Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1984 06-11 City Council Packet
AGENDA Maplewood City Council 6:30 P. M. , Monday, Oune 11, 1984 Municipal Administration Building Meeting 84 -12 (A) CALL TO ORDER (B) ROLL CALL (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Meeting 84 -10, May 14, 1984 20 Meeting 84 -11 May 24, 1984 (D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA (E) CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one notion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion on these items. If discussion i s des i red, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Accounts Payable 2. Traffic Signal Anreement: Co. Rd. C & 61 3. Time Extension: Leonard's Oak Hills #5 4. Final Plat: Ti 1 sen's 11th Addition 5. Nature Center Fifth Anniversary Funds 640 Resolution on Public Improvement Project 78 -10 70 Budget Transfer - Audit Costs 89 Special Assessment Interest Rates (F) PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 6:35: Assessment Hearing - Holloway 2. 7:00: PUD & IDR Note -St. Paul's Business Center East 3. 7 :10: IDR -Ki ndercare 40 7:15: Variance -1383 Summer Ave. (Kasmirs-ki 50 7:30: Plan Amendment- Mapl ewood West Blvd, 6. 7:45: Prel imi nary Plat: Tousl ey Addition 740 8:00: PUD Revision /Prel . Plat - Cave's Century 4th Addition 80 8:15: Housemovi ng -1525 S. Sterl i (G) AWARD OF BIDS (H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Mater Supply N. of Beam to West of 61 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, May 14, 1984 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 84 -10 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Greavu, B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present MaryLee Maida, Councilmember Present Michael T. Wasi luk, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes No. 84 -09 (April 23, 1984) Councilmember Anderson . moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 84 -09 (April 23, 1984) as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5, 6. Slopes H i ghwood Avenue Trailer Park A.M.M. Nature Center Police Budget Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Council removed Items E -2 and 7 from the Consent Agenda to become Items I -6 and 7. Councilmember Anderson moved, seconded by Councilmember Bastian, Ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda Items 1, 3 through 6 as recommended: .1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses, Check Register dated 04 -27 -84 through 05 -04 -84 - $214,982.51: Part II - Payroll - Checks dated 05-04 - 84 - $63,518-.02) in the amount of $278,500.53. 2. Budget Transfer - Administrative Intern -1- 5/14 M See Item I -6 3. Donation From Maplewood Coin Club Accepted the $100 donation from the Maplewood Coin C l u b and designate it for the purchase of cardtables to be used at the Heritage Center and also that a letter expressing appreciation and gratitude be sent to the Coin Club. 4. Public Hearing Industrial Revenue Note - Kinder Care Learning Center - County Road D Resolution No. 64 -5 -62 RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF A NOTICE OF THE HEARING WHEREAS, (a) Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, known as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (the "Act" )gives municipalities the power to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of the encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to prevent so far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; (b) The City Council of the City of Maplewood (the."City") has received from Kinder -Care Learning Centers, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (the "Company ") a proposal that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter described, through the issuance of its industrial revenue bonds (which may be in the form of a single debt instrument) (the "Bonds ") pursuant to the Act; (c) Before proceeding with consideration of the request of the Company it is necessary for the City to hold a public hearing on the proposal pursuant to Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b, Minnesota Statutes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: I 1 A p u b l i c hearing on the proposal of the Company will be h e l d at the time and place set forth in the Notice of Hearing hereto attached. 2. The general nature of the proposal and an estimate of the p r i n c i p a l amount of bonds to be issued to finance the proposal are described in the attached form of Notice of Hearing. 3, A draft copy of the proposed application to the Energy and Economic Develop- ment Authority, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together with proposed forms of a l l attachments and exhibits thereto, is on f i l e in the office of the City Clerk. 4. The City Clerk i s hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the hearing to be given one publication in the official news pater and a newspaper of general circulation available in the City, not less than 15 days nor more than 30 days prior to the date fixed for the hearing, substantially in the form of the attached Notice of Public Hearing. -2- 5/14 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this 14th day ` of May, 1984. /s/ John C. Greavu Mayor Attest: /s/ Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota will meet at the City Hall in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, at 7:10 p.m. on June 11, 1984, to consider the proposal of Kinder -Care Learning Centers, Inc., that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter described by the issuance of industrial development revenue bonds. Description of Project The proposed project shall consist of the acquisition of land and the construction thereon of a 5,000 square foot child learning and day care f a c i l i t y to be located on the North s i d e of County Road D, South of Highway 694, and West of White Bear Avenue (100 feet West of the Midas Muffler Shop) in the City of Maplewood,.Minnesota. The maximum aggregate estimated principal amount of bonds or other obligations to be issued to finance this project is $100,000. The project w i l l be initially owned and operated by Kinder -Care Learning Centers, Inc. The bonds or other obligations if and when issued will not constitute a charge, lien, or encumbrance upon any property of the City except the project and such bonds or obligations will not be a charge against the City's general credit or taxing powers but bill be payable from sums to be paid by Kinder -Care Learning Centers, pursuant to a revenue agreement. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Energy and Economic Development Authority, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together w i l l all attach- ments and exhibits thereto, is a v a i l a b l e for p u b l i c inspection beginning May 15, 1984, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m,,, Monday through Friday, at the City Hall in Maplewood, Minnesota. At the time and place fixed for: the Public Hearing, the City Council of the City of Maplewood will give all persons who appear the the hearing an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal. Dated thes 14th day of May, 1984. (BY ODDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL) By /s/ Lucille Aurelius City Clerk 5. Hone occupation Renewal - 1564 E. Grandview - 3 - 5/14 Approved the renewal of the conditional use permit for a tool sharpening service as a home occupation at 1564 E. Grandview for a five year period, subject to the applicant obtaining his yearly license, 6. Time Extension: Bennington Woods Approved a two -year time extension for the Bennington Woods preliminary p l a t , on the basis the applicant is making a good faith effort to develop the site in a timely manner. EA PRESENTATIONS Charles Wiger, Metropolitan Council Judy Fletcher, Metropo 1 i tan Waste Contor l Commission Mr. Wiger presented an update on the several issues before the Metro Council at this time. Mrs, F l atcher introduced Mr. Dick Berg, Controller and Mr. Ray Ode, Community Services Director, who in turn e x p l a i n e d the workings of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commi s . s- ion. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. I D. R. Refinancing - Commercial Partners - 7:00 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Commercial Partners for a $1,100,000 Commercial Revenue Note to refinance the construction of their b u i l d i n g at 1870 Bean Avenue. (Hirschfields) b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Ms. Mary Dyrseth, Briggs and Morgan, explained the proposal. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents.. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the p u b l i c hearing. g. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 84 -5 -63 PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF A REFUNDING REVENUE NOTE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 474, MINNESOTA STATUTES, TO PROVIDE FUNDS TO BE LOANCE TO COMMERCIAL PARTNERS/PIAPLEWOOD FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD (the "City ") as follows: 1. Authority. The City is, by the Constitution and Laws of the State of Minnesota Statute_s,, as amended (the "Act ") authorized to issue and sell its rev- enue notes for the purpose of undertaking an authorized project, to issue and sell notes to evidence temporary loans to be repaid from the proceeds of revenue notes -4 - 5/14 when issued and to issue revenue notes to refund, in whole or in rt, notes previously issued by the City and to enter into P • contracts necessary or convenient in the exercise of the powers 9 Y ranted b the Act and to pledge revenues of the project and otherwise secure such notes. 2 . Authorization of Note and Series of Notes. The City Council adopted a resolution on February 19, 1981 ( the "Resolution ") authorizing the issuance and sale of a revenue note of the City in the aggregate principal arr.ount of One Million One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,100, pursuant to the Act to P rovi.de money to be loaned to Corrnercial Partners /Maplewood, a Minnesota general partnership (the "Partnership ") , to finance costs of acquiring, constructing and e u i ing a commercial building in the City (the "Project Building") to be owned by the Partnership an q PP and leased to various tenants, together with necessary equiprrent (the "Project Equip to be located permanently in and be^orre a part of ) the Project Building or the site thereof (the "Project Site and necessary site inproverrents (collectively the "Project" as pore fully defined in the Loan Agreement hereinafter rrentioned) . In anticipation of the issuance of the permanent revenue notes authorized by the Resolution and in order to provide temporary financing for the Project, the City issued P P y and sold its $1,1 City of Maplewood Industrial Development Revenue Bond (Cornercial Partners /Maplewood Pr (the "Temporary Nc -.e ") which matured on February 1, 1983. The City Council also issued and sold its $1,100,000 I ndustrial Development Permanent Revenue Note (Commercial P artners / P Iewood (the Ma Project) "Permanent Note ") pursuant to the resolution adopted by this City Council on January 24 1 983. The City Council shall now issue and sell its $1,100,000 Industrial Development Refunding Revenue Note (Commercial Refundi Pject (the "Note "). The City P artners /Maplewood ding Project Council hereby etermines that it is desirable and • expedient to authorize, and the City Council does Y es hereby authorize, the issuance and sale of the Note of the City in the aggregate principal amount of One Million One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,100,000) to refund the Permanent Note. 3 Documents Presented* Forms of the following do cuments ( the7�N ` 6te Documents relating to the Note and the e nts Project have been submitted to and examined by the City Council and are now on file in the of five of the City Clerk: ( a) Loan and Purchase Agreement (the "Loan Agreement") among the Municipality, the Partnership and National City Bank of Minneapolis (the "Bank ") dated as of M ay +, 1984; ( b) Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Financi Statement (the "Mortgage") dated as of May 1984, b and between the Partnership and the Bank, whereby the Partnership mortgag es the Project Y - y act Site, the Pro Building and the Project Equipment (the Project i Facilities " ) as security fo r the Note (th's document not to be executed by the City) ; -5- 5/14 ( c) Loan Agreement Assignment (the "Assignment ") dated as of May _, 1984, whereby the City assigns to the Bank all of its interest in the Loan Agreement and Loan Re payments of the . Partnership thereunder (subject to the provisions of Section 7.05 ), fo r the P �purpose of securing p ur P the full and prompt payment of the Note; and' (d) Assignment of Rents and Leases (the "Lease Assignment") dated as of May �, 1984 from the Partnership to the Bank, whereby the Partnership assigns the rents and leases of the Project to the Bank as security for the Note ( this document not to be executed by the City). 4. Find in s . It is hereby found, determined and declared that: (a) The Project, as described in paragraph 2 hereof and in the Loan Agreement, based upon the representations of the Partnership, constitutes a revenue producing enterprise and is a project authorized by and - described in Section 4 74.02 , Subd. la of the Act. (b) The purpose of the Project is and the effect thereof will be to. promote the public welfare by: preventing the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; preventing economic deterioration; the development of sound industry and commerce to use the available resources of the community, in order to retain the benefit of the community's existing investment in educational and public service facilities; halting the movement of talented, educated personnel to other areas and thus preserving the economic and human resources needed as a base for providing governmental services and facilities; adding to the tax base of the City and the county and school district in which the Project Facilities will be located. (c) The Project ]gas been approved by preliminary resolution of the Council duly adopted August 7, 1980, after a public hearing thereon, duly called and held and has been approved by the Commissioner of Securities of the State of Minnesota as tending to further the purposes and policies of the Act and on May 14, 1984, after reasonable public notice thereof, a public hearing was held pursuant to Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, at which hearing all parties who appeared were given an opportunity to express their views with respect to the Project. (d) The issuance and sale of the Note, the execution and delivery of the Loan Agreement and the Assignment and the performance of all covenants and agreements of the City contained in the Note, the Loan Agreement and the As signment, and of all other acts and things required under the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to make the Note, Loan Agreement and the Assignment valid and binding obligations of the City in accordance with their terms, are permitted by the Act. -6- 5/14 (e) There is no litigation pending or, to the best of its knowledge threatened, against the City relating to the Project or to the Note or the Note Documents, or questioning the organization of the City or its power or g g 9 authority to issue the Note or execute and d eliver the Loan Agreement and the Assignment* - (f y The execution and delivery of and performance of the City's obligations under the Note, the Loan Agreement and the Assignment have been fully authorized by all requisite action and do not and will not violate any law, any order of any court or other agency of government, or any 9 n indenture, agreement or other instrument to which the city is a party or by which it or any of its property is bound, or be in conflict with., result in a breach of, or constitute (with due notice or lapse of time or both) a default under any such indenture, agreement or other instrument. (g) The Loan Agreement provides for payments by the Partnership to the Holder of the Note for the account of the City of such amounts as will be sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the Note when due. No reserve funds are deemed necessary for this purpose. The Loan Agreement obligates the Partnership to provide for the operation and maintenance of the Project Facilities, including adequate insurance, taxes and special assessments. (b) As required by the provisions of Section 474.10 of the Act, the Note shall recite that the Note is not to be P ayable from nor charged upon any funds other than amounts P Y a able by the Partnership pursuant to the Loan Agreement which are pledged to the payment thereof, and, in the event of default, moneys derived from foreclosure or other enforcement of the Note Documents; the City is not subject to any liability thereon; no Holder of the Note shall ever have the right to compel the exercise of the. taxing power of the City to pay the Note or the interest thereon, nor to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City; the Note shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City; and such Note does not constitute an P Y indebtedness of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. S. Approval and Execution of Documents The forms of the Mortgage, Loan Agreement, Lease Assignment and Assignment referred to. in paragraph 3 are approved. The Loan Agreement and Assignment shall be executed in the name and on behalf of the City by the Mayor and the City Clerk _ in substantially the form on file, but with all such - changes therein, not inconsistent with the Act or other law,* as may be approved by the officers executing the same, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by the execution thereof. The - 7 - 5/14 rr • contain, such revisions as Moat age and the Lease Assignment may co The Mayor and 9 b the Bank and the Partnership• Y may be approved y execute and deliver, on behalf of City Clerk are authorized to e b the Loan the City, such other documents as are required y Agreement• 6. A roval of Terms and Sale of Note. In order to the City shall proceed refund the Permanent Note, y forthwith to Refundin • • °t of Ma od Industrial Development g issue its City lewo p. Ma lewood R .Revenue Note (Commercial Partners Refunding Project), P principal al amount of $1,100,000 substantially in the authorized pr p bearing interest, payable in the in the form, maturing, 9 • se containing the provisions set forth installments and otherwi 1 which terms in the fo • rm of Note attached hereto as Exhibit • approved and incorporated in this and provisions are hereby pp Note Resolution and made a part hereof. • registered Note, substantially A single fully r in the g form of Exhibit 1 to this Note Resolution, , s h be issued and • ' the authorized principal amount of delivered to the Sank in of and 100 000 and as authorized by the Act, principal • $ 1 at the office of the interest on the Note shall be payable ' stration registered owner thereof as it appears on the regl • the City Clerk in lawful money of the records maintained by Y he B to purchase United i States of America. The proposal oft • $1,100, 000 X100$ of par valued s such Note at a price of eb hereby found and determined to be reasonable and is her Y accepted. 7. Execution • , Deli ve and Endorsement of Note. The ewritten or rinted form and shall be Note may be in typ P Mayor and the City Y M executed b the manual signatures of the ay ' seal of the City shall be affixed Clerk and the official Note shall be thereto* When so prepared and executed, the , then rice the Bank upon payment of the purchase p delivered to opinion of and upon receipt of the signed legal • op therefor, P Paul, Minnesota, bond Briggs fi Morgan of Minneapolis and St. 99 pursuant to the Loan A counsel, puns Agreement* The Note shall 9 contain a recital that it is issued pursuant to the Act, and such recital shall be conclusive evidence of the validity and regularity of the issuance thereof- $. Registration Records The City Clerk, as bond registrar, shall keep bond register in which the City shall P provide for the registration of the Note and for transfers of the Note. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to deliver a certified copy of this Note Resolution to the County Auditor of Y , f Ramsey Count together with such other information as the 9 Count Auditor may require, and obtain the certifi Y cate of the Count Auditor a s to entry of the Note on the County's bond register as required by the Y Act and Section 475.63, Minnesota Statutes. 9. Mu tilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed No te. If the Note is mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed, the City may execute and deliver to the Holder a new Note of like amount, date, number and tenor as that mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed; provided that, in the case of mutilation, the Y -8- 5/14 mutilated Note shall first be surrendered to the City, and in the case of a lost, stolen or destroyed Note, there shall be f urnished to the City and the Partnership evidence of first such losse theft or destruction satisfactory to the City and the Partnership, together with inderinnity satisfactory to them* . e P• 9 . City and Partnership may charge the Holder with their The Y reasonable fees and expenses in r eplacing an Y mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed Note. lo. Transfer of Note; Person Treated as Holder. The City will caus e to be Kept at the office of the City Clerk a Note Register s. � 'n which, subject to such reasonable regulations as it may prescribes the City shall provide for the P reg istrat i on of transfers of ownership of the Note. The Note ' registered in the name o shall be initially f the Bank and shall r g be transferable upon the Note Register by the Ba nk in p erson or • authorized in writing, upon surrender by its agent duly au of the Note to ether with a written instrument of transfer 9 • to the City Clerk, duly executed by the Bank or satisfactory Y form of assi nrnent its dui authorized agent. The following 9 Y shall be sufficient for said purpose. For value received hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Note of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint attorney to transfer said Note on the books of said City with full power of _substitution in the premises. The.undersigned certifies that the transfer be made in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 170 Dated: Registered owner Upon such transfer the City Clerk shall note the date of registration and the name and address of the new owner in the Note Register and in the registration blank appearing on the Note. The Holder seeking to transfer ownership of the Note shall also give written notice thereof to the Partnership. The Note shall continue to be subject to successive transfers at the option of the Holder of the Note. No service charge shall be made for any such transfer, but the City Clerk may require payment of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge payable in connection therewith. The person in whose name the Note shall be issued or, if transferred, shall be registered from time to time shall be deemed and regarded as the absolute Holder thereof for all purposes, and payment of or on account of the principal of and interest on the Note shall be inade only to or upon the order of the Holder thereof, or its attorney duly authorized in writing, and neither the City, the City Clerk, the Partnership, nor the Bank shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. All such payments shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon the Note to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. -9- 5/14 11. Amendments, Changes and Modifications to Loan A ree , ment Assi nment and this Note Resolution. Except pursuan to Sectiorn 9.03 of the Loan Agreement, the C ity shall not enter into or make any, change, modification, alteration or termina of the Loan A reem Assignment or this Note find 9 Resolution. 12 . Ple a t o Holder. Pursuant to the Assignment, _� City shall p ledg e and assign to the Bank and its successor the P 9 and assign of the Note all interest of the City in the revenues of t Project and the Project Facilities, including all Loan � Repay ents to be made by the Partnership under the Loan P Agreement and moneys derived from enforcement of the Note Documents in the manner and to the extent set forth in this Resolution, the Note, the Loan Agreement and the Assignment. 13. Covenants with Holders; Enforceabilit All provision of the Note and of this Note Resolution and all rep resentations P ons and undertakings by the City in the Loan A reement are hereby declared to be covenants between the City 9 and the Bank and its successor Holders of the Note and shall be Y enforceable b the Bank or any Holder in a proceeding brought for that purpose, provided that no such covenant, representation or undertaking shall ever give rise to any pecuniary liability of the City, its employees, officers or agents or constitute a charge against its general credit or taxing powers* 14. Definitions and Interpreta Terms not o therwise se defined in this Note Resolution but de f fined in the Loan Agreement shall have the same meanings in this Note Reso lution and shall be interpreted d herein as provided therein. Notices may be given as provided in Section 9.01 of the Loan In case n p rovision of this Note Resolution is Agree s a y P such for any reason illegal or invalid or inoperable, s illegality ' alit or invalidity or inoperability shall not affect the remaining p rovisions of this Note Resolution, which shall be construed or enforced as if such illegal or invalid or inop erable provision were not contained herein. 15. Election Under Internal Revenue .Code. she City hereby elects that the provisions of Section 103 b)(6)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (the "Code ") and Reg. §1.103 -10(b) (2)(vi) thereunder, permitting the issuance of tax exempt industrial development bonds in amounts up to $10,000,000 under certain conditions, shall apply to the Note, and the Mayor, the City Manager or City Clerk or any of them are authorized to execute and file the appropriate form of election under the Code and Regulations with the Internal Revenue Service. 16. Certifications. The Mayor, City Manager, City i C and other officers of the City are auth orzed and directed to prepare and furnish to Briggs & Morgan, bond counsel, to the Partn , to the Bank and to counsel for the Partnership nershi and the Bank, cert . ified copies of all proceedings e City relating to and records of th Y the Project and the Note, wired and such other affidavits and certificates as may be required _ 10 _ 5/14 to show the facts appearing from the books and records in the officers' custody and control or as otherwise known to then; and all such certified copies, certifi- cates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute repre- sentations of the City as to the truth of all statements contained therein. 17. L imi atat i on on note. transfers: The tratian un er state or o er secure yes laws, issuance; and accordingly the Note may not be or part, nor may a participation interest in p a r t i c i p a t i o n agreement, except in accordance such registration requirements. Note has been issued wi thout reg i s- pursuant to an exemption for such assigned or transferred in whole the Note be given pursuant to any with an a p p l i c a b l e exemption from EXHIBIT 1 TO NOTE RESOLUTION (Form of Note) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Industrial Deve 1 opment Refunding Revenue Note (Commercial Partners /Maplewood Refunding Project) No. R -1 $1,100,000 The City of Maplewood, a municipal corporation in the County of Ramsey and State of Minnesota (the "City ") , for value received, hereby promises to pay, but solely from the source and in the manner hereinafter provided, to National City Bank of Minneapolis (the "Bank ") or registered assigns the principal sum of One Million One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,100,000), i n installments as hereinafter provided, and to pay to the owner hereof interest on the outstanding .and unpaid balance of such p r i n c i p a l sum from the date hereof until said p r i n c i p a l sum is paid, at a rate of 11.00/ percent per annum (the "Tax Exempt Rate ") computed on the basis of the actual number of days elapsed i n a 360 day year. P r i n c i p a l and interest on this Note shall be paid ii n equal monthly installments of $ BEGINNING ON June 1, 1 984, and monthly thereafter on the first day of each, month to and including December 1, 2010, such installment payments to be applied first to accrued and unpaid interest and next to p r i n c i p a l , and on January 1, 2011 the unpaid p r i n c i p a l of and interest on this Note shall be paid. P r i n c i p a l and interest shall be paid to the registered holder hereof (the "Ho 1 der ") in lawful money of the United States at its address as it appears on the registration records maintained by the City Clerk. This Note is issued pursuant to the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act, Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, as amended (the "Act "), and in conformity with the provisions, restrictions and limitations thereof . This Note is not payable from nor charged upon any funds other than amounts payable by the Partner- ship, hereinafter mentioned, pursuant to the Loan Agreement, hereinafter mentioned, which are pledged to the payment hereof and in an Event of Default (as defined in the Loan Agreement), moneys derived from the foreclosure or Lease Assignment. The City is not subject to any l i a b i l i t y hereon; no Holder of this Note s h a l l ever have the right to compel the exercise of the taxing power of the City to 5/14 pay this Note or the interest hereon, nor to enforce payment hereof against any property of the City; and this Note shall not constitute a charge, l i e n or encum- brance, legal or equitable upon any property of the City; and this Note does not constitute an indebtedness of the City within the meaning of any constitut- ional or statutory limitation. This note is a special o b l i g a t i o n in the p r i n c i p a l amount of $1,.,,100,000, which has been authorized by law to be issued and has been issued for the purpose of refunding a permanent loan from the City to the Commercial Partners/Maplewood, a Minnesota general partnership (the "Partnership ") to finance costs of acquiring a site for and constructing and equipping a commercial retail building in the City to be owned by the Partnership and leased to various tenants (the "Project"), This Note is issued pursuant to a Loan and Purchase Agreement by and among the City, the Partnership and the Bank, dated as of May , 1984 (the Assignment between the City and the Bank dated as of May , (the "Assignment "), the Loan Agreement, the Note Resolution, a Co—m —nation Mortgage, Security Agree- ment and Fixture Financing Statement by the Partnership to the Bank of Rents and Leases dated as of May , 1984 by the Partnership to the Bank, (the "Lease Assignment ") to which Loan greement, Assignment, Note Resolution, Mortgage, Lease Assignment and amendments thereof reference is hereby made for a description and limitation of the revenues and funds pledged and appropriated to the payment of the Note, the nature and extent of the security thereby created, the rights of the Holder of the Note, the rights, duties and immunities of the Bank and the rights, immunities and obligations of the City thereunder.. Certified copies of the Note Resolution and executed counterparts of the Loan Agreement, the Assign - ment, Mortgage and Lease Assignment are on file at the office of the City Clerk. This Note shall be subject to prepayment on any interest payment date at the option of the City, at the request of the Partnership, in whole or in part, upon prepayment to the Bank of the p r i n c i p a l amount of the Note to be prepaid plus accrued interest thereon to the redemption date and a premium forth in the following tab 1 e for the designated redemption dates: Redemption Date Premium First Loan Year 5/ Second Loan Year 4 -112/ Third Loan Year 4% Fourth Loan Year 3 -1/2/ Fifth Loan Year 3/ Sixth Loan Year 2 -1/2/ Seventh Loan Year 2/ Eighth Loan Year 1 -1/2/ Ninth Loan Year 1/ Tenth Loan Year 0/ Loan Year means the successive one -year periods commencing on June 1, 1984 and subsequent Loan Years commencing on successive anniversaries of June 1, 1984. All such prepayments shall be applied to installments of principal last maturing in inverse order and shall not affect the date or amount of intervening install- ments, Notice of any such prepayment shall be given to the owner or registered assigns of this Note by certified or registered mail, addressed to him at his registered address, not less than thirty (30) days prior to the date fixed for prepayment, and shall be published, if required by law, in a financial journal circulated in the English language in the cities of Minneapolis or St. Paul, Minnesota, at least once, not less than thirty (30) days before the date so fixed for pre- - 19 - _ k:/14 . payment . At the date fixed for prepayment, funds shall be paid to the owner hereof at the office of the Bank or shall be depos i ted * wi th the Bank, sufficient to pay the Note, or the principal amount thereof to be prepaid and accrued interest thereon. Upon the happening of the above conditions, the Note thus called or the principal portions thereof prepaid shall not bear interest after the date of prepayment. This Note is subject to special mandatory redemption on February 1, 1994 at the option of the Bank unless the special mandatory redemption shall be waived in writing by the Bank or any subsequent holder of the Note, at least 180 days prior to said redemption date. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, if a Determination of Tax- ability (as defined in the Loan Agreement) shall be made, the rate of interest on this Note shall automatically increase to a rate which shall at all times be p u b l i c l y announced from time to time by the Bank as its prime rate of interest (the "Taxable Rate ") and this Note shall be deemed to have borne interest at such fixed or variable Taxable Rate from the Date of Taxability; and the Partner- ship shall upon written notice from the Holder of the Determi n i nat i on of Taxability, pay to the Holder hereof as a d d i t i o n a l interest the difference between the amount of interest actually paid on the Note from the Date of Taxability and what would have been due at the Taxable Rate (regardless of whether the Bank is the present Holder or if the Note has been paid or redeemed) and thereafter the Partnership shall pay such increased installments of p r i n c i p a l and interest at such Taxable Rate in equal monthly installments of p r i n c i p a l and interest over the remaining -maturity of this Note. The Partnership shall also pay the amounts of any interest, penalties , additions to tax and a d d i t i o n a l ' amounts referred. to in Subchapter A of Chapter 67 and Subchapters A and B of Chapter 68 -of the Internal Revenue Code or which the Bank has become liable as a result of a Determination of Tax- ability. This Note is transferable, as provided in the Note Resolution, only upon lb the bond register of the City Clerk, a s bond registrar, b v the owner hereof in person or by his duly authorized attorney, as provided in the Note Resolution. In case an Event of Default as defined in the Loan Agreement occurs, t h i s Note and the Loan Repayments (as defined in the Loan Agreement) thereafter to become due under the Loan Agreement may become immediately due and payable, in the manner and with the effect and subject to the conditions provided in the Loan Agreement. The Holder of this Note shall have the right to enforce the provisions of the Note Resolution, Loan Agreement, Assignment, Lease Assignment and Mortgage. The terms and provisions of the Note Resolution, Loan Agreement, Assignment, Lease Assignment and Mortgage, or of any instrument supplemental thereto, may be modified or altered pursuant to Section 9.03 of the Loan Agreement and para- graph 11 of the Note Resolution. This Note has been issued without registration under state or federal or other securities laws, pursuant to an exemption for such issuance; and accordingly the Note may not be assigned or transferred in whole or part, nor may a partici- pation interest in the Note be given pursuant to any participation agreement, except in accordance with an applicable exemption from such registration require- ments. It is recogn i zed that the o b l i g a t i o n s of the Partnership are non - recourse o b l i g a t i o n s to the extent provided in Section 8.04 of the Loan Agreement. 13 - 5/14 It is hereby certified and recited and the City Council has found: That the Project is an e 1 i g i b le project" def,i ned in Section 474.02, Subd la of the Act ; that the issuance of t h i s Note and the acquisition and construction of the Project will promote the public welfare and carry out the purposes of the Act; that the Project has been approved by the Commissioner of Securities of the State of Minnesota as tending to further the purposes and policies of the Act; that all acts conditions and things required to be done precedent to and in the issuance .of this Note have been properly done., have happened and have been performed in regular and due time, form and manner as required by law; and that this Note does not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of a.ny constitutional or statutory l i m i t a t i o n . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Maplewood, by its City Council, has caused this Note to be signed i n its behalf by the manual signatures of the Mayor and the City C 1 erk and sealed with the corporate seal of the City, all as of the day of , 1984. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD By /s/ John Greavu ayor And By /s/ Lucille Aurelius City Clerk (Seal) PROVISIONS AS TO REGISTRATION The ownership of the unpaid P r i n c i p a l Balance of t h i s Note and the interest accruing thereon is registered on the books of the City of Maplewood in the name of the holder last noted below. Date of Registration Name and address Registered Owner Seconded by Councilmember Maida. 2. Code Amendment: P.U.D. 7:15 P.M. Signature of C lerk Ayes - all. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a proposed Code Amendment to require four votes for approval of a planned unit develop,. (PUD) rather than the majority vote now required. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were.heard. 14 - 5/14 d. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. f Councilmember Bastian moved to refer the proposed code amendment back to the Director of Community Development or "recycling . Seconded by Counc i lmember Ma i da . Ayes - all. 3. Code Amendment: L.B.C. District - 2nd Reading (4 votes) 7:30 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a code amendment to allow office clinic and day care center uses in an LBC limited bus- i nes s commercial zone without Council approval. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Chairman Les Axdah l presented the following P l a n n i n g Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Fischer moved the P l a n n i n g Commission recommend the City Council approve the ordinance allowing offices, c l i n i cs day care centers and similar uses in the LBC zone. Commissioner Hejny seconded Ayes - Commissioner., Axdahl, Fischer, Hejny, Larson, Pellish, Robens, Sigmundik, Sietten, Whitcomb." d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f, Mayor Greavu closed the p u b l i c hearing. g. Counc i lmember Bastian introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE N0.566 AN ORDINANCE ALLOWING OFFICES, CLINICS AND DAY CARE CENTERS AS PERMITTED USES IN THE LBC ZONE THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 36 -154, LBC LIMITED BUSINESS COMMERCIAL DISTRICT is hereby amended to read as follows: (a) Permitted uses: offices, medical or health related clinics and day care centers. Sect ion 2. T h i s ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication, Seconded by Counc i lmember Was i 1 uk . Ayes - all. G. AWARD OF BIDS None. - 15 - 5/14 H., UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Holloway Avenue Assessments a Manager Evans presented the staff report. 1 4P b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the proposal and how the rates were calculated. C,, Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption g4- 5 -64 WHEREAS, the City Clerk and City Engineer have presented the final figures for the improvement of Holloway Avenue, Project No. 81 -12; NOUN, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, NaNNESOTA, that the City Clerk and City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and they shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the City office for .inspection. FURTHER, the Clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the Council thereof. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. d. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 84- 5 -65 WHEREAS, the Clerk and the Engineer will, at the direction of the Council, prepare an assessment roll for the construction of Holloway Avenue Improvement, Project No, $1 -12, and the said assessment roll will be on file in the office of the City Clerk; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF NIAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the llth day of June, 1984, at the City Hall at 6 :30 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners of all property affected by said assessment. 31 The notice of hearing shall state the date, time, and place of hearing, the general nature of the improvement, the area proposed to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll is on file with the Clerk, and that written or oral objections will be considered. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. - 16 - 5/14 2. County State Aid Designation a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 - 5 - 66 WHEREAS, Ramsey County proposes to locate and establish as County State Aid Highways the roads hereinafter described within.the City of Maplewood: County Road D (proposed CSAH 19) from .357 miles west of TH 61 to Beam Avenue (.589 miles); Beam Avenue (proposed CSAH 19) from .080 miles west of TH 61 to White Bear Avenue (1.516 miles); and Lydia Avenue (proposed CSAH 19) from White Bear Avenue to Bellaire Avenue (1.124 miles); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Maplewood that said de- signations are approved, subject to approval by the Board of Ramsey County Com- missioners and the Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota. WHEREAS, Ramsey County proposes to revoke the County State Aid Highway de- signations within the Cities of Vadnais Heights and 1aplewood and Town of White Bear of the following roads: County Road D from .357 miles west of TH 61 to Bellaire (2.777) miles; and Bellaire Avenue from Lydia Avenue to County Road D (.24 miles); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Maplewood that these roads are hereby revoked as County State Aid Highways of Ramsey County subject to the approval of the Board of Ramsey County Commissioners and the Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that these roads will be transferred to the jurisdictions of Maplewood, Vadnais Heights and White Bear; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized to forward two certified copies of this resolution to the Public Works Director of Ramsey County who will submit them to the Board of Ramsey County Commissioners and Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota for his consideration. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. c. Councilmember Maida introduce the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 - 5 - 67 WHEREAS, there is limited sight distance at the intersection of Beam Avenue and Lydia Avenue; and WHEREAS, this condition is aggrevated by parked vehicles along Bellaire Avenue; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood that - 17 - 5/14 Ramsey County is requested to consider establishing a No Parking zone for 100 feet north and south of the centerline of Lydia Avenue on both sides of Bellaire Avenue, Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. ' Ayes - all. 3. Street and Alley Vacations: Burr and Ripley a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. The following area residents voiced their opinions: Mr. Al Grenz, 1771 Burr ,.lr . Fri Chard LeFebrue Mr. Norval Hennings, 1781 Burr C. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption ems. WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood, initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following described real property: Ripley Avenue between DeSoto Street and Burr Street in Section 17, Township 29, Range 22 WHEREAS, the following adjacent properties are affected: 1. Subject to streets and easements and except the north 495 feet of the west 163 feet of,the southwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of Section 17, Township 29, Range 22. Unplatted Lands, 2. Lots one and five, block five, Kings Addition to the City of, St. Paul, 3. Subject to streets and easements and except the west 163 feet lying south of the north 30 feet and except the east 163 feet of the west 489 feet of the south 85 feet of the north 455 feet of the southwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of Section 17, Township 29, Range 22. Unplatted Lands. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. This vacation was initiated by the City of Maplewood on February 22, 1984; 2. T h i s vacation was reviewed by the Planning Commission on April 16, 1984. The P 1 an,n i ng Commission recommended to the C i ty Counc.i 1 that t h i s vacation , be approved, 3. The City Council h e l d a p u b l i c hearing on April 23, 1984 to consider t h i s vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Plan- ning Commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above described street, public interest in the property will accrue to the following described abutting properties. NOW 5 THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood City Council that it is in the public interest to grant the above described vacation on the basis of the - 18 - - 5/14 following findings of fact: I It 1. The construction of Ripley Avenue as a roadway is unnecessary since access to the adjacent vacant land will most likely be provided farther north along DeSoto Street. 2 0 It would be in the p u b l i c interest. This vacation is subject to the retention of a utility easement over the right of way. Seconded by Councilmember Maida.. Ayes - all. d. Counc i imember Bastian introduced the following resolution and roved its adoption 84 -5 -69 WHEREAS, Richard and Gloria Jean LeFebvre initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following described real property, all in Section 17, Township 29, Range 22; 1. The alley in block three, Kings Addition to the City of St. Paul. 2. Ripley Avenue lying between the westerly alignment of Burr Street and Bradley Street, 3. Subject to streets and easements and except the west 163 feet lying south of the north 30 feet and except the east 163 feet of the west 489 feet of the south 85 feet of the north 455 feet of the southwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of Section 17, Township 29, Range 22. Unplatted Lands. WHEREAS, the procedural h i story. of this vacation is as follows: 1. This vacation was initiated by Richard and Gloria Jean LeFebvre on February 22, 1984; 2. A majority of the owners of property abutting said alley and streets have signed a petition for this vacation; 3. This vacation was reviewed by the Planning Commission on April 16, 1984. The P l a n n i n g Commission recommended to the City Council that this vacation be approved. 4. The City Council h e l d a p u b l i c hearing on April 23, 1984 to consider t h i s vacation, Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and P l a n n i n g Commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above described streets and alley, public interest in the property will accrue to the following described abutting properties: 19 - 5/14 A Block 5, Lots 1 through 4 and Block 3, Lots 1 through 12 Kings Addition to the City of. St. Paul HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood - C i t - i ounc i 1 that it is in the best interest- to grant the above-described vacation on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. Construction of these rights -of -way for roadway purposes is infeasible, ?_. It would be in the public interest. This vacation is subject to: Rentention of a utility easement over, across and under. - Granting the owner of 1781 Burr Street and easement over Ripley Avenue lying between Burr and Bradley Street and over that portion of Burr Street right -of -way west of the northerly 20 feet of Lot 6, Block 3 -That the driveway be used for driveway purposes only and that there be a limitation of parked vehicles or obstructions or any other use of the driveway -That there be a maintenance agreement between the owner of 1781 Ripley Avenue and the owners of your client's property Seconded by Counciimember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. - 20 - 5/14 I. NEW BUSINESS 1. McClelland Court Watermain a.. meager Evans presented the staff report, b.. Director of Public Works Ken Haider explained the proposal. C., Mrs. Pam Weber, 195 McClelland Street, stated that she and her husband had tried to obtain a petition requesting the improvement. d., Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 84 5 - 70 WHEREAS, the City Council has proposed that the area described as McClelland Street north of Brookview Drive and Hudson Place from McClelland to Ferndale be improved by construction of Watermain, City Project 84 -4; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the proposed improvement be referred to the City Engineer, who is hereby in- structed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and should best be made as proposed, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 2.. Detachment. and Annexation: 2091 Belmont Lane a. Manager Evans stated McDonald Peterson has requested his property at 2091 E. Belmont Lane be detached from Maplewood and annexed to North St. Paul for the follow- ing reasons: 1. The property owner has asked to subdivide a piece of Maplewood property that cannot be directly accessed from Maplewood. Consequently, the provision of emergency vehicle services and snow plowing would be cumbersome. 2,. North St. Paul will be building and assessing the costs for the proposed Eldridge Court cul -de -sac and utilities when they construct Ariel Street, Eldridge and Burke Avenues this summer. Assessment of costs to the applicant's property would require Maplewood Council approval if the property is to remain in Maplewood. 3. The owner and the City of North St. Paul are in favor of this annexation. b. Mr. Don Peterson, 2091 E. Belmont Lane, the applicant, spoke on behalf of his request. C, Councilmember Anderson introdu the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 -5 -71 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood of the State of Minnesota resolves that the following described property is located in the State of Minnesota County of Ramsey: All that part of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 14, T. 29, R. 22, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the center line of Section - 21 - 5/14 - 14, aforesaid, which is 334.24 feet north of the SE corner of the NE 1/4 of the. NW 1/4 of said Section 14; thence running north on said center line a distance of 571.32 feet to a point of intersection, with the Minnesota St. Croix and Wisconsin Railroad Company's right -of -way limits; thence southerwesterly along said right of way limits a distance of 307.28 feet to a point; thence south a distance of x.16.98 feet to a point and thence east a distance . of 263.59 feet to the point of beginning, containing 3 acres more or less, according to the Government Survey; WHEREAS, the above described property is now located in the City of Maplewood, abuts the City of North St. Paul and is property subject to concurrent detachment and annexation by concurrent resolutions of the two councils of the two municipalities, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 414.061; WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City of Maplewood that the above described property be concurrently detached from the City of Maplewood and annexed to the City of North St. Paul; WHEREAS, this resolution is being adopted concurrently With a similar resolution by the City Council of the City of North St. Paul approving such detachment and annexation as provided above; WHEREAS, this annexation proposal was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on May 7, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said annexation be approved. WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council considered this annexation proposal on May 14, 19840 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above de- scribed concurrent detachment and annexation shall be effective upon the issuance of the Minnesota Municipal Board's order or at such later date as provided by the Board in its order. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 3. Plan Amendment: East of DeSoto Street and South of Roselawn a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Fischer moved the commission forward the following resolution to the City Council: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the Maplewood Comprehen- sive Plan to delete the neighborhood park search area located east of DeSoto Street and south of Roselawn Avenue. This property is more commonly referred to as the Torgerson property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING CONAISSION, that the above described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. There is inadequate population potential to support this park, given that the Edgerton School grounds and Edgerton Park are within its planned service area and only two blocks away. 22 5/14 2. The stop lights at Edgerton Street provide safe pedestrian access from south of Roselawn Avenue to the Edgerton Park facilities. 3. The cost for acquisition and development would be high. 4. Nearly one - fourth of the site would be unusable because of steep slopes and a storm water pond. Commissioner Ellefson seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Ellefson, Fischer, Larson, Pellish, Robens, Sletten, Whitcomb." C. Mayor Greavu introduced the fo resolution and moved its adoption: 84 -5 -72 . WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the Maplewood Comprehen- sive Plan to delete the neighborhood park search area located east of DeSoto Street and south of Roselawn Avenue. This property is more commonly referred to as the Torgerson property. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. This plan amendment was initiated by the parks commission on March 9, 1984. 2. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 16, 1984 to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an- opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said plan amendment be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on May 14, 1984. The Council considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. There is inadequate population potential to support this park, given that the Edgerton School grounds and Edgerton Park are within its planned service area and only two blocks away. 2. The stop lights at Edgerton Street provide safe pedestrian access from south of Roselawn Avenue to the Edgerton Park facilities. 3. The cost for acquisition and development would be high. 4. Nearly one fourth of the site would be unusable because of steep slopes and a storm water pond. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 4. Tax Forfeited Land - Junction Street a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Maida introduc t he follo re solution and moved its adoption: _ 23 - 5/14 M $4 - 5 - 73 WHEREAS, Lot 1, Block 2, Hills and Dales Addition is located within the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has been informed that Lot 1, Block 2, Hills and Dales Addition is presently classified as tax forfeited land; and WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood informed the County of Ramsey in 1971, that said Lot 1, Block 2, Hills and Dales Addition was and is being used for drainage ponding for the benefit of the public, to .wit : Easterly 129.5 ft more or less of Lot 1, Block 2, Hills and Dales Addition Ramsey County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood requests that the following area of Lot 1, Block 2, Hills and Dales Addition be utilized by said City for ponding and drainage purposes, to wit: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Maplewood hereby request that the County of Ramsey show a recommendation to the Commissioner of Revenue that said tax forfeited land be conveyed to the City of Maplewood for ponding and draining purposes. Specifically that part of Lot 1, Block 2, Hills and Dales Addition, said area legally described as follows: Easterly 129.5 ft more or less of Lot 1, Block 2, Hills and Dales Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota Issue a recommendation to the Commissioner of Revenue that said tax forfeited land be conveyed to the City of Maplewood for ponding and draining purposes. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 5. 1983 Annual Financial Report and Audit a. Manager Evans presented the staff report including the recommendation that the Council schedule a meeting with the auditors to discuss these reports. In the past, these meetings have been held in conjunction with the regular Council -Staff meeting on Thursdays. b. Councilmember Anderson moved to s chedule a meeting with the Auditors for June (, 1981. a t 5:00 P.M. in conjunction with t he staff /Council workshop session Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 6. Budget Transfer - Administration Intern a. Manager Evans presented the staff report with the recommendation that the Council approve a $3,530 budget transfer (from the Capital Outlay Budget for phones to the Temporary Employees Wages Budget) to finance the cost of an administrative intern. b. Councilmember Anderson moved t approve the $3,530 budget transfer from the Capitol Outlay Budget for phones to the Temporary Employee Wages to finance the cost of an administrative intern. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. _ 24 - 5/14 E R 7. Employees Option to Defer Severance Pay a. Manager Evans presented the staff report with the recommendation that Council adopt a resolution which would give employees the option of deferring all or part of their severance pay, without interest, when they terminate employment with the City. b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the follo resolution and moved its adoption: $4- 5 -74 WHEREAS, upon termination of employment, most City employees are eligible for severance pay; and WHEREAS, allowing employees to defer all or part of their severance pay, without interest, would be beneficial to both the City and its employees; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that: 1. All City employees, upon termination of employment, shall be given the option to defer all or part of their severance pay; 2. All deferred installments of severance pay shall be paid without interest; 3. All deferred installments of severance pay shall be paid in annual lump sum payments on the first payroll of each year; 4. The number of deferred annual installments shall be designated by the employee, but the maximum number allowed shall be limited to five; 5. Employees shall specify, upon termination of employment, the portion of his /her severance pay that is to be paid in each installment and these amounts may be adjusted upon written notice by former employees. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None-, K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Slopes a. Councilmember Maida questioned when the Planning Commission would be taking a "slope" tour. 2. Highwo o d Avenue a. Councilmember Maida commented on the water problems on Highwood Avenue. b. Staff will contact the resident having the problem. 3. Trailer Park a. Councilmember Anderson questioned when the mobile homes at Rolling Hills Park will be "tied down". b. Mayor Greavu stated he had talked with the developer and he is proceeding. 4. A.M.M. - 25 - 5/14 0 a. Councilmember Bastian stated the annual A.M.M. meeting will be Wednesday, May 30, 1984 at Brooklyn Park. The social hour is from 5:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M* 5. Chuck E. Cheese a. Mayor Greavu introduced the fo ll o wing resolu and moved its adoption: 84- 5 -75 WHEREAS, seven (7) years ago Chuck E. Cheese was born into the business - enter tainment, restaurant climate; WHEREAS, Chuck E. Cheese's Pizza Time Theatre opened in the City of Maplewood in June of 1982; and WHEREAS, Chuck E. Cheese has commissioned them to working with the Maplewood Community by making public appearances, sponsoring local teams and tournaments, hosting fund raisers and holding over five- hundred (500) free tours; and WHEREAS, Chuck E. Cheese's Fan Club Members, including corporate memberships now exceeds 12,000; NOW, THEREFORE MAYOR JOHN GREAVU AND THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD COUNCIL NlIl11IBERS do hereby declare Tuesday, May 22, 1984, as CHUCK E. CHEESE DAY. Seconded b:v Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - Mayor Greavu; Council- members .Anderson, Bastian, and Wasiluk. Nays - Councilmember Maida, L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Nature Center a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to proclaim May 19, 1984 as Maplewood Nature Center Day in honor of their Fifth Annivers Ac are planned f or the entire day. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 2. Police Budget a. Mayor Greavu moved to app a b udget t ransfer from the Contingency Account to the Police Budget to cover the cost of the 1984 Contract. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. Mayor Greavu moved to adjourn the pu blic meeting to reconvene in closed session. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. M. ADJOURNMENT 9:05 P.M. - 26 - City Clerk 5/l4 I . Tv9NUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 5:00 P.M., Thursday, May 24, 1984 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 84 -11 A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, I12innesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 5:00 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. B.. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present MaryLee Maida, Councilmember Present Michael T. Wasiluk, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None, D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the agenda as amended 1. Frost Avenue 2. Pearson's Mobile Dome Park 3. Slip around - Highway 694 and County Road D Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Bastian moved, seconded by Councilmember Anderson, Ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda Items 1 and 2 as recommended 1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses - check register dated May 16, 1984 and May 17, 1984 - $320,561.02: Part II - Payroll checks dated May 18, 1984 - $64, 293.32) in the amount of $384,854-34. 2. Pay Rate for Dragging of Diamonds Resolution No. 84 -5- NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the following pay rate maximum is hereby es- tablished for temporary employees retroactive to May 1, 1984: Softball field dragging and lining per person per field. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS None. - l - 5/24 G. AWARD OF BIDS None. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Approval of Purchase of Park Property a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Wasiluk moved to app rove the purchase agreement between the City and Independent School District .622. for the small parcel of property at the north end of the Hillside property adjacent to the Maplewood ball field in the vicinity of Holloway and North St. Paul Road. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. .byes - all. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. City Hall Replacement a. Manager Evans stated that Council has received copies of TKDA's report on the Ryan Building which indicated the improbability of using that as a unified City Hall. If Council still wants to proceed on having our facilities together, there is the possibility of arranging an installment purchase or a contract for deed purchase of a new building on our property. I have had very preliminary discussions with two firms (TKDA and Ellerbe) about the possibility of their erecting a structure to our specifications on the Public Works site - perhaps down nearer the pond. We would also review expansion of the present building, but that has several problems. We would then pay for it by some combination of down payment and subsequent yearly payments. The law on such financing requires some additional checking, and we might be limited to a five year period. However, if you would like to consider the above, I would probably make arrangements to have representatives of TKDA, Ellerbe or both give presentations. b. Council requested the meager to investigate further and obtain figures as to justify a new building, J. VISITOR"PRESENTATIONS None. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Trailer Court a. Councilmember Wasiluk stated he had toured the Rolling Hills Mobile Home Park and thought it was progressing satisfactorily. The owner, Mr. Dick Pearson, is having some problems with the tie downs because the ground isn't settled yet. b. No action taken. - 2 - 5/24 2 . Frost Avenue a. Councilmember Anderson questioned as to what has been heard regarding Frost Avenue, b. Director of Public Works Ken Haider stated he has been in contact with the County and State and plans are proceeding, L. ADMINISTR.A.TIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Slip around on Highway 694 and County Road D a. 'Director of Community Development reported on the proposal for a "slip around" on Highway 691 and County Road D. The-area property owners are enthusiastic but Minnesota DOT is negative. Further meetings are to be held. M. ADJOURNMENT 5:40 P.M. City Clerk 3 - 5/24 1 i ACCOUNTS _ PAYABLE JUNE 11 Page 1 { t ' 1984 CITY OF MAPLEVOCD CHECK REGISTER _ LHECK Nl. CATE - AMOUNT V�NDO "_ - ITEM DESCRIPT;JN f 137C4C 05/29/84 82 CLERK OF COURT CNT DRIVERS LIC 82„nC 137P69 G5/29/84 4 #INN STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LiC PE 137M69 05/29/84 4 MINN STATE TREASURER MOTOP VEH LIC PP. l Arm, 69 051219 f 4 610 FINN STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC PE 137M69 05/719/84 150040 MINN STATE TREASURER DFI V Em" S LICE*�—zE 9 1030n? 099 138M2C C5/2S/F4 4 ZC, C0.00 TR WASTE C CN TR #_ 0 SUR TAX PB L 138M2C 05129/84 204.130— M'.TRO WASTE CGNTR SUR TAX PBL f 2C •196e"UC - E 13Fk69 05/29/84 165.00 #65 DRI LIC PEL 165.00 138M 1 5/29/84 69866.62 P* ST TIREAS FERA PERA PBL 138v76 05/29184 99413.31 MN ST TRE.AS PERA PERA PBL 16,776.93 l � 138P10 fj5/29/P4 4 ?000 RAPSEY CNTY COURT ABULANCE RUNS 48.30 *. 139165 05/29/84 2000 JOHNSON LARRY SPEAKER 20000 - 139166 05/25/84 30000 ST PAUL. FOLIC= iPROFF TRAVEL TRAINING 30.0^ • Y L 139E64 05/29184 _. _ •000 * ^ EMFL BENEFIT CLMS INSURANCE 139!69 05129!84 5!132.94 MINN STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC PE 139M69 019/219/84 _ 251 .JO P IAA STATE TREASURER DRIVERS L ICE 1\CE 5 9383.94 �► a � - r- 142AO5 C5/29/84 338.25 AFSCME 2725 UKI CN DUES PEL ! } t t 1984 CITY OF MAFLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK NC. DATE AlfOUAT _t10CR _ _ T 'rr .TEr GESC- IPT_ - �._ 142AO5 05/29/84 10.64 AFSCML 2725 UNION DUES PBL 348 . 89 1 142C35 05/29/84 15,125.50 CITY CNTY CREDIT UN CREDIT UNIJN PE 15 * 125.50 t *.fit• T 1421 5 05/29!84 F �1 2,38 _ « IC WA DE FERRED CM t DE ca C r 142115 05/29/84 524.20 ICMA DEF RR_G CCM; c 2,912.91 14 2M 35 G5/29/84 313.75 F? BE NEF?T ASSN INSURANCE 313.75 142M52 65/29/84 14 MINN FEDERAL SAVINGS FWT PBL 14986C. +� 142M61 C5/29f84 410000 MN MUTUAL LIFE I INSURANCE 41t#.u�3 142Mb5 Li5/29f84 R•C58.C9 MM ST COMM 1REVENUE SyT FBL _ 8 t 142M69 C5/29/94 15.77 Ff l ST RETIREMENT DEFERRED COMP F 142M69 05/25ft4 343.LO MN STATE TREASURER MCTOR VEH LIC P 14 2M 69 C5/2S/94 343.00- P% STATE TREASURER PCT CR VE LIC F 142P!6'Q 05129/8 4 5 * 766.93 MN STATE TREASURER VICTOR Vc H LI L F 142M69 05/29f84 31 R.00 FN STATE TREASURER DNR LIC P8L 142M6'9 C5 12SIT4 343.00 to STATE TREASURER PCTCR VEV LIC F 142M69 0/29/84 9.23 !!N ST RETIRE'MFN1 DEF . CCM0 F 69452.93 * - 142M7C 05/29/84 W94. MR STATE TREAS S/S S/S PBL 142x70 05.!29184 4.278.17 M � STATE TREAS _S /S S/S PBL. E073.02 * 142W25 05/24/84 157.40 kISC DEPT REVENUE SWT PBL 157.40 .... -,�.. ... ...w.au wrr .r.s.���r.�•..r+w•s..►.-- ...r -- .. -.-i. . -.vim.. _.w..�r�,�,..:r- ..v- ..ww�s+ :•-. ..- •rc- +emu- r s.. _ .....en.r.. •.. s.-+x -..t.- .air..- .++'+� • .n. «,.r . ., w .. ..� �. .. _ . +v ._... 1984 CITY OF MAFLEU000 CHECK REGISTER CHECK NQ. DATE aMLUAT VENDED ITEM DESCRIP7i0N 143164 OS /29/84 ?5 o00 MEEHAN .MMES CANINE ALLOW -CE 35 900 � 1431069 05/29/84 5 *581 *94 f f STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LiC PB 143M69 OS/2Sr/�34 265.00 MN STATE TREASURER DPI WERS LT PAL 5.846.G4 144469 C5129l84 5 , C 76.24 MINN STATE TREASURER MCTOR VEH LIC 0 1B 144469 05/25184 369.50 FINN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC FqL 5 9445.74 # 145040 05/29/84 86.50 CLERK OF COURT CNTY DRIVERS LIC 86.50 145L17 C5/25/R4 99.88 LaBELLES FROG SUPPLIES- 145%!45 0:5/29134 PETRO AREA MGN ASSN TRAVEL TRAINING 145 05/29/84 5 MN STATE TREASURER MCTGR VEH LIC Pei 1451069 .5 /2SIE4 65.00 P� STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC FEL 5,356.25 mot,. f 145N71 05/2S/84 19312.21 ON S; TREAS SURTAX SUP TAX PPL 145 71 C5129/84 279-54— Ph ST TREAS SURTAX SUR TAX P6L 1,354.57 146N69 C5/29/84 5.064.20 NN ST 11REASURER MOTOR VEH LIC PBE 146M69 05/29/$4 239.00 MN ST TREASURER DRIVERS LIC PBL _ _ _ 5.303.20 1461096 " 05/29184 50000 MRSF TEA REG SQ.00 � V. rr•...,s._w +.....r�� -... r -.,. _.-.. .wr... -. s...•.. ., ..ter.... .► ..- _. - ..w... a .•.r. -... ... _.. -eta. .• ._ ..... p . � • -. .r • -.- _ . -. _ . 1984 CITY OF MAFLE�OCD CPECK REGISTER ` CHECK NO. DATE .. _ 4MOUN' -. V: NOOR ITEM DESCRIPTIO 146R2G C5129l84 73915 • RQZSKAZOFF DALE SUPPLIES 73.15 s. 15CA45 CS /31IP4 145.JQ A WE PLANNII INC ASSN MEMBcRSH TF 145.x}0 15CM 69 C5/31fF4 6 897. R7 MN ST TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC P' 15CM69 C:5 /31/84 263.^0 0� ST TREASURER MQTCR VEH LIC P: 71 7.160.97 151 0069 05131/34 8,1158969 WN STATE TREAS MOTOR VEH LIC P' 151M69 05/31/84 3?5.00 MN STATE TREAS MOTOR VEH LTC P; r 6 151M76 05/31194 6 MN STATE TREAS PERA PE PBL 151M76 05/31/84 9 PN STATE TREAS P6 PIRA PBL 169548.57 152167 Co5/31/84 3 KROISS RC?SRT ASSESSMV47 REF 152167 35/31/F4 477.88 KROISS RCBEFT ASSESSMENT REF 152C40 C5 /31Ia4 -- - - 63.50 CLERK CF COURT ChTY DRIVERS LIr 63.50 152M69 05/31/84 9 FINN STATE TREAS MOTOR VcH LIC P' 1521w69 LS/31/84 18600 t TRk STATE TREA DRIV LIC FRL 9031.75 1549441.94 FUN^ 01 TOTAL GENERAL 249496.60 FUND 92 TOTAL -_- PAYROLL BENEFIT -- _ I ,coo .Ot� FU'VO 94 TOTAL - DcNTAL SELF-INS( 179,938.54 TOTAL _ NECESSARY EXPENDITURES SINCE LAST COUNCIL - MEETING - F •as.. a✓MYIJ/�1 \C`�I�l.4YlZ 1 .+M•.I_il• i.•Vlws+rs •aMF�' - •v �l.I�Y1' /. wtrf 1M' '!� 'w� i w.uYw" �w'1�11�: AI'r1�... �.V•IR_'�IYUl1" Ry' . _ .. 4'• . Mb�t F'R'• s .. - f _ Y IY '.a. r! w•V� - •� � -••. . •• • . uww l i S 1984 CITY OF MAPLEWO* CHECK REGISTER c r Ck_CK N,;. CATS Ak3Ul�T R VE�DC: _ I DESCRIPT70". 163125 06/01/84 175 *CO CORPORATE RISK MANG CONTRACT PYM 175.00 163135 - 61011134 __._ -5.19 MILLERS FAM ILY MEAT SUPPLIES - 5.19 1b316 st �6l..1I�4 7 6 .4�J ANC PAG "R ADV AGE G S_ V PAGING SE.PV 163168 06/01/S4 27 *OCR AOVAVf - `E - J "'AGING SERV PAGING SERV 94,4E 163170 06/C1 /84 E7 AL61NS0N SUPPLIES _ E 3 # 16317'1 �6/�1184 2Q3.EC� A"ER 'INS SERV GRCUP SUPPLIES - _ 200.0^ _ 163172 6l�1 f14 77' ?, 5 AOL,A ROL INC SUPPLIES _ 77E *75 - 16 317 3 L6/L1184 14.1:3 14. BENASSI PARBAPA REFVJD w 16 174 -6 C L6/.,1I84 3 C 2�. 5 A F FV� U SE r _C_ M-PA R Md ! T tiEF I I 23.95 - 163175 06 /Cl /04 75.00 ENG N RECIRD MEMBERSH k 163176 6ln1 /8 4 1 0.00; F RE MARSHALS MEMBLRSH IP - 1631 0 6/::1 / 8 9.30 FR ANT ZE N MICHAEL E. RF U h0 9.0 1631 /8 C6 /CI /84 32 *0 _ FRICN LINDA REF LN0 - 163118 J6 /C1 /84 15 *00 FRICM LINDA REFUtiD - 163179 06/01/84 332.00 FIRST SECURITY TITLE ASSESSEMENT REF 332,0!' : 00 - - - - -- }ARTF CRD I11S GR CUQ SUPPLIES 240.00 E` - _ - _ - 1631 81 U 6 /G 1 / 84 1 Qv. Or _ .. H^LMES TIMOTHY REC 1969 REF UNID 100.00 # 163122 _ - - 06 /� 1 /84 - 75. ^0 JAROMBEK LEE REFUND r 75.00 t-A E..:. 1984 CITY OF FAF LE. 6O CD C!- ECK REGTSTER CHECK DATE aMOVN Ir I7E"M DESC R IPT +Oh r' - 163183 06/01/84 7. L;0 KOEMPTGEN PATRICIA REFU�iD _ _ 7,?10 t r 163184 r6/Cl/84 4,550.00 WASY CO SUPPLIES 4, f,5 00 163185 06/01/84 7.00 MCCONVILLE AUDREY A=F LND . 163186 06/01/84 35..:3 MEEHAN JAM7- S CAN :NE R.ETA NER - - . _ 30 5.0 0 163187 ij6 /C1 18 4 339 wN TORO I%C R:PA1R MA IhT 339.57 16318 IF 06/1:1 /1.4 2 NUPICIPAL CCD- ME ORC 2, o R4 * 1631 SQ 06/01/84 ..2 ..,� _ J RTrHAF KITHRYN _ 7 R EFUND :. -. 32.JC * 163190 06/01 /84 P7.R5 FUFFR IDGE JOHAS0. SUPPLA. g7 . g S 1631 91 U6 /%1 /84 ?2.0 " �AL£R PAT REF L"0 - 32 ; 163192 C6 /.C1 /A4 32.42 WL Y BPANCH W ATERSHED R *_'PA:R MAINT - - 32o42 t 163A j2 U6/01 /84 11).u7 ACRO- MTNN SUPPLIES 163AU2 C6/Cl S,DO ACRD -MINK SUPPLIES 163A C2 C6 /C 1 /F4 _ 39,73 ACRE - M TNN SOUPPLTES � b 7 . � C •� 1631-75 36/01 /84 33,39 AT 8 T TELE.PHO-NE 163A 75 06 /C1 l84 g.04 AT S T TELEPHONE 163A 75 06/01/84 4.00 AT 9 T TELEPHONE ;•.. 163A75 06/01/84 108995 AT b T TELEPNCP.E 1631- 75 06/31 /$4 _ - -- - 3.10 AT b T TELEP�!ONE ( - 163A75 06/01/84 12,0 AT b T TELEPHONE 163A75 06/01/84 8.00 AT b T TELEPHONE 163A75 106!0'1 /B 4 AT 8 T TEE LE'PHON ;s 163A 75 06 /C1 /84 224.16 AT & T TELEPHONE 163A75 06101184 118.'R0 AT T TELEPHONE 1631-75 0b/`1 !84 - -.. _. _4 . 00 AT 8 T TELEPHONE 163A75 061Q1 /84 12.00 AT S T TELEPHONE 1t�4 16 3 415 061C11B4 8.00 AT & T TELEPHONE - 16305 191.54 _ . _.- AT 9 T TELEPPON 'rF J _ 163A75 C6/01184 4F•96 AT i T TELEPHONE P � 7 1984 CITY OF MAFLEWC^0 CHECK REGIST} R � r CN�CK h,.. CATS E A fllU 1 VT ND C' _ TTE M OCSCP IP T: r 163,75 1316 /CiI84 34.56 AT S T TELEPHONE i - 163A75 06/01/84 4.2 AT b T TELEPHONE. 163A75 .6 /C1 /84 24. - 20 AT 9 T TELEf- H0NE 163A75 06/01 /84 25945 AT $ T TELLPNC��E 163A 75 ; 6 /d1 /84 -� 4. 1 ,� AT & T TEL E P HON 163A75 06 /C1 /84 51 „04 AT 8 T TELEPHOwE 1b3A75 6 /C1 /84.�'Q AT 8 T TELEPNC ► 163A75 06/[1/84 4.Ctn_ AT 9 T TEL LF�±OtiE - - 163A75 U6 /D1 /8 4 40-- AT 8 T TcLEPHOlj . 163A 75 06/L1 /84 400 AT 8 T TZLEPHONt 163A75 = 6 /C1 /84 4.00 AT 8 T T�LtP��3'w�' 163A 75 :6/D1/84 10.4D AT 9 T TEL"THC%%. 983. ?9 163A92 / 6 C 1IF4 270 AUTOCOM TNOUSTRI SUPPLIES 270*Q 16 3 R45 � �, 6/C1/84 27. F^ BOARD 9F MATER COMM UTILITIES 163345 06/Cl/84 6.48 ?CARC OF i AT =R COMM UTj LIT IE.S 163P�45 C6lC�1 l8 t - 12.12 g CaPC CF WATER CCMN UTI LITIE S � 163c45 66/Cl/E4 12912 BOARD OF WATER COMM UTILI TIE S FYM 163.945 L6/Cl/84 328.6 BCAR0 OF WATER COMM ;G1�iTRACT _. 16 3P45 C % 6 r 4 33 .74 BrAR, CF WATrR COMM CC lTRACT FYM 163x45 C / 1 /R4 36.39 9 ARD OF MATER COO M M CCNTRACT FYI! 456.51 'i63R4 C6 /Ci /84 RO YE TRUCK PARTS REPAIR M�1INT V� 10.01 163952 061131 /84 4R60 0 RRZSS4fli— KEN NEOY SLPPL /ES 1b?C55 C6 /0184 18 * 16 tCrY DUPLTCA1I14G DUPLICAT =;yG 189.16 163056 06%01/R4 49 COLLINS ELF CTRIC LIES REP�'-P }iR N4IhT 163C 56 C6101/84 6 ^.58 CCLLINS ELECTRIC -- - - _ 11C. e16 163058 06/01/84 13.96 CCFY EGUIPMENT INC SUPPLIES 13.96 i J rwra�ll.. -. .. _.- '.7nr ..aa .w...+ -s. .mow M+rt ..s...s•.. r1+ v- r.. h`....+.-+ v ^ti.". JSar.•.Iw�+^.Mt'1'vIaAV. aw.' .r ..I.. .... .r_ .".. !. ... . . - s. ^ '. w ... .� • V 1984 CITY OF M!AFLEU0r%.D CHECK PEGTST'R CHECK N J. CAT' AMOUNT VFNOOR TTEM DESCPIPTI JW S f 163C90 16 /il / 22 .h4 COLNTRY CLUB SLPPLTES 22.64 { ttttt� 163'`30 U6/011 R4 11.32 O�tco SUPPLIES 11,32 � �ftttf 163045 06/C1/84 12.CC C?SPATCH PAP ERG 12 *30 * *ftti 163 U - /L•1 /.:4 89.64 D'_ S7 -'n SALES SUPPLI f9.64 - 163 :6/31184 2 El .05 ERESSER TWC SUPPLIES 5 # f 16 0 L6 /C1 /84 2250, E BARRY V _H ALLG Wi- "jC 225900 163F 5 C6/01/84 30.'50 FALST DANTEL TRAVEL TRAIN "NG 163G45 u6/01184 6.50 GOODYEAR TIRE CC RE PAIR MAINT VLi- 163G45 06 /Cl f 53.36 G0C0YE'AR TIRE C C REPA'R MA T VFF 163G45 �6/01I84 126.14 GOODYEAR TIRE CC REPAIR MA INT %Er 226. ^C 163H14 06/01/84 F3. t -ALWEG KEVIN R UNIFORMS 83.E'4 1631J15 06/01/84 8 HAIDEp KE 4NET G CS OFF. CE SUPPL &- { 163H36 06/01/94 10. 1 !0— 'HILLCREST ANIMAL HIS REPAIR MAINT 1634-;36 06/01/84 100FO HILLCREST ANIMAL HOS REPAIR PAINT :._ . 163H36 - -- _ _._..06/C1/84 - - 10. R^ _ HTLLCREST ANIMAL HOS ANIMAL C ARE � 163H36 06 /P1/t:4 77 HILLCREEST ANIMAL HOS ANIMAL CARE i ! 11 �wr�a . rem+ r.w.s+.v►•..a. . rr..+w+r..arr.+r.wr+rws�sr �+ •.. .:- awa�rsr•w►ww�••.•+�• w -wr•. .e. ..�. --.,w •., :. ...a r :r...w. +. ,.. s .. t 1984 CTTY OF PAFLEWO CHECK RLGIST=R CHECK 1�'�. OkTc A.MOtli�? 11EN00» ITEM! OESC ?I?'iC r :, 87.80 163Hb0 i6/G1184 38000 PCtjDtY FU.L OIL ( 163J35 Cj6 /C1 /F4 96,44 JIB! HATCH SALES SUPPLIES 96.44 +� _ 1b3J50 .,, � b /'"1 / 4 41 °.50 J THOMAS ATHLLCT CS SUPPLIES PKC u 153J5C f � �6/L1/84 650.25 J TNCMAS ATH�ECTsCS SUPPLIES FRCC 163J50 0 06/ 7 1/R4 332. °?C J TNvMAS A THLECTICS SUP PL IES PR'?C 163J50 C,61017F4 17R.20 J THOMAS ATHLECTICS SUPPLIES FRO 19587.95 163K55 �.6l�1I 4 77.56 K "ICY, LUMB SUPPLIES 77.56 163L28 .,blC1 /R4 ?5.i0 LANG RZCHARO CAN+fxi E ALLO�i %f 35 0C 163L75 J6/�1l84 14Q.24 L^NG LK TR ACTOR SUPPLIES 14Q 163L86 .6fCl /R4 164.45 LUKIN STEVEN SUPPLIES 164.45 163*1 1 u- 06 01 /84 332970 MAC OJEEN FOUIPMENT REPAIR MAIM'' Vi ' 163'x I 1 C.6 /u1 /84 12.10 PAC W n . . W E h EQUIPWENT R E P A I R MA INT W - - 163M,11 - U6/:.1/84 74.93 PAC QJVEN EQUIPMENT REPAIR MAIhT - 419.73 163M14 06/01184 92.20 MAPLE 33000 REVIE61 - PUR LI SHIN C - � 92.20 �- i.• 163M46 06101/P4 35 .00 METTLER DANIEL CANINE RETA'. k'Ef 1984 CITY O MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK N ^. DATE AM OU NT YENOO: lTEI' flcSCuIP ?:r .0 163M55 06/01/84 36.45 MINN MINING CO SUP PL'E� - 36.4 5 163459 06/01 1 71.92 MTNNrIOTA BL. UEPRIN SUPPLIES 71.82 - 163""90 �i6>/01/84 3.194.:0 MOTOROLA INC SUPPLIEc 163M90 L6/Z'1184 5 P1 TOR CLA INC SUPPLIES 163V90 6/1 /.14 52,58 VOTORCLA INC SUPPLIES 163M9C 06/01 /R 4 4;-. F. MOTOR CLA NC SUPPLIES 894P6.36 163N95 �� ::6/x'1 /%1 15.00 MR�4 PRO SUPPLIE c . - - - _ _. 163N'30 C6/ /R4 53* 10 NC TH ST DAUL CITY UTILITIE S 163%30 06/01/ '94 1 N :TH ST 'AUL CITY UTILITIE'S 1 63N50 U6 /C1 /R4 3 7,39 NnRTHWESTIRN BELL TELEPHONE 1631459 L6 /UI /8 4 49. Qp AOFTHWEST;RA BELL TEL _ 163N50 C-6/01/84 33.87 - ._ h CF THWEST _R t EELL TELEPHCNr- 163N50 06/01/84 '761."8 NORTHAEST:RN BELL TELEPHONE 163"4 50 h6/L1184 16.98 hCRTHWEST`RA EELS TELEPHONE 163K50 06/01/8 4.67 hfFTHKESTERN EELL TELEPHONE 163!50 "6/01/84 62.97 NORTHWEST! RN HELL T LEPHONE 163N50 06/01/84 34.97 N FTHWESTkRN BELL TELEPHONE ,. 163N50 -. 0b/C1/84 _. -- 4! *18 . hCFTH�iESTERh BELL TELEPH 0 'N� 163150 06/01/84 68.54 i`0RT�- WESTERN EELL TELEPHONE 163N50 L6/C1/!!4 51 e D0 %'_?FcTHWEST:RN BELL TELEPHONiE 14i - - 163 %,50 06/0/84 - - - - - 38,90 - KORTHWESTERh BELL TELEPHONE 163k5i- 06/01/84 23.30 hCRTHWESTERN EELL TELEPHONE 163 06/91/84 ?R . °E %0F%TH WEST "R N BELL TE.LEPN ON 963 N 50 - - -- sj6 /C# /g4 - - 96,35 - ._. - NORTHWF -STE R A 9 =LL TELEPHON- r 163N50 06/01/84 15.58 AOFTHWESTERN EELL TELEPHONE 16300 06/01/84 22.45 _. N0RTHidEST"RN P.ELL TELEPHONE 163% i 6/01/R4 26. ^4 N` BELL TELEPHONE 1631,50 0'6/01/84 1.322.41 %O,RTHWESTERN EELL TELEPHONE r,. 163t�5L� r .b /01 /$4 9 35. .J1 A M T" Rh OrTH ES _ P_L PE LL TELEPHONE _,� - - -- 163 "�50 C6/01184 19o50 __ NOrcTtiaESTE - RN BELL TELEPHONT '_• 163N50 Q6/01/84 39.00 NORTHWESTERN BELL T�:LEi'H014=' 1984 C?TY OF MAFLE6CCO CHECK REGISTER t E r *+ CH ALK � _. a T D � a M0 %T U VE N OR D EM DES .it'TQN 1 r '' 16300 C6 /01 /84 38.90 NORTHWESTrRN Br'LL TELEPHON_ 16� *'S0 f�6/01 /R4 TC.73 tiCRTHWESTrRN BELL TELEPHONE. 163N 5C U 6/01 / F4 13- 'q' FTHW£ST =R A P ELL TELEPHONE X63 ':5 E6/C1184 49 I�CIFTHWESTF.Rh P =LL TELL, 163N50 x:6/01 /84 A 49, f0 - NOFTHWEST_Rh PELL C R T_I.�PHC �_ 163 *450 06/01 /84 49.p0 NIRTHWESTTRK BELL TELEPHCN 1.6'3 50� L6 /G1r84 49 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPv0 %E 1638.50 06/01/84 47,30 NOFTHWESTFRk BELL TEL_PHCN= 16 3 50 ' 6/1:1 /R4 49. *-CRT64WESTIRN BELL TELEPHONE 163%50 16fCl 49 Ra N0PTHW_ST P =LL TELEPH0NI 16 3 5 C 6 /C1 /P 4 105.22 r C FTHWrST =R A QrLL. TELEPHONE 163%'50 06/01/84 17.18 NCFTH oEST='RN PELL TELEP 1631J50 : 6/C1 /Q4 67.95 %VRTHYESTrR R BELL TELEPHONE 153�.50 0b /C1Ip4 12.02 NCFTHWESTE.RA BELL TELEP�CNE '163N50 C6/01I84 89,U5 W ^FT'H #4 EST' aELL TELEPHONE 3.931.06 163! 80 06/x"1/84 155.13 !►.E.P. UTILITIES + 1631180 %.6/01/84 Ff3.63 tt.S.fl. UTILITIES 163N b 6/11/84 9.23 %r-w.la. UTI LTTI"S 163A62 r6 /C1/84 2.40 Q.S.P. UTILITIES 163tr8C! +:+61^1 /Q4 3.53 N• S.P. U TI LT TT= c 163N80 6 1 /R4 2.40 N. S.P. UTILITIES �4 .. 163 8D 6/;:1184 2.40 A * sop . UT LITIES 163 *.8;j 16/C1 /P4 2.4C R. Zoo . UTILITIES 163 "1 C :.6/C1/ 2 k.S :a. UT 'IL Ti'cS 163 \ 61rl/84 2.40 k0SoPa l#T;I:TIES 163%80 26/01/84 3.53 #.S.P• UTILITIES 163 "';tO 06/"1/84 177.nC NO SOP* UTILITIES 163N8O 06/x.1 r 4 419 * 76 A• C.P UTILITIES 163 *:0 L6 /L1 /R4 12 '?.65 N• SOP . UTI LITIES 163 06/C1 084 85.65 N.S.P. UTILITIES 163 "480 "�6 /r'1 /F4 111.31 N.S.p0 UTILITIES 163N80 CL6lL1I84 __. __ _ _._ b * 0 , 09.09 *.5. . - UTI LITIES 163 %80 C6/C1/84 34,26 11 O'S .P. UTILITI S 163`480 r�'6/Cl /84 111.97 h S.p. UTILITIES •. 1b3 , � 80 ub /71 /84 - - - _ 41 .1 7 4 11....P. UT! S R 163!:81. C6 1C1 /F4 a9.lp 1 P. UTILITI:.c 163 ► 80 �� „6/C1/84 Q 94.2.. N.... UTILITIES 1b3sR0 E6 /C1 /R4 113. '74 N.S.P. UTILITIES 163 ! RC C61rl /84 PQ.45 t S.P. LTI LI TIES 163h80 C6/G1 /84 74. ?2 No 1.0P. - UTILITIES 163 "'80 06/01/84 - 4.25 N.S.P. UTILITIES 163N8C G6 /0 413.47 N.S.P. UTILITIES 163N81 [6 1C1 /P4 39.47 t•S•P• _ UTILITIEG 16 0 06/0 1/94 - 132.47 N.S.P. UTILITIES 163N30 06/0/84 37.31 N.S.P. UTILITIES 163NFO C6 /C1 /E4 78.17 N. S.P. t:�'ILITIES 163%80 ^6/01/$4 - 45.85 _.__.... N.C.P. UTILITIES 163PJ80 06/C1/84 15. N•S.P• UTILITIE'S 163 %J 80 C6/C11.84 11.92 N.S.P. UTILITIES - 163N E0 a.6 /C1 /P4 _ 7.75 f. SOP - -- - UTI L ?TIES 163M,80 06/01 /R 4 6.05 S �•.P. U TILITIES - _� 1984 CITY OF MAFI =W109 CHECK REGIST "R A�. DATE GUAT vr- OZ ITEM DESCPIPTTC 163.;!�fl ? v6!„1 / 4 2.52 �' 1�.�.P. UTILITIES .: 163P)80 56/01/84 4 *25 A• SwQ. UTI LITIES y . 163 8 1 Cb /C1 /84 4.25 - f .S.P. UTI LITIES 163"~80 C6/01fF4 6.7 5 1K. S.P. UTI LT 'rIE S 163NbO C6 /O1 /84 47.97 A. S.P. UTI LITIE 163N!C 06/C1/84 31 •'1 t. Sop UTTLTT 163 M80 06/011034 111.38 A.S.P. UT +LITIES 163N8G ^6/01/ ?4 197,28i.S.P. UTILITIES 1b3�,�9 gbl:i1/ 4 35,x,4 hoS.r. UTILITIES 1631\89 6/C1 /84 4 ^6.97 N *S.p. UTILITIES 16 1 fl 80 06/£1/ ?4 249,3.6 14 .5. UTLl LITI S 16 3"16 0 06/01/84 .. 79.14 % *SOO* UTILITIES 163A1 C C:6/C1/ ?4 197,17 .5.p. U'TILITIE'S 1631'89 J6/01/R4 8,51 1k.S.a. U TILITIES 163 :�/C1184 145.94 A.S.p. UT.lI7IES C6/01184 213 A . S.P! U3'I LITIE% 163ti3L 06/01 /84 89.76 f 0 S.�'• UTILITIES 1b3'�SC C6 / /Q4 12 1\.S.?. UTILITIES 1b3 "�89 0 6/"l /84 62 *03 11. Soo S, UTI LTTI'- S _- 1631\30'6 /C1 /84 212.89 � 1!. �.P. UTILITIES - -- .� 1b3-:gC 6/C1l�4 '16.42 h. �.. • SOP UTI LT TI E S '. 163N80 G6 /C1 !a4 60.30 h0 S•°. UTI LITIE S 163N80 U6/91/R4 172.3? N.S.F s U?ILA. 3 11 163940 C6/C1/�4 6614.Ci CLE D01 #ItiTCN PR.US�! F_PAT i NA I1\T VS 666.03 1.63 L6/Cl/F4 - FHCTOS TO GO SUPPLIES 163F40 C6/C1 6.45 F -CT ^S TC GO SLPPL3ES 163P40 06/ ^1 PR 15915 FH ^TOS TO GO SUPPLIES - _26.55 163 96/01/14 74.30 FITNEY BOWES CONTRACT PYM ._ 74.00 : :4't 163Q04 06%91 /8 - -- ._ _ . - .64.90 - - - -- RaCtO SHaCK SUPPLT ES 64.Q0 ;- 163R(3 06/01/84 10.19 RaJ►S_ r COUNTY CCNTRACT FYM - .._ _ 1 163P25 06/0f84 10028 AEO OWL COUNTRY STP SL:PPLIES �..n.w.rwweaaa.r r..rsi..+. ,....v......- .•.�.m ...��...... -. w•._ .. . e.- ....n•..r..o...- _.......,.... -�.sr ., .; _.. :. ..r ... ,.. -. .. .... _ ...a -� .. _.. - ,._. .. T � i i 1984 CTTY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CFrCK tor. CATE AMOUlk 7 vE D � ITEM CESC, -TP7!t 1 0.2E t 1638 7 L6/„1 4 .,, 9 50 R�FL__CTO PRODU,.TS ..UPPiIES 38.5 f fy 163839 � fi 06/11 ._ 4 �t 8. _ _: r G Rlrf -A, LS c p �"c ..UP. L E $ • '� 8 t t #fttt 1b3SL2 C6/ ^1/84 158.p6 3 8 n LCCK 8 SAFE SUPPLIES 158.86 16355 06/01/84 45.54 .. g T CFF �CE CFF ICS Sl.. PL �. ` 163S;;5 �;6/a1/A4 22.36 S 9 T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLI =. 163SO5 06!01/84 3.?0 S 8 T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPL I E. _ 163�.r 5 G6/i�11F4 66.1 ? S $ T OFFICE CFF TCE SLr-PL :` "-; 163S05 06/ 14.69 S 8 T OFF SCE . OFF i CE SU'FL IE: 1635.35 06/01/84 6.72— c 8 r OFFICE OFFICE SUrPLi". 163505 C6 /^1184 F2.34 S 9 T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPL iE: 1h3S 5 :bl;�11A 4 43.';O S T CFF `CE CFF ICE SL' I -c : 163SC5 Lb /C119 4 16.34 OFFICE OFF ICE SU = Pi.:'. 163SCU5 C6 /01 /R4 29.10 S 8 T OFFTCr OFFICE SUPPLI - 163 0 , , ft 05 06IC1IF4 307- S B T OFFICE CFFICE SLr-PLI*` 163S75 C6/C1/84 212o9n, S T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES } 531.63 ,- _ ..__. __..1b3�3G -_.___ 06/0►1 /84 14.99 SEARS #8412 SUPPLIES t 163530 r6 /G1 /g4 22.36 SEARS #8412 SUPPLIES 163 S 30 L6 /C1 /84 99995 SEARS #8412 SUPPLIES 1635 3C ib /C1 /84 94.97 Sr SRS #841 2 SUPPLIES 232.27 t s.f 163558 L6 /C! /84 209.45 ST PAUL CITY CF REPAIR NA ItJ -- 163S58 - C6 /L1 /14 24, 50 ST PAUL CITY OF REP A: °, MA INT 163558 L6101/84 13000 ST PAUL CITY OF FccPAIR MAINT �•: -, 246.45 + • c 163S70 x6/01 /R4 79. ?6 STANDARD SPG ALIGN SUPPLIES 79.76 r � -> 163582 � 06/01/84 159347.21 STAT_ r OF MN DOT _ES �UPPL ' ... ,,F,.,..�....._,..... .........,.....,.,., ... ,.._.,_.- ....... ....... „ ....,....... �.,., . I __ .. - -.. ....,...>..r ......tea.- .�.. -.,�„ r _... _, -.... f ' � 1984 C17 OF MAPL76CC0 CHECK REGIST7R CHECK NOe DATE AMOUNT VFNDO? 'TES! DESCPIPTION.. 159347.21 < 163SP4 06/01/84 35.00 STEF'�''N SCOTT CANINE i' E A►LLOWnNCE - -- - 35000 163729 C6 1 184 2 03 4960 T. a.S C41F.'KY S"NS P A ?R MAINT 2, ) 163T8C X6/0 1184 1 io175 *00 TRUCK UTILITIES MFG c.QUi°MENT 1 9 1 75.00 1+63T97 C6/01/84 14,1 b TWIN CITY FILTER FILTERS CLEAN 1!53T9? ::6/C1184 43.75 TWIN CITY FILTER SUP PLIES 57.91 163U77 f6/?1/84 ?6.C'Q UNIT =D BUSINESS MICR SUPPLIES - 86 163US6 23. 'P 0 UfqIVERSAL MEDICAL 0XY GE. N s -_ 23. FO :ter *�• 163V47 - r- 6/C1/84 - 2.155:15 VIKING TNO CENTER SUPPLIES 163V47 C6 /C1 /84 96.10 VIKING IND CENTER SUPPLIES 2,251 .25 1630 5 L6 /r11 g4 131 .Rfl #AALDON PUMP SUPPLIES ` 13 1 • R 0 ,� 1b3W21 �� C6 /L1 /R4 7.99 WARN =RS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES - 163i?1 06/01184 21.29 WARAERS TRUE VALU SUFPLIES 5� 1631 21 C6 / - 1/84 8.16 YAPN''PS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES i 163W21 061"1184 22.43 MARK RS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES «..._ _.. 1b3u21 - 06/01/84 _ 26.E+5 - -- WAPNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES ' 163W21 06/01/84 70.15 MAFArF TRUE VALU SUPPL 157.17 1 163W22 C6 /^1 UP E6e44 WARNER IND SUPLY SUPPLIES iwawiwsw � ►.�s :..o_�►•:n�w. f- a+... +.r•swa..wra. s.�wuwr.a :.s weaw. sar�• -+w�w +.macaw_ :. ww...w.vrr�... ..� w- .. rc.r... .ra.Y. w ..ra. -�s o i. _..... -+ . � 1984 CITY OF MAFLEU3CO CF-ECK FEOISTER CH E CK N . • DATE _ AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM UE�C? IP T.: fir, 163w22 ? �6rc1 4 E6944 4ARK!:R IND SUPLY SUPPLIES 163W22 06/01184 86.44— WARNER IND SUPLY SUPPLIES :• _._ _ 86944 1636 06 /r'1 /84 5.00 w�52LU c M /KE TRAVEL TR:�IN KG 5.00 - 163W50 ,6/ :1184 2 l300.?'3 W- 9 ?E'R— TRCS -TH IhC SUPPLIES. 2 *00 163W55 16; 6/C118 17099 6-ALTER "AROLD SUPPLIES 17.99 1636-65 ,6/01/14 11 .73 WH.TE BEAR OFFICE. OFF.0 SLFPL iCS 11.?'3 - 163W70 6IC11 4 80000 iI F? =LD P'TCN -LL CC' TRACT FYM 163'170511./34 420► .0 l� WTNF�LD ITCH-LL CCNTRhCT PYM 163W70 1b /C1 /�3 b 3st 0.00 i jh'F .LD M ITC TELL Cv T cACT rYNI _ tg 173 ,02 06/01/ 39.73 ACRD - M.NN SUPPLIES 173A 2 0b1 'ir84 39.73— ACRa —MINK SLPPL'ES ;;..... _. 44041o62 FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL 2.297.90 FUNP 03 TOTAL 14YD NT Cf-A4 GE c� 15 t3 47.21 FUND 12 TOTAL STREET C ONST R S1 : -- - -- - -- - � 33. 4 FUND 35 TOTAL �3 -16 MA F L EW C pF 42000 FUND 4 TCTAL 78 -10 HILLWOCC t - _ 38000 FUND 50 TOTAL 7R -24 BEAU A V/ W• 1 9 FUNO 65 TOTAL 81 -12 MOLLOW A Y -' 36.39 FUND 66 TOTAL 81 -13 CAR.SGP frtiE y ' 1 9886.56 FUNC 9^ TCTAL SAN ITARY SEWED F 14.- - - -- - - - -- _— - ' __ . _ 3 9 293.�?7 ... FUND 96 TOTAL VEHTCLE 8 EQUIP 68 9646.63 TCTAL ;-4 � INDICATES ITEMS FINANCED BY RECREATIONAL FEES S j �1/I�NIIrY/i. Vi�Y4� CITY of MAPLEWOOD 2 4 s 6 - e 9 10 12 14 15 r.yy�1I�1.11�M Mr.Y�. \ti M►��MIi. A�11\.M Wr'�i.�M�-.Y .� "�.�i`S � M►MY�MM.�M PAYROLL. "CHECKS • vM✓t�MV.++• a�M�.1NM/.M... REGISTER ti..M�/I.�_.iWM A.M�YM���AiAiw w.MY N� �� Aw�M.�...• . .• M Sri► CYCLE B010 CHECK DATE 06 - 01.84 II�YI�Y PERIOD EACIkG C5 -m25.84 PAGE 1 OEP To- NC EMPLwNO EMPLOYEE NAME CHECK•HO AMOUKT r ._ T.__.... .. 16 17 0012 361.2' to s 00�2 1 469501 _ 7- Au $r DANIEL �. ��.... F 0529,40009 �.� f _ o-3s*47 r._.��.�� ..- �... � - ._..�.._....�..� 2° 21 . -.00? 5 7 . a4 22 0034 4 474097528 S STOTTLEMYER . . EDITH 0002 484369671 eEHM LOIS N 0529- m00001 459.00 t 2 3 r ._ T.__.... .. 2062 _ __ ..... .— ._.._.. .� _. 1�AHS ___ ,- - _. �_a �_� x . w �....... �.. s. C.L� 3'� -0 _ 4 D 478.07 0002 1 24 200.61 1 x.695 .42 6 �4ATHEYS ALANA � K 0529- 0001 543.52 A- 0010 4736644 74 KAHN DAVID J 0529 -00003 120.29 t 0010 473900147 %JOHNSON GREGORY R 0529.00OC4 ow"G. t X 1 ' 001 4695865 _ _._5! AN_S ON*!•� � - ,..._LTL _.. __�. ....... .. _ .Q U r....�.. 4 9105 7 A 052 9 -00013 464.88 t 389• lb 1; 0010 0022 . 611 * '' ._..�.,...�_.�.._ 0012 -� � ---3- 57340166. _CU0£ .. -_LARRY _......__�... _ J_ _0529w00006 -_ - -- ! -T 5 -9 fl___._ !1 0012 470520124 DOHERTY KATHLEEN M 0529 -000CT 81.74 I1 a0 2 4 7t 40 0 �. $ _.. R� .: _- _ � ._ _ �.��.::�.:.�. _ _x. 3.9.4 0031 16 17 0012 361.2' to s 00�2 1 469501 _ 7- Au $r DANIEL �. ��.... F 0529,40009 �.� f _ o-3s*47 r._.��.�� ..- �... � - ._..�.._....�..� 2° 21 . -.00? 5 7 . a4 22 0034 4 474097528 S STOTTLEMYER . . EDITH 6 0 0529 -00021 0 1 35 0033 477288389 N 23 PHYLLIS 0022 469200614 i-AGEN ARLTNE J 0529.00010 478.07 t 1 24 200.61 0022 390444446 �4ATHEYS ALANA � K 0529- 0001 543.52 A- 25 0033 0022 CHAD t'!OELLER MARGARETT A 052.9"00012 0000 t X f 126 27 ._L���AI�I�...���_..0�����4_Q�� 0022 47332 7550 ""11 GNA L OELO RE S A 052 9 -00013 464.88 t 389• lb 28 2S1 0022 . 471502356 .... - - _ _.. _R I CH I E . __ .. � _. _. _� . _ __ _ - _.. C A 0 __ _ ._._ __ . 19486o47 0 2 .. Q O. .. 6 .._ � �_.� .__ ..... 3 7 9 3 7 30 0031 4713221 98 P UREL I U_ S LUCI LLE ._._.�_.0 _r_..BETTY,.. E 0529-00014 845.92 31 0031 i?'42b481 b SELrV4b _ 052900015 _ 520.61 32 33 - 0 3 3t3 i 34 0034 4 474097528 S STOTTLEMYER . . EDITH 6 0 0529 -00021 0 1 35 0033 477288389 GREEN PHYLLIS C 0 529.00016 577 t 1 36 0033 472244994 HENSLEY PATRICIA A 0529 -00017 200.61 37 0033 476620547 - KELSEY CONN IE L 0529.00418. 1 67.02 - 1 0033 476269815 CHAD JOANNE L 0529.00019 19508 t 1 39 0 4 68.36443 � L ET-O R y� �..__._. ._L���AI�I�...���_..0�����4_Q�� sO 0 �!�►��� �t 1 r' 40 40 1 0033 E 0 052 9- 00025 3 389• lb 1 X584.48 • 42 0034 4 474097528 S STOTTLEMYER . . EDITH 6 0 0529 -00021 0 0.00 t t x 1 �w 46 6 ! 4 ' 0 0041 1 184440036 E EASTYR D DEBORAH A A 0 0529 -00022 3 358.17 A 0 0041 4 468461717 C COLLIN'S K KENN ETH V V 0 0 70 , ,e 4 49 0 0041 4 475323183 N NELS0N R ROBERT 0 0 0 0529 -00024 6 649.91 t t � sO 0 0041 4 477227636 O OMATH J JnY E E 0 052 9- 00025 3 389• lb s 1 . . 471502356 .... - - _ _.. _R I CH I E . __ .. � _. _. _� . _ __ _ - _.. C A 0 __ _ ._._ __ . ._ .__ 0 0 2 .. Q O. .. 6 .._ � �_.� .__ ..... 3 7 9 3 7 55 56 67 f +� CrTY f1F MAPLE6000 PAY2CLd- CHECKS REGZStER CYCL 0010 CHECK DATE d6 -01 -84 PrRI00 EACING f C5 -25.84 PAtt 2 DEPT-NO EMvL -NO EMPLOYEE NAME CHECK-NO AMOUNT CLEARED + 3 i _ 9042 4114A1364 ARNOLD DAvrn L 0529 -00028 295..66 t 1 3 _ 0042 4 71 4021 15 ATCHI SON JOHN H 0529 749.5 0042 476721577 HANICK JOH *d J C5.29 -00030 544.49 { ) �; 0042 469689967 P.OUMA A RICK A ^529 -00031 579.Q, 9 ,Y 0042 468461930 CLAUSON DALE K 0529 - -00032 759.74 0042 476446119 DREGER RICHARD C 0529 -00033 841.66 { ) 11 } 0042 47C267887 GREEN NORMAN L 0 529 -CO034 648.26 I 0042 392240565AGEN THOM L 0529 -00035 508.46 " 0042 469568516 HALWEG KEVIN R 0529 -00036 610,57 121 _.... -. +0042 473604916 1- ERBERT M: CHA= L J 0529 -CO037 589.x'9 13 1 0042 472222231 I(CRTUS DCNALO U C529 -00038 174.82 ) ' 14 0042 471563591 LANG RICHARD J 0529 -00039 629.10 ( ) � 0042 469181347 MCNU TY JI)HN J 0529 -00040 129 11 !2c 18� -� 0042 474607686 ME'EHANO J AME S E 0529 -00041 684,69 { ) 21 12 ' 171 .9 T 74 4 162 1 7 M_ TTLER DANIEL 8 - 0529 00042 776.36 t ) +z: = '81 0042 469442063 MOESCHTER RICHARD M 0529- 00043 237 * 97 { ) ,.., 1� 0042 476340990 MORELL.I RAYMOND J Cr529 -00044 574.38 ! < 0042 468462384 FELTIER WILLIAM F 052900045 674.E9 t VOID Replaced Ck#0529001b3 ' , `, 4 705204 57 SKALMAN DONALD W_0529m.00046 374932...___._... - -0042 0042 4 7 3 54 82 2 6 S T A F'V E G R t G 0 R Y L 0529-00047 . 7 J 8. 2 4 i241 0042 471721204 STEFFE N SCOTT L 9529.0004$ 289.02 0042 471500251 STILL W. RNON T 0529 -00049 I.> 01042 471629204 STOCKTON DARRELL T 0529 -00050 751.89 { ) �f J042 4716020 52 YHCMALLA DAVID J 0529 - 0005.1 500.54 2711 - 0042 . WItLI AMS DUANE J 0529.00052 ...__.__.�......�.,3 48 r_.___. 0042 4 7 4 2 6 C} 13 0 Z A P P A JOSEPH A 0 5 2 9 -0 C 0 5 3 711* 79 `3i 0042 �3.3 0043 475548434 EECKER RCNALO C 0529.00054 265.32 1 -- - ___ -- - -- - -- - -- - - - 0043 _. 469441789....- _ GRAF DAVID M C529aP000.55 ...._ _..... 610 3: 0043 469820466 HEINZ STEPHTN J 0529 -00056 729,53 ff U043 392760009 K AKIS FLINT D 0529 -00057 9926 . { i4E1 , ^043 476401388 L.EF_ ROGER W 0529 -00058 737965 'It '?04 3 4 73567791 MELANDER JON A C 52 9 -000 59 44.28 { ) :4V tfs, 0043 468360918 NELSON CAROL M 0529 -00060 886.69 0043 471504316 _RAZSKAZOFF DALE F 0529 -OJ061 754 ( _ 0043 4 71 564801 RYAN MIC HAEL P ( 529 - 001062 586.95 { I K j1 4 11 0043 4744,96' 71 YORWERK ROBERT E '?529- 00063 221.54 { ) '�`' ,1 0043 469502201 YOLNGREN JAMES G 0529 -00064 768.72 1 0043 5 * 705.15 � 4S _ 0045 471401878 EMBERTSON JAMES M 0529 -00065 716.50 t ) ;ec ie 0045 472242227 SCHADT ALFRED C 0529.00066 790.33 49 i - i 0045 1 X506.83 `J f)`J Ia J 0046 _..- -_. 4694 C'A! -ANES ANTHCNY G 0529 - 00067 50,r Ba ~� 7046 477627236 FLALGHEIR JAYEE L 0529 -00068 462.30 ►i 0046 376719873 MADELL RAYMOND M 0529 -00069 451.04 1 172 1 73 7Sys j w CttY OF MAPLEW0CC PAYPCLLwCI -ELKS RE'GIE-TER CYCLE 8010 CHECK VATS 06- ►Ci -P4 o"QIOD ENCING ^5 -25.84 RAGE 3 DEPT -NO EM Ld- NO EMPLOYEE TAME CHECK -NO AMOUNT CLEARED 0046 473Rl7130 PARTIA SNAWt P 0529 470:08 's ;3 I 0046 472365919 ( ELSON KAREN A C,529v -0L 071 380.31 t _ ,_._..... a� -. - --. 0046 a 4b 6t�Q1 83 RABINE • JAN ET L �: 0529 -00072 451 ,C4 t ,� 0046 4777QJ322 T S aHNKE � JULI_ A ^ 9--003 .52 7 71 3 3. ,. 0046 2 038.0 ! ilk• 3 0051 471440267 BARTA MARIE L 0529 -00074 - 241 • 99, ( ) 0051 473566972 hAIDER KENNcTH G 0529 - 0%075 6C.E1 t ) +'' � 0051 504483174 WEG6ERTN JUCT TH A J529 -00076 359.96 662.47 * ' in; 0052 496308314 CASS WILLIAM C 0529 -OG077 669.52 _' i 0Q52 471526254 FREBEQG RCNALD L 0529- O0u'78 4009?F t 1052 502544,137 NELEY RONALD J 0529 -000 79 610. '98 s� 0052 471501241 K4NE MTCNAEL R C529 -00080 412.16 - i ']�?5 2 4683634 73 KLAUS ING HENRY F 6529 -00C 81 483.46 t ' 0052 475 Et114 31 LUTZ DAVID P 0529 -00082 483.88 � 005 2 471500547 MEYER Gc RALD W 0529 511.57 t -�� 0052 416904500 CSWALD CRICK D . 529 -00084 336 *00 t� - 0052 468166 PRFTTNER JOSEPH B 0529 - 00085 863.47 -� 0052 472241484 REINERII EDWARD A 0529 -00086 631.69 -� 0052 470346224 TEVLIN •JR HARRY J 0529.00087 623.80 26; 0052 475589777 ZAPPA JAMES P 0529 -00088 235.18 t ) 0052 i� P01 0053 472683970 AHL -JP. RAY C 0529 -00089 771 t ;j'i - 0053 4724815 10 ELIAS JAMES G 6529 - 00090 703.74 I 0053 167246109 GEISSLER WALTER M 0529 -00091 606.34 X3053..____ 5 GESSELE . JAMES T 0529 - 00092 _ . _ 807.50 ;4; 0053 4 7544168 8 PECK DENN IS L 0529-00093 549.76 }351 0053 472662522 FRIEBE WILLIAM 0529 -030 51204 t ) y7 ! 0053 3 051 .29 (,, 0054 473683775 LOFGREN J R 4529 - 00095 J 0 5 4 4 38.5 2 0058 471562563 EREHEI M RAGE R W 0529 -00096 53104 t ) 0059 4776025 82 EDSON DAVID 6 0529 -CO097 589 t 0058 470541590 MULWEE G -70RGE W 6529- 00098 499.10 t ) 0158 471501014 PACFAU EDWARD A 1 1 529m00099 52901 t i -!! 005 469 361720 NUTESON LAV�.RNE S 0529 - 00100 468.45 905p 471365993 OMEN GE RALD C 0529 -00101 581].45 ) ! I �# 0058 3 9 19 9.12 "i 0059 476249760 MACDONALO JOHN E 0529 - 001 503 =� 0059 475501300 MULVANEY D� Nr1IS M X'529 - 031,03 691.93 t ) 7 �,.� 0059 1 0195.8t CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL-oCHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8010 CHECK DATE 06-01w84 PERtOD ENDING 05m*254*84 PAGE 4 DEPT•hC EMPL—NQ EmFLOYEE-NAP.E. . CHECXm.AC_ AP,0Vfl,. KRUMMEL j— 477301066 A-A THCMAS C 0529.001 14 . 0061 468341993 KRUMMEL BARBARA A 0529-00105 157.06 0529w,001 15 107.88 0061 473260389 CDEGARD ROBERT D 0529m00106 972olO 0529- 001 16 ~ 0529 0 00 0061 468582618 STAPLES PAULINE LINDORFF 0.5.2 9mo 0.1.0. 7- 5 8.6 6 -00117 556*74 E 0529-00132 0062 473565506 PARUSKA. MA R K A 0529&*00118 o 0061 0.0 4740TO! HKE_.4_ ----ALOE R-T-. 102902 x 0062 0062 474928762 FRENNER JAY A — 6 - 2 9-00108 0 t x 0062 471447219 BURKE MYLES R 0529m00109 45.22 0062 - 0062 474608182 GERMAIN DAVID A 0529-00110 510o42 x 0062 0062 472303411 GUSINDA HELvrN J 0529-*00111 851o91 4 0062 0062 474924209 HAAG MATTHEW J 05294w00112 0*00 c X. nnih 7 5 0 2 5 4 4 21 MF*l irV am A tan im 4 52gonnivi ft2Q 2A 0529*-00139 o*cf! 0062 468584797 FOPKINS THCMAS C 0529.001 14 400000 t x 0062 473969784 PUNTER TONY JANINE 0529w,001 15 107.88 0000 t 0062 4'71 8 31 3 L rBHAROT T D 0529- 001 16 ~ 0529 0 00 X 0062 473503915 LINDORFF DENNIS P -00117 556*74 E 0529-00132 0062 473565506 PARUSKA. MA R K A 0529&*00118 583oC4 JAMES 0.0 4740TO! HKE_.4_ ----ALOE R-T-. _t x 0062 477646662 SANDQUIST THOMAS J 0529 -001 0000 t x 0062 476203439 SANTA REED E 0529w00121 194042 0062 - 475904189 - - tit TOWNLEY MICHAEL F 0 52 9,w00 122 0000 t x 0062 8 1931 - TOWNLEY PATRICK J 0529.00123 0000 1 x 0062 475745266 WARD TROY 6 0529.00124 80000 0529.00138 98000 0062 39958e89 * 0063 475823190 EkARTHOLMY JODY 14 0529-=00125 0000 c x .0063 2 704 83797 BLACK WILLIAM J 0529- 00126 199*59 4 4 0063 474442474 BUNKE x RTCMARD to 0529-oOO127 0000 4. 063 476924605 CAssrnAy rL 7&AFTH .1 n S 2 QaOla 12 It 0 0 34 35 36 37 3 H 39 41 42 43 44 45 46 k147 =&E 0063 473684976 CASSEDAT MARY K 0529 -001 29 0*00 t x 0063 474901922 C Ik CER M JANINE P 0529moal 30 0000 t x 0,063..-.--..---.-,.-47672,1245.--...- DOUGHTY . 0063 469948845 FALTEISEK JAMES E 0529-00132 0000 0063 475826712 #4ARPER JAMES 052 9 -00133 0000 c X* 7668699.6----Y.ERBE.R. N 0063 470881140 JOHNSON JOSEPH A 052900135 154o65 0063 474743915 KORTUS JAMES M 0529-n00136 0000 t x 0063 468984615 I(RLMMEt BECKY 10529,m00137 0 • Ca 0 0063 470269324 PAC DONALD ELAINE E 0529.00138 98000 0063 476923936 MAGILL JOSEPH M 0529*-00139 o*cf! 0063 — 6 0 mft 0.0 S X L 0 470926903 MESSIN KATHLEEN M 0529- 00141 0000 t x 0063 474966150 MINELICH CTNDI L 0529-00142 125*00 0063 472808158 P A DGE. T 11 . -MARCIE D.0529-w00143 b063 469848105 FFARS ON LESLIE A 0529,w00144 0*00 t X ) 0063 472941928 PELTIER MICHAEL R 0529-m00145 285,94 ) VOID 0063 * 468827763 0 A CA 1 C H A E L. 0 5 4ft 0063 7' 4 2 6 4 5 SPA_ KATHLEEN G 0529-00147 0*00 t x 0063 477920170 STRAUS L4URA J 0529,=00148 125.00 7- 74 7t I CITY OF PAPLEWOCO PAYROLL•CNECKS REGISTER CYCLE. 8010 CPECK DATE 06- 01 .84 PERIOD ENCING 05.25m84 PAGE 5 OEPT•NO _ cMPL,. - EMPLOYEE. NAME...-... _. _ CHEGKlw.NO.__._ -_— AM0UNT...._... -CLE -.. 2 0063 471823921 SZUREK JOANN M 0529.00149 0000 I X I j UCLA .. ___.....al. __:�.... _ �� 1$__�_s t X 44.5 TQ6 0� -O Q 1 4 1 4 0063 470963203 WALLACE JON T 0529 -00151 299,63 t 1 s '5 0063 396324246 WARD ROY G 0529 -00152 278931 t 1 7 d 0063 474606610 ZAFN WILL IA P _. _ .._A 0529 _ _ 0.x'0 �7 o a 0063 2.205,10 11 p 12 _ 10 0064 151440508 GREY JANET M 0529 -00154 521.20 t ► 1 4 0064 471384624 HORSNELL JUDITH A 0529 -00155 258.57 t 1 14 it � , t2 0064 4 745421 63 SOUTTER CHRISTINE 0529 -Q0156 300.01 t I _ 16 � 17 13 14 - 006 1 X079.78 * 1e . 1 18 20 16 0071 389448993 CFLEBECK .JUDY M 0529.00157 357.20 t / 21 0071 474540551 OLSON GEOFFREY W 0529- 00158 802•E6 i 1 22 17 23 18 24 19 Q +� �2 . 20 27 21 ? 8 A 9!r > .. 8 4 i 213, i E K.�TR A NQ _ .. T3� 0H .� - . ..,,,... t 22 0072 475608505 40OHNSON RAND L 0 533.96 t 1 23 31 24 00 722 �.� 2� .4a 3 26 0073 476090677 OSTROM. MARJGRxE 0529 79905 ;;l5 27 _. 3d 28 0073 799055 37 ze 30! 30 00 ?4 _387520776WENGER ___..._.___._...ROBERT J 0529 -00162 563 8 __.� _._. ... _ _ 40 31 41 13 0074 563.80 i 42 431 33 00 4 6846288 4 __. ] E!iTlg LL 0 52. «- 016 640.5 X44 34 COUNT 00162 G R A A O T C T A L xKx4ujmxltxx 35 43 '�� $ 62,952.55 47 36 48 37 410 ' 38 �. 31f 39 52 4 v ao� 42 53 44 �Sf ab a�� 47 63 4s 64 { ab 60 47 5 1 32 69 70 33 711 54 72 55 73 74 56 751 i m � _ 5 MEMORANDUM Action by Counci� Endors eft _ Modifiea. Rejected_.... To: City Manager Date FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: Traffic Signal Agreement No. 62148 - -Co. Rd. C & T,-H. 61 DATE: June 4, 1984 The attached agreement binds the city to pay for the installation and engineering cost for the Emergency Vehicle Pre- emption System at the above intersection. The estimated amount is $6247.64. It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolu- tion authorizing executing the agreement and authorize financing the improvement from the Street Construction Fund. iw Attachment MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL = AGREEMENT N0. 62148 r BETWEEN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE COUNTY OF RAMSEY AND THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA TO Install Traffic Control Signals with Emergency ehicle Pre-emption, Y street lights and signing at Trunk Highway No. 61 g y at County State Aid Highway No. 23 (County Road C) in Maplewood Ramse • i • y County,, Minnesota. S.P. 6222 -97 Prepared by Traffic Engineering AMOUNT RECEIVABLE AMOUNT ENCUMBERED Ramsey Count $36,324.88 pity of Maplewood $6,247.64_ None THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the State of Minnesota, - Department of Transportation, - here inafter -_- referred to as the "State the County of Ramsey, hereinafter refereed to as the - "County" ; and the City of Maplewood, hereinafter referred to as "City ", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the State has determined that there is justification and it is in the public's best interest to provide a traffic control signal with Emergency Vehicle Pre - emption on Trunk Highway :N.o. 61 at County State Aid Highway No. 23 ( County Road C) in the City; and WHEREAS, the City requests and the State agrees to provide an Emergency Vehicle Pre - emption System, hereinafter referred to as the " 'EVP System", as a part of said traffic control signal with stre lights and signing installation in accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the materials, equipment, labor and miscellaneous items necessary to construct, operate, maintain, revise and remove said EVP System shall be at the sole cost and expense of the City; and WHEREAS, is is considered in the public's best interest for the State to provide a traffic signal cabinet with control equipment to operate said traffic control signal and Emergency Vehicle Pre - emption control and interface equipment to operate said EVP System; and :! WHEREAS, the County, the City, and the State will share in the cost, maintenance and operation of the traffic control signal and EVP system as hereinafter set forth; .,,�_ 62148 Now, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 10 The State shall prepare the necessary glans, specifications and proposal and shall perform the engineering and iri: required to complete the items of work hereinafter set forth. Such work as described immediately above shall constitute "Engineering and Inspection" and shall be so referred to hereinafter. 2. The contract cost of the work or, if the work is not :contracted, the cost of all labor, materials, and equipment rental required to complete the work, except the cost of providing the power supply to the service poles or pads, shall constitute the :actual "Construction Cost" and shall be so referred to hereinafter. 3. Costs for EVP System control and interface. equipment, cables, detectors and lights for the traffic control signals provided for herein shall be paid by the City at its sole cost and expense. Estimated EVP system cost is $5,894.00, which includes $4,000.00 State furnished materials, to be 100 percent City Funds. 4. The State with its own forces and equipment or by contract shall install the traffic control signals with street - lights on Trunk Highway No. 61 at County State Aid Highway No. 23 ( County Road C) in accordance with the plan and specifications for State Project No. 6222 -97 made a part hereof by reference. Participation in the Construction Cost is 50 percent State and 50 percent County. Estimated Construction Cost is $68,537.50 which includes $10,300 for State furnished materials. 62148 -2- 5. Upon execution of this agreement and a request in writing by the State, the. County and the City shall advAnce to the State an amount equal to . their share of the costs based on the actual bid price and the estimated cost for State furnished materials plus 6 percent of their respective amounts for the County's 'and the City's share of the cost of Engineering and Inspection. 6. Upon final payment to the Contractor and computation of County's and the City's share for the work provided for herein, that amount of the funds advanced by the County and the City in excess of their share will be returned to them without interest and the County and the City agree to pay to the State that amount of their share which is in excess of the amount of the funds advanced by them. 7. The State shall install or cause the installation of overhead signing and shall maintain said signing all at no cost to the County or the City. 8. The County shall install or cause the installation of an adequate electrical power supply to the service pole or pad including any necessary extensions of power lines, and upon completion of the traffic control signal with street lights installation shall provide necessary electrical power for its operation and shall maintain the street lights at the cost and expense of the County. 90 Upon completion of the work contemplated in Paragraph 4 hereof; it shall be the County.'s responsibility, at its 62148 -3- cost and expense, to: ( 1) relamp the traf fic control signals and ( 2 ) clean and paint the traffic control signals, cabinets, luminai r e mast arms and pole shaft extensions. It shall be the State's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to perform all other traffic control signal and street light maintenance. 10. The EVP System provided for in paragraphs 4 hereof shall be installed, operated, maintained, revised or removed in accordance with the following conditions and requirements: a. All modifications, revisions and maintenance of the EVP System considered necessary or desirable, for any reason, shall be done by State forces, or, upon concurrence in writing by the State's Traffic Engineer, may be done by others all at the cost and expense of the City. b. Emitter units may be installed and used only on vehicles responding to an emergency as defined in Minnesota Statutes Chapter.169001, Subdivision 5 and 169.03. Vehicle emitter units used in the City shall be installed only under a City permit approved by the State's District Engineer or his duly appointed representative. c. The City shall maintain and require others using the EVP System to maintain a log showing the date, time and type of emergency for each time any traffic signal covered hereby is actuated and controlled by the EVP System, and 62148 -4- 62148 -5- that said logs shall be made available to the State upon request. Malfunction of the EVP System shall be reported to the State - immediately. d. In the event said EVP System or components are, in the opinion of the State, being misused or the conditions set forth in paragraph b above are violated, and such misuse or violation continues after receipt by the City of written notice thereof from the State, the State shall remove the EVP System. Upon removal of the EVP System pursuant to this Paragraph, the field wiring, cabinet wiring and other components shall become the property of the State. All infrared detector heads and indicator lamps mounted external to the traffic signal cabinet will be returned to the City. The detector receiver and any other assembly located in the traffic control signal cabinet, which if removed will not affect the traffic control signal operation, will be returned to the City. e. All timing of said EVP System shall be determined by the State through its Commissioner of Transportation. - 11. Upon proper execution by the City and the State, the EVP System for the traffic control signal on Trunk Highway No. 61 at County State Aid Highway No. 23 (County Road C) shall become a 62148 -5- part of Signal Maintenance Agreement No. 1629 -R between Maplewood and the State covering operation, revision, maintenanc- and I removal of _ EVP Systems by State forces at the cost and expense of the City. 12. Any and all persons engaged in the aforesaid work to be performed by the State shall not be considered employees of the County or the City and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workmen's Compensation Act of this State on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made by any fourth party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work contemplated herein shall not be the obligation and responsibility of the County or City. 13. Timing of the traffic control signal provided for herein shall be determined by the State, through its Commissioner of Transportation, and no changes shall be made therein except with the approval of the State. 62148 _6_ v ' ■ a APPROVED AS TO FORM: COUNTY OF RAMSEY r By Chairman of the Board Dated County Attorney (County Seal) RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL County Attorney .APPROVED AS TO FORM: Chief Clerk - County Board CITY OF MAPLEW City Attorney By Mayor Dated (City Seal) By City Clerk 62148 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION R]�ZOM DED FOR APPROVAL: �f Distri t Engineer Operations Division r DEPARTMENT OF TRA14SPORTATION By Assistant Commissioner Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION: DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION Special'Assistant Attorney By General - State of Minnesota D ated: 62148 -8- ii • RESOLUTION NO. BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood enter into an agreement. with the State of Minnesota, Department of 'T- ransportation for the following purposes, to -wit: To provide a traffic control signal with street lights, signing, and Emergency Vehicle Pre - emption System on Trunk Highway No. 61 at County State Aid Highway No. 23 (County Road C) in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and contained in Agreement No. 62148, a copy of which was before the Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED.that the proper City officers be and hereby are authorized to execute such agreement, and thereby assume for and on behalf of the City all of the contractual obligations contained therein. CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Ramsey City of Maplewood I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the Council of the City of Maplewood at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the day of , 1984, as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession. (Seal) City Clerk = Treasurer 6 TO: FROM: t SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT /OWNER: PROJECT: .DATE: Action by Couryvil: MEMORANDUM op Endorsed,._... Modif i ed...._., Rejected..., City Manager Date Associate Planner Johnson Time Extension -- Preliminary plat Hi ghwood Avenue, west of Phyl i s Court William Leonard Leonard's Oak Hills No. 5 May 17, 1984 SUMMARY Reqeust A one —year time extension for.the preliminary plat approval. Reason for Request Refer to the applicant's letter (page 7 ). Coments The applicant has been making a good faith effort to secure financing for this development. Construction is expected to begin late this summer. Granting of a second time extension is justified, given the circumstances outlined in the applicant's letter of request. Recommendation Approval of a one —year time extension for the Leonard's Oak Hills No. 5 pre - 1 imi nary plat, on the basis that the-applicant is making a good faith effort to move forward with this development in a timely manner, subject to: 1. Compliance with the original conditions 2. Final platting being approved within one year or the city w i l l record the deed that was previously submitted by the applicant for the drainage easement mistakenly vacated following the 4 -15 -82 preliminary plat approval. BACKGROUND Past Actions 4-15-82: I . Council approved the Leonard's Oak Hills No. 5 planned unit dfi:vel opment W ith the following conditions: a. Omit double dwellings on lot 12, block 6, lots 1 and 5, block 5; lots 1 and 2, block 4, lots 3, block 2 and lot 5, block 1. b. A double dwelling be approved for the easterly lot on Highwood Avenue. C, This PUD shall be void unless the plat is filed in one year or unless council grants a time extension. 2. Council approved the Leonard's Oak Hills No. 5 preliminary plat, subject to: a. A developer's agreement to be signed for the construction of all public improvements, including bike trails and erosion control measures. b. Final grading, drainage and utility plans to be submitted and approved by the city engineer. The plan shall include extending the storm sewer pipe -to the east line of the plat. C. Deed outl of A to the city. d. Construct an eight -foot wide asphalt trail in front of block 6, lots 12 -15 and from the end of the northerly cul -de -sac, along lot 1, block 1, to the north line of the plat. e. Combine lots 12, 13, 14 and 15, block 6 and divide into three lots f. Submit an.erosion control paln for approval, which considers recom- mendations from the Soil Conservation Service. g. Name the through street "Leonard Lane" the northerly cul -de -sac and stub, "Lakewood Court" and the east -west cul -de -sac and stub "Valley View Court" and'V alley View Drive" h. Dedication of utility and drainage easements, as required by the city engineer i. Readjust lot line of northerly cul -de -sac 100 feet south as presented by staff j. Attorney to approve covenants for floor area square footage. 2 3. Council approved a resolution vacating a drainage easement in the proposed plat (page 5 ). (This resolution was mistakenly recorded, without prior submission of a developer's agreement to construct a storm sewer to replace the existing open ditch,) t 6- 13 -83: _ _ r- Council approved a one —year time extension for the preliminary plat and a six—month time extension for the PUD, on the basis that: 1. The circumstances have not changed since the original approval. 2. The applicant is proceeding with the project by working on the financing and continuing with the engineering work. Approval is subject to: 1. Compliance with the original-conditions and 2. Dedication-of the drainage easement to the city to hold until the final plat is approved. Planning 1. The applicant chose to let the PUD approval expire in December 1983. The PUD was originally requested to permit several double dwellings among the single dwellings. Expiration of the PUD requires that all of the lots must be used for single dwel l i ngs. 2. Section 30 -5 (e) states that "for one year following preliminary approval .. It . unless the subdivider and the city agree otherwise, no amendment to the comprehensive plan or official control shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedication or platting required or permitted by the approved application. Thereafter, pursuant to its regul— ations, the city may extend the per od by agreement with the subdivider and subject to all applicable performance conditions and requirements, or it may require submission of a new application unless substantial physical activity and investment has occurred in reasonable reliance on the approved application, and the subdivider w i l l suffer substantial finance damage as a consequence of a requirement to submit a new application." Procedure City council decision Is Location map 2. Property line/zoning map , 3. Preliminary plat 4. Letter of request jC 3 LOWER AFTON RD ` t L A. z V NO 2 MA av �, ►� 39 12) 0' 6$ ) N - 3) PC - Ix A) 0' L (4) •f AILAND RD. ' o O C (1) LAKEWOOD DR. ?- (2) TEAKWOOD DR. >' (3) CRESTViEw DR. 14) OA KFUDCE DR. z Z C D C (S) MILL DR. O 0 C V C,Z 3 2 23 L9 NWOOO AVE. AML 72 DA HL _ z C T } O TZSN W t� R22 -- R21W 3 i a a = PHYL! 72 7 4 94 HEGHWOQD A:. f 4 T 74 25 Al( AVE. Ems' LAVE Q 25 ) SOUTHC S 72 Carver tOx WODO AVE_ Lake 494 C z • 68 • o CARVEk 72 AI 4 e LOCATION MAP 4 attachment one 0 4 N I :�& r • U70 " _ t 1 t f t� loo T 1 V E �� N ' 87 1 139.58 50 5 0K 7 K . 7` , 80 6s .J-r . � 10 4 2 4 PHYLIS CT.- -- - �, , t• 0 0 5.4 3 �, o � -AV. 65 80 . -80 8o ' e�, t •o t ' ^ir:t,l F2 3 4 b • 7 Lr Q . 40' `100.02{ WoaDS DD. 87 139.58 50 O ' °k �o 4? J 1 GSO 030 :. 32 •?.SG... r �.. ' • j ��/ • ••••.. .•t • 1 + i 1w PROPERTY LINE MAP .Drainage Easement 5 attachment two 4 N OUTLOT A m • G� • 1 + i 1w PROPERTY LINE MAP .Drainage Easement 5 attachment two 4 N op 3 • 1 + i 1w PROPERTY LINE MAP .Drainage Easement 5 attachment two 4 N I I a 1 S !D fD pR FLIMINARY PLAT LEO 4ARD .. 4 0v BILL L ONABD 18 1 6 F O REST T DALE ROAD NEW BRIGHTON MN 56112 F 0 E ---iii it /I --iii (000 1 ' 1 1\ � �� -• � � � J � , r � '�" ./ - ��.�., � � low 11.tt le,,lal., I WANI of ml•t1 1 «1t► . 1 ?111 tt ton 00411 toll M romm11l1ltw r •.-. — . , ; k-'' / J y t �11 ..''� ?gilt aml of totlt • 11 1111/ —• ..•.• -- —.. Itlf +tw tt* IoM �. _.� / ; /, MMlitt ►to►lt ►t1 Kil l ....._......_.. �' tt9lre 1 ~ {' I I `,�_ y 4 tlM�t rMltlr • ttl 1"1 1.1 t M 1 _�. it • t • 1.1 / k,t ...� ., MUMS I"M" 1111 / 111111 11 ,(f � \� � , - y_ -:• � ••, \ • \ \ \ ` tO9A< ! 1 ............. /t>DrlV1 111119?" 11" I . __ .l -.._. _ �... yl►� \ )1 \ ►tt)►tl ht Kt • IoM Mo"v UMtto1 ttUH ,�� _ 1 � '' • . 1 � / � \ iii t �,r�Jr �Q r•' -._ `.+ _ M • , w�/ • 1 !`� 1\ AIIN•1t� � 1111" ►1/1'tt� • .'�'1�....�.'1� IMOt'!M1 MM 1111111 �1�"� _ r-• ' ti �~ ItIftIM ?"I" tit ""off —$—I— Mp1l t oft, M•11 04 ` \ ►110'0111 loll" to *"I" O mime am / 1 1 /'� i / rtll ►tlti A1MIlMl� 1 tMMlt$"$ "tit tot �� ! ' - ` i• '/ ) ( • i ':``� it � �' �_ . .. __.. • � 1 � , I � I � � � { ` ` �• - 'a. � ti t - • ' ' . �,•_ _ �' — �. iii L! UA 1. floe toot » H t1 le lei toll of M• t olt.' o•1w few toll toil of IootMON 0+ pr,4e 111 1141 of 444 •4eMw41 *won" tw f /11 M •snow wtft.M 11116 -�', \ �` •...� i .L 1 (1 1. 1....41• w"IT.N w w /►1 till. n000l -eve tell, ""h as oot to Mob* t•,4 1t4ro 9/e 1«04 wrM ot we owl it 111 J •f 00 et tP•►tr �l - . l ✓✓ I _ -+ low t /11 •1 00 Mt•N.t f+•r••r 111 1/41 M WttM hlMwn fill, /w.. �- \ "�� '-� MI• Iw•H -MINI •or U1 11401. 0~ 1>tes".too owl islet, ad, 1. all UNt Mel M tM I»• •441-441+ to t /1t M 11w sm"W I forts IM 1141 M 111 owth"41 fw4N 1•Ir 1 /4l 41 MI Ifir•e" 1111, "AI %mov. . ,� `>, ' t ? i •' \ 111111 •li \t Awls.. 111011 %"o tw4t1•t•n 1 414 11101 •444e M roll" I • IMI M H• M.th~l o 006 tA4W4d rwrlq Mw 0 sot .1l J � i r I - �y 144 M • MI.1, Mow• b4t NI,I1 f4o4 1. • AW ..1• I 1 ►I,M 40 ` t / ♦ 1 - .�+r.1 ?? N� o KMW N 0 hl•tM• the 90 •4 ka I " • MH Memos" gem Me 1M If•i •••`•, �`�,��� , _ �� ; >I' r Q J.. 149.11 toot trot M me Ne•e M 6"100106, oboom •MI 1 r44. M r .. J ` iii—• �1 l I 1 + .� r 12 Lie ... -^ ... - -, ,. :-- --- .._.,,'._' � ._,. �� % ---it. p�:. 11�t � l�lAti�M Mfr M1 w AIL 1 r11. I r.,4 o 1 e d o 1 i i i •31. a 0 f>rJ • I / .4 V � �t1 � 4 I I � 1,.•t�l +I.i w. L �� fial.titlwtMe • •- moo M •r1 •r r..e �• +/ S Mr. Geoffrey Olson Director of Community Development 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Re: Leonard Oak Hills #5 Preliminary Plat Dear Yr. Olson: May 1 1984 Thank you for notifying us that preliminary plat approval for the above plat expires June 13, 1984. Without trying to make excuses for our failure to begin development of this property, we feel obliged to explain the facts of the matter to you. My wife and I own this property as joint tenants. It is a "Ma and Pall o- oeration, not a corporation with lots of outside financial backing, We began buying this property many years ago as an investment for our old -age re tirembnt . Financing required for the first phase of the devel- opment is estimated at $220, 000.00. we could only personally finance about half of that amount, and would need to borrow the balance. We presently own 26 lots in the city of St. Paul, which are for sale on the real estate market at the present time. As they sell, we intend to immed- iately use this money for financing the Oak Hills #5 project, 'We are now retired from a regular salaried job as of 1983. Together with the existing economy causing fluctuating interest rates which have resulted in a "boom or bust" new- construction housing cycle, we have serious reservations about borrowing such a large amount of money at the present time, We have already invested a considerable amount of money, time, and energy in the firm of Suburban Engineering, who have done a fine job of completing all the engineering work and cost estimates for this project; so you can see, we are most sincere in our desire to proceed with the development of Leonard Oak Hills #5 - -- - but just do not want to get our- selves in a financial trap.. It is our-'. intent, providing that lot sales in St. Paul produce the results we expect, to proceed with the development of Leonard oak Hills #5 as soon as possible, hopefully by late summer, With the Council's understanding and kind permission, we do hereby formally request a one-year extension of preliminary 7olat approval,, Sincerely yours, William E. Leonard, Bonnie L. Leonard 7 attachment four t.: i TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT/OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: MEMORANDUM City Manager Associate Planner -- Johnson Final Plat County Road D and Lakewood Drive Ti1sen Homes, Inc. Robert Tilsen's Maplewood Heights #11 May 25, 1984 Request Final plat approval, Action by Co, Endorsed _ ,.._ Modif i e d,...,., Rejected_._, Date All of the requirements for final plat approval have been satisfied. (See past actions.) Recommendations 2,1 Approval of Robert Tilsen's Maplewood Heights #11 final plat. BACKGROUND Past Actions 7- 25 -83: 1 . Council approved the Robert Ti 1 sen Maplewood Heights #11 planned u n i t development, subject to: - • - a. Construction beg i nnn i ng within one year. b. The northerly twenty feet of lots one through twelve, block one shall be landscaped prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the block. The landscaping shall provide a protective screen of at least eighty percent opaqueness, six feet in height. c. The corners of each lot shall be identified by land survey monument prior to the issuance of any occupancy permit within block one, within lots one through thirteen of block two and within lots fourteen through twenty -five of block two. d,. The footings for each structure shall also be pinned and flagged for inspection prior to the foundations being laid to assure that the common walls are located exactly on the common lot lines. e. Adherence to the preliminary plat received by the city on July 6, 1983, subject to changes approved by the city. 2. Council approved the Robert Tilsen's #11 preliminary plat, dated July 6, 1983, subject to: a. Approval of the planned unit development by the same name. b. Council authorizing the vacation of Lakewood Drive from Brenner Avenue to County Road D. Final plat approval shall not be granted until a developer's agreement is. submitted for the easterly extension of Gall Avenue and the removal and reseeding of Lakewood Drive north of Gall Avenue. c. Council ordering the construction of a storm sewer, . west along Gall Avenue prior to final plat approval. If the project is not ordered, approval must be obtained from the city engineer for a drainage plan to enlarge the existing facilities, including the pond west of Lakewood Drive at Brenner Avenue. d. City engineer approval of final grading, utility and drainage plans. e. Submittal of a developer's agreement for street and utility construction. f. Submittal of an acceptable erosion control plan before any building permits are issued, which considers the recommendations of the Soil Conservation Service. g. The easterly fifty feet of lot 25, block 2 shall be shown as Bellaire Avenue right -of -way on the final plat. h. The park lying south of the proposed plat shall be vacated.prior to final plat approval. -2- i . The "park" property lying to the south shall be included i n the subject plat. That part of the "park" property to be combined with the single dwelling lots to the south shall be platted as outl ots. The remainder of the "park" property shall `be included as part of the lots in the proposed plat. j. Prior to final plat approval, deeds shall be submitted to the city for recording for the combination of any of the "park" property with the - abutting single-dwelling lots to the south. All costs associated with the land transfers and combination shall be borne by the developer and included in the developer's agreement for Robert Ti 1 sen' s Maplewood Heights #11. Each of the deeds shall include a deed restriction stating that "separation of the properties described in this instrument shall not be permitted unless authorized by the City of Maplewood." 3.. Council approved the vacation of Lakewood Drive from Brenner Avenue to County Road D. subject to retention of a drainage and utility easement and submission of a developer's agreement for the 11th addition plat. 8 -8 -83: Council authorized the vacation of the park located along the south boundary of this site, subject to the property being combined with adjoining private property and retention of a drainage easement (shown on the final plat). 4- 24 -84: The community design review board approved the b u i l d i n g elevation and landscape ,plans for the 11th addition double dwellings. Prnrntliirn City council approval iw Attachments 1. Location map Z. Property line/zoning map 3.. Final plat -3- • w f7ITE BEAR _ tt� s. arctlrt R Mg. 58 (s ) , A An � RRE cNY�. i-- 2640 N. C iE IN 0 2400N s YE. KE � Sllrtr =- , f O 4w � r (Z .) C *ppE Mh C pteLt (10 CHIPMWA MWIL Ole* ® PRUATE STREET �MESSABI AVE) NORTH ST. PAUL attachment one LOCATION MAP -4- I A. IA 7 40, f �. 4 f Et 5) t L) — — -- -- t I - Y s f NS P Easement -, of j O ( Vacated) LB-1 .241 � - =3 ��.�. �. ��.� - - , • � — 4�6 4b9 c t Y I L c 4� 9 f 9 N ,,� � 1 � l7 � �cj L F ID UVOW AN o o t\ -a. 7e f+ ? Se 3! cy E BREI�tJER A� - A .� > SA .5 �. « . E BRENtVER AVE 54 , 3 2 � � 1 J . `• �� v � L � ilk � e> � , v . ' ` , * y � ' ~ o *• � � R � s o ` �5 , �'" �� �°+ ''°�► . �. O � . s r c. . , g r 1 7 5 4 .8,b w�•- 2 o Q 99.01 2 �o �� 24 23 22 h t 4 �t� ��i � �ti' ��5 21 OL j �. O O o 30 *; o S - 7 94 ! �i7 - �p St.73 1 w 4 12 S 3 i 4*8.0 1 UZ 06. o 1 Go �_s.o V �� 12'! � ' r 6 e v' - vi ° o �� 33 34 19 w 12 4 J 5 o I! 5 4 �o �o n 2s ''`.s Est, 3 N �_ ~ !- ! "• 4 32 35 } I1 - t 10 �0. 5 r 27 lT •T Z Z.�7 V �2t.67 O , —j o 2 :' +t L,. 7 R� �' >..t 9 c o f w N f 31 36 . 6 b Z m w 28 PROPERTY - LINE /ZONING MAP attachment two 4 N ROBERT TILSEN'S - MAPLEWOo D HEIGHTS No. ! 1 FINAL PLAT R P 0 OSAL -6- • C ' \\ • yam• - •*• �.� ��+ i 10 . to .41ILM CALL rs •,. ,, 40 _ - `�� _' _ - - ..-.. �..�- •...,._ �' - _ �-- '� �_ �- • + � _� •.��_ OITTLOt 71 OVYLVT / QutLCt 011TlOt O • ..rte.. �. rr .� OYTLOT E .. •�` .r ��„� ;- a�::: r �� ♦ _ • - V r A - _ • , r �' _ IONTLpT OvTLOT ovtr . • • . �. . tit ` S LOT - lus ~ i _ OUT Lay 1 OUTLOT 1 OUT6OT « i ...__ 7 :� .:._— .i_ _. _ ____ .rt ...f —. — — �- — — -'yam" � .. -�. _ . _ " � - -,: ;, OuTLOT r � .' .. w -- -- _ — • •-: •.w Robert Tilsen's #9 - - 4 ROBERT TILSEN'S - MAPLEWOo D HEIGHTS No. ! 1 FINAL PLAT R P 0 OSAL -6- The Fifth Anniversary Nature Center Celebration, which took place on Saturday, May 19, was a success. Our grateful ap- preciation to the members of the Council who attended the Nature Center and added to the friendliness of the Nature Center. We were also privileged to have with us Les Blacklock, na- ture writer and photographer. Mr. Blacklock was involved in the original planning for the Nature Center and has, therefore, had a special interest in its development. He permitted us to sell his books and posters with the intent that the profits would be used by the Nature Center. In- come from sales amounted to $1314.00 (which includes State sales tax of $46.63). Payment of books and posters amounted to $777.22, leaving a profit of $490.15. We request Council approval of the following: 1) Increase estimated revenue by $1270.00 2) Increase account 01- 4120 -64 by $780.00 (Nature Center program supplies to pay for posters and books) 3) Increase 01- 4630 -64 by $490.00 (Capital Outlay account for the Nature Center) Action by Council: �- Endorsed....._. _ Modified___. MEMORANDUM Rejected..... Date ,..._ --- � r , To: Barry Evans, City Manager ,F rom: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Community Service Subj: Nature Center Fifth Anniversary Funds � Date: May 29, 1984 The Fifth Anniversary Nature Center Celebration, which took place on Saturday, May 19, was a success. Our grateful ap- preciation to the members of the Council who attended the Nature Center and added to the friendliness of the Nature Center. We were also privileged to have with us Les Blacklock, na- ture writer and photographer. Mr. Blacklock was involved in the original planning for the Nature Center and has, therefore, had a special interest in its development. He permitted us to sell his books and posters with the intent that the profits would be used by the Nature Center. In- come from sales amounted to $1314.00 (which includes State sales tax of $46.63). Payment of books and posters amounted to $777.22, leaving a profit of $490.15. We request Council approval of the following: 1) Increase estimated revenue by $1270.00 2) Increase account 01- 4120 -64 by $780.00 (Nature Center program supplies to pay for posters and books) 3) Increase 01- 4630 -64 by $490.00 (Capital Outlay account for the Nature Center) 6 i Action by Coln -,.1 LAIS, BANNIGAN &KELLY, P.A.""0* Endorsed,__ ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING ` Modifi ed, 5TH AND CEDAR Rejected SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 Date DONALD L. LAIS AREA CODE 612 JOHN F. BANNIGAN, JR. 224 -3781 PATRICK J. KELLY May 25, 1984 Barry Evans City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood MN 55109 RE: Maplewood Public Improvement Project 78-10 Parcel 1 John J. Kirby and Ardith Kirby Our File No. 4555 Dear Mr. Evans: John J. Kirby and Ardith Kirby, the owners cif Parcel 1, located in the City of Maplewood were assessed in the amount of $20,268.00 on March 4, 1982. The Kirby's pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 429.061 and 429.081 initiated a timely appeal from that special assessment for local. Public Improvement 'jProject 78 -10. The matter was set for trial before a special judge, designated by the Minnesota Supreme Court on May 4, 1984 in District Court. Mr. Winfield Mitchell, a Certified Appraiser established. that the benefit to the property was in an amount of $20,268.60. The nature of the assessment was for storm sewer and drainage works. It should be noted that the basis of- Parcel assessment was for contribution by way of runoff to the storm sewer and drainage system of Project 78 -10. Upon negotiations it was felt that the reduction of $1,012.40 was reasonable balanced with the cost of litigation, engineering time and staff allocations. Mr.. Barry Evans May 25, 1984 A Page 2 We recommend that the Council approve the Stipulation and pass the enclosed Resolution. After their execution please return to our office for filing purposes . If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, LAIS, BANNIGAN & KE LY, P.A. V Patrick J. Kelly RESOLUTION NO, STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood, on March 4, 1982, assessed certain real property located generally at the South of Ma ilan Road and Easterly of Crestview, also known as 2488 Mailan Road,. for Maplewood public improvement project number 78 -10, identified therein as Parcel No. 1, for certain storm sewer and drainage works, and the fee owners John J. Kirby and Ard i th Kirby thereof , took timely appeal therefrom to the Ramsey County District Court; and WHEREAS, the City and Owners have entered into a Stipulation of Settlement of Dismissal dated the day of May, 1984, whereunder: the assessments levied March 4, 1982 for said afore- mentioned local public improvement reduced by $1,013.00 from $20,268.60 to $19,255.60; and WHEREAS, the City Attorney, by his letter of even date with said Stipulation recommended a reduction as above - indicated; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Maplewood finds the above- referenced property has increased in market value by the amount of $19,255.60 and that said increase in market value is directly attributable to the public improvement hereinbefore described. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Maplewood that the special assessments levied against Parcel No. 1 more particularly described therein from $20,268.60 to $19,255-60 effective March 4, 1982, and that said special assessment and all other particulars remain and be the.same as orginally adopted. ADOPTED THIS day of , 1984. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD , RAMSEY COUNTY , • MINNESOTA By Its Mayor By Its Manager ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: Budget Transfer - Audit Costs DATE: May 22, 1984 Action by Council: Endorsed... Modified.._. Rei ecte Date A budget transfer of $3,000 is needed to finance the 1983 audit bill despite the fact that the total bill was 14% less than 1982. The reason a budget transfer is needed is because the portion of the bill allocated to the General Fund has increased as indicated i n the following: DFF :1 nb Increase(Decrease} 1982 1983 Amount Percent General Fund $ 4 $ 7 $3,275 79/ Capital Project Fund 960 1,650 690 72/ Special Assessment Fund 8 3 (5,000) (60) Sewer Fund 4 2 (2,155) (47) V.E.M. Fund 1 1 490 72 Totals $19,200 $16,500 ($2,700) (14/) The 1984 Budget anticipated $4,400 for General Fund audit fees, It is recommended that the Council approve a $3,000 transfer from the Contingency Account to finance the General Fund audit fees. DFF :1 nb z f MEMORANDUM Action by Council: TO: City Manager ll FROM: Finance Director f- Endorsed.._._ RE Special Assessment Interest Rates Modified.- ....._ DATE: May 25, 1984 Rejecte Date PROPOSAL It is proposed that (1) the interest rate on special assessments for the Holloway Avenue improvements be set at 9% and (2) the interest rate on assessments for all other improvements financed by the 1983 Bond Issues be reduced to 9 %. RArKunmn On April 11, 1983 . the Council adopted the policy that the interest rate on new special assessment rolls be one percent greater than the floating maximum interest rate on bonds (see attached memoran'dum'dated March 29, 1983). Based upon this policy, the 1982 special assessments had an interest rate of 121. Prior to this, the special assessment interest rate was set annually by the Council and ranqed from 8% in 1980 to a high of 13% in 1982. The increase in interest rates has been caused primarily by the increase in bond interest rates. In 1980 and 1982, temporary rather than permanent improvement bonds were issued to avoid "locking in" over a long term the record -high interest rates in effect. (The municipal bond buyers index peaked at 13.44/ on January 14, 1982.) The special assessments levied during the past few years had corres- ponding record -high interest rates because there was no way of accurately pred i cti nq the interest rates on the permanent bonds that would be issued to refinance the temporary bonds. In 1983, the bond market was carefully monitored and a decision' eci si on' was made to refinance all of the temporary bonds due to decreases in interest rates, As a result, the permanent bonds issued in 1983 had an interest rate of 8 %. Thus, the technique of using temporary bonds was very successful. Financial projections for the 1983 bond issue indicate that future revenues will exceed debt service requirements and result in a surplus of over $390,000. The reason for this is that the majority of the assessments levied to finance the bond issue have interest rates ranging from 11% to 13 %. The $390,000 surplus will increase when the Holloway Avenue special assessments are levied as this project was also financed by the 1983 bonds. Therefore, a reduction in the special assessment interest rate for the projects financed by the 1983 bonds should be considered. The following financial projections for the debt service account for the 1983 bonds indicate its current status and two alternative assessment rate reduction options. DFF:1nb Status Reduce Reduce as of Int. Rate I nt. Rate 12 -31 -83 to 9/ to 10/ Deficit on 12 -31 -83 $-4 $- 4,032,435 $-4 Add future assessment revenue +4 +4 +4 Add future interest revenue +3,226,983 +2 +2,973 Add Holloway assessments - + 248 + 248,393 Less future bond interest - 2 - 2 - 2 $ 391 $ 89 $ 386,554 The attached schedules indicate the future interest revenue on each assessment roll at their current rates and the two reduced rates, (Assessment roll No. 5017 is for diseased trees and is at 8/ because that was the maximum rate allowed for the program.) The best alternative is reduction of the interest rate on assess- ments to 9/ even though it would still generate a projected surplus of $89,227, This surplus is needed as a safeguard for cash flow delays caused by delinquent special assessments. The City Attorney has indicated that reduction of the interest rate on assessments would not reopen the opportunity for property owners to appeal the assessments. Also, representatives of Ramsey County have indicated that there would not be any problem in reducing the assessment interest rate effective beginning with installments due in 1985. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that (1) the interest rate on special assessments for the Holloway Avenue improvements be set at 9/ and (2) the interest rate on assess- ments for all other improvements financed by the 1983 Bond Issues be reduced to 9/ effective beginning with installments due in 1985. DFF:1nb F- Z MEMORANDUM C VJ. F r. d TO - City Manager . FROM: Finance Director RE: Revision of Special Assessment Interest Rate �- `�1 ��a 3 DATE: March 29, 1983 PROPOSAL It is proposed that the interest rate on new special assessment rolls be one ,percent greater than the floating maximum interest rate on bonds. BACKGROUND The maximum permissable interest rate on new bond issues is now set monthly based upon a formula adopted by the Legislature in 1982. This formula provides that the maximum interest rate on bonds is to be based upon the Bond Buyer's Index plus one percent and then rounded to the next highest percent. Interest rates charged for special assessments may be one percent greater than the maximum interest rate permitted on bonds. The current maximum interest rates are 110 on bonds and 12% on special assess- ments. However, both of these rates can change monthly as the Bond Buyer's Index changes. Therefore, it is no longer possible for the City to set a special assessment interest rate at the beginning of each year for all new rolls to be adopted during the year. Rather, each time a new roll is adopted, a determination of the statutory maximum interest rate will have to be made. An alternative to this would be to set a low special interest rate that would always be less than the statutory maximum. This is not feasible because the interest rate must at least be the same as the interest rate on the bonds which financed the project. If not, property tax levies would be required to make up for the difference. Also, it has been past practice to set the interest rate on special assessments at a rate higher than on the bonds issued for the improve - ments to provide a cushion for special assessment delinquencies. (Delinquent special assessments are over $1.2 million.) In some cases, an exception could be made to the recommended policy on special assessment interest rates. For example, last year several new special assessment rolls were adopted which specified a 13% interest rate. The projects assessed were financed by the Temporary Improvement Bonds of 1982. These bonds may be refinanced by permanent bonds if a favorable interest rate is received on bids to be opened in May. The Council may want to consider reducing the interest rate on these assessment rolls, depending on the interest rate received on the Ma y bids. John Bannigan has been requested to determine what procedure would have to be followed and whether this would allow property owners to once again f i l e legal appeals on their assessments. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the interest rate on new special assessment rolls be one percent greater than the floating maximum interest rate on bonds. DFF:1nb CITY OF MAPLEWOOD FUTURE INTEREST ON DEFERRED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS t FUND ASSESSMENT BALANCE. REMAINING INTEREST FUTURE N0. N0. 12 -31 -83 TERM RATE INTEREST 30 1982 15479900 8 .13 9055 30 5027 26289.06 18 .13 32466 30 5093 42811.68 8 .13 25044 30 5164 29121.17 18 913 35964 _ 30 5172 217369.61 7 .il 95642 30 5173 103948.30 17 .it 102908 30 5190 6038.83 3 .11 1328 30 5266 352167.72 18 .13 434927 30 5267 182034.45 18 .13 224812 30 5302 6407.54 4 .13 2082 30 5310 96147.58 18 .13 118742 30 5311 185 791.19 18 .13 229452 30 5312 106646.51 8 .13 62388 30 5313 835964 8 913 488. 30 5017 4378.91 2 .08 525 30 5167 21765.87 17 .11 21548 30 5168 343884.95 7 oil 151309 .30 5170 543361.81 7 .11 239079 30 5174 38594.84 7 .11 16981 30 5249 300922.50 17 .il 297913 30 5250 654960.84 17 .11 648411 30 5251 61755.46 17 911 61137 30 5350 38490.87 19 .12 46189 30 5352 214025.58 19 .12 256830 30 5438 23787.73 9 .12 14272 30 5441 162485.60 9 .12 97491 TOTALS 3779503.24 3226983 t 0 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD FUTURE INTEREST ON DEFERRED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FUND ASSESSMENT BALANCE REMAINING INTEREST FUTURE N0. - wwwwww- ww- ww- N0. wwwwwwwwwwww- 12 -31 -83 TERM RATE INTEREST 30 1982 wwwww- wwwwwww- 15479.00 wwwww- www-- 8 w- wwwwmeow.. 009 - wwwwwww 6268 30 5027 26289906 18 1609 22.477 30 5093 42811.68 8 .09 17338 30 5164 29121917 18 009 24898 30 5172 217369961 7 009 78253 30 5173 103948.30 17 1009 84198 30 5190 6038.83 3 009 1086 30 5266 352167.72 18 .09 301103 30 5267 182034.45 18 009 155639 30 5302. 6407.54 4 009 1441 30 5310 96147958 18 .09 82206 30 5311 185791.19 18 .09 158851 30 5312 106646951 8 1609 43191 30 5313 835.64 8 009 338 30 5017 4378.91 2 .08 525 30 5167 21765987 17 009 17630 30 5168 343884995 7 009 123798 30 5170 543361.81 7 009 195610 30 5174 38594984 7 009 13894 30 5249 300922.50 17 .09 243747 30 5250 654960.84 17 .09 530.518 30 5251 61755946 17 009 50021 30 5350 38490.87 19 009 34641 30 5352 214025958 19 .09 192623 30 5438 23787973 9 .09 10704 30 5441 162485.60 9 .09 73118 30 HOLLOWAY 248392052 18 1809 212.375 TOTALS ------ - - - - -- 4027895.76 ------ - - - - -- 2676491 10 Is CITY OF MAPLEWOOD FUTURE INTEREST ON DEFERRED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FUND ASSESSMENT BALANCE REMAINING INTEREST FUTURE N0. wrwrrwww- NO. 12 -31 -83 TERM RATE INTEREST rw- 30 rrwrrwwrrwww-- 1982 w- ww MONO rr rww- 15479.00 rwrr- w-wwwww- 8 wwwwrmrw�ww- .1 wwwwr 6965 30 5027 26289.06 18 01 24974 30 5093 42811968 8 01 19265 30 5164 29121.17 18 01 27665 30 5172 217369.61 7 01 86947 30 5173 103948.30 17 01 93553 30 5190 6038.83 3 91 1207 30 5266 352167972 18 01 334559 30 5267 182034.45 18 01 172932 30 5302 6407.54 4 .1 1601 30 5310 96147.58 18 .1 91340 30 5311 185791.19 18 01 176501 30 5312 106646.51 8 .1 47990 30 5313 835.64 8 .1 376 30 5017 4378.91 2 .08 525 30 5167 21765.87 17 01 19589 30 5168 343884.95 7 01 137553 30 5170 543361981 7 .1 217344 30 5174 38594984 7 01 15437 30 5249 300922.50 17 01 270830 30 5250 654960.84 17 01 589464 30 5251 61755.46 17 01 55579 30 5350 38490.87 19 01 38490 30 5352 214025.58 19 .1 214025 30 5438 23787.73 9 .1 11893 30 5441 162485.60 9 01 81242 30 HOLLOWAY 248392952 18 01 235972 TOTALS ------ wwrwrwwwwwwr - - - - -- 4027895.76 ------ - w-wrwwwrwww - - - - -- 2973818 s s � Action by COUncil: MEMORANDUM Enaor ' ` ---- -- Re j e c 2 d.�._. TO: City Manager d ate FROM: Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Holloway.Avenue Improvement Assessment Roll, Project No. 81 -12 DATE: June 4, 1984 The assessment roll for the above - referenced project is herewith provided for the city council's review, and will be presented at the assessment hearing scheduled on June 11, 1984. The roll has been prepared in accordance with the cost sharing joint agreement between Maplewood, North St. Paul and Ramsey County and in accordance with current city assessment policy. Assessments are proposed to be levied against all benefited properties within the project's service area. The methods proposed for financing the improvements consist of municipal state aid funding and special assessments. Actual construction costs were used in determining the total cost of the project since the project is e s s e n t i a l l y complete. Indirect c osts incurred to date for engineering, legal and fiscal costs and project management were added to the construction cost to determine the total project cost. The cost sharing joint agreement outlined the break- down of costs between Maplewood, North St. Paul and Ramsey County. Mapl ew000d's tot al cost for this project was calculated to be $465,240.21. The following table sumarizes project costs and establishes the proposed assessment rates, cost recovery from assessments, and municipal state aid funding (MSAS): ASSESSMENT RATES TOTAL $465,240.21 Description Street Water. Services Sanitary Sewer Services Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer COMPARISON OF ASSESSMENT RATES $249,760.67 $215,479.54 Feasibility Study Est. Asmt. 35.00 /FF Asmt. Cost MSAS . Description Cost Unit 0.05 /SF Rate Recovery Funds Street $205,006.66 3,120.7 FF $ 35.00 /FF $109,224.50 $ 951,782.16 Water Se ry . 4 7.0 EA 671.00 / EA 4 0.00 San, Serv. 5 8.0 EA 729.00/EA 5 0.00 San. Sewer 13, 739.20 554.0 FF 24.80/ FF 13 0.00 Storm Sewer (Ramsey Co.) 78 9 763-82 --- -- 78, 763.82 0.00 (Maplewood) 157 750, 083.0 SF 0.05 /SF 37 119, 697.38 TOTAL $465,240.21 Description Street Water. Services Sanitary Sewer Services Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer COMPARISON OF ASSESSMENT RATES $249,760.67 $215,479.54 Feasibility Study Proposed Rates 35.00 /FF 35.00 /FF 610.00 /ER 671.00 /EA 905.00 /EA 129.00/EA 24.00 /FF 24.80/FF 0.05 /SF 0.05 /SF The State of Minnesota has determined that $320,,094.45 of MSAS funds are eligible for funding of this project. The proposed cost recovery yields an obligation -of $215,479.54 of MSAS funds to this project leaving an excess of MSAS funds of $104,614.91. RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL -WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the city council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed asses. .sment for the Holloway Avenue Improvement as described in the files of the city clerk as Project No. 81 -12, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just: i NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part thereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 18 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January, 1985, and shall bear interest at the rate .nine (9) percent per annum from 30 calendar days past adoption of this assessment roll. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from 30 calendar days past adoption of this assessment roll until December 31, 1984. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments, 3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing .as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. ' 4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may be served by the. improvement when one or more later extensions or improve- ments are made, but which are not herein assessed therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the city by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements. 5. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of Maplewood Minnesota, wi meet in the Council Chambers of the Maplewood Municipal Building, 1380 Frost Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota at 6:30 p.m. on June 11, 1984 to hear all P ersons concerning the adoption of the assessment roll for Public improvement Project No.81 -12, Holloway Avenue, and to. adopt the assessment roll as presented or amended. This hearing is scheduled pursuant to Minnesota Statute Chapter 429. The assessment roll as herein described is on-f in the office of the City Clerk. f Area to be assessed-. That area generally described as those parcels abutting the south side of Holloway Avenue between McKnight Road and Century p Avenue. 4� L All persons who wish to be heard, or to object with reference to this �1 P 3 . matter may present their cases at this hearing, either orally or In wr itin No appeal ma be taken as to the amount of an assessment adopted g PP y y unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed { with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to . the �1 presiding officer at the hearing. 1E An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to M.S.A. 1 Eli Secti on 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City j f . the City of M a p lewood within thirty (30) d ] Clerk o y p y s after the adoption y . of the assessment and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or City Clerk. 'Under provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 435.193 to 435.195 the City may, at its di s defer the payment of assessments for any tould omestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it be hardship to make the payments. The procedures for applying for such deferment are available from the City Clerk. 4i r! Dated this 15th day of May, 1984. LVhcille E. Aurelius, City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota • 'Youi assessment maybe paid without interest from June 12, 1984 to July :1.1:,.1:984 at the City Hall, 1380 Frost Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota. This is an important hearing because this is your last opportunity to 496 ]-b heard on the matter of this assessment which affects your property.' 'If you have any questions regarding this assessment, please call the ngineering Department at 770 -4550 or the City Clerk at 770 -4500. Publish: Maplewood Review ' May 23. 1984 May 30. 1984 NOTE:: YOUR FULL ASSESSMENT INFORMATION IS SHOWN ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS NOTICE. _1 - 17 - 01310- L'C -76 ID. 57 ASS MT . N0. 5295 t'ARK RENSTRON' 181 C STERLING AVE N ST PALL MINN 5510° 1 ID. 57— L131C- 040 -76 ASS MT . NO . 52 95 CARL MILDRED TELLIN 2572 HOLLOWAY '."131T E c T PAUL MINN 5510 9 z ID. 57- 013.101 — 120 -76 ASS MT. f4C • 5295 F08ERT W RUTH F BAKER 25 9G HOLLOWAY AVE E :ST P AUL, M'N 55109 3 0• 57 L 1310- 1EC -76 � SSMT . N0• 5295 FRANKLIN R CHERYL M RICE 2610 H- OLLCWAY ST PAUL Mtn 5510c a A D• 57- 0131C- 180 -76 S5> MT. NO • 529 5 CENNIS J CARDLE J PEKRCN 2556 HOLLOWAY ST E ST FAUL MINN' - 551C9 ID. 57 —G 1310 —2 iC -76 �i SSrToNOe 5295 RCN A LD N FISHER 8 CHARLOTTE J FISHER 255C HOLLOWAY ST E ST PAUL MINN 55109 n1.0 D. 57 —C 1311 -2 L -76 SSMT. N0• 5295 FR At, OIS J JA`: ICE A REGINEK 252C HOLLOWAY ST E ST PAUL MN 5510 7 J D. 57- 0131L — 240 -76 S3'MT.r10. 5295 WI LL TAM W CAT HLRINE F. hY QU IS T 2510 HOLLOWAY ST E ST PAUL MN 55109 8 ID. 5 7 -0 13 C- 50-76 T 11 A SSM .NO. 9 52 RONALD R i 1�ARY ANN WARNER 816C IO9 22304 E3 ST PAUL MN 55109 F ID. 57 —fft". 1 310 -2E0 -76 ASS MT . NO . 52 _5 JC�1 tl R 6ERt:AD ET TE W I LD ES 1864 STERLING AVE N ST PAUL MINN 55 10 5 /Q iD. 57—C 131G-270-76 r- A .295 SS �;T. NO . NANCY M WELCH 1860 STERLING AVE N ST FAUL MINN 5510 °, I ro-0 Le-a Me 57 15Co -010 1. ASS MT . NO . 5295 JOH G SONCAS "T AL 19`0 STERLING AVE ST FAUL MN 5511c �z ID. 57- ASS MT . N • 5295 JOSEFH T KATHLEEN M WE ISS 1896 STERLING AVE N ST FAUL MN 55109 TI" / c D. 57 -75 9 0C —O E3 -0 0 1 0,o 57-3150C-020-0i SSMT.NO. 52 95 SSMT.NC• 5295 LOUIS C t P.A RI O N J SPIES " FAUL V t'I LORED M 19.5 MYRTLE ST HEMMELG ARN ST PAUL MINN 55109 1892 STERLING AVE N ST FAUL Mtn 55109 i ID. 57-75900-071-00 I 7 - 3315 C-140—D1 •= A S M ASS MT. NO . 5295 *N .c DO INA LD R VIRGINIA M SH5 R t'A t E L ROS E LLA E D OU IS T AN D E RSE t 2334 HOLLOWAY ST E 1856 ST ERLI N C AVE N c ST PAUL MN ..510 0 .3 ST FAUL MN 55159 /J� ZZ ID. iD • 57 -75 9 06 -0 82 -0 0 MT NO. 5295 ASS M 17-31500 -U' % 50-01 • TI PO THY M WA`4 DA M ROTH KE L ELAINE N 1880 STERLING AVE N AN DrE RSEN ST FAUL MN' 5510C 2324 HCL.LOWAY ST E ST PAUL MN 5510 9 /Zp ID. 57- 31540— OEsu -01 ID• 57-75900-093-00 ASS M T . NC . 5295 ASS MT . NO . 52 95 'THC M AS I AND KATHLEEN MY ERS IV AN G RO ELOFS 1876. STERLING AVE N 2314 HOLLOWAY AVE E ST PAUL MN 55109 ST FAUL MN 55109 57-759P'0-013-00 �-295 57 -75 9 00 —1 12— O C S MT . NO . ID.- A SS M N0. 5295 T. LARREL G L JUDITH J OCLA IRE 2378 E HCLLOWAY ST JACK R MC CAULEY ET AL .ST PAUL MN 5510ct 2308 HOLLOWAY ST E ST PAUL MINN 5510 9 i De 57 . I SSMTeNOo 52 95 t ID. 57-75900-1 AS..S MT . NO . 5295 CO RN EL L C BERG ET AL 2368 HALL WAY ST THO PAS R ANN L SCHLANGEN CAUL M 10 S S T L 55 23 OC HOLLOWAY T E S � � "ZT FAUL MN .5109 /9 t Zo • D. 57-75900-042-00 SSMT.NO. 5295 D. 57-75900-142-00 I SSMTe NOo 52 S5 WILL T ARDELLA G YORK 2354 HOLLOWAY ST E RALPH L OCRCTHY SMITH ST PAUL FN 551,0 2290 HOLLOWAY ST E ST PAUL -Mh 5510°. D. 57- 7590- iS4 -00 SS MT . NO . 5295 CIT of MAPLEW000 138 0 FROS 1 AVE - ST PAUL MN 55109 I09 57 -75 9 C0 -1'5 -D C ASSMT.NO. 5295 R EDI+ARD RIPLEY AND iR.ENE F R I P L EY 476 HCLLOWt ST t ST PAUL MN 05109 �9 ID. 57 -8 2 C 0 C - 010 -01 ASSMT.NO. 5295 JOINT IND SCHOOL DIST 622 NORTH ET PAUL AND .2055 LARPENT EUR AVE E ST PAUL. MN 55139 u , s NORTH ST. PAUL WATER MAIN r , -- . : C -�' '' 4 ''� -- --SAN. SWR. CONSTRUCTED THIS PROJECT Ly .OJAI .._.._:..._..1_..` a • : _.___.L.! +- _��..11_. � .... � I --- _._____ ' . ..1.�..::.._� '' �..._ -- r I 1, � - - ?INV r. r • -• aa .� �. , h 1 ,♦ i �. f T V 1-1 { t •.T i fit. 1 / .. �.. C;, <, ; ' :.:. (p / r'r -• 1 h 14 � o f71 • - 1 / eo t iM ri 1 � �1 4c 9 ♦, � i _ f � j I s• • �. --f ir R , . �� .y r .O.I•• -fir .�/��•� _i/w• 1 • .' , , , � . a .. - a � IA. At o pc a�.,p M•.M�� rw.rw. •M was. arn.yn M+u�fr M.r.wr • +r.r.r.i M..�w.. w�.w wrw�r. err +err Lm a � j �i .-- i - i.�i - _ __ i� +.rY.r� 4�r..�..r +ww�� tw• _... w.�w.rw .�r.rr�.A ��.� � �..�ft M�Mr� r.�� � ar..� .�•�� �I+r'�A� -�^ W I I l r COW E P N rl V4 eb NORTH ST. PAUL WATER MAI It rw t t. J � I r � .. � ,. I � + i) �' { I � ' �r i �' I �j ' 1 �• lJ(L ` r�. `�' ( ' / 10 I I + ( I ," I) �I� i�1 • i S �� , f � ( �' i 4x, 41 I .,? r�,r'• III � QI ^ � � I 1 • w 1 '�� /iJ t n 1 l ate' � �"� �: �. � ►, •, . 1 1 io._l .__l�.o _ ______ .1.. a L�:. ►._ _ �_ _:� L _1 1 .... 2 in t C l I A I - A 4y jw , F t , ZZO 04 4. ' ..7 ct ...r.., ., ♦ r ( , p l .+...... ....,r •r +... err. f : M , - ' I ) ' r n �', •' . <l ... •1 . .. n . . I I f 1 IV -. DIST 40 4 } s . 4 , TI E fN E Y r� rn v T 1 AVE. IF 4 • J FIR15131E AVE w ? cr 41A Ir t • I- /► M • , 4 If - . `�.. 4 c C O i l S i ( + � � � - af�Ml+1.��.�...J ♦ .►�►.� ` �. � r. 1 r _. z. X 11 �r � `� t � ( t. ♦ ' � � � fw : w a • ' � � ! � � 1 • , .. 1 1 � ` , � � � C► , �s �•., � � (' a +r ++ ++ ► ! ti I(� Mme, y A u 5� J t N �� 1,� Uj t Jt r �'.. 1.._:1. -- 4 _ .i_ . a �w{ 1 ' ±- _...._. 1 li..,.l...1_. 1:.__ f -a. _ .. _.._ J ...1 • 1 3 _..... _1 rl a _ _ . _ .. - 4, K=_ OF o t 1.11 . OL - .�.: I j 4 1 , KRESSIP 7 6 � � .-.. , q r T}ER N I-It C' ,,` 1 r • � �. Vt I r" t1 '`� o it. -o I V L C J IX., L uj •1 Ira .� � • ,' .+ n om..,., � � i i � ' � ' c o &*,-J M E A Do PA AA 445 1 f / • r • 4 i • ���� • ' C� _ • - 1 • � .. .�. - � �. � �► . „rr ..ice oi C, A I P L E *!a,;-: i: a ,\ ft4 V own � � ' v . � � ., •� � �r ..�..r1.. w..�u••F w.•.r w.. � �..+rir •+�rw .�.�. . a.....�.• rrr....� +..i.•r r....q. �i..n.+r r w�rr rr.r �.....+...,. wr•,. , ..r.r w....n. err ■.� rn.��� �,�„' w N h N I b I , . - .. 1 v . % % I : k 1, 1 . . t 1 i ' ' �` � � 1 � � t ' ~ ' � r 1 � i �. S [ .� • '` j .� � �• , f r 1 ± ;V � .Jl ._ ,� ��� + , 1 � r � �.I� ! �f Ir C j G 1' i. L4 i �...... � 1 � � .� ....,.1.,._ : 1 .� � = .. j._ � � 1� � 1 �� . t � � M� a ► 11 ` . � ' r ' � I • i .. .. r• s � � # � t -- - l _ 1 f . _ ••�. - 41 z -1 ta Lz I- w 2 6 17 06 0. L. • am • dIP we . . 14 0 w" 74f dop OR x 940 4& leY Zool( A. ITT • AZ ZI ofo 4; kale P* 4K 014 0 btJ c ' f i t 3.e5p %66 "m od6 SCHOIL DIST TI.ERN E Y �. 1 L9 82 AVE. cn ....... . ...... La I ;A 1 FRI 5 f3l E AV cr cr IF 0 f v I I I IP • AV x , o � 4r • 11OLLOWAY AvFNI_IE (EAST) mo. n,27r-'t; smuri r-. F. @ t 7-1-5. Of')#:) .7 SoNtTARY S W E' F.r--. 2- R 4 "SAN. 931,4R. SEP-Y. r_4 I 1 " I'll) I UP SM.N. @ t 6 71 . if - 13TOPM F7,17141-_P rApcFL NUM ESE R. *** .- I w- If, **4*41 4 V- 46 %1• 4 11- -W 0 4 5 1 r'nPLLL COVE NI-IMPER t-11_102076 5 7 C ► 7 I. 4 0 '1 G 57..(:t 1. t 76 P 1 6076 57 1 "1 C I Fi r , - 7I, t7,7 I" 17 10 1 -1. 77 STREET r.F. sis-LET ASSMT. R I f)f r1 nN I TARy 0 SEWER F.F. ("j. CIQO 2151:1. CIVIC) 95 . 000 SANITMY • CE ZEWER ASIERMT. J.) 5183; 20f) 4 "SAN. SWR. SEPV. tl, o00 7. -21 1 . On() i , 4 "SAN. SMR. SEP , V. ASSMT I (1 P 7. (14)f) 7 '9 . 0 1".) 729. 00C ' 2- 1 E37. 1 i"wnTEn SERV. 0! f I "WAIUR SERV. ASSMT, 0M)CO 2" IT, 00C.) 000 7 . f if GTOPM SEWER S. F. 95372. Q00 t "?F.355. Of 704 92. (w- C 6.7-16-2. O f 1f) 17974. STORM St-JR. ASSMT. 4791. 600 4 0 . 7 41 99 ,11 .'..750 15 w *24. 601.' P. j Clf) E399; 7 TOTAL ASSESSMENT I%. ft, --k, ., N. M. 1%, 1%, ^w 0%, 4791.600 2 C C? 0 . Cl (1 7 75 14 751 01 .8-C ► t F 7 F 1 ( 10 908. 700 M, ft. �v -V OV 0%, ft, 1%, -U ft, 1%, 1%, -. 1%, 0%, P%, 0%, 1%0 -V 0%, 0%. 1%. N, ti ti 1v 1. .1,, 'k. 1%. 1, 1,h • •ARCEL IM-IMPER. 4,0 rArmra- cm tii imp m 57--(Il -10- !-17 - I I t;_..'2 1 (.1 - 7 6 0t*.. '!10 250-76 ' 5 7 0 177 10 2`60 - 7 6 17, 1 71 7 , -,Tr,ErT r. r. Q(). 00C) 97. 171 70 0. fWlf-► 000 �11PFA_-1 A!19MT. f1 r;ANITARY C.3t:WFP F".r-. f, ► 00 000 (1. 4,100 c ono C'nN11MY SUCR A!;5MT. 4 " S-11M . !714r., 11. t1l"t'► f ,of) 0. C I'll-t 4 "SAN. "314R. T-•!"'kV. "WATER 0. o. ►00 I r-YERV. V . (.11 I " Wn T r r, !-,r r, v . n (-% r.m I C;TLIPM 1471CIR !3.1' 4. 0of) b5" /t . t17 1 15"246. )TORM A. 1 V5. 7cso 1 6 7 . 5 326. "17 4 7 6 2 . '77 tfJTnf-. n`i33ES9MFJ It 5 1 4! -: 790 700 5 If! 1.44.1 N, I. 'k, I to FIARUEL NUMPEP. 1 11 1 W. V v 4 -v v 1. �- t 4 A 10410111016*144v F , t . F*nF-IM:1.. CLIDE 1`11 !MIA P 500--( 150-1-1 - c- ; q t i vz r -- r r r . i 0 .. .1 0 , 4 1( )1 11 I'll l I "q, - I F1.1 r_ u I A!;!7) m 1 0, 0#110 (.1. I.If ►t-) /I 54f"I. "VIC, .-I )nI`ITTAP*Y 50-jur r . r . f If.1f,w , 7.nr-jiwNr;v , 0. I 0, f, if WI 1. t-Ij if I 4 " SAN. 51-lrk. �317PV. C), rs CI 0 0 , O . W f) if ►1 If *l Ff- PI.P. nr'�3m I . ►. ►00 I "WnTER FILPV. 0. 000 or m f,,.rwr_r v. rof j O t 0 r? 1. Clot.) I 49P, STORM `.44. 500 5/14. 5(.1") r7i /1 11 . .71 V) 1`5 4 4 . TOTAL ASSESSMENT `,14. 5 -1.. `,4 1-1 54 4 . Y 0 Ti 4 4 . �J 744. 5 ► ril`R4 I- ARCEL NUMPER. 4+f 4 17-- 17 V 'If I V V -W V V • 4 V 0 V V VIA V 10 V V IN'\. I, -w M. N -1 '\ _4 4 I Ar�C(7 L COLNE MI IMM.-R 5 7 - 7! __0CIf'i 11 AC 5, 7 4 I 11517 !tr (-)00 0 00 `7 1 (71 , t T P r- E, T r 773. Of7ln ►f-tf-► It 9 T I"I r- E T A!15 MT . h2 5 . 000 '41NITAPY 1331-MEQ F'.F. CI. 000 Of If') 711NITMZY !7,•1JER OC-,!,MT. 0.1 ..If-virl I I. f 101 • 1 104'.1 1, (,if In 1 ,• SAM - !;Wr, . 13F 1::V. 0!7 -VT . It I f It I 1 1 if if I i l, 9f if I Fj I ►if ►Wit J I I 1 I it ' I", I to is ► 01 % CI, if 110t_E U►JAY AVENUE (Eii` 1 i F=RUJLC: F' Nil. 11l IVtI. '�1 F:E.L1 F . F . L ! '� ;�. t..►t.,c. :�f1IJl 1 AkY E E:WE.k F . l t�+ 3 "4. tit-it) 4 „ aAN. aWFi.:iEkV. �' -, ! "WA 1 Lk SL- IN. L # ,;'J 1 , ,:►i it., b I•URM :.iE. WLR S.F. .: C. # i,, t :,,�, 7..Si. :►Uu F'Mi~CI_L NU�IE ►EF. * *,t * *+t�i►.�t *��5.. -•1 * * * *aF * *�►+t+c2f, 13 * *+t *�►► * * * *�/ 13 * * * * * * * * *•► d 13 .. +t�► *�t�r *.9 - -13 �t *tr+r *�t+rt ! ,l PARCEL CUDt: NUf•1L +Ek 57- 7i9Gt'►- 11 -i►c� 57- 7'j��UU- ~1 JC► �.•�.�-�� 57 75yVU ~14� -t►�.► 5 759u0- 154•-1:►0 57 739tJU-- iSS --tjU 57-82000-010- ST t - �EE't F.F. 1 �: ►U. U00 1 c7c7. t..►ut► 1.3 7. 4t)() - - 1 10. 0 0 0 , loo. 090 tjl STRZE T ASSMT. 3500. 3500. 404'19. i 10 ► 385C►. C►i_ ►u 3503. 15th 304. t; 0v SAN 1 1 ARY SE F- . F . U. 000 4. � 00 C►. OO �► U. UU1:► U. 000 10640. 00o SANITARY SE:WLk ASSM1 . • C1. U�JU U. t �G1a t,, C►i,� i ea, 00 U. GUt7 U• 01 'C' . 4 "SAN. SWR. SERV. U. 4C11� U, c:►t:►t;► C►, C►t : ,cj 0. C►uC► U UC►V 0. i►u�.► y 4 "SAN. SWR. SERV. ASSMT. 0.000 0. 004) 1:,, t - ►c - ►i! 0.000 0.000 0. (it)() 1 "WAY ER ;ELI %P. 0. 00t) U. U1:►u i .11100 U. uC►i► lu. UC►u 1). C►C►ta ! 4 1 1 "Wit TER SLkV . AU f . U . UC►17 C►.1:►�.►t -► 6'r 1 . i ►1. ►t:► U. U. Uuu G. 000 . . STORM SEWER S.F. ,5:5 000 . 2. t:►cl(► -, , 2 15b 5 -f1: _ `�. C►�:►t:► 6700. dC ►t :► 000 106-' '4 (100 ' U Ut7jU , 5079B. 0Gt► STGNM SWR. ASSPIT . 776. 250 7 76.2` t ) 141 1. 1 i ic;► 335. C►C►C► 53 14 TOTAL ASSESSMENT 4 27 6. 250 v�..ti•.���.�.1ti•�,ti�.•vti�,� �.•�.•� �.�,�.�.ti �.� •��. .h,n.ti�. .�,•�,^.�.ti�tiw�.^.�.w.�v�.�.�,� 4276. 2 6891.10 4185. 000 tiw�rtin •M b�M L 0 %, %p W %0F%f / 4034. 35 f•.^ �1�/� ^/ 111 ^ ItiI^/ ti• 13179.9t1U s . PARCLL NUMBER. 32 -13 - I�I�/ 1/ ti�Iti /11V•111•Vtiw/ti�111�/tiw/�1�� ! PARCEL COUE NUMBER 5 7- -0 131(.)0 10-5 1 Nol l oway 2 � STREET F.F. 325• t►00 0.000 y Si FLEET ASSMT. 11-375.000 0.000 SANITARY SEWER F . . 0.000 0.000 SANITARY SEWER ASSMT. 0.000 0. 000 4uSAN. SWR. SERV. 0. 000 0.000 4 "SAN. SWR. SEEN. ASSMT . 0. 000 0.000 I "WATER SERV. 0. 000 0.000 - 1 "WA T EN SERV .ASSMT . 0 .00 4 ) 0.000 STORM SEWER S.F. 70525. Holloway R - O--W STORM SWR. ASSMT . 3526.250 78 763.820 M TOTAL A85E5SMENT .' �ni..^. r11�. 1. niti^. 1. 14901.250 1. titin rhrn. nllvn. titilrM' b1n.^. 1. wrV^.^.^. 4h41. 11. 41r• r1. 1. h. N. nln. n... 1r1. 11'v lrnlglwn.^. 1.^. 11^. 1r1. 1ti^. ti..^. 1.^ rti rArtiM� .A.^.titi^.Arh.N^"Mtie%.,Uv0%.' ft. ou st, Nr4 4 y i ! 1 l PkUJECT SUMMARY � r HOLLOWAY AVENUE (LAST) PRUJEC) NO. 81 --12 DP NO. 5295 d: 81 1 . ASM 31 PARCELS ASSESSED. L TOTAL STREET F.F. * * ** *3120.700 @ * * * * * ** s5. 0 L.Acl1 TUTAL SIRELT ASSMT. $ ** 11: ►92'::4.5C► ► TOTAL SANITARY SEWER F.F. * ** ***654. 6 $ * * ** * *24.80t:► EACH i TOT(1L SANITARY SEWER ASSMT. 3 ** ' ' $13 # 739.20 .� TOTAL 4 "SAN. SWR. SERV. * * ** * * **8.0UC► @ 4.k ** */29.000 1:ilLlI afUTAL 4 "SAN.SWR.SERV.ASSMT. t- ** *563 .00 TOTAL 1 "WATER SERV. * �r ** ** it *7. Uc', ►C► (a 1: ►r * * * *671. 000 LfACN O (C)TAL 1 "WATER SERV. ASSMT. 4 * * ** 4697.0 ►c) ?DIAL STORM SEWEk S.F. ** *750003.000 C a ►►11 * * * *w1 :►. u5u E.1101 =TUI AL S FORM SWR. ASSMT. # * ** *"$116,267,97 I t , TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSL5SED $249,760.67 y i 9 v t CIT OF 74 MAPLEWOOD .,; 4 - - -_.�- -� - 1902 EAST COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 551 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 770 -4550 May 21, 1984 Mr. Kenneth Wel ti i n, P.E. Ramsey County Engineer 3377 North Rice Street Shoreview, MN 55112 ASSESSMENT -- MAPLEWOOD - NORTH ST . PAUL JOINT HOLLOWAY AVENUE IMPROVEMENT MAPLEWOOD IMPROVEMENT 81 -12 HOLLOWAY AVENUE Pursuant to the tri - party cost sharin a greemen t g g t of July 26, 1982, 2, the Maplewood City Council will hold a ubl i c imp R p ement assessment hearing according to the attached assessment notice and wish to advise you that the Ramsey Count share for County the storm sewer improvement phase of the project will be heard at that tim The Ramsey. County share for the storm sewer construction will be assessed at $78,763.82. Further information concerning his m a t ter tter may b.. obtained by contacting Maplewood Assistant City Engi -neer Charles Ahl, LUCILLE E. AURELIUS - CITY CLERK jc Enc. i .as • "i e MEMORANDUM f TO: FROM: SUBJECT: .LOCATION: APPLICANT: PROJECT: DATE: City Manager Director of Community Development Planned Unit Development (PUD) McMenemy St. and Sloan Place St. Paul Business Center (Donald Bachmeier) St. Paul Business Center East May 29, 1984 SUMMARY Re uest A PUD to construct three service commercial buildings, Project Description 1. Building area: 85,000 square feet. 2. Types of use: 65% office and 35% warehouse space 3. Refer to page 9 for the site plan. t . ..0 _ Action by Counod Endorsed.. Modified...________.. Red eete d.._._ �.- . --�- -- Date 4. This would be a similar use to the St. Paul Business Center constructed directly across I -35E. Comments The proposed use meets the intent of the LSC, limited service commercial designation of the land use plan. This classification is primari for commer- cial facilities on a neighborhood scale. Other land uses of a medium intensity nature, such as this proposal, are permitted subject to meeting certain perform- ance standards. The PUD process allows the city to condition approval on such. standards. This case is simi to the project west of I -35E. Both are bordered by I -35E and single dwelling homes. Both have neighborhood opposition. Both have similar uses. Both are adjacent to, but considerably below the grade of, adjacent residences. The conditions for approval of this site are modeled after those approved in the court settlement for St. Paul Business Center West. Considering the previous settlement, it is difficult to find a reason to deny this project when the access is better, this area has been planned for commercial use since the city's plan was adopted in 1973, and the adjacent uses to the south are commercial Recommendation Adoption of the resolution on page 11 approving the St. Paul Business Center East PUD, based on the findings 1 i sted in the resolution and subject to: 1. The following types of uses shall be permitted: office, servi warehouse, display, light manufacturing, assembly, whole -sale business, and one caretaker apartment. .2. Retail sale of goods, restaurants, and heavy manufacturing shall a llowed. 9 1 not be r 3. outdoor storage of materials or goods shall not t be permitted without approval from Mapl ewood s d of ft community development. 4. Included In all leases s h a l l be permitted at .any adjacent property owners." f 51 occupancy permits must new tenant, as required by will be a clause that "no noise, odor, or conduct time which will disturb or annoy other tenants or s. be obtained from the city building l d i n off i c i a g 1 for each the state building code. 6. Those businesses involved with exterior vehicle storage, such as vehicle - 9 � h�cle rentals or movin companies, shall have one parking space for each such vehicle in addition to those required by city code on the site. ' 1. The site plan, dated May 31, 1984 shall become e a part of the PUD permit. All construction shall be in accordance with this lan and the conditions ' p t ns �n this agreement, except for the following changes and conditions: a. The applicant shall obtai approval from MnDOT to discharge water from and i nto ' 9 om the on- holding p to the states drainage system. b. If construction has not begun within 1 years of this agreement, review shall 9 t, board be repeated, c. Site security lighting shall be provided and shall be directed or shielded so not to cause any undue glare onto adjacent ro erties or road P P roadways. d. If any :adjacent property is disturbed or property rons removed due y to construction of the site, that property shall be restored and irons replaced P by the ap l cant. P e. Grading, drainage and util ity plans shall be subject to the city engineer's approval. y f. An erosion control plan acceptable to the city engineer shall be submi tted tted prior to the issuance of a b u i l d i n g permit for erosi control during 9 construction. g. Parking areas shall be striped and all bituminous areas shall have continuous concrete curbing. h. Approval of plans does not constitute approval of a building permit. t. . i. All trash dumpsters shall be stored in masonry enclosures with a 100° opaque wooden gate according ordinance, and shall be a color and material compatible with the building. Location and design shall be subject to staff approval. j . All setbacks shall meet code requirements. k. At least seven handicap parking spaces shall be provi ded=at locations nearest building entrances. 8. State of Minnesota approved signing for handicap parking, fire lane, vehicle traffic and pedestrian traffic shall be provided, subject to the approval of the director of public saf ety. 2 90 All buildings shall be protected with a sprinkler system, subject to the approval of the director of public safety. lo. All roof top equipment-shall be screened according to ordinance. 11. Building design shall be approved by the community design review board prior to the issuance of any footing and foundation permits. Special attention shall be given to building appearance, parti cul'arly roof design to maximize aesthetic appeal for the adjacent homeowners along Skillman Avenue. 1L The city council shall review this conditional, use permit within one year of the date of this approval, 13. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or this permit shall be null and void, unless the city council grants a six month time extension. 3 BACKGROUND Site Description 1. Acreage: 6.8 acres 2. Existing land use: undeveloped Surrounding Land Uses ;Northerly: Skillman Avenue, single dwellings fronting Sloan Place and an -apartment fronting. Skillman Avenue Westerly: I -35E. Across I -35E is the St. Paul Business Center Southerly: NCR building, Sloan Place and the Parks i de Fire Station Easterly: McMenemy Street, undeveloped land and single dwellings Past Action -- Proposed Site 5- 22 -84: The community design review board denied the applicant's request for site plan approval. The board felt that their review should be conducted after the use has been approved by council. Past Action - -St. Paul Business Center (west of I -35E) 9- 13 -79: Council denied the applicant's request for an office-warehouse PUD on the basis of insufficient access to the site. 2. 3 -6 -80: Council denied a rezoning from F, farm residence to M -1, light manufacturing. 3. The City was subsequently taken to court to overturn the council's denial. The court ruled in the developer's favor and required the city to allow the construction of the St. Paul Business Center, DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Planning 1. Land use plan designation: LSC, limited service commercial 2. The limited commercial center classification refers to commercial facilities Zn a neighborhood scale. Heavy industrial uses, department stores, motels, 'e.uto accessory stores, etc. would be prohibited, while other land uses of a medium intensity nature would be permitted subject to meeting dertai n performance owl standards. 4 3. Zoning: F, farm residence 4. Section 36- 442(b) of the zoning code states that approval of a conditional use permit be based on ten findings. Refer to the resolution on page 11, 4 6. Section 36 -442 of the zoning code states the following regarding conditional use permits and PUDs : n (d) The proposed construction must be substantially started or the proposed use uti 1 i zed •within one year of council approval ' of the permit shall become null and void. The council may grant one six- month extension of the permit if just cause is shown. This require- ment shall not apply to PUDs with an approved phasing plan, Such s extens ion , shall be requested in writing and filed with the_ director of community development at least thirty days before the expiration of the original conditional use permit. There shall be no charge for filing such petition. The request for extension shal 1 state facts showing a good faith attempt to complete or utilize the use permitted in the conditional use permit. The petition s h a l l be presented to the planning commission for a recommendation and to the city council for a decision. (e) All conditional use permits shall be reviewed by the council within one year of the date of initial approval . At that review the council may specify an indefinite term or specific term, not to exceed five years, for subsequent reviews. The council may impose new or additional conditions upon the permit at the time of the initial or subsequent reviews. A conditional use permit shall remain in effect as long as the conditions agreed upon are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Any conditional use that meets the agreed upon conditions and is later disallowed because of the city enacting or amending official controls shall be considered a legal nonconforming use. Public Works 1. Sanitary sewer and water are available. 2. There is a drainage pond on the south half of the property. R 24 acre- foot pond with an inlet pipe from Skillman Avenue and an outlet pipe to I -35E is required on the city drainage plan. (See page 10.) Environmental Considerations There are no natural or scenic features of any significance. PrnrPrfijrP 1. Community design review board review of site plan 2. Planning commission recommendation 3. City council holds a public hearing and makes a decision. _w 'Attachments - 1. Location map _ 2. Property line /zoning map 3. Land use plan 4. Site plan 5. Drainage plan 6. Resolution 5 t 1 41 /9 JL W J J � W RIF. N 6 e • LITTLE CANADA " bU 36 LARK XVE.-�. I AURIE R o far cc 4 J OU RK E V. LbRID h I E AV t j -1BELMO LA, sELWONT O AKILLWAN �► IF o c < tr OfT. VIER AVE W Z vRNO I ° E 60 L-jt c �' W 26 AVE. W a o 3' ----�� o AVE. BELL + o z W O"PLEY AV E 00 a j z a S* KIN 1 3TON A VE. / PR Ic AVE. 4 0 4 � 30 57 58 6 ST. PAUL S LOCATION MAP 6 Attachment I 4 N dq 00 IL • �. t _ t 31 7 R ' 1 • _ D E ARS 0 / lo_ • t ..� 2; C ;1 2 3 4 A 11 t f DJR rut • . _ — — , _ ?D..3 5 ..Do = PLEXES I— , 0 — ----- 7 rx 1 �e� J ___2� - ?0�6 35 r Q _ •' .Q � I E ap • - _ . — t : <: 36_ 0 / 360 ' SKI L L14AN- :•'• iv's�' �:• • ': _j�it•s: it:,r•.; •:: i.��.:.. • ,;:•.'s:..�. .er TT, L + : • . .- L J • .1i.s. ice'.' .':......'t`. �`•l.t;:::•: /- - ST PAUL � 1 -�. == =: - .< = - e•f.•�:::: 1 — � •_ s � ; _. _ _ ° , •- S LAS l NC SS Y YY - : _ %:::; v`.;;. ;; ::: _ { E • 1 1 •� + _ _ ! ....... PARKS 1 Df FIRL DEPT a ilk zo •r: 's :T: : \' �::.•. � l�.'.• ::..� ;y.i.. '. 1111 t 1 a s - VER14C NCR � � �� � 5 't;E � _ • _• — UMM12Dais 3 01mu • _...� . R s �! — — - - — - f l + { Ad a - L t ROSELAWN+ o ' •• W • 1 I J9 *" A M L*�3I3 tSaLZ043ME-tLStlCiti;3g t M - - - - wQ% •- .. -,,.. ~ df •� �•� i dOo • qft • • r • -� ei • • • •. • . ! ...� _ r . •i1 - Sabel PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Attachment 2 4 N t Coun �i 6W1.-- = ma j or cE 0 S ._ t one t 3 r � 0 th� 0 I I'm TDzf V cQ ec act qp w — p- s 1 :min ch ange •_ - ajor collector- =-- .� > _t:.. RM s s ONWAR R 1 r�ir• � � t n• - - I ` ai f ir7 out _ interchange 3 major arterial - ' ' '' Larpenteur t " LSC j Rh o��� - si *aim a j� SC i Parkside NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN 8 Attachment 3 4 N t • 1 r gIV a_ a1C -- - BLDG. 93 0 C- 6 LOG. 4 —. z� } L _ •r BLDG, f3 We VOUCs Ch + t _ / north _ • s c ale 1 6 0 .3 PARKING 65% office - -277 t 35% service - 30 , required - 301 � r� provided - 313 ....__j C. G BLDG . A R S A S 37800 SF is - - 1 • -- t ` b! d p. f 2- 31500 eel bidp.i3 - - � --- W total -• 85.000 SF «• "Y . ST_ PAUL BUSINESS CENTER EAST -- voigt & f ourre inc. z 89$ architects d J revised 95130184 _ _ ' 14/12/84 a; _ _ _.J SITE PLAN 9 Attachment 4 Q N r... CIO i 000100, .01 or :: y ROSELAWN / COUNTY ROAD / e s r I I - r� JL II . CITY DRAINAGE PLAN 10 Attachment 5 4 N Pursuant-to due call and notice thereof - a regular meeting of the city ,council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the llth day of June, 1984 at 7 .m P - w The following members were present: The following members were absent: , WHEREAS, the St. Paul Business Center initiated a conditional use Permi t to devel ope off i ce- warehouse planned unit development at the following- described property: - Lots 1 and 2 Block 2.v Maplewood Office Center WHEREAS, the procedural' history of this conditional use permit is as f 011 ows : 1 . This conditional use permit was initiated by the St. Paul Business Center pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances, 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood .,,Planning Commission on June 4, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on June 11, 1984. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and ,.present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described conditional use permit be on the 'basis of the following findings -of -fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and 'With the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would - not be detrimental to the public health,. safety or general welfare; 34, The use would be located, designed , maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4 The use would not depreciate property values. y 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or d i sturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, �gene.ral unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 11 Attachment b 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking -needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as .:streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare` of the city. 90- The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and -scenic *features into the development design. 100 The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. .Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1.. The following types of uses shall be permitted: office, service, warehouse, display, light manufacturing, assembly, wholesale business, and one caretaker apartment. 2 Retail sale of goods, restaurants, and heavy manufacturing shall , -not be allowed* 3. Outdoor storage of materials or goods shall not be permitted without approval from Maplewood' s director of community development. 4. Included in all leases will be a clause that "no noise, odor, or conduct shall be permitted at any time which will disturb or annoy other tenants or adjacent property owners." 5. Occupancy permits must be obtained from the city building official for each new tenant, as required by the State Building Code. 6. Those businesses involved with exterior vehicle storage, such as vehicle rentals or moving companies, shall have one parking space for each such vehicle, in addition to those required by City Code, on the site. 7. The site plan dated May 31 , 1984 shall' become a part of the PUD permit. All contruction shall be in accordance with this plan and the conditions in this agreement except for the following changes and .conditions: a.. The applicant shall obtain approval from MnDOT to discharge water from the on -site holding pond into the state's dra i nage - system. b. If construction has not begun within 1 1/2 years of this agx eement,board review shall be repeated. -c �-_, Site security lighting shall be provided and shall be directed or shielded so not to cause any undue glare onto adjacent properties or roadways. d. If any adjacent property is disturbed or property -irons removed due to construction of the site, that property shall be restored and irons replaced by the applicant. 12 e Grading, drainage and utility plans shall be subject to the ci't engineer's approval. Y f . An erosion control plan acceptable to the city engineer neer sha 1 Y 9 1 be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit for erosion control during constructl-on. 3• Parking areas shall be striped and all bituminous areas shall have continuous concrete curbing. h. Approval of plans does not constitute approval of a building permit. g All trash dumpsters shall be stored in masonry enclosures with a 100% opaque wooden gate according to ordinance, and shall be a color and material compatible with the building. Location and de n sh g all .be subject to staff approval. j. All setbacks shall meet code requirements. k. At least seven handicap parking spaces shall be provided at locations nearest building entrances. Be State of Minnesota approved signing for handicap parking, fire lane, vehicle traffic and pedestrian traffic shall be provided, subject to the approval of the director of public safety. 9. All buildings shall be protected with a sprinkler system, subject �to the approval of the director of public safety. All roof-top equipment shall be screened according to ordinance. 11. Building design shall be approved by the community design review - board prior to the issuance of any footing and foundation ermits. S pecial attention i s hall p p t ll be given to building appearance, particularly roof design, to maximize aesthetic appeal for the adjacent home owners along Skillman Avenue. 12. The city council shall review this conditional use permit within one year of the date of this approval. 1316 The proposed construction must be substantially started within one 'year of council approval or this permit shall be null and void, unless the .city council grants a six -month time extension. Adopted this Seconded by .STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) SS. day of , 198 • Ayes -- 13 I, the undersigned, being the duly qualif ied and appointed clerk of - the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the 11th day of June, 1984 with the , original on file in my officer, and the same is a full, true and complete - transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permit y Witness my hand as sugh clerk and the corporate seal of the city t h i s day of , 198 1 City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 14 TO: FROM: REGARDING: DATE: CITY MANAGER .. W 1 • . CITY CLERK INDUSTRIAL REVENUE NOTE - SAINT PAUL BUSINESS CENTER JUNE 5 , 19$x. Saint Paul Business Center has made application fora $3,950,000 Industrial Development :Revenue Note to construct an office /service development on the east site of Highway 35E just north of Roselawn Avenue (west of the Parkside Fire Department). Saint Paul Business Center has developed an office /service .center west of Highway 35E north of Larptnteur Avenue and this proposal is .similar. Attached are the applications to the City and to the State of Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority explaining the apecifics of the proposal. There will be a representative of Saint Paul Business Center to make a presentation. a • • e� APPLICATION /AGREEMENT FOR TAX EXEMPT MORTGAGE REVENUE NOTE FINANCING This Agreement is hereby entered into between the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, -hereinafter called the "City" and Sa int Paul Bus iness Center hereinafter called the "applicant ". The applicant is requesting financing for a development project and desires that the City issue notes according to the terms of the Municipal Industrial Development Act of 1967 as amended. In order for the application to be considered by the City, the applicant hereby agrees to pay all costs involved in the legal and fiscal review of the proposed project and all costs involved in the issuance of said notes to finance the project. . It is further agreed and understood that the City reserves the right to deny any application for financing in! any stage of the proceedings prior to adopting the resolution authorizing the issuance of notes. 1. APPLICANT: a. Business Name - Saint Paul Business.. Center b. Business Address 600 Second Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55402 c. Business Form (corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, etc.) - general partnership d. Authorized Representative - Donald Bachmeier e. Telephone - 222 -3298 2. NAME(S) OF MAJORITY STOCKHOLDERS, OFFICERS & DIRECTORS, PARTNERS, PRINCIPALS: a. William S. Reiling b, Donald L. Bachmeier c. d. e. 3. INCLUDE A PROPERTY LINE MAP SHOW ING EXACT LOCATION OF PROPERTY, NAMES OF ADJACENT STREETS, AND DIMENSIONS OF PROPERTY. 40 NATURE OF BUSINESS a. Briefly describe the project proposal of f ice /servi ce development (OVER) b. Is the- project associated with an existing n Maplewood g p B u s i n e s s . . Yes x No If yes: Relocation Expansion n X Rehabilitation S AMOUNT OF CITY FINANCING BEING REQUESTED: 3 950 Q $ , 000.00 b. PURPOSE OF REQUESTED FINANCING: a. Business purpose to be served space for small business b. Public purpose to be served employment 7. BUSINESS PROFILE : .a-. Number of employees in Maplewood: Full Time Part Time Before this project _ 0 _ 0 _ After this project 250 50 b. Projected annual sales: $ 20,000,000 c. Projected annual payroll: $ 6,000,000 Be NMES OF: a. Financial consultant for the business: Towle Real Estate be Legal Counsel for the business Kueppers , Kueppers , Von Feldt & Salmen o• Corporate counsel: 9 WHAT IS YOUR TARGET DATE FOR: a. Construction start: July 1984 b. Construction completion December 1985 Saint Paul Business Center of App 'ca Si gnature o thori ze ep ti ve Partner T itle 13 /April /1984 Date the following items must be submitted with this application - D evelop ment Department: pp to the Eommun� ty Develop 2. A resolution :setting a hearing date 3. An application to the Commissioner of Securities for approval 1 of Municipal • Indus trial Revenue Bond pro If you have any questions on items 2 or 3, call the City Clerk, Luci l l a Aurelius 770 -4504 y , LM-00424 This Application must be submitted in DUPLICATE --- STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Application For Approval of Municipal Industrial Revenue Bond Project Min sota Energy and Economic Date April 16 , 1984 � .ne 9y - - -- Development Authority 480 Cedar St. , Rm. 100 Hanover Bldg. S .. Paul, Minnesota 55101 The .g i , ng body of Maplewood County of Ramsey Mi nnesot 1. 9 1 hereby appl to the Mi nnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority of the State o f Minnesota for approval of this cowunity's proposed Municipal Industrial Revenue Bond issue a� rec�•uired by Minn. Stat. 5474.01, Subd. 7a. 'We have entered into preliminary discussions with: Firm Saint Paul Business Center Address 600 Second Avenue South Partnership' Ci ty Minneapolis State MN State of - $ 'SU UTffff MN Attorney Fred Kueppers , Jr. Address 1450 Northern Federal Building ft' ame of Project t'i s Tian is engaged primarily a ed rimaril in (nature of business) Development of office /serv space. h e funds received from the sale of the Industrial Revenue Bonds will be used to (general nature of J ect ro ' : Acquire property and construct thereon buildings* to be P � leased as office /service space to various tenants t will be located in The total bond issue will be approximately S 'QT costs now estimated as follows: Ac u i s i t i on reconstruction, improvement, be tt ernent , or extension of project Cons tructi on Costs Equipmen - Acquisition and Installation Fees: Architectural, engineering, i nspec -- tion, fiscal, legal, administration, or printi ng Interes � accrual during constructi initial bond reserve Contingencies, Bond discount Other Saint Paul Business Cen East Maplewood, Minnesota 3 to be applied toward payme $ 290,000 3,. 60,000 100,000 _0_ 100,000 0 _ _0_ NOTICE OF PUBLIC. HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota will meet at the City Hall in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota at o' clock p. m. on June 11, 1984, to consider the proposal of St. Paul Business Center, that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter described by the issuance of industrial development revenue bonds* Description of Project The proposed project in the aggregate shall consist of the acquisition of land and the construction of 3 buildings, approximately 90,000 square feet in ` the aggregate, to be leased as office /service space to various tenants to be initially owned and operated by St. Paul Business Center. $2 of bonds will be used to finance land and construct 2 buildings with an approximate aggregate square footage of 70,000 square feet, to be located immediately north of the NCR building on Sloan Place. . $1, 000, 000 of bonds will be used to acquire land and . construct 1 building with an approximate square footage of 20,000 square feet, to be located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Skillman Avenue and McMenemy Street. The maximum aggregate estimated principal amount of bonds or other obligations to be issued to finance this project is $3,900,000, The project will be initially owned and operated by St. Paul Business Center. The bonds or other obligations if - and when issued will not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance upon any property of the City except the project and such bonds or obligations will not be a charge against the City's general credit or taxing powers but will be payable from sums to be paid by St. Paul Business Center pursuant to a revenue agreement. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Energy and Economic Development Authority, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together-with all attachments and exhibits thereto, is available for public inspection beginning April 24, 1984, from 9:00 o'clock a.m. to 4 :30 o'clock p.m., Monday through Friday, at the City Hall in Maplewood, Minnesota* At the time and place fixed for the Public Hearing, the City Council of the City of Maplewood will give all persons who appear at the. hearing an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal. .Dated this 23rd day of April, 19840 (BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL) By /s/ Lucille Aurelius City Clerk RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT TO THE ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT _ t AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT WHEREAS, (a) The purpose of Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, known as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (the "Act ") as found and determined by the legislature is to promote the welfare of the state by the active attraction and encouragement and development. of economi- cally sound industry and commerce to prevent so far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal and areas of chronic unemployment; (b) Factors necessitating the active promotion and development of economically sound industry and commerce are the increasing concentration of population in the metropolitan areas and the rapidly rising increase in the amount and cost of - governmental services required to meet the needs of the increased population and the need for development of land use which will provide an adequate tax base to finance these increased costs and access to employment opportunities for such population; (c) The City Council of the City of Maplewood (the "City ") has received from St. Paul Business Center, a general partnership organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the "Company ") a proposal that the City assist in financing a Project hereinafter described, through the issuance of a Revenue Bond or Bonds or a Revenue Note or Notes hereinafter referred to in this resolution as "Revenue Bonds" pursuant to the Act; (d) The City desires to - facilitate' the selec- tive development of the community, retain and improve the tax base and help to provide the range of services and employment opportunities required by the population; and the Project will assist the City in achieving those objectives. The Project will help to increase assessed valuation of the City and help maintain a positive relationship betwe en assessed valuation and debt and enhance the image and reputation of the community; (e) The Company is currently engaged in the business of development of office /service space. The Project to be financed by the Revenue Bonds consists of 2 office/ser- vice facilities to be located immediately north. of the NCR Building on Sloan Place and one office /service facility to be located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Skillman Avenue and. McMenemy Street in the City and. leased to various .tenants and consists of the acquisition of land and the construction of buildings and improvements thereon to be initially owned and operated by the, Company and leased to various tenants, and will result in the employment of additional P ersons to work within the new facilities; (f) The City has been advised by representa- tives of Company that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital cost of the Project is available only an a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the Project would be significantly reduced, but Company has also advised this Council that with the aid of municipal financing, and its resulting low borrowing cost, the Project is economically more feasible; (g) Pursuant to a resolution of the City Council adopted on April 23, 1984, a public hearing on the Project was held on June 11, 1984, after notice was published, and materials made available for public inspection at the City Hall, all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b at which public hearing all those appearing who so desired to speak were heard; (h) No public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly benefit financially from the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Council hereby gives preliminary approval to the proposal of Company that the City undertake the Project pursuant to -the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes) , consisting of the acqui- sition and construction of facilities within the City pursuant to Com an ' s specifications suitable for the operations P Y described above to be initially owned and operated by the Company and pursuant to a revenue agreement between the City P Y P and Company upon such terms and conditions with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary, so as to produce income and revenues suff icient to pay, when due, the principal of and interest on the Revenue Bonds in the maximum aggregate rinciloal amount of $3,900,000 to be issued pursuant to the Act t p A . to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project; and said agreement may also provide for the entire interest of Company therein to be mortgaged to the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds; and the City hereby undertakes preliminarily to issue its Revenue Bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions; $2,900,000 of Bonds will be used to finance the land and the facility to be located immediately north of the NCR Buildin g on Sloan Place and $1 will be used to finance the land and the fac to be located at the south - west corner of the intersection of Skillman and McMenemy; 2. On the basis of information available to this Council it appears, and the Council hereby finds, that the Project constitutes properties, real and personal, used or useful in connection with one or more revenue producing enterprises engaged ed in any business within the meaning of Subdivision la of g that the. Pro furthers the Section 474.02. of the Act, t � p oses stated in Section 474001 Minnesota Statutes; that the availability of the financing under the Act and willingness of the City to furnish such financing will be a substantial - to Company to undertake the Project, and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the development of economically sound industry and commerce, to assist in the prevention of the emergence of blighted and marginal land, to help prevent chronic unemployment, to help the City retain and improve the tax base and to provide the range of service and employment opportunities required by the population, to help prevent the movement of talented and educated P ersons out of the state and to areas within the State where their services may not be as effectively used, to P romote more intensive development and use of land within the City and eventually to increase the tax base of the community; 3. The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by the City subject to the approval of the Project by the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority or such other state officer having authority to grant approval (the "Authorit Y ") , and subject to final approval by this Council, Company, and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the ulti mate details of the financing of the Project; 4. 'In accordance with Subdivision 7a of Section 474.01 Minnesota Statutes., the Mayor of the City is hereby authorized and directed to submit the proposal for the Project to the Authority requesting its approval, and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide the Authority with such preliminary information as it may require; t 5 Company has. agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project whether or not the Project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by the Authority will be paid by Company; 6. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as .bond counsel is authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Project, to consult with the City Attorney, Company and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms and P rovisions of the Revenue Bonds and as to the covenants and . other provisions of the necessary documents and to submit such documents to the Council for final approval; 7. Nothing in this resolution or in the documents pre. pared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of. any municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a charge, ` lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or funds of the City except the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall the City be subject to any liability thereon. The holder of the Revenue Bonds shall never have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the outstanding principal on the Revenue Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City. The Revenue Bonds shall recite in substance that the Revenue Bonds, including interest thereon, is payable solely from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the P Y Y payment thereof. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation; S. In anticipation of the approval by the Authority the issuance of the Revenue Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Project, and in order that completion of the Project will not be unduly delayed when approved, Company is hereby authorized to make such expenditures and advances toward payment of that portion of the costs of the Project to be i financed from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds as Company con - siders necessary, including the use of interim, short -term financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds if and when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the . City; 9. If, construction of the Project is not commenced within j one year from the date of this resolution the preliminary approval granted herein shall be withdrawn. ' Adopted b the City Council of the City P y y Y of Maplewood, Minnesota, this day of June, 19840 Attest: Mayor City Clerk z STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY C CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I , the undersigned, being the duly qualified and . actin g Clerk of the City. of Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on f ile in my of f ice, and that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to a resolution giving preliminary approval to a commercial facilities development project. WITNESS my. hand and the seal of said City this day of June, 19840 City Clerk (SEAL) IWAPLEV4100 OFFIC . AIAP�.E!'yDDA JkiNlY. scAc ft., I iws to rttr ram • * moicArsi Blom Awoxv "rmr vzYom INr rRs rArc N1GNWAY INI l /1M/ O/ IIII AT l�0 LAII'� Orvf*#A*V dWA *,PAW le A'r«irroinerN.suwAr fRRAN �' _ —wo t 00001, ON y y a 1 1 •� . ' ty �r c • I I�II.1•. �...�..�....�...•..+..� •• .��,. /IC• 'r � ;7. `1 �1 ; ', - - --- ••�YL •'.�n`�.b• a --; _'; '_ it ;R..�;� °.. �• i If/ �i i t _ - rt0•a��MC A • � f,: 8 �+ ' :� r % iii' omc00 • !00.00 W.Mma In 4 IMP Q /,4/01.110 15#VdWM OMCURVIS ARE ARC A Klw�r� .� +w.V,V Il ,I �C I t. U ✓t R rr Action. by Ccuncli- : MEMORANDUM Endorsed Modi�ied - ..�... Rejecte ,.._ TO: CITY SAGER Date FROM: CITY CLERK REGARDING: INDUSTRICAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE NOTE - KINDER CARE LEARNING CENTER, INC. DATE: JUNE 5, 1984 kinder Care Learning Centers, Inc has made application for an Industrial Development Revenue Note in the amount of $x.00,000 to acquire land and construct a 5,000 square foot child learning and day care facility. This is to be located on teh north side of County Road D and west of White Bear Avenue (approximately 100 feet of Midas Muffler), Attached is the application to the City and the application to the State of Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority explaining the specifics of the request. A representative of Kinder Care will be at the meeting to make a presentation. :LM- 00424 -01 . This Application must be .submitted in DUPLICATE • ST ATE OF M1 NESO A ' MINNESOTA ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY • own . Applicat For Approval of Municipal Industrial Revenue Bond Project ' ta Energy T : h!i nneso y and Economic Date 9 ...�...r___,..._._. Development Authority 480 Cedar St., Rm. 100 Hanover Bldg. St. Paul,, Minnesota 55103 - The governing body of Maplewood . , County of Ramsey ,Minnesota hereby applies to the Minnesota Energy and Econani c Developmznt Authority of the State of `Minnesota or ap proval of this com�r�unity's proposed `Municipal Industrial Revenue Bond issue as required by Minn. Stat.. 5474.01, Subd. 7a. We have entered into a rel imi nary discussions with: Fi M Kinder - Care Learning Centers, Inc. . Address 4505 Executive Park Drive - • 36116 ` tit. Montgomery State Alabama State of Incorporation Delaware Attorne Briggs and Morgan Bond . Counsel y Address • 2200 First National*Bank Building ' Kinder -Care Learning Centers, Inc. Name of Project . - 'm r i 1 i ( nature of bus iness this firm �s en aged pry a y : Development o f child ) learning and day care facilities T he funds received from the sale of the Industrial Revenue Bonds will be used to (general nature of project) Acquire land and construct thereon a 5,000 s . ft. child • learning and day care facility It Will be located in Maplewood - . . The total bond issue will be approximately S 400,000 to be applied toward paymer of costs now estimated as follows: Acquisition, reconstruction, improvement, betterment, or extens of project Construction Costs Equipment Acquisition and Installation Fees: Architectural engineering, i nspec- tion, fiscal, legal, administration, or printing Interest accrual during construction I nitial bond reserve Contingencies Son d discount Other - $ 125,000 000 OOO U • ' APPLICATION /AGREEMENT FOR TAX EXEMPT MORTGAGE REVENUE NOTE FINANCING This Agreement is hereby entered into between he City of Maplewood, Minnesota, hereinafter called the "City" and 1(i aw A r hA hereinafter called the "applicant ". The applicant is requesting financing for a development project and desires that the City issue notes according to the terms of the Municipal Industrial Development Act of 1967 as amended. In order for the application to be considered by the City, the applicant hereby agrees to pay all costs invol in the legal and fiscal review of the proposed project and all costs involved in the issuance of said notes to finance the project. It is further agreed and understood that the City reserves the right to deny any application for financing in any stage of the proceedings pri to adopting the resolution authorizing the issuance of notes, 1. APPLICANT: a. Business Name - Kindtr — Cam+- b. Business Address Ex eC pa-r k oy(ve- o t* p V 4. �r N- � a b iw��c.- c. Business Form (corporate n, �partner� hip, sole proprietorship, etc.) - C 4 d. Authorized Represerftative - 1�2. NAP e. Telephone - 3320g5.� 2, NAME(S) OF MAJORITY STOCKHOLDERS, OFFICERS &DIRECTORS, PARTNERS, PRINCIPALS: a. b. (�; Gra,ss'ree V P C . `Tti.�s is a d. e. 3. INCLUDE A PROPERTY LINE MAP SHOW ING EXACT LOCATION OF PROPERTY, NAMES OF ADJACENT STREETS, AND DIMENSIONS OF PROPERTY. 4 'MATURE OF BUSINESS • a. Briefly describe the project proposal: 7o & A Goh v4 �r uc4 t ah v(' sk. S dtoo s# L4 O , C - (IVER) 6 �• b. Is the project associated with an existing Maplewood Business? Yes No ✓ . If yes: Relocation Expansion Rehabi Tf t ion S. AMOUNT OF CITY FINANCING BEING REQUESTED: 000 S. PURPOSE OF REQUESTED FINANCING: -' a. Business purpose to be served. To r., k.Ne- 44%- eX oKoV►% Ca�(y��sSl� b. Public purpose to be served. T, k +o ( ���u�eo� `� (' o vi ace o F ' ac! ucw'�c �Q e.. Oarca r t 7. $USINESS PROFILE: a. Number of employees in Maplewood: Full Time Part Time Before this project b o ' After this project K ID b. Projected annual sales: $ 20a BOO CIO Projected annual payroll: $ 65 � 8. NAMES OF: a. Financial consultant for the business: b. Legal counsel for the business: c. Corporate counsel: �- r 9-0, 6 • WHAT IS YOUR TA RGET D ATE FOR. a. Construction start: Tun e-. completion: Nov 4 P b. Construction com 1 V Ca x v\ m . Name of Applicant z x 4 . Signature of Aulhorized Representative S! ri �t e P I ` I Date 'The 'fol l owi n 9 items must be submitted with this application to the Community Development Department: a "a ISO 2' 2. A resolution setting a hearing date 3.. An application to the Commissioner of Securities for approval of Municipal Industrial Revenue Bond p roject If you have an q uestions on items Z or 3. call the City Clerk. Lucille Aurelius, 770-450 RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT ti PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA 14 INDUSTRIAL DES %ELC3PIMENT ACT nUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT TO THE ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT WHEREAS, (a) The purpose of Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, known as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (the "Act ") as found and determined by the legislature is to promote the welfare of the state by the active attraction and encouragement and development of_economi- call Y sound industry and convnerce to prevent so far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; (b) Factors necessitating the active promotion' and development of economically sound industry and commerce are the increasing concentration of population in the metropolitan areas and the rapidly rising increase in the amount and cost of governmental services required to meet the needs of the increased population and the need. for development of land use which will P rovide an adequate tax base to finance these increased costs and access to employment opportunities for such population; (c) The City Council of the City of Maplewood ( the "City") has received from Kinder -Care Learning Centers, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (the "Company ") a proposal that the City assist in financing a Project hereinafter described, through the issuance of a Revenue Bond or Bonds or a Revenue Note or Notes hereinafter referred to in this resolution as "Revenue Bonds" pursuant to the Act; (d) The City desires to facilitate the selec- tive development of the community, retain and improve the tax base and help to provide the range of services and employment op portunities req uired by the population; and the Project will P� q a ssist the City in achieving those objectives. The Project T+11 hey_ to increr se assessed val uat io of the Ci. ara - :aintain a pesltive relationship be ���een assessed valuation i-nd deb and enhance the image and reputation of the community; (e) The Company is currently. engaged in the business of developing child learning and day care facilities. P g The Project to be financed by the Revenue Bonds is a child learn in g y and d care facil t to be located on the North side Y of Count Road D, South of Highway 694, and West of White Bear Avenue (100 feet west of the Midas Muffler shop) in the City q and consists of the acqu isition of land and the construction of a 5,000 square foot building and improvements thereon to be initially owned and operated by the Company, and will result in i i y P the employment of additional persons to work within she new facilities; (f} The City has been advised by representa- tives of Company that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital cost of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility operating ibilit of o eratin the Project would be significantly reduced, but Company has also advised this Council that with the aid of municipal financing, and its resulting low borrowing cost, the Project is economically more feasible; (g) Pursuant to a resolution of the City Council adopted on May 14, 1984, a public hearing on the Project was held on June 11, 1984, after notice was published, and materials made available for public inspection at the City Hall, all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b at which public hearing all those appearing who so desired to speak were heard; (h) No public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly benefit - financially from the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Council hereby gives preliminary approval to the p of Company that the City undertake the Proj P ro y ect P P pursuant to the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes) , consisting of the �- ccLi- ' Qnd cor.str��ction of. facilities within. the Ci .% r s it -'Lon to Company's specifications suitable for the operations i described above to b� initially owned and operated by t e I . n Y and p ursuant to a revenue agreement between the City �� lio and A. CGlnpany upon such terms and conditions with provisions for revision from time to tune as necessary, so as to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal of and interest on the Revenue Bonds in the maximum aggregate amount of $400, 000 to be issued pursuant to the Act principal to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the g Project; and said agreement may also provide for the entire interest of Company therein to be mortgaged to the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds • and the City hereby undertakes preliminarily to issue its Revenue Bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions; 2. On the basis of information available to this Council i pp t appears, and the Council hereby finds, that the Project constitutes ro erties, real and personal, used or useful in P P connection with one or more revenue producing enterprises an engaged in business within the meaning of Subdivision la of Y Section 474.02 of the Act; that the Project furthers the ur oses stated in Section 474.01, Minnesota Statutes; that the P availability of the financing under the Act and willingness of the City to furnish such financing will be a substantial .inducement to Company to . undertake the Project, and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the development of economically sound industry and connerce, to assist in the prevention of the emergence of blighted and marginal land, to help prevent chronic unemployment, to help the City retain and improve the tax base and to provide the range of service and employment opportunities required by the population, to help prevent the movement of talented and educated P ersons out of the state and to areas within the State where their services may not be as effectively used, to promote more intensive development and use of land within the City and eventually to increase the tax base of the community; 3 . The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by Ci subject to the a.pp�-avl of the Project by t1.e Ililzn ota Energy and Economic Beve�.arment l�uthority or such �3y other state officer having authority to grant approval (the "Author and subject to final approval by this Council, Company, and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the ulti- mate details of the financing of the Project; 4. In accordance with Subdivision 7a of Section 474.01 Minnesota Statutes, the Mayor of the City is hereby authorized and directed to submit the proposal for the Project to the Authority requesting its approval, and other officers, and agents of the City are hereby authorized to • employees • g r provide the A uthority with such preliminary information as it may require; 5. Company has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project whether or not the Project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by the Authority will be paid by Company; 6. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, and First Corporate Services, investment bankers, are authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessar documents relating to the Project, to consult with the City Attorney, Company and the purchaser of the Revenue 'Bonds as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms and provisions of the Revenue Bonds and as to the covenants and other rovi s ions of the necessary documents and to submit such P . documents to the Council for final approval; 7. Nothing in this resolution or in the documents pre - p pursuant ursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purp ose. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or funds of the City except the revenue and proceeds pledged to the t ament thereof, nor shall the City be subject to any liability hereon . The holder of the Revenue Bonds shall never have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the outstanding principal on the Revenue Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any �_ _,_, .�..�....�.�.,�•�...�.�...... �- .�'- r-- .-- .. -• �--. �► •+�.r�' l.•••• :.rte'---- _......�..�- .. ...w ......�,....r - - - -- .� - ---- -- --- - -- �-- - •--- •- -- - - ronert of the City The Revenue Bonds shall recite in substance that the Revenue Bonds, including interest is p� *able solely from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the A. payment thereof. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation; S. In anticipation of the approval by the Authority the issuance of the Revenue Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Project, and in order that completion of the Project will not be unduly delayed when approved, Company is hereby authorized to. make such expenditures . and advances toward payment ment of that p ortion of the costs of the Project to be , f i.nanced from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds as Company con - siders necessary, including the use of interim, short -term financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds if and when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the City; 9. If construction of the Project is not commenced within one year from the date of this resolution the preliminary approval granted herein shall be withdrawn. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this I lth day of June, 1984. Mayor Attest: City Clerk d STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMS EY CITY OF MAPL,EWOOD I , the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to a resolution giving preliminary approval to a commercial facilities development project. WITNESS my hand -and the seal of said City this day of , 1:� 84 . City Clerk (SEAL) 0. z� VI W J cit TOTAL 5 ITS AeE& 39, cx 4' Is 712100. r--+ '0 .PAff 114 * VQIVEwtiY 4EU 4 PLAIG 90 U`MP AeEA pI PRO Po 5E P '' N; K IN VE C - W E Wi, o r . MN cc,t 1,20 Z N a o i } J x W t�A lr�r� a. Aft scatty Y � cats N 1.IJ , A - C • 140.0 COUNTY eoAv V ° a O o O A � 6LAli 1' + W-O 0. z� VI W J cit TOTAL 5 ITS AeE& 39, cx 4' bUIL VMG AQEA 712100. r--+ .PAff 114 * VQIVEwtiY 4EU 4 PLAIG 90 U`MP AeEA 18, o40 r . Z a J W t�A E v � Q V N 1.IJ , A o MEMORANDUM To: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: t APPLICANVOWNER: PROJECT: DATE: City Manager Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner Rear Setback Variance 1383 Summer Avenue Richard Jerome Kasmirski Porch Addition May 15, 1984 SUMMARY Request Action by Council: Endorsed Modified_.,. ReJ ected..�. Date Approval of a ten -foot rear yard setback variance. Code requires a sixteen- foot rear yard setback. A s is proposed. Proposed Land Use 1. The applicant is proposing to construct a 15 by 24 foot three-season porch on the rear of the house. The porch would be in the same location as an existing deck. There is a fence enclosing the deck. 2. Refer to the letter on page 6. Comments Staff would have some reservations with this request if the porch was proposed to extend closer to the street or the rear property line than the existing deck. Since the present deck setback would not be decreased, the aesthetics of the lot and existing site lines would not be affected, and there would not be any impact on adjacent properties. Recommendation Adoption of the resolution on page 7 approving a rear yard setback variance of ten feet for 1383 Summer Avenue, on the bas that: 1. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance since the present rear yard setback will not be decreased and the porch would not be visible to the adjacent owner to the north because his garage is between his house and the proposed porch.* 2. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship, .since the lot is narrower than a typical corner lot in Maplewood (100 by 100 feet) , restricting the size of the rear yard. BACKGROUND Site Description 1. Lot area: 10,720 square feet 2. Existing land use: single dwelling r Surrounding Land Uses _ Single dwellings B-19-81: A b u i l d i n g permit was issued for a deck expansion and ramp on the rear of the house. There was no permit obtained for the original deck. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 1. Land Use Plan designation: RL , low density residential 2. Zoning: R -1, residential district (single dwelling) 3. Section 36-72(a) of the city code requires that the rear yard for each lot in an R -1 district shall have a depth equal to, or greater than,'twenty percent of the depth of the lot. 4. Section 367.1 subdivision 6 (2) of the state law requires that the following findings be made before a variance can be granted: a. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. b. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under condi- tions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to r circumstances unique to his property, not created by the-landowner, and the variance, i f granted, will not alter the essential character of the local 1. Planning commission review and recommendation 2. Public hearing and decision by the city council (majority vote required for passage) . JW attachments: 1. Location map 2. Property line /zoning map 3. Site plan 4. Applicant's letter dated 4 -30 -84 S. Resolution 2 �KOHLMAN R AVE. W 23 ROAD "C" Y a J IE DGE H ILL R CT. 11 Dc ti V� t V DEMONT 4. AVE. ►_- 22 a4 p < G .i xv W �} SE X N I A / GERVAIS AVE. G � ANDVIE W Av SHERREN AVE 'E AVE . LARK AVE. v) LARK I AVE. 7 ee LAuRiE RD. = o t_AURIE RD %1, �s�u.aG it Y 25 = SA � 55 ° Z z 5a AVE. � 8U KE AVE l� ELDRIDG AVE. %`- PJBL I NELMON I LT w AVE . N > BLDG < a ISKILLMA K m AVE. _ NA Rts �{ 11 Q 36 T o ( .=1 LELAN C A lRQ-_� JUM TION AVE U RKE h CA H 1 pK W avE �a F•• R E( " 0-r"'r �..-- FROST 1 U J M FRISeIE AVE. RR I PLEY ; _j f0 P IA AVE X I. - � J Z o 62 ' W L A P NT rl 30 4t Ros WOOD AVE. [AJN � i t �►� - o #a � � a ! R_G� •' � � SV R 4 , ; W 2 W Wok C f% Q /� ---- p SOP ; �- Coke i _ = 29 = Z 3 z P R i 6 A GJ t t Q O AV F1 F1 n-r R w 65 LOCATION MAP' 3 VA 1 Attachment 1 F Q N • 1 t ! �• . �. . t t Q 44( slim fp Ar Ji or 1 1 �- 11 ��• • •..►� s ! L r a.. M . • 4 .. lb 6 _ �`■ j t ti f pa i, '► ''ti's:'" • ` i ` ! L ..� s 1866 + -S V V, W E R t� _.. • t,� t - 1851 r J I N\\ rw Ir — — 93 _ z .ti.. E 2 Z 3 r' L. IL r I it 40 L- A j i 4•+ f ' a a ir. -Rf L� .t I i PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP N q Attachment 2 t 6 foot setback existing deck PROPOSED PORCH a� a� 40 feet o m 30 feet- 134 feet SUM14ER AVENUE SITE PLAN 5 Attachment 3 w w 0 Q N * i qclwr���� - 400& a..I 001'-p / eu- I f 6 Attachment 4 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held i in the counci 1 chambers in said city on the day of 1984 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Richard Jerome Kasmi rski applied for a variance for the follow- ing-described property: Lots 16 and 17, Block 12, Gladstone Addition This property is also known as 1383 East Summer Avenue, Maplewood; WHEREAS, section 36-72(a) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires that the minimum rear yard setback for a dwelling be 20*/0' of the lot depth; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a setback of six feet, requiring a variance of ten feet; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on May 10, 1984. 2. This variance wa,s reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on May 21, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said variance be 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on , 1984 to consider this variance. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. Al 1 persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commi ssi on. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance since the present rear yard setback will not be decreased and the porch would not be visible to the adjacent owner to the north because his garage is between his house and the proposed porch. 2. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship since the lot is narrower than a typical corner lot in Maplewood (100 by 100 feet),, restricting the size of the rear yard. Adopted this day of , 1984. Seconded by Ayes-- I 7 Attachment 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY } SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) -= -- 1, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Mi nnesota, ' do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of ra regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1984, with the original on file i n my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this variance for 1383 East Summer Avenue. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1984. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota V 8 Ville NEW BUSINESS A. Variance - -1383 Summer Avenue (Kasmirski) Secretary Olson said the foot rear yard setback v request. ' Mrs. Kasmirski indicated Chairman Axdahl asked if on the proposal, applicant is requesting approval of a ten - ari ance. Staff is recommending apprpva 1 of the everything was presented in the staff report, there was anyone else who wished to comment No comments received. The commission questioned if there was a variance approved for the construction of the original deck. Secretary Olson said there was no permit issued for the construction of the deck. - 0 Mrs. Kasmirski indicated a permit was taken out for the construction of the ramp. Commissioner He j ny moved the planning commission forward the following resolution to the city council: WHEREAS, Richard Jerome Kasmirski applied for a variance for the following - described property: Lots 16 and 17, block 12, Gladstone Addition This property is also known as 1.383 East Summer Avenue, Maplewood; WHEREAS, section 36 -72 (a) of the Mapl ewod Code of Ordinances requires that the minimum rear yard setback for a dwelling be 20% of the lot depth; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a setback of six feet, requiring a variance of ten feet; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESDLvED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION thatthe above-described vari ance be approved on the basis of the following findings -of -fact: 1. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance since the present rear yard setback will not be decreased and the 7 porch would not be visible to the adjacent owner to the north because his garage is between his house and proposed porch, z 2. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship si rice this lot is narrower than a typical corner 'lot in Maplewood, restricting the size of the -rear yard:_ Commissioner S1 etten seconded - Ayes -- Commissioner Axdahl , Barrett. Fischer. He jny Larson, Robens, Sigmundi k. S1 etten, Whitcomb 2 5 -21 -84 t .&ction by Counci _l: MEMORANDUM End ors a r3 modified . $e j eete d.,.._.._�.._ _. TO: City Manager rj • f Community Devel men .. o tj� Date FROM: Director o y P SUBJECT: Plan Amendment - LOCATION: Maplewood West Boulevard, Beam Avenue to County Road D APPLICANT: City of Maplewood DATE: May 29, 1984 J F*R � . r SUMMARY R- The c i ty council, in December of 1983, initiated an amendment to the city's Comprehensive Plan, to designate Maplewood West Boulevard between Beam Avenue and County Road D, as a through street. Comments When this area, including the mall, is developed, it will generate more traffic than an y other area in Maplewood. The ci must give careful thought to a street system that provides the best traffic circulation and best serves the needs of all p roperty owners. The main disagreement at this time is between Mr. Korstad'and Mr. Hajicek as to whether Maplewood West Boulevard should be a through street to County Road D. I 'There have been four professional traffic studies done in this area, including the most recent done by Benshoof and Associates. Two have recommended a Maplewood West Boulevard (Kennard.Street) connecting County Road D and Beam Avenue and two have not. The problem is that as times change, the basic assumptions that go into these reports change. Assumptions on future land uses and traffic movements are intelligent guesses at best. To make a commit— ment to a local road system at this time would be premature. Mr. Korstad and Mr. Hajicek should be encouraged to work out their differences. The city should request a study on a s l i p ramp from MnDOT and try to p reserve right —of— way for this ramp until a decision is made on its need and feasibility. Recommendation Adopt general guidelines, based on keeping as many options open as possible, rather than amending the plan, because: 1.� The streets are basically local and do not need to be shown on the plan. 2. ' It would be premature to draw alignments on the land use pl arr map, when development plans have not yet been done. 3. Guidelines need to be adopted, however, to give direction to the developers in this area who are preparing plans. The general guidelines are as follows: 1. The following streets should be considered in development plans for the area: a. Maplewood West Boulevard from at least Beam Avenue to the - north property t l i n e of Mr. Korstad' s' property. Continuation of this street to County Road D may be allowed by the city, provided that traffic from Mr. Ha j i cek' s property is reasonably distributed over Hazelwood Avenue, Maplewood West Boulevard and a future Southlawn Drive. :b. A Southlawn Drive from Beam Avenue to County Road D with a slip ramp from I -694. The alignment may have to be realigned to the west to front on properties that would benefit from. the assessments Construction of a s l i p ramp is contingent on Federal and State approvals, as well as major land— owners' being willing to finance the cost. C. An east -west street connecting Maplewood West Boulevard and Southlawn Drive, There should be access to this street from the Korstad and Ha j i cek properties. 2. The city shall actively seek to preserve the right —of —way for a slip ramp from I -694 to a future Southlawn Drive, until a decision is made on the feasibility of construction. T 2 BACKGROUND Planning I Maplewood West Boulevard is constructed 260 feet north of Beam Avenue. County Road D is closed at the railroad tracks. The only access to Mr. Ha j i cek' s property is from County Road D to the east and Hazelwood Avenue to the south. 2. The Metropolitan Council recommends that collector streets be spaced one- fourth to one m i l e apart. 30 The Northeast Maplewood Street Improvement Study done by Howard, Needles, Tammen and Bergendoff in 1974, recommended that Kennard Street (Maplewood West Boulevard) be constructed between County Road C and D. (See page 7 .) 4. The Northeast Area Transportation study done by Barton - Aschman Associates Inc. in 1974 recommended the realigning of Hazelwood Avenue from Beam Avenue north- easterly (or the extension of Kennard Street as an alternate), crossing I -694. (See page 8.) This .street is recommended as a collector in the study. The realignment at Hazelwood Avenue no longer seems practical with the development of St. John's Hospital. 5. The Maplewood Transportation Plan done by Barton- Aschman, Inc. in 1979 does not.show a collector street at Maplewood West Boulevard, but it does state that "the intersections of collectors with the east -west arterials (Beam Avenue on both sides of T.H. 61 and County Road C to the east of T.H. 61) were assumed to be at least 0.25 m i l e from their intersections with T.H. 61, in order to pro- vide for adequate vehicle storage on the arterials" (page 40). 64 The Maplewood Transportation Plan also assumes "that no extension of Kennard Avenue across I -694 would be required,. since the anticipated peak hour traffic northbound and southbound would fall below the ranges to justify the construction of a bridge across I -694. Instead, it was expected that any northbound traffic could be handled on improved White Bear Avenue and improved T.H. 61 (page 43). 7. Hazelwood Avenue is planned to be signalized at Beam Avenue,but to remain a two or three lane road. 8. A plan from Ha j i cek in 1974 shows a continuation of Maplewood West Boulevard from Mr. Korstad' s land to County Road D. (See page 9 .) Mr. Korstad' s plans show a nursing home between the end of Maplewood West Boulevard and his north property l i n e (see page 10). The city has not approved any plans and has informed Mr. Korstad. that no decision has been made on the extension of Maplewood West Boulevard, 90 The Maplewood Drainage plan proposed a 21 acre -foot drainage pond on the easterly part of Mr. Korstad' s and Ha j i cek' s proeprty (see page 11). This pond would make it difficult to curve a Maplewood West Boulevard to the east. MnDOT _ See enclosed letter on page 15 T 3 Procedure 1. Planning commission Molds a public hearing and makes a recommendation to the city council. 2. The city council makes a decision, subject to review by the Metropolitan s Council for metropolitan significance. jc Attachments: T. Land use plan map 2. Property line/zoning map 30 N.E. Maplewood Feasibility Study 4. N.E. Area Transportation Study 5. Maplewood Center plan 6. Korstad plan 7. Drainage plan 8. Alternate 1 9. Alternate 2 10. Alternate 3 11. Alternate 4 12. Alternate 13. Capacity analysis chart 14. Letter: Health Resources 15. Letter: Mn/DOT 16. Benshoof report (separate attachment) T 4 • LSC i . RH - 'SC I 1 V interchan wa z r al r te al interchan - ---- V 0 - hts -7f L ma collector T_ J • 0 C —BW, 0 doom CD 0 1 1 A I OT P inj r e r Td a 9Z pjz 0S S E �1 ! . M -� R DS R R too# ot 4r— RB F' •; BW *•interchan inters h all Hazelwood NEIGFBaR�eca LAND USE PLP.fi (Proposed). Attachment One 5 R , ► _ i F. f J i = \�. R ] C^ am-Mai u SC . It ZT ' I � r ,y„ . RE - P E.S �. ~'" �S -ANN" ma 1w R M ma collector BW M 4— F - n ma rteria interchange r 1 4.11 J *;4 -F' raw rr� , - Mi ■ar■■�■ r ow •• r �•. tr �� I /�.•• •.j.• �'..."^. •.._ ..— ... 14 r ■ 1 y �► I•. w a N (0 00 •.> 1 / j I . +• VIKING DEVELOP& .. • •�tat�. ,�. R3 R3 CK R3'.' BC 3 Gov ftftr cl"R : �a_i sissssssai►sssssaasa COUNTY sarm *fsmHrjgROeb ssas■!+s �'D� �sssalls��esss■siR �sslsssa� sw saws sis� o 0 . 1. KORSTAD F Jf IL B C i •► .. ± .i t Z V. • i =� i ♦ .9ti�iLT_- ��•S.'�T -�,- - - - - -. _ j -_t - tit - -- - - - -- -- - - - - - -�- r �i_ _�_ --- - -� - - -- -- -- -L SUL � • .. • i • . f «w of r y. to •....►•w• �� IL- -G i ►�,_,, t ._f s ' '� --------- -- - - -- - - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- - - - - - --- -- Ml ' � � _ , » HO DAY �, .,• IL • r -: s� HAJ I CE K HAJ I CE K . INN -- -- -- -- _ �':'„'" .■ � -- J sss�sW.ia0aasasis &AW W7W2 is 1• f S a S >L,#= ii ��Cii>Li • SCHREIER .. - - HOMART • •� +�' t o o •• • - © •' T • - KORSTAD - KORSTAD i ; !_ f ! 1 : 1 .1 • •• N a t K ts MAW fil i • C SOW - • P�' t �� 1 - BC i • 1 , _ AMWW BC , • .. • i � � • • yr. � � • • rr ~ � F t - HOSP.I* L SITE - . • � OV4 ES ` e AT MALE OD. I , HOMART •._ • �.rr,►. its■asaE �s ■ aMEE/k - rfir�ss ate[ rilissssma ssials!■"s�s"■"isssitwmalnasa• F - sasWar- s0saaasa �.�• A �.• • • • •"'•o•• •••.01 • ago a • • ". • ~• .r 1 •b •... - r • � � � • • w •fir � BOW C B M . . *i� .� • S � �� ' w ain S *w.. � '. � aNrae ■ss. ar,sa■.sa► ■■�ars ■•• • 1 I I � i ' PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 6 Attachment Two s V s ,LEGENDS :.STAGING 6 li `h V s ,LEGENDS :.STAGING 6 NORTHEAST MAPLEWOOD FEASIBILITY STUDY 01 N Attachment Three 0=0 • To N r V-1 rr ( Not To Scalei Ni T.T. ►-m r -+ '" - N0. - e 1 0 0 1% .4r r. I; j , IL AU f i7A*J-- J. I .�;" � ♦ 1. • � • • ' � 0 11i e f It a b. W.. OQDL VQ b t r 0, A% .1i. ry LAk 001 1 1 -r ' 1 6 1 •. �� r ; I • 1 S T ri 6. f a or i 16 AW 1 . b 4 1 13EA LZ .4 of -. -V X • I it .0 -C" .4vK I tit f0plo" r" � --T 4P L Mr. owl tL , Ir .49 j nk , 4k Ais • IF ` ^ • , 4F arm- v , -1 -1 0 Tr Z . �•i r K q • • }•i' . •' 'to 4v - 4i lip 1 44 • r AJ L 7 X !7J ;A I % - co • Northeast Area Transportation Source: F i g u r e 18 -Aschman Associates, Inc., June 1975 Stud , Barton m :j rt H, 0 WILLIAM Be KORSTAD- BENSHOOF AND ASSOCIATES TMNSPORtATON pLANNING AND fNQ**fRlN0 CONSULTANTS TRAFFIC STUDY FOR MAPLEWOOD WEST AREA ULTIMATE ROADWAY SYSTEMS FROM NORTHEAST AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY • COUNTY ROAD D Cr. LIJ wi 0- • O Cr CC 4C w CD om "A f1w KORSTAD PROPERTY - r�z W-A w W I Z'4#7d HAJICEK SITE PLAN, 1984 9 Attachment Five lw I:: N NURSING HOME-60 BEDS CONGREGATE CARE ELDERLY HOUSING- 120 LOCTS RENTAL APARTMENTS 120 UMTS PARKING NU IN RSG HOME STAFF -50 NURSING HOME GUESIS-35 / CONGREGATE CARE -SO SIPRF ACE PLUS! j RENTAL APARTMENTS -d0 URFACE PLN ' FOUNTAIN gel i 1 ' Cs a CL I + I I c OFFICE -19.00 SF/FL IN I RETAQ- 130.000 SF/FL I PARKING I RETAIL -050 } OFFICE-325 O v MOTEL -140 SLOPE RUK T - I HOUSING -1 so ' c TOTAL 1345 SPACES --- - -- - EMOUS �' I HOUSING -120 120 Nf SING -120 TS �— / -- BANK v 1 O t SEflt•I E SUPERMARKET ° - 10.000 SF a n SERVICE COURT a FIOSPTT A OMPL ED AL OFFICE COMPLEX HOTEL -1 40 ROOMS �cL, :L C6 " "CE ; i CD , Ain AvenM � �\ 1 Q l 0 � t?d MAPLE WOOD MALL s FFBRU us4 MAPLEWOOD WEST o 100 sw 3w 60'7• _. _.. t ! Vt , Korstad Site Plan, 1984 Attachment six 10 4 N e COUNTY ROAD "D" V9660 TTTTTi • .... ...................►.........0 ..................... •.• ................�•.....►.. ��.• Te .L ....................... . ............................... ........... ...... ............................... ♦�/ .. ..... .... .................... ..............................S ........... ........ ..............................� ........... ......:Y....................... ..� .� .... . 1 � l � / i • j r � � � HAJ I C E K � ' --•'` � � � `�- s p l AND Ow �e 7 ! r t f `III `_ •ter `, r � � � r r r 1 a MAPLEWOOD ; MALL hOS P I TA KORSTAD 4 7 7 l / 0 00, f w - a MAPLEWOOD DRAINAGE PLAN • Attachment Seven 11 4 N .. ..- 'r� Mn1ww� *• p r t��0 •w0• * * 'r Mfr �• ;�• ., �. ,. .�..` �v • l �,.. 1 '� Y �, ,, ►L. - -ALA I -694 J � N c n �o rn J. r+ _ i ll � • ....• ...................6 0000 0000 ..• ..• .•.� ......... .. •...,.•.. ... ,..• :.....:..; •;� • :0000, f VE, . 4 • ar � x 4. XOML 1AN AVE. .:. .... ............................... 0000 •. .. ...... •.......,.....• 0000 .,•. 0000.. :... 0000• .., ......•..• .....• .. ._ 0000. . o ���•66.6 '•60.00• •.•••....••. ' ,� s'.••....••..• ••. COU RO " 3!� r •10 , • • b� 4 4J lz RAQAT J Wood, y n ox sEA _0000 mom `,% > r '< 3 W 0 1000' XOHLM A Approx. Sca l e WILLIAM B. KORSTAD• . TRAFFIC STUDY FIGURE 9 - -- FOR , 1 MAPLEWOOD WEST AREA ROADWAY ALTERNATIVES BENSH00 F AND ASSOCIATES 1 AND 1A TAANSPORTAION PLANNIHO AND ENGWEEA010 CONSULTANTS ii :�•4+ t r.•..iw •{ .w �►tJ � , 1 ►�� *•,' ��•�� 't'�' M��� . �•MMI/.� '",� • '��I�..��R•� •+'•i'q.��.���•Y,7���M'-�,��• �4•: ���•��� � �.�� • I f � ) - � � t , t NNW •;� ��iiiiir�r� �+�I�i S�r1 ^++� ► ira��v �I.r�rMi 1�rrwrC IMwr�rril I -694 w � C+ a C+ z U ja • now r•...��+ � ��MYL•.•.• •• • �� •......• � .:•���. • •••••yam • •,.,•, COUNTY ROAD "D" r%% qll%s Wood 1 ynn LY01 A z RADAT, • ... --a ammme dome cn !1 �,1 N A VE* a Ole b Ot Z `. XOHL AVE, V W •I �... , > c E 0 1000 as v n w KOH LMAH A A rox Y Approx. Scale WILLIAM 6, KORSTAD FIGURE 10 TRAFFIC STUDY . FOR ROADWAY ALTERNATIVES MAPLEWOOD WEST AREA 2 AND 2A BENSIAOOF AND ASSOCIATES tAANSPf "WA FION PLANNM10 AND EN0**EA*40 CONSULTANTS pr fir. +. ' """"""" T ! � ,...... _ � t t � ; � r. � � r.- t 1au �W i�r yam a� crt i.r• �.r+i ri► ywwr ;�wr 3A I 6 9 4 N C+ ris C+ rD • • • • • ••••••• •• �•••••••.••• •• �i•.� vE. 00000 moose a �o Z x fit• KOHLMAN �vE. r b c . E 4 dj +j �[ to CD V) Woodlynn, Ft LYaA 9 x w BEAM w 0 1000' • K A' Appr Scale WILLIAM B. KORSTAD TRAFFIC STUDY FIGURE 11 FOR MAPLEWOOD WEST AREA ROADWAY ALTERNATIVES BENSHOOF AND ASSOCIATES 3 AND 3A TRANSPOWAT" PLANN04Q ANO f?J0**FA1H0 CONSULTANTS , ••............ .... •••............ •. ... �r.1�iYM�..� •...... ..••......... .,•� .•,.••;.......�I • ••...•. COUNTY R0 0 D" �" .. p.t �R.t «. y. r•. `� .,, t�.r.� �' •�+w A� • •. 1AP►••'.y fit) .'• 1:. + �. �.p r r� r , +I �.�. ��1. T __ • , �' .r.. .'� t �! tea, , ` 1 . r i • 1 • 1 I f r ° I494 n C+ r+ J 04 0 0 0 00 • i • •••• •• .•• •••••• ••••• �. • :•�•••.•t• • -- AVE* 4A . mow• ••A• ,•• _ C OUNT Y ROAD "a" i3 swap= ammumm 00000 • a ' ar 4J o � 3 V N 4. XOMLMAN AVE. z Ell 41 4J >rC N CD Wood 1 y nn , Ft LY01 41 r e) C a k v x M v REAM j . N 4� •'" w 0 1000' xOHLMAN A' App . Scal WILLIAM B. KORSTAD TRAFFIC STUDY FIGURE 12 FOR MAPLEWOOD WEST AREA ROADWAY ALTERNTA I VES 13ENSHOOF AND ASSOCIATES 4 AND 4A TRANSPORTATION PLANNINO ANO ENGINEERINO CONSULTANTA • ROAD ~ D� r . t V o 4J • cc vs • o z o k ►• X AVE. _ M a z ' R A AT in L �. 4� � � T t-: .•c 6M c E 0 PP ■ _ T ALTERNATIVE 5A Attachment twelve 16 4 N CAPACITY ANALYSIS FOR INTERSECTIONS ON SEAM AVENUE Z A summary descr of each - y p h Leve] of service � s as follows: . a Level of service A describes a condition of free flow, with high speeds, g Traffic density. is low, with speeds controlled by driver desires, speed l imits and physical roadway conditions. Little or no delay experienced, i s a Level of service 8 is in the zone of stable flow, with operating speeds eginning to be restricted somewhat by traffic conditions. Drivers still have reasonable freedom to select their , speed and lane of operation. The l ower limit of this level of service has been associated with service volumes used in the design of rural highways. • Level of service C is still in the zone of stable flow, but speeds and maneuverability are more closely controlled by the higher volumes. Most of the drivers are restricted in their freedom to select their own speed, change lanes or pass.. This level of service often is used for urban design prac- tice. • Level of service D approaches unstable flow, with tolerable operating speeds being maintained though considerably affected by changes in operating con- ditions. Fluctuations in volume and temporary restrictions to flow may cause substantial drops in operating speeds. Drivers have little freedom to maneuver, and comfort and convenience are low. 9 Level of service E cannot be described by speed alone., but represents opera- . P t i ons at even lower operating speeds than in level D, with volumes at or near the capacity of the highway. Flow is unstable, and there may be stoppages of momentary duration. • Level of service F describes forced flow operation at low speeds -, where volu- mes are below capacity. .Speeds are reduced substanti and stoppages may occur for short or long periods of time because of the downstream congestion. - In the extreme, both speed and volume can drop to zero. 17 "= Attach len-- Volume to Capacity Ratio During P.M. Peak Hour and Level of Service by Intersectionl Alternative Beam & Hazelwood Beam &Maplewood West Beam & Southlawn 1 1.19 (E) 1.26 (F) 0.87 (A) 1a 1.11 (0) 1.05 (D) 0.87 (A) 2a 100 (C) 0.85 (A) 1.12 (D) 3a 100 (C) 0.45 (C) 0099 (C) 4a 0.49 (C)' 0.98 (C) 0.96 (C) 5a 0.98 (C; 1.20 (E) 1.20 (E) Z A summary descr of each - y p h Leve] of service � s as follows: . a Level of service A describes a condition of free flow, with high speeds, g Traffic density. is low, with speeds controlled by driver desires, speed l imits and physical roadway conditions. Little or no delay experienced, i s a Level of service 8 is in the zone of stable flow, with operating speeds eginning to be restricted somewhat by traffic conditions. Drivers still have reasonable freedom to select their , speed and lane of operation. The l ower limit of this level of service has been associated with service volumes used in the design of rural highways. • Level of service C is still in the zone of stable flow, but speeds and maneuverability are more closely controlled by the higher volumes. Most of the drivers are restricted in their freedom to select their own speed, change lanes or pass.. This level of service often is used for urban design prac- tice. • Level of service D approaches unstable flow, with tolerable operating speeds being maintained though considerably affected by changes in operating con- ditions. Fluctuations in volume and temporary restrictions to flow may cause substantial drops in operating speeds. Drivers have little freedom to maneuver, and comfort and convenience are low. 9 Level of service E cannot be described by speed alone., but represents opera- . P t i ons at even lower operating speeds than in level D, with volumes at or near the capacity of the highway. Flow is unstable, and there may be stoppages of momentary duration. • Level of service F describes forced flow operation at low speeds -, where volu- mes are below capacity. .Speeds are reduced substanti and stoppages may occur for short or long periods of time because of the downstream congestion. - In the extreme, both speed and volume can drop to zero. 17 "= Attach len-- St.John's H ospital s"" Providing Family- Centered Health Care 0 Hp r J - 1 r ` , 1984 Maplewood City Planning Commission 1 3:� B § ") Frost siven ue Mir 1 e ood , Minnesota Re Map). ewc. West Street I mpr s /Ci ty P I an Amendr.iert t Comm i s ., i ern er s : Heal th R es our' e s I n . tai:. shes to reg:. ster the + of 1 o: =J+ n s a te me, n Vji t rerQ a rd to ro c -� i rrprov ements in the Maplewood Writ ar ea— �;e�:1 tit :e �.�ress i r:c . opposes -ny plan t does no 3. nc ? ��de t :e I -L9 sI i p ramp , esDec i cal 1 y a plan an that V11cf ; 1 d r es� t o: • i r. the :: t e:. s 1 on G� i�sa.�� 1 X1.1 {..;od �iZez`�t o... a e��arc -� r aam to Cc3u:-s•t .: Rct ad D . HPI I 'i i c};� _ ri �� t o b e b 1 1. Li e r =t t. r r-, a c i i �*' 2 r. �;; c t r 1 . _ -' h 3 a n a - 1 .0 w h e L + i � .'. t� s � a t. C� r � � L: '�i. :': 5 a. ,�".. �! �. � � � � o r � t r � e i L. a r Q • . 1' d w1 o } 1 r g } -_ •t C C J • e f! + in 2 's C_ CD r S crt: 30rI H R I stronQ tit..'ppo3�tSr �t sen �. de qr`t ti nq South? wn as the col 1 e` cor street prcivideff a. publi st reet connect •�-r u ev &F _d to S r Guth' awn i S r!r C ded Lo ..a 'L i f -� �1 :1 c _ .` , : a s i t ends o s the ni edi cal -ramp) I :. �- -� bfi 3. i eve. - ' s b. t i n te rests wt 11 not be c --r :red b%',! the noY e::ten� ion o0. tIap? enwoad 1��;�st ioLl °�•�.:'"d to County F:oa.d D. La4e &.j . -, - �•-- �, .J C�•t't .: d ' 'at 1 oI't '� oU4r I E ?Ctl` =t.. t r . i P . Ei R IC3,C= PPCj -- f Ill St. Jc hns Ho =p i tal 403 Maria Avenue • St. Paul, Minnesota 55106 A Service of Health Resources, Inc Attachment Fourteen (612) 228 -3600 18 N ES p 11 0 l OF T fk Nifinriesola. Dc 1_)ar1n - )('& 1 (A T I "ansl. molaI10ll Disirici 9 3485 Hadlev Avellue Norlh. Box '&FW>W050 Norlh S1. Paul, N inneso la 55 May 9, 1984 Mr. Geoff Olson Planning Director City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Geoff: Telephone 779 -1210 As you requested at our April 18 meeting, I am writing to outline the District's reaction to your I -694 /White Bear Avenue eastbound offramp modification proposal. These comments are based on the concept, drawn by us, of which you have a copy, that shows bringing the ramp . off of eastbound I -694 just east of the Burlington Northern bridge, allowing a slip ramp off to County I'D" at proposed Southlawn Drive, and having the ramp exit onto White Bear Avenue as it does presently. We do have reservations regarding this proposal. From a design perspective the ramp is too long (3500 feet) , slip ramps are not common to the Interstate system, "signing" the various movements would be a problem, and slip ramp maintenance would be inefficient (costly). This unusual design may prove to be unsafe, and is not consistent with Mn /DOT and Federal Highway Administration policy to pro- vide uniform interchange configurations, From a capacity perspective the proposed ramp modification may not be needed. If the ramp termini intersections of I -694 and White Bear Avenue reach unaccept- able levels of service, there remain other, more standard and less costly, congestion remedies. From a planning perspective the proposed modification is not needed if its purpose is to correct local access and /or capacity deficiencies created by a lack of a suitable local street support system or by excessive access to adjacent land par- cels. Ameliorating local transportation problems via Interstate modifications is not thought to be appropriate . Finally, from a costs and priorities perspective, if the ramp modification was to be constructed, it is likely that the City would need to provide the necessary rights of way needed as well as the approximately three quarters of a million •dollar construction costs (a very rough estimate). If the City wishes to further pursue this proposal I suggest that you formally ask Mn /DoT (request of our District Engineer, Kermit McRae) to' in a joint study. Such a study would likely entail design and other activities aimed at getting approvals from Mn /D0T and the Federal Highway Administration, and, possibly, from the Metropolitan Council, Attachment 15 An Equal Ornuriunit i E:rnplo er I would be happy to go fiver these reservations and procedures with you in more detail if you like. Please keep me informed of the status of your proposal. Sincerely, . 'J erry � k S el ton District Planning Coordinator T 20 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1380 FROST AVENUE, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MONDAY, APRIL 2, 1984, 7:30 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Axdahl called the. meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Commissioner L Lester Axdahl P Present (Chairman) III, APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. March 19, 1984 Correct: page 4, add item #5 "The proposed change is consistent with the comprehensive plan, specifically page 18 -29 which permits an occasional double dwelling in an RL, residential lower density area." Commissioner Whitcomb moved approval of the minutes of March 19, 1984 as corrected. Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Ell of son, Fischer, Pel l i sh, Si gmundi k, Whitcomb. Abstained -- Commissioners Robens and Sletten HIV, APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Whitcomb moved approval of the agenda as submitted. Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl,' Barrett, E 1 l of son, Fischer, Pel l i sh, Robens, Si gmund i k, Sletten, Whitcomb V. PUBLIC HEARING A. Plan Amendment -- Maplewood West Boulevard Secretary Olson read the notice of public hearing. The request is to amend the city's Comprehensive Plan, to designate Maplewood West Boulevard between Beam Avenue and County Road D, as a through street. Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment on the proposal, R • Hamilton Luther, pres i dent of Tousle Development y Corporation, property is located between County Road D and Highway 694, asked if the slip ramp would be state highway roadway or city roadway. PIrector of Public Works Haider said the ramp would more than likel MnDOT facility, although they may want financial partipati on on the city s part. It would be part of the interstate system. The commission questioned why the slip ramp.is suggested. Secretary Olson said one of the main reasons would to relieve some of the traffic from White Bear Avenue and direct it onto Southl awn. Director Haider indicated that modifications would be done to the intersection of White Bear and County Road D this year and the configuration w i l l somewhat change along with installation of traffic signals. Secretary Olson said that County Road D could be used as the slip ramp for 694. The Highway Department wished to have some indication of interest by the city and then study it and look at a number of alternatives. Ken Bouser, 1765 E. County Road D, said the slip ramp would affect his property. He lots property for the construction of the freeway and also for the widening of County Road D. He is opposed to the slip ramp as it wou.l d take too much of his property. William Korstad, 20 Red Fox Road, said the proposed H plan is not one of their alternatives. They have submitted a number of alternatives. They do not wish to have their name on something that they have not proposed. They are opposed to extension of Maplewood West Boulevard. They have hired a traffic engineer to propose roadway alignment routes. He presented an up —to —date plan to the commission for consideration. They had proposed to construct a nursing home in 1983, however the legislature froze all nursing home construction for three years. If they do intend to construct the nursing home it will be installed further to the west and in conjuction with the hospital property. They have proposed to construct apartment buildings (3) in this particular location. He gave background on his-property and the adjacent property. The slip ramp would cover part of his property and part of Ha j i cek property. They feel the main road is necessary to connect Southlawn into the freeway or a s l i p off the freeway to Beam Avenue. He feels that if Maplewood West is extended into Hajice.k property and he has the use of Beam 'Avenue and bridge he should be assessed as he was not assessed for the previous road improvements of Beam Avenue. They intend also _ to - install private roads and after construction dedicate them to the city y so they become public roadways.. 2 4 -2 -84 Jim Benshoof, traffic engineering consultants r proposed to do a comprehensive traffic analysis and address the needs from a traffic access circulation standpoi ng for the .Korstad property. Also look at those needs for other properties in the area. He reviewed the staff report and various alternatives for street alignment. The y do not recommend Southlawn Drive and slip ramp as the best solution. He does question if alternative 5a will meet . the demands required, He reviewed each alternative street alignment and what results would ` be from that alternative. To highlight their recommendations, date ons, the concerns of having Maplewood West as a through collector, it would not be able to connect to the new slip ramp from 694. It is not possible to move it that far to the west as there would not be adequate leading distance on 694. Maplewood West would not provide an real y 'opportunity of relieve to White Bear Avenue, which is at maximum capacity. They recommend that Southlawn Drive be designated on the Comprehensive Plan as a collector roadway. It would provide the direct connection with the exit ramp. The city should. pursue with MnDot the opportunity to provide the new exit ramp. They y would suggest the sketch shown in the Northeast Area Study. .Terry Boland, Hamel, Green and Abramson, architects and engineers said that Jim Goul et, civil engineer is also with him. He wished to comment relative to the proposed development on the Korstad ro e rt P P y that is reinforced by the Benshoof study. Alternative 4a appears to balance the traffic access to Beam Avenue. He commented on the street alignment and the benefits to abutting property. The y took into consideration existing development in the area and also future develop- ment when planning roadway alignments. They planned the area so that l i k e uses are grouped together, uses that should be separated are and consequently the roadway as they planned, zones the property. Jim Goulet, civil engineer with Hamel, Green and Abramson, said the pond is 21 acre feet of storage which is based on 100 year storm event. He did not think the storage pond would be a barrier to a roadway system. There would be no problem with construction of this pond. Mr. Korstad said they tried to make a comprehensive study of the proposed roadway system so the city would have a copy of the study as it should have been done. If Maplewood West Boulevard is extended to County Road D he will not construct the 6 -story office building because of the possible traffic situation that can occur at Beam and Maplewood West Boulevard., He cannot take the chance of losing tenants. He probably would not build one of the three apartment buildings which are seven stories high. The traffic from a commercial area through the residential area may affect his tenants. If the property is going to be split up then they may just construct anything possible. They request the plan be amended to put in the slip ramp and Southlawn extension. He thought Southlawn would be a lot easier to finance. -Gene Wilson, resident of White Bear Lake and has been working with Bob Hajicek on the development of his property. He commented on the Beam Avenue assessments. There are a l s o assessments being paid for the development of County Road D. There was nothing in the report that spoke to how the traffic would be affected when the Highway 61/694 interchange is completed. Also it is proposed to upgrade Berkley in White Bear Lake and this would relieve some of the traffic from White Bear Avenue. He also questioned if there would be a problem with the develop- 3 4 -2 -84 ment of the Ha j i cek property with the construction of Southlawn Drive and the slip ramp. This would supply added traffic to his property. He indicated their architect. Eldon Morrison would be glad to answer questions regarding the proposed development on the land. Mr. Morrison said he has been working with Mr. Haj for a short time on this proposal. They wish to work with the land and utilize the hills and valleys and ponds. They are proposing a commerci servi area, commercial retail area, a housing area and an office area. They have prospects for the properties. There are no final plans for the property. This property should not be blocked off from easy access to the south and would enc the commission to make a good decision. He thought the 1 ocati on . of the slip ramp should definitely be determined by the state before any final decisions are made on the local roadways. Bill Knutson, representing Health Resources, specifically St. John's Hospital, they oppose any plan that does not include the I - 694 s ramp, especially a plan that would result only in the extension of Maplewood West Boul evard. from Beam Avenue to County Road D. They believe the slip ramp is more likely to be constructed if the city designates Southlawn as a collector street and amends the city plan accordingly and works towards its construction. They support the plan amendment to designate Southlawn as a collector street provided a public street connection from Maplewood West Boulevard to Southlawn is provided to satisfy the access needs fo the medical campus. Their best interest wi ll not be served by the northerly extension of Maplewood West Boulevard to County Road D. Alver Jones, representing a resident of County Road D. questioned why an extension of Maplewood West Boulevard is not going to benefit Health Resources. This would be an alternative route which would be more accessible to the hospital site than an extension of Southlawn. Furthermore, construction -of the slip ramp does not necessitate the construction of Southlawn. The residents of County Road D are waiting for the development to come to help pay for the assessments of the widening. This development will not come if there is no access to where the major development area would be, which is to the south. He thought there would be an extreme cost with the development of Southlawn to the Hajicek property and the County Road D property. Bob Johnson, center manager of Maplewood Mall, the owners are in favor of the Southlawn extension to County Road D with the slip entrance off 694. The commission questioned why St. Johns and the mall favor the Southlawn development and extension. Mr. Knutson indicated that when they considered dev elopment of their property and neighboring property, it was felt the extension .would be benef i ti a 1. After reviewing the traffic studies their major concern was traffic congestion. He cited Fairview /Southdal a situation which may be similar. They felt the extension of Southlawn would �eep the .traffic congestion away from Maplewood West Boulevard and Beam Avenue 4 4 -2 -84 4J Mr. Johnson said that coming in from the west side, it would eliminate some traffic from White Bear Avenue. This would also encourage peop to ark on the p e west side of the ma ll. Chairman Axdahl closed the public �heari ng portion of the meeting. The commission di scu�sed with Director Haider road alignments that could • be developed that may ease the traff situation on White Bear Avenue. The commission - suggested getting information as to traffic counts with the development of the northerly parcels. Commissioner Whitcomb moved the P1'anni ng Commission recommen to the city council that they take no action onthe plan amendment, but adopt p the following guidelines for the development of local streets in the area: A. The following streets should be cons in development plans for the area: 1. Maplewood West Boulevard from at least Beam Avenue to the north property line of Mr. Korstad's property. Continuation of this street to County Road D may be allowed by the city, provided that traffic from Mr. Ha j i cek' s property is reasonably di over Hazelwood Avenue, Maplewood West Boulevard and a future Southlawn Drive, 2. A Southl awn Drive from Beam Avenue to County Road D with a s l i p ramp from I -694. The alignment may have to be realigned to the west to front on properties that would benefit from the assessments. 3. An east -west street connecting Maplewood West Boulevard and Southl awn Drive. There should be access to this street from the Korstad and Ha j i cek properties. B. The city shall actively seek to preserve the right -of -way for a s l i p ramp from I -694 to a future Southl awn Drive, until a decision is made on the feasibility of construction Authorize staff to send a letter to the Minnesota Department of Transportation requesting a slip ramp from I -694 to proposed Southl awn Drive. Staff should also be authorized to study means of preserving the right -of -way. Commissioner Sl etten seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl , Barrett, E 1 l of son, Fischer, Pel l i sh, Robens. Si gmundi k, S1 etten, Whitcomb III. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Vi l e COMMUNICATIONS VIII. NEW BUSINESS _ A. PUD Time Extension - -Hazel Ridge Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting approval of the renewal of the conditional use permit for Hazel Ridge planned unit development. Staff is recommending approval of the request. 5 4 -2 -84 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Prel i mi nary Plat LOCATION: County Road D APP-LI CANT: C. H. Luther OWNER: Tousley Development Corp. PR6JECT: Tousl ey Addition DATE: May 24, 1984 SUMMARY Request Action by Cou.n�il: Endorsed ModifiedL.: Date Approval of a preliminary plat that would replat part of the Viking Development Addition into five lots. (See page 7 .) Proposed Development Lot l: car wash (approved by the community design review board) Lot 2: Kinder Care Day Care Center (tabled by the community design review board) Lot 3: Goodyear car service Lot 4: carpet store Lot 5: not planned yet Alternatives 1. Require dedication of permanent right —of —way within 100 feet of the center line of the proposed White Bear Avenue ramp and 70 feet of the center line of the proposed Southlawn ramp and temporary construction easements as shown on the Minnesota Department of Transportation's (MnDOT) plan. 2. Require dedication of right —of —way for the Southlawn ramp only. This would probably eliminate the option of a future ramp to White Bear Avenue. 3. Table action until the July 23 council meeting to get commitments from MnDOT and the major property owners in the area. 4. Approve the plat with no right —of —way dedication, thereby, eliminating a White Bear Avenue slip ramp. Comments Thi s plat forces the city to consider a major decision on a slip ramp from I -634 to County Road D. The pros and cons of a s l i p ramp have already been discussed as part of the Maplewood West Boulevard plan amendment. Council must now decide whether to require dedication of right —of way for the slip ramp and, if so, where the right —of —way should be acquired. If this plat is approved without dedication of right —of —way, the resulting development would make future acq uisit i on for a Why to Bear ._Avenue ramp financially i nfeas i bl a because of the cost of buying n out future Y g businesses. If no right —of —way is required, it may still be possible to build a Southl awn ramp. The existing White Bear Avenue ramp would have to be retained or County Road D used as access to White Bear Avenue. These alternatives r a e not favored by MnDOT and would make approval of a slip ramp more difficult if not out t of the geusti on. This . at should be tabled until MnDOT decides whether they will approve a sl ip' ! ramp and -participate in its costs. There is enoug evidence from h g t Northeast Area Transportation study and the Benshoof report to pursue this P P s project with MnDOT. The planning commission recommended that the ' — e fight of — way for a s l i p ramp be preserved until a decision is made on the feasibil sup from the m of construction. There is also su PP ma jor landowners �n the area. On the other hand, there is no point requiring right—of—way, if MnDOT w i l l not approve a ramp. The city has already received a letter from MnDOT a e r �p g l2 � expre ssing essing reservations about a slip ramp, but they will not take a firm position without doing a study. Recommendation Table action, no later than the Jul 23 council m e eting eting to get a commitment from MnDOT on whether a ramp would be approved, which alternatives would be approved and how much of the cost they would participate in. The major property J P P Y owners in the area should also be prepared on this date to commit to financial participation. 2 BACKGROUND Site Description Acreage: 9.6 Existing land use: undeveloped Surrounding Land Uses . Northerly: Highway 694 Easterly: Midas muffler Southerly: County Road D Westerly: single dwelling Past Actions 1974: The Northeast Maplewood Street Improvement Feasibility Study did not propose a Islip ramp (page $ ). 1975: The Northeast Area Transportation Study recommended a slip ramp and frontage road (page 9 ). This study was prepared for Ramsey County with the agreement of northeast area cities (including Maplewood), the Metropolitan Council and the :Minnesota Department of Transportation. The study,was approved by the Metro - politan Council in 1977 and Ramsey County. It was accepted, but not approved by Maplewood, 1979: The Maplewood Transportation Plan, done by Barton- Aschman, does not proposed a slip ramp (page 10 ). March, 1984: The Traffic Study for the Maplewood West Area, by Jim Benshoof for William Korstad, recommends a slip ramp (page 11 ). 3- 27 -84: The design review board approved a car wash for lot one, 4 -2 -84: The pl anni ng commission recommended that the city actively seek to preserve the right -of -way for a slip ramp from I -694 to a future Southl awn Drive, until a decision is made on the feasibility of construction. The commission also re- commended that staff be authorized to send a letter to the Minnesota Department of requesting a slip ramp from I -694 to proposed Southlawn Drive. Staff should also be authorized to study means of preservvi ng the right -of -way. . 2 3 5- 22 -84: The community design review board tabled action on the Kinder Care business Proposed for lot 2, until a decision is made on right -of —way acquisition. Planning Land use plan designation: SC, servi ce commercial Zoning: BC, business commercial Section 30 -6 (e) of city code states that "The city council may require that a reasonable portion of any proposed subdivison be dedicated to the public or preserved for public use as streets , and similar utilities and improvements." . Section 30 -5 (c) states that ". , , a subdivision application shall be pre — limnarily approved or disapproved within 120 days following delivery of an application completed in compliance with the city ordinance by the applicant to the city, unless an extension of the review period has been agreed to by the appl i cant. " This application was received on April 3. A dec i s i o must, therefore, be made by July 23, n - -- - - - J.. - -- is Planning commission recommendation _2,, City couni 1 holds a public hearing and makes the 'final decision. -n-L-L- _L -__-L_ In Location map 2. Property line /zoning map 3. Preliminary plat 4. N.E. Maplewood Feasibility Study 5, N.E. Area Transportation Study 6. Major street plan 7. Benshoof traffic study 81D MnDOT letter 9. Preliminary plat (revised 4 -5 -84 /separate attachment) 4 iE-lGHTs'-.C6 WE ROAD IAIS t G[ SME R D 0 Cn WHITE. BEAR LAKE C68 Fit 65 WOODLYNN AVE FURNESS --LY 2CT A q wl PLE LANE A - liMAP LEVIE-W AYL ... IF ( 2),Oz, PRIVATE STREET (MESSABI AVE) NORT qLMAN IAVE. 2640 N. D. 65 11 th AVE. j i�l AY 2400 No L EE jAS AS T LE E JXY �F LOCATION MAP' attachment one s 7 d0. �9 !,2s 99 T? 22. 1R /R_ -12 I $ Af 468* -- T T SGB. 45 INTERSTATE 694 ! l • - a 1 1 _ y _ ,, ;."..•" ;.i.....n,p/:.ar,7- s.- :..;,, •• : dr - j., ;. - •.• ...... y S $r `"" 6e :--= r..,;i-:•°'h11+- ....q,— "sue -r,.*. ,. �. -.. VIKING *t D i ` E 7 f 6 M I DA., s 3 DD I T MUFfLER I 0 S HO P COUNTY — t R OAD D � - - JC M r' .,rte. �+.. It ° % CHILDR NS o� h PALACE r�. �j to s ► - - _ fig. , { ,, j a . - ° c v i PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 6 attachment two 332• G ? � 1 � 33G 67 ` 4'2S "4 • 4 N t • BI DATA LEGAL PRELIMINARY PLAT soft aft—ft-ft TOUSLEY ADDITION ..•�..�.../� TOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORP. ...� ...r. 1 599 WAM[TOV I8UAO / WMI / /AR LAKI. •M U PON PRELIMINARY PLAT — — — Proposed right —of --way 7 attachment three 4 N I go* w.w• BRA' r< w. �•�� �.ew MM ra 9 1111 HFA =w. 1� w�.1 w.r ". .ww •.t+ r M r !� 11 �, LEGEND ; , t o r �ws u� -- •wwr ---�- -� LOCATION! MAP 6w rwr. SOME wwmmewu • ..rte 1..�rw an"" NOW rwa r «- .r 1♦ ____mma Y / PON PRELIMINARY PLAT — — — Proposed right —of --way 7 attachment three 4 N s i • t LEGEND+ STAGING NORTHEAST MAPLEWOOD FEASIBILITY STUDY 2 3 fa i. i ii i � i 8 Attachment four 1� rt rt 0 rt -h J. C rD Not . � 1 1 • , 1 I•I•. � �'r � r •� • .. � • • t r A w � : I%f ei Y�i t • ry . �. ,�1 f !. ,�,w/. ••�`�,,� '�.�.• ,� �`�'' ' 1' �Ti.. • ; ,r. w + r� yy l w► . •• ' tia 'Il r�• •w. �� M. w. ' '1 /f� l Vft t ED f 01AV •�i' of t • 1 ,'�, tt(�-(, / �� • t ALL • ' R ',T. , a, • .�. 1 •' •�. ,j� •' .•.4A�. • • •. 1 w f14��r�L \� ,' �r•11. �V�.� t1' � ,•� y7 y. � j • 4 r � • VIP. f a ll . V• 1 ( 7 rte ,.•.►• ■ ♦ f M� lot �, 1 t• , ' lilt. • J • , , ,..•, ,� p •�' , ►•.l ' . . ' ' AM 0 00 Lev - y+� , RA' jam' DL "it � r ter 4 do • 1 , lit ;: ► :1► t.. • � r'1 � �q' I i' • 1 �• ( � , , ' ) :• �• � j � �►w / S � • 1 - 1 • r � • � • � 1 - �� �v ., .�• ' b 1 1 I � •, , '�t. r 1 ♦• ' tY 1 j. �t o% .• 't 1 lot WW tj Il 11 AL .4 !• • . ` l f ' • �tl� . , }` ' r.A , , ) ' �• � f• r � ���! � � ,r .....•� w. 4 9 � A Ill 1 ., /`y� Jr r 1 . 'M ►, 1 1 . * *,� ,�; �• r �► - ter+ • j tt .. ► t f(. . '1 i Cq I . 4 a ! :�: k, Source : F gure 18 "Northeast Area Transportation Study Barton Aschman Associates Inc. June 1975 WILLIAM B. KORSTADr 1 TRAFFIC STUDY FOR ULTIMATE ROADWAY SYSTEMS FROM MAPLEWOOD WEST AREA NORTHEAST AREA TRANSPORTATION BENSHOOF AND ASSOCIATES STUDY TRA"FMTA10N PtIM04 Pn E► 0#*E CONSU•TANT ' r s Met • •.r •: • ►. t 1 0 0 17 nflo I p VApNAt: WOOS w - 1 4. " .. 00 .:.... . ■ I� t.,t�s J 04 All an ver me low `4 00, #@pow s' t't:Sy _.��/ I . Z ~i.: !t, PAUL t... .... C. : I z :r � • • . a Ilr lit+► _t_ •" . .. 1,•• M 1 • s at rt� >, • t R rte y •.�- �'~'' ► little, �. 1, � � � ' .� • :ri ! �� w ���� t; •• i fN�l *Ai *OWN 4111 5 w ♦ >M � • �!r t 1 A'�� ' , �' • .��„�,1. ��1�. Qtr � 4This kMa �,;, �c 1k ;� t•n�c• , . J)U1 , �t,•S Onh► and not be used where Pry - ;,: :,; • / i ,�, '� = A: '71K�Mj� . , ��'�,� rneaSu�emertl K tequ - . ,.. {v - lG, ,� M rt N w �• �A t R I ~ :: - �" ' `.,►�.. r- --- I ql I, or �t tilt �tt� t t t t t • • J„1(�t" , 1 1 . • #live V off cow ` � a ' Ya �..� � } � , � � � - r" 1 r• • � Mf I , ,' i r • •'! �/ 4 �.. - , 1 / � • I a ,rl��L FPM I "AT" It ►Atli. � -1 • L MW owl tot 100, ' O 7 it t • I i 71 f _ •%rte 1 �, { � g u1_L�{�tM�'•. ' •�... � .►. 7 , ] J 1 U ( It 11 Ja ' I �� t i •1 ST. PAUL w =to 0 "we Ow h rsr an ma o ee tie vneh 9.s.t *"4Y NOW INS Princi Intermediate Arterials a .�..... Major Arterial ,�►t �;w M � . �'' 'ltli.• ' X11) �. •w s � �b '�� � -'� p . 'r 4/ ' ........ Minor Arterial C•t• i� rr �•,1 tt•• �, l••+ �: N X ' Major Collector 7• Minor Collector O P T pmmred b NORTHWEST Interchange = r ASSOCIATED •• CONSULTANTS INC. fops n v �' �►��tl� Source: Moplewood Transportation Plan, Barton•teAschman, 1979 , ` e •;- kc�~ rant» �nit _ A[•„p�t Rev 1' sect: 10• "6 - u1 r In LJ Low •1• Reconstruct As Fu 1 1 Diamond Interchan a Per Mn /D0T s Plans 1,494 , ..... .. Construct New" 0xit Ramp To Co COUNTY Roao a »Rd D And S outilawn Dr. f Construct South 1 awn Dr. Between n 1 a r a Rad i u s Co . Rd . D And Beam Ave. ( E Collector NNS LW y oody nn, ' Ft POP- • a o° v L b N SIC 4 AV A VIE J I EA k4 Connect Co. Rd. D And Beam Ave. —» Plan Local Streets And Develop- Per County's p Plan ment Access Points To Provide • Effective Access , To Balance • V , Traffic Usage Among Available e Intersections And To Mai ntai n -- o Level of Service C At All N Z ° I ntersecti ons 4- ' 1000 4 J xoMtw AVE. x �, K�t.��►H �► APProx. Scale a 49 line C- WILLIAM B. KORSTAD TRAFFIC STUDY . FIGURE 3 FOR MAPLEW00D WEST AREA RECOMMENDED ROADWAY SYSTEM PLAN BENSHOQF AND ASSOCIATES ' TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND ENGINEERINO CONSULTANT: • t ;. .� a OF Tv P hlinncuS()ta Dckparin - ) . nt OA Transport District 9 348� Hadley$ :- vc North. BOx 20Z Droll St. Paul, Minnesota 53109 May 9, 1984 Mr. Geoff Olson Planning Director City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Geoff: Telephone 77 9 -1210 As you requested at our April 18 meeting, .I am writing to outline the District's reaction to your I -694 /White Bear Avenue eastbound offramp modification proposal. These comments are based on the concept, drawn by us, of which,.you have a copy, that shows bringing the ramp off of eastbound I- 694 just east of the Burlington Northern bridge, allowing a slip ramp off to County "D" at proposed Southlawn Drive, and having the ramp exit onto White Bear Avenue as it does presently. We do have reservations regarding this proposal. From a design perspective the ramp is too long (3500 feet), slip ramps are not common to the Interstate system, "signing" the various movements would be a problem, and slip ramp maintenance would be inefficient (costly). This unusual design may prove to be unsafe, and is not consistent with Mn /DOT and Federal Highway Administration policy to pro - vidt uniform interchange configurations. From a capacity perspective the proposed ramp modification may not be needed. If the ramp termini intersections of I -694 and White Bear Avenue reach unaccept- able levels of service, there remain other, more standard and less costly, congestion remedies. From a planning perspective the proposed modification is not needed if its purpose is to correct local access and /or capacity deficiencies created by a lack of a suitable local street support system or by excessive access to adjacent land par- cels. Ameliorating local transportation problems via Interstate modifications is not thought to be appropriate. Finally, from a costs and priorities perspective, if the ramp modification was to be constructed, it is likely that the City would need to provide the necessary rights of way needed as well as the approximately three quarters of a million collar construction costs (a very rough estimate). If the City wishes to further pursue this proposal I suggest that you formally ask Mn /DOT (request of our District Engineer, Kermit McRae) to _ - participate in a joint study. Such a study would likely entail design and otFaer activities aimed at getting approvals from Mn /DOT and the Federal Highway Administration, and, possibly, from the Metropolitan Council. An Equal Opportunit Y f mplo rer attachment eieht r Mr. Geoff Olson May 9, 1984 Page two t I -would be happy to go over these reservations a • and procedures with you in rfbre detail if you like. Please keep me informed of the status of y o ur proposal. Sincerely, Jerry Skelton District Planning Coordinator 13 1 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LO APOL I CANT/ OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: City Manager Associate Planner -- Johnson PUD Revision and Preliminary Plat Dennis.Street, south of Ivy Avenue Ed.Cave and Sons Cave's Century 4th Addition May 16, 1984 SUMMARY i MEMORANDUM `ration by C ourlo i l 2ndorsd Red ecte. -.� gate Reque Amend the Cave's Century Addition planned unit development (PUD) and to replat a - portion of Cave's Century 3rd Addition to substitute 14 single - dwelling lots for .22 double-dwelling lots, _ rnmmn" + c The substitution of 14 single dwellings for 22 double dwellings would be consistent with the land use plan, zoning and subdivision codes. The applicant feels he can market single dwellings easier than double dwellings. Eleven of the proposed 14 single - dwelling lots would have areas of between 9,400 and 10 ,000 square feet. This is permitted in areas planned for Rm, resi- dential medium density use when zoned for R2, double dwelling or by PUD. Recommendation I. Approve the enclosed resolution (page 8) revising the Century Addition planned unit development to permit a change from double to single dwellings for the area proposed as the Cave's Century Fourth Addition, subject to (previous conditions to be deleted are crossed out): 17-- Start4Hg- eenstruet4eH- w4th4H- eHe - year7 27 -The- PUB - fay -be- renewed - after - year- by- eeuReil- appreva4- 4f- eeHstruet4eH- has -Het- started. 1. 2: Community Design Review .Board approval of site, building and landscape plans. Quad structures with similar exteriors must be located at least 500 feet apart. ,7_ 20 "No Parking" signs are to be placed on the private drives to m a i n t a i n . - emergency vehicle access (multiple dwellings proposed for this northeast portion of the -si . II. Approval of Cave's Century Fourth Addition preliminary plat for one .year. ! � BACKGROUND Site Description Gross area: 4.1 acres Net area: 3.2 acres .Existing Land Use: undeveloped =- Sufrounding Land Uses -` North: two double - dwelling lots. One structure is under construction. East: single-dwelling lots. Some of the dwellings are under construction South: Hawthorne Avenue and a single - dwelling lot. Across the street are single- dwelling lots. West: Quad structures Pa Actions 2- -7 -80: A. Cave' s Century Addition planned unit development (PUD) was approved, subject to: 1. Starting construction within one year. :2. The PUD may be renewed after one year by council approval if construction has not started. 3. Community Design Review Board approving the site, building and landscape plans. Council also required that quad units with similar exteriors must be located at least 500 feet apart. B. Cave's Century Addition preliminary plat was approved, subject to ten conditions. Three of these conditions are still in effect. See conditions one- and two of the 6 -14 -82 approval. 5- 1.5 -80 and 9 -4 -80: Time extensions for the PUD and preliminary plat were approved. 1- 22-81: A. Council approved the Cave's Century (1st) Addition final plat for the quad units along the west boundary of the site (page 7), subject to the submission of a signed developer's agreement and trai easements before city signing of the plat. B. Condition three of the 2 -7 -80 preliminary plat approval was replaced with "all building construction shall comply with the .approved PUD." 6-14-82: Council approved a revision to the PUD and preliminary plat, changing the north- east portion of the site from quads to townhouses. A. The PUD, as revised on 1- 22 -81, was amended to include a requirement for "no parking" signs are to be placed on the private drives to maintain emergency _ 2 _ vehicle access. a B. The preliminary plat conditions were revised to the following: .1. Footing for double, townhouse or quad units shall be pinned b a y. registered surveyor before the foundation is laid to assure _that party t walls will be constructed exactly on common lot lines, -- 2.. All building construction shall comply with the approved =PUD. - 3. Submission of proposed bike trail easements. 4. Submission of a signed developer's agreement to be approved by the director of public works. 6. The developer's agreement shall include the construction of a 10 -foot trail and fencing on the proposed bike trail easements, to be approved by the director of community services. 6. The developer's agreement shall include construction of a minimum five- foot chain link fence on the Century East Townhouse property line, from the west boundary of the Century East Apartments, to the northwest corner of the townhouse property, and from the same corner of the southwest corner of Lot. 8, Block 1. Myhra Addition. The Century . East remainder of the recre- ation area, including a lockable gate. The Association's shall file an irrevocable letter of credit or cash deposit with the city within one week of the signing of the developer's agreement, for the Association's share of the fence cost. If the fence is not constructed by the Association within 60 days after the developer has completed his part of the fence, the Associ- ation's security deposit shall' be forfei to the developer as reimburse- ment for his costs. Failure of the Townhouse Association to agree to this condition shall end the developer's responsibility for fencing. (The A s s o ci - at w contacted o n May__ 15, 1 984. They no l onger �wi sh _to � _regu i re : thi s fence. �. 7. Approval of final utility and drainage plans by the director of public works. 8. Implementation of the recommendations of the soil conservation service. 9. Enlarge the utility easement (townhouse plat) for sanitary sewer and water main to thirty feet in width. 10. An easement from the adjacent property owner must be submitted for off -site grading. = 11. Revise the plat (townhouse) to provide twenty feet between blocks three and four. 12, - Revise the plat (townhouse) to provide fifty feet _ between blocks two and three. _ 13. Homeowner's agreement shall restrict tenure to owner - occupied. - 3 - 2- 1.4 -83: Cave's Century 2nd Add i ton (page 7) final plat was approved. 25 -83: A two -year time extension was approved for the PUD and those port -ions of the preliminary plat that had not been final platted. _ 7- _L-3-84: Cave's Century 3rd Addition final plat (page 7) was approved. P1 an i ng 1. Land use plan description: Rm, residential medium density.' 20 Zoning: planned unit development. This portion of the site was originally approved for 22 double dwellings. 3. Compliance with land use laws: a. The proposal meets or' exceeds all zoning and subdivision requirements. b. Section 30- 8(f)(1 )(d) permits single- dwelling lots with no less than 7,500 square feet of area where designated for Rm use. Eleven of the proposed lots would have between 9,400 and 10,000 square feet. The other' three lots would have more than 10,000 square feet of area. c. Section 36 -442 requires ten findings for approval of a conditional use permit (required for the planned unit development). Refer to the attached. resolution for these findings. n - A..._- 1. Planning commission recommendation 2. Council decision, following a public hearing mb Attachments: - 1. :-Location map 20 !Proposed Cave's Century 4th Addition 3. -Cave's Century Addi ton PUD and Preliminary Plat _ 440 =Resolution - 4 - F 30 -- LARPENTEVR AVE 0 IDAHO AVE. W z • K il M A RYLA KE RD. W • �. ' I z -LAJ IVY AVE Trailer Court X .*. . 68 (Private) . 212 E. MARYLAN ...... I .:*.*- s S ST T T Z 75 Cr. I 1010� Cw, 6 W U) -W.Wo ay M ver MA K 41.1A AVL. 0 La k e 0 ��10 e VL Ohl z Ic L - - *' - - - ' -, C A S E G A V E. C % 32 (3 = O 69 1.- x 0 I-- z HARVES AVE 212 LA. BRAND AV w E 0-- D sc 3 T. J. TTHI[kA'vE E. 7 TH AVE. 4. T29N U g H r 5 2530 R22W R21W '**I- �,-- - AVE. Cr 36131 x E H A M A AVE 10 LOCATION MA CAVE's CENTURY ADDITION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Attachment I f i A�. I m - z C T w N Q H F--i z 1 /\ 1 1 � A TI; n v Proposed Cave's Century 4th Addition (Repl of a portion of the 3rd Addition) - 6 - Attachment Two ' 11 t 1 R 1 r• � i 1 I t 1 t t 4 N . 1 1 1 iMOS -• 1s 1 � � t 1 r 1 • 1 1 L 1 t r ' 1 _ � I r 1 -• � N v 1 1 1 N 1.!►� r J V 1 Je tr t � •1 1 1 . 1 :._/ 1 � 1 1 v - 1 . 1 1 � CD 1 1 i 1 w r + � w � n v Proposed Cave's Century 4th Addition (Repl of a portion of the 3rd Addition) - 6 - Attachment Two ' 11 t 1 R 1 r• � i 1 I t 1 t t 4 N 3 t CAVE'S CENTURY ADDITION PVT T - -• ... :AK ED Ad _ _ J 1. 0-0** rr yL w w/p CAVE'S CENTURY 2ND ADDITION - f t dft r . j t ` ..... .. .:: = :;.. A j C40 0AA+ ' 3 1 Wit ' ......... pw Cave's Century 3rd Addition sww CAVES CENTURY ADDITION PUD AND PRELIMINARY PLAT Cave's Century 4th Addition ' (Partial r•epl at of the 3rd Addition) Attachment 3 7 w 4 N Pursuant to due c a l l and not-ice thereof a regular meetin o y f the city. council of the City of Maplewood, Mi nnesota was du l y * alled. and s Y helm in the • council chambers in said city on the day f Y 1.984 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: w WHEIEAS, Ed Cave and Sons, Inc. initiated a conditional use erm' p It for Cave' Century Addition planned unit development at the following- described property: The south three feet of lot six and lots seven through twenty, block o ne g and lots- eleven through eighteen, block two Cave's Secti 24 p 29, Range Range 22 Township Century 3rd Addition, . WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use P ermit is as follows: 10 This conditional use permit revision was initiated b Ed Cave e and Sons, Inc, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances to substitute fourteen single dwellings for 22 double dwellings, eleven of which would be between 9,400 and 10,000 square feet in area , 2.. This conditional use permit was reviewed by c� the T•1aplewoo Planning Commission on May 21, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be 310 The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 98 . Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and reco.zru of the city staff and planning commission. NOW., THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described conditional use permit revision be approved subject to the _following conditions: A � 1. Community Design Review Board approval of site, building and 1 andscape plans. Quad structures with similar exteriors must be located at least 500 feet apart. 20 -'No Parking" signs are to placed on the rivate drives es to maintain emergency vehicles access (multiple dwellings P g proposed for t h i s nor theast ' por t i on of the site), 3. This approval supercedes all previous approvals. Approval of this conditional use permit is on the basis of the following findings of fact: g - g - Attachment Four �# 10 The use is in conformity with the city's- comprehensive P 1 an and with the purpose and standards of the zoning code. 2 The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3.. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be c.ompatibIe with the character of the surrounding planning u -nit 9 P g development uses. — _. 40 The use would not depreciate property values-, 50 The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to 'the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor,, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. E. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or ark in P 5 needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would . be serviced by essential public services such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city.. 91 The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects, Adopted this day of , 1984. Seconded by Ayes - -. STATE OF MINNESOTA } COUNTY OF RAMSEY } SS. } CITY OF MAPLEWOOD } 1, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1984, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full true and complete transcriRt therefrom insofar as the same re lates to this planned unit development revision Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of-: city t h i s day of , 19840 r City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota �1 E. PUD Revision and Preliminary Plat--Cave's Secretary Olson said the proposal is to amend Addition planned unit development to eeplat a Century 3rd Addition to substitute 14 single- .22 double - dwelling lots. Century 4th Addition the Cave's Century portion of Cave's dwelling lots for The commission reviewed the size of the lots proposed. .-Commissioner Fischer moved the planning commission forward the-following : resolution to the city council: WHEREAS, Ed Cave and Sons, Inc. initiated a conditional use permit for Cave's Century Addition planned unit development at the following- described property: The south three feet of lot six and lots seven through twenty, block one and lots eleven through eighteen, block two. Cave's Century 3rd Addition,. Section 24, Township 29, Range 22, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the above - described conditional use permit revision be approved subject to the following conditions: 1 . Community Design Review Board approval of site, b u i l d i n g and landscape plans. Quad structures with similar exteriors must be located at least 500 feet apart. 2. "No Parking" signs are to be placed on the private drives to maintain emergency vehicles access (multiple dwellings proposed for this northeast portion of the site), 3. This approval supercedes all previous approvals. Approval of this conditional use permit is on the basis of the following findings-of-fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of the zoning code. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, and maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of the surrounding planned unit development uses. 7 5 -21 -84 ' r �s 4. The use would not depreciat P e property values. 5. The use woud not be hazardo ' us, detrimental or di sturbri ng to present and potential surrounding Land .uses, due to the not sus, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run—off, ' - t o f, vi b_-ration general unsi htl iness, electrical cal interference or other ' _i l nuisa -aces. 69 The use would generate only ini ft y mal vehicular traffic on local - streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe g a ccess or parking needs that wi cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The Qse would be serviced by essential ubl services, ro p such as streets, police, fire protection, on, utilities, schools. and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; an would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. y 9. The use would preserve and incgr. orate the site's p natural and sce features in to the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse en ronmental effects. The commission al so ap pp oval of the Caves Century Fourth Addition preliminary plat for one year. Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes-- Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Fischer, He jny, Larson, Robens, Si mundi k 1 g , S etten, Whitcomb. MEMORANDUM .TO: City Manager FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson SUBJECT: Building Relocation LOCATION: North of 1525 South Sterling Street APPLICANT/OWNER: Dennis Schl omka _DATE: May #24, 1984 SUMMARY Re uest ri I� Action by Ends e d_...__._-. Modified...._.._.. -, .. Re j ectQ Dat p Approval to relocate a single dwel to the north of 1525 South Sterling Street. Description of Dwelling I. Refer to the photos submitted by the applicant. 2. The dwelling is presently located in Woodbury, near Carver Lake. 3. It is a one - story, walk -out dwelling, containing about 1200 square feet of foundation area. It was built in 1969. 4. It is being moved to make way for a multiple-dwelling development. rnmmantc This dwelling would be compatible with the existing dwellings in the area. The surrounding property owners approve of the dwelling to be relocated to this site (page 8). Code authorizes council to require cash escrows of: 1) up to $100O.to guarantee that any damage to city streets will be repaired and 2) 11 times the construction cost to assume completion within ninety days. These escrows are not necessary in this case. Only a quarter m i l e of Sterling Street would be crossed. The remainder of the streets (Century and Carver Avenues) are the county's responsibility. Curb and gutter, usually the most likely items to be damaged, do not exist. The second escrow, to guarantee timely completion, is not necessary. Staff has worked with Mr. Schlomka in the past and has confidence in his ability to complete the work. Recommendation Authorize the proposed dwelling to be relocated to the north of 1525 South - Sterling Street, subject to: 1. Proof that a deed has been recorded to create the site. (An administrative - lot division was approved on May 22, 1984.) r 2. The north l i n e of the l shall be located by land survey =and shall be readily identifiable from the proposed building site. 3. Identification by land survey or city receipt of written notification from Williams Pipeline Company as to the westerly boundary of their pipeline easement. The boundary shall be readily identifiable from the building site. Approval is on the basis that: 1. The structure's exterior siding, height, mass, age and style of construc- tion are compatible with that of the average home in the neighborhood. 20 That all city coda requirements can met.. 3. That water runoff from the site will not cause an adverse- on surrounding properties. 4. Public streets can be protected from damage. 5. The proposed move would not degrade the public health, safety or welfare. -2- BACKGROUND Site Description Area: 1.7 acres Existing land use: Two small sheds that are to be removed. Easements Williams Brothers Pipeline along the Sterling Street frontage Surrounding Land Uses - North: Ramsey Open Space is in the process of acquiring much of the property to the north. It is presently undeveloped and zoned for F, farm residence use East: single dwellings South: the applicant's single dwelling home West: I -494 Planning 1. Land Use planning designation: RL, residential lower density 2: Zoning: F, farm residence 3. Section 9 -64(a) requires five findings for approval of a building relocation request. (See the recommendation on page 1). 4. Section 9 -64(b) authorizes council to require compliance with any or all of the following conditions, or any additional conditions that are deemed necessary: a. Cash escrow, an irrevocable letter of credit of up to $1,000.00, or an equivalent quality of security as approved by the city council to guarantee any street repair that may be required resulting from damages caused by moving the building. b. Lot lines shall be verified by the applicant by survey pins. c. The petitioner shall furnish an irrevocable letter of credit or cash escrow 12 times the .estimated cost of remodeling, refinishing or other- wise constructing or reconstructing such b u i l d i n g in accordance with the plans and specifications. With this surety, it shall be further conditioned that the work will be completed within ninety days of the issuance of the permit. d. This building site is located within the shoreland of Fish Creek (see _ page 6). The dimensions shown on the site plan (page 7) are consistent _ with the shoreland ordinance requirements. Ramsey County Public Works A house - moving permit is required to travel on Century and Carer Avenues. -3- Environmental Health a Percolation test results of nd i cate that the soil is satisfactory for on -site sewage disposal. Citizen Comments :- The applicant circulated a petition among their surrounding property owners (page 8). No one objected to this request. City council decision, following a public hearing JW Attachments 1. Location map 2. Property line /zoning map 3. Proposed site plan 4. Petition 5. Photographs (to be handed out at the council meeting) -4- f - -- s 25 ) 2 23 LINW000 AVE. , AHL AV 12 z H� >-- O CT T2•N w - 11 T R2tw I R21W _... _ �. a _ - � cn PMYLI Q 3 72 . 74 494 HIG A 74 25 VIE AVE. h E WTZ LAVE _ LA 25 ) SOUTHC S 72 i Corver IL z Loke ,,OX W0oo AVE_ C ove z 0 72 I V CARVEk AV 43 4 �. 6Q :.. Q � r: Qr •. T28N A 24f 19 _ 22 W R21W �. 25130 . -� 4 6o 494 WASHINOTON CO. NEWPORT Im LOCATION MAP -5- Attachment 1 Q N 1 a c. T � � i •► � 1 ut IV � r— to I o � � •nom � 0 i J ! F .1 T t r 4W _ 1 1 o i i • QC + 1 RAMSEY COUNTY LJ t•i r T 1 .n I ti sh0relend baundac�. = -- � 21 Proposed location of dwe lling - -- -- - - .. Proposed l ' division line ` � 4 ..„ i 0. PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP -6- Attachment 2 4 N � � I T. ~ l� J v �X� or t. V I N r 1� i� o .+►�iwo��r Li A ,J �M �M_.w , .w......w -_•._. .wry ..•_�. -. ��� ' X ... "mum 6? O 6r�u'l cu /� ...y • Zw. wVn�• r +vw rrn..-..e. �. . -r�A�► i�..wr+�+`.eA#�Mr�aw.I +�Aaawr�..w- s► *•�► ^'.�r�v►w . w.►. � f w w�f s wwr�w . - Mwr �svwl �rll+ �rOM��!.. �. w�s�w� .�rwwo�•wr�•+w..�ww +•- �.. -.M.. .. ..•w ..rw. •v w.n.. ..•.. ,.......... .r... .• .+ rwo.. :. w. rw« w�.. �- w•. �. �n....«.........+...... .r...•...�.w........�.......... ,.r ..y...�...•....•..•... 1V C R/ May 1984 Dennis and Carol Schlomka at 1525 So. Sterling St* have t the intentions to move a house in on the North part of our p _ This is s a list of our surrounding neighbors, who have No Objection to our moving said house in. S v i Z c,..- -8- Attachment 4 r fi i -- 4 MEMORANDUM Act-- on by �__c' EndorsQP ri TO : ,City Manager Mod if i � _ `�----� ---� ---� FROM: Public Works Director Re j a ct e d- �- ---- -- . SUBJECT: Water Supply West of T.H. 61 and North of Beam Avenue Date DATE: June 4, 1984 There are two reasonable alternatives to consider for water service in t h i s area.. Atlernative 1- -Local System A local system to serve only that area adjacent to and north of Beam Avenue west of T. H. 61 is considered. Approximately 160 acres of land is involved, Rough calculations indicate a 1200 GPM well 'and a 60,000 gallon elevated tank are required for an adequate water supply This does not address any of the distribution system of pipes in the street. Alternative one has an estimated cost as follows: Wel and pumphouse Elevated tank $250,000 75, $325,000 The water provided by this system would be untreated well water. Individual water softeners may be required. The City of Maplewood would become responsible for a small inefficient water company. The c i t y would read meters, provide billings, and collections, maintain the distribution system, take responsibility for water quality monitoring along with other miscellaneous responsibilities. The equivalent to two or three full -time positions would =be created for this work. Alternative 2-- Maplewood System The Maplewood water plan was developed to serve this area. The elevated tank on Highway 36 was sized to serve the area as well as substantial investments made in oversizing the distribution system to provide adequate supply. The estimated cost to provide two 12 -inch connections to the west side of T.H. 61 is aprpox i mate l y $340,000. The supply would be treated St. Paul water. The system would also be maintained by St. Paul as is most of Maplewood's water system. TT TO M FROM: DATE SUBJECT MEMORANDUM Director of Community Development Director of Public Works- - December 3, 1981 A number of questions. misconceptions, and misunderstandings are apparent when discussing alternative methods of public water supply in this area. The intention here is to identify from a qualitative standpoint the advantages and disadvantages of the alternatives brought up in past di s cuss i o.ns on the subject. PROJECT NO. tiiNP FOLDER NO. INMALS G Public Water Supply for area west of Highway . 61 and North of Beam Avenue. ALTERNATIVE I - Extension of Maplewood System _ v The present Maplewood Comprehensive Water Plan represents several years of study. A number of alternatives were considered during the process, The most cost-effective system was determined to be the system identified in the current plan. Maplewood has invested a considerable amount of money in the existing water system with the intention of serving the subject area. The trunk distribution system and elevated storage tank on Highway 36 have been sized to provide service. ce . The subject area has been assessed for the elevated tank* ALTERNATIVE II - Extension of Vadnais Heights System The City Engineer from Vadnais Heights has indicated that under current P lanning their water system could not provide adequate service to the subject area. Unplanned improvements to the Vadnais Heights Distribution network may upgrade their system sufficiently to provide limited service to Maplewood. An initial investigation indicates rather expensive improve- ments are needed in Vadnais Hei ghts,such as premature extension and oversi zi ng of the distribution system and major freeway crossings. It is-assumed that Maplewood would be expected to extensive) in the cost of these improvements. This participate y is a duplication of cost since Mapl ewood has already oversized its own system to provide service to the subject areas If money is to be invested it should be in Maplewood, not Vadnais Heights 's ALTERNATIVE III - Permanent Localized System Alternative III considers ders a well and distribution system to serve the subject area on a permanent basis. This type of system requires a high initial capital investment for an inferior system when compared to that identified in the Comprehensive Water Plan. Operation and maintenance costs for a small system are much 9 reaher than a large system on a per unit basis ow Director of Community Development - 2 - December 3, 1981 The system would be less reliable and the water of lower qual i ty. Individual water softeners may very well be needed. In addition, the City of Maplewood would become responsible for reading meters, billing, maintenance and operation of a _ small , inefficient water system. A .water department with corresponding -additional personnel would be required. ALTERNATIVE IV = Interim Localized System A system similar to Alternative III is considered here with the intention of future supply from the Central Maplewood System. At that time, the local well and appurtenant pumping equi pemnt would be abandoned. The disadvantages for Alternative III also apply here. An additional drawback is the wasted investment in the well and pumping equipment. rrwri IIC Tnlkl Alternative I - Extension of the Maplewood System is the preferred method for serving the subject area in view of the disadvantages associated with the other alternatives. Extension of the Maplewood system is still, however, considered premature. It is doubtful that the assessments associated with extension of the system past undeveloped property can be sustained at this time. An orderly extension of water service is planned to serve an orderly progression of development in the area east of Highway 61. Until this area is ready to develop, extension of water facilities west of Highway 61 is not recommended. �y TO: FROM SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: DATE: MEMORANDUM City Manager Director of Community Development Rezoning -- Initiation McKnight Road Richard 5chrei er May 25, 1984 Action by G Endorsed- .,.._- . Red ecte Date Re quest Cou ncil initiation of a rezoning from R -1 • single dwelling � ng res � dents al to R -2, double dwelling residential. Reason for the Request The applicant would like to build a double dwelling, but does not want to get a petition. (See enclosed letter on page 4.) Comments council should be concerned with recedent -- p • what is done for one, should be done for all. While this rezoning may eventual y y b e approved, there are no reasons for exempting Mr. Schre from the normal application process. Recommendation :Denial of the request on the basis that there is no son to exempt Mr. Schrei from the n ormal application process. jw 1. Lvcatilon map 2. Property line/zoning map 3. Letter f+ + W 60 N •� j 25 > 2160 N. �aPYWaOD (1) STANICH CT. PUBLIC ACS 11,100, _ t BLDG • NORTH ST. PAUL 29 4a '1 1 IZO H LO AY AVE. IL [2]12 0 21 � Ci Y AVE. 7 R I E Y AV ..i: I KINGSTON AVE J a V V Z J PRICE z AVE Q t N ; LARPENTE R AVE, Z IDAHO AVE. Lit Z T29N R22W to = 1 113 r dl Cn o >,. Q Q 23!24 i 01 cc G N�T N AVE. LLJ cn� 1440 No � R M A RYLAKE i J IVY Q �E D Trailer Court 68 (Private) -290NO 2.12 E MARYLA A 120 a- LOCATION MAP 2 Attachmen 1 Q N 0 ti 1865 1847 rz- J- Psi n C.; z 14 sk E r J Or 4 W- a - --.- JL 1 081. 101- `� `:: -Lie- -77 -7- 1898 11189 - - a - - _ � I I � I 4f .r 1881 I . 1886 I l I 17" ,t ,� 187 kv E Ey C I H 1869 185 .: 184� ** OIS xt EF I El - I PROPERTY LINE ZONING MAP 3 Attachment 2 2 1 -; f N h �4 Dc.Lr' fi c,r ,..�_ f - -fLf -_ aC '�- �...w_n�':..JR.+M�ir�•OL'� �rrc .. .1srU.�['. - -> -fir- -. :T -•.._- sa C �T.iec: -..i: .r..rc = et.t.�.+t� + -�^' -- �`._ '_.�r�_z�. �lv cr�arri_.+cwa'�'.rs_a1•.' Vr. w+ tw► -aL.�- .�r s - �r� �- a1C = � -,� " :11.i- /�srrars:-�^ aa.�. r• w- 1/�+.o+•.+w�:.: _ ..1�'anrr'�.arr��raa.� ..a ...'i.�r , sti 4 Attachment 3 ..1. RECIPIENT -- RETAIN V� HITE COPY, RETURN PINK COPY i_ .c. it • fi "r. ;. i ��� ;!: �.` iz. . eed Letter r , Tc From II '; �.+.�.o.,�ow._ s�soa. a�.�a�' sv:.: aes - --- -- wig �..r. -.- :..an..,.. -.o,.. < - ...._....c,..,_...� r _.:.e�> -+c -. ar:c..._. .- •.... -T.sa - ..._._ ...�o....:'- _- _ sr�y+.a .... - a.. r•..:•r.. •+rte: -� . _.� _- +aQ..r r�.r.. +�: .�..rr..a -.�/ MESSAGE d C ice L: C/ Ci I 0 L- C7 /P� 1 ��`- � � `�`'- -f4 r� -�-L. ��• ? �,� � �` _r Date r , 7 r:.� = vrrl!^• � '3 T- re ;�C'.a• - �r�'... a +fr. ._/!.' +• ...A� . Y.ris •�..L.a:.�.: 5. - � ��_'�.�.iti: -�Y'. _ti�4wG�.a :'aa•w'Y�1� REPLY <. r1r. y[ •ifrr .li]OC. - '.:_IG:_ J. '.-+.. �- .!"'' +Ia f -. .- r A�1 'fir- 1 - " -. Jrl!!'aA_+Y�r:' +'�` �!Y`�ace - . - Sir• - - - :�` .`.Yr'9f.'1A +fssa'J .. �..��.i -. - J '. .�,.5� ��hr .. 1k _.x.11+_• 'f�'�P vlwa�sr l � -c. - -. ....^ � -• - .. ^�.� - �.. r.♦ .+.ce >Kr.i�ll..+ci ylGf.a�Ri4t�:��?ti 1-..-iiVii�. .`11s'".�. '.�.11.1'•i0•. �_. �.R..1./C�'. -�r+s'_ +��rti .. �:ICL.:i�Y.R'�� lam_♦ .. . -i'. n.... ..Y•r_ - ._..�...�.�- aal!_� r i f >__� .�. "+rC. - Y�. - Dc.Lr' fi c,r ,..�_ f - -fLf -_ aC '�- �...w_n�':..JR.+M�ir�•OL'� �rrc .. .1srU.�['. - -> -fir- -. :T -•.._- sa C �T.iec: -..i: .r..rc = et.t.�.+t� + -�^' -- �`._ '_.�r�_z�. �lv cr�arri_.+cwa'�'.rs_a1•.' Vr. w+ tw► -aL.�- .�r s - �r� �- a1C = � -,� " :11.i- /�srrars:-�^ aa.�. r• w- 1/�+.o+•.+w�:.: _ ..1�'anrr'�.arr��raa.� ..a ...'i.�r , sti 4 Attachment 3 ..1. RECIPIENT -- RETAIN V� HITE COPY, RETURN PINK COPY i_ .c. it • fi "r. ;. i ��� ;!: �.` iz. Wo i 4 MEMORANDUM TO C Manager FROM: City Engineer. SUBJECT: Stop Sign Request -- Ripley& Atlantic DATE: June 4, 1984 �y g Action by Endors e d_......_�....�..._.... Modif i ed.�.... _ Rejected— Date Attached is a request from a .number of residents in the neighbor- hood surrounding the intersection of Ripley and Atlantic. Presently Atlantic traffic is stopped at Ripl The request is to also stop Ripley at the i ntersecti on. The concern is for the safety of children on bicycles due to poor sight distance and excessi vehicle speeds on Ripley. The city has adopted the State Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices as part of the City Code (Sec. 18 -2) . The manual is explicit in what warrants multiway stop signs. This intersection doesnot meet any of the criteria. It is recommended the City Council take no action on th matter. jw Attachment 19 11 LIN I We the residents at & near the cross streets of Riple & Atlantic in Maple'vATood, would, like to see a chan in traffic control at the intersection prementioned. Currentl there are stop si f or traff is on Atlantic; but the cross street Riple is a throu streets The children ridin their bic throu this area is our main concern Vision is hampered both to drivers & children on their bic due to lar pine trees on the south side of this intersection & bushes on the north sides It has been a lon time problem --- drivers well exceedin the speed limit on Riple If there were stop si on Riple makin this intersection.a 4---wa stop we would reduce the number of constant speeders & the risk of a child g ettin g hurt or even killed. We do realize this intersection is not a heav traffic area - --- -- but due to the hampered vision & the number of small children, we do feel that a 4-wa stop si is g reatl y needed to protect the children} from the drivers that do not wish to obe the 30 mile an hour zones V al, l �� ,� /a Sz/ �i1 � lc zv / v Z t' ' 4" MEMORANDUM 17 TO: City Manager er Action by Count: : FROM: Public Works Coordinator Endorse -- SUBJECT: 1984 Bituminous Overlay Program DATE: June 4, 1984 Modified ReJ acte d.....,......._+._._.._ Date The attached map shows the roadways proposed by this department for inclusion in the 1984 Overlay Program. In addition to those shown on the map, Barclay Street from Brooks Avenue northerly to its terminus at the parking l associated with Harvest Park is also included. This area was chosen because of a) the deterioration of the surfacing, b) thinness of the existing surface (many are only 1 -inch thick), c) concentration of need, thus yielding economic benefits due to no long equipment moves and d) all roads bounded by Edgerton Street, T.H. 36 Arcade Street and Ripley Avenue (extended) will have undergone major reconditioning in the last three years. The estimated cost, including Barclay Street, is $123,420.00. Approval and authorization to proceed with bids is recommended. Ye cc de 2 v sunk .�� l i k4 i t51 SKI t 7' r � s AVE. a i i s r -- ; c: `_ 41-0 al ` . ,till" I AV E. lot- BELLIC 62 Ci 411 or Lo* loll / rryr. ...; �*TnM A V F. /' __ - y Action by C O'anc i / MEMORANDUM Endorsed Modified Rej ecte d..._. bats T0: City Manager FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: McKnight Road Right -of- Way -- Conway to T. H. 36 (Project 81 -20) DATE: June 4, 1984 Ramsey County has submitted a revised right -of -way plan for approval to the city. It has been determined that additional right -of -way is required, over and above that previously approved, mainly for storm sewers and ponds. All right -of -way acquisition has stopped until each.of the agencies involved approves the new plans. The new plan indicates the city may be required to participate in right -of -way acquisition costs amounting to an estimated $131,600. Previously it was assumed _the city would participate for land costs associated with the storm drainage system.. The change is that the county will acquire the land and charge the city rather than the city acquire the land as is usually done. It is recommended the city council approve the McKnight Road right -of -way plan and cost estimates. h M. RAMSEY COUNTY May 14, 19 84 Ramsey County DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 3377 North Rice Street. Saint Paul, Minnesota 55112 (612) 484 -9104 Divisions of: Engineering Maintenance Mobile Equipment Environmental Services Mr. Kenneth Haider Director of Public Works City of Maplewood 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, M inn es of a 55109 McKnight Road Right of Way - Conway to T. H. 36 S.A.P. 62-668-20 Accompanying is a set of plans (prints) for this project along with our estimate of the acquisition costs. We request approval by the City of Maplewood. We will then proceed to Mn /DOT for their approval to utilize CSAH fiords for our acquisition costs and thence to the County hoard for plan approval and authorize to commence right -of -way acquisition. Based on a normal plan approval schedule we would hope to have Maplewood approval b y the middle of July and Mn /DOT approval by September 1. We would then anticipate ctobe ac isition rocedures mid-October 198 being in a position to start right-of-way qu p O r 4 and would estimate right of entry on selected segments of the project by September 1985. In the Maplewood portion of the project we would anticipate that CSAH funds would be eligible for acquisition costs with the exception of that portion on T. H. 5, which parcels are identified on page 4,of the estimate and for some portion of the costs on parcel 85A (drive -in theater site) associated with the storm sewer outf all line. We would like to call you` attention to the storm sewer involvement itemized on page 4 with the T. H. 5 ri gilt of way. We will be available as needed for your review title sheet -for signature upo your request. Wayne Leonard' P. E Coordinating Engineer process and will furnish the original WRL /clm Enclosure ! '* 1 1 ES"I'1 MA'Z'E OF ACQ MON McKNIGHT ROAD FROM CONWAY AVENUE TO T L 36 ' & A. P. 62- 668 -20 Amount 47158 There is no Parcel 41. The following parcels have no acquisition: 1 30 121 177 189 207 230 2 30A 123 178 190 208 233 4 69 167 179 193 209 234 5 70 168 180 194 210 236 10 71 169 181 195 211 237 11 72 170 182 200 212 2 42 12 88 171 183 201 217 243 13 89 172 184 202 221 246 14 90 173 185 203 223 248 16 °1 174 186 204 224 23 96 175 187 205 226 101 176 188 206 227 Parcels of Acquisition: Parcel Amount $ Parcel Amount t 3 300 6 650 40 49,400 7 500 42 48,000 8 550 43 6 9 300 44 300 15 1,900 45 300 17 300 46 4 18 i 800 47 2 19 31000 48 I,4 00 20 400 49 3 21 68,500 50 2, 500 22 13,250 51 1 24 65,700 52 1 25 5 54 1 2 "Do A 85,500 55 1 26 - 5 6, 800 56 1 27 71 57 1 28 7 5, 40 0 58 3 29 13,100 59 1 31 13,900 60 1 32 1 61 1 33 11 62 700 34 125,850 63 1,150 34A 1 64 400 35 400 65 2,100 36 100,000 66 2 37 1 67 700 38 3, 500 68 .300 38A 64,000 73 .550 39 169,000 74 1,850 1 Y ' 2 1 �srrMATE OF ACQ MOO - McKNIGHT ROAD FROM CONWAY AVENUE � TO T.H, 36 S.A.P. 62468 -20 Account 47158 Parcel Amount $ Parcel Amount $ 75 l 31950 128 51 000 , 76 39600 129 8,200 77 1,000 130 300 78 21600 131 3 300 79 11600 1 32 1900 So 2 13.3 350 81 21950 134 3 3 100 82 31350 135 1450 ' 83 2,200 . 136 1,I00 84 14,650 137 2,000 85 24,550 138 X 700 85A 2 42, 1 600 139 800 86 409800 140 1,100 87 2 141 1 92 30Q 142 1 93 304 143 1 500 ' 94 300 144 500 95 30 0 145 2100 ' 97 300 145A 450 98 3 I50 ' 146 700 99 25,000 147 850 100 ' 127800 148 1,300 102 7 14 9 1,450 103 5 0 150 150 1 104 61050 150A 2,100 105 915 50 151 1 106 25,400 152 1 .107 96,500 153 1,850 108 6 6, 70 0 1 109 73,900 155 1 150 ' 110 6 7 156 1,100 111 104 200 s 157 950 112 7,800 158 550 1I3 719100 159 350 114 131400 1 fi0 2 1 200 115 300 161 850 116 81 000 t 162 39150 11 ?1, 1 Oo 163 2 000 ' 218 5 6, 80 0 164 2 119 45 165 4 850 ' 120 11 1 66 Zz 450 166A .10,700 6 124 81 650 191 450 125 41400 192 300 126 4 196 300 127 9 2 * parcels 25A, 26, 27 & 247 involve provisions for drainage which may involve the City of Maplewood cost participation. 4 ES-MATIE OF ACQ MON McKNIGHT ROAD FROM CONWAY AVENUE TO T.H. 36 S. A.P. 62-668-20 Account 47158 The estimated $2,551,750 right of way cost for McKnight Road includes $531,900 for Stillwater Road MIL 5) right of way. Parcel Amount $ 17 300 18 1 19 3,000 20 400 21 68,500 22 13,250 24 65,700 25 5,200 Hi wa RIB' Dra inage R /W* 25A 85,500 76 $ 9,000 26 56,800 9 46,900 27 71 58,200 13,300 247 62,400 62,400_ $144,600 + $131,600 = $276,200 86 4 0, 800 87 2, 900 92 300 93 300 94 300 95 300 97 300 98 3,150 99 25,000 100 12,800 196 300 197 700 198 2,500 199 1 218 3 219 1 220 500 222 300 $531,900 Total Estimated Nin/DOT T. IL 5 R/W Cost * parcels 25A, 26, 27 & 247 involve provisions for drainage which may involve the City of Maplewood cost participation. 4 • �n Y l7 \ R/W Cast Summary R Total $2,551 531 900 P1n /DOT* X2,019, 850 Ramsey County* * Due to provi si ons for storm drainage, some portion may be the responsibility of the C i t y ' of Nl apl e w ood. Additional costs not reimbursable from CSAH f unds. nds. Total $2 2 Acquisition $ 159,750 Say $160,000 JAP:m 4/20/84 I s JAP MC CONWAY/36 5 .Z SCWW' MEMORANDUM TO: City FROM: City Engineer ' SUBJECT: McKnight Road Water Main Project 83 -4 DATE: June 4, 1984 .Action by ccun,il: Endorsed_ Modif'ie- ReJ e Date The county has suspended right —of —way acquisition along McKnight Road. A number of parcels not yet acquired are needed to construct Project 83 -4. The city has two options at this point. First, the city can proceed with Project 83 -4. T h i s would require the c i t y to acquire between 15 and 20 easements. The estimated cost is $75,000 to 100,000. The timing is such that construction would not commence until 1985. Second, the city could again postpone construction of Project 83 -4 until 1986, in conjunction with construction of McKnight Road. This would save the acquisition cost and provide some additional savings in construction cost. It is recommended the city council consider the second option. This will result in considerable savings. The action required is a formal denial of Project 83 -4. MEMORANDUM ,&ct i on by r o l nc ` Endorse - Modif le Rei ecte Date TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Hillwood Drive Improvements -- Project No. 78 -10 DATE: May 14, 1984 The above -named project has been essentially completed to our department's satisfaction. Two minor landscaping items remain to be corrected along McKnight Road and in Oxford's Pond. We have estimated that this correction work can be completed for $1,,000.00. Therefore, the contractor has requested a reduction in the retained funds to $1,000.00. We recommend that the council adopt the attached resolution authorizing reduction of the retained funds to $1,000.00 jw attachment 1:0.1 eo RESOLTUION DIRECTING REDUCTION OF RETAINAGE WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project No. 78 -10, H i 1 l wood Drive Improvements, and has a construction contract therefore pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, said project has been essentially completed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the City Clerk is hereby authorized to approve reduction of retained funds to $1,000.00.