Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984 10-22 City Council Packettul HNHKU ur blUS 1. Used Vehicles H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS I} NEW BUSINESS I 10 Letter From Ralph McGinley (_Advance Circuits 2. T.H. 120 3M Road Si*qnals 30 Beaver Lake Drainage Study VISITOR PRESENTATIONS _ K COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3 4, 3 b, 8 100 L)ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS M)ADJOURNMENT Minutes of Maplewood City Council 7:00 P.M., Monday, October 8, 1984 East County Line Fire Department No. 2 Meeting No. 84 -22 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held at the EastCountyLineFireDepartmentNo. 2, 2501 Londin Lane, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present MaryLee Maida, Councilmember Present Michael T. Wasiluk, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 84 -21 September 24, 1984) as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. APPROVAL OF AGEND Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. Highwood 2. Storm Shelter 3. November 12,, 1984 Meeting 4. Budget Transfer - Voting Machines Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Anderson moved, seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk, Ayes -all, to approve the Consent Agenda, Items 1 through 7 as recoihmended: 1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part I, Fees, Services, Expenses, Check register dated September 26, 1984 through October 1, 1984 - $382,262.69: Part II, Payroll - Check dated September 21, 1984 — $63,396.72) in the amount of $445,659.41. 2. Delinquent Sewer Bills Resolution 84 -10 -140 RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify to the Auditor of Ramsey County the attached list of delinquent sewer rental charges and hydrant charges said list made a part herein, for certification against the tax levy of said property owners for the year 1984, collectible in 1985, and which listing includes interest at the rate of eight (8%) on the total amount for one year. Total amount to be certified: $56,937.04. 3. Delinquent Weed Cutting Resolution No. 84 -10 -141 RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify to the Auditor of Ramsey County the attached list of delinquent weed cutting charges said list made a part herein the certification against the tax levy of said property owners for the year 1984, collectible in 1985 and which listing includes interest at the rate of eight (8%) percent on the total amount for the year. 57 48960 060 04 $ 32.40 57 48960 020 05 70.20 57 63100 150 15 48.60 57 62800 050 01 39.96 57 29810 090 27 34.56 57 48950 010 06 60.48 57 48950 010 06 24.84 4. Budget Transfer Accepted the donation of $1,250.00 from the Maplewood Moose Lodge, North St. Paul VFW and Champion Paper Company of St. Paul for the purpose of purchasing hydrant marker flags. Approved the transfer of $1,250.00 from the hydrant charge contingency account into the hydrant charge maintenance materials account. 5. Change Order - Holloway Avenue Improvement Resolution No. 84 -10 -142 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore entered into a Joint Powers Agreement with Ramsey County and North St. Paul and has ordered made Improvement Project No, 81 -12 and, has let a construction contract therefor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429; and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project No. 81 -12, Change Order No. 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order No. 3. 2 - 10/8 6. Appropriation for Fireworks Donations Donations that have been received for the July 4th Celebration at Wakefield Park. The money received has been earmarked strictly for Fireworks. City Council action is required to appropriate these funds to the above account. Metropolitan Inspection Service 45.85 North Maplewood Lions Club 100.00 Chicone's Bar & Cafe 30.00 Party Time Liquors 25.00 Circus 100.00 Maplewood Moose Lodge 200.00 St. Paul Ski Club 50.00 Maplewood Bowl, Inc.35.40 Video King 35.00 St. Paul Suburban Bus 30.00 Hardee's Restaurant 26.50 Gladstone House 30.00 Warner's Hardware 60.00 Midas Muffler 23.75 T91.5b 7. Maplewood Project 82 -9 Stipulation Hedlund) Resolution No. 84 -10 -143 WHEREAS, the Parcel No. 22 is owned by Gordon Hedlund and is described as follows: Lot 21, Block 31, Gladstone Plat 2,Property ID Number 57 29810 210 31, Ramsey County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, that owner pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.061 and 429.081 has taken timely appeal from that special assessment for local public improvement Project No. 82 -9 for storm drainage; WHEREAS, Respondent adopted a special assessment for local public improvement Project No. 82 -9 so far as the same pertains to said Parcel 22 in the amount of $437.00 on August 11, 1983; NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. That as to Parcel 22, the assessment levied by the City Council, on August 11, 1983 for development of a storm drainage system is hereby dismissed. 2. That the effective date of the dismissal of the assessment shall be October 8, 1984. 3. That the owner, through the undersigned, their attorney hereby waive any and all right of further notice and appeal as provided forth in Minnesota Statutes Section 429 as amended. 4. That the above proposed dismissal of assessment is accepted by the City Council through the undersigned, its City Attorney and shall constitute the special assessment for local public improvement project against said Property Identification No. 57 29810 210 31. 3 - 10/8 5. That the terms and provisions of Maplewood City Council Resolutions adopting the original assessment role insofar as they are not otherwise inconsistent herewith, are incorporated herein by reference. 6. The Maplewood City Clerk shall, upon appropriate City Council action, forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of the rescinded assessment as determined hereunder to the Ramsey County Auditor to be removed on the property and the owner shall not be liable for penalties and interest through and including the date hereof. 7. That the above entitled action having been hereby fully compromised and settled, is stipulated and agreed that the same may be, and hereby is dismissed on its merits with prejudice and the Clerk of said above named District Court, upon filing of the Stipulation, is hereby authorized and directed to dismiss any action of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals all as the day and year first above written. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M. 1985 Budget a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the adoption of the 1985 Budget. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 - 10- - 144 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the budget for 1985 is hereby adopted as outlined in the following summary: Capital Debt Operating Improvements Service Budget Budget Budget Estimated Balances 1 -1 -85 $4,204,9 3T9 $555,9 6 Revenues 9,318,200 244,750 2,966,670 Net other increases(decreases) (1,235,550) 1,275,384 155,146 Expenditures 8,812,620 2,253,800 2,963,620 Estimated Balances 12 -31 -85 $3,475,016 $1,510,113 $5,614,162 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following appropriations are hereby approved for the 1985 Operating Budget: General Fund: 572,290 General Government 220,340 Finance 178,890 City Clerk 3,151,070 Public Safety 1,057,320 Public Works 789,980 Community Services 287,530 Community Development 62b/,4ZO General Fund Total 4 - 10/8 Hydrant Charge Fund`. 94,530 Public Works Sewer Fund: 175,120 City Clerk 1,982,860 Public Works V.E.M. Fund: 302,690 Public Works 8,812,620 Total Operating Budget Appropriations BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following appropriations are hereby approved for the 1985 Capital Improvements Budget: Capital Improvement Projects Fund: 2,000,000 Construction of new City Hall Park Development Fund: 83,000 Various park improvement projects as listed in the 1985 Budget document) Street Construction State Aid Fund: 120,000 Street overlay and sealcoating program 50,000 Traffic signal and opticom installations 2 -75T Total Capital Improvements Budget Appropriation BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following appropriations principal, interest and fiscal charges are hereby approved for the 1985 Debt Service Budget: 220,580 Debt Service Funds 2,743,040 Special Assessment Fund - Debut Service Accounts Total Debt Service Budget Appropriations BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that authorization is hereby given to transfer $230,000 of revenue sharing monies to the General Fund to partly finance the contracts between the City and its three fire departments: Gladstone, Parkside and East County Line. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the transfer of appropriations among the various accounts within a department budget or within a non - departmental expense category shall only require the approval of the City Manager, except that any transfer of appropriations within a departmental budget so as to increase the salary approp- riation shall require the approval of the City Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all appropriations which are not encumbered or expended at the end of the fiscal year shall lapse and shall become a part of the unencumbered fund balance which may be appropriated for the next fiscal year except appropriations for capital improvement projects which shall not lapse until the project is completed or cancelled by the City Council. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 5 - 10/8 d. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 - 10 - 145 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that: 1.The following amounts of taxes be levied for 1985, payable in 1985, upon the taxable property in said City of Maplewood, for the following purposes: General Operations $3,834,800 Debt Service 731,500 Total Levy $4,bbb,300 2.There is on hand in the following sinking funds excess amounts as indicated after each fund and such shall be used to pay on the appropriate obligations of the City: Description 1967 General Obligation Sanitary Sewer Bonds $ 3,400 1967 General Obligation Improvement Bonds 11,100 1968 Improvement Bonds 11,000 1969 General Obligation Improvement Bonds 6,100 1972 General Obligation Improvement Bonds - Series 1 8,400 1972 General Obligation Improvement Bonds - Series 2 2,500 1973 Improvement Bonds 107,200 1977 Public Works Building Bonds 20,700 1977 General Obligation Improvement Bonds - Series 2 121,300 1979 General Obligation Improvement Bonds 9,700 1980 Fire Station Bonds 3,700 305,100 In accordance with Minnesota Statutes 475.61 and 273.13, Subd. 19 (3), (a), b), (c) and Chapter 297a and Chapter 162 of Minnesota Statutes, the County Auditor of Ramsey County is hereby authorized and directed to reduce by the amounts above mentioned the tax that would be otherwise included in the rolls for the year 1984 and collectible in 1985. 3.It has been determined that the following bond issues have insufficient pro- jected assets to meet projected liabilities, as required by State Statute, and the original resolution levying ad- valoren taxes must be increased in the following amount: Increase l Description In Levy 1970 General Obligation Improvement Bonds $ 29,700 1977 General Obligation Improvement Bonds - Series 1 28,000 Total $ 57,700 4.Changes set forth in sections one (1) and two (2) above result in a net re- duction of $247,400 and are summarized and hereby adopted in the attached Schedule. Such amounts shown are the total amounts to be spread on the rolls in 1984 and collectible in 1985 for each of the bond issues shown, including the reductions and increases in levy amounts set forth in sections one (1) and two (2) above. 6 - 10 /8 7 - 10/8 5. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to furnish a copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Ramsey County forthwith. BONDS & INTEREST LEVIES COLLECTIBLE 1985 Code Per Bond Amount Bond Issues Amount Date No.Register Levied Consolidated Improvement $975M 12/1/64 19 0- $0- Municipal Building 175M 5/1/65 05 0-0- General Obligation Improvement 835M 12/1/65 19 17,000 17,000 General Obligation Improvement 750M 12/1/66 19 24,000 24,000 General Obligation Imp. San. Sewer 645M 7/1/67 16 12,000 8,600 General Obligation Improvement 450M 12/1/67 17 12,000 900 General Obligation Improvement 380M 12/1/68 18 11,000 0- General Obligation Improvement 1,980M 12/1/69 23 45,000 38,900 General Olbigation Improvement 605M 12/1/70 26 10,000 39,700 wneral Obligation Improvement 1,740M 8/1/71 23 65,000 65,000 State Aid Bonds 540M 8/1/71 06 0-0- General Obligation Improvement 1,090M 5/1/72 20 30,000 21,600 General Obligation Improvement 670M 12/1/72 21 30,000 27,500 General Obligation Improvement 2,175M 7/1/73 22 107,200 0- General Obligation Improvement 1,240M 11/1/74 26 40,000 40,000 General Obligation Improvement 1,360M 12/1/75 26 75,000 75,000 General Obligation Improvement 1,990M 5/1/76 26 -132,000 132,000 General Obligation Improvement- Series 1 3,730M 4/1/77 24 27,400 55,400 Public Works Building Bonds 995M 4/1/77 07 86,300 65,600 General Obligation Improvement - Series 2 3,815M 10/1/77 25 126,000 4,700 oral Obligation Bonds - 1979 825M 8/1/79 27 52,000 42,300 Station Bonds 470M 8/1/80 08 77,000 73,300 978,900 $731,500 7 - 10/8 Tax Levies Pledged to Redeem G.O. Refunding Improvement Bonds 1974 Tax Leview Pledged to Redeem G.O. Refunding Improvement Bonds 1977 Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 2. 7:00 P.M. Variance - 1770 Edward (Galbraith) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Albert and Marilyn Galbraith for a side yard setback variance of 18.5 feet to construct an addition to their house. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Commissioner Lorraine Fischer presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: WHEREAS, Albert and Marilyn Galbraith applied for a variance for the following - described property: Lots 10 and 11 and the south 6 feet of lot 9 in block 8, Lakeside Park This property is also known as 1770 Edward Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, Section 36 -71 (1) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires a 30 foot side yard setback on the street side of a corner lot; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing an 11.5 foot setback, requiring a variance of 18.5 feet; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on September 7, 1984. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on October 1, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said variance be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the above described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. There is an undue hardship on this lot because it is substandard in width 70 feet). Code requires 100 feet of width. The required side yard setback of 30 feet unduly restricts the buildable width of the lot and the house is already built to the minimum setback on the north side. a 2. The spirit and intent of the ordinance is to keep a uniform setback from public streets and provide adequate sight distance at the corner. The intent of the ordinance is met, because: a. Sophia Street is a short street without uniform setbacks. b. Council approved a variance in 1972 to allow the house across the street 1763 Edward Street) to be built with a side yard setback of 15 feet. 8- 10/8 c. While there are no records of variances, aerial photos show that the garage at 1756 Edward Street and the hosue at 1758 Phalen Place appear to be built at the right of way line. d. The existing garage is already built 9.5 feet from the right of way line. e. The addition would not be seen by any other houses, except the house to the south, because of existing trees. f. The addition would not interfere with the sight distance at the corner. Commissioner Whitcomb seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Fischer, Larson, Pellish, Sigmundik, Whitcomb." d. Applicants were in attendance at the meeting and agreed with the Planning Commission recommendations. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Councilmember Maida introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 84 - 10 - 146 WHEREAS, Albert and Marilyn Galbraith applied for a variance for the following described property: Lots 10 and 11 and the south 6 feet of lot 9 in Block 8, Lakeside Park This property is also known as 1770 Edward Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, Section 36 -71(1) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires a 30 foot side yard setback on the street side of a corner lot; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on September 7, 1984. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on October 1, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said variance be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on October 8, 1984 to consider this variance. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. a All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY .COUNCIL that the above described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 9 - 10/8 1. There is an undue hardship on this lot because it is substandard in width 70 feet). Code requires 100 feet of width. The required side yard setback of 30 feet unduly restricts the buildable width of the lot and the house is already built to the minimum setback on the north side. 2. The spirit and intent of the ordinance is to keep a uniform setback from public streets and provide adequate sight distance at the corner. The intent of the ordinance is met, because: a. Sophia Street is a short street without uniform setbacks. b. Council approved a variance in 1972 to allow the house across the street 1763 Edward Street) to be built with a sideyard setback of 15 feet. c. While there are no records of variances, aerial photos show that the garage at 1756 Edward Street and the house at 1758 Phalen Place appear to be built at the right of way line. d. The existing garage is already built 9.5 feet from the right of way line. e. The addition would not be seen by any other houses, except the house to the south, because of existing trees. f. The addition would not interfere with sight distance at the corner. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 3. a IDR Moggen Landscaping a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Moggen Landscaping for a $1,200,000 Industrial Revenue Note to acquire land and construct and equip a 15,000 square foot office building to be located on the east side of White Bear Avenue between Lydia Avenue and Beam Avenue, directly north of the Maplewood East Shopping Center. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Ms. Mary Ippel, Briggs and Morgen, explained the specifics of the proposal. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 - 10 - 147 RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT TO THE 10 - 10/8 ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT WHEREAS, a) The purpose of Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, known as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (the "Act ") as found.and determined by the legislature is to promote the welfare of the state by the active attraction and encouragement and development of economi- cally sound industry and commerce to prevent so far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; b) Factors necessitating the active promotion and development of economically sound industry and commerce are the increasing concentration of population in the metropolitan areas and the rapidly rising increase in the amount and cost of governmental services required to meet the needs of the increased population and the need for development of land use which will provide an adequate tax base to finance these increased costs and access to employment opportunities for such population; c) The City Council of the City of Maplewood the "City ") has received from Mogren Landscaping, a general partnership organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota the "Company ") a proposal that the City assist in financing a Project hereinafter described, through the issuance of a Revenue Bond or Bonds or a Revenue Note or Notes hereinafter referred to in this resolution as "Revenue Bonds" pursuant to the Act; d) The City desires to facilitate the selec- tive development of the community, retain and improve the tax base and help to provide the range of services and employment opportunities required by the population; and the Project will assist the City in achieving those objectives. The Project will help to increase assessed valuation of the City and help maintain a positive relationship between assessed valuation and debt and enhance the image and reputation of the community; e) The Company is currently engaged in the business of sod and landscaping. The Project to be financed by the Revenue Bonds is an approximately 15,000 square foot office building to be located on the East side of White Bear Avenue between Lydia Avenue and Beam Avenue directly North of the Maplewood East Shopping Center in Maplewood, Minnesota to be leased to Edina Realty and consists of the acquisition of land and the construction of buildings and improvements thereon and the installation of equipment therein to be initially owned and operated by the Company, and will result in the employment of additional persons to work within the new facilities; 11 - 10/8 f) The City has been advised by representa tives of Company that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital cost of the Project is available only on a limitedbasisandatsuchhighcostsofborrowingthattheeconomic feasibility of operating the Project would be significantly reduced, but Company has also advised this Council that with the aid of municipal financing, and its resulting low borrowing cost, the Project is economically more feasible; g) Pursuant to a resolution of the City Council adopted on September 10, 1984, a public hearing on the Project was held on October 8, 1984, after notice waspublished, and materials made available for public inspectionattheCityHall, all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b at which public hearing all those appearing who so desired to speak were heard; h) No public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly benefit financially from the Project. Noll, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Council hereby gives preliminary approval to the proposal of Company that the City undertake the ProjectpursuanttotheMinnesotaMunicipalIndustrialDevelopment ActChapter474, Minnesota Statutes), consisting of the acqui-sition, construction and equipping of an approximately 15,000 square foot office building to be located on the East side ofWhiteBearAvenuebetweenLydiaAvenueandBeamAvenuedirectly north of the Maplewood East Shopping Center in Maplewood,Minnesota, to be leased to Edina Realty pursuant to Company's specifications suitable for the operations described above to be initially owned and operated by the Company and pursuant to a revenue agreement between the City and Company upon such terms and conditions with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary, so as to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal of and interest on the Revenue Bonds in the maximum aggregate principal amount of 1,200,000 to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project; and said agreement may also provide for the entire interest of Company therein to be mortgaged to the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds; and th,e City hereby undertakes preliminarily to issue its Revenue Bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions; 2. On the basis of information available to this Council it appears, and the Council hereby finds, that the Project constitutes properties, real and personal, used or useful in connection with one or more revenue producing enterprises engaged in any business within the meaning of Subdivision la of Section 474.02 of the Act; that the Project furthers the 12 - 10/8 purposes stated in Section 474.01, Minnesota Statutes; that the Project would not be undertaken but for the availability of industrial bond financing; that the availability of the financing under the Act and willingness of the City to furnish such financing will be a substantial inducement to Company to undertake the Project, and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the development of . economically sound industry and commerce, to assist in the prevention of the emergence of blighted and marginal land, to help prevent chronic unemployment, to help the City retain and improve the tax base and to provide the range of service and employment opportunities required by the population, to help prevent the movement of talented and educated persons out of the state and to areas within the State where their services may not be as effectively used, to promote more intensive development and use of land within the City and eventually to increase the tax base of the community; 3. The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by the City subject to the approval of the Project by the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority or such other state officer having authority to grant approval (the Authority "), and subject to final approval by this Council, Company, and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the ulti- mate details of the financing of the Project; 4. In accordance with Subdivision 7a of Section 474.01 Minnesota Statutes, the Mayor of the City is hereby authorized and directed to submit the proposal for the Project to the Authority requesting its approval, and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide the Authority with such preliminary information as it may require; 5. Company has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project whether or not the Project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by the Authority will be paid by Company; 6. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, and , investment bankers, are authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Project, to consult with the City Attorney, Company and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms and provisions of the Revenue Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary documents and to submit such documents to the Council for final approval; 7. Nothing in this resolution or in the documents pre- pared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or funds 13 - 10/8 of the City except the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall the City be subject to any liability thereon. The holder of the Revenue Bonds shall never have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the outstanding principal on the Revenue Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City. The Revenue Bonds shall recite in substance that the Revenue Bonds, including interest thereon, is payable solely from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation; S. In anticipation of the approval by the Authority the issuance of the Revenue'Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Project, and in order that completion of the Project will not be unduly delayed when approved, Company is hereby authorized to make such expenditures and advances toward payment of that portion of the costs of the Project to be financed from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds as Company con- siders necessary, including the use of interim, short -term financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds if and when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the City; 9. If construction of the Project is not started within one year from the date hereof, this resolution shall thereafter have no force and effect and the preliminary approval herein granted is withdrawn; Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this day of October, 1984. Mayor Attest: ty Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all 3b. 7:10 P.M. Hideaway - Liquor License a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Greg Tulgren for an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License to be located at the Hideaway, 70 E. County Road B. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Mr. James Finley, attorney for applicant, spoke on behalf of the request. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. 1 4 - 10/8 e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the On Sale Li Tulqren subject to better liqhtinq in the oar inq lot an 84 - 10 - 148 License for on: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that pursuant to action by the City Council of the City of Maplewood on October 8, 1984, an On Sale Intoxicating Liquor License was approved for Greg Tulgren dba The Hideaway, 70 E. County Road B; The Council proceeded in this matter as outlined under the provisions of the City Ordinances. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian, Maida and Wasiluk. Nays - Mayor Greavu. 3. 7:20 P.M. Mortgage Revenue Bond Financing (Podawiltz) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing to consider the proposal of Maple Ridge Partnership that the City undertake a program to finance the proposed development by the issuance of revenue obligation. The development consists of the construction and equipping of a multi - family rental housing development of approximately 100 units. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Mr. Mike Podawiltz, the developer, spoke on behalf of the proposal. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 84 - 10 - 149 RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A FINANCING PROGRAM FOR A MULTI - FAMILY RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT AND THE PROGRAM, AND THE AMENDMENT OF THE HOUSING REVENUE BOND PROGRAMS PORTION OF THE CITY "S 462C HOUSING PLAN TO INCLUDE THE PROGRAM PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C, AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD TO ISSUE HOUSING REVENUE BONDS AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF THE FINANCING PROGRAM FOR THE PROJECT FOR APPROVAL TO THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY AND 15 - 10 /R AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE SAID PROJECT AND PROGRAM MAPLE RIDGE PARTNERSHIP PROJECT) WHEREAS, a) Minnesota statutes, Chapter 462C the "Act) confers upon cities the power toissuerevenuebondstofinanceaprogramforthepurposesofplanning, administering,making or purchasing loans with respect to One or more multi - family housing developmentswithintheboundariesofthecity; b) The City has received from MapleRidgePartnership, a Minnesota limited partnership (the "Developer "),* a proposalthattheCityundertakeaprogramtofinance a Project hereinafter described; through theIssuanceofrevenuebondsorobligations (in one or more series or which may be in the form of a single debt instrument) (theBonds ") pursuant to the Act; c) The City desires tot facilitate the development of rental housing within the community; encourage the development of affordable housing opportunities for residents of the City; encourage the development of housing facilities designedforoccupancybypersonsoflowormoderate income; and encourage the development of blighted or underutilized land and structures within the boundaries of the City; and the Project will assist the City in achieving these objectives; d) The City desires to expand the Housing Revenue Bond Programs" portion of its 462C Housing Plan to incorporate the program for the Project; e) The Developer is currently engaged in the business of real estate development. The Project to be financed by the Bonds isatheconstructionandequippingofan approximately 118,575 square foot multi- family rental housing development of 100 rental units, consisting of 43 one- bedroom units and 57 two - bedroom units, located North of County Road D, South of 694 and East of Hazelwood Street in the City, and consists of the construction of buildings an 16 - 10/8 such land which will result in the provision of additional rental housing opportunities to persons within the community; f) The City has been advised by the Developer that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital costs of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the Project would be significantly reduced, but the Developer has also advised the City that with the aid of municipal financing, and resulting low borrowing costs, the Project is economically more feasible; g) A public hearing on the Project, the financing program and the amendment of the "Housing Revenue Bond Programs" portion of the City's 462C Housing Plan therefor was held at 7:20 p.m. on October 8, 1984, after notice was published, all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.O5 subd. S. at which public hearing all those appearing at said hearing who desired to speak were heard; h) No public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly benefit financially from the Project. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City hereby gives' preliminary approval to the proposal of the Developer that the City undertake the Project, described above, and the program of financing therefor, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, consisting of the construction and equipping of multi - family rental housing facilities within the City pursuant to the Developer's specifications and to a revenue agreement between the City and the Developer on such terms and conditions with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary, so as to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal and interest on the Bonds in a total principal amount of approx- imately $3,800,000 to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the construction and equipping of the Project; and said agreement may also provide for the entire interest of the Developer therein to be mortgaged to the purchaser or purchasers of the Bonds, or a trustee for the holder(s) of the Bonds; and the City hereby undertakes preliminarily to issue its bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions; 17 - 10/8 2. The "Housing Revenue Bond Programs" portion of the City's 462C Housing Plan as herein proposed to be amended is hereby approved and adopted and the City Clerk is authorized and directed to subunit the amended 462C Housing Plan to the Metropolitan Council for its review and comment. The comments of the Metropolitan Council, if any; shall be submitted to the City Council for its consideration; 3. At the option of the Developer, the financing may be structured so as to take advantage of whatever means are available and are permitted by law to enhance the security for, or marketability of, the Bonds, provided that any such financing structure must be approved by the City; 4. On the basis of information available to the City, it appears; and the City hereby finds, that the Project constitutes a multifamily housing development within the meaning of subdivision 5 of Section 462C.02 of the Act; that the Project will be primarily occupied, in part, by persons of low or moderate income; that the availability of the financing under the Act and the willingness of the City to provide such financing will be a substantial inducement to the Developer to undertake the Project, and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the provision of additional multi - family rental housing opportunities to residents of the City, to assist in the prevention of the emergence of blighted and marginal land and to promote more intensive development and use of land within the City; S. The Project, and the program to finance the Project by the issuance of revenue bonds; is hereby given preliminary approval by the City subject to the approval of the financing program by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (the MHFA ") and subject to final approval by the City; the Developer and the purchasers of the Bonds as to ultimate details of the financing of the Project; 6: In accordance with subdivision 5 of Section 462C.05, Minnesota Statutes, the Mayor of the City is hereby authorized and directed to submit the program for financing the Project to the MHFA, requesting its approval, and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide the MHFA with preliminary information as it.may require; 7. The Developer has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project whether or not the Project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by MHFA will be paid by the Developer; 18 - 10/8 S. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, and Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc., are authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Project and the financing program therefor, to consult with the City Attorney, the City'sfiscalconsultant, Developer and purchasers of the Bonds (or trustee for the purchasers of the Bonds) as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms and provisions of the Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary documents and submit such documents to the City for final approvals 9. Nothing in this Resolution or the documents prepared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of anymunicipalfundsontheProjectotherthantherevenuesderived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose. The Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or funds of the City except the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall the City be subject to any liability thereon. The holder or holders of the Bonds shall never have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the outstanding principal on the Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereon against any property of the City. The Bonds shall recite in substance that the Bonds, including the interest thereon, are payable solely from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof. The Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation; 10. -In anticipation of the approval by the M"A and the issuance of the Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Project, and in order that completion of the project will not be unduly delayed when approved, the Developer is herebyauthorizedtomakesuchexpendituresandadvancestoward payment of that portion of the costs of the Project to be financed from the proceeds of the Bonds, as the Developer. considers necessary, including the use of interim, short —term financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Bonds if any when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the City. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota this 8th day of October, 1984. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 4. 7:30 P.M. Conditional Use Permit - 2646 Maryland Avenue a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Katherine Shonka for a conditional use permit to operate a beauty salon as a home occupation. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. 19 - 10/8 c. Commissioner Lorraine Fischer presented the following Planning Commission's recommendation: Commissioner Whitcomb moved the Planning Commission recommend the City Council adopt the following resolution: WHEREAS, Katherine Shonka initiated a conditional use permit to operate a beauty shop as a home occupation at the following - described property: Lot 3, Block 6, Midvale Acres This property is also known as 2646 E. Maryland Avenue, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by Katherine Shonka, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on September 17, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said permit be approved. WHEREAS, Section 36 -66 of the City Code requires home occupations to conform to the following requirements: 1. Not more than one person, other than members of the family residing on the premises, shall be allowed to engage in such occupation. 2. An area equivalent to no more than twenty (20) percent of each level of the dwelling unit floor area shall be used in the conduct of a home occupation. 3. There shall be no change in the outside appearance of the building or premises, that would indicate the conduct of a home occupation, other than one sign meeting the requirements of the City sign code. 4. Limited retail sales of products produced off -site may be permitted, but only when subordinate to the principal activity of the home occupation. 5. No traffic shall be generated by a home occupation in greater volumes than would normally be expected in a residential neighborhood. The need for off- street parking shall not exceed more than three off - street parking spaces for home occupations at any given time, in addition to the parking spaces required by the resident occupatns. 6. No equipment or process shall be used in such home occupation which creates noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odors or electrical interference detectable to the normal senses off the lot. In the case of electrical interference in any radio or television receiver *, off the premises, or cause fluctuations in line voltage off the premises. 7. No fire safety or health hazard shall exist. 8. A home occupation shall not include the repair of internal combustion engines, body shops, machine shops, welding, ammunition manufacturing or other objectionable uses as determined by the City. Machine shops are defined as places where raw metal is fabricated, using machines that operate on more than one hundred twenty (120) volts of current. 20 - 10/8 9. Any violation of these requirements shall result in the denial or revocation of the home occupation. 10. Approval shall be for a period not to exceed one year. Renewal shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 17, Article II, of the City Licensing Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the above - described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings -of -fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is granted for one year from the date of Council approval subject to the following conditions: 1. An exit from the basement in addition to the existing stairway shall be completed and approved by the City Building Official before customers may be per- mitted in the shop area. The basement stairway shall also be brought into compli- ance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC). 2. An operative 10 -pound dry chemical, all purpose fire extinguisher must be wall mounted and readily available in the beauty shop and a smoke detector is to be installed near the stairway. 3. Renewal may be granted if all of the home occupation code requirements have been complied with and no nuisance situations persist. 21 - 10/8 4. A license shall be obtained from the City Clerk in January, 1985 and every year thereafter for which the conditional use permit is in effect. Commissioner Sigmundik seconded. Ayes -- Commissioners Barrett, Ellefson, Fischer, Larson, Pellish, Sigmundik, Whitcomb." d. Kathy Shonka, the applicant, stated she agrees to the conditions. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its a 84 - 10 - 150 WHEREAS, Katherine Shonka initiated a conditional use permit to operate a beauty shop as a home occupation at the following described property: Lot 3, Block 6, Midvale Acres This property is also known as 2646 E. Maryland Avenue, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: i 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by Katherine Shonka, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. ion: 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on September 17, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said permit be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on October 8, 1984. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considreed reports and recommendtions of the City Staff and Plan- ning Commission. WHEREAS, Section 36 -66 of the City Code requires home occupations to conform to the following requirements: 1. Not more than one person, other than members of the family residing on the premises, shall be allowed to engage in such occupation. 2. An area equivalent to no more than twenty (20) percent of eachlevel of the dwelling unit floor area „shall be used in the conduct of a home occupation. 3. There shall be no change in the outside appearance of the building or premises, that would indicate the conduct of a home occupation, other than one sign meeting the requirements of the City sign code. 4. Limited retail sales of products produced off -site may be permitted, but only when subordinate to the principal activity of the home occupation. 22 - 10 /8 5. No traffic shall be generated by a home occupation in greater volumes than would normally be expected in a residential neighborhood. The need for off - street parking shall not exceed more than three off - street parking spaces for home occupat- ions at any given time, in addition to the parking spaces required by the resident occupants. 6. No equipment or process noise, vibration, glare, fumes, the normal senses off the lot. or process shall be used which or television receivers off the off the premises. shall be used in such home occupation which creates odors or electrical interference detectable to In the case of electrical interference, no equipment reates visual or audible interference in any radio premises, or caused fluctuations in line voltage 7. No fire safety or health hazard shall exist. 8. A home occupation shall not include the repair of internal combustion engines, body shops, machine shops, welding, ammunition manufacturing or other objectionable uses as determined by the City. Machine shops are defined as places where raw metal is fabricated, using machines that operate on more than one hundred twenty (120) volts of current. 9. Any violation of these requirements shall result in the denial or revocation . of the home occupation. 10. Approval shall be for a period not to exceed one year. Renewal shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 17, Article II, of the City licensing code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings - of -fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water fun -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 23 - 10/8 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. A pproval is granted for one year from the date of Council approval subject to the following conditions: 1. An exit from the basement in addition to the existing stariway shall be completed and approved by the City Building Official before customers may be permitted in the shop area. The basement stairway shall also be brought into compliance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC). 2. An operative 10 -pound dry chemical, all purpose fire extinguisher must be wall mounted and readily available in the beauty shop and a smoke detector is to be installed near the stairway. 3. Renewal may be granted if all of the home occupation code requirements have been complied with and no nuisance situations persist. 4. A license shall be obtained from the City Clerk in January, 1985 and every year thereafter for which the conditional use permit is in effect. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 5. 7:40 P.M. PU D Revision: Sterling Glen a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Castle Design and Development Company to revise the conditional use permit for Maple Greens planned unit development to substitute 64 rental apartment units eight buildings) for 52 quad units (13 buildings) and to vacate the plat and streets. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Commissioner Lorraine Fischer presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: Commissioner Whitcomb moved the planning commission recommend the City Council adopt the following resolutions vacating the plat and streets and amending the conditional use permit for the Maple Greens planned unit development to substitute eight eight -plex apartment structures for 13 four -plex town house (quad) structures originally approved south of ,Geranium Avenue along Evar Street and Jessamine Avenue presently platted as block one and lots one through 36, block two) Sterling Glen Addition: WHEREAS, Castle Design and Development initiated a revision to the conditional use permit for the Maple Greens planned unit development at the following described property: Block one and lots one through 36, block two Sterling Glen Addition, Section 25, Township 29, Range 22; 24 - 10/8 WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by Castle Design and Development, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on September 17, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said permit be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above described conditional use permit revision be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to the present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 11. The revision is consistent with the original planned unit development. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant vacating the underlying platted lots and street rights of way from the Sterling Glen Addition. 2. Construction beginning within one year, unless Council authorizes a time extension, if necessary: 25 - 10/8 3. Adherence to the site plan dated September 11, 1984, with the following revisions: a. Increase the parking stalls to 20 feet of depth. b. Increase the separation between the open parking stalls and the dwelling units to at least 15 feet. 4. Approval of the site, building and landscape plans by the Community Design Review Baord. 5. Submission of an erosion control plan for approval by the City Engineer. WHEREAS, Castle Design initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following described real property: Block one, lots one through 36, block two, Sterling Glen Addition, Section 25, Township 29, Range 22, including Evar Street and Jessamine Avenue WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. This vacation was initiated by Castle Design. 2. A majority of the owners of property abutting said streets have signed a petition for this vacation. 3. This vacation was reviewed by the Planning Commission September 17, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that this vacation be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that it is in the public interest to grant the above described vacation. Commissioner Barrett seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Barrett, Ellefson, Larson, Pellish, Sigmundik, Whitcomb." rel e Mayor Greavu called for proponents. The following were heard: Mr. Ken Gervais, Castle Design, the applicant, spoke on behalf of the proposal. Mayor Greavu called for opponents The following were heard: Steve Zilensky, 1344 Evar Judy Stadler, 1142 Evar Malcolm Johnson, 1139 Ferndale Tim Kennedy, 1134 Glendon Jim Bohmen, 1145 Glendon Mark Bender, 1158 Glendon Bruce Johnson, 1133 Ferndale Ron Green, 2522 Rose Avenue Ron Williams, 1183 Glendon Thor Becker, 1158 Sterling Scott Kesler, 1158 Sterling 26 - 10/8 Ron Pierce, 1146 Glendon Bob Pettitt, 1157 Ferndale. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Bastian moved to table the request for change in Maple Green's P.U.D. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. h. City Attorney Don Lais was instructed to investigate the easements for Mary Lake Road. Mayor Greavu called a recess. Mayor Greavu reconvened the meeting at 9:17 P.M. G. AWARD OF BIDS None. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. No Parking - County Road D a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mr. Fred Shoot, Emerald Inn,and also the Director of Learning Tree Day Care Center both spoke regarding the "no parking" restrictions. c. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 - 10 - 151 WHEREAS, a number of larger trucks have been parking along County Road D re- sulting in restricted sight distance; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that Ramsey County is requested to designate both sides of County Road D from White Bear Avenue to Ariel Street a "No Parking" zone. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. I. Councilmember Anderson moved to sus I -3 at this time Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. NEW BUSINESS Ayes - all. 3. Driveway Permit - 2800 White Bear Avenue - Todd a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the request of William Todd, 2800 White Bear Avenue, to keep a concrete slab within the tive toot south se ac Ayes - all. the "Rules of Procedures" to discuss Item 27 - 10 /8 Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (continues) 2. Ordinance on Planning Fees (Second Reading) a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the followina ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 573 Section 1. Section 36 -26 of the Zoning Code of the City of Maplewood is hereby amended as follows: Section 36 -26. Fees. The following nonrefundable application fees shall be required: Zone Change Conditional Use Permit Planned Unit Development Comprehensive Plan Amendment Variances: R -1 All other districts Vacations Lot Divisions Preliminary Plat Home Occupation Permit Final Plat 140 140 140 140 40 80 45 30 for each lot created 140 40 15 for an annual renewal 30 Section 2. Section 36 -258 of the Sign Code is amended as follows: Section 36 -258. Fees. 1) A sign erection permit fee (except for billboards) shall be paid in accordance with the following schedule: Square Feet Fee 1 -10 10 11 -25 15 26 -50 25 51 -100 60 over 100 110 2) The fee for erection of billboards shall be $8.00 for the first five square feet, plus 47Q for each additional square foot. 3) The annual license fee for billboards shall be $205. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect on January 1, 1985. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 3. Contract With Architectural Alliance 28 - 10 /8 a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mayor Greavu moved to enter into a contract as submitted with Architectural Alliance regarding the proposed new City Hall. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 4. Ordinance on Liquor License Bonds (Second Reading) a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 574 An Ordinance Regarding Liquor License Bonds Section 1. Section 5 -109 of the Maplewood City Ordinances regarding bonds required from licensees is hereby amended to read as follows: a) No "on sale" license under this division shall be granted until a bond in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000.00) has been furnished, approved by the City Council and filed with the proper City officers. Such bond shall cover both the regular "on sale" license and any Sunday sales license issued to the same licensee. b) No "off sale" license under this division shall be granted until a bond in the sum of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) shall be furnished and approved by the State Commissioner of Public Safety and the City Council, and filed with the proper City Officers. c) The surety on a bond required by subsection (a) or (b) of this section shall be a surety company duly licensed to do business in the State and the bond shall be approved as to form and execution by the City Attorney. d) All bonds required by subsection (a) or (b) of this section, when approved by the proper City or State officers, shall be deposited with the City Clerk. e) All bonds required by subsection (a) or (b) of this section, whether for an "off sale" or "on sale" license, shall be conditioned as follows: 1) That the licensee will obey the law relating to such licensed business. 2) That the licensee will pay to the City, when due, all taxes, license fees, penalties and other charges provided by law. 3) That in the event of any violation of the provisions of any law re- lating to the business which the license has been granted for the sale of intoxicating liquor, such bond shall be forfeited to the City or in lieu of forfeiture at the City's option, and upon agreement of the City and licensee the licensee shall pay to the City an agreed amount up to the total amounts of the bond. 4) That the licensee will pay, to the extent of the principal amount of such bond, any damages for death or injury caused by or resulting from the violation of any provisions of law relating to the business for which such licensee has been granted a license, and further conditioned that such recovery may be had also against the surety on his bond. The amount specified 29 - 10 /8 in any bond required is declared to be a penalty and the amount recoverable shall be measured by the actual damages, provided however, that the surety thereon shall not be liable for any amount in excess of the penal amount of the bond. 5) All such bonds shall be for the benefit of the obligee and all persons suffering damages by reason of the breach of the conditions thereof. Such bonds shall run to the City as obligee, and in the event of a forfeiture of any such bond for violation of the law, the District Court of Ramsey County may forfeit the penal sum of the said bond, or any part thereof, to the City. Code 1965, SS 703.080; Ord. No. 229, SS 3, 9- 26 -67). State law reference - Amounts and conditions of bonds furnished by "off sale" and "on sale" intoxicating liquor licensees, M.S. SS 340.12. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. I NEW BUSINESS (continued) 1. P.E.R.A. Resolution a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. Ayes - all. b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its 84 - 10 - 152 WHEREAS, approximately 113 City of Maplewood employees are members of the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA); and WHEREAS, cities raise property taxes which are contributed to PERA as the employer share of retirement benefits for City employees; and ion: WHEREAS, the Association of Minnesota Counties' trustee on the PERA Board, in conjunction with the League of Cities appointed trustee and other appointed and elected trustees, raised significant questions regarding the appointment process used to hire an interim exective director of PERA; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood supports the actions of the Association of Minnesota Counties' trustee and other members to remove the interim director and to proceed with an open process of selection for PERA executive director. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Legislative Auditor conduct a five year com- pliance audit of the PERA fiscal operations. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Maplewood will not enter into any services offered by PERA (such as life insurance or auto insurance programs) until it is clear that the management of PERA is consistent with good public policy. Seconded by Mayor Greavu.Ayes - all. 2.' Questions by Ted DeZurich - Sprinklers a. Mr. Ted DeZurick, representing Bennington Woods Development, spoke regarding 30 - 10/8 the requirements in appendix E of the State Fire Code pertaining to sprinkling of new construction. b. Mr. Richard Brooks, Director from the State Building Code Division, explained the requirements. c. The following developers expressed their views: Mr. Fred Haas, Marvin Anderson Construction Mr. Greg Schmidt, Castle Design. d. The following Fire Department personnel expressed the need for sprinkling systems: Mr. Don Hove, East County Line Fire Department Mr. Thor Bodsgard, Parkside Fire Department. e. Councilmember Anderson moved that no action on the matter be taken Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - Mayor Greavu; Councilmembers Anderson and Maida. Nays - Councilmembers Bastian and Wasiluk. J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. David Trepanier a. Mr. David Trepanier spoke on behalf of his father Francis Trepanier who owns the dwelling at 2810 White Bear AVenue. The dwelling is being used as a four - plex, but is zoned for R -2 (double dwelling). b. No action taken. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Highwood Avenue a. Councilmember Maida stated she had received another call from Mr. Poppert regarding the pipe under his driveway. b. Staff stated the owner is required to install the pipe himself. 2. Storm Shelters a. Councilmember Anderson commented on culvert construction being used as storm shelters. Mr. Peterson (Rolling Homes Mobile Home Park) is interested in this type of storm shelter. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Council Meeting of November 11, 1984 a. Council changed meeting date of November 11, 1984 (as it is a holiday) to November 8, 1984 at 7:00 P.M. at City Hall. 3. Budget Transfer 31 - 10/8 a. Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve a budget transfer of $1,600.00 from the Telephone Study Account to Elections tor the purchase of wo used voting machines Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. M. ADJOURNMENT 11:20 P.M. City Clerk 32 - 10/8 r MANUAL CHECKS OCTOBER .1.984 P4 7 CHECK REGISTER r 00ouh' 19B4 CITY OF MAPLE WC-00 1 45. 00 K ANE POSE M AR Y P 1R DEDUCT 145.20 CMCCK %(7*CITE 19622.50 275KZ 1 12/84 1 9622050 MAFLELEAF -:'FF UNR IRES 1,622.5"- 275 M1 3 "1L- /12 /84 1 , 622.5Od 275P13 1Z/12/p4 10,866.7'g 275 x+13 1C /12184 306 .J0 MT NN STA :T= TREAS 0ni YERS L :C P DL 11 275M69 1W /12/84 162.0=0 215M69 1 /1 162.0 0 2765n4 "1::/12/84 94 7 C 283.60 2765 66 1 283.!50 126.C`C 0EFWA4QS PROGRAMS 126.IC 2765 b "12/84 9,191 .C1 01 NN S71ATE TREAS MCT CR VEH L'C Pr 292.00 2765 9 1C /12 /Rt 9 ,4 83.01 6 %n_0 276M69 1i/12/F4 6.'' C 2.76M69 1V' /12/8 6,216.78 MINN STATE TREAS MCTCR VAN LIC 373.::0 27755 1.j/12/R4 6,,589.78 1190CD 217Mo9 1U/12/F4 119.' • 277Fo9 1u 12/84 271SC4 C 1u /12/84 P4 7 CHECK REGISTER r 00ouh'VENO0 ITE 0E % - )C ; 1PT :O ?. 1 45. 00 K ANE POSE M AR Y P 1R DEDUCT 145.20 19622.50 VbFLELCAF 1FF UmPIRES 1 9622050 MAFLELEAF -:'FF UNR IRES 1,622.5"-PAPLELEAF OFF ump1P:.S 1 , 622.5Od 10,866.7'g Pl AN STS TZ.- TREAS MCT'R V;.H LIC FCE 306 .J0 MT NN STA :T= TREAS 0ni YERS L :C P DL 11 162.0=0 TAYLORS F_ S CRUISE FROGRAMS 162.0 0 94 MTV LANDSCAPE PROGRAMS 94 7 C 283.60 LORD +FLETZ.MERS FR0GRAMS 283.!50 126.C`C 0EFWA4QS PROGRAMS 126.IC 9,191 .C1 01 NN S71ATE TREAS MCT CR VEH L'C Pr 292.00 MI tiN STAT' TrREA S OGI V= RS, LIC ?OL 9 ,4 83.01 6 %n_0 RAFSyY M f4TY TRA 6.'' C 6,216.78 MINN STATE TREAS MCTCR VAN LIC 373.::0 VI NN STAT' TREAS SRI VEERS LIC FQL 6,,589.78 1190CD CLERK OF COURT CNTY DRI V =RS LI 119.' • 19F4 CITY 3F MA =LEWC»CHECK R.cGIST- R CHECK N.S.DA YE AMOUNT V= ND 0 ITE' N DE So CnIFT_ r 27t F69 1;;/12/84 5,6E4.30 FINN STATE TREAS MOOT OI R VEH L C 278 P69 16 /1 [/ 22R.zC MI K STAT_ TREAS 3RI VERS LICL 5 012.0 0 4 27RU1 1 /12 /34 ,o233.34 L CONTRACTI AG CrNTiACT FYM 34.233.34 t 279C4 1: /12 /F4 S.SG CHLE3'CK JUDY TRAVEL TRAIN 279.047 1 /12/84 1,75 CMLEBrCK JUDY TF.AW'L TRaji ,a 279C47 1„/12/F- 4 5.75 CYLEA.ECK JUDY TRAVEL TPA;%:'4C 279C47 7 /12/ t t 1 CNLEBECK JUDY TRAVEL TI Ait,C 14.50 f 279N6Q 1 #J/12/8 4•'358950 MINN STtAT; TREAS PCTOR VD- L.0 F 219"69 1.62.1 1 STAT_ TRCFAS ONK LIC r-HL 279 MO 9 1 c - /1 21 1.22. J PI Nei STAT_ TREA S DNR L "C r EL 27yN5 275..30 PAINN STA 1:. TREAS DRIVEPS L'C =FL 5 • 2 23. 50 ! 2Y2a'-10 /12/84 335.90 AFSCM=UNT&CN DU-- S PEL 2 2; y 5 1+.j /12 /R4 5.32 AFSC4 ;UNI Cf, OUP S F ?L 341.22 2r2C35 1G /12 /Ay 14.356.50 CITY C NIT Y C UNI I C N CR_ n:T UN PBL 14.356.50 2.2 :1 5 10/12/P4 2.522.72 ICMA CEFERRE:0 COW- 2 10/12/84 5C5.'?4 I C1 DEFERRED CC"' 2 5 1C /12/E4 5 IC M F -FRED COIM 2o2 115 10 /12 /84 5.005.74 ICMA JEF;RRED COP= 3902S.46 2z2F52 1:!/12!84 149 V8•Q8 M?l FEOZiRAL SAVINGS FWT PSL 14.2C.8 1 &2w61 10/12/84 31L.D0 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE PV f 1984 CITY 3F MAFLE.WCOZ)CHECK PEG'STE R CHECK N0.DATE A Pau Wr VENo0R ITEM 3ESCRIrT'pty 31 Ow S t 282! 65 1C /12 7,847931 Pk ST LONM /REVENU_SWT P8L 7 , t 24 2kb 10/1 21F 4 15.7 M4 ST RETTREP'ENT CEFERRED CD1 r 2C' 2 c /94 9.23 FN ST RET'REMr—%T 0 FERRED CCNv 25. 2h2NLQ i / /F4 6.418.25 P'lNN STATr TREAS NCTCR VET LiC ?f 2 2 9 1? 4 353.u0 MI ti STA7L TREAS V =RS LTC FFL 6071.25 2c2M t;:ii /12/ ,64 3.872.79 P STa TE T S/S P9L 262M7 12194 4#x'46.16 M "' STA TREAD S/S ooL 7 + 2c2M75 i /1 t/9 1 650.M TEAMST =RS U I DUBS = =L 651.75 it 21 7o to /12 /Fti 6.56109 25 N STE TE TREAS PFR,PERK PEL 2o2!v76 11 /12/94 f 9 714 *J7 MN ST ATE TREA S PE RA P RA PBL 15,274.32 2x35 7 1u /12/64 1 c 10 M;DWEST ENGINEERS TFAVEL TR Ar.% :t v I On 2o3C25 1u 12/84 19465.63 CANADA LI INSURANCE 1 o4E5.63 f i 2e3M2 1 /12/ 4 119,576. 73 METRO WASTE.SEWER CiHARCFS 119,576.73 Est ti r 213961 13/12/84 171 .43 M% MUTUAL LIFE INSUR ANCE w c 3951 1 /1 "r /? 4 27.1 0 ON MU`l.'AL LIFE INISL'RANCE 2e31v61 7 +/12/84 43.34 MN MUTUAL LIVE INSURANCE 283x61 1.r/12/E4 2.791.0 +0 MN MUTUAL LIFT INSURANCE F4 7 , 9766.32 May MUTUAL LIFE INSUR 1 0 015.19 f t ftt sf 1 vey l i i T J r MA k ZCD CHECK R G Il CHECK NC* DATE. AMOUNT VENDO? ITEM -3,. T. E 3M59 1J /1 21 4012 *89 MINN STAT TREAS r — 2630 1i, /12/F4 M_TOR V:i L..222.3D M; NN STAT 7RE h DRI V? S L iC =- CeJLLECTT ncS CN'TY CRI VIrfS L PCT CR V 1 L; C LR.& VERS L'C TFAVE'L TRAlIN i MrT 0R V c $-i LI Dr: V' S L iC Pa a1S TA 6E G - 'NZ - R AL BC. -13 NY 61 FR SANITARY SEV_& rAYRLL SF'd_F__ 4934.89 Z 4L2i,1 /1218 4 4 R,4 AIR MANAGE. ME kT 45. 0r 2S4C4 1 /12/F4 10 .0050 CLER Of COUR 100.5Ci 264iv69 1 /12/84 8.053302 M11 N STATr. TRE;;S2F4?+69 1? 112 / F 4 2e4 .j D F:NN STATE ASETH 8,334.2 641 5 1 /12/8 4 195 oV .U NTV 3F 1 INNESOTA 195. ? 13 2b5N59 1../12 84 49586,35 M1 AN SF TREASZF51wo91.2 /R4 19 6 * 9 3 MTNY STAT.. TKEAS 4 ?82.35 205c5L 1,;/12/84 2,50' * '0 U.S *POSTMASTER 2950 ?.30 i 122 .508, F 5 rU *,'D 01 TITIL 34.233.34 FUND 5F TOT-AL 1 1 SOM FUND 9C TOTAL 229507.5 FUND 92 TOTAL 298 9 X25.97 TOTAL NECESSARY. EXPENDITURES SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING CeJLLECTT ncS CN'TY CRI VIrfS L PCT CR V 1 L; C LR.& VERS L'C TFAVE'L TRAlIN i MrT 0R V c $-i LI Dr: V' S L iC Pa a1S TA 6E G - 'NZ - R AL BC. -13 NY 61 FR SANITARY SEV_& rAYRLL SF'd_F__ ACCOUNTS PAYABLE w OCTOBER 22,1984 1984 C:TY 3F MAPLEW300 296552 55o00 ASSOC 10F AMER RR CHECK UATt AMOUNT 296 n0 Iii /11lQ4 545.00 296554 1v/11/P4 6.0fl 545.00 BA.RT PAMELA Jo 296091 F - 4 2058987 29558.80 29615L 70G0' 7, 30 296166 1 /? ? / E 4 r 27o nD t iY62?2 1/11/R4 174.92 174.92 # 2 1 /11 /8 120.x,0 120.CD 2965; 3 11/11/84 44.85 44 , 85 t 296511 01b. , 16.00 # 2955 14 84 3.:0 3. ^0 # 295551 1;, /11/84 Page: 1 CO=C REGISTER VENDOR I TE M DES CR 4r p T • M -A-LTH RESOURCE'S CONTRACT Frow SEXTON, PR T NT I AG EKSTRQ ND TH CMAIz FUBLTJH_ TRAV =L TRAIts:p -t; AD VANC1D PAGI AG SERV S£RY' CE FLEXIBLE R-T PE gTCCL E KBLAO oA RDEE PAYETTE JEAN GOODEN LINDA RAPS COUNTY 15.50 AJAX POV!'R BRAKE 15.5 0 • 296552 55o00 ASSOC 10F AMER RR 55.00 2+6553 60.0"0 FELL I rl.0 RIC V 0o9 • 296554 1v/11/P4 6.0fl BA.RT PAMELA Jo SUPPLIES V_rj NOTARY SUP PL: ES BOC REFUND REFUND LIO E MT INS Trt UCT OR REFUUD SUPFLTFS Pe,4c 7 * CHECK REGISTER VENDO? ITEM LESCR ;PT ON ERACKE LOUiS CONTOACT PYM BRADY OFFICE SUPPLIES RRJW'V rTLCRI A P_FUNO CA RLS J'V JA N ICE- REFUND CASs POWE0 EAU:P SLPP C, ;ASE POWER EQUIP SUPPLIESft . COLOR TILE CO Cr.NSOLIDATEO CONT N=R CURT 8 SCNS RADIATOR Dr-LANG'E S GRASS CLTNG DRAKE C +aRLrS FRATTALONE FM JE NNI NGS EL EA NO R JORDANIL BARBARA LAKE'VIUW ASSOC INC LAKEV 76.4 ASSOC INC LAlcEVTEW ASSOC INC MCLS STAR & TRIBUNE MA ER 8AQ3ARA M I NN D 0 CU ME NT C TR SUPPL: rc SUP FLT ES SUPPLIES GRASS CUTTING R!:FUN-9 LCT J'V 6RAD'NG REFUND REFUND CONTRACT PYM CONTRACT Yml CONTRACT RYM SUPPLIES REFUNJ B)^ K 1904 CITY OF MAPLEU30D CHECK N'-"*04%AMOUNT 6.00 296555 1/11/8 810,"fl 810.00 29655E 10/11 E4 2.95 2.95 f. t1 296557 1. /11/E4 16 -13 16. CC 296558 t. 1C` 16.n0 296559 1 11 f E 4 4.7 70 296559 12 9 53 *59 296561 1 /11 /8 4 10.73 10 * t 2965 1: /11/19205 w 192.50 296563 1,: /11 s4 52.0 52. 296564 1C /11 /84 142 0 S Z 14200 2965-55 1C /11 / E4 45 J 45.00 * 2965ob 1 /1118 4 2,41 F*Dg 2941E *0 296567 4 26* 00 26.00 i 296568 1 /11/F4 16 *00 16.D0 t 2v65o S 1v / 1 1 /E4 2, 295 * a0 296569 1 0 /11 f 24 455 *CO - 29656 5 14 /11 /84 258 *00 2,098.90 2y65 7C 1u /11 /F4 11 *21 11.21 26571 1J /11 /F4 iDr 7 *00 296572 10/11/84 7 99 - 6 Pe,4c 7 * CHECK REGISTER VENDO? ITEM LESCR ;PT ON ERACKE LOUiS CONTOACT PYM BRADY OFFICE SUPPLIES RRJW'V rTLCRI A P_FUNO CA RLS J'V JA N ICE- REFUND CASs POWE0 EAU:P SLPP C, ;ASE POWER EQUIP SUPPLIESft . COLOR TILE CO Cr.NSOLIDATEO CONT N=R CURT 8 SCNS RADIATOR Dr-LANG'E S GRASS CLTNG DRAKE C +aRLrS FRATTALONE FM JE NNI NGS EL EA NO R JORDANIL BARBARA LAKE'VIU W ASSOC INC LAKEV 76.4 ASSOC INC LAlcEVTEW ASSOC INC MCLS STAR & TRIBUNE MA ER 8AQ3ARA M I NN D 0 CU ME NT C TR SUPPL: rc SUP FLT ES SUPPLIES GRASS CUTTING R!:FUN-9 LCT J'V 6RAD'NG REFUND REFUND CONTRACT PYM CONTRACT Yml CONTRACT RYM SUPPLIES REFUNJ B)^ K A MpU T.86 54 *0D 54 . r, D t 26.94 26 94 t F 2 -& .,Lr 32,C'no • 138 C. 13R.JL f 7.. 7, 451.52 451.52 20 •DD 20 7 o 7, w 3.C3 3.DD # 27,15 29.56 43.26 7,57 1:)7o54 14o73 14 12.00 442.91 6".r'D 63C 1 f 24o32 77.34 94.66 : 30.34 r w P ` CHECK RE CIST_R 19Lq4 CITY OF MAPS.= WC')D ITEM DESCIr- T` 04 CHECK A0, DATE NTS SUpPL IES 3E'I SON KEN -N, Ttj R E F L'i R. L• PD LK C n 296.5 73 1u /11 /F4 EFLN0 STAC MFG MIST SUPPLIES E TA YLO P P; A IYK 296574 8I r uND YES 8 3 K 29657.5 84 296576 1J /1 1/84 296577 160 /11 /84 2965 7 1;: /11 /84 2965 1rl11/84 2965.8 4 2965,1-%l 1„/1'!/84 t #mot t 296 A 84 296 A . I 1C 184 r296,A 1 1' /7 C/ Q 4 296A 1C /84 296 A- 2 1;. /1C 296A65 1; /ic 1 296 A65 1 /1J/84 2Y6Ati5 1:: X84 296A67 1u / /f4 2960p. 6 7 1 10 184 296822 1r, /1C /8 A MpU T.86 54 *0D 54 . r, D t 26.94 26 94 t F 2 -& .,Lr 32,C'no • 138 C. 13R.JL f 7.. 7, 451.52 451.52 20 •DD 20 7 o 7, w 3.C3 3.DD # 27,15 29.56 43.26 7,57 1:)7o54 14o73 14 12.00 442.91 6".r'D 63C 1 f 24o32 77.34 94.66 : 30.34 r w ACE P ` CHECK RE CIST_R y`'VDCR ITEM DESCIr- T` 04 NY B1TnNICAL GA,DN'S BO NJ ST PAUL DLES NTS SUpPL IES 3E'I SON KEN -N, Ttj R E F L'i R. L• PD LK C n SUPPL i ES St1 A?? S4 VCFd EFLN0 STAC MFG MIST SUPPLIES E TA YLO P P; A IYK Sri A K' R W :BB P AULtTTE r uND YES 8 3 K ACE HDW SUP FLTLSAL=HDi SAti E Rom SUPPLTESACEHDQSU?PL'ES AC RD• MI NA SUPPLIES AQUAZYME MIDWEST AQUAZYME MiDjtEcT AGUAZYME MICWEST CHEMI CAL TtI L`TS CHE M iC AL T0; L:'T S C TOIL7T A a ACHE PA nE R ADACHE PAGER 3.F•G000R'Cf4 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CHEMTCAL TC* L -7TS I f 19$4 CITY OF MAPLE L C3D CHECK R EGTSTER CHECK N! ^4 DATE 4 MDUNT V= ND ITEM DESCRT FT10k 80.34 296E45 1.; /IC/A4 56.28 8C OF MATER CJMM UTILITIES 296P45 1w/10./84 26.74 AOARJ -OF MATER COMM UTILITIES 296E?45 1%J /1EI /4 12912 FOARD OF MATER COMM UTIL1TI_ S 296 e4 5 1 /1E / F4 8.20 SOAP) OF MATER COMM UTILITIES 296E45 1,: /lot E4 12.1, 2 g #ARD OF wATER C)MM UT; LIT IES 115.46 t 2Y6C38 1 u /10 /84 44.55 CLEAM STEP RUGS RUGS CLE' ANI=fl CW3 F 1 '. 11f /F4 44.55 CLE SIEP TUGS RUGS CLE ANZO 89. + 296C5L 1u /1C /F4 24.54 CLUTLH&TQANSMISSION SUPPL._S 24,54 296C52 1r /F4 28.56 CLLTCH U JOINT SUPPLIES 29.56 290 C90 23.76 COUNTRY C!.UB FRGb SU ?ELI =c 23.76 * 296095 1.x/1 4 7.4C CUDE LIRVY SUPPLIES. VE4 T.4- * 296C35 428.00 CALEY PAT PBLG TNSp_CrCR 428.30 296x4 `1:, /10 184 1 654rD D OF PUBLIC SFT1/n_r' :IR M.'1T V 165.wC! ! 296C44 1L{ /1r /E4 1 486.3'DI CTAPHON7 CO REPAIR MA TNT 1 ,9486.10 c cy6C45 n e1v /1 /_4 46.56 TCZSPA C DUBLISHIhG 46.56 sY ; r .s in r PA e 1984 CITY IF MAFL =WCl0 CHECK REG'STr'R CHECK NC.ONTE AMOUNT VENDCR ITEP GE CKIPT , 296E07 1 U /10 /84 29080 EA TMA N KODAK CO CFFICE S LPPL I 29. RC t 296F ^5 1:: /1G 184 M.co FAUST DAN_ EL TRAVEL TP , I'4: 4 , 2 51R 89 FOX VALLEY SUPPLIES 296C1 10 110/84 12^,45 C 8 K SERVICE'S UNIFC'RMS 2 1;r.0 /10 /84 X65 * 35 G 9 K SERVI UNIFORMS 296G1-1C /Ic /8 i 56035W E & K SERVI CE S UNIFORMS 29661+15 /1C I84 64.10 G $ K SErVI Cr Ly1F0RMS 296G Ir 1 /1u /84 63.20 G & K SERV'CE S UNIFORMS 29661 1L /10/84 63.20 C & K SERVICES U "JI FOR MS 296G 1 ;1'; /1C /f 4 43.2>0 6 $ K 6cRVICE S UNIFO?M'S 29b C1'1 / 1 /84 43 .20 G & K SERVICES U''IIFO RMS 296G1 0/8 43 *7-0 G & K SERVICES u IN 1 f 0 R M IS 29601"1G ilc /8 l 43 .?0 G 8 K SEFVL CTS U% 296W 1:: /in IF 43.20 C 8 K SERVICES UNIFORM 2goG1 1L /10' 181 43.?C G & K SERVICES UNIF0RMS 296 G I C 1C /1L/84 43 .?C G 8 K SERV UP'4 :F0 °,MS 2960'!:1 /1C /g4 43.20 G 8 K SERVI CES U!?FCRMS 296GIr_1 /1 I84 43.20 G & K SEp VICES UNIFORMS 296 GI 1:110 /E 43.20 C & K SE °V: CF UhIFoRMs 296G1r 1 /10/84 1 .'"C C & K 6ERVIC=S UNIF3RMS 296G1'-1u/1'J/84 180 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS 296C1r 1 /10/8 C 8 K SERVICES jUNIFaRMS 296G I 1r' /10/E4 1 $s 0 C 8 K SERVICES ustiiF3RM S 29601[1u /1G'/84 18.20 G 8 K SERVICES UNI FIRMS 841.95 * 296043 1 L /11; /8 4 96.88 GMC TRUCK CENTER SUPPLIES 96.F8 * 2 10/1C/C4 1000'GFh =RAE TIRE S. ?V SUPPLIES 10'._3 296045 1u /1C /84 6 .50 GOIDYEAR TIRE CC SUPPLIES VEH 29bG 1i /1L 184 6.50 V00DY,:AR TIRE CO SUPPLIES VE 13.00 296G46 1/1C/84 3.R3 GENUIti= PARTS SUPPLIES 2SO G4 t 117 /1C /E4 37.37 GCNU'EN CARTS SUPPLIES 296G46 10 /1G/84 34.15 PARTS SUPPLIES 296G46 1J I1G /84 33.34 GENUI NE PARTS SUPPLIE%. a PA T 1984 CITY -IF MAPLE6JID CHECK k =G.ISTER CHECK *SO'.DATE AMOUNT VEN00:ITEM DESCAI°'r 3` 108.69 s :f tt i 2Y6 C6^1:: /1C /64 8.0 GR LRERS HDJ H ANK SUPPLIES 296S6C 1J /1D /8 5.78 GRUEERS PDW HANK SUPPLIES 296 G6 r•1C /10/8A 24o DO nLBERS HDW HANK SUPPLIES i7 F0 f 296t-24 1 /1C /84 30 01 HEAP RENTALS . NC RENTAL O 2y6F36 1J' 111?4 HILLCR ANIMA.AhiMAL CCNTR!-L 4D.CD t :tf 296P3F la /1C /ti4 1 b0•HTLLCPEST ELECTRIC SUa?LIrS 16 D f 296w4"1 fl J /b 4 97-HI LLCRDIST GLASS SUPPLIES 296 r4 17* 77 HI LL',-% GLASS SUPPL :ES 16.E 0 29 r5:1C /10/F4 11.13 f- DLIDAY SUPpL7Ec 11.13 f 29 6.1: /' ^ /F 74.51 INC NDrNT #522 SUPPLIES 74.51 296'T 7r is /1C, /F4 52,65 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY SUPPLIES 296'7C 11 /1C /84 51•I!NCUSTR-IAL SUPPLY SUPPLIES 52.15 29bIbC 10/10/84 126.' -6 ITASCA EQUIP SUPPLIES VEw 126.R6 + 296Ib6 1J11W8 93 *00 TNTL RUSYNESS MACH SUPPLIES t 93.00 t 9 . 7 1994 CITY 3F MAFLEh C00 CHEC REG: ST =R CHECK NO D•. T =MA VENDL °,ITE DESCRI 296I9 1,110/84 24.90 INTL CONF BLDG OFLS BOOKS 2400 • 296J3C 202.50 JW TROP4 ES TP.GPHIES 22.53 296J32 1 L /1 C/ F 4 233.65 J.L. SHI E. Y Cl REC R CCK 233.65 296J35 IL/10/84 92.78 J &V HtTCH SALES SUFPL7E 92.78 296L1 f 1. /'C /P 4 4039.10 LA IS q'ANAI GAN KLY LEG AL 29 1 : /10 /Ey 1. 10442.25 LAIC SANN'74GA*1 KLY LEGAL 29606 1;; /1C /F 102 LA IS 9ANNIGAN KLY LEGAL 29606 13/1C/F4 67.50 LASS RA.IINTGAN KLY LEGAL 6 296L19 1.'/10/R4 47.50 LAKE SAN .TATION RL38ISH 2ybL1 S 1 /10/s4 13 .50 LAKE SANITATION RUBEISH R,MOI,I 185.'?n 296 L21 1 _ /1G /Q ._ 4 11. _6 L AK E'LAND FORD SUPPLIES V= H 296L21 1:. /10 /R 4 7, 62-LA KELA HD FORD S UP P L /ES VEH 296LZ1 1i, /1Cl 7.62 LA FORD SUP PL :FS VEy 296L21 10/F4 20.82-LAKELANJ FORD SUPPLE%VCH 296L21 16 /1L'/84 23.92 LAKELAND FORD SUPPL ES 11.x.6 ! 296136 1"/10184 7.62 LwES AUTO SUPPLY SUPPLIES VEH 296L3E 1 /1Q /F4 4.99 LEES AUTC SUPPLY SUPPLIES VEH 2Y6L3o 1U/'!0 /84 22.36 LEE'S AUTO SUPPLY SUPPL'ES.VEH 296136 1';i /lo/F-4 48.60 LEES AUTO SUPPLY SUPPLIES VEH 296L36 1 /10/F4 2(;.52 LEES AUTO SUPPLY SLPPL.ES VEH 104.39 296L75 50.19 LO LK T -1ACTOR SUPPLIES WEH r / 19F4 CITY OF MAFL-wC .)3 CMEC N09 DA TE 296L75 1; /1C /F4 2Y605 10/IC/84 NJRTHW'LSTF"R A E'LL 2960,5 10/10/84 296L S E 1 ; 11C /E4 i #ii t P =LL 2561114 1 /1• I F 4 290 t 14 1C 184 29611 1;, /1 /E4 296M17 1 J 10 84 2 *1610 4 10 / 84 litf•t 2Y6P197 fi * *it 296N3C 296N3L 1C /1C /8 4 296 s15 C 1 J /1 1 l 84 296!t5 E4 c96%5^1i'/11 /A4 296W 1i /11/F4 296 N, .) C 11:; /11 /84 2Y6N5 10/11/84 296N5 1L /11 /84 2965+„1184 256N5-10 /11 / 4 290 N5 0 11/84 AM©UN'r 7.35 17.50 74. 72.3, 72.'":Q t 89.70 89.70 f 135,36 20* 14 . 3 169.52 197.1 190. 71 3,1 60. 20 3 9160* ?D • 8.3010 108. on t 1 94 36. R3 53.10 1 •489.90 2300 36a 90 38 0 359.01 19.57 39.00 33.90 67.9 2 5 81.80 7 96.31 : P • flCy CH =CK R EGI STi R YE'N04? ITEM DESCRIP TION LONG LIK TRACTOR SUP PL 7 ES VE14 LONG LK TRACTOR SUPFLIES VEH LUOER LUMBER LUXIN STiV: SUPPLIES VE=T SUFFLTLS V-P PIPLE'WO REV; :W M«LE WOOD RV. Dd MAPLE400C REViEW PANDO P#40T^ MsTR^ INSP SERVICE YS ICI CO NIRTH ST PAUL CITY NORTH ST DA UL CITY Kf?RTI WEST = N 13- N0RTHiiEST= R A BELL f.0RTHWE STIR &e_ LL NIFTMWEST R N 8 -LL NJRTHW'LSTF"R A E'LL NORTH WE:S 77 P N BILL NO RTHW E STFR A P_ LL hORTNWESTER N P =LL AO ESTER h FELL ACnTtM RN BILL PUB L'S H'rNG FURLIsh Nr- SUPS%R IPT!sy LPPLTES V =4 ELECTRICAL I NSP SUPPL ES UTI LIT I. S UTIL.TTEs TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TE'LEPSCNE TELEPHONE' TELEPHONE TEL EPHON E T 'LE'PH0NE. TELEPHONE Tr.LtPH0NE TrLEP ION E 11 le 4 e : C#J =CK R EEG 1ST; R VEN002 ITE r. DESCRIP T! 0' A!*sop UTI LI TIE S hose .U TIT LTIES 1y•%,P. 19F - t4 CITY F MAPLr— 6JO UTILITIES 11.5. ?.UTILITIES h. ?.UT1L"I TIE II.S.Q. CHECK %.I*04 TE AMOUNT 110S0 P0 UT;,LI.TIEx- E 296h5 % 1 + :1 / 11 / A 4 2.40 296%1 /11 /84 2.40 29W C 1i /11 /P 4 3.53 296N 1 L /11 / 84 452 •T7 296h,1 /11 /84 92.76 296!'gC 1C /11 /p4 72.21 296r h 1C /11 / 4 5.20 296N 1 ' /11/94 9.R2 296 N' C 1 1/ F_ t 356 1 ?69. -7 2y6%95 1w /10 /E+t 6.00 6.00 • 2960 t_ /IC 154 13. L 13.73 296P3 1u /10/84 2,075. ^0 2 , 9075.30 296 F52 1:: 119 /E4 10.36 10.36 f 296Fo7 f4 76.5C 76.5 f 296F.27 t. /1C /E 2y6P9C 1.. /1C /F4 54. 54.'_' 5 t 2 1J /1Ci /5 3.15 2Y6 S 2 1;; /1G /84 2.' 0 5.25 296SC5 1:: /10/p4 14.31 f 4 e : C#J =CK R EEG 1ST; R VEN002 ITE r. DESCRIP T! 0' A!*sop UTI LI TIE S hose .U TIT LTIES 1y•%,P.UTILITIES 5.?0 UTILITIES 11.5. ?.UTILITIES h. ?.UT1L"I TIE II.S.Q.UTI LT TIE S l.S•'.UTILI TIES 110S0 P0 UT;,LI.TIEx- E NUTSSON LAVERNE TRAV =L TRA1'4;..", C -LSON GEGFF TRAVEL TR1.Z'.G PETEISON BEL6. C3NV RETAINER POLAR CHEV SUPPLIES VEH FPCFESSICINAL V#?OCESS APE BILLINGS REEDS SAL= S SER11 CE SUPPLIES PYCO SUPPLY CO SUPPLIF: SbC LOCK &SAF' SUPPL S90 LWCK & SAFE SUPPLIES S a T OFF !CE OFFICE SUPPL V 1984 CiTY OF MAPLEV43D CHECK REGISTE-R CHECK N -l.DATS YE N0 "I 296 S ^5 1 1n /F4 S & 2965 ^5 1 M. /F 1 SUFPLIS 2965 ^5 1 /1C IF4 T OFFICE 296S'5 11 /10/84 18C .'? I 296 5 7f5 1 L11 In / F 4 OFF I C 296 SC5 1 /10 /84 S 9 296S05 10' /10 /8 SUPPL:- S 2965n5 1 /10 /F 4 Y OFFICE 296Sn5 1L /1C /F4 34.08 296 S. '5 1 1w /10184 OFF?CE 296S 5 12 /jC 1 F 4 S & 296Sn5 1 /10/84 SUFPL c 2 ^1 / 3 /F T OFFICE 2965 C5 1i /10 F4 6.79 2965 ^5 10 /1C /F4 OFF 1C_ 296,1.j /1C /t4 S 8 296SC5 1Jl10 /F4 SUrPL 1 S 296 SC 5 10 /1Ct / F 4 T OFFICE OFFICE SLR -PL1-S 1 296555 T 0FF.1 OFFICE SUPPL -S 53.1$ 296S5 IFFICE SUPPLI.. 2Y6 S 9 T OFFICE 296 S5 1v/1 ^134 t 296S5P Iw /10 1 F4 OFFICE 296 S5 F 1/ 1`/ 8 4 S 9 T OFFICE OFF: CE SUPPL= c 29657 C 1 s /1n /S 4 T OFFICE FILE CAS kET 518.7 3 296T29 1.:/131F4 F_L E C AS I NET 2 296 1 /1G /84 RA7I^SUPPL!ES 296765 1 u /1C /84 296 T6 5 10 11C 184 ST -PAUL CITY CF R01U MAi1T 283, ' 5 ST PAUL C T OF R.:0?0 MA 14T V CHECK REGISTE-R AMOUNT YE N0 "I ITEM DESCR`FT'" 28•F S &T OFFICE OFFICE SUFPLIS 3.44 S 8 T OFFICE CFFTCE"3UFPLI.S 18C .'? I S 8 T OFF' CE OFF I C S UP PL 1. S 5.57 S 9 T OFF CV L"FFTCE SUPPL:- S 9.6^So &Y OFFICE CFFTC .SLFPL I .-_S 34.08 S 8 T OFFICE OFF?CE SUPPI =S 83.40 S &T OFFICE FFIC=SUFPL c 13.20 S 8 T OFFICE OFF ICE SUFFL 6.79 S &T OFFICE OFF 1C_S LFPL? c 54.94 S 8 T OFFICE OFF IC=SUrPL 1 S 73.43 8 T OFFICE OFFICE SLR -PL1-S 1 S 9 T 0FF.1 OFFICE SUPPL -S 53.1$S $T 3FF1C'E IFFICE SUPPLI.. 75.41 S 9 T OFFICE 0FFICEP'S PL:7SS' 73.43 S &T OFFICE OFFICE SUF PL I: S 54.94 S 9 T OFFICE OFF: CE SUPPL= c 833.40 S &T OFFICE FILE CAS kET 518.7 3 S&T O FI CE F_L E C AS I NET 2 4GO.r - 'O Sp"!-*CIALTY RA7I^SUPPL!ES 153935 ST -PAUL CITY CF R01U MAi1T 283, ' 5 ST PAUL C T OF R.:0?0 MA 14T 16. nn ST P4 UL C; TY OF RAG' 0 MA I NT 56.0 ST PAUL. CITY OF R M &A 'N' T 84 *10 ST PAU CITY CF RADIO MA: NT 480 553.41 STANDARD SPC ALIGN REMA:R MAINT 9= 553.4'1 4 j 40C.03 T. A•S CNTFS KY SONS CVNTF. AC T ':YM 4*4CO•0n : 987 .*fin T.E.LE - T`RM1 NALS OCT MA iNT 981.00 + 64.93 TKCA CNTP ACT PYM 29C58.57 TKCA CCNIRACT FYH 2.123.50 65.270* 69 TOTAL INDICATES ITEMS FINANCED BY RECREATIONAL FEES FW 1984 C I'Y OF HAFL =WCJD CHECK RESIST =R CHECK {'sou•D-4 AMOUN V thE N ITEM DESC.RIPT.&0% O276T 5 1 /F1u / ? _ 4 3 0.39 T WIN CITY HOW SUPPL I .. ES 2Y6T95 1 / 1^ /$4 169* 0 TWIN C?TY HDW SUP?LSES 199.39 29 1 /10/84 74o70 UNIVERSAL ME'D.ICAL ED SUPPLIES 74.23 290 V5 r 610?0 V1 RTU= PQ7IT1 SU 61 .71 f 296 WZ1 1 L /1 C /84 10010 WARMER'S TRU _ VALU SUPPLIES 296U21 1 /1C /84 10.24 WAFNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIE'S 296W21 lb /'iC /E4 23.63 WARNERS T?UE VALU SUP PL_rS 2 21 1; / 1C /84 I IvC"4 WA =RNr- RS TG UE VALU SUPPLIES 296W21 1u /13/E4 11,64 WARNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 66.65 25665''t6i /1[ /F4 4C4 *16 UEBrR TRiSETH INC SUPPLIES 2y6i5 1:; /in /R4 1 3•LJ wFQER- TRt"'ETO IN"SUPPLIES 41706 2296 W64 1 /1n /g 4 10 •251 .35 WHITE B= Al D3 ^6E VEHICLES 2*6664 1./1C X84 10*251.35 WHITE BEAR DDCGE VEHICLES 290W64 1:; /1C /14 10,vZ51.35 WHITE BEAR 0 VFHICLES 296 664 10/10 109251.35 WH:TE BEAR DODGE V= HICLES 41 v005. 40 2961%9 1 /1'x/84 16.18 W it GRAINGER SUPPLIES 296W9L 1 /101E4 31.26 Y V GRtT&j SUP PLTES 47.44 T1 , 8 4g. R C FUNI 01 TOTAL GENERAL 01 . Tst FU40 33 TOTAL HYDRANT Cf-AD Gt 79`!51 * 65 FUND 11 TOTAL PARK DEVELV NT 2 9123, 50 FU40 39 TOTAL 84.4 MCC LELLANO 1 9442.25 FU40 47 TOTAL 78 -1 J HILLWO-n 3 102 *1 5 FUND 5^ TOT 4L 8.24 B' Af A /W. 67.50 FU KID 75 TOTAL 92 -09 FROST /P= Nt. 379.3Z3 FUND 9J TV' AL SANITARY SEWER F 1 FUND 96 TOTAL VEHICLE & EWL:P 65.270* 69 TOTAL INDICATES ITEMS FINANCED BY RECREATIONAL FEES CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL- CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8019 CHECK DATE 10 4005w84 PERIOD ENCING 09 -28.84 PAGE 2 i DEPT -N4 EMPL•NO EMPLOYEE NAME CHECK•N0 AMOUNT CLEARED 0042 4 774 x1364 ARNOLD DAVID L 1001 -00029 321.19 f 0042 411402115 ATCMTSON JOHN H 1QG1- 0030 711049 t 0042 476721577 BANICK Jo"N J 1001 -00031 512031 t 0042 47168 741 8 BERG'R ON J03ERN A 1001 - 00032 496.50 t OU42 472721660 eOHL JOHN C 1001 - 00033 507069 t 0042 469689867 BOWMA RICK A 1001.00034 649.66 t UU42 469461930 CLAUS ON DALE K 100 1 -flU r 35 76103 t 0042 476446119 CREGER RICHARD C 100.1 -00036 795.33 t 0042 47026788?GQEEN NORMAN L 100 1-&00037 672.'9 t 0042 469568516 ifALWE9 KEVIN R 100.1 -03038 562.76 t 0042 4 ?36^ 4916 NERBER71 MICHAEL i 1001- +t3O039 584.84 0042 472222231 KORTUS 03NALO V 1001 0.00 t X 0042 471563591 LANG RIC4ARO J 1.001.00041 579.79 t 3042 4 764013f38 LEE R OGER Y 1001 -00042 668.77 t UU42 474607686 MEEHAN• JR JAMES E i 001- 00043 704.77 t 0042 469442063 MOES HTER RICHA M 100 1-40 044 271001 t 0042 476340990 MORELLI RAYMOND J 10.01 - 00045 566.29 C U042 4 634.6288 4 PELTI ER WILLIAM F 1001-00146 686.09 t 0042 471564801 RYAN MICHAEL P 1001 -00047 65.3.42 t 0042 470520457 SK ALMAN DINA LD Y 1001 -OJ048 376.52 OU42 473548226 STAFNE GREGORY L 1001.00049 711 •C2 t JU42 471721204 STEFFEN SCOTT L 1001 - 710050 31605 t 0042 471500251 STILL VERNON'T 1001 -00051 698 0042 471629204 STOCKTON DERRELL T 1001.00052 770.20 t 0042 471602052 THCMALLA 0AVT0 J 1001 -00053 505.88 t 0042 415 363333 WILLIAMS "DUANE J 1001 -00054 47702 0042 474260130 ZAPPA JOSEP"A 1001- 00055 7379C4 t 0042 tS X297.62 * 0043 475548434 BECKER RONALD 0 1001m00056 285.64 t 0043 469441789 GRAF DAVID M 1001.00C57 635.89 0043 469820466 HEINZ STEPHEN J 1001 - 130058 786.88 t 0043 3 92 760009 KARTS FLINT D 1001 -00059 118.49 t U043 473567791 MELANDER JON A 1001- aOt160 66.65 .-t.. 0043 468363918 NELSOY CAROL M 1001 -00061 892.76 t OU43 4 ?1504316 RAZSKAZOFF DALE E 1001 -00062 700.89 t 0043 474486371 VORWEPK ROBER*E 1001 "00063 285.29 r 0043 469502201 YOUNGREiN JAMES 6 1001 -00064 419.38 t 0043 4* 191.87 • 0045 471401818 EMBEftTSON JAM M 1001 -00065 714.65 t 0045 472242227 SCNADT ALFRED C 1001 -fl0066 789.12 t 1 0045 1 9503.77 s 0046 468401899 CAHANES ANT'MONY G 1001.00067 78.12 t 30.46 47762 ?236 FLAUGHER JAYME,L 1001 - 00068 462.30 t 0046 3767098?3 MADELL RAYMOND M 1001 -00069 451.04 t 0046 473807030 MARTIN SHAWN 14 10t]1.00G70 447.64 t i C?TY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLLwCNECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8019 CHECK DATE 10 -05.84 PERIOD r` a• ENDING 09.2$•84 PAGE 3 DEPTmNO EMPL•NO EMPLUYEE NAME CHECK•NO AMOUNT CLEARED 0046 4 72 36 5919 NELSON KAR E h A 1001 -OJ L71 4 53. 68 t I 0046 468600183 RABI NE JANET L 1001 -,0072 451.04 0046 477700322 STAHNKE JULIE A 1001 -COC73 372.78 t 0046 2 716.6.0 0051 471440267:BARTA MAR c"L 100 -fl0074 241.90 t DOS 1 4735668Y2 HA IDER KENNETH G 1001 -00075 60018 t 0051 504433174 WEGWERT"JUDITH A 1001 -03076 361.82 t 0051 663,90 • 0052 4 9630 8314 CASS WILLIAM C 1031 -00 1177 658.55 t 1 0052 471526254 FREBERG RONALD L 1001.00078-392.54 t 1 0052 502544337 I-ELEY RONALD J 1001- 00079.606.26 t 1 f 0052 4 71 501241 KANE MICHAEL R 100100080 400.69 t J 0052 469 3634? 3 KLAUS TNG HENRY F 1001 -JA 081 4 76.79 t 0052 475671431 LUTZ .DAVID P 1001- C(-) f82 464.98 0052 4715(30547 PEVER GERALD W 1001 -00083 456.11 t 1 0052 4 7690 450.0 CSWA LD ER I C K D 1001 -Oo 084 0000 t X I 3052 468/66755 PRETTNER JOSEPH 8 1001.00(785 810.64 t I 0052 472241484 REINERT EDWARD A 1001.130 X86 628.32 t 0052 470 346 224 TEVL.I N* JR HA RR Y J 1001.00 0 87 6 36.86 t 1 3052 475589777 ZAPP44 JAMES M 1001 -00088 0.00 t X 0052 5,53 i 053 472683970 AML•JR.RAY C 1001 -00089 817.80 t I 0053 472481010 ELIAS JAMES G 1001.00090 671.74 t 1 0053 167246109 GEISSLEIR M __ ..._ HALTER''M 1001 -00091 604.93 t 7 0053 5 014 64671 GESSE LE JAMS S T 1001m03092 797.51 t 0053 475441688 PECK DENNIS L 100 Iva 00093 545.85 t 0053 472662522 PRIEBE IIILLIAM 1001- 00094 506.14 t 1 0053 3 X94 3.97 ! 0054 4 73683 775 LOFGRE N JOHN R 1001.00095 407.92 t 005 407.92 1 0058 471562563 BR E"E IM ROGER M 1001mC0096 527.80 t 1 0058 477602582 EDSON 0AV''D 8 1001 -DOC97 586, 32 E 0058 470541590 MULW E GEOR W 1001- 00098 487.20 t I 0058 4715il13 14 NADEAU EDWARD A 10014000 ^99 526.31 t 1 0058 468361720 NUTESON LAVE "RNE S 1001 4000100 472..25 t 1 0058 471365993 OWEN GERALD C 1001 -00101 580.95 t 0058 39180.83 * 0059 476249760 MACDONALD ic"N E 1001 -00102 502.32 t 0059 475501000 MULV4NEY DE'NNTS M 1001 -00103 690.46 t I 0059 1 , 19 2.78 • r. CITY OF MAPLE WOOD PAYR OLL•CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8019 CHECK DATE 10.05.84 PERIOD ENDING 09.28.84 PAGE DEPT -NO E4PL•NO EMPLOYEE NAME CHECK- N1 AMOUNT CLEAREO 0063 475826712 hA RPEP.JAMES 1001f00149 0. 00 t x 0063 474847'811 HE TMER L CAROL 1001.00 150 0000 t x 0063 476636996 hE ROE KA RI N J 1001- 0015.1 0000 t K 0063 4 73 9OP715 HOLLI NGSWORTH LISA 1001 -•0? 152 0 x 0063 4708!1144 JOHNSON JOSEPH A 1001 - -00153 0000 t x 9063 469816100 JOHNSON TERE SA L 1001 -00154 0 •U0 t x 0063 469862099 KANE KAREN 1001 -00155 0000 t x 0063 477680548 K IELS A KAKI J 100100156 O.CO t x 3063 47674353 KLASSEN SUSAN 1001 -00157 0000 c x 0063 4 74 74 391 5 K OPT U JAMES M 1001 -00158 0.00 t X 0063 468984615 KRUMMEL BECKY J 1001 -01159 0.00 t x 0063 472484219 LE CLAIR MARY L 1001- 03160 0000 c x 0063 472880498 LOEF= LER CAROL J 1001 -00161 150.00 t 0063 473269324 MAC DONALD ELAINE_'E 1001 -00162 0000 t x 0063 4?692 3936 MAC GILL JJSEP4 M 100 1- 03163 o.c0 t x 0063 473704729 MAHRE MICHELE A 1001 -00164 0.00 t x 0063 4!''.926903 MESSI N KATHLEEN M 1001 - 00165 0•CO t x 0063 474966150 MIWcL ICH CTND I L 1001 -00166 0000 t X 0063 469583307 NISKA JANET A 1001.00167 O.GO t x 0063 47474 5123 NOESE N CR IS TIN A 1001 -00168 0000 c x 1 0363 473565927 OLSON R OBERTA J 1001- 00169 2 80, 66 063 472808158 PACGETTI MARCIE 0 1041- 00170 0.00 t x 0063 46984 F10 5 PE' ARSON LESLIE A 100 1.00171 0• CO t x 0063 472941928 PELTIER MICMiAEL R 1001- 00172 0.00 _t X 0063 46882776.3 RAOA MICHAEL F 1OC1 -00173 0000 t X 0063 3966 '491 9 ST NNI GE SARAN J 10C 1.00174 0000 t x 0063 477869067 SPANK 9RUER DAWN M 1001.001.75 0000 t x 0063 469945370 SPANVBNUER EVA C 100.1 -00176 0000 t x 9063 469742645 SPANNBAUER KATHLEEN G 1001- Or1177 0.00 t x 0063 4 7484 5176 SPANNR AUE R MARTIN'J 1001.00178 0001)t ..X w.. ... _.....r.._. _.. _ ...._.. a . 00.63 469965435 SPANNBAUER SUSAN L 1001 -00119 0000 c x 0063 47P920170 STRAJS LAURA J 1001 00180 0000 t x 0063 476861186 SULLI VVN JULIE 100 1-000 181 O. c0 t x 0063 471823921 SZUR_ K JOANN M 1001 -03182 0.00 t x 0063 4 73 62 6422 Tit U81 AN DOUGLAS J 1001- -03183 594.06 t 0063 47` 963203 WALLACE JrN T 1001•C0IS4 0 t X 0063 396 324246 1A.ARD ROY 6 1001.00185 2 78.31 t 0063 4 7460 6610 Z NN WILLIAM A 1001- e00186 0000 t x 0063 1 X37`6.11 f 0064 151440508 GREW JANET M 1001 -00187 524.20 t 0064 4 713 84624 NORSV ELL JUDITH A 1001 -00188 258.57 t 0364 474542163 SOUTTER CHRISTIN 1001.00189 300.171 t 0064 110082078 0071 389449 C NLEB rCK JUDY M 1 OCR I -00190 357.20 t 3.071 415502485 MISKELL NANCY J 100 1 - 00 191 0000 t x Jfl71 4 73 540551 OLSON 6EOFFREY W 1001 -Oa 192 802.86 t 0071 1 o1 60.06 • S. 5 j go CITY OF MAPLE WOOD PAYROLL-CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8319 CHECK GATE 10 -05 -84 PERIOD ENOING 09.28 -84 PAGE 6 DEPT -NO EMPL• NO EMFLOYDE NAME CHECK• AO AMOUNT CLEARED 0072 47 76 2717 9 EK STRA ND THOMAS G 1001-W193 650.11 t I 0072 475608505 JOHNSON RANDALL.L 1001 -00194 530.56 0072 1 , 180.67 i 0073 476090677 OSTROM MARJCRIE 1001 -00195 812.29 t 0073 812.29 • 0074 3 87520 776 WE NG_ R ROBERT J 1001 -00196 560.27 t 1 0074 560.27 COUNT 01196 GRAND TOTAL 609 680.35 j go k, pow RESOLVED, that the City Council of Maplewood,Minnesota, accepts the following l i s t of Election Judges for the 1984 General Election,Tuesday, November 6,1984: Precinct #1 Precinct #7 Action by Eleanor Mathews Margaret Wo l sion Endorsed,Lorraine Schneider Myrtle Ma lm Precinct #11 F l orence Ste 11 a Betty Haas Modi.." ed Agnes Allen Esther Dollerschel Rejected -. Idamae B ieb i ghauser Arne l 1 a Podgorsk i Date Helen Jean Dickson Sharon Giel Joan Cottrell Precinct #2 Precinct #8 Kathy Supan Pat Thompson Jean Myers Audrey Duellman Evelyn Axdahl Betty Berglund Linda Pr i gge Kathleen Dittel Lorraine Fischer Orpha Getty Bea Hendricks Rita Frederickson Karen Burton Mildred Houck Marilyn Cunningham Anna Fox Precinct #3 Precinct #9 Barb Leiter Mary Johnson Doris Broady Delores Mallet Yvonne Bell Margaret McDonald Alice Miller Paul Arbuckle Irene Anderson Katherine Moore Charlene Arbuckle Theodore Haas Precinct #4 Precinct #10 Caroline Warner Anne Fosburgh Joyce Lipinski Mary Lou L i eder Marjory Tooley Dorothy Arbore Betty Eddy Pat Werden Jack .Arbuckle Diane Golask i Charlene Knutson Precinct #5 Precinct #11 Elsie Wiegert Delores Lofgren Emma Klebe Maxine Olson Sibbie Sandquist Shirley Luttrell Phyllis Erickson Karen Boget- Abrahamson Joyce Schmidt Sigrid Hart Lynette Leonard Joan Cottrell Precinct #6 Precinct #12 Kathy Supan Mary Libhardt Gunborg Mowchan Audrey Duellman Sandy Jones Delores Fastner Linda Pr i gge Mildred Dhen Joanne Houghton Orpha Getty Judy Widholm E•3 wmnRANniiM To: City Manager From: Doug Taubman !DV Re: Budget Transfer Date: October 15, 1984 Action by Councyl; Endorsed, Modii'ied_.._ Rejected, I have been able to make arrangements to have North East Soccer Association (NESA) issue checks to the soccer officials for our Fall Soccer Program. By having NESA issue the checks, we save the City the work and expense involved in the issuing of over 80 checks to approximately 45 to 50 officials. However, to facilitate this arrangement we must reimburse NESA for the checks they issue to officials., To do this we should transfer the $7,700 budgeted in 01- 4020 - 208 -63 to 01- 4480- 208 -63. This transfer will get the monies from the Wages account into Fees for Services. Thank you t t MEMORANDUM fiction by TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Communi Development SUBJECT: Code Amendment - -M -1 District codified DATE: September 10, 1984 . - _- w Reject-ed.... Date Request Approve an amendment to the M -1 district. Reaso for the Request The M -1 district was adopted in 1965 and needs updating. Most of the changes are techni cal , but the following are of substance: 1. Section 36.- 186(a) requires all BC, business commercial uses to be approved by the council. This has been changed to only require approval of BC uses that are on property des i gn.ed for LSC, limited service commerical or RM, residential medium density use on the land use plan. Approval would be by conditional use permit. 2. Exterior storage yards have been changed from permitted to condi- tional uses. 3., Section 36 -188, requiring council approval of all site .pl ..has been deleted. The community design review board does this. Recommendation Approval of the enclosed ordinance. BACKGROUND The comprehensive plan (p. 18 -31) defines the LSC and SC classifications as follows: Limited Service Commercial Center (LSC). The limited commercial center classification refers to commercial faci l i ti es on a neighborhood scale. Heavy industrial uses, department stores, motels, auto accessory stores, etc. would be prohibited, while other land uses of a medium intensity nature would be permitted subject to meeting certain performance standards. Service Commercial Centers (SC). This commercial classification is oriented to facilities which are local or community -wide scale. While a full range of commercial uses is permitted in this district, certain types of facilities which may be of a high - intensity nature, such as fast food restaurants, discount sales outlets gas stations, and light industrial uses, should be permitted subject to specific performance guidelines. The objective of establishing this distract is to provide for a wide variety of commercial uses, compatible with the character and development of the neighborhoods in which they are located. Procedure 1. Planning commission recommendation 2. City council holds a public hearing and considers first reading 3. City council considers second reading Jw Attachment ordinance ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REVISING AND UPDATING THE DISTRICT THE MAPLE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS Section 1.: Division 9 is hereby amended as follows (additions are under- lined and deletions are crossed out): DIVISION 9, M -1 LIGHT MANUFACTURING DISTRICT Sec. 36 -186. Permitted uses. IR M 1 L4ght- Maeufaetar} Rg- 84str} ets ;- a-be44d4Rg- FRay- be- ereeted - used - and a - }et fay -be- used- er- eeeap}ed- fer- aRy -ef- the- fe44ew4Rg- parpeses and -Re- ether; The following uses are ermi tted in the ' M -1 District provided that, no use which is noxious or hazardous shall be permitted: a) Any use listed as a permitted use in a BC Business and Commercial Di.stri ct, and - SG- Shepp4hg- EeRter -84 }Et -4f- the- eewRe44- 4s- sat4sf4ed that - sweh- use- w4ll- eet }rterfere -w4th- peeper- devele feRt -ef- the -M -1- L ght- 4afaEterg`8str et;- bat - yet- etherwse- if the property is not desi nated for LSC Limited Service Commercial or RM Residential Medium density use on the cit 's.com rehensive lan. b) Wholesale business establishments. c) Trucking yard or terminal. d) Custom shop for making articles or products sold at- reta44 on the premises. e) Plumbing, heating, air conditionin glazin painting , paper-p p p hanging, roofing, ventilating and electrical contractors, blacksmith shop, carpentry, sold and or welding shop. f) Yard fer steragey- sale- and- d4str }but}ep- ef- 4ee ; - eeal fae4 -e44 er- bw41d4Rg- Ffiater4a4s: Printer's shop, g) CeRiFAere4a4 Place of amusement, recreation or assemblyy h) Bottling establishment. i) Manufacturing assembly or p ocessi ng of : as 444ews= i) Canvas and canvas products. II) Clothing and other textile product ; - ret- 4Re4ed4Rq maRafaetare ef- text }des. III) Electrical equipment, appliances and supplies, manufaetare and-assembly-efy-net-4nelwd4n9 except heavy electrical machinery, IV) -Food products, eefbiR rig- er - preeesslRg -ef ; - Ret lReladlhg exce t meat, 'paur tg --and - or fish. V) Jewelry, clocks or watches. VI) Leather products;- 4 RE1ed4ng- 1a9gage- and- shees: VII) Medi cal , dental or drafting equipment, optical goods. VIII) Musical instruments. IX) Perfumes, pharmaceutical products, eefpewnd4Rg -ef rubber products and synthetic treated fabrics, het- lREladlRg bbe- and- syRhetE- preEeaslRg X) .Small products from the following previously prepared materials: Cork, feathers, felt, fur, glass, hair, horn, paper, plastics or shells. XI) Sporting goods. In 1) 414 Tool dye and pattern making, and or similar small machine shops. XIII) X114 Wood products 4Relad4Rg- farR4tare- and- bexe5. j) Carpet and rug cleaning. k) Laundry, dry cl or dyeing plant. 1) Laboratory, research, experimental and or testing. m) Offices -as- the- prlRelpal -ase. n) school o) warehouse n4--ARy -use-ef-t.he-saFse- geReral -eharaeter-as-aigy-ef -the-abeye-perm4tted- permitted uses - when- autheflzed as- a- spee4al- exeeptleR -by- the- elty- eea ,Re4l- 4e4 Accessory use on the same lot with and customarily incidental to any of the above permitted uses including an apartment for security purposes (Code 1965, § 909.010; Ord. No. 395, § 1, 5- 13 -76; Ord. No. 556, § 1 12-12-83) See - -36 187-- P444m um- dlStaREes fer balldlR9- and- wse f rem- res4deRee-d4str4et- Ne- balld }Rg- 4R - aR- M- l- L4ght- MaRafaete r}Rg- 9l5tic4et -4R- the -e4ty- may -be efeeted altered -er- used- wlthlR- twe- handred- 42984 - feet- .ef- a- re54deRee d4str4et- w}th4R- the- e4ty3- and- pe- l:*igbt- Riapefaetaf }fig -H5e- ray- be- eeRdweted; whether- 4Rs4de- er- eats4de -ef- the- ba}ld}n9; - w404R -twe- hundred- (2884- feet -ef a- re5ldeRee- d}strlet- wthlR- the- Elty exeept- as- aather4zed- by- 5peelal- perf }t 45saed -by the- e4ty- eeaRe4l:- Gede- 19653 - §989:928 Sec. 36 -187. Conditional use a The followi uses are ermi tted in an M -1 Distri subsequent to approval of a condi use ermi t : 1) Used car lot. 2 Yard for the storage, sale or distribution of ice, coal, fuel oil, building materials or similar materials. Junk, salvage or wrecking ards shall not be allowed, 3 Any use listed as a permitted use in a BC Business Commercial District, if the property is des nated for LSC Limited Service Commercial or RM Residential Medium density use on the city' comprehensive plan. 4) Any use of the same character as a permitted use in Section 36 -186. b) No b u i l d i n g or exterior use; except parking, shall be erected, altered or conducted within two hundred feet of a residential d without a conditional use permit. See: -3b- 188 - -Area- and- des}gR- rege}rements- Via)-- A eefplete plea plaFi shewlig the - build4iigs ard sarreand4ng - land areas -ef- the- ent4re -pre feet- fer- a, gy- M- 144ght- Manufaetun4 pg- 8istr4et Riest- be- sebRiltted - the e4ty- eeuiie41 fer- a.ppreval. fib,)-- A- eefplete- set- ef- balld4ng- plans - and- spee }f4eat4ens -and -waste d4spe. sal- and..water- supply- Slays - nest- aeeempaey- the- plet -plan- 4e4 -- The - ty- eeenell- fay- swbRi4t- these - plans- fer- eeFi5lderat}ep -and- reeeRimeRdat}eR -te- the- plann}ng- ESRiflss}eii- Q -- Area -des 4gn- and- setbaek- requ4rements- Riast be- sweh- as- te- esta644sh a- L4ght- MaeafaetwrlFi.g- Bistr4et- wh }eh -w}ll- best - serve - the - general we4fare - and- beRef4t -ef- the- eet4re- e4ty7- 4Cede- 1965 §989 7g384 Sec. 36 -189 36 -188. Side and rear yard setbacks adjacent to residentially zoned property. The minimum side and rear yard setbacks shall be fifty (50) feet and the minimum front yard setback shall be thirty (30) feet. These minimum required setbacks shall be increased, not to exceed seventy -five (75) feet, subject to the most restrictive of the following requirements. 1) Building height: The building setbacks shall-be increased two (2) feet for each one foot the building exceeds twenty -five (25) feet in height. 2) Exterior wail area: Where an exterior wall faces a residentially zoned property, the wall setback shall be increased five (5) feet for each one thousand (1,000) square feet, or part thereof, in excess of two thousand (2,000) square feet. (Ord,No.-529,§9,11-22-82) ee7- 36 -19@ - EeHd44eRal -use.- The-fellew4RS- uses - are- perRi4tted- 4ii- a- M- 1- E4gbt- Marafaetur4Rg- 8}str4et- subsequent- te- rey4ew- ayid- appreval- ef- a- spee4al- ti5e- perMt=4 Secs. 36 -191 36-189-- 36 -200. Reserved. Section 2.: This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Council on 1984. Mayor ATTEST: Ayes -- Clerk Nays -- I I X. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Code Amendment: M -1 District Secretary Olson said this is a proposal to update the M -1 District. The commission questioned if the review board should have the sole approval of site plans for construction that is covered under the M -1 district. Secretary Olson said that there is an appeal process that can bring the site plan before the city council for final approva 1 if someone is not in agreement with the site plan. The commission was also concerned that this may return for another change to eliminate the review board approval and include city council review. They questioned i f it could be included to have either the city council or review board review site plans. They discussed what wou.l d be permitted An the M -1 according to the proposed ordinance. The commission was thought that uses which release certain odors through their manufacturing process, should be eliminated and not permitted., Secretary Olson suggested the uses that concern the commission be regulated by approval through a conditional use permit. Staff did try to use the basic M. -1 district and make only the changes necessary. Commissioner Barrett moved the planning commission recommend to the cityCoPgY council approval of the proposed ordinance to amend the M -1 district as proposed byPPProP staff with the addition to (i) (Iv) to include the word "Poultr y " Commissioner Sigmundik seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Fischer, Larson, Pel 1 i sh, Sigmundik. Whitcomb t MEMORANDUM .. TO City Manager FROM: . Thomas Ekstrand•-- Associate Planner Action by Colrcil SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit LOCATION : Ramsey County Fair. Ground Endorse f...- APPLICANT/OWNER: Ramsey County Modif i PROJECT: Parks and. Recreation Building ReJected - DATE September 21, 1984 f Date l N SUMMARY Requestter..._..__ Approval of a conditional use permit for a two -story office /mainten- ance shop building for Ramsey County Parks and Recreation. Refer to the written explanation on page 7. Comments The 'proposed building conforms to the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan and meets all requirements for a conditional use permit as stated by ordinance. We recommend waiving the one -year review period, since this is a permanent building surrounded by county land. Recommendation Adoption of the resolution on, page 8 approving a conditional use permit for an off ice /maintenance shop building and waiving the one - year review period. Approval is subject to adherence to the site plan received by the city on September 11, 1984, unless a change is approved by the Community Design Review Board. r A BACKGROUND Site Description 1. Site size: 2 acres 2. Existing land use: build ings Ramsey County fair grounds and maintenance Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Fair grounds show ring (corral) Southerly: Parking lot and Ramsey County home Easterl Goodrich Golf Course Westerly: Fair grounds and county barn Past Action 6 - 15 - 78: Council approved a conditional use permit for the construct - ion of the new nursing home. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 1. Land Use Plan designation: P, parks and, playgrounds 2. Zoning: F, farm residential 3. Section 36-437-(2) of the city code states that "conditional use permits may be issued by the city council in any zoning district for public utility, public service or public building uses in any di when found to be necessary for the public health, safety, convenience or welfare." 4. Section 36 -440 states that "the application for a conditional use permit shall include a site plan, showing the kind of conditional use proposed, its location on the property, landscaping and screening improvements, location of utility improvements, and ingress and egress from public roads. The plan shall comply with all building and zoning regulations. The applicant shall provide any other information required by the city." The council may condition the granting of the permit upon adherence to the site plan approved at the public hearing. 5. Section 36-442-(b) states ten findings that approval of a conditional use permit shall be based upon. Refer to findings one through ten in the resolution on page . 6. Section 36- 442 -(c) states that "all conditional use permits shall be reviewed by the council within one year of the date of initial approval, unless such review is waived by council decision or ordinance." Procedure 1. Decision on the site plan and building design by the Board. 2. Recommendation by the planning commission 3. Public hearing and decision by the city council 2 Attachments r le Location map 20 Property line /zoning map 30 Site plan 40 Explanation of use 50 Resolution 6. Plans (separate attachment) 3 I., A lo---L act owoomoow C R 2 -- T _ 6 C164 R 3 2 ' ' PUD R • . R2/ o F iLSC R• 3C 9 . R jJ- t F' Roar PUD R i R• i F C R F p , - .._ • Ml I Ml F T F ' (R2) t a R I t_BC 9 C F Q v R LOC O a.... _........_.! d / asE,Ra r a Ml ', R 3 R N Y R 0, LOC ' F jti -- ........M 1 M I 1 MI 4 1 R 7R11M« - F WAY Jb M t Ayrpo• i M1 r !C _ MI R R I A4P R LR: _. 141T ® I R • s • I R l Nu avE Mp t 4 R • R R— mi a F V Wet 'W .mi H MA r„a . N ROSE woo R2 ' - I AN qY• .....• wr fit' )ROSE w0 F R2 dk f LBC ' R I - i R S . i W AVE R3 L. 8 C •BC 4r R L R3 R iR F _ R tPUD) 1 o seat ltt ' R F F or &4 R R3 •Jol A atlE J ' R R 2` F S Y R ' R F / I. R R ! ovi tip MC, s Cl TY OF ST. PAIL LOCATION MAP Attachment One 4 N AID 4" ' t v • i 5? cc ` w Ck:• , 0 s/ s - R A *A SEY 1 = - co OVETERV i IC 1p GP r Mires .. . rr w . O . • R SSE Couw - f r • tir - 1 -RAMSEY COUNTY GOLF COURSE dW s ` t1ytea • ' - • 1.00 e.. • MEMO 44011 do ow" .00munum On M fW 4W. dwftb qMWWxWWMWsWWWpq dMompumb 40 PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 5 Attachment Two d I a 4 1 fA 1. I . t' r SITE PLAN ffm Attachment 3 4 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION' ITEM NO. 6 The proposed development in this application is a maintenance building for the Ramsey County ,.Parks and Recreation Department. The building will be a 124 ft. by 316 ft. (39,184 sq. ft.) two story structure with a 120 ft. by 300 ft, yard area behind the building. The building will include cold and warm equipment storage areas, vehicle repair shop, stock room., carpenters shop, lunch room, rest rooms, and offices, An 11,124 sq. ft. second floor will provide for a classroom and unfinishednished expansion space. Presently the site is used for the same purpose. The Parks and Recreation Department maintenance operates out of two pole buildings (50' x 80' and 35' x 125 , a mobile home, the old grai eery of the Ramsey County farm, and a 150' x 350' fenced yard area. The four existing structures w i l l .be removed and the activities which take place in each will be consolidated in the new building. The. l ocati on of the new building is adjacent to Goodrich Golf Course, approximately 500 feet east of - the County Fair Barn on White Bear Avenue at Frost Avenue. The site is presently served by water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and streets. No additional municipal services will be required. An increase in traffic over the present use level is not anticipated. The building will be located - approximately 700 feet east of the closest residential area across White bear Avenue. Due to that long distance, the topography, and the existing barn, the proposed development should have. little impact on - the nearest residential development. The use will not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses. The existing pole buildings are emptied by the Parks Department for use by the county fair. The large equipment storage areas in the new building w i l l also be available for use by the fair. This space will provide for better indoor areas for the fair. The reorganization of the site will have .a positive effect on the public health, safety, and welfare of all fair-goers, as well as employees of the Parks and Recreation Department. 7 Attachment Four Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the city council of 'the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the 22nd day of October, 1984 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the Ramsey County Department of Parks and Recreation initiated a conditional use permit for a conditional use permit for an office/maintenance shop facility at the following- described property: Subj. to White Bear Avenue and a pipeline esmt. and subj . to Van Dyke St. and ex the S 235.8 ft. and ex the N 52 ft, of the S 287.8 off the W 160.5 ft. and ex the W 270 ft. lying N of the S 700 ft. that part S of the Mpls -St. Paul and S St. Marie RR R/W of the W 870 ft. of the S 1/2 of the N 1/4 in Sec. 14, T 29, R. 22. This property is also known as the Ramsey County Fair Grounds, Maplewood; • WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 10 This conditional use permit was initiated by Ramsey County, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on October 1, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be approved, 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on October 22, 1984. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described conditional use permit be approved and the one - year review be waived, on the basis of the following findings -of- fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 40 The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and.potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 0 6 . Them' use would generate only minimal vehicular traf f is on l - ocal streets and shall nQt create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7.. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 90 The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features i nto the development design . 100 The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. ills The use is surrounded by county land and would have no significant effect on adjacent proper i tes . Approval is subject to adherence to the site plan received on September 11, 1984 by the city, unless a change is approved by the Community Design Review Board. Adopted this 22nd day of October, 198 Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing ex tract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the 22nd day of October,. 1984, with the original on f i le in my off ice, * and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permit. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1984. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota B. Conditional Use Permit: White Bear Avenue (Ramsey County) Secretary Olson said the proposal is to construct a two - story office/ maintenance shop building for Ramsey County Parks and Recreation. Staff is-recommending approval of the request The commission questioned why the one year renewal was being waived for the county. Secretary Olson said the site is surrounded by county land and not really visible to other properties. The commission said there could be noi resulting from this site, t they questioned if the trucks would be stored outside or in and there could also be clutter, F: Larry Holmberg, Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department, said he E had nothing to add to the staff report. The commission questioned if the existing buildings would be relocated. Mr, Holmberg said there are three existing '1 'g ee ex st g bui d ngs that will1 be removed and consolidated into this building. The trailer will also be removed, rl E F. Commissioner Pellish moved the planning commission recommend the city council adopt the fol resolution approving a conditional use permi and waiving the one -year review period: r WHEREAS, the Ramsey County Department of parks and Recreation initiated a conditional use permit for an office /maintenance shop f a c i l i t y at the z; following-described property: Subject to White Bear Avenue. and pipeline estm. and sub j. to Van Dyke r S and ex ht. t S 235.8 ft. and ex the N 52 ft. of the S 28.7.8 ft of the F W 160.5 ft and ex the W 270 ft lying N of the S 700 ft, that part S of the Mpl s -St. Paul and S St. Marie RR R/W of the W 870 ft of the S 1 of f the N 1 /4 of Section 14, TownshipP 29, R. 22 This property is also know as the Ramsey County Fair Grounds, Maplewood; 10 -1 -84 3 r t WHEREAS. the procedural•k hi story of this conditional use permit i s as follows:ows: 1 . This conditional use permit was initiated by - Ramsey County, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Plannin Commission on O r 1 - eOctober1984. The planning commission recommended to city council that said permit be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described conditional use permit be approved and the one -year review be waived on the basis of the following findings-of-fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the.purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare, 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, genreal unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced byessenti al public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use .would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 11. The use is surrounded by county land and would have no significant effect on ad.j acent properties. Approval is subject to adherence to the site plan received on September 11, 1984 by the city, unless a change is approved by the community design review board. Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Fischer. Larson, Pel 1 i sh, Si gmundi k, Whitcomb 10 -1 -84 4 t MEMORANDUM rolpso !3 A TO FROM SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: DATE City Manager Associate Planner -- Johnson Rezoning (BC and F to R-1) County .Road B .and McMenemy I Street City of Maplewood October 11, 1984 Action by Council: Endorse Modif i e d.--- ........._ Rejected,.. Date SUMMARY Request Rezone this site from BC business commercial and F, farm residence to R -1, single dwelling Reasons for the Request 1. Council initiated this rezoning on September 24, in response to neighborhood opposition to.a proposal to add on to the office building at 359 East County Road B for a stucco contracting business. 2. The BC zoning and the RL, residential low density land use plan designation are incompatible, One or the other should be changed to give.a clear signal to the property owners as to how this property should be used. Comments The zoning for these properties should be changed to R -1, single dwelling to preserve the established single - dwelling character of the area. This action would result in the office building being classified as a legal nonconforming use. This building must continue to be used as an office or the nonconforming use status would cease, limiting the property to the uses permitted in the R -1 zone. No expansion of the office building or change in use to other than permitted in the R -1 zone would be allowed without council approval. Recommendation Approve the enclosed resolution on page 15, rezoning this site from BC, business commercial and F, farm residence to R -1, single dwelling, on the basis that: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code and comprehensive plan, because it would strengthen the existing single - dwelling presidential character of the neighborhood . 2. The proposed use would not detract from the use of neighboring properties. 3. It would be in the public interest to plan for the conversion of the office building property to single dwelling property. Jr A , 4 . The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and-economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and 'schools. 5 The proposed zoning would not be overly restrictive for the office building. site, because it can be divided into two single- dwelling lots very similar in size to several nearby lots. 60 The neighborhood commercial zone is not recommended, because it would allow a substantial nonresidential expansion of the use of this s te. 2 r BACKGROUND Site Description Area: 8.3 acres Existing land use: single dwellings and a small office building and shed Surrounding Land Uses North, east and west: single dwellings South a neighborhood grocery store and single dwellings Previous Use of the BC Portion of the Site The . structure at 359 East County Road B was constructed for and used until two years ago as the business office for Robert Londin's construction firm. Mr. Londin passed away two years ago. Since that time, the building has been used as the office of the administrator of the estate, Ray Fanum. A body shop business attempted to purchase the property after Mr. Lond in' s death, but Mrs. Lond in refused. The property was recently put back on the market resulting in the stucco contractor's recent request to add on to the building (see below). The dwelling at 351 East County Road B was built in the late 1950's or early 1960 ' Past Actions Between 1966 and 1969: The 'two corner lots were rezoned from R -1, single dweling to BC, business commercial. A 1966 zoning map shows this property zoned R -1 and a 1969 zoning map shows this property zoned BC. There are no file records to explain the reasons for the action. 9-25 -84: The community design review board considered a request by a stucco contractor to add on to the office at 359 East County Road B. The applicant withdrew this proposal on September 27, 1984, after considerable neighborhood opposition. Planning 10 Land use plan designation: RL, residential low density 2. Zoning: present - -BC, business commercial; proposed - -R -1, single dwelling 3.. Policies from the plan: a. Page 180 -3: "Maintain and where. necessary, strengthen the character of individual neighborhoods." b. Page 18 -2: "Zoning maps should be updated as necessary to make both the land use maps and zoning maps compatible." 3 4. Compliance with Land use laws: a. Section 36 -485 of code requires four findings to approve a zoning change. Refer to the first four findings in the resolution on page 15.. b. Section 30 -8 (f) (1) of code requires at least 75 feet of width at the setback line and at least 10,000 square feet of. area for single - dwelling lots. The office building property has enough width and area to be split into two lots. c. Section 36 -17 (a) states "any lawful use of a building or band existing at the effective date of any provision of this chapter may be continued although such use does not conform to such provisions of this chapter." d. Section 36 -17 (d) states "if a nonconforming use is voluntarily abandoned and ceases for a continuous period of one year or more, subsequent use of such building or land shall be in conformity with the provisions of this chapter . " Procedure 10 Planning commission recommendation 20 City council decisin following a public hearing jc Attachments: 10 Location map 2. Land use plan map 3. Property line /zoning map 4. Neighbor's letter 5. Resolution LI I/ R L..j R • R R• 8C: F i MI F .._ Z ; '! FClTYOFL /TTL E CA f R L/ J V • ;. s / 8C Z,• i \ _Yk OJ ! 8C L. B C , w 1 BE YCIN' i r LL VI c: I /8C , 5 ,, RpiF :AMNS aE ` ' ; F ROSE. AWN f - r ; • ' r C -;R - _ R J R LnvE J J JL' 6 BC R SuArtMEqR avE ' ^(fit .1 r , B C F E N T LN 4 Q 7 F -.. t F Q ' ILcaFk1 '' ! W '' - 1:5 . 4 R . rJD CJ BC c at R-3 8 C F . C /TY OF ST. PAUL LOCATION MAP J. 5 attachment one 4 N inferch 1 2 Qs 2ON Ir L S J'- r r ' interchange R rte + . • .. • 1 131 .. ZI/11 ft- -- -Lanama jsL ` ro C C11 _ r 1 JO I. • i .a Parkside _ . NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN attachment two 4 N t Sot ( 50! 1Oc i.0 : Se! Z; I ; - N 4. , 3 G 1 r ^w t• 34* tl347T ,357 t ± 365 , 37,5 i 383. 2225 *so ti • :t : "• .. '•' : :: • '. isi ' `••.1 . • ' ' :'Z 4 " t • ` r 1 > > • :- 60 fili 37Q • 374' `• 22053$0 •384 .;. s (3 (Z-9 tt 12190 I fpr - A 1 i: _Q.•. (30) fit . - — . . - ::...•: f .•:: xx 9 2192 2 2.191 Y: yj :T 3t 218 4a. . : i' ... .2188 - 1 1 7 .......Little Canada -• 6 1 Qv: 3 J x _ o .1 59• 134 135 VTI : •.• .::. i .1' : :: : : ..j. A .1 aa65- 123 6 j 6 {r, t ti18' 1g•33 /67 _ -- ct39 80 a iT - ICA izo T7 3 rr.3 77.3 i z 2153 .SZ& 52.E s2•- 2150= NO 09 k) ( rgrocerystoreol 380 214 5 ,s 342 $ - 147 - 410 l ,p a 360 1.ZBoc.. d o S 2137 .41 ,r t02134 . 6 6 36 24) 2129 33a 3Z4.•a ti 300' - -2122 -- C s i .57ac a t2t 37 z 37 1w rL t . t - L - 1314 L 5'T X49 5 i= I i$a 8o 80 80 80 100 8o go 1 8 2Z a r w1 f 1 4 x 5 f 1.: 1 Z 3 2 14 4 pS Z ' •: sa ao 2 80 $o o i too JkA l.si_._ .. _.• _ . L(p j . 1 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 7 attachment three f1C i ' co '^ 100 it 1po , CIE i t 3 !" , l er- e 3c 30' 4407; . N t' 3i 14) `f I!>:! S-0151 I C)", t L, "r S Oct. 1, 1984 City of Maplewood 1902 E. Co Rd. B Maplewood, Minn. 55109 Attn. Jeff Olson, City Planner Citizens Concerning Block 36 c/o Mary E. Olson 365 E. Co. Rd. B Maplewood, Minn. 55117 The City Council has referred us to the Planning Commision the rezoning of Dawson Surburban Acres, Lots 5 and 6, Block 36 On behalf of the neighbors surrounding the area. We the people of the neighborhood are submitting information to sustantiate the rezoning of these properties from BC to R1. It is our understanding from the City Council which met. 9 -24 -84 that' the City of Maplewood would assume the responsibility of f 'ling fees. We were asked by Jeff Olson, City Planner, to address the Criteria for Approval. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL 1. Assure itself that the proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose .and intent of the zoning code. R1 would blend in with the already existing single family dwellings surrounding the properties. Lot S is already a single family dwelling. A copy of the petition enclosed includes the residents surrounding the area who desire the rezoning change. (the original remains in our possession) At present the BC zone would not fit into the new Maplewood Land Use Plan. A R1 zone would definitely fit into this plan. Any other design and any other proposed development would not be in the keepirti1with the character of the surround- ing neighborhood and would be deterimental to the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this ordinance and the Village Comprehensive Municipal Plan. 29 Determine that the proposed change will not substantially in- jure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. Obviously the character of a neighborhood of single family homes would blend into the character of a neighborhood of single family homes. An R1 zone would not injure or detract from the neighborhood. The current BC Zone would have a damaging effect on adjacent properties as well as others because any TYPE of business could move into these lots. Not changing the zoning code would be in jurous to the ad- jacent properties as well as the entire neighborhood. 8 attachment four 30 Determine that the P P groosedchange will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. It is in the best interest of . the community to obtain an R1 zone for these lots. The public welfare would be preserved if a single family dwelling would be built. There would be substantially less traffic involved with an R1 zone as opposed to BC zone. The design and location of the proposed developments and its relationship to neighboring or existing or proposed develop- ments and traffic is such that it will impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood and that it will unreasonable - interfere with the use and enjoyment of neigh - boring, existing or proposed development and it will create traffic hazards and congestion. 40 Consider the effect of the proposed change upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public waters, sewers, police and fire pre; tection and schools. Rezoning would preserve the public services of the community by decreasing the usage of public water and sewers. Many people still have wells and we are concerned of what would happen to our water tables when an undesirable business were allowed to be built. our area is located near a chair of lakes and our environment conditions would be worsened by any other than R1. We want to protect the present waterways and our sewage and drainage system in Maplewood and our neighborhood. In addition we would like to state that Jerry Philipson has withdrawn his application for a building permit intended for Lot 6. Therefore the rezoning of this property would be less complicated. The City Attorney was concerned about rezoning while a building permit was in pursuit. Block 36 should be examined for rezoning from Farm and BC to R1 since a property on this block is occupied by single family dwellings except Lot 6. BC zoning was imposed on Lot 6 for a Nursery /greenhouse which has long been in existence. Block 36 is no longer farms or nursery. It is clearly a residential neighborhood with single family dwellings. CThe zoning of the properties was done quite some time ago when a public official of Maplewood (now deceased) owned the property. We have a genuine concern about traffic, ecology, safety and noise. We have more than a dozen children on Block 36 alone. We are trying to protect and rear our children in a safe environment, Only rezoning will eliminate our current concerns and any future problems regarding some the potential and existing problems as described in our previous ..comments . Thank you for any help or guidance you can give us concerning this issue. D Enclosures Petition Zoning map Block 36 cc John Greavu Norm Anderson Gary Bastian Mary Maida Mike Wasiluk Jeff Olson Barry Evans Tom Ekstrand 10 I i r R We the people of the neighborhood surrounding Dawson Surburban Acres, Lot 5 and b, Block 36, Maplewood, Minn, are concerned. The property stated above is presently zoned Business Commercial. We have no desire for industry to invade our surburban neighborhood. Therefor we wish to address the City Council of Maplewood to consider the rezoning of these properties to Residential. THANK YOU 11 min AL AV iffma 11 Si hone C=Pml Q ° r 776-055/ 77C 055 1 776 -9sc3 9 7 761 u A,....,DwTd t sf X74 -saG r zof Anfwn; took f aaas KwR6+4 7/- 6p S' 12r,7 'o baci k 7, - YAP 71 17 sdas t1n , ZY , 000'. 77 5a -s6 r 971 4CA"Oo 7 7 i /v tx'4C.1 Ik9 , • Z rL 771 'y! A f CITY OF MAPLEWOOD REZONING PETITION We petition the Maplewood City Council to rezone the attached described property from $ L' to Written signature of any person's name on this petition is indication of that person's understanding of the proposed zone, the proposed location and an endorsement for approval of such change. s SIGNATURE dOW I 1,o 6 s 2174 J00 vow- Y11 e& r2 A2 9 W Ss 13y SmcyY1z- ir'rr 1-i $t A r Z- V B El P /10 / i „ r41 7 7,;z Ll 7 1<,e0` 77 7 7 C 7 7( -- G f 4 776— CO) C4( - - 7 ') 7 7 027-4 Z 7 q Now s 77-G,iS 7 7 ( o S”? 7 9 R 9 3 )-. 7116 1s,Z 1- Zvi 3%4-7 77t— a o2 o2 oZ else s137 14 7 7 y -7o6 7 2 /* 77/ GYip X76 -Gsi Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of thegg city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the 22nd day of October, 1984 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business commercial anc3 F, farm residence to R -1, residence district single dwellings for the following- described property: Lots 4 -- 6, block 36, Dawson's Suburban Acre Lots and block one, Lond in Homes i tes WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning commission on October 15, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on October 22, 1984 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code and comprehensive plan, because it would strengthen the existing single - dwelling residential character of the neighborhood. 2. The proposed use would not detract from the use of neighboring properties. 3. It would be in the public interest to plan for the conversion of the office building property to single dwelling property. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. 15 59 The proposed zoning would not be overly restrictive for the office building site, because it can be divided into two single- dwell ing lots very similar in size to several nearby lots, 6. The neighborhood commercial zone is not recommended, because it would allow a substantial nonresidential expansion of the use of this site. Adopted this 22nd day of October, 1984. Seconded by STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS . CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the .22.nd day of October, 1984 with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this rezoning. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1984. City Clerk City of Maplewood. 16 Re Approve a,zone chan from F, farm residence t BC, business commercial to construct a restaurant. Comments The proposed restaurant use would be consistent with the intent of the SC, service commercial land use plan designation and the existin development in the area. Recommendation ( at least four votes in favor are re for app Approve the enclosed resolution ( page 9 , approvin a zone chan from 9 F, farm residence to BC, business commercial for a 156 x 195 foot_ parcel east of White Bear Avenue and abuttin the south line of the Chester's Restaurant property. Action by Coun I . : MEMORANDUM Endorsed--..... k Jed-. ... . TO:Cit Mana Rej ected..... FROM Associate Planner--John son Date SUBJECT:Rezonin (F to BC) LOCATION:White Bear Avenue,south of Chester's Restaurant APPLICANT:Herb Bo.eckerman of Skipper's Inc., OWNERS:Robert and Wa lter Hajicek, Mar Duncan and Doroth Gallowa PROJECT:Skipper's Seafood and Chowder House Restaurant DATE:September 25,.1984 SUMMARY Re Approve a,zone chan from F, farm residence t BC, business commercial to construct a restaurant. Comments The proposed restaurant use would be consistent with the intent of the SC, service commercial land use plan designation and the existin development in the area. Recommendation ( at least four votes in favor are re for app Approve the enclosed resolution ( page 9 , approvin a zone chan from 9 F, farm residence to BC, business commercial for a 156 x 195 foot_ parcel east of White Bear Avenue and abuttin the south line of the Chester's Restaurant property. r " BACKGROUND Site Description r Size: about 156 x 195 feet.' A lot split to create separate ownership for this property will be processed once the zone change is approved. Existing land use: undeveloped Easements: NSP overhead transmission line and American oil pipeline easements cover the entire site. Surrounding Land Uses North: Chester' s Restaurant East: undeveloped land, planned for service commercial use South: Denny's Restaurant West: White Bear Avenue. Across the street are restaurants and the United Artist Theaters Past Action 7 -6 -78: Council moved first reading of a zone change from F, farm residence to BC, business commercial for this site, plus 114 feet to the east, to construct construct J's Restaurant, subject to submission of documentation showing approval from Standard oil Corporation and Northern States Power to build within their easements. There is no record of a second reading and adoption. Planning 1. Land use plan designation: SC, service commercial 20 The SC designation is "oriented to facilities which are local or community *am. scale. While a full range of commercial uses is permitted in this district, certain types of facilities which may be of a high- intensity nature, such as fast -food restaurants, discount sales outlets, gas stations, and light industrial uses, should be permitted subject to specific performance guidelines, The objective of establishing this district is to provide for a wide variety of commercial uses, compatible with the character and development of the neighborhoods in which they are located." 3. Zoning: Present F, farm residence; proposed: BC, business commercial 40 .Section 36 -153 (a) (c) states that restaurants are a permitted use in a 8C, zoning district.. Procedure 1. Planning commission recommendation 2. City council decision, following a public hearing 3W Attachments 1. Location map 2. Property line and zoning map 3. Maplewood Heights land use plan map 4. Site plan 50 Applicant's letter of request 6. Petition 7. Resolution as LOCATION MAP 3 Attachment One a o R2 4 Z I f t 4 N Dwe 11 n ' Hard K Cara 9 a y 04;0 lb c 4.4 o.Goit 0 0 K 4C C . 170 !8 0l ac . t - do b b •.. ' Arby's gLearn Treea' Da . 1.2ac 62s30) r -2 3) lsw•ss•r z 68 19 0 2 z Taco Bell c c •41DAk. !tC Ofit) 3s3.' r .0 Chester t3 O3 -- A Thea oONOft"M .... Ir .r r Mo= r il.r _1 Y •r ` ':•: -: .:' ... j p 1 •' i w i4 41 ! Lss • e lineeproposedsl Iwo ICY S o. 3: wti _, 3 1. _ _ KIJk ow Wendy' Ay•.E, ' Denny's Fi restone Strip Mall u= i f.!! -fir :' p . i719 -'3! 114-01 ,l.r t a O 7e4 • s i •- O • _ 4i O ' - ' ...+ A a 3 co0 MO env* k 47•t.• S'h 4 8 4•j'• P..4 - O.c r o 44 tab •8` r to. - 11D) 4W 10 R+ 1 sec.. IJ. 1146&7f4 ir • A 771; PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Requested zone change (F to BC) 4 Attachment Two I 4 N 329.31V oGo l3 G a. 3 Obr1is • a rte. . . s y 3 i 014.7 jr• 40 V, r PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Requested zone change (F to BC) 4 Attachment Two I 4 N e l , _Pr C eaa1ar rtern aal e mayor c flector- T7 1 R m M J t I .,,- 4 IImaoroors - i J ma or collector TA o ot [ rr AD 7 major collector r ii-i A! d IIHI 111 1-1 -nT1 r- 1111 r 5 4 N r U cc Q Ui. M W 1- 2 3 SI PL 6 Attachment Four 4 N September 10, 1984 Mr. Randy Johnson Community Development Dept. City of Maplewood 1902 E. County Road B. Maplewood, Minnesota Dear Mr. Johnson: Enclosed is our application for rezoning and reploting the parcel of land along White Bear Avenue adjacent to the Maple - wood Mall. I am requesting that the City of Maplewood consider rezoning this vacant parcel of property from Residential Farmland, to Commercial Business, to allow for the development and operation of a Skipper's Seafood & Chowder House Restaurant. This parcel is ideally suited for a restaurant operation because of its high visibility from White Bear Avenue and proximity to the Regional Shopping Mall. The Restaurant development would be consistant with the spirit and purpose of the Zoning Code, as well as being consistant with the adjacent neighboring restaurant developments to the north and south of this parcel. Our studies indicate that our type of restaurant will best serve this comm- unity by offering an alternative type of dining which is both convenient and appealing to a segment of the market whose needs are not yet satisfied. Sincerely, Herb Boeckerman • Regional Manager Real Estate 7 Attachment Five F L I T Y OF MA PL EWOOD '• REZONING PETITION We petition the . Maplewood City Council to rezone,--the attached described proper f r om Farm. Residential to Business Cwrercial Written signature of any person's name on this petition i indicationonti of than person's understanding of the proposed zone,the proposed location and 1an- m fo approval of such cha nge. P`Gdd SS D Le P62C.. t Vvt6 t C!s I F'A`Q c_.Mr1,,,, tlp a - p c. N s 5 o c I p ter-5 FOkZCE l.. V n rl Attachment Six RA 8458 Pursuant to due oall and notice thereof, , a regular meeting of the 14 city council of the City of' Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held In the council chambers in sa l city on the day of 1984 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Herb Boeckerman initiated a rezoning from F, farm residenc to BC, business commercial to for the following- described property: That part of the following described parcel lying westerly of the easterly 114.15 feet thereof: That part of the North 10. - acres of the East 20 acres - of the North half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the inter- section of the easterly right -of -way line of White Bear Avenue and the North line of the South 100.00 feet of said 10 acres; thence easterly along said North line of the South 100 feet a distance of 309.40 feet; thence northerly at a right angle 155.94 feet to a point on a line parallel with and distant 493.50 feet South of the North line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 2; thence westerly along said parallel line 306.82 feet to the easterly right -of -way line of White Bear Avenue; thence southerly along said right-of-way line to the point of. beginning. Subject to an easement in favor of Northern States Power Company and an easement in favor of the American Oil Company. Containing 0.70 acres more or less. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by Herb Boeckerman, Skipper's, Inc., pursuant to Chapter 36 Article VII of the Maplewood Code of ord i na nces . 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on Ocober .1, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be . 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 1984 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 9 Y 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code and the land use plan. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract f rom , the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, .and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Approval is subject to the applicant submitting written permission from NSP and Standard Oil to build within their easements. Adopted this day of ,1984 . Seconded by STATE OF MINNESOTA } COUNTY OF RAMSEY } SS. CITY OF MA PL EWOOD } I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of, minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of 1984 with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this rezoning. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1984. City Clerk City of Maplewood. 10 C. Rezoning: White Bear Avenue' (Skippers) Secretary Olson said the -request is for a zone change from F to BC to construct a' restaurant. Staff i s recommending approval, Herb Boeckerman, Skippers Restaurant, said he had nothing to add to the staff report. There are restaurants on both sides of the property and feels their proposal is consistent with the development in the area. He has talked with property owners and they have no objections to the proposal. He presented a copy of a 1979 judgment which says permission of the power l i n e company is not required to build on the property as long as they stay within the National Electrical . Code requirements. They will not encroach on the pipeline easement, however, with the grading of the site, they will have to 1 over the pipeline. He said this is a sit down type restaurant. There is no drive -up window or carry -out facilities. Commissioner Fischer moved the planning commission recommend the city council approve the fol l ng resolution: WHEREAS,Herb Boeckerman intiated a rezoning from F, farm residence BC, business commercial for the fol lwi ng- descri bed property: That part of the following described parcel lying westerly of the easterly 114.15 feet thereof: That part of the north 10 acres of the east 20 acres of the north half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as follows; Beginning at the i.ntersecti on of the easterly right -of --way l i n e of White Bear Avenue . and the north l i n e of the south 100.00 feet of said 10 acres; thence easterly along said north line of the south 100 feet a distance of 309.40 feet; thence northerly at a right angle 155.94 feet to a point on 'a l i n e parallel with and distant 493.50 feet south of the north line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 2; thence westerly along said parallel l i n e 306.82 feet to the easterly right -of -way l i n e of White Bear Avenue; thence southerly along said right -of -way l i n e to the point of beginning. Subject to an easement in favor of Northern States Power Company and an easement in favor of the American Oil Company, Containing 0.70 acres more or less, WHEREAS, the procedural history - of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by Herb Boeckerman, Skipper's, Inc., pursuant to Chapter 36 Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Comission on October 1, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings- of-fact: 10 -1 -84 5 I r I . The proposed change is consistent with the spirit. purpose and intent of the zoning code and the land use plan. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property. adjacent to the area included i n the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare, 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and f i.re protection and schools. Approval is subject to the applicant submitting written permission from Northern States Power and Standard of 1 to build within their easements. Commissioner Sigmundik seconded. Ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Fischer, Larson, Pel l i sh, Si gmundi k, Whitcomb MEMORANDUM Action by Council: TOW City Manager Endorsed- FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson odi icd_,_._.._,.` SUBJECT:Zone Change (BC to F) LOCATION: 1800 Edgerton Street Rejecte APPLICANT: City of Maplewood Date OWNER: Forest Lawn Memorial Park Associati and the Soo Line Railroad DATE: September 11, 1984 SUMMARY Re Down zone the Forest Lawn Cemetery office building site from BC, business commercial to F. farm residence. Reason for the Request This proposal is part of the city's down - zoning program. The OS, open space land use plan designation and BC, business commercial zoning are not compatible. One or the other should be changed to give a consistent signal as to how the city wants this property to be used. Comments This site should be down zoned from the BC zoning to F, farm residence. The property owner does not wish to apply for a land use plan amendment to retain the commercial zoning. The F, farm residence zone w0uld be consistent with the zoning of other cemeteries in the city. The F zone would allow the cemetery use to continue, while assuring the city that this s i t e would not be sold to and used for a business use not related to the cemetery. The residential and open space character of this neighborhood should be maintained. Since a cemetery is a conditional use in a F zone, the existing office building would become a legal nonconforming use. Any expansion would require a conditional use permit. The applicant has no further plans for expansion. Recommendation (At least four votes in favor for approval) Approve the enclosed resolution (page 7) rezoning 1800 Edgerton street from BC, business commercial to F, farm residence. A BACKGROUND Site Description Size; a triangular piece, about 3.4 acres in area Existing land use: The Forest Lawn Cemetery office buildin g and abandoned railroad right-of-way along the southeast boundary of the site. The Department of Natural Resources is urchasin theP9 right of way for a trail. Surrounding Land Uses North: Forest Lawn Cemetery Southeasterly: abandoned railroad right-of-way, undeveloped land zoned F, farm residence and a single dwelling West: Edgerton Street. Across the street are two single dwellings9andanundevelopedsingle- dwelling parcel. Past Actions 6- 14 -83: The community design review board approved the expansion and remodeling of the Forest Lawn office building located on this P arcel. Planning 1. Land use plan designation: OS, open space 2. Zoning: Present - -BC, business commercial; proposed - -F, farm residence. 3. Policies from the plan: Page 18 -2 "Zoning maps should be updated as necessary to make both the land use maps and zoning maps compatible." 4. Compliance with land use laws: a. Section 36 -485 requires four findings to approve a zone change. Refer to the enclosed resolution for these findings. b. Section 36 -51 permits cemeteries in F, farm residence districts by conditional use permit. c. Section 36 -17 (a) states "Any lawful use of a building or land at the effective date of any provision of this chapter zoning code) may be continued although such uset does not conform to the provisions of this chapter, d. Section 36 -17 subdivisions (b) , (d) and (f) state that a change in use, structural alteration or expansion of a nonconforming use shall require council approval b conditional use permit. PP Y 2 Procedure R 1. Planning commission recommendation 20 City council decision following a public hearing jc Attachments 1. Location map 2. .Property line /zoning map 30 Neighborhood land use plan map 4. Resolution 3 LITTLE CANADA 35 MINA rw. K1 MAN AV I NOTPloStLAWNVERNON AVEy f- 7r Do NS AVE.1 E3 40Lt'0 AV. i SUMM A t 1 fE W TON AVELl al s z i CT J J N p. jKIWGSX nF] s t W t Q W 55 E 5QQ HV u. r • _. dp IL LARK VE '•' VIKIN KAffle/ Z'. 4n W f AURI :E R0. 4 or e 25 ;. N BURKE V. 0 + 4 H 1 ELDRIDGE h Q E AV. • BE.wo T LA. eFLMoNt EKI wL o AVE. c 58 F A& r W 1 9 z uj W . t MT. VERNON AVE. W W fER 0 W 60 or O AVE. W IL ; fl E, i LwOOD AVE. z '`J bw t o In IN Ill A 4" Y AV E. Tf, 10 Ck j r z • KfNG ST AVE. 4 W ICE E. O o 30 7 ra ST. PAUL LOCATION MAP 4 attachment one 4 N 57 . PAUL CE Zvi E i ERY POND FOREST LAWN CEMETERY C) J g 41.T s !D 01-- A — `PLEY AVENUE -- °.' _ t ' .of : :i:• •:;; :: . z 1800 IN4 .. . f,.• :.1: •a :•:::. :•.•:...: A N ••• ' : •••• •• •• • •• 1771 0 1 7 7 5 1 i. ,.:_ ; UNIMPROVED qp 762 4b 29 z C Z i ICY 0 " 00000,00000", c ' = i 756 P :. a - ' ; ' _ - •`- ' • 1754 22 12 t iC 9 S ~ a G ..) 14 C M1 * 1 4 >< `? t 1 Z ` -) f r !• { ! . 1746 o KINGSTON v , 22 R . 3.24 125_ L;6 '27 12 a ?9 t J 4 3 fL r f'rl RIGS -X\ O U N Tr 8 ' ro y' f o Z oil Z 1 0 N Z- ---- n M. - • - - - - - - • - - - - - - - - • .. .. - • REW 43 IC 4qwr i ow -T- I CEME E P, Y s X40, t P LAT A IQ la BLOCKS- 1 THRJ 5 8 THP -) 7 is rr PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 5 attachment two 4 N 10 MONO 2. uj Z8 1MOb 9 o y i 0Q r 4 3 fL r f'rl RIGS -X\ O U N Tr 8 ' ro y' f o Z oil Z 1 0 N Z- ---- n M. - • - - - - - - • - - - - - - - - • .. .. - • REW 43 IC 4qwr i ow -T- I CEME E P, Y s X40, t P LAT A IQ la BLOCKS- 1 THRJ 5 8 THP -) 7 is rr PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 5 attachment two 4 N Pursuant., .t•Q due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers i said city on the day of at 7 p.m. a The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business commercial to F, farm residence for the following- described properties: That part of the Forest Cemetery Rearrangement of plat B, lying north of the Soo Line railroad right -of -way, within the . SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 17, Township 29, Range 22; and That part of the N 1/2 of the Soo Line railroad right -of -way, lying east of the center line of Edgerton Street and west of the northerly extension of the east line of lot 22, block 1, Ufton Grove Second Plat,, WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to chapter 36 article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances, 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on October 1, 198440 The Planning Commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 1984 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following9 findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose intentntent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood , and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare. 7 Attachment four R 4 . The proposed change would have no negativeive effect uponpon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protectionjAptect and schools. Adopted this day of 1984* Seconded by STATE OF MINNESOTA' j COUNTY OF RAMSEY SS CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing . extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of 1984 with the original on file in. my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this rezoning. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1984. City Clerk City of Maplewood, 0 JA D ]Rezoning: 1800 Edgerton (Forest Lawn Cemetery)g Secretar y Olson said the the proposal is to down zone the Forest Lawn Cemetery office building from BC, business commercial to F. farm residence. The re resentative from Forest Lawn park said they have no objections to the P zone change. Th e commission questioned i f the rest of the cemeteries in Maplewood are zoned Farm. Secretary Olson said yes si oner Whitcomb moved the planningn commi ss on recommend the city councilCommisPg adopt the following resolution: WHEREAS the city of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business commercial to T,, farm residence for the following-described properties: That P art of the Forest Cemetery Rearrangement of Plat B, lying north of the Soo Line Railroad right -of -way, within the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 17, Township 299 Range 22; and That P art of the N 112 of the Soo Line Railroad right -of -way, lying east of the center line of Edgerton Street and west of the northerly extension of the East l i n e of lot 22, block 1, Ufton Grove Second Plat. WHEREAS the P rocedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1.. This.rezonin g was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewedewed b the Maplewood Planning Cornmi ssi on on Octoberezgy 1. 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be approved. 6 10 -1 -84 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNIGN COMMISSION that the above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings-ndi n s-g of -fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2' The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interest and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare.' 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, of f i c.i ent, and economical extension of public services and 'facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes--Commissioners Axdahl , Barrett, Fi scher, Larson, Pel 1 i sh, Sigmundi k, . Whitcomb E. Hearing Date: Larpenteur and Edgerton Secretary Olson said the proposal is to amend the land use plan from RL to LSC. Staff is suggesting a hearing on October 15. i Commissioner Fischer moved the planning commi ss i on establish a public hearing for a plan amendment for October 15, 1984. E Commissioner Garrett seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Ax.dahl, Barrett, Fischer, Larson, Pel l i sh, Sigmundi k, Whitcomb I DOUGHERTY DAWKINS, STRAND & YOST INCORPORATED Action by Col.::c ±l Endorse October 4, 1984 Modif e - ---- -- Rej ected. Date Mr. Barry Evans City Manager City of Maplewood City Hall 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Evans As you are aware, Dougherty, Dawkins, Strand & Yost is repre- senti. ng Advance Circuits, Incorporated on the private placement of an industrial revenue bond in the City of Ro sevi 1 le . On behalf of my client, I would like to express my sincere app re-re- ciation to you and the members of the City Council for your willingness to consider and positively approve a Joint Powers Agreement allowing for the City of Maplewood allocation in the amount of $3.6 million to be transferred to the City of Roseville in order for this industrial revenue bond financing to be completed. e g p ted . For your information, ormati.on , our current schedule calls for a closing date of October 10, 1984* The purpose of this letter is to respectfully request an opportunity to appear at the City Council meeting of the City of Maplewood on the evening of October 8, 1984 to directly express our appreciation to the City Council and, further, to discuss with the City Council the City of Maplewood fee portion for this transaction. We currently understand that your olicies providePP for a $20,000 payment to the City of Maplewood for this transfer of allocation. Thank you for your attention to this matter and we look for- ward to seeing you at the City Council meeting on the evening of October 8, 1984. With personal regards, I am Sincerely, , Ralph L. McGinley Vice President RLM /kjo INVESTMENT BANKERS 700 LUMBER EXCHANGE BUILDING 0 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55401 0 612/341 -6000 41MWsow MEMORANDUM TO City Manager FROM-: City Engineer SUBJECT: T. H. 120 nd 3M Road Signals DATE October 15, 1984 Action by Endorsed..—, Modif Rejected___. Date MnDOT is proposing to replace the signal. systems along T. H. 120 at both the north and south ramps for I -94 and at 3M Road, The State has requested Maplewood's participation in the amount of $20 the installation at 3M Road. The I -94 systems are fully funded by State and Federal. 3M Road is not under city jurisdiction. Minnesota Mining owns and maintains the roadway. It is quite apparent, however , that the public as well as 3M employees use the street. 3M officials were contacted about helping the city fund its portion of the project. 3M declined because they felt the project was substantially an improvement used by the general public. Their position is certainly understandable and therefore it is recommended that the city totally finance its share of the project. TO: F ROM SUBJECT: DATE: Action by Council: Endorse Modifie Rejecte Date Attached is a feasibility study of the storm drainage and sanitary sewer systems for the Beaver Lake area that was prepared by TKDA, Inc. This study summar i zes the projected storm water rates and. required pond storage and sedimentation volumes to control these flows. The study also summarizes the projected flow rates and available capacities in the sanitary sewer system, Based upon the findingsYP of this study and additional calculations made by the engineering department, the following plan is proposed to provide adequate storm drainage and sanitary sewer capacity for this area: 1. Referring to figure 3 between pages 6 and 7 of the TKDA, Inc. study, pond #5 and pond #4 should be combined and referred to as and 4. p 20 The existing site of pond #4 provides an adequate storage capacity of 56.93 acre -feet without excavation to a maximum high water elevation of 965.80 during the 100 -year design event. Des i n9 standards recommend that approximately two feet of freeboard be provided between the lowest floor elevation fronting n the ogpond and the maximum high water elevation during the 100 --year design storm. 3. Some minor excavation and ditching would be required in the existing pond #4 site to provide proper drainage to the 36 inch RCP culvert connecting pond #4 to pond #2. 4. A drainage easement should be acquired from the developer, Castle Design and Development Co.,, Inc . , for the proposed pond #4 site, The developer has used the density credit from the proposed pond #4 site in his development plans for the Beaver Creek Carriage Home condominiums. 510 As part of the development of the Beaver Creek Carriage Home condominiums, the developer has submitted site radin plans, whi hggP • call for development of pond #2. This pond should be graded to provide 12.4 acre -feet at a maximum high water elevation of 965.9 70. As part of the development, Castle Design will dedicate the drainageeasementtothecity. 60 Q The existing site is adequate to provide the necessary storagegforpond #1. An easement should be acquired for this site, 7. Sediment basins should be constructed at the outlets from and #2 and and 1 o P p # t control pollutants from entering Beaver Lake, MEMORANDUM City Manager Assistant City Engineer Beaver Lake Drainage Study October 15, 1984 8. The ditch between pond #2 and pond #1 should be channelized and riprapped to provide adequate flow capacity and erosion protection. I J 90 The current 48 inch outlet under Lakewood Drive from pond #1 is adequate, but the inverts are below the normal lake level which create serious maintenance problems. This culvert should be raised as part of the McKnight Road project to the normal lake level. No work should be performed as part of this project on the culvert 10. The sanitary sewer pipes are adequate for current flows but are projected to be under capacity when the area, becomes fully developed, Development of the Seaver Lake Hills site is uncertain at this time. It is recommended that no work be performed on the sanitary sewer pipes at this time as part of this project. 11. Lift station #6 handles all the sanitary sewer flow ,for this area. It is currently under capacity and will be upgraded as a budgeted item in 1985. The flows as calculated for this project will be'used to adequately meet the projected future demand. No work on lift station #6 is recommended as part of this project. 12. The cost to implement this plan is estimated to be $650,000.00 including land acquisition, sediment basins, excavation, riprap and indirect costs. The proposed assessable area contains approximately 10,515,000 square feet, which leaves a proposed assessment rate of 0615 /foot. It is requested that the city council considered this study and plan.