Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984 11-08 City Council PacketG) AWARD O F BIDS H) 'UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1..Reconsideration: PUD Revision - Sterling Glen- 2. Reconsideration: Appendix E 3, Code Amendment M -1 District AGENDA Maplewood City. Council 7:00 P.M., Thursday, November 8, 1984 Municipal Administration Building Meetinq 84 -24 A)CALL TO ORDER B)ROLL CALL C)APPROVAL OF MINUTES 10,Meeting 84 -23, October 22 1984 D)APPROVAL OF AGENDA E)CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are. considered to be routine by the City Counci 1 and wi 11- be enacted by one motion in the -form listed bel ow. There will be.no separate discussion on these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1.Accounts Payable 20 Budget Transfer - Hydrant Fund 3.Budget Transfer - V. E . M. Fund 4.Budget - Transfer - Street Maintenance 5.Final Payment - 78 -10 6:Final Payment - 81 -12 7.Cancellation- of Special Assessments - Ramse,y County 8.Budget Transfer - Police 90 Budget Transfer - Emergency Services 100 Time Extension - Schwichtenberg 11.Renewal of Off -Sale Liquor Licenses 120 Renewal of On -Sale Liquor Licenses 13.Rehearin g of - Mogren Landscaping I DR 140 Health Care Maintenance Account Plan F)PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.7:10 - Rezoning: 1717 -41 Edgerton 2.7:20 - Conditional Use Permit: 1960 Clarence. 3.7 :30 - Variance: 743 Century G) AWARD O F BIDS H) 'UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1..Reconsideration: PUD Revision - Sterling Glen- 2. Reconsideration: Appendix E 3, Code Amendment M -1 District I } NEW BUSINESS 1.Hearing Date: Co. Rd. B & Van Dyke 2.Bui l d i nq Permits 30 E. Mississippi Watershed Management Organization 4,Lake Overflow 5.Request for Waiver of P.A.C. Charaes (Ramsey Co.) 6.Tax Increment Dist. - Joseph Co. 7.Resignations: Planning Commission Civil Service Park .Recreation Commission 80 Natural Heritage Proqram jVISITOR PRESENTATIONS k) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. L) mom M) 2. 3. 4. 50 60 7. 8. 9. 10. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, October 22, 1984 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 84 -23 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present MaryLee Maids, Councilmember Present Michael T. Wasiluk, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended 1. Liquor License 2. No Smoking Rules in Public Buildings 3. Phalen Place Street 4. Sterling Glen 5. Appendix E 6. Frost Avenue and Walter Street 7. Reconsideration 8. Senior Home Share 9. No Parking 10. Storm Water Separation Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Anderson moved, seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk, Ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda as recommended 1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses, Check register dated October 10, 1984, through October 12, 1984, $384,104.66: Part TI - Payroll dated October 5, 1984 - $60,680,35) in the amount of $444,785.01. 2. Election Judges Resolution 84 - 10 - 153 1 - 10122 RESOLVED, that the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, accepts the following list of Election Judges for the 1984 General Election, Tuesday, November 6, 1984: Precinct #1 Precinct #7 Eleanor Mathews Margaret Wolszon Lorraine Schneider Myrtle Malm Florence Stella Betty Haas Agnes Allen Esther Dollerschel Idamae Biebighauser Arnella Podgorski Helen Jean Dickson Sharon Giel Precinct #2 Precinct #8 Pat Thompson Jean Myers Evelyn Axdahl Betty Berglund Kathleen Dittel Lorraine Fischer Bea Hendricks Rita Frederickson Karen Burton Mildred Houck Marilyn Cunningham Anna Fox Precinct #3 Precinct #9 Barb Leiter Mary Johnson Doris Broady Delores Mallet Yvonne Bell Margaret McDonald Alice Miller Paul Arbuckle Irene Anderson Katherine Moore Charlene Arbuckle Theodore Haas Precinct #4 Precinct #10 Caroline Warner Anne Fosburgh Joyce Lipinski Mary Lou Lieder Marjory Tooley Dorothy Arbore Betty Eddy Pat Werden Jack Arbuckle Diane Golaski Charlene Knutson Precinct #5 Precinct #11 Elsie Wiegert Delores Lofgren Emma Klebe Maxine Olson Sibbie Sandquist Shirley Luttrell Phyllis Erickson Karen Boget- Abrahamson Joyce Schmidt Sigrid Hart Lynette Leonard Joan Cottrell Precinct #6 Precinct #12 Kathy Supan Mary Libhardt Gmborg Mowchan Audrey Duellman Sandy Jones Deloris Fastner Linda Prigge Mildred Dhen Joanne Houghton Orpha Getty Judy Widholm 2 - 10122 3. Budget Transfer (Community Services) Approved a budget transfer of $7,700.00 from Account No. 01 =4020- 208 -63 to Account No. 01- 4480- 208 -63 to allow North East Soccer Association to issue checks to pay soccer officials. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7`.00 P.M., Code Amendment: M -1 District a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding changes to the M -1 District of the Maplewood Zoning Code. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Geoff Olson presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: Commissioner Barrett moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the proposed ordinance to amend the M -1 District as proposed by staff with the addition to (1) (10) to in- clude the word 'poultry'. Commissioner Sigmundik seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Fischer, Larson, Pellish, Sigmundik, Whitcomb." d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Bastian moved first reading of an ordinance amending Section 36 permitted uses in M -1 Light Manufacturing District. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Wasiluk Nay - Councilmember Maids. 2. 7:00 P.M., Conditional Use Permit: White Bear Avenue (Ramsey County) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Ramsey County for a conditional use permit to construct a two -story office/ maintenance shop building to be located on the Ramsey County Fair Grounds. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Geoff Olson presented the Planning Commission recommendation. d. Larry Holmberg, Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department, spoke on behalf of the proposal. 3 - 10/22 e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f, Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 - 10 - 154 WHEREAS, the Ramsey County Department of Parks and Recreation initiated a conditional use permit for a conditional use permit for an office /main- tenance shop facility at the following - described property: Subj. to White Bear Avenue and a pipeline esmt. and subj. to Van Dyke St. and ex the S 235.8 ft. and ex the N 52 ft, of the S 287.8 off the W 160.5 ft. and ex the W 270 ft. lying N of the S 700 ft, that part S of the Mpls -St. Paul and S St. Marie RR R/W of the W 870 ft. of the S 1/2 of the N 1/4 in Sec. 14, T 29, R. 22. This property is also known as the Ramsey County Fair Grounds, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use.permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by Ramsey County, pur- suant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on October 1, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on October 22, 1984. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described conditional use permit be approved and the one -year review be waived, on the basis of the following findings -of -fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detri- mental to the public health; safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4, The use would not depreciate property values, 4 - 10/22 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal.veglicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or park- ing needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detri- mental to the welfare of the city. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 11. The use is surrounded by county land and would have no significant effect on adjacent properties. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. .Byes - all. 3. 7:20 P.M., Rezoning - County Road B and McMenemy a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the rezoning of Lot 5 and 6, Block 36, Dawson Suburban Acres from B -C (Business - Commercial) to R -1 Single dwelling district. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Mr. Sheldon Caswell, attorney representing the owner of the property, Mrs. Alice Londin stated Mrs. Londin had passed away this morning and would request Council delay action until he had a chance to review the situation. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents e f g Mary E. Olson, 365 E. County Road B Tony Phillippi, 380 E. County Road B Elizabeth Olson, 2137 McMenemy Road Harry Koval, 2191 Arkwright Don Bother, 2184 Arkwright The following were heard: Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard.. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. Councilmember Anderson introduced the adoption resolution and moved its 5 - 10/22 84 - 10 - 155 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business commercial and F. farm residence to R -1, residence district (single dwelling) for the following - .described property: Lots 4 - 6, block 36, Dawson's Suburban Acre Lots and block one, Londin Homesites WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on October 15, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on October 22, 1984, to consider this rezoning, Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an oppor- tunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also con - oidered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the Following findings of fact: t The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code and comprehensive plan, because it would strengthen the existing single - dwelling residential character of the neighborhood. 2. The proposed use would not detract from the use of neighboring properties. 3. It would be in the public interest to plan for the conversion of the office building property to single dwelling property. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. 5. The proposed zoning would not be overly restrictive for the office building site, because it can be divided into two single - dwelling lots very similar in size to several nearby lots. 6. The neighborhood commercial zone is not recommended, because it would allow a substantial nonresidential expansion of the use of this site. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 4. 7:40 P.M„ Rezoning, White Bear Avenue (Skippers) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Skippers Inc. to rezone the property located on White Bear Avenue 6 - 10122 south of Chesters Restaurant from F -Farm Residence to BC - Business Commercial for - the purpose of constructing a restaurant. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Mr. Herb Boeckerman representing Skippers, spoke on behalf of the proposal. d. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following expressed their views: The owner of the property at Chesters, 3088 White Bear Avenue. Mr, Bob Hajicek, 1701 E. Co. Road D. e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. f, Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 - 10 - 156 WHEREAS, Herb Boeckerman initiated a rezoning from F, farm residence to BC, business commercial to for the following - described property: That part of the following described parcel lying westerly of the easterly 114.15 feet thereof: That part of the North 10 acres of the East 20 acres of the North half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the easterly of the easterly right -of -way line of White Bear Avenue and the North line of the South 100,0 feet of said 10 acres; thence easterly along said North line of the South 100 feet a distance of 309.40 feet; thence northerly at a right angle 155094 feet to a point of the parallel with and distant 493050 feet South of the North line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 2; thence westerly along said parallel line 306.82 feet to the easterly right -of -way line of White Bear Avenue; thence southerly along said right -of -way line to the point of beginning. Subject to an easement in favor of Northern States Power Company and an easement'in favor of the American Oil Company. Containing 0.70 acres more or less. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by Herb Boeckerman, Skipper's, Inc., pursuant to Chapter 36 Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2, This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on October 1, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be 3, The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on October 22, 1984 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present writted statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the 7 - 10/22 above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code and the land use plan. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring p rmperty or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare, 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Approval is subject to the applicant submitting written permission from NSP and Standard Oil to build within their easements. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk, Ayes - all. 5. 7:5- P.M., Rezoning: 1800 Edgerton (Forest Lawn Cemetery) a, Mayor Greavu convend the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposal to rezone 1800 Edgerton Street (Forest Lawn Cemetery)from BC, Business Commercial to F. Farm Residence, b, Manager Evans presented the staff report. c, Chairman Les Axdahl presented the Planning Commission recommendation, d, Mayor Greavu called for porponents. None were heard, e, Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard, f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing, g. Councilmember Maida introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 - 10 - 157 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business commercial to F, farm residence for the following- described properties: That part of the Forest Cemetery Rearrangement of plat B, lying north of the Soo Line railroad right -of -way, within the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 17, Township 29, Range 22; and That part of the N 112 of the Soo Line railroad right -of -way lying east of the center line of Edgerton Street and west of the northerly extension of the east line of lot 22, block 1, Ufton Grove Second Plat, 8 -, 10122 WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36 Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2, This rezoning was reviewd by the Maplewood Planning Commission on October 1, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on October 22, 1984 to consider this rezoning, Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present writted statements, The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change in consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substatially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the peoperty adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare, 4, The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian, Ayes - all, G. AWARD OF BIDS 1, Used Vehicles a, Manager Evans presented the staff report. b, Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 -10 -158 WHEREAS, a number of City Vehicles have been determined surplus, bids were received October 12, 1984 at 3:30 P.M. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the surplus vehicles be sold to the highest bid as follows: 9 - 10/22 Vehicle.High Bid 2nd High 3rd High 82 Ford Ltd 1,251.00 1,016.45 520.00 82 Ford Ltd 1,566080 1,300.00 1,001.00 82 Ford Ltd 1,901.01 1,723-50 1,511.00 82 Ford Ltd 1,341090 1,001.00 620.00 Seconded by Councilmember Maids,Ayes - all. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Letter from Ralph McGinley (Advance Circuits) - a. Manager Evans stated Advance Circuits, Inc. was requesting the City withdraw the requirement of the $20,000.00 payment for the allocation regarding the $3.6 million industrial revenue bond, b. Councilmember Bastian moved to accept the letter from Mr. Ralph McGinley and to take no action on the request. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 2. T. H. 120 and 3M Road Signals a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 -10 -159 RESOLVED, that the plans for T. H. 120 and 3M Road System are hereby approved. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson.Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson and Wasiluk. Nays - Councilmembers Bastian and Maida. 3. Beaver Lake Drainage Study a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and m its adoption 84 10 - 160 is WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of the North Beaver Lake drainage area by construction of storm sewer and sanitary sewer systems, and WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 10 - 10/22 I.. The report of the City Engineer advising this Council that the proposed improvement on the North Beaver Lake drainage area by implementation of a storm drainage system plan is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to M.S.A. Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $650,000.00. 3. A public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1380 Frost Avenue on Monday, the 26th day of November, 1984, at, 7 p.m. to consider said improvement. The City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk.Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Maida, and Wasiluk. Nays - Councilmember Bastian. J. VISITOR PRESENTATION None. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATION 1. Liquor License. a. Councilmember Wasiluk commented on the requirement to sell Low Alcohol Beer in On Sale Liquor Establishments. b. Staff answered questions from the Council. 2. Smoking in public buildings. a. Councilmember Wasiluk questioned the procedures in keeping smoking segregated. b. Staff will investigate. 3. Phalen Place- Frost Avenue and Walter Street a. Councilmember Wasiluk commented on the need for improvements. b. Director of Public Works, Ken Haider, explained the specifics of the proposal. c. Councilmember Anderson introduced the fo resolution and moved its adoption 84 _ 10 - 161 WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is necessary and expedient that the area described as Walter Steet from Frost Avenue to Fenton Avenue be improved by construction of streets, storm sewer, watermain's and all necessary appurtenances NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, 11 - 10/22 that the improvement as hereinbefore described is hereby referred to the City Engineer, and he is instructed to..report to the Council with..;, all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and should best be made as proposed, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. 4. Sterling Glen Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers, Anderson, Maida and Wasiluk. Nay - Councilmember Bastian. a. Councilmember Maida moved to reconsider Council action of October 8th 1984, concerning Sterling Glen Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Maida and Wasiluk. Nay - Councilmember Bastian. 5. Appendix E a. Councilmember Maida moved to reconsider Council's Action of October 8th 1984, regarding Appendix E Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - Councilmembers Bastian, Maida, and Wasiluk. Nays - Mayor Greavu, Councilmember Anderson. 6. Frost Avenue and Walter Street Discussed K -3o 7. Reconsideration Discussed K -4 and 5 8. Senior Home Share Program a. Councilmember Bastian stated that on November 2, 1984 at 3:00 P.m., 1902 E. County Road B, there will be a meeting concerning the Senior Home Share Program. 9. No parking a. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 -10 -162 RESOLVED, that Ramsey County is requested to designate the South side of Frost Avenue from Ide Street to Birmingham Street "NO PARKING." Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. loo Position Paper - Suburban Storm Water Separation a. Mayor Greavu commented on a position paper from St. Paul regarding the suburban areas storm water separation. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATION 12 - 10/22 1. St. Paul Business Center - Final Approval I.D.R. a. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 84 - 10 - 163 RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, as follows: ARTICLE ONE DEFINITIONS, LEGAL AUTHORIZATION AND FINDINGS 1 -1. Definitions. The terms used herein, unless the context hereof shall require otherwise shall have the following meanings, and any other terms defined in the Loan Agreement shall have the same meanings when used herein as assigned to them in the Loan Agreement unless the context or use thereof indicates another or different meaning or intent. Act the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, as amended; Assignment of Rents and Leases the agreement to be executed by the Borrower assigning all the rents, issues and profits derived from the Project to the Lender to secure the repayment of the Note and interest thereon; Bond Counsel the firm of Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, of St. Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota, or any other firm of nationally recognized bond counsel, and any opinion of Bond Counsel shall be a written opinion signed by such Bond Counsel; Borrower St. Paul Business Center East, a Minnesota limited partnership, its successors, assigns, and any surviving, resulting or transferee business entity which may assume its obligations under the Loan Agreement; City the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, its successors and assigns; Construction Fund the fund established by the City pursuant to this Resolution and into the Construction Fund the proceeds of the Note will be deposited; Disbursing Agreement the agreement to be executed by the City, the Borrower and the Lender, relating to the disbursement and payment of Project Costs for the construction and installation of the Project; Guarantors collectively, William S. Reiling and Donald Bachmeier; 13 - 10/22 Guaranty the guaranty of the payment of, among other things, the principal of and interest on the Note to be executed by the Guarantors as of the date of this Agreement; Improvements the structures and other improvements, including any tangible personal property, to be constructed or installed by the Borrower on the Land in accordance with the Plans and Specifications; Land the real property and any other easements and rights described in Exhibit A attached to the Loan Agreement; Leases leases of space in the Project between the Borrower and various tenants, including any amendment thereof or supplement thereto, entered into in accordance with the provisions thereof; Lender First National Bank of Minneapolis, in Minneapolis, Minnesota, its successors and assigns; Loan Agreement the agreement to be executed by the City and the Borrower, providing for the issuance of the Note and the loan of the proceeds thereof to the Borrower, including any amendments or supplements thereto made in accordance with its provisions; Mortgage the Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Financing Statement between the Borrower as mortgagor, to the Lender, as mortgagee, securing payment of the Note and interest thereon including any mortgage supplemental thereto entered into in accordance with the provisions thereof; Note the $3,900,000 Commercial Development Revenue Note of 1984, (St. Paul Business Center East Project) to be issued by the City pursuant to this Resolution; Note Register the records kept by the City Clerk to provide for the registration of transfer of ownership of the Note; Plans and Specifications the plans and specifications for the construction and installation of the Improvements on the Land, which are approved by the Lender, together with such modifications thereof and additions thereto as are reasonably determined by the Borrower to be necessary or desirable for the completion of the Improvements and are approved by the Lender; Pledge Agreement the agreement to be executed by the City and the Lender pled}ng and assigning the Loan Agreement to the Lender; Principal Balance so much of the principal sum on the Note as remains unpaid at any time; Project the Land and Improvements as they may at any time exist; Project Costs the total of all "Construction Costs" and Loan and Carrying Charges," as those terms are defined in the Loan Agreement; 14 - 10/22 Resolution this Resolution of the City adopted October 22, 1984, authorizing the issuance of the Note, together with any supplement or amendment thereto. All references in this instrument to designated Articles," "Sections" and other subdivisions are to the desig- nated Articles, Sections and subdivisions of this resolution as originally adopted. The words "herein," "hereof" and "hereund- er" and other words of similar import refer to this Resolution as a whole not to any particular Article, Section or subdivis- ion. 1 -2. Legal Authorization The City is a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota and is authorized under the Act to initiate the revenue producing project herein referred to, and to issue and sell the Note for the purpose, in the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Act and in this Resolution. 1 -3. Findings The City Council has heretofore determined, and does hereby determine, as follows: 1) The City is authorized by the Act to enter into a Loan Agreement for the public purposes expressed in the Act; 2) The City has made the necessary arrangements with the Borrower for the establishment within the City of a Project consisting of certain property all as more fully described in the Loan Agreement and which will be of the character and accomplish the purposes provided by the Act, and the City has by this Resolution authorized the Project and the execution of the Loan Agreement, the Pledge Agreement, the Note and the Disbursing Agreement, which documents specify certain terms and conditions of the acquisition and financing the Improvements to be included in the Project; 3) in authorizing the Project the City's purpose is, and- in its judgment the effect thereof will be, to promote the public welfare by: the attraction, encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce so as to prevent, so far as possible, the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; the develop- ment of revenue - producing enterprises to use the available resources of the community, in order to retain the benefit of the community's existing investment in educational and public service facilities;,the »halting of the movement of talented, educated personnel of all ages to other areas thus preserving the economic and human resources needed as a base for providing governmental services and facilities; the provision of acces- sible employment opportunities for residents in the area; the expansion of an adequate tax base to finance the cost of governmental services, including educational services for the school district serving the community in which the Project is situated; 15 - 10/22 4) the amount estimated to be necessary to partially finance the Project Costs, including the costs and estimated costs permitted by Section 474.05 of the Act, will require the issuance of the Note in the aggregate principal amount of 3,900,000 as hereinafter provided; 5) it is desirable, feasible and consistent with the objects and purposes of the Act to issue the Note, for the purpose of financing the Project; 6) the Note and the interest accruing thereon do not constitute an indebtedness of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation and do not consti- tute or give rise to a pecuniary liability or a charge against the general credit or taxing powers of the City and neither the full faith and credit nor the taxing powers of the City are pledged for the payment of the Note or interest thereon; and 7) the Note is an industrial development bond within the meaning of Section 103(b) of the Internal Revenue Code and is to be issued within the exemption provided under subparagraph D) of Section 103(b)(6) of the Code with respect to an issue of $10,000,000 or less, provided that nothing herein shall prevent the City from hereafter qualifying the Note under a different exemption if, and to the extent, such exemption is permitted by law and consistent with the objects and purposes of tM Project. 1 -4. Authorization and Ratification of Project. The City has heretofore and does hereby authorize the Borrower, in accordance with the provisions of Section 474.03(7) of the Act and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Disbursing Agreement, to provide for the acquisition, construction and installation of the Project by such means as shall be available to the Borrower and in the manner determined by the Borrower, and without advertisement for bids as may be required for the construction and acquisi- tion of municipal facilities; and the City hereby ratifies, affirms, and approves all actions heretofore taken by the Borrower consistent with and in anticipation of such authority and in compliance with the Plans and Specifications. ARTICLE TWO NOTE 2 -1. Authorized Amount and Form of Note The Note issued pursuant to this Resolution shall be in substantially the form set forth herein, with such appropri- ate variations, omissions and insertions as are permitted or required by this Resolution, and in accordance with the further provisions hereof; and the total principal amount of the Note that may be outstanding hereunder is expressly limited to 3,900,000. The Note shall be in substantially the following form: 16 - 10/22 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Commercial Development Revenue Note of 1984 St. Paul Business Center East Project) 3,900,000 FOR VALUE RECEIVED the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, Ramsey County, Minnesota (the "City "), hereby promises to pay the FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS (the "Lender "), its succes- sors or registered assigns (the Lender and any such successor or registered assignee being also sometimes hereinafter referred to as the "Holder "), from the source and in the manner hereinafter provided, the principal sum of THREE MILLION NINE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($3,900,000) or so much thereof as remains unpaid from time to time (the "Principal Balance "), with interest thereon at the rates specified in paragraph 1(a) hereof (the "Tax Exempt Rates ") or at such higher rate as provided in paragraph 1(c) hereof (the "Taxable Rate "), in any coin or currency which at the time or times of payment is legal tender for the payment of public or private debts in the United States of America, in accordance with the terms hereinafter set forth. 1. (a) From and after the date hereof through and including July 31, 1995, interest shall be paid at the rate of ll % per annum. On the date hereof, the City shall pay as and for additional interest for the period from the date hereof through September 30, 1985 the sum of $78,000. For the period from August 1 in each of years 1995, 2000, 2005 and 2010 (the Adjustment Dates "), through July 31 immediately preceeding the next subsequent Adjustment Date, or in the case of interest from August 1, 2010 to October 1, 2014 (the "Final Maturity Date "), interest shall accrue at an annual rate which will in the written opinion of the Lender (or successor Holder) delivered to the City within one week of the Adjustment Date, allow the Note to be marketed on the Adjustment Date at par subject to the limitation that such annual rate shall be not less than 115% nor more than 135% of the yield to maturity stated in the "25 Rev. Bonds Index" appearing in the Credit Markets (or successor publication) for the last week immediately preceeding the Adjustment Date. b) Interest only shall be payable on the Principal Balance on the first day of the calendar month next 17 - 10122 succeeding the date hereof and on the first day of each succeeding month thereafter through and including October 1, 1988. Commencing November 1, 1988 and on the first day of each calendar month thereafter, the Principal Balance and interest accrued thereon shall be paid in equal monthly installments in the amount necessary to fully amortize the Principal Balance over the period remaining before the Final Maturity Date. The amount of the monthly installments due hereunder shall be increased or decreased on each Adjustment Date to reflect any adjustment to the rate of interest borne by this Note pursuant to the terms hereof and by prepayments of principal previously made. All payments shall be applied first to accrued interest and thereafter to reduction of the Principal Balance. c)(i) In the event that the interest on this Note shall become subject to federal income taxation pursuant to a Determination of Taxability (as hereinafter defined), the interest rate on this Note shall be increased, retroactively effective from and after the Date of Taxability (as hereinafter defined) to 16% (the "Taxable Rate "), provided, however, that in no event shall the Taxable Rate for any period be less than the Tax Exempt Rate otherwise in effect for the same period. The City shall immediately upon demand pay to the Holder and to each prior Holder affected by such Determination of Taxability an amount equal to the amount by which the interest accrued retroactively at such increased rate from the Date of Taxability to the date of payment exceeds the amount of interest actually accrued and paid to the Holder and any such prior Holder during said period. Such obligation of the City shall survive the payment in full of the principal amount of this Note. Commencing on the payment date next following the notice of taxability and continuing on each payment date there- after (unless the Holder shall accelerate the maturity of the Note pursuant to clause (ii) of this paragraph (c)), this Note shall be payable as follows: A) if amortization of the Principal Balance had not theretofore commenced, the monthly payments of interest only under paragraph b) shall be increased to reflect the accrual of interest at the Taxable Rate and the monthly installments of principal and interest payable commencing with the November 1, 1986 payment shall be recomputed on the basis of the Taxable Rate in affect from time to time so that the unpaid principal and interest shall be amortized over the period remaining before the Final Maturity Date; or 18 10122 B) if amortization of the Principal Balance had theretofore commenced, the monthly installments of principal and interest payable commencing with the next succeeding payment shall be recomputed on the basis of the Taxable Rate in effect from time to time so that unpaid principal and interest shall be amortized over the period remaining before the Final Maturity of the Note. ii) Upon a Determination of Taxability, the Holder may declare the entire Principal Balance of this Note together with accrued interest thereon at such retroactively increased Taxable Rate to be immediately due and payable, but without the prepayment premium, if any, specified in paragraph 8 hereof. iii) The Holder shall give notice, as soon as practicable, to the Borrower of any Notice of Taxability, as hereinafter defined, received by the Holder and permit the Borrower to contest, litigate or appeal the same at its sole expense. In the event any such contest, litigation or appeal is undertaken, the increased interest provided in paragraph c)(i) shall, nevertheless, be payable to the Holder and shall be held by the Holder in escrow (without paying interest thereon) pending final disposition of such contest, litigation or appeal, provided that the Borrower shall indemnify and hold harmless the Holder and each prior Holder from any and all penalties, interest or other liabilities which they may incur on account of such contest, litigation or appeal. iv) The terms "Determination of Taxability," Date of Taxability" and "Notice of Taxability" shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Loan Agreement, dated the date hereof (the "Loan Agreement "), between the City and St. Paul Business Center East (the "Borrower "). 2. In any event, the payments hereunder shall be sufficient to pay all principal and interest due, as such principal and interest becomes due, and to pay any premium or penalty, at maturity, upon redemption, or otherwise. Interest shall be computed on the basis of a 360 day year, but charged for the actual number of days principal is unpaid. 3. Principal and interest and any premium due hereunder shall be payable at the principal office of the Lender, or at such other place as the Holder may designate in writing. 4. This Note is issued by the City to finance the acquisition and completion of a Project, as defined in Section 474.02, Subdivisions la, Minnesota Statutes, consisting of the 19 - 10/22 acquisition of land and the construction and installation thereon of an office complex containing office /warehouse space, pursuant to the Loan Agreement, and this Note is further issued pursuant to and in full compliance with the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, particularly Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, and pursuant to a resolution of the CityCouncildulyadoptedonOctober22, 1984 (the "Resolution "). 5. This Note is secured by a Pledge Agreement of even date herewith by the City to the Lender (the "Pledge Agreement "), a Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Financing Statement of even date herewith among the Borrower as mortgagor, and the Lender as mortgagee (the Mortgage "), and an Assignment of Rents and Leases, of even date herewith, from the Borrower to the Lender (the "Assignment of Rents and Leases "). The proceeds of this Note shall be placed in the Construction Fund established pursuant to the Resolution and the Disbursing Agreement (hereinafter referred to) and disbursement of the proceeds of this Note from the Construction Fund is subject to the terms and conditions of a Disbursing Agreement of even date herewith among the Lender, the City, the Borrower and Title Insurance Company of Minnesota the "Disbursing Agreement "). 6. The Holder may extend the times of payments of interest and /or principal of or any penalty or premium due on this Note, including the date of the Final Maturity Date, to the extent permitted by law, without notice to or consent of any party liable hereon and without releasing any such party. However, in no event may the Final Maturity Date be extended beyond thirty (30) years from the date hereof. 7. The Borrower may prepay the Principal Balance in whole or if in part in increments of $100,000 on any payment date upon at least 30 days advance written notice to the Holder or such lesser period of notice as the Holder may approve) and upon payment of an amount equal to the principal amount being so prepaid, plus accrued interest hereon to the date of prepayment, plus the prepayment premium calculated in accordance with paragraph 8 hereof. This Note is also subject to mandatory prepayment in whole or in part pursuant to Section 2.05 of the Disbursing Agreement in the amount of any suns remaining in the Construction Fund at the Completion Date (as such terms are defined in the Disbursing Agreement), in which event a prepayment premium shall also be payable in accordance with paragraph 8 hereof, and the time of such prepayment may not be extended pursuant to paragraph 6 hereof. Upon the occurrence of certain "Events of Default" under the Loan Agreement and /or under the Mortgage, and as provided in paragraph 12 hereof, the Holder may declare the Principal 20 - 10/22 Balance and accrued interest on this Note to be immediately due and payable (any such action and any similar action pursuant to paragraph l(c)(ii) hereof being hereinafter referred to as an acceleration" of this Note), in which event, except for an acceleration pursuant to paragraph 1(c)(ii) a prepayment premium shall also be payable in accordance with paragraph 8 hereof. Upon the occurrence of certain events of damage, destruction or condemnation, the Holder may, as provided in the Mortgage, apply the net proceeds of any insurance or condem- nation award to the prepayment, in whole or in part, of the Principal Balance in which event a prepayment premium shall be payable if an Event of Default had occurred under the Loan Agreement or the Mortgage and remains uncured at the time such prepayment is made. This Note may be called for redemption and prepay- ment, in whole, on each Adjustment Date (or at any time within the six months period following each Adjustment Date) at the option of the Holder, upon at least thirty (30) days' advance written notice to the Borrower (or such lesser period of notice as the Borrower may approve). 8. (a) This Note maybe prepaid in whole, but not in part, on each Adjustment Date without a penalty or premium. b) At the time of any prepayment or acceleration of this Note and where there is a payment of a premium required by the provisions of this Note, the Borrower shall pay, together with the premium, if any, set forth in paragraph (c) hereof, an amount equal to 1 -1/2% of the amount of principal so prepaid. c) At the time of any prepayment or acceleration of this Note and where there is payment of a premium required by the provisions of this Note and the yield on U.S. Treasury securities (as published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York) having a maturity date closest to the next Adjustment Date (the "Government Yield "), as determined by the Holder as of the date of prepayment or acceleration, is less than two and one -half percent in excess of the interest rate then payable hereon, the Borrower shall pay a premium calculated as follows: (a) The amount of principal so prepaid shall be multiplied by (i) the amount by which the stun of two and one -half percent plus the interest rate then payable hereon exceeds the Government Yield as of the date of prepayment or acceleration, times (ii) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days remaining to the next Adjustment Date and 21 10/22 the denominator of which is 360. (b) The resulting product shall then be divided by the number of whole months then remaining to the next Adjustment Date, yielding a quotient (the Quotient "). (c) The amount of the prepayment premium payable under this paragraph shall be the present value on the date of prepayment or acceleration (using the Government Yield as of the date of prepayment or acceleration as the discount factor) of a stream of equal monthly payments in number equal to the number of whole months remaining to the next Adjustment Date, with the amount of each such hypothetical monthly payment equal to the Quotient and with the first payment payable on the date of prepayment or acceleration Notwithstanding the foregoing, no such prepayment premium shall be payable with respect to a prepayment made at the option of the Holder pursuant to Article Five of the Mortgage or Section 5.02 of the Loan Agreement unless an Event of Default had occurred under the Loan Agreement or the Mortgage and remains uncured at the time such prepayment is made. 9. The payments due under paragraph 1 hereof shall continue to be due and payable in full until the entire , Principal Balance and accrued interest due on this Note have been paid regardless of any partialrprepayment made hereunder. 10. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Note is transfer- able upon the books of the City at the office of the City Manager by the Holder in person or by his agent duly authorized in writing, at the Holder's expense, upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the City Clerk duly executed by the Holder or his duly authorized agent. Upon such transfer the City Clerk will note the date of registration and the name and address of the new registered Holder in the registration blank appearing below. The City may deem and treat the person in whose name the Note is last registered upon the books of the City with such registration noted on the Note, as the absolute owner hereof, whether or not overdue, for the purpose of receiving payment of or on the account of the Principal Balance, redemption price or interest and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to the Holder or upon his order shall be valid and effective to satisfy and discharge the liability upon the Note to the extent of the sum or sums so paid, and the City shall not be affected by any notice to the contrary. 11. This Note and interest hereon and any premium due hereunder are payable solely from the revenues and proceeds under the Loan Agreement pledged to the payment thereof pursuant to the'Pledge Agreement, except as the same may otherwise be payable in accordance with the Mortgage and the Assignment of Rents and Leases, and do not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory 22 -; 10/22 limitation, are not payable from or a charge upon any funds other than the revenues and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, and do not give rise to a pecuniary liability of the City or, to the extent permitted by law, of any of its offi- cers, agents or employees, and no holder of this Note shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay this Note or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City, and this Note does not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City, and the agreement of the City to perform or cause the performance of the covenants and other provisions herein referred to shall be subject at all times to the availability of revenues or other funds furnished for such purpose in accordance with the Loan Agreement, sufficient to pay all costs of such performance or the enforcement thereof. 12. It is agreed that time is of the essence of this Note. If the City defaults in the payment when due of any installment of principal or interest or any premium or penalty due hereunder and if said default shall have continued for a period of ten (10) days, or if an Event of Default shall occur as set forth in the Mortgage, the Disbursing Agreement or the Loan Agreement, then the Holder shall have the right and option to declare the Principal Balance, and accrued interest thereon, together with the premium specified in paragraph 8 hereof, immediately due and payable but solely from the sources specified in paragraph 11 hereof. Failure to exercise such option at any time shall not constitute a waiver of the right to exercise the same at any subsequent time. 13. The remedies of the Holder, as provided herein and in the Mortgage, the Assignment of Rents and Leases, the Loan Agreement and the Disbursing Agreement, are not exclusive and shall be cumulative and concurrent and may be pursued singly, successively or together, at the sole discretion of the Holder, and may be exercised as often as occasion therefor shall occur; and the failure to exercise any such right or remedy shall in no event be construed as a waiver or release thereof. 14. The Holder shall not be deemed, by any act of omission or commission, to have waived any of its rights or remedies hereunder unless such waiver is in writing and signed by the Holder, and then only to the extent specifically set forth in the writing. A waiver with reference to one event shall not be construed as continuing or as a bar to or waiver of any right or remedy as to a subsequent event. 15. This Note shall convert to a non - recourse obligation of the City and the Borrower upon the terms and conditions contained in the Loan Agreement. 23 - 10122 IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all condi- tions, acts and things required to exist, happen and be perform- ed precedent to or in the issuance of this Note do exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due form as required by law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Note to be duly executed in its name by the manual signatures of the Mayor and City Clerk, and has caused the corporate seal to be affixed hereto, and has caused this Note to be dated October , 1984. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. M. AJOURNMENT 9:00 P. M. City Clerk 24 - 10/22 MANUAL CHECKS FOR OCTOBER 1984 page: 1984 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK No.DATE AMOUNT VENDOq ITEM DESCRIPTION 21 594 10/30/84 20000 SUBURBAN UTILITES TRAVEL TRAINING 20.00 266046 10/30/84 550035_ -.__ ___.PRCPERTr TAl(ATiON TAKES 286046 10/30/84 4:801.81 PROP'_RTV TAXATION TAXES 5.352.16 296M69 10/3C/84 3025.74 - -MI hN ST TREASURER.MOTOR VEH LIC 286M69 10/30/84 0102980 MINN STATE TREASURER MCT OR VEH LTC 39623. 289C57 1U/30/84 i2a.47 KENNETR" COLLINS TRAVEL TRAINING 1200 4T C 299K20 x.0'/30/84 459Gfl R3SEMART KANE FIR DEDUCT45.00 289M69 289M69 130/84 U' /30/8 5 , p563.50 407 .00 MZNN ST TREASURER MCTCR VET LIC PEMiNNSTATETEASMOTORVENLrcP0- 269N80 2b9A8Q 13/30184 10 /30/84 9.53 N•S UTILITIES 2b9h8C 10%30/84 2.40 2.40 N.S.Q..4 UTILITIES 289N80 19/30/e484 240 A S.P UTILITIES 269N80 1U/30/84 2 S.P.UTILITIES 289N80 10/30/E4 40 - - - 1279 66 h•S•' • _ N. S.P.UTILITIES Z89N80 2691180 10 /30/84 38.x)II.S.P 9 UTI. LI TIE S 289N80 _ 13 /30/84 l t;13J/84 _4.25 N.S.UTILITIES UTILITIES 2891180 10l30/F4 6 .O T 18.28 N.S.? . -UTI LI TIES 28<9N80 10/30/84 48.23 UTILITIES 299N80 10/3'x/84 10.00- A.S.?.UTILITIES 2891V8o 10/30/84 3T3.OT N.S.P UTILITIES 299 _._ T- 10/30/84 238e43 N.S.P.UTILITIES 289NBO 10/3 0 / 8 4 S09'.)2 Q.S.UTILITIES 1 366 - ,r85 N.S.P.UTILITIES 2" RIC ._.10130/84 41 .00 R AMS: - Y CNTY COURT AMB RUNS ti w• 1984 CITY OF MAPLE1000 CHECK RESISTER CHECK NQ.DATE_ - - __AM VENDO R ITEM OESCRIPTIO 2Y3.5 92 29055.00 NESA 2,055.70 ROSRAMS 290 83G 2ytL3D 10/30/84 1J /?0/84 24261792BLL8 CROSS INSURANCE PBL293E301t /30/84 3 TQb.32 ELU,. CROSS BLUE CROSS INSURANCE PBL' 4 r 567.3 2 *IASUR ANC= PBL 29CM69 2 10/30/84 1U /30/84 59418.29 35 0 MINN S11 T .EASURER MOTOR VEM LIC P00 59763.29 f MINN STS TR EASURER MOTOR V €h l IC R. 29J r76 29O r76 1 J /3'3/8 i 1J /30/84 13.37 MN ST TREAS acRA PER A PBL5 *00 18 t MN ST TREAS Pr p ERA P 8 l 290K8Q 10 /30/P; N.S.P 980.21 UTILITIES 291C40 10 130lF4 1Q'*. 000 CLERK OF COUR108.10 f CCtJ hTY p8L 291 P69 10/30/84 3 653, 36 _291 M6 9 10!30!84 380 IN!V STAT;. THE 4S MOTOR y% LIC Rw 4- ,033.36 * MINN STA. TE TREAS MOTOR VEH PL C 292M69 292M6Sr 10/30 84 10 /3C/84 4,p 765 .39 2Ca.DQ MINN STA T TREAS MOTOR VEH LIC P 292869 10/30/84 3fl5.Q0 MiNN STATE TREAS MOTOR VEH LIC P 5.270..39 KENNETH COLLINS TRA VEL TRAINING 292M76 292tM76 -- 13/30/e4 113/30/84 5716• 73 741 MN ST TREAS PIRA PRA PBL23 1 5 ,9 312.96 t MN ST TRE4S VERA PER PB L 293593 10/30/84 66. Da S a K BLACKTOP MAI NT Of p4d 1984 CITY OF MAFLF WOOD CREC K NO. DATE CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT vZNO0;ITEM DES CRIPTI 66000 : 293C4U 10 130/84 4 ,050.00 4965000() : OPT PUBLIC SAFETY DtiTA PROCESSIt. 2 93 Mb 9 293Mb9 10/30/84 1Q/3L/94 4786.50 MINN STATE T2E AS415.00 5,201.50 ,STA TE TR_AS MOTOR VE# LIC MCTOR V£H LIC 295N50 U130/84 295N50 295N50 10/30/84 10 /3Q/84 35.22 49 Nei SELL TELEPHONE NW BELT. TELEPHONE TELPHON£ 295 h5 0 295 00, 10 /30/84 X9.42 4'57 Nw BELL TELEPH ^NE TETELEPHONEE - TPHONE 29SN50 10 /30/84 10 /3C /g4 36.49 Nei B LL TELEPHONE Nib BELL TE'LEPHtiNE 4TLEPHONE 295N50 295 N5 0 10/30 /$4 4.6? 62037 NW BELL TELEPHON Ec TELEPHONE C.TELCPlONE 295N50 10 13C/84 30/24 _._-10 33.43 N W BELLW. TELEPHONE hW BELL TELEPHONE T: -L%.PHONE 295N5 0 295N50 10 /30/84 45.1 5 3.93 NW BELL TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE Z95N5U 10/3Q/84 ww B = Lt. TtLEPNOHE 295 y50 1a /30!84 15 • 58 19091 TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 295450 1u /30/84 Q /3Q/84 -_._25, 79 Nw BELL TELEPHONE NW BELL TE'LEPtCNE T_ LEP+IQIYE 29 SNS 0 29SI5'10/30/84 l 0 425.95 H W BELL Tc L €P#pNE TELEPHON E TELEPHONE 295N50 101/30/84 14 /3Q/84 -74 902 Na BELL TELEPHONE E ,NW BLL TELEPHONc TELEP - 295A50 295lVSO 10 /30/84 15002 84933 hW BELL TELEPHONE TELEPHONE T EL =PHONE 295N5G 1013C/84 10/3C/84 b7.25 Nib B.LL TELEPHONE Aw 8LL TELEPHONE rT. LEQHONC. 295A 50 1D /3J/84 49.84 RV BELL TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 29.5N50 295N5 C 10/30/F4 49.80 15 02 Nw BELL TELEPHONE yTELEPHONE TFLEPH3E 295450 1t /3 /84 1C /30/84 13.12 NW 8SLL TEL EPHONE NW BELL TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 295450 295450 1L/30/84 _.. -._. .._.._._47.3D NW BELL TELEPHONE Tr EPL.. HONE TcLEP#aONc 295 1!5 Q tD/30/84 13 /30/84 49.80 N B_LL TELEPHONE NW BELL TELEPHONc TELEPHONE 295 295450 10/30/84 .__i9.80 114.99 NW BELL TELEPHON E TELEPHONE TELEPHON E 295ti50 10/3C/86 10/30/P4 SS.JB Nw BELL TELEPHONE WW BELL TELEPHONE TELEPHONEHON,. _. 295N50 2951450 _._ 10/30/84 4• 58 17.52 Nw B`ELL TELEPfiJNE TELE PH0N r T _ ..E LEPHONE 295N50 410 / .. C / 8 4 ._. __ .. 30/84 15.0 2 _ ,_.. _15902 N i 8 L L TELEPHONE w BIL 7ELEPHCNE T EL EPm O N€ 295N50 295N50 10 /33/84 - _....1T.1 B 12 Q2 Nw BELL TELEPHONE T EL _PiONt TELEPHONE s 295ti50 t0 /301 /84 10/30/84 15002 NW BELL TE'LEPMaNE ti BELL TELPHCN TELEPHONE . 14072 1.904.04 *_ RW BELL TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE H_ Ie 1984 CITY OF MAFLEUCOD CIHECK REGYST:.R CHECK .h C._DATE . _. _. -. - . __ _.__..AMOUNT,._ __. ..__. _VENDC°ITEM OESCRIPTp 296314 10130/84 8 _ _ _E R _K8L40 PA DEE UR A NCINSURANCEE 296 314 10/30/84 17 90 48, 90 EK @LAO PA? DEE INSURANCE 25 • T 37 . P0 296AO5 10 /30/84 335 90 FA SC ME UNION DUES -PSL 296 A 0 10/3c/E4 - -5.32 Af SCMc UhI CN DU S 08L I 341922 296035_10 /34C /84 14056.50 CITY CNTY CR UNION CPEDIT UNION PE 14 X356.50 296C36 1 U /30 /84 _. - -1,1 To RO _ _CARE ANIMAL CoaTR ANIMAL C ONTROL 1 •178.0 296115 10/39/84 2 r6 ICMA DEFERRED COM F 296 -10 /3%/84 505.74 . -ICMA _DEFERRED COMP F 3076e76 296M20 1613C /p4 873.69 MINN ST TREAS SURTAX SUR TAX PEL 296M20 1C /3a/84 17.47•MINN STl TREA SURTAX(SUR TAX PSL 296M35 10 /3C /84 288.75 MN BCNEFIT ASSOC P/R DtDUCT 2$.75 litti! 2961052 1C /30/ -149703.5T 14N F= DEIRAL SAVINGS FWT PBL 296M52 1C /=010/84 337.50 PINK FEIDERAL SAVINGS SAVINGS BONDS 15 9 .0 7 _ * _ . 2961061 - __._.10/30/84 +310.0D _.MN MUTUAL LIFE INS INSURANCE 310 : ^0 2961 _10130/84 7,889.67.__. _MN ST COMM R,.VENU_SaT PBL 79889.67 a 296 M69 10 /30/84 15.7 MN ST RETIREMENT DEFERRED COMP E s 1984 CITY OF MAFLEYCOD CHECK REGISTER. CHECK NO.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 296M69 1U130/84 59995.95 MINN STAT TRIAS MOTOR VE#i LI Pe2961 _10 /3U /e4 102000 MINN STIATE TREAS MOTOR VEH LIC PB296106910/3r/94 5100 MINK STATE TREAS MOTOR VEH LIC Pe29610691G/3U/84 351 *00 MINN S71AT: TRW AS MOTOR VEH LIC Pe296M691U /30/84 321 P- 1 N4 Sl TR €ASURER MOTOR VE LIC Pe296106910/30/84 9,23 MN ST XTIRE+MENT DEFERRED CCMP P8. 6 9845.95 296M70 10 /30 4 3, 916.29 MN ST TREAS S/S S/S PBL296107010 /30/84 49091.63 PN ST TREAS S/S SIS PBL 89007 02 296N5 ^10/30/84 1.231 .3T NJ BELL TELEPHONE T= LEPPONE 296SC5 10/3c/84 18.24 S & T OFFICE SUPPLIES29650510/30/84 3$.42 S 9 T OFFICE SUPPLIES 296S05 10/30/84 16.80 S & T OFFICE SUPPLIES 73 *46 t 296U76"1J/30/54 250.nD UNITED ARTIST PROGRAMS 2 50.00 296 Y 25 10/30/84 157o40 w I SC DEPT R E YE'N UE S WT P8L 157.40 2971020 1U/30/8+4 17CJ0.DD METRO WASTE CONTROL SAC P9L29711U/3C/84 1TG.00•METRO WASTE C CNTR OL SAC PBL 16,v 830.00 s :r *ti 297P69 10../30/P4 59185.62 MN ST TREAS MOTOR VEH LIC Pc 5 , 1 `85.62 S.AD CLERK OF COURT OPTY FEES 115.00 f 298L1..7 13/30./84 2 35.71 LABELL ES SUPPLIES 235971 * 1984 CITY OF MA*FLE16000 CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO•DATE AMDUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION X98 N4 5 10 / 30 I8 4 9.0 0 P. A. M. A.TRA Vc`L ? R /, t N 1h.6 9.00 2981 101 30/e4 4072.0fl PN ST TREAS MCTOR WEN LIC PB298x6910/34/8;303.00 PW ST TREAS MOTOR VEH Lrc PB 29BM69 10/30/84 12.53 MN ST TREAS BGOKS 49487.50 298809 10/30/84 90000 RAPS:.Y CO COMM HUMAN TRAVEL TRAINING 90.00 299591 IU/3U/84 330.00 HOME DISTR SERV PROGRAMS 33340 300521 «10/30/84 -211255 '*54 --N. E. So As SOCCER OFFICIALS 2.255.50 3UU590 1G/30/8 3D .D0 AMER HEART ASSN RE6iSTRATICN 300E64 10130 /d4 1, 000 *00 EMPLOYcE 3ENEFIT DENTAL DEPOSIT 3UOM69 Its /30/84 4,MINN ST TREAS MOTOR WEN L C Pc 30OM69 IQ 3C /84 24'3 .00 MINN ST TREAS MOTOR YEN LIC p= 4.364.07 + 30OP95 10/317/84 200.00 MRPA 84 CONFERENCE 30OP95 10%30/P4 1000100 MRPA 84 CONFERENCE 300 .^ 0 3U 3M69 10/31/8.063.41 MINN STt TR.--.AS MI OR WE LIC Pi 30M69 10131/84 478900 PrNN S1l TREAS MOTOR WEN LIC Ps P-4 7 t 1984 CITY OF MAPL,EWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK h0.DATE AMOUNT _.VE NDCR ITEM. DESCRIPTION 304080 3U4080 1+I3i /84 2Q.00 MUNICIPALS TRA VE L TR AINI16 , 3CI4U 8 V 10 /31 / P 4 60.00 MUNICIPALS MUNICIPALS TRA VE'!. 3C4080 3U4U80 10/31/84 U131/84 f 20.Q0 MUNIIPALS TRAVEL TRAINING TRAVEL TRAItiING 304U8U 10/31/84 10•Q © 40.30 MIiNICZMAL.S TRAY; L TRAINING 304U 80 1 /31 10000 MUNICIPALS MUNI., I PA LS RAVEL. TRAINING TRAVEL TRAINING 304595 10/31/84 4040 O R Tip ONA REFUND 304596 10/31184 64.00 ER ICKSDN RA ARGN REFUND64.00 : 3041069 304M69 10/31/84 13 /31 / 84 99647,68 32loOO MINN STATE TREASURER MOTOR v EN LZ C PE 9 MINN STATC TREASURER MOTOR EVtH LIC P89968.68 * 304M75 10/31/84 25.75 MIN TEAMSTERS t1 NI a1V OU t S P 8!.E25.75 05F69 305x69 10/31/84 10/3'1/84 3,b1,12 326.30 MINN STATE TREAS MOTOR VEH L IC 8 9.007.12 MINN SUITE TRE AS MOTOR VEH LIC D 8 48322 48'322 10130/84 10/30/84 5000• SQ 00 6123 tlBURBAN PLBG 6123 SUBURBAN P18 6QO 1 FS 9466.64 FUND 01 TOTAL GENtRALE 7T9.4T FUND 03 TOTAL HYDRANT CHARGE995e23 43 X103.05 FUNS? 90 TOTAL FUND 92 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER F oD 0.0 0 w . _ _ FUND 9 4 TOTAL PAYROLL BENEFIT DENTAL SELF - I N SL' t 14,972 FUND 96 TOTAL VENZCLE 8 EQUIP 215 9 359.1 T CT L NEC_ES SARY EXPEN -w .F _ L.T_._LINCIL MEETLNG t f ACCOUNTS PAYABLE NOVEMBER -8 - Z - 4 . Page 1 198 4 CITY OF MAPLE W )'10 CHECK Rcal STER CHECK N'1, OA:TE _ AMOUNT UrNO ITEM DES "PIP'10%, 313a ":4 11/"'2/P4 200'1 HEALTH RESf3URC_S CONTRACT PYM 313Jj4 11/'2/84 669N) HEALTH RES3URCES CONTRACT PYM 86.0 - 0 4 D 'P!_ BIE U 't -1 y v 313125 11/22/84 - - 175,w0 CORPORATE RISK MANG CONTRACT PYM 175.00 ttttf 313159 11/92/84 36900 FRAIR IE pEs3TRATI34N SUPFL',ES 313172 11 /::2/84 436.95 AQUATRJL 14C R AT": 43 6.95 t - 3131 86 11/02/84 - - 3500 M_EHAN JAM =S CANTN :ALLY WAAC= 35.3 O t 313232 _ 11 /T 2/84 FLF -XIBLE PIPE &TCGL SUPPLIE 1 320.DID 313274 11/,:2/84 '15.59• SHERWTN WILLIAMS SUPPLIES 313274 11/ -2/84 54.89 \ SHERWIN WILLIAIvS SUPFLIrS t 39.3 31334U 11/r -2 /F4 141.30 MIDW FENC^ b MFG SUPPLIES 31334v 11/02/84 _._ 161.85lIDW'ST FE'Cr & "MFG SUPPLIES 302,85 3135:3 11/02/84 59,80 FAYETTE Jr-AN _MT INSTRUCTOR 5 9.8 * - Sw 02 P4 9, 8 I _ TE G<EY EM ySTR ' 313 .4 1 1 _ R 5 .33 1 YET TT c T 31 _ . P4 - - - MT RJ 1 1 / 49 3 PAYr f S L ?rS 2 E, 3 1984 CITY OF MAPLEU00D CHECK R;GTSTER CHECK NJ.DATE _...AMOUVT .__..__ _V`-No3? w -- -..ITEM! DESCRIP „ ON 313597 1 1 /C 2/8 4 68, 70 AMERC IAN STORED NT INSTRUCT 4'? 68.70 313 598 i 1 /E2 / P4 31 .4 8 AUTQ VOTMi MACH 0 CCN TR ACT FYM 31948 + w*i 313599 11/02/84 36.013 BURT DEB EFUND 36.00 wf. 1ti 3136; 0 11 /02 E4 141 •99 BURLINGOTCN NOKTH— P'REFUND. 1 41.9 9 t 37 ?6 1 11 /C2 /f4 31. R6 Bf?F SUB SCRIPT =CN 3106 31362 11/C2/f4 156010 CHAW1I04 4AF CORD SUPPLIES 1 56.10. 313 6 3 11 / 2/F4 1'6.'!9 CURTI£ *N)USTRIES SUPPLIES 76 r'9 31 36U 4 1 114 CJ84 197,61'CCS COPP SUPPL :E3 197.67 3136._5 °11/ 2/84 10. ^C YDRE_R STEVE F,tFUNO 3136 6 11/C2/84 29327.61 FIRE SAFETY PROD SUPPLIES 3 2 T . 6.1 31 36%i_7 II/C2/84 24.55 F. W. WOOLW','RTH SUPPL IcS 313 6..* 8 11 /'5.1 5 GREEN PHYLLIS TRAV L TRAIN VIG 5.1 5 31 36 9 11/02/84 1J0?C PARDEE'S SR BOYS REFUND 31 361+1 `1 1 /218 209 IFELEY ROL'! ti0 REFUND 20 . ^' + 31 361 1 1 7 /C 2 /84 18 . DD H "I NI LAGER LAM ?LL r a Rr UND 4 313612 11/ ^2/84 49,95 HOMOLAS SHOE STOR=Ul "Ii FORM" 49.95 + 313613 11 /02 /24'R_ 7 U F:ELL' SERVICES REPA,P MAINT 313614:11/C2/84 18.00 KEIS LINDA REFU40 t 1984 CITY OF MAFLEWCOD CHECK REG ?BIER CHECK Nis DATE _..... _...AMOUN V E'N D0 ITEM D c. 4 %. RIP ?'I Ot 313615 1 1/ 0 2/ 8 4 S.Q KcSSL_R VICKI REFUND 18.70 313616 A ic - - -KOHN .. E ANN CEI UNL 1 8.10 31 361 7 1 - 1 /x'2/84 87 - -LAKELIND - CO SUPPLIES 87.00 313618 11/02 .415 . - .0. ___-LEES TAXTD =RMY SUPPLI 415.00 313619 11/02/E4 13.883 LEFT& :.:bTGNT BOWLING SUPPLIES 1300 31362)11/ .12/84 19 8,0 1 C -SUPPLIES 198,70 313621 11/ 2/84 33.63 w f4oA.D.H ?USE SUPPL;cS 30.63 313622 11 /0 2/8 1_1.6.3 6 MIDWAY CH: iI SUPPLIES 16.36 313623 313623 11 /t 2 /84 11/Cs2/84 425.00 E?:LE HnMc: OF M14 R FUy0 313623 11/02/84 15C'.C.9 199. J_: ML HOMES OF MN ILA ZM.S OF MN' REFUNO Nt'j774.70 313624 1 1 GZ /8!4 18 • -''3 MULVAM Y KZM R= F UN 0 313625 1142/84 ^_210 :0 kATU:tE PRESERVED SUPPLIESL , _ S213.7 0 313626 1 1 /C2 / F4 174 *11 NA TL C4 PSEARCH SUPPLTES 174.11 : 313627 O 11/02/84 18.''0 NELS'N 6LORIS R: 313628 "_.._..C =7%p4 1 0 _NEWMA N PAM EFU%D 313629 _. 31 3629 11 /02/p4 11 /Q2/84 38.76 N CRTH LIA N - 'TES 2.1 9-NORTHL ANC E LEC SUPPLIES 36.5 7 *. 31363v 11%G2/84 49.50 K30THSTAR, IH' --SUPPLIES 49.50 f 313631 11 /C2 4 25o63 PAFrR CALMEhS CN ..- -__SUP PLZcS 425.63 If 1984 CITY 3F MAPLE WCOD CHECK REGISTrR CHECK N l.CA T N?'MOU ITEM D - ESC.PIPT.ON 313632 11/02/84 417.90 QDLc'S r M IDLANI D SUPPLIESx.17.9 7 373633 _ 313633 11/C2/84 __ 1 f/02/8y 2 -' _.. _._..SC "A T A Fuel 0i.1:33. R1 SHADT AL TRAVEL TRAI''ji 3 313634 1 1/2 /84 1204IQ _SCH JEI NN£TRAVELTRAVEL TP AZ'V 4G12. 6 313635 11/C2/.y• -_sr- N1.3 SM ^ y// 'S v7ER KA .1y TTRAVEL `RA'w,v!%!G1E.010 : 313636 SlI__. -V_L TRAIF..41 G fi 11 3 13.637 SUEtlRIAN HTG.qrFU1fD 513638 ;;11 r2 E l70 TRt;MgCaEA D0KCTH1f F U aJ17, t 313639 's 11/C2184 5, - 3 rVI _TOR L311A I',E rRZFU 05oF3 P*1 31 364::1 1 2/4 -- _1 tin Call r`PFU'4 313A45 i 7.53 AM!'R rLANN _NG ASS w R7.50 t 313A66 11lr_21p4 27 *606D APPLIANCE REPAIR CTR SUPPLrES27.60 r 313A64; 313A69 184 11/C1 /84 41.65 62993 R N S ALTO S ^RV _F,"'F A : N AI;T t'E 31 i 1 /;1134 184.5 AR" AUTO O S - •V c cAR!1AL_. AUT3 S cV P Mt.NT VEH 313A69 313Ab9 11/Cl/E4 11/y1/4 56.0 5 ARNALS AuT ^ SF RV Rr- .1 ° MA:NT M ;!vTpf VEH V -, 31 3469 _11 /L 1_ 4 125.!53 66.64 AR kAL,S AUT o0J _ 2V REP A i c MA -VEH 313A69 11%C 1, ___ ___ ___.._31.R^ _____ -- AR *:BLS O StAUTV _ c sIR MAI!,T VEN 313469 11/01/84 21. 5 A.R1 ;ALc AUTO ..t O S _gV AR+IALS AUTO S-4 REPAIR yATNT VEH 313A69 313A69 11x01/84 _ _ ... 11/1/84 21.75 _._..APN- ALS AUTO SFRW REPA MA INT R.-{ AI. MAItiT VEH. 313 x6 9 11/01/84 1 3 2 5 A1ALS AlT0 SCDy REP &IR MA07NT t:h V_H 313A69 11/U'1/R4 31 a S AR NAL^ AUT'% SEPV RERA T.R MA INT VEH 31 3 d b 9 11 / 1 S 4 a R A L A U T ? S? V 21.75 R = PA I= M K :U T V E t 313A69 11 / "1 1F4 21.75 AR'IaLS AUTO SERV RPAIR MA:NT V£H pAr1hAUTOSEF,V R AI; MHINT VEF Y 19414 C I T Y F MA PL Z. W 30 CHECK NC. DATE CMcCK REGIST'P AMOUNT VENDOR TEM DE';;CP,iPT-Oh 1 s C 15.31' +r 313815 31 3p1 5 11/02/84 11/02!84 49.50 EATr-R TIRE WrSE 31 3 31 321 5 11/ ^2/84 10.16 21 *94TTC,RY TIRE whSE SUPPLIESPLIES SU?F ccLT.11102/30.4 EATT RY TIRt WhSE c ^ E F ; E 111.62 t 9A TT= .RY TIRE WHSE UPP, SUPPt? c tft* t 313845 84 269015 269, 05 t 93ARn OF WA TER CO'1M OVERL 313852 11/02/34 -- ___ b2.f00 ER ISM MA N"K_NN_ 062 *J t SUP • -^FLIES 31 395 5 31 3E55 111 /8 4 11 /;;2lEt - - -2.5^QRC i'J P -Hl. 0 31 385 5 11/ 62/84 36 BROWN PMOT. SUPPLIES 9 +45 pa G wti P N T;1 SUPPLrE 48.95 SUPcLTES 313045 11/O2/84 _21 35 21935 +CH S?ORI NSS WAT = 313CS5 11 /2/R4 201 55 _ 201.55 * COPY OUPLC I''!6 r. p - <,.U LICA':•u C' STS 313 hr. 2 184 87.48 87.48 t C'LLItiS EL =CTkie L - CTRTCAL 07=1 t* tt 31 3 C 9 2 1 1 /0 218 4 5.64 5.64 • CaUNTR.Y ST JRE 476 S UP P L ! ES 313036' 6.,.1Q OALCO 6.Q *SUPPLIES 313037 - - ---_1 /n 2 X84 6. •. 4 6 .._......___. 65.4b DATA . I S P - T C N I -- - -.- --DELIV.R SE4V:CE tt* t t • fP P p 1984 CITY OF MAPLEWJOD CHECK RESISTER CHECK--N-09.DATE AMOUNT V =NDO ITEM DESCRIPI'TO,, 313C4U i 1 /2/g4...___522.36 0 OF P SFTY.COMP MAINT Cf 31304U 11/02/e4 342.10 DrPT OF PJ.BLrc SFTr SYTE lMS L "tiG :S 313 D4U 1) /C2 /84 4D.t Dr-'?T OF PJ BLI C SF TY CDMF MCI hT C t 904,35 313E 7 1 1 /n 2 /84 49.40 EASTMAN K3 DAK Cl DUPLICATING C'S" 313 E'. 7 1 1 /CZ 184 172.91 EASTMAN K DAK rQ CI:PLI CAT T KG CI' 313E 7 271.71 __._.._.__.TA KJAK L0 0UPLrCAT:tiG 0 : %S- 313 E' 7 11/02/84 234.66 EA STMA 1 KODAK C0 DUPLI CAT T NT C % S' 313Ef7 11/02/34 37.05 E K3DAK CO 0U L1 CATi *:G CAS' . 313t',) 7 1 1 /C2 /E4 247 *91 EASTM N KODAK CO DUPLI CAT TAG C''3' 313 EC 7 11/02/54 222.31 EASTMAN KU CC 0UPLI'CAT l' N COS' 1 X235. D 5 # 313 E25 1 1 /EZ /84 _ _..224o33 K fl UttL SUPPLIE S 224.03 31 3EE7 1/[2/84 1,44C.2d 0 3ROTH --RS &SDNS SUPPLIES 31 3 E 901 C 2 /..E 4 ._._._._._.11 /04/2 2 5 . 0 E Y A N S 8 4 R P _Y V H A L L O W A N C c 225-a-040 # 31 3_95 11 /0 I..36-E-Z RIDTNG RV CT SUPPLIES 313 E95 11/0-2/84 426.98 IE• 2 RIDING RV CTR SUPPL I ES 425.62 313 F -5 11/02/84 78 FAUST DAWEL TOAV_L. TRAIWiG 313 F?P 1 1 /^2/84 159. R1 FIX VALLEY SIGNS 159.81 tirii* t 313645 1 1 /C2 /84 1 90o 5 6 G1IDYEA R T I RE C O SUPPLIES VE'H 313 C45 11/x'2/84 44.50 GDnDYEA;R TIRE CO SUPPLIES VEM 31 3645 11/32/84 1 21•04 GflCDYEAR TIRE CO SUR ?L TES Y=H 313645 11/x2/84 117.04 GOOOrEAR TIRr CO SUPPLIES yEH 313G45 11/02/84 117.04 GOODY =AR T RE CO SUPPLIES VEH V 1984 CITY OF MAF GOD CHECK R E *GIST'R CHECK NO.D«TE __ - _ __.:.AMOUNT V =N04?I''EM DESCRIP "101 313G45 11 /.? /8 1 GDCDYEA.R TIRE CC SUPPLIES VEH 313G45 11/L2/84 _ _._86 _..G TIR= CO SUPPLIES VEH 313x45 11/02184 117.14 GOOD Y7AR TIRE CG SUPPLIES VEH 313G45 111 1 75.92 C0 41DY ^A R T IRE C'0 SUPPLIES VEH 313G45 111x2/84 1 1E3.42 GOGDY=Ap TIRE CG SUPPLIES VET 10326.52 31 3G57 11 /^2/84 5V) 0 GRACE DUAIE C CONSULT INSP 51 l.0 "u f 31 3H1 3 1 1 /2 /F 4 45. 5G I -ALr.. CO SiJrPL:ES 45.50 313P19 11102/F 10. n H NQY HITCH WELDING SLPFL_ES 10 Tj t 313H70 11/02/84 8.x'1 HORS+1ELL JUDITH TQ4V .L TRH =INING 3131-70 1 1/C2/84 5.22 S4 #.' J TRA V L TRAINI''G 14.3 313I26 1i /r2 /84 20.' 0 N " :ERLINE SUB SC IPTTflN 24. -0 313 ?u 11/P_2/E4 _._275.00 INDEPE'ND£NT #62 TRAV; L TRAIN ?'I6 275.00 313 _11 I /8 . ..._87• ?'S I HOUGi DI V SUPPLIES 313170 11/02!84 11.81 INCUSTRI AL SUPPLY Supplies 11,81 f 31 31F0 1 1 /02/ F 4 931.30 I TASC A E 0J IP _SUPPLIES 931,30 C ' 3,11 /t2/84 9T 9 KNEX _LUM9 =R SUPPLIES 1904 CITY JF MAFLEWOOD CM:CK RC TST"R CHECK NPJ. OA TE 31 3K55 111'C21p4 ITcwE3CRiT't ± 89017 187.14 KNDX LUMflER SUPPL*_'- J 313K56 7.33 33 * KNOWL8NDS cUPPL ES t 313116 3130 1 11 C2/84 111'12 /R4 i2Cti LS Q4P '1 +tI GAN KLY CONTrACT P313L1611J:'2/g4 bb.9L 1 LA S 9ANNTGA4 KLY Y4 n. TCT F Y'37 3 L16 1 Z1l jRy 25 112.5 L' IS RA:NV GAh KLY IS CCNTR ACT zYM 1 : * LA gA:NN' r,AN KLY CM TR ,CT Fym 313L28 11/ ;2/84 35 ' 35.3 f .._.. LANG RICHARD CAN I; :_ CLLjW tttt 31 3L31 1 1 /02 /R4 Z9670.30 LFAGU OF AN CITi «c Sl13SCR r F T - , 313 L In i 1 / C2 /84 1 Rx 34313L7r11/02/R4 6462 L GIS LGIS R p r5_RV 0 ° S =vz CCU 313N_5 313N.5 11 /r2 4 11/ J2 /A4 162.1 _q SUPPLY 86.76 MR SUPPLY 5U ?PL?t 248.87 #ALA °LIE'S 31 31J59 1 1 r i iP4 57, *96 9 6 Nl SflTA BLUEP SUPPL S 313M79 313M79 11 /2/ 84 182.'3a _.M"I UC FUNJ 4.39•N a U,. FJ N JAEPL C4MD 1 77 t61 J "_Mc L0 COMP 31 3 M p6 1 i /C2 / 84__._72 8O 72.80 SUPPLIES f 313 M 9'-11/x2/8 4 991 0i MOT11 OL IN VHF RADT 1 e : 9 1984 CITY OF MA FLEW 010 CH +CK rsI Sr! CHECK NO.HATE A!AOUNT.._...ITEM OESCRIPTTON 31 3M9C 111:2 /84 1,310.lo NO TOP. 3LA I NC VHF RA 2,001r r :tffi 44 ' 1 313 94 14 _ A 4 11 J /8 962 . T N M.48 S:PLZ Sr 3131I30 31 3N3C 1 1/?2 1 483.00 A ^P,TH ST PAUL L'ITY UTILITIES 53olO NIRTA ST 3 AUL.CITY UTILITIES 1,536.90 f 31 313+l:;11!x2/84 134.65 1 043 N. S. p.UTILI TI 313N8::11/x.2/84 14 9.84 h'. S.P.UTILITIES U313r 313A'9' 11I 11/'2/H4 Z•4O 2,40 N.S.• 0 UTI LTI_S 313h3_11/ ;.72/84 _.2. A . 9 S.r. tJTILITI'" UTILITIES313ti? 313o h;ti 11/n2 /fib 1 1 / 2/P4 353 N.S.P.UTILITIES 31 3!± p i 1 1 /"2 / P4 2.40 2.43 N.S.P. N'.5.. UTILITIES 313NF 31 3ti3f- 11/'_'2/94 2 S. ?• UTZ l.IT ZE c UT Ll TIcS111 ''2/P 4 116.46 N 13 p DTI L, TI313N71/"2/84 __..19493ocle N.c•?•UTIL.IT,?':.e I 313 fq 30 313 11 / 2/84 19483090 h• S -UT Al. Li T1 Sh11 /2/84 4E6.0 3 S.?.U T I L41 TI =S313IAt.11 /032. / F4 111 h .'SOD ,UTI LIT IE S313PO 31 3N 11/ r 2/$4 11/22/84 34 .7 38, Q1 A.:..P .UTILITIt 31 3NK 11 /C2 iP4 779 N.S.P. A.S, , UTI LIT.IES UTI LI TI='S3N. -:G 31 3 N 9- 111321 84 1 1 /'*2 / ?4 1fl6.9 b 6 N. P.UTI LTTIE c 313 #P`11/C2/ p4 59.31 83.61 h. S.P . j.?. UTI L. Ti..S UTILITIES313hPC 31 3NC 1 1 /C2/84 15Q. 4.25 i.S _UTILI 31 3N I I/C 49.2b A.S.P. N * . * TT rc a- IwoUr UTI LIT ES313A6 31319'C 11 /C2 /P b . Z S 11.x.?.UTILITIES 313119+] 11/02/84 1 1 /' z/ 8 4 41.26 6 h03)0 a UTI L.ZTIES 313'VA-D 313 11/ ^2 /p4 96.1 4.25 A. S. P. N.S.P. UTI L I T I E S UTiLITIEs%N rL 31 3h?z; 11 /%2 /84 1 1 /CZ /P4 15.15 4.25 h.S.P.UTILITIES 3 3%'8J 31 311?'' 1 1/C2/84 28007 k'gS._r. N. S • ._ __ . . - - -_ UTILITIE. S U Ti Li T? = S11 /':2 /84 24 7 .36 N.S.P.UTILITIES313N8 31 3NRC 11/C2/84 1 1 /: 2 /8 - 98.74 39.06 ti•c•p•UTILITIES 31 zNv 11/02/84 13.48 k.S. ht. C.p. UT It. I TI Ec- UTILITIES313NK _ 31 3 N 8 11V2/P4 11/02/84 __.. 4.25 34 31' PN._ S .UT? LZTTES t 313N8.11/102/84 11.82 h. S. o• N.S.i'. UT I L TI E S UTILI PA e: 1984 CITY OF MAPLEUO30 CHOCK R C PEC K NC.a TE a MOUNT ,............ -Y> ti Da Z TAM nI ,D T'C 31 U P-0 1 11 c 2 /F4 21 24 i.S.o.l3TI l_ TIc 3313N ?C 31 3NRL 11/^284 _ - - i 1/02/84 69.91 67.57 _ l. j. P+.UTILITIES t 313ti8u 11/02/F4 734.52 h.S.'. 11 %,W UT LIT`5o,31 _N?C.11./C2104 203 29 -_S.P. UTtLITI_;I UTIL TIES t 31 3h Q 31 311 ay 1 1 /?2 / 21 J. 613 I c .P, --UTZ LI , T I; S r 11 /C2 /84 182.16 14.S.Z •UT.LI TI:S313N'eL 11 /C'2 /8 4 -13.44 N CUTILTIF3136 31 3N 11/:2/84 152,73 11.5. ?..LTIITT.S11/C2/84 78088 5.'.UTIL T ?ES313h11/C2/'84 121.02 Al. 1TILITIES313; 31 3N81 11/"2lA, 11/x:2/84 95,x . 3 .... 9 21 c UTtLTTI ^S 31 U80 1 W2/F4 .. - -R. 2 3 N.' N1. S.P, uTll Z_s UTILITIES3121F476994A. S.p.UTI L: TI "= 11 9601.61 31 301C 11/T2184 _35.Q0 CDrGARD 01BERT D Q n35,0 313 F4L 111L`2184 r.43 PHr'TaS TO SC VO r TNTC tYM 8.43 313F45 11 /C2/8 74 eC- 0 PlITN Y BO ;S C FY4 74. C O 313P52 31 3F5 2 11 /t'2/ 84 11/02184 - ._.._ 92.22 11,89T''+ PJLA -P CHFV SUPPLTE FOLAI CHE V HICLE 11,989.22 313764 11 /C2/R4 _ - ..12,5 P?''TT4- - !R JISEPH TFA V,L TR ti_'IG12.5 t 313x75 11/12/84 1 ?J.C1 FT AC t. - - ..R44 VcL TP II N 3 11/02/84 40.05 PUMP METER oo Isu. L..s v H 4 7.45 313P'..9 11/C2/84 _.._- _ _82 RAVSFY CCJNTY _PPSU LIES 1984 CITY JF MAHLE 100D Ct4ECK R£GTSTER CHECK NC. D _.:A MOUNT V-NaC ITEI OEaCRIPTLO31349 31 3R 9 1 1 / 2/84 1 1 /C.2/84 32.00 RA MSEY COUNTY SUPPLIESb•b RA PS Y COUNTY SUPOL t£S 313427 313 i 1/ 0"2/84 i 1 /v2 /P4 66.9 15. rte• .. .. _RE! :m.11 SALS SERVICECs.SUPPLI ES 313~7.7 11 /u /Fy 23.1 S F`ECS SAL:fS SERVIC=SUPPLIES 104. 64 OS SAL =s SFRV Cc SUS ?LT S 33304] 31 3R4 11/C2 /84 1 1 !c 2/4 4.50 Ai C£ ST r"R_.. T CAR MASH CAR MASH 33 304C-11/ 2184 126.: ST .E. ..T CAR WASH CAR WASH+ 313F4u 1 1/CZl84 1 RjCE STRz_T CAR 1ASH T, R •CAR iS.i- 313 40 1 1 /C 2184 4, 50 tR:..E S ; RECt CAR QSH Cha 1 3 155.450 F? C£ STRE-M= T CAA WASH CAR WAS+ 31 3R 49 11 /J") b4 _75, 45 cn - ,F,_iSC_175.45 SUPPL'FS 3135:.!2 313c` }2J `11/'2/84 2. C SM.) LICK & SAF SUPQL_ES 313 S Z 1 1 /x2/84. __ _. _4$` AS S &C LOSELOCK &SA c toSUrPL Icy 313Sj2 11/2184 48 R LOCK &SAFF SUPPLIES 313 2 11 /32/04 48.85 5 &C LOCK gSAFE .SUPPL TES S13S 2 11/:2/84 4g,R5 S &O LIC &SAFL SUPFLIcS 135;,2 11 1C2 /R4 48,5• S &0 LOC K &SAFE S UP P L SE 313 '! 2 1 1/x2 a48. 5 cg C LOCK &SAFE SUFPL1EIS SI3'.2 11/ 2/84 48.8.5-- S &O LOCK &SAFT'SUPPLIES S13S.,2 11/'`2/44 48.3E SBJ LK USAF-SUP PLIE 199.63 : S$i LOCK KS A«SUPPLIES 11.11 SAR6FNTimW :LCH SUPPLIES 37 3 39 11 !2 334. R5 _._:_-c ,S40RT LLIOT HENO CONTRA%.T PYH334.85 * 31 3S4;;11/02/84 139,75 c cCHO._LL9MAOSON INC139. ?S * - --CO - PYH 313545 t .8 SOLIDIFICATION INC TcLEVTSE LINES) 19b4 CITY OF MAPLE 6030 CHECK REGISTER CHECK !V.DATE 49UNT...__.VENfl0 ITEM DESCRIf- 0' 1 ,7e8, R4 31315 31?Sg 1 /f72/84 17/'2/84 15'.' _. 74,•.,,, Sr PAUL * TC _ Y OF TPA VEL TR.IhI ; 31 3558 1 1 /_.2 /E4 74.J ST PAUL CITY ST P; UL CITY C' C F SUPPLIES VEHS 31 3556 31 315% 1 /w 2/84 1 1 /.2/ Q4 __ _ _- 295 . C'S7 PAUL C I Tr OF TUPPL ES VEw A O I 0 a tiT 313 ..5ES.1 1 /2/4 336.95 zC6.2C ST PAUL CITY DF It1NQ M. I dT 31 3S 5 111n.21 - --69 A tSTPAULC.TY ST P*tS L CITY C= nF VAG MAhT 31 3S5R 313 SA 11 /r2/ 4 1 1/L2/84 9 • r _ .__..690 0 T PAUL CITY OF AD "1 MA T RADIO MAITb9,'? 1 •305 •15 f ST P! UL C' T Y uF c +D I 0 MA IhiT 313 .57 11 /'i 2 /8 4 39 •,ST PAUL W TAMP WORKS SUPPLIES9.60 313cE2 3'13 S 82 11/ 2 / __ 1 1/r 2 I84 5 10 -STATE' OF MN Q CT 300 KS6 ^, 1'STAT_ JF Wi OCT 3 J0 KS65,E 313SY4 11lC21P4 _ _35.9n S:'- 35. j. t CANTti_ ALLOWpNC_ 31 3S9 3 3S9j 1 1 /2 2/E4 1 1 /`_2/84 2.59 SUP1R MEOTCA FUt L OIL 31 369 11r21 4r 11.42 2623.b0 SUPEIAM_R "A F!!L OIL 313 1 1 /x.,2/84 74 SUPrRA,MERICA FUE OI 313S9 1'1/'2/84 60.32 SUPFR,MERICA FUEL OIL 31 3 S. 9 1 1 /;2/84 31699 SuFERAMER:CA FUEL CAL 313!! 9C 71102 /A4 119071 E?SUERAME ?ICA FUEL 0iL 31 zsgr.1 1 /= 2184 9 SU tM PICA c FUEL OIL 313S9,11/x.2/ 16 V113.t53 __ cF A R*METVA FU CTL 3i 39 r71 ! .2/84 121. ? SU _RAMC .CA SUPER FU =L OIL 31 3S9u --1 1 /,;2/84 1 ? 77 AMERICA t • nFJ..L IL 31 319 31 11 /::2/84 _..__141. 8 SUFERA M=z l A z aTSUF_RAME CA FU COIL 359 ;1 1 /L 2/8 4 7q, 47 St.,ic _ ,,RA ME -A FUEL. IL FuL. AIL 31 319 1 1 /.2 /84 3b 22.25 SUFFRAMEq C A cFUEWL CI L 313 S9 11/^21 4 12.28 SUz rRAMERICA SUP EI AM_PICA FUEL, ©IL 313 S9:: 3135 11 /C2/84 11/c/84 __._.. 29, ?5 S UPER+ MERTc a FUEL. OIL. t 0IL 31 3S9;,11 /t'2/84 182. 68,93 UP =RA MES. ACA FUE FUEL Ou 313S9 -r11 /r 2 /84 ___62 7 SUFERAMEDICA SUPERAMERI CA FUEL. OIL 31 339`; 313S9[ 1 1 l l 4 11/12/ 84 51 .38 SUFR AMER TEA FALL oIL FUEL OIL9063SUaERAM_P r A FUEL CIL 1984 CITY OF MArLE6CC? CHECK R FGIS TARCHECKN1. 00: TL A MOU N* 31 3%1 1 !'?2/86 V %0 ITEM dEsCRZP TI ON 31 3I9 11 /C2 /4 34.05 26 F 1 SUPFRAMEQICA F U£ L 11 . 1 L 's 31 3S 9C 31 ?59 1 1 /, --2 / 4 1 1 /'' 2 X 34'15 f .„SUP -R.. MER LA SUPER a MER ICA FUEL OIL 313cG-11/`'2 /R4 17't 21 0 SUKAMLo'C FUEL : - IL FUEL 4I1313590 31 11 /02/.84 23.60 SiJFF; IMEF *CA FUEL OIL309;;11 /12/84 *9 73 ASUF_RAME0 ,A FULL O313s911 /L 2 /R4 q'SUPrR4 ME ?ACA FUEL ;L31390 313S9- 1 1 /12/F4 11/ ZJ84 Z9 11.32 SUFER MLR'A SUFERA *CA FU_L OIL 31359 11/'2/84 23.13 5 r_ , SUPrRA14cQ %0 FUE 0** 1 L FUEL 01 L3139S 3135 ii /C2 /-y 11 /r 2'/84 37.05 SUPr1 A, MT R t _ A ct tc .su "QAMEPICa FUEL OIL 31 3So„1 1 /L 2/8 4 3 .14 49 1 0 Si1o£K,M oTCA FU L vIL FUE OIL313S9, 3) 9 11 / 2 / 8 4 1 1 /..2 /R4 12 SU E'R M£4 I A SU= ' 4ME "ICA FU_ , IL 31 359:11 /:21Q 2.36 b6 /, 4 e- - TS,F..RtitR...A F9EL O FU.L C IL313cqr 313 ,S9u 11/_2/84 11/02/84 32.45 S UPFIR 4 ME R 'Jr. A cUPR4M PICA Ft3` L rIL 313590 11 / 2/84 1R, 3T• 96 sUF - MER FUEL OIL FUEL DIL313 :-1 1 lil2 /:R 4 35935 SUp'p TMER _ CA FUEL OIL, 1 X96.91 :SU07 TCA FUEL 31L 1 313T29 1 1 /L /4 321 ' 321. P^ f T.A.S ^NsF;KY 5:'VS 313 T 3 1-2 E4 5.38 5 ,3 R *SUPPL TES 31 3T4 11 /2/54 33.54 33.54 # TA.U8M4N 01USLAS SUPPLIES 313''5 11/.c/4 --1 _ _T"C'FSON f'VTERPRISES144.99 t SUPPLTE,4- 31 3 *3C 1896 1 R.6O TOLL WE'LO INS SUPP cSUPPLIE,. 31 3T8D 18.16 X * 16 + _ _ _ TRUCK UT IL : TI''S MFG c i.1P PL I ES 313793 43* 75 43,75 t TWIN CITY FILTER_SUPPLIES i t e /y l 1984 CITY OF MAPS= WCOC CHECK RF-GISTER CHECK NG•.4T .SOU! _.;__... _ _.V`NOOR LT M QESCriZ ?T.O . 31 3050 11 /.2/84 1 1 * 75 UNIFORMS J NLIMIT UNIFORMS 313L5,11/t2/84 5 ''• *7 . _.UJ'F J LIB! TES SUP ?L.ES 31 3 U 5u'*11/0.'2/E4 374.n5 UNIFC JNLIMITED UNIFOPM.S 313 L5 11 /C2/84 5 0.8^UN1 RMS NLI1!iTL0 UNZF3PMS 31 3U5-1 1 /x2/84_ _.75.5 UttTF K'S UNLIM'TEO Ui1Z FORMS 5 69.1 3 313t86 11 /C2/84 2702 UNIVERSAL MEDICAL OXV GcN 27.2 313VSC 11/ZI84 16th. ^r V:RT'J PRINTI SUPPLIES 313V5 11!,:2/84 15080 VIRTUE PRINTING SUPPLIES 175.RJ j 31 3W21 11/ 2/R4 7. Z5 w4r'cN'RS TRUE V LU SUPPLIES 313W21 11 / 2/84 3C.8i W.%RN-RS T?UE WALU SUPPLIES 33 *06 31 362u -_ 11 /''2/84 1 9509'20 DASH SERVICE CORP REFUND 31 3W3.:11 / Z /84 2.54 . +WA TFR PRG)UCTS C3 SUPPL 2.547.:0 31 3w7 ;11 / "2/84 62 WINFIELD '4ITCrl =LL CJNTR4CT GYM 313478 11 /C4"/8 4 - -_1,225. ^C YC ^D3URY MtCi INC SUPPLIES 1 • 225, - : Q 313 W91j 71 /: 2/.84 32 _W W i;P All NGLR SUPPLIES 32.51 + 313X3u 11 /22/84 125.38 XEROX DUPLICATiNG CAS 1984 CITY OF NAFLEWJOD CHICK REGISTER CHECK NC. OITE _ _AMOUNT -V NDO ITFM DESCRIPTO' 3113X3 11 /CLI 125037 XSROX OUPLICATThG CIS` 25 3.75 313 241 1 1 /G2 / P 4 151 .19 21EGLE? IhC OUPLI C AT Ltif CAS_ 151.19 414645 11/C2/24 _117.m4 GOODYEA '.R TIRE CO StJPPL ES tirH 414C45 11/02/84 117.'4 Gv?OYE- AR TIRE C0 SUMPLTES VEH 414G45 11 /tD2/84 140 * 54 501 DYFAR TIRE CC SUPPLIES VEH 414C-45 1 1 / C 218 4 6.53 GO 0 TA;R TIRE CC SUP PL: Ea V H 381,12 41 9 769.66 FU4D 01 TOT AL GEN E* AL 49227,52 FUND .03 TOTAL tiYDRA.*JT CHARGE 150073 FU40 10 TOTAL iZTER AVAIlA3IL: 1 459."3 rUy 0 11 TCT IL PARK CEVEL0Pvz- - 1 , 739 *05 FUND 12 TOTAL STRL T CONSTR S' 141.99 FU40 20 TOTAL 2.06.65 FUND 47 TOTAL T -13 HI LLV OCO 352.66 FUW)^ 65 TOTAL 31 -12 H3LLOW AT t 112.5^FUND 75 TOTAL t32 - 44 FFc LST /FZM" 4 9'?37..0 5 FU!yn 90 TOTZL SANTTARY SEW R F 177.51 IFU 92 TOT-:L P YRJLL BENE. jT 15 r?23.37 FUN D 96 TOTl VEHICLE EOL IP 70 , 2 36.0 6 T OT A L INDICATES ITaMS---FINANC -ED BY RECREATIONAL FEES t CITY OF MARL,EYOOO PAYROLL•CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8021 CHECK DATE 11 -02m84 PERIOD ENDING 10 -26.84 PAGE 1 r DEPT -NO EMPL•NO EMPLOYEE VANE CHECK -.%O AMOUNT CLEARED r'0002 484369611 REHM LOTS N 1029 -00001 459,00 t 0002 206242318 E VANS BARRY R 1029- 00002 _1, 376.31 t 0002 1 X835.31 1 0010 4 73664474 JAHH w0AV1 a J 1029 - 00003 97.23 t 0010 4 T3 900141 JOHNSON GREGORY R 1029 - G0004 0000 t x 0010 469586523 SJANSON•JR L.YLE E 1029 -0000S S50.24 t i 0010 647.47 • r 0012 357340166 CUDE LARRY J 1029 - 00.006 175.61 t 0012 470S20124 OOHERTT KATHLEEN M 1029.00007 81.74 t 0012 _471400908 IUER: "ER JOHN L 1029m00008 103994 0012 361.29 s h w.. _ , . w. ._...._ .__.. w......0021. ......w.469501074 FAUST_w_"._ _ w....,..__...... DANIEL. _.._..f 1029.00009 _.. .1 .028. 0021 469743719 NEVER NANCY E 1029w00010 0000 t x 0021 1902 8.4 i T........,., ....»..,""w 0022 ,. 0022 w_.w_w'_ .. 390444446 469200614 .._.__H AGEN _ MATHEY'S...._.w.... -- _. ARLI AE ALANA J K 1029.00011 1029.00012 4 88.26 539096 t t w. 0022 476704432 MOELLER MARGARET A 1029 - 00.013 0000 t x 1 0022 473327S50 VI 6NALO DELORE S A 1029 - 00014 464.88 t 0022 1 9 49 3.10 • n. r__.. .•1l..A.•M•._•... -_•..o.,M ...I..._ 0031 r 471322198 w_.•.....I....U• •. AURELIUS M w• •... LUCILL.E E M....A........w 1029- 00015 811.85 .`..t MIA..A...w.w.A*..wAU..! A.. +w. -M .wrww..... N.M • . L 1 __s 0431 41T4264616 SELVOG BETTY 0 1029- 0001.6 520.61 t t r..w_r_ . rr.. r... . r..+. wYrr. w_.......•. . r_• . »A.....r..•••...Mrr+.+..yo- ..,.. ... .... 0031 rwr 9332.46 • rr .._ ..w _ _ ... w. r.... .. ... .... -. 0033 4 77268389 GREEN PHYLLIS C 1029.00017 574053 t I r M.. _._.___...._......,._.._...T .....,..._- 0033 -._.. ---12244944 HENSLEY '-- ...__..PATRICiA r U 1029 -00018 ..1 86.65 -.._ .._t ___._._ ) ...,........,. 0033 476620541 KE LSE Y C ONN IE L 1029w00019 180.10 t 0033 476269815 SCHAOT JEANNE L 1029 173,61 t 0033 4 6836443 5 V IETOR LORRA I NE S 1029 -00 021 444.t w ^•_...••.......f ...,.y.,. .1....•_Y..w. 0033 w.w_w.. . . . «_... ....ww-w. .. ._. _. ......I. .. .w.... .... .. w. .q,..w+w...lr. ... ...w. .. -. .M'.. 1 • SS 9.12 w.w .._. ....M.w..Y w _••!_/. ... I.- f.awA.. • r!h••ti._.. .. . ..N 0034 474091528 STOTTL.EMYER EOITM G-1029.00022 39.20 t 0034 39.20 • 0041 466461i1T COLLINS KENNETH V 1029 - 00023 69.03 t 1. 00.41 •._ .,._.47T369263....MARTt NSON ` '..CAROL ' ".P w. 1029.00024 344037 t ........ 1 .....,._ ,_ 0041 41'532 31 K 3 NELSON ROBERT 0 1029 -00025 649.46 t t 0041 477227636 ONATN Jor E 1029 -00026 386.83 t 0041 4715023S6 RICHIE CAROLE L 1029-40027 365.S2 t 00.41 468602934 6 WEND SEN JOANNE M 1029.00028 559.23 t t ! M.......A...r1A..1...... _....ISAAi..w A- A..V. +.M.V. ...T - rylu.K.r... .. 0041 f•r._ . . 29374944 L CITY OF HA PLEM000 PAYROLL- CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8021 CHECK DATE 11.02.84 PERIOD ENDING 10.26.84 PAGE 2 QEPT•NO EMPLMNO EMPLOYEE NAME CHECK "NO AMOUNT CLEARED t 0042 477481364 ARNOLD DAVID L 1029.00029 321.19 t t+ ;0042 471402115 ATCHISON JOHN H 1029 -00030 711 t 0042 476721577 BA NI CK JOINN J 102 9. 000 31 512.31 t e 0042 470887418 BERSr.MRON JOSEPH A 1029.00 491.91 0042 4 72 721660 BOHL -JOHN ... C 1029.00033 503.09 t 0042 469689867 BOWMAN RICK A 102900034 649.66 4 0042 468461930 CLAUS Off DALE K 1029- 00035 761.33 t 1 0042 476446119 OREGER RICHARO C 1029 -00036 795.33 t 1 0042 470267887 GREEN NORMAN L 1029.00037 672.39 9 0042 469568516 PALWEG KEVIN R 10.29.00038 562.76 m. .. t q••_••+•..r•.A .r•Aww+r •w .• .. .. .- ._... . r•.... •r. w.w.Mw7 _.1._« 0042 473604916 w-.. ... HERBERV MICHAEL w... J .1029 - 00039 629.61 t 0.042 4 7222 2231 KORTUS OONA LO V 1029 - OOC40 414. E6 t 0042 _47156 3591 LA 1G RI CHARD i 102 9.00041 579o79 0042 4 76431 368 LEE ROGER Y 102 9-00 042 668.77 t 0042 474607686 MEEHAN9JR JAMES E 1029.00043 686.29 1 0042 469442063 MOESCHTER RICHARD N 10.29- 0004.4 277.40 0042 47634099.0 MORELLI RAYMOND.J 1029.00045 566.29 0042 469462884 PELTIER WILLIAM F 1029 6900046 671.72 0042 471564801 RYAN _MICHA P 1029 -00047 754.56 0042 470520457 SKALMAN DnNALD Y 1029 -00048 156.52 0042 473548226 STAFNE GREGORY L 1029.00049 711.02 0042 471721204 STEFFE SCOTT L 1029.00050 208.15 1.r.r.r... . _,••. . __ ,A.._w•.IY••. i...M•w. ./..•M .rI_..... •..r +.. _•'.•._•..••_ 0042 471500251 A.••. •w• _. _r..•. .• STILL VERNON T 1029.00051 698 .06 1 0042 471629204 STOCK TON OE:RR ELL T 1029-w0305.2 801.60 t 0042 471602052 T DAVID J 1029.00053 607.39 t 0042 415.363333 bILLIAMS DUANE J 1029.00054 477.1.2 0042 474260130 ZAPPA JCSEPH A 1029. 0055 795.47 t I 0042 s.6as.88• 0043 475548434 BECKER RONALD D 1029- 00056 330.39 t 1 ___......__ r_.•.... ___,,_ ._ _._ 0043 469441789 GR AF BAVI O N 1029.00057 612.04 0043 469520466 HEINZ STEPHEN J 1029 -00058 811 •C1 t 0043 392760009 KARTS FLINT D 1029 - x0059 104.36 w .. _...._... .. .. ..._....._......_.war•._. ww _.•.,. .. 0043 473567791 r..r.--- ,...._. MELANOER JON A 1029.00060 29.99 I i 0043 468363916 NELSON CAROL N 1029 -x0061 923.19 t 0043 471504316 RA ZSKAZOFF DALE E 1029- 00062 700• e9 0043 474486071 ORWER10 ROB €RT E 1029.00063 261.42 t 0043 469502201 TOUNGRDN JAMES 6 1029.00064 360.76 t 1 ri .w...w.. ..- .. .... .. w••...._w• w..•_t. •.. -... .r•••w .... w.•._..+w... -« _.. .. 0043 49134905 • w a . .mow. ++ter ..«... w «.. r.. , . • -_ . 004S 4 ?1401876 EMBERTSO&JAMES M 1029.00065 714.65 t 0045 47224222'7 SCPADT ALFRED C 1029.00066 789.12 1 Y .......•...,,,•.,...,_......004 1.1S0 3077 !w.._.00,,00 _ ...........,.... 0000. ._. 0046 468401899 CAMANES ANTHONY G 1029w00067 78.12 1 0046 4776ZY236 FLAU6M13R JAYNE L 1029 - 0006.8 462.30 0046 376709873 MADELL RAYMOND M 1.029 -00069 451.04 t r.. - ... .•...•... _.. ..._.... 0000 . __._ .. - 0046 000.0 ... 41380 70 30 MA RTI N r. .. ... SHAW P 1029-000070 4 47.64 1 1 0000__ - _.. _ w.• . .. _... _ CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL.•CHECKS ZEGISTER CYCLE 8021 CHECK DATE 11.0284 PERIOD ENDING 1046.84 PAGE 3 0EPT•N0 EM PL -a NO EMPLOWDE NAME CHECK•NO AMOUNT CLEAR 9046 472365919 NELSON.KAREN A 1029.00071 453.68 t f 3 0046 468600183 RASTNE JANET L 1029 - 00072 451.04 t i 0046 477700.322 STAHIKE JULIE A 1029 00073 372078 0046 29716e60 + 0051 4 7144 026 7 S ART A MARIE L 102 9 -OO O T4 241o90 t VOID - REPLACED Ck #1029 -00197 0051 4735668? 2 HAIDER KENNETH G 1029.00075 2.18 t 0051 5044831 ?4 NECWERTII JUDITH A 1029.00076 359 *96 t w +..- ......+w•...... _ ... -. ._... _.. ..... _w. +wt•+T..•Ir+•R- 0051 rr.w. w -. .....- r. -wr r......+ r. --.. ... .w..•... _..w.. .. ......_ ..- ..w -+w. •w .. . w •..... 604 *04 • rw _.. .. ..... _ . i OOS2 496308314 CASS WILLIAM C 1029.00077 658,55 t i 0052 471526254 FREBE R9 RONALD L 1029- 00078 394057 t 0052 502544037 HELET RONALD J 1029 -00079 606.26 0052 47150.1241 KANE MICHAEL R 1029. 00080 400.69 0052 468363473 KLAUSING HENRY F 1029••07081 465040 t 0052 47560.1431....._~.LUTZ ...... __- _.__.... _..DAVID ...P 1029- 00082 ,...._...4 84.`6 0052 471500547 METER GERALD W 1029.000 447.57 t 0052 4 7690 4500 CS WALO _ER IC K 0 1029-00084 0.00 t X I 0052 468166755 PRETT NER w JOSEPH 8 1029.00085 -810.64 t 0052 472241484 REINERT EDWARD A 1029- 00086 628.32 0052 470346224 N A HARRY J 1029.00087 641.20 t 0052 4 T 5 5 8 9 7 T 7 -'... TEVLI 2A PP A JA HE S M 1029-03088 ...0.00 t . x 005 .....9537 OOS 3 4 72 68 3910 AHL•JR •RAT C 102 9.00089 810.51 t 0053 . _..'......472461010 ELIAS _._._,....__ .._._JAMES G 1029 -00090 671.74 005 167246109 GE IS S LER..AL TER --WALTER M 102 9OtI 091 ._ ,...6 Oi • 93 ...t . ,,., 0053 501464671 iESSELE JAMES T 10294000092 CO t X I 0053 475441688 PECK DENNIS L 1029 -00093 563.74 t 0053 472662522 PRIEBE WILLIAM 1029.00094 484.14 r+w.w1r.. • .w•.._r....r..•..r ...... .. r.•• •• +w. .• _.w_w r w ..- _w . 0054 473643775 LOFGREN JOAN R 1029 407.92 t 1 j 0054 ._......407.92 0058 471562563 ;BREHEIM ROGER W 1029 -00096 527.80 0058 4TT602592 M EDSON DAVID 8 1029/*00097 633.97 t 0058 4 73 541590 MULWEE GEORGE M 1029 4000098 487.20 t 1 0058 471501014 NADEAU EDWARD A 1029.00099 54.7.42 0058 468361720 NUTESON LAVERNE S 1029.00100 549.62 t 0058 411365993 OWEN GERALD C 1029.00101 5.80095 t f r•r wrww... .. •.. . .......r •-+ ... .ww..q•w•m .... w.r •.... -.w 0 OS8 w .. +.-. 3.326.96 • M_ ...........,..+..._..._ 0059_ _47624.9760 MACOONALO _JOHN E 1029.00102 502.32 a1 0059 475SO1000 MULVANEY DENNIS M 1029 -00103 690.46 1 9oos e • I CITY OF MAPLEWOCD PAYROLL•CH =CKS REGISTER CYCLE 8021 CHECK DATE 11- 02.84 PERIOD ENDING 10- 26-84 PASE 4 i 09P T• NO EMPL -N0 EMPLOYQE NAME CHECK- NO AMOUNT CLEARED. 0061 477301066 BRENNER LOTS J 102 9- 00104 0.00 t X 0061 468341993 KRUM4EL BARBARA A.102% = 00105 157.06 t 1 0061 473260389 OOEGARD ROBERT 0 1029.00106 911.46 t s 1 • 00¢1 46858261•STAPf.S _ .PAUL INg 1029.0`0107 587092 t M '0061 1 #716944 + 0062 474928762 BRENNER JAY A 1029.00108 0.00 t x 1 ")0062 471447219 BURKE MYLES R 1029.00109 104.85 t 1 R...0 06 2...Y._... _._.474608182 : _.-_GE R MA IN _ ....._ .. ,DAV T O .w„ A 1029-00110 ,__...5 04 .01 0062 472303411 GUSIND4 MELD IN J 1029- 00111 841.52 0062 S02544121 HELET ROLAND a 1029 - 0.01 629.26 t 0062 _468584797 HOPKINS _ .THOMAS _C 1029.00113 0000 x 0062 469744593 HOSCNKA JAMES E 1029 - 00114 0.00 1.0062 413969744 HUNTER TONY 10 29.00115 98037 t n,0062 47 1748313 LI SHAROT THOMAS 0 1029.00116 0.00 t x 0062 473503915 LIN00RFF DENNIS P 1029- •d0117 553010 0062 473565506 MARUSKV MARK A 10291M00118 594.08 t 0062 _ ....444444444 NEAL r. _ _..TODD _ _w 1029 -00119 0000 t x 0062 474018124 AASCHKE ALBERT F 1029.00120 0.00 `_t x 0062 477646662 SANDUIST THOMAS J 1029- w00121 0.00 1 x w. wr 0062 475904189 TOWNLEV MICHAEL.F 1029.00122 0000 t x w . ...ww.•tir.... 7..,•...•w..-w•.q••.. .. .wa•....•.w -•.rr • -w 0062 47?881931 r.. ... ._ ......... .r... TOWNLEY w. _.•r PATRICK J wr, 1029 -00123 w ..._.w O.CO t x w ... -- - • 0062 4i'5T45266 WARD TROY 8 1029.00124 0.00 t x 1 t.._ ._ ._._....._..__.._._.___- _..._. _006? . __.._ ._39816409?XUKER _.^ ...___.WALTER A 102 9- 00125 26.61 4 i •n 0062 39 3S 1.80 OG63 SOIBS4242 AALGAARD ROSS A 1029 -0000 i x 0063 4709401TS ANDERSON CHRISTINE M 1029 -00127 O.CO t x r'''' _.._..._ ..._ .._ ... _ _ ,.......... _ ..... _......_._.....__.w....Q063 475 82 3190 AA RTMt1I,MY _JODY M 1029 - 00128 0.00 t x 0063 4689882 77 BESETH RONALD L 102940129.0,00 x I 0063 2 70 48 379?BLACK WILL IAN 1 1029 4000130 0000 I x 0063 47`2362015 ..80R AS H 00 N NA F 10 2 s• 00 131 O.O tl t x 0063 47396244 BR YANT ROBERT O 1029.00132 0.00 t x 0063 474442474 BUNKE RICHARD H 102900133 0000 t x 006 _47692 CASSEDAT _.ELIZABETH J 1029.00134 0.00 t x 0063 473684976 CASSDAY MARY K 1029 -00135 0000 t x 0063 4 7290 5069 COLLINS STEVEN A 102 9.00136 0000 t x f w _wow. , w ...«. ..w. .........w.. .,._ .- ..•... ... -...w . w.......••.. 006 3 ww +. _ _ _ __.. 469441338 r.. OE MAR SANDRA L 1029 -00137 0000 t x 0063 474929219 CIESEL ww. JERRY 0 1029.00/ 38 wr. .. 0.00 w.w .... t x w..o• -r... +.... . - .._. ..mow .. .... .. •+mow . .... - r• r .._ . _ .. _ 0063 474901922 OINCERMAN JANINE M 1029 - 00139 0•CO t x I 0063 4x6721245 OOUGNTV LINDA R 1029 , 000140 0.00 t x 0063 476900506 DRAKE BARBARA 1 102 9 -00141 0000 t x! 0063 469948645 FALtEIBEK JAMES E 1029- 00142 0000 t x 0063 472921037 F I SCii EF4 SUSAN M 102 9.00143 0000 0063 473925557 FOWLER MARY K 1029.00144 Deco x I S'0.063 417988735 GALBRAITH CHRIS 1029 -00145 0.00 t x 0063 469983628 GRAF MICHAEL,1029 0000 t x 0063 502 82 5654 HA PM DE ADRA M 1029.00147 0000 t x 0063 475826112 HARPER NAMES 102 0000 t x t F. .ww•yr.•M!_nM ..•. +I .,..•/.I_ - +....w «.• .. ... _N •f. .... •ww._ w•+w .I .... i. r ._. ..r..r r.w . . ._tiw•ti•w'4.w...... •11www_. ,awn ..1 ._,•e .. .w ._.w.. ..s .. .. .. . •r .. CITY OF MAPLEWOOC PAYROLL•CHECKS gEGISTER CYCLE 6021 CHECK DATE 11 02 -84 PERIOD END IN6 1026 -84 PAGE 5 DEPT - NO EMPL•NO EMPLOVOE NAME CHECK -NO AMOUNT CLEARED j 0063 474947811 NE I ME R L CAROL 1029-000149 0000 X) 0063 476686996 ME RSER KA RI N J 102 9- 00150 0000 t X 0063 473938785 NOLLINGSWORTH LISA 1029 -08151 0.00 t X 0063 4701181140 JOHNSON JOSEPH A 1029.00152 0.00 t X 0063 4 6980 6100 JOHNSON TERE SA L 1029 -00153 0.0.0 t X 0063 ,_.469862099 .KANE _.-KAREN _... ..._1029- 00154 09GO t X 0063 470680548 KIELSA KAKI J 1029 - 001'55 0000 t X 7]063 416743753 KLASSEN SUSAN 1029 -00156 0.00 X w 0063 47474391 KORTUS JAMES N 1029 -001570.00 t X I 0063 468984615 KRUMMEL BECKY J 102940110158 0000 t X Q63 472484219 LE CL A R ._MARY L 1029.00159 `__.......0.00 t X t,... . __..,._._ ........_...._0063 4l2lLB0498 LOEFFLER CAROL ......J 1.029 -00160 0.00 t K i'0063 470269324 MAC DONALD ELAINE E 1029 -00161 0.00 t X 0063 476923936 MAGILL JOSEPH N 1029 - 00162 0.00 t X 0063 4 73.700 729 MAFRE MICHELE A 1029 - OG163 O. CO t X I 0063 470926903 PESSIN KATHLEEN M 1029 -00164 0.00 t X 0063 474966150 MIMELICM CINDI L 1029 - 00.1.65 0 _ _..._..X.)t. _ _ ._._......... ._ _.. _ ._._........ 0063 469583307 w.. _. ._ N ISKA -JANET A 1029.00166 0.00 X i 0063 474?45123 NOESEN CRISTIN A 1029w00167 0.00 X i 0063 413 565927 '...-.OLSO.4 R OBERTA J 1029 -00168 0.00 X 0063 412808158 PADGETV MARC IE 0 1029 - 00169 111.82 t I 0063 469848105 PEARSON LESLIE A 1029 -00170 06CO t X 0063 472941928.PEL.TIEN MICHAEL R 1029 - 07171 0000 t X 0063 468827763 -RACA w MICHAEL F 1029 - Ogl72 0 t X 0063 396604919 S INN IGER SARAN 1 1029 -00173 0000 1 X 0063 477859067 SPANNBRUER DAWN M 1029 -00174 0.00 t X 0063 .. _ ... ..46.9945370 SPANy881JER EVA ..C 1029.00.175 0.00 t K r 0063 469742645 SPANNSA UER KATHLEEN 6 1029 -00176 0.00 t X 0063 474845176 SPANNHA MARTIN J 102 -00177 0.00 t X I . pw. 0063 469965435 SPANNBAUER SUSAN L 102 9.001 78 ..............0.00 X 0063 477920170 STRAUS LAURA J 1029 -00179 0 t X 0063 476861166 SULLIVAN JULIE 1029 -01180 01600 t X 0063 471823921 SZLREK JOANN N 1029.001.81 0.00 t X f 0063 470626422 TAUBMAN DOUGLAS J 1029 -00182 94.06 t 0063 470963203 WALLACL JON T 1029- 00183 0.00 t X I 0063 396324246 WARD ROT 6 1029••00184 278.31 t j 0063 4 74 60.6610 to HN WILLIAM A 1029m00185 0.00 t X 1 0063 984.19 0064 151440508 GREW N 90.186102 .0 5 22.49 t 1....,._._._...._...._.. ry • .:M I...._.. ...M.... . _ r}'... .._. ...1.._ w ..... .. .. .. .. r s...•w.. 0064 r .. 4713846241384624 n. _,.....r. ...w ......, 1+O RSM ELL JANET w_.w_w +.... JUDITH A 1029w00187 258o5?t 1 f 0064 474542163 SOUTTER CdRISTINE 1029 - -00188 300001 t 1 0064 1 X081.57 • 0071 389448993 C HL.EB ECK JUDY M 1029 - 00189 M 357. 201 0071 475502465 MISKELL NANCY J 1029.00190 0.00 t X I OOT1 470540551 CLSON GEOFFREY Y 1029.00191 802.86 1 1 0071 - . ,1 `16 0.• 06 • 0072 ...._47762717e EKSTRAND THOMAS .6 1029*40192 S 67.80 E CITY iff MAPLE Y000 PAYR OLL•CHCC KS RE 61STER CYCLE 8021 CHECK DATE 11 - - PERIOD ENDING 10 - 26.84 PAGE 6 DEPT•NO ENPLmNO EMPLOYCE NAME CHECK -NO AMOUNT CLEARED 0072 475608505 JO HNSON RANDALL L 10296000193 510o03 t 0072 1 9077083 • 0073 ..476090677 01ROM '_ 'w. ,r MARJOR. tE 1029.00194..8 . 12e29 --'_-'t 0073 812 007 4 468109223 6IRARD LAWRENCE 1029• 00195 86.6 0074 387520776 VENEER ROBERT J 1029 -00196 560.t F 1.. •w.- _w.wr.... _..Mw..r... ww•_.. •'.rw....w.. y. "''A1w r ._ ,..M _+ u. .. .. ..r .•• •..•r .\ .. .. .. .. ..... .rM r_._ /. w r . . . ._ r .. • w • 66 6..90 s war R w w_w+ ... _ .. .r r.r.w.r•.w.... CQU NT 001 9.4 0053 501464671 GESSELE JAMES T 1029- OOOOIA 797,51 0051 471440267 BARTA MARIE L 1029- 00197 286.90 Ja .._..... _ «.•...r.._ .. _ ...._w,....._ .r ....0061 ._..__.._.............: 47730106b... _. w._..ENDIE IRIS ... -.I -1029 - 00198... .,..111,53 r,.,....._..._ GRAND TOTAL 60, 700.69 MINr w.__• •+w.. • ..w. y._... .. _YMMMM•A ^fir-r.wf'rl.l..rf.MMr w_wr...Mrr.Yww ww.ti•.M+ii1•.•......w.... w•VM.wwr 1•w. •_.w.••-. w .... , .w...•.I...w ... v.... .- . « +v.... ... ww.A r.. r._v..ww .....1.._.w_..w.. _ • .. r.. 4 1 .r.. . +• .w r._. r wM..v . .. _. ... w. +r.r r r..... _.w. a.w.I..I• ..r 1iY.. ....+.-.. f•.• M -. y. t. 'w wr•n.NM..•.1/I.wa..fw .S•r.,•. _. ... .r _. +Mr .. i M w.•-Vpp"*pr!..wl.M•,ww..r• rl!'w•..• , '.M/r+7l^.AfM'r•1R'., w M•y .. - »....r wrr.. _.r w w.. _ wwwgr••1.1M7NrinNw rrrr r_w _ .. M..w r,... •. ... r _.. .. w. w .. .. r..... www ..... . ..I.M wrlww.••.rM. r• . wrpl....... •rwwr.WwwrwM.•M.Mr.•A•.•w.w... w.wllw•on•. y w•rw.w•wr .....•w..w+.•w r•. r.__ w -_~q r...nn.w rwa.w _w _ .w..M. _ w•.w. +. ... .... .. I w1+...M++ .. .. ,.. rw +www ._.• .. -w w.w • w..wAt..r I 1 • r.rr ....• .. ._r.w_, .•. «. ... r. __.w_.. M•M« M w.r. qrw. , yM.. w. .r•...•+wr...wr..... • r.rr.AMq . ...ws . Aw _...... ... w w..} .Mw.•r.•.rr r _•••rR • M. _• +•w.w w w+eM.. +•.w......A.•.r w••w YY •./..M.. ++,vM•.I_Y .. +w.w..rrM.. ry ..r w .. ..y... 1 .. - +. ww.. w. ..•r•a..w..ww•..w......w.._•... •rwr «.. _..• w a...++... r. .. .._ «.. ... w. w._. ..w.. .w...nw...w.«. .•..r.... r.r .. ... ....r_ ._. .. ... .. ..r .. ., «. .+. w••.. _._.,. •.rr . .. _. .. ter. » .• ..... ..... •........., w. .... .._..r. i,1 1 •w. +..w..• .+wr _. y...... -.. .... ...... .,....n .., .. ^w•w.ww.ww.f.ww.. ...rr .. . w... _- .r.•._.... ,wwww.. _+wn• .w. w....ww...«w •• .•.w... w...... .. r....w.. w .... r.w .y r.w... .. ..wglyr .yUh,.. •,.. • • •.l.. . sww ••.... _ _. • w. {n .. .. 4- 01 MEMORANDUM To City Manager FROM: Publ Works Co. SUBJECT: Budget Transfer -- Hydrant Fund DATE: November 2, 1984 Action by Council: End ors. e d__ Mo if ed, Re e Da The repairs on the three water booster stations in 1984.have far exceeded the amount anticipated in the budget. In order to provide full service and fire protection within the shortest possible time after a failure, the necessary repairs were made on an "emer- gency need" basis. The following transfers are recommended in -order to accommodate these costs and to provide funds for the remainder of 1984: From To Amount 03- 4910 -60 Contingency 03- 4470 -60 Repair & Maintenance $1830 Unappropriated Fund Balance $4430 These transfers will result in a balance of. $2,000 in the repair and maintenance account for the remainder of the year. elk st— MEMORANDUM Action by Council.- o d TOO Cit Manager EnClo rs i e dFROM:. Public Works Coordinator M, o -IL SUBJECT: Budget Transfer--V.E.M. Fund DATE: November 2. 1984 D a Le In Ja of this year the circle gear which rotates the blade on the motor grader cracked. Repairs totaled $7,712,90. In October of this year, the Cat diesel en on one of the lar trucks swallowed a valve, expandin a piston which in turn cracked the block.- Estimate of the repair is $1.,800.00. These two items constitute over 78% of the amount bud for repair and maintenance of vehicles., It 1.s recommended that $9,020.00 be transferred, from the Contin Account 96.4910-59) to the Repair and Maintenance/Vehicles Account(96-4420-59) to provide sufficient funds for the remainder of 1984. MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM Publ'i c Works Coordinator SUBJECT: Budget Transfer -- Street Maintenance DATE November 2, 1984 Action b,;i Cou -mc i Endorse Mo di f Re j ected. Date A transfer of $2,110.00 from the Signs and Signals Account (01- 4220 -52) to the Fees For Service Account (01- 4480 -52) is recommended in order to meet the higher costs incurred for street striping in 1984. These higher costs were due to higher paint prices and additional new streets to stripe. f; Action by CouIn MEMORANDUM rt _ ° f1ed ._ Rejected To: City Manager Date FROM: Assistant City Engineer j SUBJECT: Hill wood Drive /Dori and Road improvements f.Project No. 78 -10 DATE: October 30, 1984 A final estimate for payme has been submitted by Mueller Pi pel i ners , Inc. the contractor for the above -named project. Schoel 1 and Madsen, Inc.. the city's consultant, has checked the estimate and finds it to represent a completed contract. The original contract amount plus three approved change orders total .$717, 928.30. The contractor has completed the project for $686,692.22 or . $31, 236.08 less than the contract. amount and is request - ing final payment of $999.97. It is recommended that the city council adopt the attached resolution which certifies the project as compl and authori final payment to the contractor. mb s RESOLUTION DIRECTING FINAL PAYMENT ON CONTRACT WHEREAS, the city council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project No. 78 1M10, Hill wood Drive /Dort and Road Improvements, and has let a construction contract, therefore, pur- suant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, said project has been certified as NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the project is completed and final payment on the con - struction contract is hereby authorized. A A i MEMORANDUM e ' eCt a Da e . TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Joint Holloway :Avenue Improvements Project No. 81 -12 DATE: November 1, 1984 A final estimate for payment has been submitted by T.A. Schifsky and Sons, Inc., the contractor for the above - named project. Short - Elliott- Hendrickson, Inc., the city's consultant, has checked the estimate and finds it to be complete. The original contract amount plus three approved change orders total $884,,022.42. The contractor has completed the project for $873,840.92 or 10,181.50 less than the contract amount and is requesting final payment of $23,197.18. Final calculations of billings to Ramsey County and North St. Paul w i l l be made to close this joint project if this final payment is authorized. It is recommended that the city council. adopt the attached resolution which certifies the project as complete and authorizes final payment to the contractor. 6 jw - enclosure 6D RESOLUTION DIRECTING FINAL PAYMENT ON CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project No. 81-12, Joint Hollowa y Avenue Improvements, and has let a construction contract, therefore, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, said project has been certified as completed. NOW THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA that the project is completed and final a ment on the construction contract is hereby authorizepayment d. El., fto- 7 MEMORANDUM c: ' ion by -t kod f Rejecte a.,, TO City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: Cancellation of Special Assessments DATE: November 2, 1984 PROPOSAL It is proposed that saeci al assessments, interest and renal ti es due from Ramsey County total i nq $5n.636.57 be cancelled . BACKGROUND In Auqust, 1982, Ramsey County appealed the.City "s special assessments for the East Shore Drive Improvements. The attached letter dated October 3, 1984 from John Bannigan recommends that these speci assessments be cancelled. As of December 31, 1983, these assessments, alonq with interest and penalties, totaled $50,636.57. Cancellation of the assessments will decrease the assets available for repayment of the bonds that financed.this protect. However, there i a projected surpl for the bond issue of $89 , ' 000" Therefore, cancellation of these assessments will n.ot require an additional tax levy RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that special assessments interest and penalties due from Ramsey County total i nQ $50,636.57 be cancelled. OFF:1nb LAIS, BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING STH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101 AREA CODE 612 DONALD L. LAIS JOHN F. BANNIGAN..IR. 224 -3781 PATRICK .J. KELLY October 31, l9 8 4 Mr. Daniel Faust City .of Maplewood Finance Director 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: East Shore Drive Improvements Projects 78 -9, Ramsey County vs City of Maplewood Court File 458662 Dear Mr. Faust: This is in response to your recent telehone inquiry as to the status of the above appeal. Ramsey County took an appeal from the levy of $32,385.60 in special assessments against Parcel 22 (Fliecek Park) for 1,560 front feet of water main at $20,76 per front foot. In the same action, it appealed from the levy of 13,497.99 for 643 front feet of water main and 27 feet of curb and gutter against Parcel 23, right of way connecting Frost Avenue with East Shore Drive. The County's position regarding the assessab' 'ty of Fliecek Park is similar to that taken in its appeal in the County Ditch 17 storm sewer improvement and the water tower improvement. Fliecek Park was part of the Keller Golf Course acquisition. In the County Ditch 17 and water tower appeals, the Trial . Court, the Honorable James M. Lynch, as a matter of law, concluded: l Mr. Daniel Faust Page 2 October 31, 1984 1) By reason of Laws 1977, Chapter 425, Ramsey County's Park, Recreational and Open Space land is not immune from assessment by the City of Maplewood for actual benefit received. 2) The limitation as to land use contained in Laws 1977, Chapters 425, should be considered by the . trier of fact to determine the extent of benefit, if any, the parcels assessed have received." The above is from an intermediate order. The Court ultimately concluded in its final order as follows: 9. Where properties in their highest and best use are not shown to have been benefited in appreciation of their fair market value by local improvement, it is the Court's duty to declare the assessments null and void and to order them removed from the rolls." The so- called open space laws, the enabling act utilized by the County in the acquisition of Fhecek Park, prohibits the County from selling, Leasing or disposing of this open space property except for park, open space or recreational purposes. The open space law, therefore, establishes the highest and best use to which the property can be put. Once this determination is made, the property cannot be. assessed as though it were in private hands with a potential highest and best use in the reasonably foreseeable future. Based on this conclusion and on the prior holding of the Ramsey County District Court, it would be our recommendation to the City to cancel the assessements levied for water main under Minnesota Statutes §-429.071. Additionally, the County takes the position that it has a contractual undertaking by the City which prohibits such an assessment. t- 4. The City shall pay one hundred percent (100 %) of the cost of the City of Maplewood Project 78 -9.. All work constructed on this project shall be the property of the City and all maintenance and operation of the works constructed on this project shall be the responsibility of the City." A fair construction of that contract provision may constitute a waiver of the right to assess. 1'. .r Mr. Daniel Faust Page 3 October 31,1984 As to Parcel 23, the County takes the position that it acquired that property as right of way for the Frost Avenue connector, a public highway purpose, from Harold P. and Genevieve M. Frietag. The County claims exemption from special assessments therefor pursuant to the provisions of Minn. Stat. 435.19 Subd. 1 which states in pertinent part as follows: Subd. 1 Any city ... having authority to levy special assessments may levy special asesssments against the property of a governmental unit benefited by an improve- ment to the same extent. as if such property were privately owned, but no such assessments, except. for storm sewers or drain systems, shall be levied against ' a governmental unit for properties used or to be used for highway rights of way. " Emphasis added) In examining the HIGHWAY EASEMENT from Harold P. Frietag and Genevieve M. Frietag, husband and wife, to the County of Ramsey, dated March 29, 1978 and recorded April 6, 1978 as Document No. 1999025. we are satisfied that the statement "for highway purposes" brings it within the statutory exception. That land was not .park land or open space land as previously believed. As in the case of Parcel 22, it is my recommendation that the City cancel its water main assessment against the County's property. I will be available to develop these recommendations further at your convenience. KELLY, P.A. 1. 4;p% JB:cg C: Barry Evans Ken Haider Sincerely yours, Eft' November 2, 1984 Act MEMORANDUM E.e .. , Mad if_ ed-, . Rey; U u 'r 'a.c..ss+a... To: City Manager Barry Evans D From: Chief of Poli Kenneth V Collins c...4 2 Subject: Request to Transfer Funds From Poli Services Budget to Civil Service Budget Due to police officer retirements and resignations in 1984, it was necessary to hire new officers. This required further Civil Service testing which had not been budgeted for. In an effort to pay for these.expenses, I am requesting that $1,000 be transferred from Police Services Account 01- 4420 -42 to Civil Service Account 01- 4480 -05. I am requesting that with your approval that this matter be brought to the City Council for approval. KVC:js cc Budget File Civil Service F i l e Action by Endorse(MEMORANDUM Modified Rejecte Date TO: Barry Evans, City Manager FROM: Larry Cude, Director of Emergency Services DATE: October 31, 1984 I was informed by Collins Electric that the siren at 2621 Linwood has a burned out motor. To repair the motor, the cost will be approximately 900 In.checking with Weber Troseth, the supplier for Federal sirens, the replacement cost of the motor is $1,100 plus $300 installation charge. I recommend that a new motor be purchased. I request that $1,400 be transferred and placed.in Account 4430 from the monies that were allocated for the revamping of the telephone system for city hall. Y. 4' k i. i TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: PROJECT: DATE: MEMORANDUM City Manager Associate Planner -- Johnson Time Extension Linwood Avenue, East of McKnight Road Kurt Schwichtenberg Schwichtenberg's 2nd Addition October B, 1984 SUMMARY E., /Z) Action by Cou,:c Reecte3.._, Date, Request A one -year time extension_ for a thirteen lot, single - dwelling subdivision. Comments The applicant has been unable to secure financing for this development. His plans are to move forward as soon as the market conditions will permit. (Refer to the applicant's attached letter.) Recommendation Approval of a one -year time extension for the Schwi chtenberg 2nd Addition preliminary plat. BACKGROUND Past Actions 11 -8 -82: Council approved the Schwichtenberg 2nd Addition reliminar plat, subject to: P yp , 1. Lot five, block one and lot one, block two shall be at least 100 feet in width, at the established building setback l i n e from Dorland Road. 2. That part of the outl of lying northeast of a line from the northeast corner of parcel 040 -29 to the center of the temporary Dorland Road cul-de-sac, shall be combined with lot three, block 52 . as illustrated on map three. The remainder of the outlot shall be redesignated as Outlot A. 30 Lots seven and nine, bl ock - one, shall be at least 75 feet wide at the building setback line, as measured parallel to the right -of -way of Dorland Road. 4. Lots five through eleven, block one, shall be changed to lots one through seven, block three. 5. A signed. developers' agreement shall be approved by the City Engineer. The developers' agreement shall include provisions for: a. Dedication of storm sewer and trail easements as follows: 1) Twenty -feet wide from Dahl Road to the existing pond, centered on the east l i n e of lots five through eight, block one. 2) Twenty -feet wide adjacent to the southwesterly and southerly lines of lot eleven, block one. 3) - Ten -feet wide across the northwest corner of lot eleven, block one as measured from the west l i n e of the plat. This condition will be eliminated if the property owners to the west grant an easement. 4) over the existing pond. b. Construction of public streets and utilities internal to the plat, including easements, construction and elimination of the temporary cul -de -sacs at the ends of Dorland and Dahl Roads. 6. Approval by the City Engineer of final grading, drainage, and utility plans. 7. Submission of an erosion control plan to the City Engineer, consistent with the recommendations of the Soil Conservation Service. This plan shall address the trail access to the park (Outlot C) . 8. Outi of C may be used for calculating density on lot four, block one. 2 _ t t . 9. Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit, the developer shall grade an eight foot wide trail within the storm water easement adjoining lot eleven, block one from Outl of C to the temporary cul-de-sac for Dorl and Road. The alignment within the storm water easement shall be approved by the City Engineer. (A recommended trail alignment is illustrated on map two.) 100 Except for the land lying east of. the trail (,item nine) the area south- west of the southwest line of lot eleven, block one and north of the easterly extension of the south line of parcel 040 -29 (map three) shall be designated as Outlot S. The excepted land shall be combined with lot eleven, block one. 110 outl of C shall be dedicated to the city for park not in l i e u of PAC charge. 11- 14 -83: Council approved a one -year time extension for this proposal. Planning Section 30 -5(e) states "For one year following preliminary approval and for two (2) years following final approval, unless the subdivider and the city agree otherwise, no amendment to a comprehensive plan or official control shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout, or dedication or platting required or permitted by the approved application. Thereafter, pursuant to its regulations the city may extend the period by agreement with the subdi vi er and subject to all app i.ca a per ormance conditions and requirements or it may require submission of a new apP ication, unless substantial physical activity and investment has occurred in reasona e reliance on the approved application and the subdivider will suffer substantial financial damage as a consequence of a requirement to submit a new application. In connection with a subdivision involving planned and staged development, the city may by resolution or agreement grant the rights referred to herein for such periods of time longer than two (2) years which it determines to be reasonable and appropriate. Jw Attachments 1. Location map 2. Preliminary plat map 3. Applicant's letter of justification 9 -28 -84 LOWER AFTON RD. - 39 LORIN L A. No .•• AV t 2 • ~• Sri ; '39 f2)J — Q - CL t LAKEWOOD DR Cr Cn (2) TEAKWOOD DR. 13) COtESTV DR. 14) OAKRIDCE OR - Z Z o OS) MILLWOOD DR. 0 2 25 ) L r Ivor O AVE. 23 A 72 t AOT2111111 R2tw 13116 R2Iw d _ Q = YLi Q 72 . 494 IcyHwou A E 7'a 74 25 411E AVE. ' h E MM TZ LAVE SOUTHC S pR 72 s i n Corner BOXWOOD EVE._ Lake 494 z b8 o CARVER 72 V 43 4 LOCATION MAP o. 4-Attachment 1 4 N 060 ge 40 ob 40 do as Ifs! - ' -• `• ` low o t• SSCHWICHTENBERG.• ' •''''= ADDITION • • • a. 1 - .• 1 ! f •••.•..... i fo a. ao W. Oft a - 771 •. •• •• •'• -- ••• •`• - Ar do ••r+ 9 ' ''• • s •` J i j ud •,, • '• :: = - :. • ..•i •• •• , - •+ T •• • •.mw Rs • • w • ' • •-•. •- • • • wr , fir - • i• • • • • '••.• •• ` .. ' T • • ` •- ••_• 1 • j r-• 40N • •. • • • .7 • 1 • ca i • • t • • 1 .,. • • d. • . ..• ' • . • I ••• • • • •i - '•• -• • shi. • •••• _ • - r ••-•• • • I • r- •••.- -• _- •- •may.•••••••- ••••r•••••••• r r . • • • Wo • - • ••• •• ••••..•••1 ---•. •.... • - -• r- -• • • t oft V t ! • ` 7+. { •- . ,• ... ••t .. :` -.....-'•_ - it •••••.0o ".Out r•r- fir • • •'.:•.• - •- •.••• 4 •• -• - ••• •- ••r-•r.•• •N. -.• . s do •• —.... •• -- ••-- •... -••• rr 1 ' . • //• --.• •./ •i •• j • : • •• rr. . -: -: ••••••• ~ ti - ""ft-•ter •- xk Trail Alignment Outl of B . Jo 1 1 f •• f = qr dp i i •' - I ova dp • 1. • f,. • is • t • t •• • T No .. . .100 +f ;' . r orSl : • '::•I. •; ski • r j • I l :• t f I j j : 51it xj's ii e s w •........ , MAP 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT SCHWICHTENBERG SECOND ADDITION JL. LAND TO . BE DEDICATED FOR PARK 5 - Attachment 2 September 28, 1984 Randy Johnson Department of Community Development City of Maplewood Maplewood, Minnesota Dear Mr. Johnson, We wish to extend preliminary approval of the thirt lot platt east of the present terminus of DahlRoad for one year. It remains our intention to improve this plate and sell - lots`. I do not forsee any changes in this proposal and would like to retain the benefit of work done on it to this point so that it can be executed promptly when the market and financing conditions allow. Thank you for your consideration. Yours truly, Kurt Schwichtenberg i 6 Attachment 3 rya September 28, 1984 Randy Johnson Department of Community Development City of Maplewood Maplewood, Minnesota Dear Mr. Johnson, We wish to extend preliminary approval of the thirt lot platt east of the present terminus of DahlRoad for one year. It remains our intention to improve this plate and sell - lots`. I do not forsee any changes in this proposal and would like to retain the benefit of work done on it to this point so that it can be executed promptly when the market and financing conditions allow. Thank you for your consideration. Yours truly, Kurt Schwichtenberg i 6 Attachment 3 MEMORANDUM TO: CITY MANAGER FROM: CITY CLERK REGARDING: RENEWAL OF OFF-SALE LI LICENSES FOR 1985 DATE: NOVEMBER 5, 1984 En M CIL Resolution No. RESOLVED s b the Cit Council of the Cit of Maplewood, Ramse County, Minnesota, that the followin Off Sale Li Licenses havin been. previousl dul issued b this Council, are hereb approved for renewal for one year, effective Januar 1,, 1984, with approvals granted herein subject to satisfactor results of re Police, C & G. Li 1347 Frost .Avenue J &RLi 2730 Stillwater Road Labe*r Li 1730 Rice Street Maplewood Wine Cellar 1911 Ernst Avpnup Part T Lime Li 1740 VanD Avenue Red Wa Li 2290 Maplewood Drive Sarrack"s International Wines & Spirits 2305 Stillwater Road Spark Li 3000 White Bear Avenue F / OZ.. MEMORANDUM , • , soy, TO: CITY MANAGER FROM • CITY CLERK = REGARDING: RENEWAL OF ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES FOR 1985.._... -- DATE: NOVEMBER 5, 1984 Resolution No. RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, that the following On Sale Liquor Licenses having been previous duly issued by this Council. are hereby approved for renewal for one year, effective January 1, 1984, with approval granted herein subject to satisfactory results of required Police, Fire and Health inspections. . Bail Hai Restaurant Keller lake Clubhouse 2305 White Sear Avenue 2166 Maplewood Drive Ch Bar & Cafe, Inc.Bernard's 2289 E. Minnehaha 3035 White Bear Avenue Dean's, Inc.Le6istro Cafe 1986 Rice Street 1146 -48 Maplewood Mall Esteban's of Maplewood, Inc.Maple Wheel .eel Lounge3069WhiteBearAvenue2220WhiteBearAvenue Fox--.& Hounds Maplewoodpewood Bowl 1734 Adolphus 1955 English Garrity : s Northerna i re Motel, Inc. 1696 Whi Bear Avenue 2441 Highway 61 Gulden's, Inc.Red Lobster 2999 N. Highway 61 2925 Whi Bear Avenue Holiday Inn of Maplewood Red Rooster 1780 E. County Road D 2029 Wood 1 yn Hook ' n Ladder Town Cr 2280 Maplewood Drive 1829 North St. Paul Road Hideaway Chuck E. Cheese's Pizza Time Theatre 70 E. County Road B 2950 White Bear Avenue Beer and Wine License)Maplewood Moose Lodge #963 1946 English Street Club License) t'!3 MEMORANDUM TO: CITY MANAGER FROM: CITY CLERK REGARDING: REHEARING OF MOGREN LANDSCAPING IDR DATE: NOVEMBER 5, 1984 Act.ion by E Modif Rejected- Date It i s necessary to reschedule the p u b l i c hearing for the Mogren Landscaping Industrial. Revenue Note (Edina Realty B u i l d i n g ) . The p r i n c i p a l s involved changed the a name of the company. A hearing date of November 26, 1984 at 7:20 P.M. is suggested. MATmzw J I.Evzrr DOLE 031m R ROBERT M.BOWZN FRANK HAMMOND LEONARD J. FUMS RoHERT G. SHARE JOHN M. SMMVAN BzRNARD P. FRIEL BURT E. SWANSON M. J. GALVIN, JR- DAVID G. FORsnz JOHN J. MCNsELT. McNim V SETMOUR, JR. JEaHY F. RorMAx TERENCE N. Domx RicnAaD H. HTLz Jonx L. DEvxaY R L. SosENSON PV=R H. SHED SAMUEL L. RANSOM RONALD E.ORCHARD Jonx TaorER STEPHZx WDMICz AvRoN L. GORDON JoHN R. KEMWICz JOHN R. FRIEDMAN TaoxAs A. LARSON DAVID J. SPENCER DANIEL J. COLE, JR. PE=ER W. SIPKINS DouoLAs L. Szoa MICHAEL H. JEROMMUS R. Soon DAvIES J. PaTRIca MCDAVITr Joan B. VAN DE NORTH, JR. BICSARD G. MARK ANDRzw G. BECHER JAMES E. NELSON Jzaoxz A. GEZs STEvz A. BRAND JOEL H. G=ZSMAN ALAN H. MACLIN JEIpasY F. SHAW LLTrsaw L. LEvIrT DAVID G. GREENING DAVID B. SAND LAW OFFI C E S BRIGGS AND MORGAN PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANG 23UIIMING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE (612) 201 -1215 TELECOPIER (612) 222-4071 INCLUDI240 THE FORMER FIRM OF LEVITT, PALMER, BOWEN, ROTMAN & SHADE November 2, 1984 Mrs Lucille Aurelius City Clerk 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 JOSEPH P. NOACz GHARLas R. HAZNOa ANDREA M. BoxD MArTIN H. Fisx JOHN B VLT?NA JAMES G. RAT MCNARD H. MARTIN TRUDY J. SALi.A MAZY L. IPPEL RoBzjrr E. Woom ROBYN L. HAxszN WILLIAM J. JOAMS MAxoAzzT K. SAVAGE BRIAN G. BELISLE TONT STEWEROEB MAW SCaAMER EVINGER MICHAEL H. STRKATZR JOHN H. LnaDSTWX RwaAjm D. AWDEasox SALLY A. SOOGGIN DAVID G. McDamAw BRUCE W. Moorr ViRmnu A. Dwzazz Re: City of .Maplewood - $ Commercial Development Revenue Note of 1984 (2 9 6 0 Associates Project) De a r Lu : Duo NILSSON ANDzm R. KnrmxoaR FREDERICK P. Axon RoBzRT L. LEE TRUDY R. GAsTrAmno Ew:zAz =u J. AxDRZws GREGO= J. STENMOE GaAaLEs B. Roozas PAUL M. GALES TERRY L: Sm MART M. DnmZTH Kz+vnl A. BEac OF COUNSEL J. NELL MoaroN RIO$Aan E. KYLE JOHN M. PALMIER SAMUEL H. MORGAN FRANK N. 6R&RAM A. LAU$ExCE DAMS GLARENCz G. FRAME Enclosed in connection with the above referenced matter is one copy each of the following documents: 1. Resolution Calling for a Public Hearing 2. Preliminary Resolution 3. Form of City's Letter to MEEDA 4. Form of Preliminary opinion of Briggs and Morgan 5. Form of Bank' s Letter 6. Form of Application to MEEDA I am also enclosing five additional copies of the Resolution Calling for a Hearing for adoption by the City Council at its meeting on November 8, 19840 82.00 FIRST NATIONAL. SANX BUILDING 2400 IDS CENTER AIM? PArTI,,'[INNESOTA 46101 MINNEAPOLSs, MINNESOTA 554-02 618) R6l -mb (012)330- 096i BRIGGS AWX3 MORGAN Mrs. Lucille Aurelius No 2, 1934 Page Two Please do not hesitate to call, if you have any questions or comments regarding this matter. very truly yours, Caroline H. Bates Legal Assistant CHB : j at Enclosures IL RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF A NOTICE OF THE HEARING WHEREAS, a) Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, known as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (the "Act ") gives muni- cipalities the power to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of the encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to prevent so far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; b) The City Council of the City of Maplewood (the "City "') has received from 2960 Associates, a general partnership to be organized under the Laws of the State of Minnesota with Gerald C. Mogren, Robert C. Mogren and Lee C1 intsman as general partners and others to be named (the "Company ") a proposal that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter described, through the issuance of its industrial revenue bonds which may be in the form of a single debt instrument) (the "Bonds ") pursuant to the Act; c) Before proceeding with consider - ation of the request of the Company it is necessary for the City to hold a public hearing on the proposal pursuant to section 474.01, Subdivision 7b, Minnesota Statutes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. A public hearing on the proposal of the Company will be held at the time and place set forth in the Notice of Hearing hereto attached. 2. The cieneral nature of the proposal and an estimate of the principal amount of bonds to be issued to finance the proposal are described in. the attached form of Notice of Hearing. 3. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Energy and Economic Development Authority, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project together with proposed forms of all attachments and exhibits thereto, is on file in the office of the City Clerk. 4. The actions of the City Clerk is causing notice of the public hearing and in describing the general nature of the Project and estimating the principal amount of the Revenue Bonds to be issued to finance the Project and in preparing a draft of the proposed application to the Authority, for approval of the Project are in all respects ratified and confirmed. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this 8th day of November, 1984. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota will meet at the City Hall in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota at 7:20 p.m. on November 26, 1984, to consider the proposal of 2960 Associates, a Minnesota general partnership to be formed with Gerald C. Mogren, Robert C . Mogren and Lee Clintsman as general partners and others to be named (the "Company ") , that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter described by the issuance of industrial development revenue bonds. Description of Project The proposed project shall consist of the acquisition of land and the construction and equipping thereon of an approximately 15,000 square foot office building to be located on the East side of White Bear Avenue between Lydia Avenue and Beam Avenue directly North of the Maplewood East Shopping Center in Maplewood. The maximum aggregate estimated principal amount of bonds or other obligations to be issued to finance this project is $1,200,000. The project will be initially owned and operated by the Company and leased to Edina Realty. The bonds or other obligations if and when issued will not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance upon any property of the City except the project and such bonds or obligations will not be a charge against the City's general credit or taxing powers but will be payable from sums to be paid by the Company pursuant to a revenue agreement. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Energy and Economic Development Authority, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, is available for public inspection from 9:00 a.m.. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, at the City Hall in Maplewood, Minnesota. At the time and place fixed for the Public Hearing, the City. Council of the City of Maplewood will give all persons who appear at the hearing an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL) By /s/ Lucille Aurelius City clerk El 4 : MEMORANDUM TO : Ci Manager FROM: Finance Director ' RE: Health Care Maintenance Account Plan DATE: November 2, 1984 C0711 -Act; on b Rr a.orS e d __ ,.,.,._,..__ Re j e Date _....,.. PROPOSAL It is Dr000sed that the attached Health Care Maintenance Account Plan document be aonroved for fi l i n with the La Department. BACKGROUND On December 12, 1983, the City Council approved the use of an IRS 125 plan to nermi t employees to pay premiums for hospitalization and similar benefits with pre -tax doll This benefit was part of the negotiated waqes and benefits for each bargaini unit, Additional background information is attached. In order to complete the implementation of our Health Care Maintenance Account under the IRS 125 regulations, it is necessary that the Council formal approve the attached Health Care Maintenance Account Plan document so that it can be filed with the Labor Department; Originally this was going to be done earlier this year, but was delayed because l eqi s1 ati on was pendinq before Congress which would have affected how the plan document was drafted. An attorney that specialized in employee benefit plans of this type has reviewed the attached D1an and indicated it is in compliance with IRS regulations (see attached letter), RECOMMENDATION I t is recommended that the attached Health Care Maintenance Account Plan document be approved for fili with the Labor Department. DFF:1nb w CITY OF r MAPLEWOOD 1380 FROST AVI;Nt'E M11YI,EW00I). MINIESOTA 55109 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 612- 790-4510 September 25, 1984 Ms. Dayle Nolan LeFevere, Lefler, Kennedy, O'Brien and Drawz Suite 2000 1st Bank Place West Minneapolis, MN 55402 Dear Ms. Nolan: RE: Health Care Maintenance Account Plan This letter is in regard to telephone conversations between you, Ted Millard and I regarding changes in payroll deductions for the above IRS 125 plan. It is requested that you provide a legal opinion on whether we can change the payroll deductions for our plan due to changes in insurance premium rates, Our H. C.M.A. plan was implemented on January 1st for our police officers and non -union employees. Enclosed is a copy of the memo and plan summary that out employees received. Later in the year, our remaining employees were added to the H.C.M.A. plan as contracts for their respective bargaining units were approved. In June, Douq Smith of the DCA Corporation prepared the enclosed draft of the H. C. M. A. plan document which is designed to he in com- pliance with the current I.R.S. regulations. This plan document has not been filed with the Labor Department nor has it been officially approved by our City Council. However, our City Council did approve the addition of an IRS 125 when each bargaining unit contract was approved. On October 1st, the remium rates for our health and dental insurance plans are revised by our insurance carriers. This necessitates a chanae in the employee payroll deductions. Since the changes in the payroll deductions are relatively minor, we. would prefer to change the H.C.M,A. payroll deduction, but this would be contrary to the provisions of our plan document and also to the I.R.S. regu- lations. The alternative is to create a whole new set of payroll deductions for the portion of health and dental insurance premiums that exceeds the previous premium rates, This latter option would be costly to implement. Therefore we have dediced to simply change the H,C.M.A. payroll deduction. s . Ms. Dayle Nolan September 25, 1984 Page -2- It is requested that you review this matter and provide a legal opinion on 1) whether ayear -end adjustment in the H.C.M.A. payroll deduction should be made to reverse the increase that we made now and (2) whether you believe our plan as presently drafted is in compliance with I.R.S. regulations. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Daniel F. Faust Finance Director DFF:Inb enclosure f sN MEMORANDUM 0 TO: Local 320 and Non - U n Emplo ees FROM: Finance Director RE: Pre -Tax Premium Payment Plan DATE January 9, 1984 On December 16th the City Council authorized the use of an IRS -125 plan for employee insurance premiums.. Under this plan, premiums are paid with pre -tax dollars for group medical, dental and some l i f e i nsurance coverages The attachment explains in detail how the I RS . 125 plan operates, Implementation of this plan required modifications to the City ` s computerized payroll program. I have Just been advised that these modifications have been completed which will allow implementation on the January 13th payroll checks. As a result, payroll deductions previously listed separately for medical , dental and life insurance will be combined and labeled as H.C.M.A. (Health Care Maintenance Account). This indicates. that the payroll deduction is being paid with pre -tax dollars. In some cases,. - a life insurance payroll deduction will be continued for coverages not eligible to be included with the H . C . M. A. deduction. These revisions in your payroll deductions technically can not be made until you have completed the attached Payroll Conversion Authorization Form. .Due to the tax advantages of the IRS -125 plan and the short notice involved, your January 1.3th payroll check is being prepared based on the assumption that you will authorize the payment of your insurance premiums with pre -tax dollars. (There w i l l not be any increase in the amount deducted for insurance premiums.) However, before your January 13th check can be released, you must complete the attached authorization form. If for some reason you decide not to participate ion thi s plan so indicate on the attached form and your payroll check will be recalculated. It should be noted that your election on this type of deduction can be changed only on January 1 and July 1 of each year. Please feel free to contact me if you have have any questions. T.. e attached Pay ro11Y Conversion Authorization Form should be turned in to my Secretar Lois Behm, by noon on Thursday Janus 12th. DFF:1nb 1 ' CITY OF MAPLEWOOD r Medical, Dental and Life Insurance Pre -Tax Premium Payment Plan Who Is Eli Employees in positions covered by Union Local No. 320 and non -union employees of the City who pay premiums for the City's group medical, dental and life insurance plans. How Does It Work? mayeesEliibleemployees pa premiums for the City's group coverages with payrollPyyy dollars that are not taxed for federal and state income tax purposes nor for Social Security (FICA) purposes. To date, these dremiums have been paid with after -tax dollars. When Can I Start Paying Pre -Tax Premiums? On or.after January 1, 19840 How Do I Sign U0 simply fill out the attached form and return it to the Finance Department. May I Pay Some Premiums On A Pre -Tax Basis And Not Others? No. + 9Ymustdesignate that all or none of your premiums will be paid on a pre -tax basis. What's The Advantage To.Me Of Pre -Tax Premium Pa ents? You avoid all t axes on amounts you use to pay premiums for City- sponsored group I f , for exampl you pay $600 per year in premiums, and you re in a 40/ programs. o tax bracket when you combine your federal, state a nd FICA (6.7%) y outaxes, ,y could have roughly $240 more in take -home pay each year by paying your premiums with pre -tax dollars. I qfIDon't Si n U Now, May I Do So At Some Future Date? You may 9porg ysucha our election on any January l or July 1. Are There Any Limits On The Premiums That Can Be Paid With Pre -Tax Dollars? premiums qualify, Premiums for City-sponsoredfAllofyourmedicalanddentalplanpeqy group life insurance coverage may be paid with pre -tax dollars only for coverage up to $ 50,000. Premiums for City- sponsored group dependent life insurance coverage. paid P.be aid with re -tax dollars only for coverage up to $2500 per dependent. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD HEALTH CARE MAINTENANCE ACCOUNT PLAN Effective as of January It 1984) Section 1. The Plan 1.1 Establishment. City of Maplewood (hereinafter the "City") hereby establishes, effective as of January 1, 1984, a plan of f lexible compensation for the benef it of eligible Employees of the City, which shall be known as the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD HEALTH CARE MAINTENANCE ACCOUNT PLAN (the "Plan "). 1.2 Purpose The purpose._ of the Plan is to increase the social insurance protection of eligible Employees by providing such Employees the choice, within amounts of money to be provided as specif ied here- in, among different combinations of health care maintenance coverage and direct compensation, The Plan is intended to comply with the provisions of Sections 105 and 125 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended. Se 2e Definitions 2.1 Definitions. Whenever used in the Plan, the following words and P hrases shall have the meanings set forth below unless the context 1 plainly requires a dif ferent meaning, and when the def ined meaning is intended, the term is capitalized: a) "Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended. b) " Compensation " of a Participant means the total salary, wages, bonuses, pay for overtime, vacation pay, sick pay, pay for shift differentials, and other cash compensa- tion paid by the City. to a Participant (without regard to any salary conversion under this Plan) , but excluding reim- bursed expenses, credits or benefits under any plan of deferred compensation to which the City contributes, and any additional compensation payable in a form other than cash. c) " Dependent " means an individual who qualifies as a dependent under the terms of Section 152 of the Code. d) " Effective Date means the date on which the Plan became effective, i.e., January 1, 1984. e) " Employee " means any full -time, permanent employee of the City. f) " Participant " means a person (i) who is an Employee on or after the Effective Date, (ii)(1) who became an Employee on or before January 1, 1984, or became an Employee after January 11 1984, and (iii) who satisfies the 2 participation conditions of Section 3. A person who has become a Participant shall. remain a Participant until all benefits due him under the provisions of the Plan have been paid to him or otherwise have been satisfied. g) "Plan" means the "CITY OF MAPLEWOOD HEALTH CARE MAINTENANCE ACCOUNT PLAN" as set forth herein and as may be amended or restated from time to time.- h) " Plan Year means the twelve -month period ending December 310 2.2 Gender and Number. Except as otherwise indicated by context, masculine terminology used herein also includes the feminine and neuter, and terms used in the singular may also include the plural. Section 3. Partici ation Conditions 3.1 Participation Conditions. As a condition to participation and receipt of benefits under this Plan, the Participant agrees to: a. Furnish to the City the Application to Participate provided for in paragraph 3.2 below; b. Observe all rules and regulations implementing this Plan; c. Consent to inquiries by the City with respect to any claim under this Plan; 3 d. Submit to the City all reports, bills., and other information which the City may reasonably require; and e. Designate a portion of his Compensation as Pay Conversion Contributions in accordance with the provisions of Section 40 3.2 Application to Participate As a condition of participa- tion, each Employee who is eligible to be a Participant shall execute and deliver to the City, a written application signed by him in which he applies to participate in the Plan, designates One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($1500) Dollars of his Compensation for the Plan Year in question as Pay Conversion Contributions as described in Section 4, makes an election as to the disposition of Pay Conversion Contribu- tions, and supplies any other pertinent information that the City reasonably requires. 3.3 Commencement of Participation Eligible Employees may become Participants only on the Effective Date or on the first day of January of a subsequent Plan Year, Section 4. Pay Conversion 4.1 Pay Conversion Prior to the beginning of each Plan Year, each Participant shall designate One Thousand Five Hundred Dol- lar's ($1500) of his Compensation for such Plan Year as Pay Conversion Contributions. Pay Conversion Contributions shall reduce the Partici- 4 P ant's Compensation ratably on each pay day during the Plan Year fol- lowin g the effective date of the Participant's participation. With respect to Pay Conversion Contributions, each Participant shall elect, in. the manner provided herein, to apply his Pay Conversion Contribu -- tions to the following: a) to increase the Participant's Health Care Maintenance Account, as established in Section 5.1, provided that the maximum. annual increase shall be $1500 and the minimum annual increase shall be Two Hundred Forty Dollars 240.00): or b) to be received by the Participant as cash Compensation. A Participant's initial election as to the disposition of Pay Conversion Contributions shall be made as part of his Application to Participate. Except as provided below, a Participant thereafter may change his election as to the disposition of Pay Conversion Contribution only effective the first day of a future Plan Year, by providing written notice thereof to. the City, in a form acceptable to the City, at least thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of such change. It is provided, however, that in the event of a Participant's marriage or divorce, death of a Participant's spouse or child, birth or adoption of a Participant's child or termination of employment of a Participant's spouse the City may permit a Participant 5 to change or cease his or her election as to the disposition of Pay rsion Contributions effective on the first day of any month byConve din at least two weeks advance written notice thereof to the provi g City, in a form acceptable to the City. Section 5e, Health Care Maintenance Account Plan 5.1 Health Care Maintenance Accounts. The City shall establish for each Participant a Health Care Maintenance Account. Each Health Care Maintenance Account shall initially contain Zero Dollars ($0.00) 5.2 Increases in Heal Care Maintenance Accounts A Participant's Health Care Maintenance Account shall be increased each monthh b the portion of the Participant's Pay Conversion Contribution that he has elected to apply toward his Health Care Maintenance Account pursuant to Section 4.10 5.3 Decreases in Health Care Maintenance Account. A Participant'sant's Health Care Maintenance Account shall be reduced by the r amountm of benefits paid to or on behalf of a Participant pursuantaouany to Section 5.40 5.4 Health Care Maintenance Benefits. Subject to the limitations contained in other provisions of this Plan, and to the extent of the amount contained in the Participant's Health Care Maintenanceenance Account, a Participant who incurs premium expenses for 2 city-sponsored or spouse's employer - sponsored group medical insurance, dental insurance, group life insurance up to $50,000 of coverage or group dependent life insurance up to $2500 of coverage per dependent shall be entitled to receive from the City full reimbursement for the entire amount of such expenses incurred after the first day of the first Plan Year for which he is a Participant and while he is an Employee of the City. The City shall pay all such expenses to the Participant upon the -presentation to, the City of documentation of such expenses in a form satisfactory to the City. In its discretion, the City may pay any of such expenses directly, in which event the City shall be relieved of all further responsibility with respect to that particular expense. Such expenses shall be paid periodically based on accepted claims filed with the . City by the last day of the month preceding the month of payment. Premium expenses for qualifying City- sponsored group insurance programs may be paid directly from the Health Care Maintenance Accounts via direct payroll conversion. 5.5 Forfeiture of Benefits If, at the close of any Plan Year, any amount remains in a Participant's Health Care' Maintenance Account, the Participant shall forfeit such amount. In the event that a Participant ceases to be an Employee, any amount remaining in such Participant's Health Care Maintenance Account shall be forfeited. 5.6 Separate Written Plan For purposes of the Internal 7 Revenue Code, this Section 5 shall constitute a separate written plan providingrovidin for the reimbursement of Health Care Maintenance expenses. other provisions of the Plan are incorporatedTotheextentnecessary , by reference in this Section 5. Section 6. Claims Procedure 6.1 Claims Procedure The City shall notify a person within t hirt y C 30 s of his claim for benefits of his eligibility ordays noneli ibilit for benefits under this Plan. If the City determinesgY tthat a person is not eligible for any benefits or for full benefits, the notice shall set forth (1) the specific reasons for such denial, 2) a specificis reference to the provision of the Plan on which the denial is based, (3) a description of any additional information or material necessary for the claimant to perfect his claim (and an explanation Yxlanationofwhy such information or material is necessary) , and (4 ) an explanation of the Plan's review procedure, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the person*, If a person is determined by YtheCity to be not eligible for benefits or if the person believes that he i s entitled to greater or different benefits, he shall have the opportunityrtunit to have his claim reviewed by the City by filing a petition for review with the City within sixty (6.0) days after receipt by him of the notice issued by the City. Said petition shall state the specific reasons the person believes he is entitled to benefits, 8 or greater or different benefits. Within fifteen (15) days after receipt by the City of said petition, the City shall afford the person and his counsel, if any) an opportunity to present his position to the City orally or in writings and said person (or his counsel) shall have the right to review the pertinent documents. Within fifteen (15) days after said hearing (or the date of receipt of the Petition if the Person does not request a hearing) the City shall notify the person of its decision in writing, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the person, stating specifically the basis of said decision and the specific provisions of the Plan on which the decision is based. Section 7. Administration and. Finances MOMMEMW 7.1 Administration The Plan shall be administered by the City. The City may g andelegate of its powers 'or responsibilitiesY among its employees and to such other agents as the City deems appro- priate. 7.2 Powers of Cit The City shall have . all powers necessary to administer the Plan, including, without limitation, powers: a) to interpret the provisions of the Plan; b) to establish and revise the method of accounting for the Plan and to maintain the accounts and c) to establish uniform, non - discriminatory rules for the 0 ilk administration of the Plan and to prescribe any forms required to administer the Plan. 7.3 Actions of the City All determinations, interpreta -. tions, rules, and decisions of the City shall be conclusive and binding upon all persons having or claiming to have any interest or right under the Plan. 7.4 Finances The costs of the Plan shall be borne as provided herein. For purposes of this Plan, Pay Conversion Contributions shall be deemed contributions by the City. Section 8. Amendments and Termination 8.1 Amendments The City may amend the Plan from time to time. Any such amendment shall be filed with the Plan documents. 8.2 Termination. The City expects the Plan to be permanent, but necessarily must, and hereby does, reserve the right to terminate the Plan at any time. Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any further financial obligations hereunder from and after such termination of the Plan except, such that have accrued up to the date of termination and have not been satisfied.. Section 9. Non - Alienation 9.1 Non - Alienation. No benefit payable at any time under this Plan shall be subject in any manner to alienation, sale, transfer, assignment, pledge, attachment, or encumbrance of any kind. 10 Section 10. Aoolicable Law CITY OF MAPLEWOOD By Its 10.1 Applicable Law The Plan and all rights hereunder shall be governed by and construed according to the laws of the State of Minne. sota, except to the extent such laws are preempted by the laws of the United States of America. 11 DOCUMENT SUMMARY PLEASE KEEP THIS PAGE WITH THIS DOCUMENT This is an identification sheet. It helps us to locate the document quickly on the word processing system. Please return this sheet every time you revise this document. After it becomes final, please f ile this with the copy.. Client # 13027 Matter # 100 Plan # Cost # 143 Sys Acct #: 2 Document Name: 130274 DOC Document Title: C. of Maplewood Hlth. Care Maint Acct Creation Date: 6/4/84 Revision Date: W/P Operator pb Initials) Comments: I. 12 x t DOCUMENT SUMMARY PLEASE KEEP THIS PAGE WITH THIS DOCUMENT This is an identification sheet. It helps us to locate the document quickly on the word processing system. Please return this sheet every time you revise this document. After it becomes final, please f ile this with the copy.. Client # 13027 Matter # 100 Plan # Cost # 143 Sys Acct #: 2 Document Name: 130274 DOC Document Title: C. of Maplewood Hlth. Care Maint Acct Creation Date: 6/4/84 Revision Date: W/P Operator pb Initials) Comments: I. 12 7' t Mr. Daniel F. Faust Page 3 October 16, 1984 IRS "test" case on the validity of such a requirement. However, requiring forfeiture upon termination of employment and therefore participation in the plan may not be required. Regardless, the manner in which the City handles the payroll deductions and premium expenses may not make forfeiture upon separation a problem because no significant amounts maybe accumulated in an employee /participant's account. We simply bring the matter to your attention. As stated earlier, we conclude that the City may leave the payroll deductions as made. The deductions need not be reversed at the end of the year. In other respects, the City's plan appears to conform with Internal Revenue Service proposed regulations.. Enclosed for your review and information is a copy of the new code provision which sets out some reporting require- ments for employers which maintain cafeteria plans. Please feel free to contact us if you have any further questions. Sincerely yours, Dayle Nolan DN:kk 3 TO: , FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNERS: DATE: Request MEMORANDUM F .. / ,lotion by Colmoil: City Manager Endorse Associate Planner -- Johnson Modified,_..._______ Rezoning (BC to R -1) Rejected 1717 -41 Edgerton Street Date City of Maplewood Myrtle G, Koehnen, Robert G. Borowske, 0. R. McFarland and Lester L. Moss November 2, 1984 Approve a zone change from BC, business commercial to R -1, single dwelling. Reason for the Reques t The city council initiated this rezoning as part of its "downzoning" program. This is where the zoning allows a greater intensity of land use than is proposed by the land use plan. The zoning and land use plan should be consistent so that the city's intention is clear. Comments The BC zoning should be removed from this area to eliminate any possiblity of intensive business uses being located within the low density residential neighborhood. Although unlikely, redevelopment of th area for commercial use is possible. This possibility exists because: 1. Two of the dwellings are old enough that redevelopment could be considered. 2. A neighborhood store and gas station formerly occupied the site of 1741 Edgerton Street, 3. The front yard of 1717 Edgerton Street consists of two. undeveloped 40 -foot wide lots. Downzoning this area from BC to R -1 would also eliminate the present nonconforming use status of 1731 -37 Edgerton Street. The double dwelling at 1741 Edgerton should also be downzoned from BC to R -1 because of the significant substandardness of this property for its present double dwelling use. Classification as a nonconforming use- would permit the double dwelling to continue but any expansion would have to be approved by council. If the building were discontinued for at least one year, it would have to be used as a single dwelling. Recommendation (requires at least four votes in favor for approval) Approval of the attached resolution (page 7) rezoning 1717 -41 Edgerton Street from BC, business commercial to R -1, single dwelling. r r BACKGROUND Site Description Size: 07 acres Existing land uses: two single dwellings (1731 and 1737 Edgerton Street) , two undeveloped lots . that make up the front yard of 17.17 Edgerton Street (this dwelling could be accessed from Jessie Street) and a double dwelling (1741 Edgerton Street) The two single dwellings are very old. The double dwelling structure was built in 1971, originally for use as an office .and double dwelling. (See past actions.) The single dwelling at 1737 Edgerton is located on a substandard width lot of 54 feet. The double dwelling is located on a lot that is substandard in area, width and frontage. ( See past action 1-22-70.) Each of the double - dwelling units has its own furnace and gas meter. There is no practical away to remodel this structure for single. dwelling use. Surrounding Land Uses North: unimproved Kingston Avenue right -of -way. Across the street, a single, dwelling East: Edgerton Street. Across the street, single dwellings South: single dwelling West: single dwelling and undeveloped lots without improved street access past Actions 4- 16 -59: A request to vacate Kingston Avenue, west of Edgerton Street was denied. The property owner at 1737 Edgerton Street agreed that if Kingston Avenue were to be vacated that he would lose access to his garage. March 1963: Council indefinitely continued a request (no reasons given) to rezone lots lid through 12, block 1, King's Addition (1745 Edgerton Street) from R -1 to BC. At that time, the property owner operated a small neighborhood store on . the site of 1741 Edgerton Street. They wanted to convert this store to a warehouse and build a new store on the property located at 1745 Edgerton Street. 2- 15 -66: A demolition permit was issued for the store at 1741 Edgerton Street. 2 1- 22 -70: Council approved building plans for an office /dwelling unit structure J at 1741 Edgerton Street: The office area, located adjacent to the lowex dwelling unit, has always been used as a third bedroom for the lower dwelling unit. The present owner of the property, Myrtle Koehnen, has rented one of the units and lived in the other since September 1972, Council of the building plans was subject to: 1. Plans as submitted are approved by council for six months only, if no permit is drawn for the project by July 22, .1970, then council approval is rescinded. (The permit was issued on 3 -4 -70. There is no record of the blueprints that were approved.) 2. The apartment in combination with the office use is recognized and approved by the council for the present ownership of the land and proposed structure. (The property was sold in September 1972 to the present owner.) 3. Kingston Avenue shall be improved by the applicant to a width of 20 to .25 feet and that off- street parking within the improvement be banned and so signed. Further, such street west of Edgerton shall be declared as a public street used for private driveway.purposes. 4 -5 -79: Council approved a zone change from BC to R -1 for lot 7, block 8, King's. Addition (1715 Edgerton) to bring it into conformance with the land use plan. Council initiated this action when considering a day care, request for the property owner. Planning 10 Land use plan designation: RL, residential low density 2. Zoning: present - -BC, business commercial; proposed - -R -1, single dwelling 3. Policy criteria from the plan: a. Page 18 -2: Zoning maps should be updated as necessary to make both land use maps and zoning maps compatible. b. The RL, residential low density classification is primaril designated for a variety of single dwelling homes. An occasional double dwelling may be allowed. 4. Compliance with land use laws: a. Section 36 -485 requires four findings for the approval of a zone change. Refer to the resolution on page 7. 3 b. Section 36 -86 requires double dwelling units to have at least 580 square feet of habitable floor area for one bedroom units and at least 860 square feet of habitable area for three bedroom units. The double dwelling at 1741 Edgerton Street has a one and a three bedroom unit of about 530 square feet and 1254 square feet, respectively. c. Section 36 4MM88 (a) requires a minimum lot, area of not -less than 12,000 square feet for a double dwelling. The double dwelling at 1741 Edgerton Street has 3263 square feet. if Kingston Avenue were vacated the property would have 7178 square feet. d. Section 36 -88 (c) requires a double dwelling Tot to be at least 75 feet wide for interior lots and 100 feet wide for corner lots. 1741 Edgerton Street is a 25 -.foot wide corner lot, If Kingston Avenue were vacated, the lot would have 55 feet of frontage. e. Section 36 =89 requires double dwellings to have at least 30 feet of setback from a street. The dwelling at 1741 Edgerton Street is less than two feet from the Kingston Avenue right -of- way. f* Section 36 -17 (a) states that "any lawful use of a building or land existing at the effective date of any provision of this chapter may be continued although such use does not conform to such provisions of this chapter." Council approved an apartment and office use for 1741 Edgerton, but it was built and sold as a double dwelling. ( See past action for 1-22-70.) Public Works Sanitary sewer is available. Procedure 10 Planning commission recommendation 29 Council decision following a public hearing jc Attachments: 1. Location map 2. Property line map 3. Resolution a 4 6 9 . E ez sia Ego- LITTLE CANADA W i s 35 Q t . cc Ic N 4 SURKE V ±, ELDRLDGE N I E AV.t F- dE L MQK.T t A. s E L M O NOK t 4, •aK AN o 58 Kt MAN AV f AD LA. VERNON AYE1 t : W w MT VERNON AVE m MT. OWNS AVE. tv _ NO O W 60ROSELAWNaW iAVE. IL ° 3 26 ! EE u* 000 AV. t.Lw00D AVE. dEll Y ; 500 t h EsuMMER AVE. 1.. FEN ITON AVE 11 C h p 27 10 KtNGS ' ~ d KEN Rom,G T AVE. VE. 4 c Loke i SS i 57 ST. PAUL , LOCATION MAP 5 Attachment 1 N I F V*i s ST. PAUL CEM E7ERY oil 1 D ;: ( 0101X10 ' 53 t 4:v 1 I b ,, t L 7 tP0.7 +{n 8l ~ IT 0 -7 I ., _ „ .. % < Cr* 11 2b Q- , OW, "a"m• •' * K ` f i aI t . ._ .._ _ a ._ ..ww .._ l.... _ ____._ .mom. 2Z b .1 e 7 ,, 21 a"""' .,.._ _ _ _.._ .. i s. ' r i 40 • 1 • !4a 1 Zp 9 • / .r 4.i, . a. : '' 40 140 t Ab '`' ` t4s ' 'gyp v s :.S '27 426 29 ! 3o - 111 t .... __ I f jE7 Our, 41C J 17 0 A am v ... ... -• 1 • 1745 If IW r .1 4e • 4Q A i4 , I` i TZ 1 too . I AD J 4( ' yp tt± i it t • r. Uni roe .. N. S9 (0 K I NGSTO N741. de A ........ Z 173_7 1' 2 3 24 25 it 27 Z 8 t 3 ! 3 1731 j AP omm, mom am 5P 0 ' 5+ s 15 14 b am maimm 1Cv AV Etrlc 9- 416..0 _ _ . j IL Q ,Tam 10: , A 20 10 f1 .... .. .... .. ...... .:...w. 4444.. - . •.. Wamupoo• ter. • •isa.owa• -A r M • + Q X8 il- 12 J.1 ' : & I r amomm, ..• 3; r..8 .w J1 ...i` ... •' 1 • W1t1d1NCs P fs`• am r"In54444. 1 .. PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 6 Attachment 2 4 N Pursuant to due call, and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city ouncil of the Cityyy of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly calledled and held in the council chambers in said city on the 8th day f November, 1984 at 7 p.m. Y er, The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business commercial to R -1, residence district (single dwelling) forgg the following- described property: Lots 1 through 6, Block 8, King's Addition to the City of St. Paul This property is also known as 1717, 1731, 1737 and 1741 Edgerton Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on October 15, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on November 8, 1984 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity, to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose intentntent of the zoning code, 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare, N f • f 4 . The proposed change would have no negativelogical, efficient. effect upon theandeconomicalextensionofpublicservicesfacilities, such as public water, sew and and ,schoo ls. sewers, police and fire protection Adopted this day f 19Y , 84. Seconded by Ayes-- STATE of MINNESOTA COUNTY of RAMSEY SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersigned, being he duly u •g y q alified and appointed clerkoftheCityofMaplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certifycarefullycompared Y fy that I have Y , p ed the attached and foregoing extract of minutesregularmeetingoftheCityfMaplewood of a y p ewood held on the 8th day of `November, 1984 with the original on file in m •y office, and the _same isafull, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the samerelatestothisrezoning. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the citythisdayof , 1984. City Clerk City of Maplewood, I. 4 A. Rezoning--1717-41 Edgerton Secretary O1 son -said •the proposal i s for a zone change from BC, business commercial to R- l,..si ngl a dwelling. Staff is recommending approval of the request. Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone resent who wished to comment,y P c ent. Bill. Koehnen, 1721 Edgerton, said on that lot it is already developeded wi tyP h a double dwelling, asked if the lot would be too small to add a garage because of minimum setback requirements. Secretary Olson said he is not sure of the setbacks of the house - n the 1oe ot. Also with the existing zoning a could not be constructed there without council approval. 44ary Borowske, 1737 Edgerton, spoke regarding lot size standards of the P astpresentandfuture. She also commented on what people are looking for in neighborhoods. She explained the size 1 ots that are developed for single family in the neighborhood. She said they are all about twice the size of the minimum, She thought the lots should be not restricted to single family.They should at least be R -2. Chairman Axdahl closed the public comment orti on of the meetingPg Commissioner Pellish moved the planning commission recommend the city councily adopt the following resolution: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business commercial to R -1 residence district (single dwelling) for the following-described property: Lots 1 - 6 Block 8, Kings Addition to the City of St. Paul This property is also known as 1717, 1731, 1737 and 1741 Edgerton Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated b the City of Maplewood, ewood pursuant tyyPP o Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission October 15, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the followingfindingsoffact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of . the neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan . i s adequately safeguarded. 10- 1.5 -84 IL 39 The proposed change w•of h g i l l serve the best interests an •the community. where applicable d conveniencesandthepublicwelfare, 4 The Proposed Chan effici public ge would have no negative effect u oent, and economical extension of P n the logical, public water * s services and faci 1 i ti esewer. police and. fire -protection such, as and schools. 5. The same rezoni n to the sout g was .previously-. approved for the property •h. P P y abutting Commissioner Fischer s econded AA •xdahl, Fischer, Larson, Pellish yes -- CommissionersSigmundk, S 1 ette n, Whitcomb 1k . TO: FROM:. SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT /OWNER: DATE: City Manager Associate Planner -- Johnson Conditional Use Permit--Expansion of a Nonconforming Use 1960 Clarence Street Elwood Lyng October 9, 1984 SUMMARY Action by C o •c. r c 11: Endcrued 4 ifie Re j e0tc Date Request Approval of a conditional use- permit to expand the single- dwellin g use of property located in an area zoned for LBC, limited business commercial use, Proposal Build a 24 x 26 foot residential garage. Comments The applicant's single dwelling is a legal, nonconforming use because it was in existence before this area was zoned for commercial use. his means that the single dwelling may continue, but it cannot be expanded without council approval. The addition of the ro osedPP residential garage would not discourage the conversion of this property to the planned use. In fact, the newer garage may have some salvage value that would offset the cost. of converting the site. Council should also consider amending the plan and rezoning the whole LBC district to R -1, single dwelling residential for the following reasons: 1. All of this land is developed with single dwellings or undevc loped. 2. The Soo Line tracks have been removed and the land purchased by the state for a bike trail. Recommendation Approval of the enclosers resolution (page 7) to approve a conditional use - permit. to allow the nonconforming, single- dwelling use at 1960 Clarence Street to be expanded to include a 24 x 26 foot residential garage, on the basis that construction of the garage would not discourage the planned use of the property. MEMORANDUM I BACKGROUNDIk Site Descri tion r Lot area: 16, 800 square feet Existing land use: a single dwelling with aboutgg 116 square feet ofhabitablefloorareaandaneightxtwelvefootstorageshed, Surrounding Land Uses North: a single dwelling and garage, zoned LBC limited busi n ess commercial and planned for LSC, limited service commercial East: vacant land zoned LBC, limited business commercial and la CSC, limited service P need commercial. This property is owned by Donna dunk, owner of the Gladstone House. Southeasterly: Gladstone House (catering service), zoned R-1 singledwellingandplannedf.or LSC, limited service commercial South: a double dwelling and garage zoned R -1 singlen1 ' planned, g • g e dwelling and p ed_ for LSC, limitedted service commercial Southwesterly: Clarence Street. Across the street are Miller Meats Maplewood Bakery and C & G Liquors, zoned BC, business commercial and planned for LSC, limited service commercial Northwesterly: Clarence Street, Across Clarence Street is vacatedtedrailroadright• . of -way and vacant land owned by the city, zoned M -1 manufacturing a •light g nd planned for LSC, limited service commercial. Past Actions This site: 7 -3-=' Council approved a conditional use permit to allow the app]." ant to add a 400 square foot dormer to the dwelling on the basisthat :he expansion would not be significant enough to discourageagefutureconversionofthepropertytotheplannedcommercialuse. City -wide: 8- 23 -82: Council approved a conditional use permit to allow the nonconforming, single - dwelling use of 1960 Ide Street to be expandedtoincludeagarage. 11- 14 -83: Council approved a conditional use permit to allow the nonconforming, single dwelling use of 1942 Ide Street to be expandedbyreplacinga.12 x 18 foot garage with a 24 x 24 foot garage. Planning 1. Land use plan designation: LSC, limited service commercial 2. Zoning: LBC, limited business commercial 2 w 30 Compliance with the land use laws: A. Section 36 -17 (e) states "no existing building or premises devoted to a use not permitted in the district in which such building or premises is located shall be enlarged, reconstructed or structurally altered, unless 1. Required by law or government order; or 2. There would not be a significant effect, as determined by the city through a special use permit (conditional use permit) on the development of the property as zoned." B. Section 36- 442.(b) requires eleven findings for the approval of a conditional use permit (page 7) . procedure 10 Planning commission recommendation 2. City council decision following a public hearing jw Attachments: 1. Location map 2. Gladstone neighborhood land use plan 34D Property line map 4.. Resolution 3 R t =F. Raw R2 — - y - R F R PLID 1• 0 RJOL F F Ml F R ' F= M 1 racf «C L R t R W F (R2) DI dr c R LBC R M ,, , R 3 i LL__ ..++Jl Y M I M M 1 t 4 -.r. . F Ml R M 1 TRUNK war Poe , " rMI -F M1 ECK A C M1 IL qu 4 R ? R-3C R V COWTV ..• . R • TF • ( R2) U ' • E AVE E= 71z R F AY R R3 f o R B C • Of F t Mt • •„r R2 R s ROSE wooc BC [ R f r F I 0 . fR S F r L. 8 C C ! AVE i is R t; ; [ so SB RZ or or F AVE f, I 2p, n e c (M re f R Cl TY OF Sr PALL LOCATION MAP 4 H Attachment 1 do i M h &IM e { A/ o. lop' i 1!s 1. A M . fto IV FV, It i r s 4 J A LEAt n..r zo 4 15 4 5 4 L jy . + r te ' ` 1 3 • x CC A) 51 s 5 18 5 '5 1 s s • s C lal— Are' -78Ir OL 17 v ro L •++ 121 2 „ / 17L o YAN a Sa ale 0 so V oz 1974 - 5 zip 2 -W ac a .. 5 , ' y 1 Z4 - obi _ .1960.- ' • 24 0 1954l — zz •'. X1960 s ZI + 0 '.05 ) ; . ; 4,s — —.-. , 1950 s - w M — — SuioOL plT W9 1942 —9 ,18 . ; o .1V • 1 R, S 13 k- - ,,14 RE. o Z,4 aa 30 jjo R . ..._ FROS - -z 0-- 0 o r. ta.s so 73s 40 40 60 i e,a on ' ..• r. n l R , 1 i ao rn 22d 27 2& 25 29 3 28 s 3 Isis 23 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Attachment 2 4 N of RM JT m RM --- _ Rh major collector =- Saint Paul . City of .. lS R m l 1 varterial Cu P .. -. S i i C . major arteria e n eu r E J• C Attachment 3 4 N Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting fthecitycountitbftheCityofMaplewood, Minnesota was duly g called and held in the counci 1 chambers in said city on theY day of , 1984 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Elwood Lyng initiated a conditional use permit to expand the nonconforming single dwelling use at the following- described property: Lots 4, 5 and 6 block 11, Gladstone Addition, Section 15, Township 29 Range 22 This property is also known as 1960 Clarence Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows 10 This conditional use permit was initiated by Elwood Lyng, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on October 15, 1984. The planningg commission recommended to the city council that said permit be 3. The Maplewood City Council held 1984. Notice thereof was published and All persons present at said hearing were be heard and present written statements, considered reports and recommendations of planning commission, a public hearing on mailed pursuant to law, given an opportunity to The council also the city staff and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings -of- fact: 1. The use is not in conformity with the city's compre- hensive plan but it is consistent with the purpose and standards of this chapter because construction of the requested garage would not discourage the conversion of this single-dwelling site to the planned commercial use. 2e The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district because the other structures. in this zoning district are residential uses. 3. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 7 S The use would not be " hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, g lare, smoke, dust, .odor, fumes, water pollution, water run --off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic.on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or .parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare'of the city. 90 The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 100 The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Adopted this day of , 1984. Seconded by Ayes- - STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMS EY S S . CITY of MAPLEWOOD Y I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of 1984, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permit. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 19840 City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 8 i B. Conditional Use Permit--1960 Clarence (Lyng) Secretary Olson said the applicanticant i s requestingn a of a conditionalPPqgPP use permit to expand the singledwelling use of property located in an area zoned for LBC. Staff is recommending approval, j tj Mrs. Lyng said did: eta permit to install the garage slab. She has nfr Y g g P g g othing to add to the staff report. Commissioner Fischer moved the planning commission recommend the city council adopt the following resolution: WHEREAS, Elwood Lyng initiated a - conditional use permit to expand the nonconforming single dwelling use at the following-described property: Lots 4, 5, and 6, block 11, Gladstone Addition, section 15, Townsh 29,Range 22 Thi s' property is also known as 1960 Clarence Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by Elwood Lyng, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. r E .2. This conditional use permi was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on October 15, 1984 The planning commission recommended j to the city council that said permit be approved.z : NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION that the above - described conditional use permi be approved on the basis of the following f i ndi ngs -of -f act: 1. -The use is not i n conformity with the city's comprehensive plan but is consistent with the purpose - and standards of this chapter because construction= of the requested garage would not discourage the conversion of this- single-dwelling - site to the commercial use. 2. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compati with the character of the zoni district because the other structures in this zoning district are residential uses. 10 -15 -84 6 G 30 The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potenti - surrounding. land uses, due to the noises, glare; smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only ,minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The uses would be serviced b essentialy public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessi additional requirements at publ c.o.st for publ facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the ci 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use woul cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Commissioner Sl etten seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl, Fischer, Larson, Pellish, Sigmundik, Sletten, Whitcomb Commissioner Fischer moved the planning commission recommend the council consider amending the plan and rezoning the whole L6C district to R -1, single dwelling residential for the following reasons: 1. All of this land is developed with single dwelli or undeveloped. 2. The Soo Line tracks have been removed and the land purchased by the state for a bike trail. Comms i s i over Whitcomb seconded Aye's--Commissioners Axdahl , Fischer, Larson, Pel l i sh, Si gmundi k, S1 etten, Whitcomb MEMORANDUM TO FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: City Manager Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner Plan Review, Parking Variance and Canopy Setback Variance _ 743 N. Century Avenue Raymond Muckala Raymond, Marla, Marie and Merle Muckala Action by Cou_T: In "N" Out Market Canopy Installation September 21, 1984 Enored__._.___..__ SUMMARY Reque 1. Approval of the site plan and canopy design. M o d i f i e ReJecte Date 2. Approval of a five -foot canopy setback variance. Code requires a front setback of ten feet. 3. Approval of a parking variance.. Code does not permit a rkin inp9 front of service stations and there is presently parking in front of the In "N" Out Market, Proposal The applicant is proposing to replace the old gas tanks, install new pumps and install a canopy with a height of 19 feet. The existing pumps south of the building would be removed, Comments The proposed pump island location will function ade uatel for trafficqy flow. Its location, being five feet further from the building, will al make traffic maneuverability easier in front of the store, The canopy, being five feet closer to the street than code requires, would not create any visual obstructions and would not be any closer to Century Avenue than the A and W canopy to the north. Code requires that parking spaces be located to the side or rear of the building. This is to permit the attendant inside the building to have an unobstructed view of the pumps. Though there is parking in front of the In "N" Out Market, the attendant at the cash register is located at the southerly end of the building, so the intent of this requirement would be met. A condition of this parking variance should be the striping of the parking spaces in front of the market and the posting of no parking signs in front of the south half of the building on the east side. Recommendation 10 Approval of plans, date- stamped 9- 10 -84, which propose an 80 -foot long eight - dispenser gas pump island and a 30 by 90 foot canopy for the In "N" out Food Market, subject to: 1 4, a. Approval of a five -foot canopy setback variance and a parking variance by - the city council. b. Striping of the parking spaces in front of the In "N" Out market. c. Posting of a "no parking" sign, . painting the curbing yellow or any other means acceptable to the city that would prohibit parking on the easterly side of the south half of the building. 20 Adoption of the resolution on page 11 approving a five -foot canopy setback variance for the In "N" out Food Market at 743 N. Century Avenue, on the basis that: a. A ten foot setback would create the hardship of traffic circulation problems between the building and the cars at the pumps* b. The spirit and intent of the ordinance would be met, since the canopy would not look overly close to Century Avenue, due to the adjacent A and W canopy already being that close to the right -of -way. 3. Adoption of the resolution on page 13 approving.a parking variance to allow parking in front of the In "N" Out Market at 743 N. Century Avenue, on the basis that: a. The spirit and intent of the ordinance would be met since view of the pumps by the attendant inside the building would be unobstructed. b. A hardship would be created since there is'no other convenient place for the store customers to park Approval is subject to: a. Striping of the parking spaces in front of the In "N" Out Market.. b. Posting a "no parking" sign, painting the curb yellow or any other means acceptable to the city that would prohibit parking on the easterly side of the south half of the building, 2 y BACKGROUND Site Description 10 Lot size: 1.27 acres 2. Existing land use: Maplewood Auto Service and the In "N" Out market. Surroundin Land Uses Northerly: A and W,restaurant Southerly: Minnehaha Avenue and McDonald's restaurant Easterly: Century Avenue Westerly: single dwelling Past Action 9 -4 -8 g : Council approved a - s i gn setback variance for a pylon sign at the southeast corner of the applicant's property. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 10 Land use plan designation: SC, service commercial 2. Current zoning: BC, business commercial 30 ordinance requirements: Section 36- 158 (a, b and n) state: a) The setback of any overhead canopy of weather protection, free standing or projecting from the station structure shall be not less then ten (10) feet from the street right-of-way line nor less than twenty (20) feet from any adjacent property line. b) The total height of any overhead canopy or weather protection shall not exceed twenty (20) feet. n) All outside parking spaces shall be located to the side or rear of the principal structure." 4. Statutory requirements: Section 367.10 (subdivision 6 (2) of state law requires that the following findings be made before a variance can be granted: ak. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. b. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. KI 4 Undue hardship" as used in connection with the rantin o99 f a variance means the property in question cannot be pot to a reasonable use if used,under conditions allowed by the official controls. The li ht ofPgthelandownerisduetocircumstancesuniquetohispropertnotY.created by the laylandowner, and the variance,if granted, wil not alter the essential character of the locality. jC Attachments 1.Location map 29 Property line /zoning map 36 Site plan 49 Canopy photo 516 Applicant's letter dated 9 -11 -84 6.Resolution -- canopy setback variance 70 Resolution-- parking.variance 80 Site plan -- separate attachment 4 1 ItARY1.A1 RD. • • WY • Ir[ p O Troller Court prWote) 212 E UA*YLAND 31 E Ros7:.AVE T o [ 6 ) v 7 Bto NAGUOLIA AVE •: Q o o •'Lake - ac 68 69 10: : o ASE a • ! tiAR T o AvE• s• ~ W M r 32 _ W 212 W LE L4. BRAND AVE:- T. 7TM AVE. Z E. ? T AVE. ! 2530 ' Rtt'Ir DeistAVE. ' A AV 70> 34 E. MAR AR A E. S *M AVE.:: t iRE1K0 3M CONWAY AvE ICE R0. •: r is3 MATCH LINE . LOCATION MAP 5 attachment one 4 N f 4 i i r i i J • Liz _ .nr NN..W y Sh IN WS 1410 am h r wr 3 w• J . Cr - - • CL `— t 5. ... 2 7 dib asuo AM cE 3 Cif z = tr Q t.1 I 1.44 .: V & W Restaurant v• c i ow q2iLfb 2 05. I Out r et U 1 Z Ch 14EHAHA _V Em 4"1 McDonald's restaurant PROPERTY LINE /ZONING, MAP 6 attachment two 4 N J , 3 IN N" OUT MARKET 1 attendant's area 3 o t7 Or- MAPLEWOOD AUTO SERVICE Y Q t Li.. H Z C3 C cn Y c R3 . C N x v) ; Av i O Q o+ i q 0 Q 30 W W Q F — W V 1 4 N I .•+` moo. cqA truer , '•e / +•..:. " • Y KMaK M ras n w • i rw.. % S r - '"L'' ..ter = - •. ' - — r IL R r f P -15 ob PROPOSED CANOPY 4 fascia; 15' ceiling 8 attachment f our Q N t In 'N' Out Food Market 743 N. Century Avenue Maplewood, HN 55119 September 11, 1984 Board of Appeals City of Maplewood 1902 E. County Road B Maplewood, M 55109 Gentlemen: The purpose of this application is to secure permission to improve our property. In order to provide insight into our situation, please allow me to give you sstae background. The service station industry has changed remarkably in the last few years. With the demise of the full service, repair -type of facility, we have seen the advent of the self -serve gas and convenience grocery store. The large chains have taken over an ever increasing share of the market; Tom Thumb and Super America being prime examples of this. In order to be competitive, small busi- nessmen like myself have been forced to adapt to their marketing methods or see a gradual erosion of our businesses. In most of our communities, these companies have erected canopies over their gasoline islands and are offering the public very clean, neat, and attractive stations in which to purchase self - service gaso- line and groceries. Since our resources are very limited, we cannot afford to tear down our existing building (as Super America did on White Bear and I - 94) or build a new one next door has Tom Thumb did on Century and Lower Afton) in order to achieve the desirable layouts that everyone would prefer. Therefore, in laying out our plans, we have to modify less of our property than they do and still be as attractive and as modern as possible. We presently have two gasoline islands totaling 60 feet with 14 dispensers. These are laid out to be served from the old station part of the building, which is the south end, and the layout was designed for full serve. In 1979, we purchased the Norm's In 'N' Out Grocery next door. In order to be more competitive, we combined the gasoline and grocery stores. Presently, our tanks are 25 to 30 years old and need to be replaced. Our south PUMP island is still in the wrong place and needs to be .moved in order to com plete our gasoline /grocery layout. We now need a canopy in order to modernize. We have a very limited area in front of the store ' to work with and the challenge is to try to be able to serve.our customers with as much fueling capacity as we had before and still wake it as convenient and uncongested as possible. Therefore, we Have tried to draft .several layouts to address the problem. First, with the double island layout, the only way we can f it the pump dispensers in front of the store and retain store parking is to use the layout shown. Second, with one long single island, we have a traffic congestion in front of the store. Since we cannot move the building, we wish to locate the islands as far from the build - ing as is necessary to facilitate traf f is f low. This places the canopy within 9 ttnr.e* C4 1 Board of Appeals September 11, 1984 Page 2 five feet of the right -of -way line. This poses no esthetic problem as you view our site, since you can see that the edge of the canopy would line up with the other structures and utility poles in the area. It would provide a much more pleasant and attractive setting than now exists. Several years back, the setback on our property was increased from 33 feet to 49.5 feet from the center of Century Avenue. This contributes to the aforementioned layout problems. The spirit and intent of the law is to establish criteria to keep the city beautiful and uncluttered while at the same time serving the needs of our people. We believe that this is our express purpose.. over the years, we have continually attemptedted to upgrade our business and to serve the people in the best manner possible. The council has already seen fit to grant us a variance to allow our sign to remain closer than the revised setback allowed, They recognized the spirit and intent of the law and the unusual layout of our corner. Therefore, we ask to have a setback variance extended to this improvement. Thank you, Ray kala In 'N'. out Food Market R1V j mk 10 v Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting f the of he g 0 city council t City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of 1984 at 7 p.m. . The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Raymond Muckala applied for a variance for the following- described property: Lots 15, 16 and 17, Block 1, Cahanes Addition This property is also known as 743 N. Century Avenue, Maplewood; WHEREAS, section -36 -158 (a) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires that overhead canopies maintain at least a ten foot setback from.public right-of-way; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a five foot setback, requiring a variance of five feet; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance. was applied for on September 10, 1984. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Community Design Review Board on September 25, 1984.. The board recommended to the city council that said variance be . 3. The Maplewood City to consider this variance. pursuant to law. All perso opportunity to be heard and also considered reports and planning commission. Council held a public hearing on Notice thereof was published and mailed ns present at said hearing were given an present written statements. The council recommendations of the city staff and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 10 A ten -foot setback would create a hardship of traffic circulation problems between the building and the cars at the pumps. 2e The spirit and intent of the ordinance would be met since the canopy would not look overly close to Century Avenue, due to the adjacent A and W canopy already being that close to the right -of -way. Adopted this day of 11984* , Seconded by Ayes -- 11 attachment six I F, STATE OF MINNESOTA ) • 1 /ni v i COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) .SS.5 ; t.l r CITY - OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and .: y q appointed clerk I of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of 1984, with the original on file in my offic and the same is a ful :l, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this variance. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1984. City Cl City'of Maplewood 12 Pursuant to 'due call and notice thereof a re ular meeg ting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held.in the council chambers in said city on the day ofY F , 1984 at 7 p.m.t; . The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Raymond Muckala applied for a variance for the following- described property: Lots 15, 16 and 17, Block 1, Cananes Addition This property is also known as 743 N. Century Avenue, Maplewood; WHEREAS Section 36-158 (n) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires parking spaces to be located to the side or rear of the principal structure; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to retain the existing parking spaces in front of his store requiring a variance; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on.September 18, 19.84. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Community Design Review Board on September 25, 1984. The board recommended t the city council that said variance be 3. The Maplewood City to consider this variance. pursuant to taw. All perso opportunity to be heard and also considered reports and planning commission. Council held a public hearing on Notice thereof was published and mailed ns present at said hearing were given an present written statements. The council recommendations of . the city staff and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact 1. The spirit and intent of the ordinance would be met since view of the pumps by the attendant inside the building would be unobstructed. 2. A hardship would be created since there is no other convenient place for the store customers to park, Approval is subject to: a. Striping of the parking. spaces in front of the in "N" Out Market. 13 attachment seven b. Postin' a "no arkin " s'g P 9 i gn , painting the curb yellow or anyothermeansacceptabletothecitythatwouldprohibitparkingonthe easterly side of the south half of the building. Adopted this day of ,1984. Seconded by Ayes__ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMS EY ) S S CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby Certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of 1984, with the Original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this variance. 0. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the cityy this day of , 1984. City Clerk City of Maplewood 14 1' t' C. In "N " out Market - -canoe lan review parking variaYP . p g nce and canopy setback) Raymond Mucka 1 a, was present at the meeting, Secretary E kstrand explained the provisions fn the code why parkingisrequired. Y king variance r or. Muckal a said he woul like to move the concrete posts to i4ront of trhere the attendant is so no one can park there. Parking wi to permi ttedyheretheexistingpumpsareHesa - the cano 'py will be 15 feet from gradelusanadditional3to4feetfortheheightofthe .fascia. Board Member Juker asked if there could be some shrubs or som typeoflandscapinginthelast5feetbeforetheright - of -way Mr. Muckal a said it is not practi because cars do have to a ableb to pass one another at that location. The board reviewed surrounding development with the ap and SecretaryEkstrand. Board Member Juker moved the board approve the tans date-sta - -p p 9 to s4, which proposes an 80 -foot long eight - dispenser gas pump island and a 30 b90footcanopyfortheIn 'n' out Food Market, subject to 1. Approval of a five -foot canopy setback variance and a arkin variancepg by the city counci 2e Striping of the parking spaces in front of the In 'n' Out Market and be continually maintained 3. Posting of a no parking" sign. painting the curbing yellowow or any otherSYy means acceptable to the city that would prohibit parking on the easterly side of the south half of the build" ng. Also the board recommends the city council adopt the following resolution: WHEREAS, Raymond Muckal a applied for a variance for the following-described property: Lot 15, 16, and 17, block 1. Cahanes Addi This property is also known as 743 N. Center Avenue, Maplewood;Y WHEREAS. Section 36 -158 (a) of the Maplewood of ordinances rede ui resq that the overhead canopies maintain at least ten foot setback from the public right -of -way;s WHEREAS the applicant i s ro i f •`• •p pos ng a five foot setback. reobi ri ng a variance of five feet; WHEREAS., the rocedural history of this varian iPYe s as follcfws. 8 9-25 -84 1. This variance was applied for on September 10. 1984 • 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Community Design Review Board on September 25, 1984. The board recommended to the city council that said variance be approved. ' low NOW. 0THEREF RE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY Q' SIGN REVIEW BOARD that the above - descry bed variance be approved on thebaste of the 'f oI l owing Findings of fact: L. 1, A ten -foot setback would create a hardship of traffic circulation problems between-the building and the cars at the pumps. 2. The spirit and intent of the ordinance would be met since the canopy would not look overly close to Century avenue, due to the adjacent A and W canopy already being that close to the right of way. The Board recommends the city council adopt the following resolution: WHEREAS, Raymond Muckala applied for a variance for the following-described property: Lots 15, 16 and 17, block 1, Cahanes, Addition This property is also known as 743 N. Century Avenue. Maplewood; WHEREAS. Section 36 -158 (n) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires P Sarkin spaces -to be located to the side or rear of the principal structure; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to retain the existing parking spaces in front of his store requiring a variance; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on September 10, 1984. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Community Design Review Board on September 25. 1984. The board recommended to the city council that said variance be approved. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESLGN REVIEW BOARD that the above-described. variance be approved on the basis of the f of l owing findings of fact: 1. The spirit and intent of the ordinance would be met since view of the gumps by the attendant inside the building would be unobstructed, A hardship would be created since there is no other convenient place for the store customers to park. r Approval i s subject to: a s 1 Stripingn of the parkin spaces in front of the In 'n' Out Market andPgS be continually maintained. 2. Posting of a "no parking'' , sign. painting the curb yellow or any means acceptable to the city that would prohibit parking on the easterly side of the south half of the building. 9-25-84 Board Member Peterson seconded Ayes --all TOO FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT /OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: Action by CoLmC1a : MEMORANDUM Endorse boo dif i e....._._.. ReJecte City Man DaY Associate Planner, Johnson Planned Unit Development Revisi /Plat and Street Vacations Geranium Avenue and Evar Street Castle Design and Development Company Sterling Glen September 10, 1984 SUMMARY Request 1. Revi the conditional use permit for the Maple Greens planned unit development to substitute 64 rental apartment units (eight buildings) for 52 quad units (13 buildings) 20 Vacate the plat and streets. Proposal 10 See the applicant's site plan on page 8. The applicant has agreed to make the following revisions to comply with minimum code requirements: a. Increase the parking stall depth from 18 to 20 feet. b. Increase the separation between the open parking stalls and the dwelling units to at least 15 feet. 2. The applicant will initiate the court proceedings required to Vacate the Sterling Glen plat on this site (block one and lots one, through 36 of block two) , once the revised site plan is approved. 3. The change from town house to apartment -style units and the vacation of the previously platted public right -of -way will result in a density lower than originally approved for the site as part of the Maple Greens planned unit development. 4. The units will be rentals. 59 The applicant is in the process of applying for council approval of tax - exempt mortgage revenue financing for ;this development. 6. The dwelling exteriors will be constructed with low maintenance materials. Comments Poor soils make the construction of the public streets for the previously approved site plan cost - prohibitive, as explained in the applicant's letter on page 10. The proposed site plan eliminates the need for public streets . With the revisions stated in item one above, the new site plan is consistent with the zoning code and the density originally authorized for this site with the Maple Greens planned unit development. Recommendation Approve the enclosed resolutions (pages 11 and 14) vacating the plat and streets and amending the conditional use permit for the Maple Greens planned unit development to substitute eight eight -plex apartment structures for the 13 four -plex town house (quad) structures originally approved south of Geranium. Avenue along Evar Street and Jessamine Avenue (presently platted as block one and lots one through 36, block two, Sterling Glen Addition), subject to: 1. The applicant vacating the underlying platted lots. 2. Construction beginning within one year of council approval, unless council authorizes a time extension. 3. Adherence to the site plan dated September 11, 1984, with the following revisions: a. Increase the parking stalls to 20 feet of depth. b. Increase the separation between the open parking stalls and the dwelling units to at least 15 feet. 4. Approval of the site, building and landscape plans by the community design review board. w BACKGROUND Site Description Size: approximately'6.1 acres Existing land use: undeveloped Easements: Evar Street and Jessamine Avenue would be vacated along with all of the platted lots that made up this site. Surrounding Land Uses North: Geranium Avenue. Across the street are quads, double dwellings and two single dwellings. East: a double dwelling and two single dwellings all fronting away from - this property. South: an unimproved 33 -foot wide portion of Magnolia Avenue right- of -way. (Consideration should be given to vacating part or all of this right-of-way.). West: a single dwelling on large lot and quads. Past Action 7- 26 -73: Counc approved a conditional use permit for the Maple Greens planned unit development (PUD) as shown on page 7. Fifty -two quad units (13 buildings) were approved for the subject site. 7- 20 -78: council approved a preliminary plat for the Maple Greens 3rd Addition. It contained the subject site as approved for development in 1973, 12- 13 -82: Council approved the Sterling Glen Addition final plat, It encom -- passed about two - thirds of the Maple Greens 3rd Addition preliminary plat and all of the subject site. This final plat did not alter the preliminary plat configuration approved in 1973 for this, site. Planning 1. Land use plan designation: S, school (southwesterly portion of the site) and RL, residential lower density. 2. Permitted density: the density for this portion of the Maple Greens planned unit development was approved at 33 people /net acre. 3. Proposed density: 26 people /net acre. 4. Zoning: planned unit development 3 5. compliance -with land use laws: a. Section 36-438-(c) states "the development (planned unit development) shall conform to the plan as filed with the city. Any substantive variations from the .plan shall require recommend ation by the planning commission and approval by the city council after a public hearing." b. Section 36-442-(b) requires ten findings for approval of a conditional use permit. Refer to findings one through ten in the resolution on page 11. c. Section 36- 442 -(d) states "the proposed construction must be substantially started or the proposed use utilized within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may grant one six- month extension of the permit if just cause is shown. This requirement shall not apply to PUDs with an approved phasing plan." d. Section 36 -109 (2) states "Minimum parking stall size shall be ten (10) feet by twenty (20) feet, except that parking stalls for owner - occupied units may be reduced to nine (9) by eighteen 18) feet." e. Section 36 -109 minimum distance of five (5) feet from 6. Design review: The must be approved by building permit may Public Works 3) states "An open parking stall shall be a fifteen (15) feet from a dwelling unit and any abutting property line, side or rear." final site building and landscaping plans the community design review board before a be issued. 1. There is no public need to improve the half width right -of -way that borders the south property line of this site. It would also not be cost - effective to improve due to the lack of benefiting properties and the steep grades. 2. A water tower is proposed to the south on the school property or the smaller lot to the northeast of the funeral home (page 6) . A water main easement Will be needed within the right -of -way along the south boundary of this site for this water tower. Procedure 1. Planning commission recommendation. 2. City council decision following a public hearing. Attachments 10 .Locution map 2. Property line 39 Maple Greens PUD 4* Site plan 5. Proposed building elevation 6. Applicant's letter of request 7. Conditional use permit resolution 8. Vacation resolution 4 t ' t • W R,, :` i R R F MI R2) t Pu D, 7 MI i M2 W ARO% Ar RD R • 8 r „_ Cr R3 z gyp . R2 . R! BC Ail Q a R _, • is , I R U R o:E , r s q.cs•fQ .. WE i nF R R 10 15 — / R i s. F A•` U. i R j n•• t s A - 3/ R tn R M I B 1 R Cw *AY N, E 8C M 2 M2 - 1 LOC'ATI'ON MAP 0 attachment one 4 N M : 6 9 I 3 I r 7 or 1 > C/ !1 iO .r 4 i.'+ G t^ L O -• 7 ! t — h- 2 3 b 7 10 I I 14 19 T s ST. rs ljl 4 f r s - o lei, _ QMt! !. ± !fit . r ! F ,s C • ` &V r!1 t • G s ? j I 1 ~'• 4 / qtr Z31 07340 2 1i Q f t ( ` •a Az I z+. 1 l ,•25 J1 t. 7 6 `w12 7' S gI iw ..t 1' i st . u I 't It ? 2 3 -: 1 4 1084 A D I ION 2i a 20 $ 13 12 9 a 5 c T w 6 8 1 OIL. a BEAVER L KE ELEMENTARY Maple Oaks N'SCHOOL Funeral HomeSCHC%W'LL t,r i S T , _ N 622 4 x 00•• ) (4 99•) 1465. 57 T. 10 j os PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP The platted lots and streets will be vacated once the proposed site plan is approved) 6 attachment two 4 r .. OIL o ' r loop' ' • '' wow a RTM V da tt{1 ' j fi • • ' i •V N,,'i' tA V0, a h• btu E. }• 'I TE •• Y , . ? . ,, 1 • pit z ! L { R• , .. r . l •,,• fi 1 '' r • 00.4 - t n ` . •.mot- r W. . . if j r . 'fir 1 1 3irt ` ' ffi• l •' . 1J 4 E • U i 1. j •' /. U • .. • f..: TESQUAtj dpi I , r • . 7 IT lu 4Q f —010 saw love MAPLE GREENS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TABULATION NORTH. APARTMENT SITE: 170 UNITS TOWNHOUSE SITE: 44 UNITS SOUTH APARTMENT SITE: 110 UNITS QUAD HOME SITE: 128 UNITS DOUBLE HOMES: - 16 UNITS SINGLE FAMILY HOMES: 22 UNITS TOTAL: 490 UNITS SUBJECT SITE 13 uad struct es or 52 -dwe1 i i n I -units e 0, V t • MAPLE GREENS MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 7 attachment three 0 r ,5fl./ Y _ sue ` 3H'•,tZTom... '- •tij - _r. a C L r.t r _ pia / ` " ice + =+. A vV'ytr1 "fIDiF1 '1Ms MY. wu. L... PROPOSED SITE PLAN ('September 11, 1984) 8 attachment four 4 N r Y 1. OMf i /.i•n..J.R ((( t 1 i war` PROPOSED SITE PLAN ('September 11, 1984) 8 attachment four 4 N 1 s t. I do S EU iU lots n s N 1 • 1 P .. RI 3 i Desi n Development Co. Inc. & Develaf9 P 2419 No. Maroare, St. North St. Paul. MN S5109 Phone 770 -6138 August 10, 1984 Maplewood City Planner City of Maplewood - 1380 Frost Maplewood, Mn. 55109 Dear Sir, Castle Design & Development Co., Inc. is proposing to redo Sterling Glen Addi tl on. When we obtained the property the present plat had been approved as a preliminary plat. We started construction and proceeded to complete a short section of Geranium Ave. I We found that the soil condition and water table were such that the cost tripled to what the street should have cost, the Ci Engineer concers with this fact. The portion of Sterling Glen whi we are proposing to repl at has Evar St. loop which we feel would even be worse to try to construct. Seconds the 4 unit type home has lost its appeal to the market and we feel we must change the type of constructi We will , - as you see, be -going to the rental . market as there has not been any new rental unit built in Maplewood in quite some time. Sincerely j enneth D. Gervai s vi ce` -Presi dent KDG grs WO' !Us' 7 10 attachment s i x Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of V 1984 at.7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Castle Design and. Development initiated a a revision to the conditional use permit for the Maple Greens planned unit development at the following - described property: Block one and lots one through 36., block .two, Sterling Glen Addition, Section 25, Township 29, Range 22 WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by Castle Design and Development, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on September 17, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be . 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 1984. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered - reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described conditional use permit revision be approved on the basis of the following findings -of -fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 49 The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, - water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 11 attachment seven 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 70 The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8.0 The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the wel f are ' of the city. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 100 The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 11. The revision is consistent with the original planned unit development. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant vacating the underlying platted lots. 20' Construction beginning within one year of council approval, unless council authorizes a'time extension. 3. Adherence to the site plan dated September 11, 1984, with the following revisions: a. Increase the parking stalls to 20 feet of depth. b. Increase the separation between the open parking stalls And the dwelling units to at least 15 feet. 4. Approval of the site, building and landscape plans by the community design review board. Adopted this day of , 198 Seconded by Ayes- - STATE OF MINNESOTA C COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS 9. CITY OF MA PL EWOOD ssy4 1 I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk cf the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of 1984, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permit revision Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1984. City Cle City of Maplewood, Minnesota 13 1k Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the clay of 1.9.84 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Castle Design initiated proceedings to vacate the publicinterestinthefollowing - described real pro : ertpP Y Block one and lots one through 36, block two Sterling Gleng Addition, Section 25, 29, Range 22, including Evar Street and Jessamine Avenue WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. This vacation was initiated by Castle Design, 2. A majority of the owners of property abutting said streets have signed a petition for this vacation. 3. This vacation was reviewed by the planning commission on September 17, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the citycouncilthatthisvacationbe . 4. The city council held a public hearing on , 1984 to consider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city taff andy planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE. IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood City Council that it is in the public interest to grant the above- described vacation. Adopted this day of , 1984s Seconded by Ayes- - STATE of MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD j 14 attachment eight r r j I, the undersigned, being the duly qual ified , and app'oi'nted clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of 1984, with the original on file in my office and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to vacation of a plat and streets, r r, 1 Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1984. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 15 s C. PUD Revision: Maple Greens Secretary Olson said the request is to revise the conditional use permit for the Maple Greens planned unit development to substitute 64 rental apartment units (eight buildings) for 52 quad units (13 buildings) and to vacate the plat and streets. Staff is recommending approval of the request. Ken Gervais, Castle Design and Development Co, said the preliminary plat which became Sterling Glen from Maple Greens,were in place when they purchased the property. Since that time, they have found that the quad buildings do not have a good market as it is over built and also it is difficult to stabilize streets in the area. What they propose is clustering eight unit buildings. Mr. Gervai s indicated there will be three handicap units on the base floor 1 evel . The exterior of the b u i l d i n g s wi 1 1 be maintenance free. The garages w i l l be hardboard siding. Commissioner Whitcomb moved the pl anni n commission recommend the c i ty_._coun.ci. pado t the followinglowiado resolutions vacating the plat and streets and amending the conditional use permit for the Maple Greens planned unit development to substitute eight eight -pl ex apartment structures for 13 four -pl ex town house (quad) structures originally approved south of Geranium Avenue along Evar Street and Jessamine Avenue (presently platted as block one and lots one through 36, block two, Sterling Glen Addition: WHEREAS, Castle Design and Development initiated a revision to the conditional use permit for the Maple Greens planned unit development at the following described property: Block one and lots one through 36, block two Sterling Glen Addition, Section 25, Township 299 Range 22 WHEREAS the P rocedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by Castle Design and Develop- ment, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on September 17, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be approved. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described conditional use permit revision be approved on the basis of the following findings -of -fact: The y1,Th use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. t s The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or di strubi ng to the present and P otential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust odor, fumes, water pollution, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, el ectri cal interference or other nuisances* wouldd enerate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets6. The use w g y and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs t will cause undue burden to the area properties. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protecti utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 90 The use would preserve andincorpDrate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 11. The revision is consistent with the original planned unit development. Approval is subject to the following conditions: I. The applicant vacating the underlying platted lots and street rights - of way from the Sterling Glen Addition. 2. Construction beginning within one year, unless council authorizes a time extension. This proposal shall be considered part of a phased develop- ment for purposes of a time extension, if necessary. 3. Adherence to the site plan dated September 11, 1984, with the following revisions: a. Increase the parking stalls to 20 feet of depth. b. Increase the separation between the open parking stalls and the dwelling units to at least 15 feet. 4. Approval of the site, building and landscape plans by the community design review board. 5. Submission of an erosion control plan for approval by the city engineer. WHEREAS, Castle Design initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following-described real property: Block one, lots one through 36, block two, Sterling Glen Addition, Section 25, Township 29, Range 22, including Evar Street and Jessamine Avenue WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. This vacation was initiated by Castle Design. i 2. A majority of the owners of property abutting said streets have signed a petition for this vacation. t E . 3. This vacation was reviewed by the planning commission September 17, 198410 The planning commission recommended to the city council that this vacation be approved. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPL.EWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that it is in the public interest to grant the above—described vacations Garrett seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Barrett,Commissioner El lefson, Larson, Pel 1 i sh, Si gmundi k, Whitcomb 4 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Council will conduct a public hearing on Monday, October 8 , 1984 at 7:40 p.m, at the E count Line Fire Station #2, 2501 Londin Lane. -" APPLICANT: castle Design and Development Co. 2419 N. Margaret North St. Paul, MN 55109 REQUEST: Revise the conditional use permit for Maple Greens planned unit development to substitute 64 rental apartment units (8 buildings) for 52 quad units (13 buildings) and to vacate the plat and streets. LOCATION: Geranium Avenue and Evar Street ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER ARE INVITED TO ATTEND AND BE HEARD If you have questions or would like further information, call the department of community development, 770 -4560. The city council must make the following findings to approve a conditional use permit. Please try to address how these findings are met or not met in your comments. 10 The use is in conformity with the city's Comprehensive Plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 29 The establishment or maintenance of the use shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use shall be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of the zoning district. 4. The use shall not depreciate property values. 50 The use shall not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsight- liness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 69 The use shall generate only minimal vehicular taffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or arkin needsP9 that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 70 The use shall be served by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 84, The use shall not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and shall not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 90 The use shall preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use shall cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 1.1. The city council may waive any of the above requirements for a public building or utility structure, provided the council shall first make a determination that the balancing of public interest between governmental units of the state would be best served by such waiver, I #i TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: City Manager Building Official Appendix E -- Sprinklers May 13, 1983 Proposal MEMORANDUM l • 1 Adoption of Appendix E (attachment one) , by reference to the State Building Code. Adoption of Appendix E would permit the city to require the installation of sprinkler systems in new construction, additions and with a change in the type of occupancy, where. such sprinkler systems are not now required. Attach - ment two describes the .types of occupancies affected. Attachment three gives examples of how Appendix E would have affected three buildings in Maplewood if they were built under. Appendix E. Authority Mi nnes.ota State Statutes, 1980 Section 299 F Ol l Subd . 4 prohibits municipalities from establishing requirements in excess of the Uniform Building Code. Appendix E was developed by the state to allow municipalities to establish uniform additional standards above and beyond the basic provision of the State Building Code. Purpose- Adoption of Appendix E has advantages to the city and building owner. 1 . Increased fire protection. This amendment is highly endorsed by the fire marshals office and our three fire departments. (See attachment four.) Sprinklers provide increased protection for life and property. 2. Reduces property losses. Attachment five shows the property loss sav i ngs that occurred with sprinkler systems in Edina and Duluth. A ,five -year study of insuranceL losses by Factory Mutual shows buildings without sprinklers had nine times greater losses than spri nkl Bred buildings. a comparison of two Edina apartment bui 1 di ngs ,one spri nkl ered and the other not spri nkl ered, the s pri nkl ered 13 -story building suffered 1,000 loss and no deaths. The unspri nkl ered four - story building, which had heat detectors and an alarm system, suffered $70,000 loss and two dead. In Minnesota Mining (3M) states that 98'/0 of their industrial fires were suppressed without fire department personnel in buildings with sprinkler systems installed. The balance of 2% were shelving and other hidden areas. 3M building 220 6th floor loss was 2 112 million . one -third of the floor was damaged by fire. Prior to this fire they chose not to install sprinklers in the total building at a cost of 3/4 million dollars. After the fire, all office buildings in their system not previously sprinkl ered have had the systems installed. 30 Allows more flexible construction. Under the building code, the installation of sprinkler systems allows larger allowable areas, additional stories and substitution of one -hour fire resistive construction in some cases. 4, cost savings to building owners It could be possible, based on square footage and occupancy, to build a required steel or masonry building of a certain type of wood construction with sprinklers i nstal ed , realizing cost savings, other req.0 i rements are also lessened with sprinklers travel distance to exits and the elimination of required fire alarm systems in. public buildings and apart - ment buildings. Manual pullstations result in unncessary false alarms to the fire departments. The building owner benefits by a reduction in insurance costs, often with a payback within 7 to 10 years, depending upon the type of occupancy. 5. Reduces manpower needed for the fire stations Manpower for firefighters during daytime hours is becoming increasingly difficult to obtain due to increased commitments to work. The building owner, therefore, should take the responsibility of protecting his property. Reduction i n . personal injury reduces manpower, since firefighters man the medic vans as well. This is an option, not a mandatory provision, based on local fire suppression capabilities. Some municipalities will not adopt this appendix. Initial construction costs would be increased. However, the benefit to the city in maintaining level of fire protection in the face of additionala construction and restricted budgets supports the adoption of Appendix E. Recommendation Adopt the enclosed ordinance (attachment nine) which adopts the new Appendix "E" to the State Building Code, requiring sprinkler systems. ic enclosures 1. Appendix E. 2. Types of Buildings affected by Appendix E 3. Examples of applying Appendix E in Maplewood 40 Fire Marshal's memo 59 Property loss comparisons 6. Water and manpower requirements 7. Statement of need and reasonableness 8. Report of the hearing examiner 9. Code amendment Attachment one: APPENDIX E Department of /administration Codes and Standards DivisiBuilding Adopted Rules Governing Amendments to the State Building Code Entitled Proposed Optional Appendix E Automatic Fire Suppression Systems Rule as Ad . opted Z MC•AR 6 1.10020 Optional provisions for installation of cm- premises fire suppression systems. A. Purpciw. 'I'hi• ride airthori /c% optional pi-ovi %lon. It r the irr.t :illation or tm prenilw% fire ,upprc%%itn %)-mem• in nev ctnmiruc'tion. It is intended to alieviate increa %ing demands for addit Wrial fire suppres.ittn rc%t)trrcc% by .ono" ing a municipislit) tt• itio i the oriitnal provision• of this. rule based tin it% local fire .uppres%itm capahillile%. 11. Munit;ip.s l option. 'Me sprinkler %ystent regtiiremen* 1% in C. may he adopted without change h% a municipalit) . if thq- are dt.pied. the throti the numic ipahly fOr nev+ htti1ding%. ;nldii ons to building., antl building. lot w 1ii: tlte• a«:upanc % cia..ilical itrt IN changed. C. Reel irement %. Autornatic %prink - ler system% mtro he insta and maintained in tpe•rahle• condition in huildings in the t «tth :ttc c1:•itic :litn listed in L -12. This re•yttir is in additit n it) Ober minimum re4uiremcnts set in the state building ctiJe. The height and area increa%e• provided" in .ec•lion. 506 and 507 of the Uniftrm Building Code. ar% adopied in the •late httilding code tlx: 4e are applicable. 1 . Group A -1 occupancies. Group A -2 occupancies with an occupant load of ZtKI ur more•. Group A -2.1 occupancies. 4. Group B - I service %tations %kith 30M or more gro%% sq. ft. of area. not including canopies. 5. Group 1.3 -1 parking garages with 5.W0 or more gr o%% sq. fl. of ar' ca. f. Group B -' office% and post- %econdary cla.srttnt. with 8.5M tit more grt ...y. ft. of area or three or more %ttirie• in height. 7. Group B -2 retail. warehotj%e. or mantifac•turingtirea. %k ith'.t ir nit rc• tart •• .y. ft. of arca o three or mine .ttries in 1tc•ight. 9. Croup E - and E - twetipancie` with 8.5M or noi gross %y. ft. in area or ivt or more .torie% in height. except for nimor additions that do not int:r<<t.e the occupant load or significantly increase the fire Itad. cl. Group E - occupancies with an occupant ioad or 3() or mitre. Ill. Group H -a occupa with 30K) or more grit%% sy. ft. O are•it. il. 0 It -i apartment hou%e•, «ith 8.5W tit more gtt...y. h. tWarea tit with dwc1ling unit% tin three or nuire lloor%. except thit when they are not required by Uniform Building Code. sections 1807 or 1907.• or tither pro% of the Male building. Code. automatic sprinkler systems within dwelling units in :apartment ocrupancie% are con%idered complete v. -hen Protection is provided in all habitable room%. Building officiaN. in ctmc•urrent~e• with their fire chiek. may accept alternate system, f" eA which have fire protection capabilities equivalent to systems which comply with Standard 38 -1 of r the Uniform Building Code. d 12. Group R - 1 hotel% and motel% with 8.5M or more gross sq. ft. of area or with Vilest rooms tin three or morc ntior.. KEY: PROPOSED RULES SECTION — Underlining indicates addition` to existing rule language. $tit eth indicate deletions from exiting rule language. If a proposed rule is totally new. it is designated "all new material." ADOPTED RULES SECTION — Underlining indic;tc% additions to proposed rule language. lie oui indicate deletions from Proposed rule language. CITE 7 S.R. 1519) STATE REGISTER. MONDAY, APRIL 18 1983 . PAGE 1519 Attachment two: Types of Buildings affected by Appendix E Group A Occupancies are dining rooms, drinking stablishments auditor'9 auditoriums and other places of assembly where people gather. All occupancies in this category,wi th an occupant load over 300 persons are requiredred to be s P ri nkl ered by Appendix E. q Group B. Occupancies are primarily offi retail stores, warehouses and manu- facturing areas. Occupancies in this category will now require sprinklers i .e. an office b u i l d i n g with 8,500 gross square. feet of area or three or more stories must be spri nkl ered. Under present code a wood frame offi building could be built with 8,000 square feet, two stories in height and not be spri nklered. A smal retail store of 2,000 or. more gross square feet or three or more stories in height would require sprinklers. A retail store of wood frame construction of 2,000 gross square feet is not required to be spri nkl ered under the present code. Group E Occupancies are primarily educational facilities and facilities for day care purposes. The requirement in this category does not change appreciably. Group H Occupancies are hazardous areas, handling of hazardous and flammable liquids, wood working establishments, areas where loose combustible fibers or dust .are manufactured, and spray painting shops. Group H -4 is a repair ga rage with an a area of 5,100 square feet in type V construction. Appendix E would require sprinklers for 3,000 square feet or more of area. Group R -1 Occupancies are hotels and apartment houses. Under present code apartment houses of frame construction would allow 6,000 square feet and two floors. Appendix E requires sprinklers for 8,500 gross square feet or with dwelling units on ' three or more floors regardless of type of construction- - wood frame, masonry, etc. Group R -1 Occupancies , , hotels and motels under Appendix E would require sprinklers if the building had 8,500 or more gross square feet or with guest rooms on three or more floors, Attachment Three: Examples of applying Appendix E in Maplewood Hol i day Inn Holiday Inn was built in 1977, has 29,500 square feet per floor with a total of 59,000 square feet. Code did not require fire supression system. Appendix E would require the system at 8,500 square feet. Commercial area of Holiday Inn has 16,674 square feet on one floor. y . The Code in effect when this motel was constructed allowed 10,100 square feet of area and with sprinklers permitted doubling of area to 20,200 square feet. Therefore, the commercial area of Holiday Inn is sprinklered to accommodate the number of square feet in this area. Appendix E would require sprinklers for all occupancies with occupant load over 300. Cricket Inn Cri cket Inn has 116 units , 4 floors, 45,569 square feet total wi th 11,367 square feet per floor., The structural elements of this building are noncombustible, therefore, the present building code would allow 27,000 square feet, 4 stories high, without a sprinkler system The recommendation of the Fire Marshal's Office required sprinklers,, thus it became a condition of the Design Review Board and Council. The motel is sprinkl eyed. Appendix E would require sprinkler system at 8,500 square feet or 3 floors in height. Emerald Inn Emerald Inn has 68 units, fiv.e floors with approximately 30,000 square feet including the penthouse. Building Code today would allow Emerald Inn to be built as a 4 -story motel without sprinklers. However, the building is fully spri nkl eyed, due to the five stories, to comply with the Code. Appendix E would require sprinklers at second floor because of area. MEMORANDUM To: Building Inspector MargeFrom: Fire Marsh A. C. Schad Subject: Appendix "F" Sprinkler Systems The.. new Appendix "F" to thee State Building Code is now completed and hasbeendocumentedintheStateRegistersuerVolume9oerne ). Humber 42, dated April 18,1 It would be advantag that " M which would require an Ordinan approved 9 t this Appendix F be included I n the 1982 BuilCode, whi by Council action. Thi appendix is highly endorsed b the •9 y y • e Ci ty s fir services from the threecontractdepartmentsaswellasthiofficeandwersupportandarourgeyourdepartment ssvPpppvalinobtainingningtheadoptionrequiredredblaw.by We reco i end your department proceed forward i n •f P obtainingng the proper OrdinanceorCodeenforcement. ACS: Js cc Director of Public Safet fire Departments COF''Y 6730 AVER1E 4 stories Approx. 10 years old Beat Detectors TbroUghocit 7ype I Fire Resistive Apartment Within Dwelling Unit Living Ram,/Hallway . Rocn Urnccupied) Clothes Basket Ignition Source Unknown) Occupant Entering Zb contents, Ha11 Closet Tb Carpet/Interior Hall Door to Corridor Open Rb Public Corricbr Interior Finish Rated Less than 25) To Adjoining Apartment Open fir) 2 Dead X70,000.00 5 g i nes 24 es 2 A rs 5 1 3 7 lien Attachment five CCH PARISM M ED AP T= e property 1,000.00 1 Dg ine 8 men i 7151 YM AVM , M SOLM 13 stories 10 years old 4N Type I Fire Resistive AN'Apartment -- E1 de r ly F7 RE I=T"ION Within Dwe Unit FIRE ARM Living Roca Rmn Uro=up ed) FLRE Plastic Decorative Wreath Candle) ALERT Sprinkler /Alarm FME 7b T`elevis ion Set inet Zb INTall Rang ings, Picture Frames Cr nn 003= ' Sprinkler T= e property 1,000.00 1 Dg ine 8 men i C0iV3:A.RISOx4 Two Duluth Building Fires 222 East Second Street Senior Citizen tpartments Type 1 Fire Resistive Senior Apartments Within Dwelling Unit Livin zoom Occupied) Papers (Pipe) Smote .alarm Smokers, Pipe to newspaper To lagazine tact To Overstuffed chair Spread of Fire checked Sprinkler 3 , 000.00 CONSTi UCTI MI — OCCUPAN C ... F I RZ LOCATIO FIRE APZk ..-- FIRE Sr-IRT RT FIR£ GRMITH Imam LOSS -- j West Junior Hig 3 Stories Type 1 Fire P e 'sstiv School Sc Of f ice Office Wooden Desk Custodian arriving for work Desk To Office furniture Office gutted Fire checked by closed office door Smoke sprea through school by way of ven system. 111 1 0 000 - Q. Iii hYi hts of Fire. in the V S. 25- a g e booklet that. Ls a y com?rehansive study of deaths, in Sol la r loss and inci- dents on national, state and local levels reveals some interesting facts about Americs • s fire cxperieace. order of severity the five Mast dangerous occuv&nrias for f ire f ighters are minuf acturing, basis int3astry, storage, stores and off i:es, and vacant and con - struction sites The fire death problem is espe- ci3l ly serious in large cities, and rural ommunities. Medil m sized I ities have the lowest fire death rates. The death rates in most rural areas are the highest, higher even than large cities. Rural %teas and big cities have highe dollar losses par capita from !ire than do said -size cities. Copies of the report are available from the Federal Emergency Manage - ment Agency, 500 C Street S.W., WAshington, D.C. 20472 z. soar inklers Re3uc,e rooerty _Losses A recent five -year study by Factory Mutual System shows that dollar toss due to fires in buildings without sprinklers are nine -tires g rea ter th losses Ln sprin'Klered buildings. Fires in buildings with sprinklers averaged a $32,000 loss, compared to a 5201,000 loss in non- sprinklered fl rofle: t i! 3 . Firebug Game sroc` Ares Out of grin The country's fi service has succeeded in ha-Ang vi 3eo game brochures for irtbug" taken out of print. The game has been changed to ,an ' is ca ?e ga and u; i n g the five -story ma t .. The alve r- t i s i ng copy has been modified to reflect the iescaoa from the burn- ing building the-moo The coot' originally encouraged participants to skillfully burn the building and escaoe detection, Promotion of the game brought a general uproar from fire service, Law enforcement and the insurance industry. The -Minnesota di stribu- tor of the game agreed to remove_ the product from retail shelves following contact with the President of the International Association of Arson Investigators, Minnesota Chaoter, Bruce Ryden. Los Angeles Sues to Recover Fire- fighting Costs In what Los Angeles city attorneys believe to be an unprecedented case, the city has filed suit against a plastics company to recover the costs of fighting a fire at its plant. The city con tends the company was grossly negligent in the storage of highly flammab materials on its prem-- ises and had failed to correct legal violations a`ter being order to do so. Contending that the hazardous storage - ass the cause of the fire in May, 1963, Los Angel`s seeks to recover $200,4 in expenses plus $1 million in puni- tive damages. The comoanv already has pleaded-no contest and paid a 4400000 fine for vi Dla = ion of the fire code. Attachment six lt-eoretically, one 9a11rn of water per minute applied in a fog pattern shr>uld have e.m,xgh cooling poet to extinguish. 100 cubic feet of fire inwlviN ordinary cun5ustibles. Zeus, to be able. to extinguish a fire in two floors of a 1500 square foot hcme (8 €aot oeil rgs) u].a =eQ' 1500 X 2 = 3000 3000 x 8 ! 2400 24000 100 = 240 GPM requir gallons z minute per 100 cubic s r ss i oc expertsis t 3 or g . P'E , for sLFireuppe • i cal aod tons , which allows ._ t for fire exting'j is. m ent under pr acct waterfee re read the 'difficultyiculty in applying th s as oQe l i rag s wh i s n i d fire spread, form to be e as r by . the theoretical f d i r ecd cn the seat of the fire 'Y valid. hoses is related to the re f i hters rewired to maneuver the The n:rer of fire 9 fighterThejollowingareminfire size of the e streams. I requ i r mments cn hose streacrs . l0a Chi - 2 - 3 • 250 GPM - 3 - S • vers an average of 1.5 gallons of water per A t cal sPr lnker head tell utthatg r nat anal or g an i z ati als indicates minute, arr3 the ca to of various wi th ore fires fn r inklered buildings are extinguished three fourths of all f sP two sprinklerinklr heads going off. cc two . nand Decisions and r at ions , as ten, Fire Attack 1 1g ?3, National Fire Protection ASSOci ativn, 60 Battery March Street, s , 02120, JP9 . 81 f, Association, Fire Strew Practices, 1980, Irate rna ti ana 1 Fire Service Training Associa State University, Stillwater, Okla. Fire Protection Publications , Dkl a . 74078, pg. 1580 t Ak J Attachment seven STATE OF MINNESTA DFPARTmE2JT OF A*h7INI STRATTON In the Matter of the Proposed Rules of the Department of Administration Governing Amerdrents to the State Duilding Code entitled Proposed Optional Appendix E Autanatic Fire Suppression Systems STAMPMTr OF RM AND RUO.. Zhe above captioned rules are a propcxsed optional aPaendix C';a ter toP the State Building Cade which authorizes municipalitiesties to require on-sitepaeqv fire suppression systems %n certain occupancies. The proposed rules are ree&ad to authorize municipaiities to actP t fire S Lr ression regvirements, esta5lished through information obtained from na i ona lly - r ecogni zed experts, to a rotecti oat level higher than curen*P 9 -IY authorised. MN Stats. 1980, Section 299F.011 Su .bd. 4 prohibits manicipolities Fran establishing requirements in excess of the reqjire of the Uniform Bulld*ng Coclo. adopted pursuant to M Stats, 1980, Section 16.83 to 16.867 (State Bailding Code). Zhe arbpticn of rules establishi ng standards for additional an site fire suppression system is necessary to rmiYype t municipalities to obtain standards of fire suppression capabilities not in conflict with provisions of the State Building Gbde when i t i s determined by the mun i cipa l i 1 ty that additional provisions are necessary and cast effective. The agency's authority to promulgate the proposed rules is contained in M stats. (1980) st 16.85 and 16.86. The expansion of fire suppression and prevention capabilities is necessary for public safety in buildings located in a n9 P''andimunici hies. A primary oozern of growing Mmici 1ites is to establish balance of publicPaaP'u and pr i va to sector financing for fire suppression protection in ne build INS where bl is sector fundingPurag 1 ucu is haVe been reams. Z'bese rules are a reasonable approac •PP ch to fire suppressi on the l level because resources for ' •1pal fire &par tments are lime ted to arun i c current or reduced expenditure levels. 7he level of fire fighting and preven provided is exclusively a local deter 7he eoon=i c feasi andd reasonableness of adopting iform regulations •n'9 ations in excess of the State Building9 Conde snsst be de te rmi ned the municipalityc' •by ipality provide the services andProviding those bearing the expense. the establishment of tional rules •ap les for adoption without charge are based an a study of rya ti onwi de -trend •s of the fire suppression capabilities s of Inm i c ipal fire 6epar beenis . 7h is provides mun i 'P c pa . i t s es a method to establish reasonable additional standards bas •based an local capabilities,i t yes . Dur i rig the 1981 session of the Minnesota •a Legislature, a b111 was i ntrodu eed rm i tti local unitspermittingits of government to enact ordinances r eq j l r i n g on -site fire suppression stems as the de •SY y esned appropriate. 1 a to . Zee legislations1ation Passed the House and was considered the Governor 'by Goverment Operations CaRtnl t tee of the Senate, where test imon was offered in 'Y oppositition to the bill. one issue Of opposition was that the uniformity rov ' • •p i ded for i n the State 8 i l d i ra g Code would be destroyed designers, developers mina builders .ope i lders would be subjected W A vast array of requiremen ?be chairman of the Senate oornnl t tee recumen&ea that all a f fected r t i es • at t •pa empt to resolve their differences through the rule mak roeess of the Acrni n ' 'P i strat ve Procedure Act. Zhe Director of the Buildingldi Codes and •n9 Standards Division subsequently appoi a vcxnrn i t tee to review the issues n vivoled and reoorrrnend how they l might be best resolved. T •9 hst •ng of C=Mlittee rs is attached . _ to this statement. Mchibit 1) ?fie oclrmi ttees first meeting as on JulylY 16 , 19 8 ] and after a aeries of 16 t i s the finalna1 (4th) dr an9draft of the proposal was tpleted on May 26, 1982. Du i the ccmi ttee c3e ling be rati cns Input was ire ce i vied f r am roan resource r sans includinglud iYpein9fireprotectionengineers, f re rtment ac- ninistrati personnel , m •F mechanical engireers , the concrete industry, sprinkler industry, insurance industrYy, Garr 1 ttee meribers and of he rs . Several i of orma t i onal meetings were held with ar .. h ' .tec is , b 11 d i ng developers, building owner and managers, budding fficials and others, rs, ana draft copies were revised followin in t f ra n concerned persons9P pe The consensus of the cCXO ' i ttee was to propose an op` i ona1 appendix chapter to the State Building Code that could be a3opted, without change, at the de s cr e t i on of municipal gave r n , Similar to the . e x i s t i appendixn9 chapter D relating to building secirit . A measure of uniformity would thusYy be tra i n t a i ne d so that per sons affected could quickly ascertain whe the r or not the appendix chapter had been acbpted by any given municipality, so that structures would be designed and constructed accordingly. 7he carmi ttee believes this approach will be a long term solution to existing and future problems. Although Minnesota Statutes c3o not mandate that municipal i ti es pr ov i cue fire protection for their citizens, many municipalities are endeavoring to maintain a proficient level of ' f ire otection in 'pr the face of add 1 t iona]. Construction and restricted budgets due to cutbacks in resources. Muni cipral i ti es firmly believe that by providing for built - in f ire sup Systems in new oonstr ucti ors, they can maintain a reasonable degree of protec t i acs wi thc)ut building &W i t i onal f ire stations obtaining itamingnewequipment and supplies, and recruiting additional r Bonne l . Add i t i ona l resources wcwl dP'e l 1 also be reweSsary, to prcyvic3e or-igoi training of ma •n9 ng peal, 1 ntanenoe and operation of u i t and bu i d' fightere'g' P • 1 ln9s, as well as additioral fire f i g salari Zbe cast of rovi a3itionaPn9 l services involves both initial Capital outlay plus continuous r ram 'p vg rya intanerue acs ts. The Fresno California Cranicle attached to this statgn (Exhibent 12) supports the effectiveness of this i tian. In -P spite of considerable grcp* th in area and population, fire c3epartment staffing,ng , eau 1prnent ard number of stationsio-1s was not substantially increased. Recently adopted OSKA regulations impose add i t iona2 training9 req ,ji rements " safety equipment provisions •Y Pm P ons wh ch Places an additionalt ona 1 burden an the ability of mun icipal iti e ; to provi f ire rotection 'p service wi • reasonable beget levels. Zhe added training requirementsgeuiresnents may be a deterrent to obtaining volunteer fire fighters due 'to increased ocmni gents on volunteer fire fighters time. Service of full t*lne i d fire fightersh 'pa g ters is beyond the budget limitations of t municipalities in Minnesota.Fa OSHA Subpart L. rederal Register Vbl, 45 Rio. 179, Sept, 12 1980 Sec. 1910 'P't . 16. A listing of paid and volunteer fire departments in the state is attached to this statement Exhibit #3)0 he Vdnnesota Fire Chiefs Association has, for years, advocated the extensive use of automatic sprinkler systems in buildings to control or extinguish fires and reduce property damage lasses . In addition theY9y are txncerned about the life safety of building occupants and fire deparment personnel who must enter buildings to suppress fires. Statisticsn9upP shawo that multiple death losses are very are in buildingss i w' - 'Y ng equipped th sutcmat c spr i nkler systemsteas thr •Y ought. Property losses are greatly recluced in buildings protected throughout by autcmatic Sprinkler systems. Manpower needs are reduced dramatically when buildings are protected with automatic d ; •• a inklerso isocxs of fires in P rable buildings withoutswithandw' • i nkl ers are at tacked to . this statement (EKhibit #4)0 Edina -- Apartment Wilding fires; Z c hf ield Sub Center; Duluth rbnent Bu ildin 9 The installa of sprinkler systems is recognized by the present building code as providing additional fire safety protection, allowinYP g larger allowable areas, additional stories, and subs t *tut ion for 1 hour fire resistive construction in sane Gases , • Borne cost savings can be realized when the code is researched and applied to a i ven c3es n. i9 g A Conce has been expressed by mug t i -f arnily housing 6evelope rs that increased initial is will be ',a deter rent to devel opm nt - of much lower and made r a to i ncaree housing, Experience has shown that there is much less clean up and re- oonstz ucti an after a fire in a s i nkle r ed apartmentamenpzpat Wilding, thus allowing re- occupancy of tin i is i ckl after a fire, 7be earlyaNyY teoccupancy results in additional pay -back of initial investment. Tenants are bone f i tted by the acid i tional saf ety provi dec3 by . autcrnati c spr inkler protection. In the proposed rule an exception to Zr Section 1,10020. C.11, was incorporated to allow acceptance of sprinkler systems that would provide Protection at minimal acxs t r water sly demands. for extinguishment of fires with tease lines are much greater than when automatic sprinklers are used. Fires u~su3lly grow rapidly in their early stages, delayed alarms cc long response times are bericus obstacles to fire extinguishment. On -site extinguishing systems99 9 Y provide an alarm when the sprinkler system is actuated heat of the fire, thus providing an early alarm as we 11 as aonta i rne nt or extinguishment of the fire, Page S Small fires are usually fought with 1--lf2" vase lines r 'Y 9 eqU r ing 2 nee n per 11 ne . Lar ge fires requ 24,/2" hose lines reed 3 or 4 men per hose 1i rye The majority of fires set off a max imm of 2 sprinkler heads with a discharge 15 to 20 GPM. Water manpower requirements are attached to this statement Mchibit # S) Fire resisti vans tr ucti on is required by the code in many Ins Experience by fire and building departments, and investigations after fires has sy'7o*n that fire resistive assem5l i es have failed baring fires. She of the factors causing failure are as follows: 1. Many sub- contractors are involved and none of tl* n has total responsibility to assure oampli ance. These sub-contractors include ceiling installers, electricians, insulators (thermal and accrssti cal l , sheet metal and ventilation installers, plar-'>ers, mun i ca t i ons people and others, 2. Fr eg ue nt ly , inspectors and plan review pe r some 1 are not sufficiently experienced and trained to detect all deficiencies in Ilex assemblies. 3. Many building departments are urtiders taf f ed, due to budget dons tra i nts . 4. Remode of buildings often gives rise to the use 4' of substitute materials and as a result ceilings or walls are no longer fire resistive, and com r t mentat i on is negated.Pa Page 6 n f ire ession of forts are underwat y cm r nt s :nus t , be • mad L ' to gain access. In many instances this will cause the fire to read •Spread f ran its original w>ur ae . Fire fighters advance hoses into s to i rwa s end corridorsY to attack fires. When this occurs, the fire resistive character of such vital life safety areas is defeated. Autwatic sprinklerinkler protection tends toP'r Pz' offset the hazards which prevai when fire resistive assemblies have been re gated,ted9 • Minnesot cities are developing a pattern of maintainingini a rrann'9 P n9 mower level in their fire c3epartments Which is minimally ufficient to extin wishYg the aver age size Muse fire • W:-en the provisions of proposed Appendix E, based on occupancy classification area hazard, are combined with a minimal l Y suffi fire depar to ent an table level of f ire extinguishmentisheenPngt capability is achieved. Group A Occupancies (Pjblic assembly) ac=nodat ing 300 or more persons, wMa 11y have 1 ar ge open areas rather than sna 11 ccsnpa r tments Czrrpartments help contain a fire. Fire in a large ovmpartmnt can readily defeat a small f ire fighting force. Sprinkler protection is needed in order to contain an incipient fire. 7is reduces the chances of pan in a large crowd attempting to flee a growing fire allows a smaller fire fighting force to extinguish the f ire, 4t* square footage limitation for Group=8 service stations is restricted due to the nature of the ovcupar,cy. Flammable " combustible liquids greatly increase the fire loading in these occupancies. Ven in a small square footage occupancy flamable or stible liquids fire can readily a+erocme an average fire fighting force. Page 7 69 Groom S8 (par king garages) awns • • a fisting of large -open areas, not allow storage tither than au tmobi 1• •S • The spacing of the autam bi les and the fact that f i res f n an auto are norurally oantained within the e 'ng l..ne or passengers r tment ovi de sourp'r a Clegree of assurarsoe in keeping a fire E isolated. Due to this fact the asgv re footage 1 im i to t i our for parking garages eras established at 5,000 squa fee •t. 7h i s i s more liberal than the Croupou 8-P 1 service s t a b orss true to the lesser ha z ard . Group 8-2 (offices and t -sewn •pas secondary al ass roams y , were assigned a square footage limitation of 8500 sou •are feet. T'tse occupancl es are dided into' f ai r ly small nor r bments which •ich contain a moderate fire loads of normal combust Due to this factfact t •he c= i t tee determinedrmined that the square footage limitation could be fine 'increasedaced above the more restrictive r u i r ? is of the occupan groups p .y 9 p ly listed. The height of a building is a critical factor . 3 r d I es s of •Reg square footage, the aver f ire departTtent Vuld still require a3ditional i •equ and mangier to gain access to buildings of over two stories . . Zhe Group B-2 (retail, warehouse and manufacturing Occupancies) , were assigned a square footage limitation of 2000 uare feet. These types of occupancies rormally contain a high loaning of rornial cama2stibles, densely stored in an open area Group E - 1 and E - 2 Obcu ci es (K 12 • P sd=ls were assigned a are footage limitation of 8500 square feet. The characteristicstics of these occupanci are similar to Group 8-2, offices and t-pos seaorxla ry el as s r oa ns . K -12 schools are r ised of smaller r tmen Zontainiswhycd help a fire. Page 8 lb Group H4 Occ ies (repair garages) were assigned a maximLyn square9gsqe foot limi tat* an of 3000 re feet. H- n •cies have welding and cutting operations, as well as other open flames used in areas where flanma bl e liquids are stored and disperysed . H -4 Oac nc i es have .upa ve a greater probatllity of fire with such fires being ore severe in nature due to the highly99Y f l arcrable and aambust i ble contents. It* Group R -1 0=upancies (apartment houses, hotels and motels) were ssi gnred a maximm square foptage limitation of 8500 ' square feet. Zhc characteristics of these o cies are similar to Grain S-2 offices and post - secondary classroans as to oampartmentation " oarrLbustible contents. R -1 Occupancies,, where the occupants are sleeping, creates a life loss potential not associated with B-2 Occupancies. Hotel and motel c=uoancies also present the problem that sleeping occupants are not familiar with their surroundings which also increases the life loss potential . R -1 occupancies require a high level of fire department ranpower for evacuation and rescue pur es • All testimony reoe i ved at the hearing will be given due cons i &ration and incorporated into the proposed rule if determined necessary " reasonable. Date: f c • L 42=SaAN __ 1 RR. WIV I SS I C;"M Wage 9 r , F Attachment eight 4 t! 7T Q K C" I C2 or AM IN"Urm V2 WJWR 21 2M the Pb t ter of ttae ft c o"d W ht of the r ts+ent of Aft i n i s tra t ion rn• REP ? Cr 7w in4 . to to the Sts to Building 03& 1F Dc Dow. INIM w ti ti ed Pz'o OQt i 0M Appendix i AW tOMA tf C Dire ress ion 9yste The atco* -Mitt 6e setter case On !br Ma r ing before era ri ng betiner Peter Co trick son of the State Off ive of mini s tra ti.a to i ri np at 9:30 & .a. on Wd- nes.3ay, Jam ary B 1"3 in Mom toe of the pLstro Swart Su fi lding, Seventh and tivbert Streets, St. foul, Kinmsois . Lrty D. Sta rns 1pec181 Assistant Attar- 0 nay ter* rsl, 301 Adain f stration Building, SO Sherburne Avau e, lt.. Paul, Kim*- Sou 551 aver red an behalf of the Building Codes and Sta da rds Division of tk a ttirsneicxta D*a rAftnt of A i ni stration fe reinaf ter "S MI) . Richard Drnaks , Assistant Di rwtar for the SM, James Seim, brp-rty Chief of the miluft Fire Mope t, Arad Sivert Wndr is wn, Building Official for the City of Si Chfi a ld, spa rod and testified for the l= In of the rules. I h e ring CWtinu.d until all interested qro - of pers=s bad bid an op;ar- tuni ty to testify corcerning the adPr:ian of the rules. this art #hall be m it able for & vv w to •13 affected Wivid"sals r ,pest for at Lust five working days befOTe the agercy takes any !`urthsr 4 c- t1on an the rule (s . !t rSLtnt to Kira • state f 11.16 (198 2 ) , the 0=1 ss i over Of the tie pa r of himi n i s t ra t i oo sha 11, if he pr qp"S to adopt the rule as 51 1 herein, OttEl t the rule, tape the t with the oampl a to hearing record to the ettornty Gwaral and rdwdl be ragxxo t ble ftr n0ti fyinq peravns who have indic,tsd th:t thwy w.Lsb to be ratified of anori filing. If the Q=issloner wakes && r9w In the rule ottwr tb m those taraded beta f n, be Mall su*ait eve rul a vi t h the Weill a to %Wring rsaard to the Chief Rearing ftw i r e r for • ow of the danges prior to subaitting it to the Atto& y ral for re- vier. Ufth d uravn 811 the tee t iaony, txh i bi is , " written cc wnts , the ee a r ing la;s finer wakes the followings M3 OF PVT on boudw 11 1"2 tht SM ii led = the following fta with the Oief Darirq emdr err 4) a copy of 0w P2 nags. 6? lh* Order for tearing. iC 1 '!1~e Ibt ioe of era rLng p t Hosed to be 1xvued .. . idi d StatOwnt of the nomber of persons a to attend the hearing and p t ins tad length of the hpencY' • pmsentst tan. to on r 9. 1lt2, a lbt of lbaring end a Cq y of the tvles were publ ishad at T ttste 14q fie tat 23, pp. Sib -idt. 3• L On r 2. 1 "2, the SM ri lod the lbtioe of e.ar ing to all par - s 8sscsciations l,o lard togistned their rows with the I= !br the put4p pore of svm1w mx:h aerie.. hI i r s, 1"2, the N= tiled the following ftwoorits with the lira rirq Uminer s tai the vbtiew of 01barinq as wiled* 1b) Tv A?crs lx cwrti f icstion that its as l 1 inq 1 ist w ra and compl c) ?he A f idrvi t of Obi ling the lbtice to al pre sans on the A9q ' l s list. id) Te Sta tit of arid blue *= 0 to ). 2e gears of IN= pa raanne l . pera= r*2 rho will arpreem the kw-cY at the hearing tapether with the t of ate• attar wi t-*$mv sol ici tad by the kercy to r an its behalf. If A espy of the State A4 i ste t containing the Propowd rubs. Tlw vw.rs m ilsbl a for ion at the Cxtiae of kicinistr.: t ire Bearings f rao the !sate of f ding to the date of tte teatirq. 5. ?he rfcord tame i ned open th r mvh Jam w ry M 1"3 for the receipt of written C= is arld Bu tower ts, the period baying bran tes5ed by orde of the Rearing Ummirw to =calendar dvyv following tt* lea ring. d. Statutory aithori ty to the P=y rules is contairo d in Kitn. State of 14,15 aed 16.56 Q96?) • T. turirq the 1961 loq isle tIve sans i.on, a bill was intrad cw permi ttfnq local uni of to onset ordinances rvi ring was its fire - s ion sys t ems as was &V d appropriate. 12h ix legislation passed the base of ire aenta t ices act was =wide tied by the Owen a e: tal tperatians Cbmi ttee of the Sea ter wte re test in6m in op vei tion to the bill was heard. Lane irsue raised was that the unitomity pt•awidod in the state Building Oa3e voul d be pea troyee w d designers, drvt l ope rs snd builders vault be subs mctad to a Test at rsy of rn- itownts if local Qoverrseew. tal units were allowed to past the own f ire suppress icn ordirw=vs • She Cha i ems of the Senate Calmi ttee r1aow- mc3ed tf at all affected parties attempt to t lve their d if f e rennet thmuglh the rule •ga k i ng process of the A&arris tea t,3 v% Act. ire !Director of ttae building and Standards Division 935603amt1y wpcinted a ocmittee to nevi Ow the issuers 1"MI atria to= Wnd how they . sight best be resolved. I* C=Ittse first wt an duly H 1961 and, afftr a series of 16 witt.ings, tto final (fourth) draft of the proposal Was aaapletsd on dry 26, 1W. During the i ttse del ibe rstions, lout was rase ived f ram many resource persons, including f ire protection wV invers, lire depa r t aw t. 08- ainistratise persrorml, mode sical engineers, the cacrete irdustty, sprinkler industry, inruranoe Wustty and c 011ttrt iestxrs, aonq others. Sewral in- for¢a ti or al ere tings nets Meld with arm i tents , building lc;* rs, bui ldirq Am*rs and ianegers, " building offlerisls. Draft ccples +err m isod follow bq input from all of tic I a Ca lr+di Vi 60 3-in r do do .._... 4P ....40 40..4P _.._ 1 sw s 6vi sM aceani ttse apQointad by the Vireewr of the SM was node up of the following pers". F3 ft ictaon t Amato ectot William a iy - SO 2 lacil sties, Ospt. at 1lssociatsd or wral Centraetaes locat - an Wterl and, 1ui ld inq Official Over PL ArY lbrth Sta r- Daptet , S CSC Ra t i rsd I%re Chief dodo 4NO 410 The of the comi ttme ras to an Optiona iz star to the su u SaD d ing WhJ Ch could be ri thaut . at the 4iscrttLon etf manicipal gvft&,ts, similar to the existing qvw&z let D Mlating to building sec urity. s measure of m1fomity vm10 tt:us b ps inta ined so that Pwrsc m atfsctad could quickly isoertain vto tt,er of mt the aP endi: t lard b adbI by ark 91"m camicipality, so thet strw caul d be eat w.e " Mrs— I M - R acCar llr. hiring this entire deliberative , " to the pmeAmt, ti g= his not pool isW a natIm of Intent to seek outs icSt informs avn In the tutee q i stsr. Itsn. ita t. ; 1 l.10 ill82) r..:i rars as lol ].ars: 11.10 ?7 cr n an agency secs to ObI.a in lnfonus tion or apini ocss In PrePa r irg to Pmt the adcvti cm , aher t, spa ian, ar se a 1 of a rule f rom scu roes outside of the aqej.cy, th a re. she 11 118h not ice of Its act ion in the s to to rn is tst aeda"IT afford all rote res ted per aerie an o ar rtum i ty to awmi t data or views on the rible ct of in writing or wally.Such notice aid eery rti ttan asterial rem i vW by the age cy shall brcneae a ps rt of the he r i g rsrca rd to be W"bre i t tsd to the attar- n y "oral m6er arctian 140160 "is added) Al thous, tree issue of oOcpl Lent with Kinn. stet. 9 11.10 sus not raised during the bearing, It to the sta tu toty i bil i ty of the & a r ing U= Lne r to de - te seine whe t3 mr the h?trcy ba `fv if it lad all ttlem t, 0 tintive aid praoc- dural tequ i r ts of lee Ot rvl• . • /tiers. S tot. 1 91981) . It* MAI rule of bw is that bw.4 1 =2 defecu its liance with proc.vdu ral req u i rraents which do not reflect bid faith undo r aininq the pu rpme of the Orduntand whi do not pre j udioe the ri ghzs of t hcee inbendad to be psc)t ectsd by tt will Wt sef ice to ace r turn mental actlan. Ci tt of lei "-*La;c1 is •. %Urte le . 291 Nee a 3d 386, 391 Qtirn. 1980)o Shis gmeral rile t+ss bean awl led to the rul em.k irq iregt of a&inistra tive agencies utrre the +vwrta M" irad only sins tantial oae pl ianae. "lbte •, 3nc . •. thio state picim omission 122 1t.Z.3d 863, action dised., 230 m.L.2d tss MID 19 St y W no ery •. Chemie , SU P. ;d 131 (Alaska 1972) t 9ndc r sm, Leech i lbroe , inc. t. com eta tc U auor Control soe re STS ?. M 721 Obshhit iregton , IM). ft 40 so W do ftso ft.40 ...4W .40 4W ..` Cbnt. ) C. Clf ntan ardstan, l.s. X chard A. srmAcs Di roc = of bginmeritq lies i s tant ni rector Ckford tzvp<rt ias sui 1 ding Wes i = Div.. at f •el, ticen, Eck 1brr+tr. moral Oaur>.n Wsat11 mi tb Ki recreates Ralti *ow users. ft ilding Off icial . Iles 1bru s. Csterby, nirector • eta is pin Mttslsrl sui ldirq Oodea t i tandar8s •Odt. si vw t SmOridumn 9s t mugM in Pe s t &jp1e rrLWr !ti nr*sota Pi re Chiefs Jlsaac ittien •Code [bnsult mts si ctf itld P%re r tascst Wilding 0 8 i ttend.rds Div, . Prownt Wilding Off ic"I dW ti IF"! Mw wommiMwi Mutt has p•t to apQl y the 'b<t tent sal toQ1 Largos •- twine to de to cu In tra ti ve rW we king 1'ts • 'fie txyrt wea asked to that d=tslre in J*-uex, Brothers _Wolesale Liquor v. k . 195 IRON& 29 238 Mme 1"0) . but ref us~d to do so bwrasise tfirr agney in the t come W qsW in w rulsr procdinp aow rm . Mw overt did not bold tM the fi=trine would nut be sppl lad in an late oboe and its applicability ft rules k i.M P'r`oceed Imp under the Kinimmaats Mministrative atns let has b sR t . Steer , f a, i tz. ;ire %alowk ins In IEirn. uhme 152 , z S CLO79i. 3m this siettet, there is nc a vide'ncs of any bed fai fh on the pert of the lk,,femy In the solicitation of outside cawwits and mle drafting procedure. st1 r. the rtard elms that the IN= esie all rea simuble attempts to all cal of fec and/or graVe to participate in the de 1 ibera tion Al - h the teen iarl raou i its in Ki.M. state t 11.10 war* not lied With by the KM, the of that statuts ha met. Iry is to that r*YTr was pre ice lard by the failure of the 1= to I Sri th the pjbl i - cstf cn requ ireaes:t. .aantly, the %a ring Laninet tins that the IN= has tsrt ially oaePl iad' with the statutory 'scl iei to t i on • requis. M•rents 0 3n the na r mw eitesarrs tsr=w of this =m to nna t ive f lM i ng s or ovncl us i ons will result* I* Al thouP is Statutes do rot a da to the t sm icipai i ties - Aide k fire protection !ar thei eiti sans, U&ny sm icipal ities are W&AVwring to sa inta in a proficient level of f ire protection in the face of sadi tim al con- struction and restricted budgets dut to evt . .ka In resosraet. by prmidij9 for built-in fire trippres s ion m t in nor caonsttvct ion, a raasrnahle deg roe of protection can be tea into irsed ri thaut add i tioml fire sta tlom a o.iining Tow saft pl lee, and recruiting add i tiocal f f n - i9htirr pe: sonnal. MIe s rience of Rcx#es ter, ta, %bich has !mod a 'sprinkler ardinanae• fee tie past 1 S Vwrs shams that asdvanh the papuletion of the city has ircresd by 32, 000 and the has sxps,r1 V 5 an addi tianal foul tgiire riles, the saw twui rewrnts for the fire departsot have been reduced by sic f i.re•f ightets. z Chas is a Olt tesult of ttw raga irerMS t that all row aanstrvction be r oauipprd vitb automatic sprinkler wystsas. 3M addition, avtC=tic sprinkler r vote= have been S to be both life and property saving review in case of j fire. s, the p mist 2 w" 9 1010020 Optional Prvvi morns for U stills- tiara of Cho -ft sites tire suppression dystew # authors acs r aUcipalitLes to s sdcapt, Wi uncut dW" , rsgU irawen for the ins to l l a t sera of au tase t ie ipr inklt r std In mw Colstnwtion M Mt fwth In the !'mil!. In mlt cif ios the f x tYpas of 166 clang with mars boot flW itsmts whiCh will fall ande r I a i tl la 7) , thetitlL3toltifn. dtal• 16 ed sqcial awe l nt to the state Su ild ing 0 t '1 which pe rmi t teed the City of A=Ioms - adop . sprinklernk1et old i n.nce . leeter 5`prcial Novi s for ttw City of Pce*x ter eantai ned in the MC iwwd i ateTY prior to kpendis A. _• Al though do- - el ter is the only wm icipa 1 i ty which has been authorised to f ire code perm is i one d i tferrnt thee the state acme . other tmi cipa 1 i tie• hav* also done, so as part of semi ng r9qul • t ions . Mw validity of thmw tnul at ions is mss - ti"blt. howwor in light of the tequir *?Ito of ltim. state 2 199f.011 119 , bend the Kinnrwt. &Ip mw Ovurt s hol in Ci of Himwtanks •. hark R-* • hr ioc .. M s. 1t S .d 163 tll7 ) i 1- ttw N prinkler• w 6 too 1 faaily awidesms an wet ao nred by this Wit. At hair ing, t1w . V= . two sente,m in the PICV000d rule to etari - ambiguities. the Iast resYbrn t in paragraph C. was w - 0 to tw nd eo907heightaimnsaftspr+oidrd in cations $06 and of the thiform building adc:ptad in the stets building eooae are apps iaablt. • 3h addi- ticn. t+0 lent sentsonCe in paragraph C.11. was tog t Sw i l ding off i - dals, in rr&nm with their fin chiefs, my accept alternate systas which two% f ire rotectioep Capabilities omiealent to system ehit:h ocsply with• stanftrd 31 of Ow Chi form vuilding Ovde. • %e %arirq ft miteriter fi that tfrrse asend rats smrely clarity the intent of tt a rule and on not substantial Cho noes to the rul" as P1 . Several building officials Cont that the prWpostd hula , could ft t f ire Mode requ i rests throughout the state. &Mi tlwwlly, th of - f sdals arVmd that the sowre foot twauiremonts for each of the leg listed are both arbitrary and sac^en i re. truer ents wre svggcstad to licnare tfie scw re foot tow i resents for each oac'vc - ney 9 Wiping. 2e V= contends that this optional siac +rill not frarnt the SBC bresuse if it is aidcpssd try s aanicipsl ity, it lust be adopted in wt ole, thus fr tation Carmot se - mult. S visory ftard • er Patriot a9 tbcol dssistant Chief of the Rich- Ir field public safety tapir t stated teat ouantitstive foreulas which relate the cubic beet of camps r size to gallons of water pet ainute ard Wirer rewireeents were ased to sst,ablish the equate footage reqjireeents. use coy++ wtotions are briefly described in bthibi t S to the Statement of tied ae1d Aeasatitblfness. The Kinresoto State sus lders 1i aaeiation and the xiruaesota wlti -ass - inq Association VWA aced , to tively) both argmd that the safety fv tares pro vi dam by the p& Sul a do rot just the eas for rule iapl wwn- todon. The N paints out that Kirin. atat. 126-13, which tWui res that Nhe mmtruction of buildings should be permtted at the least passible Cost con- s latent with zed star& rds of health aced safety dictates against l%is Propose tolee both the MA and the WW ttirw+e sagested that paragraph C.11, be ever ed by deleting the aquare foot roviremient and asking the prov Lon applicable only to dare! 1 ingt +ritth uni on lout or aoce Man =enact tbsn th re* or more as proposed . lb eh argtiars !hat 00 1, SO0 -equa re 400t raga i rmmt C'mts inad in thw tole is too sestrictivia aM that a deal l inq unit with three loots Carre to distimuished frm a typical one- faecily relcidolcet Oka Vhil tbrlsm frm the arl t=wtic tan so Ion belrti f led that it could cost Ines than "DO to sprinkle a 1 r0D0weo<ert -hoot asps rt am snit. 3h mold! tion, the , tocord chars that insuranim cost bsnef its will accrue !o the owners of '*tinklad' b dIdings. If a fire !saes amr in a soprisklod building, a reduction in the lays of p'c'aperty ami1br possibly We will eo:ult. Wo derivetion of the s*wre- foot tquitments toss beret+ ai about. limila=ly the sprinkler <MOUir cant for "ruwnt boLws t hIA genre welling units on th m or more floors we also a product of tbg equipeeset. volvowr, +ester end and ca"r t sin for wlas. Mr. Wil kin fergrr, testifying on behalf of the Ktrsnesot loeiety of ArdhItacU ted that the term •autartic sprinkler yptws• should be th ! title rather than initial Oft of the term `rice oppression 40 • •o •• go tystes'. the Ctrs, `fire sRW syst,®s•. Mrs udsd in the propmd rule,K - bP to 41110W ftC the lnclusicn of other types of sYstws in t!e rule by my of later me dwnt, salyded by the !Cfl alert , the 1ha rinq bare i ne r finds that the need ftr and ble max of Rife 2 IdM f 1:10020 !mss bren drrc:nstralad by an aft f ZMtirVV presentation of !acts in the trcorde rcausc of the apzioer,l Crtvre of this p a'tssditt !o rte SUC each MmIC4811ty rill ban the t apportunity too Case" the Cost- Weffective, of this Cult its light of its wn ts+eeds. 2f sassiciprl i tiles de tersine hat this rile is too rfstrietive to be berltad, tie am a" be to rec=ss i dt r sore of tfe prav i slam taon to inrd herein. 'mere were mend tints swagWstsd to V* prvposed rule which are teas - onable alternatives, ho wevere W* Bearing laaSiner points out that Mort Writ - ten oaesMel is were twat f wd t=ce fire Chiefs, f ire ea rsha ls, rryors, and fire- fig%ter organisations th t the state Which endorse the rule as promew ar+d poet iti Mawnabler ss as a needed mature !or fire protection and bud - getary taantrol for aunieipal "t 0 issued upon the faL LN ftndiesgs of the ]tearing 2cminer makes Un fol lroering s -- y Cif • 19 'mat the toiLdirq Oode nivisfan 98W proper notice of the hawing in . this utter. 2. 'that 0a SM has fulfilled the DemAu rat twultown of !linn. Stete s 14.1 subds. 1 We 2 aq$2) and all other prooed3ral regtiIrsaents of lay+ or ru1ft. 2. % at the has red its statutory authority to •iaopt the pro- peed tu1 :2, and has fulfilled all other sots tart ive Sego i resents of Um or rule within the Wining of Mints, State pa 14005 •ubde 1. 14015 suhd. 2 Wd 14950 11) and tai) 11962)o S. 'flat the = has desarettratoo Ole eslad fat and re&wablenrss of the • propmwd =vUw by an off iaeative presentation of facts in the tward within the loaning of NLMe lute of 14011 24050 till) a9Z). so Sat the additions Wd aoendvents to the V& rules which were Crated by t!e SM after publ ic*tion of the p Coles its the State Itlq- later do not noUlt in rules Wbich are substantially different free the pro- pored rules as "l ish*d in the state N9 aster within the maning of Minn- tat * s 14 *15t subd e 1 tilt 2) snd ! !t."M is 2.110 A. and 2e 111 (1910 W e) . S. IMt MW pindings Stich night properly be torwrd Qancl us ioc+s and Cary • Cb cl us l ans Stich Might pr rl y be tf no! !'Ltd i nqs are he ray adapted as such* 7. '1hCrt • fksdisq or oonclus i an of trod old rw eanableneas in ma rd to aw particu rule 89WICtim abM Nat pM2Uft and OM20 not diaeeurage the f Sale further rcdification of the rules haled upon on mmination of the I le Cowwnto pcvrided hat no autistantial &AT" is and# lets a* prof = a rules as origirWIly pAbblial and VMV16 d that tht rule finillr adopted is bred sp m Sects app ea rirq its Ole tole Wiring rsaord. _ NoW elan 0a IN tbncl usioess, the D"rinq !miner mtes the M • Sevin t s- L SPRINKLER RE UIRFMENTS • occupancy group 19)9 118C Rants City of Rochester Qer th.38 amendments r 4 Now 1 BOO+ w sta a A -1 M ao 1000 w sta a A-2 L "' 4 300+ A• 2 o 300 A_3 v- + '° N s etc.N &M L. 4 a O C "4" v w ry service state 40 1 c a ra es arm C retai o -2 retail +12COO s stor.of school +12t h i h pil e stor o o . hangar stor 73 OV arm N >N a o 0 3 non com s or ca o 0 X spa r N C thru 12th 50+E - 1 rip V a thru 12th, - 50 E - 2 4 day tare etc E -.3 H O N Ulm$ • r— O L L tsa materials H -c +1500 n f l am l i u i d s H - 2 N +1500 Senerat H 3 - AA s- s. +3000dust. repair garages H- o au a o > over I story 8400 Zone 20200 Zone 3 s repair hangarsA9 H -5 c E a 'v C has nuts hm I -w 6 sv rvd. live I -2 n Jailsmeto1 1 -3 C r s[ C C R? 12/15/82 Appendix E option proposed 1983 Al l a rea s All 00+ occupants AIT areas sere stet 3000+ ara e s 5000+ of f & school 8500+ or 3 st.+ reta & stor 2000+ or 3 st.9 850D+ or 2 st.+ 8500+ or . 2 st.+ All w/ 29 occupants MI M apnrLnentsi R - 1 o + 20200 or 4st Zn 1,2 or 3 st.+ a hotel: N « +30000 Zone 3 ssoo+ mr 9 st.± dwellinas R -3 Tiriv ara es M4 u n s. etc. 'M Attachment nine ORDINANCE N0, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION NINE OF THE MAPLEWOOD CODE RELATING TO SPRINKLERS THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 9-22 of the Maplewood Code is hereby amended to read as follows (additions underlined, deletions crossed out) : Sec. 9 -22. Procedures and administration. As provided by the state building code, the following appendices of the state b u i l d i n g code are hereby adopted by reference: Appendix A - -Fall Out Shelters Appendix B--Variations in Snow Loads 4979 1982 Uniform Building, Code Appendix Chapter 35 Minnesota Plumbing Code Appendix B State Building Code Appendix C-- Abbreviations and Addresses of Technical Origin 4979 1982 Uniform Building Code Chapters 12, 48 49 55 70, Minnesota Plumbing Code -- Appendix C. D State Building Code Flood Proofing Regulations--Section 201.2 through 208.2 Appendix E-- Sprinklers Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after passage and publication. Passed by the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this day of 1983 Mayor Attest: Ayes- - Clerk Nays -- i MEMORANDUM i S TO City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development bl:`::.' ._...._... SUBJECT: Plan Amendment and Rezoning -- Hearing Date k } LOCATION: County Road B and Van Dyke Street DATE: October 24, 19 8 4 The city council, on September 24th, initiated a plan amendment from SC, service commercial and RM, residential medium density to LSC, limited service commercial and rezoning from BC, business commercial and R -3, multiple dwelling to LBC, l business commercial for the corner of flan Dyke Street and County Road B. This was initiated by the council at the request of a neighborhood resident -- Manfred Reichert. The planning commission considered this same request on March 19th. At that time, Castle Design was proposing to build double dwellings on Van Dyke Street and service commercial behind. The neighborhood and property owners agreed that the present zoning was acceptable, (See enclosed planning commission minutes of March 19, 1984.) Staff recommended that the R -3 zone be changed to R -2 to conform to .the developer's plan and provide a more compatible buffer zone between the exist single dwelling and commercial zone. The planning commission recommended that the plan amendment be.denied and that no action be taken on the R -3 rezoning until a plat is brought in by the developer. The .city counc on April 23rd, moved that no changes be made in the Land use designation or zoning. Since that. time, the developer is no longer interested in this property. Recommendation Concur with the planning commission and deny a hearing unless a formal application is submitted. 1 I F GERVAIS tv+ 1A z. L A 04 10C tVE U11 10 041 fA _ V E AVE. I , rIF L4 .`. ON T Q AVE. W N SKILL W4 ME o AVE. _ +tA r _ Rid NR mar ! V ~ ` AOS IWOOD AVE, R Y N L t W W KCWL MAN AVE. . 23 41L.L RD. 65 ' W z AV H to AV f ' v iS7 AVIV S R EN AYE. COPE AVE. ._ N 25 t i 11) •. • a W R PUBLIC WORKS BLS. t DD f z AVE. > Su _ R A ` tISIE AV c R1rLEY wE • W Wo A a fi a /0 PH 1A Z.E G s < t Z i Loh t 2 z _ J sop Z PRI E ` J~ < co W t AV ni ST. PA U 1. 11VE j rpotict s &VE W N L ow LOCATION MAP 10 Attachment 1 4 N vpw dim d=W Co 1 e C\j Af • • 0 7-1 2. ZS J v 7r11U 1" 12-07 P - &op P r1 Ic Ki nderhaus IL sic L A R K 5chwin . - da Maple 1 h e e1 :'.::.. • t•. '.:':: :'. :• ::.- ..x'•••:11• : .•: T'.• _ rte. :I.r!!..r.'.W . :MO ir • \'.S.r. ••III. • ' I. t' ±/.•.'• .:•. • .•.':. LAURIE Furniture R •,..:::::: = - J D :± r ; S - • „• • :.iii Y/ :' Uj do V1 X La 4L PAC. Aol. ODOM S A D H R S T f 75' 1 'ls.C' 44: ;. ...;; :%;;i:•. ` -sc a. 1 4 • c f _ i V i: .ate •. _ •. 2 r •:F. - •'' ~•'•:•: •:ice :::::: ' ••.j.` 11C `' 7 • 1 •.. . •. :;.;+ := : :•'rr . is ! W- j .+ Vol Qice •:ti : ± ' 1 •:j- r: : w ' ::: :•.•:•ti.•:: • ' rGasHut .:.:: :: •' p 3v . is •:; :•' = •:v. •.t . •:::: :+ Ow do Q lit db s PROPER LINE ZONING MAP Attachment 2 i IF map a *- do 40 N , Om-o —4 LA lall minter an jprin al arterial IN I a sC 41aft za r COi AhWOOL.&cmown 49 It L I nwLyMun P i 1. IND Ll L= i3. r OL WAR, 406 Sherwood Clen NEIGNaD. ^.JDOD LAND USE PLAY Attachment 3 I J interchan s R Imn R I 40- Was. No. 4 n A Rezoning--CountyplanAmendmentand Road 8 and VanDykeke Stre y et Secretary Olson read the notice f 'o pu 'c heari The Proposal is toamendtheplanfromSCandRMtoLSCandrezonetheroert S P P y from BC andR - 3 to L6 C, S i s recommending approval of the R -3 zon i n g to R. 2. The Cormi ss i on discussed with Secretary Olson h -y d so the cis rec e v edfromtheneighborhoodregardingthisproposal, access to the site andthedensityoftheproposedR - development, Chairman Axda hl asked if there was anyone present who wished tocommentontheproposa Ken Gerva i s , vice president of Castle Des i gn and Development, hedidnotthinkitwouldbepossibletodevelopacresintocommercialOffices. P ercal o ices. They said they would be willingiing to provide an additional access to the site. There. are sewer easements on what was the old street rights -of -way. Therefore, the devel opment 1 an has to take theeasementsintocon P - consideration, They would come in with a plat for the development of the R -2 area. They would plat with Zero lot 1 i ne . They intend on selling the units, not renting them. '9 e They intend to start development of the residential property this ear. Theyretailspacewillbecondominium. The Commission question if there would be access from VanDykefortheinteriorproperty. The applicant indicated there would not be. 'There w11 be a planting berm to separate the res i denti'a l and commercial. Access to the commercial area will-be from County Road B. Secretary Olson indicated that letters were received from ro ertPPY owners Annie Evanson. He read the letter to the commission. The other letter vas .from Dr. Wayne Evanson, representing Annie, reviewed the history of the property. He was opposed to the rezoning. The reu es ted the z y q e zo ng remain the same. Roger Sacks, Del Realty, they were not aware that the letter from Mfrs. Evanson had reached the commission. The other owners are Mr. Ry leandRi1ike. They all agree that the zoning should remain as it is. The zoning should at least remain as is until Mr. Gerva is presents his finished Qlan.tC) the r . Qtjnri3 _ Manford Rickert, 2172 VanDyke Street, said they have been askinginthepastthatthe120feetalongVanDykebekeptmultipleandthe rest could remain as is. He thought the proposal was acceptable. Chairman Axdahl closed the publ hearing portion of the meeting. Commissioner Fischer lmoved.,.t of anni nQ Commiss recommend the city Councill dery tbe.._p . rouQ plan_ amendment. —- Commissioner El lefson seconded ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl , Garrett, F11 efson, Fischer, Pel 1 i sh, S i gmundi k, Whitcomb S t 1 I Commiss Fis moved the ta cmmission recommend '9.end the c t.Y. uu 1 t e o rezoning action on the P -3 section until a 1 at s brought ,in , b the de v - 9_ _ y eloper. Commissioner E1lefson seconded --Comres /xdahl, Barrett, E11 efson, Fischer, Pel l i sh, Si gmundi k, Whitcomb F. Hearing date -- County Road 6 and vanD y ke Street Commissioner Pell i sh moved the planning commission den hydhearing date on this matter, based on the staff report that the previous action indicated the planning commission recommended the plan amendment be denied, no action k on h R— be taken the 3 rezoningng until a plat i s brought i n by the developer. There beingg no plat to consider, the commission sees no reason to rehear the matter. This has been heard on numerous occasions under numerous proposals' Commissioner Sl etten seconded Ayes--Commissioners Axdahl.Whitcomb, Sl etten, S gmundi k, Pel l i sh, Fischer. Larson Ej MEMORANDUM b TO: City Manager t FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Building Permi DATE: October 24., 1984 li " 1 Re ectEt Request ra }e_:__. Council requested that staff consider exempting certain types or value of construction from a building permit. Reason for the Request This -came up when Mr. Todd, at 2800 White Bear Avenue, was required to get a building permit for the replacement of his doors and windows. Council was concerned that requiring a permit for minor construction is unnecessary and discourages homeowners from improving their . property because it may ra i.se their taxes, Comments The building code requires a permit for "the construction, alteration, moving, demolition, repair and use of any building or structure within the municipality, except work located primarily in a public way, public utility towers and poles, mechanical equipment not specifically regulated by the code, and hydraulic flood control structures" (2 MCAR 1.10201). A permit is not required for nonstructural maintenance, such as replacing doors or windows, A permit was required of Mr. Todd because he made structural changes in his windows -- changing sizes and bay windows on the front.. The valuation was $5,000. The specific exemptions allowed by the building code are listed in attachment two from the city attorney. The city cannot allow any other exemptions. While some cities are allowing exemptions under a minimal dollar valuation, this is not allowed by the building code. The building code does allow the city to vary its permit fees. We should omit fees for permits that do not need inspections. Recommendation I. . Take no action in regard to exempting types of construction from a permit, on the basis that: 1. The city is obligated. to enforce the building code without modification. Allowing an illegal exemption may create liability for the city and defeats the purpose of having a uniform ,code. 2. Exempting a minimal dollar valuation may allow struc- tural changes to be made, even though minor, that should be inspected. 3. Repair and minor remodeling will generally not effect property taxes. 4. Permit fees for minor construction are minimal. 5. A permit allows us to make sure the contractor is licensed. This is a protection for the homeowner. II Revise the fee schedule to exempt a permit fee for the first or second layer of s h i n g l e s , trim and siding, on the basis that the city does not make inspections for this work and, therefore, a fee is' not justif ied . 3w Attachments 1. Survey 2. Attorney's opinion 2 BACKGROUND Effect on Taxes Greg Bonrothkurch, of the Ramsey County Assessor's office, stated that the assessed value of a house is not increased for maintenance improvements and generally not increased for remodeling under $1,000 in value. Improvements over $1,000 would not effect the assessed valuation if the improvement did not increase the sales value. As an example, if a $5,000 improvement were made that did not increase the sales value of the house, the assessed value would not change. Likewise, if a $5,000 improvement resulted in an increase in the sales value 'of $3,000, the assessed valuation would increase by $3,0000 Other Cities Enclosed is a survey of cities closest. to us in population and those adjacent to us (attachment one). Over half of the cities closest to us in population do not exempt any construction from a building permit. The rest exempt construction under a minimal dollar valuation, ranging from $100 in Fridley to $1500 in Woodbury. Legal Considerations Attachment two is a legal opinion from the city attorney l i s t i n g the exemptions allowed under the building code and stating that "the city has the obligation to enforce the state building code without digressing or attempted modifications." Permit Fees Valuation Permit Fee 1 - $500 10 500 - $2000 $10 for the first $500 in valuation, plus $1.50 for each additional $100 in valuation 2,001 - $25,000 $32.50 for the first $2,000 in valuation, plus $6 for each additional 1,000 Current Policies We follow the building code in requiring a building permit for all construction, unless exempted by the code. We, however, do not make inspections for the first or second layer of shingles, trim and siding. 3 SURVEY: Do you exempt any type or valuation of construction from having to get a building permit, other than exemptions allowed bythebuilding.code? Metropolitan Cities Closest to Maplewood in Population Coon. Rapids No Under $500 and not structural, unless it effects a ro ert linePPY , such as a fence or driveway. Burnsville No, unless nonstructural, such as a garage door replacement Plymouth No Brooklyn Center No Fridley Under $100 Blaine No Crystal No New Brighton No New Hope Minor replacement or repair is exempt. No specific policy Golden Va 11 ey Under $500 White Bear Lake Under $300 Apple Valley No 4 Attachment 1 South St. Pau 1 G No Eagan Under $500 Maple Grove No Columbia Heights No Cottage Grove No West St. Paul No Shoreview Under $150 Cities Adjacent to Maplewood White Bear Lake Under $300 North St. Pau 1 e Under $300 Oakdale Under $350 Woodbury Under $1500 Newport No, except reshingling Roseville Under $500 and not structural, unless it effects a property line, such as a fence or driveway 5 r 3 Little Canada Any construction under 120 square feet. No dollar valuation exemption Vadnais Heights Under $500 St. Paul No 6 LAIS, BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 5TH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 DONALD L. LAiS JOHN F. BANNIGAN. JR. PATRICK J. KELLY September 21, 1984 Barry Evans City Manager 1380 Frost Avenue. Maplewood MN 55109 RE: Maplewood Permits Our File No, 5282 AREA CODE 612 224-3781 Dear Mr. Evans: Th i s 1 etter i s i n reference to vari ous ques ti ons ra i sed by the City Council during the meeting of September 10, 19840 I. Purpose of the Building Cade The State of Minnesota has adopted the Minnesota State Building Code the purpose of this code is to provide uniform standards to safeguard l i f e or limb, health, property and public welfare by regulating, control i ng design, construction, quality m a t e r i a l s , use and occupancies of all buildings and structures. State Building Code shall apply state wide and supersede the Building Code of any municipality, The terms "must" and "shall" have the same meaning in both mandatory terms. I I . . Scope Specifically the provi s i ons of the Minnesota State Building Code shall apply to the construction, alteration, moving, demolition, repair and use of any building or structure within the municipality, except work located rimaril in a publicPyP way, public utility towers and poles, mechanical equipment not specifically regulated by the code, and hydraulic flood control structures. (2 MCAR § 1.10201) 7 Attachment 2 Mr. Barry Evans September 21 1984 Page 2 The Code states that additions, alterations, repairs and changes of use or occupancy in all buildings and structures shall comply with the provisions for new buildings and structures, III. Exceptions The following appendices, annexes and supplemental material 1 i sted i n the Code shal 1 not be mandtory but may be adopted without change at the di scret of any muni cipal i ty, except UBC Appendix Chapter 70 may be adopted with revised fee and bond requi rements. 1 . Minnesota State Bui l.ding Code. Appendix "C" abbreviations and addresses of Technical Organizations. 2. 1979 UBC Appendix, Chapters 12, 38, 48, 49, 55 and70. UBC appendices not listed as mandatory or optional are n incorporated 'in the State Building Code 3. Minneso Plumbing Code Appendices C and D. 4. Flood Proofing Regulations, Section 201.2 through 208.2 5. Minnesota State Bui di ng Code Appendix "D",' Building Security Sections 4101-41 b. optional Appendix "E" Automatic Fire Suppression Systems, IV. PERMITS AND INSPECTION Municipalities are governed by S 301(A) Permi Required. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or cor oration to erect, construct, enl ar e alter re air, move im rove, remove, convert or demo ish an bui l di n or structure regulated bar this Code or cause the same to be done without first obtaining a separate permit for each building or structure from the building official, Permi t esegul ated by UBC Sect- ion a) . 1Jfi4c- s'Ta'tes ea 'C`F"'`municipl.t,m.ust. : opt its own schedule of permit jfe. The fee schedule of Tale 3 -A is optional for use by a local authority as a recommended schedule. In areas outside the enforcement authority of the City, the fee charge for issuance of permits for single family dwellings may not exceed the greater of $100.00 or .005 times the valuestructuread of theadditionoralteration. The determination of the v •al ue or eva1 uati on under anyoftheprovisiofthisCodemustb offi be made y thebuiicial. The work to be used Inthebuildinermitandbuildinfees •1 an reviewthetotalvalueofallconstructionworkf h thepermitisissuedaswellas or which all fi •shed work, antin ,roofing electrical , plumb head n • elevato , air condtionin , s, fire e uishing systems and other erman r - Permanentequipm ----ent V. Ii4VESTIGATION FEES: Investigation fees are governed by Section 304(d) includingworkwithoutapermit. Whenever any work for which a ermi t i s rethebu p requiredbyuldingcodehasbeencommenced without first obtaining said permit, 'p t, a specialinvestigationgationshallbemadebeforepermitmaybeissuedforsuchwork, y FEE. An investigation fee, in addition t • t feeshallbecollectedwhetherornotaltheperms permit i sp then orsubseqissued. The investigationgation fee shall be .equal to the amount of the permit fee re i red bTheminimumiq y this code. investigatioon. fee shall be the same as theminimumfeesetforthinTableNo. 3 -A The paymentofsuchinvestigationfeeshallnotexempanypersonfromwithallotherrovisionsof 'p this codenorfromanypenaltyprescribedbylaw. VI - WORK 0R CONSTRUCTIONCTION DOESr _R11—A _BUILDING FEE. Section 301 (b) details the items that do not require abuildingpermitspecifca1ly, 1 . One -story detached accessory ui 1 din syg used as toolandstoragesheds, playhouses and similar uses ro'ected providedtheproofareadoesnotexceed120squarefeet. 2. Fences not over b feet high. 3. Oil derricks. 4. Movable cases, counters and partitions not over 5 feet high. r Mr. Burry Evans S 21, 1984 Page 4 ' Retai ni ng. wal 1 s which are not over 4 feet i n' hei htfromthebottom9 of the footing i:o the top of the wall,unless supporting a surcharge or impounding flammable liquids. 6. Water tank supported di re•ctly upon grade if the capacityPtydoesnotexceed5000gallonsandtheratiooftheheht to diameter or width g does not exceed two to one, 7. Platforms, wal and driveways not more than 30 inches above the grade and not over any basement or stor y below. 80 Painting, papering and similar finish work, 9. Temporary motion picture television and theater stagesetsandscenery. 10. Window awnings supported by an exterior wall of Group R,Division 3, and Group M Occupancies when Jro 'ecti n not more than 54 inches'. ' P 9 11. Prefabricated swimming pools accessory rPytoaGroupR,Division 3 Occupancy in which the pool walls are entirelyscentr yabovetheadjacentgradeandifthecapacitydoesnot exceed 5000 gallons. It shoul be pointed out exemption from the ermi t requirementPoftheStateBuild* Code shall not be deemed to authorization for any work to be done in any manner in violati of the rovisions of this code or any other laws or ordinances of thisj VII. POWERS AND DUTIES OF BUILDING OFFICIAL Section 202 (a) states the building official is here b authorized and. d' ydirectedtoenforceal1theprovisions of the building code. For such • ur oses h h 1ppesa l have the powersofalawenforcementofficer. Section 202(d) states that whenever work is being done contrary to the provisions of this code, the b u i l d i n g official may order the work stopped by notice in writing ervedon any persons engaged in doi or causing such work to be done and any such persons shall forthwith stop such work until authorized by the building official to roceed with thee work. Any type of violation is governed by Section 205 • Section 205 states it shall be unlawful of any person, firm or :cor P oration Mr. Barry Evans September 21, 1964 Page 5 to erect, construct, enlarge, . alter, repair, move, improve remove, convert or demolish, equip, use, occupy or mai.ntai n any building or structure or cause or P ermi t the same to be done in violas ton of this code. VIII. MODIFICATIONS... In Section 106 allows the building official to grant modifications in for individual cases . S p eci fica1 1 when there are practi cal di f i cul ti es i nvol ved i n carrying out the provisions of the building code, the building official may grant modifications for individual cases, provided he shall first find a special and valid reason that makes a strict letter of the building code lnpracti cal and that the modification is in conformity with the intent and purpose of the code , and that such modification . does not lessen any fire protection req'i:rements or an y degreeree of structural integrity. The details of any action granti ng modi f cati ons s be recorded and entered i n the files of the code enforcement agency. IX. NON PERMIT WORK- BUILDING OFFICIAL Pursuant to my conversation with the state bui 1 di nQ official, the only work that does not require a permit is spelled out in Section 301(b), The city building official does, have some discretion with respect to inter.pertati on or modification of the code as pointed out in Section 106. One of the i nterpertati ons is with respect to permits required, specifically, whether or not the work is classified as repair work or mai ntance. Mai ntance on a roof would entail replacing a number of shingles, Haintance on windows would entail replacing a window but not modifying size or additional placement of headers. The city has the obligation to enforce the State Building Code without digressing or attempted modifications, Respectfully submitted, L S. BANtJIGAJ & KELLY, P.A. Patrick J Kelly PJK /pkg C: Geoff Olson Acton. by iC:.iiv1 MEMORANDUM Endorsnd Re e%cted TO: Ci Manager Date FROM: Public Works Director SUBJECT: East Mississippi Watershed Management ,Organization DATE: November 1, 1984 The Watershed Management Organization (WMO) in the southern part of town has been proceeding through the approval process. The State has requested some changes in the original proposal. 1. .Change the name to the East Mississippi WMO 2. Accept the existing boundary of the Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District as the north boundary of the new WMO 3. Accept the existing boundary of the Cottage Grove Ravine Water— shed District as the east boundary of the new WMO These changes to the original council approved agreement are of little consequence and are therefore recommended for approval. It should also be Hated that the city council should designate two individuals to serve as members of the WMO Board. QM wonnsEY counrrr RAMSEY COUNTY PARKS& RECREAT D 1850 White Bear Avenue Telephone (612) 777 -1361 St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 Anthony J. Crea, Director Bernard L. Edmonds, Asst. Director October 31, 1984 Mr. Barry Evans Ci Manager City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Re: P.A.C. Charge Dear Mr. Evans: Action by G otz?ic i Endorsod M JLfi e .. Re j ected.__ La.t e Ramsey County is now in the process of soliciting bids for the construction of new Maintenance Shop facilities to be located at the Ramsey County fair ground site near Goodrich Golf Course in the City of Maplewood. I have been advised by Mr. Brad Lemberg of the consulting engineering firm of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlick and Associates, Inc. that in addition to SAC and WAC charges there also would be PAC charges. In view of the contribution that Ramsey County is now . ma . king to the public by providing - four County owned parr sites to, the City for municipal recreational purposes, I respectfully request that the P.A.C. charge for our maintenance shop be waived. Will you please bring this matter before the Maplewood City Council for their concurrence. Your assistance in this matter will be appreciated. Sincerely, A.nt ony J. Crea Director AJC: j jh action by council: JOSEPH COMPANY fEAt701i5 Endorsed.______ 111 odifie4.,._ Rejected_ Date 5001 NORTH UNIVERSITY STREET / PEORIA, ILLINOIS 61614 / TELEPHONE 3091692 -1135 October 15 1984 Mr, Barry Evans City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Ave. Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr . Evans: The Joseph. Company has been endeavoring to develop a new shopping cen- ter of approximately 130,000 square feet on 15.24 acres of land located on Beam and Southlawn Drive, Maplewood, Minnesota. This property is currently owned by Homart Development Co,, and we are in the process of executing a contract to purchase. We have recently been informed by Homart that the City of Maplewood has passed certain resolut ions pertaining to the extension of Southlawn Drive, which at this time, will adversely effect our planned develop - ment causing the elimination of one or two of our prime tenants. In order to offset the above adversity, we inquired of Attorney Mary Ippell, as to whether any financial assistance is available from the City of Maplewood to assist economic development within the City of Maplewood. She had mentioned tax increment financing as a potential although she understood it had never been used in Maplewood. Therefore, the purpose of this letter is to inquire and request of the City of Maplewood their 'consideration of proposing our site as a tax increment district in assisting us in purchas ing this ground from Homart The approximate purchase price being proposed at this time is $2,325,000. Mary Ippell indicated that a payback period of approximately eight years would be most likely as versus a long term bond issue. Either the eight year period or any term longer than eight years would be greatly appre- ciated. In that the bond issue would be below current market rates for shopping center f inancing, we would deeply appreciate you giving this matter UNIVERSITY SQUARE WARDCLIFFE PLAZA FONDULAC PLAZA PEORIA PEORIA EAST PEORIA BARTONVILLE SQUARE BARTONVILLE r MEMORANDUM Action by Counvil: Endorse TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Devel opment red SUBJECT: Planning Commission Resignation Sate DATE: November 1, 1984 Enclosed is a letter of resignation from Joe Pel l i sh and a resolution of appreciation, 1. Approve the resolution and have it made up into a plaque to be presented at a future planning commission meeting. 2. Authorize staff to advertise for a new commissioner. jC Enclosures: 1. Letter of resignation 2. Resolution October 17, 1984 Mayor John Greavu City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 Dear John: The Director of Co=unity Development has advised me that my current appointment to the Maplewood Planning Commission Will expire at the end of 1984. I will not seek reappointment to the Planning Com.mi ssion. I was originally appointed in February of 1976 and after approximately nine years of service I feed that I have personally fulfilled my goal of participation in the growth and development of the City of Maplewood. The purpose of my notification at this time is to allow for adequate time to interview and select a replacement for the Commission. It has been my personal pleasure to have served with, Chairman Axdahl and all the other dedicated members of the Planning Commission throughout this period, incer y yours, Joseph M. Pellish cc: Councilpersons: Norman Anderson Gary Bastian Marylee Maida Michael Wasiluk Les Axdah 1 Geoff Olson JP21 J07NT RESOLUT70N of APPREC7AT70N WHEREAS, Joseph Pettis haz been a mwbeA o j the PtanniNLg Cormniss ion of Mlapt Minn z ince Febtua -ty 26, 1974 and has a e/tved jaith in that capacity to the pnu en t .time; and LIHEREAS, the ptanning commizz ion necogi hugs expvsi cadmA -hip and good judgmemt; and WHEREAS, he hays Jtecty given o j his time and eneng y, with- out eompews ation, ion the be tte meat o j the City o j Maptewood; and L"f EREAS he hays z hown z incene dedication to Uz dutiez. and has conziztentLy 'eontu:bued his t cadeu hip, time and e' jotr t JoA the benefit the city, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBV RESOLVED Jon and on behatj o j the City o j Maptu000d, Minnesota, and its ci i zeivs, that Joseph Pe,,Qtiz h .us hc.eb y extended oun hear t et t gt. " e and apprtecia- tion ion his dedicated z env,ice and we wish hum continued zuecezz in the jutiae. Pazz ed by the council o' the Cit o j Maptexo thins da o 6 , 19840 Jon C. GrLeavu, Ma yon Pa.beed by the F,Canu.ng Commi.aa.on vj the City oj Map.e.ewovd this 5th day aj Nvvembeh, 19 Luteh AxdaU , , C uutunan P.ealzi.ng Comm.i.6bio1 Attest: Luciae E. wceP.i.ua, Cteh ACO-tion councl •To: M John Greavu Maplewood Cit Council From: William Mikiska Mod Re ectetd.__._____ Subject: Civil Service Commission Resi DP III Date: October 16, 1984 As most of you know, I am emplo with 3M Compan Electronic Products Division, This is one of the two 3M divisions which have been chosen to move to Austin, Texas, on Februar 1. 1985o I have been asked to relocate with the division and have decided to accept, As a result of these decisions, I will be forced to resi from the Police Civil Service Cotin ission effective Januar 1, 1985* Durin the years of m service on the commission, I have gained a deeper respect for the Public Safet Uepartment and the people who make it work. Recent years have. seen great chan in the department, and I feel privile to have been a part of this evolution. I am certain that the Maplewood Police Department is now, and will continue' to be, a source of pride for the entire communit I would like to thank you,, Mr. Ma and the Cit Council for allowin me 'to participate on the Conniission. I hope I have proven worth of the challen Thank you, a for the confidence you have shown in me over the years. I must bid you farewell for now, but I will be returnin to Maplewood in the future, Respectfull L 1 E William, F. Mikiska cc: J. Griemann Do Weida Ko Collins - Div. of Publ-i c Safet B. Evans - Cit Manayer 1- %')- October 16, 1984 Maplewood City Council 1780 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 Action by Council: Endorse -- Modifie Rejected...... Date Council Members: I have decided to resign from the Park and Recreation Commission. I sincerely appreciate the opportunity that you have given me to help the Council , the City Manager and the Director of Community Services develop our parks and recreati programs* I feel that Bob Odegard has made an improved contribution toward developing our parks since last spring. I would like to make three recommendations that should help him continue to improve in the eyes of the Park and Recreation Commission First of all, I believe the Director of Community Services should develop an action plan for his major activities, have it approved by the City Manager and the Park and ,Recreation Commission, and then execute the plan. When we simply work from day to day, we will never know if we have reached our goal. I am not suggesting that Bob works without a plan, but we all need goals, approval of the goa by the people that we support tin this case, the City Manager and the P & R Commission - Maplewood citizens) and a yardstick to measure our progress toward implementing those goals. The feeling of self -worth and pride in our work is also a by- product of this process. I think that this should be a six -month plan to accomodate a park construction season and a season of preparation for the next construction season i.e., ordering playground equipment, searching for new park land, etc.) and I definitely feel that the Park & Recreation Commission should participate in developing the plan. Secondly, I feel that the Director of Community Services should submit a status report to the City Manager and the P & R. Commission monthly. This report should indicate progress against each item on the current six -month plan* J Finally, I believe that Park and Recreation Commission meetings have run much more efficiently when the City Manager is present. I, therefore, recommend his presence. for the entire portion of all Commission meetings for one year. Barry is more knowledgable than the Director, or the Commission with respect to city policies, procedures and methods, and has been successful in removing roadblocks and bureaucratic red tape when he has been present at our meetings. Thank you, again, for the opportunity to serve on the Park and Recreation Commission. Sincere Y-1 l t Dean E. Sherburne 1478 Marnie Street Beautiful Maplewood, Minnesota 55119 STATE OF UJUV LS J Vla% DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES BOX CENTENNIAL OFFICE BUILDING • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA • 55155 DNR INFORMATION 612) 246 -6157 FILE NO. 10-0ctober -1984 Action by * " _ ^ _4 V 1 Mr. Barry Evans , City Manager 1380 Frost Avenue Endorse Map 1 e w o o d, MN 55109 fro dJ T^ e d....._.._._.._..__ ReJ ected_...._ Dear Mr. Evans: Date Greetings from the Natural Heritage Program. Enclosed is the information on. the Natural Heritage Register which we spoke about in our recent phone conversation. The Minnesota Natural Heritage Register is d2si fined to recognize tracts of public land which contain natural features of state- wide ecological significance. It is our desire to honor the agencies and individuals who manage these tracts in order to protect and perpetuate the features of concern. The brochure should be especially informative as it provides a more detailed overview of the scope and intent of our project In additi we have encl os a package of informati about the area that we are .proposing for the Natural Heritage Register. It includes a map of the area proposed to be included on the Register, as well as a project evaluation sheet noting the ecological significance of the site. Also attached is a copy of the preliminary draft of the proposed Memorandum of Understanding, to be reviewed, possibly revised, or--if all is in order and the proposal is favorable to you -- signed and returned to our office for the remaini signatures. We would mail the original back and keep a copy on fi le in our Register. Please give careful consideration to our proposal. The Memorandum of Understanding is not legally binding, it is simply an attempt to coordinate our efforts to protect and perpetuate Minnesota's natural diversity with your management plans. I will be in contact with you again within two weeks. If you have any questions before that time, please feel free to call me at 612) 296 -97820 Thank you for your time and consideration. y w ' Ls", pi ',. ` , Y , N '+'`1Y c l Cter °{Qg,e t'iYJ o mac v 3 S, Sincerely yours, Wendi S. Pennings Staff Biologist AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER O MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING for inclusion of portions of James McKee Prairie, City of Maplewood on the Minnesota Natural Heritage Register Lands selected for inclusion on the Minnesota Natural Heritage Register are representative of Minnesota's original landscape, and contain outstanding ecological features such as unique plant communities, rare plant and animal species, and significant geo- • logical sites. Many of Minnesota's finest natural areas occur on public lands. The Minnesota Natural Heritage Register recognizes tracts of public land that contain natural features of statewide ecological significance and honors those agencies and individuals that manage these lands to protect and perpetuate the features of interest. Through careful management_ of these lands it is possible to preserve and protect a cross section of the rich natural diver= sty of Minnesota. The intent of this - memorandum is to promote voluntary cooperation between the City of Map."'Lewood and the Minnesota Natural Heritage Program for the purpose of recognizing the statewide significance of the area known as James McKee Prairie and to insure its perpetu -- ation through appropriate management actions. Through this agree-m- ment the City of Maplewood agrees to accord James McKee Prairie recognition as a prairie of statewide significance and, to the best of the city's ability, to manage the site in a consistent manner. This memorandum describes those ecologically significant features that occur within the boundaries of Names McKee Prairie. A map showing the location of the features and any other information on the occurrences is attached. Included are comments on the appro -- priate management of the features and surrounding land to insure the perpetuation of the features. Natural Features of Interest . James McKee Prairie is a remnant of the black -soil prairie that was originally distributed throughout central Minnesota. Although James McKee Prairie is small (only 3 acres) , it harbors over 150 species of native plants. s'wo of these species are of special interest, Prairie White Fringed Orchid ( Platanthera flava) and Cowbane ( Oxypolis r1gidior . Today only fragments of native prairie remain in this part of the state; this plant community type is considered threatened by the Natural Heritage Program. The plant species Platanthera flava is a state endangered species, and while oxypolis_ ri idior has no official designation, it too is considered a species of special inter- est by the Natural Heritage Program, The Natural Heritage Program considers James McKee Prairie a signif- 10ant natural area and recommends its preservation. Currently there are only 11 prairies remaining in east central Minnesota that are of natural area quality and they total only 324 acres. The natural quality of this site is impressive. The native prairie community appears intact with no evidence of- depredation due to grazing, plowing, or mowing. The proximity of James McKee Prairie.. to the Twin Cities further enhances its value for preservation as an area for educational use. Thus, the Natural Heritage Program,! urges the Preservation of James McKee cPrairieasarepresentativetract of original landscape, as the native soil of two notable lant s eciespp landasavaluableeducationalarea Management Guidelines Both historically and currently the occurrence of fire plays an important role in maintaining prairie community composition In the absence of fire, woody plants increase in abundance and may eventually convert prairie to shrub or forest land . Burning also releases nutrients previously bound in old, dead vegetation. The release of these nutrients is noticeable by the increased growth and vigor of the prairie plants following fire. In view of the role of fire in maintaining the integrity of prairie plant commun- ities, it is important to attempt to design a fire management planforJamesMcKeePrairie, This plan needs to consider the feasibilityofburningtheprairieaswellasthefrequencyandtimingappropriateforthearea. _ Because of the small size of James McKee Prairie, it might be nec- essary to implement other control techniques to limit the spread of woody vegetation., particularly aspen. Manually cutting saplingsandselectivelytreatingstumpswith, an herbicide may be advisable at some point in time. In keeping with the natural area quality of James McKee Prairie, the introduction or removal of plant or animal species will be prohibited without careful review by city officials and consultation with the Natural Heritage Program. Such actions can reduce the scientific value of the prairie by artificially extending istribution of intro - duce g d plants and reducing' former plant populations to the point where they are no longer viable. Other management considerations include the designation of a buffer area around James McKee Prairie. A buffer will minimize the impacts of adjacent land use upon the prairie and also will allow for the opportunity for limited expansion of the prairie. The small size of James McKee Prairie limits the amount and degree of public use that can be accommodated without harmful effects on the vegetation or soils. For this reason, the Natural Heritage Program will not include the specific location of James McKee Prairie in any of their published materials. Interested people will be asked to contact the appropriate managing agency within the City Maplewood* of Summa To Provide the opportunity to comment on possible impact of the proposed management activities on the natural features of interest, the city manager or appropriate managing agency will inform the Natural Heritage Program of proposed developments or actions relating to James McKee Prairie This agreement does not change the existing authority or management responsibility of the City of Maplewood with respect to James McKee Prairie, Cooperation between the City of Maplewood and the Natural Heritage Program to protect and enhance James McKee Prairie is based on the mutual recognition of its importance and public value. Bob Odegard, Director rbara Co f n, Coordinator Parks and Recreation !Utural He age Program ID o g Date D to Barry Evans , City Manager Rogef Holmes, Chief City of Maplewood Section of Wildlife Date tfao * /f -& Date x -r t % % t) I. . \ \ ' \ ` . it • r d i ' ;. \ l J 1 ti. `•, 4b DD A4r s ',µ ms. a ,' \ w ' x lob C co Lit co X 9 x to Q ` r t'` 3 o 10A - o a \. x b , x j to CD \\ K to m c m t x tv c ' . I • • \ ' • V i ` r ` \L' kcJLl Arm- x \ Ixt S , ol 1 , . mob ' 1 , 1. •. • 1 , f `. 11' •/ fly` _ /. ...,• ' kTH rN• • ••.••• ••••••• 1 r ,•. • ... .. HO' OLpWAY- AVE . \ . . 3 .. - Z Q R all L If i o Tahk • 1 ` :.i• ; 1 -- %_ `_ _ ' , ,;. Hi . L.6v- _ - ( N2krZchb hop aturrar r ' _-. - Q /':`! ,;•_ _ = f rt ` f 1 Sch 4 RP 7EU3 1!/ -R VE - s — t ' „ - V / •. 0 r 0 oil -ON 1 + • - ,.... . , CJ yy •:_ -'- •• -. TES ,, .. i' •:- • ;_ •. -. ;- ' pew 111 'ti • Q X033 NJ Owto j pe) 1 1 / •, t• III / • r ./"'../%• . i \ • •_ • $ ` ` ' 1 ` { ` { • l All l.- r`r /!' - . f % _'r' ( • \: s nl` '!" _ ' OG , t 1 \ R 105L' l.• If ji M r r' + = / or Will r de604W. * , . , _. 4 - 1 IL O t 0 ... f' • • ' l 831 1 • _ .. ,5 .• r 1077 " -- ..; =• / ;, . + lb • ; i • i dam tom... r \ 1 • • • t 1 O a 1 t j 0 6 ' • 10 -- 00 a . 7 .O i ( `fI . ' ( • . • S . 1 ": . f -. /ate:' O t r or a IfAl ell o Midvale.lor ... • • . • • • . • . Ea j . Pew 106 Ow 25 w — I0 7 • BR lQg. • .... • VLj Geth. ma . .•• - " •• • Scher' . .. r . \ ..— -. . 0 M O i -.••/ \ _ Vl 10 I 21 •: a. `. ,f ' •• •' V • i i` 1 C ' .w1i' -• ,,; •• • •'• G i R : a y r r ..• `^J _ .. - ••: ,:..••..• / / - // mot j Ot Un0' 140 Ol MI/1NrN4 •• _—k L Ar •. % a t • - Q E rq E, - r • E i cc ull r Z Q s . 1 S .. • 1 Status Report 1 Scientificfic Name. Platanthera (lava (Le)Spreng Family: Orchidaceae Common Name: Tubercled Rein - orchid State Status: Endangered Federal Status: Previously considered by the Department of Interior for listing as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Public.Law 93 7245, enacted December 28 1973). Not currently being considered for listing. Basis for Minnesota Status: In spite of intensive field searches, this species has been documented only twice in Minnesota since 1909. This lack of recent records appears to indicate a precipitous decline in populations. This decline is likely the result of habitat loss associated with the expanding residential, agricultural and commercial activities in east- central Minnesota. The population occurring in Maplewood is the largest of the two surviving populations and has the best chance for long -term survival. This site offers an excellent opportunity (perhaps the last opportunity) to preserve the rare orchid in its natural habitat.. Preferred Habitat in Minnesota: This species prefers Taoist P rairies and native meadows. It has been recorded only from high - quality natural areas, and appears unable to tolerate disturbances in its habitat. James McKee Prairie in Maplewood provides an ideal habitat for this species. Management Recommendations: The population of this species at James McKee Prairie should benefit from a prescribed burn regime. Dormant season burns will help maintain the habitat and reduce competition from invading shrubs. Management must also consider the attraction of the general public to orchids, especially very rare orchids. The orchid population is quite small and could be adversely affected by increased foot traffic in the area (trampling). A more serious problem: is the possibility of plants being illegally removed by orchid fanciers. This has severely degraded other sites of rare orchids across the country and should be guarded against. As a general precaution, the presence and location of the orchids should not be made public knowledge. The tremendous research opportunities offered by this rare species and its pristine habitat will attract scientists and naturalists, but their activities should be restricted if there is a perceived threat from "over -use" of the resource. A systematic monitoring program could be initiated with the goal of predicting further management needs for this species. Status Report Scientific Name: Oxypolis rigidior Family: Apiaceae Common Name: Cowbane State Status: watch category Federal Status: None Basis for Minnesota Status: This species is currently •y nown from approximately20locationsinMinnesota. All are confined to a vulnerable habitat type in southeastern Minnesota. The only population currently known to occur north of the Minnesota River is found at James McKee Prairie inMaplewood. This species is expected to suffer a si g nificant decline throughout its Minnesota range within the next decade. The cause of the decline will be loss of its native habitat to agricultural and urban expansion. The DNR is concerned that this loss of habitat could result in oe rigidior being confined to isolated remnant habitats which could threaten its survival in Minnesota, Preferred.Habitat in Minnesota: This species ocdurs in moist rairiesP ,native meadows and calcareous fens. It has been shown to tolerate certain forms of light disturbance (livestock will not eat it),but any change in groundwater level, disturbance of the soil surface or cncroachment of competing shrubs will so alter its habitat to threaten its survival. Management Recommendations: The population of this species at'James McKee Prairie has apparently increased in recent ears presumably inYqpy response to dormant season fires. Such prescribed burns should be very effective in maintaining a healthy population of this species.Under a well - conceived fire regime, 09 rigidior should have no difficulty perpetuating itself at this site. b r NATURAL HERITAGE P ROG R ILM PROJECT EVALUATION Jim's Prairie COUNTY: Ramse Southern Oak Barrens DNR QUAD CODE: S18b LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ' T29N R2211 NW NW, SE4 Sec 24 Iwwwwwwww. PRESENT STATUS: Recommended re istered area (Natural Heritage Program) APPROX . ' ACREAGE : 3 OWNERSHIP: City of Ma lewood w wr A r www .Iw. . wow. ww ww w wr. i w .. . ww www wfw. .. r. w . ww r wwr r wr ww . r .. war. r . r ...wr .wwr . w! www www iw NAME OF PROJECT: LANDSCAPE REGION: ECOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF PROJECT AREA Jim's Prairie is a small but fine example of wet -mesic to wet black -soil prairie. in the presettlement landscape, black -soil prairies in E. central Minnesota occurred in patches in a matrix of oak savanna, and deciduous forest. Historically the frequency of fires played a significant role in determining the and distribut of plant community types here. Oak savanna and maple - basswood ("Big Woods ") were the dominant vegetation types. Much of the black -soil prairie was restricted to the deep soils on the nearly level outwash plains and terraces. Today, only a few fragments of native prairie remain in E.C. Minnesota. The Natural, Heritage Program considers the E.C. black -soil prairie to be a threat - ened plant community in Minnesota. Remaining examples of these prairies are given high priority for preservation. Jim's Prairie is a 3. acre level tract of native prairie on silt loan soils surrounded by irregularly sloping morainic hills. The prairie is bordered on the east by an esker, portions of which are colonized by bur oaks. Although Jim's Prairie is only 3 acres, it contains over 150 species of .native plants. The prairie community appears intact and there is no evidence of degradation due to plowing, grazing, or mowing. A native prairie plant of state -vvi de concern, cowbane . ( Oxypolis rigidior , is found here, and is the only known occurrence for Ramsey County. Jim's Prairie is surrounded by abandoned land,* mostly old field, and is well buffered from adverse impact. Future protection of this unique prairie will require maintaining an adequate buffer zone. The esker bordering the east side and portions of the old field to the south and west Mould serve ' this purpose. The adjacent old field community contains occasional native grasses and forbs making the potential for restoration possible . Maintenance of Jim's Prairie will also require periodic burning to _control the encroaching of shrubs and -trees; invasion of trembling aspen is noticeable on the west and southern parts of the tract. The Natural Heritage Program considers Jim's Prairie a significant natural area and recommends its preservation. There is only one other occurrence of black -soil prairie known for Ramsey County, where nearly all land is urbanized or under cultivation. In E. Central Minnesota, there are 11 known black -soil prairies of natural area quality, totaling 324 acres. The proximity of Jim's Prairie to the Twin Cities makes this area ideal for educational uses, and adds to its value for preservation. The Maplewood Nature Center currently uses the prairie. for natural. history instruction. Overall Element Rank Black -Soil Prairie (EX. MN) : B3 = state threatened Element Occurrence Rank Jim's Prairie: B -C , Natural areas which due to slight man- induced disturbance s or their small size are not considered outstanding natural areas (rank - A) . Howeve r these areas still maintain their ecological integrity and are representative of the P resettlement landscape These tracts are especially valuable to local communities as education sites.