HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988 11-28 City Council PacketAGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, November 28, 1988
Municipal Administration Building
Meeting 88 - 28
(A) CALL TO ORDER
(B) ROLL CALL
(C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Meeting No. 88 -21 (September 26, 1988)
(D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA
(E) CONSENT AGENDA
1. Approval of Claims
2. Ordinance to Increase Hydrant Charge Rates (2nd Reading)
3. Budget Transfer - General Government
4. Budget Transfer - Publishing
5. Hire Park Planner For Vista Hills Park
6. Authorization To Hire a Part -Time Clerk- Typist
7. Change Order No. 1 - Ferndale Storm Sewer, Project 87 -20
8. Final Acceptance - Brooks Court Water, Project 87 -41
9. Final Acceptance - Maplewood Knoll, Project 87 -16
10. Change of Manager - Esteban's Restaurant
11. Bids For Used City Vehicles
(F) PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M., Walter Street - Project 84 -14 (4 Votes)
2. 7:10 P.M., Code Amendment: Planning Fees
3. 7:20 P.M., Holloway Avenue - Project 87 -14 (4 Votes)
4. 7:40 P.M., Cypress Street: Knollwood Circle (Goff Homes, Inc.)
a. Preliminary Plat
b. Rezoning
5. 7:50 P.M., Southlawn Drive and Radatz Avenue: Brandt
a. Kezoning
b. Plan Amendment and
c. Lot Division
G. AWARD OF BIDS
(H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Conditional Use Permit: Larpenteur Avenue and Sylvan Street (St. Paul Water
Utility)
2 PUD Revision: Larpenteur Avenue and McKnight Road (Hillside Center)
3. Televising Council
('I) NEW BUSINESS
1. Approve Plans - Cervais Avenue - Project 88 -14
2. Inspection Request
3. Funding of Combined Sewer Separation
4. City Hall Architects_
�J) VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
(K) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
(L) ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
(M) ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, September 26, 1988
Municipal Administration Building
Meeting No. 88 -21
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council
Chambers, Municipal Building, and was celled to order at 7:00 P.M., by Mayor Greavu.
B. ROLL CALL
j
John C. Greavu, Mayor Present -
i Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present
Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present
Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present
George F. Roasbach, Councilmember Present -
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of Meeting No. 88 -15 (July 11, 1988)
Councilmember Anderson moved that the Minutes of Meeting No 88 -15 (July 11 1988)
be approved as submitted.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
2. Minutes of Meeting No. 88 -16 (July 25, 1988)
i
Mayor Qreavu moved that the Minutes of Meeting No 88 -16 (July 25, 1988)
be approved as corrected.
Page 15, Item H -21 Delete "bids ", insert "best proposal."
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
3. Minutes of Meeting No. - 88 -20 (September 12, 1988)
Councilmember Anderson moved that the Minutes of Meeting No 88 -20 (September 12
1988) be approved as submitted.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers
Anderson, Bastian, and Rossbach
Councilmember Juker abstained.
D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended:
1. Deck Setback
2. National Conference of Cities
3. Meeting with Planning Commission and Park and Recreation Commission before
Consultant Hired
4. Group Home
5. Newspaper Advertising
9/26
6. Flags
7. Walter Street
8. Add I -3, Property Tax Reform
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson
E. CONSENT AGENDA
Council removed Item E -4 to become Item I -4.
Mayor Greavu
1. Approval of Claims
Approved the claims as follows:
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:
$ 713,516.68
Ayes - all.
Checks #8134 - $8182
Dated 09 -01 -88 thru 09 -12 -88
$ 66,197.57
$ 779,714.25
Checks #4047 - #4171
Dated 09 -26 -88
Total per attached voucher /check register
PAYROLL:
$ 155,684.07
155,827.58
$ 30,018.55
29,919.21
$ 371,449.41
$1,151,163.66
Payroll Checks Period Ending 08 -26 -88
Payroll Checks Period Ending 09 -09 -88
Payroll Deductions Period ending 08 -26 -88
Payroll Deductions Period ending 09 -09 -88
Total Payroll
GRAND TOTAL
2. Time Extension: Miggler Addition
Approval of a one -year time extension for the eight -lot Miggler Addition
preliminary plat, subject to the September 14, 1987, conditions of approval,
amended as follows:
1. Submittal of a 66- foot -wide right -of -way easement to the City Engineer
for the extension of proposed Miggler.Drive to Gervais Avenue. The
applicant shall pay all costs for acquiring this easement, including
any costs for acquisition by condemnation. This easement shall not
encroach upon the City's property abutting to the east.
2. Submittal of a signed developer's agreement with required surety for
required public improvements, including the construction of the street,
sanitary sewer and water main extensions to Gervais Avenue and to guar-
antee removal of the truck farm structures that are in conflict with any
setback requirements.
- 2 - 9/26
The City shall pay the cost - differential between a local sanitary sewer
and the eighteen -inch diameter interceptor line that is planned to be
routed along proposed Miggler Drive. The applicant's surety shall not
include this cost - differential.
3. The water main to be constructed in proposed Miggler Drive shall be
looped to the water main in Gervais Avenue.
4. Delete Lot Two, Block and renumber Lots Three through Five to Lots
Two through Four. Lot One, Block Two shall be enlarged to include the
west 185± feet of the former Lot Two. The former Lot Three shall be
enlarged to include the easterly 115± feet of the former Lot Two.
5. Phasing of the plat may be permitted provided:
a. Development is limited to Lots One, Two and Three of Blocks One and
Lots One and Two of Block Two (as revised in condition four) until street
and water main are extended to Gervais Avenue. The area not being developed
in the first phase shall be shown as an outlot.
b. A developer's agreement shall be submitted with the required surety
for all public improvements needed to serve the first phase and to guar-
antee the removal of any truck farm structures in violation of setback
requirements. This agreement shall include the submission of a temporary
108 -foot diameter cul -de -sac easement to the City and construction of a
100 -foot diameter temporary cul -de -sac. The bulb of the cul -de -sac shall
be constructed to the east line of Lot Two, (as revised in condition four),
Block Two.
c. Fire flows in proposed Miggler Drive must meet the fire code.
6. Miggler Drive shall be a 66- foot -wide right -of -way.
7. City Engineer approval of final grading, drainage and utility plans.
These plans must include an eighteen -inch sanitary sewer line within
proposed Miggler Drive. This sewer shall be deep enough to accommo-
date the remainder of this interceptor line to be constructed from
Barclay Street and Highway 36.
8. The east /west portion of Miggler Drive shall be renamed "Brooks
Avenue ".
9. The north /south portion of "Miggler Drive" shall be renamed "Chambers
Street ".
3. Conditional Use Permit Renewal: Harmony School
Approved the renewal of the conditional use permit for five years for a
community education and day -care facility at 2650 White Bear Avenue, subject
to the original conditions of approval.
4. Home Occupation Renewal: 1161 Lealand Road
Discussed as Item I -4.
- 3 - 9/26
5. Renewal of Insurance Contracts
Approved that the existing one -year contracts for employee insurance be
renewed with Blue Cross /Blue Shield, Group Health, Share, Employee Benefit
P1an,.Schools Insurance Fund, and Commercial Life.
6. Budget Transfer: Planning Consultant
Approved the transfer of.$9,000 from the contingency account to the
Community Development Department budget for a planning consultant to
edit, reduce the size and evaluate the need for further changes in the
City's Comprehensive Plan.
7. Request for No Parking Signs - Larpenteur Avenue
Resolution No.. 88 - 9 - 152
WHEREAS, the north side of Larpenteur Avenue from Century to McKnight
is striped for bikes and pedestrians;
WHEREAS, significant parking occurs in this area causing safety concerns
identified by the Maplewood Police Department.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, CITY COUNCIL
that Ramsey County is requested to establish a "No Parking" zone on the
north side of Larpenteur Avenue from Century to McKnight.
8. Price and Ruth - Stop Sign
Approved the placement of stop signs on both sides of Price and Ruth.
9. Accept Resignation of John Prey - H.R.C. and H.R.A.
Accepted the resignation of John Prey from the Human Relations Commission and
Housing and Redevelopment Authority and thank Mr. Prey for services.
10. Authorization to Fill Part Time Position
Authorized to fill the permanent part -time position for the City Clerk and
Deputy Registrar Department.
11. Resolution - Uniform Policy - Cable Companies
Resolution No. 88 - 9 - 153
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood,.in conjunction with others comprising
the Ramsey- Washington Counties Suburban Cable Commission ( "RWCSCC "), has been
requested by the Grantee of their similar Cable Communications System Fran-
chises ( "Franchise "), to evaluate issues relating to the potential transfer
of the access operations; and
WHEREAS, it is the concern of this City Council that in this process
all cable company personnel or representatives (including its parent or af-
filiates) conduct any communications with regard to this matter with the City
Council as a whole and not with individual members of the City Council or ad-
ministration; and
- 4 - 9 /26
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest
of all of those participating in the transfer process that all communications
be public to avoid any sort of misunderstanding and unwarranted accusations
that would otherwise develop either against the City or any of its Council-
members or representatives; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined a policy must be adopted that
will be consistently followed by its Councilmembers and staff and with the
understanding that Councilmembers of other communities will likewise adhere
to a similar policy.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota;
1. It is the policy of the Mayor and City that all communica-
tions regarding any matter of the cable communications system
proposed transfer of access operations shall be directed to the
a City Council as a whole and not to an individual Council or staff
member. It is not intended by this that communications by a
constituent acting in a private capacity as a constituent will
be prohibited.
2. It is requested that the Chairperson of the RWCSCC will request
from the Grantee of the Franchise that they provide a list desig-
nating each person who will be the official speakers or representa-
tives,on behalf of them, and further, that the RWCSCC shall provide
to the City Council from time to time, a report advising it of the
names of any such official speakers or representatives.
3. That a copy of this resolution be forwarded by the City Clerk to
the Chairperson of the RWCSCC and to the Clerk of each of the
cities who may be forming the same cable communications system.
4. The RWCSCC is hereby authorized to distribute a copy of this
Resolution to the cable company as part of the access transfer
process.
5. This Resolution will be effective beginning with the day of its
passage and continue until an ordinance granting a transfer of the
access operations to the RWCSCC is adopted.
F. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M., Conditional Use Permit Revision (Mn. D.O.T. Research Building)
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the
request of Minnesota Department of Transportation to delete a condition that
states "A building permit shall not be issued until the City has signed a
contract for the construction of Gervais Avenue."
b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the
proposal.
- 5 - 9/26
d. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against
the proposal., The following were heard:
Melville O'Reilly, 2411 Kennard
James Glander, 1572 Gervais
e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
f. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
88 -9 -154
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation initiated a con-
ditional use permit to construct a laboratory and research center on the
following- described properties in Section 10, T. 29, R. 22;
1. Subject to street the W 365 ft. of the E 39 acres of N 1/2 of SW 1/4
lying N of Sth 36 -118; and
2. Ex Northern Pacific RY R/W & Ex E 39 acres; part of N 1/2 of SW 1/4
lying N of N L of Hwy 36 & lying Ely of a L run NEly from intersection
of E L or W 19 acres & N L of Sd Hwy 36 to a point 260 feet S of N L
of Sd SW 1/4 & 140 ft. E of E L of Sd W 19 acres Th E Par with N L of
Sd SW 1/4 to W1y L of Sd N P Ry RA9 Th NEly to N L of Sd SW 1/4.•
The revision would change Condition Two to read:
2. A building permit shall not be issued until the City has ordered .
the construction of Gervais Avenue.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as
:f.ollows:
1. This revision to the conditional use permit was reviewed by the
Maplewood Planning Commission on September 19, 1988. The Planning
Commission recommended to the City Council that said permit be
approved.
2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on September 26,
1988. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All
persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be
heard and present written statements. The Council also considered
reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the
above - described conditional use permit revision be approved on the basis of
the following findings -of -fact:
1. The use is in conformity with the City's comprehensive plan and
with the purpose and standards of this chapter.
2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detri-
mental to the public health, safety or general welfare.
- 6 - 9/26
3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to
be compatible with the character of that zoning district.
4. The use would not depreciate property values.
5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to
present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises,
glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off,
vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or
other nuisances.
6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local
streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access
or, parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area prop-
erties.
7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as
streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks.
8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at
public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be
detrimental to the welfare of the City.
9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and
scenic features into the development design.
10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
L. Adherence to the site plan, date - stamped 1988, unless a change
is approved by the City's Community Design Review Board.
2. A building permit shall not be issued until the City has ordered
the construction of Gervais Avenue.
3. There shall be no odors or noises from this site that are
detectable at the east property line other than those normally
associated with the ingress and egress of trucks and cars.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
2. 7:10 P.M., Gervais Avenue
a. Sewer Plan Amendment (4 Votes)
b. Public Improvement Project (4 Votes)
c. No Parking Designation
1. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for the public hearing regarding
an amendment to the sewer plan, the improvement of Gervais Avenue, and
for.no parking on Gervais between Barclay and Kennard Streets.
2. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
- 7 - 9/26
3. Assistant City Engineer Irish presented-the specifics of the
proposal.
4. "'Larry Bohr, Consultant from Toltz, King, Duval and Anderson,
presented the specifics of the proposal.
5. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or
against the proposal. The following voiced their opinions:
Jim Glander, 1572 Gervais
Jeff Cosolis, 2408 Barclay
LeRay Tuil, 2352 Barclay
Resident at 1571 Gervais
6. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
7. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
88 -9 -155
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the sewer
element of the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan to reroute a planned future
trunk line, northwest from Barclay Street and Highway 36 through the
Miggler property (north of Gervais Avenue and west of Gerten Pond) to
Highway 61 rather than due west along Highway 36 to Highway 61.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as
follows:
1. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on
September 19, 1988, to consider this plan amendment. Notice
thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons
present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard
and present written statements. The Planning Commission recom-
mended to the City Council that said plan amendment be approved.
2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on
September 26, 1988. The Council considered reports and recommen-
dations from the Planning Commission and City Staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the
above - described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following
findings of fact:
1. The Highway 36 alignment would be more costly because it would
be constructed in the frontage road. The Miggler alignment
would be built with a new street and the costs shared with the
Miggler development.
2. There is already a sewer in the frontage road to serve adjacent
properties. Putting the sewer through the Miggler site would
serve abutting properties as well as relieve the lift station.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
- 8 - 9/26
b. Public Improvement Project
1. Mayor-Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or
against the proposal. The following expressed their opinions:
Jeff Cosolis, 2408 Barclay
Resident at 1579 Gervais
Melville O'Reilly, 2411 Kennard
Lorraine Reimers,'1555 Gervais
Mark Terry, 1478 Gervais
Joseph Waters, 2393 Hazelwood
2. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
3. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
88 -9 -156
WHEREAS, after due notice of public hearing on the construction
of roadway with concrete curb and gutter and associated improvements
on Gervais Avenue, English Street to approximately 1200 feet east,
City Project 88 -14, a hearing on said improvement in accordance with
the notice duly given was duly held on September 26, 1988, and the
Council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and
has fully considered the same;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA, as follows:
1. That it is advisable, expedient and necessary that the City
of Maplewood construct roadway with concrete curb and gutter
and associated improvements on Gervais Avenue, English Street
to approximately 1200 feet east, City Project 88 -14, as de-
scribed in the notice of hearing thereof, and orders the same
to be made.
2. The City Engineer is designated engineer for this improvement
and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifica-
tions for the making of said improvement.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
c. No Parking Designation
1. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or
against the proposal. The following voiced their opinions:
Resident at 1486 Gervais
2. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing
3. Councilmember Juker moved that Staff investigate the question of
legality of parking signs on Gervais.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
- 9 - 9/26
3. 7:20 P.M., 2829 -47 White Bear Avenue
a. Plan Amendment (4 Votes)
b. Rezoning (4 Votes)
1. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding
approval of a plan amendment from LSC, limited service commercial to
SC, Service Commercial, and approval of a rezoning from LBC limited
business commercial and BC (M) business commercial modified to BC,
business commercial.
2. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
3. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of
the proposal.
4. Gene Peterson, the developer, spoke on behalf of the proposal.
5. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or
against the proposal. No one was heard.
6. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
7. Councilmember Anderson introduced the followins.resolution and
moved its adoption:
88 -9 -157
WHEREAS, GP -BAJR, Inc., initiated an amendment to the Maplewood
Comprehensive Plan from LSC to SC for the following- described properties:
1. Ex W 1685 ft the S 100 ft of N 405 ft of part of SW 1/4
W of White Bear Avenue.
2. 'Ex W 1685 ft the S 100 ft of N 505 ft of part of SW 1/4
W of White Bear Avenue
3. Ex N 505 ft and ex W 1685 ft part of SW 1/4 N of Radatz
Ave and W of White Bear Ave.
All in Section 2, Township 29, Range 22
These properties are more commonly described as 2829 -47 White Bear
Avenue.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows:
1. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on
August 1, 1988, to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof
was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present
at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present
written statements. The Planning Commission recommended to the
City Council that said plan amendment be approved.
- 10 - 9/26
2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment
on September 26, 1988. The Council considered reports and
recommendations from the Planning Commission and City Staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that
the above - described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the
following findings of fact:
1. White Bear Avenue is a heavily traveled street, which is
conducive to service commercial uses.
2. The.property to the north is designated SC.
3. The Radatz Avenue neighborhood would be buffered by the LBC
zone to the west of the site.
. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all.
8., Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
88 -9 -158
WHEREAS, GP -BAJR, Inc., initiated a rezoning from LBC and BC(M) to BC
for the following described property:
1. Ex W 1685 ft the S 100 ft of N 405 ft of part of SW 1/4 W
of White Bear Avenue
J ,.2. Ex W 1685 ft the S 100 ft of N 505 ft of part of SW 1/4 W
of White Bear Avenue
3. Ex N 505 ft and ex W 1685 ft part of SW 1/4 N of Radatz
Ave. and W of White Bear Avenue
All in Section 2, Township 29, Range 22
These properties are more commonly described as 2829 -47 White Bear
Avenue.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission
on August 1 and September 19, 1988. The Planning Commission recom-
mended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved.
2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on September 26,
1988, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published
and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing
were given an opportunity to be heard and present written state-
ments. The Council also considered reports and recommendations
of the City Staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that
the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following
findings of fact:
- 11 - 9/26
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose
and intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract
from the use of neighboring property or from the character of
the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to
the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately
safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and con-
veniences of the community, where applicable, and the public
welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the
logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services
and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire
protection and schools.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all.
9. Councilmember Rossbach requested staff to contact Ramsey County to
request a traffic study for signalization at Radatz and White Bear
Avenue.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
10. Councilmember Juker moved that Staff investigate rezoning the sout
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
4. 7:30 P.M., Conditional Use Permit Termination (Sbarro's Game Room)
a. Mayor Greavu moved to convene the meeting for a public hearing to ter-
minate the conditional use permit for a game room at Sbarro, the Italian
Eatery Restaurant at the Maplewood Mall as requested by the owners.
b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
c. .Mayor Greavu
,Teri
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
5. 7:40 P.M., Driveway Variance - 1377 Belmont
a. Mayor Greavu
b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
c. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the proposal.
- 12 - 9/26
d. Mr. James Welter, 1377 Belmont Lane, the applicant, spoke on behalf of
the proposal.
e. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against
the proposal. The following were heard:
Stanley Baligrodzki, 1369 E. Belmont Lane
Resident at 1383 E. Belmont Lane
Shirley Baligrodzki, 1369 E. Belmont Lane
f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
g. Councilmember Juker moved to den the variance a
based on the Staff report and because Mr Welter cre
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
G. AWARD OF BIDS
1. Southlawn Avenue Project 85 -17
a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption•
88 -9 -159
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the
bid of Danner, Inc., in the amount of $442,947.02 is the lowest responsible
bid for the construction of Southlawn Avenue, Beam Avenue to County Road D,
City Project 85 -17, and the proper City officials are hereby authorized and
directed to enter into a contract, after final MSA plan approval and com-
pletion of right -of- way /easement acquisition, with said bidder for and on
behalf of the City.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Goff's Maplewood Third Addition
a. Variation
b. Final Plat
1. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
2. Bruce Hilger, representing Goff's Homes,.spoke on behalf of the
proposal.
3. Councilmember Rossbach moved to deny the variation from the Platting
Code.
Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - Councilmembers Bastian, Juker and
Rossbach
- 13 - 9/26
Nays - Mayor Greavu, Councilmember
Anderson.
4. Councilmember Juker moved to approve the final plat of Goff's
Mapleview Third Addition.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
5. Councilmember Juker reauested Staff review t
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all.
I. NEW BUSINESS
1. Regional Railroad Authority - Appointment to N.E. Corridor Task Force.
a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
b. Councilmember Anderson
and Mavor John Greavu to t
Seconded by Councilmember Juker
Ayes - Councilmember Juker
Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson,
Bastian and Rossbach abstained.
H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (Continued)
2. Code Amendment: Setback to Residential Districts (4 Votes)
a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
b. Councilmember Rossbach moved to refer the proposed_ ordinance back to the
Staff for further investigation.
Seconded by Councilmember Juker.
I. NEW BUSINESS (Continued)
Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers
Juker and Rossbach
Nays - Councilmembers Anderson and
Bastian.
1. Regional Railroad Authority - Appointment to N.E. Corridor Task Force
a. Councilmember Bastian moved to waive the Rules of Procedures to reconsider
the previous vote.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson
b. Councilmember Bastian
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson
Ayes - all.
Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian
and Juker
Mayor Greavu and Councilmember Rossbach
2. T.H. 61 Frontage Road, North of County Road C (Petition)
a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
b. Councilmember Rossbach moved to refer the petition b
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all.
3. Property Tax Reform
a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
b. Mayor Greavu moved authorization up to $2000.00
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
4. Home Occupation Renewal - 1161 Leland Road
a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
b. Councilmember Juker moved renewal of the conditi
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all.
J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
None.
K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Deck Setback
a. Councilmember Bastian moved to refer to Staff wt
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
2. National Conference of Cities
a. Councilmember Bastian requested authorization to attend the National
Conference of Cities.
b. Councilmember Anderson moved to approve Councilmember Bastian attending
the National Conference of Cities. ,
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
3. Meetings
a. Councilmember Anderson
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all.
tant.
- 15 - 9/26
4. Group Homes
a. Councilmember Anderson stated he read in the St. Paul papers that most
group homes be moved to the suburbs.
b. Councilmember Anderson moved to investigate the possibility of the Council
havine authoritv to annrove the oronn hnmea_
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes — Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers
Anderson, Juker and Rossbach
Councilmember Bastian abstained.
5. Newspaper Advertising
a. Councilmember Rossbach referred the question of what type of advertising
can be in a city newspaper to the legal staff.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes — all.
6. Flags
a. Councilmember Rossbach stated the flags in the Council Chamber should be
displayed more prominently.
7. Walter Street
a. Councilmember Juker questioned the status of Walter Street being con-
structed to Frost Avenue. "
b. Staff stated a feasibility study is being prepared.
8. Crestview Drive
a. Mayor Greavu requested Staff to notify the person who is building a house
at the end of Crestview Drive that he has to be 50 feet from the creek.
L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
None.
M. ADJOURNMENT
9:25 P.M.
City Clerk
- 16 - 9/26
1
Agenda Number E -1
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director A�k
RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
DATE: November 16, 1988
Action by Council:
End o r s e d____--.-_
Modif. i od._..,.
Rejecte
Date ----
It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following
claims:
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:
$ 385,386.15
$ 151,213.00
$ 536,599.16
PAYROLL:
$ 155,786.75
$ 30,600.61
$ 186,387.36
$ 722,986.52
Checks #8388 #8440
Dated 11 -01 -88 thru 11 -14 -88
Checks #4596 - #4732
Dated 11 -28 -88
Total per attached voucher /check register
Payroll Checks
Payroll Deductions
Total Payroll
GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims.
DFF:kaz
I f 0 0 • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • v v w 7 z �.;
lti
O
0 a
. . . . . . . - - - 2a v On a n A it R n R A 9 A A 9 A 2 A A a 70 AA 9 A232 A62R A62 A nAA
9 A A
0
0
kO 4
co
u
-xi
o
0
1
-Xi c
C9
L,
a
ci
IIJ 0
M
N c
0 0
c
0
0 P
W,
N
In 0)
0)
0
11 0
Z,
0
n
-Y,
1-
z
oil
v
N
D f11
0
-Y)
0
in
I LO
w U
w
t-i
b
--J
.
LQ
0
m
>
Ij
13
.l In
w
Ij
Al
tt
J
0.1
i7l
in
w
x r
7
X z
L-j A A
•o
Zi
LU
iM
Cl
iM
_J
I
W
Cif
W
a
In
UT
IA
03 U
ul
j
LO
D
4
j
iZ
I
-al
1-
<
co
LO
1
0
iX
in
ol 0
0
co
w IX
w
-N
m
<0
ly
1 9
iJ7
if
01
0
- -
-- - -
- - -
- - -
- -
L S .
. . 2
J
ty)
j
J
]r
f]
O
W
x
—
—
—
—
XRXRS:`d:a:
W +X 9x:.
R.":A
RR:xR
R.
RAasa
RS
::caxeX
enR
XX.^.AGR:t
OI
O :
O
CN
M �1'
W -^�'OU
Ou}
O �
O
JO•:
:-•)
O
p
p
,a
O
v _
�
M
•o .. ,
r a
r .z.
..•
•,J ..�
�.
. �
To ll
:v .1 :
;.l :t
m
o
u;
�
1
N
Ul
:1
'-
-
0
n
�
] Y)
J ,p
W V '
J w
) r:
U) 03 •f
Y.� �)
UJ
a
0
.,
..• ..
,. •
s 11 _
HJ
-
_
-
-
r
,�
7
.,
-
-
L
Y
Ul
..
F
"•]
F-
.r
O
-
H
w :+
•
O LL
1 4
4 4
1.
C
rJ!
V
P
cn
tn
W
W
1.
�U
E
•:o
u+
e 'v
W
W
'r
'W
ca
\
co
D
P
W
O
O
O
O
O
O
41
O�
:tl
O
7
' W
O
O
•T
O
µ
O
J
N
�
•'
:�
N
ti
O
O
O
`
O
Z
VJ
N
v
'9
P
T
O
N
M
ICJ
�
t-
•T
O
N
[G
"U W
�
t
O
O
O
^
�
y
Y
`f
V
�•
�
D
>
Z
A A
R :• R
R A A
X R R
S
i
R
9 2 R
:. R R
A R R S:
„ p R
A R S
C
W
U+
i
w
uJ
O -
3 tO
:l
4" Y
F
J
U T.
�y a
2 •1
U
O
9 �
•
V
N
MI
Z
•L�
M
�
m
O
�
W
r.
N
N
M
NN
47M
50 If
NM
M
m f
NN
`0 `0
o n J
rP
=t O
n
-+ 0
NN
a
IIy
r I[)
P P
P P
r
O+
`^ r
P Ji
•C� fi; t)
N O
:'J M
m •O
r
IS)
1[) ,
P
m
Z
.-� .+
LL• I[1
ICS
O
N
N Ci
m
r
N r
IL)
an d
O M
'L a
ni .+
Ity iJ
-
LV O
v m
M
P
M
CO
O P
•�
E
Q '.
4)
M
q.
p
m
Cy
M
W
iJ
Z
W
Z F
h-
W
U '
JI iJ)
Cfl J) U
J: G
G
t,) G) G
10
Ul V] J
:.J :,] V
U) U)
'
�--
4.1 W I
lV LU
L�J W L
W � W,
w
W
, U L
10
V1 W I!
ul ;l1 '
J W !
..: UJ b
u
L
o-
I W
LJ
CC
W
O
F
F- F-
r 1-
~- F- '
h `
1-
i" �_
s ' F' •
.v F
-
1
F 4-
t- 1-
LC
_
C?
lu
W iJ
`-, 4
F 1- F
F F- F
�~ •-•
s- F�
F
q s
I- r
W F F
W
N
u-u
7:J.
J�
»
»
J
7
:x>
> CJ
� Ct
JCy _
J J
� ❑
7J
+_
�
z
r,
�.
F
O
U L
L
J
O
Z
'r
K
it
Z
W
�
O
W
q
U
Y
V
rJ
UJ
R
K
£
W
£
3 _
fL
J
n)
z
m
s c
a
m
m
m
J)
m
00
m
m
m
p.
P
O
OOi
G
ti
l y
O
O
O
O
O
iil
ifi
Iti
N
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
M
z
r
In
r
w
`p
\
N
J
IL)
r
46
u
m
m
m
m
0
m
z
F
n
�
>
Z
•
w w v v w w w w w w w
U.
k�
ui
0
iO
0
tM
0
M
u
co
0
IV
0
1p
C
N
lcl
Z
0
0 c
Q
d Z
N
0,
ID
93
1
N
0)
0
-D
w
Ld
IA
to
0
A
A
o
LO
A x
14
>
4 I<
<
W ,
Ld
a
L.)
r
I
1, 0 c
Z r
O
to
H
flo
<
lu
(L IC
Z
a
to
<
to
<
c
0
W
L
Ix I
U
¢
d
to
z
ID
x
.01 1
<
It
< f.
W
LU
<
¢
u
N
Ul
Y
W
W
ct
Lo
j
<
4
0
u
L
CO
2
z
z
Ix
10 C,
11)
0
<
rz
In
C,
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
r
0
CO
1n
f u,
It
Ul
N
tt,
41
0
u 0
0
In
ID
It
It
It
Ir
Y)
x
IJ
C_
o)
W
} 'Y
- 'Jl
U U
a
c )
fY-
O
A • • • • 0
6
0
0
Ln
C.
O
d
0
O
1
N
F
tl
C1
RI
G
N
M
V'
'•D
m N.
N
O
O
n n
O
oc
O Lc
O
O
LLi
I•-
O c
r
CR
.� V
W,
N
?
V
.R
M O L
d
<p
m N
m 1 1
N
tT
N
[J P
£
N
¢
tv
s
U
Y
O
rD
U
z
K
00
I
H) co
UJ u
rl
£
'
F
LL
N
rfJ R
m tJ
In
Ul 4
U
F -
f
LL
W
LLI I,
r, i
U_
y
Ls
h
t- F- f
i- U
w
x
�•
¢ <
�-•
U
CL
_1
Y
U
r
.JJ
W
¢
L.
CR
ii V
4 P
tD i
J
Z
On
.:
V
¢
>
7.
G
N
F.1
W
.. L
2_
J •_
?`
J
ill
W
W
fc LI
x
W
ww
w
u
0
,
x
m
yl
Z
i
LR
¢
LLI
LO
n
W
£
y
U
VJ
P
J
is
J
x
T
_
J
x
-
U
m
(P
pl
x
-
C
rp
Z
LL
rrA
-
C
W
O
Z
5
¢
lJ
1.0
3¢
LA
m
a
m
u
w
r�
��
•�
¢
¢
<
¢
m
y
rA
Vi
V)
m
P m
m
m
PJ
P
CR
m
m
rA
m
u S
m ,
_ n)
rn
_
•JJ
P m
\
\
1
\
\
rA
S.
\
Pi
�.
fP
C
ti.
0 1'•
Q�
P]
W
m.
P ^V
i
c•.
'`d
C'
O
�\J
N
C\1
N
O N
L
.
•:d
p
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
LO
O
• n i
O
!Y
y
•'
U
10
O
o
u'.
O
n
P
IO
R
j
m
_
r N
V
O
£
tV
O
O
•
O
O
R R
O
p.
•T O
O
C 'NJ
N
_J
;]
It
I[1
LL)
`O
m
O
O
N
I
Z
0
O
O
O
O
O
1 LO
x
J
O
W
,R
•O
.P
d
V
d•
a
a
�
.T
a
t
e�
v
v
v
v
v
7
£
y
Z
- 7
5
A R R
-
tl 5
5
9 R
Z N •'L
F' N n
A • • • • 0
6
7
Y
W
J f'
V rl
3 r?
I
S L
� H
J U
7
S.
C
n
p rL
L
u
- - ARAARPAARARRAAAPRR B ^ TTASRSB ' aYSTOSS SSRAR
°n RR
K
O
O
O
•6
Cy
O
O
0
ry
O
7
Cl
N
N
O
G
ul r
O
c
E
.J 11
N
b
N
V
a
C
J
.J
>
U
>
¢
T
>
Y
U
V-
Z
-
4
Z
w I!
a
w
z
'
v
Ul
W
Z
Ul U
U)
N
£
Z
£ 4
r^
Q
G
it
J
rA `1
LA
N
'
L C
w
.. y.
L u.
L LL
y
•l C•
!]
n
z
:L
W
UJ
W
w
Z
z
_
u
Z
>_ z
L >_
l
Z Z
LU
-
Z
C:l
K
S
C'
)
K
T
Z
J
I
Y1
Y
H
Z
3
E
N
pl
M
1
N
S
0
p
L
V
H
iL
O
4
Q
U
05
2
fL
V
z
Z
W
w
n
0
J
Z
f
Z
U)
iL
w
o]
a
¢
u
p
a
L
U
F
4
Z
}
Z
¢
N
z
S
Q
Q
p
U
Z
J
':0
':J �)
.p
M
'P.
'>o
S
M
^ N
M
v]
P.
^ •tl
a
N
nl
N
N
lV.
N t
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
O
^
O
O
O
O
O
O
W
n
'r
M
?
C CY
N
a
.
a
N
•.
�
LLl
ICi
F
- Z
ti
N
N
N
t Ol
U P
O
N
M
w
b
OU
P
N
K
n
ti
!L
[L
nl
'V
.`J
N
N
N
W
C?
M
co
M
C]
W
S
W
•a
b
b
•J
b
b
b
U
W
b
b
J
b
U
0
K
V
V
K
V
V
K
K
K
V
K
K
K
D
£
O
�
>
Z
'W8�"tlS7�Y "B9RFNR$R%RAR B:tl$$B $63SR PFRkR - R
W
c,
d
1
W i
Y
F r.'
V
J
iJ
co a
w ti
2
V�
o'
• rte • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 • •
O
O
N
O
O
W
O<
F-
Ul
O
O
F c
M
0 c
Z
0
0
o
m
o .
ro u
p
YP
T
O 1
1L'1
P
nJ:.
r
G
O
O
N
O
O
C)
n)u)
M m.
�0 T
O
•J lfi '
O
n]
v
p O
NNf
0 1
Mn
0N 1
ooq
If)T
W
Nr
P
0.
ivi
F
tn
vp
O
O
r
w
Z
•
•
M n
M , R '
M M
� R
p
�
Vi
C) t
d
O
LLl
P
M
•"+ N
•a l�
4 i•)
I-
p
y
.. ul
v 7
p
F
q
L
u
W❑
W W
WW
x
U
-
:.-.
:.�
...-a
..
-. c :
r C•
i.
W
Z
-.
LJ
�
J
3
3
-
n
Q
z
Z
'r
[n
�
ff)
C�1
LO Cn U
e, n5
A':
£
-
W
:r. G
tt
sE
O
£
O
�t
•� C
£ S
w
m u
U.
Ll :
Ll
W
-J
.J
U: 0
w :L z
K
W
J
>
U
tJ
'v'1 t
U)
W U) U
W U)
rVi
-
co U
i ._ W U
ii LL
W
W 4
iJ
UJ :
W u
WWU
W W 3-
% Z
d L
I W W+
—
w
M.
wu
LU W
w to _
p O
w
_] 7-
Z
0.
LL U
U
L u
U- U.
Ci it
L
i,LL U
D
>
W
}
W
R)
UI
ch
W
L
Z
4
_
iC
Z
L
W
w
W
¢
W U
¢
Y
N
co
.-
3
C
=
: o
F
U)
W.
£
V
w c
CO
'x
0)
0.)
CR
Oi
a
R)
m
CR
n
W
co
a
W
1p
0
o0
m
x.
co
m
w
m
m
0)
m
N
N
N
N
fr
O
O
O
O
10
0•
O
.O
o
O
u)
O
uJ
£
r
N [
O
O
O
O
c
z
m
m
m
m
m
m
n m
IXt
U
O
:L
4l
Ll
l
2
W
v'
V'
b
•R
•0
, R
ro
p
d'
V
>
z
A F A
C R
A A
= 8
c p F
• rte • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 • •
rsA�AaA 9R�CAAAAaA a8:Sa39SaS9R:CAARX
7
UJ
y -J
if
1
S
U a J
w c u
U
� > Z
A A A A A A A a C a A A A a A A S S "a A S S
E•. rAe] r - • en y ^ R� � > !f, ~ (m d'• A -� w. •^.. � nm *R a A '� ° ,R � � � �'.
CJ O
O O
O O
O [ i
in O
O N
N c O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
L O
O
E
C �
�
O O
O •
•P O
O [
[J N O
O
[ :
:n u7 O
O O
O O
4
n t
tV
M
£ M
4 )
)
UJ
a _
_
z I
In r
r•] L
LU
1.- '
'L L
L.
Z a
ail W i
iL
•y F J
J .
.' U W
W U
U F 4
i M
.Q - N
N
_ !
!_- 1
1 tJl •
4¢ .
Ce 3 E
E E E
E E
E •
•�l W
W W
W [
[.+ w
w !
!•1
�Ji i
is 7
7 M
t•�
.13 W
W _
_ �
^
M i
M t
C r p
p H
- J
W :
:Y J
J ^
H -
J W
CL
N
y
a
k
F.
UJ U
U
K
O r
ril 1
1-
U �
� Z
Z
i G• H
K Y
Y J
J i
i -
-� L
L
H K
• S
S U p
Q O
p J
J �
� £
£ :
:- 2
2
W u C
C K
K E
- Q
O J
J W
W 2
2 '
'� •
•- O
O
F_ Z
Z
Z
Q N
N F
F
2 N
N Q
W
m W
W a
a] e
e m �
�U i
i0 .e i
iJ C
CU
<en r
ro \
\a •
m m
m w
w .
m •
•u ,
,n c
co ?
?!
0
]] U
U] N
N •
•lJ e
e m
N :
1 t
t\ N
.a m
N 6
61 •
•`
6 C
C N
N N
N -
-\ N
: 1
bl N
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 o
o i
in o
o c
c o
o
W O
O O
O O
O I
I }�. t
to v
v �
�rv ]
]] P
P m
m
N
Z C
C r
r'J r
r Q �
� b
b �
�
1
P 0
0
w s
s
If
in 4
4] 4
4 In `
`a d
`a `
`o •
•a ;
;o �
� `
`o
x w
w '
'•e `
`o �
�e `
`u `
`a a
d d
d d
d `
a a
a n
n a
a v
v a
a
a 2
2 v
U > £
£
O �
�
E•. rAe] r - • en y ^ R� � > !f, ~ (m d'• A -� w. •^.. � nm *R a A '� ° ,R � � � �'.
W
W
3'
1L
U u
c
CJ
w m
W w
�Y \
= d
U •+
p .•
app #p #p#p Aa NNANRNRRB.tl78:S69Ra NpARRRRRRaNNBG RN$RRp.NN
#p#
0
0
h
O
O
O
N}
O
!V
P.
O
b
•V
p
M
O
m
N
Wo
ti
Q
In
a
c oocooc
O
O
O
-0
N
00
1--
O 0
O
d N t
[J-,
. o
6 O c
O O c
O
O c
O
0 c
0
0.V
00
O
b
P ti
-+ b•
P +V i•
• ?• : V
z
O If
N 1fi
0N) 00if
O
O
!0
O
•+ P
N.
O•
m
b
VJ m
N N
M •G
M
0
-0
K
w
^
ro
a
In
h
W W U
w W
W
W [
Z
N
lJ
UJ
W
LJ
W
Z Z 4
Z Z 2
n
¢ ¢
J
>
>
Z
Z
>
¢
¢ >
¢ ¢
7
-a
r
CL
x
G
..
W
x
w
.+ C
-•
ly W
U U
V rv_. t.
U U
O
<
G¢
< <
Zz
1.0
W
4
w ft
S
W U
W
4
G
U.
r0 COu
W W •,
NN
••
£ £
£ £
CO
W
i0
x
Lu LL
D
w U
'fin
£
£
? [•l
«+
� CO •
^�
p
J
� h
uJ
L,. It U
�
1!. LL
U
�_
.L
p
U
R.
£ £
£
p
O
:J
U: •aJ c
Ap •>
u H
U
K
U
h
U
W
"�
"•
J _
__ _I .<
6¢
Q G
N
Ul
Z u
U
Z Z
z
0
V`
w
VJ
¢
a
N
CL
6¢
a G
UL
W
ft. 1
U_ W
W
W
z
Z
r+
VJ
U
W
W
R W
Ln 10
-
o w
C'1 W'
U
a
w W
W
W iJ r
U
O
iL
"•
< <
4 G
CL r
'W 0
W
W
'U
'�
W
.--. W
I L W
W U
'J W U
W
W W
X X f
:Y IY -
LL
-
U
a
£
£ 'z
D- 4
LL 0
lL
fL
•Y
CtJ
W
P
rV
LO
Z
U
w
U
>
Z
a
W
CQ
w
w
¢
z
p
Z
w
U
Z
CU
c
n
u
u
ti
z
Z
N
J
>
O
J
>
W
W
¢
W >
W
L.
J
p
UJ
h
J
fi
> �
W
UJ
h U
W
V
Ul
U
Z
f
r
UJ
f£
6
U
Z L
p
3
K
z
Z
Z
0
N
CL
>-
O
W u
W
U 2
O
,l L
S
W
J
J u
U
3
bi
Z
Z
CO
G
fL
4
h
h
0
O
h
W
w
W
z
z 2
z
z
a
1-
a u
a
a
a.
p=
rc
iV
m
w
N
W
N
N
N
m
N
m
V:.
m
N
w
w
N
w
w
m
N
IV V
w
w
U1
\
\ N
\
\
•�
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
w
LN
w
m
N
m
w 0
w
N
co 0
[V
'n
¢
N
N
CV
N r,
N
N
N 0
N
LV
N C•
L•1
N
K
P
O c
O
O
O
IC1
O
O
O
O
O
O
W
a•
O
O
O
N
M
O
O
O
O
O
O
'p
O
•-•
P
.V b
N
v
N
M
N
.• C
N
1-
..•
a
v
u�
.o
o
-•
v
v
z
a
�+
•o
•a
r
r
r
ti
r
r
1
r
\
iL
LL]
!V
N
P
N
N
LLl
!V
r
o P
O
x
w
d
ti
�
�
•o
d
�
m
�
.+
v}
��
O `
> c
Z
C
W
C�
iY
VJ
n
p �
3
V =1
J Y
Q '!
r u
} L
O
IV
(9 M
Wm
x 'm
::IAS ^ „BC,RAASAA %A %AAR86868 ^aR "r 66 R;,86AAA6RR8'e :8886868: AR'XXX
V
O
C
N
O
O
d
O
7J
O
O
0
O
O
IC1
d
C
.T
V
F
•0
ICS
ICS
O
N
W
0
O
N
d'
•+
'.V
o
<
n
so
a
1
p
N M
N
F
O
N��
N M
N
V'aJ
.
M
.r N.
•�
O
¢
M
M
0
0
JG)
W
U
WVI
F
itU
WJ'
Vi
p
W W
iV
.:
'J W
]J
u
V. !
lrl f'J
p
w W
'J :'
li V_ '-
t.
Y
Ch
M N
w
" W iu
W
O
'J
W VJ ''
Ul
U
'� C
N
M
2 d;
M
d [
in Ul
2
W
UJ -
d 1
d -
�-
n
o
9
Y
w
W W
dd -
O
W W
to p_
K
01
>
>
9J
W
J
N fJJ
'1
L
6. d
5 U
p
s W
to N c
U)
p O
M
U.
d r!
Ch U] [
])
W
u
a
Z
'Y
Z-
4
p
(A
Z
x
C
Y
Z
U
A
>
Z
'-
a
p
4
d
2
J
K
J
-
d
}
!J
Z
W
U
N u
w
0
y
y)
�
iJ
>
J
-
!W
LV
CQ
9]
i0
CO
fp
/A
M
N
•]
M h
Cp
:o
U
'G
M
VJ
CA
N
W
M
ai
�D
-
Q [
N
N
N
C9
ti
CC
O h
P
O
O
O
O
O
!P
O
O
O
c
'W
O
�
I(1
O
O
O
`�
F
O
pn
!n
O
P
�tl
uJ
M
C
T
N
M
I[]
O
ff
v
I
Q
£
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
n -
0
ICI
pp
O
c
O
N c
V
Z
F
N
F
N
F
F
N
R
BSI
'])
tU
00
fL
'V C
V
IL1
W
CA
T
O
N
Q
d
F
C
W
x
T
P
T
P
P
T
O
O
O
O
O
O
•-•
2
W
'O
•O
'el
`0
`+)
`D
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
u
a]
v
•r
w
v
m
v
o-
v
yr
o-
a
v
£
o
n
�
z
. • • f • • • • • • •
__ paS2x ^ „xWR:.N992 %F9R9 tl8 972R ^ „pn929F929: "82963°
v
a
Y
]
G CO
y r
!L
U w
�i UJ
s�
xm
U .+
N
O
O
O
K
O
O
Z
a<,
o
b
0 0
u
c+ r•
m
F
n.
F
n
e
£
n
F
w
10
nl
0 c
V •C c
FP
O c
O
00
0 Q
N
K c
O
O
OC
00.:
00
0i�
•G
O P
0
O
mm
O �i
FF
N
V
IC+
O
_
_
~
co
C9
-
N
V
F•+
+CF
O p
N
F
m
[J N
r•
F
H
N
Z
N Ul C
Ul G1
Z
W
A lip
':: W
-_
•3
(n
W
R (L
C) U
OJ'
iL -
0
LOS
'!J iJ o
W
to
U)
i0 1.9
fP N
wwu
W W
t-
f•
C
0
•Y.:.:K >
nti n
o "• M'. n
n] .+
a
LL
<
fa D
O q
iL
-.
L•_ i
'�
:. L•_
lJ
J.
J J
J J
J J
J It
[J
;n i9
p) U] U
CO CU
Z 4
LL
r1
W U
C
U ]
_
S i
U1
W W le
W W U
W W
Vl n_
O
Ul
V!
U G
F F
F F
UJ U
W W
W W
W
W
7
fL
K V_
J
7
Q
2_
W
Ui L
W L
W W
!o
G C
LL
y :.
�. LL
It i iJ
LL CO
S
y
� S
J G
G �?
1'
�
C] Q
l
G
U
J
P
G
G
y
<
4
J
O
U
W
F
U
t^
i
G
U
C9
Z G
2
M
£
w
4
G
N
G
W
m
U
C
an
w
m
m
m
w
m
w
w
ro
m
w
.z
,n C.
W
.
c
U
w
m
ro
{n
0
•V
N
N
[V
N
it
O
O
O
O
O
O a
O
O V
0
iU c
0
J
P
F
•O
P
N
u;
W
Y
N
N C
N
U L
Q'x
Q
•t
V
H
Q
K
V
V
V
K
a
£
>'
Z
_ _ _ YR78SA8CARR:.p7R %R 8:778:8 ^787 R:
m
ILY
nJ
Iar
o
..a
(
d
G
£
o
v
)
N
a
o
Q
m
N
rt
m
ILY
z
Iar
J
..a
n
u•
o
�
a
z
J
J
Q
K
rt
u•� �
CONC
NNi
_8:763R:RRRFR
J
J
Q
K
CONC
NNi
.,-•
-,
��
Z Z
Z Z
Z
L
LLt
L
ti
G 1-
_
-
O
- -v
- _
-]
N
Z M
=
J
W
G U]
w
w
6
G
G Q
Q C
.r
.
V.UV
[i i[
LL
LL
J
J
.. .-+
G:.:0
J
-
NO
-
u_
a d U.
u. d U
d
CO
6
4 Y
W
rt
f
U_ d
G_ +. t
2
to
4 :1 r
d a� i
>
>
h'
E U:
C -
Y
G
- -] D
C] G
0
b
h-
LU
U NN
N NL
N
[]D
aN
O U
} C
r L:1
ll 11
w
w
N
Z
4]
p
fY
J
¢
J
W
J
d
J
O
O
U
W
S
N
N
K
U
O
7.
to
\
\
\
F-
05
N
••
<
N
N
N
[
N
N
N
w
O
O
a
N
s
nt
o
4
ro
a
o
o
v
v
w
N
lJ
\
d
o
N
cv m
w
to
:a
N
N
N
m
m
W
r
r
r`
r
r
t -
r
tY
U
t4
V
Y
K
Y
V
<
2 G
J
£
> .v
_8:763R:RRRFR
CITY OF
PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR
CHECK #5861
EMPLOYEE NAME
McGUIRE, MICHAEL A.
BLACKSTONE, GAIL
ZAWACKI, KATHRYN
BEHM, LOIS N.
JAHN, DAVID J.
SWANSON, LYLE
CUDE, LARRY J.
OSTER, ANDREA J.
MIKISKA, WILLIAM
FAUST, DANIEL F.
TAYLOR, LINDA
MATHEYS, ALANA K.
VIGNALO, DELORES A.
ANDERSON, CAROLE J.
LA MOTTE, MARLENE
AURELIUS, LUCILLE E.
SELVOG, BETTY D.
SCHADT, JEANNE L.
KELSEY, CONNIE L.
HOSCHKA, GERMAINE
VIETOR, LORRAINE S.
HENSLEY, PATRICIA A.
CARLE, JEANETTE E.
RONGSTAD, CAROLEE
COLLINS, KENNETH V.
RICHIE, CAROLE L.
SVENDSEN, JOANNE M.
NELSON, ROBERT D.
FULLER, ELAINE
OMATH, JOY E.
MARTINSON, CAROL F.
ZAPPA, JOSEPH A.
STILL, VERNON T.
SKALMAN, DONALD W.
NELSON, CAROL M.
MORELLI, RAYMOND J.
STEFFEN, SCOTT L.
ARNOLD, DAVID L.
BANICK, JOHN J.
BOHL, JOHN C.
CAHANES, ANTHONY G.
CLAUSON, DALE K.
MOESCHTER, RICHARD M.
ATCHISON, JOHN H.
PELTIER, WILLIAM F.
SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS J.
WELCHLIN, CABOT V.
MAPLEWOOD
PAY PERIOD ENDING 10/21/88
- CHECK #6013
GROSS PAY
2,538.46
1,374.10
915.70
942.11
851.56
901.92
242.40
817.66
157.60
1,934.90
744.59
968.06
949.66
1,190.29
231.00
1,788.50
542.50
906.46
443.16
628.06
838.29
553.64
955.48
244.50
1,996.50
819.26
1,134.91
1,735.70
314.03
834.46
804.06
1,561.48
1,378.28
1,805.18
2,069.08
1,378.28
1,505.33
1,561.48
1,518.04
1,454.52
1,735.70
1,403.88
1,701.62
1,403.88
1,734.55
1,327.08
1,555.49
CITY OF
PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR
CHECK #5861
EMPLOYEE NAME
LANG, RICHARD J.
PALMA, STEVEN T.
HERBERT, MICHAEL J.
DREGER, RICHARD C.
MEEHAN, JR., JAMES E.
STAFNE, GREGORY L.
BECKER, RONALD D.
HALWEG, KEVIN R.
STOCKTON, DERREL,L T.
PAULOS, JR., PAUL G.
BOWMAN, RICK A.
KARIS, FLINT D.
HEINZ, STEPHEN J.
GRAF, DAVID M.
THOMALLA, DAVID J.
YOUNGREN, JAMES G.
RAZSKAZOFF, DALE E.
VORWERK, ROBERT E.
BERGERON, JOSEPH A.
MELANDER, JON A.
EMBERTSON, JAMES M.
WILLIAMS, DUANE J.
RABINE, JANET L.
STAHNKE, JULIE A.
BOYER, SCOTT K.
RYAN, MICHAEL P.
FEHR, JOSEPH
NELSON, KAREN A.
FLAUGHER, JAYME L.
HAIDER, KENNETH G.
CHLEBECK, JUDY M.
WEGWERTH, JUDITH A.
MEYER, GERALD W.
KANE, MICHAEL R.
LUTZ, DAVID P.
KLAUSING, HENRY F.
SCHMOOCK, JOHN
HELEY, RONALD J.
OSWALD, ERICK D.
FREBERG, RONALD L.
CASS, WILLIAM C.
LINDBLOM, RANDY
ELIAS, JAMES G.
PECK, DENNIS L.
PRIEBE, WILLIAM
IRISH, BRUCE A.
GESSELE, JAMES T.
MAPLEWOOD
PAY PERIOD ENDING 10121188
- CHECK #6013
GROSS PAY
1,425.46
1,169.70
1,454.28
1,691.28
1,560.38
1,416.83
1,454.28
1,936.47
1,378.28
1,035.88
1,375.98
1,390.28
1,481.17
1,541.99
1,454.37
1,514.70
1,454.28
1,467.08
1,441.55
1,604.98
1,482.90
1,432.12
1,010.01
967.15
832.65
1,735.34
742.18
968.75
1,084.69
1,934.10
986.46
465.59
1,162.89
1,301.58
1,097.82
1,160.22
783.26
1,118.62
959.37
1,105.66
1,596.68
848.86
1,280.06
1,280.06
1,210.46
1,521.48
1,233.66
CITY OF
PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR
CHECK #5861
EMPLOYEE NAME
GEISSLER, WALTER M.
METZ, TERRY
LOFGREN, JOHN. R.
ODEGARD, ROBERT D.
BRENNER, LOIS J.
KRUMMEL, BARBARA A.
STAPLES, PAULINE
JONES, LUTHER
TRAVERS, DANIEL L.
ANDERSON, ROBERT S.
LINDORFF, DENNIS P.
GARRY, WILLIAM
HELEY, ROLAND B.
MARUSKA, MARK A.
BURKE, MYLES R.
GERMAIN, DAVID A.
MISKELL, C.
SHELDON, L.
HANNEGAN, A.
COLLINS, ANDREA
SCHMIESING, J.
MUNTER, B.
PODPESKAR, K.
VAN WYK, K.
WILHELMSON, C.
CLEAVELAND, K.
HERBER, TODD
ANDERSON, C.
BESETH, JR., R.
WILHELMSON, T.
KING, S.
NELSON, J.
ADAMS, N.
WARD, ROY G.
TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS J.
GREW- HAYMAN, JANET M.
NELSON, JEAN
HORSNELL, JUDITH A.
HUTCHINSON, ANN E.
BARTA, MARIE L.
DOHERTY, KATHLEEN M.
OLSON, GEOFFREY W.
MISKELL, NANCY
LIVINGSTON, JOYCE L.
GENEROUS, ROBERT
EKSTRAND, THOMAS G.
JOHNSON, RANDALL L.
MAPLEWOOD
PAY PERIOD ENDING 10/21/88
- CHECK #6013
GROSS PAY
1,268.47
848.86
926.31
1,797.30
968.86
417.23
1,499.88
72.00
108.00
1,054.46
1,099.10
783.26
1,126.46
1,291.08
1,147.26
1,126.46
12.50
50.00
130.00
28.60
50.00
80.00
83.75
90.00
12.50
107.50
80.00
80.00
67.50
12.5
75.00
80.00
33.00
406.40
1,196.68
1,024.86
314.03
502.83
499.72
808.70
920.07
1,786.10
215.36
421.07
333.20
1,472.63
1,310.86
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 10/21/88
CHECK #5861 - CHECK #6013
EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY
OSTROM, MARJORIE
1,494.28
CARVER, NICHOLAS N.
1,138.46
WENGER, ROBERT J.
1,233.66
LACASSE, CASEY
260.00
NADEAU, EDWARD A.
1,136.34
NAGEL, BRYAN
796.06
MULWEE, GEORGE W.
1,104.86
NUTESON, LAVERNE S.
1,478.28
BREHEIM, ROGER W.
1,104.86
EDSON, DAVID B.
1,051.85
MULVANEY, DENNIS M.
1,212.86
SPREIGL, GEORGE C.
1,009.66
$155,786.75
PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION
CITY & COUNTY EMP CR UNION
AFSCME 2725
MN MUTUAL LIFE INS 19 -3988
METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOC
MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM
L.E.L.S.
ZI $ 6,733.51
Cl 22,461.00
U1 435.1
160.00
U3 18.00
Z2 247.00
P1 546.00
$ 30,600.61
GRAND TOTAL $186,387.36
\r
i
i
i
Agenda No
AGENDA REPORT
T0:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
City Manager
Finance Director
ORDINANCE TO INCREASE HYDRANT CHARGE RATES
(Second Reading)
November 16, 1988
Action by Council:
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected —
slate
The 1989 Budget adopted by the Council includes a provision to increase
hydrant charge rates by 8.6 %. The reason for the increase is to finance
higher water system operations costs and to finance unassessed water system
improvements. Based upon a long -range financial forecast, annual increases in
hydrant charge rates of about 8.6% will be needed through 1999. This is based
on the assumptions that all three water tanks will need to be repainted
between 1997 - 1999, that inflation will average 5% annually and most future
water improvements will be financed completely by special assessments.
The attached ordinance will implement an 8.6% increase in rates and will
increase revenues annually by $14,620. As a result of this rate change,
single - family homes will be charged an additional $1.00 per year. It is
recommended that the Council approve the first reading of the attached
ordinance.
DFF:kaz
�r
r
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MAPLEWOOD CODE
RELATING TO HYDRANT CHARGE RATES
BE IT ORDAINED BY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Section 35 -52 of the Maplewood Code is hereby adopted
to read as follows:
There shall be levied a hydrant charge against all properties
benefitting from fire protection created by the availability of
water. Such charge shall be imposed only within the St. Paul
Water District service area where water mains are located. The
hydrant charge shall be levied whether or not the property is
connected to water mains. The rates shall be as follows:
(1) The quarterly residential rates shall be:
Single Family Dwelling $3.25
Townhouse 3.25
Duplex 6.50
Apartment 2.60
Condominium 3.25
Mobile Home 3.25
(2) Non - residential rates shall be as follows:
Class A - over 300 MGY - $.08 per 1,000 gallons
Class B - 0 -299 MGY - $.12 per 1,000 gallons
Minimum rate - $3.25 per quarter
(3) The rate for properties used jointly for residential and
commercial purposes that are not metered separately shall be
billed at non - residential rates.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force beginning
January 1, 1989.
City Manager
Action by Council:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
Agenda Number
Endorsed
AGENDA REPORT Modified—
Rejecte
—
Date--
Finance Director / ��
BUDGET TRANSFER: GENERAL GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT
November 18, 1988
INTRODUCTION
Budget transfers from the contingency account are needed in the General
Government Department for Division 101 - Legislative and Division 103 - Legal.
Additional money is needed for service recognition pins, an employee Christmas
party and legal costs.
BACKGROUND
The attached service recognition program was recently adopted. To implement
this, 50 pins need to be ordered for the presentations to be in January.
These pins will cost $600. The cost for future years will be significantly
lower as this first year involves the presentation of pins that would have
been given in past years.
In addition to the $600 for recognition pins, $250 will be needed to finance
the employee Christmas party that you are planning. This party should be
specified as additional compensation for services to be a valid legal
expenditure (see Minnesota Cities Magazine, November 1988, pp. 38 -39).
Legal expenditures for 1988 are in excess of the budget. The amount of these
expenditures fluctuates greatly from year to year depending upon the number
and complexity of cases being handled. Based upon expenditures to date and
projections for the balance of the year, a transfer of $57,000 is
needed.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that budget transfers of $57,850 from the General Fund
Contingency Account be approved.
1 of 2
AGENDA REPORT: Budget Transfer: General Government Department
November 18, 1988
COUNCIL ACTION
It is recommended that the Council:
(1)
approve
a $600 transfer
from the General Fund Contingency Account to
account
101 - 101 -4120 for
the purchase of service recognition pins;
(2)
approve
a $250 transfer
from the General Fund Contingency Account to
account
101- 101 -4120 to
finance an employee Christmas party as
additional compensation
for services to be provided by employees; and
(3)
approve
a $57,000 transfer from the General Fund Contingency Account to
account
101 - 103 -4480 to
finance 1988 legal costs.
DFF:kaz
Attachment
2 of 2
SERVICE RECOGNITION
It is the City of Maplewood's intent to give special recognition to employees
for dedicated service to the City. The recognition should be sincere and given
with appreciation for the length of service.
A. SERVICE RECOGNITION GIFTS
- Employees with 10, 15 and 20 years of service will receive a gold
maple leaf lapel pin with the appropriate number at the bottom.
Employees with 25 years of service will receive a gold maple leaf
lapel pin with a diamond.
Employees with 30 years of service will receive a gold maple leaf
lapel pin with two diamonds.
B. PRESENTATION OF RECOGNITION GIFT
Employees will be presented their gift in January of each year in
recognition of the appropriate years of service attained during the
preceding year.
Employees with 25 or 30 years of service will be presented their
recognition gift at a reception with an invitation to all employees
on or near their anniversary date.
�F -
Action by CounoShgt
MEMORANDUM
Endors
Modified,—
Rej noted. —
TO: City Manager Date _.—
FROM: City Clerk
RE: Budget Transfer - Publishing
DATE: November 23, 1988
It is requested that $1500.00 be transferred from the
Contingency Fund to the Publishing Fund to cover the increase in
the amount of ordinances, hearing notices, etc., that have needed
to be published.
N
i
Action by Council'.
Endorsed_.__.._.r.-
Modi C:led._,.A..._..s
MEMORANDUM
ilo,jooted --
Date
TO: Michael A. McGuire, City-Manager
FROM: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Parks and Recreat' n
SUBJECT: Vista Hills Park Master Plan
DATE: November 22, 1988
INTRODUCTION:
We are at the point in the planning process which requires a Master
Plan for Vista Hills Park. The Park and Recreation Commission has
tabulated the results of over 250 returned surveys from the Vista
Hills Community and now recommends that we proceed to the hiring of a
Park Planner to prepare three possible site plans for the Commissions
review and future presentation to the community.
FET00C6 i111M
The Director of L'a'rks and Recreation prepared topo maps, survey results,
home locations around Vista Hills Park, and future development informa—
tion.for a request for proposals for a Master Plan. Mr. Keith Wehrman, of
Wehrman, Bergly Associates, Inc., who has been involved in our Park
Planning contracts and supervision of three neighborhood parks and the ad—
dition to the Hazelwood Soccer Complex was requested to prepare a response
proposal for Vista Hills (attached). His Proposal has been reviewed by
the Park and Recreation Commission, and it is their recommendation that it
be accepted with three concept studies and their cost estimates rather
than five concepts and cost estimates. These reductions and presentation
time costs have been approved by Mr. Wehrman, and will reduce the proposal
from $7,760 to $5,560. Funding for this plan is included in the Capital
Improvement Document as a prior year (1988) project.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is requested that the City Council authorize the hiring of Wehrman,
Bergly Associates; Inc., to prepare Master Plans for Vista Hills Park
at a cost of $5,560 and to approve funding from the Commercial PAC
account.
November 8, 1988
Mr. Robert Odegard
Director of Parks and Recreation
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Re: Proposal for Park Planning Services
Vista Hills Park
Dear Mr. Odegard:
wehrman
bergly
associates
inc
n, plaza bldg., ste. 220
5217 wayzata blvd.
minneapolls, mn 55416
612 544 7576
Following our meeting with you on October 27, I visited the Vista Hills
Park site. This visit, along with information you provided, gives us a
sound basis for preparing our proposal. We appreciate the time you
spent and the opportunity to propose planning services for Vista Hills
Park.
We propose the following planning steps for your review and comment:
1. Review the basic information you provided and obtain additional
basic data related to soils, watershed, general drainage, etc.
2. Inspect and photograph the site and surrounding area.
3. Analyze data collected and prepare a graphic summary depicting the
site analysis.
4. Prepare a- fri+rrimam -e+- three, arid- a- maximum_of....£a.ve, concept studies
delineating alternate types of development. The alternatives would
vary between a minimal development nature park through an intensly
developed neighborhood park with playfields, hard - surfaced areas,
etc.
5. Prepare concept stage improvement cost estimates for each concept.
6. Review site analysis, concepts and estimates with City staff and
revise concepts as required.
7. Review site analysis, concepts and estimates with City Parks Commission
and revise concepts as required.
8. Present site analysis, concepts and estimates to neighborhood group
at public hearing, responding to questions and comments as appropriate.
9. Prepare contract documents, administer bidding and provide adminis-
tration and inspection services during construction of Vista Hills
Park.
planning • landscape architecture
I
November 8, 1988
Mr. Robert Odegard
Page Two
I believe the above.program responds to your needs as we discussed.
However, please feel free to adjust the program as you may deem appro-
priate. With this in mind, we submit the fee for each step separately
for your convenience:
Step 1 $ 540.00 Step 5 1 200.DR �{aO
Step 2 $ 240.00 Step 6 $ 240.00
Step 3 $1,080.00 Step 7 $ •- 360:00- :V!lo
Step 4 7$3;500 00 9 /00 Step 8 $ -699,00— 116)0
Total fee for Steps 1 through 8 $7,760:00 ---
The fee for Step 9 will depend upon the ultimate construction budget,
and therefore, we suggest the attached graph be used in determining that
fee.
We look forward to continuing our service to the City.
Respectfully submitted,
WEHR N BBBEERRG�LY ASSOCIATES, INC.
B. Keith Wehrman
President
BKW /clm
Attachment
lll
GOt15 (PLUG fION uv&r -( N MIL IONh 0 170L-L-&rvl
01,21 0.0 0,1 .0.5 1 7
s
E -6
Action by Council:
Yndorsed --.—
MEMORANDUM Modifie
ReJected
To: City Manager Date - .
From: Director of Community Development
Subject: Authorization to Hire Part -time Clerk- typist
Date: November 15, 1988
This is a request to hire the part -time clerk- typist that was
approved in the 1989 budget for our department. This position
is now being filled by a temporary employee.
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the hiring of the part -time clerk- typist approved by
the Council in the 1989 budget.
GOBUUGET
AGENDA ITEM E f q
AGENDA REPORT
Action by Council:
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Engineer End.orsed_.____.- -
SUBJECT: Ferndale Street Storm Sewer, Project 87 -20 Modifiod..
Change Order One RQected_.._--
DATE: November 22, 1988 Tate
Enclosed is a proposed change order for the subject project and
recommendation of approval by the project engineer. Final
easement negotiations necessitated revisions in the contract
plans covered by the proposed change order. It is recommended
that the attached.resolution be .adopted.
jc
Attachments
w
AGENDA ITEM E f q
AGENDA REPORT
Action by Council:
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Engineer End.orsed_.____.- -
SUBJECT: Ferndale Street Storm Sewer, Project 87 -20 Modifiod..
Change Order One RQected_.._--
DATE: November 22, 1988 Tate
Enclosed is a proposed change order for the subject project and
recommendation of approval by the project engineer. Final
easement negotiations necessitated revisions in the contract
plans covered by the proposed change order. It is recommended
that the attached.resolution be .adopted.
jc
Attachments
W, 0110
�.( T A
TOL TZ, KING, VALL, A
i �1L
AND KING.D
AND AS TES, I
TE
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 66101 -1893
612/2924400
FAX 612/292-0083
November 4, 1988
Mr. Bruce Irish
Assistant City Engineer
1830 County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Re: TH 61 Watermain
Ferndale Street Drainage
Maplewood, Minnesota
Commission Nos. 9225 and 9301
Dear Mr. Irish:
Enclosed is Estimate No. 1 for Lamettl and Sons in the amount of
$33,576.99.
Also enclosed is Estimate No. i in the amount of $27,372.90, which Includes
Change Order No. 1 for $2,871.86, for Meyer Contracting.
We recommend approving the payments and change order for the above
projects.
Sincerely yours, o
Larry D. Boh rer, P.E.
LOB : j
Enclosures
TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Engineers- Architects - Planners
St. Paul, Minn.. Oct. 27 19$I -, Comm. No. 9301 Change Order No. 1
You are hereby directed to make the following change to your contract dated
August 22 , 19 88 The change and the work affected thereby Is subject
to all contract stipulations and covenants. This Change Order will
(Increase) (decrease) (not - change) the contract sum by Two Tho nd
Elaht Hundred Seventy-one and B6 /100------- ------- Dollars ($ 2,571.86 ).
This is change order provides for the addition of the following to Division
II - Northern Storm Sewer:
1. Plant three 2 -1/2 trees i Lump Sum @ $1,371.86 $ 1,371.86
2. 15 Flared End Section w /Trash Guard 1 Lump Sum @ $1,500.00 $ 1,500.00
Net Change Order
Amount of Original Contract
Additions approved to date
Deductions approved to date
Contract amount to date
Amount of this Change Order
Revised Contract Amount
Date
Approve Meyer Contracting
Contractor
gy /�ctT/�ev. �7�Z�i �i/ C• 3 /-p_
+ $ 2,871.86
(Nos.
(Nos. )
(Add) (Beduet) (Not- Ghanged)
• 11 •11
TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED
Larry RV Bohrer. P.E.
White - Owner*
Pink - Contractor*
B l u e - TKDA*
Yellow - Field
Goldenrod - Department
Green - TKDA Main File
*Only copies needing signatures.
RESOLUTION
DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has
heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 87 -20 and has let a
construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
429, and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said
contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 87-20
Change Order One.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby
authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by
executing said Change Order One.
-
&ot1ou by Ouoo:ll:
o `
Eu8uroed~~~.__-~~
/ Mo8lf1o8....—
/
��
AGENDA ITEM_�� — o
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Brooks Court Water Main.Reconstruction, Project B7-41
Acce of Project
p
DATE: November 22, 1980
The subject city project is complete" It is recommended that the
attached resolutipn be passed.
jc
Attachment
RESOLUTION
ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT
WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has
determined that Brooks Court Water Main Reconstruction, City
Project 87-41, is complete and recommends acceptance of the
project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MHPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that City Project 87-41 is complete and
maintenance of these improvements is accepted by the city.
Release of any retaina9e or escrow is hereby authorized.
`
/
Action by Voqnoi0
�.
Endorsed ..- ..... ^ .. ..
.~-
Modifled..~~.~~~
t d~.~~~_~.
Do�**�* ~~
Da"
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Maplewood Knoll, Project 87-16--Acceptance of Project
DATE: November 22, 1988
The pubject developer project is complete" It is recommended
that the attached resolution be adopted,
jc
Attachment
RESOLUTION
ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT
WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has
determined that. Maplewood Knoll, City Project 87-16, is complete
and recommends acceptance of the project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that City Project 87-16 is complete and
maintenance of these improvements is accepted by the city"
Release of any retainage or escrow is hereby authorized"
J E- /0
AGENDA REPORT
To: City Manager Michael McGuire
From: Director of Public Safety Kenneth V. Collinsr� /1
Subject: Application For Liquor License
Date: November 21, 1988
Introduction
Aot. an by Coune3l:
}indorsed_ _,..<,
Modified_ — m
Rejecte
Date --
Kenneth L. Kufahl has made application for an intoxicating liquor license
at 3069 White Bear Avenue. The establishment will be operated under the
name Esteban's Restaurant.
Background
An investigation has been done on the individual. He has no known contacts
with the police, nor can we find that he holds a liquor license at any
other establishment in the state.
Recommendation
After a careful background investigation on this individual and a discus—
sion with him, I do not find sufficient reason to deny his application for
an intoxicating liquor license.
Action Required
Application for intoxicating liquor license for City Council review and
approval or denial.
KVC:js
cc City Clerk
Liquor File
88— .014781
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
APPLICATION FOR MTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE
TWS APPUCA170M SBALL 13E SUBMITTED IN DUPLICATE. Please do not use initials.
{Cboevar shall knowingly and wilfully falsify the answers to the foilowing questionnaire shall be
deemed guilty of perjury and shall be punlshed accordingly.
In asswerbly the following questions "APPLICANT'S" shall be governed as follows: For a Cor-
poration one officer shall execute this application for all officers, directors and stockholders. For a part -
aerablp one of the "APPLICANTS" shall execute this application for W members of the partnership.
EVERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED
L L Kenneth Lee Kufahl Manager
(Individual owaey oar or partner) -
for and In behalf of himself
,
busby apply for an on Sale Intoxicating Liquor License to he located at
Location is part of lot 15, Maplewood Mall, 3069 White Bear Avenue,
Maplewood, MN 55109
(Gin address and lent deeedptlon) in the City of
Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No.
95 of Maplewood
2. Give applicants' date of birth:
Ken neth Lee Kufahl 1 7 07 66
(Dar) (month) (Year)
S. The residence for each of the applicants named herein for the past five years is As follows:
3657 Hillsboro Avenue North, New Hope, MN 55427
4. L the applicant a citizen of the United States?_ Yes
If naturalized state date and place of naturalizatio
If a corporation or partnership, state citizenship including naturalization of each officer or partner.
5. 71e person who executes this application shall give wife's or husband's full name and address—
LeeAnne Kufahl 3657 Hillsboro Avenue N orth, New Noce MN 55427
8 ' What a applicant and associates In this application followed for the past five years?
�Ssteban's xican Restaurant General Manager
,i
7. U partnership, state memo and address of each partner
H a corpontlon, date of incorporatio , state In
which Incorpora , amount of authorized capitalization
amount of paid in capi
If a subsidiary of any other corporation, so ate
give purpose of corporatl
name and address of &Ii officers, directors and stockholders and the number of shares held by each:
(Name) (Address) (City)
If incorporated under the laws of another state, is corporation authorized to do business in this
State? Number of certificate of authority
If this application Is for a new Corporation, include a certified copy of Articles of Incorporation and
By -Lawn.
S. On what floor is the establishment located, or to be located? first
9. H operating under a zoning ordinance, how is the location of the building classified?
Zoned for Restaurant 1s the building located within the prescribed area for such license?
Yea
10. Is the establishment located near an academy, college, university, church, grade or high school?
No State the approximate distance of the establishment from such school or churc
3/4 mile
11. State name and address of owner of buildingWo Company, 99 South Owasso Blv d.
St. Paul. MN 55127 ; has owner of building any connection, directly or In.
directly, with applicant? No
12 Are the taxes on the above property delinquent? No
18. State whether applicant, or any of his associates In this application, have ever had an application
ter a Liquor License rejected by any municipality or State authority; If so, give date and details
11. Has the applicant, or any of his aseociatee In this application, during the five yeah immediately
preceding this application ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked for
any violation of such laws or local ordinances; if so, give date and detail No
I& State whether applicant, or any of big associates in this application, during that past five years
were ever convicted of any Liquor Law violations or any crime In this state, or any other state, or
under Federal Laws, and If so, give date and detail No
I$. L applicant, or any of hie associates in this application, a member of the governing body of the
municipality in which this license Is to be issued? No m if go, in what capacity?
17.. State whether any person other than Applicants has any right, title or Interest in the furniture,
fixtures, or equipment In the premises for which license Is applied, and if so, give names and details
18. Have appliante any Interest whatsoever, directly or Indirectly, in any other liquor establishment
In the State of Minnesota? No . Give name and address of such establishmen
19. Furnish the names and addresses of at least three business references, including one bank refer-
te Gria¢s Cooper. 489 No. Prior . St. Paul
Monarch Foodservice 9605 54th Avenue-North. Plymouth MN
Riverside Bank 7760 France Avenue South, Bloomington. MN
20. Do you possess a retail dealer's identification card Issued by the Liquor Control Commissioner
which will expire December 81st of this year? Give number of sam #6100
21. Does applicant Intend to sell Intoxicating liquor to other than the consumer?
22. State whether applicant Intends to possess, operate or permit the possession or operation of, on
the licensed premises or in any room adjoining the licensed premises, any slot machine, dice, gam-
bling device and apparatus, or permit any gambling therei No
28. Are the premises now occupied, or to be occupied, by the applicant entirely separate and exclusive
from any other business establishment? Yes
24. State trade tame to be use Esteban Is Re staurant
26. State name of person that will operate store_ Kenneth Lee Kufahl
26. Give Federal Retail Liquor Dealer's Tax Stamp Number
27. If off We license Is bafng applied for, do you intend to deliver liquor by vehicle? If so,
Biala number of motor vehicle permits Issued by Liquor Control Commissioner for carrent year
28. If you are building anew building for the purposes for which this application is being made, Piease
submit plans and speciflations with this application.
Y9. Financing of the construction of this building "I be as follows:
80. Furnish a personal financial statement with this application. If a partnership, furnish flninaial state.
most of each partner.
81. Give description of type of operation if this is an on -sale license application (i.e. whether cock -
tall lounge, site club, restaurant, etc., specifying capacity by number of customers and any other
pertinent data) as ra,lrant c r i li i g in Mpy 4ron fnnein
82. What previous experience have you had in the operation of the type of business described In the
answer to No. 81 above Kenneth has b een employed with Esteban's
Since 2/1/81.
88. Applicant, and his associates in this application, will strictly comply with all the laws of the State
of Minnesota governing the taxation and the sale of intoxicating liquor; rules and regulations
promulgated by the Liquor Control Commissioner; and all ordinances of the municipality; and
I hereby certify that 1 have read the foregoing questions and that the answers to said questions
are true of my own knowledge.
(61anr,t t Appllunt)
Subscribed and sw orn to before me this
day of , , 19 �tl
<^.� .......... .__
�A l
v.
o
THIS APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED WITH YOUR CHECK
FOR THE FIRST LiCENSE PERIOD.
IIEPORT ON APPLICANT OR APPLICANTS SY POLICE DEPARTMENT
This L to oerttfy that the applicant, or his associates named hers %. have not been:convicted with-
in the past eve yam for any violation of Laws of the State of Minnesota, or Municipal Ordinances
r4aft to Intoxicating Uquor, except as hereinafter stated
MAPLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT
Approved by
Title.
REPORT ON PREMISES BY FIRE DEPARTMENT
This is to certify that the premises herein described have been inspected and that all Laws of the
State of Minnesota mad Municipal Ordinances I—stiog to Fire Protection have been complied with.
MAPLEWOOD FIRE DEPARTMENT
Approved by:
Ties.
inliX l ag l rn u Illr.runl r.rr.n
R1.11.,
Bond N47- 0130- 11835 -81 -1 Renewal
1t'A'OIY ALL PEIISONS Br TIiESB PRh'SFN7B, That ..............rr,......
........ r..... r ........:.... ........ ...
............. .........,.....................
, Kenneth Kufehl� .
...r rr. ....... .r.,...aaprincipal....aand..
Unis uaranty Company
....... ted State - Fidelity &G
'..'. .. r ^• .. ..assurety are held and firmly bound
. ...................... ..
unto the AIUNfCIPNLITr OF maPlmp!.. , the County of Ramsey -
St age a /Ninnewota, in the penal sum of.... Three Thousand Dollars and „00(90 „($3;x000 OOhlollara,
lawful Money of the United States to be paid to said municipality for its benefit and for lie benef(t of
all persons sap'erinp damages by reason of the breach of the conditions hereof, for which payment well
and truly to be "lade we bind ourselves, our heirs, sudoeesors, and legal representatives, Jointly and sever.
ally, firmly by these presents:
THE CONDITIONS OF T1118 OIIL104TIOX ARE SUCH, That whereas said priacipal......... •� hm s .......
been llcer+eed, for the terns of...... r,.. l _ ?rr31.'.Q.Q....A.Q...12 31, -89
.r............ .........fromt /e.315t ....... .................
day of,; . . . .. . ......... ..
,Decemb . er 19...BE, by Me Governing Body of $aid municipality to sell intocicat-
....
. tap liquors as defined by law at retail only for consumption "ON TILE PREMISES” desoribed as followe,
IO•witr ,.,...Kenneth;Kufahl - -
.. r.. r.... r...... r, r...... r . .............r....,............
DBA:, Esteban's of Map l e wood .,.. r,... r,., r ........................ ...............................
... .. .... I .......... 306 Bear „A,v „enueMaplewoodmN 55109
... .......................... _........ r r............ .r...............:.............
ire salt ''"unioipaliy, at whtoh promises said prtnoipat...... ooneroi ... .S and operate ...S a ........................... .
Restaurant
............................................................... r......., ......... . ................. rr ... ...........,,.. r.....,.. rr... r.r ..................... . ........... . .......................... I ..... ...a# defined by laav:
1'O1 THEIIEFOBE, If said principal ...... shall (a) obey the lot's r•elatlnp to such licensed business;
(b) shall to said muPdotpality when due all taxes, license fees, penalties and other charges provided
by ' Rj. Wrnll, . in. //e man' of ny violation of 0116 provisions of any law relating to this retail
1 lA
pf.Ur14yl,Palm {Q�j(gpQ►a orfeit'lets hand to said m.rantoipaiily; (d) sha,tl pay to the ear leaf.
u/ he Mn e. 6EGlih"Stril Jig daniages for death w• i+tfury caused b or resulti
mr 8 p from th
riololion o
f y pru'lstone of law r•etnttnp thereto, TIIIS OB/,j0ATI0N SI/A/./, BECOAIIi VOI)q;
OTIIERIVISE IT SMALL BE AND RBAfAIN OF FULL FORCE AND BFFBCT.
ll' ibless our hand # and seale this ............ 24Ah, ,d of ;• October BB
- Signed, Sealed, and Delivered in the Presoneq of
. . ...............................
Kenneth Kufahl
• X (Seat)
X .
,de to pri eipa • ................... BY `i 'u "7 N .. •^yip ........(Scat)
... .................... r.............. rr:. ................ ....... ..,....• United. States. Fide.l. .G aran . a e )
JA
I � �, nn u tJ' ..Cam P U)S' al
...
. . kAiKrCK.
.... to •el' �n,�jR.dtt�L at)
y E still "'t au'lien: - f e t8'N'R'2y- in =F�L
X ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PRINCIPAL
For Individlsal
STATE OF ALIXXBSOTA,
carm( or p " l.$.
On O+ia...CZ.....Lday of .... .......... O(;,&A / ..... , . ... .. y,..,,:._, IB..A.9.., before nee, a nolary publio within
............... ��
and for onid couniy appeared ..................... X./�X'�
.............. ,..
t o file known to be the person signing ae prh+ripal herein, and stated that ......he signod the same of 11.
elan frcc wilt and a000rd.
.. .:................
1 .c•
<.... CIi'i: r. ATr .....s i ....... "" " �*11111111111A: ............... .... .......................... ...... .
r.. a:, A .............. r.... .......... ..........,.............County,
(BcniJ dfpoanimtwione glue „rr /��(��
FOR CORPORATION
SuTB Or mixyESOTd,
.
Onthk ......... .........day of . ... . ... ......................... ..... . .... . 18.........., before me opfwaret
,..... .............................to me personally known, who,
beirrll duty sworn, did Raft tint ......red G tha ........................ . ... ..... ...................... of the ..... .................... ... ..,..., r .
that Nee seat affixed to Eke for•aaoino inelrunent is tha eorpoeate seat of said corporo.Onrtt that Paid.
instrranent was stsaned and seated on behalf of said rar•fwration bit amtharity of its Posen of ntreotaea,
used said.... oaknarbtedaad Raird. lnsh•o.mru.t ter bit the fees not n.ml deed. of sold.
eoeporatton.
Notary Pabli e ................:....................• ............................... Coto t if,
.Minnesota
(Roat.) MyoomrnASat onexplrse ............................... ........................................
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SURETY
ST.ITS OF MINNR.SOTA, l ei.
County oJHENNEPIN ................ ............•.............. .
Onthis .................. 29. Xk1 ............ ... ...,.......................slay of..........._October .................1...." 19..88.., before ore
.... .er
!rr•eonalty appeared........... l, i,zabeth........... aul, sen .... ....................... I ....... ........... . ..............
to me personally known, who befu$ by me ditty sworn., did say that .. 5 ha is attorneytnJract of the
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company
.................... ..... . ..... .
that the seat atftwd to the forepinp Instrument to the rnrtwrats seat of that corporation and that said
instrument was euouted lee behalf o/ the 'corporation by onthori.ty of Its board of dir•eotors, ar_j said
El izabeth L Paulsen .... .... aoknowledaal.s d instrument to be t afro rE nrut dred of said
e nrpnrattnn - ........... l
•• m.• �M
..u••! ............
DEBORAH M NELSON ,
NOTMY►Uelw• P"nnn"A' Notary publto ,.......Hennepin .........:.... ....Count
HENNEPIN COUNTY °• ° ° °° °••• °° 9.
try rR Iuwe UPI F eb. e, 1191 Allnnnaota
My commission expires ............
..............:............ .............
The forepoinp bond, tojether• rcith the surety thereon, is hereby opprmved this ......................... ...............................
day ................................................................•....... .................19............
The .....
of the.Muntolpaltty
............................................. ............................... ..........................Clerk
By
F �
o
A
p 4 h
z0
Y
�F
ta Y
i3 b ~
A
i
1 1 ,
CERTIFIED COPY
GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY
»J '
No.....___lW
Knew so Nen.N these Presents:
That UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
State of Maryland and having its Principal office at the City of Baltimore, In the State of Maryland, does hereby constitute and appoint
Ridlard E. BoyntOn Elizabeth Pmllsen Victoria R. Holm and Deborah M. Nelson
of the air of Millnewa its State of Minnesota
its true and lawful attorneys in and for the State of Minnesota
for the following purposes, to wit:
To sign Its name as surety to, and to execute, seal and acknowledge any and all bonds, and to respectively -do and perform any and
all acts and things set forth in the resolution of the Board of Directors of the said UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY
COMPANY, a certified copy of which In hereto annexed and made a part of this Power of Attorney; and the said UNITED STATES
FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, through us. Its,Boird of Directors, hereby ratifies and confirms all and whatsoever)VOCIII@C
anyone of the said Richard E. Boynton and the said Elizabeth Paulsen and the said
Victoria R. Hole and the said Deborah M. Nelson
may lawfully do in the premless by virtue of these preseats.
fit Witter" Whereof, the mid UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY has caused this instrument to be
sealed with its corporate seal, duly attested by the signatures of its Vim-President and Assistant Secretary, this 23rd day of
WtgdMr 11 A.D. 19 88
UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY.
(Signed) of........q?n;�",9y, Wdt80n .
. .....................
Vice-President.
(SEAL) Pabert J. White
(Signed) .......................... ...............................
..� Assistant Secretary.
STATE OF MARYLAND.
BALTIMORE a '
On this 23rd day of svtadxr , A. D. 19 8Q before me personally came
Charles B. Watson , Viee•Proeldent of the UNITED STATES - FIDELITY AND GUARANTY
COMPANY and Robert J. White , Assistant Secretary of said Company, with both of
whom i am personally acquainted, who being by me severally duly sworn, said that they, the mid Charles B. Watson
and Robert J. Mhite were respectively the Vice•Preeldent and the Assistant Secretary of the said UNITED
STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing Power of Attorney;
that they each knew the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said Power of Attorney was such corporate seal, that It was
so fixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation, and that they signed their names thereto by like order as VicePraeldent
and Assistant Secretary, respectively, of the Company..
My commission expires the first day in July, A. D.19.�.
(Signed) M. B=t
.................
Notary NU(ie.
FS J (1211
T
.�ft. 1 , TrT
INC. ' 7NM pERTNROATB 1B ISSUED 'AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION' ONLY AND CONFL -00
ENCY, NO E N D O UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND
330 Second Avenue South
Suite 840 EXTEND OR ALTER THE COYERAOE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW
."'� ._._ _.. .__... ..__._
Suit
ea MN 55401 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
I COMPANY .
CODE SUB401E ! LETTER' A... CIGNA .INSURANCE COMPANY ...
... _ ...:. ........_ __ ._.__ .•_ !'.COMPANY B
WOURM _ _....,..._ LETTER
ESTEBAN'S INTERNATIONAL, INC. t., - — - - __.._.. __ _.
DBA: ESTEBAN'S MEXICAN RESTAURANTS LEM
4208 Park Glen Road __...
St, Louis Park, MN 55416 � D
COMPANY E
LETTER
COVERAGES 4 ;,...
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY: ERIOD
INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO i WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THh INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
X)
TR
TYPE OF WSURANCE
POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION
DATE (MM/DDIYY) DATE (MWDDfYY)
ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS
GENERAL LIABILITY
GENERAL AGGREGATE
$1,000,
RWP DI 71 ZO 4Z 6 6 -9 -BB 6 -9 -B9
A
X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
PRODUCTS-COMPIOPSAGGREGATE t
500,
CLAIMS MADE X OCCUR,
PERSONAL 8 ADVERTISING INJURY
t
500
OWNER'S S CONTRACTOR'S PACT.
EACH OCCURRENCE'
i
500,
X COMPREHENSIVE FORM
FIRE DAMAGE (Any me fire)
t
50
MEDICAL EXPENSE (Any one perFm)
i
5,
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
COMBINED
SINGLE i
ANY AUTO
LIMIT
ALL OWNED AUTOS
BODILY
INJURY S
SCHEDULED AUTOS
(Per person)
HIRED AUTOS
BODILY
INJURY i
NON-OWNED AUTOS
(Per ecc1deni)
GARAGE LIABILITY
PROPERTY
t
DAMAGE
EXCESS LIABILITY
EACH
AGGREGATE
i OCCURRENCE
` t i
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
WORKER'S COMPENSATION
AND
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
OTHER
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSA. OCATn )NSNEHICLESRIESTMCTIONSISPECIAL ITEMS
In re: Kenneth Kufahl (Esteban's of Maplewood)
3069 White Bear Avenue
STATUTORY
i (EACH ACCIDENT)
i (DISEASE — POLICY UMIT)
t (DISEASE —EACH EMPLOY
CERTIFICATE HOLDER .: • ' - `;, s CANCELLATION ...:................
City of Maplewood SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
1380 Frost Avenue. k' EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO
Maplewood, MN 55109 �, MAIL.3O__ DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE
LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR
LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS EPRESENTATIVES.
U e AfM - 1111i REPRESENTATIVE
J
AC RD 2 &S 3/9S 'I` • � �� ORD Ti N T9"
_ .. .. .. �.... vAA •AAA � L
`Esteban',
INTERNATIONAL, INC. TM
4208 Park Glen Road
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
(612) 920-1435
October 18, 1988
Ms. Lucille E. Aurelius
City Clerk
City of Maplewood
1830 E. County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Mr. Aurelius:
I, Donald Wayne Tritch, hereby release my name from the
liquor license for Esteban's Restaurant, which is located
at 3069 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood, MN 55109
DATED:
DONALD WAYNE TRITCH
L
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
1530 a. County bad E
IYplawood, Minnesota $5109
APPLICATION FOR
SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSE
I, Kenneth Lee Kufahl _
. doing business at
3069 White Bear Avenue, Mapl
, under the business name of
Esteban's , hereby make application for
a license to sell liquor between the hours of 10:00 A.M. and 12:00 midnight on Sundays
At the above location.
I hereby certify that malt are served, and will be served on Sundays, at this location,
that there is table seating capacity for 30 or more persons at one time. and that I
presently hold on sale liquor license, issued by the City of Maplewood.
Signed,
3657 Hillsboro Avenue North
Address New Hope, MN 55427
The seating capacity at the above is 218 .
Dates October 18, 1988
License Tee is $200.00 per year. (License year is from January 1 thru December 21)
LICENSE PEE PAID
na, i i N0.
LICENSE N0.
Please do not leave any PERSONAL STATEMENT Confidential
questions unanswered.
TO
(Name of Bank)
This application to for (check two):' 17 Unsecured Credit O Joint Account
- O Secured Credit ❑ Separate Account
'Any income from alimony, child support, or maintenance payments need not be revealed unless you wish such income be relied
upon as a basis for repayment. If you are applying for an unsecured separate account you do not need to complete any
information concerning a joint applicant or other person unless you wish that the joint applicant's or other person's income be
relied upon as a basis for repayment.
First
Applicant Address
First Second
Business or occupation: Applicant Applicant
Maritl a Statue'•
Age .2_ Marred Unmarried Separated Number of Dependents
For the purpose of procuring credit from time to time with the above named bank, the following statement and information are
furnished as a complete true and accurate statement of the financial condition of the undersigned on _ , 19_
The undersigned also agrees to notify the above named bank immediately in writing of any material unfavorable change in
such financial condition.
"Please furnish this information only if your spouse will use or be contractually liable for this account.
ASSETS
Applicant A
Apnlie nt
LIABILITIES
pal
A plicact
nn
AD kant
Cash on hand and in Banks
Notes payable to Banks•Secured
U.S. Gov. Securities-See Schedule
-
Notes payable to Banks-Unsecured
Listed Securities-See Schedule
Notes payable to relatives
Receivables -Good
—
Notes payable to others
Other current assets•Itemize
Accounts and bills due
p7
Income taxes
Other taxes and interest
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
Other current liabilities•Itemize
Receivables-Doubtful
Mortgages and Contracts-See Schedule
Other Real Estate owned-See Schedule
—
Homestead
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
Automobiles
O.R.E. Mortages-See Schedule
Personal property
Mortgage on Homestead
We Insurance-Cash Value
Other debts-Itemize
Unlisted Securities-See Schedule
Due from relatives and friends
Other assets-Itemize
TOTAL LIABILITIES
NET WORTH
TOTAL ASSETS
TOTAL LIAR. s NET WORTH
SOURCE OF ANNUAL INCOME
A
Applicant
A i
ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL EXPENSE
A F luent
Applicant
Salary - s
—
Income Taxes t
Bonus and commissions s
gyp—.
Other Taxes $
—
Dividends s
Insurance Premiums t
bo
Real Estate Income $
Mortgage Payments s
{'_
Other income-Itemize • $
Rent on Business Property t
Other Expenses $
TOTAL s
CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
A liant
Sec
A I not
GENERAL INFORMATION
As endorser or comaker s
I
Are any assets pledged?
On leases or contracts s
Are you defendant in any suite or
legal actions?
Legal claims s
—
Other contingent
Liabtlities•Describe s
Personal bank accounts carried at 0C ply Mp✓„
,5
Have you ever taken bankruptcy? Explain: No
SCHEDULE OF STOCKS. BONDS AND SECURITIES
FACE VALUE.. BONDS DESCRIPTION MARKET
NO. OF SHARES • STOCKS INDICATE IN WHOSE NAME REGISTERED VALUE
SCHEDULE OF REAL ESTATE OWNED
DESCRIPTION AND IN
WHOSE NAME RECORDED
VALUE
RENT
RECD.
AMOUNT OF
ENCUMBRANCE - MORTGAGE. OR CONTRACT _
INSURANCE
AMOUNT
TERMS E MATURITY
TO WHOM PAYABLE
HOMESTEAD-
ADDRESS
.
t
. SCHEDULE OF REAL ESTATE MORTGAGES AND CONTRACTS OWNED
h �
al
7
OWNER
BENEFICIARY
S
3 4
_
MAKER
PROPERTY
COVERED
TERMS
AND
MATURITY
AMOUNT
NAME
ADDRESS
t
SCHEDULE OF LIFE INSURANCE CARRIED
NAME OF COMPANY
OWNER
BENEFICIARY
IF POLICIES ARE ASSIGNED
OR SUBJECT TO ANY
AGREEMENT - DESCRIBE
AMOUNT
VALUE H
LOAN
t
OTHER INSURANCE CARRIED
GIVE NAMES OF BANKS AND OTHER FIRMS. WHERE CREDIT HAS BEEN OBTAINED
The above Information Is true no COrfeot. You Are aulhorlaed to verity Ihle Information and retain the eppllullon whether or not It Is Approved. You are Also authorized 10 reseWe
additional credit information And answer questions an Your Credit oxpMlenCe with these applicont(A) . 1 /1�,'V•✓.L�7,/ /J�l`�.[n
)ATE 1 n�29� - — (SiBnaluii 6
Co-Appllunt ✓
)ATE (Signature)
VENDOR NUMBER - DATE CHECK NUMBER
INVOICE NO. INVOICE DATE - DESCRIPTION GROSS AMOUNT DISC. - ADJUSTMENTS NET AMOUNT
Esteban's liquor lic nse- 5040.00
Sunday Liquor licens3 200.00
TOTAL GROSS TOTAL DISCOUNT CHECK AMOUNT
RIVERSIDE
APOLIS 0 MINESOTA
BANK 17-12 1 7/910 24796 MINNE
MTERNATIONAL, INC. *r APOLI MINNESOTA
903 Marquette Avenue South OATE
Minneapolis, MN 55402 10/26/88 1 CHECK AMOUNT
** *5,240.00 * **
'Pay Only: Five thousand two hundred forty dollars and 00 /100---- -- - ------
PAY TO City of Maplewood
THE ORDER OF
L- J
UTHOR12 sGNATUR
112 2 4 7 9 611' 1:09 i001.2701: 150, L01 8i10
INT'ERNATIONAL,, INC. ,M
4208 Park Glen Road
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
(612) 920 -1435
November 3, 1988
Mr. Ken Collins
Chief of Police
City of Maplewood
1830 E. County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Mr. Collins:
In regard to the attached affidavit releasing my name from the liquor license
for Esteban's Restaurant which is located at 3069 White Bear Avenue,
Maplewood, MN. I wish to retract the attached affidavit dated October 18, 1988
due to the fact that I am still employed by Esteban's. During my 10 plus
years of employment with Esteban's I earned (5) weeks of vacation which began
10/24/88 and terminates 11/28/88. I had mutually agreed with Esteban's to
end my employment after my vacation period ended on 11/28/88. However,
due to the City of Maplewood's liquor license regulations I agree to extend
my employment beyond 11/28/88 if necessary to allow for proper liquor
license transfer procedures.
DATED: /14 /e8
DONALD WAYNE TRITCH
`6s'"telbawn CS
INTERNATIONAL, INC. ,M
4208 Park Glen Road
St. Louis Park, MN 55416'
(612) 920 -1435
October 18, 1988
Ms. Lucille E. Aurelius
City Clerk
City of Maplewood
1830 E. County Road B
Maplewood,.MN 55109
Dear Mr. Aurelius:
I, Donald Wayne Tritch, hereby release my name from the
liquor license for Esteban's Restaurant, which is located
at 3069 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood, MN 55109
DATED :
DONALD WAYNE TRITCH
b
`Es'telbAW'5
INTERNATIONAL, INC. TM
4208 Park Olen Road
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
(612) 920-1435
November 7, 1988
Lucille E. Aurelius
City Clerk
City of Maplewood
1830 E.,County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Ms. Aurelius:
I, Kenneth Lee Kufahl, do not hold any interest in
any other liquor establishments.
7&/ \�; � �lz
Kenfieth Lee Kufkhf
DATED: 0 0IV(;db
i
6 4'
17.127/910
L� RIVERSIDE BANK 24978
INTERNATIONAL. INC. Tm MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA
903 Mnlquetic Avenue South DAZE
Minneapolis, MN 55402 11/7/88 1 CHIECKAMOUA
Inly; Three . hundred seventy five °and 00/100 - - --
IAY TO City of Maplewood
)RD EROF ` 1830 E. County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
V024978v 1:0 9 100 1 2 701: LSO LO1 811'
e '-d -, (I 7636
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CITY CLERK No. C 7636
1530 E. COUNTY RD. B. MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109
RECEIVED OF r- %.
DATE
utSCRIPTION
PERM /I,IC.
AMOUNT
FUND
OBJECT.
PROD.
DIV.
CHECK E] CASH E]
* * ** *375.00 *41
I r Muclymuoy
j
! ' AGENDA REPORT
To: City Manager Michael McGuire
From: <Chief of Police Kenneth V. Collinsjf'd<_
Subject: Bids For Used City Vehicles
Date: November 21, 1988
f / 9
Action by Council:
Yndorsed — - -
Modiiied.
Raj eated -- ---
Introduction
On November 21, 1988, at 1:00 p.m., bids were opened for used City vehicles
that were advertised in the Dispatch - Pioneer Press on Sunday, November 6,
1988.
Background
Past practice has been that all bids in excess of $1,000 be submitted to
the City Council for approval.
Recommendation
The following is a list of vehicles with bids in excess of $1,000:
1982 Ford LTD $1,244.00
1985 Ford LTD Crown Victoria $1,876.00
1987 Chevrolet Caprice Station Wagon $4,501.00
We,recommend that the high bid be accepted.
KVC:js
cc Captain Nelson
Vehicle File
0
N
J
V
W IM
W
U '
. r
J N
m
LLI
� z
n
L
v
M
F-
`z_
N
H
Z
I
0
0
0
�
0
v
\
N
1
0
`
0
ol
h
o
4
h
o
k
Q
0
(\
o
L
v
M
F-
`z_
N
H
Z
I
i�
AGENDA ITEM F -
Action by Council:
MEMORANDUM Endorsed
Modified_
T0: City Manager Rejected
'FROM: Assistant City Engineer Date
SUBJECT: Walter Street, Frost Avenue to Fenton Avenue,
Project-84-14- Hearing
DATE: November 22, 19BB
Enclosed is a figure from the March 25, 1985 public hearing
mailing list boot: that identifies the assessable front footage
involved with the proposed project. It should be noted that
assessment of the 120 F.F. of side lot frontage of Lots 18, 19,
and 20 of Block 3, Kavanagh & Dawsons Addition on the northeast
corner of Walter Street right of way and Fenton Avenue may not be
entirely sustainable. Although this assessment would be in
accord with the defacto assessment policy of the city as
established by precedent, the recent experience with successful
assessment objections for similar corner lots on Cope Avenue,
Project 85 -26, raises the question of the validity of the
proposed assessment for this parcel. An appraisal to resolve
this questions has not been done at this point. It is possible
that if the project is ordered, then the city may have to supply
funds to supplement the recoverable assessment from this corner
lot.
A potential alternative to the construction of proposed Walter
Street, which does not serve a public purpose other than access
to the existing residence at 1096 Frost Avenue, may be the
upgrading of the existing driveway to provide acceptable
emergency vehicle access. It is estimated that the driveway
could be upgraded to provide acceptable emergency vehicle access
by placement of aggregate base material upon the existing
driveway. This work could be done by city maintenance forces at
a cost of less than $1000.00.
Transmitted herewith are copies of the public hearing mailing
list. A resolution to order preparation of plans and
specification is attached.
jw
Attachments
�� _ • /l��s E6sE0 f:3
� c.
--
/
I—
o
It a
CL
11 L h� 1 ' — a 14 ' t
+d$ - /ldFf i --
1 Zlrb //x 1 S Ic
w �
2 —
P »PSP u 1�� Y N N ♦de ; Q i0 1 1 1 •Lo
4G :e Y
10' 1 0
4
FENTON --
L 2
, 11
o._ , 9 Y
4
o. u 1 T
i. 141 7 • f " / ' —_ -- 7� I • — �3+V
IS , G 7' '•' — 1 S IG
� 942 ')
1
t J
4050 v, r., u • —y` ww 2 ` L 11, 1 1 IS eI y I
iA
v►rfc, e ^ 1 1 ' GO
' :IV 11_ • J 1
" °RIPLEY
to
Is
O X 11 Ap
ti
y
IMP. 84 -14 Walter Street 3/8/85
Projected Assessment Frontage
M
RESOLUTION
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING;
WHEREAS, after due notice of public hearing on the
construction of street and utilities on Walter Street, Frost
Avenue to Fenton Avenue, City Project 84 -14, a hearing on said
improvement in accordance with the notice duly given wras duly
held on November 28, 1988, and the council has heard all persons
desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the
same;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows:
1. That it is advisable, expedient and necessary that the
City of Maplewood construct street and utilities qn Walter
Street, Frost Avenue to Fenton Avenue, City Project 84 -14, as
described in the notice of hearing thereof, and orders the same
to be made.
2. The city engineer is designated engineer for this
improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and
specifications for the making of said improvement.
/r - J
by Council:,
MEMORANDUM
TO; City City Manager Modi.fi_ed_
FROM: Director of Community Development ge3ecte
SUBJECT: Code Amendment: Planning Fees
DATE: October 17, 1988 Date
The City Council approved increases in license /permit fees and
service charges on October 17. Council also gave first reading
to the attached code amendment raising planning fees. These
increases have been planned for in the 1989 budget.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the attached ordinance.
Attachment:
Code amendment
GO /PLANFEES
ORDINANCE NO.
PLANNING FEES
Section 1. Section 36 -26 of the Zoning Code of the City'of Maplewood is hereby amended
as follows:
Section 36 -26. Fees. The application fees
hall required:
Zone Change
Conditional Use Permit
Planned Unit Development
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Variances:
R -1
All other districts
Vacations
Lot Divisions
Preliminary Plat
Final Plat
Home Occupation Permit
$250
165
300
165
50
75
53
35 for each lot created
300
50
47 for the initial permit and
19 for an annual renewal
Section 2. Section 36 -258 of the sign code is amended as follows:
Section 36 -258. Fees.
(1) A sign erection permit fee (except for billboards) shall be paid
in accordance with the following schedule:
Square Feet
Fee
1 - 10
S 13
11 - 25
18
26 - 50
29
51 - 100
70
Over 100
128
(2) The
ve square feet, plus $ 55 for each additional 1 square first
foot.
five
(3) The annual license fee for billboards shall be $240.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect on January 1, 1989.
Passed by the Maplewood City Council on
Attest: Mayor
Ayes- -
Nays--
Clerk
Zone Change
Conditional
Planned Unit Development
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Variances:
R -1
All Other Districts
Vacations
Lot Divisions (Fee per lot created)
Preliminary Plat
Final Plat
Sign Erection Permit:
1 - 10 Sq. Ft.
11 - 25
26 -50
51 - 100
Over 100
Billboard Erection Permit:
Each Additional Sq. Ft.
Billboard License
Code Amendment
Proposed
1987
1Fee
Fee
im
$150*
$157*
$250 **
150*
157*
165*
150*
157*
300 **
150*
157*
165*
43*
45*
50 **
85*
89*
75 **
48*
50*
53*
32
33
35
150
157
300 * **
32
33
50 * **
11
12
13
16
17
18
27
28
29
64
67
70
117
122
128
9
10
11
$.50
$.52
$.55
219
229
240
165
* Plus $12 for each affected property to pay for the County's filing fee
for resolutions.
** *Less than the average fee other cities charge. Based on average time in
Maplewood to process a final plat.
/
Planning Commission
Minutes 11~^7~BB
-5-
2) se from equipment 'permitted before 8
a" � �m or after 4 p"m° No tivity is permitted
on Skurdays, Sundays or,Molidays"
3) Soil ma be tracked onto Cypress
Street o C"
4) Submit a $ er of credit and a
mineral extr agreement to the City
Engineer, as ted Section 36-412 of City
code" i by
�
5)
Submit a ch u
grading an grave�
sit schedu
cont l xtractio
final ding,
Commissioner Slettsh seconded
Commi ischer
reso] Ution Xo rezone
the north from F, fa
Commi oner Sletten
for the duration of all
extraction activity on this
shall address erosion
� rehabilitation, rough and
~-Axdahl , Barrett,
C inal, Dempsey, Fiola
Fi her, Larson, Sigmundik
Sl��ten
moved the Planning n approve the
this site WON p adjoining to
°m residence to R-1, e dwelling.
seconded Ayes- ~ ;! i iirson, l, Barrett,
Cardin empsey, Fiola
Fisch e Sigmundik
Sletten
B. Code Amendment: Planning Fees
_
Commissioner Sletten moved the Planning Commission recommend
approval of the ordinance increasing planning fees.
Commissioner Cardinal seconded Ayes--Axdahl , Barrett,
Cardinal, Dempsey, Fiola,
Fischer, Larson, Sigmundik,
Sletten
C. Public ement
The staff repo
commissioners" `�//
oject: Holloway Avenue
sented and discussed with the
��
Bob Engwer 2649/ 19t ue, North St" Paul , the originator of
the petition fol the syeet improvement, said he would like to
see the improvement profect approved so this property can be
developed"
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
Aot1ou by Onnuoll:
TO: City 1v1ana9er \
FROM: Assistant City Engineer Eodorood_~___~-
SUBJECT: Holloway Avenue, Beebe Road to Furness Street Modified—__
Project 87-14--Public Hearing Dejaotod~~.°.~~.,
DATE: November 22, 1988 Date-----
The supplemental report to the feasibility study for the subject
project did not address the costs of sidewalk. On a municipal
state aid project such as Holloway Avenue, the cost of sidewalk
is entirely eligible for MSA funding. If sidewalk is desired to
be constructed with roadway improvements meeting MSA standards
then the local share and financing is unaffected. The
construction of a five-foot wide walk on one side would add an
estimated $6,000 to the construction cost, which would be funded
through MSA"
For reference, copies of the supplemental report the
feasibility study and the staff report of October 19, 1988 are
attached" A resolution ordering the preparation of plans and
specifications is attached" The mailing list book is transmitted
herewith"
Jc
Attachments
W O- W ,
ENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS 0 PLANNERS
October 11, 1988
RE: MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
PROPOSED MAPLEWOOD
NORTH ST. PAUL
HOLLOWAY AVENUE STREET
IMPROVEMENTS
SEH FILE NO. 88051
Mr. Bruce Irish
Assistant City Engineer
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Dear Mr. Irish:
In accordance with your authorization, we have prepared this
supplemental report for Holloway Avenue between Beebe Road and
Furness Street. This supplemental report will summarize the
previous report dated April 25, 1988 and consider only the
improvements to the non - existing street between Beebe Road and
Furness Street. Drawing No. 1 illustrates the proposed
improvements anticipated for this portion of Holloway Avenue.
Sanitary sewer exists along Holloway Avenue and is jointly used
with North St. Paul. There are no sanitary sewer services
between Beebe Road and Furness Street. Therefore, sanitary sewer
services will have to be installed and it is assumed that each
city will pay for its own services.
Watermain and water services are required between Beebe Road and
Furness Street. Both Maplewood's and North St. Paul's water
systems are proposed to be looped and services provided. An 8
inch watermain is proposed for Maplewood and a 6 inch watermain
is proposed for North St. Paul. It is assumed that each city
will pay for its own watermain improvements.
Storm sewer is proposed to be extended from Beebe Road to Furness
Street. The cost apportionment for storm drainage is based on
the run off acre (CA) ratio method.
222 EAST LITTLE CANADA ROAD, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612484-0272
SHORT ELLIOTT ST PAUL, CHIPPrWA FALLS,
HENDRICKSON INC. MINNESOTA WISCONSIN
Mr. Bruce Irish
October 11, 1988
Page #2
This one block of Holloway Avenue is proposed to be constructed
to MSA Standards. Also, shifting the centerline of Furness
Street westerly is required to align it with the centerline of
6th Street. The intersection of Furness Street and Holloway
Avenue will have to be lowered to meet minimum sight distance
standards and to provide easier access to the lower lying
properties to the north. Due to this adjustment, a portion of
6th Street will have to be reconstructed.
An additional..33 feet of .right -of -way is required between Beebe
Road and Furness Street to provide the needed 66 feet of right of
way. Also realignment of Furness Street will require an
additional easement. (200' x 80')
If the connnection between Beebe Road and Furness Street is
constructed to a 44 foot width, only two blocks of Holloway
Avenue would remain narrower than the MSA Standard width for
parking on both sides. Because of the relatively low traffic
volumes projected, it does not appear that the narrow section of
Holloway Avenue will cause any traffic flow problems. However,
if all the residents were to park their vehicles on the street,
through traffic appoaching each other may have difficulty
passing. If this situation occured, the City may have to
restrict parking to one side of the street.
The following table lists the total estimated cost and cost
participation:
SUMMARY OF ESTIMATES OF COST
WITH RAMSEY COUNTY PARTICIPATION
Holloway Avenue- Beebe Road- Furness Street
Maplewood North St. Paul Ramsey Co. Total
Street $47,570
Watermain & Serv. 24,770
Sanitary Sewer Serv. 2,560
Storm Sewer 7,860
Total $82,760
$47,570 $44,860 $140,000
26,510 0 51,280
9,250 0 11,810
0 18,340 26,200
$83,330 $63,200 $229,290
The estimates include estimated construction costs plus 10
percent for contingencies and 32 percent for indirect costs.
Easement costs have not been included.
Mr. Bruce Irish
Ocotber 11, 1988
Page #3
Ramsey County has stated that they will accept Holloway Avenue,
between North St. Paul Road and McKnight Road as a county road
upon completion of the new construction and participate in the
construction costs as previously outlined in the April 25, 1988
report. However, it has not been determined whether the County
will participate in the costs for only the one block section of
Holloway Avenue described in this report. The City should direct
a letter to the Ramsey County Engineer asking for cost sharing.
The following table lists the cost participation without Ramsey
County participation.
SUMMARY OF ESTIMATES OF COST
WITHOUT RAMSEY COUNTY PARTICIPATION
Holloway Avenue- Beebe Road Furness Street
The estimates include estimated construction costs plus 10
percent for contingencies and 32 percent for indirect costs.
Easement costs have not been included.
Maplewood
North St. Paul
Total
Street
$70,000
$70,000
$140,000
Watermain & Serv.
24,770
26,510
51,280
Sanitary Sewer Serv.
2,560
9,250
11,180
Storm Sewer
17,030
9,170
26,200
Total
$114,360
$114,930
$229,290
The estimates include estimated construction costs plus 10
percent for contingencies and 32 percent for indirect costs.
Easement costs have not been included.
I .
Mr. Bruce Irish
October 11, 1988
Page #4
Holloway Avenue is designated as a MSA Street in both cities.
The MSA participation is based on the assumptions that 100
percent of the street construction costs and 50 percent of the
storm sewer related construction costs are eligible. The
estimate of -cost eligible for MSA funding is listed on the
following table.
ESTIMATE OF COST ELIGIBLE FOR MSA PARTICIPATION
Financing and cost recovery information relating to these
projects needs to prepared by each city.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Kenneth R. Meister, P.E.
KRM /cmb
Maplewood
No. St. Paul
Total
Street
$53,025
$53,0'5
$106,050
Storm Drainage
6,450
3,475
9,925
Subtotal
59,475
56,500
115,975
18% Engineering
10,705
10,170
20,875
(Maximum Eligibility)
Total
$70,180
$66,,670
$136,850
Financing and cost recovery information relating to these
projects needs to prepared by each city.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Kenneth R. Meister, P.E.
KRM /cmb
r z
I W rc
S W p o
'Oa w 1H INN�W �' p
0: Z o =
. Z 0 Z o i y
ro
� 00 m N u
~ Y a
O Q
cc J _
3 > a
O m ¢ Q O N
J O w a
y �Q �-1 O
I- a
a <
u m OI W = W y y
N F- -j
0 o O 0.
O Q
¢
'1S 19 0.
W
� w
D a
Z Do
a
W m
ro
a N
00 m is S3Nanj
m .D I�
pp ��7ir '1S Hl 9 z -
l�J °o$ Nw 0 t. R 1
m z
wg
O f^° •� wrc i O
OR
.1 0
mg
, 'Oa -----
'1S H1L izi ^____________ w rc w
wl N W
y 3 W
X61 w� f w d w O
wl
- I z w
z w 31n wtt
LnI
iii o :. Ww o00�'
yy Q W W W N W W
0 0 0 N N N
00
0
a
NO / , ip 11 u a 1 a a a a
ul
tAi
b
oa0 I I m
s
\ I
AGENDA ITEM I - 3
AGENDA REPORT
TOs City Manager
FROM- Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Holloway Avenue, Beebe to Furness, Project 87 -14
Schedule Public Hearing
DATES October 19, 1988
INTRODUCTION
Action by Ccu^c
Modified—_
Rejected _.
Date
The, feasibility study presented at the previous public hearing
for this project proposed construction of roadway with utilities
in the undeveloped right -of -way between Beebe and Furness
together with reconstruction of the existing roadway from Furness
to McKnight Road. The proposed public improvement was denied at
the public hearing. Subsequently, the council directed the
engineering department to evaluate the feasibility of
constructing the undeveloped segment from Beebe to Furness only
without reconstruction of the existing roadway from Furness to
McKnight Road. A supplemental report is enclosed which reviews
the feasibility..6f this proposal. A resolution is attached which
schedules a public hearing.
BACKGROUND
The supplemental report gives a cost breakdown as to whether or
not Ramsey County participates in the funding of the one block
segment from Beebe to Furness. From discussions with Ramsey
County Public Works Department staff, participation in the costs
of a one block segment by Ramsey County would not be allowed
under the county board's previous decision to participate in the
construction and reconstruction from Beebe to McKnight Road. A
new decision by the county board would be required to determine
if Ramsey County will participate in the one block segment
construction proposed. Whether or not Ramsey County
participates, then Maplewood's share of street construction and
storm sewer costs can be completely financed by MSA funds and
assessment to the abutting property within Maplewood at the
quasi- standard rate of $36.50/FF for collector streets on MSA
routes. Direct assessment for water main costs is proposed at
approximately $46.60 /FF.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that a public hearing be schedule as set forth
in the attached resolution.
jc
I N
RESOLUTION
ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has
been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference
to the improvement of Holloway Avenue, Beebe to Furness, City
Project e7-14 by construction of a bituminous roadway with
concrete curb and gutter and utilities, and
WHEREAS, the said city engineer has prepared the aforesaid
report for the improvement herein described:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows:
1. The report of the city engineer advising this council
that the proposed improvement on Holloway Avenue, Beebe to
Furness, City Project 87 -14, by construction of a bituminous
roadway with concrete curb and gutter and utilities is feasible
and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received.
2. The council will consider the aforesaid improvement in
accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited
property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement
according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the
improvement of $229,290.
3. A public hearing will be held in the council chambers
of the city hall at 1830 East County Road B on Monday, the 2Bth
day of November, 19B8, at 7120 p.m. to consider said improvement.
The city clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said
hearing and improvement as required by law.
RESOLUTION
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING
'
WHEREAS, after due notice of public hearing on the
construction of street with concrete curb and gutter and
utilities on Holloway Avenue, Beebe Road to Furness Street, City
Project 87~14, a hearing on said improvement in accordance with
the notice duly given was duly held on November 28, 1988, and the
desiring t b council has heard all persons o e heard on the matter e
and has fully considered the same;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows:
1° That it 's advisable, expedient and necessary that the
City of Maplewood , ,onstruct street with concrete curb and gutter
and utilities on Holloway Avenue, Beebe Road to Furness Street,
City Project 87-14, as described in the notice of hearing
thereof, and orders the same to be made.
2. The city engineer is designated engineer for this
improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and
specifications for the making of said improvement"
F,3
� �
�, �
�
&c. ou � /1 h Council:
'
� ^
tudorso0-...-_'~.-
MEMORANDUM
&odtf1v0.~~_._-~
Dejontod_._.-~~~~~
O: City Manager ,� Dut
FROM: Associate Planner-Johnson
SUBJECT: Public Improve'nent~Holloway Avenue
LOCATION: Between Furness St" and Beebe Road
DATE: October 31, 1988
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
This improvement project
Avenue, water main, storm
Road and Furness Gtreet^
to the feasibility study.
BACKGROUND
consists of the construction of Holloway
sewer and sanitary sewer between Beebe
(Refer to the drawing that is attached
1" State law requires the Planning Commission to review all
capital improvement projects for consistency with the
comprehensive plan.
2^ Council considered this project as part of a larger improve-
ment on May 23° That project was rejected because of
neighborhood opposition to the proposed reconstruction of
Holloway Avenue to 44 feet of width between Furness Street and
McKnight Road. On August 22, Council considered the vacation of
Holloway Avenue between Beebe Road and Furness Street (the
subject of this . Council ordered this amended project
and rejected the street vacation request"
DISCUSSION
The North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale school district supports
this street improvement. (Refer to their letter on page 4")
They are also requesting that consideration be given to the
inclusion of a sidewalk.
A sidewalk should be included in this project to be consistent
with the City's transportation plan" The plan calls for
sidewalks to be constructed along collector streets, such as
Holloway Avenue, within one-half mile of schools.' This project
is within one-half mile of Webster Elementary school. According
to Brian Buchmeyer, the business agent for the school district,
construction of a sidewalk between Beebe Road and Furness Street
would save the school district $15,000 each year in busing costs"
RECOMMENDATION
1" Make a finding that the proposed street and sanitary sewer
improvements are consistent with the comprehensive plan.
2" Make a finding that a sidewalk must be included in the
project, between Beebe and Furness Roads, to be consistent with
the transportation element of the comprehensive plan"
3" Make a finding that the proposed drainage and water main
improvements are not part of the comprehensive plan and,
therefore, are not inconsistent with the comprehensive plan.
�
REFERENCE
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
State law requires that the Planning Commission review all public
capital improvement projects within the City" Section 462,356 of
state law states that:
"After a comprehensive municipal plan or section thereof has been
recommended by the planning agency and a copy filed with the
governing body, no publicly-owned interest in real property
within the municipality shall be acquired or disposed of, nor
shall any capital improvement be authorized by the municipality
or special district of agency thereof or any other political
subdivision having jurisdiction within the municipality until
after the planning agency has reviewed the proposed acquisition,
disposal, or capital improvement and reported in writing to the
governing body or other special district or agency of political
subdivision concerned, its findings as to compliance of the
proposed acquisition, disposal or improvement with the
comprehensive municipal plan""
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS
'
1" Holloway Avenue is designated as a major collector street
(page 5 ), Holloway Avenue west of this project and east of
McKnight Road is 44 to 46 feet wide. This project calls for a
width of 44 feet, which is consistent with the designation of a
major collector street.
2. The City's transportation plan is part of the comprehensive
plan. On page B2 a statement is made that "sidewalks should be
constructed along arterial and collector streets within one-half
mile of each school." This policy was adopted to coordinate the
City/5 sidewalk policy with the school district's walking
distance policy. The school district now provides bus
transportation to students that live one mile or farther from
their school, except that elementary children are not permitted
to walk more than one-half mile along public streets without a
sidewalk and they cannot cross a "designated hazardous street.''
3" A sidewalk exists on the south side of Holloway Avenue, east
of McKnight Road" That sidewalk was constructed in 1984"
1" Relocation of the Furness Street intersection will result in
the opportunity to vacate excess right-of-way" ARefer to the
drawing in the feasibility study.) An easement must, however, be
retained for/ existing sewer and water lines over any right-of-way
to be vacated. The property owner to the east could then
subdivide into three rather than two lots. This lot is currently
undeveloped.
3
2° The Ramsey County Board supports the
street. In 1983, they passed a resolution
as a county road, once constructed°
NORTH ST. PAUL
construction of this
to accept this street
The City of North St. Paul owns property north of the proposed
street" They want the street constructed to make reasonable use
of their property.
.
mb\rjhollow
Attachments:
1" Hillside Neighborhood Land Use Plan
2. Property Line/Zoning Map
3. Letter form the School District
4. Feasibility Report
4
��# .M E ^ � .T i� D- Ni lM2a Il Nlro zl zaM xa xe a
w
W p � j 1 NURII IO o a >i p
Y w «, Il ro zl x] zs ze ze
W M U•
• r In.,.v e.�g M1 '•
I
�P GOWER N... - - -„
Not improved WO
c o t
., .,p (N du �y�yj W
tl
».aae (.)R3
>(,°, Undeveloped
4 Apartment!
b F e.
Y
\ V
\ �;ze R1
aw
N Nl z Y
R 3 --
0
z
a Gj
1
Par «.
�u
IMEPLNO[NT 6UIOOL OISIPICT Nq >x2 � ry „ �' ryl 0
w
'29 r PrLx s
N' ,• ^
1Orl, ,` El O
.0 Pe 1!✓ 3
1
s • I
P 6.IG
PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP
6
Attachment 2
4
41 a lt
l
°1
11 e4 ^ >4•
A z i i
Right —of —way in North
St.
Paul ::
r
iul
11 � Iz
1)
N
1 u n le
(rl !•4 !•
tW n. 00
N M
1 !M
(
M
r•a p•)
�
7
'P
Y 16
0 e•) Ilq
F
0
(+I
0
, e')
� (W
LJ
G1
r� N>� ➢_I
C•) y/'
l
fl rw 'a—
Nr
4
m
Iz
np
•
' l M
li
.w F•
'n L-
Z
N)
e e
to ' g o . .
i
�
ue »
n•.o I
r,n
rw
fFp
PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP
6
Attachment 2
4
=l'me Webster
Fire and Paramedic ,,iementary `
school }
from Frost Avenue f ;
civil i+ t major
<.
r Rm I
Maplewood Middle
P
School
d —.
�� Rm t
_ flm
,C E c .
S _
OS -
—
major arteria l ,
LSC i °S V
y �. b
�--a�
nD
C
Hillside
NEIGHBORNOOD LAID USE PLAN
5
0 N
Attachment 1
NORTH ST. PAUL — MAPLEWOOD — OAKDALE SCHOOLS s' Mno,F HOO
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 622
(612)770 -4603 2055 East Larpenteur Avenue g
Maplewood, MN 55109
yOO aiata���
April 27, 1988
The Honorable John Greavu
Mayor, City of Maplewood
City Hall.
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN. 55109
Dear Mayor Greavu:
On behalf of North St. Paul — Maplewood — Oakdale Schools I would
like to express our support for the continuation of Holloway
Avenue from Beebe Road to Sixth Street.
Our interest in this continuation is one of further cost savings
to our taxpayers'. With the completion of that street, those
children from the apartments of Beebe Road will have safe direct
walking access to Webster School, thereby eliminating the need
for a bus. The cost savings to taxpayers is estimated at $15,000
per year. We ask that the Planning Commission and City Council
in their deliberations consider this need and honor the
developers request.
In addition, we would like you to consider a sidewalk along that
street to provide safe walking access to our students and other
pedestrians.
I
Sincerely,
r_
Brian C. Buchmayer
Director of Business Affairs
cc: Mike McGuire, City Administrator
.. ♦Geoff Olson, City Planner
Richard St. Germain, Superintendent
School Board, ISD 622
Ron Parrucci, Dir. Operations
7
Attachment 3
II
f�
r
my mvv v � m "•
A 0 0 0
T T m L 9
O O
O O O
N N N N N N pog
00 N m m m O Ei
m o 0 o p-
.0 e �
o-
n m 8
o m m z N
m
( {l1 u
m n F
� m
s
O �
DA
rz
zm
ZN
3
O i.+
u'u
O
I
WO
$W
O
�O
1
T
8o
3
` A
O v
Z> > u.
J " -.
o
D
x�mgE
N
MO
�6
a
W
m
`2
p
F g
O
q
r
K?m e
m
I-
m
=
m
O D
r
m
i
m
N
2
*
D
c
r
Z
m
m
0 o
W
m p
D O
"
0 m
m o
o W
?
o Z
°i
91 m
O
z
1
M
z
O 1
S�
p
m s
O7
9 y
J
Z
• p
N D
C
r
s
O �
DA
rz
zm
ZN
3
O i.+
u'u
O
I
WO
$W
O
�O
T
8o
0
bmo
o
o
$o
TH S
MO
�6
W
p �
O
o
r
Z
UI
�`
5T
ST
HOWAR ST.
� o
A
G O A
r
m
o z
aRD
m m
0 1
P arinirig Gomm ission
Minutes 11 -7 -SB
2)
-5•-
N . noise from equipment is permitted before S
a or after 4 p.m. No activity is permitted
on turdays, Sundays or holidays.
3) Soil terial shall not be tracked onto Cypress
Street r County Road C.
4) Submit a x,000 letter of r_r it and a signed
mineral extraction agreemen to the City
Engineer, Is directed by ction 36 -412 of City
code.
5) Submit a sche ule for he duration of all
grading and gr J el e .raction activity on this
site. This sc dul shall address erosion
control, e>;trac i , rehabilitation, rough and
final grading.
Commissioner Sletten /ed Ayes-- A:;dahl, Barrett,
Cardinal, Dempsey, Fiola,
Fischer, Larson, Sigmundik,
'1 etteri
Commissioner.Fischer Planning Commission approve the
resolu tion to rezone and th property adjoining to
the north from F, far ce to R 1, single dwelling.
Commissioner Slett n seconded Aye_-- A>edahl, Barrett,
Card nal, Dempsey, Fiola,
Fisch r, Larson, Sigmundik,
Slett n
B. Code A( Z: Planning Fees
Commissio er Sletten moved the Planning Com ission recommend
approval of the ordinance increasing planni g fees.
Commi signer Cardinal seconded Ayes --AxdK!son, , Barrett,
Cardinal, mpsey, Fiola,
Fischer, Sigmundik,
Sletten
C. Public Improvement Project: Holloway Avenue
The staff report was presented and discussed with the
commissioners.
Bob Engwer, 2640 19th Avenue, North St. Paul, the originator of
the petition for the street improvement, said he would like to
see the improvement project approved so this property can be
developed.
Planning Commission -b-
Minutes 11 -7 -88
A commissioner said this improvement would provide school
children the connecting link for safe walking access to school.
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend
the City Council :
I. Make a finding that the proposed street and sanitary sewer
improvements are consistent with the comprehensive plan.
2. Make a finding that a sidewalk must be included in the
project, between Beebe Road and Furness Street, to bra
consistent with the transportation element of the
comprehensive plan.
3.' Mike a finding that the proposed drainage and water main
improvements are not part of the comprehensive plan and,
therefore, are not consistent with the comprehensive plan.
Commissioner Larson seconded Ayes-- Axdahl, Barrett,
Cardinal, Dempsey, Fiala,
Fischer, Larson, Sigmundik,
Sletten
D. Planning Commission 1988 Annual Report
Secretary Olson presented the staff report and discussed the
Planning Commission annual report format with the
commissioners. ,
IX. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
X. COMMISSION PRESENTATION'S
A. Council Meeting: October 24, 1988
D. Representative for the November 14, 1988, Council Meeting:
Michael Ayers
C. The commissioners discussed the Metropolitan Council's
report on housing and service needs for elderly and
.disabled in the community.
XI. STAFF PRESENTATIONS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 9:58 p.m.
�
�
. `
i
MEMORANDUM
TO:
City Manager
FROM:
Associate Planner-Johnson
SUBJECT:
Preliminary Plat and Rezoning
LOCATION:
Cypress Street
APPLICANT/OWNER:
Goff Homes, Inc..
PROJECT TITLE:
Knollwood Circle
DATE:
November 3, 1980
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
�� �
F_ � �
&:tiou ^, C` �
Eudn^.. ---'
(F to R_14odif1e0_--_--~
Raj outad-
Dot
1° The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval for a
fourteen-lot, single-dwelling development. (Refer to the map on
page g")
2^ City staff is proposing the rezoning of this area from F, farm
to R-1, single dwelling to eliminate any farm-related nuisance
activity.
3. 20,000 cubic yards of dirt would be removed from the site"
With three trucks hauling eight hours a day, five days per week,
the requested sand and gravel extraction can be completed in
approximately 20 days" With two trucks, the hauling would take
about 30 days" The number of trucks is dependent upon the size
of the loader that is available" The proposed pace translates
into six trips from the site each hour for two trucks, and nine
trips each hour if three trucks are used" The north 180+ feet of
Cypress Street is the only local street along the haul r
within the City of Maplewood" The remainder of the route (County
Road C and Highway 61) is designated for truck traffic. The
proposed B to 4 work-day should also minimize the impact on the
neighbors"
BACKGROUND
1. In 1986 the applicant was issued a grading permit to remove
sand and gravel and to rough-grade this site. Council revoked
this grading permit last fall in response to neighborhood
complaints that the applicant was not adequately controlling the
dust, truck traffic, or noise.
2" Previous mining activity has resulted in a steep escarpment
that runs north/south through the site. This escarpment must be
removed to prepare the site for development, eliminate the
possibility of injury to residents, and control soil erosion"
DISCUSSION
The main concern with this project has been the applicant's past
performance in grading the site. Staff feels that requiring
compliance with the mining ordinance, restricting hours of
operation, a $5,000 letter of credit, and increased staff
monitoring of the .grading should resolve most of the past
problems. The proposed plat is consistent with the land use
plan, zoning and platting codes.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve the P.`.nollwood Circle preliminary plat, subject to the
following conditions:
a. The following conditions must be met before final plat
approval:
1) City staff approval of final grading, erosion
control, utility, drainage, street and tree
preservation plans. The storm sewer plan shall
address the localized flooding problem that occurs in
the vicinity of proposed lot one.
2) The development shall comply with the tree
preservation requirements of the Environmental
Protection Ordinance. At least 65 existing or newly
planted trees shall be on the site when construction is
complete.
3) Submit a signed developer's agreement with the
required surety for all required public improvements.
4) Correct the legal description.
b. Any grading or extraction of sand or gravel must comply
the'City's mineral and soil excavations and extractions
ordinance (Chapter 36 Article IV), with the following
exceptions and additions:
1) Site grading within thirty feet of an adjoining
property line shalt not commence until all of the sand
and gravel excavation activity has ceased, as
determined by the City engineer, except that no grading
or excavation shall be permitted within thirty feet of
the west property line.
2) No noise from equipment is permitted before S a.m.
or after 4 p.m. No activity is permitted on
Saturdays, Sundays or holidays.
3) Soil material shall not be tracked onto Cypress
Street or County Road C.
N
4> Submit a $5,000 letter of credit and a signed
mineral extraction agreement to the city engineer, as
directed by Section 36^^412 of city code.
5) Submit a schedule for the duration of all grading
and gravel extraction activity on this site" This
schedule shall address erosion control extraction,
,
rehabilitation, rough and final grading,
2. Approval of the resolution on page 15 to rezone this site
and the property adjoining to the north from F, farm residence to
R-1, single dwelling.
(At least four votes in favor are needed for approval")
3
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Staff surveyed 57 persons who own property that is located within
350 feet of this property. Of the twelve responses, four are in
favor, one is conditionally in favor, two had no comment and
twelve are opposed"
The person conditionally in favor (Forest Street) wants: (1) the
final surface drainage for the new properties not to cause
drainage problems for existing homes., (2) to have the homes to be
built to be of such quality so as to not negatively effect the
value of existing homes and (3) save as many trees that border
the property as possible but "I know this may not be possible."
Staff reply: The City has an obligation to insure that the
drainage from this site will not cause a problem for adjoining
owners. The City cannot regulate the value or design of single
dwellings other than to require a minimum floor area. Regarding
concern Number Three, a condition of approval will be to require
a tree preservation plan that complies with the City's
environmental protection ordinance" Trees will not be permitted
to be removed unless deemed necessary for the reasonable use of
the site. Some tree replanting may be necessary, if a large
number of trees must be removed.
Those opposed raised the following concerns. (Also, refer to the
letters on pages 10-12):
1. a" Excessive amount of soil material would be removed"
Increase the grade of the entrance" Development in the
areas shown as Lots 2 and 3 (page 9) should be prohibited or
severely restricted to preserve the steep slope that is
heavily wooded with evergreen trees. I would possibly
accept it if only the east side of the site were to be
developed.
b. I want the area left as is" We bought our home (Forest
Street) because of open grassy and treed areas behind our
home" Destruction of wildlife, pond and natural drainage, I
feel would lessen the attractiveness and, therefore, the
value of our property.
Staff reply: This site is planned for single-dwelling home use.
The City cannot prohibit development unless the property is
purchased by the public. There are no plans to do so" The
drainage pattern in this vicinity is generally the result of a
partially completed 15 to 20 year-old mining operation.
The wetland in the northwest corner of this site is not needed
for drainage purposes" It also provides very little nutrient
assimilation because it has a very small watershed. As such, the
applicant could fill this wetland, but he has chosen to retain a
significant portion of it for aesthetic purposes" The steep
slope does not qualify for preservation under the City's
&
environmental protection ordinance"
2. This site should be accessed directly from County Road C,
rather than from Cypress Street.
Staff reply: The proposed access is preferably from the
perspective of traffic circulation--the fewer intersections along
a collector street, such as County Road C the better" Since the
best street location is the one proposed, the City has no basis
upon which to require the applicant to buy more land to pursue
condemnation of additional property"
3° Excessive traffic on area streets.
Staff reply: The county and City engineers have stated that the
public streets in this area are designed to handle the short-
term truck traffic, as well as the long-term residential traffic
that would result from this development. County Road C is
expected to handle upwards of 7,000 vehicle trips per day" In
1987, the county recorded a traffic count of only 2,000 vehicles.
4. During last spring's rainfall, water did not drain on Palm
Court (west of this site, a quarter mile) v what about a new
project--same problem? How will this project effect our water
table?
Staff reply: The soils in this location drain better than near
Palm Court. This development should not cause an increase in
the water table in this vicinity.
5
REFERENCE
Site Descrintion
Area: 6"5+ acres
Existing land use:
Environmental
undeveloped
This property is the site of former excavation/mining activity.
A steep escarpment runs north/south through the site" The west
boundary is heavily wooded with evergreen trees. Mature
deciduous trees are located along the southeast and north
boundaries. A wetland is located in the northwest portion of the
property. It is not needed as a storm water retention pond, or-
as a nutrient stripping basin" However, the applicant intends to
leave it generally intact for aesthetic purposes"
Comment: The applicant's proposal calls for 61+ five to twelve-
inch diameter trees to be preserved, principally along the west
property line^ Several other four-to-five inch diameter trees/
evergreens are also to be saved.
The developer is obligated to have at least 65 trees on this site
when construction is complete. To count existing trees, they
must be four inches or greater in diameter" Any shortfall must
be made up by planting trees at least 2 1/2 inches in diameter,
PLANNING
The maximum density allowed in the City land use plan is 14
people/net acre" The minimum lot area is 15 square feet"
This proposal has a density of only 10.4 people/net acre. The
lots average 17,133 square feet of area. The average lot area of
adjoining lots in only 12,894 square feet.
jl\rjgoff
ATTACHMENTS
1, Location Map
2. Property Line/Zoning Map
3" Preliminary Plat (8 1/2 x 11)
4" - 6° Letters from Adjoining Owners
7" Applicant's Letter
B. Resolution (Rezoning)
9" Preliminary Plat/Grading Plan
(Separate attachment)
LOCATION MAP
Attachment 1
0 N
•��� Z45 Y.: _ A .3z 1
Ca
2630 ' 1
3S 970 .988 1001'' oq 1 � Q 3.97a.a.
r. OW 2 c.$' •• bSb
2612 a k n •'es$Ee•
3 Lai
,. 261 .1
�.- � h 3}.. ••: @:r off`. ..' ti :K
4
4 X2604® 3 x°'¢k ; ;< }• g^'s ^;v " �` Q o�
g 2596 0 ° � .�:',:.:. �.� 6x�s•��$• �c?:�: -
a
AM-En. 75 ;. {*cv.} #<js:$: <: ;r }4 % # %.•iv >
I 2586 ` `<.:; «: sa ��'} .: }
R � ': ;;iss�? > :. ».y %h`i:; ; 3a .;t3:..v'�t�t.&�,'�?k•r;. 3 I � 3
z a- 2578
i, h:,:$xxr$•3. � six }'.v .c'dE:...$. #';V }: 1
� E /!f s
; so. Sl ' <r 2 •ei•.,S::r sc2:` µ$5r; -' I.
4 I'4
3 2570 #v:fit <> < >: .:•;:;.
$ .? ::::' S'' t2`:; �: v: hY:¢ of4f: 'tR<,4�*..'t:���e•£`•s: >$`»:v$. `� i
' s /il... ? 4....ys`.s:;.,.� �s.:s.SC<
S /< 9S S S .}s.;$.;, >.t $;'. #:$k$•:2 �c: } "` $2,�...f:28::yxs;:i: 2571 I
..11 � 0 Y: ... .4:$.. �` sue. :w,`:..: �'•: {.:
n 9
T I 1 967' cj 16
E I s•��'; CONNOR l A E.
6
10 S ;" I I 14 1 ' I M F 14 ` 1
AA
Ave 3
b
- -�---
• . ' u� ?a0 A• iz g •� .
6 `z F-I a
15 16• _��� �.;
PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP
8
Area to be platted Attachment 2
N
— --- c•-�'����,- 7_���' � --tom.
70 1' q
�.
n � • • N � ` , ��•. ,,,.� :,, • � • / / _ ��
/
Preliminary Plat.
9
Attachment 3
0 N
I object to .thi.a p4opoba2 because
we know what a paabtem we had the tah.t time Band and gnavet were mined 6Aom
.thi.e pnupeA,ty. we had to keep oun daoab and windows ctoeed and eti2t had a
pnobtem with dust and diA,t in ouA homes and had to make many cads to Maptewood
to get .some AetCe6. why weren't we noti.6.ied the tas.t time band and gAavet we Ae
Aemoved? Wa6 a pe4mit granted the tas.t .time?
In the 6utcuce, .i6 homes cute buitt on .th.i6 pnopenty att wateA and dAainage
wi2Y 6tow to ex,6ting ditches and .then to Kohtman lake. This wateA with
.inceude bug and weed kilte&6, sand, .s.i.tt, compost, manure, etc.
Atso, .i6 water. d6 extended to .tkis pAopeAty, how much wilt the devetopeA pay
to o66set what we, ab Ae6.ident6 o6 County Road C, have aeAeady paid? AR.so,
what wilt the change be peA 6Aant 600.t, ptus stub change and useA peAmZt?
The expen6e we had to pay w" due and payable quite dome time be6oAe the
pngjeet was s.taAted.
985 and 988 East County Road C
Attachment 4
10
1. Danger to small children on
playground.
2. Loud trucks with banging
tailgates.
3. Loader makes excessive noise
when stuck.
4. C ontr V actor'_8 paa L_p= f—
ormance indicates disrggard
for tTiis city s laws on
project.
5. Land in question is lakeshed
area.
6. County road load limits
exceeded on loaded trucks.
7. Road used not a hard
surface.
8. Proposed time table
conflicts with recreational
playground and lake home
time.
9. Letter to city engineer
unprofessional, first names
of principals used.
10. Land can be built on as is.
11. Goff Homes builds homes, not
mines.
12. Mines belong in Hibbing.
13. Extreme amounts of dust and
dirt in air.
Attachment 5
2595 Cypress
I object to this project because of destruction to connecting
properties which they care nothing about and have proved it. I
still have damage to my property from the first removed dirt.
They left it very dangerous, not caring about injuries to kids
that may wander in this area. They cause much dust and uncomfort
to the residents. They lie about how they will take care of
problems. The street is bad enough without them wrecking it any
more like they did in 1987. No, I feel as being a taxpayer and
being in this area longer than they have, I don't trust them,
believe them, or care to have the area left to look as rotten as
they left it last time. If they violated the first permit, who
says they can't do it again while we pay for it. If they want us
as homeowners in the Cypress Street area to go along with them,
how about when they are finished with their project to have them
pay to have Cypress blacktopped. We don't have much on Cypress
Street without it costing an arm and leg. No water, no street
light, no fire hydrant, no blacktop, and it takes an act of God
to get a hole patched. Why have some money— making outfit come
and wreck what little we have got? Have them make good with what
they wreck or keep out.
S1'.7i11
12 Attachment 6
45 88
GOFF HOMES
1959 SLOAN PLACE
MAPLEWOOD, MN 55117
612 - 771 -1364
April 5, 1988
Mr. Kenneth Haider
City Engineer
City of Maplewood
1902 East County Rd. B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Mr. Haider:
Goff Homes purpose for the extraction of approximately
twenty thousand yards of material is to bring the existing
property to buildable grade for near future construction.
At this point, it would allow an elevation workable to
install utilities and grade for proper drainage.
Our time table would require 670 to 1,000 yards to be
removed daily. This brings a total of twenty work days,
Monday thru Friday, with no hauling on weekends or holidays.
We must consider one week for clean up and disposing of
debris arz{five days for downtime such as inclement weather
or unforseen circumstances.
From the site entrance, approximately one hundred eighty
feet south of County Road C, the material would be hauled
east on County Road C to Highway 61, north on Highway 61 to
County Road E, west on County Road E to Centerville Road and
south on Centerville Road to a designated site. The ten
mile round trip haul would take approximately thirty to
forty -five minutes.
The drainage, wind and water erosion control will be handled
daily by not leaving sharp slopes or overhanging edges. A
silt fence can be erected back a given distance from any
extreme slope. Site security will be a snow fence set up at
the entrance way daily. Should dust control be needed, a
water unit will be on hand to sprinkle as required.
After we have completed the extraction a mulch and seed
restoration will be put into effect to hold the remaining
material intact. Enclosed Randy, please find the following
documents:
13 Attachment 7
.s, �.. .. ..:... ..... _.. _.. . � .a. ,.... a r .wa..<.. - ✓...x �ti;?mu s r .:...:S.a;u r +`N^: ^. •ai _ ..,., _z..m.>
s
A. Conditional Use application (filled out)
B. Correct legal description
C. Certified abstract listing names
D. Future site plan
E. Grading plan
Upon receiving approval for this mining extraction permit,
we are requesting that we have until October, 1989 to
complete the work.. Should we not have started the
extraction by October, 1989, we will reapply. Once we have
started however, we will complete the extraction in the
manner previously stated.
Thank you Ken, for your consideration and time on this
matter. Should I have inadvertantly forgotten anything,
please give me a call at #771 -1364 and leave a message and I
will get right back to you.
Sincerely,
Bruce J. Hilger
Goff Homes
cc: Patrick Goff
14
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a
city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota
held in the Council chambers in said city on the
; 1988 at 7 p.m
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
regular meeting of the
was duly called and
day of
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F, farm
residence to R-1, single dwelling for the following-described
properties:
1. SUB TO CO RD C AND EX W 247 5/10 FT AND EX E 247 5/10 FT, THE
N 888 8/10 FT OF W 1/2 OF E 1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF SEC 9 TN 29 RN 22°
This property is commonly known as 970 East County Road C.
2" PART OF LOT 1 BLK 2 PETERS ADD LYING N OF A LINE 89"24 FT S
OF MOST NLY COR OF SD LOT & S OF A LINE 145 FT S OF N LINE OF SEC
9 T 29 R 22 & E 247°5 FT OF N 888.8 FT OF W 1/2 OF NE 1/4 OF NW
1/4 LYING S OF FOL DESC LINE; BEG ON WLY LINE OF CYPRESS ST & 145
FT S OF N LINE OF SD SEC, TH W 16"84 FT, TH ANGLE L 40 DEG FOR
95.03 FT, TH NWLY AT RA TO S LINE OF N 145 FT, TH W ON SD LINE TO
W LINE OF E 247.5 FT & THERE TERM ALL IN NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SEC
9 TN 29 RN 22.
3° PART OF LOT 1 BLK 2 PETERS ADD & PART OF W 1/2 OF NE 1/4 OF
NW 1/4 DESC AS BEG ON NL OF SD 1/4 & EL OF SD W 1/2 ALSO BEING WL
OF CYPRESS ST. TH SLY ON SD WL ST TO LINE RUN PAR TO & 145 FT S
OF NL SD NW 1/4 TH W ON SD PAR LINE 16.84 FT TH ANG LEFT 40 DEG
95.03 FT TH NWLY AT RA TO SD SL OF N 145 FT TH E ON SD SL TO PT
100 FT W OF EL OF SD W 1/2 TH N TO NL NW 1/4 TH E TO BEG (SUB-3 TO
RD) IN SEC 9 TN 29 RN 22"
This property is commonly known as 1000 East County Road C.
4" N 145 FT OF W 147"5 FT OF E 247°5 FT OF W 1/2 OF NE 1/4 OF NW
1/4 (SUBJ TO RD) OF SEC 9 TN 29 RN 22"
This property is commonly known as 988 East County Road C.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1" This rezoning was initiated pursuant to Chapter 36, Article
VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances,
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning
Commission on v 1988° The Planning Commission
recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be .
3° The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on
15
Attachment 8
, 1988 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was
published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said
hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written
statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of
the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that
the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following
findings of fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose
and intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract
from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the
neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area
included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and
conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the
logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and
facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection
and schools.
S. Approval would eliminate any farm - related nuisances that may
occur that would be incompatible with this single - dwelling
neighborhood.
Adopted this day of , 1988.
Seconded by Ayes --
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) 96.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 7
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk
of the City of Maplewood Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have
carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a
regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of
, 1988 with the original on file in my office, and the
same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the
same relates to this rezoning.
Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city
this day of , 1988.
City Clerk, City of Maplewood
011
Planning Commission
Minutes 11-7-80
-4-
B. Cypress St.: Knollwood Circle (Goff Homes, Inc.)
Preliminary Plat
Rezoning
Secretary Olson presented the staff report" Director of Public
Works Ken Haider said regarding the grading of the site, the
$5,000 letter of credit, in the case of default, would be used
to stabilize the site"
There was no one from the audience who wished to comment on
this request for preliminary plat and rezoning"
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission approve the
Knollwood Circle preliminary plat, subject to the following
conditi6ns: '
a. The following conditions must be met before final
plat approval:
1> City staff approval of final grading, erosion
control, utility, drainage, street and tree
preservation plans" The storm sewer plan shall
address the localized flooding problem that
occurs in the vicinity of proposed lot one"
2) The development shall comply with the tree
preservation requirements of the Environmental
Protection Ordinance, At least 65 existing or
newly planted trees shall be on the site when
construction is complete"
D) Submit a signed developer's agreement with the
required surety for all required public
improvements.
4) Correct the legal description"
b" Any grading or extraction of sand or gravel must
comply with the City's mineral and soil excavations
and extractions ordinance (Chapter 36, Article IV),
with the following exceptions and additions:
1) Site grading within thirty feet of an adjoining
property line shall not commence until all of
the sand and gravel excavation activity has
ceased, as determined by the City Engineer,
except that no grading or excavation shall be
permitted within thirty feet of the west
property line.
Planning Commission
Minutes 11-7-88
~5~^
2> No noise from equipment is permitted before 8
a^m^ or after 4 p.m. No activity is permitted
on Saturdays, Sundays or holidays.
3) Soil material shall not be tracked onto Cypress
Street or County Road C.
4> Submit a $5,000 letter of credit and a signed
mineral extraction agreement to the City
Engineer, as directed by Section 36-412 of City
code"
5) Submit a schedule for the duration of all
grading and gravel extraction activity on this
site. This schedule shall address erosion
^ controk extraction, rehabilitation, rough and
final grading,
Commissioner Sletten seconded
Ayes~~Axdahl , Barrett,
Cardinal, Dempsey, Fiala,
Fischer, Larson, Sigmundik,
Sletten
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission approve the
resolution to rezone this site and the property adjoining to
the north from F, farm residence to R-1, single dwelling.
Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes--Axdahl , Barrett,
Cardinal, Dempsey, Fiala,
Fischer, Larson, Sigmundik,
Sletten
B. Code.Amendment: Planning Fees
Commissioner S annin9 Commission recommend
approval of the sing planning fees"
Commissioner Cardi d Ayes--Axdahl, Barrett,
Cardinal, Dempsey, Fiola,
Fischer, Larson, Sigmundik
\/ Sletten
The staff report
commissioners"
'
Bob En9wery / 26 ) the petitio see thei�pdeveloped"
prese discussed with the
19th Avenue, St" Paul, the originator of
the street imp ent, said he would like to
ent project approve d so this property can be
S
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
DATE:
E'ndorsod—
Modified._._, —_
ile j ected —r
Date -
City Manager
Associate Planner- - Johnson
Land Use Plan Amendment (RL to RM) , Rezoning
.(F to R -2 and R- 3),,and Lot Division
Southlawn Drive and Radatz Avenue
Jon Brandt (Contract Purchaser)
Jerry Grayson
November 3, 1988
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
Re gj : 1e fit_
The applicant is requesting approval of the following: (See the
map on page 11.)
1. A land use plan amendment from RL, residential low density
to RM, residential medium density and a rezoning from F, farm
residence to R -2, small -lot single and double dwelling for the
south part of this site. Four, small -lot single dwellings
are proposed. (Without the plan amendment, three conventional -
sized, single- dwelling lots could be created if the cul -de -sac i..
constructed.)
2. A rezoning from F to R -2, double dwelling and R -3, multiple
dwelling for the northerly part of the site. This portion of they
site is designated in the City's land use plan for RM lase. Two
double dwellings and a four -plea are proposed by the developer.
3. A lot division for Parcel Three (page 12).
The applicant is'proposing to construct a cul -de -sac which
would separate the two proposed zoning districts. Refer to the
map on page 11 and the letter on page 14. The applicant is also
proposing to phase the construction, as shown on page 12.
DISCUSSION
Lan Use Pla Amendment
The proposal on page 11 is consistent with the intent of the
policies of the land use plan, particularly those that govern the
transition between dissimilar land uses. The present land use
plan does not appear to have anticipated a cul -de -sac being
constructed within this property. Moving the boundary of the RM
designation to the south, as proposed, would allow RM L.isses to
face each other on the cul -de -sac. It would also allow the rear
Action by Council:
yards of the RM. uses, in this case, small -lot, single dwellings,
to be the transition to the Rj_ property, abutting to the south.
From Snldthlawn Drive and from the dwelling to the south, the
existence of the proposed small -lot single dwellings would not be
noticeable. The rear lot lines would range from 85 to 110 feet
in width. Standard -sized lots are only required to be 75 feet
wide.
7nne ChangP
The proposed F -2; double dwelling and F -3, multiple dwelling
zoning on the north side of the proposed cul -de -sac is compatible
with the existing land use plan and surrounding land uses. The
proposed R -2 zoning south a+ the proposed cul -de -sac_ is
consistent with this site, provided double dwellings are ruled
out. Council recently approved a similar rezoning for the single
dwelling at Frost Avenue and Flandrau Street for Patricia
Hensley. Approval allowed her to subdivide their property.
The problem is that until the cul -de -sac is guaranteed and the
small -lot, single - dwelling parcels are actually created, there is
no way, to prohibit a double dwelling from being constructed in
the requested R -2 zone proposed, south of the cul -de -sac.
Therefore, until the cul -de -sac can be guaranteed, Coi.rnc.il Should
not grant the requested R -2 zoning on this portion of the site.
Further, since state law requires a community's zoning ordinance
to be revised, as necessary, within nine months of a land use
plan Amendment, 'a decision on the' requested plan amendment should
also be delayed until the cul -de -sac is guaranteed.
Lot Divi
The applicant has also requested a lot division to create Parcel
Three (page 12) to construct a single dwelling as part of his..
first phase of development. Although this lot would comply
with R -1 lot area and width requirements, it would only Bove 90
feet of depth, until the cul -de -sac is constructed. Then it
would comply with City code, assuming the property is also
rezoned to R -2 use. Since the decision on the R -2 zoning is
being recommended for deferral until the cul-de-sac proposal i.s:>
decided, so should approval of this lot division.,
Approval at this time could lead to the following problems: (1)
if Council required or the property owner- elected to construct
standard -sized single- dwelling lots along the proposed
cul -de -sac, this lot would become a substandard corner- lot. It
would have less than 100 feet of frontage on the cul -de -sac. (2)
if a decision is made to abandon the cul -de -sac, the creation of
this lot, at this time, could interfere with the efficient use of
the property to the west.
2
RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve the resolution on page 17 to approve the rezoning of
the property west of the intersection of Southlawn Drive and
Radatz Avenue from F, farm residence to R -3, multiple dwelling,
R -2, double dwelling and R -1, single dwelling, as shown on page
13. Approval is on the basis of the four standard findings of
approval and that rezoning the southerly portion of the site from
F to R -1 will eliminate the potential of any farm - related
nuisance uses occurring in the area.
2. Table a decision on the requested RL, residential low density
to RM, residential medium density plan amendment and R -2 rezoning
for the southerly portion of the site until the applicant is
prepared to guarantee the construction of the proposed cul -de-
sac. Tabling is. on the basis that until the cul -de -sac is
approved and construction can be secured, a decision on the
appropriate land use is premature.
3. Table the lot division request to create a 90- X 121 -foot lot
in the southeasterly corner of the site until a decision is made
concerning the above- referenced cul -de -sac.
3
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Staff surveyed the 17 surrounding property owners within 350 feet
for their comments concerning this request. Of the ten replies,
two were in favor and eight objected. These responses were to
the plan on page 10. In response' to the concerns raised, the
applicant has submitted a revised plan (page 11).
In Favor Comments.
1. It would not have an adverse effect on surrounding property
values.
2. I (owner of property to the north) have an agreement with .Jon
Brandt, to support this rezone, conditioned upon Jon Brandt
installing a privacy fence, and whatever is necessary to screen
and buffer the BOM zoned property to the north.
Ob,iecti.o
1. We don't care to have so many multiple dwellings near us.
More single - family homes is what we would want.
2. I think they should build single- family homes. We have
enough multi - family dwellings.
3. Mahe all lots single family to keep traffic to a minimum.
We prefer B single dwellings to the applicant's proposal.
1 4. I am only in favor of single dwellings. We -are now beginning
to have trouble with hot - rodders from the HUD apartments behind
US and more rental property would only compound the problem.
5. See the letter on page 10 from the property owner to thr:�
south.
Staff reply to comments 1 -5: Refer to the applicant's revised
plan on page 11. The revised plan is consistent with the City's;
land use planning policies of providing gradual transitions
between distinctively different land uses and malting this
transition along rear property tines wherever possible. Refer -
the discussion section for more information.
6. Mr. Brandt said he would build single dwellings along his
south lot line. There was no R -2 zone on the plan that he
showed us (1795 Radatz Avenue).
Staff reply: Mr. Brandt's proposal is for small -lot single
dwellings. R -2 zoning is required for small -lot single
dwellings. The proposed use is an appropriate use to transition
between the more intensive uses to the north and conventional
single dwellings to the south.
4
REFERENCE
Gross Area: 2"41 acres
Existing land use: undeveloped
5�Urrot..I[L(Lin_q_Land Uses.
North: undeveloped property planned and zoned for commercial
development
East: two double dwellings north of Radatz Avenue and two single
dwellings south of Radatz Avenue
South: A single dwelling on a 100~ x 295-foot lot"
West: Public property planned for open space use"
.
1. Land use plan designation: The north 2/3/s~-RM
residential medium density. The south 1/3-~^ RL, residential low
density.
2. Density:
a. Presently planned density: 22 people/acre (north
2/3/s) and 14 people/net acre (south 1/3) or an average of
17,8 people/net acre for the entire site.
b" Proposed density (2.01 net acres);
Site Plan on page 11 (present code): 21,0 people/net acre
(proposed code): 17.5 people/net acre
C. Permitted density if plan amendment is approved:
22 people/net acre for the entire site
3" Policies from the plan:
a. Page 18-5: Transitions between distinctly differing
types of land uses shall be accomplished in an orderly
fashion which does not create a negative (economical, social
or physical) impact on adjoining properties"
b" Page 18-5: Whenever possible, changes in types of land
use shall occur along rear property lines, so that similar
uses front on the same street " ^ ^
C. The RL, land use designation allows a variety of
single-dwelling homes. An occasional double dwelling may
also be allowed.
5
d" The RM land use classification is designated fpr such
housing types as single dwellin9s on small lots, double
dwellin9s, townhouses and mobile homes.
e" Page 18-8: //The City land use plan should be the guide
in determining population density and distribution, although
some flexibility for changing land use patterns and
densities should be maintained."
f" Page 18-9 "Locate multiple-family housing in areas not
inferior to those generally used for conventional single-
family housing.
4° Zoning: F, farm residential
5. Compliance with land use law:
a, , This proposal complies with the lot dimension
requirements for the uses proposed,
mb/rjbrandt
Attachments:
1" Hazelwood Land Use Plan Map
2" Proposed Land Use Plan Amendment
3° Property Line/Zoning Map
4" Original proposal sent to neighbors
5" Revised Proposal
6" First Phase Site Plan
7" Staff proposed rezoning
B. Letter from the applicant
9. Petition
10^ Letter from the neighbor to the south
11° Resolution (rezoning)
Interchange — ,1- principal arterial 894 Interchange
Vadnale Heights / H sc --
__ major
Co. R , D ill II collector
1 I BW
i R6 �■
. I
I major ' n m ■ 2
I I I I
IF collector]
1 �� l'
major Collect orl�
B W
O M
D.
yy i O .r • 11 p ��r Jill 0
11 46.
CO. C ? „1 11 igor rterlQt._
ilailit, i— I CCii 1
SC v. in
man
�r L y
Os
s
IS C H
' aellne terms — B W
OS R� n Lscl
1 I: R m — en' C
Major cone – ..Garvnl n�
>•1a�.a tete as can a r Utensil A : ,
Jr
I
BW 4 it � M — '� ! BW 'tsc .
T -
1
1 � Jm.•i,' ...... M H
It
- o
S
`-
m
s o
a
E ;
rjal I
HAZELWOOD
LAND USE PLAN
7
'4
Attachment 1
'3AV WV38
Q
El Area
to
be
amended
from
RL
to
RM.
Proposed
LAND USE PLAN
AMENDMENT
8
Attachment 2
4
\ � OQQ. NO. lB 985BB
o rn
'� 'N I $9 '
� T ••' loe loo'
.OL AO,
TIO .76 ac
$° 33,000•
'8711"' Y•
(- 38 - 0) , o
ao �
N
Ir N
MI
�B�\ So
5.0o a(. l GRaa
r
v{L:LAGE OF `p1APLEW OD
119)
TZ
v v f • •f. Doe.` 11•
N FOA SCAM AVC. I
n
(0�
440
0
(I4�
2.2'
G 600 S
5o Z
(ITS
{ 5) l
b
AD�3)�0�
— 2799 G 1
Q3� l
IQI l Z
' 3
1
8 , 0 .0 5. 68ec . 7
1 1fl
j 8j:•. . � C011NTr
kA M V1 4
=--=-- - LE 2'=f e Z
1
AVER - ter+
� 3
RAMS av
,/ •�'
�I N e0 r 60, CC ZT•(
D
O
G J 2 a ( .34.a 34w i4.f. .lK. „ 3•
2812 o I N N M X 32 '�
2 804 A �G (asl ¢ (M) (2
0 240 so
1 ' k47)
T- - - - I_-,j 41 -,Ir
(4e) 6 4
( 7 —
° o
177 / Y_
;1.91 IN
1
I -J
2.94ec. 3.056. 05
PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP
(Existing)
9 Attachment 3
0 N
N .. _..
41 o
•$• a peple�. T �p/
p•p�� @@���j{
1�'G ld EMIRfiellll'n ' ./eVW Jq
..
{ J
360. t9.
434 13
. .
1 .
•
leo 'q I
G n
B3 Sj
BO ®
Ill
•
•
f f .IY 4 I J., . :.IJ
-
O
N
r
,
\ � OQQ. NO. lB 985BB
o rn
'� 'N I $9 '
� T ••' loe loo'
.OL AO,
TIO .76 ac
$° 33,000•
'8711"' Y•
(- 38 - 0) , o
ao �
N
Ir N
MI
�B�\ So
5.0o a(. l GRaa
r
v{L:LAGE OF `p1APLEW OD
119)
TZ
v v f • •f. Doe.` 11•
N FOA SCAM AVC. I
n
(0�
440
0
(I4�
2.2'
G 600 S
5o Z
(ITS
{ 5) l
b
AD�3)�0�
— 2799 G 1
Q3� l
IQI l Z
' 3
1
8 , 0 .0 5. 68ec . 7
1 1fl
j 8j:•. . � C011NTr
kA M V1 4
=--=-- - LE 2'=f e Z
1
AVER - ter+
� 3
RAMS av
,/ •�'
�I N e0 r 60, CC ZT•(
D
O
G J 2 a ( .34.a 34w i4.f. .lK. „ 3•
2812 o I N N M X 32 '�
2 804 A �G (asl ¢ (M) (2
0 240 so
1 ' k47)
T- - - - I_-,j 41 -,Ir
(4e) 6 4
( 7 —
° o
177 / Y_
;1.91 IN
1
I -J
2.94ec. 3.056. 05
PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP
(Existing)
9 Attachment 3
0 N
ORIGINAL PROPOSAL
(Sent to Neighbors for Comment)
10 Attachment 4
n N
'3Ad MRS
m
F1
cr) (aa bre
X 3
cc
J tll�ti5, g
w
< N ;
'1S Z1ya"
l $Fa�
o
Z
>
r O to 0
a. a.
u
cc
Z
-
�
J
O
REVISED PROPOSAL
(This plan was submitted in response to City staff
and neighborhood concerns received regarding the
original plan on page 10) N
11 Attachment 5
'3AV WV38.
U
PAR
Ta 3 2
is Z.tvava (Zoning districL2 boundary only -- ARCEL 3
lot line)
Z
LL . 3
a
� J
F
0
CO
. ............_...
Appli.can.t''s Proposed First Phase
(Parcel Two would not be.subdivided until
the cul —de —sac is constructed)
12
Attachment 6
4 1 N
•3AV WV39.
U
ra '
PARCEL 1
Do•b�e, a i
M'
M
R3 i -
(Existing propert
line to be
when parcels _
combined) PARCEL 2
0
RI
U
J
CO
I
IL
To 're Rain Plant
Rl .•u
is guaranteed
UL
for
D:
O
Z
a
x
H
0
N
-Staff's Proposed Rezoning
(Until a cul —de —sac is approved and
construction is secured)
0 N
, .Ls z1VOVH - -
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT & REZONING APPLICATION STATEMENT
Jon W. Brandt, Applicant
In order to develop the land described in the attached application, I am
requesting the City of Maplewood to support the following:
1) Rezoning:
Currently: F (Farm)
Proposed: R -2, R -3 (Multifamily Residential)
2) Density Reclassification:
Currently: 2/3 Medium Density Residential,
1/3 Low Density Residential
Proposed: All Medium Density Residential
The subject land is approximately 2.4 acres, located one block south of
Maplewood Mall. It is borderd to the North by commercial (BC -M) land, and to
the west by public land. Adjacent to the southeast corner are two single
family homes. Across the street are two non -owner occupied twin homes.
At the time that the Comprehensive Land Use Plan was established, there were
two parcels of land, owned by one person. They have been susequently
purchased and combined to create one parcel for development purposes. The
northern two - thirds is classified as "medium density residential" in the
current Land Use Plan.
The subject land lies in what is typically a "transition area" between
residential and commercial development. Multifamily housing in this type of
transition area is in keeping with good city planning practices and
substantially consistent with Maplewood's Land Use Plan.
The requested R -2/R -3 zoning change would allow the development of two twin
homes and one four plex on the back of the property. Current plans are to
build a twin home on the N.E. corner lot. Future plans, at the time of
platting and construction of the culdesac, would include four small lot single
homes on the southern one -third of the property. The small lot singles, and
multi - family homes would create a graduated buffer or transition from R -1 (on
the south) to BC -M on the North.
The initial construction is intended to be owner occupied. All construction
is intended to be at least comparable to the middle- income homes in the area.
Existing construction within 350 feet of the subject land includes middle -
income single homes, middle income twin homes, and 57 lower income town homes.
Commercial development adjacent to the land's northern border is a certainty.
It's the applicant's contention that the quality of the development will
maintain or enhance existing real estate values, while "insulating" existing
single family homes from commercial development directly to the north.
14 Attachment 8
PUBLIC LAND
F
R -
SOUTHLAWN DRIVE
r
N
N
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD - REZONING PETITION
PROPOSED ZONING
w
a
g
w
m
We petition the Maplewood City Council to rezone the above
described property from (F) Farm, to (R- 2,R -3) Multi- residential.
Written signature of any person's name on this petition is
indication of that person's understanding of'the proposed zone,
the proposed location and an endorsement for approval of such change.
REZONING APPLICATION
JON W.BRANDT
BC -M
15 Attachment
SIGNATURE PRINT NAME ADDRESS
Herman & Lila Johnson
2799 Southlawn Drive
Commentse
I object to this proposal because we will have the back yards of
3 undetermined quality homes butted along our side line. I was
told six years ago that all of the lots south of Radatz Street
would be zoned single family, and that the village would not do
spot zoning changes.
My lot is 100 feet wide and the lot next to me, the one the north
is 121 feet wide, which lines up with the south boundary of
Radatz Street and makes another nice site for a single-family
lot, the same as it is directly across the street of Southlawn
Drive.
These homes south of Radatz Street are all nice new single - family
homes, and I feel it will be a very degrading move, to change the
zoning in the middle of the block, so that some developer can buy
a single - family lot, and divide it up into three parcels for
multi - family sites.
He is showing no concern for the present property owners, and it
appears his only motive is an instant profit from the real estate
because of the zoning change.
I hope you and the village council will consider our feelings on
this matter and limit his multi - family units on the 247 -foot lot
north of Radatz Street only. Thank you for any help you can
offer in this matter.
16 Attachment 10
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a
City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota
held in the Council Chambers in said City on the
v 198 at 7 p.m.
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
regular meeting of the
was duly called and
day of
WHEREAS, Jon Brandt and the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning
from F, farm residence to R-1, single dwelling; R-2 double dwelling;
and R^^3 multiple dwelling for the following-described properties:
All in Section 3, Township 29, Range 22:
To R-3 multiple dwelling--the North 187 feet of the West 145,2
feet of the South 247 feet of the North 691 feet of the East
318.15 feet of the SE 1/4, subject to road"
To R-2 double dwelling--South 247 feet of North 691 feet of East
318 15/100 feet of S.E. 1/4, subject to �oad except the West
145"2 feet and the South 30 feet thereof"
To R-1 single dwelling--South 121 feet of North 812 feet of East
318 15/100 feet of S.E. 1/4 subject to road, together with the
Sobth 30 feet of the East 140 feet of the South 247 feet of the
North 691 feet of the East 318"15 feet of the S.E. Quarter, and
the South 60 feet of the West 145°2 feet of the South 247 feet of
the North 691 feet of the East 318,2 feet of the South East
Quarter.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1" This rezoning was initiated by
pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of
Ordinances.
2" This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning
Commission on , 1988" The Planning Commission
recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be
3" The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on
, 1988 to consider this rezoning" Notice thereof was
published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said
hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written
statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of
the City staff and Planning Commission"
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that
the above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following
findings of fact:
17 Attachment 11
1° The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose
and intent of the zoning code.
2" The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract
from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the
neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area
included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3" The proposed change will serve the best interests and
conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare.
4" The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the
logical efficient, and economical extension of public services and
facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection
and schools"
5" Approval of this rezoning would eliminate the possibility of
a farm-related nuisance use occurring in this area.
Adopted this day of v 1988"
Seconded by Ayes--
STATE OF MINNESOTA }
)
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS.
)
CITY OF MAPLEWDOD )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk
of the City of Maplewood Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have
carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a
regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of
, 1988 with the original on file in my office, and ^
the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as
the same relates to this rezoning" �
Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the city
this day of , 1988°
City Clerk
City of Maplewood
I B.]
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 -EAST COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
NOVEMBER 7, 19%
I" .CALL
�
Chai
II. ROLL
0 ' III
IV.
TO ORDER
n,Axdahl called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m.
Commissio
Commission
Commissiones,
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Lester Axdahl
Michael Ayers
Richard Barrett
Robert Cardinal
rank Dempsey
Lo rainne Fij
Ralph lett
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. OctUber 3, 1988
Present
Absent
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Absent
Present
Present
Present
Commissioner S1 tte moy Commission approve the
minutes , 19
Commissioner t second Axdahl, Barrett,
Cardi nal, Fiola sct
Fisch Larson,
en
ntions~~Dempsey,
ndik
APPROV
Commis ndik m oved the Plan g Commission approve
the a\gitted" \
Commy
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. SouthlAwn Dr. and Radatz Ave":
Plan Amendment
Rezoning
Lot Division
Ay l, Barrett,
Cardin Dempsey, Fiola,
Fischer, Larson, Sigmundik,
Sletten \`
Brandt
Planning Commission
Minutes 11~7-BB '
-2-
Secretary Olson and Associate Planner Randall Johnson presented
the staff report"
Jon Brandt, 2934 Highway 10, Moundsview the applicant, said he
had revised his original proposal after discussions with staff
and neighbors, to include two double dwellings on Southlawn
Drive, rather than the tri-plex originally proposed.
Herman the occupant of the property on the south side
of the applicant's property, said he would like to see single-
family dwellings built on this property.
Micky Manders, of 2804 Southlawn Drive, said he does not feel
that the four-plex or double dwellings are compatible with the
single-family dwellings in the neighborhood"
Margaret Earley, the occupant of the property across the street
from the applicant's property, discussed who would be paying
for the proposed cul-de-sac" Ms. Earley said she would like to
see single dwellings built in the area.
Jon Brandt, the applicant, said that he would like the City
staff to.meet with the neighbors to try to work out a
compromise on what kind of development will be compatible with
the area"
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend
approval of the resolution to approve the rezoning of the
property west of the intersection of Southlawn Drive and Radatz
Avenue from F, farm residence to R-3, multiple dwelling, R-2,
double dwelling and R-1, single dwelling. Approval is on the
basis of the four standard findings of approval and that
rezoning the southerly portion of the site from F to R-1 will
eliminate the potential of any farm-related nuisance uses
occurring in the area"
Commissioner Dempsey seconded
Ayes--Axdahl v Barrett, '
Cardinal, Dempsey, Fiola,
Fischer, Larson, Si9mundik,
Sletten
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission table a
decision on the requested RL, residential low density to RM,
residential medium density plan amendment and R-2 rezoning for
the southerly portion of the site until the applicant is
prepared to guarantee the construction of the proposed cul-de-
sac. Tabling is on the basis that until the cul-de-sac is
approved and construction can be secured, a decision on the
appropriate land use is premature"
Planning Commission
Minutes 11-7-88 .
-3~^
Commissioner Sletten seconded
Ayes--Axdahl Barrett,
Cardinal , Dempsey, Fiola,
Fischer, Larson, Sigmundik,
Slett6n
Commissioner
Fischer
moved the Planning Commission table the
lot division
request
to create a
90~ X 121-foot lot in the
southeasterly
corner
of the site
until a decision is made
concerning the
.
above-referenced
cul-de-sac.
Commissioner
Sletten
seconded
Ayes~^_Axdahl , Barrett,
Cardinal, Dempsey, Fiola,
'
Fischer, Larson, Sigmundik,
'
Sletten
VI" VISITOR\PRESENTATIONS
VII, COMMUNICAT
VIII. NEW BUSINESS
A. Home Occuo`tion License: 11 Laurie Rd, (Catlin)
The staff report\was p
Kevin Catlin, the e u said this business is his only
source of-income, it his other job. Mr. Catlin said
he feels the citized\compl ints against his business have been
exaggerated. Mr" Ca in �aid he felt he should be
����-- en sc
grand+athered into th icense since he has an existing
business. Mr. Catlin A he does not have any employees
id he c
working for him, drivers. Mr. Catlin is said he does minor repairs and
maintenance onl y.
|�e Commission
�u u/ ^/=ss u/ lea sing ".= c".~"
The Commission scuss e taxi~cab repair and
maintenance bu nd the ighborhood problems these kinds
of businesses " \
Commission letten moved to e this request for a
home occup on license to operate a taxi-cab business can obtain a legal Anion.
until st ��
~~Axdahl , Barrett,
inal Dempsey, Fiola,
F
her, Larson, Sigmundik,
OSlften
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
OWNER /APPLICANT:
PROJECT:
DATE:
City Manager
Director of Community Development
Flan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit
Larpenteur Avenue and Sylvan Street
St. Paul Water Utility
Clear Water Holding Pond
September 15, 19FJB
SUMMARY
Introduction
Action by Council:
Endorsed._
Modif i ed_
ReJected—
Date�
The applicant is requesting a comprehensive plan amendment and
conditional use permit to construct a clear water holding pond.
(Refer to the letter and maps on pages 7 -9 describing the pond and
its purpose.) The plan amendment is required because the property
is designated for park use. A conditional use permit is required
for a public utility use in a farm residential district.
E;
This property is designated as a search area for a community
playfield in the City's park system plan. (See page 10.) Community
playfietds are intended to be at least ten acres and to serve a
city -wide need for athletics, including parking, toilets and
lighting. The parks plan states that at ultimate development, the
City will be deficient of 100 acres of land for community
playfietds. This is based on an ultimate City population of
76,68. This population pro,iection seems high, since the City is
currently 2/3 developed with a population of 29,000.
The City had leased this site for park use from 1974 -86. The site
was never developed because of neighborhood opposition.
Co de Findings R
City Code requires ten findings for approval of a conditional use
permit. Refer to the resolution on page 12.
Recommendation
I. Approve the resolution on page 11, deleting the park
designation for this site from the comprehensive plan, on the
basis that:
A. The City's director of parks and recreation feels that the cost
of a community playfield or any other type of park on this site
cannot be justified.
B. This site is needed for a water treatment pond.
C. The ultimate City population used to project the need for a
community playfield on this site appears to be too high.
D. The City leased this site for park from 1974 -86, but did not
develop it because of neighborhood opposition.
II. Approve the resolution on page 12, approving a conditional use
permit for a clear -water pond, subject to the following conditionaa
A. The pond shall only be used to store clarified water from the
spent lime lagoons.
P. A landscaping plan, showing enough landscaping to create a more
park -like atmosphere, shall be submitted for staff approval.
C. There shall be no dumping or storing of borrow materials on
the site.
D. The pump station shall be placed underground.
E. There shalt be no odors from the pond.
N
CITIZEN COMMENTS
City S �irvey
17 of the 35 property owners within 350 feet of the site responded to a
survey. Seven were in favor, five had no comment and four objected. One
person both objected and was in favor. He thought the pond would be an
improvement over what is there now, but felt the water would draw
unwanted geese.
Those in favor gave the following comments:
No mosquitos, odors or noisy pumps.
Stipulate that this pond will not become a lime deposit pond in the
future.
The police should patrol this area often, especially if it starts
becoming a drinking spot for young adults.
The pond would improve the looks of the area and get rid of the
noisy trucks which are there constantly now.
Those opposed gave the following comments:
This is a commercial installation in a residential neighborhood,
which will facilitate a nuisance and an eyesore.
Land values will depreciate and a public liability will result. The
return of this land to a community playfield would be an acceptable
asset to the community.
We need a park for the children in this area. Why not put in a nice
playground or softball diamonds, tennis courts or something we could
all use. Roseville does. 1'd like to see more from Maplewood.
A nice park for the kids would have a lot of neighborhood support.
The community playfield concept has never been developed and given
an opportunity to evolve. Let's give it a try.
(Note: There were four people favoring a park. One lives on Sylvan
Street, two on Gurney Street and one on Maple Lane in St. Paul.)
Water Utility Meeting
The Water Utility and the City Engineer met with the neighbors on Sylvan
Street. The neighbors at this meeting said they did not want a park,
picnic tables or anything that would attract people from outside the
neighborhood.
3
REFERENCE
Site Descri
Area: 9.4 acres
Surrounding land uses
North; Water works road and property
West: Railroad tracks
south: Larpenteur Avenue
East: Single - dwelling homes
kd
Att achments :
1 Land use plan
2. Property line /zoning map
3. Letter- Water Utility
4. Site plan
5, . Cross- section
6. Park system plan
7. Resolution- plan amendment
B. Resolution- conditional use permit
9. Letter - Parks
O
4
log
or collecloir A
M no
won
w an
0 NON
no
No
1C a ■o
EM
an
' :1111111111111111
1 ;111111 - 111111
.■ ■ � i iiii l
lulls
see
WESTERN HILLS
LAND USE PLAN
5
Attachment 1
0
M E R ,5,. ,
' 4 L
W
F-'
N�
rI
t.*3".
00" of Mbtsr Commie
E.
PROPERTY LINE"/ ZONING MAP
6 Attachment 2
-�f
i
� ff..
tl... _... . .......M .. .
U
IN
Clear Water Pond
St. Paul Water Utility
The proposed pond will be part of a recycling system for the St.
Paul Water Treatment Plant. It will provide temporary storage for
clarified water from the spent lime lagoons located to the north of
Roselawn Avenue. Only clear water from the surface of the lagoons will
be admitted to the pond.
The water will be pumped by an existing pump station from the
lagoon effluent ditch to a gravity pipeline to be constructed as part
of this project. At the pump station the water will be treated with
potassium permanganate as necessary to reduce the odor sufficiently for
recycling. The gravity pipeline will carry the water south along the
west edge of the water utility property to the pond.
At the south end of the pond another pump station will be
constructed to recycle the pond effluent back to the water treatment
plant. This pump station will be either an underground design or a low -
profile above - ground design suitable for use in a residential area.
As planned the pond will provide a major improvement to the site,
which is now being used for temporary storage of fill material. On June
29, 1988, a meeting to discuss the pond design was held, attended by
neighborhood residents, the Maplewood City Engineer, and representatives
of the St. Paul Water Utility and Progressive Consulting Engineers.
Many constructive suggestions were made by those attending which have
been incorporated into the design.
The attached drawing shows the contours or the pond as planned.
The water surface will be below the existing grade except at the
southwest, where a six foot high dike will be constructed. Inside and
outside side slopes will be 4:1 horizontal to vertical. The operating
water depth of the pond will be four feet. A maintenance roadway
surfaced with crushed rock will circle the pond; access to the roadway
will be at the north end through a cable gate.
The land is designated as a community playfield at present, but it
has never been utilized as such. An application for comprehensive plan
amendment accompanies this application.
Attachment 3
"It
,, r t u � ( r if F
I
Vill
A
SS
Attachment 4
Cross—Section
3
9 Attachment 5
Oq
lu
u
Cross—Section
3
9 Attachment 5
U)
R)
Cq-
4 fa 0
OD
r j
o
D
fj
U,
- It
oS t In
'a
7 In
(Am IM
L C)
> I 1 3111111111
F C) kjo CD
CO a.
U-
It a.
U. Z,
U)
(A Z
Co
0
In
'I
I i I
LM
U.
Y
(Hill Szo
P12
oil
@
R IB
FS 10 Attachment
PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the St" Paul Water Utility initiated an amendment to the
Maplewood Comprehensive Plan from P, park to W, water facility for the
following property at the northwest corner of Larpenteur and Sylvan.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as
follows:
1. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on
September 19, 1988 to consider this plan amendment" Notice thereof was
published and mailed.pursuant to law. All persons present at said
hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written
statements. The planning commission recommended to the city council
that said plan amendment be approved.
2" The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on
October 10, 1988" The council considered reports and recommendations
from the planning commission and city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that
the above-described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the
following findings of fact:
1" The City's Director of Parks and Recreation feels that the
cost of a community playfield or any other type of park on this site
cannot be justified"
2. This site is needed for a water treatment pond"
3" The ultimate City population used to project the need for a
community playfield on this site appears to be too high"
4. The City leased this site for a park from 1974`~86, but did
not develop it because of neighborhood opposition.
Adopted this 10th day of October, 1988.
Seconded by Ayes--
11
Attachment 7
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and
held in the council chambers in said city on the 10th day of October,
1988 at 7 P.M.
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
WHEREAS, the St. Paul Water Utility initiated a conditional use
permit to construct a clear -water pond at the following- described
property:
Lots 1 thru 10, Block 5 Lots 1 thru 19, Block 10, Lots 1 thru 8
and all of Lot 19, Block 9, St. Aubin & Dion's Rice Street
Addition, together with those portions of vacated alleys and
vacated Park Street, Kingston Avenue and Price Avenue accruing
thereto, subject to the Soo Line Railroad right -of -way, and the
following:
That portion of the Southwest one- quarter of the Southwest one -
quarter of Section 18, Township 29 North, Range 22 West described
as follows.
Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Section 18 thence
North along the West line of said section a distance of
878.66 feet; thence East along the North line of St. Aubin &
Dion's Rice Street Addition a distance of 548.1 feet to the
point of beginning; thence Easterly along the North line of
St. Aubin &< Dion's Rice Street Addition a distance of 414
feet; thence North 8 degrees 11' 00" East a distance of 264
feet; thence West along a line parallel with the North line
of St. Aubin & Dion's Rice Street Addition a distance of 474
feet; thence Southerly along the Easterly line of the Soo
Line right -of -way to the point of beginning.
Ramsey County, Minnesota.
This property is also known as the northwest corner of Larpenteur and
Sylvan.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is
as follows:
1. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood
Planning Commission on September 19, 1988. The planning commission
recommended to the city council that said permit be
12 Attachment 8
2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on October
10, 1988. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law.
All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be
heard and present written statements. The council also considered
reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL THAT
the above - described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of
the following findings -of -fact:
1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan
and with the purpose and standards of this chapter.
2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be
detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare.
3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated
to be compatible with the character of that zoning district.
4. The use would not depreciate property values.
5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to
present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare,
smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration,
general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on
local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or
parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties.
7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such
as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks.
8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at
public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be
detrimental to the welfare of the city.
9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and
scenic features into the development design.
10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. The pond shall only be used to store clarified water from the
spent lime lagoons.
2. A landscaping plan, showing enough landscaping to create a
more park -like atmosphere, shall be submitted for staff approval.
3. There shall be no dumping or storing of borrow materials on
the site.
13
4. The pump station shall be placed underground.
5. There shall be no odors from the pond.
Adopted this day of , 1988.
Seconded by Ayes- -
STATE OF MINNESOTA >
COUNTY OF FAMSEY ) SS.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD >
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk
of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have
carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a
regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of
, 1988, with the original on file in my office, and the
same is a full, true and complete transcript insofar as the same
relates to a conditional use permit.
Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city
this day of , 1988.
City Clerk
City of Maplewood
14
MEMORANDUM
To: Park and Recreation Commissioners
From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Parks & Recreatiorf V
Subj: Removal Of Sylvan Park As Designation For
Community Playfield
Dater September 13, 1988
The St. Paul Water Department is requesting approval from the
City of Maplewood for improvements to the property formerly
called Sylvan Park which was located at Larpenteur Avenue and
Sylvan. Since the property at one time was desigated for a Com-
munity Playfield in the City's Comprehensive Plan, it is re-
quested by the Director of Community Development Geoff Olson that
the Park and Recreation Commission make a recommendation to the
Planning Commission to officially remove the park from the Park
System Plan.
In 1974, the City of Maplewood entered into a lease arrangement
with the Board of Water Commissioners of the City of St. Paul for
the use of the property on Larpenteur and Sylvan, which is south
of the operating Water Treatment Plant. The park was to be used
for adult softball, but was never consummated due to neighborhood
opposition. In 1985, Mr. Thomas Mogren, General Manager for the
Board of Water Commissioners, notified the City that they were in
need of the property as a borrow source for Utility construction
projects and as a pipe storage area. This matter was brought to
the Park and Recreation Commission on June 17, 1985, as a point
of information.
The Community Playfield designation for the area indicated that
it was the intent of the City to have a facility that would serve
the City -wide need for athletics. Community Playfield sites are
scheduled for recreation programs, both youth and adult, and
should provide good accessibility to three to five neighborhoods.
The sites are usually suited to intensive development and adja-
cent to collector or arterial streets. in addition to the ath-
letic facilities, the supportive facilities would include park-
ing areas, toilets, lighting, etc.
Since the St. Paul Board of Water Commissioners could make a very
good case for health, welfare, and safety of the water supply,
and the need for this property to accomplish this, it is highly
unlikely that the City could either buy or condemn the property
for park purposes.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Park and Recreation Commission go on
record as releasing the property formerly called Sylvan Park on
the Park System Plan as a designated Community Playfield for the
City of Maplewood and recommends to the City Planning Commission
that it be deleted from the Comprehensive Plan.
15 Attachment 9
F -�
Planning Commission
Minutes 9 -19 -BB
-2-
Bill Cha man, 365 E. Kellogg Blvd., St. Paul, a planning
consultan working with the Migglers on their site, explained
the Miggle concern with additional sewer costs from the main
going thro their property. Mr. Chapman ecommende'd that
shared costs or the new street be based actual length, size
and depth „of s er necessary to serve pr posed platted lots
from an existin sewer on Highway 61 fr ntage road.
Dick Sullivan of DOT questioned wh a the proposed sewer line
would run across th %rMInDOT property Commissioner Fischeved the pl nning commission recommend:
1. Approval of the re luti
element of the comprehen 've
trunk line, northwest fro t
Facility, through the Miggl r
and west of Gerten Pond)
Highway 36 as presently an
following findings:
orb( to amend the sanitary sewer
lan to reroute a planned future
e proposed MnDOT Research
property (north of Gervais Avenue
ighway 61, rather than along
pd. Approval is based on the
a. The Highway / 116 alignm nt would be more costly,
because it WOU14/be con
stru ted in the frontage road. The
Miggler alignmeht would be b ilt with a new street and the
costs shared th the Miggle development.
b. 'There i already a sewer n the frontage road to
serve adja nt properties. Put ing the sewer through the
M/ents e would serve abuttin properties as well as
ra lift station.
2. Mding that the proposed s reet improvement is
consis the comprehensive plan. Also, require that any
rights N corridor be deeded to th City.
3. Mding that the proposed drai age and water main
improvre not part of the comprehensive plan and,
there+'inconsistent with the compreh nsive plan.
4. Approval of the resolution to prohibit pa king on the
sou side -of Gervais Avenue.
Commissioner Dempsey seconded Ayes-- Axdahl, arrett,
Cardinal, Dempsey, Fiola,
Fischer, Sigmundik, Sletten
B. Larpenteur Ave. and Sylvan St. (St. Paul Water Utility)
Plan amendment
Conditional use permit
0
Planning Commission -3-
Minutes 9 -19 -88
Secretary Olson presented the staff report. Bob Odegard,
Director of Parks and Recreation, explained the present park
system plan and future plans for park development. -
Commissioner Fischer moved the planning commission recommend:
I. Approval of the resolution deleting the park designation
for this site from the comprehensive plan, on the basis that:
A. The City's director of parks and, recreation feels
that the cost of a community playfield or any other type
of park on this site cannot be justified.
F. This site is needed for a water treatment pond.
C. The ultimate City population used to project the need
for a community playfield on this site appears to be too
high.
D. The City leased this site for a park from 1974 -86
but did not develop it because of neighborhood opposition.
II. Approval of the resolution approving a conditional use
permit for a clear -water pond, subject to the following
conditions:
A. The pond shall only be used to store clarified water
from the spent lime,lagoons.
B. A landscaping plan, showing enough landscaping to
create a more park -like atmosphere, shall be submitted for
staff approval.
C. There shall be no dumping or storing of borrow
materials on the site.
D. The pump station shall be placed underground.
E. There shall be no odors from the pond.
Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes-- Axdahl,.Barrett,
Cardinal, Dempsey, Fiola,
Fischer, Sigmundik, Sletten
VI. VISI R ESENTATIONS
VII. CO ATIONS
0
/
/
/
�
'
MEMORANDUM
To: City Manager
From: Director of Community Development
Subject: Hong Kong Cafe Permit
Date: October 27, 1988
�
Action by Council:
Dodorao8.~__~~~~~~
Modified.
Duta
The City Council, at their October 24 meeting, tabled a request to
revise the conditional use permit for the Hillside Center (1690
McKnight Road) to expand the Hong Kong Cafe and permit additional
restaurants in the center in the future, The Council requested an
explanation as to why the original permit for the Hong Kong Cafe
was issued without a revision to the conditional use permit.
Council also asked staff to determine if there are any businesses
selling alcohol in BC(M) zoning districts.
The permit was issued in error. Condition two of the conditional
use permit states that "All uses shall conform with the BC(M),
business commercial (modified) zoning district requirements,''
Restaurants are allowed in the BC(M) zoning district by
conditional use permit" A conditional use permit was approved
for a planned unit development (PUD) on this site" The permit did
not include a restaurant" Tom Ekstrand, an associate planner
reviews each building permit to assure compliance with zoning and
Community Design Review Board conditions. Tom neglected to check
the conditional use permit conditions" In order to avoid this
situation in the future, I will be checking each permit after
Tom's review, We apologize for the error and hope that this
change in procedure will avoid a reoccurrence"
While it is unfortunate that this mistake was made, it should not
bias tha decision on the conditional use permit. The Hong Kong
Cafe is not at fault and has not caused any problems" It meets
the findings for a conditional use permit" In addition, there is
a restaurant, Ribs Plus, in the commercial center across the
street.
In regard to liquor sales, there are no on-sale liquor sales in a
9C(M) district" There is one off-sale business ~ Sarrack/s on
Stillwater Road. In order to provide further protection for the
neighbors surrounding the Hillside Center, a condition has been
added to the conditional use permit recommendation, prohibiting
on~ sale liquor sales"
GO/GOHONGKONG
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Randall Johnson, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Revision
LOCATION: Hillside Center (1690 McKnight Road)
APPLICANT/OWNER: CNP Hillside Partners
DATE, September 28, 1988
SUMMARY
Introduction
The applicant is requesting a revision to the conditional use
permit for this commercial center to expand the Hong Kong Cafe
from 700 to 1,400 square feet and to permit one or two additional
restaurants to be located in Phase 2^ (Refer to the applicant's
letter on page 10.)
Criteria for Anoroval
The ten findings on the resolution on page 12 must be met to
approve a conditional use permit.
Discussion
The proposed uses are appropriate for this location" Adequate
parking is available to expand the Hong Kong Cafe, as proposed"
However there may not be enough parking proposed in Phase 2 to
support a second restaurant. Restaurants require two to three
times the number of parking spaces as retail and office uses"
The police department and the applicant are unaware of any
problems that are the result of this center or of the Hong Kong
Cafe" However, in the Citizen Comment section, abutting property
owners state that they have experienced an increase in trespass
activity since this center opened. This trespass issue has been
a concern since the early to mid 1970s. To significantly reduce
this trespassing, a fence would have to be constructed north of
the pond, between the apartment and townhouse properties, not
along the applicant's north property line" As such, the
applicant should not be held responsible for this situation"
Recommendation
Approve the resolution on page 12 to revise the conditional use
permit for the Hillside Center planned unit development to permit
restaurants that comply with the City's parking and BC(M),
business commercial (modified), zoning district requirements.
Approval is for one year, subject to the original 7-27-87
conditions of approval, amended as follows (deletions are crossed
out and additions are underlined)s
1. Adherence to the site plan
Community Design Review Board.
may be approved by the board.
and conditions approved by the
Future changes to the site plan
2. All uses shall conform with the BC(M), business commercial
(modified) zoning district requirements. Rest shall also
3. External speakers shall be directed away from the dwelling
units and the sound shall not exceed fifty decibels (normal
conversation level) at the residential property line.
4. The maximum building height shall be one story.
S. There shall be no exterior storage or sale of goods or
merchandise.
6. +he- proposed- conetraet #en- moat- tre aabntent #t+ # + y- eterrted
may } } - and- ve #d:-- A -e #r.- month- t #me- extene #on may - 6e - requested - tiaa
a+ }owed - #n- Sect #on -96- 44 4d #- of - E #ty - code: There shall be no
vents for the underground fuel tanks within 200 feet of an
existing residence or the buildable area of the planned
undeveloped lots in the Currie Street Addition, south of
Larpenteur Avenue.
7. The type and anchoring of underground storage tanks must be
approved by the City Fire Marshal. The tanks shall be strapped
to a concrete slab.
2
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Staff surveyed 60 persons who own property within 350 feet of the
Hillside Center property" Of the 30 respondents six had no
comment, 12 were in favor and 12 were opposed.
Those in favor stated the following reasons:
1" I am in favor unless they will be issued a liquor license"
Staff reply: A liquor license will not be requested"
2. My only concern would be the aesthetics of the pond" Please
stress this point with the builder.
Staff reply: This proposal will not effect the pond" However,
the plans for Phase 2 (near the pond) have been approved subject
to conditions that include:
The landscape and grading plans shall be revised for staff
approval providing for:
a° The preservation of enough existing trees along the
west side of the pond to screen the proposed development
from the townhouses and apartments. Additional trees may be
required if needed for screening.
b. No part of the pond may be filled if the Soil
Conservation Service determines that it is needed for
nutrient assimilation under Section 9-191(4)(c) of the
City's environmental protection ordinance"
C. Revising the siteplan or reducing the building size if
needed to comply with items c and d above.
3" More restaurants would be an attractive and very useful
addition to the neighborhood. It would complete an already nice
center^
Those opposed raised the following concerns:
1. Already a shopping center on the other side of the street"
Too much congestion"
2. There is no need for more restaurants in this area" I
would like to know why you continue to ask our opinion
(townhouse association). We were opposed to the center and you
allowed it to be built anyway.
3. I own the Mapleleaf Center (northwest of McKnight Road and
Larpenteur Avenue) and I rent to Giuseppe Pizza and Ribs Plus"
Staff reply: This property is planned and zoned for commercial
use. The City has seriously considered past citizen comments.
3
The present site plan disturbs much less of the hill and trees
along the north boundary than would have occurred if council had
not denied the first proposal. The City cannot regulate land
uses on the basis of competition with other businesses,
4" You have already upset the environment enough" We are
tired of transient traffic throu9h and on our property (1720
McKnight Road) from the apartments to the east and the trash
that is left on our property is not acceptable"
5" I objected to Phase 1 and it didn't do much good. We
already have experienced what we feared, more theft, vandalism"
We don't need any more of it and more noise"
6" At the last hearing we attended, we were informed this
mini-mall would be fenced in so as not to have the traffic
coming through the townhouse property. I would, however,
approve if a family restaurant ~^ no pizza or fast food.
7. We and the city were told Phase 2 would be offices. We
trusted the developer" Restaurants mean more garbage, rats,
noise, booze and, perhaps, fights and urinating on the neighbors
lawn. (Refer to page 11 for additional comments.)
Staff reply: Council approved this development by conditional
use permit (CUP)" No fence was required. Council also has
applied zoning district rules that require a revision to the CUP
for restaurants" Council did this to insure that the concerns of
area residents are taken into consideration" If trespassing
continues to be a problem, the townhouse association should
request the city council evaluate the reasons for previously
prohibiting a fence to he constructed between the apartment and
townhouse properties. (Refer to the Discussion section.) The
police chief is unaware of any increase in vandalism or trespass
problems in this area"
B. They have no concrete plans for business not yet proven
viable. Appears that the pond shore will be filled"
Staff comment: Refer to comment Number Two under persons in
favor.
Ll
REFERENCE
Past - Act ions
This site:
7^~27-67: Council approved a conditional use permit for the
Hillside Center planned unit development" Approval was subject
to conditions" (Refer to the recommendation.)
7-25~8B: Council approved a two-year time extension for this
planned unit development, subject to the original conditions.
The Hong Kong Cafe was not included in this approval.
Other sites:
There are no other restaurants located in a BC(M) district
within the city,
9^-17-81: Council reconsidered its 8-20~~81 approval and denied a
conditional use permit for Pizza Time Theater to operate a
restaurant/video game arcade in the Hirshfield Center, south of
Beam Avenue" This property is zoned for BC(M) use" No reasons
for denial are listed in the minutes" However, council was
concerned that since this center backs up on single-dwelling
lots, cooking odors and noise would have been detected off the
premises.
5~^12-86: Council approved a conditional use permit for a Bonanza
restaurant in the BC-1Y1 district, southeast of Southlawn Drive and
Beam Avenue. This location backs up on a double and two single~
dwelling parcels"
1^ Section 36-438(c) of City code states:
"The development shall conform to the plan as filed with the
City" Any substantive variations from the plan shall
require recommendation by the planning commission and
approval by the city council after a public hearing."
2" Section 36-22 requires one parking space for each 200 square
feet of office retail space and one parking space for each fifty
square feet of patron area in a restaurant"
3. Phase 1 has 81 parking spaces striped. (Four to be part of
Phase 2 parking.)
a" If no restaurant use - 62 spaces are required"
b. With the Hong Kong Cafe at 700 square feet - 63 spaces
are needed.
�
C. With the Hong Kong Cafe at 1,400 square feet, as
presently proposed ~ 72 spaces are required"
4° The conditions of this PUD apply the BC(M) zoning district
regulations to this development. Section 36-155(c) requires a
conditional use permit to operate a restaurant in a BC(M) zoning
district,
S. Section 36-442(b) requires ten findings to approve a
conditional use permit, (Refer to the resolution on page 11.)
kd/hillside.mem
Attachments
1. Hillside Neighborhood Land Use Plan
2. Property Line/Zoning Map
3" Site Plan
4. Letter from the Applicant
5^ Letter from Neighbor
6" Resolution
4 4
1-^—Oi
major collect
T
l - � =P
P e _
RM
Rm
OS. s t
�
, majorarteria
S C t. 11 OS
� A
7 -
a
Rm
II 1 r Holloway
O$
I Rh = =
i q �
o Y
; S ;
�. Larpenteur
Rm
I�
BW '
r�
M
Hillside
NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN
` Attachment 1
io N
s
M
Hillside
NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN
` Attachment 1
io N
• v ��) D V. ;,.0 W : 40 s
lW 12 D. �d _
1=(r)'
s(•) t 3 ' a bn r.) ID a:l 1 i Nr
t o II F.) r `U .`, to
e• , 4WILLIAMS BROTHERS PIPELiN'E `
MG Q. �
C ' i '
..� p0•tes.e
'CS) • ) L
_ W: --
Y
ttl.t— �,. IU.1-- -•�,.�
ALJKMJRw wJRiwAI u t S w
D1.4I r.
.IS ++ Y M.. / {`( r .d NNnid �uL (, p :.. +
�� i 3' 6) ° m ( 1 «r ~ 4.w•a. rr 0 <ni '. (1• n .
ST. PAUL
I
HI'LLCREST • '.
GOLF COURSE
3
r
�) MAPLEWOOD
�.: '• APARTMENTS
IT
� -�A RPR4-E-VRS0IS�I�l 1�I�w�1�M� w���IMI =.
.� i 0.) '. X
u
2)00 _ ;)
'v, { 7 334
PROPOSED CAVE'S
4
CURRIE STREET ADO'N $. R(i //1.Z...
` ll 6•)
-
_
RI } J7_
,
6 '
u (Y) �(1 i• �
J
W
IL
d
m
w
W
Z
H
O
In
m
J
J
C_
e
. PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP
8 Attachment 2
�.... . n ^.R`v �_'..v^nm..... - •,'vivF,:KgS6T M ::A.a•.. � ,f }..- ya.,.a•:�• ".
e ` ) 7 ?1709
Cl #s , e
W 9
• �y RT IIe9
1
a
.11,•. el° r .R
Q•1,° D
10
}>
N
�1 i01
O .el
v. • (n) .T.��ii
4Ci
�2251s
ST. PAUL
I
HI'LLCREST • '.
GOLF COURSE
3
r
�) MAPLEWOOD
�.: '• APARTMENTS
IT
� -�A RPR4-E-VRS0IS�I�l 1�I�w�1�M� w���IMI =.
.� i 0.) '. X
u
2)00 _ ;)
'v, { 7 334
PROPOSED CAVE'S
4
CURRIE STREET ADO'N $. R(i //1.Z...
` ll 6•)
-
_
RI } J7_
,
6 '
u (Y) �(1 i• �
J
W
IL
d
m
w
W
Z
H
O
In
m
J
J
C_
e
. PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP
8 Attachment 2
�.... . n ^.R`v �_'..v^nm..... - •,'vivF,:KgS6T M ::A.a•.. � ,f }..- ya.,.a•:�• ".
I
' I
is jl
\
Phase 1 i
11.1
m
!
,•P\2\
r ; !
rf =
I
I
I i
I
0
-.._--- • - - --- ..— _...--- -- LerDenleur Avenue ..- ......._. _.
site Plan
aaaa t uor
Hong Kong Cafe,
Proposed Expansion of Hong Kong Cafe'
I
SITE PLAN
9 Attachment 3
n N
Welsh Companies, Inc.
11200 West 78th Street
WelshCompanies
July 29, 1988
Mr. Geoff Olson
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
RE: Application for P.U.D.
Hillside Center
1690 McKnight Road
Dear Mr. Olson
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
6129445810
CNP Hillside Partners, the owners of the Hillside Center, are formally
requesting a special use permit to permit the operation of restaurants in
Phase I and Phase II of the Hillside Shopping Center.
In Phase I, the Hong Kong Cafe currently operates in approximately 700 feet
of the center. We are proposing to expand the Hong Kong Cafe into the store
adjacent to it currently occupied by Anderson Cleaners so that the total
square footage for this restaurant would be approximately 1,400 square feet.
In Phase II we anticipate having additional food service uses, most likely a
pizza or Italian restaurant and perhaps an ice cream or yogurt shop. We,do
not have commitments from either one of these uses, or any other food uses
for that matter, so it is impossible to know specifically what our square
footage allocated to restaurants would be.
As you will note, our original plans have more than adequate parking for the
uses proposed. Under BCM, while we cannot define specifically how many
square feet yet would be set aside for food uses, we would anticipate that
they would be within the parking guidelines required by the City of
Maplewood.
We are requesting no changes in the P.U.D. as approved by the City Council,
nor any of the conditions attached thereto. We are simply requesting the
ability to expand an existing restaurant and to provide restaurants in Phase
II of our project.
We appreciate the support of the City of Maplewood and request the issuance,
of the special use permit for our shopping center.
Very tru ours
Daniel N. Parker
CNP Hillside Partners
DNP /lmy
Real Estate Development • Construction • Brokerage • Property Management • Investment Services
Attachment 4
10
u A Yo U Al c r'4 M 144 &�-T
C / Z 6
~i D /7"
?
C'`'` lee /`-D v pGEwu o.p l=o�L c� cr2
C S 'f- w o -7-r c T a OR
�ti'a��'
Lc�✓c E 7-0 1�t ' N f ./4 /cis
w t
- 5 - 6 _ w f4 1 CiV
�ft5r /�Z` Q s9
go U
J N ,L c
/N Y fit-! C /t/ % �/c CJGC�O t✓ S
Vp'T c i c
l = /�v o u /T
- C E Co �-r r �vTS / ✓c �rr4�C' Z�
��P a M C T/
lo,T i.v6 SS T / '4 J/�IJS1 o F
lAl { i
N / 7-0 uI,fcz
Tb
F az
ecl—
Attachment 5
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of
the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly
called and held in the council chambers in said city on the
day of , 1988 at 7 p.m.
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
WHEREAS, CNP Hillside Partners initiated a revision to the
conditional use permit to include restaurants. The property is legally
described as:
Lot 3, Block 1, Maplewoods Estates
This property is also known as 1690 McKnight Road, Maplewood;
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is
as follows:
1. This conditional use permit revision was reviewed by the
Maplewood Planning Commission on _ _ - - -_ _._. '___ - ----- ____ -+ 1988.
The planning commission recommended to the city council that said
permit be
2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on
, 1998. Notice thereof was published and mailed
Pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an
opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council
also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and
planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL THAT
the above- described conditional use permit revision be approved on the
basis of the following findings -of - fact:
1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan
and with the purpose and standards of this chapter.
2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be
detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare.
3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated
to be compatible with the character of that zoning district.
4. The use would not depreciate property values.
12 Attachment 6
5 " The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to
di land uses due to th
present and potential surrounding ` e noises, glare,
ff ibration
smoke dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run-o, vibration,
'
general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
6 The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on
loca = l " treets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or
d
parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties"
7 " The use would be serviced by essential public services, such
utilities
as streets, police, fire protection, v schools and parks"
8 " The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities ilities and services; and would not be
detrimental to the welfare of the city.
9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and
scenic features into the development design.
10" The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1 Adherence to the site plan and conditions approved by the
Commun Design Review Board" Future changes to the site plan may be
approved by the board.
2 ^ All uses shall conform with the BC(M), business commercial
i district requirements and (modified) zoning restaurants shall also be
allowed, provided that the City's parking requirements are met ^
3 " External speakers shall be directed away from the dwelling units and the sound shall h ll not exceed fifty decibels (normal
conversation level) at the residential property line.
4^ The maximum building height shall be one story"
5. There shall be no exterior storage or sale of goods or
merchandise.
6 There shall be no vents for the underground fuel tanks within
"
200 feet of an existing residence or th e buildable area of the planned
Addition, south of Larpenteur
undeveloped lots in the Currie Stree t A d on�
Avenue,
7 The type and anchoring of underground storage tanks must be
approv by t City Fire Marshal. The tanks shall be strapped to a
concrete slab.
13
Adopted this day of v 1988"
Seconded by Ayes-~^
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS.
)
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD )
I the undersigned being the duly qualified and appointed clerk
of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have
carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a
regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of
, 1988, with the original on file in my office, and the
same is a full, true and complete transcript insofar as the same
relates to a conditional use permit.
Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city
this day of , 1988.
City Clerk
City of Maplewood
14
Maplewood Planning Commission - 2 -
Minutes 10 -3 -88
A. Prelimina y Plats Woodlynn eights Townhomes No. 3
Randall Johnson, ssociate lots and an outlot.
Pi ner, presented the staff report
and discussed the quest f preliminary and final plat
approval to create f r to house
Chairman Axdahl asked i anyone in the audience wished to
comment on this propo 1. There were no comments.
Commissioner Fisch moved t e planning commission recommend
approval of e dlynn eig s T
th W H
ownhomes No. 3 preliminary
and final plat.
Commissioner Ordinal seconded yes -- Axdahl, Ayers,
/ rrett, Cardinal, Fiala,
F! cher, Sigmundik, Sletten
B. PUD Revisions Larpenteur Ave. and McKnight Rd. (Hillside
Center)
Associate Planner Randall Johnson presented the staff report.
Dan Parker, the developer with this project, said he had
reviewed the conditions of the staff recommendation and he was
in agreement with them.
Chairman Axdahi asked if there was anyone in the audience who
wished to comment on this requested revision of the conditional
use permit. There were no comments.
The commissioners discussed the past actions regarding this
center.
Commissioner Fischer moved the planning commission recommend
approval of the resolution to revise the conditional use permit
for the Hillside Center planned unit development to permit
restuarants that comply with the City's parking and BC(M)9
business commercial (modified), zoning district requirements.
Approval is for one year, subject to the original 7 -27 -87
conditions of approval, amended as followss
1. Adherence to the site plan
Community Design Review Board.
may be approved by the board.
and conditions approved by the
Future changes to the site plan
2. All uses shall conform with the BC(M), business commercial
(modified) zoning district requirements and restaurants shall
also be allowed, provided that the City's parking
are met.
Maplewood Planning Commission -3-
Minutes 10 -3 -e9
3. External speakers shall be directed away from the dwelling
units and the sound shall not exceed fifty decibels (normal
conversation level) at the residential property line.
4. The maximum building height shall be one story.
5. There shall be no exterior storage or sale of goods or
merchandise.
6. There shall be no vents for the underground fuel tanks
within 200 feet of an existing residence or the buildable area
of the planned undeveloped Lots in the Currie Street Addition,
south of Larpenteur Avenue.
7. The type and anchoring of underground storage tanks must
be approved by the City Fire Marshal. The tanks shall be
strapped to a concrete slab.
Commissioner Ayers seconded Bar�ettgdCardinal,sFiola,
Fischer, Larson, Sletten
C. Street Vacations English St.
The staff repprt was presented./
There was no rYen
tative p esent for the applicant, Metro
Imported Autos
The commissioncusse screening needs on the east side of
the property bg a esidential area. Associate Planner
Randall Johnsoif his business was expanded a
conditional us ould be required and this concern would
be addressed ame. Commissioner Ave the planning commission recommend
approval of thutio to vacate English Street north of
Kohlman Avenuet the south ten feet for the future
widening of Kvenue. Approval is on the basis Chats
1. The adJoi ng property ners have no interest in
improving the treet.
2. The adi ining properties h ve adequate street access.
3. This treet segment is not n eded for area traffic
circulati n or emergency vehicle a cess.
Approva is subJect to retaining a p'slirmanent twenty- foot -wide
public utility easement and a temporary forty- foot -wide utility
construction easement.
i
1 . i
Maplewood Planning Commission -3-
Minutes 10 -3 -e9
3. External speakers shall be directed away from the dwelling
units and the sound shall not exceed fifty decibels (normal
conversation level) at the residential property line.
4. The maximum building height shall be one story.
5. There shall be no exterior storage or sale of goods or
merchandise.
6. There shall be no vents for the underground fuel tanks
within 200 feet of an existing residence or the buildable area
of the planned undeveloped Lots in the Currie Street Addition,
south of Larpenteur Avenue.
7. The type and anchoring of underground storage tanks must
be approved by the City Fire Marshal. The tanks shall be
strapped to a concrete slab.
Commissioner Ayers seconded Bar�ettgdCardinal,sFiola,
Fischer, Larson, Sletten
C. Street Vacations English St.
The staff repprt was presented./
There was no rYen
tative p esent for the applicant, Metro
Imported Autos
The commissioncusse screening needs on the east side of
the property bg a esidential area. Associate Planner
Randall Johnsoif his business was expanded a
conditional us ould be required and this concern would
be addressed ame. Commissioner Ave the planning commission recommend
approval of thutio to vacate English Street north of
Kohlman Avenuet the south ten feet for the future
widening of Kvenue. Approval is on the basis Chats
1. The adJoi ng property ners have no interest in
improving the treet.
2. The adi ining properties h ve adequate street access.
3. This treet segment is not n eded for area traffic
circulati n or emergency vehicle a cess.
Approva is subJect to retaining a p'slirmanent twenty- foot -wide
public utility easement and a temporary forty- foot -wide utility
construction easement.
Agenda No,
Action by Council:
M E M O R A N D U M Endorsed - -___.
Modif i e d.� _.__ — .
Rejected ------- �.
TO: Mayor and City Council Date
FROM: City Manager 7vJwe �.
RE: TELEVISING COUNCIL MEETING
DATE: November 1, 1988
INTRODUCTION
The equipment to have Council meetings televised on cable television has been
installed with the exception of lighting which should arrive in the next 30
days.
DISCUSSION
There has been some discussion by the City Council about the pros and cons of
televising meetings, but no decision has been made to date.
Ginny Holder of Suburban Community Channels has offered to simulate a telecast
of a Council meeting. The Council and staff would then have an opportunity to
view the tape and better make a decision if future meetings should be
televised.
I recommend that the second meeting in January be taped by Suburban Community
Channels for review by the Council and staff to help determine the
desirability of televising future meetings.
MAM:kaz
}
. Action by Council:
Endorsed ~~..~-~.~~
�
Modified .-~�-~�~~
�
Rejected ~~_.~.~~~.
�
Date /'.~
�
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Gervais Avenue, English Street to MN/DOT Driveway
Project 88-14--Approval of Plans, Advertise for Bids
DATE: November 22, 1988
The subject plans ahe submitted for review and approval. The
attached resolution authorizes advertisement for bids.
`
jc
Attachments
�
RESOLUTION
APPROVING PLANS
ADVERTISING FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council
on September 26, 1988, plans and specifications for Gervais
Avenue English Street to MN/DOT Driveway, Project 80'14, have
' d d the direction of the city engineer, who has
been prepared under d ifi� ti
presented such plans an spec ca ns to the council for o
approval,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1" Such plans and specifications are hereby approved and
ordered placed on file in the office of the city clerk,
2" The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted
in the official paper and in the Constryctinn D911RAa an ent under
advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement
such approved plans and specifications" The advertisement shall
~ t least t days before
be published twice, a eas e» the date set for bid
opening shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids
ill be publicly opened and considered by the council at 9 a-m.,
on the e 2^ st day of December, 1988, at the city hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed an d filed with the clerk
and accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the
City of Maplewood, Minnesota for five percent of the amount of
such bid"
3 ° � The city clerk and city engineer are hereby authorized
i
and instructed to receive, open, and read aloud bids received at
the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate t he bids
"
received The council will consider the bids, and the award of a
il meeting of January 9 19B9
contract, at the regular city counc mee n � "
P
Action by Council:
MEMORANDUM Endorsed._._._._.
Modified — —
TO: City Manager Rejected_ - --
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Inspection Request Date
DATE: November 16, 1988
The attached letter from Carolyn Peterson requests that the
Maplewood building inspector check the homes ad,lacent to the
Water Utility lime ponds to determine what structural damage
has been done and to determine what caused this damage.
While we can sympathize with the concerns of these homeowners, it
would be inappropriate to involve City inspectors in this or
similar cases. The function and training of our building
inspectors is in the enforcement of the State Building Code. An
evaluation of structural damage should be done by a structural
engineer. The City should also avoid setting the precedent of
making non -code related inspections in civil disputes.
RECOMMENDATION
Take no action.
MEM01
Attachment: letter
October 28, 1988
Mr. Mike McGuire
City Manager, City Rall
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Res Damages to house from construction
activity at Water Utility
Dear Mike:
A number of homeowners living on Jackson St. and Roselawn Ave.
siufferred damages to their homes because of construction activity and haul-
ing done adjacent to their homes at the Water Utility lime ponds located
north of Roaelawn Ave. We believe that most of this damage was done in
1978 because of the large equipment that was used that year, including a
large pneumatic compactor, which was used for the first time there in 1978.
The huge grain trucks, bulldozers and compactor caused a shaking and vibra-
tion of the ground, and this caused extreme shaking of the homes in the area,
which mary residents compared to an earthquake.
The work was done between approximately March and December, 1987
and several neighbors repeatedly called Roger Mohror and Jack Fontaine at
the Water Utility, to report that this damage was occurring to our homes,
and that they would have to stop. Mr. Mohror reported this to DeCathelineau
Construction Co., the contractor, and the compactor or bulldozer would stop
for a day and then resume its work. This calling prooess, machine stopping,
and then resuming happened many times in 1987, but we did not know what else
to do to remedy this situation.
Damage to our homes includes cracks in interior walls & ceilinge,
cracks in foundations and foundation blocks, cracks in basement floors, crgcked
stucco walle nail pops, kitchen cabinets loosening from wall, shifted panels
is doors, broken windows, damage to roof caused by moss growing in lime, ex-
terior paint pitted and faded by lime deposits, etc.
Between December, 1987 and February, 1988, residents sent damage
estimates to Mr. Tom Mogren, Manager of the Board of Water Commissioners, and
he forwarded these estimates to DeCathelineau Co. An insurance adjustor ex-
amined the damaged homes in July. In August we each received a letter from
the insurance adjustor stating that negligence on the part of their insured
has not been established, and they denied the claims.
our homeowners insurance does not cover the damage because it is not
caused by storm or fire. Because of this, we request that you bring this matter
before the Maplewood City Council and request the Council to ask for a check of
our homes by the Maplewood Building Inspector to determine what structural damage
has been done to our homes, and also to make a determination of what caused this
damage.
Although the attached list is not a total of the homes which sufferred
damages, these were probably damaged most, and we request that these homes
be inspected and a written report be sent to me so that we may discuss the
results at a neighborhood meeting.
Thank you, �✓cvcJ
Carolyn terson
Bill Nsooskey 106 E. Roselawn
Clarence Osen 50 E. Roselawn
John Hackman 2011 Jackson St.
Glenn Peterson 1999 Jackson St.
John Colucci 1991 Jackson St.
Roy Bergeren 1985 Jackson St.
Paul Dusa 1955'dackson St.
Estimate:
FuSCO'S PAINTING & DECORATING
888 BLUEBILL DR. — MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA 55120 =PHONE 454 -7184
- -- -- T ` / — DATE
OWNER OR GUSTOMERs `J" 1J '�� ( e
—.4
FF
.
• or 7CL ]r' � Q c,l its -
k
1
{
f
Date 01/08/1988
1 .
1 4858 BANNING AVE WHITE BEAR LAKE MINNESOTA 55110 612. 426.6630
Page 1 'of 1
DRDSR CONTRACT
Customer
Mr. and Mrs. Paul Dues,
1955 Jackson Street
Maplewood Mn. 55117
489 -5264
Site Address
1955 Jackson Street
Maplewood Mn. 55117
489 -5264
Specifications
I. Repair and Spray texture ceiling in Kitchen and family room
$ 680.00
II Repair and re -dash stucco on west wall of garage and ! �
north wall of family room.
$ 850.00
?)am4m P14 p4&:2:pc9
ED GROSS
NAME _...
NAME G� /.1.��`?��. -.��• ;/!`-=- �- .._._.._ ..._.._.. ---.-_-.-- --'-'-- ---._..._..,�_
J ADDRESS �'� """''� ="•
ADDRESS C- �__ —!_!' .. '•^"- '��— _..._ --' __._. .__ _. ___
ZIP CITY _STAT _ ZIP _.__.__ _
CITY '1•i.�� STAT /.= __ _._ - -- •
YY'- L /r! _ 4� f� • TELEPHONE '7
TELEPHONE
J
DATE -- _ (DATE Of PLANS (START WORK. DATE IYOUR MOUIRY NO.
t /
. .fit .t� r � / � .s�••a.J...._�. _ . /� ~` =� ._-
1-710 v^c%.•a +0 SU•! •-.- -� (7E- -�-.�J ""�") �,.._�C -- -�
BIGNE T L'RE OR CO••• A•.
AY•r\V �•:G_ b.."AIYRF
DATE OF ACCEPTANCE
'' DANCE WITH THE ABOVE c r - 1 , �, E
. A - c •arc..
141-T ERIAL AND LABOR AS FlEOU14E I �¢^rCG' - ABOVE PP.LEE 5 °EC!aICAT1Ot.. A 2" Cv "-' + I. R "
SPE CItiC ^-10N£.n A ?r
the +yF T ✓' /}—
DOLLARS ISO FACTOR AIdD P.P.. HEF.-o1 A:.CF =TE7 G'J
SS
COL•n_rT'c T•i!S CONTRA:T AS SpECIriEO CAYL'zt; 11'i�.
tt • dE n - tC Pi AS O' 'TLINEC TC THE LErl
YA AS E EiLLOLSS
AI' rtN1!•Ib� O Q'r'"nl!!C IC bE aL sperilw: Al ' w Vv M be Ctvn;)'L•14d n A wJ•nn'.rR' GE
rain* aCCarD.n? tC HDtAa•d lxaallclS An) ' 8nt'iti?". w Of-351-y' ab_v -* $a L
IRGTb tivpvtl� etVa COeta will be aveoV'4d o'Nj IET� "• NNtlf� pY"S. e!A wi: DtCO'M1 a'
eehe CM'gt over and abe 1ba esarrwjE_ Ai: apree•rlt•f15 Co'lh.pen: u0Dr1 sl• cos ae•
m
ooen_ p *No, baJpld W CYIi'OI OMM' WM�N� f" llo"cl a&r O "ems taM'1'
nw.SnA . Our wWkefe we hdlE Cov"a D/
MOTE TNb pAOPOSAL MAY BE WRIO.U.WN BY US i NOT ACCEPTED WrtHn'
DA+S
AUTHORIZED SIONATORE
�t1 �IFvJRI • S AW460
POLY PAK (So SETS) 4P460 _.... _ . .. .•... -
642.1014
NO. IPAOE NO 10' PAGES
carboMes■ El
TRIP
U 4856 BANNING AVE. • WHITE BEAR LAKE MINNESOTA 55110 • 612.426.6630
t iiy.5E
x a i
.," a n
.Date 02 /01/1988 Page 1 of 1
` J , -. ORDER, CONTRACT
y'' 4 Customer.
i
Clarence Osen
50 East Roselawn'
St.Paul Mn. 55117
488- 5157
y Site Address
50 East Roselawn
St.Paul Mn. 55117
.488 -5157
specifications
I.'. Make the following repairs:
a. Damaged blocks in basement.
cost $ 425.00
b. Re -dash stuco on south side of house.
post I $ 835.00
C. Re -roof house as follows:
install 72 wide ice shield per code.
Install 22011 fiberglass shingles over existing shingles.
install new roof vents and flashing.
cost $1,625.00
Total
This bid valid for 21 days.
$2,886.00
a`
ORDER CONTRACT
Customer
Page 1 of 1
i
1 _.
i
C
Mr. and Mrs. Glen Peterson
1999 Jackson Street
Maplewood Mn 55117
489.2672
Site Address
1999 Jackson Street'
Maplewood Mn 55117 `
489.2672
Specifications
I. Repair walls and ceilings and paint as follows:
a. Move or.cover furniture need.
b. Repair nail pops and texture as need in all rooms on main
floor including hall to basement.
o. Paint all walls and ceilings with 2 coats latex paint using
owners choice of standard colors.
d. Clean up.
e. Replace furniture.
Total paint price $ 1,440.00
II Repair bath floor as follows:
a. Install 1/8" plywood underlayment.
b. Install new vinyl flooring ($60.00 material allowance)
C. clean up.
total price for bath floor $ 152.00
III Caulk cracks in laundry room floor.
Total price caulk laundry room floor $ 35.00
Total
14 85 . 8 BANNING AVE. WHITE BEAR LAKE• MINNESOTA 55110 612.426.6630
This bid valid for 21 days.
$ 1,627.00
Date 01/08/1988
Name t'r_ t1fig 41nriaffrein. ,
Address 1cts+, tortr ^_^ r4 t ni+touobtl . n.
nit a� I v w
Phone No J, Work No
Job Address r r ` , . wmiee r..w" sorer, Drywall
.:.,k;,,,,,;,,,,;,,,,,, .;,. •. ,..,.... .;;1,I :....IS Winthrop So.
871 Edgerton Ave.
1•Date lit"i _16 e _19Aft , 14 •� W r `^R fMrs rSl. Paul, Minnows 88119
1 Phone: (812) 77 &8200:' ' f.,i ,j
1 i 1 e .
Dew 6ir: ' t ' PROPOSAL r Pnen.: (812) rit -2968"
r
-The undersigned proposes to furnish ill materials and perform all labor necessary to complete the following:
Coiling 0a;.mro -- Wot:k"duo 'to road conabrtiotion. iiitolten. livinRroo 'rattlroom; �
(1-.n. ball. castor b3droom. back beldroon, feyAlyrooine "Retxtir all d to boilin:
nn ixmc and (/rarl e. biro ooilinre and Txtint or elrav t0Y tltr0 (va "finis' —
cont In tito Dal .oithor uay) a R)] waIi.a floors, furnituro cct. wi?.). 1••• uaehod
an I r voro t Will) work in in Tror•onc. Tiro of cotalAoticm 1-•2 days.
tr, ,,. .t .. IrIV raR1' ^ ^rl' 1 Yr1nr frbla clat0 of CbmTlletibn, A^•alnnt tlo1.`nraD':in . L �''. • *;.Cl.
alt W0C14lallnhj. .
Tor-pup 0 cloltn Ta9ment in till upon oomltl.otione
Al l of the above work to be comp) fed in a substantial and workmanlike manner for the sum of Dollars
v n huri(1rucl 0, ovonby t^ivc iIf100 ($ 77x'•00 )
All jobs to be paid upon completion of work unless otherwise written in this contract, 1%96 per month
charged on accounts over 90 days. , This proposal only good, for $0 calender days. _''•
Any alteration or deviation from the above specifications involving extra cost of material or labor will only
be executed upon written . orders for same, and will become an extra charge over the sum mentioned in this
contract. All agreements must be made in writing.
The Contractor agrees to carry Workmen's Compensation and Public Liability Insurance, also to pay all
Sales Taxes, Old Age Benefit and Unemployment Compensation Taxes upon the material and labor Earn-
fished under this contract,, as required by the United States Government and the State in which this work L
performed.
" .... OF LIEN:' ,, ... . .
1 "(a) Persons or companies furnishing labor or materials for the improvement of real property may enforce
alien upon the improved land it they are not paid for their contributions, even if such parties have no direct
contractual relationship with the owner; `
j "(b) Minnesota law permits the owner to withhold from his contractor so much of the contract price as
i •.;r Islay be necessary to meet the demands of all other lien claimants, pay directly such liens and deduct the cost
thereof from the contract price, of withhold amounts from his contractor until the expiration of 90 days
from the completion of such improvement unless the contractor furnishes to the owner waivers of claims for
mechanic's liens signed b persons who, furnished any labor or material for the improvement and who pro-
i vided the owner with timely notice." Respectfully submitted
-' -
s. By Stop on 0. Robidoau
,ACCEPTANCE
You are hereby authorized to furnish all materials and labor required to complete the work mentioned W
the above proposal, for which the undersigned agrees to pay the amount mentioned in Said proposal, and ac-
cording to the terms thereof.,
Date 18
1 Office Copy - White fnviallers Copy • Yellow Customers Copy • Pink
Name "" roltn " 02322,11
Address 2011 Jaclm0n ^t. 1":nrt1olrlo•1e :'n.
Phone No. 'C7_9 "r? Work No.
Job Address
SP G/�\
Iii tatntins. Texture Serar, Drywaa
16 Winthrop So.
871 Edgerton Ave.
G� 15
Date gV P1 1`M— St. Paul, Minnesota 56119
Phone: (612) 778.6200
3' PROPOSAL Phone: (612) 771.29W
Dear_ Sir:
' - The undersigned proposes to furnish all materials and perform all labor necessary to complete the following:
Coilinr; and !•lull ttac,n^o: ilorl; dao to road conotructlon. ; itc t %at, 13.v inr`0o::,
hall., 3 bod"001a f -u13 cicinota. zol al l , rr • `a „)
Prim (x`i"in a - or nyTom toXturci (ymir Owin1 •. C1, ^, ip ia:, ^n 1. .1,
uny) a Pe-bit cOl walla — color to n_rttcli cxictin�e A ll vni 1r,, f lc,urr., % r ^n t;n
act* will i- and c ovorod while wort: in in rro
All 9,f�the ooa)palgyed iota ivu
and workmanlike manner for the sum of
Dollars
f� All jobs to be paid upon completion of work unless otherwise written in this contract. 1 per month
f charged on accounts over 90 days. This proposal only good for 30 calendar days.
N. Any alteration or deviation from the above specifications involving extra cost of material or labor will only
be executed upon written orders for same, and will become an extra charge over the sum mentioned in this
contract. All agreements must be made in writing.
The Contractor agrees to carry Workmen's Compensation and Public Liability Insurance, also to ps.y all
Sales Taxes, Old Age Benefit and Unemployment Compensation Taxes upon the material and labor biro-
ished under this contract, as required by the United States Government and the State in which this work is
performed.
NOTICE OF LIEN:
"(a) Persons or companies furnishing labor or materials for the improvement of real property may enforce
alien upon the improved land if they are not paid for their contributions, even if such parties have no direct
,.contractual relationship with the owner;
"(b) Minnesota law permits the owner to withhold from his contractor so much of the contract price as
may be necessary to meet the demands of all other lien claimants, pay directly such liens and deduct the cost
thereof from the contract price, or withhold amounts from his contractor until the expiration of 90 days
from the completion of such improvement unless the contractor furnishes to the owner waivers of claims for
mechanic's liens sighed by persons who furnished any labor or material for the improvement and who pro-
vided the owner with timely notice. Respectfully submitted,
By Utoliuon Ge 1 :ouuc au
;•,:.: _; ;..,,..,� , ........ ACCEPTANCE
You are hereby authorized to furnish all materiels and labor required to complete the work mentioned in
the above proposal, for which the undersigned agree to pay the amount mentioned in said proposal, and ac-
cording to the terms thereof.
Date 19
Office Copy • White , Installers Copy • Yellow Customers Copy • Pink
tll` Rik
ESH - IR
. - 4858 BANNING AVE. • WHITE BEAR LAKE. MINNESOTA 55110 612. 426.8630
�Yti!%W
Lr �# 4"'kl,�' �..( ma } I r i:. r '�•
r,•. ((,Date 02/01/1988' Page 1 of 1
ORDER CONTRACT
Customer
;Ray Miller
'142 East Roselawn
St.Paul mri: 55117
489 -5273
Site Address
142 East Roselawn
st.paul mn. 55117
489 -5273
Specifications
I. Repair crack in hall ceiling and re paint hall and living room
ceiling
total cost of material and labor $ 480.00
PROPOSAL
supplement
Douglas Aleshire
4M BANNIN. AVE. • WWM BEAR LAKE • MINNESOTA 66110 • 612/426.8630
w' C/a Cr
��.... J .- (7
je
60, eo
ation or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs, will be executed only upon written orders. and will
Any aitei charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes. accidents or delays beyond our
become Owner to carry lire. for nado and other neces n sary i uranCeiupdn above work. Workmen's Compensation and PubiiG
control. become at on or
Liability Insurance on above work to be taken out by
Re$Psctfully submitted
hereby accepted. You are au th o r i zed to do the work
The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are
as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above.
Accepted
Date
signature
-signature
�� &r
/
16 y "F hs o..._
IR y
A„
,• any•
� �59 -o�3v
�:.
i ;
3
j
i
Agenda Number
Action by Council:
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Man End.orsed..._.. —..�._
Y er 9 "�.° c a 2
Modified
RE: FUNDING OF COMBINED SEWER SEPARATION Rejected
Date _.e_
DATE: November 21, 1988
INTRODUCTION
The Suburban Rate Authority has requested that all member cities adopt the
attached resolution which opposes any State funding for separation of combined
sewer in Minneapolis and St. Paul.
BACKGROUND
Sewer separation has been a topic of discussion for a number of years, and in
1983 a program was worked out that included substantial federal funding. It
appears that $49 million of that federal money will not be forthcoming and that
there will be a request for the State to pick up the tab.
DISCUSSION
The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) has also taken a position
on this, which was adopted (and supported by Maplewood) at the November 3rd
Policy meeting. This position does not necessarily conflict with the Suburban
Rate Authority's, but it is more wait and see.
OPTIONS
The City of Maplewood has three options:
1) adopt the Resolution as proposed by the Suburban Rate Authority;
2) adopt a resolution using language similar to AMM's; or
3) take no action at this time.
MAM:kaz
Attachments
SUBURBAN
RATE
AUTHORITY
MEMBERS
BLOOMINGTON
BROOKLYN PARK
BURNSVILLE
MEMORANDUM
CHAMPLIN
CIRCLE PINES
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
DEEPHAVEN
TO:
SRA Member.Cit Managers and Clerks
Y ana g
EDEN PRAIRIE
EDINA
FRIDLEY
FROM:
William D.. Schoell
GREENWOOD
HASTINGS
Chairman
HOPKINS
LAUDERDALE
MAPLE PLAIN
DATE:
October 27, 1988
MAPLEWOOD
MINNETONKA
MINNETRISTA
RE:
Funding of Combined Sewer Separation Programs
NEW
in St. Paul and Minneapolis
p
NORTH RTH ST, PAAUL UL
ST,
ORONO
..
OSSEO
PLYMOUTH
RICHFIELD
At its quarterly meeting on October 19 the Suburban Rate
ROB LE
Authority
Board of Directors unanimous)
Y y passed a reso-
ROBVILLE
SAVAGE
lution
urging member cities to contact their State
ST. LOUIS PARK
elected
representatives regarding the funding of the
P 9 9 9
SHAKOPEE
SHOREVIEW
Combined
Sewer Separation Program in the Cities of St.
SPRING PARK
Paul and Minneapolis. The Board recommends that cities
p
VADNAIS HEIGHTS
WAYZATA
adopt a
resolution along the lines of the enclosed model.
WEST ST. PAUL
WOODLAND
In 1983 and after the Suburban Rate Authority was very
active in working with the MPCA and others to develop a
method of funding Combined Sewer Separation projects in
the two core cities. The purpose of SRA participation
Was; of course, to safeguard insofar as possible the
resources of its members, who had installed their own
separated sewers. At that time EPA was threatening to
shut off, all hookups in the Metropolitan area until the
problem was resolved. Such action would have landed
particularly hard upon SRA members who are experiencing
growth. After many meetings over a period of approxi-
mately two years, and appearances in the legislature, it
passed a bill providing for a loan and grant program
which would enable St. Paul and Minneapolis to complete
their sewer separations by 1996. The scheme settled upon
by all of the parties included a combination of federal
grants, no interest state loans to be repaid beginning in
1996, state grants and self -help. In the waning hours of
the last legislature, two provisions were inserted in the
appropriations bill which repealed the provisions re-
quiring repayment of the loans. These r ^!Tn9T, ,S vaL p f-
heard by any committee of the legisla; ure, exc, pt rL
conference committee on the appropriations bill. In
2000 FIRST BANK PLACE WEST • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 • (612) 333 -0543
SRA Member Cities
October 27, 1988
Page 2
effect, the repealer forgives approximately $32 million
in loans to the two cities.
Another more important matter, at least in terms of
dollars, is the abolition of the federal grant program.
It now appears that the federal share will be reduced by
approximately $49 million from that expected when the
funding plan was developed.
The legislature will have to face the problem this
session. The Board anticipates that the two cities will
ask the legislature to make up the $49 million in federal
money which will not be forthcoming. The Board feels it
is patently unfair for the residents of the state to
pay for the replacement and separation of sewers in St.
Paul and Minneapolis. The SRA Board feels that it is
imperative that we speak up. In addition to passing the
resolution or something similar, elected officials should
make sure that their state legislative delegation under -
stands.the problem.
I would appreciate it if you will provide a copy of the
resolution, should your council decide to adopt it, to me
or to SRA counsel. A brief report on what other steps
have been taken would assist the SRA Board at its January
meeting in determining what more to do on this subject.
Enclosure
i
0060ltO1.bl8
cc: Directors
RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS, the Suburban Rate Authority has assisted the Metro-
politan Council, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the
Minnesota Legislature in formulating a program for funding
combined sewer separation in the cities of Minneapolis and St.
Paul; and
WHEREAS, such sewer separation is required by law and by
contract, and is otherwise desirable; and
WHEREAS, expected federal funding for the program has been
cancelled and replacement funding must be identified; and
WHEREAS, most cities in the seven county metropolitan area
have built separate sanitary and storm sewer systems, principally
through local funding; and
WHEREAS, the cities of St. Paul and Minneapolis have ob-
tained legislation forgiving approximately $32 million in sepa-
ration loans from the state;
NOW, THEREFORE, the council of the City of ,
does by this resolution state that it is opposed to the spreading
of the replacement funding upon the State Treasury, and that it
believes the most equitable resolution is for the affected cities
to themselves provide that funding.
0060se01.bl8
ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES
POLICIES AND
LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS
1989 -1990
SECTION IV -E COMBINED SEWERS - SEPARATION
The three communities of Minneapolis, St. Paul and South St. Paul still have a
significant amount of combined waste water and storm water sewers which create
overflows of untreated waste water into the Mississippi River during heavy rains
and storm water runoff periods. These cities have over many years been
progressing with sewer separation projects paid for primarily through local tax
levies. The Federal and State governments are pressing the issue of meeting
certain water quality standards in the Mississippi River consistently which
apparently cannot be done until separation is complete. The State has provided
additional funding since the 1985 Legislative Session to help pay for the speed
up.
IT HAS BEEN AMM POLICY THAT IF THE STATE GOVERNMENT CONTINUES TO PURSUE THE
ACCELERATED COMBINED SEWER SEPARATION PROGRAM IN THE THREE CITIES, THAT IT ALSO
CONTINUE TO PROVIDE FUNDING TO ENSURE THAT NEITHER LOCAL PROPERTY TAXES NOR
METROPOLITAN SANITARY SEWER COSTS ARE INCREASED DUE TO THE ACCELERATED BUILD
EFFORT. THE PROGRAM TO DATE HAS PROCEEDED ACCORDING TO THAT POLICY.
CONSIDERABLE FEDERAL MONEY HAS ALSO BEEN AVAILABLE TO ASSIST IN THE SEPARATION
PROJECT IN THE PAST. THE AMM UNDERSTANDS THAT FEDERAL FUNDS WILL BE CUT
DRAMATICALLY IN FUTURE YEARS, REQUIRING A FINANCIAL RESTRUCTURING OF THE PROGRAM.
AS THE CSO ISSUE HAS SIGNIFICANT IMPLICATIONS, BOTH FOR STATE FINANCES AND FOR
DEVELOPMENT IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA, THE AMM REQUESTS THAT ITS BOARD OF
DIRECTORS HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW AND COMMENT ON ANY SIGNIFICANT CHANGE
IN THE FINANCING OR IMPLEMENTATION PLANS FOR THE SEPARATION PROJECT.
Agenda Number
Action by Counoil:
Endorsed _—......,„ ....
TO: Mayor and City Council Modified.. -_._
Rejecte
FROM: City Manager �� Date v
RE: CITY HALL ARCHITECTS
DATE: November 21, 1988
INTRODUCTION
At the September 12, 1988 meeting the City Council authorized the City Manager
to send out requests for proposals to architectural firms for an addition to
the current City Hall.
DISCUSSION
Requests for proposals were sent to seven firms and five responses were
submitted to the City. A committee composed of Council Member George
Rossbach, Staff Services Coordinator, Gail Blackstone, Public Works Director,
Ken Haider, and the City Manager, Mike McGuire, reviewed all the proposals and
decided that two firms, T.K.D.A. and Architectural Alliance should be further
considered.
On November 17, 1988 these two firms were invited in for an interview and
based on this and the proposal, it is the unanimous opinion of the committee
that the City contract with T.K.D.A. for architectural services for an
addition to City Hall.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize thelMavor and City Manager
to enter into a contract for architectural services with T.K.D.A. for an
addition to City Hall.
MAM:kaz