to the City of
y l�apl ewood
to the requirements of the Pletropol i tan Land Planning Act; and
WHEREAS, four neighborhood public heari ngs were held with required
notice; and r legal
WHEREAS, these plans were sent to all adjacent or affected jurisdictions
for review and comment on October 21, 1980.
Be it hereby resolved by the Maplewood Planning Commission ion t
of the Maplewood ewood Com that the update
p Comprehensive ve P 1 an, including the comprehensive i ve Sewe
p r P1 an
be adopted with all approved amendments.
Adopted by the Maplewood Planning Commission this 6th day
y of April, 1 , 1981.
Lester Axdahl , Chairman
Attested by:
Geoff/Olson, Secretary
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING PRE - REVIEW REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN SATISFIED
g WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Land Planning Act requires local '
governmental 1 units
to prepare comprehensive plans and submit them to the Metropolitan Council f or
review; and
WHEREAS, these plans entitled City of. Maplewood Comprehensive N an and
Compre-
hensive Sewer Plan represent the response to the Ci t of Ma ' 1 od require-
y p e to the requ� re
-ments of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act; and
91EREAS these plans were adopted by the City of Maplewood Planning g Commission
on April 6, 1981 following publi hearings with required legal notice •
and
WHEREAS, these plans were sent to the following ' g for review and
comment on October 21, 1980:
Little Canada, St. Paul, Roseville, Vadnai s Heights, White Bear Lake
North St. Paul, Newport, Oakdale, Woodbury, Valley Branch Watershed '
Board, Rams ey-Wa ngton Metro Watershed Board, Roseville School
District No. 623, North St. Paul - Maplewood - Oakdale School District
622, White Bear Lake School District 624, Washington Count and
y y�
Ramsey Count • and y '
WHEREAS, these plans were considered and accepted, but not adopted,
City Council on April P by the
y p 1 16, 1981; and
WHEREAS these plans shall be transmitted to the above j urisdiction
� s concurrently
with submission to the Metropolitan Council for formal review under the
Metropolitan Land Planning Act.
Be it hereby resolved by the City Council of Maplewood ewood that the e Director of
Community Development is authorized and directed to submit these plans to the
Chairman. of the Metropolitan Council for review under Section
473.175 of the
Metropolitan Land Planning Act.
Adopted by the City Counci th s 16th day of April, 1981,
jonn Greavu, Mayor
Attest:
Lucille Aurelius, City Clerk
i
i � . V
M E M O R A N D U M
T0: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development _
SUBJECT: HRA Annual Report'
The HRA 's Annual Report
for 1980 -1981 is enclosed. During the past Uar, the HRA
has been ui to active. In addition to summarizing the year's activities, the
q ounci 1 consi derati on, aimed at reducing
report. also includes recor��mendati ons for C
the cost of residential development.
These recommendations are:
l . That the Council consider establishing an ad -hoc committee to review
Ma P l ewood' s present subdivision requirements. The purpose of the committee
would be to make recornmendati ons aimed at reducing developer costs without
compromising public health and safety.
2. That the Council should consider reducing minimum floor area requirements
for new housing. The present floor area requirements are felt to be overly
restrictive.
Minutes from the March 19, 1981 Joint Council/HRA meeting are also enclosed.
Staff Comments on the HRA recommendations:
The existing subdivision Ordinance is in the process of being rewritten, because
it is so outdated that it no longer reflects current Council policies an
procedures. Staff will be submitting a copy of the proposed ordinance to the
HRA and Planning Commission for their study and recommendation later this year.
ordinance amending the minimum floor area requirement was submitted
2. A proposed
to the Planning Commission on April 6 and will be considered by the City Council
on May 7 1.
Recommendati on
Accept the HRA's 1980 -1981 Annual Report.
Enc . -
}
CITY OF
l�P
1902 EAST COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109
:..
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT = 770 -4560
February 13, 1981
Maplewood City Council
1380 Frost Avenue
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Dear Council Members:
Presented herewith is our annual report for the period from March, 1980
to March of 1981. A copy of our record of attendance for this period is at-
tached as Exhibit A. As you w i l l note, we have had some turnover on the HRA
during this period. Bill Nemi tz, a charter member who had to resign due to
increased demands of his business, has been replaced by Thomas Morris. The
Human Relations Commission liaison, Maria Larsen, has been replaced by
Lucille Bryant.
During the past year we have participated in three programs administered
by the Metropolitan Council Housing and Redevelopment Authority. A brief
summary of these programs is as follows:
1. SECTION 8 RENTAL ASSISTANCE (EXISTING HOUSING) . By resolution dated
February 1979, the City of Maplewood became the 33rd community to join
this program which now includes over 50 participating communities.
This program, which utili existing housing stock, allows qualified
individuals to rent housing in the moderate rent range at a l ocation
of their choice. The individual pays a maximum of 25% of income as
rent, and the difference between that sum and the actual rent i paid
directly to the landlord by HUD. The units remain in the private
sector and on the tax roles. Staffing is provided by the Metropolitan
Council, with office space in the city hall, furniture and telephone
provided by Maplewood. This year Maplewood had 134 applicants certified
and participating in the program, and 15 on the waiting l i s t (Exhibit B) .
As compared to last year, when we had Ill participating and 55 on the-
- waiting list.
20 MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY HOUSING GRANTS, Again 1980 the
C City of Maplewood entered into an. agreement with the Mef opol i tan Council
to disburse $26,670-in..MHFA grants to improve resident property for
eligible families and individua ( with an adjusted gross income
. less than $6,000). In an effort to assist as many qualified needs as
possible,. notices of the program (See Exhibit C) were inserted in the
quarterly sewer billings for three months. This produced 17 applications
which were reviewed according to our revised guidelines (see Exhibit D),
Maplewood City Council
- 2 -
February 13, 1981
Four were ineligible, three withdrew, and 14 households will be funded,
for a total of approximately $355200. This is our original grant
am p Pp
amount plus approximately $10,000 of bonus money which was not used in
the communities to which it was. originally allocated. 4-his is .about
-4
the same amount of bonus money we received last year) .n addition, 10
- grant recipients i ents also received RAP assistance for weatheti zati on
(insulation), in conjunction with our grant. RAP grants are l i m i t e d - t o
$420 per unit in labor and materials for weathers zati on -improvements. A
co py of this year's and last year's applicant schedules are attached
as Exhibit E.
3. MODERATE REHABILITATION SECTION 8 ) . By resolution dated December 1979,
Maplewood became a participating community in the new Metro HRA Section 8
Moderate Rehabilitation Program which emphasizes small, multi-unit build-
i n 9 s of two to twelve units. In 1980 the program provided below market
interest rate loans for moderate rehabilitation for about 50 units of
rental housing for low and moderate income tenants in the participating
communities. There were three proposals from Maplewood of which one
has been funded to date - the first one in the program - which as been
written up in Metro Monitor and local papers. (See Exhibit F) .
During the past hear the HRA has also been involved with the following
programs:
1. CDBG & BONUS FUNDS
Two
grants and
two allotments of bonus funds from
years 1977 through
1980
totalling
$455,792, were used to fund improve-
ments necessary to
make
the Maple
Knoll PUD (57 townhouses) possible.
2. SUBSIDIZED HOUSING PROPOSALS REVIEWED. The only proposal received
through the A -95 process this year was for the Parksi de Townhouses; 70
units of which 30 were family and 40 elderly. We sent a letter to
MHFA outlining the need for the low and moderate income housing.
The
project was partially funded (the 30 family units) but it appears i t
.
will not be constructed because of additional costs due to drainage
problems.
3. ALLOCATION GOALS The 1980 -83 goals, as established by the Metropolitan
Council, are designated family, large family and elderly, as well as
new units and existing. To further complicate the issue, the community
is not given an allocation of a number of units, but a fair share per -
centage which is translated into a dollar value which must then be
converted to a unit number (see Exhibit G) . Given the budgetary cut-
- backs at both Federal and State levels, i t is feared meeting these
goals will be even more difficult than understanding them. At our re-
q uest, local developers Robert Ti l sen and Marlin Grant met with the
_ HRA and gave us an interesting insight into the house ng 'industry, its
state at the resent time and what the near future may bring, as well
p as thoughts on what the City might do to make the possibility of
affordable housing more of a likelihood.
I
Maplewood City Council
- 3 -
February 13, 1981
4. PROJECTS UND ER CONSTRUCTION MAPLE KNOLL PUD) . Construction on the 57
town ouse uni ts as fin i a un . e T HRA i s j i n f eel i ng tha t
y g osals
this
is indeed an accomplishment, as we have been looks n'at prop
on this site since we were established six years ago.
5. CONCORDIA
ARMS
S. Construction is now well underway on thf� project
---
which has 124 units of elderly housing. The building which is owned
by Zion
Lutheran Church, will be managed by Wilder, and should be
ready for occupancy by mid -1982.
6. FUNDED BY NOT UNDER CONSTRUCTION. The Ataxia Foundation has received
money for 10 units of subsidized housing for the handicapped. To date
they are still in the process of choosing a site, with staff providing
such assistance as it can to help in the selection process. They are
on a 1i g
limited budget and it is questionable whether they will be able
to purchase a site within the amount without addi tional assistance
(CDBG, etc .) .
Referred by City Council:
HOUSING MAINTENANCE CODE. The HRA has assisted in the prepar-
ation n and review of the Rental House ng Code, which was passed in June
d the Owner occupied Housing Maintenance Code which was passed
in January 1981.
2. HOUSING
SECTION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. The HRA reviewed the updated
Comprehensive Plan housing section, established three and ten year
• draftin a Housi subs zed house ng goals and began g g Assi stance Plan
(Exhi bi t H) . The HAP wi 11 not
for October 1980 through 1983.
(HAP)
be submitted to the Department of Housing and Urban Development unless
Maplewood pursues CDBG monies in 1981.
1981 -82 -82 PROGRAM. The changing housing scen both the mortgage market
and the go p ro
governmental rams , seem to point toward an even bleaker situation
9
than has e ` existed in the past year. It appears that the housing money, which
has been scarce,
will become even more so unless there is a turn about in the
present scene. This is at the time when we are seeing the lowest vacancy rate
ever in rental units, and just as the "baby boom" is coming i nto the housing
market. Further, increasing costs in housing maintenance and utility costs are
making thi ngs increasingly difficult for those on fixed incomes, and Maplewood
is seeing
la r g er numbers of its population reaching retirement age. While
we cannot predict what will be available in the form of housing programs
- dri ng the coming year, we would hope to be able to:
1. Continue arti ci ati on in the Metro HRA Section 8 Rental Assi tance
P P
Program, the MHFA ' Home Improvement Grant Program, and the Moderate
Rehabilitation Program for rental housing
Maplewood City Council _ 4 _ February 13, 1981
oni tori n proposals s for funding which have appeared before
2. Continue m onitoring P P
us to see whether or not funding and construction occurs, as well
as
reviewing
incomi p ro osals in accordance with need and compati b 1 ty
p .�
with the Comprehen Plan, and making appropriate rece� menda ti ons i
on same to the proper agencies :--
with the City Council i n February to review our year
s
3. Hold joint meeting y .
performance and to outline a work program for the coming year
t we will attempt to keep current on what is happening in
As in the pas
i n and to actively pursue ways of faci 1 i tati ng affordable
the field of hous g and guidelines
housing in our City in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan
presented by the City Council.
If at a n y time it is fel t �additional input or guidance from the Council
is desirable proper
either y request for the ro functioning of the HRA, this will be communicated
to you, � b memo, a for a shirt sleeve session, or unde r
"Visitor Presentation" on your agenda if time is short.
i
EXHIBIT A
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MEMB
TERM EI RES
torrai ne Fischer
March, X986
4812 North Furness
44apl ewood, Minnesota
55109
Guy Glover
March,
1982
809 E: Belmont Lane
Maplewood, MI nnesota
55117
Frances Juker
March,
1983
1965 Barclay
Maplewood, Minnesota
55109
Wilbur Nemi tz
Tom Morris *
March,
1982
1069 S. Crestview Drive
2324 Gall Avenue
fla p 1 ewood Minnesota
55119
Maplewood, Minnesota
55109
Maria Larsen
Lucille Bryant *
March,
1985
2001 Duluth Street
1556 Gervai s Avenue
Maplewood, Minnesota
55109
Maplewood, Minnesota
55109
*In February 1981, Tom
Morris
and
Lucille Bryant were
appointed
to fill
the
positions created by
the resignation
of Wilbur Nemi tz
and Maria
Larsen
ATTENDANCE
0
co O
o
00
O
00
o O
00 O 00
co 1
O
co
1
O
co
1
o
c
I
00
o --
co co
1 1
r--
00
1
1 c0
-- 1
r-- c0
i
�'
N
1
M
r
1
O I N
r-- co r---
t.p
r---
r
1
r
1
dl M
1 r ._..
O
r---
1 I
1
1
LO
1 1 1
t t\ 00
1
O
Fischer X X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X X
X
Glover X X
0
0
0 0
0
0
X
0 X
X
0
LU
J uker X X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X X
X
L1J
U
Larsen 0 X
0
0
0 X
X
0
0
X X
R
-
U
ftemi tz X X
X
X
X 0
0
X
0
X X
R
Bryant
-
X
Morri s
y
X
X -- Present
0 - Absent
.R - Resigned
EXHIBIT B
EXISTING SECTION 8
Maplewood Rental Units
as of January, 1981
Ci-hn tury East
1 Century Ave. N.
Chris tensen' s Properties
2112 & 2104 Mississippi
Eastwood Investment s
2585 Conway
Edgerton Highland
482 E. Skillman
Brookview Manor
131 N. Century
Pat Monno
2024 Clarence
Hazelwood - Gear Apts .
1510 E. County Rd. B
Louis Gilbert
1860 McMenemy
Greengate Apts .
1829 Furness
English Manor,
1809 English
Wayne Lindahl
1880 English
Maple Manor
x.760 Adolphus
- - -- Maplewood Manor
2271 N. Atlantic
18
.
TOTAL
17 - 2 dr
1
- 1 bdr
2
TOTAL
- 2 bdr
2
TOTAL
2
- 2 bdr.
9
T OTAL
7 - 2 bdr
2
- 1 bdr
9
T OTAL
9 - 2 bdr
3
TOTAL
1
- 2 bdr
2
- 1 bdr
13
TOTAL
12
- 2 bdr
1
- 1 bdr
1
TOTAL
1
- 1 bdr
3
TOTAL
- 2 bdr
11
TOTAL
9
- 2 bdr
2
- 1 bdr
1
TOTAL
1
- 2 bdr
29
TOTAL
29 - 2 bdr
7
TOTAL
7
- 1 b car
i
Maplewood Townhouses
384 S. McKnight
Bernard McVey
210.9
Bradley
Carl
L. Midj aas
2:072
Mississippi
9l e x
Mi.n i ch
1915
Arcade
Rae Anne Ospina
2096 Mississippi
Jerome Parker
1491 Ripley
Alvin Peterson
2132 Atlantic
R.S.L. Investment
317 E. Larpenteur
Laurence Reed
1069 Bellecrest Dr.
Daniel Vietzke
2056 Mississippi
David Willard
1272 E. County Rd. B
George Ann Wilson
1.898 Manton
John Kelly
1530 N. McKnight
-2-
TOTAL
13
TOTAL
13
- 3 bdr
1
TOTAL
-- 1
- 1 bdr
2
TOTAL
2
- 2 b dam.
1
- 2 bdr
1
TOTAL
I
- 1 bdr
1
TOTAL
1
- 2 bdr
1
TOTAL
1 - 5 bdr
1
TOTA
1 - b dr
1
TOTAL
1
- 2 bdr
1
TO TAL
1 - 2 bdr
1
TOTAL
1
- 2 bdr
1 TOTAL
- 2 bdr
1 TOTAL
1 - 3 bdr
1 TO TAL
1 - 4dr
134
EXHIBIT C
HOME IMPROVEMENT GRANTS AVAILABLE
The Ktplewood Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) is presently accepti nQ
appl i cations for the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency's Home Improvement Grant
Program.
Households with an annual adjusted gross income of $6,000 or less are el igible
for assistance.
The purpose of this grant program is to assist eligible applicants in repairing
their homes to correct deficiencies directly affecting safety, habitability, energy
usage and handicap accessibilit y The maximum grant amount available is $6,000
per applicant.
Homeowners and con tractors wishing to participate in this program should contact
Randall Johnson (770-4560) at the Maplewood Office of Community Devel opl -Dent.
EXHIBIT D.
GRANT COMMITTEE GUIDELINES FOR MAPLEWOOD
Purpose
The purpose of these Guidelines i to set forth the process and
cri teri a for revi ewi ng appl i cations fo.r MHFA Home Improvement
Grant Program Funds.
i
The Grant Committee wi be responsible for. determining =
el i gi 1 i ty and deci di ng wh i ch appl i cants recei ve grant funds
accoyz:ii ng to the General Grant Program Guidelines and according
to tf ese Guidelines,
The Grant Committee should also be prepared to act as a grievance
panel to answer the questions and hear the complaints of residents
refused grant funds.
Committee Membership
The membership of the Grant Committee consists of Maplewood HRA
members.
Committ Meetings
The meetings of the Committee shall be held the same as those of
the HRA (presently the second Tuesday of the month at 7:30 p.m.)
in order to establish priority guidelines for the review of 9 rant
applications. The Grant Committee may also. meet as necessary in
special meetings in order to review applications until all grant
funds are committed. Upon review of each application, the C-om- -
mi ttee w i l l determine th priority ranking of the application and
approve grants within the funding limitation.
Application Review Criteria
Each application for grant funds shal be determined to be eli
on the basis of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Grant Program
e l i g i b i l i t y guidelines and shal further be assigned a numerical
ran.ki ng based on the priority criteria listed below.
A. E1 i gi bi 1 i ty Gui del i nes
Applicants must meet the General Grant Program Guidelines
for e l i g i b i l i t y as to Ownership, Income, Zoning, and El
=� Improvements of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Home
Improvement Grant Program. Priority to be gi Xon to
elderly applicants and energy related improvements.
3. PRIORITY GUIDELINES (revised 9- 16 -80)
Applications will be reviewed in order of date and
time received.
Eligible applicants as defined by Statute, meeting
one or more of
the following Gui del i nes , w i l l be awarded points.
Those appl i cants
with the highest point totals will be given first.
considerations
for grant monies, provided that priority is to be
given to elderly
applicants, i cants � energy and en related improvements, not wi
P 9 y
thsta -di ng point
_
tota 1 s
pts .
pts.
fir• _,
4) Ai. ...............................
. r Infiltration ...............
i
1. INCOME ( of Maximum Allowable
0 - 20 o $($ 0 - $1200)
is
p ts
- ......... ...............................
2400
21 - 40l ( 1201 }
- 3 6 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . ._ . . . . . . . .
41 - 60q ( 2401 ) . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . 6. pts.
4800 ......... ...............................
61 - 80� ( 3601 - )
4 pts.
2 D t s.
_ - 6000 ......................
81 100/ ( 4801 ) ......... . ........
,
pts
2. AGE
• ........ ............................... 5 pts.
Applicant 62 years of age or over
3. DISABILITY
Household Permanent Disability 5 pts.
Head of household 100/ Per Y ............................ .
4. LOCATION
• (within locks of a Federally or State subsidized housing
Adjacent cent to 6 blocks) .
' least 50 housing ..... 5 p is
development containing ng at 9 un� is ..................
5. GRANT IMPACT
a. Energy Saving Improvements
5
pts.
.
1) ventilation ...................... ....................•..........
4
pt each major
2) Insulation ........... ...............................
type
storm windows n d ows ... ...............................
3) Storm doors and sto
3
2
pts .
pts.
4) Ai. ...............................
. r Infiltration ...............
. .. • • • • • •
b. Elimination of health or life- safety hazard(s) ............
5
10
ptS, per hazard
pts
' 'lit (disabled
c. InzDrovement of access b� y ersons) ...•.•.•..•0999...:. persons)
,
pts
d. Applicant will provide labor ....... ............................... .
6.
A minimum of 17 points i nts are to be considered for funding
�
Sr
.All
applicants must meet the following conditions to be fundable: •
1.
• must be listed sted i n the Property Inspection Report
All necessary improvements � be reasonably livable,
will y
2.
on comp lotion of necessary repairs,
The structure, up P
safe, habitable, and ener effi al 1 v iab le ,
the completion of necessary repairs , will be economic _ � _ __
3.
.
The structure, upon
Home Improvement Grant may be amortized
such that the amount of the p
APPENDIX E
W ► a '. ? ,,.,I ,.. .
HOME IMPROVEMENT GRANTS*
r - I I ►lf l4.1 ,.
YEAR IV FUNDING
JULY 19 - JUNE 1980 A:° �� ' o� A! /kkll� � '�° A �- ��' � O o � ° Q ~ �
7 0 � vti ` �ti �. J� °A, A!o ��Q Q°� o 0 C.) c ,� °�c� �� ��, `' � 4� �, �Q _ �'d� on o ?�, .ti� .o ,� � `� Q � OTHER COMMENTS
DATE OF REPORT a A c,
FEBRUARY 1 913 1 0W T/ 44-- moo A� Q "
(�7
REVISED REPORT
79 -1
7 -3
OK
8 -7
8 -14
A
49675
4,570
X
X
X
X
79 - 2
7 - 2
OK
8 - 7
8 -14
A,
1,765
2
X
X
X
X
79 -3
7 -3
OK
8 -8
8 -14
A
2
2,424
X
X
X
X
79 -4
7 -13
OK
8 -7
8 -14
A
2,280
1,584
X
X
X
X
'
.79 -5 (BONUS)
7 -19,
OK
8 -8
8 -14
R
49753
X
X
X
X
RAP '
Declared eligible - income calculations in error
79 - 6
7 -14
OK
8 -7
8 -14
A
3,550
1
X
X
X
X
79 -7
7 -24
NO
8 -8
8 -14
R
---
79-8
7 -25
OK
8 -8
8 -14
A
2065
1
X
X
X
X
79 -9 (Bonus)
8 -10
OK
9 -6
9 -11
A
1
1
X
X
X
Contractor to install two smoke detectors
79 - 10
8 - 13
OK
9 - 6
9 - 11
A
2
4
X
X
X
X
79 -
8 - 15
OK
9 - 11
9 - 11
A
29125
1
X
X
X
X
.,,: ;....,,
79 -f2 (bonus)
8 -15
OK
9 -10
see
commi
2,279
X
X
X
X
rejected on 9- 11 -79, reconsidered #pOl** d
on 4 -24 -80
TOTAL GRANT AMOUNT
*The Minnesota Data Privacy Act prohibits identification of Grant applicants
f
APPENDIX E
NOME IMPROVEMENT GRANTS*
r i -I 1110+ 4.
YEAR IV FUNDING
JULY 1979 - JUNE 1980 �``' v � do °
p lc VQ V �, C Q ' ,��C' J 4' O ti 't�v� ,�� O C,AO ti ti
DATE OF REPORT ,�4' ��'4v 4, �Q � Q �o ' c�, ,� 10 G �ti ���``' �v���4 `4``'� ��Q����� OTHER COMMENTS
�.vrNvnn 1 1.701 v v �v 1r Q'
t,`7 v `0 v
Q v Q r Q2 iJ
79 -13 (Bonus)
8 -20
see
comments
9 -11
''
August 1979 income OK, reverified for bonus funding
in May, 1980 and did not qualify
79 -14
8 -28
OK
...
Applicant withdrew application
79 -15
8 -29
OK
9 -4
1 9-11
A.
3
3,377
OK
X
X
X
X
79 -16 (Bonus)
9 -10
OK
3 -28
4 -8
—
Applicant withdrew until 1980 funding cycle
79 - (Bonus)
10-24
OK
11 -14
4 -8
see
ommen
1,650
"'
Rejected 4 -8 -80, reconsidered and approved 4 -24 -80
dropped - repayment agreement not executed
79 -18 Bonus
70-18.( Bonus)
1 -3
0
N 0
11- 9
4- 8
R
�
79 -19 (Bonus)
11-14
OK
11 -13
1 -8
A
5
I --
Dropped, would not execute repayment a reement
P 9
79 -20 (Bonus)
ll-lE
OK
3 -28
4 -8
A
5
5
X
X
X
X
79 -21 (Bonus)
ll-lS
OK
3 -28
4 -8
A
Fall 1 979 income -,OK, when reverified in Spring of 1 980
found to be income ineligible
i
1
TOTAL GRANT AMOUNT
36 690
'
Year IV allocation $26,670
Bonus funds received $10,020
*The Mi nnesota Data: Pri vacy Act prohi bi is , i denti f cati on of Grant appl i cants
APPENDIX E
HOME IMPROVEMENT GRANTS*
YEAR V FUNDING !!4
JULY 19 80 - JUNE 19 81 ti Q`' ti ° ° o ��' ° ° o``'
° � v � .Q. ZS OTHER COMMENTS
ul11 G V r KCrV K i .� —Q' ti� �� ��d �C.� �� �v Q Q����
FEBRUARY 1981 O k
�,�� ° c.� - �,�`7 �"� O, �`�
q �. �.�, Q � O � O . r � = -� �Q � °� �
80 MI
OK
9 -10
9 -16
A
6,000
6,000 1
X
X
X
x
R AP
80-2
7 -10
NO
80 -3 (Bonus)
7 -14
OK 1 1-81
PENDING
Bonus Funds - Missed October funding deadline
RAP
-4
7 -14
OK
1 9-10 (9
-16
A
2
2'570
X
X
X
RAP
-5
7 -14
OK
I 80 10 -3
10 -14
A
2
Pending
X
RAP
80 -6
7 -14,
OK
I
w
Dropped - would not execute repayment agreement
80 -7
7 -23
OK
9 -23
10 -14
A
2
2
X
i
X X
X
RAP
80 - 8
7 - 23
NO
,
r
80 -9
80 -10
7 -26
8 -18
OK
OK
10 -3
1 10 -8
10 -14
10 -
A
A
2,000
3,000
2
X
X
X
--
Dropped would not submit income certifications
RAP
Accessibility program for driveway !4 wheel chair ramp
80 -11
8 -20
OK
10 - 3
1 10 -14�
A
6
3
X
X
, X
8 -12
7 -6
NO
I
I
--
80 -1 3
8 -25
OK
10 -3
X10 -14
A
2.000
Pending
r
X
i
j
Reconsideration 2 -13 -81 for higher grant a mount
TOTAL GRANT AMOUNT
*The Minnesota Data Privacy Act prohibits identification of Grant applicants
APPENDIX E
HOME IMPROVEMENT GRANTS*
YEAR V FUNDING
JULY 19 80 - JUNE 4 Q ~~ � --" o � ~� V V Q ,�4�, ,`B c � ` 's .._•.J o_c�, a4. c.`� _���� c,��.. Q',•ti „�!. OTHER COMMENTS
��, �� �, Q Q - ��;
:FEBRUARY 1981 O v � ti �-
�� $ O o
qQ : �o o� off,
a � o o v
(partial
80 -14 ,bonus)
8 -11
OK
10 -3
10 -14
A
3
5
X
80 -15
B -29
OK
10 -1
10 -14
A
6
3
X
1
X
X
RAP
80 -16
9 -3
NO
80 -17
10 -30
NO
r..
*RAP - weatherization by RAMSEY ACTION PROGRAM
•
i I
25,184 Year V allocation
10,000 Bonus Funds (estimate)
TOTAL GRANT AMOUNT
' $26,432 + (3 approved applications pending final bid estimates)
*The Mi nnesota Data Privacy Act prohibi identification of Grant applicants
EXHIBIT F
JANUARY 7, 1981
1
MAPLEWOOD REVIEW
Orr,
� S � O�- � it � ♦ r ::'h � t _ -..rte a '�T
♦ - J .,: � �� L ysR r ..�C,f �`�, --. � `+�,'��.rM'y- s • • -�'. _ a.... '. � `•f ,
~ ` � .��•c'' -''��k *r�,�•` [''
: ♦_ r." °'^. .'-' -•.} `�, - c'•.♦:
ns•-� „Y_ e ' �#1 •� ' •
.. . � "•.,(•" �' t �'� r'+'s' ! rL.: >���lt '... jtr� i k,�Y. 7 L•� ,a_ 74 G j � � . i � �
� �� e., ci' - ;ii 1.,, -'�-•' +�.r�. �,,;. �.:,n.�i?' ..� ; tom'.. , 4,._ o ma a' ; '.
e
- "�• _ = .F1 -sr.�. �;�,� ��
� r... -- a :.+:.. ,,;�.,�' .a_, +:r � � �.�•� ~' 1 - -a•= }•_..� 15 -�:
- lam ,;.... -.. ---^ .' � ..'� -.� ..` - __•``'.��"•`.- ` -•_... �"- �•..�,,,,. ~ -,� �` -' .
THIS CENTURY -OLD house in Maplewood is the first to be" undergoing
rehabilitation work under a new housing program. ' _ _ •� . - =={ '� _
f * r
AA"plewood h is I
- reno ted
r r o r
u - n a - r a.
A century -old house in central
rehabilitated under this program will .
Maplewood is the first to undergo
have incomes falling within the Section 8
rehabilitation work under a new
rental assistance guidelines +, ,.•�-
federally- subsidized "moderate -reha-
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency
bilitation program." , -
also has a grant program to help
The rental home is located at IBM
homeowners whose, gross family income
English St. The program assists building
is less than $6,000 a year fix up ;heir
owners of rental property in receiving
houses.
" loan money up to $37,500 at nine percent
The money is to be used for fare
-- interest
necessity improvements Ike upgrra`IE4
- • ' throe
The funds are made available through
electrical whin plumbing or iBSU�atioa,
g, p g
.
the Minnesota Housing_ Finance Agency.- explains Rosemary Fagrelius . ate " -
This rental rehabilitation program also is
_ MetropoIitan Council '. w (lousing.;,
tied with Section 8 rent assistance
Program, which is administered through
Redevelopment Authori ; �'`.•}Y
Under this second program.- ff • #he
the • federal Housing and Urban
homeowner lives inbis orber base fac 7
Development department - , _-
years or longer after receiving The grant,;
ha to be back.
All new occupants of his house in
the money does not paid
.•.
Maplewood, and similar buildings
Fagrelius said::: ::: '�
EXHIBIT G
Ilennepin County
Continued
Eden Prairie
Edina
Excelsior
Golden Valley
Greenwood
11opk i n s
i.ony Lake
Maple Grove
Mudicine Lake
Minn
Minnetonka
Mlnnetonka Deach
Mifinetrista
Mound
New (lope
Orono
Osseo
Plynvouth
Richfield
►-' flobbinsdal e
St Anthony
St. t.ouis Park
Shorewood
Spring Park
Tonka Day
Wayzata
Woodland
COUNTY TOTAL
Ram County
�► +a �,,�
.
'
110USE1101
Const.
FAM 1 LY
48
Pose ble
$12 1 00 0 1 000
Fair
Dollar
Units
Unite
Possible
1 ►09sable
Fair
Dollar
Units
Units
Share
fair
New OR
Exist.
Percent
Share
Cons
I1s
1.05
126,288
29
35
2.56
306,859
71
86
.19
23,229
5
6
1.23
148,077
34
41
.02
2,474
1
1
1.39
166,546
38
47
. .08
9
2
3
1.10
132,111
30
37
.02
2
0
1
24.76
2,970,605
684
831
1.79
214,437
49
60
.02
2,073
0
1
.08
9,792
2
3
.33
39,177
9
11
.87
104,769
24
29
.24
28,882
1
8
014
17,133
4
5
2.15
257,498
59
72
1.87
224
52
63
.50
59
14
17
.61
72,869
17
20
2.24
269,057
62
75
.22
26,553
6
7
.17
20,846
5
6
.04
5
1
1
.25
30,336
7
8
.01
1,632
0
0
53.99
f
6,479,278
1489
1812
Table 1 (Cont.)
�D TYPE GOALS FOR COMMUNITIES
LARGE FAN C LY
$2,400
Po sIble E'ossTble
Fair Dollar Unite Units
Share Fair New OR Exist.
Percent Share Const. 11sng.
1.33 31,892 5 0
2.60 62,424 11 15
.31 7 1 2
1.35 32 6 8
.02 598 0 0
1.21 29,130 5 7
.09 2 0 1
1.17 28,020 5 7
.02 524 0 0
20.86 500,586 85 122
1.80 43 7 11
.02 415 0 0
.09 2,061 0 1
.39 9,275 2 2
.98 23,409 4 6
.26 6,250 1 2
.21 5,007 1 1
j 2.12 50,824 9 12
1.48 35,607 6 9
.47 11,300 2 3
.54 12,897 2 3
1.83 43 8 11
.23 5,609 1 1
.24 5,808 1 1
005 1,165 0 0
.20 6,763 1 2
.01 326 0 0
49.96 1,198,731 203 293
r ; 1 1 1'1 !4+ J.
Total Total
Possible Possible
Units
ELDERLY
'
$9 000
Const.
ll snq_.
48
Pose ble
Poee le
Fair
Dollar
Units
Unite
Share
Fair
New OR
Exist.
Percen
Share
Const.
Ilsn
.60
65
14
20
4.06
389,315
83
122
.39
37',664
B
12
1.33
127,930
27
40
.04
3,853
1
1
1.21
116,550
25
37
.13
12,794
3
4
.59
56,944
12
18
.02
2,013
0
1
26.23
2
534
790
1.49
143,002
30
45
.04
3,302
1
1
.13
12,618
3
4
.30
36,618
8
11
1.21
116,368
25
37
.37
35,517
0
11
.15
14,157
3
4
1.14
109,550
23
34
1.06
178,378
30
56
.87
03,790
1 8
26
.48
45,702
10
14
3.51
337,312
72
106
.22
21,216
5
7
.19
18,336
4
6
.07
7,069
2
2
.17
16,467
3
5
.(13
2,688
1
1
54.45
5,259
1112
1639
Total Total
Possible Possible
Units
Unita
New OR
Exist.
Const.
ll snq_.
48
63
165
223
14
20
67
89
2.
2
68
91
5
0
47
62
0
2
1303
1743
86
116
1
2
5
8
19
24
53
72
16
21
8
10
91
118
96
128
34
46
29
37
142
192
12
15
10
13
3
3
11
15
1
1
2904
3744
Arden Hills
.63
75,991
17
21
!Falcon 11eights
.26
30,605
7
9
Gem lake
.04
4,536
1
1
Lauderdale
.17
20,877
5
6
Little Canada
.57
67,903
16
19
M.-�nl�+wnnci
1_ 56
1 07.503
1.00
52
ttoundsview
.47
55,982
13
16
New 11righton
1.06
127,653
29
36
North hake ,
41,696
12, 525
3
4
North St. Pau
032
37,017
9
11
Roseville
2.00
239,883
55
67
St. Paul
10.42
1
208
350
Shoreview
.90
108,521
25
30
Vadnais lleiyhte
.39
46,773
11
13
White Bear lake
.48
57,033
13
16
White Bear Twh.
.17
20,547
5
6
COUNTY 'TOTAL
19.54
2
540
657
.62
14,890
3
4
.24
5,812
1
1
.05
1,103
0
0
.10
2,488
0
1
.59
14
2
3
1.04
44 241
8
11
. 5H
13,
13
19
1.00
25,993
4
6
.11.
2,740
0
1
.37
8,966
2
2
1.74
41,696
7
10
10.95
262,687
45
64
.05
10,439
3
5
.44
10,657
2
:!
.70
16,844
3
4
.18
4,264
1
1
20.44
490,844
83
119
.24
23 453
5
7
.24
2 2,570
5
7
.02
1,526
0
0
.09
0,909
2
3
.40
30,496
0
12
1.0E
102 070
22
32
.64
60,973
13
19
.13
12,525
3
4
.21
20, 288
4
1,0
1.0R
177,766
38
6
18.00
1.727,997
367
542
.53
51,117
11
16
.15
14,669
3
5
.64
60
13
19
.17
15,990
3
5•
24.74
2,374,701
504
744
25
32
13
17
1
1
7
10
26
73
34
95
22
30
46
61
15
19
100
133
700
956
39
51
16
21
29
39
9
12
1127
1520
1
Form Approved
APPFNnT X H- OMB No. 63•R1471
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
1 . NAME OF APPLICANT
1
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
City of Maplewood
HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN
2. APPL ICATION /GRANT NUMBER 4
B
—
—
1
i'
TABUE SURVEY OF HOUSING CONDITIONS
3. PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY
4,
5. DATE OF SURVEY(S) USED
�X� ORIGINAL
Met
O COUnCi 1
'
1 �:,�;��.���'�KEYPUNCH CODE '•�.•s . '�
FROM: 10-1980 TO. 9 -1983 +
L_J REVISION, DATE
C� AMENDMENT, DATE
' r �- "' ' •'' !• :' '`
NUMBER OF HOUSING UNITS
ALL UNITS
OWNER
RENTER
STATUS AND CONDITION
YEAR OF
OF ALL HOUSING.UNITS
ESTIMATE
TOTAL
SUITABLE FOR (
REHABILITATION*
TOTAL
SUITABLE FOR
REHABILITATION
SUITABLE FOR
REHABILITATION
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(Q)
(f)
(g)
'(h)
1
1. Occupied Units - Total
1980
8740
6940
1800
Cad
(C)
(a)
(C)
(a)
(c)
2
a. Substandard
1974
704 •
695
598
590
106
105
3
b. Standard (line 1 minus line 2)
1 980
6342
1694
4
2. Va cant Available Units -Total
1980
112
30
82
1980
(c)
5
a. Substandard
9
9
3
3
6
6
6
b. Standard (line 4 minus line 5)
1980
27
76
7
3. Housing Stock Available - Total
j
(sum of lines 1 and 4)
' 1980
8852
6 97 0
1882
8
4. Standard Housing Stock Available - Total
~
(sum of lines 3 and 6)
1980
6369
1770
< <
9
5. Current Standard Available
Vacancy► Ram . , �,
i 1980
v
oil-
I o
�. • t
(line 6 -;- line 8)
.4/
.
DEFINITIONS, DATA SOURCES, AND METHODS (Attach additional sheets, if necessary, and identify with items above.)
1. Definition of "substandard" used. 5 • Footnotes
2. Definition of "suitable for rehabilitation" used.' •
SEE .VARRA I VE
3. Data sources and methods used.
4. Special housin conditions.
* Required only if the applicant proposes rehabilitation as a part of its Housing Strategy and as a goal for housing assistance.
Replaces Form HUD - 7015.8, which is Obsolete
HUD -7091 (6 -78)
UM B No. W-141411
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
1. NAME OF APPLICANT `
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
a
2 . APPLICATION /GRANT NUMBER
HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN
B
TABLE II -1 — HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS of LOWER- INCOME HOUSEHOLDS
3. PERIOD OF APPLICABII!I`t ' ..j..
4
5. DATE OF SURVEY(S) USEiP. -I I ij'�'
+1.'�' : ,•' ,
ORIGINAL
..._,
Metro Counci 1 (AHOP)
! `' "'; -'
:; '': '' KEYPUNCH CODE
(J REVISION DATE
y County
R amsey
��;?) %' ; t' i
, ,. : � ;, t.: B•� ,. �. ��� ;..4,
, ' ,
10 -1980 : 10 -1983
FRO •
AMENDMENT
A, DATE
, .
� , •. , ► , - ,. , �.. • ,�. `':� • : _�
•
' L' Y' 1 i 1
. r
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
ALL HOUSEHOLDS ALL roINORiTY HOUSEHOLDS ALL FEMALE - HEADED HOUSEHOLDS
STATUS OF HOUSEHOLDS
ELDERLY ELDERLY SMALL LARGE
ELDERLY SMALL SMALL LARGE
LARGE
(1 (1.2 FAMILY FAMILY FAMILY FAMILY
REQUIRING ASSISTANCE
FAMILY FAMILY
persons) (4 or persons) (4 or (5 or p ersons) 4 (5 0
TOTAL (5 or TOTAL TOTAL and less more
-
and and less more
less more HANDI • persons)
HANDI - persons) persons) p ) ersons HANDI - persons) persons)
CAPPED CAPPED CAPPED
(a)
(b - 1)
(b•2)
(b -3)
(b -4)
(c -1)
(c -2)
(c -3)
(c - 4)
(d - 1)
(d -2)
(d•3)
(d -4)
1
A. Total Owner Households
87
33
21
33
5
0
2
3
10
5
5
0
(sum of lines 2 and 3)
2
Owner Households to be
Displaced during the
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
three y ear pro
3
Owner Households
(ex cluding displacees)
87
3 3
21
33
5
G
2
3
10
5
5
0
4
Percentage of Total
by Household Type \
1 00%
38
I 24
38 %
5
B. Total Renter Households
(sum of lines 6 7 and 8)
783
79
646
58
54 1 5
26
23
253
34
211
8
6
Renter Households to be
Displaced during the
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
three year program
-
7
Renter Households
(excluding displacees)
783
79
646
58
54
5
26
23
253
34
1 211 1
8
(a) i
8 Households Expected to Reside
9 Percentage of Total
10 83 7
by Household Type 1 100% % % 96
NARRATIVE (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) (a) ERT estimates are included in the fair share AHOP goals for Maplewood
1. Data sources and methods.
2. Special housing needs of lower- income households.
Replaces Form HUD- 7015.9, which is Obsolete
Page 1 of 2 Pages
HUD -7092 (6-78)
Form Approved
OMB No. 63R•1471
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
1, NAME OF APPLICANT
City of Maplewood
U .S.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
2. APP LI CAT ION /G RANT NUMBER
. HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN
ASSISTANCE
NEE DS OF LOWER - INCOME HO
r
TABLE 11- -z HOUSING
• ...: � ' . �• i
4 '
. , .
5 DATE OF SURVEY(S) USED ;,;,�,,;' , ' ;.v r•
- Metropolitan Council
PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY
ORIGINAL
K�1�pUNCH CODE(,'
R ams ey County 12-2-80 •
Rams '
I GATE
REVISIO
f•.,,,1'•f' V r;•.+,, 82 '`., ` , ' t
4 ' +•
FROM: 1 0 .. 1980 TO. 10 -1983 0 AMENDMENT, DATE
.
PROVIDE DATA FOR EACH CATEGORY OF MINORITY HOUSEH OLD, AS APPROPRIATE
(Check appropriate box) (Check appropriate box)
(Check appropriate box)
1, Reserved
1. Reserved
1. Reserved
2. [� Black, not Hispanic 2. �j Black, not Hispanic
2, � Black, not Hispanic
3, = America Indian or Alaskan Native 3, (� American Indian or Alask an Native
3, � American Indian or Alaskan Native
4, C] Hispanic
STATUS OF MINORITY
4, Q Hispanic
4. � Hispanic
5, [] Asian or Pecific
5. � Asian or Pacific Islander Islander
' HOUSEHOLDS LDS R EQU I R I NG
HOUS
5. [] Asian or Pacific Islander �
ASSISTANCE
ELDERLY SMALL LARGE
ELDERLY ELDERLY SMALL LARGE
(1-2 (1-2 LARGE (1 -2
FAMILY FAMILY
(1 -2 FAMILY FAMILY
persons)
(4 or (5 or
FAMILY FAMILY persons) (5 or
persons) (4 or
TOTAL and ( or (5 or TOTAL and less more
.
TOTAL and less more
HANDI • p ersons) persons)
p
HANDI- less more HANDI• p ersons)
Persons) persons) CAPPED persons)
CAPPED
CAPPED
( - 2) (g (g - 4) (h - 1) (h - 2) (h•3) (ham)
(g - 1) g
(e)
(f -1) (f -2) (f -3) (f-•4)
Tot al Owner Households
t A. Tot
5 0 2 3
0 0 0 0
(sum of lines 2 and 3)
2 Owner Households to be
Displaced during the
0
0
three year program
H h ld
Owner Household
' 3
5 0 2 3
0 0 0 0
(excluding displacees)
a B Total Renter Households
39 4 26 g
15 I 1 0 14
(sum of lines 5 and 6)
5 Renter Households to be
Displaoeq,op. ' lg,,,the
o
0
three year program
6 Renter Households
39 4 26 9
15 1 0 14
in dis lacees)
(excluding p
•
REMARKS
*T • Gordon
� inn
292 -7247 I ndoChi nese Data •
All 15 fami 1 i es are Section 8 qual i f� ed
•
A total of
per family
66 i ndi Vi dual or 4.4 pe rsons P
HUD -7092 (6 -78)
Page 2
of 2 Pages
Form Approved
OMB No. 63-R1471
1.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
1. NAME OF APPLICANT
Ci ty of Maplewood
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
2. APPLICATION /GRANT NUMBER
HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN
TABLE 111 - THREE YEAR HOUSING PROGRAM
B
—
—
THREE YEAR GOAL
4., ORIGINAL -- r
3. PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY
`
- KEY -.
OM .: TO
-
PUNCH
�-
El REVISION, DATE
0 September 198
October, T-8 p
- CODE -��
-E - - -"
El AMENDMENT, DATE
--
NUMBER OF LOWER - INCOME HOUSEHOLDS TO BE ASSISTED
ELDERLY
SMALL
LARGE
TYPES AND SOURCES OF HOUSING ASSISTANCE
TOTAL
(1 -2 persons)
AND
FAMILY
FAMILY
HANDI-
CAPP E D-1J
(4 or less
Persons)
(5 or more
persons)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
15
6
3
6
A. Total Goals for Housing Assistance for Homeowners
(sum of lines 2 and 5)
1. New Construction Assistance for Homeowners
(sum of 3 and 4)
HUD Assisted Programs
C?ther*
2. Rehabilitation Assistance for Homeowners
15
6
3
6
(sum of lines 6, 7 and 8)
Community Development Block Grants
I
H Assisted Programs
--
_
I Other* MHFA Home Im rovement rant
5 --
i B. Total Goals for Housing Assistance for Homeowners by progra
100%
40
20 %
40
Percentage of Hou sehold Type
C. Total Goals for Housing Assistance or enters
68
7
57
4
(sum of lines 11, 14, 17 + 23)
I 1. Assistance for Prospective Homeowners
O
`
(sum of lines 12 + 13)
2 HUD Assisted Programs
3 Other*
1 2. New Rental Units
41
5
38
3
(sum of lines 15 + 16)
5
3
HUD Assisted Programs Section 8
41
3
6 Other *
1
7 3. Rehabilitation of Rental Units
7
O
7
(sum of lines 18, 19 + 22)
—
g Community Development Block Grants
g HUD Assisted Programs (sum of lines 20 + 21)
0 Substantial Rehabilitation
1 Section 8 Existing with Moderate Rehabilitation
7
( 7 I
13 4. Existing Rental Units
20
2
17
(sum of lines 24 + 27)
1
�4 HUD Assisted Programs (sum of lines 25 + 2
20
2
17
15 With Repair
•
►6 Without Repair Section 8
17
07. Other *"
►8 D. Total Goals fog Housing Assistance for Renters by
1 00%
%
_ % I
84
%
Percentage of household Type
.P9 E. Total Goals for HUD Assisted Rental Units by _
100%
10 96
84 _ ' %
6
Percentage of Household Type
--
s
4 A R R AT I V E (Attach additional sheets if necessary and identify with items above)
1. Footnote units to be provided specifically for the handicapped.
2. Describe the programs listed under this category.
3. Describe those actions necessary to facilitate the accomplishment of the goals.
CHECK IF APPLICANT WISHES TO REVIEW ALL STATE HFDA HOUSING PROPOSALS: E
evious Edition is Obsolete , HUD -7093 (10 -78)
Form Approved
V.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
WIVIU V. U%Aln
1. NAME OF APPLICANT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
C 't of Maplewood
HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN
2. APPLICATION /GRANT NUMBER
TABLE iV - GENERAL LOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED
HOUSING
B
—
—
—
—
3. PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY
KEY -.. >a;;`+
4. ORIGINAL
FROM ;=
1 0_1980 9-1983 =:PUNCH i-
'+��xr
CODE:.
E] REVISION, DATE —:
_
AMENDMENT, DATE
w ..
A. IDENTIFY GENERAL LOCATIONS ON MAP IN THIS APPLICATION
1. New Construction: Census Tract or Enumeration District Numbers, or other locational designation
Refer to attached Census Tract Enumeration Map
2. Rehabilitation: Census Tract or Enumeration District Numbers, or other locational designation
Both rehabilitation programs apply City wide and are available on a fi come
first serve basis to eligible applicants
B. EXPLANATION OF SELECTION OF GENERAL LOCATIONS
). New Construction
.Low and moderate income housing should be developed in areas already p rovi ded with
sewer and water services, as opposed to areas where major new extensions to sewer and
water mains would be required to serve the development
.Low and moderate income housing units should not be concentrated within one single
residential ne ighborhood p hborhood i n Maplewood
ewood
.Low and moderate income housing units should be located in areas with o
god
- .access,
within walking distance of mass transit routes Or thoroughfares
.The units should be located with ood access to commerc a '
9 i l face l - I t� es and other
services.
2. Rehabilitation '
Preference i s given to eligible a applicants cants resi di •
pp residing within a 6 block radius. of a
housing - project subsidized by the State or Federal government
rieplacps norm NUU- /Ul5.11, which is Obsolete HUD -7094 (6 -78)
A C 0 E
H
K
L
-71'
ton
MUNICIPAL• OF
MAPLEWOOD
"I q A sm" of no
'7 ,.1,, 1 '` L .04 ' ,.. y L W?Off-SOTA DEPARTMENT OF MG14WAYS
LiAr- 0 crylw"A now INT1111 I"
% US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
IN nDERAL HICJ4WAT ADMINMILATIOM
IIAI• CWTAWW IM &W P•tt"= " "If
A219 OIL L I-.
TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSIT
PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING DrWSION
'.4 Y _. OFFICE OF
" • I
424
AN
TRMSPORTA11ON PLANNING
01
Tj �
m.j=== het 3m emir_ =
-
9 423. 01 ".up". %.,! I I
TON,
if- all
m
r ule 1 4 Of
A402 N-
K.- XZI
410 OI
4 4
• J A F 4011
fire-
1A
IV LEGEND
0 13
........... .
ofte
ve. -3-
I
No 00
N, L
42 .02
423, 02"
+ 41mov".-
4
422.02 14
Co.
rAr
LN Not LA 11? orvmm
N- I
L 1,
Nov
J " A. - �_ I %. "LOA-As, Lo"
422.01
P
t
r
I for !
; 4,
1_4 . ....... � � � � � - ��• � �� � ° °�•
"ft of :: beet • C&PO• F .1 t-9100 1• t•1 voGwpj;G AV: :.I I ~Sir M. 4.0.4 CENSUS TRAC beet a 4 - OT
4:tj I T
::III of. 1.0.6 li s t . I IN
•4011 It 0-4 11 it t•11 No
$Otis of. ....6 •
it, 0.4 go - l ow; off. to.) IRAIII~ 11. 1 111 1
••••r No
No
I IV to
eat 401
it. of Awl 1 .1) Z off.
0.1 1 :0 % w** 1? to 6 4
Mi of. 91 So" I I t-4.1.6 :4 Commit 4-01.10 -80 1 J
gkftlo" ". C-A.J.& 9 " I . I . . - �' a.. - 4"'
40, sr. I t- 8 • v ; 1 L : "! - . '. * 1 4 . 1. 1. 1 -S I . r� i' ,,
At 911118 If. 1-1.6 ft C.9-6 -A 004 1 re 3 ENUMERATION
div%wrol f-•. {.141 BM%AftV AVOID 0.1 1 .1 9 "4. q.t-Ijo.14 I 004P vit 739,
me" " 9.1 16 ".ve,
Waves If L♦ Woe •
cf. 10 1 "09,140 siourelc•olf owl. B.11
, 1. :1. ■&O• all. Co .0.9 tftrft K. •.I.
• tobwtf all %em"I sales I.F-4 memoscome 0% vs -""it% N1. •:1 9" 491.1 4•1 425.0 1 a..425 •
It 02'0-W/
ou to it& 1414141 10: L am: I I I •N# Cf
Motive 11 1.1 d io jj
owl ftofto$Le" go. I go
we SA �i -..M--Pm" _R
6.• 1 emo 6". to 19 J!!�i 1
"-A Its It •
to Net 6 towq a d t a I." s all 11'.11 9
of4o et.t fool 1 It -4.16 IT 9. 8.1 loolooll ✓ so C .4 't
•I % "wo owl 1 0 • tv" MITI* 11 1.04
t 'el r ag
lwtvdm IT. j taw
7 t . . . ..' ,
Veove if. 1:6.6 It I TV,
AN
(I I Gov,
t i. :r ki '
#emm•f 114 :0r so p .. i
. I No-
I .Mot .Mot am ; owl. 919-9 lt
:::$" O.P.6 w►•'St 1 6-4.1 IT -
10 VI, • • 0 J.'q
061 •e+•00• con" #It o--;, 4"60 0
CpWN 1 0". 4-11
09 ;Vs,. 0.,, Z It ...699 if "WIM 11. lot No 9.6 Undeveloped Land
I : I 10 r-6 to 4. -r " 19
ON 11• "v"
0. 'Aw feel It. 1
I- .6
velvet lot" 0.4.0: 4, -fig. mR_
ow" NI ••1• ::9 - : :" it: :":w
: 0111 : 11 all. to-,"If :'3 Planned for Medium
t 410,001" 1 1.1.9 low I I I ov"' 1 6 1 -as 9- 1.
'AIR
AN "well, Coo 9-6
VIN& or Hi g h Densi t
Towa W 91. tt to"
to, wt.'.
peeve " 1: 4 ►go 0 :4 *10 awl
• al Use
1.6 20 Resident
hl No 1 0 ft 1-4 14.
'01:0evel Cie. 4 .1 1 1 0.60 W
plug 691 1
TV, 0 " AV Slow • mq
:M2 •A" 11P.
:: "two to • 111:11
. : V el m e : ow"I " • 0•• tit 11 ••,
, WAMWMA
show" fell 0". 1.0-6
IPI#4�loo I" J�j fir
to4ftat "1. 4.1-11.19 Immig go• 8%. 6.6 1.0.1
~ Ire! tysef•r•
09 $1, 6.4 viol of A.%.&
%llot: Awl K L K
trw it 1.1 :";-•
••W AT I go- •
NARRATIVE
HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN 1980 - 1983
TABLE I SURVEY OF HOUSING CONDITIONS
Oupied Units
Total housing stock available" (line 7 estimates, as of 4 -1 -80, were provided
)
b y Metro Council Housing Staff. Vacancy data (line 4) was applied to these
figures, hen ce l i n e 1 figures. below for an explanation of vacancy date) .
g ures .
Vacancy and Turnover
The figures in line 4 represent conditions present in September, 1980. This
data was compiled by Metro Council Staff from Northern States Power electrical
service information. During this period, as in the past, Mapl ewood' s vacancy
and turnover rates, as a whole, were lower than experienced by Ramsey County
and the Metro Region.
Substandard Units
Subs 'Candard units "suitable for rehabilitation" figures were derived from a wind-
shield survey conducted in 1974 by the Metro Council
The definition of SFR was as follows (1974 dollars):
Major Rehabilitation: Large units needing $10,000 or more to rehabilitate
and small units needing more than $7,500 in Rehab-
ilitation.
Substantial Rehab -
ilation
Some Rehabilitation
Large units needing $5,000 to $10,000 to rehab-
ilitate, and small units needing $4,000 to $7,500.
Less than substantial, but needing some rehabilitation
to make the unit safe and healthful. (reference
uniform building code).
The units shown as substandard for the most part are housing stock that was built
prior or to 1939. This information was taken from the 1970 census.
Footnotes:
a The data collected from the 1974 Metro Councul survey was not presented
in cate ones of renter and owner. Based upon 1970 "Lack of plumbing"- data,
9
by tenure, it appears that approximately 15/ of the substandard units were
rented, hence, the owner and rental estimates listed i n l i n e 20
3
r
Substandard vacant units were stimated by determining the percentage of
occupied units which were substandard and then applyi ng !percentage to
"total vacant units ".
Substandard units suitable for rehabi 1 i tati on were estimated on the basis
of the City of Maplewood' s past four years of experience with the MHFA Home
Improvement Grant Program. During this period, only one applicant in 74
I
(1.3/) possessed a dwelling which was questionable as far as cost-effective-
ness of rehabi 1 i tation.
Definition of Substandard
(a) General. Any building or portion thereof including any del 1 i ng unit,
guest room or suite of rooms, or the premises on which tht same is
=�
located,, in which there exists any of the following 1 i ste& condi ti ons
to an extent that endangers the life, limb, health, property, safety, or
welfare of the public or the occupants thereof shall be deemed and hereby is
declared to be substandard building:
(b) Inadequate Sanitation. Inadequate sanitation shall include but not be
limited to the following:
1. Lack of, or improper water closet, lavatory, bathtub or shower in a
dwelling unit.
2. Lack of, or improper water closets, lavatories, and bathtubs or showers
per number of guests in a hotel.
3. Lack of, or improper kitchen sink.
4. Lack of hot and cold running water to plumbing fixtures in a ho.tel .
5 . Lack of hot and cold running water to plumbing fi xutres in a dwelling
unit.
6. Lack of adequate heating facilities
7. Lack, or improper operation of required ventilating equipment.
8. Lack of minimum amounts of natural light and ventilation required by
this Code.
9. Room and space dimensions less than required by this Code.
10. Lack of required electrical lighting.
11. Dampness of habitable rooms.
12. Infestation of insects, vermin or rodents as determined by the
health officer.
13. General di 1 api dati on. or improper maintenance.
Y
14. Lack of connection to required sewage disposal system.
15. Lack of adequate garbage and rubbish storage and removal
fac as determined by the health officer.
2
( c) Structural Hazards. Structural hazards shall include but not be limited
to the following:
1. Deteriorated or inadequate foundations.
2. Defective or deteriorated flooring or floor supports . =,
3. Flooring or floor supports of insufficient size to carry imposed loads
with safety.
4 . Members of w a l l s , partitions, or other vertical supports that split,
lean, list, or buckle due to defective material or deterioration.
5. Members of wall, partitions, or other vertical supports that are of
insufficient size to carry imposed loads with safety.
6. Members of ceilings, roofs, ceiling and roof supports or other horizontal
members which sag, split, or buckle due to defective material or
deterioration.
7. Members of ceilings, roofs, ceiling and roof supports, or other horizontal
members that are of insufficient size to carry imposed loads with safety.
8. Fireplaces or chimneys which list, bulge, or settle, due to defective
material or deterioration.
Special Housing Conditions - Condor�li ni umi zati on
Conversion of traditional rental apartment units to condominiums or other forms
of individual unit ownership does not appear to have occurred in Mapl ewood to date.
The Ramsey County Recorder's office maintains records on all such conversions,
however, this information i s not readi accessible on a community basis.
Periodical as time permits, City staff will research these County records
to monitor for any change in the present situation.
From a City p erspecti ve, the issue is difficult to keep abreast of since there
is no provision i n State Statute that require City approval of this type of
activity. Most 1 i kely, the City will become aware of conversion activity, before
th e fact only f a buildi di n permit is sought for remodeling or rehabi 1 i tati on .
y 9 P
TABLE II HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS
Data P resented in Tables II-1 and 11-2 were provided by Metro Council housing
s ,taff and Ramsey County. Metro Council information for minorities was. updated
to reflect data obtained from Ramsey County regarding Indo Chinese households
residing in Maplewood. The Ramsey County data was current as of December 2, 1980.
TABLE III THREE YEAR GOALS
The oal s presented * i n this table are consistent with Metro Council AHOP Fair
9
Share Housing goals for Maplewood.
3
' f owi n i s a listing s ti n of Mapl ewood' s three -year HAP
For comparison, the g 9
goals relative to AHOP guidelines:
Metro AHOP Maplewood HAP
R
Assistance
By Tenure
Renter 82% 81% �
Owner 18 19
Uni t Type
New
Construction
Substantial
Rehabilitation
Existing
66/ 49/
2 0
32 51.
Household Type - Owner
Elderly/
Handicap 38/ 40/
Small Family 24 20
Large Family 38 40
Household Type - Renter
Elderly/
Handicap 1 10 �
Small Family 83 84
Large Family 7 6
Mapl ewood ' s fair s g hare housing goal for the three -year period covered by this
HAP ranges es from 73 (new) to 95 (existing) units. For accounting purposes, each
�
new unit equals 1.3 existing units (73 : 95) . Over the next three years
Ma l ewood' s g oal is to provide 80 units (51 new and 29 existing) of low to
p
moderate income come housi n g The - "unit type" allocation varies from the AHOP guideline
to more closely pp
osel approximate the Federal position of a 50/50 split between existing and new construction Section 8 monies.
19 80 HAP - Performance
All of the g o a l s , except new construction assistance for five homeowners were
attained. In 1979, Maplewood applied for and received a $72,000 CDBG for
scattered site housing. Unfortunately, the funds were diverted to the Maple
Knoll Section 8 project.
4
_Implementation
• is based upon new construction, each goal category participation in
p P
Except or
' in existence (i.e., Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation,
a program currently
Section 8
• , exis 9 tin g and the MHFA Home Improvement Grant) .
construction goal, Maplewood will continue to work with
developers, submitting To satisfy the new cons 9 o �' e n t being
n
DBG applications as necessary. This d cm g
� g � �' ess ta�be in a position
standing HAP, is an exampi e of Mapl ewood s w� 11 i ngn .�
a - free sta g
td" offer financial assistance to a project.
Through these programs, Maplewood lewood intends to continueto expand the quality an
q uantity t y of housing for low and moderate households .
1
1. MHFA Home Improvement 1p 5 30 45
Grant 3 6 6 15 N/A 15
Other ( b) 15 5 5 25
TOTAL 60 10 13 83 95 320 70 230 620
"Based upon Area Housing Oportunity Plan (AHOP) Fair Share Goals
(a) Each new construction unit counts 1.3 units toward a total (new and existing) goal for 95 units
(b) Could include tax increment financed redevelopment, public housing, or other housing programs which do not exist at the present time.`
APPENDIX G
•
SUBSIDIZED HOUSING ALLOCATION SCHEDULES
.
I
II
*
1980 -1983
1980 - 1990
HOUSING OPPORTUNITY GUIDELINES
PRO -GRAM TYPE
HOUSING_ GOALS
Family
Large
Family
Total Conversion
Elderly Units Factor (a
Total
Family
Large
Famil Elderl
Total
Rental
1. Sectio n 8
33
3
5 41 1
53
138
27 12
177
New Construction
2. Section 8
0
p
p 0 1.3
0
8
2 4
14
Substantial Rehabilitation
1
17
2 20 N/A
ZO
122
14 34
170
3. Section 8
.l
Existing
17
3 5
25
4. Section 8
7
0
0 7 N/A
7
Moderate Rehabilitation
p
10
14 0
24
5. Scattered Site
Family Housing
p -
p
0 140
140
6. Section 202
'
Owner
1. MHFA Home Improvement 1p 5 30 45
Grant 3 6 6 15 N/A 15
Other ( b) 15 5 5 25
TOTAL 60 10 13 83 95 320 70 230 620
"Based upon Area Housing Oportunity Plan (AHOP) Fair Share Goals
(a) Each new construction unit counts 1.3 units toward a total (new and existing) goal for 95 units
(b) Could include tax increment financed redevelopment, public housing, or other housing programs which do not exist at the present time.`
r ts",
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
-
Y g ..
FROM: Director of Public Works
--- DATE: April 9, 1981
SUBJECT: FINAL PAYMENT - A4ARYLAND AVENUE
PROJECT 77-12
This item requires two actions on the City Council's part.
The first to be considered is Contract Amendment No. 4. This
amendment to the contract represents a final settlement of
any claims or extras by the contractor. The final figure
of $97,000 was agreed upon after more than three months of
negotiations. The settlement just that, a settlement.
It is the staff's opinion that further negotiations would
be fruitless. The next step under the terms of the contract
would be arbitration. In that arena it is again the staff's
opinion that the City's situation would not be improved.
In fact, the City could come out worse off while incurring
the legal and staff expense of a lengthly arbitration process.
The engineer has submitted a short explanation of the items
considered in this contract amendment.
The second item requiring action is the final payment to the
contractor. The engineer has submitted his recommendation
and staff concurs.
It is recommended that the City Council approve Contract
Amendment No. 4 and authorize final payment to the contractor,
C. S. McCrossan, Inc.
KGH /mn
3
:.
WILLIAM D. SCHOELL
CARLISLE MADSON
JACK T. VOSLER
JAMES R. ORR
HAROLD E. DAHLIN
LARRY L. HANSON
JACK E. GILL
THEODORE D. KEMNA
JOHN W. EMOND
KENNETH E. ADOLF
WILLIAM R. ENSELHARDT
R. SCOTT HARRT
GERALD L. BA�fMAN
April 9, 1981
City of Maplewood
c/o Mr. Kenneth Haider, Director
of Public Works
1380 Frost Avenue
Maplewood,' Minnesota 55109
Subject: City of Maplewood, Minnesota,
Improvement Project No. 77-12,
Our File No. 9504.
Gentlemen:
Herewith is Contract Amendment No. 4 for the subject project.
This amendment deals with the overhaul costs associated with the
additional granular borrow installed through the swamp excavation
areas on East Maryland Avenue, Ferndale Street and Ivy Avenue,
The two major factors contributing to the need for the additional
material were the inability to use approximately 8,000 cubic yards
of material on the Ivy Avenue cut- -section because of the super
saturated moisture condition and silty nature and the grade change
on Maryland Avenue and Ferndale Street due to a higher ground-
water elevation. The enclosed letter from C. S, McCrossan, Inc.,
dated August 20, 1980, summarizes the overhaul costs .
This amendment also includes costs associated with price
escalation of work done in 1980 due to delays encountered in 1979.
A claim for the price escalation was initiated by letter on June 26,
1980, at which time the contractor requested an across - the - -board
20 percent increase in unit prices, plus additional mobilization.
Following a request by us for further breakdown and cost justifica-
t information, the contractor submitted the enclosed letter
dated January 7, 1981. The monies claimed in this letter amounted
td an increase of approximately 27.5 percent. Then following
five meetings of negotiations with the contractor, all parties
concerned agreed to a price escalation of 14.5 P ercent on the
work done In 1980. Based on $ 4 2.2 , 7 6 0 of work done in-' the
total price escalation amounts to $61,300.00. Please note that a
SCHOELL & MAOSON INC.
ENGINEERS AND SURVEYOR
ft
(612) 938 -7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 55343
SCHOELL & MAOSON, INC.
City *of Maplewood April 9, 1981
e
c/o Mr. Kenneth Haider, Director
of Public Works
Page Two
tcztal of $531,108 was constructed in 1980. The cost e`s calation
orUy applies to work specified for completion in 1979.
Contract Amendment No. 4, in the amount of $97,000.00, i s
recommended for approval.
Very truly yours,
SCHOELL & MADSON, INC.
f4
RSHarri :bk
enclosures
cc: C. S. McCrossan, Inc.
i ?
3
CONTRACT AMENDMENT # 4
DATED: Apr 8 1981
PROJECT:
MARYLAND AVENUE -- M . S . A . P . NO 138 -118-01,
IVY AVEUE , FE RNDALE
STREET, STERLING STREET - IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 7 -12
OWNER:
= CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
OWNER' S - PROJECT NO. 77-12
TO: C.
S. MCCROSSAN, INC., BOX AD, OSSEO, MINNESOTA, 55369
You are
directed to make the changes noted below in
the subject contract.
OWNER:
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD BY:
Barry
R. Evans, City Manager
BY:
DATE:
(John Greavu, Mayor)
DACE:
Nature of Change: For the overhaul costs associated
with the additional
52,500 tons of granular borrow through
the swamp
excavation area and for the costs
associated with price
escalation of work done in 1980.
(See itemized schedule attached.)
Original
Contract Price
$1,232,108.95
Total of
Previously Authorized Change Orders
$ 7
Net Increase Resulting from this Change Order
$ 97,000.00
Current Contract Price Including All Change Orders
$1,337,016.78
The above changes are approved:
SCHOELL & MADSON, INC.
ENGINEER.
BY : �i . � G0� gAAA-t�
R. Scott Harri
DATE: (.f pr /� 7, lqsl
C. SO MdC RO S SAN INC.
CONTRACTOR
BY:
DATE :- ;� .,_ �''► S
April 8, 1981
t
PROJECT: EAST MARYLAND AVENUE - M.S.A.P. NO. 138 - 118 -01
1
IVY AVENUE, FERNDALE STREET, STERLING STREET
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 77-12
=
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
MAPLEWOOD , MINNESOTA 55109
CONTRACTOR:, C. S. MCCROS SAN , INC.
BOX AD
OSSEO, MINNESOTA 55369
CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 4
ORIGINAL ESTIMATED CONTRACT AMOUNT:
$1,232,108.95
CURRENT ESTIMATED CONTRACT AMOUNT:
$1 , 2 4 0 , 016. 7 8
THIS AMENDMENT:
For the overhaul costs associated with the
additional 52,500 tons of granular borrow through
the swamp excavation area and for the costs
associated with price escalation of work done
in 1980.
.2105.521 Granular Borrow 52,500 Tons @ $0.68 /Ton =
$35,700.00
Cost Escalation Lump Sum
$61,300.00
TOTAL ADD:
$ 97 , 000. 00
REVISED ESTIMATED CONTRACT AMOUNT:
$1
t
GEE T RAL CONTRACTOR
425-410
BOX .41) • 08.sno, .11 t n n esol n 55309
---Now
t_
A-1r. Scott Harri
Schoell & 'tZadson, Inc.
50 Ninth Avenue South
Hopkins, 'Minnesota 55343
Dear A -1r. Harri:
n
1 �
August 20, 1980
Re: 'Maplewood Project 77-12
?Maryland Avenue, etc.
I am in receipt of your letter of July 11, 1980, in which you ask that
we withdraw our demand for extra compensation, at the rate of sixty - eight
cents ($0. 68) per ton, for the excess granular borrow- material.
Obviously our records do not agree with yours. In reviewing same,
I find that, in order to continue the controlling operations on the project,
mucking and granular embankment construction, at a time when sub
stantial overruns appeared to be unavoidable, I offered to furnish the first
10, 000 tons of additional material at the bid price of $1. 94 per ton. The
balance of the material was to be at a price reflecting our additional costs
of acquisition of the material and the overhaul.
In reviewing our performance, I both within and outside of the 'free
haul" zone(s) we found that the scraper cycle time was reduced from an
average of six round trips per machine, per hour, to the comparatively
slow pace of four round trips per machine, per hour. Obviously the fixed
costs of loading, placing, compacting, and finishing cause the unit cost of
the material to excalate significantly as the production rate of the scrapers
decreases:
Our bid was based on a .free haul distance of 800 feet which would
pr -a ide T ide for effective use of three Terex TS 14 scrapers, two D8 ractors,
one 825 roller; and a motor. . gra der. This equipment, with supervision,
operated at a cost of $526..00 per hour. At the six load per machine -hour
production rate, our cost was $1.85 per ton, and this was the basis of
bid. At the rate of four loads per machine- hour, which we attempted to
maintain, due to the extreme haul distances, our cost increased to $2 59
per ton.
Mr. Scott Harri
page 2
August 20, 1980
The simple summary of the issue(s) is that, due to the ne for
a - ubstantially greater quantity of material and the accompanyin- greater
hail distances, as well as the major delay caused by the tardy e -Recution
of pipeline relocation work, our costs increased significantly. Our
request, for -;0. 68 per ton, for that material in excess of the first
30, 000 tons is modest to say the least.
Thank you in antici of your - cooperation in this matter.
Sincerel T,
Ray Vite
Contract ?1Tanager
j n-1
i
r�-
*5o, 71tceA4"4gf "e.
GENERAL (:O T R. CTOR
425-4167
lux .a l) Osseo. .11 i n ri c.sol a 5,5309
June 26, 1980
h 10
s / , , ' c n
s s �
Y &
t.
Mr. Scott Harri _
Schoell Alladson, Inc,
50 Ninth Avenue South
Hopkins, MN
Re: Citv of 'Zapl ex� ood, Linnesota
Project No. 77-12
Dear fir. Harri:
I have, as we have discussed with both you and your staff, reviewed
the extra costs incurred to date in 1980 and have attempted to forecast
those additional costs yet to be incurred in 1980.
We are all aware of the causes of the dela,�rs, to date, and while
they are unfortunate, obviously they are beyond our control and should
be subject to additional equitable compensation. This additional co.
sation should, of course, be applied only to those items of work which
were to have, by specification, completed in 1979.
.Our costs have increased, over 1979 by the following ai
Nan - licensed equipment 2 0%
Licensed equipment 2 5%
Labor 13°(,
Asphalt cement 38 r{
Aggregates 29 %
Concrete 14°i(
Rather than dissect each unit of work by components, I would
suggest that each i tem of work performed in 1980, that was originally
scheduled for 1979, be compensated for at a rate 20 greater that the
original bid. Further, the additional cost of maintaining field offices,
sanitary facilities, utilities, and storage facilities would require additional
mobilization compensation of $2, 000. 00
1r. Scott Harri
Page 2 "of 2
June 26, 1980
I believe that after reviewing this proposal you u-ill concur 1V its
valibity and will affirmatively support it with your client, the Cit3-`of
., M -
Malt ewood. --
If you have any questions or further information to relate, please
contact me.
Sincer 1 ,
t
R aym nd 4 Hite
Contract Alanager
jM1
cc: AMr. Thomas Rooney, Shear & Rooney, Ltd.
w-
0
• ; W&eVO4" ��•
GENERAL CONTRACTOR
425 -4167
Box .41) • Osseo, .V i n n e sot n 5536 9
January 7, 1981
Mr. R. Scott Harri
Schoell & Madson, Inc.
Engineers & Surveyors
50 Ninth Avenue South
Hopkins, Minnesota 55 343
� o
y ` a
r
Re: Maplewood Project 77 -12
Dear Mr. Harri :
In response to your request for our total claim(s) on the above
referenced project, please be advised of the following additional
costs incurred by our firm due to the substantially increased quantity
of granular borrow required, the extraordinary measures required for
1979 curb and gutter construction, as well as the numerous delays due
to the tardy relocation of the Williams Bros, facilities, your ordering
our firm to cease hauling over the sur- charge area, the entrance
location problems at Beaver Hills, etc.
Labor $ 17
Equipment 22,852.03
Fuel 2
Aggregates 7 , 035 .45
Plant Cost 2
Asphalt Cement 11, 956.7 3
Interest on Retained Earnings 17,135 .51
Overhaul of Granular Borrow 35,700.00
Mobi liza -tion 19 , 214.20
s t
Winter Curb & Gutter Cost 1
Total $138,227,76
R A more detailed breakdown of these costs is attached for your
review. I trust that we will be able to meet on the issue (s) early
this month.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter. ='
since ely; ti
A 1
Raymo d J. Hite
Contract Manager
RH /e rw
enc:8
s
Maplewood ( 751)
Labor (Since 1/1/80)
Laborers
4733.9 hours
x $0.65
(1980 Increase)
= $ 3,077.04
Operators
4288.7 hours
x $0.70
(1980 Increase)
= 3
Teamsters
1772.2 hours
x $0.65
(1980 Increase)
= 1
Misc . Non - Classified
62 hours x $0.50 (1980
Increase)
= 31.00
Supervision (Foremen)
2213.5 hours
x $1.00
(1980 Increase)
= 2 , 213 .50
$ 9,475.56
Payroll
Overhead
x 1.598
15 1 141.94
Overhead
& Profit
x 1.15
$17,413.23
Maplewood ( 751) =�
Equipment & Fuel (Diesel & Gasol ine)
4.8 q
89.6 hours of equipment time at average increased cost of $4.064 per hour =
$19,871.33
10,914 gallons of fuel at average increased cost of $0.21 per gallon =
$ 2,291.87
$22,163.20
Overhead & Profit
$25,481.66
i
� t
3 �
y .
�= 2
BA -1
2361
Plant
Maplewood ( 751)
Ag & Plant Costs
203.69 tons x $0.80 = $ 162.95
5442.97 tons x $0.80 = 4
2133.93 tons x $0.75 - 1,600.45
$80.00 per hour 275TPH x 7780.59T = 2 , 256 .37
b /4.15
Overhead & Profit
i
Maplewood ( 751)
3
3 ;
7
i
Asphalt Cement $125.00 - $98.00
2361
6.1%
of
2133.93 =
130.17
tons
2341B
4.5%
o f
5 360 .18 =
241.21
tons
2341W
5.0%
of
82.79 =
4.14
tons
2331E
4.5%
of
7.50 =
0.34
tons
2331 Base
4.5%
of
165.69 =
7.46
tons
Curb
6.% of 15.50 =
0.93
tons
Curb
5.5%
of
15.00 =
0.83
tons
385.08
tons
x 27.00
$10,397.16
Overhead & Profit
x 1.15
$11,956.73
3
3 ;
7
i
. Maplewood ( 751)
Interest Cost on Earned Retainage (1/80 - 1/81 )
-i
$8M, 369.10 x 8�� months x 17% per annum =
$66,813.03 x 4� months x 17% per annum =
Overhead & Profit
-At
$10,641.11
4,259.33
$14,900.44
$17,135.51
Maplewood ( 751)
.� Extra Fixed Costs ( Mobilization)*
r
Feld Offices - 2 x 8 months x $425.00 month = $6,800.00
Overhead & Profit x 1.15
82U.UU
w
1
Maplewood ( 751)
Re-Mobilization(s) (Other than initial and Final)
Y
51: lowbov moves - 118 hours @ $50.00 1979 = $ 1
@ $60.00 1980
118 hours lost equipment time @ $30.67 average = 3
y,yUb.UU
Overhead & Profit
Y11,4y4.2U
•s.
i
i
3
Winter 1979 Curb & Gutter
Lencowski Double . Cover, Heat, & Chloride $8200
Repair 149x.00
$971.00
C. S. McCrossan Repair
Labor - Foreman 6 hrs @ $25.00 $150.00
Laborer 6 hrs @ $20.00 120.00
$270.00
Equipment - Compressor 6 hrs @ $ 8100 $ 48.00
Material Gas - 2 tanks @ $10.00 20.00
Expoxy - 3 gallons 160.68
Sub Total $1,469.68
Overhead & Profit x 1.15
$1,690.13
F
WILLIAM D. SCHOELL
CARLISLE MADSON
JACK T. VOSLER
,!% JAMES R. ORR
HAROLD E. DAHLIN
LARRY L. HANSON
JACK E. GILL
THEODORE D. KEMNA
JOHN W. EMDND
KENNETH E. ADOLF
WILLIAM R. ENC�LHAROT
R. SCOTT HARFV7
GERALD L. BAGMAN
� N
ScHOELLAD
�.M6�r�. MSacasao O INC.
ENGINEERS AN SURVEYORS
1612) 938 -7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 55343
April 9, 1981
City of Maplewood
c Mr. Kenneth Haider, Director
of Public works
1380 Frost Avenue
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Subject: City of Maplewood, Minnesota,
M. S .A.P. No 138- - 118 -01
Improvement Project No. .77-12,
Final Pay Request No. 13,
Our File No. 9504,
Gentlemen :
Herewith is the Thirteenth and Final Estimate from C. So
McCrossan, Inc,, for L payment for work completed on the subject
project. We have checked the estimate and inspected the work
and find the quantities represent final quantities. A final
inspection and approval has also been obtained from the District
9 State Aid office.
The final contract amount of $1,511,798.76 is 22.7 percent
above the original contract amount of $1,232,108.95. The
$279,689.91 over -run consists of the following elements,
ITEM
A MC)T TNT
Contract Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3
and 4 $104,907.83
Granular Borrow 121
Gravel Base 22,330.32
s
Miscellaneous 31,201.76
i
TOTAL $279 ,689.91
El
SCHOELL & MADSON, INC.
City of Maplewood April 9, 1981
c/o Mr. Kenneth Haider, Director
of Public Works
Page Two
In our February 14, 1980 letter to you, we projected an over -
ran of $186,000. Our projection did not include those costs in
Contract Amendment No. 4, which when added to the projection
nearly reflect the final project costs.
This final estimate in the amount of $102,000.00, less
$5,000.00, is approved and recommended for payment. We recom-
mend the $5,000.00 amount be withheld pending acceptable comple-
tion of a few miscellaneous punch list items pertaining to the
watermain system. Once the punch list items are completed, the
money can be released to the contractor, When that occurs, the
contractor will have received all money owed to him by the City
of Maplewood for this project. Therefore, payment at this time
is recommended to be $97,000.00
Very truly yours,
SCHOELL & MADSON, INC.
RSHarri:bk
enclosure
cc: C. S. McCrossan, Inc.
i
i Q
3 j
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Date April 9, 1981
City Project No's. 138- 118 -01 Bid No's.
Name and Nature of Project Maryland Ave
% Completed After This Estimate 100 %
-i
M
f.
r
---- ONTRACT AMOUNT.
ORIGINAL ..C............................. $
1,232,108.95
CHANGE ORDER
Now Date Approve Additions
De uctions
1 9 -28 -7
2 9-26-80
11, 588. 50
3 9 -26 -80 7
4 4 -16 -81 97
TOTAL ADD iTIONS ... ...............................
$
116
SUBTOTAL ......... ...............................
$
1 1 3 48,605.28
TOTALDEDUCT IOIIS .. ...............................
$
11, 588.50
CONTRACTAMOUNT TO DATE ...............................
$
1
TOTAL COMPLETED TO DATE ...............................
$
i f -11 798.76
MATERIALS STORED .. ...............
................ $
_
-0-
TOTAL COMPLETED AND STORED ............................
$
1,511,798.76
LESS RETAINAGE 0 %0 . . Lump. gum
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
5 f 000.00
TOTAL EARNED LESS RETA INAGE .....................
0 0 . . 0 0 $
1.150 1 6_, 798.76
LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS ...........................
$
1, 409, 798.76
Est, Now 1 Amt 10,676.25 Est,
No, 8 Amt 68, 614.11
Est, Now 2 Amt 105,497.36 Est,
No. 9 Amt 158,458.29
Est. No. 3 Amt 168, 736.48 Est,
No. 10 Amt 247,05.3.16
Est, No. 4 Amt 69,205.04 Est.,
No 11 Amt 43,422.90
Est. No. 5 Amt 237, 3.29.81 Est.
No, 12 Amt 96,928.38
Est. Now 6 Amt 103, 075.83 Est.
No. Amt
Est, Now 7 Amt 100,801.15 Est.
No Alwnt
Total Estimates 1, 409, 798.76
AMOUNT DUE THIS
97 , 000.00
Payment requested this 9th day of
April ,Q 81 •
l
C. S. McCrossan, Inc.
Contractor
.Box AD
Osseo, NAT 55369
Approved by City Council this
day of , 19
B
ESTIMATE FOR PAYMENT ON CONTRACT
Estimate No. 1 Final period f rom1 - 31 -80 to 4 -9 -81
Approved and recommended f or payment
this 9th day of Apri , 19 81 •
SCHOELL & MADSON , INC
Project Engineer
By: 6 C
R. Scott Harri
APPROVED:
By:
City Engineer
City Clerk
J -6
MEMORANDUM
e
SO-
TO: City Manager
F ROM: Director of Public Works
DATE: April 8, 1981
SUB JECT: 198 STRE OVE RLAY PROGRAM
The 1981 Budget provides the sum of $250,000 for the continuation
of the overlay program instituted last year.
Studies of the surface condition of the roadway system, the
economic desirability of confining the work to an "area", and
cost effectivness were some of the prime factors considered
in - the selection of an area.
The area recommended is bounded by Trunk Highway 61 on the
west, Hazelwood Avenue on the east, Larpenteur Avenue on the
south and the Soo Line Railroad on the north.
Within the area, State and County roads excepted, a block
by block priority system was established based upon ridability,
roughness, surface condition, subsurface condition, traffic
and cost.
Based on estimates of . the in -place cost per ton of the
bituminous surfacing and the yield per ton, and using the
assigned priorities, target streets within the area were
selected to conform to the limits set forth in the 1981 Budget.
These target streets are shown in red on the attached map.
f
In the event that the bid prices or the yield should depart
1
from our estimate the priority system would be applied to
determine the additions or deletions to the' project. These
additions or deletions toegther with their priority are also
shown on the map.
Due to extended lead time required for
necessary to the preparatory work that
by City maintenance forces, an early si
of an area and the streets within that
desirable.
certain materials
is to be performed
election an .approval
area is hicjhly
Staff further proposes a mid -May bid letting with actual
paving to get underway in July.
J -7
ME
-w -
TO: City Manager -_ +
- FROM: Director of Public Works
DATE: April 9, 1981
SU BJECT: BORDER STREETS WITH NORTH ST. PAUL
I
Recently I met with the City Engineer for North St. Paul,
Mr. David Kotilinek, concerning the sections of Beam Avenue
and Holloway Avenue common to both cities. North St. Paul
is in the process of considering upgrading Beam Avenue
from Indian Way to 2nd Street. The Maplewood side has con-
crete curb and gutter with a permanent street. The North
St. Paul side does not have curbs. In several locations
utility trenches cross the street leaving the surface some-
what rough. As part of the upgrading, North St. Paul pro-
poses to install a thin overlay for the entire street width.
This process would improve the rideability of the surface
and maintain the structural integrity of the street in Maple-
,
wood. Mr. Kotilinek estimates the work done on the Maplewood
side of Beam Avenue would cost approximately $5,500.
Holloway Avenue from Beebe Roadto Century Avenue was also
discussed. Approximately two- thirds of this section is
also a County road. There -are then three entities involved.
Each City has its own concerns in addition to the general
declining nature of the roadway. A severe sight distance
problem exists at the Maplewood Junior High School. With
a regrading and reconstruction safety could be significantly
improved at this location.
Another Maplewood concern is the unimproved section of
Holloway between Beebe Road and Furness Street. Recently
another multi - family residential development was approved
in this area. Along with the other multi -unit buildings
in the area, a concern for local traffic .exists. Much of
the traffic generated by the higher density development- .must.
wind its way through the neighborhood before reaching a col-
a lector street. The Maplewood Transportation Plan describes
_ Holloway as a major collector. Construction of the road
from Furness to Beebe could relieve some of the local traffic.
3
I would like to have the City Council be aware that these
projects are being discussed. In addition, I would appreciate
any direction the Council could give as far as a position or
direction on the part of Maplewood.
Q-1 0.)
... .. .....
C ,� 7 UN T Y ROAD T D
A r—
TSONR22W
34
_/4
3
T29NR22W
km
I lk RADATZ
K Oti L
cr
ox CA
z
z z
w 4
W
2640 No
at
z z
AV F.
e% r%A s as
(7) N. MARY CT. L.
cn
P,�v -
E _LKN E
IL
REAM
EMAP LEV IE5W,-
LANE
MAPLE
(2.) CHI PPE WA C IRCLE
:3,) CHIPPEWA AVE.
NORTH ST. PAUL
1047,
NORTH ST PAUL
EDGEHIU_
RD. ul
z
_j
DEMONT u.
AV E.w
0
cr
39
11 AVE.
AV th
LJ INI
G
AVE,
2400N*
E36
E
AI
A E N AV E
r
LARK AVE.
OPE
AV
E.
z
64
z
_j
w
pq
>1
2160 N&
6KE //AVE.
r_lr
at
z z
AV F.
e% r%A s as
(7) N. MARY CT. L.
cn
P,�v -
E _LKN E
IL
REAM
EMAP LEV IE5W,-
LANE
MAPLE
(2.) CHI PPE WA C IRCLE
:3,) CHIPPEWA AVE.
NORTH ST. PAUL
1047,
NORTH ST PAUL
r
J
-g
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY MANAGER BARRX EVANS
FROM. CITY CLERK
REGARDING:. HIRING PERMANENT PART TIME EMPLOYEE
DATE: -- APRIL 1, 1981
I am -Xequesting the Council to authorize the hiring of a permanent part —time employee
to work in the Deputy Registrar area in the City Clerk's Department.
There has been a steady increase in volume of business that has transpired since the
opening of the deputy office in February of 1980 and the driver's license office as
of July 15, 1980.
Attached is a copy of the income derived from Motor Vehicle fees and Driver's License
fees.
The proposed salary for the permanent part —time position would be $5,730.00 plus an
additional cost of $670.00 for P.E.R.A. and F.I.C.A.
Authorization to transfer $6,400 from the Contingency Account to account 101 -116 -4020
is also requested.
i
_ 2
� :i
v
& - pa T yr Rest 7", *Z s ORC- ""CMJT
it I
�+3
.. .............
- M MT
/h /
.
fv/
Co/
2 ;. �.
._.........__....._..._... .. I y4..._._.._. Vi.•....µ ...._ - ....._..— _.._.__.. -. ..._ .._.....«......_._.._. _m «......._... «_.._............ _..—._.«..... ..__._. «- .._m_...m..» .......... ....._..__...._..._...._......_.— .._........._._................ ........
........_............
1
�s
i
..•. «.....j. .... .... .. , . ...,. ,.. ...._m•..... «.4._._
``
, '
£
�� .. ...... f
_....,j..._ ............. ........... ............
1
3 h ilt
/_........
£i
_. _..
I
m « _......
..ncw,.. .w..s.,.v �..,f�1•..., s w.. w. �• �A�.+•nwr..w..rrw.ww.•...w.w.wr ,, �i..•r..
i j,
1'
nnw..wwi..w�u«www+•«.4
fi
r.....•..�•�.w•..f w ... �... .y.
t 5
..w,v ��rw + .wfa.sw. �•..wk,... .. ... ..,,�•
)
7
6
,
. {
I
to
..
_ __.._�_._ ._._. . _ j...._...._._.._.._...«_____..__..« .............._._._ ___________..__.__.___......... .___........._.__ __ «_m....... »,..,_..,.._.____m_
;+s .......— ........m.w
8;
_....._ «.«.._..
..t... _
y...._...._..,..........., .. .# ....._ _ ..... __. «..;.. » -....
309
sI
..x.. ...._..._ .........
............ _ _ . o2,
YawrY MV�M..W�
..vvy....nrr.�rii. ur �ow/Ypj..ww.�IGM1'
.'hsi' �Nninr .a•!..rnM4Wlwvw.✓w� 4Y..�.�..wy .:x.t.
b t.. _c -f
S
...._... f . Yoh ... _« 1
! 1
_ .. ... « _ __... _ .._
a � S
_ _ ..._.. «...... . _ ........... .
12 rD �
------- - - ---- - ------
1 13 ;.
i .._...
5 .
. // / � Jy 1........_.. ._..._..__....._ _....._.._.__......_ ti........._... m.._»....._..._. ..............._.m............. ....._« _._._......_.
14 s J . .. �' ....
..... .,_..._....._....i......m...s..
Sf
t
._ .... .... .» ... ..........._. _...._. .. _..
1�
`�
.., _._. _.. ....._... «._ _..... ....e s
.IY. MM.NN.•IbMM•.AaWM1v .AV �tY...M'✓µ�h.s
is _ ___ _ �_. _ ___ __.._ » m_
•;.
_ ..
�r�� �' �•�
_...•. __.
��
_...._.
7,81 . P.
__ _.._ .................... .. «..._ •— _.,...._...� t ..... _ ............ _.._.._....:....._.» _ .— . «_....... _...._.__...._. ._... _.._.._. ,__.... . _ ... ___.m
17 . .........
f
i
18°
£
19
I
20
21
1 '
22
�
l
1 �•
i
i33
23
» ..... .............. ....L... _«......__.........._. _..._...»..._..._......._...... _...._._ _.._. - - - _- ..- ._ — _.._. ...._. ....__............_._+.... —..__
.._
)..._..
._.- ..}...
+•.�•_.
i
.�
-_.� —_ _
_... ... _
24 } 1 S
!!!•
£
£ _
£
,
s
. tea..
.-.�_ __
25 £ f!
£ 1
1
26
� {
�J
2
£;
29
30
t
! t
{£
31
1+
�.._ '_,
35
1
'
36
!
'
1 }
f
� .. _ .. - .. .. :.T ....- r_a...�•�, - �r; r:.' rl. u. � "r.•'•.`r'.4+A^"K'�""•2.'E`r'1R •a.�.:;'a«rr•K••.�....
. '.'."SST? P
..
7.� ^i.
... . xl+•''/1SY4?
.r
re'!•.ee ..,r'
s
1 �...
' . ..
. ,_
... - ...
.. ...
... �.. . .
c. ...
To- 9
Apri 1 13, 1981
STAFF REPORT
To: City Manager Barry Evans
From: Director of Public Safety R. W. Schaller
Subject: East Metropolitan Emergency Medical Services Communication System
Proposal: It is proposed that the City Council support the concept of an
East etropol i tan Emergency Medical Services (EMS) communication system and
authorize our participation in it through the allocation of $85,000 needed
to purchase the necessary mobile radio equipment.
Backgroun In 1977, the Minnesota Health Department allocated $362,000 for
development of an EMS radio communications system for Dakota, Ramsey and
Washington Counties. The radio design, the proposed costs and a method for
managing and financing such a system was developed by the Communications
Subcommittee of the Metropolitan Council's Emergency Medical Services
Advisory Committee with the help of a technical consultant, Ward Montgomery.
The Subcommittee is composed of representatives of Dakota, Ramsey and Wash-
ington County Public Safety and Community Health Services agencies, representa-
tives of the West Metro EMS communications system, members of the Council's
EMS Advisory Committee and others. Lieutenant Cusick is a member of this
Subcommittee representing our Paramedic . Program.
The Communications Subcommittee worked to design a radio system that would
adequately meet the resent and future needs of the East Metro area and
q y p
could be implemented at a cost of $362,000 or less. After, reviewing a number
of system design alternatives, the Subcommittee agreed upon a system with an
estimated initial cost of $466,110. The system design selected by the Sub-
committee was chosen because it is the minimum design that will best support
present and future EMS operations.
A joint powers agreement among Dakota, Ramsey and Washington Counties is
needed to develop and operate an East Metro EMS communication system. The
Metropolitan Council will seek an-agreement from the County governments,
hospitals and ambulance services by May 1 5 , 1981, that they w i l l participate
in the system. A copy of our letter of intent to participate is attached
for your review. Once such an agreement is reached, a County joint powers
agreement can be established, equipment specifications developed and a contract
awarded for delivery and installation of the system. It is anticipated that
the system, if approved by the parties concerned, w i l l be installed by June 1,
1982, and fully operational by August 1, 1982.
The original 9 rant of $362,000 from the Minnesota Health Department included
monies to fund a 50/ match for the purchase of the mobile equipment needed
b y paramedic aramedi c service providers. Because of inflation, the cost of this
o
proposed system has eliminated the 50/ matching portion of the grant, leaving
the P roviders with the full purchase of mobile equipment, which is anticipated
to be approximately $15,000 per vehicle. Anticipating our need to purchase
50/ of our mobile radio equipment for this system, we have been budgeting
monies every year to cover these costs, however, the amount was based on the
2
50/ matching funds. We currently have approximately $35,000 accrued for
this expenditure and will have to budget the remainder in our 1982 requests.
There is a possibility that additional matching funds w i l l be available for
mobile equipment, however, this will not be confirmed until July 1981.
Once implemented, this system wil-T make all existing EMS radio systems such
as ours inaccessible to St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center.
Recommendation: It is recommended that the Council support the concept of an
E ast Metropolitan Emergency Medical Services communication system, understanding
the possible costs to the City for implementation.
RWS: J 's
�
cc Lieutenant Cusick
Finance Director
EMS F i l e
Budget File
CI1'1' ()r
1380 FROST AVENUE MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109
61 2- 770 -4530 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY-- OFFICE'OF CHIEF OF POLICE
Apri 1 13, 1981
Ms. Martha Yucel
Chairperson
Emergency Medical Services Advisory Committee
300' Metro Square Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Dear Ms. Yucel:
The City of Maplewood, in concept, supports the proposed East Metropolitan
Emergency Medical Services communication system, and it is planned that
our Paramedic Program will participate in its operation, providing all
funding assistance from the Minnesota Health Department remains at its
original $362,000 level,
The City of Maplewood is very concerned with the elimination of the 50%
matching funds for the required mobile radio equipment needed by the providers
to participate in this proposed system. It is our opinion that all avenues _
of additional funding should be aggressively pursued by the Health Department,
along with a re- evaluation of their funding allocation pr'i on ti es to ensure
the maximum support of this project.
Very truly yours,
R. W. Schaller, Chief of Police
Maplewood Police Department
RWS j s
cc Lieutenant Cusick
CIT Or
MA
1380 FROST AVENUE MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109
612-770-4530 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY—OFFICE CHIEF OF POLICE
April 13, 1981
Mr. Raymond G. Cink
Director
Ramsey County Public Health Department
P ent
150 E. Kello gg Boulevard, Suite 906
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Dear Mr. Cink:
The City of Maplewood, in conce t �
Emergency Medical p � • uPPorts the proposed East Metro of i tan
9 y l ServI ces commun sy stem, P
Program will Y � and i t � s planned that
our Paramedic Pro
9 11 parti ci pate i n its operation, on providing
funding assistance from the Minn P � P ova di ng all
original $362,000 Minne Health Department remains at i
level.
.
The City of Maplewood is very concerned •
f ,y r mobil radio ned with the elimination of the 50/
matching • funds for the required mobs .
to party c� pate i n this proposed os d is needed by the prove ders
P P e system, It 1 s our. opinion that all avenues
additional funding should be aggressive)
of
along with a re- evaluati y pursued by the Health Department,
on of their funding allocation priori on ti
`he maximum support of this project.
P es to ensure
P J
Very truly yours,
RWS:JS
R. W. Schaller, Chief of Pol ice
)1 ewood Police Department
cc L i eute