Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988 03-14 City Council PacketAGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, March 14, 1988 Municipal Administration Building Meeting 88 - 5 (A) CALL TO ORDER (B) ROLL CALL (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES (D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA (EA) APPOINTMENTS 1. Community Design Review Board (E) CONSENT AGENDA 1. Accounts Payable 2. Designation of Official Depository and Financial Services Agreement 3. HRA Reappointment 4. Return of Funds to PAC Commercial Account 5. Budget Transfer: Council Audio System 6. District No. 6 Water Project - Final Payment 7. Budget Transfer - Promotional Pins F PU BLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M., 1764 E. County Road B (Svendsen) a. Variance b. Rezoning (4 Votes) 2. 7:10 P.M., Conditional Use Permit: Castle Ave 3. 7:20 P.M., Hennen Hillwood Court Addition a. Preliminary Plat b. Street Vacation c. Rezoning (4 Votes) (G) AWARD OF BIDS 1. Cope Avenue Water Tank - Repainting (H) UNFINISHED BUSINE (I) NEW BUSINESS 1. CDRB Appeal: Office Shores - Beam Avenue 2. I -494 Interchange 3. Suburban Community Channels /Equipment (Leer, Inc. 4. St. Paul Water Board a. Proposed Legislation b. Appoint Council Representative to Water Board 5. Discuss Developers Meeting 6. Century Avenue - Carver Avenue - Street Sign 7. Present Feasibility Report and Schedule Public Hearing - City Project 87 -20 & 87 -29, Ferndale and Geranium 8. Present Feasibility Report and Schedule Public Hearing - City Project 87 -19, Boxwood 9. Present Feasibility Report and Schedule Public Hearing - City Project 87 -21, Ski Jump 10. Resolution Transferring MSA Funds to County Road C, East of White Bear Avenue 11. Resolution Restricting Parking Along Proposed Sterling Street from Highwood, Avenue to Hillwood Street 12. Beam Avenue - New Bus Route 13. City Hall - Final Payment 14. T.H. 120 - Signals Agreement (J) VISITOR PRESENTATIONS (K) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. I 9. 10. (L) ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS (M) ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, February 22, 1988 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 88 - 4 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:05 P.M., by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Meeting No. 87 - 23 (October 26, 1987) Councilmember Bastian moved Seconded by Councilmember Juker 2. Meeting - November 5, 1987 ff. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Juker. Councilmember Rossbach abstained. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Minutes of November 5, 1987, as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Juker. Councilmember Rossbach abstained. 3. Meeting No. 87 - 24 (November 9, 1987) Councilmember Bastian Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Juker and Bastian. Councilmember Rossbach abstained. 4. Meeting No. 87 - 26 (November 23, 1987) Mavor Greavu as No. 87 - 2/22 Seconded by Councilmember Bastian 5. Meeting No. 88 - 3 (February 8, 1988) Councilmember Juker Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Juker and Bastian. Councilmember Rossbach abstained. Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian, Juker and Rossbach. Mayor Greavu abstained. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. Merger 2. 3 -M Company 3. Goals 4. Manager's Meeting 5. Remove Item I -2 6. Add Item I -7, Public Imp 7. Water Board Meeting Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. E. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Bastian 1. Accounts Payable Project Funds Ayes - all. ded by Mavor Greavu. Aves - Approved the accounts (Part I, Fees,Services, Expenses, check register dated February 16, 1988 - $589,326.03 - Part II, Payroll pay period ending 1- 29 -88, gross amount of $147,189.82) as submitted. 2. Carryover of 1987 Appropriations Approved the following carryover of 1987 appropriations to 1988: Department Amount Account Code For City Council: $ 870 01- 4120 -01 Recognition pins, plaques, etc. 1,735 01- 4630 -01 Chairs and tables for Council Chambers. Police Civil 100 01- 4120 -05 Testing supplies (see Exhibit A) Service Commission: 1,530 01- 4480 -05 Testing fees (see Exhibit A) Emergency Services 300 01- 4430 -12 Moving warning siren from the St. Paul Pistol Range (see Exhibit B) - 2 - 2/22 t' Miscellaneous: 3,200 01- 4490 -19 Data processing consultant to provide assistance implementing new computer system 21,120 13- 4630 -00 Remaining costs for new computer system City Clerk: 3,000 01- 4120 -34 Election supplies 600 01- 4640 -34 Telephone for the deaf Public Safety: 1,600 01- 4630 -41 Filing cabinets 6,500 01- 4150 -42 Semi - automatic weapons (see Exhibit C) 4,500 01- 4640 -42 Semi - automatic weapons 400 01- 4600 -43 Paramedic program equipment - $400 is the amount of private donations received for this purpose. Community Development: 1,670 01- 4810 -72 Consultant to study why Maplewood's property taxes are high despite the good tax base. $47,125 3. Budget Transfer Approved a budget transfer of $2,100 from the General Fund Contingency account to Finance Department office supplies budget. 4. Request to Fill Vacancy - Park Maintenance I Approved the posting, advertising and hiring of a Park Maintenance Person I for the Parks and Recreation Department. 5. Acceptance of Developer Project 84 -01. RESOLUTION NO. 88 - 2 - 17 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, has heretofore entered into a contract for public improvements for City Project 84 -01 described as Granada Addition, and WHEREAS, said project has been certified as completed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the project is completed and the utilities are hereby accepted as part of the distribution systems. - 3 - 2/22 6. Beam Avenue Water Main, Project 84 -12, Change Order Four Resolution No. 88 - 2 18 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 84 -12 and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 84 -12 Change Order Four. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order Four. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M., Maplewood Highlands - a. Plan Amendment (4 Votes) b. Street Vacation C. Preliminary Plat d. Zone Change e. Feasibility Report 1. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the development of Maplewood Highlands Addition located south of Pleasantview Park. 2. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. 3. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. 4. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the Planning Commission recommendation. 5. Mr. Bob Bruton, Partner in the development, spoke on behalf of the proposal. 6. Larry Olson and Rod Halverson, Midwest Land Surveyors, explained the project. 7. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following expressed their views: James Miller, 2413 Carver Avenue 8. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. 9. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: - 4 - 2/22 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan to amend the major street plan element to designate a minor collector street corridor runing east /west south of Pleasant View Park between Sterling Street and future Lakewood Drive. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 1, 1988, to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was pub- lished and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said plan amendment be approved. 2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on February 22, 1988. The Council considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described plan amendment be approved on the basis that designation of a minor collector street along this corridor is desirable to ensure that the street within this corridor is designed to safely accommodate the future traffic circulation needs in this area. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Juker and Rossbach Nay - Councilmember Bastian. 10. Mayor Gravu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: WHEREAS, Maplewood Highlands Development Corporation initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following- described property: Sterling Street, lying east of the South 825 feet of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, except that part lying south of the following- described line: (Required to be furnished by the Developers). WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. A majority of the owners of property abutting said street vacation have signed a petition for this vacation; 2. This vacation was reviewed by the Planning Commission on February 1, 1988. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that this vacation be approved. - 5 - 2/22 3. The City Council held a public hearing on February 22, 1988 to consider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered re- ports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above - described street right -of -way, public interest in the property will accrue to the following- described abutting proper- ties: 1. The south 825 feet of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 13, Township 28, Range 22. 2. Except the North 806 feet of the North 1741 feet of the W 1/2 of the SE 1/4, lying easterly of the center line of Sterling Street and North- westerly of I -494, subject to roads and easements in Section 13, Town- ship 28, Range 22. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood City Council that it is in the public interest to grant the above - described vacation on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. Construction of street at a safe grade across the steep slope in this area would be cost - prohibitive. 2. The properties that abut this right -of -way can be accessed from other improved streets. This vacation is subject to the retention of: 1. (Trail easement legal description) 2. (Water main easement legal description) Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. 11. Councilmember Anderson moved to _approve a. Construction contracts having been signed for a stormwater improvement project, based on the ski -jump property stormwater feasibility study. The City Council may waive this requirement if the feasibility study shows that the additional volume of water from this'plat will not have an adverse effect on the ski - jump property. b. The plat shall be revised, as necessary, to conform with the approved location for Sterling Street, based on a feasibility study to determine the location. c. Construction of Lake Drive (Gonyea's Oak Heights plat) having been guaranteed to the west property line of this site. d. Show a 120- foot - diameter cul -de -sac bulb at the end of Crestview Drive. The location must be approved by the City Engineer. - 6 - 2/22 e. The plat shall be revised as necessary to show a "pedestrian way" at least ten feet wide in the vicinity of the east property line for a trail access to Pleasant View Park. The trail may have to be located outside of the Sterling Street right -of -way to de- sign a safe trail grade due to the steep slope. The City shall de- sign this trail and decide whether it can be cost - effectively con- structed. If it is to be constructed, the applicant is to construct it to City standards and be reimbursed his costs from PAC funds. The amount of reimbursement shall be agreed to when the developer's agreement is signed. f. The location of each of the Williams Brothers pipelines within 100 feet of the site shall be located by land survey (including depth below grade). A confinement easement shall be obtained from Williams Brothers, and it shall be shown on the plat. g. The cul -de -sac bulbs for proposed Mary and Snowshoe Courts shall be shifted to be symmetrical or, if to be asymmetrical, the rights -of -way shall be modified so that the curb radius between the bulb and the return is not less than SO feet. h. The north line of Lot 9, Block One, shall be revised to be perpendicular to the Crestview Drive right -of -way. i. The streets shall be renamed as follows: (1) "Mary Court" to "Mary Place" (2) "Bartelmy Court" to "Marnie Court" (3) "Crestview Drive" to "Crestview Court" (4) "Lakewood Drive" to "Schadt Drive" j. The two pine trees located near the east line of the site shall be accurately located. As far as practical, the proposed rights -of -way shall be located so as to protect these trees. The cedar /juniper trees in the southwest portion of the site shall also be located. If they could be lost during construction, they shall be relocated elsewhere on the site, if relocation could be success- ful. This determination shall be made by a forester or similar specialist. k. City Engineer approval of final grading, utility, erosion control and drainage plans. These plans shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Impervious surface area from Block Three shall be diverted to the street. (2) The lcoation and species of all trees four inches or more in diameter shall be shown on the grading plan. Those trees to be saved shall be designated on this plan and in the field. All of these trees to be lost shall be replaced, not to exceed ten trees per acre. - 7 - 2/22 (3) The drainage easement proposed in the northeast corner of the site shall be revised, if necessary, to conform with the storm water ponding plans approved for the ski -jump property (Condition A.). (4) These plans shall address the concerns raised by the Soil Conservation Service in their letter dated December 23, 1987. (5) Include a pipe from the on -site pond to the ski -jump pond. 1. Submission of a signed developer's agreement and required surety for all on -site public improvements, any tree relocation or replanting and construction of a trunk water main to the north. This agreement shall also: (1) State the specifications and cost reimbursements to the applicant for the construction of the trail (Condition F.) and the parking lot /cul -de -sac bulb (Condition M.2.) (2) Include construction of a 15t car parking lot on the park property at the end of Crestview Drive (Court). The City shall design the parking lot. The developer shall construct the parking lot and be reimbursed for his costs from PAC funds. The amount of reimbursement shall be agreed to in the developer's agreement. (3) Include a pipe and acquire an easement from the on -site pond to the ski -jump pond. m. Recordable deed restrictions to be recorded to run with the title of the affected parcels, shall be submitted to the City along with the appropriate recording fees to: (1) Require that all of the runoff from the roofs and driveways for the homes to be built on Lots 1 - 13, Block Three, to be diverted to Schadt Drive. The restriction shall also state that rain gutters and acceptable site grading and /or run -off retainage systems shall be employed and maintained for the life of each property, as required by the City Engineer. The City Engineer shall review the grading and sodding plans for each lot prior to the is- suance of a building permit. (2) Prohibit the construction of a dwelling within 100 feet of the Williams Brothers pipeline. (The lots that appear to be affected are Lots 19 - 21, Block Two and Lot 13, Block Three.) The developer shall also notify the purchasers of the pipeline location. o. Lakewood ( Schadt) Drive shall be designed as a minor collector street. - 8 - 2/22 p. Delete Outlot A in favor of the proposed drainage easement and extend the abutting lot lines through this area. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 12. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 88 -2 -21 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F, farm residence, to R -1, single dwelling for the following- described property: The south 825 feet of the southeast 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of Section 13, Township 28, Range 22. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commis- sion on February 1, 1988. The Planning Commission recom- mended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on February 22, 1988, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was pub- lished and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present writ- ten statements. The Council also considered reports and recom- mendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is ade- quately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveni- ences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. - 9 - 2/22 5. Rezoning to R -1, single dwelling, would eliminate the potential of any farm - related nuisance uses, such as the raising of livestock, occurring in this single - dwelling neighborhood. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 13. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 88 -2 -22 WHEREAS, it is proposed to establish right -of -way and construct Sterling Street with associated utilities from Carver Avenue north to the proposed Maplewood Highlands plat and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pur- suant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: That the proposed improvement be referred to the City Engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. 2 7:10 P.M., Code Amendment: Private Garages (2nd Reading - 4 Votes) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a proposed code amendment that would allow garages up to 1250 square feet on lots over one acre in size. b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Mayor Greavu introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: - 10 - 2/22 M ORDINANCE NO. 621 AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGULATING RESIDENTIAL GARAGES THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The definition of 'private garage' in Section 36 -6 is amended as follows: Private garage: A private garage is an accessory building designed or used for the shelter or storage of motor vehicles. Section 2. Section 36 -77 is added as follows: Sec. 36 -77. Private garages. (a) Private garages are limited to one attached and one detached garage for each lot. (b) Each private garage shall not exceed 1,000 square feet of floor area on a lot under one acre and 1,250 square feet on a lot of one acre or more. (c) A private garage shall not exceed one story in height as viewed from the street. Detached garages shall not include living space. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Council on February 22, 1988. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. G. AWARD O BIDS None. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Variance - Steingraber - 2648 Minnehaha a. Manager McGuire stated that since the Council approved second reading of the code amendment to allow private garages to be 1250 square feet on a lot of one acre or more, Mr. Steingraber does not need a variance. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to deny the request of Mr. Steinbraber for a variance to construct a 1250 square foot garage. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 2. Dege Garden Center a. Conditional Use Permit Renewal b. Initiation of Plan Amendment and Zone changes - 11 - 2/22 1. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. 2. Director of community Development Olson presented the specifics of the request. 3. John Daubney, attorney representing Mr. George Dege, and Mr. Dege spoke on behalf of the proposal. 4. The following area residents expressed their views regarding the Dege Garden Center: Irving Dreher, 814 Mayhill Road Duane Golaski, 804 Mayhill Road Don Gschlecht, 825 Mayhill Road Scott Everson, 2713 Seventh Street Letter From Mr. and Mrs. Crooks, 2695 E. Seventh St. Scott Gilbert, 817 Mayhill Road Edward Collins, 2687 E. Seventh Street John Strauch, 2707 E. Seventh Street Stan Dege, Brother of George Dege. 5. Mayor Greavu to delete the an Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Joker and Rossbach Nay - Councilmember Bastian. 6. Councilmember Anderson commerc screen Seconded by Councilmember Juker to BC for the ew Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson and Juker Nays - Councilmembers Bastian and Rossbach 3. Frost Avenue Striping a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider explained the Frost Avenue Striping. c. No action taken. NEW BUSINESS 1. Expanded Hours Compost Site a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. - 12 - 2/22 b. Councilmember Juker moved to e two Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 2. Bus Route Addition Deleted from Agenda 3. Highway 120 Agreement a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. 1 r b. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Mn. DOT agreement to cover the City cost for the Highway 120 improvements and authorize funding the project from the state aid street construction account. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 4. County Road C - Approval of Preliminary Plat - Project 86 -25 a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 88 -2 -23 WHEREAS, Ramsey County has prepared plans for reconstruction of County Road C within Maplewood from White Bear Avenue to Ariel Street. WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reviewed such plans and presents said plans to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: The preliminary plans for reconstruction of County Road C from White Bear Avenue to McKnight Road, SAP 62- 623 -30, City Project 86 -25, are approved. This approval is independent of proposed cooperative agreements for the construction of this project. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson and Rossbach Nays - Councilmembers Bastian and Juker. 5. Representation - Regional Transit Board a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. - 13 - 2/22 0 b. Mayor Greavu moved to appoint Charlotte Wasiluk to the Regional Transit Board Advisory Committee. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 6. Cave's Junek Park Addition Final Plat a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve Cave's Junek Park Addition final plat and to waive Condition 9. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Bastian, Juker and Rossbach Nay - Councilmember Anderson. 7. Public Improvement Project Fund a. Mayor Greavu moved to establish budgets for the following feasibilitity studies: PROJ. NO. FUND TITLE BUDGET 84 -14 Walter Street $ 12,000.00 85 -08 Edgerton & Roselawn Storm Sewer 40,000.00 86 -01 Condor Storm Sewer 5,000.00 86 -07 Upper Afton Road - McKnight to Century 30,000.00 86 -25 County Road C, White Bear to McKnight 12,000.00 86 -27 Larpenteur Avenue - 35E to Desoto 3,000.00 87 -04 McKnight Rd. Phase II Larpenteur to 36 10,000.00 87 -05 McKnight Rd. Phase III Beaver Lake to Conway 15,000.00 87 -13 Meyer Street Water 5,000.00 87 -14 Holloway Avenue - Beebe Rd. to Furness 5,000.00 87 -19 Boxwood Avenue - McKnight to Dorland 6,300.00 87 -20 Ferndale Street Storm Sewer 5,550.00 87 -21 Ski Jump Property Storm Sewer 10,000.00 87 -31 Harvester Avenue Storm Sewer 4,100.00 87 -32 Footprint Lake Storm Sewer 15,000.00 87 -44 Highway 61 Watermain at Kohlman 6,000.00 87 -45 Sterling St. & Schaller Dr. Imp. 3,700.00 Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. J. VISITOR PRESENTATION None. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Merger Councilmember Bastian deleted this item. — 14 — 2/22 0 e 2. 3 -M Company a. Councilmember Anderson stated he had received a letter from 3 -M Company enlisting help in reducing their taxes. b. No action taken. 3. Goals a. Councilmember Anderson suggested the Council start setting goals. 4. Manager's Meeting a. Councilmember Juker stated Council should establish a date to meet with the Manager. b. No action taken. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATION 1. St. Paul Water Board a. Manager McGuire stated there is a meeting Tuesday, February 23, 1988, at the State Office Building, Room 306, to discuss suburban representation on the St. Paul Water Board. M. ADJOURNMENT. 10:31 P.M. City Clerk - 15 - 2/22 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT DATE: City Manager Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner Interview -- Community Design Review Board March 4, 1988 SUMMARY Introduction ..... . ..... .... 574 Action by Counoilel Endorsed ® Modifie HeJecte - Date On Tuesday, March 1, 1988, the community design review board recommended that Mr. Del Aziz be appointed to serve on the board. Mr. Aziz's application is attached. There are currently two vacancies due to the expired terms of board members Peterson and Marlow. .l 1 Attachment: Application for Del Aziz NAPLEMOOD BOARDS & COMMISSIONS (n� APPLICATION PM 7 IRS J F!- A Date / t - /D - Sr ADDRESS q�� s� P r�J v1LS S'F�, N . Phones Rome k, 2 I - Ltf y York .- gT Z C 9.5 87 AGE MMOWMI YES Number of Years as a Homeowner / I . P1u r.n RO Number of Years as a Resident A " Mould regular attendance at meetings be difficults Yes No AIO Oa which board or commission are you interested in serving on? List 6 number I being first choice. S COMMUNITY DESIGN REVMV.MARD PARK 6 RECREATION COMMISSION 2 _ HOUSING A REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PLANNING COMMISSION HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION If .this is a Renewal Application, total number of meetings held on your board or commission this past year? — Now many have you missed? Education ' "entO and Employer - Vumber 'of !ears New Applicants only# Previous job experience and employers. ( list last three). et List Organizations or Clubs in the Community in which you have been, or are an active participant. P^"A�� Background experience in any of the Boards or Commissions If any. rg��� e-11flAe <-�t \ < 4 _ Why would you like to serve on any of these boards or commissions? ;_ �/L Additional Comments. • • • W 0 • • • • • • • 0 0 • • • i • • 1 � I rp O U .0 O I f W Q) ri U Q' Ca s w N q h w.. W K s w a Y U J W J 2 Q V so W LL S D s i 7 a C!1 Qi QI Cn H p O U L U p 0 n] O 4 ___ __ pp3p X " " „p °p RappA 33pR a 3: p; 333:9p 3:. p „ „3 " " „RC. 333: :823: 8 R S l6 p pR P c O N v In 0 r c O O M O h O N F w c O M 1 N N w M c O 0 N O O N N N In In P v O c O v O t7 N O O w v •0 ti O N u M t` v N OF M N N •ri N H U 0 b O 4 Gl w A P o N c oc o w 0 a In v o M c o o u N c o c o< ti < O no 1- c U ti r oc O M N N a O O c O N 0 N c O c P c N O P M Z 0 0 N t O w w In In P a In P I 1I] K O P v O M 0 O w NP `0 q P O If M 0 v M P I� g I- P N N N i •+ N N t •• In In N W W u W N N LL Z Z J U J > m a Q z Q W Z I 2 J W J W IL J W 0: W ¢ K J Q £ z w w w w U U a w w > u 1- w 0 1- w a O U _IX J N J •+ W U 1- Z F- Z U •+ Z 0.t Q 4] J IYr S LL W 4 H W 2 <1 2 W -M F Q <1- ¢ J Q W 2 Z > E Z 0 mu W c O >G a_ s > > >- > > o .. s > sw Q U 4 0.l a w v N u W W 4 a W a W u W W N d Z d 0_ I I Z J N V E LL U I I W N I U u Z W W C O Z V Z N c .+ 2 01 a U N u N N c O a m ¢ 0 J 0 <U N J X M W 2 a J I-C Z h W W W 1- a 0 Z 2 zu W ow q • 4 Z ¢ Z 2 q u LL W r K S W S LL q U x J = = J J J H f 1- J 1- J • W O 0 O a d N J u N Z 6. J z a J N LL F w O L uu 0 U L 6 2 a 1- Q u W 0_ Q iL Q W S • W uu £ U L > > u > m g u W Q W a W a 4 W W= J LLILU a u N a 0 v N u w E a 2 zu N S WO W U If W Z V > N N > w W a FX a N Y W w I i. Y N N ovi ¢ Z J OG O J ¢ ¢ Y > N a L S > W K a W a E J W S J u a Q d a w s u z a a x a Z F w O N O 3 a O Q d n. �. W 0 w H 0 Q E m U E a v f W N O W E H N W ¢ p: O E ¢ LL N J Z z 0 O a Z Q N Q w N F-. S Z 0 O W K K 2 J. Z d Z O J 0 W u 4 W L a Q O Y O O 3 O 3 3 > U z U K a s N N W W ❑ O c 2 Z 1- W W Y J J Q. 4 ¢ < 1- w U q d d 3 Z > w W a F Q Q 6 4 O Q I q i g p Q W w J £ g E J £ 4 4 a Q 61 W D] ¢ O O O O O c O- 0 c w c O O c c 0 c O O W W, O O O O O c In N c 1 c O O c c O c O. O 0 P I- v - M N P N P £ O O O O _ O O - O w 0 - - 0 O • 0 N M �0 1- ti z In 0 v In w O O c c r C O O c O c 0.. O s w m ❑ P LLl 1� P O •-• N d O N M z 0 o v P o v v m 1 14 in m In u] N �D. N .0 •0 N N �0 U W S U .. .. .. ,. . _________ a 9- I] 3 p 2 � IF 51 2 : a a 3 C 3 P a 9 a e M a 3 1 2 9 3 3 2 : a 2 3 2 R P - - - - - � � . w w w w w w w w - N W 0 U' a a W rM pL�p � � O 3 W iC W � W J 1 d Y U J E W J 2 V O 1 a' (C �J Y W LL F- S N V U � c I M ` M C r L O m � - w M C K O U W 0 4 > p - ______ _ pgAFARFA:. RAAARPARFR :9n ^RAFR:,RRAAAAARRtl82yAAASC F "nRR O O c r O c O P N H Z O O P P M d P I[1 O c N O c O W w O In c O d P d a N c .+ O c N c a N N £ 0 CO d 1 r a N w d P M N N O a O O a .• L d u M 0 c ti O c P 00C n c r O c O c N H c Z O c O P M c M a d P c In O c d r r P N O c O 0 a O L a N N M d r a 00 LLY ICI .ar q J 4 z Z J W W 4 O u W u J M £ wu wwu W F Z ~ V ~ U N Q W O W . N r . rU+ r K J W p m d r I W U I LL LL LL J M Q r a a c O c } W a O c 00C O a d Y LL 2 �+ LG w LL d I i I 1 M O Z u u d 0 q LL w V u N I I I I I I v m w d O ? W £ 2 W u W u W S q W a W W W W c £ £ 1- u W W 6. tL a o a a a m a a a as a o o a a I- W [C ] p 0 p fC [C U 0 J � 2 IL UI N M 6 p N M M N u N u 6 d q N M z M 7 £ ^ Z 0 r W W _ F LL 4 U N H Z 2 O r W Z _ 3 J J U £ M I U' q W N £ W 2 Z O W K 0 W Z p J L N W O T W O Y d O } } ,F U Z .Ji U Q 4 d [L w x W c W Y N 2 J O O N q W x J p w O ICI O O O O O O O 0 O O O O c O O w r o 0 0 0 0. o o 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 O O O N N N a V 0 O O 0 O z W O O N M a a' a a a a ICI 4 N M Z c O O .-r - •• w N N w W W O d r M 0 W P O N M Z N 0 W v d d d d d d d d r r r d d d •0 � d d d d d d d d d .p Y W t - 7 - 4 . y 9 4 8 2 R G-2-9-3-2 R ^n U, W O 4 a m W F- N 1 own V 0-0 O [0 3 W ¢ W � W J a m U J SWJ 2 Q LL V O � K W O T W LL F x .. U U � t c L 0 C V W � r � 0 0 c 'W M C K O UW OH O ¢ >q „:ip „Ap A RBR:,aP %PAaA RSBtl "rri.era d °a Rn PPd O %aW R8 "r 8Bd0d688 RnPF %FX M O N O 0 O O N O V 0 O O M �0 Z m O Y O O O M P r 10 O r W W m N O O O0 O 4 M W O N O M Y 0 V d' r b a�. O P E 10 M . N W ¢ moc m O c 00 O 4 O N O 0 O O 4 0 < c O O c 0 no 00 �m Z N N C V .+ m 10 O a vo V O c O O c M P r m c 0 -0 ��O WP 00 00 OM W V N O O O M M c O N O mm 0 W4 p Onc PWa O.. NI 0 Y 0 Y O� £ .+ .p N .+ W .. .+ .. N N N Q J 4 N W M W M Q u z r- r f- � w a Wu x z F i- W w u WW O 0 wmu m N u N J W 1 U L z z Z W O 2 z OUL U U coa 00 a Om U F w F W W a a o z W 1- C 00 U V Q< .. 2 > q 2 m q .. r. .. .. r. q >> >> Ma = O LL 2 Z Q XK a K x COW tom W¢ LL Wu N W W W c a LL Q K u W WWu WW m z Z Z Z Z d O x mu I W LL u W O f- W 00 N W m m .a .. 1 I I 1 .+ z z m F F- H ti F m m K O J J J W m u m of J .-. - �¢ a K¢ W Q¢ ¢ Q Q f W Oc u W W u W X= 00a 00 q LQULUU OZ a Wu 2 a x 2 .. r J 2 mw LL LL 4 W W f wwy mw as aa. aW n. a Wu Q ¢ a ¢ a a a a Q ¢ mm Ww 4 WW » 0 > U O u W u £ W u W W O O O K u W » W W u W W Doc M q q¢ m a LL U N 2 a x x u m m 0 m F I 2 d d LL LL u LL LL O m V 0 0 T m U d J d > w W m K 0 m N U p W Q - i 0 U Z 0 W K J U Q z W z 4 O m m Z Q J W m - N O J m E W . x U ¢ z m E x W Z m LL W W r Q m F- ¢ a z E q Z O > F .>. E w N C K V, m J ¢ m 2 f- W q z x u E m W 3 m K c N W = O > E 0 m Z m Z Q .-I W -) Z 0 q z Z M Z W Z W [0 t0 2 2 x � Y N J J E Of c O 0 O O O c 0. O c O O c O m c O O O W c Itl c O 10 O c O. O c 10 O c O r c O O 'O m 0• r M .+ r W r m N d r E .�-i O -+ O c O .. c O O c O O c -+ O p M O 'O N v Y =. a W to P O 10 r O z N M 'M '. m M: M. V '. M M -S0 4 v Y < N: W W m E z b W P O N.` M 10' 10 W N N M Z r r r W W W a - W W a W W a P P P U W x U W eJ 4 1 W r N M W Q 0-0 00- mW . W K W J 1 Q U J E W J 2 4 LL U ¢ O >WLL r 2 ti U U � O > I � o O C w M c s o - x U W �r 74 > A _ ___ A8 " „1aC.R, ",AxppR RR RRa 8'88988889 A ARARRR " „8: 888:88RCk,^, ° A'R O O D O O c O O O M O O N O r 2 c 0 0 M O O c O ' 2 c O N 1n M O O h O h 1Il O P N a a a N ti O O c 0 00 O c O O c 00 .Om O coocooco Er N O c O r c Z O .O c M 00 O c O P c 00 M” O coocooco O n c c O 0 O N If] N O O c O d O P In LL) I[1 LL) N If y' O. N c NCO M N h IC Ill q O Z r W W W r r N N 2 W W W W W U D Z U U U Z Z w W N F a W 0 — 2 1 .-. «. W I W > •+ >> Q Z JJ m 2zz zzzz LL H w 2 w r 11 E -- p w w a o w w u w a 11 w a¢ aQ a LL N - W ow LL u w E >> 00 E ££ £ S E i Z w O W 00 Q 2 LL .. LL LL S LL S 6 Q Q U) N x w O 2 S O 2 J O1 1 NN J J¢ U•cJ JJ ti 4 W 1 W w ¢ Q' 1 N ¢Q ¢a Q J 1W. u W W W a m W W W u W W uwwuwwuw W u W K U W O W W O U N � N 1 LL E W W r M Z F LL r = J O 1 N Q U N W J W W Z S J m w Z U J 3 4 N Q ¢ CC z z r r w w a J ' r Z r N W N 6 N W Z W U W a Z Z N J r Z Z W £ O O O E £ E £ E S E £ £ Z z Z Z 2 2 K c W O O. O O O O c O'. 'N O O O O 0 c 0 c O O -0 O O m O O O. Ill ' O O M N CO M d .Ni Z Ill ill N Ill Yl I[l N Yl IC1 Ifl d' .p d d. W oY ic m N Z Q P P. P P P. O c O O O O O a c p Y .. W x U Q Fy p F PIt7C IO CO Q O NOO O. MW ICi@C N O O P P M M M M LL) O 0 0 nom MP N F M V W O P N F .+ V) M Z 0 9 E U Q W Z rc > > O Q O F a £ W W d a ¢ I- r M � m � NPn £ z LL w � MMC O u O 41 p I[ w m £ d Q Fy p F PIt7C IO CO Q O NOO O. MW ICi@C N O O P P M M M M LL) O 0 0 nom MP N F M V W O P N F .+ V) M 0 O 0 O p II1 p O V O q O O 10 C 0 O M O N 4 z Z Z Z u Z 4 ¢ [C K f I f oY o5 J J W W > > ¢ 6 G< K H F m W q Z � K ¢ W 9 to a q J O O 2 3 O 2 N F W � r O � z z 0 0 a w N c O �O F » u� F M ILl F 0 0 ow 0— � J ¢ (J 2 q . a W LC LL F- J pY W J 4 ¢ W [C 2 !- 4 E J a i Z v L n 0 n J p F R O O 47 F O P O O 4] r O n f O R U7 [ a M O C o u O p O LLl M N W 1 J Z 0 9 E U Q W Z rc > > O > w F £ W W W d z ¢ I- w m m w £ LL LL w a O O u �r N w m c v �o W I- M = U W U 0 � w ° a w > q N q O O •+ O U UWWUWWL WWUWWU WWU WWUWWU W W M 2zzzzz2zz zz2zz2zz2zz2zz 3 W x wm W p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 o o 0 W K W w q J d d d d d d d d d d d d d d a d d 1 ' W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W a U J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J £ W J uwwwwwuwwuwwuwwuwwuwwuww X< I- li U U 0 0 O 0 O p II1 p O V O q O O 10 C 0 O M O N 4 z Z Z Z u Z 4 ¢ [C K f I f oY o5 J J W W > > ¢ 6 G< K H F m W q Z � K ¢ W 9 to a q J O O 2 3 O 2 N F W � r O � z z 0 0 a w N c O �O F » u� F M ILl F 0 0 ow 0— � J ¢ (J 2 q . a W LC LL F- J pY W J 4 ¢ W [C 2 !- 4 E J a i Z v L n 0 n J p F R O O 47 F O P O O 4] r O n f O R U7 [ a M O C o u O p O LLl M N W 1 J W 0 9 E U Q W Z rc > > W > w F £ W W W d z M w m m w £ LL LL r z O O u �r N w m c v �o W x = U W U 0 � w ° a w > r 0 O 0 O p II1 p O V O q O O 10 C 0 O M O N 4 z Z Z Z u Z 4 ¢ [C K f I f oY o5 J J W W > > ¢ 6 G< K H F m W q Z � K ¢ W 9 to a q J O O 2 3 O 2 N F W � r O � z z 0 0 a w N c O �O F » u� F M ILl F 0 0 ow 0— � J ¢ (J 2 q . a W LC LL F- J pY W J 4 ¢ W [C 2 !- 4 E J a i Z v L n 0 n J p F R O O 47 F O P O O 4] r O n f O R U7 [ a M O C o u O p O LLl M N W 1 J 0 9 E 0 U U W Q > > > > > s F ¢ W W W d M M r c O 1 O z u LL LL a O u m C N U u W a W Q a w R F 4 F 3 9 O P r u� N 0 0 o r 0 0o P aM + N F a w� O K I W W > W J1 ¢ J az > £ > t Z W W W Q WW WEE U mm W d Q O t W Z O mma W OLL N Q Z N a w W J W u Q m W O ¢ a E O LL M W r a U O N N Q o! > N W z > Z 3 W � O Z O W O U O Y E T W W Z m ¢ 0 0 0 0 0 V 0 F F r N M V N N F r 0 9 E 0 J Q O O U 2 u u F F O d O O � a a � w w r O 4 F 3 9 O P r u� N 0 0 o r 0 0o P aM + N F a w� O K I W W > W J1 ¢ J az > £ > t Z W W W Q WW WEE U mm W d Q O t W Z O mma W OLL N Q Z N a w W J W u Q m W O ¢ a E O LL M W r a U O N N Q o! > N W z > Z 3 W � O Z O W O U O Y E T W W Z m ¢ 0 0 0 0 0 V 0 F F r N M V N N F r w� O K I W W > W J1 ¢ J az > £ > t Z W W W Q WW WEE U mm W d Q O t W Z O mma W OLL N Q Z N a w W J W u Q m W O ¢ a E O LL M W r a U O N N Q o! > N W z > Z 3 W � O Z O W O U O Y E T W W Z m ¢ 0 0 0 0 0 V 0 F F r N M V N N F r • • f f • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • d w ¢ L a t 1 L 4 K W 1 r M l qU) O t O•+O Of0 ^+ 3 W K wsw J 4 4Y Q U J E W J 2 6 LL V 0\ LG CC O Y W LL rx U� O i T G 0 C 4 M M u h � o c KO L 2 UW � r O¢ >q __ _AaAAAAPAARAAAAARRAW$'. 99199:99AR9RXAXRRA9d ' d9d0d089AAAAAA 0 N O O P 0 c N r P O h N 0 O a P P a •0 O MD O C b O 7 P h Q P OD Y Q d M OICI .0 c M O avP 0 CNO O co hN •1 M 0 c N 1[1O Ind �•N MM r M Y a N M M N h M O 0 O .-i N.0 P P h 0 M V M 0 P P Z • . O 0 Y c 0 C 14 O M NM 10 V MN Q N < h W h0 NY' O0M O N N N 00 Q h ti h h .• ti N o M M It - E -01 .. Q a a ri w w a >W u wv a 4 oU w u mu 4 w uww ww w u ww O co W J W. CU J J J J \ C \ U w W W W w w r > > J G G ULL LL Q -J LL 0 ? Q¢ 4¢ Z Z LL 4 OC a 4 L W W coo OL4o W aw YY Y Y .+LL LL LL LL LL LLLL W u 4 L a4 uw 64 QQ Q N Q O LL LL LLLL LLLL K N u m m ❑ i I V. N a 44 0. x u J E i c 00C occ 00 U M u N O r. l I l. l. l. M c 09 a M W. N u M M M M N a K uwwuww 0 a O 0 Z N N v Co N u N M w owc XE w w www ZEW w co c r w ww ww ww q C:LLou << Z ¢•+ LL Z Z ZZ LC KE 6 aKj J >> >> ol v wo 4 a4 0 00 ww coocco 4 u J Q•+ 44 0_ 4 44 W Ol u 00 4 a c O 4 w W UoQQoU 4 Q 4 n a 4 4 0 4 a 4 4 = WOU =WO ¢ ==M mom U ¢> > ww uQuQuo W u E W G >> >> >> LL 4 4 N N mom ¢ M4w N LL Q Q ¢¢ K u N 4 W M M N M M M O U LL O N � r O U W W q ° 2 w Jo 4 w w E m N u 0 O w r r a N N LL Y •U-i a w Q LL V X a w J Q U J w 1 O x q u a a 0 4 N K V v u N w N N K O O O 0 O O O O W O O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 N W 0 N N M Z h h h h 00 0 N M 4 W 1t m m- d' In h co M d' N Z N N N N N N m 0 M M h h h h h h h h U- W S U •. +. .�.._._ 1______ A a A a A a A R A A A A a A A ., A A- A 9 9 9 9 A 9 9 R 9_ A E 0 R a a A C t t t t o t t*•••• s®• 09 s o* "Jl r w 4 I d x W h M o N O 0 � O 3 W x W x W J d d Y mw J E W J 2 Q LLU O � x x O T W LL F- 2 r U U =O w 0 WM x O 2 U � H O 4 > p f . ^.dpS, ^.A.'.R;,iiAPRRgJitS9Rpa aRR A g7:i8X9q£��,^.�RX �A O O O O u 0 0 0 O O I[1 r O T IP ICI z 0 o In a £ 0 O a N N N O N O c �0 a O 00 O d M V O r O O N O F- 00 N r O r O 00 O ot r o O ID r O Q O 2 � a w M. M b P O 10 O O N N P O N 0 •D O M a , d z w a z w x r w > z w r O W W W W LL N z Z w z W Z Z J Z £ W Z UU vU w ..w w a U J r w J d U w z N W p J p p Q H p Q w •� p '"' d LL +.. LLLL m a w LL W £ W d W W W x W x O W x 0 0 o o O w W W LL O LL LL > W E E LL W W 0 LL H J Fia U U I f l I l d' £ N �"� I I H I t+ H I I I �+ a Fri W Ul W N M W W N N W W £ 0 J J E j J w W a E dl J Q £ W w N W J �+ 0 O x U d d d d V' UI J U J J d a Z a a 4 J z d d J > Y a U) w ¢ W x W W Q W W a > > W x Q H 0 D w1 UI v N N H F -! U x F7 W > z W O x �I a U � x o G w x U d o w -7 J U w a o z li w -� d w o 0 r o z o x> T E 1- m x E J w U z v d Y p 2 p m 8 F'' Z O W O 6 4 N d z a F- H J z } F * J © f W J W x O Z £ x a W z W LL J 7 a - W J V a x W Un d LL LL 0 Z£ - J W z F4 .Ji x co Fa (-i x O 0 O O '0 O 0.. O O O O 0 O 0 O 0 # W Iq c O O O O O O O 111 O 0 O O c O O # m M H £ O O 0 M M O O 10 N •-� N O ^I x a Y T O •o .D d: •o N.. O .. V OD Z z O] W W co Cw Ow - w0. M' M 9]- P P P P PI i< W m �0 (w P O M V Ill •D r P. O N M Z M M M d' O C Y Y Y Y tl' 111 Y1 Y1 U W U CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 2 -12 -88 CHECK # 2205 - # 2372 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY GREEN, NORMAN L. $ 797.41 THOMPSON, JENNIFER S. 130.50 GREAVU, JOHN 458.33 ROSSBACH, GEORGE 383.33 BASTIAN, GARY 383.33 JUKER, FRAN 383.33 ANDERSON, NORMAN 383.33 McGUIRE, MICHAEL 2,330.59 BERM, LOIS 852.25 JAHN, DAVID 668.25 SWANSON, LYLE 966.57 CUDE, LARRY 242.40 ZUERCHER, JOHN 157.60 OSTER, ANDREA 745.85 FAUST, DANIEL 1,846.28 TAYLOR, LINDA 897.23 MATHEYS, ALANA 900.29 VIGNALO, DELORES 867.97 ANDERSON, CAROLE 1,146.46 AURELIUS, LUCILLE 1,705.48 SELVOG, BETTY 217.00 SCHADT, JEANNE 911.36 KELSEY, CONNIE 366.75 HOSCHKA, GERMAINE 316.65 VIETOR, LORRAINE 726.65 HENSLEY, PATRICIA 415.83 CARLE, JEANETTE 607.45 GREEN, PHYLLIS 929.05 COLLINS, KENNETH 1,917.48 RICHIE, CAROLE 706.65 SVENDSON, JOANNE 932.33 NELSON, ROBERT 1,675.88 DOLAN, RITA 249.20 OMATH, JOY 720.25 MARTINSON, CAROL 686.65 ZAPPA, JOSEPH 3,227.94 STILL, VERNON 1,656.21 SKALMAN, DONALD 1,719.31 NELSON, CAROL 3,190.95 MORELLI, RAYMOND 1,933.88 STEFFEN, SCOTT 2,139.26 ARNOLD, DAVID 3,415.19 PAYROLL CHECKS EMPLOYEE NAME BANICK, JOHN BOHL, JOHN CAHANES, ANTHONY CLAUSON, DALE MOESCHTER, RICHARD ATCHISON, JOHN H. PELTIER, WILLIAM SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS WELCHLIN, CABOT LANG, RICHARD PALMA, STEVEN HERBERT, MICHAEL DREGER, RICHARD MEEHAN JR, JAMES E. STAFNE, GREGORY BECKER, RONALD HALWEG, KEVIN STOCKTON, DERRELL PAULOS JR, PAUL BOWMAN, RICK KARIS, FLINT HEINZ, STEPHEN GRAF, DAVID THOMALLA, DAVID YOUNGREN, JAMES RAZSKAZOFF, DALE VORWERK, ROBERT BERGERON, JOSEPH MELANDER, JON EMBERTSON, JAMES WILLIAMS, DUANE RABINE, JANET STAHNKE, JULIE BOYER, SCOTT SARAFOLEAN, JULIA RYAN, MICHAEL NELSON, KAREN THOLEN, SHAWN FLAUGHER, JAYME HAIDER, KENNETH CHLEBECK, JUDY WEGWERTH, JUDITH MEYER, GERALD CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 2 -12 -88 CHECK # 2205 - # 2372 GROSS PAY $ 2,076.25 1,622.34 2,088.47 1,718.87 1,730.17 393.27 3,343.94 1,456.78 1,552.93 1,964.18 1,334.57 2,035.88 3,364.50 1,655.58 1,834.67 1,906.49 4,543.96 1,657.75 667.53 1,870.93 2,160.48 2,089.94 2,165.42 2,270.64 2,223.14 2,181.53 2,201.90 2,474.42 2,219.52 1,431.88 1,256.68 852.25 867.97 745.85 665.05 3,600.29 868.25 852.25 884.25 1,795.08 901.05 354.31 1,184.96 PAYROLL CHECKS EMPLOYEE NAME KANE, MICHAEL LUTZ, DAVID KLAUSING, HENRY SCHMOOCK, JOHN HELEY, RONALD OSWALD, ERICK TEVLIN JR, HARRY FREBERG, RONALD CASS, WILLIAM ELIAS, JAMES PECK, DENNIS PRIEBE, WILLIAM IRISH, BRUCE GESSELE, JAMES GEISSLER, WALTER LOFGREN, JOHN ODEGARD, ROBERT BRENNER, LOIS KRUMMEL, BARBARA STAPLES, PAULINE WILLIAMS, MATTHEW TRAVERS, DANIEL ANDERSON, RONALD LINDORFF, DENNIS HELEY, ROLAND MARUSKA, MARK BURKE, MYLES GERMAIN, DAVID THURIK, SCOTT STARK, RICHARD STRAUS, LAURA VARLAND, SUSAN SHELDON, LEO HANNEGAN, ANDREA WYATT, KATHLEEN COLLINS, ANDREA PODPESKAR, KIMBERLY MEYSEMBOURG, MARTIN GREEN, GUY YORKOVICH, SUSAN BESETH -JR., RONALD FISCHER, PATRICIA HECK, STACY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 2 -12 -88 CHECK # 2205 - # 2372 GROSS PAY 1,256.29 1,055.91 1,109.67 761.63 1,130.23 769.15 1,167.73 1,072.01 1,497.66 1,292.67 1,203.45 1,202.41 1,342.46 1,554.15 1,203.45 998.46 1,723.08 916.31 368.54 1,367.26 400.00 103.50 1,031.79 1,042.65 1,082.32 1,376.08 1,143.48 1,202.89 87.00 109.03 122.85 18.00 106.95 85.00 72.45 45.50 119.80 191.40 27.23 18.00 36.00 42.00 18.00 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 2 -12 -88 CHECK # 2205 - # 2372 EMPLOYEE NAME WARD, ROY TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS GREW, JANET CONNERS, KIM HORSNELL, JUDITH HUTCHINSON, ANN BARTA, MARIE DOHERTY, KATHLEEN OLSON, GEOFFREY LIVINGSTON, JOYCE EKSTRAND, THOMAS JOHNSON, RANDALL OSTROM, MARJORIE CARVER, NICHOLAS WENGER, ROBERT NADEAU, EDWARD MULWEE, GEORGE NUTESON, LAVERNE BREHEIM, ROGER EDSON, DAVID MULVANEY, DENNIS SPREIGL, GEORGE GROSS PAY $ 406.40 1,056.86 892.25 211.21 446.12 390.77 695.37 827.45 1,701.48 251.78 1,140.80 1,131.24 1,391.26 1,059.45 1,181.85 1,108.76 1,080.69 1,451.23 1,080.69 1,088.73 1,161.85 861.85 172,067.40 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION Z1 CITY & COUNTY EMP CR UNION Cl AFSCME 2725 U1 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS. 19 -3988 METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOC U3 MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION I1 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM Z2 AMOUNT 7,638.09 20,815.00 415.15 160.00 18.00 479.26 136.00 29,661.50 GRAND TOTAL 201,728.90 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 2 -26 -88 CHECK # 2384 - # 2551 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY McGUIRE, MICHAEL $ 2,330.59 BERM, LOIS 852.25 JAHN, DAVID 766.66 SWANSON, LYLE 832.25 CUDE, LARRY 242.40 ZUERCHER, JOHN 157.60 OSTER, ANDREA 745.85 FAUST, DANIEL 1,846.28 TAYLOR, LINDA 897.23 MATHEYS, ALANA 924.32 VIGNALO, DELORES 1,033.03 ANDERSON, CAROLE 1,146.46 AURELIUS, LUCILLE 1,705.48 SELVOG, BETTY 108.50 SCHADT, JEANNE 827.46 KELSEY, CONNIE 327.61 HOSCHKA, GERMAINE 306.77 VIETOR, LORRAINE 726.65 HENSLEY, PATRICIA 462.53 CARLE, JEANETTE 613.02 GREEN, PHYLLIS 929.05 COLLINS, KENNETH 1,917.48 RICHIE, CAROLE 706.65 SVENDSON, JOANNE 940.34 NELSON, ROBERT 1,675.88 DOLAN, RITA 276.12 OMATH, JOY 720.25 MARTINSON, CAROL 686.65 ZAPPA, JOSEPH 1,561.48 STILL, VERNON 1,352.68 SKALMAN, DONALD 1,403.88 NELSON, CAROL 1,739.12 MORELLI, RAYMOND 1,594.27 STEFFEN, SCOTT 1,573.26 ARNOLD, DAVID 1,561.48 BANICK, JOHN 1,607.31 BOHL, JOHN 1,624.72 CAHANES, ANTHONY 1,675.88 CLAUSON, DALE 1,403.88 MOESCHTER, RICHARD 1,524.87 PELTIER, WILLIAM 1,561.48 SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS 1,197.48 WELCHLIN, CABOT 1,469.60 LANG, RICHARD 1,471.62 PALMA, STEVEN 1,035.88 HERBERT, MICHAEL 1,437.47 DREGER, RICHARD 1,633.59 MEEHAN JR, JAMES E. 1,352.68 STAFNE, GREGORY 1,403.88 BECKER, RONALD 1,455.04 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 2 -26 -88 CHECK # 2384 - # 2551 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY HALWEG, KEVIN $ 2,275.49 STOCKTON, DERRELL 1,352.68 PAULOS JR, PAUL 580.09 BOWMAN, RICK 1,441.34 KARIS, FLINT 1,646.63 HEINZ, STEPHEN 1,582.71 GRAF, DAVID 1,467.08 THOMALLA, DAVID 1,740.80 YOUNGREN, JAMES 1,428.94 RAZSKAZOFF, DALE 1,454.28 VORWERK, ROBERT 1,733.51 BERGERON, JOSEPH 1,736.35 MELANDER, JON 1,441.48 EMBERTSON, JAMES 1,431.88 WILLIAMS, DUANE 1,256.68 RABINE, JANET 936.09 STAHNKE, JULIE 1,009.45 BOYER, SCOTT 883.10 SARAFOLEAN, JULIA 730.17 RYAN, MICHAEL 1754.45 NELSON, KAREN 1,028.45 THOLEN, SHAWN 1,009.45 FLAUGHER, JAYME 1,014.81 HAIDER, KENNETH 1,795.08 CHLEBECK, JUDY 901.05 WEGWERTH, JUDITH 589.75 MEYER, GERALD 1,115.91 KANE, MICHAEL 1,180.06 LUTZ, DAVID 1,044.99 KLAUSING, HENRY 1,102.65 SCHMOOCK, JOHN 753.05 HELEY, RONALD 1,062.65 OSWALD, ERICK 753.05 TEVLIN JR, HARRY 1,093.18 FREBERG, RONALD 1,062.65 CASS, WILLIAM 1,497.66 ELIAS, JAMES 1,270.37 PECK, DENNIS 1,225.85 PRIEBE, WILLIAM 1,223.89 IRISH, BRUCE 1,342.46 GESSELE, JAMES 1,368.00 GEISSLER, WALTER 1,203.45 LOFGREN, JOHN 941.08 ODEGARD, ROBERT 1,723.08 BRENNER, LOIS 868.25 KRUMMEL, BARBARA 359.72 STAPLES, PAULINE 1,367.26 WILLIAMS, MATTHEW 362.50 TRAVERS, DANIEL 105.75 PAYROLL CHECKS EMPLOYEE NAME ANDERSON, RONALD LINDORFF, DENNIS HELEY, ROLAND MARUSKA, MARK BURKE, MYLES GERMAIN, DAVID THURIK, SCOTT STARK, RICHARD STRAUS, LAURA DOUGHTY, LINDA R. LIBERTY, MICHAEL SHELDON, LEO HANNEGAN, ANDREA KOEGEL, RICHARD WYATT, KATHLEEN COLLINS, ANDREA WALLACE, JON THOMPSON, JENNIFER PODPESKAR, KIMBERLY MICKELSON, LISA MEYSEMBOURG, MARTIN GREEN, GUY CLEAVELAND, KATHERINE YORKOVICH, SUSAN BESETH -JR., RONALD FISCHER, PATRICIA HECK, STACY ADAMS, NIKKI FIRM, RACHEL WARD, ROY TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS GREW, JANET CONNERS, KIM HORSNELL, JUDITH HUTCHINSON, ANN BARTA, MARIE DOHERTY, KATHLEEN OLSON, GEOFFREY LIVINGSTON, JOYCE EKSTRAND, THOMAS JOHNSON, RANDALL OSTROM, MARJORIE CARVER, NICHOLAS WENGER, ROBERT NADEAU, EDWARD MULWEE, GEORGE NUTESON, LAVERNE BREHEIM, ROGER CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 2 -26 -88 CHECK # 2384 - # 2551 GROSS PAY 1,013.05 1,220.44 1,062.65 1,484.98 1,388.46 1,212.91 26.70 48.95 94.05 175.50 16.00 189.75 65.00 119.70 56.70 22.75 84.60 73.95 114.00 36.00 73.95 39.60 96.60 18.00 152.00 138.60 18.00 30.00 100.00 406.40 1,056.86 892.25 277.11 446.12 348.12 693.05 842.71 1,701.48 258.27 1,203.06 1,045.03 1,391.26 1,059.45 1,181.85 1,292.18 1,119.96 1,477.60 1,064.95 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 2 -26 -88 CHECK # 2384 - # 2551 EMPLOYEE NA ME GROSS PAY EDSON, DAVID $ 1,161.95 MULVANEY, DENNIS 1,161.85 SPREIGL, GEORGE 861.85 $145,712.46 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS AMOUNT ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION CITY & COUNTY EMP CR UNION AFSCME 2725 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS. 19 -3' METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOC L.E.L.S. MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM Z1 $ 5,980.68 Cl 21,367.00 U1 420.60 388 160.00 U3 18.00 P1 526.50 Z2 136.00 28,608.78 GRAND TOTAL $174,321.24 0 Agenda Number 1 � — "02 Action by CounoiVv AGENDA REPORT Endorsed___ ,. Modified. — TO: City Mana er Date 9 Date____,p - _� FROM: Finance Director RE: Designation of Official Depository and Financial Services Agreement DATE: February 29, 1988 INTRODUCTION Chapter 427.02 of the Minnesota Statutes gives authority to the City Council to designate at the beginning of each calendar year, or from time to time, financial institutions as depositories for City funds. It is proposed (1) that a one -year agreement with Maplewood State Bank for financial services be approved as outlined in their proposal and (2) that Maplewood State Bank be designated as the official depository for the City's demand deposits. BACKGROUND It has been past practice to request quotations from local financial institutions for checking account services. These quotations are expressed in terms of the size of the compensating balance required to be maintained in the City's checking account. During the past five years, the depositories have been Maplewood State Bank in 1983, First Minnesota Savings Bank from 1984 through 1986 and Maplewood State Bank in 1987. On January 22nd, letters requesting proposals for banking services were sent to all local banks and savings and loan institutions. These letters disclosed the service charges currently paid Maplewood State Bank. Each financial institution was requested to submit a one -year or two -year proposal based upon agreement terms presently in effect at Maplewood State Bank. Each financial institution was also requested to submit a proposal for lockbox services. The lockbox services are especially important to the City because a significant amount of personnel time is saved in the City Clerk's Department by having a bank process utility bill payments. Also, the lockbox service makes the utility bill payments available for investment more quickly. In the past, periodic delays occurred in the processing of utility bill remittances due to variations in other work demands (especially motor vehicle licensing) and when key personnel were absent due to illness or vacations. Also, the number of utility bill remittances vary greatly each day with the majority being received after the 20th of each month. The timely deposit of utility bill remittances via a lock box service has generated approximately $4,000 of QUOTATIONS In response to the letters requesting proposals, two proposals were received. The following is a comparison of the annual costs based upon service charges in the proposals received: First Minnesota also proposed, as an alternative, a compensating balance of $125,000 for checking account services and $250,000 for lockbox services. A third proposal was received from Norwest Bank. However, this proposal was incomplete (i.e., proposal forms and questionnaire .were not completed) and they indicated that they could not provide the lockbox services requested. In addition, the listing of service charges for checking was incomplete, but the charges that were listed were higher than the other banks that submitted proposals. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSALS Both of the proposals received complied with the proposed terms outlined in the Request for Proposal, except for minor deviations. Also, both of the banks that submitted proposals have provided satisfactory services in the past. Therefore, the annual cost of services is the key determinant of which bank should be the City's depository. The lowest cost proposal for checking account and lockbox services was from Maplewood State Bank. The alternative proposal of First Minnesota, to maintain a compensating balance in lieu of paying service charges, is not feasible as the service charges are less than the interest that could be earned by investing the compensating balance. (Annual interest, on a $375,000 certificate of deposit is $27,188). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended (1) that a one -year agreement with Maplewood State Bank for financial services be approved as outlined in their proposal and (2) that Maplewood State Bank be designated as the official depository for the City's demand deposits. ACTION NEEDED Council adoption of the attached Resolution is needed to implement the recommendations. Estimated Annual Costs Checking Lockbox Total First Minnesota $6,280 $13,151 $19,431 Maplewood State Bank 6,054 9,645 15,699 1987 costs at Maplewood State Bank 5,807 9,219 15,026 First Minnesota also proposed, as an alternative, a compensating balance of $125,000 for checking account services and $250,000 for lockbox services. A third proposal was received from Norwest Bank. However, this proposal was incomplete (i.e., proposal forms and questionnaire .were not completed) and they indicated that they could not provide the lockbox services requested. In addition, the listing of service charges for checking was incomplete, but the charges that were listed were higher than the other banks that submitted proposals. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSALS Both of the proposals received complied with the proposed terms outlined in the Request for Proposal, except for minor deviations. Also, both of the banks that submitted proposals have provided satisfactory services in the past. Therefore, the annual cost of services is the key determinant of which bank should be the City's depository. The lowest cost proposal for checking account and lockbox services was from Maplewood State Bank. The alternative proposal of First Minnesota, to maintain a compensating balance in lieu of paying service charges, is not feasible as the service charges are less than the interest that could be earned by investing the compensating balance. (Annual interest, on a $375,000 certificate of deposit is $27,188). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended (1) that a one -year agreement with Maplewood State Bank for financial services be approved as outlined in their proposal and (2) that Maplewood State Bank be designated as the official depository for the City's demand deposits. ACTION NEEDED Council adoption of the attached Resolution is needed to implement the recommendations. RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED, that the Maplewood State Bank is hereby designated as the depository for demand deposits of the City of Maplewood, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that an agreement is hereby approved with Maplewood State Bank for financial services based upon the terms in their proposal dated February 26, 1988, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that funds deposited in said bank may be withdrawn by check when signed by the signature, or by the facsimile signature, of the Mayor, City Manager and Finance Director, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that funds in said bank may be wire transferred at the request of the Finance Director, Assistant Finance Director, or Accountant for the purchases of City investments, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that deposits in said bank shall not exceed the amount of F.D.I.C. insurance covering such deposit unless collateral or a bond is furnished as additional security, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this depository designation shall be effective upon adoption of this resolution and continue to be effective until a new depository is designated. E TO: City Manager FROM: Randall Johnson, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HRA Commissioner Reappointment DATE: February 18. 1988 Request Action by Counoil:, Endorsod_ __ Modified_,_ Rejected —.. — Date,—_ „_ Commissioner Dale Carlson is requesting reappointment to the HRA. (Refer to the attached letter.) Comments Commissioner Carlson has attended 22 of the 23 meetings held since he was appointed. HRA commissioners are appointed for five -year terms. Recommendation Reappoint Commissioner Dale Carlson to the HRA for a five -year term. kd Attachment 1890 Barclay Street Maplewood, MN 55109 February 15, 1988 Randall Johnson Associate Planner City of Maplewood 1830 E. Co. Rd. B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Randy: 2.1 b. '88 As you know, my term on the Housing and Redevelopment Authority expires March 1989. I have enjoyed these past few years on the HRA and I have learned quite a bit. I am writing to let you know that I would like to be reappointed to another 5 year term. I look forward to continue working with the HRA group. Sincerely, 00&f `wI • Dale H. Carlson cc: Lorraine Fischer 2 '/ Action by Counoil:1 Endorsed..,,.. Modified -- -_ Re j eotocL pate MEMORANDUM To: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Parks & Recreatio Subj: Return of Funds To PAC Commercial Account Date: March 7, 1988 0 Introduction The Park and Recreation Commission and Director have discussed the need to return previously budgeted funds for Capital Improve- ment projects to the Commercial PAC Account. As a new Capital Improvement Projects Program is developed, we will again be requesting the Council to approve funds from the PAC Account. The following projects and amounts can be returned to the Com- mercial PAC Fund: Project # Project Amount 346 Heritage Center $15,150 361 Hazelwood Soccer 75,640 364 Kohlman Park 5 366 Trails 23,270 374 Trails at Hazelwood 10,050 390 Trail at Nature Center 8,445 391 North Hazelwood 25,265 397 Playcrest Excavation 10,000 Recommendation It is requested that the City Council approve the cancellation of the above projects and return the monies to the Commercial PAC Account. k/c: City Clerk AGENDA REPORT To: City Manager Michael McGuire .,� From: Chief of Police Kenneth V. Collins /Izc� Subject: Budget Transfer for Sound and Recording System for City Council Chambers Date: March 8, 1988 Introduction The amount budgeted for the replacement of the City Council Chambers sound and recording system was $12,000. Background E -S Action by Counoi.7,: Endorsed _ modifie Rejecte — . Date. The sound and recording system in the new City Council Chambers was found to be inadequate for the new building. Several companies were contacted. They evaluated our old system as well as made recommendations for a new system. Two of the companies attempted to give demonstrations of their top —of— the —line equipment. The City Council has authorized the purchase of a new sound and recording system. Blumberg Communications and Wahl and Wahl, Inc., were selected as the supplier for the new sound and recording system, at a total cost of $13,643. This was $2,037 under the bid submitted by Audio Electronics. The purchase price of this equipment is approximately $1,700 over the budgeted amount. Recommendation It is recommended that $1,700 be transferred from the contingency fund to cover the costs that exceeded the budgeted amount. Action Required The proposal should be submitted to the City Council for their review and approval. KVC:js AGENDA ITEM E Action by Council: TO: City Manager Endorse FROM: City Engineer Modified--- SUBJECT: Final Payment District 6 Water, Project 86 -03 DATE: March 8, 1988 Rejecte Date — Attached is the recommendation for final payment from the engineer for District 6 water. The contractor has completed the work in conformance with the plans and specifications. It is recommended the city council adopt a resolution approving final pyament to L & G Rehbein in the amount of x;62,131.84. jc Attachment AM r5EH ENGINEERS ■ ARCHITECTS ■ PLANNERS February 8, 1988 Mr. Ken Haider City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Haider: 222 EAST LITTLECANADA ROAD, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612484 -0272 RE: MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA SERVICE DISTRICT NO. 6 TRUNK WATERMAINS CITY PROJECT NO. 86 -03 SEH FILE NO.: 86217 All construction and corrective work has been completed. The Contractor therefore has made Application for Final Payment in the amount of $63,631.84. Due to damage on City owned lands, caused by the Contractor, this amount is recommended to be reduced by $1,500.00 for a final payment of $62,131.84. The final contract amount is for $589,677.48, which is $75,132.68 above the amount originally bid. The reasons for the increase are as follows: 1. Addition of Change Order No. 1 to perform grading in a ponding area near Beaver Creek. 2. Addition of Change Order No. 2 to perform grading in the Geranium Park. 3. Addition of casing pipe along Larpenteur Avenue due to conflict with an abandoned watermain not shown on City records. 4. Paving of a driveway in return for construction easements. 5. Addition of several air vents and blow offs, as required by the St. Paul Water Utility after plan approval. 6. Addition of landscape plantings, as required by the St. Paul Parks Department for sue of their property for a watermain easement. 7. Additional muck removal and granular fill along the Sterling Street alignment. After the watermain plans were approved and bids received, the developer requested that the street SHORT ELLIOTT ST. PAUL, CHIPPEWAFALLS, HENDRICKSON INC. MINNESOTA WISCONSIN alignment follow the watermain. At the request of the City, additional peat was removed adjacent to the watermain berm to allow for adequate subgrade for the future street. Reductions to the construction cost were made by deleting topsoiling, seeding, and culverts along the Sterling Avenue berm. This work will be performed under the Hillcrest Trunk Sanitary Sewer. The Contractor has experienced financial difficulties during the course of the project. The Bonding Company has been contacted and is advising the assignment of final payment; a joint check in the names of Water Products and L & G Rehbein in the amount of $7,747.83, and a joint check in the names of U.S. Pipe and L & G Rehbein in the amount of $54,374.01. Sincerely, David J. Pillatzke DJP /kru AGENDA ITEM r q MEMORANDUM Action by Counail:. Endorsed. TO: City Manager Modified._ _ FROM: City Clerk Redeotedm_ RE: Purchase of City Pins Da.te_.._._- DATE: March 8, 1988 The Council has shown an interest in obtaining promotional pins for the City that can be given out. TBW Industries has designed a pin with a red Maple Leaf on white background with black lettering. If the City purchases in large quantity, such as 1000 pins, the cost is $1.30 each and no charge for the dye costs. Any less than that amount would cost $2.15 each, plus dye costs. There is $850 in the budget, but an additional amount of $550 is needed. It is recommended that $550 be transferred from the Contingency Account to cover this added cost. x I IdAP4 ti� OF F. c 4u ct, 1 5' Z-e,2 � � � MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Variance and Rezoning (R-1 to R^2) LOCATION: 1764 County Road B APPLICANT: Marion Svendsen OWNER: Marion Svendsen and Donald Kaiser DATE: February 24, 1988 SUMMARY Aotionby Counullv Eudoroed-.~_^.~^°^^ Mo8ifla8.~~~~...°� Dnjeotad.~...�..~~=. Data-~.~~__~ The applicant is requesting approval of a density variance and a zone change from R~1, single dwelling residential to R~2 double dwelling residential, in order to split the property to create two 65-foot-wide single dwelling lots" Refer to the site plan and letter of request on iages 8 and 9" 1. Code allows smaller single-dwelling lots (60-foot-width minimum) in R-2 zones, provided they have at least 7,500 square feet of lot area and do not exceed the density requirements of the land use plan. 2. On March 24, 1986, council approved a new density conversion table for calculating the maximum population density for residential development. Use of this new criteria has been on hold pending completion of a sewer plan for the city by our engineering department to show whether an increase in the number of units per acre would increase the sewage flow. The Metropolitan Council will not approve the new density criteria until this sewer plan is completed, 1^ Denial, based on this current criteria density allowed, even (Code requires a 10,0 amendment to Rh, high density variance. the present density calculation criteria" Under the neighborhood is already over the maximum though the average lot size is 10,909 square feet )0 square-foot minimum in R-1 districts.) A plan density residential would be needed to avoid the 2. Rezone the property to R-^2 and grant a density variance. Two 7,638 square-foot lots would probably not be in character with this neighborhood if they were located in the middle of the area. The proposed location, however has a lot planned commercial on the east Group Health to the north and fronts on County Road B - a heavily travelled street. Therefore, there should be no adverse effect on the neighborhood. Recommen L.— I^ Adoption of the resolution on page 13 granting a density variance for the creation of two 65-foot-frontage single dwelling lots in a R~2 district" Approval is on the basis that: A. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because the city has not completed a sewer study necessary for the Metropolitan Council to approve the city's new density criteria" The city has been working on this study for over two years. A variance would not be necessary if the density criteria were in effect. B. This delay is not the fault of the property owner. C. The variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The resulting density would comply with the new criteria. Single dwellings are proposed in a single dwelling neighborhood. The adjacent lot to the east is not planned for residential, Group Health is across the street and the lots would front on County Road B ~ a high traffic road. D^ Tha variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. II" Adoption of the resolution on page 11 rezoning the property at 1764 East County Road B from R-1 to R-2. Rezoning is based on the findings required by ordinance" � CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff surveyed the 26 surrounding property owners within 350 feet for their opinion of this request. Of the 12 replies, four had no comment, one was in favor and seven objected. (See page 10 .) Staff comment: Most of the objections are to the potential of a double dwelling being constructed. If the existing house remains, the remaining lot area and frontage would be too small for a double dwelling" A double dwelling could be constructed if the existing house were removed. This is not the intent of the property owner" Prior to approval of a lot division, the applicant would have to verify that the setback of the existing garage would comply with the code's five-foot minimum setback. The Ramsey County Assessor's office has stated that there is not evidence that a double dwelling by itself would cause a decrease in property value for nearby single dwellings. Over time, however, if due to a lack of upkeep, there could then be a negative effect on adjacent property values" 3 REFERENCE Site Descrintion 1" Existing Lot Size: 15,275 square feet . 2" Proposed Lot Sizes: 7,638 square feet 3" Existing Land Use: single dwelling and garage on the east half of the property" 9t..trrQUndin.9 Land Uses Northerly: County Road B and-Group Health Southerly: undeveloped single-dwelling lot Westerly: single dwellings Easterly: undeveloped lot zoned R-1 and planned SC, service commercial 1" Land use plan designation: RL, low density residential 2. Density of the residential lots on Burke Avenue and County Road B. (See page 7°) Current density = 21 lots Density with all lots developed, included two homes on Svendsen's lot = 24 lots Density allowed by code under current criteria (4"1 people/unit) = 22 lots Density allowed by code under the new criteria (3^4 people/unit) = 24 lots 3" Zoning = R-1 4" Ordinance requirements: a. Section 36~88 (b) and (c) (1) states: "/(b) No single-family dwelling shall be built or structurally altered in an R-2 Residence District on a site less than seven thousand five hundred (7 square feet in area" »(c) The minimum lot width in an R~2 Residence District for: (1) Single dwellin9s shall be sixty (60) feet for interior lots and eighty-five (85) feet for corner lots." 12 b^ Section 36-88 (e) states: n(e) The density in an R-2 Residence District shall not exceed the maximum density permitted by the land use classification and people per unit designated in the city's adopted comprehensive plan." C. Section 36~90 states that each single-dwelling lot with less than 75 feet of width shall have two side yards of not less than five feet of width, but a total side yard area of not less than 15 feet of width. Only ten feet of side yard area is required in standard single-dwelling subdivisions^ d" Section 36-485 requires four findings for approval of a rezonirig. These findings are listed in the resolution on page 6 ° 5° Section 367"10 Subdivision 6 (2) of the state law requires that the following findings be made before a variance can be granted: a. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. b° The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance, "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. kd Attachments: 1" Sherwood Glen Land Use Map 2" Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4" Applicant's Justification for Rezoning 5. Neighbor Objections 6" Resolution ^~ Rezoning 7. Resolution - Variance � for r, IJ nMl Id Pli:� - aa 1 . ��N n .. ! �= � a PRE IIH 11 1 _ I •� '1- - i Ir,I IW� .�I '. i �Ili� �1 Glfl�il7 ow TM PIP �J N G w j r _ gp p 1ui,'� ii�u IJY ■ h � � y r. „� , _ 11111 I�IM ac'�a .�'�■ _ SHERWOOD GLEN LAND USE PLAN 0 N Attachment 1 of 94 A \ d 94 B oe' of � 1 " � ✓� is � L'I 14•a ii. � ( r <; , 7 a�9ll0 l 11 .1 46 ( `!t •� =r1 . 1754 1764 (1) T(y) rliol 1 fit Y y 1 z3 x zs xc x xx� ts� IL xslu� I I 1 20 1747 , V55' ,o Y^ 7619 v s Pi Ks•ls sees t- R r tow To \ Io . 1 71 ry m D(l5 • 1 0 . 7 3 (40) f . , 1 Q7.35 ac) PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 7 Attachment 2 4 w 0 t< � W 1 SITE PLAN 8 Attachment 3 0 N Rezoning Application We would like to change the existing zoning at 1764 East County Road B, Maplewood, from R -1 to R -2. There is 130 feet of property, and we would like to change.it to two 65 —foot lots for residential. There is a small house on the easterly 65 feet of the property now, so this division will give us another 65 —foot lot to sell. We have tried for three years to sell the house with the additional lot but have been unable to do so, and we're getting to the point of extreme financial difficulty. The taxes, water, electric, gas and sewer charges are very high. The house has been vacant three years. Annual expenses include: taxes — $1,179.52; water — $40; electric and gas — approximately $1,000; sewer — $120. We have talked to the immediate neighbors, and they are in agreement with the division. I feel the change will benefit the neighborhood. A nice, new home will enhance their existing older homes. Marion L. Svendsen 9 Attachment 4 I• _ CC I object to this proposal 0b'4Lc.4ioA5 beca'Lse it w•✓cv cAdse aPJoo cOoJegF>77w.i iI 7741 -S AIW A AIARtRt s0. . AA _w �I object to this proposal becausip .M � vl. i1 B� 8 /1 - . A n^ „ 44. n you ject. descri a 'low or draw on the enclosed map a changes hat would make this project acceptable. 15. Y I object to this proposal because f��� � ," — b, - ,(_I object to this proposal because 7; IeOPOS44 /N4ztjOSS 7WS' Pr�iPOv/I L. of UVPL,4L M.-W ffv^wrr CAk- If you object, describe below or d aw on the enclosed map any changes that would make this project acceptable. / w, N O ,— APPA r fAlr 4v9_71PLF TYPF Ful -AI VAS o a✓ TKF JPc. tr Loy r Project: Svendsen Rezoning I you object, describe below or draw on the enclosed map any c ang 07 • would make this project acceptable. A Ie X e S 10 Attachment 5 it you object, describe Melow or draw on the enclosed map any - changes thatl would make this oro.iect acceptable_ If you object. describe below or draw on the enclosed map any changes that would make this project acceptable. iA4 ✓t Ma ZajiN6 AS IS Ao on Nor pi✓�pe TNe io r; I object to this proposal because i t ypu object, describe below or draw on the enclosed - map any changes that wouTO make this project acceptable. p ; e e4twl �'f (t/ L n Project, Rezoning 3 • �I object to this proposal because T do j vift a4 - F - 1.� 03F a dovblt i bvl\+ +w *e Cats. TE Qez•. 14, v,1J If you object, describe elow or draw on the enclosed map any changes that would make this project acceptable. R - 2, A wA VW•Ulb lee th Qu 1 0 1� c Y1¢�.K��1 I . �I object to this proposal becausip .M � vl. i1 B� 8 /1 - . A n^ „ 44. n you ject. descri a 'low or draw on the enclosed map a changes hat would make this project acceptable. 15. Y I object to this proposal because f��� � ," — b, - ,(_I object to this proposal because 7; IeOPOS44 /N4ztjOSS 7WS' Pr�iPOv/I L. of UVPL,4L M.-W ffv^wrr CAk- If you object, describe below or d aw on the enclosed map any changes that would make this project acceptable. / w, N O ,— APPA r fAlr 4v9_71PLF TYPF Ful -AI VAS o a✓ TKF JPc. tr Loy r Project: Svendsen Rezoning I you object, describe below or draw on the enclosed map any c ang 07 • would make this project acceptable. A Ie X e S 10 Attachment 5 it you object, describe Melow or draw on the enclosed map any - changes thatl would make this oro.iect acceptable_ Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, was duly called and held in the council chambers in said City on the day of at 7:00 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Marion L. Svendsen initiated a rezoning from R~1 single dwelling residential to R-2, double dwelling residential for the following described property: WEST 10 FEET OF LOT 3 ALL OF LOTS 4 5 AND 6, BLOCK 1, AND THE NORTH HALF OF THE VACATED ALLEY IN KREDEL/S ADDITION TO GLADSTONE. This property is also known as 1764 East County Road B, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1^ This rezoning was initiated by Marion L. Gvendsen, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood code of ordinances. 2" This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on , 198 The Planning Commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be " 3" The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law" All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and Planning Commission, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCI[. that the above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: ) 1" The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code" 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3° The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community where applicable, and the public welfare" 11 Attachment 6 4" The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools" Adoption this day of Seconded by Ayes-- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS" > CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) \ I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 19 v with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this rezoning. Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of , 198 ° City Clerk City of Maplewood Minnesota 12 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, was duly called and held in the council chambers in said City on the ~~~~~_ day of 198_ at 7:00 p.m. ��-- The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Marion L. Svendsen applied for a variance for the following-described property: WEST 10 FEET OF LOT 3, ALL OF LOTS 4, 5 AND 6, BLOCK 1, AND THE NORTH HALF OF THE VACATED ALLEY IN KREDEL/S ADDITION TO GLADSTONE" This property is also known as 1764 East County Road B, Maplewood; WHEREAS, Section 36-88 (e) of the Maplewood code of ordinances requires that the density in a R-2 residence district shall not exceed the maximum density permitted by the City's land use plan; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing an overall neighborhood density of seventeen persons per net acre, requiring a variance of three persons per net acre; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1^ This variance was applied for on October 23, 1987° I 2" This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on , 198_" The Planning Commission recommended to the city council that said variance by " � 3" The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on to consider this variance. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements" The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and Planning Commission" NOR, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1" Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because the city has not completed a sewer study necessary for the Metropolitan Council to approve the city's new density criteria" 2" This delay is not the fault of the property owner. 3" The variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The resulting density would comply with the new 13 Attachment 7 criteria" Single dwellings are proposed in a single dwelling neighborhood. The adjacent lot to the east is not planned for residential, Group Health is across the street and the lots would front on County Road B - a high traffic road" 4. The variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Adopted this day of , 198 Seconded by Ayes-- STATE OF MINNESOTA } ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. > CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of � 198 , with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this variance. Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of v 198 ° City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 14 Planning Commission -2- Minutes 2 -29 -88 V. PU I HEARINGS VI. VIS R PRESENTATIONS VII. COMMUNI TIONS VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Variance and Rezoning: 1764 Co. Rd. B (Svendsen) Secretary Olson presented the staff report. He said that most of the objections of the citizen comments were concerned with the idea of a double dwelling being built on this property. Marion Svendsen, 1597 Frost Avenue, the applicant, discussed the request with the commissioners. Commissioner Fischer moved the planning commission: I. Adopt the resolution granting a density variance for the creation of two 65- foot - frontage single - dwelling lots in a R -2 district. Approval is on the basis that: A. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because the city has not completed a sewer study necessary for the Metropolitan Council to approve the city's new density criteria. The city has been working on this study for over two years. A variance would not be necessary if the density criteria were in effect. B. This delay is not the fault of the property owner. C. The variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The resulting density would comply with the new criteria. Single dwellings are proposed in a single dwelling neighborhood. The adjacent lot to the east is not planned for residential, Group Health is across the street and the tots would front on County Road B - a high traffic road. D. The variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. II. Adopt the resolution rezoning the property at 1764 East County Road B from R -1 to R -2. Rezoning is based on the findings required by ordinance. Planning Commission Minutes 2~29-88 ~3~ Seconded by Commissioner Sletten B" Conditi Ted Meyer of Leer, In business on thi discussed with runoff control. Roger Anitzberg the request" Ayes--Amdahl, Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal., Dempsey, Fiala, Fischer, Larson, Sigmundik, Sletten I Use Permit: Castle Ave. (Leer, Inc") penheimer Wolff & Donnelly was sent and said interested in pursuing the trucl topper sales property, if they can get a oval^ He Ahe commissioners the issue of the storm-water 1949 Castle Avenue, spmhe in opposition to Dick Nord of Hillc st Oevelopment he would like to proceed with the pr ct with appr ontin9ent an a grading plan which would no dd additiona r to the problem until the drainage problem with the adj nt te property can be resolved. \ / Commissioner Larson mo d appro of a conditional use permit for truck topper sales1 / Commissioner Sigmundik Ayes~^~Axdahl, Ayers, Barrett, Dempsey, Fiala, Goins, Larson, \/ Sigmundik Nays---Cardinal , Fischer Sletten The commissioners votiP r submitting a drainage an aq leto th tabling this request til th sibility sewer is complet C. Preliminary at Street ;; and Hillwood Cou1t ddition of the applicant a city engineer or study for the storm Rezoning: Hennen Lawrence , Itaska Engineering, as present for Hennen Develo t objected to the recommendation for Outlot id the applicant w be reimbursed for costs t s and utilities. He concerned regarding Items 9. would require a v ce" He also objected to Item which deeds Outlot C to abutting property owner. felt that Item 1^1,(2) was t necessary and 1-1.(3) was the ty/s responsibility" He a1 said there was not a need fP� a temporary Hillwood Drive cu�-de~sac^ � / _� MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: City tanager Thomas Ekstrand--Associate Planner Conditional Use Permit Castle Avenue Leer, Inc" Hillcrest Development Truck Topper Sales February 24, 1988 SUMMARY Action by Counci1v Endorsed ~.~~.~~~~~ @od1fiod~~__~_~~ Rejected .~,..~..��. Dato The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit for truck-topper sales" Refer to the site plan on page 8 and letter on page- 9. A conditional use permit is required since the site is within 350 feet of residentially-zoned property" 1° On July 22, 1985 the city council rezoned the proposed site from R- 1, single-dwelling residential to M-1 light manufacturing, and amended the land use plan from W, water tower, to BW, business-warehousing. This action was based on Ramsey County District Court's order to approve the plan amendment and consistent zoning for this and adjacent property. 2. On September 14, 1987, the city council granted a conditional use permit for a building addition to John Glenn Jr. High School. Condition Two required that no occupancy permits shall be issued until construction contracts have been signed for the development of a new storm sewer system, or until on-site ponding is provided that limits the rate of discharge to current levels" (This was required due to drainage problems in the neighborhood.) Storm-water runoff control is the main issue with this proposal due to the recurring drainage problems behind the homes to the west. Before development should be allowed on any of these uphill lots, a storm sewer improvement project should be approved by council and construction contract signed. Without this condition, the finding (Number Five on Page ]]) for the granting of a conditional use permit could not be made. Condition Eight states that the use should not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities. The city engineer feels that costs for the storm sewer may be excessive. This application should be tabled until the feasibility study documents these costs. RecommendallOn Table this request until the feasibility study for the storm sewer is completed. If council decides to approve it, a resolution is attached on page 12" � CITIZEN COMMENTS Questionnaires were mailed to the 13 property owners within 350 feet of this site for their opinions of this request. Of the eight replies, one had no comment, three were in favor, and four objected. 1" The property is zoned M-1. 2. It might help selling our property across the highway. 3" I am in favor of this proposal only if it will bring in storm sewer and sanitary sewer to the surrounding area" 1" I object because the area should be residential only" 2. I object due to higher class homes being built and developed adjacent to Hillcrest's property" I would like to see projects that will enhance, tie in and be harmonious with the very nice adjacent residential area" Lots of commercial land and "would be" commercial on the north side of Highway 36. Hillcrest has lots of commercial land for this north of Highway 36, either in Maplewood or North St" Paul, My brother, Billy Queen, is in favor of my proposal also" Staff comment: This property cannot be developed residentially, as required by Ramsey County District Court (see background). The property across from this north of Highway 36 is proposed for low density residential development. 3" I object because this proposal is an "eyesore" to the prevailing community and destructive to property values" Build a decent-looking building and display inside. Staff comment: The Ramsey County Assessor's office indicated that it is possible that residential properties directly adjacent to commercial development may not increase in value as quickly as those lots further away. Furthermore, any negative effect on residential property values would likely be caused by frontage on Highway 36 and not by commercial development. 4. Refer to the letter on page 10. Staff comment: As mentioned above, this site is required by court decision to be developed as zoned. If this use is found to meet all of the requirements for the granting of a conditional use permit, the site layout, landscaping and building design will be subject to the approval of the city's design review board" (Mr. Anitzberger's property is not within the 350-foot notification radius") .3 REFERENCE 1" Site size: gross area - 1,2 acres net area ^~ 24,000 square feet 2. Existing land use: undeveloped jgrrgMDdin9 Land (Uses Northerly: Highway 36. The land north of Highway 36 is undeveloped property zoned R-1, Southerly: Maplewood water tower Easterly and Westerly: Undeveloped M-1 property east Action 2-9-86: The community design review board gave conceptual approval to the site plan for this project subject to their review of revisions. Condition Two stated that construction shall not take place until a storm sewer improvement project is ordered by the city council and a construction contract is signed. t" Land Use Plan designation: BW 2" The BW classification includes governmental and public utility buildings and structures, storage and warehousing facilities, wholesale business and office establishments, cartage and express facilities, radio and television stations and other industrial uses of a lower-intensity nature. 3" Ioningx M-1 4. Section 36~187 (b) states that no building or exterior use, except parking, may be erected, altered or conducted within 350 feet of a residential district without a conditional use permit, 5" Section 36-442 (b) requires that approval of a conditional use permit be based on the ten findings listed in the resolution on page 12. Eqblic Works 1" This site is not served by water, storm sewer or sanitary sewer. Water is about 300 feet west at Castle Avenue and undeveloped German Street" 2° Surface runoff is a serious concern. This site drains westerly onto properties presently experiencing drainage problems. Construction on this site should not take place until a storm sewer improvement project is ordered by council for this area and construction contracts are signed for the work" 5° A state driveway permit must be obtained for access. Public SafRety Section 10.301 (c) of the state fire safety code requires that when any portion of the building would be 150 feet or more from a water supply on a public street, there shall be provided, when required by the chief, on~ site hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow. Water supply may consist of reservoirs, pressure tanks, elevated tanks, water mains or other fixed system capable of supplying the required fire flow" mb Attachments; 1" Sherwood Glen Land Use Plan 2^ Property Line/Zoning Map 3, proposed site plan dated 11-~25-87 4" Applicant's statement 5. Letter from Roger Anitzber9er 6. Resolution 7° CDR8 minutes � `o u o 0 c � e v o E E E �kll - A d�9q In f °r cftenpe q(Inllpal I r I er e f In ] J • Snnmw iw o n = :194}1 SC h RM y fi 1 3 ` .: __�: _ r ._. ♦ � Lj—T� Tai n inl�fTU; I� I TOT a Sol bs i � � F'� -�I+�i M- F� ..= Hhsf� ��_ I 1 ^� *' ro 1 ✓� /J - I - . liI ff - d.. Ion �r min�r •rt•tld I \, �ti ora It e e e - N � p 4 � W i 0 m 0 c SHERWOOD GLEN NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN Attnh:7Pnt 1 0 N a 13 (3) � C =m , E e 14 (4) 10 9 8 ;; 7 a i 5 4 3 2 1 - 1 (7) (8) (9) ( Z) (13) IR 9 00 Ste so 100 070 Da o ■ ■i■" � I N G r -- I - -- '---- - - - - -- ■ ior - - - - - I - - - - -- 36.160 ft - - - - - - - ' Maplewood Ip 4+ <:: 40 3 7 Nursing Home ;; 1928 °' k` ` + I 1 9 24 25 27 2B PROPOSED SITE c :.; . 929 i 1922 ( . / _ /' 8 AO A 7 1 3 I _ - 1���^ •4° a i. •• :;ii): a .. .a )q I 14 I 2 11 10 9 7 4 3 2 1 I S 14 13 12 1 10 9; @:; <? ?; >': 4 3 2 J ~ VA ED _ I6 17 I 120121 1 1 1 i Y 0 ,a , 19/. - 1 K co 14o1 •ii I n I I ., 1 1; Water Tower asNM�W" AVE —aKO.a GO 9 r N oll (SL) I in n 011 (54) V N S T. PA 594.14 AV E Z. ! C55) I r II ( 02G I - - - ke . .47. I ,/ I 070 I le >1op1J 1 I I ( a N A n Una 3.45 PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 7 Attachment 2 V Q N D .3L•' - 17L07 317 2 2 5 [ � b) 20 2(33)o 3 24 �� It 3 ! i (37)A, tP7 Vg w 0 �) 3 (+)23 (e)4 all 22� • •• v ' 4� � ) ./lac. (3 8) (p) (70 a•S 4 7 ) 20 (i l) 7 Ij 3s) 2 ws.u'�'�R .GL.. GO 9 r N oll (SL) I in n 011 (54) V N S T. PA 594.14 AV E Z. ! C55) I r II ( 02G I - - - ke . .47. I ,/ I 070 I le >1op1J 1 I I ( a N A n Una 3.45 PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 7 Attachment 2 V Q N 10' To�oPw K.t I I , : I 1. 1 4 p`L I ye. a0 d — \ I LiG4 Woo 21n 01rrcfr.e - 8 '1d � 4C ✓m.nrm 5id,� I AAR Imo/ S✓ !w1 eeC� ,o' io Toppw R4- t f R� SITE PLAN $ NOV p 5 1 Attachment 3 Leer Midwest A DivisIon of Leer Inc 58288 Ventura Drive Bkfi rl IN 46517 219 522 LEER (5337) Statement The King Of Caps The property will be used as a retail location for the purpose of selling truck toppers. There will be no health or safety hazards, no noise, air or water pollution associated with the proposed location. The location is located off of U.S. 36 which is lined with retail businesses. There is a frontage road access from U.S. 36 to ease any congestion problems. This business activity is not an operation which will generate excessive traffic. It is estimated that this location will sell approximately 800 units in 1988. Assuming only 508 closing ratio, somewhere less than 2000 customers will visit this lot in a year's time. This averages out to about seven customers per day. Leer, inc., the lessee, is a national organization with more than 600 dealers across the country maintaining operations similar to this proposed operation. 9 Attachment 4 October 25, 1987 To: Geoff Olson Director of Community Development Subject: Proposed Truck Topper Sales at Ariel and South of Highway 36 on Castle Avenue, in Front of the Water Tower From: Roger Anitzberger 1949 Castle Avenue Maplewood 777 -0932 I OBJECT TO THE ABOVE PROPOSED PROJECT. Maplewood is being downgraded by the area populace as not a conducive area to live in or relocate to. It seems the City has lost it's objective for proper management of commercial development. No longer has City management utilized it's control for planned growth. Not so many years ago, Maplewood actually was concerned about their area residents! Now the major thoroughfares are dotted with commercial ventures within and in between residential areas. Commercial development should be in designated large space areas and not crammed into or on borders of residential areas. Expensive homes are currently planned and being built directly south and east of this proposed site. Homes or open space should be designated for the proposed site. Once this area is lost to this type of development, it is gone . forever, laying precedent for any junk development in the future. The property directly south of Highway 36 and north of Cope was changed a while ago from Rl to RM for quads or townhouse develop- ment to buffer the existing residents from commercial. What was wrong with the original R1 or to have designated this area as open space? When these changes were made, we were told that Business Warehouse meant storage facilities. Access to this topper sales establishment is blocked off at Highway 36 and Castle Avenue. traffic on Highway 36 has access onto Castle will exit at White Bear Avenue and circulate thoroughfare, forcing traffic in front of th a burden on the neighborhood. limited with Ariel Only east -bound Avenue. West -bound onto an already busy Nursing Home, putting There'already exists a topper sales business west of White Bear Ave. on the north side of Highway 36. Is White Bear Avenue and Hwy. 36 to be known as the topper sales of Maplewood? Is this to be like the auto dealers along Highway 61 or the fast -food centers on south Robert Street and on White Bear Avenue in the Maplewood Mall area? I think two topper sales at the same interchange is an eye- 10 Attachment 5 sore. Should this intersection of White Bear Avenue and Highway 36 be developed into the same mess that exists at Larpenteur and White Bear Avenues? Maplewood's control of commercial,development is totally out of hand and needs to be revisited and placed back in sync with proper management. Are we to be forced from our homes because of commercial development? I live on the north side of Highway 36 on Castle Avenue and I am within the 350 -foot rule as measured along Castle Ave., only directly across the highway. I WAS NOT NOTIFIED of the proposal and only found out about it today. This short notice did not give me adequate time to prepare to have my objections in by October 28. The area directly west of the proposed site is vacant - were those living further west and next to the Nursing Home notified? For progress to take place in our City, proper management of each proposal is required to insure that it is an asset to Maplewood. Present zoning and land -use plans should not be altered to the disadvantage of the local residents. It was a mistake to go from R1 to the present M1 - Business Warehouse plan. Does a topper sales fit the definition of a warehouse and is it an asset to Maplewood? All open and undeveloped parcels should be scrutinized to fit within the life styles of the local residents. In other words, undeveloped areas should be pre- designated as to the type of development allowed. Let's not make a second mistake! 11 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota in the council chambers in said city on the , 1988 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: regular meeting of the was duly called and held day of WHEREAS, Leer, Incorporated initiated a conditional use permit to develop a truck-topper sales lot within 350 feet of a residence district at the following-described property: Lots 23, 24, 25 26 or Block 6 of Dearborn Park and Lots 5, 6 7 8 of Block 11 of Dearborn Park, and the portions of vacated Sherren Avenue and of the North Half of the vacated alley in Block 11, adjacent thereto according to the plat thereof on file in the, office of the Ramsey County Recorder, WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1° This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on February 29, 1988" The planning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be 2" The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on v 1988 " Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements" The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission" NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOO CITY COUNCIL THAT the above-described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings-o+^~fact: 1" The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2" The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3~ The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district" 4" The use would not depreciate property values" 12 Attachment 6 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust odor, fumes, water pollution, water run-off, vibration general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6" The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic con9estion unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7° The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks" . 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city" 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design" 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects" Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1° Adherence to the site plan approved by the city's community design review board" 2" No grading, paving or building permits shall be issued until construction contracts have been signed for a new storm sewer system and extension of public water to the site with a hydrant" Adopted this day of v 1988. Seconded by Ayes-- STATE OF MINNESOTA } ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS" ) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 198 , with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permit. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1988° City Clerk City of Maplewood 13 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 1988, 7:00 P.M. 1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B. MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Moe called the meeting to order aV 7:00 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Donal Moe Tom Dea s Bob Pete on Jim Kochsi Earl Marlow Marvin Erick III. APPROVAL OF MIN Board Member Ericks 1987, as submitted. Board Member Deans IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Present Present Absent Absent Present Present . approval of the minutes of December 22, Ayes - -all Board Member De s moved approv 1 of the agenda as submitted. Board Member rlow seconded Ayes - -all V. UNFINISHED SINESS A. Tim Extension - Health Resources mporary Sales Office /Model Unit The ap licant was not present. Staff recom ended approval of a six- nth time extension since there have be no problems associated wit this structure. F7 Member Marlow moved approval of a six -month time extension or the temporary rental office /model unit at Haze Ridge, unless a time extension is granted by the review board. Board Member Deans seconded Ayes - -all VI. DESIGN REVIEW A. Site Plan Review - Truck Topper Sales Lot Roger Rosenberg, the general sales manager for Leer, Inc., presented the proposal and discussed the staff recommendation with the board. Mr. Rosenberg had concerns with Condition Two, which required that construction not take place until a storm sewer improvement project is ordered by the city council and a construction contract is signed. 14 Attachment 7 Community Design Review - 2 - Board Minutes of 2 -9 -88 Staff explained that the council will review this proposal because of the conditional use permit requirement. If the applicant has any feasible alternatives for drainage control, the council can give them consideration. Board Member Marlow moved: Approval of the site plan concept for Leer, Inc. for a truck - topper sales lot on the south side of Castle Avenue, subject to: 1. Granting of a conditional use permit for this use by the city council. 2. Construction shall not take place until a storm sewer improve- ment project is ordered by the city council and a construction contract is signed. 3. The required fire flow shall be provided as required by state code to provide fire protection, subject to the approval of the Maplewood Fire Marshal. 4. Approval of plans by the Community Design Review Board does not constitute approval of a building permit. 5. All trash dumpsters shall be stored in screening enclosures with a 100% opaque wooden gate and shall be a color and material compatible with the building. Enclosures shall be protected by concrete - filled steel posts, or the equivalent, anchored in the ground at the front corners of the structure. If the enclosure is masonry, the protective posts may be omitted. 6. The site plan shall be revised for board approval to provide: a. Setbacks: front - 15 feet west side - 5 feet east side - 20 feet b. A bituminous parking lot having a 24- foot -wide driveway and at least three parking stalls (one being a handicap parking stall). C. Landscaping to soften and screen (not intended to hide) the topper racks on the east, west and front. d. An alternative to grass for the sales /storage yard that would not be an eyesore. e. Screening for any materials stored outside. 15 Community Design Review - 3 - Board Minutes of 2 -9 -88 7. Any exterior building or roof -top equipment shall be decoratively screened and hidden from view. 8. An erosion - control plan, acceptable to the city engineer,' shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit for erosion control during construction. 9. Parking areas shall be striped. Parking lots shall be kept in a continual state of repair. 10. If construction has not begun within two years of approval, board review shall be repeated. 11. Site security lighting shall be provided and shall be directed or shielded so not to cause any undue glare onto adjacent properties or roadways. 12. If any adjacent property is disturbed or property irons removed due to construction of the site, that property shall be restored and irons replaced by the applicant. 13. Grading, drainage and utility plans shall be subject to the city engineer's approval. 14. All required landscape areas shall be continually and properly maintained. 15. All required plantmaterials that die shall be replaced by the owner within one year. 16. Reflectorized stop signs and handicap parking signs shall be provided. 17. All public boulevard that is disturbed due to this construction shall be restored and resodded. 18. The applicant shall provide a monetary guarantee, in a form acceptable to staff, in the amount of 1507 of the estimated cost of any site improvements that are not completed by occupancy. 19. Barbed wire is prohibited. 20. The building's address shall be clearly posted, subject to the approval of the fire marshal. Board Member Deans seconded Ayes - -all 16 Planning Commission Minutes 2~29~^88 -3~ Seconded by Commissidner 1 etten Ayes--Amdahl, Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal,, Dempsey, Fio1a Fischer, Larson, / \ Si9mundik, Sletten B. Conditional Use Permit: Castle Ave, (Leer, Inc") Ted Meyer of Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly was present and said Leer, Inc., was interested in pursuing the truck topper sales business on this property, if they can get approval. He discussed with the commissioners the issue of the storm-water runoff control" Roger Anitzberger, 1949 Castle Avenue, spoke in opposition to the request" Dick Nord of Hillcrest Development said he would like to proceed with the project with approval contingent on a grading plan which would not add additional water to the problem, until the drainage problems with the adjacent property can be resolved. Commissioner Larson moved approval of a conditional use permit for truck topper sales" Commissioner Sigmundik seconded Ayes~~Axdahl, Ayers, Barrett, Dempsey, Fiola Goins, Larson, Sigmundik Nays--Cardinal v Fischer, Sletten The commissioners voting nay were in favor submitting a drainage plan agreeable to th tabling this request until the feasibility sewer is completed" C" Preliminary Plat Str Vacation and , of the applicant � city engineer or study for the storm Rezoning: Hennen Lawrence Hamstead ering, was present for Hennen Development" He b stoff recommendation for Outlot B and said wants to he reimbursed for costs on streets \Jc He was concerned r egardin9 Items 1~f. and 9, d a variance" He also objected to Item 1-i which ds to the abutting property owner. He felt t It2> was not necessary and 1-1 .(3) was the city/s re onsibility. He also said there was not a need for a tempor�ry Hillwood Drive cul-de-sac. Action by CouncIN MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Randall Johnson--Associate Planner SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat, Street Vacation and LOCATION: Hillwood Drive, West of Dorland Road APPLICANT: Hennen Development, Inc. OWNER: Betty Severance and Kenneth Benson PROJECT: Hennen Hillwood Court Addition DATE: February 9, 1988 SUMMARY Intradgctioa Endorse Modified-_ Bejeotod~~~_~~°~� `n Date Rezoning (F to R-1) 1° The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval to subdivide two parcels into 20 single-dwelling lots and three outlots^ (Refer to the map on page 15") 2. The applicant is also requesting the vacation of the excess right- a+-way used to construct a temporary cul-de-sac on Hillwood Drive" The vacated right-of-way would be restored to front yard area" 3" City staff is proposing a rezoning from F, farm to R~^1 single dwelling. This is needed to prohibit F farm-related nuisances, such as the raising of livestock, in this single-dwelling neighborhood. QomnpnQ There are three issues of significance The first is unless Hillwood " v s woo Drive is constructed through to McKnight Road, the proposed cul-de-sac (Hillwood Court) will exceed the maximum allowable length of 1 feet" The applicant will be petitioning for the construction of this road. He has also agreed to shorten the cul-de-sac to create a lot between the bulb of the cul-de-sac and Lot Twelve, as shown on page 16" The second issue is the grading plan shows unnecessary grading that will result in the loss of healthy oak trees. The environmental protection ordinance restricts grading to the minimum necessary. A revised grading plan, which identifies the proposed building pad locations and the style of each dwelling, is needed to resolve this concern. Third, the applicant is proposing a reservation strip (Outlot B) west of cul-de-sac bulb" He wants to retain control of this property until the property owner to the west compensates him for constructing the public improvements needed to create two lots. Code does not permit reservation strips" This issue must be resolved at the time of platting. (Refer to Condition C of the plat recommendations on page 2.) 1. Approve the Hennen Hillwood Court Addition preliminary plat (plans dated 11-25-87), subject to satisfaction of the following conditions before final approval : a" The construction of Hillwood Drive through to McKnight Road is guaranteed or the development is phased so that a temporary cul-de- sac does not exceed 1,000 feet of length from the west line of the westerly driveway south of Hillwood Drive that accesses the townhouse property. If the development will be phased, an easement shall be granted for a 100-foot diameter temporary cul-de-sac. b" The bulb of the cul-de-sac shall be shifted to the south to create a lot south of Lot Twelve (2320 Mailand Road) as shown on the revised plat concept on page 16. The cul-de-sac bulb shall be located so that adequate area is provided to create two lots on the property to the west. These lots shall conform with minimum dimension requirements" A scaled plan for these lots shall be submitted. This plan shall include the surveyed location of the south wall of the dwelling at 2310 Mailand Road" C. A deed to convey Outlot B to the city. A restriction shall be recorded against the title stating that this outlot may not he used for access to the cul-de-sac or transferred to another ownership until a fair reimbursement of costs for street, water and sewer is made to the city" The city council shall determine what a fair reimbursement is" The city shall then attempt to reimburse this money to the developer" If the developer cannot be located, the city shall retain this money. d. Provide evidence that the boundary between this property and 2310 Mailand Road (north line of proposed Lot Eight) is 459+ feet south of center line of Mailand Road rather than 480 feet, as shown on Ramsey County's section map" If the section map is correct, Lots One~^EighL Block Two shall be revised accordingly" Lot One shall not be reduced in area unless a site plan is submitted for the lot showing that an adequate rear setback will be provided. e" The dedication of right-of-way for Mailand Road, across the north part of Lots Eleven and Twelve, shall be reduced from 40 to 33 feet. f. Land survey evidence shall be submitted to show that the proposed east line of Lot Twelve will be at least five feet east of the garage to be retained on this lot, 9" Show a thirty-foot~wide utility the cul-de-sac to Mailand Road, as concept on page 17^ The garage on upon this easement. easement (for water mai '> from shown on the revised plat Lot Twelve shall not encroach 2 h" A recordable deed shall be submitted to the city engineer to transfer title for Outlot A and C to the city. i" A recordable deed to transfer title for Outlot C to the property owners abutting to the south shall be in the possession of that property owner" A copy of this deed shall be submitted to the city. j^ Rename "Hillwood Court" to xDorland Road"" k. Approval of final grading, utility, erosion control and drainage plans by the city engineer" (1) The grading plan shall include the location of the proposed building pads and the style of each proposed dwelling (walkout, split~entry etc.). The proposed house styles and locations and street plans shall provide for, or be revised to show: (a) an undisturbed fifteen-foot-wide strip along the east and west plat boundaries and (b) the removal of as few healthy, mature trees as possible to construct necessary public improvements, dwellings and driveways. Future revisions to the approved grading plan may be authorized by the city engineer, provided the intent of the overall grading plan is not compromised, (2) Each mature tree to be saved shall be shown on the grading plan" These trees shall also be identified on the site. 1. Submittal of a signed developer's agreement with the required surety. This agreement shall address, but not be limited to: (1) Construction of all required on-site public improvements" (2) Removal of the temporary cul-de-sac for Hillwood Drive, construction of a permanent Hillwood Drive street section (curb, gutter, etc") and restoration of the temporary cul-de- sac area outside of the permanent street section to an acceptable grade with grass, (3) Construction of Hillwood Drive at least thirty feet west of the southwesterly extension of the East line of Lot One, Block Two" (4) Replanting of trees, as necessary, so that at least 66 (2-inch plus new or 4-inch plus diameter existing) trees are located on the site following all construction. Trees may be relocated to the berm on Outlot A (city pond) subject to the location being approved by the city engineer. M. The owner(s) of this property shall release, by deed, any right that may run with this property to use the 33- foot-wide access easement that abuts the northwest corner. 3 2. Approve the resolution on page 22 to vacate the right -of -way dedicated for the temporary Hillwood Drive cul -de -sac. The resolution shall not be sent to the county to be recorded until the preliminary plat conditions are met. 3. Approve the resolution on page 24 to rezone the site from F, farm residence to R -1, single dwelling. 4 CITIZEN COMMENTS Fifty -seven property owners within 350 feet of this site were asked their opinion of this proposal. Of.the 26 respondents, sir, are in favor, two have no comment and eighteen are opposed. A letter from one of the= opposed respondents is attached (see page 17). Those opposed raised the following concerns; 1. An incredible wildlife habitat would be lost. The area should be left as is or purchased for a park or open space. If the developement is approved, we will no longer see it fit to continue living in Maplewood and we will do our best to vote against any elected official who supports this project or any other project that destroys wooded areas and open space. I (517 Lakewood Drive) paid :1,500 extra for my lot so that I could be adjacent to the woods, to look at the beauty of the trees; to hear the birds singing in these trees and to observe the wildlife. Now, all that I hold dear and treasure will be gone if homes are built there. Staff reply: This property has been planned for residential development since the city has been incorporated. If land is not purchased for park and it is not planned to be, it must be permitted to develop as planned and zoned, which in this case is low density residential use. Develop- ment will, however, be subject to the provisions of the city's environ- mental protection ordinance. This ordinance restricts grading to the minimum necessary. It also requires a specified number of trees to be retained on the site or replanted, if removed. A condition of approval will be to minimize grading and tree loss along the boundaries of the site. In 1974, council denied a plat for the subdivision to the east (Crestwood Knolls) for reasons including excessive density, excessive street area and excessive grading that would result in the destruction of natural slopes, trees, etc. The city was overruled by District Court 4 - And ordered to approve the development because it complied with the city's subdivision code. This proposal will have less environmental impact than the Crestwood Knolls development. 2. If development must occur, the lots should be larger. Staff reply: The city cannot require lots to be larger than the minimum required 10,000 square feet. The proposed lots will average about 13,024 square feet. The majority of the lots in the subdivision to the east have the minimum required 10,000 square feet of area. 3. Traffic will increase substantially through our quiet neighborhood. 15 Staff reply: Hillwood Drive will eventually be constructed through to McKnight Road to function as a planned minor collector street (See page 11)• Once the connection is made to McKnight Road, Hillwood Drive will handle some of the traffic presently using Mailand Road and Linwood Avenues to travel to and from the neighborhoods to the east. 4. I (561 Lakewood Drive) am concerned about drainage. Staff reply: This site generally drains to the west and south. Once developed, a substantial portion of this site will drain to the proposed street and to the storm water pond in the southeast corner of the site. 5. Insufficient data was provided about the type, price range and builders to be involved. Staff reply: Only single dwellings are proposed. At this time, the applicant is proposing to build the dwellings. The city cannot regulate the price of dwellings other than requiring all dwellings to comply with minimum floor area requirements. The applicant is proposing a price range of about $125,000 to $150,000. 6. This area is growing far too rapidly. With only a volunteer fire department to protect our community, we are greatly increasing the risk to all of our homes one after the other as new development is built. The rapid growth and over development are also causing a burden on our sewer and school systems. Staff reply: In 1981, a fire station was constructed at Lower Afton Road and Londin Lane to serve this area. This station is manned by 16 persons. A 40± man station at Stillwater Road and Century Avenue is the primary backup. Two stations in Woodbury can also be called upon for assistance. The construction of a water tower to serve this area has also been approved to insure adequate fire flows. Further, the city's contract with the fire department states that it is the responsibility of the fire department to take whatever measures are necessary to guarantee that at least four fire fighters will respond in a timely manner to each call. The trunk sewer system has been sized to handle the planned land uses in the area. In this case, this property was assumed to eventually develop as now being proposed. The school district and city communicate regularly about developing residential properties and the pace at which development is anticipated. In response, the school district is negotiating to purchase a new elementary school site half way between McKnight Road and Century Avenue, north of Highwood Avenue. It is also conducting a facilities study which is designed to address the needs of the students that will live in this area. C REFERENCE Site Qescription Gross area: 8^42 acres Existing land use: undeveloped Easements: A 33-foot wide private driveway easement runs from Mailand Road to the northwest corner of the site. Surrounding Land Uses North: Mailand Road" Across the street are multiple dwellings and Dorland Road. East: Single dwellings South. Hillwood Drive. Across the street are town houses" West: Three single-dwelling properties unimproved Hillwood Drive right- of-way and two undeveloped tracts, planned for low density residential use" Past Actions This site and adjacent property: 4-15-82: A lot division was approved for the property to the northwest of this site (page 13). The potential of serving the applicant's site with a through-street from Mailand Road was eliminated with this lot split and subsequent construction on Parcel One" 4-26~82: A lot division was approved for this site which would have created a lot similar in configuration to Lot One, Block Two of the applicant's proposed plat. The difference between the two proposals is that Hillwood Drive right-of-way was not dedicated to the west until April 1987" 3~23-87: Council approved the South Oaks 2nd Addition final plat" When this plat was recorded on April 10, 1987, right-o+-way for Hillwood Drive to the west of the applicant's site was dedicated (Page ]y)" Other property: 6-8-87: Council approved 8onyea/s Oak Heights preliminary plat (Boxwood Avenue and McKnight Road). A condition of approval was that Snowshoe Lane had to be restricted to 1,000 feet of length until construction of a through-street connection to Hi9hwood Avenue was guaranteed. Environmental SUMMa CY- The site is heavily wooded. The applicant estimates there are at least 60 trees/acre. (See the letter on page 20") The majority of the site 7 is covered by mature oat: trees. The northerly one -third of the site is covered by a dense stand of evergreen trees. There are no steep slopes or wetlands other than the city's storm water pond, located on proposed Outlot A. En vironmental Regu lations, Section 9 -192 (5) of the Environmental Protection Ordinances requires: "1. Development shall be designed to preserve the maximum number of healthy trees. This requirement shall not apply to diseased trees or where a forester certifies that thinning is needed for the overall health of a woodlot; in which case, a specific tree removal plan must be approved by the city. "(Comment: The grading plan shows the removal of nearly all of the trees west of the proposed street and along the east side of the cul -de- sac. A detailed grading plan with house pads and style of dwelling should be submitted that illustrates a minimum amount of grading.) "2. If trees are cut, the density of trees shall be restored to that which existed before development, but in no case shall the applicant be required to raise the density above ten (10) trees per acre, unless part of a required planting screen. Any trees required to be planted shall be varied in species, shall maximize the use of species native to the area, shall not include any species under disease epidemic and shall be hardy under local conditions. Tree diameters shall be at least two (2) inches. "(Comment: A minimum of 66 mature trees must be retained or replanted.) "3. The applicant shall demonstrate that all grading which takes place will be conducted in a manner that preserves the root - zone areation and stability of existing trees and provides an adequate watering are equal to at least one -half (1/2) of each tree's crown cover." Plannin 1. Land use plan designation: RL, residential low density 2. Zoning: F, farm residence 3. Permitted density. 14 people /acre 4. Proposed density: 12.4 people /net acre 5. Compliance with land use laws: State taw: Chapter 412.551 of state law states that "the council may, by resolution, vacate any street, alley, public grounds,.publir_ way, or any part thereof, on its own motion or on petition of a majority of the owners of land abutting on the street, alley, public grounds, public way, or part thereof to be vacated. When there has been no petition, the resolution may be adopted only by a vote of four - fifths of all members of the council. No such vacation shall be made unless it appears in the interest of the public to do so after a hearing preceded by two weeks published and posted notice." City code: a. Section 30 -8 b (4) states "privately owned reserve strips controlling access to streets are prohibited. Publicly owned reserve strips may be required by the city council, where necessary to assure equitable payment for streets." (Comment: Proposed OUtlOt B would be a reserve strip.) b. Section 30 -8 (3) states that cul -de -sacs when used, shall be held to as short of a distance as possible between the origin and the end of the cul -de -sac. In no case shall cul -de -sacs exceed 1,000 feet of length, unless no other alternative is possible. (Comment: The applicant's proposal (page 151 is for a permanent 1,015 -foot long cul -de -sac. The revised plan on page 16 would create a permanent 938 -foot+ long cul -de -sac. Both would exceed 1,000 feet until Hillwood Drive is extended through to McKnight Road (1,155 and 1,075 feet, respectively). C. Section 30 -8 (f) (6) states "double- frontage lots shall not be permitted, except where topographic or other conditions render subdividing otherwise unreasonable." (Comment: If Outlot B were permitted to be created as proposed, Lot Twelve, Block One would essentially become a double- fronting lot. There would be little opportunity to capture any future assessment(s) levied against the northerly portion of Outlot B.) The applicant has agreed to the revised concept plan shown on page 16 to address the concerns pointed out in Comments B and C above. d. Section 36 -485 requires four findings for the approval of a rezoning. Refer to the resolution on page 24. Pu bl is Works 1. Sewer and water services have been stubbed to the property south of Outlot C. 2. Water main needs to be looped to Mailand Road to provide adequate area fire flows and to provide adequate capacity to transport water between the booster station of Mailand and McKnight Roads and the proposed elevated tower to the southeast. 3. The temporary cul -de -sac for Hillwood Drive should be eliminated as a condition of the plat whether or not Hillwood Drive is constructed through to McKnight Road. 0 If Hillwood Drive will not be constructed through to McKnight Road, the street should be constructed at least 30 feet west of the southwesterly extension of the east line of Lot One, Block Two. This thirty feet, together with the proposed cul -de -sac within the plat, are needed to provide adequate turn -round facilities until a through street is constructed. 4. The existing ponding easement should not be altered to move proposed Hillwood Court to the east to create a conventional corner lot. If this were to occur, the intersection would be in the middle of a curve which is less safe than the proposed location. Street construction partially over a filled pond area could also result in a long -term street creating problems. mb Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. 1952 Lot Division -- property to the northwest 4. Previous unrecorded division of this site. 5. Preliminary plat (S 1/2 x 11) 6. Preliminary Plat as proposed for revision by staff (8 1/2 r. 11) 7A - 7C Letters from neighboring property owners S. Letter from the applicant's engineer 9. Resolution (street vacation) 10. Resolution (rezoning) 11. Preliminary Plat (separate enclosure) Ito] Lowe Lon( T r a 0 0 0 VISTA HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN 11. Attachment 1 nN ' ELA#B Ro qo ( 2 5 3' 101 'r Ioi.+b }, 13&-t .93a - M � W I < N 5kx' cc 2310 <# ! + (47) ml k 5 m I I U m. pf = jl � 1 6 � 2 a Future Street.a, Construction 2 W WAI-m Oro I S4 ki P 6 7 L 487 z 495 125" (s) Fq 503 0 3 h ) 3; 511 m 4 o h) E2 ' W a L_ 517 ;) o its Fl ° (s) e 525 I zs O 6) 533 ,1° O � 1� 539 p +Ver LJ ) d V1 os) 547 a 12 J � o LL ■ 9 ` -- 553 rl a TG 2 1 12 se � I 61 2 � 3 �6T) -125 3(6°) I T 0 Z I T 3 (94) J a 1 LINWOO PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 12 nt 2 oA) 2300 I LJ oz x4s.ol t sa I �i 010 F I 1 2290 I 4 3 0 N r � L 1 1 , ii 2 y 1 I U m. pf = jl � 1 6 � 2 a Future Street.a, Construction 2 W WAI-m Oro I S4 ki P 6 7 L 487 z 495 125" (s) Fq 503 0 3 h ) 3; 511 m 4 o h) E2 ' W a L_ 517 ;) o its Fl ° (s) e 525 I zs O 6) 533 ,1° O � 1� 539 p +Ver LJ ) d V1 os) 547 a 12 J � o LL ■ 9 ` -- 553 rl a TG 2 1 12 se � I 61 2 � 3 �6T) -125 3(6°) I T 0 Z I T 3 (94) J a 1 LINWOO PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 12 nt 2 oA) 2300 I LJ oz x4s.ol t sa I �i 010 F I 1 2290 I 4 3 0 N PROPERTY LINE MAP (Lot Division approved 4- 15 -82) 1 3 Attachment 3 I � � M A I L A N_V `o- - -.— - ----o I PARCEL 2 ( PARCEL 1 ozo I 090 I� v) 2340 I> zS3 I I� O I of � 11 I'I• • Y • I I I I I i O_ _ 030 — O 53 p Q 3 � IW � YY PARCEL 3 I, I# li HILLWOOD q% POND I Ac. - Ff. (Note: Prior to _ r _ approving this lot division, �. staff met with all of the adjoin- ing property I� owners. Each of I these persons was opposed to any future street in the vicinity of the east line of Parcel One.) 0 NO O WO I o N 0 Um NO PARCEL 1 0 UJ NO PARCEL 2. „` /° FUTURE ` . This right -of -way had not been dedicated 0 O UW AO Measurements are approximate OAKR /L I 4 I N I W I r z CC N N N G N — Ati — W N N \ \ 9 �Y w N W W a O N C 4 W r 0 U 0 1 UO J � PROPERTY LINE MAP (Approved 4- 27 -82. A deed was never recorded to complete the lot split.) Attachment 4 /y 0 N r n x m 0 0 ° o b TEAKWOOD O � H � W m Y � O p � In PARCEL 1 0 UJ NO PARCEL 2. „` /° FUTURE ` . This right -of -way had not been dedicated 0 O UW AO Measurements are approximate OAKR /L I 4 I N I W I r z CC N N N G N — Ati — W N N \ \ 9 �Y w N W W a O N C 4 W r 0 U 0 1 UO J � PROPERTY LINE MAP (Approved 4- 27 -82. A deed was never recorded to complete the lot split.) Attachment 4 /y 0 PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT 1 5 Attachment 5 4 Outlot B 30-foot wide �1 I C utility easement a ��I IM Cul -de -sac length Before Hillwood Drive is through to McKnight Road 1075 +feet After Hillwood Drive connects with McKnight Road 935 +feet. II nx•�7 I , E A • I e F, F___!_..1 I 1 'I(Cul -de -sac moved south 80+ feet) /I1M' 1 1 i C 1� I MFe. • 3 a MlM'. UH � 1.ij1 Jl.xe ! i I OUTLOT A a r.,..•.,. PREL IMINARY PLAT AS PROPOSED FOR REVISION'BY CITY STAFF 16 Attachment 6 I - 1 N I � vtnJ'1 pC — A UH � 1.ij1 Jl.xe ! i I OUTLOT A a r.,..•.,. PREL IMINARY PLAT AS PROPOSED FOR REVISION'BY CITY STAFF 16 Attachment 6 I - 1 N 1?1�5Aw521 i A& /-� (2 10 1 -r ✓/ UcC1l G �� f� c c LrG �jLC/ 2 y 9c ` � / zizaGza��, ���rr� 1 1q �� - 4 ) / /G�Ci & �—/ �� � 739 -�- 1 Attachment 7A 0 /favNEN // /a woov cocker dfM17101IJ ,�,eaz 1�1.e • O /aon. ar cs"6 7 a a�euvoaz�/ h99�va .. � r -rte-, 4�irn ��- �y�ir�uz, �zol �u/.o� Dui _41� 13A anW Lviol In Attachment 7B ��C�°ce rrvf ore a - cc #rftu 4 y �� e t�fQO I 40 4 d. w w`o �S � 0 h.ovf IVL2A tk� P�&f 7 de" i Mr.Jon W.Fundingsland 525 Lakewood Drive Maplewood, Minnesota 55119 19 Attachment 7C 9/0'I V`�2 V �/tJ5 f 5 � ✓to�2 ��o'<.e d-or Z. I�'laf or S(�" -� � d G`lv�cy / r v25v /� ��r f dlie laQ Goy (6 CP/XA� d9r'0p,-;'I� //I g � e-ee `zz C" s ! r.�Q,( / rIf c� I r f �— ` h r(fuoa Cc L.., r+ s, C�rVs Q K,tio�ls d'kc5 w m�(cQ rof� bode �, f-I V-O--C - a P w i wC"� V . ��C�°ce rrvf ore a - cc #rftu 4 y �� e t�fQO I 40 4 d. w w`o �S � 0 h.ovf IVL2A tk� P�&f 7 de" i Mr.Jon W.Fundingsland 525 Lakewood Drive Maplewood, Minnesota 55119 19 Attachment 7C er 15, 1987 � zl'a7 ENGI1VEE1RINGi,=3ma- SUITE 145 - 1221 FOURTH AVENUE EAST SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 612- 445.7993 Mr. Randy Johnson, Planner City of Maplewood 13890 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: Hennen Hillwood Court Addition Subject: Tree Count and Tree Maintenance Dear Mr. Johnson: After reviewing with you the regulations of Maplewood regarding tree Maintenance on new subdivisions and review of the site of Hennen Hillwood Court Addition, I find the following. On Lots 10, 11 and 12, Block 1 (Total 1 Acre) - 60 trees. On Outlot A, (pond area approx. 1/2 acre) - No trees. On all other Lots and Street (Hillwood Court) - In excess of 60 trees /acre (all sizes), and an excess of 20 trees /acre (4 or larger). With a tree count of over 60 /acre, I stopped counting. This last area is a mature forest with smaller saplings over the entire acreage. I I �5 With the minimum of 10 tra-ds /acre to be left after final development, I know that on 46es-t 10, 11, and 12, only 6 to 10 trees will be disturbed. This will leave 50 trees and provide the minimum stand for 5 acres. Even at the gross area of 8 1/2 acres, only 35 trees would need to be retained. This would be about 2 per lot excluding Outlot A. For tree retention and maintenance I propose the following: (1) minimum clearance of trees along Hillwood Court, i.e. only enough to facilitate street and utility installation, (2) minimum clearance of trees for buildings (homes) and driveways only with some extra grading in part of Block 2 to maintain proper grades around each house. Assuming the houses to take one half the lot area, and 4 lots /acre, then one half of the trees will remain 20 Attachment 8 Mr. Randy Johnson, City of Maplewood -2- Dec. 15, 1987 Re: Hennen Hillwood Ct. Addn. providing a net 10 trees /acre. This will necessitate 2+ trees to remain on each lot. To maintain density of only 2 to 3 trees per lot would therefore be required and certainly from the count and review of the locations of the trees, this will not be difficult even if some trees are found to be diseased. Maintenance of the 10 trees /acre requirement is well within the intent and scope of the proposed project. One question remains for the City to decide. Since Mr. Hennen may move certain good trees from the proposed street, possibly you may wish to have some of those replanted on the berms of the pond presently on Outlot A. If so, please let us know. The balance of the moved trees may be used either on the site or moved to another location. If you have further questions please write or call. Sincerely, ITASCA ENGINEERING,Inc. Lawrence E. Samstad, P.E. Minn. Reg No. 6220 LS /hz cc: Mr. Bob Hennen Mr. Del Schwanz Mr. Don Campbell 21 Pursuant to due tali and notice thereof, a City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota held in the council chambers in said city on the 1988 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: regular meeting of the was duly tailed and day of , WHEREAS, Hennen Development, Inc. initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following- described property: That part of the following temporary cul -de -sac on Hillwood Drive located within a 55 -foot radius of the following- described point: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4, thence on an assumed bearing to the South 88 45'35" West, along the South line of said NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4, a distance of 632.48 feet; thence Westerly and Northwesterly a distance of 148.03 feet along a tangential curve concave to the North having a radius of 275 feet and a central angle of 30 50 to the point being defined. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. A majority of the owners of property abutting said street right -of -way have signed a petition for this vacation; 2. This vacation was reviewed by the planning commission on , 1988. The planning commission recommended to the city council that this vacation be 3. The city council held a public hearing on , 1988 to consider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above- described street right -of- way, public interest in the property will accrue to the following - described abutting properties: 1. The East 10 acres of the West 25 acres of theNW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 12, Township 28, Range 22, except the North 4801 feet thereof and except the East 200 feet of the South 391 feet of the North 871 feet thereof. 2. Outlot C, Linwood Heights. 22 Attachment 9 3. North 125 feet of the East 12C) feet of the West 550 of the SW 1 /4of the SW 1/4 in Section 12, Township 28, Range 22, subject to easements. WHEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood City Council that it is in the public interest to grant the above - described vacation on the basis that this temporary cul -de -sac will be replaced by a permanent through- street section. Adopted this day of , 1988. Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of 198 with the original on file in my office and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to vacation of this temporary cul -de -sac right -of -way. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 198 . City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 23 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota held in the council chambers in said city on the , 1988 at 7 p.m. The following members were presents The following members were absent: regular meeting of the was duly called and day of WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F, farm residence to R -1, single dwelling for the following - described property: The east 10 acres of the west 25 acres of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 28 Range 22, except the East 200 feet of the South 391 feet of the North 871 feet thereof. And the East 200 feet of the North 871 feet of the West 25 acres of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 28, Range 22, all in Ramsey County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on February , 1988. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on , 1988 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent.of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 24 Attachment 10 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. 5. Approval would prohibit any form related nuisance use, such as the raising of livestock, from being carried on in this single - dwelling neighborhood. Adopted this day of , 1988. Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of , 1988 with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this rezoning. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1988. City Clerk City of Maplewood 25 Planning Commission -3~ Minutes 2-29-88 Seconded by oner Sletten Ayes^~^~Axdahl Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal, Dempsey, Kola, Fis Larson, Si9 k, Sletten B. Conditional U�� Permit: Castle Ave~ (/r, Inc") Ted Meyer of Oppenhe Wolff & Don ll Leer, Inc", was inter d in pursui business on this prope � if they c t discussed with the com sioners the sue runoff control ^ l // 'as present and said truck topper sales approval" He of the storm-water Roger Anitzberger, 1949 C tle A e, spoke in opposition to the request. \ // Dick Nord of Hillcrest Dev nt said he would like to proceed with the project w N contingent on a grading plan which would not add a onal water to the problem, until the drainage problems with Y hO adjacent property can be resolved. / \ Commissioner Larson move appro I of a conditional use permit for truck topper sales"� \ Commissioner Sigmu seconded Ayes--Axdahl Ayers, Barrett, Dempsey, Fiola Goins, Larson, // \ Sigmundik Nays-^~Cardinal, Fischer, Sletten The commissio rs voting nay were in fa submittin ainage plan agreeable to tabling t request until the feasibilitA sewer is cphpleted. C" Preliminary Plat, Street Vacation and Hillwood Court Addition of the applicant ? city engineer or study for the storm Rezoning: Hennen Lawrence Hamstead, Itaska Engineering, was present for Hennen Development" He obilected to the staff recommendation for Outlot B and said the applicant wants to be reimbursed for costs on streets and utilities. He was concerned regarding Items 1-f. and 9. would require a variance" He also objected to Item 1-^i which deeds Outlot C to the abutting property owner" He felt that Item 1-1^(2) was not necessary and 1-1.(3) was the city's responsibility. He also said there was not a need for a temporary Hillwood Drive cul-de-sac. Planning Commission �4-~ Minutes 2-29~88 Commissioner Fischer moved the planning commission: 1^ Approve the Hennen Hillwood Court Addition preliminary plat, subject to satisfaction of the following conditions before final approval: a" The construction of Hillwood Drive through to McKnight Road is guaranteed or the development is phased so that a temporary cul -de sac does not exceed 1 000 feet of length from the west line of the westerly driveway, south of Hillwood Drive that accesses the townhouse property. If the development will be phased an easement shall be granted for a 100-foot diameter temporary cul-de-sac. b" The bulb of the cul-de-sac shall be shifted to the south to create a lot south of Lot Twelve (2320 Mailand Road) as shown on the revised plat concept" The cul-de- sac bulb shall be located so that adequate area is provided to create two lots on the property to the west. These lots shall conform with minimum dimension requirements. A scaled plan for these lots shall be submitted. This plan shall include the surveyed location of the south wall of the dwelling at 2310 Mailand Road, C. A deed to convey Outlot B to the city. A restriction shall be recorded against the title stating that this outlot may not be used for access to the cul-de-sac or transferred to another ownership until a fair reimbursement of costs for street, water and sewer is made to the city" The city council shall determine what a fair reimbursement is. The city shall then attempt to reimburse this money to the developer" If the developer cannot be located, the city shall retain this money. d^ Provide evidence that the boundary between this property and 2310 Mailand Road (north line of proposed Lot Eight) is 459+ feet south of center line of Mailand Road rather than 480 feet, as shown on Ramsey County's section map. If the section map is correct, Lots One-Eight, Block Two shall he revised accordingly. Lot One shall not be reduced in area unless a site plan is submitted for the lot showing that an adequate rear setback will be provided" , e" The dedication of right-of-way for Mailand Road, across the north part of Lots Eleven and Twelve, shall be reduced from 40 to 33 feet. f" Land survey evidence shall be submitted to show that the proposed east line of Lot Twelve will be at least five feet east of the garage to be retained on this lot" ~ Planning Commission ~5- Minutes 2-29-88 g^ Show a thirty-foot-wide utility *�asement (for water main) from the cul-de-sac to Mailand load, as shown on the revised plat concept" The garage on Lot Twelve shall not encroach upon this easement" h" A recordable deed shall be submitted to the city engineer to transfer title for Outlot A & C to the city" i" Rename ''Hillwood Court" to "Dorland Roadn" j" Approval of final grading, ut erosion control and drainage plans by the city engineer. (1) The grading plan shall include the location of the proposed building pads and the style of each proposed dwelling (walhout split-entry, etc.). The proposed house styles and locations and street plans shall provide for, or be revised to show: (a) an undisturbed fifteen-foot-wide strip along the east and west plat boundaries and (b) the removal of as few healthy, mature trees as possible to construct necessary public improvements dwellings and driveways. Future revisions to the approved grading plan may be authorized by the city engineer, provided the intent of the overall grading plan is not compromised" (2) Each mature tree to be saved shall be shown on the grading plan. These trees shall also be identified on the site. k" Submittal of a signed developer's agreement with the required surety" This agreement shall address but not be limited to: (1) Construction of all required on-site public improvements" (2) Removal of the temporary cul-de-sac for Hillwood Drive, construction of a permanent Hillwood Drive street section (curb, gutter, etc,) and restoration of the temporary cul-de-sac area outside of the permanent street section to an acceptable grade and regulative cover" (3) Construction of Hillwood Drive at least thirty feet west of the southwesterly extension of the east line of Lot One, Block Two, (4) Replanting of trees, as necessary, so that at least 66 (2-inch plus new or 4-inch plus diameter, la Planning Commission ~6- Minutes 2~29~88 existing) trees are located on the site following all construction. Trees may be relocated to the berm on Outlot A (city pond) subject to the location being approved by the city engineer. 1. The owner(s) of this property shall release, by deed, any right that may run with this property to use the 33- foot-wide access easement that abuts the northwest corner. 2. Approve the resolution to vacate the right-of~way dedicated for the temporary Hillwood Drive cul-de-sac. The resolution shall not be sent to the county to be recorded until the preliminary plat conditions are met. 3" Approve the resolution to rezone the site from F, farm residence to R-1, single dwelling. Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes-^~Axdahl, Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal, Dempsey, Fiala, Fischer, Gains, Larson, Sigmundik, Sletten D. I Interchange Secreta Olson gave a p Aentation on the proposed I-494 intercha6ge" IX. UNFINISHErk BUS INESS A. Code Amkndment: R Lot Widthiii Secretary he staff re plan stated the X. COMMISSION PR INS A. Council ruary 8 and XI. STAFF PRESENT ATHNS A. Council Xi\ch 14 1988: B" mational =nference zort and confirmed with commission's intent" 22 1988 Sue Fiala The commi ers discus t the policy would be when more than one issioner is sted in attending the national planning erence^ geve commissioners said longevity is an import consideration° mmissioner Dempsey withdrew his name from consideration in a ending this conference, since Commissioner Fiala has more Niority on the commission" � AGENDA ITEM MEMORANDUM A:t1ou by Ounun1l':i TO: City Manager FROM: Public Works Coordinator Endorsed. SUBJECT, Award of Bid Modified ~~-~~_� DATE: February 17, 1988 Rejected Date On Wednesday, February 10, 1988 bids were received for the painting of the interior of the Cope Avenue water tank. The bids also included repairs to the interior of the tank for those items discovered during the inspection phase of the exterior painting project. Five bids were received, and a tabulation of same is attached for your convenience. The low bid in the amount of $82 is that of Rainbow, Inc", the contractor who painted the exterior of the tank last summer" Based on the city's experience with the low bidder and the recommendation of the consultant, award to the low bidder is recommended. Jc TABULATION OF BIDS Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting o f th Officials designated for a bid opening by the City Council "' f e Maplewood was convened at 11 a"m Wednesday, o The February 10 1988 � purpose of this meeting »e was to receive, -- - ~`' " read aloud bids for the repair and paint` openand publicly the Cope Avenue water tank, painting o� the interior of Present were: LaVerne Nuteson and William Cass Fallowing the reading of the notice of advertisement for bids the following bids were opened and read: v BIDDER BID AMOUNT BID BOND Rainbow , Inc. " $ 2,010^00 5 % JMG C Contracting 88 57 Odland Protective Coatings, Inc" 90,650"00 5% Tenyer Coatings, Inc" 102v500"00 5% Abhe & Bvoboda Inc" 122v140.00 5% Pursuant to prior instruction of the council, the city clerk referred the bids received to the to tabulate city engineer instructing him same and report with his recommendation at the regular city council meeting of February 22, 1988° Meeting adjourned at 11:30 a.m. RESOLUTION FOR AWARD OF BIDS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA that the bid of Rainbow, Inc" in the amount of $82,010 is the ' lowest responsible bid for the repair and painting of the interior of the Cope Avenue water tank v e mayor and th are hereby authorized and directed to enter i and clerk :� said bidder for and on behalf of the cty, into a contract with � MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT/OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: City Manager Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Appeal of Design Review Board Motion Beam Avenue Desoto Associates Office Shores March 7, 1988 ` SUMMARY Action 6y Uuun0lI�| Eodoroo8~.~_~.~.""� ModifioU.~._-.�° Iia3eoto8 ---- °~~^� Date Councilman Anderson is appealing the Community Design Review Board's motion which required this office complex to have brick on the front elevations up to the base of the windows" Councilman Anderson feels that this area is developing into a first-class commercial center and that more extensive use of brick should be applied than was required" One of the goals of the design review ordinance (see page 5) is to assure that commercial buildings in a neighborhood are compatible with each other in design and appearance" Therefore, to uphold the quality building design established in this area, the proposed structures should also be brick on the front and sides. Adopt the staff recommendation requiring brick on the front and end elevations to the eave line" k Attachments: 1" CDRB motion dated March 1, 1988 2. Section 25-70 b"2, 3. Revised staff report dated March 7, 1988 E MINUTEST OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY hESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MARCH 1 1988 CALL TO ORDER I. Chairman Mae called the meeting to order at 7 ;00 p.m. II. ROLL_ CALL Donald Moe Present Tom Means Present Dab Paterson Absent Jim Kochsiek Absent E=arl Marl ow Present Marvin Erickson Present APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. February 9, 19BE_I III_. Board Member Erickson moved approval of the February 9, 1988, minutes as submitted. Board Member Deans seconded Ayes- -all APPROVAL OF AGENDA IV. Board Member Deans moved the agenda be amended changing Item 6 -A to 6-•B and 6B to 6A, since the representative from Woodlynn Heights Townhomes was not yet present. Board Member Erickson seconded Ayes--all UNFINISHED BUSINESS V. DESIGN REVIEW VI. A. Plan Review - Office Shores Desoto Associates Richard Schreier, 2125 Desoto Avenue, discussed the project with the board members. Board Member Deans moved approval of plans dated - stamped February 9, 1988 for office shores, subject to; I. Approval of plans by the community design review board sloes not constitute approval of a building permit. 2. All trash dumpsters shall be stored in screening enclosures with a 100% opaque wooden gate and shall be .a color and material compatible with the building. Enclosures shall be 2 Attachment 1 f Community Design Review Board Minutes 3-1 -OB protected by concrete - filled steel posts, or the equivalent, anchored in the ground at the front corners of the structure. If the enclosure is masonry, the protective posts may be omitted. 3. Any exterior building or roof--top equipment shall be decoratively screened and hidden from view. ih. An erosion control plan, acceptable to the city engineer, shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit for erosion control during construction. 5. Farling areas shall be striped and all bituminous areas shall have continuous concrete curbing. Farling lots shall he kept in a continual state of repair. 6. If construction has not begun within two years of approval, board review shall be repeated. %. Site security lighting shall be provided and shall he directed or shielded so not to cause any undue glare ont(n adjacent properties or roadways. S. If any adjacent property is disturbed or property irons: removed due to construction of the site, that 'property shall be restored and irons replaced by the applicant. 9. Grading, drainage and utility plans shall be subject to the city engineer's approval. 1Q. The easterly driveway is approved in concept, but is subject to staff approval pending the review of the redesign of the intersection. 1:1. The applicant shall construct an eight- foot -wide bituminous sidewalk along the Beam Avenue right -of -way as part: of the required pedestrian walkway plan in the Comprehensive Flan. This sidewalk shall abut the northerly edge of the site. 1.2. The building elevations shall be revised to add face brick as a wainscot up to the windows along the front elevations of - the buildings. Changes in building color shall be subject to staff approval. 1'3. The site plan shall be revised to: a. Widen both driveways to 30 feet. b. Widen the deficient driving lanes within the parking lot to 24 feet. 3 Community l:lesign Review -3- £toard Minutes 3 -1 -88 c. Move the easterly driveway to provide a tt. ?n -foot turning radii at beam Avenue. 1 /1. Al I -grass areas shal l be sod except for the l akeshor••e slope which shall be sod or seed. 151. All required landscape areas shall be contint..taliy and properly maintained. 16. All required plant materials that die shall be replaced by the owners within one year. 17. Reflectorized stop signs and handicap parking signs shall be provided. 18. All public boulevard that is disturbed due to this construction shall be restored and resodded. 19. Building addresses shall be clearly posted, subject to the approval of the director of public safety. ',fir. The applicant shall provide a monetary guarantee, in a form'acceptabla to staff, in the Amount of 150% of the estimated cost of any site improvements that are not completed by occupancy. 21. The lap siding shall be low- maintenance metal material. Board Member Erickson seconded Ayes - -all 4 a 0 U O O s cr i 0 N C NN p .x o p q - O .4 - u 0 m O C A m • �i. p O o q ❑ Sea S m 3 p q y i d� q o ' 0 0 o td o d N b d .Co V� '4 N •� .Y' Cd ' y 0.T .O 'b ' � � 4) d a+ w � ... V q $4 as + O � > O W > a v� - q W M �' O a> 4. Oa N I o o c gti w a q °" o d !'a u CD a- � a N V d r 00 N ~ •^°� .O eoa �+ ' .ti i+ N m 0. N p W a O 0 O d ."a F O `'°" OS O O b [` d $4 a O El CS Ol O 0 o g � 0.'a 9 d' C .� o 93 .E w d o a r df q'w w Q >' V d 0 >> C« m v'� .q o^ 'C o b m o C r .W V m u .,� -p .� id C C A'C .0 O Z El NO C W �° El •o q ,ti d+ •o +� o O .O N N Q{ a , o,,'d w '0 4) 'C '� o v y •S '.°^. o q B 0 , 4 o y O 3 q o 'O b a7 G, of ,� d o .a G C• .� ,.� '� ' y • w c0i q d 'd O q d w O a V c0i z d) o b ... v w 0 d) O C ' y Q q m >> d a 0. w F •b •^ F V ,y' w N o y pp eo y 0 0 4 o o .ix d O w «+ N G y 'C m V O ,.. p G > q �d a' 3. O 'U V 101 b N 'b > O g. 0 N v O d O j o G yy i •O C N W N cMri O 0 d) d >, d L' N �. Q q >. CYi N d 7 GV w O d) a a ,aa ... w Q ag a0 .O .. d N w , V ;"'., 'b w .0 0 I� aG W '� O C F ° a'3 (sl a N o v o- a d c q N �•�� a °° o o a d h s n Co g d ti 3 °d .0 o d d p O O o v b d °� •.=+ �' Ej F a a V F a m ate . N V._ N .0 . 2 > 14 0 �- y F d c y q 1yy 42 y 7 0 '> El d v b d� QI 4bti i0 W Da w V YM n Q1 q •.�. 1 b NO C a o a O y c' C -0 q c w d to ••-f '> N om '' •� v o ' x q a f9 4J y w O N '.•nr 0 .'C m ,C b w H ! > •o r0i 0a O m o u > • w O b ° pp a ba a c a ° ;; z 0 W o : N +A 7 b Y O u a 'O d d C �w ^ ° 5 " wv F4 o m N o 8 M d d. 0 a to 1 0 Z ' O •a .''i W 4 0 S V C w C 0 O R1 a y �• W . w d6 >CL ° � ^ q m x 0a a v "°� a O C m `°' y w o C7 p. N 0^go p O ° o Co vtl a O •� •may o° v C FOi d r•�+ ++ 7 ,b m +� o N0. N m N. OD z a d - 0 a o ea o a s + •� d ..� O N Y 'C , O .� OD _O a, +�� d O a q ... C3 N d wear°. '43 °U' 1 �3aN`�w. woo 8 .�+ Co a C �y y 0. � y W O/ ' W N .,,. a� t ��-r •y•� o u �'" o E-EE-+F A , °F�+ N F : w O e5 cd .c eS ti ai ...: C7 C7 0 v .+ .G aGi .b N � N N > oO ba 7 m w > �{ d b 0. O O V y bb y o a mYb o bb 0 0 o w K++' C6 K 92 .�+ OU ,C. W y w a1 p ya 0. g O O ❑ r+ O Cm, V O C O O O 'y^ 4 -4Ea N OA A D O V 0 o bb o b.9 h l 0 Cl y o O b , .^ 3 ,a •c ,? S3 >, q w N N .r LO b .r Attachment 2 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand-~Associate Planner SUBJECT: Design Review LOCATION: Beam Avenue APPLICANT/OWNER: Desoto Associates PROJECT: Office Shores DATE: March 7, 1988 SUMMARY The applicant is requesting approval of plans for a two-building, 40,000 square-foot office complex" The buildings would have exteriors of horizontal lap siding with face brick at the entrances" (exterior elevations and the easterly access) The lap siding should be aluminum to avoid the need for future painting. More extensive use of face brick should be used to help break up the long expanse of siding, more so than just at the entrances. Brick applied to the front and end elevations to the eaves would help the overall appearance of these long structures. It would also be compatible with the present commercial development in this area which is entirely brick" The concept of the easterly driveway is acceptable, however, the following revisions should be made: 1^ The driveway access from Beam Avenue should line up with the southbound portion of Kennard Street to the north. This would allow for easier flow of traffic crossing Beam Avenue" 2" The east-hound merging lane and the triangular island should be eliminated, since the city no longer has plans to extend Kennard Street to the south as a through road. Approval of the final design should be subject to the approval of the city engineer. R21�!2mmeadAt Ion- Approval of plans date-stamped February 9, 1908 for office shores, subject to: 1^ Approval of plans by the community design review board does not constitute approval of a building permit. 2. All trash dumpsters shall be stored in screening enclosures with a 100% opaque wooden gate and shall be a color and material compatible with the building. Enclosures shall be protected by concrete-filled steel posts, or the equivalent, anchored in the ground at the front corners of the structure" If the enclosure is masonry, the protective posts may be omitted, 6 Attachment 3 3. Any exterior building or roof-top equipment shall be decoratively screened and hidden from view. 4^ An erosion control plan, acceptable to the city engineer, shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit for erosion control during construction" 5. Parking areas shall be striped and all bituminous areas shall have continuous concrete curbing. Parking lots shall be kept in a continual state of repair. 6" If construction has not begun within two years of approval, board review shall be repeated" 7" Site security lighting shall be provided and shall be directed or shielded so not to cause any undue glare onto adjacent properties or roadways. 8. If any adjacent property is disturbed or property irons removed due to construction of the site, that property shall be restored amd irons replaced by the applicant. 9" Grading, drainage and utility plans shall be subject to the city engineer's approval. 10" The easterly driveway is approved in concept, but is subject to staff approval pending the review of the redesign of the intersection. 11" The applicant shall construct an eight-foot-wide bituminous sidewalk along the Beam Avenue right-of-way as part of the required pedestrian walkway plan in the Comprehensive Plan. This sidewalk shall abut the northerly edge of the site. 12. The building elevations shall be revised to add face brick up to the eaves along the front and end elevations of the buildings. The lap siding shall be a low-maintenance metal material. 13^ The site plan shall be revised to: a" Widen both driveways to 30 feet. b" Widen the deficient driving lanes within the parking lot to 24 feet (see page 6). c" Move the easterly driveway to provide a ten-foot turning radii at Beam Avenue. 14" All grass areas shall be sod except for the lakeshore slope which shall be sod or seed" 15" All required landscape areas shall be continually and properly maintained" FJ 16. All required plant materials that die shall be replaced by the owners within on year" 17^ Reflectorized stop signs and handicap parking signs shall be provided, 18" All public boulevard that is disturbed due to this construction shall be restored and resodded" 19" Building addresses shall be clearly posted, subject to the approval of the director of public safety" 20. The applicant shall provide a monetary guarantee, in a form acceptable to staff, in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of any site improvements that are not completed by occupancy" mb Attachments: 1" Location Map 2^ Property Line/Zoning Map 3 and 4" Site Plans 5^ Plans date-stamped 2-9-88 ` WHI TE BEAR HEIGHTS ttir Co RD 0 D .. � N W a a %yDOOLYNN NR SS S nOD YDIA CTI E^ a W % V' %1PLL 19 i ST J S S N 1 BLVD = ti z W R x AV 19 u MAPLE VIE% M1 g RAOAT z AV MA w � i ruu = (71 B (21 PR /VAT KOHLMANw AV W HLMA AV /d@SSAB/ AL o NOR7 N w ¢ o CO > RD Z3.?I Cn ^ T29N,R ? 22W EMIL y V 3C 30 E L RD IOIII O (1)CONNOR AV ¢ m H t . S0 & E ' LE f a a SEXTANT AV 0 %TA T AV F h AV r cn a GE AI BE ERVAIS AV Z GRANMEW AV W CT y m VIKING OR Y C ASTLE AY 36 H COPE CT COPE py hOcklB HBOd Lake COPE CpA�LE AV s_I j LARK AV w %' J LL N N o RD B" z LA RI < W w 4 I AND RD SAND- HURST ¢ z z x u 2S Z JUNCTION ST - o Y CO > RD "S h g A V Kil Rk AV x R o AV X` S ST N m LDRIDG AV A IW i ,� p� RECREATION T P j KILLMAN AV �' RRIS n"� 4 NROSEMWO�� S } /' S NOl N h tl N N J 4 28 U � N LOCATION MAP 9 Attachment 1 0 N 1 11` 40' 1 1 I. 'I 292 nra)s •.I )111 ■� I I is BEAM N .ft yl y I ft 33 35.08 241.70 • `S tit • S k n I• u l �n 1 A "$F} ' ? pe 5 ° S tt ,F } �� d o C S'ti 0 �.. 121.17 -. 92 8oG ar 2.13 ee. ''t `> '+"`h� • if y k •� >, a,°6%o''wr O i•'•- -`C.R• id:.: n :h: OE INCWS, d fi�.y y E.r•: -. ,: :§ :{ <okk:e v }w.fi:; : V u 61x4 IN 4. OITCN 0�k• �,, .2' fi' t � #, c ?�' r :'!'S)�'FxBF•F ±`;$:S::iikk °I 11� 2.2 . '•g:..t{ off• ;$•: :..>. d: S6> cit; rk } ',3'o:,ukkro } }} 1 s,,?7:+,;.'�i > � �e� o�:• t t ' '. c. �' jF' �fkfno% } '. n%t'o:i� j (7) : 0 \': �k�:,`? Y�? x} o-e< o `8c�:? }Ti��� * °.fii;ike�.:,ti:.,: p } }$. - ;g.� E :. :..L:tt, ;.•t;h -„n :; }:,k; }, ` ;k;,fl::k • y. \ ":}fii •F':•:}'•'•'y}: •l. ` •:ki : ikC};.i.:f:: F., . .Ce• :' }: }fA::v ' ci3 '�[i'j }`k:4:,'$.5::$?�k..t;:::. :.: • 4 •: p :::::k: :k \G:2 ___ ..: L:'. iY:% %g:$i..i•: <i:<;1i�:ktkkF;i;'s�" _ ( . II .1 N A y V t ) }- ;:$ }:; �I.�F -d.tl . ..+?.}:'kt; \W : ) ,til l c DES'' ' c'k c.c } w W. •IZ'tH h I IM VILLAGE OF MAO' EW000 PONDING AREA D.a1111DOD I - 111 -12 0 X ,i 10.0 3 Ae.. (20.90ec) 3 00. 0 � O T. ti E OU I I v. a 3' a a IQ: iz, I� h ;p N In Ih I", 4.04 PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 10 Attachment 2 if BEAM AVENUE i — i I/ _.. � :• +' . •iii °�:iFi �. i� /,' � % %/I .. '.r l s : �r �j, 1 1 1111 INTERSECTION t t� l i II REDESIGN I''''�itl'I I I�iiill;� I t �L 1 s SITE PLAN 0 Drive aisles to be widened to 24 ft. 11 Attachment 3 n N BEAM AVENUE / � .. . �' T6••- ,. i � "\?� \'�\ • t ''...: /�j '}f'!,r�;PS ,,yK'�',•,'.',i,;"^` .;�:F:^ti': X I S TIN G E V INTERSECTION M I ;.;; ��� • : ,•. ;� �- ;;; .... // � j• / / �\ �,•� � LAYO ray 1 . ; . s : : i "r�ill W �;II ' I k ; I SITE PLAN (Existing Intersection Design) 1 2 Attachment 4 lu N 1� Action by Council:; Endorsed. Mo dif i ed.e_.,._,,,„, MEMORANDUM HoJocted.____,__ Date. T0: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: I -494 Interchange DATE: February 22, 1988 Introduction Woodbury is reviewing a consultant's study on how to increase access to I -494 in Woodbury. One of the recommendations is to construct an interchange at I -494 and Courtly Road, realign Courtly Road to cross the interchange and connect to Century Avenue, connect Valley Creek Drive to the Courtly Road extension and add additional lanes on I -494 between the Courtly Road and Valley Creek Drive interchanges. (See attached map.) These improvements are proposed to relieve the anticipated congestion at the Valley Creek Road interchange when the surrounding area is fully developed. Therefore, these would be long -range improvements. The consultant also recommends that further study be done before deciding on the exact location for the Courtly Road interchange. Background The original Maplewood comprehensive plan had shown an interchange at I -494 and Century Avenue. This was later deleted when Maplewood and Woodbury could not agree on a location. Discussion The proposed location is favorable to Maplewood. Residents of the lower "leg" would have improved access to I -494. Locating the intersection in Woodbury would avoid the associated traffic congestion and commercial development which would be inconsistent with the low density residential use planned in Maplewood. Recommendation No action is required. kd Attachment Map WIDEN RADIO DRIVE TO GRADE SEPARATION AND GRADE SEPARATION AND S-LANES BETWEEN EXTENSION OF WEIR EXTENSION OF BIELENBERGJI_94 NORTH I I RNE (PHASE '10 ! DRIVE (PHASE 0. RAMPS & ••" _ �� l� TAMARACK I l i p 1: V (PHASE B !EXTEND AUXILIARY LANES EXTEND C -0 ROAD ,THROUGH 1 -94 INTERCHANGE % THROUGH RADIO DRIVE 2 D (PHASE 11) m i i INTERCHANGE (PHASE i) O AUXILIAF Y.,LANES BETWEEN VALLEY' NEW TAMARACK ROAD CREEK DRIVE °AND'1 -94 INTERCHANGE (FOLDED INTERCHANGES (PHASE 1) DIAMOND) rt .. ,I ����� •I � (PHASE 0 U EXTEND TAMARACK ROAD (PHASE U AR ALIGN °:WEIR DRIVE,(PHASE'U' GRADE SEPARATION AT CONNECT VALLEY CHEEK. CENTER DRIVE (PHASE�1 DRIVE'-.TO COURTLY+, OADi -- , N..,.. • "� EXTENSION'{PHASE ° Ili '„ WOODLANE DRIVE.. 44. _ - -� E(TENSIOW(PHASE D:: / V � GEOMETRIC IMPROVE� NTSAT: I Q i ` 'VALLEY CREEK ORIVE'(PHASE •0! - , I- •� / NO -+' AUXILIARY LANES BETWEEN ,COURTLY.• v` ANO VALLEY' INTERCHANGES (PHASE Iq I - NEW INTE Ak II • (PHASE I) — — -� (PHASE II). ST RGAR• PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS FIGURE' ROSCOE. fAUSai, INC. 1 -494 ACCESS IMPROVEMENT STUDY 4 Planning Commission Minutes 2~29-88 1. The owne > 91 this property shall release, by deed, any right that a run with this property to use the 33'- -foot-wide acce�� ��asement that abuts the northwest corner, 2" Approve the re on to vacate the right-of-way dedicated for the t ry Hillwood Drive cul-de-sac" The resolution shall no b sent to the county to be recorded until the preliminary play cohditions are met. 3. Approve the solut to rezone the site from F, farm residence to R^~ in�le �welling" � \ Commissioner Sletten econded Ayes~~Axdahl r Ayers, / Barrett, Cardinal, Dempsey, Fiala, Fischer, Gains, Larson, Sigmundik, Sletten D. I~494 Interchange Secretary Olson gave a presentation on the proposed I-494 interchange" IX" UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Code Amen t: 2 Lot Widths Secretary Olso reponted the staff report and confirmed with planning .. commi10jon'that it stated the commission's intent" ' X. COMMISSION PRESENV A. Council Meeti so Feb ruary 8 and 22, 1988 � XI. STAFF PRESENTATI ONS A. Council M tinq�^- 14, 1988: Sue Fiala B. National Rlanning Co��ference / XII" ADJOURNMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: City Manager 7iGLwvPCZ. RE: Suburban Community Channels - Equipment Grant DATE: March 8, 1988 AGENDA # I -3 Action by Counoll.. -j Endorsed...,__ Modified--, 110J noted_.„ Date--._ Ginny Holder, Executive Director of Suburban Community Channels, has requested time on the Council Agenda to make a brief presentation on how the City can better utilize Cable T.V „ and to discuss a grant that is available for cable equipment. If the Council agrees that the grant for equipment should be pursued, Staff would have until the end of March to submit it, Zffiarlro March 4, 1988 Mike McGuire, City Manager City of Maplewood 11830 E. County Rcad B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. McGuire: March 31, 1988 marks the deadline for grant requests to the Cable Commission for this year, Over the past few months we have explored how the City of Maplewood might benefit from equipment purchased by the Cable Commission to promote the City. Since the deadline for grants is drawing to a close and Maplewood stands to benefit. I would like to encourage the council to consider a request. Television technology is not always perceived as a ber_efit. But, as a Minnesota Vocational Technical TV Production Instructor, I can outline to the council their role as well as their ability to control and benefit from the technology. There are a number of sister cities who are requesting equipment that will promote city events without doing live council meetings. In fact, there are several options the City of Maplewood can consider. If I may, I'd like to make a presentation to the council on March 14th. Then, if the council felt they could benefit from a grant request, you would have a couple of weeks to prepare the request. Thanks for your consideration. Sincerely, Ginny Holder Executive Director 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 (612) 779 -7145 Community television as good as you make it. 121'88 RAMSEY - WASHINGTON COUNTIES SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION 1902 EAST COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 612 -779 -7144 January 18, 1988 Mr. Kenneth Haider City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Haider: The Ramsey /Washington Cable Commission representing the cities of Birchwood Village, Dellwood, Lake Elmo, Mahtomedi, Maplewood, North St. Paul, Oakdale, Vadnais Heights, White Bear Lake, White Bear Township, Willernie and Grant Township is making grant money available to member municipalities to enhance cable television use by individual cities. Cable television has the capacity to distribute local city information to residents including the distribution of public announcements and the distribution of City Council and other public meetings. Due to lack of equipment and limited budgets, many cities have been unable to utilize this valuable communication tool available to them. This grant program was developed to assist cities in implementing municipal programming or in expanding their use of cable television in other ways. The only limitation on the use of these funds is that the use must be cable television - related. Examples of cable television - related uses might include: A. Purchasing of equipment to produce government programs. B. Enhancement of existing character generator's capability. C. Extension of internal wiring in public buildings. D. Extension of cable installations to additional public buildings. January 18, 1988 Page Two If your municipality is interested in obtaining grant money for a use listed above or one of your own design, please fill out the enclosed application, providing as much detail on the projected use of the money as possible. Once again, this money is being made available to member cities only to develop the use of cable television by your municipality. The grants, with a ceiling of $14,000 a piece, are available to member cities to encourage development of cable television use. Finally, the Ramsey /Washington Public Access Corporation and its Executive Director, Virginia Holder, are prepared to advise and consult with you regarding equipment needs. Ms. Holder has developed an equipment package and would purchase the equipment from that package for your City. All equipment will then be owned and maintained by the member city. Cities using grant money for other cable - related purposes (ex. hiring a video producer, wiring a building) will need to provide documentation of the expenditure to the Cable Commission. Now is the time to utilize the grant money and realize some of your goals for cable television. The deadline for the 1988 grant applications is March 31, 1988. If you need more information or if you have any questions, please call Gary Matz at 893 -6711. Si n c erely, M 6V 01V� Marlys Oliver MO•dl GRANT APPLICATION TO OBTAIN FUNDING FOR CABLE - RELATED PURPOSES I. Municipality Information Contact Person Name of City Position Address City /State Phone Number Amount of Grant Money Requested Code II. Specify, in detail, what the grant money from the Ramsey /Washington Cable Commission would be used for if granted to your City. III. To what extent would you require our staff's guidance in carrying out your project? (Example: Consultation on equipment purchase) IV. Describe your City's current use of cable television for municipal programming. V. Describe your City's goals and commitment to use cable television in the next five years (including staff time and monetary commitment). I understand that the grant money is being made available by the Ramsey /Washington Cable Commission for use by municipalities for cable - related purposes only. The information provided above is complete and representative of the applications for which we will use the grant. Signature of Applicant Return grant application to: Ms. Colleen Crowley Ramsey /Washington Cable Commission 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota Deadline: March 31, 1988 AGENDA 04 A &B MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: City Manager y*� RE: St. Paul Water Board DATE: March 8, 1988 The purpose of this item is to update the City Council on the status of the special legislation and for the Council to appoint a Council representative to serve on the newly created advisory committee. Action by Council: Endorsed Modified_ Ro,l e cte d:®...�. �.®._ Date— .— __ _ A report will be made at the Council meeting regarding the March 9th Water Advisory Committee meeting and the current status of legislation, 11Y.Iman, 81 CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS THOMAS D. MOGREN General Manager CHRIS NICOSIA, PRESIDENT r I ` DEBORAH Y. BACHRACH, VICE PRESIDENT VERNE E. JACOBSEN ` F 'RAYMOND E. LANGEVIN VICTOR TEDESCO Assistant General Manager P: JOHN DREW MISSISSIPPI RIVER LAKES TREATMENT 7. Sarch 2, 1980 _:r. . chael A. cGuire City tanager City of ; aplevrood 1830 East County Road. "B° - :w.Dlev,00d, 1dranesota 55109 Dear :,r. !..icGuire: BERNIE R. BULLERT Supt. of Water Distribution ROGER A. MOHROR Water Production Engineer PUMPING DISTRIBUTION At a n.eeting of the Board of '':'later Commissioners of the City of Saint Paul m, February 25, 1930, a. resolution (copy enclosed) was adopted. - regardir7 the for - 1 -ation of a committee for - tie purpose of improving, communication between thie Board, ti:e _'a„levrood City Council, and ov,ners of property v.ho live in the proximity..o.f the ',pater treatment plant and spent -lime lagoons. The committee will address concerns and complaints arising from - the operation of these facilities. The 1 has named Commissioner Raymond Eyler to be its representative on the coi��mittee and requests the City of k!arlev:ood select a representative from the Cit. Council and also three representative residents to serve on the committee. inclosed is a co; - )y of a letter to the Utility dated Februar 1i�', 19S8, frorz Carol;.m. Peterson, 1;99 Jacason Street, regardin people c:io have volunteered to serve on this com;�.zdttee. The Utilit, rocmmends the consideration of -'ill I'ar-rran, 9G. ast Roselavn; John ?lovac, 93 Bast S ;cil7rtan; and., Carolyn Peterson, 10 Jaci.son ;'erect as the nci^ Coorhood representatives to the committee (as tJ :elr had ;previ.ously ezpressc' an interest in participation). Consiaer'a,.ion nay oe ven to namin;; the re- :air,in.; names on the list as alternates. This could be discussed at the first meeti-no'. Please inform me by telephone of the names of the City Cowicil re_Dresenta- tive and those selected from ti'_e neir'n-Lorhooe, so a rnee tip. ' date ray be schcdaiod as soon as ?)ossible. Thard: you for your coo)eration. ver;_l m d, � /7m Thomas D. ;. o rc TL? i /sa General : hnaFe T1mcl . cc: ComJUissipner Eyler Ito «er A. ' iohror }: i. 4TH FLOOR CITY HALL ANNEX - ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 CITY OF ST. PAUL OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS RESOLUTION — GENERAL FORM PRESENTED BY Eyler COMMISSIONER 3850 February 25, 1988 1? R.EAS, The treatment plant, including the spent lime lagoons, of the Saint Paul Water Utility is located within the City of Iv%ple- wood; and WfEEEAS, The Utility has received complaints from residents living in the vicinity of the spent lime lagoons concerning the activities involved in the removal of the spent lime by contractors hired by the Utility; and W1 The General 1 12neg er has recommended that the Board estab- lish a committee consisting of representatives of these residents and a member each from the Board and the Maplewood City Council for the purpose of addressing any complaints arising from this operation and to provide a better means of communication between the residents, the Board and the Maplewood City Council; and rEMLE.AS, The Maplewood City Council has indicated a willingness to serve on such a committee and to select representative residents to serve thereon; now, therefore, be it RFSOLVED, That the Board of Water Commissioners of the City of Saint Paul does hereby establish a committee for the purposes aforesaid, to consist of one representative of the Board and the Maplewood City Council, and three Maplewood residents selected by the said City Council. Water Commissioners Adopted by the Board of Water Commissioners Yeas Nays Dimond February 25, 88 :;vler 19._ Goswitz Sonnen Vice President Bachrach In favor —`L Oppos —O — ' SECY. February !-Ir. Roger vohror St. Paul (dater Utility 19CO L. Rice Street Maplewood, MI; 55113 Lear Mr. Mohror: Re: Advisory Board r RAC NE(1 FfB 22 rg CITY Of S . 8d fYArG r PAUL R UTILIrr 19 AIV, rollowing is a list of people who would be willing to serve on an advisory board from our neighborhood: Bill or Colleen Engman 94-E. Roselawn, Maplewood 55117 John Nowak 93 E. Skillman it Clarence Osen 5C L. Roselawn It iiaree Duea 1955 Jackson St. It Glenn or Carolyn Peterson 1999 Jackson. St. Lawrenoo or Dolores Decker 160 E. County Road B, Maplewood "55117 From this group of people we anticipate that 4 or 5 would attend a meeting at any one time. Very truly yours, Carolyn eterson THOMAS D. MOGREN General Manager VERNE E. JACOBSEN Assistant General Manager MISSISSIPPI RIVER ''s. = hael A. ':cCuire City iana,'er Cit of '.a_olewood 1 :ast County Eoad 551 a_olec:ood, _:� n.iesota ,ear :'r. McGuire: iarcr! 1 1 , l co BERNIE R. BULLERT Supl. of Water Distribution ROGER A. MOHROR Water Production Engineer DISTRIBUTION Vie: Conm.Attee "eetit_. -As r_e discussed, the firs corr:.ittee for addressi"_l; prob'less of oard- m.mi( facilities located 3'•'J3 oe f,_ r _?"Gr t Pectin Of the Board of . ate Co;'.S'_ssio - crs l or concerns ch arise fro?n td_e o " Oc'_'at "ior in : a"'lee :ooc, will ue held on arch ^, 1Sc;; at n o_ c t; auC_' tTC i ; -r _t It vou .:ill "s: ot..;: t:._c : "a;7er:oo. L; "t Co c. c` re;;rr_ _Cn_tativc of t',e *:.ecti i_: . Ctel'30' "'a tv ^.r v0 .0� Cr Ol" Or r0C Lv1 - - if o.1CfC are Ri'; (tit ^. e_.0 "i i.S Or nattCr, ploas cal. o 2,.- '!_ r . iuoMas D. _o : General °ana er/ 1;; saJ cc: o -er ;'oilror, . ater Pro:'., ^. r. Co?_'_ciooioner ? , ^ o;id 7:1or cssrs. !!:l. Ill. _o,; . - r ID.Lr:o. =r &. Garo!.'.o PCtCr"o'.''. . _r, Lm.'rence 'JCC.'_er - CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS CHRIS NICOSIA, PRESIDENT DEBORAH Y. BACHRACH, VICE PRESIDENT RAYMOND E. LANGEVIN VICTOR TEDESCO LAKES JOHN DREW TREATMENT PUMPING 4TH FLOOR CITY HALL ANNEX - ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 THE WATER UTiLRY OF THE CRY OF ST. PAUL March G, 1988 Legislative Committee on Local and Urban Affairs Roos: 522 - State Office Building Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155 4k ATTN: Julian bveon c : Dear Mr. Xmpson. At a February 23, 1983 meeting lRoom 306 of the State Office Building attended by representatives of, Local and Urban Affairs Committee, the City of Maplewood and the Hoard of r Commissioners of the City of Saint Paul, concerns of the City of Maplewo ver the Board's operation of a spent -lime lagoon system were addressed. After disoussio e Board was requested to provide the following in- formation to your offias. 1.) Action taken by the Board of Water Commissioners on the formation of a committee which will improve communica- tions between the Board, the City of Yaplewood and neighborhood residents; and, will address concerns and complaints arising from the operation of the Board's spent -lime lagoon system or other facilities located in the City of Maplewood. 2.) The naming of a Utility employee to whom all complaints or concerns may be forwarded. 3.) A brief summary of the Water Utility's short, medium and long, -term plans regarding the operation of the spent -lime lagoon system. Regarding item 1, enclosed is a copy of a letter to }ar. Michael A. modnire, City Manager of Maplewood, along with a copy of Board Resolution No. wO *stablishing the committee. As soon as the Maplewood representatives to the committee are named, the Hoard will schedule a meeting o!' the oaanmittee early in the week of March 7, 1988 if possible. '.' Legislative Committee on Local and Urban Affairs State Office Building Saint Paul, Minnesota ATTNi Julian Empson -2- lurch 4, 1988 Regarding item 2, the Utility has named Mr. Roger A. 16hror, Water Production Engineer, as the person to be contacted. Mr. 1Sohror may be reached at 489 -1051. Regarding item ), enclosed is a brief summary of the Utility's short, medium and long -term plane on the handling of spent -lime. If additional information is needed, please let me know. s c •e Thomas D41,re 7 General Manager TDIVeaJ Enols. co: Michael McGuire Maplewood City Manager Raymond Eyler, Member - Board of Water Commissioners THE WATER UTILITY OF THE CITY OF ST. PAUL March 2, 1988 1 1.""chael A. McGuire City Tanager City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road "B" Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. McGuire: At a meeting of the Board of Water Commiesionr` a of the City of Saint Paul on February 25, 1988, a resolution (eopyelosed) was °adopted regarding the for- mation of a committee for the purpose of improving communication between the Board, the Maplewood City Council, and orners of Y ` i� perty who live in the proximity of the rater treatment plant and spent- lime,lagoons.V The committee will address concerns and complaints arising from the op at,ion of these facilities. The Board has named Commission No Eyler to be its representative on the committee and requests t3i� City of Maplewood select a representative from the City Council and also three`reepr�es�entative residents to serve on the committee. Enclosed is a copy of a let to the Utility dated February 19, 1908, from Carolyn Peterson, 1999 Jackson Street, regarding people who have volunteered to serve on this committee. The Utility recommende the consideration of Bill Engman, 94 East Roselawn; John Nowak, 93 East Skillman; and, Carolyn Peterson, 1999 Jackson Street as the neighborhood representatives to the committee (as they had previously expressed an interest in participation). Consideration may be given to naming the remaining names on the list as alternates. This could be discussed at the first meeting. Please inform me by telephone of the names of the City Council representa- tive and those selected from the neighborhood so a meeting date may be scheduled as soon as possible. Thank you for your cooperation. Yours very truly, Thomas D. Mogren TDJ./saj General 11anager Encl. cc: Commissioner Eyler Roger A. ldohror CITY OF ST. PAUL OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS RESOLUTION —GENERAL FORM No 385 PRES�NTED BY Ey ler February 25 1988 COMM SSIONER DAT WEMEAS, The treatment plant, including the spent lime lagoons, of the Saint Paul Water Utility is located within the City of Maple- wood; and WHEPYEAS, The Utility has received complaints from residents living in the vicinity of the spent lime lagoons concerning the activities involved in the removal of the spent lime by contractors hired by the Utility; and WHEREAS, The General Manager has recommended that the Board estab- lish a committee consisting of representatives of these residents and a member each from the Board and the Maplewood City Council for the purpose of addressing any complaints arising from this operation and to provide a better means of communication between the residents, the Board and the Maplewood City Council] and X=EAS, The Paplewood City Council has indicated a wil to serve on such a committee and to select representative residents to serve thereon] now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Board of Water Commissioners of the City of Saint Paul does hereby establish a committee for the purposes aforesaid, to consist of one representative of the Board and the Maplewood City Council, and three Maplewood residents selected by the said City Council. Water Commissioners Yeas Nays Adopted by the Board of Water Commissioners Dimond F,yler Goswitz Sonnen Vice President Bachrach In favor_ `_ February 25, 88 19_ oppos —O SECY. February irr. Roger Mohror 6t. Paul ldater Utility 19C0 1:. Rice Street vAplewood, b8; 55113 Lear Mr. Mohror: Re: Advisory Board r Ric NEO FES 22 ] °E3 CITY cc Sr PAUL ►tiHr,a, ur¢i� 1 `p , t1lV. z Following is a list of people who would be willing to serve on an advisory board from.our neighborhood: Bill or Colleen Engman John Nowak Clarence Osen I•Iareo Due& 94 B. Roselawn, Maplewood 55117 93 E. Skillman it 5C E. Roselawn it 1955 Jackson St. " Glenn or Carolyn Peterson 1999 Jackson St. " Lawrenoo or Delores Decker 160 E. County Road B, Maplewood " From this group of people we anticipate that 4 or 5 would attend it meeting at ary one time. Very truly youra Carolyr, et,rson INFORPttiTION REGARDING THE OPERATION OF SAINT PAUL WATER UTILITY SPENT -LIME LAGOONS AS REQUESTED BY THE MINNESOTA LEGISLA -IVE COMMITTEE ON LOCAL AND URBAN AFFAIRS The following is a summary of the Utility's short, medium and long -term plans regarding the handling of spent -lime. SHORT -TERM Plans and specifications for extraction and hauling of spent -lime material from the Utility's lagoon system in 1988 are being prepared. They will address the problems and concerns of the City of Maplewood and the residents who live near the lagoons and will be reviewed and discussed by the committee established by the Board prior to advertising for bids. Estimated cost is $1,000,000. Mrn T11M_TFDM The Water Utility is proceeding with the steps necessary to accomplish the use of centrifuges at the water treatment plant in order to reduce the volume of spent -lime discharged to the lagoon system. Approximately $400,000 of capital improvements will be required to make this plan operational. It is anticipated a centrifuging system will be operational by August, 1988. Year -round hauling of the lime cake produced by this process will reduce the volume of spent -lime discharged to the lagoons, thereby reducing the volume of material which must be hauled annually from the lagoons. LONG -TERM The Water Utility is committed to evaluating all available technology which would provide a reduction of the volume of solids which must be placed in the lagoon system. One such technology is the filter press system being implemented by the City of Minneapolis. This system may provide the means for the greatest reduction in the volume of solids which are discharged to the lagoon system. Estimated cost of this system is 7 million dollars. The Utility estimates it would require ap- proximately 5 to 6 years to make such a system operational. February 1988 AGENDA # 1 -5 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: City Manager RE: Builders /Developers Meeting DATE: March 8, 1988 INTRODUCTION G.cAlon by Counc11:1 Endo rsed.. Modif led—__ Re,jected .__ Dat e._ ��- ­__ A meeting was held with the Builders /Developers that do business in Maplewood on March 2, 1988. Approximately 20 individuals attended and a number of issues were discussed. The City agreed to review the concerns that were raised (a summary of the meeting is attached). The item that was of immediate concern was the Noise Ordinance. The question was . . Does Ordinance #611 apply to home construction, and if so, can it be amended either excluding them between the hours of 7:00 a.m. until 10:00 p.m. Monday - Friday or allow for the permit to be issued as part of the building permit and for the same period of time. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council discuss their intent in passing the ordinance, and whether an amendment is appropriate. MAM:Inb BUILDERS /DEVELOPERS MEETING MARCH 2, 1988 City Manager Michael McGuire opened the meeting by welcoming everyone and explaining the purpose. The following people were present: Name Company Telephone John Greavu Mayor of Maplewood 770 -4500 Michael McGuire City of Maplewood 770 -4525 Dave Mervin Kraus - Anderson 721 -7581 Ken Gervais Castle Design 770 -3168 John Peterson Good Value Homes 780 -5510 Arnie Esterbrooks Gonyea Company 377 -0191 Rick Perry Gurtek Construction 636 -1891 Sam Cave Ed Cave & Sons, Inc. 482 -9667 Gary Grant Mary Anderson 881 -2661 Jim Slaten Jefferson Homes 429 -5309 Kent Jeffferson Jefferson Homes 429 -5309 Annette O'Conner Maplewood Highlands 593 -0116 Norman Anderson Maplewood City Council 770 -4500 Dick Pepper Knutson Construction Co 572 -5757 Gordy Howe Masterpiece Homes 484 -3244 Tony Jones Masterpiece Homes 484 -3244 Frank Frattalone Frattalone - Mogren Associates 484 -0448 Keith Mogren Mogren Bros 777 -2734 Mario Cocchiarella Sherman - Boosalis Cos. 332 -3000 Geoff Olson City of Maplewood 770 -4560 Ken Haider City of Maplewood' 770 -4552 Fran Juker Maplewood City Council 770 -4500 There was general discussion by those present. The following issues will be further addressed: 1. Noise ordinance - The consensus was that the 10:00 p.m., to 7:00 a.m., prohibition on noise was reasonable, but the requirement for a permit for the operating of any equipment between 7:00 a.m., and 10:00 p.m., was unreasonable. If one is required, it should be part of the building permit, not a separate permit. City Staff will present this concern to the City Council at the March 14th meeting. 2. The length of time that it takes to get a building permit was questioned. The concensus was that it would be satisfactory if the City could issue residendital permits within 3 to 5 days during slower times and 5 to 7 days during busier times. City Manager indicated that the City would make every effort to meet those timelines. 3. It was requested that the City consider establishing an Economic Committee. The lower leg of Maplewood, in particular, has an identity problem. The City needs to promote itself. Potential homebuyers want to go to Woodbury, even though lots are nicer in Maplewood. It was indicated that the City would explore the costs associated with this request, and the potential benefits. 4. It was requested that the City review its' policy on financing trails. There was a concern that it is unfair to require a developer to pay for a trail, when another developer without a trail planned in his development does not have this cost. It was suggested that trails be paid for with PAC funds. City Manager McGuire stated that this would be reviewed. 5. It was requested that the City consider issuing all building related permits through the Community Development Department. City Manager stated he would review that request. 6. It was mutually agreed that the City should consider a variance process to allow for decreasing road widths in unique cases, such as topography or in heavily wooded areas. 7. The Builders /Developers discussed getting together and pooling their resources to promote Maplewood. It was pointed out that a billboard on 694 and 10th had been paid for by a group of them already. It was agreed that this type of a meeting was beneficial and that they should be scheduled 3 or 4 times per year. ORDINANCE NO. 611 AN ORDINANCE FOR NOISE CONTROL THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 19 -48 is added as follows: "A. Section 19 -48. Noises Prohibited. General prohibition. No person shall make or cause to be made any distinctly and loudly audible noise that unreasonably annoys, disturbs, injures, or endangers the comfort, repose, health, peace, safety, or welfare of any person or precludes their enjoyment of property or affects their property's value. If the event or activity is sponsored by the City or authorized and has a permit for such activity issued by the City, this prohibition does not apply. This general prohibition is not limited by the specific restriction of the following subdivision. Any violations of this general prohibition between the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M., is a per se violation of this ordinance. Section 2. Section 19 -49. Domestic power equipment. The normal operation of domestic power equipment shall not be subject to the noise level limitations in Sections 19 -48 and 19 -50. Domestic power equipment as used herein means power lawn mowers, hedge clippers, edgers; chain saws; garden tillers; mulchers; and power saws, drills, hammers, and sanders. Section 3. Section 19 -50, construction activities. No person shall engage in or permit construction activities involving the use of any kind of electric, diesel, or gas - powered machine or other power equipment except with a permit issued by the City Clerk after complying with requirements and fees set by the City Council, for purposes of noise control. Section 4. Section 19 -51. Application; fee duration. a) Any person desiring a permit to engage or permit construction activi- ties involving the use of any kind of electric, diesel, or gas - powered machine or other power equipment in the City shall make application for the same to the Clerk upon a form prescribed by the City Council. The application shall set forth: 1. The name and address of the applicant; 2. A list of the equipment which the applicant proposes to use in such construction activities; 3. The place or places in which the construction activity will occur; 4. The manner in which said construction equipment is to be used and the type of construction activity which will occur; 5. The times and dates in which the equipment will be used for con- struction activity. b) Said application described in Subsection (a) in this section shall be submitted to the City Clerk, or a duly authorized representative, finds that the applicant is responsible, has proper equipment for such construction activity and that no nuisance is likely to be created by the granting of said permit, the Clerk shall endorse the approval upon the application. The City c) Before any permit may be issued, the applicant shall pay to the Clerk a permit fee imposed, set, established and fixed by the City Council, by resolu- tion, from time to time, which fee shall accompany the application. d) No permit issued under this article shall be for a period longer than thirty days. Section 5. Section 19 -52. Enforcement duties. The Maplewood Police Department shall enforce the provisions of this ordinance. The Maplewood Police Department or its members may inspect private premises other than private residences and shall make all resonable efforts to prevent violations of this ordinance. A. Civil remedies. This ordinance may be enforced by injunction, action for abatement, or other appropriate civil remedy. B. Noise impact statements. The Council may require any person applying for a change in zoning classification or a permit or license for any structure, operation, process, installation or alteration, or project that may be con- sidered a potential noise source to submit a noise impact statement on a form prescribee by the Council. It shall evaluate each such statement and take its evaluation into account in approving or disapproving the license or permit applied for or the zoning change requested. C. Criminal penalties. Every person who violates any provision of this ordinance is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall, upon conviction, be subject to a fine of not more than $700 or imprisonment for a term of not to exceed 90 days, or both, plus, in either case, the costs of prosecution. Each act of violation and each day a violation occurs or continues constitutes a separate offense. Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication." Passed by the Maplewood City Council _ this 15th day of October, 1987. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 AGENDA ITEM Z 6 Action by CQUU0 111 TO: City Manager Endorse FROM: City Engineer Modifie SUBJECT: Century and Carver -- Street Signs Rejecte DATE: March 8, 1988 Date®,�,.®.;s,,.. Attached is a letter from a group of residents near Century and Carver Avenues. Both roads are the responsibility of Ramsey County. The letter accurately describes the area relative to hills and curves that result in limited sight distance. The parents are concerned for their children's safety due to the severity of the topography and apparent lack of judgment on the part of many drivers. The letter suggests two signs stating "Watch Children" may help the situation. This statement may be more informative and indeed may actually "wake up" some of the inattentive drivers. It is recommended the city council adopt a resolution requesting Ramsey County install two "Watch Children" signs at the appropriate locations. jc Attachment February 8, 1988 City of Maplewood Attn: Mr. Ken Haiden, 1830 Co. Rd. B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Haiden: City Engineer I am writing this letter on behalf of three families (the Miners, Dierichs, who live at the intersection of Century Ave. South and in Maplewood. (See attached map for exact location.) A OR 'H8 Swensons and Carver Ave. Our concern is for our children who play at the ends of our driveways and ride their bikes along this stretch of road. Many vehicles, especially the ones driven by teenagers, travel this stretch of road like they're on the Indy 500 and not like they're on a city street where the posted speed limit is 35 miles per hour. We fear for our children's lives in a situation like this. We've already had several close calls where if one of us adults hadn't been there to yell to the kids that a car was bearing down on them, they could have been hit! What makes this stretch of road particularly dangerous for the kids biking or playing along side it is that the three driveways for these families are really blind drives as you either come up the hill traveling south on Century Ave. toward Carver or as you come up the hill on Carver heading east and running into Century (see map). The three families concerned have a combined total of nine children. That is a large group of children to worry about. What we would like to see done is to have the City of Maplewood and /or the City of Woodbury (I'm not sure exactly where the dividing lines are between these two cities) put up two signs that say "WATCH CHILDREN" to alert traffic traveling in either direction to do just that - slow down and watch for children. (See attached map for proposed sites for these two signs.) I think that both of these signs would be put up by Maplewood. But as I said before, I'm not sure where the dividing lines are that separate Maplewood from Woodbury, so that's why I'm writing to both city offices in regards to this. Currently there is a sign on the south end of Century Ave. as you come up the hill traveling south toward Carver Ave. that says "LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE ". But I have had many people ask me what that means!! It can't be of much value if people can't even figure out what it's supposed to mean. The city of Maplewood put this sign up last year at my request. But it wasn't the kind of sign I asked for. I wanted them to put up a "BLIND DRIVE" sign to alert vehicles of our driveway at the top of the hill, only they said they couldn't put one like that up because it "wasn't consistent with other kinds of warning signs in the area." The message we want to convey for people coming up that hill is "There may be kids u ahead, so lease slow down and watch for them ". The "LIMITED SIGHT 61 STANCE sign doesn t do that (even a BLIND DRIVE sign wouldn't do it), but a sign that says "WATCH CHILDREN" would. Coming up the hill on Carver toward Century there are no warning signs of any kind of all. City of Maplewood Page 2 Could these signs please be put up before one of our children gets hit and maybe killed or crippled? We would like to see them go up before spring when our kids will' again be playing at the ends of our driveways and biking alongside the road. Please call me at your earliest convenience to discuss when we can expect to see this critical problem resolved. I can be reached at work Monday through Friday on 733 -3617 or at home after 5:30 P.M. on 738 -9550. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, JN n Karen Miner 1315 Century Ave. South St. Paul, MN 55119 cc: Mr. David Jessup, City Engineer City of Woodbury cc: Mr. Dwight Picha, Community Development Director City of Woodbury Other two families involved: DIERICH �J (4 K I DS) a I J w w" K 0 Z* J � U {ll J� J� Z V O w f- Z CAMP )WEND l e CA TKV e( . I ERECT HUGE HILL- H 'WATf. ruirnn c.i' Dow�J TO s`Tl✓KLINU CAKvEZ AvE aR /V Ewgy S WENSON (3 KIDS) NOTE: PLEASE PLACE THE NEW SIGNS FAR ENOUGH DOWN BOTH HILLS (ON CENTURY & CARVER) TO GIVE TRAFFIC ENOUGH TIME TO SLOW DOWN BEFORE THEY REACH OUR DRIVEWAYS AT THE TOP OF BOTH HILLS. I'M NOT SURE HOW MANY YARDS D RIVE�yA�, DOWN THE HILLS THIS WOULD EQUATE TO. D MINE�. ( Z KIDS) W Q T D Z W J N—+ "LIMITED SIGHT DISTAWCE" SIQ W ( `THIS poww i EREcT ' WATCH CHILDREN" SIGN HERE) J E w N 7� � AGENDA ITEM `�- / ............` Action by Coouoll;1 AGENDA REPORT Eodurxod~_-~-~~_� � �udl�lod [O: City Manager ~~`-~~--~~ FROM: Assistant City Engineer Dojnotod~~~.~~~~� SUBJECV Presentation of Feasibility Report and a p ta p or Public Hearing--City Projects 87-20 and 87~29 DATE: March 7, 1988 INTRODUCTION Copies of the feasibility study for improvements on Geranium Avenue from Ferndale Street to Century Avenue and Ferndale Street from Maryland Avenue to Stillwater Road are herewith transmitted" It is requested that a public hearing be scheduled as stated in the accompanying resolution. BUDGET IMPACT The total estimated cost of the recommended improvements is $243,715, which includes engineering and other indirect costs" It is proposed to recover the total project costs by assessment to benefiting property owners" The following figure shows the parcels proposed for assessment under this project" The enclosed table gives the units of each assessment item for each parcel that is proposed to be assessed. The rates for each item are as follows: Water Main Water Service Sanitary Sewer Service Street and Curb and Gutter Storm Sewer $ 24"10 per front foot $1,225.00 each $1 each $ 57"13 per front foot $ 0.0537 per square foot L Y�AN0— •A-- E:a,�.:;- � -------- -� - - n.33 oo loo 1.6 ua J 13 `C \I� orr I (b I ( ( Cb) N (S) In ( I C �w <2) I 10 o t .If' / " 11 I I I I9 111 low i s LL 2 " to 91 to 1J5� o `lor I �1 bg 7°D �1 n I N 16 i� 15 rr115 -°?I.� /� 1� Y L_9.aac_ ' n too /e .4' 2.1 IO J •� 4 _ 49, . 10 L .- 1J5 ils 'r a\C� to 5 W 9 too \ 1 45 - 9 1.4 r 115 \ \1 \d. 8 I `I'O 6 CUp 135 . 0 1 °. 6 25L� r d 1 r.+ / w� (an J a \1'1115 ,I. \\ s��}� st � � 41 0 ly F OIL •� i� /1f ��/� \�� ^ \ (.14� 05 (46) 11 29 . 1 e�,.a�l'tJ.i.iL' . ��. 1 ✓< �6 \ \� Cw) �♦�♦ \7 e / 60 v LYE { o]t n) , \a6` + \,.' ��\ 7"Z \ \ ` °o (50) \ \\ a a x \ q n '° ` • '' ��� ♦, a \\ Cs) � C *) � ^ Cz) � — p / p Yeti � \ .S '° 8 o any. ^x ' 1 C9) \\ �� \``� \\ \ / 1 � �'' Ian 400. C57) ZG PROJECT NO. 87 -20 GERANIUM IMPROVEMENTS QUANTITY CHECK LIST PAGE 1 OF 1 03 -08 -1988 COL. 1) = WATER MAIN - FF COL. 2) = WATER SERVICES) - EA COL. 3) = SANITARY SERVICE(S) - EA COL. 4) = STREETS - FF COL. 5) = STORM SEWER - SF PIN NO. COL 1 COL 2 COL 3 COL 4 COL 5 25- 29 -22 -11 -0001 0.000 0.000 0.000 250.000 0.000 25- 29 -22 -11 -0016 115.000 1.000 0.000 115.000 31860.000 25- 29 -22 -11 -0017 115.000 1.000 0.000 115.000 29785.000 25- 29 -22 -11 -0018 300.000 3.000 0.000 300.000 68700.000 25- 29 -22 -11 -0019 100.000 1.000 0.000 100.000 20100.000 25- 29 -22 -11 -0020 100.000 1.000 0.000 100.000 19493.000 25- 29 -22 -11 -0021 78.920 1.000 0.000 78.920 15770.000 25- 29 -22 -11 -0022 100.000 1.000 0.000 100.000 17000.000 25- 29 -22 -11 -0023 0.000 0.000 0.000 351.840 80150.000 25- 29 -22 -11 -0024 100.000 1.000 0.000 100.000 16400.000 25- 29 -22 -11 -0025 125.000 1.000 0.000 125.000 25250.000 25- 29 -22 -11 -0026 75.000 1.000 0.000 75.000 17775.000 25- 29 -22 -11 -0027 100.000 1.000 0.000 100.000 26400.000 25- 29 -22 -11 -0028 100.000 1.000 1.000 100.000 28700.000 25- 29 -22 -11 -0029 100.000 1.000 1.000 100.000 41396.000 25- 29 -22 -11 -0030 100.000 1.000 1.000 100.000 35765.000 25- 29 -22 -11 -0031 110.000 1.000 0.000 110.000 33360.000 25- 29 -22 -11 -0036 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 29859.000 25- 29 -22 -11 -0037 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 30000.000 25- 29- 22-11 -0038 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 30000.000 25- 29 -22 -11 -0039 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 30000.000 25- 29- 22 --11 -0040 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 30000.000 25- 29 -22 -11 -0041 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 30000.000 25- 29 -22 -11 -0042 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 30000.000 25- 29- 22- 11-0043 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 30000.000 25- 29 -22 -11 -0044 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 30000.000 25- 29- 22-•11 -0045 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 30000.000 25- 29 -22 -11 -0046 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 30000.000 GRAND TOTALS 1718.920 17.000 3.000 2320.760 837763.000 PAGE.' I OF' I 171;3 88 GRAND TOTALS 28 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE(S) SANITARY SERVICES) STREETS STORM SEWER QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT * * ** *1,718.920 FF AT ** *$24.010 EA. = ** *$41,271.27 * * * * * ** *17.000 EA AT $1,225.000 EA. = ***$20,825.00 * * * * * * ** *3.000 EA AT $1,285.000 EA. = * ** *$3,855.00 * * ** *2,320.760 FF AT ** *$57.130 EA. = * *$132,585.02 ** *837,763.000 SF AT * ** *$0.054 EA. = ** *$44,987.87 TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED FOR THIS PROJECT = * *$243,524.16 PROJECT NO. 87 -20 GERANIUM IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT SUMMARY SEC- 25- T- 29- R- 22 -00 -11 28 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT WATER MAIN - -- * * ** *1,718.9 20 FF AT ** #$24.010 EA. = ** *$41,271.2227 WATER SERVICE(S) * * * * * ** *17.000 EA AT $1,225.000 EA. = ** *$20,825.00 SANITARY SERVICE(S) * * * * * * ** *3.000 EA AT $1,285.000 EA. = * ** *$3,855.00 STREETS * * ** *2,320.760 FF AT ** *$57.130 EA. = * *$132,585.02 STORM SEWER ** *837,763.000 SF AT * ** *$0.054 EA. = ** *$44,987.87 GRAND TOTALS 28 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE(S) SANITARY SERVICES) STREETS STORM SEWER QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT * * ** *1,718.920 FF AT ** *$24.010 EA. = ** *$41,271.27 * * * * * ** *17.000 EA AT $1,225.000 EA. = ***$20,825.00 * * * * * * ** *3.000 EA AT $1,285.000 EA. = * ** *$3,855.00 * * ** *2,320.760 FF AT ** *$57.130 EA. = * *$132,585.02 ** *837,763.000 SF AT * ** *$0.054 EA. = ** *$44,987.87 TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED FOR THIS PROJECT = * *$243,524.16 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of Geranium Avenue from Ferndale Street to Century Avenue and Ferndale Street from Maryland Avenue to Stillwater Road, City Project 87-20 and 87-29 by construction of water main, service connections, storm sewer, street and curb and gutter, and related work, and WHEREAS, the said city engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1^ The report of the city engineer advising this council that the proposed improvement on Geranium Avenue from Ferndale Street to Century Avenue and Ferndale Street from Maryland Avenue to Stillwater Road by construction of water main, service connections, storm sewer, street with curb and gutter, and related work is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2" The council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to MBA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $243,715" 3. A public hearing will be held in the council chambers of the city hall at 1830 East County Road B on Monday, the eleventh day of April, 1988, at 7 p"m" to consider said improvement. The city clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. AGENDA ITEM I - e MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM. Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Presentation of Feasibility Report Public Hearing - -City Project 87 -19 DATE: March 7, 1988 INTRODUCTION Aotlon by Council:l Endorsed Modified — Re j ecte and RequestDtVr The feasibility report for improvements on Boxwood Avenue from McKnight Road to Dorland Road is herewith transmitted. It is requested that a public hearing be scheduled as stated on the accompanying resolution. BUDGET IMPACT The total estimated cost of the recommended improvements is $248,020, which includes engineering and other indirect costs. It is proposed to finance the entire project cost, except for the water main interconnection to Snowshoe Lane, by assessment to benefiting properties. The enclosed table gives the assessment units for each parcel. Proposed assessment rates are as follows: Sanitary Sewer Main Sanitary Sewer Service Water Main Water Service Water Service (nonresidential) Water Service (auto fire) Street with Curb and Gutter and Storm Sewer $ 11.83 per front foot 844.30 each 25.42 per front foot 845.80 each 1,095.00 each 2,500.00 each 66.90 per front foot Since the proposed interconnection between Snowshoe Lane and Boxwood Avenue with the water main will benefit most of Water District 9, it is proposed that this cost be financed from Fund 203, hydrant charge fund. The estimated total cost to provide the recommended interconnection of water mains is $21,630. is PAGE: 1 OF j 03°- 08...19813 PROJECT NO. 87 -19 BOXWOOD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT SUMMARY SEC- 13- T- 28- R- •22 -0-33 2 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT ----- -- - - - - -- -- -- - - -- ... -._ _... -- ---- --- -- SANITARY SEWER MAIN * * ** *1,035.000 FF AT ** *$11.830 EA. _ SANITARY SERVICE(S) * * * * * ** *11.000 EA AT * *$844.300 EA. _ ** *$12,244.05 WATER MAIN * * ** *1,035.000 FF AT ** *$25.420 EA. = * ** *$9,287.30 WATER SERVICES) 1" * * * * * ** *11.000 EA AT * *$845.800 EA. _ WATER SERVICE(S) 2" * * * * * * ** *0.000 EA AT $1,095.000 EA. _ WATER SERVICES) 6" * * * * * * ** *0.00@ EA AT $2,500.000 EA. _ STREETS * * ** *1,035.000 FF AT ** *$66.900 EA. _ ** *$69,241.50 SEC- 24- T- 28- R- 22 -00-22 2 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT --- ---- - - - - -- ---- ---- - - - - -- -- ---- - - - --• ----- -- - -- - -- SANITARY SEWER MAIN * * * * ** *905.000 FF AT ** *$11.830 EA. ** *$10,706.15 SANITARY SERVICE(S) * * * * * * ** *3.000 EA AT * *$844.300 EA. _ * ** *$2,532.90 WRYER MAIN * * * * ** *905. @0@ FF AT ** *$25.420 EA. _ WATER SERVICE(S) 1" * * * * * * ** *2.000 EA AT * *$845.800 EA. _ WATER SERVICES) 2" * * * * * * ** *1.000 EA AT $1,095.000 EA. WATER SERVICES) 6" * * * * * * ** *1.000 EA AT $2,500.000 EA. * ** *$2,500.00 STREETS * * * * ** *905.000 FF AT ** *$66.900 EA. _ ** *$60,544.50 GRAND TOTALS 4 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT -------------------- ------- --- -- -- -- ---------- -------------- SANITARY SEWER MAIN * * ** *1,940.000 FF AT ** *$11.830 EA. _ * *• *$22, 950.2@ SANITARY SERVICE(S) * * * * * ** *14.000 EA AT * *$844.300 EA. _ WATER MAIN * * ** *1,940.000 FF AT ** *$25.420 EA. _ ** *$49,314.80 WATER SERVICE(S) 1" * * * * * ** *13.000 EA AT * *$845.800 EA. _ WATER SERVICE(S) 2" * * * * * * ** *1.000 EA AT $1,095.000 EA. _ * * *$1 0,995.40 WATER SERVICE(S) 6" * * * * * * ** *1.000 EA AT $2,500.000 EA. _ STREETS * * ** *1,940.000 FF AT ** *$66.900 EA. _ * *$129,786.00 TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED FOR THIS PROJECT = * *$228,461.60 PROJECT NO. 87 -19 BOXWOOD IVAROVEIENTS PAGE OF JL 03- 08-1985 OIWaRITY CHECK LIST COL. 1) = SANITARY SEWER MAIN - FF COL. 2) = SANITARY SERVICE(S) - EA Col. 3) = WATER VAIN - FF COL. 4) = WATER SERVICES) IN - EA COL. 5) = WATER SERVICES) 2° - EA COL. 6) = WATER SERVICES) 6 - EA COL. 7) = STREETS - FF PIN NO. COL 1 COL 2 COL 3 COI. 4 COI. 5 COL 6 COI. 7 13- 28 -22 -33 -0001 815.00 9.00 815.00 9.00 0.00 0.00 815.00 13- 28 -22 -33 -0002 220.00 2.00 220.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 220.00 24- 28 -22 -22 -0013 614.00 1.00 614.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 614.00 24-28 -22 -22 -0035 291.00 2.00 291.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 291.00 GRAND TOTALS 1940.00 14.00 1940.00 13.00 1.00 1.00 1940.00 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of Boxwood Avenue from McKnight Road to Dorland Road, City Project 87-19 by construction of sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water main, service connections, street with curb and gutter, and associated work, and WHEREAS, the said city engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA, as follows: 1" The report of the city engineer advising this council that the proposed improvement on Boxwood Avenue from McKnight Road to Dorland Road by construction of sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water main, service connections, street with curb and gutter, and associated work is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received" 2^ The council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $248,020" 3" A public hearing will be held in the council chambers of the city hall at 1830 East County Road B on Monday, the eleventh day of April, 1988 at 7:10 p.m" to consider said improvement" The city clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law" Endorsed®.,..®.._. Modif iedw— Rejecte Date --- - 'NIENDA ITEM L r MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Present Feasibility Report City Project 87 -21. DATE: March 8, 1988 and Schedule Public Hearing INTRODUCTION The feasibility study for the ski jump property storm sewer is transmitted herewith. It is requested that a public hearing be scheduled for this project as stated in the attached resolution. BUDGET IMPACT The total estimated cost of the recommended improvement is $152,150, including engineering and other indirect costs. The Minnesota Department of Transportation has area within the Interstate Highway 494 right -of -way which is tributary to the drainage area of this project. MnDOT has been requested to review whether cost sharing of this improvement is appropriate. If MnDOT participates in the funding for this project then the estimated assessment rates will be less than presented herein. It is proposed to assess the owners of property tributary to the drainage area for the costs of the project which are not funded by cost sharing with MnDOT. Although estimated costs for proposed storm sewers to connect to the ski jump pond are presented in the feasibility report, it is not intended that the construction of these connecting storm sewers be included in the ski jump property storm sewer project. The estimates of connecting storm sewers from the proposed Maplewood Highlands and Highwood Estates plats to the ski jump pond were included so that the combined cost of storm water conveyance, in addition to ponding and discharge, could be evaluated for each alternative investigated. It is intended that these storm sewers be constructed by the respective developers prior to construction of the access road. The proposed assessments are as follows. The assessments are proportioned by percentages of total run off tributary to the pond. A run -off coefficient is multiplied times the area of each property to reflect the differing run off from park or open space versus residential development. These proposed assessments equate to the cost per gross square foot of property as follows: Property Pleasantview Park Maplewood Highlands Ski Jump Highwood Estates Cents Assessment per Gross Square Foot 2.4 4.7 2.4 4.7 East of Highwood Estates 4.7 (13- 28 -22 -41 -0013) West of Highwood Estates 4.7 (13- 28 -22 -31 -0064) It is intended that the assessment attributable to Pleasantview Park be paid through PAC funds or other source as designated by the director of parks and recreation. i Area sb Total Proposed Property Acres Run Off Assessment Pleasantview Park 7.0 4.8 5 7,300 Maplewood Highlands 16.5 22.3 33,930 Ski Jump 13.8 9.5 14,450 Highwood Estates 37.3 50.3 76,530 East of Highwood Estates 8.3 11.1 16,890 (13- 28 -22 -41 -0013) West of Highwood Estates 1.6 2.0 3,050 (13- 28 -22 -31 -0064 Totals 84.5 100.0 $152,150 These proposed assessments equate to the cost per gross square foot of property as follows: Property Pleasantview Park Maplewood Highlands Ski Jump Highwood Estates Cents Assessment per Gross Square Foot 2.4 4.7 2.4 4.7 East of Highwood Estates 4.7 (13- 28 -22 -41 -0013) West of Highwood Estates 4.7 (13- 28 -22 -31 -0064) It is intended that the assessment attributable to Pleasantview Park be paid through PAC funds or other source as designated by the director of parks and recreation. i RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of ski jump property storm sewer, City Project 87 -21 by construction of storm sewers, ponding area, pumping station, force main, access road, and appurtenances, and WHEREAS, the said city engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the city engineer advising this council that the proposed improvement on ski jump property storm sewer by construction of storm sewers, ponding area, pumping station, force main, access road, and appurtenances is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $152,150. 3. A public hearing will be held in the council chambers of the city hall at 1830 East County Road B on Monday, the eleventh day of April, 1988, at 7:20 p.m. to consider said improvement. The city clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. Action by Council:) Endorsed — Modifie Rejected — - Datem s AGENDA ITEM �1 /6 TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City SUBJECT: MSA Off- System DATE: March 8, 1988 INTRODUCTION Engineer Resolution for County Road C Municipal state -aid funds may be used to fund Maplewood's share of the costs for street and storm sewer construction on the proposed upgrading of County Road C east of White Bear Avenue by Ramsey County. To utilize MSA funds on County Road C. which is a county state -aid highway and not a designated municipal state -aid route, it is necessary to adopt a resolution to transfer funds from the city's MSA account and appropriate them to this project. The attached resolution transfers MSA funds to the County Road C project. ACTION REQUIRED Adopt the attached resolution. is Attachment RESOLUTION CITY OF MAPLEWOOD WHEREAS, it has been deemed advisable and necessary for the City of Maplewood to participate in the cost of a construction project located on CSAH No. 23 within the limits of said municipality, and WHEREAS, said construction project has been approved by the commissioner of transportation and identified in his records as SAP 62^~623-30, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that we do hereby appropriate from our municipal state-aid street funds the sum of 64,042"66 dollars to apply toward the construction of said project and request the commissioner of transportation to approve this authorization" AGENDA ITEM -Z " .ale. C [AMY by roiinoi, 1. MEMORANDUM Endorsed_ ___,_, Modified - -.. TO: City Manager Rejecte - FROM: Assistant City Engineer Date—. SUBJECT: Parking Restrictions on Proposed Sterling Street DATE: March 8, 1988 INTRODUCTION Since Sterling Street from Highwood Avenue to Hillwood Street is planned for construction with a width of 36 feet measured from face of curb to face of curb, it is necessary to prohibit motor vehicle parking on one side to obtain Municipal State Aid approval and funding. The attached resolution prohibits parking on the west side. The west side was selected for the parking ban since the sidewalk is on this side of the street. ACTION REQUIRED Adopt the attached resolution. iw Attachment RESOLUTION RESTRICTING PARKING ALONG PROPOSED STERLING STREET FROM HIGHWOOD AVENUE TO HILLWOOD STREET WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has planned the construction of Sterling Street from Highwood Avenue to Hillwood Street; and WHEREAS, the City will be expending Municipal State Aid funds (M.S.A. Project Number 138 - 120 -01) on the improvement of said street; and WHEREAS, said improvement does not conform to the approved minimum width standards with unrestricted parking; and WHEREAS, approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid project is dependent upon specified parking restrictions. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HERESY RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood prohibits the parking of motor vehicles on the west side of proposed Sterling Street from Highwood Avenue to Hillwood Street. Action by Counoil.:l Endorsed.,... —_— Modified. Rejecte Date -- AGENDA ITEM T / Z TO: City Manager FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: Bus Route Change - -Beam Avenue DATE: March 8, 1988 The MTC has requested the city to approve a bus route on Beam Avenue from McKnight Road to White Bear Avenue. Beam Avenue in this area is constructed to a nine ton design and can handle the bus loading. Since buses do not use Beam Avenue presently, abutting residents may have concern about the additional traffic. Notices of the meeting will be sent to residents along Beam Avenue. is P 5r] M E T R O P O L I T A N T R A N S I T C O M M I S S I O N 560 -6th Avenue North, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55411 -4398 612/349 -7400 February 22, 1988 Mr. Ken Haider City Engineer City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Haider: The MTC's Service Planning and Scheduling Section staff have been receiving requests from commuters who live in the City of Maplewood in the Beam Avenue/McKnight Road neighborhood. They seek a new more direct express bus route between their homes and downtown St. Paul. The best route we have been able to design would follow McKnight Road to Beam Avenue to Highway 61. Up to six one -way bus trips per weekday would follow Beam Avenue between White Bear Avenue and McKnight Road., The MTC requires written permission from the City of Maplewood before buses may follow this section of city street. Bus stops would be requested at the following locations on Beam Avenue: Eastbound On Beam Avenue At: Frederick Street N.S. Furness St. N.S. Westbound On Beam Avenue At: Furness St. N.S. Frederick St. N.S. White Bear Avenue N.S. N.S.: near side stop. F.S.: far side stop. Bus stop signs may be obtained from Mr. Glenn Peterson, Senior Transit Supervisor for your -area at 642 -2666. If the city approves, the new express route might begin operations by midyear. If you have any questions or concerns, do not hesitate to call me at 349 -7773. Thank you for your prompt attention to this request. Sincerely, ,�.��� John Dillery Transit Planner JD /crf/3247 cc: Glenn Peterson n Q,+ 100 AGENDA ITEM lic a i.on by Council:i TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: INTRODUCTION City Manager City Engineer City Hall Final Payment March 8, 1988 Endorsed— Modifie Rejected Date. — Attached is a copy of architect's recommendation for final payment to Knutson Construction, Inc. The work is complete according to the plans and specifications. BACKGROUND The city occupied the building in September, 1986. Since that time repair work has been performed on many of the building systems. The heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) system has been of particular concern. The system has been constructed according to the plans and specifications. For this reason the contractor should be paid according to the contract. An independent engineering the adequacy of design for subject should be availabl ALTERNATIVES 1. Make final payment to 2. Postpone or refuse to DISCUSSIONS firm has been contacted to evaluate the HVAC system. Information on this a within the next month. Knutson Construction, Inc. make final payment. Knutson Construction has requested final payment several times in the past year. Each time they have been refused. Since the architect has stated Knutson Construction, Inc. has completed everything called for in the plans and specifications, the city has little choice but to make final payment. If the city postpones or refuses contractor will likely have cause city. RECOMMENDATION to make final payment, the for legal action against the It is recommended the city council authorize final payment for city hall to Knutson Construction, Inc. in the amount of $29,000. Architectural Alliance 400 Clifton Avenue South. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 (612) 871 -5703 Architecture Planning • Interior Design • Energy Design Mr. Dan Faust Finance Director City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 January 8, 1988 Re: New City Hall /Public Safety Facility Fourteenth (Final Payment) Dear Mr. Faust: Please find enclosed herein (2) copies of the fourteenth (and final) Application and Certificate of Payment from Knutson Construction, Inc., the Contractor for the new City Hall /Public Safety Facility. We have reviewed the Application and recommend that the City of Maplewood issue a payment to Knutson Construction, Inc. in the amount of $29,000.00. The contractor has now completed all outstanding punch list items. Please call if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, W PETER VESTERHOLT, AIA Principal PC /smr Enclosure cc: Haider w /enc. Grismer w /enc. Ketcham Mlnnoapolls /Saint Paul • Twin Cities International Airport • Phoenix AGENDA ITEM -T` IX MEMORANDUM :GariAont by Ouunoilt Endorsed---- TO: City Manager Modified_.„,„, FROM: City Engineer RcJecte _ SUBJECT: TH 120 Signal Agreement 64515 Date DATE: March 8, 1988 Attached is the signal agreement between Maplewood, MnDOT, Ramsey and Washington Counties, North St. Paul, Oakdale and Woodbury. The agreement provides for cost sharing and maintenance responsibility for signal systems, street lighting and emergency vehicle preemption (EVP) at the following intersections along TH 120 (Century Avenue): 1. Upper Afton Road 2. Conway Avenue 3. Seventh Street 4. Minnehaha Avenue- County Road 70 -10th Street 5. Harvester Avenue -15th Street 6. TH 5- Stillwater Avenue 7. Larpenteur Avenue 8. South Avenue -40th Street MnDOT's share of the construction cost for signals at each location is approximately 90%. The remaining signal costs are split among the various agencies involved at each intersection. The EVP costs are separate and split along the cities at each intersection. Maintenance is also split among the various agencies. The agreement identifies the exact responsibilities for each agency at each intersection. The estimated cost for Maplewood's share of the construction is $32,778.82. The 1988 street construction state aid has $40,000 budgeted for this purpose. It is recommended that the city council adopt the attached resolution approving the agreement. is Attachment MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT NO. 64515 BETWEEN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE COUNTY OF RAMSEY AND THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON AND THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD AND THE CITY OF OAKDALE AND THE CITY OF WOODBURY AND THE CITY OF NORTH ST. PAUL FOR Removal of one (1) existing Hazard Identification Beacon and three (3) existing temporary Traffic Control Signals, and Installation of nine (9) new or permanent Traffic Control Signals with Street Lights, Emergency Vehicle Pre - emption, and Signing at various locations on Trunk Highway No. 120 in the Cities of Maplewood and North St. Paul, Ramsey County, and the Cities of Oakdale and Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota. S.P. 6227 -43 S.P. 62- 625 -16, 62- 630 -34 and 62- 634 -02 S.A.P. 138 - 103 -10, 138 - 114 -01 and 192 - 110 -01 F.P. HES 5021(5) Prepared by Traffic Engineering AMOUNT ENCUMBERED None Otherwise Covered r ESTIMATED AMOUNT RECEIVABLE THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the "State ", and the County of Ramsey, hereinafter referred to as "Ramsey County ", and the County of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "Washington County ", and the City of Maplewood, hereinafter referred to as "Maplewood ", and the City of Oakdale, hereinafter referred to as "Oakdale ", and the City of Woodbury, hereinafter referred to as "Woodbury ", and the City of North St. Paul, hereinafter referred to as "North St. Paul ", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the State has determined that there is justification and it is in the public's best interest to install new traffic control signals with street lights, emergency vehicle pre - emption, and signing on Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue) at Upper Afton Road, on Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) at 7th Street North and at Harvester Avenue - 15th Street North, on Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) /Trunk Highway No. 5 at County State Aid Highway No. 30 (Larpenteur Avenue), and on Trunk Highway No. 120 (Geneva Avenue /Division Street) at County State Aid Highway No. 25 (South Avenue) - 40th Street North; remove the existing hazard identification beacon and install a new traffic control signal with street lights, emergency vehicle pre - emption and 64515 -1- C_ .v signing on Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) at Conway Avenue; remove the existing temporary traffic control signals and install permanent traffic control signals with street lights, emergency vehicle pre - emption, and signing on Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) at County State Aid Highway No. 34 (East Minnehaha Avenue) - County Road No. 70 (10th Street North), and on Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) - Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) /Trunk Highway No. 5 at Trunk Highway No. 5 (South Junction) [Stillwater Road) - County State Aid Highway No. 6 (Stillwater Boulevard North) and at Trunk Highway No. 5 (North Junction); and WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the new or permanent traffic control signals with street lights, emergency vehicle pre - emption, and signing work on Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue.) at Conway Avenue, at 7th Street North, at County State Aid Highway No. 34 (East Minnehaha Avenue) - County Road No. 70 (10th Street North); on Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) - Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) /Trunk Highway No. 5 at Trunk Highway No. 5 (South Junction) [Stillwater Road] - County State Aid Highway No. 6 (Stillwater Boulevard North); and on Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) /Trunk Highway No. 5 at County State Aid Highway No. 30 (Larpenteur Avenue), and on Trunk 64515 -2- Highway No. 120 (Geneva Avenue /Division Street) at County State Aid Highway No. 25 (South Avenue) - 40th Street North are eligible for 90 percent Hazard Elimination Safety Funds; and WHEREAS, Maplewood, Oakdale, Woodbury and North St. Paul request and the State agrees to provide Emergency Vehicle Pre - emption Systems, hereinafter referred to as the "EVP Systems ", as a part of said new or permanent traffic control signals with street lights and signing installations in accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the materials, equipment, labor and miscellaneous items necessary to construct, operate, maintain, revise and remove said EVP Systems shall be at the sole cost and expense of Maplewood, Oakdale, Woodbury or North St. Paul; and WHEREAS, it is considered in the public's best interest for the State to provide pedestal shafts and bases for one (1) permanent and three (3) new traffic control signals, and new cabinets and control equipment to operate six (6) new and three (3) permanent traffic control signals; and WHEREAS, Ramsey County, Washington County, Maplewood, Oakdale, Woodbury, North St. Paul and the State will participate in the cost, maintenance and operation of the new and /or permanent traffic control. signals with street lights, EVP Systems, and signing as hereafter set forth; 64515 -3- NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The State shall prepare the necessary plan, specifications and proposal and shall perform the engineering and inspection required to complete the items of work hereinafter set forth. Such work as described immediately above shall constitute "Engineering and Inspection" and shall be so referred to hereinafter. 2. The contract cost of the work or, if the work is not contracted, the cost of all labor, materials, and equipment rental required to complete the work, except the cost of providing the power supply to the service poles or pads, shall constitute the actual "Construction Cost" and shall be so referred to hereinafter. 3. Costs for EVP Systems control and interface equipment, cables, detectors and lights for the new or permanent traffic control signals provided for herein shall be paid by each respective party at its sole cost and expense. 4. The State with its own forces and equipment or by contract shall perform the traffic control signal work provided for under State Project No. 6227 -43, State Project No.'s 62- 625 -16, 62- 630 -34 and 62- 634 -02, State Aid Project No.'s 138 - 101 -10, 138- 114 -01 and 192- 110 -01, and Federal -aid Project No. HES 5021(5) with the Construction Costs shared as follows: 64515 -4- a. Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue) at Upper Afton Road. S.A.P. 138- 114 -01 and 192 - 110 -01. System "A ". Install a new traffic control signal with street lights and emergency vehicle pre - emption. 1. Traffic Control Signal. Estimated Construction Cost is $68,150.50 which: 1) includes State furnished materials (excluding EVP System control and interface equipment) and 2) excludes EVP System materials (cable, detectors and lights). State's share is 88.37 percent. Maplewood's share is 5.815 percent. Woodbury's share is 5.815 percent. 2. EVP System. Estimated Construction Cost is $5,290.00 which includes: 1) EVP System materials (cable, detectors and lights) and 2) State furnished materials (EVP System control and interface equipment). Maplewood's share is 50 percent. Woodbury's share is 50 percent. 64515 -5- mo , I b. Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) at Conway Avenue. S.A.P. 138- 101 -10. System "B ". Remove the existing hazard identification beacon and install a new traffic control signal with street lights and emergency vehicle pre - emption. 1. Traffic Control Signal. F.P. HE$ 5021(5). Estimated Construction Cost is $56,612.00 which: 1) includes State furnished materials (excluding EVP System control and interface equipment) and 2) excludes EVP System materials (cable, detectors and lights). Anticipated Federal -aid share is 90 percent. Anticipated State's share is 6.67 percent. Maplewood's share is 3.33 percent. 2. EVP System. Estimated Construction Cost is $5,398.00 which includes: 1) EVP System materials (cable, detectors and lights) and 2) State furnished materials (EVP System control and interface equipment). Maplewood's share is 100 percent. 64515 -6- w C. Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) at 7th Street North. System "C ". Install a new traffic control signal with street lights and emergency vehicle pre - emption. 1. Traffic Control Signal. F.P. HES 5021(5). Estimated Construction Cost is $52,049.25 which: 1) includes State furnished materials (excluding EVP System control and interface equipment) and 2) excludes EVP System materials (cable, detectors and lights). Anticipated Federal -aid share is 90 percent. Anticipated State's share is 6.67 percent. Oakdale's share is 3.33 percent. 2. EVP System. Estimated Construction Cost is $5,285.50 which includes: 1) EVP System materials (cable, detectors and lights) and 2) State furnished materials (EVP System control and interface equipment). Oakdale's share is 100 percent. 64515 -7- L �� , d. Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) at County State Aid Highway No. 34 (East Minnehaha Avenue) - County Road No. 70 (10th Street North). S.P. 62- 634 -02. System "D ". Remove the existing temporary traffic control signal and install a permanent traffic control signal with street .lights and emergency vehicle pre - emption. 1. Traffic Control Signal. F.P. HES 5021(5). Estimated Construction Cost is $79,047.00 which: 1) includes State furnished materials (excluding EVP System control and interface equipment) and 2) excludes EVP System materials (cable, detectors and lights). Anticipated Federal -aid Share is 90 percent. Anticipated State's share is 5.0 percent. Ramsey County's share is 2.5 percent. Washington County's share is 2.5 percent. 2. EVP System. Estimated Construction Cost is $5,357.50 which includes: 1) EVP System materials (cable, detectors and lights) and 2) State furnished materials 64515 -8- (EVP System control and interface equipment). Maplewood's share is 50 percent. Oakdale's share is 50 percent. e. Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) at Harvester Avenue - 15th Street North. System "E ". Install a new traffic control signal with street lights and emergency vehicle pre - emption. 1. Traffic Control Signal. Estimated Construction Cost is $65,280.00 which: 1) includes State furnished materials (excluding EVP System control and interface equipment) and 2) excludes EVP System materials (cable, detectors and lights). State's share is 88.37 percent. Maplewood's share is 5.815 percent. Oakdale's share is 5.815 percent. 2. EVP System. Estimated Construction Cost is $5,267.50 which includes: 1) EVP System materials (cable, detectors and lights) and 2) State furnished materials (EVP System control and interface equipment). Maplewood's share is 50 percent. Oakdale's share is 50 percent. 64515 f. Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) - Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) /Trunk Highawy No. 5 at Trunk Highway No. 5 (South Junction) [Stillwater Road] - County State Aid Highway No. 6 (Stillwater Boulevard North). System "F ". Remove the existing temporary traffic control signal and install a permanent traffic control signal with street lights and emergency vehicle pre - emption. 1. Traffic Control Signal. F.P. HES 5021(5). Estimated Construction Cost is $76,299.50 which: 1) includes State furnished materials (excluding EVP System control and interface equipment) and 2) excludes EVP System materials (cable, detectors and lights). Anticipated Federal -aid share is 90 percent. Anticipated State's share is 7.5 percent. Washington County's share is 2.5 percent. 64515 -10- W- 2. EVP System. Estimated Construction Cost is $5,384.50 which includes: 1) EVP System materials (cable, detectors and lights) and 2) State furnished materials (EVP System control and interface equipment). Maplewood's share is 50 percent. Oakdale's share is 50 percent. g. Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) /Trunk Highway No. 5 at County State Aid Highway No. 30 (Larpenteur Avenue). S.P. 62- 630 -34. System "G ". Install a new traffic control signal with street lights and emergency vehicle pre- emption. 1. Traffic Control Signal. F.P. HES 5021(5). Estimated Construction Cost is $55,883.00 which: 1) includes State furnished materials (excluding EVP System control and interface equipment) and 2) excludes EVP System materials (cable, detectors and lights). Anticipated Federal -aid share is 90 percent. Anticipated State's share is 6.67 percent. Ramsey County's share is 3.33 percent. 64515 -11- 2. EVP System. Estimated Construction Cost is $5,231.50 which includes: 1) EVP System materials (cable, detectors and lights) and 2) State furnished materials (EVP System control and interface equipment). Maplewood's share is 100 percent. h. Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) - Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) /Trunk Highway No. 5 at Trunk Highway No. 5 (North Junction). System "H ". Remove the existing temporary traffic control signal and install a permanent traffic control siana.l with street lights and emergency vehicle pre - emption. 1. Traffic Control Signal. Estimated Construction Cost is $68,296.25 which: 1) includes State furnished materials (excluding EVP System control and interface equipment) and 2) excludes EVP System materials (cable, detectors and lights). State's share is 100 percent. 64515 -12- J11� 2. EVP System. Estimated Construction Cost is $5,380.00 which includes: 1) EVP System materials (cable, detectors and lights) and 2) State furnished materials (EVP System control and interface equipment). Oakdale's share is 100 percent. i. Trunk Highway No. 120 (Geneva Avenue /Division Street) at County State Aid Highway No. 25 (South Avenue) - 40th Street North. S.P. 62- 625 -16. System "I ". Install a new traffic control signal with street lights and emergency vehicle pre - emption. 1. Traffic Control Signal. F.P. HES 5021(5). Estimated Construction Cost is $64,507.25 which: 1) includes State furnished materials (excluding EVP System control and interface equipment) and 2) excludes EVP System materials (cable, detectors and lights). Anticipated Federal -aid share is 90 percent. Anticipated State's share is 5 percent. Ramsey County's share is 2.5 percent. Oakdale's share is 2.5 percent. 64515 -13- n 2. EVP System. Estimated Construction Cost is $5,263.00 which includes: 1) EVP System materials (cable, detectors and lights) and 2) State furnished materials (EVP System control and interface equipment). Oakdale's share is 66.67 percent. North St. Paul's share is 33.33 percent. 5. The State shall install or cause the installation of overhead signing and shall maintain said signing all at no cost to Ramsey County, Washington County, Maplewood, Oakdale, Woodbury, or North St. Paul. 6. Upon execution of this agreement and a request in writing by the State, Ramsey County, Washington County, Maplewood, Oakdale, Woodbury, and North St. Paul shall each advance to the State an amount equal to their portion of the project costs. Ramsey County's, Washington County's, Maplewood's, Oakdale's, Woodbury's, and North St. Paul's total portion shall consist of the sum of the following: a. Each respective share (as specified in Paragraph 4) based on the actual bid prices and the estimated State furnished materials costs. b. Six (6) percent of each respective share 64515 -14- [Item (a) above] for the cost of Engineering and Inspection. 7. Upon completion and final acceptance of the project, Ramsey County's, Washington County's, Maplewood's, Oakdale's, Woodbury's and North St. Paul's final share shall consist of the sum of the following; a. Each respective final share, based on the final payment to the Contractor and the actual State furnished materials costs. b. Six (6) percent of each respective final share [Item (a) above] for the cost of Engineering and Inspection. The amount of the funds advanced by Ramsey County, Washington County, Maplewood, Oakdale, Woodbury, and North St. Paul in excess of each respective final share will be returned to each respective party without interest and each party agrees to pay to the State that amount of its final share which is in excess of the amount of the funds advanced by Ramsey County, Washington County, Maplewood, Oakdale, Woodbury, and North St. Paul. 6. Maplewood and Woodbury shall jointly be responsible for the installation of an adequate electrical power supply to the service pad or pole, and for providing all necessary electrical power for the operation of the new traffic 64515 -15- p, L control signal with street lights installation (System "A "). Maplewood shall receive the bill for the installation of the electrical power supply and the monthly electrical bill for the new traffic control signal with street lights, and invoice Woodbury for 50 percent of the costs. 9. Upon completion of the work contemplated in Paragraph 4a (System "A ") hereof, Maplewood and Woodbury shall jointly be responsible for: (1) maintaining the luminaires; (2) relamping the new traffic control signal and street lights; and (3) cleaning and painting the new traffic control signal, cabinet and luminaire mast arm extensions. Woodbury shall perform or provide for the completion of the work, as described immediately above, and invoice Maplewood for 50 percent of the cost(s) to complete such work. It shall be the State's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to perform all other new traffic control signal and street light maintenance. 10. Maplewood shall provide an adequate electrical power supply to the service pad or pole, and upon completion of said new traffic control signal with street lights installation (System "B ") shall provide necessary electrical power for its operation at the cost and expense of Maplewood. 64515 -16- V 11. Upon completion of the work contemplated in Paragraph 4b (System "B ") hereof, it shall be Maplewood's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to: (1) maintain the luminaires; (2) relamp the new traffic control signal and street lights; and (3) clean and paint the new traffic control signal, cabinet and luminaire mast arm extensions. It shall be the State's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to perform all other new traffic control signal and street light maintenance. 12. Oakdale shall provide an adequate electrical power supply to the service pad or pole, and upon completion of said new traffic control signal with street lights installation (System "C ") shall provide necessary electrical power for its operation at the cost and expense of Oakdale. 13. Upon completion of the work contemplated in Paragraph 4c (System "C ") hereof, it shall be Oakdale's responsibility, at its cost and expense to: (1) maintain the luminaires; (2) relamp the new traffic control signal and street lights; and (3) clean and paint the new traffic control signal, cabinet and luminaire mast arm extensions. It shall be the State's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to perform all other new traffic control signal and street light maintenance. 64515 -17- 14. Ramsey County and Washington County shall jointly be responsible for the installation of an adequate electrical power supply to the service pad or pole, and for providing all necessary electrical power for the operation of the permanent traffic control signal with street lights installation (System "D "). Ramsey County shall receive the bill for the installation of the electrical power supply and the monthly electrical bill for the permanent traffic control signal with street lights, and invoice Washington County for 50 percent of the costs. 15. Upon completion of the work contemplated in Paragraph 4d (System "D ") hereof, Ramsey County and Washington County shall jointly be responsible for: (1) maintaining the luminaires; (2) relamping the permanent traffic control signal and street lights; and (3) cleaning and painting the permanent traffic control signal, cabinet and luminaire mast arm extensions. Ramsey County shall perform or provide for the completion of the work, as described immediately above, and invoice Washington County for 50 percent of the cost(s) to complete such work. it shall be the State's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to perform all other permanent traffic control signal and street light maintenance. 64515 -18- 16. Maplewood and Oakdale shall jointly be responsible for the installation of an adequate electrical power supply to the service pad or pole, and for providing all necessary electrical power for the operation of the new traffic control signal with street lights installation (System "E "). Maplewood shall receive the bill for the installati i of the electrical power supply and the monthly electrical bill for the new traffic control signal with street lights, and invoice Oakdale for 50 percent of the costs. 17. Upon completion of the work contemplated in Paragraph 4e (System "E ") hereof, Maplewood and Oakdale shall jointly be responsible for: (1) maintaining the luminaires; (2) relamping the new traffic control signal and street lights; and (3) cleaning and painting the new traffic control signal, cabinet and luminaire mast arm extensions. Maplewood shall perform or provide for the completion of the work, as described immediately above, and invoice Oakdale for 50 percent of the cost(s) to complete such work. It shall be the State's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to perform all other new traffic control signal and street light maintenance. 18. Washington County shall provide an adequate electrical power supply to the service pad or pole, and upon completion of said permanent traffic control signal with street lights installation (System "F") shall provide necessary 64515 -19- y�: electrical power for its operation at the cost and expense of Washington County. 19. Upon completion of the work contemplated in Paragraph 4f (System "F ") hereof, it shall be Washington County's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to: (1) maintain the luminaires; (2) relamp the permanent traffic control signal and street lights; and (3) clean and paint the permanent traffic control signal, cabinet and luminaire mast arm extensions. It shall be the State's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to perform all other permanent traffic control signal and street light maintenance. 20. Ramsey County shall provide an adequate electrical power supply to the service pad or pole, and upon completion of said new traffic control signal with street lights installation (System "G") shall provide necessary electrical power for its operation at the cost and expense of Ramsey County. 21. Upon completion of the work contemplated in Paragraph 4g (System "G ") hereof, it shall be Ramsey County's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to: (1) maintain the luminaires; (2) relamp the new traffic control signal and street lights; and (3) clean and paint the new traffic control signal, cabinet and luminaire mast arm extensions. It shall be the State's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to perform all other new traffic control signal and street light maintenance. 64515 -20- 22. The State shall perpetuate an adequate electrical power supply to the service pad or pole, and upon completion of said permanent traffic control signal with street lights installation (System "H ") shall continue to provide necessary electrical power for its operation at the cost and expense of the State. 23. Upon completion of the work contemplated in Paragraph 4h (System "H ") hereof, it shall be the State's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to maintain and keep in repair the permanent traffic control signal with street lights. 24. Oakdale shall provide an adequate electrical power supply to the service pad or pole, and upon completion of said new traffic control signal with street lights installation (System "I ") shall provide necessary electrical power for its operation at the cost and expense of Oakdale. 25. Upon completion of the work contemplated in Paragraph 41 (System "I ") hereof, it shall be Ramsey County's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to: (1) maintain the luminaires; (2) relamp the new traffic control signal and street lights; and (3) clean and paint the new traffic control signal, cabinet and luminaire mast arm extensions. It shall be the State's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to perform all other new traffic control signal and street light maintenance. n 64515 -21- 26. The EVP Systems provided for in paragraph 4 hereof shall be installed, operated, maintained, revised or removed in accordance with the following conditions and requirements: a. All modifications, revisions and maintenance of the EVP Systems considered necessary or desirable, for any reason, shall be done by State forces, or, upon concurrence in writing by the State's Traffic Engineer, may be done by others all at the cost and expense of the respective party (Maplewood, Oakdale, Woodbury, or North St. Paul). b. Emitter units may be installed and used only on vehicles responding to an emergency as defined in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 169.01, Subdivision 5 and 169.03. Each respective party will provide the State's District Engineer or his duly appointed representative a list of all such vehicles with emitter units. C. Each respective party shall maintain and require others using the EVP System(s) to maintain a log showing the date, time and type of emergency for each time any traffic 64515 -22- r signal covered hereby is actuated and controlled by the EVP System(s), and that said logs shall be made available to the State upon request. Malfunction of the EVP System(s) shall be reported to the State immediately. d. In the event said EVP System(s) or components are, in the opinion of the State, being misused or the conditions set forth in Paragraph b above are violated, and such issue or violation continues after receipt by said party of written notice thereof from the State, the State shall remove the EVP System(s). Upon removal of the EVP System(s) pursuant to this .paragraph, the field wiring, cabinet wiring and other components shall become the property of the State. All infrared detector heads and indicator lamps mounted external to the traffic signal cabinet will be returned to the appropriate party. The detector receiver and any other assembly located in the traffic control signal cabinet, which if removed will not 64515 -23- affect the traffic control signal operation, will be returned to the appropriate party. e. All timing of said EVP Systems shall be determined by the State, through its Commissioner of Transportation. 27. Upon proper execution by Maplewood and the State, the EVP System for the new or permanent traffic control signals on Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) at Conway Avenue and on Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) /Trunk Highway No. 5 at at County State Aid Highway No. 30 (Larpenteur Avenue) shall become a part of Signal Maintenance Agreement No. 1629 -R between Maplewood and the State covering operation, revision, maintenance and removal of EVP Systems by State forces at the cost and expense of Maplewood. 28. Upon proper execution by Oakdale and the State, the EVP Systems for the new or permanent traffic control signals on Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) at 7th. Street North and on Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) - Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) /Trunk Highway No. 5 at Trunk Highway No. 5 (North Junction) shall become a part of Signal Maintenance Agreement No. 1880 -R between Oakdale and the State covering operation, revision, maintenance and removal of EVP Systems by State forces at the cost and expense of Oakdale. 64515 -24- L' 29. Upon proper execution by Maplewood, Woodbury and the State, the EVP System for the new traffic control signal on Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue) at Upper Afton Road shall become a part of Signal Maintenance Agreement No. 1629 -R between Maplewood and the State and Signal Maintenance Agreement No. 1788 -R between Woodbury and the State. Both agreements cover operation, revision, maintenance and removal of EVP Systems by State forces, at a cost shared equally by Maplewood and Woodbury. 30. Upon proper execution by North St. Paul, Oakdale and the State, the EVP System for the new traffic control signal on Trunk Highway No. 120 (Geneva Avenue /Division Street) at County State Aid Highway No. 25 (South Avenue) - 40th Street North shall become a part of Signal Maintenance Agreement No. 1879 -R between North St. Paul and the State and Signal Maintenance Agreement No. 1880 -R between Oakdale and the State. Both agreements cover operation, revision, maintenance and removal of EVP Systems by State forces, at a cost shared equally by North St. Paul and Oakdale. 31. Upon proper execution by Maplewood, Oakdale and the State, the EVP Systems for the new or permanent traffic control signals on Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) at County State Aid Highway No. 34 (East Minnehaha Avenue) - County Road No. 70 (10th Street North) and at Harvester Avenue - 15th Street North, and on Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century 64515 -25- Avenue /Geneva Avenue) - Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue /Geneva Avenue) /Trunk Highway No. 5 at Trunk Highway No. 5 (South Junction) [Stillwater Road] - County State Aid Highway No. 6 (Stillwater Boulevard North) shall become a part of Signal Maintenance Agreement No. 1629 -R between Maplewood and the State and Signal Maintenance Agreement No. 1880 -R between Oakdale and the State. Both agreements cover operation, revision, maintenance and removal of EVP Systems by State forces, at a cost shared equally by Maplewood and Oakdale. 32. Any and all persons engaged in the aforesaid work to be performed by the State shall not be considered employees of Ramsey County, Washington County, Maplewood, Oakdale, Woodbury, or North St. Paul and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act of this State on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made by any eighth party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work contemplated herein shall not be the obligation and responsibility of Ramsey County, Washington County, Maplewood, Oakdale, Woodbury, or North St. Paul. The State shall not be responsible under the Worker's Compensation Act for any employees of Ramsey County, Washington County, Maplewood, Oakdale, Woodbury, or North St. Paul. 64515 -26- u 33. Timing of the new or permanent traffic control signals provided for herein shall be determined by the State, through its Commissioner of Transportation, and no changes shall be made therein except with the approval of the State. 34. Upon execution by Ramsey County, Washington County, Maplewood, Oakdale, Woodbury, North St. Paul, and the State and completion of the construction work provided for herein, this agreement shall supersede and terminate Agreement No. 60363 dated June 30, 1981, between Ramsey County, Washington County and the State, and Agreement No. 60364 dated June 23, 1981, between Maplewood and the State. 64515 -27- L' RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit: The removal of one (1) existing hazard identification beacon and three (3) existing temporary traffic control signals, and installation of nine (9) new or permanent traffic control signals with street lights, emergency vehicle pre- emption and signing at various locations on Trunk Highway No. 120 in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and contained in Agreement No. 64515, a copy of which was before the Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers be and hereby are authorized to execute such agreement, and thereby assume for and on behalf of the City all of the contractual obligations contained therein. CERTIFICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the Council of the City of Maplewood at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the day of , 1988, as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession. City Clerk (Seal) P R O C L A M A T I O N WHEREAS, the Hill Murray High School Hockey Team represented Section Three in the Minnesota State Hockey Tournament; and WHEREAS, Hill Murray High School is located in the City of Maple— wood; and WHEREAS, the hockey players gave fully of their time, talent and energy to lead their team to the finals of the Minnesota State Hockey Tournament; and WHEREAS, the Hill Murray High School Hockey Team received the Second Place Trophy for their endeavors, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL and all of the citizens of Maplewood, that the Hill— Murray High School Hockey Team be congratulated and commended for their outstanding achievement of Second Place in the Minnesota State Hockey Tournament. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1830 EAST CO. ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109 March 14, 1988 Mr. Roger Parkinson, Chairman Committee for the Twin Cities Olympic Bid Star Tribune Newspaper of the Twin Cities 425 Portland Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55488 Dear Mr. Parkinson: As Mayor of the City of Maplewood, I am writing to express the enthusiastic support of our community for the efforts of you and your committee to bring the Games of the XXVIth Olympiad to our area. We agree wholeheartedly that the Twin Cities, with our facilities and housing capacity, climate, corporate strength and communitywide support for amateur athletics, as well as our experience in hosting major events are positive factors which should be considered in the selection process and would indicate we could successfully host the Summer Olympics. I am enclosing a Resolution passed by the Maplewood City Council at our March 14 meeting showing our support of your efforts. I assure you that the citizens of Maplewood will do all that we can to demonstrate our hospitality to all the athletes, coaches, staff and visitors at the 1996 Olympics. We look forward to working with you as you continue this bid effort. Sincerely, John C. Greavu Mayor JCG:1nb enclosure CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1830 EAST CO. ROAD B DiAPLENVOOD, MINNESOTA 65109 Resolution No. 4) /I� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD SUPPORTING THE CONCEPT OF MINNEAPOLIS -SAINT PAUL HOSTING THE 1996 SUMMER OLYMPICS. WHEREAS, the Secretary General of the United States Olympic Committee has initiated an inquiry to determine whether the cities of Minneapolis -Saint Paul are interested in hosting the 1996 Summer Olympics; and WHEREAS, the Mayors of Minneapolis -Saint Paul have asked area municipalities for their general support to the concept of hosting the 1996 Summer Olympic Games; and WHEREAS, the Minneapolis -Saint Paul Metro Area enjoys a temperate summer climate well suited to international athletic competitions and now possesses numerous excellent athletic facilities suitable as Olympic venues; and WHEREAS, the Minneapolis -Saint Paul Metro Area has the capacity to provide the necessary accommodations to support visiting athletes and spectators; and WHEREAS, the 1996 Summer Olympic Games would bring significant revenues to the Minneapolis -Saint Paul Metro Area as well as extensive international recognition, without expending taxpayer funds; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood, State of Minnesota, hereby express to the Mayors of Minneapolis and Saint Paul its firm support for the concept of hosting the Summer Olympic Games in 1996. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood at a regular meeting held on March 14, 1988 by the following vote: ayes: nays: John C. Greavu, Mayor