Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1988 12-12 City Council Packet
AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, December 12, 1988 Municipal Administration Building Meeting 88 - 29 (A) CALL TO ORDER (B) ROLL CALL (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Meeting No. 88 - 21 (September 26, 1988) 2. Meeting No. 88 - 24 (October 10, 1988) (D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA (E) CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Claims 2. Budget Transfer - Finance Department 3. Final Acceptance: Projects 86 -11, 86 -21, 87 -10, 87 -37 and 88 -06 4. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Joint Use Rental Acceptance S. Correct Resolution: Sterling Street 6. Authorization For Part -Time Police Officer: PERA Coverage (F) PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M., Lower Afton and McKnight Road a. Plan Amendment (4 Votes) b. Conditional Use Permit C. Traffic Study Request 2. 7:45 P.M., Gervais Avenue: a. Plan Amendment (4 Votes) b. Conditional Use Permit 3. 8:40 P.M., Street and Alley Vacation: Walter Street (4 Votes) 4. 8:50 P.M., CUP Termination: 1060 N. Sterling St. (Montessii Day Care) (G) AWARD OF BIDS (H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Walter Street Project 84 -14 (4 Votes) 2. Conditional Use Permit: Larpenteur Avenue and Sylvan (St. Paul Water Utility) 3. Code Amendment: Abandoned or Junk Vehicles (2nd Reading) 4. Cypress St: Knollwood Circle (Goff Homes) a. Preliminary Plat b. Rezoning 5. Authorization To Hire Permanent Part -Time Clerk - Typist (I) NEW BUSINESS 1. Parking Space Authorization: 2080 Rice Street (Schroeder Milk Company) 2. 3. 4. Street Plan Revision: West of the Mall Motor Fuel Station Moratorium Rezoning Initiation: White Bear and 11th Avenues (Amoco) (J) VISITOR PRESENTATIONS (K) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. ('L) ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS (M) ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, September 26, 1988 Municipal Administration Building Meeting No. 88 -21 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M., by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of Meeting No. 88 -15 (July 11, 1988) Councilmember Anderson moved that the Minutes of Meeting No. 88 -15 (July 11 1988) be approved as submitted. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 2. Minutes of Meeting No. 88 -16 (July 25, 1988) Mayor Greavu moved that the Minutes of Meeting No. 88 -16 (July 25, 1988) be approved as corrected. Page 15, Item H -21 Delete "bids ", insert '"best proposal." Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 3. Minutes of Meeting No. 88 -20 (September 12, 1988) Councilmember Anderson moved that the Minutes of Meeting No. 88 -20 (September 12 1988) be approved as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian, and Rossbach Councilmember Juker abstained. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. Deck Setback 2. National Conference of Cities 3. Meeting with Planning Commission and Park and Recreation Commission before Consultant Hired 4. Group Home 5. Newspaper Advertising 9/26 6. Flags 7. Walter Street 8. Add I -3, Property Tax Reform Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Council removed Item E -4 to become Item I -4. Mayor Greavu moved, seconded by Councilmember Rossbach, Ayes - all, to Consent Aeenda as recommended: 1. Approval of Claims Approved the claims as follows: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 713,516.68 Checks #8134 - $8182 Dated 09 -01 -88 thru 09 -12 -88 $ 66,197.57 $ 779,714.25 UAVT?(1T T . $ 155,684.07 155,827.58 $ 30,018.55 29.919.21 $ 371,449.41 $1,151,163.66 Checks #4047 - #4171 Dated 09 -26 -88 Total per attached voucher /check register Payroll Checks Period Ending 08 -26 -88 Payroll Checks Period Ending 09 -09 -88 Payroll Deductions Period ending 08 -26 -88 Payroll Deductions Period ending 09 -09 -88 Total Payroll GRAND TOTAL 2. Time Extension: Miggler Addition the Approval of a one -year time extension for the eight -lot Miggler Addition preliminary plat, subject to the September 14, 1987, conditions of approval, amended as follows: 1. Submittal of a 66- foot -wide right -of -way easement to the City Engineer for the extension of proposed Miggler Drive to Gervais Avenue. The applicant shall pay all costs for acquiring this easement, including any costs for acquisition by condemnation. This easement shall not encroach upon the City's property abutting to the east. 2. Submittal of a signed developer's agreement with required surety for required public improvements, including the construction of the street, sanitary sewer and water main extensions to Gervais Avenue and to guar- antee removal of the truck farm structures that are in conflict with any setback requirements. - 2 - 9/26 The City shall pay the cost - differential between a local sanitary sewer and the eighteen -inch diameter interceptor line that is planned to be routed along proposed Miggler Drive. The applicant's surety shall not include this cost - differential. 3. The water main to be constructed in proposed Miggler Drive shall be looped to the water main in Gervais Avenue. 4. Delete Lot Two, Block Two and renumber Lots Three through Five to Lots Two through Four. Lot One, Block Two shall be enlarged to include the west 185± feet of the former Lot Two. The former Lot Three shall be enlarged to include the easterly 115± feet of the former Lot Two. 5. Phasing of the plat may be permitted provided: a. Development is limited to Lots One, Two and Three of Blocks One and Lots One and Two of Block Two (as revised in condition four) until street and water main are extended to Gervais Avenue. The area not being developed in the first phase shall be shown as an outlot. b. A developer's agreement shall be submitted with the required surety for all public improvements needed to serve the first phase and to guar- antee the removal of any truck farm structures in violation of setback requirements. This agreement shall include the submission of a temporary 108 -foot diameter cul -de -sac easement to the City and construction of a 100 -foot diameter temporary cul -de -sac. The bulb of the cul -de -sac shall be constructed to the east line of Lot Two, (as revised in condition four), Block Two. c. Fire flows in proposed Miggler Drive must meet the fire code. 6. Miggler Drive shall be a 66- foot -wide right -of -way. 7. City Engineer approval of final grading, drainage and utility plans. These plans must include an eighteen -inch sanitary sewer line within proposed Miggler Drive. This sewer shall be deep enough to accommo- date the remainder of this interceptor line to be constructed from Barclay Street and Highway 36. 8. The east /west portion of Miggler Drive shall be renamed "Brooks Avenue ". 9. The north /south portion of "Miggler Drive" shall be renamed "Chambers Street ". 3. Conditional Use Permit Renewal: Harmony School Approved the renewal of the conditional use permit for five years for a community education and day -care facility at 2650 White Bear Avenue, subject to the original conditions of approval. 4. Home Occupation Renewal: 1161 Lealand Road Discussed as Item I -4. - 3 - 9/26 5. Renewal of Insurance Contracts Approved that the existing one -year contracts for employee insurance be renewed with Blue Cross /Blue Shield, Group Health, Share, Employee Benefit Plan, Schools Insurance Fund, and Commercial Life. 6. Budget Transfer: Planning Consultant Approved the transfer of $9,000 from the contingency account to the Community Development Department budget for a planning consultant to edit, reduce the size and evaluate the need for further changes in the City's Comprehensive Plan. 7. Request for No Parking Signs - Larpenteur Avenue Resolution No. 88 - 9 - 152 WHEREAS, the north side of Larpenteur Avenue from Century to McKnight is striped for bikes and pedestrians; WHEREAS, significant parking occurs in this area causing safety concerns identified by the Maplewood Police Department. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, CITY COUNCIL that Ramsey County is requested to establish a "No Parking" zone on the north side of Larpenteur Avenue from Century to McKnight. 8. Price and Ruth - Stop Sign Approved the placement of stop signs on both sides of Price and Ruth. 9. Accept Resignation of John Prey - H.R.C. and H.R.A. Accepted the resignation of John Prey from the Human Relations Commission and Housing and Redevelopment Authority and thank Mr. Prey for services. 10. Authorization to Fill Part Time Position Authorized to fill the permanent part -time position for the City Clerk and Deputy Registrar Department. 11. Resolution - Uniform Policy - Cable Companies Resolution No. 88 - 9 - 153 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood, in conjunction with others comprising the Ramsey- Washington Counties Suburban Cable Commission ( "RWCSCC "), has been requested by the Grantee of their similar Cable Communications System Fran- chises ( "Franchise "), to evaluate issues relating to the potential transfer of the access operations; and WHEREAS, it is the concern of this City Council that in this process all cable company personnel or representatives (including its parent or af- filiates) conduct any communications with regard to this matter with the City Council as a whole and not with individual members of the City Council or ad- ministration; and - 4 - 9/26 WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of all of those participating in the transfer process that all communications be public to avoid any sort of misunderstanding and unwarranted accusations that would otherwise develop either against the City or any of its Council - members or representatives; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined a policy must be adopted that will be consistently followed by its Councilmembers and staff and with the understanding that Councilmembers of other communities will likewise adhere to a similar policy. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota: 1. It is the policy of the Mayor and City Council that all communica- tions regarding any matter of the cable communications system proposed transfer of access operations shall be directed to the City Council as a whole and not to an individual Council or staff member. It is not intended by this that communications by a constituent acting in a private capacity as a constituent will be prohibited. 2. It is requested that the Chairperson of the RWCSCC will request from the Grantee of the Franchise that they provide a list desig- nating each person who will be the official speakers or representa- tives on behalf of them, and further, that the RWCSCC shall provide to the City Council from time to time, a report advising it of the names of any such official speakers or representatives. 3. That a copy of this resolution be forwarded by the City Clerk to the Chairperson of the RWCSCC and to the Clerk of each of the cities who may be forming the same cable communications system. 4. The RWCSCC is hereby authorized to distribute a copy of this Resolution to the cable company as part of the access transfer process. 5. This Resolution will be effective beginning with the day of its passage and continue until an ordinance granting a transfer of the access operations to the RWCSCC is adopted. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M., Conditional Use Permit Revision (Mn. D.O.T. Research Building) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Minnesota Department of Transportation to delete a condition that states "A building permit shall not be issued until the City has signed a contract for the construction of Gervais Avenue." b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. - 5 - 9/26 d. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following were heard: Melville O'Reilly, 2411 Kennard James Glander, 1572 Gervais e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. f. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 88 -9- 154 WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation initiated a con- ditional use permit to construct a laboratory and research center on the following- described properties in Section 10, T. 29, R. 22; 1. Subject to street the W 365 ft. of the E 39 acres of N 1/2 of SW 1/4 lying N of Sth 36 -118; and 2. Ex Northern Pacific RY R/W & Ex E 39 acres; part of N 1/2 of SW 1/4 lying N of N L of Hwy 36 & lying Ely of a L run NEly from intersection of E L or W 19 acres & N L of Sd Hwy 36 to a point 260 feet S of N L of Sd SW 1/4 & 140 ft. E of E L of Sd W 19 acres Th E Par with N L of Sd SW 1/4 to Wly L of Sd N P Ry R/W Th NEly to N L of Sd SW 1/4. The revision would change Condition Two to read: 2. A building permit shall not be issued until the City has ordered the construction of Gervais Avenue. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This revision to the conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on September 19, 1988. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said permit be approved. 2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on September 26, 1988. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described conditional use permit revision be approved on the basis of the following findings -of -fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the City's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detri- mental to the public health, safety or general welfare. - 6 - 9/26 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area prop- erties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1." Adherence to the site plan, date - stamped 1988, unless a change is approved by the City's Community Design Review Board. 2. A building permit shall not be issued until the City has ordered the construction of Gervais Avenue. 3. There shall be no odors or noises from this site that are detectable at the east property line other than those normally associated with the ingress and egress of trucks and cars. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 2. 7:10 P.M., Gervais Avenue a. Sewer Plan Amendment (4 Votes) b. Public Improvement Project (4 Votes) c. No Parking Designation 1. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for the public hearing regarding an amendment to the sewer plan, the improvement of Gervais Avenue, and for no parking on Gervais between Barclay and Kennard Streets. 2. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. - 7 - 9/26 3. Assistant City Engineer Irish presented the specifics of the proposal. 4. Larry Bohr, Consultant from Toltz, King, Duval and Anderson, presented the specifics of the proposal. 5. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following voiced their opinions: Jim Glander, 1572 Gervais Jeff Cosolis, 2408 Barclay LeRay Tuil, 2352 Barclay Resident at 1571 Gervais 6. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. 7. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 88 -9 -155 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the sewer element of the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan to reroute a planned future trunk line, northwest from Barclay Street and Highway 36 through the Miggler property (north of Gervais Avenue and west of Gerten Pond) to Highway 61 rather than due west along Highway 36 to Highway 61. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 19, 1988, to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Planning Commission recom- mended to the City Council that said plan amendment be approved. 2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on September 26, 1988. The Council considered reports and recommen- dations from the Planning Commission and City Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The Highway 36 alignment would be more costly because it would be constructed in the frontage road. The Miggler alignment would be built with a new street and the costs shared with the Miggler development. 2. There is already a sewer in the frontage road to serve adjacent properties. Putting the sewer through the Miggler site would serve abutting properties as well as relieve the lift station. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. - 8 - 9/26 b. Public Improvement Project 1. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following expressed their opinions: Jeff Cosolis, 2408 Barclay Resident at 1579 Gervais Melville O'Reilly, 2411 Kennard Lorraine Reimers, 1555 Gervais Mark Terry, 1478 Gervais Joseph Waters, 2393 Hazelwood 2. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. 3. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: :: .. WHEREAS, after due notice of public hearing on the construction of roadway with concrete curb and gutter and associated improvements on Gervais Avenue, English Street to approximately 1200 feet east, City Project 88 -14, a hearing on said improvement in accordance with the notice duly given was duly held on September 26, 1988, and the Council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That it is advisable, expedient and necessary that the City of Maplewood construct roadway with concrete curb and gutter and associated improvements on Gervais Avenue, English Street to approximately 1200 feet east, City Project 88 -14, as de- scribed in the notice of hearing thereof, and orders the same to be made. 2. The City Engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifica- tions for the making of said improvement. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. c. No Parking Designation 1. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following voiced their opinions: Resident at 1486 Gervais 2. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing 3. Councilmember Juker moved that Staff investigate the question of legality of parking signs on Gervais. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. - 9 - 9/26 3. 7:20 P.M., 2829 -47 White Bear Avenue a. Plan Amendment (4 Votes) b. Rezoning (4 Votes) 1. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding approval of a plan amendment from LSC, limited service commercial to SC, Service Commercial, and approval of a rezoning from LBC limited business commercial and BC (M) business commercial modified to BC, business commercial. 2. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. 3. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. 4. Gene Peterson, the developer, spoke on behalf of the proposal. 5. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. No one was heard. 6. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. 7. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 88 - 9 - 157 WHEREAS, GP -BAJR, Inc., initiated an amendment to the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan from LSC to SC for the following- described properties: i 1. Ex W 1685 ft the S 100 ft of N 405 ft of part of SW 1/4 W of White Bear Avenue. 2. Ex W 1685 ft the S 100 ft of N 505 ft of part of SW 1/4 W of White Bear Avenue 3. Ex N 505 ft and ex W 1685 ft part of SW 1/4 N of Radatz Ave and W of White Bear Ave. All in Section 2, Township 29, Range 22 These properties are more commonly described as 2829 -47 White Bear Avenue. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 1, 1988, to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said plan amendment be approved. - 10 - 9/26 2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on September 26, 1988. The Council considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. White Bear Avenue is a heavily traveled street, which is conducive to service commercial uses. 2. The property to the north is designated SC. 3. The Radatz Avenue neighborhood would be buffered by the LBC zone to the west of the site. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. 8. Councilmember Anderson _introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: r WHEREAS, GP -BAJR, Inc., initiated a rezoning from LBC and BC(M) to BC for the following described property: 1. Ex W 1685 It the S 100 ft of N 405 ft of part of SW 1/4 W of White Bear Avenue 2. Ex W 1685 It the S 100 ft of N 505 ft of part of SW 1/4 W of White Bear Avenue 3. Ex N 505 ft and ex W 1685 ft part of SW 1/4 N of Radatz Ave. and W of White Bear Avenue All in Section 2, Township 29, Range 22 These properties are more commonly described as 2829 -47 White Bear Avenue. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on August 1 and September 19, 1988. The Planning Commission recom- mended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on September 26, 1988, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written state- ments. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: - 11 - 9/26 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and con- veniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. 9. Councilmember Rossbach requested staff to contact Ramsey County to request a traffic study for signalization at Radatz and White Bear Avenue. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 10. Councilmember Juker moved that Staff investi west corner of Radatz and Wh;tp Rpnr Aupn„p r„ T Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 4 7 :30 P.M., Conditional Use Permit Termination (Sbarro's Game Room) a. Mayor Greavu moved to convene the meeting for a public hearing to ter- minate the conditional use permit for a game room at Sbarro, the Italian Eatery Restaurant at the Maplewood Mall as requested by the owners. b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. 5 c. Mayor Greavu moved termination of th at Sbarro, The Italian Eatery Restaurant nditional use Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 7:40 P.M., Driveway Variance - 1377 Belmont a. Mayor Greavu the b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. c. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the proposal - 12 - 9/26 d. Mr. James Welter, 1377 Belmont Lane, the applicant, spoke on behalf of the proposal. e. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following were heard: Stanley Baligrodzki, 1369 E. Belmont Lane Resident at 1383 E. Belmont Lane Shirley Baligrodzki, 1369 E. Belmont Lane f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Juker moved to deny the variance as based on the Staff report and because Mr. Welter crea Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. G. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Southlawn Avenue Project 85 -17 a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. ter b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: r; , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Danner, Inc., in the amount of $442,947.02 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of Southlawn Avenue, Beam Avenue to County Road D, City Project 85 -17, and the proper City officials are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract, after final MSA plan approval and com- pletion of right -of- way /easement acquisition, with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Goff's Maplewood Third Addition a. Variation b. Final Plat 1. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. 2. Bruce Hilger, representing Goff's Homes,,spoke on behalf of the proposal. 3. Councilmember Rossbach moved to deny the variation from the Platting Code. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - Councilmembers Bastian, Juker and Rossbach - 13 - 9/26 Nays - Mayor Greavu, Councilmember Anderson. 4. Councilmember Juker moved to approve the final plat of Goff's Mapleview Third Addition. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 5. Councilmember Juker reauested Staff review t Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Regional Railroad Authority - Appointment to N.E. Corridor Task Force. a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson and Mayor John Greavu to t Seconded by Councilmember Juker H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (Continued) e. Ayes - Councilmember Juker use Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Rossbach abstained. 2. Code Amendment: Setback to Residential Districts (4 Votes) a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Rossbach moved to refer the proposed ordinance back to the Staff for further investigation. Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Juker and Rossbach Nays - Councilmembers Anderson and Bastian. I. NEW BUSINESS (Continued) 1. Regional Railroad Authority - Appointment to N.E. Corridor Task Force a. Councilmember Bastian moved to waive the Rules of Procedures to reconsider the previous vote. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. b. Councilmember Bastian Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. - 14 - e Rossbach and Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Juker Mayor Greavu and Councilmember Rossbach abstained. 9/26 2. T.H. 61 Frontage Road, North of County Road C (Petition) a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Rossbach moved to refer the petition back to the applicant as it does not appear to be in order. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 3. Property Tax Reform a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Mayor Greavu moved authorization up to $2000.00 from the Contingency Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 4. Home Occupation Renewal - 1161 Leland Road a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Juker moved renewal of the conditi tions or five vears, subiect to Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None. - K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Deck Setback a. Councilmember Bastian moved to refer to Staff what changes in the ordinances would have to be made to allow open wooden decks to observe pipeline setbacks. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 2. National Conference of Cities a. Councilmember Bastian requested authorization to attend the National Conference of Cities. b. Councilmember Anderson moved to approve Councilmember Bastian attending the National Conference of Cities. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 3. Meetings a. Councilmember Anderson moved that Council meet with the Planning Commission and Park and Recreation Commission before meeting with the consultant. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. - 15 - 9/26 4. Group Homes a. Councilmember Anderson stated he read in the St. Paul papers that most group homes be moved to the suburbs. b. Councilmember Anderson moved to investigate the Dossibilitv of the Con Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Juker and Rossbach Councilmember Bastian abstained. 5. Newspaper Advertising a. Councilmember Rossbach referred the question of what type of advertising can be in a city newspaper to the legal staff. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Aves - all. 6. Flags a. Councilmember Rossbach stated the flags in the Council Chamber should be displayed more prominently. 7. Walter Street a. Councilmember Juker questioned the status of Walter Street being con- structed to Frost Avenue. b. Staff stated a feasibility study is being prepared. 8. Crestview Drive a. Mayor Greavu requested Staff to notify the person who is building a house at the end of Crestview Drive that he has to be 50 feet from the creek. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS None. M. ADJOURNMENT 9:25 P.M. City Clerk - 16 - 9/26 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, October 10, 1988 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 88 - 24 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Meeting No. 88 - 17 (August 4, 1988) Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 88 - 17 (August 4, 1988) as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 2. Meeting No. 88 - 18 (August 8, 1988) Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 88 - 18 (August 8, 1988) as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Juker. Councilmember Rossbach abstained. 3. Meeting No. 88 - 19 (August 18, 1988) Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 88 - 19 (August 18, 1988) as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian & Juker. Councilmember Rossbach abstained. 4. Meeting No. 88 - 20A (August 22, 1988) Councilmember Juker moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 88 - 20A (August 22, 1988) as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 10 /10 5. Meeting No. 88 - 20 (August 22, 1988) Councilmember Juker moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 88 -20 (August 22, 1988) as submitted. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 6. Reconvened Meeting of No. 88 - 20 (August 29, 1988) Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 88 - 20 (August 29, 1988) as submitted. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. Cable 2. Lake Phalen 3. Community Center 4. Curbside Recycling 5. Manager's Meeting 6. Historical Society 7. Legislature Contract - A.M.M. 8. Local Action Blueprint 9. Add I -5, Albert Olson Seconded by Councilmember Bastian E. CONSENT AGENDA Council removed Item E -8 to become I -6. Mayor Greavu Ayes - all. seconded by Councilmember 1. Approval of Claims Approved payment of the following claims: ian. Aves - ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 317,572.01 Checks #8183 - #8265 Dated 09 -13 -88 thru 09 -30 -88 $ 133,677.13 Checks #4180 - #4310 Dated 10 -10 -88 $ 451,249.14 Total per attached voucher /check register PAYROLL: $ 172,273.93 Payroll Checks $ 7,566.85 Payroll Deductions $ 179,840.78 Total Payroll $ 631,089.92 GRAND TOTAL - 2 - 10 /10 2. Increase in Ambulance Rates Resolution No. 88 - 10 - 160 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is authorized to impose reasonable charges for emergency and paramedic ambulance services by Minnesota Statutes 471.476 and by special laws (Chapter 426, Laws of 1975, and Chapter 743, Laws of 1978); and WHEREAS, it is fair and reasonable to charge for services rendered based upon the type of services provided, i.e., basic or advance life support services as defined by Medicare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the following charges shall be effective January 1, 1989: Basic ambulance services $ 90.00 Advanced life support ambulance services $210.00 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that there shall be no charge for services rendered when the length of services is 10 minutes or less, when the patient is not transported, or when the patient is transported to the detoxification center. 3. Increase in License /Permit Fees and Service Charges Approved first reading of an ordinance to increase planning Department service charges: Resolution No. 88 - 10 - 161 BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby adopt the following fees effective January 1, 1989: Proposed 1989 Fee Amusement Park License $ 129.00 Bench Permit: First Bench 40.00 Each Additional Bench 23.00 Bingo License: For One Night /Wk. for 52 Wks. 129.00 For Two Nights /Wk. for 52 Wks. 260.00 One Night 16.00 Christmas Tree Sales: Regular 124.00 Non- Profit Organization 97.00 Cigarettes & Tobacco 34.00 - 3 - 10 /10 Coin - Operated Amusement Devices: 33.00 Per Location 129.00 Per Machine 34.00 Dog Kennels: Original Application 34.00 Renewal 17.00 Gambling License 129.00 Gambling Investigation & Administration Fee 250.00 Golf Course 130.00 Home Occupations: Initial 47.00 Renewal 19.00 Motels: 1 - 15 Units 53.00 16 - 35 Units 82.00 36 - 100 Units 128.00 Over 100 158.00 Restaurant and /or Bakery: Food Establishment 142.00 Catering Food Vehicle: First Vehicle 74.00 Each Additional 34.00 Fleet License 197,00 Itinerant Food Establishment: (Limit 7 days) First Day 34.00 Each Additional Day 18.00 Non - Perishable Food Vehicle: First Vehicle 33.00 Each Additional 23.00 Fleet License 90.00 Potentially Hazardous Food Vehicle: First Vehicle 102.00 Each Additional 50,00 Fleet License 294.00 Special Food Handling Establishment 50.00 - 4 - 10 /10 Tavern License 260.00 Taxicab License Base Charge 34.00 Each Driver 13.00 Theater License: Indoor 129.00 Outdoor 260.00 Contractor's License 70.00 3.2 Beer License: On -Sale 100.00# Off -Sale 30.00* Temporary Food & Beer 18.00 /Day Licenses Due July lst: Used Car Dealer 260.00 Licenses Due August lst: Motor Vehicle Repair 47.00 Service Station: First Pump 53.00 Each Additional Pump 8.00 Trailer Rental: First 5 Trailers 18.00 Each Additional Trailer 6.00 Licenses Due November 1st: Club Liquor License 300.00* On -Sale Liquor 5,040.00 Off -Sale Liquor 200.00* Sunday Liquor 200.00* Beer & Wine: Seating up to 25 987.00 Each Additional 10 seats 129.00 Maximum 2,625.00 License Fee Set by State Law - 5 - 10 /10 Miscellaneous Service Charges: Tax - Exempt Mortgage Revenue Financing - Commercial Base Charge (% of Bond Issue) 19 Minimum 5,649.00 Maximum 22,606.00 Amount Paid With Application 2,000.00 Tax - Exempt Mortgage Revenue Financing - Multiple Dwellings Application Fee 2,205.00 Liquor License Investigation Fee 394.00 Block Party License 18.00 Carnival License 128.00 Solicitor License: Base Per Company 70.00 Additional Per Solicitor 35.00 Auctioneer License: Annual 65.00 Daily 18.00 Pawn Shop 65.00 Pending Assessment Searches 7.00 Police Accident Report Copies 6.00 Cat and Dog Licenses: Male 7.00 Female 7.00 Neutered /Spayed 4.00 Tax Increment Financing Application Fee (escrow) 5,460.00 Building Relocation 128.00 Community Design Review Board 100.00 Sewer Connection Permit: (Per Connection) Residential Connection 35.00 Non - Residential Connection 53.00 Moving Permit 70.00 - 6 - 10 /10 Wrecking Permit Driveway Permit 35.00 E Property Owner List 5.50 /Name Base Price 35.00 Mobile Home Permits 41.00 Occupancy Permit 6.00 Publications (Includes Sales Tax): Zoning Code 10.00 Platting Code 5.00 Sign Code 3.05 Comprehensive Plan 11.25 Zoning Map 4.10 City Map 4.10 Section Map 4.10 Planning Commission or Community Design Review Board: Minutes 8.00 /Yr. Agenda Packet 86.00 /Yr. 4. McKnight Road Phase II, Project 87 -04; M.S.A. Off- System Transfer Resolution No. 88 - 10 - 162 WHEREAS, it has been deemed necessary for the City of Maplewood to fund required storm sewer construction on McKnight Road between Larpenteur Avenue to T.H. 36, S.P. 62- 668 -25, City Project 87 -04 within the limits of said municipality, and WHEREAS, said construction project has been identified by the Commis- sioner of Transportation as MSA Project Number 138- 020 -08. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that we hereby authorize appropriation of $45,000 from our municipal state aid funds to apply toward the construction of said project and request the Commissioner of Transportation to approve this authorization. 5. Sterling Street Watermain, Project 87 -45; Change Order No. 1 Resolution No. 88 - 10 - 163 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 87 -45 and has let a construction contract - 7 - 10 /10 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 87 -45 Change Order One. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order One. 6. County Road C, White Bear to Ariel, Project 86 -25, Supplemental A. Resolution No. 88 - 10 - 164 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, has heretofore entered into a cooperative agreement with Ramsey County for Improvement Project 86 -25 which is pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 86 -25 Supplemental Agreement No. 1. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Supplemental Agreement No. 1. 7. Conditional Use Permit Renewal: East County Line Fire Station Approved the renewal of a conditional use permit for five years at 1177 Century Avenue, subject to the original conditions of approval. 8. Conditional Use Permit Discussed under Item I -5. 9. Certification of Delinquent Sewer Accounts Resolution No. 88 - 10 - 165 RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify to the Auditor of Ramsey County the attached list of delinquent sewer rental charges and hydrant charges said list made a part herein, for certification against the tax levy of said property owners for the Year 1988, collectible in 1989, and which listing includes interest at the rate of eight (8) percent on the total amount for one year. Total amount to be certified: $79,363.14 10. Linwood Heights Townhouses Authorization to board up the Linwood Heights Townhouses that are not completed. - 8 - 10 /10 F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M., Assessment Hearing: Cope Avenue Project 85 -26 a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the adoption of the proposed assessment roll for Cope Avenue Project 85 -26. b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. c. City Attorney Kelly explained the legal requirements. d. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the proposal. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard: Joan Themmes, 1928 Castle Charles Jaworski, 1922 Castle Mrs. John Glasow, 2271 Craig Place Letter from John Glasow Helga Gehrke, 1917 Cope Avenue Marcia Holdran, 1927 Cope Avneue A proposed buyer of a lot on Cope Avenue James Promish, 7 W. Golden Lake Road, Circle Pines Joe Moreno, 2272 Craig Place g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 88 - 10 - 166 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the construction of Cope Avenue, Hazel to Ariel, as described in the files of the City Clerk as Project 85 -26, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 20 years, the first of the install- ments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January, 1990, and shall bear interest at the rate of nine (9.0) per- cent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1989. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. - 9 - 10 /10 3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 4. To the extent that this improvement benefits non - abutting properties which may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the City by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements. 5. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other muni- cipal taxes. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Juker and Rossbach Nay - Councilmember Bastian. i. Mayor Greavu moved to establish the meeting date of October 24 1988 to hear appeals of the assessments. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Juker and Rossbach Nay - Councilmember Bastian. 2. 7:10 P.M., Larpenteur Avenue and Sylvan Street (St. Paul Water Utilities) a. Plan Amendment b. Conditional Use Permit (4 Votes) 1. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of the St. Paul Water Utility for a comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permit to construct a clear water holding pond. The plan amendment is required because the property is desig- nated for park use. A conditional use permit is required for a public utility use in a farm residential district. 2. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. - 10 - 10 /10 3. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. 4. Commissioner Dennis Larson presented the Planning Commission report. 5. Carl Steed, St. Paul Water Department, spoke on behalf of the proposal. 6. Mayor Greavu called for proponents and opponents. The following voiced their opinions: Gerald Vimr, 1772 Sylvan 7. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. 8. Councilmember Bastian moved to approve the Plan Amendment and the Conditional Use Permit. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Councilmember Bastian withdrew his motion. 9. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 88 - 10 - 167 WHEREAS, the St. Paul Water Utility initiated an amendment to the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan from P, park to W, water facility for the following property at the northwest corner of Larpenteur and Sylvan. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 19, 1988, to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All per- sons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Planning Commis- sion recommended to the City Council that said plan amend- ment be approved. 2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on October 10, 1988. The Council considered reports and recom- mendations from the Planning Commission and City Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The City's Director of _'arks and Recreation feels that the cost of a community playfield or any other type of park on this site cannot be justified. - 11 - 10 /10 2. This site is needed for a water treatment pond. 3. The ultimate City population used to project the need for a community playfield on this site appears to be too high. 4. The City leased this site for a park from 1974 -86, but did not develop it because of neighborhood opposition. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 9. Councilmember Bastian moved to approve several amendments to the Conditional Use Permit. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 10. Councilmember Rossbach moved to table the Conditional Use Permit request for further investigation. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 3. 7:20 P.M., 1420 So. Sterling Street (Bierschenk) a. Lot Width Variance b. Lot Frontage Variance c. Side Lot Line Orientation Variance d. Rezoning 1. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the re- quest of Lance Bierschenk for a variance from the zoning code and those variances from the subdivison code to divide his lot into three single - dwelling parcels. 2. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. 3. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. 4. Commissioner Larson presented the Planning Commission report. 5. Mayor Greavu called for proponents and opponents. Lance Bierschenk spoke on behalf of the proposal. 6. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. 7. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following, rsolution and moved its adoption: E:I: I ILG] E I I C:4 WHEREAS, Lance Bierschenk applied for a lot- frontage and side lot line orientation variations for the following- described property: Part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 28 North, Range 22 West, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeasterly corner of - 12 - 10 /10 said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence West along the Southerly line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 710.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence North a distance of 400.00 feet; thence North 68 ° 45' West a distance of 270.00 feet; thence South 46 ° 00' West to the Westerly line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence South along said Westerly line to the Southwesterly corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence Easterly along said Southerly line to the point of beginning. This property is also known as 1420 Sterling Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, Section 30 -8 (f) (1) (a.) (2.) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires a minimum lot frontage of sixty feet; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing thirty feet requiring a variation of thirty feet; WHEREAS, Section 30 -8 (f) (5) requires side lines of lots to be sub- stantially at right angles or radial to the street line. WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing side lines that are substantially perpendicular to Sterling Street. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on April 8, 1988. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on September 19, 1988. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said variance be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on October 10, 1988, to consider this variance. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written state- ments. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described variations be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. Approval is necessary to make reasonable use of the property, due to its irregular shape and steep topography. 2. Approval would not affect the character of the area or the provision of public safety services - the principal reasons for subdivision review. 3. Council has approved two similar requests. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. - 13 - 10 /10 S. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: WHEREAS, Lance Bierschenk applied for a lot width variation and variance for the following- described property: Part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 28 North, Range 22 West, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeasterly corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence West along the Southerly line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quar- ter a distance of 710.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence North a distance of 400.00 feet; thence North 68° 45' West a distance of 270.00 feet; thence South 46 ° 00' West to the Westerly line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence South along said Westerly line to the Southwesterly corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence Easterly along said Southerly line to the point of beginning. This property is also known as 1420 Sterling Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, sections 30 -8 (f) (1) (a.) (1.) and 36 -69 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires 75 feet of lot width at the established building setback line. WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing thirty feet, requiring a variance and a variation of 45 feet; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on April 8, 1988. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning commission on September 19, 1988. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said variance be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on October 10, 1988, to consider this variance. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written state- ments. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described variance and variation be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship due to circumstances unique to property under consideration because: a. The plight of the owner is due to the irregular shape of, and steep topography of, his property. This 4.9 acre parcel is otherwise large enough to support three lots. - 14 - 10 /10 b. Subdivision into less than three lots would be unreasonable since the intent of all public safety and environmental - related codes can be complied with. c. Approval would not alter the essential character of the area, This neighborhood is comprised of several irregular- shaped lots and houses accessed by long driveways. d. Council has approved two similar requests. 2. The variance would be in keeping with spirit and intent of the ordinance. Approval would not affect the general plan or intent of the subdivision code, provided the conditions of approval are adhered to. Approval is subject to: 1. Recording a deed restriction or covenants with each property accept- able to the City, that addresses: a. Responsibility for construction, maintenance and identification of the common driveway. This driveway shall comply with the dimension and turn - around requirements stated in Section 10.207 of Uniform Fire Safety Code. Its location on Parcel One shall not cause any grading above 902.5 contour, until east of the protected steep slope. The steep grade along Sterling Avenue shall also be elimianted to provide property site distances from the driveway along Sterling Street. b. Identification each site of the location for a backup drain field, which is acceptable to the City. The soils in this area should not be disturbed or built on, prior to use as a drain field. c. Maintenance records for the drain field(s) shall be kept and be presented to City officials upon demand. d. The steep, wooded slopes on Parcels One and Three are to be left in their natural state. e. A detailed grading plan, with proposed construction and per- manent erosion control measures, shall be approved by the City for the driveway and building paid for Parcel One. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 9. Councilmember Anderson _introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 88 -10 -170 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F, farm residence to R -1, single dwelling for the following- described property: - 15 - 10 /10 Part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 28 North, Range 22 West, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeasterly corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 710.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence North a distance of 400.00 feet; thence North 68 ° 45' West a distance of 270.00 feet; thence South 46 ° 00' West to the Westerly line of said South- west Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence South along said Westerly line to the Southwesterly corner of said Southwest Quar- ter of the Northeast Quarter; thence Easterly along said Southerly line to the point of beginning. This property is also known as 1420 Sterling Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on September 19, 1988. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on October 10, 1988, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above = described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveni- ences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. 5. Approval would eliminate the potential of any form - related use occurring which would be incompatible with single - dwelling de- velopment. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. - 16 - 10 /10 4. 7:30 P.M., Code Amendment- Residential Garage Size (First Reading) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a proposed code amendment to allow residential garages over 1,000 square feet but not to exceed 1,250 square feet, by conditional use permit on lots under one acre. b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. d. Commissioner Larson presented the Planning Commission report. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents or opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Bastian moved first reading of an ordinance to regulate the size of garages on single dwelling lots. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 5. 7:40 P.M., Conditional Use Permit or Variance: 834 No. McKnight Road (Hayes) a. Councilmember Bastian moved to table this item until the Meeting of October 24, 1988. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. Mayor Greavu recessed the meeting at 9:05 P.M. Mayor Greavu reconvened the meeting at 9:10 P.M. 6. 7:50 P.M., Economic Development Authority and Joint Powers Agreement a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of the Emergency Fund Service that Maplewood establish an Economic Development Authority (EDA) and enter into a joint powers agreement with the St. Paul Port Authority to provide financing for the acquisition of a warehouse at 1140 Gervais Avenue. b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. c. Mayor Greavu called for proponents and opponents. None were heard. d. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. e. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 88 - 10 - 171 WHEREAS, Laws Minnesota 1988, Chapter 678 authorizes the City of Maplewood to establish an economic development authority (the "Authority ") - 17 - 10 /10 pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.909 to 469.108, with specified powers and obligations to promote and to provide incentives for economic development; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City ") has determined that it is in its best interest to establish the Authority in order to preserve and create jobs, enhance its tax base, and to promote the general welfare of the people of the City; and WHEREAS, the City has provided public notice and conducted a public hearing on the proposed adoption of this enabling resolution on October 10, 1988, and has fulfilled all other legal requirements for the establish- ment of the Authority. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD: 1. An economic development authority to be known as the "Economic Development Authority of the City of Maplewood" with all the powers, rights, duties, and obligations as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 to 469.108 and any other law is hereby established in and for the City. 2. The Authority shall be governed by a board of five (5) commissioners who shall be the members of the City Council. The Commissioners shall be elected and qualified in the same manner as the City Council. 3. Nothing shall prevent the City from modifying this enabling resolu- tion to impose limits on the powers of the Authority or for pro- viding for other matters as authorized by Minnesota Statutes, ' Sections 469.090 to 469.108 or any other law. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. f. Councilmember Bastian moved to aoDrove the Joint Powers as Dresentea. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. 7. 8:00 P.M., On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License: Maplewood Bowl a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Barbara Ann Johnston for an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License to be located at the Maplewood Bowl, 1955 English Street. b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. c. Director of Public Safety Collins stated he had met with Mrs. Johnston and advised her of Maplewood's liquor laws. d. Barbara Johnston, the applicant, spoke on behalf of the request. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents and opponents. None were heard. f. Councilmember Juker introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: - 18 - 10 /10 88 - 10 - 172 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to action by the City Council of the City of Maplewood on October 10, 1988, an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License was approved for Barbara Ann Johnston, Bar Manager for Maplewood Bowl, on 1955 English Street. The Council proceeded in this matter as outlined under the provisions of the City Ordinance. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. G. AWARD OF BIDS None. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Code Amendment: Setback to Residential Zones (2nd Reading - 4 Votes). a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 633 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR SETBACKS TO RESIDENTIALLY -ZONED LAND THE MAFLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Subsection 36 -27 (a) under landscaping and screening, is amended as follows: (a) A landscaped area of not less than twenty (20) feet in width shall be provided where: (1) A nonresidential use abuts a residentially -zoned property. (2) A multiple dwelling abuts property zoned for single or double dwellings. The requirements of this subsection shall not apply where the residentially -zoned property is being used or is designated on the City's land use plan for a nonresidential use. Section 2. Subsection 36 -119 (g), under the R -3 multiple district, is amended as follows: (g) Setbacks increased. (1) The minimum front, side and rear yard setbacks for an R -3A multiple dwelling shall be increased, not to exceed seventy - five (75) feet, by the most restrictive of the following requirements, where the lot abuts a farm residence, residen- tial estate, single dwelling, or double - dwelling zoning district: - 19 - 10 /10 a. Building height: The building setbacks shall be increased two (2) feet for each one foot the building exceeds twenty - five (25) feet in height. b. Exterior wall area: Where an exterior wall faces residentially - zoned property, the setback of the wall shall be increased five (5) feet for each one thousand (1,000) square feet, or part thereof, in excess of two thousand (2,000) square feet. (2) A building addition which would encroach into a required setback may be approved by conditional use permit, if such encroachment would be consistent with surrounding property setbacks and screened in a man- ner acceptable to the Community Design Review Board. At least 80% of the addition shall be screened from abutting residential property. (3) The requirements of this subsection shall not apply where the resi- dentially -zoned property is being used or is designated on the City's land use plan for a nonresidential use. Section 3. Subsection 36 -130 (d), under the NC, neighborhood commercial district, is amended as follows: (d) Building setbacks. (1) The minimum building setback from a right -of -way shall be thirty (30) feet and twenty (20) feet from side and rear property lines (2) Where a setback is from residentially -zoned property, the minimum required setbacks shall be increased, not to exceed seventy -five (75) feet, subject to the most restrictive of the following re- quirements: a. Building height: The building setbacks shall be increased two (2) feet for each one foot the building exceeds twenty - five (25) feet in height. b. Exterior wall area: Where an exterior wall faces a residen- tially -zoned property, the wall setback shall be increased five (5) feet for each one thousand (1,000) square feet, or part thereof, in excess of two thousand (2,000) square feet. (3) A building addition which would encroach into a required setback may be approved by conditional use permit, if such encroachment would be consistent with surrounding property setbacks and screened in a manner acceptable to the Community Design Review Board. At least 80% of the addition shall be screened from abutting resi- dential property. (4) The requirements of this subsection shall not apply where the residentially -zoned property is being used or is designated on the City's land use plan for a nonresidential use. Section 4. Section 36 -140 (f) (1), under the CO, commercial office district, is amended as follows: (1) Adjacent to residentially -zoned property: - 20 - 10 /10 a. A building shall have minimum side and rear yard setbacks of fifty (50) feet and a minimum front yard setback of thirty (30) feet. These minimum required setbacks shall be increased, not to exceed seventy -five (75) feet subject to the most restrictive of the following requirements: 1. Building height. The building setbacks shall be increased two (2) feet for each one foot the building exceeds twenty - five (25) feet in height. 2. Exterior wall area: Where an exterior wall faces a residentially -zoned property, the wall setback shall be increased five (5) feet for each one thousand (1,000) square feet, or part thereof, in excess of two thousand (2,000) square feet. b. A building addition which would encroach into a required setback may be approved by conditional use permit, if such encroachment would be consistent with surrounding property setbacks and screened in a manner acceptable to the Community Design Review Board. At least 80% of the addition shall be screened from abutting residential property. c. The requirements of this subsection shall not apply where the residentially -zoned property is being used or is designated on the City's land use plan for a nonresidential use. Section 5. Subsection 36 -153 (3), under the BC, business commercial district, is amended as follows: (3) Setback from property zoned residential: a. The building shall have minimum side and rear yard setbacks of fifty (50) feet and a minimum front yard setback of thirty (30) feet. These minimum required setbacks shall be increased, not to exceed seventy -five (75) feet, subject to the most restrictive of the following requirements: (1) Building height: The building setbacks shall be increased two (2) feet for each one foot the building exceeds twenty - five (25) feet in height. (2) Exterior wall area: Where an exterior wall faces a residentially -zoned property, the wall setback shall be increased five (5) feet for each one thousand (1,000) square feet, or part thereof, in excess of two thousand (2,000) square feet. b. A building addition which would encroach into a required setback may be approved by conditional use permit, if such encroachment - 21 - 10 /10 would be consistent with szrrounding property setbacks and screened in a manner acceptable to the Community Design Review Board. At least 809 of the addition shall be screened from abutting residential property. c. The requirements of this subsection shall not apply where the residentially -zoned property is being used or is designated on the City's land use plan for a nonresidential use. Section 6. Subsection 36 -154 (b), under the LBC, limited business commercial district, is amended as follows: (b) Setback from property zoned residential. (1) The building shall have minimum side and rear yard setbacks of twenty (20) feet and a minimum front yard setback of thirty (30) feet. These minimum required setbacks shall be increased, not to exceed seventy -five (75) feet, subject to the most restrictive of the following requirements: a. Building height: The building setbacks shall be increased two (2) feet for each one foot the building exceeds twenty - five (25) feet in height. b. Exterior wall area: Where an exterior wall faces a residentially -zoned property, the wall setback shall be increased five (5) feet for each one thousand (1,000) square feet, or part thereof, in excess of two thousand (2,000) square feet. (2) A building addition which would encroach into a required setback may be approved by conditional use permit, if such encroachment would be consistent with surrounding property setbacks and screened in a manner acceptable to the Community Design Review Board. At least 809 of the addition shall be screened from abutting resi- dential property. (3) The requirements of this subsection shall not apply where the residentially -zoned property is being used or is designated on City's land use plan for a nonresidential use. Section 7. Section 36 -155 (f), under the BC (M), business commercial (Modified) district, is amended as follows: (f) Setback from property zoned residential: (1) The building shall have minimum side and rear yard setbacks of fifty (50) feet and a minimum front yard setback of thirty (30) feet. These minimum required setbacks shall be increased, not to exceed seventy -five (75) feet, subject to the most restrictive of the following requirements: - 22 - 10 /10 a. Building height: The building setbacks shall be increased two (2) feet for each one foot the building exceeds twenty - five (25) feet in height. b. Exterior wall area: Where an exterior wall faces a residentially -zoned property, the wall setback shall be increased five (5) feet for each one thousand (1,000) square feet, or part thereof, in excess of two thousand (2,000) square feet. (2) A building addition which would encroach into a required setback may be approved by conditional use permit, if such encroachment would be consistent with surrounding property setbacks and screened in a manner acceptable to the Community Design Review Board. At least 80% of the addition shall be screened from abutting resi- dential property. (3) The requirements of this subsection shall not apply where the residentially -zoned property is being used or is designated on the City's land use plan for a nonresidential use. Section 8. Section 36 -172 (6) (c), under the SC, shopping center district, is amended as follows: (c) Where adjacent to a property zoned residential, buildings shall have minimum side and rear yard setbacks of fifty (50) feet and a minimum front yard setback of thirty (30) feet. These minimum required setbacks shall be increased, not to exceed seventy -five (75) feet, subject to the most restrictive of the follow - ing requirements: 1. Building height: The building setbacks shall be increased two (2) feet for each one foot the building exceeds twenty -five (25) feet in height. 2. Exterior wall area: Where an exterior wall faces a residentially - zoned property, the wall setbacks shall be increased five (5) feet for each one thousand (1,000) square feet, or part thereof, in excess of two thousand (2,000) square feet. (d) A building addition which would encroach into a required setback may be approved by conditional use permit, if such encroachment would be con- sistent with surrounding property setbacks and screened in a manner acceptable to the Community Design Review Board. At least 80% of the addition shall be screened from abutting residential property. (e) The requirements of this subsection shall not apply where the residentially -zoned property is being used or is designated on the City's land use plan for a nonresidential use. Section 9. Section 36 -189 (M -1, light manufacturing district) is amended as follows: - 23 - 10 /10 Section 36 -189. Setbacks adjacent to residentially -zoned property. (a) The minimum side and rear yard setbacks shall be fifty (50) feet and the minimum front _yard setback shall be thirty (30) feet. These minimum required setbacks shall be increased, not to exceed seventy -five (75) feet, subject to the most restrictive of the following requirements: (1) Building height. The building setbacks shall be increased two (2) feet for each one foot the building exceeds twenty -five (25) feet in height. (2) Exterior wall area. Where an exterior wall faces a residentially - zoned property, the wall setback shall be increased five (5) feet for each one thousand (1,000) square feet, or part thereof, in excess of two thousand (2,000) square feet. (b) A building addition which would encroach into a required setback may be approve by conditional use permit, if such encroachment would be con- sistent with surrounding property setbacks and screened in a manner acceptable to the Community Design Review board. At least 80% of the addition shall be screened from abutting residential property. (c) The requirements of this subsection shall not apply where the residentially -zoned property is being used or is designated on the City's land use plan for a nonresidential use. Section 10. Section 36 -204 (M -2, heavy manufacturing district) is amended as follows: Section 36 -204. Setbacks adjacent to residentially -zoned property. (a) The minimum side and rear yard setbacks shall be fifty (50) feet and the minimum front - yard setback shall be thirty (30) feet. These minimum required setbacks shall be increased, not to exceed seventy -five (75) feet, subject to the most restrictive of the following requirements: (1) Building height: The building setbacks shall be increased two (2) feet for each one foot the building exceeds twenty -five (25) feet in height. (2) Exterior wall area: Where an exterior wall faces a residentially - zoned property, the wall setback shall be increased five (5) feet for each one thousand (1,000) square feet, or part thereof, in excess of two thousand (2,000) square feet. (b) A building addition which would encroach into a required setback may be approved by conditional use permit, if such encroachment would be consistent with surrounding property setbacks and screened in a man- ner acceptable to the Community Design Review Board. At least 80% of the addition shall be screened from abutting residential .property. (c) The requirements of this subsection shall not apply where the residentially -zoned property is being used or is designated on the - 24 - 10 /10 City's land use plan for a norresidential use. Section 11. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publica- tion. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian & Rossbach Nay - Councilmember Juker. 2. Gervais Avenue, Kennard - Hazelwood -Truck Restrictions a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report b. City Attorney Kelly stated he would research the legality of such restric- tions. c. Councilmember Anderson moved to table this item until October 24, 1988 meeting. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. . NEW BUSINESS 1. Walter Street, Project 84 -14; a. Manager McGuire presented Feasibility Study the Staff report. b. Councilmember Juker introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 88 -10 -173 WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the im- provement of Walter Street, Fenton Avenue to Frost Avenue, City Project 84 -14, by construction of roadway and appurtenances with associated utilities, and WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the City Engiener advising this Council that the proposed improvement on Walter Street, Fenton Avenue to Frost Avenue, City Project 84 -14, by construction of roadway and appur- tenances with associated utilities is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or - 25 - 10 /10 a portion of the cost of the improvement according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $69,600. 3. A public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1830 East County Road B on Monday, the 14th day of November, 1988, at 7:00 P.M. to consider said improvement. The City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 2. Gonyea's Oak Heights Third Addition a. Revised Preliminary Plat Conditions b. Time Extension c. No. Parking 1. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. 2. Arnie Esterbrook, representing Gonyea, spoke on behalf of the proposal. 3. Mayor Greavu moved to approve a one -year time extension for Gonvea's nwq- (1) The street plans shall provide for a 36 -foot wide street, a five -foot wide concrete sidewalk along the east side of the street and "no parking" signs along the east side of the street. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. as 4. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 88- 10 -174 WHEREAS, Lakewood Drive from Schadt Drive to Highwood Avenue is designated a collector street. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, CITY COUNCIL that the east side of Lakewood Drive from Schadt Drive to Highwood Avenue be designated "No Parking." Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes —all. 3. Gonyea's Oak Heights Fourth Addition a. Revised Preliminary Plat Conditions b. Time Extension. 1. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. - 2 6 - 10 /10 2. Councilmember Anderson r__ n_____ I- n_, .,. • , . r r b. Final grading, utility, draiange, erosion control and street plans must be approved by the City Engineer. These plans shall include, but not be limited to: 1. 36- foot -wide street. "No parking" signs shall be posted along the east side of the street. c. Submittal of a signed developer's agreement, with surety, to include, but not to be limited to, the following requirements: d. A recordable deed restriction shall be submitted to the City to prohibit a driveway access from Highwood Avenue for Lot One, Bloch Two. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 4. Code Amendment - On -Site Sewage Treatment (1st Reading) a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian move upgrading the code for on -site Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 5. Emergency Sewer Connection: Albert Olson, 2599 No: Ariel Street a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved ats adoption: 88- 10 -175 WHEREAS, pursuant to Minn. Stat. §444.075 and Maplewood Code of Ordinances Section 35 -23, the City of Maplewood has authority to charge for connections to sanitary sewer services and has the authority to allow installment payments for such connection charges; and WHEREAS, Albert Olson, who resides at 2599 Ariel Street, Maplewood, has requested to be connected to the North St. Paul Sewer System, and WHEREAS, Albert Olson has represented to the City of Maplewood that the septic system cannot be repaired without exorbitant costs; and WHEREAS, Albert Olson has shown financial hardship, and is unable to pay cash for the connection to city sewer immediately upon conenction to the services. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Maplewood City Council that: - 27 - 10 /10 The City Clerk shall certify to the County Auditor the amount of $3770.00 for the sewer connection charge for City of No. St. Paul services, and also shall forward to the County Auditor the legal description of Albert Olson's property, which is: Lots 1 through 6, Block 4, Maplewood Addition to North St. Paul Such connection charge shall be collected with the property taxes beginning in 1989 and each subsequent year until 1991, subject to 8 percent interest. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian, and Rossbach Nay - Councilmember Juker. 6. Conditional Use Permit Renewal Highway 61 (Frattalone) a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve the renewal of the conditional use permit for mineral extraction north and northwest of Gulden's Restaura west of HiBhwav 61. for one vear. subiect to cmmnlinnce with the nriainnl Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. J. VISITOR PRESENTATION A resident in the Linwood Heights Townhouses at 673 Dorland Road brought the Council up to date as to what is taking place with the townhomes. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Cable a. Councilmember Anderson stated that Cable Channel 64 is designated for Maplewood and suggest we use it. b. Staff stated the City offices are not hooked up to the cable system as yet. 2. Lake Phalen a. Councilmember Anderson questioned if the City has any authority for the north end of Lake Phalen. It seems St. Paul never notifies Maplewood when improvements are made to Lake Phalen. b. Councilmember Anderson moved to refer this question to the City Attorney and report back at the next meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. - 28 - 10 /10 3. Community Center a. Councilmember Anderson questioned if there is any interest in a community center in Maplewood. 4. Curbside Recycling a. Councilmember Juker moved to establish the date of October 17, 1988 at 5:30 P.M. to meet with Cnnher reoArdino tha rarnrl;no nrnnram Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 5. Manager's Meeting a. Councilmember Juker stated that a Manager's meeting with the Council should be scheduled. b. No action taken. 6. Historical Preservation Group a. Councilmember Bastian moved to investigate establishing a historical preservation group. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 7. Legislative Contact - AMM a. Councilmember Bastian moved that Manager McGuire be appointed as the legislative contact with AMM. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 8. Local Action Blueprint. a. Councilmember Bastian stated there is a Local Action Blueprint showing the housing needs for the elderly and disabled. He will get the Manager a copy. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATION None. M. ADJOURNMENT 10:10 P.M. City Clerk - 29 - 10 /10 Agenda Number E -1 Action by Cow. AGENDA REPORT Council Endorsed 14od e . TO: City Manager Re j ected.®. Date FROM: Finance Director RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: December 1 1988 It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 399,901.42 200,973.39 $ 600 Checks #8441 - #8501 Dated 11 -14 -88 thru 11 -30 -88 Checks #4743 - #4841 Dated 12 -12 -88 Total per attached voucher /check register PAYROLL: $ 166,704.37 Payroll Checks $ 30,882.52 Payroll Deductions $ 197, 586.89 Total Payroll $ 798 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. DFF : kaz VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE I IZ/01/88 11:32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER C' ra Cs M I- fla T n M 4 .4 VOUCHER/ CHECK VENDO C VENDOR I TU TE CHECK 3 4 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION --I AMOUNT AMOUNT 5 6 �441 Z80530 11/14/88 SAL, INC OF' 14APLEWCJFJD SEWER RILLINgS 685.69 685.69 7 a 9 8 442 7 11/15/88 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 3 39000000 10 11 8443 541400 11/15/88 MINN, STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES .13 247.20 139247.20 13 14 8444 541400 11/15/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER ST DRIV LIC FEES 640.0 Q 640.00 15 16 17 8445 540900 11/15/88 MINN. G,FoOoAo TRAVEL & TRAIN 9.00 18 19 TRAVEL & TRAIN le.Qo 20 21 8446 070130 11/16/88 BEAVER CREEK APT LMT PARTNERS DEVELOPER CHARGES ES 26.52 26.52 2 23 24 8447 240725 11116/88 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS DEPO W/PAYING ACTS 1 11000,00 25 26 8448 530500 11/16t88 METRO.WASTE CONTROL COMMISSN SAC PAYABLE 18 27 SAC RETAINER 181.50- 179968,50 29 30 8450 54140 11/16/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES 9 2 Z4.9 9 31 32 33 8451 '541400 11/16/88 MINN., STATE TREASURER ST DRIVERS LIC FEES 471.50 471.50 35 36 8452 140400 11/17/88 CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT CNTY DRIVERS LIC FEES 89.50 89.50 37 38 8453 5414 11/17/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES 107 96 39 40 41 8454 541400 llil ,7/88 MINN, STATE TREASURER ST DRIVERS LIC EES F 13Z.50 13�.5Q 4Z 43 as 8455 231500 11/17/88 EDEN SYSTEMS INC. EQUIPMENT PURCHASED 450.00 450.00 45 8457 630260 11/ NATIONAL LEAGUE OF' CITIES TRAVEL & TRAIN 75-00 75.00 47 48 49 8458 144700 11/18/8$ DEPT, OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR LIC FEES PAY 1T7.00 IT7.00 50 51 52 8459 050010 11 18/88 A T & T C-OMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 734.93 53 TELEPHONE 42.91 54 55 TELEPHONE 4281 56 TELEPHONE 3.77 57 misce 12.51 298.93 se 59 60 8461 450250 11/18/88 LAKE AREA UTILITY CONTRACTING AWARDED CONSTR CTR .81,905.29 819905.29 61 62 Q46Z 07 WESCO SUPPLIES JANITOR 317.94 63 SUPPLIES JANI'rOR 6.36- 311 •58 r35 8463 6 40 81 5 11 A tj OMES DEPOSITS-PAY 9 9 8!295,05- 67 8464 130900 11/18/88 CHILTON ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AMB 714454 96.00- 66w 70 71 AMB 800128 23.20- 72 AMB 800078 29.00- 7 73 AMB 800250 11.60- 75 176 ) VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 2 12/01/88 11:32 VOUCHL-*.R/CHECK REGISTER 2 VOUCHER/ u 3 CHECK ---VENDOR Q H E- C 9 VENDOR I TEM I TE M 4 NUMBER 5 5 NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION ELU FOR-SLRVICE AMOUNT 216m32 -CHECK AMOUNT 7 3 8465 8407.00 11/18/88 ST, PAUL/MAPLEWOOD DUTO TO GOVN UNITS - 5 56.5 5 10 8466 A 842700 11/18/88 STATE OF MINNESOTA TREASURER FEES FOR SERVICE 10.00 10.00 12 84-67 --5-4.1-4-0-Q 11/18/88 MINN. SIATE-TREASUEL-B MOTOE YEH LIQ EES 6o70Z-.95 66702.25 13 14 8468 . 541400 11/18/88 MINN, STATE TREASURER STATE DRIV LIC FEES 475.50 475.50 .7 8469 451200 11/18/88 LAMETTI SONS AWARDED CONST CUNT 33 33,676.99 8 71 14426ti ll/Zlj�g DE PT OF IBADE. & ECONOMIC REIMBUHUD Q-lIY 9 -DLY 5Z6000,00 t 8472 861300 11/21/88 TERRA BUILDERS AWARDED CONST GTR 9,785.72 99785,72 2 3 8473 630050 11/21/88 N,S.P. UTILITIES 220.35 2 4 UTILITIES UTILIJJES 96.48 97.23 UTILITIES 68o50 UTILITIES Ll T T L I T I Fs- 7,070.4Z 3 rb UTILITIES 41.08 3 3 UTILITIES UTILITIES 6.60 :12Z-77 3 3 4 UTILITIES 150.31 4 UTILITIES 66.40 4 89757,05 4 8474 8475 020925 -00 5414 --- 11/21/88 11/21/88 AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION MINN, SIATE IREASURER PROGRAM SUPPLIES STATE LIC FEES 598.80 fil 5. so 4 4 598.80 4 8476 541400 11/21/88 MINN, STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES l0 .50' 5 1 4! 54 10 .51 5; 8477 5414-00 11/22/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES 11 119027.50 5: !R47 -8 54 1400 1112 2/88 MINN .-S-TA-TE-TREAS RER- RTAI'E DRIV LIC FEES B B A F 5 54 8479 722200 1 1 /22/88 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE LIFE INS PAY 99.00 1) 5" 5E 99,00 55 6C 8480 140400 11/23/88 CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT CNTY DRIVERS LIC. 88.50 88.50 61 62 248 1 541400--- 11123182 MINN. STATE TREA USER MOOR VF�l Lic FEEE.* 9 4-9Z. 1 s 63 9,!t97, 1 S 64 8482 541400 11/23/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC 475.00 65 66 .475,00 67 68 8483 141300 11/23/88 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE FUEL & OIL 8.31 70 FUEL & OIL 18 2 U 71 2 9-) FUEL & OIL 8.00 73 74 FUEL & OIL 16.65 75 76 VOUCHREG 12/01/88 11:32 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD VOUCHE.R/CHE.:.CK REGISTER PAGE 3 K I u D 1 VOUCHER/ 3 CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME __ DESCRIPTION ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 6 7 FUEL & OIL 18.61 8 FUEL & OIL 13.31 9 FUEL & OIL 7.78 117.15 to 8484 144700 11/23/88 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR LIC. FEES PBL. oil it? 445.00 445.00 8485 231500 11/23/88 EDEN SYSTEMS INC. CONTRACT PYM. 13 315.00 315.00 I14 8486 070300 11/23/88 BERM LOIS SUPPLIES OFFICE IS 16 SUPPLIES OFFICE 7.00 14.30 17 SUPPLIES OFFICE 20.14 - 18 PROG, SUPPLIES 53.90 95.34 19 8487 890100 11/23/88 U S WEST TELEPHONE «jry -- 20 1 550 TELEPHONE 50,92 22 TELEPHONE 50.02 23 TELEPHONE 278-03 24 TELEPHONE 1 25 TELEPHONE 50.92 26 TELEPHONE 48472 3 27 TELEPHONE 48.72 3 28 TELEPHONE ---- 48 ,72- 3 3 29 TELEPHONE 48.72 3 30 TELEPHONE 4 1 8.72 3 31 TELEPHONE 102005 3' 41 32 TELEPHONE 38,90 4 33 TELEPHONE 88690 4: 34 -TELEPHONE 3 ol. 0 4: 41 35 TELEPHONE -8 52.65 4! 36 TELEPHONE 39.00 40 37 TELEPHONE 38-20 4", 44 38 TELEPHONE 19 50 41 39 TELEPHONE 89:05 5( 40 TELEPHONE I li*90 32 41 TELEPHONE - 67-95 53 42 TELEPHONE 81,80 54 43 --TELEPHONL so TELEPHONE 47.37 so 37 45 46 TELEPHONE IEl-U-H 0 N E 1D? .33 so 47 8488 49 722200 11/23/88 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERA DEDUCTION P—EBA—C-ONlRlL--UTlO--N 50.92 8 4 0.75 so 61 63 so 51 8489 510900 11/28/88 MAPLEWOOD STATE BANK FICA PAYABLE 62 1 -32- 6 • 92 52 F ------------- ISO 53 FICA CONTR 61534.92 319584.03 69 70 5 4 8490 5414-00 11/28/88 MINN. STATE TRE-ASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES 71 -9 a 733-1-95 9s,733.95 72 8491 541400 11/28/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIV LIC FEES T40.50 73 74 740850 76 VOUCHREG CITY Of--' MAPLEWOOD PAGE 4 12/01/88 11:32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER VOUCHER/ CHECK VENDOR CHECK VEND-013 ITEM ITEM CHECK 3 4 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTIUN AMOUNT AMOUNT 5 6 849Z 741ZQO 11/28/88 13 A I N BOW INCO REPAIR ai. MAINT/U 29.00 20.00 7 a $493 130550 11/Z8/88 CHEMLAWN,INC. REPAIR & MAINT/BLDG 304.00 304.00 liz 9 10 it 8494 560100 11/28/88 MN STATE COMMISSIONER STATE INC TAX PAY 7 79216.03 13 14 8495 943590 ll/Z8/88 WISCONSIN DEPT. OF EF VENU F= • 35TAIE INC TAX RAY 115.46 115.46 15 16 :8496 720600 1l/29/88 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 985.46 985.46 17 18 19 20 8497 $428 541400 541 11/29/88 ll/Z2ZQ8 MINN, STATE TREASURER MINN, SIATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES U DSIV LIC EELS 13 550 - 01) 13l084.70 550,00 21 22 23 24 8499 710650 11/30/88 PEPPERCORN RESTAURANT PROGRAMS 143.75 143.75 25 26 27 8500 '8591 5414-00 541400 11/30/88 11139188 MINN. STATE TREASURER MINNe SIAIE MEASURER MOTOR VEH LIC PBL. STATE DRIVERS LIC 2BL, 14 632 - 149508.60 622.00 29 30 31 32 $4560 J44510 11/18/88 DE CHEER CHESTER AMB 811345 58.00 58.00 33 34 35 4743 4744 020825 021000 I2/I2/88 lZ112188-AML81-DATA. ALL STATE ELECTRIC SYSIEM SUPPLIES JANITOR REPAIR & MAINILE 135.00 135.00 37 38 39 40 4745 OZ1500 12/IZ/88 AMERICAN STORES SUPPLIES VEHICLE SHEEITES VF-HT(-[F 58,,67 41 42 93 44 SUPPLIES VEHICLE 23.47 45 46 SUPPLIES VEHICLE SUPPLIES VEHICLE 1,33- 157 .20 47 48 SUPPLIES VEHICLE 8.90- 4: 5 SUPPLIES VEHICLE 13.10 Z38.89 51 52 4746 040900 12/I2/88 ARNALS AUTO SERVICE REPAIR & MAINT/V 460.97 53 S4 REPAIR & MAINT/V 60.65 521.62 55 56 4747 4Z48 041000 -06091-2---- 12/12/88 12/t2l,8A ARNOLD DAVID 1 R HIH.1 9 UNIFORMS & CLOTH BROGRAM REG EEE-q- 83.93 Z-00 83.93 7-00 57 58 59 60 4749 061000 12/12/88 BANICK JOHN UNIFORMS & CLOTH PROGRAM SUPELIES 34.95 U 6 2 2 61 62 63 64 4750 061900 12/12/88 BATTERY TIRE WAREHOUSE SUPPLIES VEHICLE SUPELIES VEHICLE - 16,38 tfi. Zia 66 67 68 4751 070700 IZ/12/88 BERG.TORSETH SUPPLIES VEHICLE -29-4.0 32.16 32.16 69 70 71 72 4752 071900 12/12/88 BLACKS PHOTOGRAPHY FEES FOR TSE 16.67 73 74 SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 16.57 33.24 75 6 VOUCHREG 12/01/88 11:32 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER PAGE 5 VOUCHER/ 3 F4 CHECK E _ VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHFmftK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 6 4753 071910 12/12/88 BLACKSTONE -GAIL VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 41 « 0 7 8 9 -- TRAVEL & TRAIN 29.34 70.42 4754 080960 12/12/88 BODE N MARJORIE R PROGRAM REG FEES 7,00 7400 12 13 14 4755 081150 12/12/88 JOHN BOHL PROGRAM SUPPLIES 35.00 35.00 is 16 4756 0954.00 12/12/88 WORD PERFECT CORP.-5.0 UPDATE SUBS & MEMBERS 6.100 6.00 17 I8 4757 101400 12/12/88 BUILDERS SQUARE MAINT MATERIAL T7.51 19 TT. 51 20 21 4758 120100 12/12/88 C.C.SHARROW CO. SUPPLIES VEHICLE 157.00 zz 157.00 23 24 4759 140210 12/12/88 CLEAN-MATIC SUPPLIES JANITOR 200.00 200800 25 26 4760 140800 12/I2/88 COLLINS ELECTRIC REPAIR & MAINT/U 262.66 27 262.66 28 79 4761 142500 12/12/88 CORPORATE RISK MANAGEMENT FEES FOR SERVICE 150,00 30 150.00 31 32 33 4762 143500 12/12/88 CUSTOM FIRE REPAIR 3 MAINT/V 00 9 , 00 .90 00 34 4763 143800 12/12/88 DALCO SUPPLIES JANITOR 37 SUPPLIES JANITOR 205.64 381 SUPPLIES JANITOR 8.00- 306.64 39 40 4764 144600 12/12/88 DEMCO PROGRAM SUPPLIES 41.23 411 42 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 3.64 43 4765 230100 12/12/88 E.K.QUEHL SUPPLIES OFFICEF 988.98 988.98 45 47 5 5 4766 230900 12/12/88 EASTMAN KODAK CO. SUPPLIES OFFICE 10.00 40 49 7 SUPPLIES OFFICE 3.47 50 9 SUPPLIES O F F I C E 20,00 51 9 SUPPLIES OFFICE 26,00 52 33 SUPPLIES OFFICE 16.51 S4 SUPPLIES OFFICE 6.72 6.72 55 SUPPLIES OF: F I CE 57 -a QQ 3 SUPPLIES OFFICE Z8,40 57 4 DUPLICATING COSTS 96 99 59 5 -Dup IQATIN6 USTS 6 0 6t 6 DUPLICATING COSTS 193.98 ez .7 DUPLICATING COSTS 259.64 ,a DUPLICATINg Q OSTS 161.65 65 19 DUPLICATING COSTS 64.66 io DUPLIC.ATING COSTS 549.60 157 il DUPLICATING COSTS 274.81 1 s 784,60 Ise 69 i 2 53 4767 231625 12/IZ/88 EDSON DAVID UNIFORMS & CLOTH 70 20.00 71 S4 72 73 55 4768 240730 12/l2/88 ENEBAK CONSTRUCTION CO LAND IMPROVEMENT 3 OZ6.TO 74 56 '7 LAND IMPROVEMENT 17y098.48 75 I VOU A`s Z 11 12/01/88 11:32 I 2 3 4 5 7 9 IQ ii 12 13 14 15 16 17 la Is zc 21 22 2! ZA Z! 24 2', ZA 0 21 N 31 3. 3: 3' 3! 34 X 31 I 4, 4 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 6 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR Q D 1 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK MENDQ8 IJEM_ ITEM CHECK NUMBER _VENDQfj NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRip AMOUNT AMOUNT L A ND - I MPROVE M ENT ZQj4.44m,50 LAND IMPROVEMENT 63 LAND IMPROVEMENT 22 134,784.90 4769 260400 12/12/88 FAUST DANIEL TRAVEL TRAINING 140.00' VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 33.28 173.28 4770 260645 12/12/88 FIANDACA B PROGRAM REG FEES 7.00 7.00 4Z71 2.70300 I FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL SUPPLIES VLHICLEF1290 lo290.00 1 4772 270440 12/I2/88 FORTMEYER a LANG PRINTERS PROGRAM SUPPLIES 18.00 18.00 4773 270550 39ZIOQ 12/12/88 1 , 70 /I Z / flil FREDERICKSON ANN P PROGRAM REG FEES SUPPLIES VEHICLE 12,00 166.08 12.00 -4774 4775 310300 ..GENUINE 12/12/88 GOODYEAR TIRE COMPANY REPAIR & MAINT/V 38-,50 REPAIR & MAINILY 223- REPAIR & MAINT/V 119002 REPAIR & MAINT/V REPAIR & MAINT/V 119,002 112.02 REPAIR & MAINT/VEHC 119.02 REPAIR & MAINT/V REPAIR I MAINIL)l 119,02 REPAIR & MAINT/V 11900 REPAIR & MAINT/V HEPAIR & MAINILY 81064 112-07 REPAIR & MAINT/V 119.02 REPAIR & MAIN7/V REPAIR & MAINTIV 144.06 161-92- 4776 324325 I2/I2/88, GREW-HAYMAN JANET VEHICLE ALLOWANCE Y.Efil C L E ALLOWANCE 20.64 38,19- VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 16.80 VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 14.66 90.Z9 4777 47 7 2 350880 270100 12/12/88 12LI218-8 HOISINGTON GROUP,INC. HUTCHINSON ANN A/R MISC PROGRAM SUEELIES 992.50 992.50 VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 9.78 18.84 4779 3 TO 15 0 12/12/88 HUTCHINSON MARGE FEES 4780 390300 12/12/88 INDUSrRIAL SUPPLY SUPPLIES JANITOR 11.46 11.46 4781 3 401078 12/12/88 JENSEN GRACE L PROGRAM REG FEES 7.00 7.00 4 4 72 2 5 121.12/88 1 S -RIEP-AIR a_._,MAI_ftTlB _52,78 4783 461ZOO 12/I2/88 LESLIE PAPER SUPPLIES OFFICE 100.07 VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 7 12/01/88 11:32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER 1: Ilp Pl: r? T nn 1 1 2 VOUCHER/ 3 3 QHEC V E NDOR CHECK VENDOR I TEM ITEM CACK 4 4 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPT-ION AMOUNT AMOUNT 5 6 SUPPLIES OFFICE 14.30 7 a 7 SUPPLIES OFFICE 142.96 19 8 SUPPLIES OFFICE 257.33 1 9 SUPPLIES OFFICE 271.62 SUPPLIES OFFICE 128.66 13 SUPPLIES OFFICE 228.T4 14 15 SUPPLIES OFFICE 285.92 1 16 13 14 4T84 470700 12/12/88 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS PUBLISHING 154.69 17 19 15 LEGAL & FISCAL 51*78 70 16 PUBLISHING 194.22 21 17 PUBLISHING 44.00 2 2 . 444.69 23 18 24 19 4T85 500100 12/12/88 M,R.SIGN SUPPLIES VEHICLE 355.00 25 26 20 21 SUPPLIES VEHICLE 1.92 :35.6,92 27 28 22 4786 510600 12/12/88 MAPLEWOOD BOWL FEES FOR SERVICE 130..50 130.50 79 30 23 24 4787 510800 12/12/88 MAPLEWOOD PLUMBING HTG. OTHER CONST COSTS 19275.00 31 32 25 REPAIR & MAINT/E 5085 12$0.85 33 34 26 27 4788 511050 12/12/88 MARKIE CLAIRE PROGRAM REG FEES x'.00 35 T 36 37 29 4T89 520070 12/12/88 MCGRAW-HILL BOOK CO. BOOKS 46.99 39 30 BOOKS 2.66-- 44.33 40 31 32 4T90 33 521800 12/12/88 METRO INSPECTION SERVICE FEES FOR SERVICE 3 At 42 8 43 44 34 4791 'is 523200 12/12/88 MIDWESTERN MACHINERY BUILDING IMPROVEMENT 1 45 19615.00 46 m 4T92 540730 12/12/88 MN ASSN OF SOIL & WATER CONV BOOKS 35.00 47 35.00 48 37 49 3S 4793 570100 12/12/88 MOGREN BROS. MAINT MATERIAL 37.50 50 51 39 MAINT MATERIAL 31.25 68a75 52 40 41 4T94 570500 12/12/88 MOTOROLA, INC EQUIPMENT o*rHER 1 33 54 55 42 EQUIPMENJ OTHER ----- Q -13 44 EQUIPMENT OFFICEF222 222.00 109331,0.0 57 58 59 45 4125 !63005Q----,-- I /1Z/H--Av-Sx'.P.q-.- U-IILIIIES 6.60 Go 46 uTILITIES 15.38 61 62 47 UTILITIES 15.10 63 UTILITIES 7.75 64 49 UTILITIES 66.54 65 so uTILITIES 45075 67 51 UTILITIES 145OZ-7 68 69 52 UTILITIES 45.46 70 53 UTILITIES 14.76 71 .A UTILITIES 72 55 UTILITIES 52.46 73 74 56 wrILITIES 90.47 75 VOUCHREG 12/01/88 11:32 CIJ*Y OF MAPLEWOOD VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER C7 nQ 09: Q T n n i I PAGE 8 VOUCHER/ 3 CHECK VENDOR CHECK YENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK 4 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION UTILITIES AMOUNT 6Z.29 AMOUNT 5 6 7 a UTILITIES 3190 9 UTILITIES UTILITIES 3.90 2.75 :0 1 112 UTILITIES 2.75 f3 U T I L I T I E S UTILIIIE5 83.86 vs . 8 o 15 UTILITIES 72.30 17 UTILITIES UTILITIES 75.53 50.77 18 19 20 UTILITIES 99.51 21 UTILITIES UT I L I TIES 77.38 114.94 22 23 24 UTILITIES 112.73 25 UTILITIE S UTILITIES 114.99 l3s'[53m72 26 27 28 4T96 6!6Q IZLIZISS NOSDRUM SHIRLEY UTILITIES FROQRAM BEG EEES 1 7400 16,354.09 7.00 29 30 31 32 4797 660800 1262/e8 NORTH ST$l PAUL CITY OF OTHER CONST COSTS UTILITES 2 66.00 33 35 UTILITES 128-.10 37 UTILITIES 954.60 3 623.70 38 39 40 4798 68060 12/12/88 OCTOPUS CAR WASH REPAIR t MAINT/V 12.26 41 REPAIR & MAINT/V REPAIR I MAINTI-V- 153.25 42 43 as REPAIR & MAINT-/V 181,39 45 REPAIR & MALNT/v REPA IR & MA lNT'lV- 6.13 A. I fl 47 48 REPAIR & MAINT/V 6.13 49 so REPAIR & MAINT/V 6o,13 239.07 51 4799 691140 12/12/88 OLSON THEA PROGRAM REG FEES 14.00 14.00 53 54 480-0 691600 12112ZSS OSTER ANIIR EA_ --- IR Al E L TRAIN 22-12 55 56 4201 7 10 fi Fri 0 121132 RCREFN TE-Cil. TRAVEL & TRAIN PHEIGRAM SUPELIES 2.81 1-140-00 30.9 9 130.00 57 58 59 60 4802 710655 12/12/88 PERFORMANCE COMPUTER FORMS SUPPLIES OFFICEF421.75 421.75 421.75 61 62 63 64 4803 4804 710800 711450--- I2/I2/88 1211 PET CONNECTION CTION P14IRPS --RU-TH PROGRAM SUPPLIES FEES FOR SERVICE 9.27 24-50 9.27 5 66 67 68 4805 711500 12/12/88 PHOTOS TO GO FEES FOR SERVICE 13.01 69 70 71 FEES FOR SERVICE 19.89 73 74 FEES FOR SERVICE 19.11 53.76 76 75 VOUCHREG CITY OF MAP LEWOOD PAGE 9 12/01 /88 11:32 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER C nG GL" C5 T i1t1 4 1 12 VOUCHER/ 1 z 3 u C VEND � - L T� � � 4 NUMBER .5 NUMBER DATE NAME DCJCR iN "fION AMOUNT AMOUNT 5 R 6 4.8 7 712 12/12/88 PI TNEY B OWES _ O UTSIDE RENTAL EOU1 P 7 7 I8 4807 9 721100 12/12/88 PRIEBE WILLIikM M. MEMBERSHIP 12.00 12.00 9 „ ,° 4808 E „ 721300 12/12/88 PROFESSI PROCESS FEES FOR SERVICE 92.33 92.33 1.3 'z 4 09 721550 12/12/88 PROULX LOREL E PROGRAM REG FEES 12.00 12.00 15 16 +! 17 1 14 4810 TS 722330 12 PUGLEASA AURORA PROGRAM REG FEES 7. 00 7,00 10 19 ,5 4811 741300 12/12/88 RAMSEY CLINIC EXAMINATION 43.00 21 1 i 17 19 FEES FOR SERVICE 43.00 86.00 22 2 3 24 19 4812 20 741560 12/12/88 RAMSEY COUNTY FEES FOR SERVICE 24.00 24.00 25 26 21 4813 751350 12/12/88 RICHARDS PROGRAM SUPPLIES 31.78 3 1.78 28 22 29 23 4814 24 761600 12/12/88 BONS PRINTING SUPPLIES OFFICE 72.49 72.49 31 32 25 4815 26 770900 12/12/88 RYDE.R TRANSPORTATION OUTSIDE RENTAL EQUIP 300000 300 000 33 34 27 4816 750200 12/12/88 S &S GRAFTS FE ES FOR SERVICE 59.66 59 35 37 29 4817 30 780790 12/12/88 SCHULTZ KATHRYN PROGRAM REG FEES i2.00 12,00 9 40 31 32 4818 810800 12/12/88 SIGN CENTER PROGRAM SUPPLIES 19600 1.910 4 } 42 33 34 4819 820400 12/12/8 SM I SEK MYRA F EES FOR SERVICE 00 15 .0 43 44 45 35 4820 36 820600 12/12/88 SNAP -ON TOOLS MAINT MATERIAL 149.00 149.00 a6 47 48 37 4821 38 820650 12/12/88 SNYDER'S DRUG SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 16 .72 16.72 49 50 39 4822 831600 12/12/88 SPS OFFI PR ODUCTS SUPPLIES OFF ICE 9 .05 31 32 ao 41 SUPPLIES OFFICE 4680 93 42 EQUIPMENT OFF I CEF86 9.16 869.16 s 43 44 SUPPLIES OFFICE I71.12 57 45 SUPPLIES OFFICE 154.51 9 s o 46 47 SUPPLIES OFFICE 11.18 61 48 SUPPLIES OFFICE 11.88 62 63 ae 49 SUPPLI OFFICE 91.78 51 SUPPLIES OFFICE 49.56 67 _. 8UP PL_x_E5 OFF 0 68 52 3 SUPPLIES OFFICE 69.50 B9 70 SUPPLIES OFFICE 11.04 71 _..._ _ , ___ _ SUPPLIES O E F ICE 16 4 72 55 56 SUPPLIES OFF 16,43 • 73 74 57 SUPPLIES OFFICE 5.36 75 VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 12/01/88 11:32 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER PAGE 10 cum cr"a" VOUCHER/ CHECK 4 3 CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM-- 5 4 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 6 SUPPUES QEEICE l SUPPLIES OFFICE 13.56 19921.44 9 10 482.3 840400 ST.PAUL CITY OF REPAIR I MAINTIR- 5Z.70 it 12 13 10 REPAIR & MAI NT' /E 436.60 14 11 REPAIR & MAINT/E SEPAIR & MAINIZE 1 713,07- Is 16; 12 REPAIR & MAINT/R T67.00 17 18 13 14 TRAVEL & TRAIN FEES -FOR SERV I CE 1 4 849 OZ 19 20 15 16 17 4824 4824 840500 DISPATCH PIONEER PUBLISHING 110.80 110.80 21 zz 23 24 1s 75 19 4825 842100 12/12/8$ STANDARD SPRING S ALIGNMENT REPAIR & MAINT/V 1.56.515 156.55 26 27 20 21 4826 9 1 Sj gFr--EN SCUTT PROG-RAM SUPPLIE S 335.00 35.00 z8 29 ------ 30 22 �23 24 4827 850855 12/12/88 SWENSON LINDA PROGRAM REG FEES 4.QO 4.00 31 U 33 25 4828 860100 1 12/88 T J AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES VEHICLE 105400 m 26 SUPPLIES VEHICLE S LIEP L I ES VEHICLE 97.69 38-46 35 36 37 zo SUPPLIES VEHICLE 12.38 38 1 29 30 SUPPLIES VEHICLE 1 El; VEHICLE 66.42 2 9-97- 2 19-213 39, 40 41 31 S2 4829 61554 861550 12/12/88 TESLIE RUTH RECD PEES 7.00 7.00 42 43 33 4830 881500 12/12/88 TWIN CITY FILTER SERVICE SUPPLIES JANITOR 92.42 92.42 45 46 47 35 48 36 882500 12/17/88 IWIN Cl- V TESTING ulffaTDE ENG FEES 26.00 49 37 4231 OUTSIDE ENG FEES 57.00 50 38 39 OUTSIDE . ENG FEES 114.00 207.00 51 52 53 40 4832 900100 12/12/88 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS & CLOTH 17.05- u 41 42 UNIFORMS & CLOTH r. I-- Q I H 42.25 I I - c) rA 5 :6 57 43 UNIFORMS & CLOTH 166.75 58 44 45 UNIFORMS & CLOTH UUIEQRMS & rt-QlH 80.85 145 - 55- 59 60 61 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 25.20 460.60 1512 63 47 no 64 4R22 211ROO I ZZIZZ AR VINCENJ JUDITH 65 49 50 51 4834 931500 12/12/88 WALTERS CLIMATE, INC SUPPLIES JANITOR 8.40 8.40 67 68 69 52 4835 940550 12/12/88 WEHRMAN SERGLY ASSOCIATES INC FEES CONSULTING 740.22 70 71 53 FEES CONSUL'rING 918.05 72 FEES aNS-UL 55 56 FEES CONSULTING 97.74 2733.45 1 74 75 76 .... ...... .. - -._ __ — ._: _ �'• . -.. e ..-- v �-. -... .5x wroe. «..'{`nsv'°!xr..•rwnr:, .w.nrr:^+�trc<9... •va.A 1' CH�tEG C I T Y Cif MAPLEWOi. D PAGE 11 Vk.�U r CHR G 11:3:' VOUCIA R /C•!-1ECK RE 12/ .. 1 2 VOUCHER/ D O R C H E G K VENDOR ....... I TEM -- _ _. - -- -. -_ ____ IT EM _. -_ 3 CHECK 5 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DL-SC:Rip AMOUNT AMOUNT 8 7 4836 12/ W_ESCO S ES J ANITOR 99 .5 3 a 9 _940700 � SUFPL I ES J ANI f OR 36.69 136 10 4 537 9 424-5 0 12 /12 /8 8 WILLS PHYL PROGRAM REG FEES 7.00 11 7.00 12 4833 943504 12/12/88 WOLFGRAM- KNUTS ARCHITECTS COMM DEV MI SC 157-00 14 157.00 15 16 4G3� 5+$0700 1 7 / 12/88 YOCUM OIL CO - INVENTORY Off' SUPPLI 3, 493.00 3 3.00 17 18 19 434 9 80400 12/12/88 KATHRYN A. ZAWaCi I TR AVEL & TRAIN _ 45 .0' 10 21 TRAVEL & TRAIN 45.09 90.18 zz 4541 98 0850 1 2/12/88 ZIE NTARA JOHN PROGRAM REG FEES 17.00 Z3 17.00 24 25 26 TOTAL CHECKS V 600 874.81 28 29 S 1 30 31 32 33 5 5 34 35 36 37 8 9 0 39 40 41 1 2 3 42 43 44 i 45 4 5 b 4G'. 47'. 48 49 7 , 9 50 51 52 53 0 l 1 54 55 56 57 L4 bS so 59 80 61 b6 17 i8 62 63 65 19 50 51 5z 53 _ _ 66 67 68 71 n 73 55 56 74 75 76 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 11/18/88 CHECK #6044 - CHECK #6268 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY MCGUIRE,.MICHAEL A. 2 1 538.46 BLACKSTONE, GAIL 1 ZAWACKI, KATHRYN 826.90 BERM, LOIS N. 942.10 JAHN, DAVID J. 798.19 SWANSON, LYLE 926.31 CUDE, LARRY J. 242.40 OSTER,'ANDREA J. 817.66 MIKISKA., WILLIAM 157.60 FAUST, DANIEL F. 1 TAYLOR, LINDA 744.60 MATHEYS, ALANA K. 1 VIGNALO, DELORES A. 949.66 ANDERSON, CAROLE J. 1 LA MOTTE, MARLENE 258.50 AURELIUS, LUCILLE E. 1 SELVOG, BETTY D. 383.63 SCHADT, JEANNE L. 977.22 KELSEY, CONNIE L. 619.92 HOSCHKA, GERMAINE 630.92 VIETOR, LORRAINE S. 926.26 HENSLEY, PATRICIA A. 588.01 CARLE, JEANETTE E. 875.37 RONGSTAD, CAROLEE 199.50 HAAS, E. 81.38 LING, I. 86.63 LIBHARDT, M. 100.38 LUTTRELL, S: 104.50 MORTENSEN, B. 89.25 KAUP, L. 86.63 JONES, S. 80.06 ERICKSON, P. 81.38 EDDY, B. 89.25 MCDONALD, M. 89.25 LIEDER, M. 82.69 BEHR, N. 99.75 TRACY, K. 90.56 MALLET, D. 93.50 GOLASKI, D. 74.81 BIEBIGHAUSER, K. 99.00 MYCKLEBY -LANG, R. 86.63 KLEBE, E. 81.38 STELLA, F. 89.25 WIDHOLM, J. 84.00 PODGORSKI, A. 81.38 KING, H. 97.13 GETTY, 0, 86.63 MOWCHAN, G. 80.06 HAAS, T. 81.38 WIEGERT, E. 88.00 LING, T. 86.63 HENDRICKS, B. 82.69 DITTEL - , K. 89.25 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 11/18/88 CHECK #6044.- CHECK #6268 EMPLOYEE NAME WARNER, C LACASSE, A. LOFGREN, R. ZUERCHER, G. ARBUCKLE, C. FREDERICKSON, R. GETTY, JR. ,. R. EARLEY, M. LOFGREN, D. PRIGGE, L. BERQUAL, C. BURKE, M. WIEGERT, D. BROADY, D. ARBUCKLE, J. MILLER, A. LIPINSKI, J. DICKSON, H. COTTRELL, J. ANDERSON, E. WOLSZON , 'M . WOLD, M. LEE, M. HAYNES, M. SCHNELLMAN, W. WATSON, M. BERGLUND, B. OLSON, M. LOCKE, G.. SCHIPP, D. HEALY, C. F I SCH ER, L. WOLSZON, R. SUPAN, K. FASTNER, D. FOSBURGH, A. THOMPSON, P. WERDEN, P. COLLINS, KENNETH V. RICHIE, CAROLE L. SVENDSEN, JOANNE M. NELSON, ROBERT D. FULLER, ELAINE OMATH, JOY E. MARTINSON, CAROL F. ZAPPA, JOSEPH A. STILL, VERNON T. SKALMAN, DONALD W. NELSON, CAROL M. MORELLI, RAYMOND J. STEFFEN, SCOTT L. ARNOLD, DAVID L. BANICK, JOHN J. GROSS PAY 93.50 81.38 86.63 81.38 93,50 89.25 95.81 84.00 99.75 80.06 84.00 81.38 99.75 84.00 88.00 84.00 81.38 82.69 81.38 111.56 85.25 99.00 90.56 99.75 81.38 90.56 133.88 97.13 90.56 89.25 86.63 176.00 84.00 88.00 95.81 86.63 93.50 93.50 1,996.50 819.26 1,108.67 1,735.70 314.03 834.46 804.06 1,561.48 1 1,403.88 1,511.08 1,378.28 1,522.44 1,561.49 1,386.75 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 11 /18/88 CHECK #6044 = CHECK #6268 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY ----- - - - - -- ----------- BOHL, JOHN C. 1 CAHANES, ANTHONY G. 1 CLAUSON, DALE K. 1 MOESCHTER, RICHARD M. 1 ATCHISON- JOHN H. 1 PELTIER, WILLIAM F. 1 SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS J. 1,504.42 WELCHLIN, CABOT V. 1 LANG, RICHARD J. 1 PALMA, STEVEN T. 1,153.01 HERBERT, MICHAEL J. 1 DREGER, RICHARD C. 1 MEEHAN, JR., JAMES E. 1 STAFNE, GREGORY L. 1 BECKER, RONALD D. 1 HALWEG, KEVIN R. 2. STOCKTON, DERRELL T. 1 PAULOS, J R., PAUL G. 1 88 BOWMAN, RICK A. 1 KARIS, FLINT D. 1 HEINZ, STEPHEN J. 1 GRAF, DAVID M. 1 THOMALLA, DAVID J. 1 YOUNGREN, JAMES G. 1 RAZSKAZOFF, DALE E. 1 VORWERK, ROBERT.E. 1 BERGERON, JOSEPH A. 1 MELANDER, JON A. 1 ENGEN, MARIA 225.23 MURNANE, SARAH 225.23 EMBERTSON, JAMES M. 1 WILLIAMS, DUANE J. 1 RABINE, JANET L. 1 STAHNKE, JULIE A. 1 BOYER, SCOTT K. 937.54 RYAN, MICHAEL P. 1,857.93 FEHR, JOSEPH 799.90 NELSON, KAREN A. 1 FLAUGHER, JAYME L. 1 HAIDER, KENNETH G. 1 CHLEBECK, JUDY M. 986.46 WEGWERTH, JUDITH A. 411.48 MEYER, GERALD W. 1 KANE, MICHAEL R. 1 LUTZ, DAVID P. 1 KLAUSING, HENRY F. 1 SCHMOOCK, JOHN 890.81 HELEY, RONALD J.. 1 OSWALD, ERICK D. 1 FREBERG, RONALD L. 1 CASS, WILLIAM C. 1 LINDBLOM, RANDY 848.86 ELIAS., JAMES G. 11563.92 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 11/18/88 CHECK #6044 - CHECK #6268 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY ------- - - - - -- PECK, DENNIS L. ----- - - - - -- 1 PRIEBE, WILLIAM 1 IRISH, BRUCE A. 1 GESSELE, JAMES T. 1 GEISSLER, WALTER M. 1 METZ, TERRY 848.86 LOFGREN, JOHN R. 926.31 ODEGARD, ROBERT D. 1 BRENNER, LOIS J. 968.86 KRUMMEL, BARBARA A. 417.23 STAPLES, PAULINE 1 JONES, LUTHER 72.00 TRAVERS, DANIEL L.. 94.50 ANDERSON, ROBERT S. 1 LINDORFF, DENNIS P. 1 GARRY, WILLIAM 783.26 HELEY, ROLAND B. 1 MARUSKA, MARK A. 1 BURKE, MYLES R. 1 GERMAIN, DAVID A. 1 WICKLEM, B. 5.00 MISKELL, C. 25.00 SHELDON, L. 40.00 RICCI. S. .30.00 PODPESKAR, K. 45.00 STROTH, T. 56.00 VAN WYK; K. 27.50 WILHELMSON, Co 37.50 ANDERSON., C. 50.00 BESETH, JR., R. 36.25 WILHELMSON, T. 37.50 KING, S. 22.50 NELSON, J. 40.00 FISCHER,. P. 142.50 WARD, ROY G. 406.40 TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS J. 1, GREW- HAYMAN, JANET M. 1,024.86 NELSON, JEAN 314.03 HORSNELL, JUDITH A. 502.83 HUTCHINSON, ANN E. 440.43 BARTA MARIE L. 804.06 DOHERTY, KATHLEEN M. 971.44 OLSON, GEOFFREY W. 1,786.10 MISKELL, NANCY 161.52 LIVINGSTON, JOYCE L. 421.07 GENEROUS, ROBERT 308.21 EKSTRAND, THOMAS G. 1 JOHNSON, RANDALL L. 1 OSTROM, MARJORIE 1 CARVER, NICHOLAS N. 1,138.46 WENGER, ROBERT J. 1 LACASSE, CASEY 210.00 NADEAU, EDWARD A. 11208.70 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 11/18/88 CHECK #6044 - CHECK #6268 4 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY --- - - - - -- - -- NAGEL, BRYAN ----------- 898.12 MULWEE, GEORGE W. .1 1 104.86 NUTESON, LAVERNE S. .1 BREHEIM, ROGER W. 1 EDSON, DAVID B. 1 MULVANEY, DENNIS M. 1 SPREIGL GEORGE C. 1 ------------ $166,704.37 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION Z1 $ 6 CITY & COUNTY EMP CR UNION Cl 22,607.00 AFSCME 2725 U1 442.35 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS 19 -3988 160.00 MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION I1 516.66 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM Z2 247.00 ------------ $ 30,882.52 GRAND TOTAL $197,586.89 AGENDA NO. I — , AGENDA REPORT T0: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: Budget Transfer - Finance Department DATE: December 5, 1988 INTRODUCTION A budget transfer from the contingency account to the budget for the Finance Department is needed for insurance consultant costs and software modifications. BACKGROUND The City's annual contract with Corporate Risk Managers, Inc. is based on an estimated four days of work at $520 per day. At the . end of the contract period, a.billing adjustment is made for actual hours worked. The adjustment this year is an additional charge of $1,560 for 24 hours of unanticipated time. This additional charge was incurred because preparation of the specifications and analysis of the bids took longer than anticipated. A budget transfer from the contingency account is needed to finance this additional charge. During the implementation of the accounts receivable software, it was discovered that modifications to the software were required.. These modifications involved changes in the format of the bills and the automatic printing of second and final notices. Since. the need for these modifications was unanticipated, no money was included in the original budget to finance them. Therefore, a budget transfer of $2,880 is needed from the contingency account. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that a $4,440 budget transfer from the General Fund Contingency Account be approved. COUNCIL ACTION It is recommended that the Council. 1. Approve a $1,560 transfer from the General Fund Contingency Account to Account 101 - 201 -4480 for insurance consultant costs. 20 Approve a $2,880 transfer from the General Fund Contingency Account to Account 101 - 202 -4480 for accounts receivable software modifications. DFF:1 nb t _ Y I AGENDA I TEM AGENDA REPORT Act on by Count -il TO: City Manager^ FROM: Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Final Acceptance--- -Fr^o,j ec t s 86-11, 86 21, 87-10 y Pei ectec��.( 87-37, and 88 -06 DATE: December 6, 1988 The subject projects are complete. It is recommended that each project shoal d be accepted and any escrow be released. A resolution for each i nd i v i dUal project final acceptance x. s attached,, iw Attachments RESOLUTION ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT . . WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood, Minnesota has determined that Highwood Addition, City Project 86~^ 11 is complete and recommends acceptance of the project; ' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA that City Project 86-11 is complete and maintenance of these improvements is accepted by the city. Release of any retainage or escrow is hereby authorized. RESOLUTION- ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT WHEREAS, the city manager +or the City o+ Maplewood' has determined that Til sera's 14th Addition, City Project 86--21 is complete and recommends acceptance of the project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL MAPLEWOOD , MINNESOTA, that City Project 86--21 'i's complete and maintenance of these improvements is accepted by the city. Release of any reta i nage or escrow is hereby authorized* RESOLUTION ACCEPTANCE 'OF PROJECT WHEREAS, the cit engineer for the Cit of Maplewood has determined that Highwood Estates, Cit Pro 87-10 is complete and recommends acceptance of the project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that Cit Project B7-10 is complete and maintenance of these improvements is accepted b the cit Release of an retainage or escrow is hereb authorized* RESOLUTION ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT .. WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has determined that Parkway Terrace, City Project 87-37 is complete and recommends acceptance of the project; . . ' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that City Project 87-37 is complete and maintenance of these improvements is accepted by the city. Release of any retainage or escrow is hereby authorized. W RESOLUTION ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT WHEREAS, the cit engineer for the Cit of MAplewood has .determined that Larpenteur at T.H. 120--Water Main Extens 'ion , Cit Project 88-06 is complete and recommends acceptance of the project NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CIT-Y COUNCIL'OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNES-OTA, that Cit Project 88-06 is complete and maintenance of these improvements is accepted b the cit Release of an retainage or escrow is hereb authorized.. � E -- '/ _/ Agenda Item Ac by Council-:J MEMORANDUM �ordor sed___... Moa 6 1 f *1 e�--�---- Be�ected_______ TO: City Manager Datt FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: MWCC Joint Use Rental Agreement DATE: December 6, 1988 Attached is an agreement renewal for rental payments to the oity. This is a continuing agreement that must be renewed each year, It is recommended the city council authorize executing the renewal j w Att achment STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT RENEWAL ' a t JOINT USE RENTAL, AGREEMENT NO. 150 .. The Metropolitan Waste Control commission and the City of Maplewood agree to renew the Joint Use Rental Agreement No 150 under the same terms and conditions contained in the Agreement which is currently in force between these parties. The g renewal period for Joint Use Rental Agreement No. 150 shall be January, 1988 - December 31, 1988. That both parties agree to the renewal period and terms is evidenced by the signatures affixed to this statement. FOR.THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Name and Title Name and Title Date THE METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION P er Meint Wilrman Lours J. Br 'mhurst, Ch ie Administrator Date PEM:LJB:LRB:kmw 11.10.87 RENEWAL MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Associate Planner--Johnson SUBJECT: Correct Resolution--Street Vacation LOCATION: Sterling Street, West of Ski Jump Property DATE: December 1 1988 The legal description that appears in the February 22, 1988 Council minutes for the vacation of Sterling Street right-of-way is too vague as to the amount of right-of-way that was vacated. (See the recommendation for this description.) This problem was brought to staff's attention by an employee of Ramsey County when this person attempted to update the county's base maps to show the recently approved Maplewood Highlands plat (south of PI easantvi ew Park) A corrective resolution needs to be recorded to clarify the legal description for the vacated right-of-way so that the Maplewood Highlands plat can be officially entered onto the County's base map and so the County can update the legal description for the property that adjoins to the east. The vacation legal description also needs to be clarified to eliminate the possibility of any future title problems for the owners of the adjoining properties. Amend the February 22, 1988 Council minutes and authorize the resolution on page 6 to be sent to Ramsey County to revise the legal description in resolution 88-2-20 that pertains to the vacation of the portion of the unimproved Sterling Street right -of -way. The revised legal description shall read as follows (new language is underlined and old language is crossed out). 825-fee+- sod +�r -&--fSe-NE-eor ner-of- +he- SE-+,-v All of the Sterlin Street right-of-wa -that is located in the south half of Section 13, Township 28,___ Ra_nqe .2 which is south of the south line of the following described property and south of the easterly extension of said south line: the north 487.99 MOL feet of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 13, Township 28, mb/ sterling Attachments: 1. Property Line Map 2. plat Map 3. 2-22-88 Resolution 4. Proposed Corrective Resolution I ML - + • % � "•,� tat__•• • • ..... L •. • • ?.. r`_�. :� 1 e.t _•: 1 is its %Now .L: ..,,.�.., .- :Highwood Ave. -- •- .._ , .. ,•. .- see • • . En• w . l � sVt � 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 � n we 1`• J yr •A • • i 1 t 1 1 vi so Vr f 1W I 14 1b . � •f 1 •� w _ : IL,,,>r ay r s •� 1 i 1 LS / 1 1 1 •. • ' / too Is It 401 :�. �► � ' � ._ ... 1 i j I t _ O � J• ++.• _ �, 1 q • � See FW 1 - 1 L /• I I Lam..,. +.I 1 1 ► �` I I _ IL lot C _ •` _ • .ate • 1 '� r• Z ` h• � • l t I • �" T'.r'�.r1 r.•� Ir • a•, w e i �,�_. �� .le ; +••; �•` i i 1 1 1 t im C l R STA40 AA— MW fe M�rfE ■��1•ElRf�ilf•�>l�i���>t!' � 1 i11 1 - ' I 1 -Pleasant View Pa 4 r 1 ►� 1 1 % % Ni Plat �'' �� ; ;; sit 'N. r e *Lap r 'Williams Broth •��'' • .. N ,,.. ' Sterl i ng Street ROW Brothers , M •... , , �• ,, Pipe Li ne • Vacated 2 -22 -88 . .._.� � I r ' Gonyea s Oak Heights Plats' � - .. i . I -� •- � , , «, -. • �•�» - - ` • , i 1 ; St. Paul Ski C l u b , • y • • ' •- '�• ' "� '` ' Highlands 1 A. 1 :�� : •. Maplewood H• �• i ts - Plat der • 11. It .- • .� ti �� •` , i1Eit >r »>f � tea i !• ■ • V M 1 nas $I 6 �! . »M. • T �11K a,.. Existing substandard -_ �'�l but no public ri ht –o 'N"I F . 1 ell .•r •y • r • W . • w • !• . �.'� a.a.. • 4 �w • fit 0 . •• • L.•/ SIP. aft 1h • (so • w • tom.. +� �a.s 3 - �i7 .)• �ji � fit) /wi :•..�� !!u. j �y ,� • •� M Vat • • 60 'Sit C �, , -al.. .. T.•�; —•-... .. I ... .� 7 TEhEtFk. -- CA R R � ee --- AVE 4M ,` .•• ! «.. 3/ ••• Sys fir .- 1 I~ LIM • f 17 • .1 ` • • •�� rr �� �• 1 � � roadway, J . f –way. ' low 10 • • • I .•• h' • , a -Joao • t 4 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 2 Attachment 1 4 N ... � ,....... �... ... . . ... .. ..... ._ ...,� .. _,v._:.. f - �:..c.r_ :...... _- Y.::.?i. .x �'a .r.- ..:�rC• �. _ .n.u_ .i�s ,r ... .tti�:$:.+��i...�.0 .., tie.t..,.a.r_..u....`�.....c..� Yl ........x.:4'`5 t.s_. .te . , k, t- c.a__...a�;tt. ....ev. .. s ..mot , o... 4 PLEASANT VIEW PARK U RJUTAL 11M I Ll ;4V Y IM OR MOM- h 'Maplewood Hi ghl ands Development 3 Attachment Z Q N t ORIGINAL RESOLUTION AS ADOPTED 2 -22 -88 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City .. $ g y Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council Chambers in said City on the 22nd day of February, 1988, at 7 :00 P.M. The following members were present: . John C. Greavu, Mayor Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Gary W. Bastian,'Councilmember Frances L. Juker, Councilmember George W. Rossbach, Councilmember The following members were absent: None Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 88 -2 -20 WHEREAS, Maplewood Highlands Development Corporation initiated proceedings g to vacate the public interest in the following- described property: Sterling Street ' from the following p point center line point to a 825 feet south: The NE corner of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 13, ,township 28, range 22. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. A majority of the owners of property abutting said street vacation have signed a petition for this vacation; 2. This vacation was reviewed by the Planning Commission on February 1, 1988, The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that this vacation be approved. 3. The City Council held a public hearing on Februar y 22, 1988 to con- sider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be herd and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above- described street right -of -way, public interest in the property will accrue to the following-described abutting g properties: 1. The South 825 feet of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, 2. Except the North 806 feet of the North 1741 feet of the W 1/2 of the SE 1/4, lying easterly of the center line of Sterlin g Street and Northwesterly of I -494, subject to roads and easements in Sec- w tion 13, Township 28, Range 220 NOW, THEREFORE BE -IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that it is in the public interest to grant the above- described vacation on the basis of the following findings of fact: . . 4 .. Attachment 3 1. Construction of street at a safe grade across the steep slope in this area would be cost. prohibitive. 2. The properties. that abut this wa right-of - can be accessed from other g Y improved streets. LI j i t y Ayes - all. Seconded b Councilmember Rossbach. y STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified .and appointed Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the 22nd day of February, 1988, with the original on file in my office and the same is a.full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to vacation of this street right -of -way. Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this 15th day of September, 1988. kl r rj City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 5 CORRECTIVE VACATION RESOLUTION Pursuant to due call and notice thereof# a re meetin of the Cit Council of the Cit of Maplewood# Minnesota was dul called and held in the Council Chambers in said Cit on the 12th da of December 1988, at 7 p. m. The followin members were present: The followin members were 'absent : moved its adoption: introduced the followin resolution and WHEREAS, the Cit of Maplewood initiated proceedin to revise resolution 88-2-20 (vacation of a portion of Sterlin Street ri to correct the le description for the portion of the ri that wa vacated on Februar 22, 19882 WHEREAS, the le descriptions for the affected properties were properl identified in Resolution 88-2-20P but the le description for the vacated ri was too va as to the amount of ri vacatede NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that it is in the public interest to revise the le description in Resolut-ion 88-2-20 that pertains to the vacated portion of Sterlin Street ri to read as follows: All of the Sterlin Street ri that is located in the south half of Section 13, Township 28, Ran 22 which is south of the south line of the followin g -described propert and south of the easterl extension of said south line: the north 487.99 MOL feet of the SE 1/4 of the Sw 1/4 of Section 13, Township 28, Ran 22. Seconded b Councilmember Rossbach. A - all STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY We CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Attachment 4 Is the undersi bein the dul q ualified and appo-inted. Clerk of the Cit of Maplewood# Minnesota# do hereb certif that I,bave care1ull compared the attached and fore extract of minutes of a re meetin of the Cit of Maplewoodv held on the da of 1988.* with the ori on file in m office and the same is a fulls true and complete transcript nscript. therefrom insofar as the same relates to vacation of this street ri .of—wa Witness m hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the Cit this da of IF198810 Cit Clerk Cit of Maplewood. Minnesota 7 Aet 1. on by C MEMORANDUM Endo _-rse '1...1_ M 1 odJ f o Re ected— TO: Cit Manager Date FROM: Director of Communit Development SUBJECT: Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit LOCATION: Lower Afton and McKnight Roads APPLICANT: So B. Multi -Famil Fund 11 Limited Partnership OWNER: Arnold En Johnson DATE: November 16, 1988 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Re e The . applicant is re approval of I a A plan amendment from LSC. SC, service commercials I imited service commercial , to 2. A conditional use permit development (PUD)s Descri-pLion of the Project The PUD would consist of (CUP) for a planned unit 1 a A 33,600-s retail center including four to six gas dispensers on two isl ands o 152 rental townhouse uni ts and community center* The 2 it communit center would include a swimming pool, part room, E itchen o++ ice , exercise room and whirl pool Reason for Re g uests The plan amendment is re because the LSC designation limits the number of g as dispensers to two on one island. The developer would lik- e more than two dispensers. The SC designation has no limits 28 The CUP is re because the proposed retail site is zoned C0 commercial office g and LBC limited business. commercial. This zoning limits the site to office and da care use. The CO zone allows limited.retail - use onl when it is an incidental use to an office building. The proposed townhouse site is zoned F farm residential . The F zone is I imited to single dwelling and agricultural uses. The zoning ordinance, however allows a PUD in an zoning district b CUP& CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL . . There are no specific criteria for a plan amendment decision. Any change in the land use plan should be consistent with the goal s, policies and objectives in the City ~s comprehensive plaan. Section 36-442 (b) of City Code requires that approval of a conditional use permit shall be based upon ten findings. (Refer to the findings in the resolution on page 28~) BACKGROUND OF THE SITE The City approved the development of this site for 375 apartment and townhouse units in 1971. In 1983, the City Council amended the plan to LSC''and rezoned the corner to CO to encourage commercial services convenient to residents and increase the tax ' base. The City Council did not approve a request by the property owner to rezone the site to R-3 multiple dwelling. No specific development had been proposed* DISCUSSION ' t diffi lt decision b a se of the strong This project presents a cu ec u neighborhood opposition. The commercial center is planned for a neighborhood scale. A plan amendment for additional gas pumps is inconsistent with City policy. The center itself is consistent with the land use plan and the City's intent to provide convenient commercial services on this corner for area residents. The CO zoning district limits the site to office uses and does not accomplish this goal . The residential part of this project is consistent with the City's housing goals and land use plan. It would assist in meeting the City's modest-cost housing goals for 1990. The project is adjacent to multi-family housing on the east and south. There has been opposition to the rental aspect of this project. The City attorney has advised us that this is not a legal basis to deny a project. RECOMMENDATION 1. Deny the plan amendment from LSC to SC on the basis that this is a neighborhood commercial center and the City's policy is to limit gas sales in these locations to two dispensers on one ' island. 2. Approve the resolution on page 28 approving a conditional use permit for e PUD on the basis that the ten findings for a conditional use permit would be met. Approval is subject to the fo1lowing conditions: as The development shall adhere to the plans and conditions approved by the Community Design Review Board, except that the density must , comply with the City's 2 comprehensive plan. Future changes to the plans must be approved by the Board, . b. All commercial uses shall conform with the BC(M) (business commercial [modified]) zoning district ` requirements Restaurants and a - +uel station with no more than two gas dispensers on one island shall also be allowed, provided that the City's parking requirements are met. On- sale liquor shall not be allowed. c. External speakers and lighting shall be directed away from dwelling units and the sound shall not exceed 50 decibels (normal conversation level), and light shall baa shielded and not exceed five foot-candles at the property d. There shall be no exterior storage or sale of goods. or merchandise. us. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. A six month time extension may be requested as allowed in Section 36-442(,d) of City code. f. There shal*i be no vents for the underground fuel tanks within 200 feet of a residential property line or the buildable area of the planned residential development. g. The type and anchoring of underground storage tanks shall be approved by the City Fire Marshal, The tanks shall be strapped to a concrete slab" 3. Authorize staff to request a traffic study from Ramsey County to determine if improvements will be needed at the McKnight and Lower Afton Roads intersection prior to the construction of this project. � CITIZEN COMMENTS Cit staff surve the 317 propert owners within 350 feet of the site. Of the 129 rep ies ten were in favor, nine had no comment, and 110 were opposed. The principal objections w ere Traffic: The development would make an already bad, tra+f is situation worsen Overcrowding: The area is so overcrowded now, that more people would make it unbearable& Sufficient availability of existing apartments/townhouses: There are currently enough apartments, prefer single-dwellingso Sufficient availability of commer space: There is enough retail shopping in the area at Sun Ra and Valle Creed:: shopping centers a Property values: It would make propert harder to sell and decrease propert valuell Natural area: It would chase wild l,i+e from the area and ruin the wilderness viewe Other negative comments centered around potential tax increases and an increase in vandalism and litter. Respondents generall e higher densit development with lower propert values, increased traffic and undesirable q ualities of multifamil inhabitants. A summar of neighborhood concerns is on page -23.)u There were also several letters in opposition from residents be the 350-+oot mailing. While Mary Anderson Construction wrote in opposition (page 26) , three other developers in the "leg" - Gon y ea Compan Good Value Homes and ,ref +erson Homes, wrote in support (sample I etter on page 27 ) a REFERENCE SITE DESCRIPTION Acreage: 24.9 (20 .5 acres f or the townhouses) Existing land use Undeveloped Natural features: A pond on the northeast corner, slopes and woods SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Lower Afton Road and Battle Creek Regional Fart. West: McKnight Road and neighborhood convenience center with gas pLtmps, multi-famil and single-famil development East: Con emara Condominiums (two 96-unit buildings) South: Townhouses PAST ACTIONS 1971: The Cit granted a special - use permit for a PUD consisting of 375 apartment and townhouse units. This project was not constructed and the special use permit expi red u 5-16-83: The Cit Council initiated a plan amendment from RM, residential medium densit to SC, for the southeast corner of Lower Afton and McKnight Roads at a joint meeting with the Planning Commission. The Council wanted to provide for a variet of commercial services that were convenient to residents of the area. E3-15-83: The Planning Commission recommended denial of the plan ,amendment on the basis that it was not a good commercial decision, no specific development had been proposed, and State law would re a commercial rezoning within nine months of the plan amendment. 10-10-83: The Cit Council approved a plan amendment from FPM to LSC and rezoned the corner to CO on the basis that the CO designation would encourage commercial services convenient to residences and the tax base would be increased. A re b the propert owner to rezone the balance of the site to R-3, multiple dwelling was not approved. There was considerable opposition +rom nearb residents. The Cit rezoned part of the planned commercial site to LBC for a da care center. It was not built* 5 COMF'REHENSIVE PLAN Den Maximum allowed densit 0- 22 people/net acre. Pr'�oseddensit.=16.1pe�le/n����der the �ar��t '�j��finition and '1.5 people/net acre under the townhouse de+inition. There are two criteria for evaluating a project against the City's housing goals--affordability and diversity. Affordability: 1. The housing plan calls for the provision of 620 new housing units to be made available to low-to-moderate income between 1980 and 1990. Low-to-moderate income is defined as affordable for households that earn 80 percent or less of the area median income. In 1988, the area median income for a family of four is $40,700. As of October 31, 1988, 888 new low-to-moderate income housing units had been made available in Maplewood. The excess of 268 units has been applied to the City's modest cost housing goal that is described below. 2. The housing plan also calls for the provision of 785 new housing units to be made available to modest-income households between 1980 and 1990. Modest income is defined as affordable for households t hat earn 110 percent or less of the area median income" As of October 31, 1988, 411 new modest-cost units were made available. These units, together with the 268 excess low- to-moderate income units, leaves 106 additional modest-cost units to be provided by 1990. This project would be cons istent with the City's land use plan and would provide at least 44 units toward the City's modest cost housing goals. Housing Diversity: ti i th The housing goals and objectives n e comp rehensive plan state: 1. "The City should continue to encourage an d p lan for a wide variety of housing types." - 2. "The City should continue to use planning principles for housing areas which encourage planned and developed open space . Is . conveniently located to schools and shops." These goals should be accompanied by a policy of planning for a certain percentage of the City's housing stock to be something other than single dwellings. In 1985 the Metropolitan Council adopted a goal that called for each metro area community to plan for about 41 percent of its housing units to be something other �91 than single dwellings. At the end of 1987, 38.2 percent of Maplewood~s housing units were nonsingle dwellings. If. the City were to be fully developed under its present land use plan, about 44 percent of the City's housing units would be something other than 'single dwellings. The premise for this policy is that the lon'-tezrm stability of the c«zmnmnunity's tax base depends v in large part, upon its ability to attract and retain residents of all ages. To do so, a diversity of housing styles I must be available to accommodate households in each stage of the life cycle of housing needs. In summary, this project is consistent with City housing policies encouraging a diversity of housing types and would provide housing needed to meet the Cit 1990 modest-cost housing goals,, TRAFFIC McKnight Road is classified as a major arterial north of Lower Afton Road and a minor arterial south of that intersection. Current traffic counts on McKnight Road are 8,145 cars/day south of Lower Afton Road and 10,850 cars/day north of Lower Afton Road. The design capacity of the road is over 20,000 cars/day. However, the intersection may need to be upgraded with turn lanes and traffic lights. This intersection is currently controlled with four-way stop signs. Lower Afton Road is classified as a major arterial . Londin Lane is a minor collector. The intersection of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road is a four-way stop. kd/afton.mem Attachments 1. Land Use Plan 2. Property L-ine/Zoning Map 3. Commercial Site Plan 4. Commercial Elevation 5. Residential Site Plans 6. Residential Elevation 7-8. Applicant's Letter 90 Appraiser's Letter 10. Staff Memo on Property Values 11, Resident Letter 12. Mary Anderson Letter 13. Good Value Letter 14. CUP Resolution 7 , a a dW a E • mayor art erial Lower Afton" - � -- .:.: .. •ry : •.; .r is �• ::• :• : :: :�• :::.: :... i i : i •• �•.•:•�••`• R *" " :: :.�: •:. • ••.•• :• .: • • M 11 ctor • •;;::: :;::•: • m! n r c a Londin Lane R o Rh R! •R inor collector - ., Malland ._ I v .1 V m p 11 I � o r � O P os O 7 minor c Hector W V R I DIM 1 c 6- 1 .. o E �c • E i Linwood � & • mayor c Hector � v v i � • � 1 a 1 VISTA HILLS LAND USE PLAN s 4 N RESERVED Ilk.** ' Battle Creek Park 70TA L 18.82 r.. t t FOR (7- -91 030 2 t t 70 _ I ' i C 0 do woopF LOW LAND ... ` -~ El Z4 a - v B 04 0 328 338 . r Gfv Cc 346 AP RTC' _ 350 love 2271 EI -2299 Connemara `fit• Z... 1• •_ McKnight Townhomes ♦ �,o.ez 17 Z•368 1'is•gtG '� ( l E p UT LOT r 3 l ow p 50. ' Zoon i ng Key 4 !L: MCAM&HT •'PwNH .; I _ . CO = Commerc Office c° LBC= Limited Business Commercial • �N - ;; _ �; F = Farm Res i denti al • ;; o R -1= Single Family v y2 1 (C 13 TW AU N Lo Z. i •0 'J9 23 30••IL �� A �' o • Y O P. .4 1 2 �.7 M w PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 9 Attachment 2 N in 0q- 40 40' ( 7 ) c� t�► Gfv Cc 346 AP RTC' _ 350 love 2271 EI -2299 Connemara `fit• Z... 1• •_ McKnight Townhomes ♦ �,o.ez 17 Z•368 1'is•gtG '� ( l E p UT LOT r 3 l ow p 50. ' Zoon i ng Key 4 !L: MCAM&HT •'PwNH .; I _ . CO = Commerc Office c° LBC= Limited Business Commercial • �N - ;; _ �; F = Farm Res i denti al • ;; o R -1= Single Family v y2 1 (C 13 TW AU N Lo Z. i •0 'J9 23 30••IL �� A �' o • Y O P. .4 1 2 �.7 M w PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 9 Attachment 2 N ` ...DAD � « -- L,owEJt AFf'0�'� R M 4 M • i Alfa.. • K•d 1 . 1 • 1 40 OW IUl . ... r ..... r• "'• win .r. r ' � I `. rJ i • ` `� ---- UU� �juj�Ijij,�ijll� 1 • T ""__ • " - � � i + MAIL � '. " M• 1 ._ RUAL i ! - 01/00, o RLPTkE 40 / • ' Wor �J l�'/ �' • } ' ! _....- , it or F ! _ ' ! ! IF / or to IWAV two 40 _ /. RETAIL �•.wf+f. � � 1 l« .� 1 / so"** 0 • `slow `^wool f►�,►.. d' • � • ! NM, ✓lo' t � /tom .v1 • Z ._11�.. 1 "W"o • 1•b t !. ! = 1 1 i • MAPJMP M IT: Se RM E"ATE'SE7 V=S VM PAAHM �612��72•�000 z. logo z. LOWER AFYON Flu$% AP f - POND COMMRCIAL SITE p ' '� , •\ t1 .. • `- M .... a ffi , U COMMUNY CENTER es wow moma somM Woo~ tr .r flre .... • y ` —..�• ow w w ww •. Nww t ! _ `L (R 1 .~irw•.w.�. ••tm.r. 7. C o 4w to do NNW* un � wr+rw •ter r•1 .� — 1 �.J r wt•,.�•.awt.w w�• t� / J m so m a • wart..s.w ,.�., �' (171 a wow-me • � tmr•nw • •M. w e �'/ ob woo *of r w .m.- • "I . w 1 -- • �_ is w tun.• •t ••r jw • 000 .w•trrtw rtaw �it�CK :t " - - - m oo tm•hrmw Mprm i i• W 4— E V Q m ap I eivo o d 7 K7 TOW lose Qw�a Sep MA IN At* I /tme of / t / t 1no Ave true sojul" sooftA*"rs w Wod 0tt•331.3oft �aCMTtCTt Not r sws . ssOUS l t 1 1101 CLOIC 1 ♦vttM 10u#tt yMq arts t1 w soo*$ •tt sta•e3s0 t SITS PLA =-=_� A2 •�• - . _ �..�� - 4141. fit I f ° r �' • r ;4106 _.. 000 xrvri + t • — •— •— -- • r.. - .� 0 ... Sol g SIX KNIT BUILDING - FRONT ELEVATION - s A. `%► ♦ Pr SIX UNIT BUILDING - BACK ELEVATION o►:=V I - ..1.-.1._ �_j —�---- EIGHT UNIT BUILDING - FRONT � ELEVATION - - - - - hW =ICE L S A D ENTRY SCREEN ELEVATION ___ -_•_. -_ •; ^ I I � r r• / ( `) �,.. �.. 0410. \ ��. SIDE ELEVATION AM 4, v i B �ic-' --_" _.. 0,000,_ .._. -- - • -- - - -- - - -__._ ._ � . -- .--- -- -- - -- .�'�. �y,.....•,,. --- -- ---- -- — —�--- --- -- _0000 __ _ _.....,. � _ — _ — _ � = --- — -- —_ 0000._ _000.0 --- EIGHT .UNIT MXDING BACK ELEVATION ' E • �M.ttwMtO rMwasN w tN !M•MNwIMN Iyllt•�Mll I�If$ gigs Wk 1Mt ri"t M/ NO to Mt v01v apt t uvWts Q U at• 11 M0tli0 ~9 tv am tWo W~ b" c @W#Wg dWl.l. w01 rttw t. tti lMtttc011o1 KLtwM9EMM Ma le�� uod 1 In 4m or" !e!. TOWPA"M lu• t r►nrn� 1 Nt 1'•r � rM� i r/f. �07• Qw N IRA /I41111t hM 11 • �� IA0 �� I t 1 I we Aglow SoMat Mrrq MO 044*4 1 )rwrom two rm • r + It" WA amp" " "60010! 49 tce• CLUION 414WA sew" " • �+�.• Im IM t PO4 •welt • ca.ea ,,0000. , �.. W SO do t OM 11 vV400 1W M amd to is 10600wt/w 14 fm" 0 f"110406 O MSK& n"•c01t , ' IS awwted twr•.te t.01.r ad Iw..01 of tAn M40 M is i ..as I "mm«► army ! � It MmOM r1►1* w M cwt! %mo ttp ttM tr �.r1•tt m•�tt+ nnNc «I •t cat ltt•MN nw/ ttltf Wd IMw+• t?Z WOW Nod two"'m • "wet cr10149 WIMSt11 lttNr 0A 10w1M trr>� ct�.1.e t! Nww P4 Was 14 A4MMl *ANMV W&NOOO w.•wt ttwl• r cs 1119" Wd Whltt town to MVU ttlw. 0icgw• N fNwMly /KM t t! Wovy claw" M nM to fee Jac 1 an IttNc 0t1 1! l�f tblYr• Z 1 �art.ttet wwMr • M tOe�.11c.t Mdl - . .. . . 99 4 0.0 00.... �r•wr•I vas Soon of mommomm EXTERIOR ELE V ATIONS 13 8 UNIT- AS BECK ARCHITECTS INC. 1118 Sheridan Ave. N. Minreapolis, Minresofs 55411 (612) 521-3835 5 August 1988 Geof Olsen City of Maplewood Di raatar of Community iavelaprmnt 1830 East County Road 5 Maplewood, Mi nnesote 55109 [dear Mr. Olsen: On behalf of 5 5 M ul ti fa mi 1 y fund I I, I am req uesti ng a change i n the comprehensive plan to permit this proposal PUD. The PUD consists of a commercial /retail development at the southeast corner of Lower Afton Road and McKnight and a residential development on the re mai ni ng p ro pe rt y. T he co m me rci al devel o p me nt is co m pati bl a vi t h t to needs of t he ad j are nt resi de nti al devel o p me nts a nd wo ul d se rve t he retai 1 needs of ho meow ne rs i n t he i m medi ate a rea . T he r i de nti al devel o nom. nt proposed provides a good transition between the higher de nsi t y Co n ne ma ra p ro j ect to t he east a nd t he si ng] a fe mi 1 y ho mes to t he vest. T he p ro posed de nsi t y i s appropriate to the site and adjacent land uses. T he fol 1 owi ng eval uati o n c ri to ri a fo r P U D a re add ressed as fol 1 oars: 1. Comprehensive Plan -an application has been made si multoneousl y to amend the comprehensive plan to permit the PUD. I t is viewed that the intended use is co rn pati bl a wi t h t he sw u r ro u ndi ng 1 a nd uses. T he resi de nti al co m po ne nt of t hi s PUD provides anapproprlate transition from the high density Connemara deyel o p me nt to the east and the low density residential on the west at W K ni g ht Road. T he co m me rci al co m pn ne nt i s 1 orated at t he i me rsecti o n of M K ni 9 ht a nd Love r Afto n Road w hi e h wo ul d co nee nt rate Ye hi c ul a r anti vi t y as fa r as possi bl e from residential uses. 2. P u bl i c Beal t h5afet y a nd Ge ne ral Wel fa re - no det ri me ntal i m pact ca n be perceived. 3. Compatibility with the Zoning District- no conflicts can be perceived. 4. Property 'dal ues - Property val ues will ce rtai nl y not di mi ni s h due to the p ro posed use. I n fact, t he y wi 11 be e n he need d ye to t he basi c i m p rove me nt of t he u ndevel o Red si to . 5. Nuisances- none can be perceived. 6. Ve hi c ul a r T raffi c - t he resi de nti al ode nsi t y i s of mode rate i me nsi t y. T he p ro posed plan calls for two parts of i ng ress and egress. The i m pact will be mi ni mi zed at any o ne i me rsecti o n. 7. Public Utilities -this proposed development will utilize all public services, st reets , pol i ce ,fi re p rotecti o n, uti 1 i ti es,sc hoofs a nd pa r ks . 14 Attachment 7 M 8. Public Welfare of the City - additional requi rements to the use of public swrvices is I mited to the i ncrease of population due to the increased housi nq. This will not create an abnormal increase in demand. 9. Site's Natural and Scenic Features -every attempt is made to preserve trees and natural gradi ngs in the housing portion of the site. The commercial component is devoid of natural features due to the previous gravel excavation on the site. 10. E nvi rn n n* ntal Effects - not u ral o n si to d rei nee wi 11 be p rese rued. No excessive grading i3 proposed. Every attempt is being made to preserve the essential character of the site and all approppriate erosion control measures mill be taken. Thank You for your consideration, Akns Beck, AIA 15 The need for two pump islands has been explained to me as the ability to service the greatest number of cars in the least amount of time. Studies have shown that 60 percent of Gas Convenience stores business is g enerated between the hours of 7:00 AM to 9 :00 AM . and 3 :30 PM to 6:30 PM. 'These five hours are also the most congested on roadways. Therefore, if a gas- convenience store is to attract enough numbers of motorists to its store and service them quickly so there is no waiting it must at a minimum provide 12 spaces to fuel vehicles. To do otherwise would render the site unacceptable given the very large capital expense required to open a new gas convenience store. Each business that has an interest in this location has told me they would not be interested if we could provide them with only one pump island. They felt that doing so would be like tying one arm behind their back. Without a gas convenience store as an anchor, the retail portion will not get off the ground. I am asking that you endorse the two pump island site plan so that the entire development can be a tremendous success. Sincerely, S B REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Inc. Tim Mannie Commercial Agent GASCONY : TEMP /reg 16 Attachment 8 77 1. NORTHWESTERN November 16, 1988 Mr. Tim Mannie P.O. Box 1482 Minneapolis, MN 55440 -1482 REPLY TO: 1240 West 98th Street Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 (612) 887 -6141 Su P erAmerica has a definite interest in the site you represent at Maplewood, Minnesota on McKnight and Lower Afton. You have indicated the City of Maplewood might possibly put some real restraints on the site as far as merchandising the gasoline, by limiting pumping points, etc. Su P erAmerica's marketing strategy is one that is different from most other convenience marketers. We like to sell gasoline and lots of it. Ashland Oil, our parent company, is in the refining business and marketing of gasoline both wholesale and at retail. We g enerally have 38' islands with ten gasoline nozzles on each island. Normally we have two islands,.sometimes three. It is much harder for us to make a profit if we can't generate high gas volumes, two pumps would be a severe hardship. A lot of our customers are quick one -stop. customers. They stop and get gas and come in and shop for a few items. If we only had two pumping points, it would really discourage inside shopping. A lot of the convenience would be lost with smaller.and fewer islands. You would not have the ease or flow on the property that you get with multiple islands. The amount of stacking room for additional.vehicles is cut back drastically with shorter and fewer islands. When customers have to wait, which they would at shorter islands, this would not be good for business. Customers would not continue to shop with us. These are just a.few of the reasons SuperAmerica feels strongly about our concept of multiple islands and many pumping points. Y JDitlevson Real Estate Department Ashland Ashland Petroleum Company DIVISION OF ASHLAND OIL. INC. P. 0. BOX 301 • ASHLANO. KENTUCKY 41101 • (M6) 3'29 -3333 17 REAL ESTATE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT APPRAISALS JOHN J. KENNA REALTOR 212 MIDWEST FEDERAL BLDG. go E: FIFTH STREET ST. PAUL, MINN. 55 101 October 31, 1988 Mr. Geoff Olson Director of Community Development City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 EE!'I'AHUMUM IN 1@308 PHONE: 222 -s"s RE: Development proposal for the southeast corner of Lower Afton and Mcknight Roads. Developer - Sherman & Boosalis Dear Mr. Olson: At your request I have inspected the above stated property for the purpose of evaluating the impact of the proposed development on the surrounding community. This project, as I understand it, includes the construction of a shopping center fronting on both roads at the northwest corner of this land. The remainder of the parcel would be improved with a multiple family residential development. As you 'know this tract is presently open land which is rolling and partially wooded. There is a pond near the northeast corner of the property which has apparently been taken (easement) by the city for drainage purposes. The entire area of this land is 24.87 acres. This property has 500.2 feet of frontage on McKnight from the southeast corner of the intersection with Lower Afton to a point where it abuts a four or five lot plat known as Cardinal Heights at the south. These lots are improved with single family homes that front on McKnight Rd. The frontage on Lower Afton Rd. is 1,276.48 feet, but some of that is low in the area of the pond. The best access to the interior of the property would seem to be from the south at Londin Lane where there is a frontage of 1,066.45 feet. Existing developments in this area include the Connemera Condo- minium complex at the east side of this land. This is an established home owner association that appears to be very well maintained and has a good reputation in the southeast condominium market. A larger townhouse development is south of the property at Londin Lane and Dorland Rd. On the west side of McKnight Rd., in St. Paul, is a smaller shopping center known as Shamrock Plaza and behind this is an apartment ME Attachment 9 REAL ESTATE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT APPRAISALS JOHN J. ANNA REALTOR 212 MIDWEST FEDERAL BLDG. 60 E. FIFTH STREET ST. PAUL, NaNN. 55101 October 31, 1988 Mr. Geoff Olson Director of Community Development Page 2 BWA USHUD IN 1880 PHONE: 222 -6886 complex somewhat south of Lower Afton Rd., the land adjoining the road is being offered for sale. On the. northwest corner of the intersection is a large apartment building known as the Battle Creek Apartments. This property also does not have frontage on Lower Afton Rd. The land fronting on the road is zoned R -1 and is presently not improved. The entire tract on the northeast corner seems to be owned by Ramsey County and is used for Battle Creek Park. The south portion of Maplewood is presently being developed with larger, upper bracket, single family homes as well as some town - homes of more traditional design than those proposed. The area of the proposed development will be the "southwest entrance" to this part of Maplewood. You may wish to consider the type of statement or first impression that the proposed development will make on visitors as well as protential homeowners and developers. Regarding the proposed development, I understand the. residential portion would be one level townhomes, wood frame with a brick base, with attached single garages. These buildings are to be two to three levels high. This design is more generally referred to as apartments with the exception of the garages. A typical townhouse has been a unit consisting of two or more levels of living area with a garage. As a whole this residentaal development would appear to be like in nature to the existing structures in the area. The topography of the land should provide a buffer between this area and the Connemera complex, while the area to the south is used for medium density residential and should not feel any negative impact. The single family homes on McKnight Rd. at the southwest corner of the property may require a buffer (fence) for privacy. Some concerns about the commercial corner are the landscaping, increased traffic, location of the entrance and exit drives, the daily business hours of the stores and the area between this area and the proposed residential community. The appearance of the shopping center will be dictated a great 19 REAL ESTATE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT APPRAISALS JOHN J. KENNA REALTOR 212 MIDWEST FEDERAL BLDG. EO R. FIFTH STREET ST. PAUL, MINN. 55101 October 31, 1988 Mr. Geoff Olson Director of Community Development Page 3 ZffrAeM I N 1800 PHONE: 222 -MWIS deal by the landscaping.of the grounds. All of these centers are basically the same with concrete buildings, pump islands and black top parking lots. Generally_ if one of these centers is better in appearance it is greatly attributable to the grounds. The same is true for the area between the commercial and resid- ential portions of the project. Both McKnight and Lower Afton Roads are well traveled. McKnight intersects with I -94 approximately 1�,- miles north of this corner and Lower Afton meets Highway 61 one mile west. The speed limit on Lower Afton is 50 MPH and and there is a hill which begins about 1/4 to 1/2 mile east of this property and drops steadily to McKnight and continues to Highway 61. In adverse weather this could be a problem for cars entering and exiting the shopping area. The intersection is controlled by a four way stop sign. I feel a traffic engineer should be consulted regarding entrance/ exit lanes, left turn lanes and a traffic light. If they are needed the developers of the shopping center may help with the cost. Another neighborhood concern should be the business hours of the stores in this center. In conclusion, I do not feel that the project will have an adverse impact on the existing improvements in the area but you should satisf y yourself as to the experience and financial abilities of the developer, the ability to maintain the townhouse portion,• that the police and fire protection in the area are sufficient and that the project in general is one that will generate future growth in the desired direction for this part of the city. Please feel free to call with any comments or questions you may have Yours very truly, :: J hn T. Kenn 20 TO: City,Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: The Effect of Multiple Dwel lings on Adjacent Single — Dwelling Home Value's DATE: February 7, 1985 multiple e dwel t i n adjacent to single dwellings is held, Whenever a hearing fora p g neighbors alwa s argue that their property values will depreciate. To question y this bel i.ef i s like arguing against motherhood or appl 'pie. I n order to separate fact .from f rom m y th, I have done some research. The following is a list P of the only studies I ' coul d find in the metro area: 1. The City of Coon Rapids (1978 -81 data) - -city assessor This stud co the sales ratio (assessor 's value /average actual y P . sales � rice ' 'of single e dwel 1 i ngs over the whole city versus single dwellings P adjacent to apartments, double dwellings and home occupations. The result is that there was no significant difference in the value of homes. 2. The City of Brooklyn Center (1982 -83 data) - -city assessor This is a s i mi 1 a'r study to that done in Coon Rapids. This study also found no significant difference in the value of single dwellings adjacent to multiple dwellings versus the average value of single dwellings city— wide, It is i nterestIng to note that parks had a s l i g h t l y negative effect on adjacent home values.. A stud b the Boscl ai r Corporation for the City of Bloomington (1960 - 3. y y sales es data from Bloomington, New Hope, St. Louis . Park and Edina) . This stud y shows that homes adjacent to multiple dwellings had a slightly .higher value y y 4. A stud b Nofth Star Appraisal for the City of Savage (1980 sales data from Apple Valley.and Burnsville) • he effect of This study was based on quad developments on, adjacent single t q d w'l lin s. This stud y also found that there was no adverse effect on the property � e �g . ' values of - ad anent homes. There ,. was also no increase in marketing time. A surve y of adjacent homeowners found a pos i ti ve attitude toward the q uads. Homeowners did not feel the projects reduced their property values . p olluted their vision or increased the number of undesirables in the . neighborhood. 21 Attachment 10 A study by Lafayette and Pierce, Inc.- -real estate apprai for Castle �. Design and Development Co. (19$4) , • ei ht -bui ldi n , 64 -unit apartment development This study is based on a proposed g g i Maplewood called Sterling Glen. This study found that the apartments wou ld not be a deterrent to the overall marketability or value of adjacent homes. Conclusion • se . eni al of a multiple dwelli project on the negati Council should not ba d effect • t on adjacent property values, unless there is something specif about a • dif it from multiple dwellings in general. Available project that di ffe studies do no t show a negative effect on property values or marketin time of adjacent homes. cc: Council Planning commission HRA CDRB Associate planners 22 � °. eR September 26, 1988 Geoff Olson Director. of Community Development City of Maplewood I recently received a letter regarding the development of a tract of land with boundaries of McKnight Rd. So., Lower Afton Road, and Londin Lane. This development is to contain a retail center on the corner of McKnight Rd. So. and Lower Afton Road and 152 rental townhouse units bordering Lower Afton Road and Londin Lane. These factors have generated the following concerns: • Retail center - need for retail center what is the justification) - hours of operation of the retail center (evenings, Saturdays, and Sundays) - additional traffic two entrances on McKnight and two entrances on Lower Afton) - safety - noise - pollution • Rental townhouses - need for additional rental units (what is the justification) - frequent turnover in occupancy - density level - additional traffic entrances on Lower Afton and Londin Lane) - noise - pollution possible trespass of people crossing other properties enroute to the shopping center - grounds upkeep, snow removal, etc. • Possibility of new streets adjacent to existing properties • Possibility of assessments to existing properties because of streets, sidewalks, etc. • Devaluation of existing properties because of additional traffic, rental properties, and loss of open enviromental space I had a market evaluation done by Ken Erickson of Coldwell Banker Realty because I believe the proposed development of rental housing and a retail center will limit buyers and depreciate the value of my property. Encl a summary of his evaluation. Doris Petersen 346 McKnight Rd. So. Maplewood, MN 55119 23 Attachment 11 1 v MARKET PRICE RANGE BUYERS 40 VERY FE MANY BUYERS • PRICE • LOCATION + •CONDITION „�. • FINANCING LIST PRICE r development 85000 1 95000 :i /11 ' /111 75000 � 85000 24 CBM 1181 (4187 Summary: Presently 346 S. McKnight Rd.'s main feature is the rear view which is undeveloped. The hone is structually sound, clean and shows well. .Obvious ly since McKnight Rd is a moderately busy and noisy street is a current con - cern. By developing the rear areas with a shopping center and /or multiple housing would adversely affect the marketability of 346 S. McKnight Rd. The subject property would depreciate approximately $10,000 or more. 25 f f f f f • • • • f mary nderson BETTER HOMES FOR BETTER LIVING MARVIN H. ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 8901 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55420 September 23, 1988 Mr. Geoff Olson City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MITT 55109 Dear Geoff, TELEPHONE 681 -2661 WOW 35th Anniversary 1987 I recently found out that a large rental townhouse development is being proposed for the McKnight - Lower Afton Road area. As a resident and developer in than area, I think I have a good feel for the problems of that area. Homeowners in that area are already concerned about all the rental property on both sides of McKnight south of Lower Afton Road. Rental property tends to bring a rougher element into a neighborhood. Most parents in Crestview will not let there kids go into the area or down to the stores at that intersection because of the rough kids that they have there. We, as a developer, have had materials stolen from us traced back to those residents. I feel it would be a real mistake to allow more housing like that into the area. As you know, the City, School Boards, and Developers are trying to work toge ther to promote the south leg of Maplewood as the place people will want to build their new $200,000 plus Domes. We are having a hard time competing with Woodbury, which is only 2 miles away. Don't allow another negative to go into Maplewood, We are the highest taxed city in the area and need the city's help to sell homes in south Maplewood, not to add another problem. I would ask that you contact the developers in South Maplewood to get their comments, Please pass my feelings on this important issue to the staff and council. Sincerely, G Grt Vice President GG: jh t fY T �p�'Y 1 S r 1So et- / / } 26 Attachment 12 22'88 October 26, 1988 Mr. Geoff Olson Director of Community Development 1830 East County Road B Vaplewood, 1 55109 RE: Proposed Mix -Use Development at McKnight Road, Lower Afton Dear Mr, Olson: I have reviewed the proposed Sherman Boosalis Development for the intersection of McKnight Road and Lower Afton. It is my opinion that this development would be a very positive influence on the South Maplewood Community. We would like to go on as to supporting this development. Sincerely, GOOD VALUE ESQ INC. Jo R. Peterson V' e President of Development 27 Attachment 13 GOOD VALUE HOMES, INC. • Registered Builder • 1460 93rd Lane N.E., Blaine, MN 55434 -4396 • Phone: (612) 780 -5510 PLtrsuant to due 'cal I and notice thereof a regular meeting of the Cit Council of the Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota was dul called and held in the council chambers in said cit on the da of 1988 at 7 p.m* The following members were present: The +ol I owing members were absent WHEREAS, SL's Multifamil Fund 11 Limited Partnership initiated a conditional use permit for a PUD consisting of a 33,600-square-+oot retail center and 152 multi-famil housing units at the following- described property: Subject to old Lower Afton Road and McKnight Road and except south 450 feet of west 250 feet part of N W 1/4 of N W 1/4 south of new Lower Afton Road in Section 12, Township 28, Range 220 This propert is also known as 2299 Lon d i n Lane, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural histor of this conditional use permit is as +01 1 ows: in This Conditional use permit was reviewed b the Maplewood Planning Commission on November 21, 1988. The planning Commission recommended to the cit council that said permit be 2a The Maplewood Cit Council -held a public hearing on December 12 1988. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the cit staff and planning commission" NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL THAT the above-described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings -of -fact: I a The use is in conformity with the cit ' s comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2a The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public heal th safet or general wel+ are s 3a The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district* 4a The use would not depreciate propert values* 28 Attachment 14 5. The use wou1d not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use woul d generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congest ion Wmsaf/e access or parking needs that will cause'undue burden to the area properties 7~ The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. ' 98 The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would Cause minimal adverse environmental e+Fectss Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The development shall adhere to the plans and conditions approved by the Community Design Review Board, except that the density must comply with the City's comprehensive plan. Future changes to the plans must be approved by the Board. 2. All commercial uses shall conform with the BC(M) (business commercial [modified]) zoning district requirements. Restaurants and a fuel station with no more than two gas dispensers on one island shall also be allowed, provided that the City's parking requirements are met. On-sale li shall not be allowed. 3. External speakers and lighting shall be directed away from dwelling units and the sound shall not exceed fifty decibels (normal conversation level), and light shall be shielded and not exceed five foot-candles at the property lines. 4. There shall be no exterior storage or sale of goods or merchandise. 5. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approved or the permit shall become null and void. A six-month time extension may be requested as allowed in Section 36-442(d) of City code, 6. There shall be no vents for the underground fuel tanks within 200 feet of a resi-dential property line or the buildable area of the planned residential developments 7. The type and anchoring of underground storage tanks shall be approved by the City Fire Marshal~ The tanks shall be strapped to a concrete slab. 29 Adopted this da of 198 Seconded b A OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY SSW CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I the un.dersigned being the dul y q ual if ied and appointed c erk of the Cit of Maplewood, Minnesotaq do hereb certify that I have carefully I compared the attached and forego i ng extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maple held on the da of . 198 , with the original on f i I e in m off ice, and the same is a f ul I true and comp ete transcript insof ar as the same relates to a conditional use permits Witness m hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the . city this da of 198 Cit Cl erk Cit of Maplewood 30 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING C OMMISSION 1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B9 MAPLEWOOD9 MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 21 , 1988 I. CALL TO ORDER Chas rmah . -Axdahl called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Commissioner ester AxIdahl Pre en t C ommissioner ichael A Pr sent Commissioner R*Chard Barrett R P went Commissioner Ro ert Cardinal 'resent Commissioner Fr k Dempsey 'Present C ommissioner Sue Fiola Absent C ommissioner Lorr ine Fischer Present Commissioner Albe t Goins Absent Commissioner Denni Larson 'Present Commissioner Marvin Si Present Commissioner Ralph 7 eaten Absent APPROVAL OF MINUTES, A, November 7 1986 Commissioner Fischer b d the Planning Commission approve the minUteS of November 7 I I Commissioner Sigma k. sec nded A —Ax%dahl Barrett Cardinal riempsey F i sche4« 1 Larson, Si Abstent i ons--A I V APPROVAL OF A N111A Commissioner Fischer moved the Pla ning commission =k r iprove the i a as s bm teed e F A n er Fischer b m n C1 co mmissio r Barrett seconded A ---Axdahl A . Barr t t, Cardinal Dempsey, Fischer, Larson Si ve PUBLIC HEARINGS. A, Lower Afton Rd. and McKnight Rd. (Maplewood TownhOUSeS and Retail Center) Plan Amendment PUD Traffic Study Secretary Olson presented the staff reports Planning Co mmission minutes 11-21 -88 N i ck Boosal i s of Sherman-Boosal i s s the real estate developers for the proposed project, said onl two gas dispensers would limit the amount ' of traffic through the center and would mai-.-.e it difficult to get tenants into the centers and once ins to draw enough business into the center for the tenants to remain Allan Anderson, a partner o+ the Shamrock- Plaza Shopping Center, said when there is an heav rain, there is a odin drainage/+ 1 og problem in the area. Mr. Anderson asked whether an environmental im pact studies have been done and whether the City of S t. Paul had been contacted regarding this project. Ken Haider, Director of Public Word, s said minor drainage improvements had been done in the area and the drainage impact would be considered with the Community Design Review Board's review of the project. Robert B and ini, 2485 Londin Lane, ask.ed whether stop I ights had been proposed for the intersection of M&*%'night. and Lower A+ ton Roads. Staff said that Ramse COUnty's. traff ic engineer had been contacted and - indicated that there was more than enough ca to handle the increased traff ics but that the would probably need a stud to see whether installing a traffic light wOL1.1d be jUSti+ ied. rioug Al set h, 2358 Londin Lane, said he w as opposed to the project, that it was unnecessaryl and that it woLtld create vacancies for the shopping center already in the areas Jerr Johnson, 2445 Land in Lane, ast-.:ed that the problems..; with the drainage in the area behind Conemarl-%a5 which Causes flooding of the Conemara driveway, be corrected bef ore this project is built. Mr. Johnson a lso commented on the traffic problems in the area* Se . veral other people spoke opposing the project, objecting to the tra++ic problems, problems with rental propertY, I overcrowding of schools, problems with pol I ution and drainage /flooding problems and other objections. Comm i ssioner Fischer moved the Planning C ommission recommend denial of the plan amendment from LSC to SC on the basis that this is a neighborhood commercial center is to limit g as sales in these and the City's Policy locations to two dispensers on one islands C ommissioner A seconded A 9 A Barrettq Cardinal Dempsey Fischer, L arson s Sigmundik Planning Co mmission Minutes 11-21-88 C ommissioner Fischer'moved the Planning Co recommend approval of the resol'ution approving a conditional use permit for a PUD on the basis that the ten findings for a conditional use permit would be met* Approval is subject to the followi . ng conditions: an The development shall adhere to the plans and -conditions approved b the Communit Design. Review Board. Future changes to the plans must be approved b the Boards be All commercial uses shall conform with the BC(M) (business commercial [modified]) zoning district re Restaurants and a fuel station with no more than two gas dispensers on one island shall also be allowed, provided that the Ci t y - Is park-ing re are met. On-sale li shall not be allowed* ce E . ,ternal speakers and li shall be directed awa % fro m dwel I ing units and the sound shal 1 not excee d 50 decibel s (normal conversation I evel and 1 i shat 1 be shiel ded and not exceed f ive -f oot sand es at the propert lines* d There shat 1 be no exterior storage or sal e I of g oods or merchandises e The proposed construction Must be substantial ' l started within one y ear of Council approval of the Pe rmit shall become null and voids A six month time extension ma be re a s allowed in Section 36- 442(d) o f Cit codes fe There shall be no vents for the Underground fuel tanks within 200 feet of an e%x. -isting residence or the buildable area of the planned residential developments The t and anchoring of underground storage tanks shall be approved b the Cit Fire Marshal . The tahkos shall be strapped to a concrete slab. Commissioner Barrett seconded A Barrett Cardinal Fischer, Larson Sic .;mund i k Na dahl Dempsey Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning C ommission recommend authorizing staff to re a traffic study Planning commission Minutes 114-21-88 .from Ramse Count to determine if improvements will be needed at the McKnight and Lower Afton Roads intersection prior to this. project's constructions Commissioner A seconded A dahl A Barrett, Cardinal I Dempse F i scher L arson o ; Si Co mmissioner Larson moved the Planning Commission- recommend an environmental assessment worksheet be donee C ommissioner Cardinal seconded A A Barrettq Cardinal Dempsey, Fischer, Larson.; Sigmundik Be Gery is Avenue (Maplewood Multi+ami. Housing) an Amendment is ' an P r presented the aff report. Secr\etar Olson pres Linda Fisch'r, representing I BY Partnership, gave a presentation Also present was Ken Eel gard, Harr Yaft'e,. representativ s of BBY Par nership; Scott England and James Cooperma , represen i ng the architect for the project; Gene E nst, rep esenting the landscape a rchitect ; Dick Schabert, r presen ing the surveyors and civil engineers; Chuck y kira-, representing the tra++ic engineers; and Ron Pe arson who prepared the environmental asses n worksheets A commissioner ask the developer had considered underground parkc in Fischer said that the architect's exper ence s that garages would meet all needs of the res 'dents . Donald Larson, 554 Bitters eet La said he didn't believe 3M pe onnel would renting units in this complex,, as t e already have su+f icient units rented at locations wh*ch are closer to he 3M offices . Bill Burns 2527 Bittersweet Lan read a signed petition from surr nding propert owners ho are objectinc to this r _ Iat project 1 s deEvelopmentl asking that this proposed developm nt not be approveds Joe Za/vaij 2522 Flandrau, said this proposed development ' Community Design Review Board ' Minutes 11-29-88 . ' C ^ Site Plan - Maplewood Town Homes and Retail Center Lower Afton Road and McKnight Road ' No representative wa.s present for the applicant, S. Multifamily Fund 11 Limited Partnership. . . Board Member Deans moved approval of the site plans date- , stamped August 24 1988 for S. B. Multifamily Fund 11 Limited Partnership's retail and townhouse PUD, subject � to the following conditions: Retail Center ' 1. Approval of a conditional use permit for a planned unit development by the City Council. The number of fuel ` pump dispensers is subject to City Council approval, based upon the Land Use Plan designation, 2^ All parking requirements shall be met for this facility to permit restaurants in the retail center. ' 3. Detailed signage, landscaping, grading/drainage and architectAral plans must be submitt�*d for Review Board approval . 4. Approval of plans by the Community Design Review Board does not constitute approval of a building permit. 5. All trash dumpsters shall be stored in screening enclosures with a 100% opaque wooden gate and shall be a color and material compatible with the building. Enclosures i3hall be protected by concrete-filled steel posts, or the equivalent, anchored in the ground at the front corners of the structure. If the ehclosure is masonry, the protective posts may be omitted. 6. An erosion control plan, acceptable to the City Engineer, shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit for erosion control during construction. |. Parking areas shall be striped and all bituminoUs i areas shall have continuous concrete' Curbing. Parking lots shall be k in a continual state of repair* If construction has not begun within 18 months of approval '» Board review shall be repc°ated. 98 Site .security lighting shall be provided and shall be 'directed or shielded so not to cause any undue glare . onto adjacent properties or roadways. Community Design Review Board -9- ' Minutes 11_29-88 ' � 10. If any adjacent-property is disturbed or property irons removed due to construction of the site, that property shall be restored and irons replaced by the applicant" ' ` 11. Final grading, drainage and utility plans, shall be subject to the City engineer's approval . 12. Reflectorized stop signs and handicap parking signs shall be provided, 13. All public boulevard that is disturbed due to this construction shall be restored and resoddeds 14. Five-foot-wide bituminous sidewalks shall be provided from the rear pinrking lot to the proposed townhouse development to the east and southeast. These bituminou�� sidewalks shall be installed when the adjacent townhouse complex has reached 70% occupancy to determine where pedestrian traffic would Occur. The applicant shall provide a cash surety in the amount of 150% of the cost of sidewalk completion prior to obtaining a building p ennit ^ Designated pedestrian crossing areas shall be provided in the parking area by cross-hatching and signing. 15. Five-fdot-wide, concrete sidewalks shall be provided along McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road on public right- of-way adjacent to the proposed site. At `all points of driveway crossing, the sidewalk must blend into the driveway grade. 16. An in-ground lawn sprinkling system shall be installed, 1.7. Building addresses shall be provided, subject to the Fire Marshal's approval. I.S. Fire, hydrants shall be provided if required by the ' Fire Marshals ' t l�� . The applicant shall provide �� monetary guaran ee , in aform acce �zibletostaff,intheamcunt of150%ofthe estimated c ost o+ any site improvements that are not Completed by occupancy; 1° Approval of a co�ditional use permit for a planned unit development by the City Council. [ "ommunitY Design Review Board -10- Minutes 11-29-88' 2~ 120 cubic +e*et of miscellaneous storage space in ' addition to normal closet space, shall be provided fc:)r each unit. 3. At least half of all parking stalls must be 10 feet feet wide; the remaining half may be no l ess than 9 ee wide Handicap spaces shall be provided as required. 4~ Detailed signag*�, landscaping, grad ng/drainage and architectural plans must be submitted for Review Board approval. 5. ' p ' . Approval of plans b the Community Design Review Board des not constitute approval of a building permit. 6. Al 'Outdoor trash dumpsters shall be stored in screening enclosures with a 100% opaque wooden gate and c;hall be a color and material compatible with the building. Enclosures shall be protected by concrete- filled steel posts, or the equivalent, anchored in the ground at the front corners of the structure. If the enclosure is masonry, the protective posts may be omitted. 7 . An erosion control plan, acceptable to the City Engineer, shal1 be submltted prior to the, issuance of a building permit for erosion control during construction. 8. Parking areas shall be striped and all bituminous areas shall have continuous concrete curbing. Parking lots shall be kept in a continual state of repair. 9. If construction has not begun within 18 months of approwalv Board review shall be repeated. 10. Site security lighting shall be provided and shall ' be directed or shielded so not to cause any undue glare onto adjacent properties or roadways~ 11. If any adjacent property is disturbed or property irons removed due to construction of,. the site, that property shall be restored and irons replaced by the applicants ' 12. Final grading, drainage and Litility.p]ans shall be subjsct.to the City Engineer's approvals ' . 13" 'Reflectorized stop signs and handicap parking signs shall be provid^ed. Community Design Review Board 711- M instes 11-29-BB . . . . 14. All public boulevard that is disturbed due to this construction shall be restored and resodded. 15. Five-foot-wide bituminous sidewalks to the retail center, as well as an internal bituminous trail network, shall be provided at 70% occupancy of the complex. This is to determine where pedestrian traffic would occur in lawn areas. The applicant shall provide a cash surety in the amount of 150% of the cost of trail completion, prior to' obt�kining s building permit. ' 16. The Londin Lane driveway shall line up with Dorland Road. 17. Five-foot-wide concrete sidewalks shall be provided along Londin Lane and Lower Afton Road on public right- of-way adjacent to the proposed sites At all points of driveway crossing, the sidewalk must blend into the driveway grade. 18. An in-ground lawn sprinkling system shall be installed. 19. Building addresses shall be provided, subject to the Fire Marshal's approval. 20. School bus pullover areas a bus shelters shall be provided, subject to staff approvals 21. Fire hydrants shall be provided if required by the Fire Marshal. 22. The applicant shall provide s monetary guarantee, in a form acceptable to staff, in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of any site improvements that are not completed by occupancy. Efoard Member Anitzberger seconded Ayes---all |%%" VISITOR P.RESENTATIONS . viii. BOARD PRESENTATIONS U" STAFF PRESENTATIONS ' x^ ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 8:53 p.nm. MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNERS: PROJECT: DATE: Act 10on by Counc Oil -. Endorsed_______ Modif I'ed_______ ' Rejected_______ Date— City Manager ` Director of Community Development Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Gervais Avenue BBY Partnership Estate of H. Stanley Wessin Maplewood Housing November 30 1988 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION ELga e s. t The applicant is requesting approval of a comprehensive plan amendment from LSC, limited service` commercial to RH, residential high density and a conditional us*m permit for a planned unit development. Reason for the RecUeSt The developer would like to build an apartment project. The site is zoned LBC, limited business commercial. This district is limited to office and day care centers. Rather than apply for arezoning, the developer is applying for a PUD. Multi-family PUD's may be approved in any zoning district by conditional use permit (CUP). A CUP for a PUD is only for a specific use and site plan, wherea ' a rezoning to R-3 multiple dwelling would allow a variety of multiple uses and plans. One of the findings for a CUP is that "the use is in conformity . with the City's comprehensive plan.." This site is designated for LSC use. A plan amendment is, therefore, needed to meet the first finding for a CUP^ De�scription o+ the Proi-ect The PUD consists of 426 apartment units- one-bedroom units, 233 two-bedroom units and 119 three-bedroom units. There would be twelve three—story buildings, 25 garages, one-story recreation building, cabana and day care center. A variety of active and passive recreational facilities, trails and open spaces would be provided. An on-site private trail system will connect with future trails to Harvest Park to the west and Mapleridge Mall to the east" The proposal will not infringe on wetland basins located in the northeast quadrant of the site, except for an elevated boardwalk along the margin of the wetland" An additional excavated ponding area will be provided on the site. BACKGROUND This site was planned i l �d for high density residential use from at least .1969 unti 1 - he + ollowing is a brief history af .prev ' prop osals for this site and City actions: DATE REQUEST LeCon Properties requested preliminary approval for mixed PUD, including 350 multi-family housing units. Concept Approval +or Wood- mark, Inc. to construct apartments for elderly housing. (This project was later dropped.) ` City initiated rezoning of site from LBC to R-3 to bring zoning ordinance into compliance with the compre hensive plan. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL ACTION Planning Commission approved. Project was dropped before the City Council considered it. City Council approved the concept. Planning Commission recommended approval , but City Council denied it. There was strong neighborhood opposition. Council then amended the pl to LSC a There are no specific criteria for a plan amendment decision, Any change in the land use plan should be consistent with the goals, policies and objectives in the City's comprehensive plan. Section 36-442 (b) of City Code requires that approva l o f a conditional use permit shall be based upon ten findings. (Refer to the findings in the resolution on page 69.) DISCUSSION This project presents a difficult decision because of the strong neighborhood opposition" Staff feels that this project would be at least as good as an office development and would be better in terms of traffic generation" The project is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan policies, the historical designation of this site for high density residential, and the findings in the City Code for a conditional use permit" The site is well � is located on a major collector street, suited for apartments--it d l� close to a ma arterial, church, park and shopping, an would be buffered fo adjacent homes by landscaping and typography" ` "' The proposed rents, recreational l facilities tenant amenities and y i interior design indicate that this projec t is aimed at middle- 2 , income singles and families. Recommendation 1 Approve the resolution on page 67, which amends the lend ° 'use plan � from L8C to RH ^ Approval is based on the following +indingsx a This site is well-suited for apartment use and is c with the City's policies for the location of high density residential : (1) This site would be a transitional land use between low density residential and commercial /industrial uses. (2) It would be compatible with City policy to preserve the site's significant natural features" (3) It is located adjacent to a collector street, church and shopping, and is within walking distance-of� Four Seasons Park. b ^ The City's Housing and Redevelopment Authority has found this project consistent t i tent with the City's housing g types. The diversity of housing policies that encourage a proposal also addresses some of the concerns that have been expressed in the HRA's recent annual reports. For example, this project would: (1) replace the three-bedroom rental units that were lost when the McKnight Townhouse development f years ago (2) converted to owner-occupied units few yea , a replace some of the planned RH, Residential High Density acreage that has been designated for other uses in recent years ' (3) provide at least 74 of the 106 additional housing ities needed to comply with the City's 1980 to 1990 modest-cost t h in��g goal and (4) provide some upper-income family rental units. c. This project would have no adverse effect on surrounding properties: (1) The apartments would be screened and buffered from the single homes to the northwest by steep slopes, and existing and proposed vegetation. (2) Studies show that there will be no adverse effect on property . values attributable to this project. (3) There would be no traffic from this project through residential streets. d A 400,000 square-foot office development, which is a under the existing zoning and land use plan for the s would generate two to three times more traffic during the P,Mn peak hour and about 65 percent more average daily traffic than the proposed multi-family housing development. !his would create congestion with the turning lanes at White ` Bear Avenue and Gervais Avenue. e. This site was designated for RH use from 1973-198391 The Planning Commission recommended approval of a 350-unit apartment project e t i 1��'7 and the City Council gave concept approval to an elderly housing project in 19838 2. Approve the resolution on page 69 which approves a conditional use permit for one year for this project. Approval is on the basis that this project would meet the ten findings for a conditional use permit, (Refer to the resolution for speciFic Approval is SUbject to the +ollowing conditions: a. Adherence to the site plan and conditions approved by the community design review board. Future changes to the site plan may be approved by the board. b. All uses shall conform with the R-3 zoning district requirements. c. Noise leve1s shall not exceed PCA standards at any residential property line. d. No outdoor storage of recreational vehicles, boats or trailers. 4 CITIZEN COMMENTS Neighborhood surve were mailed to the 30 owners of properties within 350 feet of the proposed development.. Of the 22 returned four were in favor of the re (these included Mapleridge Mall, the propert owner and nearb church) , 17 were in opposition and one had no comments Those in favor made the +o1lowing comments: in Prefer housing instead of businesss 2n Seems to be a wel I thought out proposal and an appropriate land use for the sites A summary . of comments of those in opposition are as follows: There is a glut Of apartment rental units; no need of massing housing herew 2a Too man resident and t too man buildings for such a small area 3s Problems w . ith overcrowded schools, traffic congestion on Gervais and White Bear Avenue and surrounding streets. 4s Increase in crime, noise at all hours of the night with people coming and going constantly* 5s The .1 arge scope of the development is absurd. The neighborhood clearl expressed its wishes and opinions in 1983. 6s People financing apartment complex ma not be the owners in f I ive y ears i what guarantees do we have? 7. LSC provides a tax base without an of the accompan R ressures put on social services. Businessmen are good neighbors, we cannot guarantee the same for apartment dwellerso so Proximity o f proposed walking/jogging trails to Bittersweet would promote additional auto traffic on Bittersweet b nonresidents of neighborhood using trailss 90 Rents could become subsidized and 1 ower-income +amil ies move in and depreciate our house values and increase the number of children in the comp lexo 10. Lighting g lare from the project will effect uso l ie It will take three y ears to construct the project and do landscaping. It - is too long a time to be inconvenienced b bulldozers and noise* 12. Steel siding and asphalt shingles, exterior should be brick and cedar shingles to g o with the natural areas 0 0 13 . Traf f i c counts --. 900 park i ng spaces ava i 1 ab l e but generat i ng 153 p.m. peals trips? 14. Would 1 ike to set singl a -f ami 1 y housing. light industrial office building or 200 --unit housing developments Several sample letters of opposition are attached on pages 60 through 668, REFERENCE SITE DESCRIPTION The subject property has 31 acres with approx imatel y 1 1 300 f eet of I frontage along Gervais Avenue and an average depth of about I.,000 feet The subject property is undeveloped and contains four wetland basins, two of which are significant in size, one of the basins is a protected wet and and is I ocated in the extreme north-central portion of the site. The other large wet and basin is a Cit stormwater pond and is found in the east- central q uadrant of the site. Steep slopes exist in the northwest and northeast corners of the site* VEGETATION Trees and brush are found in the northwest corner of the site and extend into the adjacent propert Mature trees consisting of 6-8 inch oaks, 12-inch ash, 12-inch maples, and cottonwoods are found on the northwest to north-central q uadrant of the site. There are also small nodes of insignificant trees scattered throughout the site. A variet of "scrub" trees such as boxelders and poplars are found in the north-central portion of the site and some ver large cottonwoods are found along the southwest propert lines SURROUNDING LAND USE Immediately to the east of the subject property is Map leridge Mall which is anchored b a Rainbow Foods Store. To the north is Ramse Count open space, which consists primaril of protected wetlands. There is a single-family residential neighborhood to the northwest and immediately to the west of the site is an undeveloped parcel of land which is zoned residential Adjacent I . ands on the southwest corner of the site contain single-family residences. Further west lies a single-family residential neighborhood and Four Seasons Parke Land south of the propert across Gervais Avenue is primaril commercial and .industrial s PAST ACTIONS This site was rezoned from SCI shopping center to LBC in 1969. The LBC zone at that time allowed ap art mentso In 1973, the City adopted its first comprehensive plan and designated this site for FAH, high densit residential uses In August 1977, a re was made b Le Con Properties for approval of a mixed PUD including 350 multi-famil housing units. The Planning Commission approved the preliminary concept plan but the project was never considered b the City Council le In September 1982, the Cit Council gave concept approval to Woodmark, Ince to construct apartments for elderl housing* (This project was later dropped.) Since 1982 no other, spec i+ic proposal for multi -- family housing on the site hav e been 1 considered b the Planning Commission or Cit Counc i In April 1983 the City initiated a rezoning of the site from LBC to R-3 to bring the zoning ordinance into compliance with the comprehensive plan. The Planning Commission recommended ,approval of the R-3 zoningg but when R-3 zoning of the site was considered -b . y the C it y Council q neighbors expressed concern regarding the possible extension of their streets thro the site bringing multi -- family housing traffic through their neighborhood. The were also disturbed that subsidized housing on the site could be In ilit since there were no specific development plans a possib s. I the Cit Council denied the. response to res ide nts' concern 0 1 -a comprehensive plan amendment from RH to rezoning and approved LSCS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Den Allowed density Proje ct densit 34.0 people/net 33.8 people/net providing 1% of trees) acre acre (assumes a bonus for the construction cost in Land Use Policies The proposed project is in c I ompliance with the comprehensive plan's housing balance and mix policies for the +ollowing reasons: The comprehensive plan states: "The City shat I encourage transitional I and use with medium and higher density residential development located between low-density residential and commercial or service land uses s" The proposed site serves as a transition between the commercial /business warehouse land use to the east and sou th , and the low-density residential areas to the north and wests 2,w In Section 74-2. "The City shall utilize the +oilowing policies: "Ensure resi dent ial.development which is compatible with features of the natural environmentq and accommodate development without destroying of environmental +eatures, and natural amenities a The proposed project preserves natural features such as wetlands and tree preservation to the north an . d northwesto 3a In Section 74-51 comprehensive plan polic shoulds 0 a ,, Ac complish transition between distinctly different t of residential I and uses in an orderly fashion to avoid creating a negative (econom i cl social or ph impact on adjoining developmentso" * 0 nimized between single-family residences to Conflicts are mi the north and west and proposed multi-family housing to the south because of changes in site topography, preservation of natural vegetation and the proponent's o wn proposal for additional berm ing, screening and buf+eringm 4a In Section 74-12, "High-density residential areas should be located adjacent to or in close proximity to collectors and arter i al s . " The site is located in close proximity to major thoroughfares (White Bear Avenue and Highwa 36) and Gervais, Avenue is designated a major collector in the Comprehensive PI an . 5a The project is also in compliance with residential development design objectives in the comprehensive plan. "Pedestrian wa should be planned and developed to connect homes with schools and open spaces" The proposed site plan provides trail linkage with Four Seasons Park to the west and Mapleridge Mall to the east" Housin G oal s There are two criteria for evaluating a project a the Cit housing goal s--a++ordability and diversitys Affordability: 1 a The housing p an cal I s for the provision of 620 new housing units to be made available to l ow-to-moderate income households between 1980 and 1990. Low-to-moderate income is defined as affordable for households that earn 80 percent or less of the area median income. In 1988, the area median income for a family of + . our is $40 9 700 . As of October 31 9 1 98e 9 888 new I ow- to-moderate income housing units had been made e available in Maplewood. The excess of 268 unit s has been app ied to the C it y 's modest cost housing goal that is described belown 2s The housing plan -also calls for the provision of 785 new housing units to be made available to modest-income households between 1980 and 19900' Modest income is defined as affordable for households that earn 110 percent or less of the area median income . As of October 31, 19889 411 new modest-cost units were made available. These units, together with the 268 excess low- t ��� income units, leaves 106 additional modest-t��st units ~ to be provided y id d b 1990 . This project would provide at least 74 modest-cost units. Housing Diversity: The Housing goals and objectives in the comprehensive plan state: ^, "The City should continue to encourage and plan for a wide variety of housing types." The Proposed project provides a mix of 1-, 2- and 3-bedroom units as well as a variety of types of units. 20 "The City should continue to use planning principles for which encourage planned and developed open space... conveniently located to schools land housing areas c , Af ter completion of the proposed development approximately 60 ^ it ill consist of open space landscaped areas or recreational site will ' , It is well served b y the adjacent Mapleri and is two miles from Maplewood Mall. These goals should be accompanied by a policy of planning for a - i k certain percentage of the City's housing stock be something o rop/litan� Council other than single dwellings. In 1985, the t adopted a goal that called for each metro area community to plan for about 41 percent of its housing units to be something other than single dwellings. At the end of 1987, 38.2 percent of M lewqod's housing units were nonsingle dwellings. If the City wapo to be fully developed under its present land use plan, °='= a"""` 44 percent of the City's housing units would be something Th other than single dwellings. e pre mises for this policy is that the long-term stability of the community's tax base depends, in large part, upon its ability to attract and retain residents of all ages. To do so, a diversity of housing styles must be available to accommodate households in each stage of the life cycle of housing needs. The HR/ ^ met on November 15 and came to the following conclusion: ' The Ge 'ais Avenue housing project is consistent with the City = housin policies that encourage a diversity of housing types. The proposal also l l addresses some of the concerns that have been n he HRA's recent annual reports. For example, this e:pre«�s�u z ld � (1) replace the three-bedroom rental units that project would: were lost when the McKnight Townhouse development converted to owner-occupie�d units a few years ago, (2) replace some of the has been t planned RH, residential high density acreage that , � signated for other uses in recent years, (3) provide at least "~~ additional housing opportunities needed to comply 74 19 housing goal and (4) with ''� City's -- family rental its provide some upper-income fam y ren a units. (Hazel Ridge contains some upper income un but Hazel Ridge is restricted to 10 colder adult residents`) Par L,in . There are e 975 parking spaces provided in garages an d surface parking lots= 852 spaces are required by ordinance" 426 spaces are located in parking garages and 549 spaces located in surface There ,parking areas. Th would be 123 more surface parking spaces than code requires. Traffic and Access Access for the development will occur at three locations from - Gervais Avenue. Gervais Avenue is a major collector in the comprehensive plan. According to the proponent, the proposed 426-unit development will generate 153 trips in the p.m. peak hour and 1 average daily trips. A trip generation rate of 4.1 (ITE Manual) was applied. Staff believes the trip generation rate will be closer to 6.1 (ITE Manual)~ Statistically, this is a more accurate measure of probable trip generation rates for ~'- accurate -- probable apartments in a suburban area. Nevertheless, figures for the d development are significantly less than the 620 p.m. pr�pCzse e»e d 3 880 average daily trips which would be generated by an of peak hour trips and development at maximum allowable density o n the subject site. While some project traffic will pass through the residential neighborhood to the west, the bulk of traffic will use White Bear Avenue--a, due to the configuration of the Hazelwood Avenue and Highway 36 intersection. It appears that there will be no ti t the corner of Gervais and significant increase in congestion a White Bear Avenues. The proponent's traffic study indicates that the intersection will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service after one year of full development of the project. mb/bbypart.mem 11 Land Use Plan 2. Zoning/Property Line Map 3~ Site Plan 4-8. Section Views ' 9. Typical Elevation 10. Applicant's Letter 11. Applicant's memo on property values ' effect o 1��, Memo: ff t f Multiple Dwellings on Adjacent Single- dwelling Home Values 13-15. opposition letters 16. Plan Amendment Resolution 17. CUP Resolution 18. EAW (separate attachment) 19. Plans (separate attachment) 11 Int Vadnals Heights ..._._ ME _ C V • • �- W major collectory 4-- � r � b / to - �e i ..,, .� S C oi r jar BW Y6 t ,�1 --ter • �• �/ O C AC •e+ V • 0 C .. - o • u %V 0 w E 4 C w • m • �a �1por • • �St . M • L a i•_ Ds to %r p S V 1 RL. •�� 1 Q• r s = HAZELWOOD 1 LAND USE PLAN attachment 1 12 Interchange Ta � o u n r say Hass" coltecto� 4 N C V • • �- W O r C C AC •e+ V • 0 C .. - o • u %V 0 w E 4 C w • m • �a �1por • • �St . M • L a i•_ Ds to %r p S V 1 RL. •�� 1 Q• r s = HAZELWOOD 1 LAND USE PLAN attachment 1 12 Interchange Ta � o u n r say Hass" coltecto� 4 N . • t t • . --- f.l�Y•'9 • -e • = +. "•2'•x••4. 4444 _ - - �•- s� --rs. we ?C ; .' ; _ = .• =� t l aw ; 4W : • r '_•• v• r •;i l ► f i.•. N� .• ��A {•Il�� 1 as so Aoin •• N � �i:L•I 1 �, �� ��� • �� / ~ ••' • �� V • 4 l.t... st = �'� 4 394• W �/� ,!+'. ( +•! = too— ' ! • ~ / 1 . ! + , 1 �. �� p .... ` ..1 4494- •• op A 2 • • ` 1•• • • 3 tt • �.� • 1 • tr• ,rTs1 ITS i 1 O • psi • (ni . 40040 w r - • .^ 1 'aa ,U 4• r W i •(.•) . • 4444. .,, j .«+ pV 1 1 A► _� hl.r Q `H • . K 111 • t1 • •• .�. : (if) at..: •,• - a.a 4•r• .•AI' �".`,M `•• BC '.� -r. • '. ems p`I La► • • U • r• i g .4. �.'"� ..:. /• _ F crok • 0 US No a in fee, _ r► star ; M � » • ��, rri /li /r a _• Joe re or AS at wadi" •.. / p • • : 1111 - f • .off :.. t �. • R1 ��- f. • • 10 f•+' v+ (A1 tai « • ~ '� ." . e,, C • �{ ( F V 1 : to r . • t 1 ,.1 p Zc� � � r VV v Rite Z. CM SPACE E IF n r a lff • 1 • ' , Y is • I..w1 • ; �'•• •• = : 1 :: f• -- n• --7r �' /J ..,, 1f N • R td N • t 71 D/ j .. � • •• � � � • �/ • 1 • 191 • • f J•J � — • w.. Iw ,i ,CD � • ( ...at... ) 4r R1 -lose 42 a all ISBN not IN 2122AN11luff I •ar,. }. 9444 v i! II /r / ftfts re Sr At LBC 1 , 1 j • r ♦ L/I+�• a • 'trier rrfftif►Ir • 1 �t u• `� YT� • 4- `J - • S T . , r • O_ � � r rJl1J1 r//rrr /� /r / 410 D Al It 6040 p 5 10 • L BC w •• M • � ; ` M « •+ . 9449 • . C. rr /rrr Wde r /rl / 4 ELEVENTH • • fi'•9 a i i' �{ f offer lr/ erg r 1 /(ur o•o ;. as • & E A10 • F 1 4444.. . tie j ♦ I j r i ,. �.... «� rl'1 + � IM) la• Otf yl leaf wl CPO �' • u • All pr: o AVE- r ! . •,,,, 4444. . t: ,; is A s a s • • 4 s . - J p? . ' . SECT'f�K E� • 0 w " • . y.. �� 4 f 1 Ad fLf 3 tul GPI tsN Z • (� ♦r.> w !w �- tR `� - •L B C • . • MAPt, 00 � n - SING /� .. r • Y. G . ... • - ! • � rrir�fir//�r / //r /t/�rt/r t rir/rrrrrr / reefer /rr/rrrirrrrr�r� /// / /� • • r /t //r•rrr - 1 �rr r//t��r i 0_ _! 1 r rinrr>rrt� r s W12211tuJ1 U- "— .. Ot3R •• •- -�--�- - -- - - ' - 4444 •� �♦ �•i R I - VIVINITY M •• -• i l'•. ii•.... � • s _ Z7�b • •►• �. '; .�.• �. i 4�SS.i ... I r r w. �.. ±. �.�• • 1 •.•ice - .. •.ii• /!. ��•I��.� r'r ♦.1 •.• .. . •'.i�..� • Section Views through AA, BB, Zoning Key CC, DD and EE are shown on R -1 = Single Family Attachments 4 -8 F = Farm Residential LBC = Limited Business Commercial BC = Business Commercial PROPERTY LINE" / ZONING MAP 13 Attachment 2 4 N Em per m-mai Mm ., �— wd P . Is. AX%%.6 1%-d� — —W - V Poll iN 40 x� VL ri l 7 ISW all. ro dr—I 10 , VW Its QO =a I I WO A i Q 7m, w l4w r to lb, aft fi rip W a do' A p . wAb.– do: ^-7 PV T - ol CAP v li'qb 14 N -4ti -AP14" e -45 k ar l �–".'A 1.71 1— I 7 A VON ISW F R • f I i �I Ir mAPLEMOD HOUSING l C+ h 0 (D r C+ r.� ,•A O1 C? C S M �. • _ MAPLEWOOD HOUSING.- ......a • v «.e.v 1 G. M � • C s (D C+ } 's MAPLEWOOD HOUSING !� 1 �� v c+ C+ sECnON o-o pi MAPLEWOOD HOUSING =4 a" Cw vmwLav%mxk m 004... Dan~ w A..nl� ...r.�... M C+ v i ' r _ PROPOW DATUM _ y .• �� •, , • , op ssnMS 1 • 1 1 1 • ;7 0 ' 000- ~ � ' ww • �ia w t • OtRTMA IItf�O1C! 117" QNWAM • - oft no N 8 QARAOt - 1M. SECI MAPLEWOOD H OUSING C" OF UUMMrOM rN11EljOTA v!s/p C+ C+ Qu (D :3 C+ 'r L-0-1 r1l".) C) C-) M r— M C) 2m Mon.. SUSS WA *qxTvAUAL-* T^ ALA. 400VAP dW AP A MY "goir 6LSM4% 6. &6"0 A OL • A*►&&A-T 04OW4L&* p w orb4#44do MOVIL "WLPMIOOQD menkL oomd* AWL cma ' wftj. nwomM ID ID m n" w Z. L4u- m lu ED ID ED 1111 ID Ca& *PW AWD 4ML 41 Iblo UNIT bL11t- Cr4ft W& aus"ATO" I so LWI-F WL-0044 crow 40^6&1 Iftloo. W JAMES P. LARKIN LA�xiN HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. DAVID J. PEAT FRANCIS E. GIBERSON ROBERT L. HOFFMAN 1 , MICHAEL T. McKIM JACK F. OAtY CHARLES R. WEAVER D. KENNETH LINDGREN ATTORNEYS AT LAW HERMAN L. TALLE ANDREW W DANIELSON WILLIAM S. BRANDY WENDELL R. ANDERSON VINCENT G. ELLA GERALD H. FRIEDELL TRACY R. EtCHHORN-HICKS ROBERT B. WHtTLOCK ALLAN E. MULLIGAN 1500 NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CENTER 2000 PIPER JAFFRAY TOWER ANDREW J MITCHELL 0* ROBERT J. HENNESSEY JAMES C . ERICKSON 7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH 222 SOUTH NINTH STREET JOHN A. COTTER BEATRICE A. ROTHWEILER EDWARD J. DRISCOLL JAMES P. MILEY BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 PAUL B. PLUNK ETT AMY NARK aRADY ALAN L. GENE N. FULLER DAVID C. SELLERGREN TELEPHONE (612) 835 TELEPHONE (612) 338 KILOOW TTE P NEWMAN KATHLEEN M. ERINE BARN ETT WILSON* RICHARD J. KEENAN JEFFREY C AND ERSON JOHN D. FULLMER TELECOPIER (612) 835 - 5102 TELECOPIER (612) 338 - 1002 ES ES DANIEL L. BOWL E. BOYLE TODD M. VLATKOVICH FRANK 1. HARVEY TIMOTHY J. M CMANUS RICHARD A. FORSCHLER JILL 1. FRIEDERS ERE CHARLES S. MODELL NORTH SUBURBAN OFFICE GREGORY E . KORSTAD CHRISTOPHER J. DIETZEN CRAIG A. PET ERSON JOHN R. BEATTIE 8990 SPRINGBROOK DRIVE SUITE 2SO LISA A. GRAY LINDA H. FISHER GARY A. RENNEKE THOMAS P. STOLTMAN COON RAPIDS, MINNESOTA 55433 THOMAS H. WEAVER STEVEN G. LEVIN FORREST D. NOWLIN TELEPHONE (612) 786 - 7117 SHANNON K. MCCAMBRIDGE MICHAEL S. COHEN MICHAEL C JACKMAN JOHN E. DIEHL (612) 786 -6711 DENISE M. NORTON GARY A. VAN C LEVE JON S. SWIERZEWSKI T ELECOPIER MICHAEL B. BRAMAN RAMA THOMAS J. FLYNN JOSEPH W. DICKER JAMES P. OUINN JACQUELINE F. OIETZ TODD 1. FREEMAN GAYLEN L. KNACK STEPHEN B. SOLOMON RODNEY O. IVES PETER K. BECK P JULIE A. WRASE JEROME H. KAHNKE S HERRILL OMAN KURETICH Reply to Bloomington RONA D M. STARK, iJRRtSTHAL GERALD L. SECK SHARON L. BRENNA JOHN B. LUNDOUIST MARiKAY CANAGA LITZAU DAYLE NOLAN THOMAS B. HUMPHREY, JR. OF COUNSEL JOSEPH GITIS JOHN A. MCHUGH October 3, Q Q Q 1988 8 8 RICHARD A. NORDBYE *ALSO ADMITTED IN WISCONSIN Mr. Geoffrey Olson Director of Community Development City of Maplewood .18,30 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 RE: BBY Partnership Written Narrative in Connection with Application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Planned Development Conditional P Use Permit and Community Design Review R v i Board Approval for Multifamily Housing Development, Maplewood, Minnesota Our File No. 15,845 -00 Dear Geoff: This letter- memorandum constitutes the written narrative required by . City f Maplewood (the City) ordinances to be submitted in connection • P � a comprehensive with BBY Partnership's application for plan amendment, p P P lanned unit development (PUD) conditional use permit, and Community Design Review Board approval (the Application) for a multifamily housing development ve 1 o me nt ( the Development) on a 31 -acre site ( the Site) generally located west of the intersection of Gerva is Avenue and White Bear Avenue. Charles Belgarde, Kenneth Belgarde, Bryant Belgarde, and Christopher Johnson, the principals of BBY Partnership, have substantial experience in multifamily housing development extending over 0 During that time period, they -have developed over 4,000 e r years. g units of multifamily housing in the Twin Cities metropolitan area, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Over 1 of those apartment homes have been developed in the 1980s, including the Cliffs at Ridgedale (456 units; built in 1985) in Minnetonka, Minnesota, and Spring Brook P A artments at Northtown ( 358 units;. built in 1987) in Fridley, Minnesota. The P ri ncipals of BBY Partnership were also involved in the initial development of two areas of multifamily homes in Plymouth, 21 Attachment 10 Lj . � + N.: ul{ C.` �. 45i +)wSYSN...L.Llf:.Y�S�N......... _..:... .:..:..•:.�..:.�•. .. L..� LARK IN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGKEN, LTD. Mr. Geoffrey Olson October 3, 1988 Page 2 Mi nnesota Four Seasons Villa (240 units; built in 1968) and Fox Meadows (312 units; built in 1970). The following consultants have been retained by the developer, BBY Partnership, to provide assistance with the Application: Architects James M. Cooperman & Associates Architects, Inc. 9800 Shelard Parkway Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 (612) 545 -0409 Consulting Surveyors and Civil Eng ineers Harry So Johnson Companies, Inc. Suite 199, Southtown Office Park 8100 Penn Avenue South Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 (612) 884 -5341 Lands cape Architects Ernst Associates 122 West Sixth Street Chaska, Minnesota 55318 (612) 448 -4094 Traffic En i neers and Environmental C onsultants Barton Aschman Associates, Inc. 111 Third Avenue South .Suite 350 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 332 -0421 Attorneys Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. 1500 Northwestern Financial Center 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 (612) 835 -3800 The information contained in this narrative report, together with the lans submitted in support of the Application has been , development p prepared by taking into consideration t he following 22 LARK IN, HOFFMAN, DALY SAC LINDGREN, LTD. Mr. Geoffrey Olson October 3, 1988 Page 3 1. Existing characteristics .of the Site and surrounding area, including soils, topography, and vegetation. 2. Existing proposed and ro osed land uses i n the vicinity of the Site. 3. Existing zoning of the Site and history of previous multifamily housing developments proposed for the Site. 4 Relationship - to the City. of Maplewood Comprehensive Plan, including statement in support of request for amendment of Comprehensive Plan designation of Site from Limited Service Commercial (LSC) to High - Density Residential (Rh). 5. The effect of the Development on the visual environment of the area, including provision of a visually appealing building design and provision of a suitable buffer between the Site and the adjacent residential neighborhoods* 6. Vehicular access, circulation, and parking and the effect of the Development on the regional and local roadway system. 7. Provision of a variety of active and passive recreational facilities, trails, open space, and distinctive landscaping. 8. Protection of on -site wetlands and provision of drainage and erosion control consistent with City and Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District standards. 9. Utilities. 10. Compliance with findings for approval of PUD conditional use permit. APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN THE SITE AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT BBY Partnership has contracted to purchase the Site which is proposed for the Development. Consistent with its past practice, BBY Partnership intends to maintain long -term ownership of the Site and the Development* EXISTING CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SITE The Site on which the Development is proposed to be located consists of approximately 31 acres generally situated north of Gervais Avenue, west of White Bear Avenue, and south of Demont Avenue. A boundary, 23 LAKKIN, HOFFMAN, DAEY & LINDGREN, LTD. .Mr. Geoffrey Olson October 3, 1988 Page 4 location, and topographic survey, and existing conditions plan submitted with the Application depict the existing topographic features of the Site, including approximate size and species of on _ site mature trees* Areas of steep slopes exist in the northwest and northeast corners of the Site, which serve to demarcate the property from the residential and open space areas to the northwest and northeast, respectively. A sizable node of understory trees and brush, which is found in the northwest corner of the Site, extends onto the adjoining property. A second area of mature trees and brush is found in the northwest to north - central quadrant of the Site opposite Fla ndrau Street and Bittersweet Lane. As shown on the existing conditions plan submitted with the Application, this wooded area includes 6 -inch to 18 -inch oaks, as well as 12 -inch ash, 12 -inch maple and cottonwoods. It extends to the north onto adjoining residential properties. Two protected wetland basins are located in the extreme north - central and east- central quadrants of the Site. Soil surveys indicate that the 'majority of the Site is underlain by urban land - Chetek complex soils with 3 to 15 percent slopes. This soil type is representative of areas partially or completely modified by excavation, filling or development, and is suitable for multifamily housing. The remainder of the Site is underlain by Chetek sandy loam with 12 to 25 percent slopes, ponded aquolls /histosols, and udorthents (heterogeneous, earthy fill) overlying wet substrata* Development will take place almost entirely on urban land- Chetek complex soils and udorthents. Ponded aquolls and histosols, which are poorly drained mineral and organic soils, are associated with on -site wetlands and have been largely avoided in designing the project. A small area of steep Chetek sandy loam, which lies in the northwest corner of the Site, will be partially graded to provide for parking garages and pedestrian trail facilities. As described in greater detail in the environmental assessment worksheet (EAW) submitted with the Application, special measures will be taken to protect this area from erosion and sedimentation. Groundwater investigations conducted at the Site by Braun Engineering & Testing indicate that groundwater levels underlying the Site range from 902 to 907 feet in elevation. The depth to groundwater varies with site topography and ranges from zero to about 41 feet* The average depth to groundwater beneath the portions of the Site to be developed is about 10.2 feet. High soil moisture content and water levels observed in some bore holes indicate that small areas of perched groundwater may exist on the Site. Such areas result from the presence of impervious, clayey soils beneath overlying sandier soils. This condition is very common in areas with variable soils. It is not expected to affect construction. 24 LAK.K IN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGIREN, LTD. Mr. Geoffrey Olson October 3, 1988 Page 5 The ro osed multifamily homes are not expected to have a significant p p p impact upon groundwater resources. No excavation below 907 feet will P be necessary for construction of the homes or garages. Excavation below 907 will occur only where the ponding area is to be constructed and p for r lacement of utility lines and storm sewer. These activities • Y will not impact groundwater quality and quantity. Floor elevations of the apartment homes have been set at sufficient height above the groundwater table to allow for seasonal water table fluctuations* EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USES IN THE VICINITY OF THE SITE The Site is bordered on the northeast by Ramsey County open space which consists primarily of protected wetlands, and on the northwest, by a single-family residential ne ighborhood . Immediately to the east is the Mapleridge Mall, which is anchored by a Rainbow Foods store Immediately. to the west of the Site is an undeveloped parcel of land which is zoned residential; further to the west lies a single - family residential neighborhood and Maplewood Park. Gerva is Avenue-forms the south ro erty boundary.' Land use south of Gervais Avenue is primarily p P commercial and industrial. EXISTING ZONING OF THE SITE AND HISTORY OF PREVIOUS MULTIFAMILY HOUSING PROPOSED FOR THE SITE The Site is zoned Limited Business Commercial (LBC) . Off ices, medical or health related clinics, and day care centers are permitted uses in the LBC district. Planned unit developments, which include apartment projects involving more than one building, are conditional uses in the ' � LBC district. The applicant is applying for a PUD conditional use permit to allow for construction of the proposed Development. The PUD conditional. use permit provides significant advantages to the City and the neighborhood. It requires development in conformance with an approved PUD plan* Pursuant to S ection 36 -443 of the Maplewood Zoning p Ordinance ( the Zoning Ordinance) , any change involving structural alteration, enlargement, intensification of use, or similar change not specifically permitted by the PUD conditional use permit approved by the City, requires an amended permit after public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council. This means that if the proposed Development is approved and for some unforeseen reason does not p roceed , another multifamily housing development could not be constructed on the Site without following the same notification and hearing procedures that were required for the proposed Development on the Site. 25 LARK IN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGRE:N, LTD. Mr. Geof f rey Olson October 3, 1988 Page 6 Until 1983, the City's long -range land use planning for the area contemplated high - density residential use for the Site. In August 1977, the Planning Commission recommended approval of LeCon Properties' preliminary concept plan for a mixed use PUD on the Site, including 350 multifamily housing units. In so doing, the Planning Commission found that hi h- densit residential use was suitable for the Site. This PUD g y project was, however, never acted on by the City Counc il. In September 1982, the City Council directed staff to execute letters of understanding with Woodmark regarding development of senior. citizen ap artments on art of the Site* This project was later moved to a site a P • multifamily housing on Parkway Drive. No other specific proposals for u y g on the Site have been considered by the Planning Commission or the City Council since 19820 RELATIONSHIP TO CITY OF MAPLEWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, INCLUDING STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF AMENDMENT COMPREHENSIVE- PLAN DESIGNATION OF SITE FROM LIMITED SERVICE COMMERCIAL (LSC) TO HIGH- DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (Rh) As described in the preceding section of this letter - memorandum, the City of. Maplewood Comprehensive Plan .( the Comprehensive Plan) , has historically designated the Site for high- density residential uses. In 1983, the City Council initiated a rezoning of the Site from LBC to R -3 as part of a city -wide effort to bring the Zoning Ordinance into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed R -3 zoning was also consistent with previous multifamily proposals made by the former property owner which had been approved by the Planning Commission. The P ro P y � he rezoning Planning Commission recommended approval of t g of the R -3 Site of ter finding that R -3 zoning was consistent with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance; would not substantially injure or detract from neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood; would serve the best interest and convenience of the community and the public welfare; and would have no adverse effect on public services and facilities, such as water, sewer, police and fire protection, and schools. When the R -3 rezoning of the Site was considered by the City Council, neighbors expressed concerns that multifamily housing would necessitate the extension of Flandrau Street and Bittersweet Lane to the south. Concern was also expressed regarding the possibility of subsidized housin g on the Site in the absence of a specific development proposal* Because the rezoning was initiated by the City Council rather than by a developer, there was no site plan or architectural drawings to respond to. neighbors'. concerns. 26 ��' ....�ct..._w_.... ... .. ._ ,. y. ... ... _. 5..�.n4....�. .v.l�rr SSA. . �. �V. yi' Yr.._.l.:. w+ k�4:.r..Xi�L�3S1.�c.vlKfa.:Y:sw �ou.W..- ...r. <.........�. ..__r.... _.... .�. ... • _.._.._.. ...... ..... ._ �... .. LA IRKIN, HOFFMAN, D ALY & LINDGI3EN, LTD. Mr. Geof f rey Olson October 3, 1988 Page 7, In res o nse ' to neighborhood opposition, the City Council requested P of the Comprehensive s taff to initiate an amendment Plan to change the .land use designation of the Site from High- Density Residential (Rh) to Limited Service Commercial (LSC). Although the Planning Department staff PP report opposed this Comprehensive Plan amendment, it was adopted P by Y the City Council in June 1983. The originally proposed R -3 rezoning was also defeated. As a result of these actions, the current Comprehensive Plan designation of the Site is Limited Service Commercial ( LSC) . The applicant, BBY Partnership, has applied to the City for an amendment of app. � the Site to its original land use the Comprehensive Plan to return designation, High- Density Residential (Rh)* The factual and legal bases for this request are as follows 1. - Hi hdensit residential use is consistent with the City's historic High-density Y land use P la nni ng for the Site. The appropriateness of the Site b for multifamily homes was reaffirmed y both the Planning Department and the Planning Commission in 1983. A review of the 1983 record indicates that no expert testimony or studies were offered in support of the Council's decision to reguide the Site to Lim ited Service Commercial (LSC).. Neighborhood opposition to the City-initiated rezoning was apparently the primary, if not the sole basis for departure from the City's long - standing land use assumptions for development of the Site. 2. Changed circumstances justify City Council reconsideration of the 1983 Limited Service Commercial (LSC) designation. First, an experienced multifamily housing developer, BBY Partnership has contracted to purchase the Site* The developer has expended considerable time and effort t0 prepare development plans responsive to City, neighborhood, and state agency concerns regarding i n ultimate development of the Site. A neighborhood meeting g g has been held to obtain comments from nearby residents on the ro os a 1. Second, the developer i s not proposing to rezone the P P Site to R -3. Rather, it is requesting approval of a PUD conditional use permit which will assure the City and the neighborhood that the Development, if approved, will occur in conformance with approved plans and any conditions attached to approval. The Site is well - suited for multifamily housing* Such housing will 3 ' serve as a transition between the more intensive commercial and industrial uses to the east and south, respectively, and the low-density residential uses to the north and west. Soil and groundwater investigations of the Site indicate that the surf icial and underlying i n soils are suitable for the type of construction 27 LARK IN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. Mr. Geoffrey Olson October 3 1988 Page -8 proposed for the Site. The Site is located in proximity to major thoroughfares hfares and transit facilities. The Site is situated a proximately 1 one -half mile north of the interchange of Trunk PP Y Highway 36 and White Bear Avenue and about two to three miles south of the interchange of Interstate 694 and White Bear Avenue . Transit service exists along White Bear Avenue and Trunk wa 36. The closest bus stop to the Site is at the Mapleridge Highway Mall. The Site is also well- served by shopping facilities the adjacent Mapleridge Mall, which is anchored by the including rocer Rainbow Foods store. Maplewood Mall, a regional shopping Y nter, is located approximately two miles to the north in the ce southwest quadrant of I nterstates 694 and White Bear Avenue. m' 1 housing on the Site is consistent with housing policies 4. Multifamily y g in the Comprehensive Plan. For example, the housing plan element o f the Comprehensive Plan states that the City encourages a variety P of housing types and styles and remains flexible and open to development to nt which are in accordance with this objective. q The City intends to continue to use planning principles for housing areas which encourage a greater choice of housing types; preservation ion of natural features, such as ponds, trees, and wetlands; P lanned and developed open space; safe pedestrian ways and streets; conveniently located shops; and . surf ace water control with grading h minimal radi n and site preparation. The housing plan also states that the City encourages transitional land uses, with medium and high-density residential development located between low-density residential and commercial or service land uses. Medium Y um or h i h -de ns i t residential development should be located or i n close roximity to collectors and arterials, such as adjacent P Bear Avenue and Trunk Highway 36 . Multifamily housing should White e occur in areas not inferior to those generally used for conventional single - family housing. The character of existing residential neighborhoods should be maintained and conflicts minimized by the use of physical barriers, distances, screens, and proper physical orientation of lots and buildings. These housing policies, among others, are promoted by the development plans for g the Site as described in greater detail throughout this letter - memorandum . is 59 There a public need for additional multifamily housing in the City. As stated in the 1983 staff report, land planned for multifamily housing i n the y y • City has decreased as compared to the assu p originally on inall set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and probably will continue to remain P Y n co ns to nt or decrease further in the coming years. . I n its review of the 1983 regui d i ng of the Site from Rh to LSC the Metropolitan Council expressed concerns about the effect of regui.d i. ability 1 i t ng of the Site on the Y of the City to M LARK IN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDOR EN, LTD. Mr. Geoffrey Olson October 3, 1988 Page 9 achieve the affordable housing goals and objectives set forth in its Comprehensive Plan. Land . designated for High - Density Residential use (Rh) is less than 196 percent of the total acreage of the City ( 189 acres of 11,529 acres)* Moreover, two sites guided Rh have been developed for single - family housing: a site on Stillwater Avenue between Stillwater Road and Minnehaha Avenue and a site south of Minnehaha and west of Century Avenue. Two sites guided Rm, which is intended for single- family homes on small lots, two-family homes, townhomes, and mobile homes have also developed for single-family use . These sites are located on the east and • datz Avenue and at the g R west sides of White Bear Avenue at a northeast corner of County Road B and English Street. Market studies performed by the Developer confirm the need for additional multifamily housing, particularly for families.. Silver Ridge, an apartment project situated 3.5 miles southeast of the Site on Stillwater Avenue, is the most comparable area development in ter m s of amenities , design, n, and unit size. Despite its recent completion, it is completely rented -up, and there is a waiting list for some types of units. The developer's market studies also identify a public need for three - bedroom apartment homes. Only 95 three- bedroom units are available in the City and surrounding communities and many of these units are not comparable to the proposed Development in design, unit size or amenities. Moreover, P a telephone survey of these proects indicates that only five of these units are not currently occupied. 6. As described throughout this letter - memorandum, the proposed Development will not have a significant effect on surrounding land uses* There will be no road connection between the Development and the residential area to the north. Consistent with Comprehensive Plan g uidel i nes , a combination of distance, steep slopes, preserved mature trees, and new coniferous and deciduous plantings will physically separate the adjoining residential area from the P Development and minimize views of the Development. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1. Pro osed Uses for the Develo me nt on t he S i to . As shown on the site plan submitted as part of the Application, the Development consists of 426 high - quality, high- amenity apartment homes. All of the apartment homes will be three stories. The three -story will be constructed predominantly of high- quality, earth -tone buildings h horizontal lap steel siding materials. Asphalt shingles and P refinished metal bands to match the windows will be utilized as accent W LARK IN, HOFFMAN, DAILY & LINDGR EN, LTD. Mr. Geof f rey Olson October 3, 1988 Page 10 design features. Visual interest will be enhanced by gabled roofs, and p rotruding canopies Over each balcony deck. Garage and surface parking a will be provided. Continuing maintenance . o f the p artme nt homes and landscaping will be assured by an on -site resident manager. The apartment homes are designed for single managerial, technical, and professional ional employees , as well as families. A unit mix of approximately 55 percent two- bedroom units, 28 percent three- bedroom units, and 17 percent one - bedroom units is currently proposed. Laundry rooms will be provided on each floor and the residents will enjoy the use of a party room and a social room. Individual units will be equipped with walk -in closets, architecturally designed closet storage systems, and special kitchen and bath features, such as microwave ovens y and ice-makers. Each apartment home will have an indented entry and corridors will be decorated with special paint treatment. Other distinctive interior amenities include European style kitchen cabinets, Casablanca -type dining room fans, ceiling fans in master bedrooms, vaulted c e i l i n g s , and balconies. All three - bedroom apartment homes and most two- bedroom homes will have a bath and 3/4 bath; the balance of the two- bedroom homes will have a bath and 1/2 bath. Air conditioning w ill be provided throughout the Development by wall units. Energy-conserving eatures have also been incorporated in exterior wall gY g construction. See Exhibit A attached for a list o f interior and exterior amenities. The P roposed Development on the Site is slightly less than the maximum density allowed on the Site assuming application of the current density conversion table and the landscaping credit. The landscaping credit is claimed because more than one percent of the construction cost, exclusive of land cost, will be allocated to the planting of trees. Therefore, no density variance is required. See attached Exhibit B for a tabulation of allowable number of units for -the proposed Development .on the Site* 2. Effect of Pro osed Development on the Visual Environment, Includin Provision of Visually Appealing puilding and Provis ion of a Suitable Buffer Between the Site and the Adj acent Residential Areas to the North and West The visual environment has been carefully considered in formulation of development P plans for the apartment homes on the Site* Outside storage will be prohibited. Higher c e i l i n g s are being incorporated in the design of certain parking garages to allow for exterior storage of motor homes and other recreational vehicles, thereby assuring a more pleasing visual image throughout the Site. 30 LARK IN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGKEN, LTD. Mr. Geof f rey Olson October 3, 1988 Page 11 In response to staff comments, the site plan has been modified to break up the massing of Buildings 1 and 2 and the recreation building which are located aloe the Gervais Avenue south frontage. Visual interest g is created by the difference in number of stories and roof height between these southerly apartment homes and the middle recreation building. The apartment homes are three stories and have a hip roof, whereas the recreation building, which separates the southerly two apartment homes, is one -story and has a low roof. Building 1 has been rotated to distinguish its appearance from Gervais Avenue as compared to the recreation building and the connections between the recreation building and Buildings 1 and 2 have been indented. The overall effect of these design changes is to make the southerly structure appear as three separate buildings from westbound Gervais Avenue at a vantage point near Rainbow Foods. Berming and landscaping along the Gervais Avenue frontage also help to create an appealing visual image See attached colored perspective from Gervais Avenue for an illustration of the effect of this design change. Similar techniques have been utilized to break up the visual massing of the westerly - facing Buildings 8 and 9 and the cabana building which separates these apartment homes. As shown on the artist's renderings submitted with the Application, projecting balconies and other design features create a play of ins and outs, thereby enhancing visual interest of the apartment homes. Color changes in the siding and /or the trim boards will also enhance the overall visual appearance of the homes. In response to staff comments, consideration has also been given to breaking up the massing of the garages es on the west and south sides of the Site. Five parking garages with 14 stalls each are currently proposed, as opposed to a previous site plan which showed 6 parking garages with 12 stalls each. The reduction of stalls has occurred primarily in the northwest corner of the Site immediately south of the adjacent residential neighborhood, where an area originally proposed for parking garages is now proposed to contain preserved existing trees and new plantings. The setback from the p arki ng garages to the northwest property line is now 155 feet, as compared to the 80 foot dimension shown on a previously site plan. As shown on the grading and landscaping plan submitted with the Application, three -foot high berms and six -foot high Colorado spruce and Austrian pine plantings are. proposed along the Gervais Road frontage to screen the parking garages from view. A variety of flowerin g trees, deciduous shrubs and annual flowers, together with a sculpture at the site entry, are proposed to create an attractive gateway to the interior homes* Provision of a suitable buffer between the proposed Development and the northerly and westerly adjacent residential areas was a primary objective of site planning. To address these concerns, existing major 31 LARK IN, HOFFMAN, DAEY & LINDGREN, LTD. Mr. Geoffrey Olson October 3, 1988 Page 12 trees on the northerly perimeter of the Site were surveyed and mapped. - Sin le f ami 1 homes in close proximity to the Site with the clearest Single-family view of the property were identified for further study. Additional studies were conducted to identify areas of the Site to be preserved and to identify areas in which new berms and plantings would be effective in maximizing screening 4o Based on that information, the consulting surveyor and engineer, architect and landscape architect prepared development plans to visually se arate , to the maximum extent feasible, the physically and y p proposed Development from the neighboring residential areas. Several layers of buffer protection are proposed to achieve optimum screening* The first layer of buffer protection is that portion of the existing slop e and existing tall mature trees (approximately 40 feet tall) on the Site and adjoining properties which will not be disturbed by the proposed p ro osed Develo ment. The second layer of buffer protection consists of a landscape berm and /or planting buffer which will be installed on the Site to supplement existing preserved vegetation. Coniferous trees ranging n 9 i n height from 10 feet to 12 feet at planting are proposed to g p year-round ear -round greenery . These trees are expected to achieve about 5 -feet of additional height for each five years of growth. The next layer* la y of buffer protection consists of shade trees and flowering trees which are proposed to create an overall pleasing visual image. The last layer of buffer protection consists of boulder retaining walls, large deciduous shrubs and small deciduous shrubs in the northwest corner of the Site directly opposite garages 14 and 15, and coniferous trees shade trees, and flowering trees directly north of Building 6 which are intended to further screen views from the northerly adjacent residential area. Five cross - sections have been prepared from the following locations to illustrate the visual effect of these layers of buffer protection: Section A -A, from 2522 Flandrau, looking southeast toward Building 7; Section B -B, from 2527 Bittersweet, looking due south toward Building 7; Section C -C , from 2527 Bittersweet, looking southeast toward Building 6; Section D -D, from 2526 Bittersweet, looking south toward ara a 11; and Section E -E, from 1733 Gervais, looking due east 9 g toward the day care facility and garage 1. These visual studies demonstrate that during the summer months, a combination of distance, g slopes, existing preserved trees, new berms, and new coniferous plantings, will screen the garages and apartment homes from the view of t the closest residences. During the winter months, most views will remain screened b coniferous plantings, although portions of the homes • will be glimpsed through the vegetation* After completion of the proposed Development, approximately 60 percent landscaped areas, or of the Site will consist of open space, p 32 LAIRK IN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGR EN, LTD. Mr. Geof f rey Olson October 3, 1988 Page 13 • amenities. approximately 7.15 acres or 23 . This includes approx recreational amenit percent of the Site which will be undisturbed by the proposed Development* , 3. Ve hicular Access Circulation and Park a nd Effect of the Proposed ed Develo ment on the Regional and Local Roadway stem. he Site wi 11 have access to Gerva is Avenue The _proposed Development on t at three locations. No access is proposed to Demont Avenue, Flandrau Street, or Bittersweet Lane to the north. A traffic study of the Development was conducted by Barton- Aschma n Associates, Inc* , as part of the environmental assessment worksheet Development. This study included trip generation and {EAW) for the with examination • analyses, together with a more trip distribution Y ► g vais Avenue and r of the capacity, operation, and function of the G e p White Bear Avenue intersection to the i east of the Site* A summary of the study's findings i g s and conclusions s included n this letter - memorandum* ment will generate 153 trips in the p.m. The proposed 426 -unit Develop g peak hour and 1,785 daily trips. This compares to 620 p.m. pe ak hour • • 0 daily 1 trips which would be generated by a permitted trips and 3,88 Y P office ice density development on the Site at maximum allowable y (400,000 ) square feet). office use, therefore, represents percent increase • a 300 percent in p.m. peak hour trips and p a 100 i n dally trips , as compared to the proposed osed multifamily housing Development. Approximately 80 • s inbound trips in the p.m. peak hour will percent of the Development' a Pp roach the Site from the east, with the remaining 20 percent approachi n g p erce from the west on Gervais Avenue. P.-M. peak hour exiting traffic is expected to distribute 60 percent to the east and 40 percent detailed capacity analysis of the intersection of to the west. Amore p G e rvais Avenue and White Bear Avenue was also conducte d as part of the EAW. This study d indicates that the current intersection, which operates at Level of Service C+ will continue to operate at this same • service i n the year 1991, one year after full development high level of se Y Avenue west of Kennard of the project. Additional studies of Gervais will be undertaken by t applicant's he traffic consultants, if requested staff prior to the Planning Commissi by City p on meeting. • this letter - memorandum, parking is provided in As described throughout ga g ra es and surface parking lots. Nine hundred Seventy-five (975) p parking spaces are provided consistent with ordinance requirements. -six (426) spaces are located Four hundred twenty in parking garages, aces are consistent with the 1:1 ordinance requirement and 549 spaces n surface parking located i in areas. Parking garages will be constructed of the same exterior materials as the apartment homes. 33 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. .Mr. Geoffrey Olson October 3, 1988 Page 14 4. Provision . of A Variety of Active and Passi Recreational Facilities, Trails , Open en S ace, and Distinct Landsca A variety of active and passive recreational facilities, trails, and open space has been incorporated in the proposed Development* Distinctive exterior amenitie s proposed include outdoor swimming pool, p tennis courts, volleyball court, shuffleboard courts, basketball courts putting green, park-like courtyards, including picnic and P g barbecue areas, I several small , playlots , as recommended by staff, including wooden playground structures, ponds, and open lawn areas. Walkin g jogging and trails•, including a Vita exercise course are also shown on the submitted development plans. Consistent with the Comprehensive, Plan and recommendations of staff, if desired by the City, the on -site private trail system can connect with future public trails to Maplewood Park to the west and to Mapleridge Mall to the east. Additional indoor recreational facilities will be provided in the recreation building located in the southern quadrant of the Site including sauna, whirlpool, indoor swimming pool, steam room, game room, and exercise facilities. As shown on the grading and landscape plans submitted as part of the Application, finished grades will provide varying topography throughout the Site. Landscape boulder retaining walls, and extensive new s proposed. Proposed plant species range from juni plantings are per , p ro P ew, arborvitae, and Russian cypress evergreen shrubs to small Y deciduous shrubs, such as pote nt i l la and viburnum, to large deciduous shrubs such as dogwood and a uo nymus , to coniferous trees such as Colorado spruce and Austrian pine, to flowering trees such as crab apple, amur maple, and Japanese tree lilac, to shade trees such as PP linden autumn purple ash, gree nspire , marshall's ash, and sugar maple, to flowers such as dayl i ly, tulip, and f leecef lower. ___ 5. Protection of On Site Wetlands and Provision of Drainag and 1 Erosion Control Consistent with City and Rams e -Washi n ton Metro Watershed District Standards. As described in g reater detail in the EAW prepared for the Development, the Site includes four wetland basins whose on -site acreage ranges from .17 acres to 2.03 acres. Two of these wetland basins, which are located in the northeast quadrant of the Site, collectively comprise Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Protected Wetland 62 -150. The proposed Development has been designed to protect the state- protected P wetland basins from adverse development impacts. No filling of either of these wetland proposed* 1 nd basins is Subject to further analysis, a P protected waters permit application will be submitted to the DNR to allow for P lacement of a small area of pedestrian walking trail on a bo ardwalk along the wetland's border, installation of stormwater outlet 34 LAI?KIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGI?EN, LTD. Mr, Geoffrey Olson October 3 1988 Page 15 structures, and temporary operation of machinery along a small portion of the wetland during construction of retaining walls and /or rip -rap slope s t abilization structures above the w etland's ordinary high -water mark.' Impacts from these activities are expected to be minor. two small The Site also includes topographically perched wetland basins which are not state- protected wetlands but which do fall within the permitting jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. These P n • g b a n excavated and elsewhere basins .will be eliminated and replaced y P on the Site. Both of the affected basins are marginal in a number of w land functions, including wildlife habitat. Information included in et the EAW for the Development indicates that alteration of these isolated wetlands which totally comprise approximately 1.57 acres, falls within an existing nationwide Section 404 Corps permit. In-response to staff comments, setbacks from the northerly protected wetland basin to Building 5 and an activities building have been increased as compared to previous plans. The current setback from the activities building to the pond is 12 feet as compared to 7 feet, and the current setback from Building 5 to the pond is 20 feet, as compared to a PP roximately , 15 feet. In addition, reconfiguration of structures and reduction in the originally proposed number of units have also reduced the elevation difference between these buildings and the pond, which is a more preferable design solution. The extent of this change is shown on the submitted site and grading plans. The ro osed Development also includes drainage and erosion control P P measures consistent with City and Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District standards and responsive to DNR and Corps of Engineers concerns. For a more detailed discussion of the proposed drainage and erosion control P lans, see the EAW submitted with the Application. 6. Utilities As shown on the utility plans submitted as part of the Application, municipal water facilities are located in Gervais Avenue. These facili • tie P • s have adequate capacity. to serve the proposed Development. P Wastewater from the Development is currently proposed to flow to the north to tie into an existing ten -inch municipal sanitary sewer facility. Because the City's existing comprehensive sewer plan raises a question about ultimate capacity of this sewer l i n e , the developer is cooperating with the City in a study of the existing and projected P g expected to be completed capacity of this facility. This study is ex p within the next one to two weeks* 35 LARK IN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. Mr. Geoffrey Olson October 3, 1988 Page 16 7. Compliance with Findings for Approval of PUD Co nditional Use Permit. The development plans, together with the pictorial and textual materials submitted with the Application, indicate that the proposed Development on the Site meets the findings contained in Section 36 -442 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding approval of a PUD conditional use permit as follows: (a) The ro osed multifamily housing on the Site will be in p p conformity with the Comprehensive Plan, assuming approval of the deve lope is companion request for amendment of the Comprehensive Plan designation of the Site from Limited Service Commercial (LSC) to High - Density Residential (Rh See preceding sections of this letter - memorandum for a statement 'in support of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment. (b) The establishment or maintenance of the proposed Development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare. As described throughout this letter - memorandum, multifamily housing is an appropriate use for the Site. High-quality, g hi h- amenity apartment homes for families and single managerial, technical, and professional employees are ro osed. 1989 rents are expected to be $550 to $630 for p p a one-bedroom apartment home, $6 5 0 to $730 for a two - bedroom apartment home and $750 to $830 for a three- bedroom apartment home. An on -site resident manager will assure continuing maintenance of the homes and grounds. Multifamily housing will provide a transition between the more intense business and industrial uses to the east and south and the residential uses to the west and north. The Development is not expected to have. a significant effect on surrounding uses for the reasons set forth throughout this letter- memorandum. (c) The ro osed use will be compatible with the character of the p p existing Zoning district. A Planned Unit Development for multifamily apartment artment homes is allowed in the LBC district. As discussed throughout this letter- memorandum, a PUD conditional use permit provides a greater degree of control than a rezoning of the Site to R-3* The PUD conditional use permit P assures that development will occur in conformance with the approved plans and any conditions attached to approval* Any change e i n the approved development requires new public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council and a showin g that approval of a new PUD conditional use permit meets Zoning Ordinance findings. If, on the other hand, the 36 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DAIX & LINDGIREN, LTD. Mr. Geoffrey Olson October 3, 1988 Page 17 Site were rezoned to R -3 and the approved Development did not occur, another apartment project would be a permitted use and as such entitled to issuance of a building permit as a matter of right, assuming conformance with other Zoning Ordinance requirements. (d) The proposed Development will not depreciate property values. The developer has conducted a number of studies of property Values of single - family residential areas located in close proximity to high -value multifamily rental housing. These studies, which will be available for the Planning Commission hearing, indicate that single- family homes in proximity to high -value multifamily rental housing appreciate at equal or greater rates as compared to single - family homes not located adjacent to multifamily rental housing* (e) The proposed Development on the Site will not be hazardous, detrimental, or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses. The EAW submitted with the 'Application indicates that the proposed Development meets noise standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency* Lighting will be shielded and directed downward and will not spill over onto adjacent residential properties. Odor and fumes are not expected to be generated by the proposed Development. Stormwater runoff is expected to be accommodated in on -site facilities and existing municipal systems and is not expected to affect neighboring properties. The architectural design of the apartment homes, together with the extensive bermi ng and landscaping proposed, will assure an attractive image of the Development and will minimize views from neighboring residences* (f) The proposed Development will not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will unduly burden area properties. On both a p.me peak hour and daily basis, the proposed Development generates substantially fewer vehicular trips than an office development which is a permitted use under the existing LBC zoning. A detailed study of the Gervais /White Bear Avenue intersection, which is expected to be the primary intersection affected by the proposed Development, indicates that adequate capacity will be available to accommodate development trips* Completion of the proposed Development is not expected to change the existing high level of service at this intersection. Further study of Gervais Avenue west of Kennard will be undertaken in cooperation with staff, if requested during the review process. 37 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. Mr. Geoffrey Olson October 3, 1988 Page 18 (g) The multifamily housing on the Site will be served by essential public services such as streets, police and firer utilities, schools, and parks. Police and fire protection is available lable to serve the property and the Development includes a ai number of on -site private recreational facilities to minimize off -site burdens on public parks. As recommended by staff and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the development plans include a private trail system which can connect in the future to a public trail facility to Maplewood Park to the west of the Site. Municipal water facilities are available to accommodate the proposed Development. The capacity of the receiving sanitary sewer l i n e to the north of the Site and of area schools are under further study. (h) The use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services. The developer has not requested revenue bond or tax increment financing assistance for the Development. If improvements to local roadways or sewer facilities are required, it is expected that such improvements would also be required for a permitted use office development on the Site* In any event, the Development will pay its fair share of any public improvements which are required to serve the Development and properties within an improvement district within which the Site may be located. (i) As described throughout this letter- memorandum, the proposed Development preserves two on -site state - protected wetlands and preserves much of the slopes and existing mature trees along the northerly perimeter of the Site 4b Twenty -three percent (23 %) of the Site will remain undisturbed by the proposed construction* After development of the proposed apartment homes, approximately 60 percent of the Site will consist of preserved ponds, slopes, and mature trees , and open space, recreational amenities, and new berms and plantings. (') An EAW has been prepared for the proposed Development. It J concludes that the project does not have the potential for significant adverse environmental effects. Refer to the EAW for further detail. (k) Although the Zoning Ordinance authorizes the City Council to approve substantial variances from the provisions of the PP • nit deve 1 me nts , the proposed o Zoning Ordinance for planned u P Development does not require any variances from the Zoning Ordinance. 0 LAI .KIN, HOFFMAN, DAIX & LINDGI EN, LTD. Mr. Geof f rey Olson October 3, 1988 Page 19 If Y ou have any questions concerning the proposed Development or this - narrat ive , please feel free to give me a call* Sincerely, Linda H. Fisher, for .LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. cc: Mr Ken Be lgarde Mr. Scott England M r . Gene Ernst Mr. Dick Schabert Mr. Dan Lute negge r Mr . Ron Peterson Mr. Chuck Rickart LHF.A XO 39 EXHIBIT A TO NARRATIVE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR AMENITIES PROPOSED PROPERTY LOCATION: - West of the intersection of Gervais. Avenue and White Bear Avenue in the City of Maplewood NUMBER OF UNITS: 426 total, composed of: 74 One bedroom units (17.4') 233 Two bedroom units (54.7 %) 119 Three bedroom units (27.9 %) GARAGES: 416 standard surface garages 10 R.V. garages 54 9 surf ace parking AMENITIES: Bath and 3/4 in all three bedroom units and most two bedroom units Bath and 1/2 in the balance of the two bedroom units Euro -style kitchens Walk -in closets Architecturally designed closet storage systems Panel doors Dishwashers Microwaves Drapes Ice makers Casablanca -type dining room fans Vaulted ceilings Ceiling fans in master bedrooms Exercise facilities Saunas Whirlpools Steam Room Social Room Game Room Billiards Large screen television _ Television Lounge Cable television Tanning Beds Party Room Day care Indoor swimming pool Outdoor swimming pool Water features Wood playground structures 40 Proposed Property Page 2 AMENITIES - Two tennis courts _ (Continued) : Racquet ball courts Volley ball courts Basketball court Shuffle Board Putting Greens Vita Course Jogging paths Horseshoe pits Picnic and barbeque areas Landscape rock retaining walls Park like courtyards Mature landscaping Mini- storage and RV storage Indented unit entries in corridor Decorated corridors 2x6 exterior wall construction Double wall staggered stud soundproofing in party walls Gyperet , e soundinsulation and sound channels between floors KCB:bb 9/27/88 41 1 DAVID J. PEAT & LINDGREN L TD - FRANCIS E. GIBERSON MICHAEL, T. MaKIM JAMES P. LARKIN f LAR 1N f �jp FMAN, DALY CHARLES R. WEAVER ROBERT L. HOFFMAN JACK F. DALY ATTORNEYS AT LAW HERMAN L. TALLE WILLIAM S. BRANDY D. KENNETH LINDGREN ANDREW W. DANIELSON VINCENT G. ELLA TRACY R. EICHHORN WENDELL R ANDERSON ANDREW J MITCHELL GERALD H. FRIEDELL 2000 PIPER JAFFRAY TOWER JOHN A. COTTER M ROBERT B. WHITLOL 1500 NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CENTER BEATRICE A. ROTHWEILER E. MULLIGAN ALLAN MULLIGAN ROBERT J. HENN S 7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH 222 SOUTH NINTH STREET PAUL B. PLUNKETT AMY DARR GRADY JAMES C. EDWARD J. DRI S.COLL 31 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNES MINNESOTA 554OTA 550 - ALAN L. KILDO KATHLEEN M. PICOTTE NEWMAN WIL JAMES P. MILEY FULLER BLOOMINGTON, TELEPHONE (612) 338 CATHERINE BARNETT C. ANDERSON GENE N DAVID C. SELLERGREN TELEPHONE (612) 835 -3800 (6i21 338'1002 JEFFREY DANIEL L. B RICHARD J. K JOHN O. FULLMER TELECOPIER (612) 835 '5102 TELECOPIER TKOV TODD M. VLATKOVICH TIMOTHY J. MCMANUS ROBERT E. BOYLE JILL 1. FRIEDERS FRANK 1. HARVEY GREGORY E. KORSTAD RICHARD A. FORSCHLER NORTH SUBURBAN OFFICE CRAIG A. PETERSON CHARLES S. MODELL CHRISTOPHER J. DIETZEN SPRINGBROOK DRIVE, SUITE 250 LISA A. GRAY GARY A. E JOHN R. BEATTI.E LINDA H. FISHER 8990 COON RAPIDS, MINNESOTA 55433 m. WEAVER THOMAS H. WEAVER SHANNON K. MCCAMBRIDGE THOMAS P. STOLTMAN STEVEN G. LEVIN FORREST O. NOWLIN TELEPHONE (612) 786 -7117 MICHAEL S. COHEN DENISE M. NORTON GARY A. VAN CLEVE MICHAEL C. JACKMAN JOHN E. DIEHL TELECOPIER 1612) 786 - 6711 MICHAEL B. BRAMAN JOSEPH DICKER JON S. SWIERZEWSKI JACQUELI NE F. DIETZ THOMAS J. FLYNN GAYLEN L. KNACK JAMES P. QUINN RODNEY D. IVES TODD 1. FREEMAN JULIE A. WRASE STEPHEN B. SOLOMON PETER K. BECK • R to Bloomington CHRISTOPHER J. HARRISTHA RONALD M. STARK,JR. JEROME H. KAHNKE SHERRILL OMAN KURETICH SHARON C NAGA LI MARfKAY CANAGA LITZAU GERALD L. BECK JOHN B. LUNDQUIST DAYLE NO.LAN THOMAS B. HUMPHREY, JR. OF COUNSEL JOSEPH GITIS JOHN A. MCHUGH RICHARD A. NORDBYE 14 E ICI O R A N *ALSO ADMITTED IN WISCONSIN f f re Olson, City of Maplewood T0. Geo ffrey Director Community Deve lopment o FROM: Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. DATE. November 4, 1988 • • it Multifamily Rental Housing on • Studies of Effect of H i gh -Qual y St RE . Property Valu es of Adjacent Single - Fame. ly Homes Introduction: lue studies p is a summary of two property va prepared by this he effect of The following r se studies was to determine t office* The objective of the -f ami 1 residential nt is 1 property • al housing on adjacent single-family value values. . Two different methodologies were used for the property rec iat ion. • - 1 sales rice and ( 2) market value app studies: C p 1. Sale Price Study Methodolo : • that is comparable, for property development in Maplewood multifamily A multifamily BBY Partnership value assessment purposes, s proposed to • • r Avenue is Century Ridge . Because hous i n at Gerva is and White Bea of market value g built i n 1987 , ther is no h istor Y Century Ridge was cha ng which . ate the impact of the apartments upo es can be used to evalu i de nt i a 1 property va 1 ue s adjacent single - family re s ner. First, the • in another man P ice Stud quantif ies the impact f sin le- family The Sale r Y earched for the addresses g Multiple Listing Service was s . e which were sold in 1988. Two ' n the vicinity of Century Ridg L ne . These two homes i 2689 Mayer Lane and 2695 Mayer a homes were identified; ith 3 00 feet of Century Ridge and homeS were selecte d because they are w 42 Attachment ll LACK IN, H OFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD• be seen from the homes. These homes are the apartments can clearly he stud as the mblers. They are referred to in t Y three _ bedroom ra "Adjacent Properties. . homes were found in the. r ice. and market value for both Assessor's The sale p Value on file at the Ramsey County Certificates of Real Estate exceeded the assessor' s office. The percentage that the sale price homes that cal for each of the single-family market value was ca p erties . collectively comprise the Adjacent p ' mil homes (the Control Group) was Next, a control group of single - fa Y Multiple Listing N to the Adjacent Properties. The Mu p . selected to compare ,to . if the Control Group. Five criteria were Service was searched to identify mes had to be used to select the Control Group homes. The ho 1. 3- bedroom; 2. Ramblers; • area and neig hborhood Located in the same ar as the Adjacent 3. P ro p 8 Range 22, in Maplewood; Properties (Section 1, Township 2 , 9 4. Sold in 1988; 5. Not within view of Century Ridge Apartments* • Multiple Listing Service data base Application of these criteria to the p 1 Estate Value and six homes.. The Certificates o Rea generated a list of , records were consulted to obtain the the Ramsey County Assessor s office rec home. The percentage Y • assessor's market value sale price and the for each that the sale price exceeded the assess market value was calculated for each Control Group home. Resul • Properties exceeded the assessor' s The sale prices for the Adjacent Pr p e r ice s for the percent and 10 percent. The sal p of market value by 15 p assessor's market value by an average Control Group homes exceeded the asses 13 percent. • ill Lynch who listed the Adjacent Consultations with realtors from Merr Y made in the indicate that , proximity Properties in t no downward adjustments were � hese homes due to their close pr Y realtors' market comparison of t received no adverse to Century Ridge Ap artments. These listing agents p roximity comments from prospective buyers about the p of Century Ridge to rket 11 days • erties . 2 6 9 5 Mayer Lane was on the ma • t sold. the Adjacent Prop market 69 days before i before it sold; 2689 Mayer Lane was on the (2.) 43 I,.,,A I3.K IN, H n FFMAN, DALY & LINDGIREN, LTD. • days on the market for the six is compares with an .average of 77 s Y • r Rid Th p which were not within sight of Century e 9 Control Group homes w Apartments. ADJAI Year Address Built 2689 Mayer Lane (1959) 2695 Mayer Lane (19 5 9 ) SALE PR ENT PROPERTIES Section 1, Sale Price (SP) in 1988 85,000 81,000 ICE ( SOLD IN 1988 ) T28, R22 Market Value (MV) Percent SP in 1988 is above MV 73,900 15% 73,800 10% SALE PRICE CONTROL GROUP (SOLD IN 19 8 8 ) Section 1, T28, R22 2. Marke Va lue A Stud Methodolo :. ' Maplewood, White Bear Lake, Rosev i 1 le , surve ed are located in Mapl • Pr operties Y Plymouth, and Bloomington. • homes surrounded exclusively by • a control group of First, f si ou was selected in each of the mil homes (the Control Group), , s ing le- f a Y value of each home in the Control Group cities 1 i s ted above . The market inclusive) was obtained from the for a p eriod of eight years (1981 1988 (3) 44 Market Year Sale Price Value (MV) 1988 Percent SP is above MV A ddress Built (SP) in 1988 in ' Da 48 O' Day (1955) 73,000 64,600 76,000 13$ 0� 2525 Mayer (1956.) (1959) 76,000 80,400 73, 600 9� 2625 Mayer 47 Ferndale (1956) 77 000 � 59,500 75,4 00 29% 6� n 2567 Upper Afton ( 1955) (1973) 79,900 90 , 000 74F400 21% 211 B rooky iew Ct Average % SP is above MV = 13% 2. Marke Va lue A Stud Methodolo :. ' Maplewood, White Bear Lake, Rosev i 1 le , surve ed are located in Mapl • Pr operties Y Plymouth, and Bloomington. • homes surrounded exclusively by • a control group of First, f si ou was selected in each of the mil homes (the Control Group), , s ing le- f a Y value of each home in the Control Group cities 1 i s ted above . The market inclusive) was obtained from the for a p eriod of eight years (1981 1988 (3) 44 LARK IN, HO FFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. • � P increases in property values assessor's office. Perc g appropriate sor were calculated for each home a nd an average .increase for each group was computed. • located adjacent to high - quality xt a soup of single- family homes cities listed. above. Ne , g • housin was chosen in each of the n multifamily rental ,g the "Comparable Group. • of single - family homes was d home This group he market value for each single- As with the Control Group r t • om arable Group was obtained fora period of eight years within the C P ciation ercentages calculated and (1981-1988 inclusive) and appre p averaged* Results: Maplewood: Group consisted C ity of Maplewood, the Control Gr p d of single - family G roup In the C Y l s subdivision* The Comparable G p consisted homes in Stanich Highland d'acent to Greengate of single-family homes in Hi llcrest Gardens a Apartments* • n average of .1895%e Comparable Group a 1 Grou homes apprec by a g Control o p homes appreciated by an average of 20.5%. White Bear Lake: • Control Group consisted of single- e City of White Bear Lake, the Co Group consisted of In th Y • le subdivision. The Compar able P family homes in Sunnyda , and Rearrangement of White Bear • anvil homes in the Dotte s Plat single-family Y to Cher Park subdivisions adj acent Y Court Apartments* Comparable Group • average of 23.2 Group homes appreciated by an g Control p homes appreciated by an average of 23.3% • Roseville: • ou consisted City of Roseville, the Control Gr p d of single-family* u consisted of In the • C Y � t addition. The Comparable Gro p homes in joy' Rice Stree and Plat 3 adjacent to Palisades i g sin le- family homes n the Ed Boss Apartments* • average Group homes appreciated by an a of 21.5%. Comparable Group g Control p c homes appreciated by an average of 21% • (4,a 45 L A CK IN, H OFFMAN, DAILY LINDGREN, LTD. Bloomington: silted of single - family of Bloomington, the Control Group con ' cons i sted of In the-C Addition The Comparable Group cons i homes in Jacobsen -Quest Add to Pebblebrook single- family homes in Pebblebrook West adjacent Apartments. • of 26.6 Comparable Group Control Group homes appreciated by an average homes appreciated by an average of 26.5%. Plymouth: - family consisted of single e City single consisted of In th Y of Plymouth, the Control Group co • Hills 7 th Add The Comparable Group homes in imperial Hil cent to Plymouth Colony - f am i 1 single Y homes in Oakwood Manor adjacent Apartments* • of 2096%o Comparable Group Control Group homes appreciated by an a vera a g homes appreciated by an average of 22.2% . The following table summari zes the results of the Market Value Appreciation Study: Conclusion From Sale Price Study and Market Value Appreciation Study The Sale Price. Study and the Market Value Appreciation Study show that multifamily housing does not depreciate property values of adjacent 46 (59) comparable p Control Multifamily Group Group % Increase C�� Housing Increase Maplewood Greengate 20.5% 18.5 White Bear Lake Cherry Cour t 23.3$ 23.2$ Roseville • Palisades 21.0$ 21.5$ Bloomington Pebblebrook 26.5 26.6$ P1 outh ym Plymouth colony 22.2 20.6 Plymouth Oakwood 18.0 20.6% Conclusion From Sale Price Study and Market Value Appreciation Study The Sale Price. Study and the Market Value Appreciation Study show that multifamily housing does not depreciate property values of adjacent 46 (59) LAKKI N , HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. le- fanvil homes surroundi ng it housing. In many .cases, sing Y .s i ng le- f family erce nta e i ncreases than Control multifamily famil housing exhibited . greater p g value actual sale prices and property Group homes* In all ca ses Proper ties /Comparable Group were • for the Adjacent Prop / percentage increases . ces and roperty value percentage increases comparable to actual sale prices P P for the Control Groups. 47 (616) LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. MAPLEWOOD COMPAR GROUP SINGLE- FAMILY HOMES IN HILLCREST GARDENS AWACS TT To GREENGATE AP (BUILT 1974 ) SECTION 14, T29, R22 t Average Appreciation = 20.5% (Year Percent Address Built) 1988 1981 Appreciation 2175 Ripley Avenue (1937) 61,500 54,198 13.5% 1812 Furness Street (1959) 79,900 67,229 18.9% 1736 Furness Street (1938) 62,100 52,555 18.2% 1842 Furness Street (1972) (1967) 67,800 72,100 53,423 60,500 2699% 19.2% 1846 1850 Furness Furness Street Street (1937) 73,000 56 , 542 29.2% 1880 Furness Street (1936) 57,600 50,418 1493% 1890 Furness Street (1938) 66,600 54,884 21.4% 1900 Furness Street (1937) 61,800 50,288 22.9% Average Appreciation = 20.5% LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGI?EN, LTD. WLB=D CONTROL GROUP Average Appreciation = 18.5% 8. 1 49 f STANICH HIGHLANDS SECTION 14, T29, R22 ( Year Percent Address Built) 1988 1981 Appreciation 1727 Ruth Street (1954) 60,300 51,991 16.0% 1721 Ruth Street (1954) 64,600 56,412 1495% 1713 Ruth Street (1954) 71,000 55,474 28.2% 1699 Ruth Street (1955) 64,300 53,361 20.5% 1686 Stanich Place (1972) 67,000 58,343 1499% 1694 Stanich Place (1968) 70,500 59,124 19.3% 1708 Stanich Place (1954) 63,200 51,320 23.2% 1714 Stanich Place (1960) 65,000 56,210 15.8% 1980 Price Avenue (1969) 76,700 66,782 1499% Average Appreciation = 18.5% 8. 1 49 f LARK IN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGIUEN, LTD. WHITE BEAR LAKE COMPARABLE GROUP Addres SINGLE FAMILY HOMES IN DOT'I'E' S PLAT AND REARRANGEMENT OF WHITE BEAR PARK ( BUILT 196 3 ) SECTION T30, R22 - (Year Percent Built) 1988 1981 reciation 4015 Hazel Street North (1948) 83,000 66,628 24.6% 4035 Hazel Street North (1948) 71,800 56,127 2799% 4055 Hazel Street North (1971) 87,900 65,627 33.9% 4075 Hazel Street North (1971) 75,800 60,684 2499% 4079 Hazel Street North (1971) 72,800 57,539 26.5% 2132 County Road F East (1959) 77,100 64,083 20.3% 2126 County Road F East (1949) 81,300 65,217 24.7% 2118 County Road F East (1955) 66,300 57,637 15.0% 2092 County Road F East (1960) 70,200 55,135 27.4% 2131 Dotte Drive (1972) 85,800 71;678 19.7% 2068 Dotte Drive (1967) 95,000 75,791 2594% 2050 Dotte Drive (1959) 76,100 66,198 15.0% 2046 Dotte Drive (1959) 114,600 91,735 24.9% 2040 Dotte Drive (1956) _68,300 58 17.2% Average Appreciation = 23.3% 0 (9 50 r 1 r t LAIE?-KIN, HOFFMAN, DAIX LINDGREN, LTD. W HITE BEAR LAKE CONTROL GROUP SUNNYDALE SUBDIVISION SECTION 26, T30, R22 Average Appreciation = 23.2% (101 51 ( Year Percent Address Built) 1988 1981 Appreciation 3890 Van DY ke Street (1954) 79,700 62,692 27.2 2061 Roth Place (1954) 69,400 57,782 20.2% 2069 Roth Place (1954) 64,900 53,686 20.9% 2075 Roth Place (1954) 68,200 55,679 22.5% 2099 Roth Place (1956) 74,500 58,407 27.5% 2105 Roth Place (1954) 68,200 55,396 23.1% 2111 Roth Place (1955) 70 56,146 25.1% 2121 Roth Place (1956) 66,700 55,577 20.0% 2127 Roth Place (1956) 71,800 59,932 19.8% 2133 Roth Place (1956) 74,900 59,967 24.9% 2104 Roth Place (1955) 72,300 58,004 24.8% 2098 Roth Place (1954) 68,400 55,139 24.1 % - 2090 Roth Place (1954) 75,600 62,494 21.0% 2084 Roth Place (1956) 77,100 61,776 2498% Average Appreciation = 23.2% (101 51 LARK IN, HOFFMAN, DAI Y & LINDGREN, LTD. ROSEVILLE COMPARABLE GROUP SINGLE - FAMILY HOMES IN ED BOSSARD ADDITION PLAT 3 (BUILT 1972) SECTION 12, T29, R23 w � Average Appreciation = 21% C l l ) 52 ( Year Percent Address Built) 1988 1981 Appreciation 491 County Road B West (1964) 102,600 85,570 20.0% 2185 Cohansey Boulevard (1962) 79,600 62,330 27.7% 2189 Cohansey Boulevard (1969) 78,100 59,320 31.7% 2193 Cohansey Boulevard (1974) 76 61,922 23.1% 2199 Cohansey Boulevard (1971) 75 61,948 22.0% 2211 Cohansey Boulevard (1972) 73,900 65 12.5% 2219 Cohansey Boulevard (1973) 76,100 63,198 20.4% 2229 Cohansey Boulevard (1975) 71 63,185 12.7% 2239 Cohansey Boulevard (1973) 79,300 66,561 19.2% Average Appreciation = 21% C l l ) 52 r LA.]E?K IN, HOFFMAN, DALY SAC LINDGREN, LTD. ROSEVILLE CONTROL GROUP JOY'S RICE STREET ADDITION SECTION 12, T29, R23 Average Appreciation = 21.5% (12.) 53 ( Year Percent Address Built) 1988 1981 Appreciation 2339 Hand Avenue (1968) 83,000 69. 1 175 2090% 2321 Hand Avenue (1957) 81,00 63,304 28.0% 2313 Hand Avenue (1959) 65,000 55,289 18.6% 2307 Hand Avenue (1956) 65,900 54,296 21.4% 2293 Hand Avenue (1957) 67,300 54,719 23.0% 361 Minnesota Avenue (1956) 66,000 55,414 19.2% 2292 Western Avenue (1958) 119,800 99 , 774 20.1% 2304 Western Avenue (1970) 83,800 68,491 22.4% 2322 Western Avenue (1938) 67,200 55,486 21.1$ Average Appreciation = 21.5% (12.) 53 LAIRKIN, HOFFMAN, DAEY & LINDGREN, LTD. Average Appreciation = 26.5% (13.) 54 BLO M I NGTON COMPARABLE GROUP SINGLE- FAMILY HOMES IN PEBBLEBROOK WEST ( BUILT 1975 ) SECTION 18, T27, R24 ( Year Percent Address Built) 1988 1981 Appreciation 4210 Pebblebrook Drive (1979) 104,300 80,900 28.9% 4200 Pebblebrook Drive (1977) 101,600 76,200 33.3% 4120 Pebblebrook Drive (1977) 103,100 97,200 6.1% 4110 Pebblebrook Drive (1974) 129,600 101,200 28.0% 4100 Pebblebrook Drive (1976) 107,800 84,000 2894% 4020 Pebblebrook Drive (1974) 125,400 96,200 3013% 4010 Pebblebrook Drive (1974) 125,800 97,200 30.5% Average Appreciation = 26.5% (13.) 54 LANK IN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGI3EN, LTD. Address 8940 12th Avenue South 8900 12th Ave nue South 8850 12th Avenue South 8840 12th Ave nue South 8830 12th Avenue South 8 812 12 th Ave nue South 8800 12th Avenue South BLOOMINGTON CONTROL GROUP JACOBSEN -QUIST ADDITION SECTION 11 T27, R24 ( Year Percent Built) 1988 1981 Appreciation (1953) 79,800 60,400 3290% (1953) 70,300 54,200 28.6% (1953) 72,900 53,600 36.0% (1953) 67,800 55,300 2296% (1953) 66,200 53,300 24.2% (1952) 70,500 57,700 2293% (1953) 66,400 54,900 21.0% Average Appreciation = 26.6% (14.) 55 l LAIRK IN, HOFFMAN, DAILY & LINDGMEN, LTD. PLYMOUTH GOMPARABZE GROUP C15.) 56 SINGLE - FAMILY HOMES IN OAKWOOD MANOR SUBDIVISION (BUILT 1972) SECTION 30, Tll8, R22 ( Year Percent a Address Built) 1988 1981 Appreciation 1835 Merrimac Lane North (1962) 74,200 60,200 23.3% 1825 Merrimac Lane North (1960) 73,000 58,700 24.5% 1815 Merrimac Lane North (1960) 88,900 71,300 24.6% 1735 Merrimac Lane North (1966) 80,700 64,900 24.3% i 1725 Merrimac Lane North (1965) 86,500 74,600 1690% 1715 Merrimac Lane North (1966) 65,800 53,400 2393% 1705 Merrimac Lane North (1963) 78,500 65,600 1997% Average Appreciation = 22.2% C15.) 56 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. PLYMOUTH CONTROL GROUP IMPERIAL HILLS 7TH ADDITION SECTION 30, T118, R22 Average Appreciation = 20.6% LHF:AX4 16 57 ( Year Percent .Address Built) 1988 1981 Appreciation 2025 Urbandale North (1970) 139,000 111,100 25.1% 2105 Urbandale North (1970) 106,600 85 24.5% 2115 Urbandale North (1972) 121,200 97,900 23.8% 2125 Urbandale North (1970) 105,300 85,500 23.2% 2205 Urbandale North (1973) 114,700 101 1396% 2215 Urbandale North (1970) 95,300 82 16.3% 2225 Urbandale North (1969) 96,200 81,400 18.2% Average Appreciation = 20.6% LHF:AX4 16 57 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: The Effect of Multiple Dwellings on Adjacent Single- Dwelling Horne Values DATE: February 7, 1985 Whenever a hearing for a multiple dwelling, adjacent to single dwellings is held, neighbors always argue that their property values w i l l depreciate. To question thi s bel i of is like argui rig against motherhood or appl a - pi e.. In order to _ separate fact from myth, I have done some research. The following i s a l i s t of the only studies I could find in the metro area: 1. The City of Coon Rapids (1978 -81 data)- -city assessor This study compares the sales ratio (assessor's value /average actual sales price) of single dwellings over the whole city versus single dwellings adjacent to apartments, double dwellings and home occupations. The result is that there was no significant difference in the value of homes. 2. The City of Brooklyn Center (1982 -83 data)- -city assessor This is a similar study to that done in Coon Rapids. This study also found no significant* difference in the value of single dwellings adjacent to multiple dwellings versus the average value of single dwellings city— wide, , I t is i nteresti ng to note that , parks had a slightly negative effect on adjacent home values. 3. A study by the Boscl ai r Corporation for the City of Bloomington (1960 -70 sales data from Bloomington, New Hope, St. Louis Park and Edina) . This study shows that homes adjacent to multiple dwellings had a slightly higher value 4. A study by North Star Appraisal for the City of Savage (1980 sales data from Apple Valley and Burnsville) This study was based on the effect of quad developments on adjacent single dwellings. This study also found that there was no adverse effect on the property values of adjacent homes. There was also no increase in marketing time. A survey of - ad homeowners found a positive attitude toward the quads. Homeowners did not feel the . projects reduced their property values, polluted their vision or increased the number of undesirables in the neighborhood. 63 0 Attachment 12 5. A study by Lafayette and Pierce, In c.--real estate appraisers for Castle Design and Development Co. (1984) This study is based on a proposed eight. building, 64 —unit apartment development in Maplewood called S ' terli ng Glen. This study found that the apartments woul d not be a deterrent to the overall marketability or value of adjacent homes. Conclusion Council should not base denial of a multiple dwelling project on the negative effect on adjacent property values, unless there is something specific about a -pro j ect that differentiates it from multiple dwellings in general. A v a i l a b l e studies do not show a negative effect on property values or marketing time of adjacent homes. ' cc: Council ` Planning commission HRA CDRB Associate planners Concerns re d'n development of proposed Belgrade housin complex: 1. Proximity of proposed walkin trail to ' Bittersweet Lane cul-de-sac could promote additional automobile traffic on Bittersweet Lane by non-residents of the neighborhood wishing to use this trail. Also, trail appears to be ver close to wetland area and surel will be a disturbance to protected wildlife. 2. What would be the impact on Maplewood schools of several hundred children who would take residence at the Belgrade complex? overcrowding? Increased property taxation? 3. What are the guarantees that rents, which supposedly are only affordable b the " managerial, technical professionals will not become subsidized, thus allowing lower-income families to take up residence there. Low- income housin would depreciate property values of the surrounding residential neighborhoods, and result in a g reater number of children in the complex. 4. With cutbacks in public service, it would seem unlikely that cit service departments will be able to deter increased crime in our area, which will result b addin additional permanent residents. 5. It seems that Gervais Ave. located to the west of the Belgrade entrances/exits would not be ade to accommodate traffic resulting from the building of the Belgrade housing complex. Traffic congestion around the Mapleridge Center and the 'intersection of White Bear Ave. at Gervais Ave. is already -a major 'inconvenience, and accidents are not uncommon. 6. As discreet as the parkin facility li is supposed to be, it is bound to detrimentally affect surrounding r ident'al housing. As residents of 2575 Southlawn Drive, re sidential 1 we are constantly aware of the bright lighting of Mapleridge Center. The Belgrade housing complex will be much closer to our property than Mapleridge Center is, and anyone tr to illuminate 31 acres of land is bound to disturb neighbors. 7. At the neighborhood meeting called by the developers, it was stated that it would take approximately three years to construct the 426 apartment complex and do landscaping. That is a lon time to be inconvenienced b bulldozers and other construction noises. And what g uarantee do we have that developers won't run out of funds and chan building plans in mid-stream. Respectfully, Mark and Sandra Peterson � �r.�' 2575 Southlawn Drive r�' Maplewood, MN 55109 60 Attachment 13 1 ) • At the time of the report, questions remained unresolved as the the adequacy of the present sewer service to handle the new o sed apartments on th Pr Po P e 31 acre tract. Also, in the report, it said: At the present, there are no lans to p extend any streets northward to connect to Bittersweet or Flandrau . This does not =xz mean that there is a permanent guarantee that this wouldn't happen in the future. At the meeting with the city council, the neighbors were unanimoumous i g n stating their, opposition to rhd and favor for Limitied Commercial Service. That opinion is unchanged. LCS provides a tax base without . an of the accompanying y pressures put on social services, such as fire, police, etc. Businessmen are good neighbors: we cannot guarantee the same for the proposed apartment dwellers. I love our conunity the way that it is with everythin g from pheasants to deer in our backyard, Even more, I love to look out the front window d an see all of. the small children being able to ride their tricycles, etc. on or near the street without a great fear of heavy or fast traffic. I am sure that the ax parents of these children bought in the area for the same exact reasons I was ill and unable to tkx attend the most recent meeting with the ro sed P Po developers of the land, BBY . However, I vas told that the meetin g between the affected area residents and the city council, in 1 9 8 3, was to taped, p If that is true, the Council members need only listen to that tape to know how the residents of the area feel. Some of the residents of 1983 have moved and some new people have moved in. However, the consensus of the present neighbors is the same as it was in 198 3 . In con elusion, my voice says to leave the proposed development of those 3 1 acres to Limited Commercial Service, 61 Attachment 14 CITY OF la � � gee D LEWOOD. 1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD9 MINNESOTA 55109 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 612-770-40560 October 1091988 NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY Joseph Zappa. et al 2522 Flandrau St. St. Paul, MN 55109 This surve is to g et y our opinion on an application the Cit has received to develop propert in y our nei The application is for an amendment to the Cit s Comprehensive Plan, Planned Unit Development and Desi Review of 426 apartments on Gervais Avenue. The current zonin and Cit plan limits the site to office uses. (See enclosed map ) The applicant is BBY Partnership, Your opinion is needed to assist the Cit staff and Plannin Commission in preparin a recommendation to the Cit Council. Once this surve is completed, you will be notified of an public hea Please indicate y our opinion and comments below and return onl this cover letter and an attachments on which y ou have written), to me in the en c losed posta envelope b October 20, 1988. If y ou would like further information, please call me at 7704560 between 8:00 A.M. and 5:K P.M. Thank y ou for y our comments. The will be g iven careful consideration. lj G FF OLSON EO AICP DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GO/nim Enclosures I am in favor of this proposal because I have no comment. I o ject to this prop sal be use Fi If y ou object, describe below or draw on t4?e" map an chan that would make this pro acceptable. If no chan would make it acceptable. how should this .prope . r1t be developed? (Please use reverse side if more room is needed) Attachmept 15 (Pro Gervais Apartments) 62 �� or oft 111111111Z 14 e o n dP cil dl lot It exe op r. L 7 Ao4-C4 63 11,12 lax WWI � � , x°71 ,.eP � u . oc-o AoV- L�!Pl000�r Oor- Al 11 11,1 1 1 1 4w tAolool J 411jj Cj jjjjlL4A�- i we 64 e 000 j �, ek- 00 Oro %�- 6-01. 5 er f J7 �- ) 41 Le ' 000-00 Z .,000ue A� ole %2plf—a� t4l"" IL 4, 'TR, %.�. -�. l2/✓i.- �..�'i\ `�_ � .C,c L4,.`F�- �+ ��2Y `'-�{" - ./���a!�e— .�.._c. -�, �i i i i f 3; i r �j ti i) ij I { II tl • 1 ell will f ..............__�_ 1 . w � i i. f- S s� 66 f� . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT WHEREAS, B B Y Partnership has init,iated an amendment to the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan to change land use designation from limited service commercial (LSC) to high density residential (Rh) for the following described property: ' Lot 5, Block 1, Mao1eridge Mall; and the east half and west half of Lot 1, E. G. Rogers' Garden Lots; and Lot 2, except the south 300 feet thereof E. G. Rogers' Garden Lots WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. This plan amendment was initiated by B B Y Partnership, 2. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on , 1988 to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said plan amendment be 3. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on 1 1988. The Council considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the following plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: a. This site is well -suited for apartment use and is consistent with the City's policies for the location of high density residential. (1) This site would be a transitional land use between low density residential and commercial /industrial uses. ' (2) It would be compatible with City policy to preserve the site's significant natural features. (3) It is located adjacent to a collector street, church and shopping, and is within walking distance of Four Seasons Park. b. The City's Housing and Redevelopment Authority has found this project is consistent with the City's housing policies that encourage a diversity of housing t The propos*al also addresses some of the 67 Attachment 16 concerns that have been expressed in the HRA'js recent annual reports. For example, this project would: (1) replace the three-bedroom rental units that were lost when the McKnight Townhouse development converted to owner-occupied units a fsw years ago, (2) replace some ' of the planned RH,' Residential High Density acreage ` that has been designated for other uses in recent years, (3) provide at least 74 of the 106 additional housing opportunities needed to comply with the City's 1980 to 1990 modest-cost housing goal and (4) provide some upper-income family rental units. C, This project would have no adverse effect on surrounding properties: ` (1) The apartments would be screened and ' buffered from the single-family homes to the northwest by steep slopes, and existing land proposed vegetation. (2) Studies show that there will be no adverse effect on property values attributable to this project. (3) There would be no traffic from this project through residential streets. d A 400 000 f t office development which is . , square- oo ce allowed under the existing zoning and land use plan for the site, would generate two to three times more traffic during the P.M. peak hour and about 65 percent more average daily traffic than the proposed multi- family housing development. This would create congestion with the turning lanes at White Bear Avenue and Gervais Avenue. e. This site was designated for RH use from 1973- 1983. The Planning Commission recommended approval of a 350-unit apartment project in 1977 and the City Council gave concept approval to an elderly housing project in 1983. Adopted this day of , 19880 ' Seconded b Ayes-- -CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the Cit Council of the Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota was dul called and held in the council chambers in said cit on the da of 1988 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, B B Y Partnership initiated a conditional use permit for a planned unit development multi-famil housing in a district located at Gervais Avenue in Maplewood, Minnesota, which facilit is proposed to accommodate a 426-unit apartment development with recreation building, activities building, cabana building and da center at the following described propert Lot 5, BI ock 1 1 Map eridge Mal I ; and the east hal f and west half of Lot 1, E. Go Rogers' Garden Lots and Lot 2, except the south 300 feet ther E. Go Rogers' Garden Lots WHEREAS, the procedural histor of this conditional use permit is as +01 laws: is This conditional use permit was reviewed b the Maplewood Planning Commission on November 21, 1988. The Planning Commission recommended to the Cit Council that said permit be 2a The Maplewood Cit Council held a public hearing on 198 Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunit to be heard and present written -statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the Cit staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT - RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL THAT the above-described conditional use permit is approved for a multi- famil housing planned unit development on the basis of the following findings of fact: i. The use is in conformit with the Cit comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2o The establishment or maintenance of the use will not be detrimental to the public health, safet or general welfare. (It wil I W Attachment 17 in fact, generate 1ess traxffic than the use for which it is presently guided.) ' 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to he compatible with the character of that zoning district. The planned unit development conditional use permit guarantees that development will take place in conformance with the approved plans and attached conditions.) 4. The use would not depreciate property values. (Studies have shown that high-quality moulti-family rental apartments do not depreciate adjacent single-family homes. Refer to the memos on pages 42 and 58.) 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noise or general unsightliness. (Noise levels will be within acceptable standards established by MPCA. Lighting from parking lot facilities will be shielded and directed downward. Existing topography plus proposed berming and landscaping will minimize views from neighboring residences northwesterly of the site.) 6. The use will generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. c. rhe majority of traffic produced from the project will exit to White Bear Avenue. Traffic studies at the intersection of Gervais and White Bear Avenues indicate that it will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service one year after completion of the development. There will be no traffic on local streets.) 7. The use will be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. (Adequate utilities are available for the proposed development. School needs are under study by the school district to resolve deficiencies.) 81 The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. (There are no requests for tax increment financing assistance or for revenue bonds. If any public improvements to roadways or sewer facilities are required, the developer will be assessed his fair share.) 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. (Two on-site wetlands are preserved by the development, as well as slope and tree preservation along the northerly perimeter of the site.) 10. Based on the environmental assessment worksheet prepared for this project, the use would not have the potential for significant adverse environmental effects. An environmental impact statement would, therefore, not be required. 70 Approval is subject to the following conditions: I in Adherence to the site plan and conditions approved b the communit design review board. Future changes to the site plan ma be approved b the board, 2a All uses shall conform with the R-3 zoning district re . 3,s Noise levels shall not exceed PCA standard . s at an residential propert line, 4a No outdoor storage of recreational vehicles, boats or trailers, Adopted this da of 198 Seconded b A STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY SS. CITY OF MAP LEWOOD 1, the undersigned, being the dul q ualified and appointed clerk of the Cit of Map lewood Minnesota, do hereb certif that I have carefull compared the attached and -foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the Cit of Maplewood, held on the da of 9 198 . with the original on f i I e in my of f ice and the same is a full, true and complete transcript insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permit, Witness m hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the cit this da of 198 Cit Cl erk City of Maplewood 71 12 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency November, 30, 19 8 8 Mr. Geoffrey Olson Planning Director 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr, Olson: Re: Maple Multifamily Housing, Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) The EAW on the referenced project has been reviewed by staff of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). While the preparation of an environmental impact statement on a project of this magnitude does not appear warranted, we believe that the following water quality concerns should receive further attention concerning the need for additional mitigation of environmental effects, prior to the granting of permits or approvals for the project. �sa A comprehensive plan amendment will be required for the project to change the project site designation from a Limited Service Commercial (LSC) land use to a High - Density Residential (Rh) land use designation. Planned Unit Developments (PUD) , which include apartment projects involving more than one Wilding, are conditional uses in the LSC district. Approval of a PUD conditional use permit is being pursued by the developer for the project. The staff is concerned about the high density of the apartment units being proposed and the correspondingly high percentage (46 percent) of impervious surface associated with the project. Our staff recommends a reduction in the unit density of the project prior to City approval including a reduction in impervious surface area to within a range of 25 percent to 35 percent, which is more typical of suburban multifamily or single family residential developments that the MPCA staff has reviewed in recent past. The staff is also concerned that-specific design characteristics for the storm water detention basins are not provided in the EAW. It appears that a substantial freeboard would be required for these basins to meet the projected runoff rates. In addition, it appears that sufficient attention may not have been given to water quality protection in the design of the project. For example, we would recommend that storm water not be discharged directly to the Department of Natural Resources protected water 62 -150, a type 3 wetland. Instead, additional detention capability should be constructed on site to provide greater protection against sedimentation from soil erosion due to construction and attendant water quality impacts. Phone: 520 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Regional Offices • Duluth /Brainerd /Detroit Lakes /Marshall /Rochester Equal Opportunity Employer Mr. Geoffrey Olson Page Two At page 18 of the EM it is stated that basins 3 and 4 are not Minnesota protected waters and, thus, fall within the permitting jurisdiction of the United States Army Corps of Engineers nationwide permit. This is not necessarily the case. The EM should have stated what type of nationwide permit is required for the project. Please contact Louis Flynn at 612/297 -3364, regarding any MPCA requirement for 401 Certification of the project. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. If you have any questions regarding these comments please contact Marlene Voita of my staff at 612/296 -72750 Sincerely, Clifford T. Anderson Director Office of Planning and Review CTA/MV: mf 1 cc: Mr. Gregg Downing, Minnesota Environmental Quality Board .Mr. Louis Flynn, MPCA, Division of Water Quality Maplewood Housing and Redevelopment Authority Minutes 11-15-88 B. Gervais Avenue Apartment Development The Bevel oper"s attorne summarized this -proposal. It was explained that no financial assistance would be re from the Cit The project will consist of 426 units (74 one bedroom, 233 two bedroom and 119 three bedroom units)" The rents would range from $550 to $630. for the one bedroom units up to $750 to $830 for the three bedroom unitso The development would also c a variet of- recreational - oriented'amenitiese 0 Staff pointed out that the project is consistent with the policies in the housing and land use location of multiple.-dwelling within the housing policies that state that encourage development that increases housing st amenities and price the communit pl an that govern the the communit and with the cit should the diversif of ranges available within Comm i ss i oner * Carl son moved and Commissioner Connell seconded-that the HRA recommend that council find that the Gervais Avenue housing project is consistent with the Cit housing policies that encourage diversit of housing t The proposal also addresses some of the concerns that have 'been expressed in the HRA's recent annual reports. For example, this project. would : 1) replace the three bedroom rental units* that were lost when the McV%nicjht Townhouse development converted to owner-occupied units a few y ears ago, 2) replace some of the planned Rh, rLmsi dent ial high densit acreage that has been designated -f or other uses in recent y ears., 3) provide at I east 74 of the 106 additional housing opportunities needed to compl with the Cit 1980 to 1990 modest-cost housing goal and 4) provide some upper-income famil rental units. teazel Ridge contains some upper inco units but Hazel Ridge is restricted to older adult residents.) Motion carried, a all with Commissioner S chmit abstaining. C. Truth -In- Housing Code Staff explained that the Cit Council had asked the HRA to n 7 ti i i- h— 1 —1-1 r11 1 r- 1 rl r., rpview the merits nf Adnntinn Planning Commission Minutes 11-21-88 +r�Ramsey C to determine if improvements *illbe needed at the i��� �� Afton Roads intersection ' prior �� ����.�.����~� ������tion^ Commissionm»r yzs��Axdah1v Ayers, ' ' �Barpettv Cardinal, Dempsey, Fischer, Larson, Sigmundik don Commissioner Lars n moved he Planning Commission Lars he P' ann sessment work-sheet be recommend ~. /enro - Commission na1 second dahl�, Ayers, 19 Barret Cardinal , ^� empsey , Fischer , ` �� - arson v Sigmundi B. Gervais Avenue (Maplewood Multifamily Housing) Plan Amendment PUD Secretary Ol son presented the staf report a Linda Fischer, representing BBY Partnership, gave a presentation. Also present was Ken Belgard, Harry Yaffe, representatives of BBY Partnership; Scott England and James Cooperman, representing the architect for the ti the landscape -architect; project; Gene Ernst, represen ng e Dick Schabert, representing the surveyors and civil engineers; Chuck Rykirk, representing the traffic engineers; and Rom Peterson, who prepared the environmental assessment worksheet. A commissioner asked if the developer had considered underground parking~ Ms. Fischer said that the architect's experience was that garages would meet all needs of the residents. %}onald Larson, 2554 Bittersweet Lane, said he didn't believe 3M personnel would be renting units in this complex, as they already have sufficient units rented at c� �cation/ which are closer to the 3M offixces. Bill Burns, 2527 Bittersweet Lane, read a signed petition from surrounding property owners who are objecting to this project's development, asking that this proposed development not be approved. Joe Zappa 2522 Flandrau said this proposed development Planning Commission Minutes 11-21-88 . . . l � t ���l� �� ���a Mr. will p���� ��o ��n� people � o� ~ ^ Zappa also cited the Metropolitan Council's information regarding over-building of multiple housing in some areas~ Mr" Zappa referred to the findings require d f or a conditional use permit for «* planned unit development and cited his objections. Judy Burns, 2527 Bittersweet Lane, said she received information from the Metropolitan Council stating the v acan c y rates for the metropolitan area have risen steadily over the past few years and are at their highest level at present and she indicated this would create Several other peopl"e communicated objections to this development concerning assessments for sewer and roads, flooding in the area, decrease in property 'values, and additional traffic problemns. In response to e question by a commissioner, the applicants explained their plans for buffering or berming on the west side xof the site. . Commissioner Cardinal moved the Planning Commission recommend: 1. Denial of the resolution which amends the land use e^ The developer does not consider Mr. Cavanaugh's property to the west. b^ The ,jeaveloper has not shown the need for the devel of rental property on this sitCelo c. Traffic problems would be created on Highway 360 d. The developer has not shown a phasing plan for the gradual development of the property. Commissioner Dempsey seconded Ayes--Axdahl , Cardinal , Dempsey, Barrett Abetentiuns--Larson, Sigmundik Commissioner Cardinal mowed the Planning Commission recommend denial of the resolution which approves a Planning Commission Minutes 11-21-88 conditional use permit for one y ear for this project, based on the reasons for the denial of the plan amendment. Commissioner Dempse seconded A dahl s Cardinal Dempse 9 Larson Sigmundik 9 Barrett Na Commissioner Fischer had t o leave during the discussion and did not votes VI VISIT R PRESENTATIONS R viis COMMUNI ATIONS VIII. NEW BUSINESS A Street \aand Alle Vacations: Walter Street Associate Pla ner Randall Johnson /esented the staff report. A representativ said the would soon as possible Public Work:s Ken Avenue needed to done. of the appl ican First State Bank of HU90 1 ik.* e o rder have t vacation documents +i1ed as n e P'ic n t to I rder the propert Directo of to .11 r ider rep d that the drivewa to 10?6 Frost I u b. reconst a be+ ore the + i 1 i ng coal d be Commissioner A mo' Planning Commission recommend: Approval of the r olution to vacate Walter Street between Frost and Fenton AAnues. Approval is on the basis thatwo a. The stree is n t. needed for area tra++ic c i r c u 1 &..� = ons b Constr ction of t street solel to provide direct stree access to 1- 6 Frost Avenue would re City part* i p at i on in t costs and, ther--e+ ore , WOUld not be i the - publ ic int rest g iven that timel eme genc veh i c l e acc ss can be guaranteed over an existing drivewa C is dwelling was built bef ore Maplewood was ncorporated. The pres nt drivewa accesses have- been used without pub ic safet incident over the years. Communit Design Review Board Minutes 11-29-88 -a Trees along the north propert I in f rom the t o o fro f the site to the west line f e Cub Foods 0 t Tre of t y e 0 b u-t 'il %i n g b to eees al ong the south side of he southerl t ruck: uc�c I trance for a distance of 601 f eet east of the +ro'rxt*lot line. 19s Al . 1 green areas shall be sodd , except for those areas behind Cu Foods and east o th site which shall be sod or seeds 19. All re landscape ar as shall be continually and properly ma i nt ineds 20. All re p ant ma rials that die shall be replaced b the owne wit n one y ears 21. Re+lectorized st igns and two handicap parking signs shall be provide 22. All public bout ar that is disturbed due to this construction shall res red and resoddeds 23. The dock are on the s uth side of the building shall be screened from Rice treet in a manner acceptable to the Review Bo rd. 24 . The appl i ant shat I prov de a. monetary guarantee in a form accept b e to staff in the amount of 150% of the estimated cc t of an site impr vements that are not completed b occupanc 25. Appr al of plans b the Com unit Design Review Board doe not constitute approval of a building permits 26. Al fuel pumps shall be toward he rear of the site. Board. . Member Anitzberger seconded A Be Plan Review - Maplewood Housing Apa t men ts Gervais Avenue Linda Fischer, representing BBY Partnershipq said the i of the conditions of applicant was in agreement with all the staff recommendation. Ms. Fischer did ask for clari+ication on the recommendati ' ons concerning the public trail easement and the bus stop and shelters Board Member Deans moved approval of p.lans -date-stamped November. 18 , 1988, subject to the following conditions: Community-Design Review Board 5- Minutes 11-29'88 ` 1. Aoprowal o+ mx conditional use permit and mu I and use plan amendment by the City Council 2. All trash dumpsters shal stored in screening enclms°res with a 100% opaque wooden gate and shal1 be a color and material compatible with the building. Enclosures shall be protected by concrete-filled steel posts, or'the equivalent, anchored in the ground at the +ront corners o+ the structure. If the enclosure is maeonry the protective posts may be omitted. The design and appearance of these enclosures shall be subject to staff aapproval. 3. Any exterior building or roof-top equipment shall be decoratively screened and hidden from view. 4. An erosion control plan, acceptable to the City Engineer, shall b e submitted prior to the issuance of a grading permit for erosion control during construction. 5. Parking areas shall be striped and all bituminous areas shall have continuous concrete curbing. Parking lots shall be kept in a continual state of repair. ` 6. If construction has not begun within 18 months of approval, board review shall be repeated. app , ^ 7. Site security lighting shall be provided and shall be directed or shielded so not to cause emY undue glare onto adjacent properties or roadwa 8. If any adjacent property is disturbed or property irons removed due to construction of the site, that property shall be restored and irons replaced by the applicant. . 90 The landscape plan shall be revised asfollows: a^ The area +rom the north end of the day care _ building's play yard +ence to the midpoint «zf the r. v, garage shall be planted heavily with evergreen trees" b` All development landscaping shall have an underground lawn sprinkling system provided" . . Existing trees at the north end o+ the site shall be protected during construction by snow fencing" 10. Prior to obtaining ax building permit, the applicant Communit Design Review Board - 6 - MinUtes 11-29-88 shat I verif in writing that at I east one percent of the construction cost wil I be spent o n the planting of trees. 11. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the applicant shall provide staff with a tentative schedule for the construction or installation of all. common-ground amenities (landscaping, pla areas, pathwa recreational buildings, etc.) so there will be a clear understanding as to when completion is expected. All screening along the north and west lot lines shall be completed within the first y ear of constructions 12. All re landscape areas shall be continually and properl maintaineds 1.3. All re plant materials that die shal.1 be replaced b the owner within one y ears 14. Re+lectori-azved stop signs shall be provided at the e%,.,,its. Handicap park- ing signs shall be provided at all handicap spaceso The Efirector of Public Safet shall approve internal directional and traffic safet signs: within this developments 15. Ali . pub lic bOUlevard that is disturbed due to this. construction shall be restored and resoddedif 1.6. Final grading, drainage and utilit plans shall be approved by .the Cit Engineer prior to isst-ting a buildin�;- permit Am 1.7. Sanitar sewer service for the project shal 1 be provided b a pump station dischar g 4 L ng to Manhol e 22 in District 27 at the southwest corner of the site. The pump station wil I be built and maintained b the developers 18, The developer shall construct a two-inch-thick bit UMinous overla on Gervais Avenue from K%ennard to F i a -Az I elwood. Construct ion to be coordinated with the Cit Engineers 19. Internal paths for the western group of apartment buildings, as well as an internal hard surface pathwa s for Buildings .7 8 9 and 10, shat I be constructed within one y ear of 70% occupanc Cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit representing 150% of project cost 4or the pathwa shall be submitted to the Cit prior to issuance of the first building permits 20. The site plan shall be revised to provide at least communit Design Review Board Minutes 11-29-88 15 feet of separation between apartment buildings and parking spacess 21 . identification signage is, not part of this approval Sign proposals shall be approved b staff 9 unless Design Review Board or Cit Council approval is re 22. The bituminous trail along Gervais Avenue shall be placed within the right-of-way to allow public use of this trail from the westerl Rainbow Foods drivewa to the applicant's westerl lot lin This pedestrian-way shall be constructed so that it blends into all drivewa grades* 23. A public trail easement shall be provided between the northwest corner of the site to the open space propert and to Gervais Avenueq subject to staff approvals 24. All utilities, such as outdoor meters ,"shall be screene,; from e views 25. A paved bus stop and shelter shall be provided along Gervais Avenue. The design, location and identification signage of this bus stop shall be subject to staf f approval. 26. The minimum habitable floor area for each dwelling shat I meet the re as St ipUl ated b Ord inancLn Subsection 36-122 (b)s 27. Each unit shall have 120 cubic feet of miscellaneous storage space provided in addition to normal closet space. 28a A si..xt--foot-tal 1 80% opa decorative wood fence shall be installed along the west side of the pla area north of the da care buildings 29. The appl icant -shat I provide a monetar guarantee in a form acceptable to staff in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of an site improvements that are not completed b occupanc 30. Brick will be added to all apartment buildings at the rear elevation at one central section subject to review and approval b staff . Board Member Erickson seconded Ayes--all ./ ' ' MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: DATE: City Manager Associate Planner-Johnson Street and Alley Vacation's Walter Street and Alley to the East First Bank of Hugo Edith Hagstrom and William Linton December 1, 1988 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Endorsed________ Modif�e�__-____ Bejected______~_ The applicant is requesting the vacation of the part of Walter Street, south of Frost Avenue, that abuts the east boundary of their property. Staff is including the vacation of the remainder of Walter Street, south to Fenton Avenue, and the vacation of the alley right-of-way, between Frost and Fenton Avenues east of 1096 Frost Avenue. BACKGROUND 1. On January 28, 1985, Council denied the requested street vacation. Opposition to the vacation came primarily from the residents along Phalen Place who believed that Walter Street was needed to divert traffic from their street. The City engineer has completed a traffic analysis for this area and has found that the traffic on Phalen Place is well within design specifications for a local street. 2. On November 28, the City Council tabled a decision on ordering the construction of Walter Street until this vacation application was heard on December 12. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL Chapter 412.851 of state law states that "Council may, by resolution, vacate any street or alley...if it appears in the interest of the public to do so..." DISCUSSION Walter Street should not be constructed for traffic reasons. One of the reasons given previously for constructing Walter Street was to reduce the traffic on Phalen Place. The volume of traffic on Phalen Place is well within the capacity of the street. The current average daily traffic (ADT) is 494. 1,000 ADT is considered the upper limit for a local street~ / The primary reason for constructing Walter Street would be to �ov�de one addi venue and tional lot each for 1889 Walt�r Streetv 1091096 pros� ^ - A e an the bank property at the southwest corner of Walter Street and Frost Avenue. An additional lot at 1889 would require the vacation of Fenton Avenue. The City had previously denied this vacation. An additional lot at 1096 Frost Avenue would require moving the existing house. The bank does not have a preference, but simply wants a decision. Since there is at least one and maybe two property owners who wo ld like the street to go in to develop lots, the City should d table th order the street an a e e treet vacation until the s assessment hearing is held. If the property owners appeal the assessment, the project should be dropped and the street vacatedu Recommendation Table the vacation until after the assessment hearing is held. � __ REFERENCE SITE DESCRIPTION Area of 1 096 Frost Avenue: 160 feet of frontage X 120 feet or 19,200 square feet. The house is located in the middle of the lots If the house were to be removed or relocated, enough frontage and area would exist to subdivide the lot into two parcels, provided Walter Street would be constructed. Existing land uses 1 096 Frost Avenue: single dwelling and detached garage. Two gravel driveways access this property -- -one over the alley right-of-way and one within the Walter Street right-of-way. Walter Street: unimproved 60- foot- -wide right-of-way. Sanitary sewer and storm sewer are located within the right-of-way. An easement needs to be kept, if the street is vacated. Alley: unimproved 20-feet wide. Serves as a secondary access for 1096 Frost Avenue. A garage may be encroaching. on it east of 1 096 Frost Avenue, NSF' power p o l es are a l s o located w i t h i n this right-of-way. An easement needs to be retained for^ these utilities. SURROUNDING LAND USES Walter Street North: Frost Avenue Fast.: Three single- - dwelling properties, two of which have front- age on Frost or Fenton Avenue. South: Fenton Avenue. Across the street are single dwellings. West: The applicant's undeveloped property which has 250 feet of frontage on this right-of-way, Al l ey North: Frost Avenue East: Four s i ng l e --dwel l i ng propert i es , none of wh i ch rel y on this al l ey for access South: Fenton Avenue West: Three single-dwelling properties including 1 096 Frost Avenue. 3 PLANNING 1 Land use plan designation: RL residential I ow density 2. Zoning: R-1, single dwelling PUBLIC WORKS 1. The dwlelling at 1096 Frost Avenue is not served b Cit water. An easement should be retained within the vacated alle right-of-wa to insure that this propert can hook up in the future, if the propert owner wishes to do so. The shortest route to the main in Frost Avenue would be through the alle The alle route would also avoid having to tear up the drivewa to extend water. There is no Cit code that re a propert to be served b Cit water, unl6ss new streets are being constructed through a plate 2n If the right-o+-wa is retained, the street- should be constructed to eliminate an unnecessar liabilit for an injur that could occur on this propert as well as, to improve the aesthetics of the areas mb/riwal.ter2 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Propert Line/ Zoning Map 301 Area Development Concept (With Walter Street) 4. Area Development Concept (Walter Street Vacated) 5. Excerpt from Walter Street Feasibility Report 6. Resolution (Street Vacation) 7 s Resolution (Alle Vacation) .. .. ... .., ... ... .. ._ ,... .. .. ,. r. .Y=.v' "!� w.r - ..... a:, 4^;�•,... «. ;. s .'.u�:,s+`�.,.. :Y.� ,s.�?:..., .c. +.` +µ.w•. Nle �.s�. r ..t'_i .� _....;ri.. ..... .. 'sr.,z. +:1 +, .` � 5 ; - ' S'_ay.��..�x�d...a..��.i:. ., ...,. K+.:, = 1 • w C RD C 1 23 y J PALM C H H E H- • Y CR r,• P W J W O = N � R G� 4 W EMONT AV p MONK AV o (1) CON NOR Av ° a� AV o 22 W e �� y z SEX H 0 AN T AV 60 P GERVAIS AV v G Ai No ...... v GRANOVIEW AV Z PKWY °C Y L a� VIKING OR _� COP E cT eoPE Av Knuckle Head Lake covE F- ~ W MONSON Keller loke LARK AV 1- RK co c RD "B" a LAI I g 28 o LELAND RD o AND- HU ac AV Gv � _ IY Y < JUNCT T ' CO 0 Aw ar £ AV 4 ��O (1) CHAMBERS ST H P (I 'f'E AV ao ELORI00 AV A ` SKI !1► s .ON.- R ECREAT /pAr J AV ILLMAN AV > >' RRIS �l NW o Q. N R4SEW000 LA AH Q S AV 26 fRA <<.,,..,..... '- MOST �- 28 OWN )AJ I ~ r > 60 2T W FE ON AV < R AV SU `. S2 J ; g FRI BIf AV 0 W .. Z. , RIPLEY ♦" _ < a m Y 0 _ � Z Z /" +�� W V ��/ W < 2T ROU�d = i 11.x// _ � A NV LAX - 4 30 � \� � I I \ .� 11 PA UL 62 s4 sR LOCATION MAP 60 LJ N 5 Attachment 1 LEASEo To VILLAGE OF {" A EwooD M. on �Y =,,A IMP awe alj� ob L jQ!r ITO fm I • - • •' '� Go 11 10 It + 1 IU 1"70 10 ..(L • Cz 14 ( ?`l� f f 4 7 �o�. 14 14 + J, 7 v�) S :::... 0 IG ,S .•:off•' , tG 5 o i 1 ' / a t - L - , 9 �d Q- t?ot� btss �o ,4 -- — — �( o• o♦' o 1 , 'i o 1 to 1 1 L g ga t tic \2 4e GO v '4? NNEEMENNAVI x}410 _ to loop ti 1—, --- • 0 IL ''(� 9 • �GG� OV 1 T ; 6s) 14 7 T 14 0 1 A— -- 1L rh PL r. Tj • to 1 1 IG + o �i• IG N (4t.} 5 1 S J ♦ I I • ,4 S apt . ' •�8 5 17 '�83� 0 1 — _. w et I 1 s 84. 19 t ' W sLy9 -- --- o crLG 0 - •-� J ��� bS G� .45•►+c. t o 1 O Zp t �'." r 2A 1 1 l4"� GC 1 3o r ej 0 "In 4a I 30 0 Z 1 {ilk , J Q G Z . ' 2 1 I IS 2 t • �• .Dt•� • 04 •3 2 1 W �Sn '1 gt�. 00 3 I 14 1 9 _ _ -- — — t �l�'� a "� 4 Q 13 = a 1 1n 9e.� • 0 -- — -- -- --` t , GOR D ��' 1 CSC 5 1 141.4 COG 1.4 y (a) cc 1 • { 31) 3 L z �'' I I : . ` 1 t (71) G q � � o Z • 3 sa'c j � � dw G 3 � 2 3 4 <�� � 4.s1 GO � '� 7 1 Ip a ? E 4. cs> -- — --' -�- -- ISO ia& a 1 9 Go b R�RT of a24 0 + � � �o rx � 2 O ♦4 Z �RIPLEY AVE I , 9 LOOKOUT — — vto Ian to PARK 40 o — — -- o 3 ' 1 2O C j --- -- v o � tor Q� O PIP ; i 9 t:) . °. 4( I . 1 of l ' s ` + Z ♦ 2 i � II 100 _.- - -- 'f %S1 4 -- a aAw PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 6 Requested by Applicant licant Proposed by City Staff Attachment 2 ' Q N KELLER GOLF COURSE Frost Avenue _ 2W I f Fenton Avenue quo. mmm� — — • - -- Note: 1096 Frost cannot � be subdivided into Undeveloped be wide lots a unless the house is 3 ,relocated and the alley is vacated. AREA DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT (If Walter Street were to be constructed) N 7 Attachment 3 KELLER GOLF COURSE Frost Av enue 20' 90 1100 Ch C) M 10 0� _ Lo . o U �' i z ,Q. < o � +' L a 2 i 0 x LU - I0 -4 co Q r r m I Ffu t 2 . 1 m � . 1 20.0 1050 13�� f Q N r t 1101 Undeveloped I 3081 - - - - -- 120.0 160 , v 1B Fenton Avenue o _ _ _ f rI. CL - ar' Ho and g arage `10 - � ou 09' g g � t8 - front on Walter Street, not the alley. The Undeveloped ` principal access should co continue to be from the 3 west. (Walter Street or • a drive over the City's utility easement. AREA DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT (Proposed) LJ N Attachment 4 8 WALTER STREET PROJECT 84-14 INTRODUCTION This report i's an amendment to the original feasibil ity report dated December 3, 1984. The original feasibility report p wp - resent/ d costs and assessment data for two options. The options truction are a standard design, 3 for con�2-foot wide, nine ton road with concrete curb and gutter or a reduced design standard (e.g. no curb an� gutter� str�et ~ A copy of the original feasibi l it\/ 'report is reproduced as an append ix . The concl us of the original report are still val id with the revision of costs to account for inflation. Revised cost data is presented later in this report. TRAFFIC A significant part of the proposed iustification for the construction of Walter Street from Fenton Avenue to Frost Avenue was intended to relieve perceived traffic congestion on Phalen - Pl ace. In December 1984 the city engineer reported to the co cil on traffic flow pat�erns in th*� neighborhood. A cop Y c� tt-�staff report is included as an appendix. In 1984, traffic ' Counts �uere made which showed 576 aver, dail� traffic (ADT) on -- south of F t A A rate of 1 000 ADT �s Phale� Place sou ros Avenue. , widely accepted as the upper limit of traffic that a local street can adequate]y handle~ Refer to the following table of functional classification system characteri�ation for roadways for additional information on characteristics of local roadways in comparison tn» h igher clsssifications. The 576 ADT was well Within the adequate range of traffic for a local street classification. This suggests that there is not actuc a traffic volume problem on Phalen Place. Howevery due to the reconstruction of Frost Avenue at the t'me of the traffic stuov in 1984, there was question as to the applicability of the date recorded at that time. A new traffic count study was done between August 1 and August 3 1988. The resu1ts are shown on the treffic count fic.iure in comparisnr with the-traffic counts determined In tne 1.984 t��ff1c study. It is seen that traffic volumes are comparable to those determined during 1984. In fact, the traffic on Phalen Pl�ac�� actually decreased to 494 ADT from 576 ADT recorded in 19840 There is not oa traffic volume problem on Phalen Place. Furthermore, as noted in the December 3 1984 memorandum from the city engineer it is questionable whether Walter Street if built as proposed would divert any traffic away from.Phalen Place. lmprovement of neicjhborhood trm+fic distribution is not an appropriate Justification for the construction of Walter Street~ � Attachment 5 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the cit Council of the Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota was dul called and held in the Council Chambers in said Cit on the da of 10 1988, at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, First Bank of Hugo and the Cit of Maplewood initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the +ollowing-described propert Walter Street between Frost and Fenton Avenues in Kavanagh and Dawson 's Addition, Section 16, Township 29 Range 22. WHEREAS, the procedural histor of this vacation is as follows: in This vacation was reviewed b the Planning Commission on November 21 1988, The Planning Commission recommended to the Cit Council that this vacation be a 2n The Cit Council held a public hearing on It 1988 to consider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pur to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunit to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the cit staff and Planning Commissions WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above-described street right-o+- wa , public interest in the propert will accrue to the following- described abutting properties: Lots One through Ten, Block Four and Lots Eleven through Twent Block Three, Kavanagh and Dawsonts Addition to Gladstone Section 16, Township 29, Range 220 .NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED b the Maplewood Cit Council that it is in the public interest to grant the above-described vacation on the basis of the following findings of facts in This street is not needed for area traffic circulations 2w Construction of the street solel to provide direct street access to 1096 Frost Avenue would r Cit participation in the costs and, therefore, would not be in the public interest, given that timel emergenc vehicle access can be guaranteed over an existing drivewa 3s This dwelling was built before Maple was incorporateds The present drivewa accesses have been used without public safet incident over the years . 10 Attachment 6 Approval is subject to the retention of : (1) a util it easement described as +ol I ows: Ten feet west of the center I ine , together with ten. feet east of the center I ine from Fenton Avenue north to the westerl e., tension of the North I ine of Lot 16, Block Three, Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition to Gladstone and over all of the east half of the vacated right-o+-wa west between Frost Avenue and the westerl extension of the North line of said Lot 16. (2) a private drivewa easement over the East 30 feet of Walter Street from Frost Avenue to the westerl extension of the North line of Lot 14, Block 3, Kavanagh and Dawson 's Addition t 109 Frost Avenue)u Adopted this da of 1988a Seconded b A STATE* OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY SS CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersigned, being the dul q ualified and appointed Clerk of the Cit of Maplewood Minnesota, do hereb certif that I have carefull compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the Cit of Map lewood held on the da of 1 1988 with the original on file in m office and the same is a full true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to vacation of Walter Streets Witness m hand as such Cl erk and the corporate seal of the Cit this da of 1 19888 Cit Cl erk Cit of Maplewood Minnesota 11 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the Cit Council of the Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota was dul called and held in the Council Chambers in said Cit on the da of 1988, at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the Cit of Maplewood initiated proceedings to vacate the alle right-o+-wa in Block 3, Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition to Gladstone. WHEREAS, the p r ocedural histor of this vacation is as follows: in This vacation was reviewed b the Planning Commission an November 21, 1988. The Planning Commiss recommended to the Cit Council that this vacation be • 2,m The Cit Counc i I hel d a publ ic hea on November 28 9 1988 to consider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to I aw. Al I persons present at this hearing were given an opportunit to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the Cit staff and Planning Commissions WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above-described alle right-of-way, public interest in the propert will accrue to the +ollowing-described abutting properties: Lots 1-20 Block 3 Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition to Gladstone NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED b the Maplewood Cit Council that it is in the public interest to grant the above-described vacation on the basis of the following findings of + act : is It is not used as the primar access to an adjoining properties* 2 a It is the Cit policy to vacate obsolete alle right-o+-wa whenever possible to eliminate an Cit liabilit for personal injur that ma occur on the propert and to promote improved maintenance of the adjoining propertiess Approval is subject to retaining a utilit easement over the entire vacated right-o+-wa 12 Attachment 7 Adopted this da of 19886 Seconded b A STATE OF M I NNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY SSW CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, I, the undersigneds being the dul q ual if ied and appointed Clerk of the Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota do hereb certify that I have careful I y , compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the Cit of Maplewood, held on the da of 9 1988 with the original on file in m office and .the same is a full true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to vacation of this alle right-of-ways Witness m hand as such Cl erk and the corporate seal of the Cit this da of 1 19880 Cit Clerk Cit of Maplewood 9 Minnesota 13 4 4 Z ft Action b 'Counc Kridorsed -------- MEMORANDUM 144 th ' f fed , Re' ected. TO: Cit Manager Dat e FROM: Thomas Ekstrand--Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Termination. LOCATION: 1060 North Sterlin Street APPLICANT: Montessori Da Care Centers. Inc* OWNER: School District' No. 622 PROJECT: School and Da Care Center DATE;, December la, 1988 SUMMARY Introduction I This Montessori school and da care facilit is no lon in operation. The conditional use permit (CUP) should, therefore# be terminated* Background 101-25-82: The Cit Council g ranted the CUP for this facilit U-14-83: Council renewed the CUP for five y ears* Ordinance Requirements Su bsection 36-442 (f) and ( re The Council ma upon review, terminate the permit if approved conditions ma have been violated or the use is no lon in effect* the ( g ) In the event the Council in its review process decides to consider imposin additional conditions or termination of a conditional use permits the Cit Council shall hold at least one public hearin on that permit after a notice of the hearin has been published in the off icial newspaper at least ten .( 10) da before said hearin The Council shall also cause a notice to be mailed to each of the owners of propert within three hundred f if t ( 350) feet of the boundar 1 ines of the propert upon which such use has been established, which notices are to be mailed to the last known address of such owners at least ten (10) da before the date of the hearing* 0 Recommendation Adoption of the resolution on pa 5 terminatin the conditional use. permit ' for a, meant essori school and da care center at Beaver Lake Elementar School, 1060 North Sterlin Street. mb/da mem At achments: 1. Location Map 2. Propert Line/Zonin Map 3. Resolution 2 _ -' : ...- •. - � ...: . ; •. � . ,. •, <.. ... � ,� « ",.:a':s;t .. , i. .:t..s..... ^,;-,:,x�^...� ✓.n. _ . ,,. ..:a.:;:.a . �.aa- f�.'�`.�V.iW ... _D. C.�W�w..o��'.w4.rva:.Y::' • 'tl+...:.TS:.� .yK•.�i- .:.... .. � �,'3.e: .. - � . . .... J'.:. � •. .r n.. � � .. ...._ >.. -:ie'v _. n <t.•w,c.. .- vc -v .ache.. .. . ...r - .. ... E. MARYLA w — — 3i v ^`� ST p -4 E 69 61 .dearer MA t• AVE . Q 0 • •.i ..,,....�.....- a ::. CL .•. CASE 68 69 z r•�1i R V E S7 ER �- A AVL 32 � W -� �� Eel• d R AND AVE: " 32 ST. TTH jAv E. z E. 7 TM. AVE ; S • ac •USN 2 S 30 It 2 2 Mt R 21w V ;• Z , A VE. ac� z 212 AM = w ANA A 34 0 34 E, MARGARET AvE= • vs E STN AVE. W • < FREMO NT AVE •.3M Cr. Cr 29 _ - EONwAY ~ ►~. _ AVE SERVICE R0. 3 M 68 �� — •.: 120 J . � LOCATION MAP 3 N Attachment 1 .. f , zi ' �• r A RYLA KIE RD. 39 :. 1 ••. • • ..: IVY /r/E . . Q • 0 Q 68 Troiler Court (p r ivate ) � A VF E. MARYLA w — — 3i v ^`� ST p -4 E 69 61 .dearer MA t• AVE . Q 0 • •.i ..,,....�.....- a ::. CL .•. CASE 68 69 z r•�1i R V E S7 ER �- A AVL 32 � W -� �� Eel• d R AND AVE: " 32 ST. TTH jAv E. z E. 7 TM. AVE ; S • ac •USN 2 S 30 It 2 2 Mt R 21w V ;• Z , A VE. ac� z 212 AM = w ANA A 34 0 34 E, MARGARET AvE= • vs E STN AVE. W • < FREMO NT AVE •.3M Cr. Cr 29 _ - EONwAY ~ ►~. _ AVE SERVICE R0. 3 M 68 �� — •.: 120 J . � LOCATION MAP 3 N Attachment 1 I r i 3 • :4 1 I 3 9 2 H i� 1 0 IN in al t, Q I j • t .. 2 52 9 { F '' 2511 22 03- � b t � , .9.1.1 � � � ' 1 .. � � .! r. ,"• � C r j 41 0 4 L,"U 'I t � ~ A► O ' S T V T f � � ' � � .Sates. •'oOw... _ � - �U4� 1l 1t O / � � o a • ti o G v 1 15 t c 2 • 1 c ^ O C t' 1 r O �, .., ,, (r v elf r a 4 ...r, ?_L3.32 • � , � , 1 ,? - HA t AV •• - PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP a Attachment 2 • e ^ t w y ' N riST' Maple Oaks ' Playground Funeral Home 1 10 �1 1. tit) « -) 4k • � � 4 N Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council Chambers in said city on the 12th day of December. 1988 at 8; 50 p.m. The following members were present The following members were absent WHEREAS, the Montessori Academy initiated a conditional use permit to operate a day care facility at the following—described property: Plat of survey of a parcel of land in the southwest quarter of the.. northeast quarter of Section 25. Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey county. Minnesota described as; except the North 68 f eet of the South 288 f eet of the of the East 170 f eet and except the South. 2201 feet of the East 105 feet, the West 977.22 feet of the North 544.21 feet of said quarter quarter section. This property is also known as 1060 North Sterling Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS. the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: i. This conditional use permit was granted by the Maplewood City Council on October 25. 1982 and renewal for a five --year term on November 14, 1989; 20 This conditional use permit is no longer desired by the applicant since they have ceased this use at this location. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL THAT the above -- described conditional use permit be terminated. Adopted this day of 198811 Seconded by Ayes-- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY ? SS. 7 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 5 Attachment 3 I# the undersi bein the dul q ua l ied and appointed Clerk of the Cit of Map lewoodf Minnesotap, do hereb certif that I have careful compa, . red the attached and fore extract of minutes of a re meetin of the Cit of Maplewood, held on the da of 198 wl*th the ori on f ile in m of i and the same is a full# true and complete tr insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permit terminat ion. Witness m hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the cit this da of 0 19889 Cit Clerk City of Maplewood L�* 17' l I I AGENDA ITEM 1 .. Act by Counc MEMORANDUM - :odif i ec T O : C ity Manager" Rejected FROM: Assistant City En D ate SUBJECT: Walter Street, Frost Avenue to Fenton Avenue , Pro j ec t - 84-14 -- Pub l i c Hearin DATE: November 22, 1988 Enclosed is a fig from the March 2, 1985 public h ear i n g mailing list boob:: that i d e n t i f i e s the assessable front footage involved with the proposed projects It should be noted that assessment of the 1 20 F.F. of side lot fronta of Lot 18, 1 9.J amid 20 of Block: 3 Kavanagh Dawsons A d d i t i o n on the northeast corner of Walter Street right of wa and Fenton Avenue may riot be entirely sustainable.. Although this assessment would be in accord with the def acto assessment policy of the city as established by precedent, the recent experience with successful assessment objections for similar corner lots on Cope Avenue, Project 85- 26* raises the question of the validity of the proposed assessment for this parcel. An appraisal to resolve this questions has not been done at this point. It is possible that if the proi.ec.t is ordered, then the city may have to supply funds to supplement the recoverable assessment from this corner 1 otM i i i I A potential alternative to the construction of proposed Walter Street, which does not serve a p u b l i c purpose other than access to the existing residence at 1096 Frost Avenue, may be the up grading of the ex isting driveway to provide acceptable e mergency veh icl e access. It is estimated that the driveway ccYul d be upgraded to' provide acceptable emergency vehicle access by placement cif aggregate base material upon the e x i s t i n g driveway. This work: could be done by city maintenance forces at a cost of less than $1000 Transmitted herewith are copies of the public hearing mai l iri�j l i st . A resolution to order preparation of plans and spec ification is attached. jw Attachments F I r 4 &t sz s* ss r• 'o tit •�- >> `' vG �U t as 4 40 . o�v n. ' ro I f Ira or pJ -so to 191 1 QL AL ll0OFf ,5 ft� ,S w • Co w ..r• �� w Ip D /� �,�. L7 . 1 5 t • ' FENTON ' to I t I L Ir • I t �' � 'r; a,,.,� Mme• ..r�....� 1'� a '. L L • 14• t� tC r i I .... cc "IT ff T'•' g i ? t 'ln t • o ' o 1 , I 1 ....._'....� � .1 l" r - K mac, b ��• 4 13 F 0 r-ORD - An *0 • t► .�� t� E icy 4 a g z ' C,0 °RIPLEY l� q z Vol. — ------- — O l. O I- i J r.�. fto — •— r V t:' O �� . 4 ; 1 t9 d 4 IU 5 . � � 1 ♦ , � I `j w • '� �..�� ..ter ...��. ��.. 1 o • �. 1 , ' -- r ( IMP. 84 -14 Walter Street I Projected Assessment Frontage 3/8/85 "`r RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC Hl: -ARI 1�1t � WHEREAS, after due notice of pUb l i c heari on the construction of street and u t i l i t i e s on Walter Street, Frost Avenue to Fenton Avenue , City Project 84-14, a hearin on s a i d improvement in accordance with the notice dul y given w;xt:; du y hol d on November 28, 1988 , and the COU i l has heard aI I p ersons desiring to be heard on the matter and has ful l y considered ti same 1\10W, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. OF MAPL.EWOOD , MINNESOTA, as follows I That it is advisa e::pedient and necessary that the Ci of Maplewood construct street and art i l i t i eS o, n Walter St reet, Frost Avenue to Fenton Aven City Project 84-14, as described in the notice of hearing thereof, and orders the same t be m de $$ 2. The city engineer is designated engineer for this improvement an d is hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the mak- i n g of said imp rove men t . -, ' //. � /7 ==_` \ Action lb� � Counoilt \ \ v Endorsed__~~�,��� MEMORANDUM Modif l*ed__~.-~,—,=� ' Rej ected_....., Date TO: City Manager FROM: Director o+ Community Dev�elopcen� SUBJECT: Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit LOCATION: Larpenteur Avenue and Sylvan Street OWNER/APPLICANT: ��t. Pau] Water Utility ^~— --' [�l Water Holding Pond PROJECT: Clear a DATE: September 15 1988 SUMMARY Introduction The applicant is requesting a comprehensive plan amendment and 'conditional use permit to construct a clear water holding pond. (Refer to the letter and maps on pages 7-9 describing the pond and its purpose.) The plan amendment is required because the property i�� designated for park use. " �� conditional use permit is required fczr a publi utility use in a farm residential district. This property is designated as a search area for a community it playfield in the City's park system plan. (See page 10") Commun y playfields are intended to be at least ten acres and to serve a city-wide need for athletics, including parking, toilets and th lighting The parks plan states that at ultimate development, e City will " be deficient o+ 1()0 acres of land for community playfields. This is based on an ultimate City population c»ft is ��6 628" This population projection seems high, since the City c� 2/3 developed with a population of 29,0008 The City had leased this site for park use from, 1974-8618 The site i was never developed because o f neighborhood opp�sition. en City Code requires ten findings for permit. Refer to the resolution on Recommendation i` Approve the resolution on Page designation for this site from the basis that: approval of a conditional use page 12. 11, deleting the park comprehensive plan, on the A The City's director of parks and recreation +eel�� that the cost o ` a community playfield or any other type of park on this site cannot be justified. B. This site is needed for a water treatment pond. d C~ The ultimate City population used to projec t the nee for a community playfield on this site appears to be too high. D. The City leased this si for a park from 1974^ but did not develop it because of neighborhood opposition. %% Approve the resolution on page 12 approving a conditional use pe i. a clear-water pond, Subject to the following conditions: A. The pond shall only be used to store clarified water from the spent lime lagoons. B A landscaping plan, showing enough landscaping to create a more pa - ^ rk like atmosphere ' shall be submitted for staff approval . C. There shall be no dumping or storing of borrow materials on the site. D. The pump station shall be placed underground. E. There shall be no odors from the pond. Fr. The hours of operation shall be after 7 a.m. and before 7 p.m" ~ G. The City may require a fence around the pond at a later time if a problem develops. H. No hauling debris shall accumulate on surrounding public streets. I. The pond shall be kept in operation for at least eight months of the year. It shall not be drained, except for maintenance or unforeseen circumstances that result in a temporary draining. J. The area surrounding the pond will be kept mowed and any trash picked up^ � CITIZEN COMMENTS Cit -Surve 17 of the 35 propert owners within 350 feet of the site responded to .a surve Seven-were in favor, five had no comment and four objected. One person both objected and was in favor. He thought the pond would be an improvement over what is there now, but felt the water woul.d draw unwanted geese Those in favor gave the following comments: 1{ No mos odors or nois pumps. Stipulate that this pond wil I not become a I ime deposit pond in the future a The police should patrol this area o+ ten , especiall if it starts becoming a drinking spot for y oung adultse The pond would improve the I ooks of the area and get rid of the nois trucks which are there constantl now. Those opposed gave the +ol I owing comments: This is a commercial installation in a residential neighborhood, which will facilitate a nuisance and an e Land values will depreciate and a public liabilit will result. The return of this I and to a communit p a iel d woul d be an accept abl e asset to the communit We need a park for the children in this area. Wh not put in a nice pla or softball diamonds tennis courts or something we could all use. Roseville doese Id like to see more from Maple wood s A nice park for the kids would have a lot of neighborhood supports The communit pla concept has . s never been developed and given an opportunit to evolve. Let's give it a tr (Note: There were four people favoring a park. One lives on S street, two on Burne Street and one on Maple Lane in St. Paul.) Water Utility Meet in The Water Utilit and the Cit Engineer met with the neighbors on S Street. The neighbors at this meeting said the did not want a park, picnic tables or an that would attract people from outside the neighborhood a REFERENCE Site Des 'cription Area: 9.4 acres Surrounding land uses North: Water works road and propert West: Railroad tracks south: Larpenteur Avenue East: Si.ncjl e-dwel I ing homes kd Attachments: 1. Land use plan 2. Property I ine/zoning map 3. Letter- Water Ut i l ity 4. Site plan 5. Cross-sect i on 6. Park s plan 7. Resolution- plan amendment E3. Resolution- conditional use permit 90 Letter - Parks 4 I PIL ME milli IN wy. 36 f r ■nisi s■ ■■ "' •r ii IND re t ■'■��,,, :: ON ME along �v ��1 s. �v ��1 1708 _ } : - •• 1694 ,101) = 1686 _ y� h Ar o • . t' F ..� w. �A _ PROPERTY LINE" / ZONING MAP 6 Attachment 2 4 N • O� w K _. __ .. -a . . __ �__ _ _. .r E ) �� 50�1�'�► of 1111Ic�t's!' Commis � u� 1772 �; 1766 t • .� 1758 s 1 1754 _ t� t � , vim'. �•>`� -,. � . ,.._ lop 04LL �, w r . . • � �T 4 t� s 1720 ii,. i 1708 _ } : - •• 1694 ,101) = 1686 _ y� h Ar o • . t' F ..� w. �A _ PROPERTY LINE" / ZONING MAP 6 Attachment 2 4 N ... ... .- - � i, ,......�......,,..... _. � .. ....... _ _. ,. ..... .....- +.......me- ..w.it.s..c ..... Via..., A..e..+.�,r...., .,. - .�., -.w.. « .., ...... ..,.... ..�... ._.. ... a�3 ,..�v.., ,.. .. ._.... x., .....,.+..., ., .. .. .. w . ,;;: er,...+. wi+:....<. s�- .- ...,a..:a:..v:.raUrr;;nw: raa+f,. i�iir,. � e •,:. Clear Water Pond St. Paul Water Utility The proposed pond wi11 be part of a recycl ing system for the St. Paul Water Treatment Plant. It will provide temporary storage for clarified water from the spent lime lagoons located to the north of Rosel awn Avenue. Only clear water from the surface of the lagoons w i l l be admitted to the pond. The water will be pumped by an existing pump station from the lagoon effluent ditch to a gravity pipeline to be constructed as part of this project. . At the pump station the water will be treated with potassium permanganate as necessary to reduce the odor sufficiently for recycling. The gravity pipeline will carry the water south along the west edge of the water utility property to the pond. At the south end of the pond another pump station will be constructed to recycle the pond effluent back to the water treatment plant. This pump station will be either an underground design or a low - profile above - ground design suitable for use in a residential area. As planned the pond will provide a major improvement to the site, which is now being used for temporary storage of fill material. On June 29, 1988, a meetin to discuss the pond design was held, attended by neighborhood residents, the Maplewood City Engineer, and representatives of the St. Paul Water Utility and Progressive Consulting Engineers. Many constructive suggestions were made by those attending which have been incorporated into the design. The attached drawing shows the contours or the pond as planned. The water surface will be below the existing grade except at the southwest, where a six foot high dike will be constructed. Inside and outside side slopes will be 4:1 horizontal to vertical. The operating water depth of the pond will be four feet. A maintenance roadway surfaced with crushed rock will circle the pond; access to the roadway will be at the north end through a cable gate. The land is designated as a community playfield at present, but it has never been utilized as such. An application for comprehensive plan amendment accompanies this application. 7 Attachment 3 M * t • �1L��.' W �r ,l• S �t fD , fi 4bo owA qt Jill Vill • ir .. , r , pi •',• ~�� • �: � • ' •r•. •..�.. �.• + .... • +•` .:.: .•r 'r, •. t' ft. wow �-- •.� awal • r `w` .w . . '!q" _ .�.. -mow... •" . a�r • w r•• L �•4��t- •r •.• AID► ".•� `.wy•.► �• - ., r •° .. � _ � • . =.11 • .Y�� •• • • AI ✓..•./• • -r•. •. .. �. �� •�1��• �'� •�.� ...JM•= •�'� . ,.i� +.V�•..: '•�1 4 ' � ••••�� • �• • .ti ,; •. .. � . i IJ - •^• ... .: �.�. L '� ;'.;�� • +RLr '•-�• ^�• • +'M� W ••'.: �M- ..•.,',."r•��+~ ++'n �r� �..lt ; 'i• . = •� ✓• .• • .. .+i:•r''.. ti:.:'S'r.':lh'- }"x'.:.►� "�1�. •► •�•'.it . �' �(Iir v • ` • ' ' ' J:�� �`. .... :: • ,t: ^ ''' .•. r • ��?�'1�'ir - �� Al j .lam ., r •-. ! • t..•+I•� ' A•�r� r �li• 4 . • �"'�r�•.... ��• .• •S..• 'j .. . . B *01 VOIL A now OW N 0, Flo V- -WNW SEC A-A C-) I 0 UI) kD (D 0 C+ J. 0 :3 3> C+ C+ 0) 0 (D =3 C+ SEC B-B Ai 0 VADNAIS HE 0 17 C 1�9 - WWt KA11 LUC I IPFAN 0 I 11, TV 8W 16W MVP 7 4, 0 es L C F:3 NP rj76.. I r all V.4 - film map IQ purposes onl and should Gl, not be used where precise measuieffent is required. LITTLE CANADA ST. PAUL a4z ..« 041 7 - O-A CIO '"! 0 PAUL '. - ov & A CP A6 two" N P I Owl 91 a fu 0 ago n ST. PAUL .i / «' •.� wl� t *I i a t O [a October 1980 0. Z 3M w 3M is M Id now *4114 off sow O&W P N P 0 PF Z law C O •. tit SMINGTON CO. MP Mini Park NP , Neighborhood. Park CP Communit Park CPF Community Playffeld S Special Use Sites C+ C+ RC Ramse County Park 0 Future Mini Park Search Areas TJ Sear6h Areas for NP Sites I ,Q C+ EM Search Areas for CPF Sites 10 Acre Minimum I Revised: 6-13-84 )repared by: 10-09-85 000 0 L A KfMI acturo. pwwun A Desi Suft 100 261" cenVW " ME ark S ste Ian Whrmavoia Mm 55418 IN-5n *I i a t O [a October 1980 0. Z 3M w 3M is M Id now *4114 off sow O&W P N P 0 PF Z law C O •. tit SMINGTON CO. PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION WHEREAS the St" Paul Water Utility initiated an amendment to the Map]ewood Comprehensive PI an from P park to Wp water +aci1ity for the +o]lowing property at the northwest corner of L.appenteur and Syl van " WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as frxlI ows: 1, The Maplewood Planning Commission held wx public hearing on September 19, 1988 to consider this plan amendment" Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written The planning commission recommended t the city council statements. � p an� M� ���� �� �n ��c��me� e o that said �lan amendment be approved. 2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on October 10, 1988" The council considered reports and recommendations +rom the planning commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The City's Director of Parks and Recreation feels that the cost of a community playfield or any other type of park on this site cannot be justified. 2 . This site is needed for a water treatment pond a 3. The ultimate City population used to project the need for a community playfield on this site appears to be too high. 4. The City leased this site for a park from 1974-86, but did not develop it because of neighborhood oppositiong Adopted this 10th da of October, 19884 Seconded b A 11 Attachment 7 Pursuant to due Call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held' in the council chambers in said city on the 10th day of October 1988 at T p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the St. Paul Water Utility initiated a conditional use permit to construct a clear-water pond at the following-described property: Lots 1 thru 10, Block 5 Lots 1 thru 19, Block 10, Lots 1 thru 8 and all of Lot 19, Block 9 St. Aubin & Dion's Rice Street Addition, together with those portions of vacated alleys and vacated Park Street, Kingston Avenue and Price Avenue accruing thereto, subject to the Soo Line Railroad right-of-way, and* the following: That portion of the Southwest one-quarter of the Southwest one- quarter ofEection18,Tcwnship29 North, Range 22 West described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Section 18 thence North along the West line of said section a distance of 878.66 feet; thence East along the North line of St. Aubin & Dion's Rice Street Addition a distance of 548.1 feet to the point of beginning Easterly along the North line of St. Aubin & Dion's Rice Street Addition a distance of 414 feet; thence North 8 degrees 11' 00" East a distance of 264 feet; thence West along a line parallel with the North line of St. Aubin & Dion's Rice Street Addition a distance of 474 feet; thence Southerly along the Easterly line of the Soo Line right-of-way to the point of beginning. Ramsey County, Minnesota, This property is al so known as the northwest corner of Larpenteur and 3yl van . WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: i. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on September 19, 1988" The planning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be 12 Attachment 8 2s The Ma ewobd Cit Council held a publ is hearing on October 10 1988 Not ice thereof was P ubl ished and ma I ed pursuant to 1 aw. Al I persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the cit staff and planning commissions 4NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL THAT the above-described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings- -of -fact: in The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2s The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public heal th safet or general welfare* . 3s The use would be located designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning districts 4s The use would not depreciate propert valuesu 5n The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke dustq odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -of +, vibration., I gene unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6s The use would generate onl minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7m The use would be,serviced b essential public services, such as streets9 pol ice g fire protection, utities, schools and parks. il Be The use would not create excessive additional re at publ ic cost f or publ ic f ac i l ities and services; and woul d not be detrimental to the welfare of the city" 90 The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development designs 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: re clarified water from the in The pond shall onl be used to store spent I ime lagoons a 2s A landscaping plan, showing enough landscaping to create a more park- . like atmosphere, shall be submitted for staff approval. 3s There shall be no dumping or storing of borrow materials on the site* 13 4. The pump station shall be placed underground. 5, There shall be no odors from the pond. . 6. The hours of operation shall be after 7 a.m. and before 7 p.m. 7. The City may require a fence around the pond at a later time if a problem develops. 8. No hauling debris shall accumulate on surrounding public streets. 9. The pond shall be kept in operation for at least eight months of the year. It shall not be drained, except for maintenance or unforeseen �circumstances that result in a temporary draining. 10. The area surrounding the pond will be kept mowed and any trash picked up. Adopted this day of , 1988. Seconded by Ayes-- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. ) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1988 with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full , true and complete transcript insofar as the same r*wlates to a conditional use permit. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1988. City Clerk Cit of Maplewood 14 49 MEMORANDUM To: Park and Recreation Commissioners From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Parks Subj Removal Of Sylvan Park As Designation Community Playf ield Date: September 13, 1988 creatio & Re �- For l The St. Paul Water Department . is requesting approval from the City of Maplewood for improvements to the property formerly called Sylvan Park which was located at Larpenteur Avenue and Sy lvan. Since the property at one time was desigated for a Com munity Playfield in the City's Comprehensive Plan, it is re- quested by the Director of Community Development Geoff Olson that the Park and Recreation Commission make a recommendation to the Plannin g Commission to officially remove the park from the Park System Plan. In 1974 the City of Maplewood entered into a lease arrangement with the Board of Water Commissioners of the City of St. Paul for the use of the property on Larpenteur and Sylvan, which is south o f t he operating Water Treatment Plant. The park was to be used p g for adult softball, but was never consummated due to neighborhood op In 1985, Mr. Thomas Mogren, General Manager for the Board of W ater Commissioners, notified the City that they were in need of the property as a borrow source for ut ility construction p roj ects and as a pipe storage area. This matter was brought to t he Park and Recreation Commi ssion on on June 17, 1985, as a point t of informations The Community Playf field designation for the area indicated that it was the intent of the City to have a facility that would serve the City-wide need for athletics. Community Playf ield sites are scheduled for recreation programs, both youth and adult, and should P rovide good accessibility to three to f ive neighborhoods. The sites are usually suited to intensive development and adja- cent to collector or arterial streets. In addition to the ath- letic facilities, the supportive facilities would include park- ing areas, toilets, lighting, etc. Since the St. Paul Board of water Commissioners could make a very g ood case for health, welfare, and safety of the water supply, and the need for this property to accomplish this, it is highly unlikely that the City could either buy or condemn the property for park pu rposes * Recommendation It is recommended that the Park and Recreation Commission go on record as releasing the property f ormerl_y_ cal led_ Sylvan Park on the Park System Plan as a designated Community Playf field for the City of Maplewood and recommends to the City Planning Commission that it be deleted from the Comprehensive Plan. 15 Attachment 9 F -O� I Planni.ng C ommission Minutes 9-19-88 • Bil 1 Cha man 365 E. Kel I ogg BI vd. St Paul a pl arming with the Migglers on their site, explained consul tan work ing 0 concern with additional sewer costs from the main the Miggl e W their property Mr. Chapman ecommended that g oing throng r the new street be based actual lengthq size shared costs p osed platted I ots and depth ,.of S er necessary to serve pr from an existin sewer on Highwa 61 4 ntage road Dick Sullivan of DOT q uestioned wh e the proposed sewer line would run across th MnDOT property Co mmissioner Fischer ved the p 1 nning c ommission recommend Approval of the re lutio to amend the sanitary sewer element of the comprehen • ve I an to reroute a 1 armed f uture trunk I ine 9 northwest -Fro t e proposed MnDOT Research Facil itY , through the. Mi r property (north of Gervais Avenue and west Of Gerten Pond) ighway 61, rather than al ong Highway 36 as presently an d. Approval is based . on the +ollowing f indings: a. The Highway 6 alignm nt would be more costl because • would,,be constru ted in the +ror-rtage roads The Mi alignmetit would be b ail t with a new street and the costs shared with the Mi developments b 'There i al read a sewer n the f rontage road to serve adjacent properties. Put in-g the sewer through the Mi si�e would serve abuttin properties as well as relieve 7 e lift station. 20 Make a ending that the proposed s reet improvement is consistent ith the comprehensive plan. Al so re that an rights to he BN co I rridor be deeded to th Citys 3a Mak a finding that the proposed drai a and water main improve ents are not part of the comprehens . ve pl, an and , there+- re not inconsistent with the compreh ns i ve pl an 4. APProval of the resolution to prohibit p a king on the sou side-of Gervais Avenuelp A arrett, gp Dempsey seconded Cardinal Dempsey-j Fiola, Fischer, S1.gmundik4j Sletten and S St. (St. Paul Water UtilitY.) Be Larpenteur Ave. Plan amendment Conditional use permit Planning C ommission Minutes 9-19-SE3 Secretary 01 son presented the staff report Bob Odegard ,. and Recreation explain6d the present park Director of Parks a for park developments -we s plan and future plans Commissioner Fischer moved the planning co mmission recommend: is Approval of the resolution deleting the park designation 0 for this site from the comprehensive plang on the basis that An The Cit director of parks and. recreation feels that the cost of a com pla or an other type o+--park on this site cannot be just if ied B . o This site is needed for a water treatment pond C The ultimate City p used to project the need for a communit pla on this site appears to be too Do The City I eased this site for a park from 1974-86, but did not develop it because of neighborhood oppositions Approval of the resolution approving a conditional use permit for a clear-water pond subject to the following conditions: As The pond shat I onl be used to store clari . +ied water from the spent lime lagoonse B A landscaping plan, showing enough landscaping to create a more park-like atmosphereq shall be submitted for staff approvals ce There shall be no dumping 'ng Or storing of borrow materials on the site. Do The pump station shall be placed underground& Es There shall be n odors from the ponds Com missioner Sletten seconded A f Barrettq Cardinal Dempseyq Fiola -p Fischer Si Sletten vie vISI IR 'IESENTATIONS CO T3 Vii. 0 ATIONS y ' MEMORANDUM Aotilmz by Council./ Endorsed—______ Mod if±ed______- . Rej eo±ed_______ Date TO: City Manager FROM: Director 0f Community Development SUBJECT: Code Amendment--Abandoned or Junk Vehicles Y]ATEx November 7 1988 The City Council initiated this code amendment. Staff also received a similar request from a resident. This ordinance adds unlicensed vehicles to the definition of abandoned vehicles and consolidates two similar code sections into one to avoid inconsistent and redundant ordinances. The current definition in section 19-28 is from State law. Provision is also made to allow the City Council to grant special exemptions, after a hearing, where the vehicle would not cause a nuisance. There may be cases where it is unreasona s ble to require the cots of 1 icen51ng and insurance where a vehicle would not cause a nuisance. This may be where a veh1cle is not unsightly and is being stored in an area not visible to adjacent residents. RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached ordinance. jl ATTACHMENTS 11 Ordinance 2. Survey ORDINANCE NOW AP4 ORDINANCE AMENDING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR JUNKED OR ABANDONED MOTOR VEHICLESs The Maplewood Cit Council hereb ordains as +01 1 ows (additions are underlined and deletions crossed out): Section 1. Section 19-9, describing t of nuisances, is amended b revising paragraph 10 as follows: (10) The pil ing storing or k%eep.ing of of d machinery vehicle arts o I d tires,_ an-d o other junk or debris. act -i Ve+ Y - be+mq Section 2. Section 19•2e is amended b revising the abandoned motor vehicle definition as follows: Abandoned or j uni-%- metatm vehicle: "Abandoned or jUnk- - mototm vehicle" means a motor vehicle or trailer, as defined in Section 169.01 Minnesota Statutes that has remained for a -. period of more than +ort (48) hours on public propert illegall or la6.--.ing vital component parts, or has remained for a period of more than +ort (48) hours on private propert without the consent of the person in control of such propert or in an inoperable condition such that it has no substantial potential further use consistent with its usual functions, or is unlicensed, unless it is screened from the view of ad_jacent residences or kept in an enclosed garage or storage building. It steal 1 also mean a motor vehicle voluntaril surrendered b its owner to and accepted b the Cit or its agent. A cl ' assic car or pioneer car, as defined in Section 168.10 Minnesota Statutes, shall not be considered an abandoned motor vehicle, so 1 can -as it is currently -1-- i censed as such and act ivel y . bein g _ restored . Vehicles on the premises of jun�---. y ards 7 amd automobi-le sales and re lots and automobile grave which are defined, maintained and licensed in accordance with Section 161.242, Minnesota Statutes or which are licensed and maintained in accordance with this Code or other ordinance of the Cit including zoning regal at ions q shall not be 2 considered abandoned motor vehicles within the meaning o+ this de`i.'i'io.. The City Council ma certain veh.icles +rom. this de+inition,- where the vehicles -would not cause a nuisance. The Cit Council shall cause a notice to ' be sent to all adjacent propert owners at least ten..--da be+ore the decision is made. ' Section 3. Section 19-29is amended asfollows: Section 19-29. Violation" Abandoned motor -vehicles are___prohibiteds An person who abandons a motor vehicle in the City on an public or*% private propert is g uilt y o+ a misdemeanor,,, Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Council this day of , 1988. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Ayes-- Nays-- � SURVEY ,Does your city require vehicle registration on residential property? . Citv -___- Coon Rapids yes � Roseville no Burnsville no Brooklyn Center yes Fridley no Blaine yes ' Crystal yes New Brighton yes New Hope yes Golden Valley yes White Bear Lake yes Apple Valley yes ' South St. Paul yes Eagan yes Maple Grove yes Columbia Heights yes Cottage Grove yes West St. Paul yes North St. Paul yes Oakdale yes Woodbury yes Little Canada yes Newport no, but ordinance � being rewritten � MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Associate Planner-Johnson SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat and Rezoning LOCATION: Cypress Street APPLICANT/OWNER: Goff Homes,, Inc. PROJECT TITLE: Knollwomd Circle DATE: November 3 1988 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION ��- Action by Counoij8 Modifie"___--�-� (F td R-1) Reaecte i� Dat 1 ^ The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval for a fourteen lot s ingle-dwelling development (Refer to the map on , page .�.) i the rezoning of this area from F farm 2, City staff is proposing to R-1 , single dwelling to eliminate any f arm-re lated nuisance activity. 3 ^ 20,000 cubic yards of dirt would be removed from the site. ' t k hauling hours a day, Five days per week ruc s au ing eig , With three '' '' '- - - - can be completed in the requested sand and gravel extraction approximately 20 days" With two trucks, the hauling would about 30 days. The number of trucks is dependent upon the size of the loader that is available. The proposed pace translates i'nto s1x trips from the site each hour for two trucks, and nine trips each hour if three trucks are used. The north 180± feet of Cypress Street is the only local street along the haul route within the City of Maplewood" The remainder of the route (County «uau C and Highway 61) is designated for truck traffic. The proposed 8 to 4 work-day should also minimize the impact on the neighbors. 1 ^ In 1986 the applicant was issued a grading permit to remove ' l d to rough this site. Council revoked sand and grave and - -- rough-grade - to neighborhood this qradinq permit last fall in response ccmtroTling the complaints that the applicant was not adequately dust, truck traffic, or noise. 2 ^ Previous mining activity has resulted in a steep escarpment through the site. This escarpment must be that runs north/south - =i�e pment, eliminate the develo removed to prepare the site - - . control soil erosion . t residents, and con r possibility of injury o res , ` �. ="-. ~'__-_. DISCUSSION h b 1 The main concern with this projec t �s been the applicant's past performance in grading the site. staff feels that requiring compliance with the mining ordinance, restricting hours of operation, a $5,000 letter of credit, and increased staff monitoring of the grading should resolve most of the past problems. The proposed plat is consistent with the land use plan, zoning and platting codes. RECOMMENDATION 1" Approve the Knollwood Circle preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: a. The following conditions must be met before final plat approval: 1) City staff approval of final grading, erosion control utility, drainage, street and tree preservation plans. The storm sewer plan shall address the localized flooding problem that occurs in the vicinity of proposed lot one. 2) The development shall comply with the tree preservation requirements of the Environmental Protection Ordinance. At least 65 existing or newly planted trees shall be on the site when construction is complete. 3) Submit a signed developer's agreement with the re suret for all re public improvementsO 4) Correct the legal description. b" Any grading or extraction of sand or gravel must comply the City's mineral and soil excavations and extractions ordinance (Chapter 36, Article IV), with the following exceptions and additions: 1) Site grading within thirty feet of an adjoining property line shall not commence until all of the sand and gravel excavation activity has ceased, as determined by the City engineer, except that no grading or excavation shall be permitted within thirty feet of the west property line. 2) No noise from equipment is permitted before 8 a.m. or after 4 p.m. No activity is permitted on Saturda Sunda or holidaysu 3) Soil material shall not be tracked onto Cypress Street or Count Road C0 � 4) Submit $5,000 letter of credit and a signed mineral extraction agreement to the city engineer, as directed b Section 36-412 o + cit code. 5) Submit ` schedule for the duration o+ all grading and gravel extraction activity on this site, ' This schedule shall address erosion control extraction, rehabilitation, rough and final grading. 20 Approval of the resolution on page 15 to rezone this site and the property adjoining to the north from F, farm residence to R-1, single dwelling. (At least fcur votes infavor are needed for approval .) � CITIZEN COMMENTS St� f surveyed 57 persons who own property that is located within ~' the twelve responses, four are in �50 feet of this property. Of e we �e resp , favor, one is conditionally in +avor, two had no comment and twelve are opposeds ` ll i f The person conditionally n avor (Forest Street) wants: (1) the +inal surface drainage for the new properties not to cause drainage problems for existing homes; (2) to have the homes to be built to be of such quality so as to not negatively effect the value of existing homes and (3) save as many trees that border the proper t y as possible but "% know this may not be possible. Staff reply: The City has an obligation to insure that the drainage from this site will not cause a problem for adjoining owners. The City cannot regulate the value or design of single dwellings other than to require a minimum floor area. Regarding con~~er`` � Number Three, a condition of approval will be to require tree reservation plan that complies with the City's a n»n p - ental protection ordinance. Trees will not be permitted environmental to be removed unless deemed necessary f or the reasonable use o+ the site. Some tree replanting may be necessary, if a large number of trees must be removed. Those opposed raised the following concerns. (Also, refer to the letters on pages 10-12): of soil material would be 1 a. Excessive amount so removed. ^ the de of the entrance Increase e gra ^ Development in the areas sho -' as Lots -2 and 3 (page 9) should be prohibited or severely restricted to preserve the steep slope that is heavily wooded with evergreen trees. I would possibly accept it if only the east side of the site were to be developed. b. I want the area left as is. We bought our home (Forest Street) because of open grassy and treed areas behind our home. Destruction of wildlife, pond and natural drainage, I feel would lessen the attractiveness and, therefore, the value of our property. Staff reply: This site is planned for single-dwelling home use. The City cannot prohibit development unless the property is purchased by the public. There are no plans'to do so. The drainage pattern in this vicinity is generally the result of a partially completed 15 to 20 year-old mining operation. The wetland in the northwest corner of this site is not needed for drainage purposes. It also provides very little nutrient assimilation because it has a very small watershed. As such, the applicant could fill this wetland, but he has chosen to retain a significant portion of it for aesthetic purposes. The steep slope does not qualify +or preservation under the City's � environmental protection ordinance, b accessed directly from County Road (� 2n This site should e a�ce� r�c y v rather than from Cypress Streeta The d i the reply: T e �r�p��e access is From th p perspective of traffic circulation fewer intersections along am collector street, �such as Count)/ Road C the better. Since the -- ti i the on proposed, the City has no basis best street location s e e p " n upon '+vhich - orequire the applicant to buy more land to pursue condemnation of additional propert 3~ Excessive traffic on area streets. Staff ' . l .: The county and City engineers have stated that the public s in this area are designed to handle the short- term truck traffic, as well as the long-term residential traffic that would result from this development. County Road C is expected to handle upwards o+ vehicle trips per day. In 1987, the county recorded a traffic count of only 2,000 vehicles. 4. During last spring's rainFall , water did not drain on Palm Court (west of this site, a quarter mile), what about a new project--same problem? How will this proJect effect our water tabl e? Staff reply: The soils in this location drain better than near Palm Court. This development should not cause an increase in the water table in this vicinity. � REFERENCE Area: 6,5+ acres Existing land use: un eveloped Environmental Thi s property is the site of former excavation/mining activity. .A steep escarpment runs north/south through the site" The west boundary is heavily wooded with evergreen trees. Mature. deciduous trees are located along the southeast and north boundaries. A wetland is located in the northwest portion of the property. It is not needed as a storm water retention pondv or as anutrient stripping basin. Howsover, the applicant intends to leave it generally intact for aesthetic purposes, Comment: The applicant's proposal calls for 61+ five to twelve- inch diameter trees to be preserved, principally along the west property line. Several other four-to-five inch diameter trees/ evergreens are also to be savedu The developer is obligated to have at least 65 trees on this site when construction is complete. To count existing trees, they must be four inches or greater in diameter. Any shortfall must be made up by planting trees at least 2 1/2 inches in diameter. PLANNING The maximum density allowed in the City land use plan is 14 people/net acre. The minimum lot area is 15,000 square feet. This proposal has a density of only 10.4 people/net acre. The lots average 17,133 square . feet of area. The average lot area of adjoining lots in only 12,894 square feet. j1\rjgoff ATTACHMENTS 11 Location Map 2^ Property Line/Zoning Map 3~ Preliminary Plat (8 1/2 x 11) 418 - 6. Letters from Adjoining Owners 7. Applicant's Letter 8 Resolution (Rezoning) 9^ Preliminary Plat/Grading Plan (Separate attachment) � C /TY OF [l M I�� MI R3 R F BC M R I � F . R F R PUD R KOHLM r R COLWTY R R2 r_j R - • •fti W R • .PUD • \� (r a 2 R F F OEMONT M I �' "' � R R a R ' R o SC a..._..... AIE a z • Mt �+ R R y x �. It M I MI MI C !� M I R I. IC TRUw Fi 0 S WAY M I p ` ' 1 • R R z -3C Q F v • C TY P UO A 1 � • v, to • LEL A NO '� l� ® T A C F F I: r tR 2� o R ..e.. D d C RE v F . ,, rtr'c a vE � . � � R3 C R R F R T L�� AiE ® ' 1 f�� F SEA H $KILLMA4 A W g ��� F a2 �- R C Cr _ ` n I r LOCATION MAP � Attachment 1 4 N an �• Zi�s9._� + ww 30 14 too- .3 — -. . 3s 2630 970 w 988 1 fl0`1`1' :• i ,� 3.V7 �. 262 S + �••�� ? ~:'i : f+ ..._ . - s ::;f : �iYi :� Y�•i'a ❖cif .•; ❖�:r •;'L.iii :• �• / 2612 ❖ z ❖ :....•..,. :. ❖..RY R..•:::: •.:: . • •: ::::: • :: :i: :�� :•: :: • •::::• • i •: • .� • S•'• • �:•..R :• v.. •.• :.• •:.....: • l r.'.•: :: •: • • :: • Zu- 261 x e 11216 4 . C • Vii:: •. • :•i :.,• s, •••if ar•••P�i,�.•.�•S• •: •:Y• • J 2596 .............., ..... • .... ..... —W. Mee. ee* ..... ......:...Y.....::.: 2586 :•: :..; . • ... • fS Xv 1 !1V • • • Z : :: •i :: •• :i••:: : : :: : : : :,i• :: •Y: : :, :••• : K . • ^7 2 7 :i• : : : :• ; :: : :,:•r :::• ••i : :•:::Y :•R :i :•: :� :` : : :: ::• : :R � ��V - S :�Y i• �f • :.. : : :•: • :: ..... r� •• , :. .... ...; ..:; ;... .............. • • • .. . ;.; ;. . 3 • 257 = � :•::...:.: :•:: :•::.:.......... 5 ---saw 33� C56 _ 1 i9.lt Q .'::..:.''':..:.. :.....:: X . R if 2 57 Xxe % �0 jI 96 7 ► ' S ONN I A Eiv i s �1� 4 1 •�� �, 14 4 1 1 10 � �` �' /6!. y ' � ; x• .8 1 �. 3 4 5. A 41 4 8 7 3 , �•� .i % 2 op r1 _ 1A 15 • (. �. • PROPERTY - LINE /ZONING MAP s Area to be platted Attachment 2 4 N ♦ •rte r•• •O-•rr •rrr• w. ��� • w •rte••• •r.r.. . , - • ••. • • If �•.••._r•..• ��� ►• • �.� N � r r.rr T .►...r r•... �. '! . = j.� 1 -. � �• • ••• •• -r. err • � �� �• • �� �• r •�,�,r �'� �rr, - � FM.rw �r.•r.n••• ••nn�nwr� •rr•F�••r• { � • • , .. �• 1 ,' / 1 .1 1 •�� 111 to 'f 1 1 • IZ • . •� �t . . i It 9 E7 .mow.. ��. •. 1 • • • •�,• �\ .'• 1 ; , • • • • ` 1 . • .� 1 • . •, 1 ` •�'• • % .•` • �H 1 • {1 i ♦ 111. 1/ � f � I••• • ••. • oo st OF is As 0 0 so lot pt { . • / - •'. 1/ •.r•r••.••+I •11 1 / 1' 1 1 • { 1 •..�•���• , 1•a , 1 , 1 1 , , 1 ••.. • . 1 1 • . • • 1 / • • + • 1 1 1 1 / 1 • •r / r l 1 f>ri w��� ` • • - . •. • • II 1 . ' • 1; 1 `••�' `•� I • J� 1, • o f valp oil* 9 is dwOOw •w. 4b* so 1 IF so It _�• •� T • �, • , 1 1 F r r r. ••i • •,_ • • • •. • Ala 1 1 1 1 � ♦ • • � • f . � alt 1• •.�, ,� ••. • r . • f // 111 .' •' 1 , • ` • 1 • I t ' / 111 ,� fit { •� ,'.' , � 11 1 1 � ` ���•�• � / � 1 1 ' ' 1 . V •• h 1 s11�' �1 / • t 111 8' #a, or •� • ,• •• ; . 1 • + 111 t • ... �••' +• • • ' • 11 ►I to I oilI — •ter r�.rr� • • r /- -• lop• - • • • • , • J. % 1 1 { 1 411 • , ••• •••'• �• • I , •' • • ` 1 11 • I -/ 000 ,• • (Q • i l . ,,•• Q • • �' a .. I , Ile Op IF • IN 1 1 •• �i• . ,� • •may. / ,• ♦ / A' Ob Ob I ft If • ' a � 1 t j ' • i + • •1 •� • ; 1 / / 1 dp Jf so _ / • - .. O tte 4.0 1 � i r �- / 1 , --t' . ,� �C i t 0 • F Preliminary -Plat 9 Attachment 3 4 N .... w.., r:l:_ MKS J.: M:...:.:�i::JY.nL.}.lrc_t'.'K.t ..... ..rw..u+rwv ..•_. ra.. �.�....... �..�a..... ..-.. �...� .....�..... ... _._.. i t •. J T ' object to tha pnonoa a.0 because We know what a pnvbtem we had the .Ca.at time .a and and gna.vet were m�.ned 61%om th i,s ' pnapeh ty. We had to keep oun dacha and windowa c eons ed and 6ti.tt had a pna6tem with duds and di,ht in owe, homes and had to make many cu.Z& to Map2eiuoad to get .same ne,Q,i,e6. Why weten't we noti6ied the .Cast time band and 9na.ve,2 wene nemaved? G1a6 a peAni,t gna.wted the .2a6t time? In the Jutute, .i6 homez arse buitt an tkZ6 pnapenty a e e waters and duinage wilt JZow to emoti ditchu and .then to Koahtman Lake TW waters with ..nc tude bug and weed Hitt etas , .6 and, .6 it t, comps s t, manure, etc. Ats o ., .ig wale -t .us exte n ded to this pnopelr ty, haw much wiU the deveZo pen pay to o6 j.6 et what we, ass nes �,dent6 o J County Road C, have aheady pa t.d? Ats a what wit the cha e be pen itont 600t, ptus .a tub cliatcg e and ups en pevnit ? The expenz e we had to pay was due and payable quite .dame time be6ane the project was z to rted. 985 and 988 East County Road C' Attachment 4 10 1. Danger, to small children on playground. 2. Loud trucks with banging tailgates. 3. Loader makes excessive. noise when stuck. 40 Contract is ast erf - ormance indicates disrp and fo r t i city I s laws on ------- project. 5. Land in question is lakeshed area. 60 County road load limits exceeded on loaded.trucks. 79. Road used not a hard surface. 8. Proposed time table conflicts with recreational playground and lake home time. 9. Letter to city engineer unprofessional, first names of principals used. 10. Land can be built on as is. 11. Goff Homes builds homes, not mines. 12. Mines belong in Hibbing. 13. Extreme amounts of dust and dirt in air. �� Attachment 5 2595 Cypress I object to this project because of destruction to connecting properties which they care nothing about and have proved it. I still have damage to-my property from the first removed dirt. They left it very dangerous, not caring about injuries to kids that may wander in this area. They cause much dust and uncomfort to the residents. They lie about how they will take care of problems. The street is bad enough without them wrecking it any more l i k e they did in 1987. No, I feel as being a taxpayer and being in this area longer than they have., I don't trust them, believe them, or care to have the area left to look as rotten as they left it last time. If they violated the first permit, who says they can't do it again while we pay for it. If they want us as homeowners in the Cypress Street area to go along with them, how about when they are finished with their project to have them pay to have Cypress blacktopped. We don't have much on Cypress Street without it costing an,arm and leg. No water, no street light, no fire hydrant, no blacktop, and it takes an act of God to get a hole patched. Why have some money— making outfit come and wreck what little we have got? Have them make good with what they wreck or keep out. John 12 Attachment 6 4 05 B8 GOFF HOMES 1959 SLOAN PLACE MAPLEWOOD, MN 55117 612-771-1364 April 5, 1988 Mr. Kenneth Haider cit En Ci of Maplewood 1902 East County Rd. B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Haider: Goff H ones purpose for the extraction of approximately twent thousand y ards of material is to bring the existing prop ei-i-y o buildable g rade for near future construction. j_ '.' t %_ A+C. this point-, it would allow an elevation workable to install utilities and g rade for proper drainage. our tire table would re 670 to 1,000 y ards to be A . removed daily. This brings a total of twent work days hol idays Monday thru Frida with no hauling on weekends or _L W e r,,Lust consider one week for clean up and disposing of L , ent weather debris a n�. five days for downtime such as inc3em we or unf Or_ seen circumstances. rom the site entrance approximately one hundred eight - fet. south y of Count Road C, the material would be hauled east on Counl%-Iy Road C to Hi 61, north on Highway 61 to Count-y Road E, west on County Road E to Centerville Road and south on Centerville Road to a desi site. The ten m ile L o - ound trip haul would take approxiately thirty t r nm forty-five mi nutes Lnutes. '. will be handled The drainage, wind and water erosion control daily b not leavin sharp slopes or overhanging ed A silt fence can be erected back a g iven d from an extreme slope. Site security will be a snow fence set up at the entrance wa daily. Should dust control be needed, a water unit will be on hand to sprinkle as re After we have completed the extraction a mulch and seed restoration will be put into effect to hold the remaining material intact. Enclosed Randy, please find the following documents: 13 Attachment 7 A. Conditional Use application (filled out) B. Correct le description C. Certified abstract listin names D Future site plan E. Grading plan Upon receiving approval for this mining extraction permit. we are re that we have until October, 1989 to complete the work. Should we not have started the extraction b October, 1989, we will reapply. Once we have started however, we will complete the extraction in the manner previously stated* Thank y ou Ken, for y our consideration and time on this matter. Should I have inadvertantly forgotten an please g ive me a call at #771-1364 and leave a message and I will g et ri back to you. Sincerely, Bruce J. Hil Goff Homes cc: Patrick Goff 14 i Pursuant to due call and notice thereo+ meeting o+the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of , 1988 at 7 p.m,, . The following members were present: The +ollowing members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F, farm l dwelling f the f ll ing _ residence to R single we ng or e o ow described - � properties: 1. SUB TO CO RD C AND EX W 247 5/10 FT AND EX E 247 5/10 FT, THE N 888 8/10 FT OF W 1/2 OF E 1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF SEC 9 TN 29 RN 2211 This property is commonly known as 970 East County Road C. 2. PART OF LOT 1 BLK 2 PETERS ADD LYING N OF A LINE 89.24 FT S OF MOST NLY COR OF SD LOT & S OF A LINE 145 FT S OF N LINE OF GEC 9 T 29 R 22 & E 247.5 FT OF N 888.8 FT OF W 1/2 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 LYING S OF FOL DESC LINE; BEG ON WLY LINE OF CYPRESS ST & 145 FT S OF N LINE OF SD SEC, TH W 16.84 FT, TH ANGLE L 40 DEG FOR 95.03 FT, TH NWLY AT RA TO S LINE OF N 145 FT, TH W ON SD LINE TO W LINE OF E 247.5 FT & THERE TERM, ALL IN NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SEC 9 TN 29 RN 22. 3, PART OF LOT 1 BLK 2 PETERS ADD & PART OF W 1/2 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 DEGC AS BEG ON NL OF SD 1/4 & EL OF SD W 1/2 ALSO BEING WL OF CYPRESS ST, TH SLY ON SD WL ST TO LINE RUN PAR TO & 145 FT S OF NL SD NW 1/4 TH W ON SD PAR LINE 16.84 FT TH ANG LEFT 40 DEG 95.03 FT TH NWLY AT RA TO SD SL OF N 145 FT TH E ON SD SL TO PT 100 FT W OF EL OF SD W 1/2 TH N TO NL NW 1/4 TH E TO BEG (SUBJ TO RD) IN SEC 9 TN 29 RN 22. This property is commonly known as 1000 East County Road C. 4, N 145 FT OF W 147.5 FT OF E 247.5 FT OF W 1/2 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 (SUBJ TO RD) OF SEC 9 TN 29 RN 22. This property is commonly known as 988 East County Road C. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. ' 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on . 1988 The Planning Commission , recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be ^ 31 The Maplewood Cit Council held a public hearing on l5 Attachment 8 » 1988 to c�sid�this r��ing.N�icethe���s published ^ mailed pursuant to law" All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BEITRESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical , efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. ' 5. Approval would eliminate any farm-related nuisances that may occur that would be incompatible with this single-dwelling neighborhood. Adopted this day of , 1988. Seconded by STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS~ CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) ' I, the undersigned , being the duly qualified and appointed clerk ' of the City of Maplewood Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have d the attached and -foregoing extract of minutes of a carefully compare r y regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of , 1988 with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this rezoning~ Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of v 19888 Cit Clerk, Cit of Maplewood 16 ' . . . ' ` ' 'pl annirig Commission -4- M i nute s 1 1-7-88 ' Cypress St.: Knollwood Circle (Goff Homes, Inc.) Preliminary Plat Rezoning Secretary Olson presented the staff report. Director of Public Works Ken Haider said regarding the grading of the site, the $5,000 letter of credit, in the case of default would be used to stabilize the site. There was no one from the audience who wished to comment on this request f preliminary plat d i s reque or pre m nary p a an rezoning. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission approve the Kno1lwood Circle preliminary plat, subject to the following` conditions: a. The following conditions must be met before final plat approval: 1) City staff approval of final grading erosion control utility, drainage, street and tree preservation plans. The storm sewer plan shall address the localized flooding problem that occurs in the vicinity of proposed lot one. 2> The development shall comply with the tree preservation requirements of the Environmental Protection Ordinance. At least 65 existing or newly planted trees shall be on the site when construction is complete~ 3) Submit a signed developer's agreement with the required surety for all required public improvements. 4) Correct the legal description. . b" Any grading or extraction of sand or gravel must comply with the City's mineral and soil excavations and extractions ordinance (Chapter 36, Article IV), with the following exceptions and additions: 1) Site grading within thirty feet of an adjoining property line shall not commence until all of the sand and gravel excavation activity has ceased, as determined by the City Engineer, except that no grading or excavation shall be permitted within thirty feet of the west property line. Planning Commission -5- Minutes 11-7-88 2) No noise from equipment is permitted before 8 a.m. or after 4 p.m. No activity is permitted on Saturdays, Sundays or holidays. 3) Soil material shall not be tracked onto Cypress Street or County Road C. 4) Submit a $5,000 letter of credit and a signed mineral extraction agreement to the City ' Engineer, as directed by Section 36_412 of City code. . 5) Submit a schedule for the duration of all grading and gravel extraction activity on this site. This schedule shall address erosion control v extraction rehabilitation, rough and final grading. Commissioner d B tt Sletten seconded Ayes--Ax a hl , arre , Cardinal, Dempsey, Fiola, Fischer, Larson, Sigmundik, Sletten Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission approve the resolution to rezone this site and the property adjoining to the north from F, farm residence to R-1 single dwelling. Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes--Axdahl , Barrett, Cardinal , Dempsey, Fiola, Fischer, Larson, Siqmundik, Sletten B. Code Amendment: Planning Fees ' Commissioner Sletten moved the Planning Commission recommend ' approval of the ordinance increasing planning fees app ^ ' Commissioner Cardinal seconded Ayes--Axdahl , Barrett, Cardinal , Dempsey, Fiola, Fischer, Larson, Sigmundik, Sletten C. Public Improvement Project: Holloway Avenue The staff report was presented and discussed with the commissioners. Bob Engwer, 2640 19th Avenue, North St. Paul , the originator of the petition for the street improvement, said he would like to see the improvement project approved so this property can be | developed. Ac l o by Council:, .l.nd .,L ..,d . .t .,.r .a r.- n- mzmte•a,rr MEMORANDUM nel ��++ kL + �✓ V E eLrzzrx wr. r oar rs . avrw +v To C Manager 1' From: D of Community D evelopment Subj ect: Authorization to Hire Part --time Clerk-typist El November 15, 1988 Th i,s a request to hire the part --time clerk-typist that was approved in the 1989 budget for our department. This position is being filled by a temporary employee RECCMM NDAT I ON ALAthor i z e the hiri of the pert --time clerk-typist approved by the Council in the 1989 budget. BURG T , ' ^ \ \ ` � � \ � . MEMORANDUM Ebclmr sm�______. ,�Kod _1 f i e d------- Re J eo±e d_..___. _^ ' : City Manager Thomas Ekstrand , Associate Planner SU BJECT: Plan Review and Parking-Space Authorization LOCATION: 2080 N. Rice Street APPLICANT/OWNER: Schroeder Milk Company, Inc. PROJECT: B u i l d i n g Addition DATE: November 23, 19eB SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1. The applicant is requesting approval of plans for a two~ story, 62 addition to Schroeder Milk and, also, +or approval of fewer parking spaces than code requires (79 are proposed; 105 are required). 2. The applicant is also requesting approval of a new 4,640- square-foot maintenance garage. The architectural plans, however, have not been submitted. DISCUSSION (Landscaping and Parking Authorization) Landscaping is typically required along side property lines for commercial development. Staff recommends that the landscape plan be revised to provide trees continuing east from the front of the property for beautification of the site from the Cub Foods entrance as well as from Rice Street. The applicant does not foresee an increase in employees as a result of this expansion and feels that the 79 parking spaces proposed will adequately handle their employee parking needs. Staff does not see a problem, since the applicant could add additional parking spaces if the need should arise. RECOMMENDATION Approval of plans date-stamped October 13, 1988, for the Schroeder Milk building and site expansion, subject to the following conditions: i. Authorization for fewer parking spaces than code requires, H the 79 spaces allowed do not adequately serve the applicant's parking needs, more spaces shall be provided. This revised parking plan shall be subject to Review Board approval. 7 r- Aoti on 'by C ouncilV 2. All trash dumpsters shall be stored tn screening enclosures with a 100% opaque wooden gate and shall be a color and material compatible with the building. Enclosures shall be protected by concrete-filled stesT posts, or the equivalent, anchored in the ground at the front corners of the structure. If the e.nclosure is masonry, the protective posts may be omitted. 3~ All exterior building or roo+-top equipment shall be decoratively screened and hidden from view. This screening shall be subject to Board epproval" 4° An erosion control plan, acceptable to the City Engineer, shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the grading and building permits for erosion control during construction. 5. Grading, drainage and utility plans shall be subject to the City Engineer's approval. Storm water retention shall be provided on-sits and shall not adversely affect adjacent properties. 6. All parking and driveway areas shall have bituminous paving. All parking areas shall be striped and all bituminous areas shall have continuous concrete curbing. Parking lots shall be kept in a continual state of repair" Landscaped islands within the parking lot shall also be curbed. 7 - If construction has not begun within two years of approval , Board review shall be repeated. 8. Site security lighting shall be provided and shall be directed or shielded so not to cause any undue glare onto adjacent properties or roadways. 9. If any adjacent property is disturbed or property irons removed due to construction of the site, that property shall be restored and irons replaced by the applicant. 10. The new maintenance garage shall not be constructed until the Review Board has approved the architectural plans for this building. If this building would be metal , a conditional use permit must be obtained as required by ordinance. 11. Business signage is not part of this approval . Signs shall be reviewed b staff upon application for sign permits. 12. A building address shall be installed subject to the Fire Marshal's approval . 13. The applicant shal1 submit a check for the installation of a sidewalk along the Rice Street frontage. This escrow shall be in the amount of 150% of the cost of the sidewalk installation. The escrow shall be returned to the applicant if the City Council does not require this sidewalk as part of the City's sidewalk plan. 14. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide the Cit with written documentation of their 2 obtaining an access easement from the property owner tothe north. 15. On-site fire hydrants shall b provided, subject to the Fire Marshal's approval . 16~ All old flammable liquid tanks shal l be ramoved, subject to the Fire Marshal's approval. 17" The landscape plan shall be revised for board approval to provide: an Trees along the north property line from the front of the site to the west line of the Cub Foods building. b. Trees along the south side of the southerl y truck entrance for a distance of 260 feet east of the front 1ot line. 188 All green areas shall be sodded, except for those areas behind Cub Foods and east of the site which shall be sod or seed. 19. All required landscape areas shall be continually and properly maintained. 20. All required plant materials that die shall be replaced by the owner within one year. 21. Reflectorized stop signs and two handicap parking signs shall be provided. 22. All public boulevard that is disturbed due to this construction shall be restored and resodded. 23. The dock area on the south side of the building shall be screened from Rice Street in a manner acceptable to the Review Board. 24. The applicant shall provide a monetary guarantee, in a form acceptable to staff, in the amount of 150% of the estimated Cost of any site improvements that are not completed by occupancy. 25. Approval of plans by the Community Design Review Board does not constitute approval of a building permit. 26" All fuel pumps shall be toward the rear of the site. APPEALS Any appeals of the Review Board's conditions must be made in writing to the City staff within ten days. � CITIZEN COMMENTS ' Staff mailed out questionnaires to the 29 surrounding property .owners within 350 feet for their comments. Of the 17 replies, four had no comment, 12 were in favor, and one objected. In Favor Comments 1. % am in favor +or the expansion of their personal business and increased profit--wish them much success. ~ 2. I have lived here 40 years and never had any trouble. They are wonderful people. 3w It will create more jobs in the neighborhood. 4. Sounds like a good plan helpful for economic development and business retention. 5. It would enhance Rice Street, 6. It is good for this local company and community expansion. 7. The planned use is consistent with recent developments in the area. Schroeder has been a good neighbor and should be allowed to continue to grow. 810 It will create additional jobs. We all need to have business expand in our community. 91 I am in favor because of job opportunities. If it is not done properly, I'm worried of environmental hazards. It is basically a residential neighborhood and expansion of commercial property could Jeopardize this '`atmosphere". Staff reply: All of the surrounding property is planned and zoned commercially. The only remaining residential property is across Rice Street northwest of Schroeder Milk. 10. This expansion is good, but, there is presently a lot of late-evening noise (trucks--pumping--repairing). The architect should design proper "noise barriers" around the facility to reduce both the present noise and the additional that will be created with the expansion. ' Staff reply: Staff isrecommending barrier west of the loading dock on building. This barrier should also The fact that the addition would moo` unloading area 110 feet to the east noise for the Roseville residents., that there be a visual the south side of the serve as noise abatement. ve the primary loading- should also help to reduce 4 11. Refer to the letter on page 12. -- ` f reply: The drainage and uti1it\/ plans will be subject ��o - ~ l the City Engineer's approval to ass ure no adverse affect on adjacent property owners" REFERENCE 110 Site size: gross acreage - 9.55 acres net acreage ' 6 acres 2s Ex-isting land use: Schroeder Milk plant Surrounding-Land Uses Northerl Jiff Lube Auto Center Southerly: A single dwelling on commercial property owned by the applicant Easterly: Undeveloped commercial property W esterly: Rice Street. West of Rice Street is commercial property in the City of Roseville. Past Actions � 11-18-76: Council approved a special exception for Schroeder Milk. 1-13-77: Council approved a building addition. . 4-24-79: The Board approved a 40-by 64-foot storage building at the rear of the property. 7-28-81x The Board approved a 70-by 90-foot cooler addition. 7-11-83x Council waived a construction moratorium for Schroeder Milk to construct a 26-by 68-foot freezer addition. ' 9-25-84: The Board approved two 29-foot-tall tanks at the north e/ of the building. . 10-23-84x The Board approved a 33-+oot resin silo at the southwest corner of the building. 3-25-85: Council amended the Land Use Plan for this property from RH, high density residential, to SC, service commercials � Plannin Land use plan designation: SC 28. Zoning: BC, business commercial Ordinance re Subsection 36-153 (a) re a conditional use permit for processing and distribution stations for milk or other beveragess Subsection 36-22 (a) re that provided based upon usage and flooi authorized b the Cit Council: Office One space for Manufacturing One space for Warehousing One space for the following parking be area, unless otherwise each 200 s feet each 400 s feet each 1,000 s feet Public Safet The +ol lowing provided or accompl ished: in On-site fire h 2n An automatic fire suppression s 3n Proper addressing of the building 4n Old flammable li tanks should be removed. Public Works in The final grading, drainage and utilit plans shall be submitted for the Cit Engineer's approval* 2 is The grading, as proposed, would re that the sanitar sewer be replaced. it Attachments in Location Map 2. Propert Line/Zoning Map 3a Site Plan reduction 4a Building elevations reduction 5-4 Parking code waiver re 6a Letter from-James Dean (adjacent propert owner) i i irri (`t W 0 n, �t u3 MAN - LOCATION '• SA /N r Attachment 1 k� I r 61 h � H �t.77 mss.. tip � O N 0 N IL s a+ O � � �� � �� �� � �. �� � � �� � � r r � � r ��� � QI� ..Y� �� err � �► i� i �� �. PROPERTY LINE" / ZONING MAP 8 Attachment 2 Q N 'Cab Feeds It m ap, 0 rr . _---� OP A- 1 •� i sum ,ham T she If Toi?1t. yrtf I=A-s Zo AGE -G& em Existing Building , �rw,�s �carrrrt: �,�sf tz�b� Pro osed Addition p vow- dAW rem lk tl \ It m ap, 0 rr . _---� OP A- 1 •� i sum ,ham T she If Toi?1t. yrtf I=A-s Zo AGE -G& em Existing Building , �rw,�s �carrrrt: �,�sf tz�b� Pro osed Addition p =40 Az wommulmosompWil maim 4C WJ in fit, T j I JIM ll IV, 14 '!�7 � 1: ) R • T' �T, Vi R,�;. F! fil li!i i "�llll U f l IAJMJL�r Mw -1 -4 A MI T A- 1411M TT � ,,., ����i, ��I.� :.�' }L j ,1 7 , i1 � t ;1 -; l> C ����� ����� �� ..�f� +�� , .,��., I �'t: ��'�j: -��� � O) � +s f i 0 :; = i 7* �100 fall ims of �111111'���u ���. iillllt''1'���� MIT Ti�IJ; iftl�ICl `i���iiGflt� m - r . 1 , T." -, il = 771; mm EE1WVA",fl • oftoot elk.; A-4 1,14. WoUgramlKnutson Architects Ltd ]� p� ehaha Avenue South November 9, 1988 Mr. Tom Eckstrand City of Maplewood Community Development 1830 E. Co. Rd. B Maplewood, Mn. 55109 Re: Schroeder Milk Co. Dear Mr. Eckstrand, Telephone Minneapolis 612/1 24 -1916 Minnesota 55406 Per our conversation of today, I would like to confirm that the parking area as designed for the Schroeder Milk Co. plant expansion has been designed for the peak anticipated employment during normal business hours, plus shif t overlap between day and evening hours. It is our opinion that the 79 car parking lot, plus 39 semi- trailer trucks, will adequately provide parking during all courses of normal operation, and that a larger parking area would be underutilized. However, if this is not acceptable per City requirements, please notify our office of the proper requirement, so that we may make the necessary change. Vi� cerely, o fgram /Knutson te s, �I � a Crag D. olfgram A. . cc: Bob Schroeder, Schroeder Milk Co. 11 Attachment 5 4t "O p at z z ..B i'ZO i�/� �y �/ �j„�C CG� APO 1000, �ja�rv�i�ee� �� . , -7 F /7'a1✓ ��i1'� eo, 12 Attachment MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA . NOVEMBER 29 1988 I. CA L TO ORDER Cha rman Moe cal 1 ed the meeting to orde at 7 :00 p .m . II. ROLL ALL Donald oe Present Tom Dean Present Jim k Ochs • ek Absent Roger An i t b erg e r Presen Marvin .Eric • son Prese III APPROVAL OF M MUTES As October 25 1988 The Board amended Item V . B. (Maplewood Con ven i en c e Center) . Item 11 . wa omitted and Item. 20 was reworded. Board Member An i tz be er moved approval of the minutes of October 25, 1989. Beard Member Erick on _ conded Ayes_--a1 1 B. November 1 988 Board Member Lie ns moved t e minutes of November be approved as ubm i tted . Board Member rick son second d Ayes--all 1 Iva AP'P'ROVAL. OF GENDA Board Memb Er i ci %e son moved the genda be approved as submitted. Board hie er Leans seconded yes --- all V. UNF THIS ED BUSINESS via DESIGN REVIEW A . B u i l d i n g Addition - Schroeder M i l i% Coo 2080 N. Rice Street Craig Wolf gram , Wolf gram Knutson Architects (representing Schroeder Milk Co .) , asked the Board to c 1 ar i f y Number 5 of the staff recommendation regarding the retention of Community Design Review Board �2- Minutes 11-29~88 storm water on-site. Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish explained the requirements necmessary. Bob Schroeder inquired about the City of St. Paul's involvement with provisions of holding ponds= - Mr, kVolfgrasm asked what the amount required for escrow for the installation of sidewalks would be. Secretary Ekstrand said the Engineering Department would be able to estimate the construction costs. Mr. Wol+gram also asked for details of where fire hydrants would be required. Secretary Ekstrsxnd said this question should be addressed to the Fire Marshal. Board Member Erickson moved: Approval of plans date-stamped October 13, 1988, for the Schroeder Milk building and site expansion, subject to the following conditions: 1. Authorization for fewer parking spaces than code requires. If the 79 spaces a1lowed do not adequately serve the applicant's parking needs, more spaces shall be provided. This revised parking plan shall Se Subject to _Review Board approval. 2. All trash dumpsters shall be stored in screening enclosures with a 100% opaque wooden gate and shall be a color and material compatible with the building. Enclosures shall be protected by concrete-filled steel posts, or the equivalent, anchored in the ground at the front corners of the structure. If the enclosure is masonry, the protective posts may be omitted, 3. All exterior building or roof-top equipment shall be d eecoratively scr and hidden from view. This screening shall be subject to Board approval. A. An erosion control plan acceptable to the City Engineer, shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the grading and building permits for erosion control during constructicon. ` 5, Grading, drainage and Utility plans shall be subject to the City Engineer's approval. Storm water retention ' shall be provided on-site and shal1 not adversely affect adjacent properties. 6. All perking and driveway areas shall have bituminous paving. All parking areas shall be striped and all bituminous areas shall have continuous concrete curbing. community .Design Review Board --3- Ni Parking lots shall be kept in a continual state 'of repair. Landscaped islands within the parking lot shall also+be curbeds 7a I+ construction has not -begun within t . wo y ears o+ approvals Board review shall be r BW Sit securit lighting shall be provided and shall be directed or shielded so not to cause an u ndue g lare onto adjacent properties or roadways. 90 !+ an adjacent property is disturbed or property irons removed due to construction of the site, that propert shall be restored and irons replaced b the. applicants 1.0. The new maintenance g arage shall not be constructed until the Review Board has approved the architectural plans for this buil ding o If this building would be metals a conditional use permit must be obtained as re b ordinance. 11, BUSiness si is not part of this approvals Signs shall be reviewed b staff upon application for si permitso uilding address shall be installed subj ect to the A b Fire Marshal's approval 1.3. The a pplicant shall submit a checle for the installation o+ a sidewalk alonca the Rice Street +rontage. This escrow shall be in the amount of .150% of the cost of the sidewalk installations The escrow shall be returned to the a pplicant if the C it y Council does not s sidewal k re this sidewalk as part of the City' p an 1.4. Prior to the issuance of a building p e rmit the applicant shall provide the Ci with written documentation of their obtaining an access easement from the propert owner to the northip 15, On-site -fire h shall be provided, subject to the Fire Marshal's approvals 16. All old flammable li tanks shall be removed, subject to the Fire Marshal 15 approval a 17s . The I andscape P an shal 1 be revised for Board approval to provide: Communit Design Review Board Minutes 11-29-88 a Trees along the north property I ine from the front of the site to the west I ine of the Cub Foods building M= b so Trees along the south side of the southerl y truck entrance for a distance of 260 feet e'a st 0+ the front lot lines ii is, All green areas sha 11 be sodded, except for those areas behind Cub Foods and east of the si te which shal I be sod or seed 19. All re landscape areas shall be continually and properly maintainede 20. All re plant materials that die shall be replaced b the owner within one y ears Jgns and two handicap park- ing 21. Reflectorized stop sL signs shall be provided* 22. Al I public bout evard that is disturbed due to -this construction shall be restored and resoddeds 3. The dock area on the south side of the building shall be screened from Rice Street- in a manner accep Cab li e to the Review Board 24, The applicant shall provide a monetary guarantee, in. a form acceptable to staff in the amount of 15.0% of the estimated cost of an site improvements that are not comp= eted b occupancy 25 Approval of plans b the Communit Design Review .R.- a H oerr; does not const . itute approval of a building permit. 26. Al 1 fuel pumps shat I be toward the rear of the site . Board Member Anitzberger seconded A B, Plan Rev* Maplewood Housi g.Ap art ments Gervais Aven Linda Fischer, reps enting BY Partnerships said thr-- app Icant was in agre en with al I of the conditions of the staff recommendat io - Ms. Fischer did ask far clarification on the co endations, concerning the public trail easeme and t e bus stop and shel ter ia Board Member Elea s moved appro I of p an date-stamped November IS 1, 8, subject to th following conditions: . \ ` MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: DATE: INTRODUCTION City Manager Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Plc Street Plan Revision West of the Mall December 5, 1988 Acti'mz by Oouncil�' E - n dor s e�_�~��~��. M o d �f �edL�~�~��= Rejecte City staff is requesting that the City Council revise the previously approved street plan for the area west of the Mall . Reason for the E,,' On September 24, 1984, the City Council adopted guidelines for future streets in this area. Council required that there be an east-west street connecting Hazelwood Avenue and the Maplewood Mall ring road and that there be access to this street from the Korstad and Hajicek properties. Council also required that Kennard Street be aligned as shown on page 4. The developers of the Maplewood Crossing Shopping Center are proposing that Kennard Street be extended straight north and the east-west street be built in the HaJicek property when it develops. See page 5. DISCUSSION The proposed straight alignment of Kennard Street will properly serve all adjacent properties. The future east-west street was conceptually planned to lie between the Maplewood Crossing's site (formerly William Korstad's property and Robert HaJicek's land to the north. This east-west street is not needed for Maplewood Crossings and would best be placed to the north within Mr. Hajicek's land in a manner to serve future buildings within his property. The exact alignment for this street, of course, cannot be determined until Mr. Hajicek has a specific development RECOMMENDATION The guidelines for street development between the Maplewood Mall and Hazelwood Avenue shall be revised as follows (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): The fol I owing streets shou4•6 shat 1 be incl Uded in development p an for the area a V::ennard Street Map 4-ewood-West- Bott+evatmd from et-+east Beam Avenue to M rm0pet't y Count Road D. eoumt y -Rmad-B-ma -the -e ity -prov ideci -t�r&t tr&+++c-f tmnm-Mtm 8-1 6 -i-str+ but ed -Av en "-& - -Map+- ewood -West b » A q%...o hlawn Drive from Beam AvenLAe to COUnt Road El x e e S 4F _jMeMt ,5* U C An east-west street(s) connecting Ham elwood AvenUe and the Maplewood Mall ring road. + 2w Specific alignments will,be determined at the time that devel opment pl ans are SUbmitted to the Cit e1- ig n ments -4-otm - & -Mapi-ewnod -West -Bn" -T-ev&rd -amd-an -e&4n t -n tree t -to- the-m&4--)--r -i-mg-road-acme- epprnved -I-Ows -4p i-&M lorr-f t* M& e"Culed- West- Bcu: evftrd i-tneler-Ho mart eet-f rom-•hre i1 Attachments 11 Locat i on 2. Approved 3 , Maplewood Map Street Concept Plan Crossings Site Plan oqis Iyt /u/Y i 4> RD D" 0 t� _ ' G q. K AV 1 or .1 0 - --q LAIR K J CO o R D c LELAND i JUNCTION 113M ST rKl � 0WESSAW AVJ NORTH S�4 AV y LOCATION MAP '• 3 Attachment 1 WHI TE BEAR LAK 1 :. N v 77�� J Cr 41 c WOODLYNN AV FURW C TFS AV AV n 23 „ 4 N r -- 0 70. counli Do&* a 4w A h R pl • • + 1 lak MOP IF 1101ILL AML_ s ..Ww o - .. 1 . „, �. • mow• evil—. 117 We 1 s NNW .. I 1� 1 1 i , • v • _ q1 t • X00'• • Aopre•t SCAT e � • • ' f T STUDY FOR NAPLXW000'1(E$t AREA WILLIAM i KORSIAO . BENSHOOF AND ASSOCIATES ww.MNtM � � tw.• •rA ty..t t../ f». •bM• t COUNCIL APPROVED KENNARD STREET ALLIGNMENT Wee 40 • 7 a t S ion b Counci ej . S S A! L T y.� .7 � t -1EM0R sND1�t 1 p �° ' TO.: C i t y Manager Rej ec te - EROM : D i r• e.c. t cer• of Commu n i t De' I.) e l oilme t Date SUBJECTS Moratorium can Gas. Sa LATE : November 30, 1 988 REQUEST Cbunc i l member• Bastian requested an opinion from the pl commi as to whether the City should establ i sh a moratorium on the construction of net &i gay. pumps, The purpose of the moratorium t.1ou l d be to give the Ci time to study whether additional r e s t r i c t i o n s - ; should be placed on the location and deg. i ,fin of n et.�f ryas pumps. Council member Bastian is particularly concerned R*%t i t h the area around the Mall and on White Bear Avenue, BACKGROUND- le There are the same number of motor fuel suctions in the City today as them viere in 1 986 when the last survey E %ias done -• 1 9 . Th are, h t . 1 , , t e v e r ' , f i v e stations, that are proposed or are under. construction. ( Refer to the attached map.) 2. The City's motor fuel station code wa.s adapted in 1967 and is out-o+-date. The industry has sh ifted from fu l l - -�ery i ce gas stations to convenience retail stores. with Qas gales and no or minor repair fac i l i t es. Nei ;si City ordinances and com i t ;r desi revi beard s tandar ds hav a1 so m ade the mot fu s t a t i o n c ode obsol The Cit C o n s i d e r e d c han Qes t t h i s code in 1 980 " . 0 No final action was taken, 3a In 1 987, the Ci amended the LGC, Limited Servi Corrimer•c ial desi in the comprehensive plan to a.l l olk! gas --a l e� , provided that ther ar• e no more than tt/tiio ga di on on i w. l an d . 4. Motor fuel stations are permitted only in EC, Busi C o m m ' er c i a l zones or M-1, L i g h t M a n u f a c t u r i n g zo nes. A conditional use permit is requ ired if the M -1 zone is designated on the Cit land u se plan for LGC use. Motor fuel s t a t i o n s may a l s o be approved as part of a planned unit development. DISCUSSION The C i t Chou l d not trY to 1 imi t the number• of motor• fuel s tat i one. based on their number. This decision should be left t the market place, The Ci should, however, revise and update the motor fuel station code to assure that new stations are safe and compatible w t adiacent land uses. R E C OMM EIS DAT I CM 1 . E s t a b l i s h a moratorium on new applications for motor fuel s t a t i o n s , exce'pt' for a CDRB application at the Lower Afton' Road and McKnight goad p r o j e c t , which has a current PUE) a pplication , 1 The project a t Wh - i , t o Bear Al %, e *n u e and 11th A ., en u e would be w.0 b j ec t to the m6rator i um, since their cApp l i cwt i can i. s incomplete -- it lacks. the required petition . 2. Direct staff to revise and update the City's motor fuel .tat i on code GO/GASSALE Attachment: maps MOTOR FUEL STATIONS W m W W W W 41 ��/ o a o 0 0 0 Cit @1111 C "' ' D o E a F d a H I N J N K $ N� ty of Mapl ood a and JA•d MNd I I I I ( n I ( I I t" l WfO rt 81W LANE 1 --rc:- I� • 1............. 1 1 L full* SCALZ M10MA/d N[1r.NrJ 3120 N. Q �, 3120 N. • LEGEND INTERSTATE TRUNK NKIN•MY - - - - .. - . - - . - - _ .. - - ® 1 1 t U.{ NUMStRtO tNUNK NOMAY - - - 1 J • ,� , •i STATE NuMSEREO TRUNK 14"WAY - .... - - - - - -Q v 1 �` IS •• t ; Y I ' _ M COUNTY STATE Alp mommy ------- .. - - -0 2 �' - - `- 1 ` : S�4 O " 2880 N. COUNTY ROAD . -O �� _ i. •�._� r i'• 11.. • • xa 1j1� COUNTY tTATt AID NNINMAY 114 AOJOINRNS COUNTY - - -1 S 1 ^ •� f t I 1 COUNTY "AD IN ADJOINW COUNTY - - - - - - - - - - ...� I j ; / r � � / • 41 d -. •i ; I � ,. I v A...,..A...` 1 1 .I.r• iw i ' •ten• ' CORPORATE LIMITS - - - - - - - - - - - - •• -' ... -. • -�j.�. ��l .� l a t 1 a,j Y :!�! ••' -'• ~ - 1 - A•OAIN SAU PAUL 2640N.� - s E J 1 2640N. 3 v O O n� • I L g A o 8 c ', -- & X existing 3 1 , 10 n .• t. s ... / M l r 1 � p•w" , I tS �T • Wow" Ilr � ! � t Ct �� • r Fe 2400N. --- _ A _ - 2400 N. F to p = proposed 11.•,... tArrtr CANADA \ - ~• ► t • • 2160 N. @ ` 2160 N. � AWOL 1 � • 1 AoomrN SANNr PAUL ► u �1 � n i• w t 1920N. T ! +� / - ~ 1920 N. y S • Ma `' Jf •. w .• � • 1 • n.ew w � = C � • • i � t ! 1 a -. IN :....� IS '1 1680N. • (6) �c:• l all l ��,` t 16e0 N SAImr •w..• Nn r 'r . • 1 •r T ..1 1.1 .,a•• w 111 .•••a• n ' , � I 1pW 11'• M Irl 'N ., • � 1 7 �.n.t i'r A W 8 w) C W D w+ E f C •e C H o 14401 ° •�..L -- 14401 CIL 0 O 0 W N 0 h Q ••, M � •?� t �..r riiaiw O •r1 h O i .� • L t STREET INDEX 12001 ,.1 t 12° °N, 1 r� . r I 1 • ABEL ST. A FLAWDRAU 8T. H -3 TO 6 MARY9Ii0L1. AVE. H -3. 6 1 T ADELS ST. r-6 FOREST ST. 9-3 MATER L.A. L -13 1 t • • so, ADOLPHUS ST. 2 -51 6 F RANK CT. r -1 "AYH 1 LL RD. L-10. 13 9601 i ' • - - 9601. AGATE ST. B-6 rRANK ST. F -1. 6 McA1FIS CSR. 0-4 ALLEN PL. D-6 rRSDERICK PKWY J -1 NcCLILLAND ST. L -13. 17 x .; ""`••�`" 'ARCADE ST. g -2 TO 6 FREDERICK ST. J -2 MCKAIGHT A J. K -1. 2. 6. 7. A11191, ST. J - 1 , 3 FICHONT, Avg. L -11 S. 10 TO 19 10 • ' 10 ARKNRI011T BT. C - S, 6 rRIllUlt AYR. r A WWXNKMT •T. FJ 4. 'J. 6 r ' ATLANTIC $T. r -4. S. 6 rRUOT Avg. r. 0. H -S MEAI)OvL"K LA. rUNNRGU ST. J-10 at • MRYKR CT. N. R•1 - ' IS. COUNTY RD. A TO J - 4 MEYER 8T. K 1201 BARCLAY ST. 0 -3 TO 6 GALL AVg. K -1 MIC HAXL I.A. L -10 • `) �.....�• BARTELNY LA. 9-10 90 10 OEM ST. H -2 MIDVALI PL. L-9 BEAN AVE. t TO K -1 OIRANIUM Avg. L -9 MINNg1/ANA Avg. K. L-10 IA ✓� BEAUMONT BT. A-6 GERMAIN ST. H -3. 4 MI091891PP1 ST. 6-3 11 w_ ( •v Ii BEEBE PXWY. J 0IRNAU4 ST. 1 -4 MONTANA Avg. K -7 ;3)W C � •,,•• ;: t BE66E AD. +` J J-6 OERVAIB AVg. g TO I -3 MORIILANO CT. K -16 99LLAIRS Avg- X -1 OIRVAIS CT. 1 -3 WT. Vg"00 Avg. 6. Co D-3 � �i' BELLWOOD Avg. Be Co D-6 GLENDON ST. L -91 10 MTRTLt CT. K - 4801. - 4601. 13ILHONT LA. D. F. 0 -5 GORDON 8T. r-6 KTMZ ST. K -4, 7 P . O . 1 J 1'Nt BIRMINGHAM ST. 0 -4. S. 6 GRANDVIEW AVE. 0. H -4 - ?I ti } i:::.' y ' R •"� � 1 it BITTERSWEET LA. H -3 OREIHBRINR ST. 0-3 NEBRASKA Avg. 1 -7 .LJ�• •t► 1t.r: �_tir•� BRADLEY 8T. c - 3. 6 12 • 1,,' . �• =:. j OULOtIi PL 0-4 sg2t1T3: Avg. K -1• BRAND ST. K. L -10 OURNSY $T, A-4 N. $T. PAUL RD. 1-4 BRENNER AVg. K - 1 s BRAMW00D CURVE 9-1 HARRIS Avg. H -3 OAK Hato"" CT. 9-16 "► 1 lose BROOKS AVE. 0. H -3 HARVESTER Avg. K, L -10 OAKRIDG9 DR. 9-16 BROOKS CT. 9 -3 HAWTHORNK AVg. L -8 O'Day CSR. L -17 2401• .,.�.,,. 1 ® 2401 BROOKVIEW CT. L -13 HAZEL ST. 1 -4. 6 O'Day $T. L -13, 13 TO 16 _ �,. BROOKVIZV DR. K, L -13 HAZELWOOD ST. at H -1 TO 6 on AICRiBT CT. 8 1, BURXE Avg D, r, 0. H -'J HEIGHTS AVg. 1 -19 ONACRXST CURYs 6-t IS 13 BURR ST. C -41 3. 6 HENDRY PL. C-4 OVERLOOK CIR. 1-19 M BUSH AVE. K -10 HENRY LA. 9 -190 20 NN. HIGHPOINT CURVE 1 -15 PALM CIR. 9 -3 C. COUNTY RD. it TO I -2 HIGHWAY DR. C -4 r ALN CT. 9 . •„ ! - CAREY HEIGHTS DR. r -1 HILLTOP CT. r -3 FARAWAY DR. Do E-4 00 - r--- -- -00 CARLTON ST. L -11 HIOHWOOD Avg. K. L -17 PATN9 AVE► D-4. S. 6 1 CARVER AVE. K, L-19 HILLWOOD DR. 1 -16 PMALXX PL. r-6 CASI AVE. K -9 HOLLOWAY A is K, L -3 PHYLIS CT. E -17 CASTLE AVg. 1-4 HOWARD CT. J -1 FCND AVE. K. L -13 14 14 CENTURY AVE. L -I TO 20 HOWARD 8T. J -11 6 PRICE avg. D. 0. 1-6 CHAMBERS 8T. F -3 HUDA30H PL. K. 16-13. 13 PR08P911TT RD. H-4. 3. • CHIPPEWA AYE.. K - 1 HUDSON RD. K, 1. CHIPPEWA CIF♦ X RADATZ AVL I. J - t _240S. CHIPPKWA CT. N. 1 -1 IDAHO Avg. L -7 RICI $T. A -30 6 CHISHOLM PKWY. J-1 IDg ST. 0 -3, IS RIPLtY AVL C. r. 0. to J. K-4 CITY HEIGHTS DR. B-6 IVY AVg. L-8 ROBE Avg. L •- 2 18 CLARENCE ST. O -2. 3. 3. 6 ROBgLAVU AVE. A. a. C, D-3 15 6 s 1• CLARK ST. C -4. S JACKSON ST. A-$, • R06gV000 AVg. a H -S r COMMON AVE. g• r -3 JAMES DR. L -13 ROSEWOOD AVL S. H -S CONIOR CT. 5 JISBIg BT. C-6 Rm ST. 480 S. I-6 • « "' CONWAY AVg. K, L-11 JUNCTION AVg. F-4 RYAN AVL r. 0-3 4805 - $ COPE AVE. r, 0. H. I -4 Is COPS CT. r KELOM PKWY. 9-20 30 4 SAINT JOHN$ BLVD. "-1 _ CRAIG PL. 1 -4 KENNARD ST. H -1. 7 TO • BANDIIURST AVL O. H """ t CRESTVIEW DR. X -130 180 160 16 KtNWOOD DR. a. D-3. 6 SCHALLER DPI. K - 17 Id 18 CNKST'VIaw rORSBT DR. L -16 KSNWOOD DR. M. D -S. • $RAALN &T. D•4 r� DORRIS CT. 9 -17 KKNWOOD LA. D -6 Ssys1JTH INT. K, L - 10 " CURRIR BT, K RING AVE- 9 SSXTANT AVg. 0. N -I p -« CURVE 8T• 0 KINGSTON AVg. A. co D. 1 -6 SNERRIN Avg. 0. 1 -4 T20s.- r ---- -- ..r. ' 5 CY BT. g -3 KNOLL CIR. L-• $HtYgR AVg. r -3 �. KOHLMAN AVE. V. G. 1 -2 SKILLMAN AVL U. C. D. ►. 0 -! , '1N� ... �" D, COUNTY RD. t TO L -1 KOHLMAN CT. 9-2 BLOAN PL. 6 r tr ~ DA1HL AVg. K -17 K014LMAM LA. 9 -2 BLOM ST. 9-3 IT ; ��r... � IT DAHL CT. K -17 SXOWSHOt LA. K -17 t N DAY RD. r -4 LAKS BLVD. L -I SOPHIA ATE. r. 0-6 ►+ •� DEMONT AVg. N. H -3 LAKE ST. L-1 $OOTHCRKBT AVL K -Ie ��� " •, DENNIS LA. L -13 SODUTHLAWN DR. H -2. 3 -_. _- I,AKEW000 OR. K -1. •. 7, 9. 9603. ' -- 960 S DENNIS 8T. L -8 101 16. 17. 1• SPRINOBIDS DR. 9-16 DgSOTO ST. C -4, S. 6 LAKEWOOD CT. X-17 STANDRIDGg AVL IL K -1 DIETER ST. 0-5. 6 LARK Avg. C. r. O. M -4 STAI1111091009 PL. X - 1 R .DORLAND RD. K -1. 15. 16. 19 I,ARPENTIUR AVE. A TO 0. r TO L-4 STAN ICM CT. 1-3 18 S I� -"� ` 18 DOWNS AVg. 8 -$ LAURIE RD. C. 0. H. I -4 STANICH PL. 1-6 I 1 DULUTH ST. r-3 6 LEE ST. D-S GTANICH BT. I-4 T / ,- LELAND RD. r -4 STERLING ST. K. L-A, 7. 9, 10. 13. MAST SHORE DR. g, r LINDKM LA. 9 -2 13. 17 TO 20 -•'• I �►;.. EDGEHILL RD. H LINWOOD AVE. X. L -1• BTILLVA AVL K -10 12003 .. 1200 S SDOXMONT BT. C-6 LINWOOD CT. K -17 STiLtYATtR RD. R. L -9. 10 V ''•. '� iDOtRTON ST. C -4. b• • LONDIN I.A. K. L -13 BUM"" Avg. 6. O. H♦ EDITH ST. L -10 LOWER AFTON RD. K. L -13 SUMRIes CT. C-6 (9 19 EDWARD ST. r -1. 6 LYDIA AYE. 1. J. g. L-1 SUNRISE DR. C-4 ': ELDRIDGE Avg. C. D. 0 =3 BILTAX BT. A-• 1 • ^+' / ELEVENTH AVg. I -3 MAGNOLIA AVL K-4 I •J i ELM 8T. 0 -2 MAILANQ RD. K. L -13 TEAKWOOD CT. K -16 \\ 14401. �, ' - 14404 ENGLISH ST. 0-2 TO 6 MAM19 AVS. 1 -16 TgAKWOOD DR. L -16 NVAR 8T. L-40 10 MANTON ST. 0 -30 • TI Man T'L K -17 MAPLE I.A. J. K -1 ( , FARRELL ST. L - 11. 13 MAPLZVISW AVL J -2 UPPXX AFTON RD. 1. L -130 14 ( . FENTON ST. A. F MAPLEWOOD DR. L F. 0-1 TO • 20 1 1 20 rg"DALi 8T. L-6 TO 110 13, MARGARET AVg. L -11 VALLST VIEW AVL K. L -17 1 1 I 17. 16 MARNIS ST. X -13, I•. 1S VALLET VISV CT. 1-17 r1rT11 AVg. L -I1 MARY CT. N. K -1 VA�Dyit ST. 1-2. 4. 3. • _� _N►AMKY Nro 1 rITCN RD. G -J MARY BT. K -l. 7. 1. 10. iS V IKIMO OR. D. 0. H -4 18803 ITASrtuvi7LM� co - - - - -- -- - �--- - - -lee° 3 MARYLAND AVE. K. L -• ® WALTUX BT. r WVITS BEAR ATg, 1-1 TO • MIN2 40P tm. 4 -1 I + I VOODLYNR AVg. 1• alt E• 10- / ' l � MEMORANDUM TO: FROM,: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: PROJECT TITLE: DATE: City Manager Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Rezoning Initiation White Bear Avenue and 11th Avenue Amoco 03.1 Company White Bear Avenue Partnership Amoco Fuel Station December 5, 1988 SUMMARY / -- - ._-- 'Action by Counbtll Mod 'if 0 1��--~�~�_� Re The applicant is requesting that the City Council accept their rezoning application without the required petition signed by 507. of the surrounding property owners within 200 feet. The application is for an Amoco fuel station and car wash building. Refer to the letter on page 6 . The applicant is also applying for an amendment of the comprehensive plan LSC, limited service commercial to SC, service commercial . Elescri of the Pr The proposed project includes a 1,462-square-foot service building, a 795-square-foot car wash building, and fuel islands. Reason for the Re.q_L�est The applicant has not been able to obtain the required number of signatures for the submittal of his rezoning application. The zone change application cannot be processed without this waiver. ALTERNATIVES 1. Denial of the request, thereby, requiring the applicant to obtain the signatures in order for the City to accept the application. 2. Waiver of the petition requirement. DISCUSSION There are two reasons why the City Council should not initiate this rezoning: 1. Council is considering a moratorium on motor fuel stations in order to revise and update the City's motor fuel station ordinance. One of the requirements would be at least a 200- foot setback for underground fuel tank vents from a residential zone. This site could not meet this requirement since it is only 185 feet wide. The City required this setback of the Tom Thumb station at Larpenteur Avenue and McKnight Road. Staff required it of Menard's. It is also being recommended for a proposed fuel station at McKnight and Lower Afton Roads. 2. The rezoning is not consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. RECOMMENDATION Denial of the Amoco Oil Company's request for City Council initiation of their zone change on the basis that: 1. The City Council is considering a moratorium on motor fuel stations. One of the requirements being considered is a 200-foot setback from a fuel tank vent to a residential zone. This site could not meet this requirement. 2. The rezoning is not consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. kd/TEAMOCOZC 11 Land Use Plan Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 34 Site Plan 4. Applicant's Letter dated November 3, 1988 5. Plans (separate enclosure) N Interchange Vadnais Heights i 1 � I . f t i r Ialor collectort - • • 3 � _ B I _ -44M L --� t•. CW I i odd. SC LSC Bw II* ctQr6 .. •� ._ :0S Major colie 9 Mnnumlf >m >: Q cc m M O Z Intorchnng© major 0 aillot nu s it L collect -` r to � A Ow 2 L min or` -a _L%_ ., 'C -WSJ -' -� oS .IM C 0§1 t r 7 RL S _ tic Ls ,. . RL c. r ha ge { HAZELWOOD LAND USE PLAN 3 Attachment 1 cc 0 0 c w m m c — o ' V L E Q cc m M O Z Intorchnng© major 0 aillot nu s it L collect -` r to � A Ow 2 L min or` -a _L%_ ., 'C -WSJ -' -� oS .IM C 0§1 t r 7 RL S _ tic Ls ,. . RL c. r ha ge { HAZELWOOD LAND USE PLAN 3 Attachment 1 PROPERTY LINE"l ZONING MAP 4 Attachment 2 i • X101.61.0 Plot 1A%G10SIt-PLT SITE PLAN Attachment 3 4 i L: a i -- — — — — — — — — — — — - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 �========= = == _===== = = === == == ==== ====== = = = = = M AVEMJE * L= -7' • • 0 40 • 54&ir aoo2T3r E 2U36 ft 60573 — C T — 3 — M - 77 — to 41C 0. QL C CPO w wo W � 3. J ; 1 �� � � L it g� � Li � 1 7 4 , 00 ,1000 Oil LoT S i �" I AM Li 44 �51 s ow 2 451 S SW WTI Owl 2 2M 31• S 002W3r IN mot 3 asoww w 81TE DATA LOT AREA LOTI 'W"" • OF I" AM LOT a &%&" W. US AM DOM TOTAL 99.20" SP. 229 AM ANOW CIL COWAW AM W. 00r" If RINI @I= 00 BUILDING AFAEA SERVICE CENTER U82.1 OF. M UAXXNQMK w G"w Now CARWASH 79" W. t7% 10�MJL004 CANOPY FOOTPFINT 244&0 OF. US 4706.1 8F. 10.811 MOWN INTPA 8011111111113"41 CAM UMM M =ft IL MAA" LAW. MU= IN LAMMCAPM PROVIM 9.97" OF. MAS " K M Ift"y IM" PARI( REOUM U SPACES PROVIM ZOMM 2 SPACES rWK WM PLAN Oft 30M E)GSTM TO- FARM RESKMNCE COTFACT AhKM CIL CO PAW • PROPOS• ••- MAM38 AND UM AWL + MAPUEWOOD. MN SITE PLAN Attachment 3 4 1L i 1 0 , - W-r Don L. Clark District Manager November 3, 1988 Mayor & City Council City of Maplewood 1380 Front Ave. Maplewood, MN 55109 Attn : Tom Ekstrand Associate Planner Amoco SS# 3606 White Bear Ave. & 11th Maplewood, MN Gentlemen: Amoco Oil Company Twin Cities District Southgate Office Plaza, Suite 890 5001 West 80th Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55437 612- 831 -3464 Writers direct dial number (612) 831 -7520 Amoco has filed for among other items for site plan approval a re- zoning request for the S.E. corner of White Bear Ave. & 11th Ave. This letter is to request waiver of this petition requirement at this time so the project may proceed. The reasons are as follows. The property south of the subject is under control and is for sale as commercial property. It is our understanding that several of these owners will not sign for or against.rezoning of the two corner parcels as they wish for the entire block to be considered as on re- zoning effort. We believe this is some whatof a hostage effort as we can not proceed without either their signatures or your wavier of this petition. There are 22 parcels surrounding our site. We currently have 8 signatures and 2 or 3 more are being sought via m a i l . Amoco will continue to obtain the required signatures, however we wish to proceed at this time. Your consideration of our request to wave petition at this time is truly appreciated. Yours Tr , C.L. Kristufe Business Devel ent Representative cc: North Star Engineering Baldwin Reality Attachment 4