Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988 10-24 City Council PacketAGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7 :00 P.M., Monday, October 24, 1988 Municipal Administration Building Meeting 88 -26 (A) CALL TO ORDER (B) ROLL CALL (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES (D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA (E) CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Claims Z. Conditional Use permit Renewal and Revision: 1810 County Road B (Fulk Manufacturing) 3. Time Extension: Maidment Terrace Preliminary Plat 4. Disposal of Old Fariancial Records 5. Final Payment - 1988 Overlay Project (F) PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7 :10 P.M., Preliminary Plat: 'Woodlynn Heights Townhomes No. 3 2. 7 :20 P.M. PUD Revision: Larpenteur Avenue and McKnight Road (Hillside Center) 3. 7 :30 P.M., Street Vacation: English Street 4. 7 :40 P.M., Torgerson Addition a. Preliminary Plat b. Utility Routing Approval C. Half -width Street Variation d. Cul -de -sac Variation (G) AWARD OF BIDS (H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Code Amendment: Residential Garage Size (2nd Reading - 4 Votes) 2. Conditional Use Permit or Variance: 834 McKnight Road (Hayes) _(H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS (Continued) 3. Code Amendment: On Site Sewage Treatment (2nd Reading - 4 Votes) 4. 5. 6. Tax Exempt Financing Requirements Cope Avenue Assessment Appeal Gervais Avenue - Truck Restriction (I) NEW BUSINESS 1. PUD Time Extension and Revision of Conditions: Beaver Creek Apts, 2. HRA /HRC Commissioner Liaison 3. Holloway - Schedule Public Hearing 4. Gall Avenue - Lot Split Appeal (J) VISITOR PRESENTATIONS (K) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (L) ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS (M) ADJOURNMENT Agenda. Number E -1. Action by Council Endorse AGENDA REPORT,�,�� _ T Re j e0, t, t TO: FROM: RE DATE City Manager Finance Director APPROVAL OF CLAIMS October 14, 1988 It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 518 $ 309,119.97 $ 827,448.42 Checks #8266 #8301 Dated-10-03-88 thru 10 -10 -88 Checks #4321- #4432 Dated 10 -24 -88 Total per attached voucher /check register PAYROLL: $ 156,456.88 Payroll Checks $ 30,660.78 Payroll Deductions $ 187,117.66 Total Payroll $1,014,566.08 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. DFF: kaz V 0 U C H FOE` G 1 1".. / 1 1:1 1 Cc 1:1 1 1 7 C. i T 0 F M A F- L. E"A'Al Cl 1) 1"-' 1 "' C' K C --*:* I t ", T ! -1 R C..'. i -I !:*.-'. R , � %' - lE- - i-z �l --y 1.--, PAGE. 1 1) P rZ T 0. 1) 10 VOUCHER/ u. Fl E C r V E N D u rZ C HE CK --VsN rl- el p N U M t--'.E R NUMBER f) A TE NAME 1) 1 - 'S-1 C.* R I PT 10 N AMOUNT AMOUNT S z 6 it. z 3 T .1 -0 0 E A 9� t C C-1 U N T-Y -tiltE T RX r- D E PT- r I T i L.. it -, rl r 0 f1k ri E N V I K, ,FEES FOR SE RV I Cl-- 58,157.50 63,497.50 0 ft r-21, elt. A D'23'f t N t ff f f-:,,o tf f) ■ V R 2TRViCE f.'- ff -- -- f!, t tl F E E�; F C) R SERV I CE. 66, 72 8 Z 6- r 7 1 1 cl 10:3. 1 PARK.SIDE FIRE DEP11 v F E E 11 7-t R S J rZ V T C. t 15 1 3, 4 cr 4i 0 C) .10 F EE; FOR %SE FR V .1 C FEE' 4.3 0 2 s `501 48,642.50 I Do i u MAPEt 1- E A V U I- I L: I A 1-27) A S S N s 7 E 1, S I-- UTZ ;T-- 7 V 7 Z�. U 1. 3 8 7 0 943500 10/03/88 W SC ONED' IN DEPT. OF REV ENLIE' ST TA)X' PAY 2 3 9 . •3'8- 8 7 1 510900 10/03/88 MAPLEWOOD SFATE BANK F I C A P A Y A:[' L E 6 6 37' 4 4 17ED INC TAX. PAY 20, 204 .891 87 560100 10/03/88 MN STATE COMMILSSIONER 3•1 INC TAX P 9 1 742 ■06 9 1-42.06 8'73 631300 10/03/88 N0RJ'HEAST SOCCER ASSOCIATION FEES FOR SEIRVICE 2 -:2 210 .00 cl 2 7 4 t, 414.00 1 0 7 0!3 7 88. ifil Iq M S I A I E 1' R E. A S U R Fe I'% 2 , 7 5 541400 10/03/88 MINN. STA TREASURER • S*F DRIV Lli%"-' FEES 564 . 50 11-56 4 . 5 0 c8,2 6 681100 10/04/88 OFFICE PRODUCTS TRAVE-L. TRAIN 1981 00 198moo :3 L-1 Q 1.4 z 0 1 o 7 04 7 S. 81 RICEIDA7 TrAN rx T V 77 T-- IRAININ :4.3 .4 1 4:3 .4 1 7 8 5504-00 11 10/04/8 8 MI NNES01 -A CRIME'. PREVEN'VION T I -: , A V 1. L. :1- 'TRAINING 25 00 2-5.00 8279 541400 10/04/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER M 0 T 0 R V C. H L I C` F E rz;:) 10 8 . 6 9 -76 10,618. 69 8 o o 0 1 10 4 7 8 S. l y 5 C) -76 50 5 8 1 3 0 0 0 1Q 0 4 8 8 ICMA DEFERRED Of-MP 0 4 8 4 2 3 . 0 it. 901350 10/04/88 UNITED WAY UNITED WAY DED PAY 54-2.50 542.5o t) 77-1 E., 7 T1 A F N E Rl S 'H E', I U'R� A r. ',l I I-- :-- E`, 7' 1 1 Z . b 0 7 5 10 'S2-' 0 lo/05/88 ' M A P L. E ik 0 0 It' H Ol E L C. 0 rRP i J I u-3 1 0 N C: 0 4 `73 0 T i - 1 1':­ R A ' 20 ,0.00 20 iU 8 1 8 6 2. 1* 0 10 0 5 8 8 THEM MES CHARII- EcEl' J I A N A N -1) A I E N f 1 0 0 r 0 0 —7 - 1 0 o k0 7 7 ET Mil FA 7T ­771Z7,77 73 u F =-- v 5 i3 E-141 400 .1 C) C) F, r fl, I ".IN . IS T f E 1 A"" U 0 7 Ll 3 ""S .75 55 57 1 () 4. 0 0 1 0 IS _I t� S - f R I (:' C 0 Ul T C L L', V* N 7 T) 1-i'l V L I F E L "3" 0 0 11.8.00 VOUCHREG Cify 01-:' MAPLEWCIC.11) PAGE 2 10/13/88 11. : 27 13 P E R I Cl D 10 3 VOUCHER/ NUMBER 6 N U M L-",E R D A TE NAME D* E C R I f-' T I N A MOU N T C H E C K AMOUNT 7 2. U t j Q 7 10 f 0 6 SOVII: RAMEH I CA F ULL U.1 L 4 -'3 • .mot S FUEL a OIL 18.44 9 FUEL OIL. FUEL 1.3.73 I:,- Ql LJ i U V F L 1. L. E T, ME. M F U E L 01 L. .2- 14.61. 124.21 13 14 8 Is 292 1 41400 541400 1 v 7 v 6 7 13 S 10/06/88 r0l 1 Nlq ■ 6 1 A i E I-REASIORER STATE TREA MINN. SURER MU I UR VIER 1- 1 C. F E E. S STATE DRTV LIC F EES 1 1 1 064 a is 431.00 I 1 064 r Z;e: 431.00 IG 17 8 *ell 9 3 911300 10/07/88 VIETUR LORRAINE- WAGE DE.DUCTION 470 .86 4 70 8 • 8295 541400 10/07/88 MINN" STATE TREASURER STATE' ORIV LIC FEES 8 8 178 30 8296 541400 10/07/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER ST DRIV LIC FEES 664.00 664.00 z 9 7 7 Z0600 107 1 0/ 86 POSTMAS-I'ER PUS I AGE Z 500 00 !7 8:."98 630050 10/10/88 N S P U T I L I T I E -.-S U 1 1. L. I I I E,6 U T I L I T I E S 2.73 UTILIT IES 2.73 0 1 1 L I I I k.b U 'I" I L I T I E 3 IZV t 4 7 U T I L I T I Es 53.58 1 1 E I I I Es I V b UT I L. I T I [. S 6 . 95 U I' I L I T I E S 490.01 U I I L I I I ES 1. �l . V b U T I L IT I ES 6.95 o U T I L I T 11:1 6.95 7 8 1._';!9 530500 10/10/88 METRO WASTE CONff',,'OL COMM ISSN S E k) A G E -['F,,E A I'M E N T 136,363.52 136 I? � () 1 8 4 Z 9 1. U 10/10/88 ATE OF MINNESOTA A/R MISC 52 5 ' ! 000 00 .4 4321 010575 10/24/88 ACE HARDWARE MAINT MATERIAL 68.88 P 13 RA M ',Zj% U P P LS 16.40 5 2 8 ,7 4 3 2 2- 020200 10/24/88 AEC ENGINEERS OUTS 11)E ENG FE17 12-3.00 OUTSIDE ENG FEES 1 773 . 8 0 2 SO 4323 0208*75 10/24/88 ALLIED CAMERA REPAIR ; 3: MAINT/EQ 60 .00 60.00 6 i2 i3 4324 S4 02*1 2 0 0 10 4 AMERICAN FALEJENER j T f- I C t 1 S U F'P A _, V f 2 6 6 7 6 ■ 3 8 7 S5 : r c _ 5 0 4 08- 0 • 0 1 Z 4 8 8 ARI MECHANICAL '.6ERVICESi R E f T R- T 7 6- 9 7 9 ■ . 7'..-/ 7: i7 REPAIR tffAINl'/L-, 28. 30 951 .49 7� 7r, 0 F M. A P L E W D F=ACE 3 VOUCHREG j R V- . * G I "T E R `7 �_3 V Cl U H R H I o / 13 IL R - P E F-%7 T VOUCHER/ NU M E R N U til B, E R DATE N A M E I) E'-­l* R I PT I 0 ICI A AMOUNT 4 3-Z 6- cl 4-0 9 0 0 1 o 1Z 4 7 83, A R IV A L. IS A U -r 0 R Ev F, A 73. M A I lq 1 771. zo REPAIR MAINT '42 . 6 6 1 t 000.00 UTILITY CONST. 3,x:50.00 4 4-3 Z 4329 070.t 00 071200 10 124 10 2 4 BEACON PRim-Dours, BEST.BUY CO. ITI A INT. 111ATERIALF E Q U I P M UNT 0 TH F.,:'R F4 6 9 9 0 . 4 0 469.99 590 . 4 0 469.99 4330 071900 10/24/88 BLACKS PHOTOGRAPHY SUPf"LIES EQUIPMENT 60.24 60.24 2 2 43:3 1 0801700 107Z4788 B-DARD OF l4Alr--^FZ CutlytMISSIONERS IS 2 UTILITIES 52. 44 2 UTIL ITIES 31.56 2 11 T T t: I T 1 17-5 4 7 .5 4 2 U T I L I T I E S 12.12- 3 UTILIT 12.12 3 3 ul I t: 1 1 OTHER CONSTR COSTS 9 z 5 19 7 5 0 3 3 7 -j -3- Z. 0 9 05 0 0 1 12: 4 Tr i::i PRAICKE t:otll:-�*, FOR 'z 3 E. U L--. 4-72-.00 4 -7 •3 ■ 0 n. 3 3 4':_ :3 101400 10/24/88 PUILDERS ISQUARE S"MALL TOOLS 99.97 3 4 MAINI. MAIERIAL. te- 4. 0 U;14. Z f 4 4334 1 2:0700 10/24/88 CALC-TYPE CORP. EQUIPMEN'T OFFICE 259.00 4 ST-kElE. OF llRLJF7:.Rl - Y ZU . Do- 1:!, 00 4 3135 122200 1 0 12_`x! /88 CARLSON TRACTOR S U P Pl- I ES V 85 .93 85 3 4':-'. 3" 6 130550 10/d24/88 CHLMLAWN R E Fl A I R 8: M A IN'f. BLDG 622.60 62.2 60 5 5 11 n. 0 10 1 Z 41 S 8 1-1 p r r-- N A -S r- p I lq 0 7, Fr:=� FOR SERVICT- t 3-0 . 1 130 1 OT 5 4:338 140300 10 2!4 8 8 CLEAN 2SIEP RUGS F E E S F 0 R cS E F'(V I (-.: E 1.3.35 5 F- F U H Hv I C-E ;:.h- . I u 4'---'. 23. 9 140.1-50 10/;:: CLINION HUTCHINSON FEES FOR SERVICE 345.00 5 34-5.00 6 '34 ii 1 10/24/88 COLLINS EI-EC:*r-'IC REPAIR MAINT/E-0 :3 8 o REPAIR MAINT/E.Ql 4 4• , 66 12L' 2- 3 6 4341 1 4 214 0 0 10 2-'4 3 8. COPY EQUIF'MI'NT S U P Pl- I E E Q Ul f**'M E N T 83 .7 7 6 83.77 6' 7Z 4 A .. .7 r-.. Fy R171 �Up, 7, t' I rl 23 " . �r 1 2- 3. 8 12 1 'oZ '2, 7( 4 3 4 3 1 4'- 0 -. 0 1 3 -8- 'T R E • C Ir - I R' I T Y rS, ffit] NT RY : _. l... J A N I R .:: �.J t - f' f_ 1. L_ �; -14 71 22.34 71 r. 4344 1 4:.-- 0 1 4 D A L (--* (D Sl-lcFF'iLl1:­�`-j JAINITORZ 1.20 1. 0 8 tMt 7A •1 0 7a . 7f, A VOUCHREG lo/ 13!:c8 11 :27 (--: I "r Y O M 11, E Ill 0l) V --*I LJ C. I I- N" (--.- H [-.' f-­'.' FOE. 1-21 1','3. T 11-7" F",% PAGE 4 F 07-777, TrJ-U--T7)- VOUCHER/ 1: R E C. K VENOUR C R L V E N D IJ N I I Em C H E CK NUMBER N LJ M P. E R DATE NAME DE S CR I P J' I f) N AMOUNT AMOUNT 4346 230100 10/24/88 E■K.(-.,IUEHL ' S U P Pl.. I ES' FIF I C. E 177 .65 177.65 4347 240730 10/24/88 ENE B. A K CONSTRUCTION CO LAND IMPROVEME.N1 .1.6 I-AND I.Mf"ROVEMENT 29 1 6 12-f4 ■ 5 7 LANU IMHFUO-VEMENI .�jj 6QU bU YZZ V�� 4348 2'60400 1 2 4 8 8 F AIJS T- - DKOEL VEHICLE. ALLOWANCE 1•.36 4349 ZC/0100 10/24/88 FRANKS NURSERY CRAIFY OTHER CON;. -r. cosi's 15'=r . 92 159.92 C5bQ LIV 1 160 1 ZW7 U F L J E Ir, 7 10 R I Iq 6 SUFFLI.Eb V E ti I U L E 4351 300500 10/2-4/88 G l< SERVI•E'S UNIFORMS & CLOTHINE-3 1.2 .60 UNIFURM6 U L U 1 R 1 Nti' ■ 6 U N I F 0 R WS, CLOTHING 6.50 UNIFORMS Y CLOTHING 6.48 U N I F U RITZ; C. 'L Ll I H Rl U .11-18 UNIFORMS CLOTHING 12.98 UNIFORM S-3 8.- CLO -f FJ ING 50.19 -UIT-J 71- 0 R M L 0 1 H T N Gi 50.19 UNIFORMS C L 0 ­f+i I N C-i 51.70 Li N I F 0 R 'M S C:1_ 0 T H I N G 51 .70 U N I F 0 F-VIS C L. L.1 If 11 N U 51 . 70' UNIFORMS CLOTHING 44.10 U N I F 0 R 113 CLCI TH I ICI 44.10 U fq I1177iM M S 71' i71-01H ING -15.42 U N I F Cl R iyl 533 CLOTH IN( 4 5 . U N I F 0 R M S & CLOT 1-1 NG 45.42 UNIFORM & CLO[HING 27.09 UNIFORMZJ & C L 0 TH I N IS TO . 5 7 U fq I F 7! R T; C L 0 G 3 4 . :--.'9 U N I F () R 11 S US: C L. Cl "1' 1-11 N G 34.39 UN 1 F 0 R M S C L 0 J"ll 1. 1 \1G 18.00 Z 11S & CLOT H * NE U N I F OR 1 1.8.00 UNIFORMS C L C, TH 1 N G 18 .54 U N I F 0 M 'Sj C L 0 TH I N E :i I R.... ir A- A� r U N I 1::'I. - rf I R C- L 0 J* H 1 N G 18.54 &Z 9 2 0-3. 4 : 52: =110 110 10124-188 GAMM DIANE' F EES F 0 f--t SE F% V I C E. 40.0 0 40.00 4353 3 0 0 0 10 2 4 /8 8 GEOR GE S BODY SHIP REPAIR ; �: MA I N T'/ V EH I C 5 i 0 150 0 0 4. 3. 1. (7) 1 4 G 0 C 17 k7k* �i L F 7' �C - L 71 7175, -r" L R F.. P T-F,3.- mi A Nlf /V 1. 2 8 M A I N V r 7::. 7 7� 7j. I N. f / I I o 2: M A T N Fk' Fi A I v C, 4. - A N 1 V 0 ' VOUCHREG 11 : 2* 7 I'm 2 3 4 6 7 9 13 "I C. I I Y 0 F M A P L E N F-) ID V 1-3 U C: I i E V-,' I i PAGE 5 " .0 VOUCHER/ ( V E I q ul 0 IR F. C r V L' NTrr r i E M C H E C: Fr NUMBER N U M B'I:-:* R DATE NA 11"I E C-1 Et I PT 10 N1 AMOUN AMOUNT 4 3F55 3. 10 r-1 0 0 1 -0 7 27 -. 4 1 'S 'S GO PH ER E.,EA RZ I ilt-, C-0 F" F, t 1 us Sl V E F! I L r--: 17 S3 17 181 4356 310730 10/24/88 GORDON KIM FEES FOR SERVICE 90.00 90 ■ 0 4357 320:x..5 10 4 /88 GREW JANI.:. . T T R A V E L. 7 F? A I N I N(-.*i 75.00 75.00 3 Ci 4359 3. z 0- 330400 10 1 Z 4 1 8 10/24/88 OR UB ER S POW ER HARMON GLASS E". Q U 1 r- ME NT p r- r- MA NT 7 /V REPAIR MAINT 9 9 149.i REFrA M A 1 lq-r7-V-- 05 27 '2.5 4 5 4360 340110 10/24/8 HEJN'Y RENTALS, INC S LIP P L. I E'S JANITORIAL. 38.99 31-3.99 4361 341700 10 O'S HERBERT *MICHAEL J TRAVEL YRAIN 7.52 TELEPHONE 4.6-9- 12.17 4362 350875 10/24/8 HOFFMAN CORNER OIL FUEL & OIL 2--'0 . 4 0 FUEL & 01 L. 15.89 FULC & FUEL OIL 0 20.40 FUEL & OIL 17.00 FUEL 9 u I E FUEL & OIL 3 ■ 9.59 FUEL & 0 1 L. 4.62 FUEL & OIL 144t35 FUEL & OIL 21438 F UEL. U.1 L. FUEL Y OIL 1 . 50, 36.40 F UEL. 01 L. 30.20 F UE L UIL z 8 . Z FU E L. f.t. Of L FUEL a OIL 12.74 FUEL OIL 18 6 '.'�l 13 @1 6 5 4 .3 77' 0 'el T 0 .10724788 HOISINGION GHOUP A7FZ MISC k�ltl I bo 0 4364 351400 10/Z4/88 HORWATH TOM FEES •l)R 'S)ERVICE 598.00 598.00 4365 370110 10/24/88 1 HUSNIK MARY C P R 0 G f-ZA M R E G [7 E-.- E S 16.50 16.50 4 65 6- -31041.10. 1 v 7 Zq 7 8 S H.V. juHNS310N CULVERT (.;u MALN1. MAIE�HIAL b Q 4 U 0 . 4 0 4367 401800 10/24/88 J OL.L Y PROGRAM SLIP PL I L'S 7'.78 F. 7.78 fi 4 6 8 430300 10/24/88 KNOVILAN G I"' A I'd} S U P Pl- 1 J. "S --RAIN 5 w .�' '�' 6 5.38 7 7 7 4 -_3 6 V 4506.05 1 127' 4 7 Fe -3, L A K E. C. U 11 N TR 7 C'M A P T E RZ 1 k: 0, Li R A rV F: E. l?' 1196 1.7 0.00. 7 7 4370 470700 10/24/88 Lll..LIE SUBURBAN Nr---'WSF'APER.-3, LEGAL FISCAL ff, 4 it 7 71 " .0 VOUCHRE--.G CITY CIF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 6 10/13/88 11 : 27 VOUCHER/CHECK Rl--**-::l­31'.S'lER F70-R P E R 10 D ---I -C-i VOUCHER/ CHECK VERDOR K �ml 7- V E 71-TZ .1 1 1: lyi 1 1EM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAIIE DEG Cr; I PTI 0 N AMOUNT AMOUNT 11 h: L I S H 119 b 1. 55 . 60 6 4371 471310 10 LOCKE GRACE •"ROGRAM REG FEES 16. 50 16.50 4372 4901'2`00 10/24/88 LUGER LUMBER CO. MAINT MATERIAL. 1.92.70 MAINT MATERIAL 1 8 0 21 MAIN] MAIERIAE 4 E - 3. SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 385 .459 4 7 51 11 10 1 o 7 2 4 7 c mAtCatl TELURES C --- T--'ROGRAM REG FEES 4 �O PROGRAM RLGi FEES 7.00 11.50 4*374 511600 IO/Z4/ MA6YS ..,cuRP REPAIR MAIME 84 2 0 0 842.00 4375 5 *e-:.'O 5 0 0 10/24/88 MCGU IRE MICHAEL VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 350.00 -850000 43-76 522600 10/24/88 MIDWEEST ANIMAL SERVICE FEES FOR SERVICE 1 1 4--311 5 404bD 10 /Z, 4 7 2, 8 WIELIAM MIKISKA VEHICEE ALLOWANCE 67.60 97 .60 4378 540470 10/24/88 MILLER SCHROEDER FINANCIAL FEES FOR SERVICE 1 1, 114.08 4379 540880 10/24/88 MN DIV INIL ASSN IDENT TRAVEL & TRAINING 140.00 140.00 4 0 541600 1 Z 4 /S. 08 MINN-KOTA EXCAVATING AWARDED CONST CTR 2. 54 1 4 4 127 4381 570500 1 24 / 8,r MO'TOROLA� INC R EPAI R 3: MAI R 81.75 REPAIR M A I N T 180.00 261.75 4382 6.1006.0 10 2 4 8 81 MULTIMEDIA FEIES FOR SERVICE 7. 7- 4383 610200 10/24/88 MULWEE GEORGE UNIFORMS C 1- 0 T H I N G 20 .00 20 .00 4 -.3-8. 4. 6 !3- () -3 0 0 10 7 2. 4 7 i WU R FFF"-S FOR 7, ERV I � E o;.-./ 0 0 1 D 00 4385 640300 10/24/88 NEEDELS CO. SUPPLIES J AN I T OR 139.86 139.86 •3 6 640360 10/.% NELSEN MARTHA I PROGRAM REG I'.-EE S 7.00 7.00. f 4-1--i 6 4 0 5 '5 0 10 24/ 88 NELSON JEAN VEHI; ALLOWANCE 18.10 18.10 4388 670500 .10/24/88 N UTESON LAVL*P-.NF-.* TRAVEL Tl`� A I N I N Ci 6 `..O 0 6.00 4 '38 9 0600 10/24/ 88 OCTOPUS WASH CAR REPAIR MAINT/V 24,52 A R EPA I R M I N T/ V 147.12 R Ef"A I R M A If. N T / V 4 1 R E P A .1 MA I N T / E PA I R M A I N T / V 1. 39 6.13 4390 6 f5l 1 1 `35 - • 88 10 2. A N E C: A L L C. 0 N C. 11 P INC: . R S E R V I C I---- 50.00 5 0 . 0 0 V u- U C F1 R E G C 1 -1 Y F tfil A. 1" 1. E W 0 LD D PAGE 7 T r', 1 0/ 13 /'88 11 .2* 7 1 J C' I I f.'.* R 1-1 E C.4-:'. TE R 2 3 VOUCHER/ Co R E CIL'% ___ V E N J) LJ Kv Ca R E c: r' V E. M C R E Le K NU MB E R 1 3 NUMBER 6 a cl DATE 1 7 1 S NAME ER ANDREA DID C' R ] P* I ' 1 0 N T RJIT, 1"t. r P, A N i A MO U N'T AMOUN"1- 7 439 9 4392 700660 Z 4 S 10/24/38 CIS PA IDEA PRES"L'_-*HOOL/DAY CARE v! N COMM DEV M I l,-".)C • 9 5 7 157.00 15 7.00 11 4 39 *%3' I? 7 0 0 7 215 10 4 / 8 8 PAL.MA STS VEN T UNIFORMS '' C: L 0 T H 57.95 e 57 - c 5 13 4 14 15 4:3 9 5 7 cl 15 10 710610 101Z4/ 8 10/24/88 PAYNE jUD'Y PEPlek MARY C rrr=s roR sr7_RvIcE PR17JGRAM REG F:F.-.'ES 40.00 J.!F' 0 0 zo . rio 15 • 00 1 4 6 711300. 10/24/88 PETERSON, BELL CONVERSE &JENSL-:N FE F 0 R RV I E 9 3 43-71 70 21 4398 1 !32_0 711500 !0124188 10/24/88 PtTrRSON C. Ett!ANOR PHOTOS TO GO PROGRAM REe ren F'El'--'-'S FOR SERVICE -no 21.08 3 21.08 zz 23 4399 24 713000 10/24/88 PODPE-SK'AR KIM Vf':*HICLE ALL.OWANCE 9.46 9.46 25 Zt 2t 0. 2 5 27 4401 741700 742110 10124188 10/24/88 RAMSEY COUNTY RAMSEY EMERG. MEDICAL. SERVICES FEES FOR SERVICE SUPPLIES EQLIIPME.*Nl* �717 90.74 .115.00 Z8 29 4402 742900 10 'c"! 4 8 8 RAY DAVIS 23ONS SUPPlIES JANITOR 11.30 30 23UPPL.IES JANITOR 15 6 . 00 67'. 30 31 3 44 03. .33 751350 10/24/88 RICHARDS PROGRAM ',:,WPF'l..IES 1.78 1.78 440-4 3 5 36 4405 TAJ 1•3 0 0 770900 10 1 Z -4 18, 8 10/24/88 0 A D 4 tj lq 11 E p RYDER TRANSPORTATION ra E r7 p to" F! R V F. OUTSIDE 'REW"AL EQF'105.00 2! 105.00 105.00 37 313 4406 39 780100 10/24/88 Sl3vD LOCK 8AFE PROGRAM SUPPLIES 20.50 20-50 110 4 4 r) T T 8. 03. 0 0 10 124-188 S, & T 0 T C E P R 0- 1) U c- r'S 11 -1, C 1213 li P r- 1_1 E P. tr r__ f" i c E z 2 2 -9 2 22- 42 4408 800175 10/24/8.- SEH 0 Li TS I1) E:- E N G'i F L-** E S 1 43 O E E Nl G F E. E IS 83 0 1 411 45 Cl U T S I DE. E N Qf f- E'ES 3 12 46 44 T7 :3. v 74 v 0 10724788 S E'V E lq L: 0 R iq E- ACE MARDWARE S 11 A 1-'. E - 1 cl 0 7t:5 ;s I... r1-7 n. 47 Ivi 4410 '' 0: -1 0 10/24/88 SHAFER CON7RACTING CO Akly"tRDED (_ONST CON-fP*k' 65 6b .43 49 50 4411 5 x•.`0 10 %2'4 /1138 SNAP.-ON 'rOOI-'6- M A L I_ T 0t._ +1- 1:-&. 6D 160160 52 4 4 1 Z 8206.1 o T 1 Z 4 1 S!w '13 N t� 17 r- 1 N C-i C _ . , + . __ _.. ,_._ .__ L =. L_. E R r r.-a E 53 E 1 7-R t .5 0 15 .50 4 4 1 TO T 6. J 0 S u r F j- i_• P R u D U !'S7 P F C 1 I C. E 7 rS U F'P L. I F, S 0 F F I C L. 5'3 8 6 5• T* 1 RA V E L > 20.00 5 - .NUMBER fdUf�f�,EF� DATE � NAME 1�fw�C:h; IF'T Zfihl AMOUNT AMOUNT - 6' 7 8 ;. : .:.: .: . . ... _ :.; .. 1. :.::.. .. .. ,. .. .::.... is .. .. .. s:f U f` I' �» 1 iJ il.� i' E... . " _ _ _ 1 { .5 V r t , , g _gw.7 .< . . :- .. : .` . . . . ..... ., .".• 1. �UF`Fl..� E �iFFIC: , ut .8 12 r 11 12 . . SUPPLIES OFFICE 8�'a24. . - ;389,08. ,a /5 .. ,8 : , {1.1. .. t i; i< 17 1 4 r .. , } *. N ,\ J. .. Y: . •. vwl .. .. .. 1 . '• 1 r.. i' IS I. k ..... ..... s ra. 44 � t ': : c ::: r �:. fy, � w rf �_ 8 0T A D • 0 W.- . 1.�.� . . 'ASR : f ± fw r :: . ,� - , qq •�• -y r•, J, T r",.7 20 16 17 i ;, 441.6. ` . 843500 �' ':��%�4/.8S STREIC:HERS GUNS `:23 .. � aUFF'f_IE� RAhfGEF�273, 4 21 31 73.64 p:,' �,�7�.��' .. . 18 .: •, ;. 1 9I. 20 I �! • A\. _ {- rt• _1. {. h•:• �: 'i: t .. .: ., ..... ., .... ..,. ... ... .. ..... .. ". .. ,:: r R. T H :,. .. ). , y: :%. �'.; 5:. 2 :' ), • �'77 •:\ y'ti ' 1G': -0 ;. •�h . y. 6 4 s 2 i ':1 .!, •. p .fir.): .\' ♦ n. ,. ....... . r., r .. .. ". .� .... .....t:K. :.. .... ... ..... .. ... ..... .: .. .. .. .. .. .,.....:. - .. .. ...... n ...... .. . ,. r. ... .. ,.... .. t nr. \. \ :: + A.. ... .. ��,(f• �y1► }1.� [jy:, �. ... :. ;'r .. A f � L vrk�'::.: 27 2 1 ., . ,,, i . - . ., . .. ...: :. 1 1... # ,,..: , ,... , K 7 f.. 1 !i - i � y •::.J..,:+Y"•. '1' .-., ,. 23 b 1 �. a r , 3 - h,! A q T /� MAI r 1' 1 A E R I lA L, �y �} +�, i ,�y r, 30 4 4 D• s D D G. y .7 .l; . T • +.1'+:� A :�: i*" 31 24 Y . �. ,. rt ..i'� �ta -! • .. .'". '. tr•» n, v. ti'- ).. s • .�. ' :}.!� z .S : a•1. : r. �. ry. ....,r... )*.. .. ..VE .. .. .. .,, 1. •,..,,,, . .. - ., . . .. .. ....ES .. . , . ,. ...... ... ... ..... .: ,> > .., .. . f .. _. .. - ,..... .... ..... .. .. .. .. .. Y... r Y -Jt_. .r' .}.. r.• 1 x .. ) . t tK v*• 1• • N, } \ }• r 3 4 a.. �, ti a 1 F .. ...... . •i.- � F. Y { -r•`. :: :: h,t %L, f,' r {. 33' . ? ::ii'. fir':. J' �1 • ) : {. nF . r'::.;: ..t . . ry .Z .}i •.. :•S . Jf :•)t :' i'1.... 34 r'• 4. letfi r r . .. ..:.._. . :,: ... r.... n.. r ...... . a. , , ... ..\... .. ...,. t ... ., . : .. .. .. . . ,tom. ... ...... , ! ... .. ..... , .. ., .. : .. .. .. .. ...... .. a > rl.. ...... .:... ..... r. ...., .. .. . - .. r.., _ ...., : . . . ,. + n ..,. :. , . , ...., .. 4. . .. :. .. .-- .... ,'An .. .. .. ... .- .. . ... .... J. .: . :.. :.. ... ""... ., : .. OUT.i: v. .:. ., :....,. .. .. ...::.. .:. j :•v> :.rt; a i :!, <. x <i: it J:: ;. !:} . , L 2 7 " �. ..ENG J'. Y y . I 29 1 .*" - . .' t'E.1 tjUT I llE E �Ci FEF_ . �� 37 . 9 ,5' ; r.,. -, 39 30 �.: ,f I -r.' c r P' ,. ! .. -.. . - .. - -:t , - ' - -. �UT� Lf 4. 191.-i FE Evi 1if F ., Y , ' • 40 31 :. ..".... .. 7. .. , - .. .. .. :. .. .. i... v. 1. , .... ... ". ..• <. y : r. c /. Q >F ^G h- 41 �• �. F. > a S tr. >qf i i M1 3 ol .r. 7 . l_}.1. .�. . t. t „! ': a'-.9.). }. .. n . , . ..., ._. J. N.. v.:, ...,. .:.. :.. ., .. -... .. ..... .: -S -, n I. Y C� G s• ✓- t. , ,; 4�FEES c.i ,.I IENG �" >- -. i ., }. ., ... .. :.:. .....,...... ... ... :. . r.... J. ,- ... .r ..l.. .r .. .-\. .> ,lt: J �.. .:•).. :.: .:. : •. C+ +� ! ► [,, i F' ,y r E U Y U E F f" r. �'�( t r 33 .r • ..,,. <.1. . z { 1 ., .. " r: as 33 r 44 <1 0th 1.�-::. 1C�/ Ti�i l f I TY A'W Ef-�V I C .. - n -'fir: - FEES FOR SERVICE _ 45 1,"78 .' 7 -" 1- 178 .;9."7 46 � . , _ i,. 4$ 3 • �- ::.. ...177v t �. 1.., IJ y �:: �:: 49 �' `:1? : i •. �. ...... 38 r !. <}. t .: �.. :: :., ..• !: ., .T.:... ....': -.. .. .. .. .. .. - ,. -, . .. ... .... .. ... - {v . ,' ' .% Y:. ...:...:..•. ... .. c SO . Y. tN :::: J4 \. to . %vf �. 91 :.. „ y. ii x / :�c::t� ,.t /� h��t �lUT{.}IDF. iiEi TAL .j�UIF� t _ �.) . t. ?�r� :. .... I...-.>-.-- .. :,,.:,:'' 5A �. s.' 4i r 442,4:' �. 9001DD •` a`U1z4/$8- UNIFORM UNLIMITED , UI�IFUR'f�i� aY GLClTH L�1G - - 53 1 , ��aD •D�i.i :. 5 dz r Y U I F 13 f -t f': C L ID Y` M .. 6 8 �..Z 5 {,: ._ ' 4D ,. .. :. .: .y .. :: N. .. .. :. .. .: S .. .'. .. : z l: z .} {�'� .. 1. FU .. U sy 1. :.} :1. C. . as .. .... .... ... : ... _ ,. .. _ . �: d. t5 r } . t. iI. i y• r, . . / H. R 3 U fulF �J M, . G L :�.:': �r�(� . �. t .� 0.: :"W * " r.. A t.:: �: r. II9 Y 4S t."" ter. . .. ... '..: . �" . :..'. I. . .,, :. ,.."::. :. .. ... ... G.. .. Uf�fIF 3�,M� � C{ 3'TH r { 11 . P'r.. � 1 . 1' . , 1 '*r "' :% ,- gk r 47 .. ..: 44 '� 1 D -10/..24/88 1.UNIVERESAL� MEDICAL , �llFPf..IE F_��lllF ? .. art �. c1-50 � f,50 1 „�� ,. .. f .;. ;.1. wy�,k 1.)4 4 ':; +� 49 So .. " F . ;. . ,. . . .:.:. , ,. r ..» :::1..' /'# AL.L�Y F�tVf"� INC. 4:4 ,: .::..''1 t3 �. i © f z. 4 VI .. . f 1 t i �. UTHE..R_f`J.�T�.�Ta :" �:• '+.. ..: 7 ;:: I:t 4" ' ::• . ': ::.:.:..;g-:%...:. 1 . , 1 , 67 S1 :'.:t.: - .I... . .. .1 1... / ):C(.� T# h. ,y .. ... :c. 00 rS3 , F EF_� F t3R ;E. I C:F. ,, 5 . 15 V D - >„ 1 w�C 7i •.�� f� N{ 1 FEE ,., f= R 1., t� f:,1� i C' E N.r. I �� 1 . '' a a --r :. 0 •; . j �' 1.y t 76 06 V UCKRE t :. CITY OF MAP[..[' -*WOOD FAOE. �. VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER r 1,61. 1 J.I-UK 1 n J.. � f ! Y 4 2 J, 1. r ) Y r :r .V >t 7 . J.. i.f c E a '« ch L N L) P1 r.- C. K. v E ND R IT.. 5 DESCRIPTION ION -:. AM0LJNT AMOUNT 6 {SUM E'R N`Uf ER: DA 'E NAMEDESC:R 9 t. Lc t t r { S. ✓ s :. .�_ ::..: :::::.:As..:::: �A F Ru�AE FEES. Y. c,.1,if.. �iI. 12 �a:1 < { r } ! t ^%4 D) :^ J � l': X 4 88: ' WM I SE.RV�I CES' OF M I t�l�E307 A FE EW FOR SERV i GE 280.00- 280..00, 13 1a yso p ppir } r / . f. r '�!� f .r.1 NG n i.<`,l. a,.r... ... ]�..•.... 4 \. .. .. yi ' ..�- ... : •. .. .. -.: , � : :. L . j. W U.I CAT }.. 19i. 'S ) k t \5. :i 1 2 — M t 4 DUFI..ICATING COS T S 21 7 p" � x.• ., DUEL PATI NG COSTS • 23 14 i?•Y. Y�. : :T .S ••Y: T . .: .,-.:,.. ... �. .. ....J , t<04. ,r\ -:��:, ..`..•�::: .r :. .... �•. '::� . n::: ::fir-. 'a 4 {, Y. 3 ,., .. .�k .. r. ... �,,{...... x r {� { r . < � � XPi i .✓J : • �:' { A ,1 A... A � 28 .. .. .. .. .. ... .... .. .. .. ... .... ... ... ... . ..,.. .. .... ...... .. .. ^ ... ... .. .r. v qq '.. ,,fir 27 ... ,. .✓.. n .... ........ .. .......... .. ,.. .. ... .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. 3' - ... ... .. r. ., .... .. .... .... ..0 a ., {? ' 1 :\. - .\ '!tS 1 fi•♦ J >+ tC Y. 28 29 .2 •F 4 r � , Y'• 'l t' vt- r s iY >q' • .� n t � � it �,i � L/ :r= T OTAL CHECK 4J � K. 1'' , r r L M. 4 `1 _ 'r i.. t >. S 32 r' .12 •.✓ 1 �p rxC,,, a • C• , .. .. ,- ✓ .. ., .x . , .. . �.. .. ... r✓ . .>'. ... ... .. .. .... ,: <::�'::••.::::.::.:..:•, ,-:.:.:.::...:r:: ,.'F•.: •7Y3 � Z ..y. .! a _. l: y>•n ,.: ✓v, , r : r• . -\. ,..r • .. h Y:,.- .. •.: �r-: •.,•:.. •.;• r:: �;'•;. , ire • :::'r:�.. :?:fi+'.�:.` :>< ,. ♦ } a r. - .. .. .. :.:... 1. ......, . �.::.. 1.. . 3 .. ... .. .. .. s .:a. > . ^( �'r' .. Si. a '� r J • n 'iii • .,`f•`h...,.. .•, .. .. ... it } .. .... .,. , ..... .. .- .. 3. ... ... .<. �:h.. 7 r 37. t. to }j�� V�:v_ ). ''S" 1. {•: .. r 1 � 1... -,S � �{ 39 40 iV , t' > �.. P ? T y 'N \ r 7• •H'• 41 p . a.. J. t 5 „V ,. ......., ..�,...... .r., .. , `r`S! .r. t t•r•: -:'' .. .... ....: .:: :. '4 . .. .: .... .... ... ,... y yr 34 46 47 46 }6 N u' , {t. •,, . . r . r x i 37 :v ;t. 49 .. �. .. +... ... ..... r. ... ., .. .... .. .. .. :.. x. r .> •fr r 51 •.t 39 , S! c r AO g 41 2% !� a i ••U r .Y } k L L, r ) ?Tr .l 44 •1J' S rt{>{n \ ,,{0 .15 a• J 46 r 47 '66 1 48 r. . r n ! ) i• fit >i so j 5 1 - ! 52 !� 53 1 54 _ . �:. ii t •. i �t`T 55 74 'w '38 j•. :: �': r. 17t > .:.',: ; : t , zap ., r L CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 10/07/88 CHECK #5484.- CHECK #5637 McGUIRE, MICHAEL A. BLACKSTONE, GAIL ZAWACKI , KATHRYN BEHM, LOIS N. JAHN, DAVID`J. SWANSON, LYLE CODE, LARRY J. OSTER, ANDREA J. MIKISKA, WILLIAM FAUST, DANIEL F. TAYLOR, LINDA MATHEYS, ALANA K. VIGNALO, DELORES A. ANDERSON, CAROLE J. LA MOTTE, MARLENE AURELIUS, LUCILLE E. SELVOG, BETTY D. SCHADT, J EANNE L. KELSEY, CONNIE L. HOSCHKA, GERMAINE VIETOR, LORRAINE S. HENSLEY, PATRICIA A.. CARLE, JEANETTE E. RONGSTAD, CAROLEE COLLINS, KENNETH V. RICHI E, CAROLE L. SVENDSEN, JOANNE M. NELSON, ROBERT D. FULLER, ELAINE OMATH, JOY E. MARTINSON, CAROL F. ZAPPA,. JOSEPH A. STILL, VERNON T. SKALMAN, DONALD W. NELSON, CAROL M. MORELLI, RAYMOND J. STEFFEN, SCOTT L. ARNOLD, DAVID L. BANICK, JOHN J. BOHLI JOHN C. CAHANES, ANTHONY G. CLAUSON, DALE K. MOESCHTER, RICHARD M. ATCHISON, JOHN H.' PELTIER, WILLIAM F. SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS J. WELCHLIN, CABOT V. LANG, RICHARD J. PALMA, STEVEN T. HERBERT,. MICHAEL -J. DREGER, RICHARD C. MEEHAN, JR,, JAMES E. STAFN E , GRE -GORY L. BECKER, RONALD D. HALWEG, KEVIN R. 2,538.46 1,374.10 915.70 942.10 805.30- 950.70 242.40 817.66 157.60 1,934.90 744.59 968.07 949.66 1,095.45 280.50 1,788.50 108.50 960.57 568.37 630.92 838.29 482.44 838.96 222.00 1,996.50 819.26 1,108.67 1,735.70 161.63 834.46 804.06 1,561.48 1,378.28 1,403.88 1,511.08 1,378.28 1,562.59- 1,561.48 1,568.86 1,505.33 1,735.70 1,403..88 1,416..83 1,403.88 .1,561.48 1,544.24 1,577.59 1,293.93 1,287.38 1,512.42 1,561.48 1,485.64 1,403.88 1,561.62 2,196.08 CITY OF PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR CHECK #5484 STOCKTON, DERRELL T. PAULOS, JR., PAUL G. BOWMAN ,. R I C K A. NARIS, FLINT D. HEINZ, STEPHEN J. GRAF, DAVID M. THOMALLA, DAVID J. YOUNGREN, JAMES G. RAZSKAZOFF, DALE E. VORWERK, ROBERT E. BERGERON, JOSEPH A. MELANDER, JON A. EMBERTSON, JAMES M. WILLIAMS, DUANE J. RABINE, JANET L. STAHNKE, JULIE A. BOYER, SCOTT K. RYAN, MICHAEL P. FEHR, JOSEPH NELSON, KAREN A. FLAUGHER, JAYME L. HAIDER, KENNETH G. CHLEBECK, JUDY M. WEGWERTH, JUDITH A. MEYER, GERALD W. KANE, MICHAEL R. LUTZ, DAV I D P, KLAUSING, HENRY F. SCHMOOCK, JOHN HELEY, RONALD J. OSWALD,. ERICK D. TEVLIN, JR., HARRY J. FREBERG, RONALD L. CASS, WILLIAM C. LINDBLOM, RANDY ELIAS, JAMES G. PECK, DENNIS L: PRIEBE, WILLIAM IRISH, BRUCE A. GESSELE, JAMES T. GEISSLER, WALTER M. METZ, TERRY LOFGREN, JOHN R. ODEGARD, ROBERT D. BRENNER, LOIS J. KRUMMEL, BARBARA A. STAPLES, PAULINE JONES, LUTHER BOWES, WILLIAM TRAVERS, DANIEL L. VASQUEZ, MICHAEL ANDERSON, ROBERT S. LINDORFF, DENNIS P. GARRY, WILLIAM HELEY, ROLAND B. MAPLEWOOD PAY PERIOD ENDING 10/07/88 - CHECK #5637 1,429.10 .838.73 1,375.98 1,390.28 1,436.88 1,467.08 1,727.81 1,698.57 1,454.28 1,467.08 1,492.82 1,575.38 1,482.90 1,361.11 941.43 932.86 843.88 1,664.39 728.86 1,038.71 968.86 1,934.10 1,013.69 473.68 1,147.26 1,224.68 1,084.87 1,147.26 797.60 1,107.28 973.61- 11126.46 73.611,126.46 1,134.74 1,596.68 895.57 1,280.06 1,280.06 1,210.46 1,505.64 1,233.67 1,361.35 848.86 901.92 1,797.30 968.86 432.53 1,499.88 72.00 204.00 58.50 373.45 1,054.46 1,091.34 783.26 1,132.94 CITY OF MAPLEW000 PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 10/07/88 CHECK #5484 - CHECK #5637 THORN, PAUL 388.00 MARUSKA, MARK A. 11382.39 BURKE, MYLES R. 12147.26 GERMAIN, DAVID A. 11126.46 LAMBERT, J. 92.50 BRAUNIG, P. 27050 HANNEGAN, A. 140.00 COLLINS, ANDREA 10.40 SCHMIESING, J. 50.00 MUNTER, B. 73.75 PODPESKAR, K. 112.50 VAN WYK, K. 140.00 HERBER, TODD 80.00 ANDERSON, C. 105.00 BESETH, JR., R. 22.50 NELSON, J. 105.00 FISCHER, P. 100.00 ADAMS, N. 27.50 WARD, ROY G. 406.40 TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS J. 1,196.68 GREW, JANET M. 11024.86 NELSON, JEAN 321.65 HORSNELL, JUDITH A. 502.83 HUTCHINSON, ANN E. 472.77 BARTA, MARIE L. 804.06 DOHERTY, KATHLEEN M. 906.46 OLSON, GEOFFREY W. 11786.10 MISKELL, NANCY 215.36 LIVINGSTON, JOYCE L. 421.07 GENEROUS, ROBERT 333.20 EKSTRAND, THOMAS Ge 11280.08 JOHNSON, RANDALL L. 11283.86 OSTROM, MARJORIE 11494.28 CARVER, NICHOLAS N. 11138.46 WENGER, ROBERT J. 11233.66 LACASSE, CASEY 220.00 NADEAU, EDWARD A. 11208.70 NAGEL, BRYAN 796.06 MULWEE, GEORGE W. 11104.86 NUTESON, LAVERNE S., 11560.14 BREHEIM, ROGER W. 11135.42 EDSON, DAVID B. 11198.32 MULVANEY, DENNIS M. 11212.86 SPREIGL, GEORGE C. 11009.66 ------------ $156,456.88 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 10/07/88 CHECK #5484 -.CHECK #5637 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION Z1 $ 61560.43 CITY & COUNTY EMP CR UNION Cl 22,687.00 AFSCME 2725 U1 442.35 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS 19-3988 160.00 METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOC U3 18.00 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM Z2 247.00 L.E.L.S. P1 546.00 GRAND TOTAL ------------ $ 30,660.78 $187,117.66 Action by Council .- MEMORANDUM Modified--, Re ected,,__1____._._ Date TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand , Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Renewal and Revisions LOCATION: 1810 County Road B APPLICANT/OWNER: Roger Fulk PROJECT: Fulk Manufacturing, Inc. DATE: September 7, 1988 SUMMARY Introduction The applicant is requesting renewal of a conditional use permit for an M-1, Light Manufacturing use within 350 feet of a residential one. Bac k2roup d On January 25, 1988, Council renewed this CUP for six months, subject to: Landscaping in accordance with the approved plan. 2. Trash enclosures as required by code, or the construction of an eight --f oot-tal I 1 100%. opaque decorative wood screening fence between the original shop building and the shed to the south.. All trash containers shall be kept between these two buildings. The construction of the fence is an interim remedy for screening. Total screening of all trash receptacles may be required in the future, depending on the development of the adjacent lot to the southwest. Discussion (landscaping and trash dumpster screening) The applicant has shown progress with the sodding of the site which indicates that the required improvements are slowly being completed. The grounds north and west of the building are now sodded. There is no need for the additional plantings shown on the landscaping plan on page 7, due to the existing growth of mature oak trees, which are better than the young trees typically provided. The landscaping plan should, therefore, be deleted from - the CUP conditions. The wooden screening fence between the shed and the original shop building has not yet been constructed. All trash containers are being kept between the buildings, however. This is acceptable during the summer, due to the tree and brush growth. Screening during the winter is still needed. The applicant . indicated that he would rather install chain link + ence + or better du'rab i I i ty and I ower ma i ntenance Staf f, has no problem with this i+ slats are added to hide the trash containers* Recommendation R . enewal of the conditional use permit for' three months for a machine shop within 350 feet of a residential district at 1810 East County Road B, subject to trash enclosure being provided as required by codeq or an eight--foot--tail , 100% opaque screening fence shall be installed between the original shop building and the she . d to the south along the east .lot line. All trash containers shall be kept between these two buildings. Total screening of all trash receptacles may be required in the future , depending on the development of the adjacent lot to the southwest* REFERENCE Back ground I .. Counc i I orig inal I y granted a CUP for the app icant I s + irst building on September 10, 1979. A CUP was issued for the newer concrete block shop building on February 13, 1984. Four renewals were granted. The present conditions of approval are: a. The hours of operation shall generally be between 5:00 A.M. and 10:00 P.M. b. All equipment and machinery shall be stored indoors. ca All fire safety regulations shall be met. d. All junk vehicles and any other miscellaneous debris shall be removed from the premites, e. Adherence to the site plan, dated January 6, 19845 unless a change is approved by the City's Community Design Review Board. 2. On January 24, 1984, the Community Design Review Board conditionally approved the site plan for this project." Condition two required that if the trash dumpster is kept outside, it shall be stored in masonry enclosures with a 100% opaque wooden gate according to orginance, and shall be a color and material compatible with the building. Location and design shall be subject to staff approval. Ordinance Requirements Subsection 36-187 (b) : No building or exterior use, except parking, shall be erected, altered or conducted within 350 feet of a residential district without a conditional use permit. Subsections 36-442 (e, f and g) state the following: (e) Al I conditional use permits shal I be reviewed by the council withi.n*one year of the date of initial approval,, unless such review is waived by council decision or ordinance. At the one year review, the council may specify an indefinite term or specific term, not to exceed five (5) yearsq for subsequent reviews. The council may impose new or additional conditions upon the permit at the time of the initial or subsequent reviewsm A conditional use permit shall remain in effect as long as the conditions agreed upon are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Any conditional use that meets the agreed upon conditions and is l'ater disallowed because of the city enacting or amending official controls shall be considered a legal nonconforming usen (+) The council may, upon review, terminate the permit if the approved conditions may have been . viol ated or the use is no longer in effect. Where the construction of a special bulding or structure of a monetary value in excess of twen ty-+ive thousand ($259000.00) has been permitted the council shall provide for a period of amortization of not less than five (5) years. Where public health, safety and welfare concerns are threatened, the five-year amortization period is not required and the council may determine the amortization periodg. if any, to be allowed. (g) In the event the council in its review process decides to consider imposing additional conditions or termination of a conditional use permit, the city council shall hold at least one public hearing on that permit after a notice of the hearing has been published in the official newspaper at least ten (10) days be -fore said hearingo The council shall also cause a notice to be mailed to each of the owners of property within three hundred fifty (350) feet of the boundary lines of the property; upon which such use has been established v which notices are to be ma i I ed to the 1 ast - k nown address of such owners at I east ten (10) days before the date of the hearingo ni.m/Ful k Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Original Site/Landscape Plan original AVE. J W KONLMAN AVE. A e;. Z 23 J MM Y :� AO C�. a =' ., JVI'E U EOGEHILL It0. . M J 65 J ~ OEMONT AVE. R OK ii in CK AV IIIA AVE. 0 �• ' ' s 11 T AY.• CJ VAI RVAI AV VE ' O ANCVIEw IFAVJ, CURT • 3E IK 1 OR s3T�E ►v 7SH-- ERAEN. AVE -� AMEN E. ' E AVE. OPE AVE. LARK. AVE. LARK AVE. H •.:: LAURIE j I Ao. _ a: 1LAURIE1 Flo . 4C 25 UBS: IAVIE. I65 .. W 641-74 t o: AVE. } EU KE l ;i X11. ELOR100 J AVE. B �• �Ns� -000 (I A *UBLIC RKS 1BELMON11T 64 W a: AVEw �� N ISKILLMAI N o AVE. _ NA Ft 13 Ros IWOOD AVE. [RY UAN t ••j a 29 Lo I q L N h Z$ �� C .� w 4i - — J R W W 5 ll Woof field W ---- i 91?(I4,2STQN�'' AVE o � „ 2 Lake c = =_ 3 : W PRICE =AVE ►- act If .+t�-1 LOCATION MAP ' Attachment 1 N- Y. Kinney 1850 Shoe Nb 41 %J . . . . . . . . . . FULK MANUFACTURING, I NC do C Z1314 D.). LJ 0 �■w�wwrsriw�w .z OF WOO pq 00.000, ..or PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 5 Attachment 2 -�rrr•••• - --- --- Io ny- County Road 8 '0 • • • • •• ` • • • r • • •• • • •• • r4� •a • •� •�• • I••N • _ • r • w.. Is ♦`�� •.` MMS- •�. '�•. . 11 �• •. 1• �• •• �. • �• • r , •• • • • •• I • • • • • • ,� • d 1IND '00. '� �1 N - '• ` • Op 00 to, goo 0 QM ♦ 4or 1t, 1 • •�the 116• _ � �� •�_. -••y'' •� ILI exi sti ng treeft 0 .011 ' �';�• Black Hill s _ _•- :�' .:�_::;:,;;#1.:t'.;;►,;,� ;� Existing N�' Spruce . �''�- ��,�:.Y;;;7•.:'�.•� .��� • ;,.• I . ' /• U, ..a ) In (F -0 - < of !tLLJ • • • • '•• • ••i • f I •� 1 W*1 CIO � I' • ' �: Mu ho Pines ''�•••r�:r•%'•':�t:'•,'•r/. • g •• •_ If 1•I;• ,go % New Shop 11 N' ,• Of �-•1 • '• ��t • •• •Globe Arborvitaes oil 0 /� lit. care to 1.1:,1. I ' tom♦ got LL— J. I. V to It AP 00 met M&4*1101! 1 !i,�•rl+ • goo, 010-1 • O • i•--- ii{ l..� �1 V toll , ,•' 1 .. 1 )x•11• �r �. ���` t •11' I • I V' 11 1 l-LAIcy16 - • •fib A IC- MA T70 • '�/►1•i��=i•• i!f i•�►' ,fit •�•I� �/ •�' , M fft. de dot CL p � . original Shop , w ' • ' Building -� �1 a 1 . • � `• i1 Fxisttnnl' �trr._•tetMc.t-� Recommended Garage ' tall • •• too 8—foot— ,, (' ` d..11c:v' �.' pit j • • , . • • screening fence • -_ c ►, ! i • y t • .. . • , xletin ill Is .1��11 Shed - •- *toil1 `. Recommended storage area for trash SITS Pled AND. LANDSCAPING Attachment 3 7 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: APPL I CANT /PROPERTY OWNER: LOCATION: PROJECT: DATE: Introduction a Action by Council, MEMORANDUM Endorsed.."1­1. City Manager :fie ected,1,1, ---- Associate Planner --Johnson Time Extension Carl iia idmen t McKnight Roadl So of Dahl Ave. ria idmen t Terrace- Preliminary Plat October 17, 1988 The applicant is requesting a one-year time extension. for the Maidment Terrace preliminary plat (See page 4 .) Bach mound This plat received preliminary plat approval on October 26, 19870 Discussion Installation of the utilities is nearly complete. The applicant expects to apply for final plat approval in the near future. No code changes or changes in the area have occurred that warrant amendment of the original conditions of approvalm Recommendation Approve a one-year time extension for the Maidment Terrace preliminary plate mb/ma idment Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Preliminary Plat i S O IF i f _ 14 } _ F 4 • LOWER F L 8 G C O ( PUO) IF F 1 NOIN LANE 15 IP .� 46' r (PUD) , R' • 16 PUO F AV � F v _ F • } R _ cr Rl • MIGHwoo f AVE � MAMNE e 8Y RitR , R • f R 19 "� i # mow• .� .�� { •'r' ARS_ ��� .. � �'• _F ` • Ir1411 _ `I . ISO' eo �a ' j2 fLG • 2j... ta.e S o nr.) le)w HTE ERS,)ap � kleft.!o ;p = i%p. �// ' IT ` �� '��}� r. , \� •� �•�.;1` (s) i , 143t 1p. �12� 15 SS e` ;_z13q) c -. •+ 's ` ♦ ao e��12 f 92.10 1 �`r'r% tes'1�3AVE• / \\\ ' T110FA \� J '13760 Zil I\ 23 ix V --ftk % % . 1. 11 29 ?► \j - 775ji t01 F. Ile Co 29 �►�'' - j 780:; r '!; " _ :�, Il /;•:;•�'%I �� 2262 2270 2278 2296 2298 , 7999 - }. • 4= • -7, i� 810 _ p _ ; _ — • 1. .., / , !--"—\\ •�, .,f=T..` udd Kol by 2nd l ►� ��S:;%.•� A Add i t ion���- � �,� "` j► t Preliminary Plat--- 40 2321 - •'�� ;r/, 4•/i _�, �\•.� 2320 2314 ' ,1.�. �` �._,� �� `. !' 9 . •I Iii \- �/� A. 0 �x- OUTL AN OUTLOT 2315 , � � •�'� ��\ � 0:11 v ' N �1 • \\ \�,\� `��rr�i i go f 132 233. • r 7 C� K - 12 7 J • � '. • ;', ,$w/.3 /,wr or ? b�A • A'�ijf .A W �� �� N 15 14 CZE) .� , �'�._.• - ,/!,/� / , //-13 C3z) (�� (30) s�4•ol 1 4.l�;, (t i Y • / /�! Ijj� • 107 100 tw/ l ! % �•�. _i /' I / TI MBER T `, ,r .S4 too S j j I ,4RELIMINARY / T ' T i JEFFERSON / ,/Fo RSH / A 1 1 - f 1 • (14)cup 4 r PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 13,Attachment 2 •..N J/.• -•l. Iib.!• . •..•�1 1 • y 40 0 '004 "00- . 154 440 .1 . � ' v _ — — '•r i � � �-5 � ti.• EXIST. �ItN 12r RE 56.20 Ole • SIL R G ` 9� tpH/. %950.05 of fj 16 DRAINAGE � ; •�JTIuTY EASEMENT --.� Row �, ; oil PROPOSED SPLIT LINE (TYPICAL). 1 \-IBWWOFF' ` pq`� •- ARK '^IVAItVE .. MIK BASEMENT \ r 1 440'� ' gLEVATION (TYPICAL}-� \ i ! • a • • / ,' ! SEE . NOTE 1 .r i \�� I .•1 Ole _ lop r 1 ; % e / I Iv �,S0 DRAINAGE •&UTILITY , ��t .+w p, +r-> a% :.{ �`rti ► - '' • EASEMENT I T MAW e •• � ! - � lit .. . . . 1007 • 4r - - PRELIMINARY PLAT (Approved 10-26-87) 4 Attachment 3' n AGENDA NO. A G E N D A R E P O R T Action by Cour' cil:, Endo Modified,—"---- TO: odified, TO: City Manager e Qcted, FROM: Finance Director RE: Disposal of Old Financial Records DATE: September 29, 1988 Authorization is requested to make application to the State for disposal of old financial records. r% A /Y t/ A AAt t\ tt1 For the past several years, the City has been microfilming its financial records. The main reason for microfilming has been to conserve valuable space in the City Hall -- microfilming results in a 96% reduction in the number of file cabinets and space required for records storage. Once records are microfilmed, the original copies are packed and sent to the Public Works Building for storage. (The State Auditor requires that the original copies be kept for s i x years.) The microfilm copies are kept in the City Hall and copies are also in safe deposit boxes at a local bank. Annually the City disposes of records that are over six years old. However, before the records can be destroyed, the City is required by law to submit the attached resolution and application for approval to the State. It should be noted that the application requests approval to destroy only the original copies. The microfilm copies will be kept as a permanent record. RECOMMENDATION The attached resolution is recommended for adoption. DFF:1nb RESOLUTION WHEREAS, M.S.A. 138.17 governs the destruction of city records; and WHEREAS, a list of records has been presented to the Council with a request in writing that destruction be approved by the Council; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA; 1. That the Finance Director is hereby directed to apply to the Minnesota State Historical Society for an order authorizing destruction of the records as described in the attached list. 2. That upon approval by the State of the attached application, the Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to destroy the records listed. PR -1 (Rev. 73) MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY 1500 Mississippi S t . , St. Paul, MN 55101 APPLICATION FOR ACITHORITY TO DISPOSE OF RECORDS Application No. Date Received_ JNSTRUCTI : Mam Make -original and three copies. Complete items 2.3.4. 5. 6 and 9a, b C. Use reverse side of form to continue records description. If more space .is needed, use whits bond paper similarily spaced. Send original and two copies to the above address. Retain one copy while your application is being processed. You will receive an approved copy of your application, which will be your authority to dispose of records. The approved copy should be retained permanently. -- - Policy legislature that the -NATE: Lava of 1871, Chapter 529, -Section 2 reads��as follows: "it a the po cy of the I disposal and preservation of public records be controlled 'exclusively by Minnesota Statutes. Chapter 138 and by this act, thus, no prior, special or general statute shall be construed to authorize or prevent the disposal of 'public records at a time or in a manner diff ereint than prescribed by such chapter or by this act and no general or special statute enacted subsequent to this act shall -be construed to authorize or prevent the disposal of public records at a time or in a manner different than prescribed in chapter 138 or in this act unless it expressly exempts such records from the provisions of such chapter and this act by specific reference to this section." 1. TO: Minnesota Historical Society 2. FROM: CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Finance Department Agency or OHICIS Subdivision or Section 3. QlantitY • of Records; cubic feet 13.68 or linear feet 4. Location o i fRecords: Maplewood Public Works Building . _ .5. Laws other than M.S. 138.17 that relate to the destruction or safekeeping of the records:' None to our knowledge 6. 1 certify that the records listed on this application are accurately described, and that they have no further administrative., legal, or fiscal value for this agency. 7. AUTHORIZATION Under the authority of Minnesota Statutes 138. 17, it is hereby ordered .that the records listed on this ippl ica tion be destroyed, except as shown below (item 8). Director, Minnesota Historical Society 9/21/88 Legislative or State Auditor NUthorized Signature Date Daniel:F. Faust -.Finance-Director- _ _ ee an T t e ease print or t e Attorney General in S. Exceptions to Destruction. (Poor use by Director, Legislative Auditor, State Auditor, and Attorney General only.) Date . Date Date 9. Description of Records • Describe each record series or type of record separately. Number each series, beginning with "l ". a . Item No b. Name of record, form numbers, content, usage, arrangement, original, duplicate, or microfilmed c. Inclusive Dates 1. 1 FINANCIAL RECORDS ' Schedule of Accounts Monthly Batch Proof Monthly Activity Listing Monthly Sub -Ledger Monthly Budget & Revenue End of Year Sub -Ledger Monthly General Ledger Books Accounts Payable Listings Monthly Bank Statements. Original 1981 Original 1981 Original 1981 Original 1981 Original 1981 Original 1981 Original 1981 Original 1981 Original 1981 r a. Serie b. Name of record, form numbers, content, usage, arrangement, No. original; duplicate, or microfilmed. 1. (CON'T.) FINANCIAL RECORDS End of Year Vendor Cards Original.: Expenditure Vouchers & Documents , -' #2996 thru #12065 Original ' Direct Expenditure..Vouchers & Documents #5129 thru #6719 Original Receipt Books _ #26619 thru #32220 & #2067 thru #2950 Original Time Sheets Original Journal Entries Original Vehicle Equipment Maintenance Records Original t Ambulance Billings Reports original Cancelled Checks & Direct Checks #5019 thru 12065 Original Corkman's Comp. Claims Original Accident Repoarts , Original Pay Rate Documentation Book Original Health Insurance Book Original 2. PAYROLL RECORDS ' Cancelled Payroll Checks #26357 thru #2486 Original Bi --weekly Payroll Registers Original Quarter -to -Date. Payroll Registers Original Payroll Deductions Listings Original Community Profile Original Employee Benefit Report Original Maintenance Reports Original c. Inclusive Dates 1981 1981 1981 1981 1981 1981 1981 1981 1981 1981 1981 1981 1981 1981 1981 1981 1981 1981 1981 1981 AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Act -ion by Council TO: City Manager FROM: Public Works Coordinator SU®� BJECT: Fina l Payment --1988 Over lay Pro jest Mlodif J d. DATE: September 30, 1988 lZee c -� e-- J D�te The contractor has successfully completed Project 88-16 in accordance with the specifications. Because of the favorable pricer Linden Lane and Gervais Avenue, east of White Bear Avenue were added to the contracts bringing the total price to $105,472.12, The original estimate for the project was $125,5008 Final payment is recommended. ic CITY OF MARL-EW[K]1) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B MAP'.- !,..'.-.'WOOD,, MINNESOTA 55109 ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMENT Estimate No. 1, Period Ending r Septembe22, 1988 Sheet 1 of 1 Project No. 88-16 Project: 1988 Bituminous Overlay Or1g1nal Contract Amount $ 94,764.00 Total Contract Work Completed to Date $ 94,764.00 Total Approved Credits $ 0.00 Total Approved Extra Work Completed $10,710.12 Approved Extra Order� Amount Completed $ 10,710.12 Total Amount Earned This Estimate $105,474.12 Less Approved Credits 4.- e s s ess 0 Percent Retained $ 0.00 Less Previous Payments Total Deductions $ 0.00 Amount Due This Estimate $105,474.12 400V Contractor Date Engineer ate City Engineer e U TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT/OWNER: PROJECT: : DATE: Introduction MEMORANDUM City Manager Associate Planner --Johnson Prel iminary and Final Plat 2195-2201 Wood 1 ynn Avenue Mack Nettleton Wood iY n n Heights T own h omen No. 3 September 29, 1988 SUMMARY Ac�c_° 01n by Count - -i ,tat ems. J S------ d - Date d iminary an The appl scant has requests P rel d final plat approval 9 } . The four- unit ur-- f our townhouse 1 ots and an out l of (page to create Plat is �� n i t townhouse structure has been constructed. This p o be individually owned. The outl of needed to allow each unit t is for the common driveway to access the units. The out 1 of will be owned by the homeowner's associations ri i sc s sson.. he Woodl nn Heights A condition of approving t Townhouse Now Y dl nn Avenue with p.1 at was "s i dewal k s w i l l be required al ong Woo Y any +Uture platting." alk should the appl scant be The issue is how much sidewalk n i b 1 e for at this time . Mr. Nettleton bel Teves that the respo s d 1 ynn Avenue shoal south side of Woo property owners on the participate i n t he cost. However, to expedite this plat , he is willing to construct and pay for the entire sidewalkfor this n to commit to the construction of any property. He is unw i i 1 ig 1 Council discusses a city-wide policy addit-ional sidewalk anti for financing sidewalk construction. completion etion of the sidewalk, east to A decision regarding the P � � the property •nig ht. Road does not have to be made until P Mc k:� o t is subdivided . Likewise for the property abutting to the east t time Council w i l l have considered a proposed osed the west. By tha � . city-wide sidewalk -plan which addresses the issue of f inancin9 . Recommendation s Townhomes No . 3 preliminary and Approve the Wood 1 ynn Height f inal pl at . I CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff surveyed 26 persons and organizations that own property ite. One response was received. This within 350 feet of this s person" s 1 etter is attached (page 8) . Staff reply: Question One. A city grading permit is required to alter the easement areas of platting i ng townhouse lots i s to G!�.�est i an Two: The purpose P However, the allow each unit to be ind i v i dually owned . homeowner's a550C 1 at i on is responsible for, the maintenance the townhouse structures , common driveways of the outside of Declaration of Covenants and utilities . Section 10 of the also makes the association responsibl-e for the maintenance of the ' pr i vat a rear yard areas. n requires i res sodded front and side The approved landscaping Pl a q haw i t wants yards. The homeowner's association can decide to deal with the vegetation within the NSP easements 2 E REFERENCE Site Descriptions Area: ..95 acres Existing land use : four -unit townhouse structure Existing easements: NSP and Amoco pipeline easements are located on the north 155 f eet of the site . Surround i n.5L Land _Uses North U • ndevel oP ed property, planned for RM, residential . medium density uses East: An undeveloped lot which is the same site as this lot. The applicant also plans to construct o f our -un i t townhouse on that lots South. • Wood 1Y nn Avenues Across the street are single dwel 1 Ings .. West Undeveloped property owned by the applicant and planned , p for RM, residential medium density use. The applicant is proposing additional four -unit structures on this property. east Actions 4-2-22-95:Council conditionally approved a preliminary and final C c�un c plat for the first of the three, four -unit townhouse structures that have been constructed by the applicant (corner of McKnight Y Road and Woodl nn Avenue). This property and the property adjoining to the east and west were required to be platted as an out i of to restrict development until the area was properly graded. 12-8-86: Council approved a preliminary p1at for Wood 1 yn n Heights Townho mes No. 21 subject to conditions that included : in City engineer approval of a grading and drainage plan for property. the entire The plan shall also Provide d i it i ng as needed along t he north property line to prevent over -land flowage from a break in the p ipel ine . 2 . Al 1 of Lots 2 - 7 and as much of Lot 1 as is necessary f or effective drainage of Lots 2 - 7 shall be graded according to the n or a developer's t shall be entered s agreemen approved grading plan into with the required surety, to guarantee completion of this grading . 3 0 • c 3' A developer's agreement shall be entered into, with the required surety , that includes,, but is not 1 im i ted to. restoration of Wood IYn n Avenue following connections to public utilities. 4. The city shall. approve the homeowners' s association bylaws and rules to assure that there will be one responsible party for the maintenance of the on-site private ut i 1. it ies and driveways. . A written statement shall be submitted to the City from NSA' and Amoco authorizing the grading proposed in the approved grading plans 6. Sidewalks will be required along Wood 1 ynn Avenue with any future , p l at t i n g. 4--13-8?• Council approved roved the Woad 1 ynn Height No. ^ final p1at. . Co 31s8• The Community t Design Review Board approved site and . Y building pa 1 n s for the four -Unit structure located on this sites Final occupancy has not been approved. Among the requirements for' CEIRB approval are drainage and utility plans shall be subject to the 1 'Lots 1 Grading, ng 'L 2 and 3. This shat 1 city engineer's approval , including ong , include any temporary grading necessary for drainage from adjacent 1 ots . Al07% A-a 1 public is boul evard that is disturbed dine to this construction shall be restored and resodded . 3 . The applicant shall provide a monetary guarantee, in a form acceptable to s taf f, in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of any Site improvements that are not completed by occupancy. Public Works s A 1. Additional grading needs to be completed to satisfy the CDRB conditions. A cash escrow is required if occupancy is requested before this work is completed. . Wood 1 ynn Avenue is designated and has been built to function as a collector street between McKnight Road and Ariel Street, Wood 1Y nn Avenue is designated as art anterial roadways 3a Staff is preparing ar i n revised street designation and s i dewal k: plans. Wood IY n n Avenue is proposed to remain designated as a collector streets The revised sidewalk plan proposes. a sidewalk along at least one side of all collector streets. In this case,9 the north side is preferred ref erred location to between Ariel Street and McKnight Road because the planned population is higher than along the south side of the streets A sidewalk along the south side is also so to be constructed between Ariel Street and the Cottages of Maplewood 4 4 . Section �9- 5 (4) (Streets, r eets, sidewalks . and public grounds) . 6�� requires sidewalks to be constructed near schools, heavily traveled areas and other areas, when approved by the' City Councils mb/macknett .mem Attachments: 1 Location Map . Property Line/Zoning Man 3. Citizen Comments 4. Proposed Preliminary and Final Plat (8 1/2 x 11) 5 .• - V- Ngmkw&r L Ec LOCATION MAP 6 ATTACHMENT 1 1 ILI AL E) T 1 - • � . ow• .• • -mv t 1 e• saw .3t w. .AtK• •AIA;. -ltie j • i4a►t• 13.30 a+c. 41) 1 Its fo "'LoJ AF (3) N''� dpft f � • 1 1 • 1 .„ • soft 400 40 10 -- mom 410 i� dip J� now . o `! ai i 1 2 3 s s 1•i 1 N Tw WOODS IGHTS a M � low �4`) N 0 . - . u. , �, , 6 s 3 P- sEE LA �► •f Co PY a Det T�► ! + 110• Bio A o.wpm A&Z too_ 3 .48 itQ • A . n r"l. - 3� .. • �34�,3 �) (30 �t 0o V ` w 37� �' t, , (341 So sc.. • f w 0� d �3s) o i7 21 � td o .22 _ �} dw61 UQL1 o t • .3s a,o► (z�Adle (144 aoo 00 3 •20 14 ZZ� - ,C • b b M w)410 it }Lila* 21_ 1� �o . _ _ - - �-c coo •— r - �1��A[• �lwwm ' sa --- - af ass: • IN* • VA • • low _ do wee 41 w 2 2 �► 1 2 i i 2 2 • it Z 1 #• � •� "" ��IF 0 0 i _�• •=i .�) (2)o (a) (a)3 s • ��� 4 a 2 (x) 14 e s PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP ATTACHMENT 2 •dz VolIN7tiFo4044.-*ft% a a bile C.) Lje, I �Ck baAlp-- 40 IL 6�s 1� �' i S �r • � � �6 � )O*A Y:S' s s Attachment 3 S69'46'006E 163.34 • St.tt 24.03 24.03 64.40 � 1 � 1 , I . 1 1 1 1 � t � • 1 ' 1 1 B L C t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , t . 1 1 f 1 O O , O 4 0 2 3 N ,•. ;•., N •., ' , a 0 0 • , � w w 1 1 1 I ' t W 1 .Ti 1 f W • • �'_ 1 OD 1 1 0 ; eZ Foot rint of 1 Z '17 Structure 1 2 — 1 57.89--24.03 24.03 57.39 ' • - SOC36 44 163.34 1 1 1 1 f f N OUTLOT A t � � a t0 1 1 1 a 31.3 t•r 1 • = _ - o , .W N89 46 00 163.34 = N .... �• ... _ :.. . �.. PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FINAL PLAT 9 ATTACHMENT 4 Maplewood Planning Commission -2- Minutes -- Minutes 10-3-88 A . Prel i m i nary P1 at: Wood 1 ynn Heights Townhomes No. 3 Randall Johnson, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and discussed the request for prel i m i nary . and final plat approval to create four townhouse lots and an out i of . Chairman Axdahl asked if anyone in the audience wished to comment on this proposal. There were no comments. Commissioner Fischer moved the planning commission recommend approval of the Wood 1 ynn Heights Townhome5 No. 3 preliminary and final p1at. Commissioner Cardinal seconded Ayes--Axdahl. , Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal, F i of a , Fischer., Sigmundik , Sl etten 'Be PUD ev i s i on : Larp en t eur Ave. and McKnight Pd .(Hillside - Center ) Associate Pia ner Randal 1 Johnson/recommendation ted the staff reports Dan Parker the devei open with thect , said he had y reviewed the con i t i ons of the stand he was in agreement with hem. Chairman Axdahl aske if there as anyone in the audience who wished to comment on his req sted revision of the conditional use permit. There wer no c mments. The commissioners discus the past actions regarding this center. Commissioner Fischer m ved a planning commission recommend approval of the resol tion t revise the conditional use permit for the Hi l 1 side Cen er pl ann unit development to permit restuarants that re/ ply with th City's parking and BC (M) , business c ommerc i t mod i f i ed) , on i n g district requirements* Approval is for conditions of 4 one year, subject proval , amended as the original 7-27-87 11 ows in Adheren a to the site p 1 an and c d it i ons approved by the Community D sign Review Board. Future hanges to the site p 1 an may be appo owed by , the board. 2. All, uses shall conform with the BC(Ml, bus ines� commercial. (,�odifi d) zoning district requirements ahs restaurants shall also b allowed, provided that the City's parking requirements are me 0 8 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Randall Johnson, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Revision LOCATION: Hillside Center (1690 McKnight Road) APPLICANT/OWNER: CNP' .Hillside Partners MATE : September 28 ,1 1988 SUMMARY Introduction JIA- I.Wtion by Council.. a Endorsed.... M o d IL e ij Rejected.,, Date The -applicant is requesting a revision to the conditional use permit f or this commercial center to expand the Hong Kong Caf e from 700 to 1,400 square feet and to permit one or two additional restaurants to be located in Phase 2. (Refer to the applicant's letter on page 10.) Criteria for .App oval The ten findings on the resolution on page 12 must be met to approve a conditional use permits EliSCUSsion The proposed uses are appropriate for this location. Adequate parking is available to e,--.,%,pand the Hong Kong Cafe, as proposeds However there. . may not be enough parking proposed in Phase 2 to support a second restaurant. Restaurants require two to three times .the number of parking spaces as retail and office usess The police department and the applicant are unaware of any problems that are the result of this center or of the Hong Kong Cafe . Howeverg in the Citizen Comment sectiong abutting property owners state that they have experienced an increase in trespass activity since this center opened. This trespass issue has been a concern since the early to mid 1970s. To significantly reduce this trespassing, a fence would have to be constructed north of the pond, between the apartment, and townhouse propertiesq not along the applicant's north property lines As such, the applicant should not be held responsible for this situations Recommendation Approve the resolution on page 12 to revise the conditional use permit for the Hillside Center planned unit development to permit restaurants that comply with the City's parking and ESC (M), business commercial ( modified) 9 zoning district requirementso Approval is for one year,, subject to the original 7-27-87 conditions of approval, amended as -follows (deletions are crossed out and additions are underlined): i . Adherence- to the site plan Community Design Review Boards may be approved by the boards and conditions approved by the Future changes to the site plan 2* All uses shall con+ or,m with the BC (M) , business commercial ( modified) zoning district requirements and restaurants shall also e b all owed rov i ded that the -City's, ark i n requirements are meta 3a External speakers shall be directed away from the dwelling , units and the sound shall not exceed fifty decibels '(normal conversation level) at the residential property lines 4s The maximum building height shall be one story. . There shall be no exterior storage or sale of goods or merchandise. 6s the- ro osed--�onstructzoR-rntcst-ire-sut�st�nt�a��-q-started P w�t�tr�-ane- e�cr-o�-co�tr�ctf--approval--or-the-permit-steal-+-become q n t� ��-aril-�ro��i ; --A-sty-month-t�fie-e:;terts�on-T�tq-bc-requested-ems �tl•�o�+ed-�r-Sect�or�-�6-44�-�til-of-Etta-code : There shall be no vents for the underground fuel t an gy:. s within 200 feet of an existing residence or the buildable area of the planned undeveloped lots in the Currie Street Addition, south of L.arpenteur Avenue. 7a The type and anchoring of underground storage tanks must be approved Y d b the Cit Fire Marshal. The tanks shall be strapped to a concrete slabs 2 CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff surveyed 60persons who own property within 350 feet Of the Hillside Center property. Of the 30 respondehtsg six had no comment, 12 were in favor and 12 were opposed. Those in favor stated the following reasons: I am in favor unless.they will be issued a liquor licenses Staff rep y: A I iquor I icense wil I not be requested 2s My only concern would be the aesthetics of the pond. Please stress this point with the builders, Staff reply : This proposal will not effect the ponds However, the plans for Phase 2 (near the pond) have been approved subject to conditions that include: The landscape and grading plans shall be revised for staff approval providing for : as The preservation of enough existing trees along the west side of the pond to screen the proposed development from the townhouses and apartments* Additional trees may be reg uired if needed for screening& b No part of the pond may be f ill ed if the Soil Conservation Service determines that it is needed for nutrient assimilation under Section 9-191(4)(c) of the City's environmental protection ordinances ce Revising the site plan or reducing the building size if needed to comply with items c and d aboves 3, More restaurants would be an attractive and very useful, addition to the neighborhood. It would'complete an already nice center. Those opposed raised the following concerns: is Already a shopping center on the other, side of the street. Too Much congestions 2s There is no need for more restaurants in this area. I woul.d I ike to know why you continue to asi-, our opinion (townhouse association). We were opposed to the center and you allowed it to be built anyways 3s I own the Map leleaf Center (northwest of McKnight Road and Larpenteur Avenue) and I rent to Giuseppe Pizza and Ribs Pluss Staff reply: This property is planned and zoned for commercial use. The City has seriously considered pastcitizencommentse 7 'Z: The present site plan disturbs much less of the h i l I and trees along the north boundary. than would have occurred if council had not denied .the first proposal. The City cannot regulate land uses on the basis of competition with other businessese 4w You have al ready upset the environment enough. We are tired of transient traffic through and on our property (1720 McKnight Road) from the apartments to the east and the trash that is left on our property is not acceptables 5., 1 objected to Phase 1 and it didn't do much good. We already have experienced what we feared q more theft, Yandalism ., We don't need any more of it and more noises 6 n At the last hearing we attendedq we were informed this mini -mall would be fenced in so as not to have the traffic coming through the townhouse property. I would q however, approve if a family restaurant - no pizza or fast foods 78. We and the city were told Phase 2 would be off ices . We trusted the developer. Restaurants mean more garbage, rats, noise, booze andq perhapsq fights and urinating on the neighbors lawn. (Refer to page'll for additional comments.) Staff reply: Council approved this development by conditional Use permit (CUP) . No fence was required. Council also has for,lied zonin.g district rules that require a . revision to the CUP apol #_ rest8Urantss Council did this to insure that the concerns of area residents are taken into consideration. If trespassing ccant inUes to be a problem, the townhouse association should request the city council evaluate the reasons for previously prohibiting a fence to be constructed between the apartment and townhouse properties. (Refer to the Discussion section.) The pol ice chief is unaware of any increase in vandal ism or trespass problems in this areas B. They have no concrete plans for business not yet proven viable. Appears that the pond shore will be +illeds Staff comment: Refer to comment Number Two Linder persons in favor. 4 REFERENCE Past Actions This site: 7-27-87: Council approved a conditional use permit for the Hillside Center planned unit developments . Approval was subject to conditions. (Refer to the recommendation.) 7-25-88: Council approved a two-year time extension for this planned unit developments subject to the original conditions. The Hong Kong Cafe was not included in this approval a Other sites: There are no other restaurants located in a BC(M) district within the city. 9-17-81: Council reconsidered its 8-20-81 approval and denied a conditional use permit for Pizza Time Theater to operate a restaurant /video game arcade in the Hirshfield Centers south of Beam Avenue. This property is zoned for BC(M) use. No reason c -.D - for denial are listed in the minut ese Howeverg council was concerned that since this center backs up on single-dwellinci lots, cooking odors and noise would have been detected off the premises. 12-86: Council approved a conditional use permit for a Bonanza restaurant in the BC -M district, southeast of South ' awn Drive and Beam Avenues This location backs up on a double and two single- dwel 1 ing - parcel s a Pl annlng_ 1 a Section 36-436(c) of City code states: "The development shall conform to the plan as filed with the Citys Any substantive variations from the plan shall require recommendation by the planning commission and approval by the city counc'i I of ter_ a publ ic hearing." 2w Section 36-22 requires one parking space for each 200 square feet of office retail space and one parking space for each +i+tY square feet of patron area in a restaurants 3a Phase 1 has 81 parking spaces striped. (Four to be part of Phase 2 parking.) an If no - restaurant use - 62 spaces are required s ba With the Hong Kong Cafe at 700 square feet - 63 spaces are neededs ce With the Hong Kong Cafe at 1,400 square feets as presently proposed - 72 spaces are required. . 4N -The conditions of this PUD apply the BC(M) zoning district regulations to this developments Section 36-155(c) requires a conditional use permit to operate a restaurant in a BC (M) zoning district. 5w Section 36-442(b) requires ten findings to approve a conditional use permit. (Refer to the resolution on page 11.) k- d/h i I I side .mem Attachments 1• Hillside Neighborhood Land Use Plan 2a Property Line/Zoning Map 3w Site Plan 4 • Letter from the Applicant 5w Letter from Neighbor 6w Resolution • v �0 .. e . � �• �IgY.1/ nw A � r' A • E P �_ major artenaij i r • Hillside NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN � .M Attachment 1 -. _ _ , . -.. . ""<� •` - .x . �. r, _..a.. ' - '"'. t r^t _ ♦ v- r.yu:^s ti�,y-f?^�7.�:��7-[-r.�.g.grr � 1 • Holloway I .. cc A •U O W cc E Larpenteur • • WINNOW 0 -OD - • V f tri f \000 tf tom% taj %0 • t� &SI J - 04 It ,R•tell N• • • ,' 1: �•�f ' � ley • 1� ��.� a • }' G tw � �•� �» Grp e3it • � h . lot t0 �,J � tt !�'� -,�,• _ _�1s.+._ _b! ";" . ,WILLIAM8 BROTHERS PIPELINE•' O`p � • • • • • 44 FA 0 tot I OF* • s� ♦~ a� t ♦ ; 7� 40book, 40• r�•t • y�.. �. tri f � ." ' � � _ • � � d � � M r tb N K. �It /� • M � • � •.. _w ODOM3all C. I .' , to ; t.. �' t ��:�► �; so ••.� •so do _ ' frAa • • r • Y Y • . .11709 � . t � � � tz •.. , ,.• S 1 d 4t%•0••4000% �• s• ro40 to .�.... w169 • • 3 • • � .V". 01_nw' N i� • � i�� .~``•.i MAPLEWO�� _ N & 0 / to 3 0 Mos. AF ARTMENTS 12251. : 3 � • - - - - - _ _ • V Ply is won • ,• • ■�-■ai■a�:�■� ei�■-�Rp���R■ss■�s■■■■■mass■t■sss■■s■uI ; .��••••�s����w�•�•�•••••• 4040 tii"PIP t ST. PAUL •, • :•, At 40 W ; t C,, , oil" _ ��'� • 334IL • 1:�� . PROPOSED CAVE'S sr�•�,.: y Vi ��� �t�.•��1� � o� .a- Q . _ CURRIE STREET ADD'N 4�� k�� w to •„�. . 4000. i 4000 •�• � • O Ix ool H IT.LCREST • . .� s.�•� •: -- •- •• - •% 0y GOLF COURSE1101010 • �-� <<��», . .. - .• 00 00 - 110 gs • ;� t sow,. RI. •JO,—. WDso — jr 4 dw 410 WIMMOP0M PROPERTY LINE I ZONING MAP N. 8 . Attachment 2 ... .� 0000. ., ... ,�., ,.. —.. _., ._.. 0__000 .. .. ,c•.. -^-0,:;,000... rq.r a; _,ws•,<.�r_a:a•:N-. w� 0040,•-; �.�..,,rr•R.,,.-: <g •a --- �_•�-w»....,;.a.,.-e -.,,a :-�-_^„ e•_.,•.,:- � .. s • - 1 Gomm "Wet Pon" &too 1 • Awes. SAO 1 • 1 � 1 � • �• •. 4•• • . ,1am • '� ... ��` Q it =•.Y :•• :•" .• •:. ; .•.•�•. . • 1 ••' F (� � � • ♦ li Phase 1 '� ; • r`r I / i• .. . • . •1 . .•11'1 ::1•:•• ._1. :It' •_.. � •' Phase 2 � • ---, wo . % ` ♦` ♦ , 0. • •1 ♦ 1 1 1 .00 elw OlMl M_ • 1 •.•.fir• • w .r••• a i - Larpenteur Avenue O Site Plan isolr• 1' i arw i Hong Kong Cafe • .. m - Proposed Expansion of Hong Kong Cafe 3 • - 1 Gomm "Wet Pon" &too 1 • Awes. SAO 1 • 1 � 1 � • �• •. 4•• • . ,1am • '� ... ��` Q it =•.Y :•• :•" .• •:. ; .•.•�•. . • 1 ••' F (� � � • ♦ li Phase 1 '� ; • r`r I / i• .. . • . •1 . .•11'1 ::1•:•• ._1. :It' •_.. � •' Phase 2 � • ---, wo . % ` ♦` ♦ , 0. • •1 ♦ 1 1 1 .00 elw OlMl M_ • 1 •.•.fir• • w .r••• a i - Larpenteur Avenue O Site Plan isolr• 1' i arw i Hong Kong Cafe • .. m - Proposed Expansion of Hong Kong Cafe 3 NWshCompanies July 29, 1988 Mr. Geoff Olson City of Maplewood 1830 East.County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 RE: Application for P.U.D. Hillside Center 1690 McKnight Road Dear Mr. Olson Welsh Companies, Inc. 11200 Wiest 78th Street Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 612.944.5810 CNP Hillside Partners, the.owners of the Hillside Center, are formally requesting a special use permit to permit the operation of restaurants in Phase I and Phase II of the Hillside Shopping Center. In Phase I, the. Hong Kong Cafe currently operates in approximately 700 feet of the center. We are proposing to expand the Hong Kong Cafe into the store adjacent to it currently occupied by Anderson Cleaners so that the total square footage for this restaurant would be approximately 1,400 square feet. In Phase II we anticipate having additional food service uses,I most likely a pizza or Italian restaurant and perhaps an ice cream or yogurt shop. We do not have commitments from either one of these uses, or any other food uses for that matter, so it is impossible to know specifically what our square footage allocated to restaurants would be. As you will note, our original plans have more than adequate parking for the uses proposed. Under BCM, while we cannot define specifically how many square feet yet would be set aside for food uses, we would anticipate that they would be within the parking guidelines required by the City of Maplewood. We are requesting no changes in the P.U.D. as approved by the City Council, nor any of the conditions attached thereto. We are simply requesting the ability to expand an existing restaurant and to provide restaurants in Phase II of our project* We appreciate the support of the City of Maplewood and request the issuance of the special use permit for our shopping center. Very tru ours Daniel N. Parker CNP Hillside Partners DNP/ lmy Real Estate Development • Construction • Brokerage • Property Management • Investment Services 10 Attachment 4 f �� /� �T' fG� yO vivc �r4M Ll /C�� 4.1 go va vp ' v� � f fa, j- fie' iv M � .✓ 8 v / � � �°r- t �� c� v � �ti'a��•'PT'i f.�. o •� I c IV 'r 4FA#IOOI C.,OOV %,j tF LC),Oov A,/ S`7""S dMEM 0 40 Cd o rAP plsew. eJA 0 0 0 400e LAJ V o aA0000f, 7 i JAI IU )C�4 _ca;oov7 /,ov eoo e5AOOO** t 7--0 u t� �r vim/o J~r Ova /Y110 6:"o MS�%o . r., C: > o 0.'.. . . . �o y�L�ivT 48=d000lp i�osop � � Attachment 5 I Pursuant to due cal l'aid notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewoods Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of 1988 at 7 pems The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS,; CNP Hillside Partners initiated a revision to the conditional use permit to include restaurants. The property is 1ec3al1y described as: Lot 3, Block 19 Map I ewoods Estates This property is also known as 1690 McKnight Road, Maplewood; WHEREAS ,'the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as fol 1 ows: in This conditional use permit revision was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on — 1) 1988 Theplanning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be 2s The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 9 1988. Notice thereof was pub lished ,and mailed PUrsuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements, The council also considered reports and - recommendations of the city staff and planning commissions NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL THAT the above-described conditional use permit revision be approved on the basis of the following f findings -of -fact : in The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapters 2s The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3s The use would be locatedq design,edg maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning districts 4e The use would ,not depreciate property valuess 12 Attachment 6 5a The use would not be hazardousq detrimental or disturbing to P resent and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare q smoke., dust odor f umes water pol I ut ion water run -of f vibrat i on general unsightliness,, electrical interference or other nuisances* 69 The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congest ion g unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area propert.iess 710 The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as stre.etsg police, fire protect ion q gut ilitiesq schools and parkess Be The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and Would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 90 The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development designs 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental ef+ectso Approval is subject to the following conditions: is Adherence to the site plan and conditions approved by the Community Design Review Board. Future changes to the site plan may be approved by the boards 2s All uses shall conform with the ESC (M), business commercial (modified) zoning district requirements and restaurants shall also be allowed, provided that the-City*os parking requirements are meta 3a External speak-ers shall be directed away from the dwelling units and the sound shall 'not exceed fifty decibels (normal conversation level) at the residential property lines 4s The ma%,-,,,imum building height shall be one story* 5s There shall be no exterior storage or sale of goods or merchandises 6. If the alleged trespass incidents are determined to be caused by persons traveling to or from the Hillside Centerg the owner of the Hillside Center shall have until May 319 1989 to construct a fence or other suitable pedestrian barrier along the north property lines Any, Such barrier to be constructed shall be approved by the Community Design Review Boards 7a There shall be no vents for the underground fuel tanks within 200 feet of an existing residence or the buildable area of the planned undeveloped lots in the Currie Street Addition, south of Larpenteur Avenues Be The type and anchoring of underground storage tanks must be approved by' the City Fire Marshal The tanks shal I be strapped to a concrete slabs 13 4 • Adopted this day of , 1988 . Seconded by Ay es -- STATE OF -MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSE Y ) SS . CITY OF MAP'LEWOOD ) I., the undersigned , being the dul y qual if i ed and appointed c l erk of the City of Map 1 ewood , Minnesota , . do hereby certify that I have. carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of 19889 with the original on file in my office, and the same is a f ul l , true and complete transcript insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permits Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 19880 City Cl erg: City of Maplewood 14 Maplewood Planning Commission Minutes 10-3-88 I A Prel imina y PI at: Wood ynn eights Townhomes No. 3 Randall Johnsong ssociate PI ner, presented the staff report and discussed the quest f preliminary and final plat approval to create f r to house lots'and . an but lot., Chairman Axdahl asked i anyone in the audience wished to comment on this propo In There were no comments* Commissioner Fisch moved t e planning commission recommend approval of the W d ynn Heig s Townhomes, No. 3 preliminary and final plate Commissioner rdinal seconded yes--Axdahls Ayersq rrett, Cardinal 9 Fiola, F cher, Sigmund ik, Sletten Be PUD Rev is.ion: Lamp enteur Ave. and McKnight Rd. (Hillside Center) Associate Planner Randall Johnson presented the staff reports Dan Park er5 the developer with this projectg said he had reviewed the conditions of the staff recommendation and he was in agreement with them. Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to comment on this requested revision of the conditional use permit. There were no comments. The commissioners discussed the past actions regarding this centers Commissioner Fischer moved the planning commission recommend approval of the resolution to revise the conditional use permit for the Hillside Center planned unit development to permit restuarants that comply with the City's parking and BSC (M) business commercial (mod ified),v zoning district requirementse Approval is for one yearg subject to the original 7-27-87 conditions of approval, amended as follows: is Adherence to the site plan and conditions approved by the Community Design Review Board. Future changes to the site plan may be approved by the boards 2a Al I uses shat I conform with the BC (M) , business commercial (modified) zoning district requirements and restaurants shall also be allowed ,9 provided that the City's parking requirements are met* Maplewood Planning Commission -.3 Minutes 3Minutes 10-3-88 3. External speakers shall be directed away from the dwelling units and the sound shall not exceed fifty decibels ( normal conversation level) at the residential, property line. 4s The maximum building height shall be one story. 5e There shat i be no exterior storage or sale of goods or merchandise. 6s There shat 1 be no vents for the underground fuel tanks within 200 feet of an existing residence or the buildable area of the planned undeveloped lots in the Currie Street Addition, south of Larpenteur Avenue. 7s The type and anchoring of underground storage tank s ' must be approved by the City Fire Marshal . The tanks shat 1 be strapped to a concrete slabs Commissioner Ayers seconded Ayes---Axdahl, Ayers, Burrett , Card i nal , F i of a , Fischer, Larson , S1 etten C . Street \Vac at i on : _ English Ste The staff rep'qrt was presented. There was no representative pq�esent for the applicant Metro Imported Autos. The commissionersV�*nga screening needs on the east side of the property bordsidentiail area. Associate P1anner�Randall Johnson ss business was expanded a conditional use pd be required and this concern would be addressed at t Commissioner Ayers 6ve the planning commission recommend approval of the Yeept lutio to vacate English Street north of Kohl man Avenue, the south ten feet for the future widening of Kohl Avenue. Approval is on the basis that 1. The adjoi ng propertyHers have no interest in improving the treat. 2. The adj fining properties h ve adequate street access. 3. This�treet segment is not nded for area traffic circulati n or emergency vehicle a cess. Ap p rova is subject to retaining a p'atrman en t t wen t y -f oot -w i d e public ut i l i ty easement and a temporary forty -foot -wide utility c on st ruc t i on easemen t* . _. � .... .. . _' .' _'. ...._ .... _. ._.'... _._... _.. _.... ... .. . .... ... ... ... _�.. .. �.-............s-.�„n... .e..-,w.n ..s ->r _. :....-a ..•4T!h.0 :.t!S[ .._K!�!+PRY.!a_.°�.. �. _,._.... :C_a.7J!,'7�. t".',��:�P. ,...-,_.r ..... r�w.s: 1.Y. . .J.S. .a _ .,,. ... .._ �.. !. •-•� _ inn gyp, 'r'•YIC” nr�17'*I.T'�T-• ..� Ft 6 I On by Counci I MEMORANDUM Endorsee TO: City Manager R e 0 t e FROM: Associate Planner --Johnson' SUBJECT: Street Vacation APPLICANT: Metro Imported Autos (Porche/Audi ) LOCATION: English Street, North of Kohl -man Avenue DATE: September 23, 19ee SUMMARY Introduction The ' app licant is requesting the vacation of an unimproved portion of English Street right-of-way that is located between the Porche/Audi dealership and kohl man Avenue. Porshe/Audi wants to purchase the north 300 feet of 1293 Kohl man Avenue to expand their parking lot, Back'ground A study was prepared in 1981 to determine the feasibility of constructing English Street, north of Koh lman Avenue. Two alternative cul -de -sacs were Studied. (See plan on page 5) . The longer cul-de-sac was found to be cost -prohibitive, due to the need for extensive fill because of poor, soils. A cul-de-sac from K*ohlman Avenue, to about 250+ feet north was determined to be feasible. Required Finding - Chapter 412.851 of state law states that "Council may, by 'resolution., vacate any street. if it appears the interest of the pub] ic to do son a a Discussion The owners of 1293 and 1309 Koh lman Avenue have stated that they are not interested in constructing any portion of Engl ish Street. They have no interest in subdividing the ,northerly portions of their properties. Each of the adjoining properties has adequate street access, therefore, there is no publ is need to construct this street. Recommendation Approve the resolution on page 6 to vacate English Street north of Koh lman Avenue, except the south ten feet for the future widening of Kohl man. Avenue. Approval is on the basis that: . The adjoining property owners have no interest in improving the street. 2e The adjoining properties have adequate street access.. 3s This street segment is not needed for area traffic circulation or emergency vehicle access* Approval is subject to retaining a permanent twenty -foot -wide public utility easement and a temporary forty -f oot-w.ide utility construction easement. REFERENCE Description of the Street Right-of- The ight-of-The subject right-of-way is unimproved. It is 73 f eet wide adjacent to 1293 and 1309 Kohl man Avenue . East of the Porche-Audi dealership it is 40 feet wide. ( Refer to the map on page 4.) Surrou nd i n2 Land Uses North: An extension of the subject right -of -way , through KSTP' s tower property. East: k:STP and a single dwelling at 1309 Koh 1 man Avenue South: Koh 1 man Avenue. The right -o+ -way is only 40 feet wide. (Minimum code is sixty feet.) West: The Porc he/Audi dealership and a single dwelling at 1293 Koh 1 man Avenue. P'ub l i c Works 1. There are no utility pipes within the right-of-ways However, the potential e:: i sts to route a storm sewer along this corridor. Permanen i; and temporary construction easement should be retained. . Koh 1 man Avenue is only forty -feet wide. The south ten feet of this right-of-way should be retained in the event Kohl man Avenue is widened to the required mini mum of sixty feet. mb Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Feasibility -English Street Improvement 4. Resolution ( Street Vacation) 2 Interchange Vadnals Heights 0 0 0 z E oil Interchange I • major :1 J L# .OWN= erlal minor • ' sc M 04,50 La os cam A! L L OS .=-� FIN RL. 00 c • 3: HAZELWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN - Attachment 1 major collector, -sl 0 d' da r..,. -L�Co, :3=7(l r , BW 0 0 0 z E oil Interchange I • major :1 J L# .OWN= erlal minor • ' sc M 04,50 La os cam A! L L OS .=-� FIN RL. 00 c • 3: HAZELWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN - Attachment 1 .�• •s �'' s ��• �`� 6EAM &left��. :: rAV .E all SIT OF It of v ir% ,•� •►� o .... ff7.%;�'ie�s.t �'lroim• •MsT1p •V7l�t 3 :.1� • ��• _ ►ART OEaw • �' i 1 A41. lTJr�• �LltT i • 4 • AAO.21O - Ass 7 Is 7 to 67 e3 . • .' T.• --, �� - '.-. ,• :.. �.. Proposed by Staff for ,.,.., Vacation (Hous eke"I";,. .i. eP n9) gas V o KSTP �,,,__ ' "' ':'��� _ •�''' ; �,• ••„ ' O Studio '01 : = K STP Tower' 79 • co Metro ImIN. ported ;Auto- . '�'! �� 1 JA also Al Naumannjo :T oil �� ,. f .f = s •� ,' oil R �� V 10 16 lot AL tq~i, ) I 1 � � s � J >a �. ti ► • y � • ,! Q �•: G C S 'y • W i� ob ♦- �' �: �.' ~ •'• a •% ` 1 I f J 309 1 . ..1.. r:I J tw = / 1293 d ' ' • ; 0, 1309 4. , •... 0 L MAN /► v•; • m �,�� Q 1 It ..; / • Was �i •i ft ,4 L'•� �Ir:� ,�) �: 1 .1, 40 • : • J � • _ . •ra .q.J . �i . • , � ti.. ' f ~ • 1 I „� : '!s. . ~ 48 43 ss *A *go .... � i ��/ � i � • J 1 r•• • ifs � � iry � h � � v' : � � ; ,. ; <J. •� .' f / • _, / 50 J �. , ` i .i) Z = `.�/ , 1 ;. ■ . 1• '�3) S 1i • 1 • • eL -COUNTY ROAD ' : & —L ,,,i ` •• c fir• i., 0. So • C C PROPERTY LINE / 1.0 MAP- 4 Attachment .2 4" FM • .�y/� (ABANDONED) EASEMENT! R E RE OUI 0 . l�oR CUL-ot . :::: sic ging .... •.:: December 7. 1981 Staff '' •��" Recommendation,•• ` �'' �� :::::: "Both alternatives are feasible to c - --_-_ onstruct, _ but Al ternative Two -` o W -- •.'���• ----- • 8 W '- �s S S considered to be cost- - _ - -__ - - excessive for the bene- fit to be provided due ALTERNATIVE VE 1 to the need for extensive subgrade correction and fill." / V-201 EASEMENT REQUIRED -- 4 FM _ (ABAND0' Q EASEMENTS '• REQUIRED .' .74..:L<73:::: LEGEND • NG SANITARY SEWER EXISTING WATER MAIN PROPOSED SANITAR Y : •: SEWER PROPOSED WATERMA I IV PROPOSED STOR � SEWER �•.:'•:•. � PROPOSED S TREET .. ETITIONINa' PROPEtTIES - •f: S W _ SS- -�dub - '.. HL W ALTERNATIVE 2 • • - ENGLIS11 STREET FROM ICO wE NtTE ZOO Noll STREET T AND UTILITY IMPROVE Q�MENTS 000 � MINNESOTA PROJECT No. 81-11 Maplewood Planning Commission -3- Minutes 10-3-88 3e Extern'I speakers shall be. d irecte away from the dwelling f t units and t sound shall not exceed y decibels (normal conversation Vls.ftevel) at the resident* I property line. 4. The max imum\t)uil ding height/shall be one story. 5a There shall be o ex t er i r storage or sale of goods or merchandise. 6a There shall be no v)(nts for the underground fuel tanks 0 within 200 feet of an 1 ing residence or the buildable area of the planned undeve.oped ots in the Currie Street Addition, south of Larpenteur venue. 7a The type an anchoring of nderground storage tanks must type -an anchoring n e .op ed en be approved by he City Fire Mar al The tanks shat I be strapped to a concrete slab. Commission r Ayers seconded A es--Axdahl,, Ayers, Ba ett, Cardinal, Fiolal, Fisc er, Larson, Sletten ce Street Vacation: - English St. The staff report was presented. There was no representative present for the applicant, Metro Imported Autos. The commissioners discussed screening needs on the east side of the property bordering a res ident. ial area. Associate Planner Randall Johnson said if this business was expanded a conditional use permit would be required and this concern would be addressed at that time. Commissioner Ayers moved the planning commission recommend approval of the resolution to vacate English Street north of Koh lman Avenue, except the south ten feet for the future widening. of Kohlman Avenue. Approval is on the basis that: in The adjoining property owners have no interest in improving the street. 2. The adjoining properties have adequate street access. 3w This street segment is not needed for area traffic circulation or emergency vehicle access. Approval is subject to retaining a permanent twenty -foot -wide public utility easement and a temporary forty -foot -wide utility construction easement. Maplewood Planning Commission Minutes 10-3-88 Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes--Axdahl Ayers, Barrett, Fiola, Fischer, Larson,, Sletten Nays --Cardinal Do Preliminary Plat: Torg erson Addition The staff repkrt was presented to the commission. Don and Lorrain Torgerson, the applicant. 1e22 Desoto Street, were present at e meeting. Torg' applicant t e m' Chairman Axdahl op ned the public hear* ng . One person in the audience spoke in o osition to the p oposed Tcr-jerson addition. Assistant City Engines 4Bruce Iris discussed the City's ponding system in the a a. Commissioner Fischer move the pJlanning commission recommend the city council: in Authorize the construct n n a of storm sewer al on the 14 to t 20 -percent sl op 1 ocated ea of proposed Burr Street and the proposed cul-de-sac i on the a s that due to the extreme topography, there is no of er p actical place to route the required storm sewer. 2a Deny the requested ariationsfrom the platting code to create a temporary, hal -width str\et and a temporary cul -de- sac sac in excess of 1,000 feet of I engt on the basis that: a. Approval w uld adversely of ct the spirit of the n i -v i f\ subdivision co and the comprehe ive plan, because public safety' ability to. provide imel y emergency 0 e vehicle cervi f could be hampered o jeopardized. b A f ul I width through street is a reasonable alternativ. This alternative was plan ed for by the City I when appr al was granted for the Twin ks Addition to I the Hort and the Markfort Addition to th west. ce AVO roval is not essential to the reas able N develo ment of this subdivision. d is ouncil has required full -width, through streets to be Ifaranteed across adjoining properties as a condition • 00 of for other similar proposals. The applicant is requesting approval of the fol I owing: 1 a A preliminary plat to create 17 single -dwelling lots and two Gaut lotso 2 App ' roval to route utilities along a corridor with more than eight percent of grade. 3, Two variations from the platting code: a Variation One: The applicant is proposing a temporary, 20 -foot -wide, paved access drive to Desoto Street. They want the city to condemn for the remainder of the street right-of-way at a later date. Section 30-8 (b) (2) states "The use of half - width streets shall be prohibited, except where essential to the reasonable development of the subdivision in conformity with the other requirements of these regulations and the overall plan of the neighborhood in which the plat is situated a off be Variation Two: The applicant is proposing a temporary. cul-de-sac that would be about, 1 9750 f eet I ong. This cul -de-sac is proposed because a full -width street is not proposed through to Desoto Street (Variation One) Section 30-8 (b) (3) states "Cul -de-sacs . when used , shal I be hel d to as short a distance as possible between the origin or main street and the end of the cul -de -sacs. In no case shall cul-de-sacs exceed one thousand (1 9000) feet in length, unless no other alternative is possible." Acti . on 15y Coir ncil:-v MEMORANDUM Endorsed -,.-- Mo TO City Manager Rejected_ FROM: Randy Johnson, Associate Planner Date, SUBJECT: Torgerson Addition LOCATION: Desoto Street and Ripley Avenue APPLICANT: Donald and Lorraine Torgerson OWNERS: Donald and Lorraine Torgerson, Erik Oeli-..-er,, Jean Edhol m,, John Lund Leo Mare: +ort and Dennis Cummins DATE: September 289 1.988 SUMMARY Introduction The applicant is requesting approval of the fol I owing: 1 a A preliminary plat to create 17 single -dwelling lots and two Gaut lotso 2 App ' roval to route utilities along a corridor with more than eight percent of grade. 3, Two variations from the platting code: a Variation One: The applicant is proposing a temporary, 20 -foot -wide, paved access drive to Desoto Street. They want the city to condemn for the remainder of the street right-of-way at a later date. Section 30-8 (b) (2) states "The use of half - width streets shall be prohibited, except where essential to the reasonable development of the subdivision in conformity with the other requirements of these regulations and the overall plan of the neighborhood in which the plat is situated a off be Variation Two: The applicant is proposing a temporary. cul-de-sac that would be about, 1 9750 f eet I ong. This cul -de-sac is proposed because a full -width street is not proposed through to Desoto Street (Variation One) Section 30-8 (b) (3) states "Cul -de-sacs . when used , shal I be hel d to as short a distance as possible between the origin or main street and the end of the cul -de -sacs. In no case shall cul-de-sacs exceed one thousand (1 9000) feet in length, unless no other alternative is possible." City staff is recommending the rezoning of this property and the properties adjoining to the west, from F, farm residence, to R-19 single dwellings This change would eliminate the potential for any farm -related uses that may be incompatible with a singl e- dwel 1 ing neighborhood . Required Finding Section 30-11 states "Council may approve variations from the requirements of this sub -d i v i s i on code- in specific cases which, in its opinion, do not adversely effect the plan and spirit of this chapter." discussion Storm Sewer Grade: The applicant's proposal to run storm sewer along a slope wit h greater than an eight percent grade is justified. This property mist drain to a storm water pond to be 1 ocated in the southeast corner of the sites A 14 to 20 -percent grade slope borders the west side of this pond. Storm sewer down the slope is required to prevent excessive erosion and to insure this steep slope will remain stables Hal f -Width Street and Excessive Length Cul -De -Sac: These variation requests from the platting code do not comply with the required findings for approval . They have been proposed because the applicant has not been able to acquire the additional 35 x 163+ f oot parcel f rom 1,790 Desoto that is needed to construct a -full-width street through to Desoto Street. The owner of 1790 Desoto Street states he is not opposed to a street, provided he is fairl y compensated . I+ the purchase of the right -o+ -way cannot be negotiated , then council should use its condemnation authority. This street corridor has been anticipated by the city s ince the Twin Oaks Subdivision, which abets to the north, was approved in 1984. This issue should be resolved as part of the applicant's conditions of approvals I f .a pub l i c improvement is necessary, it shoul d be 1 i m i ted to acquisition of the right -o+ -way . There would be very little assessable frontage, there+ ore , the appl icant , being the primary bene+ iciary should pay for the street. The proposed temporary 25-+oot-wide access is also unacceptable because timely emergency -vehicle access cannot be guaranteed for the future area residents. This access would be too narrow for two-way traffic, even if posted for no parking. Several of the ex i st i n.g homeowners along Bellwood Avenue are also concerned that without a street through to Desoto Street that excessive traffic would result on Bellwood Avenue. Some of these persons purchased 2 their property with the understanding that Ripley Avenue would be constructed through to Desoto Streets Recommendation is . Authorize the construction of storm sewer along the 14 to 20 -percent slope,, located east of proposed Burr Street and the proposed cul-de-sacq on the basis that due to the extreme - topography, there is no other practical pl ace to route the required storm sewer 2. Deny the requested variations from the platting code to create a temporary, hal-F-width. street and a temporary cul-de-sac in excess of 1 000 feet of length, on the basis that: Approval would adversely effect the spirit of the subdivision code and the comprehensive plan, because public safety 's abil i t y to provide timely emergency vehicle service could be hampered or jeopardized W b. A +uI I -width , through street is a reasonabl e alternative. This alternative was planned for by the city when approval was granted for the Twin Oak.s Addition to the north and the Mark+ort Addition to the west. c Approval is not essential to the reasonable development of this subdivisions do Council has required +ull.-wid.th, through streets to. be guaranteed across adjoining properties as a condition of approval +or other similar proposalss 3s Approve the Torgersen Addition preliminary platq Subject to sat is+action of the following conditions before application for final plat approval: a The city signing a contract (s) to construct the downstream drainage improvements to outlet this and adjoining property to Round Lake. The city engineer may approve a phased development plang provided the ap * pl ican t can demonstrate that on-site ponding capacity will be adequate to maintai 'n predevel opment storm water f I ows f rom this site. Any lot or street area not included in the initial phase shall be platted asanoutlot until adequate storm water capacity is provideds The entire right-of-way for Burr Street- and -Ripl ey Avenue shat I be pl atted and constructed with the first phases b City or applicant acquisition of the 35 by 1631 foot parcel needed to construct Ripl ey Avenue as a +ul I -width street through to Desoto Street - If a city project 9 the applicant shat I pay -the cost of the +easibil ity study and all. other city expenses to acquire this right-of-wayg including attorney's +eess 3 C . Substitute a drainage easement for out 1 of B. The property lines for, the adjoining lots shall be extended through the easement to the south or east boundaries of the site. The easement shat 1 include al l area that woul d be up to one foot above the approved 100 -year storm design el evat i on f or this pond. This easement steal 1 al so 1 ine up with the existing drainage easement on the properties to the east. do Outl of A shall be combined with an adjacent property. A deed shat P be in the possession of the adjoining property owner before the plat is signed by the city. .The deed to transfer ownership of this out 1 of shall stipulate that this property is to be combined with adjoining property to form one parcel , to be described' by one property tax description member . e . The f of 1 owing street names shat 1 be shown (1) The north half of the existing Ripley Avenue right -o+ -way shall be shown between the west line of Bradley Avenue and the east boundary of the site. (^) "Ripley Avenue" shall be shown west of the south e:;tension of the west 1 ine of proposed Lot One, Block One. (3) The remainder of the through street shat 1 be named "Burr Street". (4) The cul-de-sac shall be named "Summer Court". f . Reduce the width of Lots One, Two, Five and Six , Eel ock Two, to the minimum permitted to maximize the rear yard area for Lots Three and Four. go City engineer approval of final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans. These plans shall include, but not be limited to: (1) Identification of the trees to be saved. These trees shall also be identified on the site. (2) Revision of the grading plan and/or install storm sewer along the north boundary of the site to insure that drainage from this site does not f 1 ow into the properties to the north. (3) Where possible to obtain grading easements on adjoining property, make a more gentle transition Al ong the site boundary to the lots adjoining to the north and northeast. 4 • (4) Provide survey evidence that Ripley Avenue will lineup with existing Ripley Avenueg west of Desoto Streets he Submission o+,%signed developer's agreement and surety for all required public improvements, including but not I smite d to: a +ul I -width street through to Desoto Street and on-site util itY and drainage improvements; any required tree planting; erosion control measures; relocation of the NSP utility pole that will be within the new Ripley Avenue right-o-f-wavg and, relocation of the driveway for 1822 Desoto Street to Ripley Avenues 4s Approve the resol'ution on page 17 to approve the rezoning of this site and the singl e-dwel 1 ing I ots to the west from F, farm residence, to R-1 singl e -dwell -1 ing residence Approval is on the basis that the potential for nuisance related farm usesq such ar3 the raising of I ivestock in a singl e-dwel 1 ing neighborhood, WOUl d be eliminatedd CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff surveyed 57 persons who own property within 350 feet of this sites Of the 29 respondents9 nine do not objectil four had no commentg 15 are opposedg and one wanted more information before commentings The person who wanted more information raised the following concerns: I W . hat about drainage? Would this (project) be done with ponding and a] I cost go . ing to the developer?. Our neighborhood, ass it is now, has adequate drainage but if this (site) is developed.will the nearby neighbors be assessed for storm sewers--' With the cost of everything going up and up, it is getting to be impossible for middle-class people to live in this neighborhoods Staff reply: The storm sewer system is not complete upstream or downstream of this or adjoining properties. The developer would be obl igated to pay for. al I on-site drainage improvements. A city improvement project is needed to construct the majority of the o++ -site improvementse This past May, the city council tabled a drainage improvement project for this area. The city engineer was directed to research alternative financing options, A condition of this proposal will be the construction of all planned ponds and storm sewers between this site and ROUnd Lakes What will the price range of the homes be? What is the rE�putation of the developer? Staff reply: The applicant has not chosen a builder. The homes will be priced consistent with the new' -homes in this areas 3s What is the developer's intention for Out lot A? It should be combined with 1856 Desoto Streets Staff reply: The applicant wants to sel I it to one of the adjoining owners or split it and sell a portion to each abutting owner,, if a satisfactory price can be agreed upon. 4s Will the construction equipment access the site from Desoto Street or Bellwood Avenue? We don't believe it to be appropriate to have the construction equipment tear up newly constructed Bellwood Avenue* If any damage is caused to existing streets or underground utilities during constructiong will the repairs be the developer's responsibility? Staff reply: The developer will be required to enter into a developer's agreement and submit a monetary surety to guarantee compliance. If he breaks any existing public improvement or otherwise damages property, he will be held accountables Those in favor offered the following comments: The devel opment .wool d bring added tax revenue f or the county and increase the value of area residences. 2a It will eliminate a persistent fire hazards rodent problems and put. the property on the 'tax rol I s Those opposed raised the following concerns: is I am opposed to this project If it hinges on .the city's proposed storm sewer proposal for this area We do not want to pay for a sewer for their new homes. Staff reply: Refer to comment number one for the person who. wanted more informations We do not want to I ose the wooded area and wil dl if e. That is the reason we movedhere. Level ing of the I and wil I of +ect the beauty and privacy. of my backyard Without I evel ing,, I fear a drainage probl em Our children and the children of those who move in will need some wildlife (open) areas accessible to them. Staff reply: On May 14, 1984, the citv amended the land use plan for this vicinity to delete a planned neighborhood park. The reasons were as follows: as There is inadequate population potential to support this pari;!-, given that the Edgerton School grounds and Edgerton Park are within its planned service area and only two blocks aways be The stop lights at Edgerton Street provide safe pedestrian access from south of Rosel awn Avenue to. the Edgerton Park facilities. CU The cost for acquisition and development would be high. do Nearly one-fourth of the site would be unusable because of steep slopes and a storm water pond. This site is . now planned for single -dwelling development. Maplewood cannot prohibit development .that is consistent with its plans and ordinancesq unless the property is purchased for public use. Neither the city nor Ramsey County have plans to purchase this site. 3w Too crowdedq need more open spaces Staff reply: The planned density for this property is 14 persons per net acre. The applicant is proposing 10.9 people per net h acres These lots will average 169399 square feet9 whereas the six lots to the west average 159640 square feet and the .lots in the Twin Oaks subdivisiong abutting to the northq average 11,565 sqcare .feet . Code requires a minimum of 10,000 square feet of lot areas 40 For proper fire and emergency vehicle access, Burr Street should not be permitted as proposeds It should be a standard width street9 through to Desoto Streets Burr Street should be built through to Desoto Street so that all of the traffic will not have to be routed through the existing neighborhood or Bellwood Avenues Staff reply: A condition of approval will be to make a standard - width street connection through to Desoto Street. This street connection has been anticipated since Bellwood Avenue was constructed. Also, when Ripley Avenue was constructed, west of Elesoto Street, a condition of approval was to line up with this anticipated street connection. No other practical through -street alignment to Desoto Street exists. due to steep slopes, a required pond or existing homes& 5. 1 1 ik-e the dead end (west end of Bel 1 wood Avenue) the way it is, That. is what enticed me to buy my lot* Staff reply: This dead end was not intended to be permanent. The developer was allowed to build a temporary cul-de-sac (asphalt rather than concrete curb and gutter) which is to be removed when the connection to Desoto Street is made. Long dead ends, such as thisq are prohibited by code, unless there is no other alternatives Long dead ends can cause life-threatening delays in the delivery C+ emergency vehicle servicesa 6a My lot at 536 Bellwood Avenue has a hill adjoining proposed Lot Three, Block. Twos Extensive grading will be necessary. The cul-de-sac should be shorteneds We do not want the trees on the hillside disturbeds Staff reply: No grading is proposed within five feet of 536 Bellwood Avenues The applicant is proposing to leave the extreme northeast corner of his site intacts Staff is proposing that additional grading should be undertaken, with the permission of the adjoining property owners to eliminate as much of the steep drop off as possible along the site boundarys The applicant must inventory all trees located on the sitee Any trees greater than four inches in diameter that would be removed are subject to replacementg up to a maximum of ten trees per acre. Several trees will likely be lost to the street constructions' In this case, the public need for a through -street outweighs the desire to preserve treess n REFERENCE 1% Site Descri pt ion Gross area: 7s62 acres Existing land use: undeveloped Surrounding Land Uses North: Five single dwellings and Burr Street right of way. A temporary cul-de-sac was constructed until Burr Street is constructed into this sites East Four dr ,a dwellings and a storm dainage easement. South: Singl e-dwel 1 ing property and Ripl ey Avenue riqht-of -way (Ripley Avenue, west of Bradley Street ., has been vacated. See Past Act ions e) West Desoto Street and five single dwellings. The dwelling at 1B.'2_2 Desoto has a south facing garage that wool d be set back 30 feet from the proposed street. The garage for 1790 Desoto Would encroach upon the proposed future street right -o+ -way. The dwel I i n g woul d be set bacit- 49,.5 f eet.. The rept acement garage may. have to be partially cut into the hillside to obtain an acceptable driveway grades An NSPpower pole is located within the corridor proposed to be Ripley Avenues Past Actions This site: Council vacated the street easement that had encumbered the northwesterly 30 -foot -wide portion of this site (Outlot A) adjacent to the north line of 1854 Desoto Streets I 5-14-84: in Council amended the comprehensive plan to delete a neighborhood park' that had been planned for this vicinitya (Refer to the Citizen Comments section, persons opposed, for the reasons*) 2w Council vacated ' Ripl 'ey Avenue (only the south half existed) betwee I n the west line of Bradley Street and Desoto Streets A utility easement was kept over the entire right -o+ -way in the event it woul d be needed f or the area storm sewer. OnI y a 20- -Foot -wide section will be used near Bradley Streets --The remainder can be vacateds Other sites: 1 a Through -street as a condition of plat approval : 6-8-87: Council approved Gonyea's Oak Heights preliminary plate A condition of approval was that a construction contract had to be entered into to guarantee a through -street to either Highwood Avenue or Sterling Street before Snowshoe Lane . or Lakewood Drive coul d exceed 1 1000 f eet f rom McKnight. Road 2-22-88: 'Council approved the Maplewood H.ighland preliminary plate A condition of approval Was that Lakewood Drive had to be constructed through to this propertys This street connection was required because the site was over 19000 feet from a through - street. 2,o Construction of' utilities on a steep slope: 6-8-87: Council waived the eight percent maximum rule for the Gonyea's Oak Heights preliminary plat and permitted * utilities and a maintenance easement to cross a 20+ percent slope on the basis that "due to extreme topography there is no other practical place to route the required utilities". 3, Lira inage improvement for this area: B-24-87: Council approved the Mark+art Addition preliminary plat. A condition of approval was that only the easterly portion of the site Could be Platted until construction contracts are signed to build the ponds and storm sewers needed to outlet this site to Round Lakes 5-23-88: Council held a public hearing for the Edgerton -Rosel awn drainage improvement. This project is needed to provide the down -stream drainage +acilities-+or the second phase of the Marti +ort Addition and the applicant's plat. Council tabled their consideration and directed the city engineer to study alternative ways to finance the projects Environmental A steep ridge (about 20 percent of grade) runs diagonally across the easterly one-fourth of this sites A depression is located in the southeast corner. This depression is planned to be used as a storm water detention ponds The southwest and northwest portions of the site are wooded . Oak and snap e trees appear to be the dominant species@ There are numerous free-standing trees near the ridge . This slope does no . t qual if y to be a protected sl ope Environmental Reg u 1 ations Section 9-191 (3) states: 10 1 erosion control t ro 1 , storm water runoff , • ut 1 i t y an as Al s i to i l ar structures shall be designed to be maintained and t requiring the operated withou crossing or operation of qnt such as v maintenance vehicles and equ i pme , heavy slopes i n . excess of bul 1 doers, trucks and bac}shoes , on b the eight (e) percent. This requirement may be waived y city ty council where • re there is no other alternatives" (The applicant is requesting this waiver.) Penin is Land use plan designation: R-19 residential low density i' Zoning: F, farm residence 3. Planned density: 14 people/net acre 40 Proposed dens y it io .9 people/net acre (6.4 net acres) 5a policy from the plan: Page 1 G-nate 4 : All properties i es shat 1 have safe and adequate access. Pub 1 i c Wori-: s The drainage plan (page ( a e 15) cal i s for a storm water pond in 1 , the southeast corner of this site. This oand is to be part of a i s t o outlet t o Round Lai-: e. ( Refer to t h e drainage system that � Past Action Section, other sites, Item C ,i3Sg for more • _- _ i n f or,mat i on . ) 2. Sewer and water are available to site . j 1 /Torgers .mem Attachments it, Location Map Plan . Parte s i de Neighborhood Land Use F 3. Property Line/Zoning Map 4a Drainage Map . Preliminary P1 at/Grading Plan 6s Resolution (F ez on i ng ) 11 *. O L/TTLE CANADA 2400 N. SA !N T n6l LOCATION MAP 12 Attachment 1 ,%� • so--ftift.— interchange LS C Parkside. NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN 0 13 Attachment 2 s r- 7S TS TS ' 7 T I 75 1S 1S TS � — r 4.M 1 �� r �� �� � saw r -%A1% - 300' 33 53 66. so 176 .606C Q v1 o�(5) ��o !a/ac�,. I rf jr M , . , • -4 ,SCe '5Co 3 0 ac 140 - 2300 ` Rr 36.24 CI�� 51dc. s6 14C P. IC&D -- -- -- 3,Z7) my-amw 16 S•s �ti V r u.! S 7 8���_t 2 s 4 S .g 7 4 .r .80 00•! �o of a (47) 5TManAVE. + BELl.W000 ---- - 4 X8.69 y P• ., ►� • • �s�* 512 •, 22 526 106 ��� 18 59. a o :r.4L 14 `41) R (4z� M a 3 - o• ♦ • 4 Q o � � ) N (S6� a h 502 - ��•�. 18 56 �: ' m - .so ,7C "t C, a 1854 06 46 1A _ Vacated Street Easement 536 y�, 1848 _. •ZSR � a'�� 1838 3a ° •z4 ProposedSplit 1 it ine p 1830 9 1 0 Ui .378C Q . 7 ;r a 1 822 Alms,. 3 1798 �'eleYv4 @I svwRcs � �. I 1790` , 4) GIG Counr ,p (Z-sz i . 1789• k2o* /A 4 J _ _..x.653_4 - _ ' "- 1zo.T 1 j, . r •e GLr,,1w� r o • p 6� o .z � o.� 0 66 IZo• 4 1 2 Z Irk,`, 0 17816 4 500 9 178 ,��2� y 20� 3 —_1 24 rr -- 'o 7 d3t0 �� /�, LIT b = 4 _ t-- (S) I - - -- — -- — .� -- • [61-t 1401• - 4D 2z 7 .•le :,�il�i� '�j►7::. PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 14 1 Attachment 3 J i Applicant's Site rAjOR WATERSHU OIViK INTERIOR «ATERSMEO OIYIKS PROIOSEO STORM SEWER IxISTING STORM SEWER OPEN CtIAMN[L STORM WATER STORAGE AREA INUNOATION AREA STORAGE AREA vOLUME • �r OISC14AOIGC IN CrS CITY LIMITS MAPLE -WOOD DRAINAGE PLAN 15 Attachment 4 1 / irembi TVVlsW--r-vAM%lAr�, I .--.o • i � i i 1 �• J dp No 40 V�wa 1 40 dp 4v JR dop lo 40 4W 410. awl, Alp I • + ,40/ • ��1 t go 0I gob '40- 40 • •! / • I /err 1 : • • tom► i • • 140go 41111111, .0 /' /�� r %i• �j do ,� i; t /• i *Zoo 0 • I I, I I/ 7► • jj ....... /go / 11 do 64 Jv low %71 • '� ; f��I •;I�if' , ; t • 0 . '; I /,/.� r•/ t ress Orr*" •I te.fit 0 j / • , If do /I•/ , /•/ + / ✓ / #Joo go vgp So p Ao 1 40 so do / • •of rogo go VARi •' • ' s S • • • si I 1 , /' • i • ' //� / • / / • • • / . ; , •• ', / . t. - . /0 � ; / 0 I 1 df 0 dr Af 00 • ti .,,�, go , • r . • / / • .111e./ _ _ i -�--- ' 1:� —=r. "� r.sgo �T�:" i��ri' ' iii ,�%'�+— ��. , .• •'' I'v' 4110 8 A , , �7,p�v; So 1401 •t 1 11 CT. Poo, L. LOCATION MAP PRELIMINARY PLAT AND GRADING -PLAN 16 Attachment 5 Pursuant. to due cal 1 and notice thereof , a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Map 1 ewood , Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of 1988 at 7 p . m . The following members were present: The fol 1 ow i ng members were absent WHEREAS Donald Torgerson and the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F9 farm residence, to R-1. single dwelling, for the fol lw i ng -descr i bed property, all located in the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 179 Township 299 Range 22: 17-29-'A'22-31-0015 015 Sub to Desoto St the S 85 ft of N 115 ft of W 163 ft 17-29-22-31-0016 Sub to Desoto St the S 85 ft of N.200 0 ft of W 163 +t 17-'29-22-31-0017 SUb to Desoto St the S 85 f t of - N X85 ft of W 163 f t 17-29-22-31-0018 Sub to Desoto St the S 85 +t of N 370 +t of W 163 +t 17-219-22-31-0019 Sub to st the S 125 +t of N 495 ft of W 163 ft 1-7-29-22-31-0020 Sub to st s and esmt s and ex N 495 +t the W 163 +t 17-29-22-31-0021 With esmt to Desoto St t h e E 163 +t of W 489 +t of S 85 ft of N 455 ft 17-29-22-31-0058 Sub j to sts and esmts and eef. W 163 f t l ging S of N 30 ft and ex E 163 ft of W 489 ft of S 85 ft of N 455 ft; the SW 1/4 This property is also known as 1790, 18229 18309 1838, 1848 , 1854 . Desoto Street and the large undeveloped -parcel abutting to the east . WHEREAS the procedural history of this rem on ing is as follows: in This rezoning was initiated pursuant to Chapter, 369 Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 17 Attachment 6 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on September 199 1988. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning. be 3s The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 1988 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was pub 1 i shed and ma i 1 ed pursuant to 1 aw . Al 1 persons present at sa i d hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council a1so considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commissions NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning codes The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area incl uded in the proposed change or p l an is adequatel y safeguarded . 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community , ..where app 1 i c ab 1 e and the pub 1 i c we 1 fare . 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the I oq ical eff is ient , and economical extension of publ is services and t ac i 1 i t i es , such as pub 1 i c water, sewers, pol ice and fire protection and schools. Rezoning would eliminate any potential nuisance prob l ems associated with the F., farm residence district, such as raising of livestock within a single -dwelling neighborhood m Adopted this day of , 1988 . Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS- CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the Cit of Maplewood ewood Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefuly compared ared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of 1988 with the original. on f it a in my off ice, and the same is a f ul 1 !true and 1 ete transcript theref rom insofar as , com P the same relates to this rezon ing . 18 Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this clay o+- , 19889 City Clerk City of Maplewood 19 Maplewood Planning Commission -4- Minutes 10-3-88 Commissioner Bar t sec onde Ayes--Axdah I.,, Ayers Barrett, Fiola,# Fischer., son Sletten Nays --Cardinal. D a Preliminary Plat: Torgerson Addition The staf f report was presented to the commission . % Don and Lorraine Torgerson , the appl icants 1822 Desoto Street were present at the meeting, Chairman Axdahl opened the public hearing. Che person in the audience spoke in opposition to the proposed Tc,.---4erson addition. Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish discussed the City's ponding system in the area. Commissioner Fischer moved the planning commission recommend the city council: is Authorize the construction of storm sewer along the 14 to 20 -percent slope, located east of proposed Burr Street and the proposed cul -de -sac, on the basis that due to the extreme topography, there is no other practical place to route the' required storm sewer., 2a Deny the requested variations from the platting code to create a temporary, half -width street and a temporary cul -de- sac in excess of 1,000 feet of length, on the basis that: a. Approval would adversely effect the spirit of the subdivision code and the comprehensive plan, because public safety's ability to provide timely emergency vehicle service could be hampered or jeopardized. be A -Full-width, through street. is a reasonable alternative. This alternative was planned for by the City when approval *was granted for the Twin Oaks Addition to the north and the Mark fort Addition to the west. Ce Approval. is not essential to the reasonable development of this subdivision, d. Council has require ' d f ul 1 -width . through streets to be guaranteed across adjoining properties as a condition • of approval for other similar proposals. Maplewood Planning Commission -5- Minutes 10-3-88 3s Approve the Torgerson Addition preliminary plat, subject to satisfaction of the following conditions before application. f or f i nal p l at approval : a . The City signing a contract (s) to construct the downstream drainage improvements to outl et this and adjoining property to Round Lake. The City Engineer may approve a phased development plan. provided the applicant. can demonstrate that on-site ponding capacity wi l 1 be adequate to maintain predevel opment storm water f 1 ows f rom this site. Any lot or street area not included in the initial phase shail be platted as an out l of until adequate storm water capacity is prow i ded . The entire right-of-way for Burr Street and Ripley Avenue shall be platted an d constructed with the first phases be City or applicant acquisition of the 35 by 163± foot parcel needed to construct Ripley Avenue as a full -width street, through to Desoto Street. If a City project, the applicant shall pay the cost of the feasibility study and all other City expenses to acquire this right-of-way, including attorney's fees. Cs Substitute a drainage easement for Out 1 of B. The property lines for the adjoining lots shall be extended through the easement to the south or east boundaries of the site. The easement shall include all area that would be Ftp to one foot above the approved 100 -year storm design el evat i on f or th i s pond . Th i s easement shat l al so l i ne Ftp with the existing drainage easement on the properties to the east. do Out l of A shall be combined with an adjacent property A deed shall be in the possession of the adjoining property owner before the plat i s signed by the City. The deed to transfer ownerhs i p of this out l of shall stipulate that this property is to be combined with adjoining property to form one parcel , to be described by one property tax description numbers e. The following street names shall be shown: ( 1) The north half of the existing Ripley Avenue right -of -way shat 1 be shown between the west 1 i ne of Bradley Avenue and the east boundary of the site. ( 2 ) "Ripley Avenue" shall be shown west of the south extension of the west line of proposed Lot One, Block One . Maplewood Planning Commission -b- Minutes 1D-3-88 (3) The remainder, of the through. street shat I be named "Burr Street". (4) The cul-de-sac shall be named "Summer Court". f a Reduce the width of Lots One, Two. Five and Six, Block Two, to the minimum permitted to maximize the rear yard area for Lots Three and Four* go City Engineer approval of final grading, drainage, ut i I i t and eros i on control p I an s. These p I an shal I includeq but not be limited to: (1) Identification of the trees to be saved. These trees shall also be identified on the site. (2) Revision of the grading plan and/or install storm sewer along the north boundary of the site to insure that drainage +rom this site does not flow into the properties to the north. (3) Where possible to obtain grading easements on adjoining pr'opertyt make a more gentle transition along the site boundary to the lots adjoining to the north and northeasto (4) Provide survey evidence that Ripley Avenue will line up with existing Ripley Avenueg west of Desoto Street. he Submission of signed developer's agreement and surety for all required public improvements9 including but not limited to: -a full-w.idth street through to Desoto Street and on-site utility and drainage improvements; any required tree planting; erosion control measures; relocation of the NSP utility pole that will be within the new Ripley Avenue 'right -of -way , and,, relocation of the driveway for 1822 Desoto Street to Ripley Avenue* 4o Approve the resolution to approve the rezoning of this site and the. singl e-dwel I ing- I ots to the west from F., farm residence, to R-1. single -dwelling residence. Approval is on the basis that the potential for nuisance related farm uses, such as the raising of livestock in a single -dwelling neighborhoodg would be eliminateds Commissioner Cardinal seconded Ayes--Axdahl Ayers,, Barrett, Cardinal 9 Fiol a, Fischer, Larson.; Sletten / / Aotiou by Council,: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: ,]ATE: INTRODUCTION - Endorsed_______ _______ MEMORANDUM Modlf ied Rejeote._______ Date City Manager Director of Community Development Code Amendment - Residential Garage Size September 21, 1988 Staff is proposing a code amendment to allow residential garages over 1,000 square feet, but not to exceed 1,250 square feet, by conditional use permit on lots under one acre. BACKGROUND Staff is recommending denial o+.a variance to construct a 1,232 -square -foot, detached garage on a 21,730 -square -foot lot at 834 N. McKnight Road, since it does not meet the State -required findings for a variance. Staff feels, however, that the garage should be approved. It would be inconspicuously located on the rear of a deep lot and would have no adverse impact on adjacent properties. The City has made two relatively recent amendments to this ordinance. On August 11, 1986, the City increased the maximum garage size to 1,000 square feet. Prior to that, a garage could not exceed 757. of the floor area of a dwelling or 1,000 square feet, whichever was less. On February 22, 1988, the City increased the maximum size to 1,250 square feet for lots of one acre or larger. The survey on page 3 shows that Maplewood/s current requirements are more liberal than most suburbs, which limit a lot to one garage with a maximum size of 1,000 square feet. DISCUSSION The proposed ordinance would allow the City to approve larger garages on -' lots- under one acre where the garage would not have an adverse effect on surrounding properties. This may occur where lots are unusually deep or abut non-residential land. The -conditional use permit would allow the Council to hold a public hearing and review each situation on a case-by-case basis. RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached ordinance,, kd Attachments 1. Ordinance ORDINANCE NOW AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGULATING 'RESIDENTIAL GARAGES i THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 36-77 is added as fol l ows (additions are underlined): Sec. 36-77. Private garages. (a) Private garages are l invited to one attached and one detached garage for each 1 of . (b) Each private garage shal 1 not exceed 1 ,000 square feet of floor oor area on a lot under one acre and 1,250 square feet on a l of of one acre or more. The C i t however ma a rave a--garage,,-not to exceed i s uare feet on lots under one acre by conditional use ermit rovided that there are no other garages on the site no other garages shal l be al l owed in the f uturse and no commercial use of the garage shall occur, unless authorized by the Cit -Council . However, in no event shall the garage exceed the souare foot area of the house. (c) A private garage shal 1 not exceed one story in height as viewed from the street. However, i n no event shat l the he i ht exceed 95% of the height of the In r%a a an e .(d) Detached garages shal l not i nc.l ude l i v i ng space. Section 2.. This ordinance shal l take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Council on , 1988 Attest: City Cl erk Mayor Ayes -- Nays_. GARAGE SURVEY (8-18-88) The results of a -survey of 27 cities are as follows: Ie 22 cities (82%) require a maximum garage area: -1P0OO square feet was the median - (12., 44%) -Ranges. 600 square feet tolP500 square feet -Five cities used a percentage of lot coverages 2. 22 cities (82%) include storage area in calculating the maximum allowed garage area. 32 Maximum number of garages: -One = 12 (44%) -One attached and one detached = 4 C 15%) -One attached and two detached = 1 (4-%) -Two (any combination) = 2 (7.%) -No limit = 8 (30%) It appears that Maplewood's garage requirements are similar to the average requirements in other cities. Attachment 2 City Use Part it ioned Maximum Storage Area in Maximum Area Number Calculation of Area Coon Rapids 768 sq. ft. or 75% No limit No of dwelling floor except sq. fte area cannot exceed 1,P200 sq. ft. Brooklyn Center 1,000 sq, ft. ,r but 2 Yes. cannot exceed.floor area of dwelling. Fridley 1#000 sq. ft.,Pnot to 1, a 2nd No exceed 100% of lst bldg. allowed floor area. with special use permit Blaine 10% of lot area not 1 attached and Yes to exceed 1, 000 sq, ft. 1 detached New Brighton No limit on attached 1 attached and Yes 600 sq. ft. for 1 detached New Hope 900 sq. ft* 1 Yes White Bear Lake 1,000 sq. ft. attached 1 Yes 750 sq. ft. detached Apple Valley No limit attached 1 detached (acces- Yes 750 sq. ft. detached sory bldg.) 1 attached So. St. Paul Allow no more than lo, but may get Yes 30% of lot area to special exception be covered for 2nd Burnsville 1#000 sq. ft. No limit except Yes square feet Maple Grove 1.,000 sq. ft. 1 Yes Columbia May not exceed sq. f t. 1 Yes Heights of principal dwelling' Cottage Grove No limit attached 1 attached and Yes 1, 000 sq. f t. detached 1 detached West St. Paul Lots C75'--624 sq,. ft,, 1 detached Yes Lots a75'--800 sq. fte No. St. Paul Smaller of 1,r008 sq. ft. 1 Yes or 10% of lot area Oakda 1 e .1,P000 sq. fte Little Canada 900 sq. ft. Woodbury 1o,000 sq.. ft., Newport 864 sq. ft. 1,008 sq. ft. garage and storage Vadnais Heights 900 sq. ft. St. Paul 1,000 sq. ft. Roseville 1,000 sq. ft. Plymouth 1,000 sq. ft. No limit up to Yes 1,V000 sq. ft. total 1 No 1 No 2 up to 1 imit, Yes sq. ft. 1 No No., up' to sq. ft. Yes 1 Yes No limitf up to Yes 1#000 sq. - ft. Crystal Not more than 30% of No limit Yes backyard may be (try to limit to covered 1,000 sq. ft.) Golden Valley 1,000 sq. ft. No limit up to Yes 1,000 sq. ft. Eagan No limit, no more No limit Yes 20% of lot *covered Shoreview 1,000 sq. ft. per bldg. 1 attached Yes 1,r500 sq. ft. total 2 detached, 2nd detached no larger than 250 sq. ft. Maplewood Planning Commission Minutes 10-3-88 Es Code Amendment: Residential Garage Size Associate Planner Randall Johnson presented the staff reports. The commissioners discussed the conditions of a conditional use permit. A commissioner voiced concern that two I .250 -square - foot garages would be built on one 109000 -square -foot lots Commissioner Cardinal moved the planning commission recommend approval of, the code amendment to allow residential garages over 19000 square feets, but not to exceed 19250 square feet9 on lots under one acre by conditional use permits provided that there are no other garages on the site and no other garages shah I be al I owed in the future. Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes --Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal s Fiol a, Fischer, Larson,, Sletten Abstentions--Axdahl IX8 UNP INISHED . SUS INESS A w Variance or Conditional -Use Permit: 834 N. McKnight Rd. (Hayes) The staf report was presented an discusseds re or n ed an Comm its ioneSl etten moved the lanning commission recommend.: I I Denial 0 the variance, v on the basis that the garage does variance: ia cl not meet the 'ndings for variance: An Stric enforce ent would not cause undue hardship because of c i t\!rcums;Pances unique to the property: in A Is -square -foot garage can be built on -the site. 1Z 2w Thireq st is not due to circumstances unique to th i proper y. A precedent would be set that would nddermine /P r\ the ordinance. E. The ariance woul ' not be in keeping with the spirit and int:et of the ordin Oce. Approv I of the resolution\aapproving a conditional use permit for an indef inite time pe iod for a I 232 -square -foot garage on the rear of e34 N. McKn'ght Road. The following -findings are included with those required by code: 13 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Variance or Conditional.Use Permit LOCATION: 834 N. McKnight Road APPLICANT/OWNER: Marty Hayes DATE: September 27, 198E INTRODUCTION .Action by Council: Endorsed.... Modifl ed ReJ ecte Dat The appi ican I t is requesting a variance to construct a detached, 1,232-square-+Oot garage on a 21,730-square-+oot lots Section 36-77 o -f City Code I imits the, maximum size of a garage on a I of under one acre to 1 000 square feet . A variance of 250 square feet is needed - Staff is recommending that this request be approved as a conditional use permit,. rather than a variance& REQUIRED FINDINGS Section 367-10, subdivision 6(2) of State law requires that the following findings be made before a variance to the zoning ordinance can be granted: a. Strict enforcement WOUI d cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. 9 with the spirit and intent of b. The variance WOUld be in keep in the ordinance& "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance t be put to a reasonable use i+ used means the property in question canno under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the to his property, not created by .andowner is due to circumstances unique 11 not al the essential tne landownerg and the varianceg if, grantedg wi r character of the local itY0 Economic considerations' alone. shall not constitute an undue hardship i+ reasonable use for the property e,,-#.ists under the terms of the ordinance. 2w City Code requires that the first ten findings in the resolution on page 8 must be met to approve a co�djtional use permits DISCUSSION S . taff is recommending against the variance on the basis -_ that it does not -meet the State -required findings. Staff feels, however,9 that the garage would not have an adverse effect on surrounding properties. The neighbors responding to staff's survey agreed. Staff isq therefore, recommending a code amendment in a separate report that would allow garages over 19000 -square -feet an smaller 1ots by conditional use permits The garage wau 1 d meet the f i ndi ngs requ i red f or a condi t i oral use per•mi t . RECOMMENDATION Denial 1 of the e gar i an c e� on the basis that the garage does not meet I. the findings for a variance: A. Strict e f ar c emen t would not cause undue hardship. because of circumstances unique to the property:. , 1. A 1 000 -square -foot garage can be bu i l t on the s i t e. 4 2. The request is not due to circumstances unique to this property. A precedent wou1d be set that would undermine t h e ordinances variance would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent E . The gar i a . of the ordinances approving a conditional use permit IIs Approve the resolution an page , rt I n def i n for d • i t e time period for a 1,232 -square -foot garage cin t h� e r ee•r of $34 N. McKnight t Road. The following findings ar•e included ikti t h those required by Code: . Aproperty The to the east is Planned as a storm -water hol di no . pond. Be The Don John property to the southeast has a commercial -sized garages G •. The g -r age would be constructed on the rear of a �. deep er - t han -n orma l 1 a t . D . The app l i cart t doe=_ not have another garage. 2 CITIZEN COMMENTS Of the 12ro erty owners within 350 feet of the site, six P P reP 1 ied. All were in favor. Comments were as follows: 1. The owner has equipment that is better for neighborhood aesthetics' ics' if it were stored in the garages rather than out in theY ard. If the garage is of adequate sizes the owner shouldn't need a shed in the future. 2. I like big garages. 3. It causes no problems and he needs the space. 4. In the future. I would like to add to my garage. REFERENCE Svrround i na Land Uses Norths west and south: Single dwellings East: Undeveloped land planned .for a drainage pond and high- density igh-density residentia1 use. Building Code An area separation wall is required for a garage over 1,000 square feet ii Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Appl icant' s letter 5. Resolution 3 LOCATION MAP 4 Tonners Lake �` 12 94 Attachment 1 i •• w M 001 do -.z POD "I'lljlllllllll 1111111 111 Ofill do a •� t � its •� s.• � asst •F58ar (3-7.5 sc,} 4►=o� ....� �. • (4s Uw-) A �...i. 21ckto - , J _ • • • BEAVER LAK & LU?M. CM.Zi ,� ' •� ' Qi4• q- ts*47 iD N • �.QUO . • , : .� .: • 89 . '- �' 100. � -: - � . • ' � + . ' # �• .- • ' .• , .► • • i ,. sole � � am .M 31 J 840 .sok. ,. •:' ' : �.• 044. ' 834 ftwomma . �ti�• •. • r ' • ` • w • (2.) 2.36 &c. • - ''' 830 _ '. . 46 0 181 2 s 3 s . _.:_ .3.�. Z �� - ♦ 1.00 w. 4,q • . '• (490. 4 y _ . t7 (44 W t. ' y ... ' 334x1• -'' - .. ' ,-- •. dip ID ,•� •� • , • • • al t ,4 . r A 144.8 0 F. sea 17 dm • . f ..! . �` 4 PROPERTY, LINE /ZONING MAP 5 Attachment 2 V � Y Y 73q �+,/, At A P, 1� Mpplewodd TAA/ UjLrU- way 1,54 i At O DwEiIiA)t I � 7y Ln rd 'OF? 3 OMAN- -L4 ,DL; j ELV!.y Dwelt; �o .F-30 -� l SITE PLAN 6 Attachment 3 a Ap-'Oo' i r 7 Attachment 4 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the 10th day of October, 1988 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The fol i owing members were absent : WHEREAS Marty Hayes initiated a conditional use permit to construct a 1,232 -square -foot garage at the fol 1 ow i ng-descr i bed property: The souther l y 82 f eet of the wester 1 y 265 feet of Lot 4, auditor's subdivision No. 77 This property i s also known as 834 N. McKnight Road, Maplewood; WHEREAS, SEAS the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: in This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on October 31 1988. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be • 2a The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on October 109 1988. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to laws Al l P present resent at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and P resent written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commissions NOW9 THEREFORE,, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL THAT the above-described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings -of -f act: 10 The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3`� The use wool d be 1 ocated designed , maintained and operated to . � be compatible with the character of that zoning district . 4s The use would not depreciate property values. F . The use would not be hai ardour , detrimental or disturbing to P potential resent and surrounding land uses, due to the noises, g 1 are , smoke,, dustj odor, fumes, water pol 1 ut i on , water run -o++, vibration, general unsi htl iness� electrical interference or other nuisances . 9 8 Attachment 5 6. The use would d generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe accessor • that will cause undue burden to the area properties. parking needs t 7. The use would d be serviced by essential public services, such as streets , p o 1 ice f ire protect ion , ut i 1 it i es , school s and parks . , $ The use would not create excessive additional requirements at . public cost r for faci1ities and services; and would not be public detrimental to the welfare of the city. 9. The use would preserve and i-ncorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development. designs 1 0. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. The property rt to the east is planned as a storm -water holding 11. pond . 128 The Don 3o property hnto the southeast has a commercial -sized garage. 13 . The garage e woul d be constructed on the rear of a deeper -than- normal lots Adopted this 10th day of October, 19880 Seconded by Ayes ---- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSE Y ) ss • CITY OF MAPLEWOOD � being n the duly qualified and appointed clerk of I , the enders i gned , 9 the P he Cit of Ma l ewood , Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have he attached and foregoing ex carefully compared t tract of minutes of a regular meeting of the. City of Maplewood, held on the 10th day of with the original on file in my off ice, and the same is October, 1988 , a f ul i , true and complete transcript insofar as the same rel ates to a conditional use permits d the corporate Witness my hand as such clerk erk an orate seal of the city P this day of , 19888 City C1 erk City of Maplewood Maplewood Planning Commission -7- Minutes 10-3-88 E Code Amendment: Residential Garage Size Associate Planne Randall Johns presented the staff report. Randra. Johnso ioner iscL t of a conditional use The commissioners iscussed t conditions r r permit. A comm issi er voi d concern that two 1,250-square- Ls foot garages would b bu* on one 10,9000 -square -foot lots Commissioner Cardina mo d the planning commission recommend C rdina 1 approval of the co amen nt to allow residential garages n d t nh te planning to a over 19000 squar feet9 but t to exceed 19250 square feetq on L lots under one cre by cond\itinal use permitg provided that there are no dther garages on t site and no other garages shall be allowed in the futures Commissioner Sletten seconded 'A --Ayers. Barrett ., Car i a'Ve l Fiol a Fischer Larsong Sletten Abstentions--Ar,dahl IX. UNFINISHED BUSINESS As Variance or Conditional -Use Permit: 834 N. McKnight Rd. (Hayes) The staff report was presented and discusseds Commissioner Sletten moved the planning commission recommend: in Denial of the variance, on the basis that the garage does not meet the findings for a variance: As Strict enforcement would not cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property: in A 1,,000 -square -foot garage can be built on the site. 2a The request is not due to circumstances unique to this property. A precedent would be set that would undermine the ordinance. Be The variance would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinances Approval of the resolution approving a c ondition'al use permit for an indefinite time period for a 1,232 -square -foot garage on the rearof834 N. McKnight Road. The following findings are included with those required by code: Maplewood Planning Commission Minutes 10-3-B8 A . The property to the east is pl anned as a storm -water holding ponds Be The ikon ,John property to the southeast has a commercial garages C . The garage woul d be constructed on the rear of a deeper -than -normal lots D . The applicant does not have an attached or detached garage at present. Commissioner Cardinal seconded Ayes --Ax d ah 1 , Ayers, Barrett , Card J. nal , F i o 1 a , Fischer, Larson,, S1 ett en X . COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS As Council Meeting: -September 26, 1988 Ba Representative for the October 10, 1988 Council Meeting: . Dennis Larson XI. STAFF PRESENTATIONS XII. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m. MEMORANDUM Action by Counc- F.P-dor,se Modif�e TO: City Manager FROM: Environmental Health Official RE: Revised On -Site Sewage Treatment System Ordinance DATE: September 30, 1988 The proposed ordinance for on-site sewage treatment systems eliminates outdated requirements in sections 28-76 through 28-78. Section 28-76. The City currently uses the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Individual Sewage Treatment Systems Standards (6 MCAR - 4.8040). This section also requires enough land for both the proposed system and a back-up system, in case the first system fails. Section 28-77 (a) prohibits the discharge of sewage on the ground or water surface from failing systems, and prohibits the spreading of sewage on the ground from tanks that have been pumped. Such sewage should be taken to Pigs Eye or to other rural areas where such disposal is legal . Section 28-77 (b). Sewage from holding tanks, such as in recreational vehicles, should be disposed of at gas stations or R.V. parks where such facilities are available, not in manholes in the street. Approve the attached ordinance. jl Ordinance ORDINANCE NON . AN ORDINANCE amending the requirements for Individual Sewage Treatment Systems A The Maplewood City Council hereby ordains as follows Section 1. Sections 28--76 through 28-78 are amended to read as follows ( add i t ions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): ARTICLE V . INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS Sec. 28-76. On-site se wa a treatment systems . Requimed-where-no p��-tc-sea�er--�t�ax�al��e In areas of the Cit where mun i c i a l sewers are not avail able al 1 n --site sews a treatment systems shat 1 be designed., instal led, and o erated in accordance with the Minnesota Pollution Control A enc - s Individual Sewn e Treat men t Systems Standards ( 6 MCAR 4.8040 as revised on August 28 1978) . In areas where municipal sewer is not available -,--all new subdivided lots shall have adequate usabl e -space for an on --site sewage -treatment system and additional space to add a second dra i of i el d area .- -�°�t f f-water�cf sets--�sr--cther-p�-�tmb�ng-f��tttres�-e:�fst--err enq-�btt�fc��ne�-�-oca�ec�-�n�the�cttq-wt�erc-there-�s-nc�-p�tbf�c sea�er-w th n--a-ressomabfe-d+stamee ; --suit abfe--proV+stam -she+4- be-�nad�f or--cftspastng-of�°the�sew�tge-art�tnat�ng--*n--sttc�t l��t��-d�n���q-arq�-�ne��t�d-cif-c��spcs�tf�a�h�cb�mee�s-t#�e ret�t��r-e�tents�°and��tartti�tr�is--recc��nmenc�ee�--ar--ep��tbf �si�ed-bp-tie state,_,w.c�mm�ss�ener�-t�f-heafth : �---Sewage-fro�n�b�t�ft��ngs ; -�oth�r than--r�stdences ;--shaff�t�e-�c��spt�sed�-flf�-�ts�rec���rect--or recotn�teficied�-�Sy-regufat+ons-- recommemdet+oms-emd -Pdb ++shed tnstr�tct�:ons-of-�tbe�s�s�e�-cQmrtt�sstQner-of--bc�t�-tb :--f�f~ s.ept�c-t�tn�s��tnd-�: �nt�of f--��tnlis-s�t�tf�-�t�e�-c�pers�ed-gin �tccerdartce-wtth�-re�twttf�tt�cns-�tn��reco�n�nenc��tt�orts-of�-the�sts�e ct�+nrn�rss�oner�e�f°�hea�-th f b� �n-areas�of �-the�c�tp_where-,m�tn�cpaf--sca�ers--�trc�-n�s� �tbat�-�t�sfe--and-where ; �-�n-thy--ap�r��n--t�f-the�c�rty-cc��nctf ;--�� +S -not -pre et-ice&+-pr*Yate--wster-carryT* ml --sewage d*spose+--syste j,­at_pr�Vq-*s-mecessarrq--+ar--d*sPos tf-0f -human wastes-, - Amy -s ch ­p*r+vy-Msha++--be-camstructed-im-secardamr-e w��h�re��t�-attr�rts ;-pfans�ant�-recom�nertc�at�©ns�-p�tbf�shed--bq--the state--ct�rnr��sstc�ner�©f�-heafth--and--shaff�-be�rn�t�rtta�r�et�--�rt �tcc�srr��tnce-�t�tht-stwtch�-ptwtk�ftshc�f-rcc�afi�nenda�tc�ns -Sep +C-tftMk --+Mh Sec. 28-77. D_i_5ppsal of E-Ff 1 uent. It shal 1 be Unl aWf U1 to dispose o+ the ef f 1 Uent from any.. one -site -sewj!Rg system or hold anywhere on -It -he rOUnd SUr+ace or in any body -of water=., (b) It shall be unlaW+U1 to „d i s,p-o seo+ the e+-flUent from z-,, hol dinvehicl_fL.3__..irI any. tanl.::_,_. tch as in a recreational �tjjggproved lo-c-gations in the city can it�Lry_ sewer system. *e* No-O"Metm--+eSinee-9 •i-ns--•r• +Oy- -cause - or- pefftm+t-en -Sep r vie+ +-Otm-ee "_*nDoO+ -wh f "Sed -+or -d +sPoSe+-C+ -sewage- tn-t fh e -e-'t cf"et a - ntm-other-di Seel r-eeftb +e- W "W(st e Set!, -Re-78-, --who- V+ i sob eys-I -omits-, t -or -who. ait 't Section 2.2. This ortlif-iance shall ti,:.kle ER++eCt upon its passage7cI publicaticon X Passed by the Maplewood City Council this day o+ , 1988. City Clerk I TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: INTRODUCTION MEMORANDUM City Manager Randy Johnson, Associate Planner Tax -Exempt Financing Requirements October 41 1988 SUMMARY Act -ion b�y 1,qodi f Rej The Housing and Redevelopment Authority and staff are proposing several revisions to the criteria for approval of tax-exempt financing . These revisions include mandatory design elements and expansion of the list of design upgrade options to address the unique needs of older adults. BACKGROUND ill On December 26, 1987, Council approved tax-exempt financing for the Cottages of Maplewood (Ariel Street and Wood lynn Avenue) At the suggestion of the HRA, the development was required to comply with only +our of 16 design upgrade options rather than eight of 16, as normally required. Although some of these 16 options do apply to senior housingg it was recognized that these criteria were not adopted with the needs of senior citizens in mind. 2n On January 11, Council asked the HRA to propose amendments to these criteria to address the unique needs of older adults. On June 13, council accepted the HRA's recommendations (page 9) except for the following items which it referred back to the HRA for further consideration: a a Council wanted to reduce the distance to a bus stop to one block for older adult housing and to 1/4 mile for family housing, if NEST would not be available. The HRA had proposed two blocks and 1/2 mile, respectively ba Council indicated a preference- to require 50 percent of the revised list of design upgrades, which includes 21 items,, rather than eight optional items as had been proposed by the HRA. ca Council also wanted the HRA to consider: (1) The mandatory provision of storm shelters, i+ basements were not to be provided. Storm shelters would otherwise be an optional design upgrades (2) The mandatory prDVISIOn of a building security system (s)a C 3) The developer to retain possession for at least five years. (4) Requiring more than 20 percent of a development's units to be set aside for low -to -moderate income householdso COMMENTS Council's suggested distance to a bus stop and the inclusion of storm shelters and a building security system(s) are appropriate amendmentse The remainder of Council's suggestions are discussed bel own Number of Optional Design Upgrades: Developers should continue to be required to include no more than eight optional design upgrades regardless of the number of options available. This recommendation is based upon a survey (page 11) of six apartments built or approved between 1979 and 1988=-f our of which have been approved for tax-exempt financing. The results of this survey show that only one of the six complexes (Silver Ridge) includes at least eight of the Currently required design upgrade options. The remainder of the developments covered have to add between one to three design Upgrades to qualify for tax-exempt financing under the current policy. When compared to the proposed design upgrade opt ions 7 the four previously approved tax-exempt financed developments include eight to ten of the upgrade options. However, the two older complexes7 (Maplewood Garden s--McKn i g h t and Mailand Roads and Maple Knoll --Mesabi and White Bear Avenue) which staff assumes that Council would consider to be substandard for approval of tax-exempt financing, included only five to six of the proposed design upgradess Assuming Council is satisfied with the amenities that are provided by the developments approved since 1985, there appears to be no need to require more than eight design upgrades. Length of Ownership by the Developer: Mary Ippel, the city's bond counselg states that because the city's full faith and credit does not back this financing, the city cannot regulate the sale of these properties. Howeverg the conditions of the agreement between the city and the initial developer are bind ing*on any and all future property owners until the bonds for the tax-exempt financing are retired. If a de+aul t were to occur, the penalty is the elimination of the f ederal tax preference for all of the investors. This is a signi4icant enough penalty that a default is unlikely. Ms. Ippel also mentioned that if the initial developer runs into financial difficulty, a transfer of ownership could be in the city's best interest. Set Aside of Low -to -Moderate Income Units: The Cottages of Maplewood development was the first proposal approved under the current federal tax laws The following set- aside provisions were required.. The first provision is federal law. The second was imposed by the City because tax -increment + inancing was also requested (Cottages of Maplewood) Al I future proposals should abide by these provisions as a minimum.a is Federal low -to -moderate income housing requirement: a a Set aside 20 percent of the units for households that earn 50 percent or I ess of the area median income ($409700 for a househol d of four in 1988) or be set aside 40 percent of the units for households that earn 60 percent or less of the area median incomes The developer was permitted to choose between the options for the Cottages of Maplewood developments 2s Where both tax-exempt and tax -increment financing are to be used: Require compliance with the federal provisions outlined above, plus require at least 75 percent of the units to be set aside for households earning 110 percent or less of the area median income. (Income ceiling for moderate income households.) RECOMMENDAT I ON Revise the City's requirements for approval of tax-exempt financing, relative to multiple dwellings, as follows (new language is underlined, language to be deleted is crossed out): REQUIREMENTS FOR TAX-EXEMPT FINANCING The following additional requirements. shal I apply to multiple -dwelling projects: 1. A written opiniong with supporting justi+icationg from a quali+ied expert acceptable to the City, shall be submitted with the application to document that: a. The development will not adversely increase the. vacancy rates of rental multiple dwellings in the City that are existing or have received preliminary City approval over the metropolitan average& b There is reasonable assurance that the development will be able to comply with the federal low -to -moderate income requirement over the life of the bond issuen 2a The bond indenture agreement shall require: a The developer to periodical I y certify, to the City and trustee camp iance with the federal I ow -to - moderate income requirement. The frequency of cert i+i- cation shat I be determined on a case-by-case basis. ba The trustee is to inform the City of noncompliance trends with federal low -to -moderate income req uire- mentsM c. Stipul --- ate the f edera l I aw reguirements f or the set- aside of low -to -moderate income units and any other set-aside provisions a2reed to by the developer. if tax -increment f inancin2 is also to be used -by the devel opment than at I east 75 -p-ercent of the un its shat I al so be set aside f or households earning not more than 110 percent of the area median incomes 3n The project must exceed minimum code requirements by incorporating the +ollowin.9 mandatory and optional des l-.g,n upgrade features: FAMILY AND SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS An Mandatory ------ Requirement in Each devel_opment that would house ---.12ublic trans por-, tation-dependent residentsshall be (a) located near a scheduled public bus stMor (b) an agreement must be to provide a new -public stop, -and (c) if the NEST. (Northeast Suburban Transit) service is not available an a2reement with a pri-vat e carrier must be secured to 12rovide a convenient schedule of pick ua- and degarture times. The maximum distance to a bus stol2--for senior housing -leve l-oj2meats shall be 400 feet (one block) and one-guarter mile for + ami ly-housin2-developmeats s 2n A storm shelter shall be provided if the structure Cs) or each units if townhouses-,- will not. have basements. The storm shelter shall have a capacity of egualto E30 percent of the P] anned Population of the devel_opment. Each erson shall be allowed at least three sguare feet of are -a--,-, 3z A security --system (s) shall be provided ' . Securit system shall be defined as follows: For units with common hall-wa entrances --a keyed lobb door and deadbolts on each unit doors Four townhouse -style units with individual entrances from outside. each outside entrance door shall have a deadbol t . --12eeIR- hole. solid core door and inside chain -crovided. 0 B o Tonal Reguirements (At least eight of the following items must be included): in Brick 2 Building design should be distinctive, nongeneric style with meaningful details (such as large windows.) skylights, etc u)w 3s A noticeable increase in size and quantity of landscape plantings over what is normally required IN 4s Underground irrigation of all landscapings 5a Usable open space provided above code mini mum ll 6. El ectrical out et adjacent to at I east hal f of the park ing stal 1 s for car heaters 7a A children's play areas a- Beadbo+t-+eeks-, (mandatory item) 9- Secur+ty-system-. (mandatory item) S. Swimming pool tennis court horseshoe -pits-, indoor multi -activity room or outdoor multi - activity buildingY or similar recreational facil it s 2 98 At I east 10% more parking spaces or garages than code requires. 11Underground park .) ing.parking under the 2- ir 0. dwelling unit or attached garagesm 4 M 4L %we a 11. Setbacks above code minimums. 4 12. Floor areas above code minimums. -1 4ft 4 a 4 E oft -%W R 13. All parking stall widths at least ten feet. 61411 14. Recreational walkways or sidewalks. W vow 15s At I east f ive percent of the units wil I be three- bedroom units for famil_y--deve lomen ts and two units for senior develop -meats (not including caretal-Cer Ltnits) . 16. Provide f or an enclosed bus sto shel ter. - if not available. 17, On-siterden 0 r flower central ized -2 plots in a locati.on or near the entrance of units with direct outdoor access 18, Washer and dryer hook-ups --in each unit for townhouse units or a washer and dryer instal led on each floor for apartment units*. 19.A landsca ed sitting --area with tables and benches central to the -coWI ex or a. sodded IIp_r_ivate-app-earin.9-'.'-- yard area near the he entrance to units with direct outdoor Accesso 20. Provision of a storm shelter in addition to basement are -as 21. For developments not using tax -increment + inanc ing-----(TIF) the set-aside of at I east 50 -gercent of the units for households earning 110 percent or less of the area median income (ceiling-­Jor moderate income) M* For develop ents that will receive TIF funds,. the set-aside of more than 75 percent of the units for househol ds, earn -i--ag 110 Rercent of I ess of the area median incomes 4s As a condition of approving this financing, a.lump-sum fee at bond closing or an annual fee over the I i+e of the bond issue will be required. The City reserves the right to choose the fee option that will be most beneficial to the City. This choice will be made when the final resolution is adopted. Factors to be taken into account will include, but not be I imited to: a. The size of requested issue ba Unbudgeted City funding needs at the time of the request co The number of requests do Federal arbitrage considerations The formula for each fee option is as follows: a. Annual fee: Full bond maturity: An annual fee payable on each anniversary of the bond issue of -'not less than one-eighth of one percent of the unpaid balance and one-quarter of one percent of the bond issue shall be paid. at bond closing, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions w �G (2) Prepayment of bonds: The same as the f ul I bond maturity requirement, except if all of the outstanding bonds are prepaid prior to f final bond mater' ityg the developer shall payq at the time of such prepayment to final bond maturity, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions. be Lump -sum fee: At bond closing, a Jump -sum fee shall be paid that is equivalent to the present value of the 'annual fee option. The present value must be determined by a qualified expert g acceptable to the Citys mb Attachments: 1. Present Design Upgrade Options 2. HRA's May 1988 Recommendation 3. Survey PRESENT DESIGN UPGRADE OPTIONS (Eight of Sixteen are, Required) a Brick b Buil ding design should be a distinctive, nongeneric style with meaningful details C A noticeable increase in the size and quantity of landscape plantings over what is normally required d Underground irrigation of all landscaping e. Usable open space provided above code minimums +0 Electrical outlets adjacent to at least half the parking stalls for car heaters 9W A children's play area h,w Dead bolt locks in Security system Swimming pool tennis courts indoor multi -activity room or outdoor multi -activity building k At least 10% more parking spaces or garages than code requires 10 Underground parking or parking under the dwelling unit ma Setbacks above code minimums n. Floor areas above codominimums on All parking stall width at least ten feet pe Recreational walkways or sidewalk Attachment 1 HRA's Recommendation ('5-24-88) LEES IGN..UPGRADE OPTIONS FOR TAX-EXEMPT FINANCING (New I angu age is underlined) FAMILY AND SENIOR HOUSING. DEVELOPMENTS A Mandatory Reguirement 1, Each development that Would house public trans Rortation- bl i dependent residentsc., shal I be (a) I ocated near a schedul ed bus StRE or (b) an agreement must be t-9.provide a new publ ic stoR___.__ and (c) - if the NEST (Northeast Suburban Transit) service is not availablel-an a2- eement With . --a rivate --- carrier must be secured to provide a convenient schedule of.--- i ckeup -_and departure times. The maximum distance to a bus sto for senior housin!g developments. shall be 80 0 feet (two blocks) and one-half mile for family-hour reguirements as Bo Optional Requirements (At least eight of the following items must be included) : 1. Frick: 2. Building design should be a distinctive, nongeneric style with meaningful details (such as large windows, sof ylights9 etc .)a 3 A noticeable increase. in size and quantity of landscape plantings over what is normal-ly required. 4. Underground- irrigation of all landscaping. 5. Usable open space provided above code minimum. 6. Electrical out . lets adjacent to at least half the parking stalls for car heaters o 7. A child ren /s play area. So Deadbolt lockso 9. Security system. 10. Swimming pool tennis court, indoor multi -activity room or outdoor multi -activity buildingo 11. At least 10% more parking spaces or garages than code requires s 12. Underground parking or parking under the dwelling units 13. Setbacks above code minimums. 9 Attachment 2 14. Floor areas above code mini mums m 15a All parking stall widths at least ten feet. 16. Recreational walkways or sidewalk. At least +i• ve 12erccznt o+ the units shall be three-bedroom units 17. ts . and two-bedroom units for senior +or family---developmen developments (not includ.Lng caretaker units). 18. Provi . de for an enclosed bus stor) shelter-.-.i+ not avail abl e. n or flower 19, On-site !jarde _Rlots in a central location or near the entrance of units with direct outdoor acc 20. Washer and drye-r hoak -u s i n eachunitfor townhouse units or a washer and dryer installed on each floor +or---a artment units. 21. A landscaped sittin-2_area with tables and benches central to the co ex or a sodded "grivate- arinSL" Ya d area near the entrance to units with direct outdoor access. 22, Attached aaragejL__ under round arkk ing-or op-en ari- P-!Rc e( s) within 100 feet to a building/unit entrance that requires the, n of iation of few or no ste s a 10 Apartment _. P - Development October 61 1988 SURVEY Optional .Design Upgrades Included in Approved Developments Existing Upgrades Proposed Upgrades ( See page 8 for the (See the recommendation list of options) on page 4 for the l i st of options) Maple Ridge h,i,j,l ,n,o,p = 7 8,10Ill ,12,13,14,19,21 8 (1985 ) Hazel Ridge h,i ,j,l ,no 7 8 110 111 912,13,15,17918, (Senior -1985) 21* - 9 Silver Ridge d,e,g,h,i,j,m,n,o, 4,5,7,8,11,12,13,14, (1985 P 9 18921* = 10 Cottages of bs h,n,o,p 5 2110,12,14,15,18,19, Map ewood (1988) 21 = 8 ( Proposed Senior) Maplewood g,h,i,n,o 5 7113,14915,.21 = 5 Gardens (1979 ) Maple e k'.nol l P g h j n o,p 6 � y � � 7,8,12,13,15,.21 = 6 (1980 ) *Item 21 under the old tax rules 55% of the units had to be set aside for low -to -moderate households. The 1979 and 1980 projects comply because they are Section 8 developments (100% low -to -moderate income)" Section 8 developments are no longer constructed. 11 Atttachment 3 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Fisher called the meeting to order at 7,105 p.m. 28 ROLL CALL Comm i ss ion ers Dale Carlson Present Thomas Connelly Present Lorraine Fischer Present ' Greg Schm i t Absent John Frey Absent 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A . Tax -Exempt Financing Requirements • son moved and Commissioner Connelly Commissioner Carl seconded to recommend approval of the revised • resented in Attachment A. Motion e rquirements p carried --Ayes all. 76 NEW BUSINESS,,, . A. HRA/HRC-Liaison n moved and Commissioner Commissioner Carlson Connelly sera, nded to recommend approval of the recommendations . as presented in the staf f report. Motion Cars, i ed-- Ayes al 1 . Attachment A is the same as the recommendation in October 49 1988 staff reports MEMORANDUM AGENDA ITEM H-5 TO: City Manager . FROM: Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Cope Avenue, Project 85-26: Assessment Appeals DATE: October 21 9 1988 I NTRODUCT I ON Attached are copies of the appeals received for the assessment of the subject project. Review and recommended revisions of the proposed assessments are discussed hereinn BACKGROUND All proposed assessments for properties that have filed appeals were correctly formulated in accordance with Map lewood's assessment procedures, which are primarily based on past precedent. Specifically, the owners of properties located at 2272 Craig Place and 2271 Craig Place questioned the assessment against their property for frontage on Cope., which is the side I of I ine of these corner I ots. The pol icy of assessing the short side of the corner lot with 10 feet and any excess over 150 feet of length on the long side .of the I of was f of I owed. Such I ots wool d not be assessed for the construction of the street in the front of the lot when built. The proposed storm sewer assessment unit for PIN 11- 29-22-31-0029 was verified as that portion of the .lot not previously assessed for the county ditch project (14,820 S.F. was previously assessed out of a lot total of 20,,400 S wF a) . The reference made by the owner of 1922 Castl e Avenue to previous assessment was for the water tower only, which is irrelevant to the proposed assessments. However, the actual question at hand is whether the assessments conform to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. Based on an opinion from an independent appraiser retained by the city, the proposed assessmentsfor six. of the parcels for which appeals were filed with the city council cannot be sustained as to increase in property value. The following table gives the total proposed assessment and the opinion as to sustainable increase in property value for those properties for which appeals were filed. A new assessment roll incorporating reductions of proposed assessments to a 1 eve l that can be sustained as increase to property value is attached. The difference between the original l y proposed assessments and the revised rates . based upon property va l ue increase of $14,805.35 must be funded by the city if the project is to be constructed. It is recommended that funds from state aid maintenance money be used to augment the city share of costs necessary. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the assessment roll be revised as documented herein. jw Attachments Proposed Increase in PIN Assessment Property Value 11--29--22--31--0020 $ 6 ,683.80 4 9775.20 11--29-22--31--0021 31171.40 3 ,171 .46 11-29--22-31-0029 1 2 ,1 02.38 10 ,194.58 11-29-22-31-0030 885.60 885.60 11-29-22-31-0031 3,387m00 2 , 03b .2O 11-29-22-31-0032 7 , 773.00 3 , 773.40 11-29-22-34-0015 5 , 878.86 2 9381 .54 11-29-22-34-0031 5 ,350.58 3,210a35 A new assessment roll incorporating reductions of proposed assessments to a 1 eve l that can be sustained as increase to property value is attached. The difference between the original l y proposed assessments and the revised rates . based upon property va l ue increase of $14,805.35 must be funded by the city if the project is to be constructed. It is recommended that funds from state aid maintenance money be used to augment the city share of costs necessary. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the assessment roll be revised as documented herein. jw Attachments D/P NOR, 5862 PROJECT NO. 85-26 COPE AVE. HAZEL/ARIB_ ASSESSMENT ROLL PAGE 1 OF 10 10-21-1988 ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT SANITARY SEWER ���*�.(���**�1.810�.=���1,!�.60 FF AT ***$31.810 EA. =*.*******$0.00 WATER MAIN **����.(������^(� FF AT ***$25.000 �^=������^� ********$0.02) STREET ********. .000 **��l�.K���*��.���.=��8,3�.� AT ***$55.550 EA. = ********$0.00 STORM STORM SEWER (W) SF SF AT ****$0.090 EA. = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (RL) ********0 000 * . GF AT ****$0 090 . EA = . ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (RM) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.140 EA. = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (RH) ****49,275.000 SF AT ****$0.180 EA. = ****$8,869.50 STORM SEWER (BW) ********0 000 * ~ SF AT ****$0 180 ^ ^ EA = ********$0.0 0 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE *********0.000 EACH AT **$425.800 EA. = ********$0.00 WATER SERVICE *********0.000 EACH AT **$691.180 EA. = ********$0.00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ****�5 2 01.4 5 , ***$17 202 v ~ 00 11-29-22-31-0020 SANITARY SEWER '���***�.^�����1.810�.=����,��.� ���*�.(���**�1.810�.=���1,!�.60 WATER MAIN *********0.000 FF AT ***$25.000 EA. = ********$0.02) STREET ********. .000 FF AT ***$55.550 EA. = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (W) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. = ********$0.0Q STORM SEWER (RL) ****27,120.0N0 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. = ****$2,440.80 STORM SEWER (RM) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.140 EA. = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (RH) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.18N EA. = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (BW) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.180 EA. = 00 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE *********1.000 EACH AT **$425.800 EA. = ******$425.80 WATER SERVICE *********0.000 EACH, AT **$691.180 EA. 00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ****�5 2 01.4 5 , 11-29-22-31-0021 �������R ���*�.(���**�1.810�.=���1,!�.60 WATER MAIN ��*��*0.(���***�^���^=� STREET *********0.000 , FF , STORM SEWER (W) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (RL) *****9,300.01b0 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. $8�.0 o STORM��R ' (�) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.140 �. STORM SEWER (RH) *********0 0N0 . SF AT ****$0 180 ^ ^ EA = ********$0. 00 STORM SEWER (BW) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.180 EA. = ********$0.00 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE *********1.0N0 EACH AT **$425.800 EA. WATER SERVICE *********0.000 EACH AT **$691.180 EA. = ********$0.00 ****$3,171.40 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = DIP NO, 5862 ITEM PROJECT N0, 85-88 COVE AVE, HAZELIARIEL ASSESSMENT ROLL QUANTITY PER RATE .......... SANITARY SEWER ********80.000 FF AT ***$31.,810 EA. - WATER MAIN *********0.000 FF AT ***$25, 000 EA. - STREET *********0,000 FF AT ***$55.550 EA. STORM SEWER t W i *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. = STORM SEWER (RL) *****9,300,000 SF AT ****$0.050 EA. -- STORM SEWER (RM) ****#****0.000 SF AT ****$0.140 EA. = STORM SEWER (RFD *********0.000. SF AT ****$0.180 EA. = STORM SEWER (BW) *********0,000 SF AT ****'$0. 180 EA, SANITARY SEWER SERVICE *********1,000 EACH AT **$425.800 EA. = WATER SERVICE *********0.000 EACH AT **$851.180 EA. = TOTAL ASSESSMENT SANITARY SEWER ********60.000 FF AT ***$31.810 EA. WATER MAIN *********0.000 FF AT ***$*`5.000 EA. = STREET *****--**.0.0+0 FF AT ***0b. 550 EA. STORM SEWER (W) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. STORM SEWER (RLI *****91300.000 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. == STORIMI SEWER (RM) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.140 EA. = STORM SEWER (RH) *********0,000 SF AT ****$0.180 EA. = STORM SEWER (BW) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.180 EA. = SANITARY SEWER SERVICE *********0.000 EACH AT **$4'2'5.800 EA. WATER SERVICE *****-***0.000 EACH AT **SSS. 180 EA, TOTAL ASSESSMENT = SANITARY SEWER ********50.000 FF AT ***$31.810 EA. = WATER MAIN *********0.000 FF AT ***$25.000 EA. STREET *********0.000 FF AT ***$55.550 EA. STORM SEWER (W) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. STORM SEWER (RL) *********0.000 SF AT ****$-0.050 EA. STORM SEWER t Rfi i i *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.140 EA. = STORM SEWER t RH 3 *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.180 EA. = STORM SEWER (BW) *****91300-000 SF AT ****$0.180 EA. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE *********0.000 EACH AT **$485.800 EA. = WATER SERVICE *#*******0.000 EACH AT **$851.180 EA. TOTAL ASSESSMENT = PAGE 2 OF 10 10-E1-1388 ASSESSMENT 11-29-E2-31-0022 ****$1, 508. 60 ********$0. 00 ********$0.00 ******$837.00 ********$0. 00 ********$0. 00 ********$0.00 ******$45.80 00 ****$3, 171.. 40 11-25-22-31-0023 11-`5-22-31-00`4 RAGE 3 OF 10 18-21-1988 PROJECT NO. 85-26 CORE AVE. HAZEL / A R I EL D/R NO. 5862 ITEM SANITARY SEWER WATER MAIN STREET . STORM SEWER (W) STORM SEWER (RL) STORM SEWER ( RM) STORM SEWER (RH) STORM SEWER (BW) SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE TOTAL ASSESSMENT = SANITARY SEWER WATER MAIN STREET STORM SEWER ( W ) STORM SEWER (RL) STORM SEWER ( RM) STORM SEWER (RH) STORM SEWER (BW) SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE TOTAL ASSESSMENT W SANITARY SEWER WATER MAIN STREET STORM SEWER (W) STORM SEWER (RL) STORM SEWER (RM) STORM SEWER (RH) STORM SEWER (BW) SANITARY SEWER SERVICE MATER SERVICE TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ASSESSMENT ROLL QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT *******14:0.000 0100 ******* 1 * o. 000 000 *********0'000 *********0.00 0 ****20,820-000 7t * * * 75 s 000 ********G0.000 ****�-****Q►. 000 *********0.000 *********0.000 ****109410.000 *********1.000 *********1.000 FF FF FF SF SF SF SF SF EACH EACH FF FF FF SF SF SF SF SF EACH EACH FF FF FF SF SF SF SF SF EACH EACH AT ***$31,810 EA, = AT ***$25.000 EA. -= AT ***$00.000 EA. AT EA. AT ****$0.090 EA. = AT ****$0. 140EA. = AT ****$0,180 EA. = AT ****$0.180 EA. AT **$420.800 EA. = AT **$691,180 EA. = AT ***$x,1.810 EA. = AT ***$25,.000 EA. - AT -**0. 550 EA. = AT ****$0.090 EA. = AT ****$0.090 EA. AT ****$0.140 EA. AT ****$0.1180 EA. AT ****$0.180 EA. = AT **$425.800 EA r AT **$b"91.180 EA. = AT ***$%"7j l . 8 1 0 EA. = AT ***$L'5.000 EA. _ AT ***$55. 550 EA. = AT ****$0.090 EA. AT ****$0.090= EA. =- AT **- a� �s 140 EA. w AT ****$0.180 EA. = AT ****$0.180 EA. �- AT **$42-'5,800 0 EA. AT **$691.180 EA. 11--29-22-31-0025 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 .00 ****$35 348, 00 ********$0.00 ** $235 348, 00 11--29-22-31--0028 817.20 001 ********$0. 00 ** **$01.001 ********$0.00 ****$� j 7 47. G0 ***$1E, 4c,4. 7V 11-29-22-31-0027 PROJECT NO. 85-26 COPE AVE. HAZEL/AR I EL D/P NO, 5862 ITEM SANITARY SEWER WATER MAIN STREET STORM SEWER (W) STORM SEDER (RL) STORM SEWER (RN) STORM SEDER (RH) STORM SEWER (BW) SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE TOTAL ASSESSMENT = SANITARY SEWER MATER MAIN STREET STORM SEWER (W) STORM SEWER (RL) STORM SEWER (RM) STORM SEWER (RH ) STORM SEWER (BW) SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE TOTAL ASSESSMENT = SANITARY SEWER MATER MAIN STREET STORM SEWER (W) STORM SEWER (RL) STORM SEWER (RM) STORM SEWER (RI -11) STORM SEWER kBW) SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ASSESSMENT ROLL QUANT I Til #######.##0.000 #### 15 '40.000 *******120.000 *****57 580.000 ********#0.000 ##*******0.000 ********Q, Qleio *****97840,000 ##*##****0.000 *****##**0. 0001 ********#0.0010 **#*##**#0.000 PER FF FF FF SF SF SF SF SF EACH EACH FF FF EF SF SF SF SF SF EACH EACH FF FF FF SF SF SF SF SF EACH EACH RATE AT ***$31,810 EA. = AT *#*$25.000 EA. = AT ***$55.550 EA. = AT ****$0.090 EA. = AT **#*$0.090 EA. = AT ****$0,140 EA. = AT ****$0.180 EA. = AT *#**$0.180 EFS. = AT **$4:5.800 EA. = AT **$691.180 EA. = AT ***-:-oS s . 810 EA. = AT ***$25.000 EA. AT ***$'%=j5.550 EA. = AT ***#$0.050 EA. = AT *##*$0.090 EA. AT ****$0.140 EA. = AT ****$0.180 EA. AT *#*#0. 180 EA. AT **$420.8010 EA. = AT **$691.180 EA. AT -#*51. 810 EA. = ALT 000 EA. AT ### 55.5 21 EA. AT #***$0.090 EA. = AT ****$0.090 EA. AT ****$0.140 EA. w AT ****$0.180 EA. AT ****$O. 180t EA. = AT **$425.800 EA. �- AT **$b"91.180 EA. M PAGE 4 OF 10 10-21-1988 ASSESSMENT ---------- 11-25-22-31-00`8 ********$0. 00 00 ***#****$0.00 00 **#*$17 571. 80 ********$0. 00 ********$0.00 ####****$0. 001 ********$0.00 #***$l l 3371. 60 11-25-22-31-00E9 817. 2-'0 **#*###*$0. 0113 ###*$4 7153. �r 1 ******$502'4 :0 ********$0.00 ********$0. 00 ********$0. 00 #####*$ 80 18 ***$101194.79 11--25-`1-31-00�►0 PROJECT NO. 85-26 COPE AVE. HAZEL/ARIEL PAGE 5 OF 10 10-21-1988 ASSESSMENT ROLL ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT 11-29-22-31-0031 SANITARY SEWER *********0.00N FF AT ***$31.810 EA. = ********$0.00 WATER MAIN *********0.000 FF AT ***$25.000 EA. = ********$0.00 STREET ********35.670 FF AT ***$55.550 EA. = ****$11981.47 STORM SEWER (W) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (RL) *******600.000 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. = *******$54.00 STORM SEWER (RM) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.140 EA. = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (RH) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.180 EA. = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (BW) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.180 EA. = ********$0.00 _ SANITARY SEWER SERVICE *********0"000 EACH AT **$425.800 EA. = ********$0.00 WATER SERVICE *********0.000 EACH AT **$691.180 EA. = ********$0.00 035.47 ****$2, TOTAL ASSESSMENT = 11-29-22-31-0032 SANITARY SEWER *********0.000 FF AT ***$31.810 EA. = ================ ********$0.00 WATER MAIN *********0.000 FF AT ***$25.000 EA. STREET ********48.000 FF AT ***$55.550 EA. = ****$2,666.4N STORM SEWER (W) *********0 000 . SF AT ****$0 090 ^ ^ EA = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (RL) ****12,30N.000 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. = ****$1,107.00 STORM SEWER (RM) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.140 EA. = 00 STORM SEWER (RH) *********0 000 . SF AT ****$0 180 . EA = ~ ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (BW) SF AT ****$0.180 EA. = **�*****$0.00 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE EACH AT **$425.800 EA. = ********$0.N0 WATER SERVICE *********0.000 EACH AT **$691.180 EA. = ********$0.00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ****$3 ,773.40 11-29-22-31-0033 SANITARY SEWER ********80.000 FF AT ***$31.810 EA. = ================ ****$2,544.80 WATER MAIN *********0.000 FF AT ***$25.000 EA. = ********$0.00 STREET ********80.000 FF AT ***$55.550 EA. = ****$4,444.00 STORM SEWER (W) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (RL) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. = ********$0.N0 STORM SEWER (RM) *********0.N00 GF AT ****$0.140 EA. STORM SEWER (RH) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.180 EA. = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (BW) ****26 300 000 , . SF AT ****$0 180 ^ ^ EA = ****$4,734.00 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE *********2.000 EACH AT **$425.800 EA. = ******$851.60 WATER SERVICE *********2.000 EACH AT **$691.180 EA. = ****$1,382.3.- ***$13,956.76 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = PAGE 6 OF 10 10-21-1988 PROJECT NO. 85-26 COPE AVE. HAZEL/AR%B' ASSESSMENT ROLL ITEM ��e**1�.(�����31.810�.=���4,��.17 12UANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT MAIN *******15-tv.000FF AT*�$r'-"'5.0010 EA. =****$3,925^010 11-29-22-31-0034 SANITARY SEWER. *******200.000 � � ��31 810 �~ = ****$b-1362.00 WATER MAIN *********0.000 FF AT ***$25.000 EA. = ****$5,000.00 STREET *******200.000 FF AT ***$55.550 EA~ = ***$11,110.00 STORM SEWER (W) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. = ********$0~00 STORM SEWER (RL) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (RM) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.140 EA. = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (RH) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.180 EA. = ********$N.N0 STORM SEWER (BW) ****651700.000 SF AT ****$0.180 EA. = ***$111826.00 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE *********4.000 EACH AT **$425.800 EA. = ****$1,703.2N WATER SERVICE *********4.000 EACH AT **$691.180 EA. = ****$2,764.72 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ***$38,765.92 11-29-22-31-�035 SANITARY SEWER *******160.000 FF AT ***$31.8101 EA. ===== WATER MAIN *******160.000 FF AT ***$25.000 EA. = ****$4,000.00 STREET *******160.000 FF AT ***$55.550 EA. = ****$8,888.00 STORM SEWER (W) ****161420.000 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. = ****$1,477.80 STORM SEWER (RL) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER'(RM) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.140 EA. = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (RH) *********0.00N SF AT ****$0.180 EA. = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (BW) SF AT ****$0.180 EA. = ********00 $0. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE *********0.000 EACH AT **$425.800 EA. = ********$N.00 WATER SERVICE *********0.000 EACH AT **$691.180 EA. = ********$0.00 ***$19,455.40 -TOTAL ASSESSMENT = 11-29-22-31-0036 SANITARY SEWER ��e**1�.(�����31.810�.=���4,��.17 WATER MAIN *******15-tv.000FF AT*�$r'-"'5.0010 EA. =****$3,925^010 STREET *******157.000 FF AT ***$55.550 EA. = ****$8,721.35 STORM SEWER (W) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (RL) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (RM) ****20,960.000 SF AT ****$0.140 EA. = ****$2,934.40 STORM SEWER (RH) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.180 EA. = ********$N.00 STORM SEWER (BW) 100,9G5.000 S AT ****$0.1 . ***$18,173.70 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE *********3.000 EACH AT **$425.800 EA. = ****$1,277.40 WATER SERVICE *********3 000 ^ EACH AT **$691 180 ^ EA. = ****$2,073.54 ***$42,N99.5G PROJECT NO. 85-26 COPE AVE^ HAZEI/ARIEL PAGE 7 OF 10 10-21-1988 ASSESSMENT ROLL ' ITEM GLANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT ---------- SANITARY SEWER^ *********0.000 FF AT ��31 810 �. = ***�***� � ^ WATER MAIN *********0.000 FF AT ***$25.000 EA. = ********$0, CIO STREET *********0~000 FF AT ***$55^550 EAU = ********$0^00 STORM SEWER (W) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (RL) ********0 000 * ~ SF AT ****$0 090 . EA = . ********$0.0N STORM SEWER (RM) *********0 000 . SF AT ****$0.140 EA. = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (RH) ****11,719.000 SF AT ****$0.180 EA. = ****$2,1N9.42 STORM SEWER (BW) ********0 000 * . SF AT ****$0.180 EA. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE *********0.000 EACH AT **$425.800 EA. = 00 WATER SERVICE ********0 000 * ^ EACH AT **$691 180 ^ ~ EA = ********$0 00 ^ TOTAL ASSESSMENT ****$2 109 42 11 SANITARY SEWER *********0.000 FF AT ***$31.810 EA. = ********$0.00 WATER MAIN *********0.000 FF AT ***$25.000 EA. = ********$0.00 STREET *********0.000 FF AT ***$55.550 EA. = ********$0.N0 STORM SEWER (W) SF AT ****$0.090 EA. = 00 STORM SEWER (RL) *********0.0N0 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (RM) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.140 EA. = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (RH) ****18,484.000 SF AT ****$0.180 EA. = ****$3,327.12 STORM SEWER (BW) SF AT ****$0.180 EA. = ********$0.00 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE *********0.000 EACH AT **$425.800 EA. = ********$0.00 WATER SERVICE *********0.000 EACH AT **$691.180 EA. = ********$0.00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT ****$3 327 12 11-29-2-2-3270010 SANITARY SEWEER *********0.000 FF A T*** $31.810E 1�0.I'D ILI WATER MAIN *********0.000 FF AT ***$25.000 EA. = ********$@.0 0 STREET *********0.000 FF AT ***$55.550 EA. = ********$N.00 STORM SEWER (W) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (RL) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.0912.1 EA. = ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (RM) *********0 000 . SF AT ****$0 140 ^ EA = . ********$0.00 STORM SEWER (RH) ****481250.000 SF AT ****$0.180 EA. 00 STORM SEWER (BW) ********0 000 * . SF AT ****$0 180 ~ EA . SANITARY SEWER SERVICE *********0.000 EACH AT **$425.800 EA. = ********$0.00 WATER SERVICE *********0.000 EACH AT **$G91.180 EA. = ********$0.00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = , ****$8 685 0N n ^ PROJECT NO^ 85-26 ASSESSMENT ROLL QUANTITY PER RATE SANITARY SEWER FF AT ***$31.81N EA, = WATER MAIN *********01@00 FF. AT ***$25,000 EAS = STREET *********0.000 FF AT ***$55.550 EA~ = STORM SEWER (W) *********01000 SF AT ****$N 090 . , EA = STORM SEWER (RL) SF AT****$0.090 EA. = STORM SEWER (RM) * . ********0 000 SF AT ****$0 140 . . EA = STORM SEWER (RH) *******440.000 SF AT ****$0.180 EA. = STORM SEWER (BW) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.180 EA. = SANITARY SEWER SERVICE *********0.000 EACH AT **$425.800 EA. = WATER SERVICE *********0.000 EACH AT **$691.180 EA. = TOTAL ASSESSMENT = SANITARY SEWER *********0.000 FF AT ***$31.810 EA. = WATER MAIN *********0.000 FF AT ***$25.000 EA. = STREET *******104.840 FF AT ***$55.550 EA. = STORM SEWER (W) �********0.000 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. = STORM SEWER (RL) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. = STORM SEWER (RM) ********0 0N0 * . SF AT ****$0 l40 . EA = ^ STORM SEWER (RH) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.180 EA. = STORM SEWER (BW) *********0.000, SF AT ****$0 180 EA = , SANITARY SEWER SERVICE *********0.000 EACH AT **$425.800 EA. = WATER SERVICE *********0.000 EACH AT **$691.180 EA. = TOTAL ASSESSMENT = SANITARY SEWER *********0.000 FF AT ***$31.810 EA. = WATER MAIN *********0.000 FF AT ***$25.000 EA. = STREET ********42.900 FF AT ***$55.550 EA. = STORM SEWER (W) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.090 EA. = STORM SEWER (RL) *********0.000. SF AT ****$0 090 EA = . STORM SEWER (RM) *********0.W00 SF AT ****$0.140 EA. = STORM SEWER (RH) *********0.000 SF AT ****$0.18N EA. = STORM SEWER (BW> *********0.0N0 SF AT ****$0.180 EA. = SANITARY SEWER SERVICE *********0.000 EACH AT **$425.800 EA. = WATER SERVICE *********0.000 EACH AT **$691.180 = EA.TOTAL ASSESSMENT = PAGE 8 OF 20 10-21-1988 ASSESSMENT 11-29-22-32-0011 00 00 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 00 0 00 ********$0.00 11-29-22-34-0001 ********$0.00 00 86 ********$0.00 00 ********$0.00 00 ********$0.00 00-1 11-29-2,22-1-34-0015 PROJECT NO. 85-26 COPE AVE, IEL D/P NO, 5862 SANITARY SEWER WATER MAIN STREET STORM SEWER (W) STORM SEWER (RL) STORM SEWER (RM) STORM SEWER (RH) STORM SEWER (BW) SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE TOTAL ASSESSMENT = SANITARY SEWER WATER MAIN STREET FF STORM SEWER (W) STORM SEWER (RL) STORM SEWER (RM) STORM SEWER (RH) STORM SEWER (BW) SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVI�E TOTAL ASSESSMENT = SANITARY SEWER WATER MAIN STREET STORM SEWER (W) STORM SEWER (RL) STORM SEWER (RM) STORM SEWER (RH) STORM SEWER (BW) SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ASSESSMENT ROLL QUANTITY *******I70.470 *********0.000 *******170.470 000 000 *********0.000 *********0.000 *******614.790 *******G04.790 ****74,488.000 000 *********0.000 000 *********7.000 FF AT ***$31.810 EA. FF AT ***$25.000 EA. FF AT ***$55.550 EA. SF AT ****$0.090 EA. SF AT ****$0.090 EA. SF AT ****$0.140 EA. SF AT ****$0.180 EA. SF AT ****$0.180 EA. EACH AT **$425.80N EA. EACH AT **$691.180 EA. FF AT***$31.810 ***$31.810 EA. FF AT ***$25.000 EA. FF AT ***$55.550 EA. BF AT ****$0.090 EA. SF AT ****$N.090 EA. SF AT ****$0.140 EA. SF AT ****$0.180 EA. SF AT ****$0.180EA^ EA. EACH AT **$425~800 EA. EACH AT **$691.180 EA. FF AT ***$31.810 EA. FF AT ***$25.0W0 EA. FF AT ***$55.550 EA. SF AT ****$0.090 EA. SF AT ****$0.090 EA. SF AT ****$0.140 EA. SF AT ****$0.180 EA. SF AT ****$0.180 EA. EACH AT **$425.80N EA. EACH AT **$691.180 EA. PAGE 9 OF 10 10-21-1988 ASSESSMENT 11-29-22-34-0031 11-29-22-354-0032 ° D/P NO. 586E TEM 27 PARCELS ASSESSED 85-26 COPE AVE, HAZEL/ARIEL PROJECT IVC ASSESSMENT ROLL QUANTITY PER RATE SANITARY SEWER ***** 1s 995, 660 WATER MAIM ***** 1, 131.790 FF AT � 7,130 2, 07 ST BEET SEWER t ** 169 420.000 -STORM STORM R SEWER (RL) �� 173, 068.000 STORM SEWER t RM) ****20,9600000 STORM SEWER (RH) *** 1 E8, 158.000 STORM SEWER (BW) ���ESE, 0'95, 000 ********E5,000 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE ****$1,9 477.80 WATER TOTAL SERVICE AMOUNT ASSESSED FOR THIS PROJECT= PAGE 10 OF 10 10—E1-1988 ASSESSMENT BRAND TOTALS FF AT ***$31.810 EA. _ ***$63, 481.94 F F AT ***$85.000 EA. = ����EB, E94.75 FF A T ***$55.550 EA. _ **$115,l6-84,57 SF AT ****x0.090 EA. _ ****$1,9 477.80 SF A T ****s0, 090 _ EA. ***$151576,12 SF AT ****$0.140 EA. _ ****$2,934,40 5F AT ****$0,180 EA. _ ***$23-1070,24 SF AT ****$0.180 EA. _ ***$45,377,10 EACH A T **$485.800 EA. _ = ***$101645,00 ���� 15E05.9G EACH AT ���891.180 EA. , **$321,447,89 H -S ITEM H-5 - COPE AVENUE ASSESSMENT APPEAL Material will be available by the end of this week. BANNIGAN &KELLY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING STH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 (612) 224-3781 JOHN F. BANNIGAN, JR. PATRICK J. KELLY JAMES J. HANTON October 17, 1988, fiction by Council: Endorsed— ejected._ Date JANET WILEBSKI LEGAL ASSISTANT Mr. Kenneth Haider Director of Public Works 1830 East County Road B ' Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: Control. of Truck Traffic -on Gervais Avenue West of Kennard Dear Mr. Haider:, Enclosed find a proposed form of ordinance adding to the Maplewood Code a Section entitled Article 8, Section 29-190. In addition to the ordinance, the signing which Maplewood must use in order to properly notify the public of the restriction is governed by Minnesota law and specifically by the "Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devises" p Y (for streets and 'highways), Minnesota Rules, HE370.M6, 1986. I presume that the City of Maplewood Public Works Department has a copy of that Manual. However, I am enclosing select portions of the Manual which refer to the type of signing that would be suggested by the restriction in the ordinance. Pages 2B-201 21, 22, 34, 34A, 34B, and 35 are appended for your. reference. The type of signing provided in the Manual for truck restrictions calls for the type pictured on page 2B-20 and the required sign sizes are shown thereunder. Alternate types are suggested such as "No Trucks". In addition to sign size and type, the following guidelines should be noted: 1. Signs must clearly indicate the type of traffic that is excluded. 2. The lettering must be of adequate for legibility. 3. The signs must be conspicuously placed at the entrances to the restricted roadway. 4. They must be placed on the right hand side of the roadway approximately twenty-five feet from the intersection and be clearly visible to all drivers and others turning into the roadway. Note that a supplementary sign may be necessary on the left hand side of the road in order to properly put the public on notice. Mr. Kenneth -Haider Page 2 October 17, 1988 If you are going to include weight restrictions as to the prohibited vehicles.., there should be a weight limit sign. Please refer to pages 2'B-34 and 2B-35 for additional types of signs that show weight limits. Your ordinance provides for no trucks (at all.) which have a weight of over 9,000 pounds, however, that weight is only suggested as typical and can be changed by the City Council. If weight is a clear factor in the restriction, the weight should be included. on the sign. Please note that the proposed form of ordinance allows for additional: streets (besides Gervais Avenue) to be included in,. the ordinance and they need only be added to the list *as the City wishes to ammend the ordinance in the future. Please refer to the City's own copy of the Manual for further details. Sincerely, BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. Janet wilebski JW:cd Enclosure cc Mr. Michael McGuire 4. `" ORDINANCE ILIO. AN ORDINANCE RESTRICTING COMMERCIAL VEHICLES/TRUCKS FROM CERTAIN STREETS, AVENUES, AND BOULEVARDS THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The following is added to the Maplewood Code, Article VIII, Section 29-190: l ARTICLE VIII. STREETS, ROADS, AVENUES, PARKWAYS, BOULEVARDS, ETC. WHERE COMMERCIAL VEHICLES ARE PROHIBITED Sec. 29-190(a). Definitions. The following words and. phrases, when used in this Chapter, shall, for the purposes of this Chapter, have the meanings ascribed to them herein: Commercial Vehicle means every self-propelled motor vehicle, other than aassen er vehicle or a vehicle used for the purpose of transporting P g passengers for hire, and shall include every truck, truck tractor or road- tractor oadtractor or combination of truck or road tractor and trailer or semi-trialer designed primarily for carrying commodities, other than people, whether g laden or unladen. Gross Weight and Gross Vehicle Weight mean the actual unloaded weight of the vehicle, either a single unit truck or tractor -trailer combination, plus the weight of the maximum load for which such vehicle is actually or fully loaded. Any commercial vehicle operated or driven in the City of Maplewood on streets other than state trunk highways or truck routes shall have stenciled in a conspicous place on each side of the cab of the vehicle the gross weight ,of the vehicle or combined vehicles as herein defined. Passenger Vehicle means any motor vehicle designed and used for carrying of not more than eight (8) persons, including. vehicles known as station wagons, but excluding motorcycles. Sec.. 29-190(b). Avenues, parkways, boulevards, streets and roads where commercial vehicles/trucks are prohibited& following streets, avenues, boulevards, parkways or roads are designated to The foil g be roads upon which no person shall drive, propel or draw or cause to be driven, propelled or drawn, any truck or other commercial vehicle licensed by the State of Minnesota .! for a gross weight in excess of nine thousand (9,000) pounds except at intersecting street crossings,, except for one block between any two (2) consecutive intersecting streets or avenues, and except where it is otherwise impossible to reach a destination for the purpose of making a delivery to or returning from any lot or premises, when necessary .. to do so upon or along any such street, avenue, parkway, boulevard or road in the City fo Maplewood: Street or Avenue From 1 To G ervais Avenue Sec: 29--190(c). Government/emergency'vehicles. Theprovisions of this Chapter shall not apply to emergency vehicles of the police department, fire department, division of public health, nor to any public utility, vehicle where actually engaged in the performance of emergency duties necessary 'to be performed ormed bY said public departments or public utilities, nor to any vehicle owned by orerformin work for the United States of America, the State of Minnesota, or the P g City of Maplewood. Section 2. This Ordinance shall take affect upon its passage and publication. Passed by P the Maplewood City Council this day of , 1988• Mayor ATTEST: City, Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: City - Manager FROM: Randy Johnson, Associate Planner SUBJECT: PUD Time Extension and Revision LOCATION: Ivy Avenue and Ferndale Street APPLICANT/OWNER: The Knights Group (Ken Gervais) PROJECT: Beaver Creek Apartments DATE: October 10, 1988 SUMMARY Introduction ,QulorA, b1i L -------- Mi o d OL e Reflected Date of Conditions I The applicant is requesting a one-year time extension for the Beaver Creek Apartment planned unit development (PUD)O' Staff is proposing several "housek-eeping" revisions to the PUD coed itions n These changes incorporate several previously agreed upon items, delete completed items and delete items now addressed by city code or design review board conditionsO Eiiscussion Construction is underway for two of the three approved buildings (page 6) . No decision has been made when or if the third building will be constructed. Recommendation Approve a.one-year time extension for the Beaver Creek Apartment planned unit development and approve, the resolution on page 8 to revise the conditions .of approval as follows (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed rossed out): � : ��trtdscap�rtg-parts--arta--�ttt�d�rr�-e�eaatt�rts-rnttst--�e-'s�tt�m�tt�� (Completed 9-15-87) parj,&+mg-areas -sha++-be-st riped -am d - a++ -b+ t Uffl+ mods- Bress (City code) cause- SMY-dm (CDRB condition). 4-. No-e6jacem t - property- sh a++ r0"S m emoved- due -t 0-C emst ruct+ cm -c+- t he- S*t e-sh ft++-be-reP+ aced- by_" e app+feamt7 (CDRB condition) b eem-eomp4-eted-by-oec"pamcy7 (CDRB condition) 6-6 e,-- S"bm+ tt ed-+or-sta+ +-Spp rove+- be+ ore-s-bul T* +d +mg - cr-g radi ng perfn+t'-is-+ssued-U (satisfied) 1. The northerl-y facing roof area for the northwest structure ma d rain to Jim's Prairie, provided pred evelo men t­ rUno++ levels are not exceeded. All other impervious surface area shall drain awa from Jim's Prairie. *Fan dse ap im g -t o-gi m-4 s- Pra+ri e -ss-+ easib+e7-provided-t hat- rum -o+ + 4ah.et++-mct-exceed-predeve+opmemt-+eve+s-. --The- park+mq- +ots-sha+ + not -be -a++ owed - t The-drft+MSSe-P+Sn -sha++ 2. No herbicides,- pesticides or fertilizers shall be appl_ied to an area thatdrainsto the unless the type, amount and location are approved --bythe city. Inri t"M +nads-im-p+ see- be -issued-* - t completed ) 3 as 1 The emergency exit road shat I be constructed from the apartment project to Maryland Avenue to support emergency. vehicles and the pathway shall be paved from the apartments to the proposed private street in the condominium project prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. A public easement for wa+kway-and emergency vehicle access shat I be recorded from the apartment parking lot to Maryland Avenue, over the proposed path and future private street in the Beaver Lake condominium p'roject. Am-eddit+ome+-e+ght. +cot - be -recorded- +rom- the- e --vest- o+-b"i+ding S B---arta-- . The emergency vehicle access must be maintained and kept free of obstructions by the respective property owners. (The Parks Director dropped the trail requirements.) f cot-"* d e-- + ackab +e -C he+m-++ mk-gate- she++-be-inst 8++ed- st-t he -en Ci any-9mad+m 9-cf- the- ap artmem t-s+te-, --The-+emee-sh a++- them- bectme the-property-o+-the-city7 (satisfied) 4a Before U -M I&W.0dimij an occupancy permit is issued, a statement shall be recorded with the property, granting the city the right to burn Jim's Prairie and maintain the fence alonSjhe south boundary--- of Jim's Prairie that is located approximatel--y five feet into the apartment r o ert rThe lan2uage of this statement shall be aRproved by the city --.I. A- d eve+ ep ergs--agreemem t - she+ + � be -prey+ ded-before.-+ gsdame e -m -F Measdilmles-8 (completed) +97 +m -ret urn-+Or-C+tY-SP prove+ -O+- teant-ex empt- mortgage- revenue d- Beaver- ereek-Comd am-im+Um-s+tes- et - p The- deve+ Oper- she+ +-then -:f h -j 4S rem" ( comp l eted) 5n !In+. Approval includes the site plan enclosed in the January 16, 1985 staff report. Any changes that result in an increase in density or change in building type or site plan shall require a public hearing and approval by the city council. Pp (Building permit issued) 6a This ap-proval sugersedes the conditions of initial al?proval---.. 51ranted February REFERENCE Past Actions 2-11-85: Council approved a conditional use permit for the Beaver Creek planned unit developments Approval was subject to 15 conditions. (Re+'er to the ,recommendation sections) 12-23-85: Council granted preliminary approval +or $8,500,000 in tax-exempt + inancing for this project a The app icant withdrew his initial request for tax -increment +inancings I 9-15-87,: The community design review board approved landscaping and architectural plans for this development. The applicant agreed that he 11 woul d not use any + ert i I i z ers pest i c i des, or herbicides, except approved natural +ertilizers." City -C-Odde Section 36-442 (e) states that upon initial review of compliance with the conditions of a conditional use permit, "the council may specify an indefinite term or a specific term, not to exceed five years, for subsequent reviews. A conditional use permit shall remain in effect as long as the conditions agreed upon are observed but nothing 'in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official -controls to change the status of conditional uses s" jl Attachments in Location Map 2s Site Plan 3a Letter 4s Resolution OW • r R R •- . .. A .R2 I F F R3 : R � � LOC (PUD) - • .I ` A3 R3 iR2)L F • F R3 . • � [: I F wig � 2) Pool Mt Rwwonow M2 I041, t*RfiL AK w0 R 3 '• :: -f:�: •ti: :ti's: ' R , PROPOSED SITE -BEAVER CREEK APARTMENTS ~'��•f ti�ti • •:= ti�ti�: Lq L r Pte. BEAVER CREEK CONDOMINIUMS. R wt R R —t -STERLING GLEN QUADS. 3C CR' f • R • �• k R C R L - k/ �. LOCATION MAP . 5 Attachment One Olt • I . •• 1 ♦ • I • • • .• .,• +•+i-� � r� � • ♦ • `� `� ��\.��, • .rte/ / / . r • t POP • • ♦ / •• •� •1 7 ` • + - -. i.r� + Nom' ���• 1 1 / ♦16♦ • ��..:•.�M� • lop I lob doe It \,POP '�- / •i -ice'-.il �yN•'IwraC -.�•`��/ • ' • ��♦ 40' +� ~% : 1 --- JIM'S PRAIRIE -''-''.-'__ '1 �' ~==wlr�.--- ;- , --• ••;•. •, ! .00 10•�� i / • / I• '�r� . ttom, / •/► OW ••�•��•I \ � • ,.-.--••• `, •../ •`` , ,-ski ' /`',/' •e+tiy, v \ / / �.••• ' �~'�•`♦ I i 0. do/ '%(\ tri •. . 0` • I =• ` I / it dO' OF dop ♦ • or dip it Ob an do do 64 o, dop qb 1 • / ••a•./ •••' )Y r••w;• �i� 111 110 11 • •• ♦ ' ♦` PIP 14 .0 GITI! DATA 8 Sitsoft as ',•9� ► 1 1 / ' lumon slam we na" .. !'� .. ^ /i . / O• f IV I 4b lb Ol dO- 1 /—�� ;• fir• •\ •'• � ; 1 •.�' � ' ,' . •4p qb.• woo, p oo 1 • • •• • • • r • 1 •,I•I ; ' •••••I I f',' •• •� . PRELIMINARY. UTILITY SCNE1/Ai1C • • j ' ; • • • ' •BEAVER CREEK APARTMENTS •' • • 1 I. ; / « . ':RITC" PLAN •! we •. •••• ...' ♦ I 1 1 • •lb 0 IVY fall :: -:t�,, ..•fit � . 1 + . - - - =- ' s __ 1 1 t 1 11111 1 '• 1 i •-• 4%,."/ 1 � II�IN 1 1 1 111 111 II 1 '' 1 1 1.1 1111 1 1 , •1111111• i� .• / �� W J Q O Z _ Ce. W . LL,. SITE PLAN BEAVER CREEK APARTMENTS 6 Attachment Two_ r _� t..: -... ..-.ti..,.. [-: - .�vtv.�..-..��.>. -ar fir,-:�<.• ;•��• :sT. .....�,.: __ ,--n'r �t�+-.�•'T' .-. - _ - .. - � , .� .. t _ ... _. . _ .:,zx. _ c:r..n'• • :nom-••.*s-•...fi.-r.--.�, ti;p..,• : r. ,. a. a r : „-a- h•r /.•+-� fir"' .. c The Knights Group 2419 N. Margaret St, No, St. Paul, Mn. 55109 August 8, 1988 Maplewood City Council City of Maplewxod 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, Mn. 55109 Honorable City Council hers, The Knights Group hereby requests the City of Maplewood to grant a one (1) year extention of the Beaver Creek Apartment Plan Unit Development. Thank you for your prompt consideration in this matter. Sincerely, enn D. rvais i rtner 7 Attachment Three Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of heap lewoodq Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of q 1988.at7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a conditional use permit revision to amend the Beaver Creek Apartment planned unit development (PUD) at the following -described property: That part of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 lying southeasterly of a I ine from the Northeast corner of said Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 to a point on the West 1 ine of said Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 and 450 feet south of the original C.St .P.M. & 0. Ry. right of way also the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4; all in Section 24., Township 299 Range 22, Ramsey Countyq subject to street right -of - way x This property is more commonly described as northwest of Ivy Avenue and Ferndale Street. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as +01 *1 ows: I a The City Council approved the original conditional use permit for this PUD on February 11, 19852 2 is The Maplewood City Council considered the above-re+erenced conditional use permit revision on October 109 1988. NOW, THEREFORE,. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL THAT the above-described conditional use permit revision be approved on the basis of the following findings -o+ -+act: in The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapters$ 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public heal this safety or general welfare. 3a The use would be locatedq designedq maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning districts 1 8 Attachment Four 4 The use would not depreciate property valuess 5 The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land usesq due to the noisesq glare, smok e , dust odor , f umes 9 . water p o l I ut i on . water run -of f . v i brat i on general unsightl iness el ectrical interference or other nuisances Is 6s The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic an I ocal streets and shat I not create traf + is congest ion unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area propertiess 7 The use would be serviced by essential public sere icesq such as streets9 police g fire protection, utilitiesq schools and parks. an The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 910 The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development designs 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1 a The northerly facing roof area for the northwest structure may drain to Jim's Prairieg provided predevelopment runoff levels are not exceeded. All other impervious surface area shall drain away from Jim's Prairies, 2. No herbicides, pesticides or fertilizers shall be applied to any area that drains to the prairie, unless the typeg amount and location are approved by the city. 3w The emergency exit road shall be constructed from the apartment project to Maryland Avenue to support emergency vehicles and the pathway shall be paved from the apartments to the proposed private street in the condominium project prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. A public easement for emergency vehicle access shall. be recorded from the apartment parking lot to Maryland Avenuo, over the proposed path and future private street *in the Beaver Lake condominium project. The emergency vehicle access must be maintained and kept free of obstructions by the respective property owners. 4s Before an occupancy permit is issued, a statement shall be recorded with the property, granting the city the right to . burn Jim's Prairie and maintain the fence along the south boundary of Jim's Prairie that is located approximately five feet into the apartment property. The language of this statement shall be approved by the city. 5a Approval incl odes the site p an enclosed in the January 16, 1985 staf f report Any changes that resul t 'in an increase in density or change in buil ding t'Vpe or site pl an shat I require a publ is hearing and approval by the city councils 6a This approval supersedes the conditions of initial approval granted February 11, 1985. Adopted this day of 1 19880 Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY y SSW CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I the undersigned being the dul y qual if ied and appointed c erk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of 1 1988, with the original on file in my office, and the I I same is a +ul , true and complete transcript insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permit. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1988 a City Cl erk City of Map! ewood 10 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Introduction A c Rejected ected.... MEMORANDUM Pat .City Manager Associate Planner --Johnson HRA/HRC Commissioner Liaison October 59 1988 SUMMARY City Staff is recommending the abandonment of a Council policy that cal I s for one of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) Commissioners also to be a Commissioner on the Human Relations Comm iss ion ( HRC )W Background 1 . The HRA was created in 1975, at the recommendation of the .HRC. Among Council's initial appointees to the HRA ,were commissioners from the planning and the human relations commissions. Although not required by commission bylaws or City code, this liaison function has been maintained since that time.' Each of these commissions is currently sup port ed.by a +ull-ti'me city employees 2. On October 4th the HRC recommended to drop the policy of a liaison commissioner to the HRA. Since 1975, the HRC has been re -organized. It now has less members than it did at that time. It also has acquired the no-fault grievance process which has significantly increased the workload of its commissioners. As such, it has been increasingly difficult to meet the liaison obligations rMMM=n+ = HRA commissioners are appointed to five-year terms. However, since November 1983, the HRA/HRC liaison commissioner has changed four times.. At one point this position was vacant for nearly one year. Quorum problems have resulted. The most recent liaison, John Prey, resigned in late September. Since there is no I anger a need for a nonsta++ I iaison I the pol icy of maintaining a nonsta+f I iaison should be abandoned. Recommendation 1 . Abandon the pol icy of having an appointed commissioner serve as a liaison between the HRA and HRCU I 2. Authorize the HRA and HRC to independently advertise and recommend t.o Council their choice for a commissioners to replace resigned Commissioner Preys MINUTES MAPLEWOOD HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY October 111 1988 1. CALL.. TO ORDER _ Chairman Fisher called the meeting to order at' 7 :05 p.m. 2s ROLL CALL, Commissioners: Dale Carlson Present Thomas Connelly Present Lorraine. F i sc h en -Present ' Greg Schm i t Absent John Prey Absent b UNFINISHED BUSINESS Ex em* t Financing Requirements A. Ta.. - p • n moved and Commissioner, Connell y Comm i ss �, over Carl so .revised seconded to recommend approval. of the • presented in Attachment A. Motion requirements p w carried. -Ayes al 1 . 70 NEW BUS I NESS . A, HRA/HRC Liaison ed and Commissioner Commissioner Carlson moved Connelly, seconded • to recommend approval of the recommendations as presented in the staff reports Motion Carried-- Ayes arried--Ayes all. t AGENDA REPORT Actii0in b -v TO: City Manager FROM: Assist -ant City Engineer SUBJECT: Holloway Avenue, Beebe to Furness, Project 87-14 Schedule Public Hearing Rej � �v �.�,�,. DATE : October 19,; 1988 INTRODUCTION The feasibility study presented at the previous public hearing for this project proposed construction of roadway with utilities in the undeveloped right-of-way between Beebe and Furness together with reconstruction of the existing roadway from Furness to McKnight RoadA The proposed public improvement was denied at the public hearings Subsequent lyq the council. directed the engineering department to evaluate the feasibility of constructing the undeveloped segment from Beebe to Furness only without reconstruction of the existing roadway from Furness to McKnight Road. A supplement,al reportis enclosedwhichreviews the feasibility of this proposal. A resolution is attached which schedules a public hearing. BACKGROUND The supplemental report gives a cost breakdown as to whether or not Ramsey County participates in the funding of the one bl ock segment from Beebe to Furness. From discussions with Ramsey County Publ ic Works Department staff participation in the costs of a one block segment by Ramsey County would not be allowed under the county board's previous decision to participate in the construction and reconstruction from Beebe to McKnight Road. A new decision by the county board would be required to determine if Ramsey County will participate in the one block segment construction proposed. Whether or not Ramsey County participates, then Map lewood's share of street construction and storm sewer costs can be completely financed by MSA funds and assessment to the abutting property within Maplewood at the quasi -standard rate of .$36.50/FF for collector streets on MSA routes. Direct assessment for water main costs is proposed at approximately $46.:60IFFs, RECOMMENDAT I ON It is recommended that a public hearing be schedule as set forth in the attached resolution. is RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of Holloway Avenues Beebe to Furnessis City Project e7-14, by constructi*on of a bituminous roadway with concrete curb and gutter and utilities, and WHEREAS, the said city engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: NOW9 THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,.MINNESOTA 9 as follows: in The report of the city engineer advising this council that the proposed improvement on Holloway Avenue, Beebe to Furness, City Project 87-14, by construction of a bituminous roadway with concrete curb and gutter and utilities is feasible and should best be made as proposedl is hereby receivede 2s The council w i l I consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment o+.bene+ited property for al I or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $229,2908 3w A public hearing will be held in the council chambers of the city hall at 1830 East County Road B I on Monday I the 28th day of November, 1988, at 7:20 p.m. to consider said improvements The city clerk shad I give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. 11.rf ; - M • WNL PPORT 'q by Council Endorsed 10 City Managej,, F*' Fz 0 M C i'l:.y Eng ineer M06 .f1'_e�� SUBJ CT p Lot t p l i t -Appeal-Gall Avenue (MeyeF� � � t.�wM.± 9 �/��![j�: `(`.(����� y� ..M LTi tl1 �i�' (. � h/ `bI 4J W w..G� D A T E S l c t o h r 19 , 1988 Dmoi; e: A. tet p 1 i t. -for 232.6 Ea,,t Count.y Road D was conditional I y approved l�fr-�eve €: by - . n epee her Condition-2 states, .��•� c:y c i tv ent.eri ng i nt.n a contr.-act(s) to construct a storm sewei 't hA- t � -iis property and the properties to ti e e s u " The property. owner , Mr. Norman Meyer, eel e th i s €.ond i-t i.on is excessive and has requested the city c.:.nt..tnc i l con id�l.-Mr el -itrinating the condition. The er'� .neei ink' € a.v . ien cencer�ned with this 1 et sp l i i'['� another~ hrome he incl int. i l t in an area not served 1-{y storm et„4er%r a Within the last +ew months a:r'tother Tot s 1. i t W<x ap p re ved, * ust east o+ Mr. lie :ger , e property. Thie reSU 1 ted in f4IS1 .i. n %---I, i 'l..lw-2�"e:..1 and 1 Softe :w 6..J'ns trt..1ct i w.J: 7 A � 3{1`e o+ thF dr{;i 4 nag..L i..� Rr"'Ela F:;. capacity. to handle storm rurnoff was removed. Mr U Meyer, woul d also haves to f i l l a 1 ow area rKn-:::�: tl ting in a +urther r-edLkCt ion in €brainy-0ge capacity. c on st rUC t i en will result in an intolerable ra i n a-q e problem. Th e en i i t gems i n gi v is i nF � however, Mi..lS-t concern rn rn t.. this point Si n c- e .i. t 4 s i m Q o s F, J. b 1 e t o ro i..! a i ai t i`- y f he S U b t i e w, r3 i”` :. !. n !g o, : h -� ii-1-formal drainage system +€:Jr the areal OL k1- PVal lUc1ti.0#-1 IS nai tura.il 'l y conservative. We do not want to allow dc�v(T-41 opfx-1ent. th -:v,.. May CcRUSe � drainage problem ��nd require the r- ty to in t x.ate :pub 1 i r r.• cr~m ::ewer pr~ei et x It is recommended the c i t,y cosunc.i 1 take no action otril the •_ o t S p 1 j. t. j. P1--) F- I a • 0 WOO1- MAPLI ==J 4 lt Y c�t%yy�0 i ✓� =.s�1- fit 1830 COUNTY ROAD 1 3 MAPLE WOOD, • rA 55109 N a OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 61 Z-.770-- 560 September 30, 1988 Norman and Darlene Meyer 2326 East County Road D ' Maplewood, MN 55109 LOT DIVISION You lot Your l division request*,as illustrated on the enclosed map, has been conditionally approved. Approval is subject to: 1. Submittal of a quit -claim deed to the city engineer for approval of the legal description and recording of the deed with the county, to convey an easement over the south 36 feet of this property to the city for street and utility purposes. (The south 3.5 feet ,of -this property may already be subject to the referenced easement.) The qui.t-�-claim deed should reference the description of the property before the lot division. 2. The city entering into a contract(s) to construct a storm sewer that, at a minimum,.will serve this property and the properties to the east. (Please contact the city engineer, Ken Haider, at 770-4550 for more i nformati Qn.) 3. All deeds associated with this request must be recorded within six months of the city approval 's a roval of the storm sewer project or this approval shall become null .. and void. , g Once Conditions One through Three have been satisfied, you may submit the deed(s) to me for endorsement and then have it recorded with Ramsey County. Proof of a recorded deed for Parcel Two' must be submitted with a building. permit application, if construction is proposed within the next years e that a uti l*i t easement exists for the east ten'(10) (10) feet of the vacated Tease not y alley right—of—way. It would be appreciated if you would communicate this to any perspective buyers, to -insure that their house plans will be compatible with the P y available lot width. Also, with regard to your land survey, our records show that the south 36 feet of ' the vacated alley right-of-way was retained for Gall Avenue. This wa ri ht -of - does not appear on your survey. Finally, please be advised that right-of-way a letter of credit-may'be required to guarantee that the street will be properly patched when the connection to sanitary sewer is made. This letter of credit would be required as part of the building permit. Norman and Darlene Meyer Page 2 September 30, 1988 If you have 'any 'questi ons, please contact me at 770-4560. If you ' wi sh to appeal any of the conditions of approval to the city council, you must subject a letter outlining why the city council should consider your request.. Your letter must be received within te.n days of the date of this letter. �- RANDALL JOHNSON AICP — ASSOCIATE PLANNER mb Enclosures l Norman and Darlene Meyer Page 2 September 30, 1988 If you have 'any 'questi ons, please contact me at 770-4560. If you ' wi sh to appeal any of the conditions of approval to the city council, you must subject a letter outlining why the city council should consider your request.. Your letter must be received within te.n days of the date of this letter. �- RANDALL JOHNSON AICP — ASSOCIATE PLANNER mb Enclosures ---—.[Z-----�G PROPERTYLIO'OE,/ ZONING MAP 2636.: 'BAST BF 07- Css� 2 � 3 W p