HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984 02-27 City Council Packetf
MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00.P.M., Monday, February 27, 1984
Council Chambers, M u n i c i p a l B u i l d i n g
. Meeting No. 84 -04
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was h e l d in the Council
Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7:01 P.M. by Mayor Greavu.
B. ROLL CALL
John C.- Greavu, Mayor Present
Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present
Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present
MaryLee Maida, Councilmember Present
Michael T.' Wasiluk, Councilmember Present
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes No. 84 -02 (February 13, 1984 & February 16, 1984)
r
Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the Minutes No. 84 -03 (February 13, 1984 and
February 16, 1984) as submitted.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - ail.
.D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amen
- 1. Cable T.V.
2. 3M Meeting
3. Commission Meetings
4. Ordinance - Exotic Dancers
5. Dump Site Meetings
6. Minnesota Municipal Legislative Committee Meeting
7. Storm Water Overflow
80 Reconsideration
9.. Meeting with Attorney
Seco by Councilmember Ma i da .
Ayes - all.
E. CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Anderson moved, seconded by Councilmember Bastian, Ayes all, to approv
the Consent Agenda Items 1 and 2 as recommended:
1. Accounts Payable
Approved the accounts (Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses, Check register dated February
15 1984 - $90,139.02: Part II, Payroll Check dated February 10, 1984 - $61
in the amount of $151,718.14.
- 1 - 2/27
• 20 E..M.T..Instructor Pay
Approved EMT - Instructor pay to be paramedics be paid at time and one half rate and
the lay instructors be paid at the rate of 74/ of the top p o l i c e officer time and
one half rate which at the present rate of pay would be $14.95 per hour.
F.
PUBLLf, HEARINGS
1. 7; 0 P.M. - Rezoning: Maryland to Lakewood
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposed
rezoning of the south side of Maryland Avenue between Lakewood Drive and Sterling
Street from F -Farm Residence to R -3 Multiple Dwelling. The Clerk stated the hearing
"notice was in order and noted the dates of publication.
b. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
c. Commissioner Dorothy Hejny presented the following P l a n n i n g Commission report:
"Commissioner Prew moved the Planning Commission forward the following resolution
to the C.i ty Counc ' 1.: I- r'7
WHEREAS, t C, ty of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F. farm residence
to R -3, mu 1 t i p e r the following described property:
Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8. Block 1, the north 224 feet of Lots 5 and 6, and
all of Lots 7 and 8, Block 2, Beaver Lake Addition.
D
NOW, THEREFO E IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the
above described eso i ng be approved on the basis of the following findings of
fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent
of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the
use of the neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood,
and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the
proposed change or place is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of
the community, where a p p l i c a b l e , and the p u b l i c welfare,
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the l oa i ca 1 , effic-
ient, and economical extension of p u b l i c services and f a c i l i t i e s , such
as p u b l i c water, sewers, p o l i c e and fire protection and s c h o o l s ' .
Commissioner Hejny seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Fischer,
Hejny, Pel l ish, Prew, Robens, Sigmundik, Sletten, Whitcomb."
d. Mr. Richard Schreier, 2125 DeSoto Street, co -owner of the property, spoke
on behalf of his proposal.
e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard:
2 - 2/27
Frances Dreawves, 1060 Lakewood
Mark Doeh 1 i ng,' 1 1 1 5 Sterling (read a letter from the resident of 1 1 1 6 S t e r l i n g )
Mrs. K.M. Peterson, 1085 Mary
Harry Zacho, White Bear Lake, Minnesota.
g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
h. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved 'its adoption:
WHEREAS, th y C t
to R 73, multipl f r
Lots 5, 6, 7 and
of Lots 7 and 8,
84 -2 -34
y of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F, Farin residence
the following described property:
8, Block 1, the North 224 feet of Lots 5 and 6, and all
Block 2, Beaver Lake Addition
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as f o l l o w s :
1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to chapter
36, article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood P l a n n i n g Commission on January
16, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that
said rezoning be approved.
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on February 27, 1984
to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant
to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity
to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered
reports and recommendations of the city staff and P l a n n i n g Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above
described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent
of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the
use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood,
and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the
proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of
the community, where a p p l i c a b l e , and the p u b l i c welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, eff i c-
ient, and economical extension of p u b l i c services and f a c i l i t i e s , such
as public water, sewers, police and protection and schools.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all.
2. 7:15 P . M. , P 1 an Amendment and Rezoning: Frost and English
- 3 - 2/27
a . Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding proposed
i zone change from M -2 Heavy Manufacturing to BC Bus i nes s- Commercial R -3 M u l t i p l e '
Dwe 1 1 i ng R -2 Doubl D w e l l i n g the property located at th e southwest corner of frost
Avenue and English Street.
b. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
c. Cm y gyp
Commissioner s s i oner Doroth He 'n resented the fo P l a n n i n g Commission report:
"Commissioner Pe 1 l i sh roved the P l a n n i n g Commission forward the following resolut-
ions to the City Council:
WHEREAS,, S the City of M initiated an amendment to the Maplewood Com-
p
rehens i ve P l a n from SC, service commercial to RM, res i dent i a 1 medium density
for the northwest corner of English Street and Fr i sb i e Avenue.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING Commission that the
above described p l a n amendment be approved on the ba of the f o l l o w i n g findings-
of-fact:
1. It is not economically feasible to develop this whole site residentially.
2. Additional residential density. will compensate for the loss of density
in other areas of the city from plan amendment in the last year.
3. RM development would make a better buffer for the homes on Frisbie Avenue,
than SC development; and
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated rezon i ngs for the f o l l o w i n g described
property:
Un fatted Lands sub to streets and avenues, the' north 990 feet of the
� a
NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 16, Township 29, Range 22.
This ro ert is located at the southwest corner of English Street, and Frost Avenue.
p p y
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the
above described property be rezoned as f o l l o w s :
1. The north 500 feet of the east 730 feet shall be rezoned BC, business
commercial.
2. The north 760 feet of the east 990 feet, except the north 500 feet of
the east 730 feet shall be rezoned R -3, multiple dwel
3. The ba of the property shall be rezoned R -?_, double d w e l l i n g s .
The above rezon i ngs are approved on the basis of the fol findings-of-
fact:
1. The propo beu%c change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent
of th zoni g cod
2, Th proposed change will not substant injure or detract from the
use of th neighboring property or from character of the neighborhood, and
that the ..se of the property adjacent to the area - included in the proposed change
or plan is adequately safeguarded.
- 4 - 2/27
The ro osed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of
, p p 9 �.
the communi where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, effic-
ion.- and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public
water,, sewers po 1 'i ce and fire protection and schools.
Commissioner Ell of son seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdah l , Barrett,
Ellefson, Heany, Pellish, R Sletten, Whitcomb."
w .
d. Mr. Keith Schoou i st, archetec spoke in behalf of the proposal.
e. Mayor Greavu.called for proponents. None were heard.
f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard:
Carl Grill, 1260 Frisbie
Robert Shamly, 1264 F r i s b i e
Mrs. Shamly, 1264 Frisbie.
g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
h, Counc i lmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
(Plan Amendment)
64 -2 -35
WHEREAS, the C.i ty of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the Map compre-
hens i ve plan from SC, service commercial to RM, r e s i d e n t i a l medium, dens for
the northwest corner of English Street and Frisbie Avenue.
WHEREAS, the p rocedura 1 history of this plan amendment is as follows:
1. This plan amendment was initiated b v the City of Maplewood.
P
2. The Maplewood P l a n n i n g Commi ssion h e l d a p u b l i c hearing on February 6,
1964 to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and
mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given
op to be heard and resent written statements. The Plannina
an o
Pp y P
Commission recommended to the C i t v Council that said plan amendment be
approved.
3. The Map lewood City Council considered said plan amendment on February
27, 1964. The Council considered reports and recommendations from the
Planning Commission and City staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above
described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the f o l l o w i n g findings -of-
fact:
1. It is not economically feasible to develop this whole site residentially.
2. Addit residential density w i l l compensate for the loss of density
in other areas of the City from plan a ;,endment s in the l a s t year.
3, RM developme would make a better buffer for the homes on F r i s b i e Avenue,
than SC development.
- 5 2/27
0
Seconded by Council member Ma i da Ayes - all.
'
Councilmember Anderson introduced the fo l l owi nay resolution and moved its
i.
adoption: (Rezoning)
84 -2 -36
WHEREAS,, the p
he City of M in rezonings for the following described
property:
Un latted Lands, subject to streets and avenues, the north 990 feet of The
P t' Township 29 Ran
NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section on 16 , p a 22. 9
This ro ert y i s , l ocated at the southwest corner of English Street and Frost
P P J
Avenue
S the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1. This ., g
rezonin was initiated by the City of Maplewood, - pursuant to chapter
36, art icle VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances*
reviewed b the M Planning Commission on February
2. This rezoning was y p
6 1984. The P l a n n i n g Commission recommended to the City Council that
said rezoning be approved.
3. The Y
he Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on February 27, 1984
.
to consider der t h i s rezoning. Notice thereof was published and m a i l e d pursuant
persons resent at said hearing were given an opportunity
to law. All pens p g
to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered
P
re orts and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commi ss I ion.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above
describe property
� d A be rezoned as follows:
1. The north 500 feet of the east 730 feet shall be rezoned BC, business
commercial.
2. The north 760 feet of the east 990 feet, except the north 500 feet of
the east 730 feet shall be . rezoned R -3, multiple dwellings.
3. The balance of the property shall be rezoned R -2, double dwellings.
The above P
rezonin 9 s are approved on the basis of the following findings of
fact •
1. The ro osed change is consi with the spirit, purpose and intent
p P 9
of the zoning code.
2. T h e r o osed change w i l l not substantially injure . or detract from the
P P g
use of neighboring property or from the character of the ne i- g hborhood
and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included i n the
proposed change or p l a n i s adequately safeguarded.
3. The ro osed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of
P P g
the commun where a p p l i c a b l e , and the public welfare*
- 6- 2/27
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities,
such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
Seconded by Counc i lmember Ma i da . Ayes - all.
3. 7:.30 P . M. - Rezoni 1905 Radatz to Whi Bear Avenue
a; Ma y or Greavu convened the meeting for a p u b l i c hearing for a proposed rezoning
� � the property from F arm Residence to LBC Limited ted Business Commercial, a 1, p p y on Radatz
Avenue, 1905 Radatz east to White Bear Avenue.
b, Manager Evans presented the staff report.
� y P
c.
Commissioner 'Dorothy He'n resen±ed t-he following Planning Commission recom-
mendat i on :
"Commissioner Whitcomb moved t'he Planning Cor;mission forward the following resolut-
ion to the City Council:
WHEREAS, the City ' of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F, farm residence
to LBC, limited business commercial for the fol lowing described properties:
Except the north 505 feet and except the west 1685 feet, that part of the
SW 1/4 of Section 2. Township 29 Range 22 north of Radatz Avenue and 1trest
of White Bear Avenue. Also mown as 2629 White Bear Avenue.
Except the north 305 feet, , east 100 feet of the west 1685 feet of the
SW 1 /4 of Section 2 , Towns p 29, Range 22 lying north of Radatz Avenue.
Also known as 192.7 Radatz �� ' ue.
Except the north 305 feet, the east 140 feet of the west 1585 feet of that
p � � l ying north of Radatz
part of the S .4 1/4 of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22
Avenue.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the
above described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of
fact:
1. The ro osed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent
P P 9
of the zoning code.
2. The ro osed change will not substantia injure or detract from the
P P 9 �.
use of neighboring property or fr.orm the character of the neighborhood, and that
the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or
plan is adequately safeguarded*
3 The proposed change wi1.1 serve the best interests - and conveniences of
the commun where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, eff i c-
ien t and economical extens - of p u b l i c services and facilities, such as p u b l i c
water, sewers, p o l i c e and fire protection and schools.
Commissioner El lefson seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett,
E1 lefson, He jny, Pel l ish, Robens, Sletten, Whitcomb."
- 7 - 2/27
d. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the
proposal. The following persons voiced their opinions:
Mrs. Jordon, 1905 White Bear Avenue
Mr. Richard Leko, 1890 Radatz
Mrs. Linda Rademacher, 1910 Radatz Avenue
Mrs. Jeanne Todd, 2800 white Bear Avenue
Mrs. Donna Lynch, 1900 Radatz Avenue
Mrs. Nora Germain, 1851 Radatz Avenue
Mrs. Esther Schoenberger, 2811 White Bear Avenue
Mr. Robert Heinbuck, 2817 White Bear Avenue
Mr. Donald Patwell, 1927 Radatz Avenue
e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
f. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption
84 -2 -37
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F, farm residence
to LBC, limited business commercial for the following described properties:
Except the north 505 feet and except the west 1685 feet, that part
of the SW 1/4 of Section 2, To Mship 29, Range 22 north of Radatz
Avenue and west of White Bear V ue. Also known as 2829 White
Bear Avenue
Except the north 305 feet, the east 100 feet of the west 1685
feet of the SW 1/4 of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22 lying north
of Radatz Avenue. Also known as 1927 Radatz Avenue
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to
chapter 36, article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on
February 6, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council
that said rezoning be approved.
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on February 27, 1984,
to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to
law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard
and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and
recommendations of the city staff and Planning Commission,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the
above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings
of fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent
of the zoning code .
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the
use of the neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and
that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed
change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
- 8 - 2/27
3.. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences
of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
4 The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such
as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. -
4. Rezoning: Beam Avenue East of White Bear Avenue.
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a
request of Mr. Paul Stifter for a zone change from F, farm residence to R -2, double -
dwelling, the property on Beam Avenue east of 2029 - 2031 Beam Avenue.
b. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
C. Commissioner Dorothy Hojr�y presented the following Planning Commission
recommendation:
C ommissioner Barrett moved the Planning Commission forward the following reso-
lution to the City Council:
WHEREAS, Paul Stifter initiated a rezoning from F, farm residence to
R -2, residence district (double dwelling) for the following- described
property:
The N 1/2 of the East 100 feet of the West 320 feet of the NW 1/4 of
the NW 1 /4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, except
the North 33 feet thereof.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COlVMSSION
that the above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following
findings -of -fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and
intent of the Zoning code..
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from
the use of neighboring property from the character of the neighborhood,
and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the pro-
posed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences
of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such
as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
Commissioner Hejny seconded. Ayes - C 'ssioners Axdahl, Barrett,
Ellefson, Hejny, Pellish, Robens, Sletten, Whitcomb
d. .Mr. Paul Stifter, 1758 Bohland, the applicant, spoke on behalf of this request.
- 9 - 2/27
e. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the
proposal. The following were heard:
Mr. Al Harmon, 2045 R.a.dat z Avenue
Mrs. Mary Harmon, 2015 Radatz Avenue
f. Mayor Greavu, closed the public hearing.
g. Councilmember Maida introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
$4 -2 -38
WHEREAS, Paul Stifter initiated a rezoning from F, farm residence to R -2
residence district (double dwelling) for the following- described property:
The N 112 of the East 100 feet of the West 324 feet of the NW 1/4 of
the NW 1/4 of the SE 1 /4 of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, except
the North 33 feet thereof.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1. This rezoning was initiated by Paul Stifter, pursuant to chapter 36,
article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on
February 6, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that
said rezoning be approved.
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on February 27, 1984,
to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant
to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be
heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports
and recommendations of the city staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the
above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings
of fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and
intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from
the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood,
and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed
change or plan.is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences
of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such
as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all.
- 10 - 2/27
5. $:00 P.M. - Rezoning and Vair ces Fenton and Jackson.
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request
of Mr. Richard Miller for a rezoning of the northwest corner of Fenton Avenue
and Jackson Street from R -1, single dwelling, to R -2, double dwelling, and for a
lot frontage variance of 25.51 feet and a variance for a 10 foot front yard
setback.
b Manager Evans presented the staff report.
C, Commissioner Dorothy Hejny presented the following Planning Commission
recommendation:
tl
Commissioner Pellish moved the Planning Commission forward the following
resolution to the City Council:
WHEREAS, Richard Miller initiated a rezoning fro 1, single
dwelling residential to R -2, double dwelling residential for the following -
described property:
Lot 15, Block 1, Roinestad's Thompson Park
This property is also known as the northwest corner of Fenton Avenue and
Jackson Street, Maplewood;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
that the above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following
findings -of -fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent
of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from
the use of the neighboring property or. from the character of the neighbor-
hood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in
the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences
of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such
as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools, and
WHEREAS, Richard Miller applied for a variance for the following-
described property:
Lot 15, Block 1, Roinestad's Thompson Park
This property'is also known as the northwest corner-of Fenton Avenue and
Jackson Street, Maplewood;
WHEREAS,-section 36 -70 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires
thirty feet as the minimum front setback;
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a front setback of twenty feet,
requiring a variance of ten feet •
- 11 - 2/27
r WHEREAS, section 36 -88 (c) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires
that the minimum lot width for a corner lot be at least 100 feet;
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a lot width of 74.49 feet, requiring
a variance of 25.51 feet;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLYNOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
that the above- described variance be approved on the basis of the following
findings -of -fact:
1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship since no additional
land can be obtained from the lot to the north to increase the lot width.
2. The width of the lot is in character with other lots in the
neighborhood.
3. The building would line up with the house to the west.
4. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
ordinance since the sight lines along Fenton Avenue and Jackson Street
would not be affected.
5. Council previously approved a lot width and setback variance for
the house to the west.
Commissioner Sletten seconded. Ayes - C 'ssioners Axdahl, Barrett,
Ellefson, He jny, Pellish, Robens, Sletten, Whitcomb . 0
d. Mr. Richard Miller, the applicant, spoke on behalf of his proposal.
e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
f. Mayor Greavu (cliled for opponents. None were heard.
g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
h. Councilmember Wasiluk introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
84 - 2 - 39
WHEREAS, Richard Miller initiated a rezoning from R -1, single dwelling
residential to R -2, double dwelling residential for the following described
property:
Lot 15, Block 1, Roinestad's Thompson Park
This property is also known as the northwest corner of Fenton Avenue and
Jackson Street, .Ma.plewood;
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1. This rezoning was initiated by Richard Miller, pursuant to chapter 36
article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinance.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on
February 6, 19$4. The Planning Commission recommended to the City
Council that said rezoning be approved.
- 12 - 2/27
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing February 27,
1984, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was. published and
mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given
an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council
also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and
Planning Commission,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the
above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings -
of -fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent
of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from
the use of neighboring property or from the character of the
neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the
area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences
of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities,
such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
Seconded by Council-member Anderson. Ayes - all.
i. Councilmember Wasiluk introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
84 -2 -40
WHEREAS, Richard Miller applied for a variance for the following- described
property:
Lot 15, Block 1, Roin.estad's Thompson Park
This property is also known as the northwest corner of Fenton Avenue and
Jackson Street, Maplewood;
WHEREAS, section 36 -70 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires
thirty feet as the minimum front setback;
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a front setback of twenty feet,
requiring a variance of ten feet;
WHEREAS, section 36 -88 (c) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires
that the minimum lot width for a corner lot be at least 100 feet;
WHEREAS the applicant is proposing a lot width of 71.49 feet, requiring
a variance of 25.51 feet;
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows:
0
- 13 - 2/27
1. This variance was applied for on January 19, 1984.
2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on
February 6, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the City
Council that said variance be approved.
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on February 27,
1984, to consider this variance. Notice thereof was _ published and
mailed pursuant to law. All persons present. at said hearing were
given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements.
The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the city
staff and Planning Commission,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above -
described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings -of -fact :
1. Strict enfor cement would cause undue hardship since no additional
land can be obtained from the lot to the north to increase the
lot width.
2. The width of the lot is in character with other lots in the neigh -
borhood.
3. The building would line up with the house to the west.
4. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
ordinance since the sight lines along Fenton Avenue and Jackson Street
Would not be affected.
5. Council previously approved a lot width and setback variance for
the house to the west.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
6. 8:15 P.M. - Sign Height Variance: Cub Foods
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request
of Cub Foods for a sign height variance for two signs of five feet each at
100 W. County Road B.
b. meager Evans presented the staff report.
C. Board Member George Rossbach presented the following Community Design Review
Board report:
Board Member Deans moved the Board recommend denial of the sign
height variances of five feet for the two proposed Cub Food Store pylons
signs, on the basis that:
1. There are not any physical characteristics unique to the property
which would cause an undue hardship if the code is complied with.
• 2. There is ample landscaped area in which the signs could be placed
at their proposed height and still meet the required fifteen -foot
setback without loss of any parking spaces.
- 14 - 2/27
3. Approval of a five -foot height variance for the proposed signs would
be contrary to the spirit and intent of the ' ordinance . Conforming
signs of 25 -feet tall would be eas' . le from County Road B
and Rice Street at the proposed ocated at he property line.
D Board Member Peterson.seconded. Ayes - all.
.d, Mr. Tom Thueson, representing Cub Foods, spoke on behalf of the request.
e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
f, Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard.
_g., Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
h. Councilmember Bastian moved to deny the request of Cub Foods for a 5 -foot
sign height variance for two signs based on the staff and Community Design
-Review Board's recommendations,
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all.
F. AWARD OF BIDS
None.
H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1.. variance: 1750 English Street
R.. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
b. Commissioner Dorothy Hejny presented the following Planning Commission recom-
mendation:
T. . .
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission forward the following
resolution to the City Council:
WHEREAS, Loren Harrison applied for a variance for the following -
described property:
The south 50 feet of the north 225 feet of part south of Lot $,
Block 4, Gladstone Plat 3 of west 158 feet of SW 1 /4 of 5W 1 /4
together with ex sd west 15$ feet and ex north 175 feet of south
of sd lot $and ex S 767 feet 5/100 feet part W of NP RY R/W of sd 1 /4 1/4,
all in Section 15, Township 29, Range 22.
This property is also known as 1950 English Street, Maplewood;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
that the above - described variance be approved on the basis of the following
findings -of -fact:
0
1. Denial would not serve a public purpose.
2. The request is consistent with the spirit and intent of the zoning
code, in that, the structure would be compatible with existing
- 15 - 2/27
neighborhood dwellings and the floor plan would provide for
adequate living area.
3. The applicant would be caused a value hardship if required to
expand the proposed dwelling due to the unique age, style and
orientation of the existing dwellings in this neighborhood.
Commissioner tten
seconded.
Ayes
- Commissioners Axdahl,
Fischer He' Ple 'sh
Prew, Robens,
Sigmundik,
Sletten, Whitcomb
c. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
$4 -2 -41
WHEREAS, Loren Harrison applied for a variance for the following- described
property:
The South 50 feet of North 225 feet of part S of Lot 8, Block 4,
Gladstone Plat 3 of [Nest 15$ feet of SW 1/1+ of SW 1/4 together
with ex sd West 15$ feet and ex North 175 feet of S of sd Lot $
and ex S 767 feet 56/100 feet part W of NP RY R/W of sd 1/4 1/4,
all in Section 15, Township 29, Range 22.
This property is also known as 1750 English Street, Maplewood;
WHEREAS, section 36 -67 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires 950
square feet as the minimum floor area for a one -story dwelling;
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing 896 square feet requiring a variance
of 54 square feet;
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows:
1. This variance was applied for on November 17, 1983•
2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on
Jan ua ry 16 , 9 �+ 1 $ . The Planning Commission recommended to the City
Council that said variance be approved.
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on February 27,
1984, to consider this variance. Notice thereof was published
and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing
were given an opportunity to be heard and present written state-
ments. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of
the city staff and Planning Commission.
NOW I THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MA.PLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-
described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact:
1. Denial would not serve a public purpose.
2. The request is consistent with the spirit and intent of the zoning
code, in that, the structure would be compatible with existing
neighborhood dwellings and the floor plan would provide for adequate
living area.
- 16 _ 2/27
0
o
c�
w
oeol
110 11
OF
/���� Cam✓ .o¢u�u�J ' O
A�f
0
V � e �
of 004 Connissioner Prew moved the Planning Commission forward the followin
resolution to the City Gvunci
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F. farm residence
to R -3, multiple for the following-described property:
Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8, Block 1, the north 224 feet of Lots 5 and 6,
and all of Lots 7 and 8. Block 2, Beaver Lake Addition.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
that the above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following
f
findings -of -fact: r
1. The ro osed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and
P P
intent of the zoning code. }
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from
the use of neighboring property or from the character of the
neighborhood, and that the use of . the property adjacent to the
area included in the proposed change or place is adequately
safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences
of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and
facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection
and schools.
Commissioner Hejny seconded Ayes -- ,Commissioners Axdahl ,
Fischer, Hejny, Pel 1 i sh, Prew, Robens, Si gmundi k, Sl etten, Whitcomb
w
R
w,.
0
00e 000,
.ot* �r
-00"�7 lor_� e--e
00001,
01 oo
f7v
IV
' ' � ! r t..,�ay� x �f ``�.,/�, �— �, —+C. .. �'y.,,f 'r `... "`b^' = "`n ^""^" :,✓ {� y yy ��,a�� � �^ ..
xr^`� f ` >"` F °'- Y ...: �%� : � ,.-- y`,.IrN� ,, �.r ""' +'F.::. •:, t� a V d,' {`� ."__ _. . -.� � ,.,'",�' 9.` c
Commissioner Pel 1 i s h mov ed the Plannin Commission forwar the
following resolutions to the Cit Council:
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the Maplewood
Comprehensive Plan from SC, service commercial to RM, residential medium
density for the northwest corner of English Street and Fri sbi a Avenue.
NOW:, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
that the above-described plan amendment be appebved on the basis of the
following findings -of- fact:*
I. It-is not economically feasible to develop this whole site
resi dential ly,
2. Additional residential density will compensate for the loss of
density in other areas of the city from plan amendments in the last year.
r
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the Ci Council
g y
of the Ci Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council
Chambers in said City on the day of 1984 at 7:00 P . m.
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F, Farm residence
to R -3, multiple for the following-described property:
Lots 5, 6 7 and 8. Block 1, the North 224 feet of Lots 5 and 6, and
al -1 of Lots 7 and 8, 2, Beaver Lake Addition
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant
to chapter ' 36, article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission
on January 16, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the
City Council that said rezoning be
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on "�, 9 1984
to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed
pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were" given an
opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council
also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and
Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the
above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings
o f fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and
intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from
the use of neighboring property or from the character of the
neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the
area included i.n the proposed change or plan i adequately safe-
guarded.
3. The - proposed change will serve the best interests and -conveniences
of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
- 6 - Attachment Four
4. The pro change would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities,
such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
Adopted this day of 9 1984.
Seconded by Ayes --
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS.
CITY OF PdAPLEW00D
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the
City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared
the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the
City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1984, with the original
on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript there -
from insofar as the same relates to
Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this
day of 1984.
City Clerk
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
_ 7 _
ff-.0
3. RM development would make a b -
Avenue than better buffer for the homes on Fr�sb�e
n SC development, and
WHEREAS, the Ci of Maplewood ewood i�ni '
described p t� ated rezone ngs for the following-
owi n -
property: 9
Unpl atted lands, subject to streets and
of the NE 1 4 f n avenues, the Worth 990 feet
/ o the SE 1 /4 of Section 16 Township 29, range 22.
This property .i s l ocated at
F ros t the southwest corner of English Street and
Aven
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
that the above-described property be rezoned as follows:
1. The north 500 feet of the east 730 feet shall be rezoned BC,
business commercial.
2. The north 760 feet of the east 990 feet, except the north 500 feet
of the east 730 feet shall be rezoned R -3, multiple dwellings.
3. The balance of the property shall be rezoned R -2, double dwellings.
The above rezoni ngs are approved on the basis of the following findings-
of- f act:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent
of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change w i l l not substantially injure or detract from the
use of the neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood,
and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed
change or plan i s adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences
of the community, where applicable, and the - public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such
as publ i c water, , sewers, pol ice and, f i re protecti on and school s.
Commissioner Ell efson seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl , Barrett,
Ell efson, Hejny, Pel l ish, Robens, - Sl etten, Whitcomb
�^"''�. •� -� _ � � t�, -�': �.�,y ;% }' ...,, y ��.: _ , � _;s=- `- ..�?�"cf•' .++�� r .v°y*r• r�
.el �>
r
"0
It
U r
s`1f.
-Z
47/
o ,
77
4
72)
rf
e4
c je—
t—`Zoe-
e�!
f .
x�
ly
Z,I
Vx
�,�'• _.i ",,,,.:,� • °�',.° ��"P e .` �.."•5°_''�;Y..- ,�° .. Vii! � �`"'� �%� -• - X ' r -� .+.+' °' j -�'' . `' _s�
cd
147
4e
e,
w ...
, xe
Commiss,iover Whit
moved the Pl annin Commi ssion forward the
following resolution to the City _Council
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezonin from F, farm
residence to LBC, limited business. commercial for the followin described
properties:
Except the north 505 feet and except the west 1685 feet, that part
of the SW 1/4 of Section 2,, Township 29, Ran 22 north of Radatz
Avenue and west of White Bear Avenue. Also known- -as. 2829- Wh-its -
-
Rear Avpniin
r
� r
REZONING RESOLUTION
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting o the City Council
of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council
Chambers in said City on the day of ,1984 at 7 :00 p.m.
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated rezon i ngs for the following-
described property:
0
Unplatted lands, subject to streets and avenues, the north 990 feet of
the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 16, Township 29, Range 22.
This property is located at the southwest corner of English Street and
Frost Avenue.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to
chapter 36, article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on
February 6, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the City
Council that said rezoning be
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on _a 91984
to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed
pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an
opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council
also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and Plan -
ning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the
above- described property be rezoned as follows:
1. The north 500 feet of the east 730 feet shall be rezoned BC,
business commercial.
2. The north 760 feet of the east 990 feet, except the north 500 feet
of the east 730 feet shall be rezoned R -3, multiple dwellings.
3. The balance of the property shall be rezoned R -2, docile dwellings.
The above rezoni ngs are approved on the basis of the following findings
of fact:
12 - Attachment Nine
Y
L The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of
the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the
,use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood,
and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included i n the
proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. -
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of
the community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities,
such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
.Adopted this day of 1 ,1984.
Seconded by Ayes --
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD )
1, the undersigned, being . the duly qualified and appoint - Clerk - of - the
City . of Maplewood, Minnesota do hereby certify that I have carefully compared
the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City
of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1984, with the original on
f l e i n my off i ce, and the same i s a ful 1 , true and compl ete 'transcri pt there-
from insofar as the same relates to this rezoning.
Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this
:day of 1984.
City Clerk
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
r 13 -
r
Plan Amendment Resolution
RESOLUTION N0.
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the Maplewood
comprehensive plan from SC, service commercial to RM, residential medium
density for the northwest corner of English Street and Frisbie Avenue.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as- follows:
1. This plan amendment was initiated by the City of Maplewood.
2. The Maplewood planning commission held a public. hearing 'on February 6,
1984 to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published
and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were
given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The
planning commission recommended to the city council that said plan
amendment be .�..
3. The Maplewood city council considered
1984. The council considered reports
planning commission and city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPI
above- described plan amendment be approved on
findings of fact:
said plan amendment on
and. recommendations from the
LEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the
the basis of the following
1 .
It is not economically feasible to develop this whole s i t e residential
2. Additional residential density w i l l compensate for the loss of densi
in other areas of the city from plan amendments in the last year.
3. RM development would make a better buffer for the homes on Fri sbi e
Avenue, than SC development.
Adopted this day of
Seconded by
, 1984.
Ayes --
- 11 -
Attachment Eight
Except the north 305 feet, the east 100 feet of the west 1685 feet
of the SW 1/4 of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22 lying north of - -
Radatz Avenue. Also known as 1927 R.adatz Avenue
Except the north 305 feet, the east 140 feet of the west 1585
feet of that part of the SW 1/4 of Section 2, Township 29,
Range 22 lying north of Radatz Avenue
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COrT41 SS I ON
that the above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following
f ndi ngs -of -fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and
intent of the zoning code.
2. The roposed change will not substantial injure or detract from
the use of neighboring property or from - the character of the g
p neighborhoods
and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the pro-
posed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences
of the community, where appl icalbe, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change a would have no negative effect upon the 1 og i cal ,
if and economical extension of public services and facilities, such
as public water, sewers, police and fire . protection and schools.
•
Commissioner E 11 of son seconded Ayes- -Commi ssi oners fix:dahl, Barrett
El 1 efson, Hej ny, Pel 1 i sh, Robens, S1 etten , Whitcomb
/� /(,(/� %`A i // A ! �.'� �'` / { l_,.�-- ��d'..-- -�� - "� ^..�._ - -" ., : / �y' � -� Y� ^'��'°7 / '+.-' s �.. .- yid ,_"'• L � ^' ��
j / /; jam .✓
i
��j�� � � Fes V ����`r✓S / ,f" ��•"w'��r� / l �V �'-
;�.� �.�' ° Ly't '� �f l � �'� '� ,.t' -- s�`n.� r � �'? 'Y 'i�..r u r3' ` ! � � : ..-4 ° .s
s �=
(/ - � �"+I l .. m '" . 4 ^'����-� �. �wi ^ ['� � ` � = •$ .�.:.r'��_ ��t�` .!:.. -�..�N �� ��..: �y�� ����� �. �+�a: "�`J�
i � J r � � .d � `� q^'zacmx••t� {� .r. -r..n a'Y'
i� I�s -�✓� " ��- t �-�,:.•�. >�..�(� _r <� ',�„�- f �` e � :� '� -.,.- -r � � r �. -
'^2
s
X-
)&e
g' S.
t
ti
IJ�
f
I 1 l
a 0.
F
7
r
5 --J,
Commissioner Barrett. moved the P1 anni n C -
omm� ss i on forward the
foll owing resolution to the City Co
y uncil.
WHEREAS, .:Paul Sti ftner initiated a rezoning
R -2, residence district (double ng from F, farm residence to
dwelling) i ng) for the following-described
property;
The N 112 of the East 100 feet of the West t 320 feet of the NW 1/4 of
the NW 1/ 4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 2 Township 2 , Range 22, except
the North 33 fe thereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THEM P
tabove-described A LEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
that the
rezoning be approved on the basis of the following
findings-of-fac pp
1. The proposed change is consistent with
th the spir t, purpose and
intent of
the zoning code.
The proposed change will not substontiall - -- _- - -- d _ _ e - ' y �n�ure or tract from
the use of neighboring property from the char •
character of the neighborhood,
and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included '
posed change or plan i s ad ed �n the pro-
p adequately safeguarded.
0.... -= -•� / i� 4nr- Y•. .:. - - � �ltis+i' 4T'l�YIA
A �
3. ' The proposed change will serve the best
commun t � nterests and conveniences
of the
ni ty , where applicable, and the public welfare.
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council
Chambers in said City on the day of 1984 at 7 P.M*
The following members were P resent :
The following members were absent:
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F, farm
residence to LBC, limited business commercial for the following described
properties:
Except the north 505 feet and except the west 1685. feet, that part
of the SW 1/4 of Section 2 Township 29, Range 22 north of Radatz
Avenue and west of White Bear Avenue. Also known as 2829 White
Bear Avenue
Except the north 305 feet, the east 100 feet of the west 1685
feet of the SW 1/4 of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22 lying
north of Radatz Avenue. Also known as 1927 Radatz Avenue
585
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to
chapter 36, article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on
February 6, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council
that said rezoning be
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on v ' - ;z 7 -J�
to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant
to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be
heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports
and recommendations of the city staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the
above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings
of fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and
i rftent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or d tract from
the use of neighboring property or from the character of the ne'7
and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed
change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
0
Attachment 6
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences
of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The .proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such
as public water., sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
Adopted this day of 1984.
r
4} -
Seconded by Ayes- -
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. '
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD )
I the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the
City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared
the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the
City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1984, with the original on
file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript there-
from insofar as the same relates to this rezoning.
Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate -seal of the City this
day of 1984.
City Clerk
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
10
4. The proposed chan would have no ne effect upon the lo
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such
as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools,
Commissioner Heiny seconded A -- Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett,
El l efson , Hein Pellish, Robens, Sletten, Whitcomb
Pi // • _ � , ad /y ... ✓ _ ei� "�PV �GW�� 5.....%f'^y �La J � -44001
" / -
o
����� -� - �..�. ---n 6�- --�-'� '�;,,,;,��_ � �_.- �.�•�a- „�,,., �_ / - � �°°.,.�” "� � �'.,�,'L°. --� ��` ���' "i`. - :�7�- .�.^�" � fir' � y �,� : :,� =� � _ ,,�'.s ''�� �a,:•�e�'°--- ..� � ��
Al
/ X
/5` )
el"
ee
7,
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular ar meeti n of the City Council
9 9 y u ci]
+ of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council
Chambers in said City on the day of at 7 p.m.
a The following members were present:
The following members absent:
WHEREAS, Paul
Sti fter
initiated
a rezoning from F, farm residence to R -2,
residence district
(double
dwelling)
for the following-described property:
The N 112 of the East 100 feet of the West 320 feet of the NW 1/4 of
the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, except
the North 33 feet thereof.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1. This rezoning was initiated by Paul Sti fter, pursuant to chapter 36,
article VII of the Maplewood Code of ordinances.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on
February 6, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council
that said rezoning be
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on. 1984
to consider this rezone ng. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant
to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be
heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports
and recommendations of the city staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the
above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings
of fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and
intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from
the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood,
and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed
change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences
of the community,'
ommuni ty, ' where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such
as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
Adopted this day of 1984.
Seconded by Ayes-
6 Attachment 4
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of
the City of Maplewood, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared
the. attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the
City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1984, with the original
on f i l e in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript
therefrom insofar as the same relates to this zone change request.
Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this
day of 1984.
City Clerk
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
7
-' a
r
d
A P
' C � 6' .gyp. c " £.. � :6 •no�.edEf�%� w
_ Commi ss i over Pel i i sh moved the Planning Commission forward the fol 1 owi n
resolutions to the City Council
WHEREAS, Richard Miller i nti ated a rezoning from R -1, single dwelling
residential to R -2, double dwelling residential for the following-described
property:
Lot 15, Block 1, Roinestad's Thompson Park
This property is also known as the northwest corner of Fenton Avenue and
Jackson Street, Maplewood;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
that the above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following
f i ndi ngs -of -fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent
of the zoning .code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from
the use of the neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood,
and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included i n the proposed
change or plan is' adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences
of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and faci lities,
such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools, and
WHEREAS, Richard Miller applied for a variance for the following-
described property:
Lot 15, Block 1, Roi nestad' s Thompson Park
This property is also known as the northwest corner of Fenton Avenue and
Jackson Street, Maplewood;
WHEREAS, section 36 -70 of the Maplewood ewood Code of Ordinances requires
P
thirty feet as the minimum front setback;
z
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a front setback of twenty feet,
-requiring a variance of ten feet;
WHEREAS, section 36 -88 (c ) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires
=that the minimum lot width for a corner lot be at least 100 feet;
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a l width of 74.49 feet, requiring
a variance of 25.51 feet;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
e above-described variance be that th ap on the basis of the following
f i nd i ngs -of- fact:
1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship since no additional
land can be obtained from the lot to the north to increase the lot width.
2. The width of the lot is in character with other lots in the
neighborhood.
3. The building would line up with the house to the west.
4. The variance r' would be i n keeping n with the spirit and intent of the
a wo p 9
ordinance si nce the sight lines along Fenton Avenue and Jackson Street
would not be affected.
5. Council previously approved a l width and setback variance for
the house to the west.
Comm Sl ett e n seconded Ayes --Commi ssi oners Axdahl , Barrett,
El 1 efson, Hej ny., Pel 1 i sh, Robens , Sl etten, Whitcomb
s
it
/ T
It- .z
It 4 - ° �. _. 9? : +.Y'� -• > +i �' /f i'S:+.++'. /f _..'anar -o+ c' ! °" ..! r'3 -f' = f .,.. J4 I 1
�
WHEREA
S Richard Miller initiated a rezoning from R -1, single dwelling
residential to R -2,
double dwelling residential for the following descri bed
property
Lot 15, B1 ock. l , Roi nestad ` s Thompson Park
This property is also known as
the northwest corner of Fenton Avenue and
Jackson Street, Maplewood;
WHEREEAS, the P rocedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1 . Th ' rezoning was initiated by Richard Miller, pursuant to chapter 36
9
article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinance.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on
F ebruary 6 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the City
Council that said rezoning be
3.
The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing
1984 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and
mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given
an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Counci 1
al considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and
Pl anning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the
above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings-
-of fact
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent
of the zoning code.
The proposed change will no substantially i 'ure or detract from the use
s of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and
that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the pro -
posed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
i
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences
of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the 1 o 9 i cal
efficient, and economical extension of public services and
faci such as public water, sewers, police and fire P rotecti on
and schools. --
Lie—
_A�
�/V . � ��.+'" 4�- °'°a °�°�- „” " .- '��`5`'���'� .i� > `� ., �� , _ - .�. `:�•.� s "'�t- .r- �r��`� �-.. -� ��.�� �,. ,.. y �.: �� � ':'i¢p`c,.r'...�- .- ,^'€,. �,�.,� =r��- aRO�`'.,,�"'.'eF � �- ...- ..4SW.�`�6.. 'bs•f. -�,r °V«..
r
y r�
WHEREAS, Richard M i l l e r applied for a variance for the following - descri bed
P ro P ert • y•
Lot 15, Block 1, Roi nestad' s Thompson Park
IV
This property is also known as the northwest corner of Fenton Avenue and
Jackson: Street, Maplewood;
WHEREAS, section 36 -70 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires
thirty' feet as the minimum front setback;
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a front setback of twenty feet,
requiring a variance of ten feet;
WHEREAS, section 36 -88 (c) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires
that the minimum lot width for a corner lot be at least 100 feet;
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a l width of 74.49 feet, requiring
a variance of 25.51 feet;
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows:
I
I . This variance was applied for on Januar y 19 1984.
2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on
February 6, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the Cit
Council that said variance be
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on
1984 to consider this variance. Notice thereof was published and
mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were
given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The
Council also considered reports and recommendations f
z P o the ci staff
and Planning Commission.
- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAP LEWOOD I TY
C COUNCIL that the above -
descr variance be approved on the basis of the following fi ndi ngs-of -fact:
1. Strict en forc e me n t
would cause undue hardship since no additional land
can
be obtained from the l to the north to i ncrease the l width.
2. The wi dth of the l ot is in character with other lots in the neighborhood.
3. The building would l i n e up with the house to the west.
4. The
variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
ordinance since the sight l i-nes along Fenton Avenue and Jackson Street
would not be affected.
5. Council previously PP
approved a l width and setback variance for the
house to the west.
I
✓ a-°.i. ®° 1 ."d"�' vim ,- .... s'r 6r "''f> f s C `� _ . ..
er
_ r+ , "F s. r nF r of ., I7 t
IL
J i r
F I le
V f
Board Member Deans moved the Board recommend denial of the sign height
variances of five feet for the two proposed Cub Food Store pylons signs,
on the basis that:
1. There are not any physical characteristics unique to the property
which would cause an undue hardship if the code is complied with.
2. There is ample landscaped area in which the signs could be placed
at their proposed height and stil meet the required fifteen -foot
setback wothout loss of any parking spaces.
I Approval of a five -foot height variance for the proposed signs would
be contrary to the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Conforming
signs of 25 -feet tal would be easily visible from County Road B
and Rice Street at the proposed location at the property line.
Board Member Peterson seconded
Ile
Ayes - -all.
e • r ffis ,: r
ce ��
r
r '
- _%
�. `'� ��� ' ' 'l } �� . � Y � a 3i'�_ '�.. .r... -`�ur '•Yw,.�_"� � g-
ic
/`,y''�, _.. "Grp �,.•--- •-'• ..."'S�_.•... - 6/ / / ..� -- F.. .s �° ; /J�).. -� �.! W--. ,,Y ,�' "��' f �, e ���
,,., � ,.,,% Pi�9*�"" - ._..,..• -��� � y�'� r_''. �•.�8� � �'� G/ ✓�.�'�.,.�.e'....__ >"�� ._ s'',ys+..�-���........s,�i .� >€...m °� �� i�.�' ��. -�.� tl r
k
c '
t
t
.J y J � / y9 •
T ._ ��.�"'°" -'aa a� Fa:��.+•'� � - .T�....�......�n�� �. 1... � - ..��...,...,�.�.,.,...:...._,ov . a, t..._.... � .w »...s...... >,._.,..:.�a....�.
:1
j`
C l
a • d' '' r �"'�� � ..7 �'v f �«}' �... _, ,�`ya_.:�� . w,,••r. V ?_''• !•�fsy� �. �� ,='gip _..:tm. -..' ��
1-Z
/Z � r
J 5�;
±y�Y „�_
Commissioner Fischer mov th Pl anning_ Commiss forward the
following resolution to the ^City, Council•
WHEREAS, Loren Harrison apol i ed for a variance for the following-
described property:
The south 50 feet of the north 225 feet of part south of Lot 8, Block 4,
Gladstone Plat 3 of west 158 feet of SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 together with ex
sd west 158 feet and ex north 175 feet of south of sd lot 8 and ex
S 767 feet 5/100 feet part W of NP RY R/W of sd 1/4 1/4, all in
Section 15, Township 29, Range 22.
This property is a l s o known as 1950 English Street, Maplewood;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
that the above-described variance be approved on the basis of the following
findings-of-fact:
I. Denial would not serve a public purpose.
2. The request is cons i-stent with the spirit and intent of the zoning
code, in that, the structure would be compatible with existing
neighborhood dwellings and the floor plan would provide for adequate
living area .
3. The applicant would be caused a value hardship if required to
expand the proposed dwelling due to the unique age, style and
orientation of the existing dwellings in this neighborhood.
Commissioner S1 etten seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl ,
Fischer, Hejny, Pel 1 i sh, Prew, Robens Si gmundi k, S1 etten, Whitcomb
WHEREAS, Loren Harrison applied for a variance for the following- descri - bed
property:
The South 50 feet. of North 225 feet of part S of Lot 8, Block 4, Gladstone
Plat 3 of West 158 feet of SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 together with ex sd West 158
feet and ex No.rth 175 feet of S of sd Lot 8 and ex S 767 feet 56/100 feet part
W of NP RY R/W of sd 1/4 1/4, all in Section 15, Township 29, Range 22.
This property is also known as 1950 English Street, Maplewood;
WHEREAS, section 36 -67 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires 950
square feet as the minimum floor area for a one -story dwelling;
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing 896 square feet requiring a variance
of 54 square feet;
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows:
1. This variance was applied for on November 17, 1983.
' a
2• This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on M p
January 16, 1984.
The Planning Commission recommended to the City
Council that said variance be
• - is hearing on ��-��- -��
3. The Maplewood City Council held a publ 9 ,
• - Notice thereof was published i shed and • mai_
to cons led
consider this varai nce
at said hearing were-given an
to law. All persons present
pursuant . The Council
• d resent written statements.
z opportunity to be heard an p
also considered dered re P orts and recommendations of the city staff and
Planning Commission.
BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above -
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED f fact:
• described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings o
1.
AZ
Denial would not serve a public purpose.
• he spirit and intent of the zoning code,
Z. The request i s consistent stent w� th t
n that
• , the s would be compatible with existing neighborhood
�
fl oor l an would provi de for adequate living area.
dwell ings and the P _..
The applicant wou
1d be caused a value hardshi if require to expa
3, p
age,
style and orientation of
the proposed dwelling due to the unique the existing dwell.ings in this neighborhood. -
I
a yy�' 1�;`/ , ��:�''s -% � - '•��� -'� '�`' "� : >1 � , �` r� �° .,�'; ,a',,a* ..r f ,•� ..ttY�� �,r / '�_ �"��`.°!" ' ,+�,� ``��ko 1 '"°_!�' <�,w� 0 4`"
i
1 �d
- - � - G��......�,���'�•-- � -���f r- J�C��� ��C. - °-- �--�•- "�--�'. --�' `°� �..� !fir' �� °=�'� � _._. �...M� ,.,,� `�
ORDINANCE NO.
t/ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER -
OF THE MAP LEWOOD CITY CODE
«J
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section l:
Chapter. 11, Sections 1 ' through 12 is hereby amended to delete the word
preparedness where ever it appears in said sections and to insert in
lieu thereof, the word services.
Section 2:
This shall take effect upon adoption and publication.
Passed by the City Council of the City
of Maplewood, Minnesota, this.
day of 1984
(�; D_7
�J
gq SSS df:, p ydf
1 ry y'
�.d'� -✓f '.' ��,� -. S:,r�' f �' C.,n.d /� /��'ty,�3 -^ °6.. sue' j' ..�J ` fr�'''�r%°�rY� .....�,v � � ..<..: g?`,. -�.� � '" �- .��. x ::J"' ..: � •�a� ,.,e<,y� ° �
•:. �,,,, I fx�' i'��rs =n: - "�f �, eg' �!r^,<'F q % jiL"" . �' • � . ,..'. ' ' y e."""` i .r r`� ..
�S..Jr � '� '.��.., �` �'."` �. L�'•".. C. ..'� ✓'"`:� `{ _ i „' �� F c" 5w- " 'A1cs#
J
. � .,. if .. ._ -- .• --_._ ,_' .cam .�!'. t..,: _ r. '. t' �. :cuS,'�.,w . r �` / e%" r,r i `��a�..c+� _. ._,� � :;mot ���.��„*�, '..
.f"
T 4 C
9i(( O
p
�,..�° .,..�,,.,r_f- �?.�E'/fi . -� ...•',�` %' ....�P`?`-``..- .�.""''",/` `� 6+' F.,,..°'6'n.,�'"°",�,�., - ""ra' �+,R:.v • �.'` � �::+a.y'" d'..... E.�'+n_ -; e��^" ' t... - .- f+- .�,�:.- •*w-- .a�':"�•.
YJ
A m
r
� lc �iWE ,.I� My .3 D "� �.�F / -s 9 s �� _ � .'�r � - ���� ` c '�✓ � F °- � y / ��j3�»./
.r' ^ ,•- ,mi
!�
I
O t "'"`�� ✓.�� �' G»x-�` �'� ..,.� - '.,!r^:k._ -'a- -x '' f�. ^� , � ..,. .::,r.'��:^ r y.' �'":� y '�:;.- ��. aEmr
w
/p
� .tom �.:.... i y _ y __F ' :%F 1:� .ice_ it"tf _.:, l"' - -.... - __ � / ��' [Se�� ^"!c�..✓
,I lr
Commissioner Whitcomb moved the Planning Commission forward the following
resolution to the Ci �y Cournc1
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the Maplewood
Comprehensive Plan from RL, residential lower density to RH, residential
high density for the following described properties:
Lots 11 and 12, Block 2 and Lots 30 - 32, Block 5, City
Heights Addition, Section 18, Township 29, Range 22
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that
the above-described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following
f ndi ngs -of -fact:
1. The existing multiple and double dwellings are compatible with this
location and abutting properties.
2. The Land Use Plan must be amended to provide a clear statement of
the ci ty 's intentions to permit multiple and double dwel at this
location.
Commissioner Hejny seconded- - - - - -- Ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett,
El lefson, Hejny, Pel l ish, Robens, sletten, Whitcomb
fi
y
ss99
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the
Maplewood Comprehensive Plan from RL, residential lower density to
RH, residential high density for the following described preperti es :
Lots 1.1 and 12, Block 2 and Lots 30 -32, Block 5, City
Heights Addition, Section 18, Township 29, Range 22
s
This property is more commonly described as 145, 163 -165 and 177
Larpenteur Avenue.
WHEREAS, the proced
follows:
1. This plan amendment was i n,i ti ated by the .City of Maplewood.
2. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on
February 6, 1984 to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was
published and m a i l e d pursuant to law. All persons present at said
hearing were given an -opportunity to be heard and present written
statements.'' The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council
that said plan amendment be vlx�_-
3. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on
-P1 1984. The Council considered reports and recommendations
from the Planning Commission and city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that
the above - described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the
following findings of fact:
1. The existing multiple and double dwellings are compatible with
this location and abutting properties.
2. The Land Use Plan must be amended to provide a clear statement
of the City intentions to permit multiple and double dwellings at this
location.
Gs 6'" �.�.."y ° ��� �.a..r. �e�� "�,..'"'`��" "�C,°r+-' �_• �.,.�+'. -.. �j r" s'�` «;,;�''��_ �." arV�a'���+ -�
1 /12
Alz
ell
.��•• ""4. s .�,.»! k.9� i ! � � _ � � ��_ .� / gyp ,y /� -�" ,..�:,;,;:.'
y
/ Yf
f:'? .e +y,.✓ �s 1.
v
�f •rt' <f
0
�Z'
- O' x4
,.'.- ,- /// i• "'� ,a� fy ^ a"G. ..-Q iy°' -6,+" / /� /? h,.+°"""' ."' . «:y.N'v r,G� -,•. ;; .: ,.'d
- .- "'' £/C. � _.•'�'r .,1:,>•' ..._:,_ .,... �7" , f "+rte :� ... � , ��s� ..Y - °.,% ' . r .,�, <`� �.. � e e P"`- � ;_`"'.�.. ro -w� .. ae, f �- s.'•+ -r'a � f�9�
C .
- .� ..��,.•+"� r n ✓F S ��`.�� ws"'.'_ '= � yy 4"��lf y �"- mss'°.*"- ey�,c+�nsemA'F �F -=,�
_ ..! ='A ' � ".w'.{` �a ..:�e°":� z �..- "'i�' 9_•_.; - �F` �`dW'� ":'wi �"4+3:.x� ,.a:,:.x- .. °..�,:
{
f X4 .of
1. Establishment of a longevity plan plus inclusion of lower ranges in
starting steps on the same basis as recently approved for the AFSCME
locals. Again, it is a 10 %, two -year contract with the heavier cost
in the first year in order to implement the plan. The cost wi 11 be
6.6% in 1984 and 3.41 in 1985.
2. No changes in hospitalization contributions over the contract but
rather $20 per month in a deferred compensation plan.
3. Life insurance coverage increased from $10,000 to $20,000. (Cost
would be $43.20 per year per person.)
4. Mileage equivalent to that paid by the State, or 26� , whichever is
greater. (26� is being paid now by both us and the State.)
w m,
�'" �. ��- - J �� - --_`� = °' -� ��i" % %L- ���t.1- "�,;,� -r �.✓ ...,.> -�..� -ate
F y ,�
of
_lee-
- ��-✓ ��` � ,,�,�,�.� -� .__..�.�' :r� � �' ate_ -. , � ` ,�- �.�„ ,,,�,�`�... � �.: -�- '.�'�:
Pn'
J / .4 / s �i_ :Jy ''�'/ I ' "r�4.�✓ °J ''�� '� � '� �' "+ 'i.c'_'r.: ~ :1� '� �� >}'L:.:SM r _.
I
p ?, `�rtq+�kS�2� j _'.w'� a� � � `"". ,.�2��.m- � ..Y �' f •��� � �i � ��� �yL�� �� ..e .a < �� u � fr
ia.xenoaaax..,,. w a. ..._,........,�.a ........vw.......a.� —. �..�. _ ... ��. .. _.,.- .� - ._«Wei ` ._���a .�..�r......._..... .. •.c.. �
. r*`r _ 0od ;e e fY f �' •` �rc�+y y� y c' - n E: y F. _ . .z.r. -
r
} i
f/
r
Q-
Al
ell
F �f
,� o
!y -
>a„
1
�� �.....� .:.���° ='" ��t�` .i" ��� �°"'�� �' f� rte`" - �.�,,�.° '�'; - ���•���'� /.. �,�� .e= �k�..•i
"�"CS�' � -�. ! / '�.'" !/ .fC`/° R:ir...r� W � ..�b >n!'c � �� � � y '� ��/ 'r >�� //1^ CtiLa**'" Cow d�i�.uc""�....✓� O � �..w•✓
�..-' (.,,,, �� a"' � �. ! � .,.:� �� +�: .t�„+� � � �^ . .,- �-- r�•Y/q �� " � � i� . � =„� fir., �s tip �1 -... - �� yw;�..� -..� r ` ..�n..sa��
4•� � :t"'.' •, i•C .. n � n srra i .o, .,."`� ,,/- Y, �vY ,::.,. - -., a''..: x.. � - � `�` S� ",� - ".� •4 J '. "
� 4
f �
Fi '.' ,. ° . f'C.a�'',a'E'w '�.� "�'_ kzyaw'✓ I le
XF
1
G
�✓0�- ....r . ' '� `��e� ?ti... -•. "^'� "' :•.'� f ;✓.'`' _ '.3,•„✓ "��. - 'a% >- ...'- �Y._+,e' �,, , w ,._-ter. r -'��+- .�,- e�+•.a�",M•'aC.:...�-
s" L, 3 .y .+ + ice I �-- Ff ^' °° a �--^'a r�+' ? "off= ` . /L - -:? ✓�' .�
2 Y... ...
- 4 �.I��'°.^.r��'w..+--- '4.. - •✓ "as+r � ��6+Ni_. - � "�M.. - � %+L� //J} T `�� {.a"" r�jawr.��. - - .�.+.e � p/ .I�,,. / •nF _e,.+.' ��. �.. ���L.�+.e/''�)v<..s.+5...v.,��j Aa�'� a'!
- __ - ! n:...�� ..� �nu'a.-s69s �{ w�4 ��.. ^!b/'� �6' ` � � � �.s.�,p,�^�.
f
� n °~• ,� ems' _�" 1 ..�' �i';� �c � ,x,�' yam' y ' �`�,-• � „a"`�� s a" �4 . ->-' `.''_ .xfi�'
�/��' _ y _�..�y. .(� � � -�' " ��"y9' �,� � 3 r rye? r�.�r �, �F f �•..
/ / / //' < - G�- .�.'"""' "c""'a"._ ri... - - ^' -."' ._ :'� -_,�jy .,mss - -� rea.�. >:✓" . s, ' `ar'Y ' \'' itx� �•?_. j% ,.� `Y,J (' u�., .,"'�.. �e�' .r •�- ^"'••• ._.:.�:r _,d -A. } e
_ J
_/',7'y���I,� / .�.� %S„K � ,}�° �.r0✓ � �f, � "` ta�S�... C-_t� SV!�
�°"� �.. -- °--'ham � - .Y � E✓
i �
v
� a
�..vBY �t� mom'`. � ,f� � �, .sue >..-� ✓� �,/ � � �� _?�_' J G/ � >�
. ............
- "", �....- �- 'r~•.I�*."' �4. °�'`a..u,.�zgl�.<>.,aT�C --�' r,,�.,,sP ,C" ,�.,.� ..�„ .... �
'"- --�• -- Lam' G — �• - � .o O � — � -- � ����Oi---- -'��d'� ! � ;�� � @d -- "+.:..>"� � - -'
� � .r — �i" ` `�'�" e ���s' L �''�a.--•"'" `,� "���J �: °� � ��<.,.�,_�.�`.,:,.` ,�''� � ` �.� - :. - ' r�^'"�
' �...I�.�+^" `.�m.i °��""'T "��r - ��f"� £s�F.. 9 ,•�.� �^'_"_� C ". ....o - " F , ' f , ' Ji '; ...^� >.-- ....`.. �_.� .��. --�_. r,� � . - �fE �r9}
G R` °.- �,s�""'C �'� � (� 6S`•- ' ' '�� - �..�'��^'_s..'^" �vd L.���.°'"�+rr y.'�•� ,,�`s� . ^! � � t`, '���- "t''"�,.,>,>�_. -_ „� �✓j �
dR
.j f F '
� r
j .
�r
I 3
Count i 11nember Anderson introduced the foll resolution ut i on and � •
moved i s � adopt � on .
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -
STATE OF MINNESOTA 40
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
.r _.... _....__,_. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the proposed site for the Ramsey County Dump site was
defeated in 19
WHEREAS the Metropolitan Council resurrected the general site
for purposes of having another public hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of
Maplewood as follows:
1. Opposes the use of workhouse property as a proposed dump
site because of the following reasons;
a) The utilization of said site jeopardizes the health,
safety and welfare of Maplewood school children;
b) and. degrades property held by Peace
s
Lutheran Church;
c) violates PCA regulations of having a proposed dump
site to be 1000 feet from any residence -the proposed site is
less than 500 feet from the Ramsey County Workhouse;
d) Said proposed site would require reconstruction of
Century Avenue from 194 a distance of approximately 1 1/2
miles;
. ..,�.r ' r�- ...i•�i�x ... �i�tL�s1�N. X.It..siil.ci..�.Arf2y.:1.4W,�8 ..,,, .- ,>.' r�s '�' -fit.:
e) The cost of the said site would be approximate)
$12 to $14 million for a four year life expenditure which is
whole ly unrealistic .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the .City Council of the City of
Maplewood requests the Metropolitan Council to find that a public
hearing with respect to this matter is useless and that the site
immediatel -j.e f ound unsuitable
C
Dated this 27th day of February , 1984
Seconded by Counci lmember Maida.
ATTEST:
r
•
e
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Ayes -w all.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD RAr'!SEY COUNTY ,
MINNESOTA
By
B
its
F
City Attorney