Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984 08-27 City Council PacketAGE "N DA Maplewood City Council 7:04 P.M. Monday, Auqust- 27, 1984 Municipal Administration Building Meetinq 84-19 (A) CALL TO ORDER (B) ROLL CALL (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Meeting 84 -16, July 23, 1984 .20 Meeting 84 -18, August 13, 1984 (D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA (E) CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion in the farm listed below. There will be no separate discussion on these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered senarately. 10 Accounts Payable 20 Time Extension: Crestview 3rd Addition 3. Preliminary Plat & Variances: Tilsen s Maplewood Heights #13 4. Parks Capitol Improvement Projects to be Cancelled (F) PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 Environmental Protection /Critical Area Ordinance - 4 Votes 2. 7:10 Code Amendment: Rezoning with Platting 4 Votes 30 7:20 Street vacation Ripley Ave. .(Huppert) 4. 7:30 Variance: Co. Rd. C (Goff) .(G) AWARD OF BIDS (H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Reconsideration - Podawi l tz (I) NEW BUSINESS 1. Car Dealership in M -1 Zone: Mitsubishi 2. Tax - Exempt Mortgage Revenue Bond Financing - Multiple Family 3. I . D. R. ' s - New Regulations 4, City Hall 3 S i �r MINU TES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, July 23, 1984 Council Chambers, M u n i c i p a l Building Meeting No. '84 - 16 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was h e l d in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Greavu, B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Absent MaryLee r4aida, Councilmember Present Michael T . Was i 1 uk , Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Meeting 84 -14, June 25, 1984 Councilmember Was i 1 uk moved that the Minutes of Meeting No. 84 -14, June 25, 1984, be approved as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. D. APPROVAL -OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. McKnight-and H i ghwood 2. Garage Moving Ordinances 3. Legislation - Used Car Sales 40 Reso 1 utu i n - Metro Council envo 1 vement with Water Board Seconded by: Counci lmember Was i 1 uk . Ayes - all, 'E. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Maida moved, seconded by Mayor Greavu, Ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda as recommended: 1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part I, Fees, Services, Expenses - Check Register dated July 13 1984 - $58 Part II Payroll dated July 13, 1984 - $69,,421,63) in the amount of $127,470.46. 2. Afton Heights Park Assessment Approved the payment of $4,523.00 for the assessments against Afton Heights Park and the funds be appropriated from the unallocated non -res i dent i a 1 ' PAC Fund. 7/23 F, PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.. 7 :00 P.M. Home Occupation - 2308 Dahl Court (Rozsa) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a p u b l i c hearing q the request , ermit of Mr. George Rozsa, 2308 Dahl Court, for conditional use p for an office supp sales home occupation. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c Director of Community Development Geoff Olson resented the following l owi n Planning p g Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend that the Cit y C o u ncil adopt the following resolution: WHEREAS, George Rozsa initiated a c o n d i t i o n a l use permit to operate C and G office Products as a home occupation at the following described property: Lot one, Block two, VanDah 1 Addition, This property is also known as 2308 Dahl Court, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use ermi t i s as follows: p 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by George Rozsa, p ursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reveiwed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on Ju 2, 1984. The P l a n n i n g Commission recommended to the City Council that said permit be approved. WHEREAS, Section 36 -66 of the City Code requires home occupations to conform t q p o the following requirements: 1. No more than one person, other than members of the fami residing on the re- p mi ses , sha be allowed to engage in such occupation, 2. An area equivalent to no more than twenty (20) percent of each level of the d w e l l i n g unit floor area shall be used in the conduct of a home occupation. 3. There shall be no change in the outside appearance of the building r remises � 9 premises, that would indicate the conduct of a home occupation, other than one sign meeting the requirements of the City Sign Code. 4. Limited retail sales of products produced off -site may be permitted, but onl y when subordinate to the principal activity of the home occupation. 5. No traffic shall be generated by a home occupation i n 9 reater volumes than would normally be expected in a r e s i d e n t i a l neighborhood. The need for off-street parking shall not exceed more than three off - street parking spaces for home occu p at- ions at any given time, in addition to the parking spaces required by the resident occupants. 6 No equipment or process shall be used in such home occupation which creates noise, vibration, g l are, fumes, odors or electrical interference detectable to the normal senses off the lot. I n the case of electrical interference, no equipment - 2 - 7/23 or process shall be used which creates visual or audible interference in any radio or television receivers off the premises, or cause fluctuations i n l i n e voltage :off the premises. 7, No fire safety or health hazard shall exist. 8. A home occupation shall not include the repair of internal combustion engines, body shops, machine shops, welding, ammunition manufacturing or other objectionable uses as determined by the City. Machine shops are defined as places where raw metal is fabricated, using machines that operate on more than one hundred twenty (120) volts of current. 9. Any violation of these requirements shall result in the denial or revocation of the home occupation. 10. Approval shall be for a period not to exceed one year. Renewal shall be subject to the p r o v i s i o n s of Chapter 17, Article II, of the City l i c e n s i n g code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the above described c o n d i t i o n a l use permit be approved on the basis of the f o l l o w i n g findings of fact: 1 . The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive p l a n and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment of maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3.. The use would be located, design, maintained and operated to be compatible with the, character of the zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, elec- trical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal v e h i c u l a r traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that w i l l cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets,, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive a d d i t i o n a l requirements at p u b l i c cost for p u b l i c f a c i l i t i e s and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following c o n d i t i o n s : 1. The following items shall be provided: - 3 - 7/23 a. A fire extinguisher b. A single station smoke detector in the stoarge and office areas of the basement. 2. The applicant must obtain the annual license for a home occupation. Commissioner S 1 etten seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdah l , E 1 l of son, Fischer, Hejny, Larson, Robens, Sigmundik, Sletten Whitcomb. d. Mr. George Rozsa, the applicant spoke on behalf of his request. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f . Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard: Mr. William Parker, 1058 Marnie, representing the resident at 2300 Dahl Court. g. Mayor Greavu closed the p u b l i c hearing. h. Counc i lmember Ma i da introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 84 - 7 - 106 WHEREAS, George Rozsa initiated a cond i t i ona 1 use permit to operate C and G Office Products as a home occupation at the following described property: Lot one, block two, Van Dahl Addition This property is also known as 2308 Dahl Court, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of t h i s conditional use permit is as f o l l o w s : 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by George Rozsa, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on July 2 , 1984. The P l a n n i n g Commission recommended to the City Counc i 1 that s a i d permit be approved. - 3. The Maplewood City Council h e l d a p u b l i c hearing on July 23, 1984. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing. were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council a l s o considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and P l a n n i n g Commission. WHEREAS, Section 36 -66 of the City Code requires home occupations to conform to the following requirements: 1. Not more than one person, other than members of the family residing on the premises, shall be allowed to engage in such occupation. 2. An area equivalent to no more than twenty (20) percent of each level of the dwelling unit floor area shall be used in the conduct of a hone occupation. 3. There shall be no change in the outside appearance of the building or prem- ises, that would indicate the conduct of a home occupation, other than one sign meeting the requirements of the City Sign Code, - 4 - 7/23 4. Limited retail sales of products produced off -site may be permitted, but only when subordinate to the p r i n c i p a l activity of the home occupation, 5. No traffic shall be generated by a home occupation in greater volumes than would normally be expected in a residential neighborhood. The need for off- street parking shall not exceed more than three off street parking spaces for home occupat- ions at any given time, in addition to the parking spaces required by the resident occupants. 6. No equipment or process shall be used in such home occupation which creates noise, v i b r a t i o n , glare, fumes , odors or e l e c t r i c a l interference detectable to the normal senses off the lot. In the case of electrical interference, no equipment or process shall be used which creates visual or audible interference in any radio or t e l e v i s i o n receivers off the premises, or caused fluctuations in l i n e voltage .off the premises. 7. No fire safety or health hazard shall exist 8. A home occupation shall not include the repair of internal combustion engines, body shops, machine shops, w e l d i n g , ammunition manufacturing or other ob ject i oanab l e uses as determined by the City. Machine shops are defined as places where raw metal is fabricated, using machines that operate on more than one hundred twenty (120) volts of current, 9. Any violation of these requirements shall result in the denial or revocation of the home occupation. 10. Approval shall be for a period not to exceed one year. Renewal shall be subject of the provisions of Chapter 17, Article II, of the .City Licensing Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the f o l l o w i n g findings of fact: 1 . The use is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive P l a n and with the purpose and standards of this Chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare, 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district, 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution water run-off, vibration, genera 1 unsightliness, e l e c t r i c a l inter- ference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that w i l l cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. - 5 - 7/23 3 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for p u b l i c f a c i l i t i e s and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design, 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects, Approval is subject to the f o l l o w i n g conditions: 1. The following items shall be provided: a. A fire extinguisher b. A single station smoke detector in the storage and office areas of the basement. 2. The applicant must obtain the annual license for a home occupation. 3. Sidewalk constructed to the North and South of 2308 Dahl Court. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - Mayor Greavu; Councilmembers Maida and Wasiluk. Nays - Councilmember Anderson, 2. 7:05 P.M. RLS - 2055 E. Larpenteur Avenue a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a p u b l i c hearing regarding a request from the Maplewood, North St. Paul-Oakdale School District No. 622 for approval of a registered land survey to divide the school district's property at 2055 E. Larpenteur into (8) eight lots. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Geoff Olson presented the following P l a n n i n g Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Fischer moved the P l a n n i n g Commission recommend the City Council approve the preliminary RLS of the Maplewood -North St. Paul - Oakdale School District's property, at 2055 East Larpenteur Avenue subject to: 1. The City Engineer shall approve the maintenance provisions of the access and utility easement over Tract D to serve Tract G. 2. The southerly lot lines for Tract G must be shown, by land survey, to comply with the setback requirements of the Uniform Building Code. Commissioner He jny seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdah l , E 1 lefson, Fischer, Hejny, Larson, Robens, Sigmundik, Sletten, Whitcomb." d. Mr. Brian Buckmeier, representing the School District, spoke on behalf of the request. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard: - 6 - 7/23 Mr. Thomas Weyandt, 1721 Ruth Street; Mr. David Moecke 1, 1722 Ruth Street. g. Mayor Greavu closed the p u b l i c hearing. h. Councilmember Maida moved to approve the Registered Land Survey as requested by School District 622 to divide their property at . arpen eur Avenue into eight o s. , Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. i .\ Counc i lmember Ma i da moved to refer the question of the Price Street access to the staff. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all, 30 7:00 P . M. - Alley Vacation : Ar i e 1 and County Road C a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Nancy Gaston to vacate an alley right of way west of Ar i e l Street and South of County Road C. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development presented the f o l l o w i n g P l a n n i n g Commission recommendation: "Whereas, Nancy Gaston initiated proceedings to vacate the p u b l i c interest in the following described real property: The alley right of way south of lots one through six, block one, Maplewood Addition to North St. Paul, Section 11, Township 29, Range 22 WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as f o l l o w s : 1. This vacation was initiated by Nancy Gaston on June 15, 1984; 20 A majority of the owners of property abutting said alley right of way have signed a petition for this vacation. 3. This vacation was reviewed by the Planning Commission on July 2, 1984. The P l a n n i n g Commission recommended to the City Council that this vacation be approved. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above described alley, p u b l i c interest in the property will accrue to the following described abutting properties: Lots one through six and lots 25 through 30, block one, Maplewood Addition to North St. Paul NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood P l a n n i n g Commission that it is in the public interest to grant the above described vacation on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1 . This alley right of way serves no p u b l i c purpose. 2. It is in the best interest of the p u b l i c to vacate the right of way. Commissioner Ellefson seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Ellefson, Fischer, Hejny, Larson, Robens, Sigmundik, Sletten, Whitcomb." - 7 - 7/23 d. Ms. Nancy Gaston, administrator for the Dorothy McNaughton estate, spoke on behalf of the request, e. Mayor Greavu called for.proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Counc i lmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 -7- 107 WHEREAS, Nancy Gaston initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following described real property: The alley right of way south of lots one through six, block one, Maplewood Addit- ion to North St. Paul, Section 11, Townshzp29, Range 22 WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. This vacation was initiated by Nancy Gaston on June 15, 1984; 2, A majority of the owners of property abutting said alley right of way have signed a petition for this vacation; 3. This vacation was reviewed by the Planning Commission on July 2, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that this vacation be approved. 4. The City Council h e l d a public hearing on July 23 , 1984, to consider t h i s vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above described alley, p u b l i c interest in the property will accrue to the following described abutting properties: Lots one through six and lots 25 through 30, block one, Maplewood Addition to North St. Paul, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood City Council that it is in the p u b l i c interest to grant the above described vacation on the basis of the f o l l o w i n g findings of fact: 1 . This alley right of way serves no p u b l i c purpose. 2. It is in the best interest of the p u b l i c to vacate the right of way. Seconded by Counc i lmember Was i 1 uk . Ayes - all, 4. 7:15 Code Amendment - Cul -de -Sac a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a p u b l i c hearing regarding a proposed code amendment to increase the minimum required diameter for the terminus of cul- de-sacs from 1.00 feet to 120 feet. - 8 - 7/23 b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. ' . c. Director of Community Development presented the following P l a n n i n g Commission recommendations: "Commissioner He jny moved the P l a n n i n g Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the proposed ordinance to increase the required right of way diameter for cul-de-sacs from 100 to 120 feet. Commissioner S letten seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdah l , E l lef son, Fischer, Hejny, Larson, Robens, Sigmundik, Sletten." d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Anderson moved first reading of an ordinance to amend the Code to I increase the minimum required diameter for the terminus ot cul-de-sacs from iuu eel - - to 1 - 20 feet Seconded by Councilmember Was i l uk . Ayes - all. 5. 7:30 P.M. - Fiddler Liquor License a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Bernard's Food and Cocktail, 3035 White Bear Avenue, for an On Sale Intoxicating Liquor License. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Mr. Michael Black, attorney representing the applicants, spoke on behalf of the request. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolutio and moved its adoption: 84 - 7 - 108 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that pursuant to action by the City Council of the City of Maplewood on July 23, 1984, an On S a l e Intoxicating Liquor License was approved for Thomas Selwold dba Bernard's Food and Cocktail, 3035 White Bear Avenue. The Council proceeded in this matter as outlined under the provisions of the City Ordinances, Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. G. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Sewer Cleaner. - 9 - 7/23 a. `Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 -7 -109 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of McQueen Equipment Company in the amount of $89,.898.00 is the lowest responsible bid for (1) High Pressure Sewer Cleaner /Vacum Machine and the Mayor and Clerk are authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Seconded by Counc i lmember Wa s i 1 uk . Ayes - all, Ze 4 x 4 Truck _a.. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 84 -7- 110 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet in the amount of $11,897.00 is the lowest responsible bid for (1) 6100 lb. GVW 4x4 vehicle and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Seconded by Counc i lmember Was i 1 uk . Ayes - all, 3. Street Paving Project a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Counc i lmember Ma i da introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 84 - 7 - 111 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of North- west Asphalt in the amount of $.120,560.00 is the lowest responsible bid for Maplewood Project 84 -6 and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Seconded by Counc i lmember Was i 1 uk . Ayes - all, H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS i, Conditional Use Permit:' Rolling Hills Mobile Home Park a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mr. Richard Pearson, 1959 White Bear Avenue, owner of the Park, explained the progress of the improvement to the park. He further e x p l a i n e d why all the conditions of the permit. c. The following persons expressed their views: 'Mr. Dahlberg, 1368 Rolling Hills Drive; - 10 - 7/23 E Mrs. Karen Bordson, 1323 Rolling Hills Drive; Mrs. Fran Juker, 1965 Barclay. d...Coundilmember Maida moved that no mobile homes be moved into the park for three weeks and tabled further iscussion until-August 13, 1984 meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. 2. Meeting with Developers in the "Leg" Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson, Maida and Wasiluk. Nays - Mayor Greavu. a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Council established a Developers /Council meeting at 7:00 P.M., August 15, 1984 at East County Line No. 2 Fire Station, 3. CDRB Appeal: Gulden's a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mr. Doyle Biggs, Co- owner of Gulden's, spoke on behalf of the request to appeal the Community Design Review Board's cond i °t ion regarding that all parking and drive areas be paved and have continuous concrete curbing and that there be modifications to the requirement of a holding tank being i nsta l l ed for s p r i n k l i n g purposes, c. Councilmember Anderson moved that Gulden's will have to be constructed according to the State B u i l d i n g Code. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all, d. Councilmember Anderson moved an amendment to the Community Design Review Board's condition number four regar ing a - construction of u ens to read: 4. All parking and drive areas shall be paved and striped, and shall have continuous concrete curbing, except for the existing concrete wheel stops along the Highway 61 frontage which may remain. The drive, shown as "existing gravel" on the site plan, sha l l be eliminated, Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. e. Councilmember Anderson moved to instruct staff to investigate the possibility of extending water to serve the area of eam and Highway Seconded by Councilmember W a s i l u k , Ayes - all, Councilmember Anderson moved to waive the Rules of Procedures and hear Visitor Presentations at this time. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. Bill and Jean Todd, 2500 White Bear Avenue Ayes - all, a. The Todds explained the probemes they are experiencing because of the tr i -p 1 ex that is being constructed south of their home. They stated the developer has not followed the approved elevations or conditions that were approved for that project, - 11 - 7/23 b . Council directed someone from the City Engineering Department meet with the Todds at the construction site July 24, 1984 at 11:00 A.M. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. No Parking Request - Carlton Street A. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b . Mayor Greavu i ntroduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 -7- 112 RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the West side of Carlton Street from Conway Parking" k g Avenue to 1300 feet North is designated a "No Par zone. Seconded by Councilmember Ma i da . Ayes - all, 2. Podawiltz Development Request a. Manager Evans stated Podawiltz Development Corporation has requested that Holmes and Graven be their bond counsel with respect to the application of the Revenue Bonds for Rental Housing (Mapleridge), b. .Mayor Greavu moved to deny the request and informed Podawiltz Development that Briggs and Morgan were the 1 y s on ing counsel at is time. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. McKnight and Highwood a. Councilmember Maida stated that parking on the streets at the intersection of Highwood and McKnight was a real problem. b. Councilmember Ma i da moved to refer the problem to staff to investigate. Seconded by Counci lmember Was i i uk . Ayes - all. 2. Garage Moving Ordinance a. Councilmember Anderson requested staff handle garage moving permits. b. Councilmember Anderson moved first reading of an ordinance a l l o w i n g garage moving permits to be handled administratively. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 3. Used Car "Lemon Law" a. Councilmember Anderson moved that the City Council support legislation regarding the proposed "Lemon Law" or use cars. - 12 - 7/23 Seconded by Counc i lmember Ma i da . Ayes - all, L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Resolution - St. Paul Water Department a. Counc i lmember Wa s i 1 uk introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 84 - 7 - 113 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has been attempting to negotiate a contract with the St. Paul Board of Water Commissioners regarding water service to a majority of its residents for over one and one-half years; and WHEREAS, the St. Paul Board of Water Commissioners has resolutely refused to discuss charges, but unilaterally has established a twenty percent surcharge on Maple- wood residents; and WHEREAS, the St. Paul Board of Water Commissioners has, for all practical purposes, established a monopoly on water services to Maplewood residents served by its water supplies; and WHEREAS, it is the belief of the ,City of Maplewood that the twenty percent surcharge is unjustified, and that Maplewood residents have other costs beyond the surcharge, which are paid for st . Paul residents out of their lower rates; and WHEREAS, the Cities of Mendota Heights and West St. Paul are a l s o in contract negotiations with the St. Paul Board of Water Commissioners and face the same monopo- listic situation; and WHEREAS, these cities have no course of action other than the courts to redress this matter; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Maplewood that the Metro- politan Council be hereby requested to intercede in the matter of a water contract between the City of Maplewood and the St. Paul Board of Water Commissioners in order that an equitable s o l u t i o n to a regional problem can be reached, Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. - M. ADJOURNMENT 10:05 P.M. City Clerk 13 - 7/23 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, August 1 1984 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 84 -18 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council - of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. Be ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present MaryLee Maida, Councilmember Present Michael T. Wa s i 1 uk , Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL. OF MINUTES 1. Meeting No. 84 -15 (July 9, 1984) Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 84 -15 (July 9, 1984) as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 2. Meeting No. 84 -17 (July 30, 1984) Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 84 -17 (July 30, 1984) as clihmiff PH Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - Mayor Greavu; Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Wasi luk. Councilmember Maida abstained. D.. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. Todd - White Bear Avenue 2, Driveways 3. Policies 4. Frost Avenue 5. Senior Roommate Program 6. Special Use Permits 7. Building Code 8. Joint Power Agreement - Access to 61 Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved, seconded by Councilmember Maida, Ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda, Items l th rough 9 , as r 8/13 11 1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part I, Fees, Services, Expenses - Check Register dated July 17, 1984 through August 3, 1984 - $326,588.35: Part II, Payroll Check dated July 27 1984 - $70,071.67) in the amount of $396,660.02. 2. Court Lease Authorized execution of a base agreement with Ramsey County for court space which w l l cover 1984 -1986. 3. Capital Improvement Projects to be Cancelled Approve the following projects be cancelled and the funds returned to their approp- riate P.A.C. accounts: Gladstone - Project #11 - 4720 - 337 -94 Grading $6,000 To Commercial Account Gloster - Project #11 - 4720- 313 -94 Play Equipment $7,620 To Commercial Account Goodrich - Project #11 - 4720- 316 -94 Fountain $1 To Commercial Account 4. Delinquent Developers Account Receivable ' D i s m i s s e d a claim of $834.50 against Charter Development, Inc. for the Maple Green Third Addition as recommended by the City Attorney and authorize a transfer from the General Fund to the Special Assessment Fund to eliminate the deficit for t h i s project. 5. Stipulation - Maca 1 us Appeal Reco i ut i on No. 84 -8 -116 WHEREAS, that Parcel No. is owned by Appelants above named and is described as follows: The South 253.0 feet of the East 608.4 feet of the NE 1/4, Section 4, Town- ship 29 North, Range 22 West, lying West of State Trunk Highway 61, according to the United States Government Survey thereof; WHEREAS, that Owners pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.061 and 429.081 have taken timely appeals from that special assessment for local p u b l i c improvement project No. 78 -24 for a sanitary sewer main; WHEREAS, Respondent adopted a special assessment for local public improvement project No. 78 -24 so fas as the same pertains to s a i d Parcels No. 2 in the amount of $31,229.45 on July 29, 1982; WHEREAS, the parties hereto through the undersigned, their respective attorneys of record, desire to compromise and settle these pending proceedings. - 2 - 8/13 g NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. That as to Parcel No. 2, the assessment levied by the City Council, on July 29, 1982 for 540 linear feet of sanitary sewer main at $56.95 was $30,753.00 and one service connection of $476.45 for a total assessment of $31,229.45, be, and hereby is, reduced to $15,100.00. 2* That the effective date of the reduction shall be July 29, 1982 and that the payment of the first installment of the reduced assessment, including p r i n c i p a l and interest running from said July 2.9, 198.2 shall not be payable until calendar year 1984 and thereafter, until the entire p r i n c i p a l balance due thereunder, together with interest as originally determined, shall be paid over the number of years as originally set forth by said City, July 29, 1982, 3. That the Owners, through the undersigned, their attorney, hereby waive any and all right of further notice and appeal as provided for in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 as amended. 4. That the above proposed reduced assessment is accepted by the City, through the undersigned, its attorney, and shall constitute the special assessment for local p u b l i c improvements against said Parcel No. 2 and that said Parcel No. 2 is hereby found to benefit by said local public improvements in the amount of the reduced assess- ment levied therefor . 5, That the terms and provisions of Maplewood City Council Resolutions adopting the original assessment role insofar as they are not otherwise inconsistent herewith, are incorporated herein by reference. 6. That the Maplewood City Clerk shall, upon appropriate City Council action, forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of the reduced assessment as determined hereunder to the Ramsey County Auditor to be extended on the property tax list of said County and said assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other m u n i c i p a l taxes save and except that the Owner shall not be liable for p e n - a l t i e s and interest on penalties through and including the date hereof, 7. The above-entitled action having been hereby fully compromised and settled, is stipulated and agreed that the same may be, and hereby is, dismissed on its mert i s with prejudice and the Clerk of said above named District Court, upon filing of t h i s S t i p u l a t i o n , is hereby authorized and directed to dismiss said action of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals all as of the day and year first above written. 6 . F i n a l Payment Project 83 -12 Signal Installation Resolution No. 84 -8 -117 WHEREAS, the contractor has completed all work according to the plans and speci- fication for Project 83 -12, Traffic Signal at T.H. 49 and County Road B; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that f i n a l payment in the amount of $20,291.18 be made to Peoples E l e c t r i c Company. 7. Budget Transfer - Beebe Station Resolution No. 84 -8 -118 - 3 - 8/13 RESOLVED that a transfer from the Hydrant Contingency Fund to the Water System Operation Fund be made in the amount of $2,300.00. 8. Final Plat: Tous l ey Commercial Park Approved the Tous 1 ey Commercial Park F i n a l P l a t as submitted. 9. Final Plat : Cave's 4th Addition Approved the Cave's Century 4th Addition Final Plat as submitted. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7 :00 P.M. - Plat /Variances - Tilsen's Maplewood Heights No. 13 a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding approval -of a preliminary p l a t and lot area and width variances to create six single d w e l l i n g lots. b. Director of Community Development Geoff Olson presented the staff report. c. Commissioner David Whitcomb presented the following Planning Commission report: "Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend the City Council adopt the following resolution: WHEREAS, Ti lsen Homes, Inc. applied for a variance for the following described property: East 150 feet of the West 262.60 feet of the South 297.45 feet of the North 330.45 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 1, Township 2.9, Range 22, subject to an easement for highway purposes over the southerly 3.5 feet thereof. Together with, The West 112.60 feet of the South 297.45 feet of the North 330.45 feet of the Northwest 112 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 1, Township 29, Range 22, West, subject to McKnight Road and Gall Avenue rights -of -way. This property is also known as 2266 and 2280 E. County Road D. Maplewood; WHEREAS, Sections 26 -69 and 30 -8 (f) (1) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires single dwelling lots to have at least 10,000 square feet of area; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing lot four with 9, 520 square feet, lot five with 9, 085 square feet and lot six with 8,960 square feet of Robert T i 1 sen' s Maplewood Heights #13, requiring variances of 480,915 and 1,040 square feet, respectively; WHEREAS, sections 36 -69 and 30 -8 (f) (1) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires interior single dwelling lots to have at least 75 feet of width; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing lots five and six of Robert T i 1 sen' s Maplewood Heights #13 with 70 feet of width, each requiring a variance of five feet; - 4 - 8/13 WHEREAS, Section 30 -8 (f) (2) of City Code requires single dwelling corner lots to be at least 100 feet wide; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing lot four of Robert T i 1 sen' s Maplewood Heights #13 to be 79.6 feet wide, requiring a variance of 21.4 feet; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as f o l l o w s : 1. This variance was applied for on June 13, 1984. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood P l a n n i n g Commission on August 6, 1984. The P l a n n i n g Commission recommended to the City Council that s i ad var- iance be denied. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the above described variance be denied on the basis of the following findings I f fact: 1. Strict enforcement of the code would not cause an undue hardship because of circumstances unique to this property. 2. The property can be developed with five lots meeting code. 3. An undesirable precedent would be set. 4. The variances do not meet the spirit and intent of the code. 5. Lots four through six would be out of character with the lots to the south. Plan. 6. The density would exceed the maximum density allowed by the Land Use The P l a n n i n g Commission a l s o recommends to the City Council approval of a Pre - liminary Plat for five lots as shown on page 10 of the staff memorandum subject to the following conditions: 1. Submission of a s i gned developer's agreement and required surety for the extension of water along County Road D to the east l i n e of the p 1 at, . from McKnight Road (required by code) . 2. The right of .way for Gall Avenue shall be 60 feet wide, as measured from the South l i n e of Gall Avenue right of way established by Robert T i l sen' s Maplewood Heights No. 10. It is proposed as 59.4 feet as measured from the Tilsen's 10th Addition. 3. Dedication of an a d d i t i o n a l ten feet along the west boundary of the site for McKnight Road right of way. Commissioner Pe l l i sh seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdah 1, Barrett, Fischer, Larson, Pel l ish, Robens. Abstained - Commissioner Whitcomb." d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents and opponents. The following voiced their opinions: Mr. Kurt Kramer, 2266 E. County Road D; Mr. James Tilsen, the applicant; Mr. Charles Mech 1 enberg, 3095 McKnight; - 5 - 8/13 Mr. Jerry Mogren, 2869 Frederick; Mr. Dean DeMars, 2280 Gall; Mr. Joe Bakeman, 2272 Gall. A petition signed by the area residents was presented approving the preliminary p l a t and variances. e. Mayor Greavu closed the p u b l i c hearing. f. Counc i 1 member Bastian moved to approve the concept of the preliminary plat and variances and direct s a o prepare the necessary resolution. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 2. .7:10 P.M. Rezoning - Farrell Street Niezgocki (4 votes) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposed rezoning of Lot 9, Block 3, Farrell ' s Addition from R -1 to R-2. b. Director of Community Development Geoff Olson presented the staff report. c. Commissioner David Whitcomb presented the following P l a n n i n g Commission report: "Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt the following resolution: WHEREAS, Russell Niezgocki initiated a rezoning from R -1, single dwelling to R -2, double dwelling for the following described property: Lot 9, Block 3, Farrell's Addition WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by Russell Niezgocki, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood P l a n n i n g Commission on August 6, 1984. The P l a n n i n g Commission recommended to the City Council that said re- zoning be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the above described rezoning be approved on the basis of the f o l l o w i n g findings of fact : 1. The proposed. change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or p l a n is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as -6 - 8/13 p u b l i c water, sewers, p o l i c e and fire protection and schools. Commissioner Robens seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Barrett, Fischer, Larson, Pel l ish, Robens, Whitcomb. Nays Commissioner Axdah 1. " do Mr, Russell N i ezgock i , the applicant, spoke on behalf of the request. He stated he would be living i n one h a l f of the double d w e l l i n g . e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents and opponents. The following voiced their opinions: Mr. Dick Radman, 2674 Margaret. f. Mayor Greavu closed the* public hearing. g. Counci lmember Maida introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: WHEREAS, Russell N i ezgock i initiated a rezoning from R l, single dwelling to R2, double dwelling for the following described property: Lot 9. Block 3. Farrel 1 ' s Addition WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by Russell N iezgock i , pursuant to chapter 36, article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on August 6, 1984. The P l a n n i n g Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezon- ing be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on August 13, 1984. to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and m a i l e d pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as p u b l i c water, sewers, p o l i c e and fire protection and schools, - 7 - 8/13 Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 3:. 7 :20 P.M. - Variances - 1890 Furness Street - Johnson a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Mr. Daniel Johnson, 1890 Furness Street for approval of a lot width variance to subdivide a 140 foot wide lot into two 70 foot wide single dwelling lots. b. Director of Community Development Geoff Olson presented the staff report. c. Commissioner David Whitcomb presented the following Planning Commission re- commendation: " Commissioner Pe 1 i i sh moved the P l a n n i n g Commission recommend that the City Council adopt the following resolution: WHEREAS; Daniel -Johnson applied for a variance for.- described property: Lot 15, Block 4, Hillcrest Gardens, Section 14, Township 29, Range 22. This property is also known as 1890 Furness Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, sections 30 -81 (f) (1) and 36 -69 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires interior single dwelling lots to be at least 75 feet wide; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing two lots with seventy feet of width, ..each requiring a variance of five feet; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as f o l l o w s : 1. This variance was applied for on July 5, 19840 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on August 6, 1984. The P l a n n i n g Commission recommended to the City Council that s i ad var- iance be denied, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the above described variance be denied on the basis that the variance: 1. Would not cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the i n d i v i d u a l property under consideration. 2. Would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Commissioner Whitcomb seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Fischer, Larson, Pellish, Robens, Whitcomb." d. Mr. Daniel Johnson, 1890 Furness Street, the applicant, spoke on behalf of the proposal. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents or opponents. The following voiced their opinions: Mr. Robert Lundquist, 1895 Howard Street. f. Mayor Greavu closed the p u b l i c hearing. - 8 - 8/13 g. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 84 -8- 119 WHEREAS, Daniel Johnson applied for a variance for the following described property: Lot 15, Block 4, Hillcrest Gardens, Section 14, Township 29, Range 22 T h i s property is a l s o known as 1890 Furness Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, SECTIONS 30 -81 (f) (1) and 36 -69 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires interior single dwelling lots to be at least 75 feet wide; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing two lots with seventy feet of width, each requiring a variance of five-feet; WHEREAS, the procedural history of t h i s variance is as f o l l o w s : 1. This variance was applied for on July 5, 1984. 2. T h i s variance was reviewed by the Maplewood P l a n n i n g Commission on August b, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said var - iance be denied. 3 . The Maplewood City Counc i t h e l d a p u b l i c hearing on August 13, 1984 to consider this variance. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and P l a n n i n g Commission* NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MPALEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above described variance be denied on the basis that the variance: 1. Would not cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. 2. Would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Wasiluk. Nays - Councilmember Maida, 4. 7:30 P.M. Garage Moving - 1747 City Heights Drive a. Councilmember Bastian moved to continue the hearino. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - a11. G. AWARD OF BIDS None . H. 'UNFIN BUSINES - 9 - 8/13 A 1 . M c C l e l l a n d Street Water a. Acting Manager Haider presented the staff report. b. Counci lmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 -8- 120 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the City Council on July 30, 1984 plans and specifications for McClelland Street Water Main, Project No. 84 -4, have been prepared under the direction of the City Engineer, who has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in t'he office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertise- ment shall be published twice, at least three weeks before date set for bid open- ing, shall specif the work to be done, shall state that bids w i l l be p u b l i c l y opened and considered by the Council at 10 A.M. on the seventh day of September, 1984, at the City Hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota for 5/ of the amount of such bid. 3. The City Clerk and City Engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. The Council will consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at the regular City Council meeting of September 10, 1984. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 2. Water - Beam Avenue - West of Highway 61 a. Acting Manager Haider presented the staff report and the details of the pro- posal. b. Mr. Jerry Mogren , owner of property in the area to be served, spoke on behalf of the proposal. c. Counci lmember Anderson moved that the City Engineer is directed to investi- gate the scope of study and feasibility study cos or extending water to e area west of north o ea Avenue. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 3 . Conditional Use Permit - Rolling Hills M o b i l e Home Park a. Acting Manager Haider presented the staff report. b. Mr. Dick Pearson, 1959 White Bear Avenue, explained the progress that has been made at the Mobile Home Park. - 101- 8/13 c . Counci lmember Bastian moved to grant a 60 day extension for the Rolling Hills Mobile Home Park to complet th e laying of sod and necessary see 1ng. Seconded by Counci lmember Wa s i 1 uk . Ayes - all. d. Councilmember Anderson roved to leave the berm as it is presently. Seconded by Counci lmember Wa s i. l uk . Ayes - all. e. Counci lmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 -8- 121 WHEREAS, the City initiated an amendment endment to a c o n d i t i o n a l use permit for a mobile hone park at the f o l l o w i n g described property: The Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 24, Township 24, Range 22 WHEREAS, the procedural history of this c o n d i t i o n a l use permit is as f o l l o w s : 1 . The o r i g i n a l c o n d i t i o n a l use permit was approved by the Maplewood City Council on October 25, 1982 and revised on Apri 24 and Ju 9, 19840 2. The Maplewood City Counci continued the hearing h e l d on Ju 9, 1984 to consider further amending or revoking the c o n d i t i o n a l use permit. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendat ions of the City Staff. Counci amended conditions nine and 24. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEW00D CITY COUNCIL that the above described c o n d i t i o n a l use permit be amended to read as f o l l o w s : 1. P rior to the spring thaw and until July 1, 1984, improved (gravel or similar material) off street parking pads shall be provided for each vehicle associated with an occupied unit. Unrestricted emergency vehicle access must be available at all times. 2. A : m o b i l e home shall not be moved onto a lot after April 23, 1984 un � i 1 a street is paved in front of the lot. 3. There shall be no exterior storage of equipment, such as bikes, hoses, lawnmowers, rakes, etc. 4. Each lot shall be allowed an exterior storage shed of no more than 120 square feet. Such shed must be kept in workmanlike repair and painted. 5. No access shall be allowed to Century Avenue. 6. No construction or grading shall be allowed to disturb the tamarack grove. 7. The private sanitary sewer, water mains and street shall be constructed to be consistent with the Maplewood and St. Paul Water Utility standards to ensure a reasonable level of service. 11 - 8/13 8. All utility i n s t a l l a t i o n s shall be underground. 9. The private streets must be at least 28 feet in width, with parking on one side only. No parking shall be permitted in the vicinity of intersections. The Director of Public Safety shall specify .the no parking di stances . for each intersection. Signs shall be posted by the park owner when, available. 10. Water lines must be flushed at least once each year or as required by the environmental health o f f i c i a l . 11. All storm water discharge must be directed to the wetland to the west. No connection to the City storm sewer shall be allowed. 12. All mobile homes must be new, skirted and tied down. Skirting shall extend from the frame of the chassis to the ground. Skirting must be painted to complement the mobile home. 13. All tie -downs and foundations must meet the State B u i l d i n g Code. 14. (a) Construction on the below-grade storm shelter shall begin May 11, 1984 and shall be completed by dune 22, 1984, unless the Director of Pub ,l is Safety extends the deadline due to circumstances beyond the control of the deve l - oper. (b) The design of the below grade structure rust be approved by the Director of Emergency Services, i n c l u d i n g emergency l i g h t i n g , v e n t i l a t i o n and sanitary facilities. (c) The above grade portion of the building must receive approval from the Design Review Board before construction. (d) The storm shelter must remain free of storage and available for use. (e) No further permits for additional mobile homes shall be issued until the shelter is completed. 15. The sign regulations for the R -3 district shall apply. 16. The following minimum setbacks shall apply. (1) Twenty feet to a private street. (2) Thirty feet to a public right of way, except for storage sheds. (3) Five foot side yard setback on the side opposite the entry. (4) Twenty foot side yard setback on the entry side. 17. No structures shall be allowed in a required setback, except for an accessory b u i l d i n g in the twenty foot side yard setback and the thirty foot set - back from a p u b l i c right of way. An accessory b u i l d i n g must have a side yard setback of at least five feet. 18. Sales of mobile homes shall be limited to those owned by park residents and those sold by the park owner for placement in the park. 19. The developer shall provide traffic control signs as required by the Director of Public Safety. 12 - 8/13 20. Compliance with all pertinent State Statutes and /or regulations. 21. No variation shall be permitted from-the site p 1 an dated 3 -21 -83 without Community Design Review Board approval, 22. The number of m o b i l e homes shall not exceed 246. 23. T h i s c o n d i t i o n a l us-e permit s h a l l be reviewed in one year to determine compliance with conditions and whether a change in conditions is necessary to resolve problems that may have developed. 24. (a) After April 23, 1984, the following improvements must be installed within sixty days after a mobile home is placed on a lot: (1) A paved driveway and off street parking pad at least sixteen feet wide and twenty feet deep. (2) A thirty inch wide sidewalk from the mobile home entrance to the parking pad subject to placement of entrance decks. (3) All required landscaping on the lot. If the landscaping cannot be completed within sixty days, a letter of credit or cash escrow shall be deposited with the Director of Community Development to ensure installation. (4) Skirting. (b) Improvements required in item 24 (a) shall not apply to model homes. 25. If any of the above conditions are not met, no additional mobile homes shall be moved into the park. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 4. Code Amendment - Garage Moving (2nd Reading) a. Acting Manager Haider presented the staff report. b. Mayor Greavu introduced the f o l l o w i n g ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 569 AN ORDINANCE ALLOWING STAFF APPROVAL FOR GARAGE RELOCATIONS THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Article I V of the Maplewood Code is hereby amended to read as follows: BUILDING RELOCATION Section 9.61, PERMIT REQUIRED TO MOVE BUILDING. No person shall move a house or garage over any highway, street or alley in Maplewood, without first receiving approval from the City. - Section 9.62. APPLICATION. An applicant s h a l l submit a b u i l d i n g relocation application form and the following materials: 1. A certified abstracter's list, listing all property owners and their - 13 - 8/13 mailing addresses within 350 feet of the property to wh i ch a house is to be moved. Garage relocations shall be exempt from this requirement, 2. A legal description of the property to which the building is to be moved. 3, Photographs showing a l l four sides of the b u i l d i n g and a dimensioned site plan showing the proposed placement of the structure on the new site. 4. An application fee to be set by City Council resolution. 5. A cash escrow deposit of $100.00, which shall be used for defraying costs incurred by the City in inspecting the building and property, if located outside of Maplewood. The Inspectors, and any other officials whose inspection is required, shall inspect the building and be reimbursed at a rate of $15.00 for each house involved i n making their inspection. If any of the escrow payment required is not used, the amount remaining shall be returned to the applicant. Section 9.623. PLAN REVIEW AUTHORITY. All applications for house relocations shall be subject to the approval of the City Council. Garage relocations may be approved the the Director of Community Development. The Council shall hold a p u b l i c hearing on any application for house relocation, after notice of such hearing has been published in the official newspaper at least ten days before the hearing. Notices shall a l s o be m a i l e d to each of the owners of property within 350 feet of the property for which the house relocation is petitioned, such notices shall be mailed at least ten days before the hearing. Section 9.64. SUBMITTAL EVALUATION. 1 . The following findings must be made to approve a b u i l d i n g relocation request: a. The proposed building(s) is compatible with those in the neighborhood it would be moved A determination of c o m p a t i b i l i t y may be based on comparing the structure's exterior siding, height, mass, age and style of construction to the average home in the neighborhood to which the house is to be moved and the health, safety and welfare of the community. b. That all City Code requirements can be met. c. That water run off from the site will not cause an adverse effect on surrounding properties. d. Public streets can be protected from damage. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage and publication. Seconded by Counciimember Wasiluk. Ayes - a11. 5. Code Amendment - Cul -de -Sac Diameter (2nd Reading) a. Acting Manager Haider presented the staff report. b. Counc i lmember Wa s i 1 uk introduced the following ordinance and moved its adopti 14 - 8/13 I : 'y ORDINANCE NO. 570 AN Ordinance Regulating the Radius of Cul -de -Sac Streets THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 30- 8(b)(3) the Maplewood Code of Ordinances is hereby amended as follows: (3) Cul -de -sacs. Cul -de -sacs, when used, shall be held to as short a distance as possible between the origin or main street and the end of the cul-de- sacs. In no case shall du 1 -de -sacs exceed one thousand (1,000) feet in length, unless no other alternative is possible. Each cul -de -sac shall have a terminus of nearly circular shape with a minimum right of way diameter of one hundred twenty (120) feet. Sect i o.n 2. T h i s ordinance shal take effect upon its passage and publication. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes — Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Maida and Wasiluk. Nays - Councilmember Bastian. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Purchase of Computer a. Director of Finance Dan Faust presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved that Council authorize the following A. Termination of membership in LOGIS B. An agreement with Tele - Termina Inc. for the purchase of computer hardware and software under existing State contracts. C. Appropriate 1984 and 1985 Budget adjustments to finance the computer systern expansion as outlined i n. th i s report. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 2. Sewer Agreement a. Acting Manager Haider presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its � ^V%4. • 84 -8- 122 RESOLVED that the Joint Use Lift Station Agreement with the City of St. Paul as amended is approved. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 3. Part Time Building Official a. Director of Community Development Geoff Olson presented the staff report. - 15 - 8/13 b. Counc i lmember Bastian moved to approve the hiring of a part time b u i l d i n g inspector as a consultant for a 3 month r i a 1 period and authorize the transfer of$3,,085 from the.contingency account, Seconded by Counc i lmember Was i 1 uk . .Ayes - all. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Joint Powers Agreement - Access to 61 a. Acting Manager Haider presented the staff report. b. Counc i lmember Wa s i 1 uk introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption : 84 -8- 123 RESOLVED that the Staff is authorized to complete f i n a l wording of the Joint Powers Agreement between Maplewood MnDOT and Hess Kline and Jean Parranto for access to T.H. 61 and execute said agreement as soon as practible. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. jo VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Todd — White Bear Avenue a. Counc i lmember Wa s i 1 uk wished to inform the Council regarding the continuing problems with the newly constructed tri -plex. b. Acting Manager Haider explained that the contractor had not followed approved plans. b. Mrs. Jean Todd, 2800 White Bear Avenue, lives next door to the development and again stated the many problems that are there. d. Counc i lmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 84 -8- 124 WHEREAS, a series of homes was constructed at 2792, 2794 and 2796 White Bear Avenue in non - compliance with the approved grading plan; WHEREAS, the developer subsequently built a retaining w a l l without City inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that as an additional condition for issuance of an occupancy permit the developer shall: 1) Submit a certification from a registered engineer that the retaining wall is built to an accepted engineering standard. 2) Submit a certification from a registered engineer that the drainage - 16 - 8/13 from the property will not Seconded by Councilmember wasiluk. e. Councilmember Maida moved that be taken in regards to the Don John Seconded by Councilmember Bastian, 2. Driveways advers ly affect adjoining property.. Ayes. - all* staff investigate what possible action can property. Ayes - all. a. Councilmember Ma i da requested staff investigate p o s s i b l e regulations pertain- ing to abutting driveways and retaining walls. b. Referred to Staff for investigation. 3. Council Policies a. Councilmember Anderson commented on Council Policies and how they could be inforced. 4. Frost Avenue a. Councilmember Anderson questioned what is happening to the p l a n s for construction of Frost Avenue. b. Staff stated plans were still at the County. 6. Senior Roommate Program a. Councilmember Bastian requested the City's housing authority investigate the proposed senior- roommate program. 6. Special Use Permits a. Councilmember Bastian commented on liquidated damages concept regarding special use permits. He requested that something be drawn up as an ordinance and returned to the Council, 7. B u i l d i n g Codes Not discussed. M. ADJOURNMENT 10:52 P.M. City Clerk - 17 - 8/13 a MANUAL CHECKS PAGE 1 1984 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDO? ITEM DESCRIPTION 214830 )8/15 /84 236.11 BLUE CROSS A/R INS 21483.] u8/15/84 559.14 BLUE CROS3, P/R DEDUCTION 214830 -6/15/84 39647.39 BLUE CROSS HEALTH INS a 4,442.6► 214K20 C' 8/15 /84 1 45.00 KANE ROSEMARY P/R DEDUCTION 145.)U 214M61 /15 /84 216.27 MN MUTUAL LIFE HEALTH INS L1 4M61 2. 3/15 /84 35.36 MN MUTUAL LIFE P/R DEDUCT 2141061 78/15/84 34.Q6 MN MUTUAL LIFE P/R DEDUCT 214M61 ,o/15/84 29256954 MCI MUTUAL LIFE P/R DEDUCT 21 41061 !P/15/1 34 * 96 MN MUTUAL LIFE P/R DEDUCT 214M61:/15/84 34.06- MN MUTUAL LIFE P/R DEDUCT f 214M61 8/15/84 7,511,:13 MN MUTUAL LIFE HEALTH 'NS i 10, 054.16 t I , i 214M69 C 15 /84 10 9 529.60 MN ST TREaS +QTR VEH POL 214M69 - OR/15/84 401.0? MN ST TREAS ORIVERS LIC POL 109930.60 t 215C4u ES /15!84 111050 CLERK OF 7IST CT DaV LTC FBL 111.50 PAGE 2 AMOUNT 69358875 1 88. 0 6 +� 11COJ.':J 5.132.49 299. 5,431.49 f 6.653.0 421 .Ja 7 7 9 836,42 406.00 8 3.40 3.40 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPT70N MN ST TREAS MTR VEH POL MN ST TREAS DRIVERS L PBL EMPLIYEE BENEFIT MN ST TREAS MN ST TREAS MN ST TREAS MN ST TREAS MN ST TREA MN ST TREAS METTLER DANIEL Or - P OSIT PBL MTR VEH PBL DRIVERS LIC PAL MTR VEH P 8L OR LIC PBL MTR Y :H ?BL DR LIC PBL REFUND INS t' 1984 CITY OF MAPL =WOOD { - CHECK N 0. DATE 215M69 �a/15f84 215M69 ^8/15/84 L 216E64 0 4 1 t t 216M69 its /15/84 21 6x69 3/15 84 2191069 /15/84 2191 Cb/15/84 22L M69 ::x/15/84 2200 18/15/84 221 P46 8 /15 /84 AMOUNT 69358875 1 88. 0 6 +� 11COJ.':J 5.132.49 299. 5,431.49 f 6.653.0 421 .Ja 7 7 9 836,42 406.00 8 3.40 3.40 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPT70N MN ST TREAS MTR VEH POL MN ST TREAS DRIVERS L PBL EMPLIYEE BENEFIT MN ST TREAS MN ST TREAS MN ST TREAS MN ST TREAS MN ST TREA MN ST TREAS METTLER DANIEL Or - P OSIT PBL MTR VEH PBL DRIVERS LIC PAL MTR VEH P 8L OR LIC PBL MTR Y :H ?BL DR LIC PBL REFUND INS f PAGE 3 1984 CITY OF MAPLEWCOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK N0• DATE AMOUNT _ VE NDCR ITEM DESCRIPTION 221 M69 06/15 5 MN ST TREAS. MTR VEH P8L ' 221M69 08/15/84 289,0 NN ST TREAS. DRV LIC PBL 59961.74 : At 221M76 08/15/84 6 MN ST TREAS P/R DEDUCT I 221M76 08/15/84 R 9621 .n 1 MM ST TREAS P =RA BENEFIT f." 15 * 221M9.5 " ;,8/15/84 170. 1MRPA c "ITRY FEES 170. 222C40 '�6 /15 /84 1 11.50 CLERK OF DIST CT DRV LIC PBL 111.50 222E64 08/15/84 1 ^Of- 0 EMPLOYEE 3`t NEFIT DEPOSIT P9L 222 !1 3 1 /15 /84 5 MAPLELEAF OFL� FEES 5 073.00 122"20 33/15/84 1199576. 7 3 M TRO WASTE AUGePAYMT AMOUNT 1199576.73 35,883.1 4 5 9 775.8 5 14',::0 41 p793 t 60.00 60. ^0 451,!0 451 63 a t 102,44G,73 1199576,73 19 779,43 2,joo, ^0 2 43 r 796.89 PAGE 4 CHECK REGISTER VE NO OR ITEM DESCRIPTT ON A MN ST TR =AS MTR VEH PBL MAI ST TREAS MTR VEH PLB MN ST TREAS DP LTC PBL NATL REGISTRY REGIST M* ST TREAS ORV LIC ?'BL FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL 1984 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD TOTAL SANITARY SEWER FU40 FUND 92 CHECK N0. DATE NFU *1D 94 TOTAL DEN TAL SELF- INSURANCE T CTA L 222M69 1:;8/15/84 22210,69 :N /15 84 222M59 0/15/84 222N'_'5 28/15/P4 223M69 x°/15/84 ft * * * C cl L AMOUNT 1199576.73 35,883.1 4 5 9 775.8 5 14',::0 41 p793 t 60.00 60. ^0 451,!0 451 63 a t 102,44G,73 1199576,73 19 779,43 2,joo, ^0 2 43 r 796.89 PAGE 4 CHECK REGISTER VE NO OR ITEM DESCRIPTT ON A MN ST TR =AS MTR VEH PBL MAI ST TREAS MTR VEH PLB MN ST TREAS DP LTC PBL NATL REGISTRY REGIST M* ST TREAS ORV LIC ?'BL FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 90 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER FU40 FUND 92 TOTAL PAYROLL BENEFIT FJND NFU *1D 94 TOTAL DEN TAL SELF- INSURANCE T CTA L L i s 1 CITY OF MAPL6 a CHECK NC. DATE 545 *00 - 240JJ4 08/16/84 '! 240004 8/16/F4 t 240nr'4 L8/16/84 Fi 240OU ^?/16 /84 €] 2400 #44 C8/16184 45.00 240 Qt: 4 t8/16/84 45900 240LC4 J8/16/84 40.00 249004 ,; 6 116 1 F 4 514.00 24JL��4 x/16/84 1 24 0 J^ 4 w 6/ 16 I F 4 120o0C 240C.j4 Sob 16I8A 659x0 240.'..4 1:8/16!84 �a �i 240;18 68/16/P4 •• 13.33 MILLERS FAMILY MEAT SUPPLIES `? 14:135 /84 E{ 240135 X2/16/84 9.43 .240135 CQl/16/F4 110 240135 L6/16/ 18.0'4 240135 v�A/16/84 r; 240135 /'16 / 84 4.73 24J135 -6/16/R4 t i 240135 ;;b/ 16184 x r ;I 4� �i 240135 ;:8/16/p4 c:l 140168 :3/16184 r 2401 ' 7 L8/16/p4 24U187 ;8/16/84 Y e4 19 .,0/16/84 4 ' a .' 24L265 .8/16/84 24U265 %- */16/84 140265 wb/16/84 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AUGUST 27 PAGE 1 27 . C' a 27.00 : 51.42 51..5 102.47 ADVANCED PAGING SERV AUG RENTAL MN TORO IVC MN TORO IN PARTS PARTS T CO LS 79.75 RUFFR IDGE JOHNS ON 79.75 * 35.96 JOHNS )N TERESA 1. °74 JOHNSON TERESA %34• - ___.. ____.w,_ JOHNSLIt..TERESA 35.96 MILEAGE MILEAGE REFUND CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT ___ .VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 545 *00 - HEALTH RESOURCES SERVICES 15900 HEALTH RESOURCES SERVICES 10.00 NE'ALTH RESOURCES SERVICES 6900 HEALTH RESOURCES SERVICES 45.30- HEALTH RESOURCES SERVICES 45.00 HEALTH RESOURCES SER VICES 45900 HEALTH RESOURCES SERVICES 40.00 ttEALTH RESOURCES SERVICES 514.00 NCALTH RESOURCES SERVICES 275030 "EALTH RESOURCES SERVICES 120o0C HEALTH RESOURCES SERVICES 659x0 HEALTH RESOURCES SERVICES 545.00 +� 44.95 MILLERS UNIFORMS 44.95 13.33 MILLERS FAMILY MEAT SUPPLIES 4.25 MILLERS FAMILY MEAT SUPPLIES 2�.1� MILLERS FAMILY MEAT SUPPLIES 9.43 MILLERS FAMILY PEAT SUPPLIES 110 MILLERS FA MIL Y HEAT SUPPLIES 18.0'4 MILLERS F&,MILY MEAT SUPPLIES 53.36 MT LLERS FAMILY !SE SUPPLIES 4.73 MILLERS FAMILY MEAT SUPPLIES 19022 MILLERS FAMILY MEAT SUPPLIES 162.48 27 . C' a 27.00 : 51.42 51..5 102.47 ADVANCED PAGING SERV AUG RENTAL MN TORO IVC MN TORO IN PARTS PARTS T CO LS 79.75 RUFFR IDGE JOHNS ON 79.75 * 35.96 JOHNS )N TERESA 1. °74 JOHNSON TERESA %34• - ___.. ____.w,_ JOHNSLIt..TERESA 35.96 MILEAGE MILEAGE REFUND ri l 4 . CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT 1984 CITY JF MAPLE6000 ITEM DESCRIPTION t 92.70 NORTHWEST FABRICS r' CHECK NC. DATE }I � 15.59 SHERWTN WTLLIAMS F- 240271 « uR /1b /p4 3604 SPANIY9. AU£R KATHLEEN MILEAGE 36 *14 * 1 240274 U6/16/84 fi 240275 8 /16 /8 T f, z 240276 G8/16/44 i 3.100.'x' 240314 08/16/84 PARTS e4U 315 l 9.29 SPANNSAUER MARTIN MILEAGE 240334 ;3/16/84 } 10.92 LECLAIR MARY - 14U339 UR116, /84 24034; . • 240341 �'8 /1blp4 240342 /16184 SUPPLIES 24CJ43 '8/16/p4 2 -#e 344 'R /16/84 SUPPLIES 240345 x,8/16/84 240346 L8 /1C /A4 SUPPLIES 240347 08/16/84 10050 NATL WILDLIFE FED PAGE 2 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT __. YcNDCR ITEM DESCRIPTION t 92.70 NORTHWEST FABRICS SUPPLIES 92. 15.59 SHERWTN WTLLIAMS SUPPLIES 15.59 * 3604 SPANIY9. AU£R KATHLEEN MILEAGE 36 *14 * 1 4.13 STIRZL JENNIFER MILEAGE 4.13 1 3 DOo t- EKBLAO PAR,DEE INSURANCE 3.100.'x' 42.34 G T PARTS CO PARTS 42.34 9.29 SPANNSAUER MARTIN MILEAGE 9.29 10.92 LECLAIR MARY MILEAGE 10.92 790 * C 8 MIDWEST FENCE b MFG SUPPLIES 79�. ^8 55 *35 MIDWEST W +RE i STEEL SUPPLIES 55.35 86.24 MOCERW RESEARCH CORP SUPPLIES 86.24 20 *00 MOCRELANE INC SUPPLIES 20 0 10050 NATL WILDLIFE FED McMBERStHIP 10.50 * 27.46 NATURE SHOP SUPPLIES 27.46 * 12900 PADDOCK C A R CLE REFUND 12 *0C 15.45 PAPAS POPCORN SUPPLIES j G� CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT t; ITEM DESCRIPTION 15.45 +� 12•00 1984 CITY OF MAPL 60 REFUND 12.00 # CHECK NO* a:,TE ir RAMCO PR IIITI NG SUPPLIES 24034. . ?_/16/�4 ir 1 ?. •f'r! 1SCHI OA SANDY 140349 :%w �s/16/Q4 c = 24035, :6 /16184 - r 30 000 240351 0811618 140352 jo/16184 8 ,e-4U352 ART MrCN SERV PARTS 243.50 : _ 240354 - o/16/84 _ 24CS55 ^8/16/84 94.14 240356 J8/16I84 240357 CR /16/84 CHAPIN PUBLISHING 140358 °:,/16/8A 240359 ,8/16/84 2.60 nnUGHTY LINDA MILEAGE 240361 C = ;/16/84 770?0 240361 8/16/84 77.70 24J362 •• . x/16 1A4 FORUM INSURANCE FEE 133 DO 24G3 63 x:;8/16/84 t GC^DYEAR AUTO SERV SUPPLIES 79.78 t 474085 24JAG1 ;,S/16/84 474.85 24UAu2 Oz3 /16 /E4 PAGE 3 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 15.45 +� 12•00 PATEL KALYANJI REFUND 12.00 # 6 000 RAMCO PR IIITI NG SUPPLIES 1 ?. •f'r! 1SCHI OA SANDY oEFUNO 12. 30 300100 WESTERN 10 PRODUCTS BOOKS 30 000 154.45 AR I MEGH SERV REPAIRS 8 ART MrCN SERV PARTS 243.50 : 94014 CARLSON EQUI"MT PARTS 94.14 � 39.16 CHAPIN PUBLISHING PUBLISHING 3 2.60 nnUGHTY LINDA MILEAGE 2.60 770?0 CULU LIGHTHCUSE SUPPLIES 77.70 133.00 FORUM INSURANCE FEE 133 DO 79.78 GC^DYEAR AUTO SERV SUPPLIES 79.78 474085 GOP)-ER ELECTRONICS SERVICES 474.85 2100 ^4 GUARANTEED CLEAN MT SERVICES 210. l.,34 HEIMERL CAROL MILEAGE 1.04 �► 100.00 KIVAP ICK CLEMENCE REFUND 100.00 4.65 -ACE HOM SUPPLIES 4.65 95.86 ACROm MINk SUPPLIES PAGE 4 1984 CITY OF MAPLEWCOO CHECK REGISTER CHECK NC. DATE AMOUNT _ VENDCR ITEM DESCRIPTION 240AC. 2 C'S /16 /P4 41.40 ACROmmrN& SUPPLIES 137.2 6 # 24UA4.q wb/16/84 41 * 08 AMER TOOL SUPPLY TOOLS 41.08 # 249469 L? /15/84 20.Cd0 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIRS 24UA69 ib/17/84 .40 ARI►ALS AUTO SERV REPAIRS 240A69 ;;► i/16/A4 116 *65 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIRS 240A69b/16/84 21.75 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIRS 240A6 9 ::8/15/84 210.50 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIRS 240x69 :.8/16/84 149.80 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIRS 240A69 od /10/84 64.15- ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIRS 24GA69 '28/16/84 108.25 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIRS 24CA69 U8/16/84 64.15 ARNALS ALTO SERV REPAIRS 24UA69 ,;6/16/84 64.15 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIRS 591.50 24UP13 L.a/16/84 2 BAHT J% ;MES C INSPECTION FEES 2.2 32.5G f 24JE15 ,:6/16184 157.60 BATTERY TIRE WHSE SUPPLIES + 157.60 240P45 L6/16/Q4 37016 ECARD OF WATER COMM ENG FEES - 24C E45 X8/16 /84 17.3 3 BOARD OF WATER COMM ENG FEES - 240845 - -8/16/84 322.30 BOARD OF MATER COMM ENG FEES 240 e45 :.8/16 /84 33.90 BOARD OF WATER COMM ENG FEES 240045 161E4 148.53 BOARD OF WATER C 0 MM -NG FEES •. 240B45 _6/16/84 142.97 BOARD OF MATER CJMM E'NG FEES 702.34 240C26 , a /16 /84 52.28 CANVAS PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 52.28 f 240C33 Lcs/16/84 94.80 CAPITot, SUPPLY SUPPLIES 24DC33 6 /16 184 97. 0 0 CAPITOL SUPPLY SUPPLIES 192.60 240C34 t;8/16/84 139.95 CAPITOL SALES SUPPLIES 139.95 # As , o sv 4a. J.. { Z z' CLFAIj STEP PUSS 44.55 t 89.10 30.81 1984 C?TY OF MAFL_WC00 CEMST ONE P R 0O UC TS 65.61 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS 26.'0 CHECK NC. DATE 245942 CATCO 245.42 * 36. r 2.4UC36 u0 116/Q4 j COUNTRY STORE 476 34.54 _ 240C38 16 /F 4 6890 R 24UC3� rz5 /16/ ?4 32973 OA TA DISPATCHING 32.73 * 24t3C3o :b / 1 6 i84 - CEGF GARD;. N CTR 14UC39 0/16/84 89e70 240CT9 89.70 j 14UC3S ,6/16/84 t._ �/16/F I • 24r C41 - '6/16/84 240C45 L 0/16 /84 f lk 24UC92 ,o/16/84 { 24DtrP2 Wo/16184 �J 240035 �jb/16/84 F% F� tj C7 j 24U0 37 ,:r$/16/84 Fj F 24UC39 0/16/84 c # *fir #4 i 240045 6/16/E4 i, s PAGE 5 CHECK R —EGIST"R AM VENDC ITEM DESCRIPTION 1 .31 R. a0 CARE ANIMAL CONTROL ANIMAL CONTROL 1 X318.30 # 44955 CLFAIj STEP PUSS 44.55 CLEAN STEO PUGS 89.10 30.81 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS 71 CEMST ONE P R 0O UC TS 65.61 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS 26.'0 Cr—OSTONE DRODUCTS 194.58 * 245942 CATCO 245.42 * 36. C SPRTAGS 36.70 9.55 COUNTRY STORE 476 34.54 COUNTRY STORE 4.76 44.19 6890 R C PA 32973 OA TA DISPATCHING 32.73 * 3945 - CEGF GARD;. N CTR 3.45 * 89e70 CI SPA TCM 89.70 SER V. CES S=RVTCES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PARTS SER V ?CES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES PUBLICATI CN 9984 CITY OF MAPLEW COD AMOUNT 406.59- 436.59 43.56 14.52 72.61 406.59 377.55 58.^ 8 348.51 13n. - 7 0 1 P 4 52.1 2 242.88 242.18 160, ^n 16n. ''D t 39600. 'W ? 9 600 0 4560%0 456.JO R. ^0 1.00 r 63.20 63.20 63.20 63.20 63.20 43.?0 43.20 43.20 43 43.20 43 * ?0 43.20 43.20 18.00 18.0 PAGE 6 CHECK CHECK NC. DATE ITEM DESCRIPTION EASTMAN 240 E0.7 08/16/8 4 EASTMAN KODAK 240E J 3 /16/8 I KODAK .- 240E ^7 Jt3/16/84 SERVICES EASTMAN 240. En7 08/16/84 EASTMAN KODAK 24UEC7 %, 6/16/84 K IDA K _ 240E ^7 LS/16/84 SER VI CES EASTMAN 240 E"-" 7 8 / 16 18 4 EASTMAN KODAK 240 7 / 16 Its 4 K SERVICES 24U E�'7 G & K SERVICES .240; ? 16 /8 4 K SER VI CE � UNIFORMS C b K _ 240E15 x/16/84 K SERVICES UNIFORMS G 8 K 24::42 = Rl16/84 240Eg7 :8/16/84 E � � t 3 7 F Z 2 4 1 r �, v - 116r@4 r. i 240F ^5 CF/16184 P Aft !{ 24JG1U :.3/16/84 Al 240 GI(j 6/84 .. 24UG1 J J3/16/84 240GI0 C8 /16/F4 240 C1Z, j 24 GI 24C 2 1 240G1; n3/16/84 240G10 ;,6/16/84 24JGI6 08/16/84 24J Cl u X3/16/84 24JG1G :;?/16/84 44L) GlU ;,t/16/84 24UG10 J8/17/84 f 24U G10 : 8 /17 8 4 k 3 AMOUNT 406.59- 436.59 43.56 14.52 72.61 406.59 377.55 58.^ 8 348.51 13n. - 7 0 1 P 4 52.1 2 242.88 242.18 160, ^n 16n. ''D t 39600. 'W ? 9 600 0 4560%0 456.JO R. ^0 1.00 r 63.20 63.20 63.20 63.20 63.20 43.?0 43.20 43.20 43 43.20 43 * ?0 43.20 43.20 18.00 18.0 PAGE 6 E K 0UE'4 L SUPPLIES ELK R !VER CONCRETE SUPPLIES ESS BROTWERS b SONS SUPPLIES FABRA 13PAPHICS SUPPLIES FAUS DANTEL CCNF G b K CHECK REGISTER _�.. VENDCR ITEM DESCRIPTION EASTMAN KODAK SER VICES EASTMAN KODAK SERVICES EASTM KODAK SERVICES EASTMAN KODAK SERVICES EASTMAN KJJAK SERVICES EASTMAN KODAK SERVICES EA ST MA N K IDA K SER VICES EASTMAN KODAK SER VI CES EASTMAN K'10AK SER VICES EASTMAN KODAK SERVICES E K 0UE'4 L SUPPLIES ELK R !VER CONCRETE SUPPLIES ESS BROTWERS b SONS SUPPLIES FABRA 13PAPHICS SUPPLIES FAUS DANTEL CCNF G b K SEPVI CAS UNIFORMS G b K SERVICES uhrFCRMS G b K SERVICES UNIFORMS G 8 K SERVICES UNIFCRMS G b K SERVICES UNIFORMS r 9 K SERVICES uNrFORMS G 8 K SEPVI CES UNIFORMS G b K SERVTCES UNIFORMS G & K SER UNIFORMS G b K SERVICES UNIFORMS G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS G b K SER VI CE � UNIFORMS C b K SEPWICES UNIFORMS G b K SERVICES UNIFORMS G 8 K SERVI CEIS UNIFORMS AMOUNT 1 8.00 18.00 733.50 333.84 R.24 342.:8 268.28 235.28 5C3.56 32.99 25.14 58.13 1 ' 1, ^12.50 * 33.31 33.31 * PAGE 7- 56.73 21.t� 17,50 9.55 44 .36 96970 3O.5 0 10995 270n, T 58.00 371 *63 + CHECK REGISTER _ V#E NOG' G & K SERVICES G S K SERVICES GENERAL TIRE S =RV GEhE'RAL TIRE SrERV GM''DY= A►R T T RE C A ITEM OESCRIPTION UNI F OR MS UNIFORMS PARTS REPAIRS SUPPLIES GOODYEAR TIRE CO SUPPLIES GSNUTNr- PARTS PARTS GENUINE FARTS PARTS GRACE OUANE C GREW JANET Ho c*:)* ".C.a. H.C. ?. H. C.O. N.C.O. N.C. 1. ti. C.J . 1!.C.O. H.C.j • INSPECTION FEES MILEAGE FUE L FUE L FUE L FUEL FUEL FUE L FUE L - FUE' L FUEL FUEL 9.66 9.66 HALLI NG EROS 29*10 HEJNY RENTALS INC ?9.00 S 310.:0 HEJNY RENTALS INC 369. U 0 40.00 INDEPENDENT #622 IW CITY OF MAFLc6COO CHECK Nl. OAT Z. 240G1u 24UG10 08/16/84 ,a J 2.40G44 -8/16/84 .240 C44 :;8/16/8A l � 2 -4 i G 4 5 C'3l16/84 240 C45 J8/1S/84 2400+6 x 24UG46 J8/16/y4 I 245 G57 :: °/16/84 t{ .2 =4.0G�58 Q a _/16/84 z, 2411 -05 :R/15/84 24J F r %5 16 184 • 240E -n'5 0/16/84 2.4JNC5 68/16/8 t �I 24LHL5 .. /161F 24ulJC5 x/16/8 i 240HJ5 J3/16/84 { 240 E•C5 CS/16/84 24U 5 ri8/16/84 24U-05 r8/16 Aw : 4�N1,2 08/16/84 i 2401 -24 JR /16 /84 • 44U1 -24 08/16/84 :a 240 1 -2 4 08/16/84 • 4; k 240I3U 08/16/84 tl i' f� AMOUNT 1 8.00 18.00 733.50 333.84 R.24 342.:8 268.28 235.28 5C3.56 32.99 25.14 58.13 1 ' 1, ^12.50 * 33.31 33.31 * PAGE 7- 56.73 21.t� 17,50 9.55 44 .36 96970 3O.5 0 10995 270n, T 58.00 371 *63 + CHECK REGISTER _ V#E NOG' G & K SERVICES G S K SERVICES GENERAL TIRE S =RV GEhE'RAL TIRE SrERV GM''DY= A►R T T RE C A ITEM OESCRIPTION UNI F OR MS UNIFORMS PARTS REPAIRS SUPPLIES GOODYEAR TIRE CO SUPPLIES GSNUTNr- PARTS PARTS GENUINE FARTS PARTS GRACE OUANE C GREW JANET Ho c*:)* ".C.a. H.C. ?. H. C.O. N.C.O. N.C. 1. ti. C.J . 1!.C.O. H.C.j • INSPECTION FEES MILEAGE FUE L FUE L FUE L FUEL FUEL FUE L FUE L - FUE' L FUEL FUEL 9.66 9.66 HALLI NG EROS 29*10 HEJNY RENTALS INC ?9.00 HEJNY RENTALS INC 310.:0 HEJNY RENTALS INC 369. U 0 40.00 INDEPENDENT #622 o 1p SUPPLIES RENTAL. RENTAL RENTAL SUPPLIES F •� f 5 1984 CITY OF MAFL =6000 r^ KLY LEGAL FEES 6 CHECK h 3. DA TE L LEGAL FEES 45.00 LAIS RANNTGAN KLY LEGAL FEEc 123.75 LAIS BA►NNIGAN 240 1 90 j8/16/F 'i 14UI9U 8/1S/E4 2-4 7 ,,3:x: /1b/�4 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES MEMBERSHIP y. .240132 16 184 • ## #mot# 30'5 LA6 .14L'035 t;8/16/p4 SUPPLIES off # ## 24.0.;45 x:8/16/ 84 .r 240 qj47 '08/16/ 8 4 24UK5P a O E/161F4 • 24Q L1 6 �6 16 / 84 24GL16 13/16/84 �• 2.40L16 /15,P4 —40L16 /16/84 Ab 240L31 L.8/16IP4 ` 24L ` -"8/16/8I PAGE 8 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT _�.....__ _ ._ VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 40.00 15 •'20 INTL CONF BLDG OFLS BOOKS 120 ."0 INTL CONE SLOG OFLS MEMBERSHIP 135.0 0 +� 2.. ^0 J&J TROP"IES SUPPLIES 22001-0 * _ 257946 J.L. SHIELY CC SUPPLIES 251.46 * 12.50 JiM HATICH SAL'S SUPPLIES 82, 50 * 7.69 JOLLY SUPPLIES 7.69 * 34.05 JOLLY 11YME FAVORS SUPPLIES 34.05 * 45936 KOKESH ATHLETIC SUPPLIES 45.36 * 39296.26 LAIS BANKTGAN KLY LEGAL FEES 6 LAIS 9ANNIGAN KLY LEGAL FEES 45.00 LAIS RANNTGAN KLY LEGAL FEEc 123.75 LAIS BA►NNIGAN KLY LEGAL FEES 3,532.51 711726.OD LEAGUE OF MN CITIES MEMBERSHIP 79726.30 30'5 LA6 ENFOPCEMENT EOUP SUPPLIES 3.75 i PAGE 9. 1904 CITY OF MAFLI4COD AMOUNT VE' N00R ITEM DESCRIPTION 25.79 CHECK AO. Do.TE � t LEES AUTC SUPPLY SUPPLIES 25.79.• Z4t�L36 �3/16 /P 4 23 *60 e4UL36 ,;8/16/84 5.32 24JL36 6/16/R4 j` 24 L36 . o/16/E4 40.99 240L36 16/R4 123 # 24JL36 L6/16/p4 42.59 24UL3o .;5/16/E4 23.40 LESLIE PAPER SUPPLIES 85.19 LESLIE PAPER SUPPLIES 2 E3.95 240 L45 8l16/P4 340.14 24^ L45 8 /15/84 14.20 24J L4 5 .: 6/16/64 425 . Q3 i4^L45 = b/16/E4 198.75 Z4uL45 �.R/16/84 1 # 240L45 .:6/16/84 1 1673 0 9 1 14UL45 7,6 /16 /P4 1 �hTB.91 : 240 L45 :.8/16/84 t Lf'NG Lid TRACTOR FARTS 20.41 LING LM TRACTOR PARTS 173o63 24 va/13/84 39.70 L ^NG LM TRACT CR PARTS 786.23 * 24GL75 ;; A/16/A4 99.3D 24UL75 ,:x/16/8A 99.30 * 24UL75 16/84 945.48 _240L75 � /16/F4 945.48 3 707. X50 METRO I NSP SERVICE INSFECTIt N FEES 3.707* 50 # 178,078 240- L85 X8/16/84 .20 MINN MIN14G CO SUPPLIES 178.98 240w2 08/16/84 240x48 X8/16/84 240 P55 16 /84 240M55 06/17/81 PAGE 9. CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VE' N00R ITEM DESCRIPTION 25.79 LEES AUTO SUPPLY SUPPLIES 25 LEES AUTC SUPPLY SUPPLIES 25.79.• LEES AUTO SUPPLY SUPPLIES 23 *60 LEES AUTO SUPPLY SUPPLIES 5.32 LEES AUTO SUPPLY SUPPLIES 10030 LETS AUTO SUPPLY SUPPLIES 40.99 LEES AUTO SUPPLY TOOLS 123 # 42.59 LESLIE PAPER SUPPLIES 23.40 LESLIE PAPER SUPPLIES 85.19 LESLIE PAPER SUPPLIES 2 E3.95 LESLIE PAPER SUPPLIES 340.14 LESLIE PAPER SUPPLIES 14.20 LESLIE PAPER SUPPLIES 425 . Q3 LESLIE PAPER SUPPLIES 198.75 LESLIE PA -NE R SUPPLIES 1 # 1 1673 0 9 1 L DATA PROCESS 1 �hTB.91 : 552.29 Lf'NG Lid TRACTOR FARTS 20.41 LING LM TRACTOR PARTS 173o63 LO Ltd TRACTOR PARTS 39.70 L ^NG LM TRACT CR PARTS 786.23 * 99.3D LUGER LUMBER SUPPLIES 99.30 * 945.48 METRO WASTE ACC OUNTS REC 945.48 3 707. X50 METRO I NSP SERVICE INSFECTIt N FEES 3.707* 50 # 178,078 MINN MINI.%G CC SUPPLIES .20 MINN MIN14G CO SUPPLIES 178.98 19F4 CITY OF MAPLE WOOD PAGE 10 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT _._ VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 224.45 t40r59 8/16/p4 121.94 24C N59 C6/16/84 27.30 240M59 8/16/84 373.69 165 sJ0 24U 2 Li 0/16/ 165040 24LP62 L6116/A4 330.00 PAUL CITY 12.JJ 247rb9 .8/16/F4 PAUL CITY 2 _ 240r '9' 16 'P 4 CITY 41705 NORT a 240 h2.: !.:8116/84 69.71 hORTIH ST MAUL 240N3% 0,8/16/84 NORTH 24U IN 3v 6/16 84 CITY. 240h3°: �j6/16Ip4 ST 240N3:. :.8/16/84 6.J3 240h3c: C- 6/15/P4 _ 24Uti3 X8/16/84 NORTH 240 A3L 16/P4 CITY 240N3.) ;;b/1b/8 240h3 :x/16184 11.96 t!4 * *f GEOFF 24005u ;,x/15/84 �i► FETERSON BELL 240F3.i 08/16/84 r 3.50 'PHOTOS IL 24UP47) 8/161e4 PAGE 10 12,00 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT _._ VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 224.45 MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT SUPPLIES 121.94 MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT SUPPLIES 27.30 MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT SUPPLIES 373.69 165 sJ0 MN CRIME P PEVENTI 311 RENTAL 165040 MN CRIME PREVENTION RENTAL 330.00 PAUL CITY 12.JJ MINN STATE TREASURER BOOKS 12,00 9 • ^00.00 POTORCLA INC 17,71 hEEOELS CJ 3.5 3 N ORTH ST PAUL CITY 2.40 NORTH ST PAUL CITY 2 NORTH ST PAU L. CITY 41705 NORT ST P 4UL CITY 69.71 hORTIH ST MAUL CITY 101.18 NORTH ST PAUL CITY. 47.12 NORTH ST PAUL. CITY 6.J3 MIRTH ST PAUL CITY 555.56 NORTH ST PAUL CITY 1 •205.713 11.96 OLSON GEOFF 11.x'6 2.075.00 FETERSON BELL CONV 2 9 075 o OO 3.50 'PHOTOS TO GO RADIO ED SUPPLIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTI LI TIE'S MILEAGE LEGAL FEE SUPPLIES PAGE 11 CHECK REGISTER s;. :ar end. r i VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION r "r 279114.[0 P��LAR CHEV 1984 CITY IF MAFLEV 31D -, 76.50 PRCFESSIONAL FROCESS SERVICES 76.50 f CHECK %C. G•: TE 27406 R A MSE Y COUNTY MAI NT 2T4.1 6 15.80 REFLECTO PRODUCTS SUPPLIES _ 15.Q0 f 24C F52 C6/16/84 ,i 11,54 RICHARDS SUPPLIES _ 15.71 RICHARDS VA 24CP67 CK/16/81 SUPPLIES 10.20 RICHAROS SUPPLIES 240PC9 „6/16/84 SUPPLIES 25.51 RICHARDS SUPPLIES 63.20 R ICHA RDS SUPPLIES _ 5C.13 RI CHARDS SUPPLIES 24.14 R I CHARDS 24UP28 .:8/16/84 - R i C SUPPLIES _ 255.35 t 33.48- e4CP39 �, .: /16 399,3 7 ROAD RESCUE 24CR39 '-3/16/84 ROAD RESCUE EQUIP ,e 4JP39 .:8/16/?4 EQUIP 1 +� Z4UR3Q j'�/16/84 23.25 RYCO SUPPLY CC Z4CF39 ^r, /1b /F4 24DR39 :x8/16/84 SUPPLIES _ 46.25 Z4U! -39 r- 8/16/84 33.44 S 9 T OFFICE 24Ua39 C3 /16 Z4uR39 ;.6/16/84 240 z39 16/84 240 a3 ..�l16 /84 • 240P49 , 6/16/84 240; Q49 .o/16/84 24CP44 ' b /16/8 t 24C F49 X8/16 /84 14JR90 x6/16/84 • i 24CS05 C,ri /16!84 240SO5 J8/16/P4 i 240SO5 0 PAGE 11 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 3.50 "r 279114.[0 P��LAR CHEV VEHICLES 27 9114. + -, 76.50 PRCFESSIONAL FROCESS SERVICES 76.50 f 27406 R A MSE Y COUNTY MAI NT 2T4.1 6 15.80 REFLECTO PRODUCTS SUPPLIES _ 15.Q0 f 6.1 ? R; CHA RDS SUPPLIES 11,54 RICHARDS SUPPLIES _ 15.71 RICHARDS SUPPLIES 30 R I CHARDS SUPPLIES 10.20 RICHAROS SUPPLIES 29.76 RICHARDS SUPPLIES 25.51 RICHARDS SUPPLIES 63.20 R ICHA RDS SUPPLIES _ 5C.13 RI CHARDS SUPPLIES 24.14 R I CHARDS SUPPLIES 15.23 R i C SUPPLIES _ 255.35 t 33.48- PrAO RESCUE R =PAIRS 399,3 7 ROAD RESCUE REPAIRS _ 375.70 ROAD RESCUE EQUIP 375 *0fl RIAD RESCUE EQUIP 1 +� _ 23.25 RYCO SUPPLY CC SUPPLIES 23.25 + 48.85 _ S. 8 T OFF TCE SUPPLIES _ 46.25 S 9 T OFFICE SUPPLIES 33.44 S 9 T OFFICE SUPPLIES PAGE 12 k:l C "ECK REGISTER a t 1984 CITY OF MAPLE 6000 ITEM DESCRIPTION 18.56 S g T OFFICE CHECK tiC. DATE E • 240SO5 16/84 2'0016 240505 08/16/84 SUPPLIES 240S- L8./15184 • 24US'i5 ^8/16/84 S & T OFFICE 2405' �F /16/84 34,44 240SC:5 6/A4 0 240 S�' S _.. 1 t �/ 6/P 240SJ5 tir3/16/84 S 8 T OFFICE 2405 5 c /16 /8 4 • 240 Sjl5 84 ' 240S:j5 8/16/F4 24USL5 Ca'" 16/F4 _ +► 240SO5 08/16/P4 -' 240SG5 08/16/84 i 48.85 S 8 T OFF ;CE SUPPLIES 48.85- S 8 T OFFICE 24.0S3-� '06/15/ 319.16 240S3u 08/16/84 240S3� 8/16!$4 24053 :.3/1�/F4 SEARS #8412 140:3: ?/'16/84 12073 240S3:� /1b/F4 =' ► 24L S3L SEARS #!8412 53u `8/16/9-4 SEARS #8412 240S3� r 116/64 24, z5 SEARS #8412 SUPPLIES 89 SEARS #8412 TOOLS 71804 SEARS #8412 240S39 '8/16/84 8 71.99 24C5 39 r/16/F4 E QU IP ME NT c4U539 .;+6/16/9-4 �► 24U540 08/16/84 SHORT ELLI3T HENOR ENG SERV • 240%. 7E/16/F4 �r 3 ,9604.73 SHORT TLLI , )T H =NDR EKG SERV 59032.07 s 117.00 240558 L-8/16184 117.00 240S5F 08/16/84 • 24US5F a8 /1b /F�4 INC 24CS58 ; 8/16/84 24US 5F u6/16/84 i 24GS5F "F/16/e4 #Ap 24US59 - 6/16/84 CF REPAIRS 357 * 90 C "ECK REGISTER AMOUNT _ VENDCR ITEM DESCRIPTION 18.56 S g T OFFICE SUPPL IES •64 S 9 T OFFICE SUPPLIES 2'0016 S 9 T OFFICE SUPPLIES 17.53 S a T OFFICE SUPPL IES 16.38 S & T OFFICE SUPPLIES 34,44 S 8 T OFFICE SUPPLIES 43.38 a .9 T OFF ICE SUPPLIES 78.10 S 8 T OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 7, 53 S .9 T OFF *CE SUPPLIES 16.3 R S 9 T OFFICE SUPPL IES 78 S 8 T OFF ICE SUPPLIES 5.32 S 9 T OFFICE SUPPLIES 48.85 S 8 T OFF ;CE SUPPLIES 48.85- S 8 T OFFICE SUPPLIES 319.16 47.26 SEARS #8412 SUPPLIES 27 SEARS #8412 SUPPL. I ES 12073 S TARS #8412 SUPPLIES 19.999 SEARS #!8412 SL:PPL IES 27.99 SEARS #8412 SUPPLIES 24, z5 SEARS #8412 SUPPLIES 89 SEARS #8412 TOOLS 71804 SEARS #8412 EQUIPMENT 8 71.99 S= ARS #8412 E QU IP ME NT 1,839.45 1 ,0?6.79 SHORT ELLI3T HENOR ENG SERV 4 CO,58 SHORT ELLIOT HENDR ENG SERV 3 ,9604.73 SHORT TLLI , )T H =NDR EKG SERV 59032.07 117.00 SCHOELL&PADSON INC ENG SERV 117.00 29688.17 SOLIDIFICATION INC SERVICES 2,688,17 * 49. 'Om ST PAUL CITY CF REPAIRS 49,10 ST PAUL CITY CF REPAIRS 357 * 90 ST PAUL CITY CF MA I NT 49.00 ST PAUL CI TT OF REPAIRS 1 9 9 .40 ST PAUL CITY OF MAINT 585.40 ST PAUL CITY CF 10 A I NT 1 .191.90 5.49 STAPLES PAULI NE SUPPLIES PAGE 13 CHECK RESISTER AMOUNT 1984 CITY OF MAFLEWD 5.49 4, 798.40 CHECK NO* O4 T E rl k" a� TELE•TERPINALS RENTAL �I �4vT ...0/16/84 713.05 TKCA ENG SERV �a _s �i r 240T42 s`r I16 /F P UNIVERSAL MEDICAL S- UPPL:ES 44.?0 # I F 36.J 6 24UY65 6 /F4 7 86.90 240 L° 86 k � /1b /84 -; 240U86 29030 V4HL b WAHL SUPPLIES a 1 8. %9 240V15 S UPPLIES s �d WARNERS TRUE V:LU SUPPLIES 18.11 240V5L 8/16/p4 29.62 VARNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 29962 24JWI SUPPL IES 31.95 WARNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 15.69 WARNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES s WARNE. RE TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 99.19 240 W21 r78/16/84 ' 240 6 21 i:8 /16 /F4 29.62 240k21 8/16/84 299.76 24U W 21 08/16/ F4 240W21 R/16/84 24CV21 3/16/84 24U 1,21 4-ic/16/84 2 ^F116/F4 i 240650 1,8/16/84 240 w5U .8/16/8y 2 08/16/84 PAGE 13 CHECK RESISTER AMOUNT VENDCR ITEM! DcSCPIPTION 5.49 4, 798.40 T,A.SCMIFSKY SONS !MT SUPPLIES 49798.40 # x15 0 TELE•TERPINALS RENTAL 815,00 • 713.05 TKCA ENG SERV 713.05 � 2 0.40 UVIVERSAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES 2z. i0 UNIVERSAL MEDICAL S- UPPL:ES 44.?0 # I F 36.J 6 VA LS BODY SHOP AIR 836.06 +� 86.90 VIRTUE PFINTINS SUPPLIES 86.90 * 29030 V4HL b WAHL SUPPLIES 29.80 * 1 8. %9 WARNE TR UE VALU S UPPLIES 2,49 WARNERS TRUE V:LU SUPPLIES 18.11 WARNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 29.62 VARNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 29962 WARNERS TRUE VALU SUPPL IES 31.95 WARNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 15.69 WARNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 12.56 WARNE. RE TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 99.19 29.62 -. WE8ER- TxR CSE T H INC PAR TS 29.62 VEBER- TROSE TH INC PAR TS 299.76 MEEER- 71RCSETH INC PARTS I� PAGE 14 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT 1984 CITY OF MAFLrWCOD 6*50 WEBER - PRCSET4 INC SER VT CE S 19*50 CHECK NC. OATE 395900 71*47 240 W5 L 8116/8 4 81 .24 240 Ou 08/16/8 152.71 36*75 WINDSOR MT MATERIAL 95e?O 240 66u ' 018 /16 /84 46. ^ 240660 08 116/24 178.45,* 16*18 240W77 C 8/16l8 4 42*74 240 W77 w?/16/84 58.92 * 24U 617 16 184 123.97 Xc Rox XER CX 1 2 3 .97 24U 30 j8/16/E4 24704 * 2 40 k 9 0, 8/16/ 89090 ZEP MFG CO SUPPLIES 89090 17*53- Z4U X 3J 8/16/84 17*53 24 X 3 8/ 16/8 egn 879497*78 240 Z 3 U 8 16 8 4 1031-941 Am HYDRANT CHAP GE 3,600. Imp, 250 V! 5 8 /16 /B 4 3706 2 50 5 78116/E 17*38 FUND 35 TOTAL 834-16 MAPLEWD PROFESS VE 322*30 -dew -low 84m1 '.,LAU%"-.,;-"I ADDITION 713. Adw 94-m4 1ACCLELLAND ST WTR 184*50 FUND 47 TOTAL 78-10 HILLWO100 OR/ CORLAt 45*00 FUND 50 TOTAL 79m24 BEAT AV/Y*FP.M HY t CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDCR ITEM 0ES%"V'RIPTlON 6*50 WEBER - PRCSET4 INC SER VT CE S 19*50 VEBER-IRCSETH INC PARTS 395900 71*47 W It- SC 0 SUPPLIES 81 .24 W 47- S C a SU PPLI ES 152.71 36*75 WINDSOR MT MATERIAL 95e?O WINDSOR MT MATER - TAL 46. ^ w I No .4.31 a R MT MATER 178.45,* 16*18 U k GRAINGER SUPPLIES 42*74 W W GRAINGER SUPPLIES 58.92 * 123.97 Xc Rox XER CX 1 2 3 .97 XEROX XER CX 24704 * 89090 ZEP MFG CO SUPPLIES 89090 17*53- S & T OFFICE SUPPLI 17*53 S & T OFFICE SUPPLIES egn 879497*78 FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL 1031-941 FUND 03 TOTAL HYDRANT CHAP GE 3,600. FUND 12 TOTAL STREET CCNSTR STATE AID 3706 FUND 34 TOTAL 83m14 GCFF%,.' MAPL7VI;rw 17*38 FUND 35 TOTAL 834-16 MAPLEWD PROFESS VE 322*30 FUND 36 TOTAL 84m1 '.,LAU%"-.,;-"I ADDITION 713. FUND 39 TOTAL 94-m4 1ACCLELLAND ST WTR 184*50 FUND 47 TOTAL 78-10 HILLWO100 OR/ CORLAt 45*00 FUND 50 TOTAL 79m24 BEAT AV/Y*FP.M HY t 33oQ0 FUND 55 TOTAL 80-05 W B AV7fB T%d' HY 3t 148.63 FUND 5F TOTAL 8C-010 Hy 61 FRNTG ROAD 1 , o1 2 FUND 65 TOTAL 81-12 HOLLOJAY AV-7 142*97 FUND 85 TOTAL 83m3 CAVE'S CENTRY 3RD V 3 , FUND 86 TOTAL 83-*4 MCKNIGHT RD WATER . PAGE 15 1984 . CITY OF MAFLE:6CCO IJ CHECK REGISTER CHECK NC• 0:*TE AMOUNT _ . V6ENOZ -'• ITEM DESCRIPTION 6 9 271. Z1 2546 FUYD 90 TOTAL SANITARY SEiiEP FUND FUND 9b TOTAL V =NIC � LE _GU.P MAINT 105,746.39 TCT4L i 3 �� INDICATES ITEMS FINANCED BY RECREATIONAL FEES r - i08 -03 8 4 C:tY �F M PILE WU0j PAYROLL• _ CHECKS R: GIStER CYCLE B015 CHECK OATS OO -OOwnO PERIOD ENDING 00 -00 -00 PAG9 1 DEPT- NO 'MPL•NJ EMPLOYEE NAME' CHECK-NO AMOUNT CLEAREO 1 X002 494369671 AEHM LOtS N 0807 -00001 459.01 I ) a002 206242018 EVANS BARRY R 0801- 00002 19236.42 I Io, .3002 19695.43 ' �. 0010 473664474 JAHN DAVIO J 0807 -00003 106 24 Jo10 473403147 JOHNSON GREGORY R 0807 -00004 0.00 t x ) 0010 469 536523 SWANSOWJR. LYLE E 080 7 -00005 51900 I 1 0010 625.24 J012 35 73401 66 CUDE LARRY J 080?-00006 1 75.61 I ) 0012 473 520124 DOHERTY KATHLEEN M 0807 -00007 81.74 i 0012 471400908 ZUER� HER JOHN L 0801?-00008 10304 t ) 0012 361.29 0021 469501078 FAUST DANIEL F 0807 - 00009 1035o47 I ) 0021 469743)'19 MEYER NANCY E 0807 -00010 450.83 c ) 0021 19 486.30 + 0022 469200614 HAGEN ARLINE J 0807 -00011 489902 1 l 0022 390444446 MATH_r ALA NA K 0807 -00012 543.52 I ) UU22 4T67U4432 MOELLER MARGARET A 0807 -00013 0000 I x ) UO22. 473327550 VIGNALO DELORES A 0807m00014 464.88 0022 1 497 42 ' 0031 471322198 AURELIUS LUCILLE E 0807 -00015 845,92 t ) i' UU31 474264816 SELVOG BETTY 0 0807 - 00016 520.61 I ) 0031 1'9366o53 • _ ^ - 0033 477288389 GREEN PHYL C 0807-00017 586.53 I ) 1 0033 472244994 HENSLEY PATRICIA A 0807 -00018 195.45 I 0033 4T6621)547 KELS_ CONNIE L 080 -00019 209022 I OU33 476269515 SCHADT JOANNE L 0807 -00020 189.95 I ) f , UU3 3 468364435 VI ETOR LORR A I NE S 0807-40021 444.23 ) JU33 1 ! 62 5.38 0034 474097528 STOTTLEMYTR EDITH i H G 8 - o 07 00022 0000 c x) 0034 3041 468461717 COLLINS KENNETH V 08D7 -00023 T0. 28 `.� JU41 475 323183 NELSON ROBERT 0 080 7 -00024 649.91 I ) 0041 477221636 OMATM JOY E C80 7 -00025 427070 t ) +, 0041 471502356 RICHIE CAROLE L 0807 -00026 425.97 I ) 4 3041 469602934 SVENOSEtN JOANNE M 0807 -00027 506.58 c ) �. U041 29080.44 $ =a3 84 CltY �)P Mp"NP PAYR.JLL CHECKS 1EGIStER CYCLE B315 CHECK DATE 00.00 -00 PERIOD ENDING 00 -00 -00 PAGE 2 0 Pt - NO '%MPL -NO EMPLOYEE !DAME CHECK•NO AMOUNT CLEARED 1 K b i , 0042 477481364 ARNOLO DAVID L 0807 - 00028 321.64 ( ) JJ42 4 71 4321 15 ATCHI S+ON JOIN H 0807-00029 711.82 t ) J042 476721577 BANICK JOHN J 0807 -00030 528.55 t ) 0042 469689867 BOWMAN RICK A 0807 -00031 652.84 t ) JU42 469461930 CLAUSON DALE K 0807 -00032 764.52 t ) 0J42 476446119 DREG- RTCMARO C 0807 -00033 796,64 t ) JU42 479267987 GREEN NORMAN L 0807-00034 674.24 t ) U042 46956 951 6 HALWEG KEVIN R 0807 -09035 616, 35 t ) 0042 473694916 HERBERT. MICHAEL J 0807- ►00036 588.47 t ) U042 472222231 KORTUS DONALD V 0807 - 00037 414.66 t ) C042 4 71 56 3591 LANG RICHARD J 0807-00038 5 83.71 t ) 0042 4 76401 388 LEE ROGER w 0807 -00039 673.10 t ) 0042 474637686 MEEHAN*:JR JAMES E 0807 -00040 71009 t ) 0042 469442963 MOESf HTER RICHARD M 0807- 010041 236.39 t ) 0042 476340990 MORELLI RAYMOND J 0801 -00042 576.49 t ) J042 468462884 PEL.TI ER WILL I AM F 0807 -00043 673.97 t ) 0042 471564801 RYAN MICHAEL P 0807-- 00044 628.88 t ) UU42 47n520457 SKALMAN DONALD W 0807 - 00045 380.10 t ) 0042 473548226 STAFNE GREGORY L 0807 -00046 714.21 t ) UU42 471721204 STEFFEN SCOTT L 0807 -00 ^47 323.46 t ) 0042 471 530251 STILL VERNON T 080 7 -00048 761.15 t ) JJ42 471629204 STOCKTON DERRELL T 0801 -00049 795,56 OU42 471602052 THOMALLA DAVID J 0807- 00050 507.77 t ) UU42 475363333 WILLIAMS DUANE J 0801 -00051 478.82 t ) 3042 474260130 ZAPPA JOSEPH A 0807 -00052 737.78 t 1 0042 149852.11 JU43 475 548434 BECKER RONALD D 0807.00053 308.98 t ) UU 43 469441 789 GRAF DAVIO M 080 T -00054 615.93 t ) 3043 469820466 HEINZ STEPHEN J 0807 - 00055 765.36 ) UU43 392,760009 KARIS FLINT D 0807 -00056 137.33 t ) 0043 473567791 MELAMDER JON A 0807 -00057 33.05 t ) 3043 468360918 NELSJN CAROL M 10801 -00058 1 9010,98 t ) 0043 471504316 RAZSKAZIOFF DALE E 0807 - 01059 702.52 t ) JU43 474486371 VORWERK ROBERT E 0807 - 00060 227.31 t ) 3043 469502201 YOUNGRI3N JAMES G 08074000061 774.95 t 1 9043 4 9576.41 0045 471401979 EMBERTSON JAMES M 0807 -00062 716.50 t ) 0045 472242227 SCHADT r ALFRED C 0807 -00063 790.`33 t ) 0045 1 9506.83 • 0046 468401899 CAHANES ANTHONY G 0807 - 01064 74.53 t ) 0046 477627236 FLAUGHEIR JAYME L 0807 -00065 462.30 t ) 0046 376709873 MADELL RAYMOND M 48n7 -00066 451.04 t ) OJ46 413407J 3J MARTIN SHAWN M 080 7 -00067 449.26 t j 0046 472365919 NELSON KAREN A 080 -00068 453.68 t I U04 6 46P,600183 R 48I4E JANET L 0807-00069 451.04 t ) CITY 3F M:a PL: NOu`D 'A YR OLL CHEC KS i E GI ST ER CYCLE 8 315 CHECK DATE 00-00-00 PERIOD ENDING 00 -00 -00 PAG1' 3 i OF PT•NO �MDL•NO EMPLOYEIE NAME CH ECK•NO AMOUNT CLEARED JJ46 41770 STAH4KE JULIE A 10807 -00070 373071 A 0046 2 ,o71 5.56 t 0 _051 471440267 BART4 MARIE L 0807 -OG^71 247.85 t ) ' 0051 473566372 HAIDER KENNETH G 0807 -00072 60.61 t ) 0051 5^4483174 WEGWERTH JUDITH A 0807 -00073 365.91 t ) { 9051 67407 • J052 4963) 9314 CASS WILLIAM C 0807 -00074 672931 t 0052 471526254 FREBERGI RONALD L 0807 -00075 396.31 t ) 0052 502544337 HELEY RONALD J 0807.00076 607.74 t ) J052 471501241 KANE MICHAEL R 0807- 00077 412.40 t ) 0052 468363473 KLAUSING HENRY F 0807 -00078 462.:68 t ) 0052 475601431 LUTZ DAVID P 0807 -00079 483,88 J052 471530547 MEYER GERALD W 0807 -03080 457.99 t ) 0052 476904500 OSWALn ER ICK D 0807.00081 336.00 t ) 0052 463166755 PRETT NER JOSEPH B 0807 -00082 825.93 0052 472241484 REIN =RT1 EDWARD A 0807 - 00083 631.69 t ) 0 052 4V1346224 TEVLI N9 JR HARRY J 0807.00084 631 t ) 0052 475589777 ZAPPA JAMES M 0807 -00085 323.70 t ) 0052 6 , t242.16 0053 472683970 AHL•JR. RAY C 0807.00086 774.70 t 9053 4 72 481310 EL IA3 JA ME S 6 0801 -00087 703.74 t ) 0053 167246109 GEISSLER WALTER M 0807 -00088 606.34 ►. JU 5 3 __.. __ 5 01464671 GESSELE JAMES T 1]80 T 00089 819.27 t ) : 0053 475441688 PECK DENNIS L 0807.00.090 549.76 t ) JU53 472662522 PR IEBE WILLIAM 0807 -00091 506.14 t ) 0053 3 ,v959.95 00 54 4 73683 77 5 LOFGREN JOINN R 0807-00092 4 38.52 t ) 0054 438.5.2 * i 005 471562563 BREHE IM ROGER W 0807 -00093 565.85 t ) r 0058 477602582 EDSON OAVIO 8 0807.00094 625.43 t ) 1 U053 477541590 MULW -E GEORGE Y J807 -00095 490.07 t ) 3058 471531,14 NADEAU EDWARD A 0807 00096 549.35 t ) r 005=3 468361720 NUTESON LAVERNE S 0807 -00097 47300 t 0058 471365993 OWEN GERALD C 0807 4800098 618.15 t ) J058 39322.75 f i J059 476249760 MACDONALD JOMN E 080 7 -00099 503,93 t ) 3059 4 MULV4NEY DENNIS M 0807 -00100 691993 t ) 17059 1 9 195.86 i -s 3061 4773U1j66 BRENNER LOIS J 0807 -00101 90.66 t ) � i ....^' T. L•°[ hT^ LTSS ��m•. � Jm-._ mm_ �5^....' �y ^.�. ^2....____"_M'•r:r }T _�'^^.•t.::_.. _-• ... ..- t- n+w. -n ...... �.+r- .�- .- .a....rt.. ..�..... L .vnS r'nh ^: =f�.r^ifi+lx Tr.i ___.. _ � _ _..�_ ^L...- .._...5'L_ 5.__- ._._�_ _ '. *P ..... ...�•:� .• -=:, _.f'_ °.. _ I. :'_" " .__'_?..__ .__._.___.._ rrrmm n on,*°? I;+ �: rtv; eilR) Y:^^"^ h " Y y ' ° �' t�. .;?,_, �*' eY}! R^.^°?' fYM r "` M. q� .Ye?tiYS: #��Pf4 �iTY�?�ana":mfirt1 - . ! , '+n ° i " F�R�fiA�91� kiP1.. 11 CITY .,F s'4ARLEWOOU lb •i DEP T -NO J061 JU61 0061 0061 J062 0062 0962 0062 0 0 -6 2 0062 J062 0062 J062 0062 0062 0062 0062 0062 9062 0062 J062 0062 0062 0063 3063 0063 0063 0063 0063 0063 0063 9963 0063 0063 0063 0063 0063 0063 3063 0063 0063 0063 0063 0063 0063 0063 ..0063 JU63 PAYROLL- CHECKS IEGISTER EMPL -40 EMPLOYEIE NAME 468341993 KRUM4EL 473260389 ODEGARD 468582618 STAPLES 474 92 8762 471447219 474639182 472303411 474924239 502544121 468584797 4739697d4 471749313 473503915 473565506 444444444 474078128 477646662 476203439 4759041$9 417881931 475745266 BREN46E BURKT GERM41IN GUSINDA HAAG HEELEY HOPKINS HUNTER L I S H A R D T L I NDOR FF MARUSKA NE AL RASCMKE SANDOU IST SANTA T O W NLEY TO WARD 5!01894242 470943175 475823190 46 89882 77 270483797 472362JIS 470962448 474442474 4'76924605 473684976 474829219 474901922 476 721 245 476900508 469943845 472921937 473925557 417988735 469983628 502 825654 475826712 474847911 476686996 4 7390878 5 47''SP114U AALCAARD ANDERSON HARTIOLMY BESETH BLACK BORASH BRYANT BUNKE CASSEDXT CASSEDAY 0 IEB= L DIND:Rf4AN DOUGHTr DRAKE FALTEI SEK F ISCH FOWLER GALBRAITH G HAMM HA RPER HE IMERL HERBER HOLLI NGSWJRTH JOHNSON 4 46 10 8.- 0 3 8 4 1 CYCLE B015. CHECK DATE 00 -00 -00 PERIOD ENDING 0G -00 +00 PAGE CHECK -NO AMOUNT CLEARED BARAAOA A 08070000102 157.06 t ) ROBERT D. 0807 -00103 972.10 t ) PAULINE 0807 -00104 589.52 t 1 1 00 9.3 4 JAY A 0807 3 20 o OO t ) MYLES R 080 T -00106 45.22 t ) DAVID A 9807 -00107 506.89 t ) MELVIN J 0807 -00108 854,81 t ) MATTHEW J 080 T -001 09 347.82 t ) R OLA NUJ 8 0807w00110 629.26 t ) THOMAS C 0807 -07111 0000 t x ) TONY 080 7 -00112 103.65 ) THOMAS D 380 -00113 0000 c x DENNIS P 0807 -00114 566.51 t ) MARK A 080 7- *00115 608, 89 � ) TODD Y 080 7 -00116 0009 t x) ALBE F 0807-00117 0000 t x ) THOMAS J 080 7 -00118 0.00 t x ) REED E 0807-00119 1 50, 51 t ) MICHAEL F 0807 -00120 400900 ) PATRICK J 0807 -OO121 339.12 t ) TROY 6 0807-00122 3 08.28 c ) 59180.96 f ROSS A 0807 -00123 257.50 t ) CHRISTINE M 0807 -00124 209.20 JODY M 0807 -00125 0000 t x ) RONALD L 0807 -00126 0000 t x ) W ILL IA N 1 080 7 -00127 515.52 t ) DONNA F 0801 -40128 0000 t x ) ROBERT 0 0807 -00129 55,00 t ) RICHARD H 080 7 - OG 130 0000 t x ) ELIZABETH J 080 7 -00131 213.73 t ) MARY K 080 7 -00132 346.75 t ) JCE R R Y 0 0807 -00133 200.25 t ) JA N T NE M 0 80 7 -00134 0000 t x) LINDA R 0807 -00135 282950 t ) BARBARA J 0807-00136 236.O0 C ) JAMES E 080 7 - 00137 0000 t x ) SUSAN M 0807 - 03138 228.00 t ) MARY K 080 7 -00139 226.22 t ) CHRIS 080 7 -00 1 40 _ 0000 t x ) MICHAEL 0807 -00141 2 25.15 t ) D A0RA M 0807- 00142 259.88 t ) JAMES 0807-00143 0000 x ) CAROL 0807 -00144 195.53 t I K A R I N J 080 1 -00145 0.00 t x) LISA 080700146 244.00 t I JOSEPH A 0810 T -OD 147 0009 t x ) 4 46 C' JF MAPL;'WOJD 5 IOV�Qe? u 'E PAYROLL - CH ECKS I. L- ST Eq CYCL-c' 80.15 CHECK DATE 00- ►00 -00 PERIOD ENDING 00mHosdl PACE DEPT -NO % =lL -NO EMPLOYEE NAME CHECK- NO AMOUNT CLEARED 9 469806100 JOHNSON TERE SA L 0801 -- 00148 208.25 i ) J063 469862799 KANE KAREN 0801 -00149 184.47 t ) '306 3 4 7`l' 69354 8 K I ELS A K A R T J 0807 - 00 150 4 22.90 t ) J063 4 7614 3753 KLASSEN SUSAN 0807 -- 00151 185o29 t ) J063 474 T4 3915 KORTJS JAMES M 0807 -00152 0900 c x ) 005 3 468984615 KRUMMEL BECKY J 0807-00153 179 t ) 3063 4 - P2484219 LE CLAIR MARY L 0807 -OO154 137.55 t ) 3063 471269324 MAC 30NALD ELAINE E C807-00155 0 t X 1 3063 476923936 MAGILL JOSEPH M 0807 -00156 0.00 t X ) 0063 473700729 MAHRE MICHELE A 0807 -00157 0.09 t X ) 3063 47)926903 MESSIN KATHLEEN M 0807 -00158 0.00 t X ) 3063 474966150 MIHELICH CINOI L 0807 -00159 200. -85 t 3063 469583307 NI SKA JANET A 0807 -00160 57.75 t ) 0063 474745123 NOESEN CRISTIN A 0807 -00161 .25702 t ) 0063 413 565 827 OLSON ROBE RTA J 0807- 00162 0.00 t X ) 0063 472839159 aADG =TTY MARCIE D 3807 -00163 0000 t X ) 0063 46984 810 5 PEARSON LE SL IE A 080'7-&00 164 0000 t X ) 0063 472941928 PELTIER MICHAEL R 0807 -00165 0000 t X ) 3063 468827763 RAOA MICHAEL F 0807- -OO166 0000 t X ) 0063 3966[!,4919 SI NNI GER SARAH J 0807-00167 144.40 i ) 0063 477869967 SPANNBAUER DAWN M 0807 -00168 356.55 t ) 0063 46994 5370 SPANNBXUER EVA C 0807 -00169 382.00 t ) J063 469742645 SPANNBAUER KATHLEEN G 0807- 00170 278 t 0063 474845176 474845176 SPANNSArUER MARTIN J 0807 - 00171 323.71 t ) 0063 469965435 SPANNBAUER SUSAN L 0807- Of)172 210.38 t ) 0063 471920170 STRAUS LAURA J 0807 -OJ 173 0000 t X ) 0 063 476861186 SULLI VXN JULIE 0801 -00174 0000 i X ) 0063 471823921 SZUR_K JOANN M 0807.00175 0000 t X ) OU63 473625422 TAUBMAN DOUGLAS J 0807 -00176 594948 t ) U063 470963203 WALLACE JON T 080? 4 22.40 t f 0063 396324246 WARD ROY 6 080 T -00178 278.31 t ) 0063 474606610 ZA WILLIAM A 0807w00179 0000 t X V 0063 8519,47 0 064 151440508 GREW JANET M 0807 -00180 521.20 t ) 0064 411384624 IMORSIELL JUDITH A 0807 -00181 258,57 t ) 0064 474542163 SOUTTER CHRISTINE 0807 -00182 300.01 t ) 7064 1,079.78 • 0071 389448993 CHLEBECK JUDY M 0801 -00183 357.20 t ) 0071 470540551 OLSON GEOFFREY W 0807 -00184 802.86 t ) 9071 1 9 160 9 06 • 3072 417627178 EKSTRAND THOMAS G 1817 -00185 560.06 ) J972 475608505 JOHNSON RANDALL L 0807 -00186 516.91 t ) 0072 19076.97 • J073 476390677 OSTRJM MARJORIE 0807 - 00187 817.07 t ) 1073 817 *07 • 5 .. . ,...ro. -ma . +. •. +:. ,— ..... e......v +».. -.,... .. _ _ _ .... _. _ __ _ i.__ _ -.: __.. __ __ _L_ .. _,... !^^p '.'.�.^ePrt "'" F+° 1 'T Rt:N ,... ,.. _ �'b'PF?" ° "' FNC4T�NtNlvPxvf3'eTkYxeL9M d A O X 3 � CI ; F Ma PL W0U0 PAYR z _ GI srE� CY BJ 15 CHECK DATE 00.00 -00 PERIOD ENDING. 00 -00 -00 PA 6 DEPT NO EMF LmN l EMPLOYEE NAME CHECK• NO AMOUNT CLEAREO 0074 387520776 WENG -rR ROBERT j 0807.30188 563,80 t ) 9074 563.80 • { C0J NT QJ 1 68 GRAND TOTAL 70 9 430.00 r' 00 f7l 1 47 7358389 ANDEq SON NORMAN G 0807 -00189 1 28.61 t uul 1 483621 31 R BASTI AN GARY W 0807.00190 279.90 t � i J0 +�1 468200109 GREAYU JOMN C 0807- -00191 272,46 t ) 0001 412369035 MAIDA MARYLEE T 0807- 00192 279.95 t ) 0001 477056134 WASILUK MICHAEL T 0807 -00193 300.00 t ) • 0001 1926002 i COUNT 03193 GRAND TOTAL 71 * 690.92 r r i i t r� MEMORANDUM - TO: FROM: .City Mana 9 er � Associate Planner -- Johnson SUBJECT: Preliminary lat Ti ' y e Extension LOCATION: South of Londin Lane OWNER /APPLICANT: Mary Anderson Const traction Company PROJECT: Crestview Third Addition DATE: August 17, 1984 SUMMARY Je Action by Cour;cil: Endorsed_____ Modified,_ Rea acted___.__, Date . Request Approval of a one -year time extension tension for the Crestview Third Addition preliminary plat for 96 single-dwelling lots. Reasons for the . Re ues t See the applicant's enclosed le . tter. Comments The, applicant is projecting a construction g nstruction start for next spring. The es 1 re have not been any land use Chan warrant denial o request, 9 n the area or any code revisions that f this Recommendation Approve a one -year time extension for the Crestview 3rd Addition preliminary plat, subject to the original ' conditions. BACKGROUND Site Description m 1. Site size: 38 acres 2. Existing land use: undeveloped Surroundinq Land Uses Northerly: Londin Lane and Connemara condominiums Southerly: Mailand Road and single dwellings Easterly: single dwellings Westerly: Maplewoods Cooperative Past Actions 11 -1 -79: Council approved a planned unit development (86 single dwellings and ten double dwellings) for this project, with the condition that the first building permit must be issued within one year or the PUD - shall terminate, unless renewed by the city council. Council also approved a preliminary plat, subject to: 1. A signed security agreement shall be filed with the city engineer, assuring construction of the following items: a. All internal improvements, including the two drainage ponds b. That part of the pond on the adjacent town house property to the west c. An outlet pipe from the southeast pond to the Mailand Road storm sewer d. A ten -foot wide asphalt path on the north -south easement that was required by the council with the Crestview First Addition.' 2. Approval of a final grading and drainage plan by the city engineer. 3. Recording of a drainage easement . for that portion of the northwest pond on the adjacent town house property to the west. 4. Deed restrictions shall be approved by the city attorney and filed with each of the double - frontage lots, restricting drive access to the interior street. 50 The developer's agreement shall contain the erosion control procedures recommended by the Soil Conservation Service in their report of March 26, 1979, except for condition one on page three, 6 -5 -80: Council approved a 90-day time extension for the Crestview Third Addition preliminary plat, subject to the original conditions. 2 10- 16 -80: z Council. approved another 90 -day time ex tension original , subs subj to the cond and also renewed the PUD for one year . 1- 22 -81, 4 -16 -81 and 8.6 -81: Council again approved 90 -day time extension for the reliminar plat, P Y P , subject to the original conditions. 9- 13 -82: Council approved a one -year time extension for the PUP an ' d preliminary plat. In-January 1983, the applicant chose to let the PUD expire, The development is now limited to single dwellings. Planning 10 Land use plan designation: residential medium density 2. Zoning: F, farm residential RL, residential lower density and - RM, 30. Ordinance requirements: section 30 -5 of city code states that the approval period for a preliminary plat is one ear. After one e Y year, the applicant 'may apply for a time extension. �c Attachments: 10 Location map 2o Preliminary plat 3. Applicant's letter dated 8 -2 -84 3 i w I • 3 c 35 - � uPPER afTpN RO. L- L3 L- ;j L; = . 2 41 f. LOWER r ION RD . Q LONDIN t A. ♦- Z IC / V !O~`" Cr - (1) LJARY L AME Ay 39 1Z) D DAY L A NF 6$ (3) PC?+*V AVE a - (4 ) O DAY CIRC: o .� "i1 .., D �f L ^KE WpO•• • _ l T LnKwOG�. CRI VIE w OR, E fr U) }- �- m Z Z p i 0 i 0 0 0 251 23 LllvWOOD AVE. AVE 7 Opp- _. • _ VAN • L3 +17 = _ _ ' C �t (� T2BM IIJ C7 rz 7 R22.. R21% Z f."T t i 72 •' HIGHW AV 7 4 4 94 LOCATION MAP 4 Attachment 1 PM SITE PLAN ° 5 Attachment 2 4 N � • �l> �. •e 1 •• �s es e� � �� si Iii � �••• s• - oA. A jv- 46 • •1/ ASS• t 3 e� S � �s �� �� 7 �, , •� F• PRESCOT .: RD.� ! a _ w �r �► •'� 11, r 36 1• �s �S �t n • v � ti t z tw ti tei 1 its ! ►: : 10 IS tS : 1!t a 11 14 uN tie M i +d s to • ?t �` tie Y 1? 13 . ' o �1e• sit �2 • .• hi `, ` 131 s CREST �(` 10 .� e 110 e ° , , e t t W W j W 1 � � �• 111► �� q .. • 13 = • � ..• P � • - �� NS t ! s > lie ~ 1�p tto 10 14 a w � t� • �Y 13i • Z ,�r 113etl � e0 1 i � io i Ce _ r • ' E. E •o q3 Its •k� as t� ; , . _ �° 31 ° ft 10 11 is ' Al Its r, 73 L _ w e • 1 ; alb : f no -4 el 1t3 �D no c � � � �� 8D L! t7 ` ' ` to w! b �� • e fly o g rew • � o e 1 : 4 s - ,• e � t 6o - M _ . �. s o • ISO ID ti� I • � 1 t • - PM SITE PLAN ° 5 Attachment 2 4 N MARVIN K ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 8901 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 66420 August 2, 1984 Mayor John Greavu City of Maplewood c/o Mr. Randy Johnson 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mayor ' Grea vu : mary nderson BETTER HOMES FOR BETTER LIVING TELEPHONE 881 -2661 both �I1I711�1T�Frj� Nzw - I r espectful request for a one year time extension for Crestview Third Addition until September 14., 19850 '1 reali that we have had a number of extensions but we are still confident of the future in Maplewood. The past two years have been sl ower than we had expected. Two reasons seem to be our most concern. One is the proposed l a n d f i l l site which keeps coming up, hopefully that has come to an end.* We do appreciate the Cat of - Ma lewoods' a PP City p p articipation at the public hearing meetings to view their objection to the landfill site at the correction center in Maplewood. This proposed landfill site h P P as been a concern t0 many potential buyers which had finally purchased homes in Woodbury. The second reason for slow sales has been the high propert y tax in which new homes are being taxed compared to neighboring communities. We have encouraged .our homeowners to protest to Ramsey County on an individual basis to see if any change can be made. I have no ' t heard i f any of the homeowners have been successful to date We do feel now with sales coming in that the spring of 1985 we hoe to develop restview Third P P Addition t i on and in 11 sewer and water. We again. thank the City of Maplewood and the staff personnel for their continued support regarding our housing community in Maplewood. Sincerely, � MARVIN H AND SON CONSTRUCTI N CO. op Frederic E. Haas Vice President Land Development FH /lw b attachment 3 � -3 TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development ,SUBJECT: Tilsen's Maplewood Heights #13 DATE: August 13, 1984 Action by Counc:!.1: Endorse M o dif i e ei ---- -- Re� ect a rl Date The counci 1 considered the prel imi nary plat and six variances for this site on August 13 and directed staff to draft a resolution approving the variances. The resolution is enclosed. Approval of the plat should be sub ject to increasing the right —of -way for Gall Avenue to 60 feet wide, as measured from the south I i ne of Gal l Avenue right —of —way established by Robert Tilsen's Maplewood • Heights No. 10. It is proposed as 59.4 feet as measured from the Tilsen's 10th Addition, Jw Attachments: 1. Plat 2. Resolution C.OU NTY ROAD D C Cn 75 75 79.6 Ln LO Z 2�c ) ern o Cn 1 Ln 9,862 9 - . 7 9.6 Z 4 9,751 9,750 9, 951 N CV o V 79-fa . 75 75 i -- ._ _ i .6 To be dedicated An Requested for .Dea i cation • GALL AVENUE. N ROBERT T is MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS +10 Appl icant's Original Proposal for Robert Tilsen's Maplewood Heights #13 4 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a -re ular m ' , g eeting of the city . l of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Y el council chambers in said city n the 27th day ay of August, 1984 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent. WHEREAS, Tilsen Homes, Inc. applied for a variance for the following- described property: East 150 feet of the West 262.60 feet of the South 297.45 feet of the North 330.45 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 1, Township 29, Range 22, subject to an easement for highway purposes 9 Y p P es over the southerly 3.5 feet thereof. Together with, The west 112.60 feet of the South 297.45 feet of the North 330.45 feet of the Northwest 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 1, Township 29 North, Range '22 West,. subject to McKnight Road and Gall Avenue rights- of -way, This property is also known as 2266 and 2280 E. County Road D ,Maplewood; WHEREAS, sections 36-69 and 30 -8 (f) (1) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires single- dwelling lots to have at least 10,000 square feet area; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing lot one with 9,860 s uare -feet q , lot two with 9,862 square feet, lot four with 9,951 square feet lot five q , e with 9,751 square feet and lot six with 9,750 square feet, requiring variances of 140, 138 49 250 square feet; 249 and q g WHEREAS, Section 30 -8 (f) (2) of city code requires single-dwelling 9 g corner lots to be at least 100 feet wide; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing lot four of Robert Tilsen' s Maplewood Heights #13 to be 79.6 feet wide, requiring a variance of 21.4 feet; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on June 13, 19840 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning ommission on August 6, 1984. The Tannin o 9 planning commission recommended to the city council that said variance be denied. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing n August 13 g 9 , 1984 to consider this variance. Notice thereof was P ublished and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were iven an present opportunity to be heard and 9 p ent written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and lanni n 9 commission.' P NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL tha t -e above- described variance �.ind.�ng�s be approved on the basis of the following `? of fact Ile Strict enforcement of the code would • cause an undue hardship :because of circumstances unique to this ro ert P P Y- 20 The variances meet the spirit and intent of the code, 3. The lots would be in character with the • neighborhood. Adopted this 27th day of August, 1984. :Seconded by Ayes-- :STAT:E OF MINNESOTA ) `COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Maplewood, Minn PP clerk of the City of Ma P , Minnesota,, do hereby certify that I have carefull extract of mi Y compared the attached and foregoing minutes of a regular meeting of the City _of Maplewood, held on the 27th day of August, 1984, with the original on file in. my office, and the same is a full Iran cri t therefrom i true and complete P insofar as the same relates to variance requests. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 198 . City Clerk City of Maplewood E -� MEMORANDUM Action '+ � C c c i 1 To: Barry Evans, City Manager Ender. Ua._,_._. From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Community Service Moaif'ie Subj: Capital Improvement Projects To Be Cancelled Rejecte Date: August 21, 1984 Date The Park and Recreation Commission at their August 20, 1984, meet recommended that the following projects be cancelled at this . time and that funds be returned to their appropriate P.A.C. account: Western Hills Tennis Court Lights - Project 11- 4720 - 345 -81 $500 To Neighborhood Account Tennis Court Lights - Project 11- 4720 - 345 -94 $9 To Commercial Account Kohlman Park Tennis Courts - Project 11- 4720 - 364 -94 $30 To Commercial Account Action by Council: MEMORANDUM Endorse Modified. 'TO: City Hager Ma Rejecte FROM: Director of -Community Development Date SUBJECT: Code Amendment __ Critical Area and Environmental Pro tection • DATE: June 25, 1984 Ordinances Request r 1. Amend the environmental protection ordinanc • e, by consolidating it into one ordinance with the critical area ordinance, 2. Add a requ irement for council ap l to • major slopes P make significant alterat to pes of 25% or more i n grade. Reasons for the Request The city has two similar, but different, environme • ental ordinances governi the critical area, south of Carver Avenue and west of I - 494. ( See ma p on page 10. Counc i 1 adop the state required critical area ordinance n • 1981 • Council l then adopted a city-wide environmental protection ordinance in 1982. The two ordinances should be consolidated to avoid an conf ' wordin 9 y usion caused by conflicting The council considered a consolidated ordinance o September 12, 1983 and requested that the planning commission consider reducing a that can be de g the maximum grade of slope developed from 40 %. A subsequent was ma sloe tour was recommendation of 26°6 P held and a de after it was found that there are no natural si gnificant sl opes in the city of 406 or more • April 16 The planning commission, on A P , reviewed the ordinance and felt that development should o be allowed Staff's recommendation is designed to rotect sig nificant, P natural slopes 25% or more f (See e i n grade, without necessari prohibiting development map on a e 32� for on them. • page l to a 9 l ocation' t i on of these slopes.) opes .) This amendment woul require counc rove the d Pp a grading of each significant gni f i cant slope and determine its importance to the character of the area. In effect, this regulates alteration to the slope and not development. Section 9 -189 already the _maximum d ensity allow guarantees • n the environmental protection ordinance. y ed by the land use plan, regardless of an requirement i r i y q ement Recommendation Approval of the enclosed ordinance. BACKGROUND Past Actions 3 -1 -79: Council adopted a Critical Area Plan and Re ' gul ati ons , subject to Environmental tal Quality Board (EQB) approval . 9- 18 - 80: EQB approved the Maplewood Cri ti cal • Area Plan and regul ations, subject to Maplewood City Counc approval of requested revisions 3 -5 -81: Council approved the Critical Area Plan and r • regulations as condlt�onally approved by the EQB on 9- 18 -80. 12- 13 -82: Council adopted the-Environmental P • Pr otection Ordinance. 7- 14 -83: EQB approved the proposed consolidation of Ma • plewood s Critical Area and Environm ental Protection Ordinances to form the ro osed Environ �tection and Critical Area p p mental Pro . Ordinance. 8 -1 -83: The Planning Commission recommended approval of the consolidation of the ordinances . 9-12-83: The City Council tabled the proposal to study the maximum allowed slope for development. Environmental Qualit y Board (EQB) The Critical Areas Planning Act requires EQB approval f • Q Q pp � any proposed revision to local government critical area plans or regulations. Procedure 1. EQB approval 2. Planning Commission recommendation 3: City Council: first reading at a public hearing second reading and final decision (requires at least four votes in favor for approval) mb Enclosures 1. Ordinance 2, Location Map- -Critical Area 3. Resolution from the EQB 40 Critical Area Ordinance 50 Significant slope map 2 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MAPLEWOOD CODE RELATING TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL . TAL PROTECTION AND CRITICAL CAL AREA ORDINANCES Section 1. Chapter nine of the Cod • • P • cal Area Ordinance e of Ordi nances i s amended to consolidat Critical the 36 -496 through 36 -54 ' 9 9} with the Environmental Protection Ordinance (Sections 9 -186 through -1 1 an ua 9 9 93 } as follows (new language i s underlined and language ua is crossed out): 9 9e to be deleted ARTICLE IX. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND CRITICAL CAL AREA- 8R91aANEE DIVISION 1 GENERALLY Sec. 9 -186. Purpose. The purpose of t h i s ordinance i s to rotec ' p t s f � cant natural features, which (1) Preserve the natural character of neighb orhoods g orhoods (2) Protect the health and safety f resid eats (3) Protect water ual i t q y (4) Prevent erosion or flooding (51 Manage the Mississippi Riv Corridor Critical Area in accordance with th Cri tical Areas Act of 1973, the Minnesota ]973 and the Pol i c Ac e t of Governor's. critical area designation order, Executi Orde 130, dated November 23, 19760 t � .Section 9 - 187. Applicability, This ordinance shall app to a • • Pp y any new subdivision, development or building o be approved by the city counc or community design r • g shall 9 review board. This ordinance not apply to any use permitted on a temporary ba f exceed two ears, when such y s or a period not to y use i s established shed wi thout site re . arati on. P P Section 9 -188. Definitions, 61 uff l i ne - -a line delineating a top of a sloe with • protected P dir drainage to a e percent, water, connecting the points nts a t which the sloe becomes � (More than P ess than e one bluffl ine may be encountered landward from a protected water.- a proceeding P ) Critical Area - -The Mississippi River Corridor Area bounded by Carver Avenue, I -494 and the City limits. Crown Cover- -the ratio between the amount of land shaded ro 'ection of by the vertical p. the branches and foliage iage area of standing trees t of land, usually 9 to he tots area y expressed as a percentage. a 3- I3i r Drainage.:. bra i ns e n nd Q to a protected L-a ter without a � or �tZand n fnterrreninD . Erosion - -th general g process b �fiich s or sub- surface water or oils 8re re•ved b y flowing surface o hind dross Soil Coss - -the BYera oe n .. an total amou of soil from one acre of 1 c y ion nd b eros material carried Lift Station - -a f a c i l i t y . including purl in facil iti sewage or storm wa ter runoff - P 9 es . for the l ifting o . f to a h i g h er sewa a facili t f runoff facility g y or storm wafer Pipel i - -an underground line e of pipe including associated control devices and other structures ups, val Se�+ or other es util ized for conveying li uid finely divided solids from 9 Q s, gtses. m one point to another Protected Wa ter -- forme r1 ref • defined y erred to as public waters. means any • in Minnesota Statutes afl.Y ka ter Sectio 1 05.37. subdivision 14 Retaining structure utilized it ized to hold a slope in WDuld not naturally remain i p position which it S %. -- suspended natter carri by water, s ewage or oth er 1 i quids Slope- -the inclination of the na tural Sl � , n1 des t ural surface of the land fr - y de as a ratio of the om the hors zontal; length to the hei _ ght. . Structure- - anythin manufactured, tured, constructed or erected whi attached to - or. positioned on )a ch is no j. ally land, I ncluding portable structures S ubstation--a ny util it struc ,Y Lure �, other than lines. i el i nes towers P F .holes or Te relatively level area ' bordered on one or .more wore s i des • Wal 1 by a re t a n s ng ?roe -any moody plant, except a shru d P b, that has at least one trunk wh ose diameter is four inches or rooter f °s Q ,, ur feet above the ground Utility Tacil tty -- }, s ical A y facilities of electric, telep te7 television, mater, sans tar 8nd telegraph, cable y storm sewer, solid araste, as s or simi orrice operations 9 1 ar vegetation - -a11 plant ror�t.h 9 , especially trees . shrubs , mosses or r . 9 asses Water Body- -any l ake. st r e am s * . • enm. pond. wetland or river Wetland- -any 1 and which is seasonably wet or flooded. includin all m bogs. tru mps or f1 stns Q arshes, Sec. 9-189. Denstty Guarantee - 4 - 4o I requirement in this article shall prevent the development of property to the maximum density allowed in the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan Update. The city council may require the clustering of dwellings in the form of townhouses, quads or apartments or similar uses, where it is necessary to preserve natural features. Single family homes are not precluded from consideration as part of any proposed development under this ordinance. DIVISION 2, SITE PLANNING REQUIREMENTS Sec.. 9 -190. Site plan required The - appl i cant shal l submit a site plan and any other information needed to determine compliance with this ordinance. Specific requirements shall be stated on an application form in the office of the director of community development. Sec. 9 -191. Site Plan approval standards. No site plan which fails to satisfy the following standards shall be approved: (1) General standards a. The conduct of all grading, landscaping, structure placement, and street routing shall be consistent with and to the maximum extent in the furtherance of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and for develop- ment in the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area, the Maplewood Critical Area Plan. b. The proposed development shall not lessen existing public access to and along a protected water. c. The proposed development shall be designed, constructed and main- tained to avoid causing: 1. Accelerated erosion 2. Pollution, contami nati on - or s i l t a t i o n of water bodies or storm sewers 3. Flooding er- 4nereas4ng -the - storm- wa$Pr- raneff -rate 4. Ground water contamination d. Development shall not substantially diminish the scientific, historical educational, recreational or aesthetic value of unique natural areas and unique pl ant and animal species, which are registered with the State as such, shall not substantially alter the reproductive cycle of the species. e. Views of protected waters from buildings or public streets shall not be by the placement of advertising signs. (2) Slopes a. No development s l be permitted on existing slopes of eighteen percent or greater which are in direct drainage to a protected water. 5 - b. In areas not in direct drainage to a protected water, no development shall be allowed on existing slopes greater than forty percent, C. No development, whether or not in direct drainage to a protected water, shall be permitted on land having an existing slope in excess of twelve percent, unless the applicant proves the following conditions are met: 1. Controls and protections exist uphill l l from the proposed P p p ed development such that there is no danger of structures or streets being struck by falling rock, mud sediment g ment from erosion, uprooted trees or other materials. 2. The proposed development presents no danger of falling rock mud sediment from e • ' erosion, uprooted trees or other materials to structures downhill. 3. The view of a developed slope within the Critical Area from the Mississippi River and opposite river bank is consistent with the natural appearance of the undeveloped slope, consistent with an i stered historic area y state registered s nearby, compatible with the view from historic areas, and compatible with surrounding architectural features. 4. The city engineer may require the developer to provide a soils engineer to certify the stability of atenti:al 1 un P Y t le slopes. d. The basic character of natural s10 es of 25% or more in rade shall 9 not be altered without approval from the city ouncil The council 1 shall ha se their dpr i c i nn nn • 1. The qe ree of alteration of the sloe and 2. The im ortance of the sloe to the character ' of ' the area e. d: All new structures and roads shall be placed no closer than fort feet feet from a bluff line 'Exceptions shall be: E Y _ 1. Public recreation facilities, scenic overlooks, public "observation" platforms or public trail systems 2. The construction of above - ground pumping stations 3. Other development, when the applicant can conclusively demonstrate that construction or final development will not negatively impact Y P sl opes with a grade of ei ghteen ercent or greater P 9 4. All other structures, other than buildings and roadway urfaces retaining • ' but including n i ng walls , shall meet the following owi ng design requirements: a Retaining walls or terrace contours in excess of three feet in height shall' have a fence. , bj Construction materials shall be subject to community design review board approval -- The- e4ty- eewRe41- fay - wa}ve -the The requirements of this section shall not apply in the following situations 1. Where a slope has been substantially altered by prior excavation or filling. f 2:-- Where- a- s}epe -4s- tee- sFRall te - be - s4gn4f4eaet- 2. Where a s lo pe i s l ess than 200 feet i n length (top* bottom) or 500 feet in width side to side . 3. Where earth sheltered homes are proposed. Iff•� (3) Erosion control f-:d soils ae All erosion control. storm aster run -off, util ity and similar structures shall be designed to be maintained and operated without requiring the crossing or operation of heavy maintenan vehicles and equipment, such as bulldozers, trucks and backhoes, on in excess of eight percent, This requirement �y be ua i ved by the ei ty eounci l t�rhhe re there is no other alternative, b. construction shall not I>e allowed where there are soil problems, • including but, not limited to, soil bearing strength, shrink /swell potential or excessive frost movement, unless effective soil correction rte- asures or building constructi Vpethods are approved by the building \ official. ce bevel opment shall be accomplished only in such . a manner that on-site, gross soil loss levels shall not exceed five tons per acre per year during construction, but only * taro tons ;�e r acre per year when the site is adjacent to a water body, water coarse or storm sewer inlet and '0.5 tons per acre pei r year after construction activities are completed, d. A development shal be located to minimize the removal of vegetation and alteration of the natural topography. e. Erosion protection measures shall make raximum use of natural, inplace vegetation, rather than the "placing of new vegetation on the site. (4) Wetlands a, Wetlands and other water bodies shall not * be used as primary sediment traps during construction. b. Filling or construction shall not be allowed in areas proposed for pondi ng in tpe Kapl ewood Drainage Plan, as determined by the city engineer. -c. Filling shall not cause the natural nutrient stripping capacity of the wetland to fall below the nutrient production of the wetland watershed for its projected development. d. Fill must be free of chemical. pollutants and organic wastes. • e. The property owners adjoining a wetland should be given the opportunity 'for an equal apportionment of fi11. (5) Trees a. Development shall be designed to preserve the maximum number of healthy trees. This requirement shall not apply to diseased trees or where a - forester' certifies that thinning is needed for the overall health of a Woodlot; in which case. a specific tree removal plan� m ust be approved by the CI Ve . b. If trees are cut, the densit y of trees shall be restored to that which existed before development, but in no case shall the applicant be !required to raise the - density above ten trees per acre, unless part of A required plentSng scre �.�y trees required red t.o ba' yerled in ecf R '' Planted ratite t P • zhn11 �.xit�ize th o the area. shall not i e use of species epidemic and inclu any species c�nd Shall be h.trdy und&r under disease shall b 't j local conditions. T - erst tw f nches. ree diameters c. nPPI scant shall The d emonstrate that All radin conducted in a canner g II trfiich takes lac " that preserves th r0 p e and stability of exi stin of Zone 8r2 Brea Q trees and provides a anon eQun1 t-o 8t least one -ha � s c rown n adequate �aterin 1 f of each tr g Cover. DIVISION 32' UTILITIES AND STREETS sec. 9 -1920 Utilities. Undergroun 9 d P acinQ of Utilities shall be re technolog wired vale g or l a nd Chara.cteris Q , ss ccanomic n Fc tic factors r -ale underg ' oromic considerations . 9 °und P1 acer��nt Minant regardi fat a1 one shall not be the �- sfbility. aJor defer - (b) Overhead t ros sings of prote . f01 Lowing criteria • �a tens I f required, sh . a17 met the ( The c h • Shall be a dj ac ent t or part of corridor, incl udin brad an ezistin util � S� or Overhead utili Q sty possible. ty lines, t�•�,IneYer (2) All structures utilized shall be as tom e as practical land use and scenic view Patibl views. with (3) .Right- of_va c 1 . y clearance shall be kept to P s minin=. (4) Vegetative screen - in9 shall be utilized to the maxi would be consistent with safety re uirenen that q ts. • (5) Routing shall a vo i d unstable soils* �blu alteration of the na tural en ffl ines or hi ridoe vironment i s• Th minimized. or 1 udi ng gra di n sh all • 9 . 11 be ( 6) The crossings shall 1 be sub forth in this ordinance, t.o the _ site Planning r e q uireme nts set 9 (C) Utility substations - (l) All substations shall be subject to the site plennin sit forth in this ordinnnce, g requirements (2) New substations or refurbfshm� compatible to height, scale. buildingXSaterials , slnndsca final) be st9ntn9 with surrounding natural environment or S by natural c,enns IS encouraged, land uses. Screening �d) Pipelines (1) All prapezee pipelines and crnderflrounQ . to the site planning requfrea,ent fsclll thfs ( 2) These facilities tha11 bt located to srofd wetlands; er�odlands or arms of unstable stilt. - 8 - (3) All underground placing of utilities or pi pel Ines shall be followed by turf establishment. (4) All proposed i el i nes shall be placed at least eight feet d P P P 9 under a creek bed. Section 9 -193. Streets. ' (a) The grades of any streets shall not exceed seven percent, unless there is no feasible alternative as determined by the City Engineer. (b) Roads shall be constructed to minimize impacts on the natural terrain and natural landscape. (c) All roads shall be subject to the site pl anni ng ' requi rements set forth in Section 9 -191. Section 2. Section-c36-496 to 36 -549 (Critical Area ordinance) of the Maplewood Code of ordinances are hereby rescinded. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect after its passage and publication. Passed by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this day of , 1 9840 Mayor Attest: City Clerk Ayes-- Nays-- - 9 - Q v c,Z 3 25 ll N1�OOD AVE. 72 A ML OW DA HL j;: 0 - Ot - T2sN W 1 "' M 7 U7 21 W Y ? AMYL 3 , 72 494 74 HIGMW A 25 • AvE. 70 . r g LAVE. luql 25 ) i SCUTNC S 12 •:! `►' Carver Lake �Ox w00p AVE. Q 49 z 68 72� r o CARv rm AVE ► 0. • 4 A ltm .. _... T26N •� L,� IS R 22 y►------ RVW 29 30 1 •� :i RAMSE CO 494 WASHINGTON CO. LOCATION MAP - 10 - C Attachment Two 4 N STATE OF MINNESOTA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD In\the Matter of the Review of an Amendment to the Plans and Regulations of the City of Maplewood relating to an area within the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 116 (1980) FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER Procedural History The above - entitled matter was brought before the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (the "Board ") on July 14 , 1983 pursuant to Minn. Stat. Ch. 116G (1980) , Rule MEQC 55 (c) (1974) , and section E.1. of the Standards and Guidelines for the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area. Based upon review of the proposed plan and regulations of the City of Maplewood, comments of the Metropolitan Council staff and 'interested agencies, and all other matters of record, the Board makes the following: Findings of Fact 1. Certain areas of the Mississippi River Corridor were designated a critical area under Minn. Stat. Chapter 116G (1980) pursuant to Executive Order No. 130 effective November 23, 19 76 , and continued pursuant to Executive Order No. 79 -19, effective April 11, 1979. The Metropolitan Council, on July 12, 1979, approved the designation of the Mississippi River Critical Area for an indefinite period as provided for in Section 116G.06, Subd. 2(c). 2. The City of Maplewood (the "City ") has planning and regulatory authority over development activities within the. designated critical area. t 3. The City's plans and regulations for the. area have been approved.and adopted by the Board on the 18th day of September 1980. 4. The City has recommended administrative revisions to its original critical area ordinance in order to eliminate unnecessary duplication of regulations within the critical area. The city council will adopt the proposed ordinance when it has been approved by the Board. 6. Staff of the Metropolitan Council and the Board have reviewed the proposed revisions and recommended approval. Conclusions A. The procedures specified by statute, rule and guidelines for the review of proposed plans and regulations for the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area have been complied with. 8. The proposed amendment submitted by the City is consistent with the Executive Order designating the critical area. -1�- Attachment Three Order Based on findings and conclusions contained herein and the entire record in this matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Pursuant to Minn. Stat . Ch. 116G (1980) Rule MEOC 55 (c} , and section E.1. of the Standards and Guidelines, that the proposed amendments to the plans and regulations of the City of Maplewood be approved. Approved and adopted this l4th day of July 1983. Thomas Ka li towski Chairman t - 12 R.. To Bt Pep /e d . 136 -485 MAPLE W OOD CODE 4 onsider the effect of the proposed change upon the to of i . t, and economical extension of public ser s and facilitie , uch as public water, sewers, police ire protec- tion and sch S. (5) Be guided in its st review and r mmendation by sound standards of subdivisio racti here applicable. (6) Impose such conditions, ' a ' ion to those required, as are necessary to assure at the in of this chapter is com- plied with, whic onditions may inc e, but not be limited to, harmoni . design of buildings, plan and its mainte- nance a t or sound screen, the minimize of noxious, offe a or hazardous elements, and adequate s dards of p -ing and sanitation. (Code 1965, §§ 912.080, 915.0 ) cs. 36- 486 -36 -495. Reserved. ARTICLE VIII. AREA OF CRITICAL CONCERN — MISSISSIPPI RIVER CORRIDOR* DIVISION 1. GENERALLY Sec. 36 -496. Findings. The city finds that the Mississippi River Corridor, within the Metropolitan Area, is a unique and valuable local, state, regional and national resource. The river is an essential element in the local, regional, state and national transportation, sewer and water, and recreational systems and serves important biological and ecological functions. The prevention and mitigation of irreversible damage to this resource and the preservation and enhancement of its natural, aesthetic, cultural and historical values is in furtherance of the health, safety and general welfare of the city. (Ord. No. 461, § 918.010 1 ,3-1-79) State law reference —The term "metropolitan area" defined, M.S. § 473.121, subd. 2. *State law reference — Critical areas act of 1973, M.S. §§ 116G.01- 116G.14. 2310 - 13 - Attachment Four I i ZONING 1 36-498 Sec. 36 -497. Purpose and intent. It is the purpose and intent of this article • • to prevent and mitigate irreversible damage to this unique state, local, reg ional and resource, to preserve and enhance national ance its value to the public, and to protect and preserve the system as an essential element in the ci ' transportation, sewer and water cit "s , and recreational systems, in ac- cordance with the following policies: (1) The Mississippi River Corridor shall be managed ' g d as amult- i purpose public resource by conserving the scenic, environ- mental, recreational, mineral, economic, cultural and historic resources and functions of the river corridor and providing for the continuation of development of reside and open P n space uses within the river corridor. (2) The Mississippi River Corridor shall be managed in g a man - n er consistent with its nat characteristics and its existing development, and in accordance with regional lans for went of the P the development Metropolitan Area. (3) The Mississippi River Corridor shall be managed in g accor- dance -with the Critical Area Act of 1973, the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act of 1973, and the Governor's cri cal cal area designation order, Executive Order No. - 130 dated November 19, 1976, and other applicable state and federal laws. (Ord. No. 461 § 918.020, State law references -- Critical areas act of 1973, M.S. §§ 1 16G.01- 116G.14• act establishing a state environmental policy, Laws of Minnesota 1973, Ch. 412- sta environmental policy, M.S. Ch. 116D; the term "metropolitan area" defined M.S. 473.121, subd. 2. § Sec.. 36 -498. Establishment of critical area overlay district. A critical area overlay district, with its attendant regulations, ' art of the zoning is hereby established as P ing ordinance of the city. This district shall overlay existing zoning districts so that an in the overly y parcel of land lying y district shall also lay in one or more of the underlying established zoning districts. Territory within district shall be subject tot he requirements established the by other applicable ordinances and regulations of the city. Within the over lay district, all uses shall be permitted in accord with the re gu- Supp. No.1 �. 23.11 - 14 - 36.498 MAPLEWOOD CODE lations for the underlying zoning district; provided, however, that such uses shall not be entitled to or issued the appropriate devel- opment permit until they have first satisfied the additional require - ments established in this article. (Ord. No. 461, § 918.030 3 -1 -79) Sec. 36 -499. District boundaries. This overlay article shall apply to the critical area district, which is specially delineated on the official zoning map of the city for purposes of determining the application of this article to any par - ticular parcel of land. The above- referenced map shall be on file in the office of the director of community development and shall be available for inspection and copying. (Ord. No. 461, § 918.040 3 -1 -79) Sec. 36 -500. Definitions. For the purposes of this article, the following words, terms and phrases shall have the following respective meanings ascribed to them by this section: Blu ffline• A line delineating a top of a slope with direct drain - age to the Mississippi River or Fish Creek, connecting the points • (More _ - at which the slope becomes less than eighteen (18) percent. . than one bluflline may be encountered proceeding landward from the river). Critical area: Carver Avenue on the north, I -494 on the east, the southerly border of the city on the south, and the westerly border of the city on the west. Crown cover: The ratio between the amount of land shaded by the vertical projection of the branches and foliage area of standing trees to the total area of land, usually expressed as a percentage. Dimensional requirement: Minimum and maximum setbacks, yard requirements, or structure height or size restriction in the zoning ordinance section. Erosion: The general process by which soils are removed by flow- ing surface or subsurface water or wind. Gross soil loss: The average annual total amount of soil material carried from one acre of land by erosion. Supp. Na 1 2312 15 i ZONING 136-500 Lift station: A facility, usually including pumping facilities, for the lifting of sewage or stormwater runoff to a higher sewage facility or stormwater runoff facility. Natural rate of absorption: The amount of stormwater absorbed into the soil during a storm of once in twenty (20) years' occurrence. Park dedication fee: As defined in section .211.010 of the [for - mer] City Code. Person: Any individual, firm, corporation, partnership, associa- tion or other private or governmental entity. Pipeline: An underground line of pipe including associated pumps, valves, control devices and other structures utilized for conveying liquids, gasses, sewage or other finely divided solids from one point to another. Retaining wall: A structure utilized to hold a slope in a position which it would not naturally remain Sediment: Suspended matter carried by water, sewage or other liquids. Septic tank: Any device for the treatment and disposal of human waste which utilizes the percolation of the liquid portion of the waste into the soil, including all portions of said system which are not contained inside a building. _ Slope: The _inclination of the natural surface of the land from the horizontal. Soil: The upper layer of earth which may be dug or plowed; the loose surface material of the earth in which vegetation normally grows. Structure: Anything manufactured, constructed or erected which is normally attached to or positioned on land, including portable structures. Substation: Any utility structure other than lines, pipelines, holes or towers. Terrace: A relatively level area bordered on one or more sides by a retaining wall. ~' Supp. Na 1 2313 - 16 - 36 -500 MAPLEWOOD CODE Tree: Any woody plant that has at least one trunk whose diame- ter, four (4) feet above the ground, is four (4) inches or greater. Utility facility: Physical facilities of electric, telephone, telegraph, cable television, water, sewer, solid waste, gas and similar service operations. Vegetation: All plant growth, especially tree, shrubs, mosses and grasses.. Waterbody: Any lake, stream, pond, wetland or river. Wetland: Any land which is seasonally wet or flooded, including all marshes, bogs, swamps and floodplains. (Ord. No. 461, § 918.050, 3 -1 -79; Ord. No. 503, § 1, 5- 21 -81) Cross reference -­-Rules of construction and definitions generally, 1 1- 41 et seq. Sec. - 36 -501. rxisting structures. Structures in the city within the critical area as of March 1, 1979, the location, or the use of which, is inconsistent with this article or the Governor's critical areas designation order shall not be eligible for any permit granted by the city for expansion, change of use, renewal of existing permit or building permit, unless the following .criteria are met: (1) The applicant shall provide and maintain adequate screen- ing of 'the structure from the water through the use of natural vegetative means. (2) The public's ability to view the river and river corridor from existing public streets shall not be further degraded by the proposed activity. (Ord. No. 461, § 918.140,3-1-79) Sec. 36 -502. Signs. All signs in the city within the critical area shall comply with the following provisions: (1) All advertising signs permitted within the critical area shall conform with the provisions of article III of this chapter. (2) Views of the water from vistas and public roads shall not be impaired by� the placement of business or advertising signs. Supp No. 1 14 23 .- _ 17 _ ZONING 136-614 (3) All advertising signs, the location of which is not in confor- mance with this section, are. deemed nonconforming uses and shall be removed within three (3) years of the effective date of this section (March 1, 1979). (Ord. No. 461, § 918.150, 3 -1 -79) Secs. 36- 503 -36 -514. Reserved. I%k- Supp. Na 1 2314.1 _ 18 _ ,w • ZONING 936-518 DIVISION 2. SITE PLANS Sec. 36 -515. Required. ' -- No building permit, zoning approval or subdivision approval per - mit or certificate shall be issued for an p ro p erty, y p p e rty, or improvement thereon or use thereof, located in an area covered by this article, until a site plan has been prepared and approved in accordance with the provisions of this article. (Ord. No. 461, § 918.070, 3 -1 -79) Sec. 36 -516. Exceptions.. (a) No site plan shall be required in the critical area within the city for an existing single - family dwelling nor for the extension, enlargement, change or alteration thereof, nor accessory structures thereto; provided that, the dwelling remains a single - family dwelling. (b) No site plan shall be required in the critical area within the city for any use permitted on a temporary basis for a period not to exceed two (2) years, when such use is established without site preparation and makes no discharge onto the site. No extensions j shall be granted beyond the two (2) year temporary permit (Ord. No. 461, § 918.080, 3 -1 -79) Sec. 36 -517. Site plan application. A written application for site plan approval under this article shall be filed with the director of community development contain - ing evidence adequate to show that the proposed use will conform to the standards set forth in this article. Three (3) sets of clearly legible blue or black lined copies or drawings, and required informa- tion, shall be submitted to the director of community development and shall be accompanied by an application fee in an, amount im- posed, set, established and fixed by the city council, by resolution, from time to time. (Ord. No. 461, § 918.090 3 -1 -79) Sec. 36 -518. Contents. (a) Site plans required by this article shall be prepared to a scale appropriate to the size of the project and suitable for the review to be performed. .�. / 2315 t 19 - t . 136 -518 M"LEWOOD CODE (b) The following information shall be provided in the site plan: (1) Location of the property, including such information as the name and numbers of adjoining roads, railroads, existing subdivisions or other landmarks. 2 The name and address of the owner or developer, the section, township and range, north - point,. date and scale of drawing, and number of sheets. (3) Existing topography, as indicated on a contour map having a contour interval no greater than two (2) feet per contour. The topographic map shall also clearly delineate any bluffline, all streams, including intermittent streams and swales, waterbodies, statement of water quality and a classification given to the waterbc.3y by the Minnesota department of natural resources and the Minnesota pollution control agen- cy, if any. The topographic map shall indicate the floodway or flood fringe lines. O 4 A plan delineating existing drainage of the water setting forth in which direction the -volume and at what rate storm water is conveyed from the site, and setting forth those areas of the site where storm water collects and is gradually perco- lated into the ground or slowly released to stream or lake. (5) A description of the soils of the site, including a map indicat- ing soil types, by areas, to be disturbed, as well as a soil report prepared by a soil scientist containing information on the suitability of the soils for the type of development pro- posed osed and for the type of sewage disposal proposed, and describing any remedial steps to be taken by the developer to render the soils suitable. All areas proposed for grading shall be identified by soil. type, both as to soil type of existing topsoil and soil type of the new contour. The location and extent of any erosion area shall be indicated. The stability of rock units along blufflines shall be included in the soils description. (6) A description of the flora and fauna, which occupy the site or are occasionally found thereon, setting forth with detail those areas where unique plant or animal species may be found on the site. 2316 - 20 - - _ 2 _ . _ ZONING 536-518 (7) A description of any features, buildings or areas which are of historic significances. (8) A map indicating proposed finished grading, shown at con - • ___ tours at the same intervals as provided above, or as required to clearly indicate the relationship of proposed changes to existing topography and remaining features. (9) A landscape plan drawn to an appropriate scale, including _ dimensions, distances and the location, type, size and de- - scription of all existing vegetation, clearly locating and de- Scribing any vegetation proposed for removal and all pro- posed landscape materials which will be added to the site as part of the development. (10) A proposed drainage plan of the developed site delineating in which direction the volume, and at what rate, storm water will be conveyed from the site and setting forth the areas of • the site where storm water will be allowed to collect and gradually percolate into the ground or be slowly released to stream or lake. The plan shall also set forth the hydraulic capacity of all drainage structures to be constructed or exist- ing structures to be utilized, including volume of holding _ - ponds and storm sewers. (11) An erosion and sedimentation control plan indicating the type, location and necessary technical information on con - trol measures to be taken, both during and after construc- tion, including a statement expressing the calculated antici- pated gross soil loss expressed in tons /acre /year, both during and after construction. (12) The proposed size, alignment, height and intended use of any structures to be erected or located on the site. - (13) A clear delineation of all areas which shall be paved or sur- faced, including a description of the surfacing material to be used. (14) A description of the method to be provided for vehicular and pedestrian access to the proposed development and public access to the river or public river view opportunities, both before and after development; and a description of the de- velopment's impact -on existir. views of and along-the river. Supp. No.1 2317 _ 2 _ . �j �j 136 -518 MAPLEWOOD CODE (15) A description of all parking facilities to be rovided P as part of the development of the site, including an analysis of P ark - ing needs generated by the p d development A delineation of the area or areas to b • e dedicated for public use. (17) A delineation of the location and amounts of excav soils to be stored on the site during construction. (18) Any other information pertinent to the e particular project which, in the opinion of the director of community develop- ment or applicant, is necessary ary or helpful for the review of the project. (c) The director of community development ma waive an of y y the above requirements that are not applicable. (Ord. No. 461 918.060, 918.090 9) 3 -1 -7 ' §§ Sec. 36-519 -Approval—Generally; appeal. The director of community development shall a r v applications f PP o e or deny all a PP or site plan approval under this article, except those that would normally need approval by the city council. If the a • PPI� cant is not satisfied with the decision of the director of community development, the decision may be appealed pp to the city council after a recommendation from the planning commission. (Ord. No. 461 918.100, 3 -1 -79 ' § ) Sec. 36 -520. Same — Standards. No site plan which fails to satisfy he fo llowing fy Ilowing standards shall be approved by the city council or director of communit devel- opment. (1) No development shall be permitted on ' P slopes of eighteen (18) percent or greater which are in direct drainage to the Mississippi River Bluffs or Fish g Creek. (Refer to map on file with the director of community development.) (2) In areas not in direct drainage to the Mississip River Bluffs or Fish Creek no development opnaent shall be allowed on slopes greater than forty (40) percent. (Refer to ma file with the director of community P on . ty development.) (3) No development, whether or not in direct drainage to the Mississippi River Bluffs or Fish g Creek, shall be permitted Supp. Na 1 2318 22 - . f. Any lift stations required to service the slope devel- opment with local sewer systems are designed in ac- cordance with local design standards and approved by the city engineer. The applicant shall furnish a satis- factory arrangement or agreement by which the cost of maintenance and operation of the life station are borne by those serviced by the facility. Supp. Na 1 2319 ZONING 36-520 on land having a slope, before alteration, in excess of twelve (12) percent unless the applicant proves the following con- ditions are met: a. The foundation and underlaying material of an y struc- ture, including roads, shall be adequate for the slope condition and soil type. b. Adequate controls and protections exist uphill from the proposed development such that there is no danger of structures or roads being struck by falling rock, mud, uprooted trees, or other materials. c. The proposed development presents no danger of fall - ing rock, mud, uprooted trees, or other materials to structures downhill. d. The view of the developed slope from the river and opposite riverbank is consistent with the natural ap- pearance of the undeveloped slope, consistent with any historic areas nearby, compatible with the view from historic areas, and compatible with surrounding ar- chitectural features. To the maximum, extent possible, the' use of natural devices, including vegetation man- agement shall be preferred over the construction of artificial devices, including culverts, holding ponds, walls, and terracing. e. All other structures other than buildings and roadway surfaces, but including retaining walls shall meet the following design requirements: 1. Retaining walls or terrace contours shall not ex- ceed five (5) feet in height; 2. Construction materials shall be subject to com- munity design review board approval; 30 The minimum space in between terraces and re- taining walls shall be twenty (20) feet. • . - 23 - 1 36-520 MAPLE W OOD CODE g. No septic tank shall be placed on a slope of greater than twelve (12) percent. The natural slope may not be altered in any way where the septic tank system or part thereof is to be located. The drain lines shall be located parallel to contour lines. (4) The applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed devel- opment shall be planned, designed, constructed and main- tained to avoid substantial probabilities of: a. Accelerated erosion. b. Pollution, contamination, or siltation of water bodies, rivers and streams. c. Damage to vegetation. d. Injury to wildlife habitats. e. Increased flood potential. L Decreased groundwater recharge. (5) The applicant shall demonstrate that the types and densi- ties of land use proposed shall be suited to the site and soil conditions and shall not present a threat to the mainte- nance of the groundwater quality, a potential increase in maintenance costs of utilities, parking areas, or roads, and shall not be subject to problems due to soil, limitations, including, but not limited to, soil bearing strength, shrink/swell potential, and excessive frost movement. (6) All new structures and roads shall be placed no closer than forty (40) feet from a bluffline. Exceptions shall be: a. Public recreation facilities, scenic overlooks, public "ob- servation" platforms, or public trail systems. b. The construction of above- ground pumping stations for sewer lines, such stations shall be screened from view from the river. c. Other development, when the applicant can conclu- sively demonstrate that neither construction of final development will negatively impact slopes with a grade of eighteen (18) percent or greater. (7) Development shall be accomplished only in such a manner that on -site gross soil loss levels shall not exceed five (5) Supp. No.1 2320 ow 24 . C C 1 r' • 3 ZONING 36-520 tons Fe acre per r 3' ear during construction, but only two (2) tons Pe r acre per year when the site is adjacent to a water body or water course and five - tenths ton per acre per year after construction activities are completed. (8) Development shall not substantially diminish the scientif- ic historical, educational, recreational or aesthetic value of natural areas and unique plant and animal species, an shall not substantially alter the reproductive cycle of the species. (9) Erosion protection measures shall make maximum use - of natural in -place vegetation rather than the placing of new veg etation on site as erosion .control facilities. The use of ve g ` natural erosion control devices shall be preferred to the maximum extent over the construction of artificial drain - age devices including culverts, holding ponds, and ditches. (10) The development shall be located in such a manner as to minimize the removal of vegetation and alteration of the natural topography. ; (11) The applicant shall demonstrate that there are no feasible or P rudent alternatives to cutting trees on the site. Devel- F o went shall be permitted only in such a manner that the maximum number of trees shall be preserved. No trees may be cut except those occupying the actual physical space in which a structure, drive or roadway is to be erect - ed. In the event that solar collection is utilized, trees may be cut to allow sufficient sunlight to the solar collectors if the applicant can demonstrate there are no feasible or prudent alternatives. If trees are cut, the density of trees shall be restored to that which existed before development . but in no case shall the applicant be required to raise the density bove ten (10) trees per acre. The applicant shall � takes demonstrate that all grading which lace will be p conducted in a manner that preserves the roof zone aera- tion and stability . of existing trees and provides an ade- quate uate watering area equal to at least one -half of each tree's crown cover. r supp Na 1 2321 - 25 - r • 136-520 MAPLEWOOD CODE (12) Development in woodlands shall not reduce the existing crown cover greater than fifty (50) percent and shall be conducted in such a manner that the understory and litter _ is preserved. (13) Fishing in a wetland shall not exceed the excess storage and nutrient stripping capacities of the wetland based on the ultimate projected development of the wetland water - shed. Flood storage and nutrient stripping capacities shall be calculated in accordance with Appendix B in the Ma- plewood Critical Area Plan. (14) Wetlands and other water bodies shall not be used as primazy sediment traps during or after construction. (15) The proposed development will not increase the runoff' rate or decrease the natural rate of absorption of storm water.. (16) The quality of water runoff' and water infiltrated to the water table or aquifer shall be as high after development as it was before development of the site. (17) When filling in a wetland, a minimum amount of filling may be allowed when necessary but in no case shall the following restrictions on total amount of filling be exceed- _ ed. Since the total amount of filling which shall be per - mitted is limited, the city, when considering permit ap- plications, shall consider the equal apportionment of fill opportunity to reparian land owners. a. Total filling shall not cause the total natural flood storage capacity of the wetland to fall below the pro - jected volume of runoff from the whole developed wet- -land watershed generated by a six -inch rainfall in twenty -four (24) hours. Any increase in runoff' must be detained from on -site infiltration through the soil to the water table. b. Total filling shall not cause the total natural nutrient stripping capacity of the wetland to fall below the nutrient production of the wetland watershed for its projected development. c. Only fill free of chemical pollutants and organic wastes may be used. Supp. Na 1 2• 322 __ --26_ x, z, t; t; ^ 4 36 -531 MAPLEWOOD CODE _ p g r round placing of the utility facility shall be required, (a) Unde g unless economic, technological and land characteristic fac- make underground placement infeasible. Economic con - to rs P siderations alone shall not be made the major determinant regarding feasibility. • • (b) O y Overhead utility crossings, if required, shall meet the follow- . ing criteria. 1 The crossings shall be adjacent to or part of an existing O g utilit y corridor, including bridge or overhead utility lines. 2 All structures utilized shall be as compatible as practi- cable with land use, scenic views and existing transmis- sion structures in height, material, color and design. O g 3 Right-of-way clearance shall be kept to a minimum. (4) Vegetative screening shall be utilized to the maximum extent consistent with safety requirements. (5) Routing shall avoid unstable soils, blufflines or high ridges, and the alteration of the natural environment, including grading shall be minimized. (6) The crossings be subject to the site planning require- ments set forth in section 36 -515 of this article. Utility substations shall be subject to the following standards: (1) All substations shall be subject to the site planning re- quirements uirements set forth in section 36 -515 of this article. 2 New substations or refurbishment of existing substa- tions shall be compatible in height, scale, building ma- terials, landscaping and signing with surrounding natu- ral environment or land uses. Screening by natural means is encouraged and should be compatible with the sur- rounding environment. Pipelines and underground utility facilities shall be subject to the following standards: (1) AH pipelines and underground facilities shall be subject to the site planning requirements set forth in section 36- 515.of this article. (2) The facilities shall be located to avoid wetlands, wood- lands and areas of unstable soils. Supp. Na 1 • 2324 28 M r ZONING J 36-546 (3) All underground placing of utility facilities and pipe- lines shall be followed by revegetation and rehabilita- tion to the conditions which existed on -site prior to development, providing the original conditions were en- vironmentally and aesthetically desirable. (Ord. No. 461, § 918.120 3 -1 -79) Sec. 36 -532. Roads. New roads crossing the critical area corridor or routed within the critical area corridor shall meet the following standards: () a Roads shall be constructed to minimize impacts on the natu- ral terrain and natural landscape. (b) Extreme cuts and fills are to be avoided. (c) All roads shall be subject to the site planning requirements set forth in section 36 -515 of this article. (d) New roads shall not utilize the river corridor as a convenient right -of -way for new arterials. e New roads shall be restricted to those facilities needed to gain access to existing and planned residential uses. (Ord. No. 461, § 918.130, 3 -1 -79) Secs. 36- 533 -36 -545. Reserved. DIVISION 4. INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS Sec. 36 -546. Purpose and intent e following regulations ations in this division are adopted for the Th critical area within the city to: (1) Regulate individual sewage disposal systems so as to prevent contamination of underground bodies of water, streams or other surface bodies of water. r (2) Prevent individual sewage disposal systems from creating a health hazard. or a nuisance for the general public or for individuals. (Ord. No. 461, § 918.160,3-1-79) Supp. Na 1 2325 29 ' 1 36-547 MAPLEWOOD CODE _ Sec. 36 7 547. General requirements. ' The guidelines set forth in 6MCAR4.8040 (formerly VTPC 40) z shall serve as the minimum standards and criteria for the design, _ - location, installation, use and maintenance of individual sewage treatment systems. (Ord. No. 461, 918.170, 3 -1 -79; Ord. No. 503, § 3, 5- 21-81) Sec. 36 -548. Maintenance requirements. (a) At least once a year, the owner of any septic tank . or his agent shall measure or arrange for measurement of the depth of sludge and "scum in such septic tank. When, as a result of such measure- ment, the top of the sludge layer in the tank or any compartment of the tank is found to be less than twelve (12) inches below the bottom of the outlet baffle or submerged pipe, or if the top of the scum layer is* less than three (3) inches below the bottom of the septic tank outlet baffle or submerged pipe, the Owner or agent shall { arrange for the removal and sanitary disposal of sludge and scum from the tank; provided that, such requirement for measuring shall be waived for any septic tank which is cleaned, as indicated, at least once each calendar year. (b) At least once each year, the owner of any individual sewage _ disposal system equipped with a distribution box shall arrange for the opening of the distribution box and the removal of any settled solids therein. Such material shall be disposed of to the septic tank or by acc other means table to the city. p (c) At least once between May first and June thirtieth of each year, the depth of liquid in each seepage pit shall be measured. When, as a result of such measurement it is found that the liquid - level in the pit is less than one foot below *the inlet, a second mea- surement shall be made eight (8) to twelve (12) hours after the first measurement, during which time no liquid shall be discharged to F the seepage pit. If, as a result of the second measurement, it is found that the liquid level in the pit has not lowered at least two (2) feet during the indicated period of time, an additional seepage pit or other acceptable soil absorption system shall be provided. r (d) Servicing of septic tanks and soil absorption units shall con- form to the Minnesota commissioner of health and Minnesota pol- s; N T. 3upp. No. I 2326 F f F t� ff1 3 C i i E t R x , -561 ZONING 136 lution control agency specifications. Disposal of sludge and scum removed from the system shall be: (1) Into a municipal sewage disposal system where practicable. ' (2) In the absence of a public sewer, at a disposal site approved by the state pollution control agency. (3) Sludge shall not be discharged into any lake or water- course, nor upon land without burial. (Ord. No. 461, § 918.180 3 -1 -79) Sec. 36-549. Alternative systems. Alternative methods of sewage disposal to individual sewage disposal systems, such as holding tanks, electric or gas incinera- tors, biological or tertiary treatment plants or land disposal sys- tems, wherever required or allowed in particular circumstances, shall be subject to the standards, criteria, rules and regulations of the Minnesota commissioner of health and Minnesota pollu- tion control agency, and shall also require approval of the city council. (Ord. No. 461, § 918.190, 3 -1 -79) Secs. 36-550- 36,560. Reserved. RTICLE IX. SHOREIAND OVERLAY DIST Sec. 36-5 Purpose and intent. (a) It is the p ose of this article provide for the wise utilization of shorela eas, in or to protect water quality, the natural characteristic d al appeal of protected waters, the local tax base, and the ra . health, safety and welfare of community residents. (b) Enactment of t article is prove mechanism to reduce the negative efl'e of shoreland overcro g, such as water pollution, ina uate space on lots for drain and sanitary facilities, fl damages, and degradation of the ae etic appeal • references— Environmental protection, 9 -186 et seq.; areas of con , 136-496 et seq. • Su p. Na 1 2327 1 . 31 - • s • .r . C G a E i a' G M 1 - K a n , _ . _ - �«R{ w u 4 &09 « . ...- ,i• +.v.�e! ..tariAS -- - - - ,� y �iZ _ 3a2Q w silo ft ..,.r . : � ' t -fit•- i� -" D •� �•/� •- i+`._ _ 4- . � _ _ , � / 1 •mss, �rw� �,.�5 - - � �� .:. '� � M r c, w dam ?� ,, _r J. d �� O .• + , ��r � I�La� aAC i : !•!- � .i l�f' , J_ � -' ! Yet zoog Iq 91 098, jai _ TT •- •��� • �i �. �. . t • - ± ' .ir AIL 2400h • r- � -`'- a•"� • „: \ �� = .� -�►. - - -per ,,,c,, . - i -4L j:i .� Q. t•� �.. _i•• - •� �• � T ��irQ �_ar..t� / �1� � �J : a�+�•a�._'r"� - 3 a ; wr +�� r .s � � 0 M SO t - �:w r' f `, �_ �: +�-. 3:•+ Jul ~� ? s f t w �• . M ••1•.grs • Y ! ` V �.�• ! 'M. ' tf� +�.•. �.�L♦ 1 • w��t T -- r • - - y Y �., - - • J •� o. � . mil« � �� r► � 't' � -� { ` !'^` !�. ! ��, ..1. s • r's.� _fit. • �1r�s.,c: 33: -+ t_ra -a�r� f �•�-• r -�.._ rte= S �� •♦ •r� :F� «• I +- _ -.•. ,�' 1.�� .r • «ICY w f • ��' % yx ' C ♦ ` S , }�: ..� j • ,.-.• 1 •+ i ! • S .► Jti_ �� ` t r 4 s - .+ • -ui!t- trr•i i! __ i.�• '' L�'T' :_a�c -� _ r Lac ._.. a � R •aY� R •'•tub �' 'w � � . j • .�..±. 1`.. ' INVENTORY OF NATURAL, UNDEVELOPED SLOPES u, o Pf / ' . -tom '� •3 GREATER THAN 2596 OF GRADE fat AT LEAST 200 IN LENGTH AND 500 IN WIDTH � :`w3 �: `�` pi now ” •__� .ids• u•.S� �•_ ,t om. � � + 7 y ♦ r w'r K wi L '� •:�i 1( L � ZI20184 SIGNIFICANT SLOPE MAP Attachment 5 4 N — 32 — K' IX.. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Am ]Envi ronmental Protection/Critical ti cal . Area Ordi nance Secretary Olson said the tannin P g commission reviewed this at their meeting, f cs t The commission discussed the proposed ordinance and what slop wo uld be affected by this ordinance. P u7d Commi ssi.oner Fischer move th �__- _e�.pl a ns? commi ssion recommend to the cou 1 ap proval of the proposed envi ronmen - - - -� city tal_p /critical area ordinance. -- - - - - -- - _ Commissioner Pellish seconded Axdahl. Barrett, Fischer, yes -- Commissioners scher Larson, Pellish, Robens, Whitcomb X. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS A. Council meetings of July 9 and Jul 23,1984 XI. STAFF PRESENTATIONS XI ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 8:55 . m P . 8 8 -6 -84 i '' - • J� MEMORANDUM Action by Council: TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Code Amendment-- Rezoning with Platti indorsed 9 g Modifie DATE: Ju 5, 1984 ReJecte Date Request Amend the section of the code requiring an automatic rezoning from F, farm , to R -1, single dwelling when a property is platted to requiring that the city initiate a rezoning at the developer's request. Reason for the Request It is the opinion of the ci attorney s office that a rezoning cannot be done automatically. State statutes require a public hearing and specific action by the council. Comments The enclosed ordinance requires the city to ini tiate a rezoning from F to R -1, if a developer so requests, upon making an application for a preliminary plat. Hearings for the rezoning and preliminary plat would be held together to avoid any delays. Recommendation Approval of the enclosed ordinance. jw Attachment: ordinance 0 ORDINANCE NO. jr AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING THE REZONING OF PLATTED LAND THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 30 -10 is hereby amended to read as follows (deletions crossed out and additions underlined): Sec. 30 -10. Res } dent} al - zeRlRg aRless etherwlse spee regbested R -1 rezoning with plattip dRless - a - speE4f4E _ reguest - 4s- reeelved -with- the- flRal- plat - fer- the zeRiRg - ef ert arts -ef- the- preperty- there }R -irate ether- elass }f }Eat eRs the p re p � y -er- deserlbed -4R- the zeRlRg erdlRaRee - ef - the elty; the e eeaRe - sha ll iatel - -e 9R- the- reEerd Rg- of -such- plat;- pr�eeeed- te- rezeRe all -ef -the 4FAfed y� p latted- area as -R -l- Res }deRee 9 }str �S swell. prepe�ty p re �R - the p ert - --lt - farther- prevlded- that- rcequ4remeRts fer alterlRg ZeRiRg p y etas 's4f4eatleRS3- as- prevlded -4R- the- zen4ng Bede -ef- the- e4ty;-i - hereby wave d - with - rtes p eet te sweh reeeRtly- platted - area: - (cede- 19653- §1884.. -97 93 The city 11 initiate a rez to R =1, Residence District (Single Dwell- i ng) with a prelimi p lat a pl i cati on for land zone F, Farm Residence, when requested by the applicant. Section 2. Section 36 -52 is hereby amended to read as follows (deletions crossed out and additions underlined): Sec. 36-52. Adtefat4e- rezeR 4Rg- eR - p1att - - - areas - -� pen-belR - latted shall- aate�at4ea 4ly •A�l Fars Res�deREe 8 }str }Et p 9 p ass -R -l- Res} dence- 9lstr4et- �S4ngle Dwell areas: -- if - beEe�e -• El `lf 4eatleR -1 s- te- be- jade- wlthlR -sweh -plat; - the- regelatr- preeedure -fer class rc zeR4R revlded -4R- this - chapter- shall- be- fellewed. Cede- 19653- § 9}2 e g3 -as- p e� 93 The initiate a rezoning to R -1, Residence District ( Si n le Dwell - cat shall i n wi th a preliminary plat application for land zoned ' F, Farm Res i dence , when re uested by the app licant Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon i passage and publication. - Passed by the city council of the City of Maplewood, this • day of , 1984. Mayor Attest: . City Clerk Ayes - Nays - D, Code Amendment: Rezoning • ng With Platting Secreta Olson said -the proposal is to amend the section of the code requiring automatic rezoning from t to R -1 when ui re the ci ty - the property i platted - to require y i n i ti ate a rezoning at the developer's request, q est. The commi ss i on , quest i oned if the proposed changes meet approval of th city attorney's office, e .Secretary Ol son indicated y es. Commissioner *Whitcomb m oved the 1 . cou ncil a roval - --- - - -- P arms ng comma ssion recommend to the city the PP of p roposed ordinance. Commissioner Fischer seconded Axdahl, Garrett Fischer, Ayes—Commissioners ss � oners scher, Larson, Pel l i sh, Robens, Whitcomb 7 8 -6 -84 MEMORANDUM _,T0_0 City .Manager FROM °: Associate Planner -- Johnson SUBJECT: Street Vacation LOCATION: 1792 Ruth Street APPLICANT /OWNER: Gregory L. Huppert DATE: August 9, 1984 SUMMARY Request .Action by Council: Endorse Modified Re j ected dl. Date Vacate Ripley Avenue lying between Ruth Street and the Mounds Park Academy property ' Proposal The applicant wants to construct a dog kennel within the thir ty -foot setback from this right -of -way or on the ri ht -of -wa 9 y Comments There is no public purpose to justify re • taming this portion of Ripley Avenue right -of -way. The property to the east has adequate access from . enteur Avenue q om Beebe Road and Lar P It is of no value as access to Goodrich .Park because a wetland is located to the north of the right-of-way. g ay. It would also be impractical to improve this right-of-way rade and 10 because of the steep q cation of tennis courts directly to the east. Vacation would result in the south 33 feet of the right-of-way g ay being transferred to the applicant as well as the elimination of an unnecessary setback requirement. Recommendation Approval of the attached resolution (page 6) , approving the vacation PP g cation of Ripley Avenue between Ruth Street and the Mounds Park Academy property. BACKGROUND • ell Description An unimproved portion of street right -of -way, 66 feet wide. and 135.feet in length. Surrounding Land Uses North: Goodrich Park East: Mounds Park Academy South: the applicant's single- dwelling property West: an unimproved portion of Ripley Avenue Past Actions 9- 26 -74: Council denied a request from the applicant to vacate the south half of this right -of -way. The north half would have .been retained for unspecified public purposes. There are no reasons given in the minutes for denial of this request. Council did, however, advise the applicant to seek a setback variance described in the 12 -12 -74 action. 12- 12 -74: Council approved an eighteen -foot setback variance so that the applicant "could build his home twelve. feet from the Ripley Avenue .right -of -way. V%I - - i -- 1. Land use plan designation: RL, residential lower density 2. Zoning: Rl, single dwelling residence 3. Compliance with land use laws: Section 412.851 of State - Statutes allows a city to vacate any interest in property, when - the council makes a finding that "it appears to be in the public interest to do so," Public Works There are no utilities located within the right -of -way. 1. Planning commission recommendation 2. Council decision following a public hearing jW Attachments 1. Location map OfqLmAN AVE. C E AGE NIJ- RD. .j z DEMON AV ROOK AVE AV ii tt, AVE. o I SEXT NT AVC. GO VAIS RVAI --- AVE. COURT 0 6NDVIEW E 36 E XST E AV SHE RR-EN AVE :: E a E N 'AVE AVE r 0 E AVE. 4. e DU KE LARK LAR AVE. I, 0-: v JLAURIE J RD. z w z SAN Z-1 AvE. @ z t :�� 25 h Q 1..._ --=� AVE 6.. A ,11Z AV E. A V VE o // rRD, 7 C L 7,1 @ Z 64 7 E=7, 7 ,wj AVE. PUBLIC WORKS > BLDG. AVE tin 64 / : �..� I �A 4 4 6 D 4A Otis 9 AVE. AVE R 0S, 1woop AVE. J,.1 All r �► 0 29 . A& 0 11 J Li 0 A* � � N 7 LA I lt J4 - R loge Wok efield W 4 4C 49 t: 29 Lok e x tv'E V' w z z z 39 1 v J (96 A IE, rr InFl. lgf l 65 ST. PAU L = 2640 N. 2400 N. 2160 N. STANICH CT. nnnn MOLLOV i 68 Z 0—M-0 L— —L —0v RI PLEY AVE. 0 R P AN LOCATION MAP 0 Attachment 1 4 `A d - -_-- - r.� za n a t� a a a ,a n_Q ra a r� r1 _ E WA c t IPL .0 W R3 . IV ;i1C3�[���ICIT7TJ ©II1 Q •� ^ I too Di D .. � •i ICI Goodri ct Ball Field� • �•. 13 R1 El -0 v qb *a U , S • - 199 ♦ `�Y AVE. 7s 56 A V.E. Mounds Paris 1 iri 41 Atoda , pt-- I T J i X • • • • r _ IL ri IL dw • . • . •t •. • ' 0-0 . . • . • I • LARP PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 Attachment 2 rn _t.•:.. .. �.s _....��.+k. +s+''t..a.:s- ...�.� .. ......n:. i......iw...a . _s r �.w _ u _ � - �...r -•Y µ�i.•.w'Ja�.�Wr.l i'4J bra amt. [�.rr.•`•4+�14f� ►w Y'R �i,ur -K.L. .... .'G�� . N._ �!. _..rr . -. .. .. .. ... ... b�.... .. -.� ..• ... � ... � .. L d Q t C. z�cc C�- -c 1 L_ ff Cl r-,, (7 6k (bo J 4D C D r • Al'I 1 f i -xc C..�c_C' v U k-A- C,� OC� —Ilk 5 Attachment 3 V pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City -Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of , 1984 at 7 p.m. 'The following members were present: The following members were absent. WHEREAS, Gregory Huppert initiated proceedings to vacate the public .interest in the following described real property: That part of Ripley Avenue right-of-way lying north of lot one, block two, Stanich Highlands WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. This vacation was initiated by Gregory Huppert on August 3, 1984; 2. A majority of the owners of property abutting said street right - of -way have signed a petition for this vacation; 3. Thi-s vacation was reviewed by the planning 'commission on August 20, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that this vacation be 4. The city council held a public hearing on , 1984 to consider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above described street right -of -way, public interest in the property will accrue to the following described abutting properties: 1. Lot 1, block 2, Stanich Highlands 29 Subject to streets and avenues and easements and right -of -way and except part of the N 1/2 of the SW 1/4 southeasterly of N. St. Paul Road and southwesterly of Hazel Street and except the W 810 feet of the N 1/2 of the SW 1/4 and except the W 810 feet of the S 235 8/10 feet of the S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 and except the W 870 feet of the S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 lying north of said S 235 8/10 feet the N 1/2 of the SW 1/4 and S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 all in Section 14, Township 29, Range 22 (Goodrich Park - Ramsey County). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood City Council that it is in the public interest to grant the above - described vacation on the basis of the following findings of fact: ' Attachment 4 1. That retention of this right -of -way would not serve a P ubl is purpose. T, 2. The property owner to the south is unnecessarily y restricted from improving the north thirty feet of his property due to a front and setba ck requirement from this right -of -way. y Adopted this day of , 19 8 4 . Seconded by Ayes-- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD } 1, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify hat I have carefully ly compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1984 with the original on file in my office and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the - P • same relates to the vacation of this street right =of -way. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city th i s P y day of , 1984. City Clerk 40 The applicant wants to record a mortgage in Se i September for the house being ng constructed on this property. The mortgage cannot be recorded for a property smaller than the entire parcel (page 6) without city approval roval of a lot division. Approval of a final plat for the entire (page development a e 7 ) cannot be accomplished by September. P 50 The applicant will request preliminary plat approval for the southerly part of the site (page 7) together with the property to the west, in the near future. Comments The need for this variance is due to circumstances uni q ue to this site and the timing of the request. The only acceptable access to the undeveloped property to the south is from Cypress Street. (See public works comments.) If the proposed lot were to be increased to the depth necessary to meet the required minimum lot area it would double front on the future street to run southwest from Cypress Street (page 7) . Double- fronting lots should be avoided because of the ina improvement bility to assess the total cost of future im p along one of these frontages. They are also prohibited, by code, unless there is no other acceptable alternative. For these reasons, approval of this request would be- in the public interest. The need for this variance . is also a result of the timing f the lot division. The variance would • d not be necessary if the applicant were to plat the entire at one time. However, as stated in item four above the applicant has no choice but to request a lot split at this time o� q P Code MEMORANDUM .w TO City Manager FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson Action by Council, SUBJECT: Lot. Area Variance LOCATION: 1000 East County Road C Endorsed... APPLICANT/OWNER: Patrick Goff Modified DATE: August 15, 1984 Rejecte Date SUMMARY Request Approval of an area variance for a sin le- dwellin g g lot* Proposal 10 See the applicant's letter of justification a e (page 8) - 2. The proposed lot would have 11,200 square feet. The shoreland ordinance requires an average of at least 15,000 square feet. A variance of 3,800 square feet is required. 3. The applicant has reached an agreement with the e owner of 2611 Cypress Street to purchase access to Cypress Street for the southerly P ortion of the site (page 7)', 40 The applicant wants to record a mortgage in Se i September for the house being ng constructed on this property. The mortgage cannot be recorded for a property smaller than the entire parcel (page 6) without city approval roval of a lot division. Approval of a final plat for the entire (page development a e 7 ) cannot be accomplished by September. P 50 The applicant will request preliminary plat approval for the southerly part of the site (page 7) together with the property to the west, in the near future. Comments The need for this variance is due to circumstances uni q ue to this site and the timing of the request. The only acceptable access to the undeveloped property to the south is from Cypress Street. (See public works comments.) If the proposed lot were to be increased to the depth necessary to meet the required minimum lot area it would double front on the future street to run southwest from Cypress Street (page 7) . Double- fronting lots should be avoided because of the ina improvement bility to assess the total cost of future im p along one of these frontages. They are also prohibited, by code, unless there is no other acceptable alternative. For these reasons, approval of this request would be- in the public interest. The need for this variance . is also a result of the timing f the lot division. The variance would • d not be necessary if the applicant were to plat the entire at one time. However, as stated in item four above the applicant has no choice but to request a lot split at this time o� q P Code M requires an average area of at least 15,000 square feet per lot this property. If the subs ect lot were to be included with the proposed 1 ot� the south (page 7) , the average lot p p to g area for the development would be 1 +6 , 84 3 square feet, However, if only one lot is created as is the case, the lot must be at least 15,000 square feet b itself, hence the " Y . e reques__= d variance. Since the applicant has control of and intends to la p t the property to the south in the near future, the intent of the code would b� met. - Recommend a t i on Approval of the enclosed resolution a e 8 0 • (p g ) t approve a lot area var l a-:c of 3 square feet to permit the lot at 1000 East Count Road C to b Y e 11,200 square feet in area, on the basis that: 1. The applicant would suffer an undue hardship ue p to circumstances unique to this site. The only acceptable access to the undevelo ped property to the south is from Cypress prohibiting this lot from having the adequate depth to satisfy the 15,000 square foot minimum .requirement. q arcs 2. The request would be consistent. with the intent of city code. This lot, together with the proposed lots to the south, would exceed the required minimum average lot area requirement for the area. 3. It would be in public interest to approve this variance to avoid an undesirable double- frontage lot. 2 BACKGROUND Y Site .fie s c r i p t i o n 1, Lot area: 4.2 acres 29 Existing land use: single dwelling under construction 30 This lot plus the proposed plat to the south (page 7) : Gross acreage.* 6 0 . 8 Net acreage: 5.8 Proposed average lot area: 16,843 square feet Surrounding Land Uses .North County Road C. Across the street are single dwellings on lots in -excess of 30,000 square feet with at least 100-feet of width. East: Cypress Street. Across the street is a city park.. Southeast: an irregularly shaped single - dwelling lot with about 17,955 square feet of area. South: undeveloped land planned and zoned for single dwellings. The minimum average lot area will be 15,000 square feet. West: a single dwelling on a 16,464 square foot lot. Planning 1. Land use plan designation: RL, residential lower density. 2. Zoning: F, farm residence 34, There would be no adverse impact on the planned density for this area,, because of the existing larger lots and the required 15,000 square foot minimum lot area for new development. 4. Compliance with land use laws: a. State law: The following findings must be made before a variance can be granted:. 1) Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consider- ation. "Undue hardship ". as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls, the -plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if 9 ranted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. 3 2) The variance would be in keeping 'with the spiri t -and intent of the ordinance. b -. City ordinance: 1) Section 36 -566 (c) (2) (d) requires an average lot area of not less than 15,000 square feet for nonwater frontage lots within 1000 feet of Kohlman Lake, 2) Section 36 -564 defines average lot area as "the average of the lot areas within a single development or phase. For a single lot, the minimum allowable area shall be no less than the average g lot area requirement." Public Works 1. Access to this site should be from Cypress Street, 2. Direct access to County Road C would require condemnation of the right -of -way. There is no critical public safety problem to justif y the cost of this condemnation. Direct access to County Road C would result in three street intersections with County Road C within 550 feet (page 6) Ramsey County would prefer that this third intersection not be considered. Three intersections this close together would cause, more interruption of County Road C traffic flow than desirable. 3. Direct access to Connor Avenue should not be considered as an alternative-access to this site. A street in this location would create a small remnant property fronting on the east side of the new street and the north side of Connor Avenue (page 7) . In effect, this remnant parcel would convert the two adjoining properties to undesirable double- fronting lots and reduce the future assessability of the remanent property. Access from Connor Avenue would also involve an unjustifiable condemnation for right - of -way. Procedure 116 Planning commission recommendation 2. Notify the Department of Natural Resources at least ten days prior to the public hearing. 3 City council decision following a public hearing ,4,e If approved, notification of DNR within ten days of the decision 7c Attachments: I . Location map 2. Property line and zoning map 3 . Future plat concept for the property to the south 4. Applicant's letter of justification 5. Resolution 2 BC F le R r'F • I F I F w [AvE "a Ac I 7 F T eN mi LpA.YIwE*j I AVE R pli *A AA C. Av --- L�L. ...Ip LR .................... - R . fi ALAI I R3 r7O owl LOCATION MAP attachment one 5 B r 7R ROA7 PUD mill F j R MI F (R2) Cr < 'A I R / �-- - R A',.:) A%IF a R 3 rc 0, W(I 0i ej or FW ME ONE E MONO, ME on WINE" N 0 3 �; lit i� 975 985 y 1 �, � l� r _�1 _ {' � - �► ? ' ._.1._ 11 C �1Q _ 1 14�� � � ► � - .tea No IMP IK41 PIFusf an .4.*. -Kox. Proposed split line jF7= .970 88 ZS' 2 4f) • I- 8 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 6 attachment two j N •�- ••�'�'• -• - ••ice � �.� •� -. -.�� - - - -, _- _ \ � l ` • f 1 t► 1 / t I V list r •470 ; ; 1 , 4 I NOON i Dwel l i ng under cons i de rat ion Proposed split line Access to Cypress Li Street to be obtai ne f rom the owner .,MIN... of 2611 Cypress ., , Street t l l ♦� 1 I� I I 1 r Ir•- 1 1 � _ � V t ! • 1 t 1 1 / I I 1 1 1 1 i� 1 1 1 ' soil 1 111 1 ,Q t �. , 11 I /�, f f / to 1 I p, 1 1 1 1 11) I ( 1 r 1 t ell 1 ( \�1 , - • • • �' // /, /•� ; 1 � p 1 1 , t '1 ♦` i � �./ 1 1 I ,' /�/ 1 1, 1 t , 1 - - - -� �• — it t 1 1 � 1 �--' —• — i i f' r jir to ,► II ,� , 'IT , tt I tll 1 i me • 1 I- 1 �,11 •♦ ,.• .' ; � 1 f r 111 1 • -•- / ♦ < w.rar�• tttsa� _ . f.. , - • - • • • . ' / {Q / , �' 1 1 1 1 1 / • - 00" 111 • i' , , M � • / to , • _ I 1 _ •� r I / 1 , �• / I. / � 1 1 11 1 1 • 1 1 It 1 1 1 1 It 1 � ,� 1 1 �• 00 000 � ♦ 1 • �w 1 I " 00.- .00� / / .� 10-0 , . Future plat concept for the property abutting to the south 7. attachment three 4 N Go ff Construction 1278 E. County Rd. C ' Maplewood, Minn. 55109 612- 484 -2566 August 8, 198+ City of Maplewood 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Attention: Jeff Olson Dear Mr. Olson, We would like to request a lot split and a variance pertaining to the size of a lot we wish to create. This request is due to a ruling recently established by the Dept. of Natural Resources, requiring all lots platted within 1000 feet of a lake to contain at least 15,000 square feet. This property lies about 300 feet south of bake Kohlman and would contain 11,000 square feet, There are two conditions that are unique to this property. The first being that all previous platting of this land was with the intention of leaving a buildable lot on the southwest corner of Co. Rd . C and Cypress St, The 100' by 112' proposed lot adheres to all normal Maplewood code requirements, This would also enable our south lot line to coins ide with existing lots on the street. By creating a 100' by 112' lot it would allow us access from Cypress St. into the 6.5 acre parcel to the south of the proposed lot. If the corner lot were made any larger, it would land lock the remaining 6.5 acres. This 6.5 acres has three possible ways in which to gain access. What'we believe to be the most feasible way is to create the 100' by 112 lot, leaving 60' along Cypress - St . for an entrance. Additional property was. aquired by Goff Construction specifically for this. The next alternative is to purchase land from Roberts Properties to the south of the parcel to gain entrance. We contacted Roberts Properties, they have no desire to sell their property for that use. The other possibility is to purchase land from Harvey Stanke and Donald Huot . , - could then ,use their side yards to put a road in from Co. Rd . C . Both parties have been contacted, neither of which care to sell for that use. Our intention is to develope this 6.5 acre parcel into a cul de sac for single family homes sometime in the future. Of all the possibilities, we feel the most desirable entrance would be from Cypress St., with the cul de sac going uphill. This would allow lots on. the end of the cul de sac to have south- ern exposures,, If we had to come in from the south, the cul de sac would be at the bottom of a hill, northern exposure, and a 20' decline This could create undesirable conditions in the winter. We hope you will consider these to be viable conditions unique to .this property and grant the requested lot split. Thank you. Sincerely, 8 attachment f 41 2. The request ' wou ld be consistent with the intent of city code. This- lot, together with the proposed lots to the south, would exceed the required minimum average lot area requirement' for the area. 30 It would be a public interest to approve this variance to avoid an undesirable double - frontage lot. Adopted this 27th day of August,1984 . Seconded by Ayes-- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk the i PP City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of -a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the 27th day of August, 1984, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this variance request. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1984. City Clerk City of Maplewood 10 PODAWILTZ DEVELOPMENT 501 MALL GERMAIN CORPORATION SUITE 318 P.O. BOX 1361 (612) 255 -1719 Action by Council: ST. CLOUD MN 56302 Endorsed Modified _.. Rejected August 16, 1984 Date Mr. Barry Evans City Manager City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 RE: Reconsideration of Podawiltz' request for Holmes and Graven as Board Counsel Dear Barry: Please consider this a formal request of the undersigned and for Ci g the Maple Ridge Partnership y approval of the use and retention of the legal firm of Holmes and Graven as Board Counsel with respect to the he application of the aforementioned for Revenue Bonds for Rental Housing. The rationale for the request, while threefold, has its rima ' in the fact that their Holmes and r p ry origin G aven) exper�.ence in housing related issues is unparalleled in Minnesota. Secondly, they have previously represented the Ci ty of Maplewood in its adoption of. i.ts Housing Plan Pr g an and Housing ogram. Lastly, the retention of Holmes and Graven reflects m philosophy of utilizing the most knowledgeable • g and qualified firm avail- able Thank you for your reconsideration of this request, 1 look � forward to the o pportunity of involvement in your dynamic comet unit . Y Please feel free to contact me if you have an questions an Y � d I shall make myself available to . meet with you and the City Council at its earliest convenience. Respectfully, J. Michael Podawiltz F m. F y Action b Council: 00 � 1 MEMORANDUM Endorse d...,..-.- Modif i e d.r..__ ---- -- Rej ecte d TO: FROM SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT /OWNER: . PROJECT: DATE: City Manager Date Associate Planner ..Johnson Approval of a new car dealership in an M -1 zone Highway 61, north of the Datsun Dealership Hess Kline Mitsubishi Dealership August 15, 1984 SUMMARY Request Approval of a new car dealership in a M -1, light manufacturing zoning district. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the land use plan and zoning code. Recommendation Approval of the development of a Mitsubishi car dealership on the M -1, light manufacturing zoned property located northwest of Highway 61 and Connor Aven on the basis that: 1. The proposal is compatible with the permitted uses within the M -1, light manufacturing district and, as such, would not interfere with the proper development of the district. 2. The proposal is compatible with the character and development. of the area. 3. Council has approved three other new 'car dealerships within the immediate area. Approval does not include the site plan. The site plan must be approved by -the community design review board. BACKGROUND Site Description _Size: 92,064 square feet, -with 38.5 feet of. frontage on Connor Avenue. Existing land use: Undeveloped Surrounding Land Uses North: Undeveloped property, zoned for M -1, light manufacturing use East: Duluth Street. Across the street is undeveloped land planned for Rm, residential medium density use. .,South: Undeveloped Connor Avenue right-of-way. Across the r fight -of -way :Ls a - Datsun dealership. West: Highway 61 Past Actions 11- 6 - -69: Council approved the Metropolitan Porsche -Audi new car dealership in the M- 1, light manufacturing zoning district along the east side of Highway 61, south of the KSTP property. 7- 19 -79: - Council approved the expansion of the Porsche -Audi dealership building, on the basis that it "will not interfere with the proper development of the M -1, light manufacturing district." 1- 18 -79: Council approved the Toyota dealership located at the southwest corner of Beam Avenue and Highway 61 zoned for M -1, light manufacturing use. 8 -7 -80: Council approved the Datsun dealership located to the south of this site in an area zoned for M -1, light manufacturing use. Planning 1. Land use plan designation: SC, service commercial 2. The SC designation is "oriented to facilities which are local or community -wide scale. While a full range of *commercial uses is permitted in this district, certain types of facilities which may be of a high - intensity nature,- such as fast -food restaurants, discount -sales outlets, gas stations, a.nd light industrial uses, should be permitted subject to specific performance guidelines. The objective of establishing this district is to provide for a wide variety of commercial uses, compatible with the character and development of the neighborhoods in which they are :1 oca ted . " 3. Zoning: M -1, light manufacturing 9 4. Section 36-186 (ay states that any use permitted in a BC, business commercial district, may be permitted in a M -1, light manufacturing district, "if council is satisfied that such use will not interfere with the proper development of the M -1, light manufacturing district." 5. Section 36-153(d) states that an "automobile sales agency that sells new or new and used cars" is a permitted use in a BC, business commercial district. Public Works 10 As a condition of Community Design Rei vew Board approval, the applicant should enter into an agreement with MnDOT to take title to the excess state -owned highway right -of -way on this site (page Negoti- ations for this transfer-of title are currently in progress. .2o Connor Avenue, along the south property line, is proposed for construction next year. 10 Planning commission recommendation 20 City council decision mb Attachments 1. Location map 2. Property line map 3. Applicant's letter of request 4. Site plan 3-- 60 EAU E BEAM -7-7- 77r TOYOTA VADNAIS HEIGHTS 61 coup T301 L) T29 0 1000' PORSCHE-AUDI Lake X 0 J Lake' 0 41 KOHL AN AVE. 23 CA ROAD C z F sp '� PROPOSED SITE rr 1p CT fVE z z C C) o. C014NOR CT DATSUN z w 4 200_54 AVE .2 L : C % C 22 C� L 0 / 7 /;Vlt I IV N T A 60 L GERVAIS AVE. �� 0 6AN a 929 WING VIKING rZ. VW . ­%. I SHMEN AV AVE. L ARK AVE - 1 L AURIE RD. 79 5 JA @ LOCATION MAP Attachment One ► �- tZ e y ok• ` v V \ 1 ' 4 '� ' ' 4 '� ° — — •- --- -- • OC r c ! r Z 3 1 C� . 7 c_ • , '� r .0 �O . Sd 3N b D A l l•! t � r 14 r _ -�� / v O • y .� 40. A • ..r b Sta •�� U I ... .. Highway. right -of- _ way p, .to be reconveyed - -- ago to Hess Kline - ^' a •o r . 1 C ISCONNOR AV E: 1: V � 1 J .( Q C1 r O: 1 y D AL J - � e L eZ o� • s� �i�.5 9 .. . Z. All C Its C 4 :i \ J • 1 C - ' • ♦ - r" A tJ G O 0 ' PROPERTY LINE. / ZONING MAP Q N 5 Attachment Two HESS KLINE 35W NORTH & COUNTY ROAD C ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 Telephone 612 -636 -6100 July 30, 1984 Honorable Mayor and City Council 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN. 55109 Honorable'Mayor & City Council: I hereby request permission to construct - a new car dealership on the site immediately north of the proposed Connor Street, as shown on the attached diagram. It is my intention to start construction September 15, 1984, of a Mitsubishi dealership presently located in White Bear Lake. Thank you for your kind consideration. Sincerely, Hess Kline REALTOR' COIL MERCIAL* IND TRIAL MANAGEMENT JEAN E. PARRANTO J. E. PARRANTO, INC. 3508 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55 122 4612► 454 -1 600 6 Attachment Three 1 - ' Q � r v, �c.^ '"' "' _ si - •--• —{ - — - �—+ IL IL d 90* ip Vft r 409 - rvv, 1 1 `+ • IV 5 Gar- _ ItY r 1. V n ` w . - J_ • ' - . a .. - '- . � .�. -_ _ .. - I` _ _ - - Proposed. site .plan Mitsubishi Dealership • 7 Attachment four 4 N l i TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Request Action by Council: MEMORANDUM Endorse Modif i e City Manager 8ej ecte Ci Associate Planner -- Johnson Date Tax - Exempt Mortgage Revenue Bond Financing -- Multiple Family. August 17, 1984 SUMMARY Adopt application and approval requirements for multiple - dwelling tax - exempt bond issues. Program Description In October 1982, council adopted a housing bond .plan that authorizes the use of tax - exempt mortgage revenue bond financing for multiple - dwelling developments. By federal law, only rental multiple- dwelling developments. can qualify and at least 20 percent of the units must * be occupied by low - to- moderate income persons ( see housing items three to five, page four). Investors who purchase these bonds do not pay federal income tax on the earnings, hence the tax - exempt status. Reasons for the Request 1 The housing bond plan only authorizes the use of this financing, Specific application requirements and fees have not been established, 2. The Podawiltz Development Corporation is requesting (separate report) tax - exempt financing for a 100 -unit rental development to be located north of County Road D and east of Hazelwood Street. rnmm=n +-c There are three issues that should be- decided before Council considers the Podawiltz request for tax - exempt financing: 19 Should a program participation fee be required similar to that required for the approval of a tax- exempt financing for commercial/ - ndustrial.developments? Council should require a program participation fee. Tax - exempt financing results in a significant reduction in develoment costs, not otherwise available to a developer. Charging a fee for this service is not uncommon, according to Richard Martin of Briggs and Morgan. Mr. Podawiltz has also ind icated * that he is not opposed to paying such a fee. The magnitude of savings to a developer in terms of a typical 100 -unit multiple dwelling complex would be about $1.4 million over the ten-to- year life of the bond issue. If council's present fee for approval of commercial tax- exempt issues were required, the developer's fee for this savings would be $19,000 plus a $1000 application fee.' This fee would increase the monthly rents. of the example 100 -unit development by only about $3.00 a unit. At. their July meeting, the HRA basis of the minimal effect on ratio for the developer; and - t to fund unbudgeted feasibility first -time home buyer study in for future housing programs. endorsed requiring this fee on the rents; the lucrative savings. to fee he desire to be able to request council studies, such as the tandem senior July 1982 or to supplement other funds Minneapolis, St. Paul and Maple Grove require a program participation fee to approve this financing.. Apple Valley, Blaine, Burnsville, Eagan and Minnetonka are studying the issue. Brooklyn Center, Fridley, Hopkins, New Hope, St. Louis Park and Mendota Heights require only a nominal application fee. According to the Metropolitan Council, these are the only .communities that have adopted or are in the process of adopting housing bond plans for multiple- dwelling developments. 2. If a program participation fee is to be required, should it be a one- time fee at bond closing or an annual fee until the bonds are retired? Council should retain both options. Either could be the more advantageous to 'the city, depending upon the circumstances. A lump- sum fee may be needed to fund an immediate large expense, such as an unbudgeted feasibility study, even though an annual fee will generally produce more revenue over the -life of a bond issue. A lump -sum fee should also be considered for smaller issues, about $4.5 million or less, because an annual fee would be too small for any singular program use. (See finance, item six on page five.) The exception would be if there were several smaller issues relatively close together that could generate a more useful annual fee. According to Mike Podawiltz, the lump -sum fee would also be .preferrable to developers, because less administrative time would be involved. The city's bond counsel would assist in the evaluation of the best fee option on a case -by -case basis. 3. Under what conditions should a request for this financing be denied? There are three situations in which this financing should be denied. These are: a . When the proposal would be 'inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. b. Where a development would adversely-affect the vacancy rates of existing apartment complexes in the city. At the present time, this should not be an issue. The average rent in Maplewood is $380 per month, according to the Apartment Guide's figures. New developments, even with this financing, . will likely rent in the $475 to $550 plus range. c. Where there is a reasonable doubt that the development will not be able to comply,' over the life of the bonds, with the federal requirement that at least 20 percent of the units must be occupied by low -to- moderate income persons (page five) . 2 9 Default of this requirement requires sanctions of calling the bonds due (refinancing)* or conversion of the bonds to a taxable status. 'Although the city would have no financial liability if the issue were to convert to a taxable status, this situation should be avoided to reduce any possible misunderstanding among investors concerning the stability of the city's general obligation bonds. As a precaution, the indenture agreement should direct the ro ram P g trustee and the developer to periodically certify to the city that the development is in conformance. These certification requirements, according to Briggs and Morgan, significantly' reduce the chances that an issue would convert to a taxable status. Recommendation Adopt the following fees and criteria to approve tax - exempt mortgage revenue financing for multiple- dwelling developments: 1. Findings required for council approval: a. The development shall be consistent with *the comprehensive plan. b. The development will not have a negative impact on the vacancy . rates of existing multiple dwellings in the city. c. There is reasonable assurance that the development will be able to comply with the 20 percent low -to- moderate income requirement over the life of the bond issue. For items b and c, a certified written opinion from a qualified expert, acceptable to the city, shall be submitted with the application to document why a development will conform. 2. Fees a. An unrefundable $1,000 application fee shall be submitted with the application. b. A program participation fee shall be required. Council shall have the option of requiring an annual or lump -sum fee as follows: 1) At bond closing, a lump -sum fee shall be paid in the amount of one percent of the bond issue, not to exceed $20, 000, less the application fee, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions. 2) An annual fee payable on each anniversary of the bond issue of 1/8 of one percent of the unpaid balance. one -qua r ter of one percent of the bond issue shall be paid at bond closing, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions. 3. The bond indenture agreement shall require: a. The developer to periodically certify to the city, 'compliance with the federal low -to- moderate income requirement, i rement. The frequency uenc q ( q Y of certification shall be determined on a case -by -case basis:) b. The program trustee shall inform the city of any noncompliance trends. 3 BACKGROUND Housing 10 On October 25, 1982, council adopted a housing bond plan, in accordance with chapter 462 C of state law. Page 44 states: "The city is also authorized to issue revenue bonds for the P u rpose of assisting in the acquisition or construction or other provision of multi- family housing within its boundaries. In carrying out multi - housing Y g family ng finance programs under the act, the city is again authorized to exercise, within its boundaries, any and all of the Towers that the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency is authorized to exercise. Much like the single family montage revenue bond programs which may be developed by the city, the city must, prior to issuing any multi- family housing revenue bonds, adopt an individual housing program document which sets forth certain specific information necessary to .qualify the program under the requirements of the act including uch information as the numb i g number of lenders who will be participating n the program, the amount of bonds to be issued and the amount of loans to be made, whether occupants of the housing units will be subject to income limits, whether rental rates will be market rates or subsidized, the administrative requirements of the city with respect to such programs and the costs to the city, if any of the programs, and certain other information. A public hearing must be held on each program after publication of notice in a newspaper circulating generally in the city at least 15 days before the hearing, after which the program may be adopted with or without amendment. Each program, following adoption, must be submitted to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for review and approval. The city may also designate its housing and redevelopment authority to act on its behalf whenever it finds that such action will assist the city in fulfilling the housing goals and policies set forth in this housing plan." 20- One of the goals in the housing plan is to provide 620 new housing units for low -to- moderate income households between 1980 and 1990. As of December 13, 1983 125 of these units had been provided. Of the 495 remaining units, it is estimated that 187 must be provided by new construction, for an approximate annual need of 26.7 units from now until 1990. 3e Low -to- moderate income is defined as an annual adjusted household . income of 80 percent or less of the average annual income in the twin city area. In 1984, the 80 percent ceiling was $25,280. (Gross income is reduced by $750 per adult and $500 per child to calculate adjusted annual income.) In 1984, the Metropolitan Council's suggested rent ceiling for low -to- moderate income households was $515 per month, excluding the cost of utilities. 4. Assuming interest rates will not change significantly from those experienced over the last several years, the use of tax - exempt financing will continue to be necessary to hold the rent for new units below the suggested ceiling of $525 per month. Incomes of $25,280 or less ( low -to- moderate income ceiling) rarely qualify for home ownership, other than a mobile home, n 5. Federal law regarding the issuance of tax - exempt mortage revenue bonds for multiple- family housing requires at least 20 . percent of the units to be set aside for low -to- moderate income persons until the bonds are retired. Once *a person or family is income - qualified, their unit counts toward the 20 percent as long as they reside in the unit even though their income may rise above the ceiling. Finance 1. According to Briggs and Dorgan, . if tax - exempt bonds were issued today, a bond interest rate of about 10.25 percent could be obtained. The present conventional interest rate is about fifteen percent. Four percent less interest equates to an annual debt service savings of about $125,000 or about $1.4 million over the ten to twelve year life of the bonds, for a typical 100 -unit development. 2. Council currently requires a program participation fee of one percent of the bond amount, not to exceed $20,000 less the $1000 application fee, as a condition of approving the use of commercial tax-exempt revenue bonds. 34, By law, cities may require a program participation fee as a condition of authorizing mortgage revenue bond issues for housing developments. Briggs and Morgan has indicated that if council chooses a one -time fee, the procedure used for commercial revenue bonds would be acceptable (item two above) . Where an annual fee would be desired, one- fourth of one percent of the bond issue at -closing and one - eighth of one percent of the decreasing unpaid principle each year thereafter until the bonds are retired would not be unreasonable, 4: Income derived from this program participation fee would not be limited to housing- related uses, provided that the city council, rather than the HRA authorizes their use. 5. A typical 100 -unit multiple - dwelling development would involve a bond issue of about $3 million. Using the formulas proposed in item three, a lump -sum fee would. limited to the maximum permitted or $20,000. (This fee would be calculated by multiplying the amount of the bond issue by a factor of .01, subject to a cap of $20,000.) The annual fee formula, assuming a thirty -year bond period and bond rate of 10.25 percent, would generate $7,500 at closing (one- fourth of one percent of the issue or times a factor of .0025). The annual payments would begin at $3,731 and decrease to $3,424 in the tenth year (one - eighth of one percent of the unpaid balance or times a factor of .00125) . A total fee of $43,,474 would be generated over the anticipated ten -year life of the bond issue. This total has not been adjusted for the effects of inflation which will reduce the real buying power of annual fees, 6. An annual fee of about $5,000 or less would be of little significance for funding feasibility studies or as a supplement to an on program, such as a housing rehabilitation effort. An issue of ' $4.5 million or more would generate an annual fee in excess of $5,000 for at least the first three years - -a time frame with state and federal funding programs. Procedure 10 HRA recommendation 2. Council decision jc 5 � - 3 MEMORANDUM 'TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Barry R. Evans, City Manager SUBJECT: Industrial Development Revenue Bonds DATE: August 21, 1984 A.little known provision of the State law setting allocations on the above contains wording which causes problems. Under the law, we must submit a letter of intent to issue obligations before the end of this year AND submit a check for 1/ of the amount of the obligations. Since we have an allocation of $5,261,941, we would have to submit a check for $52,619 in order to reserve it all. In addition, we must decide before October 31 what bonds are actually going to be issued. If we are not going to issue our total amount, then we can receive back the 1% on the corresponding unused port If we don't know by October 31 and take a chance that we will issue the rest, but don't, we will lose the 1/. The only one approved so far which falls under the allocation is Ki ndercare. I have asked Mary I ppel to ask them if they want to pay 1% of their request to -retain their use of it. The whole process is cumbersome and deserves some thorough discussion of the rami f cations . BRE:Inb SUMMARY OF NEW I D B PROCEDURES TO BE IMPLEMENTED BY THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Approval of Projects by DEED As in the past, entitlement issuers and issuers of bonds not subject to the volume limitation of the T.ax Reform Act of 1984 must submit an Application for Approval of Municipal Industrial Revenue Bond Project with supporting exhibits for .each proposed issue under Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, Subdivision 7a. Allocation Procedure: Entitlement Issuers Assuming a project has been approved and the bonds are within the allocation of the issuer and are issued on or before August 31 in a given calendar year, the entitlement issuer need only submit the new Project Closing Information form. If bonds are not issued by August 31, the issuer can retain the then unused.portion of its allocation only by submitting to.DEED on or before September 1 a letter of intent to issue obligations before the end of the calendar year, together with an .application deposit in the amount of 1% of its remaining unused allocation or the amount of obligations it intends to issue before the end of the year. If the letter of intent and application deposit are not submitted, the remaining unused allocation is cancelled and subject to reallocation in the competitive pool. An entitlement issuer returning for realloca- tion all or part of its reserved allocation by October 31 will receive the corresponding portion of its 1% deposit within 30 days. An entitlement issuer whose allocation has been exhausted or returned can, however, after July 31 apply on a competitive basis for allocations remaining in the competitive pool* Allocation Procedure: Competitive Pool January 1 to August 31 January 1 to August 31, only local issuers that are not entitlement issuers will be awarded allocations from the competitive pool amount. In addition to the Application for Approval of Municipal Industrial Revenue Bond Project, such DORSEY & WHITNEY A Partnership Including Professional Corporations local issuers must submit the Competitive Pool application (form attached as Exhibit A), together with a certified copy of the preliminary resolution and an application deposit in the amount of 1% of the requested allocation. These documents must be submitted to DEED by the 20th day of the month, from December to July, and DEED will allocate available issuance authority by the 5th day of the subsequent month. Allocations are to be awarded monthly by DEED on the basis of the number of points awarded to competing projects under Section 16 of Chapter 582, but (a) before November 1, no allocation will be granted to an application awarded less than four points; (b) any project authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 115A, Chapter 400 or Sections 473.801 to 473.834 will receive an allocation without regard to numerical rank to the extent that the allocation, when added to the issuance authority previously so allocated during the calendar year, does not exceed 49% of the pool amount; ( c ) if on or before September 1, DEED returns for reallocation a portion of its allocation and the iron range resources and rehabilitation commissioner has exhausted or stated his intention to exhaust his allocation, applications from the latter awarded four or more points will receive an allocation equal to $10,000,000 or the amount returned for reallocation by DEED, whichever is less; ( d ) if, on or before September 1, the iron range resources and rehabilitation commissioner has returned for reallocation a portion of his allocation and DEED has exhausted or stated its intention to exhaust its allocation, applications from the latter awarded four or more points will receive allocations equal to $10,000,000 or the amount returned by the iron range resources and rehabilitation commissioner, whichever is less; and (e) if two or more applications have the same rank, the allocation will be made by lot unless otherwise agreed by the respective local issuers. If an application is rejected, the application deposit will be returned within 30 days. A local issuer which has received an allocation before September 1 but intends to issue obligations after August 31 in the year in which the allocation is received must submit to DEED a letter of such intent by September 1. A local issuer returning for reallocation all or part of its allocation so reserved by October 31 will receive corresponding portion of its 1% deposit within 30 days. -2- DORSEY & WHITNEY A Partnership Including Professional Corporations From Septembe 1 to October 31 From September 1 to October 31, any amount remaining for allocation will be allocated among non - entitlement issuers, entitlement issuers, DEED and the iron range resources and rehabilitation commissioner (provided the latter three have either exhausted or returned their allocations). All applicants must submit a Competitive Pool form and application deposit, but entitlement issuers do not need to submit a preliminary resolution. Deadlines are still the 20th of the month (i.e.,* August 20 and September 20) with allocations being made by the 5th day of succeeding month. Fr om November 1 to December 31 Any amount of issuance authority granted to the state which on November 1 has not been both previously allocated and subject to a preliminary resolution will be allocated among local issuers. The allocation will be based on a ranking of points but no minimum number of points will be required. Applications are due by October 20 and must include evidence of passage of a preliminary resolution giving preliminary approval to a specific project and stating the applicant's intent to issue obligations by the end of the year, as well as an application deposit in the amount of 1% of the requested. allocation. DEED is to notify applicants of their allocation by November 5. Any amount issuance authority which becomes available for reallocation after November 5 will be allocated on December 5 among issuers who applied by October 20. If prior to December 20, an issuer determines it will not exhaust its allocation, it may notify DEED and such amount will be available for reallocation and within 30 days DEED will refund to the issuer that portion of any application deposit equal to one -third of 1% of the &-nount returned for reallocation. Any amounts which become available for reallocation will be allocated by DEED on or before December 31 among issuers which have submitted an application by December 10 and which have certified that the project qualifies for carryover treatment under the Tax Reform Act of 1984. (Note: Commercial and industrial projects generally do not qualify for carryf orward treatment under the Tax Reform Act of 1.9 84 . ) Note: A qualifying issuer may also seek to use part of the allocations granted to the iron range resources and rehabilitation commissioner and DEED, or through a joint powers agreement gain access to part of another issuer's allocation. -3 DORSEY & WHITNEY A• Partnership Including Professional Corporations 5 Notice of Issue Any issuer of obligations subject to limitation under the Tax Reform Act of 1984 must give notice of issue to DEED. Please note that the Project Closing Information form ( see Exhibit B attached) has been revised to include notice of issue and must be filed wi thin 5 days-after the date the bonds for the project have been issued. If such notice is not filed within five days after the obligations are issued, the obligations shall be void ( unless waived by the Commissioner of DEED) and DEED will refund the corresponding portion of the issuer's 1% deposit. Additional State Law Restrictions on Chapter 474 Projects Any project to be financed by obligations subject to limitation under the Tax Reform Act of 1984 w i l l be subject to the following restrictions, if the bonds for the project are issued after October 15, 19840 (a) no municipality or redevelopment ageny shall undertake a project except one referred to in Section 474.02, Subdivision if, , unless its governing body finds that the project would not be undertaken but for the availability of IDB financing; (b) a project shall not include: an airplane, a private luxury box, a facility primarily used for gambling, a store the principal business of which is the sale of alcholic beverages for consumption off premises; (c) no more than 10% of the bond proceeds may be used to finance moveable equipment not constituting a fixture; (d) no more than 25% of the bond proceeds , may be used to finance the acquisition of land; (e) not more than $10,000,000 in revenue bonds which are exempt small issues may be issued with respect to any one building which is used for commercial, office or industrial purposes. (Note: Although the restrictions described in paragraphs (b), (d) and (e) have counterparts in the Tax Reform Act of 1984, the restrictions described in paragraphs (a) and (c) do not. Therefore, bonds for projects that are subject to limitation under the Tax Reform Act of 1984 and which do not satisfy the restrictions described in paragraph ( a ) or ( c ) must be issued on or before October 15, 1984.) DORSEY & WHITNEY A Partnership Including Professional Corporations -4- EXHIBIT A COMPETITIVE POOL QUALIFICATION CRITERIA - 1984 PURSUANT TO MINN. LAWS 1984, CH. 582 §16, SUBD. 3 TO BE CODIFIED AS MINN. STAT. §474.19, SU BD.3* all references to sections herein are to Minnesota Statutes as amended NAME CF ISSUER: TYPE OF PROJECT: 'TYPE OF PROJECT: SUBMITTED WITH: WITHOUT: A PRELIMINARY RESOLUTION Claimed by Awarded Applicant by DEED 1 . The 1983 Statewide ave: aoe unemployment rate 8.2% X 110% = 9.02%, The unemployment rate claimed by appli- cant % is equal to, or greater than 9.02 %. Source; the greater of: The most recent estimate of unemployment by the Department of Economic Security for the smalles IC jurisdiction enclosinc the jurisdiction of the applicant. B, Applicants estimate for its jurisdiction. ( attach documentation to support estimate ) . 2. Decline of Employment: Number employed 1982 ;', 1983 ; m be same source each year. Source: A* Dept. of Economic Security for same jurisdiction as Item 1 . A. B, Applicants estimate for its jurisdiction (attach documentation to support estimate) 3. The number of jobs to be created by project is at least .001 X 1983 number of employed shown in Item 20 4. The number of jobs to be created by the project is at least two fobs per $100,000 of issuance authority requested. Q, gua2.ifi cati on Criteria continued. Ta:g...e 2 Claim by Awarded Applicant by DEED I o Ci D D Q D E::j 5. Total market value of taxable property in applicants jurisdiction, as of this date, as most recently certified to Commissioner of Revenue is $ and has either A, Declined from the 1983 Certification to Commissioner of Revenue of $ • Bo Increased from the 1983 Certification to the Commissioner of Revenue of $ at a rate of % which is not greater than 4.13% which is 90% of the increase of the state average market value of 4.59 %, as determined by the Department of Revenue* 6. The estimated market value of the completed project described in the application is $ , and is at yeast equal to .005 X S the market value of all taxable property in the application's jurisdiction based upon the most recent total for applicants jurisdiction certified to the Commissioner of Revenue. 7. True project is wholly located in an enterprise zone desienated pursuant to section 27301312. 8. 7be project site meets the criteria necessary to qualify as a tax increment redevelopment district as defined in Section 273.73, Subd. 10. To qualify for this point, the project need not be included in a tax increment financing district. 90 The project meets one of the following energy conserva- tion criteria: A4, The project is eligible for the additional federal investment tax credits for energy property. B. The project involves construction or expansion of a district heating system as defined in section 116J.36. C e The project involves construction of an alternative energy source as described in section 1 16J. 26, clause (a) , (b) , or (d) , or 116J.922, subd. 6 or 7. (Qhual.ification Criteria continued. Page 3 Claimed by Awarded Applicant by DEED 10. 90% or more of the proceeds of the aroposed obligations will be 1.sed for construction, installation, or additi of equipment used primari to abate or control pollutants to meet or exceed state laws, rules, or standards. 11 The project consists of the renovation, rehabilitation, or reconstruction of an existing building which is: Located in a historic district designated under section 138,73, or on a site listed in the State Registry of Historical Sites under sections 138053 to 138.5815- E, Designated in the Na tional Register pursuant to United States Code, title 16, section 470a. 12. 90% or more of the proceeds of the proposed obligations will be used to finance facilities 4 or waste management as defined section 115A.03, subd. 36, or solid waste as defined in section 116.06 subd. 10. �! 13. Service connections to sewer and water systems are available to the project at the time the application is submitted. 14. Based upon the most recent census data, the minority population in the applicant's jurisdiction is $ of its total population and is at least 110% of the statewide average of 3.9 %, as determined by the Af f irmati.ve Action Division of the Department of Economic Security, according to the most recent census data. (Minority for these purposes includes all races except white but does include hi spanics , as determined by the Minnesota Department of Economic Security in its publication, "Manpower Information for Affirmative Action Programs", Spring 1984 issue, prepared by the Research and Statistical Services office.) -15. As of the date the application is submitted either: A, Neither the anticipated owner of the project, nor any party of which the owner was a controlling partner or shareholder, or which was a controlling shareholder or partner of the owner, owned or operated a substantially simi- lar business within the state, or Qualification Criteria continued. A 'Pace 4 Claimed by Awarded Applicant by DEED g, The project is an expansion of the operations of an existing business which is not like. y to have the effect of transferring existing employmen from one or more other municipalities within the s mate to the municipality in which the project is located. 16. A controlling interest in the project will be owned by one or more women or minority persons. ( Minority f or these purposes is as defined in Item 14.) 17. 75% or more of the proceeds of the proposed issue will be used to rehabilitate an existing structure. (� 18. At the time of application, the property on which the project is to be located is properly zoned for the proposed use. 19. The bond issue involves a credit enhancement device providing additional security for bondholders involving commitments or fees to be paid by the issuer other than from bond proceeds. No points shall be awarded for _ cred+ *%: enhancement devices financed directly or indirec ply by a private, for-profit party which has a financial interest in or is related to any party which has a f inancial ' interest in the project. (attach documentation describing credit enhancement device and source of payment) TOTAL POINTS AWARDED I • Qual if ica pion Criteria continued* VJ Pace 5 The following authorized official is designated for contact by the Department. of Energy and Economic Development: N AM r : ADDRESS: THE UI-D£RS I GNED _CERTIFY THE ACCURACY OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION: Date Da to d Mayor /Chair of Local Issuer Attorney for Local Issuer PLEAS; RETURN TO: MINNESOTA ENERGY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 900 AMERICAN CENTER BUILDING 150 EAST KELLOGG BOULEVARD ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 EXHIBIT B MINNESOTA MINNESOTA ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY kl Mu Industrial Development Act §474.01, Subd. 8 and Minn. Laws, ch. 582 17, subd. 1 to be codified as %74.20. ALLOCATION UNDER WHICH ISSUED: p ENTITLEMENT COMPETITIVE POOL AMOUNT OF ALLOCATION DATE OF COMPETITIVE ALLOCATION AWARD BALANCE OF ALLOCATION (after this closing) PROJECT NAME: PROJECT TYPE: LOCATION.: DEED APPROVAL LETTER DATE: FILE NO, M- pursuant ursuant to Minn. Stat . §4 , subd. 7a (1983 Supp . AMOUNT APPROVED BY DEED: $ BOND CLOSING DATE AND DATE OF ISSUANCE: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF ISSUE: $ TERM : INTEREST RATE: OTHER SOURCES OF FINANCING: EQUITY* OTHER (please specify): TOTAL COST OF PROJECT: $ .PURCHASER (S) OF BOND ISSUE: APPROXIMATE NUMBER OF NEW JOBS: PROJECT CLOSING INFORMATION I NOTICE OF ISSUE =? t, ( due 5 days from date of issue) t, � This report is required pursuant to Minn. Stat. §474.01, subd.. 8 (1983 sup. .) and Minn. Laws, ch. 582 17, subd. 1, to codif ied as §474. 20, ( see attached)* ii 'I - I SSUER : ALLOCATION UNDER WHICH ISSUED: p ENTITLEMENT COMPETITIVE POOL AMOUNT OF ALLOCATION DATE OF COMPETITIVE ALLOCATION AWARD BALANCE OF ALLOCATION (after this closing) PROJECT NAME: PROJECT TYPE: LOCATION.: DEED APPROVAL LETTER DATE: FILE NO, M- pursuant ursuant to Minn. Stat . §4 , subd. 7a (1983 Supp . AMOUNT APPROVED BY DEED: $ BOND CLOSING DATE AND DATE OF ISSUANCE: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF ISSUE: $ TERM : INTEREST RATE: OTHER SOURCES OF FINANCING: EQUITY* OTHER (please specify): TOTAL COST OF PROJECT: $ .PURCHASER (S) OF BOND ISSUE: APPROXIMATE NUMBER OF NEW JOBS: r, .S'U.BM_ITTED BY: DATE: TITLE: REPRESENTING: RETURN TO: MINNESOTA ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT DIVISION ROOM 900, 15"0 EAST KELLOGG BOULEVARD ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 612/297 -4398