Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1984 05-14 City Council Packet
AGENDA Maplewood City Council 7:00 P.M., Monday , May 14, 1984 Municipal Administration Building Meeting 84 -10 A) CALL TO ORDER B) ROLL CALL C) APPROVAL OF MINUTESES I. Minutes 84 -09, April1 23 198p 4 D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA E) CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent A •genda are considered to be routine by theCityCouncandwillbeenactedbyonemotionintheformlistedbelow. Therewillbenoseparatediscussionontheseitems. If discs 'discussioneon i s desired, thatitemwillberemovedfromtheConsentA •Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Accounts Payable — 2. Budget Transfer - Administrative Intern 30 Donation from Maplewood Coin Club 4. Public Hearing I DR - Kinder Care 5. Home Occupation Renewal - 1564 E. Grandview 6. Time Extension: Bennington Woods 70 Employee Option to Defer Severance Pay EA) CHARLES WIGER -MET COUNCIL JUDY FLETCHER - M.W.C.C. F) PUBLIC HEARINGS 10 I.D.R. Refi - Commercial Partners - 7 20 Code Amendment: P.U.D. - 7:15 30 Code Amendment: L.B.C. District - 2nd Reading (4 Votes) G) AWARD OF BIDS 1 (H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS f( 10 Holloway Ave. Assessments 2. County State Aid DesignationC 3. Street & Alley Vacations: Burr & RipleypY I NEW BUSINESS 1. McClelland Ct . Waterma i n 2. Detachment & Annexation: 2091 Belmont Lane 3. Plan Amendment: E. of DeSoto & S. of Rosel awn 4. Tax Forfeit Land - Junction St. 5. 1983 Annual Financial Report & Audit L) ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS T MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, April 23, 1984 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 84 -09 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota wa.s held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. 8. ROLL CALL. John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present MaryLee Maida, Councilmember Present Michael T. Was i 1 uk , Councilmember Present T C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1 Minutes No. 84 -07 (April 2, 1984 ) Councilmember Maida moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 84 -07 (April 2, 1984) as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - a11. 2.. Minutes No. 84 -08 (April 9, 1984 ) Councilmember Maida moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 8408 (April 9, 1984) as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. Letter to Mrs, Galbraith 2.. Beam Avenue Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - ail. E. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Anderson moved, seconded by Councilmember, Bastian, Ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda, items 1 through 5, as recommended. 1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part I, Fees, Services, Expenses, Check register dated April 11, 1984 and April 12, 1984 - $309,336.45:, Part II Payroll - Check dated April 20, 1984-- $63,934,56) in the amount of $373,,271.01. am 1 - 4/23 2. Time Extension: Maple Ridge Mall Final Plat Approved a one year time extension for the Maple Ridge Mall final p l a t . A recordable deed to transfer Out l of A to Ramsey County s h a l l be submitted prior to the City signing the plat. 3. Final Acceptance - Cope Avenue Resolution No. 84 -4 -55 WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract approved by the City on May 28, 1980 C & H Contracting, Inc. of Elk River, Minnesota, has satisfactorily completed Maplewood Improvement Project 79 -1 in accordance with said contract; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, the work com- pleted under said contract is hereby accepted and approved. 4. Interceptor Maintenance Agreement - 1984 Approved the Metropolitan Waste Control Interceptor Maintenance Agreement of 1984. 5. Commercial Revenue Note - Hearing Date - St. Paul Business Association Resolution No. 84 -4 -56 RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF A NOTICE OF THE HEARING WHEREAS, a) Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, known as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (the "Act ") gives m u n i c i p a l i t i e s the power to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of the encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to prevent so far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; b) The City Council of the City of Maplewood (the "City ") has received from St Paul Business Center, a general partnership organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the "Company ") a proposal that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter descr i bed; through the issuance of its industrial revenue bonds (which may be in the form of a single debt instrument) (the "Bonds ") pursuant to the Act; c) Before proceeding with consideration of the request of the Company it is necessary for the City to h o l d a p u b l i c hearing on the proposal pursuant to Section 474.01; Subdivision 7b, Minnesota Statutes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood,, Minn- esota, as follows: 1. A public hearing on the proposal of the Company will be held at the time and Place set forthe in the Notice of Hearing hereto attached. 2. The general nature of the proposal and an estimate of the p r i n c i p a l amount of bonds to. be issued to finance the proposal are described in the attached form of 9 - 4I ?3 Notice of Hearing* 3. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Energy and Economic Development Authority, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together with proposed forms of all attachments and exhibits thereto, is on file i n the office of the City Clerk . 4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the hearing to be given one publication in the official newspaper and a newspaper of general cir- culation available in the City, not less than 15 days nor more than 30 days prior to the date fixed for the hearing, substantially in the form of the attached Notice of Public Hearing. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this 23rd day of April, 1984. s/ John C. Greavu ayor ATTEST. Lucille E. Aurelius /s/ City Clerk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NOTICE is hereby given that the City Counc.i 1 of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, will meet at the City H a l l in the City of Map i ewood, ' Minnesota at O'clock on June 11, 1984, to consider the proposal of St. Paul Business Center, that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter described by the issuance of industrial development revenue bonds. Description of Project The proposed project in the aggregate shall consist of the acquisition of land and the construction of 3 buildings, approximately 90,000 square feet in the aggregate, to be leased as office/service space to various tenants to be initially owned and operated by St. Paul Business Center.. $2,900,000 of bonds will be used to finance land and construct 2 buildings with an approximate aggregate square footage of 70,000 square feet, to be located immediately north of the NCR b u i l d i n g on Sloan Place.. 1,000,000 of bonds will be used to acquire land and construct 1 building with an approximate square footage of 20,000 square feet, to be located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Skillman Avenue and McMenemy Street._ The maximum aggregate estimated principal amount of bonds or other o b l i g a t i o n s to be i.ss ued to finance this project is $3,900,,000. The project will be i n i t i a l l y owned and operated by St. Paul Business Center. The bonds or other o b l i g a t i o n s if and when issued will not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance upon any property of the City except the project and such bonds or obligations will not be'a charge against the City's general credit or taxing powers but w i l l be payable from sums to be paid by St. Paul Business Center pursuant to a revenue agreement. 3 - 4/23 A draft copy of the proposed application to the Energy and Economic Development Authority, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together , with all attach- ments and exhibits thereto, is available for public inspection beginning April 24, 1984, from 9:00 o'clock a.m. to 4:30 o'clock p.m., Monday through Friday, at the City Hall in Maplewood, Minnesota. At the time and place fixed for the P u b l i c Hearing, the City Council of the City of Maplewood will give all persons who appear at the hearing an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal. Dated this 23rd day of April, 1984. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL) By /s/ Lucille Aurelius City Clerk F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M. Conditional Use Permit Revision and Time Extension: Rolling Hills a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Richard Pearson to increase the number of permitted m o b i l e home units from 245 to 246; revise the original conditions to require: a) deadline for constructing all requ i red on -site improvements for occupied lots b) .prohibit on street parking near intersection and c) require off street parking during the spring thaw and renewal of the conditional use permit to continue construction of the Rolling Hills Mobile Home Park. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Chairman Les Axdah 1 presented the f o l l o w i n g Planning Commission recommendation: Commissioner Whitcomb moved the P l a n n i n g Commission recommend approval of the renewal and revision of the conditional use permit for Rolling Hills mobile homie. park as outlined in the following resolution: WHEREAS, Richard Pearson has requested a conditional use permit renewal to continue the construction of Rolling H i l l s mobile home park at the f o l l o w i n g de- scribed property: The northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 24, Township 29, Range 22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the above described conditional use permit be renewed, subject to the following con- ditions: 1. Prior to the spring thaw and until July 1, 1984, improved (gravel or similar material) off. - street parking pads shall be provided for each vehicle associated with an occupied unit. Unrestricted emergency vehicle access must be available at all times. 20 By July 1, 1984, the following improvements shall be made for each lot upon which a unit is located,, whether or not it is occupied: 4 - 4/23 a. The street is paved in front of the lot. b. Construction of a paved off - street parking pad at least sixteen feet wide and twenty feet deep. c. Installation of all required landscaping (trees, shrubs, berms and sod) for the Ivy and Century Avenue boundaries and for each lot. After July 1, 1984, conditions 3 a -d shall be met prior to issuance of a b u i l d i n g permit for any lot, except the sodding and p l a n t i n g of a tree must be completed within thirty days of a lot being occupied, or a letter of credit or cash escrow must be deposited with the Director of Community Development to ensure installation. If conditions one and two are not met, no additional building permits shall be issued for the park.- 3. There shall be no exterior storage of equipment, such as bikes, hoses, lawnmowers, rakes, etc. 4. Each lot shall be allowed one exterior storage shed for no more than 120 square feet. 5. No access shall be allowed to Century Avenue. 60 No construction or grading shall be allowed to disturb the tamarack grove. 7. The private sanitary sewer, water mains and streets shall be constructed to be consistent with the Maplewood and. St. Paul water Utility standards to ensure a reasonable level of service, 8. The private streets must be at least 28 feet in width, with parking on one side only. No park i shall be permitted in the vicinity of intersections. The Director of P u b l i c Safety shall specify the no parking distances for each intersection. Signs shall be posted by the park owner. 9. All utility i n s t a l l a t i o n s shall be underground. 10. Water lines must be flushed at least once each year or as required by the environmental health officer, 11. All storm water discharge must be directed to the wetland to the west. No connection to the city storm sewer s h a l l be allowed, 12. All mobile homes must be new, skirted and tied down. Skirting shall extend from the frame of the chassis to the ground. Skirting must be painted to match or compliment the mobile home. 13. All tie -downs and foundations must meet the State B u i l d i n g Code. 14. The storm shelter must remain free of storaage and a v a i l a b l e to use,, 15. The sign regulations for the R -3 district shall apply. 16. The following minimum setbacks shall apply: a . , Twenty feet to a private street b. Thirty feet to a public right-of-way c. Five -foot side. yard setback on the side opposite the entry d. Twenty -foot side yard setback on the entry side. 5 4/23 17. No structures shall be allowed in a required setback, except for an accessory building in the twenty -foot side yard setback. Such accessory building must have a side yard setback of at least five feet. 18. Sales of mobile homes shall be limited to those owned by park residents and those sold by the park owner for placement in the park. 19. The developer shall provide traffic control s i g.ns as required by the Director of Public Safety. 20. Compliance with all pertinent state statutes and /or regulations. 21. No variation shall be, permitted from the site plan dated 3 -21 -83 without Community Design Review Board approval. 22. The number .of m o b i l e homes shall not exceed 246, 23. This conditional use permit shall be reviewed in one year to determine compliance with conditions and whether a change in conditions is necessary to resolve problems that may have developed. Commissioner Fischer seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Ellefson, Fischer, He jny, Pei 1 ish, Sigmundik, Whitcomb. d. Mr. Richard Pearson, 1959 White Bear Avenue, the applicant, spoke on behalf of his proposal. e. Councilmember Bastian moved to amend condition No. 14a to read: Construction on the below grade storm shelter shall begin by May 11, 1984 and shall be completed by June 22, 1984, unless the Director of Public Safety extends the deadline due to circumstances beyond the control of the developer." Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. f. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. h. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. 1. Counc i lmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 84 -4 -56 WHEREAS, Richard Pearson has requested a. conditional use permit renewal to continue the construction of the Rolling Hills Mobile How Park at the following described property: The Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 24, Township .29, Range 22. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows 1. This conditional use permit renewal was requested by Richard Pearson, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 6 - 4/23 2, This conditional use permit renewal was reviewed by the Maplewood P l a n n i n g Commission on March 5 , 1984. The P l a n n i n g Commission recommended to the City Council that said permit be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council h e l d a p u b l i c hearing on Apr i 1 23, 1984 to consider this c o n d i t i o n a l use permit renewal. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an oppor- tunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations fo the City Staff and P l a n n i n g Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above described conditional use permit be renewed, subject to the following cond i t i ons 1. Prior to the spring thaw and until July 1, -1984, improved (gravel or similar material) off - street parking pads sha 1.1 be provided for each vehicle associated with an occupied unit. Unrestricted emergency vehicle access must be a v a i l a b l e at all times. 2. A mobile home shall not be moved onto a lot after April 23, 1984 until, a street is paved in front of the lot. 3. There shall be no exterior storage of equipment, such as bikes, hoses, lawnmowers, rakes, etc. 4. Each lot shall be allowed one exter i or storage shed for no more than 120 square feet. Such shed must be kept in workmanlike repair and painted. 5. No access shall be allowed to Century Avenue. 6 No construction or grading shall be allowed to disturb the tamarack grove. 7. The private sanitary sewer, water mains and street shall be constructed to be consistent with the Maplewood and St. Paul Water Utility standards to ensure a reasonable level of service. 8. All utility installations shall be underground. 9. The private streets must be at least: 28 feet in width, with parking on one side only. No parking shall be permitted in the vicinity of intersections, The director of p u b l i c safety shall specify the no parking distances for each intersection. Signs shall be posted by the park owner. 10. Water lines must be flushed at least once each year or as required by the Env i ronmenta 1 Health O f f i c i a l ' . 11. All storm water discharge must be directed. to the wetland to the west. No connection to the City storm sewer shall be allowed, 12. All. mobile homes must be new, skirted and tied down. Skirting shall extend from the frame of the chassis to the ground. Skirting must be painted to complement the mobile home. 13. All tie -downs and foundations must meet the State B u i l d i n g Code. 14. a. Construction on the below -grade storm shelter shall begin by May 1 1 , 1984 and shall be completed by June 22, 1984, unless the Director of P u b l i c Safety extends the deadline due to circumstances beyond the control. of the developer. 7 - 4%23 b, The design of the below-grade structure must be approved by the Director f of Emergency Services, i n c l u d i n g emergency l i g h t i n g , v e n t i l a t i o n and sanitary facilities. c. The above -grade portion of the building must receive approval from the design review board before construction. d. The storm shelter must remain free of storage and a v a i l a b l e for use. e. No further permits for additional mobile homes shall be issued until the shelter is completed. 15. The sign regulations for the R -3 district shall apply. 16. The following minimum setbacks shall apply: a, Twenty feet to a private street b, Thirty feet to a p u b l i c right-of-way c, Five -foot side yard setback on the side opposite the entry d. Twenty -foot side yard setback on the entry side 17. No structures shall be allowed in a required setback, except for an accessory building in the twenty foot side yard setback. Such accessory building must have a side yard setback of at least five feet. 18. Sales of mobile homes shall be limited to those owned by park residents and those sold by the park owner for placement in the park. 19.. The developer shall provide traffic control signs as required by the Director of Public Safety. 20. Compliance with all pertinent State Statutes and /or regulations. 2 1 . No variation shall be permitted from the site p l a n dated 3 -21 -83 without Community Design Review Board approval. 22. The number of mobile homes shall not exceed 246. 23, This conditional use permit shall be reviewed in one year to determine compli- ance with conditions and whether a change in conditions i's necessary to resolve problems that may have developed. 24. a. After April 23, 1984, the f o l l o w i n g improvements must be installed within thirty days after a m o b i l e home is placed on a lot-: 1) A paved driveway and off - street parking pad at least sixteen -feet wide and twenty -feet deep 2) A thirty -inch wide sidewalk from the mobile, home entrance to the parking pad 3) All required landscaping (trees, shrubs, berms and sod), including the perimeter landscaping on Ivy and Century Avenues. If the landscaping cannot be completed within thirty days, a letter of credit or cash escrow shall be deposited with the Director of Community Development to ensure installation. b. Improvements (1) through (3). in item 24. a, and paved streets must be installed by July 1, 1984 for all mobile homes placed on a lot prior to April 8 _ 4/23 23, 1984, 25. If any of the above conditions are not met, no additional mobile homes shall be moved into the park. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 2, 7:15 P.M, P l a n Amendment and Rezoning: County Road B and VanDyke a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposal to amend the plan and rezone the property at the northwest corner of VanDyke Street and County Road B. Proposed plan amendment from SC, service commercial and RM residential medium density to LSC limited service commercial. Proposed rezone from B C business - commercial and R -3 multiple to LBC limited business commercial. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Chairman Les Axdah 1 presented the f o l l o w i n g P l a n n i n g Commission recommendation: Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend the City Council deny the proposed plan amendment. Commissioner Eilefson seconded.' Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Ellefson, Fischer, Pellish, Sigmundik, Whitcomb." Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend the City Council take no rezoning action on the R -3 section until a plat is brought in by the developer, Commissioner E l lefson seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdah l , Barrett, E l l efson, Fischer, Pellish, Sigmundik, Whitcomb." d. Mr. Ken Gervais, who holds an option on the property, spoke regarding the proposal. e. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard. The following voiced their opinions: Mr. G eorge Klein, owner of the property at 2210 White Bear Avenue Mr. Duane Evenson, representing Mrs. Annie Evenson, his mother, stated they wished to have the property remain with the same zoning. f. Mayor Greavu closed the p u b l i c hearing. g. Mayor Greavu moved that no changes be made in the Land Use designation or the zoning. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - ail. 30 7:30 Street and Alley Vacation: Ripley and Burr a, Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Richard.. and Gloria LeFebvre, 1358 E Larpenteur Avenue to vacate the alley in Block 2, Kings Addition to the City of St. Paul; vacate the 140 foot portion of Burr Street lying directly south of Ripley Avenue; vacate Ripley Avenue lying between Burr and Bradley Streets; and vacate Ripley Avenue between DeSoto and Burr Streets. 9 - 4/23 b. Director of Community Developnent Geoff Olson presented the staff report. c. Chairman Les Axdah l presented the following P l a n n i n g Commission recommendation: Commissioner Hejny moved the Planning Commission forward the following resolution to the City Council: WHEREAS, Richard and Gloria jean LeFebvre initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following described real property, all in Section 17, Town- ship 29, Range 22: 1. The alley in block three, Kings Addition to the City of St. Paul. 2. Ripley Avenue lyi na between the westerly alignment of Burr Street and Bradley Street. 3. That portion of Burr Street as measured from the southerly alignment of the alley i n block three, Kings addition to the City of St. Paul northerly to Ripley Avenue. WHEREAS, the following adjacent properties are affected: 1. Block three, Kings Addition to the City of St. Paul 2.Lots one through four of block five, Kings Addition to the City of St. Paul 3. Subject to streets and easements and except the west 163 feet lying south of the north 30 feet and except the east 163 feel~ of the west 489 feet of the south 85 feet of the north 455 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 17, Township 29, Range 22, Unplatted Lands. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above described streets and alley, public interest in the property will accrue to the f o l l o w i n g described abutt'i ng properties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood P l a n n i n g Commission that it is in the best interest to grant the above described vacation on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. Construction of these rights of way for roadway purposes is infeasible. 2. It would be in the pu:bl i s interest. This vacation is subject to,: 1. Retaining utility easements over Ripley Avenue, the alley and Burr Street south of north - line of alley ). 2. The applicant granting the owner of 1781 Burr Street a perpetual driveway easement over Ripley Avenue lying between Burr Street and Bradley Street and over that portion of Burr Street right of way west of the northerly 20 feet of lot six, block three of Kings Addition to the City of St. Paul. Commissioner Robens seconded.. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Fischer, Hejny, Larson, Pel l ish, Robens, Sigmundik, Sletten, Whitcomb. The Commission questioned - if the balance of the propsoed vacations should wait 10 - 4/23 until after the p l a t to the north i.s f i n a l i z ed . This may help in obtaining the required access for the plat to the north. Commissioner Pe l l i s h moved the Planning Commission recommend the Council consider this as another method of securing 60 foot access between 1790 and 1822 DeSoto for the Twin Oaks plat. Commissioner Whitcomb seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Fischer, Hejny, Larson, Pellish, Robens, Sigmundik, Sletten, Whitcomb." d. Mr. Richard LeFebvre, the applicant, spoke on behalf of the proposal. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard: Mr. Albert Grenz, 1771 Burr Street Mrs. Mae Wa l l ack , 1773 Burr Street Mr. Richard O 1 son, 1703 Bradley, g. Councilmember Wasiluk moved to table this item until the meeting of May 14, 1984 to allow staff time to investigate pons i e easements Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 4. 7:45 P.M. Rezoning and Preliminary Plat - Twin Oaks a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Mr. Thomas Coil to rezone the property south of Roselawn Avenue and west of Edgerton Street from F -farm to R -1 single dwelling and for preliminary plat approval for ten (10) single dwelling lots. b. Director of Community Development Geoff Olson presented the staff report. c. Chairman Les Axdah l presented the following P l a n n i n g Commission recommendation: Commissioner Pel.lish moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that if the park search area south of R ose l awn Avenue and east of DeSoto Street is deleted from the Comprehensive Plan,., alternative A (Bellwood Avenue and Burr Street) for the Twin Oaks Addition preliminary plat should be approved, subject to: 1. The plat shall be revised as necessary so that all lots meet minimum lot re- quirements, 2. The "exception" designation on lot two, block one, shall be removed. 3. The north -south street shall be designated as Burr Street on the final plat. 4. Submission of a developer's agreement and required surety for public improvements for this p l a t . This agreement shall include requirements for land survey monuments to be located at the corners of each lot and the provision of a temporary cu 1- de -sac at the south property line for Burr Street, 5. A signed developer's agreement must have been received by the City Engineer for the construction of _ Bellwood Avenue from Edgerton Street to the applicant's east property l i n e or for the construction of a street from DeSoto Street to connect with the proposed Burr Street 11- 4/23, r 6. City Engineer approval of final grading, utility and drainage plans. 7. Proof that contracts have been entered into with the telephone company and NSP. 8. The accessory structures on the easterly portion of lot two, block one shall be removed before f i n a l plat approva 1. I 9. Submission of an erosion control plan, with the final grading plan, that con- siders the recommendations of the S o i l Conservation Service. Commissioner Whitcomb seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Fischer, Hejny, Larson, Pell ish, Robens, Sigmundik, Sletten, Whitcomb. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that if Council chooses to retain the park search area, alternative B (Bellwood Avenue as a cul -de -sac) for the Twin oaks preliminary plat should be approved, subject to the following conditions : 1. A signed developer's agreement must have been received by the City Engineer for the construction of Bellwood Avenue from Edgerton Street to the east property line of this site. 2. Submittal of a developer's agreement with required surety, for p u b l i c street, u t i l i t y , drainage and trail improvements internal to this plat. The agreement shall require land survey monuments to be placed at the corners of each lot and require the construction of the trail at the time that Bellwood Avenue is constructed. 3. A ten -foot wide trail easement shall be dedicated from the Bellwood Avenue cul-de-sac to the south boundary of the p l a t , The location and design specifications shall be approved by the Director of Community Services. 4. City Engineer approval of f i n a l grading, drainage and utility plans. 5 . Proof must be submitted prior to f i n a l p l a t approval that contracts have been entered into with the telephone company and N SP, 6. Submission of an erosion control plan, with the grading plan, which considers the recommendations of the Soil Conservation Service. Commissioner Sigmundik seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Fischer, Hejny, Larson, Pell ish, Robens, Sigmundik, Sletten, Whitcomb. Commissioner Whitcomb moved the Planning Commission forward the following resolution to . the City Council: WHEREAS, Thomas C o i l initiated a rezoning from F, farm residence to R -1, res- idence district (single dwelling) for the following-described property: The South 112 of the South 112 of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the E 1/5 acres of the North 1/2 of the South 112 of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4, all i n Section 17, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Mi nne'sota . This property is also known as 1858 DeSoto Street, Maplewood; 12 - 4/23 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the above described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings-of- fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have and economical extension of p u b l i c sewers, police and fire protection Commissioner Fischer seconded. Larson, Pellish,, Robens, Sigmundik no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, services and f a c i l i t i e s , such as p u b l i c water, and schools. Ayes - Commissioners Axdah 1,. Fischer, Hejay, S 1 etten , Whitcomb. Commissioner Axdahl moved the Planning Commission indicate to the Council for the alignment of Burr Street, the concept on page 10 of the staff report is. prefer- red. The Council should resolve a means of acquisition of a 60 foot easement between 1790 and 1822 DeSoto Street to the parcel. Commissioner Pellish seconded. Ayes Commissioners Axdahl, Fischer, Hejny, Larson, Pellish, Robens, Sigmundik, Sletten, Whitcomb." d. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following voiced their opinions: Mr. Carl Peterson, 1399 Geneva Mr. Cummings, 1720 Duluth Mr. Arthur Ready, Manager, Forest Lawn Cemetary. e. Mayor Greavu closed the p u b l i c hearing. f. Counc i lmember Anderson moved to approve Alternative A for the Twin Oaks prelim- inary plat subject to: 1. The plat sha 1 i be revised as necessary so that all lots meet minimum dimension requirements. 2. The "exception" designation on lot two, block one, shall be removed 3. The north -south street shall be designated as Burr Street on the final plat. 4. Submission of a developer's agreement and required surety for public improve- ments for this plat. This agreement shall i nc 1 ude requirements for land survey monuments to be located at the corners of each lot and the provision of a temporary cul -de -sac at the south property line for Burr Street.. 50 A signed developer's agreement must have been received by the City Engineer for the construction of Bellwood Avenue from Edgerton Street to the applicant's east property line or for the construction of a street from DeSoto Street to connect with the proposed Burr Street. 13- 4/23 6. City Engineer approval of f i n a l grading, utility and drainage plans. 7. Proof that contracts have been entered into with the telephone company and NSP. 8. The accessory structures on the easterly portion of lot two, block one shall be removed before f i n a l p l a t approval, 9. Submission of an erosion control plan, with the final grading plan, that con- s i ders the recommendations of the S o i l Conservation Service. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Awes - all,v g. Counc i lmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 -4 -57 WHEREAS, Thomas C o i l initiated a rezoning from F, farm residence to R -1, residence district (single dwelling) for the following-described property: The South 112 of the South 112 of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 and the east 1/5 acres of the north 112 of the south 112 of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4, all in Section 17, Township 49, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota This property is a l s o known as 1858 DeSoto Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by Thomas Coil, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the.Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on April 16, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezon- ing be approved. 3 . The Maplewood City Counc i 1. held a pub 1 i c hearing on Apr i 1 23, 19.84 to consider t h i s rezoning. Not.i ce thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommend- ations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the f o l l ow i n g 9findin s , of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intentpP of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not. substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the p u b l i c welfare., am 14 - 4/23 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the l o g i c a l , efficient, and economical extension of p u b l i c services and f a c i l i t i e s , such as public water, sewers, police and fire portection and schools. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 5. 8:00 P.M. Cond i t i ona 1 Use Permit: H i ghwood Avenue a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of MCI /Ce i 1 com C e l l u l a r for approval of a conditional use permit for a radio/tel- ephone communications system consisting of a 280 foot t a l l tower with two small accessory buildings and eight by ten. foot building to contain the generator and an eleven by twenty four foot building for equipment to be 1 oca ted on H i ghwood Avenue-west of Centur1, Avenue. b.. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c, Chairman Les Axdah 1 presented the following P l a n n i n g Commission recommendation: Commissioner Pel fish moved the Planning Commission forward the following resolut- ion to the City Council: WHEREAS, MCI /Cell com C e l l u l a r initiated a conditional use permit to erect a radio/telephone communications f a c i l i t y at the. following described property: All of lots one (1), five (5), six (6), sight (8 ), and nine (9), Carver Lots lying northerly of property described in Book 1795; RCR Page 365 and also commencing at the NW corner of the E 1/2 of the E 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 13, Township 28, Range 22 West of the Fourth Principal Meridian; thence running east on the north line of said 1/4 section 16 rods; thence South parallel with the West line of the E 1/2 of the E 112 of said 1/4 section (being the southeast 1/4 of said section) 10 rods; thence west parallel with said North line 16 rods to the West line of said East 1/2 of the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of said section; thence. north 10 rods to the point of beginning and containing one acre of land, more or less; excepting therefrom the West 64 feet of the West 264 feet of the North 165 feet of the East 112 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, as shown by the records in the Real Estate Division in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said County and State. And excepting any part of the Government Lot One (1) that lies West of the West 264 feet of the North 165 feet of the East 1/2 of the North 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 13, Township 28, Range 22 This property is located on Highwood Avenue, west of Century Avenue in Maplewood; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the above described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with the pur- pose and standards of the zoning code. 2. The establishment and maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the pub 1 i c health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of the F, farm zoning district. 15 4/23 t 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potent- ial surrounding land uses, due to noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water p o l l u t i o n , water run off, vibration, genera l u n s i g h t l i n e s s , electrical i nterfer- ence or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal v e h i c u l a r traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that would cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be served by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, u t i l i t i e s , schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for p u b l i c facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 11. The use would provide a convenience for the public. Approval is subject to Council review after the first year of t h i s approval. Commissioner Fischer seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Ellefson, Fischer, Pel l i sh, Robens, Sigmundik, Sletten, Whitcomb," d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called.for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the p u b l i c hearing. g. Counc i lmember Bastian introduced the f o l l o w i n g resolution and moved its adoption 84 -4 - 58 WHEREAS, MC I /Cellcom Cellular initiated a conditional use permit to erect a radio /telephone communications facility at the follow'ng described property: All of lots One (1), Five (5), Six (6), Eight (8), and Nine (9),, Carver Lots lying Northerly of property described in Book 1795; RCR Page 365 and also commencing at the NW corner of the E 112 of the E 112 of the SE 1I4 of Section 13, Township. 28, Range 22 West of the Fourth Principal Meridian; thence running East on the North line of said 1/4 Section 16 rods; thence South parallel with the West line of the E 112 of the E 1/2 of said 1/4 section (being the Southeast 1/4 of said section) 10 rods; thence West parallel with said North line 16 rods to the West line of said East 112 of the East 112 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section; thence North 10 rods to the point of beginning and containing one acre of land, more or less; excepting therefrom the West 64 feet of the West 264 feet of the North 155 feet of the East 112 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, as shown by the records in the Real Estate Division in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said County and State. And excepting any part of the Government Lot One (1) that lies West of the West 264 feet of - the North 165 feet of the East 112 of the North East 1/4 of the South 16 - 4/23 East 1/4 of Section 13, Township 28, Range 22. This property is located on Highwood Avenue, west of Century Avenue in Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this c o n d i t i o n a l use permit is as f o l l o w s : 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by MCI /Cellcom Cellular, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reveiwed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on , 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said permit be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council h e l d a p u b l i c hearing on April 23, 1984, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the f o l l o w i n g findings of fact: 1 . The use is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive P l a n and with the purpose and standards of the zoning code. 2. The establishment and maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the p u b l i c health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of the F, farm zoning district, 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potent- ial surrounding land uses, due to noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water p o l l u t i o n , water runoff, vibration, genera 1 unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that would cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be served by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design, 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects, 11. The use would provide a convenience for the public, 17 - 4/23 Approval is subject to Council review after the first year of this approval, Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. G. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Paramedic Vans a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 84 -4 -5g BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Thone Hawkins Chevrolet, 1801 E. County Road F in the amount of $27,114 was the lowest responsible bid for the purchase of two (2) three- quarter ton wagon /trucks and the proper City Officials are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Concealed Weapons (2nd Reading) a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO.565 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE 4 WEAPONS AND EXPLOSIVES SECTION 20.75 CONCEALED WEAPONS OF THE MAPLEWOOD CITY CODE THE CITY.COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the Maplewood City Code of ordinances is hereby amended by de 1 eating thereof in its present form and entirety Section 20 -75 of Article 4 Weapons and Explosives, and by substituting in lieu of the same the following: Section 20 -75. Prohibited weapons, prohibited acts: It shall be unlawful, for any person within the City to possess any device or weapon known as a s 1 ungshot, slingshot sand club, meta 1 knuckles, switchblade knife, dagger, stiletto, dirk, blackjack, chain club, pipe club, bowie knife, Molotov cocktail, grenade, throwi n-g star, or similar device. It shall be unlawful for any person within the City to carry or wear concealed about his person any pistol, BB, air or CO 2 gun. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Seconded by Councilmember Was i 1 uk . Ayes - all, 18 - 4/23 2. Hook 'n Ladder Lounge a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mr. Dennis Johnson, attorney representing Roger Claussen, owner of the Hook n Ladder . Lounge spoke on behalf of his client, c. Councilmember Bastian moved to collect $1000.00 from Mr. Claussen in lieu of forfeiture of his bond for the violation o sa e of alcoholic everage to m1 nors ana tnat the money De aonatea to the Last community amiiy tenter. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - a11. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Concordia Arms Crosswalk a. Manager Evans presented a letter and petition requesting better identification of the crosswalk on Lydia Avenue between Concordia Arms and Plaza 3000. Crossing signs on both sides of Lydia Avenue would be appropriate since t_he Cros sw4 l k i at mid-block, It is recommended the City authorize the i n s t a l l a t i o n of pedestrian crossing signs on Lydia Avenue at the crosswalk between Concordia Arms and Plaza 3000. b. Mayor Greavu moved to authroize the installation of pedestrian crossing signs on Lydia Avenue a e crosswalk between Concordia Arms and P I laza Seconded by Councilmember W a s i l u k . Ayes - all. 2. Approval of Clinic in an LBC Zone - Cope Avenue a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved approval of an outpatient surgical center in an LBC Zone as requested by S Build to b locat on the south side o Fe venue, east of ennar Street, Seconded by Councilmember W a s i l u k . Ayes - all. 3. Code Amendment: Offi and Clinics i n LBC Zone a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b 0 Councilmember Ma i da moved first reading of an ordinance amending the code to allow office, clinics, ay care centers and similar uses in the LBC Zone, Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - Mayor Greavu; Councilmembers Bastian, Maida and Wasi Nays - Councilmember Anderson. 4. MN DOT Storage Yard - Highway 36 a. Manager Evans stated the local office of the Minnesota Department of Transpor- tation (MnDOT) informed him that they are considering moving the materials off their site on Highway 36. The site is used as a storage area for construction materials. They will consider comments from the City. 19 - 4/23 b. Councilmember Bastian moved to authorize staff to send a letter to MnDOT, requesting that the materials on -their site on Highway 36 be removed on the asis that ese materials are an eyesore from Kighway 36 an are not compatible wit e residential neighborhood to the 1 or commercia i aevelopment on Highway Seconded by Councilmember Ma i da . Ayes - all, c. Councilmember Bastian moved that a letter be forwarded to MnDOT requesting they. donate this land for park purposes. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 5 District Bike Rodeo a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to approve the request' to use the municipal parking lot across the street, north of i ty Hall to hold the District Bike Rodeo on May 5 1984 from AX. unto . Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 6. Lend Lease - Intoxilyzer 5000 a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 -4 -60 BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota Department of P u b l i c Safety, for the f o l l o w i n g purpose: To receive from the State of Minnesota, Department of Public _ Safety, an Intoxilyzer 5000 Breath Test Instrument and Breath Alcohol Simulator on a loan basis. The instruments are to be used by 1 aw enforcement officers to assist them in the detection of motorists who may-be in violation of Minnesota Statutes Section 169.121, or other Minnesota laws or local ordinances or other law enforcement purposes. BE IT RESOLVED that the City Manager and Chief of Police be and they hereby are authorized to execute such agreement. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all 7. Addition to Canine Unit. a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to accept the donation of the Bloodhound and to add the do.g to the City's Canine. Unit and that the necessary cos s, raining an upkeep be approved, 20 - 4/23 Seconded by Counc i lmember Ma i da . Ayes - all. J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Letter to Marilyn Galbraith a. Councilmember Anderson roved to send a letter to Marilyn Galbraith thanking Seconded by Counc i lmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 2,. Beare Avenue a. Mayor Greavu questioned if Beam Avenue west of Highway 61 is a private road and if the City plowed snow there. b.. City Attorney Kelly stated that the City has provided this service for many years and since i t is used by the p u b l i c the City should continue plowing the snow. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS None. M . ADJOURNMENT 9:30 P.M. City Clerk 21 - 4/23 MANUAL , --CHECKS , APRlL,-,4--l--9--8:14-- :f e.x P,73'YJ'•iIIM";"''i'bACLsT. '' - 'JL6A ii:.i'.'¢y,'atli ilC:iYK,' .r s ..L::*'ia•- .,`+,'''f+L e ........,.- . r- -.. — - -. 1984 C*TY OF PAPLEWOCO CHECK RESISTER CHECK NO*AMOUNT VENDORDATEV:.I T &E M 0 rho S C R I P T 1 102113 04/27/84 WOO COMM OF TRANSP 800 KS 3 1 50*00.* IDZC40 04f27184 88050 CLERK OF DISTR COURT CNTY DRIVERS Ll' 88 *50 102M69 04/27/84 191000 MN STATE TREASURER ORTVERS LIC P911A. e 102M69 04/27/84 3,815.75 FN STATE TREASURER MCTOR VE" LTC 1312"69 04f27f84 6932505 MN STATE TREASURER MOTOR VET L C 102M69 04/27184 187000 MN STATE DRIVERSDRIWRS LIC PBL 109518*90 i 7 102027 04/27/84 10000 OFFICE OF STATE AUD TRAVEL TRAINING 10000 102885 04f27/84 317*72 RUSTY SCUDDER RESTR PROGRAMS 317.72 Fal; 103112 04/27/84 120*00 BEHAN JANE REF UNO 120*00 104115 04f27/84 54*0.0 lCMA BOOKS 54.DD Yz 401 104K20 04/27/84 145900 KAWE ROSEMARY PfR DEDUCT 145.00 t4r 104"69 04/27/84 31200 MINN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC P8L 104M69 041`271`94 49035*73 MINN S TREASURER MOTCR VEM LIC P 4047.73 104S42 04/27184 93000 SCIENCE MUSEUM PROGRAMS 52 93*00 54 nn 3 rc,104U180 04127/84 383o60 UNITED WAY P/R 0"EDUCT WA 7 -77 t.1 .1.,. j:f ti X . :i`. '/ Ia- -Yt • row:FY'i 4,r: y'{Y _ K fit. -., a • •. ' •. yyL V - '•' Y. ..: '..:'. ..V '4. i , 'l n'. S.Y ; '.r.. 4.228.00 f F 1984 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK N0.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRZPTIO' 383.60 1OT 04/27/84 81000 MAPLE -LEA= OFFICIALS PROGRAMS 81.00 107M69 04/27/34 381 .00 MINN STATE TREAS DRIVE SIC PQL 107M69 04/27/84 3010499 MINN STATE TREAS MOTOR VEH LTC P 3391.99 138114 04/27/84 303.24 FRANCA MAIN RESTR PROGRAMS 303.24 IlDSM20 04/27/84 -8075.00 METRO WASTE CONTROL SAC PBL 108M20 04/27/80.75-MlrTRO WASTE CONTROL SA: 06L 7 108M69 04/27/84 283,00 MN ST TREASURER DRIWERS LIC FBL 108M69 04/27/94 5 MINN STATE TREAS MOTOR VEH LIC P 5.663.85 • 108M71 04/27/84 620.45 rN ST PREAS SURT SURTAX PBL 108 7'04/27/84 12941-MA ST TiREA.S SURTAX SURTAX PBL 609.04 10SM76 04/27/84 610687924 MN ST TIREAS PERA -P='RA PBL 108!7b 04/27/84 9 *646.19 MN ST rREAS PERA PERA PBL 16333.43 + 109115 _04/27184 - _10' *00 -STATE OF THE REGI O TRAVEL TRAINING 10.00 109116 04/27/84 40.1 0 MYSTERY CAVES PROGRAMS 40.10 109M69 04/27/84 3,915.00 MINN ST TREASURER MOTOR VEH L.1C P 139M69 04/27/84 313.00 PTNN ST TREASURER ORI VERS LIC r-BL 4.228.00 t 1984 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CN£CK REGISTER C NC. DATE AMOUAT VENDCR = ITEM DESCRIPT 110118 J4127184 127.38 GLADSTONE MOUSE PROGRAM 127.38 110AE5 04/27/84 4.87 AURELIUS LUCILLE SUPPLIES 11OA85 04/27/84 4000 AURELIUS LUCILLE SUPPLIES 11DA85 04/27/84 4.25 AURELIUS LUCILLE TRAVEL TRAIN - 110A85 04/27/34 -6.70 AURELIUS LUCILLE.OFF IC:. SUPPLI 110A85 04/27/84 8.49 AURELIUS LUCILLE SUPPLIES 110A85 04/27/84 10.25 AURELT US LUCILLE TRA VEL TRAIN_ 11OA85 04127/84 1.75 AURELIUS LUCILLE SUPPL +ES 110A85 04/27/84 4000 AURELIUS LUCILLE SUPPLIES 110A85 04/27/84 2019 AURELIUS LUCILLE SUPPLIES 110A85 04/27/84 3.08 AURELIUS LUCILLE SUPPLIES 49.58 f 11 OC40 04/27/84 95950 CLERK OF COUNT CNTY DRI VERS 11 OC 40 04/27/84 95.50 CLERK OF COURT CNTY DRI VERS ; 110040 04/27/84 95.50-CLERK OF COURT CNTY DRi VERS i 95.50 11OM69 04/27/84 230.00 MINN STATE TREAS DRIVERS LIC Pt 11CM69 04/27/84 39059.30 NINN STATE TREAS MOTOR VEH LIC 3,289.30 11 1 M69 04/27/84 394 00 .P R STATE TREA S ORT VERS LTC Pf 11IM69 04/27/84 4 MINN STATE TREAS MOTOR VEH LTC 59067.34 1141 1 l 04/27/84 245 WEBER AL REF UND 245.00 114A05 04/27/84 47.88•AFSC "E UK?ON DUES PQ?l 114AO5 04/27/84 -332.00 AFSCM UNION DUES PBL 114AO5 04/27/84 53.20 AFSCME UNION DUES pPL 337.32 114C35 04/27/84 -. - -_-13.988.50 CITY CNTY CR UNION CREDIT UN PBL 13 9988.50 r f 3 I.f a rs r f3 1984 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER N0 -.DATE - -- - - _AMOUNT _VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 114715 0412?'/84 2 , #038.71 ICVA DEFERRED CO 114I 1 5 04/27/ 84 524.20 IC MA DEFERRED COMP 2 114"35 04127/84 12.00 MINN BENEFIT ASSN P/R DEDUCT 114M35 04/27/$4 301.75 PINK , BENEFIT ASSN P/R DEDUCT 313.75 114M52 04/27/84 15 MINN FED SAVINGS FWT PBL 159044o68 f *flr 114M61 04/27184 410,30 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS P/R DEDUCT 410.00 t II 4M 65 04/27/84 8 MN ST COMM/REVENUE SWT FBL 89966.69 1 114M68 04127/84 300.00 MN ST RETIREMENT DEFERRED CQMp 300.00 114M69 04/27/84 25.00 MN ST RETIREMENT DrFRRED COMP 114M69 04/27/84 331 •OD MINN STATE TREAS DRIVERS LTC P9L 114M69 04/27784 - --5 ,MINN STATE TREAS MOTOR VEH LIC PE 1141 04/27184 303.00 P!N% STATE TREASURER - ONR LIC PBL 6.058.68 a 114M70 04/27/34 4 MN STATE TREAS S/S S/S PBL 114M7U 04/27/84 4.296.40 MN STATE TREAS S/S S/S PBL 89408.64 114PI O 04/27/84 41 RAPS-- CNTY COUPT APB RUNS 41.0 tf 114W25 04/27/84 177.40 WISC DEPT REVENUE SWT PBL 177.40 BENEFIT TRUST DENTAL INS PBL 369.00 1984 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CH£C_K REGISTER CHECK N09 DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRI'TI' 1 ,0000000 115M69 04/27/84 430000 M STATE TREAS DRIVERS LIC P61 115069 04/27/94 3 Ph STATE TREAS MCTCtR WE" LIC s 4 , 116M45 04/27/84 10000 METRO AREA MGM ASSN TRAVEL TRArNTK 10.00 tiff 116!,69 04/27/84 69142.20 FINN STATE TREAS MCTCR VEH LIC f 116069 04/27/84 201 030 MINN STATE TREAS DRIVERS LIC pRl 6 9 343.20 117040 04/27/84 94.00 CLERK OF COURT CKTY DRIVERS L' 94.00 tit :f 117M69 04/27!84 4 *910.05 MTNN STATE TREAS MOTOR VEH LIC 1 117M69 04/27/84 158.00 MINN STATE TREAS DRI VtRS LTC F9, 1 59068.05 t 118C41 05/01/84 1 .25 _CHLEBEGK JUDY TRA VE` TRAI RI%lf 11SC47 05/01/84 50 CHLE8ECK JUDY OFFICE SUPPLIE: 118C47 05/01/84 1, 75 CHLEBE0K JUDY TRAVEL TRAINI Nk 11 SC47 05/01184 10.44 ChLEBECK JUDY OFFICE SUPPLIE% 13.94 IISM69 05/01/64 MAO MTNN STATW TREASURER DNR LIC POL 118!69 05/01/84 34200 MINN STATE TREASURER DRIVERSL LTC P8l 118M69 05/C1/84 5004084 MINN STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC 118M69 05/01/84 89397,22 MINN STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC F 14 121 M10 - "05/01184 37540 M. F.O.A'.CERTIFICATE COt, 375.00 121M69 -05/01!84 -369.00 MINN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC PBL 369.00 Q C i I p CHECK REGISTERi.. 1984 CITY OF MA LEWOOD CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR = ITEM DESCRIPTal0' 137.255.48 FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL 14 9466.79 FUND 92 TOTAL PAYROLL BEN: FIT 111000000 FUNI 94 TOTAL DENTAL SELF - I NSi 152.722.27 TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAYABLE MA 1491984 PA CHECK REGISTER L..i_1984 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ITEM DESCRIPTIONi 4 AoutT VENDOR CHECK Na.DATE _.__. - 25.D0 N4TL RIFL= ASSN MEMBERSHIP 135066 05/03f84 25-40 - - -- 67 3 VAN 0 LITE SUPPLIES 135074 D5/O4f84 on- 67.03 5f! . 00 1 BUSINESS MACH OFFICE SU OFFICE SUPPLIES 1351 19 1351 19 051C4 f -- - 05/04/84 SO.aO p - BUSINESS MACH A -1 BUSINESS MACH CONTRACT PYM 1351 19 0 S/03/84 48.00 48.0.0. __p -i BUSINESS MACH CONTRACT FYM _ CO'TRACT PYM 1331 19 _ 13511 fly/ t3 /8.±--- _._-- .__-------- 05/03/84 96.pD A -1 BUS I MACH A - BUSINESS MACH CO PYM 3.135119 fl5 /03/ 8 4 n1440 48.Ufl A -1 SUS TN - S g MACH CONTRACT PYM _ CONTRACT GYM 1351 19 135119 135/03/84. 05/03!84 144.00 A-1 BUSINESS MACH p -1 BUSINESS MACi CONTRACT PYM 1351 19 OS /G3/ 84 q b • 0© 48.00- - -__A -1 BUS !NESS MACH CONTRACT PYM _ CONTRACT PYM 13 51 19 _ - 135119 0 5- / 0.3 / 8 - - -- 05/ ,03/84 r_ 4800 A -1 BUSINESS MACH A - BUSINESS MACH CONTRACT PYM 35119 05/03/84 Tb JO 896.00 75 *30 APPLIED RESEARCH INC SUPPLIESSUPPLIE135120C5/'04/84 7b.30 AALIED RESEARCH INC. 13 51.20_fl / 03 / 84 -- -151o60 17.00 BOSSARD YVONNE REFUND _ 1351 21 05/04/8+ - -_..17.00 t 135 oOO...BROWN MAR.VIN _..TAXIDERMY 135122._ - -- - 05/04/84.__— _13540 15.00 CALLAHAN CATHY RE UN 1351 23 ._05/04/84 _15.00 n COLS ON.- A LB IN . _ _._ _REF UND 1351.2 _C5 /04/84--- -2040 450.00 CORPORATE RISK MANG CONTRACT PYM 135125.--------U5 /04/84 _ - --450.00 SKALMAN FIREARMS SUPPLIES -- 41.7 0 35.0 6 voson MAP CO - -SUPPLIES 135127 0 5 / 0 4 / 84 - - --3 5.0 6 y,EIL N —REFUND _ 1351 28.DSio484 2240 KROP LNI CK I M ILDRED REFUND 135129 05104/84 20.00 L ALLIER 13A SUPPLIES -- 13513.Q------051 1984 CTTY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK Nn.DATE _AMOUNT——VENDOR _ITEM DESCRIPTION z 6.64 135131 05/34/84 975 LANGER TR =E SERV TRLE REMOVAL 975.00 135132 05/04/84 -82.5D ACOD MATERIALS 82.50 + 135134 35/04/8 95.24 ANDERSON CONS TR REFUND 95.24 *3 135135 05/04/84 6.69 MILLERS FtMILY MEAT SUPPLIES 6.69 f 135136 05/04/84 10.00 MN HJMANE SOCIETY BOOKS 1D.00 135137 - - -- 6 35/04/84_ - -_ -MORITZ PETER -- - - -- - --REFUND 10000 135138 05/04/R4 300 NORTH ST DAUL WELONG SUPPLIES VEN 3.10 414.00 NORTHRUP. KING CO SUPPLIES VEH 414.00 135140 05f04/84 12.00 NS P DESIGN MAPS 12.00 135141 05/04/84 1500 POLICE' MARKSMAN ASSN MEMBERSHIP 15o00 t 135142 05/04/84 300 *00 FAOANZ STEPHEN TRAVEL. TRAINING 39040 RMSY EMERG SERV_BOOKLETS 142.0 0 135144 "05/04/84 3000 RYDEN BEE RENTAL 30.00 * 135145_ —___736.20 SUBURBAN RATE. RUTH -..-SUBSCRTPTION 736.2Q 135AO2 05/03184 6.27 ACRO•MINN SUPPLIES 6 .2 7 t 135A69__ --3510318.4 175.95 'ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR MATNT VET 135A69 05/03/84 21975 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR MAINT VET- cl t--1984 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER C"ECK _ hC.D _ - - - . - - - --AMOUIT- - - - -_.VENOOK ITEM DESCRIPTION f• • 135A69 05 /03184 366.10 ARNALS AUTO SER V REPAIR MAINT WEN 135A69 05/ - - - -107 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR MAINT WE 135A69 05/03/84 219.40 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR MAINT WE 135A69 05/03/84 34.QU ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR MAINT WE 135A69 05/03/84 161.15 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR MAINT WE 135A69 05/03184 21e75 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR MAINT WE 135A69 05/03/84 30.15 ARNAL S AUTO SERV REPAIR MAINT WE 135A69 03/14 -21 .? 5 ARNALS -AUTO SERV _ - - - -- __ REPAIR MAINT VE 135A69 0.5 05/U3/84 21.75 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR MAINT WE 135A69 05/03/84 33.40 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR MAINT V 135A69 21 30 ARNALS AUTO SER V REPAIR MAINT WE 135A69 05 15.00 ARNALS AUT SERV REP MAINT YE 135A69 OS/03/g4 37.75 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR MAINT WE 135A69 05/0.3/84 _234o65 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR MAINT WE 135 05/03/84 55:00 ARNALS AUTO SERV • REP AIR•MAINT WEN 135A69 05/U3/84 27.75 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR POINT VE 135A69 05/03/84 277.55 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR MAINT VEH 135A69 05/031$4 164.85 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR MAINT WEN k 135A69 05/03184 66.85 ARNALS AUTO SERV RcPAIR MAINT VET! 26 . 90 -ARfkALS AUTO SERV - RFPATP. MAINT VEH 135A69 05 /03/84 260.70 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR MAINT YEN 5A 7 5 3 5/ C 3/ 8.4 -- - -- -2 0, 4 5 --AT S.TELEPHON 13 - -- - 135A75 05/03/84 5.00 AT S T TELEPHONE 135A75 05/03/84 66.18 AT b T TELEPHONE M- - 13 5 A T S 1.A T a T TELEPHONELEPt 01 E 135A75 05/03/84 2.50 AT b T TELEPHONE T t 135A TS DS /03/84 7.50 AT L T TELEPHONE r 135A75 0 - - --AT A-----TELEPHONE 13SA75 DS QS /03/'84 5.00 AT b T TELEPHONE 13505 05/03/84 69.23 AT 8 T TELEPHONE 135A T5 05/03/84 1 40.1 1 .AT b T TELEPHONE. 135A75 05/C3/84 74.25 AT a. T TELEPHONE 135A75 05/C3/84 8.55 AT a T TELEPHONE 135A75 03184 -2" SD 7.50 AT b T TELEPHONE 135A75 Q5 - - -- CS /03 %Sy AT L T TELEPHONE 135A75 CS/C3/84 500 AT 9 T TELEPHONE y -135A75 Q5/Q3/84 30.6L AT b T TELEPHONE 135A75 05/03/84 191o54 AT a T TELEPHONE 135A75 05/03/84 21.60 AT a T TELEPHONE 135A75 fl5/03/8A 2 50 15000 AT 9 T_-TELEPHONE 135A75 05/03/84 AT 6 T TELEPHONE 135A75 05/03/84 25.45 AT a T TELEPHONE 135A75 05/G3/84 2.50 AT . 8 T TELEPHONE 135A75 05/03/84 31990 AT 9 T TELEPHONE 135A75 05/03/84 5.00 AT A T TELEPHONE 135A 75 D5 /03/8 -b 2.50 AT i T - _..._TELEPHONE 135A75 05/2.50 AT a T TELEPHONE 13SA 75 05 /03/84 2.50 AT a T TELEPHONE s...135A75 05103184 4.50 AT.. L . T_.TELEPHONE 135A75 05103/84 2950 AT a T TELEPHONE 135A75 05/03/84 6.50 AT 9 T TELEPHONE 3: yt..yt"v..'YC <.! _ tS' ... •.. 9.i -. ti-t: •'z, -1r_" .Y- .h i't r "• .. ,t Y YLl "vs y ,. y.t "' .?t• .1 ti•, C. L• ' -. {. '.• a '. L .. _ _ .. • 'T` .. s.'' .S,wti..i -: K'it. :;..'_. 4;t` ,., :l) ) -. +' . ?r,:f' :t rr. -• `'f. Y nxYt fs }.! :" friifi.''W`^1d. v _, ), . ccr"d. +o-''•s,y " . ti' r ,? 7 i s*t t15 a':t ¢r!.:' ln' _ :p s r'. _f _ r,.jr'ti ') trs.,t.d: . 4Z ..s:. 'Y •.. : > wit. O ,r -..r - s• 7r ,... L.r .. ', v , ,:.. .,... i.' 'w "'...r _ ..... - ) • . - • .G. ._. r, ..:: ... i < . s . ' . • 1'.. :.'` ' ' L d :. ,,f ) w .: '+ '.t •. ... `f ';.. ., .s. is _...- ..- .: .. . ... .. ..., .:. 1 .. -..Ll.. .r. ._ _ {. ) ..'. .J". r 1. . .. < a ... - ... ... : _ .''"',r, .. ;,. ...., .) {:..;•. ,,. . ,.,... ._ ......, 1 }. '1. ._ r :,}, . I 1 p tt!! ..YZ. -` • `L' I vt% J :• • i ~ 'N i 3t _IWI W . Y t• k . :tl 'I / T ,. 'l ! . °. .- :.'... .; KM: '. rtYn•. a •'ti ;• t"p a w ,s ;.j 1', z- gr, •+aS?X"k!$NxeeM,';.'r•., }. - e p .. „q:,e ae.Yia v.b.y^' ' ..'1... :wl .. Y .. -:.. '... r._.'.ft •- -r•: ji ?^'/m, '.,a .• ::.. -•' : +/...N.: r• C:•. ' ... '• Y:r.i.. .. . _ 7:- .. i.' 'il. 'fdC 1'.': L _... - . _ , , l .. .;.;'l._.G -Y :-. ' -. Cie H- r - 1984 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK NC..DATE _- _..._ -. _AMOUNT. _VENDOR _ITEM DESCRIP TIC 135K25 -05/03/84 -- - -- -65.36...KARIS FLINT TRAVEL TRAININC 135K25 L5/0184 85936 KARIS FLINT SUPPLIES f 135K25 05/03/84 85.36-CAR=S FLINT SUPPLIES 65.3 6 135x55 05103/84 95.88 KNOX LUMBER SUPPLIES 135K55 05/03/84 68.56 KNOX LUMBER SUPPLIES 135K55 035/03/84 86.94 KNOX LUMBER SUPPLIES 251 .38 • 135L16 05/03/84 4 ,373.93 LAIS BXNNIGAN KLY CONTRACT PYM 135L16 05/03f84 1 *428.75 LAIS BANNTGAN KLY CCNTRACT FYx 135L16 05103/84 67.50 LAIS BANNIGAN KLY CONTRACT PYM 5 9870 90 8 13509 05/03/84 42.00 LAKE SKNTTATTON RUBBISH R_M0VAI 135L19 05/03/84 127,50 LAKE SANITATION RUBBISH REMOVAL 169.50 t 135L27 05/03f84 149.42 LANGULA MDW SUPPLIES 149.42 1351 28 - -- -- --35.00 RICHARD.. _CANINE AL LOWANC 35.00 1350C 05/03/84 1 ,782.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES Membership11p782 *DO..-*.- -- 135MII 05/04/84 99.95 -MAC QUEEN EQUIPFENT SUPPLIES 135M11 OS /03184 97.24 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 197.19 135M14 05103/84 67.55 MAPLEWOOD REVIEW PUBLISHING 135M14 ID5/03/84 14.00 MAPLEWOOD REVIEW SUBSCRIPTION Ela 5 -5 -'` - - - -- 135M46 05/03/34 35.00 METTLER DANIEL CANINE ALLOWANC 35.00 i IP-A 1984 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER f. CHECK NO.. DATE _ AMOUNT - VENDOR = ITEM DESCRIPTION f 135M79 05103/84 70305 MN UC FUND UNErfl BENEFI T 703.05 135M90 05103/84 285.00 MOTOROLA INC SUPPLIES 2 85.00 05103/84 -24.32 .._.. _.NADEAU EDWARD TRAVEL TRAINING 24.32 135N20 G5 /C3 /84 56.39 NEE-Dr-LS CO SUPPLIES 05/03f$14 - -- -- - -270c.o -.--------NEEDELS. CO SUPPLIES135P420 83.3 9 1351Y30 05 /03 /R 4 53.10 NIRTR ST PAUL CITY UTILITIES 1.35N30 U5/03/84 -. - - - - -.1 ,v309.60 -- - --WORTH ST-PAUL CITY UTILITIES X362.70 135N50 05/03/84 926.32-NORTHWESTERN BELL TELE J --135145 0 - - - - --05/03f84 45.49 - - - - - --11 CRTHWESTER N BELL TELEPHONE 135N50 05/03!84 49.80 NORTHWE!ST:RN BELL TELEPHONE 135 05/03/84 33 *97 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 135N50 05/03/84 1006.58 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 135N50 05/03/84 17.90 AORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 135N50 05/03/84 4.67 NOR 4WESTcRN BELL TELEPHONE 05/03/84. -- -67 .3.3 --NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 135N50 05/03/84 34 *17 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 135N50 05/03/84 46 N0RT4W LIST ERN BELL TELEPHONE 135N50 05/03/84 69.89 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 135N50'05103184 49 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 135N5 C 05/03/84 38990 1 CRTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 135N 5 0 05103 /84__._.------NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHGNE 135N5Q _05/03/84 15.58 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 135N50 05/C3/84 27.69 N rPTHWEST ER N BELL TELEPHONE 135N50 05/03/84 16.43 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 135N50 05/03/84 1 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 135N50 U5/03/84 153917 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 135N50.----05/03./18 -4 38.07.. __.N ?RTHWESTERN -BELL .._TELEPHONE M 135N50 05/03f34 185.70 NORT4WEST ER N BELL TELEPHONE 135N50 05103/84 67.NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 135N50 05/03/84 . - -- -__49.80 _ _._NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 135N50 05/03/84 3807 NORTHWESTERN HELL TELEPHONE. t5 135N50 D5/03/84 47.30 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 1984 CITY OF MAPLE WO CD CHECK REGISTER Is CHECK NUJ.DATE _.A VENDO UTI LITI 135N5C 05/03/84 49.80 NORTHWESTERN BELL 135 0 - - - - --9 • 0 _._NORT4WEST ERN BELL _ . 135N50 05/03/84 13 .12 NORTHWESTERN BELL 135N50 05/U3/84 49.80 NORTHWESTERN BELL 135N50-05/03/84 10503 N CRTHWESTERN BELL 135N50 05103/84 119090 NORTHWESTERN BELL 135N50 U5/03/84 84.44 NORTHWESTERN BELL 135N50- -fly/ 3!84 - - --38.07 - - - - --NORTHWESTERN BFLL 135N50 05/03184 38.07 NORTHWESTERN BELL 135N50 05/C3/84 17 NORTHWESTERN BELL 135N50 05/U3/84 12.02 NOaTHWEST;.RN BELL 135N50 05/03/84 38.07 ACRTHWESTERN BELL 135N50 05/03/84 37.77 NORTHWESTERN BELL 135N80 1 UTILITIES ITEM DESCRIPTION, TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 135N80 - -05 /03/84 781 .98 N.S.P.UTI LITI 135N80 05/03/84 247.83 N.S. °.UTILITIES 135t 05/0/84 9.0 9 - - - - -- - -S. P • _. __UTILITIES 135N80 05/03/84 2.40 N.S.P.UTILITIES 135N80 05/03/84 2.40 N.S.P.UTILITIES 135N80 05/C3/84 2.40 N.S.P.UTILITIES 135N80 05/03/84 2.40 N.S.P.-UTILITIES 135N80 05/03/84 2940 N. S.P •UTILITIES 135N80 05/03/84-3. _N.S.o.UTI Li TIES 135NEO 05/01, 4 2.40 A. sop UTILITIES 135N80 05/03/84 260.55 N.S.P.UTILITIES 135N80 05/03f 795 N. SOP UTI LITIES 13580 CS /D3 /8 _106.11 A.S.p UTILITIES 135N80 05/03/84 73.50 N.S.P.UTI lI TIES 135N80 0 3 /Ry..134 N.S.P. - _UTILITIES 135NRO Q5_ 051U3/84 74.37 N.S.P.UTILITIES 135N 80 OS /r3 /84 77.151 N• S.p.UTILIT 13SN80 J5/03/84 119.66 -N.S.P.UTILI TIES 135%!80 05/03/105.84 N.S.o.UTILITIES 135N80 05 /C3 /84 126968 11. SOP UTILITIES 135N80 05103/84 73 . 97 ------- .....__N. S.P • -- - __ -UTILITIES 135'V80 OS /03/84 35.93 N.S.P.UTILITIES 135NSO 05/03/84 5 *!55 So**UTILITIES 135N80 05/03/84 98950 A.S.P.UTILITIES 135N80 05/03/84 7907 N.S.p.UTILITIES 135NB0 05/03/84 35.50 N.S.P.UTILITIES 73.18 N. S. • ----- - - - - -- - -UTILITIES 135N80 05/93/84 6.01 N.S.P.UTILITIES 135N80 05/03/84 37.51 N.S.P.UTILITIES 135N80 05/03184_6.01 --N.S.P.UTILITIES 135NPC C5/C3/84 20.44 P.S.P.UTILITIES 135NBO 05/03/84 126.58 N.S.P.UTILITIES 135N80 05./03f 25 ._.__..S ot' o UTILITIES 135N80 05/03/844.25 Ik *SOP .UTIL *TIES 135N80 05/0/84 56.18 N. S.P.UTILITIES 135N80 05/03/84 2 N.S.P.UTILITIES 135N80 05/U3/84 8.57 N.S.P.UTILITI 135N80 05/03/84 13.42 N.S.P.UTILITIES fft* 135N95 05/U3/84 6.00 NUTESON LAVERNE 135N95 05/033/84 15.00 NUTESON LAVERNE 2100 f- - - 135025 135025 135025 135025 135025 O5/03/R4 05 /C3 /R 4 05/03f84 05/03/94 05/03f84 TRAVEL TR4INING TRAVEL TtRAINING 50.60 CFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 55*06 OFFICE PRODUCTS 1984 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD OFFICE CHECK REGISTER 29576900 CFFICE PRODUCTS EQUIPlPEAT 1 X900.00 OFFICE CNE'CK NC.DATE - __ -- _ _- _APOUWT _ - -- _._._._...VENDCR -ITEM DESCRTPTIC 135N80 05/03/84 15.01 N.S.P.UTILITIES 135N80..- --5/G3/84 -- - - -56.18- ,___..N.S.P.- -- - -- - --UTILITIES 135N80 05/03/84 4.25 A.S.P.UTILITIES 135N80 05/03/84 56.1 8 N. S.P.UTILITIES 135N80 D5/03/84 90.72 N.S.P.UTILITIES 135N80 05/03/84 2142 N.S.P.UTILITIES 135N80 05/03/84 22.87 N.S.P.UTILITIES 135N8Q.__ .05/03/.84.._. _ - -2 bR.13 N•S.P• _..UTILITIES 135N80 051.03/84 229.76 N.S.P.UTILITIES 135N 80 05 /O3/84 38106 S.P.UTILITIES 135N80 05/03/84 53.97 N*S.p.UTILITIES 135N80 05/03/84 197.73 N.S.P.UTILITIES 135NBC 05/0/84 167.51 11o, SOP UTILITIES 135N80 - -05 /03/8 4 -90.48 -. _N. Soo .UTILITIES 135N80 05/03/84 13.20 N.S.P•UTILITIES 135N80 05/03/84 65.90 N.S.F.UTILITIES 135N80 05/03/84 195.92 11. sop .UTILITIES 135N80 05/03/84 277.713 N.S.P.UTILITIES 135N80 D5 /03/84 16.33 N.S.P.UTILITIES 135NS0 --- - - -05/03/$4 - -- _ - - --1.79.135 -- - - -ik._E.P. - -_ _ _ - - -_UTI LITIES 135NBO 05/03/84 82.36 N.S.P.UTILITIES 135N80 05/03/84 172.68 N.S.P.UTILITIES 135N80 05/U3/84 8019 N.S.P.UTILITIES 11 * 984.14 t fft* 135N95 05/U3/84 6.00 NUTESON LAVERNE 135N95 05/033/84 15.00 NUTESON LAVERNE 2100 f- - - 135025 135025 135025 135025 135025 O5/03/R4 05 /C3 /R 4 05/03f84 05/03/94 05/03f84 TRAVEL TR4INING TRAVEL TtRAINING 50.60 CFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 55*06 OFFICE PRODUCTS CFFICE SUPPLIrc 55900 OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 29576900 CFFICE PRODUCTS EQUIPlPEAT 1 X900.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS EQUIPMENT 4036.60 * 135040 05/04/84 291.94 CLO DOMINION BRUSH SUPPLIES 29.1 . 135P30 05/03/84 88020 PETERSON BELL CONV CONTRACT PYM 88.20 + 135P45 05/03/34 318000 - I:TTNEY BOWES SUPPLIES 135P45 05/03/84 74900 PITNEY 83WES CONTRACT PYM 3 92.0 0 r 135SO2 05/03/84 r/ 1984 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 05/04/84 CHECK- REGISTER CHECK NO.*.. s DATE - - - -- - -- _AMOUNT - - -- - -- - _VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 2.3_.3 7 - -* - - - - - -- 135P64 05/04/84 15.00 PRETTNER JOSEPH TRAVEL TRAINING 135P50 15.00 72.94 RONS cl SUPPLIES 135SO5 72.94 # 135RO3 05/04/84 94.00 R.L.POLK CO DIRECTCR Y 135RO3 05/03/84 47.00 R=L•POLK CO BOOK 135RO3 OS /Oz/84 4 7.00 R. L.pOLK CO BOOK 135502 05/03/84 188.00 S 9 D LOCK 9 SAFE SUPPLIES 135SO2 99o. 9S - - - -- -R A CI 0 SHACK SUPPLIES _. LOCK 9 SAFE SUPPLIES 99.95 135SO5 C5/C3/84 11.76 S 9 T OFFICE OFFICE" 135R27 05/04/84 62.73 REFOS SALES SERVICE SUPPLIES 135R.27 - - --05/04.!.8$ - - - - --9.90 REEDS SAL =S ESSERVICESUPPLI 72.63 * 1 135SO2 05/03/84 S - 135R48 05/04/84 23.37 ROAD MACHINERT SUPPLIES 2.3_.3 7 - -* - - - - - -- 135P50 05 /03/84 72.94 RONS PRINTING SUPPLIES 135SO5 72.94 # 21.92 S T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 135505 - - 135SO2 05/x3/84 - _5.25 __S S 0 LOCK 4 SAFE SUPPLIES 135502 05/03/84 6.00 S 9 D LOCK 9 SAFE SUPPLIES 135SO2 05/03/84 2.60 S 9 D LOCK 9 SAFE SUPPLIES 1 135SO2 05/03/84 S -s D LOCK 5 SAFE - --SUPPLIES s 22.25 • 135SO5 05/03/84 21.92 S T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 135505 - -05 /03/8 -4-33.02 - -- _S 8 T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 135505 05/C3/84 38000 S 9 T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 135SO5 C5/C3/84 11.76 S 9 T OFFICE OFFICE"SUPPLIES yf`=135S05 05!03/84 11.85 S 9 T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 135SO5 05/03/84 59.64 -S 9 T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 135SO5 05/03/84 4.80-S 6 T OFF -ICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 135505._---- -05/03_f 84 -_ __"- -_20.69 - _ _S It T OFFICE OAF ICE SUPPLIES 135505 05/03/84 39.67 S 9 T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 135505 05/C3/84 11.40 S 9 T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 135SO5 05/03/84 1 S b T OFF ICE OFF ICE SUPPLIES 1 135SO5 05/C3/84 4.l 6 S 9 T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 05/03/84 37.39 S 6 T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES135S05 4 J_TT t. 135S33 05/04184 93.93 SELECT SERVICE SUPPLIES CHECK REGISTER 93.93 + 1484 CITY i OF MAPLE'WOOD CHECK N09 DATE - - - -- --- - - - - --AMOUNT - - - - - -- - --VENDOR - --ITEM DESCRIPTION 135S58 135SO5 05/03/84 64.82 S 9 T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 135SO5 - --05/03/84. - -- _ -4.Q0 —_S T OFFICE - -.OFFICE SUPPLIES 135S05 05/03/84 59.64 S 8 T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 135SO5 C5/03/84 2063 S T OFFICE OFF ICE SUPPLIES 135SO5 05/03/84 11. R6 S A T OFFICE OFF ICE SUPPL _ES 135SO5 05/03/84 54 *08 S 8 T OFFICE OFF ICE SUPPLIES 135505 05 /C3 /$4 20.69-S T OFFICE OFF ?CE SUPPL ?ES 135S05 -- --05_/03/84 --4.R0 -_. _ _..__S 8 T OFFICE.OFFICE SUPPLIES 425.48 + t. 135S33 05/04184 93.93 SELECT SERVICE SUPPLIES 93.93 + 135558 05/04/84 158.15 ST PAUL CITY OF RADIO MAINT 135S58 05/04x84 28000 ST PAUL CITY OF RADIO MAINT 135S58 - -- -5104/34. -- - --x`53'4 ©__-----------S7 PAUL CITY OF . _RADII MA ZNT 135S58 135/04/84 137.20 ST PAUL. CITY OF REPAIR MAINT 776.75 + tt #tt+ 135S65.------05/ - 4 --50Ofl.0QST PAUL RAPSEY ME 0 _ _.__TRAINING _ 59000.O D 135S68o's 05/04/84 75,00 ST PAUL SUBURBAN BUS TRANSPORTATION 135S68 05/04/84 90000 ST PAUL SUBURBAN BUS TRANSPORTATION _..._ 165.90 135S70 05/04/84 162.00 STANDARD SPG ALIGN REPAIR MAINT VEH 162.0 0 135S83 - --05/04/84 15.00 _._.STATE OF MINN TREAS CERTIFICATTON 15.00 + t" 135S84 05/04/84 35.00 STEFF M\ SCOTT CANIN_ ALLOWANCE 35.0 0 i5 .135S90 _05/04184 26 FUEL 0Il 135S90 05/04/84 10001 SUPERAMERICA FUEL OIL 135S90 05/04/84 15.00 SUPERAMERICA FUEL OIL 135S90 05/04/84 17000 SUPERAMERICA FUEL OIL 135590 05104/84 12.90 SUPERAMERICA FUEL OIL 135S90 05/04/84 32 .00 SUPERA MER TCA FUEL oil. 1079.49 f 135U77 05/04/84 63.50 UNITED BUSINESS MACH SUPPLIES 63.50 4: 1 c 135079 _ - -- - - - - -- 05 /04/ 84 44.G0 _. UNITED STORES SUPPLIES 44.00 135V47 05/04/84 40080 HIKING IND CENTER SUPPLIES 13 1984 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER N0.DATE AMOUNT YE ND03 ITE DESC RIP TIO" 135S90 OS/D4/84 3.99 SUPERAMERICA FUEL OIL 135590 _05/04/8.4 - -46.50 SUPERAMERICA FUEL OIL 135S9C 05/C4/84 15.00 SUPERAMERICA FUEL OIL 135S90 05/04/84 3.39 SUPERAMERICA FUEL OIL 182.38 ft :t *t 135T44 05/C4/84 12000 THINGS RE4EMBERED SUPPLIES 12.00 135T93- _._.__ -_05/04/84__ - -43.75 -TWIN CITY .FILTER FILTERS CLE.AtirD 43.75 135T95 05/D4184 30.44 TWIN CITY MOW SUPPLTES 135T95 05/04/84 71,94 - _TWIN CITY HDW SUPPLIES 135T95 - -05/04/34 53.75 TWIN CITY HOW SUPPL IES 135T95 05/04f84 51,52 7WTN CITY HOW SUPPLIES 207.65 f *f * *t 135V50 U5/G4/84 28.50 --UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 135050 05 /04/84 77.40 U V TFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 135050 05/04/84 80.95.UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 135U50 05/C4/84 34.86 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED MACE 135050 C5/04/84 40.41 UATFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 135050._-----05/04/84 _.__---------4R•10 UNTFDRMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 135U50 05/04/84 117.72 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 135050 05/0`4/84 229.20 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 135U50 05/04/84 74e25 UNTF3 RMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 135050 05/04/84 99500 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 135050 05/04/84 60.30 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 1351U50.05/04/8.4_ - -_-60.30 - .UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 135050 05/04/84 6000 UN!FDRMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS. 135050 D5/04/84 78020 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 1079.49 f 135U77 05/04/84 63.50 UNITED BUSINESS MACH SUPPLIES 63.50 4: 1 c 135079 _ - -- - - - - -- 05 /04/ 84 44.G0 _. UNITED STORES SUPPLIES 44.00 135V47 05/04/84 40080 HIKING IND CENTER SUPPLIES i s 1984 CITY OF MAPLEWOOp CHECK REGISTER CHECK -_ NO.-DATE - - -- ---- __- _ - -A -._._. -_ -__-VENDOR _ _ -ITEM DESCRIPTION 40.80 135V80 5 /a4 /84 67.81 Vii EIMICKE ASSOC SUPPLIES 67.81 13500 05/04/84 584.25 W i WA4t EQUIPMENT 584,.25 135W21 05/04!84 2605 WARNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 135421 05/04/84 28.57 WARNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 135121 05/04/84 12.58 WARNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 135W21 05104/84 59.28 WARNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 135W21 C5/04184 9.96 WARNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 135WZ1 05/04 50 - - -WARNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 135121 05/04/84 5961 WARNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 135W21 05/04/84 16.33 WARNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 135W21 05 /04/84 11.WARNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 135W21 L5 /04 /84 _58.10 WARNER'S TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 135W21 05104/84 36e06 WARNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 270.45 135W50 05/04/84 - -7000 WE'BER•TROSETH INC SUPPLIES 135W50 05/O4/84 3500 WEBER- TROSETH INC SUPPLIES 135N5.0 U5 /04/_84-55.30 iIEBER- TROSETH INC SUPPLIES 16000 * 135W60 05/04/84 96.94 WESCO SUPPLIES 96.94 135W64 05/04/84 316.11 WHITE BEAR DODGE SUPPLIES 316.1 135u65 051C4/84 61.21 WHITE BEAR OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 135W65 05/04f84 32.67 WHITE BEAR OFFICE SUPPLIES 135u65 05/04/84 26.76 4mITE BEAR OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES t _ 120.64 135W70 05104/84 1.760.00 W INFIELD MITCHELL APPRAI SERV 1356170 05/04/84 40.DO WINFIELD MITCHELL APPRAISAL S 1984 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER N0, DATE _ - --AMOUNT. - - - - - --yENDt?R ITEM DESCRIPTION 1 85.41- - - - - --110SOR SUPPLIES 85,41 f 135t10 05/04/84 7.97 ZUERCHER JOHN APPRAISAL SERW 51 OPte62 FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL 984.98 -_ - -FUN* 03 TOTAL HYDRANT CHAR 95.24 FUND 11 TOTAL PARK DEVELOPMENT 374.5 8 FUND 35 TOTAL - - - -- -_83 -1 b MA PL WD PR OFES 3.188.75 FUND 47 TOTAL 78-10 BILLWOOD DR /DO 107.51 FUND 50 TOTAL.78=24 BEAM A Y/ y. F" M _ 12000 FUND 86 TOTAL 83 -4 MCK NIGHT RD FIAT 3*C66.75 FUND 90 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER FUND 703 *05 FUND 92 TOTAL PAYROLL BENEFIT FUND x'788. - _FUND 96 VEHICLE 9 EQUIP MAIN 62 9 260.24 T CTAL 3 f' ti I ,ATE S ITEM F L u-ELT . O L FL E S i I; 15 7' y.- r.....,v.. ._... +... •.'. y 'A!n._... •Y._:M °4f'«. . ,.'\: p :1- .FM.pp • •....: 1 f r• - -:. ..•. ..•^ ,y.- v - - ..,x•a..,,..._....•.• -..s p - .. I (f . 0 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PPAYROLL- CHECKS REGIStER CCYC 88008 CCHECK DATE 005- 04•-84 PERI00 EENDING 04.27` -84 PAGE DDEPT -NO EEMPL -NO EEMPLOYEE VAME CCHECK -NO AAMOUNT CCLEARED z 00002 4484369671 BBEHM LLOtS NN 00430 -00001 4459.00 II ) 4 . 0002 2206242018 EEVANS OOaRRY RR 00430 -M 00002 11#236 1 0002 11 095.420n 0010 44736644 74 JJAHN DDA VTO JJ 00430 -00003 1102.71 tt ii 0010 4473900147 JJOHNSON GGREGORY RR 00430 -00004 00000 tt x 9 - _- _ -__. 00010 446958652.3 _ .... SSWANSQN -JR. LLYLE EE 00430- 00005 4491 • 57 tt 11 _____ -t2 00010 559 4.2 8 * „ 13 0012 3357340166 CCUBE LLARRY JJ 00430 -00006 1175.61 tt )117 0012 4470 5201 24 DDOHERTY KKATHLEEN MM 00430 - 00007 881.74 001.2 _ 4471400908 _.._.__IUERCHER JJOHN LL. 00430 - 00008 1103_04 j t ri' f 21 0012 3361 •29 • 222 e 3 00021 4469501078 FFAUST DDANIEL FF 00430-00009 ii x035.47 tt )2 24 1211 2 1 103 5, 4 7 * . . 27 1 0022 4469200614 HHA GEN AARLI NE JJ 00430 -00010 4484 00022 3390444446 MMATHEYS AALANA KK 00430 - 00011 5543.53 ) 0022 4476704432 MMOELLEl% MMARGARET AA 00430.00012 00000 tt x )333 27, 002 4473327550 VVIGNALO BBELORS AA 00430 -00013 4464.88 tt )33 18 00022 1 •493.03 337 1 0031 4471322198 AAURELIUS LLUCILLE EE 00430 -00014 8845.92 tt )449 i 00031 4474264816 SSELVOG BBETTY 00 00430.00015 5520* 61 tt )443 t 442 1 1 00.31._ _ 11 366, 53 45 00033 4477288389 GGREEN PPHYLLI S CC 0043000016 5577.24 tt )44; 0033 4472244994 HHENSLEY PPATRICIA AA 00430 -00017 1164.23 tt )4EI CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL- CHECKS REGISTER DEPT•NO EMP Lao NO EMPLOYEE NAME r 11= a CYCLE 8008 CHECK DATE 05 -04.84 PERIOD ENDING C4 -27 -84 PAGE 2 CHECK -N4 AMOUNT CLEARED 0042 477481364 ARNOLO DAVID 0042 4 71 4021 15 ATCHISON JIMN I' r 0042 476721577 BANICK JOHN N 043000029 0042 469689867 BOWMAN RICK 0042 468461930 CLAUSON DALE A 0430 -00031 0042 4 76 4461 19 DREGER RICHARD K 0430.00032 0042 470267887 GREEN NORMAN C 0430 -00033 0042 392240565 HAGEN THOMAS L 0430 -00034 0042 469568516 FALWEG KEVIN L 0430 -00035 0042 473604916 HERBERT MICHAEL R 0430 -00036 0042 472222231 KORTUS DONALD i 1.4 0042 471563591 LANG RICHARD 1 '"'0042 _..46818/347 MCNULTY JOHN J 0430 -00039 0042 474607686 MEEHAN•JR JAMES J 0430 -00040 0042 471627417 METTLER DANIEL E 043000(]41 0042 4694423 63 MOESCHTER RICHARD B 0430 -00042 PO42 476340490 MORELLI RAYMOND M 0430 - 00043 0042 4684628 84 PELTIER WILLIAM 2'0042 _..__470520457 SKALMAN _DONALD F 0430 -00045 0042 4 73 54 82 26 STAFNE GREGORY w 0430ftoo046 0042 471721204 STEEPEN SCOTT 0042 4715002 51 STILL VERNON L 0430.00048 0042 471629204 STOCKTON DARRELL f 0042 471602352 THOMALLA DAVID T 0430 -00050 0042 _.. _.4 7 5 3 6 33 3 3 ....--...WILLIAMS D U A N E J 0430 -00051 0042 474260130 ZAPPA JOSEPH 1 _.f S 0042 A 0430 -00053 U043 475 54 8434 BECKER RONALD 13.f 0043 469441789 GRAF DA D 0430 - 00054 0043 4698204 66 HEINZ STEPHEN N 0430- 00055 0043 392760309 KARIS FLINT J 0430 -00056 0043 476401388 LEE ROGEa Q 0430-00057 0043 473567791 MELANDER ION Y 0430 - 00058 0043 463360918 NELSON CAROL t 0 04 3 471504316 RAZSKAZOFF DALE M 0430 -00060 0043 471564801 RYAN MICHAEL E 0430 -00061 0043 4 744863 71 VORWERK ROBERT P 0430 -00662 0043 469502201 YOUNGREN JAMES E 0430 -OOC63 0043 t f 0045 471401878 E MBERTSON JAMES 1.''0045 472242227 SCHADT ALFRED M 0430-00065 0045 Fr. C 0430 -00066 790.33 0046 468401899 CAHANES ANTHONY G 0430 -00067 0046 4776272 36 FLAUGHER JAMEE L 0430 -00068 0046 376709873 MAOELL RAYMCND o 451e9?t 71 A) .VA)7 s, 7 I' 2 L 0430 -00028 522.37 I 1 N 043000029 755.40 J 0430 -40030 493.53 t a 7 A 0430 -00031 586.CC t I U K 0430.00032 54300 t VOID - REPLACEMENT CK #043000155 C 0430 -00033 905.37 L 0430 -00034 6 74.97 L 0430 -00035 508946 t R 0430 -00036 616.92 J 0430 -00037 627o42 t 10 V 0430 -00038 247.72 t 17 J 0430 -00039 5 84.30 1S J 0430 -00040 155.82 E 043000(]41 691.04 t l B 0430 -00042 801.19 t 2. M 0430 - 00043 236.98 J 0430 -00044 577.11 F 0430 -00045 774.62 t w 0430ftoo046 380968 L 0430.00047 732.11 t s L 0430.00048 295.34 c 3t T 0430 -00049 692.44 T 0430 -00050 758.24 t 3. J 0430 -00051 47607 J 0430 -OOO52 526.37 A 0430 -00053 738.50 t 3 3 . 14 9902.87 3 •, D 0430 - 00054 297967 t I4 N 0430- 00055 616.48 t J 0430 -00056 736.10 t I 4s Q 0430-00057 192.79 t I a.. 4' Y 0430 - 00058 703.54 t 1 4 A 0 430 -00 C 59 21.32 t 41 M 0430 -00060 987.22 t E 0430 -00061 775.58 P 0430 -00662 538.68 E 0430 -OOC63 310922 t G 0430-00064 8 70.79 69050.39 5 M 0430-00065 116.50 Fr. C 0430 -00066 790.33 1 ,506.83 + G 0430 -00067 75.22 6 1 L 0430 -00068 462.30 M 0430.00.069 451e9?t 71 7 s, 7 CITY OF MAPLEW000 3AYROLL - CHECKS ZEGIStER CYCLE B008 CHECK DATE 05-04-84 PERIOD ENDING 04-27-84 PAGE 3 i -DEPT -NO EMPL - NO EMPLOYEE NAME CHECK- NC AMOUNT CLEARED 0046 47380 7330 MARTIN SHAWN M 0430 -00070 449.26 0046 472 365919 AELSON KAREN A 0430-00071 380 0046 4686001 83 RABINE JANET L 0430 - 00012 451 •04 t 0046 477700322 STANNKE JULIE A 0430 -00073 417.71 t 0046 2 9687.81 f g 0051 471440267 BARTA MARTE L 0430 241 112 0051 473566872 HA IOER KENNETH G 0430 -00075 2 79.61 t t 0051 5044831 74 YEGYERTH JUDITH A 0430 - 00076 361 0051 882.96 0052 496308314 _C WILLIAM C 0430.00077 672.59 t f4 0052 4 715262 54 FREBER G RONALD L 0430 -00078 3 96.31 t zt 0052 502544/37 HELEY RONALD J 0430 -00079 607,74 t 1: n OC152 471501241 WANE MICHAEL R 0430 -00080 402.16 0052 468363473 KLAUSTNG HENRY F 0430 -00081 492.15 0052 475 6014 31 LUTZ DAVID P 0430 -00082 483.88 t zb z7 0052 _.471500547 _MEYER GERALD W 0430 -00083 519971 0052 468166755 PRETTNER JOSEPH 8 0430 -00084 812000 0052 472241484 REINERT EDWARD A 0430 -00085 631.69 0052 4703462 24 TEVLI N •JR HARRY 0430w00086 6 25 .59 t 31 052 5, 643.82 + 0053 472683970 AHL -JR.RAY C 0430 -00087 774,99 0053 472481310 ELIAS JAMES G 0430 -00088 703.74 t j 3P 0053 1672461 09 GEISSLER WALTER M 0430 4P00089 606.34 t 40 31 0053 501464671 GESSELE JAMES T 0430 - 00090 807.50 t 4 0053 475441688 PECK DENNIS L 0430 -00091 549.76 t 1 4.3 i.14l 13053 _472662522 IE @E WII.LIAN 0430 -00092 512.14_4.? 4 t 053 3 +4: 0054 473683775 LOFGREN JOHN R 0430 -00093 446.87 C 1 4 F 0054 446.87 t 0059 471562563 BREHEIM ROGE Y 0430 -00094 531 .14 0058 4 776025 82 EDSON DAVID B 0430 -00095 5 89.67 t 1 0058 470541590 MULWEE GEORGE W 0430 - 00096 50107 t 0058 4 71 501314 NA DEA U EDWARD A 0430- 00 5 52 .917 0058 468361720 NUTESON LAVERNE-S 0430 -00098 474.45 i 0053 471365993 OWEN GERALD C 0430 —OOJ99 595.08 t 0059 3 w 244.31 t :..0059 4 7624 9760 MACDONALD JOHN E 0430 -00100 515s92 0059 475501900 PULYANEY DENNTS M 0430m00lCt 691.93 t j 0059 t 1 t 7 r,..... a _......... ,.... ,. .. . .....r.........w ...._.., ., ... s CITY OF MA PLE WOOD i PAYROLL- CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8008 CHECK DATE 05.04 -R4 PERIOD ENDING 04 -27 -84 PAGE 4 DEPT - NO EMPL - NO EMPLOYEE 'NAME 01 CHECK - NO AMOUNT CLEARED 3 0061 477301366 BRENNER s 0061 468341993 NRUMMEL 1 0061 473260389 OOEGARD MATTHEW 0061 468582618 STAPLES 1 '0061 THOMAS C C430- 00112 0062 4 7492 8762 BRENNER THOMAS 0062 471 447219 BURKE P 0062 4746081 82 EERMA TN 0430 -00116 0062 4 72 30 3411 GU -SI40A 0062 474924209 HAAG E 0062 502544121 HELEY 0430 -00120 0062 468584797 NnPKI NS 0062 473969784 hUNTER G 0062 471748313 LIBHARDT 0430 -00141 0062 473503915 LIROORFF 0062 473565506 MARUSKA G 0062_474078128...RASCHK 0430 -00145 0062 477646662 SANDOUIST 0.00 0062 476203439 SANTA 0062 475904189 TOWNLEY 0062 477881931 TOWNLEY 0.00 0062 475745266 YARD 0.00 t x 1 0000 t x )3 0063 475823190 BA RTH OLMY lit 0063 270483797 BLACK z '0063 4744424 74 BUNKE331,0063 476924605 4 0.00 0063 469948845 FALTEISEK 0.00 0063 476686996 HERBER 0.0n 0063 4708R1140 JOHNSON 0000 0063 474743915 KORTUS 0063 468984615 KRUMMEL c 006 3 470269324 MAC DONALD c x 0063 476923936 MAGILL x ) 0063 473700729 NANRE 0063 470926903 MESSIN x 0063 474966150 MIHELICH x ) 11063 469848105 PEARSON x 0063 472941928 PELTIER x 0063 468827763 RADA 0063 469742645 SPANNBAUER j 0063 477920170 STRAUS x ) 00.63 4 70 62 64 22 T. -A UBMA N x 0063 47^963203 WALLACE 0063 395324246 ItARO x ) 7063 414606610 ZAHN fjF 0000 t x 0063 I LOIS J 0430 -00102 BARBARA A. 0430 -0010 3 ROBERT D 0430 -00104 PAUL INE 6430 - 00105 JAY A 0 43 0 -0010 6 MYLES R 0430 -00107 DAVID A 0430 40108 MELVI N J 0430 - 00109 MATTHEW J 0430 ROLA ND B 0430 -00111 THOMAS C C430- 00112 TONY M 0 430 -00113 THOMAS 0 0430 -00114 DENNIS P 0430 -00115 MARK A 0430 -00116 ALBERT F 0430m0011? THOMAS J 0430 -00118 REED E 0 4 3 0 -001 19 MICHAEL F 0430 -00120 PATRICK J 0430 -00121 TROY G 0430 - 00122 JODY P 0430 -00123 WILLIAM J 0430 -00124 RICHAR H 0430 -00125 ELIZABETH J 0430 -00126 JAMES E 0430 -00127 KAR IN J 0430 -00128 JOSEPH A 0430 -00129 JAMES M 0 4 3 0 - 00130 BECKY J 0430 -00131 ELAINE E 0430 -00132 JOSEPH M 0430 -00133 MICHELE A 0430.00134 KATHLEEN M 0430 -00135 CINDI L 0430 -00136 LESLIE A 0430 -00137 MICHAEL R 0430.00138 MICHAEL F 0430 -00139 KATHLEEN G 0430 -00140 LAURA J 0430 -00141 DOUGLAS J 0430 -00142 JON T 0430 -00143 ROY G 0430 -00144 WILLIAM A 0430 -00145 74 C. 2 3 108981 157007 972010 589.80 c 1 X827.78 t 0000 t x 1 4 5.16 t: 566018 19006e22 If 308.53 667.67 452.50 t 112.41 t t 0.00 x ) 598.93 6 7 3.61 t 2 0.00 t x ) 0000 t x )z. 1 5.0.51 t 3x 3 0.00 c x 3 0.00 t x 1 0000 t x )3 4 +3 j . 0000 c x) 3' 41 23.75 4 0.00 t x i' 4. 0.00 t x ) 0.0n c x 0000 t x 4 0000 t x )a 0.c x 0.00 c x 0000 t x ) 0000 t x O.OQ t x )15 0.0n t x 0000 If x 0.00 c x 0000 c x ) 0000 t x 5 9 4.7 8 t f,r. 0.70 c x )i6, 218931 t fjF 0000 t x 7. 896.84 * 7 t 7' 74 C. CITY OF. PAPLFWOCD PAYROLL- CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8008 CHECK GATE 05 -04.84 PERIOD ENDING G4 -27 - 84 PAGE 5 DEPT EM °L — NO EMPLOYEE NAME CHECK - NO AMOUNT CLEARED 0064 151440508 GREW JANET M 0430 -00146 519.56 0064 471 384624 HORSNELL JUDITH A 0430. 00147 2 58.57 t 0064 474542163 SOUTTER CHRISTINE 0430 -b0148 30001 t r 1 j 0064 19078014 *f 0071.389448993 C.HLEBECK .JUDY M 0430.00149 357 * 20 t 1 0071 4705405 51 OLSON GEOFFREY W 0430 -00150 802.86 r OOt1 1 , p160.06 : 0072 4776271 7$EKSTRAND TMOMAS G 0430 -00151 563.02 00?2.475608505 JOHNSON_..RANDALL L 0430 -00152 513 M 007.2 19076 0073 476090677 OSTROM MARJORIE 0430 -00153 799.55 i 0074 387520776 WENGER ROBERT J 0430 -00154 563.80 t s 1 0074 563.80 1 0042 468461930 CLAUSON DALE K 0430 - 00155 1 tOUNT:._O.0-15.4 _._ _ _ _..__GRAND TOTAL 634518.02 3 :j J 1 r ti 1 r.. Ka C 4v 1 1 ` r i r r I 04 _ MEMORANDUM T0: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: Budget Transfer - Administrative Intern DATE: May 7, 1984 Action by CeL:w^ . Endorsed.___ y R e j e C t1 e 11.__ _ PROPOSAL It is proposed that a budget transfer be approved to finance the costs of an administrative intern for the s- ummer. Urvnpniimn The attached correspondence indicates that new federal regulations have been adpDted dealing with administrative requirements to prohibit discrimination of the handi- capped. These requirements apply to all governments that receive in excess of 25,000 revenue sharing funds. (Maplewood will receive $193,530 i n .1984.) The most difficult requirement to comply with is the preparation of a formal self- evaluation report to determine i f any City programs, activiti policies and practices are in non-compl with the handicapped regulations, Attached is a self-evaluation checklist that gives an indication of how comprehensive the report must be, This self - evaluation report must be prepared by October 17, 1984. Failure to comply with the regulation would cause the City to lose its revenue sharing funds . Four methods of preparing the self - evaluation report have been considered: a) Hire a consultant b) Use existing staff c) Request the Hunan Relations Commission to prepare the report. d) Hire an administrati intern The first three options were dismissed for the following reasons: a) An outside consultant would be too expensi b) Existing. staff lacks available time to prepare such a comprehensive report. c) It is not realistic to expect a volunteer commission to devote the large amount of time needed to prepare the report. Therefore, by process of elimination, the hiring of an administrative intern for the summer to prepare the self- evaluation report appears to be the best alternative. The City's pay range for an administrative assistant is $3.35 to $7.35 per hour. For 12 weeks of full - time employment, the maximum cost would be $3,528. The 1984 Budget included a $54,000 appropriation for the purchase of a PBX phone system. However, a consul report last November indicated this would not be financially f Therefore, it is proposed that part of the appropriation be used to finance the cost of are administrative assistant. RECOMMENDATI It is recommended that the Council approve a $3,530 budget transfer (from the Capital Outlay Budget for phones to the Temporary Employees Wages Budget) to finance the cost of an administrative intern. DFF:1 nb ST OI W fJ x OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY ter- X71399 w WASHINGTON, D.C. 20226 a DIRECTOR OFFICE OF REVENUE SHARING 2401 E STREET, N.W. COLUMBIA PLAZA Dear Chief Executive: This correspondence is the f ollowup information referred to in our January 9, 1984 newsletter from the Office of Revenue Sharing. On October 17, 1983, the Office of Revenue Sharing published final regul- ations in the Federal Register prohibiting handicapped discrimination. These rules, which were previously in interim form, were issued as a result of a Federal Court ruling in the case of Paralyzed Veterans of America et al v. Smith et al. General regulations prohibiting handicapped discrimination have been in effect since April 6, .1977. The regulations issued on October 17, 1983, have been in effect since August 14, 1981, in temporary form with the admin- istrative requirements deferred. The delay in the effective date of the final regulations resulted from the need to obtain additional comments and to review the administrative provisions. The final administrative require- ments include the following: Notice Requirements Designation of Responsible Employee Adoption of Grievance Procedure Self - evaluation -- Transition Plan Small Recipient Governments' Requirements Requirements in Regulations of other Federal Agencies The ORS will monitor compliance with these requirements as they become due through the usual enforcement procedures. Enclosed is a copy of the f inal regulations, a summary of the admini- strative requirements and additional information to facilitate implementation. If you have questions concerning these regulations , please contact the Of f ice of Revenue Sharing, Intergovernmental Relations Division at (202)634-52000 Enclosures sL.L L Ca O Sincerelyrel `=c y , .L 0 m a 0 •- ' 031 Michae Hill o u n 9 Ef V v j 0 a LIJ r-'C. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY s r--L =' WASHINGTON, D.C. 20226 1714 ; DIRECTOR OFFICE OF REVENUE SHARING SAO E STREET. N .W. OUTLINE GDttJMSI A PLAZA ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS OF REVENUE SHARING HANDICAPPED DISCRIMINATION REGULATIONS I. Notice [ Section 51.55(e) ; Section 51-55(k)(6)] A. Governments receiving more than $25,000 in revenue sharing funds have 90 days from the effective date of the regulations (by January 17, 1984) to give initial notification to the public, applicants and employees that they have a policy against handicapped discrimination. The notice must in- clude the name of the "responsible employee" designated to coordinate imple- mentation of the handicapped discrimination requirements. B. Notifications must be made in a manner that ensures the visually and hearing impaired will receive them. Methods of providing notice include postingostin notices in public places, publication in newspapers and magazines, announcements on radio and television. Statements of the policy against handicapped discrimination also should be included in recruitment materials and other publications. C. Recipients also must take continuing steps to notify the public of specific changes made to improve access to programs and activities by the handicapped. II. "Self - Evaluation -- Transition Plan" [ Section 51.55(c) ; Section 51.55(k)(5) A. Recipients have one year from the effective date of the regulations by October 17, 1984) to evaluate programs and activities, policies and practices to determine areas of noncompliance with the handicapped discrimi nation regulations and to make "nonstructural changes" to achieve compliance. Efforts should be made to involve handicapped individuals and their organi- zations in the self - evaluation process. B. Recipients must determine. if "structural changes" are needed as part of the self - evaluation and, if changes are needed, prepare a transition plan describing how the changes will be made over a period not to exceed three years (no later than October 17, 1986). C. Governments that receive more than $25,000 in revenue sharing funds must make a copy of the self - evaluation and transition plan available for public inspection and maintain it on file for three years. III. Des i nation of a Responsible Employee and Adoption of Grievance Procedures [Section 51.55(d) A. Governments that receive more than $25,000 in revenue sharing funds must designate one, individual or office (by January 17, 1984) to be respon- sible for coordinaion of efforts to comply with the handicapped discrimin- tion regulations. The name of the designated "responsible employee" must be included in the initial public notice described in Part I above. B. Governments receiving more than $25,000 in revenue sharing funds must adopt a grievance procedure (by October 17, 1984) to provide for prompt and equitable resolution of complaints alleging handicapped discrimination other than complaints concerning employment or post - secondary educational institutions). 2 - IV. Administrative Requirements for Small Recipients [Section 51.55(f) ] Governments that receive less than $25,000 in revenue sharing funds may be required to comply with the administrative requirements from which they are initially exempt, if found by ORS to have discriminated against the handicapped. Compliance would be for remedial purposes. V. Administrative Requirements in Pre - existing Regulations The new administrative requirements are part of the existing regulations of a number of Federal agencies, e.g. Health and Human Services and the Depart- ment of Education. Requirements such as the self-evaluation met for other Federal agencies may be used as part of the efforts to comply with the require- ments for revenue sharing purposes. Timetable for Implementing GRS Handicapped Requirements Effective Date of Regulations - October 17, 1983 GRS Recipients Receiving More Than $25,000 Annually Designate a "responsible employee" [Section 51.55(d)(01; initial notification to the public of the GRS Handicapped Require- ments [Section 51.55(e) ] - January 17, 1984 GRS Recipients Receiving More Than $25,000 Annually Adopt a grievance procedure Section 51.55(d)(2) ] - October 17, 1984 All GRS Recipients- Completion of "Self-Evaluation and make nonstructural changes Section 51.55(c) ] - October 17, 1984 If structural changes are needed - October 17, 1984 as a result of self - evaluation, a " Transition Plan" must be prepared [Section 51.55(k) (5) ] All GRS Recipients- Complete structural changes for accessibility (other than to transportation systems) [Section 51.55(k)(4) ] - October 17, 1986 OI TyF OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20226 1784 DIRECTOR OFFICE OF REVENUE SNARING 2401 E STREET. N.W. COLUMBIA PLAZA ** SELF — EVALUATION CHECKLIST ** This checklist is meant only as a guide. It pinpoints areas which each local government should examine when undertaking the self - evaluation required by the handicapped regulations. The self - evaluation must be. completed by October 17, 1984, and must cover all areas of each government (regardless of where revenue sharing funds are spent). This list contains many areas which should be scruti- nized, however, it is _not meant to be all- inclusive Availability of services, programs and benefits to handicapped persons Deliver programs, services in alternative manner or at a more accessible site Perform home visits to provide services, benefits Provide auxiliary aids to improve service provision Modify or redesign facility or equipment Public notices to blind or hearing impaired persons Physical accessibility to facilitie us by the public Elevators Parking Lots Ramps Entrances Doors and Doorways Stairs Rest Rooms Floors, Floor Coverings Water Fountains Public Telephones Identification (for rooms or offices) Lighting Walkways, Street Crossings, Curbs Warning Signals Switches and Controls (Lights, heat, etc.) Public Meeting Rooms Hazards (manholes, protruding or low- hanging objects) Governments are not necessarily required to make each existing facility, or every part of an existing facility accessible to and usable by the handicapped. It is expected that governments will ensure that their programs and activities, when viewed in their entirety, are accessible and usable by handicapped individuals. Policies and practices concerning employment Employment practices - applications, recruiting, advertising, interviewing, physical examinations., testing, etc. Personnel policies - processing of - applications. position descriptions, job classifications, hours of work, fringe benefits, training, promotions, lay- offs, evaluations, etc. On -going employee seminars to promote understanding Ef fective grievance procedures Reasonable accommodation for disabled persons Contractual arrangements made by recipient government Accessibility of leased or rented buildings, facilities Provision of secondary recipient services Notification of the handicapped requirement in contracts and agreements For further information, contact the following: National Center f or a Barrier Free Environment 1015 15th Street, N.W. Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone Number ( 202)466 -6896 ` American National Standards Institute, Inc. 1430 Broadway New York, NY 10018 Telephone Number (212)354 -3300 President's Committee on Employment of the Handicapped 1111 20th Street, ' N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone Number (202)653- 5044_ Accent -On Information Computerized Retrieval System) P. 0. Box 700 Bloomington, I1 61701 Telephone Number (309)378 -2961 Mainstream, Inc. 1200 15th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone Number (202)833-1136 Any of your State or local associations and organizations for the blind, hearing impaired, disabled veterans, vocational rehabilitation and other organizations and consultants offering assistance concerning the environ- mental needs of handicapped persons. Monday, October 17, 1983 Department of the Treasury Office of Revenue Sharing Discrimination on the Basis of Handicap 1 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Office of Revenue Sharing 31 CFR Part 51 Fiscal Assistance to State and Local Governments; Discrimination on the Basis of Handicap AGENCY: Office of Revenue Sharing, Department of the Treasury. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: Pursuant to order of the Court in Paralyzed Veterans of America et al. v. Smith et al., this rule makes final the interim regula- tion implementing the incorporation of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Ac t of 1983 into 31 U.S.C. 6701 through 6724 the "Revenue Sharing Act." Section 504 prohibits discrimination on the basis of han- dicapped status in programs of Federal financial assistance. Except for section 51.55(bXiXix), the provi- sions of the interim regulation that. were previously deferred now take effect. EFFECTIVE DATE: October 17, 1983. 31 CFR is amended by adding 151-55 to read as follows: 151.55 Discrimination on the basis of handicap. a) Definition. As used in this section the phrase: 1) "Handicapped individual" means any person who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, has a record of such an impairment, or is regarded as having such an impairment. 2) "Physical or mental impairment" means (i) any physiological disorder or condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss affecting one or more of the following body systems: Neurological; musculoskeletal; special sense organs; respiratory, including speech organs; cardiovascular; reproductive, digestive; genitourinary; hemic and lymphatic; skin; and endocrine; or (ii) any mental or physiological disorder, such as mental retardation, organic brain syndrome, emotional or mental illness, and specific learning disabilities. The term "physical or mental impairment" includes, but is not limited to, such diseases and conditions as orthopedic, visual, speech and hearing impairments, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis, cancer, heart disease, diabetes, mental retardation, emotional illness, drug addiction and alcoholism. 3) "Major life activities" means functiens such as caring for one's self, performing manual tasks, walking, seeing, hearing, speaking, breathing, learning, and working. 4) "Has a record of such an impairment" means has a history of, or has been misclassified as having, a mental or physical impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities. 5) "Is regarded as having an impairment" means (i) has a physical or mental impairment that does not substantially limit major life activities, but that is treated by a recipient government as constituting such a limitation; (ii) has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits major life activities only as a result of the attitudes of others toward such impairment; or (iii) has none of the impairments defined in paragraph (a)(1) of this section but is treated by a recipient government as having such impairment. 6) "Qualified handicapped individual means (i) with respect to employment, a handicapped individual who, with reasonable accommodation, can perform the essential functions of the job in question; and (ii) with respect to services, a handicapped individual who meets the essential eligibility requirements for the receipt of such services. b) General prohibitions with respect to discrimination against o qualified handicapped individual. 1) Those general prohibitions described in § 51.52(b) of this subpart, also apply to discrimination against a handicapped individual, with the exception of § 51.52(b)(1) (ii), (iii) and iv) of this section which are covered by the provisions of this subsection. In addition, a recipient government shall: i) Not exclude a qualified handicapped individual from participation in programs or activities open to the general public, regardless of the availability of permissibly separate or different programs or activities designed especially for the handicapped; ii) Administer programs and activities in the most integrated setting appropriate to the needs of qualified handicapped individuals; iii) Fake appropriate steps to ensure that communications with applicants, employees, beneficiaries, and the general public are available to persons with impaired vision or hearing, through means such as brailled or taped material, telecommunication devices, televised information or other media; iv) Take the appropriate steps to ensure that the public hearings required under § §' 51.13 and 51.14 of this part are accessible to qualified handicapped individuals and that notice of such hearings is made available to individuals with impaired vision and hearing, through means such as . telecommunication devices, brailled or taped material, televised information, qualified sign language interpreters or other media; v) Provide a qualified handicapped individual with an aid, benefit, or service that is as effective in affording equal opportunity to obtain the same result, to gain the same benefit, or to reach the same level of achievement as that provided to others; vi) Not provide a different or separate aid, benefit, or service to qualified handicapped individuals or to any class of qualified handicapped individuals than is provided to others unless such action is necessary to provide qualified handicapped individuals with aid, benefits, or services that are as effective as those provided to others; vii) Not aid or perpetuate discrimination against a qualified handicapped individual by funding an agency, organization, or person that discriminates on the basis of handicap in providing any aid, benefit, or service to beneficiaries of the program or activity; viii) A recipient government shall not, directly or through contractual or other arrangements, utilize criteria or methods of administration that: A) Have the effect of subjecting qualified handicapped individuals to discrimination on the basis of their. handicaps; B) Have the purpose or effect of defeating or substantially impairing accomplishment of the objectives of the recipient government's program with respect to handicapped individuals; or C) Perpetuate the discrimination of another department of the recipient government if both departments are subject to common administrative control or are agencies of the same recipient government; and ix) Reserved) 2) The exclusion of persons that are not handicapped individuals from the benefits of a program limited by Federal statute or executive order to handicapped individuals, or the exclusion of a specific class of handicapped individuals from a program limited by Federal statute or executive order to a different class of handicapped individuals, is not prohibited by this section. 3) For purposes of this section, aids, benefits, and services, to be equally effective, are not required to produce the identical result or level of achievement for handicapped and non hand icapped- individuals. They must, however, afford qualified handicapped individuals equal opportunity to obtain the identical result, or achievement in the most integrated setting appropriate to the individual's needs. 4) A recipient government which government receives $25,000 or more entitlement funds in each entitlement period, shall, at the request of, and in consultation with such individual, provide appropriate auxiliary aids to individuals with impaired sensory, manual or speaking skills, where necessary to prevent a qualified handicapped individual from being denied the benefits of, excluded from participation in or subjected to discrimination under a program or activity. Such auxiliary aids may include brailled or typed material, the provision of qualified sign language interpreters, the provision of telecommunication devices, captioned films, video tapes, televised information or other media. The Director may require recipient governments which receive less than 25,000 in entitlement funds in each entitlement period to provide appropriate auxiliary aids when the Director finds that such aids are appropriate to remedy a violation of the provisions of this section. 5) The enforcement provisions contained in this subpart are applicable to violations of the provisions of this section. c) Self - evaluation. 1) A recipient government shall, within one year of the effective date of this section, with the assistance of interested individuals, including handicapped individuals and organizations representing them: i) Evaluate its current policies and practices and their effects which do not meet the requirements of this section; ii) Modify any policies and practices that do not meet the requirements of this section, and take appropriate remedial steps to eliminate the effects of any discrimination that resulted from adherence to these discriminatory policies and practices, except as otherwise provided where structural changes may be required pursuant to paragraph (k) of this section. 2) Self- evaluations already prepared or under preparation) to comply with the Section 504 requirements imposed by other Federal departments or agencies, may be used as part of the self - evaluation required pursuant to this section. 3) The self - evaluation may incude but is not limited to an examination of: a recipient government's policies and practices concerning employment decisions; the extent to which its programs and activities are readily accessible to and usable by the handicapped; whether its policies and practices concerning the delivery of aids, benefits and services to beneficiaries are free from discriminatory effects on the handicapped; and, whether it is engaging in contractual arrangements which have the effect of subjecting handicapped persons to discrimination. 4) A recipient government, which government receives $25,000 or more entitlement funds in each entitlement period, shall, for at least three years following completion of the evaluation required under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, maintain on file, make available for public inspection, and provide to the Director upon request (i) a list of the interested individuals consulted, (ii) a description of policies and practices examined and problems identified, and iii) a description of modifications made and remedial steps taken (record - keeping requirement cleared by OMB, No. 1505 -W36, through January 31, 1982). d) Designation of responsible employee and adoption of grievance procedures. 1) A recipient government, which government receives $25,000 or more entitlement funds in each entitlement period, shall designate at least one person to coordinate its efforts to comply with this section. Where designation of such a person has already been made to comply with the Section 504 requirements of other Federal departments or agencies, that person may also be used to comply with the requirements of this section. 2) A recipient government, which government receives $25,000 or more entitlement funds for one or more entitlement periods, shall adopt a grievance procedure that incorporates appropriate due process standards and that provides for the prompt and equitable resolution of complaints alleging any action prohibited by this section. Such procedures need not be established with respect to complaints from applicants for employment or from applicants for admission to post- secondary educational institutions. Existing grievance procedures may be used to meet the requirements of this subsection. e) Notice. 1) A recipient government, which government receives $25,000 or more entitlement funds in each entitlement period, shall take appropriate initial and continuing steps to notify participants, beneficiaries, applicants, and employees, including those with impaired vision or hearing, and unions or professional organizations holding collective bargaining or professional agreements with the recipient government, that it does not discriminate on the basis of handicapped status in violation of this section. The notification shall, state, where appropriate, that the recipient government does not discriminate on the basis of handicapped status in admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs and activities. The notification shall also include an identification of the responsible employee designated pursuant to section 51.55(d). A recipient government shall make the initial notification required by this paragraph within 90 days of the effective date of this section. Methods of initial and continuing notification shall ensure that the information is communicated to the visually or hearing impaired. Such methods may include the use of public service radio and television announcements, and telecommunications devices, the posting of notices, the publication of notices in newspapers and magazines, the placement of notices in recipient governments' publications, and the distribution of memoranda or other written and taped communications. 2) Whenever a recipient government publishes or uses recruitment materials or publications containing general information that it makes available to participants, beneficiaries, applicants, or employees, or the general public, it shall include in those materials or publications a statement that it is the policy of the recipient government not to discriminate against the handicapped in employment or the provision of services. A recipent government may meet the requirements of this paragraph either by including appropriate inserts in existing materials and publications or by revising and reprinting the materials and publications. f) Administrative requirements for small recipient governments. The Director may require any recipient government, which government receives less than $25,000 in entitlement funds in each entitlement period, to comply with the provisions of § 51.55 (c). (d), and (e), in whole or in part, when the Director finds that such requirements are appropriate to remedy a violation of the provisions of this section. g) Employment discrimination against a qualified handicapped individual. 1) A recipient government shall: i) Not discriminate against a qualified handicapped individual in employment in any program or activity; ii) Not participate in a contractual or other relationship that has the effect of subjecting a qualified handicapped applicant or employee to discrimination prohibited by this section. The relationships referred to in this paragraph include relationships with employment and referral agencies, with labor unions, with organizations providing or administering fringe benefits to employees of the recipient government, and with organizations providing training and apprenticeship programs; - iii) Make all decisions concerning employment under any program or activity in a manner which ensures that discrimination on the basis of handicap does not occur and not limit, segregate, nor classify applicants or employees in any way that adversely affects their opportunities or status because of handicap; iv) Take appropriate steps to ensure that communications with its applicants and employees are available to persons with impaired vision and hearing as described in § 51.55(b)(1)(iii) and (b)(4); v) Not discriminate against a qualified handicapped individual in the following specific activities: A) Recruitment, advertising, and the processing of applications for employment; B) Hiring, upgrading, promotion, award of tenure, demotion, transfer, layoff. termination, right of return from layoff, and rehiring; C) Setting rates of pay or any other form of compensation and changes in compensation; D) job assignments, job classifications, organizational structures, position descriptions, lines of progression, and seniority lists; E) Granting leaves of absence, sick leave, or any other leave; F) Providing fringe benefits available by virtue of employment, whether or not administered by the recipient government; G) Selection and financial support for training, including apprenticeship, professional meetings, conferences, and other related activities, and selection for leaves of absence to pursue training: H) Employer sponsored activities, including social or recreational programs; and I) Any other term, condition, or privilege of employment. 2) A recipient government's obligation to comply with this section is not affected by any inconsistent term of any collective bargaining agreement to which it is a party. 3) A recipient government's obligation to comply with this part is not obviated or alleviated because employment opportunities in any occupation or profession are more limited for handicapped individuals than for nonhandicapped individuals. h) Reasonalble accommodation. 1) A recipient government shall make reasonable accommodation to the known physical or mental limitations of a qualified handicapped applicant or employee unless the recipient government can demonstrate that the accommodation would impose an undue hardship on the operation of its program or activity. 2) Reasonable accommodation may include: i) Making facilities used by employees readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons, and ii) job restructuring, part -time or modified work schedules, acquisition or modification of equipment or devices e.g., telecommunications devices and other telephone devices), the provision of readers or qualified sign language interpreters, and other similar actions. Accommodations shall be made in consultation with the handicapped individual. 3) The determination of whether an accommodation would impose an undue hardship on the operation of a recipient government's program or activity shall be made on a case -by -case basis upon consideration of the following factors: i) The overall size of the recipient government's operations with respect to number of employees, number and type of facilities, and size of budget; ii) The type, composition and structure of the specific program or activity and the structure of the workforce required; and iii) The nature and cost of the accommodation needed. Such reasonable accommodation may require a recipient government to undertake more than an insignificant economic cost in making allowance for the handicap of a qualified applicant or employee and to accept minor inconvenience which does not bear on the ability of the handicapped individual to perform the essential functions of the job in question. 4) A recipient government may not deny any employment opportunity to a qualified handicapped employee or applicant if the basis for the denial is the need to make reasonable accommodation to the physical or mental limitations of the employee or applicant. i) Employment criteria and policies. 1) A recipient government may not use any employment test, selection criterion or policy, that screens out, or tends to screen out from consideration for employment, a handicapped individual or any class of handicapped individuals unless: i) The test, selection criterion or policy as used by the recipient, is shown to be directly related to the essential functions of the position in question, and ii) Alternative job - related tests, criteria or policies that do not screen out, or tend to screen out as many handicapped individuals are shown to be not available. 2) A recipient government shall select and administer tests using. procedures (e.g., auxiliary aids such as readers for visually- impaired individuals or qualified sign language interpreters for hearing- impaired individuals) that accommodate the special problems of handicapped individuals to the fullest extent consistent with the objectives of the test. The test results shall accurately reflect the applicant's or employee's ability to perform the essential functions of the job in question, rather than the applicant's or employee's impaired sensory, manual or speaking skills, except where such skills are essential requirements of the job. 3) If a recipient government has established a test, selection criterion or policy that explicitly or implicitly screens out, or tends to screen out, a class of handicapped individuals from a particular job, and cannot establish that the class as a whole is unqualified to perform the job, the recipient government shall evaluate each such individual who applies for the job to determine whether the applicant can perform the essential functions of the job in question despite the handicap. As part of the determination, the recipient government shall also decide whether such applicant would be qualified to perform the essential functions of the job in question through reasonable accommodation without undue hardship, as provided in § 51.55(h) of this section. j) Preemployment inquiries. 1) Except as provided in paragraphs j) (2) and (3) of this subsection, a recipient government may not conduct a preemployment medical examination or make preemployment inquiry of an applicant as to whether the applicant is a handicapped individual or as to the nature or the severity of a handicap. A recipient government may, however, make preemployment inquiry into an applicant's ability to perform the essential functions of the job. 2) When a recipient government is taking remedial action to correct the effects of past discrimination; when a recipient government is taking voluntary action to overcome the effects of conditions that resulted in limited participation in a program or activity, or when a recipient government is taking affirmative action, the recipient government may invite applicants for employment to indicate whether and to what extent they are handicapped provided that: i) The recipient government states clearly on any written questionnaire used for this purpose or makes clear orally, if no written questionnaire is used, that the information requested is intended for use solely in connection with its remedial action obligations or its voluntary or affirmative action efforts; and ii) The recipient government states clearly that the information is being requested on a voluntary basis, that it will be kept confidential as provided in paragraph (j)(4) of this section, that refusal to provide it will not subject the applicant or employee to any adverse treatment, and that it will be used only in accordance with this section. 3) Nothing in this section shall prohibit a recipient government from conditioning an offer of employment on the results of a medical examination conducted prior to the employee's entrance on duty, provided that: (i) all entering employees are subjected to such an examination regardless of handicap, and (ii) the results of such an examination are used only in accordance with the requirements of this section. 4) Information obtained in accordance with this section as to the medical condition or history of the applicant shall be collected and maintained on separate forms and shall be accorded confidentiality as used for medical records, except that: i) Supervisors and managers may be informed regarding restrictions on the work or duties of handicapped individuals and regarding necessary accommodations; ii) First aid and safety personnel may be informed, where appropriate, if the condition might require emergency treatment; and iii) Government officials investigating compliance with the Act shall be provided relevant information upon request. k) Program accessibility. —(1) Discrimination prohibited. No qualified handicapped individual shall, because the facilities owned or leased by a recipient government are inaccessible to or unusable by handicapped persons, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity of a recipient government, which government receives entitlement funds. 2) Existing facilities. --(i) Program accessibility. A recipient government shall operate each program or activity in existing facilities owned or leased by it, so that the program or activity, when viewed in its entirety, is readily accessible to and usable by handicapped individuals. Recipient governments are not necessarily required to make each existing facility, or every part of an existing facility accessible to and usable by handicapped individuals. Where structural changes are necessary to make programs or activities in existing facilities accessible, such changes shall be made as soon as practicable, but.in no event later than three years after the effective date of this regulation except as otherwise provided in this section. Recipient governments shall not be required to revoke leases on which lessors refuse to make the structural changes needed if no more accessible facility is available, but shall use the provisions of subparagraph (ii) to ensure that the maximum possible accessibility is achieved. ii) Methods of compliance. A recipient government may comply with the requirements of paragraph (1) of this section through such means as redesign of equipment, the use of telecommunications devices or other telephone equipment, reassignment of classes or other services to accessible buildings, assignment of aides to beneficiaries, home visits, delivery of health, welfare, or other social services at alternate accessible sites, alteration of existing facilities and construction of new facilities in conformance with the requirements of paragraph (k)(7) of this section, or any other methods that result in making its programs or activities accessible to handicapped individuals. A recipient government is not required to make structural changes in existing facilities where other methods are effective in achieving compliance with paragraph (k)(1) of this section. In choosing among available methods for meeting the requirements of paragraph k)(1) of this section, a recipient government shall give priority to those methods that offer programs and activities to handicapped persons in the most integrated setting appropriate to obtain the full benefits of the program. 3) Exception for small recipient governments. If a recipient government, which government receives less than 25,000 in entitlement funds, in each entitlement period, determines, after consultation with a handicapped individual seeking a health, welfare or social service, that there is no method of complying with paragraph (k)(1) of this jection other than making a significant hlteration in its existing facilities, that government may, as an alternative, refer the handicapped individual to other providers of those services that are accessible at no additional cost to the handicapped individual. Examples of other providers of those services are States, counties or other larger units of local government. 4) Time periods. --(i) Nonstructural changes for accessibility. Where a recipient government has determined that certain nonstructural changes are necessary to make its programs and activities readily accessible to and usable by the handicapped, after evaluating its policies and practices during the self - evaluation required pursuant to subsection (c), these changes shall be made, with other modifications determined to be needed, within the one year period for completion of the self- evaluation. ii) Structural changes for accessibility. Except as otherwise provided in subparagraph (iii), where a recipient government has determined that structural changes in facilities are necessary to make its programs and activities readily accessible to and usable by the handicapped, after evaluating its policies and practices during the self - evaluation required pursuant to paragraph (c), those changes shall be made as soon as possible but not later than three years from the effective date of this section. iii) Transportation systems. Transportation systems shall be made accessible to qualified handicapped individuals as provided in paragraph k)(1) of this subsection in the same manner and within the time periods prescribed in regulations issued by the Department of Transportation (49 CFR Part 27, Subpart E). 5) Transition plan. In the event that structural changes to facilities are necessary to comply with the requirements of paragraph (k)(1) of this section, a recipient government shall develop, within one year of the effective date of this section, a transition plan setting forth the steps necessary to complete such changes within the time periods in paragraph (k)(4) of this. section. The plan shall be prepared as part of the self - evaluation required under J 51.55(c) and developed with the assistance of interested individuals, including handicapped individuals or organizations representing handicapped individuals. Transition plans already prepared (or under preparation) to comply with the Section 504 requirements imposed by other Federal agencies, may be used as part of the transition plan required pursuant to this section. A recipient government which government receives $25,000 or more in entitlement funds shall make a copy of the transition plan available for public inspection for a period of three years and furnish it to the Director upon request. The plan shall, at a minimum: i) Identify physical obstacles in the recipient government's facilities that limit the accessibility of its program or activity to handicapped individuals; ii) Describe in detail the methods that will be used to make the facilities accessible; iii) Specify the schedule for taking the steps necessary to achieve full program accessibility and, if the time period for the transition is longer than one year, identify steps that will be taken during each year of the transition period; and iv) Indicate the person responsible for implementation of the plan. 6) Notice. The recipient government shall adopt and implement procedures to require that interested individuals, including individuals with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of particular services, activities, and facilities that are accessible to and usable by handicapped individuals. 7) New construction. The construction of facilities by a recipient government financed in whole or in part with entitlement funds or the construction of a facility pursuant to a contract for the recipient government to lease the building facility in its entirety, on or after January 1, 1977, shall be accomplished so as to be readily accessible to and usable by handicapped individuals. 8) Alterations. Alterations to existing facilities owned, or leased by a recipient government, which alterations are funded with entitlement funds and commenced on or after January 1, 1977, shalt, to the maximum extent feasible, be designed and constructed to be readily accessible to and usable by handicapped individuals. 9) American Notional Standards Institute Accessibility Standards. Design, construction, or alteration of facilities in conformance with the American National Standard Specifications for Making Buildings and Facilities Accessible to, and Usable by, the Physically Handicapped," published by the American National Standards Institute, Inc. (ANSI A 117.1 -1961 1971)),' which is incorporated by reference, shall constitute compliance with paragraphs (k) (1) and (2) of this section. A recipient government also may use the revised ANSI standards issued in May of 1980, which are also incorporated by reference and are obtainable at the same address. A recipient government may use standards other than the 1961 or 1980 standards or other methods, if the government establishes that it is clearly evident that equivalent or better access to the facility Copies obtainable from American National. Standards Institute. Inc.. 1430 Broadway. New York. N.Y. 1001"212) 354-3300. Copies are also on file with the Federal Register. or part of the facility is provided. 10) Exception for construction projects commenced prior to January 1, 1977. The provisions of this subsection do not apply to buildings or construction projects, including those funded with revenue sharing funds, commenced prior to January 1, 1977. including those funded with revenue sharing funds, unless it is determined that programs or activities funded in whole or in part with revenue sharing funds are conducted within or make use of such facilities, in which case, those programs and activities must be readily accessible to and usable by handicapped individuals as described in paragraphs k)(2) (i) and (ii) of this subsection. 11) "Commencement of construction " defined. A construction project shall be deemed to have commenced when the recipient government has obligated itself by contract for the physical construction of the project or any substantial portion of the project. 1) Coordination of unresolved legal issues. Whenever the Director receives a complaint which alleges a violation of the provisions of this section and involves a legal issue that has not been resolved judicially or administratively, the Director shall request guidance from the Department of justice which was designated by Executive Order 12250 to coordinate Section 504, within one week of receipt of such complaint. The Director may defer action on the complaint pending receipt of the guidance if it is determined that such guidance will be received within one month from the issuance of the request. Thereafter, the Director shall then act in accordance with the guidance. If the Director determines that the Department of justice cannot provide guidance concerning the proper course of action within a period of one month (30 days), the Director shall proceed to initiate fact- finding activities with respect to the complaint. During that process, the Director shall continue to keep the Department of justice advised of the actions taken, pending receipt of the guidance requested. Appendix A— Section -by- Section Analysis Section 31.55 Discrimination on the Basis of Handicap Most of the approximately 50 comments on the proposed regulations concerned discrimination on the basis of handicap, as provided in. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. As with the previous proposed handicapped discrimination regulations, the majority of the comments expressed concern about the cost of compliance and objected to specific provisions such as the definition of handicapped individual, the self - evaluation requirement and the accessibility requirements. The Department has little discretion concerning the substantive provisions contained in these regulations. Executive Order 11914 Nondiscrimination with Respect to the Handicapped in Federally Assisted Programs" requires Federal departments and agencies with Section 504 responsibility to issue regulations consistent with the standards and procedures established by HEW. Comments requesting elimination of or major revisions to these provisions were not acted upon due to the requirements of the Executive Order, which was issued to ensure consistent Federal enforcement of Section 504. Revisions have primarily been made for ` clarification purposes and in some instances to make the substantive requirements conform more closely with the requirements for the General Revenue Sharing Program. One such revision is that all references in the proposed rule to special provisions for smaller recipient governments as those employing fewer than 15 employees have been changed to those receiving $25,000 or more in entitlement funds in each entitlement period. The reference to fewer than 15 employees has little relevance for the General Revenue Sharing Program which unlike grant programs, provides financial assistance to States and local governments, as opposed to particular departments and agencies or even private entities. The number of recipient governments which employ fewer than 15 persons is negligible. Further, the independent audit requirements in Section 123(c) of the Revenue Sharing Act exempt local governments receiving less than $25,000 in entitlement funds. In the interest of consistency with this Congressional guidance, the General Revenue Sharing Program's . final regulations prohibiting discrimination on the basis of handicap, should also incorporate the $25,000 standard. Section 51.55(b) entitled, "General prohibitions with respect to discrimination against a qualified handicapped individual" contains the prohibitions against discrimination in the provision of services. Section 51.55(b)(1) (iii) and (iv) were amended in response to comments that the provisions did not provide sufficient guidance concerning how recipients can make communications and services available to persons with impaired sensory, manual and speaking skills. Examples of methods were added to the regulations. Section 51.55(b)(1)(v) was deleted and a new § 51.55(b)(4) was added to expand the discussion of how to provide appropriate auxiliary aids to individuals with impaired sensory, manual and speaking skills. It is noted that auxiliary aids must be provided only at the request of the handicapped individual. Further, recipient governments must consult with the individual to determine the most appropriate auxiliary aids to be used. It is expected that requiring such aids only upon request, as recommended by organizations representing the handicapped, will reduce the cost of providing handicapped individuals with access to programs and activities. It will do so in a manner that will meet as closely as possible the individual needs of the handicapped. Section 51.55(b)(1)(iv), which requires that the public hearings required under the Act and regulations be accessible to the handicapped, was amended in response to comments to how such hearings can be made more accessible. Proposed § § 51.55(b)(1) (vi), (vii) and viii) are redesignated § 51.55(b)(1) (v), vi) and (vii). Further, § 51.55(b)(1)(vii) was amended to remove reference to secondary recipients because this definition is currently under review. This does not mean, however, that secondary recipients (as currently defined) are not covered by these provisions. Section 51.55(b)(1)(ix) has been redesignated § 51.55(b)(1)(viii). One commenter suggested that subparagraph C) had been drafted too narrowly, prohibiting discrimination against a secondary recipient only if subject to the common administrative control of a recipient government. This subparagraph was amended to delete the reference to the secondary recipient situation and to clarify that where a recipient government funds a particular department in whole or in part with revenue sharing funds, any subdivision of that department cannot use those funds to discriminate. Section 51.55(c) "Self- evaluation" was reorganized to improve its clarity. This section was amended to clarify that where the self - evaluation discloses the need to make structural changes, those changes are to be made within three years, rather than the one -year period provided for the self - evaluation. A new subsection (c)(2) was also added to allow recipient governments to use self - evaluations already undertaken for departments such as HHS or the Department of Transportation. This provision was added to improve the coordination of Federal enforcement of Section 504. A new subsection (c)(3) was added in response to comment that the proposed regulations did not provide sufficient guidance as to what a recipient government is to evaluate. Essentially, a recipient government must review all of its policies and practices concerning the provision of services, employment and the selection of facilities to determine their impact upon the handicapped and devise methods to remedy the effects of discrimination found. In implementing the self - evaluation and transition plan, a recipient government must review all policies and practices, not just those in which revenue sharing funds are currently being expended. This is because a recipient government potentially can spend revenue sharing funds for any purpose permissible under State and local law, therefore, review only of those areas in which such funds are actually expended would not affect those programs and activities which may be funded in the future. Further, a large number of recipient governments appropriate revenue sharing funds to their general funds resulting in the expenditure of revenue sharing funds in part to support all governmental functions. Lastly, this position is consistent with other revenue sharing compliance activities. Recipient governments are requested to conduct public hearings not solely on the use of revenue sharing funds, but also on the use of those funds in relation to their entire budget. Recipient governments are also required to conduct independent audits. Such audits, must encompass all funds of the recipient government, not just those in which revenue sharing funds are placed. Section 51.55(d), "Designation of responsible employee and adoption of grievance procedure" was amended to provide that individuals designated to coordinate Section 504 compliance for other Federal departments and agencies and existing grievance procedures may be used to comply with the requirements of The General Revenue Sharing Program. Section 51.55(e), "Notice" was amended to provide examples of how public notices can be communicated to the sensory impaired. Section 51.55(f), "Administrative requirements for small recipient governments" was amended to provide that a small recipient government may be required to comply with the administrative requirements to remedy violations found by the Director. A number of commenters expressed the view that the administrative requirements were too burdensome on smaller recipient governments and should never be required. Others objected to any lessening of the requirements for smaller recipient governments. In an effort to balance these competing interests, the exceptions for smaller recipient governments are maintained but such governments may be required to comply with the applicable provisions. Section 51.55(g) "Employment discrimination" was amended to add a new subsection (g)(1)(iii) because it is one of the basic prohibitions contained in the NEW .Guidelines and is therefore required to be contained in the regulation. Proposed Sections 51.55(g)(1)(iii) and (iv) are redesignated iv) and (v). In response to comments, 51.55(g)(1)(iv) was amended to include examples of how communication can be made available to the sensory impaired. Concerning this section, one commenter questioned whether a recipient government can be required to undertake affirmative action to employ the handicapped. Section 504 does not require affirmative action, as does Section 503. Section 504 requires only that recipient governments refrain from discriminating and undertake remedial action where discrimination is found. Section 51.55(h), "Reasonable accommodation" was amended in response to comments to add examples of reasonable accommodation for the sensory impaired. The section was also amended to provide that the accommodations shall be made in consultation with the handicapped individual. One commenter requested greater specificity concerning what is required for reasonable accommodation. Considering the broadness of the definition of handicapped individual, what constitutes reasonable accommodation must be determined on a case -by -case basis and the regulation must remain broad. A new sentence is added to subsection (h)(3)(iii) to reflect the fact that an accommodation that causes inconvenience to the recipient government or results in some economic cost is not per se unreasonable. Section 51.55(1), "Employment criteria and policies" was revised to conform subparagraph (2) more closely to the HEW regulations. Several comments suggested the application of the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures to these provisions. The Guidelines specifically apply only to race, color, national origin, sex and religion. If they are formally revised to apply to handicapped discrimination, the Director will adopt that application. One commenter questioned the use of the phrase "class as a whole" in subsection (i)(3). The Director does not agree that the phrase should be changed. To be able to use a selection procedure which excludes a class of handicapped individuals as a whole, the recipient government must establish to the satisfaction of the Director that no member of that class of individuals would be able to perform the essential functions of the job in question. Section 51.55(k), "Program accessibility" received a majority of the comments relating to the cost of compliance. It is emphasized that compliance with this subsection does not mean that recipient governments will be forced to retrofit all. of their public buildings. For a particular program or activity to be accessible, it is not required that the entire facility in which the program or activity is conducted be accessible. Structural changes to facilities are required only after all other means of making programs accessible have been pursued. Recipient governments should first, as part of the self- evaluation, review their program and activities to determine which ones are not accessible; then, recipient governments should determine how those programs and activities can be made accessible. Where structural changes are required, the transition plan should be prepared at the same time as the self - evaluation. Non - structural changes which can be made to achieve accessibility should be accomplished as part of the modifications and remedial action required during the self - evaluation. A period of one year is given for the whole self - evaluation process. It is not likely that the review part of the self- evaluation can be completed within 80 days. Accordingly, the subsection (4) time periods are amended to allow the non - structural changes to be made, with other modifications required under the self - evaluation, during the one year period. Structural changes are still required within three years unless transportation systems are involved, as provided in the proposed rule. A number of comments were received on § 51.55(k)(10). "Leased facilities." The Director agrees that this provision as written needed clarification. It is important, however, to make it clear that a recipient government cannot avoid the program accessibility requirements merely by conducting its programs and activities in leased . facilities. Accordingly. Section 51.55(k)(10) has been eliminated and subsections (k) (1), (2), (k) (7) and (8) have been amended to clarify that programs and activities operated in existing facilities, owned or leased by the recipient government, must be accessible. Where a recipient government leases a facility, it must make whatever non - structural changes are necessary to make facilities accessible. Where an existing facility is leased, however, structural changes will not be required if the lessor refuses to make them and no other more readily accessible facility is available. Subsection 51.55(k)(2) is amended to add examples of how greater accessibility can be achieved for handicapped individuals with sensory impairments. Existing facilities newly leased after January 1, 1977, or on which leases are renewed must meet the requirements of 51.55(k)(2) for existing facilities. Leases of newly constructed facilities must meet the requirements set forth in 51.55(k)(7) for new construction. Alterations to existing facilities which are leased must meet the requirements of § 51.55(k)(8). Section 51.55(k)(5), "Transition plan" was amended to extend the time period for preparation to one year, in order that it could be prepared in conjunction with the self- evaluation. The proposed rule was amended to provide that transition plans prepared to comply with Section 504 requirements for other departments or agencies may also be used to comply with the requirements for the General Revenue Sharing Program. Section 51.55(k)(9) is amended to incorporate the 1980 American- National Standard Institute Standards, as well as the 1961 version and allow compliance with either. Proposed § 51.55(k)(10), as discussed above, was eliminated. Proposed § 51.55(k) (11) and (12) have been redesignated § 51.55(k) (10) and 11). One commenter suggested that the definition of commencement of construction be amended to conform with definition contained in the HEW regulations. In this instance, however, the provision being interpreted is one uniquely included in the Revenue Sharing Act and need not be consistent with HEW's definition. One commenter suggested that subsection (k) should provide specific provisions concerning the need for structural changes to historical properties. However, the regulations, with their emphasis upon program accessibility over structural changes to facilities, do not need specific treatment of historical properties. A new § 51.55(1) is added to the regulations to cover the situation in which the ORS is requested to act upon a complaint concerning subject matters unresolved by another Federal agency, the agency in charge of coordination of Section 504, or by the courts. One example of such an unresolved issue is whether obesity should be considered a handicap. Another example is whether all public television broadcasting must be captioned for the deaf. The Department of Education is currently involved in litigation on this issue and at the same time the complainants have filed a complaint with the ORS. This provision is particularly needed because the ORS supports an almost unlimited range of programs and activities of State and local governments that are under the primary jurisdiction of other departments and agencies. The Director has determined that the ORS should defer action on matters not resolved until the coordinating agency provides guidance in the intent of uniformity of Federal enforcement of Section 504. In this way, the ORS will hopefully avoid prematurely creating solutions to unresolved problems in this still evolving area of the law. The coordinating agency referred to is the Department of Justice pursuant to Executive Order 12250, which supersedes Executive Order 11914, which gave such authority to the old Department of HEW. At the same time, the Director is concerned that consultation with the coordinating agency may impede resolution of complaints 'in the expeditious manner required by the Revenue Sharing Act. In order to ensure that coordination will take place as expeditiously as possible, and at the same time allow for flexibility, the regulations would require the Director to consult with the coordinating agency within one week. The Director would also have to make a determination as to whether the Department of Justice will act within thirty (30) days. If guidance cannot be expected within thirty (30) days, the Director shall begin to obtain preliminary information needed to investigate the complaint once the request for guidance is received. The ORS may defer making any findings until the Department of Justice has provided the necessary guidance. With these safeguards, possible deferral of action on the complaint should not result in undue delay in the processing of complaints. Accordingly, when a complaint concerning unresolved issues under Section 504 is received, the Director would immediately consult with the appropriate. lead agency and act upon the guidance received. MFR Doc. 80 -4069- Filed 12- 214 8 -. 12.22 pmt arLUNG CODE w10-is-M E'3 Action by Council MEMORANDUM °yE j C i- L To: Barry E vans , City M a n a 9 a r `` W- "----- --"- - - - From: Robert Odegard, Director of Community Servi Y Subj: Acceptanc of $100 From Maplewood Coin Club Date: May 4, 1984 We are in receipt of a check for $100 from the Maplewood Coin Club which meets at the Heritage Center. I request that the City Council accept this contribution and designate it for the purchase of cardtables to be used at the Heritage Center. A letter expressing our thanks.and gratitude will be sent to the Maplewood Coin Cl ub. e MEMO T0: CITY MANAGER EVANS , el 4 C: FROM: CITY CLERK REGARDING: HEARING DATE - COMMERCIAL REVENUE NOTE - KINDER CARE LEARNING CENTER DATE MAY 8 1984 Application for a Commercial Revenue Note in the amount of $400,,000 has been received from Kinder -Care Learning Centers. They propose to construct a day care facility on the north side of County Road D, west of White Bear Avenue (100 feet west of Midas Muffler). A hearing date of June 11, 1984 is recommended. 1 a' FIRST CORPORATE SERVICES, INC. INVESTMENT BANKERS SUITE 206 822 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA SS402 612) 332.09SS April 25, 1984 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 RE: City of Maplewood - $400,000 Commercial Development Revenue Note Kinder -Care Learning Centers) Gentlemen: At the request of Kinder -Care Learning Centers, we have conducted a study of the economic feasibility of the proposal that the City of Maplewood issue one or more of its revenue bonds under the provisions of the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act to provide funds for the acquisition and construction of a child learning center located within the City of Maplewood, to be owned by Kinder -Care Learning Centers. Our study has led us to the conclusion that on the basis of current finan- cial conditions, the Project is economically feasible and the revenue bond(s) of the City can be successfully issued and sold. We propose to purchase said bonds as a single debt instrument, subject to approval of the Project by the City of Maplewood and the Commissioner of Energy and Economic Development and agreements as to the terms and conditions of the loan. We understand a copy of this letter will be forwarded by the Mayor of the City of Maplewood to the Energy and Economic Development Authority of the State of Minnesota to serve as the letter of feasibility required by the Authority. Very Truly Yours, Richard J. Nordlund Vice- President RJN /aw 14ATTMM J. L8Vn0r COLE OEHLaa RoaaRT M. Bvwax A. LAVaaxca Davis FR,Lwa HA-ocaxn LEONARD J. KEYES Ronzrr G. SsASa JOHN M. SULIJV" BasxARD P. Fin= Burr E. SwAxsox M. J. GALVIx, J$. DAVaD G. FORzzzw Joax J. McNaasz MONEIL V. SEntoU11, JR. Jazzy F. Rory Tzwmoz N. Domx RlnsAan H. RMX . Joxx L. DavxaY R. L. So$msox PETER H. Saab SAxmxL L. HARsoR RoxA= E. Oucamw JOHN TaoYzH STaP IM Wngwlcx Avwx L. GozwN JOHN R. KwnmGK JOHN R. FaIEDYAx DAVID J. SPaxcEB DANIEL J. GoLz, JR . Parag W. SmanQs DouGLAs L. SKoa MIGN -In H. JERownm R. SooTT DAv s J PATRICK McDAvrn Jory B. VAN DE Nomm,JR. BicsA.an G. MANN ANDaaw G. BacH$8 JAMES E. Naum JEROME A. Gars STEvz A. BRAND JOEL R.GOTTasm" ALAN H. MAmm LAW OFFICES BRIGGS AND MORGAN PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 68101 TELEPHONE (612) 291 -1218 TELECOPIER (612) 222 -4071 INCLUDING THE FORMER FIRM OF LEVITT, PALMER, BOWEN, ROTMAN & SHARE April 26, 1984 Jalrpmm F. SHAW JOHN H. Lnmsmox MATTHEW L. Lavin RicyrA D..Axnassox DAvm G. GREENING SAU.Y A. SOoOGIx Davin B. SALAD DAvm G. McDoxAm JOSEPH P. NosOK BRUCE W. MooTY GHASLES R. HAYxOR VlRonalA A. DwzEa Axas$A M. Boim E$Ic Nnssox MAMMi H. Fisa Awmmw R. KnaznzoEn JOHN BuLTExA FREDERICK P ANGST JAxzs G. RAY ROBERT L. LEE RiGHAJiD H: M&R37N Taunt R. GAsTzAzoao TRUDY- J. 1WAY it L Fm7.A BzTH J. AxDHEws NAM L.1PPaL Gazoo$Y J. STExxoE ROHEH7 E. Wows GIIABI.Es B. RooE$s Romm L. HAWSER TERRY L. SLYE . WILLIAM J. JOAxis MARY M. DYRSETS MARGARET K. SAVAGE Kzvix A. Bzao BmAy G. BwasLE ToNT STEYBERGER 02 COUNSEL MARY SCHAFFNER EVINOEa J. NEIL. MonTox MICHAEL H. STRrdTER RICITARD E. R= JOHN M. PALMER SAMUEL H. MOROAN FRANZ N. GBSHAM Mrs. Lucille Aurelius City Clerk 1380 Frost Avenue T Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Mr. Richard J. Nordlund First Corporate Services Suite 206 822 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Re: City of Maplewood - Commercial Development Revenue Bonds (Kinder -Care Learning Centers Inc. Project) Dear Lu and Dick: Enclosed in connection with the above - referenced matter are five copies of the following documents: 1. Application to the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority 2. Resolution Calling for a Public Hearing 3. Preliminary Resolution Granting Preliminary Approval to the Project 4. Form of transmittal letter of the City of Maplewood 5. Form of preliminary opinion letter of Briggs and Morgan 6. Form of feasibility letter to be executed by_ First Corporate Services 2WO FIRST NATIONAL ACNE DV=INO fi40p I IDS CEMM31 SAINT PAUL, l[INNESMA !36101 XINNl,:APOLIS, KnMESOTA 55402 91ft) fiW•1s'15 (61g) 330 -0861 BRIGGS .&zvn MORGAN April 26, 1984 Page Two I have drafted these documents assuming that the Calling for the Public Hearing will be adopted on May 14, 1984_ and that the public hearing will be held on June 11, 1984 at 7 :10 p.m. After the Resolution Calling for the Public Hearing has been adopted, Briggs and Morgan will undertake to publish the notice of public hearing. A copy of these documents should be on file in the office of the City Clerk until the public hearing for inspection by any interested City residents. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Mary L. Ippel MLI /jlg Enclosures a This Application must be submitted in DUPLICATE STATE MINNESOTA MINNESOTA ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ' Application For Approval of Municipal Industrial Revenue Bond Project T o: Minnesota Energy and Economic Date Development Authority 484 Cedar-St., Rm. 100 Hanover Bldg. St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 . The governing body of Maplewood County of Ramsey Minnesota hereby applies to the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority of the State of Minnesota for approval of this corrmun ity's proposed Municipal Industrial Revenue Bond issue as required by Minn. Stat. 5474.01, Subd. 7a. . We have entered into preliminary discussions with: Firm Kinder -Care Learning Centers, Inc. Address 4505 Executive Park Drive . 36116 • Cy Montgomery State Alabama State of Incorporation Delaware Attorney BBriggs and MMorgan -' BBond .Counsel Name f P . Kinder -Care Learning Centers, Inc.o T hi • •. bus .Development of childThisfirmisengagedprimarily % (nature of learning and day care facilities The funds received from the sale of the Industria• Revenue Bonds will be used. to (general nature of project) Acquire land and construct thereon a 5 s • ft. ch learning and day care facility I`t will be located in Maplewood - The total bond issue will be approximately S 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 . , to be applied toward p aymen of cos now estimated as follows: Acquisition, reconstruction, improvement, betterment, or extension of project Cons truC ti on Costs Equipment Acquisition and Installation Fees: Architectural, engineering, inspec- tion, fiscal, legal, administration, or printing Interest accrual during construction Initial .bond reserve font i ngenc l es bond discount Other ' RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL Q FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF A NOTICE OF THE HEARING WHEREAS, a) Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, known as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (the "Act ") gives muni- cipalities the power to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of the encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to prevent so far 'as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; _ b) The City Council of the City of Maplewood (the "City ") has received from Kinder --Care Learning Centers, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (the "Company ") a proposal that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter described, through the issuance of its industrial revenue bonds (which may be in the form of a r ing le debt instrument) (the Bonds ") pursuant to the Act; c) Before proceeding with consider- ation of the request of the Company it is necessary for the City to hold a public hearing on the proposal pursuant to Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b, Minnesota Statutes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. A public hearing on the proposal of the Company will be held at the time and place set forth in the Notice of Hearing hereto attached. 2. The - nature of the proposal and an estimate of the principal amount of bonds to be issued to finance the P roposal are described in the attached form of Notice of Hearing. 3. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Energ and Economic Development Authority, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together with proposed forms of all attachments and exhibits thereto, is on file in the office of the City Clerk. Clerk is hereby4. The City C1 Y authorized and directed to cause notice of the hearing to be given one publication in the official newspaperaer and a newspaper of general circulation available in the City, not less than 15 days nor more than 30 days prior to the date fixed for the hearing, substantially in the form of the attached Notice of Public Hearing* Adopted b the City Council of the City of Maplewood,p Y Y Minnesota, this 14th day of May, 19840 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Notice is hereby given that the City . Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota will meet at the City Hall in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota at 7:10 p.m. on June 11, 1984, to consider the proposal of Kinder -Care Learning Centers, Inc., that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter described by the issuance of industrial development revenue bonds . Description of Project The proposed project shall consist of the acquisition of ' land and the construction thereon of a 5,000 square foot child learning and day care facility to be located on the North side of County Road D, South of Highway 694, and West of White Bear Avenue (100 feet West of the Midas Muffler Shop) in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota. The maximum aggregate estimated principal amount of bonds or other obligations to be issued to finance this project is $400,000. The project will be initially owned and operated by Kinder -Care Learning Centers, Inc. The bonds or other obligations if and when issued will not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance upon any property of the City except the project and such bonds or obligations will not be a charge against the City's general credit or taxing powers but will be payable from sums to be paid by Kinder -Care Learning Centers, Inc. pursuant to a revenue agreement. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Energy and Economic Development Authority, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, is available for public inspection beginning May 15, 1984, from 9:00 a.m.. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, at the City Hall in Maplewood, Minnesota. 4 At the time and place fixed for the Public ring, the Council of the City of give I who sppear at the hearing an c._ portuni ty to express with respect to the proposal. Dated this 14th day of May, 19840 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL) By /s/ Lucille Aurelius City Clerk APPLI CATI ON/AGREEMENT FOR TAX EXEMPT MORTGAGE REVENUE NOTE FINANCING This Agreement is hereby entered into between he City of Mapl ewood , Minnesota, -hereinafter called the "Ci and __ K113 -elm Caste. _7L-hereinafter called the "applicant". The applicant is requesting financing for a development project and desires that the City issue notes according to the terms of the Municipal Industrial Development Act of 1967 as amended. In order for the application to be cons . dered by the Ci ty , the applicant hereby agrees to pay all costs involved in the legal and fiscal review of the proposed project and all costs involved in the issuance of said notes to finance the project It is further agreed and understood that the City reserves the right to deny any application for financing in any stage of the proceedings prior to adopting the resolution authorising the issuance of notes. 1. APPLICANT: a. Business Name b. Business Address - LSD$ xec r k Dy I L,.e. e Oa r 74) ( rtnerc. Business Form (corpora ti n, hip, sole proprietorship, etc.) d. Authorized Representative - e. Telephone - 332095,5 2, NAME(S) OF MAJORITY STOCKHOLDERS, OFFICERS &DIRECTORS, PARTNERS, PRINCIPALS: a . P h1,,,,c b. P Q g CtZAA. co 'T*k i d. e. 3. INCLUDE A PROPERTY LINE MAP SHOWING EXACT LOCATION OF PROPERTY, NAMES OF ADJACENT STREETS, AND DIMENSIONS OF PROPERTY, 4. NATURE OF BUSINESS a. Briefly describe the project. proposal: o i 1arc 400A 4" v. COh V4VIV I a WX 0( lqo So t4- r &$1^0 1J IVER) b. Is the project associated with an existing Maplewood Business? Yes No . If yes: Relocation ExpansionRehabilitation 3. AMOUNT OF CITY FINANCING BEING REQUESTED: $ y ' 000 b. PURPOSE OF REQUESTED FINANCING: . a. Business purpose to be served. T k e Qroe - otiowi C( ;e-0 s1 Sle b. Public purpose to be served.TO k Ih. mellf-wood 0-c 7. BUSINESS PROFILE• a. Number of employees in Maplewood: Full Time Part Time Before this project p o After this project b. Projected annual sales: $ 2 00, BgO c. Projected annual payroll: S. NAMES OF: a. Financial consultant for the business: b. Legal counsel for the business: y c. Corporate counsel : , Q + Pir e-S g CA+ 9. WHAT IS YOUR TARGET DATE FOR: a. Construction start: TuKe, y b. Construction completion: Nev i 'RN Name of Applicant Signature of Aulhorized Representative T1 e Date 7thefollowingitemsmustbesubmittedwiththisapplicationtotheCommunity Development Department: 1. ip to 2. A resolution setting a hearing date 3. An application to the Commissioner of Securities for approval of Municipal Industrial Revenue Bond. project If you have any questions on items 2 or 3, call the City Clerk, Lucille Aurelius, 770 -4500 MORTGAGE REVENUE NOTE CRITERIA Adopted 10 -16-80 A. Definitions 1. Existing Business shall be defined as a presently operating industry or commercial enterprise with at least one year of operational history within the City 2. New Business shall be defined as any industrial or commercial enterprise which does not qualify as an existing business., B. Project E l i g i b i l i ty Guidelines 1. The project shall be compatible with the overall development plans of the City, 9 , i ncl udi n the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning, and Community Design Review Board standards 2. The project shall not require a significant mount of public expenditures for City improvements such as roads, sewers, and waterma i ns 3. The P roject shall involve an existing business that the City wishes to expand or a new business which the City wishes to attract: a. Existing Business Criteria Any expansion, relocation, or rehabilitation of an existing business b. New Business Criteria 1. Offers significant new employment, opportunities, based upon the nature of the use, on a year around basis, or 2. The project involves the rehabilitation of a vacant or scheduled to be vacated structure, or 3. The ro osed location is within a designated development or redevelop -P P ment target area, and 4. Possesses a low potential far creating, pollution. r 4. The number of businesses of the same general nature in the area of the proposed projectect shall be considered in determining the need for commercialP revenue note financing. 3. The note shall be for an issue of not less than $300,000 6 Construction must begin within one year of preliminary approval. C:. Application Processing Guidelines 14 City financing of the project shall be limited to the issuance of a single mortgage revenue note, to be marketed as a provate placement, 2 Final approval shall not be granted by the City Council until the project has received approval with respect to zoning, site design, building design, or platting. 3. The applicant shall sign a memorandum of agreement providing that they will pay all costs involved in the legal and fiscal review of the proposed project and all costs involved in the issuance of notes to finance the project. 4. The City reserves the right to deny any application for financing at any stage of the proceedings prior to adopting the resolution authorizing issuance of the note. The purpose of the above date is to evaluate your proposal under City laws and policies. You may refuse to provide this data. Refusal, however, may jeopardize approval of your application. The above information will be made public to all who .request it. 2 S 1®- u 1F CAMP IWTlE¢s t M o 0 r N i T OT A L 5 ATE- ACU IbUiLVIuG hZEA FACC X04 s oelvEwhY AIZEh PLVG ?OUWV AeF-A 39, o'1 + 7,2100 0706 18, OeO$ t o. z W J; ot Q V Od i i I I I .f I I _. M AeE , ?20 , cgc S Cass cats S 2 10 2 ro t T 1 4' Co u N T Y e o p Q p V N O. t. MEMORANDUM r a TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Renewal LOCATION: 1564 E. Grandview Avenue APPLICANT /OWNER: David S. Suby . PROJECT: Tool Sharpening Home Occupation DATE: March 22, 1984 SUMMARY Action by Council: Endorse_ Yedif i e j e Da Le Request Renewal of a conditional use permit to operate a tool sharpening service as a home occupation. Proposed Land Use 1. The shop area is located in the basement and consists of an area about 10 x 15 feet or 16 percent of the basement are 2. Noise from the sharpening tools is not detectable off -site. 3. No more than two customers are expected on the premises at any one time. Ample off -site parking is available in the existing driveway. 4. Sharpening services include: lawn mower blades, circular saws, hand saws, skates, scissors, shears, drill bits and chain saw blades. 5. Evening hours are 6 p.m. to 9:30 p.m., Monday through Friday and 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Saturday. Comments Staff sees no reason to deny the permit renewal. There have not been any Problems generated by this home occupation. Recommendation Renewal of the conditional use permit for five years, subject to the applicant obtaining his yearly license. Approval is based ' on the finding that there have not been any problems generated by this home occupation. BACKGROUND Site Description 11. Size: 10,122 square feet 2. "Existing land use: rambler style, single dwelling approximately 912 squarefeetinareawithafullbasementr Surrounding Land Uses North: Grandview Avenue, across the street single dwellings East, south and west: single dwellings r%- -A. n - L. _ 5- 23 -83: Council approved a conditional use permit for the applicant subject to his obtaining a license each January. The applicant has done so. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 1. Land use designation: RL, residential lower density 2. Zoning: R -1, residence district (single dwelling) 3. Section 36- 442(e) of the zoning code states that all conditional use permits shall be reviewed by the council within one year of the date of initial approval. At that review the council may specify an indefinite term or specific term, not to exceed .five years, for subsequent reviews. The counci initial may impose new or additional conditions upon the permit at the time of the or subsequent reviews. A conditional use permit shall remai n in effect as long as the conditions agreed upon are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official con - trols to change the status of conditional uses. aw attachments: 1. Location map 2.. Property line/zoning map o KOHLIMAN AYE. = colly ROAD J J/ h i W Q J W iD . v o zrW00, 0- - aJ C f m c , GERVAIS I r LARK AvE. 25 ILELANID< o JUM TION AVE U N h C tZ H z s VE H G YAK W t, ff Ic 10 004 R 28 FROST v L IL F N AVE. g 0 = t FRISGIE AVE. IILL 44491 ' 3 tPLEr v E. Q SO PM IA AVE Z ao /eR Z :° 62 ILAJ P LE NT 2n F f AV E 0 t W KOHLMAN AVE. E DGEHILL RD. J 65 z DEM 4. AVE Z Q AVE i Cr AV II to AVE. W t9 SE XT 'T 11 6 }ERVAtS tRvLI AV AV CUr Fu- 3 L V.J C asTLE av C G A DVIEW 36 vi S H E R R E NNX, AVE COPE AVE LARK AVE. R LAURIE 1 RD. 25 CIE 1 SAIJDJIHQRSTI RKE AVE. g t` ELDRIDG J AVE a H 3 J y DE L MON 7 c AVE - N t < SKILLMA % m AVE " Z LR EN COPE AVE. LARK AVE. Z LAURiE RD Z 2 AVE D US N W 64 < BU KE AYE 4 M L1Pt.E M' t?D W PUBLIC WORKS 64 > FILDG. / r--- HA R i Q R W0 AVE. I .- v__ LAVEh m It M IR Q SU ER 4 W m 2 lyaAK a fi e!d `-' '* W ¢ i < Lakr e s z SOP AV! z PRi kE A GJ" < F-11 IFT-IF-11 W 0.- 29 IN AVE i 3 Z J PRICE Z AVE W N I IFIF11 IF LOCATION MAP 3 Attachment 1 Q N 1 R*4 3 z t; f P 4. 2366 1556 15 4 1572 1158011588 1 t rt f ik ' j 1 R - La K2 ag t i MEMORANDUM d' Action by Counc4L1; TO: City ' .Manager FROM: Associate PI anner -- Johnson Endorsed.._ SUBJECT: Time Extension--Prel imi nary Plat M dified. APPLICANT: Dezu ri k Companies Re ' ected LOCATION: Lar enteur Avenue and Parkway DriveP . y DatePROJECT: Bennington Woods DATE: April 12, 1984 Request Approval of a time extension for the Bennington Woods preliminary plat. Comments The applicant is making a good faith effort to develop this site in a timely manner. Final plat approval was granted on September 26, 1983 for the first phase. Two of the eight structures have been completed. This extension is needed to continue the phased development of the site without having to reapply for preliminary plat approval. The applicant anticipates that con- struction will be completed by September 1985. (See page 6) . Recommendation Approval of a two -year time extension for the Bennington Woods preliminary plat, on the basis the applicant is making a good faith effort to develop the site in a timely manner. BACKGROUND Past Action 5 -23 -83 Council approved the Bennington Woods preliminary plat, subject to: 1. city attorney approval of the declaration and bylaws for the condominium. These documents shall include language which: a. Will guarantee that only one homeowners' association w i l l be responsible for the maintenance of driveways and other common areas. b. Will require city council approval of any changes to the bylaws or declaration which effect the maintenance of the common areas or driveways. 2. Lots nine through twelve shall be designated as "unbui 1 dabl a parcels" in the declaration for the condominium homeowners' association document and deeds for the individual properties. 3. The final plat shall contain utility easements, as directed by the city engineer. 4. The developer shall be responsible for the drainage, erosion control, site grading and landscaping of the lots remaining under his control. If lots are not developed and not transferred to the home owners association, the developer shall prepare plans and submit them to the city engineer for approval. 9 -26 -83 Council gave final plat approval for the easterly portion of this site. Page. 4). Pl ann i ng Section 30 -5(e) of City Code states: For one year following preliminary approval... , unless the subdi v i der and the city agree otherwise, no amendment to a comprehensive plan or official control shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedication or platting required or permitted by the approved application. Thereafter, pursuant to its regulations, the city may extend the period by agreement with the subdivider and subject to all applicable performance conditions and requirements, or it may require submission of a new application, unless substantial physical activity and investment has occu rred in reasonable reliance on the approved application and the subdivider will suffer substantial financial damage as a consequence of a requirement to submit a new appl I_n connection with a subdivi involving planned and staged development, the cit may b resolution or a reement rant the rights referred to herein for such periods of time longer than two 2 ears which it determines to be reasonable and appropriate.3 mb Attachments: 1. Location map 2. Preliminary plat 3. Site plan map 4. Applicant's letter of request 2_ d i r I V 36 co r.- LARK CANAD W 35 ' AURIE 25 ELORt GE Son d !lELtroKT L A . L IKI m A ot o v M L A N A e R IV 0k AVE ! r OWNS AvE. III VERNON s E LLWm AV. Lw000 AVE. iwlMIER AVE. AV = o J O r t- ccfjt h 10 ac n W = W 4 0 SS 51 ST. PAUL. BURKE I E BE MONT t SKILLMAN W Lo E. S 26 r C l W J fApQ Phalan .-= U a- Loor ON VOW Bin 0 C .. ..... ms 4010 1 to Poo' or—A vrNurV"W 0 one W" -_ oft — "s. Osve of J Final Plat Approval September 26, 1983 PRELIMINARY PLAT 4 Attachment Two 11 MW W, 71. OWN pr Of MI IN 4r W*- IM-AM lLlW AM I I r De Furiek DESiGNERS&BW LDERS CUSTOM March 19, 1984 ONE The Honorable John Greavu Mayor of the City of Maplewood Members of the City Council City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 y RE: Bennington Woods Condominium Dear Mayor Greavu and Members of the City Council: I respectfully request approval of the remainder of the Bennington Woods Preliminary Plat which was approved last year. Bennington Woods is moving ahead. To date, B u i l d i n g s I and II have been completed. Construction of Building III is now scheduled to commence on or near April 1, 1984. The remaining buildings will be constructed as sales progress with the completion date of August 31, 1985 as our target. Since the requested extension is valid for a one year period, another extension will probably be requested near the same time next year. If you have any questions, please call me at 776 -1100. Thank you. Sincerely, Ted. E. DeZuri President Woodmark, Inc. b h 7330 Larpenteur Avenue East., St. Paul, MN 55117 Attachment Four 612) 776 -1100 if Eye It nu- iuhe•i firm i inrleyproide•ritly uM•n"I Brett ojwulyd. 1. MEMORANDUM Action b TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director .; Endorse RE: Employee Option to Defer Severance Pay Mod l f e "! DATE: April 30, 1984 Rej ec Date PROPOSAL It is proposed that employees be given the option of deferring all or part of their severance pay, without interest, when they termi pate ' empl oyment with the City. RArmpn IND Upq.n termination employment, all City employees receive severance pay for accum- ulated vacation hours and compensatory time off. In additi some City employees receive severance pay for a portion of their accumulated sick leave 'hours, depending upon the terms of their bargaining unit contract. Also, State law specifies that severance pay may not exceed one year's pay. When an employee retires, there could be a significant tax advantage . i f the employee were allowed to defer all or part of their severance pay to the year after retirement, This option is available to employees of other governmental entities. For exampl e, Ramsey County allows employees with at least 10 years .of service and 60 days of accumulated sick leave the option of deferring their severance pay until January 1st of the year after termination of employment. No interest is paid on the deferred severance pay at Ramsey County. For City of St. Paul employees, all severance pay- ments are made on February 20th of the year after termination of employment. Also., employees have the option of receiving their severance pay in deferred annual install- ments over a period of up to five years. No interest is paid on the deferred severance pay at the City of St. Paul. Allowing Maplewood employees the option of deferring all or part of their severance nay without interest would be beneficial to both the City and its employees It would be beneficial to the City as the deferred severance pay would be invested and.earn interest for the benefit of the City. It would be beneficial to City employees by reducing their income taxes. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the attached resolution be adopted which will give employees the option of deferri n all or part of their severance pay, without interest, when they terminate employment with the City. DFF:1nb i f. RESOLUTION WHEREAS,upon termination of employment, most City employees are eligible for severance pay,and i. WHEREAS,allowing employees to defer all or part of their severance pay, without interest, would be beneficial to both the City and its employees, NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED, that: 1.All city employees , upon termination of employment, shall be given the option to defer all or part of their severance pay. 2.All deferred installments of severance pay shall be paid without interest. . 3.All deferred installments of severance pay shall be paid in annual lump sum payments on the first payroll of each year. 4.The number of deferred annual installments shall be desig- nated by the employee, but the m %ximum number allowed shall be limited to five. 5.Employees shall specify, upon terminati of employment, the portion of his /her severance pay that is to be paid in each installment and these amounts may be adjusted upon written notice by former employees. r. 1 t I E r Action by Council: MEMORANDUM Endorsed._,.. Modified,._._.. Rejected,....,.. TO: CITY MANAGER Date FROM: CITY CLERK REGARDING: APPROVAL OF COMMERCIAL REVENUE NOTE - COMMERCIAL PARTNERS DATE: MAY 8 1984 commercial Partners has applied fora $1,100,000 Commercial Revenue Note to refinance the construction of their building at 1870 Beam Avenue (Hirschfields). They have paid the $1,000.00 filing fee deposit. R1 APPLICATION /AGREEMENT FOR TAX EXEMPT MORTGAGE REVENUE NOTE FINANCING This Agreement is hereby entered into between the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, hereinafter called the "City" and Commercial Partners /Maplewood hereinafter called the "applicant ". - a refundin note for E The applicant is requesting /financing or a development project and desires that the City issue notes according to the terms of the Municipal Industrial Development Act of 1.967 as amended. In order for the application to be considered by the City, the applicant hereby agrees to pay all costs involved in the legal and fiscal review of the proposed project and all cost s involved i n the issuance of said notes to finance the project. It is further agreed and understood that the City reserves the right to deny any application for financing in any stage of the proceedings prior to adopting the reso 1 ut i on authorizing the issuance of notes . 1. APPLICANT: . a. Business Name - Commercial Partners /Maplewood b. Business Address - 7801 East Bush Lake Road, Bloomington, MN c. Business Form (corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, etc.) - Partnersh: c. Authorized Representative - Robert Larsen e. Telephone - 612 - 835 - 9580 2. NAME(S) OF MAJORITY STOCKHOLDERS, OFFICERS & DIRECTORS, PARTNERS, PRINCIPALS: a. Robert Larsen bo c . d. e . 3. INCLUDE A PROPERTY LINE MAP SHOWING EXACT LOCATION OF PROPERTY, NAMES OF ADJACENT STREETS, AND DIMENSIONS OF PROPERTY. 4. NATURE OF BUSINESS a Brief describe the project proposal Strip shopping center already built . Vol b. Is the project associated with an existing Maplewood Business? Yes x No If yes: Relocation Expansion Reha 1 i ation 5. AMOUNT OF CITY FINANCING BEING REQUESTED: $ 1 6. PURPOSE OF REQUESTED FINANCING: a Business purpose to be served Refunding existing tax - exempt permanent revenue note b. Public purpose to be served Creation of jobs and increase tax base 7. BUSINESS PROFILE: a. Number of employees in Maplewood: Furl Time Part Time Before this Project -0- - 0- After this project -10- - b. Projected annual sales: $ 950,500. c. Projected annual payroll: $335, 8. NAMES OF: a. Financial consultant for the business: ' None b. Legal counsel for the business Maun, Green, Hayes, Simon, Johanneson and Brehl c. Corporate counsel: Not applicable 9. WHAT IS YOUR TARGET DATE FOR: a. Construction start: Project already constructed b. Construction completion: COMMERCIAL PARTNERS /MAPLEWOOD Name ; o rp ic 7 V-o t gna ure of u orize epresen a ive ManaginR Partner i e s/4 - 3 0 Date The following items must be submitted with this application to the Community Development Department: 1. A filing fee of .1% of th issue amount - $20,000 maximum; First $ to accompany application. 2. A resolution setting a hearing date . 3. An application to the Commissioner of Securiti for approval of Municipal Industrial Revenue Bond project If you have any questions on items 2 or 3, call the .City Clerk, Lucille Aurelius, 770-45200 MORTGAGE REVENUE NOTE CRITERIA Adopted 10-1-81 A. Definitions 1. Ex i s i t i ng Business shall be defined as a presently operating industry or commercial enterprise with at least one year of operational history within the City 2. New Business shall be defined as any industrial or commercial enterprise which does not qualify as an existing business. B. Project Elegibility Guidelines 1. The project shall be compatible with the overall development plans of the Cit y, 9 PincludingtheComprehensive Plan, Zoning, and Community Design Review Board Standards 2 . T h e Jro 'ect shall not require a significant amount of p u b l i c expendituresP for City improvements such as roads, sewers, and watermains 3. The ro ject shall involve an existing business that the C -i ty wishes toP expand or a new business which the City wishes to attract. a. Existing Business Criteria Any expansion, relocation, or r e h a b i l i t a t i o n of an existing business b. New Business Criteria 1. Offers significant new employment, opportunities, based upon the9P nature of the use, on a year around basis, or project . 'roThe involves the r e h a b i l i t a t i o n of a vacant or scheduled to be vacated structure, or 3. The ro osed location i s within a designated development or redeve 1-P P opment target area, and 4. Possesses a low potential for creating pollution. 4. The number. of businesses of the same general nature in the area of the proposed projectject shall be considered in determining the need for commercialP revenue note financing. 5. The note shall be for an issue of not less than $300,000 60. Construction must begin within one year of preliminary approval r. m , • DO Application Processing Guidelines 1.. City financing of the project shall be limited to the i sspiance of a single mortgage revenue note, to be marketed as a private placement. 2. Final a rova 1 shall not be granted by the City Council until the projectPP nhasreceivedapprovalwithrespecttozoning, site design, building design,g , or platting. 3. The applicant shall sign a memorandum of agreement providing that they will pay all costs involved i n the legal and fiscal review of the proposed projectject and all involved in the issuance of notes to finance the project. 4. The City reserves the rightht to deny any application for financing at anyg stage of the proceedings prior to adopting the resolution authorizing issuance of the note. 5. The applicant, at the time of the pbulic hearing, shall present schematicsPP of their proposal to give the City Council reasonable notice as to the nature and sign of their proposed building. b. Briggs and Morgan are to be retained as Bond Counsel. The ur ose of the above data is to evaluate your proposal under City laws and P a however may jeopardizepolicies . You may ref use to provide this data . Ref us 1, y approval1 of our application, The above information will be made p u b l i c to all PP y who request it. i' NOTE RESOLUTION CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1,100,000 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REFUNDING REVENUE NOTE COMMERCIAL PARTNERS/MAPLEWOOD PROJECT) ADOPTED: MAY 14, 1984 Note Resolution PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF A REFUNDING REVENUE NOTE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 474, MINNESOTA STATUTES, TO PROVIDE FUNDS TO , BE LOANED TO COMMERCIAL PARTNERS / MAPLEWOOD FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD the "City ") as follows: 1. Authority The City is, by the Constitution and Laws of the State of Minnesota, including Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, as am-ended (the "Act ") authorized to issue and sell its revenue notes for the purpose of undertaking an authorized project, to issue and sell notes to evidence temporary loans to be repaid from, the proceeds of revenue notes - when issued and to issue revenue notes to refund, in whole or in part, notes previously issued by the City and to enter into contracts necessary or convenient in the exercise of the powers granted by the Act and to pledge revenues of the project and otherwise secure such notes. 2. Authorization of Note and Series of Notes. The Cit y Council adopted . a resolution on February 19, 1981 ( the Resolution ") authorizing the issuance and sale of a revenue note of the City in the aggregate principal amount of One Million One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,100,000) pursuant to the Act to provide money to be loaned to Corrar.ercial Partners /Maplewood, a Minnesota general partnership (the Partnership "), to finance costs of acquiring, constructing and equipping a commercial building in the City (the "Project Building ") to be owned by the Partnership and leased to various tenants, together with necessary equipment (the "Project Equipr.ent ") to be located permanently in and become a part of the Project Building or the site thereof (the "Project Site" ) and necessary site improvements (collectively the "Project" as rrore fully defined in the Loan Agreement hereinafter n.enti.oned) . In anticipation of the issuance of the permanent revenue notes authorized by the Resolution and in order to provide temporary financing for the .Project, the City issued and sold its $1,100,000 City of Maplewood Industrial Developrr.ent Revenue Bond (Commercial Partners /Maplewood Project) (the "Temporary Note ") which matured on February 1, 1983. The City Council also issued and sold its $1,100,000 Industrial Development Permanent Revenue Note (Commercial Partners /Maplewood Project) (the "Permanent Note ") pursuant to the resolution adopted by this City Council on January 24, 1983. The City Council shall now issue and sell its $1,100,000 Industrial Development Refunding Revenue Note (Commercial Partners /Maplewood Refunding Project.(the "Note "). The City Council hereby determines that it is desirable and expedient to authorize, and the City Council does hereby authorize, the issuance and sale of the Note of the City in the aggregate principal amount of One Million one Hundred Thousand Dollars 1,100,000) to refund the Permanent Note. 3. Documents Presented. Forms of the following documents (the Documents relating to the Note and the Project have been submitted to and examined by the City Council and are now on file in the office of the City Clerk: a) Loan and Purchase Agreement (the "Loan s Agreement") among the Municipality, the Partnership and National City Bank of Minneapolis (the "Bank ") dated as of May 1984; b) Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Financing. Statement (the "Mortgage ") dated as of May , 1984, by and between the Partnership and the Bank, whereby the Partnership mortgages the Project Site, the Pro • ect Building and the Project Equipment ( the "Project Facilities") as security for the Note (this document not to be executed by the City) ; c) Loan Agreement Assignment (the "Assignment ") dated as of May _, 1984, whereby the City assigns to the Bank all of its interest in the Loan Agreement and Loan Repayments of the Partnership thereunder (subject to the provisions of Section 7.05) , for the purpose of securing the full and prompt payment of the Note; and d) Assignment Assignment ") dated as to the Bank, whereby leases of the Project this document not to of Rents and Leases (the "Lease of May _, 1984 from the Partnership the Partnership assigns the rents and Project to the Bank as security for th Note be executed by the City)* 2 4. Findings It is hereby found, determined and declared that: a) The Project, as described in paragraph 2 hereof and in the Loan Agreement, based upon the representations of the Partnership, constitutes a revenue producing enterprise and is a project authorized by and - described. in Section 474.02, Subd. la of the Act. b) The purpose of the Project is and the of fect thereof will be to promote the public welfare by: preventing the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; preventing economic deterioration; the development of sound industry and commerce to use the available resources of the community, in order to retain the benefit of the community's existing investment in educational and public service facilities halting the movement of talented, educated personnel to other areas and thus preserving the economic and human resources needed as a base for providing governmental services and facilities; adding to the tax base of the City and the county and school district in which the Project Facilities will be located. c) The Project has been approved by preliminary resolution of the Council duly adopted August 7, 1980, after a public hearing thereon, duly called and held and has been approved by the Commissioner of Securities of the State of Minnesota as tending to further the purposes and policies of the Act and on May 14, 1984, after reasonable public notice thereof, a public hearing was held pursuant to Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, at which hearing all parties who appeared were given an opportunity to express their views with respect to the Project. d) The issuance and sale of the Note, the execution and delivery of the Loan Agreement and the Assignment and. the performance of all covenants and agreements of the City contained in the Note, the Loan Agreement and the Assignment, and of all other acts and things required under the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to make the Note, Loan Agreement and the Assignment valid and binding obligations of the City in accordance with their terms, are permitted by the Act. 3 e) There is no litigation pending or, to the best of its knowledge threatened, against the City relating to the Project or to the Note or the Note Documents, or questioning the organization of the City or its power or authority to issue the Note or execute and deliver the Loan Agreement and the Assignment* f) The execution and delivery of and performance of the City's obligations under the Note, the Loan Agreement and the Assignment have been fully authorized by all requisite action and do not and will not violate any law, any order of any court or other agency of government, or any indenture, agreement or other instrument to which the City is a. party or by which it or any of its property is bound, or be in conflict with, result in a breach of, or constitute (with due notice or lapse of time or both) a default under any such indenture, agreement or other instrument. g) The Loan Agreement provides for payments by the Partnership to the Holder of the Note for the account of the City of such amounts as will be sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the Note when due. No reserve funds are deemed necessary for this purpose. The Loan Agreement obligates the Partnership to provide for the operation and maintenance of the Project Facilities, including adequate insurance, taxes and special assessments. h) As required by the provisions of Section 474.10 of the -Act, the Note shall recite that the Note is not to be payable from nor charged upon any funds other than amounts payable by the Partnership pursuant to the Loan Agreement . which are pledged to the payment thereof, and, in the event of default, moneys derived from foreclosure or other enforcement of the Note Documents; the City is not subject to any liability thereon; no Holder of the Note shall ever have the right to compel the exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the Note or_ the interest thereon, nor to enforce payment thereof against an property of the City the Note shall not constitute aYPP charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City; and such Note does not constitute an indebtedness of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. 4 5. Approval and Execution of Documents The forms of the Mortgage, Loan Agreement, Lease Assignment and Assignment referred to_ in paragraph 3 are approved. The Loan A reement and Assignment shall be executed in the name and on9 behalf of the City by the Mayor and the City Clerk in substantially the form on file, but with all such changes therein, not inconsistent with the Act or other law, - as may be approved by the officers executing the same, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by the execution thereof, The Mortgage and the Lease Assignment may contain such revisions as may be approved by the Bank and the Partnership. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, such other documents as are required by the Loan Agreement. _ 6. Approval of Terms and Sale of Note In order to refund the Permanent Note, the City shall proceed forthwith to issue its City of Maplewood Industrial Development Refunding Revenue Note (Commercial Partners /Maplewood Refunding Project) , in the authorized principal amount of $1,100,000 substantially in the form, maturing, bearing interest, payable in the installments and otherwise containing the provisions set forth in the form of Note attached hereto as Exhibit 1, which terms and provisions are hereby approved and incorporated in this Note Resolution and made a part hereof* A single fully registered Note, substantially in the form of Exhibit 1 to this Note Resolution, shall be issued and delivered to the Bank in the authorized principal amount of 1,100,000 and as authorized by the Act, principal of and interest on the Note shall be payable at the office of the registered owner thereof as it appears on the registration records maintained by the City Clerk in lawful money of the United States of America. The proposal of the Bank to purchase such Note at a price of $1,100,000 (100% of par value) is hereby found and determined to be reasonable and is hereby accepted. 7. Execution, Delivery and E of Note. The Note may be in typewritten or printed form and shall be executed by the manual signatures of the Mayor and the City Clerk and the official seal of the City shall be affixed thereto. When so prepared and executed, the Note shall be delivered to the.Bank upon payment of the purchase price therefor, and upon receipt of the signed legal opinion of Briggs & Morgan of Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota, bond counsel, pursuant to the Loan Agreement. The Note shall contain a recital that it is issued pursuant to the Act, and such recital shall be conclusive evidence of the validity and regularity of the issuance thereof. 8. Registration Records The City Clerk, as bond registrar, shall keep a bond register in which the City shall provide for the registration of the Note and for transfers of the Note. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to deliver a certified copy of this Note Resolution to the County Auditor of Ramsey County, together with such other information as the County Auditor may require, and obtain the certificate of the County Auditor as to entry of the Note on the County's bond register as required by the Act and Section 475.63, Minnesota Statutes. 9. Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Note If the Note is mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed, the City may execute and deliver to the Holder a new Note of -like amount, date, number and tenor as that mutilated, .lost, stolen or destroyed; provided that, in the case of mutilation, the mutilated Note shall first be surrendered to the City, and in the case of a lost, stolen or destroyed. Note,_ there shall be first furnished to the City and the Partnership evidence of such loss, theft or destruction satisfactory to the City and the Partnership, together with indemnity satisfactory to them. The City and Partnership may charge the Holder with their reasonable fees and expenses in replacing any mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed Note. lo. Transfer of N Person Treated as Holder The City will cause to be kept at the office of the City Clerk a Note Register in which, subject to such reasonable regulations as it may prescribe, the City shall provide for the registration of transfers of ownership of the Note. The .Note shall be initially registered in the name of the Bank and shall be transferable upon the Note Register by the Bank in person or by its agent duly authorized in writing, upon surrender of the Note together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the City Clerk, duly executed by the Bank or its duly authorized agent. The following form of assignment shall be sufficient for said purpose. For value received hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Note the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint of 0 attorney to transfer said Note on the books of said City with full power of substitution in the premises. The undersigned certifies that the transfer be made in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 170 Dated: Registered Owner Upon such transfer the City Clerk shall note the date of registration and the name and address of the new owner in the Note Register and in the registration blank appearing on the Note. The Holder seeking to transfer ownership of the Note shall also give written notice thereof to the Partnership. The Note shall continue to be subject to successive transfers at the option of the Holder of the Note. No service charge shall be made for any such transfer, but the City Clerk may require payment of . a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge payable in connection therewith. The person in whose name the Note shall be issued or, if transferred, shall be registered from time to time shall be deemed and regarded as the ' absolute Holder thereof for all purposes, and payment of or on account of the principal of and interest on the Note shall be made only to or upon the order of the Holder thereof, or its attorney duly authorized in writing, and neither the City, the City Clerk, the Partnership, nor the Bank shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. All such payments shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon the Note to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. 11. Amendments, Changes and Modifications to Loan Agreement, Assignment and this Note Resolution. Except pursuant to Section 9.03 of the Loan Agreement, the City shall not enter into or make any change, modification, alteration or termination of the Loan Agreement, Assignment or this Note Resolution. 12. Pledge to Holder Pursuant to the Assignment, the City shall.pledge and assign to the Bank and its successor Holders of the Note all interest of the City in the revenues of the Project and the Project Facilities, including all Loan 7 Repayments to be made by the Partnership under the Loan Agreement and moneys derived from enforcement of the Note Documents in the manner and to the extent set forth in this Resolution, the Note, the Loan Agreement and the Assignment. 13. Covenants with Holders; Enforceability All provisions of the Note and of this Note Resolution and all representations and undertakings by the City in the Loan Agreement are hereby declared to be covenants between the City and the Bank and its successor Holders of the Note and shall be enforceable by the Bank or any Holder in a proceeding brought for that purpose, provided that no such covenant, representation or undertaking shall ever give rise to any pecuniary liability of the City, its employees, officers or agents or constitute a charge against its general credit or taxing powers. 14. Definitions and Interpretation Terms not otherwise defined in this Note ' Resolution but defined in the Loan Agreement shall have the same meanings in this-Note Resolution and shall be interpreted herein as provided therein. Notices may be given as provided in Section 9.01 of the Loan Agreement. In case any provision of this Note Resolution is for any reason illegal or invalid or inoperable, such illegality or invalidity or inoperability shall not affect the remaining provisions of this Note Resolution, which shall be construed or enforced as if such illegal or invalid or inoperable provision were not contained herein. 15. Election Under Internal Revenue .Code. The City hereby elects that the provisions of Section 103 (b)(6)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (the "Code ") and Reg. 1.103 -10(b) (2)(vi) thereunder, permitting the issuance of tax exempt industrial development bonds in amounts up to 10,000,000 under certain conditions, shall apply to the dote, and the Mayor, the City Manager or City Clerk or any of them are authorized to execute and file the appropriate form of election under the Code and Regulations with the Internal Revenue Service. 16. Certifications The Mayor, City ' Manager, City Clerk and other officers of the City are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to Briggs & Morgan, bond counsel, to the Partnership, to the Bank and to counsel for the Partnership and the Bank, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to the Project and the Note and such other affidavits and certificates as may be required 1'3 i c s f ii to show the facts appearing from the books and records in the officers' custody and control or as otherwise known to them; and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, includin g an heretofore furnished, shall constituteY representations of the City as to the truth of all statements contained therein. 17. Limitation on Note Transfers The Note has been issued without registration under state or other securities laws, pursuant to an exemption for such issuance and accordingly the Note may not be assigned or transferred in whole or part, nor may a participation interest in the Note be given pursuant to any participation agreement, except in accordance with an applicable exemption from such registration requirements. amseQ b: h d W ll.iw RK - llll-W10__l!Rl.i Nffli aMEN VE7M. M-1,t -1 w Vg . - zisKKMW_Y A -72 A I IN R4__ Iv w 6 #g; Qk4P, 5F4A -kWoN',iquwaPONlK,M GMEA_i Y< MNO t%.S R-V I, ot u, F T6k-. 77 r ZM, v M., T 3 N5 MVP wXICFA 9 es 0 F RAMS jaj T r7,WLME, NIMR R V px120 2.3g A. I M N-Akl` tA c 6 tpr utid 61, . V,PlIal 4 M 4. Mal50,"'MW Vm OrQk ,z, . J g eQ %'notMWAttuN z 00 R M "k Mi ,,'WYwi N , 0 furNjRZ k p v iEll 0n --i c: .1 'a trp a, or a luci . e u010MIthe, 7 e. .1 w, ACovs,Atp .,a .x 'x ALA- as nerd, 0lowu04. Lj: :9of vm V'?%R WMn XFOR'l Jg W i> tb t: n '03 'nAr,ChtISO '."N .1 t yX0t;A.tUtewAs 3.:seIsWo.pins- t i R vNq ; wREKR3NV ;, -,' ^ EV '% k A m es ; t Whonro-. " I , S_ 661 QAkIMS61 X-F A T 5 - XK. 5im E-fnc 5k fS 7 t7, 1 M ,M-Q tl- ck& w- ,ZRW TL Z, 15vne,;F tzt X'T U; W"Wr r k 1 a" k 15 Mlf; - Wv IM4_1' !,, , OrRAVINow jWMAR4 445yR VV- l Oil K' "I M gg VMZ4 x,, - y A A PsiAsiP%* NV .:,z m -atallONVA Ar V t 4 A'.f -,n K qNX ;?11iA , I y %; , - pmgtARM .7, WV/K WPM- w.Iwtit" w G.5 ,kR AAstr w iNA 5 A SA1121.11;AV? A "o. 'm aP- ';W5MtK,k,Q N t, -1 1, , . . , 'jt,g: A` AR -it,g . V; ',;il ugw K vww A IR e" -ji4M, Wm.M T 1 i Ith ............ it tOY 4 t t Vit - e -,b,elitce Ot 0 ... ., e 't-Ab -et e ng., 0heof - a U, eco _ t:be,,. r bedb I2. U 0. d'. nth inquild ibc Ib reu 0 edat hipents.. m 9- 4 b. b emeah amend P al SQ 040 T,ASwU F ga- _e,W gMIN1, , W, WhOl ",r;f Mm -lz R-65 N 'in 4A A her e owl, ti 7 imp-, r ITO aX athLO 2 nC-e S S 01 'S ccUen e a. x..L..., e. nrepUC' Jun. b e tin A' tit., aL f f7 e A tb Piz t s, UC te, orf t a6de u. -iyl11, b ra erAO f Ut e C e atl ik f a -e2. ,bann g n das, -0iesinnot 0, e r t aL k ',n ap on'spet U nc1w n c iht jo .e - overetbg S tDvon - and t aeUP n. 74 71 jL 6 1 m n. IWAU 0401-1 '- 0 71 R21 N MWX WRM Z44 - MR 1W-1 7:`777 ZAN: 1- Men.441 pm 1,4 anb zu R o lit i: Xeoz_ UZ r aANks, t orl MP 0U, X* AN U t h R t OD . NOW f t 77 7,7 t7, .7 V* a L it ,I-A er tU' Ah1. ft e7 te t SUC axa le-.e ig;: --:` ,ving, xtp P m cz, "j-cYFartZ _-et oItrArike--ettM61 he:er Se u- ....... Q J e 5 ISAR 9 . :` - .1. ': M A. 0-10,be.M b` ti + rSat, DDAi lu V;, . d . As Atg. Tw Ah be.0 ibo t 61 rm1a1PI ,V. ke AN AI Unt tbv,t i'ave77tAib ' A luAxtT 7.7pre, 0 4 b d"PW an Pa b odnme.tits, a d: 5 777,77,+., 4 -14J- tAll z loris t ft owI7Vt q ze Ait a .0ble -s; U I t d V M - 04 tio, e Par,ft:tet Al R qua,V'ajL Ln n thma 0 e P tner Mo,1 It 7 ZT,d &ddit qna- 7.77 OUM e - -.:e rrA.':d'-AAI f` C, " " a, t e.1 P r: j6 enue fie n b6coathe.de ior,..",w 1, a erinination . -,of abil o vi 1 -J,A ;Nibol cett61 WO eA 1, pt san, --erabUl.ovimesUerq1eOndk.' du th , e te+ Re s+.drottor. e"6-rxzed.P q .i s tt4t4 tbe ereof ain,nA, U th M., Y, 7, lon,0P Ok*, 4 e e vl L: naer...,:the 100arl Qezaecome lue ::UeemejxnA R -D f -vn ese e f6'u t-d OanLreement. N tLm eI. e-atigi vo c c U r rp ff 0 Ita an ntig as mf -in dvme :.dLt,.b e L0 Xter o COWet rew b AL "m-46 ProvIlcondit..i-s d "Iti e ne -manner.hV. I t t and ec , ub7., e7 e 0 1 . 8 X ", e ot .I e r 0 OAS e o nfXi e,I b -a" :v_enegre . ne, t s t ntbti0eResIUonD 7.g a g . e,Sa tmejA4, ,e se A -0 M "N e A nd ns Res.61 tlio_n., an A :tb 'Nota6:1Thorovi r s I yga er Lit4 ias7 -1 mo eesodt 0trtlten an A - 'egr.,_,eme fA,P riment',140+rt Or or aarkmen, +--.. ur t to t 7"V t w 6AK . Tszl M , M R' X"2 NN 7- 1' _. 5,11 K 50z.RZ, WFtM K A FI; ZV, 5R,V J ;g-ijy -r4 AWv:L d. RA0iN "'N zzi 7 4g5 4 Z 0NZj g 0 EU P R",4 n IRtAi, Q1.M tr4 ,, 0 x,t A "M M H g 'atz7jr Z?IT 0-4t Mif 4 60-F;4MM 2 4 -pxV4 P P Pt gP v.Kg t F ZIM-, , I e ,Z X-` V 2 V W,POP A trA M v 5. AN A ,abt j IMR, -m- " 11 at Tviv itW7175 -jo Oltti 4 14 nv Y - -ar',OYwrt " rotveUir Z . W-I a a ISO 777, VU X A 26 Te 6- V471 4 F 7t,7 IL-1n00n" r-7-e.e-C. Plvu', t A., WN.'rA..An g'.p Mh n sg mg Avauw rati M-4-Mx ZorAlilt ;;G R MW ME R -zolk. Mmavm7zaA a.Is--ecti NO.% W o , 7R 0 o 4X0 ,Awgp W v 3a S-M Rf 0WP; 7.d eel a thf , t - ' %'LtA. U, 7 77 V' A' Ib pd 4 A7t lklt UICnwnsgoanototw d tdt I i 0 k 1 i1iiv:h 6t J,- P ne12xgl bd I-UL7777:A." inm ggng-rr4u tri,vNP,N-- 7,R 77,,7 i"g J.,t W. g w Pp5xR,,F,,-I,sW-R a -mr-, tfend r-PokoI'Mi"' T. .3.neinneM2cu:r,3 ,.eF, o' ro, *rl tb W110 i 77 0 S ci tb A to"U A-jV, MRa ne PC.n on 4! ih -h ttvtx Mve - e f 7777 bt A" k'-b C to, tht i, .,.,,aU. e dod- nk,e`e.d.`- d Uipe,P4 n It6dbp,.e f d' ze, w h tae e V - ptatot",U p WlNk $Ri AL 0 URI 7 - T, 7", b-e a -.ewoOF.EREIr- MH A i 'If y w a",4nu; 6Ifta. e :Ile c F7 5, 1: i -411.,11--.1.7", 1-11 . . ebcit, max-IL.-I b -dC Lf M, 4swMMqW, f j ft ., b t p C'ib t5 40-fa:-. - 4,:- o M 4 W1 k vt wX qgyqgIz a Nptl osax5,5 -7 ZOO N. R - P , . , , 0 :Qt- ? -9,NR NII MA-L TM v - .s 5 ". X 0,W 4 q qFR gsIva" Z%;w.; " 5 Mng "lipJIm . .. .. . F ,Am EwoL7ne-VVYo4g 7, qg lgig R17 Z 0- rK AX Mo AT, . . . . . . V 1 "0 0 v M 5, Tw ?J Q y M x 4 R 44,4." ' ZVve R":,7— iMQNg; M z -y a W gg g,M w n 4W N N ASNMy -W141, JAU - ot, - -ip,A"I'llvAt AlighIiIN, ifW Z;s, v W - 1 n5l -gk0 Nii Z Kmv VX M,Ma 777— -IN11 R R5 K— DiPikl-ffll.7ii ME—w ' N g PER w o',1- R - -;WITT q 4* c 7 .kn -nLR-, m4a P yi-05gW "S -,-, iNARANORRA x g. WK L WK X - A 5 b SCMOr N K 4"Fif Or IMS f f X p na-p W -Vw` -0` Rgp C qgMV 2M X5. z 4 Nr V 4;M IV-10tNI%tMv4Rd R 7 . 11MA so gg,w g , hr UM -A' TAn-il f INT R v2 8 C' gp -. jgjm q14i 4, W A—gAgg" m ep&,g NRknftq sa nnz,-Ig ozIw112 gpl 4 -11 MA. Wk. R MRoi tl. - ZionV tv MA2 R A k.! tv,FPi, FRg -rW-PION W M1 -INFRIT NN A N ,,F 50-At 2ORvVa. ftDim prR xOF B F 0 A V,Z - Sa -- nc j NXiNOW* z WSEE 4RN O \ Q i MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Code Amendment - -PUD DATE: March 21, 1984 Action by Council: Endorse Mo d if i e d. -,._. . Re j ectec. Date 2., at e The city council, on February 13 initiated a code amendment to requireatleastfourvotesforaapprovalppvalofaplannedunitdevelopmentratherthanthemajorityvotenowrequired, Reason for the Request Council felt that a PUD has as much impact on surrounding s as a rezoni ro ertie and therefore, f P P g e e o re, the same vote as a rezoning should be required. Comments The PUD is a trade -off with a developer. In exchange for one less vote for approval, the developer is tied to a specific site plan, he must meet specificconditions, and he must start •construction within n 121 years. None of this is required for a rezoning. There would be no incentive for a develop to choose a PUD if the council requires at least four votes forapproval. The only exc would ,y p be zero -lot linene housing, which : s best - handl ed w aPUD - because - of the multiple variances needed. A PUD is useful to the city, where the council may want to control the t operation of a particular type ormethodofoPp1ruse. The St. Paul Business Center, at I -35E and Roselawn Avenue, is a good example. This was a controversial ro'ectPJadjacenttoaresidentialneighborhood. The PUD allowed us to negotiateotiate an agreement limiting the . types of uses, hours of operation, requirements for noise control and use of the sewer. Recommenda . Make no change. If council decides to require at least four votes for approval, an ordinance is enclosed. ID JW A + +' WI u I I Ia11%.0 I ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 36- 442(x) RELATING TO APPROVAL OF A PUD The Maplewood City Council hereby ordains as follows: S - ection 1. Section 36- 442(a) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances is hereby amended to read as follows (addition underlined) : Sec.36.442 Granting; vote of council; conditions; automatic periodic review; new conditions upon review. a) The city council may grant a' conditional use permit by . a majority vote except that a fanned unit develo ment may only be approved b a T t 4 N A^ %, r r% 4- A o% -F -1 11 w 4. w .- raw L- u- Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after its passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Council this day of , 1984. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Ayes - Nays - D. Code Amendment: PUD Secretary Olson said the city council initiated a code amendment torequiredatleastfourvotesforapprovalofaplannedunit -devel oratherthanthe. majorityt vote prnent, y e now required. Staff recommends no actionbetakenonthisitem. The commission indicated that there is more control on a developmentwhenitfollowsthePUDconcept. If the voting requirements arSq e changedtothesameasarezoningthereisnoincentivetousethePUDconceptandthecitycannotapplyasmanycontrolstoadevelopmentundera zone change, t f' Commissionerssioner Fischer moved the l anp Wina commission recommend that thecouncilnot. change the number of votes requiredred to approve a Pqppe UD. Commissioner seconded. Ayes--CommissionerE11ofsonFischer s Axdahl , BarrettPellish, Robens, Si gmundi k, S1 etten, Whitcomb. t d MEMORANDUM Action by Counc-1 Endorse TO: City Manager Nodifi -ed. FROM: Director of Community Development Rejeet SUBJECT: Code Amendment (LBC District) Date DATE: April 12, 1984 Request Amend the code to allow office, clinic and day care center uses in an LBC, limited business commercial zone without council approval. Reason for the Request Requiring council approval of offices in an LBC zone is an unnecessary delay for developers and is an inefficient use of staff, planning commission and council time. The LBC zone is specifically for offices and similar uses. The design and site plan are reviewed by the commun ty design review board. Ordinances govern setback and screening from residential areas. There is no other reason for council review. Recommendation Approval of the enclosed ordinance allowing offices, clinics and day care centers in the LBC zone, jW attachments: 1. LBC d 2. Ordinance amendment F Sec. 36 -154. LBC Limited Business Commercial District. a) Generally. The LBC Limited Business Commercial Distri ciisherebyestablishedandmaybeauthorizedbythecouncilIMthoselocationswherearegularBCBusinessCommercialDis-strictabutsaresidentialdistrict, the intent of this rovision beingtomakepossibleamodifiedcomet P commercial area in the nature of abufferzonewhereintheuses, subject to prior council aprof PP al,will be limited to professional offices and such other similar usesasthecouncilmaydetermine. The proposed plan of use in ansuchLBCLimitedBusinessCommercialdistrictctshallbesubmit- ted to the council for final determination and approval. b) Setback from property zoned residential 'The building shallhaveminimumsideandrearyardsetbacksoftwenty0feey( tandaminimumfrontyardsetbackofthirty (30) feet. These minimum required setbacks shall be increased not toexceedseventy -five (75) feet, subject to the most restrictive of the following requirements: 1) Building height- The building setbacks shall be increase two d 2) feet for each one foot the building exceeds twenty-five (25) feet in height. 2) Exterior wall area: where an exterior wall zoned r 1 faces a reslden-tiall3' property, the wall setback shall be increasedfive (5) feet for each one thousand (1 square feet, orPartthereof, in excess of two thousand ( - 3.,10-19-67; square feet.Code 1965, § 907.010; Ord. No. 232, § Ord. No.256, 11- 20 -69; Ord. No. 402, § 1, 8- 12 -76; Ord. N11- 22 -82) o. 529, § 6, Attachment.1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ALLOWING OFFICES, CLINICS AND DAY CARE CENTERS AS PERMITTED USES IN THE LBC ZONE a THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): Section 1. Section 36 -154. LBC LIMITED BUSINESS COMMERCIAL DISTRICT is hereby amended to read as follows: a Geeray: -- The LBE Lted Bus }eels- EBerEa 8strEt s - hereby- estab shed -arie- gay- be- authered -by- the- Eeurie -ri these- leeat4ens- where -a- regular- BE- Bus4Ress- EeFaffiere4al- 94stret abets a- resident4al- d4str4et the 4riterit ef - th4s- prev4s}eri be4Rg- te- Riake- pens}ble- a- Faed}f4ed- eeRiFflere4al -area - the - nature ef- a- buffer- zeRe- where4R- the - uses;- subjeet- te- pr4er- eeuRe41 appreval will- be- TiRited- te- prefess4erial- eff4ees- arid -such -ether s4Hi4lar- uses -as- the- eeume41- day- deterf4rie: The- prepesed -plan of - use -4ri- any- sue h- L9E- 644ted- Business- EelRRiere *al44 str4et shall -be -subs} tied - the- eeume4l- fer- f4Ral- determriat4eri -arid apprea- a) Permitted uses: offices, clinics and day care centers Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publ i cati on. Passed by the Maplewoodewood City Council this day of , 1984. Mayor Attest: City Clerk ayes-- nays-- Attachment 2 I D. Code Amendment: LBC District 16 _ ZV Secretary Olson said the ro osalPP is to amend the code to a1low office c1anddaycarecenterusesinan - LBC 1 imi ni c council approval , ted business commercial zone without Commissioner Fischer-moved the planning commission recommend the cicouncilapprovetheordinanceallowingoffices, clin day care centersandsimilarusesintheLBCzone, Commissioner Hejny seconded Ayes - - Commissioners Axdahl,Fischer, Hejny, Larson, Pel l i sh R •obens, S gmund k, S1 etten, Whi tcomb T r. MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City 5ngineer SUBJECT: Holloway Avenue Improvement Assessment Calculations Project No. 81 -12 DATE: May 7, 1984 Action by Counn-i1: Endorsed Mod i ed—._ Rejected--- Date The assessment rates for the above— referenced project is herewith provided for the city council's review. The rates have been calculated in accordance with the cost sharing joint agreement between Maplewood, North St. Paul and Ramsey County and in accordance with current city assessment policy. Assessments are proposed to be levied against all benefited properties the project's service area. The methods proposed for financing the improvements consist of municipal state aid funding and special assessments. Actual construction costs were used in determining the total cost of the project since the project is essentially complete. Indirect costs incurred to date for engineering, legal and fiscal costs and projectvnanagement were added to the construction cost to'determine the total project cost. The cost sharing joint agreement outlined the breakdown of costs between Maplewood, North St. Paul and Ramsey County. ?4.aplewood's total cost for this project was calculated to be $465,998.29. The following table sumari zes project costs and establishes the proposed assessment rates, cost recovery from assessments, and municipal state aid funding (MSAS): ASSESSMENT RATES TOTAL $465., 998.21 Description Street Water services Sanitary sewer services Sanitary sewer Storm sewer 274 $191, 254.94 COMPARISON OF ASSESSMENT RATES Feasibility Study Proposed Rates 35,00/FF 3 5.00 /F F 610.00/EA 671.00 /EA 905.00 /EA 729.00/EA 24.00 /F F 28.8O/FF 0.05 /SF 0.05 /SF The State of Minnesota has determined that $320,094.45 of MSAS funds are eligible for funding of this project. The proposed cost recovery yields an obi i gati of 191,.2 of MSAS funds to this project leaving an excess of MSAS funds of 1.28, 8399 51 Therefore, we are requesting council consideration forthe attached two resolutions, ordering preparation of the assessment roll s; and ordering an assessment roll hearing. Est.Asmt.Asmt.Cost MSAS Description Cost Unit Rate Recovery Funds Street 205.006.66 4,131.5 FF 35.00/FF 144 60 Water Serv.4, 697.00 7.0 EA 671.00 /EA 4, 697.00 0400 San. Serv,4, 374.00 6.0 EA 729.00/EA 4, 374.00 0.00 San, Sewer 15, 955.20 554.0 FF 28.8O/FF 15, 955.20 0.00 Storm Sewer Ramsey Co.)78,763.82 78,7630 0.00 Maplewood)157, 201.53 527 015, 0 SF O.O5/SF 26, 350.75 130,850. 78 TOTAL $465., 998.21 Description Street Water services Sanitary sewer services Sanitary sewer Storm sewer 274 $191, 254.94 COMPARISON OF ASSESSMENT RATES Feasibility Study Proposed Rates 35,00/FF 3 5.00 /F F 610.00/EA 671.00 /EA 905.00 /EA 729.00/EA 24.00 /F F 28.8O/FF 0.05 /SF 0.05 /SF The State of Minnesota has determined that $320,094.45 of MSAS funds are eligible for funding of this project. The proposed cost recovery yields an obi i gati of 191,.2 of MSAS funds to this project leaving an excess of MSAS funds of 1.28, 8399 51 Therefore, we are requesting council consideration forthe attached two resolutions, ordering preparation of the assessment roll s; and ordering an assessment roll hearing. RESOLUTION ORDERING ASSESSMENT .ROLL HEARING WHEREAS, the Clerk and the Engineer will, at- the direction of the Council, prepare an assessment roll for the. construction of Holloway Avenue Improvement, Project No. 81 -12, and the said assessment roll w i l l be on f i l e in the office of the City Clerk; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 110 A hearing shall be held on the 11th day of June, 1984, at the City Hall at 7 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 20 The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners of all property affected by said assessment. 3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time, and place of hearing, the general nature of the improve ment, the area proposed to be assessed, that the proposed . assessment roll is on f i l e with the Clerk, and that written or oral objections will be considered. a\ i r HI- >-I.- MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Public Works Director SUBJECT: County State —Aid Designation DATE: May 7, 1984 Action hr Endors e d Modified. - Rejected Date The City and Ramsey County have for some time discussed changing juris— diction of County Road D and Bellaire Avenue. It is proposed that Maplewood, Vandnais Heights and White Bear Township take over respons— ibility for County Road D and Bellaire Avenue. In return Ramsey County would take responsibility for Beam Avenue, Lydia Avenue and a connection between County Road D and Beam Avenue west of T.H. 61. The attached letter goes into detail about the proposal. 0 It is recommended the City Council adopt the attached resolution requesting jurisdictional changes. March 9, 1984 Ramsey County DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 167 Courthouse St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 612) 298 -4127 Mr, John Greavu, Mayor City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 County State Aid Highway Designation KENNETH E. WELTZIN Director and County Engineer PHYLLIS F. SPECKER Administrative Assistant A county state aid highway (CSAH) designation is currently placed on County Road D CSAH 19) and on Bellaire Avenue (CSAH 70). Ramsey County proposes to remove the designations from County Road D from .357 miles west of T.H. 61 to Bellaire Avenue (2.777 miles) and from Bellaire Avenue from Lydia Avenue to County Road D 24 miles). The County plans to assign CSAH designations to a new alignment of County Road D proposed CSAH 19) from .35.7 miles west of T.H. 61 to Beam Avenue (.589 miles), to Beam Avenue (proposed CSAH 19) from 080 miles west of T.H. 61 to White Bear, Avenue (1.516 miles) and to Lydia Avenue (proposed CSAH 19) from White Bear Avenue to Bellaire Avenue (1.124 miles). The proposed changes are illustrated on the attached map. Discussion of Designation to be Removed Designation of County Road D as a county state. aid highway in Vadnais Heights, Maplewood and White Bear Township was made in anticipation of the construction of a major east -west routing in the portion of Ramsey County which would connect T, H. 61 and T.H. 120. Development has altered the role of County Road D so that it will not serve the transportation purpose perceived when the designation was made. Geometric changes interrupt the continuity of the. route. - At the intersection of County Road D and T.H. 61 only right turns are permitted from County Road D. East of T.H. 61 County Road D is closed at the bridge which carries Burlington Northern traffic over the road. The trips made on the route are, therefore, primarily local and short -. r e in nature. The Minnesota Department of Transportation plans to construct an interchange providing full directional access at T.H. 61 and I --694. The distance between the south I -694 ramps and County Road D, as planned in preliminary layouts for the interchange, will be less than standard. Closing the access to T.H. 61 from the west at County Road D could be expected to improve safety. For these reasons, County Road D and Bellaire Avenue no longer meet county state aid highway criteria and are recommended for removal from the system. Ik Mr. Greavu March 9, 1984 Page 2 of 2 Discussion of to be Added The proposed construction of .589 miles of County Road D from .357 miles west of YT.H. 61 south to Beam Avenue b Ramsey County with city cooperation would facilitate development west of T.H. 61. County Road D Beam Avenue - white Bear Avenue - Lydia Avenue wool p Pdprovidetransportation continuity between the area west of T.H. 61 to T.H. 120, proposedosed east -west county state aid highway designation would be P placed on those routes which are currently used more heavily than those from which the designation would be removed4b Procedure for Designation C The procedure for accomplishing removal of CSAH designation and redesignation of roads requires municipal concurrence in the action. Ramsey County requests approval by the Maplewood City Council of removing the CSAH designation from: County Road D (CSAH 19) from .357 miles west of T.H, 61 to Bellaire Avenue 2.777 miles); and Bellaire Avenue (CSAH 70) from County Road D to Lydia Avenue (0.24 miles). These roads would be transferred from county to city jurisdiction. Ramsey County requests approval by the Maplewood City Council of. adding CSAH designations to: County Road D (proposed CSAH 19, a new alignment) from .357 miles west of T.H. 61 to Beam Avenue (0.589 miles); and Beam Avenue (proposed CSAH 19) from .080 miles west of T.H. 61 to White Bear Avenue (1.516 miles); and Lydia Avenue (proposed CSAH 19) from White Bear Avenue to Bellaire Avenue 1.124 miles). The transfer of CSAH designation request will be considered by the Board of Ramsey County Commissioners and forwarded to the District State Aid Engineer of the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn /DOT) for his consideration. A resolution approving these changes is requested of Maplewood. A sample is attached. Phase contact Paul Kirkwold, Traffic and Planning Engineer, at 484 -9104 if you have questions. Kenneth E. Weltzin, P.E. Director and County Engineer KD:m encl: m ap i VADMAIS HEIGHTS WHITE BEAR SAKE x - 694 owo D d W oM,YN hyl. 1 MAftJtN400O O RLY01A AMA• MALI ° 4107 MMMMMMff-- I Jul 1 1 ro, —o" r t E,cisriNG C31.N ROUTE SCgI_4: I" = 1000' tNTERb+CTIo Mwr F IcI1'i wN Ba i CLOG l MAPLE %AMD 8 RAM +, AV 4 SCALS . I" = 200' TSOMKIZW 4e AMPLER 3+ 3 7xN K22 W U L ut N L SCALS . I" = 200' h DRAFT RESOLUTION CITY OF MAPLEWOOD WHEREAS, Ramsey County proposes to locate and establish as County State Aid Highways the roads hereinafter described within the City of Maplewood: County Road D (proposed CSAH 19) from .357 miles west of T.H. 61 to Beam Avenue (.589 miles); Beam Avenue (proposed CSAH 19) from .080 miles west of T.H. 61 to White Bear Avenue (1.516 miles); and Lydia Avenue (proposed CSAH 19) from White Bear Avenue to Bellaire Avenue (1.124 miles); Now, Therefore, Be It RESOLVED by the City Council of Maplewood that said designations are approved, subject to approval by the Board of Ramsey County Commissioners and the Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota. r WHEREAS, Ramsey County proposes to revoke the County State Aid Highway designations within the Cities of Vadnais Heights and Maplewood and Town of White Bear of the following roads: Count y Road D from .357 miles west of T.H. 61 to Bellaire Avenue (2.777) miles; and Bellaire Avenue from Lydia Avenue to County Road D (.24 miles); Now, Therefore, Be It RESOLVED by the City Council of Maplewood that these roads are hereby revoked as County State Aid Highways of Ramsey County subject to the approval of the Board of Ramsey County Commissioners and the Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota; and Be It Further RESOLVED that these roads will be transferred to the jurisdictions of Maplewood, Vadnais Heights and White Bear; and Be It Further RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized to forward two certified copies of this resolution to the Public Works Director of Ramsey County who will submit them to the Board of Ramsey County Commissioners and Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota for his consideration. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Mayor Date Two certified copies required. f T0: FROM: SUBJECT: z DATE: Action by Council: MEMORANDUM Endorsed. Modified- Rejected City Manager Date L Director of Community Development _ - Access to 1773 -71 Burr Street and the City Lift Station, May 3, 1984 Council, on April 23rd, tabled the vacation of Burr Street and RipleyAvenueuntilstaffcouldreportonaccessto1773 -71 Burr Street and the city lift station.' There is a dirt road from Bradley Street that has been used as access to these sites for at least 20 years. This road crosses private property. The city attorney's office i s of the opi ni on that thi s road i s public because of the 1 ength of time it has been used. Even if it were not public, access to the north over Burr Street would not be feasible because of the steep grades. Burr Street and Ripley Avenue should be vacated as recommended. iw r 4 . e. MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: PROJECT: DATE: City Manager Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner Street and Alley Vacations Ripley Avenue, Burr Street and Adjacent Alley Richard and Gloria Jean LeFebvre. Single Dwelling -_ April 11, 1984 SUMMARY Re uest 1. Vacate the alley in block three, Kings Addition to the City of St. Paul. 2. Vacate the 140 -foot portion of Burr Street lying directly south of Ripley Avenue, 3. Vacate Ripley Avenue lying between Burr and Bradley Streets-. 4. Vacate Ripley Avenue between DeSoto and Burr Streets (staff's proposal). Proposed Land Use 1. Refer to the applicant's letter on page 10. 2. The applicant is proposing to build his house closer to Ripley Avenue and Burr Street than code allows, in order to save a mature oak tree. The proposed dwelling would be twelve feet from both right -of -way lines rather than the thirty feet code requires. Refer to the map on page 90 CONCLUSION rnmmontc Road construction of Ripley Avenue and Burr Street is infeasible because of the steep grade. The alley need not be retained as right -of -way either s.i nce Maplewood does not develop alleys. The only means of access to 1781 Burr Street is over an existing driveway on Ripley Avenue. Refer to the map on page 6. The applicant proposes to allow Norval Henni ngs, the owner of 1781 Burr Street, to continue using this driveway after the vacation. A driveway easement should be recorded to assure that this access would be continued. be two tax - forfeit lots shown on page 2 are part of the Housing and Redevelop- QLO:nt Authority's "tax - forfeit lands program." The goal of this program is to eliminate tax - forfeit properties by combining them with adjacent developed property. The applicant and Norval Hennings have both expressed an interest in obtaining these lots. The combination of these lots with adjacent property would be their best use, since they cannot otherwise be accessd4 by a public street. That portion of Ripley Avenue adjacent to DeSoto Street w i l l not be needed for roadway purposes. The Area Development Concept on page 8 shows a street inter secti ng DeSoto Street which would serve the vacant land north of Ripley Avenue. BACKGROUND Site Description 1. Amount of right -of -way proposed to be vacated: Ripley avenue - 33 by 573.4 feet Burr Street - 66 by 140 feet Alley - 20 by 261.4 feet i 7 2. Existing Land Use: undeveloped except for Ripley Avenue which has power Obles and a dirt driveway running from Bradley Street to Burr Street. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: a single dwelling fronting on Desoto Street and undeveloped land planned RL, low density residential and zoned F, farm residential. Southerly: Single dwellings and undeveloped property planned RL and zoned R -1, single dwelling residential. There is also an east -west dirt road which provides access to the city's l i f t station, south of Kingston Street, and the homes to the west of Burr Street. Westerly: single dwellings Easterly: Bradley Street and single dwellings Past Actions 4- 11 -83: Council approved the vacation of the alley in block five, except for the portions of the alley adjacent to lots six and seven because of a dwelling overlapping the a 1 l ey'. 7- 29 -83: The applicant purchased block three of Kings Addition to the City of St. Paul which was previously tax forfeit property. Parks 3-19-84: The city's park system plan proposes a park directly north of Ripley Avenue. The park and recreation commission decided that the park was not needed and that Ripley Avenue., therefore, was not needed.for access to the park. DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS r . riannina - 1, Land use plan designation: RL 2, Zoning: R -1 3, Section 412.851 of the State Statutes allows a city to vacate right -of -way when council makes a finding that it would be in the public interest. 3 The vacation of Ripley Avenue between Desoto and Burr Streets should be conditioned on dedication of right -of -way from Desoto Street to the Torgerson property. Recommendation I. A. Adoption of the resolution on page 12 vacating Ripley Avenue between Burr Street; a 140 foot piece of Burr Street lying directly;. south of Ripley Avenue; and the alley in block three, Kings Addition: to the City of St. Paul. Approval is based on the findings that: 1. Construction of these rights -of -way for roadway purposes is in- feasible, 2. It would be in the public interest. B. Approval is subject to: 1. Retaining utility easements over Ripley Avenue, the alley and Burr Street. (South of the north line of the alley.) 2. The applicant granting the owner of 1781 Burr Street a perpetual driveway easement over Ripley Avenue lying between Burr Street and Bradley Street and over that portion of Burr Street right -of -way west of the northerly 20 feet of lot six, block three (refer to the map on page 7.) II. A. Adoption of the resolution on page 14 vacating Ripley Avenue between DeSoto Street and Burr Street, based on the findings that: 1. Construction of Ripley Avenue as a roadway is unnecessary since access to the adjacent vacant land will most likely be provided farther north along DeSoto Street. 2. It would be in the public interest. B. Approval is subject to: 1. Dedication of right -of -way farther to the north which would connect the vacant land north of Ripley Avenue to DeSoto Street. 2. The retention of a utility easement over the right -of -way. Majority vote needed for approval Four- fifths vote needed for approval S 4. Section 36 -70 of the zoning code requires a dwelling to be setback at least thirty feet from street right -of -way. Public Works 1. Due to the extreme grade along Ripley Avenue and Burr Street, there is no need to retain these rights -of -way for roadway purposes. z The alley is not needed for right -of -way. 3. An - easement should be retained over Ripley Avenue since this right -of -way may be needed in the future for the installation of utilities. Citizen Comments Mr. Norval Hennings of 1781 Burr Street has the following concerns: 1. If Ripley Avenue is vacated his driveway access could be cut off. The applicant, however, has indicated that Mr. Henning could continue using the driveway. 2. 'If Ripley Avenue and Burr Street were vacated, potential access would be cut off to the two tax - forfeit lots south of his lot. n ._.. _ _ _ ...__ 1. Review by the planning commission 2. Public hearing and decision by the city council--three votes are required for approval. jW attachments: 1. Location map 2. Property line map 3. Driveway easement map 4. Area development concept map 5. Site plan 6. Applicant's letter 7. Petition 8. Resolution - -alley and street vacation k Resolution -- Ripley Avenue 4 loorloc 0 It Q 117. j F A L A R V I K I N G LITTLE 'CANADA w 5E lAURIERD.3 0 Ir UNT 49 z CO ROAD I .:BU RKE AV. ELDRIDGE oc H 21! E AV. Sand SEL7M ONT BELMONT Lake 4INANAVE.58 SKILLMAN CKILLMANAVE, OD LA. 0- wNONAVEIrytp < z Thff. VERNON AVE RNOwDOAVE. =9)qc I z w E 4L 49 0- w 602tROSELAWNAVE. w cc 0 26I,-- L - ----- z0 ISELL)NOOD AV. wLWOODAVE. BELL li7ioil j I H ISUMMER AVE.dd z 41 usFEWTON_ AVEall. 0z 0J PLEY VE 2 Q* o 10 w 0 I- JKINGS Z KING l$T 0 N AVE. Rouno 0 AVE. LO 0 w 4D 30D-0 9 55 57 ST. PAUL PROPOSED PARK 3 RECOMMENDED FOR DELETION , v =BY PARKS COMM, I I t PROPOSED -SED HOLDING POND 1790 _ MAPLEWOOD DRAINAGE PLAN Z A4,c PAVED ST REST 70, - t J f i i 11800 54 .. _. »!Dan- lw- t LJ e uj v woopoo — j r ` " - 0 .00 • so PAVED STREET i = Z kn IT IFT 4 1 T I ON — — — - — -- --- - 4L ll cm lk Ld J v r " t _ ?Q r r C ter Q wigbv to 9 lie PROPERTY LINE /'ZONING MAP DIRT DRIVEWAY PAVED DRIVEWAY PROPOSED VACATION Attach 4 4 T tai :P t a • f • 1 ' t r DRIVEWAY EASEME 5 11 t4:.7s a94 5 CD PED STVEET y TAX FORFEIT ti.:.f.. .::: _ AV • ' n LOTS 61, & -. - J F , ' 1? tit. BV.' 1/? 0 ' W701 ! , - Z71i,:- moo 54 ZB 0-1.- 77 7 • 177177 O ..._. 25 17 J Ao317 g 6 w 20 .ate q 40 tic 1 e .-.; t• -:, - • . 1.4 27 `120 , 120.5 PAVED - ST RE ET A %%Il wa LIFT STATION 27 • —9 • ` 7 ? • : a rl w CL Cb ow UJ r-1 L 1 -2 06 Ile a 3 ..t RJ.i 1 rr c-_ . T i. DRIVEWAY EASEMENT TO BE GRANTED FOR ACCESS TO 1781 BURR STREET 7 Attachment 3 i j 94110 ROSELAWN AVE. 0 9 1 4 16.7 . 0 xx . 411 grtI av 973.1 875.0 x IIIIIIIIIIIIIA x • 889.0 Q'i 1.5 e0I 000- 11 094 x8s 9 joll— 03.0 — --- ---\, 9.5 901 1 Woter 859.5 861.5 f , , 875 • Ilw5 859.0 w861. l RIPLEY AVEr low* X867.0 914.57.0 X 7-.-JE:39NN _J ALLEY fC) 856.5 Cr D x 8 78tgn 11111111 lill a ..Joe -00/U51 5 .01 1 10000' 00 ! l m . AREA DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT I - PROPOSED VACATIONS Attachment 4 I WO r h ///7 e O S..E. 4 of S. *W. ,4 Of 7 T . - 9 X Z 2 653. S6_ -- - TO It '. corr. P r of W. VX fn H Corner anc'er brush pile. 260. 72 IL C 6 40 661 large cottonwood 30 ft. setback .line {// •• i• . r . a .rte r .... ....r i r r 30 ft• large oaksetbacklineg 1 66 -71 l 060• iI o 060 71 ; ! i a ti 0 7/ 66 1 7 8 ROA D t'v A Y 60- 40 40- Z60- 70 A A4 Z60- 70 A A4 i . rte, ,.,,; , ,, Attachment 6 iz- i t-.. r - -,c.,. j : :;,, • c -_L . ^r`.. Cam.,,, C C.A tC Cd C 49; f.:: ,J. ,._ Cam' - LI , , I f. :. C— Q., oC't AC')-' t -- '_ X •, I CL L4-,A tz- i . rte, ,.,,; , ,, Attachment 6 PUBLIC VACATION PETITION We, the undersigned, bei na a majority of the owners of land abutting on die (street), alley), or. (public easement) described as: do hereby petition the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, to vacate the above described area. Name Signature (Please print or type) Abstractor's List No. AJ:1 3 i 1 • r ( 4 r Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota 'was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the 23rd day of April , 1984 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Richard and Gloria Jean LeFebvre initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following described real property, all in section 17, township 29, range 22: 1. The alley in block three, Kings Addition to the City of St. Paul. 2. Ripley Avenue lying between the westerly al i gnment of Burr Street and Bradley Street. 3. That portion of Burr Street as measured from the southerly alignment of the alley in block .three, Kings Addition to the City of St. Paul northerly to Ripley Avenue. WHEREAS, the following adjacent properties are affected: 1. Block three, Kings Addition to the City of St. Paul. 2. Lots one through four of block five, Kings Addition to the City of St. Paul. 3. Subject to streets and easements and except the west 163 feet lying south of the north 30 feet and except the east 163 feet of the west 489 feet of the south 85 feet of the north 455 feet of the southwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of section 17, township 29, range 22. unplatted lands. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. This vacation was initiated by Richard and Gloria Jean LeFebvre on February 22, 1984; 2. A majority of the owners of property abutting said alley and streets have signed a petition for thi s vacation; 3. This vacation was reviewed by the planning commission on April 16, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that this vacation be 4 The. city council held a public hearing on April 23, 1984 to consider this vacation. Notice thereof was published: and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were I given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above describedbed streets -and al 1 ey, public interest in the property will accrue to the following described abutting properties: 12 Attachment 8 NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood City Council that it is in the best interest to grant the above - described vacation on the basis of the following findings of fact: _ 1. Construction of these rights -of -way for roadway purposes is easi bl e. vr a 2. - It would be in the public interest. This vacation is subject to retention of utility easements over Ripley Avenue, the alley and Burr Street (south of the north l i n e of said alley). Adopted this 23rd day of April, 1984. Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) 1. I the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the 23rd day of April, 1984, with the original on file in my office and the same. is a - full , true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to vacation of these streets and alley. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this. day of , 1984, City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota ' was duly .called and held in the council chambers in said city on the 23rd day of April, 1984 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent:_ WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following described real property: Ripley Avenue between DeSoto Street and Burr Street in section 17, township 29, range 22. WHEREAS the following adjacent properties are affected: 1. Subject to streets and easements and except the north 495 feet of the west 163 feet of the southwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of section 17, township 29, range 22. Unplatted lands. 2. Lots one and five, block five, Kings Addition to the City of St. Paul. 3. Subject to streets and easements and except the west 163 feet lying south of the north 30 feet and except the east 163 feet of the west 489 feet of the south 85 feet of the north 455 feet of the southwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of section 17, township 29, range 22. Unplatted lands. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. This vacation was initiated by the City of Maplewood on February 22, 1984; 2. This vacation was reviewed by the planning commission on April 16, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that this vacation be 3. The city council held a public hearing on April 23, 1984 to cons i der . thi s vacation. Notice thereof was publ i shed and mai i ed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above described street, public interest in the property will accrue to the following described abutting properties. i- NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood City Council that it is in the public interest to grant the above-described vacation on the basis of the following findings of fact: T r 1. The construction of Ripley Avenue as a roadway is unnecessary since access to the adjacent vacant land will most likely be provided farther north along DeSoto Street. 2. It would be in the public interest. 1 n J, This vacation is subject to the retention of a utility easement over the right -of -way. Adopted this 23rd day of April , 19840 Seconded by Ayes- - s i STATE OF MINNESOTA } COUNTY OF RAMSEY } SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD } I, the undersigned, being the duly_ qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the 23rd day of April, 1984 with the original on f i le in my office and the same i s a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to vacation of this street. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1984. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota i 1s Ripley Avenue and Burr Street F , Be Streets and Alley Vacation. to vacate the alley in blockock three. Secretary Olson said the proposal is . of St. Paul, vacate 140 foot portion of Burr Kings Additionon to the city - between Burr south of Ripleye Avenue. vacate Ripley lyingng betty Street lying s p y and Bradley Streets and vacate Ripley Avenue between Desoto and Burr Streets. 4 4 -16 -84 z T--± Richard LeFebvre, 1358 Lar, enteur sad they have purchased all twelveofthelotsandtheywouldliketobuildasingledwelling r g ing on lots 5and6. The topogaphy of the land i s such that it is unfeasible thatthestreetswouldbeextended. They would like to move the house closer .to both streets. The access would be the same driveway that 1781 uses.He said lots 1 through 3 are not buildable because the have= athem. The ap y pond on pp nt suggested the city change to us = ing t1te:a11ettothe - yaccesstogpumpingstationratherthancuttingacr`ss theirlots. Secretary Olson said the city would have to look •at it to see f therewouldbeaproblemwithgrade The applicant indicated there would be no roblp em with giving the owner at 1781 a easement to his property. Commissioner Hejny moved the lannin commissionp on forward the folio.resol_ut i on to the counci 1: WHEREAS, Richard and Gloria Jean LeFebvre initiated r 'p oceedngs to .vacatethepublicinterestinthefollowingrealrorSection17townPpety, all i n ship 29, range 22: 1 The alley in block three, Kings Addition to the City of St. Paul., 2. Ripley Avenyue lying between the wester 'westerl alignment of Burr Street..and Bradley Street, 3. That portion of Burr Street as measured from the southerly alignmentofthealleyinblockthree, Kings addition to the Cit of St. PaulnortherlytoRipleyAvenue. WHEREAS, the following adjacent properties are affected: 1. Block three, Kings Addition to the City of St. Pul 2 . Lots one through four of block five, Kings Addition t 'St. Paul o the City of 3. Subject to streets and easements and exce t the west i n sou h P t 163 feet1ygtofthenorth30feetandexcepttheeast163feetof thewest489feetofthesouth85feetofthenorth455feetoftheSouth-west 1/4 of the Northeast 1 /4 of the Southwest 1/4 'of section 17township29. range 22, unplatted lands. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above -describeddescribed streets and alley, publict'nterest in the property w i l l accrue to the following descr ' ro be abutt ngvPerties. P NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED b t = -y e Maplewood Planninging Comma ssi on that i tisinthebestinteresttogranttheabove- described vacati ont.on thebasisofthefollowingfindings -of -fact: 5 4 -16 -84 1. Construction of these rights -of -way for roadway purposes is i n- feasible. 2. It would be -in the public interest. Thi vacation is subject to: 1. Retaining utility easements over Ripley Avenue, the ally and Burr Street (south of north line of alley), 2. The applicant granting the owner of 1781 Burr Street a perpetual driveway easement over Ripley Avenue lying between Burr Street and Bradley Street and over that portion of Burr Street right -of -way west of the northerly 20 feet of lot six, block three of Kings Addition to the City of St. Paul. Commissioner Robens seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl, Fischer, He j ny, Larson, Pel l i sh, Robens, Si gmu nd i k, S1 etten, Whitcomb The commission questioned if the balance of the proposed vacations should wait until after the plat to the north is f i nal ed. This may help in obtaining the required access for the plat to the north. Commissioner Pellish mov the olanninQ commission recommend the counci con thi as another meth of securin 60 foot access between 17.40 and- 1.822_DeSo-tp for the Twin Oaks lat.P Commi Wh coinb - seconded Ayes--Commissioners A xdahl, Fischer, He jny, Larson, Pel i i sh, Robens, Si gmundi k, S1 etten, Whitcomb Took ' MEMORANDUM To: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: City Manager City Engineer Water Main Petition, McClelland St. May 7, 1984 Action by Couno Endorsed-_.- Modified _._.. Rej ected.,.... Date ... The attached petition is incomplete. The sponsor, however, requests the city council to consider installation of water main in McClelland St. north of Brookvi ew Drive as quickly as possible. Apparently their well has failed. The attached map shows this water system in the neighborhood. If improvements are considered, water main installation on McClelland, Hudson and Ferndale would be recommended. It is recommended the city council authorize a feasibility study to investigate the cost and engineering feasibility of water main on McClelland, Hudson and Ferndal mb undersigned, do hereby petition the Council of the City pofMewood to : f and that . the said improvement be undertaken by the Village 'Counci in accordance with the prove si ons of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter -429; and that the cost thereof be assessed agai nst benefi tted property as provided by said Chapter 429, OWNER STREET ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT- DATE or 6 1 .-.l \.A L-- +.r.. f r 1. i IA I-Q01 M r 1 • , ! V Le e- Vclu-,- eck Ln f3 lock V l lop n I certify that I have witnessed the above signatures, and the proposed improvements were discussed with the signers. DATE) ' PE T N SPONSOR 3bR 4 A N i/2 I -28 -2< 1 e~ ...> " •.. s - - ` rte; { — r r1 a QD 0 - ' -- • -- ESM PROPOSED WATERMAIN 3..31' . t` •' i "' ti_ ..... _ -._ _ _ . }. w r , ' y . .. Y _ _ ._ 4 _ "!". ; I . t a ' tsl ._ . _ a « Cr- v •, - •! -sue 4 It OG r r i 1 o MAYER R. MAYER Q M a y _ sal .._ ' t !: - +_ - • ; _ ` •. _ cot - M -_.._ • • , mil 1 cn CD JAM ES p Y r • 1. . •,J .. • i ' r a .ems . - _ ... Y •. r _ _ cl wi iwoo i t } t J J , N = Q J z loom i Z. ... Oia _ . = 43: UPPER _ AFTON RD x — — — -- ---- -- — g — . E1 + s s NI/2 1-28 MEMORANDUM t TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: City Manager Associate Planner--Johnson Detachment and Annexation 2091 Belmont Lane Donald Peterson and City Staff Donald Peterson Eldridge Court Preliminary Plat May 1, 1984 SUMMARY Request Z Action-by Council: Endorse Modified... Rejected. Date Authorize thi property to be detached from Maplewood and annexed to North St. Paul. Reason for the Request 1. The property owner has asked to subdivide a piece of Maplewood property that cannot be directl accessed from Maplewood (page 5) . Consequentl the provision of emergency vehicle services and snow plowing would be cumbersome. 2. North St. Paul w i l l be building and assessing the costs for the proposed Eldridge Court cul-de- and utilities (see page 6) when they construct Ariel Street, Eldridge and Burke Avenues this summer (see page 5). Assessment of costs to the applicant's property would require Maplewood council approval if the property is to remain in Maplewood. 3. The owner and the City of North St. Paul are in favor of this annexation. Alternatives 1. Transfer the property to North St. Paul. 2. Retain the property in Maplewood and enter into a joint powers agreement with North St.Paul to prov snow plowing and emergency services. 3. Retain the property in Maplewood and provide municipal services. Comments Th property should be annexed to the City of North St. Paul. It is isolated from other Maplewood residential properties and is a part of the abutting North St. Paul neighborhood. The proposed l sizes would be compatible .with the smaller lots permitted in North St. Paul , but would require a variance from Maplewood code An agreement with North St. Paul to provide snow plowing and emergency servi should not be considered This agreement would require Maplewood to make an annual cash payment to North St. Paul to reimburse them for the services rendered. Recommendation Approve the enclosed resolution (page 7), authorizing the concurrent detachment from Maplewood and annexation to North St. Paul of 2091 Belmont Lane. BACKGROUND Site Description Gross area: 2.95 acres Existing land use: single dwelling _ Surrounding Land Uses North: abandoned railroad right -of -way. North of the right -of -way are single dwellings East: unimproved Ari el Street right -of -way. Across the right -of -way is North St. Paul. South and west: Goodrich golf course Planning 1. Land Use Plan designation: RM, residential medium density. 2. Zoning: present - R1, single dwelling proposed - R2, double dwelling 3. Minimum single dwelling lot requirements: A. Maplewood Section 30-8(f)(1): 1. R1 - 75 feet wide and 10,000 square feet 2. R2 - 75 feet wide and 7,500 square feet B. North St. Paul: 1. RIB - 65 feet wide and 7,800 square feet 4. Proposed lot sizes (page 6 ) A. Each lot would have more than 7,500 square feet of area. B. Two of the six lots would have 65 to 75 feet of width. Public Works and Public Safet 1. The only access to this property is from 7th Street in North St. Paul which is 600 feet east of the Maplewood boundary (page 5) . Snow plowing and emergency services should be provided from North St. Paul 20= This .summer, North St. Paul wi l'l be building Ari el Street between the proposed Eldridge Court and the abandoned railroad tracks and Eldridge and Burke Avenues between Ariel and 7th Streets (page 5). The proposed Eldridge Court cul -de -sac and u t i l i t i e s will be included in this construction if Maplewood authorize the costs to be assessed to the property. City of North St. Paul On April 16, the North St. Paul City Council gave concept approval to annexing this property. They also gave concept approval to the proposed plat, subject to minor revisions. 2- Finance 1. Taxes due to Maplewood in 1984 from this site are $195.99. 2. This property's proportional responsibility for Mapl ewood' s total bonded indebtedness, as.-of December 31, 1983, was $859.50. This means that a. tax of up to .$859-50 could be - l evi ed against this property., even if it- were annexed to North St. Paul , if additional funds were to become necessary for Maplewood to meet its bond obligation payments. 3. A special assessment balance of $1465.36 for County Ditch #17 is levied against this property. This balance would continue to be paid as part of the annual property taxes. Procedure 1. Planning commission recommendation 2. North St. Paul City Council approval 2. Maplewood City Council approval 3. Minnesota Municipal Board approval No public hearings are required. Both cities must agree to the annexation. jw attachments 1. Location map 2. Property line /zoning map 3. Prel i mi nary Plat 4. Resolution 3- ec vwv W JAt W KOHLMAN VE. . cr s z J 2 •'Q :. cu Y > EDGEHIU- s t oc J 65LIDEMONT . AVE. _ 7 to cr AV 11 to AVE. t W i too dwNTASEX 7 VA 1 + AX RANDVIEW _ coov-f r Ap 7 0 L[3:6ide VIKING 0 R. ASTLE AV ' t RE AVE R E AVE. AVE. OPE AVE. to AVE. : ~ LARK AVE. f IE RDRD. LAURIE Y 4 z z avE. 65 N C2,1 KE A 1 op AVE. O • MA WOOD R' (1) ISTANICH CT. f PUBLICW BLDG.710 . N 64 nd 7019D AVE. = HA IRIS Soo j TYLAN li ja I- M rf t J W W ac Woken L W ROS ylQOD AVE. a 0 29 s IH 4 uo All 5 w 3 R WE 1 0 2 9s ; a _ , 3 Z PRICE % AVE NORTH ST. PAIL 68 1 HOLLOW oe AY AVE. F- GE .'• .• o ... E210 7 RI PLEY AVE. 1 Q LOCATION MAP 4—Attachment 1 4 N Y .ROAD BCOUNT - _ w 91 14 Of 133.3 Ai 75 75 83 ' Qi D t 3 _ 1 .*VGA. 1101.98 9 5 .4 V — ( ' t 3 3 3 • '- C s J s : ,""®" i r ti.• O t^ O t 6 t ,„ , /! ., `. s i err i t u, 91. 1 ; . ter _# tea. a a- To be constructed (1984 --- 4 Imo.9 o w Uj c 59 $ . 0;0 f 1 MONO To be constructed (1984) 41;r r . JL 1 . 2091 N T Un i mproved GOODRICH GOLF COUR 1 • • `::fit , __ ;,; ., .. ?,- • s — — — — — — — — rA r.,..,. -- —. •.r`.r.r rc. --- ,.,,-- -- ..,,; .rtiir ..,,,,,,r . :,,:, q; e' , ° t ice. i i ! —_ y .. PROPERTY LINE / MAP 5 - Attachment 2 4 N 1 li A •` r ,. ',` ^ I J tt CC Ltd ^ Q O - s i ,, ao rt setscic uNC 1 1 _ 1 o - rib1x E L DR 1 E AVE. x wao a ,i v y G r t t ;-+ T ss i 3 x c Z i I as sa I t sLs GOODRICH GOLF COURSE BE LMONT AVE. ELDRIDGE COURT PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT 6_Attachment 3 Q N s Pursuant to due call and not thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of , 1984 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: _- WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Maplewood of the State. of Minnesota resolves that the following described property is located in the State of Minnesota, County of Ramsey: All that part of the NE - of the NWT of Section 14, T 29, R 22, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the center l i n e of Section 14, aforesaid, which is 334.24 feet north of the SE corner of the NE - of the NWT of said Section 14; thence running north on said center l i n e a distance of 574.32 feet to a point of intersection with the Minnesota St. Croix and Wisconsin Rail- road Company's right -of -way limits; thence southwesterly along said right -of -way limits a distance of 307.28 feet to a point; thence south a distance of 416.98 feet to a point and then east a distance of 263.59 feet to the point of beginning, containing 3 acres more or less, according to the Government Survey; WHEREAS, the above described property is now located in the City of Maplewood, abuts the City of North St. Paul and is property subject to concurrent detachment and annexation by concurrent resolutions of the two council of the two municipalities, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 414.061; WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City of Maplewood that the above described property be concurrently detached from the City of Maplewood and annexed to the City of North St. Paul ; WHEREAS, this resolution is being adopted concurrently with a similar resolution by the City Counci of the City of North St. Paul approving such detachment and annexation as provided above; WHEREAS, this annexation proposal was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commi on May 7, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said annexation be WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council considered this annexation proposal on May 14 19840 NOW, THEREFORE, BE 'IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above described concurrent detachment and annexation shall be effective upon the issuance of the Minnesota Municipal Board's order or at -such later date as provided by the Board in its order. Adopted this 14th day of May, 1984. Seconded by Ayes- 7- STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the 14th day of May, 1984, with the original on file i n my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this annexation request. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1984. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota If 8_ s I i' MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: DATE: City Manager Associate Planner -- Johnson Plan Amendment East of Desoto Street, south of Roselawn Avenue. Parks Commission March 29, 1984 s SUMMARY Request Action by Council: Endorse Modified___ Rejected-. - Date Del the park search area located east of DeSoto Street and south of Roselawn Avenue from the parks and land use elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Reasons for the Request On March 19, 1984, the Parks Commission, in review of the Twin Oaks pre - lininary plat (page 6 ), determined that there is no need to continue to plan for a neighborhood park at this location. Edgerton Park and the adjacent school recreation facilities are adequate to serve the neighborhood park needs i n this area. The projected population of the area south of Roselawn Avenue of 1302 persons is too small to justify a neighborhood park. The Director of Community Services states that the stop lights at Edgerton Street and Roselawn Avenue provide those persons living south of Roselawn Avenue with safe walking access to Edgerton Park. Recommendation Approve the enclosed. resol (page 7 ) to delete the neighborhood park search area located east of DeSoto Street, south of Roselawn Avenue, on the basis that: t 1. There is inadequate population potential to support this park, given that the Edgerton school grounds and Edgerton Park are within its planned service area and only two blocks away. 2. Th stop lights at Edgerton Street provide safe pedestrian access from south of Roselawn Avenue to the Edgerton Park facilities. 3. The cost for acquisition and development would be high. 4. Nearly one - fourth of the site would be unusable because of steep slopes and a storm water pond. 7 46i it f BACKGROUND Past Actions 5 -78: The city land appra i ser, Winfield Mitchell appraised the 4.7 acre Clausen property (page 6) for purchase as a neighborhood park. No a=nti on was taken to acquire the property. 2 -81: The Parks and Recreation Commission stated no objection to the development of the Clausen property or the Coil property (page 6) for residential use. The Torgerson property (page 6) was cited as the parks commission's preference for the future neighborhood park. 10- 10 -83: Council approved the Clausen Addition preliminary plat- -the property abutting the east boundary of the Torgerson property. 3- 19 -84: The parks commission recommended that if council chooses to retain this park search area, that a trail easement should be granted from the proposed Bellwood Avenue cul -de -sac (Twin Oaks plat - -page 6 ),, south to the park. P1 anning 1. Section 462.355 of State Statutes require the planning agency (planning commission) to coordinate the planning activities of other departments and agencies of the municipality to insure conformity with and to assist in the development of the comprehensive municipal plan. 2. The service area for this future park (page 5 ) has a present Land Use Plan population of 2305 persons. When full development occurs, the.total Land Use Plan population would be about 3230 persons, assuming development occurs as presently planned. 3. The usable area of this park site is about 5.4 acres. Parks 10 A neighborhood park is defined as follows (page E -18 Parks Plan) A neighborhood park "is intended to provide the basic park services on a strictly local basis. The service area should be limited to 1/2 mile and serves between 3,000 and 5,000 people. The park serves the primary needs of persons from 5 to 17 years of age and also affords limited opportunities io ,all age groups. These sites should provide year round programs. The park site should contain at least 5 acres suitable for recreation and a recommended standard for nei ghbor- hood P arks is 2.5 acres per 1000 residents. If possible, these sites should adjoin an elementary school. 2. All Maplewood property within 112 mile of this planned park is also within one -half mile of the existing Edgerton Park and Edgerton School grounds (page 5). 2 Public Works 1. The drainage plan calls for a storm water holding pond in the southeast corner of the site. 2. The southeast quarter of the site contains very steep topography averaging between 35 and 40 percent of slope. Procedure 1. Parks commission recommendation 2. Planning commission recommendation following a public hearing 3. City council decision jW Attachments 1. Park system plan 2. Park service area 3. Property line map 4. Resolution 3 7 1IIlt , • I1H 3 mass MEN Ott t .... quo 1 _ on= o e _. T a- V ....• ..mow. t s S t x 51M IMP its... . ..I..('(:. -rte' '•: :•rT '':- .riiK -.ih Parkside NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN , 1 Attachment 1 a 1 Nterchange ptterr .nr I n -. iICounthe ' Imayorciecor -- IOS - I _. CD o { minor - o mi-i o ec wrvso ;.ow Rosh - major cotiectorMr 'g -interchan e _ C .! S s - CD - _ CU interchange major arterial L' arpenteur •• , . ., , W O n -- E01 ` R V 1 SC LSC s PARK SERVICE AREA Planned Park (Torgerson Property) Existing Population - 2305 Future Population -- 3230 Existing Edgerton Park &School Playground 5 Attachment 2' A 4.0H6. 9 I xP-- I N OF 1 - 75.0 c x 1.0 . ...... . 689.0 0 . ......... oN if B E L WOOD AVENUE 880 03-C PROPOSED CLAUSEN ADDITION oI a 9.5 1-901 o x 5 . y: j • • . co Wofer PROPOSED PARK 859.5 110DSITE Al 861.5 Mvg 75 Ir 10I 876.5de00, w oo.859.0 86.w b b bm. -:T X 8 6 7.0 1 914.5 904.5 -.0/ x / x 40 Woo - 7Z 0 wo t e.0 856.5 tfyM - r.% Z ir x fr fD NEI780 851.5 \ \ i KB L. 9 Twin ,Oaks Plat AREA STREET ALIGNMENT CONCEPT IF PARK SEARCH AREA IS DELETED 6 im 4M Attachment thrbe 0i ti I RESOLUTION N0. WHEREAS, thT City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the Maplewood- comprehensive plan to delete the neighborhood parr search area located east of DeSoto Street and south of Roselawn Avenue. This property is more commonly referred to as the Torgerson property. WHEREAS, the procedural history -of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. This plan amendment was initiated by the parks commission on March 19, 19840 2. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 16, 1984 to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were .given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said plan amendment be 3. The Maplewood City Council considered said pl amendment on 1984. The council considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL.. that the above - described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. There is inadequate population potential -to support this park, given that the Edgerton School grounds and Edgerton Park are within Ats planned service area and only two blocks away. 2. The 'stop lights at Edgerton Street provide safe pedestrian access from south of Rosel awn Avenue to the Edgerton Park facilities. 3. The cost for acquisition and development would be high. 4. Nearly one- fourth of the site would be unusable because of steep slopes and a storm water pond. Adopted this day of 1984. Seconded by Ayes -- t 7 Attachment 4 P76 MEMORANDUM Action by Council TO: City Manager En.dorsecd._.__....._..— FROM: Finance Director - c' Modified-..°- ._ --. RE: 1983 Annual Financial Reports Reiecte DATE: .._.p and Audit May 7, 1984 Date Recently the City's 1983 Annual Financiala1 Reports and audit were completed. Thredocumentshavebeenprepared: e 1) General Purp Fin. i • p Financial Report - contai ns\ data extractedfromtheComprehensiveAnnualFinancialRear •o t and providesaconcisummaryoftheCity's financial condi ti ' report will on . CopiesofthisrepbedistributedtotheCity's advisorboardsan.d. commissi-on.s. .A1 so. a y im1ted supply will beavai.l abl e to the public. r 2 ) Comprehensive Annual Fi nanc i al Report - contains detailedfinancialandstatisticalinformationtorinformsippvdecompletetononallfinancialtransactionsear.Copies of this re during the report will g y p 1 be distributed to the Council,State Auditor, Moody 's Investors Service StandardPoorsbond d and investors and the Maplewood Library, 3) Management Letter - contains the auditors comments andrecommendationsregardingfinancialmanagement. Copies ofthisletterwillbedistributed p • to the Council and Financestaff. It is recommended that the Council schedule a meeting with the auditors todiscussthesereports, In the past, these meetinngs have been held n conjunctionwiththeregularCouncil -Staff meeting on Thursdays. As an alternattine a specialmeetingcouldbeheldtoallowmoretimefordiscussionandreviewofthereports, DFF :1 nb