Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1984 12-10 City Council Packet
MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, October 22, 1984 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 84 -23 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present MaryLee Maids, Councilmember Present Michael T. Wasiluk, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended 1. Liquor License 2. No Smoking Rules in Public Buildings 3. Phalen Place Street 4. Sterling Glen 5. Appendix E 6. Frost Avenue and Walter Street 7. Reconsideration 8. Senior Home Share 9. No Parking 10. Storm Water Separation Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Anderson moved, seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk, Ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda as recommended 1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses, Check register dated October 10, 1984, through October 12, 1984, $384,104.66: Part TI - Payroll dated October 5, 1984 - $60,680,35) in the amount of $444,785.01. 2. Election Judges Resolution 84 - 10 - 153 - 1 - 10122 RESOLVED, that the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, accepts the following list of Election Judges for the 1984 General Election, Tuesday, November 6, 1984: Precinct #1 Precinct #7 Eleanor Mathews Margaret Wolszon Lorraine Schneider Myrtle Malm Florence Stella Betty Haas Agnes Allen Esther Dollerschel Idamae Biebighauser Arnella Podgorski Helen Jean Dickson Sharon Giel Precinct #2 Precinct #8 Pat Thompson Jean Myers Evelyn Axdahl Betty Berglund Kathleen Dittel Lorraine Fischer Bea Hendricks Rita Frederickson Karen Burton Mildred Houck Marilyn Cunningham Anna Fox Precinct #3 Precinct #9 Barb Leiter Mary Johnson Doris Broady Delores Mallet Yvonne Bell Margaret McDonald Alice Miller Paul Arbuckle Irene Anderson Katherine Moore " `Charlene Arbuckle Theodore Haas Precinct #4 Precinct #10 Caroline Warner Anne Fosburgh Joyce Lipinski Mary Lou Lieder Marjory Tooley Dorothy Arbore Betty Eddy Pat Werden Jack Arbuckle Diane Golaski Charlene Knutson Precinct #5 Precinct #11 Elsie Wiegert Delores Lofgren Emma Klebe Maxine Olson Sibbie Sandquist Shirley Luttrell Phyllis Erickson Karen Boget- Abrahamson Joyce Schmidt Sigrid Hart Lynette Leonard Joan Cottrell Precinct #6 Precinct #12 Kathy Supan Mary Libhardt Gmborg Mowchan Audrey Duellman Sandy Jones Deloris Fastner Linda Prigge Mildred Dhen Joanne Houghton Orpha Getty Judy Widholm - 2 - 10122 3. Budget Transfer (Community Services) Approved a budget transfer of $7,700.00 from Account No. 01 =4020- 208 -63 to Account No. 01- 4480- 208 -63 to allow North East Soccer Association to issue checks to pay soccer officials. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7`.00 P.M., Code Amendment: M -1 District a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding changes to the M -1 District of the Maplewood Zoning Code. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Geoff Olson presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Barrett moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the proposed ordinance to amend the M -1 District as proposed by staff with the addition to (1) (10) to in- clude the word 'poultry'. Commissioner Sigmundik seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Fischer, Larson, Pellish, Sigmundik, Whitcomb." d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Bastian moved first reading of an ordinance amending Section 36 permitted uses in M -1 Light Manufacturing District. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Wasiluk Nay - Councilmember Maids. 2. 7:00 P.M., Conditional Use Permit: White Bear Avenue (Ramsey County) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Ramsey County for a conditional use permit to construct a two -story office/ maintenance shop building to be located on the Ramsey County Fair Grounds. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Geoff Olson presented the Planning Commission recommendation. d. Larry Holmberg, Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department, spoke on behalf of the proposal. - 3 - 10/22 e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f, Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 - 10 - 154 WHEREAS, the Ramsey County Department of Parks and Recreation initiated a conditional use permit for a conditional use permit for an office /main- tenance shop facility at the following - described property: Subj. to White Bear Avenue and a pipeline esmt. and subj. to Van Dyke St. and ex the S 235.8 ft. and ex the N 52 ft, of the S 287.8 off the W 160.5 ft. and ex the W 270 ft. lying N of the S 700 ft, that part S of the Mpls -St. Paul and S St. Marie RR R/W of the W 870 ft. of the S 1/2 of the N 1/4 in Sec. 14, T 29, R. 22. This property is also known as the Ramsey County Fair Grounds, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use.permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by Ramsey County, pur- suant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on October 1, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on October 22, 1984. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described conditional use permit be approved and the one -year review be waived, on the basis of the following findings -of -fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detri- mental to the public health; safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4, The use would not depreciate property values, - 4 - 10/22 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal.veglicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or park- ing needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detri- mental to the welfare of the city. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 11. The use is surrounded by county land and would have no significant effect on adjacent properties. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. .Byes - all. 3. 7:20 P.M., Rezoning - County Road B and McMenemy a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the rezoning of Lot 5 and 6, Block 36, Dawson Suburban Acres from B -C (Business - Commercial) to R -1 Single dwelling district. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Mr. Sheldon Caswell, attorney representing the owner of the property, Mrs. Alice Londin stated Mrs. Londin had passed away this morning and would request Council delay action until he had a chance to review the situation. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents e f g Mary E. Olson, 365 E. County Road B Tony Phillippi, 380 E. County Road B Elizabeth Olson, 2137 McMenemy Road Harry Koval, 2191 Arkwright Don Bother, 2184 Arkwright The following were heard: Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard.. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. Councilmember Anderson introduced the adoption resolution and moved its - 5 - 10/22 84 - 10 - 155 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business commercial and F. farm residence to R -1, residence district (single dwelling) for the following - .described property: Lots 4 - 6, block 36, Dawson's Suburban Acre Lots and block one, Londin Homesites WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on October 15, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on October 22, 1984, to consider this rezoning, Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an oppor- tunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also con - oidered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the Following findings of fact: t The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code and comprehensive plan, because it would strengthen the existing single - dwelling residential character of the neighborhood. 2. The proposed use would not detract from the use of neighboring properties. 3. It would be in the public interest to plan for the conversion of the office building property to single dwelling property. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. 5. The proposed zoning would not be overly restrictive for the office building site, because it can be divided into two single - dwelling lots very similar in size to several nearby lots. 6. The neighborhood commercial zone is not recommended, because it would allow a substantial nonresidential expansion of the use of this site. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 4. 7:40 P.M„ Rezoning, White Bear Avenue (Skippers) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Skippers Inc. to rezone the property located on White Bear Avenue - 6 - 10122 south of Chesters Restaurant from F -Farm Residence to BC - Business Commercial for - the purpose of constructing a restaurant. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Mr. Herb Boeckerman representing Skippers, spoke on behalf of the proposal. d. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following expressed their views: The owner of the property at Chesters, 3088 White Bear Avenue. Mr, Bob Hajicek, 1701 E. Co. Road D. e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. f, Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 - 10 - 156 WHEREAS, Herb Boeckerman initiated a rezoning from F, farm residence to BC, business commercial to for the following - described property: That part of the following described parcel lying westerly of the easterly 114.15 feet thereof: That part of the North 10 acres of the East 20 acres of the North half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the easterly of the easterly right -of -way line of White Bear Avenue and the North line of the South 100,0 feet of said 10 acres; thence easterly along said North line of the South 100 feet a distance of 309.40 feet; thence northerly at a right angle 155094 feet to a point of the parallel with and distant 493050 feet South of the North line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 2; thence westerly along said parallel line 306.82 feet to the easterly right -of -way line of White Bear Avenue; thence southerly along said right -of -way line to the point of beginning. Subject to an easement in favor of Northern States Power Company and an easement'in favor of the American Oil Company. Containing 0.70 acres more or less. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by Herb Boeckerman, Skipper's, Inc., pursuant to Chapter 36 Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2, This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on October 1, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be 3, The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on October 22, 1984 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present writted statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the - 7 - 10/22 above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code and the land use plan. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring p rmperty or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare, 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Approval is subject to the applicant submitting written permission from NSP and Standard Oil to build within their easements. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk, Ayes - all. 5. 7:5- P.M., Rezoning: 1800 Edgerton (Forest Lawn Cemetery) a, Mayor Greavu convend the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposal to rezone 1800 Edgerton Street (Forest Lawn Cemetery)from BC, Business Commercial to F. Farm Residence, b, Manager Evans presented the staff report. c, Chairman Les Axdahl presented the Planning Commission recommendation, d, Mayor Greavu called for porponents. None were heard, e, Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard, f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing, g. Councilmember Maida introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 - 10 - 157 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business commercial to F, farm residence for the following- described properties: That part of the Forest Cemetery Rearrangement of plat B, lying north of the Soo Line railroad right -of -way, within the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 17, Township 29, Range 22; and That part of the N 112 of the Soo Line railroad right -of -way lying east of the center line of Edgerton Street and west of the northerly extension of the east line of lot 22, block 1, Ufton Grove Second Plat, - 8 -, 10122 WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36 Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2, This rezoning was reviewd by the Maplewood Planning Commission on October 1, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on October 22, 1984 to consider this rezoning, Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present writted statements, The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change in consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substatially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the peoperty adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare, 4, The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian, Ayes - all, G. AWARD OF BIDS 1, Used Vehicles a, Manager Evans presented the staff report. b, Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 -10 -158 WHEREAS, a number of City Vehicles have been determined surplus, bids were received October 12, 1984 at 3:30 P.M. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the surplus vehicles be sold to the highest bid as follows: - 9 - 10/22 Vehicle. High Bid 2nd High 3rd High 82 Ford Ltd 1,251.00 1,016.45 520.00 82 Ford Ltd 1,566080 1,300.00 1,001.00 82 Ford Ltd 1,901.01 1,723-50 1,511.00 82 Ford Ltd 1,341090 1,001.00 620.00 Seconded by Councilmember Maids, Ayes - all. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Letter from Ralph McGinley (Advance Circuits) - a. Manager Evans stated Advance Circuits, Inc. was requesting the City withdraw the requirement of the $20,000.00 payment for the allocation regarding the $3.6 million industrial revenue bond, b. Councilmember Bastian moved to accept the letter from Mr. Ralph McGinley and to take no action on the request. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 2. T. H. 120 and 3M Road Signals a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 -10 -159 RESOLVED, that the plans for T. H. 120 and 3M Road System are hereby approved. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson and Wasiluk. Nays - Councilmembers Bastian and Maida. 3. Beaver Lake Drainage Study a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and m its adoption 84 10 - 160 is WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of the North Beaver Lake drainage area by construction of storm sewer and sanitary sewer systems, and WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: - 10 - 10/22 I.. The report of the City Engineer advising this Council that the proposed improvement on the North Beaver Lake drainage area by implementation of a storm drainage system plan is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to M.S.A. Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $650,000.00. 3. A public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1380 Frost Avenue on Monday, the 26th day of November, 1984, at, 7 p.m. to consider said improvement. The City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Maida, and Wasiluk. Nays - Councilmember Bastian. J. VISITOR PRESENTATION None. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATION 1. Liquor License. a. Councilmember Wasiluk commented on the requirement to sell Low Alcohol Beer in On Sale Liquor Establishments. b. Staff answered questions from the Council. 2. Smoking in public buildings. a. Councilmember Wasiluk questioned the procedures in keeping smoking segregated. b. Staff will investigate. 3. Phalen Place- Frost Avenue and Walter Street a. Councilmember Wasiluk commented on the need for improvements. b. Director of Public Works, Ken Haider, explained the specifics of the proposal. c. Councilmember Anderson introduced the fo resolution and moved its adoption 84 _ 10 - 161 WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is necessary and expedient that the area described as Walter Steet from Frost Avenue to Fenton Avenue be improved by construction of streets, storm sewer, watermain's and all necessary appurtenances NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, - 11 - 10/22 that the improvement as hereinbefore described is hereby referred to the City Engineer, and he is instructed to..report to the Council with..;, all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and should best be made as proposed, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. 4. Sterling Glen Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers, Anderson, Maida and Wasiluk. Nay - Councilmember Bastian. a. Councilmember Maida moved to reconsider Council action of October 8th 1984, concerning Sterling Glen Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Maida and Wasiluk. Nay - Councilmember Bastian. 5. Appendix E a. Councilmember Maida moved to reconsider Council's Action of October 8th 1984, regarding Appendix E Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - Councilmembers Bastian, Maida, and Wasiluk. Nays - Mayor Greavu, Councilmember Anderson. 6. Frost Avenue and Walter Street Discussed K -3o 7. Reconsideration Discussed K -4 and 5 8. Senior Home Share Program a. Councilmember Bastian stated that on November 2, 1984 at 3:00 P.m., 1902 E. County Road B, there will be a meeting concerning the Senior Home Share Program. 9. No parking a. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 -10 -162 RESOLVED, that Ramsey County is requested to designate the South side of Frost Avenue from Ide Street to Birmingham Street "NO PARKING." Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. loo Position Paper - Suburban Storm Water Separation a. Mayor Greavu commented on a position paper from St. Paul regarding the suburban areas storm water separation. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATION - 12 - 10/22 1. St. Paul Business Center - Final Approval I.D.R. a. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 84 - 10 - 163 RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, as follows: ARTICLE ONE DEFINITIONS, LEGAL AUTHORIZATION AND FINDINGS 1 -1. Definitions. The terms used herein, unless the context hereof shall require otherwise shall have the following meanings, and any other terms defined in the Loan Agreement shall have the same meanings when used herein as assigned to them in the Loan Agreement unless the context or use thereof indicates another or different meaning or intent. Act the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, as amended; Assignment of Rents and Leases the agreement to be executed by the Borrower assigning all the rents, issues and profits derived from the Project to the Lender to secure the repayment of the Note and interest thereon; Bond Counsel the firm of Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, of St. Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota, or any other firm of nationally recognized bond counsel, and any opinion of Bond Counsel shall be a written opinion signed by such Bond Counsel; Borrower St. Paul Business Center East, a Minnesota limited partnership, its successors, assigns, and any surviving, resulting or transferee business entity which may assume its obligations under the Loan Agreement; City the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, its successors and assigns; Construction Fund the fund established by the City pursuant to this Resolution and into the Construction Fund the proceeds of the Note will be deposited; Disbursing Agreement the agreement to be executed by the City, the Borrower and the Lender, relating to the disbursement and payment of Project Costs for the construction and installation of the Project; Guarantors collectively, William S. Reiling and Donald Bachmeier; - 13 - 10/22 Guaranty the guaranty of the payment of, among other things, the principal of and interest on the Note to be executed by the Guarantors as of the date of this Agreement; Improvements the structures and other improvements, including any tangible personal property, to be constructed or installed by the Borrower on the Land in accordance with the Plans and Specifications; Land the real property and any other easements and rights described in Exhibit A attached to the Loan Agreement; Leases leases of space in the Project between the Borrower and various tenants, including any amendment thereof or supplement thereto, entered into in accordance with the provisions thereof; Lender First National Bank of Minneapolis, in Minneapolis, Minnesota, its successors and assigns; Loan Agreement the agreement to be executed by the City and the Borrower, providing for the issuance of the Note and the loan of the proceeds thereof to the Borrower, including any amendments or supplements thereto made in accordance with its provisions; Mortgage the Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Financing Statement between the Borrower as mortgagor, to the Lender, as mortgagee, securing payment of the Note and interest thereon including any mortgage supplemental thereto entered into in accordance with the provisions thereof; Note the $3,900,000 Commercial Development Revenue Note of 1984, (St. Paul Business Center East Project) to be issued by the City pursuant to this Resolution; Note Register the records kept by the City Clerk to provide for the registration of transfer of ownership of the Note; Plans and Specifications the plans and specifications for the construction and installation of the Improvements on the Land, which are approved by the Lender, together with such modifications thereof and additions thereto as are reasonably determined by the Borrower to be necessary or desirable for the completion of the Improvements and are approved by the Lender; Pledge Agreement the agreement to be executed by the City and the Lender pled}ng and assigning the Loan Agreement to the Lender; Principal Balance so much of the principal sum on the Note as remains unpaid at any time; Project the Land and Improvements as they may at any time exist; Project Costs the total of all "Construction Costs" and "Loan and Carrying Charges," as those terms are defined in the Loan Agreement; - 14 - 10/22 Resolution this Resolution of the City adopted October 22, 1984, authorizing the issuance of the Note, together with any supplement or amendment thereto. All references in this instrument to designated "Articles," "Sections" and other subdivisions are to the desig- nated Articles, Sections and subdivisions of this resolution as originally adopted. The words "herein," "hereof" and "hereund- er" and other words of similar import refer to this Resolution as a whole not to any particular Article, Section or subdivis- ion. 1 -2. Legal Authorization The City is a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota and is authorized under the Act to initiate the revenue producing project herein referred to, and to issue and sell the Note for the purpose, in the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Act and in this Resolution. 1 -3. Findings The City Council has heretofore determined, and does hereby determine, as follows: (1) The City is authorized by the Act to enter into a Loan Agreement for the public purposes expressed in the Act; (2) The City has made the necessary arrangements with the Borrower for the establishment within the City of a Project consisting of certain property all as more fully described in the Loan Agreement and which will be of the character and accomplish the purposes provided by the Act, and the City has by this Resolution authorized the Project and the execution of the Loan Agreement, the Pledge Agreement, the Note and the Disbursing Agreement, which documents specify certain terms and conditions of the acquisition and financing the Improvements to be included in the Project; (3) in authorizing the Project the City's purpose is, and- in its judgment the effect thereof will be, to promote the public welfare by: the attraction, encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce so as to prevent, so far as possible, the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; the develop- ment of revenue - producing enterprises to use the available resources of the community, in order to retain the benefit of the community's existing investment in educational and public service facilities;,the »halting of the movement of talented, educated personnel of all ages to other areas thus preserving the economic and human resources needed as a base for providing governmental services and facilities; the provision of acces- sible employment opportunities for residents in the area; the expansion of an adequate tax base to finance the cost of governmental services, including educational services for the school district serving the community in which the Project is situated; - 15 - 10/22 (4) the amount estimated to be necessary to partially finance the Project Costs, including the costs and estimated costs permitted by Section 474.05 of the Act, will require the issuance of the Note in the aggregate principal amount of $3,900,000 as hereinafter provided; (5) it is desirable, feasible and consistent with the objects and purposes of the Act to issue the Note, for the purpose of financing the Project; (6) the Note and the interest accruing thereon do not constitute an indebtedness of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation and do not consti- tute or give rise to a pecuniary liability or a charge against the general credit or taxing powers of the City and neither the full faith and credit nor the taxing powers of the City are pledged for the payment of the Note or interest thereon; and (7) the Note is an industrial development bond within the meaning of Section 103(b) of the Internal Revenue Code and is to be issued within the exemption provided under subparagraph (D) of Section 103(b)(6) of the Code with respect to an issue of $10,000,000 or less, provided that nothing herein shall prevent the City from hereafter qualifying the Note under a different exemption if, and to the extent, such exemption is permitted by law and consistent with the objects and purposes of tM Project. 1 -4. Authorization and Ratification of Project. The City has heretofore and does hereby authorize the Borrower, in accordance with the provisions of Section 474.03(7) of the Act and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Disbursing Agreement, to provide for the acquisition, construction and installation of the Project by such means as shall be available to the Borrower and in the manner determined by the Borrower, and without advertisement for bids as may be required for the construction and acquisi- tion of municipal facilities; and the City hereby ratifies, affirms, and approves all actions heretofore taken by the Borrower consistent with and in anticipation of such authority and in compliance with the Plans and Specifications. ARTICLE TWO NOTE 2 -1. Authorized Amount and Form of Note The Note issued pursuant to this Resolution shall be in substantially the form set forth herein, with such appropri- ate variations, omissions and insertions as are permitted or required by this Resolution, and in accordance with the further provisions hereof; and the total principal amount of the Note that may be outstanding hereunder is expressly limited to $3,900,000. The Note shall be in substantially the following form: - 16 - 10/22 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Commercial Development Revenue Note of 1984 (St. Paul Business Center East Project) $3,900,000 FOR VALUE RECEIVED the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, Ramsey County, Minnesota (the "City "), hereby promises to pay the FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS (the "Lender "), its succes- sors or registered assigns (the Lender and any such successor or registered assignee being also sometimes hereinafter referred to as the "Holder "), from the source and in the manner hereinafter provided, the principal sum of THREE MILLION NINE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($3,900,000) or so much thereof as remains unpaid from time to time (the "Principal Balance "), with interest thereon at the rates specified in paragraph 1(a) hereof (the "Tax Exempt Rates ") or at such higher rate as provided in paragraph 1(c) hereof (the "Taxable Rate "), in any coin or currency which at the time or times of payment is legal tender for the payment of public or private debts in the United States of America, in accordance with the terms hereinafter set forth. 1. (a) From and after the date hereof through and including July 31, 1995, interest shall be paid at the rate of ll� % per annum. On the date hereof, the City shall pay as and for additional interest for the period from the date hereof through September 30, 1985 the sum of $78,000. For the period from August 1 in each of years 1995, 2000, 2005 and 2010 (the "Adjustment Dates "), through July 31 immediately preceeding the next subsequent Adjustment Date, or in the case of interest from August 1, 2010 to October 1, 2014 (the "Final Maturity Date "), interest shall accrue at an annual rate which will in the written opinion of the Lender (or successor Holder) delivered to the City within one week of the Adjustment Date, allow the Note to be marketed on the Adjustment Date at par subject to the limitation that such annual rate shall be not less than 115% nor more than 135% of the yield to maturity stated in the "25 Rev. Bonds Index" appearing in the Credit Markets (or successor publication) for the last week immediately preceeding the Adjustment Date. (b) Interest only shall be payable on the Principal Balance on the first day of the calendar month next -17 - 10122 succeeding the date hereof and on the first day of each succeeding month thereafter through and including October 1, 1988. Commencing November 1, 1988 and on the first day of each calendar month thereafter, the Principal Balance and interest accrued thereon shall be paid in equal monthly installments in the amount necessary to fully amortize the Principal Balance over the period remaining before the Final Maturity Date. The amount of the monthly installments due hereunder shall be increased or decreased on each Adjustment Date to reflect any adjustment to the rate of interest borne by this Note pursuant to the terms hereof and by prepayments of principal previously made. All payments shall be applied first to accrued interest and thereafter to reduction of the Principal Balance. (c)(i) In the event that the interest on this Note shall become subject to federal income taxation pursuant to a Determination of Taxability (as hereinafter defined), the interest rate on this Note shall be increased, retroactively effective from and after the Date of Taxability (as hereinafter defined) to 16% (the "Taxable Rate "), provided, however, that in no event shall the Taxable Rate for any period be less than the Tax Exempt Rate otherwise in effect for the same period. The City shall immediately upon demand pay to the Holder and to each prior Holder affected by such Determination of Taxability an amount equal to the amount by which the interest accrued retroactively at such increased rate from the Date of Taxability to the date of payment exceeds the amount of interest actually accrued and paid to the Holder and any such prior Holder during said period. Such obligation of the City shall survive the payment in full of the principal amount of this Note. Commencing on the payment date next following the notice of taxability and continuing on each payment date there- after (unless the Holder shall accelerate the maturity of the Note pursuant to clause (ii) of this paragraph (c)), this Note shall be payable as follows: (A) if amortization of the Principal Balance had not theretofore commenced, the monthly payments of interest only under paragraph (b) shall be increased to reflect the accrual of interest at the Taxable Rate and the monthly installments of principal and interest payable commencing with the November 1, 1986 payment shall be recomputed on the basis of the Taxable Rate in affect from time to time so that the unpaid principal and interest shall be amortized over the period remaining before the Final Maturity Date; or - 18 10122 (B) if amortization of the Principal Balance had theretofore commenced, the monthly installments of principal and interest payable commencing with the next succeeding payment shall be recomputed on the basis of the Taxable Rate in effect from time to time so that unpaid principal and interest shall be amortized over the period remaining before the Final Maturity of the Note. (ii) Upon a Determination of Taxability, the Holder may declare the entire Principal Balance of this Note together with accrued interest thereon at such retroactively increased Taxable Rate to be immediately due and payable, but without the prepayment premium, if any, specified in paragraph 8 hereof. (iii) The Holder shall give notice, as soon as practicable, to the Borrower of any Notice of Taxability, as hereinafter defined, received by the Holder and permit the Borrower to contest, litigate or appeal the same at its sole expense. In the event any such contest, litigation or appeal is undertaken, the increased interest provided in paragraph (c)(i) shall, nevertheless, be payable to the Holder and shall be held by the Holder in escrow (without paying interest thereon) pending final disposition of such contest, litigation or appeal, provided that the Borrower shall indemnify and hold harmless the Holder and each prior Holder from any and all penalties, interest or other liabilities which they may incur on account of such contest, litigation or appeal. (iv) The terms "Determination of Taxability," "Date of Taxability" and "Notice of Taxability" shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Loan Agreement, dated the date hereof (the "Loan Agreement "), between the City and St. Paul Business Center East (the "Borrower "). 2. In any event, the payments hereunder shall be sufficient to pay all principal and interest due, as such principal and interest becomes due, and to pay any premium or penalty, at maturity, upon redemption, or otherwise. Interest shall be computed on the basis of a 360 day year, but charged for the actual number of days principal is unpaid. 3. Principal and interest and any premium due hereunder shall be payable at the principal office of the Lender, or at such other place as the Holder may designate in writing. 4. This Note is issued by the City to finance the acquisition and completion of a Project, as defined in Section 474.02, Subdivisions la, Minnesota Statutes, consisting of the - 19 - 10/22 acquisition of land and the construction and installation thereon of an office complex containing office /warehouse space, pursuant to the Loan Agreement, and this Note is further issued pursuant to and in full compliance with the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, particularly Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, and pursuant to a resolution of the City Council duly adopted on October 22, 1984 (the "Resolution "). 5. This Note is secured by a Pledge Agreement of even date herewith by the City to the Lender (the "Pledge Agreement "), a Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Financing Statement of even date herewith among the Borrower as mortgagor, and the Lender as mortgagee (the "Mortgage "), and an Assignment of Rents and Leases, of even date herewith, from the Borrower to the Lender (the "Assignment of Rents and Leases "). The proceeds of this Note shall be placed in the Construction Fund established pursuant to the Resolution and the Disbursing Agreement (hereinafter referred to) and disbursement of the proceeds of this Note from the Construction Fund is subject to the terms and conditions of a Disbursing Agreement of even date herewith among the Lender, the City, the Borrower and Title Insurance Company of Minnesota (the "Disbursing Agreement "). 6. The Holder may extend the times of payments of interest and /or principal of or any penalty or premium due on this Note, including the date of the Final Maturity Date, to the extent permitted by law, without notice to or consent of any party liable hereon and without releasing any such party. However, in no event may the Final Maturity Date be extended beyond thirty (30) years from the date hereof. 7. The Borrower may prepay the Principal Balance in whole or if in part in increments of $100,000 on any payment date upon at least 30 days advance written notice to the Holder (or such lesser period of notice as the Holder may approve) and upon payment of an amount equal to the principal amount being so prepaid, plus accrued interest hereon to the date of prepayment, plus the prepayment premium calculated in accordance with paragraph 8 hereof. This Note is also subject to mandatory prepayment in whole or in part pursuant to Section 2.05 of the Disbursing Agreement in the amount of any suns remaining in the Construction Fund at the Completion Date (as such terms are defined in the Disbursing Agreement), in which event a prepayment premium shall also be payable in accordance with paragraph 8 hereof, and the time of such prepayment may not be extended pursuant to paragraph 6 hereof. Upon the occurrence of certain "Events of Default" under the Loan Agreement and /or under the Mortgage, and as provided in paragraph 12 hereof, the Holder may declare the Principal - 20 - 10/22 Balance and accrued interest on this Note to be immediately due and payable (any such action and any similar action pursuant to paragraph l(c)(ii) hereof being hereinafter referred to as an "acceleration" of this Note), in which event, except for an acceleration pursuant to paragraph 1(c)(ii) a prepayment premium shall also be payable in accordance with paragraph 8 hereof. Upon the occurrence of certain events of damage, destruction or condemnation, the Holder may, as provided in the Mortgage, apply the net proceeds of any insurance or condem- nation award to the prepayment, in whole or in part, of the Principal Balance in which event a prepayment premium shall be payable if an Event of Default had occurred under the Loan Agreement or the Mortgage and remains uncured at the time such prepayment is made. This Note may be called for redemption and prepay- ment, in whole, on each Adjustment Date (or at any time within the six months period following each Adjustment Date) at the option of the Holder, upon at least thirty (30) days' advance written notice to the Borrower (or such lesser period of notice as the Borrower may approve). 8. (a) This Note maybe prepaid in whole, but not in part, on each Adjustment Date without a penalty or premium. (b) At the time of any prepayment or acceleration of this Note and where there is a payment of a premium required by the provisions of this Note, the Borrower shall pay, together with the premium, if any, set forth in paragraph (c) hereof, an amount equal to 1 -1/2% of the amount of principal so prepaid. (c) At the time of any prepayment or acceleration of this Note and where there is payment of a premium required by the provisions of this Note and the yield on U.S. Treasury securities (as published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York) having a maturity date closest to the next Adjustment Date (the "Government Yield "), as determined by the Holder as of the date of prepayment or acceleration, is less than two and one -half percent in excess of the interest rate then payable hereon, the Borrower shall pay a premium calculated as follows: (a) The amount of principal so prepaid shall be multiplied by (i) the amount by which the stun of two and one -half percent plus the interest rate then payable hereon exceeds the Government Yield as of the date of prepayment or acceleration, times (ii) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days remaining to the next Adjustment Date and - 21 10/22 the denominator of which is 360. (b) The resulting product shall then be divided by the number of whole months then remaining to the next Adjustment Date, yielding a quotient (the "Quotient "). (c) The amount of the prepayment premium payable under this paragraph shall be the present value on the date of prepayment or acceleration (using the Government Yield as of the date of prepayment or acceleration as the discount factor) of a stream of equal monthly payments in number equal to the number of whole months remaining to the next Adjustment Date, with the amount of each such hypothetical monthly payment equal to the Quotient and with the first payment payable on the date of prepayment or acceleration Notwithstanding the foregoing, no such prepayment premium shall be payable with respect to a prepayment made at the option of the Holder pursuant to Article Five of the Mortgage or Section 5.02 of the Loan Agreement unless an Event of Default had occurred under the Loan Agreement or the Mortgage and remains uncured at the time such prepayment is made. 9. The payments due under paragraph 1 hereof shall continue to be due and payable in full until the entire , Principal Balance and accrued interest due on this Note have been paid regardless of any partialrprepayment made hereunder. 10. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Note is transfer- able upon the books of the City at the office of the City Manager by the Holder in person or by his agent duly authorized in writing, at the Holder's expense, upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the City Clerk duly executed by the Holder or his duly authorized agent. Upon such transfer the City Clerk will note the date of registration and the name and address of the new registered Holder in the registration blank appearing below. The City may deem and treat the person in whose name the Note is last registered upon the books of the City with such registration noted on the Note, as the absolute owner hereof, whether or not overdue, for the purpose of receiving payment of or on the account of the Principal Balance, redemption price or interest and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to the Holder or upon his order shall be valid and effective to satisfy and discharge the liability upon the Note to the extent of the sum or sums so paid, and the City shall not be affected by any notice to the contrary. 11. This Note and interest hereon and any premium due hereunder are payable solely from the revenues and proceeds under the Loan Agreement pledged to the payment thereof pursuant to the'Pledge Agreement, except as the same may otherwise be payable in accordance with the Mortgage and the Assignment of Rents and Leases, and do not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory - 22 -; 10/22 limitation, are not payable from or a charge upon any funds other than the revenues and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, and do not give rise to a pecuniary liability of the City or, to the extent permitted by law, of any of its offi- cers, agents or employees, and no holder of this Note shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay this Note or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City, and this Note does not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City, and the agreement of the City to perform or cause the performance of the covenants and other provisions herein referred to shall be subject at all times to the availability of revenues or other funds furnished for such purpose in accordance with the Loan Agreement, sufficient to pay all costs of such performance or the enforcement thereof. 12. It is agreed that time is of the essence of this Note. If the City defaults in the payment when due of any installment of principal or interest or any premium or penalty due hereunder and if said default shall have continued for a period of ten (10) days, or if an Event of Default shall occur as set forth in the Mortgage, the Disbursing Agreement or the Loan Agreement, then the Holder shall have the right and option to declare the Principal Balance, and accrued interest thereon, together with the premium specified in paragraph 8 hereof, immediately due and payable but solely from the sources specified in paragraph 11 hereof. Failure to exercise such option at any time shall not constitute a waiver of the right to exercise the same at any subsequent time. 13. The remedies of the Holder, as provided herein and in the Mortgage, the Assignment of Rents and Leases, the Loan Agreement and the Disbursing Agreement, are not exclusive and shall be cumulative and concurrent and may be pursued singly, successively or together, at the sole discretion of the Holder, and may be exercised as often as occasion therefor shall occur; and the failure to exercise any such right or remedy shall in no event be construed as a waiver or release thereof. 14. The Holder shall not be deemed, by any act of omission or commission, to have waived any of its rights or remedies hereunder unless such waiver is in writing and signed by the Holder, and then only to the extent specifically set forth in the writing. A waiver with reference to one event shall not be construed as continuing or as a bar to or waiver of any right or remedy as to a subsequent event. 15. This Note shall convert to a non - recourse obligation of the City and the Borrower upon the terms and conditions contained in the Loan Agreement. - 23 - 10122 IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all condi- tions, acts and things required to exist, happen and be perform- ed precedent to or in the issuance of this Note do exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due form as required by law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Note to be duly executed in its name by the manual signatures of the Mayor and City Clerk, and has caused the corporate seal to be affixed hereto, and has caused this Note to be dated October , 1984. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. M. AJOURNMENT 9:00 P. M. City Clerk - 24 - 10/22 j I is - . .. - ... MANU .. +.. L`.i% �- - r'1MPwr.�Yi :. J': C.ai •_ ` CH NOVEMBER ... w...J:.r.r ' tom►: +.J V. r•.. r . wrwb r:fr._....- n... r.w.. w.lr 1984 w ...... .. - �.. . _. ..... .. • ... . A: 1984 CITY 3F MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR. ITEM DESCRIPTION 321M69 12/U3/84 5,793.54 MTNN ST +4T_ TREAS DRIVE-R5 LTC POL 321 1069 12 /J .3/ 84 243.'' 0 MINN STIAT= TREAS DR V RS LiC PBL 6.36.54 " 324A:v5 12/03/84 342.15 AFSCiE UN M-N DUES ?BL " 324AJ -5 12/03/84 5.32 AF.SC4!7 UNION DUES PSL 347.47 + ' U405 12/:'3184 14,834.54 C!TV CRr.DTT UNION CRE UNION PBL 1 14034.50 324I15 12/33/F4 2.532.72 ICMA flEFE. CO MP 324115 12/03/84 505., ICMA 3E: ERRED COMP 3,038.46 324M35 12/03/84 288.75 my 8m=IT ASS3C :NSURANCr 2 88.7 5 324M52 12/C3/84 14 M*4 F.3 RAL SAVINGS FWT PBL 3Z4M52 12/03/84 337.53 M4 F 3CtRA_ SAVINGS SAVINGS BONDS 14. 7.35 . D4 324M61 12/03/84 313. 3 MN MJTJ4L LIFE INSURANCE 310 o'! 0 + - 3241065 12/33/84 7,8320 Mai ST C3M41REVENUE SWT ?3L 7 3241068 12/03/84 15.77 My St R�_TTZEMft. t- COMP DEFERRED 324M68 12/03184 9.23 MN ST RETIREMENT DEFERRED COMP 25.0 0 324"69 12/33/84 59837.30 MTN% STOAT: TREAS D LTC =BL 32410169 12/03/84 263.33 MINV S14AT: TREAS OK1VERS LTC PBL 6.093.00 f 3z 4M70 12 /03184 _ 3, 841.53 MN ST AT1.: T R:A 3 S/S S/S P3L 314+1070, 12/03/84 49313.53 MN STATIE TREAS S/S S/S PBL 79 + . I . •f. rte' . .. ....., . Q .. n •. .. w . .., J' ti.f.,�.�- �' 'r'1. 1'►.Ieo'P n.L."4• :y..y17C.� ?•1r1!i 3 :iL�'/'r...y'�AM7►!COI'r I.'�. '•• O,. .. - s. a y r i t ; d . ... . . _ ..• .a.•.....,. - .•.. r" -.i.. •...•:�'r�^..3.•h .w.eri�.i.:+.4 ....s:... -. - •:./� -. «.s•.... w. ... :..C,• Ii. i.,...L 4•. iI•i•. •r1'J�_+w ... Jac w ._ • • -a. c ... _ .. .. ... ... .. �� � ` .. ... 1954 CITY OF MAALEWOOD CM HECK RESISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOJNT V-:' N:) 0? ; -. I TEM DESCRIPTION • � - 3240450 3?4N50 12/J3/34 12/03/84 T8 20 • . N3?T4«I_ST N B_ TELEPHONE - 324NSU 12/33/84 359.J) 359.01 1�)RT�IwE'STEA h f3: T� - L..PHON� - 324ASU 12/03/84 38 NIRT44ESTERN SELL TEL EPHDl�,�E 3140450 12/03/84 3R.90 NORT4WESTEIN BELL T "LE PNONE 3c4A50 12/03/84 38.90 N PT�WESTE3 N BELL - TELEPttom- t 3t4N50 12/J31P4 33.90. N °3P,TI wESTE R N BELL 4 r- - _ 041 .T h BELL T =LEP HDiV E 3140U 324N5U 1 2/J3/84 12/33/84 39.50- NJP.T4W -ST AN BELL TEL- PHO�ii_ T- LEPH0NAE 324NSU 12/03/84 39.30 39.4"0 N1)RTlq wE'ST =3N BELL T= LEpr3NF ft. 324N5U 12/33/84 19.50 N)RT44ESTERN B_LL TELEPHONE 3Z 4N50 1.2/J3/8 4 23.30 N ??TiWcST::.�N SELL TEL TELEPHONE 3240450 12/:3/84 19.5^ NI RT•IWEST =2 N BELL TEL =PHON E 314 *.50 12/;:3/.8.4 39,Ja 8'r -LL r NW 8_LL TELEP TEL EPHO N E 3t4N50 12/% ;3/84 38 NJ BELL TEIE�t+ONE NW 3'i.L TELEP40N- T= LE -PHoNE TE L 3240453 324N50 12/:3/84 12/J3/84 359.31 NW B'Ll TIEDHJIIE E P H 31Y E = T�LEPH3N E 324 12/13/$4 44.52 15 Nw BELL T LEPHONE T= LEPRON= � 324y50 12/?3/84 .5] 1i3 NW 3 E,. L T- LEPH3NE - - .- TELEPHONE 324N50 12/03/84 11 •58 N BELL TEL. PHONE TEL EPri�iN 324P450 1 2/:3/84 • - - $ N 9E.L TELEPHONE hW B_LL TELEPRINE T ELEP H ONE 3L4lV5J 12/43/84 6T 95 Nw 37"' L T:LcPH3NE TELEPHONE TELEPH0N E 1,04.11 344NBO 12/33184 2.44" 2o4J �t.S.� 3140480 1 2/03/84 N.S UTILITIES 324NKU 12103/84 2.40 • N.S. UTI LI TIE S � 324NFO 12/JS/$4 445.42 iV•S•� .- UTILITIES 3e4Na.0 12/03/84 6.33 � � N.�. UTILITIES 46J•3R �r ,. UTI LI TIE S 324P60 12/03/84 200.03 U S PDSTM�ST'R 0.5; TA G 203.30 f 325A l5 12/03/84 129.95 A TAT 129.95 • TELEPHDN IE . 32 5M69 325M69 12/)3/84 12/03184 99267 � • AS 394"133 .. MI !VN STAT : TREASURER ORI V =RS LIC PBL 99657.85 t Mi NN STATE TRE4SUP,ER DRIVERS LIC PBL , 325M69 12/03/84 12/03/84 69153o39 _ _ M.NV STA T:. THE 4SUR_R DRIVERS LIC PBL .. ,- .. _ - _ .v _ • -•.s r.s. .,.y. ♦•K- •yi! -r,r.. .. .. ... .. •• +r...., rt. . .•R .... -. r n. r .a r ... .. .. ... - r r e R467 1984 CITY OF MAFLE WOOD CIMECK REG?STER CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT V_ND ©4 ITEM DESCRIPTIO 326 P69 12/J3/84 166.30 MINN STAT. TREASURER 3RI V =RS LTC PBL 6.31909 .531442 12/J 69 ?w3 F DX 4 NNA PT WAGES PBL 331 049. 12/03/84 85.5] CL =R( OF COURT COJNTY LIC . P BL 331 Con 12136#1 3/84 10009 CLER( OF LOUR T NOTARY STAMP 95.50 331 M2U 12 1 f 8 4 24,225.30 M:TRO WAST_ CO* TROL SURTA' P8L 331 M20 12/03/R4 242.?5o H =TRO MAST= CONTROL SURTAX PBL 239982.75 ! «ff *f 331M69 1 2/ t3fR4 69574.35 MINN STAT- TREAS DRI VTRS LIC APL 331"69 12/;#3/84 123.:3 M&NN STATE TREAS DRI VERS LIC PBL 6,697.35 # 332316 12/03/84 239900.03 T±1US.EY D:.V:LMNT REFUN:) ESC,tROwi 23,309. nC 332045 12103184 30 *' CHIP'EW4 SPRIN ;S MATER COGL�R 3,.35 t �tf :•t 332M69 12/:3184 14• ^93.33 MTNN STAT: TREASJRER DRIVERS LIC FSL ( 332M69 12/33/84 332.13 MINN STATZ TRCAS DRIVERS LIC °BL 14 t425.J0 !ff•ft 332M5 12/33/84 U4 9 OF M *VNESOTA TRA VTL TRAIN 20.37 3s3j31 12/33/84 47.013 ST P%'UL TeVoI TRA TRAINING 47.00 off :t: 313 C4J 12/03/84 56.53 CLERK OF COURT LICENSE PBL Ad .. .. .. _. !:: --..r ... 000, ...! .a..., ti• r 4.� • w . _ . v., _mod.. .. ... ...w .. _ .. _ .. _ - .. _ .. .. a �� � , 1984 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER ZHECK Na. DATE AMDJNT ITEM DESCRIPTION 56.50 t _ 333045 12/33/84 12.)n DISO4TC-t PU3LISHING l2.JC 333M59 12/J3184 8 96.54 MINN STAT: TREAS ? -� D IW S L.0 FPL 333469 12/03/84 27903 MINN STAT= TR74S DRI LIC P3L 8v465.54 Ott : *t 33P 12/u3/A4 69546.12 MN STATE TREAS PrRA PER P0L 333"I76 12/64'3/84 8 9 P53.79 MN STAT: TREAS P_RA P =RA P3L 15 •534.91 S34428 12/03/84 �?. ^J W3ttJLM JJDYT _S �1A�,'* t 334429 12/13/84 R. 5 SUVIAV K4T-lY PT wAScS R.53 • 534741 12/03/84 21 9791.34 RI —S3 COVIACTIV3V C'?NTRACT PYM 21,791.3► .434C41 12/)3184 1013 CHLE3rCK JJDY TRAVEL TRAINING 334C47 12/c3/84 '! . 75 CHLE3 ECK JJDY TRA V-r L TRAINING 334C47 12/33/f34 7.25 CWL'c3E .K JUDY TRAVEL TRATKING 334C57 S34C57 12/03/94 2923 CHL_3r:K JUDY TRA V =L TRAINING 12/03/84 2.23 CHLE3ECK JJDY TRAVEL TRAINING SS4E57 '3 2/03/84 013 C4lLE3ECK JUDY TR4 VEL TRAINI 4.56 334469 12/03/84 6085.75 MINN STATE TR =:.S DRI VERS P LIC 3L .334M59 12/03/84 68.00 MINN STAT: TREAS ORI HERS LIC ' 6#953.75 334N90 1 2/D3/84 3.53 N.S9 UTILITIES • 1984 CITY OF MAPLEW003 CHECK 2EfISTER CHECK N09 DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTIO% l 334W80 12/'3/84 T3.97 N.S.a UTILITIES 334N80 12 /%'0 /84 83.83 N.S.l UTI LIT1 S 334N SD 12/C3/84 751060 N.S. UTILITIES 334NEL 12/03/84 84925 *. S's 't UTILITIES 334N80 12/03/84 352.88 N,S.' UTILITIES 675.06 3 5223 12/03/84 63.1 1 M;,D3VA.,DS 0RI V =nS LiC P6L 63.07 33574; 12/,:3/84 75 CINNAMON STICKS PROGRAMS 75* 33 335 r69 12 /J 3/.34 6, 563.55 MTNN ST AT_ TR7A S )RI VEERS LIC BBL 335M59 12/j3/84 20Fo)3 MIN4 STAT- TREAS DRIVERS L:C 0 13L 6 , 9771.55 f 335871 12/03/84 83$.91 MINN ST TREAS SURTAX SURTAX PBL 335 11 1.21L'3/84 150 TOka* MINN ST TRc.AS SURTAX SURTAX FAL 1 322.13 1 51,029,69 FUND D1 TOTAL GENERAL 591.68 IFJVn 03 TOTAL Hy:)RANIT C #AQG` 219?'91934 FU40 39 TOTAL 84 -4 MCCLELLAND 23. T00.'J^ FUVn. 43 TOTAL 84m8 T OU SLEY ADC 13,3 FUN) 92 TOTAL PAYULL 6EN_FIT 208 9799.99 TOTAL yNESSARY EXPENDITURES SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING C C ACCOUNTS PAYABLE DECEMBER,....Qa, .. �.i 1� ' P,a -ge ...1 1 1984 CITY D.F M APLEWOOD C REGISTER ' CHECK NUJ. UMTE A MOUNT ITEM DESCRIPTION 345697 11/26184 145 .63 JIVES PERRY _ APT WAGES 146963 + - 345698 11128/84 31.88 KNUT33V. CA.TH]r VT WA GES 345649 11/29/84 114 L AL..IER 3AN PT WAGES 114.75 .345731 1112 184 503 LARSON C J PT WAGES 503 • 4570 11 /28/84 1020 LARS3N DEM S PT WAGES 345702 11/28/84 365 .50 LUBA MCRIS.4 PT WAGES 365.50 345703 11/28/84 195 950 MAUSTOV KENNETH PT WAGES 195.5 0 „3457;4 11/28184 14.45 MAYNAnD WILLI PT WAGES 14.45 345 7J 5 11/23,184 304 .31 MEE'Hk V PA 4 ELA PT WAGES 304.30 -.3457U6 11/28/84 11.05 M34 KATflIE PT WAGES 11.35 ,345 7 u 7 11 / 28184 83.30 M'JLVrr GEI RGE PT WAGES 93.33 3451i� 8 11/28/84 1.11.35 R ICHk RDS GO RDON PT WAGES .111 .35 * „3457D9 11 /28!84 63. ^0 SCNA)T 4MY PT WAGES 68. 33 * 34511 11 /2f/P4 39.53 SCHMIDT WI LLIAM 'PT W 39.53 * , 4571 1 11 12 84 . 153.43 STACEY DAV PT WAG :.S 153.43 * ; 45712 2 11 /28/84 197020 TWEDT DONALD PT WAGES 19T.20 * 345713 11/28f84 25.35 VANN_LLI GARY PT WA GES 345713 11/28/84 1 VANVLLI GARY PT W 26.35 345714 11/28/84 21025 VTCK GERALD P T WAGES 21.25 � 3 45T1 5 11/28/84 342.98 VORW::RK TAMMY PT WAGES wr ws � C .. _.r:.Yy .M. ry . [.^.sM."'yTl^` . .. �M"i :7lJ. -:.� - .�.. +r Y.' M ^.r..►...+ 1R. ! ". NI/';. ^..M!y.�. .. �.�.wR...t+w. .. <. .... ... _• .. 1984 CITY OF MAPLEWCOO CH =CK REGISTER CHECK No. DATE AM9UNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION i 342.98 345716 11/28/84 119,43 ZEQERS RO ;_R PT WAGES 119.43 { F, 345721 11/28f84 28.93 E'LLINGSON ANN PT UA GIES - 28.90 t 345334 11 /28/84 20 ?033 44EALTH RESOURCES CONTRACT PYM .' 200.00 `j 345125 11/28/84 175, 30 CORPORkTE RISK M4NG CONTRACT PYM 175.31 1 ! 34516i 11128/84 5 0.23 SIMP:EK TIME SUPPLIES 345161 11/28/84 11.26 SIM T14E SUPPLIES 61.46 f; ' 345164 11/28/84 35oCo0 MEEMAN JAMES CANIN:� ALLOJANCf ! 35 .0 345171. 11/28/84 1, AQUAtR0L 14C CONTRACT PYM 1,430.70 _ 345246 11/28/84 999 97 MJE'L_ER PI PELINERS CONTRACT PYM 999.91' • 345315 11/28/84 99 G T 3 ARTS CO SUPPLIES 99. 00 f 345544 11 /29/84 18.x] No TL WI:LDLIF= F,3 SUBSCRIPTION � 18. ?O • 345359 11/28/84 266....8 . I A E SO .D E R AJTt� S_RV SUPPLIES 266.0B E .ti w ..- 1- r... , ._ _ ... ... w ,.. .._ .. ,.... y . ", 'b. •. ,..- ...:f1T- 1i.^+..�.�.w r.s7.q .•M'wn - ..wR .•^SR`s+... .�;.._.c_v •.- :•'nM+w 4 # _K..;• v..'•n n _r..r .x .. .4...,...� .. .. ... •. - _ r _. .�- - . . ..w .v ... � . M atiw+ _, -,..d y.4, .�f.� M.'.i :..`:1,- - i.cl.: lh.: w4w.r.•+il..5... '� -•.._ �M!!' - _"` "."I: .x �z.«s .. ... -e . i'....�- .. ... - . ,_ r. ...n. .... _ _ • 7 � .7 w 1994 CITY OF MAPLE WOOD CHECK RE3rST_ R �l+E K N0. DATE A40JNT V ='VDOP ITEM OESCRIPTI0' 345411 11/28/84 263.33 N= NNE'IV COUNTY TRAVEL TRAINING 260.'?D " 345516 11/28/84 78.53 3CA �0 A C � L CO CD SUPPLIES S LIDS PR3 G 78.50 � a 345559 11/28/84 1 ,409.41 CASE Powr -1 EQUIP SUPPLIES VEH 1 , + r 345117 11/28/84 156,83 AIN DE: ISON )1YZLLE PT WAGES { 156.9,3 345718' 1112£!84 239.30 SAIL_Y 2 ATRICI1% PT 9AuES 34571 S 11/28/84 73.11 BAILSY aATRICIA PT WAGES 345718 11!28/84 73.1O- BAILSY 9 ATRI4"w`IA PT WAGES 2 38.3 0 345119 1.1!28/84 7303 CARi.3JV! J344 AT WAGES T3.10 S 34572 11/28184 162.35 EAST U*0 P I CHAID PT WAGES 162.35 �i 345722 11/28/84 232.90 GRABOSKY SINE ILA PT WAGES r� 232.93 f: 345723 11/28/84 137.28 4qALVSRSON DOUGLAS FT WAGES SI 137.28 a� 345725 11/28/84 3 ARCHIT_CTJRAL ALL CONTRACT FYM 3 9532.46 345126 11/28/84 104950 AMER AUTO TRIM SUPPLIES 104.50 f 345727 11/.28/84 60000 BIGHLEY G4EN REFUND 63.0D f F 345728 11/28/84 17506 GIRDING SUPPLIES T, 175.96 345729 11l28/84 911.' 3 CADI_LlkC 2 LASTIC SUPPLIES r: E i rr i' i! C; El . 1984 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK NOe DATE A4DU4T VEVIDO� ITEM DESCRIPTIO 910.J8 . 34573) 11/28/84 75.00 DEE JAY GRAPHICS MAPLEWOOD MOT ION 75.3 0 345731 11/28/84 69.6D DONALDS SU?PLTES 69.6 3 t 345732 11/28f84 150.03 GOFF CONSTRUCTION REFUND 150.00 345733 11/28f84 5 *701. L3 L4TNE MI�N'� SUPPLIES 5,v701.013 345734 .. 11/28f84 20.30 REINEIT E3 UNIFORMS 20.0 345735 11/28 8D. 80 MA PLEW OOD 3 0WL PR OGRA MS i0.B0 345736 11/28184 230 00 MINN PLAN41NG ASSOC SUBSCRIPTION 20 .-►0 345737 11/28/84 268.95 OFFICE' EL= �TRONICS SUPPLIES 26'S.95 345738 11/28/84 95.03 ST PlI1L R:D CROSS BOOKS 95.00 * t 345739 11/28184 16.89 THOyALLA DAVID TRAVEL TRAINING 1.6.89 * 345A49 11/29f84 95.91 AMER TOOL SUPPLY SUPPLIES 345A48 11/29/84 1 34, 36 AMrR TOOL SUPPLY SUPPLIES 345A48 11/29/.84 59,22 AMER TOOL SUPPLY SUPPLIES 289.49 345A65 11/29/84 204.33 A2UA ?Y4E gIDWEST CHEMICAL TOILETS 345A65 11/29/84 17000 AOUAZYM= MIDWEST CHEMICAL TOILETS 221..00 345A68 11/29/84 35 .30 ARTS T3WI46 SUPPLIES 345A68' 11/29/84 1 33.0'0 ARTS TOW14G SUPPLIES VEH 165.00 345815 11/29/84 17962 BATTERY TIRE WHSE SUPPLIES VEN . 345 BI 5 11 18.12 BATTERY TIRE WISE SUPPLIES VEH i � a Ate. R ♦ - • - •,t. t .• J .- .�. ^...4.1.N4'!l...T.^a!�'. ;. < +Y . 'y.D' / .e. T•+y 'w.!••.;, ....w. . w R . .. 1 ..w. r. - . • •r , �. � w.r n+n..n -... . . r.w w . _ w- . a -. .a .. -« . .- P.n ...:.. ..- .�..d.r w` ... ar Va.'ZY ..�:Nt(!• ,wi•I.►�.' ' Mw-. M wY' Vi'+ M• I .ti..�v.. ..i.Ybc �....r. .... .. ... .. 1.« a•c. 7—.. r-..i -.. ,.. >{y.i= .. -, .. ...- .. _ _. �� - 1994 CITY 31F MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER C4EC K NO. DATE AMOUNT .VE ND DR ITEM DESCRIPTION. - 34581 5 345815 11 /29/ 84 11/29/84 _ _ . 51.2 1 48.48 BA TT AV T T I E WNS_ S U P PLIES VE14 84TT RV TIRE W4SE SUPPL VEH 235.42 � 345845 34iP45 11 /29/8 4 11/29/84 442:.88 1 351 51 BIAR3 OF dkTER COMM CONTRACT P YM 9 B3 AR3 3F J4T;R CIMM CONTRACT PYM 1 o 494.3 9 345852 11/29/84 92.22 92.22 BRISSMftVmKENNr -3Y a E SU- PLI�S : 345855 11/29/84 94.95 BROWV PMatD SUPPL. DES 94.95 • 345C26 11/29/84 23033 CANV4S PR30 REPAIR SUPPLIES 345C3j 11 129 84 24.61 CAPOLINA 3I0LO�ICAL SUPPLIES LI�S 345C33 345033 11/29/84 11/29/84 75.R4 CAPItZL SJPPLY SUPPLIES 94. g © 1 T0.64 CAvi r OL S SUPPLIES +► 345C35 345C3 8 11/29/84 11/29/84 44.55 CiWFAV STE RUG.3 RJ;S CLEANED _ 44.55 89013 CLEAV STE 2 RUGS RUGS CLEAN-ED + 345C55 11/29/84 198.56 COPY DVLICATING DU CCIc, 198.58 t • _ 345C56 345056 11/29184 11 /29/84 128986 CDLLINS E.rCtRiC REPAIR PAINT ZN 345056 11 /29/8 601.79 99.15 COLLINS Cc3LLIN E..CTRiC COLLINS E C REP4IR MA:Nt 2 88.8 3 .=CTRL REPAIR MAINT � 345C59 11/29/84 12.9? -- COPY EvUI'MENT INC PP SU LIES r ..r v tA• :f:.+V► K n R' r.w.!r. �- .-- - ..X:vlo A !"yti"F Ir���7 T; �'. r�., �... i. e�vr. �,: yyti�. n;- r•, �i' i•^, yw '!'N'S+'.'[s;. ?..;,,.nsta... r'tf1�'.. "'R�t'�M �Qw�N aAt�+ M+. 7- T+O.A.. �.. r.-.K •r, •r'� - .s _ _. M '. . t '. � ... . . • i . ... . - ♦•y .. N.+ .. +Y '�YI.r.�'�M'�'Q.•�l it'J ..�•fr��lub+ -Y�i.ti �WV. 4- sw►.r. •. •...r. .. . r r r. u{ 'il r r .. .r . .. �. �. i 4 � . i '� - iL ... ... k _ .y . -. u VV 1984 CITY DF MAPLEW003 CHECK REGISTER b. CtfECK NO. 34 TE AMOJNT =NOOK ITEM DESCRIPTIO' 345C58 11/29f84 26.61- COPY E2 UI 9 MENT INC SUPPLIES 345C58 11/29/84 26.61 COPY SQUI"MENT INC SUP $! 345C58' 11/29/84 1 ?, 65 COPY EQUI'MENT INC SUPPLIES 30..62 345C95 11/29/8-4 5.3O CUDE L A R RY SUPPLIES VEH 5.30 345D3u 11/29/84 50630 OALC3 SUPPLIES 345 03 0 11/29/84 113o53. DALCO SUPPLTES 34.5D3u 11/2 8.26 DALCO S UP PL /ES 345D3j 11/29/84 134.9? OALC1 SUPPLIES 345Cli 11/29/84 104.22 DALC3 SUPPLIES 355.35 34.5 D3 9 11/29/94 11069 DE GE G4.RDEN CTR SUPPL j ES y 345D39 11 /29/84 11.70 DEGE G4RD =N CTR SUPPLIES 23.39 345 043 11/29/4 522.36 DEPT OF PUBLIC SFTY REPAIR MAINT 345 04J 11/29/84 4300 DEFT OF PUBLIC SFTY REPAIR MA114T 562, 36 t 345060 11/29/84 7019 DOIRERTr KITHLEEN SUP PLjES ?.1 9 345E9J 11/29/84 22500 EVAN. BARRY VEHICLE ALLOYAN _ 225.0:0 345G57 11/29/94 333.30 GRAC= DJAV. .. CONSULTING I NSP 333 *39 345H1 6 1 1 /29/84 114.30 H4RM3N CLASS SUP VEH 119.30 +► 345I26 11129/84 65.82 IN4:.I LIVE SUPPLIES 65.82 t .. 000 .. ... 0000 0+000 . .: - r -. ". _.sir ►'_+. .c :al a. .n T -F; ^• f=' , :q.w.n..•+It�M!.Aw.ry f^.PI' ^.•+. ._- r•+- .. -r-. .r _ . 0000. . .. -.. y . .... - _. - �8 _ r . .. ._. 9999 :•aJ` rw �4 vi11L)•r .i ..rSw�C �:►.tii . fi ..'4.... a'y'.. >.. �..'lQ" ... • .. a . �- c. iY 'Y r w r . ►- -y W r ... _ .. -. � . .. .. � � . , / 1.984 CITY 0 M I� APLEWCOD CHECK RESIST -R C HECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VZ4DOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 345 131 11/29f94 8.24 INSTr- 21 RI SUPPLIES 8924 - 345I81 11/29/84 169.12• ITASCA EQUIP SUPPLICS VET _ 345I8J 11/29/84 596.29 ITAS:A E0JIV SUPPLIES VEM 427. t 345:86 11/29/84 25.50 INTL gUSINrSS MACH SUPPLIES 345I86 11/29/84 25.50 INTL RUSIVESS MAC+q SUPPLIES 51.3) 345 19,j 11/29/84 8.10 I-NTL COYF BLDG OFLS 803K 345K55 11/29/84 129.44 X40K LUM$_R SUPPL *ES 129.44 345L28 11129/84 35.3D LANG RICH4RD CANINE ALLOWANCE 35.00 345M6j 11/29/84 B•,0 M4 M• F.O• A ;. TRAVEL TRAIN NG 8 •� '� 345N3u 1 53 13 R 2 e NC T1 ST UL CITY UTILITIES 345N3J 11/29/04 1 NORTH ST 2 4J L CITY UTI LITIE S � 1 .477.50 34 5 N Su 11/29/84 924998 NOS. . UTILITIES 345N8J 11/29/84 42 N.S. -Vi. UTILITIES 345N8J 11 /29 /84 N. S. 31 . UTILI TIES 345N80 11/29/84 . 2940 3,53 N.S.CO • UTILI TIES 345N8J 11/29/84 2.40 N.S.b.. UTILITIES 345N8L 11/29/84 3T2.63 N.S.s. UTILITIES 345N8J 11729/84 902948 N.S. *9 UTILITIES 345N8J 11/29/84 35.64 N.S.P# UTILITIES 345N8J 11/29184 103.91 N.S. " +. UTILITIES 345N8J 11/29f84 10296? N.S0 UTILITIES 345NFU 11/29f84 1'4.73 N.S.P. UTI LITIES . • _ .. : -• ;r+ ;,••Y 9:e „1'..�.i►:a �: t►. c 1 .�•}�.,�w:}r s a'y +,M: "•A...,.ey. s.- +,�.t.r.- �r+.w'•.s: �•r.r, .cy. -. �.-.'. ^• �,• •.•r.'..• ,. - .. .. _.. , . _. 1 . , .. _0000 y:�.: r......1V- :!s.s : -w:. +wr...J. ►.+max. - -.•v -'s •. .......c.. ..w..a.-..t..«i . i - A • .. ... 0000. . . ,.. .._ ✓. ra r-- . _ . .v .a ... . -... ... .. .+.n.... .. a .N • .. - � . .. _ 0000.. _ . 3:1 1 _{ 1 F 1954 CITY )F MAPtEYC^0 CHECK REGISTER CHECK N00 DATE AMOUNT VE'N00:z ITEM OESCRIPT /ON 345N8J 11/29184 73.29 NOS8 UTI LITIES ` 345N8 11/29/84 74.83 NOS. P. UTILITIES 345N8J 11/29184 9503 N.S. UTILITIES 345N8J 11/29/84 40 35 N.S. UTILITIES 345 N8J 11 /29/P 4 73.31 N.S.'. UTILITIES 345NBJ 11 /29/84 100052 N.So w UTILITIES 1 345N BJ 11/29/84 4 0? 5 N0S0l. UTI LITIES 345N8J 11/29/84 55.41 N.S.s. UTILITIES = 345N8J 11/29/84 54.39 N.S.Q. UTI LITI= S 345N8J 11/29184 3.15 N.S.'. UTILITIES 345N89 11/29/84 4.25 N.S.M. UTILITIES 345N8J 11/29/84 10025 N.S. . UTILITIES - 345N8J 11/29/84 3.40 N.S.'. UTILITIES 345N8•A 1 1 !29/ 3.4 69.17 N. So 0 UTI LI TIE S 345NSC 11/29/84 15.15 N.S.'0 UTILITIES 345N8J 11/29184 6302 N.S. UTILITIES 34 5 N 8J 11/29/84 fl 10 71 N.S.' . UTILI TIE S 345N8j 11/29f84 63.35 N.S.o. UTILITIES 34SNEJ 11/29!$4 269051 NOS.. UTILITIES 345N8J 11/29/84 239.41 N OS0 2 0 UTILITIES 345N8J 11/29/84 201017 N•S. 's • UTILITIES 345N8J 11/29/84 ?8.39 N.S. UTILITIES 345N86 11/29f84 9074 N.S.PO UTI LITIE S 345N8.j 11/29/84 285.51 N•S• UTILITIES 345N8J 11/29/84 68.1 2 N. S• 2 s UTI L TIE. S 345N83 11/29/84 81044 NOS* 0 UTILITIES -! 345N3U 1 I f 29f8 13.6 2 N. S. Po UTILI TIE S 5045.44 # 345N95 11 /29/84 9033 NJ TEE lAVE'RNE TRAYEL TKaINZf�G ! 9 345025 11/29/84 377 *33 OFFICE P°3)JCTS SUPPLIES 377.30 345 P4 11!29/84 4 H P OT3S 0 T 6D SUPPLIES 4.45 34iP45 11/29/84 7403.3 PTTN =Y 30JES CONTRACT PYM 7403D tom! *4f 345P64 11/29/84 9 PRETT N: R JJSEPM TRA VEL TRAINING 9073 345P65 11/29/84 12.30 PRi:3r WI_LIAM CERTIFICATION C - - _ _ f s . _ ., n .. N.: q T ri ^ f -< - '. * ^ .. 'l � T. f•. M K`...1 .�..1,1y(f, ..`r✓•l..t., ^'!1 rb M. ! ' b...? r A.'Y - ..)'f ... 'Y ..... aw ..fir -.. . ».r v `t ? .P • Y `. .r a r; M. R4 1964 CITY OF MAPLE Y033 'NECK REGISTER S CMECK NO. DATE AMOUNT V =NJOR ITEM DESCRIPTION i 12.13 : 345R:?9 11/29/$4 722.67 RAM COJNTY SU 345RJ 9 11/29f84 59T35.62 RitMSEY. COJNTr REPAIR MAINT 345RJ 9 11/29/84 167.54 RAMS = Y COUNTr SUPPLIES - 345 R_• 9 11/29/64 14 *60 RAMS_Y COUNTY CONTRACT PYM _ 69691.43 t 345R49 11/29184 203.* 10 ROAD I ESCJE SUPPLIES - 20301.3 345R5� 11/29/84 92. R4 RONS PRINTING SUPPLIES 92.84 f 345SJ5 11/2918 14003 S & r IF FICE OFFI CE-SUPP LIE S 345S-15 11 /Zy /84 7.93• S 9 T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLI S f 345 Sr 5 11/29/84 1 as *iO S 9 T 0 =F :E OFF IC= SUPPLIES - 345SL' 5 11/29/84 10403 S & T OFFICE OFFICE 'S UPPL1ES 345 S:5 11/29/84 21o75 S A T OFFICE OFFICE. SUPPLIES 345 S:� 5 11/29/84 .38 S 9 T OFF !CE OFF IC= S UPPL 1 ES 345 Sj S 11/29/64 B. R8 S S T 3FFI CE 0FFI CE S 345S:5 ll./29/84 6^. 28 S d T OFF *ME OFFICE SUPPLIES 345S�5 11 /29/84 32.18 S A T OFFICE OFF ICE SUPPLIES 345 S.;" 5 11/29/84 43, 7T S $ T OFF. CE OFFICE S UPPL FS 345 Sr- 5 11/29/84 74.50 S A T OFF ?CE IFFICE SUFFLIES 345S,:5 17/29/84 12403 S 9 T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 345S.)5 11/29/84 T.T6 S 8 r OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 345SU 5 11129/84 2.38 S $ T OFF ICE OFF ICS S VPPLIES 345 S4,5 11/29/84 8019 S 8 T 3FF!CE OFFICE - t3PPL i = S 345S%0 11/29/@4 13.56 S 8 T OFFICE pFFICa- SUPPLIES 345S- 11 /29/84 20920 S 9 T OFFICE OFFICE SUFPLIFES 345 11/29/84 23.20• S 8 T OFFICE OFFIC= SUPPLIES 345S25 11/29/94 8923 S 8 T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 3455.35 I L 1 /29/$4 7.76 S & r OFFICE OFFICE SUTPLiES - 345 S) 5 11 129/ 84 3.56 S A T OFFICE OFFICE S UPPLI 5S 3 41.95 345S55 11/29/84 5.53 S -v! RADIO SUPPLIES 345S55 11/29/84 14.95 SPECIALTY RADIO SUPPLIES 345S55 11/29/84 20onO SPECi4LTY RA►3T0 SUPPLIES 345555 11/29/84 25950 SPECI RA3 !0 SU - 345555 11/29/84 28.53 S'ECIA RADIO SUPPLIES 93.45 345558 11/29/84 207057 ST F4 -UL CITY OF RADIO MAINT - r . .. to a .. - • .e• ,=r.�.. �.,�. •''S'1R"'�`e- .:ac... ..c 0000.. ..r v!7 ._ 0000 .. .. .-.. . +-m •., ... < .... .. . - - _. r .. . x fi F y e F. .- .. _. _ ..c-- -. '..:�a': _ a.. �... 4. �i.. E... • . r..rw,:ir..a....r....w.,_..4 s. ..r ..L. a ..r ..i^s r.. �. r .G •! t i. e c 1984 CITY OF MAPLE W330 CHECK REisI ST_ R CHECK NO. DATE AMOJNT VZNDO'� ITEM DESCRIPTIO 345S58 11/29/8 21.10 ST PAUL CITY OF RADIO MAINT 145S58 71/29/84 161 ST PAUL CITY OF RAD MAINT 345 S5 8 11/29/84 162. RD. ST v4.UL CI OF RADIO MA IN 345558 11/29/84 41.[10 - ST PAUL CITY OF RADIO MAINT 345S58 .11/29/84 717.63 ST Pk UL CITY Or R AD 30 MAINT 1 X331.6? 345S68 11/29/84 19 -103 ST P %UL SJRURBAN BUS PROGRAMS 345S68' 11/29/184 10 [1003 ST PAUL SUBURBAN BUS PROGRAMS - 290.33 345S82 11/29/84 472963 STATE OF MN DOT SUPPLIES 345582 11129f84 10 [1.77m STAT= OF MN DOT SUPPLIES 372.68 - 345S64 11/2 35. 30 STEF" SCOTT CANINE ALLOVANC 35.30 345T2 9 11/29/84 554.40 T• SCMZFSKY SONS REPAIR MAINT 554.43 ff *ft: 345 T42' 11/29184 2.426.33 T= L:•TEI MIN lkLS CONTRACT PYM 345T42 11/29/84 520.30 T_LE•TERMIVALS CCNTRACT PYM 345 T42 11/29/84 1 , 213.35 TEL.E•?'E3 N!?NAL S CONTRACT PYM � 345T42 11/29/84 260.3 3 T -LE • TER MI NALS C ON T R ACT PYM 4 345T93 11/29164 43.75 TWIN CITY FILTER SUPPLIES �. 43.7 5 345U85 11 /29!84 T 2 2 0 T' R A UN_V_ SAL MEaZ.. " L UPP S M�a S tIF 27.23 # 345V5u 11129/84 33.40 VIRTJE PRIlT!NG SUPPLIES _ 345V53 11/29/84 2^.. 3.5 VIRTUE PRI NTI VS SUPPLIES 53.45 t - . - .- 345Y2J w .. _ .. .. • .. .. 11/29/84 t fv • t1i ".I Mr'A ,'sM r. 7 ! }: !/.. �. .. gh. 52.75 ..l..n. : ..�. .yvyw -.T.. -.... -.fir ., . .. WARDS IATJRAL SCIECE p .. . • .. . w .. ,.. SUPPLIES I 1984 CITY OF MAP WOOD CHICK REG T-S TE R OHECK 'NO. DATE AMOJNT ITEM DESCRiPTT: 52.75 f 34S W2i 11/29/84 $993 W4RRFRS TRJE VALU SUPPLIES 345 W21 11/29/8 167.96 WARNERS TRUE V41U SUPPLIES 345Y21 11/29/84 33.87 WARN_RS TRJE VALU SUPPLIES 2DT.7S f 345W5j 11!29/84 93016 4irBE'R- TR OSETH INC SUPPLIES - 93.16 345W65 91/29/84 149.23 WWITE BEAR OFFICE SUPPLIES " 149.23 t 345u13 11 /29/84 1 �020.3D WI NF IE L3 M?ITCH =LL CONTRACT P'Y.M 34500 11/29/84 283.30 WINFIELD 41TCH^LL CONTRICT PYM 1.300.3 J 34 5 27J 11/29/84 8965 ZUER� HER J 04 N SUPPLIES 8.65 309255.84 FUVD 31 TDT AL GENER AL 3 093o53 FUN7 03 TOTAL HY3RA CHARGE 153.3.7 FUVD 10 TVAL MATER AVAILABIY 3, 532.46 FUND 13 TOTAL C.I.p. 1000 FUVD 32 TOTAL 83.12 RICE CNV 1 •051.51 FUVD 36 TOTAL S4.1 CLAUSEN A[ 1,02790 FUVD 47 TOTAL 78.1L HILLWOOD 14.50 FU43 BY TOTAL 83 -7 BEAVER CRi _ # 2.491.33 FJVO 90 TOTAL _ SANITARY SEWER - 2, 681.38 FUVD 96 TOTAL VEHS CLE EQUIP o 499440.29 TOTI L ITEMS FINANCED BY RECREATIONAL FEES ar",.y`r °'r 4° 1 •'!`f: y ..r.re.. .. a ,.•.y,,,,.. 'Y''E�wc�n r•- 1,R,•,;. +s.►- w.+l•.r• !7- +ar+{ryll'A1" - a.,►,.. "l`�" . v:-!t _ - 1.�_..,,,.,... .. ; _ .? .. - .. _ CITY OF MAPLE6000 1 PAYROL.L•CNECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8023 CHECK OATE 11ow30484 PERIOD ENCING 11lw23.84 PAGE 1 oEPT•N0 EMPL•NO EMPLO NAME CHEClt- k4_... AMOUNT _ CLEARED ..... -, _....... _ _... . _. __ . 1 ' 0012 48436 8E1-M LOIS N 1126«CCGOI 4590 { 1 0002 206242018 EVANS BARRY R 112.6 -00002 1 •3 900 80 _. t...._.___l.- ._._. -__ �.,� _... _....._._.._ ._.._�....__...:_._....._.,... t 0002 1 � 849 .80 0010 473664414 JAHN DAVID J 1126 -00003 94.49 U010 47390014 7 JOHNS OH GREGCRr R 1126- OG004 0`.00 t � X , ___-- �.._..__ �.�...._... .... . _ .... .. 0010 . 4 69 23 .�. 5865 SPANS O�i�.lR. Y �., f ... . L _ ..E _ 1126 - 0�7 Q 0 � . ._ ..__.... 4 .. 94 58 ,r 0010 589.07 . " 11012 35 7340166 CUOE LARRY J It 2 6.00 006 175 .61 1 ' 01412 471520124 DOHERTY KATHLEEN M 1126.00007 431.22 0012 _ .47140-090 71400 908 H JOHN !. _ 112.6._DOt�D$...._ ..._ .1 ..94 " 0012 710.77 +: ' r 0021 469501078 FALST DANIEL F 1126MCO009 1 •057.82 t 0021 469743719 PETER NA NCY E 1126m00010 0.00 I X 1 0021 19057e82 r ._. ... X102 2 �.__ __ 46920 6.14. . _ HAG EN E .... _.._ . . AR L I AF... _ _ , ... J ..1.1 .2 b•fl.0 Q1.1.. _..._�...T14.15 i _ t 0022 391444446 Ma T Fr H.. S ALANA K 1126 "00012 546.44 t t: 0022 476704432 MOELLER MARGARET A 1126 - 00013 342 .99 t t OU22 473327550 __ A 11I GN L0 0 S DEL ORES _ -A 1 . 12 6a» flQ 014 4 j 0022 2 x068.46 • , ' ' 0031 471322198 AUREL IUS LUC ILLE E 1126 -00015 994• E8 t .4 UO31 474264816 SELVOG BETTY 0 1126 -00016 521.03 ; I , 0031 . __ .... _..._..... _....... w. _.. _ . ..._ ..._. _.._.._ _ .. _ . �_.. ._..M_.._....._�._........._.._ ..._.._.. .... .. _... _.......... __.._......_....«_.. �......,.. .....:._...,.._...._....._,�.. ......._.... ......._:_...... ........_:.._:...._._..._._µ 3 t. 0033 . ...... 4 7 T 28 8 38 9 ...... GR EEN _.. _._. PHY LLIS 0033 472244994. HENSLEY pATR IC IA A 1126- 00018 1 66.86 t t 0033 , 4176620547- KELSEY CONNTE L 1126.00019 1:54.91 - 003 3 4 76269815 __ . T JE A N NE , L .1126-w 1 � 0033 468364435 VIETOR L CRIIAINE S 1126- Oi7L21 444.64 t . `' f._.. _ _... .. _...... (1033 1 X20 i . 0034 47409752 3 STOTTLEMYER EDIT" 6 1126 -00022 45.20 t 1 9034 45.2C +. . %f, ., ►,` - - -_. _ _._. _ 0041 4684617 COLLINS KENNETH V 1126 - 03.021. 1 9029.92 ,.. 0041 477 369263 MARTINSON CAROL F 1126 -00024 344.37 0041 475323181 NELSON ROBERT 0 1126•GCO25 920• ?3 - t t 0(]41 47722.7636 CMATN JOY c 1126 -OUO26 387.11 .- -. -... -. t 1 ,a 0041 0041 471502356 469602934 RICHIE SVENDSEN CAROLE JCANNE L M 1126 1124 -w00028 432.51 506.58 _._........_ -- ., ` ,:' 0041 1p 3 9 6 21.21 i CITY OF MAPLEWOOC PAYROLL- ChECKS I £SISTER CYCLE 8023 CHECK CAT 11- PERIOD ENCING 11.23 -w84 PA GE 2 ,... ,. _ DEPT •NO EMPL NJ EMPLOYEE NAM_ ' E CHECK•NO AMOUNT' CLEAREQ . . OU42 477481364 ARNOLD DAVID L 1126 91.3 52 0042 4 71 492115 ATCHISON JOHN H 11 26- 00030 8 35.1 0042 476721577 EA�ICK JO"N j 1126 - *00031 677.44 u04 2 7� 8 74 , 4 .8 18 8,� FGER ON JOSEPH a - i 12b 730032 496 U042' 472721 660 EOHL JOHN C 1126 -00033 507•£9 (` 1 + `�►��: ss( 0042 4696P9867 BOWMAN RICK A 1126 00034 696.78 t ,� 00 42 4 6 X34 61930 CLAUSON . . � DAL_ K 1126 - ►00035 ... 817.96 ; " : J042 476446119 CREGER RICHARD C 1126 -COC36 914•C4 9042 47,. 26 7887 GREEN N ORMAN L 112 6- XO3037 942.06 < 469568516 IFALWEG _.... KEVIN _ R .1126 -0J -038 ._..._ 8.51.50 t.._._... 1 1442 47 3 60491.6 MERBERT� MICHAEL .! 1126 -09039 $1b.D7,.._.�_..t �! 0342 472222131 KOFTUS DINALO V 1126.43040 400.77 } J042 4715635.91_ LANG _........ ..... RIC1+ARO .! 112.6 - 00041 ... 1 *.013.29....__. _.. w..._... 0042 47649,.1;88 LEE ROGER W 112.6 -00042 901 .30 ( _......_.__.__. _.. __..._.�_....._.._ 1" , 0042 4746076:86 M €EHAN•JR .JAMES E 1126 -00043 806.91 . . __.._ 0042 469442063 MOE'SCHTER RICHARD r 1126 -00044 _ . 922.C8 t I 4 0042 476340990 MORELLI RAYMOND J 1126 -00045 628.10 " 0042 46 *462884 PELTI ER WILLIAM F 1126 - 0004.6 837954 ( 1 t U042 4 ?1564,01 RYAN MICHAEL F 1126-Cu047 1 X064.12 t I 0042 47`152045 7 SKALMAN DONALD Y 112 6- 0048 800.09 t . ! - 0042 473548226 STAFNE GREGORY L 1126 -00049 869.80 ( I 1 . _ U i� 4 .. 4 71 721 20 4 ...... S .TEPEE .. N SCOTT L 112 00O S�J _ . U042 4715700251 STILL V:RNON T 1126 -00051 836.62 t 1 0042 .471629204 STOCKTON DERRELL T 1126 - 00052 817.46 ( 1 f U042 4716.12052 THCMALLA . DAVID J 1126•CCO53 587 i4 JU42 475363333 WILLIAMS DUANE J 112640354 755.22 t 1 0042 474261130 ZAPPA JOSEPH A 1126•CCO55 761908 ( 1 ! JtN 219097od2 ;. 0043 475548434-. _ 8_CKER ...___ . ._. .. RCNALO D 11 0 0 5 6 858.V.._�._, 1..._ , �� 0043 469441789 GRAF DAVI D M .. - __...._. 1126 -00057 758,08 ..._i_. _... t ._ �...._.. r._,.,_..__........_.. ..�..._..�_.._.�.___-- 1 .._._.__ 0043 469820466 NE INt STEP wEN J 1126 -CCO58 831.87 ( I �. } ......M... 0043 39276C KARTS IS FLINT..._..r D 1126 - 00059.. _ _ 710•.13 .. __ �_�__..1_._._ 0043 4 13567791 MELAND£R JON A 1126 - 00660 883.10 __..___ _._�... __, __..__... .___ -.__ _ 0043 468360918 NELSON CAROL. M 1126- •COC61 11P062.30 ._.__ .. .. _ . OC43 4 ?1504316 FA 2SKA2QFF .. DAL • 1126 CCQ62 866 0043 474486071 VORWERK ROBERT E 1126.00063 861 •64 ( 1 i 0043 469502201 YOUNGR£N JAMES G 1126 - CC064 499• c5 t 1 s � ._ .. 0043 .. . _._....._ ... ..... ... ...._...._.._..T - 331 o 0 f - .� , ... _ ..._..___...__._...... .,..._......._� ._.__ .._.._ _...._.____.._.__.._.__....... .. _.... 0045 471401878 EPOERTSON JAMES M 1126 00065 744 0045 472242227 SCMAJT ALFRED C 1126 -a0066 858.77 t ) 0,045 1 11603.46 + ' 0046 468401899 CAHANES ANTMCNY G 1126•CDC67 902.59 ( 1 - 0046 417621236 FLAUGHER . JAMME L 1126- G0068. 556.10 � ) ..,_ 0046 3767109873 MACSLL RAYMJNO M 1126.00069 508.88 ( 1 : + j 0046 473807030 MARTIN SHAWN M 1126 -00070 488.07 `10. CITY OF PAALE.000D PAYROLL -a CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8023 CHECK CATE 11 -30 -84 PERI00 ENCING 114023 - PAGE 3 . �. ._...... DEPT• NO EMPL - N© EMPLOYEE NAME CHECKo A0. _ AMOUNT _.. CLEARED _.�__..... _. 0046 472 365919 AELSON KAREN A 1126 - 00071 589, 38 t I 0046 468600/13 RABINE J L 4126-wO3072 488007 4046 477700322 STAHNKE JULIE A 1126 00073 487.50 '•i �4 v. __... 0046 4 v 0 2 Ow 5 0051 471444267 EARTA MARIE L 1126»00074 398.68 DU51 .473566872 _. �AxDER ,. KENNET! G .'126 -0oQ75 9 61.5 2 '• OU 51 5044831 74 wEGWE RTM JUDITH A 1126 -40076 358.75 t �� ._ .� 00 51 1 ,71845► �► 14 f 0052 496308314 CASS WILLIAM C. 1126 - 400177 830 t �► `' ' .0052 471526254 FREBERG..: RONALD L..1126- 000.78__.. 629. 11.. 3052 502544337 HELEY RONALD J 1126 -40079 619904 t 1 0052 471501241 KANE MIC"AEL R 1126 -flO083 629.26 t 0052 468363473 KLAUSING ..HENRY _ F .1126- COfl81.._..._._ ._. 685.41 t_ 1 0052 475601431 LUTZ OAV 0 I P 112.6 - 001082 59603 t I 0052 471500547 MEYER GERALD W 1126 - 40.083 649.57 t 1 {? 1 E ,. _..._.�.._- ....._ _... .:...__... 0052 4769134500 OSWAL.D ERICK - 0 11 C00 84• 0600 I X � 0052 468166155 FRETTNER JOSEPH 6 1126 -00085 927.13 t _..._........... _..... _ 00,52 472241484 REINERT EDWARD A 1126 -06086 6..9.21 t 1 >. -. _.�...._......._ . _.w_._... _.. _....._.__.. 7052 .... 470346224 TEVL1NgJA _ . .. HARRY a 1126.00087 ..__._...._._..636.43. � OQS 2 475 58 977 7 Z 4 �'PA JAMES M 1126.OiI U 88 0 .00 t X ) tt 0052 _. t► } 0053 4 72 683970 A NL -J R. RAY C 112640089 8 24.23 t ..___....._ .._ _. _... _ ..�_._ .. _._ ... _..... _....._�___ 3 , � _ . 00.53 ._..__ _ 472481010 EL JAMES _ _... 6 11,E b..p 0090 ._ .. _...._- _. 4 .. 99 ..._ _ S _ , :...! ....._.,..,...._ ._.. _ ..._.. _ ..,..._.,r. �_._...._._._ __._ .. _....._ .. ' . . 0053 167246109 GEISSLER WALTER M 1126.00091 617.42 0053 511464671 GESSEL13 JAMES T 11 26- C0092 811.77 t 0053 475441668 .... _.. PECK . _ DENNIS L ..1126 -00093 ,r. 746.99 0053 472662522 PR IEBE WILLIAM 1126 -80094 602.14 t 1 ':........___...__........ 0053 4 349 Ski yf 0054 473683775 LOFGREN JO.-IN R 1126w00095 469.81 ,' t + �3 0054 _.... _.� 469.81 f . .:,. .... _ ._. _. 0058 471 562563 .... 8REHElM ROGER Y. 11 26- aG0096 _... 0058 477602582 EDSON DAVID 8 1126ft00097 678914 t I 0058 470 541590 MUL WEE GEORGE M 1126. 3098 641.89 t 1 - 0358 471 501-14 AADEAU EDWARD A 1126 -40099 70802 0 053 4 68 3617 20 MUTES ON L 4 VE R NE S 1126-00100 871973 0058 471 365993 OWEN GERALD C 1126 -00101 686-.45 t ) ` f - 0058 4.248.77 • 00 59 4 7624 97 MaC004A C Jo"N E 1126 - 00102 516, 49 t I 0059 475501000 MULVANEY DENNIS M 1126 -00103 703.51 ,! z,# JO 9 5 1 9220.00 �. W � z CITY OF MARLEWOOO PA YR OLL•CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE B023 CHECK DATE 11.30 -84 PERIOD ENDING 11 -23.84 PAGE 4 DEPT•NG EMPL -» NO E MFLOYEE NAME CM E CK h C AMOUN I CLEARED. =.3 U061 477300 J66 BRENNE'ft LOIS J 1126 -00 511.80._ t 1 ►``� 3061 468341993 KRLMyEL BARBARA A 1126- LI0105 2329C6 t ) oa a 0061 473260389 CDEGARD RCBERT 0 1126 -00106 984.E8 t ) OC61 468 532616 STAPLES _ PAUL INE. '� 126. 01 J7 793•C4 (.. 1 i 0.061 2021.58 • ;'' 0062 474 92 8762 BRENNER JAY A 1126- +Ct1108 0.00 t x ! "i 0062 471447219 BURKE MYLES R 1126 - 0.0109 639.21 t ) 0062 474608182 GERM44ii DAVID A 1126- COIICI _. __._. 639. !4 1 UCi62 472303411 GUSINDA MELV IN J 1126.00111 861 • F4 t ) ' 0062 502544121 HELEY ROLAND E 1126.00112 629.26 t ) '` 0062 468584797 HOPKINS THOMAS .. C .1126.00113 . -..._. _ _ 0 ( X _ ..... M_...... . _.._.._.._... _. � _...... _ . !" U062 469744593 *O SCMKA JAMES E 1126- 04114 0.00 t X ) 4b 0062 473969784 PUNTER TCNY 1126 -CC115 99.08 t ) " 0062 471748313 L IBHA ROT TH OMAS .._ d 11 Q.CO ` 0062 473563915 LIRDORFF DENNIS P 1126 -00117 591.57 t 0062 473565506 MARUSKA MARK A 1126 -CO118 619.04 ( ) 0062 444444444 AL TODD W W 112 6.00119 0.00 C X ) _ 0062 474078128 RASCHKI3 ALBERT F 1125 -00120 0000 t X , ., UU62 477646662 SANDQUIST THOMAS J 1126 -CO121 O.CQ t x ) 0062 _.. __ 4 TOwNL EY .. MICHAEL EL 1126 - 001 2Z . _ _._ 0 9 00 U062 47 TS 81931 T OWNLE Y P ATRICK J 112 6 -00123 0000 t x ) 0062 475745266 kARD TRGT G 11.26- -00124 0.00 ( x ! 0062 398164097 YUKER WALTER...-. . A_. 11266 &00125 I. J 0062 4032.42 • I U06 3 501 884242 AALGAtA RD ROSS A 1126 -00126 0. C0 t X ) 0063 470940175 ANDERSON CHRIS'�INE M 1.126.00127 0.00 t x ) 0063 475.823190 EARTMOLKY JCDY M 1 . 1 26 0063 468988277 BE SETH RONALD L 1126-00129 0.00 t X ! '� .., 0063 273483797 FLACK WILLIAM J 1126.60130 0.00 t X ) 0063 472 362015. EORAS+4 _ DONNA _ F 112 6 -401 31 _ _ 0000 s 0063 47y�96244$ ERYANT ROBERT C 1126 -00132 0.00 t x ! OU63 474442474 EUNKE RICHARD H 1126 -00133 O.GO,.. t X ) OC63 476924605 CASSEUAY _... ELIrZAB 4 112b•GC134 _.. 0 •Co t x ) . ..__�... ..... _.._.__..._.... � ... 0063 4736849?'6 CASSEOAY MARY K 1126 -00135 0000 X ! OC63 472905069 COLLINS STEVEN A 1126 -00136 O.CO t X ) aj t 006 0063 4 69441338 474829219 0£ MARS. OI£BEL - S A NDRA _.. JERRY L.. 0 1126.00137 _ 1126 - -00138 _.._ 0.00 0000 t x _.._._...- ) 0063 474901922 DINOERMAN JANINE N 1.126 -00139 0.00 t It ) OOb 3 476721245 C CUGH T Y LINDA R 112 6 -00 140 0.00 t X ) . _......_ ' 0063 476900508 DRAKE BARBARA .J 1126 -00141 0.00 t X ) ' 01063 469943845 FALTEISEK JAMES E 1126.00142 0000 t X ) 3063 472 9210 37 ... F ISCHER SUSAN M 1126- 00143 0•C0 .._.__. t X 0063 473925557 F C W LE R MARY K 1126.0014.4 0000 t x 0063 477988735 EAL.BRA ITH CHRI S 1126- 00145 0•CO t x ) 3063 469983628 GRAF MICHAEL .1126 - 6 0.00. t x ) -3063 5n-2f25654 44AMM O:.ADRA M 1126.00147 0000 t x ) 0063 475626712 HARPER JAMES 1126.00148 0.00 t X ! r r CITY OF MAPLEWOGC PAYROLL -CH= CKS :tc GISTER CYCLE B023 CHECK DATE 11 - PERIOD" ENDING 1123.84 PAGE 5 DEP T•N0 EMPL NO EMPLOYEE NAME CHECK - ND AMOUNT CLEARED • ..... _ __._ _.... . `+ 0063 474847 ?11 HEIMERL CAROL 1126 -00149 0 000 t X ) C^63 476686996 l- ERB KARIK J 1126 -00150 - 0.00 C: X ) 0063 4 7390878 5 HOLLI NGSWORTH LISA 1126-00151 0.00 t X ) UC53 473725137 I+UNT JACK 1126•C0152 70000 1 . T _ .__._......._ �.. 0063, 4 7 ^8811 40 JOHNSON JOSEPH _. A .1126•C0153 �, _._.... 0.00 L. f. 0063 469806100 JOHNSON TERESA L 1126 -00154 0000 t �X X Mid ► 0363 4 69862 99 KANE KAREN 1126 -00155 0000 t X 0063 47068054e KI£LSA_ KORI ....._.....0.,.112.6.03156 _. ._ 0000 { 0063 476743753 XLASSEN SUSAN 1126- 00157 0.00 t X . 0063 474743915 KORTUS JAMES M 1126 -00158 0.00 ( X UO6 3 468984615 KRLMM EL BECKY J . 1126 G015.9 _ 105. C0.- 0063 472484219 LE CLAIR MARY L 1126- 00160 0000 t X ) 1► '" 0063 472830498 LOEFFLER CAROL J 1126 -00161 D.GO t X ) 0063 470269324 MAC DONALD ELAINE'.. _._ E 1126 -00162 _.._ O,CO 0063 476923936 PAGILL JOSEPH M 1126- 00163 0000 t X ) R 0063 473700729 MA1' MICHELE A 11260000164 0000 t X ) : 0063 470926 NESSIN KATHLEEN M 1126 - 00165.... O.00. t X 0063 474 966150 N INE L ICH C TND I L 1126 00166 0.00 ( X 0063 469 58 3307 N I SKA JANET A 1126-00167 0.00 t X ) k. ► __ . _._ _....... 0063 4 ?4745123 NOES£N CRISTIN A 1126wCC168 0.00 ( X ) OU63 473565327 CLSON ROBERTA J '1126- m30169 0000 t X ) 01063 472808158 PAOGETT MARCIE 0 1126 -CO170 O. CO t X ) 0063 46984 310 5 .. - PE ARS ON LESLIE . A 112 6- 00171 _ 0.00 « --� i 0 ^ �S 3 4729419 fELTI ER MIC R 1126.0 3172 O.CO ( x 0063 468827763 RADA MICHAEL F 1126 -00173 0.00 t x ) 3063 248217342 SETTLES GERALD _...__ _ - 1126- 00174 O.CO 0063 396604919 SIANIGER SARAH J 1126 -00175 0000 t X ) - y � r, i 0063 4 7 ?869C67 SPANNBAUER DAWN M 1126.001 76 O.CO t X ) !' _ .. ... +0063 46994 5370 SPANN 9 A'UE R .. .. E VA ... C-11 T ... _...... _ _..._ a. 0063 46 742645 SPANNHAUER KATHLEEN G 1126.00118 0000 ( X ) •' r 0063 474345176 SPANNHAUER MARTIN J 1126 -00179 0000 t X ) _ _ _ ..... _. 0063 469965435 e�A PAUER NN SUSAN N L_ 1126 -POOI 80 ... _�_ O.CO _ [ X I 9063 4 7 7 92 01 i' 0 S T R A U S LAURA J 1 ! 2 d• 0.0181 0.00 t X ) r 0063 476861186. SULLIVAN JULiE 1126 -00182 O.GO t x - DOb 3 471823921 SZURE'K _... JOANN «.__ R .1126 ,00183 __.. O.00 .._ ...t X 3063 4701626422 TAUBMAN DCUGLAS J 1126 - 00184 611918 t ) r Of)6 3 4 CALLA CE JOIN T 1126.00185 67.50.1 t ) 3063 396324246 WARD R CY G 1126 - 00186 _. _ 2 78.31 __.....t ) 0063 474606610 IAHN WILLIAM A 1126 -00187 0000 ( X ) r ,} a 0063 _ 1 13 1.f 9 *► _... _... _ r 0064 151440508 GREW JANET M 11 26w001 522.99 ( ) OU 64 471384624 HORSNELL JUDITH A 1126 258.57 0064 474542163 SOUTTER CHRISTINE 1126 -CC1 300.C1 t ) r� 0066 1 ,06 / . 57 • " 0971 38944 8993 CMLEBEC K JUDY M 112 6 -00191 536 ( ) 0071 475502485 MISKELL NANCY J 1126- 00192 78.00 +0071 4 70 540551 CLSON GEOFFREY V 1126 -00193 951 .86 t ) 0071 106606 � E' r r CITY OF MAPLEw00C r PAYR.C CHECKS REGISTER CHICLE 8023 CHECK DATE 11 -30m84 PERIOD ENDING 11 -23 =84 PAGE 6 DEPT - NO E MPL -NO EMPLOY12C NAME CHECK.- NO AMOUNT CLEARED i ._.._._.._._..._.....:_. 007 2 4 776271?'$ ,EKSTRAND THOMAS G 1126140194 _. 6 _.:._.._. .._...� -� ___�..._�...._ 1 0072 47560 850 5 JOHNSON RANDALL L 1126 -m00195 564.79 j is j � -� , ... ...__ .... . - . ... 30 72. f 1 0073 476090677 4 S 7ROM MARJOR I E 1126•G0196 812.29 0073 812.29 i 0074 4631092.23._. GIRARO _ a LAWRENCE 6 X 12 00 197 111 � t( ; tt.j 0074 d 3875207 ?6 YIENGER ROBERT U 1126 -00198 566.43 t 0074_ 478.0 COU NT 00198 1 4 GRAND TOTAL 79032.58 i 47705808E ANDERSON NORMAN 6 1126 -40199 128.11 T t 0001 483621318 BA STTAN GARY li 1126 -OC 200 279990 t I U001 468200139 GREAVU JOMN C 1 126 -00201 27446.. 0001 472369035 MAIDA MARYLEE T 1126.03202 279.55 I I 00n1 477056/34 U MICHAEL T 1126 -CO203 150.00 t J • . . - - - 0001 .. .. .. _ ..... .. . -... .....1 9 • 110. Z +, 0031 474264816 SELVOG BETTY D 1126-00204A 416.64 C ) TERMINATION CHECK COUNT GRAND TOTAL 809.560010 i , J i t e:; 1 i fi 4' 40P .3 MEMORANDUM ka e T r TO: City Manager n;.t,'Jf FROM: Finance Director - RE paramedic Bill - Application for Cancellation J?`. J c DATE: December 3, 1984 - �.,� An.application for cancellation of a paramedic bill has been received from Robert Wi 1 tse. This individual was taken to United Hospital on May 13, 1984 and was having.trouble breathing. According to a social worker handling his case, Mr. Wiltse was forced to dispose of vi rtually all of his assets to pay for exorbitant medical bills. He i s temporarily staying at a local motel awaiting entrance to a nursi home. His family i paying for hi temporary lodging. Recently he was accepted for medical assistance benefi that will cover his nursing home costs. However, medical assistance benefits will not cover any costs (such as the paramedi bill) that were incurred earlier than three months before his acceptance for these benefits. On November 27 the attached application for cancellation of charges was received for the Councils' review and action. DFF : 1 nb F i APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF�� ;a PARAMEDIC AMBULANCE SERVICE CIiARGES e1o; NAME OF APPLICANT: oed� k�6 k v\ � lo � � • ��. t� ADDRESS OF APPLICANT: _ l N�� t,. e to a. . CITY STATE ZIP PATIENT'S NAME: DATE OF SERVICE: TOTAL CHARGES: �46 � REASON FOR REQUEST; 1. Financial Hardship (fill out reverse side): I certify that the income information . 1 have supplied on t true and accurate. ) V- d 0j Signed: Date: Ak qr r l e. I Y \c: T\ \ i n er t 1-� c-"4fi , ^ c Action by Council: MEMORANDUM R �'te To:. City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: Interfund Transfers for Unassessed Utility Improvements DATE: November 28, 1984 Transfers are made annually from the Water Availability Charge Fund, Hydrant Charge Fund, and the Sewer Fund to the Special Assessment Fund to amortize the cost of unassessed water and sewer improvements over the terms of the bonds that were issued to finance the improvement (The attached Table 12 from the 1983 Annual Financial Report provides a. schedule of these transfers.) When the tax levy for this year was adopted, - reducti ons were made in the debt service tax levies for the anticipated transfers scheduled for 1984. Therefore, the following transfers are recommended FROM TO Speci Assessment Fund $ 91 W.A.C. Fund 1973 Bonds ( #22) 71 Hydrant Fund 1 -77 Bonds ( #25) 6, Hydrant Fund .1979 Bonds (#27) 2,050 Sewer Fund 1979 Bonds ( #27) ,71 Total DFF : 1 nb m Table 12 Actual tax le $ 225 247,250 293,800 378 527,850 526,430 530,000 521,400 514 502,700 141 Transfers are made annually. from the Water Availability Charge (W.'A. C.) Capital Project Fund, Hydrant Charge Special Revenue Fund, and Sewer Enterprise Fund to the Special Assessment Fund to amortise the cost of uaassessed water and. sewer improvements over the terra of the bonds that were issued to finance the improvements. ** Actual tax levies are less than anticipated for two reasons. First, the scheduled levy per the bond register is based upon estimated special assessment levies which often exceed estimates. Second, interest on special assessments and the investment of monies from prepaid assessments exceed the rate of interest on the bonds. *** The actual tax levy in 1983 (payable 1984) was significantly less than anticipated and y p less than prior years due to a planned $385,090 transfer from the General Fund. The tax levy for the General Fund was increased by a corresponding amount in order to keep this Fund's tax levy at the legal maximum. 122 CITY OF MAPL EW00®, MINNESOTA Debt Service Tax Levies - Special Assessment Funds Last Ten Years Through Maturity (Unaudited) Less anticipated interf and transfers in* Year Scheduled Net taxes levy per From W.A. C. From Hydrant From Sewer tax levy pa ab bond register Fund Charge Fund Fund antici ated p 1974 $ 305 9 700 $ - $ - $ - $ 305 700 1975 376 52 - - 324 1976 427,300 62 - - 364 675 1977 495,700 67 - - 427 9 825 1978 639 72 - -- 566 550 1979 666,400 72 - - 593,931 .1980 783 82 77 2,050 621 1981 793,400 $1 77 2 632 , 359 1982 799 85, 312 77 2 634 1983 800 89 77 , 710 2 632 1984 802,400 91,875 77 2,050 630 1985 815 100 77,710 .2,050 635,340 1986 816 98, 77 2 638, 678 1987 817 105 77 2 631, 778 1988 818 107 77, 2 631, 315 1989 . 814,900 109 77 2,050 625 1990 806 110,719 :77 2 9 050 616 1991 800,400 116,812 77,710 20050 603,828 1992 813,400 122 77 2 611, 390 1993 762 127 77 2 , 050 555 199' 620 - 77 2 540 1995 239 - 6,010 2 231,240 1996 .238, 200 - 6 2,050 230 1997 248, - 6 , 010 2 , 050 240 1998 196,500 - 6 2 188,440 1999 64 - 6 2 55,940 Table 12 Actual tax le $ 225 247,250 293,800 378 527,850 526,430 530,000 521,400 514 502,700 141 Transfers are made annually. from the Water Availability Charge (W.'A. C.) Capital Project Fund, Hydrant Charge Special Revenue Fund, and Sewer Enterprise Fund to the Special Assessment Fund to amortise the cost of uaassessed water and. sewer improvements over the terra of the bonds that were issued to finance the improvements. ** Actual tax levies are less than anticipated for two reasons. First, the scheduled levy per the bond register is based upon estimated special assessment levies which often exceed estimates. Second, interest on special assessments and the investment of monies from prepaid assessments exceed the rate of interest on the bonds. *** The actual tax levy in 1983 (payable 1984) was significantly less than anticipated and y p less than prior years due to a planned $385,090 transfer from the General Fund. The tax levy for the General Fund was increased by a corresponding amount in order to keep this Fund's tax levy at the legal maximum. 122 M t _ im MEMORANDUM November 9, 1984 .To: Principals, Participating 4th and 5th Grade Teachers and Students - Maplewood Elementary Schools From: Fire Marshal A. C. Schadt Subject: State Fire Chiefs Poster Contest'- 1984 eft- Action by Council: Endow se rf._... Modif Rejected-. This year 142 students from our i Mapl ewood elementary schools participated in the annual Minnesota State Fire Chiefs Poster Contest. Attached for your information are local Maplewood winners, awards to be received and schools competing. Congratulations to the winners and all other participants who in some way contributed in our endeavor to create a fire -safe society. First place winners will be forwarded on to the State Chiefs Association for competition in early January 1985, the results of which will be made known shoul d' a contestant from Maplewood be chosen. Awards will be presented to the local winning contestants at 7:00 p.m., December 10, 1984, in the Maplewood City Council chambers, 1380 Frost Avenue, prior to the regular Council meeting. Again, my appreciation and thanks to all of you who participated and assisted in making this program another success for our young people. ACS: i s Local winners in the 1984 Mi nnesota State Fire Chiefs Poster Contest from Maplewood Elementary Schools that participated are as follows East County Line Fire District 1st Place Peter Bronson Age 10 Transf School 2nd Place David Preiner Age 11 Transfiguration School s 3rd Place Angie Bourasa Age 11. Transfigur School Gladstone Fire District l st Place Becky Rusinak Age 10 Weaver School 2nd.Place Robby Warwick Age 10 Weaver School 5 3rd Place Susan Hesse Age 10 Presentation School t Parksi de Fire District t 1st Place Tom Downs Age 10 St, Jerome's School 2nd Place Dan Hannigan Age 10 St. Jerome's School x v , 3rd Place Stacy Rauguth Age 9 Edgerton School � -! • First place winners receive a $25 check from their District Fire Department and a Tonka Toy aerial fire truck donated by Tonka Toy Corporation, Minneapolis. 1 Second place winners receive a $15 check from their District Fire Department. ti Third place winners receive a $5 check from their District Fire Department. i Posters were judged and evaluated by fi personnel. is f Schools Participating Principals St. Jerome's Sister M. Clarice Transfiguration T. Zarembski Presentati on Sister M. Geraldine Weaver R. Klaus Edgerton N. Cornforth t; .z MEMORANDUM TOO• City Manager FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson SUBJECT: Plan Amendment (RL to LSC) and rezoning (BC to NC) LOCATION: 2150 McMenemy Street APPLICANT: City of Maplewood OWNER: J. Brooks Hauser PROJECT: Brooks Superette, Inc. DATE: October 19, 1984 SUMMARY Request 1. Amend the land use plan from RL, residential low density to LSC, limited service commercial for the Brooks Superette at 2150 MCMenem y Street, 2. Rezone the Brooks Superette property from BC, business commercial to NC, neighborhood commercial, Reasons for the Request This site is part of the city -wide down - zoning program. The RL, land use plan and BC zoning designations are incompatible. A change in either, or both, should be made to give a clear signal as to how the city desires the property to be used. Comments The NC zone was specifically designed. for this type of site. It recognizes the long - standing commercial use of the property, but limits its use to neighborhood service uses that are c ompatible with a residential area. Council recently approved similar rezonings for Maplewood Plumbing (1690 English Street) and Forest Products Supply (1915 Castle Avenue), The site across the street was recently rezoned from BC to R -1, rather than NC, because a large part of the site is undeveloped. An NC zone would have allowed a significant commercial expansion. This is not the case with the Brooks Superette site. Rezoning to R -1 would restrict the site to the existing grocery store or a single dwelling. If the existing grocery business failed, it may not be feasible to destroy the existing building and rebuild a single dwelling. The building would then become a vacant eyesore. Recommendation (at least four votes in favor are required for approval) Approve the enclosed resolutions (pages 11 and 12) amending the land use plan from RL to LSC and rezoning from BC to NC, on the basis that: I 1. This site has been used commercially since the earl y 1960's. . 20 The NC zone was designed for neighborhood commercial uses. 30 The site is on the corner of two collector streets. 4. The city recently approved rezonings from BC to NC in two other similar situations. 2 BACKGROUND Site Description Size: 100 x 121' = 12,100 square feet - Existing land use: Brooks Superette. The building contains about 2,400 square feet. H sto o f the Use According to Keith Carlson with the Brooks firm, this building was constructed in the early 1960's for a convenience grocery store. The Brooks firm purchased it around 1965 and has operated it as the present superette since that time. Surrounding Land Uses North: County Road B. and a single dwelling. East and south: single dwellings West: McMenemy Street and single dwellings. Past Actions Between 1966 and 1969: This site was rezoned from R -1, single dwelling to BC, business commercial. 9- 12 -83: Council rezoned the Maplewood Plumbing site (1690 English Street) from BC to NC. 2-13-84: Council rezoned the Forest Products Supply site (1915 Castle Avenue) from BC to NC. 10- 22 -84: Council rezoned the two lots to the north from BC to R -1. Planning 1. Land use plan designation: present - -RL, residential low density; proposed - -LSC, limited service commercial. 2. The LSC, limited commercial center classification refers to commercial facilities on a neighborhood scale. Heavy industrial uses, s department store, motels, auto accessory stores, etc. would be prohibited, while other land uses of a medium intensity nature would be permitted subject to meeting certain performance standards. 3. Zoning: present - -BC, business commercial and R -1, single dwelling; proposed - -NC, neighborhood commercial. The south 21 feet is Zoned R -1, but is used as a required setback area for the superette. 4. Refer to page 9 for a listing of the uses permitted in the NC district. 5. Section 36 -485 requires four findings for the approval of a zone change. Refer to findings one through four in the resolution on page 11 � for these findings. 6. Refer to page 10 for a listing of the uses permitted in the BC zoning district. 7 If this site is rezoned to R -1, the superette would become a legal nonconforming use and the following city ordinances would apply (Section 36 -17) : a. Any lawful use of a building or land existing at the effective date of any provision of this chapter may be continued although such use does not conform to such - p r o v i s i o n s of this chapter. b. The substitution of one nonconforming use for another nonconforming use may be permitted by the city council by special use permit as provided in Article III of this chapter; provided that, such nonconforming use is determined by the city council to be of the same or more restrictive nature as the original nonconforming use. Whenever a nonconforming use of a building or land has been changed to a use of more restrictive classification or to a conforming use, such use will not thereafter be changed to a use .of a less restricted classification. c . A nonconforming building wholly or partially destroyed by fire, explosion, flood or other phenomenon, or legally condemned, may be reconstructed and used for the same nonconforming use; provided that, building reconstruction shall be commenced within one year from the date the building was . destroyed or condemned and shall be carried on without interruption. d. If a nonconforming use of a building or land is voluntarily abandoned and ceases for a continuous period of one year or more, subsequent use of such building or land shall be in conformity with the provisions of this chapter, e. No existing building or premises devoted to a use not permitted in the district in which such building or premises is located shall be enlarged, reconstructed or altered, unless: (1) Required by law or government order; or (2) There would not be a significant affect as determined by the city through a special use permit, on the deelopment of the parcel as zoned. Citizen Comments Forty= seven property owners within 350 feet of this property were asked their opinion of this proposal. Of the nineteen persons who responded, seven were in favor of the proposal and twelve were opposed. 4 Those opposed want the land use plan left as is and the superette property down - zoned to single dwelling on the basis that: 10 The new Cub store may cause the Brook's store to convert to a commercial use less compatible with the neighborhood. 2,w The grounds and building are unkept 3. Enough businesses in the area. 40 Traffic problems at the corner. 50 Hangout for kids because of video games. 6e Rodents sighted near the building,, Environmental Health The city has not had any complaints on Brooks Superette since a garbage complaint was received in 1979. A recent inspection found no evidence of rodents no any other problems with the exterior. Procedure 1. Plan amendment a. Planning commission recommendation following a public hearing b. City council decision 20 Rezoning a. Planning commission recommendation b. City council decision following a public hearing mb Attachments 1. Location map 2. Property line /zoning map 30 Parkside neighborhood land use plan (present) 4. NC uses 5. BC uses 6. Resolution (plan amendment) 7. Resolution (zone change) 58 •► • 36 ' LA v i' • i .. In I LITTLE CANADA D W le �9 35 �u Ro. -� 25 CO UNT Y or- Sandy Lo�te S KILLMAN AV UT VEO .AVEI W 4� J DOWNS AVE. = : 25 h QURKE V. Q i i~ _ _ ELDRI GE E AV s �,. BELMI.ON "A. BELOONT :KI A d V 58 . Ah K W Y 9 :50 W W t r T WT. VERNON AVL z E NO W p � W 8 60 ! i : t Q 26 2� ROSELAWN AVE. Y ' �- 0 3 t� J 0 t F9 • v, LWOOO AVE. B ELL Y 3 �� h iUM AVE. _ 11 FEN TO AVE S p it M 0 C M �� ! ♦ fsT AV L .; ITT% _ C AC bui W 1 f- 2 KINGS t t• _ • KING AVE. W � v � � 4 i _ AVE. O = � N. 3 4 � 30 1HH �9 11T1 57 ST. PAUL 0 LOCATION MAP Attachment One 4 N 6 I • � * tj Canada JA ( 3 4 ) 31 � C35) 3Z� 0 �. 7 c 4 i C - > CC C.3 4) 1 3 3 6 > ,j < ° v ap ' S U P E RETIE •� - - � • � Y~ � �� � �-,�- �= . - •' �, �;:� K S r � aZ if 4 7 jr K2 120 T?.3 v7. 773 1 ! fig• �' � , IE •� JN &C. .S2aC 52a & i f 050 0� p i4 1 �r 16 �f. 36 33a• •• 324.4 ac 1' - �• 5 LJ' ?ac 37 i J f T O ( �21) - t elk. - .. � . - • 13 Y4.99 G s - t. �.9 5 , sv As 80 8 100 80 8o o ' of ; W 2 q No ) c �� r t ) call) c 3 ) C sq , 4G ft. -� : t so so 8o so o too ao i left '! � Est :5�.... — _ .. _• Lb�j LINE / ZONING PROPERTY MAP i . t Attachment Two ' .. too h ` � _ �, • N ii a z5. ..1..... __ er • L3 G ;ma 73 '7 ull r'1, ro cot �/� 3 S2 r 4 ) • i ` t A 1. ^j G * „� j,►.� ICAO I cc 1 t. 'S�5 �.�•S IM+ 4(� 1C�C�.� �j.�! S��! 10C`! t: LAU Rte - -_ _ -1- V r �� 16 <12 p.� . • C ^' • • • 1�p ; i . 1 • �, �• «► I mow• :! 1.75. �,�1 • 4 91 f 0 (� L� c N F( 38 ) • ..1- .... _� C � 7) mob. 7 interchange o J 1 J � 1 ±� interc. Am ri oil" still 1 R inter bange mayor arieriai - Esc S -- - Parkside NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE - PLAN (Present) Attachment Three 8 1 � t y � H Rh '.% ti a L S • A � f M11� i S C 4 N 536-126 MAPLEWOOD CODE DMSION 5.5. NC NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL k DISTRICT Sec. 36 -126. Intent. • The intent of this district is to preserve. land for the use of businesses that are compatible with adjacent .residential land uses. Uses are limited to offices and smaller retail uses that cater to convenience shopping. Pedestrian and bicycle access are to be • emphasized. Sec. 36 -127. Permitted uses. Any of the following uses provided that the floor area of all buildings in any one NC zone shall not exceed three thousand (3,000) square feet: (1) Bakery or candy shop for the production of goods sold on the premises. (2) Beauty parlor or barber shop. (3) Dry cleaner or laundromat. All odors must be controlled so as not to be noticeable to adjacent residents. 1 (4) Office or medical and dental clinics. (5) Repair shop, except for motorized vehicles. No work shall be performed outside of the building. (6) Drug, hardware or grocery store. (7) Studio. (8) Tailor or dressmaker shop. (9) Veterinary or grooming clinic where there are not outside kennels or storage. • Sec. 36-129: Conditional uses (requires council approval). Any of the following uses provided that the floor area of all • buildings in any one NC zone shall not exceed eight thousand (8,000) square feet: (1) Any permitted use listed in section 36 -127. (2) Club, lodge or hall. (3) Private school, daycare center or community service use. (4) Taxi stand or bus stop. (5) Restaurant where there are no drive -up order windows or serving of food to patrons in their automobiles. All cooking odors must be controlled so as not to be noticeable to adja- cent residents. (6) Similar uses to those listed in this section. 9 Attachment Four s t . Sec. 36.153. Use regulations. In a BC Business and Commercial District in the city, the follow- ing regulations shall apply: (1) Perm tied uses: A building may be erected or used, and a lot may be used or occupied, for any of the following purposes, and no other: (a) Apartment for one family in combination with business � use. ' (b) Hotel, motel, tourist home, rooming house. or boarding- house. (c) Retail store, restaurant, office, agency, studio, bank, personal service and craftsmen's shop, mortuary. (d) Automobile sales agency that sells new cars or new and used cars, parking garage or lot, provided all facil- ities are located: and all services are conducted on the _ lot. (e) Newspaper publishing, job printing establi shment. (f) Theater. (g) Hand or automatic self - service laundry. ( Bakery or confectionery shop, for the production of ar- ticles to be sold only at retail on the premises. (i) Public ' garage or motor fuel station; provided that a license to operate such business is first obtained from the city council pursuant to chapter 17 of this Code. All public garages and motor fuel stations must be so lo- cated on the site and the site shall be of the size as provided in section 36 -156 of this division which defines kinds of operation, site area required and other data relating to such business. (j) Any use of the same general character as any of the above permitted uses; provided that, no use which is noxious or hazardous shall be permitted. . ... 10 Attachment Five WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the Maplewood comprehensive plan from RL, residential low density to LSC, .limited service commercial for 2150 McMenemy Street ' WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment. is as follows: 1. This plan amendment was initiated by the City of Maplewood. 2. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 5, 1984 to consider. this plan amendment. Notice thereof was .published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said plan amendment be approved. 3 . The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on 1984. The council considered reports and recommend- ations. from the planning commission and city staff. NOW., THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above -descr i bed plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 10 The site is on the corner two collector streets. 2. The city recently approved two similar plan amendments at 1915 Castle Avenue and 1590 English Street. 3.This.site has been used commercially since the early 1960's. Adopted this day of ,1984. Seconded by Ayes -- 11 attachment six Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of 1984 at 7 p.m. The following members were present. The following members were absent11 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business commercial to NC, neighborhood commercial for the northerly 140 feet of the following- described property: The North 154 feet of the West one (1) acre of the North half of the ,North half (N. 1/2 -of, N 1/2) of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter (NW 1/4 of NW 1/4) of Section 17, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, Village of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, subject to the rights of the public in the North 33 feet thereof and the West 33 feet thereof, for road purposes, according to the United States Government Survey thereof, This property is also known as 2150 McMenemy Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on November 5, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on , 1984 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following f ind,ings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed, change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will* serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare. 12 attachment seven 40 The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension . of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. 5. This site has been used commercially since the earl 1960's. y 6. The NC zone was designed for neighborhood commercial uses. 7. The site is on the corner of two collector streets, .8. The city recently approved rezonings from BC to NC in two other similar situations. Adopted this day of , 19849 Seconded by Ayes- - STATE OF MINNESOTA } COUNTY OF RAMSEY SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD r I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of 1984 with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this rezoning. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1984. City Clerk City of Maplewood, 13 �p TO: F ROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANTS: OWNER: DATE: A rY I MEMORANDUM City Manager Director of Community Development D. , :c.. -_-. ..�._ .� Land Use Plan Amendment (RL to LSC) and Zone Changes (R - to R -2 and BC to NC, LBC or R-2) Larpenteur Avenue between Edgerton and Jes Streets John E. Blomquist, Ince and City of Maplewood John E. Blomquist, Inc. November 29, 1984 SUMMARY Request 1. A land use plan amendment from RL, residential lower density to LSC, limited service commercial for the four lots on Edgerton (Mr. Blomquist's request). 2. Downzone the four lots on Edgerton Street from BC, business commercial to NC, neighborhood commercial (Mr. Blomquist' s request), 3. Downzone the three lots on Jessie Street from R -3 multiple dwelling to R -2, residence district (double dwelling) (staff request), Re asons for this Request i. This seven -lot site is included in the city's "downzoning" program. This means that the existing R -3, multiple dwelling and BC, business commercial zoning permit more intensive uses than anticipated by the RL, residential lower density land use plan designation. 2e Mr. Blomquist originally wanted to have all seven lots rezoned to LBC, limited ted business commercial to build an office. He could not get enough signatures on a petition to apply for a rezoning on the three lots ' n Jessie Street, from R -3 to LBC. (The BC zone on Edgerton Street already allows an office.) The planning. commission recommended an R -2 zone over all seven lots. Mr. Blomquist agrees to the R -2 zone for the three lots on Jessie Street, but feels that the four lots on Edgerton Street are better suited for commercial He feels that these lots may be too small for an office use and would prefer an NC zone to allow him the option of building a small convenience store. Comments There has been agreement by the applicant, planning commission, staff and most of the residents that the westerly three lots should be rezoned from R -3 to R -2. The issue is how to rezone the easterly four lots. There seems to be general agreement that the existing BC zone is too permissive and that an R -1 zone is too restrictive, considering the fact that the lot is relatively large for a single dwelling (19 square feet) . There are three alternatives: NC, neighborhood commercial; LBC, limited business commercial (office) or R -2, single and double dwellings, Most of the neighbors oppose an NC or LBC zone as being out -of- character with the area and creating traffic problems. There is also a convenience store within one mile that already serves this area, The site could be used for an office building, but this seems.out -of- character with the area and unnecessary I with St. Paul Business Center East and West developing within one mile, An . R -2 zone. would maintain the residential character . of the area and allow the developer a reasonable use of*his land, Recommendation Deny the plan amendment from RL to LSC for the easterly four lots and approve the enclosed. resolution rezoning the entire seven lot site from R -3 and BC to R -2. 2 BACKGROUND Site Description 1 Size: a. Westerly portion: .33 acre, with 110 feet of frontage on Jessie Street, consisting of three platted lots. b. Easterly portion: .44 acre, with 150 feet of frontage on Edgerton Street, consisting of four platted lots. CIO Total site: .77 acre 2. Existing land use: a single dwelling on Jessie Street Surrounding Land Uses North: two single dwellings East: Edgerton Street. Across the street are single dwel- lings that front on Edgerton Street, South: Larpenteur Avenue. Across the street are single dwellings that front on Larpenteur Avenue. West: Jessie Street. Across the street are single dwellings that front on Jessie Street. Past Actions This. site: 3 -6 -51: The four lots that front on Edgerton Street were rezoned from residence to business use. The present owner acquired the property in the 1940s and petitioned for the 1951 zone change. 3- 16 -67: Council approved a zone change from R -1, single dwelling to R -3, multiple dwelling for the three lots fronting on Jessie Street. Mr. Donald Blomquist had proposed a 24 -unit apartment building. The building site would have included the four lots to the east that were rezoned in 1951 to business use. Planning 1. Land use plan designation: Present: RL, residential lower density Proposed: LSC, limited service commercial for the four lots on Edgerton Street 2. Larpenteur Avenue is designated as a major arterial and Edgerton Street is designated as a minor arterial. 3 3. Policies from the plan: a. Page 18 -31: The LSC, limited service commercial classification "refers to commercial facilities on a neighborhood scale. Heavy industrial use, department. stores, motels, auto accessory stores, etc. would be prohibited, while other land uses of a medium intensity nature would be permitted subject to meeting certain performance standards." b. Page 18 -2 states that "zoning maps should be updated as necessary to make both the land use maps and zoning maps compatible." c. Page 18 -5: Wherever possible, changes in types of land use shall occur along rear property lines so that similar . uses front on the same street, or at the borders of areas separated by major man -made or natural barriers. d. Page 18 -29 states that an occasional double dwelling may be allowed in an area designated for RL, residential lower density use. 4. zoning: Present R--3, multiple dwelling and BC, business commercial 5. The R -3, multiple- dwelling zoning district permits buildings with three or more living units, such as townhouses and apartments. 60 .,Refer to page 10 for the uses permitted in a BC, business commercial district. 7. The R -2, double - dwelling zoning district permits double and single dwellings. 8. The LBC zoning district permits office and clinic uses. 916 Refer to page 9 for the uses permitted in a NC, neighbor- hood commercial district. 10. Compliance with land use laws: a. Section 36 -485 requires four findings for the approval of a zone change. Refer , to the findings in the resolution -on page 11 . b. Section 36- 119(a) requires at least 15,625 square feet for a multiple dwelling site. The westerly portion of the site, which is presently zoned for multiple dwelling use, contains only 14,375 square feet. Ramsey County Public Works Edgerton Street is planned to be an 86 -foot wide right -of -way. It is presently 66 feet wide adjacent to this site. An additional ten feet of right -of -way along the east line of this site is needed. The community design review board should require 4 .an extra ten feet of building and parking lot setback to allow for future acquisition. Citizen Comments A survey was. sent to the 86 properties within 350 feet of the ..site, asking if there were objections to an NC, LBC or R -2 zone. There were 29 replies, Five people objected to all three zones, preferring R -1, single dwelling. Sixteen people objected to the NC or LBC zone. Two people objected to the NC zone. Two obj ected . to the R -2 zone and four people had no objections to any of the three zones . Objections were as follows: .. - Too much traf f i c There is already convenience shopping within a few blocks Convenience store would be a hang -out for kids There is a blind intersection at Larpenteur and the tracks. Business would add to the problem by creating more traffic .No sidewalks Noise Too small a lot for .commercial Keep existing residential character Procedure 10 Land Use Plan Amendment a. Planning commission recommendation following a public hearing b. City council decision C-9 Metropolitan Council review for consistency with metropolitan systems 2. Zone Change: a. Planning commission recommendation b. City council decision following a public hearing jW Attachments 1. Locution map 2. Property line /existing zoning map 3 . Land use plan map (existing) 4. NC uses 5. BC uses 6. Resolution 5 E �= • � � YI F � t 1 41 W I Cl TT OF C (R2) f AHALLA- tAKf F LOCATION MAP �O Attachment 1 OF L /TTL,E Or IVADA 4 N� oio iC Gt• ���'.- o �-•� ,evert• !7S' S T a �3 QIIIIIIII .GROW na 7— Clk zl -- = VIP~ = k lie It --- Jq 1726 .4 _ t'r - - 1737 3 r, �S a7 5� - ► s 1718 -1717 _ _ 10, 10 r 1703 ` e ' Q i ' = J - - s. V v 1699 4 Z _ 14 � , .. — — � - — — 1715 _ � -- 1697 .-- .-- _ r9' — ' 4-- 1698 ,�- /� y` �� j9 j 1 693 , z. _� � �l. r _ I � � ,_ _ _ _ ,...� L 1685 �1 .� s # ! I ; C. .r . o_ 1694 lit ' a • b,�j t d 17 3 . - 1688 l 14 Q :r - r 1684 t C �. _ �. •` � 545 . __......R � � r �' �� si �J G � . t' 1 •� /1 `.• AAA r'E AVE Ilk • � •7 1 1 /e s+ i i to if 30 17 s _ � w r got lob _ f` •e i2�� s ��.. i ` t fZ: t+ Ito .5 � . tb► p 4.1 VI MV o1l�i JSTO1•� r ��- • 1741 � r• �! '•, if1 .:d 4. �• ��, C N EI = 0 t' / tit A / ' .�> 4 NOW PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP (£xisting) Q Attachment 2 4 N tttltl �. •� �� IIQ� � .:�: ter; � . �ii i It //■ - 1 t s - - t i PI moons Else _ 3C ��L► ww saw r � r .— sum 1► - • -�...� `�.i aflrl�- ma a • — ..: = ^�1�M" y ir•. rd1G •+...: L+..+r.f •r • i • t • s Rh SC LSC Parkside NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN .. (Existing) Attachment 3 Q N DTVISION 5.5. NC NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Sec. 36 -126. Intent. The intent of this district is to preserve land for the use of businesses that are compatible with adjacent residential land uses. Uses are limited to offices and smaller retail uses that cater to convenience shopping. Pedestrian and bicycle access are to be emphasized. (Ord. No. 539, § 1 4- 11 -83) Sec. 36 -127. Permitted uses. Any . of the following uses provided that the floor area of all buildings in any one NC zone shall not exceed three thousand (3,000) square feet: (1) Bakery or candy shop for the production of goods sold on the premises. (2) Beauty parlor or barber shop. (3) Dry cleaner or laundromat. All odors must be controlled so as not to be noticeable to adjacent residents. (4) Office or medical and dental clinics. (5) Repair shop, except for motorized vehicles. No work shall be performed outside of the building. (6) Drug, hardware or grocery store. (7) Studio. (8) Tailor or dressmaker shop. (9) Veterinary or grooming clinic where there are not outside kennels or storage. (Ord. No. 539, § 1, 4- 1.1 -83) • See. 36 -128. Accessory uses. [Accessory uses within an NC Neighborhood Commercial Dis- trict are as follows.-] (1) Off- street parking. (2) Signs, in accordance with the sign ordinance. (Ord. No. 539, § 1, 4- 11 -83) Sec. 36 -129. Conditional uses (requires council approval). Any of the following uses provided that the floor area of all buildings in any one NC zone shall not exceed eight thousand (8,000) square feet: (1) Any permitted use listed in' section 36 -127. i (2) Club, lodge or ball. (3) Private school, daycare center or community service use. (4) Taxi stand or bus stop. i (5) Restaurant where there are no drive -up order windows or serving of food to patrons in their automobiles. All cooking odors must be controlled so as not to be noticeable to adja- cent residents. (6) Similar uses to those listed in this section. (Ord. No. 539, § 1,4-11-83) Attachnent 4 i Sec. 36 -153. Use regulations. In a BC and Commercial District in the city, he follow- Q ing regulations shall apply y. . (1) Permitted uses: A building maybe erected or used, and a lot may be u* sed or occupied, for any of - the .following purposes, _ and no other. _ - (a) Apartment for one family in combination with ' . Y _ nth business u se. . (b) Hotel, motel, tourist home rooming' oomin house use or boarding _ • house. (c) Retail store, restaurant, office, agency, studio, ban personal service and craftsmen's shop, mortuary. •(d) Automobile sales agency that sells. new cars or new and used cars, parking garage or lot, provided all .facil- ities are located and all services are conducted on the lot.~ - (e) Newspaper publishing, job printin establishrnen g t. (f) . Theater. (g) Hand or automatic self - service laundry. ry . (h) Bakery or confection ery shop, for the production of ar- ticles to be sold only at retail on the P remises. (i) Public garage or motor fuel station;* provided that a _ license to operate such business is first obtained from the cit council y pursuant to chapter 17 of this Code. All public.garages and motor fuel stations must be so lo- cated on the site and the site shall be of the size as provided in section 36 -156 of this division which defines kinds of operation, site area required and other data _ relating to such business. (j) Any use of. the same general character as an y of the above permitted uses; provided that; no use which is noxious or hazardous shall be permitted. (2) Special exceptions: The followi fig uses are allowed when hen authorized by the*city council as a special exception: - ,($) All uses permitted in R -3 Residence Districts except p . the construction of dwelling houses permitted in divi- sions 3 and 4 of this article, R -1 and R -2 Residence Districts. (b) Processing and distributing tation for milk r g o other beverages, carting or hauling station. Xc) Place omusement, recreation or assembly, than . f a y, an a theater, when conducting indoors. (d) Yard for .storage, sale and distribution of "ice, coal fuel oil or building materials, when enclosed within a fence of not less than six (6) feet in' height, but not including junkyard, salvage, automobile • g . b le or other wrecking yard. (e) Used car lot. 10 Attachment Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city .council of the City of Ma lewood Minnesota was duly ca P , y l led and held in the council chambers in said city on the 10th day of December, 1984 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from R -3, multiple dwelling to R -2, double dwelling or the following-described ' property: g g described Lots 16 -18 and Lots 12 -15, Block Eight, King's Addition to the City of St. Paul. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezonin g is as follows: 1 This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36 Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning g Commission on October 15, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be Approved, 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing n 1 1984 to consider this g rezoning, Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons resent at said hearing w P g were given . an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff .and planning commission. " NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following .findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is needed to brie the zoning and g g land use plan into conformance. 2. R -2, double dwelling zoning would provide the maximum flexibility for developing the site consistent with the intent of the land use plan and zoning code, 3. The proposed change will not substantiall y injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 11 Attachment Six i 4. The proposed change will serve the best interests and. conveniences of the.. community, where applicable and the public welfare. 5. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. 6. An R -2 zone would preserve the residential character of the neighborhood, while allowing a reasonable use of the property. Adopted this 10th day of December, 1984. seconded by STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY SS. .CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of. the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the 10th day of December, 1984 with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this rezoning Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate ' seal of the city this 10th day of December, 1984. City clerk City of Maplewood. 12 F, TO FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: PROJECT: DATE Action by Council: Endorse MEMORANDUM 14odif - - --- Rejected- City Manager Dat Thomas.Ekstrand -- Associate Planner Variance -- Wooden Trash Enclosure 1918 Beam Avenue Best Buy Company Richard Schulze Best Buy Company ( Sound of Music) October 8 1984 SUMMARY - 013 Request Approval of a variance to have a wooden trash dumpster enclosure .(presently in place) , rather than one of masonry construction as code requires. Comments State statute requires that, before a variance may be granted, the following findings must be made: 1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property; 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. There is not any circumstance unique to the property which prevented the enclosure from being built of masonry. The applicant has indicated that it would be a hardship to remove the existing wood enclosure. The hardship, however, is economic. State law states that "economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship." The ordinance should be enforced or changed. The code requires a masonry enclosure for durability. Wooden trash enclosures do not hold up as well to the wear of garbage trucks and dumpsters. When they are not kept up, an eyesore develops. Recommendation Denial of the proposed variance to permit a wooden trash dumpster enclosure at the Best Buy Company, 1918 Beam Avenue, since: 1. There are no circumstances unique to the property which caused any hardship preventing code compliance. 2. The wooden enclosure does not provide the durability intended by code. BACKGROUND Site Description 1. Lot size: 24,500 square feet 2. Existing land use: Best Buy Company Surrounding and Uses Northerly: Beam Avenue Southerly: the rear yard of a single dwelling which fronts on Radatz Avenue Easterly: a vacant parcel, Burger King and Mr. Donut /Rapid Oil Change Westerly: Sherwin Williams and Options (furniture store) Past Action 8 -23 -83 : The review board approved the site plan and building elevations subject to eleven conditions. Condition number two read "outside trash dumpsters, if used, shall be stored in masonry enclosures with a 100 % opaque wooden gate according to ordinance, and shall be a color and material compatible with the. building. Location and design shall be subject to staff approval . " ' 9- 27 -83: The board conditionally approved the landscape plan. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 1. Land Use Plan designation: LSC, limited service commercial 2. Zoning: BC (M) , business commercial (modified) 3. Section 36-27(e) of the zoning code states that "trash storage _ containers shall be constructed on three sides with break -off block, _ face brick, or masonry. A gate that provides one hundred percent opaqueness shall be provided where a dumpster would be visible to the public or from an adjoining property." 4. Statutory requirements: Section 367.10, subdivision 6(2) of state law requires that the following findings be made before a variance can be granted: a. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. b. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. "Undue hardship as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter 2 ial character of the locality. Economic the essential nomic considerations along i shall not constitute an undue hardship f reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance . " Procedure .10 Recommendation by the board 20 Public hearing and decision by the city council jw Attachments: 1. Location map 2. Property line /zoning map 30 site plan 4. Applicant's statement dated 9 -14 -84 3 61 pw i J O � v SAN AVE. ROAD 2640 N. � W 1= h Z EDGEHILL. RD. all V h ` DEMONT AVE. 49 65 ' C ROOtC AVE Z • to � �• t W AV 11 to AVE. SEX INT AV ' AV E. L..�...J C� VA 1 RVA AV 2400 N. 36 d ANDVIEW VIK I _ Y oR. COURT ' TAE AV 36 c Pf SHERREN AVE AVE Cowsr 63 -. R EN AVE. ~ OPE AVE t~ ' LARK AVE LARK AVE. " RD. I LAURIE � _ UURIE RO M LOCATION MAP Attachment 1 WHITE BEAR LAKE us' 68 i7i 7Z- in oil W w000LYNN A (1 f URNE SS c E�3) CT LYDI � LYD-A IL N��c v at STAND MAP 1 W F11 (I.) MAP q... 68 (2.) CHIP, 0 (3.) CHIP & PRIVATE STREET (MESSABI AVE) NORTH ST. 4 N COUNTY ROAD 1 D~� �a y rl RED ii!! ■iii!! LO BSTER o - - • BEST ' • �� BUY «� N b coo �� bb • ........ t AMA' _ s - LBC • ,pis r. co r --pa c S. 47 �- ' 4-- _ m i1,4 ' H . 37PJi0 an �' • O er `N -•s �' Ito' _ •- _ ,Aciv _ _ • 4- fn Co . C. l AV Ew t- ( - 2 150' too' too we Aiwa •44ic- 4 w ( Z 7) ` — (2�� ♦ t 1 092 1 ?2 c o , P.1 26 + so -via o'io LT- 70 V _ F -s � URGER • w - 0 o MR ° 0U } tit j 2 40 d � t�g� 9G 30 I_' � � w 8 .4 5 ac. - S4 tt4c (7� 00 t t 1 060 p4 8 O Nis Ex 100 too* 140' . :c. : 39 u .45 &C. I-13 &t.. -s! 8 ' C- 89t 2) ASE R o. >rs� ��� .<. � ( 37 ) Il e 03a P HD it { ►9 1 s D`G E -►�0 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 5 Attachment 2J 14E TRASH ENCLOSURE..._. LOCATION 93 0 'o JRE .C. STAL �0 W �O 1.4 Oft 4b. -I� 4 "S t f N�Tr.� 1NL 1 SITE PLAN 6 Attachment 3 sell 111F - q M4 M I I V M -I� 4 "S t f N�Tr.� 1NL 1 SITE PLAN 6 Attachment 3 2. For building code appeal, provide: a. justification written for your appeal b. Testing results which indicate that your proposal is equivalent or better than the code requirement c. Six x p • lans indicating the method of application to the particular job. • h code provide written justification 3. For interpretation of t e • for your P � ' ve offic i ial ap peal* Outline facts where you believe the admi.nistrati c erred in interpreting the code. • R -1 single family districts) or $80 all other 4. Filing fee. $40 t • g districts) (pay O'UD able to: CITY OF MA ) NOTES cation cannot b e accepted An appl • e ted until all of the above items are 3.. . completed. ' to evaluate our proposal under' city 2. The purpose of the above data is your icies. You may refuse to provide this data. Refusal, laws and pol Y jeopardize a proval of your application. The above however , may P information will be made public to all who request it.* that you discuss your proposal with adjacent 3. Maplewood recommends t y property owners before formal application is made. Any conflicts that you. can resolve ahead of time will make it easier and faster for the city to process your application. PROCEDURE 1. Staff review and recommendation Planning ommission recommendation 2' g . in and makes the final decision 3, city council holds a public hearing of all meetings and should plan to attend* Failure to You will be notified do so may result in delay or denial of your application* Please allow at least six to eight weeks for a decisione r pp ant's signature J � 010/. 7 /-� (14 date rtov - L IAJ 4004:; 11 11 6" sit .e le Zr 4 oe T /1 1_ • Q_ �fKAS v�0 /7N�^P'�t' •T �j'(d.W . ! arhmPni d W.at ✓ -t ¢2 ro TO FROM SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: s Action by Council: MEMORANDUM Endorse Modifie City Manager Red ecte�. Thomas Ekstrand-- Associate Pladif6tf Conditional Use Permit H ighway 36 3M National Advertising Company Dayton's Bluff Sheet Metal Billboard November 7, 1984 SUMMARY Request w 1r__ q * * Approval of a conditional use permit to erect a double -faced billboard within 500 feet of a dwelling. The proposed sign would be 440 feet from the nearest house. Pro2osal 19 Billboard size: 10 by 36 feet- -360 square feet 2. Billboard height: 35 feet 3. Location: refer to the map on page 5 Comments Staff does not find any problem with the proposed billboard. During summer months the billboard would be hidden from the view of the .resident.s along Cope Avenue by the trees on the billboard site. The billboard would be partially visible during winter months, but would still be adequately buffered from these homes by the trees, Recommendation Adoption of the resolution on page 8 approving a conditional use permit for a 10 by 36 foot billboard for the 3M National Advertising Company. Approval is based on the findings listed in the resolution and subject to the following conditions: 10 Adherence to the site plan, dated October 16, 1984, unless a change is approved by the city's community design review board. 20 The typical requirement for periodic . review of this permit shall be waived. Council review of this permit shall take place only if a problem with the sign develops. BACKGROUND Site Description 10 Acreage: 2.5 acres 2. Existing land use: undeveloped Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Highway 36 .Southerly: undeveloped property zoned M -1, light manufacturing and planned LSC, limited service commercial. Easterly: Dayton's Bluff Sheet Metal Westerly: Burlington Northern railroad tracks Past Action 5- 26 -81: The review board conditionally, approved the placement of a billboard, under the old ordinance, in the same general location as the one proposed. This previous sign, however, was on railroad right -of -way. The billboard setback requirements were much less restrictive at that time. 5- 29 -81: The city issued a permit for this billboard, but it was never erected. 11 -8 -82: Council passed the present billboard ordinance. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 10 Land use plan designation: LSC 2 Zoning: M -1 3. Ordinance requirements: a. Section 36 -292 (a) states that billboards are a permitted use in an M -1 district. b. Section 36 -292 (b) (3) states that "billboards shall not be located closer than the following distances, unless the council approves a conditional use permit (3) 200 feet to a residential district or 500 feet to a residence." c. Section 36 -442 (b) states that approval of conditional use permits shall be based upon ten findings. Refer to th resolution on page 2 4 d. Section 36 -442 (e) states that . "all conditional use permits shall be reviewed b the council within one r s y year of the date of y initial approval, unless such review is waived by council decision or ordinance." Procedure r a 10 Recommendation by the review board 20 Public hearing and decision by the city council JC Attachments: a . 1. Location map 2. Property line /zoning map 30 Site plan 40 Applicant's letter dated 9 -17 -84 _ 50 Resolution 3 -P' to It. CITkl OF A & Ml F 6C T APN— C R2 PUD �, `1 " �,. � I Cr F F F R R L z r 40 IF -j ROAD ;6R L R t ®r IR F7 L Ole 101. F R PUD or F R R F F Ml DSEH4.L R R M I F 7 DEMON'r F (R2) w L i. R Q ' Lac Ml R J R R • L R 0 BC Q L-1 F Ml R • R Ml Ml Ml 3RANOVIE I MI F TRUNK WAY MI C* I -- MI F Ml - —- R 7 LR-3c '_" I R C OUNTY or 11C R R ST fo (R 2) ALTAa I 'WE R E F VLAU A S E E R-j P E AVE F R 6 C 4 R- Cr OWN- F L AW M 1 bE L WNT M NT I 4L 4. F fy ROSEWOO R R 2 F 0 000 SEW RIA 2) R2 4 R LBC F Poole, R 8C ............... AVE • N F0 S F E*l a C • !13C 1 ® 0 4 F LWJ R R R R F 41 4 cB-E Ra,1 I R 0 1 1 RIMY or R R R3 R 6u �� , , O S A AVE 4 I Rw IL r Ll R F BC 1 . f - 4 R2) R L AKf F %J Ba R C/ ry oF sr PAUL LOCATION MAP" 4 attachment one 4 •• : o METALS +� See • SHERREN • ft- 46 r - �• 4% >- lu All A& 7i 4 U 11t M_ W-�&% rw 0 P EL el f 1 40 40 • 1 4 t 9 1 04 1 1 i ' 4 '. • _jL-.r% ff W W Cell ml &Gag oqt a4 • ; t s ' 1 ele"lle 4 o4 •t � .� •�• •�, �.• •♦ '. • �� . f f .. � - .� � � j :J i .• i Lt . ' t 4 t �f. t.r• � .� � .!+ f .;•'l l .��' �1 � �: +z7-1 I t t t!+ 1. •• .S ,, w .. • •. • `0 4f •1 • • • 1. t 'A w AVE. 4,A 445 4 two: J �. i �d ~ •• •! i of i . +�' .� 1 'ij •. j 1i ►J�'� 4 �. { 1 Ld 1 T r r .•� .: .1 t Ll jr • • �.� L}� % 1 • / • • R'4'� . •. , • I • , �� •, . wl a 40 ' A4 -4 fil L ,___ AWT 't sO �• s t • • 1• �' . i •� 1 � � I .� •F 1 i � 4 1 1 W • M � • t , J � . •':EX�ST�NG • FA X•. . j� � v I • v p. • r HIGHWAY 36 rROPGSED- I J i, - , 41 • 01 f► � •• : o METALS +� See • SHERREN • ft- 46 r - �• 4% >- lu All A& 7i 4 U 11t M_ W-�&% rw 0 P EL el f 1 40 40 • 1 4 t 9 1 04 1 1 i ' 4 '. • _jL-.r% ff W W Cell ml &Gag oqt a4 • ; t s ' 1 ele"lle 4 o4 •t � .� •�• •�, �.• •♦ '. • �� . f f .. � - .� � � j :J i .• i Lt . ' t 4 t �f. t.r• � .� � .!+ f .;•'l l .��' �1 � �: +z7-1 I t t t!+ 1. •• .S ,, w .. • •. • `0 4f •1 • • • 1. t 'A w AVE. 4,A 445 4 two: J �. i �d ~ •• •! i of i . +�' .� 1 'ij •. j 1i ►J�'� 4 �. { 1 Ld 1 T r r .•� .: .1 t Ll jr • • �.� L}� % 1 • / • • R'4'� . •. , • I • , �� •, . wl a 40 ' A4 -4 fil L ,___ AWT 't sO �• s t • • 1• �' . i •� 1 � � I .� •F 1 i � 4 1 � i � t , X•. . j� � v I PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 9 attachment two 4 N SITE PLAN 6 CIO I attachment three 4 N wy 36 e, 50"L ID o H i 1� —0 Zb�,�t�Lq �a,yTrews � 3 + Btw'fi �-- lAzl 0. t S 3` 13 3 w 0 0 eCL rew VON iioy SITE PLAN 6 CIO I attachment three 4 N September 17, 1984 - - -_ - - City of Maplewood 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, AEI 55109 Subject: Proposed Sign Location East of English Street., south side of Highway 36, just east of railroad location within 500' of a residence. Billboard Ordinance,Section 36 -292, Paragraph C, for special use permit. Nearest edge of sign will be 475 from a residence and 440' from a residential district. We feel the sign location would be feasible due to trees on the north. side of Cope Avenue which. will block out sign from residents living on the south side of Cope Avenue, east of railroad tracks. Refer to the attached photos. This should not create any hardship or hazard for residents on the south side of Cope Avenue. We also feel that your sign ordinace is very restrictive and just about prohibits billboards , per Sign Ordinance, Section 36-292, paragraphs 1,2, &3. Attached are photos taken from the south side of Cope Avenue showing trees which block out sign location. Directly across from our proposed sign location on the north side of Highway 36 is a Farvue billboard. Billboards are a commercial - business and should be allowed in a commercial or industrial district. Properties east, west, north and south of proposed sign location are zoned M -1. ` Yours truly, NATIONAL ADVERTISING C MPANY Gerald Osterloo 242 17th Street Ames, IA 50010 Attach. 7 attachment four Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of � . 1984 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the 3M National Advertising Company initiated a conditional use permit to erect a billboard at the following - described property: That part of the North 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of Section 10, Township 29, Range 22, lying west of a line parallel with and 233.3 feet west of the West line of the East 39 acres and lying east of the Northern Pacific railroad right -of -way and lying south of Highway 36 and north of Cope Avenue WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 10 This conditional use permit was initiated by 3M National Advertising Company, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Communit y Design Review Board on November 13, 1984. The community design review board recommended to the city council that said permit be - 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing.on 198 Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and.present written statements. The council also considered r eports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings-of-fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter., 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be. compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 50 The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to P resent and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run-off, vibration, g 9 eneral unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. R attachment five K Y 60 The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe. access or arkin needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. P 9 70 The use would be serviced by essential publ is services, such as streets, P olice, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks, 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at P ubl is cost. for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design lid. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 11. The proposed billboard would be adequately screened from the homes along Cope Avenue by the existing trees on the billboard site . Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Adherence to the site plan, dated October 16, 1984, unless a change is approved by the city's community design review board. 20 The typical requirement for periodic review of this permit shall be waived. Council review of this permit shall take place only if a problem with the sign develops. Adopted this day of , 1984. Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS . ) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of 1984 with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the_ same relates to a conditional use permit. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1984. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 9 S 000, C Action by Council: r Endorse Modified... ReJ ecte rl,._.r._. -. Date MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand - - Associate Planner SUBJECT: Storage Space Variance LOCATION: Beebe Road. APPLICANT: Town Home Investment Company, Inc. OWNER: Donald. F. and Carole V. Pal me PROJECT: Westwi nds of Maplewood DATE: November 28,1984 SUMMARY Request Approval of a variance to the ordinance requiring 120 cubic feet of extra storage space to be provided for each unit within the main b u i l d i n g . The applicant i s 'propos i ng this storage space, but in the garages. Refer to the letter on page 8. Comments It is important for renters to have some additional storage space ,available i n addition to closet space. This would be provided by the applicant. However.-these storage lockers would be within the garages and not the main building as code requires. To approve a variance, state law requires that these findings be made: I. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The applicant has explained in his letter that there is a hardship based on floor plan design.. Providing this storage space in the main building would result in the apartments not having the benefit of as much "livable" floor space. The only problem with placing these lockers in the garage is the inconvenience in having to go to the garage for a stored item. Recommendation Adoption of the resolution on page 9 approving. a variance to permit the storage .1 ockers in the garage rather than the main buildings at the Westwi nds of . Maplewood on the basis that: a. The spirit and intent of the ordinance would The met since the . storage space would be provided. b. Locating the storage lockers in the garage permits a better use of the floor space within the main building. BACKGROUND Site Description 1. Site size: 2.65 acres 2. Existing land use: undeveloped Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: undeveloped land planned RM, medium density residential and zoned R -3, multiple dwelling residential. Southerly: City of Mapl ewood water booster station and Del grey Waterproofing Easterly: a single dwelling on 4.16 acre lot. This property is zoned F, farm residential and planned RM. Westerly: Mounds Park Accademy - Past Actions 9-19-65: Council rezoned this site from F to R-3. 6- 12 -84: The community design revi ew board conditionally approved plans for two eight -unit condominium b u i l d i n g s on this site, which were proposed by the applicant. This plan was dropped by the applicant. 11- 27 -84: The . Community Design Review Board recommended approval of this variance and conditionally approved design plans. -2- PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 1. Land use plan designat,on: RM medium density residential 2. Zoni R - 3 3 r Secti 36 - 110 r e q uires res a minimum of 120 cubic feet of miscellaneous . eq storage space shall be made available in each multiple dwell • ' for e dwell unit within the same bu, l di ng constructed � n the city � i n addition l i n unit is located* Such storage area shall be such dwelling to the normal closet space that is in the dwelling u nit. • b ( 6) 4 . Section. 367.10 Su bd, v i s i on of the state law requires that the 9 following findings be made before a variance can be granted: • would cause undue hardship because of a. Strict enforcement .. i circumstances unique i ue to the property under consideration c q b. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance* �� ....,.a ; � ^ ^nnecti nn with the granting of a Undue hardship as u�C� ��� �� v ariance ance means the property in question cannot be put to a . • ' f used under conditions allowed by the official al reasonable use , controls. The plight of the landowners is due to c ircumstances ' h is p roperty, not created by the l and the unique to h 9 variance, if ranted, will not alter the essential _c haracter of the locali - Procedure _- 1. Recommendation b y the Review Board on the variance. 2. Public hearing n g and decision by the City Council Attachments: 1. Location map 20 Property line/zoning map 3. Site plan 4. Storage locker plan 5 pP Applicant's letter date- stamped 10 -23 -84 6. Resolution •- 3 - 1ERREN AVE % , EN AVE. AVE OPE AVE. LARK AVE .ARK AVE CURlEit RD. _ LAVRtE. RO i ayE 65 N INUR 0 O 21 � .V� } 9 KE L A ,./ AVE. �• �MAR�wvt�0 (1) STANICH CT. 3 PUBLIC WORKS v J W s AVE. W ` BLDG. N AD AVE. NA R13 WOO A os 1 AVE. ' A RY UAN �t 29 68 1 28 H o L Low AY 5 3 0- . • ..: .. ... .:Q W � < W O ♦• c 5 a _ uQu Z RI PLEY AVE. 'c - - .8 TLE Wokelie /gaff a < Lost e a � 29 . _ 3 z ..1 PRICE s aV z AV RP NT UR 64 �I ~ 65 ST. PAUL W TlfNOMW t.J dc 14 _ o � Sn';;i ;JRS1 aR. G,H - 4 s z _ SH L01 1 6.A RD . K - 2 0 MONTANA AVE. S* ABLE ST. D-4 W SEV tNTH ST. K,L :SE XI ANT AVE H - ISH7 AVE G,1 -4 440 N.' 1 f - 5 a C.. ,t.YrR AVE. 4 N 6 LOCATION MAP _4_ Attachment One D) 40 its M r . s � O • r`6' r lk 1 R, • B e e GQ r , • .� . �' t ar •�.� f • s ,o 75 t to o. 1 • _ •, .�. � �., ,..mot 4 � -' X # - - � - - -- Doe i t ic t mow • � C , ` ` �` , •�^ r •�` PO • r -' t. IV) z ; A • T +fib �• lt.�- s.� ✓y �: �•+ �� • 1. 2 ` • • ♦ • • S 9 J • .•• PROPERTY. LINE /ZONING MAP "a 5 .. Attachment Two 4 N L) tAj 11 'O . cn U - all z asr Ul N tIL i co o ow • r r Z f CL ,, o C . cr CL r « # 11 PAY- 01-1 q& •_ ..� ! • 0 IL Q L i ` r • U OD Z t. .� s . -- ' • is � _ � .. . it • - / �. _ o j . w40 ;� •• ; i 0 Cj) . LJJ no • •• W ,L' lu ' • � .� • 1. � Z It �Il • • dk • • • J A•1 it �Gf /� • w J.r'/' At J dw/-t.XF or* A /•/ I 0 romw 0 owl rI ATTACHMENT THREE cf 71 AM (a w hirU�.1r tt. o . �,.. A 40wmAJ , 0 50WR IT A RpC & dpSom 5 t z�• 4- T (fir ye..) � �'er� Li.►t.►�+O�t 40LT'J' M c� ��- o,�.�.c,.,t. 'S*�.� •a� � 'STtie.�s�. t, � S♦,e �t •.C.� �- M yo PROPOSED STORAGE SPACE 7 ' ATTACHMENT FOUR 4 N VARIANCE RE QUEST STATEMENT We respectfully request that we be allowed to meet the City's residential unit storage requirement by locating separate storage rooms in the detached garage provided each uni t. The proposed garages are ove'rs .zed (26 ft. deep) and provide a larger than average parking stall in addition to a larger than required storage locker. Providing separate storage facilities within the building creates major design problems with unit floor glans and does not enhance the "liveability" of these 3 bedroom family units. Adequate closet space is provided each unit and should not be sacrificed to meet the present storage requirement. Granting this request will allow us to provide the most liveable square feet to tenants while providing them adequate, secure storage space. The storage space we propose is shown on the garage plans. ATTACHMENT FIVE g_ _ Pursuant to due call and notice thereof', a -regular meeting. of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held_ in the council chambers . in said . city on the day of , 1984 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Town Home Investment Company, Inc. applied for a variance for the following- described property: The West 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4, except the South 260 feet thereof, and also except the East 33 feet thereof, in Section 14, Tonwship 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. WHEREAS Section 36 -1141 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires that there be 120 cubic feet of storage space provded for each multiple dwelling unit within the main building;- WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing the storage spaces within the detached garages, requiring a variance ; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on October 23, 1984. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Community Design Review Board on November 27,1984. The board recommended to the city council that said variance be 30 The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on to consider this variance. Notice thereof was published.and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The spirit and intent of the ordinance would be met since the storage space would be provided. 2. Locating the storage lockers in the garage permits a better use of the floor space within the main building. Adopted this Seconded by day of 1 198 . Ayes. -- _ 9 _ Attachment a.1 x I I • y . • r STATE OF MINNESOTA ) r� ) COUNTY OF 'RAMSEY ) SS. ) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I , the undersigned, being the duly q u a l i f i e d and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the ,City of Maplewood, held on the day of 198 , with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this variance. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city th is day of , 1984. 1 I City Clerk City of Maplewood ' 10 _ � ... .. � ....- ... �nr. i'ww .vw. *.♦ .. '.i/O4rr•.�t. «. ..'1 s• ....i•+. .�3'�.. • ..a. •.ex;L.. w.... ..r..a.. e•�.::a ...rr 4� ..a..... .. wYl ^. r ... .. . . •-. .I:. r,._... ..� .. • .... .�_� ... - .. ♦.�i .. - '�•... .. .. .. - .. ... Action b y Cou- ricil: MEMORANDUM Endorsed_ Modified._.. Rejected___ • TO: City Manager Dat FROM: Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat LOCATION: Beebe Road APPLICANT. Townhome Investment Company, Inc. OWNER: Donald F. and Carole V. Palma PROJECT. Westwi nds of Maplewood DATE: November 13, 1984 SUMMARY Request Approval of a four-l multiple -dwelling plat. Proposal 1. Each lot would be virtually identical i n dimension and area. Their e area average g e would be 28,900 square feet. 2. There would be a four -unit apartment building, plus a four -car garage built on each lot, Review by the Communi Design Review Board is pending. 3. Each . apartment unit would have three bedrooms. Recommendation Approval of the Westwi nds of Maplewood preliminary plat for one year. BACKGROUND Site Description 1. Site size: 2.65 acres 2. Existing, land use: undeveloped Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: undeveloped land planned Rm, medium density residential and Zoned R -3, multiple dwelling residential Southerly: City of Maplewood water booster station and Delorey Waterproofing Easterly: A single dwelling on 4.16 acre lot. This property is zoned F. farm residential and planned Rm. Westerly: Mounds Park Academy Past Action 9-19-65 Council rezoned this site from F to R -3. C� The Community Design Review Board conditionally approved plans for , two ei ght- unit condominium buildings on this site, which were proposed by the applicant. DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Planning 1. Land Use Plan designation: Rm, medium density residential 2. Density: Permitted - -22 persons per net acre. Proposed - -19.92 persons net acre. t 3. Zoning: R -3, multiple dwelling residential 4. Section 36 -109 of the zoning code does not allow the open parking spaces in front of the garage doors, This is a site design concern, though that w i l l be considered by the Community Design Review Board. Pu bl i c Works Water and sanitary sewer are available. Procedure 1. Recommendation by the planning commission 2. Public hearing and decision by the city counci mb Attachments: 1. Location map 2. Property Line /zoning map 3. Westwi nds site plan and preliminary plat date - stamped 10 -23 -84 , j o • so ?; I lvfx ING IL lDlt._j 4 1 5 I L 16 • SHERREN AVEI A EN AvE. ;� AVE -� OPE AVE. :� LARK AVE LARK AVE ] 1-: 0 �mn — in z ILAURIE R0. z a: LLAURIEII RD i w z > W .� I SANJ21 z AVE. @ z 0 fA `: �j 25 z1so N AVE. 8U16KE AVE. r� �� AVE. (1) STANICH CT. PU BLIC WDRKS '� IT Ic AYE . 64 > BLDG. ;.� ; Ifa 4 0 9 1 AVE. NA ot Is Nos [WOOD) AVE. jtY N ORTH 4�' r , t��v p .� 29 V 28 68 1 HOLLOW ((Ay Loi .... .. ... :' it m 5 a 2 Wokefield Y AVIE ID R-1 tPLEY AVE. L J 1 --'U r, I . AW J KINGSTON E e 29 z z 3 z J [PRICE xAvz > AVE. LARP ENTEVR- nnF 65 ST., PAUL T29NR2tW I& LOCATION MAP 0' 11 4 C - CPU D) - ..0 400 y r, ARCHER HEIGHTS r APARTMENTS Vp VrN o - • . ... � • . ....ter - r ,.. ~ • • y � � � `� • � � ' ..ai 1 BeE DO arjcs ' tai C- ._ jig La Ll 1A m 1' v MOUNDS ,PARK ko ACADEMY _ ! iM 75 • • 2135 ��• Dar 9.o s �, � 1 � aC teS•µtod ` . _. City of Ma ew ('Lt a , umping Stati n V t • ' • t �. • `f • 1 + • ( ., • O9 - , 2147 ' - - ---,_. �a . , , - � ,5 •. . �3 o �' 121 ' • Vol s ; �i t i3: 1 Lti.r : b v�� �r t , PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 N -SITE DATA • SITE* GRADING 8 DR AINAGE P LAIV. ' " " " ' 's • TOW Lkwq 16 with- Landscaping WESTWINDS OF MAPLEWOOD 00"Ov Umft 5.9 •� PWA W- W~ 16 CITY O F MAPLEWOOD COUNTY OF RAMSEY ftrkift e"m 16 .-Totel ft*w4 32 (2 m fs"10 t * * 'a DE VEL O PER offf a 0 st A de swo of Jv 60 80 •........ OWNER Jur N r." SIA! TOWNHOME INVESTMENT CO. 1306 west Count Road F Arden Hills, MN 55112 T*1*~@1 494 -3244 B L 0 C K A"s • $& off oe j -J*vftvv-0 jbm~ ALJ --.00 *� f V - I. le IjA 4 3 1b. 0V *;VM ell ANO *'vV000,20dw Alm~mmw sohw &mr N r S- 0; Avg VA zt AV-1 SOMA" A-"%mw 4 i , PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ammtev to. me sentymem "0 O"t bell of the 1 pop .. . ..... t8w smorthe"t ~ er—emee" Um smuts taw 0 ma mom sweet the "et 31 feet ri m e' -- - • - • :0 &*NNW* camtv. mawqw-.8. 4L an . . ........ AAWAAV . es L SCALE- • 1*'-*20' r lol f . K . 7- ROAD E.G. RUD IR SONS IN' LAND SURVEYODS. LANDSCAPING DENNIS E BROWN. PE e••ft mar fte eme am afteps" er waso- -9 *~ seserg"mme 6" War I an 0 0.0 CIVIL ENGINEER vmmpmftx+ &"mom• anew 00 "me of me 100" of 1posse&#. •,09 Ove•0 Ave *. • ., --�- 1•4h;41 tors. am ss"? 101960006 940-4VA hee fit -p 4 MEMORANDUM To: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT/OWNER: DATE, City Manager Associate Planner - - Johnson Zone Change (R -1 to R-2) 2520 Clarence Street Ronald D. Kelly November 13 1984 SUMMARY Request Action by Council: Endo_rz e Yfo dif i Rejected Date _ A zone change from R -1, single dwelling to R -2, double dwelling to convert a single dwelling to a double dwelling. Proposal 1. The upper and lower levels of this bi -level - dwelling would be used as separate housekeeping units. 2. One or both units would be rented The owner has not decided whether they would continue to live in the dwelling once converted. 3. The driveway and garage are adequate to provide the required four off- street parking spaces. 4. The upstairs unit would have two bedrooms and contain about 1050 square feet. The lower unit would have two bedrooms and contain about 950 square feet of area. These floor areas substantially exceed the minimum required floor areas. 5. All of the remodeling would be to. the interior. The exterior appearance of the dwelling would continue to be that of a typical single dwelling. Comments OWN- This request is consistent with the intent of the land use plan to permit an occasional double dwelling in areas planned for -residential lower density use. The request also satisfies the findings required to approve a zone change. This proposal also presents less of a compatibility issue than two other R -1 to R -2 rezoning requests that were recently approved by council, In both of these other cases, typical twin -home style double dwellings were approved for construc- tion in areas similar to this. Recommendation Approval of the enclosed resolution (page 13), approving a zone change from R -1 to R -2 for 2520 Clarence Street, on the basis that this - structure, once converted to a double dwelling, would continue to be compatible with nearby single dwellings because: 1) the exterior of the structure would continue to be that of a typical single dwelling, 2) any increased traffic would be negligible, 3) the City of Coon Rapids has documented that a double dwelling located within a single -- dwelling neighborhood does not devalue area proper t i es -, and 4) the exterior of the structure consists of low maintenance materials which are consistent with the HRA' s recommended policy for approval of rental structures. 2 BACKGROUND Site Descr Size: 31,416 square feet or .72 acres, with 102 feet of frontage xistin land use: Bi -level style, single dwelling and a two -car Existing attached ara ached e. The dwelling has a foundation area of 1092 square g feet. i t was constructed in 1974 and , has a low - maintenance stucco and brick exterior. Surrounding Land Uses N orth and south: single dwellings on larger lots East: railroad right -of -way West. Clarence Street. Across . the street are single dwellings and a city-owned pond i ng area . Past Actions Council has recently approved two R - 1 to R - 2 rezonings for properties fron 'n on a local street in a single - dwelling neighborhood. They are 2- 27 -84: A Y request b Richard Miller for the property northwest of Fenton � Avenue and ,Jackson Street* ( See the map on page 7 e) 8- 13 -84: z ocki for a property request by Russell Nie on Farrell Street, south g P. P of Margaret Avenue. (See the map on page 8. ) Planning 1. Land Use Plan des i g nation: RL, residential lower density 2. Zoning: Present - R -1, single dwelling Proposed - R -2, double dwelling 3. policies from the Plan (pages 18-29)e The R1 class i f icati on is primarily designated for a variety of single dwelling homes. An occasional double dwelling may be allowed. 4. Compliance with land use laws: Section 36 -485 requires four findings to approve rove a zone change. Refer to the resolution on page Doug 5. Holtr with the City of Coon Rapids' assessor's office, conducted a study from 1970 to 1982 that documents that property values negatively ne are not ativel affected when a double dwelling is located in a single-dwelling le- dwellin neighborhood. See the attached study (page 10) . • he Ramsey Count assessor's office, stated that 6, Rick Simmer, with t y Y one d ouble dwelling laced among single dwellings would not depreciate the value of the single dwellings. 3 7. According to the real estate market analyst firm of Maxfield and Solomonson, "Maplewood needs to provide approximately 95 to 100 rental units per year through 1990 to meet its own .growth needs." Public Works Sanitary sewer is available. Building Official . r1 �■ rrrrrl���■rr� All building code requirements can be. complied with if the structure is remodeled to contain two separate housekeeping units. Citizen Comm Nine of sixteen property owners within 200 feet of this property signed the petition (page 9), endorsing I approval of this request. Seventeen property owners within 350 feet of this property were surveyed by staff for their opinion of the proposal. Nine persons responded to the questionnaire: four had no comment and five were opposed on the basis that 1. Approval would set a precedent for additional conversions in the neighborhood. 2. Area property values would decrease. 3. Rental properties are prone to being eyesores due to lack of maintenance. 4. Traffic would be increased. Proce 1. Planning commission recommendation 2. City council decision following a public hearing jw Attachments 1. Location map 2. Property line /zoning map 3. Fenton Street rezoning map 4. Farrell Street rezoning map 5. Peti tion 6. Special sale studies 7. Resolution 4 .• ti Zf , R 3 ( + (6C) R2 . F F . F MI R F M l SIC C/TY OF Ka WE da Ml T At R o e + 4v s F o ( F M R R s A . 1r R ` ,/ R COUkTY R R RQ i "ME — . _.. . ti i� F � • N R • PUp F R . 6 ' R § - I F Ml F f Esc J� R Y F F 1 111 OEM R W (R2) t Lac M I � •.R R R \ � L....•+. �..�. t l SEffTA t )' \ z Ln M� ' R 3 z R _ M I Ml Ml Mt GRA►�pv w F ,, 1 4 M � R i TRUNK ww — F MI C MI • tFt-3C ' • . � R = •Q F y COUNTY � 1 R R or • ~ NA ©� T • D , ] 1 R A "8" R E r ° • E R R D D � • ._. • E WE R3 A R R ,; F R A _ � . 4 KLMON 9�a"L� AVE 44T ' ' -- ft w F R 2 R • 4n • -� ♦ Q r , O M►OOC 0 AVE or 2 R2 R W F ' L8C AVE 8 r . _. „.. L4 KL 4n • 8C ` L.. • , r F 4 •R :° R LA3 t R F r' d R R or Ss,E R2Lv F. R A3 f, v C 1 8 C M r QKE , �°1'Y.QLEN . , F f r-- i---•r F I `' L. I. F �� R ®��1 o R A I� LOCATION MAP* 4 N 5 Attachment 1 7 1 •• -•.- ''` ,- eta • � :. •: _. ..� or Woe • J 40 r I So I . L � +r '•� ,••••.•� Y• - • •N -' _ _�.. � .. - d•f^ ..• .• � ' jJ •a• j � r. ?'.`� i• � .' •t .r F . �► : � • -_ -`.. .> . ., : .f 0 - .. . � - ; . - - • � - `, ' _ . mom Jo 2559 OL now So 3 • _ � s . .� 1 , s .. • te i� f.� �. - • - - C: �� - 3 . -,, t :.f.' ' •�� 49. 2530 .r w- �at • . ~ ` fa• Am as .- %► ... - � •• • 8 � fir• +... � i • .rte � -� '� • � • ,� � •• '.•- •� • � •. � • =: t • • 1 2520 -- 3"s lot - _ , - v •. _. �* 251 - - SAL �;- -. � - � � - +_• - - "', - -�. ` .,'a � ,rob ac - - •. •_ � � �`[ s• l •• - Y • •j , - ` V. .r . -`*• • 'ate' 50O , -'...' - ♦ .. r' •. _ _ - <-►, .•. • .: it % � -y tea• .• _ •4.`� - •+ - ••• -►, .�. •� • � .__ .- �_ _. c •� , .4•' ., � - _ -••. ' .' _.• as _ � j _ jj�� �: � y ' i � � fir • a • J , i •t • 2.�! /� e ` !� v '+ � y • lot Nei Ab Al of f '► .ter♦ ,a .' . ►, Y ' 1 ra �. • • 1- ' : .�_ 1. i . 1 . •.. •� ♦ i •+ �.. + a ,• t �� * - s a "+•:f�•r - y'. • r. �� �e ` j • 2470 ; • t d, ✓.+ r •• r SEEM •+.+j'_- r _• r .r-., - 1 . •• .� • ir ,• y ,• ;•' t.� t • ••..- .f - a � _ +�: f . i• • _ .. , •' �. S - _ - ... ' now •aaat aaaaat faaw MW Arr ate � ' • .. , , '' l "^ w r ` • _ � • Y +tip �♦ r _ �. • - ♦ ' t.�•r' �+ . j, - f • .. y ', • + T' .. ; • • . ♦ . ♦ +- •• •' - . j � •! -•.� •�..- • -�� .. tT•:•', -• `".� •,� • .i • ~••.. • ��, .� � ♦_.• •. r .� .' .. ^�• ,r.• : '. •r. 1 , - j S'`� • •4 .s.''a� .fi - . �,• ,. .-� - ) • = •� •• •- - p..' -f..• .... 't '• ..� •'• �. �� •'�- • ~ f' • r~i.. '�•� {+• �•.1' r i r: f. .n, ,:- •'• •• r lam'• •r "' ._t. -. r.r►r. •ai ► 1.. .Jt ,• _ .. , ._ .'wr ... PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 6 Attachment 2 4 N 1 • 1 . / - �• . . f IL w Ilop / <� kw IND --�' f Ir IW Oil 01 87 310 R --- - - - - -- - - - -_ -- - - - - ---, � 866 18 � 1 Cr 4- 1870 1131 1211 860 85 1 =— `�' • 852 .� 18 3- 63 Am&- Q- -- 1844 - f6 t 1 [] 1838 - 1835 w �� •1825 j r . 1. 4 • FENTUN STREET R -1 to R -2 Reao.ni ng 2 -27-84 7 attachment 3 Q N ,.•,,.,.,,,,.,,,� _ ..._•......- ....�.�..� .�._.. _ ...�... A - ._.{�_ . mow.. �._ _ ...._..._ . ..,....� _ �....... ...ri.,i .�.� -- ..�... -•� ---T 1 T ...�. .,,... .T „� 1 • - -- - - - - -- I— — o .r3 I la t t I t 1 � I f■ � �. f a i 1 � t S Off lw - 1 AVM 17 z t 13 a t i .•�- _�� �.i fir. w. ��. ws d w N i 1.3 113 i .? :,t f. , • S hoc �► I� , t o0 3 13 4 n I lift 13 • ! 1 _ �. �.�� �.� .�_ r �� w� • fir • t t AVE . Qft aft! MMMWOL- low f .r � ._.. - ....._ rte... � � 'r - � � � ' � � � `� � -► r` o v • 1 • t7 i Z e 4 AV& 0 FARRELL STREET R -1 to R -2 Rezoning e -13 -84 8 Attachment 4 4 N CITY OF MAPLEWOOD REZONING We'-petition the Maplewood City ounci 1 to rezone the attached-described property from i ' to 2 �� The written signature of any person's name on thi s petition is indication of that person's understanding of the proposed zone, the proposed location and an endorsement for approval of such change. SIGNATURE PRINT NAME b&l d 0� - or Af ABSTRACT LIST NO. 0 9 Attachment 5 COON RAPIDS . SPECIAL SALE STUDIES Many times in the past the statement has been made b various .slow or that a Y us people that "If that double bungalow apartment or that home occupation is allowed it will have a detrimental effect on m property l� Y P P y va 1 ue , More often than not this type of statement is made b the abutting owner or the owner across Y 1 nS property the street and the immediate assumption is that the new proposed use will cause his property alue to d ecline. ecllne. In order to accurately determine if the above statements were .true our off is year again conducted some rather comprehensive a this p ensive sales. studies to check the market behavior. In order to arrive at a meaning • g ul conclusion several guidelines were set as follows: 1. All the sales that occurred in 1977 and 1978 were used. 2. All sales were compared to our 1979 estimated market values, . ues . 3 . Abutting properties for double bungalows, duplexes and home occupations are defined as those properties along side across the street and behind the subject � property while-in the apart- ment. study all properties within 350 feet of the subject were used. 4. The abutting property sales and their ratios to our values were compared -to similar but non- abutting property sales and their ratios to our values. 5. All comparables were to properties within the immediate area. On the following page is a summary of the comprehensive stud out • y lining the number of subject properties in each study, the number of abut • the number of sales in 1977 and 1 tang .properties, 978 and the total sales, the combined ratio of sales to our value and the corresponding combined ratios of sales of our values of the surrounding. area. While individual areas ma show a fluctuation of ratios especially when only one or two sales are involved • the composite overall difference is so small that the only conclusion that again _gain can be reached is that the presence of these uses do not affect the a butting property values as of this date. 10 Attachment 6 TOTAL COMBINED.RATIO* RATIO* OF • PROPERTIES OF ADJACENT $OLD SURROUNDING SOLD PROPERTIES AREAS k 47 .954 .963 estimated Apartments 20 200 '18 30 48 .952 9947 Home Occupations 21 215 13 13 26 .969 o955 * Ratio of Assessers Value Actual Sales Price NO , 'OF NO. OF PROPERTIES PROPERTIES PROJECTS ABUTTING SOLD SOLD TYPE OF USE STUDIED PROPERTIES IN 1976 IN 1977 Duplex & Double Bungalows 47 256 21 26 TOTAL COMBINED.RATIO* RATIO* OF • PROPERTIES OF ADJACENT $OLD SURROUNDING SOLD PROPERTIES AREAS k 47 .954 .963 estimated Apartments 20 200 '18 30 48 .952 9947 Home Occupations 21 215 13 13 26 .969 o955 * Ratio of Assessers Value Actual Sales Price NO OF NO. OF PROPERTIES PROPERTIES TOTAL COMBINED RATIO OF SUBJECT ABUTTING SOLD SOLD PROPERTIES RATIO OF SOLD SURROUNDING TYPE OF USE STUDIED PROPERTIES IN 1977 IN 1978 SOLD PROPERTIES AREAS Duplexes & Doub le Bungalows 89 356 27 23 50 0991 .988 t Estimated Apartments 24 200 31 34 65 .981 9975 Home Occupations 23 210 14 12 26 .954 .960 v Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the counci 1 chambers in said city on the day of 1984 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Ronald.D. Kelly initiated 'a rezoning from R -1, residence district (single dwelling) to R -2, residence district (double dwelling) for the following - described property: West 725 feet of the South 112 feet of the North 1389 feet of part of the NW 1/4 West of the NPRR right-of-way in Section 10, Township 29, Range 22. This property is also known as 2520 Clarence Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by Ronald D. Kelly, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances., 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on November 19, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be 3. The Maplewood City Counci 1. held a public hearing on 1984 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were ..given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change i s consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded,, .3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare. 13 Attachment 7 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. 5o This structure f , once converted to a double d w e l l i n g , would continue to be compatible with nearby single dwellings because: ao the exterior of the structure would continue to be that of a typical single dwelling, b. any increased traffic would be negligible, C. the City of Coon Rapids has documented that a double dwelling located within a single- dwelling neighborhood does not devalue area properties, and do the. exterior of the structure consists of low mainten- ance materials which are consistent with the ' HRA' s recommended policy for approval of rental structures. Adopted this day of , 1984. Seconded by Ayes- - STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk , `of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of , 1984, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this rezoning request. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 19849 City Clerk City of Maplewood. 14 T0: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: OWNER: DATE: MEMORANDUM Action by Council, Endor e, Mod-if iod City Manager Rejected Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner. Date Robert J. Wenger -- Environmental Health Official Kennel Permit 1231 E Shryer Avenue Marion F. Newbauer November 30, 1984 On Wednesday, November 28, 1984, an inspection was made of the dog kennel at the above address. The ' kennel was found to be free of any odor or noticeable mess, The five -foot minimum rear yard setback is being met. The sideyard setback could not be determined, since there were no visible lot stakes. Mr. Newbauer could not verify if the kennel was five feet from the side lot line. He explained, though, that he constructed the kennel thriteen years .ago on an existing slab and felt that it would be accepteable there since there was previously a building in that spot. Until June 5, 1980,it was permissible by code to have an accessory building within one foot of a side lot line if the building was twenty feet or more behind the house. On this basis, the kennel location is "grandfathered" in. me: 1,F t MEMORANDUM Action b E li d, rj TO: Mayor & Ci•ty Counci 1,��� FROM: Barry R. Evans, City Manager SUBJECT: Park Land Purchase from School Board DATE: December 3, 1984 You will recall that some time ago you authorized me to negotiate with the School Board to purchase a piece of land which includes part of the parking lot at the Goodrich field. This, was desirable, inasmuch as the School Board was selling the old Hillside School to Mounds Park Academy and if action had not been taken the aarcel in question would also have been sold. A price of $7,500 for the parcel has been deemed an equitable figure, and I would recommend that you authorize s i gni nq of a !purchase agreement I•n addition, we will need an appropriation' of $7,500 from P.A.C. funds . BRE :1 nb �• ,'y* •./ ••'M `. •L��w•, '7 '� i t • •; Kr M• •�.•. YJr •/ ���,• AL, • �r • ••� a,. -r,�'� I • of a IL or iry • .r . • '. . �, � � 'i•' .w r ,• � � i III��� A• '► • r 1 'K • 1' � �• i % ♦ � � � .V w � 1��Q � .•` : may ♦ r J' j;'. 1a. �,, '.•.•. i 'i f•,,'. • •j •.- '�,•, . °.. thl 40 i Ol 'Umn st IV or VL Xy IL IL Oak AV q r r 'Q la. 1 �p le b r ?, • t 3 pUV• �g3 MAlb -11I mossm law /010I ... k, PA *4k# K t �,I r o o� s �W P A -15'x { � � f Ki� lit • � li �j Z• • .A% IC ll 1 • • s A • H� • ,s ir /010I ... k, PA *4k# K t �,I r o o� s �W P A -15'x { � � f Ki� lit • � li �j Z• • .A% IC i a Izy TO: FROM: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: DATE MEMORANDUM �c) City Manager Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner Code Amendment -- Swimming Pools Northern States Power Company (NSP) November 14, 1984 rl Request A mend the swimming pool setback requirements from utility lines. NSP is req uesting that Mapl ewood' s . ordinance . be changed to match the . requirements of the National Electrical Code and the Na q tional Electrical Safety Code. Reason for the Change The National Electrical and the National Electrical Safety Code have established minimum utility line clearances from pools for safety. These must be followed by electricians and the utility company, as the applicant's letter states on page 3 Maplewood's code, which is more restrictive, should be amended to conform to these regulations. There is no reason why Maplewood's requirements should be more restrictive. This only tends to make pool ' placement acement more difficult for the homeowner and creates confusion as to what specific pool clearances should be applied. Because of P eriodic electrical code changes, the ordinance should . require P uire com liance with the two electrical codes to avoid future discrepancies. Recommendation page g of the ordinance on a e 5 amending the utility line clearances from swimming pools to match the requirements of the National Electrical Code and the National Electrical Safety Code. BACKGROUND Current Ordinance .Section 31 -5 (2) requires that "pools shall not be located beneath overhead utility lines, over underground utility lines of any t e or yP w* lth i n f i f teen feet of any such utility lines, Past Action 10- 21 -71: The swimming pool ordinance . was .adopted Procedure 1. Recommendation by the planning commission 2. First reading by the city council 3 Second reading and decision by the city council )c Attachments: 10 Applicant's letter dated 8 -10 -84 20 Criteria from the NSP Co. electric 30 Ordinance amendment I 2 Mr Tom Ekstrand Associate Planner City of Maplewood 1902 E County Road B Maplewood MN 55109 Dear Sir: The City of Maplewood has a swimming pool ordinance that has been in effect for a number of years. This ordinance was developed before the National Electrical Code or the National Electric Safety Code current rules went into effect. At the present time the rules in the National Electric Code (which electricians must follow) and the National Electric Safety Code (which utilities must follow) have the same standards . These standards have been set to insure that no .person while in or near the pool or cleaning the pool can come in contact with . utility wires. The rules specify dis-- P Y tances from. water level, edge of water surface, diving plat - form and diving tower, We request that the wording in 31 -5(2) be changed. to: Utility lines must be located in such a manner to conform to the National Electrical Code and National Electrical Safety Code. Please remove the words: Pools shall not be located beneath the overhead utility lines nor over the underground utility lines of any type or within fifteen (15) feet of any such utility lines. Your uly, EPH A LADNER, PE Distribution Engineering Manager Lakeland Division JAL /r 3 attachment one 1 B g g I A A A 10' . �''' - - -•-- 10' �� • �� `ice POOL CLEARANCES Over Pools • Service drop conductors shall not extend over (1) pools, (2) diving structures, (3) observation stands, towers or platforms, or the area extending 10 feet horizontally from the inside of the walls of the pool. EXCEPTION: Structures listed in (1), (2) and (3) above shall be permitted under.utility- owned, - operated and - maintained supply lines or service drops where such installations provide the following clearance: Triplex Conductors Open Wire Conductors Voltage to Ground Voltage to Ground 0 -150 Volts 0 -15 kV 15-50 kV A. Clearance in any direction to 18 ft. 25 ft. 27 ft. the water level, edge of water surface, base of diving plat- form or permanently- anchored raft B. Clearance in any direction to 14 ft. 16 ft. 18 ft. the diving platform or tower Wherever practical, the installation should provide for greater clearances than given above. Proper clearances over other obstructions not mentioned above may be • ascertained by inquiry of the Company. (Also, see drawing, Page 45, for ground clearance to residential premises.) Underground Wiring Location Underground Wiring shall not be permitted under the pool or under the area extending 5 feet horizontally from the inside wall of the pool. The term "pool" as used in this section shall include swimming, wading, and perma- nently installed therapeutic pools. 23 From the Northern States Power Company's Electric Service Information handbook 4 attachment two ORDINANCE.NO, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING UTILITY LINE CLEARANCES FROM SWIMMING POOLS THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Secti 1. Section 31 -5 (2) is amended as follows (add itions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): (2) Pools s a -1-- - t-- be- -�aega t -ecJ --ben a -t4-- &ver4ie ad-- u- ���3- t- �- ��-�s, r�ele- r-g-r-e -- et44 - L --1- yes -- a -f -- a-rty --t- e-- ar-- w4- t4t- i- n-- f4-f-te +.I feet --er f -vrn -- sire * -et -1 4 -34 n e-s-.- must be located to conform to , the utility line clearances required b the National Electrical Co e and the National Electrical Safety Code, Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Council t day of , 1984. Mayor Attest: Clerk Ayes -� Nays -- 5 attachment three f � MEMORANDUM Action b• Coon • l y cal, TO City Manager FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson Endorsed SUBJECT: Code Amendmen (Fences odified......._..,.,�.. } APPLICANT: City of Maplewood Rejected DATE : November 30, 19 8 4 Date SUMMARY Request 1. Revise the code to prohibit structural supports on the outside of boundary fencing (council proposal), 2. Combine the es•senti,ally duplicate Sections 9 -3 and 36 - 20 of city code. Section 36 -20 of the zoning code would be rescinded (staff proposal) 3. Expand the code to address the issues of barbed -wire fences and fence maintenance ( staff proposal), Reason for the Request On November 26, 1984, council initiated this code amendment in response to a request from Mr. Larry Benson at 1.800 City Heights Drive, Mr. Benson's neighbor to the north (1888 City Heights Drive) had constructed a fence with the supports to the outside, partially enclosing his rear yard. When staff investigated the complaint, it was realized that the literal language of the present code only requires the supports to be on the inside when a fence "surrounds an entire lot or tract." Comments The intent of the last sentence of. Section 9 -3 appears to be to require the structural supports to be on the inside. However the first sentence of the section speaks only to fences that "surround an entire property in the city for the • purpose of enclosing the lot or tract." The proposed revision would clarif y t his ambiguity as well as bring the code into conformance with customary practice. The supports should be on the inside as a courtesy to abutting property owners. Expansion of the fence code to deal with the maintenance and barbed -wire issues is proposed, because these items are not clearly addressed elsewhere in city code. - Occasionally, comp- P laints and questions are received regarding each of these items. Recomme ndation (At least four votes in favor are required for approval.) Approval of the enclosed ordinance. 0 mb Attachment Ordinance ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE REGULATING FENCES THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 36 -20 is hereby rescinded: Fences bordering a property in the city for'the purpose of enclosing the lot or tract shall be limited to a maximum height of six (6) feet for residential uses and ten (10) feet for nonresidential uses. Such fences shall be subject to determination by the building inspector as to whether the portion of fence which on the front yard thirty (30) foot setback area of the site constitutes an impairment to clear vision for traffic purposes or impairs the view from neighboring properties in such a manner as to constitute a so- called "spite fence." In any case of obstruction to vision affecting traffic in the public street or from neighboring properties, the height shall be only such as is determined by the building inspector to be acceptable. In making such determination, the building inspector may request advice and information from both the city engineer, the police chief or persons representing these officials, and their opinion shall be given in writing to the building inspector to be retained by him as part of his permanent record. Section 2. Section 9 -3 is hereby amended as follows (language to be deleted is crossed out, the proposed language follows the language to be deleted) : Section 9-3 Fences . Fa n s , a 3 rn pe�ty ar - Yrc i a i�f. r . fi e - -purpose f --�nc 1 o s % ng--t -- -- -vim- -� t �.l.l be 1 mited_.to_a- -maxi bj-ect } ate-- d-jj t -a r rn rti -�s ---b mpa- i -r-men t tv- c ---v n n �► -r--1�� ' r os 4 r t G Vi ow fr ^m na � 1�1� n ► r • area can reasona..e ' c ".c ' s f.fe ct i-ng -- traffic in the ht WX .fie se f . ar . 8; e-- --� Ste$-- be ---ca n sir - --=-moo m a w A fence that is within four feet of a property line shall be subject to the following restrictions: 1. Fences shall have a maximum height of six feet for residential and ten feet for nonresidential uses, 2. A fence "in a front yard that is at least 80% opaque must ►......,.... . ... ...... ... .. ^.....w ... ..... - a...S.e.» . s ... w r ,. .......r... ..- ... .. -- - y,y„e.wrr:aAr .....1 sV'" . w ... . o- 1 ...... _._ .. ... a .. . a be approved by the director of community development if it is visible from an adjacent dwelling. The .director may r approve the fence if it does not signif icantly impair the view of an adjacent dwelling. 3. A fence is subject to Article v, Chapter 29 of the city's Code of Ordinances (Sight obstructions at Inter- sections). 4. The structural supports shall not be on the outside of a fence, facing the adjacent property. 5. Barbed -wire fencing shall be prohibited except in a F., farm residence district, where livestock is being raised. 6. Fences shall be constructed and maintained in a workmanlike manner. 7. The city ,council may approve variations to this ordinance after notifying the adjacent owner (s) at least ten days before a meeting. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Council on , 19 Mayor Attest: Ayes— City Clerk Nays -- Action by Council: .1�,3 s MEMORANDUM Endorse .__- .._..�. Modified...... TO: City Manager ReJected..._. Di rector of Community Devel o ment Date FROM: p SUBJECT: Code Amendment -- Setbacks and Lot Dimensions DATE: November 7. 1984 Request The city-councils on September 24, initiated an amendment to allow additions to existing single dwellings in required setbacks without having to approve a variance, It was suggested at a planni commission meeting that l divisions be included as well, Reason for the Request In order to. approve a variance, state law requires that council must fund an undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individ- ual property. (See background information.) This is a difficult finding to make. Undue hardship means "the property in question cannot be put , a reasonable use i used under conditions allowed by the official control A strict interpretation of this law could find that no variance for a house addition is justified, since the property already has a house and that is a reasonable use of. the property. This ordinance allows a lot or building to use the predominate lot area, lot width or setback, if it is 1 ess than the code requirement. This avoids having to make hardship findings through a variance and saves the homeowner and city the cost and time of an application. The code already allows this for front yard setbacks. This ordinance would also all ow a lesser lot.dimension or house addition into'.a minimum setback b conditional y use permit. _ Staff Recommendation Approval of the enclosed ordinance. HRA Recommendation Approval of the enclosed ordinance. BACKGROUND 1. Section 462.357, subd. 6 (2). of state statutes states the following: "To hear requests for variances from the literal provisions of the ordinance in instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the i ndi vi dual ro ert P P y under consideration, and to grant such variances only when it is demon- strated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner 'is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, w i l l not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. Undue hardship also includes, b.ut is not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in section 116J.06, subdivision 2, when in harmony with the ordinance. The board of appeals and adjustments or the governing body as the case may be, .may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under the ordinance for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or governing body as the case may be, may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one family dwelling as a two- family dwelling. The board or governing body as the case may be may impose conditions in the granting of variances to .insure compliance and to protect adjacent properties." 2. Section 36- 442(b) of city code states that: "Approval of a conditional use permit shall be based upon the following findings: (1) The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. (2) The establishment or maintenance of the use shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. . (3) The use shall be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. (4) The use shall not depreciate property values. (5) The use shall not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical - interference or other nuisances, (6) The use shall generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 2 (7) The use shall be served by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. (8) The use shall not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and shall not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. (9) The use shall preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the .development design. (10) The use shall cause minimal adverse environmental effects." jW Attachment ordinance I AN ORDINANCE REVISING THE MINIMUM SETBACKS, LOT AREA AND LOT FRONTAGE IN R -1 ZONES THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Sections 36 -69 through 36 -71 are hereby amended as follows (additi are underlined and deletions are crossed out) : Sec. 36 - 69. Lot dimensions. . Every hw44d4Rg des4gRed - and single dwelling erected in an R -1 Res4denee District, fer the- hews4 ef eRe -fam44 y 9 3 - e ther - w4th - 4ts ae eessery - bw44d4R9s shall be located on a building site of pet -4ess than at least ten thousand (10,000) square feet in area. The minimum width of the lot shall not be less than seventy -five (75 ) feet at the building setback line. No existing lot shall be subdivided unless all the resulting lots comply 4R -s4ze with the provisions hereof . 4 Eede 1955 - §984: 9394 Except that, if the majori t of the building sites on the same street and within 300. feet of e a lot ro osed to be built t on have an area or width that is less than those required in this section then the proposed lot ' S h a l l conform to that _ predominate lot area or width as a minimum. Where several lots are - used as one bui 1 din 9 site, the lot area shall be the total of the individual lots. The city council ma set the minimum lot area or width, b conditional use e rmi t, if there is no p redominate lot area or width and the majorit , ,_ _ Of l ots are less than the minimum set i this sect Sec. 36 - 70. Front yards. Each lot in an R -1 Res4deRee Distrct shall have a front yard of at least met - 4ess -than thirty (30) feet in depth_ fae ms -aRy- street - read-.- - ;f . f 4f ty (694 pereeAt -er -mere Exce t that, if the ma'orit of the then- exi*st4R9 dwellings hav4Rg- freRtages on the same street er - 1pead and withi 300 feet of the lot to be on have a predeMRaRt- freRt -yard setback from that street that is different than thirty feet, freRi- spee f4ed- here4R; then all bui ldings thereafter erected, altered or moved on that street er -read shall conform to that predominate setback front yard -depth as a minimum, u setbaek- 4*s appreved- 4R- wr4t4R 9 by.. net - 4ess - than f 4fty -eRe- X514- pereeRt ef- a14 -ef- the- ewRers - the -tbeR ex4st4Rg- bwi4d4Rgs -en- that - street -er- Read- w4th4R- three - hund red- 43994 -feet e# the- prepesed- ba44d4Rg- 4eeat4efi - �Eede- 1465 - §994 0494 A conditional use permit may be given to construct an addition to a sin Te dwellin when such addition, or thereof, extends into a minimum setback. Sec. 36 -71. Side yards. Each lot in an R -1 Res4deRee District shall have two (2) side yards, ere-eR - eaeh -s4de-ef- the- bu44d4Rg- - -Fer- every- bw4ldi*Rg- erected- er- strue- twra44y- a4tered3- eaeh -s4de- yard - shall -hare each having a width of Ret - 4ess than at least five (5) feet, subject to the following modifications: ; (1) 8R- a- eerper -4et -the The side yard on the street side of sweh a corner lot shat 1 have a width of pet -4ess -than at least thirty (30) feet. Ex cept that, if the majority of the dwel - I n s on the same street and within 300 feet of the lot to be built on have a setback from that street that is different than thirty feet, then all bui ldi.n s thereafter erected, altered or moved on that street shall conform to that - redomi nant setback as a minimum. A conditional use permit may be 21ven to construct an addition to a single dwell when such addition or part thereof, extends i nto a mi nimum setback. (2) A church or a - pab.14eT- pareeh4aI- 8r- pr4vate school shall have side yard of not less than fifty (50) feet on each side adjoin- ing ot her property or thirty feet from, a p ublic ri (3) When two (2) or more adjoining lots are used as a single build' . g . ing site, the side yard requirements shall apply only to the outside lot lines. (Code 1965, 8904 -050; Ord, No. 487 §904.0509 6&5-80) Section 2. Section 30 -8 (f) is hereby amended as follows \ addi ' ( t� ons are underlined and deletions are crossed out) : (f) Lots: (1) Single - family generally. The minimum lot dimensions i n subdivisions designated for single - family detached dwelling developments shall be: a. Seventy -five (75) feet wide at the established building setback line and on outside street curvatures; b. Not less than sixty (60) feet at the front lot line, except that lots located along the outside curves of curvi- linear streets or on the bulbs of cuts -de -sac shall be no less than forty (40) feet in width at the front lot l i n e ; c. Not less than ten thousand (10,000) square feet in area; and d. Not less than seven thousand five hundred (7,500) square feet i n area if designated as Rm. Medium Density Residential on the city land use plan. e. I the majority of the b u i l d i n g sites on the same street and within 300 feet of a lot proposed to be built on have an area or width that is less than those re uired in this section, then the proposed lot shall conform to tha p redominate lot area or g - width as a minimum. Where several lots are used as ' . one bu � 1 d i n site, the lot area shall be the total of the individual lots. The ci t council set the minimum lot area or width b conditional use permit, if there s no redominate lot area or width and the majority of lots are less than the minimum set in this section. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication* Passed by the Maplewood City Council on 198 Mayor Attest: Ayes— Clerk Nays -- Actiot by Cour_►c. End er ^e MEMORANDUM Mo -f e ------ �-.� -. Rei ect- �a._.. Date TO: City Manager FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: Phalen Place Traffic DATE: December 3, 1984 The city council requested staff to investigate Phalen Place residents' concern over excessive traffic on the street. This report focuses on the physical elements that contribute to the traffic on Phalen Place. Traffic counts were taken on a number of streets in the area in an attempt to identify traffic patterns. The attached map shows average daily traffic (ADT) in both directions at several locations. It is apparent from the map that the majority of the traffic on Phalen Place also uses Ripley Avenue. Ripley Avenue serves as a collector street within the neighborhood with Phalen Place serving as the logical access to and from Frost Avenue, Frost Avenue is the only link to the west for this area. Several alternatives are presented here for consideration. The first proposes making Phalen Place a one -way street. A one-way street in this type of environment is very unusual. Normally one -way streets are in more congested downtown areas. Drivers would likely be confused when presented with. this non - standard situation. Even momentary hesitation could contribute to an accident. A second alternative is construction of Walter Street in hopes that the traffic would distribute evenly between the new street and Phalen Place. The typical driver develops habits over a , period of time. Since Phalen Place is the only street presently available, all drivers are used to that route,. It would take a long time, if ever, to attract sufficient traffic to a new Walter Street to significantly affect the traffic on Phalen Place. The concept of parallel one- way streets in opposite directions could be used to split the traffic. This, however, has the same safety disadvantages discussed earlier. The third alternative is shown on the attached map. Phalen Place is physically separated from Ripley Avenue creating a dead end from the north. This requires some minor geometric changes at the Gordon - Ripley intersection along with construction of a cul- de-sac on Phalen Place. In.this situation, traffic would be diverted directly to East Shore Drive on Ripley Avenue. There is a' safety concern for adding more traffic to Ripley at East Shore Drive in light of the steep hill approaching the intersection. In addition the Public Safety Department is concerned that response time to this neighborhood would be adversely affected as well as periodic patrols. The fourth alternative considers no action at this time. Based on the assumption that Frost Avenue will be upgraded this summer, a re- evaluation of the situation next year- appears to be in order.. An improved Frost Avenue may present an attractive alternative to`Ripley Avenue since that is where the drivers ultimately want to be. Presently, however, Frost Avenue is in such poor shape that individuals avoid driving there in deference to their car's well being. .If it is not already obvious, staff recommends doing nothing at this time. It is hoped that in the interim stepped up enforcement by the police will provide some relief for the residents along Phalen Place. jw Attachments 2 ram 0 E• !1 Action.by Council: Endors --. . r Vol Modified.._..,, MEMORANDUM Rejected.. __ E NDUM Date TO: City Manager -FROM: Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Wal ter Street Feasibility Study, P.roject No. 84 -14 DATE: December 3, 1984 Enclosed herewith.. is the f e a s i b i l i t y study for the J above - named ro ' ect ,. p that has been prepared at the council's request. It s requested.. that the council consider the approaches as outlined in the report, mb