The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1985 12-09 City Council PacketAMENDED AGENDA AGENDA Maplewood City Council 7:00 P.M., Monday, December 9, 1985 Municipal Administration Building Meeting 85 -27 (A) CALL TO ORDER (B) ROLL CALL (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES (D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA (E) CONSENT AGENDA 1. Accounts Payable 2. Interfund Transfers for Unassessed Utility Improvements 3. Increases on License Permit Fees and'Service Charqes 4. Budget Change - LOGIS 5. Transfer to Close Project 80 -5 6* Public Safety Dispatcher 7. Final. Plat: Cave's Cope Ave. Addition 8. Final Approval: Tax - Exempt Financing_Silver Ridge Apartments 9. Budget Transfer: Lift Stations 6 & 8 10. Temporary Mobile Home Permit Time Extension 11. Final Plat: Crestview 3rd Addition (F) PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 - Rezoning: Co. Rd. D. East of White Bear Ave. (4 votes) 2. 7:10 - Conditional Use Permit: Co. Rd. C (N.W. Bell) 3 7:20 - Conditional Use Permit: 2280 Stillwater Road 4, 7:30 - Code Amendment: Smaller Single Dwelling Lots (2nd'Reading)(4 Votes ) 5. 7:40 - PUD, Street and Alley Vacation, and Preliminary Plat: Cave's English Street Addition 6. 7:50 - Plan Amendment and Rezoning: McKnight Road (Daybridge Learning Center) (4 Votes)- (G) AWARD OF BIDS 1. Disposal of Police Vehicles (H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS (I) NEW BUSINESS 1. Code Amendment : .CNG &LPG Fac 1 i t i` es Ost Read i nq ) 2. Cope Ave. - English Street - Co .Rd .B Storm Sewer 3. City Council Rules .of Procedure 4. City Manager Contract (J) VISITOR PRESENTATION MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, November 25, 1985 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 85 -26 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W..Bastian, Councilmember Absent MaryLee Maida, Councilmember Present Charlotte Wasiluk, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL.OF MINUTES 1. Meeting No. 85 -23 (October 28, 1985) Councilmember Maida moved that the Minutes of Meeting No. 85 -23 (October 28, 19 8 5) be approved as submitted Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 2. Meeting No. 85 -24 (November 6, 1985) Councilmember Anderson moved that the Minutes of Meeting No. 85 -24 (November 6, 1985) be approved as submitted Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 3. Meeting No. 85 -25 (November 21, 1985) Councilmember Maida moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 85 -25 (November 21, 1985) as corrected Page 2 - 5. Add "Knowledge of Union Negotiations" Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. Frost Avenue 2. Maple Manor 3. Snow Plowing 4. Rules of Procedures 5. Hospitalization Insurance - Retirees 6. Maplewood Fire Fighters Benefit Association Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - al 1. 11/25 E. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Anderson moved, seconded by Councilmember Maida, Ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda Items 1 through 4 as recommended: 1. Accounts Payable Approved the -accounts (Part I,, Fees - Services - Expenses - Check Register dated November 12, 1985, and November 14, 1985 - $176,767.98: Part II, Payroll dated Novd.mber 15, 1985, in the gross amount of $121,985.62) in the amount of $298..753.60, 2. Project .85 -4, Reduction of Retainage Resolution No. 85 - 11 - 181 WHEREAS , the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project No. 85-4, Ripley Avenue Water Main, and has let a construction contract therefore pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS,, said project has been essentially completed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNE- SOTA, that the project is substantially complete and the retainage is hereby reduced to 2%. 3. Project 85 -9, Change Order Resolution No. 85 - 11 182 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, CITY COUNCIL that Change Order No. 1 for Project 85 -9, Renovation of Lift Stations 6 & 8 is approved and the City Engineer is directed to execute said Change Order No. 1. 4 Approval of On -Sale and Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses: Resolution No. 85 - 11 - 183 RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNE- SOTA, that the following On -Sale Liquor Licenses having been previously duly issued by this Council, are hereby approved for renewal for one year, effective January 1, 1986, with approval granted herein subject to satisfactory results of required Police, Fire and Health inspections. Bali Hai Restaurant 2305 White Bear Avenue Chalet Lounge & Restaurant 1820 Rice Street Keller Lake Lounge & Restaurant Hook N' Ladder 2280 Maplewood Drive Maple Wheel Lounge 2220 White Bear Avenue - 2 - 11/25 Chicone's Bar & Cafe, Inc. Maplewood Bowl, Ltd. K 2289 E. Minnehaha 1955 English Street Dean.' s , Inc. Mr. Steak 1986 Rice Street 1745 E. Cope Esteban's of Maplewood, Inc. M. T. Pockets 3069 White Bear Avenue 70 E. County Road B Fox & Hounds Northernaire Motel, Inc. 1734 Adolphus 2441 Highway 61 Garrity's Red Lobster 1696 White Bear Avenue 2925 White Bear Avenue Gulden' s Roadhouse Red Rooster 2999 N. Highway 61 2029 Woodlyn Holiday Inn of Maplewood Town Crier 1780 E. County Road D 1829 North St. Paul Road Maplewood Moose Lodge #963 Chuck E. Cheese's Pizza Time Theatre 1946 English Street _ 2950 White Bear Avenue (Club License) (Beer and Wine License) North Maplewood Lions Organization 1310 Frost Avenue (Club License) Resolution No. 85 - 11 - 184 RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNE- SOTA, that the following Off -Sale Liquor Licenses having been previously duly issued by this Council, are hereby approved for renewal for one year, effective January 1, 1986, with approvals granted herein subject to satisfactory results of required Police, Fire and Health inspections: J & R Liquors Party Time Liquors 2730 Stillwater Road 1740 Van Dyke Avenue JR's Maplewood Liquors Red Wagon Liquors 1347 Frost Avenue 2290 Maplewood Drive Labers Liquors Sarrack's International Wines & Spirits 1730 Rice Street 2305 Stillwater Road Maplewood Wine Cellar Spark Liquors 1231 Frost Avenue 3000 White Bear Avenue am 3 - 11/25 G. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Trucks a. Acting Manager Haider presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the followi g resolution and moved its adoption 85 - 11 - 185 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Merit Chevrolet, Inc., in the amount of $40,900.00 is the lowest responsible bid for the purchase of two 1 -ton cab and chassis and 1 -1/2 ton cab and chasis and an auto transmission for a 1 -1/2 ton cab and chassis and the proper City Officials are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None Mayor Greavu moved to discuss Item K, Council Presentations, at this time. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATION 1. Frost Avenue a. Councilmember Anderson requested an update of the proposed improvement of Frost Avenue. b. Acting Manager Haider stated Burlington Northern was sending a right -of- entry agreement. 2. Maple Manor a. Councilmember Anderson questioned if Staff had heard from Maple Manor regarding a drainage pipe. b. Acting Manager Haider stated a representative from Maple Manor had called stating they were hiring someone to clean the pipe. 3. Snow Plowing a. Councilmember Anderson questioned if other departments such as Park and Rec- reation can help with the snow plowing when the street department is short of help. b. Staff stated it is the practice of the City to utilize other departments. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:10 P.m., I.R.B. - Edina Realty 4 - 11/25 a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for, a public hearing regarding the request of Edina Realty for approval of a $l, 500, 000.00 Industrial Revenue Note for acquisition of land, construction of a 21,600 square foot office building on the east side of White Bear Avenue between Lydia and Beam Ave- nue. b. Acting Manager Haider presented the Staff report. c. Mr. Ron Peltier Edina Realty, spoke on behalf of the proposal. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Maida introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 85 - 11 - 186 RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL, OF THE PROJECT TO THE COMMISSIONER OF ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT WHEREAS, (a) On October 28 , 1985, this City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City ") , adopted a preliminary resolution (the "Earlier Preliminary Resolution ") with respect to a Project (as described therein) proposed by a Minnesota general partnership to be formed with Ron Peltier, Larry Davis and Richard Olson as the general partners (the "Company ") , in the context of notifying the Commissioner of Energy and Economic Develop- ment Authority (the "Commissioner ") of the City's intent to issue its com- mercial development revenue bonds for this Project; (b) The Earlier Preliminary Resolution set forth the purposes of the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (the "Act ") and the manner in which the Project satisfies and furthers such purposes; (c) The Company has proposed that the City assist in financing such Project through the issuance of a Revenue Bond or Bonds or a Revenue Note or Notes (hereinafter referred to in this resolution as "Revenue Bonds ") pursuant to the Act; (d) The Company is currently engaged in the business of real estate development; and the Project to be financed by the Revenue Bonds is an approximately 21,000 square foot office building to be located on the - 5 - 11/25 East side of White Bear Avenue between Lydia Avenue and Beam Avenue directly North of the Maplewood East Shopping Center in the City and consists of the acquisition of land and the construction of buildings and improvements thereon and the installation of equipment therein, all to be constructed pursuant to the Company's specifications and to be initially owned and operated by the Company to be leased to various parties (the "Project ") , and will result in the employment of additional persons to work within the new facilities; (e) The City has been advised by representatives of the Company that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital cost of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the Project would be signi- ficantly reduced, and the Company has also advised this Council that the Project would not be undertaken but for the availability of industrial development bond financing; (f) Pursuant to a resolution of the City Council adopted on October 28, 1985, a public hearing on the Project was held on November 25, 1985, after notice was published and materials made available for public in- spection at the City Hall, all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b, at which public hearing all those appearing who desired to speak were heard and written comments were accepted; and (g) Upon information and belief, no public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly benefit finan- cially from the Project: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. This Council hereby finds that no information presented at the hearing or since the adoption of the Earlier Preliminary Resolution has caused it to reject the Project or doubt the findings made in the Earlier Preliminary Resolution. The findings in the Earlier Prelimi- nary Resolution, and the preliminary approvals granted therein, are ratified and confirmed in full. 2. The Council hereby again gives preliminary approval to the proposal of the Company that the City undertake the Project pursuant to the Act and pursuant to a revenue agreement between the City and Company containing such terms and conditions (with provisions for re- vision from time to time as necessary) as may be necessary to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal of and interest on the Revenue Bonds in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $1,500,000 to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the acquisi- tion, construction and equipping of the Project. Said revenue agree- ment may also provide for the entire interest of the Company therein to be mortgaged to the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds. The City hereby again undertakes preliminarily to issue its Revenue Bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions. 3. On the basis of information available to this Council, it appears, and the Council hereby finds, that the Project constitutes properties, - 6 - 11/25 real and personal, used or useful in connection with one or more revenue producing enterprises engaged in any business within the meaning of Subdivision la of Section 474.02 of the Act; that the Project furthers the purposes stated in Section 474.01 of the Act; that the Project would not be undertaken but for the availability of industrial development bond financing under the Act and the willing- ness of the City to furnish such financing; and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the development of economi- cally sound industry and commerce, to assist in the prevention of the emergence of blighted and marginal land, to help prevent chronic unemploy- ment, to help the City retain and improve the tax base and to provide the range of service and employment opportunities required by the population, to help prevent the movement of talented and educated persons out of the State and to areas within the State where their services may not be as. effectively used, to promote more intensive development and use of land within the City, and eventually to increase the tax base of the community. 4. The Project is again hereby given preliminary approval by the City, again subject to the approval of the Project by the Commissioner or such other State officer having authority to grant approval, and again further subject to final approval by this Council, the Company, and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as t th _ulti _ details of the financing o_ fthe__ Project. 5. In accordance with Subdivision 7a of Section 474.01 of the Act, the Mayor or the Clerk of the City is hereby authorized and directed to submit the proposal for the Project to the Commissioner requesting his approval, and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide the Commissioner with such preliminary information as he may require. 6. The Company has agreed and it is again hereby determined that any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project, whether or not the Project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by the Commissioner, will be paid by the Company. 7. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, is again authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Project, to consult with the City Attorney, the Company and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms and provisions of the Revenue Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary docu- ments, and to submit such documents to the Council for final approval. 8. Nothing in this resolution or in the documents prepared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose. The Revenue Bonds shall not con- stitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or funds of the City except the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall the City be subject to any liability - 7 - 11/25 thereon. The holder of the Revenue Bonds shall never have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the outstanding principal of the Revenue Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City. The Reve- nue Bonds shall recite in substance that the Revenue Bonds, including interest thereon, are payable solely from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statu- tory limitation. 9. In anticipation of the approval by the Commissioner and the is- suance of the Revenue Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Project, and in anticipation that the City will procure and devote to the Revenue Bonds an adequate allocation of authority to issue private activity bonds (which allocation is not made hereby), and in order that completion of the Project will not be unduly delayed when approved, the Company is again hereby authorized to make such expenditures and advances toward payment of that portion of the costs of the Project to be financed from the pro- ceeds of the Revenue Bonds as the Company considers necessary, including the use of interim, short -term financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds if and when delivered but otherwid.e without liability on the part of the City. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewodd, Minnesota, this 25th day of November, 1985. Mayor Attest: Clerk Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS (Continued) 4. Rules of Procedures a. Tabled to .the December 9, 1985 Meeting. 5. Hospitalization - Retirees a. Councilmember Anderson questioned if employees who retire from the City are covered with medical insurance. b. Staff stated they were not. c. Council directed Staff to investigate the possibilities. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. 7:20 P.M.,. C and White Bear.Avenue Associates - 8 - 11/25 a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Gerald Mogren, C and White Bear Avenue Associates for approval of a $900,000.00 Industrial Revenue Note to construct a 21,000 square foot re- tail shopping center to be located at the northwest corner of the intersec- tion of County Road C and White Bear Avenue. .b. Acting Manager Haider presented the Staff report. C. Mr. Gerald Mogren, C and White Bear Avenue Associates, spoke on behalf of the proposal. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f . Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85 - 11 187 RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT TO THE COMMISSIONER OF ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT WHEREAS, (a) On October 28 1985, this City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "'City"), adopted a preliminary resolution (the "Earlier Preliminary Resolution ") with respect to a Project (as described therein) proposed by C and White Bear Avenue Associates, a Minnesota general part - nership to be formed with Gerald C. Mogren, as a general partner (the "Company ") , in the context of notifying the Commissioner of Energy and Economic Development Authority (the "Commissioner ") of the City's intent to issue its commercial development revenue bonds for this Project; (b) The Earlier Preliminary Resolution set forth the purposes of the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (the "Act ") and the manner in which the Project satisfies and furthers such purposes; (c) The Company has proposed that the City assist in financing such Project through the issuance of a Revenue Bond or Bonds or a Revenue Note or Notes (hereinafter referred to in this resolution as "Revenue Bonds ") pursuant to the Act; 9 - 11/25 (d) The Company is currently engaged in the business of real estate development; and the Project to be financed by the Revenue Bonds is an approximately 21,000 square foot retail shopping center to be located at the northwest corner of the intersection of County Road C and White Bear Avenue in the City and consists of the acquisition of land and the construction of buildings and improvements thereon and the installation of equipment therein, all to be constructed pursuant to the Company's specifications and to be initially owned and operated by the Company to be leased to various parties (the "Project ") , and will re- sult in the employment of additional persons to work within the new facilities; (e) The City has been advised by representatives of the Company that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital cost of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the Project would be signi- ficantly reduced, and the Company has also advised this Council that the Project would not be undertaken but for the availability of industrial development bond financing; (f) Pursuant to a resolution of the City Council adopted on October 28, 1985, a public hearing on the Project was held on November 25, 1985, after notice was published and materials made available for public in- spection at the City Hall, all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Sec- tion 474.01, Subdivision 7b, at which public hearing all those appearing I ho desired to speak were heard and written comments were accepted; and (g) Upon information and belief, no public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly benefit financially from the Project: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. This Council hereby finds that no information presented at the hearing or since the adoption of the Earlier Preliminary Resolution has caused it to reject the Project or doubt the findings made in the Earlier Preliminary Resolution. The findings in the Earlier Prelimi- nary Resolution, and the preliminary approvals granted therein, are ratified and confirmed in full. 2. The Council hereby again gives preliminary approval to the proposal of the Company that the City undertake the Project pursuant to the Act and pursuant to a revenue agreement between the City and Company containing such terms and conditions (with provisions for re- vision from time to time as necessary) as may be necessary to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal of and interest on the Revenue Bonds in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $900,000 to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project. Said revenue agreement may also provide for the entire interest of the Company therein to be mort- gaged to the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds. The City hereby again undertakes preliminarily to issue its Revenue Bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions. - 10 - 11/25 3. On the basis of information available to this Council, it appears, and the Council hereby finds, that the Project constitutes properties, real and personal, used or useful in connection with one or more revenue producing enterprises engaged in any business within the meaning of Subdivision la of Section 474.02 of the Act; that the Project furthers the purposes stated in Section 474.01 of the Act; that the Project would not be undertaken but for the availability of industrial development bond financing under the Act and the willing- ness of the City to furnish such financing; and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the development of economically sound industry and commerce, to assist in the prevention of the emergence of blighted and marginal land, to help prevent chronic unemployment, to help the City retain and improve the tax base and to provide the range of service and employment opportunities required by the population, to help prevent the movement of talented and educated persons out of the State and to areas within the State where their services may not be as effectively used, to promote more intensive development and use of land within the City, and eventually to in- crease the tax base of the community. 4. The Project is again hereby given preliminary approval by the City, again subject to the approval of the Project by the Commissioner or such other State officer having authority to grant approval, and again further subject to final approval by this Council, the Company, and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the ultimate details of the financing of the Project. 5. In accordance with Subdivision 7a of Section 474.01 of the Act, the Mayor or the Clerk of the City is hereby authorized and directed to submit the proposal for the Project to the Commissioner requesting his approval, and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide the Commissioner with such preliminary information as he may require. 6. The Company has agreed and it is again hereby determined that any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project, whether or not the Project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by the Commissioner, will be paid by the Company. 7. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, is again authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Project, to consult with the City Attorney, the Company and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the maturities, in- terest rates and other terms and provisions of the Revenue Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary documents, and to submit such documents to the Council for final approval. 8. Nothing in this resolution or in the documents prepared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose. The Revenue Bonds shall not con- stitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any - 11 - 11/25 property or funds of the City except the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall the City be subject to any liability thereon. The holder of the Revenue Bonds shall never have the , right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the outstand- ing principal of the Revenue Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City. The Revenue Bonds shall recite in substance that the Revenue Bonds, including interest thereon, are payable solely from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. 9. In anticipation of the approval by the Commissioner and the issuance of the Revenue Bonds to f inance all or a portion of the Project, and in anticipation that the City will procure and devote to the Revenue Bonds an adequate allocation of authority to issue private activity bonds (which allocation is not made hereby) , and in order that completion of the Project will not be unduly delayed when approved, the Company is again hereby author- ized to make such expenditures and advances toward payment of that portion of the costs of the Project to be financed from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds as the Company considers necessary, including the use of interim, short -term financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds if and when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the City. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this 25th day of November , 1985. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Seconded by Coun ci lmembe r Was i luk . Ayes - all. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS (Continued) 6. Maplewood Fire Fighters' Relief Association a. Mayor Greavu stated the Maplewood Fire Fighters' Relief Assocation is requesting a raise in the retirement benefits from $800.00 to $1,000.00 per year of service. b. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the increase in the retirement benefits of the Maplewood Fire Fighters' Relief Association from $800.00 to $1,000.00 p er year of service Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. - 12 - 11/25 I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Sign Permit : 3035 White Bear Avenue (The Tan Line) a. Director of Community Development Geoff Olson presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Maida moved to approve one 20 -day portable sign permit for the Tan Line for the remainder of 1985 and that the applicant must obtain the standard sign permit Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 2. Home Share Pilot Program a. Director of Community Development Olson presented the Staff report. b. Chairman Lorraine Fischer presented the Housing and Redevelopment Authority report. c. Councilmember Maida moved to approve the following 1. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the prepared Joint Powers Agreement for the Home Share Pilot Program. 2. Approve a transfer in the 1986 Budget of $160 from the contingency account to account 01- 4480 -09.. 3. Appoint Lorraine Fischer and Dale Carlson as the two representatives and an alternate of their, for each to , .serve �on the:;Home Share Program Steering Commission. 4. Authorize Maplewood to continue to supply the staffing for the Home Share Program Steering Commission. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued 3. 7:30 P.M., Variance : 2633 White Bear Avenue (Kenneth's) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Kenneth Gamboni , Kenneth's on White Bear, for approval of a 7.5 foot side yard setback variance for a free standing sign. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the Staff report. c. Board Member George Rossbach presented the Community Design Review Board report. d. Mr. Kenneth Gamboni, the applicant, spoke on behalf of his request. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f . Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. - 13 - 11/25 h. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85 - 11 - 188 WHEREAS, Kenneth R. Gamboni applied for a variance for the following - described property: Unplatted lands, the South 80 feet of the North 305 feet of that part of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, lying westerly of the West line.of White Bear Avenue as described in document 2202969 in Section 11, T. N29 R. N22. This property is also known as 2623 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood; WHEREAS, Section 36 -272 (b) (2) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires a ten foot side yard setback minimum for a freestanding sign; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a 2 1/2 foot setback, requiring a variance of 7 1/2 feet; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on October 8, 1985. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Community Design Review Board on October 22, 1985. The board recommended to the City Council that said variance be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on November 25th, 1985, to consider this variance. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at d.aid hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. Undue hardship would be caused the applicant if code was met since there is no other feasible location for the sign without conflicting with traffic flow or hindering the sign's visibility. 2. The spirit and intent of the ordinance would be met since there are no adjacent pylon signs on.the neighboring lot that would crowd the proposed sign. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. I. NEW BUSINESS (Continued) 3. Code Amendment : Small Lot Single Dwellings (1st Reading) - 14 - 11/25 a. Director of Community Development Olson presented the Staff report. b. Chairman Lorraine Fischer presented the Housing and Redevelopment Authority report. C. Commissioner Lorrraine Fischer presented the Planning Commission report. d. Councilmember Maida moved first reading of an ordinance to amend the Zoning code for small lot sin le dwelling roperties to 1. Reduce the minimum lot width requirement 2. Increase the minimum side yard area f or each lot. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) 4. 7:40 P.M., Tax Exempt Financing Harmony School Site a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a request of Smith Investment Properties for preliminary approval of a 6.5 million tax exempt mortgage revenue bond program to construct a 116 -unit senior housing complex. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the Staff report. C. Commissioner Lorraine Fischer presented the Planning Commission report. d. Mr. Tony Danna, representing the developers, spoke on behalf of the proposal.. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f . Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Councilmember Anderson moved to amend the housing bond plan to .include a $6.5 million tax exempt fin ancin2 program for the Harmony Seniors' Residence Project. Seconded by Councilmember Maida . Ayes - all. i. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85 - 11 - 189 - 15 - 11/25 RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A FINANCING PROGRAM FOR A MULTI - FAMILY RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT AND THE HOUSING PROGRAM, PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 4620, AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF MAPLEWD TO ISSUE HOUSING REVENUE BONDS AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF THE HOUSING PROGRAM FOR THE PROJECT FOR APPROVAL TO THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE SAID PROJECT AND PROGRAM (HARMONY SENIOR RESIDENCES PROJECT) WHEREAS, (a) Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C (.the "Act ") ' confers upon cities the power to issue revenue bonds to finance a program for the purposes of planning, administering, making or purchasing loans with respect to one or more multi - family housing developments within the boundaries of the City; (b) The City has received from ' Smith Investment Properties, a Minnesota general partnership with Bret M. Smith, N. Russell Smith and Norman P. Smith as the general partners (the "Developer"),, a pro- posal that the City undertake a program to finance a Project herein- after described through the issuance of revenue bonds or obligations (in one or more series or which may be in the form of a single debt in- strument) (the "Bonds ") pursuant to the Act; (c) The City desires to: facilitate the development of rental hous- ing within the community; encourage the development of affordable housing opportunities for residents of the City; encourage the development of housing facilities designed for occupancy by persons of low or moderate income; and encourage the development of blighted or underutilized land and structures within the boundaries of the City; and the Project will assist the City in achieving these objectives; (d) The Developer is engaged in the business of providing rental housing. The Project to be financed by the Bonds is the construction, renovation and equipping of two buildings, one containing approximately 52 rental units and anticipated to consist of all one - bedroom units, and the other building containing approximately 64 rental units and antici- pated to consist of 16 one - bedroom units and 48 two - bedroom units, loca- ted at the northeast corner of the intersection of White Bear Avenue and County Road C in the City, which will, result in the provision of addi- tional rental housing opportunities to persons within the community; - 16 - 11/25 (e) The City has been advised by the Developer that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital costs of the Project is avail- able only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the Project would be significantly reduced, but the Developer has also advised the City that with the aid of municipal financing, and resulting low .borrowing costs, the Project is economically more feasible; (f) A public hearing on the Project and the housing program was held on November 25, 1985, by the Maplewood City Council, after notice was pub- lished, all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 4620.05, subd. 5, at which public hearing all those appearing at said hearing who desired to speak were heard; (g) No public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly benefit financially from the Project; (h) The housing program has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for its review and comment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLE - WOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The City hereby gives preliminary approval to the proposal of the Developer that the City undertake the Project, described above, and the program of financing therefor, pursuant to Minne- sota Statutes, Chapter 462C, consisting of the construction , renovation and equipping of multi- family rental housing facili- ties within the City pursuant to the Developer's specifications and to a revenue agreement between the City and the Developer on such terms and conditions with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary, so as to produce income and revenues suf- ficient to pay, when due, the principal and interest on the Bonds in a total principal amount of approximately $6,500,000 to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the construction, renovation and equipping of the Project; and said agreement may also provide for the entire interest of the Developer there- in to be mortgaged to the purchaser or purchasers of the Bonds, or a trustee for the holder (s) of the Bonds; and the City hereby undertakes preliminarily to issue its bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions; 2. The housing program is hereby approved and adopted and the City Clerk is authorized and directed to submit the housing program to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency ("MHFA ") for its review; 3. At the option of the Developer, the financing may be structured so as to take advantage of whatever means are available and are permitted by law to enhance the security for, or marketability of, the Bonds; provided that any such financing structure must be ap- proved by the City; - 17 - 11/25 4 . On the basis of information available to the City, it appears, and the City hereby finds, that the Project constitutes a multi- family housing development within the meaning of subdivision 5 of Section 462C.02 of the Act; that the Project will be primarily occupied, in part, by persons of low or moderate income; that the availability of the financing under the Act and the willingness of the City to provide such financing will be a substantial inducement to the Developer to undertake the Project, and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the provision of additional multi- family rental housing opportunities to residents of the City, to assist in the prevention of the emergence of blighted and marginal land and to promote more intensive develop- ment and use of land within the City; 5. The Project, and the housing program to finance the Project by the issuance of revenue bonds, are hereby given preliminary approval by the City subject to the review of the housing program by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (the "MHFA ") and subject to final approval by the City, the Developer and the purchasers of the Bonds as to ultimate details of the financing of the Project; 6. In accordance with subdivision 5 of Section 462C. 05 , Minnesota Statutes, the Mayor of the City is hereby authorized and directed to submit the housing program for financing the Project to the MHFA, requesting its review, and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide the MHFA with preliminary information as it may require; 7. The Developer has agreed and it is hereby determined that 'any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project whether or not the Project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by MHFA will be paid by the Developer; 8. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, is authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Project and the housing program therefor, to consult with the City Attorney, the City's fiscal consultant, Developer and purchasers of the Bonds (or trustee for the purchasers of the Bonds) as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms and provisions of the Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary docu- ments and submit such documents to the City for final approval; 9. Nothing in this Resolution or the documents prepared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose. The Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien, or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or funds of the City except the revenues and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall the City be subject to any liability thereon. The holder or - 18 - 11/25 holders of the Bonds shall never have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the out- standing principal on the Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereon against any property of the City. The Bonds shall recite in substance that the Bonds, including the interest thereon, are payable,solely from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof. The Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any consti- tutional or statutory limitation; 10. In anticipation of the approval by the MHFA and the issuance of the Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Project, and in order that completion of theProj.ect will not be unduly delayed when approved, the Developer is hereby authorized to make such expenditures and advances toward payment of that portion of the costs of the Project to be financed from the proceeds of the Bonds, as the Developer considers necessary, including . the use of interim, short -term financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Bonds if any when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the City; 11. If construction of the Project is not started within one year from the date hereof, this resolution shall thereafter have no force and effect and the preliminary approval herein granted is withdrawn. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. I. NEW BUSINESS (Continued) 4. March of Dimes Super 400 Snowmobile Marathon a. Acting Manager Haider presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Maida moved to approve the route through Maplewood for the Super 400 March of Dimes Snowmobile Marathon as presented. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 5. Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District Nomination a. Acting Manager Haider presented the Staff report. b. Mayor Greavu moved to nominate Mar Lee Maida to the Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed D Board of Managers. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 6. Attorney Fee Structure a. Acting Manager Haider b. Mayor Greavu' moved to set the legal fees for the firm of Lais , Bannigan , and Kelly, City Att fo r - 1986 - as $60.00 an hour for budgeted items an �=U . 00 per hour for litigation matters. Seconded by Councilmember Maida Ayes - all. - 19 - 11/25 I I M Greavu moved to waive the Rules of Procedures and discuss Item J. at J. ayo r this time Seconded by Councilmember Maida. VISITOR PRESENTATION 1. Clyde Fish, Grant Realty Ayes - all. a. Mr. Fish stated the Members of Building Council is requesting that the P City Council update the density based on the 1970 Census to at least the 1980 Census* y b. Mayor Greavu moved to proceed in updating the density based on a current Census Seconded nded b Councilmember Was iluk . Ayes - all I. NEW BUSINESS (Continued) 7. December 23, 1985 Council Meeting a. Council stated the regular meeting will be held as scheduled December 23, 1985 8. Selection of City Manager Criteria a. Councilmember Maida moved to appoint City Attorney Donald Lais to the position of City Manager. b. Councilmember Anderson moved to table this discussion until the next meeting. Motion died for lack of a second. C. Mayor Greavu moved that Donald Lais be appointed as City Manager of Maplewood for the contract of four years. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Maida and Wasiluk. Councilmember Anderson abstained. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS None. M. ADJOURNMENT 8:49 P.M. City Clerk tlII i MANUAL CHECKS NOVEMBER 3 0 ,19 8 5 Page: 1 1965 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER HECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VEN002 ITEM UESCRI 312ib4 11/27/85 19000.00 EMP BENEFIT ELMS INS C LAIMS 19000.00 z'I 312955 11/27/85 130000 APP FEE 130.00 F: 4 312M59 11/27/85 59991.25 MINN STAT= TREAS E LIC_NSE 312MG9 11/27/85 324.00 MINN STAT. TREAS LICENSE 312r&o 11/27/85 129787.23 T t 3 EXCkVATING CONTRACT PY 3; ij 1900.2.48 F r 315655 11/27/85 40000 GOVT T1411ING TRAVEL TRAI � 40.00 31S420 11/27/85 1169876.11 METRO 44ST= CONTR CONTRACT PY 116 9 8 76.11 r z 3161468 31SM69 11/27/85 11/27/85 109700.00 MIA1N STAT= TREAS LICENSE 3161469 11/27/85 109779.25 MINN STATE TREAS LIC -NSE fj 3161469 11/27/85 400000 305.50 MINN MINN STAT= TREAS STAT= TREAS LICENSE r 3 22 9184.7 5 LICENSE �I 316NBO 11/27/85 39049055 N.S.3 UTILITIES - 39049.55 31780 11/27/85 120.46 NSP UTILITIES 120.46 317859 " 11/27/85 127.00 SAJi rA " R_STR PROGRAMS 127.00 � �•�tft ii 317A75 31TA75 11/27/85 11/27/85 2.35 A T A T T E L EPHONE L PHONE . 317AT5 11/27/85 3000 9054 A T A A T S T T TtLEPNOHE 317A75 11/27/85 1. 50 A T A T ttLEPNONE - # T`LEPHONE 16.99 t 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER HECK NO* DATE AMOUNT V =N002 ITEM DESCRIPT f 317N80 11/27/85 69677 *80 N *S*'* UTILITIES 69677.80 * 31SC40 11/27/85 89.50 CLERK )= :3JRT LICENSE PSL 89 *50 * 31SM20 11/27/85 589650 *00 METRO WASH CONTROL SAC P3L. 313M20 11/27/85 586 *50 - METRO dASt_ CONTROL SAC POL 58.063.50 313M69 11/27/85 79623 *20 MINN STAT= TREAS LICENSE 318M69 11/27/85 215 *00 MINN STAT= TREAS LICENSE 7 , p838 *20 313U65 11/27/85 85 *00 U1IV OF MIIN TRAVEL TRAINI 85 *00 319K20 11/27/85 145000 KANE ROSEMARY PIR DEDUCT 145 *00 319M69 11/27/85 7.882.64 MINN STAT= TREAS LIC =NSE 319M69 11/27/85 384000 MINN STAT= TREAS LICENSE 89 266* 64 319M76 11/27/85 7,345.58 MN St FREkS PERA PERA PBL 319M76 11/27/85 99833 *41 MN ST TREAS PERA P =RA PSL 17 319N80 11127/85 2.58 NSP UTILITIES 319N80 11/27/85 2.58 NSP UTILITIES 319N80 11/21/85 4.56 NSP UTILITIES 319NSD 11/27/85 144018 NSP UTILITIES 153 *90 322AO5 11/27/85 369.30 AFSCRr- UNION DUES PE ■ A m 10 1995 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD P,q c,3 CHECK REGISTER A40UNT fEV:)Ot ITEM DESCI 5.74 AFSCME UNION DUE 374.04 CHECK NO. DATE CITY CITY CR UN 322A05 11/27/85 29487.93 ICMA 694.40 t 322C35 11/27/85 413.55 M4 Br-4 -r IT ASSOC 413.55 t 4 322115 11/27/85 5 322I15 11/27/85 ft *fit MN MJTJAL INS 310.00 t 6s 375.07 NN ST COM1 /REYcNUE 322M35 11/27/85 44000 MN ST RETIREMENT 44.D0 � 10.101.50 MINN STAT= TR =AS 315.00 322M52 11/27/85 322M52 11/27/85 49123.07 MN ST TRE4S 89246.14 49000 RAMSY COUYT 48.00 322M61 11/27/85 ST PAJL DISPATCH 322M65 11/27/85 322MbB 11/27/85 322M59 11/27/85 322M69 11/27/85 322M70 11/27/85 322M70 11/27/85 322R10 11/27/85 323045 11/27/85 P,q c,3 CHECK REGISTER A40UNT fEV:)Ot ITEM DESCI 5.74 AFSCME UNION DUE 374.04 199407050 CITY CITY CR UN 199407.50 29487.93 ICMA 694.40 ICMA 39182.33 t 413.55 M4 Br-4 -r IT ASSOC 413.55 t 159- 038.47 FED- SAi - I N6S 237.50 MN FE3 =RA_ SAVNSS 159275.97 t 320.00 MN MJTJAL INS 310.00 t 6s 375.07 NN ST COM1 /REYcNUE 61375.07 t 44000 MN ST RETIREMENT 44.D0 � 10.101.50 MINN STAT= TR =AS 315.00 MINN STAT= TREAS 10.416.50 49123.07 My ST TREIS 49123.07 MN ST TRE4S 89246.14 49000 RAMSY COUYT 48.00 18000 ST PAJL DISPATCH e ; �{ 1945 CITY OF MAPLE Y000 � CHECK REGISTzR CHECK NO. PATE AMOUNT � lfENDOt ITEM DESC; 18.00 323M69 323M69 11/27/85 11/27/85 99588036 -MINN STATr TREAS LICENSE 323M69 11/27/8 5 246 o 316.0o 0 MINN STAT= TREAS LICENSE 109150.86 MINN STAT_ TREAS LICENSE 323N80 323N80 11/27/85 11/27/85 2.60 MSP UTILITIES 323NSO 11/27/85 3.80 2.60 NSP UTILITIES 323M80 323180 11 /27x85 482.14 MSP HSP UTILITIES 323N80 11/27/85 11/27/85 6051 380.64 NSP UTILITIES UTILITIES 878.2.9 t NSP UTILITIES 324A75 324A 75 11/27/85 3o 67 A T A T 324A75 11 /27! 85 11/27/85 3o&7 A T 3 T TELEPHONE TELEPHONE ' 324A75 11/27/85 .56 2.7g A T i A T I TELEPHONE 324A75 11127/85 32.70 s A T A T T TELEPHONE 324A75 324A75 11/27/85 7.89 A T A T c TELEPHONE 324A75 11/27/85 11/27/85 8.42 A T A T TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 324A75 11/27!85 •Sl 3.43 A T b A T d T T TELEPHONE 324A75 324A75 11/21185 17046 A T a T Tr _L.EPHONE 324 A 75 11/27/85 11/27/85 5.26 A T i T TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 324A75 11/27/85 4.4b 21.07 A T L T TELEPHONE 324A75 11/27/85 11.08 A T A A T T TEL EPHONE � 324A75 11/27/85 3.95 A A T A T T TELEPHONE 127.00 t TELEPHONE 324M69 11/2.7/85 5220.50 MINN StAT" T REAS 59220.50 * LICENSE 324N80 11/27/85 43.53 HSP 43.63 UTILITIES 324S83 11/27!85 4100 STATE. D= yll TREAS LIC FEE 44.00 325883 11/27/65 80000 SIN SOCIETr C.P.A { TRAVEL TRAIN AMOUNT 80000 160.00 102.00 102.00 698.62 698.62 99339o94 115.00 99 454.94 2289845.12 2289 &45.12 69$0l o64 365 *00 79166.64 5.25 5.25 r 83.75 83.75 t 72.50 72.50 r 5.25 3.00 s25 4.75 1.75 15.00 r CHECK RESISTER YEy302 ITEM DESCRI. MN SO :tETr C.P.A TRAVEL TRAM CLERIC OF COURT FREE -R; RONALD L FILING FEE VAC CK MINN STAT= TREAS MINN STAN TREAS KNUTSON CI_ySTR MINN STAT= TR =AS MINN. STAT= TREAS BRENVE1 RITA GETTY 3RP44 ALLEY 44YN =3 CHLEBECK JUDY CHLE3ECK JJDY CHLEBECK JUDY CHLF3ECK JUDY CHLEBECK JUDY LIC =NSE LICENSE CONTRACT PYM LICENSE LICENSE REFUND WAGES PT WAGES PT TRAVEL TRAINI' TRAVEL TRAINI' 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD TRAVEL HECK NO. DATE t 325883 11/27/85 325040 11/27/85 t 325F50 11/27/85 325 ?/27/85 325MG9 11/27/85 trfrrr 326K75 11/27/85 :rr>t+r t 326MS9 11/27/85 326469 11/27/85 trr>ert 329368 11/27/85 trrrrr 329481 11/27/85 329484 11/27/85 329C47 11/27/85 329C47 11/27/85 329C47 11/27/85 329047 11/27/85 32 9 -C 4 7 11/27/85 ter * : AMOUNT 80000 160.00 102.00 102.00 698.62 698.62 99339o94 115.00 99 454.94 2289845.12 2289 &45.12 69$0l o64 365 *00 79166.64 5.25 5.25 r 83.75 83.75 t 72.50 72.50 r 5.25 3.00 s25 4.75 1.75 15.00 r CHECK RESISTER YEy302 ITEM DESCRI. MN SO :tETr C.P.A TRAVEL TRAM CLERIC OF COURT FREE -R; RONALD L FILING FEE VAC CK MINN STAT= TREAS MINN STAN TREAS KNUTSON CI_ySTR MINN STAT= TR =AS MINN. STAT= TREAS BRENVE1 RITA GETTY 3RP44 ALLEY 44YN =3 CHLEBECK JUDY CHLE3ECK JJDY CHLEBECK JUDY CHLF3ECK JUDY CHLEBECK JUDY LIC =NSE LICENSE CONTRACT PYM LICENSE LICENSE REFUND WAGES PT WAGES PT TRAVEL TRAINI' TRAVEL TRAINI' TRAVEL TRAINI: TRAVEL TRAINI? TRAVEL TRAINI: 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO* DATE t 329MG9 11/27/85 329M69 11/27/85 227.00 MINN STAT= TREAS i 330238 11/27/85 728.00 MOUNDS PAZK ACADEMY 33ON55 11/27/85 330 11/27/85 330M69 11/27/85 330M71 11/27/85 330M71 11/27/85 330W58 11/27/85 99030.44 * 39460 *97 MN ST TRckS SURTAX SURTAX PBL 331 J05 f 11/27/85 SURTAX POL 39391.76 * 331M69 11/27/85 331M69 11/27/85 62.30 J C PENNY1 331M76 11/27/85 331"76 11/27/85 f MINN STAT= TREAS LICENSE P3L 169.00 ' 331 NRO 11/21/85 331N80 11/27/85 t 79164.10 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VE1001 ITEM DESCRIi 59039 *30 MINN STAT= TREAS LICENSE 227.00 MINN STAT= TREAS LICENSE 59266 *80 * 728.00 MOUNDS PAZK ACADEMY PROGRAMS 728.00 * 59.50 3 M CO SUPPLIES 59.50 * 8.768.44 MN STATE f3EAS LIC PBL 262.00 RN STATE IREAS LIC P3L 99030.44 * 39460 *97 MN ST TRckS SURTAX SURTAX PBL 69021 - MN ST T3EkS SURTAX SURTAX POL 39391.76 * 16.00 T YRIS4TS TRAVEL TRAI- 16 *00 62.30 J C PENNY1 PROGRAMS 62.30 * 6.627.75 MINN STAT= TREAS LICENSE P3L 169.00 MINN STAT = TREAS LICENSE PBL 69796* 75 * 79164.10 MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 99593.89 MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 1697 *99 * 82010 NSP UTILITIES 83.20 NSP UTILITIES 165.30 * f C t 1995 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK N09 DATE 331370 11/27/85 * * * * ** PA�e; 7 A 4OUNT 279787x50 279787.50 +� 246 382.14 2289845.12 129787.23 144807.79 249244.77 19000000 6589 387.51 "'HECK REGISTER V=MDot ITEM DESCRIPI ORR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT PYM FJND 01 TOTAL FUN] 03 TOTAL FUND 13 TOTAL FUND 56 TOTAL FUND 90 TOTAL FUND 92 TOTAL FU40 94 TOTAL GENERAL HYDRANT CHARD C.I.P. 85 -4 RIPLEY A SANITARY SEWE PAYROLL BEINEF DENTAL SELF -I TOTAL * NECESSARY EXPENDITURES SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETIN ACCOUNTS PAYABLE DECEMBER 09 page: 1 1395 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK M1. DATE AMOUNT YE#IO02 ITEM DESCRI 303004 11/26/85 36067 HEALT4 RESOURCES CONTRACT PY 343.04 11/26/85 75000 HEALT4 RESOURCES CONTRACT PY 343004 11/26/85 27.50 HEALTH RESDURCES CONTRACT PY ( 343004 11/26/85 50000 HEALT4 RESOURCES CONTRACT PY 343004 11/26/85 55.00 HEALTH RESOURCES CONTRACT PY 343004 11/26/85 82.50 HEALtd RESOURCES CONTRACT PY ( 343004 11126/85 935.00 HEALTH RESOURCES CONTRACT PY 343004 11/26/85 $2050 HEALF4 RESOURCES CONTRACT PY 343004 11/26/85 82.50 HEALTH RE30URCES CONTRACT PY 343004 11/26/85 75000 HEALTH RESDURCES CONTRACT PY 343004 11/26/85 50.00 HEALTi1 RESOURCES CONTRACT PY 343004 11/26/85 55.00 HEALTH RESOURCES CONTRACT PY 343004 11/26/85 55.90 HEALTH RESOURCES CONTRACT PY 343004 11/26/85 58.00 HEALTH RESOURCES CONTRACT PY 343004 8 11/26/85 27050 HEALTH RESOURCES CONTRACT PY 343004 11/26/85 27.50 HEALTi RESOURCES CONTRACT PY 343004 11/26/85 50..00 HEALTH RESOURCES CONTRACT PY 343004 11/26/85 25900 HEALTH RE3 DURCES CONTRACT PY 343004 11/26/85 27.50 HEALTH RESDURCES CONTRACT PY 343004 11/26/85 27050- HEALTH! RESOURCES CONTRACT PY 343004 11126/85 27.50 HEALTH RESOURCES CONTRACT PY 343004 11/26/85 25.00 HEALT4 RESDURCES CONTRACT PY 343004 11/26/85 25.00 HEALTH RESOURCES CONTRACT PY 343004 11/26/85 27.SO HEALTH! RESOURCES CONTRACT PY 343004 11/26/85 27.50 HEALTH RESOURCES CONTRACT PY 343004 11/26/85 27.50 HEALTH! RESOURCES CONTRACT PY 343004 11/26/85 50.00 HEALTH RE30URCES CONTRACT PT 343004 11/26/85 55.00 HEALTI RESOURCES CONTRACT PY 29106.ST 343024 11/26/85 10000 MINN JILD_IFE SUBSCRIPTIO 10.00 * 343940 11/26/85 37.00 BURKE AVA REFHO 37.90 * 343956 8 11126/85 89.36 ARTM4STER SUPPLIES 89.30 * 343062 11/26/85 6093 LINOLEOM 'VALES CD SUPPLIES 6.93 * 343125 11/26/85 175.00 CORPORATE RISK RAN- CONTRACT PY 175.00 343126 11/26/85 36.40 DON SKALM44 FIREARMS SUPPLIES AMOUNT 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 31 * X10 CHECK NO* DATE 256o55 256.55 * 11 *55 343215 11/26185 f **bar** * 343219 11/26185 177.90 * 343344 11/26185 12.00 24 *00 * 343356 11/26/85 343397 11/26/85 343483 11/26/85 343483 11/26/85 343610 11/26/85 f 343897 11/26/85 343908 11/26/85 343A02 11/26/85 343A02 11/26/85 343A02 11/26185 343A02 11/26185 AMOUNT 36.4 0 * 31 * X10 31.4 0 * 256o55 256.55 * 11 *55 11.55 * 66.55 66 *55 * 177.90 177.90 * 12.00 12.00 24 *00 * 20 *00 20.0 0 * 35 *00 35e99 * 7.20 7.20 12.26 12.26 12 *26- 12.26 24 *S2 CHECK REGISTER YEy002 ITEM DESCRIPT: SPARTAN S':CIALTIES SUPPLIES NORTH "Exr3AL CONSTR SUPPLIES NATL YILD.IFE FED BOOKS LEONAR) IwC A4 SUPPLIES MINN 3£ARI VG CD SUPPLIES A -1 3:JStN =SS SERVICE SUPPLIES A -1 31JSIN:SS SERVICE SUPPLIES HELEr ROL4ND RANI CK JOHN TURN344) 34EM34 ACRO —MINN ACRO —MILAN ACRO —MINN ACRD —MI NN SAFTY SHOES CANINE ALLOWAA MILEAGE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PA e 1945 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CIECK N0. D ATE AMOUNT 6EN301 ITEM DESCRIPTI 343A52 11!26185 81.75 AIDEV S401 -VIEW 40 CANINE EXAM � 81.75 � 343A55 11/26/85 31.23 ANERI -OAT4 SYSTEM ANERI -©AT4 SYSTEM SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 343A55 11/26/85 80000 380000 AMERI-DAT4 SYSTEM SUPPLIES 343A55 11/26/85 491.23 + � 34 3 A 69 11/26/85 10.45 678.53 ARNALS AUTD SERV ARNALS AU[D S :RV REPAIR MAINT ` REPAI 3 43A59 11/26/85 11/26/85 136.53 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAI R MAINT 343A69 11/26185 45066 ARNALS AUTO s NA NT , REPAIR I � 43 b9 3 a 871.17 343B15 11/26/85 41038 BATTERf TIME W4SE BATTEIr TIIE YHSE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES � 343315 11/26/8 -5 14051 19032 BATTERY TIRE WHSE SUPPLI 343815 11/26/85 TS.ti � 34 3 831 11/26/85 113.32 BLUE 4E ON BOOKS%OOP SUPPLIES 113.32 3I3B45 / 6/85 it 2 26.2 B0AR3 OF DATER COMM BOARD OF DATER COMM UTILITIES UTILITIES � 345845 11/26/85 12.12 1.42 BOARD OF DATER COMM UTILITIES 3 8 45 11/26/85 11/25/85 12.12 BOARD OF DATER COMM UTILITI 34 3 8i►S 3439 45 11!26/85 79.30 BOARD OF DATER COM.M OF JA TER CONM UTILITIES CONTRACT 3438 45 11./26/85 19760.00 BOARD 19897.68 343s55 11/2 6/85 49070 BROVI 'HOT 0 SUPPLIES . 49070 t 343C33 11/26/85 101.29 CAPIT3L'SJPPLY SUPPLIES 101.29 343C 38 11/26/85 49.30 CLEAN STE* RUGS RUG CLEANING 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGIST =R CHECK MO* DATE AMOUNT VEND01 ITEM DESCRIPT 343C38 11/26185 50.3• CLEAN STED ROSS RUG CLEANING 99.6• * 343C51 11/26/85 30 *00009 CSM 4floplaRp REFUND 30.00loOO * 343C55 11/26/85 199 *50 COPY DJPLICATIVS DUPLICATING C 199* 50 * 343CSS 11/26/85 2.467 *32 COLLIMS E. =CTRIC SUPPLIES 29467 *32 * 343C58 11/26/85 25.10 COPT Eaull"ENr INC SUPPLIES 343C58 343C58 11/26/85 11/26/85 7 *65 COPY COUIXRENT INC SUPPLIES 343C58 11/26/85 2.90— 78000 COPY ENUIIMENT INC 7 OU1 2 MENT SUPPLIES 343C59 11/26/85 42 *00 COPT INC COPY EOUI'MENT INC SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 343C58 11/26/85 11067 COPY EIul INC SUPPLIES 161 *52 34SD37 11/26/85 25 *00 DATA DISP4TCHING CONTRACT PYN 25 *00 * 343D60 11/26/85 5.72 DOHEITr K4THLEEN MILEAGE 5o72 * 343070 11/26/85 109 *50 DON STREI HER SUNS SUPPLIES 109 *50 343EO7 343E07 11/26/85 11/26/85 13 *13 EASTMAN K))AK CO DUPLICATING CO 343EO7 11/26/85 26.22 65.56 EASTMAM K)DAK CO EASTMAN MAK CO DUPLICATING CO 343..07 11/26/85 327* 81 EASTMAN K) 3AK :D DUPLICATING CO DUPLICATING CO 343E07 343E 07 11/26/85 11/26185 262 *25 13.11 EASTMAN K))AK CO DUPLICATING CO 343EO7 11/26/85 445 *82 EAST MA V K) )AK CO EASTMAN K33AK CO DUPLICATING CO 343EO7 11/26/85 157 *35 EASTMAN K)3AK CO DUPLICATING CO DUPLICATING CO 1 *25 343FO5 11/26/85 8 *00 FAUST 94MI EL TRAVEL TRAININ P A e 5 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VE9004 ITEM DESCRIPTI 5020 FAUST DANIEL MILEAGE 13.20 * 89.66 1995 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD E 360.00 CHECK N.0. DATE t 343F85 11/26/85 101071 GOODYEAR TIRE CO 343FI S 11/26/85 CO 9.47 GOODYEAR TIRE CO 59.16 GOODYEAR TIRE CO 115.96 5a0DYE6R TIRE CO 343623 11126185 CO 343623 11/26/85 i 156.66 GOODYEAR TIRE CO 6050 GOODYEAR TIRE CO 760.40 343545 11/26/85 343645 11/26/85 343645 11/26/85 343645 11/26/85 95.55 * 343645 11/26/85 156.66 343645 11/26/85 1 56066- 3 11/26/85 .00 * 34 3 G4 5 11/26/85 1.050.00 343x45 11/26/85 19050.00 * 343645 11/26/85 343646 11/26/85 343649 11/26/85 343656 11/26/85 343656 11/26/85 343657 11/26/85 34 3HO I :: 11/26185 f *** * ** 343185 11/26/85 P A e 5 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VE9004 ITEM DESCRIPTI 5020 FAUST DANIEL MILEAGE 13.20 * 89.66 FAST.rl%IT 89.66 * 360.00 6000 IIALU= HOMES 234o00 GOOD VALU= HOMES S94.A0 * 101071 GOODYEAR TIRE CO 92.16 6000YEAR TIRE CO 9.47 GOODYEAR TIRE CO 59.16 GOODYEAR TIRE CO 115.96 5a0DYE6R TIRE CO 102.62 GOODYEAR TIRE CO 86016 GOODYEAR TIRE CO 156.66 GOODYEAR TIRE CO 6050 GOODYEAR TIRE CO 760.40 40.76 GENJIME P%RTS 45000 GENUINE P4RTS 85o76 95.55 60PHER 3E44ING CD 95.55 * 156.66 G ©VT TR411IMG SERV 1 56066- GOVT TR411ING SERV .00 * 1.050.00 GRAC= 3JAy= C 19050.00 * SUPPLIES REFUND REFUND REPAIR MAINT REPAIR MAINT REPAIR MAINT REPAIR MAINT REPAIR MAINT REPAIR MAINT REPAIR !RAINY SUPPLIES REPAIR RAINY SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REPAIR MAINT SUPPLIES CONSULTING IN: 13.85 NA —L3 ADV= 4TISING CO SUPPLIES 13.85 180000 I NTL 4 9SN OF 180.tA SUBSCRIPTION ,OA e'� t 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK N0• DATE AMOUNT YENDOt ITEM DESCRI 3 5i 11/26/85 686050 J THDRAS 4THLECTICS SUPPLIES 343J50 11/26/85 1.5 *90 J TAOMAS 4FOLECTICS SUPPLIES 791.50 * :t *mot: 345L02 11/26/85 39.31 L ARSEN MAIIA M ILEAGE 39.31 * 343L16 11/26185 2910+ *DO LAIS 34INISAN KLr CONTRACT PTP 34306 11/26/85 180000 LAIS BANXISAN KLT CONTRACT PYP 343L16 11/26185 67.50 LAIS BANNIGAN KLY CONTRACT PY! 29 351.50 343L21 11/26/85 338.28 LAKELAKD =DRD REPAIR MAINT 338.28 * 343L28 11/26/85 3500 LANG RICHARD CANINE ALLOW 35.0 0 * 343L70 11/26/85 1.644.53 L06IS Dp SERVICES 34SLIO 11/26/85 28016 LOGIS OP SERVICES 1.672.69 * 343M48 11/26/85 19952 *60 METRO I*Sz SERVICE CONTRACT PYM 19 952.5 • * 343M50 11/26/85 150000 MN Dmrr R= SISTRAR SUPPLIES 150.00 3431486 1!/26/85 240.00 M06REN 3R33 SUPPLIES 343MB6 11/26/85 150.00 M06REN SR)S SUPPLIES 343MB6 11/26/85 200000 N36R N 3R)S SUPPLIES 343MB6 11/26/85 240.8 • MOSREN 9R) S SUPPLIES 830.•• � 3431494 11/26/85 19222* 53 N.R. SI GH SUPPLIES 19222.53 AMOUNT 4 470 4470 * 77035 77.35 880499 3* 96 3 *86 2*is2 19128 *55 138 *92 94* 90 68 *07 37.38 6 *610 *04 91 *74 133 *60 141.74 138* 03 103 *12 75.76 4.64 4 *64 13.85 58.2 7 27 *40 27.4 0 15 *58 49* 73 34.45 45.19 900113 18.32 379 *06 83 *72 104504070 * 432.40 432440 11 *25 11 *t5 PAOe : 7 �HE�K REGISTER 0EN301 ITEM DESCRIPTIi MATL RESOJ4CES NORT4 ST b4UL *ITT BOOKS UTILITIES M. S. p * MOS. N.S.P. MOSS N. S.?. Nosop* M*S*p* 1M.S*p* No S* 30 N o S* J N.S.P. Nose** m* $• p* N* S* p N*S *p* N*S *pa N•S*p N *S* M * N *S * No se low Il*S.p NoS.*;b* N S♦ a N* S* p * IM*S*P* N *S* �* N*S.p* N*S*p* N*S *p* N*S*a'* ORCHESTRA HALL OLSON SEO= UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILI TIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES PROGRAMS Travel Trainin: 1985 CITY OF MAPL "'HECK NO* DATE i 343403 11/25/85 343N30 11/25/85 343M88 11/26/85 343N80 11/26185 343N80 11/26/85 343180 11/26/85 343180 11/26/85 343N80 11/26/85 343480 11/26/85 343N80 11/26/85 343480 11/26/85 343N80 11/26/85 343N80 11/26/85 343H80 11/26/85 343MBS 11/26/85 343N80 11/26/85 343480 11/26/85 343H80 11/26/85 343498 11126/85 { 343N80 11/26/85 343NSO 11/26/85 343NSO 11/26/85 343189 11/26/85 34SN80 11/26/85 343NSO 11/26/85 ( 343H80 11/26/85 343M88 11/26/85 343N80 11/26/85 343NB0 11/26/85 343N80 11/26/85 343M80 11/26185 343488 11/26/85 c 343045 ;; 11/25/85 . 343050 11/26/85 :5. C AMOUNT 4 470 4470 * 77035 77.35 880499 3* 96 3 *86 2*is2 19128 *55 138 *92 94* 90 68 *07 37.38 6 *610 *04 91 *74 133 *60 141.74 138* 03 103 *12 75.76 4.64 4 *64 13.85 58.2 7 27 *40 27.4 0 15 *58 49* 73 34.45 45.19 900113 18.32 379 *06 83 *72 104504070 * 432.40 432440 11 *25 11 *t5 PAOe : 7 �HE�K REGISTER 0EN301 ITEM DESCRIPTIi MATL RESOJ4CES NORT4 ST b4UL *ITT BOOKS UTILITIES M. S. p * MOS. N.S.P. MOSS N. S.?. Nosop* M*S*p* 1M.S*p* No S* 30 N o S* J N.S.P. Nose** m* $• p* N* S* p N*S *p* N*S *pa N•S*p N *S* M * N *S * No se low Il*S.p NoS.*;b* N S♦ a N* S* p * IM*S*P* N *S* �* N*S.p* N*S*p* N*S *p* N*S*a'* ORCHESTRA HALL OLSON SEO= UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILI TIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES PROGRAMS Travel Trainin: M5 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD VEN301 ITEM DESCRIPTI 20.00 OVENS CHECK M0. DATE 250.29 PHOTOS TO SO 343097 11/25/85 PHOTOS TO 60 SUPPLIES 17034 PHOTOS TO SO SUPPLIES 47.82 343P40 11/25/85 PITNEY BODES 343P40 31/25/65 343P40 11/25185 POSTMASTE4 POSTAGE 525.0 0 1450 POYEI 31ACE EQUIP 343P45 11/25/85 75.00 PROT= CT -ALIE SUPPLIES 75.00 3f►3P50 11/25/85 RAMSEY COJNTr JOINT AGREEME 29870.41 RAMSEY COUNTY 343P58 11/25/85 RAMSEY COUNTY CONTRACT PYM 4�501.7T 655.90 REEDS SAL:.S SERVICE SUPPLIES 655.98 343Pb6 11/25/85 ROAD ZESCJE SUPPLIES VEN 92.95 ROAD RESCJE SUPPLIES WEN 195.00 ROAD RESCJE 343809 11/25/85 ROAD %EtSCJE 343R 09 11/25/85 ROAD RESCJE 343R09 11/25/85 ROAD RESCJ� SUPPLIES 596. T 5 4.40 S L 3 L'OCC SAFE SUPPLIES 343R27 11/25/85 343R49 11/25/85 34SR49 11/25/85 343R49 11/25/85 343849 11/25/85 343R49 11/26/85 343R49 11/26/85 t 343SO2 11/25!85 ;HECK REGISTER A40UNT VEN301 ITEM DESCRIPTI 20.00 OVENS SAFETY SHOES 200011 ! 250.29 PHOTOS TO SO SUPPLIES 5019 PHOTOS TO 60 SUPPLIES 17034 PHOTOS TO SO SUPPLIES 47.82 74008 PITNEY BODES LEASE 74.00 52500 POSTMASTE4 POSTAGE 525.0 0 1450 POYEI 31ACE EQUIP SUPPLIES 14.80 75.00 PROT= CT -ALIE SUPPLIES 75.00 1.627.50 RAMSEY COJNTr JOINT AGREEME 29870.41 RAMSEY COUNTY JOINT ASREEME 3086 RAMSEY COUNTY CONTRACT PYM 4�501.7T 655.90 REEDS SAL:.S SERVICE SUPPLIES 655.98 51.98 ROAD ZESCJE SUPPLIES VEN 92.95 ROAD RESCJE SUPPLIES WEN 195.00 ROAD RESCJE REPAIR VEVEN li.8o ROAD %EtSCJE SUPPLIES 15.50 ROAD RESCJE SUPPLIES 229.52 ROAD RESCJ� SUPPLIES 596. T 5 4.40 S L 3 L'OCC SAFE SUPPLIES CITY OF MAPL�EW003 CHECK REGISTER CHECK N0. OATE A40UNT #"--' 1301 ITEM DESCRIPTION 4.4 0 343503 11/25/85 34.68 SPS OFF- C= PROD SUPPLIES 34.68 • dr 343S05 11/2S/SS 51.32 S t T OFFICE SUPPLIES 343S05 11/25/85 18023 S 9 T OFFICE SUPPLIES 343S05 11/25/85 58.20- S L T OFFICE SUPPLIES 343SO5 11/25/85 16092 S 8 T 3FFICE SUPPLIES 343S05 11/25/85 10084- S i T OFFICE SUPPLIES 343SO5 11/25/85 66.07 S 9 T OFFICE SUPPLIES 343505 11/25/85 41.58 S 9 T OFFICE SUPPLIES 343505 11/25/85 28.04 S S T OFFICE SUPPLIES 343505 11/25/85 1 * 84 S 6 T OFFI: E SUPPLIES 343SO5 11/25185 7684- S 9 T OFFICE SUPPLIES 343S05 11/25/85 4000- S 6 T D=FICE SUPPLIES 343SO5 11/25/85 8060 S 5 T OFFICE SUPPLIES 343SO5 11/25/85 10078 S 8 T OFFICE SUPPLIES 343S05 11/25/85 1084 S A T OFFICE SUPPLIES 343S05 11/25/85 7 *20- S S T 3FFICE SUPPLIES 343S05 11/25/85 9076- S t T OFFICE SUPPLIES 343505 11/23/85 13.60- S i T OFFICE SUPPLIES 133.74 343S30 11/25/85 7*97 SEAMS 88412 SUPPLIES 7.97 .t. 343S33 11/25/85 381015 SELF :T SEZ VICE PROGRAMS 343S33 11/25/85 661.21 SELF :T SEIVICE PROGRAMS i * 542.36 4 343S47 11/25/85 29415.30 SOIL = 1 Co CONTRACT PYM 29415 *30 *• *t* 343S50 11/25/85 3 *94 SPECIAL Iii 916 TUITION 3.94 * 343S82 11/26/85 665.12 STATE OF 19 DOT SUPPLIES 665.12 * 343T29 11/25/85 828.•! T.A.SCAIFs[Y SONS REPAIR MAINT PA to to 1185 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER f. C4ECK N0. DATE AMOUNT YEM00Z ITEM DESCRIPTION 343729 11/25/85 81059 T.A•SCHIFSKY SONS REPAIR MAINT 9 09.59 f irt! *tir 343T50 11 /2g /a5 56010 T J 4Jf9 'ARTS SUPPLIES ' 56.10 343TSO 11/2S/85 267.66 TRUCK WTI.. ITIES MFG REPAIR MAINT VEH 267.66 343050 11/25/85 34015 UNIF31RS JMLIMITED UNIFORMS 343U50 11/25185 16015 UNIFORMS JNLIMITED UNIFORMS 343U50 11/25/85 12060 UNIFORMS JMLIMITED UNIFORMS 343050 11/25/85 30015 UNIFOR0 JULIMITED UNIFORMS 343U50 11/25/85 48010 UNIFORMS JULIMITED UNIFORMS 343U50 14/25/85 28.66 UNIFORMS JNLIMITED UNIFORMS 343J50 11/25/85 97065 UNIF9g4S JULIMITED UNIFORMS 343050 11/25/85 113000 UNIFORMS JNLIMITED UNIFORMS 343U50 11/25/85 89096 UXIF3RRS JILIMITEO UNIFORMS 343U50 11/25/85 450000 UNIFOR IS JMLIMI TED UNIFORMS 3431)50 11/25/85 89095 UNIFORMS JNLIMITED UNIFORMS 343050 11/25/85 15.75 UNIFORMS JMLIMITED UNIFORMS 343050 11/25/85 27.15 UNIFORMS JNLIMITED UNIFORMS 343050 11/25/85 44.92 UNIFORMS JULIMITED UNIFORMS 1.048.19 343UT9 11/25/85 44.95 UNITE) ST3RES UNIFORMS 44.95 * 343V22 11/25/85 27.00 WASKO RUB3ISH REMOV RJOBISH REMOVAL 27.00 * 343Y21 11/25185 6.72 VARNEtS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 343W21 11/25/85 49.73 VARNE%S T IVE VALU SUPPLIES j 343M21 11/25/85 21089 VARNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 78.3 4 343W22 11/25/85 252.45 WARNER IN) SUPLr SUPPLIES 252.45 34SW35 11/25/85 54.95 YIZAR3 MAIKETING SUPPLIES 54.95 pAa e. // 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD c CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT e CHECK REGISTER VEN301 ITEM DESCRIPTIO1 343Y50 11/26/85 87000 WESER- t103ETH INC 397.38 FUND 87.00 TOTAL 180000 FU13 47 TOTAL 29482.80 FUND 343Y74 11/26/85 18.15 WILL144S )JANE J 73 TOTAL 18.15 : FUNS 76 TOTAL 811.61 FUND 90 TOTAL 343X39 11/25/85 95.19 XEROX C3R2 343X39 11/25/85 95019 XEROX CORD 190 038 *f� :mot 343158 11/25/85 79110000 YOCUM OIL 343Y50 11/25/85 79822.50 YOCUM 31L 343T59 11/25/85 7ip 822.50 YOCUM OIL 343150 11/25/85 79126.00 YOCUM OIL 343150 11/25/85 69660.90 YOCJM OIL 369541004 t 7111549.07 FU13 01 TOTAL 397.38 FUND 03 TOTAL 180000 FU13 47 TOTAL 29482.80 FUND 67 TOTAL 19760.00 FUID 73 TOTAL 3.86 FUNS 76 TOTAL 811.61 FUND 90 TOTAL 379674.15 FUND 96 TOTAL 1149858.87 TOTAL INDI CATER ITEM 1S F'I' ANCED BY RECREATI GNAL FEES SUPPLIES TRAVEL TRAINING DUPLICATING COS' DUPLICATING COS" FUEL OIL FUEL OIL FUEL OIL FUEL OIL FUEL OIL GENERAL HYDRANT CHARGE 78 -10 HILLYOOD 85 -17 SOUTHLAWN 85 -21 HI SHLAND 85 -26 COPE AV —W- SANITARY SEWER I VEHICLE i EQUIP 1�1 0 3 7 Qr %*Tj 12' 0 ZEE-* 4 DOMER I y KATHLEEN m 6 7 2F, ... �, - 03 - t 04 12-0166 CUDE LARRY i 242m40 03705 12-0908 ZUERCHER JOHN L 157, 60 DIVISION 12 EMERGENCY SERVICES 1072080 03707 if if -ob 1 4 H H U t:. F%4 H KL- i r*4t:. i 1 071 . b -.5 03708 22-4432 MOELLER MA RGARET A 300w30 -EY L q I 03709 lco�.2-4446- MATIM S HLHNH K 784.51 03710 22-7550 VIGNALO DELORES A 774s01 DIVISION •2 ACCOUNTING 293O.74 0370S 1078-- rptjs DAN I 0z 40 DIVIS'luN -'--- - - -- 21-- FINANCE ADMINISIKRIMN 1686. 40 • DIVISION 01 LEGISLATIVE 1700■00 DATE 11/25/85 C I T Y 0 F M A P'L E W 0 PROGRAM PR10 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REP( I Y MRNHGL H -CHSICR 0 %3;* -7 0 1 10-4474 JAHN DAVID 1 174,40 0 02 10• 6523 UHU ts ,� NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME 'PAY CITY HALL MAINT 864.71 03695 01-0109 GREAVU JOHN C 400w00 03696 01-048► WAG ILUK CHARLOTTE P 325sZ0 BR TIRN GARY w ze�w 00 03698 01-8088 ANDERSON NORMAN G 3'25. 00 03699 01-9035 MAIDA MARYLEE T 325,00 1�1 0 3 7 Qr %*Tj 12' 0 ZEE-* 4 DOMER I y KATHLEEN m 6 7 2F, ... �, - 03 - t 04 12-0166 CUDE LARRY i 242m40 03705 12-0908 ZUERCHER JOHN L 157, 60 DIVISION 12 EMERGENCY SERVICES 1072080 03707 if if -ob 1 4 H H U t:. F%4 H KL- i r*4t:. i 1 071 . b -.5 03708 22-4432 MOELLER MA RGARET A 300w30 -EY L q I 03709 lco�.2-4446- MATIM S HLHNH K 784.51 03710 22-7550 VIGNALO DELORES A 774s01 DIVISION •2 ACCOUNTING 293O.74 0370S 1078-- rptjs DAN I 0z 40 DIVIS'luN -'--- - - -- 21-- FINANCE ADMINISIKRIMN 1686. 40 • DIVISION 01 LEGISLATIVE 1700■00 D I'VI S I ONF— I Y MRNHGL H lell. bo 0 %3;* -7 0 1 10-4474 JAHN DAVID 1 174,40 0 02 10• 6523 SWANSON, JR, LYLE E 690.31 DIVISION 10 CITY HALL MAINT 864.71 1�1 0 3 7 Qr %*Tj 12' 0 ZEE-* 4 DOMER I y KATHLEEN m 6 7 2F, ... �, - 03 - t 04 12-0166 CUDE LARRY i 242m40 03705 12-0908 ZUERCHER JOHN L 157, 60 DIVISION 12 EMERGENCY SERVICES 1072080 03707 if if -ob 1 4 H H U t:. F%4 H KL- i r*4t:. i 1 071 . b -.5 03708 22-4432 MOELLER MA RGARET A 300w30 -EY L q I 03709 lco�.2-4446- MATIM S HLHNH K 784.51 03710 22-7550 VIGNALO DELORES A 774s01 DIVISION •2 ACCOUNTING 293O.74 0370S 1078-- rptjs DAN I 0z 40 DIVIS'luN -'--- - - -- 21-- FINANCE ADMINISIKRIMN 1686. 40 • DATE .11/25/85 C I T Y 0 F M A P L E W 0 PROGRAM PR10 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER RE PC L CHECR. GROSS ol NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY �! 03711 31-2198 AURELIUS LUCILLE E 2021, 23 03712 31-481► SELVOG BETTY D 157. O8 S HADT JEANNE L 431a • DIVISION CITY CLERK RDMINISTHR-FlUN *t;;;� 6 0 91 3 2 , 0 7 03714 33 -0547 KELSEY CONNIE L 462s 338 03715 33-4435 VIETOR LORRAINE s 712,25 03716 42-0457 HENbLEY PHTHIUIR R 1371, 04 03717 33-6105 CARLE JEANETTE E 300o00 03718 33-8389 GREEN PHYLLIS C 859.01 03730 42-1364 ARNOLD DAVID L 1401. 14 DIVISION 33 DEPUTY REGISTRAR LEE Rub 2704a68 06 03732 42-1577 BANICK JOHN J 1065,56 03717 03733 COLLINS BOHL JOHN C KENNEIN V 1 751 a if;a 42— 1930 03720 41-2356 RICHIE CAROLE L 631u20 42-2063 037 41-2934 SVENDSEN JOANNE M 784.80 42-2115 0372Z,- 'al-835'- NECS u If 1528. 016 42-:2a3l 03723 41-7636 OMATH JOY E 643,20 42-2884 03724 41-9263 MART INSON CAROL F 551,20 DIVISION 41 PUBLIC SAFETY ADM IN 5889,60 0 7 j USSE PH 7's 0123726 42-0251 STILL VERNON T 1207w26 03727 42-0457 SKALMAN DONALD W 1229067 4"' 26* 1 --; 09 9 0 RAYMOND :T 120 7 a Z-b 03729 42-1204 STEFFEN SCOTT L 1155,38 03730 42-1364 ARNOLD DAVID L 1401. 14 03731 42 --13 8 a LEE Rub w 06 03732 42-1577 BANICK JOHN J 1065,56 03733 42-1660 BOHL JOHN C 975,00 03734 42— 1930 —"CL-AUSON DRLE K 1 *:;'5 2 a 0 ;-j 03735 42-2063 MOESCHTER RICHARD M 1381,06 03736 42-2115 ATCHISON JOHN H 1291u26 037:37--- 42-:2a3l KURTUS DUNRLD v 354m 03738 42-2884 PELTIER WILLIAM F 1378.74 0 7 DATE 11/25/85 C % T Y 0 F M A P LE W O `PROGRAMPR1Q PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REP( ___. ` NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY ' 03739 03740 - 42-2899 42-3243 SZCZEPANSKI WEL[.HLIN THOMAS CABOT i v 754~ 4�� 754.46 43-0009 ~'~ , _- 42-3591 L,"`" .`^". "`°D ~ ^~,~~.~ ,.- --' HE 03742 42-4801 RYAN MICHAEL P 1481.28 CAROL 03743 42-4916 HERBERT MICHAEL J 1268u86 M Qy374z�--�2�G1 1�---- -- 43F~2052 RlL-HHHD C 140"ll's 14- 03745 42-7418 BERGERON JOSEPH A 1008.96 03758 03746 42-7686 MEEHAN JR JAMES E 1222.12 43-6071 03747 42'-7887 ---- [S 6 ser- 03 7G0 43-7791 MELANDER 03748 42-8226 STAFNE GREGORY L 1229.66 RONALD 03749 42-8516 HALWEG KEVIN R 1378.74 R;3750 427--9T%04- - ------ 08751 42-9867 BOWMAN RICK A 1150 . 46 DIVISION 42 POLICE SERVICES 32352 . 15 f* 03752 43-0009 KARIS FLINT D 1085.66 03753 43-046E' ' --' HE , w� 03754 43+0918 NELSON CAROL M 1270.82 03755 43-1789 GRAF DAVID M 1278.46 03756 43F~2052 -- w� 03757 43-2201 YOUNGREN JAMES G 1348.88 03758 43-4316 RAZSKAZOFF DALE E 1372.96 03759 43-6071 - ' BE Rr 6 ser- 03 7G0 43-7791 MELANDER JON A 1577 72 . 03761 43-8434 BECKER RONALD D 1294.22 f* DIVISION 43 PARAMEDIC SERVICES 13318.35 , - ef3762 45-1878 ---- ' - iEMBE �= - 03763 45-3333 WILLIAMS DUANE J 1233.60 �~ DIVISION 45 FIRE P _---'-- 03764 46-0183 RAB%NE JANET L 860 20 03765 46-0322 - 03766 46-1899 _......_- ANTHONY . 1401 14 ' | --'- ------------ .� | ` f* DATE 11/25/85 DIVISION --46 -- �pROGFAMPR10 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REP( .. ^ CHECK uRuxss NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY ` 0.3767 46-5919 NELSON KAREN A 885.97 ' 03768 46-7030 MARTIN SHAWN �1 822~80 6 . 9 -.- 46- . 037 . ---- ---- --' 03770 51-0267 �ARTA MARIE L 618 40 0� - ~ 03771 51-3174 WEGWERTH JUDITH A 623,05 | DIVISION 53 ENGINEERING 6782.21 .' ~~ ` 03789 54-3775 LOFGREN JOHN R 677,60 ! DIVISION --`---------' 54 PUBLIC WORKS BLDG MAINT C I T Y O F M A P L E W O 677.6@ P PUBLIC WORK5 Humim 3 3511. to ` 03773 5 52-0547 M MEYER G GERALD W W 1 1255.32 03774 5 52-1241 K KANE M MICHAEL R R 1 1171.82 03775 5 52-1431 -'--- 03776 5 52-1484 R REINERT E EDWARD A A 6 679.88) 03777 5 52-3473 K KLAUSING H HENRY F F 1 1163.87 03778 5 52-473J' 03779 5 52-6224 T TEVLIN, JR, H HARRY J J 3 332.40 03780 5 52-6254 F FREBERG R RONALD L L 1 1043.00 03781 5 52-6755--- - ' --- r r,NER : :30SEPPI 1 1687, 04 03782 5 52-8314 C CASS W WILLIAM C C 1 1351.63 DIVISION 5 52 S STREET MAINTENANCE 1 10918.05 .~ 0 03783 5 53-1010 E ELIAS J JAMES G G 1 1105.60 ' 03/84 5 53-1G88--- - ----'' �� 0 03785 5 53-2522 P PRIEBE W WILLIAM 1 1052.98 03786 5 53-3970 A AHL-JR. R RAY C C 1 1369.23 03787 � �3�'467' -- ---------- 4 4. 00r 03788 5 53-G109 G GE%SSLER W WALTER M M 1 1084.8O DIVISION 53 ENGINEERING 6782.21 .' ~~ ` 03789 54-3775 LOFGREN JOHN R 677,60 ! DIVISION --`---------' 54 PUBLIC WORKS BLDG MAINT C I T Y O F M A P L E W O 677.6@ 03797 59-1000 MULVANEY DENNIS M 1052.80 03799 61-0389 ' ODEGARD ROBERT D 1571.20 03800 61-1066 BRENNER LOIS DATE 11/25/85 03801 C % T Y 0 F M A*p L E W 0 ` PROGRAM PR10 STAPLES PAULINE 1233.23 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REP( -- COMM SERVICES ADMIN 3952.25 - 03806 62-4121 "°U=,= 40 . NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME 03807 PAY - 03790 58-1014 NADEAU EDWARD A 970m40 ` 03791 58-1590 MULWEE GEORGE w 995. 41 03809 _ 58- 0 NOTESUN ERVERNE .5 .1-3 V023 03793 58-2563 BREHE%M ROGER S 970 14�' 03794 58-2582 EDSON DAVID B 1024,99 A 0379S -- 5877'90 ---- RNDERSUN 03812 5 b"34, 40 TONY 03796 58-5993 OWEN GERALD C 1008400 DIVISION 58 SAN SEWER OPERATION 6972.83 03797 59-1000 MULVANEY DENNIS M 1052.80 03799 61-0389 ' ODEGARD ROBERT D 1571.20 03800 61-1066 BRENNER LOIS J 832.62 03801 61-1993' - - 03802 61-2618 STAPLES PAULINE 1233.23 DIVISION 61 -- COMM SERVICES ADMIN 3952.25 DIVISION 62 PARK MAI �� G~403~'49 ��. ��. ` �� 03803 62-3411 GUSINDA MELVIN J 1261.23 3 0804 62-3915 - E 0� 03805 62-4097 YUKER WALTER A 135.00 - 03806 62-4121 HELEY ROLAND B 972,00 03807 62-4577-- -------- 03808 62-4949 SARRACK GUST D 360.00 03809 6�-5506 MARUSKA MARK A 991.52 �03810 62-t-7219- ----- 14�' | 03811. 62-8182 GERMAIN DAVID A 972.00 03812 62-9784 HUNTER TONY 96.00 DIVISION 62 PARK MAI �� G~403~'49 ��. ��. ` �� DATE 11/25/85 C I T Y O F M A P L E W 0 • 03820 64-0508 GREW JANET M 808.80 03821 64 -2163 SOUTTER CHRISTINE 404.40 038 `' 64-46 ' 6 . d • I n 016 PROGRAM PR 10 GEOFFREY W 1 552. 00 PAYROLL CHECK; REGISTER REP CHLEBECK JUDY M 800900 CHECK DIVISIOff! 71 COMM DEVELOPMENT ADMIN _ NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME DIVISION 74 HEALTH INSPECTIONS PAY s _ + 03814 63 -1518 /SHELDON LEO B 30088 } 03815 63-4246 WARD ROY G 375• '2O 03 816 63-5547 r ORTH KIMBERLY A 41. OST ROM 03817 63 - 64 ::'2 TAUBMAN DOUGLAS J 968.43. 03818 63-8158 PADGETT MARC I E P 80. 0o 03819 63 --8861 _ -' -- �� _� RRMS vw DIVISION " 6 -_ . 05 • 03820 64-0508 GREW JANET M 808.80 03821 64 -2163 SOUTTER CHRISTINE 404.40 038 `' 64-46 ' 6 . d • I n 016 GRAND TOTALS 1 '25541. 4E 03-3823 71 OLSON GEOFFREY W 1 552. 00 DIVISION 73 03824 71 --8993 CHLEBECK JUDY M 800900 DIVISIOff! 71 COMM DEVELOPMENT ADMIN 2 352. 00 G I RARD LAWRENCE M 155w00 f DIVISION 74 HEALTH INSPECTIONS 1219s00 0 3 92 5 -- 7. — 71'7EF .._ _ .� -� _ FUND NOT ON FILE 125541.42 i 03826 72-8505 JOHNSON RANDALL L 962.80 i DIVISION PLANNING 2059. 12 03827 73 --067 OST ROM MA RJO R I E 1281.60 GRAND TOTALS 1 '25541. 4E - DIVISION 73 BUILD INSPECTIONS 128 1.60 03829 74 -9223 G I RARD LAWRENCE M 155w00 f DIVISION 74 HEALTH INSPECTIONS 1219s00 FUND NOT ON FILE 125541.42 GRAND TOTALS 1 '25541. 4E r .MEMO RANDUM .lotion by Council :. Man Endorsed T0: City y M odified -,., FROM: Finance Director RE: Interfund Transfers for Unassessed Utility Improvements Rej ecte DATE: November 25, 1985 Date, n. Transfers are made annual from. the Dater Avail abi l ity Charge Fund, Hydrant Charge Fund, and the Sewer Fund to the Special Assessment to amortize :the cost of unassessed water and sewer improvements over the terms of the bends that were issued to,finance the improvements. When the tax levy for this year was adopted, reducti were made in the debt service tax levies for the anticipated transfers scheduled for 1985, Therefore, the following tra.nsfers are recommended.. TO Special Assessment Fund: FROM $ 78,100 W.A.C. Fund 71 Hydrant Fund 6 Hydrant Fund 2 Sewer Fund $ 157 5 860 Total TO Special Assessment Fund: -1973 Bonds ( #22) 1977 Bonds ( #25) 1979 Bonds ( #27) 1979 Bonds ( #27) DFF:1nb Aoti by, Council " N Z -1 MEMORANDUM Eridorse 8 �.. ie R ejected TO: City Manager Date ,.. FROM: Finance Director, City Clerk, Community Development Director RE: Increase in License /Permit Fees and Service Charges DATE: November 25, 1985 .ff"I.1 It is proposed that license /permit fees and service charges be increased by 4/ for fees and charges due after January 1, 19860 RArmpni INn Estimated revenues for the 1986 Budget are based on the assumption that business licenses and aermi t fees would be increased by 4/ effective January 1st. Also, it has been past practice to raise miscellaneous service charges annually to keep up with inflation, The proposed increase will generate approximately $6,800 of adds ti onal- revenues for the General Fund. In addition to rai'si ng exi sting fees by 4/, a new application fee for tax increment financing i's proposed. Details regarding this are in the memo attached (see next two pages). It should be noted that bu i l.d i ng permi°t and related fees (,grading, fi permits, etc.) will increase si gnificantly in 1986 as they are set by the State Uniform Building Code which has not been revised since 1982 El ectrical, heating and plumbing permit fees are proposed to remain the same in 1986 as our inspectors believe they are "i line" with the fees charged by other c es . Attached is a listing of present and proposed fees. It should be noted that revision of the planning - related fees requires adoption of an ordinance which is also attached. All of the proposed fees represent an approximate 4/ increase. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that (1) the Council approve the attached proposed fee schedule to be effective for fees and charges due after January 1, 1986 and (2) approve for first reading the attached ordinance DFF:1nb MEMORANDUM TO: Acting City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Application Fee -- Tax - Increment Financing DATE: November 25, 1985 SUMMARY Request Approve an application fee for tax- increment financing requests for private projects. Comments Mary Ippel, the city's bond counsel, suggested that a relatively large cash escrow should be required with a tax - increment application, because this type of financing requires a significant amount of time and money on the part of the city's bond counsel, financial advisor, attorney and staff. If a project proceeds to bond sale, proceeds from the bonds can be used to pay these costs. However, if the developer abandons the project before the bond sale, the city or its advisors have no way to recoup their costs. The developer should be responsible for the cost of the city's involvement to that p of nt . According to Mary Ippel, $5000 should be enough to cover these expenses. This problem recently occurred with the Beaver Creek Apartments tax - increment project. Substantial time and expense were incurred b city Y staff, the financial advisor and bond counsel. The developer, Castle Design, then dropped the. project, leaving he city to a th g y pay e cost. Recommendation Approve the following policy for tax - increment financing requests for private developments: An initial cash escrow of $5000 shall be prov ided with an application. If the bonds are sold, the cash escrow will be returned and the administrative costs paid from the bond proceeds. If the developer withdraws from the deal before the bonds are sold, the cash escrow will be returned, less the administrative Costs* If administrative costs are incurred above $5000, the applicant shall increase the cash escrow amount to cover these costs. BACKGROUND Tax-Increment Financin Tax-increment financin is amethod of financin projects with a public purpose b sellin bonds and repa them with the increase in taxes from a new development. Past Actions 2- 15 -85: Council g ave concept approval to a tax-increment proposal for the Beaver Creek Apartment project. It was initiated b Castle Desi and Development because of the excessive cost to construct a road, utilities, and emer access road to the prop Beaver Creek apartment complex . A number of public improvements were also included. The proje was s . ubse found to be financiall unfeasible and the developer withdrew, jw PLANNING FEES (Set by Ordinance): Zone Change Conditional Use. Permit Planned Unit Development Comprehensive Plan Amendment Variances: R -1 All Other Districts Vacations Lot Divisions (Fee per lot created) Preliminary Plat Home Occupation Permit: Initial ' Renewal S i gn Erection Perml t 1- 10 Sq . Ft .11- 25 26- 50 51 -100 Over 100 Billboard Erection Permit: First 5 Sq. Ft, Each Additional Sq. Ft. Billboard License Final Plat * Plus $10 for each affected property to pay for the County's new filing fee for resolutions. Proposed 1984 1985 1986 Fee Fee Fee X135 $140 .$146* 135 140 146* 135 140 146* 135 140 146 40 40 42* $0 80 83* 45 45 47* 30 30 31 135 140 146 40 40 42 15 15 16 10 10 11 15 15 16 25 25 26 55 60 62 105 110' 114 8 8 9 45� 47� 49� 195 205 213 30 30 31 * Plus $10 for each affected property to pay for the County's new filing fee for resolutions. LICENSES DUE JANUARY 1st.- Amusement Park License. B ench Permit. First Bench Each Additional Bench B 1fcense 1 n g o.,; For One Ni'qht/'Wk. for 52 Wks. For Two Ni' /Wk. for 52 Wks. One Night Christmas Tree Sales: Re Non-Profit Organization Ci & Tobacco Coin-Operated Amusement Devi,ces., Per Location Per Machine Do Kennels. First Time Renewal Gamblin License Golf C 'Motels.. 1 15 Units 16- .35 36-100 Over 100 Restaurant and/or Baker Food Establishment Caterin Food Vehicle: First Vehicle Each Additional Fleet License Itinerant Food Establishment: (Limit 7 Da First Da Each Additional Day License fee set b State Taw 30 30 301 15 15 15 Proposed 1984 1985 1986 Fee Fee Fee $105 $110 $115 30 30 35 15 15 20 105 110 .115 210 220. 230 10 10 15 100 105 110 75 80 85 30 30 30* 105. 110 115 26 27 30 30 30 30 10 10 15 105 110 115. 105 110 115 45 45. 47 65 70, 73 105 110 114 130 135 140 115 120 125 55 60 65 30 30 30 160 170 175 30 30 301 15 15 15 1 984 LICENSES DUE JULY 1ST: Fee Non-Perishable Food Vehicle: 1986 First Vehicle $ 30 Each Additional 15 Fleet License 70. Potentiall Hazardous Fo Vehicle, 80 First Vehicle 80 Each Additional 40 .Fleet License 240 .Special Food Handlin Establi'shment 40 Tavern License 210 .Taxicab License: 30 Base Char .30 Each Driver 10 Theater License: 230 Indoor 105 Outdoor 210, ,Contractor License 55 LICENSES DUE JULY 1ST: 3.2 Beer License: Proposed 1985 1986 Fee Fee $ 30 1.35 15 20 75 80 .85 90 40 45 250 260 40 45 220 230 30 30 10 '10 110 115 220 230 3.2 Beer License: On-Sale 100* 100*. 100* Off-Sale 30* 30* 30* Temporar Food & Beer 15/Da 15/Da 15/Da Used Car Dealer 210 220 230 LICENSES DUE AUGUST 1ST: Motor Vehil cle Repair 40 40 42 Service Station .First Pump 45 45, 47 Each Additional Pump 6 6 7 Trailer Rental: First 5 Trailers 15 15 15 Each Additional Trailer 2 2 5 *License fee set b State law LICENSES DUE NOVEMBER 1ST; Club Liquor License On -Sale Liquor Off -Sale Liquor Sunday Liquor Beer and Wine: Seating up to 25 Each Additional 10 Seats Maximum MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES: uommerciai ana inauszrial rtevenue Note /Bonds Base Charge (% of Bond Issue) Minimum Maximum Amount Paid With Application Liquor License Investigation .Fee ti sense _. Carnival License Solicitor License: Base Per Company Additional Per Solicitor Auctioneer License: Annual Daily Pawn Shop Pending Assessment Searches Pol - .ice Accident Report Copies Cat and Dog Licenses: Male Female Neutered /Spayed Tax Increment Financing Application Fee (escrow 1/ 5,.000 20 1,000 320 105 1/ 5,000 20,000. 1,000 335 1- -- 110 1/ 5,000 20 1,000 350 114 55 60 Proposed'. 1984 1985' 1986 Fee Fee Fee $ 300* $ 300* 300* 4 4 49460 200* 200* 200* 200* 200* 200* 800 841 875 105 110 115 2 2,230 2 1/ 5,.000 20 1,000 320 105 1/ 5,000 20,000. 1,000 335 1- -- 110 1/ 5,000 20 1,000 350 114 55 60 62 30 30 31 55 55 57 15 15 16 55 55 57 6 6 6 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 3 3 - - 5,000 *License fee set by State law Proposed Buildin Relocation ., Communit Desi Review Board Sewer Connection Permit ( Connection}00 Residential Connection Non-Residential Connection Movin Permit Wreckin Permit Drivewa Permit Propert Owner List Mobile Home Permits PUBLICATIONS (includes sales tax) Zoni Code Plattin Code Si Code Comprehensive Plan Zonin Map Cit Map 1984 1985 1986 Fee Fee Fee $105 $110 $114 55 60 62 25 30 31 40 45 47 2/1,000 c,f. 60' 62 1/19000 d,fo 30 31 5 6 6 2750 30, 31 + 3,50/name + 3,50/name + 3,60/name 30 35 36 5 6 6 2.50 3 3 2950 2,50 2.50 10 10. 10 3 3.50 3,50 3 3.50 3.50 I — - -- - -- -- - - - - -- -- - -- - 3 -*-SO- - - - - - --- - - ---- ---- -- -3-0-50 ORDINANCE NO. PLANNING FEES Section 1. -Section 36 -26 of the Zoning Code of the City of Maplewood is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 36 -26. Fees. The following nonrefundable application fees shall be required: Zone Change Conditional Use Permit Planned Unit Development Comprehensive Plan Amendment Variances: R -1 All other districts Vacations Lot Divisions Preliminary Plat Home Occupation Permit Final Plat $146 146 146 146 42 83 47 31 for each lot created 146 42. for the initial permit and 16 for an annual renewal 31 *This fee shall be increased by $10 for each affected property, to Day for the County's recording fee Section 2 Section 36 -258 of the sign code is amended as follows: Sec. 36 -258. Fees. (1) A sign erection permit fee (except for billboards) shall be paid in accordance with the following schedule: Square Feet Fee 1 - 10 $ 11 11 - 25 16 26 - 50 26 51 - 100 62 over 100 114 (2) The fee for erection of billboards shall be $9.00 for the first five square feet, plus 49¢ for each additional square foot. (3) The annual license fee for billboards shall be $213. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect on January 1, 1986. Passed by the Maplewood City Council on Mayor Attest: Ayes- - Cl erk Nays -- MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: Budget Change - LOGIS DATE: November 27, 1985 Acti by Council Endorsed M odif i e Rejected �. A 1986 Budget transfer is needed to finance unanticipated LOGIS d ata processing costs. During the past year, payroll and utility bil ling software was installed on the computer in the Publ i Safety Department. This has allowed us to discontinue using LOGIS data processing services for payrol and utility bi l l i which w i l l save money in the long run, The LOGIS costs for these services in 1986 alone would -be about $12,000. Accounting and purchasing software was also installed and tested on the City's computer. However, this software had several weaknesses and was not implemented. When the 1986 Budget was prepared, i t was anti cipated that software from a different vendor could be used instead, A recent eval uation of thi software has indicated that it also has several weaknesses This means that the City will have to continue the LOGIS accounting and purchasing software. The unanti gated addi costs of thi are $20,170. It is recommended that the Council approve a 1986 budget transfer of $20,170 from the Contingency Account to the Finance'Department budget to finance the unanticipated LOGIS data processing costs. Al DFF :1 nb 5 "'" AWA. MEKORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Fi nance Di rector RE: Fi'nanci al Transfer to Close Project 80 -5 DATE: November 26, 1985 Action by Council: Endorsed Modifie Rejecte Date PROPOSAL It is proposed that the remaining balance i 'n Project 80-5, White Bear Avenue from County Road B to Highway 36, be transferred to the Street Construction State Aid Fund, RArVr_Dniinin Project 80 -5.was a joint project with Ramsey County to make - safety improve- ments and install. new traffic signals on White Bear Avenue south of Highway 36. The City's, share of this prod ect " s cost was f nanced by a transfer from the Street Construction State Aid Fund. Total City expenditures amounted to approximately $23,550. The.current balance in this project's accou -nt is $449. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the rema'ninq balance in Project 80 -5 be transferred to the Street Construction State Aid Fund. DFF :1 nb November 25, 1985 MEMORANDUM To: Acting City Manager Kenneth Haider From: Director of Public Safety Kenneth V, Collins Subject: Public Safety Dispatcher Action by Council Endorse Modified,,, eiected -. Date In the 1986 budget, the City Council approved the hiring of another Public Safety Dispatcher. We have completed the written examinations and personal interviews; and based on the results of these examinations and interviews, it is my recommendation that we hire Scott Boyer as a probationary Public Safety Di saptcher effective January 6, 19868 I submit this for your review and handling. KUC: j s cc Personnel Files Finance Director 4,L MEMORANDUM Action by Council Endorse T0: City Manager Rodified— FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson SUBJECT: Final Plat Date LOCATION: Cope Avenue, East of English Street APPLICANT /OWNER: Ed Cave and Sons, Inc. PROJECT: Cave's Cope Avenue Addition DATE:. December 2, 1985 SUMMARY Reque Approve a final plat for four single and two double dwelling lots. Recommendation Approve the Cave's Cope Avenue Addition f i n a l plat, BACKGROUND Past Actions On September 23, 1985 Council approved: 1. Cave 's,Cope Avenue Addition preliminary tat, subject to: P J a. Entering into a developer's agreement, with required surety, to repair Cope Street where additional water and sewer services are to be constructed. b. Dedication of the east thirty feet of Lot Seven as a uti l i t y and drainage easement. (On October 14, 1985, the city engineer allowed this easement to be relocated to the common lot line between Lots Six and Seven.) c. City engineer approval of final utility and grading plans. The grading plan shall include an erosion control plan. d. Proof of installation contracts with NSP, Bell Telephone and e. Change Cope "Street" Addition to Cope "Avenue" Addition. 2. A rezoning from R -1, single dwelling to R -2, double dwelling i n for h g the area comprising Lots Six and Seven of this plat. Procedure City council decision jW Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map ' 3. Final Plat (82 x 11) 4. Final Plat (separate enclosure) 2 • A t 1 r...•nY•4iA.a . .... _ ,,.. ... ti. . ._ ,+.+....s+..a...wu.+w. i....i rws r` G F o • R _ P,U 0 3 • �i 2 F Cr F ,LBC a R_3C j ~ F I� K HLM 4 R 1 v' cmn _ � � F R = ro T y R x �.� W . R - w ROAD R� , ' F ' .J R PUD. � R cn [.R °z• F C I F R • F MI � ! F � a0 . , Ml U. EDGEHILL R R F W F 1 (R2 DEMONT A ) RD Q Ml _F a 8C R L B C a F SEXTAN AVE a _ MI �'t R 3 F 7 , R. M I � + r�'. R �, Q Y R LAC MI WANDvIEw Av V - -- - - -� kv _ R Q M I R T NK _ ,_._. _ - - -- I WAY 01 M I a _ 36 F MI l V C MI ' '�� • _r L RK (R2 R-3C LBC) J R Z u _ C ouN Y R a --� R ! L. - _ � �� • Y R P ST �. AV C ~ Q R 0 (R2) q R F AVE BURKE F A R R av 4 4 E • � N► i) ��; 2 � � f ELDRIDGE A } � R- 6 C R _ 6E M ' L ANE 1 w M I c F J s L _.J N W F � F ._,..- "�.. , m AVE avE M � �p0 , �' ... F ROSE W oD AvE � ,, . R •...._ . . R2 RYAN J 4 • , + i • � ' j R YAS► J R2) ROSFWOOD r . •- F LBC - - - -- 9 � � '" J F a' F R S v I 4 cEvt 0 8 (- •" + 1 u� j F AVE O � I W R s z o R I _ R 3 �► l j j n r Ro W Q R R F Cr R R SBIE RZ w 5� ui o t a � • - P ff R F x i • RIPL p ' R3 R _.. _ - __ Y 7 R W j – AVE Ln O _ NIA AVE Y Z R �. o R 3 / =EAVE Avg w " F x 'tt R _ 2) BC 1. AKE F R t �� AvE (� R ' ( W — 41 1 7 _. 0 rR �., 1 a R Z I N C •..�� C/ . TY OF ST. PAUL Q LOCATION MAP '� 3 ' Attachment 1 Q N M s � V r t - • J kwft M L'AR -K r Y • .4 ..:.:: ::...: :: .ti•• • ..� 4 0 ... t _40 ::. : :•..•.�,,�•:. r• 3 1 410- 1 d 13 1 Z :::: f•:.:: -:.: I a 1 1 :• .,, r ,. � I•� I i I � t — t I Z 33, t tz { »•'I is U, I f8 � 19 � zo I ` Z I za ►� r8 � S 9 1 20 I �t � { f undeveloped I t I I t AVE. 14 I i3 1z • (i• 9c ? 891 _ I I I '» t 14 �fi i� !'�� I i8 �, zo i Z 12 1 231 ,Q 1 25 17 2 r ROAD C .14. Q I I I 1 (3. 1 12.1 11 10 9 18 7 I 4 3 Z / IL t5 l4 t3 so � I I+ 1 Z 1 &- %.- I - f 1 1 0 T _ T o r l zz ,�3ANUHURST C Vat .. ,�. •. , � 4D PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Zone Change to R -2 4 Attachment 2 � 4 N L' 1 t.. .�.Jr`. - 5W IS -- N8,9 *S? X • ' ?SG BSA ! t �� i � i 1 i t t 1 �t I• 1 a, 31 LC to it `� + I I ; 8 C i i i 1 j t �t I �1 �► 00 ISM *4 t too ♦ I t ! A r1r fit► t, t - rJ♦ t t t 1 't.3 ' t? G ^ rifl` -0 ,v JL_I'�r� �� L. � . 1 CAVES COPE AVENUE ADDITION (Proposed Final . Plat) Dwellings under construction 5 Attachment .3 4 N Action by Co oily MEMORANDUM Endorsed....- City Manager o.i Associate Planner -- Johnson e . e Tax- Exempt Financing (Final Approval) Sti llwater Road and Stillwater Avenue' Tri =State Maple Ridge Limited Partnership' Silver Ridge Apartments (formerly known as Maple Ridge Estates) December 3, 1985 SUMMARY Request Grant final approval for $5.5 million in tax-exempt mortgage P revenue financing for this apartment complex. This project meets the city's criteria for approval. pp The developer will pay a program participation fee to the city of $13,7500 In f addition, the city will receive an annual fee of approximately y 220 $ , over the life of the bond issue (10 years) . This is a requirement city. approval, q for Recommendation Approve, the resolution on page 5 to rant final approval fo g PP r $5.5 million in tax- exempt financing for the Silver Ridge apartment complex, subject to paying the annual program participation fee at bond closing. g P P the BACKGROUND Past Actions 3- 11 -85: ...... Council gave final to x- exempt f i nanc i n - a roval to the Maple ' g PP Ridge Apartments (Podawi ltz) for $3.8 million. The bond c in was October 10 1985* g r 7-- 22 -85: Council gave preliminary approval to the requested financing, subject g � to construction beginning within one year. Construction is underway Planning All zoning, platting and site and building plan approvals g p pp is have been given. Legal The city's bond counsel, Mary Ippel of Briggs and Morgan, has stated that all of the documents required for this financing are consistent with the city's requirements. City council decision jW Attachmen 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Resolution 2 v O O -: �� _ o eover j Lake Q ,r'• J CASE AV TILL 32 U v D .02 V, R.22 w. 6 zt i !.: t L±' I Tonners L0 12 3 LOC MAP 3 Attachment 1 t • 1 o ti Z8.2� �. • s ,3� 5 •3e� 2 oo' .' ?% is j 2 0 0 C -e . +'7 •� • �' AVE*— -J 1 3-,5 z !j_"� R t* a3 Saac 6` e IS 3. ,� 15;x.31 3 3 $°� 101.9 ZI.tS�• ' 1!'•! 33 u' O7° n, O � �• ' .,. �` �: � � � - r .l � ��'f yam' � " .0 ono rN �� Zt �rl V �• 5P ' « A at C G i t o f 5 �. P.�,.1 (5 c T � - 090 �• - VI ,a . d4 0 0 0 • E ou �9 r - �� •�' V ,w _ p , � V L to �Z r o, (4, A A K E LOTH, CH. N 4 .2G 9 en S17 r ►-2 • 9 co �3; J Z 58a� o N L.J. acho 0!5;0 57 1 - i /r37. 4 4,3s ^C x'4 O 4� / O O A7 /3l �Tq� ;o (2a) Z A tNo CIE i 544bs. to Fiowagc Esmt Di �15.3Cac� o zo 51 I ct1 3•, � F+ N i hw a Es�+i , - 25 MA ■+ "i _L.0 v "JT OWN . "36a.: 01 CI P 3g _;01 �o too 1 C E . Np l toti — ls r � 4 ' - JLn / X00.9 *V (- O� 3 h y K• 00 O Ln _...• a i i (u 3 0 N 7• o ro s t 7) .� PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Attachment 2 4 4 N r RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A PROJECT AND HOUSING PROGRAM UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER. 462C (MUNICIPAL HOUSING PROGRAMS) AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF ' MULTIFAMILY ' HOUSING REVENUE BONDS TO FINANCE THE PROJECT AND PROGRAM AND THE EXECUTION OF VARIOUS DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, a s follows: 1. The Council has received a proposal from Tri-State Maple Ridge Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, p (the "Company ") that the City undertake to finance a certain Project and multifamily rental housing program for such Project as herein described, pursuant to Chapter 462C, Minnesota Statutes (the "Act ") , through the issuance b the City of its Y y $5,500,000 Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Series 1985 (Silver Rid e g Apartments Project) (the "Bonds"), and in accordance with a Bond Purchase Agreement (the "Bond Purchase Agreement ") between the City, the Company, and Dain Bosworth Incorporated or designee (the "Bond Purchaser ") . 2. The Company desires to acquire and construct a multifamily housing development consisting of approximately six .buildings containing 186 units and related improvements including g parking facilities (hereinafter referred to as the "Project") in the City, The Project as ..described above will facilitate the de.v.elopment of rental. within the community; encourage the development of affordable housing opportunities for residents f 0 the City, encourage the development of housin g facilities 5 Attachment 3 ' f j designed for occ upancy anc • p y by persons of low or moderate income and assist such persons in obtaining decent, safe and sanitary . Y housing at rentals .they .can afford; encourage the �devel o me p nt of blighted. or underutili land within the boundaries of the Cit • and .will otherwise. further the* policies and -purposes of: the Act• and. the findings made in the Preliminary Resolution adopted b p Y this Council on July 22, 1985 with respect to the Project are hereby ratified, affirmed and approved. 3e It is proposed that, pursuant to a Loan Agreement dated as of December 1, 1985, between the C as Lender and the Company as Borrower (the "Loan Agreement ") , the City loan the proceeds of the Bonds to the Company to partially finance the costs of the Project. The Loan Repayments to be made by the Company under the Loan Agreement are fixed so as to produce revenue sufficient to pay the principal of , premium, if any r . and inte rest on the Bonds when due. It is further proposed that the City assign its rights to the Loan Repayments and certain other • rights under the Loan Agreement to First Wisconsin Trust Compan P Y, in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. (the "Trustee ") as security or payment Y P Y of the Bonds under an Indenture of Trust dated as of December 1 1985 (the "Indenture ") between the City and the Trustee. To further secure the payment of the Bonds and the interest thereon and of the purchase price of any Bonds required to be purchased under the provisions of the Indenture, the Company will provide for a Loan Purchase Agreement (the "Loan Purchase Agreement ") to be executed by First Financial Savings Association (the "Bank" ) and in connection therewith, enter into a Reimbursement Agreement ;6 j dated as of 'December 1, 1985 (the "Reimbursement Agreement ") with the Bank. Payments under the Loan Purchase Agreement and payments on the Bonds will be further- secured 'by collateral' pledged to the Trustee by the Bank. p ursuant to a Collateral Agreement dated as of December. 11 1985 by and.. between.. the Bank and the Trus tee . Payment of the principal and interest on the Bonds is also secured by a Mortgage, Assignment of Rents and Leases, (the "Mortgage ") dated as of December 1, 1985 executed by the Company in favor of the Trustee, The acquisition, construc- tion, operation and occupancy of the Project will conform to the terms and conditions of a Regulatory Agreement (the "Regulator Y Agreement ") dated as of December 1 1985 between the City, the Company, the Bank and the Trustee and a Declaration of Restrictive Covenants (the "Declaration ") dated as of December 1, 1985 executed by the Company and recorded as a covenant and restriction running with the land on which the Project is located. 40 This Cou nci 1 , by action taken on July 22 , 1985, adopted a resolution giving preliminary approval to a ro osal to p p finance a project substantially the same as the Project; and on or about December 7, 1985 the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency gave approval to the proposed financing program for the Project. 59 Pursuant to the preliminary approval of the Council, forms of the following documents have been submitted to the Council for approval: (a) The Loan Agreement. (b) The Indenture. _ 7 (d) The Bond Purchase Agreement. - (d) -The. Regulatory Agreement, (e) The Declaration (not executed by the City),' i t Y ) . - 6. It is hereby found -, determined and declared that: (a,) the Project described in the Loan Agreement: and Indenture .refer red to above constitutes a Project authorized by the Act and the financing program for the Project is authorized by the Act; (b) the purpose of the Project and the program for the Project is, and the effect thereof will be, to promote the p ubl i c welfare by the acquisition, construction and equipping of rental housing facilities for assisting persons of low and moderate A income within the City to obtain decent, safe and sanitary housing at rentals they can afford; (c) the acquisition, construction and installation of the Project, the issuance and sale of the Bonds, the execution and delivery by the City of the Loan Agreement, the Indenture, the Bond Purchase Agreement and the Regulatory Agreement (collectively the "Agreements ") , and the p erformance of all covenants and agreements of the City contained in the Agreements, and of all other acts and things required under the constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota and City Charter to make the Agreements valid and binding obligations of the City in accor- dance with their terms, are. authorized by the Act; (d) it is desirable that the Company be authorized, in accordance with the provisions of. the Act and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Loan Agreement, Regulatory g g Y S Agreement and Declaration, which terms and conditions the City Y determines to be necessary, desirable and proper, to acquire and install the Project by such means as shall, be available to the. Company and in the manner determined by the, Company, sub j ec t to the.. ,terms of the .aforesaid -, agreements ; (e) i t is desirable that the Bonds be issued b the . Y City upon the terms set forth in the Indenture; (f) the loan repayments under the * Loan Ag reement , are fixed to produce revenue sufficient to provide for the rom t p p payment of principal of premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds issued under the Indenture when due, and the Loan Agreement g / Indenture and Regulatory Agreement also provide that the Company � Y is required to pay all expenses of the operation and maintenan ce Of the Project, including, but without limitation, adequate insurance thereon and insurance against all liability for in ' j ury Y to persons or property arising from the operation thereof, and all taxes and special assessments levied upon ' p p o r with respect to the Project and payable during the term of the Loan Agreement, Indenture and Regulatory r Agreement; g Y g t. (g) as provided in the Loan Agreement and Indenture, the Bonds are not to be payable from or charged upon an fund g p Y s other than the revenues pledged to the payment. thereof ; the City is not subject to any liability thereon ; no holder of any Bonds shall ever have the right to compel any exercise by the City of its taxing powers to pay any of the Bonds or the interest or pre- mium, if any, thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any Y property of the City except the interests of the City in the Loan i Agreement which have been assigned to the Trustee under the Indenture ; the Bonds shall constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance , legal or equitable, upon-any property: the . C'it Y ` .except the interests of the City- in the Loan Agreement which have ;. been assigned, . to the. under, the .Indenture ; ..the Bonds ...shall.. recite that the Bonds are issued without moral obligation on the part of the state or its political subdivisions, and that the Bonds, including interest thereon, are payable solely. from the revenues pledged to the payment thereof and that the bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation; and (h) a public hearing on the Project was duly held by the City Council on July 22, 1985. 7* Subject to the approval of the City Attorney and c the provisions of Section 10 of this Resolution, the forms of the Agreements and exhibits thereto are approved substantially in the f rm submitted and on f ile in the of fice of the City Clerk. The Agreements, in substantially the form submitted, are directed to be executed in the name and on behalf of the City the Ma Y Y or Y and. the City Manager. Any other documents and certificates necessary to the transaction described above shall be executed by the appropriate City officers., Copies of all of the documents necessary to the transaction herein described shall be delivered, f filed and recorded as provided herein and in said Loan Agreement g t and Indenture. 8. The City shall proceed forthwith to issue its Bonds, in the form and upon the terms set forth in the Indenture and this Resolution. The bonds shall initially bear interest at 10 r a ra to of not greater than eleven percent (11%) per annum. The Bond Purchaser-shall 'purchase the Bonds for an amount not less than 96% of the principal amount of the Bonds Vie offer o'f . the -Bond Purchaser to so purchase the Bonds is hereby cce ted: The Y p -May,or and City Manager., a re authori.z ed . and directed to .re ...: .. p p a re and execute the bonds as prescribed in the Indenture and to deliver them to the Trustee for authentication and delivery to the Bond Purchaser. 9. The Mayor and City Manager and other officers of the City are authorized and directed to re are and furnish p p to the Bond Purchaser certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds, and such other affidavits and certificates as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality of the Bonds as such facts appear f r pp om the books and records in the - off ice rs' custody and control or as otherwise known to them; and all such certi f ied copies, p , certificates and affidavits, including n heretofore furnished, g Y shed, shall constitute representations of the City s to the 'truth y th of all statements contained therein. 10. The approval hereby given to the various documents t ref erred to above includes approval of such additional details therein as may be necessary and 'appropriate and such modifi p ca - { tions thereof, deletions therefrom and additions h t e re to as may be necessary and appropriate and approved by the City Attorney and the City of f_icials authorized herein to execute said documents prior to their execution; and said City Attorney an Y y d City officials are hereby authorized to approve said changes on 11 1 behal f of the City. The execution of any instrument by the 'appropriate of ficer or officers of the City. herein authorized shall be conclusive. evidence of the approval of such docume*n Pp ts- In ..accordance with.. the terms hereof-. In the .. absence (,or inability). .. of - :: the officials authorized he to execute any of the documents herein referred to, the documents may be executed by any officer or memeber of the City ctin in their behalf Y g . Passed: December 9, 1985 Mayor Attest City Clerk (SEAL) 12 MEMORANDUM Amtiou by Council Endor Modifi -~�~�^ |U: Acting City Manager --~--~~"~-~�.. FROM: Public Works Coordinator SUBJECT: Budget Transfer--Lift Station ' 85-9 DATE: December l, 1985 As indicated in earlier memos, the need to transfer funds to the sewer fund capitol outlay budget will be necessary to '- meet the higher costs associated with the above-referenced pro'eot. The following is u summary of the costs of that project: Featiblity Study and Design - � 8 O Feasibility Study--Gravity Relief Line - ^ 2,000~00 Original Contract Amount 163,500.00 Change Order No l , - 39180~45 Project Inspection and As Built Plans 89600,00 Project Total $1769 g79.45 8udneted Amount _� - �1379 400.00 Budget Deficiency - $ 399619.55 Two additional changes to the plans dealing with explosion proof light fixtures and the sump pumps are expected to cost an additional $600.00 (Change Order No. 2--not yet processed). This amount should also be transfe at this time, It is recommended that the amount of $40,120.0 0 be transferred to the capitol outlay budget ( 9O-468O-58) from the sanitary sewer fund unreserved retained earnings, P T0: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT /OWNER: DATE: �„ - „s_ / 0 Actio by Council: MEMORANDUM E ndo r se d ._ Modifiecd_.....:�. City Manager R ejecte d- As P 1 anner - -J ohns6ftt -- Time Mobile Home Permit 1918 Kennard Street John Roberts December 3, 1985 SUMMARY Request Approve a 90- day time extension to use a mobile home as a temporary p y residence at 1918 Kennard Street while the applicant's fire-damaged dwelling is being reconstructed. The property owners found substantially ore damage and y g structural problems with their home than had been originally anticipated. Reconstruction is anticipated to be completed b February 198 P y y 6 . All of the conditions of approval have been complied with. Recommendation Approve a 90 -day time extension to use a mobile home as a temporary residence at 1918 Kennard Street, with the option for renewal if needed, while the property owner's fire-damaged dwelling is b reconstructed, g g eing 1 BACKGROUND . Past Action - . On September 5, 1985 the city council approved the use of a mobile bile home at this location , as a temporary residence for 90 days, subject to • 1. Connection to a natural gas line, a ro ane or similar p P ( gas) tank or to an NSP line. The city fire marshal shall approve the, location of and connection to a propane tank. 2 . Connection to city water. The connection shall be approved b y St.,Paul Water Utility, PP 3e Connection to city sewer. The connection shall be approved b y city staff. PP 4. If connection to city water or sewer is not ractical an P , alternate method of. sani tat ion must be approved by city staff, . Planning Section 36 -66 (5) of the zoning code states that one mobile-home trailer may be parked on improved property temporarily Y s b P ecial permit, which shall expire .ninety days from the date of issuance. Procedure City council decision jW Attachments le Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 2 ! F MI R �. Ml a BC • MI MI M1 T 1F M1 (�� V COUNTY L - E f ' LELA NO (R2) 7 F -y1 r � � 1J 4 2 0 �J R z LOCATION MAP 3 Attachment 1 f I N C/ r OF ST. P,4GL � N co on Q I o 110 .i5 33 33 o 4 58. 8 t8 3ro� M �r ;3 33 r-N. V. L. to 0 .7 r 11'r OZc�'P 1 920 t a�► 4 2 �o.o 0� 9 3 1684 A3 ,,,,�i . v 78) 14 b.0 to co :r•.• • •w•••w wr•w •srw� :w :':• � ) ? � C Z �•:�� 1918 :f:: •:::r:::• ��:� / ..i � � •: :• •. • : :: ' : i :rv. :mow' :: �.S J • • .�.i i : •. �o �� .► 1896 t�6) - ( (�) 3 (44) " (G t14 � _._......? � Vin" ° � ;3 9 . a z aA _ _�____ r______ _____�. � (12� o (73) (5) in L �� ; 4 Ln (50) O f 4 t` �• T ? � gd m s ._..... ________ 2, 5.99 ^`� 9 5. 99 ► Cd 2 9 5. 97 (5-3) A l � I r.) b o� � s��• � � b ) - 2 9 .9 6„_,,,_, e . Ln 75 120. 42 (57) to K 3 (23) o . av.. ( 2 --) I o 1 o_ • to O %1 41. . !� �J S • �2 _____ —____- 29 5.9 2 20 0 �� I N } Via. �► � `� 1 4 �' ( l _ F4 L�) 4 ( 1 1A 41 -- - X48► (�5). 09) t32 19 (01 37 W) • " y 4 op Al 6 . 1 e o T3 5 75 ' ' ''�S• "y8 I 0 3(7 L 7 7 ! . -75 75 0 490.v 1 it 0 w) (2) u, 09� ?c it-Oro u (38)x. i! O :0 49 ` 37) (3G� " t (35) (34-) 0 W O 96 Ln (31) tn (30} (n) th (mil (25). 41a (z3) ( 95.93 LD w92 '`J o (17) Q 14 d (t &) - -- ( 43/1 _._........ �. 0 0 _ - _ (41) �1 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Atr arhmon. 9 iii it ---- / / .TO: City Manager Action by Council :. FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson SUBJECT: Final Plat ndorse. _ LOCATION: Crestview Drive and Mail and Road Modifie APPLICANT /OWNER: Mary Anderson Construction Company Reje0ted... PROJECT: Crestview 3rd Addition Dat DATE:.. November 27, 1985 SUMMARY Request Final plat . approval for 39-single-dwelling lots . All of the conditions of preliminary plat approval have been complied, with. Recommendation Approve the Crestview 3rd Addition final plat. BACKGROUND . Past Actions 10 Counci l amended the conditions of approval for the Crestview 3rd Addi- t"a_on preliminary plat to read' as follows: a A signed developer's agreement shall submitted to the city engineer to assure construction of the followin g items: (1) All internal improvements, including the two drainage ponds. (2) That part of the pond on the adjacent town house property to the west, (3) An outlet pipe from the Road storm sewer, (4) A ten -foot wide asphalt fencing) between Lot 12, B 1 o Fencing will not be required prior to construction of the southeast pond to the Mailand path, (eight feet if no ck 2 and Lot 1, Block 1. if the trail is constructed adjoining dwelling. (5) A ten -foot wide asphalt trail (eight feet wide, if no fence and nine feet wide, if fenced on one side) along the west edge of the Williams Brothers Pipeline easement and on the walkway to be dedicated west of Lot 1, Block 5, Crestview Addition. Fencing will not be required along the west side of the trail if it is constructed before an abutting dwellin g is constructed. Fencing will also not be required along the east side of the trail provided the owners of the single- dwelling properties unanimously agree that fencing is not necessary. If fencing is installed, gates onto the trail from adjoining properties may be permitted, provided the property owner pays the cost of the gate. The type of fencing material shall be approved by the city parks director. Written permission from Williams Brothers Pipeline shall be submitted to the director of community development authorizing the trail on this easement . The applicant shall eliminate the depression in the trail corridor, north of Mai land Road, to maximum extent permitted by Williams Brothers Pipeline. b. Approval of final grading and drainage plan b the city g p Y Y engineer. 2 c Deed restrictions shall be approved b the cit attorne and filed with each of the double - fronta lots, prohibiti,,n access to Londin Lane, d The applicant shall deed Outlots, A and B ( ,storm water ponds to the cit or revise these out lots b extendin the rear y ards of adjacent lots and sho-win draina easements over the areas .presentl shown as Out lots A and B. 'The developer's a shall 'contain the erosion control procedures recommended b the soil conservation service in their report of March 2.6,, 1979 except for Condition 1 on pa 340 fo Council vacation of the north three feet of Mai land Road ri g . Renamin "Lakewood Drive" and "Crestview Lane" to I'Marnie Curve." All of the street addresses shall be for a north/south street, h.. Renamin I'Marnie Street" and "Prescott Road" to "Hi Curve." All of the street addresses shall be for a north/south street, 2. Council vacated the north three feet of the Mailand Road ri g ht -of- wa that abuts this site, 3. g Council approved a rezonin from F, farm residence to R-1, sinle dwelli for this site. Council decision mb Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Final Plat ( 8 1/2 x 11 3. Final Plat ( blue line). r 1..._-.1 t UPPER AFTON' RID. L -0 71 �+. LA r4ll LOWER r TON RD cc • LONDIN L A. �- - z V _ O~y (1) WARY LA WE . AV O • t 39 1 Z) D L 68 , o 3) (3) PO+*O AVE (1) O DAY CIRC; F ES) �f LAKE WOC^ { T EnKWOO�. CRI E rT VIE W DRS - E I U) Z Z p 0 0 .0 2 Z 1 23 �•- LINWOOD AVE_ ft HL AVt 72 _ VAN ` LS••sr Z _ DA KL i . »d . C - x 0 T 2 8 N !1J gD 1217 R22W 13 f8 R2111, ? !- Q _ Cr C ; 474 7Z ^^ ' 14IGHWOOD AV -77 4 94 LOC'ATI'ON MAP 4 Attachment 1 N • CONNEMARA North line of S.E.' /4 o f `' See. 1L. T. L8, R. 22 �. li iv D! w S.88 1317.04 1 • 1► 1 r �. f•1 I.v 1. • 495.90 y LONDIN _ 'LANE e2.A p r • �• 29042WXrJ.�s s -- 13000 -.bay pc I '' �••• •159.72...Oj z oo • ,�,b at O JOUTLOT in o y 0 - 4 10 i I tie' �� / • z 0 �- 4 -1 f f- -� r r - 86.52 »., r r -- 94.53. -, 1 1 -. 2. 2.., 1 113.47 -..: 15140 -__ 7e J � L S 1 / ti J � ►- a a •- � � F c ca F Z - a ago 1 O o`i ,`�V�Pg i�s� /7Z6, J$C�, , 0t1 �!, \eb��h 4 •= ?. ^III 369.•S'S 1M EST 6 ✓� � on. o` ° 4 ,( `i ♦ Q`�' � L .4 4 o ., �, M ••� a o �'.� • d m ",�''. 4 _ I rq N i G N P O 1 N T C V R V iE '90. �� o•. , ,� r SV J �pS�„ p O �•-/`s v \ • ls'b l ' d :f 16 IL - 38.55 r .. 85.00. 05.00 - 2. 00. 1 • 09 O • N d•0.3814" f 1 M1 h 1-• � � •'► �- . O3 � �' �' /� • �` �.. .'�' • i l b''l �� !� o 2 0 3 2 0 4 t o s = o ! Q, ! p o 9. .800 w •� 0��• �fi. ! �• `1b 'y�i O 6 % - Z M O s1 G 0 01� 6 9 O �� O. • •'''� ��•� ; - i z • 5.4 � 90 aS.00�- •8800•J � - 2 0.1 l -7 , 00 1- 10 472.41 EAST r - 130.00 i 30 30 1 0 1110 -9 A 30 00 -, I 8 ._ dC •- - -EAST- . . J o • r� .. 13000• • - 1 r 0 1 1 I L J N ° 0 '- - - EAST.- o � F' in . 9 o tit r 13000.. - -. . a O << --EAST--- 12 _ 12 o h ^ V N i.' `130.00• -- ; o 130.00 O 0 fo --- EAST- - -_� ° 10 0 0,00 20,00- ALKw1 C - -- - EAST' - EAST _ ; T f I 130.00 1 uj 1 - h 1 1 ' - .• O p 1 N 41 o o+ I O 0 h 11 n a, LJ 1 M 1 - -- EASE.. - -J p� UTLOT u1 3 al • - -- EAST --t (� c Iv fl G lb - - - - 2 I t.. O I L 1 in N 11 •r ° 12 r 1 -- -EAST - - J • in 1 - 130.00 , - - -- p �i F. L N66• 1 1 2 N ry �^' - - 130.2 t - • -' - 1 3 ow -014 1 UTILITY EASEMENT -�� 6 S. r0 •1� 133.3 I DOC.1964131 a OTHERS E. KING AVENUE p•lae.ea, �:' 14� ,.ti' �`��' 4 o �, � 3 - _ �e as a.� �'�`► �'�' " 0 Z a I pp Aso 0 6� R i' 1 •► p • O • 0 1 a .� 0 O ei ' EAST :J0 ,� ti o0 o.OY- % ,� o . d 4 -� Lc % • I io ° Z�: "� *� •` � o `'•rim. O �� 2 0' 1�;� ` T •pOl] I t4 W 1_ I ~ ` ry2 43 L I6J ry v Zo e �° I 1 d • _ :. `` ` 1 P�,,,o �.A C1% `16 L in 'T; �oUTLOT 8 f N I I 2 41 a 1$ 9 t. ♦` `1 �-w �P� O•�ME�t�\� i v t i r4 Ix 74S 34 i. Sy ? ` 1 d o q9 -� - - -♦ Z 1 �o \ cen 87.57, 0111 1ss.ea- �.,1• '� 22 e.s7- o MAILAND e776o ° ROAD 439A5 0 o 1 1 N 88 42 "E c 1317.45 F t i A r) 60, � r . . • , .. -. - r .. . r - r -- - • VISTA HILLS A PARK Crestview 3rd Addition ('final plat proposal) 5 Attachment 2 4 N estm I i Aoti on by C MEMORANDUM LPndorsec�,.,, TO: City Manager Modifie :. FROM: Thomas Ekstrand-- Associate Planner Rejected. SUBJECT: Z one . . Change (F - BC, SC - BC, F- SC) D ate LOCATION: County Road D, East of White Bear Avenue APPLICANT: Clyde Fish, Eldon Morr and, Eugene Wil OWNER: Robert Hajicek PROJECT Shops of Carousel DATE: November 25, 1985 SUMMARY Request 1. Applicant's request: Approval of a zone change from F, farm residential to BC, business commercial for the proposed Shops of Carousel site. 20 S taf f request: Approval of a zone change f rom F and SC, shopping center to BC for the Denny's and Firestone sites. 3.. Staff request: Approval of a zone change from F to SC for the northerly portion of the Plaza 3000 north annex property. Refer to the applicant's statement on page l l and the maps on pages 6 and 7 Rezoning these properties as proposed would meet the intent of the land use plan. The following are the reasons for staff's proposed zone changes: 10 The undeveloped site between Skipper's a,nd Carousel -- rezoning would eliminate an isolated F zone. 2. Denny's and F i restone -- these are nonconforming uses that do not meet the requirements of the SC district. Section 36 -172 (1) and (2) read as follows: "(1) The proposed development under Section 36 -171 of this division shall be constructed in accordance with an overall plan which shall be designed as a single architectural unit with appropriate landscaping, and shall provide initially for the construction of either a minimum of seven thousand five hundred (7,500) square feet of floor area, or a minimum of six (6) of the uses listed in Section 36 -173 of this division, as permitted i,n a shopping center district. "(2) - The total area shall be not less than two (2) acres." I Neither building was designed as a single architectural unit with - the shopping center and neither building. meets the minimum -floor area or site area requirements. An auto repair use is not allowed in . the SC district. Rezoning to BC would permit both" uses. -� 30 Plaza 3000 north annex - -the northerly part of this building is in an F, farm zone and would, therefore, be a nonconformin g , use. Rezoning to SC would solve this problem. Recommendation 10 Adoption of the rezoning on page 13 approving zone change from g g F, farm r es i dent i al and SC, shopping center to BC, business commercial. In addi tion to the findings required b code approval Y , pP is recommended on the basis that the proposed change would g ive properties that are presently developed commercially, the proper zoning classification and would eliminate multiple zonin 1 class ifications and nonconforming uses on some of these sites. 20 Adoption of the resolution on page 16 approving zone change e g from F, farm residential to SC, shopping center. In addition to the fnd ings required by code, approval is recommended on the basis that the proposed change would give the shopping center the proper commercial zoning classification. 2 v 1 L C LJ C w7 1. J_ JL L 1 V L I 1. Site size: 4.42 acres. 20 Existing use: undeveloped. 3. Existing easements. Standard Oil pipeline-and the Northern States Power high power line easements. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: County Road D and Perkins restaurant. Southerly: Firestone and the Plaza 3000 north annex. Easterly: The Learning Tree day -care center and undeveloped commercial land. Westerly: a single dwelling, A & K Auto Repair, Hardee's, Taco Bell Chester's and Skipper's. Past Action 10 -1 -84: Council rezoned the Skipper's restaurant site from F to BC. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 1. Land use plan designation: SC, service commercial. 20 The SC designation is "oriented to facilities which are local or of community -wide scale. While a full range of commercial uses is permitted in this district, certain types of facilities which may be of high- intensity nature, such as fast -food restaurants, discount sales outlets, gas stations, and light industrial uses, should be permitted subject to specific performance guidelines. The objective of establishing this district is to provide for a wide variety of commercial uses, compatible with the character and developer of the neighborhoods in which they are located." . 300 Zoning: existing - -F and SC; proposed - -BC and Sc. 40 Section 36 -485 of the zoning ordinances states that for the planning commission and city council to approve a zone change, the g � Y shall base the approval on findings one through four in the resolution. 3 Jc Attachments 10 Location Map 29 Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Proposed Zoning 4. Maplewood Heights Neighborhood Land Use Plan 50 Site Plan 60 Shops of Carousel--artist's conception 70 Written statement -- project description 80 Resolution (F and SC to BC) 90 Resolution (F to SC) 4 • K L . 13 C ar 1: GALL LOCATION MAP 5 Attachment 1 4 N • r o w l w A & K Auto Repai r ..County. Road D • 75 , 1 X39• C1 Hardee 's .:;:•::•:•:::::. �• �: �: :: r :: T : i .'I� :•:::: • ;• • •�`I��i • Q �� I �•: • :• .i • i ::::: �:: • :i'r�i • • : :• ••..::•:.. •r:.•r� ... 4 . : �. :•�•.•.• :: earning T re e 8/ • � � � • :•: �::•: i : � ii • :• :�'' 'i i •• �•• fir. 0 0 Taco Bel 1 :.�::.: :.:.: :: •• .:.. :. Chester s _ ... • :...:: �.. �.. .� ... _ omm ..— — .. .. •„ ::.•::: :::...:::: :. :: . gr :M :4ki•f►r.�r w� wu.; % �.. �.... �. �........ 4 �.., amm an '•:. . x.11.15 Skipper .,.; . •.. . • .: ;::. X X.- ::• • :: •: :•: •: '•: '•: •::•::: ' . * •.: •.•: •. •..; ... :; ::: : :• :•.•:. :�: . . .. . . . . .. X. • :: • ;: is • • �: :::••• •:•: • !; •• • •• •; • •:• :Y: 1 ►- ti ar • 27 0 _ J 90.3/ 1 00 -. 9 x•2 ;o iDenny Plaza 3000 North Annex n :�, ,• sra�3 • j ` r R _ ' � , � •o � � r ne � /18./.x'• r � F-iresto : 7v• �i .,' 3� o 6.9 • Q 7 S I 06 ' N R S7 L 7 r B.S Q 6.1 19C r1 J ° SAP A !l v CD Its ca r ' n (v ; / 4j Z: ``� • PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP EXISTING Carousel Site 4 N & X Autc Re ounty Road D _M 7r. A - - -- M to q MAD M Ice 7.4.: Z39 3 % 1990 -Hardee S j % -X -7 * 10. fie, n4�4_j ....... 0 X _X..: YX Learnin Tree e- o XOX.M.Ox. : ta. Xe (. Taco. Bel — Zl- j 4 540. 40 Chester's % 4#C* 8. L4 .......... 3NIL S - T C) . .. .... ... Ott . ........ 1 � low am 40 Sktoper' s ... rri w y C " y AAWWW to o A- dM� Mo R ; iDenn y 6 Ita "left Plaza 3000 North Annex 1. 0. f P 0 1- /Ire . 41 . Firestone wAr 6. 19C L To 5_1Z I low cq ca PROPOSED ZONING Carousel Site 7 Attachment 3 4 T T a J 4 4 I �J, t � , = n N h i x _ of -- w act SITE PLAN 9 Attachment 4 N COUNTY ROAD 0 T T a J 4 4 I �J, t � , = n N h i x _ of -- w act SITE PLAN 9 Attachment 4 N / . g o oll SHOM i � 1 Of CAR(Y MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA I EUDM MCKIR"/ARCHITECTS, MC. 2199 FOURTH STREET ' WHfTE BEAR LAKE, MINNESOTA $* 1 10 (412).426-3287 OCT 11 19M • - . WILDWOO D PARK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION STATEMENT TO, SUPPORT RE'ZONI NG APPLICATION It is the intent of the applicant to develop said site into an upscale Theme . shopping cull, to be sold as individual ' retail condominium units to prospective retail clients • The proposed theme for this project .will: be -the. carousel and the carousel animal, which are found in amusement parks world wide, and whose origin can be traced back to the 17th Century. The carousel took Its place in the very beginnings of our own country when major metropolitan areas established their transit systems, and many of the first amusement parks were created* The name of this shopping center will be "CAROUSEL"* The subject property to be. developed is located south of Co • Rd* D and approximately 312 feet east of the intersection of Coo Rd* D and White Bear . Avenue, in the City of Maplewood* Existing businesses -to the north of the site and Coo Rd• D consist of an Amoco Standard gas station. Perkins and the Bnerald -Inn• All of the land lyin west of this site is zoned BC (Business & Commer- cial District , or. SC (Shopping Center District ) and has a comet do ercial use comprised of the following businesses: M & K Auto Service, Hardee' s, Taco Bell, Chesters Family Restaurant, Skipper's Seafood.' n Chowder House and Denny ' s Restaurant. To the south of said site is -.the Firestone Car Service and Plaza 3000 N. ,annex. To the east the Learning Tree Early Childhood Center and approximately 2 acres of undeveloped land zoned LBC (Limited Business & Commercial District) • This site, and the area to the Maplewood Mall area* indicates this site and the (Service Commercial Center) the definition of that land surrounding it, are closely aligned The City of Maplewood land use plan area surrounding it are designated SC • The proposed use falls clearly within use designation• The Maplewood gall, and surrounding commercial areas, are now in the process of change and further developments The construction J - of the St* John's Hospital complex; the conversion of Powers to a Donaldson' s Department Store= the proposed addition to the Maple- wood Mall; and the establishment of a third major department store anchor to the Mall, are all giving evidence that the Maplewood Mall has "arrived"* while food service in and around the Maplewood Mall is abundant, in the form of numerous fast food type operations, we. t feel the. Mall area would benefit from a fine quality, sit- din w ing restaurant, with liquor. Such a food establishment is now being sought to anchor "CAROUSEL" • The remaining retail shops are expected to offer goods and services in the medium to hi h medium price range, and might consist of such establishments as various men and women's ��; Attachment 7 r clothiers, Jewelers, flower sho ...art alle . bouti- ue P � � Q s, croissant shop, card shop, crystal shop and country store, et.c.,.. In general the development objective is to - establish a shoppin g center that will be a step up from the various strip malls that are now found in the area. The proposed structure for this development will - b ' e of quality construction attractive and unique • To further the i denti t of the proPct, and provide unique. identification for mail service and police and fire protection, the developers will seek to es-- tabl i sh the names of Carousel Court and Carousel Lane for the private streets serving "CAROUSEL* � �L • It is not expected that the development of t ' P his site well require any • expense on the part of the City f M to i y � pr vide utilities s Water i s available on the site Sanitary sewer and storm sewer are available within. 240 feet in ,oriel St. The developers will' seek to" work with Skip s Ches PP � e s, Taco Bell and Hardee' . s to establish - lan walkway and walkwa s to enhance the i.r rear yards, and encourage pedestrian traffic between "CAROUSEL" and those White Bear Avenue ' restaurants. The Northern States over line and t . ' line P he oil pipe line that cross this property to the south, along with the limited visibility th i y f e s to to white Bear Ave*, Woodlyn and Arzel stre.ets are detre- ..mental characteristics, which we feel this project can . overcome • The site could easily subeumb to such uses as a used car a lott self service laundry parking lot,.job printing stablishment or what ever. I g . , at In terms o f esthetics and upgrading of the immediate comm- ercial area, and increased property value for real estate tax a purposes, "CAROUSEL" i s undoubtly the best use for this property* We believe this is an excitin project f its citizens, prospective retail clients � P � or the. C' ity of Maplewood, i and Map lewood r p ood Mall itself• we pray the City Council will look favorabl upon � a PP this zone lication. P 12 . Pursuant -to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council in said city on the day of 1985 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: w ,:.The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Clyde Fish, Eldon Morrison and Eugene Wilson initiated a rezoning from F, farm residential to BC, business commercial for the fol lowing- described property: 1 . Property legally described as: Commencing at the inter- sections of the North l i n e of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2. Township 29, Range 22 and the North -South half line of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, thence southerly at a distance of thirty -three feet (3 3 ') to the beginning; thence westerly along the South 1 i ne of County Road D, a distance of two ' hundred seventeen and two hundredths feet (217.02); thence southerly a distance of six hundred fifteen and ,,fifteen hundredths feet (615.15 to the N 89 degrees 32' 02" W line and then easterly along the N 89 degrees 32' 02" W line a distance of two hundred twenty -one feet (221.00 to the North - South half line of Section 2, thence North a distance of six hundred fifteen and fifteen hundredths feet (615.15 to the beginning point. Subject to easements in favor of Northern States Power Company and American oil Company, 2. Property legally described as: Commencing at the inter- section of the North line of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2 Township 29, Range 22 and the North -South half line of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, thence southerly, a distance of 33 feet to the point of beginning; thence easterly along the southern line of County Road D a distance of ninety and thirty -one hundredths feet (90.31) , thence southerly along a 1 i ne parallel to the North -South half line of section 2, a distance of six hundred fifteen and fifteen hund red the feet (615.15 thence westerly along the N 89 degrees 36' 05 W line, a distance of ninety and thirty -one hundredths feet (90.31 ; thence southerly along a line parallel to the North -South half line of .Section 2, a distance of six hundred fifteen and fifteen hundredths feet (615.15 thence westerly along the N 89 degrees 36' 05" W line, a distance of ninety and thirty -one hundredths feet (90-31 thence northerly along the North -South half line of Section 2, to the point of beginning, Subject to easements in favor of Northern States Power Company and American Oil Company, 13 Attachment 8 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood residential and SC, shopping center following described property: initiated a rezoning from F, farm to BC, business commercial for the 1. Unplatted lands: The South 100 feet of the North 10 acres of the East . twenty acres of the North * Half of the Northwest Quarter east of White Bear Avenue, except the . East 360 feet; the South 10 acres o.f the East 20 acres of the North Half , of the Northwest Quarter lying :north of' the North line _.of Woodlynn Avenue and East of White Bear Avenue,.except the East 360 feet, in Ramsey County, Section 2, Townsb �ip 29, Range 22. 20 That part of the following - described parcel lying easterly of the westerly 379.35 feet thereof: That part ..of the North 10 acres of the East 20 acres of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the Easterly right-of- way l i n e of White Bear Avenue and the North line of the South 100 feet of said North 10 acres; thence easterly along said North line of the South 100 feet, a distance of 309.40 feet; thence northerly at a right angle, 155.94 feet to a point on a line parallel with and distant 493.50 feet south of the North line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 2, thence westerly along said parallel line to the easterly right -of -way line of White Bear Avenue; thence southerly along said right -of -way line to the point of beginning. 3. Unplatted lands: The West 181.87 feet of the East 360 feet of the South 100 feet of the North 10 acres of the East 20 acres of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter; and the West 181.87 feet of the East 360 feet of the South 10 acres of the East 20 acres of that part north of the North line of Woodlynn Avenue in said half- quarter (subject to road and easements) in Ramsey County, Section 2, Township 29, Range 22. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by Eugene Wilson, pursuant.to Chapter 36, Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by Commission on November 4, 1985. The p to the city council that said rezoning Clyde Fish, Eldon Morrison and Article VII of the Maplewood the Maplewood Planning lanning commission recommended be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 1985 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The counc rl also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described rezoning be on the basis of the following findings of fact: 14 1, The proposed change i.s consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of - the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3:. The proposed change will serve the - .best ..interests and' conveniences of the . commun.ty, where applicable and the public welfare. 40 The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of ._public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. 5. The proposed change would give properties that are presently developed commercially the proper commercial zoning classification and would eliminate multiple zoning classifications on some of these sites. Adopted this day of , 1985. Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of 1985 with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this rezoning. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city Y this day of , 19850 City Clerk City of Maplewood, 15 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the c i ty council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on . the day of 1985 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The-following members were absent WHEREAS,-the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F, farm residential to SC, shopping center for the following- described property: 1. Unplatted lands: The South 100 feet of the North 714.15 feet of the West 90.31 feet of the Northeast Quarter of Section 2 , Township 29, Range 22; 2 . Unplatted lands: The South 33.18 feet of the North 724.51 feet of the East 206 feet of the West 296.31 feet of the Northeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, subject to road; 3* Unplatted lands: The South 100 feet of the East 178.13 feet of the North ten acres of the East 20 acres of the . North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22 in Ramsey County This property is also known as the Plaza 3000 north annex, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows.: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on November 4, 1985. The planning commission 'recommended to the city council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 1985 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also. considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis-of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code,, Attachment 9 16 f 2 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included i.n the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded, 30 The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences .of of the. community., where -'applicable icable and the public' � P -welfare, 4 The-. proposed change would have no negative effect upon the l:ogi ca,l:, off.ici ,, and , economical -extension of public services and facilities, such as public''water, sewers, police and fire protection ..and schools. 5. The proposed change would give properties that are resentl P y developed commercially the proper commercial zoning classification, Adopted this day of , 1985 Seconded by Ayes- - STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY } SS. ) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of , 1985 with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this rezoning. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1985. City Clerk City of Maplewood, 17 . C .000 0 4 TO: FROM SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: A o tion by Council En dorse d MEMORANDUM Modifie R Q eo ted._.�„ City Manager Date -- Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner Conditional Use Permit County Road C. East of Keller Parkway -Northwestern Bell Rudolfo Gonzales Telephone Equipment Buildings November 12, 1985 SUMMARY Request Approval of a conditional use permit to construct a telephone equipment building. 10 The building will be 16 by 17 feet in size. The exter will be brick with a gently sloping gable roof, 2. Refer to the letter on page 9. The applicant's letter also refers to two additional sites, which are located on south McKnight Road. The applicant has since dropped these sites . o , PP from their consideration for telephone equipment building sites. 3. The proposed site is a portion of a lot presentl Y platted for a single - family dwelling. The applicant is proposing to purchase this site upon approval of a lot division by the city for the recombination of the lots as shown on page 6. Comments The proposed building would not be a hinderence to public health, safety, convenience or we lfare. It would be smaller than a typical one car garage, and being brick, would have an attractive exterior. Recommendation Adoption of the resolution on page 8 approving a conditional use permit for the proposed 16 by 17 foot telephone equipment building, based on the findings in the resolution. 'The conditional use permit is contingent upon the app 1 i cant, or the property owner, applying for and obtaining approval for the splitting and recombination of the lots in the Gonzalez Addition to create this site. BACKGROUND Site Description 1. Gross lot size: 19,900 square feet. 20 Lot size: 40 x 100 feet--4 square feet 30 Existing use: undeveloped Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: County Road C and single dwellings . g Southerly: single dwellings Easterly: an undeveloped single - dwelling lot and the old Bever Brothers landscaping urser site. g Y Westerly: single dwellings PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 10 Land use plan designation: RL 2 Zoning: R -1 Ordinance Requirements 110 Section 36 -437 (2) states conditional use permits may be issued by the city council in any zoning district for public uti 1 ity, public service or public building uses in any district, when found to be necessary for the public health, safety, convenience or welfare. 20 Section 36 -440 states the application for a conditional use permit shall include a site plan, showin g the kind of .conditional use proposed, its location on the property, landscaping and screening improvements, location of utility improvements, and ingress and egress from public roads. s The council may condition the granting of the perm. i t upon adherence to the site plan approved at the public hearing, . 3. Section 36 -442 (b) states approval of a conditional use permit shall be based on the ten f i n d i n g s listed in the resolution, (findings one through ten) plus any additional findings the council finds to be applicable. 40 Section 36 -22 (d) does not require curbing or a parking g p g lot as small as the one proposed, 2 t JC Attachments le Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 39 Lot Split Proposal 4. Site Plan 50. Photograph of the proposed structure .60 Applican-t's letter dated 9 -26 -85 70 Resolution 3 a F F C • MI F MI CITY OF • BE A AVE M .N Pte' G � � Q' 't R � j f J . ... �........ R v' I �00NT Y R /O -`• f R F \ ► . R PU D �. / J u • t r , N F MI R M W (� F F F LLJ R • M I Bc R F Ml •� t M I MI MI MI t� F � TRUNK MI • Fr MI S�!_ .AYE. •� - -- - - ' HK R2 . --_ — ;; • R LELAND q F F - (R2} -- -- R A� _ _e R E F iycTi t�� WE t •' RKE AVE �' }� BURK R F — R AJ a �' 1 R E , ,k, ti 14 2 I.:32J - E -A-4 (4 O c� R AY _. ✓ n 1 ~ I Y K MA AY! F vi .. l W F # R2 LL v , r a n RYAN . _ �ArA�ll I LBC A VE R ; B 4 ' r _ HEM r A VE, ( / NE •v N FR s • + • 8 :: I "'� 4 -1 F 8C , l.. •:RC �, II r .-p ____ . l F l d R L R 3 tr i t �' s r ' R R i w ar R l . R3 _ 97 F r R p - J Fl E �- LOCATION MAP Attachment one J • ttt>� • . •. 1 7T /490 2634 3 to 6 ti 5 k w 8 4-2626 - . 84a40, 9 9e 1616 3` • ' 400 f -341) 1YY11 Bell vml purchase • 45 sc this site. 2600 - Old Bever Brothers 0 a Nursery Site MR r , t 0J . s• / 0 0 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 5 iN 0 4 °. o . °• 9 90 � o � U ri F 96 310 .6 o/ 2 4 o a • r 9 E A 5 E �a �NAGE Qo //�.,�9 vb A R h � 7 � 8 1 99 • ac o 1 �' " 14 -,, w 12 c e o� 15 • a 45 � p 1 • 17 18 ti p►. , 2 0 8-c Co �� /* O f 20 � ' J � 13T'_ •, . 47ac � - - C s AGE �\ ., N A �, N j) J AN , s PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 5 r ACIA / � �� i I cam b" vww%w W C&Mw of SI t T Mm Mft of Mw 1/•1 of Safi" few 04 41 69 IN T \1-* 453-52 ROAD C, _._ �, 2 C.OUN R C OUTWT A 1 3 J? 39 yo x 00 & �Y!ACM 20 3 &mum wausew 104. • cc w 20\ 20� 33 IM 300 �� / '�•�j IGO 1. 400 PROPOSED LOT CONFIGURATIONS LOT SPLIT PROPOSAL • Proposed NW Bell Site Attachment Three 4 f�abn 90 TZBK am $I kw 11•1 0 $"u" 9 .,, Too 1%0 'NT\"f 2 ROAD %.0 V 1 453.5 C: � _._ OWMOT A 41 I- V COUNTY R OAD C C b ACM 20 it 3 t2&27 HIM-" • wt EXISTING LOT 4 5 CONFIGURATIONS J - to w -4 00 20'• 20 300 0 0 0 50 50# ,, 4W ,� o r ACIA / � �� i I cam b" vww%w W C&Mw of SI t T Mm Mft of Mw 1/•1 of Safi" few 04 41 69 IN T \1-* 453-52 ROAD C, _._ �, 2 C.OUN R C OUTWT A 1 3 J? 39 yo x 00 & �Y!ACM 20 3 &mum wausew 104. • cc w 20\ 20� 33 IM 300 �� / '�•�j IGO 1. 400 PROPOSED LOT CONFIGURATIONS LOT SPLIT PROPOSAL • Proposed NW Bell Site Attachment Three 4 CoU NTH � 4ti L o G7ou�2d le,� 74Jc��j , IL f SEP S 0 1985 SITE PLAN Attachment Four N ` R a E-9 E: R""r W C:) V'611 I-PkE: t%J.. RE)AK. ESTATE BROKER . 535 Mont»~ose ''K_ane St~ Paul Minnesota 55116' `Telephone (612) 698--8460 ' September 26, 1985 'Planning Department City of Maplewood ' Maplewood, Minnesota Gent lemen: Northwestern Bell Telephone Company needs three sites in Maplewood for small (16 x 17 equipment buildings, one on County Road C just east of Keller Parkway, and two on McKnight Road, one north of Linwood and the other south of Highwood. The telephone cables connecting the serving .central office to these areas will terminate in these building, and the equipment will greatly increase the capacity of the cables, thereby enabling Bell to serve Additional customers in both Maplewood and St. Paul, Bell has retained me* to locate and arrange for - the - acquisition of these sites, The three sites have now been identified and arrangements made to purchase, lease, or secure an easement to the necessary property, subject to permission from the City of Maplewood to use the properties for the desired purpose. As all three are zoned residential, Conditional Use Applications are being submitted. This letter is the statement of intended use accompanying those applications. The buildings would be unattended, and would require a visit by a technician perhaps once a week. The contents would be entirely solid state electronic gear, except for the ventiIation fan. Consequently, there would be no noise, odor, or other inconvenience to the neighborhood. No sewer . nor water connections would be required, so the only utility' needed would be electricity" The telephone cable entrances would be underground= Because of these factors, and because the the site would be landscaped and well maintained, I cannot believe the installations would have any adverse effect on the value of adjoining properties. Sincerely, R. W. Dokken' `^ Attachment s� 9 �,. Pursuant to.' call and notice thereof a regular meetin g of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly � y and held in the council chambers in said city on the day f 1985 at 7 Y The following members were present: - ~ The following members were absent WHEREAS, Northwestern Bell Telephone Company initiated a P Y conditional use permit to construct a 16 by 17 foot equipment buildin at the following- described property: The East 40 feet of the North 100 feet of Lot B 4, lock 1, Gonzales Addition. WHEREAS, the procedural history of.this conditional use p ermit is as follows: 10 This conditional use permit was initiated by Northwestern Bell, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 20 This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on , 19850 The lannin commission P g recommended to the city council that said permit be . 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearin g on 1985 Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity o be heard and resent written statements. Y P atements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and plannin g commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings -of -fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan P P a.nd with the purpose and standards of this chapter, 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare 3* The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4e The use would not depreciate ro ert values, p P Y 50 The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises , glare smoke dust odor, fumes, g me , water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 1 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7 . The use would be serviced by essential public servi-ces., such as'streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. -80 The use would not create excessive additional requirements .at :.._publi.c cost for- .:public..:facil.iti-es.,and services; and would not be detrimental to the- welfare of the city. 916 The use would preserve and incorporate the site" s natural and scenic features into the development °design. 10 The use would cause minimal adverse environmental* effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 110 Adherence to the site plan, dated September r 30, 1985, unless a change is approved by the city's community design n review board. 2 The applicant, or the property owner, shall apply 1 f or and obtain approval of the splitting and recombination of the lots in the Gonzales Addition to create this site. Adopted this day of , 1985* Seconded by Ayes- - STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersigned; being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that y y I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the - day of 1985, with the original on file in my .office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to ,,a conditional use permit. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 19859 City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 11 t : 1 MEMORANDUM Action by Council. TO: City Manager Endorse FROM: Associate Planner-Johnson SUBJECT: Conditional Use-Permit od.ie . LOCATION: 2280 Stillwater Avenue Rej.ecterl APPLICANT: Virginia Jensen Date .OWNER: Beaver Lake Church DATE: November 13, 1985 . SUMMARY Request Approve a conditional use permit (CUP) to operate a preschool P p 1 at Beaver Lake Church, Proposal 1. Refer ' to the enclosed letter of request on page 5. q P g 2. Licensing has been granted b the Minnesota Y Department of Public Welfare for two sessions of twenty children each ages g 2 1/2 to 6 years. RecommPnda t- i nn Approve the resolution on page 6 to authorize Beaver eaver Lake Church to offer a preschool program for one ear, consisting o Y . g f two sessions of twenty children each. If no unresolved nuisance conditions exist st at the end of one year, council may renew the P ermit, f BACKGROUND Surrounding Land Uses . North: Stillwater Road,. Across the street are single dwell in s. g East: A 186 -unit multiple dwelling development (Maple Ridge Estates that is under construction, South: A thirty -foot wide strip of vacated right -of -wa y that is owned by the Maple Ridge Estate's management. Across this property is a single dwelling and undeveloped property planned for a storm water pond and high density residential use. West: McKnight Road. Across the street are single dwellin s Paul, in St. g g Past Actions Council has approved similar permits for Holy Redeemer Church (2555 Hazelwood Avenue), Presentation Church of the Virgin Mary (1735 Kennard) and for Montessori Day Care Centers, Inc. (1060 Sterling Street -- Beaver Lake School), Planning 1. Land use plan designation: C, church 2. Zoning: R -1, residence district (single dwelling) g 39 Compliance with land use laws: A. Section 36 -66(3) allows "churches, public, parochial and private schools, or other schools, by special permit from the city council" in R -1 districts. B. Section 36 -438 (b) requires ten findings for approval of a conditional use permit. Refer to the resolution on page Fire Marshal and Building Official All life-safety and building code requirements have been complied with. f Procedure 10 Planning commission recommendation 2. City council decision following a public hearing jw Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line Map 3. Letter of justification 4. Resolution 2 F R3 R3 AVE _ td (R2) F F R 3 t, IDAHO AV E R CL R R F J Ml . R2) kpuDj Ml M2 MA RD r ..! R3 a R 3 N w� F R I F r z ., NC .(�01 •R3 R2 �. R3 r pu, MARYi. AND R AVF R • ( PUD) R DER B �`• .� F LBC • c C MA GNOLIA AVE A F BE � • E `1 AK Ln R a I BC Q a 2 z �, R W �z �. . E R AVE Y` � -- HARVESTER r AVE r C11 R O R Tit t..WA1 A� i c tiq AV . BRAND AVE P3 F R 7T W R L. &4 F C �, F R . R LB R R ' F F allk iA AV F. R 3 R -� BC R - W Q F— • N R - 3 R L� �R '. f L Al MI ' .R R MI 8 C T LOCATION MAP 3 Attachment 1 4 N s N` 3 2 CQ1 19 Co I 1p� t5 31 rd (12 4P qk l oin) 0 Ge INC- "Ale j ..,� `,. ► 4.c� � (n r; c� ( ` �. � *ci � U � � : � �,� � c�� c...� ( ; � i X71 a Z� b C. N - 0 2307 2293 2277 �.T - �r.- 4 30 39. 404 T ' C " L 1 ' ' ° o , �v (3.7_5 .} 01 0 M x2c � Al.. (/3) A it \ 4 .4/ N \ V BEA14 h A K F_ LU ?N. H. MAPLE RIDGE ESTATES T� J ,• ,n �, — -- - APARTMENTS �- (under construction) %.J -� p TOTAf i 2C3327 Q .. - 6 0 4 L•�' I 82 21385LCo ,� Srj T• .. _ 1 37. G!5 � z 33 ' 840 5 oa.�. n o Bz 2�s 21.4.5 4-4 E, 14 to , o . J -3 o 8540. fa �'. Ac. ( . 7 / o 6 (43 Ln 0.) 7• �� 2 KI �•Fi9.� / �) 1. oo do �'► z L n toz 7 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 Attachment 2 4 N heaver Lake Lutheran Church. 2280 STILLWATER AVENUE, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55119 Beaver Lake Lutheran Church is starting a Preschool. It will be held,on Tuesdays and Thursdays in the mornings from 9:00 - 11':00. There was formerly a Montessori preschool on the location until they outgrew the facility, two years ago. Students are made up mainly of church members and children from the neighborhood. The State of Minnesota Department of Human Services are licen- sing agents. Parking will not present any problem as there is an adequate parking lot, with entrances on McKnight and Stillwater Avenue. The preschool would only involve 15 to 20 cars. There is a play area provided right on the property. Main use would be inside the building. The building has been inspected by Maplewood Fire Marshall, Health official, and building permit zoning person. Virginia _Jensen, Director Beaver Lake Lutheran. Church Preschool Pastors; Gerald W. Smith — Conrad E. Greenquist Church Office: 739 -3092 --- 739 -8306 ri a��- ar � Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the city council of , the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly. called and - held in the counci 1 chambers i said city on the day of 1,985 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Beaver Lake Church initiated a conditional use permit to operate a preschool program at the following - described property: Parcel A, Registered Land Survey No. 21 together with Parcel A Registered Land Survey No. 137 This property is-also known as 2280 Stillwater Avenue, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is .as follows: 19 This conditional use permit was initiated by Beaver Lake Church, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances, 20 This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood � P Planning Commission on November 18, 1985. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be 3. The Maplewood City Council held a ublic hearing g on 1985 Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of' the following findings-of-fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 40 - The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, 6 n a- 1,, .- n smoke dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run- vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. The use would generate-only minimal vehicular tra.ffic.on . local streets and shall not create traffic congestion; unsafe access or arkin needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. P g The use would be serviced by essential public services , such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 100 The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. .Adopted this day of , 1985. Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of 1985, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permit. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1985. '' City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 7 Aotion.by Council: MEMORANDUM Endorsed,..- odif i e City g M a n a e r, ReJ ecte Associate Planner* Date Code Amendment - -Smal 1 e r Single-Dwelling Lots November 8, 1985 SUMMARY Request w. 1. Amend the zoning code for small lot single - dwelling properties to. a. Reduce the minimum lot width requirement. b. Increase the minimum side yard area for each lot. 2. Eliminate an inconsistency between-the zoning and subdivision codes concerning the minimum lot width for double - dwelling lots . Reason for the Request 1. At council's annual meeting with the HRA, council directed the HRA to. prepare the code amendments necessary to promote smaller lot single- dwelling development, such as the willow Creek development in Shoreview. 20 The lot width changes are being considered at this time, because Ed Cave and Sons, Inc. has applied for a planned unit development with sixty -foot wide single - dwelling lots. Comments One of the objectives of the comprehensive plan states "The city should continue to develop land use regulations which encourage a Planned approach to housing areas by providing a variety of lot sizes and housing densities which compliment the area's land use plan and the desired dwelling types" (page 12 -8) . City code permits smaller single - dwelling lots of 7,500 square feet in areas planned for residential medium density use. The problem is that these lots are required to have at least 75 feet of lot width- -the same as conventional single- dwelling lots, According to area developers, this requirement discourages the development of 7,500 square -foot lots, The -less attractive market appeal of a shallow, .100-foot deep lot (75 x 100 = 7, 500) eliminates or significantly reduces any cost advantage that could be gained by developing 7,500 square -foot lots. Ken Gervais, of Castle Design and Development, believes that 75 x 100 -foot lots cannot, on average, be sold for more than a 60 x 120 -foot lot, even though the 75 -foot wide lot costs at least $1,800 more to improve with street and utilities, assuming the land and financing costs are the same. This may explain why no 7,500 square -foot lot subdivisions have been developed in the six years since council amended the city code to allow them. S The combined minimum side yard areas for small lot single- dwelling properties, should be increased from ten to- fifteen feet, if the lot width is reduced as proposed. This would reduce the potential for overcrowding should a developer choose to build- from side yard. setback to side yard setback. This situation is very likely as most housing styles that are currently being proposed include an attached garage. None of the developers contacted oppose this requirement. Aink rnmmeA nr7 F- i nr Approve the enclosed ordinance on page 11. BACKGROUND Past Actions 7 -5 -79: ' Council amended the R -2, double- dwelling district to permit 75 -foot wide, 7,500 square -foot single- dwelling lots. Planning 1. Policy criteria from the plan: a. Page 18 -30: The RM, residential medium density classifi- cation is designed for such housing types as single dwellings on smaller lots double dwellings, town houses and mobile homes.. b Page 12 -5: An objective of the comprehensive plan is that the city encourage a variety .of housing types and styles and shall be flexible and remain open to development requests which are in accordance with this objective. 20 Complance with land use laws: Refer to the R -2, double-dwelling zoning district requirements on page 9 These requirements apply to double dwellings as well as small -lot single dwellings, Public Works This proposal would not have an adverse affect on existin g or planned , u t i l i t y and road systems. There would be no significant difference in the number of lots that would be permitted per acre for 60. x 120 -foot versus 75• x 100 -foot lots, assuming that the maximum density requirements are not changed. Developer Comments Several Maplewood developers were asked their opinion of this . p Each endorsed it. Four developers submitted letters of support ( see pages 4 - g) 1. HRA recommendations 2. Planning commission recommendation 3. City council first reading following a public hearing, second reading and adoption mb Enclosures: 1 -4. Developer letters of support 5. R -2 zoning code 6. Ordinance 3 mary nde rson BETTER HOMES FOR BETTER LIVING MARVIN H. ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 8901 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55420 June 13, 1985 TELEPHONE BB'I -2661 th '5 o �rrrti�r.�rr� ' 1982 Mayor John Greavu c/o Mr. Randy Johnson City of Maplewood 1902 East County Road B Map MN 55109 Dear Mayor Greavu : It is my understanding that the city of Maplewood will be considering a proposed ordinance to allow in a R -1 zoning area 60 foot lots. We are .very delighted the city is taking this step forward. It w i l l allow another small portion of the buying market the capability to purchase a new home with less lot costs and future maintenance costs due to- a smaller lot. We must keep in mind that this considered change, at least i n our ca se, w i l l not reduce the qua 1 i ty of hou s i ng , on 1 y chang i ng the p 1 acemen t of a home on a smaller lot and a l s o the style of the home. Enclosed is a copy of the development plan which we submitted to the city of Bloomington in 1984. This plan area was originally platted with eight large lots for twin ,homes. We felt the market was soft in twin homes and presented our proposal to the city of Blooming ton to plat 13 single family lots which have an average of 60 foot at the b u i l d i n g line. Some of the lots were presol d with a specific home requiring some additional footage. This gave us a little more flexibility of many home styles for each lot. In no case was a garage side yard setback and an adjacent home living area to be closer than 15 feet. A 1 iving area side yard and an adjacent 1 i v i ng area to be no closer than 20 feet. In the, case of two garages being on the same common side yard, the distance was to be no closer than 15 feet. If the f i rst garage was 5 feet from the side lot 1 i ne, the adjacent garage would have to be 1 0 feet from the line. This type of reasoning a l l o w s assurance of some open space feeling between structures. The city of Bloomington accepted our proposed p r e l i m i n a r y plat and we have almost completed construction of all the homes. The owners are very delighted with the quality of the homes. They have no reservations about the size of their l o t s . They have t o l d me that yard care is at a minimum, a l l o w i n g them freedom for other activities. If you would note on the enclosed preliminary plat, the lots directly across the street to the south have frontages from 80 foot minimum up to 95 foot. These homeowners had no objection to this plan. 4 Attachment One w. Major John Greavu June 13, 1985 Page 2 At a later date, I wi 1 1 fur-n i sh you photos of the homes that were, constructed on 60. foot lots. We thank the city staff, planning commission and council members on their .cons i derat ion of this proposed ordinance. It Is a' step forward in recognizing the , needs for housing for new families. Sincerely, MARVI N H ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION CO. Frederic E. Haas Vice Pres. Land Development FEH:Iw enc. 5 Suburban Developments TILSEN HOMES INC. Residential Construction Land Developers I June 12, 1985 Honorable John Greavu 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Ma We understand the cit is considerin a zonin ordinance chan to allow detached sin famil housin on smaller lots includin 60' wide lots and zero lot line plats. We feel this would be a useful chan in the code and that we would look seriousl at utilizin them. "Patio Homes" and other smaller lo developments have been su ccessful and have provided a g ood environment for homeowners both i the Twin Cities and across the countr Properl planned, these can be an improvement over townhomes and condominiums of similar densit We hope the Cit of Maplewood will make these alternatives available, Y trul i s A. Tilsen Tilsen Homes, Inc. JAT: jh Builders of ❑ ❑ b P 0 HOMES Attachment Two � SS q Ct A1 1014 oj hJ 6 V I It KAI KIKI COn-r A Cr_ 4 4 C DUI-%Kt 0 12no r-r-f%l Mr.Randy Johnson Associate Planner City of Maplewood 1902 E. County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 RE: 60 foot wide lots in the City of Maplewood Dear Mr. Johnson: I appreciated your request for comments regarding changing the ordinance regarding lot widths in the City of Maplewood. I don't pretend to speak for the entire development community but can comment on our companies experience with narrow lots. We have not used the zero lot line single - family detached house .arrangement. We have built homes on narrower lots, but only in subdivisions which have a variety of lot widths. That is, we have developed single -"family detached homes subdivisons that have lots ranging from 60 to 70 feet wide. This range of widths has given .us the flexability to build several style homes with conventional setbacks. Our company would make use of the 60 foot lot widths however, we almost certainly would not have an entire subdivision with lots 60 feet wide, One of the other that you mentioned was regarding sideyard setbacks. The idea of having 15 feet of total sideyard setback to be divided up by the developer makes a great deal of sense to me. My understanding that provision would allow, for example, 7 � feet . of setback on each side, under no case, less than 5 feet. I think this kind of flexability would greatly benefit home builders and developers, I appreciate the opportunity to. comment on your Proposals in your it y. S e J h eterson Di ctor of Development Attachment Three J RP : d 7 GOOD VALUE HOMES • Registered Builder • 1460 93rd Lane N.E., Blaine MN 55434 --4396 0 Phone: (6 Goff Construction 1278 E. County Rd. C Maplewood, Minn. 55109 612- 484 -2566 .Tune 10, 1985 City of.Maplewood 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 To Whom It May Concern, The idea of 60' wide lots with zero lot line yard set back has worked in other nearby communities and it can work in Maple- wood. It should be done in a multiple zoned area. It should not be done as a substitute to. the existing R1 requirements. Sincerely, v'V � Patrick W. Goff Goff Homes 8 Attachment Four DIVISION 4.11 -2 RESIDENCE DISTRICT (DOUBLE DWELLING) Sec. 36 -86. Permitted uses. In the R -2 Residence District, no building or land shall be used, and no building shall be erected, converted or structurally altered, unless otherwise provided herein, except for one or more of the following uses: (1) Any use specified in division 3 of this article, R -1 Residence District (Single Dwelling), and no other. • (2) The minimum habitable floor area for each R -2 Residence District dwelling unit shall be at least: five hundred eighty (580) square feet per efficiency or one - bedroom unit; seven hundred forty (740) square feet per two - bedroom unit; eight hundred sixty - (860) square feet per three - bedroom unit; one thousand forty (1,040) square feet per four - bedroom unit. (3) Colleges, libraries and community center buildings, any of which shall require a special permit to be issued by the city council. (Code 1965, § 905.010; Ord. No. 527, § 1, 11 -8 -82; Ord. No. 551, § 1, 9- 12 -83) Sec. 36 -87. Height of buildings. No single- or two- family dwellings shall be erected or structurally altered in an R -2 Residence District to exceed thirty (30) feet in height, measured from the front or street side grade of the site. (Code 1965, § 905.020; Ord. No. 471, § 1, 7 -5 -79) Sec. 36 -88. Lot dimensions; sewer requirements; etc. ta) No two - family dwellings shall be built or structurally altered in an R -2 Residence District on a site less than twelve thousand (12,000) square feet in area. (b) No single - family dwelling shall be built or structurally al- tered in an R -2 Residence District on a site less than seven thousand five hundred (7,500) square feet in area. c The minimum lot width in an R -2 Residence District shall be seventy -five (75) feet for interior lots and one hundred (100) feet for corner lots. (d) No single- or two - family dwelling shall be built or structur- ally altered in an R -2 Residence District on any site, unless a public sanitary sewer is available. (e) The density in an R -2 Residence District shall not exceed the maximum density permitted by the land use classification and peo- ple per unit designated in the city's adopted comprehensive plan. (Code 1965, § 90.5.030; Ord. No. 448, § 1, 7- 20 -78; Ord. No. 471, § 1 7 -5 -79) Sec. 36 -89. Front yards. Each lot in an R -2 Residence District shall have a front yard of not less than thirty (30) feet in depth facing any street or road. If 9 Attachment Five fifty (50) percent or more of the then existing dwellings having frontages on the same street or road have a predominant front yard. setback different from that specified herein, then all buildings there- after erected, altered or moved on that street or road shall conform to that predominant front yard depth, unless a different setback is approved in writing by owners of not less than fifty -one (51) percent of all the then existing buildings on that street or road within three hundred (300) feet of the proposed building location. (Code 1965, § 905.040) Sec. 36 -90. Side yards. Each lot in an R -2 Residence District shall have two (2) side yards, one on each side of the building. For every building erected or structurally altered, each side yard shall have a width of not less than five (5) feet. The foregoing requirements for side yards shall be subject to the following modifications: (1) On a corner lot, the side yard on the street side of such corner lot shall have a width of not less than thirty (30) feet. (2) A church or a public, parochial or private school shall have a side yard.of not less than fifty (50) feet on each side adjoining other property. (3) when two (2) or more adjoining lots are used as a single building site, the side yard requirements shall apply only to the outside lot lines. (Code 1965, § 905.050) Sec. 36 -91. Rear yards. (a) The rear yard for each lot in an R -2 Residence District shall have a depth equal to, or greater than, twenty (20) percent of the depth of the lot. (b) The setback for dwelling accessory buildings in an R -2 Resi- dence District shall be not less than five (5) feet from the rear lot line except that on a corner lot, a thirty -foot setback from the street side shall be the minimum. (Code 1965, § 905.060; Ord. No. 487, § § 904.060, 905.060, 6 -5 -80) Sec. 36 -92. Radio tower, antenna and flagpole setbacks. Citizen band radio towers, amateur radio towers, television an- tennas and flagpoles in an R -2 Residence District shall maintain a five -foot setback from all property lines. (Ord. No. 392 § 2,1- 15 -76) Sec. 36 -93. Building separation requirement. ' In an R -2 Residence District, separation between an accessory structure and a principal structure or another accessory structure shall be in conformance with building code requirements. (Ord. No. 487 §§ 904.090 905.080 6 -5 -80) Secs. 36 -94 -36 -105. Reserved, 10 t • ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REGARDING MINIMUM LOT WIDTHS FOR SMALL -LOT, SINGLE DWELLINGS Section 1. Sec. 36 -88 '(c) is amended to read as follows lan u ( g age underlined is to be added and language crossed out is to be deleted) : (c) The minimum lot width in an R -2, residence district for: (1) Single dwellings shall be sixty (60) feet for interior lots and eighty -f ive feet (85) feet for corner lots . (2) Double dwellings shall be ei ghty-five (_ 85) feet for interior lots and one hundred (l feet for corner lots. ...Section 2. Section 36 -90. Side yards is amended to read as follows ( language crossed out is to be deleted and language underlined is to be added) : Each lot in an R -2 residence district shall have two 2 side yards,. one on each side of the building. Every single and double dwelling shall have a side yard width of not less than five 5 feet . F ( ) or every single dwelling, with less _ than seventy -five ( feet of lot width, the total of both side yards shall be at leas fifteen (15) feet. The foregoing requirements for side yards shall be subject to the following modifications: (1) On a corner lot, the side yard on the street side of such corner lot shall have a width of not less than thirty (30) feet. (2) A church or public, parochial or private school shall have a side yard of not less than fifty (5 0) feet on each side adjoining other property. (3) When two (2) or more adjoining lots are used as a single building site, the side yard requirements shall apply pp Y only to the outside lot lines, Section 3. Sec. 36 -6 Definitions is amended to add the following language: Lot width: The distance at the building line between side property lines for interior lots and between a side property line and the opposite street right-of-way for corner lots,, Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. 11 Attachment Six a w Passed day the Maplewood City Council on , 1985. - Mayor .Attest • City Clerk Ayes -- Nays -- 12 i Aoticn by Council: MEMORANDUM Endorsed Modified Rejecte TO: C i ty Manager ))ate' FROM: Associate Planner--Jo on SUBJECT: Planned Unit Development, Street and Alle Vacations and Preliminary Plat LOCATION: English Street and County Road B APPLICANT OWNER: / Ed Cave and Sons, Inc . PROJECT: Cave's English Street Addition DATE: November 20, 1985 i SUMMARY Request 1. Approve a conditional use erm i for or p a planned unit development of 23 single- dwelling lots, including eight interior lots with less than 75 feet of width and a corner lot with less than 100 feet of width. 2. Vacate existing alley and street rights -of -way. 30 Approve a preliminary plat. Proposal 10 Refer to the preliminary plat on pa a 10 for the proposed lot g P p and street configurations. 20 A variety of interior lot widths, ranging from 60 to 88 feet g g , have been proposed to promote an assortment of housing . types and designs. 30 All of the dwellings would meet or exceed the minimum floor area requirements for single dwellings, 4. Refer to the letters of justification on P g a e 12, Reasons for the Request 1. A planned unit development is needed to: a. Permit single- dwelling interior lots with less than 75 feet of width and a single- dwelling corner lot with less than 100 feet of width. b. Eliminate the need for a rezoning to R -2 double d g , welling to permit single - dwelling lots with less than 10,000 square feet of area. 2. The street and " alley rights -of -way that would be p latted over must be vacated before the new- plat can be recorded . This proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan policies to promote innovation in subdivision and housing development design through planned unit developments, encourage the provision of a variety of housing types within neighborhoods and permit small -lot single dwellings in areas planned for RM, residential medium density use (See the planning information section.) This project would have fewer units and be more similar in character to the surrounding homes than the town house project previously Y approved for this site. Also, the narrower -lot single dwellings would front on the side and rear yards of the dwellings to the west of English Street. This situation would provide an adequate transition to the conventional sized single- dwelling properties across the street. Recommendation 1. Approve the enclosed resolution (page 14) to approve a conditional use permit for Cave's English Street Addition planned unit development to permit eight, 60 to 65 foot wide interior lots and an 85 -foot wide corner lot to be included in a subdivision of 23 single - dwelling properties. Approval is subject to: a. Compliance with the preliminary plat dated November 7, 1985 as required to be amended by council. b. The structure setbacks shall be as required in the R--2, double dwelling district. In addition, at least 15 feet of side yard area per lot shall be provided for all interior lots that have less than 75 feet of width. Also, the structures on Lots Twelve and Thirteen shall not encroach upon the 30 -foot wide utility easement required along the common property l i n e , c. Lots Two and Eighteen shall be accessed only from McAfee Circle. Approval is on the basis of the ten required findings for a conditional use permit and upon the five findings requi red for a variance through a planned unit development. (Refer to the resolution on page 14.) 20 Approval of the enclosed resolution on page 17 to vacate the street and alley rights -of -way, subject to the retention of a utility easement over the part of the Lark Avenue right -of -way that would be outside of the proposed Cave's English Street Addition, and within 15 feet, either side of the proposed water main. Approval is based upon the following find ings : a. The alley rights -of -way do not serve as a primary or secondary access to the adjoining property. b. The adjoining properties-are undeveloped and under one ownership, with general site access from County Road B and English Street. c. Replattin.g of the site, with a different street configuration,.: is necessary to eliminate the present substandard sized platted dots. 3. Approval of Cave's English Street Addition preliminary plat, subject to a. Council approval of the planned unit development by the same name. b. Submission of final grading, drainage and utility plans to P the city engineer. These plans shall be accompanied by the storm water ponding design calculations. The easement allow for one foot of elevation above the 100 -year ponding elevation. c. If the ponding easement must be increased in area, all of the lots abutting it shall have at least 7500- square feet of area, outside of the easement. d. Submission of a signed developer's agreement, with the required surety, to the city engineer for all required public q P street, ponding and utility improvements. e. Submission of a recordable quit - claim deed to the city engineer prior to requesting final tat approval to convey a P Pp y 30- foot wide storm sewer easement to the city, centered on the west line of proposed Lot One of Cave's Cope Avenue Addition, between Cope Avenue and the north line of this plat. If this easement is shown on the Cave's Cope Avenue Addition and the f i na 1 P lat is recorded before final plat approval is requested for this proposal, a.quit -claim deed will not be..necessary. f. Revise the proposed utility easement over Lots Twelve, Thirteen and Twenty -three to a 30 -foot wide easement centered on the proposed water main. The water main shall be constructed on a straight line between the tie -in in English Street and its connection with the proposed main in McAfee Circle. g. Submission of signed agreements with Northern States Power and Bell Telephone prior to final plat approval. h. Recording the underlying street and alley vacations before the final plat is recorded. 3 BACKGROUND Site Description Gross Area: 8.2 acres. Net area: 7.4 acres. Existing land use undeveloped . Easements: running east /west through the site are undeveloped portions of Lark and Laurie rights -of -way and two alley rights -of --way. Surrounding Land Uses North: a single dwelling (2252 English Street) and Cave's Cope Avenue Addition of five single - dwelling and two double - dwelling lots. Two of the single dwellings.are under construction. East: railroad right -of -way. South: County Road B. Across the street is a single dwelling (2252 English Street) and undeveloped land. West: a single dwel 1 i ng (2261 English Street) and English Street. Across the street are single - dwelling corner lots with at least 145 feet of frontage on English Street, Past Actions 7- 26 -82: Council conditionally approved the English Manor planned unit development (page g) for 72 double - dwelling and town -house units. The development included this site, Cave's Cope Avenue Addition to the north and undeveloped_ property south of County Road B. Council also conditionally approved a preliminary plat for the first phase that would have been adjacent to Cope Avenue and approved the vacation of the alley right -of -way underlying the first phase. 7- 25 -83: Council canceled the English Manor planned unit development and preliminary plat approvals. The applicant had gone out of business. No requests had been received to extend the initial one -year approval. Planning 1.0 Land use plan designation: RM, residential medium density. 2. Permitted density: 22 people /net acre. 39 Proposed density: 13.6 people /net acre (23 units). 4 4. Density approved for the English Manor development; 17.5 people /net , acre (3 8 units), 50, Policy cr i ter i a . from the plan: w• a. Page 18 -8: Residential afeas should be encouraged, planned and guided to provide a variety of housing types within neighborhoods. b. Page 18-9: Innovation in subdivision des i gn and housing development shall be encouraged through the use of devises such as cluster and planned unit development concepts. C* Page 18 -30: The RM land use class if. ication is designed for such housing types as single dwellings on small lots double dwellings, town houses and mobile homes, _60 Zoning: R -1, single dwelling To Compliance with land use laws: a. State law: Section 412 -851 of State Statutes allows a city to vacate any interest in property when the council makes a finding that "it appears to be in the public interest to do so." b. City Code: (1) Section 36 -442 requires ten findings for the approval of a p conditional use permit. (Refer to the resolution ion on page (2) Section 301 -8 (f) (1) (d) of the platting code permits single dwelling lots with "not less than 7500 square feet in area if designated as RM, residential medium density on the city land .use plan." (3) Code requires a minimum lot width of 75 feet for interior lots and 100 feet for corner lots. The applicant's proposed plat includes 50 -foot wide interior lots and an 85 -foot wide corner lot. (4) Section 36 -438 (b) states "it is the intention of this section and the other sections of this division relatin g to planned unit developments to provide a means to allow flexibility by substantial variances from the provisions of this chapter, including uses, setbacks, height and other regulations. Variances may be granted for planned unit developments provided' the five findings -that are listed in the resolution on page 14 are made. Public Works 10 The proposed pond and existing storm sewer in Cope Avenue and to the north would adequately handle the storm water from this site. No 5 further development in this area, however, should be •permitted until additional storm sewer facilities are constructed. 2. The storm sewer facilities proposed in Project 79 -8 (page 11 ) are needed to' alleviate the storm water problems in the surrounding area. This project was denied by on May 13, 1980, due to neighborhood opposition. Procedure 1. Planning commission recommendation. 20 City council decision following a public hearing. 3c Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line Map 34D English Street Town House PUD 4. Preliminary Plat 50 Gladstone Park Storm Sewer Proposal, 6. Letter of Justification 74 Resolution (CUP) 89 Resolution (Vacations) 910 Preliminary Plat ( separate attachment) 0 L • .J W P o • � R Cr Q w R �• F Mt W F w Eo�EH�u ' Y r F z F M I (R2) DEMONT R + Rn a M I R N L8C B C F J L F- R < R p L8� v' • R Q: • BC L....r -.. Q 4 $EXTAN ANE • Q �• F Mt R z R LAC F GERVA R M1 • R x 1 M I M I MI a I WANQ v Av R TR �• WAY 36 ,. . p f • I� M! C • ...� — F MI MI R • 1 1' �—• R-3C •• • �•" r R Z .. v co+Tr R R 2 RD .R ,� 1 i R -OLELA C ST -- --- a U C rF 1. _R 2) o �r+>r Q ++ „ R v F r AVE 18suoWWE R3 AVE R LT. M • F R F N, . f R BC . +' 4 R` F ; v 44 oo yf r�.L A • ` • m Ml SS �P F 02 o RYAN RY ROS 2) r F W - •.._ . (R2 �+ L BC R s ; BC N F ' FEN v~+ • FR S T C •� ! Cr AVE. • W F B C � L. 1... . P F • • + 4d' •R a z a R L R3 R� R F •• R o o AIse,E R v F F W Ro r LEY ° � W RIPE Y AVE • •� R sop A �+ aQ Y iNGSTON . � ` c C F4KE ' �'HALEN � , r R - R Z F ` R a R x BC • LAKE F �. ��. R ) £ R N R , ft y NC� a T Y OF ST. P,4a ✓ , LOCATION MAP Attachment 1 4 N to r. � vim ,� �• . � . a in x � b I I .,V 1 61171'16" zs z�1 zsl � 2,, t>; i 30: •� 1o0 N (f 1 � ;,5 ( la I 1b1 t2f It a I 9 1 q 1 7 �, t 4 1 1 2 1 1 I T61 230' 0 ► 7 � N Wwwwwwoolon AVE. ■■■ SAT 1t1s - , > •w �) A .. �-; I -: r • ., �, 1� 1 6 , )1 I N) I � I � ! j I J 1�IL�� 13) I �� • ► �- �z-� —' 1 1�• 1 27 1 2b1 2B ' Saw . ■ k , , ,, r 1 t 5 I IS 120" i 21 2L 1 t. f 24' 26 24 27 2b •r �' �- I •� I , 7 4; 1 b1A ( 2 11 nl I '1311ZI11 b ) k7 1 6 )KS 14 �j 3� I r I S( 1(I (3) 1 G� t , ► I 26 ,�tg i ea 6 �i, I 8r19 ` *, •+ 23 2 zs�x I ( I I I I( .1 1 1 tj Its 7 • .- � t� 1 1 ..' I 17 $ T4a as -§ 1 ! � { .1 ,7 I b�� A a I Z "1�1„ N19�1�' 13�I.!21.11 1 .(� I 7 f fi `its 1 ;(�) 1 1r�) 149)1 1i! 40 AA 40 t 7� " 7/ t 74 &. �4 74.6E at ROAD ---` }'- �..s, .L '_•::� I - - - - - - - - '-" -- �• - - - - - - - - -- - 764(o 40 d ° TO �,4+0 04 27w1 11 CIHU f H Io) ((71) 1 Zt � " 3 zs7 rn s- �_t►s- 1 L 1 .t. TS A r 1 1, � � I I 'isgl �� 1 „ IS 1 14 t3 IZ 111 1 � to j S + Ir� 6 s 1f ii �►tol to 40 40 IO AO OLk?nl X0 1 AO L R OAD 41 !► 1 �0 4o • , . . . . .. s i( )'(g , °j,1� ) i°+� V N '(IS)� +)j j(its)! �(t ��Ie? T"T•_...?. 7 u t12 Ita13c 1 t I 1 .1► --tom 0 �1�7 I IS 1 1 120 1 J f u 17!1 t� 1 t5) zo I.27 1 LS -r - �r I .or�i - •1 - 3�--- t-- -�: r " @. i36�9►Ir -� r '7 ( .,f� I Z_, - , IS!_14 113 I2 III lo AI (Ni) 1G/ /)�' IGa) � �! �%� 0.91 I< +'I. 10 Oo 1Os 1. 93) 1, St (4- �3) a a s � ° M ,` ., ° ♦ 4 r !n N 7 I it »7 � 2 \ 3 1d�� y 1 \ 15 (t4) F,j w� • Or) 5 . ) 6\ v 17 1.15 A J 4% -w P-4 a •e 6 R h tc tt �t so ...•..•.::..:.:... f -N : •....; ROAD to to L : :: �' ,t r' :1 to y „� , 1 4 oo '' +~ it .� { ► r'.l { {A; Icy► (!,` I;'� ► � _ SAN DH UR 5 :, r n T. L..� 12 11 's A 7 4 3 4S IS M T t .! I g D. 1 1 ,� S t , � ` t 4 1 1 13 14 -� t7 ►e Is ito R t3 t ..1� s !1 �H I/ N t V t0 is 14 Z�I ,t4 tf c � 1 0. SO40% % 01 T " i I -a.++�►�e:'”' T'�1�IYtt`ir...w .s .m«r.•,rw62.a0_. -- - SECOND o N D ...... -. _ -. - ....__N . -_.. , `• ' fir, IN A V E 1 1 ti 1. 1 1n I •, I Ll 1 7 1 u S 1 I ;� ? 1 1 N I i� I (ih.�t�11�) " I I I .{_ r+ „O N I L I '.9 1 113 i + (1 I go 19 18 1 > b ! 1 4 � •f -- _Vj.- N ec�3 ..►,� ` ✓, I1a.7 04 1 A1., t. °f 7� - ' _ v �c n . a n . : R Ka A.4 (. rs, ��I 13 I 1 I �b 117 I In la Yw{ Ji7j - t� 11127 c t r • - �. .0 � I 1,, ' tn1 LJ =,, �fi1 �itIIs 191i•ol 22�Z3icAI 1 14 15 fed ,r I I 1 i.w f 1... }. l l 'r 54 N I I I I I 1 ,cal ?6127 iAl29l A0 I I 40 I 041 T U4 �461 uile D A J s �13 ICI J 1�1`.3 1 R 'l b I > I A� .1..1. � I - ►._�..i. ��. I I I 1 1 1 1 1� 1 1 � �"'1.31z11 � t o . 4 1 VAC Al r I I I I .� i r _ t1I.IZ� I� 1 14 1� .0 1 r 1' 41 �, I ( 1 1 ( , I 1 I '.yt y I I IG 17 IA I i!7 . I n: t ') I I ► i I i Weaver Elmentar Sch '11 I Y I o o l ; 4. !' ve, n �. -� D.e I ' TrD e� ! e14� l4`L��aoL -!dQlKI(�6�► 13(1 7sa � + l ~f►O __.../° .vv L�rel�Ir ��•_.1 _) _1. t9as 1 I -�-� ° 3. 1 , L 2.49 A S It r 3 z ' , A 4 X - M q �� (�s1 11.) I �,,, (t21 1 (13) T (gal �1 �c� ^a' ►� ;: ' -� ■� ■� ""I I1 12 I 13 I 14 I 15) 1 I 0 1) (1 ?5 i 1 0 ■�11■ ■� BELM0NT -- -- - 1 4 1 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Right —of —way to be vacated outside of plat 8 Attachment 2 4 N 4p I •• - - -r- .- - _`_ 560 .• ; ••1. ? .t I t 17 1 16 , �, � z I � I 3 � s � � � � 1 � � es �D •- � ,j� .1 ��• ' t 1 1 I' J I 4 Y 1 e y i- 1�' •' 4OCK I • .•_.1 J d....,1..._1 ►..: •- 1_._1. _ � _ � _11. -� - L � i i c CL 1 I 1 1 ;/ -, 11 :( «� j; z / .c l 1 1, �2 �;�r 11J 1L1iJ LJ ;L L T 1 T � .0 % A. 95 .1. V &0 • • M - f; 4121 1� o 40 - =.1- 1 ` *V -7-4:4r — I --, -t e ti ft 1 15 .-17 G 1, 1 1 LL T 14 I -21 if LU c IZ z N. '`� ;' •�t� - -I r — ; -- -t- — T — ,! Z -`.fit — �• ,,,` '... � _ _..: I , T., `• . , ••,�. . Cdr 3� #�:07 7- V, PAO;.V.k --4 —C ' M 1 1 170 I 1 4 . l .L J..J !. .,i• � ��` r j f ev 0 :j -1- - ..1 0 IL 5 1 (� 6LOCKIPoo 3 • l+ , o o � � �, r y a T ., n 3 eA CC CO too I •• i 200 ~' �:..r► -«�.J� 1•:.•' ,� ?Mj.- 1 Too cc t i 1 j r-••T- �_.-_ !� :::_.. x .... 24 0 i 1 I . P 1 English Street Townhouses• . , 5/28/82 (PUD and PRELIMINAPY PLAT) 9 Attachment 3 4 N •fir � _ - _ C�iC PE AVENUE'��" . , CRVES COPE � i 33 33 i 1r I ! I J I� • ly 9.,j 1 s to Sv L7 � .. c CAVES ENGLISH STREET ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT 10 Attachment 4 i i� AD ST L PARK T R S M SEWER ".SE> AIS AVE. y i _ --- _ G R O Z _ -- --____ V I K IN ,,,..., C�" lw _ S AVE COP AVE. IT - �...� .� ....: ARK AVE. ....:...::.:. . ' �" ••.. :•:: :� :• : : :: 11••x: :• -' •• v App 1 i _ .::::...:•.: : �••::.•.•:: LAURIE RD • • •.:• : 1• :.: • 1 • :1:: • : •:•••: l .... •` ..7 ..•... c r - ^,=, � _ •• \•••', •••• C V' S A N D r tU R S. ^�" •ter. ^ -- r ^ -..-. � ... cc rl .. •._. .r r ... ._. 73 C-1 OLIC `' � .� .._.. F••- to --.. -- 0 1, .,:..... _. V C� ..._. `^ W Gj MID �N qr .� O - v RYAN _. AVE. Q. . f �Y r �� v 1 /' y .'• 1 � DRAINAGE AREA PROPOSED STORM SEWER (PROD. 79-8) FUTURE STORM SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER All, 1911, A& Aft illft Aft 111ft 11 Attachment 5 ' � S b(,1�110M y NO i mono $I SAM CAVE, PRESIDENT October 16, 1985 ED CAVE &SONS, INC CAVE GENERAL CONTRACTORS 2301 WOODBRIDGE ST. -SUITE 202 NEW HOMES R.OSEVILLE MINNESOTA 5e5113 LAND DEVELOPMENT ' RENOVATION COMMERCIAL 482 -9667 Randy Johnson City of Maplewood . Planning Department .1902 E. Co. Road B Maplewood, Mn 55109 Dear Mr. Johnson, The application for preliminary plat for Caves English Street Addition contains a request for approval of lots that are 60 feet wide. I understand that the usual width required. is 75 f eet minimum. I hope you will consider the request for the following reasons 1. The Comprehensive Plan for this land is RM. It is likely therefore that greater density could be approved than I am asking. In fact a townhouse project was once approved on this site. 2. The competition from other cities that allow 60 foot lots is very strong. 3. Sixty foot lots have been well accepted by the homebuyer. In fact the most popular types of homes right now have the garage in front of the house. This style fits easily . on 60 foot lots, 4. This. land is presently platted for 40 foot lots. Sin .e rely o rs , Ed ave & "Sons, Inc. 12 Attachment 6 1 ' A 5 sti es „Ter., Mo ED CAVE & SONS, INC. CAVE GENERAL CONTRACTORS ~+ 2301 WOODBRIDGE ST. SUITE 202 NEW HOMES ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 LAND DEVELOPMENT RENOVATION COMMERCIAL SAM CAVE, PRESIDENT 482 -9667 July 25, 1985 Mr.. Randy Johnson City of Maplewood, 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, Mn. 55109 Dear Randy, As you and I discussed last week, I went door to door to get the reaction of the neighbors to my proposal for 60 foot lots in English St. Addition in general and on English Street in particular. I did the canvassing this weekend and I am pleased to report that no one is opposed. Admittedly a few expressed reservations at this aspect of the project when I first mentioned it but all were willing to accept it as a part of the overall plan. After the explanation many expressed support. I am firmly convinced that there will be no substantial opposition to the plan as we have proposed it. I am enclosing my notes showing the names and addresses of the people I talked to. The map shows the locations of the properties that I visited. Several people were not on the list of property owners, I do not know the reasons, but request that you add them to the list of surrounding property owners to be notified. They are: Lester and Robin LaRouche, 1308 Cope Mrs. Lorge, 2252 English George Fischer, 2165 English Domingo and Trinidad Bernal, 2200 English Sinc 'rely Y rs , Sam el S. "Cave , President, Ed Cave & Sons, Inc. Enclosure: field notes with map 11 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of 1985 at 7 p.m. , The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Ed Cave and Sons, Inc. initiated a conditional use permit for a planned unit development of small -lot single dwelling g lots, including interior and corner lot - width variances, at the following described property: Lots 21 and 33 inclusive, Block 4, Sabin Addition to Gladstone and adjoining vacated alley and street rights -of -way, lying south of the following described l i n e : commencing at the Northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 4, thence south 28 deg. 35 min. west along the East line of said Lot 1 and its southerly extension 163 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence north 84 deg., 44 min. west 310.04 feet; thence north 89 deg. 52 min. west 225 feet to the .West line of Lot 14, Block 4, and there terminating and All of Block 5, and Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and Lot 27 all in Block 12, also all of Lots 10, 11, 12, 24, 25 and 26, except that part lying south of County Road , established by .the Board of County Commissioners of Ramsey County, Minnesota in 125 Misc. 448, Block 12, Sabin Addition to Ramsey County Minnesota, and the adjoining vacated streets and alleys WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows. 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by Ed Cave and Sons, Inc., pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on November 18, 1985. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 1985 Notice thereof was published and 'Mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. WHEREAS, the variances requested in conjunction with this planned unit development are: 14 Attachment 7 1. An interior lot width variance of 15 feet. Section 36 -88 (c) requires a minimum lot width for interior 7500 square foot lots f q o .75 feet. Sixty feet is proposed. 2. A corner lot width variance of 15 feet., Section 36 -88 c requires a minimum corner lot width for 7500 'square foot lots of 100 feet, Eighty -five feet is proposed, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described conditional use permit and variances be g ranted for Cave' s ' Engl ish Street planned unit development, subject to the following conditions: .1. Compliance with the preliminary plat dated November 7, 1985 as required to be amended by council, 2. The structure setbacks shall be as required in the R -2 double dwelling district. In addition, at least 15 feet of side yard area per lot shall be provided for all interior lots that have less than 75 feet of width. The structures on Lots 12 and 13 shall not encroach upon the 30 foot wide utility easement required alon g the common property line. 3 . Lots 2 and 18 shall be accessed only from McAfee Circle. Approval of the planned unit development is recommended on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan P P and with the purpose and standards of Chapter 36 -348 of city code. 2 The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 30 The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zonin g district. 4. There is no evidence that the use would depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, lare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes pollution, g p llution, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6 . The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties, 7 . The use would be serviced by essential. public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8* The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 15 90 The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects'. i . Approval of the lot width variances is recommended on the basis of the following findings of fact 1. Certain regulations contained in this chapter do not realistically apply to the proposed development because of the unique nature of the proposed development. 29 They would be consistent with the purposes of this chapter. i 3. The planned unit development would produce a development of equal or superior quality to that which would result from strict adherence to the provisions of this chapter. 40 The variances would not constitute a threat of a substantive nature of the property values, safety, health or general welfare of the owners or occupants of adjacent or nearby land, nor be detrimental to the health, safety, morals or general welfare of the people. 5. The variances are required for reasonable and practicable physical development and are not required solely on the basis of financial considerations. Adopted this day of , 1985. Seconded by Ayes- - .STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby. ,certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a ..regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of 1985, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a .full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permit. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1985. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 16 C Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council.. of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in'the council chambers in said city on the day of , 1985 . at 7 p.m. The following members were present: .The following' members were absent: ' WHEREAS, Ed Cave and Sons, Inc. initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following described rights -of -way located in the Sabin Addition, Ramsey County: 1. Laurie and Lark Avenues from the east right -of -way line of English Street to the west line of the Burlington Northern railroad right -of -way. . 2 . The alley rights -of -way in Block 5 and part of Block 12, lying north of County Road B. WHEREAS, the procedural history of these vacations is as follows: 1. A majority of the owners of property abutting said alley and street rights -of -way have signed a petition for these vacations; 2. These vacations were reviewed by the planning commission on .,November 18, 1985. The planning commission recommended to the city council that these vacations be 33 The city council held a public hearing on 1985 to consider these vacations. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above- described alley and street rights -of -way, public interest in the property will accrue to .the following described abutting properties all in the Sabin Addition, Ramsey County: Lots 18 through 33, Block 4 Lots 1 through 30, Block 5 Lots 1 through 11 and 26 through 27, Block 12 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood City Council that it is in the public interest to grant the above - described vacations on the basis of the following findings of fact: 116 The alley rights -of -way do not serve as a primary or secondary access to the adjoining property. 17 Attachment 8 20 The adjoining properties are undeveloped and ' under one ownership, with general site access from County Road B and English Street. , 3. Replatting of the site, with a different street configuration, is necessary to eliminate the present substandard -sized platted lots. These vacations are subject to the retention of a utility easement-over that portion of the north half of the Lark Avenue right- of-way that lies south and west of the following described -- line: beginning at the southwest corner of Lot 18, Block 4; thence to a point nine feet south of the Southeast corner of Lot 20, Block 4 along ...the southerly extension of the East line of said lot; thence south along said Southerly extension of the East line of Lot 20, Block 4 to a point on the South line of the North half of the Lark Avenue right- of -way and there terminating, all in the Sabin Addition, Section 10, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County. Adopted this day of , 1985 Seconded by Ayes- - STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS . CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of 1985 with the original on file in my office and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to vacation of the above described alley and street rights -of -way. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1985. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 1 �f V TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: - r Action by Council Endorse MEMORANDUM Modified Rej ected. City Manager Date Thomas Ekstrand-- Associate.Planner Plan Amendment (RM to LSC) and Zone Change (F and CO to LBC) McKnight Road South of Lower Afton Road Daybridge Learning Centers, Inc. Arnold E. Johnson Daybridge Learning Center November 25, 1985 SUMMARY Request 1. Approval of a land use plan amendment from RM residential al medium density to LSC, limited service commercial. 2. Approval of a rezoning from F, farm residential and CO commercial office to LBC, limited business commercial. Proposal Refer to the site plan and the applicant's letter on P g a e 4 The proposed zoning and land use classification would create an excel lent buffer between the existing single dwellings and the commercial zoning to the north, and would be compatible with the proposed day -care facility. Recommendation 10 Adoption of the resolution on page 10. approving a land use p lan amendment from RM, residential medium density to LSC, limited service commercial, on the basis that the LSC classification along with th the proposed day care use, would provide an excellent buffer between the existing single dwellings and the commercial property to the north. 2. Adoption of the resolution on page 11 approving a zone change p g e g from F, farm residential and CO, commercial office to LBC, limited business commercial, based on the findings required b the zoning g q Y g code BACKGROUND Site Description l Site size: 34,650 square feet. q , 2. Existing use: undeveloped. Surround Land Uses Northerly: undeveloped property planned LSC limited serv commercial and zoned CO, commercial office, Southerly: single dwellings. Easterly: undeveloped property planned RM residential ' Y P � dential medium density and zoned F, farm residential. Westerly: McKnight Road. Across McKnight Road are apartments P in St. Paul, Past Action 10- 10 -83: Council rezoned the property north of the ro osed site from P P F to CO and amended the land use plan from RM to LSC. DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Planning 1. Land use plan designation: existin - -RM• ro os -- g p p ed LSC . 2. The LSC classification refers to commercial facilities on a neighborhood scale. Heavy industrial uses department p stores, motels, auto accessory stores, etc. would be prohibited, while other land uses of a medium intensity nature would be permitted su.b ' J ect to .meeting certain performance standards. 30 Zoning: existing - -F and CO; ro osed - -LBC limited P P , business commercial. 4. Section 36 -154: The LBC classification allows ' offices, medical -clinics and day -care facilities. 5. Section 36 -485 of the zoning code states that specific ' p cif is findings . must be made to approve a zone change. Refer to f indings one through four in the resolution on page 11, g 2 JC Attachments 10 Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 30 Vista Hills Neighborhood Land Use Plan 40 Applicant's letter of explanation 5. Resolution- -plan amendment 6 Resolution zone change 70 Site plan ( separate attachment 3 rr� v! Q V f I; Y IL �- LOCATION MAP ° 4r Attachment 1 0 ONE- \� RES.ERVED s ' ----� Tp TA L FOR 4 .cm a ', LOWER AFTON ROAD �f .,• , 3G�.' E W-ER 4 ao it r 7• (' I lG.�45 ' Three feet of additional right—of—w _ z e• ¢j ��---- required by Ramsey County WOODF p v C 0 i24.87r� \ ` Proposed Split Lines �� LOW /0 6* Aa� pw ••••: •• : .......:....• \ ` .......:.....:... O ..:..:....................•... ............................ ........................... 328 338 `—�--- - ----- g 2 1 U D a 3 346 1 358 2271 �. 0 8s I Z4 i 0 !o G• -45 11wwn • r•rfa�i f • 4.0 ,� 1 , 1 •33&4. oil �(C ' 7.348 1��.41 420 , t M �� .c. 33 33 3 �. IV . 5 5 o�c. • 0 080 � ° "41 '�' 2 . 54 az . Co T r in I i � I \'D z �9 — ,n ' 4 3 ,4 N 29 _ � X40 442 - -, 6 fn 2i8 • _ 1 l i op d o A.GCa -c. a N 2 I < - -- e I PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 5 Attachment 2 N ; • cu L ` minor cotlec or AIN a I R , ' 1} "' " R h R l , uALAm"kii4m ass min c V Noma cu chi , • � .�;'� . • �) • ""m (� i �• { + I cc p 1•. r, O s • a.e I I � *minor coneetol �� w � .. ,V i f • W '� major collect , r .. ,WJ r Z rc W • L.. ci 0 Vista H a I I S NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN 6 • i Q r N Lm cc p an=% 99 ; • cu L ` minor cotlec or AIN a I R , ' 1} "' " R h R l , uALAm"kii4m ass min c V Noma cu chi , • � .�;'� . • �) • ""m (� i �• { + I cc p 1•. r, O s • a.e I I � *minor coneetol �� w � .. ,V i f • W '� major collect , r .. ,WJ r Z rc W • L.. ci 0 Vista H a I I S NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN 6 • i Q r N ATTACHMENT TO MAPLEWQQP REZONING APPLICATION DAYBRIDGE LEARNING.CENTERS, INC., It is the applicant's intention to construct a child care- - chi ld learning facility on the proposed 210 foot by .207 foot site as.described and illustrated in detail on the site plan and building floor and exterior building elevation detail sheets accompanying applicant's coincident applications to the Community Design Board, The North 86.8 feet of the proposed site is presently zoned "CO" and the South 120.2 feet is now zoned "F", neither of which is, compatible with the intended use nor compatible with each j other. The present land use classification in the Comprehensive Plan of the "F" zoned portion is "Rm ". Because of the small size of - this piece and the fact that it borders single family dwellings to the south and commercial offices to the north, it seems unlikely that it will be attractive as a site for a single, stand -alone duplex or 4 -plex which is what the current land use classification.seems to call for, but in the event it is developed for medium density residential use, such use would be a less suitable buffer between the existing single family residence and the commercial development than a 5 -day week, daytime only, child care facility. The child care facility proposed, with its residential type building construction and relatively large, open, landscaped area, would be a very acceptable buffer between the residential and commercial developments. Daybridge Centers do not operate at night or on weekends and therefore would create an especially desirable buffer from the commercial development. from both the visual and noise aspects. The parking and playground areas for the proposed child care center will both be located on the north side of the building as remote as the site will allow from the existing residence on the south side. All of the roof - mounted mechanical equipment will be located on the north side of the gabled roof, completely screened from the residence by the roof itself and in turn screened from the property to the north and from McKnight Road by the balcony screen, thus presenting a residential -like architecture when viewing the facility and the adjacent residences at the same time, Access to the site will be from McKnight Road, constructed and classified as a "minor arterial" street. The site is less than 300 feet from the intersection with Lower Afton Road where both streets are classified as "major arterial" roads, so access roads exist to adequately handle any additional neighborhood traffic generated by the proposed child care facility with no new construction needed. Sanitary sewer, storm sewer and 7 Attachment 4 watermains exist along McKnight Road proposed development so'no extension required, immediately in front of the of utilities will be .Daybridge Learning Centers, Inc. proposes to construct and operate, on the subject property, a.Child Learning Center staffed and constructed to meet all of the requirements of the City; County and State as a licensed child care and learning center for 140 participants. Daybridge currently owns and operates eight similar licensed facilities in the Twin Cities area in the municipalities of Eagan, Apple Valley, Burnsville, Bloomington, Maple Grove and Brooklyn Park, and construction is nearing 'completion on its newest center in Eden Prairie. In addition, centers in Minnetonka, Plymouth and White Bear Lake have received City approval. The structure will be a new building in what we believe to be an attractive architectural design with a traditional roof style which will blend harmoniously with a.suburban environment. The entire site will be landscaped and maintained'by an underground irrigation system. Exterior lighting is used to illuminate the entrances to the building only. No exterior floodlighting will be constructed that could be detrimental to night motorists or neighbors. The identification sign is proposed with interior lighting so that no light source will be visible. For the safety of the participants and firemen, the building will be sprinklered including not only the occupied areas, but concealed attic spaces as well where flammable building materials exist. Smoke and heat detectors will be installed in all classrooms and an integral alarm system will be connected to a U.L, approved central alarm station. The automatic f ire extinguishing system will include a siamese pumper connection on the building exterior for fire department use. Unobstructed access will be provided to the front of the building and the siamese connection. The children's playground area will be entirely fenced so no child can be endangered by vehicle traffic on adjacent streets. A one -way drop off lane is provided at the front entrance for the protection of children and drivers when loading and unloading passengers. Vehicle access to the property will be off of McKnight Road and all parking requirements will be met on the site with no street parking required. The nature of the business precludes its placing any unusual demands on the municipal utilities such as water, sanitary sewer or • storm sewers. The facility will, through its professional staff of teachers and administrators, enhance childrens mental, physical and emotional growth and adjustment at a critical period in their lives during those times when they are separated from parents, a useful, valuable and needed service for working parents. The facility will enhance the health, safety, , morals and comfort of its participants, improve property values in its. vicinity and contribute to the orderly development'of the surrounding property. Daybridge Learning Centers, Inc. by Schoell & Madson, Inc. ck T. Vosler 9 PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Daybridge Learning Centers, Inc. initiated an amendment 'to the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan from RM, residential me ium density to LSC, limited service commercial for the f-ol lowing described property: A 21O. foot by. 165 foot track of land on the east side. of .McKnight Road, approximately half way between lower Afton Road and Lond i n Lane, WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing December 2, 1985 to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said plan amendment be . 24, The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on , 19 8 5. The council considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described plan amendment be approved on the basis that the LSC classification, along with the proposed day care use, would provide an excellent buffer between the existing single dwellings and the commercial property to the north. Adopted this day of , 1985. Seconded by Ayes -- 10 Attachment 5 f Pursuant to* due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the._ City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and .held in the council chambers in. said city' on the day of 1985 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: J The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Daybridge Learning Centers, Inc.. initiated a rezoning from F, farm residential to LBC, limited business commercial for the following- described property: The North 207.00. feet of the South 657.00 feet of the East 210.00 feet of the West 250.00 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 12, Township 28 North, Range 22 West of the 4th Principal Meridian. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by Daybridge learnin g Centers Inc. , pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning g Commission on December 2, 1985. The planning commission recommended to ' the city council that said rezoning be 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 1985 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and .Mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose an-1 intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare, 11 Attachment 6 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection .a.nd schools. 5o The .proposed change will create an' excellent- buffer between the existing single dwellings and the commercial land to' the north. Adopted this day of , 19850 Seconded by Ayes ww- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of , 1985 with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true , and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this rezoning. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1985. City Clerk City of Maplewood. 12 December 4, 1985 MEMORANDUM Action by Coulzeil: Endorse To: Acting City Manager Kenneth Haid Modified. ,�,,.. From: Chief of Police Kenneth Col 1 i ns G�c'*10 Rejected. Subject: Bids for Pol Vehicles Date �. On December 3, 1985, at 2:00 p.m., bids were opened at the Maplewood Police Department for four used police vehicles that were advertised in the Dispatch - Pioneer Press on Sunday, November 24, 1985. The following is a list of the vehicles and the high bid on each: U n i t 419 1981 Ford LTD $ 211.00 Unit 422 1982 Ford LTD 400.00 Unit 423 1983 Dodge Diplomat 1,751.65 Unit 448 1977 Dodge Maxi —Van 502.00 It is my recommendation that the three high bids under $1,000 be accepted and the vehicles awarded to the high bidders. I would further recommend that the bid on Unit 423 for $1,751.65 be sent to the City Council with a recommendation that it be accepted. I submit this for your approval and handling. KVC: i s cc Lieutenant Nelson Vehicle File Acti by C MEMORANDUM Endorsed � TO: City Manager Rejecte FROM: Associate Planner --Johnson Dat .SUBJ ECT: Code Amendment--CNG and LPG Faciliti .DATE: November 13, 1985 SUMMARY Request 10 Amend the BC, business commercial code to allow CNG (compressed natural gas) and LPG (liquid petroleum gas) dispensing facilities as a permitted use, 20. Amend the code to require annual licensing of CNG and LPG facilities. 3. Establish a licensing fee. When properly installed, operated and maintained, CNG and LPG dispensing facilities are compatible with -- locations associated with service stations, sporting goods stores, warehouses and industrial uses. These facilities are less obtrusive and safer than gas stations. Since gas stations are permitted uses in BC, business commercial districts, these facilities should also be allowed as permitted uses in. the BC districts. If the code is amended as proposed, only one facility- -Twin City would � Vending-- d become a nonconforming use. This means that council approval would be required if the facility were to be expanded, However, the nonconforming use status could be eliminated if the land use plan for this area were to be amended to BW business warehousing, The BW classification would be more appropr i a - te than the present designation of LSC, limited service commercial. Council recently tabled action on a plan amendment to BW for this area, According to the fire marshal, CNG and LPG dispensin g facilities can be hazardous if not properly installed, operated and maintained. Annual inspection and licensing are necessary o ensure compliance Y P with all safety requirements. Recommendatio 1. Approve the enclosed ordinance (page 7 ) , to (at least four votes are required for . approval) : a. Classify CNG and LPG dispensing facilities as a permitted use in the BC zoning district. b. Require annual inspection and licensing of these facilities. 20 Approve the enclosed 'resolution (page 9) to set an annual initial license fee, based upon the Uniform Building Code fee schedule, and an annual license renewal fee of .$15 per dispenser, for CNG and LPG dispensing facilities. - .r. BACKGROUND Fire Marshal LPG and CNG are highly flammable, but are compatible with locations in business and industrial areas if all safety requirements are' complied with. LPG and CNG facilities need no more regulation than gas stations. There. is a public need to annually inspect the facilities and the qualifications of the operator (s) where CNG or LPG is transferred to motor vehicles or to end -use containers . Gas stations are similarly regulated. Among the guidelines set forth by the National Association (NFPA) , the area immediately under storage tank must be kept uncluttered and free The tank also must be kept painted and clean t corrosion will not deteriorate the pressurized of operators should also be checked. Fire Protection and adjacent to the of flammable materials, o ensure that rust or tank. Proper training Periodic inspection of these safety - related items is the responsi- bility of the local fire marshal. According to an official from the state fire marshal's office, they do not get involved, except if requested by a local official, after the installation of facilities with 2000 gallons or less of capacity. An official from the state office in charge of weights and measures stated that their only responsibility was to make sure that the metering devices accurately register the amount of gas dispensed. There is no need to require annual inspections and licensing of facilities used solely to produce light and power for nonveh i c le uses, such as those operated by NSP on Century Avenue and'by 3M. These facilities and their operators are strictly regulated by the companies. The Uniform Fire Code provides adequate regulatory authority for these f a c i l i t i e s , Planning 10. If this proposal facility at Twin City Section 36 -17 of city of a building or land of the zoning code to would require city ap; is approved, the operation of the LPG dispensing Vending would be subject to the requirements of code which conditionally permits any lawful use existing at the effective date of any provision continue as a nonconforming use. Any expansion proval. 2. If these facilities are designated as permitted uses in the BC district, they would be regulated as follows in the M -1, light manufacturing district: a. Section 36 -186 (a) of the M -1, code classifies as permitted uses: permitted use in a BC, business and property is not designated for LSC, or RM, residential medium density u plan." light manufacturing district "Any use listed as a commercial district, if the limited service commercial, se on the city's comprehensive 3 b. Section 36 -187 (a) (3) of the M -1 district code ' requires a condi tional use permit for any use listed as a permit ted use in a BC, business commercial district, if- the property is- designated for LSC, limited service commercial orRM, residential medium density use on the city's comprehensive P lans" Existing Facilities LPG dispensers used to transfer this fuel to motor vehicles and to fuel containers for end -use are located at: 1. Larry's Live Bait and Sporting oods g 2626 White Bear Avenue 20 Sunrise Standard White Bear Avenue and County Road D 3 0 Mike's LP Gas Service Center Frost Avenue and Clarence Street 49 Twin.City Vending 1065 Highway 36 5e Hej ny' s Rental 1829 White Bear Avenue Sunrise Standard, Mike's LP and Larry's ' y s Bait are zoned for BC use and would become permitted uses under this proposals Hejny P � y Rental i s located in an R -1, single dwelling district under a conditional tional use permit (CUP) to operate a rental equipment b • usiness. The principal use of the dispensing facility at Hejny Rental is to fuel ortable heaters that are rented b . con p • y tractors for winter construction. This use is consistent with the CUP for the business, The facility at Twin City Vending, although zoned - g g e for M 1 use would become a nonconforming use because the site is lanned for LSC P , limited service commercial use. (See the comment and lannin g sections.) P City Clerk There is no provision in code to require licensing ng of CNG or LPG dispensing facilities, other than if operated ted b a as p y g station, Sunrise Standard, at . White Bear Avenue and Count Road oad D, has a motor fuel permit that includes their LPG dispenser, Comments from the Owners of Existing Facilities A draft copy of the proposed code was sent to the owners of each existing facility within the city. Twin City Vending did not oppose the code, provided the would be permitted Y p mitted to continue to use their facility. Mike's LP Gas suggested a couple of minor revisions that were acceptable. Hejny Rental questioned whether the proposed annual 4 inspections would duplicate inspections already being made by the state and gas suppliers and whether. an annual inspection would be effective for making sure that the operators are properly ro erl trained. P Y Larry's Live Bait felt that their facility ,is adequately regulated without the proposed code, ' Survey of Other Communities Licensing /Permit Required and Fee Community Initial Installation Annual Renewal White Bear Lake Yes, UBC guidelines ( one No facility) North St. Paul Fire marshal approval - -no fee No (one facility) Oakdale Yes, conditional use permit -- Yes--$50 $50 Woodbury Fire marshal approval - -no fee No (two facilities) Newport ti' Yes, $15 fire inspection permit No (temporary or permanent) (two facilities) Roseville Yes, UBC guidelines Yes--$1 (several facilities) .(proposing $15) Little Canada Yes, UBC guidelines No (two facilities) Vadnais Heights Yes, UBC guidelines, lus Yes 3� to city P , $ y a $10 fire marshal permit $10 to f ire marshal (two facilities) St. Paul (Not able to obtain informa- tion) Bloomington Yes, $25 per dispenser Yes, $25 per P ( several facilities) d i spenser Minnetonka Yes, UBC guidelines No ( several f a c i l i t i e s ) Gas Supplier Comments The district manager for Texgas supports the proposal for annual city inspections of these f a c i l i t i e s , According to this per son , Texgas is one of the largest, if not the largest, suppliers of LP gas in this area. Their company has a policy of making quarterly inspections of the facilities, including operator training records, for which they supply this fuel. His concern is that some of their competitors may 5 not be as conscientious He stated that the typical cost for a 1000 =to 1500 gallon. tank -is about $4500. Using the UBC guidelines, the license fee would be , about $50 He did not think this was unreasonable. r w• Procedure 1. Planning commission recommendation 20 City council: l st reading 2nd reading and final decision jw Attachments 19 ordinance amendment (zoning and licensing requirement) g q ) 20. Resolution (licensing fee) �v ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE.RELATING TO ZONING AND*LICENSING REQUIREMENTS FOR CN AND LP-GAS DISPENSING FACILITIES Section 1. Sec. 36 -153 (1) (j) and (k) of the BC, business commercial district are hereby amended as f of lows ( language to be deleted is crossed out and language to be added is underlined) : Sec, 36-153 (1) of the BC, business commercial code: ( Z) CNG ( compressed natural gas) and LPG ( liquid petroleum gas) dispensing facilities, except those whose primary purpose is to produce power and light for nonvehicle uses, such as at 3M, NSP' s facility on Century Avenue and for temporary P Y use in construction sites. Tanks shall not exceed a water capacity of 1500 gallons. The licensing requirements in Chapter 17.3 shall be complied with. (j) ( Any use of the same general character as any of the above uses, provided that no use which is noxious or hazardous shall be permitted. Section 2. City code is hereby amended to add the following chapter: g p Chapter 17.3 CNG AND LPG DISPENSING FACILITIES Sec. 17.3 -1. License requ i red . Except as stated in Section 17.3 -2, a license shall be required to engage in the business of the dispensing of CNG (compressed natural gas) or LPG (liquid petroleum gas) to motor vehicles or to fuel containers for end use. All such facilities that were in existence prior to this requirement, shall obtain a license within three months of the date this ordinance becomes effective. A license sha l l not be issued until all zoning and site design requirements are satisfied and the fire marshal grants approval, based upon compliance with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Pamphlet 58. Sec. 17.3 -2. License exempted. LNG (liquid natural gas), CNG or LPG facilities used solely to produce light or power for nonvehicle uses, such as at 3M, NSP's facility on Century Avenue and temporary use on construction sites, shall be .exempted from l i c e n s i n g , CNG and LPG dispensing f ac i l i t i es that are "licensed under a motor fuel station permit shall be exempted from licensing under Section 17.3 -1. Sec, 17.3 -3. License duration. All licenses issued under this chapter shall be subject to annual renewal. Renewal shall be subject to compliance with NFPA Pamphlet 58 Attachment 1 requirements and. any other requirements imposed as a condition of previous approval (s Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon. its P g ' ass,a a and publication. Passed by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this day of , 1985. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Ayes-- Nays-- - RESOLUTION N0. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city-on the day f 7 p.m. 1985 at Y , The following members were present: The following members were absent: Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: WHEREAS, an amendment to the Code of Ordinances has been proposed P to require annual licensing of CNG (compressed natural gas) and LPG (liquid petroleum gas) dispensing facilities; WHEREAS, Section 17 -2 of the Code of Ordinances erm i is the City P Council to establish license fees by resolution; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY.THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that: The initial licensing fee for CNG (compressed natural as g ) and LPG (liquid petroleum gas) dispensing facilities, licensed under Chapter 17.3 of the Code of Ordinances shall be based upon the fee schedule in the Uniform Building Code. The annual license renewa 1 fee for LPG or CNG dispensing ' f a c i l i t i e s , licensed under Chapter 17.3 of City Code, shall be $15 P er dispenser. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution shall become effective upon the adoption and publication of Chapter 1 of p 7 3 the Code of Ordinances, Adopted this day of , 19 8 5 . Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have j i c- arefully compared the* attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the- C'.ity of Maplewood, held on the day f 1985 with the original, inal Y r g on file in my office, and the same is .a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to the establishment of this annual licensing fee. Witness, my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of. the city ,.this day of • , 19850. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 10 1:0n i4. .Action by Council: End orsed,— MEMORANDUM Modified. ReJ eoted.�.,,, TO: City Manager Date �.. FROM: Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Cope Avenue -- English Street -- County Road B Storm Sewer DATE November 26, 19 8 5 The developer of Cave's English Street Addition has proposed improvements to his property on the east side of English Street at County Road B. These improvements call for on -site storm water storage with discharge to the Cope Avenue system to serve the northern portion of the development. The southern portion of the property cannot be recommended for development until a storm sewer system is constructed to serve the area. The Maplewood Drainage Plan and two previous studies of this area recommend a trunk storm sewer from Highway 36 east of English Street southerly along the Burlington Northern Railroad to County Road B then along County Road B to Birmingham Street and eventually to Hazelwood Street. The area proposed to be served by this trunk sewer is roughly English Street on the west, the Soo Line Railroad on the South, Prosperity Road on the east and Cope Avenue on the north. It is recommended that the council authorize the preparation /updating of the feasibility study for this improvement, RESOLUTION--CALLING FOR PRELIMINARY PLANS WHEREAS, The cit council has proposed that the area described as: Cope Avenue and En Street south to Count Road B and Birmin Street and north to Gerten Pond be improved b construction of a trunk storm sewer s NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the proposed improvement be referred to the cit en who is hereb instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advisin the Council in a preliminar wa as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and should best be made as proposed, and the estimated cost of the_ improvement as recommended,