Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1985 11-25 City Council Packet
f.' 1 4t . 1 . I 1 . . . . I . .. I I , . I. . I I . . .1 . 1. I I .. .. I I I . ' . . " I I ,. .. - I I I.. . - 1. - . .. AMENDED. AGENDA I 1, I I 1. I... . I : 1. .1 _'..I . I - 1, I " I I AGENDAI . r . ,::_",-,-_._ . I , . I I . . . . I I . . I . , I I 1. I . . I I .11 I I I I . a .. . I 1. . . , 1. - I . ;;.Ma lewo do_ C t Counc .P yI I I 11 - . I I 1. I.: . 1 7 O 0 ..-. ,.% -- .. 1- .1 I : : . I.: I 1. -1. .. " I , .,0 P. M. Mond a. November . '2I-- - , I .. 1.11 " . I . . I -- -Y,. I . - - , 5, 1985 1. 11 . - 1:-_ Munic a1: Adm nla'.tra .on I . . . . I I . Ip , Bu1 .i . 1 11 :. _ ' . - I 11 I I .1. 1.', ..'' I --' I I .I I I I . . . . I . I I I 1 . I 11 I . : , M _ eets ng. 85-2.5 - . 11 ,. . I I I - I I.. .. . I ;, I. I . I I., ( A). , I I j . '... . .. , , ICALLTOORDER _ . I . „ _-... . I I . , j ,.: . 11 I I .. . I .11- - . I - I I I . I I'll I . . I . -. I . . : _. I I L . . . I -. I { .) . L L .GAL L - .., 1.11 . I I I I B L I 1. . I I I I I I L L W1.1 L . {:) 1. I - L L I I ... I 1: ;, -L . P _-A P f Q F M I N UTE , ; - 1, L.I . I III . I . . 1. 1. L 11 I . I I I I I I L I I I 1. I . D I II I I I I .1 I ..., - 1 I I I . "I .. .. I I.. . . .i 1 . 1; - 1 , 1. I -1. L . ; I I . . I I 11 I 111. !_ .1 L - . I I . I . I., -1. -1 I -: , i. I . -1. . L I L I I.L I - %- . I -. I , IL .. :" .. . I I I.. L . IL I . 11 L L . . I . . - _,.., :L j , . I '. . ; I '' 11 .. I - I . I ;. . . . I I . . . I , . _ 1 ILI APPROVAL OF ` AGENDA -. L I 1. I 1. I . . I L 1. L . I L . .. I I L.. I I 11.)''.Ll. 11''.1-11 I.. I - I.''..'' ,.. .. ' . - I I I . . L I I . 11 - I . I . I : I c ). I . I L L I - I . I I . .1 L. I I I .1 I ., 1: I L - I t. L L .L". . L I 1. . . _ - I . . .. I . .11 I I 11 . .1 . 1. . .. . I L I., L I , I L I .CONSE G I I 1. : , . I . I I . I . I IL , I , IL I I I I I ... "I L. . . - % . -, r I-,A , ENDA I .1. I . 1.1-11 - 1-:1 I I L I . I IL .11 . L . I 1 I. I . I . . . . .... . I . I .. L L . 1 .1 . . LL. 1 . , -1 - . 1. I 11 I - 1 a ; : L. I I 11 1. I L. L , L I I 11 . I L- '' . . Adcountls P.a able - I . .. I .1 . I .. y I L I .; -,- , 11 I L . - I I I . LL .. . L . . 1 . - . I 2, . P : : .1 11 j. 'Lroet8 , . L I ." ,, L I L . c 5.4 Reduct on of Reta1 n e9I .1-. I , . I .., . I I IL I . I L. I . % . . 1 . . - L J 9 .. 9 I.''. 1 I.. .. ..-.. I . L IL3. , :+ Pro ect 85 -9 Chan a Order- 1. . 11I .. . L. I L I . . I I I I L L. I I I L . 11.1 L . .,:.ILII I L .. L. I •, 111.1 ,. - - '-: I . I'll I . . . I I4 . , -: . A r 1 LIL PP ova _ f On &Off Sal a .. L . uor L1 ce se . . L . g IL: , L I I I F . L I I . . I I I , I. 1.,. - I I 1. .PUBLI C HEARINGS I . . I 111 I I L . . , L . I I . . I .1 I L . I I L I I . I -I I L . I . I I . I L I L 1. . ' I. 7 O It; . I RB . Ed 1 na ReaIty '-'. . I . L I L I I I . I I 1 . 1 . I I L ., . ,. _L . I . . 1. I IL 1.11, . L _LL I . I I L.. 1. ,. . . . : - L L .., - -_ - - I . . . I II I I I . L I I I 11 I I L. 11 L.I . I . IR - ' B C & White Bear,Ave. Assoc I .I .- L : I -111. L .. I I.... L. .11 . - 1. -L I I,- ", L . I L -.1.1 . . I-L, I4 " I I I I . . I I I . 1. , . i ,1. 1. .1 L11 . . I 1 I I . .11 IL I ...,., I I-, I . I . _ -. i ' I L I L - . . .. . I L3. I . 1 1 . 7.30 - varl ance . 262.3 th . to Bear. Ave... , Kenneth s , , - . 11 . I I L L. 11 . I L I . I . I I .. . 1 - L .. . I I I I L _.. I . . A . 7.40 Tax Exempt Financing . Harmon. ` Sdhool Site1L11.11, I 11, I y I I .. . I I I I . I { G) I IL I 1, IL . 1. . L. - . I . I. AWARD O F B L DS . .1. L . I . L - I I . I . I I 1: .. ILI I . 1. . I I I .11 .I , I I L _, I I I I L . 1.11 I'll L. . L . .. I I . I . . L . L IL ..1. I L 1. 1. .. . - I L I I .11 . . I . I I I.. L1Trucks I I I I . . .. . . I - {H 1. I L L - I I . . . 11 . UNFINISHED BUSINES'S L . L - . 1. I I L.. L . . . . . I 11 I I . L - . ILL I I L ''I I I . I { } I . I . I . . . I I I : :',,B NESS .i . 1 . L. .1 I . I.. .. I NEW USI . . . I . L . I 1., lo I L I ..., 1. I-, ., I I . 1. 1. L I .I I . I I I I . 1.1-1 I I 1'. Sign Permit: 3435 Whi Bear Ave. {The Tan Line }. L I L I L :. , : _', I . L I . 1-1 I I I L i I I I L 1.i: I L I I I L . . I . I I .L L : 2. Home Share Pilot Program . I - 11 I - L 11 . I I - . L . I L 11", . I . I . _. I I I .11 L I F . % I I L . L L . . . I . . I . I L . L .3 Code Amendment: Small Lot` Single Dwellings fist Reading) LL . I . . I I I ... 1. ,. I L . . 1 I I L I . ..1. L L I I I , I . . . L L- I 4 March of D1 mes Su er 400' Snowmobi l a Marathon 1 I LI _ P I . I I L I . L . . . I . L. . I .L . : L . . L . I . I I , _ . . 5 Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed D stri ct Nomi nat on ... I . . 1, '. - 1 . I L I I I I I . I '' I I I L - . I I .1 61 . At`torney Fee Structure . . 1L..I I I L . . 1. 1 I I . I - . I . I . L . II II I . .LL 7 . December : 23 , 1985 _ Council Meeting I I I I I I L . I I I I L . . I .1 . 1. O city Manage Sel criteria ; . I I . . 1 . .. I . I I L. I I I L I . . I . 1 I .11 . I I 1: .. I . 1 - I I ti MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, October 28, 1985 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 85-23 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present MaryLee Maida, Councilmember Present Charlotte Wasiluk, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Meeting 85 -21 (October 9, 1985) Councilmember Anderson moved that the Minutes of Meeting No. 85 -21 (October 9, 1985) be aMproved as submitted Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 2. Meeting No. 85 -22 (October 18, 1985) V Councilmember Maida moved that the Minutes of Meeting No. 85 -22 (October 18, 1985 ) be approved as submitted Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended 1. Archer Heights 2. Citizens' Concerns 3. Frost Avenue Storm Sewer 4. Don John Property 5. Phalen Place Lights 6. St. Johns 7. Certification of Sewer Utility Accounts 8. I.R.B.'s Edina Realty & C and White Bear Associates 9. Personnel Matter Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. Ayes - all. 10/28 I 4t E. CONSENT AGENDA Council removed Items 2, 4 and 5 from the Consent Agenda, not for discussion _purposes, but for separate voting. Councilmember Bastian moved, Seconded by Councilmember Maida, Ayes - all, to approve Items 1, 3 6, 7, $ and 9 of the Consent Agenda as recommended 1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part I, Fees, Services, Expenses Check Register dated October 17, 1985, through October 21, 1985 - $451,390.45 Part II, Payroll dated October 18, 1985, gross amount $121,192.79) in the amount of $572,583.24. 3. Certification of Election Judges Resolution No. 85 - 10 - 158 RESOLVED, that the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, accepts the following list of Election Judges for the 1985 General Election, Tuesday, November 5, 1985: Precinct No. 1 Eleanor Mathews, Chairman Lorraine Schneider Agnes Allen Idamae Biebighauser Precinct No. 6 Kathy Supan , Chairman Gunborg Mowchan Linda Prigge Judy Widholm Precinct No. 2 Pat Thompson, Chairman Kathleen Dittel Bea Hendricks Florence Stella Precinct No. 3 Charlene Arbuckle, Chairman Barb Leiter Doris Broady Alice Miller Precinct No. 4 Jack Arbuckle, Chairman Caroline Warner Joyce Lipinski Marjory Tooley Precinct No. 5 Elsie Wiegert, Chairman Emma Klebe Sibbie Sandquist Phyllis Erickson Precinct No. 7 Myrtle Malm, Chairman Betty Haas Armella Podgorski Joan Cottrell Precinct No. 8 Lorraine Fischer, Chairman Betty Berglund Rita Frederickson Paul Arbuckle Precinct No. 9 Mary Johnson, Chairman Delores Mallet Margaret McDonald Theodore Haas Precinct No. 10 Anne Fosburgh, Chairman Mary Lou Lieder Dorothy Arbore Pat Werden 2 - 10/28 Precinct No. 11 Delores Lofgren, Chairman Maxine Olson Shirley Luttrell 6. Budget Transfer Precinct No. 12 Mary Libhardt, Chairman Deloris Fastner Mildred Dehen Orpha Getty Approved the budget transfer of $14,000.00 from the General Fund Contingency Account the Street Maintenance materials account to provide for the purchase of 12 00•tons of sand and salt mixture. 7. City Hall Plans Resolution No. 85 - 10 - 159 WHEREAS, plans for a new City Hall building have been approved with a sanitary sewer connection to a North St. Paul interceptor sewer, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNE- SOTA: That the proposed sanitary sewer connection is hereby approved and is consistent with the approved sewer plan. 8. Time Extension : Schwichtenberg's Second Addition Approved a one -year time extension for the Schwichtenberg's 2nd Addition preliminary plat for thirteen single - dwelling lots, three outlots and a large remnant lot to be developed as a second phase. 9. Final Plat : Crestview Forest Third Addition Approved the final plat of Phase Three of the Crestview Forest Town House planned unit development known as the Crestview Forest Third Addition final plat. 4. Non -Union Salaries Councilmember Bastian moved the 1986 non -union salaries be established as 4 1/2 per cent increase plus $50.00 per month City contribution would be made to the deferred cop ensation pro2ram for each full -time employee as presented Seconded by Councilmember Anderson.Ayes - all. 5. Travel and Training Policy Councilmember Bastian moved to approve the following amendment to the Travel and Training policies For out -of- -state training approved by the City Manager, the City will pay for the conference fee, two- thirds of the transportation cost and up to $50.00 per day for meals and lodging. Seconded by Councilmember Maida.Ayes - all. 3 - 10/28 2. Designation of Depository Councilmember Maida introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85- 10- 160 BE IT RESOLVED, that Investors Savings Bank be and hereby is selected as a depository for time deposits of the City of Maplewood, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the deposits in the above depository shall not exceed the amount of F.S.L.I.C. insurance covering such deposits unless collateral or a bond is furnished as additional security, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that funds in the above depository may be with- drawn and wire transferred to any other official depository of the City by the request of the City Treasurer or Finance Director, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this depository designation is effective indefinitely. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson and Maida Nays - Councilmembers Bastian and Wasiluk. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 10 7:00 P.M., Rezonings. : Kohlman Avenue, East of T.H. 61 a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposed rezoning of the area of Kohlman Avenue and T.H. 61 as follows: Rezone eight single dwelling properties from M -1 Light manufacturing to R-1 single dwelling and rezone the southeasterly part of the north 200 feet of 1293 Kohlman Avenue from R -1 to M -1. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the Staff report. c. Commissioner Ralph Sletten presented the Planning Commission recommendation. d. Mr. Jonathon Buesing, one of the owners of the property involved, stated he supported the Planning Commission's recommendation. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 4 - 10/28 85 - 10 - 161 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from R -1, residence district (single dwelling) to M -1, light manufacturing for the following - described property: That part of Lot 12, Kohlman's Lakeview Addition, lying east of a line beginning at the Northeast corner and ending at a point on the West line thereof, 200 feet south of the Northwest corner This property is also known as 1293 Kohlman Avenue, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on September 16, 1985. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on October 28, 1985, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. Use of this area will require combination with the M -1 property to the north or east. 2. Poor soils and the inability to provide access from the east, preclude the use of this area for residential purposes. 3. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 4. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 5. The proposed change will.serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 6. The proposed change would have no.negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. am 5 - 10/28 i. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85 - 10 - 162 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from M -1, light manufacturing to R -1, residence district (single dwelling) for the following - described properties: The following lots or portions of the following described lots lying westerly of a line beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 12, and ending at the Southwest corner of Lot 5, Kohlman's Lakeview Addition: 1. Lots 4 through 9, Lots 13 through 17, except the North 200 feet and the.South half of Lot 18, Kohlman's Lakeview Addition 2. Subject to County Road C, the East 66 feet of the South 383.3 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22; 3. Beginning at a point 531.75 feet west and 378.4 feet south of the Northeast corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4, thence south 215.7 feet to the Northeasterly line of Kohlman Avenue, thence north 50 degrees 36 minutes west on said Northeasterly line 108 feet, thence north 67 degrees 12 minutes west on said Northeasterly line 70 feet, thence north 22 degrees, 48 minutes east 100 feet, thence north 76 degrees, 40 minutes east 116.3 feet to the point of beginning in the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 4, Town- ship 29, Range 22. These properties are also known as 1247, 1257, 1263, 1281, 1287, 1244, 1250 and 1264 Kohlman Avenue and 1237, 1243, 1251 and 1255 County Road C, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on September 16, 1985. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on October 28, 1985, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. All of the properties are developed with single dwellings consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 6 - 10/28 2. Rezoning is needed to eliminate the undesirable possibility of commercial uses being started among single dwellings. 3. The neighborhood character would be strengthened by an R -1 zone. 4. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 5. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safe- guarded. 6. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 7. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facili- ties, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 2. 7:10 P.M., Tax Increment Financing a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposal to develop a tax - increment financing plan and development program. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the Staff report. C. Commissioner Ralph Sletten presented the Planning Commission recommenda- tion. d. Mary Ippel, Briggs and Morgan, City Bond Consultant, explained the specifics of tax increment financing programs. e. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following expressed their views: Marilyn Vors, School District 622 Board member Dave Selgren, representing Robert Hajicek Ken Gervais, Castle Design and Development George Rossbach , 1406 E. County Road C f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85 - 10 - 163 am 7 - 10/28 RESOLUTION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM RELATING THERETO, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 -1, HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1-1 AND HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -2 AND THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN RELATING THERETO WHEREAS: A. It has been proposed that the City of Maplewood create Development District No. 1 and adopt a development program with respect thereto and create Economic Development District No. 1-1, Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 (collectively the "Tax Increment Districts ") within Develop- ment District No. 1 and adopt a tax increment financing plan with respect thereto and under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.71 to 273.78 and Chapter 472A (collectively the "Act ") ; B. The Council has investigated the facts and has caused to be prepared a development program and tax increment financing plan for Development District No. 1, and has caused to be prepared a proposed tax increment financing plan for the Tax Increment Districts. C. The City has performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the creation of Development District No. 1 and the Tax Increment Districts and the adoption of the proposed development program and tax incre- ment financing plan relating thereto, including, but not limited to, notifi- cation of Ramsey County and Independent School District No. 622 and Special Intermediate School District No. 916 having taxing jurisdiction over the property to be included in the Tax Increment Districts, a review by the City Planning Commission of the proposed Development Program for Development District No. 1, and the holding of a public hearing upon published and mailed notice as required by law. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Maple- wood as follows: 1. Development District No. 1. There is hereby established in the City of Maplewood Development District No. 1, the initial boundaries of which are fixed and determined as shown on the attached Exhibit A. 2. Development Pro ram. The development program for Development District No. 1, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Manager, is adopted as the Development Program for Development District No. 1. 3. Tax Increment Districts a) There is established in the City of Maplewood within Development District No. 1 a tax increment financing district to be known as "Economic Development District No. 1 -1, "the initial boundaries of which are fixed and determined as shown on the attached Exhibit B incorporated herein by refer- ence. 8 - 10/28 b) There is established in the City of Maplewood within Development District No. 1 a tax increment financing district to be known as Housing Dis- trict No. 1 -1 the initial boundaries of which are fixed and determined as shown on the attached Exhibit C incorporated herein by reference. c) There is established in the City of Maplewood within Development District No. 1 a tax increment financing district to be known as Housing District No. 1 -2 the initial boundaries of which are fixed and determined as shown on the attached Exhibit D incorporated herein by reference. 4. Tax Increment Financing Plan. The tax increment financing plan is adopted as the tax increment financing plan for the Tax Increment Financing Districts, and the City Council makes the following findings: a) Economic Development District No. 1 -1 is an economic development district as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, the specific basis for such determination being: Economic Development District No. 1 -1 is being created so that the tax increments derived therefrom can be used to fund the public improvements set forth in the development program which will stimulate additional de- velopment in Development District No. 1, thereby creating new jobs and expanding the City's tax base. b) Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 are housing districts as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, the specific basis for such determination being: Housing District No. 1-1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 each consist of rental housing projects. Not less than twenty percent of the. rental units within both Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 will be rented to low and moderate income persons and families which are defined by federal law to be persons and families whose income does not exceed eight percent of the median family income for the Saint Paul /Minne- apolis area. c) The proposed redevelopment in the opinion of the City Council, would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonable fore- seeable future and therefore the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. The reasons supporting this . finding are that: The development activities within Development District No. 1 to be financed by tax increment financing are not financeable usin g traditional methods of municipal financing. Private in- vestment will not finance these development activities because of prohibitive costs. It is necessary to finance these develop- ment activities through the use of tax increment financing so that other development by private enterprise will occur within Development District No. 1. Mo 9 - 10/28 d) The tax increment financing plan for the Tax Increment Districts conforms to the general plan for development or redevelopment of the City of Maplewood as a whole. The reasons for supporting this finding are that: 1) The Tax Increment Districts are properly zoned; 2) The tax increment financing plan will generally compliment and serve to implement policies adopted in the City's Com- prehensive Plan. e) The tax increment financing plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City of Maplewood as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the Tax Increment Districts by private enter- prise. The reasons supporting this finding are that: As previously stated the development activities, consist- ing of public improvements, to be financed by tax incre- ment financing are necessary so that additional commercial and housing development by private enterprise can occur within Development District No. 1. 5. Public Purpose The development program for Development District No. l and the adoption of the tax increment financing plan for the Tax Increment Districts conform in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will help fulfill a need to develop an area of the City which is already built up to provide employment opportunities to improve the tax base, and to improve the general economy of the State and thereby serves a public purpose. 6. Certification The Auditor of Ramsey County is requested to certify the original assessed value of the Tax Increment Districts as described in the tax increment financing plan, and to certify in each year thereafter the amount by which the original assessed value has increased or decreased in accordance with the Act; and the Acting City Manager is authorized and directed to forthwith transmit this request to the County Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor may specify, together with a list of all properties within the Tax Increment Districts for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding the adoption of this Resolution. 7. Filing. The Acting City Manager is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the development program and tax increment financing plan for the Tax Increment Districts with the Commissioner of Energy and Economic Development. 8. Administration The administration of Development District No. 1 is assigned to the Acting City Manager who shall from time to time be granted such powers and duties pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 472A.09 and 472.10 as the City Council may deem appropriate. 10 - 10/28 Seconded by lmember Anderson. h. Councilmember Bastian moved to amend the previous resolution to allocate 1,000,000 for the McKnight Road water line and the water tower and the re- mainder of the $4,246,000 be allocated to undesignated projects. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. Voting on original motion Ayes - all. 3. 7:20 P.M., Plan Amendment and Feasibility : Southlawn Drive a" Mayor Greavu convened meeting for a public hearing regarding a proposal to amend the land use plan to designate the Southlawn Drive corridor as a major collector street and to find the construction of Southlawn Drive to be con- sistent with the revised land use plan. b. Acting City Manager Haider presented the Staff report. C. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposals. The following were heard: Thomas Zacharias, C.P. David Selgren, representing Robert Hajicek Richard Dreher, Joseph Co. Steven Korstad, representing his father, William Korstad David Bishop, representing William Korstad Albert Goins, representing his mother, Jean Goins Kenneth Bowser James Brill, attorney for United Artists d. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. e. Councilmember Anderson moved the feasibility of constructing Southlawm from Beam Avenue to County Road D and that the owners of property the length of the roadway dedicate the necessary right of way. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Councilmember Bastian moved to table these items until the Meeting of November 6, 1985. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Bastian, Maida and Wasiluk Nay - Councilmember Anderson 4. Kennel Permit : 1497 E. Larpenteur Avenue a. Mayor Greavu stated the applicant has withdrawn her application for a kennel license. The applicant, Lisa Thell, stated she is removing one dog from the property. b. The following area residents expressed their concerns regarding the dogs at 1497 E. Larpenteur Avenue: Mrs. Peg Pollo, 1712 Barclay St. 11 - 10/28 Mr. John Bergquist, 1707 Barclay Street C. Council directed Staff to make sure that there are only two ( 2 ) dogs at 1497 E. Larpenteur and to take whatever steps necessary to insure that the animal control ordinance is enforced. 59 7:40 P.M., I.R.B. : C.S.M., Inc. a. Mayor Greavu stated C.S.M., Inc., had withdrawn their request for an I.R.B. b. Mary Ippel, Briggs and Morgan, bonding consultant, stated Edina Realty and C and White Bear Associates are requesting I.R.B.'s in place of the al- location for C.S.M., Inc. c. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 85 - 10 - 164 RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, AND AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF A NOTICE OF THE HEARING WHEREAS, a) Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, known as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (the "Act "), gives munici- palities the power to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of the encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to prevent so far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; b) The City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, the "City ") , has received from a general partnership to be organi- zed under the laws of the State of Minnesota with Ron Peltier, Larry Davis and Richard Olson, as the general partners (the "Company ") , a proposal that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter described, through the issuance of its industrial revenue bonds which may be in the form of one or two single debt instrument) the "Bonds") pursuant to the Act; and c) Before proceeding with consideration of the request of the Company, it is necessary for the City to hold a public hearing on the proposal pursuant to Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b, Minnesota Statutes: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. A public hearing on the proposal of the Company will be held at the time and place set forth in the Notice of Hearing hereto attached. 12 - 10/28 2. The general nature of the proposal and an estimate of the prin- cipal amount of bonds to be issued to finance the proposal are described in the attached form of Notice of Hearing* 3. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Commissioner of Energy and Economic Development, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together with proposed forms of all attachments and exhibits thereto, is on file in the office of the Clerk. 4. The Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the hearing to be given one publication in the official newspaper and also in a newspaper of general circulation available in the City, not less than 15 days nor more than 30 days prior to the date fixed for the hearing, substantially in the form of the attached Notice of Public Hearing. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, will meet at the City Hall in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, at 7:10 P.M. on November 25, 1985, to consider the proposal of a Minnesota general partnership to be formed with Ron Peltier, Larry Davis and Richard Olson, as the general partners (the "Company "), that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter described by the issuance of a series of industrial development revenue bonds. Description of Project Land acquisition, construction and equipping of an approximately 21,000 square foot office facility located on the East side of White Bear Avenue between Lydia Avenue and Beam Avenue directly North of the Maplewood East Shopping Center in the City. The maximum aggregate estimated principal amount of bonds or other obligations to be issued to finance each project.is $1,500,000. The project will be initially owned and operated by the Company and is to J be leased to Edina Realty. The bonds or other obligations if and when issued will not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance upon any property of the City except the project, and such bonds or obligations will not be a charge against the City's general credit or taxing powers but will be payable from sums to be paid by the Company pursuant to revenue agreements. Draft copies of the proposed applications to the Commissioner of Energy and Economic Development, State of Minnesota, for approval of the projects, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, is available for public inspection from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, at the City Hall in Maplewood, Minnesota. 13 - 10/28 At the time and place fixed for the Public Hearing, the City Council of the City of Maplewood will give all persons who appear at the hearing an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal. In addition, interested persons may file written comments respecting the proposal with the Clerk at or prior to said public hearing. Dated this 28th day of October, 1985. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL) By Lucille Aurelius /s/ Clerk Seconded by Councilmembe r Maida. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Maida and Wasiluk Councilmember Bastian abstained. d. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 85 - 10 - 165 RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT TO THE COMMISSIONER OF ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA,, AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT WHEREAS, a) The purpose of Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, known as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial DeveloAment Act (the "Act"),, as found and determined by the legislature, is to promote the welfare of the state by the active attraction and encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to prevent so far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; b) Factors necessitating the active promotion and develop- ment of economically sound industry and commerce are the increasing concentration of population in the metropolitan governmental ser- vices required to meet the needs of the increased population and the need for development of land use which will provide an adequate tax base to finance these increased costs and access to employment opportunities for such population; 14 - 10/28 c) The City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, the "City "), has received from a general partnership to be or- ganized under the laws of the State of Minnesota with Ron Peltier, Larry Davis and Richard Olson, as the general partners (the "Com- pany"), a proposal that the City assist in financing a Project hereinafter described, through the issuance of a Revenue Bond or Bonds or a Revenue Note or Notes (hereinafter referred to in this resolution as "Revenue Bonds ") pursuant to the Act; d) The City desires to facilitate.the selective development of the community,.retain and improve the tax base and help to pro - vide the range of services and employment opportunities required by the population; and the Project will assist the City in achieving those objectives; the Project will help to increase assessed valua- tion of the City and help maintain a positive relationship between assessed valuation and debt and enhance the image and reputation of the community; e) The Project to be financed by the Revenue Bonds is an approximately 21,000 square foot office facility to be located on the East side of White Bear Avenue between Lydia Avenue and Beam Avenue directly North of Maplewood East Shopping Center in the City and consists of the acquisition of land and the construction of buildings and improvements thereon and the installation of equip- ment therein, all to be constructed pursuant to the Company's specifications and to be initially owned and operated by the Com- pany and leased to Edina Realty (the "Project ") and will result in the employment of additional persons to work within the new facilities; f) The City has been advised by representatives of the Com- pany that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital cost of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of oper- ating the Project would be significantly reduced, and the Company has also advised this Council that the Project would not be under- taken but for the availability of industrial development bond financing; g) Pursuant to a resolution of the City Council adopted on October 28, 1985, a public hearing on the Project will be held on November 25, 1985, after notice is published and materials made available for public inspection at the City Hall, all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b, at which public hearing all those appearing who desire to speak will be heard and written comments will be accepted; and h) Prior to the holding of said public hearing, it is neces- sary and convenient to notify the Commissioner of Energy and Econo- mic Development (the "Commissioner ") of the City's intention to issue its commercial development revenue bonds for this Project; and 15 - 10/28 i) No public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly benefit financially from the Project: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Council hereby gives preliminary approval to the proposal of the Company that the City undertake the Project pursuant to the Act and pursuant to a revenue agreement between the City and Company con- taining such terms and conditions (with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary) as may be necessary to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal of and interest on the Revenue Bonds in the maximum aggregate principal amount of 1,500,700, to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project. Said revenue agreement may also provide for the entire interest of the Company therein to be mort- gaged to the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds. The City hereby undertakes preliminarily to issue its Revenue Bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions. 2. On'the basis of information available to this Council, it appears, and the Council hereby finds, that the Project constitutes properties, real and personal, used or useful in connection with one or more revenue producing enterprises engaged in any business within the meaning of Sub- division la of Section 474.02 of the Act; that the Project furthers the purposes stated in Section 474.01 of the Act; that the Project would not be undertaken but for the availability of industrial development bond financing under the Act the willingness of the City to furnish such financing; and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the development of economically sound industry and commerce, to assist in the prevention of the emergence of blighted and marginal land, to help prevent chronic unemployment, to help the City retain and improve the tax base and to provide the range of service and employment opportuni- ties required by the population, to help prevent the movement of talented and educated persons out of the State and to areas within the State where their services may not be as effectively used, to promote more intensive development and use of land within the City, and eventually to increase the tax base of the community. 3. The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by the City subject to later preliminary approval by this City Council after a hearing on the Project and further subject to the approval of the Project by the Commis- sioner or such other state officer having authority to grant approval and subject to final approval by this Council, the Company, and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the ultimate details of the financing of the Project. 4. The Company has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project, whether or not the Project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by the Commissioner, will be paid by the Company. 16 - 10/28 5. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, is authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Project and the notification of the Commissioner of the City's intent to issue its commercial develop- ment revenue bonds for this Project, and to submit such documents to the Mayor or Clerk or both for .submission to the Commissioner. 6. The Mayor or Clerk or both are hereby authorized and directed to submit to the Commissioner on or before October 31, 1985, a certi- fied copy of this resolution as necessary evidence and notice of the City's intent to issue its commercial development revenue bonds for this Project on or before December 31, 19850 7. Nothing in this resolution or in the documents prepared pur- suant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose. 8. In anticipation of the approval by the Commissioner and the issuance of the Revenue Bonds to finance all or a portion of Project, and in anticipation that the City will procure and devote to the Revenue Bonds an adequate allocation of authority to issue private activity bonds (which allocation is not made hereby), and in order that completion of the Project will not be unduly delayed when approved, the Company is hereby authorized to make such expen- ditures and advances toward payment of that portion of the costs of the Project to be financed from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds as the Company considers necessary, including the use of interim, short - term financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds if and when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the City. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Maida and Wasiluk Councilmember Bastian abstained. e. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85 - 10 - 166 RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, AND AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF A NOTICE OF THE HEARING WHEREAS, a) Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, known as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (the "Act "), gives munici- palities the power to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of the encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to prevent so far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; 17 - 10/28 b) The City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota the "City "), has received from C and White Bear Avenue Associ- ates, a general partnership to be organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota with Gerald C. Mogren, as a general partner the "Company ") , a proposal that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter described, through the issuance it its in- dustrial revenue bonds (which may be in the form of one or two single debt instrument) (the "Bonds ") pursuant to the Act; and c) Before proceeding with consideration of the request of the Company, it is necessary for the City to hold a public hear- ing on the proposal pursuant to Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b, Minnesota Statutes: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. A public hearing on the proposal of the Company will be held at the time and place set forth in the Notice of Hearing hereto attached. 2. The general nature of the proposal and an. estimate of the principal amount of bonds to be issued to finance the proposal are described in the attached form of Notice of Hearing. 3. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Commissioner of Energy and Economic Development, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together with proposed forms of all attachments and exhibits thereto, is on file in the office of the Clerk. 4. The Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the hearing to be given one publication in the official newspaper and also in a newspaper of general circulation available in the City, not less than 15 days nor more than 30 days prior to the date fixed for the hearing, substantially in the form of the attached Notice of Public Hearing. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, will meet at the City Hall in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, at 7:20 P.M. on November 25, 1985, to consider the proposal of C and White Bear Avenue Associates, a Minnesota general partnership to be formed with Gerald C. Mogren, as a general partner (the "Company"), that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter described by the issuance of a series of industrial development revenue bonds. Description of Project Land acquisition, construction and equipping of an approximately 21,000 square foot retail shopping center to be located at the northwest corner of the intersection of County Road C and White Bear Avenue in the City. 18 - 10/28 The maximum aggregate estimated principal amount of bonds or other obligations to be issued to finance each project is $900,000. The project will be initially owned and operated by the Company and is to be leased to various parties. The bonds or other obligations if and when issued will not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance upon any property of the City except the project, and such bonds or obligations will not be a charge against the City's general credit or taxing powers but will be payable from sums to be paid by the Company pursuant to revenue agreements. Draft copies of the proposed applications to the Commissioner of Energy and Economic Development, State of Minnesota, for approval of the projects, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, is available for public inspection from 9:00 a . m. to 5:00 p . m. , Monday through Friday, at the City Hall in Maplewood, Minnesota. At the time and place fixed for the Public Hearing, the City Council of the City of Maplewood will give all persons who appear at the hearing an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal. In addition, interested persons may file written cbmments respecting the proposal with the Clerk at or prior to said public hearing. Dated this 28th day of October, 1985. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL) By Lucille Aurelius /s/ Clerk Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Maida and Wasiluk. Councilmember Bastian abstained. f. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85 - 10 - 167 RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT TO THE COMMISSIONER OF ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT 19 - 10/28 WHEREAS, a) The purpose of Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, known as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act ( the "Act ") , as found and determined by the legislature, is to promote the welfare of the State by the active attraction and encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to prevent so far as pos- sible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; b) Factors necessitating the active promotion and development of economically sound industry and commerce are the increasing concentra- tion of population in the metropolitan areas and the rapidly rising increase in the amount and cost of governmental services required to meet the needs of the increased population and the need for develop - ment of land use which will provide an adequate tax base to finance these increased costs and access to employment opportunities for such population; c) The City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, (the City ") , has received from C and White Bear Avenue Associates, a general partnership to be organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota with Gerald C. Mogren, as a general partner (the "Company"), a proposal that the City assist in financing a Project hereinafter described, through the issuance of a Revenue Bond or Bonds or a Revenue Note or Notes (hereinafter referred to in this resolution as Revenue Bonds") pursuant to the Act; d) The City desires to facilitate the selective development of the community, retain and improve the tax base and help to provide the range of services and employment opportunities required by the population; and the Project will assist the City in achieving those objectives; the Project will help to increase assessed valuation of the City and help maintain a positive relationship between assessed valuation and debt and enhance the image and reputation of the com- munity; e) The Project to be financed by the Revenue Bonds is an ap- proximately 21,000 square foot retail shopping center facility to be located at the northwest corner of the intersection of County Road C and White Bear Avenue in the City and consists of the acqui- sition of land and the construction of buildings and improvements thereon and the installation of equipment therein, all to be con- structed pursuant to the Company's specifications and to be . initially owned and operated by the Company and leased to various parties the "Project ") , and will result in the employment of additional persons to work within the new facilities; f) The City has been advised by representatives of the Com- pany that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital cost of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the Project would be significantly reduced, and the 20 - 10/28 Company has also advised this Council that the Project would not be undertaken but for the availability of industrial develop- ment bond financing; g) Pursuant to a resolution of the City Council adopted on October 28, 1985, a public hearing on the Project will be held on November 25, 1985, after notice is published and materials made available for public inspection at the City Hall , all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b, at which public hearing all those appearing who desire to speak will be heard and written comments will be accepted; h) Prior to the holding of said public hearing, it is necessary and convenient to notify the Commissioner of Energy and Economic Development (the "Commissioner ") of the City's in- tention to issue its commercial development revenue bonds for this Project; and i) No public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly benefit financially from the Project: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Council hereby gives preliminary approval to the proposal of the Company that the City undertake the Project pursuant to the Act and pursuant to a revenue agreement between the City and Company con- taining such terms and conditions (with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary) as may be necessary to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal of and interest on the Revenue Bonds in the maximum aggregate principal amount of 900,000 to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project. Said revenue agreement may also provide for the entire interest of the Company therein to be mortgaged to the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds. The City hereby undertakes preliminarily to issue its Revenue Bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions. 2. On the basis of information available to this Council, it appears, and the Council hereby finds, that the Project constitutes properties, real and personal, used or useful in connection with one of more revenue producing enterprises engaged in any business within the meaning of Subdivision la of Section 474.02 of the Act; that the Project furthers the purposes stated in Section 474.01 of the Act; that the Project would not be undertaken but for the availability of indus- trial development bond financing under the Act and the willingness of the City to furnish such financing; and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the development of economically sound industry and commerce, to assist in the prevention of the emer- gence of blighted and marginal land, to help prevent chronic unemploy- ment, to help the City retain and improve the tax base and to provide am 21 - 10/28 the range of service and employment opportunities required by the population, to help prevent the movement of talented and educated persons out of the State and to areas within the State where their services may not be as effectively used, to promote more intensive development and use of land within the City, and eventually to in- crease the tax base of the community. 3. The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by the City subject to later preliminary approval by this City Council after a hearing on the Project and further subject to the approval of the Project by the Commissioner or such other state officer having author- ity to grant approval and subject to final approval by this Council, the Company, and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the ultimate details of the financing of the Project. 4. The Company has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project, whether or not the Project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by the Commissioner, will be paid by the Company. 5. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, is authorized to assist in the preparation and review of neces- sary documents relating to the Project and the notification of the Com- missioner of the City's intent to issue its commercial development reve- nue bonds for this Project, and to submit such documents to the Mayor or Clerk or both for submission to the Commissioner. 6. The Mayor or Clerk 'or both are hereby authorized and directed to submit to the Commissioner on or before October 31, 1985, a certified copy of this.resolution as necessary evidence and notice of the City's intent to issue its commercial development revenue bonds for this Project on or before December 31, 1985. 7. Nothing in this resolution or in the documents prepared pur- suant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or other- wise granted to the City for this purpose. 8. In anticipation of the approval by the Commissioner and the issuance of the Revenue Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Project, and in anticipation that the City will procure and devote to the Revenue Bonds an adequate allocation of authority to issue private activity bonds which allocation is not made hereby), and in order that completion of the Project will not be unduly delayed when approved, the Company is here- by authorized to make such expenditures and advances toward payment of that portion of the costs of the Project to be financed from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds as the Company considers necessary, including the use of interim, short -term financing, subject to reimbursement from the pro- ceeds of the Revenue Bonds if and when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the City. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Maida and Wasiluk Councilmember Bastian abstained. am 22 - 10/28 6. 7:50 P.M., Rezoning : North of Gervais, East of T. 61 a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposal to rezone the Miggler Truck Farm property from $-1 single dwelling to M -1 Light Manufacturing and the rezoning of a piece of City property, lying west of Gerten' s Pond, from F, farm to M -1 Light Manufacturing. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the Staff report. C. Commissioner Ralph Sletten presented the Planning Commission recommendation. d. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following expressed their views: Mrs. Rosemary Schmidt and Mr. Richard Schmidt, owners of vacant property on Clarence Street Mr. Wayne Birchem, 2523 Clarence Mr. Scott Hoffhines, 2529 Clarence Mrs. Elaine Hoffhines, 2529 Clarence Mrs.. Cheryl Gilbertson, representing Lakeview Lutheran Church Mr. George Ros sbach , 1406 E. County Road C. Mr. Gale Rehnberg, representing the Migglers e. Councilmember Bastian moved to table the rezoning proposal indefinitely Seconded by Coun cilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. G. AWARD OF BIDS None. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Edward Street a. Acting Manager Haider presented two conflicting petitions from residents on Edward Street concerning the speed bumps. b. Mr. Chuck Quistad, 1754 Phalen Place and Mrs. Kate Falk, 1777 Edward St. spoke against the speed bumps. C. Mr. Quistad stated he would circulate two petitions; one, for the speed bumps, and one, against the speed bumps and present them to Council at the meeting of November 6, 19850 I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Massage License a. Acting Manager Haider stated a background investigation was conducted on Norma - -Jean Larson and Myron Lee Larson for the purpose of receiving a massage license in the City of Maplewood. We have found that there is nothing at this point to prohibit the Larsons from obtaining such a license. Should the City Council decide to issue such a license, it should be done in accordance with Maplewood Ordinance Section 24 -61 through Section 24 -67. 23 - 10/28 b. Norma Jean Larson, the applicant, spoke on behalf of her and her husband. C. Councilmember Bastian moved to approve a massage license for Norma Jean Larson and for Myron Lee Larson, to perform thera eutic massage at the Carlton R.ac netball Building, 600 Carlton Street, in accordance with Section 24.61 throw h Section 24.67 Seconded by Councilmember Maida Ayes - all. 2. Condor Storm Sewer a. Acting Manager Haider presented a letter from the Connemara II Association requesting a review of the drainage ditch adjacent to their property. b. Mayor Gre avu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85 - 10 - 168 WHEREAS, the City Council has proposed that the area generally described as: From McKnight Road to 3600 feet East and from Lower Afton Road to 3600 Feet South, be improved by construction of storm sewer and appurtenances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the proposed improvement be referred to the City Engineer, who is hereby instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and should best be made as proposed, and the estimated cost of the improvement as.recommended. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 3. Tax - Forfeit Land Transfer Program a. Acting Manager Haider requested the Council authorize the City to take title to seven sub- standard tax - forfeited parcels and transfer them to abutting property owners for side or rear yard usage and to forgive the unpaid assess- ments against three of the seven substandard parcels. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to implement the tax - forfeited land transfer program subject to: 1. Receipt of a cash escrow of $100.00 for each property to be transferred ($500.00 for parcel four) to cover the cost of the City Attorney preparing the necessary deeds. 2. Interior lots shall be split equally between property owners along the same street, unless otherwise agreed to by the adja- cent owners. 3. The creation of flag- shaped parcels shall be avoided, unless there is no other alternative to eliminate the tax - forfeit status. 24 - 10/28 4. No parcels shall be sold to an owner who allows a parcel to go tax delinquent. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. C. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85 - 10 - 169 WHEREAS , there presently exists within the City of Maplewood certain parcels of land which cannot be improved because of non - compliance with the City's zoning code regarding minimum area, shape, frontage or access; and WHEREAS, three of said non- complying parcels have been purchased from Ramsey County by prospective developers; and WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council has consistently denied approval of requested variances with reference to similar size parcels as homesites; and WHEREAS, judicial challenges of the City's denial of requested variances have been sustained; and WHEREAS,, the processing of these variance requests iith reference to non- complying parcels is an unproductive use of the City's resources; and WHEREAS, the City proposes to apply to the County of Ramsey pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 282.01, Subdivision 7a for conveyance for the pur- pose of conveying certain of said parcels to owners of lands adjoining the tax- forfeited parcels in question for the creation of additional side yards; WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to combine said parcels with abutting property for the purpose of eliminating public nuisances and re- turning to the tax roles land otherwise unproductive. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Maplewood City Council that appli- cation is hereby made to Ramsey County seeking conveyance pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 282.01, Subdivision 7a, those parcels of real property hereinbelow described for the purpose of resale to owners of lands adjoining the land to be transferred hereby: Property Tax I.D. No. 57- 58800 - 010 -02 57- 29800- 161 -05 57- 81500- 270 -01 57- 48950 - 010 -06 57 -24700 - 040 -01 57- 00410 - 120 -02 57- 03500 - 040 -92 15- 29- 22 -12- 0005 -9) 15- 29- 22 -32- 0069 -1) 15-29-22-34-0079-2) 25- 29- 22 -12- 0098 -0) 17- 29- 22- 21- 0013 -6) 04-29-22-11-0001-4) 35-30-22-43-0002-4) 25 - 10/28 Recording of deeds for each land transfer is subject to: 1. Receipt of a cash escrow of $100.00 for each property to be trans- ferred to cover the cost of the City attorney preparing the neces- sary deeds. 2. Interior lots shall be split equally between property owners along the same street, unless otherewise agreed to by the adjacent owners. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. d. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85- 10- 170 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution Nos. 59 -9 -76, 62 -8 -194, 66 -9 -271, and 78-8-174 of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, adopted 9 -3 -59, 8- 30 -62, 9-15-66 and 8-22-78, the special assessments for the construction of Sanitary Sewer No. 1, Burke and Kennard Street Improvement, Water Improvement No. 5 and Water Improvement 75-16, were levied against property described as Lot One, Block Two, Pflueger's Addition, Section 15, Township 29, Range 22; and WHEREAS, the above- described property was tax - forfeited on the 15th day of August, 1967; and WHEREAS, this parcel has substantially substandard dimensions for a homesite; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it in the public interest to cancel the above- described assessments to: (1) be able to collect any future assess- ments for public improvements benefiting this property, (2) receive an annual real estate tax from this property, and (3) establish a responsible party to resolve any nuisance complaints. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNE- SOTA, that the assessments for Sanitary Sewer No. 1, Burke and Kennard Street Improvement, Water Improvement No. 5 and Water Improvement No. 75 -16 in the amount against $790.30 be, and the same hereby are canceled, subject to combination of this property with an abutting property for side yard usage only. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. e. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85 - 10 - 171 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution Nos. 59 -9 -76, 63 -8 -152 and 78 -8 -174 of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, adopted 9 -3 -59, 8- 29 -63, and 8- 22 -78, the special assessments for the construction of Sanitary Sewer No. 1, Water Improvement 2 and Water 75-16 were levied against property described as Lot Sixteen, Block Five, Gladstone Addition, Section 5, Town- ship 29, Range 22; and am 26 - 10/28 WHEREAS, the above- described property was tax - forfeited on the 28th day of July, 1971; and WHEREAS, this property has substantially substandard dimensions for use as a homesite; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it in the public interest to cancel the above- described assessments to: (1) be able to collect any future assessments for public .improvements benefiting this property, (2) re- ceive an annual real estate tax from this property, and ( 3) establish a responsible party to resolve any nuisance complaints. NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUr1CIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the assessments for Sanitary Sewer 1, Water 2 and Water 75-16 in the amount against $560.00 be, and the same hereby are canceled, subject to combination of this property with an property for side yard usage only. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. f. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85 - 10 - 172 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution Nos. 59 -9 -76, 68 -9 -182, 69 -9 -159, and 78 -8 -174 of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, adopted 9 -3 -59, 9- 24 -68, 9-10-69 and 8- 22 -78, the special assessments for the construction of Sanitary Sewer No. 1, Improvement 67 -1, Improvement 67 and Water 75 -16, were levied against property described as Lot 27, Block Two, Warren and Flint's Addition, Section 15, Township 29, Range 22; and WHEREAS, the above- described property was tax - forfeited on the 13th day of September, 1977; and WHEREAS, this property has substantially substandard dimensions for a homesite; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it in the public interest to cancel the above- described assessments to: (1) be able to collect any future assessments for public improvements benefiting this property, (2) receive an annual real estate tax from this property, and (3) establish a respon- sible party to resolve any nuisance complaints. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the assessments for San Sewer 1, Improvement 67 -1, Imp. 67 and Water 75 -16 in the amount against $732.63 be, and the same hereby are canceled, subject to combination of this property with an abut- ting property for side yard usage only. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 27 - 10/28 J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Archer Heights a. Councilmember. Wasiluk stated the residents at Archer Heights are re- questing a bus shelter. b. Staff will investigate. 2. Citizen's Concerns a. Councilmember Maida stated while campaigning, a number of citizen's concerns were made known, such as having more maple trees in the City and also longer hours for the licensing department. 3. Frost Avenue Improvement I . Councilmember Anderson questioned what progress there is regarding the Frost Avenue improvements. b. Staff stated they are meeting with the Burlington - Northern representa- tives regarding the right of way. 4. Don John Property a. Councilmember Anderson stated residents are complaining about the Don John property again. b. Staff will investigate. 5. Phalen Place Lights 4 a. Councilmember Anderson stated residents on Phalen Place are requesting speed control and more lighting. b. Staff to investigate. 6. St. John's a. Councilmember Bastian reminded the Council of the Annual St. John's Wine and Cheese function at the Landmark Center at 7:00 P.M., Tuesday, October 28, 1985. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Certification of Sewer Bills a. Mayor Greavu moved to certify $11,409.88 of delinquent sewer rental bills against the McKnight Townhouse, McKnight Road and Linwood Avenue. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. am 28 - 10/28 b. Councilmember Anderson moved to charge a late penalty on the delin- uent sewer bill of 10% on the un aid amount as reflected in the ordinance Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. M. ADJOURNMENT 11.17 -P, M. City Clerk 29 - 10/28 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Wednesday, November 6, 1985 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting 85 -24 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order by Mayor Greavu at 7:40 P.M. Charlotte Wasiluk was sworn in and took her seat as a Councilmember to complete the two -year term vacated by the death of Councilmember Michael Wasiluk. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian Present MaryLee Maida Present Charlotte Wasiluk Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Aqenda as amended 1. Kinderhaus - Cope Avenue 2. Storm Sewer - Radatz Avenue 3. Council Rules of Procedures - Amendment 4. H -2 Southlawn Drive 5. G -1 Maplewood In Motion Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Anderson moved, seonded by Councilmember Wasiluk, Ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda, Items 1 and 2 as recommended 1. Accounts Payable Approved the Accounts (Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses Check Register dated October 28, 1985, through October 31, 1985 - $462,137.57 : Part II - Payroll dated November 01, 1985 - $124,547.17) in the amount of $586,684.74. 2. Investment Authorization Resolution No.. 85 - 11 - 173 BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the individuals named below are authorized to open an account in the name of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, with one or 11/06 Q 0 more of the Franklin Group of Funds ( "Funds ") and to deposit such funds in this account as they deem necessary, that the persons authorized below may endorse checks and other instruments for deposit in said account and that checks or drafts withdrawing said funds may be signed by any one of the persons authorized below. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Funds, its Custodian Bank, Bank of America, Franklin Admistrative Services, Inc., and Franklin Distributors, Inc., shall be held harmless and fully protected in relying from time to time upon any certifications by the City Council as to the names of indivi- duals occupying such offices and in acting in reliance upon the foregoing resolutions until actual receipt by them of a certified copy of a resolu- tion of the City Council modifying or revoking any or all such resolutions. The undersigned further certifies that the following individuals occupy the offices designated: z Daniel F. Faust, Finance Director. Signature Arline J. Hagen, City Treasurer F. PUBLIC HEARINGS X Signature 1. 7:10 P.M., P.U.D. and Variances : Harmony School Site a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Smith Investment Properties for approval of a conditional use permit for a planned unit development (P.U.D.) of Commercial uses and mul- tiple dwelling, older adult housing and approval of variances for the total number of spaces required and waive the requirement for garages for the 52- unit residence. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the Staff report. c. Mr. Tony Danna, Attorney for Smith Investments, spoke on behalf of the proposal. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard: Mrs. Delores Ethier, 2187 Flora Drive, White Bear Lake, owner of property at 2005 E. County Road C. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 2 - 11/06 85 - 11 - 174 WHEREAS, Smith Investment Properties initiated a conditional use permit for the Harmony School site planned unit development of older adult housing and commercial uses, including parking space variances, at the following - described property: Beginning at the intersection of White Bear Avenue and the south line of the SW 1/4; thence northerly on said centerline 420.55 feet; thence east parallel with said south line 311 feet; thence northerly parallel with said centerline 140 feet, thence due north 107.07 feet, thence east 391.55 feet to a point 658.95 feet north from said south line, thence to said south line at a point 200 feet west of southwest 1/4 corner; thence west to beginning, subject to roads in Section 2, Township 29, Range 22. This property is also known as the former Harmony School site, Maple- wood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by Smith Investment Properties, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on November 4, 1985. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said permit be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on November 6, 1985. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also con- sidered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, the variances requested in conjunction with this planned unit development are: 1. A parking space variance of 25 spaces. Section 36 -11 (a) (2) requires at least two parking spaces per dwelling unit or 104 spaces for the 52 -unit residence - 70 spaces are proposed. 2. An enclosed parking space variance of 52 spaces. Section 36 - (a) ( 2 ) requires at least one half of the required parking spaces for a multiple dwelling to be enclosed. No en- closed spaces are proposed for the 52 -unit residence. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that a condi- tional use permit be granted for the Harmony School site planned unit develop- ment, including the following variances: 3 - 11/06 1. Allow 79 parking spaces for the 52 -unit seniors' residence, rather than the 104 required by code. 2. Allow 26 enclosed parking spaces rather than the 52 enclosed spaces required by the code. Approval of the conditional use permit and variances is subject to: 1. If Council determines that there is insufficient on -site parking for the 52 -unit seniors' residence, within one year of 950 oc- cupancy, additional parking may be required. 2. Maplewood and North St. Paul shall have continued use of the athletic facilities in the northeast portion of the site until that part of the site develops, provided the use of these faci- lities does not interfere with the applicant's use of the property. 3. The 52 -unit seniors' residence shall not be converted to nonseniors' housing without revision of the planned unit development. For pur- poses of this permit, seniors' housing is defined as a residence occupied by persons in their retirement years with a significant number of one - person households. 4. The auditorium attached to the 52 -unit seniors' residence shall only be used by the residents of that building. Public assembly unrelated to senior use would be prohibited without a revision of this permit. 5. The commercial portion of the development shall be limited to the uses allowed in the BC (M) , business commercial (modified) zoning district. 6. The eight parking spaces (marked "future ") located south of the driveway to the garage for the 64 -unit structure shall be con- structed. 7. The proposed 575 square foot units in the 52 -unit residence (October 8, 1985 plans) shall be increased in area to at least 580 square feet of habitable f loor area. 8. Move the 64 -unit residence to the west to comply with the required minimum setback of 50 feet. 9. Adherence to the site plan dated October 8, 1985, except as required in these conditions, unless a change is approved by the Community De- sign Review Board. Approval of the planned unit development is recommended on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare . 4 - 11/06 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or distrubing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, t glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City., 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval of the parking space variances is recommended on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The parking space requirements contained in the zoning code do not realistically apply to the proposed development because these re- quirements are designed for family housing and do not consider the fewer number of cars per unit needed for senior housing. 2. The variances would be consistent with the purposes of this chapter because they would not result in the need to park vehicles off -site and because they would be consistent with similar variances granted for the Hazel Ridge and Concordia Arms seniors' residences. No park- i.ng problem has occurred at Concordia Arms. Hazel Ridge is scheduled for construction in the Fall of 1985. 3. The planned unit development would produce a development of equal or superior quality to that which would result from strict adher- ence to the provisions of this chapter. 4. The variances would not constitute a threat of a substantive nature to the property values,. safety, health or general welfare of the owners or occupants of adjacent or nearby land, not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals or general welfare of the people. 5 The variances are required for reasonable and practicable physical development and are not required solely on the basis of financial considerations. 5 - 11/06 6. If a parking problem were to occur, adequate room exists on the site to provide additional parking spaces. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. G. AWARD OF BIDS 10 Maplewood In Motion a. Acting Manager Haider presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85 - 11 175 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Sexton Printing in the amount of $7,185.60 per year is the lowest responsible bid for the publication of four issues of MAPLEWOOD IN MOTION and the proper City officials are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of.the City. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Edward Street a. Mr. Chuck Quistad, 1754 Phalen Place, submitted the results of a questionaire he circulated to the residences on Edward Street regarding the speed bumps. The results are as follows: Do you think the speed bumps: 1. are effective in significantly reducing the speed of cars in that area? Yes No No Opinion 10 26 2 2. should be removed? Yes No No Opinion 25 9 3 b. Mr. George Aston, 1732 Edward Street, presented his opinions. C.. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85 - 11 - 176 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, CITY COUNCIL that the recently installed "speed bumps" and warning signs on Edward Street be removed. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 6 - 11/06 2. Southlawn Drive a. Acting Manager Haider presented the Staff report. This matter was contin- ued from the October 28, 1985, meeting. b. The following persons presented their views regarding the construction of Southlawn Drive: Mr. Dave Seligren, representing Robert Haj:icek. Mr. Tom Zacharias, representing C.P.I., owners of the Maplewood Mall Mr. Albert Goins, 1741 E. County Road D Mr. Gene Wilson, representing Robert Hajicek Mr. Dick Dreher, representing the Joseph Co. c. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. d. Councilmember Maida introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85 - 11 - 177 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan to designate the Southlawn Drive corridor, between Beam Avenue and County Road D, as a major collector street. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 21, 1985, to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Planning Commission recom- mended to the City Council that said plan amendment be approved. 2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on November 6, 1985. The Council considered reports and recommenda- tions from the Planning Commission and City Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described plan amendment be approved on the basis that traffic studies have documented the need for Southlawn Drive as a collector between Beam Avenue and County Road D. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. e. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85 - 11 - 178 WHEREAS, after due notice of public hearing on the construction of street improvements on Southlawn Drive from Beam Avenue to County Road D a hearing on said improvement in accordance with the notice duly given was duly held on October 28, 1985, and the Council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; 7 - 11/06 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That it is advisable, expedient, and necessary that the City of Maplewood construct street improvements on Phase I of South - lawn Drive from Beam Avenue to County Road D as described in the notice of hearing thereon, and the same to be made. 2. The City Engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. f. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85 - 11 - 179 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, CITY COUNCIL that the Staff is directed to use the following financing concept in a general way to imple- ment Project 85-17: The project would include a street as shown in the feasibility study and necessary utilities from Beam Avenue to County Road D.. Right -of- way acquisition would be accomplished through agreement with the prop- erty owners. It is expected that some property acquired would be pur- chased. Proponents of the project would be expected to dedicate the required easements and.right -of -way. Assessments would be the main source of financing for the project. The specific amount for each parcel would be based on benefit accruing to the property. The City would of course hold the assessment hearing and let the appeal period expire prior to awarding a . const contract or paying for right -of -way. The net effect of this plan is to lower the public subsidy for the project to $411,000. This amount would be financed by a combination of state aid and tax - increment funds. The concept proposed here is consistent with the City Council's usual approach to developing public streets. Southlawn represents only a fraction of the street mileage required to complete the system in this area. This concept may serve as an example for future financing pro- posals. ESTIMATED FINANCING SUMMARY Const. R/W Total Assess Cost Cost Cost Funds 560,000 $287,000 $847,000 $436,000 8 _ MSAS Funds 206, 000 T.I.F. Funds 205,000 11/06 0 I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Cope Avenue Feasibility Study a. Assistant City Engineer Chuck Ahl presented the feasibility study for the construction of Cope Avenue from Craig Street to Ariel Street that addresses horizontal and vertical alignment of Cope Avenue from Craig Street to White 4 Bear Avenue. b. The following area residents spoke against the construction: Mrs. Joatz Themmes , 1928 Castle Mrs. Marsha Haldren Mr. Pat Haldran c. Councilmember Anderson moved to deny the feasibility study Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 2.. Canvas of Election a. Acting Manager Haider presented the results of the November 5, 1985 Election. b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85 - 11 - 180 RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, acting as a canvassing board on November 6, 1985, hereby certifies the following results of the November 5, 1985, City General Election and the City Special General Election as follows: MAYOR Lester G. Axdahl 1236 John C.' Greavu 1279 Everyman 1 Gary Bastian 1 Latimer 1 COUNCILMEMBER - 4 YEAR TERM Norman G. Anderson 1672 Frances L. Juker 1246 MaryLee Maida 1049 Paul Poliachik 670 COUNCILMEMBER - 2 YEAR TERM Audrey M. Duellman 1003 Charlotte Wasiluk 1488 Fran Juker 1 H. Warren Schmidt 1 John E. MacDonald 1 Pamela Juker 1 9 - 11/06 r Gerald Cold 1 Albert Goins 1 Dennis Larson 1 Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. J. VISITOR PRESENTATION None. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Kinderhaus a. Councilmember Wasiluk received a call from the owner of Kinderhaus stating that, because of taxes and licensing costs, etc., he was forced out of business. b.. Staff stated they were informed New Horizon had purchased Kinderhaus. 2. Storm Sewer - Radatz Avenue a. Councilmember Anderson stated the storm sewer located opposite the driveway to the Norman Plaza on Radatz Avenue was plugged. b. Staff to investigate. 3. Council Rules of Procedures a. Councilmember Bastian suggested an amendment to the Rules of Procedures. The amendment would rule out Council decisions being made outside of a Council meeting. b. Referred to Staff. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS None. M. ADJO 11.25 P.M. City Clerk 10 - 11/06 V3 MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING, NOVEMBER 21, 1985 MINUTES OF MEETING The Special Meeting convened at 5:00 p.m. at the Maple-wood City Hall, p Present: Mayor and all four Councilmen City Attorney Donald L. Lais Councilperson -elect Fran Jueker Discussion was held relative to the selection of a new City Manager, Mr. Lais reported that he had in excess of 100 applicants,and that at least forty of these applicants were from the StateofMinnesotaorhadrecentmanagerialgovernmentalexperienceintheStateofMinnesotaandaorthemetropolitanarea. Thereafter, the Council. discussed this fact and determined as a group that it preferred that the new manager have recent experience in municipal government in the State of Minnesota at the managerial level, and instructed Mr. Lais to inform all of those who did not have such experience that they would not be considered any further in the selection process. Councilman Maida suggestged that the manager should either have.the following abilities or qualifications: 1. To stimulate employee productivity. 2. To engage in financial planning for the City, to be knowledgeable on bonding and bonding procedures, and able to communi- cate this knowledge effectively to the Council. 3. To have had negotiating experience and skills in personnel and labor negotiations. 4. To "speak softly and carry a big stick ", preferring that the manager not publicly attack other public officials. Councilman Norman Anderson indicated the followingrequirements: 1. That the City Manager preferably reside in the City of Maplewood. 2. That the new Manager have at least five years of experience working in a city in a managerial or professional capacity. 3. That the Manager be aware that he must attend meetings of all sorts. 4. That there would be involvement; that is, stimulate City activities that are identified as Maplewood activities. Councilman vw.s!Jjk indicated a strong desire for more ppidentificationofMaplewood, such as City support for localindustryandcommerce. Councilman Bastian indicated, in addition to the above,that he would want the Manager to be skilled and knowledgeableintheintricaciesoflawsandtheeformofgovernmentoftheCityofMaplewood, together,with an understanding f the statutoryystructureandoperativepersonneloftheMetropolitanCouncilthelocalschooldistrict, the County of Ramsey and the StateofMinnesota. The Mayor and all Council Members concurred in theabove. Thereafter, each member of the Council, including the Mayor, were given a packet of eight resume's from applicantswhohadMinnesotaexperienceorwerecurrentlyemployedin professional or managerial positions in governmental agencieswithintheState. The Council then individually went througheachoneofitspacketsandexchangedthem, so that the reviewedalloftheresumes, and then in Y instructed Mr. Lais to select ten of the most promising resume's to be resubmitted at a s ecial meeting on December 5, 1985 posesp of evaluation andforpurposes p determination of which of those would be selected for interviews. The meeting was then concluded. 3- 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER f CHECK N09 DATE AMOUNT VENDOI ITEM DESCRIPTI.Oh 305456 11/12/85 10085 STAKNKE JJLIE REFUND s MANUAL CHECKS FOR NOVEMBER 1985 Page: 1 i INSURANCE INSURANCE INSURANCE PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH P/R DEDUCT LICENSE LICENSE 10.85 4 305830 11/12/85 419.42 BLUE CROSS 305830 11/12/85 420.92 BLUE CROSS 305830 11/12/85 39903.38 BLUE CROSS 4,743.72 305H10 11/12/85 20.02 HAGEN ARLINE 303,410 11/12/85 5.30 HAGEN ARLINE 305H10 11/12/85 8.10 HAGEN ARLINE 305H10 11/12/85 3.00 HAGEN ARLINE 305H10 11/12/85 3900 HAGEN AILI NE 305H10 11/12/85 6.29 HAGEN ARLINE 45.71 305K20 11/12/85 145.00 KANE IOSE4ARY 145.00 Jr 335M69 11/12/85 119269937 MINN STAT= TREAS 305MG9 11/12/85 389.50 MINN STATE TREAS 119658987 t INSURANCE INSURANCE INSURANCE PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH P/R DEDUCT LICENSE LICENSE 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER F re CHECK N0.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 305M76 11/12/85 69978.63 MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 305M76 11/12/85 99 MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 16 *309 tf #tt 305M95 11/12/85 110000 M•R•° *A•TRAVEL TRAINING 305t495 11/12/85 121.25 M.R.P.A.TRAVEL TRAINING 395M95 17/12/85 110.00 M•R.P•A•TRAVEL TRAINING 341.25 305R09 11/12/85 110000 RAMSEY CO EASEMENT EEE 110.00 i i i i i 303849 11112185 30000 NAIL REG'ISTRY EMT EDIT TESTING 30.00 t 30BA05 11/1.2/85 361.55 AFSCME UNION DUES PBL 3JBA05 11/12/85 5.74 AFSCME UNION DUES PBL 367.?9 30BC35 11/12/85 189703.50 CTY CNYY R UNION CREDIT UN 18.703.50 R4 CHECK REGISTER F VENDOR ITEM DESCRI PTI ICMA DEFERRED COMP ICMA DEFERRED COMP MN FE3 SAVINGS FWT PBL MN MJTJAL INS INSURANCE MN ST COMA /REV SWT PBL MN ST RETIREMENT DEFERRED COMP MN ST RETIREMENT DEFERRED COMP MINN STATE TREAS LICENSE MINN STATE TREAS LICENSE MN ST TREAS S/S S/S P3L MN ST TREAS S/S S/S PBL 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD a CHECK Nb.DATE AMOUNT 30BI15 11/12/85 29487.93 308115 11/12/85 664058 3! 152.51 308M52 11/12/85 16 169213o47 303M61 11/12/85 310.00 310.00 303M65 11/12/85 6 , 0689048 69689.48 303M53 11/12/85 25.54 30 8MG8 11/12/85 18.46 44000 30SM69 11/12/85 79804.39 30SM69 11/12/85 266.00 89070.39 30SM70 11/12/85 49252.75 30SM70 11/12/85 49252.75 8, 505.50 R4 CHECK REGISTER F VENDOR ITEM DESCRI PTI ICMA DEFERRED COMP ICMA DEFERRED COMP MN FE3 SAVINGS FWT PBL MN MJTJAL INS INSURANCE MN ST COMA /REV SWT PBL MN ST RETIREMENT DEFERRED COMP MN ST RETIREMENT DEFERRED COMP MINN STATE TREAS LICENSE MINN STATE TREAS LICENSE MN ST TREAS S/S S/S P3L MN ST TREAS S/S S/S PBL AN0UNT 719e50 719.50 9 9 006.74 193.00 193.00 180.00 306.00 9,798.74 7.00 7.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOI ITEM DESCRIPTIOt F i 22.67 71.84 6.40 2.55 3.20 9.60 6.40 14.84 137.20 78.32 MN TEAMST_AS MINN STAT= TREAS MINN STAT= TREAS MINN STAT= TREAS MINN STAT= TREAS MINN STAT= TREAS T J AUTO 'ARTS A T 9 T A T L T A T & T A T 8 T A T 8 T A T T A T 8 T A T 8 T A T L T AT &T UNION DUES PSL LICENSE LICENSE LICENSE LICENSE LICENSE SUPPLIES TELEPHONE TELPHONE TELEPHONE TELPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 4 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK N0.DATE t 30 3 M75 11/12/85 t4 *ttf 309M69 11/12/85 309M69 11/12/85 309M64 11/12/85 309M65 11/12/85 309""69 11/12/85 41 tom :t C 309T50 11/12/85 31OA75 11/12/8 31OA75 11/12/85 31OA75 11/12/95 31OA75 11/12/85 31 DA75 11/12/85 31OA75 11/12/85 310A75 11/12/85 31OA75 11/12/85 310A75 11/12/85 310A75 11/12/85 AN0UNT 719e50 719.50 9 9 006.74 193.00 193.00 180.00 306.00 9,798.74 7.00 7.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOI ITEM DESCRIPTIOt F i 22.67 71.84 6.40 2.55 3.20 9.60 6.40 14.84 137.20 78.32 MN TEAMST_AS MINN STAT= TREAS MINN STAT= TREAS MINN STAT= TREAS MINN STAT= TREAS MINN STAT= TREAS T J AUTO 'ARTS A T 9 T A T L T A T & T A T 8 T A T 8 T A T T A T 8 T A T 8 T A T L T AT &T UNION DUES PSL LICENSE LICENSE LICENSE LICENSE LICENSE SUPPLIES TELEPHONE TELPHONE TELEPHONE TELPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 4 a i 1985 CITY OF MAPLEW003 E RESISTER VEN002CHECKNO*DATE AMOUNT i t 31OA75 11 /12/85 3.20 A310A"75 11/12/85 90 60 TELEPHONE A T g T31OA7511/12/85 21e50 g31OA7511/12/85 26.58 T310A7511/12185 33.93 A T I TELEPHONE31DA7511/12/85 7.79 F 310A75 11/12/85 23.74 31OA75 11/12/85 3.20 T31OA7511/12/85 19.20 A310A7511/12/85 29.07 TELEPHONE 31OA75 11/12/85 3.20 T TELEPHONE A T31OA7511/12/85 1.81 T31OA7511/12/85 35.46 A31OA7511/12/85 6040 TELEPHONE A T T31OA7511/12/85 3.20 t 310A75 11/12/85 3.20 T31OA7511/12/85 3.20 A31OA7511/12/85 10.80 MAINT CONTR 31OA75 11/12/85 3.20 T 31OA75 11/12/35 8016 T TELEPHONE 609.56 310025 11/12/85 9.74 31 OC25 11/12/85 1 • 525.66 t 19535.40 CANADA LIc E INS INSURANCE CANADA LI=E INS INSURANCE i CHECK RESISTER VEN002 E ITEM DESCRI PTIOti r i A T g T TELEPHONE A T T TELEPHONE A T g T TELEPHONE A T g T TELEPHONE A T T TELEPHONE A T I TELEPHONE A T T TELEPHONE A T T TELEPHONE A T T TELEPHONE A T T TELEPHONE A T L T TELEPHONE A T T TELEPHONE A T T TELEPHONE A T T TELEPHONE A T T TELEPHONE A T T TELEPHONE A T L T TELEPHONE A T T MAINT CONTR A T T TELEPHONE A T T TELEPHONE CANADA LIc E INS INSURANCE CANADA LI=E INS INSURANCE 1985 CITY OF MAPLE W003 CHECK REGISTER CHECK N0.DATE AMOUNT VEND01 x ITEM DESCRIPTION r e 31DM61 11/12/85 69.60 MN MUTUAL INS INSURANCE 310MGI 11/12/85 48.76 MN MUTUAL INS INSURANCE 31OM61 11/12/85 29.00 MN MJTJAL INS INSURANCE 31OM61 11/12/85 39132.36 MN MJTJAL INS INSURANCE. 31OM61 11/12/85 89099.31 MN MJTJAL INS INSURANCE 11 9 379. J3 310Mb9 11/12/85 79372.00 MINN SLAT= TREAS LICENSE 310M59 11/12/85 297.00 MINN STAT= TREAS LICENSE 7 9 669.3 0 310 N15 11/12/85 10997 NELSON R037-RT SUPPLIES 31ON15 11/12/851 8.75 NELSON R03ERT TRAVEL TRAINING 31ON15 11/12/85 21.75 NELSON R03ERT ORAL EXAM 41.47 ; 310N ?0 «11/12/85 459.00 NE SOCCER ASSOC CONTRACT PYM 459.00 311C40 11/12/85 110050 CLERK OF COURT FILING FEES 110.50 311MG9 11/12/85 59653.20 MINN SLAT= TREAS LICENSE 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR M DE SC R PT I O%ITEM I 311 M69 11/12/85 137.0 0 MINN STATE TREAS LICENSE 59790.20 1059757.07 FUND.01 TOTAL GENERAL C 3.20 FUND 90 TOTAL SANITARY SEXIER F 27!794.94 FUND 92 TOTAL PAYROLL. BENEFIT 15.16 FUND 96 TOTAL VEHICLE EQUIP 133*570.37 TOTAL NECESSARY EXPENDITURES SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING f f k v 4 ACCOUNTS, . PAYABLE_FOR NOVEMBER-25,1985 Rage.: 1 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER j NECK N0.DATE AMOUNT VEIi30I ITEM DESCRIPTION t 329048 11/14/85 75.00 i BLOC 3 =V :ORP SUPPLIES 75.0 0 + 329065 11/14/85 275.00 NATL R!C t PA2K ASSN MEMBERSHIP 275.00 f *t :mot 329094 11/14/85 142.57 R.L.GDJLD SUPPLIES 142.57 329097 11/14/85 59.90 A -1 3JSIN =SS MACHINE SUPPLIES 329097 11/14/85 995.00 A -1 3JSIN =SS MACHINE EQUIPMENT 19054*00 t 329105 11/14/85 13.93-MARTIN LU43ER SUPPLIES 329105 11/14/85 63.4 3 MARTI V LU43ER SUPPLIES 49.5 0 329110 11/14/85 77.50 SAN30UI ST SIB3I E PT WAGES 77.50 C F 329126 11/14/85 82050 DON 3KALM%V FIREARMS SUPPLIES 82e60 4 ft *t :t It 329168 11/14/85 27.00 ADVAIIC_D 'AGING SERV LEASE PAGER 27.00 F, 329185 11/14/85 t .JO MCCON _ AlDREY OFFICE SUPPLIES F 0 a 329188 11/14/85 2.101.35 MUNICIPAL CODE SUPPLIES 29101.35 329200 11/14/85 4.72 KELSEr *OlNIE TRAVEL TRAINING 4 . T 2 4 F!I t1 1985 CITY OF MAPLEW003 CHECK -REGISTER CHECK N0.DATE A"OUNT VEIDOI ITEM OESCRIPTIO r z 329202 11/14/85 81038 JOHNSON Mk RY D PT WAGES Si.38 329211 11/14/85 70000 REHN3rRS s4LE REFUND 70000 329232 11/14/85 95010 FLEXI3LE 21PE &TOOL SUPPLIES 95.10 329235 11/14/85 5:25 GI DDLET M%ICIA REFUND 5.25 329279 11/14/85 8.75 BIERM4N MIS REFUND 8.75 329307 11/14/85 72.50 BERGLUVO 3 =TTY PT WAGES 72.50 329314 11/14/85 530.00 EKSLAD 2AIJEE CONTRACT PYM 329314 11/14/85 315.00 EKSLAD PAI JEE CONTRACT PYM 945.00 z 329353 11/14/85 8.32 BIG 4 AJT3 PARTS SUPPLIES B.32 329416 11/14/85 5o90 TOOLEf 4AI JOKY PT WAGES 75.00 329418 11/14/85 75.00 LIPINSII JOYCE PT WAGES 75.00 tt :tt 329421 11/14/85 82.59 WIEGr-RT E_SIE PT WAGES 82.69 NECK RESISTER VE4301 F ITEM DESCRIPTI01 EDUCATION4L BOOKS MDWCHAI GJIBORS PT WAGES WIDH3LM JJ31 SUPAV Wit PT WAGES PT WAGES PODGDISKI 4RM HAAS BETU HAAS T4.rO30RE FRED= 1I :K30N RITA FISCIER L31RAINE MALLET 30_3RES FOSBJR3H 44NE ARBORE DOROTHY ARBU :CL'E J41CK WARN- 4'w`Al3LIN= ARBUkK L!E '. MARLENE PT WAGES PT WAGES PT WAGES PT WAGES PT WAGES PT WAGES PT WAGES PT WAGES PT WAGES PT WAGES PT WAGES 1935 CITY OF NAPLEW003 CHECK ND*DATE A41 OUNT e. 329424 11/14/85 21.65 21.65 329425 11/14/85 75.0 0 75 *00 329428 11/16/85 76.25 76 *25 329429 11/14/85 80006 80.06 329434 11/14/85 77.50 77.5 0 329435 11/14/85 77 * 5O 77 *50 329436 11/14/85 75 *00 75 *00 329439 11/14/85 72.50 72.50 329440 11/14/85 77 *44 77 *44 329447 11/14/85 75 *00 75.00 329448 11/14/85 81 *38 81 *38 329451 11/14/85 72 *50 72 *50 329459 11/14/85 78075 78o75 329460 11/14/85 75.00 75 *00 329461 11/14/85 78 *75 NECK RESISTER VE4301 F ITEM DESCRIPTI01 EDUCATION4L BOOKS MDWCHAI GJIBORS PT WAGES WIDH3LM JJ31 SUPAV Wit PT WAGES PT WAGES PODGDISKI 4RM HAAS BETU HAAS T4.rO30RE FRED= 1I :K30N RITA FISCIER L31RAINE MALLET 30_3RES FOSBJR3H 44NE ARBORE DOROTHY ARBU :CL'E J41CK WARN- 4'w`Al3LIN= ARBUkK L!E '. MARLENE PT WAGES PT WAGES PT WAGES PT WAGES PT WAGES PT WAGES PT WAGES PT WAGES PT WAGES PT WAGES PT WAGES 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD AMOUNT VE.NDOt E ITEM DESCRIPTIONr t HECK N0.DATE 72.50 MILLER. ALICE 3 PT WAGES 72.50 329462 11/14/85 73.75 LEITER BA13ARA PT WAGES t 73.75 * r 78.75 THOM'SDN 24TRICIA PT WAGES 78.75 * 329465 11/14/85 75A0 DITTEL KATHLEEN PT WAGES 75.00 * 329466 11/14/85 82050 SCHNEIDER LORRAINE PT WAGES 82.50 * 72.50 329470 11/14/85 72.5 0 * 85.00 329472 11/14/85 85.00 * 72.50 ORPHA M G_TTY PT WAGES 83.75 ORPHA M G_TTY PT WAGES 156.25 * 329474 11/14/85 85.31 LI8HAIDT MARY PT WAGES 85.31 * 25.73 329479 11/14/85 25.73 * 4.72 3?9481 11/14/85 7.S0 329481 11/14/85 12.52 * 329482 11/14/85 4.25 AVERY LYNN=REFUND 329490 11/14/85 329496 11/14/85 329496 11/14/85 329521 11/14/85 CHECKS REGISTER AMOUNT VE.NDOt E ITEM DESCRIPTION 78. T 5 72.50 MILLER. ALICE 3 PT WAGES 72.50 73.75 LEITER BA13ARA PT WAGES t 73.75 * r 78.75 THOM'SDN 24TRICIA PT WAGES 78.75 * 75A0 DITTEL KATHLEEN PT WAGES 75.00 * 82050 SCHNEIDER LORRAINE PT WAGES 82.50 * 72.50 BIE413vHh U. I3ANAE.PT WAGES 72.5 0 * 85.00 DEHcN 4ILlIED PT WAGES 85.00 * 72.50 ORPHA M G_TTY PT WAGES 83.75 ORPHA M G_TTY PT WAGES 156.25 * 85.31 LI8HAIDT MARY PT WAGES 85.31 * 25.73 D.C.lEY C3 REFUND 25.73 * 4.72 HENSLEY PAT TRAVEL TRAINING 7.S0 HENSL_Y P4T MILEAGE 12.52 * 4.25 AVERY LYNN=REFUND G v CHECK REGISTER WEN00I ITEM DESCRIPTIOi BROA3Y DOIIS PT WAGES CASE PD4EI EAJIM SUPPLIES MPLS STAR L TRIBUNE ADVERTISING LORD FLET :HERS RESTR PROGRAMS AABUC+CL= 14UL PT WAGES STELLA =L)AENCE HAMEANI CK SAINT ST PAJL DISPATCH 6RA30SKY SILL MCDONALD I LARS3N 3I:SEL SERV PT WAGES SUPPLIES ADVERTISING TRAVEL TRAINING PT WAGES SUPPLIES 1985 CITY OF MAPLEW003 CHECK NO.DATE AMOUNT r F 4.25 fit *tf 329551 11/14/85 72.50 72.50 329559 11/14/85 2.26 2.26 323570 11/14/85 60050 60.50 329588 11/14/85 63.59 63.59 ttttt 329641 13/14/85 70000 70.00 art*** 329645 11/14/85 72.50 72050 329649 11/14/85 35.90 35.90 329657 11/14/85 42o00 42.00 329722 11/14/85 40.52 40.52 f #f 329742 11/14/85 75.00 75.00 tttt 329749 11/14/85 276.56 G v CHECK REGISTER WEN00I ITEM DESCRIPTIOi BROA3Y DOIIS PT WAGES CASE PD4EI EAJIM SUPPLIES MPLS STAR L TRIBUNE ADVERTISING LORD FLET :HERS RESTR PROGRAMS AABUC+CL= 14UL PT WAGES STELLA =L)AENCE HAMEANI CK SAINT ST PAJL DISPATCH 6RA30SKY SILL MCDONALD I LARS3N 3I:SEL SERV PT WAGES SUPPLIES ADVERTISING TRAVEL TRAINING PT WAGES SUPPLIES CHECK REI E v 301 ` LARS3N 31 -SEL SERV LARSON OUSEL SERV LARSON 31:SEL SERV e LISTER ITEM DESCRIPTI01 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CARLE JEAl =TT'c TRAVEL TRAINING Sit M )ON R NO PRIGGE LI13A PT WAGES AAA 4LLi CITY VACUUM SUPPLIES TURN3LA3 31ENDA MILEAGE LOTUS SUPPLIES ACE IDS SUPPLIES ACE 4DJ SUPPLIES ACE HOW SUPPLIES A3RA REPAIR MAINT A4ERI-304 SYSTEM CABLE AMERI -34T1 SYSTE4 1935 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD SYSTEM INSTALLATION AMERI-3AT4 SYSTEM COMPUTER MAINT AMERI -DATA CHECK NO.DATE AMOUNT i 329749 11/14/85 88030 329749 11/14/85 307 *49 329749 11/14/85 15* 12- 657 *23 * 329764 11/14/85 4 *72 4.72 * 329801 1 1/14/85 25d 5 l4ttfr! 329868 11/14/85 75000 75o00 329906 11/14/85 b 35 *35 35 * 35 tttt 329908 11/14/85 15 *50 15 *50 tf *mot 329935 11/14/85 150.00 150.00 329AO1 11/14/85 16* *6 329AOI 11/14/85 40 *46 329AO1 11/14/85 65.55 122. * 329AO7 11/14/85 499.12 499.12 * 329A55 11/14/85 49 *49 329A55 11/14/85 102 *00 329A55 11/14/85 600*00 329A55 11/14/85 981.00 329A55 11/14/85 617.81 329A55 11/14/85 102.00 CHECK REI E v 301 ` LARS3N 31 -SEL SERV LARSON OUSEL SERV LARSON 31:SEL SERV e LISTER ITEM DESCRIPTI01 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CARLE JEAl =TT'c TRAVEL TRAINING Sit M )ON R NO PRIGGE LI13A PT WAGES AAA 4LLi CITY VACUUM SUPPLIES TURN3LA3 31ENDA MILEAGE LOTUS SUPPLIES ACE IDS SUPPLIES ACE 4DJ SUPPLIES ACE HOW SUPPLIES A3RA REPAIR MAINT A4ERI-304 SYSTEM CABLE AMERI -34T1 SYSTE4 MAINT CONTR A4ERI-DAT4 SYSTEM INSTALLATION AMERI-3AT4 SYSTEM COMPUTER MAINT AMERI -DATA SYSTEM CONTRACT PYM AMERI -DAT4 SYSTEM MAINT CONTR e- 7 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD "HECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AyOUNT V ENDOX ITEM DESCRIPTION 2 e E r t 2 329A69 11/14/85 149.30 ARNALS AUT3 SERV REPAIR MAINT VEH 329A69 11/14/85 21.75 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR MAINT VEH 329A69 11/14/85 19 075.16 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR MAINT VEH 329A69 11/14/85 19654077 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR MAINT VEH 329A69 11/14/85 200.45 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR MAINT VEH 39101 *43 * 329A85 11/14/85 13.59 AJRELI JS _J.CILLE TRAVEL TRAINING 13 *39 * 329813 11/14/85 19905 *00 BART JA4EI C CONTRACT PYM. 19905 *00 329815 11/14/85 74 *42 GATT =RY TIIE WHSE SUPPLIES T4 *42 329822 11/14/85 78938 B *F*SO3JRICH SUPPLIES 329822 11/14/85 89 *76 S.F *G0O0RICH SUPPLIES 168064 329835 11/14/85 19280.00 BRACK= LOJIS CONTRACT PYM 19280 *00 329B45 11/14/85 26.22 BOARD 0= DATER COMM TILITIES 329845 11/14/85 79 *80 B RJ OF MATER COMM LITiES; 329645 /14! 7.42 BOA Or MATER COMM UT ITIE 329845 1 14 5 2.12 BOAR) i.A COMM UTIL Ti S 329845 11 /85 1 1 *71 BOARD OF TER COMM SUPPL S 329845 11! /85 9 .'! BoAD O ER COMM SUPP S 329645 11 1 85 86 6 BOARS F SAT COMM SUP P IE 329845 1 !14 5 7 B0 : J OF DATER MM SU PLIES 329845 11/14/ 5 1 5* BOAR) OF DATER COMM PPLIES 329845 11/14/85 1 60 * DO BOAR? OF DATER COMM CONTRACT PYM 9291 *02 329855 11/14/85 9 *85 BROWN 24OTO SUPPLIES 9 *35 Pq - e` 1935 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER I C:ECK NO*DATE A4DUNT VcVD01 L P 0ITEMDESCRiTI r i i - I 329865 11/14/85 435089 BSN SUPPLIES 435.89 329C29 11/14/85 53.20 CHUCK3 BAITS CTR SUPPLIES 53.20 329C39 11/14/85 1096 --CCMSTOVE 340DUCTS SUPPLIES 329C39 11/14/85 175.37 CEMSTONE. 210DUCTS SUPPLIES 173:41 t 329C42 11/14/85 77.50 COTTR_LL JOAN PT WAGES 77.50 329C45 11/14/85 22.60 CHIP SDRIN "oS WATER COOLER 22* 60 329C56 11/14/85 23.02 CDLLI13 E_ -CTRIC CONTRACT PYM 329C56 11/14/85 33005 CDLLINS E_= CTRIC SUPPLIES 56 *07 329C58 11/14/85 160 *61 COPY EQUIll"ENT INC SUPPLIES 160.61 # 329C90 11/14/85 5079 COUNTY CAB SUPPLIES 329C90 11/14/85 5.79 COUNTRY C_UB SUPPLIES 329C90 11/14/85 5.79-COUNTRY C_U8 SUPPLIES 329C90 11/14/85 31 *92 COUNTRY C-UB SUPPLIES 37 *71 • 329C94 11/14/85 125.60 CUSTOM FIt=REPAIR MAINT 125.60 * 329035 11/14/85 430.0 0 DALEY 'AT CONTRACT PYM 4 30.0 0 * r 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD HECK REGISTER r CAECK N0.DATE AMOUNT IfEM301 F ITEM DESCRIPTION r 329D40 11/14/85 16500 DEPT OF PJ3LIC SFTY SOFTWARE MAINT 165.0 0 1 329D60 11/14/85 10043 DOHEITr KITHLEtN SUPPLIES 10.43 329070 11/14!85 24.95 DON STR:I:lrR SUNS SUPPLIES 24.95 t *tit 329EO7 11/14/85 3.05 EASTMAV K33AK CO DUPLICATING COST; 329EO7 11/14/85 1.50 EASTMAl K3DAK CO DUPLICATING COST! 329E07 11 /14 /85 4.52 EASTMAN! K33AK CO DUPLICATING COST; 329E07 11/14/85 33.17 EASTMAN K33AK CO DUPLICATING COST! 329E07 11/14/85 34.58 EASTMlkl K33AK CO DUPLICATING COST! 329EO7 11/14/85 4.52 EASTMAN K33AK CO DUPLICATING COST! 329E07 11/14/85 4 EASTMAI K33AK CO DUPLICATING COST! 329EO7 11/14/85 19060 EASTMAI K33AK CO DUPLICATING COST; 150.30 ttt :mot 329E50 11/14/85 77.50 ERICKSDI 24YLLIS PT WAGES 77.50 329FO6 11/14/85 82.50 FASTNER D: LOgi S PT WAGES 82.50 t t :tom* 329GID 11/14/85 41070 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS 329GID 11/14/85 28.80 G A K SERVICES UNIFORMS 329GID 11/14/85 28.80 G A K SERVICES UNIFORMS 329610 11/14/85 28.90 6 & K SERVICES UNIFORMS 329610 11/14/85 20000 G A C SERVICES UNIFORMS 329GID 11/14/85 30.40 G 8 K SERVICES UNIFORMS 329GID 11/14/85 103.06 G 6 K SERil CES UNIFORMS 329610 11/14/85 18000 G A K SERVICES UNIFORMS 329510 11/14/85 30940 6 8 K SER VI CES UNIFORMS 329GIO 11/14/85 27.20 G 9 K SERVICES UNIFORMS 329610 11/14/85 18000 G 8 t SERVICES UNIFORMS 329GID 11/14/85 18600 6 & K SERVICES UNIFORMS 329610 11/14/85 38.50 G 9. C SERVICES SUPPLIES 329GID 11/14/85 38.29 G 9 K SERVICES SUPPLIES 329GID 11/14/85 27.30 G A K SERVICES SUPPLIES i El e, 1935 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD VEND01 F ITEM! DESCRIPTION 18030 6 A K SERiICES CHECK N09 DATE 329910 11/14/85 GEN R4L R-- 6: t *: 29280 * 67 * 329G38 11/14/85 GENERATOR SPECIALTY SUPPLIES 71.50 * 121.45 GENERAL T11E SERV SUPPLIES 121.45 t 329342 11/14/85 GOODY =4R II RE CO SUPPLIES 130 *72 630DY =Ai FIRE CO SUPPLIES 219o88* 329G44 11/14/85 GENU14 P4RTS 329G45 11/14/85 GENUINE PARTS 329645 11/14/85 GENJIy= PARTS SUPPLIES 192 *11 * 329G46 11/14/85 GRAYS Pr -T STORE 329646 11/14/85 329646 11/14/85 H.C.D.FUEL OIL 29 *36 329661 11/14/85 HEJNY R =NT4LS INC SUPPLIES 40 *00 tom * ** 72050 MENDRI ;KS BEA PT WAGES 72 *50 329HO5 11/14/85 INTL CDNF BLDG OFLS BOOK 3.00 77050 KLEBE =04M4 329H24 11/14/85 329H35 11/14/85 329190 11/14/85 329K27 11/14/85 El e, CHECK REGISTER A40UNT VEND01 F ITEM! DESCRIPTION 18030 6 A K SERiICES UNIFORMS 515.25 * 29280 *67 GEN R4L R--SUPPLIES 29280 * 67 * t 71.50 GENERATOR SPECIALTY SUPPLIES 71.50 * 121.45 GENERAL T11E SERV SUPPLIES 121.45 t 89016 GOODY =4R II RE CO SUPPLIES 130 *72 630DY =Ai FIRE CO SUPPLIES 219o88* 3.40 GENU14 P4RTS SUPPLIES 165.76 GENUINE PARTS SUPPLIES 22 *95 GENJIy= PARTS SUPPLIES 192 *11 * 22.30 GRAYS Pr -T STORE SUPPLIES 22.8 0 * 29.36 H.C.D.FUEL OIL 29 *36 40 *00 HEJNY R =NT4LS INC SUPPLIES 40 *00 72050 MENDRI ;KS BEA PT WAGES 72 *50 3 *00 INTL CDNF BLDG OFLS BOOK 3.00 77050 KLEBE =04M4 PT WAGES 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOOJ CHICK REGISTER HECK NO*DATE AMOUNT 11MDOt i ITEM OESCRIPTIO r 77.50 329K55 11/14/85 126 *93 KNOK LURB:R SUPPLIES + 329K55 11/14/85 132 *63 KNOK LUMB =R SUPPLIES ' 259.46 *I 329L23 11/14/85 72.50 LIED-El MA2T LOU PT WAGES 72* 50 329L37 11/14/85 323:00 LENFr—A TR411SM REPAIR MAINT 323 *00 329L47 11/14/85 84.00 LOFGAEN O =LOR =S PT WAGES 84.00 329L90 11/14/85 80000 LUTTREL'L 3MIRLEY PT WAGES 80000 329MO3 11/14/85 81.38 MALE! 411T_PT WAGES 81.38 329MO9 11/14/85 89 *25 MATHEJS E PT WAGES 89 *25 32914 11 11/14/85 124.31 MAC QUEEN _QUIcIMENT SUPPLIES 32Mll 11/14/85 324.73 MAC 0.1 = +_N _QUIIMENT REPAIR MAINT 449.04 * i j 329M14 11/14/85 467 *60 MAPL =W00D REVIEW PUBLISHING J 329114 11/14/85 27.30 MAPLE930D REVIEW SUPPLIES 329Mi4 11/14/85 135.36 MAPLE-9300 REVIEW SUPPLIES 329M14 11/14/85 114016 MAPLEJODD REVIEW PUBLISHING f ' 3291414 1/14/85 27.47 MAPLEWOOD REVIEW SUPPLIES I 771 *89 t *t *t 329M19 11/14/85 1 *65 MERIT :HElROLET REPAIR MAINT U ; 1 *65 * P e; l 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOOJ CHECK REGISTER 4ECK N0.DATE AMOUNT NOOt ITEM DESCRIPTIOf r 329M21 11/14/85 6.95 HAPLE4030 3AKERY SUPPLIES 6.95 323M44 11/14/85 79.95 MINNIL MU=FLERS REPAIR MAINT 329M44 11/14/85 37.95 MI NNI E MU= FLERS REPAIR MA I NT 117.90 329M59 11/14/85 99.25 MINNESOTA 3LUEPRINT SUPPLIES 99o25 323M88 11/14/85 92500 14ID4EST AIIMAL SERV ANIMAL CONTROL 925.00 t 329M97 11/14/85 123.35 MJNICILIT= CO SUPPLIES 329M97 11/14/85 142.92 MlJNICILIT= CO SUPPLIES 266.27 tttftt 323N20 11/14/85 26.24 NEED =LS C3 SUPPLIES 26.24 329N50 11/14/85 30.56 NORTiWrST =RN BELL TELEPHONE 323N50 11/14/85 51.54 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 323N50 11/14/85'31.20 NORTldr- tST:RN BELL TELEPHONE 323N50 11/14/85 3.80 NORTHWESTE ;N BELL TELEPHONE 329N50 11/14/85 1,094.63 NORT4WEST - BELL TELEPHONE 329N50 11/14/85 15.91 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 321N50 11/14/85 56.50 NORTAW_tST_RN BELL TELEPHONE 329N50 11/14/85 34.53 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 329N50 11/14185 54.70 NORT.lWEST =RN BELL TELEPHONE 323N50 11/14/85 66.16 NORTHJEST - IN BELL TELEPHONE 329N50 11/14/85 81.35 NORTHWEST_RN BELL TELEPHONE 329N50 11/14/85 54.57 NORTHWEST ERN BELL TELEPHONE 329NSO 11/14/85 15.26 NORTHWEST =RN BELL TELEPHONE 323N50 11/14/85 15.30 N0RTHWE-ST or. RI9 BELL TELEPHONE 323NSC 11/14/85 2500 NORTlW= :ST =RN BELL TELEPHONE 329N50 11/14/85 1,033.00 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 329N50 11/14/85 290.56 NORTHW -STERN BELL TELEPHONE 329N50 11/14/85 71.50 NORTIWEST =4N BELL TELEPHONE 329N50 11/14/85 13.95 NORTIWESTr-RN BELL TELEPHONE 329N50 11/14/85 74.23 NORTIWEST =RN BELL TELEPHONE 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK ND. r DATE 4 329N50 11/14/85 323N50 11/14/85 329N50 11/14/85 329N50 11/14/85 329N50 11/14/85 323N50 11/14/85 323N50 11/14/85 329N50 11/14/85 329N50 11/14/85 t 3291150 11/14/85 329N50 11/14/85 329N50 11/14/85 329450 11/14/85 329N50 11/14/85 323N50 11/14/85 329N50 11/14/85 NORTHWESTERN 329N95 i 11/14/85 NORTHWESTERN 11015 i NORTiWESTERN 329054 11/14/85 4 12.80 z 329P30 11/14/85 329P3D 11/14/85 c 6000 t 329P40 11/14/85 329P40 11/14/85 329P40 11/14/85 OLSO4 !MAXI NE r 329P58 11/14/85 s Pc"TE133N 3EL 329PST 11/14/85 PETERSON 3EL 2.283.BO 329R04 11/14/85 r PA e 13 HECK RESIST:R AMOUNT VENDOZ 61.38 TELEPHONE ,NORTHWESTERN 51.54 BELL NORTHw SST -rAN 13.95 TELEPHONE NORTH4ESTERN 51.54 BELL NORTHWESTERN 51.54 TELEPHONE NORTHWESTERN 50016 BELL NORT 44 —rST E R N 51.54 TELEPHONE NORTHWEST—ERN 51.54 BELL NORTH4ESTERN 50.33 TELEPHONE NORT.H4ESTERN 28.60 BELL NORT4W= :STERN 13.95 TELEPHONE- NORTHWESTERN 13.95 NORTHWESTERN 16.1.1 NORTHWESTERN 11015 NORTiWESTERN 13.95 NORTAW ESTER Al 12.80 NORT4WESTERN 3 6000 NUTESOM LOVE 6.00 77.50 OLSO4 !MAXI NE 77.5 0 208.80 Pc"TE133N 3EL 29075.00 PETERSON 3EL 2.283.BO 7.35 PHOTOS TO ;0 2.80 PHOTOS TO SO 5.73 PHOTOS TO SO 15.88 42059 POWER 33ACE 42.59 76050 PROF =S SI01 4 L 76.50 27.38 RADIO SHA"R.'4 27.38 ITEM DESCRIPTIO' BELL TELEPHONE , BELL TELEPHONE BELL TELEPHONE BELL TELEPHONE BELL TELEPHONE BELL TELEPHONE BELL TELEPHONE BELL TELEPHONE BELL TELEPHONE BELL TELEPHONE BELL TELEPHONE BELL TELEPHONE BELL TELEPHONE BELL TELEPHONE BELL TELEPHONE BELL TELEPHONE- RNE TRAVEL TRA -INING PT WAvES L CONV CONTRACT PYM L CONV CONTRACT PYM SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES EQUIP SUPPLIES PROCESS AMB RN SUPPLIES 1985 CITY OF HAPLEW003 CHECK REGISTER i CHECK NO.DATE AMOUNT Y N)ot F ITEM DESCRIPTION z r 329R09 11/14/85 63.57 RAMSEY - COJVTY CONTRACT PYIM 329RO9 11/14/85 45.96 RAMSEY COJMTY CONTRACT PYM 329RO9 11/14/85 4088 RAMSEY COJNTY CONTRACT PYM E 329R39 11/14/85 15.00 RICHMS SUPPLIES 15.00 329R49 11/14/85 59.00 ROAD R=SCJ SUPPLIES 329R49 11/14/85 8.76 ROAD RESCJE SUPPLIES 329849 11/14/85 18075 ROAD RESCJE SUPPLIES 3?9R49 11/14/85 48050-ROAD RESCJE SUPPLIES 329R49 11/14/85 23.25 ROAD RESCJE SUPPLIES 61.26 329850 11/14/85 12.75 RONS 3INr ING SU L ESSUPPLIES 12.75 329302 11/14/85 17.90 S 8 3 LOC( SAFE SUPPLIES 17.90 329SO3 11/14/85 52.68 SPS D -FIC- PROS SUPPLIES 329S03 11/14/85 13.52 SPS 0W FICE PROD SUPPLIES 329S03 11/14/85 15.84 SPS DFFIC= PROD SUPPLIES 82.04 329SO5 11/14/85 35.16 S 5 T D FI CE SUPPLIES 35.16 329309 11/14/85 36.50 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES CHEMICAL TOILETS 329SO9 11/14/85 18000 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES CHEMICAL TOILETS 329SO9 11/14/85 26.08-SATELLITE INDUSTRIES CHEMICAL TOILETS 329SO9 11/14/85 73000 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES CHEMICAL TOILETS 329SO9 11/14/85 80.83 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES CHEMICAL TOILETS 329S09 11/14/85 44.33-SATELLITE INDUSTRIES CHEMICAL TOILETS 329SO9 11/14/85 73.00 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES CHEMICAL TOILETS 210.92 t 329S11 11/14/85 62.26 S & S CRA=TS SUPPLIES 329S11 11/14/85 283.04 S i S CAA= TS SUPPLIES AMOUNT 345 *30 24.17 19030 *00 19054 *47 p4 e' 1s CHEC( REGISTER yE 1I ITEM DESCRIPTION E SEARS #9412 SEARS 03412 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 138 *91 SHAW LU48:R SUPPLIES 138.81 * 1185 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1.481 * 16 SHORT = LLI 3T H:. MOR CONTRACT PY M 19 481.16 * CHTCK N0.DATE 66.05 SPECIALITY RADID SUPPLIES 66.05 * 157 *5D ST PAUL1 SJ3UR3AN BUS PROGRAMS 157.50 * 329S30 11/14/85 10000 329S30 11/14/85 10.00 * 17068 SJPERA ME.RI CA FUEL OIL 73 *97 SJPEZAMERICA FUEL OIL 54.34 329S32 11/14/85 145.99 9099 TARGET PROGRAMS 9.79 329S39 11/14/85 19.78 152.5 0 329S55 11/14/85 152.50 * 122.00 tom *t SUPPLIES 122.00 * 329S68 11/14/85 323SS3 11/14/85 329S90 11/14/85 329S90 11/14/85 329S90 11/14/85 329T30 11/14/85 329T30 11/14/85 329T45 11/14/85 329T47 11/14/85 t AMOUNT 345 *30 24.17 19030 *00 19054 *47 p4 e' 1s CHEC( REGISTER yE 1I ITEM DESCRIPTION E SEARS #9412 SEARS 03412 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 138 *91 SHAW LU48:R SUPPLIES 138.81 * 1.481 * 16 SHORT = LLI 3T H:. MOR CONTRACT PY M 19 481.16 * 66.05 SPECIALITY RADID SUPPLIES 66.05 * 157 *5D ST PAUL1 SJ3UR3AN BUS PROGRAMS 157.50 * 10000 STATE 3= 4INN TREAS CONTRACT PYM 10.00 * 17068 SJPERA ME.RI CA FUEL OIL 73 *97 SJPEZAMERICA FUEL OIL 54.34 SJPERAMERICA FUEL OIL 145.99 9099 TARGET PROGRAMS 9.79 TARuT PROGRAMS 19.78 152.5 0 TROMPS 3 N E I TERPRI SES BOOKS 152.50 * 122.00 TEAM L43 CHEMICAL SUPPLIES 122.00 * I g y ^ J I J 1935 CITY OF MAPLEW300 NECK REGISTER YI 47C4 N0.DATE AyOUNT Y =N003 F ITEM DESCRIPTION .I t 329T50 11/14/85 63078 T J AJT3 'ARTS SUPPLIES 329T50 11/14/85 32.03 T J 4UT3 'ARTS SUPPLIES 329T50 11/14/85 19086 T J AUTO 'ARTS SUPPLIES 323T50 11/14/85 10071 T J AUTO 'ARTS SUPPLIES s 329T50 11/14/85 105.74 T J AUTO 'ARTS SUPPLIES 329TSO 11/14/85 22.04 J AUTO 'ARTS SUPPLIES ' 329T50 11/14/85 38.25 T J AUf3 'ARTS SUPPLIES 329T50 11/14/85 7.53 T J AUTO 'ARTS SUPPLIES 304.94 t 329T62 11/14/85 20.94 TOPTcCH SUPPLIES 20.94 1 329T85 11/14/85 478.20 TURN©UI ST PAPER CO SUPPLIES y 478.20 AM 329U50 11/14/85 185.16 UNIFORMS JILINITED UNIFORMS 185.16 tit :t* to 329U75 "11/14/85 250.00 UNIT =I ARTIST COMM PROGRAMS 250.00 329U79 11/14/85 44.95 UNITE-3 STIES UNIFORMS 329U79 11/14/85 44.95 UNITcO STARES UNIFORMS 89.90 329086 11/14/85 16044 UNIVE—RSAL +MEDICAL SUPPLIES 329085 11/14/85 15060 UNIVERSAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES 32.04 329V22 11/14/85 52.00 VASKO RU83IS4 RENOV RUBBISH REMOVAL r 329V22 11/14/85 11000—WASKO RUB3ISH REMOV RUBBISH REMOVAL 329V22 11/14/85 132.00 WASKO RUB3ISH REMOV RUBBISH REMOVAL 323V22 11/14/85 204.90 WASKO RUB3ISH REMOV RUBBISH REMOVAL 377.0 0 329V50 11/14/85 17000 VIRTU= PRINTING PRINTING t 1935 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD t/END02 ITEM DESCRIPTI( 94.25 VIRTUE PRINTING: CHECK N0.DATE r i 329V50 11/14/85 r r SUPPLIES 55.92 329W05 11/14/85 WARN ERS TIDE VALU SUPPLIES 16.38 WARNERS TINE YALU SUPPLIES 14039 WARN =RS TIUE VALU SUPPLIES 28.09 WARNERS TIDE VALU 329W21 11/14/85 WARN =RS TIDE VALU 329421 11/14/85 329421 11/14/85 WERDEI IAt 329421 11/14/85 329W21 11/14/85 WEBS-R- T103 INC SUPPLIES 68.00 WEBER- TR03ETH INC SUPPLIES 168.08 75.36 WESCO 329W45 11/14/85 7058 WRITE 3EA1 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7.58 * 329W50 11/14/85 WILLIAMS )JAME J 329W50 11/14/85 63.08 W W aRAINi =R SUPPLIES 8 *48 W W SRAIN;ER 329WSO 11/14/85 ttf *t* 78019 XEROX :ORD 329W55 11/14/85 XEROX 4'.DUPLICATING 156.38 329 WT4 11/14/85 329W90 11/14/85 329w90 11/14/85 329X30 11/14/85 329X30 11/14/85 r- CHECK. REGISTER AMOUNT t/END02 ITEM DESCRIPTI( 94.25 VIRTUE PRINTING:RUBBISH REMOVAI 111.25 55.92 WAGERS INC SUPPLIES 55.92 15.95 WARN ERS TIDE VALU SUPPLIES 16.38 WARNERS TINE YALU SUPPLIES 14039 WARN =RS TIUE VALU SUPPLIES 28.09 WARNERS TIDE VALU SUPPLIES 12047 WARN =RS TIDE VALU SUPPLIES 87,078 * 5.00 WERDEI IAt PT WAGES 5.00 * 100008 WEBS-R- T103 INC SUPPLIES 68.00 WEBER- TR03ETH INC SUPPLIES 168.08 75.36 WESCO SUPPLIES 75.36 * 7058 WRITE 3EA1 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7.58 * 55.24 WILLIAMS )JAME J TRAVEL TRAINING 55.24 * 63.08 W W aRAINi =R SUPPLIES 8 *48 W W SRAIN;ER SUPPLIES 71.56 78019 XEROX :ORD DUPLICATING 78.19 XEROX 4'.DUPLICATING 156.38 1335 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD NEC( REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT V:y0O1 ITEM DESCRIPTION f Z 329210 11/14/85 14.05 ZAPPA JOS = TRAVEL TRAINING 14.05 r 329Z30 11/14/85 132.60 ZEP I S C) 132060 tuft• 339379065 FU43 01 TOTAL 11615 FUY3 03 TOTAL 19030 *00 FUN)11 TOTAL 45.96 FM 56 TOTAL 19481016 FU4D 65 TOTAL 32.35 FUVO 67 TOTAL 1.760.00 FUM.0 73 TOTAL 31229047 FUNS 90 TOTAL 29427.87 FM 96 TOTAL 439397.61 TOTAL INDICATES ITEMS FIy`ANCE'D BY RECREATIONAL FEES SUPPLIES GENERAL HYDRANT CHARGE PARK DEVELOPMENT 85 -4 RIPLEY AVE 81 -12 HOLLOWAY AV 85 -17 S OUTHL.AWN 8 85 -21 HIGHLAND TC SANITARY SEWER Fii VEHICLE 8 EQUIP F DATE 11/13/85 C I T Y O F M A P L E W 0 1 PRO P R 10 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REP( CHECK 0GR SS NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY 0356.0 02 -9671 BERM LO I S N 7298 7 DIVISION OE CITY MANAGER 7E9s60 03561 10 --4474 JAHN DAVID J 84w55 E 1 -= .SWAN ON, , 4`h 0 LE 804o6 A 4E:. 40 03565 2E -4446 MATHEYS DIVISION 10 CITY HALL MAINT 03570 889.20 V I GNALO DELORES A 770,40 03563 12-0124 DOHE RTY KATHLEEN M 657. c0 DIVISION 22 03564 12-0166 CUDE LARRY J E42. 40 03565 UERnF-R JORN 03571 31 -2198 AURELIUS LUCILLE E 2021a 23 DIVISION 12 Eh RGENCY SERVICES 31 -4816 SELVOG 105 D 205w70 y 035 31 -5815 SCHADT JEANNE 03566 21-1078 FAUST DANIEL F 1688, 40 DIVISION E1 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1688.40 DIVISION 31 CITY CLERK ADMINISTRATION 2664w25 03567 22-0614 HAGEN ARL I N J 1071. 63 0 356 4`h 0 LE I GARE A 4E:. 40 03565 2E -4446 MATHEYS ALANA K 873.OS 03570 22 -7550 V I GNALO DELORES A 770,40 DIVISION 22 ACCOUNTING 31 37. 5'` 03571 31 -2198 AURELIUS LUCILLE E 2021a 23 03572 31 -4816 SELVOG BETTY D 205w70 y 035 31 -5815 SCHADT JEANNE L 437n32 T DIVISION 31 CITY CLERK ADMINISTRATION 2664w25 L -1-71 DATE 11/13/85 PROGRAM P R 10 r C I T Y O F M A P L E W PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REP1 CHECK, GROSS NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY d 03574 33 -0547 KELSEY CONNIE L 415. 13 i 035 33 -4435 VIE LORRAINE S 724.46 1751,20 03576 33 -4994 HENSLEY PATRICIA A 394. c 3 t 03577 33 --6105 CAROE JEANETTE E 870. 00 03 578 33 -8389 GREEN PHYLLIS C 859.0 i NELSON ROBERT D 1528w00 41 -7636 OMATH JOY 0 643, 1..DIVISIO 33 DEPUTY REGISTRAR MART I NSON CAROL 8662. 551w20 IVISIC3N 41 1 i 57 4 —?5 :8 TOT`TE k 4 6w00 i J 03586 4 --0130 ZAPPA JOSEPH A i a 34 03587 42-0251 ST ELEC - l S T 1 '807 '86 46m00 03568 42-0457 SKALMAN DONALD W 1 66 03580 41 -1717 COLLINS KENNETH V 1751,20 03581 41—R I C I E CA ROLE L 631 03582 ; 2356 41 -293 SVE JOANNE M 821.59 03583 41 -3183 NELSON ROBERT D 1528w00 03584 41 -7636 OMATH JOY E 643, 1 03585 41-926 MART I NSON CAROL F 551w20 IVISIC3N 41 1 s k J 03586 4 --0130 ZAPPA JOSEPH A 1401u14 03587 42-0251 ST VERNON T 1 '807 '86 C -03568 42-0457 SKALMAN DONALD W 1 66 03589 42--0990 MORELL I RAYMOND J 1207. 26 03590 42 - 1=:04 STEFFEN SCOTT L 1076w06 0359:42-1388 LEE ROGER W 1 '85'8. 06 03593 42 -1577 BANICK JOHN J 1o11. 98 03594 42 --1660 BOH - L JOHN G 949a53 03595 48. -19 30 CLAUSON DALE K 1252w06 03596 42-2063 MOESCHTE R RICHARD M 13'80. 50 03597 2= T 15"AT N JOHN H 1 . 2. 03598 48- 2231 KORTUS DONALD V 1 X79 4 O 03599 48 -8884 PELTIER WILLIAM F 1378.74 j 03 0'0 SZCZEPANSKI THOMAS 7 m46 S 03601 48 -3243 WELCHLIN CABOT V 765n 1 i r J ` f f F i w DATE 11/13/85 C I T Y O F M A P L E W O PROGRAM P R 10 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REPC CHECK GROSS NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY 03 602 42-3591 LANG RICHARD J 1315a 75 03603 4'2 1 RYA MICHAEL P 1404w38 03604 4_80_ 42-4916 HERBERT MICHAEL J 1268 a 86 0 X605 4` —E 11 3 D REGE R RICHARD C 1418, 5l j 03606 t 42 -74 ESE RGE R_ON JOS A 102m 34 4S6 0 7 7686 MEEHAN, J R 'DAMES E 1 62m 9S 42 -7887 GREEN NORMAN L 1401w14 03609 42-8226 STA GREGORY L 1 ' 22 3 66 08610 42- -8516 HALWEG KEVIN R 1378n74 03611 42-9204 STOCKTON DE R RELL T 1 25 1.84 03 612 42 -3867 BOWMAN RICK A 1150x46 BECKE R RONALD DIVISION 42 POLICE SERVICES JAMES M 3'2686. 60 036 45 - 3333 WILLIAMS DUANE J 1 233. 60 1 bb 03614 43 -0488 HEINZ STEPHEN J 1232. 86 DIVISION 45 0381 43 -0518 NELSON CAROL M 1301m 17 03 6l 44 =1789 GRAS IV M 1 x:76. 4 03617 43 - 2052 THOMALLA DAVID J 1107.07 03 618 43 -2201 YOUNG REN JAMES G 130 03S 13 43 --431 E RA Z SKA Z OFF DALE E 1467a46 03620 43 -6071 VORWE RK ROBERT E 1341.46 03623 46 -7030 03681 43 --773 MELAND R JON A 140 BECKE R RONALD D 1 f'`f, 72 t 3 DIVISION 43 PARAMEDIC SERVICES 1 =:850. 73 t 0362 45 -1878 EMBERTSON JAMES M 130'`. 40 036 45 - 3333 WILLIAMS DUANE J 1 233. 60 DIVISION 45 FIRE PREVENTIO 536,00 JANET 7S r 0 62 '6 46 -03`2 STAHNK E JULIE A r 685. 42 03627 46 -1833 CAHANES ANTHONY G 1414. 17 03623 46 -7030 MARTIN SHAWN M 748m00 J t 3 t J i t DATE 11/13/85 j3, PROGRAM PR10 C I T Y 0 F M A P L E W PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REP( CHECK GROSS NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY 03630 46-7236 FLAUGHER JAYME L 792.16 DIVISION 46 DISPATCHING SERV 520@n23 i ; i 03631 51-0267 BARTA MARIE L 618w41 03632 51-3174 WEBWERTH JUDITH A 618v40 03633 51-6872 HAIDER KENNETH G 2336n25 lei 11117i DIVISION 51 PUBLIC WORKS ADM 3573w06 03634 52-0547 MEYER GERALD W 1006, 24 ZZ! 1 KANE MICHAEL R 7-I 03636 52-1431 LUTZ DAVID p 925u60 03637 52 —1484 REINERT EDWARD A 350m80 03638 52-3473 KLAUSING HENRY F 1024.39 03639 52-4037 HELEY RONALD J 959.36 03640 52-6224 TEVLIN, JR.HARRY J 332m40 03641 52-6254 FREBERG RONALD L 953w60 03642 52-6755 PRETTNER JOSEPH B 1333.61 03643 52-8314 CASS WILLIAM C 1351.63 3z DIVISION 52 STREET. MAINTENANCE 9213u95 03644 53 -1010 ELIAS JAMES G 1105.60 03645 53 -1688 PECK DENNIS L 1105.60 03646 53-2522 PRIEBE WILLIAM 1102w69 0 3E4 7-5 31 --397-0 RHLJRw RRY C 1369s23 03648 53-4671 GESSELE JAMES T 1064.00203364953-6109 GEISSLER WALTER M 1064.60 DIVISION 53 ENGINEERING 6831w92 4 0 54—u-j'775 LOFGREN JOHN R 677u60 0 DIV TON 54 PUBLIC WURKb BLDG- MRINT b/to 3 lot DATE 11/13/85 PROGRAM PR10 C I T Y O F M A P'L E W 0 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REP( f CHECK NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME ROSS PAY 036,51 58 1014 NADEAU EDWARD A 1003.18 h 03652 58 — 1 MUL GEORGE W 9 40 LO I S 03653 58 -1720 NUTESON LAVERNE S 1309.23 A 03654 58-2563 BREHEIM ROGER W X3.70.40 j 03655 58-2582 EDSON DAVID 8 1006m79 03 656 58--3790 ANDERSON ROBERT S 694,w40 03664 62-3411 03657 58-5993 OWEN GERALD-C 1008. o0 UNSOR P 946u48 03 666 62 -4097 YUK E R 0 -1 DIVISION 58 SAN SEWER OPERATION 6940=38 03658 55--1000 MULVANEY DEN M 1052. 8 03659 59 -9760 ACDONAL.D JOHN E 1 046. 40 03660 61-0389 ODEGA RD ROBERT D 1571.6:0 03861 61-1066 B RENNE R LO I S J 784 03 86: 61- =1993 F:fUh'IIE E RA A STS. 20 03663 61 -2618 STAPLES PAUL I NE 1 '233. 23 DIVISION 61 COMM SERVICES ADM I N 3904w43 03664 62-3411 GUSINDA MELVIN J 126 08685 E.. — 15 UNSOR P 946u48 03 666 62 -4097 YUK E R WALTER A 81.00 03667 .62 -4121 HELEY ROLAND B 372.00 0,668 - _____ 4577T- -0: 00 03669 62 --4949 SA R RACK GUST B 400a00 03670 62-5506 MA RUSKA MARK A 969s X3671 ` '`- T RE-14 03672 62 -8182 GERMAIN DAVID A 972.00 03673 62- -5784 HUNTER TONY 84.00 DIVISION 62 ' PARK MAINTENANCE 6415u90 f 03674 ____63 1 i i S t tJ i I t { DATE 11/13/85 PROGRAM PR 10 C I T Y O F M A P L E W PAY ROLL CHECK REGISTER REP CHECK GROSS NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY I 03675 63 - 0342 SETTLES GERALD 60000 6_ - 62'0675 3628 GRA MICHAEL J 8E. 50 0. 67' 63:-48 46 r WARD ROY G 37 ..c0 03678 63-5547 ORTH K I MBERLY A 32m50 0 63 - 6422 TAUBMAN DOUGLAS J 568.43 680 63 -81 5 3T 2 55. 1 i i D I V I S I ON 63 RECREATION PROSRAMS 1876013 03681 64 -0 508 GREW JANET M 808880 03682 64--2 163 SOUTTE R CHRISTI 4i4. 040 HOR-SNELL JUDITH UrVr S Gb 40 0, X684 71 -0551 OLSON GEOFFREY W 1552. 00 0368 71 -8553 CH JUDY M 800400 DIVISION 71 COMM DEVELOPMENT ADMIN 352 00 aS86 7` =7178 EKSTRAND THOMAS 6 972 03687 72-8505 JOHNSON RANDALL L 988m90 7. DIVISION 72 PLANNING 1961810 t 03688 73 --0677 OST ROM MA RJO R I E 1281 DIVISION 73 BUILDING INSPECTIONS 1281.60 03685 74 -0776 WENGER ROBERT J 1064.00 03650 74 -5 223 G I RA RD LAWRENCE M 15 5. 0O 3 t DIVISION 74 HEALTH INSPECTIONS 1 'x.15. 00 r FUND NOT ON FILE 121585.6E GRAND TOTALS 1 E 1585. 6,2 r.w. zoo MEMORANDUM ration by Cou ncii : Endorsed T0: City-Manager Modified.,., FROM: Assistant City Engineer Rejected,... SUBJECT: Ripley Avenue Water Main--Project 85 -4 Date irwiw.rsawNrruDATE: November 18, 1985 The engine department and the contractor for the above -named project have reviewed the project and have certified it to be sub— stantially complete. A l i s t of m - items to be corrected has been submitted to the contractor and'has yet to be completed. Therefore, the contractor has requested a reduction in the retai -ned amount of 2 %. We recommend that the council adopt the attached resolution authorizing reducti of the retainage to 2 %. jw Attachment zi MEMORANDUM TO: Acting City Manager FROM: Public Works Coordinator SUBJECT: Change Order -- Project 85 -9 -- Renovation of Lift Stations 6 and 8 DATE November 15, 1985 The bid of Orr Construction Co., Inc. was accepted in the amount of 163,500.00 for the above referenced project. Change Order 1 proposes several changes to the contract as specified. A change in the external power supply connector used by maintenance personnel during power outages will prevent connection of a 440 -volt supply from the portable generator to a 220 -volt lift station, and will enhance the safety aspects of the two lift stations : ADD $5 , 819.55 Elimination of the requirement to remove the existing top of Lift Station 6 and placing a new slab on top of the present slab: DEDUCT $4 , 000.00 Use of Hydromatic brand pumps in lieu of using Flyght pumps: DEDUCT $5 , 000.00 Summary. Contract as Bid $163,5OOoOO Net Change -- Change order 1 -- Deduct - 3,180.45 New Contract Amount 160,319955 Acceptance of Change Order 1 is recommended. lotion b Counci-1 Endorse Modified...,---,- MEMORANDUM Rej ected,-,... Date,......... TO: Actin Mana Haider FROM: Cit Clerk RE- I. R. B 0 - Edina Realt DATE: November 19, 1985 Edina Realt is re approval of a $1,500,000.00 Industrial Revenue Note for ac of land, construction of a 21,600 s foot office buildin on the east side of White Bear Avenue between L and Beam Avenue. The previousl had approval of an I.R.B. but withdrew that re The filin fee has been paid. e APPLICATION/AGREEMENT FOR TAX EXEMPT MORTGAGE REVENUE NQTE FINANCING . This Agreement is hereby entered into between the City of Maplewood Minnesota, hereinafter cal the "City" and c 4_ s C hereinafter called the "appl The applicant is requesting financing for a deve 1 opment project and des i res that the City issue notes according to the terms of the Municipal Industrial Development Act of 1967 as amended., In order for the app.1 i cat ion to be considered by the City, the applicant hereby agrees to pay all costs i nvo l ved , i n the legal and fiscal review of the proposed project an..d a 1 costs involved in the issuance of said notes to finance the project it - is further agreed and understood that the City reserves the right to deny any application for fi in any stage of :the proceedings prior to adopting the resolution authorizing the issuance of notes 1. APPLICANT: a. Busine j 1essName b. Business Address - 97- /' 4. °. c. Business Form (corporation, Hers p so proprietorship , , etc. i %•'..c. Authorized Representat e. Te l e h one - 2 NAME CSC OF MAJORITY STOCKHOLDERS, OFFICERS & DIRECTORS, PARTNERS, PRINCIPALS a°,.__ bo C, do e. 3. INCLUDE A PROPERTY LINE MAP SHOWING EXACT LOCATION OF PROP RTY., NAMES of ADJACENT STREETS, AND DIMENSIONS OF PROPERTY. 4. NATURE OF BUSINESS 536X - II Extract of Minutes of a Meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota Pursuant to due - call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall in said City on Monday, the 25th day of November, 1985, at 7:10 P . M . The following members were present: and the following were absent: Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT TO THE COMMISSIONER OF ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and after full discussion thereof and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly, passed and adopted. RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT PURSUANT TO. THE MINNESOTA MUNICI PAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT TO THE COMMISSIONER OF ENERGY - AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT WHEREAS, a) On October 28, 1985, this City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City ") , adopted a preliminary resolution (the "Earlier Preliminary Resolution") with respect to a Project (as described therein) proposed by a Minnesota general partnership to be formed with Ron Peltier, Larry Davis and Richard Olson as the general partners (the Company ") , in the context of notifying the. Commissioner of Energy and Economic Development Authority (the "Commissioner" ) of the City's intent to issue its commercial development revenue bonds for this Project; b) The Earlier Preliminary Resolution set forth the purposes of the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (the "Act ") and the manner in which the Project satisfies and furthers such purposes; c) The Company has proposed that the City assist in financing such Project through the issuance of a Revenue Bond or Bonds or a Revenue Note or Notes (hereinafter referred to in this resolution as "Revenue Bonds ") pursuant to the Act; d) The Company is currently engaged in the business of real estate development and the Project to be financed by the Revenue Bonds is an approximately 21,000 square foot office building to be located on the East side of White Bear Avenue between Lydia Avenue and Beam Avenue directly North of the Maplewood East Shopping Center in the City and consists of the acquisition of land and the construction of buildings and improvements thereon and the installation of equipment therein, all to be constructed pursuant to the Company's specifications and to be initially owned and operated by the Company to be leased to various parties (the "Project ") , and will result in the employment of additional persons to work within the new facilities; e) The City has been advised by representa- tives of the Company that conventional, commercial financing to pay the. capital cost of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs. of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the Project would be signi- ficantly reduced, and the Company has also advised this Council that the Project would not be. undertaken but for the availability of industrial development bond financing f) Pursuant to a resolution of the City Council adopted on October 28, 1985, a public hearing on the Project was held on November 25, 1985, after notice was published and materials made . avai.lable for public inspection at the City Hall, all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b, at which public hearing all those appearing who desired to speak were heard and written comments were accepted and g) Upon information and belief, no public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Project nor will any public of f ficial either directly or indirectly benefit financially from the Project : NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows:, 1. This Council hereby finds that no information presented at the hearing or since the adoption of the Earlier Preliminary Resolution has caused it to reject the Project or doubt the findings made in the Earlier Preliminary Resolution. The findings in the Earlier Preliminary Resolution, and. the preliminary approvals granted therein, are ratified and confirmed in full* 2. The Council hereby again gives preliminary approval to the proposal of the Company that the City undertake the Project pursuant to the Act and pursuant to a revenue agreement between the City and Company containing such terms and conditions (with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary) as may be necessary to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal of and interest on the Revenue Bonds in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $1,500,000 to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the acquisition,. construction and equipping of the Project. Said revenue agreement may also provide for the entire interest of the Company therein to be mortgaged to the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds. The City hereby again undertakes preliminarily to issue its Revenue Bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions. 3. On the basis of information available to this Council it appears, and the Council hereby finds, that the Project constitutes properties, real and personal, used or useful in connection with one or more revenue producing enterprises engaged in any business within the meaning of Subdivision la of Section 474-02 of the Act; that the Project furthers the purposes stated in Section 474.01 of the Act that the Project would not be undertaken but for the availability of industrial development bond financing under the Act and the willingness of the City to furnish such financing; and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the development of economically sound industry and commerce, to assist in the prevention of the emergence of blighted and marginal land, to help prevent chronic unemployment, to help the City retain and improve the tax base and to provide the range of service and employment opportunities required by the population, to help prevent the movement of talented and educated persons out of the state and to areas within the State where their services may not be as effectively used, to promote more intensive development and use of land within the City, and eventually to increase the tax base of the community* 4. The Project is again hereby given preliminary approval by the City, again subject to the approval of. the Project by the Commissioner or such other state officer having authority to grant approval, and again further subject to final approval by this Council, the Company, and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the ultimate details of the financing . of the Project. 5. In accordance with Subdivision 7a of Section 474.01 of the Act, the Mayor or the Clerk of the City is hereby authorized and directed to submit the proposal for the Project to the Commissioner requesting his approval, and other officers., employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide the Commissioner with such preliminary information as he may require. 6. The Company has agreed and it is again hereby determined that any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project, whether or not the Project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by the Commissioner, will be paid by the Company* 7. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, is again authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Project, to consult with - the City Attorney, the Company and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms and provisions of the Revenue Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary documents, and to submit such documents to the Council for final approval. 8.. Nothing in this resolution or in the documents pre - pared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or funds of the City except the revenue. and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof , nor shall the City be subject. to any liability thereon. The holder of the Revenue Bonds shall never have the right to compel any exercise of. the taxing power of the City to pay the outstanding principal of the Revenue Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City. The Revenue Bonds shall recite in substance that the Revenue Bonds, including interest thereon, are payable solely from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. 9. In anticipation of the approval by the Commissioner and the issuance of the Revenue Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Project, and in anticipation that the City will procure and devote to the Revenue Bonds an adequate allocation of authority to issue private activity bonds (which allocation is not made hereby) , and in order that completion of the Project will not be unduly delayed when approved, the Company is again hereby authorized to make such expenditures and advances toward payment of that portion of the costs of the Project to be financed from the .proceeds of the Revenue Bonds as the Company considers necessary, including the use of interim, short -term financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds if and when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the City. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this 25th day of November, 1985, Mayor Attest: Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my off ice, and that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City duly called and held on the date therein indicated, - insofar as such minutes relate to a resolution giving preliminary approval to a commercial facilities development project. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this day of November, 1985* Clerk SEAL) Action b Council: MEMORANDUM Endorsed. Modified, Rejected. TO: Actin Mana Haider FROM: Cit Clerk RE: I.R.B. - C and White Bear Avenue Associates DATE: November 19, 1985 Gerald Mo C and White Bear Avenue Associates, is re approval of a $900,000.00 Industrial Revenue Note to construct a 21,000 s foot retail shoppin center to be located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Count Road C and White Bear Avenue. The filin fee has been paid.. 536X - II Extract of Minutes of a Meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota Pursuant to due call.and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, was duly held.at the City Hall in said City on Monday, the 25th day of November, . 19 8 5 , at 7:20 P . M The following members were present: and the following were absent: Member introduced the following resolution.and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT TO THE COMMISSIONER OF ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and after full discussion thereof and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof. and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT PURSUANT-TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT TO THE COMMISSIONER OF ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT WHEREAS, a) On October 28 1985, this City . Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City "), adopted a preliminary resolution (the "Earlier Preliminary Resolution") with respect to a Project (as described therein) proposed by C and White Bear Avenue Associates, a . Minnesota general partnership to be formed with Gerald C, Mogren, as a general partner (the "Company ") , in the context of notifying the Commissioner of Energy and Economic Development Authority (the Commissioner ") of the City's intent to issue its commercial development revenue bonds for this Project; b) The Earlier Preliminary Resolution set forth the purposes of the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (the "Act ") and the manner in which the Project satisfies and furthers such purposes; c) The Company has proposed that the City assist in financing such Project through the issuance of a. Revenue Bond or Bonds or a Revenue Note or Notes (hereinafter referred to in this resolution as "Revenue Bonds ") pursuant to the Act; d) The Company is currently engaged in the business of real estate development; and the Project to be financed by the Revenue Bonds is an approximately 21,000 square foot retail shopping center to be located at the northwest corner of the intersection of County Road C and White Bear Avenue in the City and consists of the acquisition of land and the construction of buildings and improvements thereon and the installation of equipment therein, all to be constructed pursuant to the Company's specifications and to be initially owned and operated by the Company to be leased to various parties (the "Project ") , and will result in the employment of additional persons to work within the new facilities; e) The City has been advised by representa- tives of the Company that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital cost of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the Project would be signi- ficantly reduced, and the Company has also advised this Council that the Project would-not be undertaken but for the availability of industrial development bond financing; f) Pursuant to a resolution of the City Council adopted on October 28, 1985, a public hearing on the Project was held on November 25, 1985 , after notice was published and materials made available for public inspection at the City Hall, all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b, at which public hearing all those appearing who desired to speak were heard and written comments were accepted; and g) Upon information and belief, no public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest. in the Project nor will any public official either directly or .indirectly benefit financially from the Project: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 10 This Council hereby finds that no information presented at the hearing or since the adoption of the Earlier Preliminary Resolution has caused it to reject the Project or doubt the findings made in the Earlier Preliminary Resolution. The findings in the Earlier Preliminary Resolution, and the preliminary approvals granted therein, are ratified and confirmed in full. 2. The Council hereby again gives preliminary approval to the proposal of the company that the City undertake the Project pursuant to the Act and pursuant to a revenue agreement between the City and Company containing such terms and conditions (with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary) as may be necessary to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal of and interest on the Revenue Bonds in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $900,000 to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project. Said revenue agreement may also provide for the. entire interest of the Company therein to be mortgaged to the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds. The City hereby again undertakes preliminarily to issue its Revenue Bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions. 3. On the basis of information available to this Council it appears, and the Council hereby finds, that the Project constitutes properties, real and personal, used or useful in connection with one or more revenue producing enterprises engaged in any business within the meaning of Subdivision la of Section 474.02 of the Act; that the Project furthers the purposes stated in Section 474.01 of the Act; that the Project would not be undertaken but for the availability of industrial development bond financing under the Act and the willingness of the City to furnish such financing; and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the development of economically sound industry and commerce, to assist in the prevention of the emergence of blighted and marginal land, to help prevent chronic unemployment, to help the City retain and improve the tax base and to provide the range of service and employment opportunities required by the population, to help prevent the movement of talented and educated persons out of the state and to areas within the State where their services may not be as effectively used, to promote more intensive development and use of land within the City, and eventually to increase the tax base of the community. 4. The Project is again hereby given preliminary approval by the City, again subject to the approval of the Project by the Commissioner or such other state officer having authority to grant approval, and again further subject to final approval by this Council, the Company, and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as. to the ultimate details of the financing of the Project. 5. In accordance with Subdivision 7a of Section 474.01 of the Act, the Mayor or the Clerk of the City is hereby authorized and directed to submit the proposal for the Project to the Commissioner requesting his approval, and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide the Commissioner with such preliminary information as he may require. 6. The . Company has agreed and it is again hereby . determined that any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project, whether or not the Project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by the Commissioner, will be paid by the Company* 7. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, is again authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Project, to consult with the City Attorney, the Company and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms and provisions of the Revenue Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary documents, and to submit such documents to the Council for final approval. 8. Nothing in this resolution or in the documents pre pared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose . The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or funds of the City except the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall. the City be subject to any liability thereon. The holder of the Revenue Bonds shall never have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the outstanding principal of the Revenue Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any.. property of the City. The Revenue Bonds shall recite in substance that the Revenue Bonds, including interest thereon, are payable solely from - the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning . of any constitutional or statutory limitation. 9 . In anticipation of the approval by the Commissioner and the issuance of the Revenue Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Project, and in anticipation that the City will procure and. devote to the Revenue Bonds an adequate allocation of authority to issue private activity bonds (which allocation is not made hereby) , and in order that completion of the Project will not be unduly delayed when approved, the Company is again hereby authorized to make such expenditures and advances, toward payment of that portion of the costs of the Project to be financed from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds as the Company considers necessary, including the use of interim, short -term financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds if and when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the City. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this 25th day of November, 1985. Mayor Attest: Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with. the original thereof on f i le in my office, and that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to a resolution giving preliminary approval to a commercial facilities development project. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this day of November, 1985.. Clerk SEAL) 4 t TO: ' FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:. OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: MEMORANDUM City Manager Thomas tks.trand --- Associate Planner S ign' . Setback Variance ' 2623 White Bear Avenue Kenneth R. .Gamboni' by Kenneth R. Gamboni' Kenneth's on White Bear Endorsed- October 17 , 19 Modified Re j ected.." SUMMARY Date Request Approval of a 7.5 foot side yard setback variance for a freestandingsign. Code requires a ten foot setback and the proposed setback is 2.5 feet. Proposal The proposed sign would be mounted on two poles and would measure four by five feet. The sign would stand twelve feet tall. Comments State statute requires that to approve a variance it must be found that: 1: Strict enforcement of the code would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property. 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The applicant could meet code if he placed his sign far enough back on his property to meet a ten foot side yard setback (see page 6 ) , or if the sign was placed in the parking lot. Neither option is a variable solution. The first would place the sign too far out of view and the s g second would cause trafficlc flow problems on site, Recommendation Adoption of the resolution on page 8 approving a side yard setback variance of 7.5 feet for a pylon sign at 2623 White Bear Avenue on the basis that: 1. Undue hardship would be caused the applicant if code was met since there is no other feasible location for the sign without conflicting with the traffic flow or hindering the sign's visibility. 2. The spirit and intent of the ordinance would be met since there are no adjacent pylon signs on the neighboring lot that would crowd the proposed sign. BACKGROUND Site Description ' 1: Lot size: 16,988 square feet, ° ' 20 Existing use: Kenneth's on White Bear Hairstyling Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Spencer Opt i ca 1, Vogel's Sports and Health and Auto Ready Southerly: two single dwellings and two office buildings. Westerly: an old shack and undeveloped commercial. property Easterly: White Bear Avenue and two single dwellings on commerciallyy zoned property. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 1. Land use plan designation: LSC, limited service commercial center 20 Zoning: BC, business commercial 3. Ordinance requirements: a. Section 36 -272 (b) (2) - -A freestanding sign may be located in a required yard, provided that such sign is not closer than ten feet to any adjoining lot, b. Section 36 -272 (c) - -A freestanding sign shall not project over public property. 4. Statutory requirements: Section 367.10, Subdivision 6 (2)-- state law requires that the following findings be made before a variance can be granted: a. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. b. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance, Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put. to a reasonable - - use- - ---- - i -f - - - s -ed- - u- n-d-e -r-- - - - - - -c o n d -it -i o -n s- a- 11-o -wed- - - b- y - - - - h -e- - - -o- f f i c- i - -a - -1 - - controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will. not alter the essential character of the locality. 0 3c Attachments , 10 Location Map. 29 Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Applicant's letter dated-10 -8 -85 50 Resolution 3 i y W iN AV W W J V OPE Q AV 36 j0Z . 3Rf 1 LOCATION MAP 4 Attachment one Q Q- N i. 'L • ' M • w. , tip. .........., AUTO READ ARRY' S L I V g It P BA t .....+..sue ti' k d 1 • ..R.•.`•r .....ti .: ' ''' a O .t "K O Windsor t 25 I , , c' •I Landscapingg 13 o a n ' d 2 6' 4 AlZIM All N 1 ! Y .' •I F ILto G ' 1 r 1 ArC W... ... ca.c A 3 a c i i 1 t 3 • . F , 1 . ,. . 1 O t0 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Q 5 Attachment two 26097. v SITE PLAN fi o ++ =, -kmon+ +k 4 N i 26097. v SITE PLAN fi o ++ =, -kmon+ +k 4 N KENNETH'S ON WHITE BEAR 2623 White Bear Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 October 8, 1985 The City of Maplewood 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Gentlemen: Due to the expansion of White Bear Avenue, my ability to compete for new business in this area has been greatlyaffected. A few months ago, when the construction came through, the City had to dispose of my business sign. Since that time I have been operating without any sign at all and feel that I have lost the ability to attract any new business in this area. At the present time, I would like to request that you please review the enclosed map of the'lot in question and grant me permission to put up the sign in the loca- tion marked in red on the map enclosed. I chose this side of the lot because it does not take away any of m valuable parking space and will not interfere with any of the signs currently there from other businesses in the area. I like the Maplewood location and I am looking forward to a long and prosperous business relationship. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, KENNE H'S WHITE BEAR L Ke Gamboni Owner KG:jb Encl. 7 Attachment four Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting ofggtheCityCounciloftheCityofMaplewood, Minnesota" was duly called and held in the council chambers . in said city on the day of , 1985 at 7 p.m. , The following . members ,were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Kenneth R. Gambon i applied for -a variance for, the following- described property: Unplatted lands, the South 80 feet of the North 305 feet of that part of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, lying westerly of the West line of White Bear Avenue as described in document 2202969inSection11, T. N29 R.N22. This property is also known as 2623 White Bear Avenue,Maplewood; WHEREAS, Section' 36 -272 (b) (2) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires a ten foot side and setback minimum forY a freestanding sign; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a 2 1/2 foot setback,requiring a variance of 7 1/2 feet; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on October 8, 1985. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Community DesigniYgReviewBoardonOctober22, 1985. The board recommended to the citycouncilthatsaidvariancebe . 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on to consider this variance. Notice thereof was P ublished and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendat ions of the city staff and board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. Undue hardship would be caused the applicant if code was met since there is no other feasible location for the sign without conflicting with traffic flow or hindering the sign's visibility, Y 8 Attachment five 20 The spirit and intent of the ordinance would be met since there are , no adjacent . pylon signs on the neighboring lot that would crowd the proposed sign. Adopted this. day of . 19.85 ' Seconded by Ayes-- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY-OF RAMS EY ) S S . CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointedYqppointedclerkofthecityof* Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that Ihavecarefullycomparedthe y Y Y P e attached and foregoing extract ofminutesofaregularmeetingoftheCityofMaplewood, held of P • on theday , 1985, with the original on file in my office, andthesameisafull, true and complete transcript therefrom 'P insofar as the same relates to this variance: Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate sealea1 o f thecity_ this day of 1985. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota D 1 MINUTES THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY'DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1380 FROSTAV,ENUE, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA TUESDAY, OCTOBER 22,' 1985, 7 P. M. 4 ~1 , • , _ _ I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Moe called the meetin to r Ngoat7p.m, II. ROLL CALL Donald Moe Present (Chairman)Tom Deans Absent George Rossbach PresentBobPetersonPresentFranJukerAbsentJimKochsiekPresent. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES IV, APPROVAL OF AGENDA Board Member Rossbach movedppoval of the agenda as submitted. Board Member Peterson seconded __Ayes all , V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS VI. DESIGN REVIEW A. Sign Setback Variance -- Kenneth's o 'n White Bear Kenneth Gamboni was present at the meeting n •g d indicated Gated he had nothingtoaddtothestaffmemo, Chairman Moe asked . i f there was •anyone. p-r sent who "w. shed to..comment ton theproposal No comments received. Board Member Rossbach moved the board recommenddadoption of the resolutionapprovingasideyardsetbackvarianceof7.5 feet for a 'Pylon signgnat2623WhiteBearAvenue, on the basis that: 1 Undue hardship would be caused the applicant if code was met since thereisnootherfeasible1ocationforthesignwithoutconfl •1 cti ng with the traf f i cfloworhinderingthesignvisibility, ff 2. The spirit and intent of the ordinance would be met since there are no, adjacent,,pylon signs on the neighboring lot than would crowd the proposed' sign. Board Member Peterson. seconded Ayes - - al 1 B,: Plan Review -- Northwestern Bell E ui ment Buildin s Bob Dokken ". repres.enti ng Northwestern Bell said the building' is to boost the capacities..: of the cabal es connecting the area with the central office. He reviewed the proposed sites with the board. The board indicated they felt the brick exterior was more pleasing aesthetically. The board questioned if there would be merit in asking the applicant to return with the actual plans prior to building permit issuance. Chairman Moe asked.if there was anyone present who wished to comment on the proposal. No comments received. Board Member Rossbach moved the board approve the three 16' by 17 foot brick exterior telephone equipment buildings as proposed, subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of conditional use .permits from the city council. 2. Approval of plans by the community design review board does not constitute approval of a building permit. 3. The driveways and turnarounds shall be bituminous. 4. An erosion control plan, acceptable to the city engineer,•shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits for erosion control during construction. 5. If any adjacent property is disturbed or property irons removed due to construction of these sites, those properties shall be restored and irons replaced by the applicant. 6. Grading and drainage plans shall be subject to the city engineer's approval. 7. Each site shall be sodded to a l i n e five feet behind the building, 8. There shall be two six —foot tall evergreen trees planted within the front 15 foot. setback of each site. 9. :All requi red landscape areas shall be continually and properl y maintained. 10. All required plant materials that die shall be replaced by the owner within one year. 11. The applicant shall provide a monetary guarantee, in a form acceptable to staff, in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of any site improvements that are not completed by occupancy. Ao :Lon by Council e Endorsed ModifiMEMORANDUM od..., TO: City .Manager GwAmm . FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson SUBJECT: Tax- Exempt Financing -- Multiple Dwelling and Housing Bond Plan Amendment APPLICANT: Smith Investment Properties LOCATION: Former Harmony School Site . PROJECT: Harmony Seniors' Residences DATE: November 5, 1985 SUMMARY Request 10 Preliminary approval of a 6.5 million tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond program to construct a 116 -unit senior housing complex. 2. Amend the city's housing bond plan to include this financing program. JL Refer to the site plan on page 8. 2. The unit mi.x and proposed monthly rents would be: a. The 52 -unit building would consist of all one - bedroom units Two floor plans would be available. The 624 square foot units would rent for about $470 /month and the 840 square foot units would rent for about $600/month. This residence would be designed for seniors, ages 65 and up. b. The 64 -unit building would consist of 16 one- and 48 two - bedroom units. The one- bedroom units would rent for about 500 /month and the two - bedroom units for about $615 /month. This residence would be designed for seniors, age 55 to 65. 3. Construction of both residences is proposed for 1986. OccupancyPyisplannedforlate1986orearly1987. 4. The city's full faith and credit would not back these bonds, This proposal is consistent with the requirements for approval of tax - exempt financing. Recommendation Approval of the resolution on page 20 to: 1. Grant preliminary approval of $6.5 million in tax- exempt mortgage revenue financing for the 116 -unit Harmony Seniors' Residences development, subject to construction beginning within one year. Approval is on the basis that a. The development will not have a negative effect 'on the vacancy rates of existing Maplewood seniors' residences. . b. There is reasonable assurance that twenty percent of the units will be occupied ,by low -to- moderate income persons until the bonds are retired. 2. Amend the housing bond plan to include a $6.5 million tax-exemptp financing program for the Harmony Seniors' Residences project. 2 BACKGROUND Site Description - Area: 895 acres Existing land user Former Harmony School site and associated athletic facilities Past- Acct- i n 1- 14 -85: Council granted preliminary approval of $5.8 million tax - exempt financing for up to 100 units for the Hazel Ridge elderly housing development proposed by Health Resources, Inc. at 2696 Hazelwood Street. Request for final approval is pending. 8 - 2 -85: Council approved a land use plan amendment from OS, open space and SP , school for this proposal, 10- 22 -85: The Community Design Review Board conditional) approved the siteyPPe and building plans. 110 Land Use Plan designation: RH, residential high density and RM, residential medium density 20. Existing zoning: F, farm residence 3. Proposed zoning: planned unit development 4. Density requirements would be met. 5. Housing: a. The following requirements have been adopted by council for approval of tax - exempt mortgage revenue financing for multiple dwellings: 1) The development shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan. 2) The development will not have a negative impact on the vacancy rates of existing multiple dwellings in the city. 3) There is reasonable assurance that the development will be able to comply with the 20 percent low -to- moderate income requirement over the life of the bond issue, A 4) The bond indenture agreement shall require: a) The developer to annually certify - to - the - c i t Y , on - the anniversary. date of the bonds, .comp'l i ange with . the federal low -to- moderate income requirement. b) The program trustee, as approved by the city council, shall inform. the city of any noncompliance trends, 5) Payment of an annual program participation fee. The formula is-established at the time of final approval . ) b. Federal law regarding the issuance of tax - exempt mortgage revenue bonds for multiple - family housing requires at least 20 percent of the units to be occupied by low -to- moderate income persons until the bonds are retired. Once a person or famil isY income-qualified, their unit counts toward the twenty percent requirement as long as they reside in the unit even though their income may rise above the ceiling. c. Low -to- moderate income is def ined as an annual adjusted household income of 80 percent or less of the average annual income in the Twin City area. The 80 percent ceiling is $26,2409 Gross income is reduced by $750 per adult and $500 per child to calculate adjusted annual income.) Beginning January 1, 1986, this income ceiling will be based upon the number of persons in a household. No final decision has been reached on what the ceilings will be. Mr. Stout states that these proposed changes will have little or no effect on senior housing projects (page 19) . d. Housing bond plan amendment: Council's adoption of theP housing bond plan in October 1982 authorized the use of tax- exempt financing for multiple dwellings. This plan, however, did not include specified development programs: As a result, each time a development is approved for this financing, council must amend the housing bond plan. The amendment must be reviewed by the Metropolitan Council before the developer's request for the* tax exempt financing can be submitted to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for approval. e. According to the market opinion on page 9 that was prepared by Gary Stout of Public - Private Ventures, Maplewood could absorb 156 new senior rental housing units for occupancy in 1986 and up to 43.5 units each year thereafter through 1990, without causing a vacancy problem for existing seniors' residences, f . This 116 -unit development, together with the 75 -unit Hazel Ridge proposal, would account for 191 of the 193 units ( Item e above) that could be absorbed in 1986. A g. The rents, would not be subsidized for units in either residence, thee- ef-ore, Mr. Stout-states that this development will not compete with Concordia Arms. or Archer Heights f-or tenants. The units designed principally. for the elderly-(52-unit residence) would also probably not compete directly with the proposed Hazel Ridge residence because, the health services to be offered by Hazel Ridge would be more extensive. Hazel Ridge's structure would also offer more amenities. Procedure 1 HRA recommendation 2. Submission of the housing bond plan amendment to Metropolitan Council to review for consistency with the Metropolitan Housing Guide 30 City council decision, following a public hearing 49 Submission of the bond program to the MHFA for approval j w Attachments: 1.Location Map 20 Property Line Map 39 Site Plan 4.Market Opinion 5.Resolution 5 13 C F BC)F; 3 j L F BC 8 C F . F C R2 R -M 1/ F 0 LBC F MI 1 Ml BC .• ee - BC B F Of A A / LBC r-- rfIR2 -'7 6 C(M) A Ff---- -•-- -- Cd PUD R R2 F Cr F iLB Q R KOHLYM R N R Z V... • R 'r"t R ROAD R4. PUD• t• R •I I F Ml F R. Q P F C R r L i Ml ' EOGENILI RFWF ,. (R2) DEMONT . r , a - p I ..L C o R `' 9C ; F w R IBC S t....... --- ...... 4 J FsC: TA N AVE a It 11 GA w MI lkif R 3 z F AVMI MI ; [ JCtnNDviEwAV (^ k R ( DR .J M i R vJ ' TRUNK 11WAY 36 v, M I EAior• V C• t Ml AVE --- - ?- L-- .`.SaJ M I •R a - ` R L. RK 4 LBC) R Z NTY = t R R - 3C •• 1 RLFlANDn '.O ST 4 A J C I R t a a R LN tl AVE BURKE R3 AVE R F L RIDGE R bE M LADE R p q M I Q 1 0 F SK u. F R v _ MA AVE .,'`-' •'... m M I t,Q.r'r . ' F ASE R 2 R RYAN • ' • --- --- AYA IS ROSEWOOD r F LOCATION MAP 1 4 Attachment onei Q N t a..- dodo.__ ...+ •+r- r.r. •.. iwr..r•w 1 •. ' MA I . 122 8 r / "'.•••. .. rs• mar .r.. 1 _ r ..Bt K .1 7Qtnvvnrfi/ y J 1 rl V N fiat!IP f O Z) o 0 1 I 16 1 0646 w A of PIE V do N in O1.O 1 Doc . 0 o N g• 5 o Z 92 OA • 20 040 . A N Maplewood Covenant 64 Lu n i t multiple dwe l i n ` Church - .a.. 4. r 0 • ,• ' Q cuc , o • ONE C'e) As PHASE II 3 3 ' y lSa.Se Alf 4 5Z senor house ng • units ; I Superette :'5.1::-: (9 • •+ . PHASE I • : { ti... , . . 1J f.; ' P :•: _. •dodo '+::• . {• 22 Former Harmony School bui l di ng . J tom+ / /J • I ' •• • :'L :• .`.:.ti. f : • •.• : '• : }• f1. • • it 0 0 •', • ` • .1 X21) 0 doom dodo 263312'' - d SIM eq • 6, 500+1 square feet 'q of office/retail'1 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP t r Mltli.' __• ru.•• w• Y•_ wrw.• w +•r'_^^."....- ...•..w•.- +^^'^.. . r ._......•.......--•.«..... ... w.. r....-... _.««- .............- ....__._..._ _ 3 11 W 4116 y ' 7 , ss.t14Alto" Assn 40 C_ es, 9 R if id Z - ,• 94 fm O Ll G t W y id &A49" Tot ILS ae j Q rt w . c ./ / AIA W _. _ `` ILI it i_ b +_ 93 \ IT 1 low qq tjCO PA R K 1 G- n ? fl 1 TF1 T-3Q- ' I r•,AS : ; RECREAT 10 W AREA T111T 01.4 - AR i , L C MERCIAL r KIN(s• R1 M t^ A, LL t J F I t h ice - 1 artty 74 y •va,r. SI PLAN ' HARMONY SENIOR RESIDENCES 8 Attachment 3 Q N Gar E. Stout, President GS/m 9 SUMtiARY REPORT ADULT ONLY PROJECT This project is readily distinguished from other recent apartment proposals in Maplewood in that it: 1. is anon- family project. The complex is oriented solely towards the needs of adults (the so- called "empty nesters ") in Maplewood and surrounding communities. Although it has some similarities to the Health Resources project, the latter project has a distinct Health Maintenance orientation, and provides a very wide potential bundle of health services (including the ability to draw upon resources of St. John's Hospital). 2. Is a market rate rental project. Therefore,, it should not compete with the subsidized rents offered by existing adult and senior projects to Maplewood. 3. Is a combination new construction and rehabilitation project. 4. is located on a highly visible site, which a properly oriented marketing program could use to advantage. 5. Has very convenient access to neighborhood convenience commercial, and regional retail services. These include the convenience center proposed to the immediate west of the site, the new warehouse grocery proposed to the south, and the Maplewood Mall to the north. The services and retail diversity offered by these, and other, facilities in the immediate area will be very attractive to active senior adults. 6. Has the potential to offer basic health - related services in the 52 units in the western most portion of the site. This potential might range from provision of only the most basic services to a potential future point venture arrangement with Health Resources Assistance Corporation for a program similar to the one that they are proposing. Impact on Existing AoartMent% IMI)aCt On Existing Substdized- Elderly Units_ Based upon the review and analysis performed by Public Private Ventures, we have concluded that the specific rpo osed project would not adversely affect the average annual vacancy rates to a point above SR in existin sound.Mae.lewood rental complexes., he project.has following characteristics, which warrant this conclusion: 1. There are no State or Federal Section 8 or 242 or 236 subsidies involved in the project. 2. The monthly rental rates that must be, charged will average several hundred dollars more than current rentals in existing subsidized projects. Therefore, the proposed project will not compete with these existing complexes in terms of rent levels available. 3. The project will be limited to adults only. Therefore., it will not compete only marginally with the family projects in the remainder of Maplewood. Impact On Existing Conventional Bental Units. Since the project is limited to senior adults only, the potential competitive impact on existing fami and single rental units in Maplewood is minimized. There may be a limited amount of competition with conventional protects, since some conventional rental protects do house a limited amount of senior adults in rolects with familie However, this new project will be built at 1985 -86 construction and financingcosts. These are much greater than those experienced by older established projects in Maplewood. The "break -even" rental on this project will be significantly higher than the same break- even point for established projects. Therefore, due to this rent differential, should an unexpected problem develop, you should anticipate that this project would experience vacancy rates above 59 rather the existing projects in Maplewood. The project.-offers no rental subsidy other than the limited amount of subsidy required to meet revenue bonding requirements. This is a very shallow" subsidy compared to the Section 8, 202, or 236 programs. Therefore, the protect does not compete with the existingsubsid senior citizen rental housing in Maplewood. Impact On Proposed New Conventional Unit5. Finally, the proposed project will also avoid competition with other new Maplewood units that have been proposed. The recently approved Mapleridge project now.under . construction will be oriented toward.all ages and young families. ,The Lexington Investment Company proj ect will also be oriented tow ard all ages and young families and will provide amenities (underground parking,, larger unit. sizes, etc.) that will require a higher rental rate than the Mapleridge project. The Hazelridge project is supported by Health Resources, Inc. and will have a very strong hgalth grjeotalW. If some provision of health services are incorporated in the final plans for the 52 unit portion'of the project there 1s the possibility for a limited amount of duplication of services that are proposed to be provided by the Hazleridge project. However, this potential for duplication of health related services is not troublesome for the reasons mentioned below and because the market for this type of health related facility would extend beyond Maplew ood. The Hazelridge project has unique advantages in that it is associated with the St. John's Hospital and has a potential vast array of services that maybeprovidedinthatproject. The initial health related-services will include: priority entrance to a nursing home, home care, extended hours of care, a health and wellness exercise programs designed specifically for seniors, a congregate dining facility 0 meal a day) that is operated in a health- related manner, emergency call systems for accidents and injury,,etc. CQmr)etitioft Other Similar Pri la In addition, we are currently nor aware of any additional proposals by other developers non - family senior adult units in Maplewood. The Hazelridge project is%also being planned in an initial increment of 75 units, so as to avoid overloading the market at any one time. As mentioned previously, the extensive health services orientation of the Hazelridge project minimizes potential competition from this source. Rental Alternatives for Maplewood Senior Citizpn, Since there is currently a great deal of interest in the construction of multi - family market rate rental projects in the twin cities metropolitan Area, if the project as proposed is not available in Maplewood,, potential Maplewood residents of such a project w i l l locate in adjacent areas. There is strong interest in construction of such projects in Woodbury andothernearbycommunities. 12 If properly marketed, ' the unique orientation of the Harmony site project _ should attract tehantsf rom areas of suburban Ram sey.County outside the. City of Maplewood. Proper marketing of some of the strong points of the project,. including: its visibility, the nearby convenience and regional scale retail shopping, community services, etc, should allow the project to'attract interested tenants from a relatively large area and thereby greatly. expand its potential market. Regional Mark atistics Statistical Research on data available from the Metropolitan Council, the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, the Census, special surveys, and other sources reveals the following facts: increases in Elderly Pollulation. The growth in the total number of households for only the Elderly (over 65 years of age) portion of the Senior Citizen (over 55 years of age) has been projected to increase from 118,323 households in 1980 to 133,100 households In 1985 (a 12.49b increase over 1980) and to 149,240 total households in 1990 (a 26:1 R increase over 1980).. This increase of 31,000 in projected elderly households during the decade of the 1980's h a great deal of development interest in providing housing specifically adapted to the needs of the elderly (and to the broader market of senior citizens). Growth iD Demand for 5enigE Nnn it is estimated that approximately 3,591 senior housing units (including rental, condo, and coop) existed or were in the process of development, and an additional 2,413 units were proposed as recently as October, 1983. Currently, 3,494 units are estimated to exist, 1,285 are under construction, and another 4,293 are proposed and appear to have some viability. This 513b growth in the number of senior citizen units existing, under construction, or proposed (from a total of .6,004 to 9.,072) indicates a significant increase in market interest in providing such housing. Comeratia - Dev , e]ODMenta, This type of housing development is owned by a association, and residents buy a share for the right to occupy a specific unit in the development. A review of senior citizen projects in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area reveals that there are currently an estimated 987 co -op units available in the area, with another, estimated 361 under development. Co -ops have met significant market resistance in t in' the past but another 361. units are _ proposed for future development. y Condominium DeveloDmenta. In-this type of housing development, the residents own their units directly and also have an undivided interest in the common facilities in the development. There has also been market resistance on the part of senior citizens of placing their life savings into ownership of another dwelling unit. Even so, Interest in condo units have increased. A total of 666 senior citizen condo units are estimated to exist, another 417 are estimated to be currently under construction, and an additional 632 units are proposed in the region. in 1982 a study based upon a mail survey of 6 persons in the City of Maplewood determined that there was an apparent market for 150 condo units for older adults and the elderly in Maplewood only. At that time it was felt that the 150 unit ceiling could increase "through entrepreneurial efforts of the developers ". Due to increased regional interest to adult rental housing as opposed to ownership, perhaps one -third to one -half of this projected condo ownership demand could be converted to rental demand in Maplewood, if the proper attention was given to the units sizes, costs, and marketing orientation of the rental development. Life Care. In this type of housing development, the residents are guaranteed nursing home care in associated facilities if that care becomes necessary at some point in the future. Since life time health care is offered for a specific initial endowment, there are significant long term financial risks involved with sponsorship of this type of unit. Due to this risk, market resistance, problems with the nursing home moratorium and other difficulties, it appears that interest in this type of housing has diminished greatly in recent years. In this area, the Friendship Manor in Bloomington is an example of such a life care facility. Specific unit counts for this type of housing are not readily available. Elental In this type of housing development, the complex has a physical appearance comparable to a conventional rental project, however occupancy is limited to persons above a certain age group sometimes 50, SS, 60, or 65). There are several potential variations in the provision of senior rental housing. In some instances a limited amount of health care may be provided (such as provisions for active athletic activities), in others there may be an entrance or endowment fee which Is. used to provide equity for the development of the project. This fee is often used also to lower effective rents, and the refundability of the fee may vary greatly from project to project. i A total of 1,841 market rate senior housing rental units are estimated to exist currently in the Metropolitan Area. An additional 507 were under construction earlier this year and 3 were proposed, _ Maplewood Potential MaEket Demand HaDlewood Elderly PODUlatLon.In the 1980 Census Count, 22.89 of Maplewood's 26,990 citizens were over the age of 50. These 6, t 69 people would all be over the age of 55 now if there had been no population growth, no moves out of the City, and no deaths. The 1980 Census age break -down is as follows: 0ggg Population 50 -54 1,564 (5S7 iq, s5 ,;J 'ags 55 -59 1,410 60 -64 1,019 65 -69 702 70 -74 509 75+965 Total 6 Itis interesting to note that both this protect and the Hazeirldge proje wdsmwcouldberentedsolelytoMaplewoodresidentsiflessthan49ofthis population desired to live in the proposed pro ect purvey of Elderl Desires ,, A survey. of Maplewood's senior citizens was undertaken in 1982 in order to determine housing preferencesandpotentialdesirestopurchasecondominiumsdesignedfortheelderly.The results were published in a volume entitled "An Executive Summary of the Market Feasibility of Constructing Condominiums for Older Adults in Maplewood, Minnesota ". Of the people responding to the survey, 49F* indicated an interest in moving out of their existing homes. into a unit specifically designed fortheelderly (in this case a condominium). A desire to stay in or near Maplewood was expressed by 63%.. Congregate dining was desired by 389boftherespondents. This early maket survey would tend to indicate a strong interest in elderly housing developments that provide the types of services and amenities offered by this proposed project. Aspreviously noted, it is conservatively estimated that at least one third'to one half of this ownership interest may be capable of conversion to rental interest. 1 Project FeaBibilit)Lqr Given the current demand for rental housing in the area, the units that you construct should rent at an acceptable rate with good marketing and competitive pricing. The. 1 to.3 yearperiod normally required for full rent -up and financial stabilization in a project of this size may be shortened if you can move the project .rapidly toward construction this calendar year. High quality project design, interior finishes, marketing, managing, and unit pricing will enable the success of this project. Based upon existing information, the basic financial feasibility of this project appears to depend upon tax exempt financing, an early construction start, and project initiation under existing Federal tax legislation, This conclusion is based upon a number of factors, as summarized below. Basically, Maplewood has a projected average annual rental housing UJal S demand in the range of approximately 256 units per year, for the next five years. After five years, the total demand should decrease, based upon current Metropolitan Council projections. Due to low vacancy rates, the current year's demand for 256 rental housing should be increased by at least 107 units (as previously estimated by another consultant) in order to account for the amount of construction necessary to increase vacancy in sound rental units up to approximately the Sib rate that is considered normal and optimal. This project will compete in the upper one third of the estimated current market of 363 units. Given the relative lack of construction of rental units in the Maplewood over the past few years, the above projection should be considered conservative in that there is most likely some "latent" demand for units that normally would have been built in former years had the opportunity been available. This latent demand has not been fully accounted for and therefore i s not added to the above first year market projection. Z ° C ,•C nesSa -ass o.c e, Demand for Senior Units Using the perc tage of citizens of Maplewood who were over the age of SS in 1980 t 17) it is possible to do a rough approximation of the annual demand for rental units for citizens over 55. With the first year demand for 363 total rental units, an annual demand of approximately 62 elderly rental units can be derived,, with on -going annual demands for 43.5 units per year. To this should be added a conservative estimate of SO units of potential rental interest as determined by the 1982 survey. This constitutes a - 1985 demand for 112 units, with an. demand in the years of 1986 through.1990 for an additional approximately 43.5,. units per year. It, is felt that this is a conservative projection in that it does not reflect the fact that have been no adult only market rate projects completed in Maplewood. Therefore, this demand for elderly housing rental units has been unmet in the City for the past several years. in addition, the Harmony school project, in a highly visible location and with convenience shopping amenities immediately adjacent, should attract residents from outside Maplewood and expand the current market in the City. Other Market Factors Considec The above projections consider: the location of job centers in and near Maplewood, the proximity of the City to nearby population centers, the urban amenities that Maplewood'offers the City's relative lack of problems experienced in most urban areas, the constrained housing growth in the past, the relatively high job growth in the past, the future projections of job growth, the impact of job'transf ers on housing demand close to places of work, the relatively high ratio of housing unit growth to population growth experienced in.Maplewood in the past, relatively low local and regional vacancies, declines in turnover rates for rental housing in Maplewood to a point below regional averages in recent years, increases apartment rents in the City over the past few years, regional and local fluctuations in multi- family construction, the effect of the proposed changes in federal taxation on current and future rental unit development, projections of population and household increase for Maplewood and surrounding municipalities, the high past and projected future ratio between job growth and household growth within Maplewood boundaries, greater consumer desire for location in inner ring suburbs due to increased concern about commutation times, the potential impact of future increases of mortgage interest rates on future multifamily housing construction, the potential impact of increased construction costs on multi- family construction, the potential competitive financial impact of constructing new multifamily construction at existing tax exempt rates on units built during the past d and other relevant factors. Ability to Meet Low any t1oderatp Beguirement Based upon a review of the requirements of currently enacted legislation, the median income in Maplewood and the region, and the type of housing proposed in this project, it is our conclusion that adequate housingneed and demand exists in the municipality bz moderate income residents, at or under the maximum current family moderate income limit of $26,240, to fill 20% of the units with the required low:or moderate income residents. _ This,conclusion is based upon a consideration of the following facts: that these.. i are re- evaluated and increased in proportion with increases in average family income in the region; that only the income (not the assets) of the senior adults and elderly are considered; and that the project has the option to skew rents charged in 209 of the units to ensure that these units will be affordable in the event that an unexpected problem did develop at some point in the future. Therefore, the project should be able to comply with the federal low -to- moderate income requirements over the life of the bond issue. 19 RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A FINANCING PROGRAM FOR A MULTI- FAMILY RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT AND THE HOUSING PROGRAM, PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES,.CHAPTER-462C, AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD TO ISSUE HOUSING REVENUE BONDS AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF THE HOUSING PROGRAM FOR THE PROJECT FOR APPROVAL TO THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS.AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE SAID PROJECT AND PROGRAM' HARMONY SENIOR RESIDENCES PROJECT) WHEREAS, a) Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C the "Act) confers upon cities the power to issue revenue bonds to finance a program for the purposes of planning, administering, making or purchasing loans with respect to one or more multi - family housing developments within the boundaries of the city; b) The City has received from Smith Investment Properties, a Minnesota general partnership with Bret M. Smith, N. Russell Smith and Norman P9 Smith as the general partners (the "Developer "), a proposal that the City undertake a program to finance. a Project hereinafter described through the issuance of revenue bonds or obligations (in one or more series or which may be in the form of a single debt instrument) (the Bonds ") pursuant to the Act; c) The City desires to: facilitate the development of rental housing within the community; encourage the development of affordable housing opportunities for residents of the City; encourage the development of housing facilities designed 20 A +fat ` hmnn4 - r f for occupancy by persons of low or moderate income; and encourage the develo ment of .P blighted `or underutilized land and structures within the boundaries of the Cit ; and theY . Project will assist the City in ach'ievin g . these objectives; d) -The : Developer is en a ed in thegg , business of providing rental housing. The Project to be financed by the Bonds is the construction, renovation and equipping of two buildings , one containing approximately 5 2. rental units and anticipated to. consist of # 441 tom- one - bedroom units , and the other buildin g containing approximately 64 rental units and anticipated to consist of 16 one - bedroom units and 4 8 two- bedroom units , located at the northeast corner of the intersection of White Bear Avenue and County Road C in the City, which will result in the rovision ofP additional rental housing opportunities to . persons within the community; e) The City has been advised by the Developer that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital costs of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the Projectwouldbesignificantlyreduced, but the Developer has also advised the City that with the aid of municipal financing, and resultin glowborrowingcosts, the Project is economi. cal ly more feasible; f) A public hearin on the Pro ' ect andgJ the housing program was he 1 d on November 2 5 , 198 5 by the Maplewood City Council, of ter notice was published, all as required byMinnesotaStatutes, Section 462C . 05 , subd. 5 , at which public hearing all those a earinPP g at said hearing who desired to speak were heard ; g) No public official of the Cit hasYeitheradirectorindirectfinancial interest in the Project nor will an ubli cYP official either directly or indirectly benefit financially from the Project; 21 h) The housing program has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for its review and comment. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT* RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows:. 1. The City hereby gives preliminary approval to the proposal of the Developer that the City undertake the Project, described above, and the ' program of financing therefor, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, consisting of the construction, renovation and equipping of multi - family rental housing facilities within the City pursuant to the Developer'sspecificationsandtoarevenueagreementbetweentheCityand the Developer on such terms and conditions with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary, so as to produceincomeandrevenuessufficienttopay, when due, the principal and interest on the Bonds in a total principal amount of approx-imately $6,500,000 to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the construction, renovation and equipping of the Project; and said agreement may also provide for the entire interest.of the Developer therein to be mortgaged to the purchaser or purchasers of the Bonds, or a trustee for the holder (s) of the Bonds; and the City hereby undertakes preliminarily to issue its bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions; 2. The housing program is hereby approved and adopted and the City Clerk is authorized and directed to submit the housing program to the Minnesota Housing Finance AgencyMHFA") for its review; 3. At the option of the Developer, the financing maybestructuredsoastotakeadvantageofwhatevermeansare available and are permitted by law to enhance the security for, or marketability of, the Bonds; provided that any such financing structure must be approved by the City; 4. On the basis of information available to the City, it appears, and the City hereby finds, that the Project-constitutes a multifamily housing development within the meaning of subdivision 5 of Section 462C.02 of the Act •that the Project will be primarily occupied, in part, by persons of low or moderate income; that the availability of the financingundertheActandthewillingnessoftheCitytoprovidesuch financ PingwillbeasubstantialinducementtotheDeveloper to undertake the Project, and that the effect of the Project, if 22 undertaken, will be to encourage the provision of additional multi- family rental housing opportunities to residents of the City, to , assist in ' the prevention of the emergence of bl, i ghted and marginal land and to promote more intensive development and use - of land within the City; 5* The Project, and the housing program to finance the .'Project by the issuance of revenue •bonds, are hereby given preliminary approval by the City subject to the review of the housing program by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (the MHFA ") and subject to final approval by the City, the Developer and the purchasers of the Bonds as to ultimate details of the financing , of the Project; 6. In accordance with subdivision 5 of Section 46 2C . 05 , Minnesota Statutes,, the Mayor of the City is herebyauthorizedanddirectedtosubmitthehousingprogramfor financing the Project to the MHFA, requesting its review, and other officers, employees and agents. of the City are hereb authorized to provide the MHFA with preliminary information as it may require; 7. The Developer has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project whether or not the Project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by MHFA will be paid by the Developer; 8. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, is authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Project and the housing program therefor, to consult with the City Attorney, the City's fiscal consultant, Developer and purchasers of the Bonds (or trustee for the purchasers of the Bonds)-as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms and provisions of the Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary documents and submit such documents to the City for final approval; 94D Nothing in this Resolution or the documents prepared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose. The Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or funds of the City except the revenues and proceeds pledged to the 23 payment thereof, nor shall the City be subject to any liability thereon . The holder or- holders of the Bonds shall never have the right to ' compel any exercise of the tax ing, power of the City to pay the,-outstanding principal on the Bonds `or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereon against any property of the City. The Bonds shall recite, in substance , that the Bonds, including the interest thereon, are payable solely from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof* The Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or.statutory limitatloon; 100 In anticipation of the approval by the MHFA and the issuance of the Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Project, and in order that completion of the Project-will not be unduly delayed when approved, the Developer is hereby authorized to make such expenditures and advances toward payment of that portion of the costs of the Project to be financed from the proceeds of the Bonds, as the Developer considers necessary, including the use of interim, short -term financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds. of the Bonds if any when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the City; 11. If construction of the Project is not started within one year from the date hereof, this resolution shall thereafter have no force and effect and the preliminary approval herein granted is withdrawn. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota this 25th day of November, 1985. 24 I, the undersigned, being 'the duly qualified and acting clerk of the City of Maplewood Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City dulyY called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to a resolution giving relimina approval to aPz'y PP multi - family rental housing development projbct. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 25th day of November, 1985. SEAL) City Clerk 25 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY November 11, 1985. l , Call to Order Chairman Fischer. called the meeting to. order at •7.25 p.m. 2. Roll Call Commissioners: Dale Carlson Present Thomas Connelly Present Lorraine Fischer Present Robert Larson Absent Greg Schmit Present HRA /HRC Liaison: Mary Eiden Present 30 Approval of Minutes Commissioner Schmit moved and Co ' ap rove the S mmissioner Carlson seconded toPeptember10,1985 minutes, subject to revising sing Item two --roll call, to show that Mary Eiden was in attendance. Motioncarried, ayes - -all. 4. Approval of Agenda The agenda was accepted with the following changes: consider item7A; Tax - Exempt Financing (Harmony Seniors' Residences)ences} before item 5-Communications and add items 5D- -Metro Housin Guide and 5 E --Commissioner Larson's resignation. e.w Bus l nest: A. Tax- exempt Fina.ncin -- Harmon - ' 'g ., y Seniors .Residences Gary Stout, the marketing nd f inan •g c i al consul t.an•t for thissdevelopment, was in attendance. to answer, questioqns, Commissioner Connelly moved 'y and Commissioner Carlson seconded torecommend: (1) ,preliminary approval of $6.5 million in tax-exempt mortgage revenue financing f or ' the 116 -unit HarmonySeniorsresidences' development, subject 'P . to construction .beginning within one year and (2) amend the city's 'housing bondplantoincludethis $6 ..:5 , mi.11 ion tax - exempt .f inancin program,ram. P g 50 Communications . A. Tax - forfeit Land Transfer-Plan On November 6, 1985 the city council approved the lan as recommended, The resolution P of approval requested Ramsey Countytoapprovetheconcept. The resolution has been submitted totheRamseyCountyLandCommissionerforconsiderations, wr. Action by C o` nc i. MEMORANDUM ftdorsed Mod.ifie &.- TO: Acting City Manager FROM: Public Works Coordinator R. SUBJECT: Award of Bids ' DATE: November 15, 1985 On November 12, bids were received for two 1 -ton cab and chassis and one 1 1/2 -ton cab and chassis. A tabulation of the bid is attached. A requirement of the bid was that all three units must be bid, Though the bid of Thane- Hawkins Polar Chevrolet was $57.00 less than the bid of Merit Chevrolet for the two 1 -ton units, Polar Chevrolet elected not to bid on the 1 1/2 -ton unit, and therefore, must be rejected. An alternate bid was taken for the installation of an automatic transmission on the 1 1/2 -ton unit. The bid was $3,360.00. This alternate bid was taken to assist in determining the feasibility of eliminating down time and maintenance costs associated with clutch failures we have experienced on other vehicles, Acceptance of. this alternate is recommended. The bid of Merit Chevrolet in the amount of $40,900.00, including the automatic transmission alternate is recommended. It should be noted that the amount of $36 , 9OO.00 was budgeted for one 1 -ton truck and one 1 1/2 -ton truck in the 1985 budget, and that 16, 600 .00 was included in the 1986 budget for an additional 1 -ton truck. These amounts, totaling $53,5OO.00, including dump boxes on all three units and new snow plows for the two 1 -ton units. It is anticipated that the remaining budgeted funds will be sufficient to purchase the plows and boxes. TABULATION OF BIDS Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of theheofficialsdesignatedforabidopeningbytheYCitCouncilof Maplewood was convened at 10:30 a.m., CST, Tuesday, November 12Thepurposeofthismeetingwas . ' 1985* to receive, open and publicly readaloudbidsfortwo (2) one (l)-ton cab and chassis and one l one andonehalf (1 1/2) -ton cab and chassis. Present were: W. Cass and J. Chlebeck Following the reading of the notice of advertisement for bidsfollowingbidswereopenedandread: , the ITEM Two 1 -Ton Cab & Chassis One 1 1/2 -Ton Cab & Chassis Total Bid Alternate - -Auto Tranmission for 1 1/2 -Ton Cab & Chassis BIDDER Merit Chev., Inc. 22, 391.00 15,15000 37,540.00 3,360 *00 Thane - Hawkins Polar Chev. 22,276.00 No Bid 22,276.00 No Bid All bids were accompanied by a bond or certified check in the amountof5% of the bid, Pursuant to prior instruction of the council, the city lerk referredYeerredthebidsreceivedtothedirectorofpublicworksinstructingghlmtotabulatesameandreportwithhisrecommendationattheregulargrcitycouncilmeetingofNovember25, 19850 Meeting adjourned at 10:45 a.m. TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: Mid/ ArR i ie ytq+gMYMMCityManager Thomas Ekstrand-- Associate Planner Special Sign Permit Request ate 3035 White Bear Avenue --- Maplewood Square The Tan Line Maplewood Square Associates The Tan'Line November 14, 1985 SUMMARY Re uest Approval to allow two extra portable sign permits a year for The Tan Line at the Maplewood Square Shopping Center. Refer to the letter on page 5 . Code Require See page 6 8- 11 -81: The design review board approved a special portable sign permit for Buck's Unpainted Furniture at the Plaza 3000. Approval was subject to no additional special permits being issued for the complex until a. permanent message board is erected. The board reviewed this request for the council, since the board would be meeting before the council and there was some urgency for the applicant. The poor visibility of the Maplewood Square is a problem that has surfaced previously with Bernard's restaurant and the Sound of Music (former tenants) as well as the applicant. So not to set a precedent that would undermine the intent of the ordinance's sign control, this request should not be granted. The proper and permanent remedy is for the shopping center owner to apply for an amendment to their sign plan to incorporate better permanent reader board space on the pylon sign. Approval 'of one additional portable sign permit, as Buck's was allowed, would be consistent with the previous city action. This would also give the applicant an opportunity to use a sign while attempting to convince their lanctl6 d that a permanent solution is needed. Approval of one .20 —day portable psignpermit for the Tan Line for the remainder of 1985. The applicant must obtain the standard sign permit from staff. , Jc Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property. Line /Zoning Map 3. • Applicant's letter dated 10 -31 -85 4. Portable sign ordinance 2 lim i W rs HEIGH rS co RD o I I ; U 1 I f A M ... j trpRK AV Iran Lake Ko C G o v O o Y a Q GERVAIS AV Y N, 1 A. w W w 2 R, AV (WSSA Ni i by I WaC LOCATION MAP 3 Attachment One V.5 - - 4 N c... .'; ..- .J.-.r..r' .. ..w.... i- w•wnW•rwYnrrn.a...f..•. u....s.... ... ....._..i. r,.. l....... u. ilr... r4/+ N1wN irLiwNIi :YU..U,tr'!'.rMldZyta'Yn JigMSW9Y a.+Wwawlw•FSO!a+e+wwaw.. c• . 3.50 k, t- X40. s r ' S. 0z r P. 61 is7 S d, Oi 1 p Lin o K 46915' it..... _..,.... ---C °1..._ 1 t RRr13-04'e: 2! 2LOS :,• -I Q c ton N i51 I a A / ap O moo._p3t'46.2 C r c I. 3alc. Qi r S n to 30 704 - 6rVC-44C 4 a. 3. 7a,,c• 4 THE TAN LINE "w MAPLEWOOD MALL 4Pp0 r Ir.) PLAZA 3000 0 ( - - ro.&o; w M 'Q' • 39ac. x . •.. 4 _.... e, . _ VM 7z5 • ... ..._ z•y'' .a• 188.x$' P, rn Fcc. h}o.. 8o7s . Sb .58' A 1f'ao• 1.2t C.c. 7.75 ac SPo• o /3 pc ` WATER ION 4e,090' N r 12 N ` PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 Attachment Two 4 N 1 , 1 PORTABLE .'SIGNS r »..... ».•.... 1. _....... • Sec. 36 -279. Portable signs, 1•a) A permit must be obtained from the administrator for a 1 , portable sign to be used, in the city, but no fee is required to 'q be paid,therefor. b) No portable sign shall be ermitted for 'p a period to exceed twenty (20) days at the same ' location, and only one portable n may be located on a lot 'at an signg y e time. Portable signs may not bepermittedonthesamelotmorethantwiceperear, exc bY p yspecialpermitfromthecitycouncil. The city ouncil mYy additional portable signs by special permit for multiuse commercial centers. ` c) Portable signs with content of a ublic informationpormation nature shall not exceed two hundred fifty (250) square feet in area. Other portable signs shall not exceed -thirty -two (32) square feet in area or ten (10) feet in height, without approval, of a special permit b thecitycouncil,p y d) The required minimum setback for ortable si 'p g s is ten (10)feet from any lot line. 1 e) Off- site'portable signs are prohibited (Ord. No. 427, § 818.150(2),7-14-77; Ord. No, 458, § 1,1- 18 -79) N t Portable sign: A sign constructed to be movable from one loca- tion to another and not permanently attached to the round or to any immobile structure. g Such sign may .consist of a mobile st_ ruc_ -ture such as a semitrailer, carriage, van sled or oth ' 'er devicewhoseprimaryfunctionduringaspecifictimeistoserveveasasign. 6 Attachment Four N i mom MEMORANDUM A Action by Counall: T0: City. Manager ROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson SUBJECT: Home -Share Pilot Pro ram od.ifjeg DATE: November 8, 1985 Rejeote Dat SUMMARY Request 10 Approve Maplewood's entering into the joint powers agreement between the study area communities and Lutheran Social. Services (LSS) 2. Authorize an increase from $2*, 660 to $2, for Maplewood's contribution for 1986, 3. Appoint a city representative (s) to the ro ram steeringPgg commission. 4. Authorize associate planner -- Johnson to staff the Home Share Pilot Program steering commission. Comments Increased Contribution: White Bear Lake has chosen not to participate in this program. ThepPg other nine study area communities, in addition to Maplewood, have approved the enclosed joint powers agreement. (A listing of the participating communities is on page four of the agreement.)g ) Supplemental funding from area civic organizations could not be arranged to cover the $481 budget shortfall that resulted from White Bear Lake's decision not to participate. The cities of North St. Paul and Roseville have each agreed to pay an additional $160, provided Maplewood agrees to do likewise, in order to cover the $480 deficit. Maplewood's present commitment is for $2,656. Maplewood's Program Steering Commission Representative: Section 3.1 of the agreement lists the interests that may be represented on the steering commission. If council desires, Maplewood could have two representatives - -one for the city in general and one from the HRA who would represent HRA' s in general. (None of the other communities in this study area with an HRA has * expressed a desire to fill this position.) Unless council desires to have a general city representative and an HRA y P representative, Dale Carlson or Lorraine Fischer, the HRA commissioners who have been involved in- the study since it began, should :'be' appointed to represent both interests . The other should be appoi n.ted as, the alternate -. . Staff to the Program Steering Commission: Each of the parties to the agreement have expressed a desire for Maplewood to continue . to staff, this 'effort, at least for the first year Y It is anticipated that little staff time will be needed during, the first two years of the proposed three -year pilot program. The primary duties will to monitor where the matches are occurring and to coordinate the acquisition of funds the second and third years of the study. Toward the end of the third year, the commission would evaluate whether a long -term program is necessary, and if so, it would recommend how it should be financed and what organization should manage Recommendation 1. Authorize the mayor and city clerk to sign the prepared joint powers agreement for the Home Share Pilot Program. 20 .;Approve a transfer in the 1986 budget of $160 from the contingency account to account 01- 4480 -09. 3e Appoint up to two representatives, one from the HRA and one from the city (one of which should be Dale Carlson or Lorraine Fischer from the HRA), and appoint an alternate for each to serve on the Home Share Program Steering Commission, 4o, Authorize Maplewood (associate planner - Johnson) to continue to supply the staffing for the Home Share Program Steering Commission. N BACKGROUND Past Action On July 22, 1985, council adopted a "resolution of intent t'o participate" in this pilot program. An expenditure 'of $2 ; 656 for the 1986 program budget was also authorized. Joint Powers Agreement 1. Refer to the enclosed agreement, 2. Provisions for reimbursement of city contributions - -this joint agreement (Section 4.9) provides for the reimbursement, to the extent possible, of each city's contribution from the $200 fee to be charged for each home -share match. The agreement. also provides for the reimbursement of $986 to Maplewood for the needs assessment (Section 4.6) that was conducted last February. Procedure HRA recommendation City council decision mb Attachment. Joint powers agreement 3 October 17, 1985 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT OLDER ADULT HOME-SHARE. PROGRAM THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the date'of execution, by and between the cities of Falcon Heig Hugog , , Lauderdale, Little Canada, Maplewood,'North St. Paul.,'Oakdale,Roseville, Vadna i s Heights and White Bear Township, hereinafter referred to as-the "participating communities," and Lutheran Social Services, hereinafter referred to as "LSS . " WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the participating communities have authority, pursuanty, p t to Minnesota Statutes 471.59, to jointly or cooperatively, bY Yagreement, exercise any powers common to the contracting parties; WHEREAS, the Older Adult Home Share Task Force hereinafterreferredtoasthe "Task Force , " was created on October 9 1984 as asubcommitteeoftheMaplewoodHousingandRedevelopmentAuthority, InresponsetoadirectivefromtheMaplewoodCityCounciltostudtheneedforahome-sharing program; Y WHEREAS, LSS has successfully administered a ho 'me- sharing programsince1980, entitled Share -A -Home; WHEREAS, the Task Force conducted a questionnaire survey in January 1985. A finding of this survey was that approximate) 2500 urisolderadultswhoresideinthe •dictlons of the Roseville, WhiteBearLakeandMaplewood -North St. Paul - Oakdale school districtshereinafterreferredtoasthe "stud area," wouldY , d be expected to beinterestedinsharingtheirhomes; WHEREAS, the Task Force concluded that a three 'y pilotexpansionoftheLSSShare -A -Home program would be the most efficientandcost-effective way to evaluate the actual demand for a long-termprogram; WHEREAS, the existing LSS Share - A - Home program is not sufficiently funded to service the projected demand within the studyarea; WHEREAS, each participating community as adopted a "resolutionYPofintenttoparticipate" in a joint effort to sponsor a three-yearpilot- program expansion of the LSS Share -A -Home program, hereinafter referred to as "the pilot g p t program, to serve the study area, IT IS THEREFORE, mutually agreed that the rules and proceduresunderwhichthepilotprogramshalloperateareasfollows: ARTICLE I NAME The Parties hereto create and establish the Older Adult Home -Share Steering Commission, hereinafter referred to as the "Commission." ARTICLE II PURPOSES The primary purposes of the pilot program are to evaluate. the need to 1. Provide a short - or long -term option for older adults who would rather remain in their homes while 'waiting for an* apartment to become available .where they want to live' but, for whatever reason, can no longer maintain their present dwelling. The waiting lists for area seniors' residences are often very long forcing persons to - relocate to apartments away from family and friends. 2. Provide an alternative for those older adults who wish to remain in their homes their entire lives, but because they can no longer maintain their homes, they must move to the costly and. unfamiliar surroundings of a nursing home, ARTICLE III ORGANIZATION 3.1 Interests Represented The following interests may be representated on the Commission,. hereinafter referred to as "Commissioners." A commissioner may represent more than one interest: a. One official from each participating community; b. One school district senior services official from within the study area; c. One official from Health Resources, Incorporated; do One housing and redevelopment authority ( HRA) commissioner from a participating community; e. One official from each financial sponsor other than the participating communities; f. One senior outreach worker who is familiar with older adults in the study area; g. One manager of a seniors' residence that is located within the study area; h. One official from Washington County's home -share referral program; and i . One person who is aware of available sources of persons whoP want to be live -ins. 3.2 Commissioner Appointments a. Commissioners to represent a group of similar parties shall be appointed by those parties. If a group cannot agree on a representative, then the Task Force /Commission shall determine by 2 selection or by lot. Vacancies shall be filled in the same manner. The Task Force shall solicit candidates for commission representatives under. items 3.1 (f) and (g) b. Commissioner and alternate designation should occur at meeting of the Task Force prior to November ,15 , '- 19 8 5 A candidate for each interest .should attend this meeting. However, if a candidate cannot be in attendance, they may be designated if they have previously communicated their willingness to serve, C.0 Each Commissioner is entitled to one alternate. d . Each commissioner and alternate term shall be for the duration of the pilot program or until replaced. e. Commissioner and alternate designation, except for those the participating communities. community must enter into this becomes effective. 3.3 Compensation and Expenses Commissioners shall not be entitled for expenses from the Commission to terms shall become effective upon commissioners who will represent In which case their respective agreement before their term to compensation or reimbursement attend its meetings. 3.4 Officers The Commission shall elect from its membership a chair and vice- -chair and such other officers as it deems necessary to carry out the purposes of this agreement. An officer may serve for the duration of the pilot program. A vacancy in an office shall be filled from the membership of the Commission, by election. In the absence of an officer, his or her alternate shall exercise only the power of a commissioner and not of said office position. 3.5 Quorum Fifty percent of the total number of participating commissioners shall constitute a quorum. A quorum is required to convene a scheduled meeting but less than a quorum may adjourn a scheduled meeting. 3.6 Meetings Regular meetings of the Commission shall be held at such times as the Commission shall select. 7 TTni-o Any action taken by the Commission shall be by majority vote of the commissioners in attendance. ' 3.8 Commission Staffing a. The Commission shall be staffed by a staff person employed by one of the participating communities, LSS staff to the pilot program shall report to the commission staff as necessary to 3 sat.i sfy the ..objectives of the pilot program. Out -of- pocket expenses, including legal fees, that are incurred by the partici- pating communities' staff person, while performing ommissiong duties may . be reimbursed from the matching fees collected, subject to the-Commission's-approval, The participating parties' staff person may rotate among the: communities , a.s the communities mutually agree. b. The Task Force /Commission shall recommend to the part'ici- pating communitites the staff person to be selected. Selection shall be mutually agreed to by.the communities. Said selection should occur on or before November 15, 1985. The Task Force staff shall oversee the organization of the Commission until the staff selection process is completed: 3.9 Expansion of Participating Communities Any community, not a party to this agreement, but located within the study area may become a party to the agreement, upon majority vote of the Commission. The Commission may require a fair -share contribution see Section 4.1) as a condition of permitting a community to join the agreement. ARTICLE IV FINANCING 4.1 First Year Budget (1986) The first year (January 1 to December 31, 1986) budget for the three - year pilot program is $12,646. It consists of $11,397 for LSS's administration of the program and $1,249 to reimburse the City of Maplewood for conducting the home -share needs assessment in ,January 1985. Each study area community was asked to contribute to the 1986 budget on the basis of their 1980 older adult population, as follows, hereinafter referred to as their "fair -share contribution ": Chose not to participate Refer to Appendix A for final contribution amounts 4 of Study Areas Study Area 1980 Older Adult Fair -Share Contribution Communities Population Needs Assmt.).(Program)Total Falcon Heights 5.3 66 604 =670 Hugo 1.7 21 194 =215 Lauderdale 1.6 20 182 =202 Little Canada 5.0 62 570 =632 Maplewood 21.1 263 2,393 =2,656 ** St. Paul 8.2 102 935 =1, 037 ** Oakdale 5.0 62 570 =632 Roseville 33.6 420 3,829 =4,249 ** Vadnais Heights 290 25 228 =253 White Bear Township 2.9 36 331 =367 White Bear Lake*13.7 172 1,561 =1,733 lo 1,249 11,397 =12,646 Chose not to participate Refer to Appendix A for final contribution amounts 4 4 . 2 Amount of Contribution Each participating community is contribution listed in Section contribute more . in the event of provided in Section 4.3. The Commission may recommend to fair-share contribution formula program, obligated to pay the fair -share 491, unless a community agrees to a funding shortfall and except, as the parties any mutually agreed upon for the. succeeding years of the pilot 4.3 Supplemental Funding In an effort to reduce each participating community's costs, the Commission /Task Force will seek, supplemental funding as available.g 4.4 Contribution Deadline Each participating community shall submit their contribution to LSS not later than the third working day in January of each program year,beginning Friday, January 3, 1986. LSS shall submit copies ofp receiptsreceived ( contributors and amounts) to the commi ss ion as soon as opracticalintoeachprogram •g year. These lists shall be the basis for distributing the matching fees received (seeSections 4.7, 4.8. and 4.9 4.5 Segregated Account LSS shall place all of the pilot program's funds in an interest-bearingaccountthatissegregatedfromallotherLSSaccounts. The locationoftheaccountshallbedeterminedbyLSS. LSS shall p rovide the Commission with monthly statements of the account's balance. 4.6 Needs Assessment Reimbursement From the account required by Section 4.5, LSS shall reimburse the CityofMaplewood $986 for the cost of the needs assessment [ $1,249 total cost less Maplewood's $263 fair -share cost = $986 (see Section 4.1)].This reimbursement shall be made as soon as ract i cal from thee fair - share contributions (Section 4.2) or supplemental funding (Section 4.3 deposited in the Section 4.5 account in excess of $11,66 Ma lewood'spfair -share $263 cost for the needs assessment plus the $11,397 programbudget) together with fees received from the matching service, as outlined in Section 5.6 (a). If the $986 reimbursement has not been completed by December 31, 1986 matching fees received during the next year(s) of the program shall be used until the \ reimbursement is complete. 4.7. Crediting of Fees All fees collected by LSS for matches within a given community,Section 5.6a) , shall be credited by the Commission toward the following year's fair -share contribution to be requested from that participating community, except as provided in Sections 3.8 and 4.6. 5 4.8 Refund of Fees Upon Cancella of Agreement If a participating community chooses to cancel its participation inthisagreement, any fees collected for home -share matches within that community during that program - year shall be sent to that communi t bLSSuponwrittennoticefromtssion, except that this,Commi y y disbursement shall : n.ot exceed that community'.s fair - share contributi onforthatprogramyearAnyexcessfeesshallbeusedtofinancethepilotprogram. If a community to s its participation 'Y P p p Lion during a programyear, its fair. -share contribution for ' that year shall be forfeited except as provided in Section 4.9, 4.9 Distributions of Funds on Account Any funds and accrued interest in the Section 4.5 account that exist at the end of the pilot program shall be distributed among the parties except as provided in Section 3.8 and 4.6. The Commission shall devise an equitable distribution formula and direct LSS to withdraw funds fromtheaccountaccordingly. This formula may include an entity that hYy as participated in the funding of the program. ARTICLE V PILOT PROGRAM GUIDELINES 5.1 Responsibilities of LSS Day -to -day administration of the home -share pilot program shall be thesoleresponsibilityofLSS. The pilot program shall be governed by the same rules and procedures that LSS's Share - -Home program is governedby, except as otherwise stated in this agreement. 5.2 Staffing of Pilot Program The Commission /Task Force shall not participate in the selection of the staff person to administer the pilot program. This will be the sole responsibility of LSS. LSS shall administer the pilot program an average of twenty hours P erweekduring1986. The hours per week that the program is administered by LSS may vary from year-to-year, provided the objectives of the P i lot program are not compromised. 5.3 Study Area Office The LSS staff person will initially be officed at LSS's St. Paul offices at Besthesda Hospital. If LSS determines that the establishment of an office within the study area would be advantageous to the pilot program, it may secure such an office provided the office space is: (1) free of rent, and (2) as centrally located within the study area as possible. 5.4 Persons Eligible for Matching Services The pilot program shall be limited to persons residing within the jurisdictions of the participating communities. 5.5 Matching Service Priorit a . Matching of 1 i ve --ins and homeowners shall be on a, first-come first-serve basis within each participating. community. b. An attempt shall be made by LSS to make matches within all participating communities to"the extent that the fees g enerated will cover the contribution paid by each community. 5.6 Fee for Service a. The fee charged by LSS for matches outside of the study area shall be charged to persons participating in the pilot program. At this time the LSS fee . is $200 -- x-$100 from the live --in and $100 from the homeowner.) LSS shall be responsible for establishing an appropriate payment schedule for each match. LSS, may at its discretion, waive or reduce the fee for a live -in or homeowner who does not have the ability to pay the full fee. b. Receipts for matching fees collected shall be kept by LSS, on a community basis, and periodically made available to the Commission. c. LSS may keep any fees collected for matches made within the study area prior to the effective date of this agreement or for matches within a study area community that is not a party to this agreement. d. LSS shall take any appropriate action, subject to counsel from the Commission to collect delinquent fees. e. LSS shall submit a tentative budget to the Commission in the month of May for a succeeding year of the pilot program. LSS and the Commission shall mutually agree the annual budget(s). ARTICLE VI ROLE OF THE COMMISSION The Commission shall have the following duties and an other duties agreed upon y g p by LSS, the Commission and the parties to this agreement: a. The Commission shall monitor the number of inquiries and matches made within each participating community. b. The Commission shall solicit annual funding reauthorization not later than June 15 of each year from each participating community and each supplemental sponsor, if any. C. The Commission shall evaluate if there is need to establish a permanent home - -share program to serve the study area. do If the establishment of a long --term program is to be recommended, the Commission shall: (1) develop program and financing guidelines, and (2) take appropriateroriate measures to establish it. ARTICLE VII EFFECTIVE DATE This agreement shall be . in full force and effect upon: '1 ipC ) stexecutionby, each party, and' (2) upon ..a determination by-* the TaskaskForce /Commission and LSS, that at least $11,397 has been secured tofinancethefirstyear . of the program. ARTICLE VIII DURATION a. Each party agrees to be bound by the terms of this agreementuntilDecember31, 1988 unless a party chooses not to reauthorize its annual financing of this pilot program. b. If the Commission determines that adequate funding cannot be secured for a succeeding year of the pilot study, the commis shall be dissolved upon written notification of the parties. c. This agreement may be continued after December 31, 1988, by majority consent of the active parties. ARTICLE IX HOLD HARMLESS -- INDEMNIFICATION 9.1 Hold Harmless -- Indemnification LSS hereby covenants and agrees to indemnify and hold the commissioners and the interests they represent, staff person for the artici atinpp gcommunitiesandtheparticipatingcommunitiesharmless, from and against, any and all claims, demands, damages, debts liabilitiesg , , actions, causes of action, judgments, whether in law or in equity,based upon, relating to, or arising from LSS' S administration and operation of the pilot program. 9.2 Insurance LSS .shall present to the Task Force /Commission with evidence of liability and casualty insurance. 9.3 Disclosure of Claims and Liabilities LSS hereby certifies that there is no litigation, proceeding, governmental investigation or action of any kind pending or to LSS' S knowledge proposed against or threatened, relating to its Share -A -Home program. 9.4 Claims a. It is hereby understood and agreed that any and all employees of the LSS and other persons employed by the LSS in performance of any work or services relative to the pilot program provided Sf i for herein by the LSS, shall not be considered employees of the participating communities in that - any and all claims that ma .orymightariseundertheWorkman.' s Compensation Act of - .the State-ofMinnesotaonbehalfof '..said- leemployeeswhi ansoengagedand. and all claims made by 'anyany third parties as a copse uence of ` an act or omission on the LSS employees whale q so engaged ngaged on y part of ' work or services rendered herein by LSS, shall in no way e - ay n obligation or the responsibility of the, partici atin gcommunities,p b. It is understood and agreed that all employeesployees of ,. the Participating communities and all other persons employ ed b thepYYparticipatingcommunitiesinperformanceofworkandservicesacesprovidedorrequiredforhereinbytheparticipatingommunitiesshallnotbeconsidered g employees of the LSS and that any and allclaimsthatmayormightarise -under Workman's Compensationpensataon ActoftheStateofMinnesotaonbehalfof . said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said Participating community employees while so en gaged on any of theworkorservicestoberenderedhereinbytheparticipatingpgcommunitiesshallinnowaybetheobligationorresponsibilityoftheLSS. co It is understood that th staff •person for the participatingcommunitiesshallbecoveredbytheworkman's com`ensation i pinsuranceforthecommune. ty for which the person is employed, ARTICLE X AMENDMENTS The Commission may recommend amendments to this a reement - tog theparties. Amendments shall require approval b a majoritypy of thepartiestobecomeeffective. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this agreementgntbytheirauthorizedofficersandcausedtheirrepresentatives' sealstobehereuntoaffixed,, Seal: LUTHERANUHERAN SOCIAL SERVICESDated: Attest: 9 City Clerk Neal: CITY OF H UGO Dated:.' a By Mayor Attest: City Clerk Seal:CITY OF LITTLE CANADADated: By - Mayor Attest: City Clerk Seal: CITY OF MAPL EWOODDated: By Mayor Attest: City Clerk Seal: CITY OF NORTH.r.- -- ST* LDa . ef3 . /U C By ayo Attest: C t Clerk c + seal: CITY OF OAKDALE . Da ted : 10/30/85 By _ May4o r Attest: CA ity Clerk Seal: CITY F ROSEVILL Dated: .11 -6 -85 By Mayor At st : G City Clerk Seal: CITY OF VA Dated. 11 -6-85 DNAIS HEIGHTS B Y - Mayor Attest: Jqo ty Clerk Seal:WHITE BEAR•TOWNSHIPDated11./4/85 By Chai rm adi/ Attest: t Clerk Seal, CITY OF LAUDERDALE Dated: October 15, 1985 By Attest: G a City Clerk ADDENDUM A Authorized Contributions for the 1986 Program Budget Community Amount Falcon Heights 6 70 Hugo 215 Lauderdale 202 Little Canada 632 Maplewood 2j820 (proposed) North St. Paul 1j197- Oakdale 632 Roseville 4,409 Vadnais Heights 253 White Bear Township 367 Total 11,397 12 MINUTES MA PL EWOOD H AUTHORITY. . •OUS ING AND REDEVELOPMENT November 11 1985 . 1 • Call to Order Chairman Fischer called the-meetinging to order at' • 7, 25 p. we 2. Roll Call a Commissioners:4. Dale Carlson Present Thomas Connelly Present Lorraine Fischer Present Robert Larson Absent Greg Schmit Present HRA /HRC Liaison: Mary Eiden Present 7. New Business B. Home Share Pilot Program Commissioner Carlson moved and Commissioner Connellysecondedtorecommendapprovaloftherecommendation i.n the staff report.Motion carried,with three commissioners voting in favor and commissioner Schmit abstaining, •ta,ning. i i M TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: tion by. Couno : Endorse MEMORANDUM Modified City Manager ftte Associate Planner' Code Amendment - -Smal 1 er. Single Lots November 8, 1985 SUMMARY Request 1. Amend the zoning code for small lot single-dwelling pto: g g P perties a. Reduce the minimum lot width requirement. b. Increase the minimum side yard area for each lot. 2. Eliminate an inconsistency between the zoning nd subdivision the minimum g ncodesconcerninglotwidthfordouble - dwelling lots, Reason for the Request 1. At council's annual meeting with the HRA, council directed the HRAtopreparethecodeamendmentsnecessarytopromotesmallerlotsingle - dwelling development, such as the Willow Creek development InShoreview, 2. The lot width changes are being considered at this 'time, becauseEdCaveandSons, I nc , has applied for a lanned unitt deP velopment withsixty -foot wide single - dwelling lots. n - L One of the objectives of the comprehensive plan states "The cityityshouldcontinuetodeveloplanduseregulationswhichencourage aplannedapproachtohousingareasbyprovidingvarietyoflots'g y sizesandhousingdensitieswhichcomplimentthearea's land use lan an types" P dthedesireddwellingypes (Page 12 -8) . City code permits smaller single-dwelling lots of •g • g 7,5 square feet in areas planned for residential medium density use. The P roblem is thattheselotsarerequiredtohaveatleast75feetoflotwidth - -the same as conventional single - dwelling lots. According to area developers, this requirement discourages the development of 7square -foot lots. The less attractive market appeal of a shallow100 -foot deep lot ( 75 x 100 = 7, 5OO) eliminates or significantlyYreducesanycostadvantage. that could be gained by developin g 7,500square -foot lots. Ken Gervais, of Castle Design and Development,believes that 75 x 100 -foot lots cannot, on average, be sold for more than a 60 x 120 -foot lot, even though the 75 -foot wide lot costs at leapt $l more to improve with street and utilities, assumin g the land and financing costs are the same. This may explain why no 7,500 square -foot lot subdivisions have been developed in the six yearssincecouncilamendedthecitycodetoallowthem. The combined minimum side yard areas for small lot single-dwellingpropertiesshouldbeincreasedfromtentofifteenfeet, if the lotwidthisreducedasproposed. 'This would reduce the potential for overcrowding should a developer choose to build. from side _yard. setback to side yard setback : This situation is very likely, as most housingstylesthatarecurrentlybeingproposedincludeanattachedgarageNoneofthedeveloperscontactedopposethisrequirement. Recommendation Approve the enclosed ordinance on page 11. 2 BACKGROUND Past Actions 7 -5 -79: 4 ' Council amended the R -2, double- dwelling district to permit 75 -foot wide, - 7 , 510 ,square -foot s i,ngle- dwelling lots, Planning 110 Policy criteria from the plan: a. Page 18 -30: The RM, residential medium density classifi- cation is designed for such housing types as single dwellings on smaller lots, double dwellings, town houses and mobile homes, b. Page 12-5: An objective of the comprehensive plan is that the city encourage a variety of housing types and styles and shall be flexible and remain open to development requests which are in accordance with this objective. 2* Complance with land use laws: Refer to the R-2, double - dwelling zoning district requirements on page 9. These requirements apply to double dwellings as well as small -lot single dwellings. Public Works This proposal would not have an adverse affect on existing or lanned ut,i l i t and road systems, T • p Y y here would be no s'i'gnificantscant idifference n the number of lots that would be permitted per acre for 60 x 120 -foot versus 75. x 100 -foot lots, assuming that the maximum densityrequirementsarenotchanged. Developer Comments Several Maplewood developers were asked their opinion of this proposal. Each endorsed it. Four developers submitted letters of support (see pages 4 - g ) . 1. HRA recommendations 2. Planning commission recommendation 3. City council first reading following a public hearing, second reading and adoption. mb Enclosures: 1 -4. Developer letters of support 50 R -2 zoning code 6. Ordinance 3 i i s+l• mare nderson BETTER HOMES FOR BETTER LIVING MARVIN H. ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 8901 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55420 June 13,1985 TELEPHONE 881 -2661 3otb v 1982 Mayor John G reavu c/o Mr. Randy Johnson City of Maplewood 1902 East County Road B. Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mayor G rea vu : It is my understanding that the city of Maplewood will be considering a proposed ordinance to allow in a R -1 zoning area 60 foot lots. We are very delighted the city is taking this step forward. It w i l l allow another small portion of the buying market the capab i 1 i ty to purchase a new home with less lot costs and future maintenance costs due to a smaller lot, We must keep in mind that ' this considered change, at least in our case, w l I not reduce the qua i ty of hous ing, only chang i ng the pl acement of a home on a s m a l l e r . lot and a l s o the style of the home. Enclosed is a copy of the development plan which we submitted to the cityofBloomingtonin1984. This plan area was originally platted with eight large lots for twin homes. We felt the market was soft in twin homes and presented our proposal to the city of Bloomington to plat 13 single family I ots wh i ch have an average of 60 foot at the bu i 1 d i ng 1 i ne. Some of the I ots were presol d w i th a spec i f i c home requ i r i ng some add i t iona 1 footage. This gave us a 1 i ttl a more f 1 ex i b i 1 i ty of many home styles for each lot. In no case was a garage side yard setback and an adjacent home 1 i v i ng area to be closer than 15 feet. A 1 i v i ng area side yard and an adjacent 1 i v i ng area to be no closer than 20 feet. In the case of two garages being on the same common side yard, the distance was to be no closer than 15 feet, If the first garage was 5 feet from the side lot line, the adjacent garage would have to be 1 0 feet from the line, This type of reasoning a l l o w s assurance of some open space feeling between .structures. The city of Bloomington accepted our proposed p r e l i m i n a r y p l a t and we have almost completed construction of all the homes. The owners are very delighted with the qual i ty of the homes. They have no reservations about the size of their l o t s . They have t o l d me that yard care is at a minimum, a l l o w i n g them freedom for other activities. I If you would note on the enclosed p r e l i m i n a r y plat, the lots direct 1 y across the street to the south have frontages from 80 foot minimum up to 95 foot. These homeowners had no objection to this plan. 4 Attachment One t Major John G rea vu June 13., 1 985 Page 2 At a later date, I will furnish you photos of the homes that were constructed on 60. foot lots. We thank the city staff, planning commission and council members on the i t cons i derat ion of this proposed -ord i nance. It is a step forward in recognizing the needs for housing for new f a m i l i e s * Sincerely, MARV I N H ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION CO. Frederic E. Haas Vice P res. Land Development FEH:Iw enc. 5 f Suburban Developments June 12, 1985 r TILSEN HOMES AINC Residential Construction Honorable John Greavu 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mayor; Land Developers We understand the city is considering a zoning ordinance change to allow detached single family housing on smaller lots, includin g 60' wide lots and zero lot line plats. We feel this would be a useful change in the code and that we would look seriously t utilizingthem. "Patio Homes" and other smaller lot developments have been successful and have provided a good environment for homeowners both in the Twin Cities and across the country. Properly planned, theseYPYP can be an improvement over townhomes and condominiums of similar density. We hope the City of Maplewood wil,1 make these alternatives available. Yours truly; ji s A. Tilsen Tilsen Homes, Inc. JAT : ih Builders of o , 0 Attachment AP ent Two HOMES SSO ,At oN a, o r 627 SOUTH SNELLING AVENUE / ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55116 / PHONE 69R - 5501 June 4, 1985 Mr.Randy Johnson Associate Planner City of Maplewood 1902 E. County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 RE: 60 foot wide lots in the City of Maplewood Dear Mr. Johnson; I appreciated your request for comments regarding changing theggg or regarding lot widths in the City of Maplewood. I don't pretend to speak for the entire development community but can comment on our companies experience with narrow lots. We have not used the zero lot line single-family detached house arrangement. We have built homes on narrower lots, but only in subdivisions which have a variety of lot widths. That is, we have developed single "family detached homes subdivisons that have lots ranging from 60- to 70 feet wide. This range of widths has g ivenustheflexabilitytobuildseveralstyle. homes with conventional setbacks. Our company would make use of the 60 foot lot widths however, we almost certainly would not have an entire with lots 60 feet wide. One of the other- issues that you mentioned was regarding sideyardsetbacks. The idea of having 15 feet of total s idey.ard setback to be divided up by the developer makes a great deal of sense to me. My understanding. that provision would allow, for example, - 7P ,feet of setback on each side, under no case, less than 5 feet. I think this kind of flexability would greatly benefit home builders and developers. I appreciate the opportunity to comment on your Proposals in our ity Y S Ilk er J h eterson Di ctor of Development Attachment Three J RP • d • ' GOOD VALUE HOMES • Registered Builder • 1460 93rd Lane N.E., Blaine, MN 55434 -4396 • Phone: (612 ) 780 -5510 Goff Construction 1278 E. County Rd. C Maplewood, Minn. 55109 612- 484 -2566 June 10, 19.85 City of Maplewood 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 To Whom_It May Concern, The idea of 60' wide lots with zero lot line side yard set back has worked in other nearby communities and it can work in Maple-wood. It should be done in a multiple zoned area. It should not be done as 'a substitute to. the existing R1 requirements. Sincerely, Patrick W. Goff Goff Homes 8 Attachment Four DIVISION 4. R -2 RESIDENCE DISTRICT DOUBLE DWELLING) Sec. 36 -86. Permitted rises. Y In the R -2 Residence District, no building or land shall be used, and no building shall be erected, converted or structurally altered, unless otherwise provided herein, except for one or more of the following uses: 1) Any use specified in division 3 of this article, R -1 Residence District (Single Dwelling), and no other. 2) The minimum habitable floor area for each R -2 Residence District dwelling unit shall be at least: five hundred eighty 580) square feet per efficiency or one - bedroom unit; seven hundred forty (740) square feet per two - bedroom unit; eight hundred sixty - (860) square feet per three - bedroom unit; one thousand forty (1,040) square feet per four- bedroom unit. 3) Colleges, libraries and community center buildings, any of which shall require a special permit to be issued by the city council. (Code 1965, § 905.010; Ord. No. 527, § 1, 11 -8 -82; Ord. No. 551, § 1, 9- 12 -83) Sec. 36 -87. Height of buildings. No single- or two- family dwellings shall be erected or structurally altered in an R -2 Residence District to exceed thirty (30) feet in height, measured from the front or street side grade of the site. Code 1965, § 905.020; Ord. No. 471, § 1, 7 -5 -79) Sec. 36 -88. Lot dimensions; sewer requirements; etc. ka) No two - family dwellings shall be built or structurally altered in an R -2 Residence District on a site less than twelve thousand 12,000) square feet in area. b) No single - family dwelling shall be built or structurally al- tered in an R -2 Residence District on a site less than seven thousand five hundred (7,500) square feet in area. c) The minimum lot width in an R -2 Residence District shall be seventy -five (75) feet for interior lots and one hundred (100) feet for corner lots. d) No single- or two - family dwelling shall be built or structur- ally altered in an R -2 Residence District on any site, unless a public sanitary sewer is available. e) The density in an R -2 Residence District shall not exceed the maximum density permitted by the land use classification and peo- ple per unit designated in the city's adopted comprehensive plan. Code 1965, § 905.030; Ord. No. 448, § 1, 7- 20 -78; Ord. No. 471, § I 7 -5 -79) Sec. 36 -89. Front yards. Each lot in an R -2 Residence District shall have a front yard of not less than thirty (30) feet in depth facing any street or road. If 9 Attachment Five i fifty (50)' percent or more of the then existing dwellings Having frontages on the same street or road have a predominant front yard setback different from that specified herein, then all buildings there- after erected, altered or moved on that street or road shall conform to that predominant front yard depth, unless a different setback is approved in writing by owners of not less than fifty -one (51) percent of all the then existing buildings on that street or road within three hundred (300) feet of the proposed building location. (Code 1965, § 905.040) j Sec. 36 -90. Side yards. Each lot in an R -2 Residence District shall have two (2) side yards, one on each side of the building. For every building erected or structurally altered, each side yard shall have a width of not less. than five (5) feet. The foregoing requirements for side yards shall be subject to the following modifications: 1) On a corner lot, the side yard on the street side of such corner lot shall have a width of not less than thirty (30) feet. 2) A church or a public, parochial or private school shall have a side yard of not less than fifty (50) feet on each side adjoining other property. 3) When two (2) or more adjoining lots are used as a single building site, the side yard requirements shall apply only to the outside lot lines. (Code 1965, § 905.050) Sec. 36 -91. Rear yards. a) The rear yard for each lot in an R -2 Residence District shall have a depth equal to, or greater than, twenty (20) percent of the depth of the lot. b) The setback for dwelling accessory buildings in an R -2 Resi- dence District shall be not less than five (5) feet from the rear lot line except that on a corner lot, a thirty -foot setback from the street side shall be the minimum. (Code 1965, § 905.060; Ord. No. 487, §§ 904.060, 905.060, 6 -5 -80) Sec. 36 -92. Radio tower, antenna and flagpole setbacks. Citizen band radio towers, amateur radio towers, television an- tennas and flagpoles in an R -2 Residence District shall maintain a five -foot setback from all property lines. (Ord. No. 392, § 2,1- 15 -76) Sec. 36 -93. Building separation requirement. ' In an R -2 Residence District, separation between an accessory structure and a principal structure or another accessory structure shall be in conformance with building code requirements. (Ord. No. 487, § § 904.090 905.080 6 -5 -80) Secs. 36- 94--36 -105. Reserved. 10 ORDINANCE N0, AN REGARDING MINIMUM LOT WIDTHS FOR SMALL- LOT ,' SINGLE DWELLINGS Section 1. Sec. 36 -88 '(c) is amended to read as follows languageunderlinedistobeaddedandlanguagecrossedoutistobedeleted )• c) The minimum lot width in an R -2, residence district forr. l) Single dwellings shall be sixty feet for inteY ( ) er i or lots and eighty -five feet (85) feet for corner lots. 2) Double dwellings shall be i hton-_ , S , o Tom, e g y - f i v e 85) feet for interior lots and one hundred (100) feet for corner lots. Section 2. Section 36 -90. Side yards is amended to read as follows language crossed out is to be deleted and language underlined is tobeadded) : . Each lot in an R -2 residence district shall have two (2)side yards, one on each side of the building, Ever singlegyg anddoubledwellingzide shall have a side yard width of not less than five f 9 For every single dwelling, with less than seventy -five (75) feet of lot width, the total of both side yards shall be at leas fifteen 5) feet, -- The foregoing requirements for side ards shall be subjectY ect to the following modifications: 1) On a corner lot, the side yard on the street side of such corner lot shall have a width of not less than thirty30) feet. 2) A church or public, parochial or private school shall have a side yard of not less than fifty (5 0) feet on each side adjoining other property. 3) When two (2) or more adjoining lots are used as a single building site, the side yard-requirements shall applyppY only to the outside lot lines, Section 3. Sec. 36 -6 Definitions is amended to add the followinglanguage: Lot width: The distance at the building line between side property lines for interior lots and between a side property line and the opposite street right -of -way for corner lots. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. 11 Attachment Six Passed by the Maplewood City Council on , 1985. ' Attest: Mayor City Clerk Ayes- - Nays-- 12 1 is e t MINUTES MAPLEWOOD HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY November 11, 1985 = 1.- Call to Order Chairman.Fischer called the ,meeting •g to .order.. at 7.25 p.m. . 20 Roll'Call Commissioners: Dale Carlson Present Thomas Connelly Present Lorraine Fischer Present Robert Larson Absent Greg Schmit Present HRA /HRC Liaison: Mary Eiden Present C. Code Amendment -- Small -lot, Single-dwellings9 Commissioner Schmit moved and Commissioner Connell secondedy to recommend approval of the proposed ordinance to: (1) reduce the minimum lot width for 7,500 square -foot lots from 75 to 60 feet and (2) require 15 feet of total side andY area for 60-foot wide lots, Motion carried ayes--all, f, it i 1886 November 14, 1985 Mr, Ken Haider Maplewood City Manager City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Haider: Action by Council rb Endorse Modified.,.. Rejected Date For the past seven years the St...Paul Winter Carnival has beenwithoutits1-500 Snowmobile Marathon Race which had been a veryimportantpartoftheWinterCarnivalsince1966. This year wearefortunatetohavetheMarchofDimesSuper400SnowmobileMarathonrideasakick -off event for our Centennial Celebration, We are asking for permission from the city of Maplewood h the M p d to allowthisridetogothroughMaplewoodcity111mits. Please find enclosed a map with the snowmobile route mar this is marked 1nred. If you recall the same route that was used by theWinterCarnival's I -500 race, The Super 400 trails omm' lewood v' c ltteewouldliketogothroughMaP1aLakePhalen, to Round Lake,north to Keller Lake and then to Garvais Lake, The March of Dimes .has individual event insurance that willcoverthisevent. I do not have the specifics on it butWinterCarnivalhaseventinsuranceof $1,000,000 and apolicyof $1,000,000. n umbrella The St. Paul Winter Carnival hopes the City ouncil w'this route for the Super y 111 approve p 400 as we are really looking forward totheirparticipationinthisyear's festival. If ou auestionsyhave anyq , give me a call at 222 -4416. Sincerely, Todd Mariska Program Manager jk Enclosure 339 BREMER BUILDING • SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 • (612) 222 -4416 0 A C 0 N Q' .0 10 F-- WASHINGTON CO. 05,C t C;]R22W X" LINO XILAKESa: 35 61x-'. -7 ..... X.:ST.Ji:: Ri; . . .HUGQ::*110TN ITw.7n'. I" ...... OLCO. RD. f A.S. 6 Poplar 59 • 0 Otter tr i Lake ................ To W Lake A (10)2 III Lake • Lai WilkinsonWilkinn 61 a 5 3 1 31 14 Deep L. 0 4 • 0 rBaldEagle7C35 e• a as a 35X 3 • 36XwiniLAKI 3 X.: ...... 36 4 04 fA3Lake4a0. aIn VAS FAS. Pop. 2846TurtleO-x 7 NORTH OAKS H I T s ~ R -w i Pleas4nt T 7A Black DELL'rnarack Aa hit V % i BeachEALake Lake 0 U MAMMON RD. Q4b ....... 0 59 VT" ST.1 0 4 10 Y .WHITE 24417C. P. III COTTAGSCoIIG-2 13 .... X $IRC"BEAR —T "IsTQbC ------ X-X.X F. ST. a ifTe Uilfillan LAKE 67 ISLAND MANITOU BirchWke ... • : :SHIDRIYIE PX. LakePop. 17, 00 ol U .........................01 ......... X. 66 fil FAU. ...CO. G 0.9 9 CO. X.. A. ............. ..... . .....X.x-0.2F.A. 51 X Lake • h WMITAII ST. 13 Sucker 0 Snail *X. ite '—Bear X.X xX Of Lake Goose A) X-X.52 '*A 223 X 19 X. ake VADNAIS HEIGHTS .......... pop. 3 111 el EIR% O. P Co. Ito. F :.X.:.3 12 'Xx V112r ....RD.Co. F GRAMS11 .. . . .... 70 X Gem 9)10 Lake C CEDAR AVL25 57 X-!+29 27 X K • 2 p'x (27)a- F ';PriebeGEM p LAKE 94X ... ....KOeMI Po. 3 Island A CARDIGAN .10 Lake 52 0icy. 4 Co .:: o 244Lake14 15 2RailroadFA 2A11XFAU. ....ffLakeComers x... . ...9Wabass ILIA St.Vadnais 1 16 Willow " 4.X.W 35 ORCHARD M 35 OWA 33 Mud 17 1 Lake 3 70 2 60Lake x: PAP. F.A.I. .3 `:* ( F 2VI - - .35 0.7 Owasso X . X o— 10 IF T_ oit.T I — COUMPAN11—T X.: T_ NIX. T—T 1—T —T—TC .T T — T . T—T LA X-:- - Xx A, - T V-1—T T—T-4 r T 20 T T , —T—T-7—T o04 X52 jo JV T3 r AVL SilverCLITTLEX CrCANADX-:-:4 WWI(21 X ?102 Lake A Koh aX lis Casey AounX 23 CO. CCX, to. P2321FAU. ke Sava :SAINT RTH 70 XX TT X 49 so T - -----PAULNAOMIAve65 X .Bennett Pop. 14921 lit" AVW_ Lake AP OD7 24M x.Co. Ro. I . • 9 POP. 90 X......4 no PKWY14 PAP.I f _ 1 X.: 03 W Fkp. 11AML I rr 0-:%' WX F.A.. 36 u. 36 u : rn x X.X*- 4 X 6113X 52 Sand L. 53 17ROSeLAWNAVL4- Mccarro 26 Lake X.X .. 35 X X .X:F.A.U. ........ x . X X *X 57 23 ARLINGTON 19 AVE. 64 MOST AVE etntr : X 2 A Wake a Lake RPEIVtEU X F.Au.: ke A&LA X.. 65 21 SOUM AVL 13 a )Ct• fJ z OAF Minnesota Statutes of 1982, Chapter 112.42, Subdivision 3, Watershed Act, pertinent excerpt enclosed) provides that County Commissioners must select watershed district managers from a list of nominees "submitted jointly or severally" by the municipalities that are wholly or partially in the watershed district to the County Board at least 60 days prior to the expiration of the term of office of a manager. If no list is submitted, the County Board will proceed to appoint a manager through its "open appointment' process. This letter is a reminder that the term of Christopher Drake., presently a member of the Ram sey-Washi ngton-M etro Watershed District Board of Mana- gers, will expire on February 23,.1986. Mr. Drake is a resident of Little Canada. If the six affected municipalities listed below wish to submit a list of nominees for consideration by the County Boards your joint or se arate lists should be sentp to me prior to December 23, 1985. Mr. Drake's name may be submitted as a nominee for reappointment. The County Board is then required to act upon an appointment by January 23, 1986. Nominees must be voting esidents and mustg reside within the boundaries of the watershed district. They cannot be Federal, State or County officers. Little Canada Maplewood North St. Paul St. Paul Vadnais Heights White Bear Lake Please let me know if you have any questions about this appointment process. Sincerely yours, Harry E, arshall Chief erk - County Board HEM:sab 461' -'t. + S RR'T:'ri cc: J. Van Houdt, Acting Executive Director; C. Drake; All Commissioners; M. Timmons, Assistant County Attorney; R. Lake, President; Ray Marshall, Attorney — Ramsey /Washington /Metro Watershed District; Attachment Warren W. Schaber District 6 Chairman Diane Ahrens Board of District 4 John T. Finley arose o (112 GOM172.1sS,1612erSDistrict3 Ruby Hunt District 5 Suite 316, Court House, St. Paul, Minnesota 55102HalNorgard District 7 Robert J orth Phone (612) 298 -4145District1 Donald E. Salverda District 2 Richard L Brubacher November 15 1985ExecutiveDirector Barry Evans Action by Council: City Manager City of Maplewood Endorse 1380 Frost Avenue Modifie St. Paul, MN 55109 Re j ecte Date Dear Mr. Evans: Minnesota Statutes of 1982, Chapter 112.42, Subdivision 3, Watershed Act, pertinent excerpt enclosed) provides that County Commissioners must select watershed district managers from a list of nominees "submitted jointly or severally" by the municipalities that are wholly or partially in the watershed district to the County Board at least 60 days prior to the expiration of the term of office of a manager. If no list is submitted, the County Board will proceed to appoint a manager through its "open appointment' process. This letter is a reminder that the term of Christopher Drake., presently a member of the Ram sey-Washi ngton-M etro Watershed District Board of Mana- gers, will expire on February 23,.1986. Mr. Drake is a resident of Little Canada. If the six affected municipalities listed below wish to submit a list of nominees for consideration by the County Boards your joint or se arate lists should be sentp to me prior to December 23, 1985. Mr. Drake's name may be submitted as a nominee for reappointment. The County Board is then required to act upon an appointment by January 23, 1986. Nominees must be voting esidents and mustg reside within the boundaries of the watershed district. They cannot be Federal, State or County officers. Little Canada Maplewood North St. Paul St. Paul Vadnais Heights White Bear Lake Please let me know if you have any questions about this appointment process. Sincerely yours, Harry E, arshall Chief erk - County Board HEM:sab 461' -'t. + S RR'T:'ri cc: J. Van Houdt, Acting Executive Director; C. Drake; All Commissioners; M. Timmons, Assistant County Attorney; R. Lake, President; Ray Marshall, Attorney — Ramsey /Washington /Metro Watershed District; Attachment WATERSHEDS 112.4 In lieu of the individual bo -rids _ on bond or undertaking to be furnished b managers in awatersheddistrict, a schedule or position may g managers of the watershed district g Y given by theorasinQlecorporatesuretyfidelity, schedule orPositionbandorundertakingcv shed distric xnc u .° ° enn all managers and employees of the water.t, 1 ding officers and employees required b lawindividualbondorundertakinc . Q , the res Y to furnish an b law or may be f urnished m pective amounts fined -y y the person or 3. board authorized to fix the amounts .substantially as provided in section 574.1 conditioned ubd. 2. The board of managers shall adopt a seal and shall efarecordofallaficient) keeproceedings, nunutes, certificates, contracts, bonds of iandallotherbusinesstransactedoractiontake is emp oyees be, at all reasonable ti n by the board, which record shall - cries, open to inspection by the prop:rt owners within thedistrict, and all other interested parties,y Subd. 3. At least 30 days nor to the +e .era • the , t manag named b e p do . of theterm os offpf- of thefirstmanegyboard, the county comxnussioners of each coonaffectedshallmeetandproceedtoaointsuccessonominatinetitionthat • ' ' PP n to the first managers.. If the u Sities P t aced to f m a tna'orit ofnthedistifthedistrictisw IbL-holly within the m tan area, county connrnonees• shall a •ant for niana c -ointl or several PPm g rs frorn a hst of ns noudnaYlbthe .. "y y tot and tnun cipali ties within the distric#1st shalt contain .Fast three noncansub ees for each ition to be flledr, it shall . nutted t4 the affeaeted county board at least day .. . _the teen of offices If the list yS prior to the eacpiration cifisnotsubmittedwithin60dayspriortod 'ex}iradon of the t of office the coon commission P from eli *ble indivi commissione shall select the ma madualswithinthedistrict, a count cornrnsssioneast 'betore a ex ire Y e s at a P e l of office of any managers meet andppointthesuccessors. If the district affects more than one county, managers among the counties nty, distributionofthaffectedshallbeasdirectedbtheboard, •Ten years after the order of estRablishment upon petition rF y p p io.. _ }.A , the coun board ofcommissionersofanycountaffectedbthedirt. '_ •hearin thereon m - • y Y 'pct. the board after publicayredistributethemanagersamongthecountiesif ' redistncationisinaccordancewiththe " for the re policy and purposes of this chapter. No petitiondistributionofmanagersshallbefiledwiththeboardmoreoftenthanonceintenyears. The term of office of each manager, ' f the number does notexceedthree, shall be one for a term of one i year, one for a ears.. y term of two years, andoneforatermofthree be for Y If the managers consist of five members, one shallatermofoneyear, two for a term of two years. and two for a toyears. If the board of rnana+ers consists of m r'rn of three sh ail be a ointec[ . ore than five members, thePPsothaasnearlyaspossione -third serve terms of one ear, aone-third serve terms of two years, and one - third serve to y ' district affects more than one terms,* of three years. If the county, the board shall direct the distribution of thebrie, two and three year terries amonc the affected counties. Th..reafter, er be the termofofficeforeachmanagershallforatermofthreeyears, and until hissuccessorisappointedandqualified. If the di: aff fivdertop 9 _ tact affects more than ficounties. in car provide for the ordersr ) ti_ y distribution of the theboardmadetermineanmanagdidentifythemanagerareaswithintheterritoryft cintina cunc beard of hedistrictandselectthear {..._ .. er's are PP } commissioners for each nana-a. any vacancy occurring in an office of a manager shall be f'appointing count board of commis i tiled by theA g Y , s oners. record of all a ointmen madunderthissubcliv ;sign shall be filed with the PP e count} auditor of each count}.affected, with the secretary of the bc:trd of managers •• * water resources board. .and wi..s the secretatti• of .the v e a No person shall be appointed as a manager who is not avotingresidentofthedistrictandnoneshallbLpublicfr °' yi • ov P ' o ficer of the count}:state, or federal -government. prodded that a soil and water conservation 'sor may be a m 3 n ager.