Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984 10-02 City Council PacketAGENDA Maplewood City Council 7:00 P.M., Monday, October 2, 1984 East County Line Fine Station #2 L.ondin Lane at tower Afton Road Meetinq 84 -22 VISITOR PRESENTATIONS K) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS M) ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Thursday, September 24, 1984 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 84 -21 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present MaryLee Maida, Councilmember Present Michael T. Wasiluk,Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES D. E 1. Minutes of Meeting No. 84 -20 (September 10, 1984) Councilmember Bastian moved that the Minutes of Meeting No. 84 -20 (September 10, 1984) be approved as submitte . Seconded by Councilmember Anderson.Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmember Anderson, Bastian and Wasiluk. Councilmember Maida abstained. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Councilmember Bastian moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. County Road B and McMenemy 2. State Code - Sprinkler Systems 3. 3M - Battle Creek Charge 4. Commissioner's Meeting 5. Variance Alternative 6. Wakefield Park 7. Bobeldyk 8. Budget Seconded by Mayor Greavu.Ayes - all. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Anderson moved, seconded by Councilmember Bastian, Ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda Items 1 through 10 as recommended: Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part I - Fees, Services and Expenses - Check Register dated September 14, 1984 and September 17, 1984 $491,324.76: Part II - Payroll Check dated September 7, 1984 - $62,630:11) in the amount of $553,954.87. 1 - 9/24 2. Budget Transfer for Temporary Help - Finance Approved a budget transfer of $1,430 from the money originally budgeted for the purchase of a phone system to finance the temporary accountant's wages and worker's compensation insurance costs in the finance department. 3. Renewal of G.H.P. and E.B.P. Contracts Approved that the existing one year contracts for employee insurance be renewed with Group Health Plan and Employees Benefit Plan. 4. Renewal of B.C.B.S. Contract Approved that the existing one year contract for employee insurance with Blue Cross /Blue Shield be renewed for one year with the addition of the AWARE Program subject to the bargaining unit's approval. 5. Appropriation from P.A.C. Fund Approved a budget appropriation of $7,000 from the Commercial P.A.C. Fund to the Good- rich Overlay Project. 6. Final Payment and Change Order: Project 80 -10 84 -9- 134 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project No. 80 -10, T.H. 61, Frontage Road, and has let a construction contract, therefore, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429; and WHEREAS, said project has been certified as completed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the project is completed and final payment on the construction contract is hereby authorized. Resoltuion No. 84 -9 -135 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project No. 80 -10, T.H. 61 Frontage Road, and has let a construction con- tract therefore pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429; and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project No. 80 -10, Chage Order No. 6. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the Mayor and City Engineer are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order No. 6. 7. Final Payment: Project 84 -6 Resolution No. 84 -9 -136 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project No. 84 -6, Bituminous Overlay Project and has let a construction contract; and WHEREAS, said project has been certified as completed. 2 - 9/24 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the project is completed and final payment on the construction contract is hereby authorized. 8. Time Extension: Tilsen's 11th Addition Approved a six month time extension for Robert Tilsen's Maplewood Heights No. 11 planned unit development and preliminary plat. 9. Change of Manager on Liquor License - Holiday Inn Approved Gary Lee Wink as the holder of the On Sale Intoxicating Liquor License at the Holiday Inn, 1780 E. County Road D. 10. Change of Manager on Liquor License - Red Lobster Approved Leonard Goodrum as Manager- License holder for the On Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Red Lobster. Councilmember Bastian moved to waive the Rules of Procedures to hear J - Visitor Pre- sentation at this time. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. J. VISITOR PRESENTATION 1. Mr. Ted DeZurick a. Mr. Ted DeZurick stated he is building four and eight unit condominiums on Larpenteur Avenue known as Bennington Woods. He applied for a building permit and was told he needed a sprinkling system. The cost per building is extensive and he requests the Council investigate the need for such requirements. b. Council adopted an optional code regarding sprinkling system and Mr. DeZurick's building falls in this category. c. Councilmember Anderson instructed staff to investigate the need for such code Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M. Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit (WMIN) The hearing was cancelled, the applicant withdrew their request. 2. 7:10 P.M. - Conditional Use Permit - County Road D (Podawiltz) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Maple Ridge Partnership for a conditional use permit for a 41 foot tall apart- ment building to be located on the north side of County Road D between 1655 and 1729 East County Road D. Maplewood Code permits a maximum of 35 feet. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. 3 - 9/24 c. Board Member Rossbach presented the following Community Design Review Board recommendation: WHEREAS, Maple Ridge Partnership initiated a conditional use permit to build a 41 foot tall apartment building when the maximum permissable height is 35 feet at the following described property: That part of the W 112 of the E 1/2 of the SE 1/4 lying south of the right of way of U.S. Highway No. 694, all in Section 34, Township 30, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, containing approximately 5.06 acres. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by Maple Ridge Partnership, pursuant to Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Community Design Review Board on August 14, 1984. The Community Design Review Board recom- mended to the City Council that said permit be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD that the above described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not'create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Board Member Deans seconded.Ayes all." 4 - 9/24 d. Mr. Mike Podawiltz, the developer, spoke on behalf of the proposal. He also stated he agrees to the conditions recommended by the Community Design Review Board. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 84 - 9 - 137 WHEREAS, Maple Ridge Partnership initiated a conditional use permit to build a 41 foot tall apartment building when the maximum permissable height is 35 feet at the following described property: That part of the W 1/2 of the E 112 of the SE 1/4 lying south of the right of way of U.S. Highway No. 694, all in Section 34, Township 30, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, containing approximately 5.06 acres. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by Maple Ridge Partnership, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Community Design Review Board on August 14, 1984. The Community Design Review Board recommended to the City Council that said permit be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on September 24, 1984. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written state- ments. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Community Design Review Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character'of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5 - 9/24 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 11. The six extra feet of building height is insignificant due to the freeway location and large setbacks. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. G. AWARD OF BIDS None. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Plan Amendment - Maplewood West Boulevard a. Director of Community Development Geoff Olson presented the staff report. b. The following persons spoke on behalf of Mr. William Korstad's development and proposal for the roads: Mr. James Benshaaf, Benshaaf and Associates Mr. Perry Bolen, Bolen and Associates Mr. Karl Grittner Mr. William Korstad, the developer. c. The following persons spoke on behalf of Mr. Robert Hajicek's development and proposal for the roads: Mr. Peter Fausch, Stegar- Roscoe, Inc. Mr. Robert Hajicek. d. Mr. Greg Tilsen, Homart, Inc. and Mr. Bill Knutson, Health Resources, Inc., expressed their views as to how each proposal would effect their development. e. Councilmember Anderson moved to adopt the following staff recommendation for the Maplewood West Boulevard eve opmen : 1. Adopt guidelines, based on keeping as many options open as possible, rather than amending the plan, because: a. The streets are basically local and do not need to be shown on the plan. b. It would be premature to draw specific alignments on the land use plan map, when development plans have not yet been done. 6- 9/24 c. Guidelines need to be adopted, however, to give direction to the developers in this area. The guidelines are as follows: 1) The following streets should be included in development plans for the area: a) Maplewood West Boulevard from at least Beam Avenue to the north property line of Mr. Korstad's property. Continuation of this street to County Road D may be allowed by the City, provided that traffic from Mr. Hajicek's property is reasonably distributed over Hazelwood Avenue, Maplewood West Boulevard and a future Southlawn Drive. b) A Southlawn Drive from Beam Avenue to County Road D. The alignment may have to be realigned to the west to front on properties that would benefit from the assessments. c) An east -west street(s) connecting Hazelwood AVenue and the Maplewood Mall ring road. There should be access to this street from the Korstad and Hajicek properties. 2) Specific alignments will be determined at the time that development plans are submitted to the City, except that alignments for a Maplewood West Boulevard and an east -west street to the mall ring road are approved as follows (plan on file in the Community Development Department): Maplewood West Boulevard as a through street, with a curve to the east. This curve would intersect an east -west street from the mall ring road, along the Korstad- Hajicek - Homart property line, at a point between 320 and 500 feet from the west line of the Homart property. 3) Change Maplewood West Boulevard to Kennard Street to be consistent with the City's street system and to avoid confusion with Maplewood Drive (Highway 61). Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 2. Code Amendment: Environmental Protection and Critical Areas Ordinance (Second Reading) a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 571 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MAPLEWOOD CODE RELATING TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND CRITICAL AREA ORDINANCES 7 - 9/24 Section 1. Chapter nine of the Code of Ordinances is amended to consolidate the Critical Area Ordinance (Sections 36 -496 through 36 -549) with the Environmental Protection Ordinance (Sections 9 -186 through 9 -193) as follows: ARTICLE IX. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND CRITICAL AREA DIVISION 1, GENERALLY Section 9 -186. Purpose. The purpose of this ordinance is to protect significant natural features, which: 1) Preserve the natural character of neighborhoods 2) Protect the health and safety of residents 3) Protect water quality 4) Prevent erosion or flooding 5) Manage the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area in accordance with the Critical Areas Act of 1973, the Minnesota Policy Act of 1973 and the Gover- nor's critical area designation order, Executive Order 130, dated November 23, 1976. Section 9 -187. Applicability. This ordinance shall apply to any new subdivision, development or building to be approved by the City Council or Community Design Review Board. This ordinance shall not apply to any use permitted on a temporary basis for a period not to exceed two years, when such use is established without site preparation. Section 9 -188. Definitions. Bluffline - -a line delineating a top of a slope with direct drainage to a protected water, connecting the points at which the slope becomes less than eighteen percent. More than one bluffline may be encountered proceeding landward from a protected water.) Critical Area - -The Mississippi River Corridor Area bounded by Carver Avenue, I- 494 and the City limits. Crown Cover - -the ratio between the amount of land shaded by the vertical projection of the branches and foliage area of standing trees to the total area of land, usually expressed as a percentage. Direct Drainage -- drainage into a protected water without an intervening pond or wetland Erosion - -the general process by which soils are removed by flowing surface or sub - surface water or wind 8 - 9/24 Gross Soil Loss - -the average annual total amount of soil material carried from one acre of land by erosion Lift Station - -a facility, including pumping facilities, for the lifting of sewage or storm water runoff to a higher sewage facility or storm water runoff facility Pipeline - -an underground line of pipe including associated pumps, valves, control devices and other structures utilized for conveying liquids, gases, sewage or other finely divided solids from one point to another Protected Water -- formerly referred to as public waters, means any water defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 105.37, subdivision 14 Retaining Wall - -a structure utilized to hold a slope in position which it would not naturally remain 'in Sediment -- suspended matter carried by water, sewage or other liquids Slope- -the inclination of the natural surface of the land from the horizontal; commonly described as a ratio of the length to the height. Structure -- anything manufactured, constructed or erected which is normally attached to or positioned on land, including portable structures Substation - -any utility structure, other than lines, pipelines, holes or towers Terrace - -a relatively level area bordered on one or more sides by a retaining wall Tree - -any woody plant, except a shrub, that has at least one trunk whose diameter is four inches or greater, four feet above the ground Utility Facility -- physical facilities of electric, telephone, telegraph, cable television, water, sanitary and storm sewer, solid waste, gas or similar service operations Vegetation - -all plant growth, especially trees, shrubs, mosses or grasses Water Body - -any lake, stream, pond, wetland or river Wetland - -any land which is seasonably wet or flooded, including all marshes, bogs, swamps or floodplains Section 9 -189. Density Guarantee. The requirement in this article shall prevent the development of property to the maximum density allowed in the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan Update. The City Council may require the clustering of dwellings in the form of townhouses quads or apart- ments or similar uses, where it is necessary to preserve natural features. Single family homes are not precluded from consideration as part of any proposed development under this ordinance. 9 - 9/24 DIVISION 2, SITE PLANNING REQUIREMENTS Section 9 -190. Site plan required The applicant shall submit a site plan and any other information needed to determine compliance with this ordinance. Specific requirements shall be stated on an appli- cation form in the office of the Director of Community Development. Section 9 -191. Site Plan approval standards. No site plan which fails to satisfy the following standards shall be approved: 1) General standards a. The conduct of all grading, landscaping, structure placement, and street routing shall be consistent with and to the maximum extent in the further - ance of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and for development in the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area, the Maplewood Critical.Area Plan. b. The proposed - development shall not lessen existing public access to and along a protected water. c. The proposed development shall be designed, constructed and maintained to avoid causing: 1. Accelerated erosion 2. Pollution, contamination or siltation of water bodies or storm sewers d. Flooding 4. Ground water contamination. d. Development shall nto substantially diminish the scientific, historical educational, recreational or aesthetic value of unique natural areas and unique plant and animal species, which are registered with the State as such, and shall not substantially alter the reproductive cycle of the species. e. Views of protected waters from buildings or public streets shall not be impaired by the placement of advertising signs. 2) Slopes a. No development shall be permitted on existing slopes of eighteen percent or greater which are in direct drainage to a protected water. b. In areas not in direct drainage to a protected water, no development shall be allowed,on existing slopes greater than forty percent c. No development, whether or not in direct drainage to a protected water, shall be permitted on land having an existing slope in excess of twelve percent, unless the applicant proves the following conditions are met: 1. Controls and protections exist uphill from the proposed development such that there is no danger of structures or streets being struck by falling rock, mud, sediment from erosion, uprooted trees or other materials. 10 - 9/24 2. The proposed development presents no danger of falling rock, mud, sediment from erosion, uprooted trees or other materials to structures downhill. 3. The view of a developed slope within the Critical Area from the Mississ- ippi River and opposite river bank is consistent with the natural appear- ance of the undeveloped slope, consistent with any state registered historic areas nearby, compatible with the view from historic areas, and compatible with surrounding architectural features. 4. The City Engineer may require the developer to provide a soils engineer to certify the stability of potentially unstable slopes. d. The basic character of natural slopes of 25% or more in grade shall not be altered without approval from the City Council. The Council shall base their decision on: 1. The degree of alteration of the slope and 2. The improtance of the slope to the character of the area. e. All new structures and roads shall be placed no closer than forty feet feet from a bluff line. Exceptions shall be: 1. Public recreation facilities, scenic overlooks, public "observation" platforms or public trail systems 2. The construction of above - ground pumping stations 3. Other development, when the applicant can conclusively demonstrate that construction or final development will not negatively impact slopes with a grade of eighteen percent or greater 4. All other structures, other than buildings and raodway surfaces, but including retaining walls, shall meet the following design requirements: a) Retaining walls or terrace contours in excess of three feet in height shall have a fence. b) Construction materials shall be subject to Community Design Review Board approval. f. The requirements of this section shall not apply in the following situations: 1. Where a slope has been substantially altered by prior excavation or filling. 2. Where a slope is less than 200 feet in length (top to bottom) or 500 a feet in width (side to side). 3. Where earth sheltered homes are proposed. Erosion control and soils: a. All erosion control, storm water run -off, utility and similar structures shall be designed to be maintained and operated without requiring the 11 - 9/24 crossing or operation of heavy maintenance vehicles and equipment, such as bulldozers, trucks and backhoes, on slopes in excess of eight percent. This requirement may be waived by the City Council where there is no other alternative. b. Construction shall not be allowed where there are soil problems, including but not limited to, soil bearing strength, shrink /swell potential or ex- cessive frost movement, unless effective soil correction measures or build- ing construction methods are approved by the building official. c. Development shall be accomplished only in such a manner that on -site gross soil loss levels shall not exceed five tons per acre per year during con- struction, but only two tons per acre per year when the site is adjacent to a water body, water course or storm sewer inlet and 0.5 tons per acre per year after construction activities are completed. d. A development shall be located to minimize the removal of vegetation and alteration of the natural topography. e. Erosion protection measures shall make maximum use of natural, inplace vegetation, rather than the placing of new vegetation on the site. 4) Wetlands a. Wetlands and other water bodies shall not be used as primary sediment traps during construction. b. Filling or construction shall not be allowed in areas proposed for ponding in the Maplewood Drainage Plan, as determined by the City Engineer. c. Filling shall not cause the natural nutrient stripping capacity of the wetland to fall below the nutrient production of the wetland watershed for its projected development. d. Fill must be free of chemical pollutants and organic wastes. e. The property owners adjoining a wetland should be given the opportunity for an equal apportionment of fill. 5) Trees a. Development shall be designed to preserve the maximum number of healthy trees. This requirement shall not apply to diseased trees or where a forester certifies that thinning is needed for the overall health of a woodlot; in which case, a specific tree removal plan must be approved by the City. b. If trees are not cut, the density of trees shall be restored to that which existed before development, but in no case shall the applicant be required to raise the density above ten trees per acre, unless part of a required planting screen. Any trees required to be planted shall be varied in species, shall maximize the use of species native to the area, shall not include any species under disease epidemic and shall be hardy under local conditions. Tree diameters shall be at least two inches. 12 - 9/24 c. The applicant shall demonstrate that all grading which takes place will be conducted in a manner that preserves the root zone areation and stabil- ity of existing trees and provides an adequate watering area equal to at least one -half of each tree's crown cover. DIVISION 3, UTILITIES AND STREETS Section 9 -192. Utilities. a) Underground placing of utilities shall be required, unless economic, techno- logical or land characteristic factors make underground placement unfeasible. Economic considerations alone shall not be the major determinant regarding feasibility. b) Overhead crossings of protected waters, if required, shall meet the following criteria:_ 1) The crossings shall be adjacent to or part of an existing utility corridor, including bridge or overhead utility lines, whenever possible. 2) All structures utilized shall be as compatible as practical with land use and scenic views. 3) Right of way clearance shall be kept to a minimum. 4) Vegetative screening shall be utilized to the maximum extent that would be consistent with safety requirements. 5) Routing shall avoid unstable soils, blufflines or high ridges. The alter- ation of the natural environment, including grading, shall be minimized. 6) The crossings shall be subject to the site planning requirements set forth in this ordinance. c) Utility substations 1) All substations shall be subject to the site planning requirements set forth in this ordinance. 2) New substations or refurbishment of existing substations shall be compat- ible in height, scale, building materials, landscaping and signing with surrounding natural environment or land uses. Screening by natural means is encouraged. d) Pipelines 1) All proposed pipelines and underground facilities shall be subject to the site planning requirements set forth in this ordinance. 2) These facilities shall be located to avoid wetlands, woodlands or areas of unstable soils. 3) All underground placing of utilities or pipelines shall be followed by turf establishment. 4) All proposed pipelines shall be placed at least eight feet under a creek bed. 13 - 9/24 Section 9 -193. Streets. a) The grades of any streets shall not exceed seven percent, unless there is no feasible alternative as determined by the City Engineer. b) Roads shall be constructed to minimize impacts on the natural terrain and natural landscape. c) All roads shall be subject to the site planning requirements set forth in Section 9 -191. Section 2. Sections 36 -496 to 36 -549 (Critical Area Ordinance) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances are hereby rescinded. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect after its passage and publication. Seconded by Councilmamber Maida.Ayes - all. 3. Code Amendment: Driveway Setback (Second Reading) a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 572 AN ORDINANCE ALLOWING THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE DRIVEWAYS WITHIN THE FIVE FOOT SETBACK THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 29 -120 is amended as follows: Section 29 -120. Location. Driveways shall have a setback of at least five feet from the side or rear lot lines, except by written agreement with the owner of the adjacent lot or where the City Council or Community Design Review Board approves a lesser setback. In order to approve a driveway within the five foot setback, without approval of the adjacent owner, the City shall notify the adjacent owner at least ten days before the meeting. The Council must make a finding that the drive would have no adverse effect on the adjacent lot or owner. The Council shall include the following considerations in determining adverse effect: a. Snow storage b. Proximity of the drive to an adjacent house c. Difference in grade elevations d. Drainage e. Headlight glare f. Noise g. Berms Section 2. Section 29 -123 is added as follows: Section 29 -123. Enforcement 14 - 9/24 If the drive is illegally constructed within the setback, the City may require that the portion of the driveway that is within the setback be removed. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon passage and publication. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. I NEW BUSINESS 1. No Parking - County Road D a. Councilmember Bastian moved to table this item until the next meeting and instructed staff to notify the area business of the proposal. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 2. Rezoning: County Road B and VanDyke a. Manager Evans stated at the last meeting Council was questioned as to what had happened to the development proposal for the northwest corner of County Road B and VanDyke. If the developer wishes to proceed he must start with anew appl- cation. b. Mr. Manfred Recihert requested the Council rezone the property. c. Councilmember Bastian moved Council initiate a hearing to rezone the on the northwest corner of ounty Road B and VanDyke Street from R-3 an Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 3. Conveyance of Tax Forfeited Land: Maple Crest Park a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Ramsey County by Resolution dated September 17, 1984, classified as non - conservation land, certain land lying within the limits of the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, a copy of the classification resolution together with a list of the land classified has been submitted for approval of the classification in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Annotated, Section 282.01, sub. 1; and WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has determined that said land is required for park and recreation purposes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said classification of the land shown on said list as non - conservation land is hereby approved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the proper City officials be and hereby are author - ized to make an application for conveyance of said tax forfeited land for park and recreation purposes; and 15 - 9/24 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution and application for conveyance of said tax forfeited land in the Office of the Land Commissioner. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 4. Ordinance on Liquor License Bonds a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson moved first reading of an ordinance amending the for- feiture of bond requirements for liquor licenses to allow collection of cash up to the amount of e bond. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. Doris Calhoun, 2205 Arkwright a. Ms. Calhoun expressed the wishes of the neighborhood and herself regarding the proposed development of the,property on County Road B legally described as Lots 5 and 6, Block 36, Dawson's Suburban Acres. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to initiate a rezoning hearing for the above men- tioned property to R -1 based on Council's prior actions with own zoning proper Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 2. Jack Landsdahl, 1451 E. County Road B a. Mr. Landsdahl presented a petition signed by area residents requesting clean up of the vacant property east of 1451 E. County Road B. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 4. City Hall a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Maida made the following disclosure that her husband is employed by a mechanical engineering firm who works for several architectural firms, but he has no ownership, no policy making decision in the firm. b. Following a vote and discussion, Councilmember Wasiluk moved to hire the firm of Architectural Alliance for the City Hall project. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu; Councilmembers Anderson, Maida and Wasiluk. Nays - Councilmember Bastian. Council will meet with Architectural Alliance October 1, 1984 at 4:00 P.M. 5. Joint Powers Agreement - IDR Roseville a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. 16 - 9/24 b. Mayor Greavu moved to enter into an agreement with Roseville for $3,600,000 portion of Maplewoo s IDR allocation. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. Councilmember Anderson moved to waive the Rules of Procedures and extend the meet- ing past the deadline. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - Mayor Greavu; Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Maida. Nays - Councilmember Wasiluk. 6. Fees and Permits a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson moved first reading of an ordinance to increase the planning fees and moved tha a variance ees remain as stated. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. c. Councilmember Anderson introduced the followinq resolution and moved its 84 -9- 139 BE IT RESOLVED, THAT THE City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, established the following fees effective January 1, 1985: Amusement Park License $110.00 Bench Permit First Bench 30.00 Each Additional Bench 15.00 Bingo License For one Night /Wk. for 52 wks. 110.00 For two nights /wk. for 52 wks. 220.00 One night 10.00 Christmas Tree Sales Regular 105.00 Non - profit organization 80.00 Cigarettes & Tobacco 30.00 Coin - Operated Amusement Devices Per Location 110.00 Per Machine 27.00 Dog Kennels First Time 30.00 Renewal 10.00 Gambling License 110.00 Golf Course 110.00 ion: 17 - 9/24 Motels 1 - 15 units 45.00 16 - 35 70.00 36 - 100 110.00 over 100 135.00 Restaurant and /or Bakery Food Establishment 120.00 Catering Food Vehicle First Vehicle 60.00 Each Additional 30.00 Fleet License 170.00 Itinerant Food Establishment Limit 7 Days) First Day 30.00 Each Additional Day 15.00 Non - Perishable Food Vehicle First Vehicle 30.00 Each Additional 15.00 Fleet License 75.00 Potentially Hazardous Food Vehicle First Vehicle 85.00 Each Additional 40.00 Fleet License 250.00 Special Food Handling Establishment 40.00 Tavern License 220.00 Taxicab License Base Charge 30.00 Each Driver 10.00 Theater License Indoor 110.00 Outdoor 220.00 Contractor's License 60.00 3.2 Beer License j, On -Sale 100.00* Off -Sale 30.00* Temporary Food & Beer 15.00 /day LICENSES DUE JULY 1st Used Car Dealer 220.00 LICENSES DUE AUGUST lst 18 -9/24 Motor Vehicle Repair 40.00 Service Station 30.00 First Pump 45.00 Each Additional Pump 6.00 Trailer Rental 15.00 First 5 Trailers 15.00 Each Additional Trailer 2.00 LIQUOR LICENSES 5.00 Club Liquor License 300.00* On -Sale Liquor 4,285.00 Off -Sale Liquor 200.00* Sunday Liquor 200.00* Beer and Wine Seating up to 25 840.00 Each Additional 10 Seats 110.00 Maximum 2,230.00 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES Commercial and Industrial Revenue Note /Bonds Base Charge N of Bond Issue) 1% Minimum 5,000.00 Maximum 20,000.00 Amount Paid With Application 1,000.00 Liquor License Investigation Fee 335.00 Block Party License 15.00 Carnival License 110.00 Solicitor License Base Per Company 60.00 Additional Per Solicitor 30.00 Auctioneer License Annual 55.00 Daily 15.00 Pawn Shop 55.00 Pending Assessment Searches -6.00 Police Accident Report Copies 5.00 Cat and Dog Licenses Male 6.00 Female 6.00 Neutered /Spayed 3.00 19 - 9/24 Building Relocation 110.00 Community Design Review Board 60.00 Sewer Connection Permit (Per Connection) Residential Connection 30.00 Non - Residential Connection 45.00 Moving Permit 60.00 Wrecking Permit 30.00 Driveway Permit 6.00 Property Owner List 30.00 + 3.50 /name Mobile Home Permits 35.00 PUBLICATIONS (includes sales tax) Zoning Code 6.00 Platting Code 3.00 Sign Code 2.50 Comprehensive Plan 10.00 Zoning Map 3.50 City Map 3.50 Section Map 3.50 License Fee set by State Law. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk.Ayes - all. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. County Road B and McMenemy Discussed under J -1 2. State Building Code - Sprinkler Systems Discussed previously 3. D.N.R. a. Councilmember Anderson moved to notify DNR that they should not charge 3M Co. for the fish that killed in Battle Creek Lake based on the fact that did no "stock" the lake and no costs were incurred by them. Seconded by Councilmember Maida.Ayes - all. i 20 - 9/24 4. Commissioner's Meeting a. Councilmember Anderson requested Council to give some thoughts for establish - ing another Council /Commission meeting. 5. Variance Alternatives a. Councilmember Bastian made several suggestions regarding the granting of var- iances and the laws governing variances. b. Staff is investigating. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Wakefield Park Lease a. Manager Evans stated the lease for Wakefield Park had been approved approximately lZ years ago, but changes had to be made and it should be signed. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to approve the lease agreement for Wakefield Park as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 2. Bobeldyk a. Manager Evans stated the County is entering into litigation against Mr. Bobeldyk regarding his tri -plex on White Bear Avenue and inquired if Maplewood wished to join them. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to enter into a suit with the County against Mr. Bobeldyk. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. M. ADJOURNMENT 10:35 P.M. City Clerk 21 - 9/24 a i t. Manual Checks for .Sep_tember 1984 19E4 riTY 3F MAL.;W:0O CH =CK RvIjTR I 1 AMOUNT VEND ^R ITE DESCRI 253P5 °-'L 9/2F/84 1905.0 NlRTya'STrRA BELL T7LEPH3wES PHDN;S 253 r.5 L 11`9/26 /94 1 NDRTlWr-ST= RN BELL TEL- 26 l+71 1x/71/84 23 *04-Moil ST TR ' S SURTAX SURTAX FIRL PPL 26.= x+71 r1 /84 23. '94 MN ST TREZS SURTAX SURTA t47 -* 261 K2..:9IR /k 145.'x`0 KAN R0SEtARY P/P DEDUCT 145 *j0 251 N y / /fy S x'51. D MINN S TREAS lCTDR Vci LZC DqL 261 X0 5 9/ ? I Q 4 5r •hT'AN STS!! T TREA SU R7R 0R I vEMR L C POL C ° L 261 moq R4 34: U MI AN ST TREAS M'T r V = L 261M 4 344.J D Mlh*l STt4TL TRFASU R DP1VcKS L L 5 ,7G5 *: 0 1611 2;.3z.J'ACC PrCVPLt PGVT CCLLECTI'V AGCrvCY 32 .13 262C45 9 /2_F 4 12•x^GISpATCH FLKS 12 J R 262 25 9 /Z /64 1bD.''NE NN CNTY CH: =FS TRAVEL TR;IVI":G 16 0 9 , R4 7 *33 M N STATE TREAS M^T 1l L °8t 7,013.33 ZA3C4j 9/26/84 105.50 CL7RK OF COURT CNTY DRI V =RS LIC 105.50 263MoS w9 / 2P /P4 4885.R5 MINN STATE TRc «S MCTCR VcH •lIC PF 263No9 vy /2IP4 273.00 Mi AN STATE. TRE4SURER DKI V'P,S LTC FBL 5.158.95 + C"ECK R -R VENG= ITEM OLSCRIPT:O' ORTRWESTERN 8r—LL TEL EP H3NE3 IYF 4 CITY Or MAFLE' 6J ^J T= L NE hORT4W EST :BELL T LEPti0 % =S CH =CK 1 DATE AMOUNT NORT- iW'STF-RN BOLL T'LEPH3 263W5L L 9 /28/R 4 33990 263N5L w9 /2F /E4 39,30 Zb'';5`9 2300 NIRTi u= ST= RN 8 LL T} L _FHL"o'N 203 #Li 912E181 39. oft 263N 51 C9 /28 /F4 19.5: 2o3N v' 9/2F/84 359.01 263N5:j9/2% 9 /84 3S. QD 263 ".5L j9/28/34 39.U 263h5(2 ah.09 /?e/b4 67.P5 203'15„U9 /2R /84 R9 .C5 Z53'45.:9/23184 81.ar 796.31 2645 %i:9 /28/S4 75.x:0 75 *-'0 264523 9/28/84 101.76 1:01, `6 264mcG 9/2184 4 96 33 *4J 164 May 9 5 F 4 2450 A 4 f 7R.40 264 N y/ ? / 8 4 2 * 4Q. 2E4t 912E/E4 2.40 264 N 19 /26 /84 421 *17 2 6 *,ice.C9 /2n /R4 421.17 - 265 33 5 9/28/R4 10'.:'' it5516 "U9 33* 1 33.95 2o551 l U9/2F/8 4 57 579.60 205 51 e-L9/2::/84 3...0 3,00 t f 265 51 9 •:9/23/84 55.CD f C"ECK R -R VENG= ITEM OLSCRIPT:O' ORTRWESTERN 8r—LL TEL EP H3NE3 NIRT4W EST --- R N BELL T= L NE hORT4W EST :BELL T LEPti0 % =S NORTyrrST =RN BELL TEL= PHON NORT- iW'STF-RN BOLL T'LEPH3 N*) RTHw EST ERh BELL TiL_PONE N ^RT4 WEST R N EELL T= LZPt -ON Ec Nl "TwJTST -- R h BELL TEL= PfJ3NES NIRTi u= ST= RN 8 LL T} L _FHL"o'N NI PTE! 4 E h B TEL'PH0N c N RT44EST.P N B' LL TLL Er!-+Ot'ti =S h ^RT-1 WT ST =R N E =LL T'LEP V 0 N' F . MN Mr OA TPAVEL TK:.I'y G [ RC DT330N ARROWJOn TRI AW L TRATLiv'. kG Mj "IN' 1+AT:. TREAS M^TCK VEH L C II'iN STkT= TR=AS C ?I47-KS L_C '?L N.S.P UTILITIES N. %C..Q UTILITIES K . S UTILTTIE3 fy .S.P UTILITIEr C+-'AN4 SS3` THEQ TKr PROG?AMS COCA C 0L ri0 u SUP PiIE S FAS "ICN LINE FRC G SUP :L'_F'S HAAG MATT REFUND JACOBSENS APPLE ORC SPECIAL EV =`JTj 1984 CITY OF MAPLE UC0D CHECK Rc'uiSTFR CHECK N3*LATE AMOU NT VENDOR I T= M DE SC RI PT' ON 55, A I 2b5E64 9/28/84 1 E.MrnLOYEF .EN CLAIMS DENTAL CLAIM: 25 4,09.9 JvTNN STOATS TREASURER MCT V 44 LI! BBL 265M69 9/28./84 365. 4'0 M NN STATE' TREA3UR= R 0p S LIC 3L 4 +374.R6 *y is r 265 K 511 9 /2 /84 3.'3 N.S.'UTIL T = S 265'x, 4;9/ I R 4 2.43 A..•P UTILI'A. cS f? 265 % P-u CQ 12 E4 2.40 N o So:D UTI LT TI r- S f 265!,x';..9 /[8l84 421.17 No So UTILITIES 2h5 -. L 2 Q9l _Q72.3_S c'N ..UTILITT.zS 265 r,9/2;;/R4 X4.11 A.S.R UTILITIES 2651Q y /2 X84 403.N.S,p UT&I LiTr 916.''R 266 Al 9 2E 4 335. 00 AFSCM7 A DIJ S_ P3L 256 1 + 5 912k 5.32 AFSCM'uNI:.!1 0J DEL 341.22 206!x:9/ /8 213.56 A T 8i TcLL.sa. *ryi 213.56 x 266C35 y /2k / gw 14 t 351 .53 CITY CN TY CR U'ti 14.357.5D 26s.'1 5 1. - /2 194 2 6 . s2 C MA REF =? .D C*. P81 268:15 9l2 4 505.'4 1CkA EF = R c0 C i: a31 3 26eM35 912g14 22Q.75 MN BENt FIT ASSN r/R LEOUST 2.8$.75 + 26 8 M 51 Ig4 14 46.71 PN FEO SAVINGS FW FPL 208 P5 2 9/2-6/84 337.50 WN F:O =rRAL SA VIN.GS US SAVINGS PBL w A M NT 140849 21 310.-- 31 v. - j ^ 7 7089. ?1 15.77 9,23 25.:. + 5 q '765 3 5 85..;J 260 -W 345. 5 * 3,965. R7 4 1143.46 E- 91 09.33 * 2i.i. 98.60 298.65 * 1 57. 43 157.43 * 2 2• 49.7D * 6 995.46 83 , 832.1 F 9. , on. 90 * 818.64 2F i 050.: -10 CHECK REGISTr' R V =NDO ITEM D J C+RIP -JN MN MUTUAL LIFE INS INSUROLNC P6L M*i ST COMM /REV SWT P3L 410 ST R , T -RL MI. `JT D'F R ED C Cf-1P R RL [j MN ST RET?RE4r%. T D--FERKf J Cr. t . oL MN't STATE TREAS MCT JR VET L' C P8L NI N 3TA T TREASU R'R 3NR L C P .5 L MI STATE TREASURER L"v1 LiC ?PL MINN STATE TREASUR R 3RI V = lit. S L IC L 71 W! STATE TREAS S/S SI P 1 STITE TREAS S)S S/3 Ft S T . T' 4F MI 1{C.T rR Y W IT ='? JAY /P CEOJ - L JdISC DEPT REVT` UE SNT ahL N.=.S.A r- OGRAMS NJPT& W =ST ASPHALT CINTRACT QYM 19F4 CITY JF MAFL= k ^-)L NORT4wEST ASPHALT CONTRACT °YM CHECK N%DATE 26th t-1 9 /P4 5. 2 i /2 4 266 M a 9/2 A 26. amtos 9/e 2Eto NO 9/2L/P4 266 !'oo9 9/26!3 + 266 y6,o q /Zk/ 84 4 9 4 26 !, 1,.:9129 84 20 , •11.19/2 /f4 2 3 9/2rw 18 268 L 9/2? l54 266125 ylZw!Py 26y521 «9/28/ %4 2695c1 9 /28 /84 269 522 4W2P/84 209522 J9 /2P /P4 269M2 (.:69 / 2S /84 A M NT 140849 21 310.-- 31 v. - j ^ 7 7089. ?1 15.77 9,23 25.:. + 5 q '765 3 5 85..;J 260 -W 345. 5 * 3,965. R7 4 1143.46 E- 91 09.33 * 2i.i. 98.60 298.65 * 1 57. 43 157.43 * 2 2• 49.7D * 6 995.46 83 , 832.1 F 9. , on. 90 * 818.64 2F i 050.: -10 CHECK REGISTr' R V =NDO ITEM D J C+RIP -JN MN MUTUAL LIFE INS INSUROLNC P6L M*i ST COMM /REV SWT P3L 410 ST R , T -RL MI. `JT D'F R ED C Cf-1P R RL [j MN ST RET?RE4r%. T D--FERKf J Cr. t . oL MN't STATE TREAS MCT JR VET L' C P8L NI N 3TA T TREASU R'R 3NR L C P .5 L MI STATE TREASURER L"v1 LiC ?PL MINN STATE TREASUR R 3RI V = lit. S L IC L 71 W! STATE TREAS S/S SI P 1 STITE TREAS S)S S/3 Ft S T . T' 4F MI 1{C.T rR Y W IT ='? JAY /P CEOJ - L JdISC DEPT REVT` UE SNT ahL N.=.S.A r- OGRAMS NJPT& W =ST ASPHALT CINTRACT QYM N IRT4WEST ASP4 AL T CONTRACT PY" NORT4wEST ASPHALT CONTRACT °YM ME TRQ CIA STE C CNTR3L SAC PFL MOUNT 283.53 27.769.5 C * 5, 195.5 38Z.c 5 f 6.4 95 .'' 8 F,629.1 3 15 ,124 *21 95.D 95.3C 5,13Q. =: 242 u 5 9431.:;D 1 91969?? 23.94 1 , 221.72 1 •287.': ! 1 X787', R 3,x59.75 91.:'.) 39949. 6.429.1 8 439.,:0 6986?.1 8 t CHECK R;:GTST =R VENOCR ITEF OESCRIP':Ot METRO VAST= CGNTR3L SAC R31. MTNN ST TREASUR =R M?^TOR VEH L;C PE M4N STATE TR= ASUR =R rjF,I VEF.S L1C * cL M*I ST TRT4 -S' p='R A PER 4 PAL M'4 ST TRESS P "Fm A VERA PB CLERK OF COURT COITY LIC PSL M='TRO Q pFA M TRAVEEL TR °I" K f N STA T_ TR .." S MST =. N' AN STA T- TK_AS MOTOR V =H LI C P= ti ST TRE=,S SURT %X I- FF.L M`J ST TRE.AS SURTAX SJRTA* P=AL CAr.E BNI114L A 1 M P. L C O'hTLi' CL M'F NN ST AT_ TRE4 S MCT,- VET L C a N:' V STA T:: TRcAS MST OR V = l: C F MINN STAT_ TR='AS MCTCR VE#- LTC Pf VI NN. STA T= TREKS MOTOR V cH L C DL - 1984 ?"TTY 3F 14AFLE6100 t CHECK %f 3a TE A 2 69 mZ 9 /28 / 8 4 269Mo9 9 /26 /34 269ro9 9/2E/E4 269 75 9 /2 c 19-4 269 ?A, 76 y / 2 1 4 27 D 45 1 ? 4 2 Nt S 1 /_ 1!Q4 27'V71 1.,/ 2/:'X71 1 1!E 271x'30 1 Li 1 271 M 9 1 1 /84 271 tab 9 1 /C 1 /84 272 yo 9 11 /t.1 / F 4 27 2 q 9 4 MOUNT 283.53 27.769.5 C * 5, 195.5 38Z.c 5 f 6.4 95 .'' 8 F,629.1 3 15 ,124 *21 95.D 95.3C 5,13Q. =: 242 u 5 9431.:;D 1 91969?? 23.94 1 , 221.72 1 •287.': ! 1 X787', R 3,x59.75 91.:'.) 39949. 6.429.1 8 439.,:0 6986?.1 8 t CHECK R;:GTST =R VENOCR ITEF OESCRIP':Ot METRO VAST= CGNTR3L SAC R31. MTNN ST TREASUR =R M?^TOR VEH L;C PE M4N STATE TR= ASUR =R rjF,I VEF.S L1C * cL M*I ST TRT4 -S' p='R A PER 4 PAL M'4 ST TRESS P "Fm A VERA PB CLERK OF COURT COITY LIC PSL M='TRO Q pFA M TRAVEEL TR °I" K f N STA T_ TR .." S MST =. N' AN STA T- TK_AS MOTOR V =H LI C P= ti ST TRE=,S SURT %X I- FF.L M`J ST TRE.AS SURTAX SJRTA* P=AL CAr.E BNI114L A 1 M P. L C O'hTLi' CL M'F NN ST AT_ TRE4 S MCT,- VET L C a N:' V STA T:: TRcAS MST OR V = l: C F MINN STAT_ TR='AS MCTCR VE#- LTC Pf VI NN. STA T= TREKS MOTOR V cH L C DL - d 15 4 CITY afr MACLT-WCDD CHECK 1= li pF;TST =R CHEC N ''. L) #-%T VEN 0"IT_F 0L3%C'R1 T.0 272 ": 1 /1 /R4 86 7 N.S.P.UT1 L TIE a 2'7i 1/54 82.76 N•Ssr UTILi TI 2l2 Q:10 1 /R4 175.45 V.f• ?.UTILITILS 274.28 # 141,691.49 FUND 31 TQTAL G =N_R L fi4S.x9 U1 03 TrrAL HYD NT LrA' C =: 69y95.46 FU "40 11 TOTIL FA. K 0EV .LCPIV N 83,00 23 *1 8 FUND 1 ?.TCT -L STK i S S 1 3 rUN 92 TOTAL Y °ALL F r :T 1 •C 3 31 FUlF)94 T9TAL CAN' L = EL F» I' S 247 TOTAL NECESSARY EXPEND TURF S SINCE LAS COUNCIL MEETIN`3 t E t r in i 41 r k Y E F 14 t Accounts Payable October 8 ,19 8 4 19P4 CITY Of PA FLEE 1C CNEC K CI 7 AMOU 27446E CS /26/ E 75. - ;0- 2744fE 75 *?C 284:15 ;;S /26 /F 16 C 2e4L4i,C 16.x^ 2 4'L k6 91261F4 621.55 621.55 2t41 5 9/261EZ 175.'' 17.5. 2e4151 09/26/84 25• ='C 25. =C 0 284164 9/26/ 4 350 ^ 35.x:0 93 1ib4219 9/261E4 11 .45 11.55 2 E4 3'1 ;L 9/ 26 r F 4 21 .30- 2b4315 L9/26/f4 62915 40 5 2F4117 CS /2f /II 350.rO 21431 7 C 9 26 i E I 1 GC . '"t' 450.30 Page 1 C1-ECK F EGT STrR VADG? ITEM uES CC, I AFT CA f-;ACR1 CKE 9cA wGES I-_ X0 ICKE BEA 2E WAG:.S hrPORUN SHIRLEY PUFKE AWA MPCS rOUIPMENT C CRPOPAT E RISK MAN G FR'SKY ":TS M =EHAN JAMES MEPLN i-FLN SUPPLs7S VEr C GNTn "CT =Y4 SLPFL' =E CA "J 7 - ALLCWANCE I Nr;TH CENTRAL CONSTR SUPPLIES C T PARTS CC SUPFL:ES %EH G T P CG SLPFL: E` VEH FCEERT PARTIN CCKTRACT FYI; F06ER7 MARTIN CCNTRACT FIP t. 19F C I1Y OF MA FLE `COO CHECK AC. DATE AMOUNTq GCCDY ~AR AUTO SEFV SI.PFL +FS vE E4* PO G0 CY = A R t. U T C SEP V C ChT# 4C? FY's 28i 52 284355 2b4355 5/2E/ E4 194,42 + IC6. 2E436F 5 /26I FAMALtY ERI T T G r I *T:hG 141 .65 1t4?57 9t6f4 7.131 JCS -hSON PARY WAGES 2F44...r 9 J26J F4 7.7 n-TC'CLtY MAGJCRY GES 77 ZP441 5 y /2E /E4 6 •r 0 EDDY BETTY w 5GiS fS. 3 2b4416 9/26/84 6 9,m0l C L IN SKI JCYC=WAGS 69.rr 214417 S126 /fj SAJ:COUIST SIBC_E Wt.GES 7 8 . C + 2c441 F L9 /25/ E4 f KLEEr rMra iAGE 7E•i C * ct4419.S/26If4 f 6T=GSRl ELSIE AUES 76. FO 28442i 70 0 ?1 SC }M IOT JOYCE WAG ES 7c.^C 184421 9 /Z6/E f LECNAF'C LYKETIr-i GES lg 184422 Z9/26/f4 f ER?'CKSCN ^NYLL:S WASE T8.7C 2E44 'CS /2E f P CkCNA N GU AE AG 6AGc S 284424 ES /26 84 f 28442 `.r5126/E4 f CHECK PECIS?CR VENOC I TEP CL3 CrR 1P T ION 197.72 GCCDY ~AR AUTO SEFV SI.PFL +FS vE E4* PO G0 CY = A R t. U T C SEP V C ChT# 4C? FY's 28i 52 154.42 LAVTr-S WATER EGUIP SUFPLTES 194,42 + IC6.FINN BEAST S %EH 1 X6.74 141 .65 FAMALtY ERI T T G r I *T:hG 141 .65 7.131 JCS -hSON PARY WAGES E7.1 3 7.7 n-TC'CLtY MAGJCRY GES 77 6 •r 0 EDDY BETTY w 5GiS fS. 3 6 9,m0l C L IN SKI JCYC=WAGS 69.rr 78.t SAJ:COUIST SIBC_E Wt.GES 7 8 . C + T8.C KLEEr rMra iAGE 7E•i C * 76.SC 6T=GSRl ELSIE AUES 76. FO 70 0 ?1 SC }M IOT JOYCE WAG ES 7c.^C 7E. nc LECNAF'C LYKETIr-i GES lg 78.''C ER?'CKSCN ^NYLL:S WASE T8.7C 76.00 P CkCNA N GU AE AG 6AGc S A 5' ply 15E4 CITY IF MAFL:i.CD CHECK pcGISTZ' R CHECK C•LhTL'IVOL i7 VEADC°TON DESCKIP1 *C' 76 *'-*'G + 2 c4 42 f 9 /c6 / f 4 76. _'?VES S ANDY WASLS 76.70 264427 S /2E /F f • ?C Fr,IGG- LINQA4tic.S EF,O fid44_e 5 26 EA 74. "C U*CHQL1 .UDY w GAS 74.70 2t4425 9 /26 /F4 P2 •: C SLFAN KATHY w GiS. 82.10 2L-443 L9 /26 /F 4 76.. C H oLCH ON JOAN OE s.Gf. 7E " ZE4431 X91261 E4 7 • J PA LP MYPTLEE WAG i S 7 * c _4 S 1c t / E A 74 . _,RCH;.LL F..1F.. r G:...+t _LL . 7 - ....0 114433 y ^ /Fc F2 fE r_R A.i LSZJN G T J AG ES 82 8 2f44.34 7 • - C FCCGORSKI A, MELLA INN 284435 9/ 261?4 7r. G HALS POTTY WIGES 7^.x"3 2r443F 9/261F4 74.."n hAIS T+= CD ^r.E AyES 7 4 cF4437 9 /c6 /f4 7 _.7 ti i-PERSON E_T7Y SAG..S 2c44 -A 5/261f 4 6f•..LCK MILDRED WAGS" 6P. 'C i P 4 4 .30 19 S 2 e F _D_R ICK? _N n.7A WAGES 6R "0 k8444%.C S/ <E /E 76• . C'R _SCH_R L RRA w;,GE.. 76 n4 214441 9/261E4 76•"0 EERCLUNC 5ETTY S iAGES 76•''C 2f4442 9126 / 14 FAX ANNA WAGES 68. , .0 t i841#43 L5 E /f4 E5•..0 DYERS JE$!:4AGL.S 85. ^0 124 1SF4 CITY GF NAFL7- 00C CHECK R IS7 7 R CFCvK h C.C T AIFOUNT VENDOR ITEM PLO ESCRlFT10 - iiF4444 C91i6 /F4 Pt."C FLLq CCRFINE GAGES F r . ri, t444 i9 /26 /F4 7F • 3 MCCPF KATHERII WAGES 7 8 204446 5/2L/F4 FC. C MCCONALC tAARGAFET WAGES i64447 Sl2E1 C'MrLLET DCLCR =S AG::.S PL • 1.f cz!4448 9/26 E 74 .38 FCSEURGM ANNE WAGES 74 .3 F i8444S x/26/84 76.,[.L 1ED'R MARY LCU 76.x0 ZF445W x91261 F 74 C C LASKI C, ANS w4 S 74. ^ 284451 4CSI2E 73: G A ,133R= CCpCT lY GE 73 • -'C is 284452 9 /26/84 74. ~Ci 4"FDF.N PAT WAGES 74. r 2E4453 S /2E /F 8C . ^C COTTRUL JOAN MAGIS e 284454 C91261F 7C•'1C AEPA--AMSCN KAFr AGEc 7G•rC T f 22445 5 09/26 /E4 F5. 0 LOFGREN CL.CRES I WAGES 85•x£ 28445E 926/f4 FC•"C OLSON MAYIAE r WAGES 8C•rC 2dl8 P'.''C FART SLGF.:D 16AG.S194457S F_.:.G t6445F 91'26 18 4 7C. ^'.'LUTTaSLL ShIRL'Y UAGE 7C•C'lid 28445S 9/26 /84 7'1 •- C AREUCKLE JAC WASES 71 . - D G 2 F44E:.L91261F1 73.31 6AFNER CARCLINE W GES 73. 301 2F440 73. CG AF,EUCKLf CM ARLLNc iiA &cS 7 3 . N] 3 I? 2x4462 C S /2f / F A 7 f G MTL Ur- R AL ICE f w4G =S 1SP4 CITY iF MAFL_k(..D CHEC RECIST_R CH lk t*Q.4 TE a OUNT VEhOC I TE F DcSLR: =';Ot 7F 0 284463 C9/26/E l 7C.C AtiCERSN IREV=4:.6 fS 7C * CD cE44E4 S/26/E4 7E ,_G ERCC.,Y JGRIS G_.. Ck 2t44E5 C9 /261EI 81070 L ITE , BA EA.,P W A CES c Zc4406 2 :,1f4 77,..E 7FCWO CON ,.TnICIA W G = 77.C cr44E7 2E /E f ?..:C EuFTth KIRIDEK 6 A G E.. 67.'D f ct44b S /ct/_75,"C H= DRICKS 9EA GCS 5.-0 Zt44tS 9/t5/E4 7 C75 *CX OAHL EV `Y!W I-GES 75.''C 28447_512E E4 69._C_TT:_L KATHLN W A G_S 690-C 2E4471 S12f /F4 E7 C:CKSON H =LEA JEAN W4;S 67. ^0 2t447Z 9/2t/E4 E'.' 0 SCHhETOE LCRF.AI`iE_WAGcS c.447_9 /c61E4 S.'_C MATH= kS ELL tn WAG_Z E5.2 264474 QJ261E4 6 7-0 ''C EIS WAGES 6 7 r. 0 1z4 4 7 5 9126 / E4 7R.'''0 ALLEN AGNES A ,G.. - 7 '' ^F -;, 2E4476 9126 / E E.O M ISt-A JAt 7T WAG =S 284477 CS /2` /E RLANCK RtTRICIA W Gc "S f.rC 284478 19/261E4 660 rC CU -LLPAN ALCFEY s tiAGE. r f 264479 9126/E4 79. ^0 CEHEN MILDRED WAGES 2E442 C S /26/ f 74.00 FA STNER Cr LCR IS WAG:.S E 74 . -2 0 r 3 Ply CHECK PE. IST . R fitAOLNT 1984 CITY CF NA- LEtC3C I TC N L'L. J C M r T j1 C!-ECte C•D,7E WAGES 2E44F1 12t 1 14 Z844a2 9/26! E4 t 2644? ? eu 2844E4 SI2E /F 5' PtIE S Z8446 5 9 /2b /E 2E44Ff 5/2b/f4 CFtti 2E44E7 SI2E /E4 2t4486 ASSCC ATE:= BAG CC c=CURITY TV- ri c844S 28445_' BOLCT FA!NT SUFFL +CS 2c44S1 S /2f1 184492 5J2E/ E4 SUFFL ES %Et LCD. . ri 2E445.4 CE HAVT-h LIN04 p,FUlr 284495 26/E4 1E445f r.5/26/f4 rcFtttC 2E44S7 "C91i6 11449 S FFL_ _ 1e4 L9 S/26/ F t CHECK PE. IST . R fitAOLNT VEN r C I TC N L'L. J C M r T j1 CE11Y CFF4A WAGES 6C95E LINA:.CT MARY WIGSS 6t•s6 2, ?C A -1 BUSIASS S= RVICr 5' PtIE S 2 QC * 1 5r.r0 fhEEPSCN 'R ICK"zCN CFtti 150 .:' 79,45 ASSCC ATE:= BAG CC c=CURITY TV- 75,45 49•2 3 BOLCT FA!NT SUFFL +CS 4Q, 2? 2t. CJ C TCCLZ SUFFL ES %Et LCD. . CE HAVT-h LIN04 p,FUlr mss_.. 1E...0 C:.LES - A .,uLEh:.rcFtttC 16.0 5C. ?5 C •C•HCY C3 S FFL_ _ 50.75 I01 CRFG-R RCEEFT EFU'C 1 D" r 400*• O E.E.'•CC1tTrLCT FYI 4cC2 }0C2 10.': C Cglh!)4CFE i ` aM` c F t!`'D IC. C I-AWPE CAPOL R =FtNC 16. 12. ^H AAhULA ROD c EF IiJD 160 PIN C,I- ENSLFY FAT F:FUNO' 16, "C 16.'= C tCLCK M ILCREC i FI ' CR. 16•C 100 0 JANISC R &TA R_F L 'N0V o • r16. ,_JCNjWSCh D °3RCTt V R DFL. Ply P; 7 t 1984 CITY OF MAFLr_ 4V`D A"TL FUS INE.SS SYST M RSAC . I CHECK N ^.CAT£AMOUNT EMT iticT,:LCT` F IETT= CRECCnY EMT I "BSI FtCTCr 6 • V EwT i RSTF LCTC 2 ,6 45:.1 X9/26/84 10 C 1^.rC FEFI:N 245 %_Z9/26IF4 565.'! 5 REFLNE 245;.2 S /2E/ E [1 •762• F2 REFLNO cI- L)PKA 0&;_'ti JS PEFLN ccCFrU 2,:.27.G7 REFt;ALZJ SAC 2,-45L3 9 /2o /p4 59.RC BOOK 5 9 . 'T f 2 }4 4 1-9/26 /F 59. C c9w RC 2x45 ` 5 2d / F4 15. 0 19,C 2 64 5:. 6"9 t 26 / F 4 16._C ii 2845--7 S/2 /f 1 100, 1^."C ii2a45*S /261 E 13. 75 13.75 f 26451.5 9/26/84 32,silf 0w 2F451..9/20 /F4 16.:0 1E. 0 2t4511 26If4 10.0 1C.''C 2f4:12 9126 /F i 10'2 0 1D•"0 284515 L9126/F4 425.w0 r 425. =C 214514 LS /'6 /f4 1.5C 1.5 0 r 284515 9/2E /E 4 12.5C 12.50 2f4t6'2 512 39. 2 2f4,A'W2 C9/261E4 39.83 79.65 CHECK R EG'_ STE R V_NDCR ITEM CE.Si,KIFZC' MAUER CRA+ G cFLIE A"TL FUS INE.SS SYST M RSAC . I NAIL PUSi °i£SS SYSTCM Rr* AC:.F: FAYFTT= AN EMT iticT,:LCT` F IETT= CRECCnY EMT I "BSI FtCTCr SUET OF C 3CUPT'NTS EwT i RSTF LCTC r' I:C L M SAURCKA R£fUk O crNMT T 2 KAREN FEFI:N ITAC7Y HAkRY REF'L THCNAc* hELEN REFLNE T 1ERIOY fELEN R£FUN EOCUN LINDO REFLNO cI- L)PKA 0&;_'ti JS PEFLN ccCFrU 90PESKY STEVE REFt;ALZJ SAC FAPSSY CCUNTY CFF.0 SLFFL. Is UR FAN LAND IN SS BOOK ACF0 -MTA SLFFL IES ACRO- M INN SLFFL T Ec i 1S. 4 CT TY OF MA FLc _. V CCD CHECK REGIS'ER CNECI( KO D; TE AP3LN TE oEc rTo' 284A65 5/261F t 29060 AiihALS ALTO S.EFY __R PtIR M ,TAT VE1 2E4AE5 CSAf /t[21975 APNALS ALTC SFPV REPAIR PANT VEt 284:65 6 /F1 41.75 9kALS ALTO SERV EpATP NA'AT dE 2F4At9 S /2f /f4 F4.75 ARIALS AV'iC S:"KY PA NA;T VE 264AoS 9/26/ E 3 <.1 ARALS ALTOO c ay 0 : PPA ':y. 2t41 tc LS /2t f[4E0 FL ARKALS 4LTC S:RV REP A' .TFT Vr 264, 65 9 /2b /p4 7989c AR ALTO S-RV P,E'PAI R MAI?IT Vv' 264s6S f .QL ARNAL! ALTI SFRV R'PA HAIhT T .6 V 2 4r6 Q /26 / E4 21.75 AK*ALS 4LTC SrA R Z p R NAIrT y_ it4A65 S /2E /F 21.75 fRfALS ALTC ccFy R' MAIJk VE 543.,0 2 t4E7 3 y /fbl f 4 1 Se° 70 BAFT JAM: S C INSPE.CTCR 1 ,983.x'0 2t4E15 S /2t /fit 103.23 EATTERY T_RC 6tiSE SU; :PLTE.S %Ff 214 5 1y /2t 4 z41. _g T E SEA: TK Y T _RE Wt....SLPPL : =S VE4 144. F1 + 284EL7 9/2t/f 136. 4 FF"FG TUBS =TN SLPPL wE.S 136,'r-4 i3 2F4F 4 9126/E 1 15.44 BOARD CF WATER CCM1 UTIL +TIES 18.44 c4E4F S /2f /F [3..24,,. 3 F CYER TRI CK zlKTS SLPFL'ES tiE 24_.33 f$ F 2, 4C2 f 61 E4912 1 56. ?4 CANVA FFID REPA Q SUPPLIES 156.Q4 2E4C33 y /26 /F4 72.?5 CAPITOL SJFFt,SUPFL1 S 72.75 + 2t4C3f 9/261E4 19287•F0 Can£ ANIMAL CCATROL ANIMAL C(:PT:;CL IY 2c4C36 9/26/F4 1 9287OFC CARE ANIMAL CCNTROL ANIMAL CCnTR CL t 19 4 CITY uF MAFL; i,CP)3 CHEC R = ' -c RE GI CHECK hC.0,•IE AMCUhT VENOC?ITEM CES- tom i 1t i o4C3F 2t4C_ 4 9tc6 /Fw 44,55 44955 CLFAN ST_ -p P S S ,. R9.1C : CLF'A'4 STEP RUGS FUGS C L Z' N 2r4 (3c Lv126/ F4 f1.25 C= NSTGtE P?CO%JCTQ C'-SLPPL j _ &e1,?5 * ct 4 CC:) r 4(SU 4 9tc6t w 5C72 OLD TCH&T "jlSM TSSI ,'Y SUQFL ES WCh 2 b4i5 4 126/f4 w c4b.1 b CLLICH -& TF4hSF1SSI0IN'T-'clrU L t r CLLTCH&TF Ch SIPPL348,66 lfrf i IZ4C5 5 261F t w1PS.4c CCFY 0UPLILAT y6 Li L:CAT:N C `.1 fS.42 : tt *f i I 284C5 r2 /ti 11 0 C ,.LL: NS K NNETH OFF.C- SL -FL11.53 i 4C95 b 8.43 CU CE Ls4cy cSLFPLIE_ 2f4E3.. 2 t4C3l L9 t26I k4 S /E /F[ 1 12.66 CALCD j SUF L 7E16,9$..1 LCD SLFFL:ES55F + 284037 z9 /2 5^EATA DIs"' TCH,A,G r r rrSI S77 ; r r lttlRi *i 7C I I w c84C4 L f4(4 y /7i t 5t<< /f 5 25 6 t- cCEFT O PUBLIC SFTV i# ALL COM NA, 14D. `C EEFT LF FuEl1C S.F7Y;r AUG CU MAA565.6 F i3 lil I3 i rt 24E43 284Z43 5 /26/f4 9 / / E 4 S tTAMD1VC RMOIOT ^R P S it H -Sl PL .E Ec'6 45 •'C t0 _AMINO +LIATrR LPFLTEc WE1?S ' RAO f 1984 CITY F ChECI C• 4 AvCUN'T tR•f 44T L .T' ct4:. 7'r' .- T r i 1,EE4.:'3 SZi1 = 12r•, 2t4 ES:SI E4 2250 , 225 C 2t4C42 s 2d E2,m Pi 7 2t4C4.9/26/E4 6.50 iE4t4' 2t4C45 9126 6.55 i'4C45 Ii%.X2.32 2 E4G4 =.t5126 ! E4 221 . 3E 24 C-4 5 9126 E 4 F2.32 2e4C45 S /Zf /2 '• 0 415.:0 Zc4G46 S/2 /E [31.71 31 0 ' 1 tt4 C4S 9/761 3.44 3.4 4 t 2d4C57 946/t4 7530 753. ?5 2c4G5E C9/261k4 12.96 2 4G5 9/ 2 64 4 2c4C5 6.73 24.12 2t4 C 26 7950 7.50 CHECK REIG IST =R vnocC AT. CEZ i Tp0N i i•rr ter. fS_ SF0TF'RS 8 SON: EVtNS FAP?Y GENEP ATOR SPECIALTY GJCC -YEAP TIRE C0 CCCCYf7AQ 71RF CC C?COY FA R Ti FE C C CCCYF'AP T f E CC OGDY - -AP TiFtE CC GC.DYEAR TIFE CC COC I - C GE FUI Nr- FA R7S G3 HFR BEARING CO GRACE OU A NE C CREL JANET GREW JANET C= cw JANET ERLSEPS FOY HANK CUFFL_ES VEhICLE i•Lt " SLFPL CU L 1 .... r SLPFL .ES VET! SLrFL.ES ti =t SLPPLIFS BEN SUPPLIES 4EF Sc LP P L : ES %I --- H SUPPLIES I ;.H SIPPLIES SELF FLIF S CCNSUj T C ,hSP FRLG S UP P L c QOC SUFFLIES FRCC SLFPLIEc So UPrL 1ES 1984 CITV OF PAFLE CHICK REEZS'r_R CFfCK ?C. L.TE AMOUNT V=NCCR ITEM CESCA.I?TIO itff 2s4:2f 9/26/84 23!'2 IMERLINE Lc EEFViC "c 23!72 i E 415 338.94-7N TL- YCUGH 0 I SLrPL'E5 VE# 2t4 15:._91261E4 338!94 7N IL- H3UG4 CIV SLPFL'ES tiro 2 4I5E 9/2 319.INTL -H0"UGH OIV S. LPPLIES VEH 315.76 • 2b4.3 :9 /2b/5E ..: JJ TROPI- .S SU:PFL ES PFCG CC ! r C 284 J32 S / ;_6 E 4 2660-1 E J. t. S N IE .-Y CC i S F FL . rS 284., 32 2 9725. +6 J !L. SHIELY CC SUPPL IES 1rt4 *t 2 , .54 24%.53 20,3 J( -NSCN ;AKDALL TRA % I;AIK'I G 2E453 71t6 /FL 5l L'131 -iNSCN QAAL'ALL FUEL CIL 7.33 f 24K55 S /2t/ t i4. F5 KNCxLUNF R SLPPL'ES 2b40 5 9 /iE / E4 83.42 X%, Co LUMPr F SUFFLIES 2105 5 S /2t/ E t F5. 56 KN CX LUPFr'R SUPPLIES 244,&23 tF4L2 S 12A 1 f4 35l 3 L4NG CICFARC tfiA.hE ALLCw4%C" 35 C 24N11 S1G. f4 85.57 PAC GUSEI EGUIZPe`il SLFFL1E'S 85!97 sue* ti Ar 9126/ E4 2b67. r^4 Pr_ IRO INS=$ SERVICE ElE'C T ASFECT ION e•- tip.. -• UTILITT': E r•S•P.L'ILITIE= f. * ape 1914 CI I OF MAFL V7ILITI =S F •..•• CFFCK 4C.rTrE AFCUrT f a4z Pa UTIL TI -E S.P . F73 C h •c.P0 UTIL ITI=E f•S•P•UTILITI =.-, 1•E.?• c8s4h5..r9/Lc7 / 8 50 e3 0S.F . Ze. 4r5C S/27/F4 47e3C n eSoP 2E4N5 C A•S.P• 13.1? h •P• iE4(5S 27/F4 114.65 A."S Pa UTILITIIc t.S.P• 2 25 .4 6 N.Sop a UTI L. TIES 9S 0 •LTILITIE= A.f•D• 2E4nE 9i27tF4 1OS7977 rsS•P• ie4NE::9/27JF4 55.60 1 4Ea ?0 2 ?4 P r S /t 11 F It 2 . 41: N • .ape 841 EL'S /271F4 3•'z3 N4 2o 4 f E 9 /24719 - 4 2.40 werope i 11 N.S•P• 53, S •P a it4 E4 44 S•©• i64fk 9 /27 /E4 1 41 .5L h • s.P. e.84nE :s/2 "1/f I f7. Q6 h •c•ro ZE4 .1 ; /2 ? 1 E4 6,1C3.S5 c 4t S /14q•62 2. E4hFC 9J2 7/F4 134.12 i 4 C91277t4 53.15 iE4 S/21 /F4 41.''C 2 G / Z7 / F4 1 22 e1 P iF4RE :LSl27 /E 129.59 cE41x CS /171 F4 SEe35 Z84tE'.9/271F4 1 99:4 4 2 4 ;S /2iJz4 4.25 iE4nEL 9/27 4 a3A. "F e 2r4l1F C5 /2 27 t5 Z84 E 9 / "r7 /P4 26.43 cF4RL S /L:IF s E,;:7 iE4 'Ar 9127JE4 87.Q2 264 X :S /27 /b 4 27.4?. iE4nF_5j7-i1F4 4.25 E4tG "=rS /27/F4 27.5'9 iE, 4tiEr 9/171F4 4.25 ZE4V 5 /2 IF 150.:7 iF4f C 9/271 E4 112 •S6 2e4 Z7/ €4 E3.74 ZE0, ;C L /E4 17.12 iE4tF;:S ZiJE 2r '77 284f9 5/27/E4 13.29 2b4h8 9/c7/84 2569 iE4t r 5 27/F 51.47 264 r,zJ 5 /2i /F4 143.35 i841.9/.27/E4 12.1 2t4;F L S/2 i/ E 4 5007 84P,CF L9/27/E4 7.'5 2 4,L9/27/E4 74.F4 9,P817.68 ; IPA*y CHECK REGIS + = VEKV! ITEM ^ LEE `Cf'FT:O h. RTHWEST. E7LL = T7% LEFHCN -:. A^ THWES ?;4h E =LL TEL:.Pv0hE NrjPTH6EET EFLL TELEFiONE F IrFn TwvilSST - :_Rh E =LL T':LEP-Gh S of: e UTILITT': E r•S•P.L'ILITIE= f. * ape UTILI&TT " f a op q V7ILITI =S F •..••UTiL TTIEr 0S•P•ItTILI TI Ec f a4z Pa UTIL TI -E S.P .ITIL + TI Sr. c h •c.P0 UTIL ITI=E f•S•P•UTILITI =.-, 1•E.?•UTIL_TIEE 1.•°.UTILITIES 0S.F .LTI Li TIF'T t.S.P.L.TI L ITIE n eSoP U I Li TZ A•S.P•LTILITI£- h •P•UTI L =TIE < A•S.?.LTILI TICS A."S Pa UTILITIIc t.S.P•LTILITT::S N.Sop a UTI L. TIES 9S 0 •LTILITIE= A.f•D•UTILITIES P.tiTl LITI--- C rsS•P•UTILITIE' h.;..UTi LIT I =S 1 4Ea ?0 UTI 11 LIT IL1TIES N • .ape UTILIT = S P, • P0 UTILITIES N4 UTILITIES. s op U71LITI werope UTILI3Irc N.S•P•UT1LITIEE S •P a UTILITIES ft. ape LTILi TIE : S•©•UTILITIES. hosop.LTIL'_TIES h • s.P.UTI L.1 T I c 10 S•P0 UTILITIt h •c•ro UTILITIES i 13 1Sf4 CITY OF MAr'L;:i,tCO CHECK t+C. 04 ;E CHECK RECTSTEA AMOI.KT VNCCM ZTEP CESCIr T'0N cF4NS5 9 /24IP4 9.25 9.25 LAVEAAE T tEL TFt:'iIlG C5 2 9/20 /169-0 CLSIQN FrAFL P 2t4P4 6 6 t FHCT; S TC G0 CFF.IC_' SL - ftLI S 2 4F41 9i26/f4 b7 67, Fr' * F CN = .n F M S L P F L IT S 2F4F45 C 26 /F4 074 .. * TN ;Y 9 `CONTRACT r Zr4F5C t S /2f /L4 P75."L Q75.'C+ FJ TMsS T `'FCS7AGL iffi 204F67 5/2C/P4 76.50 76.5,CF= SS7 C%AL FF CC =SS wA S JLLY 24F_9 2s4F,. 9 SJ2if t S /2/F 4 °3 Ft *SFY CCU53#z4.31 F.MSEY CCUNTY C "1T?4CT FYM 539245.14 *CC. NT cHCT FY'M y126/ F4 3i6. 1 3C6.Z 1 * F i frDUST T-'A`_"SUFFL.ES 2t4F49 5/2f Ifs Zj• 4.9 3_.4P + READ Rf -CUE SUPPL 2F4S.,2 9 /i6 / E t t 284 E ,,2 2.6r 4.2C 58 C L +CCK &S IF' f SUPrL -* 6 ' C r LACK &SAFE LPFLI ES i A • 4. J' nkc t. Y 1SF4 LIT1 OF MA;LE6CCC CHELK AC•CITE AMOUWT 2845 5 9 /i6IF4 Sq • ^r 2F45;S /2E /18828 2F4 S;: 5 9126 /F4 26912 CFF_ CE OFF: C.SI:PF l :^ 2F4S7_5 SJ2E /f4 S• 2845.:;y/26JF4 9.18 i4S 5 2E /E1 73.16 2645 '5.7 S /i6I1 43.65 ? 2F4S.:5 S /2f /f4 4f. 41 2 F4 1. `_9 12 6 / F 4 23.60 2F4`:.5 I S/26 / t 95.2$ 2x45:.5 SJ/2e 79.97 2F4S:: s 2tJF'32.b8 2845:.5 yl2cl8 t 16. 2f4 `. T 32.69 i845 5 S /2f /8 8.56 T CFF ICEsFF 661.25 i8453;,C9 /26 Fl 42.13 t45?F4 14. 2t4?C 12. 2 8 OFFICE SI, PL : - " E9.3S T OFF :CE FF ;CF_ 4 S37 y/26184 1 IFF:CE CFF :CE 16.14 S 8 OFF CE 2It 4 'C 3S 9/26/84 1L".64 1CC'.64 y284 _. _9/26/ F4 21 21 ''' 2 4563 ti/2 7/ E 4 IB. =E 2c4 5t5 Sl2iIf4 0 ^.'" 2'_r. ^C w : *s•• 26400 9/26JF4 462.72 284S7C 5/2f1F_1 4143# .?6 8$1 •r * 2 84SF2 74 77 CFltCK REGI S 8 T CFF.CE 2c C. FFICE.SLFFL: "" E B CFF:C_CFFTC_SLc : FL •= S 8 T CFF_ CE OFF: C.SI:PF l :^ c T ECFFC GFF?CE SLFFL:_`_ S 9 CFF: CE CFF IC S LFFL _ S 8 T OFFICE CFF 1C=SU PL' -` 5 8 s CFF :CE CFF:C.SLFrL:` -.f 8 T OffiCE CFF'C -SLR - FL :f S 9 T ECF _CE CFF _C=SLF ' S,T FF =CE FFIC SLFPL S $T CFF ICEsFF C=S FFL :_` S 8 T CFF'CE CFF' C7 SLFFL . S &0FFICr OFFICE SI, PL : - " 5 8 T OFF :CE FF ;CF_SL }FL S $T IFF:CE CFF :CE SLFFLI~ S 8 OFF CE C' FF TC SU rFL -- , S - '+pS ##6412 S4rFL rS EARS #841 SUPPLI 841 2 SUTFL IE'S S. 1r'tl CPN ACS' rl -fit SUFFL SNORT ELLI CT lM_ 0 R CCtiTR ACT PY' ST PAUL CITY Cl: V EJ F C 3 ST PAUL RAMS=Y M_0 i- }- yeICAL. ST PAUL CAMSEY NED Ft-YSICAL z STANOARC SPG ALIGN QEPAi° NA:IT 51AAC4FC SFG ALIGN FSPtIn M:T ST!T= OF MN C:T C'NT cYN W, j I C t 19F4 CITY JF MAFLE I C3D CHECK R EGO ISTER CHFC AC.C 7E API CUNT V:. ADC?ITEM CESCHO'7 0 2E4SFif S/26/-239?48.49 STATE IF Mn DOT CONTRACT FYY - 2e4SF2 S /26 /Ez E9484r.'.36 STATE OF MN D ^T CCATA0ACT FYw 2F4;c2 9/26/f4 3 {3.25 STA77 DF M' OC r"NTFLCT rlm I iF4cf4 S F4 5. ":STrFF7t*' !CCTT C N A tLL «c',;C 2e4St S /2E /F i 20L.STCF'r =A SCOTT L SL FL.:S 2 35.! t c84S C 37, 9 SUFERI PS CA FUEL t',L -. 1c4S4C 1126 E4 24 SLFFkAN_ 'CA FU_ L 17 1 L 2t4S9r 9126 E4 161 or'?SL=ER0lE;TCA FUEL CiL 28 4S 1 5 IS U F E P ,+ P : - A E 2F4;S,y1761 25.50 SLFERAMECTCg FUEL CT t4S9C 2A /E4 1230 ICA FL .L CIL i X8459;,Z S /2f /f 1 51.1 5 SL +F'ltc IAA Ft OIL 2r4S9 S /2b /F4 14.'Li-I'- FU %I co 4S9C E4 45,50 SuFr' Ito A FUEL IL 2t4S9 1f4 SS.r'"LFSRfiMzF,CA FLCL "IL ce4SS"912L /11, ^[c,t F LFL CIL 2 t4S9 S /2C/E4 7 F. 'SU"Em'P CA FUE L IL 1 c4SS^9/26 E4 t CS,'4 U =R y£G-C,A FUEL _Il 2c4S9 yi6 /4 1?. 7C SL"rRAML ;ICS FL =I I 264S9 9 /25JR4 34,rC SUrcF.Mc +rA FEEL CI 2e4Sr4 5/2' A 40,33 SL FF °A'NERTC4 F 3IL 19023.52 2r4T2 5/27/14 712,T.A.SCH 'wFSKV SONS SUPPLI == 2t4 261f4 4995Cs"2.T.t.S^_HlFSKY SCAS CCNITcr.CT Pym 5 9662, flC 2e4T6 S /2E /E4 f8.77 TCLL w_LC:rS SLPF S,LPPLTcS - 6e.77 f 1t4Tc,.S /29/F 1 58 0 TFLCK UTILITI S KF SUt'FL _S 1C41 9 21 E4 82.77 TRLCK UTILITIES P+Fr SLFFLirS 14^, 7 7 r 264193 p 43. ?5 TWIN LAITY FILTrR F +LTr CLEA *.En 43.75 2840 L 9/2f/8i 32.2.0 UTFORVS UNL.M:TED UNIFDMMS ' W, 198.4 CITY OF PtFLE`CGD CHECK FEG:ST -R CHECK NC.CA7E MOUN'VENOC ITEM DFtCFIFT:C 2t4L5L L912f / f4 103. ^0 -LN'FCR Uf1 TEC UPIFCOP'S 2e4L5L 9/2t /F 44.:5 UP,jFORVc uNLIMIT;C L°vIFCPMS 2E406 5 /2E /f i 66955 L%IFCrfl S JALIM:TEC UNIF ^_P NS 2E41Si.C9046/F4 126.15 L&7FC UNLINITEL -Lr;IFC fps 284L5 S/2f/ F L 44.9 5 LRIF °'MS JtLI' I TEC U ! IFCM S 2t4L5 9/26/F4 1990 ''Cl LhIF S UNLIMITEI UKIf Cop IV, , ZE4L5L CS /2E /F4 48. 2 LP!FCRPS UNLIP17EC 0IFCRMS 2Z4L5;9 /Zb1E 26.x_'5 Lti1FMS i.311lINiT.'.?UKIFC NS 2415C 9/26/F4 144.UtIF UNL1k1TE0 L1FC MS V40%m CS / F4 23.22 Lti7Fc?P, s U h Ll. P T UniF:GrS 7C2.'4 i 4LE6 9 /Z6, /E4 9E.6 Ll1;VEFSAL MECrCAL SI:PFL E ZE'4LF6 5127 /t 4 LV,v =_;ISAL MED 'AL T LPPL1E'S 2EW6 SJc7 /F4 ice '''LNIV'.'FEAL 1 E 0 CAL SL'FFL.ES 124.4C f.fl i 2E4621 L:9/26/E4 2F.' -4 UARtirPS TFUE VALU CLPFLIFS i 2F.' -4 2F42 25IE O -AF.NEP INC 4JFllf SIPFLiEc i 284k5 L,9 /i6 l8i 65."C yFeca. TRCSETH Inc cLFPLIF LE4k7 L S F4 44.5C WSFEF TCS 7f :AC SoLpF i' 2E4 65 5/2/F4 13.'0 VE ?rp- T +RCET#t iAC SUFFLTE5 c45i.5I2 /E<2C'.5C itEErR- TRCSETF ihC SLPPLIE: t 143.00 f *t *f 2 4 >3 C 9/26/E4 1?E.L9 XrFCX CLFLICAThG C5 2E4 5/26/E4 130.'5 X CLPLiCA C C- 2616.18 4 i84 i4 9 /. -Zb /F 915.18 2TGLER INC REPATF PA7(T WE Z84 24t2 Lii26 /E4 614.3* 0 2_EGLLM It REPAIR M4 'Wri VE 11529.48 2E42 f C9 126 / F4 13 *170 ZRLST WILLI AV REFUkD 13.00 36054e59 FUND 01 TCTAL GENERAL 34996 CV40 03 TCTAL HYCF t ITT CAA? CE c 15F4 CI'Y OF Mar-L =i60C CHECK F EEG 1S7ER CHECK 1r, CITE AMOUNT V"_NOC 'IM FTTECESCFZ_C FUNn 1C 701 _1ntTCR AV »IL"E:L 4 FUN ICIAL FtRlc C£VELCF t 1.44C.:G FUND 12 TCTrL _7R£CT Ctr:T c 2?.?4R. 49 U ^ 32 TOTAL _b? -1' R = CE C Y 6 4f'`.3 FLNC 4C TCT AL E4 -`. 4In Y 61 &C: t3.29 rUN 5F ICIAL E'' -10 HT 1 Fi N k 105.47 FUN ^ 6 TCT »L 81-12 t-^LL CW 53924C.31 rut r 71 TCTAL PI-21 y E A1+ /H 1 •75.P F 'tiiC 9C TCT tL S4hTT 4RI SE6 = 4 C 3 FUGT 94 TOTAL CENTAL SELF -INS 6,135.56 FUN^ 9f TOTAL V7HICLE 8 E(;LTF 1?41F11 ICTAL INDICATES ITEMS FINANCED BY RECREATIONAL FEES r 6 1 Y li CITY OF MAPLEWOOC PAYROLL- mCHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8018 CHECK OATS 09 -21.84 PERIOD ENOIHG 0914.84 PAGE 1 It1 2 13 E . _ .....CM L C1• N 4 Nfi --- - C'iA , 2 00^12 484369671 BE"" LOTS N 0917 4000001 459.00 t ) 3 002 20 frt*nl-I --- -tVANS.........._v .w_......___...._. SA ylwlt ?WOO 3fl a 0002 Is 83 6.68 • tERC11ER..` .1fl11tH _""``tr`.091 'tt13• 1,17 fs 0012 361.29: 1? , spa 0021 469501078 FAUST DANIEL F 091 7.00009 1 *035.47 t ) rty20021469743719METERNANCYE0917.00 010 0.00 t X I z 0021 1.035.47 v. 2s 0010 47 3664474 JAHN DAVID J 0917000 03 108.19 t ) •t 3 0010 473900147 JO.MNSO1M 46 SWANSOftwJlr GREGORY R 0917- 00004 0.00 LI,Y ............_........ f_ - _*" ._ 08 t X ) '' to t 34 002 1 a 0010 0917 +00013 342.99 t 576927 • 0012 357340166 CUCE LARRY J 0917m00006 175.961 t ) if 37 0012 470520124 t #7009@8- DOHERTY KATHL M 0917 81.74 t 1 f 1`. tERC11ER..` .1fl11tH _""``tr`.091 'tt13• 1,17 fs 0012 361.29: 1? , spa 0021 469501078 FAUST DANIEL F 091 7.00009 1 *035.47 t ) rty20021469743719METERNANCYE0917.00 010 0.00 t X I z 0021 1.035.47 v. 2s A" L. 1 N11 V V .71 ip 3 26 0022 390444446 NAT ALANA K 0917- 00012 543.52 t 34 002 476704432 MOELLER MARGARET A 0917 +00013 342.99 t i' 3 I'GRAt OE . twit -91 irw$00I # ''464 37 tZO 30 00.2 2 19 834.57 •30 44 31 32 0031 4 7132 2198 A UREL IUS LUCI LLE E 0917.00015 811 41 r34 00 31 4 74 2 6 481 6 SE LVO G 8E T TY 0 0 91 7. 016 6 r 33 0031 1943103 dam; 3 0033 3Sr 00.33 i 41 0033 0 J ,,f ; i 0034asp 003 4 SO 0041 0041 53 0041I.0041 0,a 0041 4 - 389 -- 0 It EEN -C---@917M G 06 f .. 5 $1-.'09 t 0 . n 4fi 4T2244994 fE NSLE V PATRICIA A 091 7 -w00018 256.90 t I 50 4 76620 547 KELSEY C ONN I E L 0917- 00019. 294.47 t 1 468364435 VIETOR L.ORRAT HE S 0917= 00021 431.23 hr 4740975215 ST OTT LE MY "Ea R EO "IT M 6 091 T -000 22 52.00 52.00 f 4 68'4 7'!-` `.' t.` tIt.3S-..`".............. .- t E1y1ETt......__..V.T7*f0$23 .57'. .- _...,..... 477369263 NARTINSON CAROL F 0917 350.62 475323183 NE LSON R08 E RT 0 0917-40025 6 36. 91 4 7 fit - 2763r -- - ---- Q.}A' tit '_._.......w....__..._...._._. ..t?1t - -•- .,. ._09t7Ut3426w . - .r.._.. _......w_.. - - . I, 4 71502356 RIME CAROLE L 091 7 -00027 41304 t 1 f ti •,468602934 SVENDSEN JOANNE M 0917 -00028 501.08 t ) 73 29 346.06 * 14 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PA YROLL•CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8018 CHECK DATE 09m 21`84 PERIOD ENDING 09.1 4m84 PAGE DEPT-wN0 _. EMPL• NO- ......_..... EMPLOYIDE NAME _ -._. .. CHIECKP NQ - _.. . AMOUNT ..- _.__... 4 3 e, 47` - , 4r7 ?4 136ti-- -.~.~ iR1VdlU.--. _ _..._- ._._.._t1111Ifl___..___ 314-i-6 S U042 4714021 ATCMIISON 40"N H 0917 - GCC30 737.57 0042 476721577 BA NIC K JOHN 1 091 7.00031 54600 t ) 00,4 -2 --- -.-.130 WMA N R IC*- 7 -00032 0042 468461930 CLAUSON DALE K 0917 -00033 778027 t ) 0042 4 7644 6119 DREGS R RICHARD C 091700 034 7 78 .64 0042 -- *m2 6.78 81e ---r-6 RE . lit W OR"A N -_... _..t 0 9 i ?v#06035 --666-09 t t OU42 469568516 irALW`EG KEVIN R 0917 -00036 587.90 0042 473604916 VERBER7 MICMAE L 1 091 7.00037 665.3812 , Oa *-2 --- --4.72-2 2 2 k 3 - ---- -It4 R T ttg- ...__- _ ___.. _ - O N A ti 7,wGO 03 8 4-3001-- 0042 471563591 LANG RICHARD J 091.?w00039 605926 ( ) 0042 476401388 LEE ROGER M 0917.00040 680.85 t fl91F-Q0 04t-- - - - 7 73 18 1i„ 0042 469442063 M RI CH ARD M 091?w 309.12b0042476340990MORELLIRAYMONDJ0917 -00043 596.39 6*2•- ------ 4 6ff 462884--- --PEL fiI Eft.__.._.._._._ - -____ _ MILL 1 ** ?gw000 44-- - .690.93 4 1 eu 0042 471564801 RYAN MICHAEL P 0917 -00045 654.63 I 1 0042 4 70 52045-T SK OL14 AN DONALD W 0917 -000 46 393.85 t ) li 0042 41/721204 STEFFEN SCOTT L 0917- 00048 335.75 0042 471509251 STILL VERNON T 0917.00049 725•309 ( ) 47 29284-- fiBCIfTQN.__...._. ...- .......flERR Ett 417w0005G-. --- --$6f . 50 -fi -- 0042 471602052 THOMALLA DAVID Q917t0051 525.526 0042 475363333 MILLI ovaNE J 0917 -00052 500.37 t )Ix' 042 4 P42 LIP A"A - -- JOSE P"-- _-. *,. 0042 15 9290.29 * 31 0043 475546434 BECKER RONALD D 091 Tw00054 360.31 j ,.0043 469441789 GRAF DAVID M 0917w00055 63.0.83 t 1---------469.6 204 6 6-- -tt£'FIZ ---- --s-T EP"E N---- ------ J ..$9t 0 56 -- 81 :f-7 1 . 4' 0043 392T60009 KARTS FLINT 0 0917440057 104.70 0043 473567791 MELANOER JcN A 3917.00058 49.60 t f 4! 41-$-- ;_.- -* EL SON— . ._..._._A R OL __-- .- ---- --N---- 09.17- 000 59-- 9 1-8 *-60 41 0043 411504316 RAZSKAZOFF DALE E 0917 -w00 060 724.97 0043 474486071 WORWERK ROBERT E 091700061 31506 t 1r`0 - tiN 8REl+t-IAPE.S_... --w - 091 r- 130062 0043 4937 44l 0045 471401878 EMBER TSON JAMES w ..... .. _. M 0917.00063 y 7 58.80 1 ! f 0045 472242227 SCHAD T ALFRED C 0917-40064 779.83 t 4''0045 19 538.6 3 s i. f4B 4th r 004`6 477627236 FL.AUGHfDR JAMME L 091 7-00066 483990 0046 3167 MADELL RAYMOND M 0917 -CO067 469.56 t 47 38 flfa30 ART I Ail N M 0 91 0 068x..,.........___....4 4 4; 26 t 53 0046 472 365919 NELSON KAREN A 0917-00069 499.99 t 0046 469600183 R ASINE JANET L 091 740070 4 64.93 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL•CM=CKS REGISTER CYCLE 8018 CH DATE 09 -21 -84 PERIOD ENDING 09 -14 -84 PAGE 3 y VC Plow ft0 - Tf4PL =140 PLO 'N A 14 t . -M.. .._... CftiCK --Nfl2 0046. 477700322 STAHNKE JULIE A X7917 =00071 4 24.61 t ) 3 0046 29866.78 a + 7 5 1 --4 Aw T'- 0 A R1` A _ o" ?am" Fi 7.2.._.._.......... _ .2 41 ii 90 -- e 0051 473566872 hA IDER KENNET" G 0917 -00073 60961 0051 504483174 W JUO A 0917-40374 358.47 t ) 0051 660.98 + 14 12 e 11 0832 itItt lA W - C -0" fv*00075 --67Z04 l Y 0052 471526254 FRE6ER8 RONALD L 0917 -00076 396.31 t ) in 0052 502544337 "ELEY RONALD J 0917 -00077 607.74 t ) 1 Y Q, 7i58124 • -K Lr 32:25 0052 4683634x3 KLAUSING HENRY F 0917 - 00079 471.60 t ) 1t ell 0052 47S601431 LUTZ DAV TD P 091 7- 00080 4 83.88 t ) 3 6652 SERA L _ _ V 091 T • 0 0081----- ---- -----4 50,64 2.- ._._- ._._.._- t _ -t 0052 476 904500 CS WALO ER IC K 0 0917.00082 0000 t x ) 0052 468166755 PRETTNER JOSEPH 8 0917- 00083 856.37 t ) 32 472-241-494 .'; 005.2 470346224 TEVLI N, JR HARRY J 0917 -00085 58.49 t ) VOID x. 0052 475589777 ZAPP4 JAMES M 0917- 00086 0000 t x 1 0052 . __.... ....... ...., .. __.__..... 5 061.0 S * 31 3_54 x_33 0053 3 1p 941, 7 8 • .Kr 1AA, r; ....' 3f# tO"Ittlw R @ 893~ - -- ~-4~3t#: 15s--- -- ...--t-.- .- ---.'4y r 00,54 430.52sf • 1 -.. .........._........ . - .. ___.. .__ _ r.._., t 1 s 41 0058 471562563 EREHE I M ROGER Y 091 7 -00094 560 *90 t ) 4 0058 477602582 EOSON DAVID 8 0917- 00095 610.11 t ) 95 7054- .5g ......._....._._._...... __. 9- m 96---- ._..._ _._ _..s:z 1 $.~~.-.M.ULrE.E" . E8 K 8 " it 17 U0 0 49 Q: i , 0058 471501014 NADEA U EDWARD A 0917 -00097 566.64 j 0058 468361720 MUTES JN LAVERNE S 091 7- 00098 468.05 t ) OWEK---..._.. ..._... ..__... ....._. .. 6LRAL0..__....._.. .__...O9t ?-- fl0094----• - - - --4b .__... . i i 0058 3 v276.72 !" 0059 476249760 MACDONALO J0*1N E 09174 503.93 0059 475501000 MULVANEY OENNIS M 0917 - 00101 691.93 t ) Wit 53 005 1, 195.86. + 54 i 731 a ,14 10"INwoffe it? 4. 0053 4472481010 EELIAS JJAME GG 0917- t3OC88 703.74 t ) 0053 116724.6109 GGEISSLER WWALTER MM 0917 -00089 606.34 t ) 9aesi 69a 3t t, ._....,... .ctA tE3 fl9t 7 #i0 - am a1 0 0053 4475441688 PPECK DDENNIS LL 091 7.00091 549.76 t 0053 4472662522 PPRIESE WWILLIAM 00917 -00092 506.14 t ) 0053 3 1p 941, 7 8 • .Kr 1AA, r; ....' 3f# tO"Ittlw R @ 893~ - -- ~-4~3t#: 15s--- -- ...--t-.- .- ---.'4y r 00,54 430.52sf • 1 -.. .........._........ . - .. ___.. .__ _ r.._., t 1 s 41 0058 471562563 EREHE I M ROGER Y 091 7 -00094 560 *90 t ) 4 0058 477602582 EOSON DAVID 8 0917- 00095 610.11 t ) 95 7054- .5g ......._....._._._...... __. 9- m 96---- ._..._ _._ _..s:z 1 $.~~.-.M.ULrE.E" . E8 K 8 " it 17 U0 0 49 Q: i , 0058 471501014 NADEA U EDWARD A 0917 -00097 566.64 j 0058 468361720 MUTES JN LAVERNE S 091 7- 00098 468.05 t ) OWEK---..._.. ..._... ..__... ....._. .. 6LRAL0..__....._.. .__...O9t ?-- fl0094----• - - - --4b .__... . i i 0058 3 v276.72 !" 0059 476249760 MACDONALO J0*1N E 09174 503.93 0059 475501000 MULVANEY OENNIS M 0917 - 00101 691.93 t ) Wit 53 005 1, 195.86. + 54 i 731 a ,14 0 CITY OF MAPLE WOOL PAYROLL REGISTER CYCLE 8018 CHECK DATE 09 -2184 PERIOD ENDING 09.14.84 PAGE OEQ1ilwNfl_... - - EMPL•NQ. - .... E MPLOY NAME _....................., _.._... CHECK NOCIA 3 KRUMMEL BARBARA a 0917 X00 103 157.06 t ) 4 0061 468341993 1 - *132.60 3 - O QE f A R Q _..... _... _. _ _.. 08 E R.r_______ -- -0.9 t 7= 001-fl4 --- r----- 17 Z*. -1 0061 46858 2618 STAPLES PAUL I NE 0917#000 105 5 89.52 t ) e 006 4-- ........._ . _..._, ..... -. ,........ - .__.._ -__. __._... -. __... _ . r ..__. w . -.... -. _ .. - ..........._.......... sa IZtii 0062 3 * 717 * 07 • q 0062 474 92 P762 8REN4ER JAY A 0917 -00106 0.00 t x 40 006-2 .._._- -- _ -i 7144 470940175 ANDERSON C41R IST INE M 0191 7.00126 0.00 t oil A 0062 474 608182 GERM4.1N DAVID A 0917 - 00108 509.75 t x j 0062 412303411 GUSIND'fi MELV IN J 091 7 -OO 109 873.68 t 03S 00 MA A G . , _._ _________lA T TNf:1rt - - - ---- ._fl9 T7 -001 - 1 --- 1.09 oi .wMA E 0. 00 14 x 0062 502544121 WELEY ROLAND a 0917 "00111 629.26 t10110062468584797HOPKINSTHOMASC0917.00112 0000 t x r.0 0 67- = - --4 6 974 4 5 93 -1t QSCH it1 r.. __w.... -A ME_S __. _. - _.._..t3 91 ?Q01 '! 3 `_.._. _ ...9f . __._ - ....._._.. . 0062 473969784 imUNTER TONY 0917 -00114 86.00 t I r 0062 47174 8313 LISHA PDT TVOMAS 0 0917.00115 O.CO t x u ..-_ . .............................606.2 . ' 44 3 53-3 NCI I 0917wOO 116 5 5 6.74 t 421 0062 473565506 PARUSKA MARK A 0917.00117 587.05 t 43 0062 444444444 NE AL TODD w 0917 , w00 118 0000 c x I 4 76 721 245 DOUGl YT ALINDA 62 4 740 ?81 2 SCifK -E -_ - -._ -...LB E R t f -- 0917 001 0:0 23 4+76900508 DRAKE 0062 47764-6662 S ANDO UI ST THOMAS J 091 7 -00 1 0000 t x xs 4 6 9 9 4 8 - R4 5-- r----f *L E 18`E It - .w........M..._.._ 0062 47590 4189 1O WNLEr MICHAEL F 0917.00121 O. CO t x 0063 472921037 FISCHER SUSAN 881 93.7 T0 W :P A T R- IC X --af- OQ 0,* 00 f X ---t 40 2e 47 3925557 FOWLER 006 2 4 7574 5266 WARD TROY G i0917.Oo123 0.Q0 t x Q 1171 C+fR IS, 0062 398164097 YUKER WALTER A 091700124 5308 t sa IZtii 0062 3 * 717 * 07 • M 6 4 -- -AM *A Re"f2s 0: 40 0063 470940175 ANDERSON C41R IST INE M 0191 7.00126 0.00 t x A 331 0063 4 7582 3190 8A RTH OLMY JODY M 9917m00127 0000 t x I . - 34 0-6 0 Sr- Ttl ....__. .- -.-.-.-it 8: 03S 0063 2 71 379 Y BLACK WILLIAM J 0917 -00129 0. 00 t x 36 0063 472362015 EORASH DONNA F0917 -00130 287010 t @6.3 ---- -----# J 46 2448 --- -O R YA fd T -R O B E R T- -- 0- 0 917 -w-0 3131..440-1-- 4 3dl 0063 474442414 EUNKE RICHARD H 0917.00132 0.00 t x I 0063 4769 4605 CASSED%T EL IZ ASETPi 4 091? 133 0000 x r 86.3 ..73 68 49 ?*-- . ___-SAS g'- fl-A-T--11AR1 -.. - --1t-- ~f}91- T-wDi?13 0063 469441338 EE MARS SANDRA L 0917 -00135 251.49 t 421 0063 474829219 OIEBEL JERRY 0 0917 -00136 0000 t X 43 4-?4901.92-2 - 01- #0E-R *AN..... -. 006 3 4 76 721 245 DOUGl YT ALINDA 0917. 01 8R03 0.00 t x 0063 4+76900508 DRAKE BARBARA J 091 7.00 139 0.00 t x 06 4 6 9 9 4 8 - R4 5-- r----f *L E 18`E It - .w........M..._.._JA M E S ._091 - 001 - . 4fl - _p x ... 0063 472921037 FISCHER SUSAN M 0917.00141 0000 t x Je 0063 47 3925557 FOWLER MARY K 091.7.00142 0.011 t x Q 0063 1 779 -88.735 6 AtBR-AlTh C+fR IS,01-43 0063 46998 3628 GRAF MICHAEL 091 7.00144 0000 t x i„0063 502825654 MAMM DEADRA M 0917 -00145 0000 t x 5 4963_ - -----4? 58 2 6? 1 Z---- -. _.. --- - _-- _A ME S .... ..._.0391 2-00 t46 .sift.- ............... 0153 0063 4 7484781 1 HE IMERL CAROL 0917 -G0147 0000 t x r 0063 476686 996 +MER8ER KART N J 0 91 7 -00148 0000 t x) M CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL- CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8018 CHECK DATE 09w21 -84 PERIOD ENDING 09-14-84 PAGE 5 DE PiTwff*' No 2 3 0063 473908785 H4LLI NGSW OR T" LISA 0917m00149 00co t x 40"NS ON 0 9tllwoo 0 c x i 0063 4 6980 6100 JOHNSON TERESA L 091?-40151 00011 x 0063 4698620,99 K ANE KAREN 0917-00152 0000 x 7 Rt . a .1 .if -E --------KA- f)il Off.Oe6l -680,5-48 KI XS-A 0063 476743753 KLASSEN SUSAN 0917-,00154 0000 t x I to 0063 474743915 KORTUS JAMES 14 091 7m,01-1 55 0000 t x I 0 3- i-ID"'740-00-156 c x i .13 0063 472494219 LE CLArR MARY L 0917op00157 0000 t x 14 12 0063 473269324 MAC DONALD ELAINE E 0917-40158 0000 t x Is 3 14 -691 fMae 1-59 0 x 17' 14 0063 4 73 700729 MA"RE MICHELE A 0917-w00160 0000 t x to 00613 470926903 PESSIN KATHLEEN 14 0917.00161 0000 x 10 3-- 4f4"6t5G ltrflftl CM I.- L 09tl'm(10162 -0,-00 c x i bill 0063 469583307 %ISKA JANET A 0917m00163 0000 t x 0063 474,745123 NOESEN CRISTI N A 0917 -001 0000 t x I 5 -4 -11 -51S 5 8 V OLSON— ----*OBER _ - X - 0063 .472809158 PADGET11 MARCIE D 0 91 7m00 166 0*00 t x 0063 469848105 PEARSON LESLIE A 09114000167 0600 t x I fY 3 .... ..... 4 f2 -9* 1.9a @ rittrit ft-- i CM AE IL-*-0 91-7.0 0 f -68 P ,23 0063 468827763 RADA MICHAEL F 0917 -00 169 0:00 t x 24 0063 396V4919 SINNIGER SARAN J 0917-00170 0. C0 f x f%O% " 3Mo23 4 -OAV it 2a 0063 469945370 SPANNRXUER EVA C 091 00co t x 0063 4.69742645 SPANNSAUER KATHLEEN 6 0917•00173 0.000 4 x 0063 4 ?"4.51 ? 6 Nfqfjiklttrk- -14A 174- 3/ 3f% pas 0063 469965435 SPANNSAUER SUSAN L 0917 -00175 0.003 t x 301 30 0063 477920170 STRAUS LAURA J 091 7,wOO 176 o.ca x 3110 31 0 91-lfwwl --- ------------ -6063- 4f686 106 -sulvillt"Am ut-1E.- x 10 41 0063 4 7182 39 21 SZUREK JOANN to 091 0000 t x 006.3 470626422 TAUBMAN DOU J 0917,40 179 594o48 4.3ae63 "96-3205''' W ALL A-Cr. i 180w - 25 "0 c 0063 396324246 WARD R 6 091 7-00181 2 78* 31 3.6 0063 474606610 ZAHN WILLIAM A 0917-00182 0*00 t x 0063 1 o664*38 140 0064 15 14*050- 8 RE W jA%r_ I M 0911•M-18.3 41 0064 471384624 NORSNELL JUOIT" A 0917-00184 258*57 0064 474542163 SOUTTER CHRISTINE 0917-000185 300,*01 0064 19079*78 1413 i •a 0 OT i '" 4-8991 C ft-EttCK 186 _1"ii C 0 0071 475502485 HISKELL NANCY 1 0917 -00187 0000 c x 1.rwrM ......'.T- .. . n. w•. n .r.- sr.w.ww- +.rw.....w«...n ..w..w w.. VFW .rw+MFM++..+r.w.r._wwr.- ...... I^p 0orl 473540551 OLSON GEOFFREY W 0917.00188 802,e86 go 0071 1,155.86 52 0 w$3 0072 475608505 JOHNSON RANDALL L 0917-40190 528097 75 llv. CITY OF MAPLEWOCO PAYROLL - CHECKS IEGISTER CYCLE 8018 CHECK DATE 09 - PERIOD ENDING 09 -14-84 PAGE 6 EM P !.• w4 ..._......._ . €.Ilfl. BYRE ..N A 1ME.. _......._- ... ,. _ . - ... CN E CK N S ..__.._ .... .._...,. 7.609t?6fit s- d 00.73 805.29 !° A 0 e 0074 387520776 WEAFGER ROBERT j 0917+00192 563.80 = 1 10 0052 470346224 TEVLIN HARRY J 0 179OOOOlA607.91 ( ) 17 COUNT 00.192 GRAND TOTAL Lq, p Q13 ...- ... .............,,._...__ ,....,...,,.,,.. ......._ .__..._.__ ..,.,_.....,- --.. ..___ _.. _.._...,_- .- .- ..- .._.._.__._._ _ .. _ _...__- _.---.•---•...- ...- ..- . --... __.._......._.._-VG 205 (70 --170001477058088A14DERSONNORMANG0917 -00193 128.61 t I So 0001 483621318 BASTIAN GARY W 0417`00194 279.90 I 1 e _ y.__ . - .. - - -#)St- .._...._ __..1 br8 2fl f -? 09-- --__$ RA1f tt- _ _ .__....,.._..__.. __ .__._.. _ _.....w .. _- - -- ; i 110001472369035MAIDAMARYLEET0917- 00196 279.95 001.1 47 ?056134 WASTL UK MICHAEL T 091.7 -00197 300.00 t VOID 1i 1 P 473%6134- -WASILU 000 r, zot 8 t r 13 63, 396.72 is 31. 37 2!i S K; 7Q eel 8t SH' 7(ti{ 1 73 74 73 7 MEMORANDUM Act, un ' 1 1 ..........,._ TO City Manager e c ;-. FROM: Public Works Coordinator Date SUBJECT: Budget Transfer DATE: 9 -27 -84 t Through the good offi of the East County Line Fire Department and its chief, a donation totaling $1,250.00 has been received from the Maplewood Moose Lodge, North St, Paul VFW and Champion Paper Company of St. Paul. The donation was made for the purpose of purchasing hydrant marker flags, and in the hope that the city would provide matching funds to expand the undertaking. If matching funds are pro 280 hydrant marker flags could be purchased and installed prior to the 1984 -85 snow season. Staff supports this concept and recommends that the hydrant charge maintenance materi account (03- 4180 -60) be increased by $2 To accomplish this, anticipated revenues should be increased by the amount of the donation, with the remaining $1,250.00 being transferred from the hydrant charge contingency account (03- 4910 -60). mb MEMORANDUM Re j ected_____.... Date TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer DATE: October 1,1984 SUBJECT: Change Order No. 3-- Holloway Avenue Improvement -- Project No. 81 -12 Herewith is Change Order No. 3 for the Hol l oway' Avenue Improvement Project. We are requesting council authorization and execution of the Change Order. - The changes involve water service corrections that were required but not located until the project's final inspection. j Attachment RESOLUTION DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the city council of Maplewood, Minnesota has here- tofore entered into a Joint Powers Agreement with Ramsey County and North St. Paul and has ordered made Improvement Project No. 81 -12 and has let a construction contract therefor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project No. 81 -12, Change Order No. 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order No. 3. 1 • i t L -H ENDRICKSON INC.SHORT- ELLIOTT CHANGE ORDER SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 LOCATION: MAPLEWOOD, MN DATE: - -- -- - LOC ON . I ORDER N0. OWNER:CITY of MAPLEwooDCHANGEO JOINT HOLLOWAY AVE. IM F N 81168PROJECTNO. - FILE 0.. Nature of Change Description and Cost: INSTALL CURB STOP ON EXISTING WATER SERVICE AND RESTORE SURFACE . . . . . . . . . . . . LUMP SUM $ 950 INSULATE EXISTING WATER SERVICE AND RESTORE SURFACE . . . . . . . LUMP SUM TOTAL $1 ,950 Is Cost Actual or Estimated? ACTUAL . This authorizes Contractor to perform this work as part of Base Contract when signed by all parties. Recommended for Approval: Shortllliott•Hendrickson, Inc. By Approved for Owner • G. Chri rsen CITY o MAPLEWOOD 0 Agreed to by Contractor: By CITY OF NORTH ST* PAUL 1 By Title By T. H* Schif sky Son , Inc. RAMSE COUNTY By Distribution Contractor 2 Owner 1 Resident Engineer 1 St. Paul Office 1 Short - Elliott - Hendrickson, Inc. 222 East Kittle Canada Road Saint Paul, Minnesota 55117 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1380 FROST AVENUE MAPI,L'WOOD, MINNESOTA 5 109 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY SERVICES 770 MEMO Action by Council: Endorso Marl I E TO: City Manager FROM: Paul i ne Staples RE: Transfer of Donation to July 4th Fund e - DATE: September 21, 1984 Donations that have been received for the July 4th Celebration at Wakefield Park. The money receive has been earmarked strictlytrctly for Fireworks. Ci tv Council action i"s re u i red -toq appropriate these funds to the above account. Metropolitan Inspection Service.45.85 North Maplewood Lions Club 100.00 Chicone's Bar & Cafe 30.00 Party Time Liquors 25.00 Circus 100000 Maplewood Moose Lodge 200.00 St. Paul Ski Club 50.00 Maplewood Bowl, Inc.35.40 Video King 35900 St. Paul Suburban Bus 30.00 Hardee' s Restaurant 26.50 Gladstone House 30.00 Warner' Hardware 60.00 Midas Muffler 23.75 791,50 E i F n MEMORANDUM r ,. / . Action by Counc TO: City Manager 4 FROM: Finance Di rector C Enders RE: Public Hearing and Resol uti ons - 1985 Budget -f° d _.._ DATE: October 2, 1984 R ected____. _ Date The public hearing notices on the 1985 Budget have been published in accordance with the Federal Revenue Sharing laws. A copy of the public hearing notice i's attached for informa- tional purposes (Exhibit A). After the publ hearing is held, two resolutions need to be adopted. The first resolution formally adopts the 1985 Budget and is attached as Exhibit B. The expenditure amounts listed i n the proposed resolution include the revisions made by the Council during their budget meeting. These revisions are itemized in Exhibit D and include a recommended $7,800 increase in the tax levy. The foll is a summary of the General Fund revisions: Original Current Proposed Exhibit D Proposed Budget Revisions Budget 1,946,614 1,946,614 Beginning Fund Balance 6 9 6 , 428 , 500 Revenues 230 230,000 Transfer in from Revenue Sharing Fund 6 7 6 , 257 , 420 Expenditures 1 17 1 Transfer out to Capital Improvement Fund 30,000 30,000 Transfer out to Special Assessment Fund 966 966 Ending Fund Balance The budget resolution expands the authority of the City Manager to implement budget changes. Previously it provided "that all budget changes shall require City Council approval except for budget transfers of up to $1,500 between accounts with the same department and fund which shall be implemented upon approval by the City Manager." The attached resolution allows the City Manager to approve all budget transfers within a exceptdepartmentt those that would increase the salary appropriation. This revisionpp would reduce the number of routine budget transfers that would be sent to the Council which would save time and money. A second resolution (Exhibit C) must be adopted that levies taxes payable in 1985 that will p rovide an amount sufficient enough to support the 1985 Budget, The second part of this resolution adj the tax levies previously certified for all existing bond _issues. It should be noted that these previously certified bond issue tax levies were initially established at the time bonds were sold and equal the estimated unassessed improvement project costs. The scheduled tax levies have to be adjusted annually to finance the debt service requirements based upon . the special assess y p assessments actually 1e -vied, investment interest earnings, and the to be transferred from the General Fund. Adoption of both resolutions is recommended. DFFInb a, EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING a PROPOSED 1985 BUDGET NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Maplewood City Council will hold a oublic hearing to consider nronosed uses of federal revenue sharing funds by the Citv of Maplewood during 1985 and the relationship of such funds to the City's entire 1985 Budget. The hearing will begin at 7:00 p.m. on October 8, 1984, and will be held at the East County Line #2 Fire Station, 2501 Londin Lane. All citizens will have the Moortuni ty to nrovide written and oral comments on the possible uses of revenue sharing funds and to ask questions concerning the entire budget and the relationship of revenue sharing funds to the entire budget. The following is a summary of the oronosed budget: General Government Finance City Clerk Public Safetv Public forks Community Services Cor. unity Development Proposed 1985 Budget 5,529,410 399,210 178,890 3,144,140 3,E07,40n 891,010 287,530 14,037 990 Proposed Revenue Sharing Portion 0- 0- 230,000 0_ 0- 230,000 The revenue sharing funds are aronosed to be transferred to the General Fund and used to partly finance the contracts between the City and its three fire departments: Gladstone, Parkside and East County Line. A detailed breakdown of the above will be available for nubl i c i nsoection during normal business hours at -the City Hall, 1380 Frost Avenue. ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST in this matter are invited to attend and be heard. Senior Citizens are encouraqed to attend and comment. Handicapped P 9ersonsneedin assistance or aids should contact the City Clerk before the meeting. Mrs. Lucille Aurelius Citv Clerk Publish: September 19, 1984 Maplewood Review) Post: In City Hall for public display EXHIBIT B. RESOLUTION ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR 1985 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the budget for 1985 is hereby adopted as outlined in the fol l owi nq summary:- BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following appropriations are hereby approved for the 1985 Operating Budget: General Fund: 572,290 220,340 178 890 3,151,070 1,057,320 789,980 287,530 6,257,420 Hydrant Charge Fund: 94,530 General Government Finance City Clerk Publ i c Safety Public Works Communi t.y Services Community Development General Fund Total Public Works Sewer Fund: 175,120 1,982, 860 V.E,M. Fund: 302,690 8,81:2,620 City Clerk Public Works Public Works Total Operating Budget Appropriations BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following appropriations are hereby approved for the 1985 Capital Improvements Budget: Capital Improvement Projects Fund: 2,000,000 Construction of new City Hall Park Development Fund: 83,400 Various park improvement projects as listed in the 1985 Budget document) Street Construction State Aid Fund: 120 Street overlay and sealcoating program Traffic signal ti com i nstal l ati onsnalando50,000 9 P T2 Total Capital Improvements Budget Appropriation Capital Debt Operating Improvements Service Budget Budget Budget Estimated Balances 1 -1 -85 4,204,986 2,299,319 5 Revenues 9 244 2 Net other increases (decreases)19235,550)1 155 Expenditures 8 2 2 Estimated Balances 12 -31 -85 3,475,016 1 5,614,162 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following appropriations are hereby approved for the 1985 Operating Budget: General Fund: 572,290 220,340 178 890 3,151,070 1,057,320 789,980 287,530 6,257,420 Hydrant Charge Fund: 94,530 General Government Finance City Clerk Publ i c Safety Public Works Communi t.y Services Community Development General Fund Total Public Works Sewer Fund: 175,120 1,982, 860 V.E,M. Fund: 302,690 8,81:2,620 City Clerk Public Works Public Works Total Operating Budget Appropriations BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following appropriations are hereby approved for the 1985 Capital Improvements Budget: Capital Improvement Projects Fund: 2,000,000 Construction of new City Hall Park Development Fund: 83,400 Various park improvement projects as listed in the 1985 Budget document) Street Construction State Aid Fund: 120 Street overlay and sealcoating program Traffic signal ti com i nstal l ati onsnalando50,000 9 P T2 Total Capital Improvements Budget Appropriation EXHIBIT B Page 2) 3 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following appropriations principal, interest and fiscal charges are hereby approved for the 1985 Debt Service Budget: 2209580 Debt Service Funds 297435040 Special Assessment Fund - Debt Service Accounts X2,963.;620 Total Debt Service Budget Appropriations BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that authorization is hereby given to transfer $230,000 of revenue sharing monies to the General Fund to partly finance the contracts between the City and its three fire departments: Gladstone, Parkside and East County Line. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the transfer of appropriations among the various accounts within a department budget or within a non - departmental expense category shall only require the approval of the City Manager, except that any transfer of appropriations, within a departmental budget so as to increase the salary appropriation shall require the approval of the City Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all appropriations which are not encumbered or expended`at the end of the.fiscal year shall lapse and shall become a part of the unen- cumbered fund balance which may be appropriated for the next fiscal year except appropria- ti ons for capital improvement projects which shall not 1. apse until the project is completed or cancelled by the City Council. EXHIBIT C. gE_S01LU110N__L-Ev TAX-ES PAYABLE I'N 1985 I BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that: 1. The following amounts of taxes be levied for 1985, payable in 1985, upon the taxable property in said City of Maplewood, for the following purposes: General Operations $3,834,800 Debt Service 731 Total Levy $4 2. There is on hand in the following sinking funds excess amounts as indicated after each fund and such shall be used to pay on the appropriate obligations of the City Description 1967 General Obligation Sanitary Sewer Bonds 1967 General Obligation Improvement Bonds 1968 Improvement Bonds 1969 General. Obligation Improvement Bonds 1972 General Obligation Improvement Bonds - Series 1 1972 General Obligation Improvement Bonds - Series 2 1973 Improvement Bonds 1977 Public Works Building Bonds 1977 General Obligation Improvement Bonds - Series 2 1979 General Obligation Improvement Bends 1980 Fire Station Bonds Total 3,400 11,100 11,000 6,100 8 2,500 107,200 20,700 121 9,700 3,700 305,100 In accordance with Minnesota Statutes 475.61 and 273.13, Subd. 19 3), (a), (b), (c) and Chapter 297a and Chapter 162 of Minnesota Statutes, the County Auditor of Ramsey County is hereby authorized and directed to reduce by the amounts above mentioned the tax that would be otherwise included in the rolls for the year 1984 and collectible in 1985. 3. It has been determined that the following bond issues have insufficient projected as sets to meet projected l i a b i l i t i e s , as required by State Statute, and the original resolution levying ad- valoren taxes must be increased in the following amount: Increase Descripti on In Levy 1970 General pObligationImprovement Bonds $ 29 1977 General Obligation Improvement Bonds - Series I 28,000 Total 579700 EXHIBIT C Page 2) 4. Changes set forth in sections one (1) and two (2) above result in a net reduction of X247,400 and are summarized and hereby adopted in the attached Schedule. Such amounts shown are the total amounts to be saread on the rolls in 1984 and collectible in 1985 for each of the bond issues shown, including the reductions and increases in levy amounts set forth in sections one (1) and two (2) above. 5. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to furnish a copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Ramsey County forthwith. EXHIBIT C Page 3) BONDS & INTEREST LEVIES COLLECTIBLE 1985 TAX LEVIES PLEDGED TO REDEEM G. 0. REFUNDING IMPROVEMENT BONDS 1974 TAX LEVIE LESPL TO REDEEM G. 0, REFUNDING IMPROVEMENT BONDS 1977 Code Per Bond Amount BOND ISSUES Amount Date No.Register Levied Consolidated Improvement g 975M 12/1/64 19 4-0- Municipal Bui l di nq 175M 5/1/65 05 400-0- General Obligation Imorovement 835M 12/1/65 19 17 17,400 General Obligation Improvement 750M 12/1/66 19 24 24,000 General Obligation Impr. Sanitary Sewer 645M 7/1/67 16 12 8 General Obligation Improvement 450M 12/1/67 17 12 900 General Obligation Improvement 380x1 12/1/68 18 11 General Obligation Improvement 1 12/1/69 23 45 38 General Obligation Improvement 605M 12/1/70 26 10 34 General Obligation Improvement 1 8/1/71 23 65 65,0100 State Aid Bonds 540M 8/1/71 06 O-0- General Obligation Improvement 1 5/1/72 20 30 21 General Obligation Improvement 670M 12/1/72 21 30 27 General Obligation Improvement 2 7/1/73 22 147 0- General Obligation Improvement 1 11/1/74 26 40,000 40 Generalnral bli ationObligation Improvement 1 12/1/75 26 75,000 75,000 General Obligation Improvement 1 5/1/76 26 132 132,0010 General Obligation Improvement- Series 1 3 4/1/77 24 27 55 Publc Worksrks Buildin Bondsog 995M 4/1/77 07 86 65 General Obligation Series 2 Improvement - 3 10/1/77 25 126 4 General Obligationation Bonds - 1979 825M 8/1/79 27 52 42 Fire Station Bonds 470M 8/1 /80 08 77,000 73, 390 978 731 TAX LEVIES PLEDGED TO REDEEM G. 0. REFUNDING IMPROVEMENT BONDS 1974 TAX LEVIE LES PL TO REDEEM G. 0, REFUNDING IMPROVEMENT BONDS 1977 EXHIBIT D REVISIONS TO THE PROPOSED 1985 BUDGET COUNCIL CHANGES Item No.Amount Account Code Description 1.4 01- 4640 -62 Increased the appropriation for dragging equipment for ball fields. 20 2 01 -3803 Increased the estimated revenues for an anticipated donation from M.A.A. for _preceding item. 30 21 01- 4010 -62 Deleted the proposed appropriation for one additional. thru park maintenance person. 01- 4050 -62 4.6 01- 4490 -19 Added an appropriation for the State - mandated comparable worth study. 50 12 01- 4020 -22 Deleted the proposed appropriation for a half -time thru accountant 01- 4050 -22 6.9 01- 4020 -22 Added an appropriation for a temporary accountant. and 01- 4050 -22 7.7 sO30 01- 4480 -44 Increased the appropriation for the contribution to the Firemen s Relief Association t Staff Recommended Changes 8.7 01 -3011 Increased the estimated revenues from property taxes. The form submitted by the volunteer firemen on October 1st indicated that the minimum City contribution to their pension fund for 1985 is $27,871. This is $7,871 more than.what was estimated when the tax levy limit was originally calculated. An increase in the tax levy by 7,800 w i l l produce $7,570 additional revenue after deducting a 2.9/ allowance for delinquent taxes. MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development Action by Couicy SUBJECT: Side Yard Setback Variance LOCATION: 1770 Edward Street Endorsed APPLICANT /OWNER: Albert and Marilyn Galbraith Modifi DATE: September 26, 1984 Rejected., Date SUMMARY Request A side yard setback variance of 18.5 feet. Proposed Construction The applicants would like to construct an addition to their house with a side yard setback of 11.5 feet. Code requires at least thirty feet. A variance of 18.5 feet or 62% of the code requirement is needed. Recommendation Approval of a side yard setback variance of 18.5 feet for 1770 Edward Street, based on the following findings: 10 There is an undue hardship on this lot because it is substandard in width (70 feet),, Code requires 100 feet of width. The required side yard setback of 30 feet unduely restricts the buildable width of the lot and the house is already built to the minimum setback on the north. side. 2. The spirit and intent of the ordinance is to keep a uniform setback from public streets and provide adequate sight distance at the corner. The intent of the ordinance is met because: a. Sophia Street is a short street without uniform setbacks. b. Council approved a variance in 1972 to allow the house across the street (1763 Edward Street) to be built with a side yard setback of 15 feet. c. While there are no records of variances, aerial photos show that the garage at 1756 Edward Street and the house at 1758 Pha.l en Place appear to be built at the right -of -way line. d. The existing.garage is already built 9.5 feet from the right- of-way line. e. The addition would not be seen by any other houses, except the house to the south, because of existing trees. f. The addition would not interfere with sight distance at the corner. BACKGROUND Site Description Lot size: 70 feet of width and 120 feet of depth for an area of 8400 square feet (both lot width and area or substandard) Existing use: single dwelling Surrounding, Land Uses 1. Single dwellings 2. Other corner lots in this neighborhood are also substandard. The lot to the south (1756 Edward) is substandard in width and area. The other two lots on this corner (1763 and 1758) are substandard in width. Past. Action 9-23-71: Council denied an application to vacate the alley behind this lot. 6- 22 -71: Council approved a ten foot front yard setback for the house to the north (1774 Edward Street) . 5-18-72: Council denied a side yard setback variance for the house across the street (1763 Edward Street) . The request was to have a side yard setback of 1.0.6 feet. Council based their denial on the following reasons: 1. The site has available land area to construct a home in accordance with minimum village standards without requiring a setback variance. 20 No homes in the entire area are or have been allowed to build that close to an intersection existing.' 3. To grant the variance would be giving a special privilege denied to all corner lots or any other lot. 4. The variance would allow a building too close to an already hazardous intersection and thereby further inhibit sight clearance and reduce traffic safety. 50 The minimum distance a driveway curb cut is allowed from the intersection of two streets is 20 feet according to Chapter 1500 of the Municipal Code,, Theref ore , the variance would cause driveway conflict for street Opening. 6. Although surrounding neighbors may have signed agreeing to the variance it does not relieve the public responsibility for safety, conformity to standards, or the preventing of special favors for convenience sake. 6- :1 -72: Council reconsidered and approved the variance at 1763 Edward Street after the variance was reduced from 20 to 15 feet. Approval was based on the petition signed by the surrounding property owners stating they did -not object to the placement of Mr. Franke' s home and that it appears to be in line with the closest property and as lon g as it does not protrude beyond the nearest neighbor's home to the east. Planning Land use plan designation: R1, residential low density Zoning: R -1, single dwelling residential Compliance with land use laws: a. State law: The following findings must be made before a variance can be granted: 1) Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under considera- tion. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not cons iti- tute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. 2) The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. b. City ordinance: Section 36 -71(1) states that "on a corner lot, the side yard on the street side of such corner lot shall have a width of not less than thirty feet." Citizen Comments Staff surveyed the 45 property owners within 350 feet of the site. Nineteen are in favor, nine had no comment, two objected and the rest did not reply. Those in favor gave the following reasons: 1. This is an old plat and there are many variances in this neighborhood, 2.. Sophia Street ends 150 feet to the east. 3. The addition would not interefere with traffic vision. 4. 11.5 feet is an adequate setback. K 5. The garage is already ,,only ten feet from the property line. 6. The addition would improve the appearance and increase the value of the home, The objections are as follows: 1. Too close to the street. 2. Obstructs the view. 3. Does not enhance the lot or street. 4. Would create a precedent for other variances and create a "hodge- podge" in the area. Procedure 1. Planning commission recommendation 2. City council holds a public hearing and makes a decision. jW Attachments 1. Location map 2. Property line /zoning map 3* Site plan 40 'Letter 5. Resolution 4 Cl Tr OF • Or M/ 4ti1- M 1 . - R j IF A M R R R C MIN v R ROAD 46R IF j ` ! • IF R - PUD FJRIFMl M IF F (R2)R 6j 0 I 061- A F= A-- F?! Ml RN4p RR " Cou F R3Ml R IF Ml Ml 0 Ml Ml &ANni IF 1 5LPW,CE R DR TRjNpr I ' "04 AFm CFMIAvrI 1, Rif Rr---- r _. , IF R 2P COuNTv -a RR 7 'R EL t. N C, L1 , rR fF t [waitc T Ix OWERE 2) F 21 QKE AVE R3 R IF RR 5E R U *d FJ C I aEL-MON'T r,-t MON -AW COLA R 4 ' ' Ll %4A%dia &MIFI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Af 1 ~ Q j or IF R RYAM f I R2 A R%,( avE It zIFF 6' YASJ R21 1. 7 R2 R LBC C, R AVE F8C r ---n 1. Sr PAUL N C; .0- cl ry OF ST PALL LOCATION MAP 5 UNNNOW Attachment 1 Sn b Ov q 2 2 2 1 IS 2 IS 14 (52 1 tGS 0 ) 5 12 (s, 5 12 t G = 44) Sl Go j ( 7 1 w a Rl P LEY AV E60 LOOKOUT 010 3 ' 20 s •' so ' J12 tt ' 10 L' 114) 15, IG) it lb 119 lO 2 37 fte' LN \ 1L O , - t - - - IS ti g 1 to 2rLi t 2 qt 3 ID (• 14(La N tars (GS) 1 Go 11 Go I: 2 3o D 110 COMI t I A At S U 0 4 I lei 4P_ 1758 5 7 (7j t trol kw As - 1 6 17 a i iQ • Im d . " p (bz is e4 b Is ' 17 o 14 in 2b a, fice, 000 8 {S 7) 5 oso 040 i 30 13(t7): 4o .32.rc.. .te . , c.) 04 .." 31 { i _ 4 m ) CO a 10 X50 10 rla.v Q t ) (2.1) a s,) i 2 do- Ci 0 045 Co 3a„. 17 14 4ISO 0 1'59 2 . '4% 06P.. •SSA. W. F 11 N R': M /r. 1 040 1 BZ go , Q - 2 - 1 1 t2 13 14 1 f ss.26410 5 10NNW r PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 6 Attachment 2 4 N bigw a a 7 N 2 ci r 0 a h 3 i Sophia Avenue SITE PLAN Proposed Addition 7 Attachment 3 go 9bz E •?d t IO 46. 2 .2; etc fO-S&V& 4r, s lG C + .i..' s7 s P /s•0 4t p eAte6, tvlss Osf'e ,! Sf 37.a2 4b &Rif /Ar 4c c I UL Id 114LPors.L ! - o es.c z/1.-{ -ts. To i Atip 7 - 4t. „r.4 W.T R.Ir, 4975 .r pa.... I . w...i = •M as Z/rMt S/ _ • •f+t Z.s a, rs, .1 v.«s... s .` ti c: 4 L ..is f L -7f ..,, - - o o,r K L.s /T. Grv..c A !"t lOd+IC .S li+1[. 4. jvC` Yef/ST -C I IL c. I 4p sj 7 av . O'i SO lf fJ a sc%'S'/•+rIC 1t tJ ass (Ics4yo `[G P.+.t 1 N •G s o..Leo M G P.rt dW j Attachment 4 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the East County Line Fire Station #2 in said city on the 8th day of October, 1984 at • 7 p.m. eThe following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Albert and Marilyn Galbraith applied for a variance for the following- described property: Lots 10 and 11 and the south 6 feet of lot 9 in Block 8, Lakeside Park This property is also known as 1770 Edward Street Maplewood WHEREAS, Section 36-71(l) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires a 30 foot side yard setback on the street side of a corner lot; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing an 11.5 foot setback, requiring a variance of 18.5 feet; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on September 7, 1984. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on October 1, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said variance be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on October 8, 1984 to consider this variance . Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council a 1 so considered reports and recommendations of the city sta f f and planning commission, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described variance be approved on the basis of the following. findings of fact: 1. There is an undue hardship on this lot because it is substandard in width (70 feet). Code requires 100 feet of width. The required side yard setback of 30 feet unduly restricts the buildable width of the lot and the house is already built to,the minimum setback on the north side. 20 The spirit and intent of the ordinance is to keep . a uniform - setback from public streets and provide adequate sight distance at the corner, The intent of the ordinance is met, because: 9 r• a. Sophia Street is a short street without uniform setbacks. b. Council approved a variance in 1972 to allow the house across the street (1763 Edward Street) to be built with a sideyard setback of 15 feet. c. While there are no records of variances, aerial photos show that the garage at 1756 Edward Street and the house at 1758 Phalen Place appear to be built at the right -of -way line. d. The existing garage is already built 9.5 feet from the right -of -way line. e. The addition would not be seen by any other houses, except the house to the south, because of existing trees. f. The addition would not interfere with sight distance at the corner. Adopted this 8th day of October, 1984. Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I. the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the 8th day of October, 1984, with the original on file in my office, and the same i s a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this variance. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 19840 City Clerk City of Maplewood 10 ter ••• • Action by Council • MEMORANDUM Endorsed.._. Modif i e3....._.._ Rejected..,,_._____ TO: City Manager Date FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson SUBJECT: Tax - Exempt Mortgage Revenue Bond Financing (Preliminary Approval) and Housing Bond Plan Amendment LOCATION: County Road D, East of Hazelwood APPLICANT Maple Ridge Partnership and Podawiltz Development Corporation a OWNER: Robert Hajicek PROJECT: Maple Ridge Apartment Project DATE: September 27, 1984 SUMMARY Request 1. Preliminary approval of a $3.8 million tax - exempt mortage revenue bond ro ram to construct a'100-unit multiple dwelling project.P g 2. Amend the city's housing bond plan to include this program. Proposal 10 The apartment complex would be designed principally for young professionals who will be employed at or near the St. John's Hospital medical campus. 2. The proposed rents would be: a. All 43 one - bedroom units $450 /month b. Twenty -seven of the two bedroom units: $525 /month c. Thirty of the two - bedroom (executive) units: $600 /month 3. Construction is estimated to begin in November and be completed next August. 49 The city's full faith and credit would not back these bonds. Comments The proposal: The proposed apartment development has been granted all required zoning and building design approvals. The enclosed report page 8 ) from Maxfield and Solomonsen, real estate market analysts, satisfies the documentation that. this development: 1. Will not have a negative effect on the vacancy rates of existing Maplewood apartment complexes and 20 Th -at there is reasonable assurance that 20 percent of the units will be occupied by low -to- moderate income persons until the bonds are retired. r • Hous i n g bond plan' amendment: - C o u n c i l ' s adoption of the housing bond plan in October 1982 authorized the use of tax - exempt financing for multiple dwellings. Th plan, however, did not include specific developmentment ro rams. As a result, each time a development is P programs. approved for this financing, council must amend the housing bond p lan. The amendment must be reviewed by the Metropolitan Council before the developer's request for the tax - exempt financing can be submitted to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for approval. Recommendation Adopt the enclosed resolution (page 16) , granting: 1. Preliminary approval of $3.8 million in tax - exempt mortgage revenue bond financing for the Maple Ridge apartments, proposed north of County Road D, east of Hazelwood Avenue, on the basis that: a. The development would be consistent with the comprehensive plan. b. A qualified marketing consultant has documented that: 1 The development will not have a negative impact on the. vacancy rates of existing multiple dwellings in the city. 2 There is reasonable assurance that the development will be able to comply with the 20 percent low --to- moderate income requirement over the life of the bond issues Final approval shall be subject to the following conditions : a. Payment of a lump sum or annual program participation fee, whichever would be more beneficial to the city, as follows 1 Lump sum fee: At bond closing, a lump -sum fee shall be paid in the amount of one percent of the bond issue, not to exceed $20,000, less the $2,000 application fee, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions. 2 1 Annual fee: An annual fee payable on each anniversary of the bond issue of not less than one - eighth of one percent of the unpaid balance and one- quarter of one percent of the bond issue shall be paid at bond closing, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions. b. The bond indenture agreement shall require: 1 The developer to annually certify on the anniversary date to the city, compliance with federal low -to- moderate income requirement 2) The program trustee, as approved by the city council, Shall inform the city of any noncompliance trends, regarding the low -to- moderate income occupancy requirement. 2. Amending the housing bond plan to include a $3.8 million dollar tax exempt financing program for the Maple Ridge apartment projectsect. 2 BACKGROUND Site Description i, Size: 5.06 acres 2. Existing land use: undeveloped Surrounding Lana Uses North: 1 -694 East and west: single dwellings located on large parcels planned for RH, residential higher density. South* Count y Road D. Across the street is undeveloped land, planned for DC, diversified center use. Past Action 7 -10 -84 The HRA recommended approval of tax - exempt financing for the development. 8 -14 -84 The community design review board conditionally approved the site, building and landscape plans for the development. 9- 24 -84: Council approved a conditional use permit to allow the Maple Ridge apartment structure to exceed 35 feet in height from grade. Housing i. The Maxfield and Solomonson report states that the city "will need a maximum of 95 to . 100 rental units per year through 1990 to house its own growth." 2, on August 27, 1984, council adopted the following requirements ax -exem e revenue financing for multipletmortgageforapprovaloftpg9 dwellings: a. The development shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan. b. The development will not have a negative impact on the vacancy rates of existing multiple dwellings in the city. c. There is reasonable assurance that the development will be able to comply with the 20 percent low -to- moderate incomeP requirement over the life of the bond issue d. The bond indenture agreement.shall require: 3 1 The developer to annually certify to the city, on the anniversar y date of the bonds, compliance with the federal low -to- moderate income requirement. 2 ) The program trustee, as approved by the city council, shall inform the city of any noncompl trends 4b 3. Federal law regarding the issuance of tax- exempt mortgage revenue bonds for multiple-family housing requires at least 20 percent of the e occupiedunitstob b low -to- moderate income persons until the bonds p Y are retired* Once a person or family is income - qualified, their unit counts toward the 20 percent as. long as they reside in the unit even though their income may rise above the ceiling. Low -to- moderate income is defined as an annual adjusted houshold income of 80 percent or less of the average a nnual income in the twin city rea. In 1984, the 80 percent ceiling was $25,280. (Gross y adult and 500incomeisreduced. by $750 per per child to calculate $ P adjusted annual income.) In 1984, the Metropolitan Council's suggest ed rent ceiling for low -to- moderate income households was $515 per month excluding 'the cost of utilities. ' 5. Accordin g to Apartment Guide figures, the average monthly rent for an apartment unit in Maplewood is $380. Finance The city Yma use the program participation fee for any purpose. Procedure 10 HRA recommendation 2. city council decision, following a public hearing Submission of the housing bond plan amendment to Metropolitan3 ' ro olitan Housin Guide.Council to review for consistency with the Met p g 4KrSubmission of the Maple Ridge apartment bond program to the MHFA approval jc Attachments: 1. Location map 2. Property line /zoning map 3 Site plan 4. Maxfield and Solomonson Report 5. Resolution n VADNAIS HEIGHTS a Z ': uj M kk AVE. ake KOH 4 r Cr w 0 0 W z 49 S GERVAIS AVE. my, I SHE yI 1A jol 11 AVE.- RA KOHLIWAN AVE. 23 IE DOE HILL. RD. J 65 0 AV 11th AVE. PvA! AVf 86STLE 40 LOCATION MAP 5 attachment one PM v . r 1 IfA i ao 00'' -- . CiO _ _. o`•t' TS1.sS Lil.L7e,tsp'ap' f ja0 - lao 1 Lpi , V Is In =IF zziumisfulm '' a z IM a In ik- Jr, C J , o se s R 3 R3 F to f rte ; rrs rr' : so 90101 t-E -- C O.0 N T Y # f ROAD M '' 0" [ tin PLANNED FOR DIVERSIFIED - f COMMERCIAL 110 . ...+. •i= .........{ _ • !. n Ui ea t5°10 , rte _ i . 111_ . . i . w. • . _ .•_ . i . -. -.. . ... i • . . •• . ..- -• • .-. f . T LA J r. • — or /+. f M t •3 L f1s till •1. i f • ..rte! _... , l • ` - t r ". _ . ,T r ••.s • r 1 No I r W_ 'w•m wa.rr L .... op 4N po 6 i J ."r' ~. _ +..rte.. r `....•u_ - f + ` fir....... ."'' • • 010 op low a MA ST. JOHN'S HOSPITAL COMPLEX PROPERTY LINE ZONING MAP _ 4 6 attachment two 094 al• lost sW , TE 19 r Blurnenta a100 s11IR"WA 01+#0 No to erooklm COAN wwww"Wol 65.30 eu•sn -ft" ow . IrIltltl.on 1,,stA1oAIlo i TEAAACE .. _.... 10 fit • for GAOL ASPHXT Cam CAOIK940 AREA PA aaArs a - ss com b ••-- r•. Vrw/. '.'l.is'fL 1Li r . r .. r .r .r• ..r• . •w r • . • . • i s • • - N AAAA' IIEIOw . . r •.- .r• -••• wry-- ••nr•••w.• -- • i t)t 1 • .,., Courm POAO 0 a C+ C+ no 0 F] m C + C+ m m N' a1T! PLAN 1 Is .jmoom . 43 .114 0M FACM* 80 KCAL! p ! e WINI - s .1! p ! M! toot ioo Joe i N1FAWAII PAWN0 • ! ANf IWOUN" 4 w0 CAN 11K1VEp.Km ACA • 104 GA/tAQ • 100 ' tostAl"' i !04 CAIN N11:1 ACRES $DO AM$ rA:P 1111 NCIIEASES • WIE11ty101M1 PAINING 300111. Wf LAwSCAPNO 1001f. / tw 106 /.R: f (oars 40,000 tv.• AS A , = rt AI pEII 1.16 ACRE! toot gI. 34 0 K04VAC11R 203.32 POSONS ALLO'W20 10 1040 COVI PAGE • 39 so 1/. _ .9 IA It MAIM au covc-nACA a 41.690 Sf. 11j"A A I.$% Ml If AI1.A • 120.441.I f. 2.11A so.$% 1 KCIIEAIKO" AREA • 1309 op, ,211A 1.f• I MAPLE RM APARTMENTS pArAl0I1 COf Date tkown Il.rwen. 1 arte pui viuk c M September 25, 1984 Mr. Michael Podawi It z Podawiltz Development Corporation 501 Mall Germain Suite 318 P.O. Box 1361 St. C loud , Minnes 56302 Dear Mr. Podawi 1 t z : Attached is a Summary of Findings on the proposed Maple Ridge rental development. Our analysis has considered the two issues related to the bonding criteria: the impact of these apartments on vacancies overall in Maplewood and the number of low to moderate income residents in Maplewood available for this development. We expect your units will be well accepted. We do not anticipate that the proposed development will have a negative impact on the market either short term or long term. Also, there appear to be no problems concerning the availability of low . to moderate income households to satisfy the assigned criteria. Based on market interviews and data, your proposed product should meet with excellent market acceptance. Resident managers mentioned that they have many prospective residents asking for two bedroom, two bath units. of special interest, are two bedroom, two bath units with equal sized bedrooms. Your proposed designs should be well accepted. We have enjoyed preparing this analysis for you. If you have any questions concerning this summary or the data which has been assembled for the final report, please call us at your convenience. We would also be glad to forward any of the backup data you need prior to the delivery of - our report in the next ten days, Sincerely, MAXFIELD & SOLOMONSON, INC. c$ =y M. soiomonson mkh Attachment Maxfield & Solomonson, Inc, /620 Kickernick Building 930 First Avenue North/Minneapolis MN 55401/Phone (612) 338 -0012 dttachmen four 12 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Proposed Development We have reviewed the proposed development plan, the site and location, and proposed rent schedules for the Maple Ridge Apartments. Conceptually the proposed mix of 43 one bedroom units and 57 two bedroom units is well balanced in light of market demand issues identified by the managers of the 16 comparable properties. The 30 two bedroom units which offer "double master bedrooms" will offer a much desired and needed product in the competitive market area. Presently, there are no two. bedroom, two bath units which offer equal sized bedrooms for roommate households. There are also very few two bedroom, two bath units in the competitive market area. TABLE PROPOSED UNIT MIX Gross Number Unit Type Square Footage Description First Floor 1 2 Bedroom,2 Bath -1 Manager Unit 8 1 Bedroom,1 Bath 803 Standard Unit 2 1 Bedroom,1 Bath 842 Corner Unit 2 1 Bedroom,1 Bath 803 Handicap Unit 7 2 Bedroom,2 Bath 1 Standard Unit 7 2 Bedroom,2 Bath 1 Double Master Bedroom Unit 3 2 Bedroom,2 Bath 1 Corner Double Master Bedroom Unit 32 Second Floor 12 1 Bedroom..1 Bath 80.3 Corner Standard Unit 2 1 Bedroom,1 Bath 842 Corner Unit 9 2 Bedroom,2 Bath 1 Standard Unit 7 2 Bedroom,2 Bath 1,041 Double Master Bedroom Unit 3 2 Bedroom,2 Bath 1 Corner Double Master Bedroom Unit 1 2 Bedroom,2 Bath 1, 215 Corner Unit 34 Third Floor 13 1 Bedroom,1 Bath 803 Standard Unit 2 1 Bedroom,l Bath 842 Corner Standard Unit 8 2 Bedroom,2 Bath 1 Standard Unit 7 2 Bedroom,2 Bath 1 Double Master Bedroom Unit 3 2 Bedroom,2 Bath 1, 041 Corner Double Master Bedroom Unit 1 2 Bedroom,2 Bath 1 Corner Unit 34 9 A The proposed unit square footages are all competitively sized. The one bedroom units at Maple Ridge are slightly larger than the norm and the two bedroom units are equal to the norm. other building features which will help Maple Ridge establish its competitive P os it ion will be the underground parking, community room, private balconies, Outdoor swimming pool and terrace and tennis court. Two passenger elevators are P lanned. The finishing package appears to be appropriate and will be competitive with existing area product. The site and location should be very acceptable for rental residential housing. The ro osed landscaping plan which has been prepared by Blumentals should P P create an environment which would appeal to the market. The location is excellent relative to minor and major transportation routes and the new job base gdeveloPin in Maplewood. The. St. John's medical complex will provide many prospective residents as will other developing area businesses* Also, the location's P roximity to the Roseville, Little Canada, Shorview, Vadnais Heights and White Bear market gives it added strength in attracting households from these communites , as well as Maplewood* Another excellent locat ional feature is the site's close proximity to Maplewood Mall and strip centers near the mall. As identified in the area overview ou prepared, the area has over 1,200,000 square feet of retail y P P space. Area Demographics We prepared a demographic analysis of a study area which includes: 1. Maplewood 2. Little Canada 3. Roseville 4. Shoreview (Part of City) 5. Vadnais Heights 6. Gem Lake 7. White Bear Lake 8. North St. Pau 1 9. Oakdale The total population in 1970 in the study area was 117,157 compared to 133,060 in 1980 a 13.6 percent increase during that ten year period. The projected count for 1990 is 146,461 persons, ten percent growth. Mapl ewood' s population was 25,223 in 1970. and 26,990 in 1980. This was a seven percent increase. The projection for 1990 .of 29,400 would be an 8.9 percent increase over 1980. This is an excellent growth pattern when compared to an overall metropolitan projection of 8.5 percent. The household count for the study area was 30,743 in 1970 and 45,561 in 1980 for a 48.2 P ercent change. The 1990 projections are set at 55,335 households which represents a 21.5 percent increase or 9,774 households. This would 10 r . 00 f A indicate that an annual base of 977 new homes will be needed in the study area through 1990. The 1970 household count in Maplewood was 6,487 compared to 8,806 in 1980. This represented a 35.7 percent growth or 2,319 households. The projected growth to 10 households for Maplewood represents an addition of 1 households up 19 percent. The study area employment growth looks very positive for the balance of the decade. Maplewood had 12,003 jobs in 1970 and 20,000 in 1980 for a 66 percent increase. This was five percent ahead of the study area for the same P eriod. Study area employment increased from 43,212 in 1970 to 69,590 in 1980, up 61 percent. Meanwhile, the metropolitan increase was only 26 percent. The projected employment growth for Maplewood is 40 percent with an increase to 28 by 1990.* This will mean an increase of 80 jobs per year, our final report will provide several demographic tables. Our analysis of this data is based on the assumption that a healthy rental market is in part characterized by a 97 occupancy level. With a higher than 97 percent occupancy rate, choice is limited and rents are not as competitive. Based on the analysis of population, household, and employment growth, we believe the city of Maplewood will need a minimum of 95 to 100 rental units per year through 1990 to house its own growth. In addition to this rowth the studg y area will need an additional 479 units per year through 1990. Maplewood could easily absorb 200 of these units per year. Based on the lack of proposed developments in the study area, Maplewood will be in a position to capture a significant portion of the rental market from other communit in the study area as well. Finally, our analysis of the study area income data, indicates that the development should not encounter any problems in fulfilling its 20 percent obligation for low and moderate income households. This data will be profiled in tables in the final report. Rent Comparables our rental analysis included a survey of 16 area apartment developments with key comparables from each community in the study area. Comparison tables have been set up and will be included in the final report. We surveyed a total of 1,444 one bedroom units and 1,570 two bedroom units* Rental rates, unit counts, dates and amounts of recent rental adjustments, rental policies, deposits, unit mixes , parking and garage .rents , unit square footages , and vacancies were analyzed for each development, The comparables selected in the study area were: Maplewoods 2 391 Lar pen t eur Grand Pre East 215 Viking Drive East Gate 6048 51st North Woodmere 6940 Woodmere 11 Burns Place Edgerton Highlands 1950 Burns 4751 Skillman Edgerton Manor Bradley House 2021 Edgerton 2150 Wilson Avenue Northwood Villa Tamarack East County Road D 6850 Ashwood Road Green Gate Battlecreek 1829 Furness 215 McKnight Road Hazelwood Heights Hillsborough 1512 County Road B 2345 Woodbridge Maple Manor McKnight Village 1770 Adolphus 177 McKnight Road Vacancv Analvs is There were a total of 11 one bedroom units and 16 two bedroom units vacant. Considering our sample base of 1,444 one bedroom units and 1,570 two bedroom units, the vacancy rate is less than one percent for one bedroom units and is one percent for two bedroom units. We believe a healthy rental market needs a vacancy rate of three percent to accommodate turnovers, consumer choice, and competitive rents. Therefore, based on the demographic analysis summarized earlier , we need to add a base of two percent to the existing one percent vacancy rate for both Maplewood and the study area. This would require an additional 56 to 60 units per year for Maplewood and an additional 479 units per year in the study area. Based on current demographics and proposed rental housing developments in the study area, the proposed project, Maple Ridge, should not have a negative impact in the Maplewood market. Another concern addressed by area resident managers was the additional need for both one bedroom units and two bedroom, two bath units with equal sized bedrooms for roommate households. The Maple Ridge unit mix addresses this concern. In consideration of the number of singles living at the development, the community spaces and recreational areas have been appropriately designed. Rent & Absorption Projections Your firm's rental projections are as follows: Number Unit Tie 43 1 Bedroom, 1 Bath 27 2 Bedroom, 2 Bath 30 2 Bedroom, 2 Bath 100 Units Total Rent Rent Without Garage With Garage 415 $450 490 $525 565 $6.00 12 1 , Based on our analysis and the assumption that construction would begin in January of 1985 with an initial occupancy date of September 1, 1985, we have concluded that the rent potential is slightly higher. Based on the net square footages presented to us by your firm, we have projected the following rates. 13 Excluding garage. Source: Maxfield & Solomonson, Inc. 14 1 TABLE COMPARATIVE MARKET CORRELATION ANALYSIS 2 BR/ 2 BA 1 BRA BA 1 BR /1 BA 2 BR /2 BA 2 BR /2 BA Dbl Master Standard Corner Standard Dbl Master Corner Square Feet 768 800 1 1 1 Assigned Base Rent 54 54 49 SO 50 Corner Premium 02 02 Second Bath Premium 02 02 02 Equal Bedroom Premium 02 02 Recreation Amenity Premium New Construction Premium 02 02 902 902 02 Location /Neighborhood Total 56 58 53 56 58 1984 (4th Quarter)*430 464 532 562 582 1985 (3rd Quarter)* 6% annual x .75 = 4.5%450 485 556 587 640 Excluding garage. Source: Maxfield & Solomonson, Inc. 14 1 0 1 15 Based on these rental rates,an aggressive and professional marketing program I hould achieve the following absorption schedule. 1.Initial marketing program June , July, August)30 units 2.September 12 units 39 October 12 units 4.November 8 units 5.December 6 units 6.January 6 units 7.February 6 units 8.March 8 units 9.April 12 units Total 100 units 1 0 1 15 RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A FINANCING PROGRAM FOR A MULTI -- FAMILY RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT AND THE PROGRAM, AND THE AMENDMENT OF THE HOUSING REVENUE BOND PROGRAMS PORTION OF THE CITY'S 4620 HOUSING PLAN TO INCLUDE THE PROGRAM PURSUANT 70 MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER. 462C, AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD TIO ISSUE -HOUSING REVENUE BONDS AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF THE FINANCING PROGRAM FOR THE P ROJE Cr FOR APPROVAL TO THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE SAID PROJECT AND PROGRAM MAPLE RIDGE PARTNERSHIP PROJECT WHEREAS, a) Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C the "Act) confers upon cities the power to issue revenue bonds to finance a program for the purposes of planning, administering, making or purchas ing loans with respect to one or more multi- family housing developments within the boundaries - of the city; b) The City has received from Maple Ridge Partnership; a Minnesota limited partnership (the "Developer" L a proposal that the City undertake a program to finance a Project 'hereinafter described; through the issuance of revenue bonds or obligations (in one or more series or which may be in the form of a single debt instrument) (the Bonds") pursuant to the Act; c) The City desires to: facilitate the development of rental housing within the community; encourage the development of affordable housing opportunities for residents of the City; encourage the develcapment of housing facilities designed 16 attachment five for occupancy by persons of low or moderate income v and encourage the development of blighted or underutilized land and structures within the boundaries of the City; and the Project will assist the City in achieving these objectives; d) The City desires to expand the Housing Revenue Bond programs" portion of its 462C Housing Plan to incorporate the program for the Project; e) The Developer is currently engaged in the business of real estate development. The Project to be financed by the Bonds is the construction and equipping of an approximately 118,575 square foot multi---family rental housing development of 100 rental units, consisting of 43 one- bedroam units and 57 two - bedroom units, located North of County Road D. South of 694 and East of Hazelwood Street in the City, and consists of the construction of buildings on such land which will result in the provision of additional rental housing opportunities to persons within the community; f ) The City has been advised by the Developer that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital costs of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the Project would be significantly reduced, but the Developer has also advised the City that With the aid of municipal financing, and resulting low borrowing costs; the Project is economically more feasible; g) A public hearing on the Project, the financing program and the amendment of the "Housing Revenue Bond Programs" portion of the City's 462C Housing Plan therefor was V 17 .. held at 7:20 p.m. on October S. 1984, after notice was published, all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C905, subd. S. at which public hearing all those appearing at said hearing who desired to speak were heard; h) No pub l i c ' of f i c i a l of the C ity has either a direct or indirect financial _ T interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly benefit financially from the Projects NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows Le The City hereby gives' preliminary approval to the proposal of the Developer that the City undertake the Project, described above, and the program of financing therefor, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, consisting of the construction and equipping of multi -- family rental housing facilities within the City pursuant to the Developer's specifications and to a revenue agreement between ,the City and the Developer on such terms and conditions with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary, so as to produce. income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the princip and interest on the Bonds in a total principal amount of approx imately $3,800,000 to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the Construction and equipping of the Project; and said agreement may also provide for the entire interest of the Developer therein to be mortgaged to the purchaser or purchasers of the Bonds, or a trustee for the bolder of the Bonds; and the City hereby undertakes preliminarily to issue its bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions; 29 The "Housing Revenue Bond Programs" portion of the City's 4620 Housing Plan as herein proposed to be amended is hereby approved and adopted and the City Clerk is authorized and directed to submit the amended 4620 Housing Plan to the Metropolitan Council for its review and comment* The comments of the Metropolitan Council, if any, shall be submitted to the City Council for its consideration; 3. At the option of the Developer, the financing may be structured so as to take advantage of whatever means are available and are permitted by law to enhance the security for, or marketability of, the Bonds; provided that any such financing structure must be approved by the City; 3 so 4. on the basis of information available to the City, it appears, and the City hereby finds, that the Projectconstitutesamultifamilyhousingdevelopmentwithinthe meaning of subdivision 5 of Section 462C.02 of the Act; that the Project will be primarily occupied; in part, by persons of _ low or moderate income; that the availability of the financing under the Act and the willingness of the City to provide Such financing will be a substantial inducement to the Developer to., undertake the Project, and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the provision of additional = multi- fancily rental housing opportunities to residents of the City, to assist in the prevention of the emergence of blighted _- and marginal land and to promote more intensive development and - use of land within the City; 5. The Project, and the program to finance the Project by the issuance of revenue bonds, is hereby given preliminary approval by the City subject to the'approval of the financing program by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (the MHFA ") and subject to final approval the City' y. the Developer and the purchasers of the Bonds as to ultimate details of the financing of the Project; 60* In accordance with subdivision 5 of Section 462C.05, Minnesota Statutes, the YMayoroftheCityishereby authorized and directed to submit the program for financing the Project to the MHFA, requesting its approval, and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide the MHFA with preliminary information as it --may .require; 7. The Developer has agreed and it is hereby ideterminedthatanyandallcostsincurredbytheCity n connection with the financing of the Project whether or not the Project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by MKFA will be paid by the Developer; 8. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, and Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. , are authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Project and the financing program therefor, to consult with the City Attorney, the City's fiscal. consultant, Developer and urchasers of the BondsP lor trustee for the purchasers of the Bonds) as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms ' and provisions of the Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary documents and submit such documents to the City for final approval; - 4 1.9 R 0 9. Nothing in this Resolution or the documents prepared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for. this purpose. The . Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or funds of the City except the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall the City be subject to any liability - thereon. The holder or holders of the Bonds shall never have: ' the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the outstanding principal on the Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereon against any property of the City. The Bonds shall recite in substance that the Bonds,* including the interest thereon, are payable solely - f rorn the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof* The Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation; 100 • In anticipation of the approval by the A and the issuance of the. Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Project, and in order that completion of the project will not be unduly delayed when approved, the Developer is hereby authorized to make such expenditures and advances toward payment of that portion of the costs of the Project to be financed from the proceeds of the Bonds, as the Developer considers necessary, including the use of interim, short -term f inaneing, .subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Bonds if any when delivered but otherwise without, liability on the part of the City. Adopted by the City .Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota this 8th day of October, 1984. 5 20 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original. thereof on file in my off ice; and that the same is a full, true and _ complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to a resolution giving preliminary approval to a multi - family rental housing development project. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this r day of October, 1984. City Clerk S - 21 0 .MEMORANDUM TOO City'Manager FROM:, Associate Planner -- Johnson SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit- -Home Occupation LOCATION: 2646 Maryland Avenue APPLICANT /OWNER: Katherine Shonka Actionn by CouDATE: August 28, 1984 Endorsed SUMMARY Modif zed..._.. Rejected..._. Request Date Approval of a conditional use permit to operate a beauty salon as a home occupation. Proposal 10 The applicant would be the only employee. 2. The customers would be taken one at a time, by appointment only. The hours would be Monday through Friday, generally between 8 a.m, and 5 p.m. An occasional Saturday appointment is anticipated. 3 One customer car, possibly two, would be on the premises at one time. The driveway is adequate to accommodate at least four cars. 4. There would be no outside advertising. 5. A walkout exit from the basement will be constructed Comments The proposal is compatible with city code requirements. Recommendation Approval of the enclosed resolution (page 6) , approving a conditional use permit to operate a beauty shop as a home occupation for one ear followinY gthedateofcouncilapprovalat2646MarylandAvenuesubjectto: 1. An exit from the basement in addition to the existing stairway shall be completed and approved by the city building official before customers may be permitted in the shop area. The basement stairway shall also be brought into compliance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC 2. An operative 10-pound dry chemical, all - purpose fire extinguisher must be wall - mounted and readily available in the beauty shop and a smoke detector is to be installed near the stairway. 3. Renewal may be granted if all of the home occupation code re q uirements have.,been. complied with and no nuisance situations persist. 4. A license shall be obtained from the city clerk in January, 1985 and every year thereafter for which the conditional use permit is in effect. k BACKGROUND Site Description 1. Size: 100 x 200 feet 20 Existing land use: a one -story style single dwelling with about 728 square feet of foundation area. 3 . Loca t i on of the home occupation: the shop would be located i n the basement with an area of about 130 square feet. Surrounding Land Uses North: Maryland Avenue across the street are single s Ea dwellingsg East and west: single dwellings South: single dwelling Past Actions Conditional use (prior to 1983 — special expection) permits most recently approved by council for beauty or barber shop home occupations were: 1-17-80: A beauty shop for Marjorie Zabel, 2648 East 5th street, subject to.a limitation of two customer chairs. 4 -3 -80: A barber shop for Daniel Spadino, 2620 Keller Parkway, 1- 10 -83: A beauty shop for Kathleen Apman, 1904 Maryknoll Planning 1. Land use plan designation: RL, residential lower density 2. Zoning: R -1, single dwelling residential 3. Section 36 -66 of the city code requires ten conditions for operation of a home occupation. Refer to the attached resolution (page 6) . 4e Section 36-442 of the city code requires ten findings for approval of a PP conditional use permit. Refer to the enclosed resolution (page 6) . Cites Clerk Section . 17 -22 of city code requires that "a license shall be secured from the city clerk, annually in the month of January, to continue op eration of a home occupation, once original approval is granted" (by conditional use permit).. 2 Building official /Fire Marshal The proposed walkout access is required. This improvement requires a building permit., The stairway must also be brought up to code. Citizen Comments Eleven of the neighboring property owners within 1,50 feet of this property were surveyed. Of the six respondents, five were in favor and one was opposed. The person opposed, believes that there would be insufficient off - street parking which would result in traffic congestion on Maryland Avenue. Procedure 1. Planning commission recommendation 2. City council decision following a public hearing mb Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property line /zoning map 3. Resolution 13 NO L LOW AY AVE. 212 s 41 PLEY AVE. 0 0 V V c s 30 AR,P NTE V Z 0 IOANO AVE. W Z cn Sol 3:cc MONTANA AVE. cw RE Cr p R is M A RYLAKE R D. i a L• W Il IVY Q W Q Trailer Court 68 (Priv 212 MARYLAND A ERGS" CN" ST 69 c-ERAN, 6I M BlOYGf l ! Q MA WOL A AVE a LoArs 3 a W ,t J H N W Cp \ CASE V° fig . : o o . - Z HA R VEST ER AVE, r 3 ,, h >2 o b AVE :.. W '•'• 212 W EL LA,BRAND AVE.32 T. TTM AV E, Z E. T Tb AVE T29M t R u f M LOCATION MAP a Attachment One 20Z 19 - 21 R2 0240 23 n W25 26 28 27 29 Oyu, "a S 32 \3 T 1n 33 34 3 2 ; Ins. 3 4 • • , S U I 3 0 n !36 V 35 44a s p 2 3 ;23 8IJ1% 14 , : 9 to P 2 72. 26B54' 7s ao 2;64.1 6 2657 P sc A zR-Y R, 9 CMS ` - f-, • - - :• 2636 2654 . 2664TLorA s 7Ar - - PUD R3 G 3 Ste fill f , 13 1 •-• r 43 7 3 -- .6 : is b45 5 .. - a 3 o, '2627 •- T s A f _ • t, N ofs ro v i t PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Attachment Two 4 N Pursuant tclueo call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the city council. of the City ' of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of , 198 at 7 p.m. . The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Katherine Shonka initiated a conditional use permit to operate a beauty shop as a home occupation at the following - described property: Lot 3, Block 6, Midvale Acres This property is also known as 2646 E. Maryland Avenue, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by Katherine Shonka, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on September 17, 1984. The planning Commission recommended to the city council that said permit be 30 The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on , 1984 Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. WHEREAS, Section '36 -66 of the city code requires home occupations to conform to the following requirements: lo Not more than one person, other than members of the family residing on the premises, shall be allowed to engage in such occupation. 2. An area equivalent to no more than twenty ( 20) percent of each level of the dwelling unit floor area shall be used in the conduct of a home occupation. 3. There shall be no change in the outside appearance of the buildin g or premises, that would indicate the conduct of a home occupation, other than one sign meeting the requirements of the city sign code 4. Limited retail sales of products produced off -site may be permitted, but only when subordinate to the principal activity of the home occupation. 6. No traffic shall be generated by a home occupation in greater volumes than would normally be expected in a residential neighborhood. The need for off - street parking shall not exceed more than three off - street parking spaces for home occupations at any given time, in addition to the parking spaces required by the resident occupants. 6 60 No equipment or process shall be used in such home occupation which creates noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odors or electrical interference detectable to the normal senses off the lot. In the case of electrical interference, no equipment or process shall be used which creates visual or audible interference in any radio or television receivers off the premises, or caused fluctuations in line voltage off the premises, 7. No fire safety or health hazard shall exist. 8. A home occupation shall not include the repair of internal combustion engines, body shops, machine shops, welding, ammunition manufacturing or other objectionable uses as determined by the city. Machine shops are defined as places where raw metal is fabricated, using machines that operate on more than one hundred twenty (120) volts of current. 9. Any violation of these requirements shall result in the denial or revocation of the home occupation. 10.0 Approval shall be for a period not to exceed one year. Renewal shall be subject to,the provisions of Chapter 17, Article II, of the city licensing code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings -of -fact: 10 The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services*; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 90 The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 100 The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 7 Approval is grant for one year from the date of council approval subject to the following conditions: , 10 An exit from the basement in addition to the existing stairway shall be completed and approved by the city building official before customers may be permitted in the shop area. The basement stairway shall also be brought into compliance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC) . 2. An operative 10 -pound dry chemical, all - purpose fire extinguisher must be wall mounted and readily available in the beauty shop and a smoke detector is to be installed near the stairway. 3. Renewal may be granted if all of the home occupation code requirements have been complied with and no nuisance s i tua t i ons - persist . 4.. A license shall be obtained from the city clerk in January, 1985 and every year thereafter for which the conditional use permit is in effect. Adopted this day of , 19849 Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMS EY ) S S . CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1984 , with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permit. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1984. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 8 a Use Permit--Home Occupation: on: 2646 Maryand C _A. Conditional p y Secretary Olson said the proposal is a home occupation request to operate a beauty salon. Staff is recommending approval of the request. The applicant indicated she had nothing to add to the staff report. They do have sufficient room on their driveway to provide the off-street parking. Commissioner Whitcomb moved the planning commission re_ commen_ d_ the city council adopt the following resoluti '+ WHEREAS, Katherin Shonka. initiated a conditional use permit to operate a beauty shop as a home occupation at the following- described property: Lot 3, dock 6, Midvale Acres This property is also known as 2646 E. Maryland Avenue, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by Katherine Shonka, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood planning Comms i si on on September 17, 1984. The plann commission recommended to the city council that said permit be approved. WHEREAS, Section 36 - of the city code requires home occupations to conform to the following requirements: 1. Not more than one person, other than members of the fami residing on the premises, shall be allowed to engage in such occupation. 2. An area equivalent to no more than twenty (20) percent of each bevel of the dwelling unit floor area shall be used in the conduct of a home occupation. 3. There shall be no change in the outside appearance of the building or premises, that would indicate the conduct of a home occupation, other than one sign meeting the requirements of the city sign code. 4. Limited retail sales of products produced off -site may be permitted, but only when subordinate to the principal activity of the home occupation. 5. No traffic shall be generated by a_ home occ in greater volumes than would normally be expected in a residential neighborhood. The need for off street parking shall not exceed - more than three off - street parking spaces for home occupations at any given time, in add*i ti on to the parking spaces required by the resident occupants 6 9 -17 -84 t 6. No equipment or process shall be used in such home occupation which i creates noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odors or electrical interference detectable to the normal senses off the lot, In the case of electrical inter. f ere6ce in any radio or television receivers off the premises, or cause fluctuations in line voltage off the premises. 7. No fire safety or health hazard shall exist, 8. A home occupation shall not include the repair of internal combustion engines, body shops, machine shops, welding, ammunition manufacturing or other objectionable uses as determined by the city. Machine shops are defined as places where raw metal is fabricated, using machines that operate on more than one hundred twenty (120) volts of current. 9. Any violation of these rqui rements shall result in the denial or revocation of the home occupation. 10. Approval shall be for a period not to exceed one year, Renewal shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 17,' Article II, of the city l i c e n s i n g code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the above- described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following f i ndi ngs -of -fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare., 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that Zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 6. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets . and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that w i l l cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, pol i ce, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 9. The use would preserve and incorporated the site's, natural and scenic features into the development design, j 7 9 -17 -84 17 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is granted for one year from the date of council approval subject to the following conditions: 1. An exit from the basement in addition to the existing stairway shall be completed and approved by the city building official before customers may be permitted in the shop area. The basement stairway shall also be brought into compliance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC) 2. p p yoperativeAno10—pound dry chemical, all—purpose fire extinguisher must be wall mounted and readily available in the beauty shop and a smoke detector is to be installed near the stairway. 3. Renewal may be granted if all of the home occupation code reuqirements have been complied with and no nuisance situations persist. 4. A license shall be obtained from the city clerk in January 1985 and every year thereafter for which the conditional use permi is in effect. Commissioner Sigmundi k seconded Ayes- - Commissioners Barrett, El l of son, Fischer, Larson, P 1 i sh, Si gmundi k, Whitcomb B. Time Extensi Ti 1 sen's l lth Addition Secretary qOlsonsaidthisisar for a time extension for Ti l sen' s Maplewood Heights #11 level pment and preliminary plat. Staff is recommending approval of a six —month time extension. Commissioner Pei l i sh moved the pl ann i.n commission recommen.d_ the ci ty__counci: 1 approve a six—month t extension - for Robert Ti 1 sen s 1-iopl e I11 f unit development and prel imi narx_pl at, Commissioner Larson seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Barrett, El l of son, Larson, Pel 1 i sh, Si gmundi k, Whitcomb TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT /OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: I Action by Council: MEMORANDUM Endorsed.,... Modifie Rejecte City Manager Date Associate Planner, Johnson Planned Unit Development Revision /Plat and Street Vacations Geranium Avenue and Evar Street Castle Design and Development Company Sterling Glen September 10, 1984 i SUMMARY Request 1. Revise the conditional use permit for the Maple Greens planned unit development to substitute 64 rental apartment units ( eight buildings) for 52 quad units (13 buildings) 2. Vacate the plat and streets. Proposal 10 See the applicant's site plan on page 8. The applicant has agreed to make the following revisions to comply with minimum .code requirements: a. Increase the parking stall depth from 18 to 20 feet. b. Increase the separation between the open parking stalls and the dwelling units to at least 15 feet. 2. The applicant will initiate the court proceedings required to vacate the . Sterling Glen plat on this site (block one and lots one. through 36 of block two) , once the revised site plan is approved. 3. The change from town house to apartment- style units and the vacation of the previously platted public right -of -way will result in a density lower than originally approved for the site as part of the Maple Greens planned unit development. 4. The units will be rentals. 5. The applicant is in the process of applying for council approval of tax - exempt mortgage revenue financing for this development: 6. The dwelling exteriors will be constructed with low maintenance materials. k , Comments Poor soils make the construction of the public streets for the previously approved site plan cost -- prohibitive, as explained in the applicant's letter on page 10. The proposed site plan eliminates the need for public streets. with the revisions stated in item one above, the new site plan is consistent with the zoning code and the density originally authorized for this site with the Maple Greens planned unit development, Recommendation Approve the enclosed resolutions (pages 11 and 14) vacating the plat and streets and amending the conditional use permit for the Maple Greens planned unit development to substitute eight eight -plex apartment structures for the 13 four -plex town house (quad) structures originally approved south of Geranium Avenue along Evar Street and Jessamine Avenue (presently platted as block one and lots one through 36, block two, Sterling Glen Addition) , subject to: 1. The applicant vacating the underlying platted lots. 2. Construction beginning within one year of council approval, unless council authorizes a time extension. 30 Adherence to the site plan dated September 11, .1984,, with the following revisions: a. Increase the parking stalls to 20 feet of depth. b, Increase the separation between the open parking stalls and the dwelling units to at least 15 feet. 4. Approval of the site,*building and landscape plans by the community design review board. 1 BACKGROUND e Site Description Size: approximately 6.1 acres Existing land user undeveloped Easements: Evar Street and Jessamine Avenue would be vacated along with all of the platted lots that made up this site. Surrounding Land uses North: Geranium Avenue. Across,the street are quads, double dwellings and two single dwellings. East: a double dwelling and two single dwellings all fronting away from this property. South: an unimproved 33 -foot wide portion of Magnolia Avenue right - of -way. (Consideration should be given to vacating part or all of this right -of -way. ) West: a single dwelling on a large lot and quads. Past Action 7- 26. -73: Council approved a conditional use permit for the Maple Greens planned unit development (PUD) as shown on page 7. Fifty -two quad units (13 buildings) were approved for the subject site. 7- 20 -78: Council approved a preliminary plat for the Maple Greens 3rd Addition. It contained the subject site as approved for development in 1973, 12- 13 -82: Council approved the Sterling Glen Addition final plat. It encom- passed about two - thirds of the Maple Greens 3rd Addition preliminary plat and all of the subject site. This final plat did not alter the preliminary plat configuration approved in 1973 for this site. Planning 1. Land use plan designation: S, school (southwesterly portion of the site) and RL, residential lower density. 2. Permitted density: the density for this portion of the Maple Greens planned unit development was approved at 33 people /net acre. 3.. Proposed density. 26 people /net acre f 4. Zoning: planned unit development 3 5e Compl i anee th land use laws a. Section 36-438-(c) states "the development (planned unit development) shall conform to the plan as filed with the city. Any substantive variations from the plan shall require recommend- ation by the planning commission and approval by the city council after a public hearing." b. Section 36-442-(b) requires ten findings for approval of a conditional use permit. Refer to findings one through ten in the resolution on page 11, c. Section 36-442-(d) states "the proposed construction must be substantially started or the proposed use utilized within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and. void. The council may grant one six- month extension of the permit if just cause is shown. This requirement shall not apply to PUDs with an approved phasing plan." d. Section 36 -109 (2) states "Minimum parking stall size shall be ten (10) feet by , twenty (20) feet, except that parking stalls for owner- occupied units may be reduced to nine (9) by eighteen 18) feet." e. Section 36 -109 (3) states "An open parking stall shall be a minimum distance of fifteen, (15) feet from a dwelling unit and five (5) feet from any abutting property line, side or rear." 6. Design review: The final site building and landscaping plans must be approved by the community design review board before a building permit may be issued. Public Works 1. There is no public need to improve the half width right -of -way that borders the south property line of this site. It would also not be cost — effective to improve due to the lack of benefiting properties and the steep grades. 2. A water tower is proposed to the south on the school property or the smaller lot to the northeast of the funeral home ( page 6) . A water main easement will be needed within the right -of -way along the south boundary of this site for this water tower. Procedure 1. Planning commission recommendation. 2. City council decision following a public hearing. Attachments 1 Location map 2. Property line 30 Maple Greens PUD 40 Site plan 5. Proposed building elevation 6. Applicant's letter of request 70 Conditional use permit resolution 8. Vacation resolution 4 AA 1 R c , A , R s, , ,' F i M' R2) t D, M M J J-e - M RRti . AKE 40 A f R R3 r2 a1% - BC R tt" BC R v R . LR j , A E NL < Z t r. E R ., - . - R F a E J r r R R t ; F r i R rs R ; ` • F F BC R i tt R Y-AR - AEL7 &I i MI ! ` R M i B . • r r.t f i BC M2 M2 C2 4 N r • A L,• • ' rhr{rlal MN lb o 16 dp dor RTM Nt. t Ow- iI ot 11n f . site •; K , ; ` 1 4 or t t i "'•' :..{nom - M1• ' i L 1- Q t a Tin , ft . r{ to 'pr ' • ' y E ,• ,' 4'' ga 4 0 Ito of U 1 R 1 MAPLE GREENS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TABULATION NORTH APARTMENT SITE: 170 UNITS TOWNHOUSE SITE: 44 UNITS SOUTH APARTMENT SITE: 110 UNITS QUAD HOME SITE: 128 UNITS DOUBLE HOMES - 16 U N ITS SINGLE FAMILY HOMES: 22 UNITS TOTAL: 490 UNITS AU. rj t i• •r VV •' I i QUA ' l U 0 am It v I f JOHN 1•! <rrt+ 1 VA . f51 . . 1 •• ,. ;, ,, " SUBJECT SITE 13 quad structures or 52 -dwell i:ng units 1 1 MAPLE GREENS MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 7 attachment three I l 00000V lk I l 00000V LAN (.September 11, 1984), 8 attachment four Ad ---40.1.ftV *MV OPVO LAN (.September 11, 1984), 8 attachment four A 11 i A I • o.Design & De Co. Inc. 2419 No. Maroare: St. North St. Paul. MN 55109 Phone 770 -6138 August 10, 1984 Maplewood City Planner City of Maplewood . 1380 Frost Maplewood, Mn. 55109 Dea Sir, Castle Design & Development Co., Inca is proposing to redo Sterling Glen Addition. When we.obtained the property the present plat had been approved as, a preliminary plat. We started construction and proceeded to complete a short .section of Geranium Ave. We found that the soil condition and water table were such that the cost tripled to what the street should have cost, the City Engineer concers with this fact. The portion of Sterling Glen-which we are proposing to repl at has Evar St. loop which we feel would even be worse to try to construct. Second, the 4 unit type home has lost its appeal to the market and we feel we must change the type of construction: We will, as you see, be -going to the rental .market as there has not been any new rental unit built in Maplewood in quite some time. Sincerely nneth D. Gervais Vice- resi dent KING: g rs 1 10 attachment six `' Pursuant to due call .sand. notice thereof a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said-city on the day of 1984 at 7 'p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Castle Design and Development initiated a a revision to the conditional use . permit for the Maple Greens planned unit development at the following- described property: Block one and lots one through 36, block two, Sterling Glen Addition, Section 25, Township 29, Range 22 WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 10 This conditional use permit was initiated by Castle Design and Development, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on September 17, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 1984. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described conditional use permit revision be approved on the basis of the following findings -of -fact: 10 The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 40 The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 11 attachment seven I 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 80 The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 910 The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design.. 1010 The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 110 The revision is consistent with the original planned unit development. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 10 The applicant vacating,the underlying platted lots. 2. Construction beginning within one year of council approval, unless council authorizes a time extension. 3. Adherence to the site plan dated September 11, 1984, with the following revisions a. Increase the parking stalls to 20 feet of depth. b. Increase the separation between the open parking stalls and the dwelling units to at least 15 feet. 4. Approval of the site, building and landscape plans by the community design review board. Adopted this day of Seconded by STATE.OF MINNESOTA 1 COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) Ss . CITY OF MA PL EWOOD 198 Ayes --- A , I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of 1984, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permit revision Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal 'of the city this day of , 1984 City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 13 a Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of 1984 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Castle Design initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following - described real property: Block one and lots one through 36, block two, Sterling Glen Addition, Section 25, Township 29, Range 22, including Evar Street and Jessamine Avenue WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is. as follows: 110 This vacation was initiated by Castle Design, 2. A majority of the owners of property abutting said streets have signed a petition for this vacation. 3. This vacation was reviewed by the planning commission on September 17, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that this vacation be 4. The city council held a public hearing on , 1984 to consider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood City Council that it is in the public interest to grant the above - described vacation. Adopted this day of Seconded by STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) Ayes-- 1984. 14 attachment eight I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I haveyye carLfully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of 1984, with the original on file in my office and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to vacation of a plat and streets. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the cityYthisdayof , 1984. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 15. C. PUD Revis Maple Greens Secretary Olson said the request is to revise the conditional use permit for the Ma P le Greens planned unit development to substitute 64 rental apartment units (eight buildings) for 52 quad units (13 b u i l d i n g s ) and to vacate the plat and streets, Staff is recommending approval of the request. Ken Gervai s, Castle Design and Development Co, said the preliminary plat which became Sterling Glen from Maple Greens,were in place when they purchased the property. Since that time, they have found that the quad buildings do not have a S ood market as it is over built and also it is difficult to stabilize streets in the area. What they propose is clustering eight unit buildings. r wil be three handicapMr. Gerva i s indicated Gated the e P units on the base floor 1 evel . The exterior of the b u i l d i n g s will be maintenance free. The garages will be hardboard siding. Commissioner Whitcomb moved the Dl anni n commi ss on recommend adopt the folio win resolutions vacating the plat and streets and amending the g cond P ermit for the Maple Greens planned unit development to substitute t use eight e i g t — h lex apartment structures for 13 four -.plex town house (quad) structures p p originally PPa roved south of Geranium Avenue along Evar Street and Jessamine Avenue resentl platted as block one and lots one through 36, block two,CP y P Sterling Glen Addition: WHEREAS Castle Design and Development initiate a revision to the conditional use permitt for the Maple Greens planned unit development at the following- described property: gBlockoneand .lots one thro 36 block two Sterling Glen Addition, Section 25, Township 29, Range 22 WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1, This conditional use permit was initiated by Castle Design and Develop— ment, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning2 ' iCommissiononSeptember171984, The planning commission recommended too the ci ty counci that said permit be approved. W THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED BY THENO MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above — described conditional use permit revision be approved on the basis of the foll findings—of—fact: 1, The use is ' conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with n y the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that Zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or di strubi ng to the present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust odor. fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference• or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area` properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets police, fire protection, uti schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive addi requirementsremensat publ itq . c cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 11. The revision is consistent with the original planned unit develop Approval is subject to the fol lowing conditions: 1. The applicant vacating the underly platted lots anYgP d street rightsofwayfromtheSterlingGlenAddition, 2. Construction beginning within one year, unless council authorizes a time extension. This proposal shall be considered part of a phased develop-Pmentforpurposesofatimeextensiifnecessary. 3. Adherence to the site plan dated September 11, 1984 with the followingrevisions: as Increase the parking stalls to 20 feet of depth. b. Increase the separation between the open parking stalls and the dwelling units to at least 15 feet. 4. Approval of the site, building and landscape plans by the communitYdesignreviewboard. 5. Submission of an erosion control lan for apPpp by the ci engineer, WHEREAS, Castle Design initiated proceedings to vacate the 'g e publ c interest in the following-described real property: Block one, lots one through 36, block two, Sterling Glen Addition, ti ondtion, Section25. Township 29,.Range 22, including Evar Street and Jessamine Avenue WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. This vacation was initiated b Castle DesiYg 2. mAmaorit of the owners of property abutting said streets have signed a petition for this vacation. This vacation was reviewed by the planning commission September 17, 1984, The P lanning commi ssion recommended to the city council3 ' that this vacati be approved. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that t is in the • public interest to grant the above — described vacation. Commissioner Barrett seconded Aes -- Commissioners Barrett, E l lef son Larson, Pel l i sh, Si gmundi k, Whitcomb y r Action by • , b ifi MEMORANDUM Pei ``---- ---,— Date TO: City Manager FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: No Parking--County Road D. White Bear Avenue to Ari el StreetDATE: September 17, 1984 County Road "D" through this section is a 2 -lane rural section with limited shoulders. Recently, a number of larger trucks have chosen to p ark onthisarea. This not only encroaches on the traveled roadway, but al limitsthesightdistanceforindividualsattemptingtomaketurnsontoCountyRoad D. It is recommended the'city council request Ramsey ount to designateYyeagnateCountyRoadDfromWhiteBearAvenuetoArielStreeta "no- arkin " zone.P 9 Mb Action by ro-,3 ..ter_ . ! MEMORANDUM Endorse Dat e - TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development RE: Planning Fees DATE: October 2, 1984 Council gave 1st reading to this ordinance on September 24th. 2nd reading is recommended. GWO:1nb n ORDINANCE N0. PLANNING FEES Section 1. Section 36 -26 of the Zoninq Code of the City of Maplewood is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 36 -26. Fees . The following nonrefundable application fees shall be required: Zone Change 1.4.0 Special Use Permit 140 Planned Unit Development 140 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 140 Variances: R -1 40 All other districts 80 Vacations 45 Lot Divisions 30 for each lot created Preliminary Plat 140 Home OccuDation Permit 40 for the initial permit and 15 for an annual renewal Final Plat 30 Section 2. Section 36-258 of the sign code is amended as follows: Sec. 36 -258. Fees. 1) A .sign erection permit fee (except for billboards) shall be paid in accordance with the following schedul Souare Feet Fee 1 - 10 $ 1 11 - 25 15 26 - 50 25 51 - 100 60 over 100 110 2) The fee for erecti of bi shall be $8.00,for the first five square feet, plu 47 for each additional square foot. 3) The annual license fee for billboards shall be $215. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect on January 1, 19850 Passed by the Maplewood City Council on Mayor Attest: Clerk Ayes -- as - - -- MEMORANDUM TO: • City Manager FROM Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Questions by Ted DeZurik -- Sprinklers DATE: September 28, 1984 r Action by Endorse Modif i ed_,.,a_ Rejecte . .. Dit 6 Ted DeZurik, from Woodmark, Inc., requested on September 24, that he be allowed to construct an eight -unit multiple dwelling in the Bennington Woods project without sprinklers. Sprinklers are required by appendix E of the State Building Code when a multiple dwelling building exceeds 850E0 square feet or is three or more stories in height. Mr. Deurik is concerned because he presold the units, based on an opinion from his architect, that the eight -unit building should be considered to be two four - unit buildings, because of a fire wall separation. (Sprinklers are not required for a four-unit building.) He feels that he may lose some of these sales if he must raise the price to pay for a sprinkler system. Mr. DeZurik has several specific questions: 10 Can appendix E be modified or replaced with a local ordinance? Answer: no. Dick Brooks, director of building codes and standards for the state, informed me that state law prohibits cities from I modifying appendix E or adopting any other ordinance regulating building construction standards. He was not aware of any changes being proposed by the state to appendix E that would affect multiple dwellings. 'The purpose of the state building code is to provide a uniform standard of construction in the state. Appendix E, however, is optional. But J t must be adopted without change. The city has only two choices -- enforce appendix E or rescind it. Council adopted appendix E on May 23 1983 at the urging of the fire departments. Enclosed is the report that went to the city council in 1983, describing the reasons for adopting appendix E. 2. Could the building be considered as two separate four -unit buildings because of the area separation wall? Answer: not for the purposes of append E. Sect 505 (c) of the building code states 'that "Each portion of a building separated by one or more area separation walls may be considered as a separate building." According to the state building code office, adoption of appendix E supercedes this area of the code . in establishing the maximum allowable gross square foot area permitted in one building. In order to separate the building into two four -unit buildings, the building would have to be divided by two side -by -side exterior walls without openings.. 30 Could this building be considered "grandfathered i " because itn, was approved by the community design review board before appendix E was Answer: no. Appendix E states that its "requirements are applicable throughout the municipality for new buildings . . ." Mr. DeZurik's eight -unit building was not started csr a permit I issued before adoption of appendix E. While the community design review board did approve the overall site plan and exterior building design before adoption of appendix . E, this approval did not include construction plans. Condition one of the board's approval states that "Approval of plans by board does not constitute approval of a building permit. In addition, staff had advised Mr. DeZurik's architect at the time of board approval that appendix E was being considered and that it would apply to his project. 4. Why are two separate water services required - -one for domestic service and one for the sprinkler system? Answer: This is a requirement of the City of St. Paul. It allows the city to shut off domestic service for nonpayment, without shutting off water to the sprinkler system and creating a liability for fire protection. Recommendation Take no action.. 3c Attachment: 5 -13 -83 staff report cc Ted DeZurik 2 TO: City Manager FROM: Building Official SUBJECT: Appendix E-- Sprinklers DATE: May 13, 1983 Proposal MEMORANDUM Adoption of Appendix E (attachment one) , by reference to the State Building_ Code. Adoption of Appendix E would permit the city to require the installation of sprinkler systems in new construction, additions and with a change i n ,the type of occupancy, where such sprinkler systems are not now required. Attach- ment two describes the types of occupancies affected. Attachment three gives examples of how Appendix E would have affected three buildings in Maplewood if they were built under Appendix E. Authority Minnesota State Statutes, 1980 Section 299 F Ol 1 Subd . 4 prohibits municipalities from establishing requirements in excess of the Uniform Building Code. Appendix E was developed by the state to allow municipalities to establish uniform additional standards above and beyond the basic provision of the State Building Code. Purpose Adoption of Appendix E has advantages to the city and building owner. 1 . Increased fire protection. This amendment is highly endorsed by the fire marshal's office and our three fire departments. (See attachment four.) Sprinklers provide increased protection for life and property. 2. Reduces property losses. Attachment five shows the property loss savings that occurred with sprinkler systems in Edina and Duluth. A five -year study of insurance losses by Factory Mutual shows b u i l d i n g s without sprinklers had nine times greater losses than spri nkl ered buildings. In a comparison of two Edina apartment bui l di ngs ,one spri nkl eyed and the other not spri nkl eyed , the spri nkl Bred 13 -story building suffered 1,000 l o.ss and no deaths.. The unspri nkl Bred four -story building, which had heat detectors and an alarm system, suffered $70,000 loss and two dead. 1 Minnesota Mining (3M) states that 98% of their industrial fires were suppressed without fire department personnel in buildings with sprinkler systems installed. The balance of 2% were shelving and other hidden areas. 3M b u i l d i n g 220 6th floor 1 os s was 2 1/2 million . One -third of the floor was damaged by fire. Prior to this fire they chose not to install sprinklers in the total building at a cost of 3/4 million dollars. After the fire, all office buildings in their system not previously spri nkl Bred have had the systems installed. 1 3. Allows more flexible construction. Under the building code, the installation of sprinkler systems allows larger allowable areas, additional stories and substitution of one -hour fire resistive construction in some cases. 4. Cost savings to building owners It could be possible, based on square footage and occupancy, to build a required steel or masonry building of a certain type of wood construction with sprinklers installed, realizing cost savings. Other requirements are also lessened with sprinklers: travel distance to exits and the elimination of required fire alarm systems in public buildings and apart- ment buildings. Manual pull stations result in unncessary false alarms to the fire departments. The b u i l d i n g owner benefits by a reduction in insurance costs, often with a payback within 7 to 10 years, depending upon the type of occupancy. 5. Reduces manpower needed far the fire stations Manpower for firefighters during daytime hours is becoming increasingly difficult to obtain due to increased commitments to work. The building owner, therefore, should take the responsibility of protecting his property.Reduction in personal injury reduces manpower, since firefighters man the medic vans as well. This is an option, not a mandatory provision, based on local fire suppression ycapabi 1 i ti es . Some m u n i c i p a l i t i e s w i l l not adopt this appendix. Initial construction costs would be increased. However, the benefit to the city in maintaining a proficient level of fire protection in the face of additional constructs on and restricted budgets supports the adoption of Appendix E. Recommendation Adopt the enclosed ordinance (attachment nine) which adopts the new Appendix "E" to the State Building Code, requi ri n.g sprinkler systems. jc Vnrl ncijrpc. 1. Appendix E. 2. Types of Buildings affected by Appendi.x E 3. Examples of applying. Appendix E in Maplewood 40 fire Marshal's memo 5. Property loss comparisons 6. Water and manpower requirements 70 'Statement of need and reasonableness 8. Report of the hearing examiner 9.0 Code amendment Attachment one: APPENDIX E Department of Administration Building Codes and Standards division Adopted Rules Governing Amendments to the State Building Code Entitled Proposed Optional Appendix E Automatic Fire Suppression Systems Rule as Adopted NWAR § 1.10020 Optional provisions for installation of on- premises fire suppression systems. A. Ptjrptse•. This rule airthori/e•s optional provisions 10r the irr.t:rll:ttien of on- prenil%es fire sup pre%sion sv%tellls in ne•u. construction. It is intended to alleviate increasing demands for additional fire suppression resources h\• allo« ing a municipality to adopt the optional provisions of this rule based on its local fire suppression capabilities. It. Nitinicipal option. The sprinkler s) requircme•nts in C. may he adopted without chang by a municipahiy. Ifthey are adopted. the regtnreme•nts arc• applicable throughout the nitrnicipality for new buildings. :idditions to htrildliws.:1r)d l)uildings for Itich 111e• occ ttpartct t; lassif is al loo is Changed. C. Require•me•nt%, Automatic sprinkler systems must he installed and maintained in operable condition in htrildin s in the oc.tipanc\ cla-,sifications Iis1e•d in 1. - 1'. This requircilicilt is in addition to other minir»um require•me•nts set in the state huilding code. The h and area increases provided 44 in sections 506 and 507 of the Uniform Building Code. ac, adopted in the state htrillini ct tle t tt+tcl are applicable 1. G A- I occupancre•s. 2. Croup A -' occupancies with an occupant load of' 00 or more. 3. Group A - 2.1 occupancies. 4. Group B -f %crviee' stations with 30X) or more gross sq. ft. of area. not including canopies. 5. Group 13 -1 parking garage's With 5.000 or more gross sq. ft. of area. 6. Group B -_' offices and post- se'ct)ndary classroo with 8.500 or more gross sq. ft. o area or three or more stories in height. 7. Croup B -2 retail. warehouse. or manufacturing areas %k ith 2.000 or more gross sq. ft. ofarcit or three or more stories in height. - 9. Group E -1 and E -' occupancies with 8.500 or more gross sq. ft. in area or tit or more stories in height. except for minor addillons that do not incr the occupant load or significantly incre;t%c the fire load. 9. Group E -3 occupancies with an occupant load of 30 or more. 10. Croup H -4 occupancies with 3.W0 or more gro sq. ft. of area. 11. Grotip R - apartme•nt houses with 8.500 or more gross sq. I't. cif area or with d%veliing snits on threc or more floors. c\ce•pt that when they are not requircd by Uniform Building Code. sections 1807 or 1907. or other provision*, of the state building Code. automatic sprinkler systems within dwelling units in apartment occupancies are considered complete When prttection is pl -twid d in all habitable• room%. Building oflicials, in concurrence: with their fire chiefs, may ac:ccpt alternate systems t which have fire protection capabilities equivalent to systems which comply with Standard 38 of the Uniform Building Code. l?. Group R - 1 hotels and motel% with 8.5M. or more gross sq. ft. of area or with guest rooms on three or more floors. KEY: PROPOSED RULES SECTION Underlining indicates additions to existing rule language. &f4t eats indicate deletions from existing rule language. If a proposed rule is totally new. it is designated "all new material." ADOPTED RULES SECTION -- Underlining indicates additions to proposed rule language. F;Ifike is indicate deletions from proposed rule language. CITE 7 S.R. 1519) STATE REGISTER, MONDAY, APRIL 18, 1983 . PAGE 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OR ADMINISTRATION SAINT PAUL 4 SUILDINO CODES AND STANDARDS DIVISION - 400 METRO SQUARE 7TH AND R08ERT GTS. April 17 , 1984 ST. PAUL, MN 55101 Phoney 612/ 296-4639 i Re: City Adoption of Appendix E of the State BuildingIing Code Dear Mr 'mgr Optional Appendix E is very restrictive in its application to new buildingsandforbuildingsinwhichthe - occupancy classification is changed,. compared to conventional building code standards. Occupancy classi- fication change is governed by 1982 UBC Sections 104 and 502, Appendix E is intended to be restrictive as it is an alternate means of fire protection rather than continued increases in fire fighting personnel8h8Pandequipmentasacitygrowsinsiandcomplexity. Conversely a municipality nay continue to encourage major development as well as residential growth without regard to its fire suppression capabilities. Appendix E is intended to be a standardized super sprinklerP P ordinance for municipalities to adopt based on an examination of its cornittment to fire suppression capabilities. The municipal council must make hard decisions i.e. hire more fire fighters, btu new equipment, build new stations, flinding, responsibilitiesnsibilities to citizens , what do we (council) want as a standard for fire protectioninourcommunity, should future construction pay added cost of fire protection, etc. The key decisions the council must make are: 10 is the present fire suppression capability adequate for the coP$ Y q community as it exists today? 29 Are there resources available to increase fire u rspp ession capability if needed? AN E.OUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Page Two . April 17, 1984 3. Is it equitable to require future construction to build in its fire protection and also be taxed for fire protection services? 4. Is water distribution system adequatequate with proper sizing for sprinklers? 5• Are current construction provisions pertaining to fire P rotection being applied? 60 Will Appendix E discourage construction? 7• Will Appendix E make our co=ninity non -comPetitive? Has the fire suppression capability kept pace withPaYppa growth over the past 15 years? Is Appendix E a substitute for munici 1 responsibility?pa 10. What is the impact of making most buildings- non-conforming?gs rming. Appendix E is much more than a sprinklersprleis are good " provision* AppendixEisamajorpolicydecisionforaco]M=Jty to make as it has considerable impact on future development and existing businesses deciding to' xpanexpand,The adoption of Appendix E Would make most existing structures non-conformingvhichvouldseverelylimitrdel.ing and expansion unless sprinklers are installed. I am sure all possibilities have not been addressed. main pointMYpoisthatitisnot_an issue.to address lightly and pass into regulationwithoutconsiderablethoughtandconsiderationoftheict. A finmPa e line exists between the user pay principle and municipal responsibilityP'a Po Yandequitytoitscitizens. Yours truly, NG CODES & STANDARDS Richard A. Brooks Assistant Director RAB:p Attachment two: Types of Buildings affected by Appendix E Group A Occupancies are dining rooms, drinking establishments, auditoriums and other places of assembly where people gather. All occupancies in this category,wi th an occupant load over 300 persons, are required to be sprinklered by Appendix E. Group B Occupancies are primarily offices, retail stores, warehouses and manu- facturing areas. Occupancies in this category will now require sprinklers i.e. an office building with 8, 500 gross square feet of area or three or more stories must be sprinklered. Under present code a wood frame office building coul. d be built with 8,000 square feet, two stories in height and not be sprinklered. A small retail store of 2,000 or more gross square feet or three or more stories in height would require sprinklers. A retail store of wood frame construction of 2,000 gross square feet is not required to be sprinklered under the present code Group E Occupancies are primarily educational facilities and facilities for day care purposes. The requirement in this category does not change appreciably. Group H Occupancies are hazardous areas, handling, of hazardous and flammable liquids, wood working establishments, areas where loose combustible fibers* or dust are manufactured, and spray painting shops. Group H -4 is a repair gC rage with an allowable area of 5,100 square feet in type V construction. Appendix E would require sprinklers for 3,000 square feet or more of area. Group R -1 Occupancies are hotels and apartment houses. Under present code apartment houses of frame construction would all-ow 5,000 square feet and two floors. Appendix E requires sprinklers for 8,500 gross square feet or with dwelling units on three or more floors regardless of type of construction- - wood fr.ame, masonry, etc. Group R -1 Occupancies , hotels and motels under Appendix E would require sprinklers if the building had 8,500 or more gross square feet or with guest rooms on three or more floors. Attachment Three: Examples of applying Appendix E in Maplewood Holiday Inn Holiday Inn was built in 1977, has 29,500 square feet per floor with a total of 59,000 square feet. Code did not require fire supression system. Appendix E would require the system at 8,500 square feet. Commercial area of Holiday Inn has 16,674 square feet on one floor. The Code in effect when this motel was constructed allowed 10,100 square feet of area and with sprinklers permitted doubling of area to 20,200 square feet. Therefore, the commercial area of Holiday Inn is spri nkl erect to accommodate the number of square feet in this area. Appendix E would require sprinklers for all occupancies with occupant load over 300. Cricket Inn Cricket Inn has 116 units, 4 floors, 45, 569 square feet total with 11,367 square feet per floor. The structural elements of this building are noncombustible, therefore, the present building code would allow 27,000 square feet, 4 stories high, without a s pri n.kl er system. The recommendation of the Fire. Marshal ' s Office required sprinklers, thus it became a condition of the Design Review Board and Council. The motel i s sprinkl ered. Appendix E would require sprinkler system at 8,500 square feet or 3 floors i n height. Emerald Inn Emerald Inn has .68 units, five floors with approximately 30,000 square feet including the penthouse. Building Code today would allow :Emerald Inn to be built as a 4 -story motel. without sprinklers. However, the building is fully spri nki eyed, due to the five stories to comply with the Code. Appendix E would require sprinklers at . second floor because of area. Attachment four April 25, 1983 MEMORANDUM To: Building Inspector Mare4 . From: Fire Marshal A. C. Schad - Subjett: Appendix "E" Sprinkler Systems The new Appendix "F" to the State Building Code is now completed and has been documented in the State Register, volume 7, Number 42, dated April 18,1983. It would be advantageous that this Appendix "E" be included in the 1982 BuildingCodewhichwouldcoudrequireanOrdinanceapprovedbyCouncilaction. This appendix is highly endorsed by ytheCi ' s fi e services from the three contracting departments as well as this office, and we urge your department's support and approval in obtaining the adoption required bylaw. We recommend your department proceed forward in obtaining the properroer Ordinance for Code enforcement. ACS:3s cc Director of Public Safety Fire Departments COO PY r Attachment five COMPARISON TWO IDM APAR'IIV;"T FIIS 5730 VgiaON AvIIMTE 4 stories Approx. 10 years old Heat Detectors 'Throughout Type I Fire Resistive Apartment Within Dwelling Unit Living Ram,/Hallway Roan Unoccupied) Clothes Basket Ignition Source Dnkncwn) OccLpant Entesirg To mntents, Hall Closet Tb Carpet/Interior Ba11 Door to Corr i dar Open To Public Corridor Interior Finish Rated Less than 25) To Adjoining Apartment roger, Doer) 2 Dead VOr000*00 6 i res 24 2 Lar3aers 5 Ien t 3 Ambulances 7 Men toss hife Property I 1, 000.00 1 Egg ine 8 men 7151 YOFT A SO 13 storks 10 years old MN ON Type I Fire Res OCCUP Apartment - El cue r ly FIRE LOCATION Within Dwelling Unit FIRE AREA Living Roam Roan U== ed) FIRE Plastic Decorative Wreath Candle ) Spr inkier /Alarm FIRE GRMMi 7b Television Set Cabinet To Nall MiN ings, Picture Fri OF FIRE Sprinkler r toss hife Property I 1, 000.00 1 Egg ine 8 men C0IWIPARI30N TWO'Duluth Building Fires 1 222 East Second Street Senior Citizen ApkiftFerL Trpe .1 Fire Resistive Seni Apartments Within Dwelling Unit Living loom Occupied) Papers (Pipe) Smoke alarm Smokers, Pipe to newspaper To 14a rack To Overstuf fed chair Spread of Fire checked Ole - Sprinkler $ 3 000.00 West Junior High f 1. 3 Stories ij Cad STRUCTI MI -- r Type 1 F - tireResisti OCCUPANCY School F I Ri LOCAT 101 ---School Office FIRE ARM; -- f of f ice FIRE -IRT --Wooden Desk rs RT --Custodian arriving for Work k I FIRE GRa - ITH —..Desk To Office furniture a Office gutted Fite checked by closed office door Smoke spread th roug . school by vay of ve: system. t L06S l dw 110 Hilh i ght s of F re In the V_..5 . A 26 -page booklet that is a com?rth`nsive study of deaths, fn jur.iss, dollar 1033 and f nci- dents on national, state and local Levels reveals some intere3ting facts about America's fire expe r i e nC e . In order of severity, the f ive roost dangerous occuos-ricies for fire fighters are manufacturing, basic industry, storage, Stores and offices- and vacant and con- struction sites. The fire death problem is espe- cslly serious in large cities and rural on- nunines. Medium sized cities have the lowest fire death totes . The death rates in most rural areas are the highest, highe,r even than large cities. Rural srsa3 and big cities have higher dollar losses per capita fro :ire than do mid - cities . Copies of the report are! available from the rederal Emergency Manage- - ment Agency, 500 C Street S.W.. Washington, D.C. 20472 V. Svrinklers Re3uce Prooerty Losses A recent five - year study by Factory Mutual System shows that doll losses due to fires in buildings without sprinklers are nine -times greater than losses in sprinklered buildings. Fire' in bu i lS i ng s with sprinklers averaged a S32,000 loss, compared to a 201,000 lo3s in non- sprinklered prone: t ie 3 . Firebug Game Brochares Out o Prin The country's fire service has succeeded in haling vi ieo gamo brochures for "Firebug" taken out of print. The gacne has been changed to esca game u3 the five -story spa z e . The alve r _ tieing copy has been modified to reflect the escape from the burn- ing building thee. The coot' originally encouraged Participants to skillfully burn the building and es :aoe detection. Promotion of the game brought a general uproar from fire service, law enforcement and the insurance industry. The Minnesota distribu-- tot of the game agreed to remove the .product from retail shelves following contact with the President of the International Association of Arson Investigators, Minnesota Chapter. Bruce Ryden. Los Angeles Sues to Recover Fire - fighting Costs In what Los Angeles city attorneys believe to be an unprecedented case, the city his filed suit against a plastics company to recover the costs of fighting a fire at its plant. The city con- tends the company was grossly negligent in the storage of higt ly flammable materials on its pr em- ises and had failed to correct legal violations after being order to do so. Contending that the hazardous storage was the cause, of the fire in May, 1983, Los Angeles seeks to recover $200,414 in expenses plus $1- million in pu tive damages. The :om ?any 31 rea dY has pleaded no %P tes and pai 3 4,000 fine for viol3=ion of the fire code. r Attachment six Zteoretically, aye 9a llcn of tez per minute apQlied in a fog pattern sbuld have er,x,, ling poaer bD extinguish 100 cubic feet of fire involving ordinary Combustibles. 'fins, to be able to extinguish a fire in two floors of s 1500 square fcot h (8 f ilis) u18 require: 1500 x 2 = 3000 3000 x 8 a 2400 2400D : 100 = 240 GPM required gallons r minute per 100 cubic s fan expertsis r 3 or 4 g . P'Fire suppre itians , which allows for such tin aisI nent =her Practical •feet for fire ex 9' read the difficultyficulty in dying water s as pings .h1 d ad fire sp , •thing cpe i the theoretical form ul.a to be at of the f i re t as required by d 1 r ectly on the se valid. . over the hoses is related to the of fire f i gh to r s requ i red to taane fibs r are minteu f ire f fighter size of the hose streams. e ,, following requirements on hose streaz s . 100 Gm 2 -3 250 GPM 3 .5 v rs an average of 35 gallons of water per t i cal spr faker head de l lVe nd i cates that aboutYP to of various national or g an i Z a t i a s i auto , arr3 the ' ld i s are extinguished wi or e of all fires f n spr inklered bu 1 ng thr fourths w or two s hems going off . S • r at i onsa, w rep Fire Attack 1 Decl i R vall, ar • . Ba tte . March Street, Bosh. Protection Ass0clation, 60 rY 1973, Kationa.l Fire Mass . , 021101 F99 81 f. e Stream Practices.,. 1980,_ SerViae Training AssOciation, Flr International Fire , Stillwater, gkla nUiversit hcm, 1ittions, Ok3.aa State _ Y Fire Protection Pub 74078, pg• 158 0 4 Attachment seven . STATE OF MZNNESUrA DEPARTMEW OF ADMINISTRATION In the Matter of the Proposed Rules of the Department of Administration STATD:.F•NNT OF NEM AM Governing J4mencInents to the State Building R:ASONIA3LF11M Code entitled Proposed Optional Appendix E 1lutanatic Fire Suppression Systems The abmm captior)ed rules are a proposed optional appendix ' chapter to the State Building Code which authorizes municipalities to require on -site fire suppression systems in certain occupancies. Tt* proposed rules are nee6ed to authorize muni i 1 to acooP t fire all suppression regv i rements, esta5l i shed through information obtained from ro t i ono lly -r ecc>gni zed a xper is , to a protection level higher than currentlyren *_19 Y authorized. V Stats. 1980, Section 299F, all, Subd, 4 prohibits mLmicipclities fran establishing requirements in excess of the requirerrrants of the Uniform 8u,ilding adopted pursuant to IV Staffs. 1980, Section. 16.83 to 16.867 (State Building Code), The adoption of rules establishing ' standards for additional cn site fire suppression systems is necessary o permitYPe municipalities to obtain standards of fire suppressions capabilities not in conflict with provisions of the State Building code when it is determined by the m un i c i pa l i l ty that additional provisions are necessary-and cost e f f es t i ve . Zhe agency's authority to promulgate the proposed rules is contained in W stats, (1980) st 16.85 and 16.86. Zhe expansion of fire suppression and prevention capabilities is necessary for public safety in buildings located in expandin municipalities. A pr unary conce of growing mun i ci 1 i tes f s to establish ba arsce of publicPaaI Opp and private sector fira=ing for fire suppression rotection in newP buildings . where publi sector funding 1 imi i s have been re ached , These rules are a reasonable approach to fire suppression cn the 1 oval level because resources for municipal fire de F pa par tments are limited to current or reduced expenditure levels. The level of fire fighting and prevention9P provi &d is exclusively a local determination. The econvrni c feasibility and reasonableness of adapting uniform regulations in excess of the StateLate 8u11ding Code must be determined by the municipality providing the services and those beating the expense. The establishment of opfional rules for adoption without change are based on a study of na ti orwi de trends of the f ire s r ess ion capabilities ofUPP mmicipal f ire departmen 7his rovides muni cinalities a methodhod to _ establish reasonable additional standards based on local capabilities, During the 1981 session of the Minnesota Legislature,, a bi 11 was introduced permitting local units of ove r nme n t to enact ordinancesinanees r r i n9requiring on -site fire suppression systems as they deemed appropriate. 7he legislation passed the House and was considered by the Government Operations Co mi ttee of the Senate, where tes t u=y was offered in opposition to the bill • one iss of oppos i t i an was that the uniformity rov i ded for i n the State Buildinglain CodeP9 would be destroyed and des! gne rs , developers and builders would be subjected W a vast array of requirements • 'The chairman of the Senate cornet i t tee ded that all affected parties attest to resolve their differences through the rule making process of the Administrative Procedure Act. The Director of the Building and Standards Division subs ntln9i y iapponted a cuts i ttee to review the issues involved and r end how theY Pace 2 ud ght be best resolved. ?die listing of caromi t tee rs is attached to thi Y statement, (Exhibit 1) . 7be carnni ttees first meeting was an July 16, 198]. and after a seri of 15 meetings the final (4th) draft of the Fr oposal was Meted an May 26, 1982. During the cone i ttee deliberations Input was received from many resource per sans , including fire protection` engi f ire department administrative personnel, mechanical engineers, the concrete f ndustry, sprinkler industry, insurance industry, crn ni ttee members, and others. Several informational meetings were held with architects, building developers, building owners and managers, building officials and others, and draft copies were revised following input from concerned persons. r s She consensus of the m rni ttee was to propose an ianal a ndix chapter to the State Building code that could be adopted, without change, at the de s cr e t i on of municipal gone r me n t.s , similar to the existing appendix chapter D relating to building security. A measure of uniformity would thus be mai so that persons affected could quickly ascertain ishether or not the appendix chapter had been adopted by any given municipality, so that structures would be designed and constructed accordingly. 17be curr i ttee believes this approach will be a long term solution to existing and future problen~s. Although Minnesota Statutes do not mandate that municipalities provide fire protection for their citizens, many municipalities are endeavoring to maintain a proficient level of fire protection in the face of additional c+onstr ucti on and restricted budgets flue to cutbacks in resources, Micipalities firmly believe that by provi d i r for built-in fire suppressionun systems in new oonstr ucti on. they can maintain a reasonable degree of protection without building additional fire stations, obtaining new equipment anc supplies, and recruiting additional personnel. Additional resources would M6. _.. a2.so be necessary, to provide tangoing training of personnel; l; ma i ntanen9P"e noe and y operation of equipment , and buildings; as well as additional fire fighter salaries. The cost of providing additional services involves both initial capital outlay plus continuous program ma intanence cos t.s • The Fresno California Cronicle attached ba this statement Exhibit 2t ) suppor the effectiveness of this position. In spite of considerable rowth in areag and population, fire department staffing, equipment and naT er of stations was not substantially i ncr a ased • Recently adopted OSHA regulations impose additional training requirements and safety ipment provisions which laces an additional burdenPp on the ability of munici liter to rovic3a fire protection -Pa p servicecue wl th in reasonable budget levels. The added training requirements may be a deter to obtaining volunteer fire fighters due to increased ocr:rni tents on volunteer fire fighters time. Servi of full time paid fire fighters is bey the budget limitations of t municipalities in Minnesota • OSHA Subpart L. F Register Viol, 45 Nov 179, Sept. 12, 1984 Sec. 1910.156• A listing of paid and volunteer fire deparbnents in the state is attached to this statement Exhibit #3)6 T* Mimesota Fire Chiefs Association has, for years, advocated the extensive use of autmatic sprinkler systems in buildings to control or extinguish fires and reduce ro r t c3ama a losses. In additiontion the arePPeY9y aorcerned about the life safety of building oac nts and fire department persorviel who must enter buildings to suppress fires. Statistics show that multiple death losses are very rare in buildings equippedi with - autcmatic r sprinkler systems thr hout. Pr r t losses are greatly 9 o'Pe` y g tly reduced in buildings protected throughout automatic sprinkler system. m needsPYP are rec3uoed dr amat i cal ly when buildings are protected with automatic Qiti L inklers. Ccnspr tpa,r isons of .fires in CXJ cable buildings with and without sprinklers are attac W tx> this statement Mchibit #4), Wina =-Apartment Building fires; Richfield Hub Center; Duluth, Apartment Building, the installation of sprinkler systems is recognized by the present building oa3e as providing additional fire safety protection, by allowing larger allowable areas, additional stories, and substitution for 1 hour fire resistive construction in same cases . • Sane oust savings can be realized when the wade is researched and applied to a given design, A Concern has been expressed by multi - family .housing developers that increased initial cos will be ',a deterrent to devel nt of m r..h lower arid me de r a to i nca r e housing. Dpa r i e nc a has shown that there is much less clean up and re-- construction after a fire in a spr inklered apartment building, thus allowing r upancy of units gv i Wkly after a fire. 7be early reoccupancy results in additional pay -back of initial investment. Tenants are bene f i tted by the aM i tional safety provided by automatic sprinkler protection. In the proposed rule an exception to ZM.AR Section 1,10020.C.11, was i nmrporated to allow acceptance of sprinkler systems that would provi protection at minimal a to Water supply demands for extinguishment of fires with hose lines are much greater than when automatic sprinklers are used. Fires usually grow rapidly in their early stages., delayed alarms cx' 1 response times are'Y 9 Po serious obstacles to fire extinguishment. On -site extinguishing systemsstems Provide an alarm when the sprinkler system is actuated by heat of the f ire, thus providing an early al arm as well as aonta i anent car e x t i n i shrnent of the fire. Wage S Sna ll fires are usually fought with 1 -1/2 hose lines requiring 2 non per line, ge fires requ i re 2 -1,/2" hose linesnes needing 3 or 4 men r hDSeP'e line. The majority of fires set off a maxinun of 2 sprinkler heads with a discharge 15 to 20 GPM. Water and manpo mr requirements are attached to this statement (Exhibit #5) . Fire resistive oms tr ucti on is required by the oode in many instances, Experience by fire and building depa r tzments , and investigations after fires has shown that fire resistive assmblies have failed during fires. Sme of the factors causing failure are as follows: 1, ft ny sub-Contractors are involved and none of them has total responsibility to assure aampli ante. Zbese sub -- contractors include ceiling installers, electricians insulators ( thermal and aacyisti cal y , sheet metal and ventilation installers, plugs, axnmun i ca t i ons people and others. 2. Frequently, inspectors and plan review personnel are not sufficiently experienced and trained to detect all deficiencies in oomple x assemblies, 3. Many building departments are uruderstaffed, due to budget constraints. 4e eling of buildings often gives rise to the use of substitute materials and as a result ceilings or walls are no 1 ong er f re resistive, and tacm rtn entation is ated,pa neg Page 6 i en f ire mq>pt ess i on of forts are underway pa r tments must be ned tv 9 ain access. In many f nstarnoes this will cause the f ire to spread f rom its P original scarce. Fire fighters advance hoses into stairways and car r i dor s to attack fires. When this occurs, the fire resistive character of such vital life safety areas is defeated. Automatic sprinkler protection tends to offset a the hazards which prevail when fire resistive assemblies have been negated • Minnesota cities are developing a pattern of maintaining a manpower level in their fire die Pa rtments which is minimally sufficient to exting:iish the average size house fire. When the provisions of proposed Appendix E, based on occupancy classification and hazard, are combined with a minimally nt fire department an kmp*table levee 1 of fire extinguishmentsoffacie ,par capability is achieved. Group A Occupancies (public assenbly) acc nodating 300 or more persons, normally have large open areas rather than mall eampartrnents Ccmparbnents help contain a fire, Fire in a large c mpartment can readily defeat a small fire fighting force. Sprinkler protection is needed in order to contain an incipient fire. 7is redwes the chances of panic in a large crowd attempting to flee a 9 rowing fire and allows a smaller fire fighting force to extinguish the f ire. The square footage limitation for GroupoB service stations is restricted due to the nature of the ooc upancy,, Fla=able and combustible liquids greatlyicisreatl increase the fire loading in these occupancies. Even in a small square footage occupancy flammable or, o=Wstible liquids fire can readily over avme an average fire fighting force. Page 7 Group 8-1 (par king garages , consistingsti of large o areas, ,R n9 ge pen eas . do not allow storage other than automobiles * 7he spacing of the autamobi 1es and the fact that fires in an auto are normally aontai ned within the ej i neg or passengers r tment provi die sc.e c3egr ee of assurance in keeping .ping a fire f sol a ted . Due to this fact the square footage 1 im i to t i om for parking 'garages was established at 5 000 square feet, 7h is is more liberal than the Group 8-1 service stations clue to the lesser hazard. Group 8-2 (of f ices and pas t- secondary cl ass roans were assignedinedg a square footage limitation of 8500 square feet. These occupancies are divided into fairly small ccmpar tments which contain a •moderate fire loading of normal nbu i bles. Due to this fact, the corrmi t tee dete that the square footage 1 imi to t i on could be increased above - .the more restrictivtrict ve r eq i r n is of the occupancy groups previously listed. sted. 7he he i h 'Y g t of a building is a critical factor. ardless of are foots 'footage,, the averagera e fire depa r tent would still require additional i ent and manpower to gain a sequFmp g Ices to buildings of over two stories, The Group 8--2 (retail, warehouse and manufacturing Occupancies). were assigned a square foots limitation of 2000 are feet. t. These types of occupancies mrmally contain a high loading of normal cc rmbus t i bles 6ensel Y stored in an open area. Group E-1 and E-2 occupancies (K -12 schools were 'e assigned a square footage limitation of 8500 uare feet 7be characteristicssq . actor i stl cs of these cc - uWci es are similar to Group ^-2, of f i oes and -uP post secondary classrams. K -12 schools are armpr ised of srna ll er cowspminnartments whi help c6 a fires Page 8 Group H--4 0oc i es (repair garages) were assigned a maxim= square footage limi tat i on of 3000 square feet . H-4 Occupan cies have welding and vetting operations, as well as other open f1mes used in areas where flarrrrable liquids are stored and dispensed. B -4 Occupancies have a reater probability9Ps' Y of fire with such fires being more severe in nature due to the highly f l annable and combustible contents. the Group R -1 Occupancies (apertment houses, hotels and motels) were r assigned a maximum square footage limitation of 8500 square feet. 7hc characteristics of these cies are similar to Gr oup B-2 offices and post - secondary classrocus as to caa%Dartmentation &nd ccrnbustible contents. R -1 4ccupanc i es , where the occupants are sleeping, creates a life loss potential not associated with B-2 Occupancies. Hotel and motel c=upancies also present the problem, n that sleeping occupan t.s are rot f sn i 1 i ar with the surroundings which also increases the Y i f e loss potential. R--1 Occupancies require a high level of fire depa, r tmen t manpower for evacuation and rescue purposes . All testimony reoe i ved at the hearing will be given due consideration and incorporated into the proposed rule if determined necessary ana reasonable Date: soo e CD.Wil ss iaNm Page 9 Ift MEW • 1. Attachment eight SATE or KD WrIcr OF AM I ., "-RIMCS PCB UTOMOMn or Mr—INIS"MATM tJIDING CMIS MW s7xwjq= Mr S ION 2h tee Pb t ter of the Pr Wosed Jkj lss of the De e r tvw t of A&i n i s t.ra t ion GzF MCPCPT OF IN is to the state 9u i l.d isg Oade MAP DC EX)PI D h t I t1 &a ? I - go - - A Cpt i ono 1 Append iz = Autcna t.ic Tire &area ion 9yst. fie abom - mtitl ed matter cane on for b" r ing before Hra ring miner deter C• t'ri ckaw of the state Off iae of A &inistrativv lb s rings at 9:30 &,a. can Ned - nes3aY, January S, 1" 3 in ors 406 of the Metro r a Building, seYrrnth and Vabert Stree ft. Poul , Kim* sots • tarry D. Star , is i Ass it Lief t k i= - Ger*rsl, ZD1 Aeinistration Build •s'' Building, SO Sherburne ln,x, !t. lrul, Kfrrc ata 55155o area red on befialf of the Building Mides and stsrda rds Division of the Ri.rnesota Dwe rat of ni ni s tra t i can Ove re ina fter 'AM") . Beard Brooks , At s i stant Di rector for the am Josses Ibis, Deputy Chief of the laul.uth lire De a rt>ierztto srd divert 8rrwdr i do slot!, su i ld irg atf ie al for the City of Vi &field, septa red grid testified for the != In of the • Pt eA rulss. It* tea ring aantinuied w7t12 all interested groups of persons bad had an a4 m w tuni ty to testify m c ernin9 the adoption of the tulas. This Abort SM 11 be a" it able for t*iey to all affected individuals. upon regxst for at hest five working days before the agency takes airy further ' ac- tion an tfie Sole (s). Pursuant to Kira. ! tit. g 1d.16 (2962), the Omissioner of the 1* ;* r t of Mtin is tratice *w 1l, if he progoaes to S&Vt tthe rule as herein, ad t the rule, t ege the r with the ar.: le to hes r irg re=rd to the attorney Grneral and *All be ragpiwalble for ratifying persons who have indi ca ted the t they wish to be notified of such filing. ?f the hiss ioner ss kes cha nqu in the rule other then three herein, be shall suit the rule vi th the ec+epl etc bra ring record to the Chief Haring miner for a review of the changes prior to a tnitting it to the Attorney General for re- viwr. - llased upon 811 the tats t i ar y, exhibits, and written comments, the fearing Zus iner r kes the tollming: tlaD?1wGS OF TACT 3 . On 1 .1 19e21P a* filed -0W folla wing Maesfts with th* Chief **ring lrasainers a) 1l copy of !fie PI Mooed Mlos. 4b) Te Order for lira ring. c) T?* latice of Waring pr to be MY A StO to ernt of the number of pe ream a to attend the hearing and est ime tad length of the ms's prewntat.ion. 2. On r i. 1962, • lbtice of lbaring and a CWy of be pt vpowd 14ruleswerepublishedat7Stategister 23, pp. 8964480 a. On r 2. 1"2 the am as i led the 1bt i ae of 3a r irg to all par sans aVR associations Vt o W registered their cares ritt tie !M for the put- pose of i iving Coca, wt icn w s a. an r s• i!8 ?, tte S fit ad the fol loving is Sri th the llea ring Usainer: a) The 11vtsae of _hearing as tailed. b) The A"T cy's oe rt i f i a t i on that its selling list va s and aampl toy 111 Aff i Davi t of pb i 1 irq the llvt ice to all persons an the hgesx-y'* list. id) 2re Sts torrent of iire aid ble ss . a) 2e races of V= pe r scanne l pe r ewm g 2 rho Will Mpresm the AW cy at the hearing tope the r with the rams of am otiwr wi tars see sol f ci tad. by the AgercY too r an its behalf* f) s ropy of the State yag i stt r coma in ing the ptopomd rules. The doci arnu were awe ilah3 a for Ian at the Otf ice of Aftinistrative aw r ings f roa the date of filing to the data of the hearing. S. The record remained open through Sam ary ?S, 1"3 for the rest ipt of written c= is tnd sta tewnts, the period baying bets by order of tht Bearing tKam.inrtt too M calendar days folloving the hearing. d. S to wtory wt.hori ty to adorpt the Pt tul !s is contairfsd in Rine. State St 16,85 and 1 t. i6 a"7)0 7. During the 1981 legislative aessime a bill was intro& oad permitting oral units of 9c've to onset ordinances requiring on -site fire siacres- s ions sys t e=s as %as d ipprcpriats. 1h is 299i slo tion passed the 1k2K e of e __tbwcrI L tal- perati_ons _0= ttee of the Senate, whert hest in6m in cpQosi tion to the bill was bard, bne issue raised was that the unif oraity proRiW in the State Building Ovde voul d be des trwed send designers, l oilers and builders would be sub jectad to a vast arrvy of roqui ts if 10= emental uni were allowed to pass their own f ire ression ordinamms. The Cha i rmn of the Senate Cmui ttee re000- that all affected parties attempt to resolve their dif fercnoes through the rule-asking prowess of the Sd ni.fris tra tive Procsdurt - The Director of tt a Build COd" acrd Stands rds Division tl y apps inted a =mittee to towserr the fssues LnmlvW and r==zwrd bw they tight beet be resolved. I* Omnittee first ttt an July 16, 1961 end, after a series of 16 meting*, the final (fourth) draft of the 1 late off my 26 1"2. During the oc nti ttee del iberat ions, input eras received fr.= many resource persons, including fire protection wV ineers, fire deppartilent ad- ainistrative persomvel, Nedunieal W191nears, the ccgc& to I. try, sprinkler in&xxtry, insurance industry and cc, !ittee sea ors, mm q others. Sew:ral in- forma t i onal tee tings were bald with a ch itacts, building de4elopers, building ovntrs and managers, and building officials. Draft copies were m sod lbllo*r- Ing inp'u't fron all of those oonc:ered lensi r 1 'the appointed by the Dirac r of the 1= was MOO ail of the f of loving pars": M oyd Lr icksma Hest. Director iii ll i= (b ry - Schwl %cil sties, Ospt. of Associst&d Or eral 4tntractors Mucation i Un G sterland, Wilding effieial ea *Clary lbrth Star--Chaptcr , 3= Patir•d lira thief 2W of the oomm.i ttee was to p1c9cee an optional 1g; W ix cdeptsr to the State Wilding taade which could be , without c:l&:,ge, at eve discretion of smieipal gonrmrnts, similar to the twisting 2 ter D relating to bui ldirg w." uri ty. s measure of uni forRity would thus be w intsired so that peraw s affectad acrd quiclly asaertain +txtter or eat the appar d i s chsptar had barn by OV given mm i eipal i ty, ao but rtrwtum could be des i grad and owns Do. oardirl7• luring this entirt Oatibrratio! piamm " to the present, tim I= tars not isted s notice of intant. to s*ek outside informtim in the lute Pag i star. Kim • stet.: 14.10 (1982) requires as tol lom: 14.10 80LTCMT7tN Or CQ=s =If tea. Um an o gency seeks to obtain inform tion or opini ors In preparing to prspase the adcpti on , aQrendwnt, ev spcz ion, or septa 1 of a rule f role Pou outside of the agency, the 04Mcy hall p &l ish notice of its action in the stater rK is tar and afford all Interested pe r a=s an rtuni ty to wait data or v r*m on tte eutlect of car tern in writing or .orally. h notice acid arty wr material rect i ved by the agency shall be aeae a pa rt of the hca r i ng re rd to be i t tad to tte st tcr- ney W ral ender section 11.199 Cgfas is sMed) uW- ttw Sark of compliance with Kfmo state t 14.10 ww not raisad during the hearing, it is the statutory roopwalbility of the Bearing. ir er to de- to mi ne wba tt*r the Agency t ''fulfil lad all relem t, w tantive prove - dvral requi ts of lfw or rule.' fKinn. stmt.: 14.50 (1967)o e uwjal rule of law is that tactni cal defects in l iance with procedural require nts whi do not reflect bad faith undemining the purFoe of the and which do not pre j ud ice the rights of 0 ace intsr to be prctec:tad by U will not ref ice to overturn I aV*rital action. Ci tv of Ki T. W rte It 291 x.x. 3d 3861 391 Wim • 1980) . his mineral rule teas bee appl ied to tit =3 eaak irk t inns of aftinistra tivae agem ies ut a re the courts haw reW i red only a tantial ooeapl isr:ae . elbte', 2rc • TO Chio state 1MC f r9 C1-vw- i vs i an , 121 1t. t• 7d 453, action d imad. , 130 x • & 2d 455 fWo 19U) : Kim v. Chappie , Wi !. 20 131 Masks 1972)t homer sac, ?.eech i t , r9e Inc. y. lb sh i ngton State U ouot Cbntrol board S75 P.26 721 Pbshingtan, IM) h • 1 (Ctint:. C• Clinton be8s tarp, t.t. X chard A. brooks Director of bq i naerim gas i s tart Di rector Word lrvperties . sui 1 ding cod" t standards Div. , Jere !b iie, tWk?WjW Ckl vi n He 1!i =eyVr , AIR W uth !'ire Vapt . Deputy f f M gal , CkWM 0 An Eck lbrror, Cimral Q awe- 2 ttasas11 Mai* Kim t" K:lti Kos ing Assn* slu ild inq Cef idol We Berner 1b m b. Da tsrby, W r r • fta to Tire MarsW Wilding Comes i stsndar8s -ndv. X i vet t *ndridum 9r t tat" • fir Sipe rvisvt Ki nnesots Tire Ch i e ft Asaoc iation Cb& 0"Atants Ri nre D"r tsnt building Md" G Ibmftrda Div. • lreeent building Official The Iti prsrt Oxirt No yet to spgly the %KAstantial complianov a d trine to deter -ts in t tj ve rulerkirq procsaS a She Murt was ask ad to adopt that dcctrint in Brothers Wholesale Lfg=r v. lbw k , 29S S.1t• M M M nn. 1lt0) , but ref I to do so brresyse the t Cose had Wq•ged in no rul~k i,nq pzvo dngs w w `hie overt dad not bola tM t the &ctrIrue would not be aMi led in an Mpinopriate can and its mMlica 111 ZY o rulesk if Lags Under tta Mkinistrativt h Una Act has MLbm &Mef • ',• erla>, Administrative 141 ens k i in ta 93 Kim* L•NM. 151 z s a979). 3h this mattar lure is no avid" of awry bird fat th an the part of t%e 4enel it the sal lei tstian of outside =mhents and rule drafting prcdurs, Rrttwr, the rfoord shows the t the IN= mode all red uxable attaepts to allo LU off Pezoons md/br gaups to participate in the deliberation pTOaess. Al - tf the tecmical mmis, is in Him, stst. t 11.10 were not I Led with by tare l=, the of ter t statute to bren net. 2xre is no that anyone Ifts p re i ud i cW by t?e failure of tte %= to oamQl y with the pal i - cation ra=1 & mmvt • tbc tly, the 8sa rinq in r finds that the V= bas Nubstarntially lisd• trite+ the statutory %olicitotion• r*ui rents. hh the narrow eirmm tsnc m Of this case, no re ga tive findings or conclusiorm will result. t. bi t SOL grh Kim'*wta statutes do not sicda t a that mm cipal i ties ON 'Weft fire protection for their ri tires , MARY mm is i pal i ties are en&a vo rim to to i nta in s proficient level of lire protsct.ian in the face of add i t icml ccn- struct ion " restricted budgets due to cu tbrck in reso. roes, by prarJAJ q for built -in fin suppression iys tos in raw c omtrvetion, a reascr able &n r>!t of protection can be w intair>wed without additional fire statf ons, obtaini.nq new e qu i Pmt and supplies, and rfcrui tinq add i tiocwa f ire -f i ghtiN per sornal. th experienor of tbd tar, ts, which has hid a 'sprinkler ordiname' !ac the Past 35 ra r s s that &Idcu the populs t i.an of the city has Lncrs ased by 32M0 and the has an add i tior al four square ailes, the marpares rvou i resaents for the fire t have bm rrduwd by six fire-fighters. his is s d ia*et rOPUt Of the i recent that all my a xmtruction be equ i wi tb au tomtit sprinkler sys tans. 2 sn add i t.i on, automatic sprinkler vote= have shorn to bye` both life and P& rty saving 6evioes in coo of t 'fie pr Wile, 2 MCM l 1.10020, yPt is ra l prove s t am for vw tal.lo - tivn Of Cart - Prws.ises !iM Mess im "too, ruthori ms maiicipa 11tt to t . Sri th wt chm'4v , requ ire•ents for the Installation of au tcer t Lc 1winkler eystms in now aunt twction ar sat fcctb in the tjls . Ze rule speci f ies the types of ift &1=r with agsare root rGWitmsents which will fall eider 40 404 4r . . • • nr • s • w • • • • w w • Pursuant to Minn. seat. 1 1 6096, aubd. 9 0198?), the Sm meted• a • ialaeeidant to ttrt Eta to buildinglding mde (Sa. Which Pe rmi ttad tt* Cl o .Ilac:har - ter to adct a sprinkler ord i name. See, Special Pmvj s f ens for ty the City ofPodstarcontainedIntheWiowdiateYprto1VpendixA. _" u tt,oughed*s ter is the -only srun icipe 1 i ty which has been authorised to adopt fire easeprtivisionsditferntthanthestatecede , other srmi cips 1 i tins have also doom so as p.rt of soni 've validity of those rn9te9ulations. egulatians is emstionabl&fir, in light of the requirements of 1iinn. stet. 299r.011n982) , ar0 the minnesota iup& Court' holding in City' of !!inset aka v• Mark1cs isOC, x. .3d 163 ll7S)• r' 1 the *wrinklet W 9 too single frail y ass ideates are not advated by thi s rule. at l+ear ing , the I= be fentences in .. the tole to C a r i - fy amabiqui ties. 'fie last aent&rCW in paragraph C. was aamdol to read, 02,e height and area lsacre a"s prod des in me ions 506 and 507 of the Unif u i 1 d f nq ass in the eta is building Dade are awl 4 100 2n add i - ti on, t+O lest Sentence in ps r aq raph C. l 1. v" am to rand. `iu i l d rag of f i -. Cia l s. in concur rake with their fire chiefs, my accvp alternate systs wh i c h he fire protection eras b i 1 i t i es equivalent to rfs to n which oonply With St&nA&rd 38-1 of the Oniforw building C:dt. • The lbaring Mcm firfs that t?Vese same es+ts dent 1 y Clarity the intent of tte rul and are not sins tan till tdtirges to the rules as Pr Several bui 1 d ing officials meted that the p ruI a Mould trac, +esst fire ocde tequ i rments throughout the state. Am i tionally, those of - f i C1 a 1 s arid the t the svwrt foot revu i rements for each of the ies listed are both arbitrary and ems iwe. s tints were amts tsd to increase the yawn foot r*ou i cements for Oacfi oacvpa ncy 4rouping • 'fie V= contends that this optiotwl. a ix wU2 not f r t the sac tee use if it is ty a amicipality, it dust be in *Ole, t ms frnnentation cm t re- sul t. Wisory board mop . er Petrick J• Oghl in, distant Chief of the Ric t- field Public Safety Depe r t stated that ouantf tatiac fosmlas which relate Ow cubic feet of r size to gallons of rs to r needed per ainute and r requ i rewn is were used to w abl ish the square footage r evu i rswentIa . use computa are briefly described in fthibit S to to Statement of lied and Peasonabl eness • he Kirrvesota Sta builders Association and the riinnesata lLl t i -evus - irq airs sec iat fon IWA and MMEA, to ivlely) both argued tha the safety f" OD tunes provides by the p rule do not justi ty the cost for rule impl awn - to tiara. Zhe WmM points out that Kinn. stet. 1 16. !3, which requires that "the cwnstruction of buildings should bin permitted at the least possible cost con - sistent with roccv, ized standards of bealth and safety dictates against th Pr oposoed rul e. lk*h the ISBA and the WW have sages t ed that paragraph C.11. be amended by deleting the square fact reWi sent and waking the provision applicable only to 6Mel1ings with uni an four or note floors rusher than three or more as pr oQosad . s ch argues that the Is 500 - eqw re -foot tequ i taffies - st crata fined in the rule is too restrictive W that a Owl l ing unit with three floors Cannot be di sti rqui shed frow a typical am-family rexideraat. ter. !h12 as c l am frase the fa r l tomr t i ti rePthanthat !t would host less than 8600 to sprinkle a 1,040 -e* an -foot spo Mi t. 3h ami tion, the , sword atwr+s that insutanoe oast bwwf its rill accrue to the cr w e of NpTinkIWO builAings. If a fire does occur in a sprir*lod building, a reduction in tte .loss of rty ami1br pass i bly lute. will cssul t. 2w Gtr iveticann of the squ re -foot requ i rm ents has !ow 01 cusaerd abcwe. sisi lar ly, b%w sprinkler re W i tow t for "t nt louses which have aremng snits on three or sore Flom two also a pctduct of the equip'too eanpo w r e water denend and rtsent $in formulas. a. W. 1til kin berger, testifying on behalf of the mlrvwsota society of Arch i sects. syggested that the term ' autcsr t is sprinkler systssc • shm 16 be Ward throughout the rule rather then initial we of the tem Of ire supress ian, s . U systo s •. The tawts, Of ire supprv=ion systws % teas uma in the pr. rul loye r, to ill ew !or the incl us ian of other types of sys taus in tts rule by - try of later mi onto As 40iNOW by the 1= abet. the Bearing t wP i ne r finds tha the naed for and r%tsorablestess of die 2 MM ! 1.10020 has been rated by an Of i =rs tier presentation of facts in the crcord, Secause of the optional nature of thi PCqPosed Ix to the MC, each sm is i pa l ity will have the oppm tuni ty to often the cos t-ef fect i of this rule in light of its own treds . If tun is ipal i ties ae to mine that this rule is too rws t r ict ivt to be Ode the SM VVY be !`ortcsd to rscans i der acme of the provisions con to ined therein. 2)ere were ~Ame W x2ges tad to tht proposed rule which are rw - aubl a alternatives, however. The Rearing ixarni ner points out tha ssry twit- WN cents were cave i ved f rc s, fire chiefs, fire oa rsha ls, mayors, and f ire - fioter organizations throughmt, the state which endorse the rule as propred and rvpport Its rsasorWileness as a tearsre for fire protact i on aid bud - geta ry cacn teal for tarn i eipal "I. ft. lttsed the foreV ing bindings of le.-t, the Bearing bcwdn rw r takes the following CDC IM 1. Zhat the Build L:de Division gave prcQer riot ice of the hearing in this enter. 79 that the KM has fulfilled the proaedvral reou i remen of Kim. Sta t. t . 1 and 2 aye z and all other procedural roqs i ree+ents of law or rule. 2. %w t the SM he s dactiteen ted its statutory authority to ' iaopt the pro - posed rules, " has fulfilled all other substantive sego i z- nts of law car rule Within the owning of tKinn. stit. is 1 lubd. It 1401 std 3 srd l 1. SO (i) and (ii) a"2)0 t. ?teat the 31= has 6emw stratea the toed for and reasonableness of the - proposemd rules by an off i aria t ive presentstiom of facts in the record within the tf of !lizn+o ltat. ae 14014 sued 2 and 110 SO (iii) illt2) . s. Zhat the additions and aaerdaents to the proposed rules which were e ages ted by the V= after p jbl i c+ t i cn of the propooed rules in the Stao hag - lster 6o not noult in rules wbic h are substantially different from the pro peed rules " in the State kg i ster within the mening of !Minn. stet. a 24015, subs. 3 a "2) awed ! M f 26110 A. and 2.11l (1,010 m.) . S. that m lW ings which night properly be tsr OXCI us ions and reel mncl us i ons which aight pr c erl y be tosw tiryd i ngs are itsruby &&med as surd. 7e that a f 1WL q or o elus ion of need and raawnableness in regard to a particular sole Lon floes not procl ude ww4 should not discourage the ft= fur"wr cadification of fete rules hood UPW an emadmination of the publ is C RMW ti, provrided that no substantial change IS wade leas the ry1 es as original l y publ i shed, a+d prov160 that the rule MOW adopted is bawd facta appearing in this rule hearing record. _ bared Ole logo I ng .Qonc l us i ens , the l ea r ing 2 'a Fi i ne r sa k*s the fol - 3oriq: • It is hereby r rddtd that the ptt rules be adopteA Dons i s tm.n t With fit Finn i nqs and MrClus i ons sae abavt • voted this daY of Pet+tuery. 2"3. tv Pik': fF C. v I jza; r f nq bcacai ne r kuported : . i'• S R I N1:LER RE UI REMEHTS 12/15/82 occupancy Group q Y • •• 1919 UBC R ts City of Rochester Appendix E opti per Ch.38 amendments I proposed 1983 a[ C All areas Al 00+ occupants Al l areas sear stat 3000+ a ra e s 5000+ off b school 8500+ or 3 st.+ retain & stor 2000+ or 3 st.+ 8500+ or 2 st.+ 8500+ or 2 st+ A11 w/ +29 occu C rD L +20200 or 4st Zn 1 8500+ or 3 st.+v apartments, R -1 0 , hotels — +30000 Zone 3 8500+ or 3 st.+ T dwellings R -3 — 100x+ w sta a AA -1 C v+ 10 -A -2 a CO a WI o ,- f 300 AA -3 - o° stadiums.etc.M &ft fa 0 Oww rp L 4 i NN w servicece state a ra es arm 4A rretail,stor,of oo -2 aa retail +12C00 IPOQschool +12t °hi h ile stor r hang stor 88 -3 cc non core s or -C arm CC) M C) coo X -'— CCIQ c o R s c a Aj o U tth ru 12th 50+ EE -1 11: • ° o tthru 12th -50 LL -2 44- -5 day care, etc EE -3 • L 44- 4- M iJ N N O V'E L L tai materials HH -1 >o +1500 4A ff l am 1 i ui ds HH -2 °r. N +1500 c ddust 2enerat HH -3 3000 repairr ara es HH- oo C 8400 Zone U2Pr- o Zone 3 s repair hang HH -5 E 4.: N 00 l C Nos nurs hm II -1 8 su rvd. live 11 -2 arm men 1 'ail 11 - 3 LL L o NN r.- L D Q O All areas Al 00+ occupants Al l areas sear stat 3000+ a ra e s 5000+ off b school 8500+ or 3 st.+ retain & stor 2000+ or 3 st.+ 8500+ or 2 st.+ 8500+ or 2 st+ A11 w/ +29 occu C rD L +20200 or 4st Zn 1 8500+ or 3 st.+v apartments, R -1 0 , hotels — +30000 Zone 3 8500+ or 3 st.+ T dwellings R -3 — Attachment nine J ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION NINE OF THE MAPLEWOOD CODE RELATING TO SPRINKLERS THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 9 -22 of the Maplewood Code is hereby amended to read as follows (additions underlined, deletions crossed out) : Sec. 9 -22. Procedures and administration. As provided by the state bui 1 di n.g code, the following appendices of the state building code are hereby adopted by reference: Appendix A - -Fall Out Shelters Appendix B--Variations in Snow Loads 4979 1982 Uniform Building Code Appendix Chapter 35 Minnesota Plumbing Code Appendix B State Building Code Appendix C-- Abbreviations and Addresses of Technical Origin 4979 1982 Uniform Building Code Chapters 12, 48 49, 55, 700 Minnesota Plumbing Code--Appendix C, D State B u i l d i n g Code Flood Proofing Regulations--Section 201.2 through 208.2 Appendix E -- Sprinklers Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after passage and publication. Passed by the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota this day of I , 1983 Mayor Attest: Ayes-- Clerk Nays -- October 2, 1984 MEMORANDUM To: Public Safety Director Kenneth V. Collins From: Deputy Fire Marshal James Embertson Subject: Appendix E Amendment to the State Building Code Enclosed are documents that were presented to the City Council when the sprinkler ordinance was originally proposed for approval. Enclosed in this packet were the statement of need and reasonableness, hearing examiner report and comparisons of fires that occurred in spri nkl ered buildings and unspri nkl Bred b u i l d i n g s . The advantage was of the muni ci pal i ty requiring built.-in fire protection to be the burden of the developer, as opposed to the developer putting the responsibility back, on the municipality after the development has been completed. The average costs per installation have been under $20,000, as compared to. the last pumpers delivered in this city, which have been $120,.000 to $155,000 per unit. This all adds to the city's responsibility and burden of the fire departments budget, excluding the manpower required, which also must increase. Perhaps the problem of the cost is not with the fire service, but with the St. Paul Water Department and their stringent requirements of the double service and multiple header required where utilization of a single service to supply the domestic and fire l i n e could be separated inside the building with a double gate valve and detector check. This - wo -ul -d also delete the seven -foot area required for the exi sti ng header system. With a coordinated effort by construction, developers, League of Cities and other organizations, this could be a reality. In the 1983 annual report . by the State Fire Marshal's office, apartment buildings rated third highest in fire deaths. Smoking material rated number one in cause for fire deaths, and fireplaces and wood stoves rated number two. In the complexarticular i n qquestion, which is of wood -frame construction, manyP units have wood - burning appliances. In multiple living units, you are relying on other occupants of the building to use utmost care; but fires do occur, especially in unoccupied units where fires rogress to greater magnitude before detection. Therefore, whereP heldsprinklersarepresent, extinguishment procedures are immediate or are h e in check until fire department personnel arrive on the scene. When water beginsP to flow, an alarm is sounded, where smoke..detectors have been known to fail and fire P arti ti ons have failed As time passes, either by neglect, servicemen or other modifications to the building. Past history has proved this many, many times. A recent multiple dwelling fire in Maplewood in one unit caused three units to be uninhabitable due to smoke damage and excessive water, which was required to - extinguish the fire, where in a spri nkl eyed unit the damage is usually confined to one unit. By increasing sprinklered (.protected) properties, cities have increased area boundaries and population and yet decreased fire department personnel and are still supplying adequate fire protection. The silent sentries are the vanguard.....now and in the future. JME : j s Enclosures EAST COUNTY LINE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT Station #1 - Station #2 117 Century Ave. ., 2501 Londi Lane Maplewood, MN. 55119 Maplewood, M 55119 September 28, 1984 Barry Evans City Manager City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood MN 55109 Dear Barry: We request and support the adoption of Appendix E because: 1. It is at this time a vital method by which a community may accept reasonable fire loss potentials through proven protective systems in times where nationally and locally it is becoming extremely diff icult to recruit, train and maintain volunteers. 2. Built --in protection systems should be expanded in con struction in hopes of reducing the demands on volunteers' family and personal time and should also control the need to expand fire force manpower needed for increased con- struction without protective systems. 39 Most sprinkler systems will be paid for with reduced insurance rates and an honest developer should be willing to bear the initial cost. 4. Sprinkler systems may offset and somewhat lessen real concerns about l i f e safety and fire flow requirements in poor water supply areas. 5. No one has been more stringent than Bloomington for 15 years and the proof i there. 5. Maplewood's geographic layout has and is already taxing fire service capabilities and without a strong application of built in protective systems,the time is coming where it may not be adequate 'for a growing. community and extreme costs to the city may be necessary Page Two 7. If the 3M complex was not provided with built -in systems, there would be some real problems with providing adequate fire protection in today's fire system. Sincerely, Duane Williams Chief cc: Jim Embertson Deputy Fire Marshal Maplewood, Minnesota 55I09 Gladsto Station Hazelwood Station Fire phone - 777-8 1900 CLAREN`E STREET 1530 EAST COUNT" ROOD C Business Phone 770 -4523 Business Phor,e 770.1163 September 30, 1984 MEMORANDU To: City Manager Barry Evans From: Gladstone Fire Chief Dennis S. ick Subject: Appendix E Amendment to Minnesota State Building Codes It has been brought to the attention of the fire service that the City Council has considered a review of the status of Appendix E to the Minnesota State Fire Codes within the City of Maplewood. The G o PGladstonenefireDepartment is in. complete support of the City Council's action of May 1983 in which they made applicable Appendix E to the City of Maplewood. Experience yhasshownthatearl automated fire detection and suppression has primarilyrimarily responsible for the reduction in loss of life and significantl reduced property loss. It is well documented withi the fire service that an averag fire will doubl in size every two minutes and that the first five minutes of any fire is most crucial to a successful extinguishment. The City of Maplewood, through its volunteer fine departments, relies heavily on modern tec for the proficient control and extinguishment of fires. The addition has provided such technology.of Appendix E to the Minnesota .State Buildingd ng Cod e p 9y . Should ou desire additional documentation or feel that a presentation to the y City Council will be of value, please advise me. Thank you for your attention to this position. DSC:js PARKSIDE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC. 7001 MCAff.NEMY ROAD MAPIEYOOD, MINNESOTA 33117 IOlil 7160174 Barry Evans October 1, 1984 City Manager City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Ave. Maplewood, Mn. 55109 Dear Barry It is the contention of myself and the members of this department that any and all support possible should be given to Appendix E of the State Building Codes. Whenever there is a loss of life in fires it can useall k y : - bie= traced to a lack of detectors and or Ysprinklers stems. Statistics show that sprinklers notP only Phel to contain fire to reduce property loss, but also buy time for occupants in structures to escape unharmed. :.. In a. day and age when we have so many technical devices to help mankind,it would seem a shame not. to use some of the 9 reatest life saving devices from fire that we have. If the fact of the dollar losses saved does not affect Pou lease consider the number of lives thatY could be lost if the building codes were to be relaxed. With Great Concern Thor 8odsg rd, Executive Chief Parkside Volunteer Fire Department s MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: DATE: Requ City Manager Di rector of Community Development Driveway Permit 2800 White Bear Avenue William Todd September 26, 1984 3 Action b:,' Endors F d. -. Modifie ReJected..., Dat e Special permission to keep a concrete slab, that is part of the driveway, within five feet of the south property line Proposal 1. Mr. Todd constructed a concrete slab adjacent to his garage several years ago without a permit. The slab is an extension of the driveway and used for parking. It was built approximately five inches onto the adjacent lot. Mr. Todd has recently cut off about 1.5 feet to get all of the slab on his. property. 2. Section 29 -120 of city Code states that "driveways shall have a setback of at l e a s t five feet from the side or rear l lines, except by written agreement with the owner of the adjacent l or where the city council or community design review board approves a lesser setback. In order to approve a driveway, within the five foot setback, without approval of the adjacent owner, the city shall notify the adjacent owner at least ten days before the meeting. The, council must make a finding that the drive would have no adverse effect on the adjacent l or owner. The council shall include the following considerations in determining adverse effect. a. Snow storage b. Proximity of the drive to an adjacent house c. Difference 'in grade elevations d. Drainage e. Headlight glare f. Noise g. Berms 3. Section 29 -123 states that "if the drive is illegal constructed within the setback, the city may require that the portion of the driveway that is within the setback be removed." 4. The driveway is also within the five foot setback. It was constructed before the code was adopted, however, and no permit is required, Comments The adjacent owner, Mr. Bobel dyk, has constructed a three foot high retain- ing wall at the property line that prevents Mr. Todd's slab from having any adverse effect on Mr. Bobel dyk.' s property. f. r , Recommendation Approval to keep a concrete slab within the five foot setback. Approval is based on the f i n d i n g that the drive would have no adverse effect on the adjacent lot or owner. iw Attachments 1. Property line /zoning map 2. Site plan 3. Letter 1 L. it . 1 4 4 ac C arctv . 2.e ar •- 4. Q t dW . Cj 10 r r , L • IM Wu O IN1 a O re - c _ t ,too 5 . rGa` (5,521 '-s d S 8 S e Z S G r 9 AFLI • I AVE*wan . W.- 00 zoo ^ c_ o t •4•o Ito oo 7 LC ° J Z 13 UA- 2M p Co 020 O rj do t- 1St•la ; t'C 4 SO ! BE t _ 7 - Njlhor 14 i 1 2 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 3 Attachment 1 I SL - j a I 2 Sc a v' G L,T i 5 1 L. it . 1 4 4 ac C arctv . 2.e ar •- 4. Q t dW . Cj 10 r r , L • IM Wu O IN1 a O re - c _ t ,too 5 . rGa` (5,521 '-s d S 8 S e Z S G r 9 AFLI • I AVE*wan . W.- 00 zoo ^ c_ o t •4•o Ito oo 7 LC ° J Z 13 UA- 2M p Co 020 O rj do t- 1St•la ; t'C 4 SO ! BE t _ 7 - Njlhor 14 i 1 2 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 3 Attachment 1 a a N William M. Todd 2800 Fh i t e Bear Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 September 4, 1984 Mr. Geoff Olson Commun itv neve lopment Director 1902 E. County Rd. B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Gentlemen: I would like to apply to the City of Maplewood for a variance regarding the concrete slab located on my property at 2800 white Bear Avenue. This slab extends a few inches onto Iry Bobeldyke's property. I have asked Mr. Bobeldyke on three different occasions if he wanted me to cut off the slab and he said "No, its not necessary its no problem,P He has since put a wall right on top of the stab so I must cut it off at the property line or the weight of the wA11 will eventuall y crack the slab, Again, I would like to cut the slab off at the property line, however, I am willing to comply with whatever the City Council's decision is regarding this. Thank you . Sincerely, William M. Todd cc. Maplewood City Council 5 Attachment 3