Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984 07-09 City Council PacketA G. -E N D A Maplewood City Council 7:00 P.M.,, Mondays July 9, 1984 Municipal Admi ni strati on Building Meeting 84 -15 Carrebt- r �ed , �a�nda (-added H -5') (A) CALL TO ORDER (B) ROLL CALL (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Meeting 84 -14, June 25, 1984 (p) APPROVAL OF AGENDA (E) CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion on these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Accounts Payable 26 _ Designation of Depository 3. Adolphus Street Sewer - Project 81 -4 4. Final Plan: Granada 2nd Addition (F) PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. (7:00) Liquor License: Maplewood Bowl 2. (7:15) Conditional Use Permit: Rolling Hills Mobile Home Park 3. (7:30) Rezoning: McKnight Road (Schreier) (Requires 4 Votes)_ (G) AWARD OF BIDS (H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS 16 Stop Signs: Ripley and Atlantic 2. Leaf Composting Site (KSTP Site) - 30 Reconsideration -. Ki nderCare 4. Plan Amendment: Maplewood West Blvd. (Requires 4 Votes) 5. Reconsideration: Tous 1 ey Addition (J) NEW BUSINESS 1. Assessment Settlement Project 79 -1 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, June 25, 1984 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 84 -14 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember MaryLee Maida, Councilmember Michael T. Wasiluk, Councilmember Present Present Present Present Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes No. 84 -12 (June 11, 1984) Councilmember Bastian moved to as submitted. the Minutes of Meetinq No. 84 -12 (June 11, 1984 Seconded by Councilmember Maida 2. Minutes No. 84 -13 (June 21, 1984) Councilmember Anderson moved to as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Ayes - Mayor Greavu; Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Maida. Councilmember Wasiluk abstained. the Minutes of Meeti No. 84 -13 (June 21, 1984) Ayes - all. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the agenda as amended: 1. Manager's Articles - Maplewood Review 2. Newspaper Dispensers 3. Paramedic Vans 4. Meeting - Park and Recreation Commission 5. Appointments 6. Liaison to HRC 7. McKnight 8. Tousley Development - Reconsideration 9. Battle Creek 10. Kinder Care - Reconsideration 11. Little Canada /Waste Commission Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 6/25 E. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to remove Item E -2 from the Consent Agenda to be discussed at the 5:00 P.M. work session. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. Councilmember Anderson moved, seconded by Councilmember Bastian, Ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda Items 1 and 3 thru 5 as recommended. 1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part I Fees, Services, Expenses, Check Register dated June 12, 1984 through June 14, 1984 - $300,018.11: Part II Payroll Check dated June 15, 1984 - $64,534.45) in the amount, of $364,552.56. 2. License /Permit Fees Removed from Agenda. 3. Paramedic Bills Cancelled as uncollectible the,1982 paramedic bills totaling $3,807.20. 4. Home Occupation Renewal: 1014 Bartelmy Lane Approved the renewal of the conditional use permit for counseling service home occupation at 1014 Bartelmy Lane for five years, subject to continued compliance with the original conditions of approval. Approval is based on the findings that there have not been any problems with this home occupation and all council conditions are being met. 5. Holloway Avenue Improvement Resolution No. 84 -6 -88 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, has heretofore ordered made Im- provement Project No. 81 -12, Holloway Avenue Improvements and has let a construction contract therefore pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429; and WHEREAS, said project has been essentially completed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the project is substantially complete and the retainage is hereby reduced to 2%. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M. Street Vacation, 12th Avenue a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Mr. David Busch, administrator for the Stanley Wessin Estates, to vacate 12th Avenue lying west of White Bear Avenue. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. - 2 - 6/25 d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. f. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: r;l , WHEREAS, David R. Busch (administrator of the George Wessin estate) initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following described real property: That part of Twelfth Avenue according to the vacated plat of Florence Park, Ramsey County, Minnesota, lying west of the White Bear Avenue right -of -way line, as widened in 1984. Also described as the north 33 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 11, T. 29, R. 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. That part of the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 11, Township 29, Range 22, lying westerly of White Bear Avenue. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. This vacation was initiated by David R. Busch on April 25, 1984; 2. A majority of the owners of property abutting said street have signed a petition for this vacation; 3. This vacation was reviewed by the Planning Commission on May 21, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that this vacation be approved. 4. The City Council held a public hearing on June 11, 1984 to consider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above described street, public interest in the property will accrue to the following described abutting property: That part of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 11, Township 29, Range 22, lying westerly of White Bear Avenue. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood C public interest to grant the above - described vacation findings of fact: 1. Improvement of the right -of -way would not serve a 2. The approved final plat for Maple Ridge Mall does segment. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. H . UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. IDR Cub Stores Final Approval ity Council that it is in the on the basis of the following public purpose. not include the right -of -way Ayes - all. - 3 - 6/25 a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Ms. Mary Ippel, Briggs and Morgan, spoke on behalf of the proposal and explained the new legislation regarding IDR notes. The IDR note for Super Valu will not ,affect the limit imposed on municipalities. c. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: NOTE RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: ARTICLE ONE DEFINITIONS, LEGAL AUTHORIZATION AND FINDINGS 1 -1. Definitions. The terms used herein, unless the context hereof shall require otherwise shall have the following meanings, and any other terms defined in the Loan Agreement shall have the same meanings when used herein as assigned to them in the Loan Agreement unless the context or use thereof indicates another or different meaning or intent. Act: the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, as amended; Bond Counsel: the firm of Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, of St. Paul an Rinneapolis, Minnesota, and any opinion of Bond Counsel shall be a written opinion signed by such Counsel; Borrower: Super Valu Stores, Inc., a Delaware corporation, its successors, assigns�ny surviving, resulting or transferee business entity which may assume its obligations under the Loan Agreement; City: the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, its successors and assigns; Escrow Fund: the fund established by the City pursuant to this Resolution and into w i h'cT�ie proceeds of the Note will be deposited; Improvements: the structures and other improvements, including any tangible persona - 1 properl=y, to be constructed or installed by the Borrower on the Land; Land: the real property and any other easements and rights described in Exhibit A atTacFed to the Loan Agreement; Lender: First National Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis, Minnesota, its successors and assigns; Loan Agreement: the agreement to be executed by the City and the Borrower, provid- ing or�ssuance of the Note and the loan of the proceeds thereof to the Borrower, including any amendments or supplements thereto made in accordance with its provisions; Note: the $6,200,000 Commercial Development Revenue Note of 1984 (Super Valu Stores, 1'nc. Project), to be issued by the City pursuant to this Resolution and the Loan Agreement; - 4 - 6/25 Note Register the records kept by the City Clerk to provide for the registration of transfer of ownership of the Note; Pledge Agreement the agreement to be executed by the City and the Lender pledging and assigning the Loan Agreement to the Lender; Principal Balance so much of the principal sum on the Note as remains unpaid at any time; Project the Land and Improvements as they may at any time exist; Project Costs the total of all "Construction Costs" and "Loan and Carrying Charges," as those terms are defined in the Loan Agreement; Resolution this Resolution of the City adopted June 25, 1984, together with any supplement or amendment thereto. All references in this instrument to designated "Articles," "Sections" and other subdivisions are to the designated Articles, Sections and subdivisions of this instrument as originally executed. The words "herein," "hereof" and "hereunder" and other words of similar import refer to this Resolution as a whole not to any particular Article, Section or subdivision. 1 -2. Legal Authorization The City is a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota and is authorized under the Act to initiate the revenue producing project herein referred to, and to issue and sell the Note for the purpose, in the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Act and in this Resolution. 1 -3. Findings The City Council has heretofore determined, and does hereby determine, as follows: (1) The City is authorized by the Act to enter into a Loan Agreement for the public purposes expressed in the Act; (2) The City has made the necessary arrangements with the Borrower for the establishment within the City of a Project consisting of certain property all as more fully described in the Loan Agreement and which will be of the character and accomplish the purposes provided by the Act, and the City has by this Resolution authorized the Project and execution of the Loan Agreement, the Pledge Agreement and the Note, which documents specify'the terms and conditions of the acquisition and financing of the Project; - 5 - 6/25 (3) in authorizing the Project the City's purpose is, and in its judgment the effect thereof will be, to promote the public welfare by: the attraction, encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce so as to prevent, so far as possible, the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; the develop- ment of revenue - producing enterprises to use the available resources of the community, in order to retain the benefit of the community's existing investment in educational and public service facilities; the halting of the movement of talented, educated personnel of all ages to other areas thus preserving the economic and human resources needed as a base for providing governmental services and facilities; the provision of acces- sible employment opportunities for residents in the area; the expansion of an adequate tax base to finance the cost of governmental services, including educational services for the school district serving the community in which the Project is situated; (4) the amount estimated to be necessary to finance the Project Costs, including the costs and estimated costs permitted by Section 474.05 of the Act, will require the issuance of the Note in the principal amount of $6,200,000 as hereinafter provided; (5) it is desirable, feasible and consistent with the objects and purposes of the Act to issue the Note, for the purpose of financing the Project; (6) the Note and the interest accruing thereon do not constitute an indebtedness of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation and do not constitute or give rise to a pecuniary liability or a charge against the general credit or taxing powers of the City and neither the full faith and credit nor the taxing powers of the City is pledged for the payment of the Note or interest thereon; and (7) The Note is an industrial development bond within the meaning of Section 103(b) of the Internal Revenue Code and is to be issued within the exemption provided under subparagraph (D) of Section 103(b)(6) of the Code with respect to an issue of $10,000,000 or less; provided that nothing herein shall prevent the City from hereafter qualifying the Note under a different exemption if, and to the extent, such exemption is permitted by law and consistent with the objects and purposes of the Project,. 1 -4. Authorization and Ratification of Project The City has heretofore and does hereby authorize the Borrower, in accordance with the provisions of Section 474.03(7) of the Act to provide for the construction and installation of the Project by such means as shall be available - 6 - 6/25 to the Borrower and in the manner determined by the Borrower, and without advertisement for bids as may be required for the construction and acquisition of municipal facilities; and the City hereby ratifies, affirms, and approves all actions heretofore taken by the Borrower consistent with and in anticipation of such authority. ARTICLE TWO NOTE 2 -1. Authorized Amount and Form of Note The Note issued pursuant to this Resolution shall be in substantially the form set forth herein, with such appropriate variations, omissions and insertions as are permitted or required by this Resolution, and in accordance with the further provisions hereof; and the total principal amount of the Note that may be outstanding hereunder is expressly limited to $6,200,000 unless a duplicate Note is issued pursuant to Section 2 -7. The Note shall be in substantially the following form: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Commercial Development Revenue Note of 1984 (Super Valu Stores, Inc. Project) $6,200,000 FOR VALUE RECEIVED the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, Ramsey County, Minnesota, (the "City ") hereby promises to pay FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS, in Minneapolis, Minnesota, its successors or registered assigns (the "Lender "), from the source and in the manner hereinafter provided, the principal sum of SIX MILLION TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($6,200,000), (the "Principal Balance ") in installments of principal on in the years and amounts set forth below: Year Amount 1989 $ 620,000 1990 620,000 1991 620,000 1992 620,000 1993 620,000 1994 3,100,000 - 7 - 6/25 and to pay interest thereon on the outstanding Principal Balance of this Note from the date hereof to , 1985, at a rate equal to 658 of the Prime Rate for the purpose of this Note, the Prime Rate shall be the rate publicly announced from time to time by First National Bank of Minneapolis as its prime rate of interest), which interest rate shall change when and as such Prime Rate shall change, and from 1985 to maturity at a rate equal to 708 of the Prime Rate, which interest rate shall change under and as such Prime Rate shall change, all except as the provisions below with respect to the redemption of this Note before maturity or the increase in the rate of interest borne by this Note may become applicable hereto. Interest is payable on each , and , commencing 1984. LA11 interest hereon shall be computed on the basis of the actual number of days elapsed in a year of _ days.] [All interest hereon shall be computed on the assumptions that each month contains 30 days and each year 360 days.] Both principal and interest are payable in any coin or currency which at the time or times for payment is legal tender for the payment of public or private debts in the United States of America. In the event that the interest payable on this Note becomes subject to federal income taxation as a result of a Determination of Taxability, as defined in the Loan Agreement described below, the rate of interest borne by this Note shall increase immediately to the Prime Rate, which interest rate shall change when and as such Prime Rate shall change. In such event, the City shall forthwith pay to the Lender an amount equal to the difference between (a) the amount of interest actually paid on this Note between the Date of Taxability (as defined in the Loan Agreement) and the effective date of such interest rate increase, and (b) the amount which would have been paid as interest on this Note during such period had the rate of interest borne by this Note during such period been equal to the Prime Rate. The principal of this Note is subject to redemption and prepayment, in whole or in part, at the option of the City at the direction of the Borrower, on any date at a price equal to the principal amount being so prepaid with accrued interest to the date of redemption. Any such prepayments shall be applied against the principal installments of this Note in inverse order of their due dates. Notice of prepayment of any principal of the Note shall be mailed, at least thirty days prior to the date set ' prepayment, to the Lender at its address as it appears on the Bond Register maintained by the City Clerk. 2. In any event, the payments hereunder shall be sufficient to pay all principal and interest due, as such principal and interest becomes due, at maturity, upon redemption, or otherwise. - 8 - 6/25 3. Principal and interest due hereunder shall be payable at the principal office of the Lender, or at such other place as the Lender may designate in writing. 4. This Note is issued by the City to provide funds for a project, as defined in Section 474.02, Subdivision la, Minnesota Statutes, consisting of the acquisition of real estate, and the construction of a supermarket facility thereon, pursuant to the Loan Agreement and this Note is further issued pursuant to and in full compliance with the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, particularly Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, and pursuant to a resolution of the City Council duly adopted on June 25, 1964 (the "Resolution "). 5. This Note is secured by a Pledge Agreement of even date herewith among the City, the Borrower and the Lender (the "Pledge Agreement "). The proceeds of the Note shall be placed in the Escrow Fund established pursuant to the Resolution and the Pledge Agreement, and the disbursement of the proceeds of this Note from the Escrow Fund is subject to the terms and conditions of the Pledge Agreement. 6. The City, for itself, its successors and assigns, hereby waives demand, presentment, protest and notice of dishonor; and to the extent permitted by law, the Lender may extend interest and /or principal of this Note, all without notice to or consent of any party liable hereon or thereon and without releasing any such party from such liability and whether or not as a result thereof the interest on the Note is no longer exempt from the Federal income tax. In no event, however, may the Final Maturity Date be extended beyond thirty (30) years from the date hereof. 7. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Note is only transferable upon the books of the City at the office of the City Clerk, by the Lender in person or by his agent duly authorized in writing, at the Lender's expense, upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the City Clerk, duly executed by the Lender or his duly authorized agent. Upon such transfer the City Clerk will note the date of registration and the name and address of the new registered Lender in the registration blank appearing below. The City may deem and treat the person in whose name the Note is last registered upon the books of the City with such registration noted on the Note, as the absolute owner hereof, whether or not overdue, for the purpose of receiving payment of or on the account, of the Principal Balance, redemption price or interest and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to the Lender or upon his order shall be valid and effective to satisfy and discharge the liability upon the Note to the extent of the sum or sums so paid, and the City shall not be' affected by any notice to the contrary. - 9 - 6/25 B. This Note and interest thereon are payable solely from the revenues and proceeds derived from the Loan Agreement, and do not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation, are not payable from or a charge upon any funds other than the revenues and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, and do not give rise to a pecuniary liability of the City or, to the extent permitted by law, of any of its officers, agents or employees, and no holder of this Note shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay this Note or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City, and this Note does not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City, and the agreement of the City to perform or cause the performance of the covenants and other provisions herein referred to shall be subject at all times to the availability of revenues or other funds furnished for such purpose in accordance with the Loan Agreement, sufficient to pay all costs of such performance or the enforcement thereof. 9. All of the agreements, conditions, covenants, provisions and stipulations contained in the Resolution and Pledge Agreement are hereby made a part of this Note to the same extent and with the same force and effect as if they were fully set forth herein. If a default occurs under this Note, or if an event of default occurs under the Loan Agreement or the Pledge Agreement, then the Holder may at its right and option declare immediately due and payable the principal balance of this Note and interest accrued thereon to the date of declaration of such default, together with any reasonable attorneys fees incurred by the Lender in collecting or enforcing payment thereof, whether suit be brought or not, and all other sums due hereunder or under the Loan Agreement, and payment thereof may be enforced and recovered in whole or in part, at any time by one or more of the remedies provided in this Note or in the Loan Agreement or the Pledge Agreement. 10. The remedies of the Lender, as provided herein and in the Loan Agreement and the Pledge Agreement, are not exclusive and shall be cumulative and concurrent and may be pursued singly, successively or together, at the sole discretion of the Lender, and may be exercised as often as occasion therefor shall occur; and the failure to exercise any such right or remedy shall in no event be construed as a waiver or release thereof. 11. The Lender shall not be deemed, by any act of omission or commission, to have waived any of its rights or remedies hereunder unless such waiver is in writing and signed by the Lender and, then only to the extent specifically set forth in the writing. A waiver with reference to one event shall not be construed as continuing or as a bar to or waiver of any right or remedy as to a subsequent event. - 10 - 6/25 IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all conditions, acts and things required to exist, happen and be performed precedent to or in the issuance of this Note do exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due form as required by law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Note to be duly executed in its name by the manual signatures of the Mayor and City Clerk and has caused the corporate seal to be affixed hereto, and has caused this Note to be dated 1984. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA Mayor Attest: City Clerk (SEAL) PROVISIONS AS TO REGISTRATION The ownership of the unpaid Principal Balance of this Note and the interest accruing thereon is registered on the books of the City of Maplewood in the name of the holder last noted below. Date of Registration Name and address Registered Owner Signature of Clerk , 1984 First National Bank of Minneapolis First Bank Place Minneapolis, MN - 11 - 6/25 2 -2. The Initial Note The Note shall be dated as of the date of delivery, shall be payable at the times and in the manner, shall bear interest at the rate, and shall be subject to such other terms and conditions as are set forth therein. 2 -3. Execution The Note shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of its Mayor and City Clerk and shall be sealed with the seal of the City. In case any officer whose signature shall appear on the Note shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Note, such signature shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if had remained in office until delivery. In the event of the absence or disability of the Mayor or the City Clerk such officers of the City as, in the opinion of the City Attorney, may act in their behalf, shall without further act or authorization of the City Council execute and deliver the Note. 2 -4. Delivery of Initial Note Before delivery of the Note there shall be filed with the Lender (except to the extent waived by the Lender) the following items: (1) an executed copy of each of the following documents: (A) the Loan Agreement; (B) the Pledge Agreement; (C) a Cost Certificate signed by the Borrower certifying the use of the proceeds of the Note. (2) an opinion of Counsel for the Borrower as prescribed by Bond Counsel; (3) the opinion of Bond Counsel as to the validity and tax exempt status of the Note; (4) such other documents and opinions as Bond Counsel may reasonably require for purposes of rendering its opinion required in subsection (3) above or that the Lender may reasonably require for the closing. 2 -5. Disposition of Note Proceeds There is hereby established with the Lender an Escrow Fund to be held by the Lender as a separate account of the City as provided in the Pledge Agreement. Upon delivery of the Note to Lender, the proceeds of the Note shall be credited to the Escrow Fund held by the Lender on behalf of the City, at which time the entire principal amount of the Note shall be deemed - 12 - 6/25 advanced, and the Lender shall, on behalf of the City, disburse funds from the Escrow Fund for payment of Project Costs upon receipt of such supporting documentation as the Lender may deem reasonably necessary, including compliance with the provisions of the Pledge Agreement. The Lender or Borrower shall provide the City with a full accounting of all funds disbursed for Project Costs- 2-6. Registration of Transfer The City will cause to be kept at the office of the City Clerk a Note Register in which, subject to such reasonable regulations as it may prescribe, the City shall provide for the registration of transfers of ownership of the Note. The Note shall be initially registered in the name of the Lender and shall be transferable upon the Note Register by the Lender in person or by its agent duly authorized in writing, upon surrender of the Note together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the City Clerk, duly executed by the Lender or its duly authorized agent. The following form of assignment shall be sufficient for said purpose. For value received hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Note of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint attorney to transfer said Note on the books of said City with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: Registered Owner PLEAS "I INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: NOTICE: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or enlargement or any charge whatsoever. Upon such transfer the shall note the date of registration and the name and address of the new Lender in the Note Register and in the registration blank appearing on the Note. 2 -7. Mutilated, Lost or Destroyed Note In case any Note issued hereunder shall become mutilated or be destroyed or lost, the City shall, if not then prohibited by law, cause to be executed and delivered, a new Note of like outstanding principal amount, number and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of such mutilated Note, or in lieu of and in substitution for such Note destroyed or lost, upon the Lender's paying the reasonable expenses and charges of the City in connection therewith, and - 13 - 6/25 in the case of a Note destroyed or lost, the filing with the City of evidence satisfactory to the City with indemnity satisfactory to it. If the mutilated, destroyed or lost Note has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it shall not be necessary to issue a new Note prior to payment. 2 -8. Ownership of Note The City may deem and treat the person in whose name the Note is last registered in the Note Register and by notation on the Note whether or not such Note shall be overdue, as the absolute owner of such Note for the purpose of receiving payment of or on account of the Principal Balance, redemption price or interest and for all other purposes whatsoever, and the City shall not be affected by any notice to the contrary. 2 -9. Issuance of New Notes The City shall, at the request and expense of the Lender, issue new notes, in aggregate outstanding principal amount equal to that of the Note surrendered, and of like tenor except as to number, principal amount, and the amount of the installments payable thereunder, and registered in the name of the Lender or such transferee as may be designated by the Lender. ARTICLE THREE GENERAL COVENANTS 3 -1. Payment of Principal and Interest The City covenants that it will promptly pay or cause to be paid the principal of and interest on the Note at the place, on the dates, solely from the source and in the manner provided herein and in the Note. The principal and interest are payable solely from and secured by revenues and proceeds derived from the Loan Agreement and the Pledge Agreement, which revenues and proceeds are hereby specifically pledged to the payment thereof in the manner and to the extent specified in the Note, the Loan Agreement and the Pledge Agreement; and nothing in the Note or in this Resolution shall be considered as assigning, pledging or otherwise encumbering any other funds or assets of the City. 3 -2. Performance of and Authority for Covenants The City covenants that it will faithfully perform at all times any and all covenants, undertakings, stipulations and provisions contained in this Resolution, in the Note executed, authenticated and delivered hereunder and in all proceedings of the City Council pertaining thereto; that it is duly authorized under the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota including particularly and without limitation the Act, to issue - 14 - 6/25 the Note authorized hereby, pledge the revenues and assign the Loan Agreement in the manner and to the extent set forth in this Resolution, the Note, the Loan Agreement and the Pledge Agreement; that all action on its part for the issuance of the Note and for the execution and delivery thereof has been duly and effectively taken; and that the Note in the hands of the Lender is and will be a valid and enforceable special limited obligation of the City according to the terms thereof. 3 -3. Enforcement and Performance of Covenants The City agrees to enforce all covenants and obligations of the Borrower under the Loan Agreement, upon request of the Lender and being indemnified to the satisfaction of the City for all expenses and claims arising therefrom, and to perform all covenants and other provisions pertaining to the City contained in the Note and the Loan Agreement and subject to Section 3-4. 3 -4. Nature of Security Notwithstanding anything contained in the Note, the Loan Agreement, the Pledge Agreement or any other document referred to in Section 2 -4 to the contrary, under the provisions of the Act the Note may not be payable from or be a charge upon any funds of the City other than the revenues and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall the City be subject to any liability thereon, nor shall the Note otherwise contribute or give rise to a pecuniary liability of the City or, to the extent permitted by law, any of the City's officers, employees and agents. No holder of the Note shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the Note or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City other than the revenues pledged under the Pledge Agreement; and the Note shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City; and the Note shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation; but nothing in the Act impairs the rights of the Lender to enforce the covenants made for the security thereof as provided in this Resolution, the Loan Agreement and the Pledge Agreement, and in the Act, and by authority of the Act the City has made the covenants and agreements herein for the benefit of the Lender; provided that in any event, the agreement of the City to perform or enforce the covenants and other provisions contained in the Note, the Loan Agreement and the Pledge Agreement shall be subject at all times to the availability of revenues under the Loan Agreement sufficient to pay all costs of such performance or the enforcement thereof, and the City shall not be subject to any personal or pecuniary liability thereon. ARTICLE FOUR MISCELLANEOUS 4 -1. Severability - 15 - 6/25 If any provision of this Resolution shall be held or deemed to be or shall, in fact, be inoperative or unenforceable as applied in any particular case in any jurisdiction or jurisdictions or in all jurisdictions or in all cases because it conflicts with any provisions of any constitution or statute or rule or public policy, or for any other reason, such circumstances shall not have the effect of rendering the provision in question inoperative or unenforceable in any other case or circumstance, or of rendering any other provision or provisions herein contained invalid, inoperative, or unenforceable to any extent whatever. The invalidity of any one or more phrases, sentences, clauses or paragraphs in this Resolution contained shall not affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or any part thereof. 4 -2. Authentication of Transcript The officers of the City are directed to furnish to Bond Counsel certified copies of this Resolution and all documents referred to herein, and affidavits or certificates as to all other matters which are reasonably necessary to evidence the validity of the Note. All such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute recitals of the City as to the correctness of all statements contained therein. 4 -3. Registration of Resolution The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a copy of this Resolution to be filed with the County Auditor of Ramsey County, and to obtain from said County Auditor a certificate that the Note as a bond of the City has been duly entered upon his bond register. 4 -4. Authorization to Execute Agreements The forms of the proposed Loan Agreement and the Pledge Agreement are hereby approved in substantially the form heretofore presented to the City Council, together with such additional details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be necessary and appropriate and approved by Bond Counsel prior to the execution of the documents, and the Mayor and City Clerk of the City are authorized to execute the Loan Agreement and the Pledge Agreement in the name of and on behalf of the City and such other documents as Bond Counsel consider appropriate in connection with the issuance of the Note. In the event of the absence or disability of the Mayor or the City Clerk such officers of the City as, in the opinion of the City Attorney, may act in their behalf, shall without further act or authorization of the City Council do all things and execute all instruments and documents required to be done or executed by such absent or disabled officers. The execution of any instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the City herein authorized'shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents in accordance with the terms hereof. - 16 - 6/25 4 -5. Conversion of Note to Bonds. The City acknowledges that the Agreement and the Pledge Agreement one or more fully registered bonds the Borrower reserves the right to an opinion of Bond Counsel is obta the tax exempt status of the Note. Borrower reserves the right to amend the Loan to provide that the Note can be converted into secured by an indenture of trust. In addition, amend the provisions of the Note; provided that ined stating that the amendments do not affect Adopted: June 25, 1984. Attest: er Mayor of the City of ap ewoo Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) 2. 7:15 P.M. Easement Vacation, 2339 Hillwood Avenue a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposal to vacate a drainage and utility easement located adjacent to 2339 Hilltop Drive. b. Manager.Evans presented the staff report. c. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission forward the following resolution to the City Council: WHEREAS, Phyllis Cunningham initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following described real property: A drainage and utility easement over and across the west twenty feet of lot one, block one, Crestwood Knolls, Section 12, Township 28, Range 22; WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above described easement public interest in the property will accrue to the following described abutting property: Lot one, block one, Crestwood Knolls Addition NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPELWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that it is in the public interest to grant the above described vacation on the basis of the following finding -of -fact; That in 1982, a storm -sewer system was constructed which eliminated the need to retain the south 99 feet of this easement. This vacation is subject to retention of the north fifteen feet to provide mainten- ance access to a storm sewer. - 17 - 6/25 Commissioner Barrett seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Fischer, Hejny, Larson, Robens, Sigmundik, Sletten, Whitcomb." d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: :1 WHEREAS, Phyllis Cunningham initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following described real property: A drainage and utility easement over and across the west twenty feet of Lot One, Block One, Crestwood Knolls, Section 12, Township 28, Range 22; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this easement vacation is as follows: 1. This vacation was initiated by Phyllis Cunningham on April 25, 1984; 2. A majority of the owners of property abutting said drainage and utility ease- ment have signed a petition for this vacation; 3. This vacation was reviewed by the Planning Commission on May 29, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that this vacation be approved. 4. The City Council held a public hearing on June 25, 1984 to consider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above described easement public interest in the property will accrue to the following described abutting property: Lot One, Block One, Crestwood Knolls Addition NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood City Council that it is in the public interest to grant the above described vacation on the basis of the following finding of fact: That in 1982, a storm sewer system was constructed which eliminated the need to retain the south 99 feet of this easement. This vacation is subject torthe retention of the north fifteen feet to provide maintenance access to a storm sewer. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (c ontinued) 3. McClelland Street Water Main Project - 18 - 6/25 a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of water service to McClelland Street by construction of a water main and services; and WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the im- provement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the City Engineer advising this Council that the proposed im- provement McClelland Street water main is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to M.S.A. Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $56,400.00. 3. A public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1380 Frost Avenue on Monday, the 30th day of July, 1984, at 7 p.m. to consider said improvement. The City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 4. Snow Fence Easement — Beam and White Bear Avenue a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: :� WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood a municipal corporation obtained a highway easement free and clear of all encumbrances of the Northerly 33 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, lying West of White Bear Avenue pursuant to Document No. 1143676, 1241 Deeds dated February 21st, 1947, filed March 20, 1974; WHEREAS, the easement included the right of the City of Maplewood, a municipal corporation to use, construct a -nd maintain upon the lands adjoining the Northerly 33 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, lying West of White Bear Avenue, such snow fences as it may from time to time be necessary; WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood, a municipal corporation no longer desires to exercise its right to use, construct, and maintain upon the land adjoining the Norther- ly 33 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, lying West of White Bear Avenue, such snow fences as it may from time to time deem necessary; - 19 - 6/25 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Maplewood: 1. The City of Maplewood hereby releases its right to use, construct and maintain upon the lands adjoining the Northerly 33 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, such snow fences as it may from time to time deem necessary. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS ( continued) 3. 7:30 P.M. Home Occupation - 2163 Mapleview Avenue a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Ms. Jeanne Olson, 2163 Mapleview Avenue, to obtain a conditional use permit to permit the teaching of hobby ceramics as a home occupation. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Whitcomb moved the Planning Commission forward the following resolution to the City Council: WHEREAS, Jeanne Olson initiated a conditional use permit to teach hobby ceramics as a home occupation at the following described property: Lot 28, Block 3, Robert Tilsen's Homesites This property is also known as 2163 Mapleview Avenue, Maplewood; WHEREAS, Section 36 -66 of the City Code requires home occupations to conform to the following requirements: 1. Not more than one person, other than members of the family residing on the premises, shall be allowed to engage in such occupation. 2. An area equivalent to no more than twenty (20) percent of each level of the dwelling unit floor area shall be used in the conduct of a home occupation. 3. There shall be no change in the outside appearance of the' buididiing or ppermises,_ that would indicate the conduct of a home occupation, other than one sign meeting the requirements of the City sign code. 4. Limited retail sales of products produced off -site may be permitted, but only when subordinate to the principal activity of the home occupation. 5. No traffic shall be generated by a home occupation in greater volumes than would normally be expected in a residential neighborhood. The need for off - street parking shall not exceed more than three off - street parking spaces for home occupations in any given time, in addition to the parking spaces required by the resident occupants. 6. No equipment or process shall be used in such home occupation which creates noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odors or electrical interference detectable to the normal senses off the lot. In the case of electrical interference, no equipment or process shall be used which creates visual or audible interference in any radio or television receivers off the premises, or cause fluctuation in line voltage off the premises. - 20 - 6/25 7. No fire safety or health hazard shall exist. 8. A home occupation shall not include the repair of internal combustion engines, body shops, machine shops, welding, ammunition manufacturing or other objectionable uses as determined by the City. Machine shops are defined as places where raw metal is fabricated, using machines that operate on more than one hundred twenty (120) volts of current. 9. Any violation of these requirements shall result in the denial or revocation of the home occupation. 10. Approval shall be for a period not to exceed one year. Renewal shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 17, Article II, of the City licensing code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the above described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of the zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as street, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development and design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Renewal may be granted if all of the home occupation code requirements have been complied with and no nuisance situations persist. 2. No more than three customer cars shall be parked on street at any one time. - 21 - 6/25 3. An operative 10 -pound dry chemical, all purpose fire extinguisher must be wallmount- ed and readily available in the kiln room. 4. Upon Council renewal, a license shall be obtained from the City Clerk within ten days or the permit renewal shall be null and void. Commissioner Barrett seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Fischer, Hejny, Larson, Robens, Sigmundik, Sletten, Whitcomb." d. Mrs. Jeanne Olson, the applicant, stated she agreed to the conditions. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Councilmember Wasiluk introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 84 -6 -94 WHEREAS, Jeanne Olson initiated a conditoinal use permit to teach hobby ceramics as a home occupation at the following described property: Lot 28, Block 3, Robert Tilsen's Homesites. This property is also known as 2163 Mapleview Avenue, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by Jeanne Olson, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on May 21, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said permit be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on June 25, 1984. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, Section 36 -66 of the City Code requires home occupations to conform to the following requirements: 1. Not more than one person, other than members of the family residing on the premises, shall be allowed to engage in such occupation. 2. An area equivalent to no more than twenty (20) percent of each level of the dwelling unit floor area shall be used in the conduct of a home occupation. 3. There shall be no change in the outside appearance of the building or premises, that would indicate the conduct of a home occupation, other than one sign meeting the requirements of the City Sign Code. - 22 - 6/25 4. Limited retail sales of products produced off -site may be permitted, but only when subordinate to the principal activity of the home occupation. 5. No traffic shall be generated by a home occupation in greater volumes than would normally be expected in a residential neighborhood. The need for off - street parking shall not exceed more than three off - street parking spaces for home occupations at any given time, in addition to the parking spaces required by the resident occupants. 6. No equipment or process shall be used in such home occupation which creates noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odors or electrical interference detectable to the normal senses off the lot. In the case of electrical interference, no equipment or process shall be used which creates visual or audible interference in any radio or television receivers off the premises, or cause fluctuations in line voltage off the premises. 7. No fire safety or health hazard shall exist. 8. A home occupation shall not include the repair of internal combustion engines, body shops, machine shops, welding, ammunition manufacturing or other objectionable uses as determined by the City. Machine shops are defined as places where raw metal is fabricated, using machines that operate on more than one hundred twenty (120) volts of current. 9. Any violation of these requirements shall result in the denial or revocation of the home occupation. 10. Approval shall be for a period not to exceed one year. Renewal shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 17, Article II, of the City licensing code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above des- cribed conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the City's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical inter- ference or other nuisances. I 6. The use would generate only minimal. vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. - 23 - 6/25 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Renewal may be granted if all of the home occupation code requirements have been complied with and no nuisance situations persist. 2. An operative 10 pound dry chemical, all purpose fire extinguisher must be wall mounted and readily available in the kiln room. 3. Upon Council renewal, a license shall be obtained from the City Clerk within ten days or the permit renewal shall be null and void. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Leaf Composting Site a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember BAstian moved to table this item until the meeting of July 9. 1984. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 2. Design Review Board Resignation a. Manager Evans presented a letter of resignation received from Dean Hedlund from the Community Design Review Baord. b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 84 -6 -95 WHEREAS, Dean Hedlund became a member of the Community Design Review Board of Maplewood on November 5, 1981 and has served faithfully in that capacity. WHEREAS, he has freely given of his time and energy, without compensation, for the betterment of the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, he has shown sincere dedication to his duties and has consistently con- tributed his leadership and effort in many ways for the benefit of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, and the citizens of the City, that Dean Hedlund is hereby extended our heartfelt gratitude and appreciation for his dedicated service and we wish his con- tinued success in the future. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. - 24 - 6/25 3. Parks and Recreation Commission Resignations a. Mayor Greavu moved to table this item until a s Commission meeting is held. ial Council /Parks a nd Recreation Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS (c ontinued) 4. 7:45 P.M. Variances - Roselawn Avenue to McMenemy Street a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of the St. Paul Board of Realtors for approval of a setback variance of 26.2 feet for the building and thirty (30 ft.) for an extension of the building's front facade to the southerly lot line and approval of a landscaping variance of 16.2 feet on the south side of the building. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Mr. Craig Rafferty, architect representing St. Paul Board of Realtors, answered questions from the Council. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Mayor Greavu introduced the followinq resolution and moved its adoption: :�•. WHEREAS, Craig E. Rafferty applied for a variance for the following described property: Lot One, Block Three, Maplewood Office Center This property is located at the northwesterly corner of McMenemy Street and Rose - lawn Avenue, Maplewood; WHEREAS, sections 36 -154 (b) and 36 -27 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires a front yard setback of at least thirty feet and a twenty -foot wide land- scaped yard adjacent to residential development; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a building setback of 3.8 feet and a wing wall extension to the southerly south lot line, requiring building variances of 26.2 feet and thirty feet and a landscaping variance of 16.2 feet; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on May 8, 1984. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Community Design Review Board on May 22, 1984. The Board recommended to the City Council that said variance be approved. - 2.5 - 6/25 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on June 25, 1984 to consider this variance. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The spirit and intent of the ordinance would be met since the 90 foot wide right of way (70 feet of boulevard) would add considerable width to the proposed 3.8 foot wide on site landscape area. 2. Strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship because the site was considerably narrowed by the extra wide taking of right of way along Roselawn Avenue by the State. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Maida and Wasiluk. Nays - Councilmember Bastian. Mayor Greavu called a 5 minute recess. Mayor Greavu reconvened the meeting at 8:00 p.m. 5. 8:00 P.M. Garage Moving - 1869 Lakewood Drive a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Mr. Robert Dreger, 1869 Lakewood Drive, for a conditional use permit to move a garage onto his property. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Mr. Robert Dreger, the applicant, spoke on behalf of his request. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Bastian moved to approve the request of Mr. Robert I a 14 by 22 foot garage onto his property at a ewoo ra "ve su6j northerl lot l ine beinq veritied b survey pans Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. G. AWARD OF BIDS Insurance to move a. Manager Evans stated on June 8th bids were opened for property, liability and worker's compensation insurance. These bids were reviewed and analyzed by the City's insurance consultant whose report and recommendation is submitted. b. Mr. A.I. Ciliske, Jr., Corporate Risk Mangers, Inc., the consultant, explained his recommendation. - 26 - 6/25 c. Mr. Jerry Ekblad, Ekblad, Pardee and Bewell, spoke on behalf of his proposal d. Mr. Robert Connor, Lakeview Agency, spoke on behalf of his proposal. e. The agents in attendance at the meeting agreed they could handle the bids separately if that is the way they were awarded. f. Councilmember Bastian moved to award the bid for boiler and machinery covera to Affiliated F.M. Insurance Company, and Lakeview Associates as the agency in t amount of and for allother coverage to Home Insurance and Ekblad ar Bewell as the designated agency in the amount of . Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu; Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Maida. Nays - Councilmember Wasiluk. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS (c ontinued) 6. 8:15 P.M. - Code Enforcement, Minimum Floor Area (2nd Reading) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the rea.doption of the minimum foundation area requirements for lz story bi- level, tri -level and two story single dwellings. b. Manager Evans present..ed the staff report. c. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. d. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. f. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 568 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING CODE RELATING TO MINIMUM FOUNDATION AREA REQUIREMENTS THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 36 -67 (6) is amended to read as follows: Section 36 -67. Minimum foundation areas; room requirements. (a) The foundation area for any single dwelling shall not be less than the following: (1) One story dwellings, 950 square feet. (2) 12' story dwelling, 720 dquare feet. (3) A bi -level dwelling, 816 square feet. (4) A tri -level dwelling, 765 square feet. (5) A two story dwelling, 528 square feet - 27 - 6/25 b. Room size and number shall be consistent with Uniform Building Code standards. Section 2. Section 36 -6 Definitions is amended to add the following new subsections: Dwelling, single: A detached building on a lot, designed exclusively as a residence for one family. a. One story dwelling: single floor level; usually at grade level b. 12 story dwelling: two floor levels; one at grade and one above grade, which does not have full ceiling height for the entire above grade level c. Bi -level dwelling: two floor levels; usually one four feet below grade, one four feet above grade, both with full ceiling height. May be on sloping lot with lower level partially exposed. d. Tri -level dwelling: three floor levels; usually one four feet below grade, one at grade, and one four feet above grade, all with full ceiling height. e. Two -story dwelling: two floor levels; one at grade and one above grade, both with full ceiling height. Foundation area: The gross horizontal area of the building foundation, including a tuckunder garage, measured from the exterior side of a frost wall or basement wall. Grade: as defined by the Uniform Building Code. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon passage and publication. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (continued) 2. T.H. 61 Access Ayes - all. a. Director of Public Works Ken Haider presented the staff report. b. Ms. Julie Skolman, Traffic Section of Minnesota Department of Transportation, spoke on behalf of the highway department proposal. c. The following presented their opinions: Mr. Warren Spannaus, attorney representing Datsun and Perkins Mr. Gene Breckner, Perkins Mr. George Trudell, Northernaire Motel Mr. Dale Swensen, Ethan Allen Galleries Mr. Vance Grannis, Jr., attorney representing Mrs. Elzy Mr. Don Christensen, 1111 E. Co. Road C d. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its a ion: - 28 - 6/25 84 -6 -97 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is concerned with providing safe and convienient access from T.H. 61 to the frontage roads north of T.H. 36; WHEREAS, The Minnesota Department of Transportation has developed a plan to provide and implement such access; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that staff is to negotiate an agreement with MnDOT and appropriate property owners to implement the project; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the agreement and final concept plan will be presented to the City Council for final approval as soon as possible. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. Bob Vaught - 1649 Frank Street a. Mr. Vaught requested the stop signs at Ripley and Atlantic be removed. (Council had recently ordered the stop signs installed in response to area residents request.) He stated they were not needed. b. Councilmember Bastian moved reconsideration of the placement of the stop signs at Ripley and Atlantic and place the i em on e u y agenda. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. c. Daryl Kolby, 1714 Frank, also stated the stop signs are not necessary. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Maplewood Review Article - Manager a. Councilmember Wasiluk commented and expressed his displeasure with the Manager's articles in the Review. b. No action taken. 2. Newspaper Dispensers a. Councilmember Anderson questioned if the newspaper dispensers create any revenue for the City or do they require a yearly permit or fee. b. A permit is not required. Staff will investigate. 3. Paramedic Van a. Councilmember Anderson requested that at the time of the purchase for the next paramedic vans if staff would look at larger vans that could accomodate more than one person at a time. 4. Meeting - Council /Park and'Recreation Commission /Park Department Staff a. Councilmember Anderson requested Council establish a special meeting with the - 29 - 6/25 Park and Recreation Commission and Park Department Staff. b. A meeting was established at 5:30 P.M. July 9, 1984 in the Council Chambers. 5. Appointments a. Councilmember Bastian outlined various procedures for appointments to the boards and commissions. 6. Liaison - HRC a. Councilmember Bastian commented that the HRC had requested having a liaison person at their meetings. Is this feasible? b. Council stated progress had been made by way of the Council /Commission meetings. 7. McKnight Road a. Councilmember Bastian commented on a letter from MnDOT District Nine Engineer Kermit Macrae requesting information of how to obtain a variance. b. Councilmember Bastian requested that Ramsey County be contacted to reduce McKnight Road from four (4) lanes to three (3) lanes. c. Staff will contact the County. 8. Tousley Development a. Councilmember Bastian moved to reconsider the Tousley Development Preliminar Plat app roved at the meeting of une 11, 1984 and place the item on the u y , anon a Seconded by Councilmember Maida. 9. Battle Creek Park Ayes - all. a. Mayor Greavu commented on a letter received from residents along the Battle Creek Park boundary explaining their problems. Does Council have anything to add? 10. Kinder Care Center - Reconsideration a. Mayor Greavu moved to reconsider the motion to deny the revenue note for Kinder Care Center taken June 11, 1984 and place t e item on the July 9, 1984 agenda. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATION 1. Letter from Little Canada a. Manager Evans presented Council with a letter from the Little Canada City Attorney asking if Maplewood would join them if they take action against the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission regarding the raw sewage that went into Lake Gervais /Kohlman Lake, etc. b. Director of Public Works explained what is causing the problems and does not recommend joining in any action. - 30 - 6/25 c. Council will take the matter under advisement. M. ADJOURNMENT 10:05 P.M. City Clerk - 31 - 6/25 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE JULY 9,1984 Page 1 1984 CITY OF MAPLE'WOCO CHECK REGISTER CHECK hC. CATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCaI 164M69 06/27/84 6.656.77 FINN STATE TREAS MOTCR VEH LIC PFL 3 164M69 G6127/R4 474.00 M?NN STATE TREAS ONR LIC RBL �b Z�t6j9 _ __ - 06/27/84 -- - - _. _ -- 383.00 _ - - - - 01NN STat_ TR�AS ORI VERS L ICE NcE P • a - 79515.77 C� 164U77 06127184 BQ.OQ UN ITE'D SUS!NESS MACH SERVICE 165C4nn., C6/27/E4 1.20.50 CL"RK OF COURT C T DRZ VERS LZC 12C .50 # iF ' • - 06/27/84 - 3.398. 0 MINN STATE. TREASURER M 0 T0R V LIC P8L ` 1650069 C6/27/84 .30 PI NN ST ATE TREASURER M OT:.R VEH. LIC PPL 1651 6 06/27IF4 284.00 fT &N STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC FEL 3;282. # _ 24 f # # # #f 165834 06/27/84 2.547.00 RUSLO ELECTRON: CS MAI NT CO%ITRAC T ' _71 is _.. -- -- • - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - -- -.._. . __ ....- -- - 2, 547,00 # - - -- .. ._ _.. -- • -- - - 16 - - -- _U 6127184 __ .. 4000 KRLSE RAY REFLND 1 km: 1660 69 06127/84 69753.94 PINK STATE TREASLRER MOTOR Vt1✓ LIC PPL _. 37+ 187,x'0 - FINN STAT, TREASURER DRIVERS LIC FFL c 13el 699/4004 I 4' j42 1 6FK20 06f27f Q4 145 KALE ROSEPARY P/R 0- i3U C TI0N t3 145.00 i 44 1 167M 20 G6/27/84 10 9625.0 C ME TR0 WAST f CONTP OL SAS PBL 4e' 16 70020 06127/84 106.25— M =TRH W CDN740L SAC, PBL 42 109518o75 1 5 2 53 1670065 176/27/$4 ? 483.94 !INN STATE TREASURER MCT.CR VEH LT- P8L 54 167M69 06/27/84 3C8.00 FI LNN STATE TREASURER DRI VLRS LTC r-FL 55- �� 157Mb9 -- Gb! ?7/$�. - - -_. - .. -- _ '-- - . _ MINN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC C9L �'56I 4 ,t1T1o44 f _ _ _ .. ..- ... _. .. .. .ti •... ._ ., ,-_. . - ._ 9999, 1, 9999 _. _ - . t--�; 1984 ctrY OF MAPLEYaO0 CHECK REGIST =R CHECK AC. DATE Apou" VENDCP ITEW DESCRI FTTo' 2 3 ` �Rlf f .._ __ . _- - .. - _, -._.. __ - 99__99 - - - -- ---- - - - - -- -- - • - - -- -... -- - _. _ -- - -- - -- •- - - - -- •- - - � _ - _ . . __ � 167M71 06/27/84 •05— Mll ST TIREAS SURTAX SURTAX PBL 6� 167M71 06/27/84 1 •223.98 Pr ST TREIS SUPTAX SURTAX PEL � 1'67PF71 - - --- � b/27"4 - -- __. -- 24 MN ST TREAS SURTAX SURTAX PBL 131 1099.45 ;Z 16 0 6127/8 4 674. FOSTMASTER PuSTA GE - -6-7 4 *95 - 17022C 06/27/84 16. ^0 ACC /REC MANAGEMENT AMB BILLINGS;) j18 17C220 C6/27/84 12.00 ACC/RTC WANAGEME�T APB BILLIrGS -C 6T27/84 - -.. - 18 ... -- ACC /REC MANAGEMENT _ AMB BILLINGS X46.40 12� i« i24 17CAr5 06/27/84 338.25 AFSCwr 2725 UN ICAJ b S FB 25.— ---- -I 7UA05 - - - -... --- '0612.7T84 — - - 10.64 ArSCME '2725 UNION DUES FEL X27 348.89 1� 43 17 ^C 35 06/2? /84 1 59420e 0 0 CT Y CNTY rR UN' C"4 CPEDi T U% PB L 15 9 4 (1 0�► 3) 33 *! ! * t f 34 35� 170I15 1 36 16/27/ 2 ,v220.41 ICMA DEFERREO CCMP Pf 17C 15 C6/27/F 514. — 2 9 735'0 -- 3 8 ... ICf DEFERRED CCMF P: 3f i 39; 40' '4; 17OM35 06/27/84 313.75 MINN BEN ASSor ItiSUFQNC= << 1 `� ~ 313.75 1 4 4� 1 I 0�.�4 - -- _. M 1► FEDERAL SAY NGS FkT P9L 48: 159OC2.64 - -° - -• -- - 49i -- - - • --•- -- _._ 99__9_9._ _____- ...--- -.. - -• • -- --- - . _____ - ._ --- -- - - -- -- --..._ . __. 9999_.. - - --- ... l0• 170M61 06/27/84 410.00 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS INSURANCE 4'10. './ 0 - - i53 _ 54 -t-- - -�t 17OP65 '06127/84 89119.54 MN ST COMM /REV SkT PBL • .. .. . ..: r , _ .. ..r .{ __ r. "yt: ^.r v w. En Y. •.. J-.. ... J . w1 Nk. i ...., t-r .. . 1. ._ A 1 _ w .. .� .� r W as ._ a . . . . W i .... a � � 1984 CITY OF MAPLEYQCO ate' �►- •M[.. ^_ .�M.�w��'��Il +�.- l.tMe�!.a�O� wq - r� _- .. � _. .. CHECK REGISTER CHECK NC. CATE A VrhCCz ITEM DESCPIPTION 2 8,119,.54 e 1701068 ii6/27/84 15.77 MN ST RETIREMENT DEF CIM PLB i� 711M 68 - -- - DblZT71!4 - -- - -- - - ��3 _ _.._ M�! ST RET IREMEr�T DEF COM PLB 25.0c - __ - — - - - -- 27-f8 30 M ±NN STAT TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC ppL ! i 17CM69 Q6/27/84 4�505.�4 PTNN STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC PEL 1701 C6/27/84 .290.00 Mn STATE TREASURED DRIVERS LIC F8L 10,626.28 * _ 17OM TO 06127/84 4 9 085.34 PN ST IiRE AS S /S S/S PBL — "17DM70 06I�7/84 - ..- - —_ - 4.268.27 - ON SATE TREA S So S.S PBL 1F 8 *353.61 21 1731086 06 127184 80000 MOGRE N BR OTME R S REF LND - - -- - 172221 06/27/84 60.75 COLLIlS STEVE RENT A T-EN 60.75 r 131► -. - —. - - - - I~ 6727/T4 . _... __ -- _ - 90 90D CLERK 8F D iSIR CRT C hTY O RI Y RS LIC 3 90. GO i 172M69 06/27/84 3,732.75 MINN STATE TREASURER MC'TOR VEH LIC PO 2 m s7 7b� - ----- b727/�4 - - -- -- _ 28�.D0 WINN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC PBL 4 39 ; d 42; 173M69 06127/g4 3.915.93 Mg NN STATE TREAS MOTOR VEH LIC PEAL 12 4.00 FINN STATE TREAS DRIVERS LIC FDL 44 11 43 4 i 48 173 NO5 0 6127/84 210.OD NAT REG; 'STRAP EFT- TES n SG: 52 '53! 174004 >B6/2T/S 277.94 PEA LTH RESOURCES REFUND ��. 174 004 06/27/E4 65.90 HEALTH RESMURCES INTERE- ST 1595 _ .- ..♦ -.1• .i ` _ .-. r ._ .. �. ice_ 1 _. .' . 4 r.. .. ._. .. ... _ ". � •.. ._ .. - J L� 1984 CITY OF MAFLEW300 CHECK REGISTT'R ' Ct'ECK NC* DATE AMOLPT r V NCO i TE M DESr ' T' P .. _F 2I 3; 1 74 22 1 06/27/84 13.50 COLLIE S STEVE RENT A TELL► 4 i 3 `e — g { 174223 06/27184 66.00 MC DONALOS PROGRAMS £ lio 6b *00 E,. -- -- i74Nb9 - - -- --- -_b /27f_F4 - _ ___.. - -- - -__ ._4003.g5 - MINA STATE TREASUR_R MCTCR VEH LIC � 174M69 061 27/84 259000 INN STATE TREASURER D LIC FFL ! ilsfl� r, �� ---- '►74�$3 _ _. - 7b7�7/84 1560e - —. - - STATE OF - RTNN - TREAS CERTIFICA TI 0% ' 174583 Di6/27184 15.00 STATE OF MINN TREAS C= RTIFICATI`N =0.00 +2s �. -.`_ 17��169 - - - 0b /�TI$4 _ _ - - - 4 4'93,75 - MINN STA TREASUR MTCR VET! L:C r 1771 06/27/84 275. ^0 MIN STATE TREASURER LICENSE FBL 177ME9 C6/27/84 34.00 P'NN STATE TRE ASUP , LICENSE PDL C. =' - -- .EI_2? R4 X7'.00 � Thh SEAT= TREASURER MCTCR VLt� LI F 5 r79.75 3� 33 177T61 06/27184 ?O.00 T06NHCME T hVE STPhT REFL C 0. 178ME9 06/27/84 6017.34 MINN STATE TREAS MOTOR VEH LIC 178M69 06/27/E4 395.00 MINN STATE TR A S MCTGR V ET LIC P � __ -- `7 . ; 2 X2.3 4• -f _ 44 ` 179032 06/27/84 107, RO MINN ZOO PROGRAMS 45 as - 1792 - _ _- _3.50 bLAE'LT US CRAIG - RFNTA A TEEN 13.50 �- r _ 179245 . _ - - -- 06/ - 2?/84 42 5,1 _ F E • C P LES ELECTPIC CCNTRACT FYM �. 3' �154 12 ���; MUELLER P!PELINERS -- - — CONTRACT FYM .. . . .. •- � v - . - .. .: r ..r• - ..•.:..,, .. ...n-•.•r. yr -..- ..., ..i... _ -•...: r. r• .. . rr, r�.4 . Y•i. _ ._ • � .yr ..i. ti .. . • .. 1984 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER C1•ECK AC. CATE AMOVfI WENDC►- ITEM DESCRIPTION ' 179"69 06/27/t4 7 MINN STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC PP.. a 179M69 ^6/27/94 423.00 MINN STATE TREASURER MOTCR V EH LIC OR - 53C . 5 179M76 06/27/84 6 *777 *02 MN STATE TREAS PERT PERA PBL 179M76 06/27/84 9 769.61 FN STATE TR* AS PERA PERA PBL ' 16 9 546063 * ..... _ _ 17955G L6/27/84 16.89 STAPLES PAULINE PROGRAPOS f 16.88 1ti�C6 L6TZ7I84 - _. ____ ._ 'U .. -.. _ _. _. =AST CDUtiTY LICE FIRE PROTECT ITV 181E L6 06/27/84 49 91 25.00 EAST COU.'TY LINE FIRE PROTECT i "d �2 . 53 9 6 25.0 C t z , w - ._-_ ---191 G - 5 2 - - 0612718 4----- — - - -- -•- 91 0 0 . _ _ .- -C L A O S T O N' FIRE FIRE P R 0 T * C T i - N # 181G52 06/27/54 579CFO *00 GLADSTCNE FIR FIRE F-RCTECT TCN 629225.00 - C612 I/ �,;SOQ.00! FARKSID� a IR_ FIRS F'P.t?T_CTi.�N 181P10 06/27/84 35 650or.)0 FAFKSIDE FIRE FIRE FROTECTICN c -� 40 ,1 50.00 - 288 024.98 FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL .___ __ —_ -• -- -- - -- -- - - -- - -- ---- - - - - - -- . __ .__.--- • - -,1.2 9 513.3 0 -- --- — • -- - - -- F U A 0 ' T C T A L 8 3 -12 RICE C t+ T Y Y J 15 9041 .40 FUND . 47 TOTAL 78 -1D H L LW^ CC C 142 30000 FUND 9^ TOT SANITARY SEWER F ' 562:08 - !FUND �2 TOTAL - PAYROLL BEt1 =FA X 44 ' 204740 FLKC 96 T CT AL VE HICLE 8 EQ L IP f 4!' — -- -- - - 33 2 ,718 9-b.. _ _ I C i A L 47 1 48. 42 NECESSARY EXPENDITURES SINCE LAST COUNCIL MELTING ISM, �z _ 54 - S6� ACCOUNTS PAYABLE JULY 9 ,19 8 4 - P 1984 CITY Of MAFLE60CD CHECK REG ?S7 ^R � CHECK NCO DATE AMOUNT VENDO ITEM DESCAIF Ti; 181247 L6/29/84 64.10 MICAS REALTY CCRP ESCRO` FBL 181 106S 06/25/84 6.645.10 FINN STATE TPFAS. MCTOK VEF LiC t 181M69 06129/84 438.:0 FINN STATE TREAS MCTCR VE}- LIC _ - - -- - 7 , PCF3.1.0_ 181NFC 06/2S/F4 S.22 I.S.P. UTITLTTTrc { 181 PC 06/29/84 2.40 he SOP UTITLTTIC' 181 N8f! __ 06129/p4 2 _ he SOP UTI TLITI- 1F1!!FC 06/2S/F4 2.40 I.S.P. LTITLTTI =. 181 N8R 06/2S/F4 2.4C A.lQ.p. UTI TLITT E c 181'% ar 06/2971P4 36.46 N. SOP . UTITLiTIF 181N8C L6 /29/F4 123aJS 11. S.P. UTITLI7IEw 1811 8C %612;/84 84028 w.S.p LT:TLTTIEc 181%1 06/2 125,37 �.S.P. UTITLITIL' x;6125 4 4925 1� S UTITL:TIF 1 1RFv L 6 1 25 /F4 6. 5 I.S.P. UT1TL:TIES 181 i6 /29/R4. 5A.3.1 11."Z-.p. UT'TL:TIrc� 181 ; Fo 0605IF4 265.C7 11.97•?. UTI TLITI 161 �,'FC L6 /297/84 353.53 �.S . r. U'r17 T; 'z 181 N8C 6 129/84 X54968 UTITLTTIE- 181P,Fr 0612S/Q4 67. ?0 UTITL.TIE.z 181 Oki i.6/297/F4 16.33 N. c. Q. UTITLITI'c 161 ^FC C6/29/84 292.23 •S•P. UTITLITI.- 181 r 06/29./84 106099 N.S.P. UTITLITIES 1 , ?13.15 191091 C 28184 1 SE�TOw PRINTING PPINTING 19946* 90 191125 C6 /2f /R4 175.00 CORPORATE RISK MAN; CCNTRP,CT FYM 175.00 1911 35 ,; 06/2F/84 1 MILLERS FAMILY MEAT r0 SUFFLIE� 1911 35 06/26 /R 4 F.36 MILLERS F r MILY ME I t R;) SUPPLY 1911 ?5 06/28/A4 5.13 MILLERS FAMILY MEAT r -'OC SUFPLi= S 191135 C6 /2f /P4 5.27 MILLE °S FAMILY FEAT FROG CUFFLIE< 1911 35 C6/28 8.40 MILLERS FAMILY. MEAT F.RO C cUFFLT-c 191135 06 /28I8 66 9 MILLERS F -MIL MEAT �Rt�G JUFPLTiS 1C7.33 ( 19116`4 06/28/84 35 .00 MEEHAN JAMES CANINE ALLOW4%.c f i t 1484 CITY OF MAFLEWIV Cf-ECK REGTSTER \ _ _ -- --- -CHECK . A C . T D A E- - -- -- _ �' aM 0 U _ __... YFNCC� - -- ITEM DESC*IPT'C * -. 1911 68 _.Cb1.2P/84.__... 2 - A0%ANCFO P AGING SEPW RFfjT4 L « 2700 191170 C6 /28 57956 ALEIhSCN SL`FPLT 57.56 + 191197 - 06/2 f 4 c. 1.72 Mti TORO ItvC SLPPL Es 51.72 # .1912 24 C 6/22f 84 2290C TO?IN ..CHEF YL REF LND 2?. .DC # - SUPPLIES 1912.75 06/28/84 17,;.0 W ^LFES FROG 1 ?.00 191227 C6/28/R4 59. FO BUSF ='ND MARY LMT CLASS 59. SC t 191228 06/2E/84 8000 CHINANDER ALLEN Rr_FLt. 8.0"0 1912 29 06/28/84 23.03 CUFRE StiF C ON i E RE lND 23.00 * - 191230 06/28/84 59080 EBFRT KARESS EMT CLA%S 59 . p0 191231 C6/28/8 4 113.50 FED PROD ADVISORY HANDBOOK 113.50 191232 C6 /2F /84 427.80 FLFX:BLE ° ICE 9700L SLPPLT ZS 427.80 191233 06/28/84 23.L=0 FREY ALTS ON REFU-NC . 23. �► 191234 06 /2P /8 4 22.0^ FUDGE SUSI N REF LtiJ 22 0 J 191235 06 /28 /84 119.60 GERVA IS CLA RENCE EMT CLASS •� 119.60 191236 06/28/84 190000 JOHNSON CONTROLS SUPPLIES 1984 '"'Y CP 191237 4 2? L SEE Ca'= LL L� rr :-= ; L , ., 191 612f/F4 NYrR3 W IL _AM L ='f T. ''.Si =::C" 1 1 G. �C 1912ZQ - 6/21;04 16."5 N "TL SENT., :i�'y 16 5 191240 .:6!?F/ �.- �,1TITT R = n 1 -- L': 1912 4 /R4 JELTC T N G r h 191242 ;;6 /ZF /c4 r— TrT'.K_ J! YN:* ►�= �'; ":_ 191?4 ? r4 22 FL'i� 2 111 ?i_ M :.�/7'X 4" :L -HL CNAFL S : P J.:i..7 -;.�. T 45 nr 191 65 �6/2� /�4 1 ?' .. C 4�L4ZYM� ='"- Wi ,ST '� �L T : L" T: 13 C 191467 E6 /2F /F4 G7,3C 4 C F4 =F? CL' ; =L': 97.30 4 .f 191Q13 .J 6 /2FIp4 .1,3S?•'5 E =h7 J C Tic Tr =. 1y1pG5 :,h /?� /F4 '15._ . ^=� �"'� EC:F�. CF 4T CU L7 L�TI --- 1Gi 45 �6/2r� 45. ?''4Q� .7F H4T�= CG`S +�' "U �f ;5 191r) 4'i C6/2F 4 R5. N4 E%')1 T QJ'"K 7 4�T; ::LPPL:t:, F5,�4 r= 1984 CITY OF MAPLEWCOD CHECK REGIST -R �. CHECK h''. DATE.. _ AMOUNT _... VENDO- -- ITEM 0ESCP.IPT:0'4 191853 C6 /2F /14 _ _ __ 40.0'0 _BF:SSC -N FuPIP___cc SUPPLIES %E + 40.00 191C19 06 /2F /R4 189.50 CALCULATORS INC CALCULATCk 191C2C L6/28/R4 9F.50 CALLA STEEL SUPPLIES 98.50 191036 L6/28/F4 1 • 243. 50 CARE ANIMAL CONTROL AP4 N CStiTRCL 1.243.'0 z 1910 �� ? 0b/28/ _4 _ . 44.5 S .- CLEAN STEP RUGS RUGS CLE 4N� =0 _ 44.55 19105E 06128 /F4 74.50 CLUTCHSTRANSIMISSION SUPPLIES 74.50 191055 C6 /?8 /g4 18 COPY OUDLICATING DUPLICATING C DST; � 19.1E 191056 L IF3.31 COLLINS ELECTRIC REPAID 1 Q3.31 + 191 C9 ., C6 128 /84 12.9 r, a COUNT .Y CLUB S l P PL'r c 191 C90 L6/28 / ?4. 2019 COUNTRY Ci_UF SUPPL : =S 191 090 CWE /F4 28.54 CO NTRY CLUB SLPFL IE S 43.6-3 * 191 ^30 06/2EfF4 24.F0 CALCO SUPPLIES 24.90 191035 46/2F/84 p F2..� L' DALEY P SUPPL,Ec 62P.00 * - 191070 06/2b/t4 76.56 CON STP=ICHEA GUNS SUPPLIES BEN r7 c, 1984 CITY OF MAFLEWOCG C REGISTER �:.. IC ...CHECK- N v. .. 0 ATE E _._. 4 N 0 U h . r O =. - .. V �. N V O=. . -- .. I TE N C ES C 4 I T:0 76.56 191075 _ Ob /�F /R4 83,22 CRESSER INC SUPPLTEc 83.22 191EC5 06 /26/84 8 00 EAST CCMM /FAMILY CTR CwtiTR?B�T46 8 JO 0 191E40 C6/28184 63.67 ELECTRONIC CENTER SLPPLlE 63.67 _ 191 60 - C6 /28 /�R4 _. - _ EMBER TSON JAMES KcI MB'JRS - F . 2': 191E9" L6 /2E /R4 6.00, EVANS BARPY TRAVEL. T N * 197E5C_ 16/2F/84 - - -- -- 22.00 EV.ANS £ARC. VEHICLE ALL06� % 231 .L J • *ffft 191FC5 06/2E/84 8 00 0 FAUST OAN'EL TRAVEL TR p' IN 7 &M3 191F30 06128fF4 - 98.94 FEDERAL LUMBER CO SUPPLIES 98. 191G44 66/28/84 1 GENERAL TIRE S,rRV �Tc c o r ..UF 1 9212.48 191645 ..06/28/84 248.76 � ' r _ GOCOY_AR TIF_ C( SU PPL IES 191G45 x6/2 8.184 116. 6 GOCOYEAR TIR= CC SUPPLIES 365.62 ,t. 191648 06/28/84 486.00 KIREN GNEi FFOG INST�Ll- T R 486.00 * - 191G58 06/28/.84 16.35 GREW JANET TRAVEL TRIINING ..r.�...,�,r�.. --�... -...mow +war.. -.� • �,...� .�w. fit_. ' .- �.ri�.I.+.... .`. _ .�....... �. ..�.. 1984 CITY OF NAFLE6300 CHICK REGISTER _. EHECK N 0. DATE - -- - -- - 4MOUN.T..._.._. - - - -' - -.. VE NDOR - -_ ITEM DES R•�T•. %. l: ._O'� 191 G58 06 /28/84 19. R6 GREW JANET TRAVEL TR LIN r �G 191G58 -- -- 06/2P/�4 .._ _. 1.5.80 ..- _.... JANET- - RLIMBUt�S 52.01 •tf * *f 191N30 06/28/84 24. ^0 ! EWLFTT PACKARD CC SLBSCF7F71C 24.00 ; 191J30 .� C6/28/84 11?400 JgJ TF CP!± TES TROPHIES 113.00 * , 191J45 -' 06/2E1 4.Q5 JCLLY SzUPPLIES 4.95 191K55 L602F/84 P6.88 NNCX LUPPER SUPPLIES 19105 u6 /2F /A4 5t..v6 KNOX LUMBER SUPPLIES 137.74 191L16 C6/2e/84 1 *285.50 LATS FANNIGAN KLY CCNTRACT FYM 191L1 E 06/28/84 225.; 0 LAIS Q-%NN:GAN KLY CuNTRACT FYI! 19106 L6 /2E /E4 422.25 LAIS BANK GAN KLY CCNTRACT FYM 1 99?2.75 : 191L22 06/28/84 26.20 LA MOTTE CHEMICAL SUPPLIES 26.20 191L?8 06/2R1 R4 ?5.00 LAAG CANINE ALLOW "4CE 35.0C . RTCHIRD 191MI4 06 /2F /R4 93.49 MAPLEWOOD REVIEW PUB Li SHIhG i 1911'14. 06/2E/84 14.00 MAPLEW00C REVIC6 SLBSC+'F1 ?C"J 191m14 06/2E/94 31.46 MAFLEWOOL RcVIEW PUBLISH 138.95 r 1� 01 •n. UT - 6• ' - . '4 .,. .-'.Y Vv .. -. r.o - :�-. �. :.r-r. >.' -v..e • 'n /: > - .s - ... v. >.:ir.• .- •.7'a . "- . * -. * .. r. _ . , .. - _ i H .. ; i � r ww.r•. .r� ri wrw+ - w . < '� ... •_. •• � .r, r+ - -.w • t fY t � �+ N . i. .. I+ .l Rrr w j s Y _ . -' r ' p. r.I r • • +. I I L / r � - .rte -� .. . 1984 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER L NC. C_ATE AMOUNT _ ------- .._.._..... - - -.. YE A C_C - _.._. ITE r CSC q IF l T c•. �.. - _CHECK _ 191M87 06/28/84 -- -_.__ 1 :300.00.._...__ M* P oH. INDUSTRIEc - SUPPLIES 191M�T 06/2E/84 1,C�$3.30 PSF.H. IAOUSTRIIES SUPPLIES � 2.383.00 t 191N04. 25000 _. NATL ASSOC OF SUBSCRIPTION 25.00 191N3^ C6 /2P /84 1 NCRTH ST PAUL CITY UTi LiTIE 191 06/2P/p4 _ _.. 53,10 1..CRTK ST P AUL CITY UTILITTE .�3n 1,372.3C 191N.5C 06/2E/84. 1.60 AORTHWEST "Rh FELL T 191N55 �6 12E /$4 _ ?9.00 WTNWTST;RN £ELL TELEPHOti, 1911 5� L6 /?E /8 4 ?R. NORT4WES RN BELL Tc � ^ 191tv5� 06/2F/R4 ?9.u0- NCFTHWE -ST ^RR F LL TEL .PhOt�_ - 191A5C C6/2F/�4 23.30 NCFT�+it rS7 R1 FELL T r- 191N.5C 06/28/84 38.90 NOFTHWEST_RN BELL Tc.L =PHC' ^ 191N5C 06/28/4. 1950 NCRTHWEST' RN BELL TELE EPH3�'r� 191 Ayr 06/2f/84 A 0FTHw2;-ST RN £ELL T - -- 191t5 C G!�/28I84 ?9.00 NCFTHwEST"RN FSLL T:LEP HC�i= 191ti5 - ^ Lb /2F /R4 35�?.01 �C�fTNyEST "RN PELL TElcPH 191N5C OE/28/F4 47.30 AGFTHwES7� RN QE LL T= LcPHON 191N5C L6 /2EIF4 13.1? J tOTHivEST�RN FELL T`LEPNC "1 191N5C 06/28/84 115.45 NORTHWEST EELL TEL} PwONT ^ 191N5_ G6/?.8184 - _... ° 67. 05 - - -- N1^FTHWEST RN £ELL T_L::PH0%Z 191 _ G6/2E/84 p9�_5 ACFTH "'ST RN FELL TELEPHON- 891 .Q8 i *ti *i 191 NB d6 / - - -- 62, -- - - -. �'•S *�' LTT LITIE S 191 NRC' - D6/28/$4 1 ,187.79 N. S.a. UT L'TT" S �` 191N8 ^_ ., D6 /cE /R4 3 53 c p N.�. � • ES UTIL T ITI ` LTT Li 71L S 191 �j n 06/2,/84 2.4" A.S.P. LTILITIE S 191 A S^ 06/28/84 2. 3.53 F.S.P.. N.S.P• UTi L?TIE S 191NSC � G6 /2f / ?4 L'6 /2E/P4 102.42 _ !�..S.P. UTI L T S 191 �C C6/2, /84 18.25 I.S.P. UTI L TI_ S 191 NRO 06/28/84 69OC7.50 N.S.°• UTILITI =S T* C 191N80 Q6/28fR4 81.Q8 N.S.p. U.�L:7I_.. E T r` 191 NBC .. �7b/28/84 _ 89.31 f�.S.P. C U . T I 11 TI � S 191 *gC 06 /2E /8 4 92.25 N. S. .P. UTI L ?TIE S 191NSo 06/2P/R4. _ 91.23 N.S.P. UT"&LTTI =j 191N8 06/28184 146.79 N.S.P. UTILITIES UTILITIES 191N80 06 /28/84 40.87 A.S.P. UTI VTI ES 191 NEC G6/28/84 _._ .._ �►.:.P. UTILITIES r 191 NFO C-6/28/84 49.88 24.67 N.S.P. N. S.�'. UTIlTT1_.. c - 191N80 06/28184 Aw P,4 9:� F .1984 CITY OF PAFLEWD CHECK REGISTER CHECK AC. DOTE AMOUNT _ VENDOR. ITEM DESC 14. N 1 191NP0 C6 /2F /P4 4.25 1►. S.P. UTILITIES 191 NSC 06/28/84 - __ - -- - 4. ?5 -- - W.S. F. _: - - UTILITIES - -- 191 A8n 06/2P/84 24.49 UTI LTTIE S 191% C6I2F/84 49 . A• c.P. UTILITIES 191 NEC C612F194 .119.15 1►._ UTILTTIc� 191 06/28/84 4.25 h.S.o. UTILTTI =S 191Ngn 06/2F/84 6.C'5 %*S.P. UTILITIES 191 N P .► [�.S.Q. UTILITIES ?91 NRn 06/2F/F4 15.05 .S. . UTI LI TIE 9 191NSO U6/2E/84 75.15 K0S -0p. LTIL:TIFS 191NE'? L6/2k/84 17912 I N .S•P. UT 191N8C C6 /2E /R4 21 .R1 I.S.P. UTILTTI= S 191N80 06/28/84 462.^2 h *S.P. UTILITIES 191N8t 06128/84 87 _ _l1.S.P LIT IL1TIE.S 191^8r. C6/2E/84 185.21 I.S . UTIL'TIE% 191%8n 06/28/84 331906 N.S.P UTILITIES 191 NRr 06I2fI 81. 11• SOP UTI L ITIE 191NMn - - 06/2t/�4 15.55 A.S.P. UTILITIES 191N8�? 06/28/84 151 *64 11.S.P• UT LTTI_S . 9 t 942 9 30 191 C25 C6/2f/84 56070 CFFICz PRODUCTS OFFICE SLFPL1 S 56, "70 " 191C4C - _ L'6/c8/34 7_.E1 t n H U DOMih_Ch E US. SLFFL1 tS 78.61 � 191051 06/28/84 160 CLSON MAP VEL REFLihu 16,00 . 191052 06/28/84 24.00 CLSON PEARL REFLND 24.0 0 191P29 06/28f84 139. R6 PENNSYLVANIA OiL SUPPLIES VEH AB 139.96 191r-45 C6 /2F /84 74.00 FITNEY Bc4ES CCNTRrCT FYN _ 74.0 0 191 60 C6/28/84 1 9 000000 FO_TMASTER PCSTAGE 1 *_. - - 0 1984 CITY OF MAFLE60CD CHECK REGISTER CHECK NC. C_A.TE AMOUhT VENDO? _. _ ITEM DESCPIPTi _ 191F64 06!28/84 - -- _ FRETT.KER JCSEPF __ . TRAVEL TR4ZhT�,C 7.79 iff *sus - 191F66 06128184 225.00 FRCTECT - AIRE SUPPLIES � H SUPPLIES VEH 191066. Q6/.�8I84 - - 25.00- _ 225.00 FROTECT -AIRE FRCTFCT -AI SUPPiiES Lct� 191 P6E 06/28/84 225.00 191 R0 4. .06128184 _ __ 1.69 - RADIO SHACK _.. SUFGL,. - 1 .69 # 191025 06/28/84 6.52 5 RED OWL COUNTRY RE0 OIL COUNTRY STR STR SUPPLIE SUPPLIES - 191R25- 191 R 25 _ . ^bI2F/84 _ __ C6 /28 !84 _ - -- _.b.1 _ ._ 6.1 5- ... FEL OWL COUNTRY STR SLFPLIES 6.52 191434 06/28/.84 - ._ _._._ _ . 2.05 RICHARDS _ SUP ?LIES SUF °L:E� Z 1914.,9 1,6/28/84 2 q5- • 5.'6 RICHARDS FICHAPDS SLPPL'sES 1 91435 191 P 7 9 G6 /2F /R4 Cb/28184 F. ^S RICHARDS SUP PLIES 191R39 iu6/28/84 12.00 RICHARDS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 191R39 06 /2F /F4 6.15 6. ^9_ RTCHARDS FICFAG�JS SUPPLIES 191Q?S 191839 06/28/F4 - -. C6128/R4 _ 2. FICHAROS SUPPLicS 41.03 191 R 5'� Rn.N..SAXON FORC _.._ SUPPLIES 191SC2 06/28/84 4.10 S$0 LOCK &SAFE OFFICE SUFPL - ' - 7 t • - -4 *10 •mot *�f - 191Sr5 06 ./28/84 21.5 S a T OFF T :C F S 9 T OFF TCE OFF ICE OFFICE SUPPL :' -` 191 SO5 191S( 06/28/84 06/28/g4 40.28 _ 7920 -S S ..g .T. OFFICE' OFF IC:. SU� .� 191SC5 8 /P4 06/2 E/E4 _.. . 9'.14 S B T CFF ?CE c & T CFFTCE CFF ICE SLFPL'C: OFFICE- SLFFLi= ` - 191 S05 06/28/8.4 16.00 5.52 % S a T CFF SCE._... CFF IC SI.FPL'' ` - . - 191Sf'S 191 SOS C6 /2F /P4_ 06/28/84 .. - - -. . _.._.:. 10.''8 - - S 8 T OF - - -- - -' -- OFF ICE SUr T _1. 191SO5 / 8/84 L6 2 27.80 S 9 T OFFICE OFFICE SUrPLIE`. ' L k i I CArr 1N F ALL0i :.NC c- FUEL COI FUEL 1 o32R.20 FL EL CIL FLEL CIL FUEL 1984 CITY OF MAFLEUOCD �� L FL�L CHECK REGISTER CIL 191S84 06128 /84 3. 0 hT A MOt! _._. __.. ._.__�ENnn = . - - -- - -__ ITEM LESCPIP710N 35.00 * = 191SC5 U6/2E/P4 1.20 S 8 T OFFICE OFFI CE SL F PL + c 0b /28/84 22 *04 06128/84 - - -- - 24.27- - ___- %.._.g ..T. CFF ICE _ -.._ . _._ _ __. OFF ICE SL F_ FLI ::S _ _1915"5 __ 191SC5 __ -_ 06/28/84 20 +97 S 9 T OFFICE OFF IC" SLF'PLI =S 16.25 191S05 06 /2EIp4 59 S 8 T OFFICE OFF ICE SUrPL .ES �S 197590 191 S ^5 X6/28/ F4 29 _S 8 T OFFICE CFF ICL SL F- PL : SUFER ICA 191 SC5 06/28/84 27.54 S 8 T OFv ICE GFF:CE SZFPI:ES f 191S05 06/28/R4 3.24 S 8 T OFFICE OFF , "CE 'T BUFFE . S ( 191 S9C 06/ 84 _ _ _..- '1. R9.- _ � .8 T OFFICE _ VF IC^- SLFPL I iSz __ 57.90. SUFERAMERICA 55.43 f 06/ W4 31.50 SUFERAMERICA C C6/2E/84 14.50 SUFER AME'R CA 191 S9 06 128 184 R,25 SUFERAMERICA 191 S9r 06/28/84 28.00 SUPER AMEQ I CA .` SE 1.91599 06/28/84 191S42 06/28/S4 5 SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MN SUPPLIES 5916 191S55 C6/2P/84 99000 SPECIALTY RADIO SUPPL TES 191S55 06128/84 97 +90 SPECIALTY RACIC SLPPL?ES 191558 C6/2E/84 310,610 ST PAUL CITY CF REP AIP M - NT ( 191558 06/28184 '14.00 ST PAUL CITY CF REPATR NA IKT 191S5R C6/28I84 10.x^ _ _ .ST. PAUL CITY OF A _pb :� �'�' i %T 191S58 06 /2F /Q4 430905 ' ST PAUL CITY OF REPAIR REPF I M� ihT IN 191558 C6 /2F /Q4 291 , ST ST PAUL. CITY CF PAUL CITY CF R EPAIR M4 TNT 191S58 _ /28 /R4 27'1.45 CArr 1N F ALL0i :.NC c- FUEL COI FUEL 1 o32R.20 FL EL CIL FLEL CIL FUEL ')IL FUEL �� L FL�L uIL FUEL CIL 191S84 06128 /84 3. 0 cTEFFF i SCOTT - OIL FLEL 35.00 * -- - CIL FUEL OIL FEEL OIL FUEL 191S9 0 0b /28/84 22 *04 SUFERAME RICA 191590 06/ZE /84 22.62 SUPER A"ER : CA 191 S9^ Q6/28 /A4 30 +45 SUFERAMEC ZCA 19159C 06/2F/84 16.25 SUFERAMERICA f. 191590 06/28/84 65.88 SUFERAMERICA ' 197590 06/22 - 12 SUPERAMER 191 c9n CE /2E/8 37.51 SUFER ICA ( 191 S9Q 06128184 93.Q1 SUFERAMER CA 191 590 06/28/84 53.11 SUFERAMERI Co' A - 191 Sgo 06/2b /84 21 ,79 SUPER 4MEQ ICA ( 191 S9C 06/28/84 7.2R SUPERA NEP ICA 191S9.0 06/28/84 _.� . __ 57.90. SUFERAMERICA - 191S90 06/ W4 31.50 SUFERAMERICA 191S90 C6/2E/84 14.50 SUFER AME'R CA 191 S9 06 128 184 R,25 SUFERAMERICA 191 S9r 06/28/84 28.00 SUPER AMEQ I CA .` SE 1.91599 06/28/84 87.72 SUFERAMERICA CArr 1N F ALL0i :.NC c- FUEL COI FUEL Zi I L FL EL CIL FLEL CIL FUEL ')IL FUEL �� L FL�L uIL FUEL CIL FLEL AIL FUEL OIL FUEL OIL FLEL CIL FUEI. CIL FUEL OIL FEEL OIL FUEL OIL FUEL CIL P 4- 1984 CITY OF MAFLEW000 CHECK REGISTER .` CHECK N^. DATE eMOUNT VENDO TTtM OESCc: -r n, 191 S9C 06 68.47 SUFERA MFR CA FUc L OIL 19159^ 06/2t f84 9.0^ SUFER A'MrO TCA FLEL OIL 191S9r C6 /26 / R4 33.49 SUrERAMERICA FLEL OIL 191 S9C C6 /2f /84 1 8. ^0 SUFER A NEP TCA FUEL CIL 191SQG 06/28/84 100-0 SUFERA.MEa.CA FUEL CIL l 191 1 90 U6 /2P /R4 9 SUFERAMER FUEL OIL 191 S90 06/28/84 1609D SUFER AM= R I SA FUEL ^ ;L 19159^.- - -.. (36/.28/84 13.n0 SUFERDhEICA FUEL OIL 191S90 L6 /28 /84 19.?0 SUFERAMFOICA FUEL OIL 191590 06128/84 15.26 SUFERAPERy CA FLfL. �1L 191S9C C6 /28 /R4 14.7R SUPERAMr ^ ?CA FUEL CIL 191S9 06128/R4 14 SUFERAMER iCA FUEL OIL 191S90 06/28/84 90 -00 SUFERA Pot FICA F LPL CIL 871.48 • # # # ## 191T3r " C6 /2p /P4 66.02 TARGET SU°PL_ES 191 T30 C6/28184 I 89 TARGET SUPDLiE: 191TH 06/28/84 3 ,.U1 TARGET SUPFL:ES 1 C7. R2 191 T85 06/ 2818 4 456o6O TURNAUIST PAPER CO S UP P L IES 456.00 191T93 06 /2E /R4 43075 TWIN CITY FILTER FILTERS CLEAN`-) 191T93 16/2k/84 15036 TWIN CITY FILTER FILTE?S CLEF N—ED 55.11 191 U1 5 06/28 /R4 5.x;0 U.S. CIVIL SUB SCRZPT IC's 5 00C 19105E C6/2E/64 6 1 2!n UNIFORMS UNLIFITED UNIFORMS 6,000 191UF6 Q6 60 00 UNIVE RSAL MEDICAL MAD SUPPLIES 6. ' 191 V5n C6/2F/84 101005 VIRTUE PRINTING OrF IC- SLPPLI S t 101 005 , .._..191 V 1.0 ____ _._ �b12F1�4 _ �_..__ _ __-- - -_.__ -5-.. RQ _ _ -._.- - -- . --WAIL & -VAHt - - - - -- . _ ,.FF IC&L S UFP&. S 1984 CTTV OF F+AFt =�+lfJ e}�CC " k . C -TE . * ** * 191 W 5 1911 191 w 191:;7" '191 191 vi I � 191 c: 19 175 L612Q /Q4 „1�I2ri 2 1 4 - All t Ir-4 /cr > � 57. 1 3 • ='J �2� ^.�4 4�. - J 4- • • I 17 c CV T_a V NO .T �GCr T R "�"TH : %L WHIT - C C)C -- .- L`_ 6T-KF: LO 'A:T- LL w NFi �L C v T1 - LI w F LC:TC LL 1 � •+ A , T A 1 r + ; h r -. T CT Y,. tr •� T -..C Y -- •• L az - FQ y ^LL.^ �► L - ��ti T:.� r5.3 5 2 r 67.7 -2 1. C FUN (71 TJT =L FU J3 T„T.L 12 ,513. ,C FU "1 32 r I T 1 45. ^5 FU' *C z4 T TtL 15 FUN 4? TCTIL 462.5 FUAC 5:. TCT L 31 rUNn 65 TOT_L. 4) . a r11a! 75 TOT "L 3 381a! G FU n 97 T - T " L 9 • 76 1 ? I'll FU I... q2 T f%T AL 1 •'�J� •�'� FUN 9 4 TC. TIL �U%t 96 T -T'I 112 3S5. `6 T(TfL �`TDIC� PLS I 1�� �J Tli �i`�� L;?� ��' � L,RE�,1 I Ol�_^�I� 'rJ�S 1 � •+ A , T A 1 r + ; h r -. T CT Y,. tr •� T -..C Y -- •• L az - FQ y ^LL.^ �► L - ��ti T:.� CITY 0P HAPLT WOCC PAYROLL- CHECKS R;GISTER CYCLE 8012 CHECK DATE 06 -29 -84 PERIOD ENDING 06 - 22.84 PAGE 1 LEFT -K EMPL -NO EMFLOYEE NAPE CHECK -NO AMOUNT CLEARED ~' 0002 484369671 BERM LOIS N 0625 -00001 45900 ;3 : 0032 206242018 EVANS BARRY R t 1 X247.96 t f ;a 17002 1 9706.96 • r. {i010 4 736644 74 JAHN DAVID J 062 5 -00003 96.35 h' 0010 473900147 JOHNSON GREGORY R 062 5-0000 4 O.CO t x 001 G 469 5865 23 SWANSON -JR. LYLE E 062 5 -00005 525.51 ) . .... .. ,l �' i 0010 622.26 t :;- � - 0012 357340166 CUCE. LARRY J 0625.00006 1 75.61 a 0012 470520124 CCFERTY KATHLEEI► M 0625 -00007 406.74 t 0012 471400908 ZUERCH13R JOHN L 0625- 00008 103.94 0012 686.25 0021 469501078 FAUST DANIEL F 0625.00009 l,047.25 t f . - 0021 469743719 MEYER NANCY E 0625 - 00010 415.30 t 0021 1 *462.55 . _. _._.. --- - - -• -- - - -- -- - ...__. - - - -._. _ _.___.... _.__._.__...._. - -.._ 0022 469200614 t-ACEN ARLINE J 0625.00011 7L905 : 0022 390444446 PATHEYS ALANA K 0625.00012 546.45 t �.. 0022 4767044 32 MOELLER MARGARET A 0625-00013 0000 c x ) I � 0022 473327550 VIGNALO DELORFS A 0625 -00014 464..88 0022 1 9 720.4 E 0031 471322198 aUREL IUS LUCILLE ' E 062 5 -0001 5 994.68 �..' 0031 474264816 SELVCG BETTY C 0625.00016 521.02 .1 J 1 * 515.7 0 ; 0033 477288389 GREEN PHYLLIS C 062 5 -0001 7 580.24 0033 472244994 FEPSLEV PATRICIA A 0625.CC018 158.97 t f •' 0031 4 KELSEY CONN IE L 0625%-00019 1 50.41 t f 0033 476269815 SCNADT JEANNE L 0625 -00020 73.61 __ ... - - -�- -- - -•_ - - -_ - -- -.- 0033 468364435 VIETOR L.CRRAIAE S 0625.00C21 444.E4 t f ..: OQ33 1 •507.87 s 0034 474097528 STCTTLEMYER EDITH G 0625 -00022 0000 t x f s . + �.:,. 0034 ' ,£. ; 0041 184440036 EASTYR DEBORAH A 0625 -00023 19 7.1O t ) 0041 468461717 COLLI NS KENNETH V 0625 1,029,92 t ) ,i 0041 475323183 NELSON ROBERT 0 1625 -OGE25 920.73 sr• 0041 477227636 CMATH JUY E 0625 -00926 387.10 t �• 0041 471502356 AICHIE CAROLE' L 0625- 00 027 422„78 t i 0041 4 68 60.29 34 EVE k0SEN JOANNE M 0625 -00028 506958 t ) 7 0041 3 X464.21 IJ %i 5 7 7f �. 0043 469441789 _ GRAF DAVID M 0625 -00056 751* 72 t ) 1 14 0043 - 469820466 HEINZ STEPHEN J 0625 -00057 842.35 1�v." 0043 -392760009 KARIS FLINT D 0625 -00058 729.94 t d CITY OF MAPLEWOOC 0043 PAYROLL- CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8012 CHECK DATE 06 - - PERIOD ENDING C6 -22 -8k PAGE 2 1' , CEPI - NC EMRL -NC EMFLOYEE NAPE 0043 473567791 CHECK -NC AMOUNT CLEARED 0625 -00060 0042 47.7411364 ARNOLD DAVID L 0625. 00029 913.52 CAROL M 0625.0+0061 0042 471402115 ATCHISON JOHN H 0625 -OJ030 X335.14 t 1 0625 - 013062 0042 476721577 EAIIICK JOHN J 0625 - 00031 551 03 t ) ' 0625 -00063 0042 .469689167 BOWMAN RICK A 0625 - 00032 673.87 RCHERT E 0625 -00064 0042 468461930 CLAUSON DALE K 0625 -00033 817996 t ) 0625 0042 476446119 CREGER RICHARD C 0625 -00034 909.17 t 1 "3 0042 470267887 GREEN NORMAN L 0625• -00035 942.176 t 1 � -- 0042 392240565 HAGEN THOMAS L 0625 -00036 868.79 ALFRED C �r+{ 0042 469568516 k Atlmr'G KEVI N R 0625 -00037 851 .50 ( ) 1+=, 0042 473604916 FEFBERT MICHAEL J 0625mO0038 830.47 t ) ,13 0042 472222231 KORTUS DONALD V 0625 -00039 516.12 t 1 14 , 0042 471563591 LANG RICHARD J 0625 -00040 888091 ( ) (. 0042 468181347 KFULTY JOHN J 0625 -00041 913.52 t ) Ile' 0042 474607686 MEEHAN•JR JAMES E 0625 - 00042 769.96 t ) }: ! 0042 471627417 METTLER DANIEL 8 0625 -OOC43 0000 t X ) ;. 7 (» 0042 469442063 POFSCHTER RICHARD M 0625.00C44 828.28 0042 476340990 MGREL LI RAYMOND J 0625-00045 628.11 0042 468462884 PELTIER WILLIAM F 0625 -00046 848.34 t ) a 0042 4705204 57 SKALMAN DONALD W 0625 - , 00047 800.09 0042 47,3548226 S T AFNE GREGORY L 0625- 00048 _ _ 849.40 t ) 0042 471721204 STEFFEN SCOTT L 0625 -00049 613.66 t 1 �=.+ 0042 471 500251 ST 1LL VERNCN T 0625 -00050 794.00 itR 0;I42 .471629204 STCCKTQN DARRELL T 0625 -00051 7 2.12 t ) 0042 471602052 THCMALLA DAVID J 0625 OG052 528.09 t ) � 0042 475363333 WILLIAMS DUANE J 0625 -00053 _ 755.22 t 0042 474260130 ZAPFA JCSEPN A 0625 -00054 761.08 � 1 l . 0042 19.480.41 0043 475548434 EECKER RONALD D 0625 - 00055 915.56 �. 0043 469441789 _ GRAF DAVID M 0625 -00056 751* 72 t ) 1 14 0043 - 469820466 HEINZ STEPHEN J 0625 -00057 842.35 1�v." 0043 -392760009 KARIS FLINT D 0625 -00058 729.94 t 1 0043 476401388 LEE RCGEF 6 0625 -00059 861.79 t 1 'I 0043 473567791 MELANDER JCN A 0625 -00060 814.15 - t 0043 469360911 NELSON CAROL M 0625.0+0061 -� 1043 471504316 RAZSKAZOFF DALE E 0625 - 013062 866.G4 �..,! 0043 471564801 RYAN MICHAEL P 0625 -00063 _ 877.76 t ) 0043 474486071 %CRWERK RCHERT E 0625 -00064 936.82 t ) 0043 469502201 YOLNGRTN JAMES G 0625 758. F6 t ) 0043 99277.64 + ' 0045 471401978 EMEERTSON JAMES M 0625 -00066 894.55 ( 1 0045 472242227 SCFADT ALFRED C 0625 -00067 858.77 t ) � 0045 1975 0 C46 468401899 CAI - ANES AKTHCNV G 0625 -03068 902.59 t ) 0046 477627236 FLALGHDR JAMEE L 0625 00069 512.89 t 0046 376709873 MADELL RAYMOND M C625 -00070 451,04 1 -.. _ - r....- inn-- r,c:rn;::rrr-r.:- r:_....- _... ... 1 .... - C i CTfY 4F N4FLt16OCC P AYR CLL- CkrCKS REGISTER CYCLE B012 CI-ECK CATE 06 -29.84 PERIOlt ENCING 06 -22 -84 PAGE 3 DEPT -NO FMOL -NO EMPLOYE NAME CHECK -NO AMOUNT CLEARED _ � 0046 473807030 MARTIN SHAWN M 0625 -00071 451.04 0046 472365919 NELSON KAREN A 0625.00072 50201 .' 00 468600183 RAEINE JANET L 0625 - COC73 451.04 -' 0046 477700322 STAhNKE JULIE A 0625 -00074 467.71 t ! �8 3046 39738.62 0051 471440267 BARTA MARIE L 0,625 -00075 400.17 � f - 0051 473566872 HAIDER KENNETH G 0625 -00076 961.52 0051 5044831 74 WEGWERTH JUDITH A 0625 -00077 360 t ! ,. _. 0051 1 9721 •92 i• 1 _3. 0052 496308314 CASS _. _ PILL IAM. .... C 062 5.000 78 830.55 _. 0052 471526254 FREBERG RONALD L 0625 - -00079 629.11 t ) 0052 502544037 HELEY RONALD J 0625 -00080 667.67 0052 471501241 NAME MICHAEL R 0625.00081 678.37 t ) , 0!152 4683634 73 KLAUS ING HENRY F 0625 -00082 685.73 t ) U052 475 6014 31 LUTZ DAVID P 0625 -00093 5 96.73 t ! 0052 471500547 'EVER GERALD W 0625.00C84 713.78 t ) '1_ 0052 476904500 CSWALD ERICK D G625 -00085 378 *00 005 4663166755 FRETT JOSEPH B 0625 -00086 1 t ! ... 0052 47 ?241484 REINERT EDWARD A 0625.00081 639.21 0052 470346224 7EYLINoJR BARRY J 0625-40088 691.61 t ) 0052 - 475589777 ZAPPA JAMES M 0625 -00089 294.41 i:. .. 0052 ?. 0053 472683970 AHL -JR. RAY C 0625 -00090 788.04 t ) N 1 0053 472481010 ELIAS JAMES G 0625 - 00091 746.99 t ! 0053 1672461 09 GE ISSLER WALTER M 0625 -00092 61 7.42 00 501464671 LESSE LE JAMES T 062 5 -00093 _ 823.88 t 1 0053 475441688 _ PECK DENNIS L 0625.00094 746.99 0053 472662522 PRIEBE WILLIAM 0625 -00095 602.15 0053 4025e47 -, 005.4 473683775 LOFGREN JOHN R 0625.00096 469.81 ►' 0054 469,81 -1. 0n58 471562563 EREHEIM RCGER Y 0625 - 00097 632.67 t ) �;. 0058 477602582 EDSON DAVIO B 0625 -00098 647.48 t ! 0058 470541590 MULWEE GEORGE W 0625 -00099 632.38 .__ n. 0058 471501014 PACEAU EDWARD A +'625 -[0100 713.03 t ! I, 0058 468361720 MUTES ON LAVE RNE S C62 5 -ate 101 897.75 . 005 471365993 OWEN GERALD C 0625 -00102 679.95 t ) ��.. 005 R 4 9203.26 • 0059 476249760 PACDONALD JOHN E 062 5 -00103 51 6.49 0!159 475501000 MULVANEY DENNIS M 0625 -00104 703.51 JQS� 1 g 220.CC �► , i - 7f CITY OF MA FLE WOCC PAYROLL -CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE B012 CHECK DATE 06-29-84 PERIOD ENCI NG 06- . 22 -84 PAGE 4 oFol -NC EMPL -NO EMFLOYEE NAME CI-ECK --AC APOUNI CLEARED 1 0061 4 T 7301066 BRENNER LOI S J 0625 -00105 525.42 : 0061 468341993 KRUMM BARBARA A 0625 -00106 240.20 t ) N U061 473260389 CDEGA RO ROBERT 0 11625 -00107 984.6E t ) 0061 463582618 STAPLES PAULINE 0625 -00108 793.C4 t 1 i 0061 2 1 54 3.3 4 0062 4 ?492F762 ERENNER JAY A 0625 -00109 288900 J062 471447219 EURKE MYLES R 0625 -00110 639.21 1 006 2 4746081 82 GERMA IN DAVID A 0625 - 00111 646.42 t ) t - 0062 472303411 GUSINDA MELV IN J 0625 -00112 855.52 0062 474924209 }NAG PATTHEW J 0625 -00113 261.C2 0062 502544121 HELEY RCLANO B n-625-00114 _ 630.90 0062 468584797 NOFKI NS THOMAS C 0625 -00115 360o013 t ) - 0062 473969*784 FUfTER TONY 0625.00116 ?3.20 : 0062 471748313 LIBHAROT THOMAS 0 0625 -00117 0.00 ( X ) 0062 473503915 LINOORFF DENNIS P 0625 - 00118 581 095 d ) U062 473565506 MARUSKA MARK A X3625 -00119 619.04 ( ) t 0062 444444444 WEAL TODD 6 0625 - 110120 0000 _ t X I ; _ 0062 474078128 RASCHKQ ALBERT F 0625 -00121 0.00 t X I 0062 477646662 SA AOOU IST T1=0MAS J 0625 - 07122 01800 t X ) n062 47620 3439 SANTA REED E 0625 -00123 156.25 0062 4759041 89 TOWNLEY MICHAEL F 0625 -00124 360.00 0062 477881931 TO`NLEY PATRICK J 0625 -00125 308.28 0062 _ 475745266 WD TROY G 0625 -00126 308.18 y, 0062 69088.0 7 i 3i t a: 0063 47094CI 75 ANCERSON CHRISTINE M 0625 -00127 191.20 t I '` iz 0063 4758231 90 EAFTHOLMY JODY M 0625 -00128 0.00 t X 468988277 EESETH RONALD L 0625 -00129 ....._ 0.00 _._.. - -.. t x ) i.:; 006 3. 2704 83797 BLACK - WILLIAM J 0625-00130 357. E3 IJ 0063 472362015 BCFASH DONNA F 0625 -00131 0.00 ( X 1 • t ' 0063 47^962448 BRYANT ROBERT D 17625 -00132 70.00 t ) _ 0061 4744424 74 EUNKE RICHARD H 0625 -00133 0900 t X 0063 476924605 CASSEDAY ELIZABETH J 0625 -00134 194.22 ( ) 0063 473684976 CASSEDAY MARY K 062 5-00 135 181088 ( ) 0063 474829219 DIEBEL JERRY _ D 0625 -00136 0.00 t X ) '' ::. , 0063 474901922 CINCERMAN JA NINE M 9625 -00137 0.00 ( X ) .z� 0063 476721245 COLGHTY LINDA R 0625 -00138 133.25 ' 0063 476900508 CRAKE BARBARA J 0625 -00139 44.00 0063 469948845 FALTEISEK JAMES E 0625 -00 0000 X ) ,. 0063 472921037 FISCHER SUSAN M 0625 -00141 - 190.00 0063 473925557 FOWLER MARY K 0625 -03142 186..45 •� 0Q63 477989735 GALBRAITH CHRIS +-625 -OG143 184.00 t 1 or-63 469983628 GRAF MICHAEL 0625 -00144 184.e6 t ) 0063 StJ2825654 HAMM DEADRA M 0625 -00145 344.03 t 1 . , �,- 0063 475826712 HARPER JAMES 0625 - 017146 O,CO A X ) 67 .° 0063 474847811 NEIMERL CAROL 0625 -00147 0.00 t X - t.. i 00,3 476686996 NERBER KARIN J 0'625 -00148 0001 t X ) 0063 4739087 RS HOLLING�SWORTH LISA 0625 -00149 181.20 4 1 �.571 _.. ..._.... -._... _. _...._._. _.___. ....__..__.�.._._ - ......._ .._ '4 . 7 1 _+_..._..._ - 7 J J . \ CITY 00 MAPLFGOCC PAYROLL CHECKS RE CYCLE 8012 CHECK CATE 06 -29 -84 PERI00 ENCING 06 -22 84 PAGE 5 c QT - NO D ,. EMAL -N0 EMPLOYEE NAME CHECK -NC AMOUNT CLEARED 0 ±63 470881140 �ONNSCN JCSr'FH A 0625 - 001.50 0000 t X <� 0063 469806100 JOHNSON TERE SA L 0625 -00151 208.25 0063 469862799 KALE KAREN 0625 -00152 174.72 t ) 0063 470680548 MIELSA KARI J 0625 -00153 479.40 t ) a` 0 063 476743753 KLASSEN SUSAN 0625 -00154 158.O0 t I r' 0063 474743915 KOFTUS JAMES M 0625-00155 O.GO t X ) � 0063 468984615 KRUMMEL BECKY 0625=00156 209.35 t ) 0063 472484219 LE CLAIR MARY L 0625-00157 _ 164 -- �: - -- 0063 470 26 24 MAC DONALD EL I NE E C625-00158 0.00 t X l 0063 476923936 MAGILL JCSEPN r 0625 -00159 06GO t x ) 0063 473700729 M AHRE MICHELE A 062 5 -00160 1 6.00 t ) 470926903 MESSIN KATHLEEN M 0625 -00161 0.03 t X ) OC63 474966150 MIHELICIH CINDI L 0625 -00162 167.70 t ) :•• 01063 4695�333t]7 0 IS KA JANET A 0625m00163 - __... 1 ....._! - 0063 474745123 NOESEN CRISTIN A 0625 -00164 214.62 t 0063 473565827 CLSON ROBERTA J 01625 -00165 45.50 t ►E, 0063 4 72 8081 58 F ACGETT MARC TE C 062 5•QO l bb O.QO t X ) OC63 469849105 PFARSON LESLIE A 0625 - 00167 0000 t X ) 0063 472941928 FELTIER MICHAEL R 0625 -00168 0000 t X ) 0 063 468827763 RAGA MICHAEL F 0625 -00169 0000 _..__...._ c. x - - - -- - 1.. 0063 396604919 E INNI GER SARAH J 0625 -001 70 143.78 t ) 0063 477869067 SPANNFAUER DAWN M 0625- mOO171 0.00 t X ! 006i 469742645 SPANN Pit UER KATHLEEN G 0625 -00172 207.50 -. t ) 00.63 474845176 SPANNB`AUER MARTIN J 062 5-w00 0.00 t X ) 0063 469965435 SPANNBAUER SUSAN !. 0625 -00174 176,38 t ) 0063 4779201 70 STRAUS LAURA J 0625 -00175 -._.__ O.CO 0063 _ 476861186 S ULLIVAN JULIE 0625- C0176_ 1 75.31 t ) 1 006 3 471823921 SZI:REK JOANN M 0625 -001 77 0000 t X ) 0063 470626422 TAUBMAN DOUGLAS J 0625 - 00178 611.18 t ) +, 0063 470963203 6ALLACE JCN T 0625 -00179 214. 3 t I ' t 0063 396324246 4AR0 ROY G 0625 -00180 2 78.31 t ! 3: 0063 474606610 Z AHN WILLIAM A 0625 -00181 0000 1 X 1 U063 6.194.82 i �.:.t 0064 151440508 GREW JANET M 0625 -00182 522.99 - �:: 0064 471 384624 HORSNELL _ JUDITH A 0625 - 00183 258.57 t ! 0064 4745421 63 SOUTTER CHRISTINE 0625 - 00184 300.01 __...�...._� • 0064 1 •081.57 + 0071 389448993 CHLEBECjK JUDY M 0625 -00185 536.20 t 1 0071 470540551 CLSCN GECFFREY M 0625 -00186 951 •8 t ! 0,071 1 48 8.0E �• � 7 002 4 77627178 F KSTRAND THOMAS G 0625 -00187 647,55 t ) ►4 i . 0072 4756OP505 *JOHNSON RANDALL L 0625 -00188 521. t 1 0072 1,169.45 + �. 0 0 073 476090677 OSTROM MARJORIE 0625 -00189 799.55 t ) �• y 00 73 799,5 5 + 1 - r t-n r..� * - - - - -' -r: - -- -t - - . - -,_ - - CITY OF MAFL PAYROLL- CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE B012 CHECK DATE 06- 29-84 PERIOD ENDING 06 -22 -84 PAGE 6 DEPT -NC EMPL -NO EMFLOYEE NAME CHECK -%C AMOUNT CLEARED z v 0074 387520776 �EtiGEA 0 R OBERT .i 062 5 -00190 5 66.43 ._ ._. ....... _ '4 J074 566.43 • CO UNT Q ^190 G RA N0 T C 869653.73 II 00.31 4770580188 ANDERSON NORMAN G 0625 -00191 0001 483621318 BASTIAN GARY W 0625 - 00192 279.90 00 ^1 468200109 CREAVU JOHN C 0625 -00193 272.46 0091 472369335 MAI - DA MARYLEE T 0625 -00194 279.95 00.91 47705613.4 WASILUK MICHAEL T 0625 -00195 300.0^ t ) '"- • 00!1 1 ,260.92 � .. _ ._ �.. ``11 COUNT 00195 SUB TOTAL 87� 91 4. ES `• ` 184440036 BASTYR DEBORAH A 0625 -00196 280.78 392240565 HAGEN THOMAS L 0625 - 00197 6 - - 268181347 MC NULTY JOHN J 0625-00198"" . 4 , 234.77 - - GRAND TOTAL $ 99 - - +32 s i . ._._. _. - --.. .. _. .. _. .. ..... .. .. ... _. _. - ...... - ?J� 43s .ti ct 4.3 4e i .5f y .wu. 1 r I io•. j 73 74 MEMORANDUM �� C { � r � A ct i on J 1 -1 : -dnr E_ TO: City Manager M 0 (a e FROM. Finance Director RE: Designation of DeD i tory Date ----� DATE: June 28, 1984 PRnPn It is or000sed that American Savings and Loan Association be designated as an official depository for time deposits. RArmpni INn American Savings is the largest savings and loan association in the United States, with assets of $22 billion and equity of $898 million. American is a subsi di ar.y of Financial Corporation of America... a New York Stock Exchange Company, with headquarters in Los.Angeles. In 1983, the net income of American was $172.5 million. Minnesota's largest savings and loan, Tulin Ci ty Federal , had a net 1 oss of $14 mi 11 i on i n 1983. Presently, interest rates at American are about 1% higher than local financial institutions. If this differential continued over a year, an additional $1,000. of interest would be earned per $100,000 invested. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the attached resolution be adopted to designate American savings and Loan Association as an official depository for time deposits. DFF :1 nb RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED, that American Savings and Loan Association be and hereby is selected as a depository for time deposits of the City of Maplewood, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the deposits in the above depository shall not exceed the amount of F.S.L.I.C. insurance covering such deposits .unless collateral or a bond is furnished as additional security, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that funds in the above depository may be withdrawn and wire transferred to any other official depository of the City by the request of the City Treasurer or Finance Director, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this depository designation is effective indefinitely. E -v MEMORANDUM Action by C - - � ' . r , r, - ,. C.: ._ ..��_..._.._ Hf udf ' 1- n I TO: C i t M a n a e r Date .�.... .� y .9 t FROM: Assistant City Engineer ".' SUBJECT: Adolphus Street Trunk Sewer -- Project No.' 81 -4 DATE: July 2, 1984 The engineer and the contractor for the above —named project have certified the project to be complete. All lien waivers and affidavits of payment have been received and a warranty repair of one abandoned manhole is being completed at this time. Therefor.e,the contractor has requested final payment on the contract. The original contract with Orfei and Sons, Inc., the contractor, was for $206,025.69, This final payment will bring the total authorized for payment to $201,795.71. It is recommended that the council adopt the attached resolution authorizing final payment to the contractor. RESOLUTION DIRECTING FINAL PAYMENT ON CONTRACT WHEREAS, the city council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project No. 81 -04, Adolphus Street Trunk Sewer, and has let a construction contract, therefore, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, said project has been certified as completed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the project is completed and final payment on the con — structio6 contract is hereby authorized. MEMORANDUM t TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: PROJECT: DATE: City Manager Associate Planner -- Johnson Final Plat Edgerton Street and Bellwood Avenue Granada Home Builders Granada Second Addition July 2, 1984 �M :fiction by �� ♦•., � Endorse boo d if i e d_..� Re j ected� y •w. Re uest Approval of a final plat for fourteen lots of a 22—lot preliminary plat. All conditions of this phase of the plat have been met. Recommendation Approval of the Granada Second Addition final plat BACKGROUND 10- 10 -83: Council approved a preliminary plat for 22 lots, subject to the following conditions: Or 1. The. developer shall provide on —site ponding to control the rate and .volume of run-off to adjacent property to predevelopment levels. Drainage easements shall be provided for the proposed ponding. 2. A drainage easement and piping shall- be provided along lot lines to drain the nursing home parking lot to the southerly pond. 3. The second phase of the final plat shall not be approved, unless the council orders a public improvement project to extend water from Edgerton Street to Bradley Street. 4. Approval of a final grading, - drainage and utility plan before final plat approval. 5. Entering into a development agreement for public improvements before final plat approval, 6. The developer shall construct a temporary asphalt path on the west s i d e of Edgerton Street, from Rosel awn to the south edge of the plat on Edgerton Street. 2-13-84: Council approved a final plat for the Granada Addition, consisting of the three lots shown as phase one of the 22 —lot preliminary plat on page four. jc Attachments: 1. Location map 2. Prleiminary plat 3. Final plat (separate enclosure) 2 u LITTLE CANADA 1 0 oft"oft - a SELAWN AV, j37 (A [SUMMER AVIE.49 FEW Ly-o-ki AVE 04 yok 0 0 Kitt$# I ML ST. PAU L all-Oki, '-a 7 . 62 o L.oke LO CATION MAP Attachment One o Fad • t = -.7 do a - ftaw4ft 1 1 -p t I No 4f ;w 0-6 Oo j 6m MVSCL A61N 40W Z" 4VA-0 410 am do r r 'a pow 10 a 0 .4, Tft ft MLJ Up 46 to it r. f I aL -10 : ao 400 -p ASE- .-'a Ira 41 ob L f % or --Pp% -0, ar wA dlh, as op 7�00 ol ; o to o ddo®r 4b . -Jr • me 0 goo 0000' X N 000, or .. -" , �• - /jam - - ��'� / � L•� ` � I ; � i O ;� '� lee ID IQ 4, I t. _ _ _ - - ' PHASE /*.. o w If v i l �� !• . 46 i 1 �i — as or -ftri • fA July 3, 1984 MEMORANDUM En dor R e j e c t e d---. To: City Manager Barry Evans -4- .�..� From: Chief of Police Kenneth V. Collins Subject: Background Investigation of Liquor License Applicant Robert Hatten, dba Maplewood Bowl, 1955 English St., Maplewood A background investigation of Robert Hatten has been made. He has applied for an on -sale liquor license for Maplewood Bowl, 1955 English Street. Nothing has been developed that would preclude his being eligible for a liquor license. For your information. � KUC:cr cc City Clerk Liquor File CN# 84- 006588 91 "6 6100 cin OF rnnrLew000 APPUCATION FOR MOXICAMG UQUOR LICENSE THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN DUPLICATE. Whoever shall knowingly and wilfully falsify the answers to the following questionnaire shall be deemed guilty of perjury and shall be punished accordingly. In answering the following questions "APPLICANTS" shall be governed as follows: For a Cor- poration one officer shall execute this application for all officers, directors and stockholders. For a part- nership one of the "APPLICANTS" shall execute this application for all members of the partnership. EVERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED Robert A. Hatten individual- (Individual owner, officer or partner) for and in behalf o myself hereby apply for an On Sale Intoxicating Liquor License to be located at 1955 Egglish Street - the 14est 1/2 of vac, alley in lock 1 adi oi_nin¢ Ints - 14 -28 in the IM 1/2 of 0-mber St. vac, Lincoln park addition ( Give address and legal description) in the City of Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No. 95 of Maplewood. 2. Give app ' ts' to of birth: ( an A. '.fatten � _ 4 S ptem r 194f (Day) (Month) (Year) S. The residence for each of the applicants named herein for the past five years is as follows: _ 4970 9- Rf t Paria _v .44 (]rnaha N , ._683 9-2 912 S 152nd . Circle- Omaha- _ CIE AR 154 4. Is the applicant a citizen of the United States? yes+ If naturalized state date and place of naturalizatio If a corporation or partnership, state citizenship including naturalization of each officer or partner. r - Sri 7. If partnership, state name and address of each partner If a corporation, date of incorporatio _ _ - state in which incorpora - amount of authorized capitalization amount of paid in capi If a subsidiary of any other corporation, so sta no give purpose of corporatio name and address of all officers, directors and stockholders and the number of shares held by each Edgard J. Hatten (Name) ._ (Address) (City) If incorporated under the laws of another state, is corporation authorized to do business in this State? . Number of certificate of: authority If this application is for a new Corporation, include a certified copy of Articles of Incorporation and By -Laws. S. On what floor is the establishment located, or to be located? Gr qlmd —. 8. If operating under a zoning ordinance, how is the location of the building classified? Ccmwrcia Is the building located within the prescribed area for such license? 10. Is the establishment located near an academy, college, university, church, grade or high school? State the approximate distance of the establishment from such school or churc 11. State name and address of owner of building, '-12 7Q 101st St �I Uhite Bear Lake , ITT ; has owner of building any connection, directly or in- directl with a licant? No - Lessor and Holder of Contract only 12. Are the taxes on the above property delinquent? - 18. State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, have ever had an application for a Liquor License rejected by any municipality or State authority; if so, give date and details No 14. Has the applicant, or any of his associates in this application, during the five years immediately preceding this application ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked for any violation of such laws or local ordinances; if so, give date and detail 19. Furnish the names and addresses of at least three business references, including one bank refer- enc John Bedner. Bank of MUlard, 13259 11 prdAyP_,_ ha NE 68137 Ray Duerfeldt, CPA. 14810 M St., Omaba BE 68117 Thomas Whitm e, 10707 Pacific St., Oima a, IF 68124 20. Do you possess a retail dealer's identification card issued by the Liquor Control Commissioner which will expire December 81st of this year? Give number of sam Applied for 21. Does applicant intend to sell intoxicating liquor to other than the consumer? No 22. State whether applicant intends to possess, operate or permit the possession or operation of, on the licensed premises or in any room adjoining the licensed premises, any slot machine, dice, gam- bling device and apparatus, or permit any gambling therei No 28. Are the premises now occupied, or to be occupied, by the applicant entirely separate and exclusive from any other business establishment? 24. State trade name to be us Mao Bawl 25. State name of person that will operate store_._ &b = A., _ tten 26. Give Federal Retail Liquor Dealer's Tax Stamp Number lied for 27. � We license is being applied for, do you intend uor q y ehicle . deliver li b v N/A If go, state number of motor vehicle permits issued by Liquor Control Commissioner for current Y ear 28. If you are building a new building for the purposes for which this application is being made, please submit plans and specifications with this application. 29. Financing of the construction of this building will be as follows: N/A S0. Furnish a personal financial statement with this application. If a partnership, furnish financial state- ment of each partner. 31. Give description of type of operation if this is an on -sale license application (i.e. whether cock- tail lounge, nite club, restaurant, etc., specifying capacity by number of customers and any other pertinent data) Cocktail IDtmge 175 seats Night Club 400 seats Restaurant 50 seats 32. What previous experience have you had in the operation of the type of business described in the. answer to No. 31 above ?Vane 33. Applicant, and his associates in this application, will strictly comply with all the laws of the State of Minnesota governing the taxation and the sale of intoxicating liquor; rules and regulations promulgated by the Liquor Control Commissioner; and all ordinances of the municipality; and I hereby certify that I have read the foregoing questions and that the answers to said uestions are true of my own knowledge. q Subscribed and sworn to before me this (signature of Applicant) --may of June GERALC C. RUMMEL ROTARY PLM -onMpn C* l► Mb UST BE ACCOMPANIED WITH YOUR CHECK FOR THE FIRST LICENSE PERIOD. ` Y w STATE OF NEBRASKA ) SS. AFFIDAVIT COUNTY OF DOUGLAS ) ROBERT A. HATTEN, first duly sworn, on oath says: That he is the applicant who has applied to the City of Maplewood for an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License by signing an application for same on June 12 1984; That he has not had nor does he now have any interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly, in any other liquor establishment or liquor license in the State of Minnesota. Robert A. Hatten �'.� Subscribed and sworn t o. be f ore me th i s /3 •fir day of �vlIWAI ' , 1984 My Commission expires �plj',' Ai-f 1 �',r:tLa •Y'DiL'Jr0 srxVa= INC. ALL[GAN. 1MiCH. IN ' QUA PARTNERSHIP OR CORPORA? FINANCIAL STATEMENT (SHORT FORM) e.*41 NAM" r • �oATC) IUSINESS OR I l Ae p /'� OQ A� wlt lie 6 �oO OCZUPATION 1�- eclo� to c w�f DDRESS __ ____ s•�f'Q .B /pct d /k t TO (NAM9 Of BANK) FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING ADVANCES FROM TIME TO TIME ON BILLS. NOTES AND OTHER COMMERCIAL PAPER SIGNED OR EN• p0 fo v S Y THE UNDERSIGNED.' FINANCIAL CONDITION AS OF THE CLOSE D AND OF OBTAINING CREDIT GENERALLY, 14 E NDERSIGNE AKES THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT OF F BUSINESS ON TH6iDAY OF u�t tliC..r. ANO CERTIFIES TO THE ABOVE -NAMED BANK THAT THE INFORMATION HEREINAFTER SET FORTH IS IN ALL RESPECTS TRUE. ACCURATJE AND COMPLETE AND COR- RECTLY REFLECTS THE FINANCIAL CONDITION OF THE UNDERSIGNED ON THE DATE AFOREMENTIONED. (FILL ALL BLANKS. WRITING *NO" OR "NONE" WHERE NECESSARY TO COMPLETE INFORMATION). ASSETS LIABILITIES CASH ON HAND AND IN BANKS S NOTES RECEIVABI ir ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE MERCHANDISE LIFE INSURANCE —CASH SURRENDER VALUE kDo NOT .oCOUCT LOANS) C S BONDS (Give or-SCRIP. & VALUCS) S ' .L�vG NOTES PAYABLE TO BANKS (See sCNEOUI.0 NOTES PAYABLE TO OTHERS (SEE sCNtoULC) ACCOUNTS PAYABLE (sec sCElsoUt.c) TAXES DUE RENT DUE LOANS AGAINST LIFE INSURANCE ACCRUED EXPENSES TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES CHATTEL MORTGAGES REAL ESTATE MORTGAGES RESERVES (iTCM1290) OPERATING PROFIT COST OF GOODS SOLD: OTHER INCOME: TOTAL INVENTORIES 13E- GINNING OF PERIOD 4 ADD: PURCHASES DURING PERIOD i 1 �' ' ► t CASH DISCOUNTS RECEIVED OTHE CURRENT ASSETS (rTtMrzc Q TOTAL OTHER OTHER LIABILITIES (rTCMizt) DEDUCT: TOTAL INVENTOR'"" AT CLOSE Or PEItlop TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS REAL ESTATE (see scs4muLE) f A, f MACHINERY. FURNITURE AND FIXTU (usto IN suSltfcss PREPAID EXPENSES OTHER ASSETS (rTSwusc ) trG TOTAL 94 TOTAL LIABILITIES i NET WORTH (if Nor INCORPORATED CAPITAL STOCK (ir INCORPORATED) PREFERRED -SHARES=..�.. .__!»AR COMMON ,._.SHARES i PAR SURPLUS TOTAL f GROSS PROFIT ' / w e TOTAL f OTHER EXPENSES: �� CONTINGENT LIABILITIES LIABILITY AS ENDORSER ON NOTES OF OTHER LIABILITY AS GUARANTY OR SURETY FOR DEBTS OF OTHERS LIABILITY FOR JUDGMENTS OR SUITS PENDINI ALL OTHER CONTINGENT LIABILITIES: (IT914129 TOTAL CONTINGENT LIABILITIES STATEMENT OF PROFIT AND LOSS FOR THE PERIOD BEGINNING AND ENDING., NET SALES OPERATING PROFIT COST OF GOODS SOLD: OTHER INCOME: TOTAL INVENTORIES 13E- GINNING OF PERIOD INVESTA1ENTi ADD: PURCHASES DURING PERIOD CASH DISCOUNTS RECEIVED TOTAL OTHER DEDUCT: TOTAL INVENTOR'"" AT CLOSE Or PEItlop TOTAL GROSS PROFIT OTHER EXPENSES: ADMINISTRATIVE. GENERAL AND SELLING EXPENSESs INTEREST PROPIR1ETOR'5 SALARY CASH DISCOUNTS GIVEN DEPRECIATION BAD DEBTS SELLING EXPENSES OTHER OTHER TOTAL NET PROFIT OR LOSS TO TOTAL NET WORTH OR SURPLUS A , iE TO BANKS . IiA OI Wow COLLATCRAL wNC;N OuE AMOUNT TOTAL DUE TO !TANKS � i / a/ DUE TO OTHERS (ITEMIZE EVER DEBT OVER $100) NAM[ 01 CREDITOR onto IN or O[ST r1IH[N OVE A940tJNT f ALL OTHER DEBTS NOT SHOWN ABOVE TOTAL DUE TO OTHERS i REAL ESTATE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION YEAR PURCNASCO COST Ats[SS[O VALUE /IAE INSURANCE PRt1[NT VALUE wowTawvt YEARLY Gwo RENTAL INCOM& AMOUNT WHEN Due z I • I- :v t eS ODD THE , EG AND EQUITABLE TIT TO ALL THE REAL "STATE LISTED ABOVE IS SOLELY IN MY NAME. EXCEPT AS FOLLOWS: �O v •rS Q � t r. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY FACE AMOUNT OF POLICY TOTAL CASH suRRENOtR VALUE TOTAL LOANS AGAINST POLICY BENEFICIARY TO WHOM POLICY Is ASSIGNEa OTHER INSURANCE 'IF T141S STATEMENT COVERS THE BUSINESS OF A PARTNERSHIP LIST BELOW THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTNERS. IN SUBMITTING THE FOREGOING STATEMENT THE UNDERSIGNED GUARANTEES ITS ACCURACY WITH THE INTENT THAT IT BE RELIED UPON BY THE AFORESAID BANK IN EXTENDING CREDIT TO THE UNDERSIGNED AND WARRANTS THA T,,., HAS-NOT KNOWINGLY WITH- HELD ANY INFORMATION THAT MIGHT AFFECT�CREDIT RISK; AND THE UNDERSIGNED EXPRESSLY AGREES TO NOTIFY IMMEDIATELY SAID BANK IN WRITING OF ANY MATERIAL CHANGE IN FINANCIAL CONDITION WHETHER APPLICATION FOR FURTHER CREDIT IS MADE OR NOT AND IN THE ABSENCE OF SUCH WRITTEN NOTICE IT IS EXPRESSLY AGREED THAT SAID BANK IN GRANTING NEW OR CONTINUING CREDIT MAY RELY ON THIS STATEMENT AS HAVING THE SAME FORCE AND EFFECT AS IF DELIVERED UPON THE DATE ADDITIONAL CREDIT 15 REQUESTED OR EXISTING CREDIT EXTENDED OR CONTINUED. SIGNED AT '� SIGNATURE ez, THIS DAY OF u � E ' /o MEMORANDUM To: City Manager From: Associate Planner -- Johnson Subject: Zone Change (R -1 to R -2) Location: McKnight Road, south of Holloway Avenue Applicant /Owner: Richard Schreier t Date : June -21, 1984 SUMMARY P7 AWN. Action by 11, o a i f -1. I Re�ectc,- Date Request A zone change from R -1, single dwelling to R -2, double dwelling to construct a double dwelling. �r�mmnr�- n A double dwelling at this location would be consistent with the intent of the land use plan. The site is on the periphery of a single - dwelling neighborhood, bounded by a future park and McKnight Road - -a major arterial roadway. The structure would be compatible with the nearby single - dwelling properties. The property owner abutting to the south (1860 McKnight Road) signed the applicant's petition (page 7) in favor of the proposal. There will be at least fifty feet to the dwelling abutting to the north, even if Tierney Avenue were to be vacated in the future. McKnight Road provides adequate separation from the larger lot, single dwellings to the west. Site and building plans must be approved by the Community Design Review Board.. Recommendation Approve the enclosed resolution (page 8), rezoning the property at the southeast corner of McKnight Road and Tierney Avenue from R--1, single dwelling to R -2, double dwelling. BACKGROUND Si k- Description Area: 20,252 square feet with 101.26 feet of frontage on McKnight Road Existing land use: undeveloped Surrounding Land Uses North: Undeveloped 66 -foot wide Tierney Avenue right -of -way. Across the right-of-way is a single dwelling. -East: Undeveloped Hillside Park, owned by the city. :South: Single dwelling West: McKnight Road. Across the road are single dwellings . Actions 3-4 -82: Council tabled consideration of the vacation of Tierney Avenue from McKnight Road to Myrtle Street until a plan is completed for Hillside Park. Development of this plan has not been scheduled. 4 -9 -84: Council approved a zone change from R--1 to R -2 for James Youngren at 1037 North Century Avenue. The site is planned for RL, residential lower density use and on the periphery of a single- dwelling neighborhood. Planning 11 Land use plan designation: R.L. residential lower density _2, Zoning: Present- --R -1, single dwelling; Proposed- -R--2, double dwelling 3. Policy criteria from the plan: Page 18 -29- -The RL land use plan designation is primary designed for a variety of single dwellings. An .occasional double dwelling may be allowed. .., Density: This neighborhood has developed substantially below the permitted density. It would continue to be substantially below the permitted density if this double dwelling were to be permitted. - 2 - .Public Works Water and sanitary sewer are ,,available. vrnr , 4zallrP 1. Planning commission recommendation !2. City council decision 'following a public hearing. mb Attachments: 1. Location map .2. Property line map 3. Hillside neighborhood land use plan -4. Petition 5. Resolution t 'jam f - 3 - 51 f+'. 1 ' D.1 • { ' 7E Cr W W C 25) 2160 N. p u1APt.EW�OD :' (1) STANICH CT. PUBLIC WORKS Jr sue• / NORTH ST. PAUL 29 -- H LOW AY AVE. c LL.; 5 Q ~ C -* 21� o AA 5 Z 0 7 R I EY AV x �� �,. J KIN AVE. V U J PRICE =AVE oc z t Q W ; >. N O Z � _ o� 3 0 Z LA RPENTE VE AVE, 0 F- IF 10AH0 AVE. W Z i W = _ L L T29NRttW J — 14 113 0 Q Q 23124 r = 01 c �• MONTANA AVE. Er C cr v!Cj • w 1440 N. Y M A RYIAKE RD. . G. W Ivy MVE . Q 0 Q Trailer Court C� 68 (Private) 212 _ 1200 E MA RYLA N D 1 do LOCATION MAP I Attachment 1 4 N aw pool TT i 1 L - ' ' ` -74 17 Z 40r, PC MM jig ra- fi is m M _ r 4. i l '� I at A la I 1898 r ' I _ l 189 1 - 1881 •. ~" - I I I ' 1886 1879 T I E R N E Y .. .......... ............ 1865 - - t 1869 _ 4 _ ' 1 ti 1854 - 1847 1844 r r, ` C r C• %X v ^ s , Q . , .- n r GCS C '" +•. t •. .. _ . , •.'s: r 1' 7 1 i i F 1 I I t � PROPERTY L / ZONING MAP 5 Attachment 2 rN Li .�` '.1itDC40to l t IFMMM � 1 .. �l :.lira+ au r Ho1low.ay y-- ,NK��:...,,,,�rr�a or collector Ott w : OS RI - r•-- -- A.. r- -= 9-ft I s a R a� �.. -R h � 1 1 O c M - major arterial C Larpenteur► I , 1 U 1 ' L, ' t I ' f ( R m - 1 con Bw o R -- m CL3 L3 I , � S Excerpt from Hillside Neighborhood Land Use Plan - 6 - Attachment Three r C I. 1- I I I: EXHIBIT D FEE OWN ERS WITHIN 2 00 FEET PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER FEE OWENR AND PROPERTY ADDRESS AND ADDRESS 57 33200 - 020 _ George C. Audette, et at. t 1860 McKnight, Road North� -` 1860 McKnight Road North •• � L� Ls,�,Lt� -t�- St. Paul, MN 55109 57- 33200 - 030 -02.r� _ ,,�__.� Virgil C. S Sharon J. Johnson 1854 McKnight Road North ►, - �, 1854 McKnight RDad North �- _ - X .C� • .D.. „�'.r�n=., _ . St. Paul, ?4. 55109 57- 33200 - 040-02 Frances L. Aaugstad 1848 McKnight Road F. Grant 1848 McKnight Road North St. Paul, M 55109 i 57- 33200 - 170-02 City of Maplewood Unassigned 1380 cost Avenue St. P I MN 55109 57- 33200 - 180-02 City o x Maplewood Unassigned 1380 Fr t Avenue • St. Paul MN 55109 57- 33200 - 190-02 City of lewood Unassigned 1380 Frost Avenue St. Paul, 55109 57- 33200 - 200-02 City of Maplewood Tierney Avenue 1380 Frost Avenue St. Paul, MN 55109 57- 75900- 180-00 James R. & Phyllis C. Redden 1892 McKnight Road North 1892 McKnight Road North St. Paul. MN 55109 57- 75900 - 190 -00 Maurice D. & Shirley C. Crawley 1886 McKnight Road North - 1886 McKnight Road North St. Paul, MN 55109 57- 75900 - 200 -00 City of Maplewood Tierney Avenue 1380 Frost Avenue St. Padl, MN 55109 57- 75900 - 210-00 City of M aplewood Tierney Avenue 1380 Fros Avenue St. Paul, ' 55109 57- 75900 - 220-00 City of Map ewood Tierney Avenue 1380 Frost A enue St. Paul. MN 55109 57- 32800- 041 -02 George Hollen 1755 McKnight Road North 1755 McKnight Road North - -- St:. Paul, MN 55109 Cecil L. Anderson, et , el. 57-32800-050-02 2243 Larpenteur Avenue East 2243 East Larpenteur Avenue St. Paul, MN 55109 57- 32800 - 060- 02 - �.Z =� ��✓ Edward F. Halpez, et el. 1714 Howard Avenue North %1714 North 'Howard Street ' L St. Paul, MN 55109 -7 Af IZ- 7- Attachment Four Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of at .7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Richard Schreier initiated a rezoning from R -1, single dwelling to R -2, double dwelling for the following - described property: Lot 1, Block 2, Hillside Homesites WHEREAS, the procedural history this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by Richard Schreier, pursuant to chapter 36 article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on July 2, 1984, The Planning Commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be . 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public. hearing on .,.1984 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed P ursuant to law. All persons present ,at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above -- described rezonin g be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose a intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract -f :rom the use of neighboring property or from the character of the - nei 9 hborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area ,included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the IN logical, efficient, and economical extension of public serves and -facilities such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection ,_and schools. .Adopted this day of 1984. .Seconded by g - Attachment Five STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) -- SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of . mii7utes of a 4egular meeting of the original on' file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 198 . City - Clerk City of Maplewood. f suls 4-- 1 Ac t - by MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: Stop Signs, Ripley and Atlantic .DATE: Jul 3, 1984 ,-I C . End o, er] Modifi Reject c d.._..�____�_ ._... Dat .�,..._ At the June 25, 1984 council meeting several residents spoke in opposition to the newly installed stop signs on Ripley at Atlantic. The city council will address the issue at the July 9, 1984 meeting. MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: City Engineer • SUBJECT: Stop Sign Request -- Ripley & Atl anti c DATE: June 4, 1984 Action by C.- Endorse Modifie �__ Rejecte Date Attached is a request from a number of residents in the neighbor- hood surrounding the intersection of Ripley and Atlantic. Presently Atlantic traffic is stopped at Ripley. The request is to also stop Ri 1 e � at the intersection. The concern is for the safety of P y children on bicycles due to poor sight ht distance and excessive vehicle speeds on Ripley. The city P it has ad the State Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Device s as p art- of the City Code (Sec. 18 -2) . The manual is explicit . in what warrants mu.l tiway stop signs. This intersection does not meet any of the criteria. It is recommended the City Council take no action on this matter. jW Attachment Ay IH,!`1Cti S we the residents at & near the cross streets of Ripley & Atlan± is in Neap e��ooa e in traffic control at the inter would like to see a cha nge prementloned . Currently there are stop o signs for traffic on Atlantic; but the cross street t g Ripley is a through street. The children riding their bicycles through this area is our main concern. Vision is hampered both to drivers & children on their bicycles due to large pine trees on the south side of this intersection & bushes on the north side. It has been a long time problem - -- drivers well exceeding the speed limit on s i ns on Ri ley making this intersection a 4-way Ripley. If there were stop g P P intersection &the risk of a child getting hurt ore v stop we would reduce the number of constant speeders • n killed . We do realize this s not a heavy e i due to the hampered vision & the number o�' small children, traffic area but P o we do feel that a 4 -way stop sign is greatly needed t protect the ch ild red from the drivers that do not wish to obey the 30 mile an hour zone. 12 i c) x4 -F 4-7 � r 4 1 NAI ! I � - � r •-s• R1 -1 RI-3 RI-4 30" x 30" 12" x 6 8' 1 6., 2B -4 Stop Sign (R1 -1). STOP signs are intended for use where traffic is required to stop. The STOP sign shall be an octagon with white message and border on a red background. The standard size shall be 30 x 30 inches. Where greater emphasis or visibility is required, a larger size i s recommended. On lo« volume local streets and secondary roads with love• approach speeds, a 24 x 24 inch size may be used. At a multiwaV stop intersection (sec. 2B -6), a supplementary plate (R1 -3) should be mounted just below each STOP sign. If the number of approach legs to the intersection is three or more, the numeral on the supplementary plate shall correspond to the actual number of legs, or the legend ALL -NVAY (R1 -4) may be used. The supplementary plate shall have white letters on a red background and shall have a standard size of 12 x 6-inches (R1 -3) or 18 x 6 inches (R1 -4). A STOP sign beacon or beacons may be used in conjunction with a STOP sign as described in section 4E-4. Secondary messages shall not be used on STOP sign faces. 213 Warrants for Stop Sign Because the STOP sign causes a substantial inconvenience to motor- ists, it should be used only where warranted. A STOP sign may be warranted at an intersection where one or more of the following condi- tions exist: 1. Intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right -of - way rule is unduly hazardous. 2. Street entering a through highway or street. 3. UnsignaIized intersection in a signalized area. 4. Other intersections where a combination of high speed, restricted view and serious accident record indicates a need for control by the STOP sign. STOP signs should never be used on the through roadways ex- P ressways. Properly designed expressway interchanges provide for the ZB -Z 5 continuous flov%• of traffic, making STOP signs unnecessary even on the entering roadways. Where at- grade intersections are temporarily justi- fied for local traffic in sparsely populated areas, STOP signs should be used on the entering roadways to protect the through traffic. STOP signs may also be required at the end of diverging roadways at the intersection with other highv%•ays not designed as expressways. In most of these cases, the speeds will not warrant any great increase in the sign sizes. STOP signs shall not be erected at intersections where traffic control signals are operating. The conflicting commands of two types of control devices are confusing. If traffic is required to stop when the operation of the stop- and -go signals is not warranted, the signals should be put on flashing operation m the red flashing light facing the traffic that must stop. '"'here two main highways intersect, the STOP sign or signs should normally be posted on the minor street to stop the lesser flow-of traffic. Traffic engineering studies, however, may justify a decision to install a STOP sign or signs on the major street, as at a three -way intersection where safety considerations may justify stopping the greater flovN• of traffic to permit a left - turning movement. STOP signs should not be installed indiscriminate]`• at all unprotected crossings. The allowance of STOP signs at all such crossings would eventually breed contempt for both law enforcement, and obedience to the sign's command to stop. STOP signs may only be used at selected rail/highway grade crossings after their need has been determined by a detailed traffic engineering study. Such studies should consider ap- proach speeds, sight distance restrictions, volumes, accident records, etc. This application of STOP signs should be an interim use period during which plans for lights, gates or other means of control are being prepared. Portable or part -time STOP signs shall not be used except for emer- gency purposes. Also, STOP signs should not be used for speed control. 28 -6 M ultiway Stop Signs The "Multiway Stop installation is useful as a safety measure at some locations. It should ordinarily be used only where the volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approximately equal. A traffic con- - trol signal is more satisfactory for an intersection with a heavy volume of traffic. Any of the following conditions may warrant a multiway STOP sign installation (sec. 2B-4): 1. Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multiway stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly- to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the signal iTrstal- lation. 2B -3 2. An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported acci- dents of a type susceptible of correction by a multivk•ay stop installation in a 12 -month P eriod. Such accidents include right- and left -turn colli- sions as well as right -angle collisions. • 3. Minimum traffic volumes: (a) The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average at least '00 � per hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and (b) The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the mi- nor street or highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle dur- ing the maximum hour, but (c) When the 85- percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70 percent of the above requirements. ?B-7 Yield Sign . (R1 - 2) The YIELD sign assigns right- of- vN•aY to traffic on certain approaches to an intersection. Vehicles controlled b` a "�' I E LD sign need stop onlN• when necessary to avoid interference with other traffic that Is given the right-of-way. The YIELD sign shall b e a do\1, 'k•ard pointing, equilateral triangle havin g a red border band and a \vhite interior and the \vord YIELD in red inside the border band. The standard size shall be 36 x 36 x 36 inches. \. �. Jw YIELD -' RI-2 36" x 36' x 3 6 01 2B -8 M'arrants for Y ieid Signs The YIELD sign may be warranted: 1. On a minor road at the entrance to ap intersection where it is V ne cessar y � to ass right -of - way to the major road, but where a stop is n ecessary at all times, and where the. notn ry safe approach speed on the __ minor road exceeds 10 miles per hour. ZB -4 0 GPM ZW 4 MEMORANDUM Action by Cr, :�r_� Endorse _ TO: City Man er Modif 1 e -- FROM: Environmental Health Official Re J ecte SUBJECT: Leaf Composting Site Date f The following information has been compiled regarding a possible leaf composting site in Maplewood. The city council requested this information at their May 9th meeting. Numerous possible sites were looked private land. The criteria used in was proximity to r e s i d e n t i a l homes, to prevent illegal dumping (gate or be needed. Only two sites came clo site on Beam and Highway 61 and the yard on Highway 36. The tower site at on vacant unused city, county, state and the consideration or rejection of a site access roads, drainage of the site, control fence) and the amount of site work that would se to meeting this criteria: the KSTR tower tax - forfeit property behind the MnDOT storage was chosen as the better of the two. The KSTP tower site is located at the end of Fitch Road (see maps) and is owned by Hubbard Broadcasting Company. The area was formally used as a sod farm, but is now unused. The site has access from Fitch Road or Beam Avenue. The Beam Avenue access would be preferable because it would not create an increase in traffic in a residential neighborhood. Hubbard Broadcasting has expressed an interest in the project and given tentative approval. If the site were selected, ,a formal contract would have to be signed with them. Ramsey County, which has for the past year hoped to locate a composting site somewhere in our area, has budgeted money for this project. They have $2,000 allotted for the si development and an access road, $175 for a gate, $225 for site informational signs and advertisement and $336 for a site monitor. They w i l l provide l i a b i l i t y insurance coverage for the site. The site would be open three weeks in the spring and four weeks in the fall. The dollar 'amounts that the y 9 PP have budgeted would appear to be adequate at this time, but as this is a joint project, the city would be expected to contribute some financial support should there be unexpected costs. It would be the responsibility of - the city to hire a s i t e monitor, the salary to be p a i d from county funds, and to turn and water the leaves during composting. The city would also be responsible for monitoring the site entrance and removing any bags of leaves dumped there. One condition that the county imposes with their financial support is that the site be open to all county residents. Recommendation Approve a leaf composting site on the KSTP site and authorize the manager to enter into the appropriate contracts. Attachments: 1. Location map 2. Property line/zoning map 3. County compost sites • _=-- .. c _- �a VADNAIS HEIGHTS o Q °o W * - ..-� t-- ..•.�. E A M •__ i V E / t Lake t 4, 23 II x mi m I c n UWl" cn PAL m CT. C CONNDR CR - CT. a r 22 W 0 U- o_ ~ KOHL.1 DGE FILL R0• t _ I DEMONT AV �_.. V t c R AVE : _ o 4 o " A i SEX CERVA1: AVE. A AM VIEM' COURT 36 I _ Olt. SHERREK AV s �" PE AV E . o LARK AVE. LARK WE � � LARK AVE. i 5 � _ ♦' 1--- ,--..J L ALMt iE MD. _ k w*lf L 25 �up2 A Y Ar o Jul 'TI N AVE . ~ + > A Yz . RKE AV _ RU K -- - LOCATION MAP 1 It 'd.; IL olo Lem 'a man ��a mmunume�t� man 45 Oil 2 74 T 274 1 1 1 2V3j � I , wwJJ p • , S j ( � 1 El 7 3 r;2i ., M j C3 I J ;� i ' L1; El _ Q, M _. �M M 01 ' �• -I `� {O' • � t� � M d I •t i A VI 6 4 I � r I ' I � � • � . I r 1• •.� . T 1 I r•r r, j - `r . iT { r - r •i faatq :.. <� r� t ' ., . - :�■ - 84 5 ut� J• 2823 p ., 19 2 813 E3 L It ■ 2809 CI Q r es ' z�81 D� s r Z C7' 2767 p' fill %,K59. p • , `` rm 2 747 L► Q e � rJ , 27 31 ` V 3 ' � � 1 _ 2727 2713 El ! 1 2707 Eli � i r I I .Q I t re - - C O U N T Y - --- - R 4 A C�- • 1 1, c PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP UN �asev itl� r L2Atrd?Jf 2 �alrsn F1e�1y.�— bi cz.:v Maple Wro� �L 4(.w 4 0 3 fit. fawn 1� Ncr+k St, pav) LOA T � [pH�sJS�TES -4 �a�nds View tv�$Tj N�r� O�cs evi Nulls 4i L.aYe �asev itl� r L2Atrd?Jf 2 �alrsn F1e�1y.�— bi cz.:v Maple Wro� �L 4(.w 4 0 3 fit. fawn 1� Ncr+k St, pav) LOA T � [pH�sJS�TES KEY 1 Planning District 1: Access to the site is located at the south end of Wjnthrop Street just off Londin Lane, between ' t Hi 9 hwood School' /Recreation Center and Afton View Apartments. _- 2 Planning District 5: Access to the site is located at the intersection of Frank Street and Sims Avenue. 3 Planning District 16: Just west of the Pleasant Ice Arena on Pleasant Avenue. 4 Planning District 11: Access to the site is located on the north side of Pierce- Butler Route between Fairview and Prior Avenues. 5 Arden Hills /New Brighton: Access to the site is located at the end of Hudson Avenue just east of the intersection of Hudson Avenue and New Brighton Road. 6 Mounds. -Vi ew: Located In Ardan Park at the corner of Ardan Avenue and-Long Lake Road. I I I K' "I /1 v (%'} I - TO . -'ROM : K GAiRDING : DATE: 14 +� ('' �as A ction b7 C .1 :. M d 1 Er CITY MANAGER 1 ==„ 'y -� - t e - - C I TY C LEPY; T, � T _ �' R LEARNING CEI� INDU STRI CAL DEVELOPI TNT RE�,�Er�UE NO T 1 E KINDER CA- RE JUNE 5, 1954 Kinder Care Learning Centers, Inc. has made application for an Industrial De�Jei•�,�...__: , r- Revenue Note in the amount of $400,000 to acquire land and construct a 5,000 square fr R T o be located on teh north side of r child learning and dad' care facility. This is t .Roams D and west of V'v1ite Bear Avenue (approximately 100 feet of Midas Muffler). Attached is the application to the City and the application to the State ^' r t''-i' �; ari E^ o:�o: sic Deveiopr�ent Authority- explain -A- the specifics of the revue✓ . A representative of Kinder Care will be at the meeting to make a preser tat.vr . A. - D0424 -01 This APP. 1 i cat ion must be submitted in DUPLICATE ST ATE MINNESOT MIN NESOTA ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ' • Application Approval of Municipal ci al Industrial Revenue Bond Project . For Appro P . - = Ener and ECOnaml C Date • Minnesota gy Development Author 480 Cedar St., Rm. 100 Hanover Bldg. St. Paul Minnesota 55101 . unt of Ramsey , Mi nnesot i " � �� governing n bod of Ma ple w ood Co y rn , 9 y State ate of The g d Econo�ic Development Authority of the $#�ereb applies to the Minnesota Energy an Bond •ssue • y crmunit ' proposed Municipal Industrial-Revenue o d a -,Mi nnes o L or a pp r oval of this co y P P req uired b Miren. Stat. 5474.01, Subd. 7a. . R y t preliminary nar discussions with: .tee have entered into p y . Kinder -Care Learning Centers, Inc. F 4505 Executive Park Drive Address 3 6116 Alabama State of Incorporation Delaware C � ` Montgomery State . _ y Bri s and Morgan - Bond At 'Lorney gg . • 2200 First National'Bank Building Address Kinder - Care Learning Centers, Inc. f' ame of Pro e - • • primaril 1 in (nature of business): firm Development of child ihis en gaged t i is pr y 'learning and day care facilities • Bands will be used to (general d from the sale of the Industrial Revenue '3he funds receive and construct thereon a 5,000 s ft - child lure of proj Acquire na ture p ro land J learning and day care facility 't will be located i n Maplewood • - 4 0 0 000 to be applied toward payn4 d- issue wi ll be approximately fie total bond of costs now estimated as follows: i t i n reconstruction* improvement , Acq u i s o . bet ernent or extension of project Construction Costs , ui ment A and Installation Eq p .eC Fee Architectural, engineering, insp Fee n or ion fiscal legal, ad , t ministratio 9 . printing I nteres L. accrual during construction Initial bond reserve Conti ngencies Bond discount . Other 125,000 Zbo 00 r o • :�• APPLICATION /AGREEMENT FOR TAX EXEMPT a MORTGAGE REVENUE NOTE FINANCING This Ag reement is hereby entered into between he Ci t of Maplewood ewood , Minnesota, hereinafter called the City and e _7 hereinafter called the "appli The ap is requesting financing for a development project and desires that the Ci ty i ssue notes accordi to the terms of the M u n i c i p a l Industrial Development Act of 1967 as amended. In order for the application I P to be consi dered by the Ci ty , tine applicant hereby agrees to pay all costs involved in the legal and fiscal review of the proposed project and all costs involved in the issuance of said notes to finance the project. It is further agreed and understood that the City reserves the right to deny any application for financing in any stage of the proceedings prior to adopting the resolution authorizing the issuance of notes. 1. APPLICANT: a. Business Name - K1n der - CAAA 4^^�'�'� b. Business Address - qS05 P a " k c. Business Form (corporati n, Oartner� hip, sole proprietorship, etc.) - d. Authorized Represe tative e. Telephone - 332095.5 2. NAME (S) OF MAJORITY STOCKHOLDERS, OFFICERS &DIRECTORS, PARTNERS, PRINCIPALS: a. � Grass I f exv%-. C. `Tti.�s �s w kwAl d. e 3. INCLUDE A PROPERTY LINE M AP SH01�! I NG EXACT LOCATION OF PROPERTY* NAM' OF AD JACENT STREETS, AND DIMENSIONS OF PROPERTY. _ 4, NATURE of BUS1 r be the proj p : T hark Q � ar o , . 1 a. 6r�efly desc i p � P P • A A Gahc4 ft v4t a wN v � - &� Q v o 9 c- ) (IVER) t. b. PURPOSE OF REQUESTED FINANCING: ' a. Business purpose to be served. To r,�.�c� ���o�' b. Public purpose to be served. T I`'\40 L&e vi 1s.r o�' T. BUSINESS PRO FILE• � project associated with an existing Maplewood Business? �. Is the p J Yes No ✓ . If yes: Relocation_____ Expansio n Re h ab i i to ti on_____ RUNT of CITY FINANCING BEING REQUESTED: $ 0L#) , D,P O Number of employees in Maplewood: Fu11 Ti me Part Time ' p ct o ° Before this p j - After this project , b. Projected annual sales: $ a 00 C. Projected annual payr $ 8. Nk ES OF : a. F i nanci al consultant for the business: b. Legal counsel for the business: 1, C. Corporate counsel: P'�e'lsx.g C64+ .9.0 WHAT IS YOUR TARGET DATE FOR: A. Construction start: Tuhe- bo Construction completion: Nou 1 g y t Vk1% Name of Applicant Signature of Authorized Representative �t e ate 'f he following items must be submitted with this app lication to the Community Development Department: 0 ANSI 20 A resolution setting a hearing date 3. An application to the Commissioner of Securities for approval of Municipal Industrial Revenue Bond project �� Y. have any questions on Items 2 or 3. call the City Clerk. Lucille Aurelius. 710-45( 'f , RESOLUTION RECITING- A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MI N NESOTA t;?t�ICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DE\ 7,_,LGP,-`ENT ACT A.UTHORIZING THE SUBMJSSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT TO THE ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT WHEREAS, (a) Purpose The of Chapter 474, Minnesota • • dustrial atutes known as the Minnesota Municipal In • St , "Act ") as found and determined by th Development Act (the legs . ' slature is to promote the welfare of th e state b y the active attraction • and encouragement and development of_economl- tally sound industry and commerce to prevent so far as possible al lands and areas of the emergence of blighted and margin chronic unemployment; necessitating (b) Factors n g the active promotion and development of economically sound industry and commerce are • concentration of population in the metropolitan the increasing con • rising increase in the. a-�ount and cost of areas and the rapidly rise g he needs of the 9 overru rental services required to meet t i tion and the need for development of land use popula which wi pro q vide an adequate tax base to finance t' j e s e - to em to mewnt opportunities for such increased costs and acces s P population; City Council of the City of i.1aple•,aood (c) The y " received from Kinder -Care Learning Centers, (the "City") has laws of the State of Inc. a ration organized under the • P "Company") a p that the City assist in Delaware (the Comp Y ) P p Pro •ect hereinafter described, through the issuance financing a 7 of a Revenue Bond or Bonds or a Revenue Note. or Notes hereinafter referred to in this resolution as "Revenue Bonas pursuant to the Act; sires to facilitate the selec- {d) The city de the tax veld ment of the community, retain and improve tive de p vide the ran a of services and emplo%ment base and help to pro 9 d the Proj will opportunities required by-the population; an • achieving those objectives. The Project assist the City in g • ... - � valuation of the C, FA r; � ill he • 1p to �n cr e- s e e c ;.aintain a pcsitive relat�ol :whip b =����Cer rise the ima e and reputation of the community; deb and enhance 9 ( e) The company is currently engaged in the financed business of developing evelo in child learning and day care facilities. • b the Revenue Bonds is a child The Project to be f Y n the North side learning Y nin and day cane facility to be located o of County Roa D South of Highway 694, and West of White Bear Avenue (100 feet west of the Midas Muffler shop) in the City an c onsists of the ac quisition of land and the construction of q a 5,000 square fo of building and improvements thereon to be and will result in initially owned and operated by the Company, new the employment nt of additional persons to work within she facilities; f The City has been advised byrepresenta • n that conventional, commercial financing to pay tines of Company Pro is available only on a limited the capital cost of the the economic basis and at such high costs of borrowing that • • operating the Project would be significantly feasibility of open g with reduced, but Company has also advised this Council that w the aid of municipal �w•in ici al financing, and its resulting low borrowing cost, the Project is economically more feasible; � Pursuant to a resolution of the City ( g) o n th e C ouncil adopted on May 14, 1984, a public hearing • P e 11 1984, after .notice was p�bl fished, 0 Project was held on Jun � and materials made available for public inspec tion at the City d b Minnesota Statutes, Section 474-01, Hall, all as require y Subdivision 7b at which ch p ublic hearing all those appearing who so desired to speak were heard; (h) No public official of the City has either a • financial interest in the Project nor. will direct or indirect fin any public ubl is official either directly or indi benefit financially from the Project* - SOLVED b t the NO�,T, TriEREFORE, • BE IT RE by City Council of city of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Y Council hereby g ives preliminary approval to the 1. The Coun Y g th Project prop o al of Company that the City undertake j s P Minnesota Municipal. Industrial Development �-...t pursuant to the Minnesota Statutes): cons ist�.ng of the (Chanter 474, _ con struction of facilities �,�itY:ln the S i �. 0 I'I c Tl d r. ' ications suitable for the operations to Company go aescribed above to s specifications be initially owned and operated by the uant to a revenue agreement between the City Co:�,n�ny and puts provisions fo� u on such terms and conditions with and Company P revision from time to time as necessary, so as to produce - • . dent to ay, when due, the .principal Income and revenues sufficient P maximum aggregate interest on the Revenu ' e Bonds in the maxi gg ., of and n • 400 000 to be issued pursuant to the Act principal amount of $ equipping of the the ac to finance acquisition, construction and q ' agreement may also provide Project; and said agre Y for the entire ed to the purchaser of t of Company P interest any therein to be mortgaged P • e City hereby undertakes preliminarily the Revenue Bonds, and th Y ts Revenue Bonds in accordance with such terms and to issue i conditions; ' ' available to this Council information ava 2 on the basis of i • and the Council hereby finds, that the Pro ect It appears, • ' es real and personal, used or useful in constitutes properties, connection with one or more revenue producing ducin g enterprises la of en in any business within the meaning of Subdivis e Act; that the Project furthers the Section 474.02 of th • 4 ?4.01, Minnesota Statutes; that the purposes stated in Section A c t and willingriess Of a vailability of the financing under the A • a Y • such financing will be a substantial the C it y to furnish inducement to Company to undertake the Project, and that the ' if undertaken, will be to encourage the effect of the Project, an co rn-n erce, to development r:►��nt of economically sound industry of the emergence of blighted and assist in the prevention to marginal final unemployment, land, to help prevent chronic P ym ent, to help • improve the tax base and to provide the the City retain and P rang e of service and employment opportunit ies req uired by the • el p revent the movement of talented an population, to h elp P educated persons out of the state an d to areas within the State to promote may P where their services y not be as effectively used, use of land within the city and more intensive development and eventually to increase the tax base of the community; e Project is hereby given preliminary approval by a. 3 'Fh 1_, . City subject to the zrpl "o�'zl o= 1 the Project by ., - '= , er and Economic Dcc �-la�: ►�nnt huthority c... such Jto �.r. gy officer having authority to other state off g grant approval ( the. "Authority"), and subject to final approval by this Council, Comna ny, and purchaser urchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the ulti- mate details of , the financing of the Project; 4. In accordance with Subdivision 7a of Section 474.01 • the Mayor of the City is hereby authors. -zed Minnesota Statutes, Y and. directed to submit the proposal for the Project to the Authority requesting its approval, and other officers, q 9 g employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to • Authority with such preliminary information as it provide the A y . may require; 50 Compa n y g has agreed and it is hereby determined that incurred b the City in conDec Lion with the any and all costs in Y f inancing inancin of the Project whether or not the P ro j ect is carried • r or not a roved by the Authority will to completion and whether PP be paid by Company; an Professional 6. Briggs and Morgan, Association, acting as bond counsel, and First Corporate Services, in vestment bankers, • ' assist in the preparation and review of are authorized to relating to the Projects necessary documents re g to consult with the City Attorney, Company and the purchaser of the Revenue ties interest rates and other terms and Bonds as to the maturities, to the covenants and provisions of the Revenue Bonds and as •t such ' ns of the necessary documents and to submit other provisions i o documents to the Council for final approval; 7. Nothing in this resolution or in the documents pre- pared pursuant here l o shall authorize the expenditure of any • ect other than the revenues derived municipal funds on the P ro j it for this the Project ect or otherwise granted to the City from 3 lien purpose. The R evenue Bonds shall not constitute a charge, or a ui table, upon any property or funds or encumbrance, l egal q he Cit exce t the revenue and proceeds p led to the p ledged g of t y P �_ ayment thereof nor s h , lde r of the Revenue hall the City be subject to any l i a b i l i t y hereon. The o Bonds shall never have the 1 an exercise of the right to compe y taxing power of the City to din p rincip al on the Revenue Bonds or the pay the outstanding P P a interest thereon, or to enforce paym ent thereof against. any ......�. r • r•- r 97 •- �-. +..� ►• property of th e City* The Revenue Bonds shall recite in subs ance that the Revenue Bonas, including i.nterejt • - l from the revenue and proceeds pled -cd to - `he is .& so able solely The Revenue B shall not constitute a debt payment thereof constitutional or of the City within the meaning of any con i. statutory l imitation; 8. In anticipation ation of the approval by the Authority the • v ill or a portion of _ issuance of the Revenue nue Bonds to fnance a the Project will Pro ect, and in order that completion of ' the � y not be unduly delayed when approved, Company is hereby authorized to make such expenditures and advances toward payment of th at portion of the costs of the Project to be financed from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds as Ccm any con - , including the use of interim, short - k..errn s ide rs nec essay y financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds if and when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the City; of the Project 9. If construction � ect is not commenced within one year from the date of this resolution the preliminary approval ranted herein shall be withdrawn. PP 9 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this 11th day of June, 1984. • 14ayor Attest: City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMS EY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD the undersigned, being the duly qualified and I, g ' Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY acting Cle CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract • he original final thereof on file in my office, and of minutes with t 9 that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of tr, minutes of a • meetin g of the City Council of said City duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as suc'n ,, minutes relate to a resolution giving preliminary approval to a commercial facilities development project. y WITNESS m hand -and the seal of said City this day of la 84 . City Clerk (SEAL) . I ►1 FL4YC-fIup/ .� I I r I• •o o� rRO�osEV e N; t i N v E e c 4CE bLRiw • N MuCc' Ito 0 • s•�e1 4 catl f to {N •o". V • uts � I 140-0 c0 UNTY eoA0 V P o o 0 LAM SC t li i • fo' o W t 0 z IA W etc J TOTAL 5171- ME& 3 t � y1 aU1LVIWG AZEA 7 PAQC11:4 • VQIVEWhl .4 PLAIGQODUV MEN ie,oll;po$ Misc. �eEn ��1Zo� cs 7 — - Q . L11 E v a N r � � a H . 60M. MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: DATE: City Manager Director of.Community Development" Plan Amendment A C E o , r Date Maplewood West Boulevard, Beam Avenue to County Road D City of Maplewood May 29, 1984 SUMMARY , R,eq u-est The cit y council, in December of 1983, initiated an amendment to the city's Comprehensive Plan, to designate Maplewood West Boulevard between Beam Avenue and County Road D, as a through street. Comments When this area, including the mall, is developed, it will generate more traffic than any other area in Maplewood. The city.must give careful thought to a street system that provides the best traffic circulation and best serves the needs of all property owners. The main disagreement at this time is between Mr. Korstad and Mr. Ha j i cek as to whether Maplewood West Boulevard should be a through street to County Road D. There have been four P rofessional traffic studies done in this area, including the most recent done by Benshoof and Associates. Two have recommended a Maplewood West Boulevard (Kennard Street) connecting County Road D and Beam Avenue and two have not. The problem is that as times change, the basic assumptions that go into these reports change. Assumptions on future land uses and traffic movements are intelligent guesses at best. To make a commit— ment to a local road system at this time would be premature. Mr. Korstad and Mr. Ha j i cek should be encouraged to workout their differences. The city should request a study on a slip ramp from MnDOT and try to preserve right —of— way for this ramp until a decision is made on its need and f e a s i b i l i t y . Recommendati on Adopt general guidelines, based on keeping as many options open as possible, g rather than amending the plan, because: 1. The streets are basically local and do not need to be shown on the plan, 2. It would be premature to draw alignments on the land use plan map, when development plans have not yet been done. ` 3. Guidelines need to be adopted, however, to give to the developers in this area who are preparing plans. The general guidelines are as follows: 1. The following streets shou l d be considered in development plans for the area: a. Maplewood West Boulevard from at least Beam Avenue to the north property l i n e of Mr. s' Korstad' ro ert . Continuation of this street to County Road D P P Y may be allo y wed b the ci:ty provided that traffic from Mr. Ha j i cek' s property is reasonably 1 distributed over Hazelwood Avenue, Maplewood West Boulevard and a future Southlawn Drive. b. A Southlawn Drive from Beam Avenue to County Road D with a slip ramp from I g —694. The alignment may have to be realigned to the west to front on properties that t woul d benefit from the assessments Construction of a slip ramp is contingent on Federal and State approvals, as well as major land owners' being willing to finance the cost. C. An east—west street connecting Maplewood West Boulevard and Southlawn Drive. There should be access to this street from the Korstad and Hai i cek properties. 2. The c i t y Y shall actively seek to preserve the right —of —way for a slip ramp from 1-694 to a future Southlawn Drive, until a decision is made on the f e a s i b i l i t y of construction. t 2 BACKGROUND Planning i 1. Maplewood West Boulevard, is constructed 260 feet north of Beam Avenue. County Road D is closed at the railroad tracks. The only access to Mr. Hajicek' s property is from County Road D to the east and Hazelwood Avenue to the south. J 2. The Metropolitan Council recommends that collector streets be spaced one - f ourth . to one mile apart. 3. The Northeast Maplewood Street Improvement Study done by Howard. Needles, Tammen and Bergendoff in 1974, recommended that Kennard Street (Maplewood West Boulevard) be constructed between County Road C and D. (See page 7 .) 4. The Northeast Area Transportation study done by Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. in 1974 recommended the realigning of Hazelwood Avenue from Beam Avenue north- easterly (or the extension of Kennard Street as an alternate), crossing I -694. (See page 8.) This street is recommended as a collector in the study. The realignment at Hazelwood Avenue no longer seems practical with the development of St. John's Hospital. 5. The Maplewood Transportation Plan done by Barton - Aschman, Inc. in 1979 does not show a collector street at Maplewood West Boulevard, but it does state that "the intersections of collectors with the east -west arterials (Beam Avenue on both sides of T.H. 61 and County Road C to the east of T.H. 61) were assumed to be at least 0.25 m i l e from their intersections with T.H. 61, in order to pro- vide for adequate vehicle storage on the arterials" (page 40). 6. The Maplewood Transportation Plan also assumes "that no extension of Kennard Avenue across I -694 would be required,.since the anticipated peak hour traffic northbound and southbound would fall below the ranges to justify the construction of a bridge across I -694. Instead, it was expected that any northbound traffic could be handled on improved White Bear Avenue and improved T.H. 61 (page 43). 7. Hazelwood Avenue is planned to be signalized at Beam Avenue,but to remain a two or three lane road. 8. A plan from Hajicek in 1974 shows a continuation of Maplewood West Boulevard from Mr. Korstad's land to County Road D. (See page 9 .) Mr. Korstad's plans show a nursing home between the end of Maplewood West Boulevard and his north property line (see page 10). The city has not approved any plans and has informed Mr. Korstad that no decision has been made on the extension of Maplewood West Boulevard. 9. The Maplewood Drainage plan proposed a 21 acre -foot drainage pond on the easterly part of Mr. Korstad's and Hajicek' s proeprty (see 11 ). This pond would make it difficult to curve a Maplewood West Boulevard to the east. MnDOT See enclosed letter on page 15 3 D rnron i i r 1. Planning commission Molds a public hearing and makes a recommendation to the city council, Z. The city council makes a decision, subject to review by the Metropolitan Council .for metropolitan significance. jc Attachments: 1. Land use plan map 2. Property line /zoning map 3. N.E. Maplewood Feasibility Study 4. N.E. Area Transportation Study 5. Maplewood Center plan 6. Korstad plan 7. Drainage plan 8. Alternate 1 9. Alternate 2 10. Alternate 3 11. Alternate 4 12. Alternate 5 13. Capacity analysis chart 14. Letter: Health Resources t 15, Letter: Mn /DOT 16. Benshoof report (separate attachment) RH 'SC interchange rinci al arterial interchan -7 ` V a�-- - Teights nais 'J� — - major collector J 1 RB rx 7- 0 - ._ . _. —BW __ ■ o t Aza 1 LSG . I — =-FP R ` - Ad" R I W. IM R -low I ma collet - Rm ��� z oe OS 0S I all �-- :C 1 R�.� S IL t R A 1. smog=% SC . LS major a terc�qnl; winterchan interchCn C-,www- ma �rtei: interchange own= J . ....... -ioll Ze<r- -1 7­1 09 n Hazelwood - N EIGi�BvR!"Q "u LAND USE PLAN (Proposed). Attachment One 5 r � I I Ir M A Cis �0 t O I Ir r r I ■ . I t 1 I n Ar c,.•aao • M �t� VIKING 1 D EV ELOP ..� • R 3� R 3 R 3 ; � 3 �- � - ws �f .sr ..rt � w w it s • . T n ' - �CSa siiii�s�l��iisis• COUNTY "W !iiiiiji*� "010000 P D -0 was •srassa��*.rsa�as =a� ML KO.RSTAD ' Ej V B . C , • ,•, '_' R 1 • '• r ,� 1 % min J _ �'' COW- VT. r r� :HOL4DAY ,• f I ' V HAJICEK INN HAJ I CEK 'r � , .4 L J LOW. J f , MAW —�- -- -- - �� --- -=�; ssss.s�rsasassa�ssassia• - � - is t 0;i 81 �i�ii At 45 B S . � S � � S S `�.� •�� V SCHRE I ER .' - HOMART a _ T ' KORSTAD •- KORSTAD ��;,. •4 t ��, J �. ` W ' 0 11p K r - � t LR� 9v BC al 1 r : - HOSp•I TAL SITE - _ OVIES � -'r, _ - �• ATMA e MOLE ODIC • HOMART LIL .� - f� ar.■ ss s :i ■rt-sE �t# I�-- "i i s0- MAW 16 WON= iii S ys W W-W W "S ri!UVOI ONO i• 7:; AV E. sa sr �- ar saais ais 10416 .6 F4. able All bill- L 4r 1.11 .• --tt / . • . • I. TvE g r . M :R1 � �rsr■rs ■ ■w =s iwrr.E • 1 ' �. ' `�' Maw* • PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 6 Attachment Two 4 N .LEOENDs "S TAG ING 1 2 f .Z , 3 �r 4 ... _.......__._ 5 6 NORTHEAST MAPLEWOOD FEASIBILITY STUDY rtrrrrtti 7 Attachment Three 4 N AMID Z Air fi r :.. �. 6 0 ORKE rt rt 0 zr ro rt 0 N Not To Scal e �, . 4 CKC oil Ir OQD �* , ��, •t,t.. } , G , , ,. :•��. .fi ;� • � ., � ,,,► ' r •' : '�- t•�;.. •f� ,., �. » rte. � � f • c f! `•� �' �• ' � �� ��'� � i [ Al 1 � ♦ r f� 1 1 .' '�• �I. r� 1 RL � , � � '` f .'tf • . / nA ar NY' J . Ak Joe 41 X_ 19�1 • 1 a ' • .t ,.� � .y -� � •� .�1� . A � � � r � •� � , r k j d f r 'd Ila- will JS To" j i I I 'A -q� At q .. 4rp- • NXTIr 1wrp J%I - It . f1h. Is it source: Figure 18 " Northeast Area Transportati on' S tu d y Barton-Aschman As'so-ciates,, Inc.,, June 1975 WILLIAM 8 KORSTAD- TRAFFIC STUDY F ULTIMATE ROADWAY SYSTEMS FROM MAPLEWOOD WEST AREA NORTHEAST AREA TRANSPORTATION BENSHOOF AND ASSOCIATES S TRA"SPOPTAYK5N PLANNNO AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS A I fC 6 t�c� to iV • ir, v Z ex Z Lid Cr &J LA C p cz a �oCD CM ► ' CD W N KORSTAD PROPERTY ji HAJICEK SITE PLAN, 1984 I Attachment Five COUWTY ROAD D NURSING HOME -60 BEDS CONGREGATE CARE ELDERLY HOUSMKT -120 UNrrS Q AtMuo C_ / REM AL APARTMENTS 120 UNITS / NUR SwG HOME STAFF-501 / NURSING M064 QUFSTS - 1" J I CO C APAR uENTS60 R 0 URFACE RENA.L 129 i I FOUNTAIN i I QQ - r �,' �� MAPLEWOOD : ( �( MALL I , RETAIL - 130.000 SF /FL I o b 00 + � PARKING I t I RETAIL -650 / t i OFFICE -125 v i HOTEL- / / SUPERMK T -50 o ' , O VG J AL13 5 SPACES ' I -- - HOUSING -120 UNITS i ENT , I N f /7 —L BANK + v O (_ ° SEFtviCE : SUPERMARKET - 10,000 SF s i L i I �I c o Q o ,, SERVICE COURT a FIOSPTTAL�tdMPt ED AL OFFICE COMPL • HOTEL -140 ROOMS i J � l i b b b �J TES >�OTEL 1 L-.i [MTRAM I C:D 1 + MAPLEWOOD WEST Korstad Site Plan, 1984 0 100 200 • 1 /1 • re 0 %W71 0,4 1 Attachment six 10 4 C R OAD "D" ... ............................... ............. ............................... .. ......................................................................... ............................... f ..................,,, ... �........................ . . 1 I � t -� - 1 1 i` HAJICEK , l , I 1 , � I a MAPL EWOOD ,-►� _..J MALL hOSPITA KORSTAD AM AVE r i r2l) L i� th W III 'IN i Attachment Seven MAPLEWOOD DRAINAGE PLAN 11 ' �i► rririi Iwr� WNW" ON" � r.rorrMr �sr w.w• < *ww bo om 600 mw& . 61/1t I -694 C+ r+ m �I 4. w NO . • r � EVE. Ob low COUNTY RO "o" lA J W Wynn, Ft. 1 And 1A A , r. 0 oQ l �F iu 'A AV co v AFAM "No.. _.. X o r1a Few, cu XOMLMAN JIVE. _ • �1 c E • c 4J aj 4J Y N � N on-mommo ,,--- -- --• --,��, N > ►! 0 1000' W XGHLMAN A ' Approx. Sca 1 e WILLIAM B. KORSTAD TRAFFIC STUDY FIGURE 9 FOR , ROADWAY ALTERNATIVES M APLEW OOD WEST AREA 1 AND lA BENSHOOF AND ASSOCIATES TAANSPORIATION PLANNING AND ENGINEERMq C,ONSkXTANT$ I -694 O T C VE. -- M N COUNTY ROAD 0 J W , Wood 1 vnn ,� a, ` LY01 A Al ......�+ gunman& numn D> r+ m r + � Z KOHLMAN AVE. L; 4J a) 4J N y a, c • r v Q- 4-v ..... A � cc E . x k v AFAM go RA 010 Man /,-- -- --- — VE. -- M N COUNTY ROAD 0 J W , Wood 1 vnn ,� a, ` LY01 A Al ......�+ gunman& numn D> r+ m r + � Z KOHLMAN AVE. L; 4J a) 4J N y a, c • WILLIAM B. KORSTAD FIGURE 10 TRAFFIC STUDY FOR ROADWAY ALTERNATIVES MAPLEWOOD WEST AREA 2 AND 2A BENSHOOF AND ASSOCIATES . TRANSPOATAMN PLANNWO ANO ENG NEEAWG CONSULTANTS r v Q- 4-v L A � cc E . x k v AFAM go RA 010 Man /,-- -- --- — _. W ♦, •f� -c Ze o l000� • w XGHLMAN A ' Approx . Scale WILLIAM B. KORSTAD FIGURE 10 TRAFFIC STUDY FOR ROADWAY ALTERNATIVES MAPLEWOOD WEST AREA 2 AND 2A BENSHOOF AND ASSOCIATES . TRANSPOATAMN PLANNWO ANO ENG NEEAWG CONSULTANTS .� 3A 1494 ' N .cam C+ r+ • • i N V E. ...:........ COUNTY ROAD ~ D" X 3 KOHLMAN AVE. Woo 1 ynn ,' Fl LYOIA Ai 'WWI 9 X � BEAM w � { > •� MIX � � 10QQ � K4 LWAN A* A pp rox . Scale WILLIAM B. KORSTAD TRAFFIC STUDY FIGURE 11 FOR MAPL-E'WOQD WEST AREA ROADWAY ALTERNATIVES BENSNOOF AND ASSOCIATES 3 AND 3A TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND ENDINEFpg"G CONSLjLTANT9 c E C 4J aj 4J Ne L CD `^ ... . r .n J ,,... . � 1111 .t i NNW ' 1 .. M. 1 I494 r+ C+ J 1 4A 1 .. -•. �• ��•r� .. _ ... • . ' ' . • . 04.0.. • • ; • 1 . • . • • • • . • : , . , • • • . • . •yam •�.�.M.i ice/ how � � • , I � U COUN T Y ROAD 000 00 • • A . V E, A Do � cry 0 o N �- r- � .� N tt, . KOHL�AN AVE, '� c . E c 4J a 4J ,e ll cm N RADAT Wood x LX!ZA_ a. u AEA' r J1 " N > ;] A +�I.�t�N App rox Sc a 1 e W 0 1000' KO WILLIAM B. KORSTAD TRAFFIC STUDY F IGURE 12 FOR MAPLEWOOD WEST AREA ROADWAY ALTERNTA I YES BENSHOOF AND ASSOCIATES 4 AN 4A TRANSPORTATION PLANNWO ANO EF+OINEERINO CONSULTANTS ' • • , • • • • • 1 . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •� •• • • • • • • f • • • 0 • • • • • . • .: • • • : , • t i .. COUNTY Roao •0� . +a v o 2 0 V � R XoNL MAN AVE. _ R A AT Z7 W •r L, E Z 1 9 0 a 4J +' W Xo +iLWAK A v� cn App � s ALTERNATIVE 5A Attachment twelve 16 CAPACITY ANALYSIS FOR INTERSECTIONS ON BEAM AVENUE 1 A summary description of each level of service is as follows: • Level of service A describes a condition of free flow, with high speeds. Traffic density. is low, with speeds controlled by driver desires, speed limits and physical roadway conditions. Little or no delay is experienced, Level of service B is in the zone of stable flow, with operating speeds inning to be restricted somewhat by traffic conditions. Drivers sti 11 have reasonable freedom to select their speed and lane of operation. The lower l i m i t of this level of service has been associated with service volumes used in the design of rural highways, • Level of service C is still in the zone of stable flow, but speeds and maneuverabi i ty are more closely controlled by the higher volumes. Most of the drivers are restricted in their freedom to select their own speed , change lanes or pass. This level of service often is used for urban design prac- tice. • Level of service D approaches unstable flow, with tolerable operating speeds being maintained though considerably affected by changes in operating con- ditions. Fluctuations in volume and temporary restrictions to flow may cause substantial drops in operating speeds. Drivers have little freedom to maneuver, and comfort and convenience are low. • Level of service E cannot be described by speed alone, but represents opera- tions at even ower operating speeds than in level D. with volumes at or near the capacity of the highway. Flow is unstable, and there may be stoppages of momentary duration. • Level of service F describes. forced flow operation at low speeds, where volu- mes, are below capacity. •Speeds are reduced substantially and stoppages may occur for short or long periods of time because of the downstream congestion. - In the extreme, both speed and volume can drop to zero. 17 Attachment -Thirteen Volume -to Capacity Ratio During P.M. Peak Hour and Level of Service by Intersection Alternative Beam &Hazelwood Beam &Maplewood West Beam & Southlawn 1 1.19 (E) 1.26 (F) 0.87 (A) la 1.11 (D) 1.05 (D) 0.87 (A) 2a 100 (C) 0.85 (A) 1.12 (D) 3a 100 (C) 0.95 (C) 0.99 (C) 4a 0099 (C) 0.98 (C) 0.96 (C) 5a 0.98 (C' 1..20 (E) 1.20 (E) 1 A summary description of each level of service is as follows: • Level of service A describes a condition of free flow, with high speeds. Traffic density. is low, with speeds controlled by driver desires, speed limits and physical roadway conditions. Little or no delay is experienced, Level of service B is in the zone of stable flow, with operating speeds inning to be restricted somewhat by traffic conditions. Drivers sti 11 have reasonable freedom to select their speed and lane of operation. The lower l i m i t of this level of service has been associated with service volumes used in the design of rural highways, • Level of service C is still in the zone of stable flow, but speeds and maneuverabi i ty are more closely controlled by the higher volumes. Most of the drivers are restricted in their freedom to select their own speed , change lanes or pass. This level of service often is used for urban design prac- tice. • Level of service D approaches unstable flow, with tolerable operating speeds being maintained though considerably affected by changes in operating con- ditions. Fluctuations in volume and temporary restrictions to flow may cause substantial drops in operating speeds. Drivers have little freedom to maneuver, and comfort and convenience are low. • Level of service E cannot be described by speed alone, but represents opera- tions at even ower operating speeds than in level D. with volumes at or near the capacity of the highway. Flow is unstable, and there may be stoppages of momentary duration. • Level of service F describes. forced flow operation at low speeds, where volu- mes, are below capacity. •Speeds are reduced substantially and stoppages may occur for short or long periods of time because of the downstream congestion. - In the extreme, both speed and volume can drop to zero. 17 Attachment -Thirteen .. ` - St.John S H ���� ��s pi 0��n - ---- '0 Care AP ril 2, 1984 " M�plewood Cit� Planning Commi�sion 13B0 Frost Avenue M lewood, Minneso 55109 Re: Maplewood Wes� Street Improvemen s/City Plan Amendmen� Commissioners: Health �esource� Znc' wishes to register the following statemen� th re��rd �o roadway improvements in the Maplewood West area: He�lth Resou_ce� Inc. opposes �ny plan t�at �oes not zncIude t�e I-694 special plan that would res�It only in the extension of Map Iewood West � Bo�.levarc! from Beam A,enue to County Road D. HRI belzeve� zhat tne slip ramp is `more likely to be built if the Ci�v designete� Sou�h]awn es a collec�or street, air�nd� th� rit� PI�n accordingly and w�rk� agr�ssively + insure �on�truction' HRI stronqly supports � ame� ment designating Southlawn as the colle�tor ` street �r�vide� a public street connection from Ma�lewood Wes�'�oulevard to South Iawn i� provide� �o d f the medical campus HRl sa�isf� the �c�es� nee s o ^ b/ lieves best interests wiIl not be served by the northerlv exten�ion of naplewood West Boulevard to County Ro�d D, W� will pr�cia�e vour c�n�ideration of our request' Respec�+vl��' ��illian Knu n . Assistant Adm�nistrat�r St . J ch 403 Maria Avenue mSt. Paul, Minnesota 551O6 A Service mJ Health Resources, Inc. Attachment Fourteen (6l2�228-36OO ' 18 1 �1 OF TRa� j )f '� )c�1 "1 i Il('! 11 t > 1 j I��! !�} ►� )I "1 ��11t )I l Dislricl 9 3485 Hadley AV( - x11L1c' ;N()1"111. 1 2050 North St. 1'aLll, N ilmeso la - 0�I09 May 9, 1984 Mr. Geoff Olson Planning Director City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear. Geoff: Telephone 779 -1210 As you requested at our April 18 meeting, I am writing to outline the District's reaction to your I -694 /White Bear Avenue eastbound offramp modification proposal. These comments are based on the concept, drawn by us, of which you have a copy, that shows bringing the ramp off of eastbound I -694 just east of the Burlington Northern bridge, allowing a slip ramp off to County I'D" at proposed Southlawn Drive, and having the ramp exit onto White Bear Avenue as it does presently. We do have reservations regarding this proposal. From a design perspective the ramp is too long (3500 feet) , slip ramps are not common to the Interstate system, "signing" the various movements would be a problem, and slip ramp maintenance would be inefficient (costly). This unusual design may prove to be unsafe, and is not consistent with Mn /DoT and Federal Highway Administration policy to pro- vide uniform interchange configurations. From a capacity perspective the proposed ramp modification may not be needed. If the ramp termini intersections of I -694 and White Bear Avenue reach unaccept- able levels of service, there remain other, more standard and less costly, congestion remedies. From a planning perspective the proposed modification is not needed if its purpose is to correct local access and /or capacity deficiencies created by a lack of a suitable local street support system or by excessive access to adjacent land par- cels. Ameliorating local transportation problems via Interstate modifications is not thought to be appropriate. Finally, from a costs and priorities perspective, if the ramp modification was to be constructed, it is likely that the City would need to provide the necessary rights of way needed as well as the approximately three quarters of a million • dollar construction costs (a very rough estimate). If the City wishes to further pursue this proposal I suggest that you formally ask Mn /DoT (request of our District Engineer, Kermit'McRae) to participate in a joint study. Such a study would likely entail , design and other activities aimed at getting approvals from Mn /DOT and the Federal Highway Administration, and, possibly, from the Metropolitan Council. Attachment 15 An Equal OpportunitY t:mployrr ►^ ; Mr. Geoff Olson May 9, 1984 to Page two I would be happy to go over these reservations and procedures with you in more detail if you like. Please keep me informed of the status of your proposal. Sincerely, .. Jerr.y Skelton District Planning Coordinator 20 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PL.'�i� 1 i�17 COi�i►l SS I Ui� 1380 FROST AVENUE, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MONDAY, APRIL 2, 1984 7:30 P,M. I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Axdahl called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Commissioner Lester Axdahl Commissioner Richard Barrett Commi ssi oner Paul El 1 of son Commissioner Lorraine Fischer Commissioner Dorothy Hejny Commissioner Joseph Pellish Commissioner Warren Robens Commissioner Marvin Sigmundik Commissioner Ralph Sletten Commi ssi oenr David Whitcomb III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. March 19, 1984 Present (Chairman) Present Present Present Absent Present Present Present Present Present Correct: page 4, add item #5 "The proposed change is consistent with the comprehensive plan, specifically page 18 -29 which permits an occasional double dwelling in an RL, residential lower density area." Commissioner Whitcomb moved approval of the minutes of March 19, 1984 as corrected. Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, E l l of son, Fischer, Pel 1 i sh, Si gmundi k, Whitcomb. Abstained -- Commissioners Robens and Sletten IV., APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Whitcomb moved approval of the agenda as submitted. Commissioner Sl etten seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Ell of son, Fischer, Pel 1 i sh, Robens, Si gmundi k, Sletten, Whitcomb V. PUBLIC HEARING A. Plan Amendment -- Maplewood .West Boulevard Secretary Olson read the n of public hearing. The request is to amend the city's Comprehensive Plan, to designate Maplewood West Boulevard between Beam Avenue and County Road D, as a through street. Chai rr ►an A - Y,01'ah - i asked if there was anyone present who wished to coTr;en on the proposal. Hamilton Luther, pres i dent of Tousl ey Development Corporation, property is located between County Road D and Highway 694, asked if the slip ramp would be state highway roadway or city roadway. Director of Public Wdrks Haider s a i d the ramp would-more than likely MnDOT facility, although they may want financial partipation on the city's part. It would be part of the interstate system. The commission questioned why the slip ramp is suggested. Secretary Olson said one of the main reasons would to relieve some of the traffic from .White Bear Avenue and direct it onto Southl awn. Director Haider indicated that modifications would be done to the intersection of White Bear and County Road D this year and the configuration w i l l somewhat change along with installation of traffic s i gnaI s. Secretary Olson said that County Road D could be used as the slip ramp for 694. The Highway Department wished to have some indication of interest by the city and then study it and look at a number of alternatives. Ken Bouser, 1765 E. County Road D, said the slip ramp would affect his property. He lots property for the construction of the freeway and also for the widening of County Road D. He is opposed to the slip ramp as it would take too much of his property. William Korstad, 20 Red Fox Road,said the proposed H plan is not one of their alternatives. They have submitted a number of alternatives. They do not wish to have their name on something that they have not proposed. They are opposed to extension of Maplewood West Boulevard. They have hired a traffic engineer to propose roadway alignment routes. He presented an up —to —date plan to the commission for consideration. They had proposed to construct a nursing home in 1983, however the legislature froze all nursing home construction for three years. If they do intend to construct the nursing home it will be installed further to the west and in conjuction with the hospital property. They have proposed to construct apartment buildings (3) in this particular location. He gave background on his property and the adjacent property.. The slip ramp would cover part of his property and part of Ha j i cek property. They feel the main road is necessary to connect Southlawn into the freeway or a sl i p off the freeway to Beam Avenue. He feels that if Maplewood West is extended into Hajicek property and he has the'use of Beam Avenue and bridge he should be assessed as he was not assessed for the previous road improvements of Beam Avenue. They intend also to ,install private roads and after construction dedicate them to the city so they become public roadways. 2 1 4 -2 -84 Jim Bens hooF , traf f i c er►gi neeri ng consul ;,tints, pr`: osed to do a comprehensive traffic analysis and address the needs from a traffic access circulation standpoi ng for the .Korstad property. Also look at those needs for other properties in the area. He reviewed the staff report and various alternatives f or street alignment. They do not recommend Southlawn Drive and slip ramp as the best solution. He does question if alternative 5a w i l l meet the demands required. He reviewed each alternative street alignment and what results would be from that alternative. To highlight their recommendations, the concerns of having Maplewood West as a through collector, it would not be able to connect to the new s l i p ramp from 694. It is not possible to move it that far to the west as there would not be adequate leading distance on 694. Maplewood West would not provide any real opportunity of relieve to White Bear Avenue, which is at maximum capacity. They recommend that Southlawn Drive be designated on the Comprehensive Plan as a collector roadway. It would provide the direct connection with the exit ramp. The city should pursue with MnDot the opportunity to provide the new exit ramp. They would suggest the sketch shown in the Northeast Area Study. Terry Boland, Hamel, Green and Abramson, architects and engineers said that Jim Goulet, civil engineer is also with him. He wished to comment relative to the proposed development on the Korstad property that is reinforced by the Benshoof study. Al ternati ve 4a appears to balance the traffic access to Beam Avenue. He commented onthe street alignment and the benefits to abutting property. They took into Tr consideration existing development in the area and *also future develop- ment when planning roadway alignments. They planned the area so that like uses are grouped together, uses that should be separated are and consequently the roadway as they planned, zones the property, Jim Goulet, civil engineer with Hamel, Green and Abramson, said the pond is 21 acre feet of storage which is based on 100 year storm event. He did not 'think the storage pond would be a barrier to a roadway system. There would be no problem with construction of this pond, Mr. Korstad said they tried to make a comprehensive study. of the proposed roadway system so the city would have a copy of the study as it should have been done. If Maplewood West Boulevard is extended to County Road D he w i l l not construct the 6 -story office building because of the possible traffic situation that can occur at Beam and Maplewood West Boulevard.. He cannot take the chance of losing tenants. He probably would not build one of the three apartment buildings which are seven stories high. The traffic from a commercial area through the residential area may affect his tenants. If the property is going to be split up then they may just construct anything possible. They request the plan be amended to put in the slip ramp and Southlawn extension. He thought Southlawn would be a lot easier to finance. Gene Wilson, resident of White Bear Lake and has been working with. Bob Hajicek on the development of his property. He commented on the Beam Avenue assessments. There are also assessments being paid for the development of County Road D. There was nothing in the report that spoke to how the traffic would be affected when the Highway 61/694 interchange is completed. Also it is proposed to upgrade Berkley in White Bear Lake and this would relieve some of the traffic from White Bear Avenue. He also questioned if there would be a problem with the develop- 3 4 -2 -84 meet of the Ha j i cek property with the construction of Southl ay. Uri vF and the s l i p ramp. This would supply added traffic to his property. He indicated thei r architect, Eldon Morrison would be glad to answer questions regarding the proposed development.on the land. Mr. Morrison sai d he has been working with Mr. Ha j i cek for a short time on this proposal. They wish to work with the land and utilize the hills and valleys and ponds. They are proposing a commercial service area, commercial retail area, a housing area and an office area. They have prospects for the properties. There are no final plans-for the property. This property shou.l d not be blocked off from easy access to the south and would encourage the commission to make a good decision. He thought the location of the slip ramp should definitely be determined by the state before any final decisions are made on the local roadways. Bill Knutson, representing Health Resources, specifically St. John's Hospital, they oppose any plan that does not include the I -694 slip ramp, especially a plan that woul d result only in the extension of Maplewood West Boulevard.f rom Beam Avenue to County Road D. They believe the slip ramp is more likely to be constructed if the city designates Southlawn as a collector street and amends the city plan accordingly and works towards its construction. They support the plan amendment to designate Southlawn as a collector street provided a public street connection from Maplewood West Boulevard to Southlawn is provided to satisfy the access needs fo the medical campus. Their best interest w i l l not be served by the northerly extension of Maplewood West Boulevard to County Road D. Alver Jones, representing a resident of County Road D, questioned why an extension of Maplewood West Boulevard is not going to benefit Health Resources. This would be an alternative route which would be more accessible to the hospital site than an extension of Southlawn. Furthermore, construction of the slip ramp does not necessitate the construction of Southlawn. The residents of County Road D are waiting for the development to come to help pay for the assessments of the widening. This development will not come 'if there is no access to where the major development area would be, which is to the south. He thought there would be an extreme cost with the development of Southlawn to the Hajicek property and the County Road D property. Bob Johnson, center manager of Maplewood Mall, the owners are in favor of the Southlawn extension to County Road D with the slip entrance off 694. The commission questioned why St. Johns and the mall favor the Southlawn development and extension. Mr. Knutson indicated that when they considered development of their property and neighboring property, it was felt the extension would be benefitial. After reviewing the traffic studies their major concern was traffic congestion. He cited Fairview /Southdale situation which may be similar. They felt the extension of Southlawn would keep the traffic congestion away from Maplewood West Boulevard and Beam Avenue 4 4 -2 -84 Mr. Johnson s a i d that coming in from the west side, i wou i d eliminate some traffic from White Bear Avenue. This would also encourage people to park on the west side of the mall. Chairman Axdahl closed the public hearing portion of the meeting. The commission discussed with Director Haider road alignments that could be developed that may ease the traffic situation on White Bear Avenue. The commission getting information as to traffic counts with the development of the northerly parcels. Commissioner Whitcomb moved the Pl'annin g Commission recommend to the city council that they take no action on the plan amendment, but adopt the following guidelines for the development of local streets in the. area: A. The following streets should be considered in development pl an-s for the area: 1. Maplewood West Boulevard from at least Beam Avenue to the north property l i n e of Mr. Korstad' s property. Continuation of this street to County Road D may be allowed by the city, provided that traffic from Mr. Hajicek's property is reasonably distributed over Hazelwood Avenue, .Mapl ewood West Boulevard and a future Southl awn Drive. 2. A Southlawn Drive from Beam Avenue to County Road D with a slip ramp from I -694. The alignment may have to be realigned to the west to front on properties that would benefit from the assessments. _ 3. An east -west street connecting Maplewood West Boulevard and Southl awn Dri ve. There shoul d be access to thi s street from the Korstad and Ha j i cek properties. B. The city shall actively seek to preserve the right —of -way for a s l i p ramp from I -694 to a future Southl awn Drive, until a decision is made on the feasibility of construction Authorize staff to send a letter to the Minnesota Department of Transportation requesting a slip ramp from I -694 to proposed South 1 awn Drive. Staff should also be authorized to study means of preserving the right -of -way. Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Ell of son, Fischer, Pell i sh, Robens, Si gmundi k, Sl etten, Whitcomb VI, VISITOR PRESENTATIONS VII. COMMUNICATIONS VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. PUD Time Extension-- Hazel.Ridge Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting approval of the renewal of the conditional use permit for Hazel Ridge planned unit development. Staff is recommending approval of the request. 5 4 -2 -84 CONFERENCE REPORT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 9 5e. C o DATE June 5, 1984 '. ,,SUBJECT: 694 /Maplewood Transportation Issues Meeting DELEGATES .Kenneth Haider :Clyde Fisk "red Hoisington Paul Kirkwold Bob Johnson Jim Benshoof Bill Korstad Gary Jackson Stephen Korstad Robert Hajicek Gene Wilson C. Hamilton Luther Get ;f Olson Don Olson Eldon Morrison Kermit McRae Jerry Skeltonro REPRESENTING Maplewood 770 - 4550 Grant Realtors 439 - 45b5 Health Resources 941 - 8044 Ramsey County Public Works 484 -9104 Maplewood Mall CPI 770 - 3862 BeDshoof & Assoc. 944 - 7590 Landowner 332 -1200 Maplewood Mall CPI 770 -3862 Landowner 332 -1200 Self 777 -4917 Ha jicek /Goins 439-4565 Tousley Development Corp. 246 -0983 Maplewood 770 - 4550 Holiday Inn 427 -3400 Hajicek /Goins - Eldon 426 -3287 Morrison Architects Mn /DOT - District _EnZinee X79 -1178 Mn/DOT - District Planning 779 -121 Coordinator Olson - most important to determine Mn /DOT's position on possible 694 /White Bear Ave. ramp modifications so that the City Council can act on developer's permit to construct .between "D" and 694 :Skelton - outlined design development of the proposed ramp modifications. concept and the problems it presented to Mn /DOT. Benshoof - presented design alternatives to the ramp modifications. -McRae - did not want to mislead developers into thinking that Mn /DOT would accept the ramp modifications; Mn /DOT had provided sufficient access points at White Bear _ Ave. and at 61, and that alternatives should be pursued for addressing local - transportation problems. Korstad - ramp modifications being proposed have a long history - before and apart of NEATF study; White Bear Ave. will be congested in a few years. .Skelton - offered alternatives to. open up access to the area without depending on additional access from 694 . r 694 /Maplewood Conference Report June 5, 1984 Page two Korstad suggested that the Benshoof study be furthered; liked the two separate exit ramps concept the best. Olson -asked .- for clarification of . what -- Mn /DDZ would -- accept_.. for__. furth study . McRae - indicated that none of the 694 /White Bear Ave. ramp modifications proposals r should be considered further in addressing the access needs; from a state sh perspective having traffic problems on White B ear Ave. is better than having them on the Interstate . Skelton - suggested that with this issue settled do the developers and City wish to study alternatives? e need to continue, nd a study without the Haider &Olson saw a � , � but City unlikely to f d making - developers contributing to the study g more of a develop ment commitment. Wilson better traffic flow is not a big benefit to developers; we are premature in guessing P in at traffic impacts; ; should concentrate on balancing traffic volumes � on and off of Beare Ave. Olson - City was most interested in a study only if 694 ramp modifications were con - � sidered. would still like to see more commitment by major developers. Harder - City . Wilson develop be ats development - snowballing effect; difficult to commit to -_ develop g very far in advance. Korstad - has already paid for a study - Benshoof's . Hoisington - traffic congestion does matter to his clients; suggested that there is a g need for further study, including possibly limiting development; would contribute $ to a small study. his architects are to be meeting with Hajicek's architects to work out local Korstad circulation and access plans. • need for all to meet to represent all needs and interests in developing Consensus. a . improvements; ; will meet again at : 30 on Friday, local transportation P June 8 @ Mn /DOT upstairs conference room. (' cc: 4 ,4.A G Olson - Maplewood K. McRae R. Elasky M. Robinson 0. Skelton 1 + VW. S. SUMMARY Request Approval of a preliminary plat that would replat part of the Viking Development Addition into five lots. (See page 7 .) Proposed Development Lot 1: car wash (approved by the community design review board) Lot 2: Kinder Care Day Care Center (tabled by the community design review board.) r Lot 3: Goodyear car service Lot 4: carpet store .Lot 5: not planned yet Alternatives 1. Require dedication of permanent right —of —way within 100 feet of the center line of the proposed White Bear Avenue ramp and 70 feet of the center line of the proposed Southlawn ramp and temporary construction easements as shown on the Minnesota.Department of Transportation's (MnDOT) plan. 2. Require dedication of right —of —way for the Southl awn ramp onl T h i s would probably eliminate the option of a future ramp to White Bear Avenue. 3.. Table action until the July 23 council meeting to get commitments from :MnDOT and the major property owners in the area. 4. Approve the plat with no right —of —way dedication, thereby, eliminating a White Bear Avenue s l i p ramp. Comments This plat forces the city to. consider a major decision on a slip ramp from I -694 to County Road D. The pros and cons of a slip ramp have already been discussed as part of the Maplewood West Boulevard plan amendment. Council must. now decide whether to require dedication of right — of =way for the slip ramp and, if so, where the ri ght —of —way should be acquired. If t h is pl at. is approved without dedication of right —of —way, the result hctI by ,o , n� MEMORANDUV, ad Mod f. i erl___.� ]ReJected 'TO.: City Manager Date FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat LOCATION: County Road D APPLICANT: C. H. Luther OWNER: Tousley Development Corp. PROJECT: Tousley Addition DATE: May 24, 1984 SUMMARY Request Approval of a preliminary plat that would replat part of the Viking Development Addition into five lots. (See page 7 .) Proposed Development Lot 1: car wash (approved by the community design review board) Lot 2: Kinder Care Day Care Center (tabled by the community design review board.) r Lot 3: Goodyear car service Lot 4: carpet store .Lot 5: not planned yet Alternatives 1. Require dedication of permanent right —of —way within 100 feet of the center line of the proposed White Bear Avenue ramp and 70 feet of the center line of the proposed Southlawn ramp and temporary construction easements as shown on the Minnesota.Department of Transportation's (MnDOT) plan. 2. Require dedication of right —of —way for the Southl awn ramp onl T h i s would probably eliminate the option of a future ramp to White Bear Avenue. 3.. Table action until the July 23 council meeting to get commitments from :MnDOT and the major property owners in the area. 4. Approve the plat with no right —of —way dedication, thereby, eliminating a White Bear Avenue s l i p ramp. Comments This plat forces the city to. consider a major decision on a slip ramp from I -694 to County Road D. The pros and cons of a slip ramp have already been discussed as part of the Maplewood West Boulevard plan amendment. Council must. now decide whether to require dedication of right — of =way for the slip ramp and, if so, where the ri ght —of —way should be acquired. If t h is pl at. is approved without dedication of right —of —way, the result development would make future acquisition for a White Bear Avenue ramp f i-nanci al ly infeasible because of the cost of buying out future businesses. If no right -of -way is required, -� t may still be possible to build a Southlawn ramp. The existing White Bear Avenue ramp would have to be retained or County Road D used as.access to White Bear Avenue. These alternatives are not favored by MnDOT and would make approval of a slip ramp more difficult, if not out of the qeustion. This plat should be tabled until MnDOT decides.whether they will approve a s ramp and participate in i costs. There is enough evidence f rom the Northeast Area Transportation study and the Benshoof report to pursue this p roject with MnDOT. The planning commission recommended that the right —of— way for a sli ramp be preserved until a decision is made on the feasibility of construction. There is also support from the major landowners in the area. On the other hand, there i no point requiring right — of — way, if MnDOT w i l l , not ap a ramp. The c i t y has already received a letter from MnDOT (page 1 2 } expressing reservations about a slip ramp, but they will not take a firm - position without doing a study. Recommendation Table action, no later than the July 23 council meeting to get a commitment from MnDOT on whether a ramp woul d be approved, which alternatives would be ap proved and how much of the cost they would participate in. The. major property owners in the area should also be prepared on this date to commit to financial participation. BACKGROUND 11 Site Description Acreage: 9.6 Existing land use: undeveloped , Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Highway 694 Easterly: Midas muffler Southerly: County Road D Westerly: single dwelling Past Actions r 1974: The Northeast Maplewood Street Improvement Feasibility Study did not propose a slip ramp (page 8 ). 1975: The Northeast Area Transportation Study recommended a slip ramp and frontage road (page 9 ). This study was prepared for Ramsey County with the agreement of northeast area cities (including Maplewood), the Metropolitan Council and the Minnesota Department of Transportation. The study was approved by the Metro- politan Council in 1977 and Ramsey County. It was accepted, but not approved by Maplewood. 1979: The Maplewood Transportation Plan, done by Barton- Aschman, does not proposed a slip ramp (page 10 ). March, 1984: The Traffic Study for the Maplewood West Area, by Jim Benshoof for William Korstad, recommends a s.lip ramp (page 11 ). 3- 27 -84: The design review board approved a car wash for lot one. 4 -2 -84: The planning commission recommended that the c i ty acti vel y seek to preserve the right —of —way for a s l i p ramp from I -694 to a future. Southl awn Drive, unti 1 a decision is made on the feasibility of construction. The commission also recommended that staff be authorized to send a letter to the Minnesota Department of Transportation requesting a slip ramp from I -694 to proposed Southlawn Drive. Staff should also be authorized to study means of preserving the right -of -way. 3 5- 22 -84: t The community design review board tabled action on the Kinder Care business proposed for lot 2 until a decision is made on right -of -way acquisition.- Planning Land use plan designation: SC,service commercial Zoning: BC, business commercial Section 30 -6 (e) of city code states that "The city council may require that a reasonable portion of any proposed subdivison be dedicated to the public or preserved for public use as streets and sim-i l ar u t i l i t i e s and improvements." Section 30 -5 (c) states that ". a subdivision application shall be pre- liminarily approved or disapproved within 120 days following delivery of an application completed in compliance with'the city ordinance by the applicant to the city, unless an extension of the review period has been agreed to by the applicant." This application was received on April 3. A decisio must, therefore, be made by J u l y 23. 1. Planning commission recommendation 2. City cour+�c.i 1 holds a public hearing and makes the final decision. n 4-4- ---, ^ 1-%m ^n + c- 11 vocation map 2. Property line /zoning map 3. Preliminary plat 4. N.E. Maplewood Feasibility Study _ 5. N.E. Area Transportation Study 6. Major street plan 7. Benshoof traffic study 8. MnDOT letter 9. Preliminary plat (revised 4 -5 -84 /separate attachment) 4 HEIGHTS Ftl WHITE BE AR LAKE 5� - LQ COUNTY J AD W CG � vp i W WOODL A FURKSS P CT. LYD I A a l a * a w ` s ! t Y � PLE L ANE AVE a flEA MAP VI w o , 3i R4 AT C, Jil of _ _ =/i • Cam') / C , , PR I VA T E STREET V, 49 O (M«saai AV E' NORT W W 1 T30NR22W /4 / 3 T29NR22W I I WE. � SEAM r — � N / W t W KpHLMAN AVE. 0 4n W KOHLMAN AVE. Cr h a 23 VI _ ROAD C '� 2640 N. Fin _ J ,r Z' u EDQENILL R0. Z DEMONT AVE. _ lu t W h- RooK AYE 2 N AV SEX VAI G 6 ANDVIEW I _1V H VIKINGDA. SHERREN AV fAIS AVE. 36 AV 11 th AVE. RVAI AV E, 2400 N. COURT AITL P►vw, 36 c R EN AVE. LOCATION MAP attachment one i i f_ s moo. s9 Qs. 9y 33�. `' � 1 _- iP z?, BBB• jz ! 4 45 1 r T Sv 8. 45 INTERSTATE 694 t ! VIK . g �' ! � MIOA� A DDITI M FTL ER U Q 3 : SHOP o I i --, ., -., r-- a - -l" COUNTY ROAD D CHILDR NS �►+ P LACE _ .h v o, � O. � 'S 0 0 1 �Z 9 ✓ �i 7c Q N I PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 9 attachment two II '15S lFf H o DZ ao� i /9 71' ! •� Q N I PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 9 attachment two I= 1 b ti t 4 ,/•+ • 11t r 1 t ' ~ ♦' i >z 1 So • � � _..• .. { � .rte+ ^� ♦♦ ►' t ' � - � -� ._r__ 1 � ' .. � w sue- � •�r.T- . �1�.�w - J_ -._ .� -�• � . =r..• w a r --..' � . � M s o M6 - rwf =T � u � r w.w w. •.w ��� Ty FsA" t LESENC 1 its -0,400 ._.w ...... ­_ 6 -- -.__ LOCATION MAC w r0"•@MW* wow -7 N um r - C w WORD r .� r r� _- -. > WCALS 11-40 .� ��� • s • Sven • •M• SITE DATA LEGAL PRELIMINARY PLAT __ _. �.�.�.-�- TOUSLEY ADDITION �� u • r� ... �... •—"— TOU$LEY DEVELOPMENT CORP. 9926 rarrTtw ntAw N wY• / WW •fan uuct , W PRELIMINARY PLAT — , — — Proposed right —of —way attachment three I i� Wo -A 11 qk MAW LEGEND — STAGING - - NORTHEAST MAPLEWOOD FEASIBILITY STUDY _:= ... S 8 Attachment four • a J • —: • V to to % ; r 44 Ir pool I r ,� s I f tir r �.+ 1 �`, r� �' 1 1 t. :. ''� `~' '� .. ►�. , : r� , • , •• 1 OR Goo EDO Al iV � f _ 4v J t Pi it fa •� / �L \� 1 '••t it ••III• lj •� !'�. •�.�'''� .. ' y �. `, .,� �. .. Not 1 • 1 1• .. . - -� r _ r -y F i r T 1A op 1 79-1 lot of 000 t -- { ,', • :�.,,: , �, r �-;:' 1 •'''Iu •. - .. �r o q t.. F YE • �-� . 'a ;.�j • A a• I I , v A 1 �• 1 • or • 1 F� . r I' IR . • • . . Kv 7-'v Ap 1 1•{ • 1 . c... � ♦ �:.. .. _ . � .. �, •,.� .• ,a ` .. � . �� -a � i•� � ` +' bra .X • y( 11 I r11+ �, • . - rot � � ` .rte j �j� , , t / " �•+ , x �: •* (w p • ,. / fr 1 t ��ry11i - , �f' 1 ` fi"' 'r' �l IL I iS 4 . li p tu - � I ? �1 .0 L r .✓ • •� • �• t• 1• • o f" I • , '1 1 1k' `I' tJ1 '',/ i1• �� ! " �tt ♦ } .x.,�..��.. 14 OC 1 J. r . I Source: Figure 18 Northeast Area Tr Inc June 1975 fi Study Barton- Aschman Associates, .. WILLIAM B. KORSTAD' TRAFFIC STUDY FOR ULTIMATE ROADWAY SYSTEMS FROM MAPLEWOOD WEST AREA NORTHEAST AREA TRANSPORTATION BENSHOOF AND ASSOCIATES S TUD Y ' TMNSMAfAVON K/MWQ �WO ENOINEEilWO OOItSUITIUif R tvIvI'" O N►oN�n ►,cw►+rs . oa 000 fl -.. A I FT Irwn r`f I1I1` ., a rrr w Mom 2111% ; . t " � M th,s is br m lurpv�"� only and off rV be used where DI d •••••• t r .. + IrrJI r • Wl. ce LItttt tA.A94 In „ TV •tslit �� •�1r�ri11�.ti t .� t » t • t t t fit" • • • �4� ,. ss 4i lb IF or 10 . •- r / * I •• � ' ;M in ' n Ittt tt�t !,,,►.;fit . f ; �+'' • i . r � I soq 1 ra,Y' i 1 tlJr� ; •' 1►y� � t• . ri c+ LA W c+ X major. street plan S ( 1115 moi a r� I � I lM i t r. •• Principal, Intermediate Arterials ...,... Major Arterial Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Co I l e c for Interchange Source: Maplewood Transportation Plan, Barton-- Aschman, 1979 Revised: 10••6 - u1 w w"as 14100 e.." • we ,t. PAUL -�a "ar" It PAUL ' • a +r 'J. ION SM t . Nor 3 .. � M 11 r � -. • Poll + I Pots 1s tow ' IAL Now fiww�►- if . _ MmdL So- 'W ' t .. w de•..... •• .... . .� �..�•• ra ► •..r .• coma i •�. ........ i �► j 1000,0111 worp4p ges @of& ILIDGPOP ..TV 6V , �j 1 , , r or I I • 1 f boo &A" iwih- J c+ a S (D C- W Reconstruct As Full Diamond I nterchan a Per Mn /DOT' s P 1 ans I -694 06, • ... ......... ....... .... Ramp To Co :, . , ......:.......•: :•::�•...:_..::: :::�••.......•• •.. ;:::. Construct New E x i t „ » Rd . D And Southl awn D r • COUNTY ROAD 4 • • • • Construct South l awn Dr. Between • Co Rd. D And Beam Ave. (Major EnIar a Radius Collector Woodlynn, LX a � Ft � 2 A A rJ oQ t � • J � ]Cti V A d Y 4 cc U M A VE. AV Connect Co. Rd . D And Beam Ave , PI an Local Streets And Devel opma Per Count 's Plan ment Access Points To Provide •...::::•:•.•.: Effective Access , To Balance ' O 4J ... Traff 1 c Usage Among Avai 1 abl e Intersect ons And To Mai ntai n ��-- `° L of Service C At All ---- �, o Le N x ° I ntersecti ons to k. +; E 4 ; 0 1000' XOMLMAN AYE. CD cn KaNl.�iAN A App rox . Sc a 1 e WILLIAM B. KORSTAD TRAFFIC STUDY . FIGURE 3 FOR RECOMMENDED ROADWAY MAPLEWOOD WEST AREA SYSTEM PLAN BENSHOOE AND ASSOCIATES ' TRANSPORTATION PLANN*O AND ENOiNEER"O CONSULTANT= it t"t" b ,�� t- I.)f'1)cil "tll�t'llt t)f rai1s � G District 9 � 3 3 48-50 H ac � l c v .-'�, c T i t _ OF TRP� 1 �' � � I C) Mil St. aul, N inn sOtc� 5 Ma 9, 1984 Jr Telephone Mr. Geoff Olson Planning Director City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Geoff: 779 -1210 As you requested at our April 18 meeting, S am writing to outline the District's reaction to your I - 694 /White Bear Avenue eastbound offramp modification proposal. These comments are based on the concept, drawn by us, of which you have a copy, that shows bringing the ramp off of eastbound I -694 just east of the Burlington Northern bridge, allowing a slip ramp off to County ''D" at proposed Southlawn Drive, and having the ramp exit onto White Bear Avenue as it does presently. We do have reservations regarding this proposal. From a design perspective the ramp is too long (3500 feet), slip ramps are not common to the Interstate system, "si in " the various movements would be a problem, and slip ramp maintenance � g would be inefficient (costly). This unusual design may prove to be unsafe, and is not consistent with Mn /DOT and Federal Highway Administration policy to pro- vide uniform interchange configurations. Fro m a capacity perspective the proposed ramp modification may not be needed. p y P ers P If the ramp termini intersections of I -694 and White Bear Avenue reach unaccept- able. levels of service, there remain other, more standard and less costly, congestion remedies. From a planning perspective annin ers ective the proposed modification is not needed if its purpose is to correct local access and /or capacity deficiencies created by a lack of , a suitable local street support system or by excessive access to adjacent land par - eels. Amelioratin g local transportation problems via Interstate modifications is not thought to be appropriate. Finally, fro P P m a costs and priorities erspective, if the ramp modification was to be constructed, it is likely that the City would need to provide the necessary rights of needed as well as the approximately three quarters of a million � way dollar construction costs (a.very rough estimate). If the City wishes to further pursue this proposal I suggest that you formally ask Mn/ DOT (request of our District Engineer, Kermit McRae) to participate in a joint study. Such a study would likely entail design and other activities aimed at getting approvals from Mn /DOT and the Federal Highway Administration, and, possibly, from the Metropolitan Council. An f- yuvl opportunitY Employer Y - Mr. Geoff Olson May 9, 1984 Page two t happy g would be ha to o over these reservations and procedures with you in more detail if you like. Please keep me informed of the status of your proposal. Sincerely, _y Je Skelton District Planning Coordinator t 13 t t t B. Prel i mi nary P1 at- -Tousl ey Addition _ • Y/_ Secretary Ekstrand said the request is fora approval of a preliminary " PP p e iminary plat that would repl at part of the Viking Development Addition into five , commercial lots. Staff is recommending this item be tabled endi n P g receipt of information .from MnDOT as to whether a ramp will be constructed from 694. He presented a plan showing the ramp, which was prepared by MnDOT in response to the Benshoof report. Director Haider said the question of the ramp has been discussed a number of times. The proposal is to have a single ramp which would split in two different directions. One leg would go to County Road D to the approximate area where Southlawn Drive would be. The other leg of'the ramp continuing on to White Bear Avenue. This is the best alternative they could come up with. There is also a problem with signing in the area. It is necessary to advise people where will end up. :There i s also concern with the cost of construction with a ramp such as this. It is estimated a 3/4 million dollar range. That would be a city cost not MnDOT. Staff is trying to work with MnDOT as to a final decision or answer on the position of the ramp. The commission discussed with Director Haider various alternatives to the location of the ramp Director Haider indicated that the city is concerned with obtaining good traffic circulation this area, whereas, MnDOT i-s concerned with moving traffic from city to city on their system. Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment concerning the proposal. Hami 1 ton Luther, Tousl ey . Development, said they are the company that made the subdivision application. They are aware of the problem that the planners are faced with and he hopes the meeting with the Highway Depart— ' meet will solve. He wishes the commission to know that they had already -= sold four of the lots prior to making application for the subdivision. The buyers are anxious to get started with construction of their businesses. There has also been an offer on the remaining fifth lot, which they did not accept because of the uncertainty of the off —ramp problem. • The commission asked what would happen if ther IS not., a aec i rz 011', reacrhec :by .J u 1 y 2 3. 'Director Haider indicated ht thought the plat would automatically be approved according to state law. Commissioner El l of son moved 4 , of the preliminary plat 'for additional information with Commissioner Robens seconde ;* El 1 of son, Fischer, the planning commission table consideration the Tousley Addition until the staff obtains regard to the slip ramp with the MnDOT. d Ayes--Commissioners Axdahl , Larson, Pel l i sh, Robens, Si gmundi k, Whitcomb t 4 Z Ti LAIS, BANNIGAN &KELLY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 5TH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 DONALD L. LAIS JOHN F. BANNIGAN. JR. PATRICK J. KELLY Mayor, CouncihTe and Manager City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, NN 55109 April 5, 1984 .Action by Council; End orsed__.. Mods f i ed AREA CODE 612 �`� 224-3781 Reiecte- Date Re: Maplewood Racquetball Club, Inc. vs City of Maplewood Project No. 79 -1, Parcel 3 Dear Honorable Mayor, Councilmembers and Manager: Maplewood Racquetball Club, owner of Parcel 3, took a timely appeal from the a.ssessrnents levied in the amount of $41, 399.2 3 for the so- called "Cope Avenue Connection" known as Project 79 -1. During the pendency thereof, the owners obtained an appraisal indicating a benefit in the amount of $29,528.45. The spread in tostimny at trial would have been $11,870.780 We initially offered to split the difference or reduce the as se s stunt by $5,935.390 , During the course of negotiations and through visitations on site with the City's Engineer, it was determined that certain additional costs would have to be incurred by the property owner to take advantage of the utilities assessed for. In particular, due to elevation adjustments made in the field during the course of construction, private development costs increased and ultimately the reduction proposed was recornnended and authorized at $9,000.00 rather than the initial $6,000,00 mentioned herei..nbefore . It is our reconvendation to the Council that it ratify the settlement that it P reviously approved in concept and further reduce the assessments retroactively by $9,000.00 A. a"49CAC JB:cg LAIS BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 5TH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 DONALD L. LAIS JOHN F. BANNIGAN, JR. PATRICK J. KELLY Mr, Barry Evans Maplewood City Manager 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 .Dear Mr. Evans: AREA CODE 612 224 -3781 June 20, 1984 Res Maplewood Public In pravement Project No. 79 -1, Parcel No. 3 Maplewood Racquetball Club, Inc., The above matter is one of two pending appeals from special assessments lei �p levied for the rove - ent of the so- called Cope Avenue Connection, Settlement by g reducin the assessments from $41,399.23 to $32.399.23 was authorized and agreed upon in the enclosed Stipulation. I am forwardin g to Y ou the original and two copies of the Stipulation together with a copy of a proposed form of Resolution reducing the existing settlement by $ 9 0 0 0.0 0 . After counc i. l approval,, I would appreciate receiving a certified copy of the Resolution and the Minutes incorporating it for purposes of releasing certain escrows being held from the owners. Lastly, n addition to the certified copy of the . Resolution j , could I please y the full executed St have the original and one copy of y back for P filing with the Clerk of Ramsey County District Court? Sincerely, if Banni JB: cg Enclosures C: Lucille Aurelius `STATE OF MINNESOTA , COUNTY OF RAMSEY YAPLEVMD RACQUETBALL CLUB, INC. , a Minnesota corporation, Appellant, vs C I# Y OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, SOTA, a municipal corporation, Respondent. DISTRICT COURT SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FILE N0, 453201 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL AS TO PARCEL NUMBE 3 IN THE MA=R OF THE APPEAL FROM SPECIAL ASSESS=S R I= IMPRDVEMENT PFC= NO. 79 -1 PURSUANT TO M.S.A. 429.081 THIS STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL AS TO PARCEL NO. 3, entered into this day of April,. 1984, by and between: MAPLEWOOD RACQUETBALL CLUB, INC, , a Minnesota Corporation, Appellants above named, hereinafter referred to as the "Owner".. and CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, a municipal corporation, Respondent above named, hereinafter referred to as the "City ". WITNESSETH : WHEREAS , That the Owner is the f ee owner of record of Parcel No. 3 more particularly described as follows to-wit: That part of Block 18, Lots 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25, Block 13 and . adjacent vacated street in Clifton Addition described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 16, Block 13, Clifton Addition, thence South 89 degrees, 15 minutes, 50 seconds East along the North line of Block 13 a distance of 379. 61 feet to the point of beginning of the property herein to be described; thence South 29 degrees, �.4 minutes West a distance of 117.56 feet to the North line of dedicated street; thence North 60 degrees, 46 minutes West a distance of 368.09 feet to the East line of Atlantic Street; thence North 0 degrees, 44 minutes East along the East line of Atlantic Street a distance of 68.06 f eet to the South line of State Highway No. 36; thence South 89 degrees, 13 minutes, 15 seconds East along the South line State Highway No. 36 a distance of 379.43 feet; thence South 0 degrees, 13 minutes, 45 seconds West a distance of 40. feet; thence South 0 degrees, 44 minutes West a distance of 100.09 feet to the point of beginning, except .easements, restrictions, reservations and rights of the City of Maplewood, if any, of record; WHEREAS The Owner pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.061 and 429.081 has taken a timely appeal from that special assessment for local public improvement project number 79 -1 levied July 30, 1981; and WHEREAS The City adopted a special assessment roll for local public improvement project number 79 -1 insofar as the same pertains to said Parcel 3, in the amount of $41,399.23 f or street, curb and gutter, sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer; and WHEREAS, The parties hereto, through the undersigned, their respective attorneys of record, desire to compromise and settle these pending proceedings. -2- NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as f of lows : 1. That as to Parcel No. 3, the assessments levied by the City Council on July 30, 1981 were as follows, to -wit : a) 368.09 front feet of sanitary sewer at $12.65 O per front foot equals $4,656.34; b) One six -inch sanitary sewer service at $626.13; c) 368.09 front feet of water main at $33.16 per front foot equals $12,205.86; d) One six -inch water service at $824.89; e) One 1� water service at $119.13; f) 60,424 square feet of non - residential storm sewer at $.09 per square foot equals $5,434.43; and g) 368.09 front feet of street, curb and gutter at $47.62 per front foot equals $17,528-45 for a total assessment of $41,399.23. 2. That the assessment levied for street, curb and gutter be .reduced from $17,528.45 to $8,528.45 thereby reducing the gross assessment to $32,399.23. 3. That the effective date of the reduction be July 30, 1981 and that the payment of the first installment of the reduced assessment, -3- including principal and interest shall be computed as of the date of the initial levy and be paid over the number of years as originally set forth by said City, July 30, 19810 4. That the Owner, through the undersigned, their attorney, hereby waives any and all right of .further notice and appeal as PLUw16 for in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, as amended. 5. That the above proposed reduced assessment is accepted by the City, through the undersigned, its attorney, and shall constitute the special assessment for local public improvements against said Parcel No. 3 and that said Parcel No. 3 is hereby found to benefit by said local public improvements in the amount of the reduced assessment levied therefor. d. That the terms and provisions of those Maplewood City Council Resolutions adopting said Project 79 -1 assessment roll insofar as they are riot otherwise inconsistent herewith, are incorporated herein by reference. 7. That the Maplewood City Clerk shall, upon appropriate City Council action, forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of the reduced assessment as deteremined hereunder to the Ramsey County Auditor to be extended on the property tax list of said County and said assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes save and except that the Owner shall not be liable for -4- penalties and interest on penalties through and including the date hereof. 8. The above- entitled action having been hereby fully compromised and settled, it is stipulated and agreed that the same may be, and hereby is, dismissed on its merits with prejudice and the Clerk of the above- -named District Court, upon filing of this Stipulation, is hereby authorized and directed to dismiss said action of record* IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals all as of the day and year first above - written. EDWARD J. HANCE, I4w MAPLEWOOD RACQUETBALL CLUB, INC., Offices, Ltd. _ ; '` ; a Minnesota Corporation, ,r B E41ward 11 Hance �ttorn for Appellants St. Anthony National Bank Building, Suite 200 2401 Lowry Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, MN 55418 (612) 781 -4858 LAIS, BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. By. /' n F. BaYini an, Jf. a M le�ood Cit At �orneys 40idwest F ral Bldg. East 5th Street St. Paul, MN 55101 (612) 224 -3781 By By CITY OF MAPLEWOOD , RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, BY Its Mayor By Its Manager -5- RESOLUTION NO. 84- - STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMS E Y CITY OF MAPLEWOOD WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood, on July 30, 1981, assessed certain real property located generally at the Northeast quadrant of the intersection of Cope Avenue and Atlantic Street south of Minnesota State Trunk Highway No. 36 for Maplewood Public Improvement Project No. 79 -1, identified therein as Parcel No. 3, for certain sanitary sewer mains and services, water mains and services, non - residential storm sewer, street, curb and gutter, and the fee owner thereof, Maplewood Racqetball Club, Inc., took timely appeal therefrom to the Ramsey County District Court; and WHEREAS , the City and the Owner have entered into a Stipulation of Settlement and Dismissal dated the --- day of April, 1984, whereunder the assessments levied July 30, 1981 for said aforementioned local public improvements reduced by $9,000.00 f rom $41,399.23 to $32,399.23; and WHEREAS, the City Attorney, by his letter of even date with said Stipulation recommended a reduction as above - indicated; and WHEREAS , the Council of the City of Maplewood finds that the above- referenced property has increased in market value by the amount of $32,399.23 and that said.increase in market value is directly attributable to the public improvements hereinbefore described. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Maplewood that the special assessments levied against Parcel No.3 more particularly described therein from $41,399.23 to $32,399.23 effective July 30, 1981 and that said special assessment and all other particulars remain and be the same as originally adopted. Adopted this day of 1984, CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA By Its Mayor By Its Manager ATTEST: City Clerk