Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1985 08-26 City Council Packet
AGENDA Maplewood cit Council 70r.00 P.M., Monda August 26, 1985 Municipal Administration Bul1din Meetin 85-17 (A) CALL TO ORDER (B) ROLL CALL (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes 85-14, Jul 8, 1985 2. Mi'nutes 85-15, Jul 22, 1935 (D) APPROVAL, OF AGENDA (D) CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent A are consi'dered to be routine b the Cit y Council and will be enacted b one n otion in the form listed below, -There will be no separate on these i'tems. If' discussion .i's- desi-red, that item will be removed from t he Con.sent A and will be consi*dered separatel 1. Accounts Pa 20 Conditional Use Permit Renewal,, 1810 Co. Rd. B 3. Home Occupation Renewal: 2308 Dahl Court 4. Home Occupation Renewal: 1887 M 5. Final Plat: Hi Townhomes 6. Final Plat: Maplewood Hills 2nd Addition 7, Miller & Schroeder Contract for Fi'nanci'al Bond Services (EA-1) -MASAYUKA TAKEDA - PRESENTATION TO CITY' (F) PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P-.M* - Buildin Re- location: Co. Rd, B. (G) AWARD OF BIDS 1. Cit Hall (H) UNFINISHED *BUSINESS 10. Plan Amendment: Harmon School (I) . NEW BUSINESS 10 Code Amendment: Parkin (.2nd Readi-n 2, MTC Bus Route Changes 3. MSAS - Five-Year Plan 4 0 Diseased Trees 59 Co Avenue Improvement Petition (J) VISITOR PRESENTATIONS MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, July 8, 1985 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 85 -14 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood ,Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present MaryLee Maida, Councilmember Absent Charlotte Wasiluk, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes No. 85 -13 (June 24, 1985) Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 85 -13 (June 24, 1985) as submitted. D Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the agenda as amended 1. Farm Use Designation 2. Fourth of July 3. Castle Avenue 4. Commissions 5. High Voltage Study 6. C..D.R.B. 7. Transit Board Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Bastian moved, Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk, Ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda, Items 1 through 5, as recommended; 1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses Check Register dated June 26, 1985 through June 28, 1985 - $375,296.58; Part II - Payroll dated June 25, 1985, Gross amount - $126,615.38) in the amount of $491,801.96. 7/8 2. Budget Changes - Insurance Approved the following budget transfer to cover the cost of insurance contracts: Contingency Unreserved Account Fund Equity $27,770 General Fund 4,080 $24,020 Hydrant Charge Fund 5,940 10,490 V.E.M. Fund $37,790 $34,510 Total 3. Time Extension - Crestview Forest Approved a four year time extension for the planned unit development and for the portion of the preliminary plat designated as Phases 3, 4 and 5 of the Crestview Forest Addition. 4. Time Extension - St. Paul Business Center East Approved the renewal of the Planned Unit Development for the St. Paul Business Center East for one year. 5. Acceptance of Coin Club Donation Accepted a donation of $50.00 from the Maplewood Coin Club towards the purchase of cardtable chairs to be used at the Heritage Center. A letter of appreciation will be sent to the Maplewood Coin Club. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M. IDR Western State Bank a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of WAV, Inc., 1740 Rice Street, for a $2,300,000 Industrial Revenue Note to con- struct an office building. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Mr. Dennis Prchal, representing WAV, Inc. spoke on behalf of the request. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. The following were heard: Mr. George Rossbach, 1405 E. County Road D Mr. Don Bachmeier, St. Paul Business Center e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption , - 2 - 7/8 85 - 7 - 99 RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT UTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT TO THE ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT WHEREAS, (a) The purpose of Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, known as the Minnesota Industrial Development Act (the "Act ") as found and determined by the legislature is to promote the welfare of the state by the active attraction and encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to prevent so far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic un- employment; (b) Factors necessitating the active promotion and development of economically sound industry and commerce are the increasing concentration of population in the metropolitan areas and the rapidly rising increase in the amount and cost of govern- mental services required to meet the needs of the increased population and the need for development of land use which will provide an adequate tax base to finance these increased costs and access to employment opportunities for such population. (c) The City Council of the City of Maplewood (the "City ") has received from WAV Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the "Company ") .a proposal that the City assist in financing a Project hereinafter described, through the issuance of a Revenue Bond or Bonds or a Revenue Note or Notes hereinafter referred to in this resolution as "Revenue Bonds" pursuant to the Act; (d) The City desires to facilitate the selective development of the community, retain and improve the tax base and help to provide the range of services and em- ployment opportunities required by the population; and the Project will assist the City in achieving those objectives. The Project will help to increase assessed valuation of the City and help maintain a positive relationship between assessed valuation and debt and enhance the image and reputation of the community; (e) The Company is currently engaged in the business of ownership, improvement and operation of real estate used by Western State Bank of St. Paul and others. The Project to be financed by -.the Revenue Bonds is an approximately 24,700 square foot three -story commercial bank and office building located at 1740 Rice Street in Maplewood and leased to Western State Bank of St. Paul and consists of the con- struction of buildings and improvements thereon and the installation of equipment therein to be initially owned and operated by the Company, and will result in the employment of additional persons to work within the new facilities; - 3 - 7(8 (f) The City has been advised by representatives of Company that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital cost of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility - of operating the Project would be significantly reduced, but Company has also advised this Council that the Project would not be undertaken but for the availability of industrial bond financing; (g) Pursuant to a resolution of the City Council adopted on June 24, 1985, a. public hearing on the Project was held on July 8, 1985, after notice was published and materials made available for public inspection at the City Hall, all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b at which public hearing all those appearing who so desired to speak were heard; (h) No public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly benefit financially from the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Council hereby gives preliminary approval to the proposal of Company that the City undertake the Project pursuant to the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act ( Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes), consisting of the construction and equipping of an approximately 24,700 square foot three -story commercial bank and office building located at 1740 Rice Street within the City pursuant to Com- pany's specifications suitable for the operations described above to be initially owned and operated by the Company and pursuant to a revenue agreement between the City and Company upon such terms and conditions with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary, so as to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal of and interest on the Revenue Bonds in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $2,300,000 to be issued pursuant to the _Act to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project; and said agreement may also provide for the entire interest. of Company therein to be mort- gaged to the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds; and the City hereby undertakes pre- liminarily to issue its Revenue Bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions; 2. On the basis of information available to this Council it appears, and the Council hereby finds, that the Project constitutes properties, real and personal, used or useful in connection with one or more revenue producing enterprises engaged in any business within the meaning of Subdivision la of purposes stated in Section 474.02 of the Act; that the Project furthers the purposes stated in Section 474.01, Minnesota Statutes;. that the Project would not be undertaken but for the availability of industrial bond financing; that the availability of the financing under the Act and willingness of the City to furnish such financing . will be a substantial inducement to Company to undertake the Project, and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the development of economically sound industry and commerce, to assist in the prevention of the emergence of blighted and marginal land, to help prevent chronic unemployment, to help the City retain and improve the tax base and to provide the range of service and employment opportunities required by the population, to help prevent the movement of talented and educated persons out of the state and to areas within the State where their services may not be as effectively used, to promote more intensive development and use of land within the City and eventually to increase the tax base of the community; - 4 - 7/8 3. The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by the City subject to the approval of the Project by the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority or such other state officer having authority to grant approval (the - "Authority "), and subject to final approval by this Council, Company, and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the ultimate details of the financing of the Project; 4. In accordance with Subdivision 72 of Section 474.01 Minnesota Statutes, the Mayor of the City is hereby authorized and directed to submit the proposal for the Project to the Authority requesting its approval, and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide the Authority with such preliminary information as it may require; 5. Company has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project whether or not the Project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by the Author- ity will be paid by Company; 6. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, is authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Project, to consult with the City Attorney, Company and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms and pro- visions of the Revenue Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary documents and to submit such documents to the Council for final approval; 7. Nothing in this resolution or in the documents prepared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or funds of the City except the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall the City be subject to any liability thereon. The holder of the Revenue Bonds shall never have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the outstanding principal on the Revenue Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City. The Revenue Bonds shall recite in substance that the Revenue Bonds, including interest thereon, is payable solely from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation; 8. In anticipation of the approval by the Authority the issuance of the Revenue Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Project, and in order that com- pletion of the Project will not be unduly delayed when approved, Company is hereby authorized to make such expenditures and advances toward payment of that portion of the costs of the Project to be financed from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds as Company considers necessary, including the use of interim, short -term financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds if and when del- ivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the City; 9. If construction of the Project is not started within one year from the date thereof, this resolution shall thereafter have no force and effect and the preliminary approval herein granted is withdrawn. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this 8th 'day of July, 1985. - 5 7/8 Mayor Attest: Clerk Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. 2. 7:00 P.M. Variance - Maplewood Manor Ayes - all. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Maplewood Manor Health Care Center for approval of a 7.5 foot front setback variance to construct a 7.5 x 23 foot sunroom addition. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. C. Mr. Leon Rotering,.Administrator of Maplewood Maple Manor Health Care Center, spoke on behalf of the proposal. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Player Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85 - 7 - 100 WHEREAS, Leon Rotering of Maplewood Maple Manor Health Care Center applied for a variance for the following- described property: Unplatted lands, the north 330 feet, of the East 300 feet of the West 475 feet of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4, subject to the avenue, Section 17, Township 29, Range 22, City of Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota. This . property is also known as 550 E. Roselawn Avenue, Maplewood; WHEREAS, Section 36- 122(f) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires a thirty -foot front setback; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to reduce the front setback to 22.5 feet, requiring a variance of seven and one -half feet; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on May 22, 1985. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Community Design Review Board on June 25, 1985. The Board recommended to the City Council that said variance be approved. - 6 - 7/8 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on July 8, 1985 to consider this variance. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommend- . ations of the City Staff and Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. Strict enforcement of the code would cause undue hardship, since the building is already at the thirty -foot minimum setback line and there is no other feasible place to construct the addition. 2. The spirit and intent of the ordinance would be met since the addition would not obstruct any sight lines, due to the mature trees on this and adjacent lots. 3. The addition is relatively small compared to the overall building. 4. The canopy already extends into the setback. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 3. 7:10 P.M. Preliminary Plat - Broshears' Addition a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding approval of the Broshears' preliminary plat and approval to rezone the property at the northeast corner of Highwood and McKnight Road from F Farm - residence to R -1, single dwelling. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. C. The Planning Commission report was presented. d. Mr. George Broshears, the owner of the property, spoke on behalf of his requests. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard: Mr. Roger Richer, 2272 Phyllis Court q. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Mayor Greavu moved to table this item until such time as the applicant and his associates further investigate the proposal. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 4. 7:20 P.M., Code Amendment : Parking (1st Reading) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a code amendment of the general parking requirements for commercial multiple dwelling. b. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. - 7 - 7/8 C. Boardmember George Rossbach presented the following Community Design Review Board recommendation: Board Member Rossbach moved the board recommend approval of the proposed amendment to the parking requirements as amended by the board as follows: 1. Section 36 -22 (a) (8) add after "One space for each two (2) Employees" "or 1 space for each 400 square feet of manufacturing use and 1 space for each 1000 square feet of warehousing space, whichever is greater." 2. Eliminate from Section 36 -22 (b) "Parking spaces designated for 'employees only' may be reduced to a minimum width of 8 1/2 feet." 3. Eliminate from Section 36 -22 (d) "Parks and." 4. Section 36 -140 "(i)" should be changed to "(h)" Board Member Peterson seconded Ayes - Board Members Peterson, Rossbach, Deans Nays - Board Member Juker d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. The following were heard: Mr. Tom Zacharias, 305 E. 47th St., New York, New York (Officer of the firm that owns Maplewood Mall) Mr. Henry Nichols, Ramon -Keeys Associates, Consulting engineering for the Maplewood Mall) e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Bastian moved first reading of an ordinance to amend the code regarding general parking requirements for commercial and multiple dwelling Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Mayor Greavu moved an amendment to require two (2) parking spaces per apart- ment unit Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson and Bastian. Nay - Councilmember Wasiluk Voting on original motion including the amendment. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmember Bastian. Nay - Councilmembers Anderson and Wasiluk. - 8 - 7/8 5. 7:30 P.M., Assessment Hearing : McClelland Watermain a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the adoption of the assessment roll for the McClelland Street watermain Project 84 -14. b.. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. C. Assistant Engineer Churck Ahl presented the specifics of the improvement. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard: Mr. Edward Dohua, 206 McClelland Mr. Dennis Johnson, 204 McClelland Mrs. Diane Johnson, 204 McClelland A written objection from David Arnold, 2579 Brookview Drive f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Mayor Greavu moved to reduce the cost per front foot by $5.00 ($39.96 per front foot) and to reduce the footage on Parcel No. 1 to 122.42 feet Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. h. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85 - 7 - 101 RESOLUTION ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the construction of the McClelland Street Water Main as de- scribed in the files of the City Clerk as Project Number 84 -04, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNE- SOTA: 1. Such ,proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall con- stitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be bene- fited by the proposed "improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments ex- tending over a period of 20 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January, 1986, and shall bear interest at the rate of ten (10) percent per annum from - 9 - 7/8 the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1985. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council to re- imburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assess- ments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 4. To the extent that this improvement benefits non - abutting proper- ties which may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not herein as- sessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 429.051, to reimburse the City by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or improve- ments. 5. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 6. 7:40 P.M., Plan Amendment and Rezoning - Highway 61 between County Road C and Highway 36. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposed plan amendment and rezoning of the property on the west side of Highway 61 between County Road C and Highway 36. b. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. C. The Planning Commission recommendation was presented. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard: Mr. William J. Dunn, Attorney representing owners of property on Highway 61 Mr. Dennis Wheller, 967 Connor Mr. Stan Stenson, 2508 Forest Mr. Stanton Allen, 2620 Forest Street Mr. John Wyerman, 955 Brooks Court - 10 - 7/8 f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Anderson moved to table this item for further study Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 7. 7:50 P.M., Plan Amendment and Rezoning : Castle Avenue (Hillcrest) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a plan amendment from RL, residential low density to BW business Warehouse and RM residential medium density and a rezoning from R -1, single family resi- dential and BC business commercial to M -1, light manufacturing and R -2 double dwelling, the property located on the south side of Highway 36 west of Ariel Street. b. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. C. The Planning Commission recommendation was presented. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. The following were heard: Mr. Geoff Jorpe, Attorney representing Hillcrest Development James Pamush, 7 West Golden Lake Road, Circle Pines e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard: Mrs. Marcia Haldren, 1927 E. Cope, read a letter from the area residents opposing the rezoning. (The letter became a permanent part of the record) Mr. Charles Themmes, 1928 Castle Avenue The resident at 1922 Castle Ave. Mr. Pat Haldren, 1927 E. Cope Avenue Mr. Fred Kreitz, 2242 Craig Place Mr. Tom Klaes, 2256 German St. Mrs. Helga Gehrke, 1917 E. Cope Avenue Mrs. Xelma Pitzl, 2060 Highway 36 Mr. Ken Niezgocki, 2271 Hazel St. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Anderson moved to table this item until the meeting of July 22, 1985, to allow for the matter to be brought before a full Council. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. Mayor Greavu moved to waive the Rules of Procedures and discuss Item I -2 at a this time. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. I. NEW BUSINESS 2. Community Design Review Board Appointment. a. Mr. James Kochsiek introduced himself to the Council. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to appoint Mr . Ja Kochsiek to the Community - 11 - 7/8 Design Review Board Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. G. AWARD OF BIDS None. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Ripley Avenue Water Main a. .Manager Evans presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85 - 7 - 102 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the City Council on May 13, 1985, plans and specifications for Ripley Avenue Water Main, Project No. 85 -04, have been prepared by the City Engineer, who has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLE - WOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifi- cations. The advertisement shall be published twice, at least ten days before date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered by the Council at 10:00 a.m., on the 2nd day of August, 1985, at the City Hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, for 50 of the amount of such bid. 3. The City Clerk and City Engineer are hereby authorized and instruc- ted to receive, ppen, and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. The Council will consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at the regular City Council meeting of August 12, 1985. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. I. NEW BUSINESS (Continued) - 1. 'Plan Amendment . Harmony'School a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. - 12 - 7/8 b. Mr. Tony Danna, Attorney representing the developer, Smith Investment Properties, spoke on behalf of the proposal. c. Mr. Robert F. Ackerman, architect for the development, also spoke on behalf of the proposal. d. Mayor Greavu asked if anyone wished to be heard. The following expressed their opinions: Mrs. Delores Ethier, 2205 E. County Road C, presented a letter she had written opposing the development and also a petition from residents of North St. Paul opposing the development. e. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the plan amendment Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. f. Mayor Greavu withdrew his motion. g. Councilmember Bastian moved to table this item until the meeting of 22, 1985, for a full Council to be present Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 3. Tax - Forfieted Properties a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following ten resolutions and moved their adoption 85 - 7 - 103 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has determined that the following- described tax - forfeited land is required for drainage purposes: Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 7, King's Addition to the City of St. Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota, Code Nos. 57- 41500 - 010 -07; 57- 41500- 020 -07, and 57- 41500- 030 -07, WHEREAS, the above acquisition would be consistent within the City's Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proper City officials be and hereby are authorized to make an application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land for drainage purposes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be and hereby is, authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution and application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land in the Office of the Land Commissioner. Adopted this 8th day,of July, 1985. - 13 - 7/8 85 - 7 - 104 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has determined that the following - described tax - forfeited land is required for drainage purposes: Lot 4, Block 7, King's Addition to the City of St. Paul. Code No. 57- 41500- 040 -57. WHEREAS, the above acquisition would be consistent within the City's Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proper City officials be and hereby are authorized to make an application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land for drainage purposes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution and application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land in the Office of the Land Commissioner. Adopted this 8th day of July, 1985. 85 - 7 - 105 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has determined that the following - described tax - forfeited land is required for street and utility purposes: Outlot A, King's Addition to the City of St. Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Code No. 57- 41500 - 010 -09. WHEREAS, the above acquisition would be consistent within the City's Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proper City Officials be and hereby are authorized to make an application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land for street and utility purposes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution and application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land in the Office of the Land Commissioner. Adopted this 8th day of July, 1985. a f. 85 - 7 - 106 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has determined that the following - described tax - forfeited land is required for drainage purposes: Lot 25, Block 3, Maplecrest. Code No. 57- 48900 - 250 -03. - 14 - 7/8 WHEREAS, the above acquisition would be consistent within the City's Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proper City Officials be and hereby are authorized to make an application for conveyance of said tax -. forfeited land for drainage purposes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution and application for conveyance of said -tax- forfeited land in the Office of the Land Commissioner. Adopted this 8th day of July, 1985. 85 - 7 - 107 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has determined that the following - described tax - forfeited land is required for drainage purposes: Vacated street south of the adjoining and following: Part lying Northeasterly of the extended Northeasterly line of Lot 13 and Southwesterly of the extended Northeasterly line of Lot 12 of Lot 10, Block 3, Maplecrest Code No. 57- 48900 - 103 -03. WHEREAS, the above acquisition would be consistent within the City's Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proper City Officials be and hereby are authorized to make an application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land for drainage purposes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution and application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land in the Office of the Land Commissioner. Adopted this 8th day of July, 1985. 85 - 7 - 108 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has determined that the following - described tax - forfeited land is required for street and utility purposes: North 30 feet of Block One, Dearborn Park. Code No. 57- 22000 - 010 -01. WHEREAS, the above acquisition would be consistent within the City's Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proper City Officials be and hereby are authorized to make an application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land for street and utility purposes. - 15 - 7/8 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution and application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land in the Office of the Land Commissioner. Adopted this 8th day of July, 1985. 85 - 7 - 109 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has determined that the following - described tax - forfeited land is required for drainage purposes: Subject to pipeline easement, Lot Seven, Block One, Wakefield Manor, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Code No. 57- 80800 - 070 -01. WHEREAS, the above acquisition would be consistent within the City's Comprehensive Plan. - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proper City officials be and hereby are authorized to make an application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land for drainage purposes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution and application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land in the Office of the Land Commissioner. Adopted this 8th day of July, 1985. 85 - 7 - 110 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has determined that the following- described tax - forfeited land is required for drainage purposes: The North 160 feet of the South 450 feet of the East 300 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 18, Township 29, Range 22. Code No. 57- 01810 - 010 -86. WHEREAS, the above acquisition would be consistent within the City's Comprehensive Plan. _ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proper City Of£icials and hereby are authorized to make an application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land for drainage purposes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution and application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land in the Office of the Land Commissioner; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the balance of the property may be sold. Adopted this 8th day of July, 1985. - 16 - 7/8 85 - 7 - 111 WHEREAS', the Board of County Commissioners of Ramsey County by resolu- tion dated October 15, 1984, classified as nonconservation land, certain land lying within the limits of the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS,, acopy of the classification resolution together with a list of the land classified has been submitted for approval of the classification in accordance With Minnesota Statutes Annotated, Section 282.01, sub. 1; and WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has determined that the following- - described tax - forfeited land is required for drainage purposes; Outlet A,. Maple Greens let Addition, Code. No. 57 =04. WHEREAS, the above acquisition would be consistent within the Cityls Comprehensive Plan, NOWT THEREIFORE�, -BE. IT RESOLVED, that said classification of the above- described land as. nonconservation land is hereby approved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the proper City Officials be and hereby Are authorized to make an application for conveyance of Outlot A, Maple Greens 1st Addition for drainage purposes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified - -copy of this resolution and application for conveyance of said tax- forfeited land in the Office of the Land Commissioner. Adopted this. 8th day of July, 1985, 85- 7 -112 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Ramsey County by Resolu- ti;on dated October 15, 1984, classified as nonconservation land, certain land lying within the limits of the City of MaplewoodF and WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has determined that retention of Outlet C Maple Greens 1st Addition (Code No. 57- 48950- 016 -06) would not serve a public purpose, it does not comply with the requirements for development and should be combined with adjoining developed properties for side and rear yard usage, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said classification of the above� described land as nonconservation land is hereby approvedF and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the above described parcel be withheld from sale by auctionfor - one year, during which time the Maplewood Housing and Redevelopment Authority will pursue the enactment of a tax - -forfeit land transfer program to dispose of substandard parcels to adjoining property owners. ,Seconded by CouncilmemberAnderson.. Ayes all, - 17 - 7/8 4. Code Amendment ; M =1 &M -2 District (15t Reading)_ a. Manager Evans presented the Staff_ report, b. Councilmember- Bastian moved first reading ofan - ordinanceamending the code to increase the distance from a - residential - district that a conditional use permit is - requiredfor - buildinginan M- 1, light manufacturing or M-2 heavy manufacturing district Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all, 5. Cable T,V, - Joint Powers Agreement, a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved, its adoption 85 - 7 - 113 BE IT RESOLVED, that Article VI, Section 4 of the JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT OF THE RAMSEY/WASHINGTON COUNTIES SUBURBAN CABLE - COMMISSION be amended as follows: Section 4. Treasurer The Treasurer ` shall have custody of the Commis- sion's funds, shall pay its bills, shall keep its financial records and generally conduct the financial affairs of the Commission and for such other matters shall be delegated to him by the Commission. In conducting the Commission's financial affairs, the Treasurer shall, at all times, act in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Treasurer'are- ports, including any bills or claims to be acted upon by the Commission, shall be distributed to all directors not less than five (5) days prior to the meeting.. The Treasurer shall post a fidelity bond or other insurance in an amount approved by the Commission, The Commission shall bear the cost of the bond or insurance. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all, 6 M.H,F.A. - Resolution a, Manager Evans presented the Staff report,; b.- Councilmember Bastian introduced 'the °following resolution and moved its adoption: a .. 85 7 114 REQUESTING THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL HRA TO APPLY FOR AND IMPLEMENT A REHABILITATION LOAN PROGRAM WITHIN THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood desires to assist low income homeowners in making repairs to their homes for the purpose of correcting defects af- fecting directly the - safety, habitability, energy conservation, or accessi- bility of the - property; and, - 18 - 7/8 WHEREAS, the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency has funds to be used for such purposes, and will accept applications from housing and redevelopment authorities desiring to administer these Rehabilitation Loan Program funds; and, WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has been duly organized pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1976, Section 473.123 and has all of the powers and duties of a housing and redevelopment authority pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1976, 473..193 under the provisions of the Municipal Housing and Redevelopment Act, Minnesota Statutes 1976, Sections 462.411 to 462.711; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Metropolitan Council is hereby requested to include the City of Maplewood in an application for state Re- habilitation Loan Program funds, and that the City Manager, Barry Evans, is hereby authorized to enter into any necessary agreement with the Metropolitan Council for operating the Program within the City. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 7. Countryview Golf Course - Agreement. a, Manager Evans presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson authorized entering into an agreement with Coun- tryViewGolf- Courseinvolving - payingone -half the bill for placement of the nets on the golf course subject - tothe - City receiving a release from any further liability for the construction of Beam Aven and the City obtainin an agreement for full settlement as to - any - costsof Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all, 8,. Wesson Estate a. Manager Evans stated the attorneys handling the Wesson Estate have re- questeda compromise regarding the delinquent taxes and assessments levied against the property onthe - northwest corner of White Bear and Grevais'Avenues,. b. No action taken at this time, 9. Greenbrier Home, Inc, a• Manager Evans stated he had received letter from the Greenbrier Home, Inc „ requesting to speak before the Council regarding their proposal to open a group home for autistic adults in Maplewood.. b. No action taken,at this time. S. VISITOR PRESENTATION 1, Mike Mulroni, Broshear's Addition - 19 - 7/8 a. Mr. Mulroni stated he missed the public hearing regarding Broshear's Addition and wishes Council to consider his request for two lots on McKnight - Road. b. No action taken. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Farm Use Designation a. Councilmember Anderson requested a change from the zoning term F -Farm to F -Farm Residential so it isn't so confusing. b. No action taken. 2. 4th of July a. Councilmember Anderson requested Staff to send a letter of appreciation to everyone responsible for the fireworks. b. Staff to handle. 3. Castle Avenue a. Councilmember Anderson questioned if Castle Avenue could be renamed. b. No action taken. -- 4. Commissions a. Councilmember Anderson stated Council should continue to donate $10.00 per member per month for a commission appreciation dinner. b. No action taken. 5. High Voltage Study a. Councilmember Bastian stated we have a high voltage line that cuts through downtown Maplewood. There is a problem with this and wishes to have a study to see what surrounding communities are doing about this. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Community Block Grant a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. He further stated there will be another meeting Wednesday night if anyone wishes to attend. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to approve the agreement as presented for the Community Black Grant Program. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 2. -Transit Board a... Councilmember. Anderson - moved - . tosupport the candidate recommended by N ew Brighton for the Transit Board. - 20 - 7/8 Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. M. ADJOURNMENT 11:20 P.M. City Clerk - 21 - 7/8 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, July 22, 1985 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting 85 -15 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present MaryLee Maida, Councilmember Present Charlotte Wasiluk, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. Commissioners' Party 2. 36th and Ariel 3. White Bear Avenue Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Anderson moved, seconded by Councilmember Maida, Ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda, Items 1 through 4, as recommended: 1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses, Check register dated July 11, 1985, through July 12, 1985 - $259,625.70 : Part II, Pay- roll Check Register dated 7- 10 -85, gross amount $127,891.21) in the amount of $387,616.91. 2. Budget Transfer,- Beam Avenue Approved a budget transfer in the amount of $4,843.25 from the General Fund Contingency Account to cover the cost of installation of screens at Country View Golf Course to protect Beam Avenue from flying golf balls. 7/22 3. Century Center - Accident Report No action taken. Report stated on November 26, 1984 Council omitted the condition that the driveway on 705 No. Century be limited to right turn exits only. Chief Collins reported that there have not been any accidents because of this access. 4. Final Plat- Westwinds of Maplewood Approved the Westwinds of .Iplewood final plat to create four multiple dwelling lots. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M. Plan Amendment : Harmony School (Continuation) a. Mayor Greavu stated this hearing was continued from the July 8, 1985, meeting. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. C. Councilmember Bastian moved to re -open the public hearing for limited testimony Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Wasiluk, Nay - Councilmember Maida. d. The following persons expressed their views: Ms. Delores Ethier, 2045 E. 17th Ave., No. St. Paul, reported on a meeting with the developer. Also stated she had a petition from ball players using Harmony School ball fields opposing the proposal. Mr. Bob Ackerman, Architect for the developer Ms. Peg Koneczny, 2026 17th Avenue, No. St. Paul Mr. Brett Smith, 4045 Hodgson Road, the developer Ms..Linda LaPitts, 2005 E. County Road C. Mr. Russ Smith, White Bear Lake e. Mayor Greavu moved the plan amendment OS and S to LSC, RH and RM. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmember Maida Nays - Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Wasiluk. 2. 7:00 P.M., Code Amendment : M -1 and M -2 Districts (2nd Reading) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding second read- ing of an ordinance amending the code to increase the distance from a residential district that a conditional use permit is required for building in an M -1, light manufacturing or M -2, heavy manufacturing district. b. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. - 2 - 7/22 C. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.. d, Mayor Greavu called for opponents, None were heard,. e, Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. f, Mayor Greavu introduced - the - following ordinance and moved its adoption ORDINANCE NO, 584 AN 0RDINANCE INCREASING THE DISTANCE FROM A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IN AN M -1 OR M -2 DISTRICT Section 1.. Section 36- 187(b) of the M-1 district is amended as follows: (b) No building or exterior - use,except parking, may be erected, altered or conducted within 350 feet of a residential district without a conditional use permit,. Section 2, Section 36 -202 of the M-2 district is amended as follows: Section 36-202, Minimum distances for building and use from a residential district, No building or exterior use, except parking, may be erected, altered or conducted Within 350 feet of a residential district without a conditional use permit, Section 3, This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication.. Passed by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this 22nd day of July, 1985, Mayor ATTEST; City Clerk Ayes 5 Nays - 0 Seconded by CouncilmemberMaida.. Ayes - all. i .. 3, 7 :10 P.M,, Tax Exempt Financing - Maple Ridge Estates a, Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Maple Ridge General Partnership for preliminary approval of a $5..5 million tax exempt mortgage revenue bond program to construct a 186 unit rental house complex and to amend the CityTs housing bond plan to include this financing ' program.. - 3 - 7/22 b. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. C. Lorraine Fischer presented the HRA report. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. The following were heard: Mr. Jim Gabler, Maple Ridge General Partnership Mr. Doug Dahms, Project Engineer e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following voiced their opinion and asked questions. Mrs. Judy Englebretson, representing her mother, Mrs. Albert Lepsche f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g.. Councilmember Maida moved to amend the City's housing bond this financing program and introduced the following resolution adoption 85 - 7 - 115 RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A FINANCING PROGRAM FOR A MULTI - FAMILY RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT AND THE PROGRAM, AND THE AMENDMENT OF THE HOUSING REVENUE BOND PROGRAMS PORTION OF THE CITY'S 462C HOUSING PLAN TO INCLUDE THE PROGRAM PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C, AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD TO ISSUE HOUSING REVENUE BONDS AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF THE FINANCING PROGRAM FOR THE PROJECT FOR APPROVAL TO THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE SAID PROJECT AND PROGRAM (MAPLE RIDGE PARTNERSHIP PROJECT) WHEREAS, (a) Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C (the "Act "), confers upon cities a the power to issue revenue bonds to finance a program to issue revenue bonds to finance a program for the purposes of planning, administering, making or purchasing loans with respect to one or more multi - family housing developments within the boundaries of the City; is - 4 - 7/22 (b) The City has received from a limited or general partnership to be formed with Maple Ridge Development Corporation, a Minnesota corpora- tion, as a general partner (the "Developer "), a proposal that the City undertake a program to finance a Project hereinafter described, through the issuance of revenue bonds or obligations (in one or more series or which may be in the form of a single debt instrument) (the "Bonds ") pursuant to the Act; (c) The City desires to: facilitate the development of rental housing within the community; encourage the development of affordable housing opportunities for residents of the City; encourage the development of housing facilities designed for occupancy by persons of low or mode- rate income; and encourage the development of blighted or underutilized land and structures within the boundaries of the City; and the Project will assist the City in achieving these objectives; (d) The City desires to expand the "Housing Revenue Bond Programs" portion of its 462C Housing Plan to incorporate the program for the Project; (e) The Developer is currently engaged in the business of providing rental housing. The Project to be financed by the Bonds is the construction and equipping of six _(6) buildings (with clubhouse and pool) containing approximately 186 rental units, anticipated to consist of 54 one- bedroom units and 132 two- bedroom units, located in the southwest section of the intersection of Stillwater Road and Stillwater Avenue in the City, which will result in the provision of additional rental housing opportunities to persons within the community; (f) The City has been advised by the Developer that conventional, commercial financing to .pay the capital costs of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasi- bility of operating the Project would be significantly reduced, but the Developer has also advised the City that with the aid of municipal finan- cing, and resulting low borrowing costs, the Project is economically more feasible; (g) A public hearing on the Project, the financing program and the amendment of the "Housing Revenue Bond Programs" portion of the City's 462C Housing .Plan therefor was held on July 22, 1985, by the Maplewood City Council after notice was published, all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.05, Subd. 5, at which public hearing all those appearing at said hearing who desired to speak were heard;. (h) No public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly benefit financially from the Project. (i) The City has received a report from a qualified real estate marketing analyst showing (I) that the Project will not have a negative impact on vacancy rates of existing multiple dwellings in the City and (II) the development will be able to comply with the federal law and moderate income requirements over the life of the bond issue. - 5 - 7/22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City hereby gives preliminary . approval to the proposal of the Developer that the City undertake the Project,d €scribed above, and the program of financing therefor, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, consisting of the construction and equipping of multi- family rental housing facilities within the City pursuant to the Developer's specifications and to a revenue agreement be- tween the City and the Developer on such terms and conditions, with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary, so as to produce income and revenues suf- ficient to pay, when due, the principal and interest on the Bonds in a total princi- pal amount of approximately $5,500,000.00 to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the construction and equipping of the Project; and said agreement may also provide for the entire interest of the Developer therein to be mortgaged to the pur- chaser or purchasers of the Bonds,, or a trustee for the holder(s) of the Bonds; and the City hereby undertakes preliminarily to issue its bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions; 2. The "Housing Revenue Bond Programs" portion of the City's 462C Housing Plan as herein proposed to be amended is hereby approved and adopted and the .City Clerk is authorized and directed to submit the amended 462C housing Plan to the Metropolitan Council for its review and comment. The comments of the Metropolitan Council, if any, shall be submitted to the City Council for its consideration; 3. At the option of the Developer, the financing may be structured so as to take advantage of whatever means are available and are permitted by law to enhance the security for, or marketability of, the Bonds; Provided that any such financing structure must be approved by the City; 4. On the basis of information available to the City, it appears, and the City hereby finds, that the Project constitutes a multi - family housing development within the meaning of Subdivision 5 of Section 462C.02 of the Act; that the Project will be primarily occupied, in part, by persons of low or moderate income; that the availa- bility of the financing under the Act and the willingness of the City to provide such financing will be a substantial inducement to the Developer to undertake the Project, and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the provision of additional multi- family rental housing opportunities to residents of the City, to assist in the prevention of the emergence of blighted and marginal land and to promote more intensive development and use of land within the City; 5. The Project, and the program to finance the Project by the issuance of revenue bonds, is hereby given preliminary approval by the City subject to the ap- proval of the financing program by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (the "MHFA ") and subject to final approval by the City, the Developer and the purchasers of the Bonds as to ultimate details of the financing of the Project; 6. In accordance with Subdivision 5 of Section 462C.05, Minnesota Statutes, the Mayor of the City is hereby authorized and directed to submit the program for financing the Project to the MHFA, requesting its approval, and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide the MHFA with preliminary information as it may require; - 6 - 7/22 7. The Developer has -- agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all costs incur -red by the City in connection with the financing of the Project, Whether or not the Project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by MHFA,Will be paid by the - Developer- 8, Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, is authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Project and the financing program therefor, to consult with the City Attorney, the - City`s fiscal consultant,Developer - and purchaser of the Bonds (or trustee for the Purchasers of the Bonds) as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms and provisions of the Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary documents and submit such documents to the City for final approval; 9. Nothing in this resolution - orthedocuments prepared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose. The Bonds shall not constitute a charge,lienor encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or funds-of - the - City - except the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall the City be subject to any liability thereon. The holder or holders of the Bonds shall never have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power - o£ the City to pay the outstanding principal on the Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereon against any property of the City. The bonds shall recite in substance that the bonds, including the interest thereon, are payable solely from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof. The Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any consti- tutional or statutory limitation; 10, In anticipationof - theapprova,l of - theMHFA and the issuance of the Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Project, and, in order that completion of the project will not beunduly delayed when approved, the Developer is hereby authorized to make such expenditures and advances toward payment of that portion of the costs of the Project to be financed from the proceeds ofthe - Bonds, as the Developer con- siders neces -sary, including the use of interim, short -term financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Bonds, if any, when delivered, but otherwise Without liability on the part of the City; 11,. If construction of the Project is not started within one year from the date hereof,, this resolution shall thereafter have no force and effect and the preliminary approval herein granted is withdrawn; 12, The actions of the City Clerk in causing public notice of the public hear- ing and in describing thegeneralnature ofthe Project and estimating. the princi- pal amount of the Bonds to be issued to finance the Project is in all respects ratified and confirmed. Adopted by the City'Council o� the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this 22nd day of July, 1985. Seconded by CouncilmemberWasiluk, Ayes- all, 4, 7;20 P,M <, Tax Exampt ; Century Ridge. Apartments a, Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Lexington Investment Company for preliminary approval of a $3,75 million tax exempt mortgage revenue bond program to construct an 81 unit rental housing complex and to amend the City's housing bond plan - 7 - 7/22 to include this financing program. b. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. C. Lorraine Fischer presented the BRA report. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. The following were heard: Mr. Greg Bailey, Lexington Investment Company Mr. James Rutzick, Lexington Investment Company e. Mayor Greavu moved to table this item to allow Staff to investigate future plans for Century Avenue Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 5. 7:20 P.M., Variance : White Bear Avenue - Edina Realty. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the re- quest of Edina Realty for approval of a variance to reduce the width of the re- quired landscaped area. b. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. C. Director of Community Development Olson presented the Community Design Review Board recommendation. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Bastian moved to table this item until such time as the applicant attends the meeting Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. G. AWARD OF BIDS None. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Plan Amendment & Rezoning : Highway 36 - Cope Avenue (Hillcrest) a a. Mayor Greavu stated this matter was continued from the July 8, 1985 Council meeting. b. Mrs. Marcia Haldron, 1927 Cope Avenue, expressed her views regarding the rezoning of the Hillcrest property. C. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption - 8 - 7/22 85 - 7 - 116 -- WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is considering an amendment to the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan from RL, residential low density to BW, business warehouse and RM, residential medium density for the property bounded by Highway 36, North St. Paul and Cope Avenue. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. This plan amendment was initiated by Hillcrest Development and the City of Maplewood. 2. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 20, 1983 and June 17, 1985 to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said plan amendment be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council did not approve said plan amendment on July 11, 1983. 4. District court, on May 14, 1985, voided the Council action and ordered the City to amend the plan as proposed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the plan designations for the following areas be changed as follows: 1. The area bounded by Highway 36, North St. Paul, the south line of Block 11, Lots 1 through 15 and Block 10, Lots 1 through 5, and the west line of the east half of Block 7, Lot 26 and Block 10, Lot 5 shall be changed from RL to BW, business warehousing. 2. Block 10, Lots 28 through 30 and Block 11, Lots 16 through 22 and 27 through 30 shall be changed from RL to RM, residential medium density. Approval is based on the district court's order. Seconded by Councilmember Maids. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Bastian, Maida and Wasiluk Nay - Councilmember Anderson d. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85- 7- 117 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated the following rezonings: 1. From R -1, single dwelling residential and BC, business commercial to M -1, light manufacturing: Lot 6; Lot 1 - 15, Block 11; Lot 1 - 4 and the East half of Lot 5, Block 10; and Lots 27 - 30 and the East half of Lot - 9 - 7/22 26�, all in Dearborn Park, - Section 11, Township 29, Range 22. 2.. From R -1 and BC to R -2 double dwelling: Lots 16 - 30, Block 11 and Lots 27- 30 and the East half of Lot 26, Dearborn Park, Section 11, Township 29, Range 22. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter - 36,Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on Tune17, 1985 -,,- The Planning commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 3, The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on O'uly 22, 1985, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements, The e Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. _ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2, The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the useofneighboring property or from the character of the neigh borhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area in- cluded in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.. 3, The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The ]proposed change would have no negative effect u the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. 5. The previous rezoning to R -1 was voided by district court. 6. Rezohings, compatible with the plan amendments are required by the court and state law., 7. The proposed zonings are the most compatible with the court - ordered plan amendments. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Bastian, Maida and Wasiluk Nay - Councilmember Anderson - 10 - 7/22 2. Preliminary Plat & Rezoning - Broshears' Addition a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. This item was tabled from the July 8, 1985, meeting. b. Michial Mularoni, one of the applicants, spoke on behalf of the proposal. C. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85 - 7 - 118 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F, farm resi- dence to R-1, resident district (single dwelling) for the following- described property: The Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, except the east 197.00 feet thereof, also except the South 168.00 feet of the West 175.00 feet thereof. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on June 17, 1985. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on July 22, 1985, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written state- ments. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY .COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring :property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safe- guarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facili- ties, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. - 11 - 7/22 Seconded by Mayor Greavu, Ayes - all,. d, Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the BroshearEO Addition Prelimi- nary Plat subject to the following; 1. Entering into a development agreement with required surety for the public improvements and driveway turn - around for Lots 1 and 2 of the lst Addition prior to final plat approval.. This agree- ment shall include, but not belimited - to, the following require- ments; a, Granting of an easement and construction of a temporary cul-de-sac at the - east - -end of Valley View Drive if the con struation - of - -this street has not been secured in the Leonard's Oak Hills No. 5 Addition, b, - Removal of the silo, barbed wire fencing and other miscel- laneous equipment from the former farmstead, prior to release of the surety, 2, Approval of -a final grading, utility and drainage plans, The grade . and location of Valley View Drive shall be consistent with that pro- posed for Valley View Drive in Leonard's Oak Hills No, 5 Addition. 3, The portion of the site to be platted as the second addition shall be designated as Outlot "A in the first addition plat or the Valley View Drive rghtr-of -way must be dedicated as part of the first addition plat,. Seconded by Mayor Greavu, Ayes- all 3, Code ,Amendment ; Parking (Reconsideration) a,. COuncilmember Anderson moved reconsideration of the regarding the parking code amendment and placed it on 't: 8 enda, Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes -- all.. CouncilmemberBastian - moved to - waiyethe. Rulesof Proce Visitor Presentations, at this time, Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all,. J, VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1, Mr, Otto, Junction a 12 a, Mr.. Otto is again requesting the City to help with his drainage problem. b, Councilmember Andersonstated he .will investigate the situation, NEVd BUSI,NESS 1, Plan Review Maple Ridge Square J - 12 - 7/22 a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Maida moved to approve the plans for a 108,706 square foot retail sh000ina center and Rainbow Foods amcery store to he located at the northwest corner of White Bear and Gervais Avenues subject to the following 1. Approval of ,plans by the Community Design Review Board does not constitute approval of a building permit. 2. All trash dumpsters shall be stored in screening enclosures with a 100% opaque wooden gate according to ordinance. 3. Any exterior building or roof -top equipment shall be decoratively screened and hidden from view. The screening material is subject to Staff approval. 4. An erosion control plan, acceptable to the City Engineer, shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit for erosion control during construction. 5. Parking areas shall be striped and all bituminous areas shall have continuous concrete curbing. Parking lots shall be kept in a con- tinual state of repair. 6. The site plan shall be revised to provide: a. Parking stalls that measure 9 by 19 feet, unless they abut a curb or sidewalk, in which case they may be 9 by 18 feet. b. Narrowing of the easterly driveway on Gervais Avenue from 50 feet to 32 feet. 7. If construction has not begun within two years of approval, Board . review shall be repeated. 8. Site security lighting shall be provided and shall be directed or shielded so not to cause any undue glare onto adjacent properties or roadways. 9. If any adjacent property is disturbed or property irons removed due to construction of the site, that property shall be restored and irons replaced by the applicant. 10. Grading, drainage and utility plans shall be subject to the City Engineer's approval. 11. The applicant shall sign a hold- harmless agreement with the City because of the driveway constructed over the sanitary sewer ease- ment, subject to the approval of the City Attorney. 12. The applicant shall dedicate a drainage easement over the tri- angular area at the westerly side of the site. - 13 - 7/22 13. All required landscape areas shall be continually and properly maintained. 14. All required plant materials that die shall be replaced by the owner within one year. 15. The landscaping plan shall be revised for Staff approval to: a. Eliminate the berms within 50 feet of the White Bear Avenue access. b. Provide evergreen trees of a pine or spruce variety north of the retail building instead of the deciduous trees proposed. Six additional trees shall also be added for extra screening of the back side of the building. C. This same evergreen planting scheme shall be followed on the west side of Rainbow Foods, in the same quantity. d. All evergreen trees shall be at least two inches B and B as proposed in the planting schedule. 16. Stop signs shall be provided at all exits. 17. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs and fire hydrants shall be provided in areas subject to the fire marshal's approval. 18. The applicant shall provide a detached sidewalk or trail along the Gervais Avenue right -of -way, according to the specifications of the Director of Community Services. 19. A comprehensive signage plan shall be submitted for approval by the Board. 20. An access permit must be obtained from Ramsey County for the White Bear Avenue access. 21. The applicant shall provide a monetary guarantee, in a form acceptable to Staff, in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of any site im- provements that are not completed by occupancy. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 2. Older Adult Home Share Program a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85 - 7 - 119 RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO PARTICIPATE 'HOME SHARE PILOT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Older Adult Home -Share Task Force was established in October, 1984, to study the need for a home -share housing program; - 14 - 7/22 WHEREAS, the study area included the jurisdictions of the White Bear Lake, Roseville and North St. Paul - Maplewood- Oakdale School Districts; WHEREAS, the task force membership is multijurisdictional, including but not limited to representatives of city government, school district, managers of seniors' residences, senior health care providers and senior counseling services from within the study area; WHEREAS, in January, 1985, the Maplewood City Council authorized $1297.00 for a needs assessment of which $1249.00 was expended; WHEREAS, the results of the needs assessment indicate that approximately 2500 older adults in the study area would be expected to participate in a home -share program as an alternative to having to move from their homes; WHEREAS, no program currently exists that can serve the estimated demand in the study area; WHEREAS, a three -year pilot expansion of Lutheran Social Services' Share - A -Home program would be the most cost- effective means of assessing the need for a long -term program; WHEREAS, the cost of administering a program for the study area from Janu- ary 1, 1986 to December 31, 1986, would be $11,397.00; WHEREAS, the task force is hereby requesting that each of the eleven study area communities contribute to the financing of a pilot home -share program for 1986, on the basis of their 1980 older adult population, as follows: Community Falcon Heights Hugo Lauderdale Little Canada Maplewood North St. Paul Oakdale Roseville Vadnais Heights White Bear Township White Bear Lake % of Study Area's Requested Older Adult Population Contribution 5.3 $ 670.00 1.7 215.00 1.6 202.00 5.0 632.00 21.0 2,656.00 8.2 1,037.00 5.0 632.00 33.6 4,249.00 2.0 253.00 2.9 367.00 13.7 1,733.00 100% $ 12,646.00 WHEREAS, funding for the gecond and third years of the pilot program will be requested of the affected communities in June of 1986, and in June of 1987; WHEREAS, supplemental funding will be sought to reduce the costs to be borne by the participating communities. - 15 - 7/22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood intends to participate in the Older Adult Home -Share Program from January 1, 1986, to December 31, 1986, for a cost not to exceed $2656.00. Said expenditure will be included in the City's Budget for 1986. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 3. Tax Exempt Financing Fee Revision a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson moved to refer this matter to Staff for further investigation. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 4. Maplewood Community Education Advisory Committee a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to appoint Mrs. Rita Janisch ttee. 's Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. C. The Council requested quarterly reports be submitted. 5. Municipal Legislature Commission a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson moved to appoint Councilmember Charlotte Wasiluk to the Board of Directors of the Municipal Legislative Commission. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 6. Civil Service Commission a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. b. Mayor Greavu moved to appoint Steven Gunn to fill the vacancy on the Police Civil Service Commission Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 7. Department of Parks,and Recreation a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 85 - 7 - 120 BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Maplewood that the name of the Department of Community Services be changed to the Department of Parks and Recreation. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. - 16 - Ayes - all, 7/22 VISITO PRESENTATIONS (Continued) 1. Century East - Businesses a. Several leasees of the Century East Shopping Center informed the Council of the many problems occurring with the building and the owner. b. Council requested a complete review. 2. Mr. Gene Wilson a. Mr. Wilson requested that the City use the 1980 census data for the density for the apartment code instead of the 1970 census data. b. Staff stated they are working on this item. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Commission Party a. Councilmember Anderson stated he felt recognition should be given to the commission and board members. b. Staff to investigate. 2. Area of 36 and Ariel a. Councilmember Anderson stated they are.closing the median. on Highway 36 in the area of Ariel Street. .People . are using an access to 36 that is not an approved one and this could be dangerous. He suggested the Highway Depart- ment be notified. b. No action taken. 3. White Bear Avenue a. Councilmember Bastian requested the County be invited to attend a Council Meeting to explain the progress of White Bear Avenue b. Staff will handle. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS None. 3 M. ADJOURNMENT 10:26 P.M. City Clerk - 17 - 7/22 Y a r MEMORANDUM TO: City-Manager ' FROM • Thomas.- Ekstrand-- Associ ate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Renewal LOCATION: 1810 East County Road B APPLICANT /OWNER: Roger . R. Fulk PROJECT: �'' eti.. Fulk Manufacturing, Inc. DATE: August 14, 1985 radar e S M odified UMMARY ...,.,�.,.,�..r. Rej ected Request Pate Renewal of the cond use ermit f Fulk Manufacturing, P Inc . to locate an M-1 use within 350 feet of a residential zone. Comments Once the building is completed, all conditi will be met. The applicant is showing progress in the completion of his building and the site work. Recommendation Adoption of the resolution on a e 7 for o ' p g one year, renewing the conditional use permit for Fulk Manufacturing, so that council may review the status of condition compliance. Y t BACKGROUND Sit Description 1. Lot area: residential site- --1.21 acres, .shop site--- 22,50 square feet. Total .1:73 acres 2. Ex.isti,ng land:;use: single dwelling and garage, on the residential portion of the appl i ant'.s lot and a sheet metal shop on the industrial portion Surround ing Land Uses North: undeveloped; zoned BC, . business commercial and R--3 multiple ► p dwelling; designated for SC, service commercial and RM, residential medium density South,: city's storm water storage pond East: city's public works facility access drive West: single -- family home and Kinney Shoe store Past Action 9- 10 --79: Council rezoned the applicant's shop site from F, farm residential to M -1, light manufacturing. Council also approved a CUP for the. first .shop building. 2r- 13 --84: Council rezoned the remainder of the applicant's property from F to M- 1, approved a five -foot setback variance. for the newest building and approved a CUP for this new building. The CUP approval was subject to: 1. The hours of operation shall generally be between 8 a.m, and 5 P *Me 2. All equipment and machinery shall be stored indoors. 3. All fire safety regulations shall be met. 4. All junk vehicles and any other miscellaneous debris shall be removed from the premises. 5. This permit shall be reviewed in one year , from the date of this approval. 2 a 4 --8 -85 Counc i 1 renewed the CUP f or three months and approved a change ' PP ge in the hours of operation to 7 a.m, to 5 p.m. Council also specified that the site plan ' dated January 6, 1984 shall be adhered to . .. , unless the review .bo and approves a change. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 1. Land Use Plan designation: SC, service commercial 2. Zoning: M--1 30 Section 36 --187 b No building ' C ) g or exterior use, except parking , shall be erected, altered or conducted within 350 feet of a residential district without a conditional use ' permit. 4. Section 36-442(e): All conditional use permits shall be reviewed by the council within one year of the date of initial approval, unless such review is waived by council decision or ordinance. At the one- year: review, the council may specify an indefinite term or specific term, not to exceed five (5) years, for subsequent reviews. The council may impose new or additional conditions ' upon the .,permit at the time of the initial or subsequent reviews. mb Attachments: 10 Location Map 29 Property Line /Zoning Map 30' Site Plan 3 AV E V AVE. KOHLMAN AV. AD C L > ::� EDG z EHILL RD. vi w J 65 DEMONT ta. AV E. x t I 0 go AV 11 to AVE SEAJAJINJ AM V E. 10 VA I RVAI AV 0 LANOV COURT 3 11YIKIN F-0 R. ASTLE AVIL DE QuC cc PE L A LARK AVE.] LARK A VE. [LAURIE R =0. Ito z a: [LAURIE I 49 44 --- I J, 2 z 1: [-SA z CD L Z A^ !iE TX -- 7 cc AVE, su KE p ELDRIOG AVE. IMELMON1 j AVE. ki • N 64 40 AVE. HA FUS ROS Fw-0 0 0 RY JANIU 4 Jam, z 0 4 Ck su R J1 WIF1 4 ni t Wakefield Cr. (z o > 49 44 D Loh e 2 09 OP A� E it z z k) R I -.AV r�r�r�ir x nnnr LOCATION MAP' Attachment I COPE AVE. .�� �% lu-wx w W < > • i (2 r--j PUBLIC OIL 000 RKS tl (Z9 �r� . 28 J, 0 4 4 IL UT 1 - 7 r -X:X�X. Ki nne . ..... 1850 , Shoe Xm* cl 1 3 . 4, X, FULK MANUFACTURING, INC. U3 0 0� ENNE■■ ■ME 7 42- zk c 7 pow a —N —N �, � � � � � � � � � III __.... -- _. .... _ _, I...... _.� � _.... _. ... . C PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 5 Attachment 2 �[ f 1 f � � r r . � � ♦ t.�s..� ,ter....,, � �vf _• t. ` CounT Road 8 oft Ito 0 Ir 1 Existing i,,.l >n i ' � • ti " ♦ •� • � �� .i. i' �•, if • � � 1� ~'• � ' � • 3 � •, � �_.{ +� � ,aM• .•,, �I;.� �' R (`�a .�t ... tai t "� •• ( 1 EPP House j lie WOW -00 In ev Qf �,•� • - New Shop . _ ,� • �" "'� Under Construction 7 Care ' x �� r �' Cttl.� !rL ij , •, j N` ,. '.a �•';, + i ` N .- � .' f• r t qtr' . i +,�• •''� '�,,.• ' 'T1 �� V ' t 7 C I • t • ++ `! ,:I •T•►•1P:/ AK-EA 'T'tV � / • ' . `+1�.:'�aj' �` ��y,. •; ' ! .� ;. ~ I 8M cc CL 00 00 00 • f, ,l O 1 Original Shop 3 • Building • , , •' f Q E x I s t 1 n g f i t rj Garage �• l ot t 8 / f rr of loll it Shed l ► i I r � � " • r i;' tfiC'f"!a� L i.! & •f`- � - .� - . + . � � � .•ti ,,.K'. _ rr..in+.'1• � 1 f � ( ,,, � SITE PLAN F N I Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the city council of *the City Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of 198 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: 4 WHEREAS, Roger R. Fulk initiated a conditional use P ermi.t to construct two manufacturing buildings within 200 feet of a residential district at the following -- described : ro ert P P Y The East 250 feet of the West 533 feet of the North 3 feet eet o f the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 14 , Township 29 Range 22, subject to roads � This property is also known as 1810 E. Count Road B Maplewood; y , WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use P ermit is as follows: 10 This conditional use permit was approved b the Maplewood Y P City Council on February 13, 1984, subject to: a. The hours of operaton shall generally be between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. b. All equipment and machinery shall be stored indoors. c. All fire safety regulations shall be met. d. All junk vehilces and any other miscellaneous debris shall be removed from the premises, e. This permit shall be reviewed in one year from the date of this approval. 2. The Maplewood City Council renewed the conditional use P erm i t on April 8, 19 8 5 , subject to: a. The hours of operation shall generall Y be between 7 a.m, and 5 p.m. b. All equipment and machinery shall be stored indoors. c. All fire safety regulations shall be met. d. All junk vehicles and any other miscellaneous debris shall be removed from the premises. 7 Attachment 4 e This permit shall be reviewed in three months from the date of this f Adherence to the site plan, dated January 6, 1984, unless a change is approved,by the City's Community Design Review Board. 3. The - Maplewood City Council considered the conditional use permit renewal on , 1985. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the .city staff, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY..COUNCIL that the above described conditional use permit be amended on the basis of the following findings -of-fact: 10 The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter, 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zonin g district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises g lare , � g r smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run-off, vibration general, unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 60 The use would generate only minimal vehicular traff on local streets and shall not create traffic r con estion unsafe access congestion, or parking needs that will cause undue burden to -the area ro erties. p p 7. The use would be serviced b essential public ' Y p services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and p arks. 89 The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for ubl is facilities acilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 90 The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10's The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects, Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The hours of operation shall generally be between 7 a.m, and 5 p.m. 2. All equipment and machinery shall be stored indoors. 3. All fire safety regulation shall be met. G .1 r 4. All - junk vehicles and any other miscellaneous debris shall be removed from the premises.. 5. Adherence" to the site plan, dated January . 6, 1984 , unless a change is approved by the . c i ty' s .community design review board Adopted this day of , 1985. Seconded by Ayes STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that , I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of 1985, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complet t ransc ri p t therefrom insofar as the same r -e - a - tes - to - a_ cond - itiana1 - - use permit Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of P the city this day of , 19859 City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota . r r MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Renewal- --Home Occupation LOCATION: 2308 Dahl Court APPLICANT /OWNER: -George Rozsa Actim by .Counall. PROJECT: C and G Office Products DATE: August 6, 1985 ftdo SUMMARY. ' .R .ques Renewal of a conditional use permit for an office supply sales home occupation. Description of the Business 1. The business is conducted in the basement of the residence, 20 Additional employees: one secretary and one salesman who resides at the applicant's home. 3. The office is the only function of the business in the home. There are no retail sales from the premises, 49 The outside appearance of the home is residential. There are no signs. 5. Business hours: 8 a.m, to 5 p.m., Monday through Frida Y Comments This use meets all requirements of a conditional use permit for a home occupation. There have not been any complaints received concerning this use. Recommendation Renewal of the home occupation permit for C and G Office Products at 2308 Dahl Court for five years, subject to the original conditions of approval. BACKGROUND Site Description 1. Lot size:' 14 square feet 20 .:Existing land use: 'single dwelling and C and G Office Products Surrounding Land Uses Single dwellings except.for the vacant land to the east which is planned for RL, low density residential and zoned F, .'farm residential Past Action 7 -23 --8 4 : Council approved this. Cup, subject to: 10 The following items shall be provided: a. A fire extinguisher b. A single station smoke detector in the storage and office areas of the basement 2. The applicant must obtain the annual license for a home occupation. I 30 Sidewalk constructed to the north and south of 2308 Dahl Court, DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Planning 16 Land Use Plan designation: RL 20 Zoning: R -1, single dwelling residential 39 Section 36-442(e) of the zoning code states that all conditional use permits shall be reviewed by the council within one year of the date of initial approval, unless such review is.waived by council decision or ordinance. At the one year review, the council may specify an indefinite term or specific term, not to exceed f i ve Y ears for subsequent reviews. The council may impose new or additional conditions upon the permit at the time of the initial or subsequent reviews. 4. Refer to page 5 for the stipulations concerning home occupations. jw Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Home Occupation Ordinance --- Section 36 -66 LOCATION MAP 4 N .:, N LOWER AFTON RD. •:� • •.:: W. A . Z .• .68 P ) N " 0 ON 0) PONI • (4) 0 ........... w cr. "�' n MAILAND RD. y (4) 'A ;,. lt•I Q. Q L EAK DR. WOOD •;,. l D7G 9E MDR. •; . \HILLWOOD DR. SA4INGSIDE DR. O O O .:: 2 ..;. 23 •" ci LIH OOD AV K. AM AVE 72 ,.• DAHL CT, Z T24N 1 W f- Z •' ''� • 1122w It T - R 21 W 13 ` t fl YLI .., Q 72 4 494 HIG HWOOO 14 •' � 25 ' •�' MIE AVE. EMITZ AVE. �• , ., .-. SOUTNC Dlt .Mao - s T2 �:•: z Carver' BOXW OOD AVE. Lake a 494 • 68 a 0 OR CARVER T .. LOCATION MAP 4 N fir,• �'' �` %! { •q �4 ,. Ir t i + ' f T� .,. ^4 f #. �t sf f,�`� ►'( t a 1 ' ' 1� f/ J f' t� I t r y� •..,` � ��R � 4 � T'� '� . � ,f�. t jr k t ri In i •� y • _. r. l.• _ • r , _ - i S ,'• . .,r 1, I �.. ! '! .; ••yt` �r�r • ►/L' • ,4 ,'' ',. ,!I �+ fir, � � i ... .� t • i�jM Pit .0 40 1 40 '� ' 7 8 150' 7 '`T ' 9Z A 9 ` P 11;I till ;, 9G ' h t ' t .4 A .,� ' �� t y► is 1 • � 4 , I' �� O ►• .L I � � ,• � ` [ � ��� ��. o /•a� T/t� '' • ' � 1 � . f ' 1 " �;� • .!� ` �� :r ��y� '+ �� ., � • •+► t ` ! ; 4 4 r 2v ^ ^O l d 5 3 t2 M 8 . r • g i t ih 1$ , ( {• ► �•r �. G��� A ,•;_ �+, k /• `!�� ; � ifs ► 1�f �'';- (�'� •.•,�� r �•. 1^ `,, •, ��' { ., 1• ..• ,, ,�•��,', �� , "�,�f , ' • '' • j } 1 y �p�) It. , / �(���v� A + ,' .r � i y /��• ll 1 }r,�. •t ''4 t � � .'A, �• • -; 1 2. !t :!l «. i � . • �, • ��•• ��• �,� f ��� / i. 1 it r +t.'.+ y �p • 1 !S ttz kj I A I F.� +• s ;':t ,�' y � �; of 1 t 1 j r 1 r 1. a DID !,. • t t•' 1 n It t �' .�+ It J ! ' f,1 -� t. '.M', �,, . 1 . 777 . • ti t• irl + `v11' t.y� { r i I ',. L � ' % . M r �1 1 f } #, 1I+ f# 2319 ,±, , , ` , �{ r:,'" .� " it J` I , i • �; ,�+j • • . 1 b'! . O� , , � •'t��:li . 1 'f )+�yl `! �•• 4 f . 1,� » . ,,, %! r ` 1. f ` �� 1 +� • i r �r �i j,� t f i "i r� ' ..14, 1 -Y', �� !� ' .i' +{ �•7 . 1' !'�, 1-• I •,� .} ' •+- +. ,.` �' �'r� ii'iaa `� r ��/ '. , • :. •, r1,2 2 +r ^ • : • }: i • I• • .. • �){ •t �' : j' a ; •� TvII , . r, • (, s. , t , CC ��� } ,, • S 2 308 �t �•' i v 2 4 11�� / ♦ \ ���; ! 4t �•• !, ''.+ '• t• l t r �. •� •S� i �., • i• � .�iL� 1,, , M If • '! � �. F .. ' 't+ , 1 too oo ►� .�' j t I t. �� 29 •fir r �:;` �; }• ,17 c V i�"11 (,L '� 'W y t Ri f i +'' r ` n ; ' :: ' ` ; r. 2Z 2300 , *, V,� f •' Tln! r ♦, , + �• ,S• '� 'y ia,..•. �' ' "' .i f � ?., Y•iJ.t it- !` !• (. � J,� a, 4p • • + �1� . ' 1 9 w 4 �� - ,/ ' . '•!„t, It ,i r t• '� '' • � �1 r r.• � •+ K. .�.Y 1 . ( OI t` { 1 ' -`t.M; • � ip: � ; �, ' ' 2 2 6 2 " 2 7 0 a ' � t� �;� '. � 1 ! ,. , s �,.,.. �';: •' ,.�jtt �-� .. '��� ,��t :'�: It ,'' • ; . . 2278 2296 2 98 .' r 7 y�r� �`1 �' '�It q y rt ,�a . r : �n , a1 f, � {/ `y -, 1• , ,` y I l'� r• �„�,�:'.. : -. / K , 1 ,• /1 4 r:���y{, �' 7 a•� ,1 • 1 i { - � •!((1'�� �tl "i,1:�itr ' .�, •' S' O�Q ♦ ,. •c .'/ ' ' l� * '1 t •, Y f) 7Y. ' �M + • ,, t�.i •i�, '�'� + '� + �•7,•�'J„!)7I7I1,/f/f ,k � r.' +C •.� , ! : P , • '•�. , v, 'i' .. 1 ., t �, • � I %' ,* } e + :� Y •Ir .� , a�� '�' • • b: A: ,�j� y a +. • • t ,. wiI 'y' . ,�17 '� �'•� 1 .• '�• + i I r• r 1 M � �' $j ' �IS` 4 + �► ?' r �• �µ e� ► • ' e, S 'f i r �,.� ��� � , 1 ` ' f, � . :�, ? t .�`'�' / 'r : , L► ,1�•I ,�.•' ° �iM '. �'. ,.• ;t. �, t •ylr'11y{1, �,`,�1}' . w . , • L l e ,, , , - , G ,� • �I ' I t + e �. a . � ' ... , �, a..� %� .} I L `r 1 � �.�, 1 ,1 y,�: + �.+rr.� •9 ` ! , : f± • , � t�� :.s ',r. 1►•�.L ' '~ ,' .i • •; , • I t '` �' � 4 . �' ' :�� ; f ' �;� , �3tr7` •,,�•�'�r•• 1 a y � .�' •' � 1i. � fs } + ' tA Nz + �. ,�f+ ! • r �. '� ,. wl ; 1 r �' ..` �' a ,,••�r. #I M y 1 , �'� , .�.�. t• ( t.r,y1' �t �� h,.F•�r /,. olt S` r I rby . ' : , I 1, IY7 ,i t ,., . r _.� '-. 1 ' r . i 7. �.•♦ jj •t •'� '•`�• re li t M • fill s z . •• . 4 , • . 1. ! /,` * • ! , I .�i ,. , / a x'1i.f - 'i ' •�` a ,� , 7 !''� 1•.j'It', i. 't'••a11'� Jy 4. ) i 1 I S • �� 1 �.� �1 �" J � Y .•v `.w• :�' :!'�. , , �r r � •+. �, � •4 `' Yi •�• � +'f• 1 3� j,'t,�1;�, +• (,p'�� ' �j� `s �'A J �� ., S.�•� I-+ •}r ',' � ; •;. :.• 1 + I� • ! � ',�. � e f' 1 �✓ �•�i• I -. 1 I y + r • �. 1 � F !1 `l ','�t�7 �+7 � �t� {1 �'� ''i' � Si• '• • 1ijy 1� 4 + + ` '� M `� • '.� �. 1' `\ , �' 1 / ,� 1 { ' ' t• •' ,y • '' •'Q•' 1 ; 'Sh ,,y t i ! ' I.�i 1. ?y • M 1 � ,` i J ..� +.•, tt!. r ; ,r(;!. * }�,! �', 1i1 M f„f •7'' `'� 4• +• ^ tt :�'; it .1 1 .f r ' ��• J ` I , /a{ _• q. �•R'.S .•A,. ,J' .. , •,•'' 'S .•.. IFii if • t s " �:+ y a'} } r .• a . ' �: { ,.� • a , • 4 1 ✓tY( t ' 1 ' t i t `,/�• 1 �►r . 1 4 •� �,`r' y ,,. •. to Al b At f.•'1 �,,'+ !•�q �, ", -t r.,t • ++ .,'k,a 11 ' +, �• ', t •+ } +• ;'; , 4'1 �' + •., 1:. ; {, 1_.' r, �, I � * I + �. r, �. i �, . •+• y• �� „( 7 , t s ` / ! ?, , • •d, r .. 1 �� '. s 1 • �� '•. I +� (• V' • j1.' Yr+ 1 ' . i ;., 7r r t , �, y . ,; t y l ! • , _ „t ,° t , ' '• t •.� �� , .t,. r` i' . ! i �•' .a + r# 1, • r'. �'„ {{ I ♦,f (.•ti• r r. ^'F 7 -. :i � �: �. ' � yr • ,/'.{!�„ � ll .,, i •4 K, � � �� t r / ��y. 11 � t �' JW It mil.•'! f , , ` � "R .r, } � { , r, •[!• Y : ' , '`i I�LLT���rj r, � t'. '1 + , � , , r ti .r '• e I jt �', t � • %t '+� � t '• i :',1 � , ' •� • ��� .. • '� • .. r. �. i,,t 1 t ♦ 1 11 �. �. i, 4, + ..it 1, - T. •, S J ;!'����' �• } i O w � , t + w��.if ' t t 7 ,_ter ; �t jfj�,. It Alf ~•'f•�,><=t 7 1 '. •� r• a .fw ' •7� t 1 _•� ,•,• .* F •'. ` i •� •• +`�'It1y, �` •�. •f, tiF `R1A;'',�ni '!�{ I,* ,f• Y • ,���' r+ Q � ' `� � 1 ,Ir `. , • } .�,,. ,, r r [ t +1., 1��•!_J .7 - *+�•1 Ia i� ' �� ♦�. v.': � - � ', r :: N • 1 t fir/ ' ►• • ` ,11 � ,, . R , r.' � fi: • ti t 't , ,� ,.� �P, t' � �t•.�° �,• 4. 1 .� "1.. �i i t ? ..)J.. , �` r , ; , k `I' •./ j r 1 'o « I I r 1 , r y �' v .i �( a t . �. , fi r h O il �" ,'' 1 ' •t t' ��,� , •f +t1 ���•� y: . :i: I Yi�` { • i n r/ l +., .' �'!),�y tT �, -t' r • V- I' � Cn + • 1 . a, , �r •� r ` r ;4 f � •� �•e,/ ' 1 �' y Q ((,�,,, � a 1 .:�. �, I � yl• 40 f .'.. ' , ! ' � �.•� � � t. , • •+ ; +' � ± � ' �•;>� ti , •R7i t ; �+�i.., • M ,� i; ( !� I 1 • TI'1�. {' (_ I ! 1 • +• �� L, • . • j_i , 1 f ;.! • , 4 S a ! �' .�I M',,1� s Its*. OL �' ••r• It t . , •r 6..w V a am r 11.E Alm ���i�...�i� ~ ~ •� u -., ' e r }.� '' , ;� , � . � _ .. 1 � .' y n' + ri3 1 •�H ` ��(1�,9� . {•� I �C �, . � y) '�' '. T � y .tt'..�� � r , r � , i!� - " . '• , �� �:. � � '} t "y ' �' '..•�•�t' • �, .r���•�' • t :� 1 ?I� r :`• ' ►. N , , a . b Q .s • ,. !' ��,. ;�: ',`�' '�+ „' +; .r t r t � ' �r . i 1 , 15 , 14 13 ,,� ,.!•a..`h - 1 �; � `• , � � �,. ' , . � .. � � ..� �t 34.01 • . , ;;+ !�” j f; • _ ::i,� �. to }. ,ti ••r•+. /07 /00' ♦ 1� �, ;• • ,.�.: , ;•. .�p : 1< � 7 t Ii,s i�l��,�: • �►•' 1 J�.e...•t ; . �,� ••#_. • ) t +- '� . ` t tl'r I 4 ��• �' �. n .. j { ; l _ lI Ir !� f ' / I � �' v. '1 I. 1l A , t f r 4 1 •.. 1 r ? f- 7 WRER l y ' . V,. ' .r ••, 1 • , `, ''.�. f4 / /� • ♦ 1 gin. ', .4., L; •••` 1 , ` , 1•- - '� 'Its 4 •+ ♦ ••'' /! •' ; j ? r,. 'l1�t�� , r t1 'i 1 � , /• T',. t �,"��,.� ►�� 'II +/' PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 4 4 attachment two N 36 -66 a 4) a. Home occupations shall require a special exception permit for any of the following activities which would occur more than thirty (30) days each year: ' 1. Employment of. any person not residing on the premises. 2. Customers visiting the premises. 3. Manufacture of projects on the premises. 4. A vehicle(s) used in the home occupation, and parked on the premises, which exceeds a one -ton payload capacity. Home occupations which do not involve any of these :activities may: be permitted without a permit. -b, . Home. occupations requiring a permit shall be subject to, but not limited to, the following requirements: 1. Not more than one person, other than members of the family residing on the premises, shall be al- lowed to engage in such occupation. 2. An area equivalent to no more than twenty (20) percent of each level of the dwelling unit floor area shall be used in the conduct of a home occupation. 3. There shall be no change in the outside appear- ance of the building or premises, that would indi- cate the conduct of a home occupation, other than one sign meeting the requirements of the city sign code. , 4. Limited retail sales of products produced off -site may be permitted, but only when subordinate to the principal activity(ies) of the home occupation. 5. No traffic shall be generated by a home occupa- tion in greater volumes than would normally be expected in a residential neighborhood. The need for off - street parking shall not exceed more than three off - street parking spaces for home occupa- tion at any given time, in addition to the parking spaces required by the resident occupants. 6. No equipment or process shall be used in such • home occupation which creates noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odors or electrical interference de- tectable to the normal senses off the lot. In the case of electrical interference, no equipment or process shall be used which creates visual or au- dible interference in any radio or television re- ceivers off the premises, or causes fluctuations in line voltage off the premises. 7. No fire, safety or health hazard shall exist. 8. A home occupation shall not include the repair of internal combustion engines, body shops, machine shops, welding, ammunition manufacturing or other objectionable uses as determined by the city. Ma- chine shops are defined as places where raw metal is fabricated, using machines that operate on more than one hundred twenty (120) volts of current. 9. Any violation of these requirements shall result in the denial or revocation of the home occupation. 10. The city may waive any of these requirements if the home occupation is located at least three hun- dred fifty (350) feet from an adjoining residential use. 11. Approval shall be for a period not to exceed one year. Renewal shall be subject to the provisions of chapter 17, article II, of the City Code. r: MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand--- Associate Planner SUBJECT: Home Occupational Renewal LOCATION: 1887 Myrtle Street Actioll by Coll: APPLICANT /OWNER: Rebecca Behm PROJECT: Tailoring Business Endorsed DATE: August 14, 1985 odi ft+ SUMMARY R0300te fat Request Approval to renew the home occupation permit for the sewing business, Comments There have not been any complaints received regarding this home occupation. The only code problem is that the applicant has a sign on her mailbox identifying the business. Code limits home occupation . signs to be attached to the house and no larger than two square feet in size. Recommendation Renewal of the conditional use permit for the tailoring shop home occupation at 1887 Myrtle,Street for five Y ears, since there have not been any complaints received regarding this home occupation, and subject .to : 1. Inspection and approval by the Fire Marshal, 2.. Only one sign identifying this home occupation may be used. This P y is sign shall be wall -- mounted and shall not exceed two square feet in area, as required by code. BACKGROUND Site Description r 1. Lot area: 10,039 square feet 2. Existing land use: Single dwelling and "Sew, It. Seams," a home occupation . Surro.unding Land Uses Single dwellings except for ' undeveloped land to the west ro osed for P P a future neighborhood park. Past Actions 7- -5 -79: Council approved the applicant's home occupation with these conditions: , 1. The applicant shall provide adequate off- street parking, q p ng. 20 Inspection and approval by the Fire Marshal. 3. The special exception shall be issued for a one-year period, Y P iod. After one year, the council may review the use for possible problems, If none exist , the permit may be renewed, 8- 21 -80: Council renewed this home occupation. i PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 1. Land Use Plan designation: RL, low density residential. 2. Zoning: R--1 single dwelling residential. 3. Section 36 --442 (e) of the zoning ode states that all ' g conditional use permits shall be reviewed by the council within one year of the date of initial approval, unless such review is waived by council decision or ordinance. At the one --year review, the council may specify an indefinite term or specific term, not to exceed five years, for subsequent reviews. The council may impose new or additional conditions upon the permit at the time of the initial or subsequent reviews. 4. Section 36 -316 states that only ne fascia sign of no Y g t more than two square feet in area, giving the name and occupation of a home occupation, may be allowed. 5. Refer to page 5 for the stipulations concerning home occupations. mb Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Home Occupation Ordinance --- Section 36--66 NORTH ST. PAUL r6 _� HO LLOW AY AV AF 12 . o Ziz - :, w w JLEY AVE Y �� - 0 LARPENTEUR AVE. 30 z de' w cn cn AKE RD. w ac J Z Q w u �- LOCATION MAP '° Attachment 1 Ac N HOLLOWAY AVENUE -- - } r i S . ` X . Si i + • . ` j • i • • j . i r y a� + ' j ! g ..i— t . r ._ _ " 1 . 1 Lh L • + '7 it /'r ' o' Ave �.'aca tad V ��� hci �c� c, .o �� . 4 r, • 4A i �2 i , T � t R 384 233�4 �.`� s9s� 23�1 * � `;,;�.� .,P �•� (.6ri C3 ' 0 0 S ' f o , • �, t 1905 'a 1 o �A �� �f �� r q.� s X8.2 7 �� 20 Z2 rz L : z� z c Z7 1 1892 3�_ = ' f s `� 1 � � . i rJ � N ... :..:... ..t 1338 1887 :�::::. •: - . E R N EY l ion, Nom. - 82 ' AV E . T. S. � 7/8`!09 I S Zoo s E--- 186 '[3 F�. 1 866 _.0. _ - - - j , 1861 9 1858 ell `L� -- -- —=— � t8 { s — 4 Ce r i 17 •3 i „ lk,A woowftw� ie S Ica y — --- �--- 4 TRISBIE AVE. 15 I 1 Zs lt ,t�4. • 7 6 14� 1� = = S lO Z ... . .. dl00000ffi� W ct .._ _. to '. S G - Lo Q1 Q q C; llft� ....... Ln ..... "Woollo, 1- 7 co di R I I rN/- L" + _- . C� `° Z 1 Ll. 4 3 . 3 `t ti - - - - - . • • '^ c, K ��.� ; ; �_ .: %s' /a "!f/ .20./8' O° O�' "!�Y G3. ��?' Re _ t . t . A' SI PROPERTY' LINE /ZONING MAP 4 Attachment 2 4 N 1 36s6 (4) a:... Horne occupations shall require a special exception permit for any of the following activities which would • ` f occu more than thirty (30) days each year: '. 1. Employment of any person not residing on the premises. 2. Customers visiting the premises. 3. Manufacture of projects on the premises. 4. A vehicle(s) used in the home occupation, and parked on the premises, which exceeds a one -ton payload capacity. ..Home. occupations which do not involve an y of these activities may be permitted without a permit. b. Home occupations requiring a permit shall be subject ` to, but not limited to, the following requirements: 1. Not more than one person, other than members of the family residing on the premises, shall be al- lowed to engage' such occupation. 2. An area equivalent to no more than twenty (20) percent of each level of the dwelling unit floor area shall be used in the conduct of a home occupation. 3. There shall be no change in the outside appear- ance of the building or premises, that would indi- cate the conduct of a home occupation, other than one sign meeting the requirements of the city sign code. 4. Limited retail sales of roducts ' p produced off-site may be permitted, but only when subordinate to the principal activity(ies) of the home occupation. 5. No traffic shall be generated by a home occupa- tion in greater volumes than would normall y be expected in a residential neighborhood. The need for off- street parking shall not exceed more than three off-street parking spaces for home occu p a- tion at any given time, in addition to the parkin required b t g spaces re q y e resident occupants. . 6. No equipment or process shall be used in such home occupation which creates noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odors or electrical interference de- tectable to the normal senses off the lot. In the case of electrical interference, no equipment or process shall be used which creates visual or au- dible interference in any radio or television re- e ceivers off the premises, or causes fluctuations in line voltage off the premises. 7. No fire, safety or health hazard shall exist. 8. A home occupation shall not include the repair of internal combustion engines, body shops, machine shops, welding, ammunition manufacturing or other objectionable uses as determined b the ci Ma- y y chine shops are defined as places where raw metal is fabricated, using machines that operate on more than one hundred twenty (120) volts of current. 9. Any violation of these requirements shall result in the denial or revocation of the home occupation. 10. The city may waive any of these requirements if the home occupation is located at least three hun- dred fifty (350) feet from an adjoining residential. use. 11. Approval shall be for a period not to exceed one year. Renewal shall be subject to the provisions of ^U r% 1 A _L:_1_ TT _r it � .. �. a r A 4' MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Planner -- Johnson ������ �� �ounci .. 1. SUBJECT: . Assoc iate Final Plat LOCATION Skillman Avenue and Bradley Street Eadorge OWNER /OWNER: Pat Goff PROJECT:, Highland Town Rej , DATE: August 16,-1985 SUMMARY Request Approval of a final plat to create sixteen town house lots a. common open space area (Lot 17) and a large remnant parcel (Outl A) to be . .platted as the second phase of the development, Comments All of the conditions of preliminary plat ap have been satisfied. Recommendation Approve the Highland Townhomes final lat subject ect to P • � withholding the signing of the mylar copies until the common open space portion of Phase I is designated as Lot 17 (see lannin comments P g . ) BACKGROUND Past Actions 4- 23 -85: The community design review board conditionally approved . site, building and landscape plans for this project. The only , condition that affects the first phase plat has been complied with 5- 30 --85: Council approved the preliminary plat for this development (page 5 ) , PP P > subject to the following conditions being met prior to final plat approval: 10 Submission.of the homeowners' association agreement and by -laws to the director of community development for approval. The document shall address the responsibility for the maintenance of all on --site private utilities, driveways and common open space. 20 A developer's agreement with the required surety shall be entered into for all on -site public improvements. 30 Final grading, drainage and utility plans shall be approved. 40 The developer's agreement shall include language that requires survey monuments for the corners of each lot. If the structures are built prior to the placement o f the permanent survey monuments, the footprint of each structure shall be pinned by a registered surveyor to assure the party walls are constructed exactly . can the common lot lines.. (This condition will be enforced by the building official at the time footing inspections are made.) 5. Submission of a water quality management plan for city engineer. approval that complies with the requirements of Section 36 -566 (f) (2) - 6 . Developer to investigate the possibility of moving the driveways on Edgerton to the north. (To be considered when the second phase is developed.) Planning The common open space is suppose to be designated as Lot 17, Block 1. The lot number was mistakenly left off of the plat. Jc Attachments 1. Location Map 20 Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Preliminary plat 49 Final plat (8 1/2 x 11) 5. Final plat (blue line) LITTLE CANADA NX 35 Sandy Loke b' A V l v m b t NON AVER 0 �0 O AVE. �ROSELAwN a. 0 3 SEUXON AV- 0 i it SUMMER AVE.4 raw TON AVE it C QE's CT O W W KIN3 M � W � 0 W cs < m 3 rl 55 ST. PAU L u -- ou 1 A I 1.7 . .o L oAre " Pho LOCATION MAP 3 Attachment one 4 N — - .,. uns (ZS) . 6 ! sc • I ��"� �� I r 3 �- � � ( 3) 44 U 70 O 50 3 o t b ---- ---- � 28 � . .. (L� 'T 3 7,sc O � z ' _. �� 0 O.42 vt N 1 Ul tY r i 1 lrK (L2) E3 ri� (" , +) AWX AGO 0 r _b: - . r . 00 I tT Act OTC.. • i r r ,. % ..... r O 2 p OGO I S ti z5 40 X26) i vl) - 5 (31 W S 1 9 5. 2101 -2103 084 P'1� �-- 2, R Mmi <� ) 4 Lu CC � .s in 2091-2093 o't o � O z� 21� •' �'�'� 5 133. hi 1 66 E AVE 2087 -2089 2080 ,( ti 14 1 2075 2077 �, �,, q 2 .80 <sL) - Csl �a M I e - 074 loo ' • Y i r R r 1 { • • I 1 I • • • l : I . • •. r Y r ♦ i : 0 7 ' ••Ia • ♦ ••.•a a•. •I • fr . �•. • • +i rt ✓ i •.•.•• ♦•1'•••1 •R r • •r R• • a• •I.R••• • r !� • , 1�Y, R •ia. ♦♦• iR•• as • •aL a • • •• ►t•• (30) ++r• �� /�/� ■yam � - �•� 'r r �' • P • /�i r t s`•tt tllly,+•►if' f y��♦ � a �r , .� •,1 rR• r : r ♦ �f••�. ''��,t'' • ♦ ♦ • rti ± �+ r1��4�a• r + • • r Rt•� r�•,�i.�1 +•r� i f , r • • 'i'• ab {,�R. . i a i • • • ♦ � 1 � . • • �aa • �' 'i1 "• Na�l i . O '•► R r • , � R ✓,`T� t• f Y a i �Y -♦�, • 1• -• Y • • . R a • • r �• : ♦♦ �Y ♦1YI'1� 1 . �,• R l •R"C • ► 1 �t • r +�l r i i t •� • ' R l• ar. • R . • • • i vti a�G. . .• a .'�•:► i • •r • �.R a .�'.�1. • .i i •�r • ♦ r :,� h •••.�,It+•L..•:�;• /1• rr:: r•�,rr. • •V • •• •a a/•• • .• 3 s ; :ti�e'�•���';� r": +�..�$.�r ;�,.�•ar l iar aty �' . ' a . .� .S' . a �.,.;.• .... ;• 1 .::. �• a aft R; . r . . .V .. .; ! ••r, �••I •v • M r i • •� • 1 L : • ► • :� .. as.•�r _.•.•r ..�.. .. ♦ •�• • •il• r •b r • t ✓• b�►4 • R a r'1'••r', •! �1. • R a t r. r • • /•�/ + • S • L • l r • ' . •''R • • • ti r r r h•• R a / Y+"•AY • r • r : 1, • f • 4 1 . 4 ' 1 1 • ' , 1 : t ✓ .% •. • • Y R r a • R • R R } a , � , I'1 �I • {• rr wr • ✓i • • r • O • • ♦ • • ► ♦ • • .� . • + 1 tfY -. /• ry 1!I . .. • r'4 • • s�'• • / I t • r 1 ♦ a R•• � • r , ♦L•• r !`'• i : v / . ♦ • • . •M1► aRR:: a•a ✓•••••r •� : • t • •4•.• 1 r `♦••- • •• /� ••} ♦ a: : • i i.• r 1 • �'•'ti••y✓: w •ir •a "•� ,• ♦ • .. 1c, r r.•►�`y •:•; : .. t .. F •.; : ;� Vic.. • . :p .a 3 ••►fR! rl 1♦O+ {••• vrY•t�• • P � C ) '/•r:. r!••�ia•: i , '�a�1 R • R • •� • . ••as!•RY ,• '.'• f f'�• ia1• ♦✓�Y•: ✓ tl • • • i � �►.� • r { •' ri• f • ♦ r► •a • t a•.' • • • a • 1•r••i , •S•'• •�•:• i MOW a ' �1♦i•� • ♦ .'1 .. r � � • •'♦�••r'%. 1' '• , . • .'.• �, • i':1i. •i'••a4:a9• . /C1 • • I Y a ♦1R %• t t • • l� Rrlt t . + Y — — {f a r ; • t �' • ? I R . • a i .' f�► , •• • •• t�. a a♦ •S r ' . • r�a •�ar:�• ✓ ✓a "Y ii I } r•� J •i♦• i .• �a� Y '� a • v a��. • ' R�,�'a'• • �♦ia •'► + t � . • i • •• 1 • .�.. l ►: a � • t:. aa t'. .♦.; . , . :l t�. ..S, . t� ... Y" 4 C�� . !♦ t. a , •.`,�.v• . '::.;r�, .•: v •;•r.;.y�. r;a�✓.;, 2 ••a r~ • ✓1 r ;• r ► Y'• r r .�.Y. '� �vr I • •R t1: Y .� ♦ • r • s • • + �r ♦ j I _ ► ! . ♦ : i • .fie': • : • 1 • : y • , • r • •• • .• : ':. . r • wa li,•• ti i•.ija . i`l li A 1 / � • I • r • r.• ♦ ! Lr a ►•} ♦ . ', '• 4 ♦ .�r • ��► • faI • a • i :�•r• ,t.. �' � . ✓�r• •••.• .� •l13' ,ri • . •'Y . i�1 • �"� ;.. a•• t •r♦1, •f i•0 . : « • 1=• • i•,•y. I • , �• • • 1 •• • • • r 1. • i`+ : •• • i, . • a►♦ r ► J , � 1 •tf•� • . r i • • •ti • ri: r t �? HIGHLAN � � - i ^ �.' '•� R� a ��• • ► • i 1 i 1 • . :. • • kA J • • ► i a ,ra R r t • R • • R • Vii • r •h r•►�• •1 • ':: • '• '•• ' : • d::1 •: � •• • • •►• ✓aif' i r�. i ,'i :: • •.' • a'.. • i , � t � E DG E RT t•: •• .r .. . �:�. a . L . ; ..; ,- .... ..... .1• : . � ✓�• r I � r : ••••' .'.'. • ••1 . • •ri�'t`r :• ' + icf'% 43C • - J t ;1 t i : i w 1. t , r ,t� /•,♦.� w • 1`r • :�.�Li I�. �v' , • • R r4„at .f y • ; i ';�;. • i� . r :: �Y••♦`r•f••••`. • v :, • • • :fj� •� • �::• • Y••fr' •:'4 ' r"j ' • Y •.•a •a+ .�,••• • 1'r R�s'r t i s�, • �� • t R • t .j��, • �.�a.• 't ' ►aa�rrt �• :' i' APARTMENTS nl •. :.; �•, ' ,�.4: • i a :, •r F.✓:•.'vf.:. r •.� r r •'• ?ir•.r : : ✓•: 0 V O . t 1• , . r . •. •� •a ", r • •• I �. ••% Y ✓ �l!R • Rb;l • S'.•':.:• ra.�a ✓R•+• 12&A C% 1 Z Z-- ' 8 •• 3.z 'fr, 143. g• =1�'� z3 3 . SAM ' ' 15 �' ~` — • o , • 41• 2032 • • v • 1 to Aj ) 2 (7) EDGER a ED ' S.��� U�ERTO _� R Cu " • r HIGHLAND 1 HIGHLAND MA'( iR. to ' $ APART ENTS APARTMENTS APARTMENTS t 1 1 4,70 ac. � �. *a5oc 3. 4loac I 05 o (3 ) ±C -43o 1 Vi I I a9 e of Map I cwooci Y. 1 1.,,, a l_X_ n4 �Al PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 4 Attachment two 4 N I . Phase I I . , Phase .._. ...._ .• . . � j s ^I IT , » =� 4 340 _.9a.__' 32-11 z ox I 24.0 "^ 33 Oz fr Z4 CS Alt— 2 t 33Oa i I , 15 �o x 320 N a344 3 rev. - _ r_ + -�- .____._ n' N .e • ,o •: Ito r as .� 11340 4' •N 33.0• N. • 1p � ,�• - -� •� T ; rr , ; .5 - - - -- - ` �,0 33.02 32 4 ,o; - - - -- • -- - ` —= - - - -- ••~ ! - v a : !�- t N r�' as 1 HIGHLAND TOWNHOMES Preliminary Plat • - Approved 5 -30 -85 Attachment three 5 Lu �. CY 1 , I• J I a 000 � 1NV.920.3 .•�... ( I 1 9e , , I W 31JO 911 OLO N 3 31.0 a ; 9e • W • ,� 3 , •. i' ' �4! a3L0 4 31-Oz q _ ___ •- - -_ - -- -- -- -- O t - - J - 0 - . �... • " J3 _ - '• -- - - 1 ' � I -�— _ ZIP. I - - StCtLLM/��l AVENGE" INV 9i? e - f 4 N " I . Phase I I . , Phase .._. ...._ .• . . � j s ^I IT , » =� 4 340 _.9a.__' 32-11 z ox I 24.0 "^ 33 Oz fr Z4 CS Alt— 2 t 33Oa i I , 15 �o x 320 N a344 3 rev. - _ r_ + -�- .____._ n' N .e • ,o •: Ito r as .� 11340 4' •N 33.0• N. • 1p � ,�• - -� •� T ; rr , ; .5 - - - -- - ` �,0 33.02 32 4 ,o; - - - -- • -- - ` —= - - - -- ••~ ! - v a : !�- t N r�' as 1 HIGHLAND TOWNHOMES Preliminary Plat • - Approved 5 -30 -85 Attachment three 5 Lu �. CY 1 , I• J I a 000 � 1NV.920.3 .•�... ( I 1 9e , , I W 31JO 911 OLO N 3 31.0 a ; 9e • W • ,� 3 , •. i' ' �4! a3L0 4 31-Oz q _ ___ •- - -_ - -- -- -- -- O t - - J - 0 - . �... • " J3 _ - '• -- - - 1 ' � I -�— _ ZIP. I - - StCtLLM/��l AVENGE" INV 9i? e - f 4 N • • 4 • N 89 14"E '5772S ' . Y ut I•r Eeafon••t.,, I' 2 28 X 9.50 N t9• Ste' Q6 [ •'i ' a N •v'•► Ee•• m•f•l•. « e t4.tD t D N N ••OfJTLOT A +n 3_ .00 _ 69 00 4 h 6.Q0 I- so ass' 0c, ti _ ri "• •. • T 1 N _ tit9••. 06 -EV e E A 8g�S3 in tS W i9. - ^G • w - N 39°•5 06 •E i �' ... -•• i • 12 41, • 1 ° al ti d9•S3 JE "E O • o • • 1 s i a •, g +:: .'' p e of ca a • K '9°i -'�t•E - ..S Ily I p � � h •. T ft9. dA. : � • " . �. •r•:+.••. �. i ,. � -' � ,. ••� •. ♦IV -•� to • • '� r 8 Y fir. O Q : ... r. :�� - -.. - - r 1• O V o .. . ^' •._.•••' - a ° •� v T �,. � • _•9.57 � ' ... o t p 39.00 O 0 y•�D•r'��• ~ 0 ••. ` E S I .150.50 •-, �. at it it QO vp A'dt Gi' E I : .g -„ 24 N «1 Z r 0 �. N .. •w..... 1 .� 29.8T r? = 774.23 ° •— ' - :.- PJ89•v9 `,4r 15 S . 502 h •'•V�,ii >>.a•�♦ Gam/ /•30. +7• ,'. =! CG fcifm•�� O M' Q �- --- i -t- co ��? i. •E3 143.48• da/1030,00 ; - ' 99.45 O • A G!3ev4'36'' Rs1457.23 v_ ' 1 r Cc i 1 HIGHLAND TOWNHOMFS Final plat • Attachment four 4 N 39.00 o 8900 o. 16 ° • O N • H tS• ?s't* • E N •• •=! S900 let c - S.1 o m 15 3 a w -• T on o' tl 14 ' OI , •eo•E'�`E �e ? x e9 00 1 A C �5::• C t4.tD t D N N ••OfJTLOT A +n 3_ .00 _ 69 00 4 h 6.Q0 I- so ass' 0c, ti _ ri "• •. • T 1 N _ tit9••. 06 -EV e E A 8g�S3 in tS W i9. - ^G • w - N 39°•5 06 •E i �' ... -•• i • 12 41, • 1 ° al ti d9•S3 JE "E O • o • • 1 s i a •, g +:: .'' p e of ca a • K '9°i -'�t•E - ..S Ily I p � � h •. T ft9. dA. : � • " . �. •r•:+.••. �. i ,. � -' � ,. ••� •. ♦IV -•� to • • '� r 8 Y fir. O Q : ... r. :�� - -.. - - r 1• O V o .. . ^' •._.•••' - a ° •� v T �,. � • _•9.57 � ' ... o t p 39.00 O 0 y•�D•r'��• ~ 0 ••. ` E S I .150.50 •-, �. at it it QO vp A'dt Gi' E I : .g -„ 24 N «1 Z r 0 �. N .. •w..... 1 .� 29.8T r? = 774.23 ° •— ' - :.- PJ89•v9 `,4r 15 S . 502 h •'•V�,ii >>.a•�♦ Gam/ /•30. +7• ,'. =! CG fcifm•�� O M' Q �- --- i -t- co ��? i. •E3 143.48• da/1030,00 ; - ' 99.45 O • A G!3ev4'36'' Rs1457.23 v_ ' 1 r Cc i 1 HIGHLAND TOWNHOMFS Final plat • Attachment four 4 N • � 1 .t t MEMORANDUM Aotion by Counoil TO: City Manager Bndorsed FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson SUBJECT: Final Plat M odi fi e d LOCATION: Dorl and and Mai 1 and Roads #e3+etse+� OWNER/APPLICANT Good Value Homes, Inc. Dt PROJECT: Maplewood Hills Second Addition DATE:. August 16, 1985 SUMMARY Re guest Final plat approval to create 44 quad lots (eleven structures). Proposal Refer to the final plat and site plan on page 5. Recommendation Approve the Maplewood Hills Second Addition final plat. Y - r BACKGROUND Past Actions 4-23-85: The Community Design Review Board conditionally approved-the site, landscaping and b u i l d i n g plans dated 4 -15 -85 for this project. The only condition affecting platting of the council approval of a planned unit devel— opment or rezoning. 5- 13 -85: 1. Council approved a conditional use permit for this planned unit development to: a. Adherence too the site plan, dated April 15, 1985, unless a change is approved by the city's Community Design Review Board. b. Construction must be substantially started within one year, unless an extension is granted by council. Further reviews are waived, 2. Council approved a preliminary plat for this project, subject to: a. Council approval of the planned unit development by the same name. b. Entering into a developer's agreement, with the required surety, for the construction of on —site storm sewer facilities. C, The developer's agreement shall require the corners of.each lot to be identified by land survey monuments. A registered land surveyor shall certify that the location of the footings for the common walls are as proposed on the site plan, before they are poured. (This requirement w i l l be enforced by the b u i l d i n g o f f i c i a l . ) 4. Submittal of the homeowners' association bylaws and rules for approval by the director of community development. This document(s) shall adequately address the private maintenance responsibilities for the driveways, parking areas and on -site private utilities. 5. The city engineer must approve the final grading, drainage and utility plans. mb Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Final Plat and Site Plan (8 112 x 11) 4. Final Plat (Blue Line Copy) 2 UPPER AFTON NO. 16 T2$N R22W 2 41 s _J •• ' •'• LOWER AFTON RD 39 � • • • �': L A • F- Z NO (2 ' (II A AF Poo (4) 0 'D- (4) 4 MAIIAND RD. p Ai: :•: 3 w Q §TEAK- DR . n' OO D OA GE DR. riLLW000 DR. m Z Z . O d > > o iNGSIDE DR. -� •• 0 0 0 rill L I N w 00D AV ME 72 .. AHL DAHL Z C T, y. o �• TM W ~ Rt 'UWE R21w z 13118 T TIME .YLI Q ' 3 � ' 72 494 HIGH WOOO AXE 4 25 MIE AVE,. �g EN TZ AV_. - 25 SOUTHC _ 72 I.! LOCATION MAP 0 3 Attachment one "� ('• 40 4 C4 �9 2 0 L9 I N 1 _ a 60.7 40 ' �a Tip oa'N�o s - l -To ` a - TO � , ump ation - - - - • IN -1-64 -n rn 40` 9 Of , * 1 Zi i Cie APARTt 1Z•�.1 1O ' .. _� © V �'... t, ' 420• �; 1 _.. i..� ..�:i. 73 ' 75 1 7 7. 3 68 1"13. 11 co L1 8.41x, 33 X 30 23at.. A-) S ,� wC-• (3 ) Z9f _ 0 2 3 40 &A _ -- 2 m •Zj 4 - � 1 40 Ae 177,368 73.41(e� ' % 00 C 21 187418:1 ` _ t 442 � 132 t ( X MCKNIG-HT `j"owivNoMES McKnight Townhomes co � oP ( N� VTILITY -y � � ' 114 t�! 32 1 A. 0 s 9 �!(pta -7 1 ! ° 9 *2 3 30' 'e ^ h' (CODC5 13 TNRU 202.) 'A 0 0 �•i '` i� • a' M'r`• •• a1�'�s�t��r i i��,+y ,• � � \ � �, .wood O a. f t'i . l• . ''i�41, �li"•• .: t, ,• r { !., Vol ^: •• a: •�; • +► • /•♦• f: T. ,• ?� � rye � a a r d e n •�•: i••..::, f. •w • :• .}e��':•'•'•.•:.:•:: +• - • L•,, � ''•'� . • • •y ♦ r • a YY } 1 ,�V,/ a r f a�ai�i!aa•A�ii••✓ri ai. i V O 9 • .'1bi+'•:4, ••�". • , It •' ,y+�• .. :• . ',� •.�.* � ` N I • i • •;•,4 � �� .al,Y,Y•� {�; J!iY�i f� � •.: I'�a �� .r�►� i �•at ••5 ` �� �•`• � ,ala�' +��rf��•ir : a • i I� ••• • �ar� *�� • �4 -a r a•a�. • �ya r . . i _ 4 ,1` `.; �•r. -• 3'� •r iti;:• : r: •• ♦r• •a .�• ♦iai• ii•,. r•• . •• N •��j �► l iati. �ti `� fi'i i� .• , :•i•i a i •• {a��.�••.•a•, • f: ai • a • a'•�� a r . afa`• • «'i .: a + ai ,. ► • • •a •••A• i• •• ••► • ••r••••••• :ii ► • �. f • o. Xo tL' i ;•,•ys;f,•:i •:•i'ir • ► •� • +' •"• r•• ; : 5 a f • • �t. • i �. '• • t, a. • f • • a i r •i rya • • • j0 � "' McKnight Townhomes ' • v►: • • • ri: •••:: i:� r;:f i ♦ :. ••• . • {� f. :l••�a�•r:•r. •� , : • 1•,►rda':: •` .:•a >ir'i,' l.L r• iri• 'h�• ..... i ♦'. •► • ♦♦ •i4 t• ar}e.♦ay •i'r•r J► l ••a . •.• r �••• :•a•i• • {: • • : • ► • r f ib : •P 'a'Y :•:•.• •.a a•i : •,.��. i 0 • .• 7 + • . A f • a • a air • s ti� i••�r ,•♦ ► • •y•• •� �; • • ••�r �•' all• fc iii• it • +/: • i : Yi•: • � O ••: ati•: • •• • a+ r : }i•►• ... tar. • i . • r4 } i` : 4 -1 :•,. �"�• te a, .,.}.�. Y EASE M ht`f K •�•�i•� •f�, }4 . ''•�� • •� r •i it �. t ! • a •.,.•t♦a{ r ♦ L .� ... • . y�r ,• o f•,����ir�� .,�� :... . -* Nygv l 2 r . •,• • .ar• Y • a lr f ♦ ••i�r �• ' t • ♦ .,' • a a r a iI•'�► �•� • a r . 1 t :� •l f;. ,•�. • Zb•�'�l •••• .ylr. l id•�� y 'a i l: • i'a • i 5 � : a rs• , '•�� a ��/�9 •�r,!�,5/ a' 1�'ir , •:r: .�'• • +Ir a • . 'a,'� �' •'1' •� • r a a .,. i � a •y .•.'. .. ...., :. .• • • X . ` a • �li i'�; :• •�. • ar. : •• •:•r • a • ► : '.Jw . �r Isla i . • • •' ♦ • a :r ( • d. • .C►`f j• ;s ri': 1 j :�:� : •i : ► V i f.:�'a•r •te • a • • ♦ . J i� I ♦ 1 • . • • • • • • • f a • 1 f ► a • V. . • • a • ,. • f ♦ a:• ► •i'i•.h '.:: ,�r. •,;••♦•'i • r,{►a,• :r :•. fi « •. : .. fl �.. *a. . r . . _ P � vt•• • . •• • •: 1• .•air• +• 1 • ••• : .• f • •• :•••:f . } i i ••,�, 1 ► •� f•.�a • •l•r►l � .� r I•ia • • (y ��i• J a, i 'SI 1 .. :: i I' •all � + • I as �•� r.: i : (Q • r • ••• r a�, • • • li • • 1 • r a 0 i' `a i•:•��, -►,if a i�f`: {l� • • r ► • dJ aa� i ?i : V . Q� 1 • • • •• / a 1 • 1 . • a a •jS• • • �• • i �ry l ►'Y. • • •, aa••al• ..%,: a .� • 1� • i • .: ' A/ `' • s i i 'i • ,ay' :::`•. +a`'a'�:r•••�.�: ♦�`a•••_:.•'��•4l••�.i�,.�a• ±• .r.ay'•`•�•'y • f a .h , T" l :'G 1 •TI1':i �:b"�: ►•!'a`� •• �. •,• a i ;, � _ t 1 � • •• 1••.• •rr • ••• •�• •:L• a �. o �•/ 7 T . 1 •'r/'a�• *• §' f a • ��i l P� • a a' •a a • • • • • l a • i s :1 i a` y> i ••a `•a•SI••`► }+j.••i • a f •�• : - . fi4 :•i !i �:::'ii:: :'r► . y • +• .... •.L•� • *. • • ::• o driveways f - - - - - - - _ - •.....•a: ♦ f ' .�:...�:.:.. . • - • •A. •• .• r•ti• Location .� ��iP ►r•••'ra '.�'. ►: r '') r �♦• • il' ,: • .• .S• } a i �••. `• • i i d ,� ► . i;►: ' i ..; . ,,• . � .. .,,•, ,.,,:�:. ..,,s:. •s�.�'•;.•; ! onto Mailand R oad ♦••�•;.,• •••ti ill' • '+i +: r . aa � a .: • . • •;: •' 6••: ,•.•. �. . , :.. li + a a ••i : 4.: •l1 .' 'i'i w ••• .y`�� � , •• �': • � ii •' � � i i • : i � ir - "� �► f ~ - .. i • ✓• • Ol• :':ray : � ,:•: •'. 1 / • a'ti� • l• .. • • .y . • a :• • •hr 1 r��y� • • . y ♦ • r 1•• . :rliaa:•a � . j � • : YI � • s'• '•^ . a � } : :: • :'a ' �, �• , , 1 0 O .. •r.... •••••4i• 1 • y r a a a 'f i�••.�,r'�• ::i a : � : :ai� i ,, Q �. •• •ti :s••l •ir. ••. ••. aii - N . 5 �¢ o►.c_.. _ .� ,•� . ,, . ; •C;'� .. ... :...... it ; s+ U4% .fl ! (n 2 • � • • i i,i • ♦••• �• r i :1� :: • : : i i rY • r •i.�r 11� p ht 11 , O •i•y ' � i �: �r�l�r� .S f„•;, : i•� ,a.•�y �.,, T �' 253' 5 2 2290 _. .. 2300 13; 30'-" 1 2310 2.00 2320. ' PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 Attachment two 4 N . N In N r / OD N /' ►' / %'i 00 1 IN 11 / t \ 1 1 1 f 1 .• 1 � to r 1 N . OG r , 1 p O 1 ( m / ..+ ado _.. - _.._._._ —. a ��'�� . , _ • _ ------------------ - - - - -- - - - -- - - -- ---- M-- _�• -War --. ----- - - - - -- Maplewood Hills 2nd Addition w Final Plat and Site Plan 5 Attachment 3 4 N FROM: Thomas Ekstrand--- Associate.Planner SUBJECT: Building Relocation LOCATION: East County Road B Gil • Marie K. Gramse APPLICANT /OWNER. . DAT July 31, 1985 ndo e SUMMARY 19odift a � Re jeote Req D Approval to relocate a single dwelling and detached garage from Shoreview to a lot west of 741 East County Road B. Description of Structures 110 House style: rambler with a full basement which will have a walk --out to the front 2. Exterior: stucco on three sides with a vertical board cedar front. The front of the new basement ( the walk -out portion) will be brick. 3, Garage: two --car detached. The garage is also stucco on three sides with a cedar front to match the house. 4 House size: 24 by 44 feet (1058 square feet) 50 Garage size: 22 by 26 feet (572 square feet) Comments The ro osed dwelling and garage are of a standard design and would be P P g compatible with the surrounding homes. In addition, the proposed house and garage will be placed considerably farther back from the street than most of the neighboring dwellings, and also be buffered by existing trees. The removal of the two old out- buildings on the proposed site should be required as a condition of this approval. Approval to relocate the proposed dwelling and garage to the lot west of 741 East County Road B, on the basi that: 10 The structure's exterior siding, height, mass, age and style of construction are compatible with that of the average home in the neighborhood 29 All city code requirements can be met. f 3. Water runoff from the site will not cause an adverse effect on surrounding properties, 4. Public streets can:be protected from damage. 50 The proposed move would not degrade the public health, safety or welfare Approval is subject to 10 The applicant providing proof that the deed has been recorded to create this site, prior to obtaining a building /moving permit. 2o The garage and shed on the subject lot shall be removed. 2 BACKGROUND Site Description 16 Lot size: 1.37 acres 29 Existing land use: -a garage and shed which ar-e out for the home- at 741 E._ County Road B., These buildings will. be removed to make room for the proposed dwelling* 30 Existing easements - There is a pond ing easement ' ove.r the northerly 430 feet of the property plus a storm sewer easement over the.easterly five feet. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: single dwellings located 600 .feet away Southerly: E. County Road B and.single dwellings Easterly: an older single dwelling Westerly: single dwellings Past Action 3-- 6--85: t A lot PP was split approved creating this parcel. Originally, this p parcel was the west half of 741 E. County Road B. Approval was subject to the dedication of a drainage pond easement* PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 110 Land Use Plan designation: south half - -RL, low density residential north half--OS, open space 29 Zoning: F, farm residential 3. Section 9-64(a) requires that the following five findings be made for approval of a building relocation request. a. The structure's exterior siding, height, mass, age and style of construction are compatible with that of the average home in the neighborhood b. That all city code requirements can be met. c. That water runoff from the site will not cause an adverse effect on surrounding properties. d. Public streets:can be protected from damage. e. The proposed move would not degrade the public health, safety or welfare. 3 Section 9 -.64 b authorizes council to require compliance with any 4. Se ( ) or all of the following conditions, or any additional conditions that are deemed necessary: a. 'Cash , escrow, an irrevocable letter-of credit of up to $ 1,000.00 or an equivalent quality of security as approved by the 0 City council to guarantee any street repair that may be required rezulti-n g from damages- , caused .by moving the building b9 Lot lines shall . be verified by the applicant by survey. pins. c. The P etitioner shall furnish an irrevocable letter of credit or cash escrow 1 1/2 times the estimated cost of remodeling, refinishin g or otherwise constructing or reconstructing such buildin g in accordance with the plans and specifications. With this surety, it shall be further conditioned that the work will be completed within ninety days of the issuance of the permit. 50 A house moving permit is required from Ramsey County Public Works for .travel on county right -of -way. t jw Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3 Front elevation date -- stamped 7--17 -85 4 r • F A R �� F j t - v CITY L a��k�E R •� . R OF L/TTLE CANADA r R R I' _ R A n ---_ " E ` l F v' .. RL '1 I r ..... - - - -- • -- URKE AVE �, R � 8C R F s .� _ LORIDGE- R - ~ - A I - - - U rf� tal 0 i , I I �► a (R2 2 �' — , ' ; O SKtLLMAN AVE __ - • -- _... R o � P w t u i I( t; J a �Qv v LER �NRA t. 1 3 4 � RNON (n Cr BC• F R z p F D OWNS AVE cr - F F w z w LL, cr G I uj Ll �; ` ROSELAWN R Q • - U L(3 __.. __.._ R _. -R AVE_ �' _ R �b AVE BE L. 0D AVE " BC R SUMMER '• I W F E FENT N Q Q F W r F D uj o •Z A R � .R w • 1 W kict E r W _ - R cn m a r R V o- L� F • a- F I t R \ T �� a�E �� �, I 5 AL C F - BIC �j ur F I- 8 C R 3 ' R R �; r- -- ff- F rA E g LL L R- ^c F R C/ FY OF ST. PAUL LOCATION MAP 5 .Attachment 1 Q N r , 0 ?s ftrz 0 30 � �, 95 i i ro lsz .4 E,q.ac. � 1 o! 9.7 5 4 �C dC _ .5�►ac 9 . � ...C+ .� ac (3 ( (?- 2 C 2t ) .s N C PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 6 � 20 as 3072 .! g tl90 Ll Attachment 2 4 N l . Grp .aa o _ 1 r'' 1. - „`�. _ � �. .• � • - - af. 3 Z 'Z '�.�r.--- .:_.... -:. .....�.... ,,.. :fit ,- �..'�::,- ._,,:.. ;_ .',•.. - _-_ ;.:, _ 777 - _ y 1 ` V r .. .: - ,rr,,, .. c = M ^- 1_ . - � �- ar.�c::.::.:;w:-��.� i._i.._•.E . __ _ r w .. -,. �.1 F. ^ �= r :r. f �:.: �.` 23•�:�"' Gc,� �c�- / ;�td�it - Sff�itlGt_�'.: t r s t •t r _ Ir �• • { F y t . •��� �.., - ice` r / .� � ' .'. v -' lk .i•;: ,v r `.s M s•__!�V c, a`,1 f .� -� � - a - ��` v���,.R� LI • ,T i�+.r ` .ate t- ^� � l •� �• � _ - .. 1 ti , - � ;a =: .. .�� �! _ t:...��� :.y- _ _. •. '�+� r.,� _ ..: a•a ..•. ti; 1 - _ .. .. .. _.. .. - �. 7 Via' _ • . _4 ,� ,:�T. .,a ;1+�.'I wE^1 -. • v` .y - �I _ • . . �'"r ;. :.i..� F.,�„Y,:. -,y� {T _ M�•M�.�J•• �. t.�r..:.._ _ _ _ •. - + • ` - +, �f,.E., • `• , :K �.. `.�Ssar 71_ ' 'a''. YZ• .!. ...._ _ ..r...� .�i'... � <w i i�.�. �a•^' � • r� . .. . , .r. .. �.. . _ �.._ _ s. •'_." ..i..W.`►�...•.�. +.N ..rs: - -' •- .. .. . _ -' 'a f - �a _ - w,_ ';, } a irr•s •'^ � : t'� .,re:Ixti„ �' 3. •"'` s : :1. v.. ! 't - :.fir' •r . ..�•.. ..r �a.•..n - __.w ..�,.._._..r »:..r.- N.e•c -...:_ �. �. .. - . - .. ` r Y ....x�t t,�. d•`"�:'T - «t" ^fi. +.,,,S..e••g•...�:�'a.... _ _ •4. ^� - 'w _ .. -. _ _ - - .-. 1 _ .a tr +•'..,. -y+ , _ ,.2..� ' jM.:..e- tGt :' _ - _'�"•L.al:''W!.!t r "' �T: •S_ _ a... .,_ - {,...r _ - _ __ .. ' (�'� • _ - •x•1•' st'r. ►._7�a.f„•i �� 1Yhic� _�_, +• .... ;� �s'f:._ •• 1 +M -... -r � - -•. .. _ �z. _ . -� .. - r .'.T•' _ _.._ .� V ' .. 1• . ...',•a:'.•Mt' 4 - - • s y: qty - ",�di. ` 7• � .''a`'4':�.i :7►: A ' •':,. k ::. � a �. •= - - ••'. � ......� .� ' ` - - --- t: - .. � - _ _ .., �. <- :..- -. s .w•�:`�� ,f'f. .. -. �'. = C:•`_.+ .{r .. .wry... _.. ' w:.•w,.,•.... + ,. - a:- ti -.. '"'s`_ "- '3rk 3+:Y"w•" e74' 'y;.. - ' ., c.-�. �3' "" .. ^�..a. �--.. , n. - - - _ _ -. - r '"_ ' r _ , c •r _ = ' ae �•�,.,��, +' l Y� ••Y V ✓ a rw �:� Z?''i� ' :�• S • �.�q� e a :: r .. ,,, .sa� • S! t '�. ` y .... _ �� uq •7� :�'tj�• • -1S iii: n• _ :.kl: ii . _ . _ - _�i". .; •(1' -/w`•.' 'h ;' � «. +X - - v :i3�Z r.'tiva... - • ... ;'G '� . -f.` - - fir -a3 .- 't .. ., • b - tee. ° {• t'ya�^ ` .. i+. ' r - -, _ .' . ' "� - •�= •��• „ti,Y+�+��7( }Yx • ' a � ia- 7+y+ ~a; �� .. � ; b I .. ': � -�� _ ` ?-4 � �"' r - �+a•,.w. -_ • . c at` ! q . ..rh ., " •'e- ' i • - � , r� w T '•"C' i f h �L ti • = ta i • r 't .7 -.. "i '.�`. :Y .. t r: a' ,.f . mow. �• ` • `• ,- ra •- _ - � yy�� ♦ [ .. r • :�►< y' 11 fir. '.4. 4 �Y -ri• - ` �{ r . •_ .t �1� y S J� - • -A Y' ilRo - i �:?• Yc:."1 -.. •�• ±[,71�y Tr' T '`i°a t� n• +. - .i T1+-ti.' _ < 's"_ i •� .f r 1 r.. � - �KsX2F: � .�-t•' ♦ +:i~ - _ '� • '• � � ".'�. ,.D• • y'.h -' �_ `s. ., . JUL 17 1M r MEMORANDUM TO: x " City Manager FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson SUBJECT: Plan Amendment (OS and S to LSC, RH and . RM) LOCATION: White Bear Avenue and County Road C APPLICANT /OWNER:. Smith Investment Properties DATE: August 15 , 19 8 5 Action b Endorsed SUMMARY odifle Request Dateftafte N' Amendment of the land use plan from OS, open space and S, school to LSC, limited service commercial, RH, residential high density and RM, residential medium density. Reason for the Request Harmony School has been closed and sold to the applicant. The OS and S land use designations or obsolete and must be changed before redevelopment can occur, Proposal 1. Refer to the concept development plan on P g a e 10b. 2. Refer to the applicant's letter on page 11. ..3* The site would be redeveloped in two P hases: Phase I: a. The LSC land use designation is proposed for the portion of the Harmony School building that fronts on County Road C, to convert it to an office and retail mall. The older portion of the school, closest to White Bear Avenue would be torn dawn. b . The RH land use designation is proposed to add on to the remainder of the school building to create a 52 --unit rental building for senior citizens. The stage and auditorium would be retained for an activity and recreation area* Phase II: The RH and RM land use plan designations are proposed for a three -story 64 --unit rental building with underground parking. The monthly rents would range between $500 and $700. This unit would not necessarily be restricted to the elderly. 4. Once the land use plan is amended, the applicant will request zoning and site plan approval. Comments It is hard to tell how , much of the neighborhood objection is aimed at the closing of the school and how much is aimed at the project itself, The closing of the school is not an issue here. The school board.. closed the. school and sold the property. The. board, at their last meeti.ng , reaf f i'rmed their decision,* The board's attorney also stated that their purchase agreement does not limit use of the site' to senior housing In regard to the proposed development concept, it is consistent with land use plan policies for establishing or amending land use districts. These policies include. compatibility with site and the surround i ng uses. ( See pages 3 and 4.) Overall units were reduced from the original proposal to be more compatible with the adjoining single dwellings and to allow enough parking. The resulting senior and family housing would also help the city move closer to achieving its housing plan goals. Recommendation (at least four votes are required for approval) Approve the enclosed resolution (page 13) to amend the land use plan for the former Harmony School property from S , school and OS, open space to LSC, limited service commercial, RH, residential high density and RM, residential medium density .on the basis that: 1. This land has been declared as excess property and sold by the school district making the OS, open space and S, school designations obsolete. 20 The LSC and RH designations are compatible with the adjoining commercial and open space uses. The RM designation provides an orderly transition to nearby single -- dwelling properties. 30 The site fronts on White Bear Avenue and County Road C, each with the capability to provide safe and adequate access for the proposed uses. 4. The proposed senior and family housing is needed to achieve the city's 1980 to 1990 housing plan goals for low -to-- moderate and modest- income households. 2 Site Description Area: 8.52 acres BACKGROUND, Existing land .use : the former Harmon School s Harmony tructure and two softball diamonds ion or e s-iae, - that - . are . _used:... by .- North S t .. - Paul and: Maplewood* - p for - recreation'. programs, Surrounding Land Uses North: Ramsey County open space East: a single dwelling on a 200 x 630 foot arcel p The south half is planned for RL, residential low density use and the north half is planned for OS, open space. South: County Road Co Across the street is Ramsey County .open space, a single dwelling that is planned for SC, service commercial use and commercial uses on the corner of White Bear Avenue. West: a convenience mini -mall, with as um ' g pumps fronting on White Bear Avenue t Past Actions 10-- 7-82: Council amended the designation of the former Hazelwood School site to RB, residential business for a combination office building and nd senior citizen housing development. The RB designation g on allows high density housing. Single dwellings and park land surround the site, Planning 1. Land use plan designation: resen g p t OS , open space and S, school; proposed -- -LSC, limited sery ice commercial RH residential h dense • ► sidential high density, RM, residential medium density, zoning: present -- -F, farm residence 1 3. Policies from the plan: 1. a. Page 12 -11 0 High density residential areas should be located adjacent to or close to collector or arterial roadways b. Page 18 -1.0: Locate multi le--fa ' p mi ly housing in areas . not inferior to-those generally - for conventional sin le famil housing. g y C.0 Page 18 --31: The LSC, limited commercial center classific- ation refers to commercial facilities on a neighborhood g scale. K Heavy industr uses, department stores motels, p , e s, auto accessory stores, etc, would . be prohibited, while other land uses of a medium intensity nature would be permitted subject ect to meeting P J eting certain performance standards. do Page, 18--30 The RH, residential h.i h densit classification ' g y ification is designated for such housing types as apartments, two.- famil. Y homes , -town houses, nursing homes, dormator i, es or elder 1 y housing. The maximum population d ensity is 34- - people per net acre e. Page 18 --30: The RM, residential medium density classific -- ation is designated for such housing types as single-family g YP houses on small lots, two - family homes, town houses and mobile homes. The maximum population density is 22 people P er net acre. f. Page 18 -5: Transitions between distinctly y types of land uses shall be accomplished in an orderly fashion which does not create a negative impact on adjoining developments. 40 Hou sing: a. Page C-3: Senior citizen housing should be located: 1) In a residential district but with good access to commercial facilities and services, such as rocer stores, g y drugstores, medical clinics and passive recreational areas 2) So that there would be quick response. . of emergency g ency services (i.e. medical, ambulance, police and fire) 3) Near public transportation b. 1980 to 1990 goals from the Maplewood housing - p ing plan. 1) Page C -31: 785 new modest -cost housing g units are to be provided. As of December 31, 1984, 154 of the 785 units had been achieved. Modest -cost monthl . rent are defined Y as between $575 to $600 (1984)0 2) Page C--32: 620 new low -to- moderate income housing units are to be provided. As of December 13, 1984 394 of the 620 units had been provided. Low --to- moderate income monthly rent is defined as not exceeding $575 (1984)0 3) The applicant is proposing monthly ents of between $500 and Y 5. The city as sessors of Coon Rapids and Brooklyn Center have ve done periodic studies that show that multiple e dwellings do not devalue u adjacent single dwellings. A study by the Bosclair Corporation p in Bloomington from 1960 -70 found that homes adjacent to apartments . . appreciated at a slightly higher rate than homes that.were not adjacent to apartments. A stud done b • Y y North Star Appraisal �n 198 for Orin Thompson Homes found that quads had no effect on adjacent single - dwelling home values or the time it took to sell these homes. 4 This sales study was based on two quad projects in Savage and Apple Valley. A 1984 study by Lafayette and Pierce, Inc. for Castle Design found that the proposed Sterling Glen apartments in Maplewood would not affect the marketability or . value of adjacent ' homes , 60 Permitted density: if changed to RH , residential -high dens i ty - =34 people /net- .. acre. I f changed to RM, residential medium dens i ty -22 people /net acre, Public.Work l . Public water should be taken only from the St. Paul system because of the complaints of 1-ow water pressure from people in the vicinity who are hooked up to the North St. Paul water system. 2. According to the city engineer, the traffic generated by this development would be adequately handled by the upgraded capacity of the intersection of White Bear Avenue and County Road C with street widening and turn lanes, 30 White Bear Avenue is designated as a major arterial and roadway and County Road C is designated as a major collector street in this area. ` Parks On May 20, 1985, the parks commission recommended to the developer that they should give consideration to keeping the ball diamonds in use until they have to be vacated. The commission would also like to go on record as recommending to the city council that this project have more open and recreation space for its residents. Citizen Comments Twenty- -four property owners within 350 feet of this proposal were asked their opinion of the May 6,1985 site plan (page 10) . Fourteen responses were received- -two owners are in favor, two had no comment and nine are opposed for the following reasons: 1. Apartment buildings are incompatible with a location near single dwellings because of increased noise, traffic, invasion of privacy -.( trespass problems) . 2. The proposed density is too high. 30 The traffic would agg revate the already dangerous intersection of County Road C and White Bear Avenue. 40 If the gym and stage are to remain available.for larger gatherings additional parking should be provided. 59 There is need to provide additional outdoor amenities for seniors, including garden plots, grass, trees, picnic tables and to site the parking lots away from the views from these units, as much as possible. 0 i In response to, these concerns, the applicant changed part of Phase II from RH to RM and reduced the density in Phase I from 56 to 52 units, Other concerns will be addressed when the site plan is reviewed as part of the planned unit development process. . Procedure ` 1. Planning commission . recommendation fallowing a ,public hearin g 20 City council decision .30 Metropolitan council review for impact on metropo.1itan systems.. jc Attachments . 10 Hazelwood Neighborhood Land Use Plan Ma (existing) P ( g) 2. Hazelwood Neighborhood Land Use Plan Map (proposed) 30 Property Line /Zoning Map 40 Site plan sent out for public comment 50 Proposed site plan 6. Letter of justification 7. Resolution I. r • Interchange Interchange Principal arterial 894 1ladnals Heights • — sulim 1 Co. Rd. 0 major colle or BW RB t ` ma jor N DQ , ... collector M •..• �, major collector - : - ti m 1 Lte ..... WANIJ - _ I I c SC- -��Ii1 1 B w • -SC Q R I 1 s ' b J ' ' + ' ( �'' • rte_ � / . fiI `----' RB• • -CAS .. -, COW - of �rtetrt 1 t • !� r •-, r ,,, t WAS o C% 0S 0 t , _ - SC - - -_ B p , J Major coke W An C )w w. L 'Bw •� j- a + B w 4S C : X M _ --,a T / al Ad H g h� Y `� } m , ....... In r ha go C 0 _ 4v C a. o m v '' > •• o W m < C O 0 0 t 3 HAZE NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN Existi Use 7 Attachment one 4 N r V f.!. Interchange Interchange Principal arterial 894 :. Vadnals Heights _ Emu � - Co. Rd. major coils or L- BW RB ,. l � � mat °r � �Ci �� _ co J n•wt..w� ; IL major collector 1 m,, e Lie da Eq RM - - - �.J t All _ .. Ls • b/ , ' ` , 1 Iii �- _ f / 3 ' i R Q- ""� • j + 3 F Rol i o f le 1 t • ----- r .�...�. P.. C% _ • t f �, , _ _ , s� - _,; -1 KO i� B W 1 J �► L SC M a o i * t 1 colle �tl� 6► � V R i * [ • r� III �i �ararirrs�Cmtar= BW M t , 1 W SC f a ffid _.._ H 9 ha Y 3 I 'V m ...... in r ha ge C a e r 4v 'C a. v O o 0 `' > - O uJ m .• C C ° o w •- E HAZELWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PROPOSED LAND USE R Attachment two Q N UAJ * 2 5 C 8 1 2 45 i f � J o $ o i 56 I IG 9 o C� /) oio �• It l Q � V t . 63 ABC LA A IV O (3) 1.01 �.. C'0 ' (��� o F - - • � o c V N S • ` 4-0 Q 0 ---a- .9 - 4-95 1.3 2 arc . o 2. 92 , c o o =J ' O A M a C> 40 0 a � 5 ) (4) �- W YN , U WAD 2- 17 14 '% �. N t Ma l ewood Covenant i0 6 u nit mu ltipl e dwe l 1 i n g ' P Church • �. t 9b ac.. 4 . 2 ISO PHASE II 3 I Co3 Ilk WA48 �► 3 ti ' U u 52 senior housing units , Les''s Superette -.., • ti PHASE I := • Lt • SGti 'r ►i i:.'R�`•_tiu • .__.. •, . 2Z Former Harmony School bui 1 di ng� 1 ' 200 20 lon IF Ain AL Sam mom r ..ni.. 2.633112 f 19. 4 Iva j l6,.500+ s r _ qua e feet of. off i ce /retai 1 . i 1 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Attachment three 4 N • '� • if �• • - !l _ r ell ee- It IN 12• _ •' _ Ill Ire ° �! 1 1• '� • N � I ' 4L g It xd 04 • ` y 1 ♦ .` ' r J— .I i VE 14 lo All A o 1> V al el a \ V r 1 D ''Y sf �> > r Y � R ' l : trcr <�(s i tno�► .�� •'' •�' �, � _ _. ,��`• 1 ;'.. � / _ IIIII�.I.II.HIIN � � v� � ••.. 1 a 3 ; sT� � f ,,� �, �� �' •.tip °'h th � N3 C 1 .j � �. s IP � w • 11 � � j � 1• „ ` r N 4 W � Ile n ' t3 5 -6 -85 site plan Sent out for public comment 10 Attachment four. ' tea � � � .. - -• • t j . . • -cis , - lop of me { J1 ,PHA S • • � • � - �.. .... - . , . _ .. - . ' t lsw• C1 AIt1 0_2 C tt 1 _ I r lb fit 'V vc 10446 — a!; twit s - . �1.: a• .+iv L t• 74 M = ' . •. = Iftr R GAL S1ijTINYESTMENT .. PROPERTIES HAUMONT •SCHOOL SITE (8.52 ACRES) /ow - - : ' PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN STUDY, sccic: 10-40 • • ANTHONY A o DANNA ATTORNEY AT LAW 516 ' NORTHERN FEDERAL BUILDING WABASHA AT SIXTH STREET . SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 612- 224 -5759 May. 6, 1985 - City of Maplewood 1902 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: Development of Harmony • School Site Gentlemen: Submitted herewith for our consideration ' Y' n please find the following: Conditional Use or PUD Ap plication Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application List of Property Owners Preliminary Site Plan Filing Fees. The applicant herein is Smith Investment Properties, , a Minnesota Partnership consisting of Bret M. Smith N. Russell Smith th and Norman P e Smith, The firm has retained the undersigned as Attorney, ' 9 t ney , and the firm of Ackermann and Associates of St. Paul as Architects for t e of aiding e purpos ng it In the development of the abandoned Harmon School Site at Whi Bear Avenue a nd County Road e ' � . Market Studies performed b the firm i ' y ndi cate a need In the area f or multi. family 1 and z bedroom apartments* The developers elopers . intend to use the existing structures by converting the existing classrooms into the apartments, g cla rooms p tments . A portion of the existing structure which runs parallel to County Road C. is not suitable for apartme ' ' P ent conversion , and since it's s felt that the complex will support. certain service oriented commerci s ac+e the developers thusly. P • elopers have designated such space ..,The :developers are extreme l sensi i • Y t ve to the concept of preservation of the neighborhood and to working with the conun �. • un ty as a whole in a positive and constructive manner. T will be open pen to suggestions r - from neighbors, staff, council and community with respect to the deve lopment of the property to its highest and best use, and look forward to becoming a , part. , of said community. ve truly ours', ANT Y DANNA At orney at Law AAD : as Encl. 12 RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Smith .Investment Properties initiated an amendment to the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan from OS, open space. and S, school to LSC, limited. service commercial, RH, residential high densit , and RM Y , residential , medium . for- the following -- described property: Y Unplatted <. eland beginning at . in•tersection of , :White � Bear Avenue and South .line of SW 1/4 thence norther on said centerline: 420.55 et, thence east parallel with said South line 311 feet, thence - northerly parallel with said centerline' 140 feet, thence ' due north 107-a07 feet, thence east 391.55 feet to point 658.95 feet north from said South line thence to said South line at point 200 feet west of said 1/4 corner, thence west to beginning•; subject to roads, in Section 2 Township 29, Range 22 This property is more commonly escribed as the former Y Harmony Elementary School. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this P lan amendment is as follows: 1. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing ,Tune 17, 1985 to consider this 1 on plan amendment. Notice thereof was publ i shged and mailed pursuant to law. All ersons resent at said P P hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and resent written t P ten statements. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said plan amendment be 2. The Maplewood City Council considered said lan p amendment on 1985. The council considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above -- described plan amendment be approved on the basis of PP the following findings of fact: 10 This land has been declared as excess property and sold b P Y Y the school district making the OS, open space and S school designations obsolete. 20 The LSC and RH designations are compatible with the adjoining commercial and open space uses. The RM designation gnation provides an orderly transition to nearby single- dwellin g properties, 3. The site fronts on White Bear.Avenue and Count Road C each Y , with. the capability to provide safe and ade uate access for q the proposed - uses. 4. The proposed senior.-and family housing is needed to achieve the city's 1980 to 1990 housing plan goals for low -to- moderate and modest -cost households. Adopted this day of ' , 19850 Seconded by Ayes -- 1 AL.L__L___a_. ,er r MEMORANDUM Aotion by Coon l 0 Endo rse ....,.�,. TO: Ci Manager FROM: Director of Community Devel opment - SUBJECT: Code Amendment -- Parking DATE: August 15, 1985 Council gave first reading to this ordinance on August 12, sub ject to l eaving ninety degree parking stalls at ten by twenty feet. This change has been made in the enclosed Staff recommends, however, that this change not be made. The reason for the change is to make it easier to turn into a ninety degree parking space .in the winter. This may be true; however, ninety degree parking requires a 24 —foot wide aisle for two —way traffic, while 60 or 45 degree parking onl has to have 19 or 16 feet of width for one —way traffic.. The extra aisle width . requi red for ninety degree parking provides enough room to make a comfortable turn in the winter. Nine —foot parking stall widths are especially helpful for small businesses who need ninety degree parking, because of limited space for continuous drives. Nine —foot wide stalls makes it easier for them to meet the code ,requirements for minimum number of spaces and landscaped setbacks. The city has approved ninety degree, nine —foot wide stalls for the following uses: 9- 23 -80: Maplewood Movies (space limitations) 1.0- 1 -81:. Maplewood East Shopping Center (council also allowed 49 -ei ght —foot wide compact stalls) 4 -9 -85: Nordstrand Clinic addition on Cope Avenue (space limitations Staff has not received any complaints on these parking lots. mb Enc. MEMORANDUM r ' i I TO: City Manager er g FROM: Thomas Ekstrand --- Associate Planner SUBJECT: Code Amendment- -- Parking APPLICANT* City of Maplewood DATE: August 14, 1985 SUMMARY Request Amendment of the general parking requirements for commercial and multiple dwelling. Reasons for the Request 1. The parking requirements in the CO, commercial office district require 25% more parking than any other commercial district. 2. Council asked staff to determine if the number of arkin spaces p g for retail uses may be inadequate, because of problems with Sound of Music on Beam Avenue. 3. our parking stall size, requirements rements are 'overly restrictive, q y tractive. 4. Curbing requirements are required by policy, olic , but not included in ordinance. Comments l Office Parking: The study on office parking came about from a request for a zone e f • q e change from CO to LBC, limited i ted business commercial for the proposed office site between NCR and Mr. Steak on Sloan Place. This proposed two -story office building could not provide enough parking under CO regulations, but could under LBC requirements. Based on the survey results on page 10, the most widely used parking formula for off ices is one space, required for each 200 square feet of floor area. Planners in these surveyed cities find that this formula works well. The 1: 200 square -f oot formula is the same as Ma P lewood' s current requirement except that Maplewood his a less restrictive formula (one space -for each 3.00 square.. feet) for upper floors. There is -no reason why upper f loor f loor off ice space should need less parking than office space on the main floor. This separate upper floor area requirement should be ' el iminated . 2. Retail Parking: The retail" parking requirements are being reviewed because of the Sound of Music store's need for additional parking space. Sound of Music is exceeding Maplewood's parking requirements by two spaces, but their parking is inadequate. The examples below are to help evaluate if other stores in Maplewood are experiencing the same problem. Comments based* on Store Spaces Spaces Provided Observation Sound of Music 31 33 (1:188 sq, ft.) insuff icient arkin P g Hirshfields 117 140 (1:167 sq.ft.) always excess parking Maplewood Square 228 235 (1:193 sq. f t .) enough parking g Other than the Sound of Music, there has not been any problem with. Maplewood's current retail parking requirement. The code should not be changed. Requiring increased parking for all retail uses would. create an excess of parking for future stores and shopping centers and be an unnecessary cost of development. 30 Parking Stall. Dimensions: Maplewood has no uniform parking stall size requi rments . Staff is proposing that parking stalls be permitted to be nine feet wide which is the most accepted standard today, based on the survey y results on page 120 Sixty -five percent of these cities permitted this width space, The only problem with reducing the parking space width to nine feet is that door nicks could potentially increase. Although this is a disadvantage, nine foot spaces are still very adequate p y q e safe. Eighteen --foot deep spaces, when abutting a curb, sidewalk or landscaped area, would suffice, since cars typically overhang and the space on beyond p e to two feet. Even the larger vehicles, like the 18.5 --foot long Chevrolet Kingswood Estate Wagon (see page 4 ), would only need a parking space 16.5 to 17.5 feet deep. The aisle widths staff has proposed for the various angles of parking space arrangement were derived from a arkin stud P g Y prepared by the engineering firm of Barton -- Aschman . A letter of support from the Joseph Company is enclosed on page 15. 4. Curbing: Staff is also proposing to formalize in ordinance, our current policy of requiring continuous concrete curbing around parking lots. This requirement is important because: 2 a.- Concrete curbing holds up longer. Bituminous and timber curbs are susceptible to amage by snowplows and are generally much shorter lived , ,. theref ore , there is much less of. a maintenance problem with concrete. b. Continuous curbing is important tant to contain and direct p rest storm . water run -off and also serves as a wheel stop to protect landscaping. The park and recreation commission recommends that city parks be exempt-from the curbing requirement. (see enclosed minutes and memo from the director of community services, pages 17 and 1$ The community design review recommended. against exempting parks because it would allow a double standard The staff recommends a compromise -- requiring curbing only in parks with parking lots that are used in the winter. Curbing gets most of its abuse in winter from snow plows. Recommendation Approval of the attached code amendment regarding inimum parking u i rements . R g p g re q (Recommendations of the community design review board are included, except for the curbing requirement rement for parks.) q p ) K BACKGROUND Past Action 11- 28 -83: Council amended , the off- street parking regulations in a multiple . . dwelling district (Section 36 -109) to read: "Minimum parking stall size . shall be ten (10) feet by. twenty (20) feet, except. that parking stalls .-f or owner- occupied units may be reduced to nine (9) by eighteen (18) feet." Sample of Car Dimensions Make Dimensions (width /length in feet) VW Bug 5 x 13.5 Mercury Linx 5.5 x 14 VW Rabbit pickup 5 x 14.5 Dodge Aries 5.5 x 14.5 Oldsmobile Omega 5.5 x 14.5 Ford F 100 ( full size pickup) 6.5 x 16.5 Ford van 6.5 x 17 Chevrolet Caprice 6.5 x 17.5 Ford Torino _ 6 5 x 17.5 Chevrolet Kingswood Estate Wagon 6.5 x 18.5 Surveys Four surveys are attached and their results are summarized as follows. 10 Office parking requirements- -the most frequently applied parking requirement is one space for each 200 square feet. of floor area. 2. Retail arki�n p g rquirements -- -the most commonly applied formulas are one space for each 150 square feet and one space for each 200 square feet. 3. Parking space dimensions- -the most often required parkin g stall dimension is a nine by twenty -foot space, .4. Of the 28 cities surveyed, fourteen cities required concrete curbing in their park parking lots; ten do not • three do not require, q re, but encourage it; and one city installs concrete curbing only along the portion of parking lot that fronts on the right -of -way. 1 Recommendation by the community design review board 2. First reading by the city council 3. Second reading and hearing by the city council mb Attachments: 1. Ordinance amendment 20* Office parking survey 3. Retail parking survey 4. Parking space dimension survey 5. Curbing Survey (park parking lots) 6. Survey — manufacturing and warehouse parking 7. Letter: Joseph Co. 8. Memo: Curbing 9. Parks Commission minutes 10. CDRB minutes r,� ORDINANCE N0, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section, L. Section 36. -22 is amended as follows (additions are underlined and .deletions are crossed out) Section 36 --22. ,Off - street parking. (a . z- —t r\ le l t^1 1 Y � & pae es y tW �,... r� • , Qh a m a .i n- - - • 3--i The types of g yp uses shall provide additional off-- street parking space, as indicated unless otherwise author i zed by the city council, A11 off, Li parking space shall have proper access from a street or alley and shall be located on or near the lot on which such use is situated: (1) Single-family dwelling: Two (2) spaces, as provided above. ( 2 ) Multiple d w e l l i n g : Two (2) spaces for each housekeeping P eeping unit. One of these spaces must be enclosed. — (3) Hotel or tourist cabin court: One space for each rental ntal room or suite. (4) Restaurant, cafe or tea room: One * s ace for each ' P fifty (50) square feet of floor space devoted to patron use. (5) Theater,-auditorium, church or other lace of public P P assemblage: A minimum of one space for every four (4) seats Schools must have a minimum of one space for every twenty (20 ) auditorium seats. (6) Commercial office or recreational building use other , than those specified above ' e a t: One space for each two hundred ( 200) square feet, or portion thereof, of -e-� floor area? , n.1 1I an space squa ' .one t1anj1_4zAnr1_ foQ� (7) Shopping centers having enclosed, nonleasable common areas: one space for each two hundred (200) square feet, or portion thereof, of leasable floor area, (8) {-x-31 Manufacturing and warehouse establishments: One space for each two (2)° employees -, or one Mace for each 400 square f eet of manufacturin spa ce and one spa ce for each i are feet of _warehouse s ace whichever is reat Of f - street parking facilities existing at the effective date of ' this paragraph (June 22, 1972) shall not subsequently be reduced to an amount less than that required under this paragraph for a s im ' lar new building or use. Off street parking facilities provided to comply with the provi'tJons of this paragraph shall not subsequently be Attachment 1 5 reduced below 'the the requirements of this paragraph, .. � eft A. • • . . . • , xx A. -r e e- R ic Jr. --- (9) .'Motor Fuel Stations: Four 4 spaces, lus three 3 additional �- spaces for each service stall. If there is a convenience store or restaurant associated with ' the fuel station, - additional parking shalt be provided in accordance with this section (b) Ninety degree parking spaces shall be at least ton feet wide and twenty feet long All other spaces shall be not less than nine feet wide and nineteen feet in length (measured parallel with the striping lines) , exclusive of access aisles If a parki g s _ace abuts a curb, sidewalk or landsca�" ped area, the require en7g7t 7 of t e space ma be reduced b one foot. S. . c All s aces shall be served by access aisles of the folio idths based on the an le ' of the 2arking stal ls• . Parking Angle Aisl e Width. 90 degree 24 fe (t w o -way ' 0 _ o way traffic) d ear.-e 19 feet (one -way traffic __45 de -ee 16 feet one --wa traffic d All lots shall have continuous con ' Crete curbin surround ing�th_e ex terior Perimeter of the lot and drives . Park_ P arking lots that are not used in the winter, oarkincf l otg having twelve or less are exempt from this re ui cement unless re uired by the city engineer for draina ge control. L e) All shall be continual) and r o er1 maintained. Section 2. Section 36 -140 (g--j) of the CO, commercial office district, regulations are amended as follows deletions o ( are crossed ut) ' • • MCI r • • -- - mo • •_ • • • � M r • q ae-- -fee -t ogres no -- Lighting: All lighting shall be designed and located so as to .confine . direct rays to the premises. Lighting standards shall not exceed a height of fifteen (15) feet. Lighting standards and fixtures shall be of a design and of materials that are compatible with the architecture and the landscape architecture of the site. -ex area a wall not z ap a- WV . . . e nt (h.) -(- 1 Uses confined to structure: All uses shall, unless otherwise specified, be contained entirely within a completely enclosed structure. Parking facilities are exempted from this requirement. (Ord. No. 380, s 104, 1-- 16 --75; Ord. No. 529, s 4, 11- 22 -82) Section 3. Section 36 --172 (7) , (8) and (9) of the SC, shopping center district regulations are amended as follows (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out) : o g ross -floo-r- area.. devlqte� use (7) - Parking, loading or service areas used by motor vehicles shall be located entirely within the lot lines of the shopping center, shall be physically separated from public streets and shall have no more than two (2) accessways to any one public street. All accessways shall be located at least one hundred (100) feet from the intersection of any street lines* �(8) The city council may prescribe more restrictive conditions or any further reasonable conditions deemed appropriate with respect to the suitability of . the shopping center in the neighborhood. (Code 1965, s 908.020; Ord, No. 529, s 8, 11- 22 --82) Section 4. Sections 36 --156 and 36 --157 of the fuel station ordinance shall be amended as follows ( additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): 7 Section 36 =-156 • Motor fuel stations --- Generally. All automobile garages, motor fuel. stations and other businesses vid' fuel -or service for motor vehicles shall be classified pro a. ng accordin to the classes set forth in Section 367 -1'-51 of this division g and shall be placed upon a site having the area and treatment as provided in Section 36 -151 and Sections 36 --157- 8 through, 36 --161 of �� this division. (Ord. No. .232 4 ( 9907. , 030 ) , 10-19-67) 7)� Its L �w ; . — . • — • • r r •• — a r • • • r r 1�• • r r • _ • ——� " • • qr Ir Mr • • t 01 A. • 0 ld) A i • ~� • IF A ( • L ama I • • • • • • • Section 5. Section 36 -109 of the multiple - dwelling district parking regulations ulations shall be amended as follows .(additions are g underlined and deletions are crossed out) : Section 36-109 • Same- -Off- street parking. Each multiple-dwelling unit in the city shall have off-street parking space. Parking spaces shall be in addition to, and not part of , the driveways or-maneuvering space necessary to the parking areas serving such multiple dwelling• All parking spaces, driveways and other parts of the parking facilities shall., be dust free and shall be surfaced with concrete or blacktop. 1- parking requirements shall be as follows: we 1-3 i act unit j 8 r ' An .open parking stall shall be a minimum distance of f teen feet from a dwelling unit window and five 5 ) feet from any side or rear arlwatting property line. s ^Y r oa Y - (2) Parking stalls may. not B within fifteen feet of a ' street rights --of --way, unless Section 36--27 applies s a a. va Y- (3) Where a garage or carport opens to a public stree.t the with of the driveway onto that public street shall not exceed twenty -four (24) feet in width, and in no event shall a series of garages open directly to that street. Where a series of es a face each other ar g g on a private road, the minimum width separating garages shall be thirty (30) feet in order to provide visibility in backing out or turning around. (Code 1965, § 906.070; Ord- No. 231, S 1 10- -5 -67; Ord. No. 245, S 4 ( §906.030) , 10-3-68; Ord. No. 555, 9 2 11- 28 -83) (4) Pnrki n n C hat 1 a an �o I. ...i..: ... Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Counc this day of - , 1985. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Ayes-- Nays__ SURVEY OFFICE PARKING REQUIREMENTS ( Spaces Per Square Foot) Maplewood - -1: 200 (first floor) plus 1 :300 (u ez f loors --in most PP ) districts. 1:150 in CO districts Coon Rapids -- -1:300 Roseville- -l:200 'Burnsville- -1:150 for buildings under 6,000 square feet 1:200 for buildings over 6,000 square feet Plymouth - -1:200 Brooklyn Center - -1:20 Fridley -- -1:25 Blaine - -1:20 Crystal - -3 spaces plus 1:200 i New Brighton - -1:200 New Hope -- -3 spaces plus 1:200 Golden Valley -- -1:250 White Bear Lake ----3 spaces plus 1:200 Apple Valley - -1 :150 for the first 6,000 square feet 1 :200 if over 6,000 square feet South St. Paul ---1:300 Eagan - -1:150 Maple. Grove -- 1:250 Columbia Heights - -1:200 for the first 6,000 square feet 1:250 if over 6, OOO square feet Cottage Grove -- -1:200 West St. Paul - -1 :150 for the first 6,OOO square feet , 1:200 if over 6,000 square feet North St. Paul 1:150 Oakdale--6:1000 (1:167) for the first 20 square feet Newport -- -1:200 Vadnais Heights -- 6:1000 (1 :167) for the first 20,OOO square feet 1:200 if over 20,000 square feet St. Paul - -1:200 Attachment Two SURVEY RETAIL PARKING REQUIREMENTS ( Spaces Per Square Foot*) Maplewood -- -1:200 (first floor) and 1:300 (additional floors) Burnsville- 1: Roseville - -1:200 Coon Rapids - -1:200 Plymouth - -1:200 Brooklyn Center- -1:125 Fridley - - 1:150 Crystal - -1:140 New Brighton - -1:200 i New Hope - -1:150 Golden Valley - -1:150 White Bear Lake - -1:200 Apple Valley- -1:150 South St. Paul -- -1:100 Eagan - -1:150 Maple Grove - -1:200 Columbia Heights - -1:200 Cottage Grove -- -1:150 .Shoreview - - .5 :1000 (1:182) .Oakdale--1:200 Woodbury -- -1:185 Newport -- 1:151 (plus one for each employee) Vadnais Heights - -1:200 St. Paul - -1:150 Blaine --- 11 Attachment Three Y r PARKING SPACE DIMENSION SURVEY 8- -30 -83 Stall Dimensions when Parking Stall abutting curb, sidewalk City 'Dimensions or landsca ed area Aisle ' p Wid th Coon Rapids 9 x 18 9 x 16 24 Eagan 10 x 20 10 x 18 24 Brooklyn Center 8 1 Ix 19.5 8' 8 18 24 Vadnais Heights 9 x 18. 9 x 16 24 St. Paul 9 x 18 9 x 16 20 (8 x 16 compact Burnsville 9 x .18 no change 24 Plymouth 9 x 18.5 " 26 Fridley 10 20 " 25 Bla ine 9 x 20 24 Cr Crystal Y 9.5 x 20 �� 24 New Brighton 9 =x 20 22 New Ho Hope p 10 x 20 �� 24 Golden Valley 9 x 20 " No s p ecif ied White Bear Lake 8.5 x 20 requirement 24 Ap ple Valle PP y l� x 2� �� 24 South St. Paul 9 x 20 �� 24 Roseville 9 x 18 �� 24 Columbia Heights 9 x 20 � 22 Cottage Grove 9 x 20 " No s p ecified Shoreview 9 x 20 requirement No. St. Paul 9 x 2 0 ,� 24 No. spec i f ied Oakdale 9 x 20 requirement Woodbury 9 x 20 New Newport p 1 x 2 ,24 No spec if f ied requirement Attachment Four 12 Attachment 5 13 r CONCRETE CURBING IN.PARK PARKING LOTS No. Concrete Requi re-s Concrete Curbing Requirement Curb 1. Maplewood x 2. Coon Rapids (only curb along portion that fronts on r, o.w 3. Roseville x 4. Burnsville x (does encourgage it) 5. Plymouth x 6, Brooklyn Center x 7. Fridley x 80 Blaine x (does encourage it g ) 90 Crystal x 10. New Brighton x 11. New Hope x 12. Golden Valley x 13. White Bear Lake X .14. Apple Valley x 159 South St. Paul ' x 16. Eagan x 17. Maple Grove x l8. Columbia Heights x 19. Cottage Grove x (asphalt optional) 20. West St. Paul x 21. Shoreview x 22. North St. Paul x 23. Oakdale x 24. Woodbury x 25. Newport x 260 Lithe Canada x 27. Vadnais Heights x 28. St, Paul x (concrete preferred but not required) 29. Ramsey County x ( does encourage it) Attachment 5 13 SURVEY MANUFACTURING AND WAREHOUSE PARKING 5-- 30 --8.5 l . Maplewood 2-0 Coon Rapids 30 Roseville 4. Burnsville Manufacturing Warehousing *1/2 employees 1/2 employees 1 /each employee on the 1 /each employee on largest shift the largest shift 2/3 employees or 1/1,000 1/2,000 sq* fte sq. ft. whichever is greater 1 /each employee on largest shift plus one for each company 5. Plymouth 1/300 sq, ft. 6. Fridley 1/400 sq. ft. 7 Blaine 1/2 employees or 1/200 sq, ft., whichever is greater 80 Golden Valley 1/500 sq. ft. 9. White Bear Lake 1/350 sq. ft. plus 1/each company vehicle 10. Apple Valley 11. So. St. Paul 1240 Eagan 13. Maple Grove 4 spaces plus 1/800 sq. ft. 1/400 sq. ft. or 1/4 employees, whichever is greater 1/800 sq. ft. 1/350 sq. ft. plus one for each company vehicle 14. Columbia 4 plus l /400 sq. ft. Heights 15. Cottage Grove 4 plus 1/400 sq. ft. 16. Shoreview 1/2,000 sq. ft. *Spaces per number of employees 14 l /each employee on largest shift plus one for each company 1/2,000 sq. ft. 1/2,000 sq. ft, 1/2,000 sq. ft. or 1/2 employees, whichever is greater 1/2,000 sq. ft. 1/1 sq. ft. plus one for each employ- ee on the largest shift. 1/400 sq, ft. (under 6, 000 sq, ft .) 1/800 sq. ft. (over 6,000 sq, ft.) 1/800 sq, ft. or 1/4 employees, whichever is greater 1/800 sq. ft. 1/2 sq. ft. plus one for each company vehicle. 1/400 sq, ft. (under 6,000 sq. ft.) 1/ 1,000 sq ft. (over 6,000 sq, ft. 1/400 sq, ft. (under 6,OOO sq, ft.) 1/ 2,000 sq. ft. (over 6,000 sq, ft. 1,2000 sq. ft. Attachment 6 5001 .NORTH UNIVERSITY STREET / PEORIA, ILLINOIS 61614 / TELEPHONE 309/692 -1135 June 18 , 1985 Mr. Geoff Olsen Planning Director City of Maplewood 1902 E. County Road "B" Maplewood MN 55109 Re: Parking Stall Size Dear Mr. Olsen: Discussions with Tom Ekstrand of your I office has prompte.d,.'.us to write you. Our development of well over one million square feet of commercial properties across the Midwest has taught us valuable guidelines with respect to parking requirements, A recent study by the U.S, Dept. of Transportation indicates that, by 1990, the percent of automobiles in - the U.S. that are compact will be between 70 and 80 percent . When more than one out of two vehicles parked in a shopping center or other development is a compact, it is appropriate to consider special accommodation of these vehicles, Our experience has found most stall width requirements to be 8.5 to 9 ft., recogni zing that with the growing proportion of small vehicles, it is increasingly less likely that two large vehicles will park adjacent -to one another; thus space for opening doors (which governs the required distance between adjacently parked vehicles) and stall width can be reduced, Rearrangement of surface parking area to accommodate the advent of today's car sizes also allows more landscape areas. The tra- ditional ".sea of asphalt" can be made more attractive with the use of landscape. islands The islands are made available by downsizing the area required by the cars UNIVERSITY SQUARE PEORIA FON DULAC PLAZA EAST PEORIA 15 Attachment 7 BARTONVILLE SQUARE BARTONVILLE Mr. Geoff Olsen June 18, 1985 4 Page two We have attempted to illustrate our, experiences which have offered the best solutions to parking development for every- one concerned . If we can assist any further, please call, Best regards, r Monte J . Brannan AIA Corporate Architect MJB : Hkb 16 MEMORANDUM v To: Park and Recreation Commission From: Robert D. Odegard, Di- rector of Community Services Subs Cement.Parking Curbs Required Around All Parking Lots Date:. June 12, 1985 Anl amendment to the minimum parkin requirements of the Cit .'s Ordinance . 9 q y i.nc 1 udes the. 'following : "(d ) All parking 1 ots shall have cont.i nuous concrete curbing surrounding the exterior perimeter of the lot and drive. Parks an parking lots having twelve spaces or less are exempt from this requirement unless required by the City Engineer for drainage control." In the previous sentence, the words "Parks and" were struck out by the Design Review Board. It,was their feeling that parks should be treated as any other business, etc.. in the City and have to construct concrete curbing. Part of their reason- ing for going to concrete curbing was due to the abuse that asphalt curb has taken during the winter when plows have chipped out the asphalt and it has not been repaired in the Spring. .I do not have any real objection to the installation of concrete curbing around parking lots in the parks, however I do feel that the Park and Recrea- tion Commission and myself should have the right to decide what type of curb- 9 YP ing would be most attractive in each park. Attractiveness is always in the "eye of the beholder". While we do have some parking f a c i l i t i e s that are cleaned in the winter at skating rink locations, there are man parking lots Y P 9 that are not cleaned in the winter and therefore the excuse about hitting with snowplows does not apply. I would submit that there are other means of control besides cement curbs for our parks: 1 ) Timbers laid f l a t on the parking surface or used for a timber wall. 2) Curb wheel blocks. 3) Timbers or metal posts inserted similar to fence posts and where needed P planking attached to the timbers. 4) Fencing such as chainlink, woven wire, wood decorative fence metal P late guardrails, 5) Simple chain or cable. 6) Berms which can be either dirt or, rock with attractive landscaping p g pl anted in them. 7) A slight swale. 8) Plantings such as shrubs, trees, hedges, vines. 9) Proper striping where the lot is basically used in the summer. 10) Large stones or boulders. l l ) Brick walls or brick flower Parks are like people - each one is an individual and should be panne its greatest potential. It is my recommendation that the Plan- planned and developed to ning Commission be advised that the parking facilities in the Maplewood parks not be limited to concrete curbs around parking facilities. 17 Attachment 8 18 attachment 9 9) NEW BUSINESS A) elete Open-Space Site By Public Works From Comprehensive Plan In Favor of • y Site - ' _ to displayed a map of the site. 'The new City Hall i s nne d wes of y the P lic Works Building overlooking the pond, to the st and the Gateway Trail t the south,''. The Commis on recalled that a natural.ice i or hocke - rink wa s - s Alarmed for this sit t one time. Commissioner:Pil ich -MOVED that the k and Recreati n o C o m m i s s i o n recom - mends the four. acr i to ad j acent the N21 ewood Public Works B u i l d i n g be deleted from the lewood Co rehensive�Plan as an Open S ace Park Sit p e -_ for the new City Hall; NCOND y Commissioner Brenner; AYES: onissioners Chegwyn, Qualley, chneider, Zappa and Brenner; NAYES: Commissioner Christianson; Motion Pas d.. B) Nei hborhood Park Si In Area o Count • y Road B and German T he Maplewood Comp ensive Plan a oved by the City ouncil in 1982 indi- y cates asear �� search a for a Nei ghborhoo rk north of County Road B" and west of Ariel reet. Staff questioned w her there was n ' s need to include this ' search rea since the population did no eem to j ustify a ark. J y p Commissi er Christianson requested that the zonin a checked be ' fore making ' a dec ion to eliminate this search area for a Nei 9 hb od Park. Co issioner Christianson MOVED to continue ' e he dis scuss � on the next eting; SECOND by Commissioner Pi fetich; AYES: A TT, C) Cement Curbs Around Parkin 'Lots Staff pointed out a survey done b y Commun Development indicating what twenty-nine .other commun were doing as far as concrete curbing in parkin lots at arks. 9 p The Community Design Review Board and Planning Commission have r g n proposed an � amendment to the minimum parking requirement of the City's ordinance to include: "All parkin lots shall have continuous ' 9 s concrete curbing surround- ing the exterior perimeter of the lot and drive. Parks and arkin lots p g having .twelve • spaces or less exempt from this requirement unless required by the City Engineer for drainage control." The words "Parks and" we ee struck out by the Design Review Board. It is their feeling hat arks in g p the City should h y h ave to construct concrete curbing dust i as business s re- quired to do. Staff prepared a memo listing lternatives to cement ' 9 curbs for parks(t�mbers, fencing, berms, landscaping, walls, etc.). He stated that at this time the cost for asphalt is similar to concrete. Asphalt tends to be p r due to snow � plow damage. The amendment to the ordinance would affect - new con- struction only. Commissioner Zappa favored the long-range • g ge cost effectiv of using con- Crete for curbs. Commissioner Christianson MOVED to recommend to the Cit Counc 1 to rein - state the "Parks and" in.the proposed amendment to the City rdin n y ace struck out by the . - Community Des i n Review Board. and -leave the matter of drain age 1. contro and. aestheti to the City En ineer and Park Board SE O.VD b y Com �- missioner Schneider; AYES: Commissioners Che w n Qualley, Christian • 9 y � son, P�let�ch, Schneider and Brenner; NAPES: Commissioner Zappa; Motion Passed. 18 attachment 9 If construction has not begun within two ears of • . g y approval and review sha be repeated. 8. Site secu lighting shal 1 -be rovi ded a • p s hall be directed or shielded so .not -.to cause, an ndue glare onto - adja properties or roadways. .99 The landscape plan sha be r i sed for . � staff approval providing ..for. a. Evergreen shrubbe shall ro v i ded in the areas indicated on the b u i l d i n g elevation sheets. b. Sod s be provided in all rass g area north and northwest of the propose ui ldi ng, and also around the peri of the entire building, ' All er disturbed areas shall be sod or seed. B d Member Peterson seconded - __ Ayes a11. B. Parking Ordinance Amendment Secretary Ekstrand said that Gar Jackson f • Gary f rom Maplewood Mall is present at the meeting to listen to. discussion. regarding the p arking ordi - g p g and amendment. Board Member Juker said she t i s _ opposed to the proposed 9 foot wide stalls, The board discussed the number • e of parking spaces required for school auditoriums and suggested staff survey ther communities • y ties regarding their requirements, The board agreed that any parkin lot either i n a g � park or by a commercial building, should be required to h ' q have the continuous concrete curbing. They eliminated reducing the p arking s tal l ' g P g t 11 s i ie for employees to . 8 11 feet. They suggested adding to 'the manuf acturing and warehouse parking g u ' to include 1 space p e for 400 square feet of manufacturing use and l .space for each 1,000 square f g q eet.of-warehousing space or one space of each two empl oyees, whi chever. is greater. Also section i ( ) s hou l;d ;t be (h) Board Member Rossbach moved the board recom approval of the proposed amendment to the parking requirements as amended b the board as follows. 1. Section 36 -22 (a) (8) add after "One spac p ce for each two (Z) Employees " or 1 space for each 400 square feet of manufac ctur�ng use and 1 space for each 1000 square feet of warehousing space, whiche r " g P e n s greater. . 20 E l i m i n a t e from Section 36~22 " � 6 22 (b) Parking spaces des i gnated -for 'employees o onl may be reduced to minimum wi P gees h of 8 1 /2 feet. " 3. Eliminate f rom Sec — (d) tion 36 22 and. " 4. .Section , 36 -140 "(i )" should be changed t " " g o (h) . Board Member Peterson seconded Ayes. —Board Members Peterson, Rossbach, Deans Nays. —Board Member Juker 19 Attachment 10 reduced below the requirements of this paragraph. • • r - convenience- store—o Kestaurant • -! with the fna (b ) Ninety re i and twenty feet lon except mUlti dwellings,, All other s ' - o n s - than in .stri in lines x 1 si If d Dar-kim . -ap abuts a curb sidewalk . • tbe _Qf c All s aces shall be s r ' widths based on the ' Parking Angle Aisle Width 20 de r ee cep._, -wp -wav t r a f f r 1 60 _degree n . --- ee Con traf f i _45 degree 16 feet ne-wav traff is 11 a conti and rives -Park . P arking lots that are not used ' n • having twelve -- s , 12aces or less a re. -exempt fr_Qm tJa_is-_re_c[ujX,_ e All arkin lots sha ' maintained. Section 2. Section 36 --140 (g -j) of the CO, commercial office district, regulations are amended as follows (deletions are crossed out) • ' w . w — — • 17- - MP-A dI'W_= M M Cr -OLI-IML MONO Z�I-Mt up .4m a ' _ � � � r r. � r • r v WAIM • • �► - "AL garl= Y , Vio MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: MTC Bus Route Change DATE: August 19, 1985 Action by Council JEnd ©are a d...� ..�,�,......,._ Modif i e d.., -- Re j ecte Date The MTC has requested a route change as shown on the attached map. The intent is to give service to St. John's Hospital) and the new development along Beam Avenue. The change does present a concern for the future of Hazelwood Street. The present spring time load limit is 3 -ton, which would not allow' bus traffic. If the city counc approved the requested route change, serious consider- ation must be given to upgrading the street during the 1986 construction season. mb M E T' R 0 P '0 L. I T A N T R A N S I T COMM I.S SION 560-6th Avenue North, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55411-4398 612/349-7400 P-ROPOSED MTC. ROUTE 11B 7' 7 O 'T30NR22W Z 34 MAPLEWOOD. �' v ��'� : 47 -MALL, O _/3 w T29NR22W 0 r : _j S T. JOHNS' _P j H OSPITAL EAM AVE. BEAM 60 AVE& '13.K MA14 C T. SHAR-E CLINIC 22 NINI J AIrly 23 ...PAL sr. e er AV, DE AV. ii W� PD LA. Koh /man Lake 4 , HAZELRIDGE U KOHLMAN AVE. w Y KOHLMAN fil I 1_: F: 2 L] com a of w z z LROAD to I j ' 0 < --c I _j > :r D _j _j w _� cc in _j w (L >• z W W w w EDGEHILL RD. z . 3c W 0: < z at r r. _j DEMONT w' AV w U L NWROOK AVE. ,i cc BROOKS cr_ 61 w < Q I LMA-TAJ N T A V GERVAIS AV E. dE— GERVAIS G RANDVIE. SHE.RREN AVE. COPE Knild(leheod Lake OP LLA R K U) t.-: 9- E -- _j LARK AVE. F_ LARK 25 t-: [ 0TX > LAURIE R D. z 10 i'o z < RD 0 cr o x LP >_ >_ _j _j z AVE. U_ o JUNCTION AVE — � � � „� z A @ z w E::: U. oier cc A E. >- BU KE AV ELDRIDG -J AVE. 0 0 AN w a LMON T _j 64 > '.. Ir AVE. W cc N > SK VE. SK ILLMA AVE. HAR RIS w AVE D _ 01 R 'y A H R OS E O D' AVE. . . % I ST [AJN U r1% 111.1 2 27 FROST AVE 28 NEW MTC ROUTE PROPOSED ROUTE DISCONTINUED t sm to 0 0 0 .'Oor 010�3 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE City Manager City Engineer MSAS Five -Year Plan August 19, 1985 Action by Council: Endors-e Modif i ed.. ....,... Re eat Date Attached i s a suggested 5 —year plan for muni cipal state — street expenditures. This item is mainly to generate discussion about priorities. In any case, the council must approve a 5 —year plan. mb MUNICIPAL STATE -AID STREET SYSTEM 5 -Year Construction Program For .(State Aid Expenditures only) REVENUE Present State Aid Construction Balance June 34 19 Estimated Annual Construction Allotment $ 7 X 4 = $ 2- 07a a rj!IA stimated Total State Aid Allotment for Programming '� g EST114ATED EXPENDITUIRES Year of Estimated LxnendiCure Termini Project Description State Aid Expenditure On',�IOU'�'Mri. M�UJ1V �. From B&AM Vt, � l � C7►�D A4 � ��A Len�h Ond we D From To Lengthp.$"� q L AM ': U Ii S Z m From + TO t{ tl"A*m) $ .L& Length_ j I whu From.jjjrAt2 I To��ee. b y L t��ua! i�t�t3r� � $�D.o�o Len,th l�j,�',� lftj&15''"� On � To ° �� Lena th p, q� On From To � Length I MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Public Works Director SUBJECT: Diseased Trees DATE: August 19, 1985 Aotion by Council.: Endors a �.,. Madif i ed..... Rejecte Date The following cities were contacted concerning the extent of their diseased tree programs: No. St. Paul, Little Canada, Roseville, Oakdale and Woodbury. Each community has an ordinance similar to our own. The first four cities have fairly similar programs. Inspection is done in response to complaints and on a drive -by basis. A contractor is hired to remove any diseased trees at the property owner's sole expense. If the b i l l is not paid, the amount is assessed against the property. Woodbury has a similar program on paper but does not enforce the removal or levy assessments. Several of the surrounding cities utili a certified forester on a contract basis. I spoke with the individual for suggestions about a program for Maplewood. He indicated one day a week is usually sufficient to handle com- plaints and perform a reasonable amount of drive -by inspection. City staff would be utilized for receiving complaints, contractor direction, note f i cat o and assessments. The current rate for consultant is $10.00 /hr. This translates to approximately $2,000 per season for inspection. Additional cost to the city for tree removal on municipal property and right -of -way is undetermined. mb Action by Council E ndorSe& .,,..,,,.._.,....,., Vodifled MEMORANDUM Rejected_ , Date TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Petition for Improvement of Cope Avenue DATE: August 19, 1985 The attached petition is complete and represents 38% of the frontage along this proposed improvement. It is believed that the feasibility study may identify grade and vertical alignment problems with the section of Cope Avenue from White Bear Avenue to Craig Street where it connects with this proposed section. It is recommended that the council adopt the attached resolution odering the preparation of a feasibility study for or thi s ' improvement. It is also recom— mended that the council order the feasibility study to include a study of the .horizontal and vertical alignment of Cope Avenue from White Bear Avenue and Craig Street. mb Enc. RESOLUTION -- ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY WHEREAS, it is requested by petition of the required percentage of owners of property affected thereby to improve Cope Avenue from Craig Street to Ariel Street and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT.RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: That the proposed improvement be referred to the city engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. We the undersigned, do hereby petition the Council of the City of Maplewood to: Ir c r and that the said improvement be undertaken by the Village Cou ci7 in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429; and that the cost thereof be assessed against*benefitted property as provided by said Chapter 429. _ OWNER STREET ADDRESS LEGAL- DESCRIPTI FRONT- DATE A r% V; ' I certify that I have witnessed the above signatures, and the proposed improvements were discussed with the signers. IPM) TITI N SPONSOR ,�AT? naa. SOP r Lolls 7i a jo/t4o Imo / , l / Itk a s� � I certify that I have witnessed the above signatures, and the proposed improvements were discussed with the signers. IPM) TITI N SPONSOR ,�AT? � (, �; • a _ _ ,, ' feo' f07$ !too too I ' ° _----------= L---- .y__!�'..� _•.. ..�. ri ... r.. 1 i ' ,'�, - t t 1 l=• 1,� Ig !'�. ,) 7 1 .} 3 1 �i t�� i 1 r 1` f� X13 L,1;�! ► '�• . 1316 J_ J _j 3 T H . . �•- - 1 I{, 17 Ig 2 o Z t 2z 3 1 4 25 ' 7 2$ Z9 1jr 17 It ,�. z° Z' ZT- z3 Z+ ZS u Z7 4 t 0 . a •- �� c C 9 I (20 21) 22) ��- (Z C2� . . go Z / - ••,• s s.� : :� ... i t �pe 7/24/3 • - � Ole (A-191 or Ole 13 11 "i t a d 7 � b •''�► -3 7- 1 �'� i 3 ► t / i � 4 $ 6 � ,� ,•� 3 L 1 ,,� �. t .. lop i { i . - - . - A6 �✓ • r' ' va `. oil Z; ii Zl I alld f$ 1 � O 21 22 ZS 27 L� L� 30 tI; 1� i� Z• 2l 'Lt Za6 t7 2'' r . .. •. .• .• Z r I * . I 1 P _ & J •. _ C , Id 1 • • •• • •• • • �_ r ��V7r w �... - 147.395 'S'°!�'+' 15 4 b ° 13 3. 3 g: 3e /t i•jii ,- j ° io► 9 4.7 / 9 C ) , �`' "s• -�Yr. +ice �'' C 2Z ) o il - �' a yfW,X17 � �0 1 � : au► r' cis - � � w � � • � ,i.. 24 O3 28� J 3 'n C32) ( o 3 �-- a I • • r° ((3 7) qr (3) (17) W (.34 0 3`3 :4 3 A, C.v 4-- R K • - C) _ .� .� - - .J� - --I_ 0 8) -- (3 ST +' .1 4S 4v 971r AEI - _ _.. 'S - - -- 4 9) j Cam) C 38) �� 1 C s �) .'c L - N 0 LID '71Y Z -24- T-7 -7 va siF c o�0 1 _ 03 14 t CZI •, 5 qe (SG) 58) IQ 5 .4 LAU tii 3 a If 3 ____ __._T oil *.I t�.�. A•�4. 85 f - r 8 • {41) (47) �� 23) c cr r�(. tit 48 -G7 3Z) IT I J6 T _ 4 1 D!D (4Z) (4�) N El w o low -- - - -- --- - -- �3 � 1jl - -. ELI r `� Iii! %�-n I �