Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985 07-08 City Council PacketB) ROLL CALL AGENDA Maplewood City Council 7:00 P.M., Monday, July 8, 1985 Municipal Administration Building Meeting 85 -14 C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES 19 Minutes 85 -13, Meetinq June 24, 1985 5 r D)APPROVAL OF AGENDA E)CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine b the Cityy Council and will be enacted by one motion i n the form listedsted below. There will be no separate discussion on these items. If discussion is desired that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1.Accounts Payable 2.Budget Changes - Insurance 3.Time Extension - Crestview Forest 40 Time Extension - St. Paul Business Center East 50 Acceptance of Coin Club Donation F)_PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.7:00: I.D.R. - Western State Bank 20 7:00: Variance - Maplewood Manor 3.7:10: Prel i mi nary Plat - Bros hears Addition 49 7:20: Code Amendment - Parking (1st Reading) 50 7:30: Assessment Hearing - McClelland Watermain 6.7:40: Plan Amendment & Rezoning - Hwy. 61 Between Co, Rd. C& 36 - 70 7:50: Pl an Amendment & Rezoni ng - Castl e Ave. (Hi 11 crest) G) AWARD OF BIDS H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Ripley Ave. Water Main I) NEW BUSINESS 1. Plan Amendment: Harmony School 2. CDRB Appointment 30 Tax - Forfeited Properties 4. Code Amendment: M -1 & M -2 Districts (1st Reading) 50 Cable TV - Joint Powers Agreement 6, MHFA - Resolution I) NEW BUSINESS - Contd. 7e Countryview Golf Course - Agreement 80 Wesson Estate 9 Greenbrier Home, Inc. J) VISITOR PRESENTATIIONS K) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. a. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. L) ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS M) ADJOURNMENT fa MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, June 24, 1985 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 85 -13 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood,. Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present MaryLee Maida, Councilmember Present Charlotte Wasiluk, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of Meeting No. 85 -11 (June 7, 1985 ) Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 85 -11 June 7, 1985) as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk.Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian, and Maida. Councilmember Wasiluk abstained. 2. Minutes of Meeting No. 85 -12 (June 10, 1985) Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 85 -12 (June 10, 1985 ) Seconded by Councilmember Bastian.Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers and-- Wasiluk-. Councilmember Maida abstained. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Councilmember Bastian moved to approve the Agenda as amended 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Castle and Cope Frost Avenue City Water Problems Diseased Trees Brand Avenue Skillman Pending Hajicek Associates Seconded by Mayor Greavu.Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Anderson moved, seconded by Councilmember Maida, Ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda, Items E -1 through E -5 as recommended: 1. Accounts Payable Approved the Accounts, Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses Check Register dated 06-11-65 through 06 -13 -85 in the amount of $444,216.65 Part II - Payroll dated 06 -14 -85 in the gross amount of $123,281.63. 2. Cave's Lakewood Addition - Final Plat Approved the Cave's Lakewood Addition Final Plat of 28 single dwelling lots. 3. Tilsen's Maplewood Heights No. 12 - Final Plat Approved the Robert Tilsen's Maplewood Heights No. 12 final plat for eighteen single dwelling lots, subject to withholding the City's signatures until a tree replacement plan. that complies with the conditions of preliminary plat approval is approved by the Director of Community Development, 4. Granada Third Addition - Final Plat Approved the Granada Third Addition final plat of five lots of a 22 lot pre - liminary plat. 5. Hearing Date - IDB - Western State Bank - July 8 Resolution 85 - 6 - RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF A NOTICE OF THE HEARING WHEREAS, a) Chapter 474, Minnesota, Statutes, known as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (the "Act ") gives municipalities the power to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of the encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to prevent so far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; b) The City Council of the City of Maplewood (the "City") has received from WAV Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minne- sota (the "Company") a proposal that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter described, through the issuance of its industrial revenue bonds which may be in the form of a single debt instrument) (the "Bonds ") pursuant to the Act; c) Before proceeding with consideration of the request of the Company it is necessary for the City to hold a public hearing on the proposal pursuant to Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b, Minnesota Statutes; 2 - 6/24 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. A public hearing on the proposal of the Company will be held at the time and place set forth in the Notice of Hearing hereto attached. 2.. The general nature of the proposal and an estimate of the principal amount of bonds to be issued to finance the proposal are described in the attached form of Notice of Hearing. 3. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Energy and Economic De- velopment Authority, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together with proposed forms of all attachments and exhibits thereto, is on file in the office of the City Clerk, 4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the hearing to be given one publication in the official newspaper and a news- paper of general circulation available in the City, not less than 15 daysY nor more than 30 days prior to the date fixed for the substantiallyintheformoftheattachedNoticeofPublicHearing, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, will meet at the City Hall in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, at 7:00 p.m. on July 8, 1985, to consider the proposal of WAV, Inc., a Minne- sota corporation (the "Company "), that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter described by the issuance of industrial development revenue bonds. The proposed project shall consist of the construction and equipping of an approximately 24,700 square foot three -story commercial bank and office buildinglocatedat1740RiceStreetinMaplewood, Minnesota, and leased to Western State Bank of St. Paul. The maximum aggregate estimated principal amount of bonds or other obliga-tions to be issued to finance this project is $2 The project will be initially owned and operated by the Company. The bonds or other obligations if and when issued will not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance upon any property of the City except the project and such bonds or obligations will not be a charge against the City's general credit or taxing powers but will be payable from sums to be paid by the Com- pany pursuant to a revenue agreement. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Energy and Economic Develop- ment Authority, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, is available for public inspection begin- ning June 24, 1985, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, at the City Hall in Maplewood, Minnesota. At the time and place fixed for the Public Hearing, the City Council of the City of Maplewood will give all persons who appear at the hearing an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal. Dated this 24th day of June, 1985. 3 - 6/24 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL) By /s/ Lucille Aurelius City Clerk E A Presentation of 20 - Year Pins Mayor Greavu presented 20 -y pins to the follo emp who have serve the City of Maplewood faithfully and conscientiously for over 20 years Joseph Prettner 9 -4 -56 28 years,10 months Don Kortus 5-26-58 27 years,1 month Joseph Zappa 7 -1 -61 24 years Arline Hagen 3 -15 -62 23 years,3 months Lucille 10 -24 -62 22 years,8 months Norman Green 3 -1 -63 22 years,4 months Duane Williams 3 -1 -64 20 years,4 months Richard Dreger 9 -1 -64 20 years,10 months Laverne Nuteson 5-18-65 20 years,1 month F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M. - Plan Amendment and Conditional Use - City Hall a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding approval of a Land Use Plan amendment from P, Parks and playgrounds, to M, Municipal Facility and approval of a conditional use permit for a new city hall building. b. Mr. Herb Ketchum, Architectural Alliance Associates, presented the specifics of the new city hall. C. Commissioner Ralph Sletten presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: Commissioner Whitcomb moved the Planning Commission recommend the City Council adopt the resolution amending the comprehensive plan as follows: 1. Amending the park designation on the land use map to M, municipal facility 2. Deleting this site from the parks inventory and map on pages E -11 and E -12 of the plan. These amendments are on the basis that there is a greater public need for a city hall than a park for open space. The commission also recommends the Council adopt the resolution approving a conditional use permit for the new city hall, based on the findings listed in the resolution. Approval is subject to adherence to the site plan date - stamped May 14, 1985, unless a change is approved by the City's Community Design Review Board. Commissioner Sletten seconded Commissioner Whitcomb said he eliminated the statement from the motion that 4 - 6/24 would not require an annual review. The City should not have regulations waived when other projects in the City are required to have them Voting: Ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Cardinal, Ditch, Fischer, Larson, Sletten, Whitcomb" d. Board Member George Rossbach presented the following Community Design Review Board recommendation: Board Member Rossbach moved the board approve the plans date - stamped May 14, 1985, for the new Maplewood city hall, subject to: 1. Approval of a conditional use permit by the City Council. 2. Trash enclosures shall be provided to be compatible with building and meet code. 3. Any exterior building or roof -top equipment shall be decoratively screened and hidden from view. The screening material is subject to staff approval. 4. Grading, drainage, erosion control and utility plans shall be subject to the City Engineer's approval. 5. There shall be 111 parking apaces provided in addition to the 18 spaces in the "secure parking area" for the police department. 6. Parking areas shall be striped and all bituminous areas shall have con - tinuous concrete curbing and be maintained. 7. If construction has not begun within two years of approval, board review shall be repeated. 8. Site security lighting shall be provided and shall be directed or shielded so not to cause any undue glare onto adjacent properties or roadways. 9. The landscape plan shall be revised for staff approval providing for: a. Evergreen shrubbery shall be provided in the areas indicated on the building elevation sheets. b. Sod shall be provided in all grass areas north and northwest of the proposed building, and also around the perimeter of the entire building. All other disturbed areas shall be sod or seed. Board Member Peterson seconded Ayes - all." e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. f. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. h. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 5 - 6/24 V 85 - 6 - WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan from P, parks and playgrounds, to M, municipal facility for 1902 East County Road B. This site is also deleted from the parks inventory and map on pages E -11 and E-12. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 17, 1985, to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said plan amendment be approved. 2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on June 24, 1985. The Council considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described plan amendment be approved, on the basis that there is a greater public need for a city hall than a park for open space. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. i. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 85- 6- WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a conditional use permit to construct a new city hall at the following- described property: Unplatted lands. Except the N 333 feet and except the W 433 feet and except the S 183 feet of the W 633 feet; That part lying North- westerly of the abandoned Soo Line RR R /W, of the NW 1/4 (subject to easements) in Section 14, Township 29, Range 22. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on June 17, 1985. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said permit be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held,a public hearing on June 24, 1985. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All per- sons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. 6 - 6/24 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the fol- lowing findings -of -fact : 1. The use is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only-minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will-cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements atIpublic cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to adherence to the site plan, date- stamped May 14, 1985, unless a change is approved by the City's Community Design Review Board. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all C. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Insurance Contracts a. Finance Director Dan Faust presented the Staff report. b. Mr. Al Ciliske, Corporate Risk Managers, Inc., presented the bids. C. Councilmember Bastian moved to award the insurance contracts as follows: 7 - 6/24 1. Ekblad, Parde and Bewell League of*Minn. Cities - Package $ 155,462.00 Hartford Steam Boiler Boiler & Machiney 4,030 00 Auto- Owners - Bonds 1 Western World - Medical Malpractice 5,157.34 166,190.34 2. League of Minn. Cities Ins. Trust Workers' Compensation $ 106,850.00 3. W. A. Lang Co. Public Officials' Liability $ 5,544.00 278,584.00 Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. d. Councilmember Bastian moved to instruct the City Manager to investigate umbrella" coverage. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. City of Mound a. Mayor Greavu moved to table this item since no one from Mound, Minnesota, Minnesota, was present to discuss the request. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. b. Staff instructed to investigate the City's allocation for IRB and what is remaining. J. VISITOR PRESENTATION 1. George Rossbach a. Mr. Rossbach stated he felt the appointment of the Councilmember to fill the recent vacancy was handled inconsistently with the way appointments to commissions are handled and wishes the Council to adopt consistent procedures. b. Councilman Anderson suggested present commission or board members be asked to fill vacancies on other commissions and boards before advertising. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Haj icek Assessments and Taxes a. Mr. Gene Wilson, representing Mr. Robert Hajicek, requested Council send a letter to Ramsey County requesting them to delay collection of back taxes and 8 - 6/24 assessments. They hope to sell the land shortly and will be in a position4 to pay the delinquent charges. b. City Attorney, Patrick Kelly, explained the Council's position. c. Councilmember Anderson moved to request Ramsey County to delay collection of delinquent taxes and assessments for the property located on County Road D east of White Bear Avenue for an eight month period. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson and Wasiluk Nays - Councilmembers Bastian and Maida. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Castle and Cope Area a. Councilmember Anderson requested Staff investigate the storm water problem in the area of Castle and Cope. 2. Frost Avenue a. Councilmember Anderson questioned the progress of the Frost Avenue Improve- ment. b. Staff stated all the easements have not been obtained as yet. 3. City Water Problems a. Councilmember Anderson stated the St. Paul Water Department is placing re- quirements of separate services into each unit of a double or quad dwelling, etc. Can the City negotiate any of requirements imposed by the Water Depart- ment? b. Staff to investigate. 4. Diseased Trees a. Councilmember Bastian requested Staff compile figures of what the costs would be in identifying diseased trees. 5. Brand Avenue Ponding. C. Skillman Avenue Ponding a. Mayor Greavu requested Staff to investigate the ponding problems in the Brand Avenue area and in the Skillman Avenue Area. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS Discussed before Item K. M. ADJOURNMENT 8:51 P.M. 9 City Clerk 24 r Oft 1 I MANUAL Q). E CKS JUNE 30,1985 Page:1 1985 CITY aF MAPL EWOOD CMECK REGISTER C Cw D, T C _ __ __ .A l'Dl1 !!T uE y D o 158N8Cd/28/85 102,78 1. S Ps UTIt ?TIEc1SSACC612S /85 ___ ____ __.._._.1132.1$•.__ _. - _ ._ --S. p. _ ...._ -___.. __ __ _TI L I T Z S 16!31 69 06/2c/85 3+84olD MINN STATE TREAS L'CENSE PEL 161M13 C6/28/85 3 MAPLE LEAF UWPIRES .- 3 9705.10 # 151M69 i61 X69 6 l2j8 /85 _ __- -- -_ -- 6/2 / f 5 7401.2J _.._ ._N STATE TREAS -- - - - - --LICENSE PEL 161M69 x.6/28/85 54,: Q 279,'13 MTNNI STAT:: MINN STtT= TREAS TREAS LIC =!BSc FEL 161P69 C6 /2P /P ._ .. _ _- -43Ci.CD _MINN STATE TREAS LICENSE I,ZC _NSE FEL FEL 161 P5!-t; /26/FS 4 ,c4 POSTMASTER oCSTAGE 4C.24 161 F n 9 161 L 9P, C6 /28185 9.84 RA IIS =Y CHTT TREAS CCNTR ACT FYI! 161 9 6/28/85 4 b / 2E / f S - - ._. _ 1.75 bG. S6 R,4 MS= T CNTr TREAS C3N TRACT FY+ R4MSEY CCTY TRESS -- __ - -LCNTRACT FYM76 f :tom: f 161 S 9 L6 /28/ _ 5 83,42 SATELITTE CME TGUETE3.42 161 T9'-x'6/28/85 IV70 TJIN CITY GLASS SUPFL ES 162E 64 26/8 - - _ - _ .____ _1. *,^C ^.0 - -z BENEM.t14 ZS - -_DEN TaL CL:.M'S 162 M 6y 162P69 Cb 12 8 5 4.6/2)3/85 89184.38 M-1NN TT RTRr*AS CcLTC -N SE31E.?0 .r:,N STATE TRE AS LICEN JL89562.38 V I LL t E 1985 CITY uF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK N ;.DESCRIPTION I 162T R2 0b/2 ! 5______64.;0 - ------- . -__ --TRAYE LE RS _I NS CD _ -- -- - -___ -_1KSURAhC s 64,'0 + k ` I a 163M69 0 6/2?/ 8 5 5.344.88 MI lkN STAT= TREAS LICENSE PEL n F 163!x!69 b /2 -EIE __..___328.10_ --- __.- .-- - - -__-1!TNN STAT: - .TREAS - _ - - - -_. _LZCE'VSE PAL t F 5.672. ?8 r; f j 1o3N76 L6 1281E5 b,934.1 7 MN ST PQEAS PERA PIRA PBL 163 !76 6/M/b 9,263.5.1x_St TREAS FERA .___ - -- _. -__PERA PBL 163 76 6 /26/85 9,263.51 PNI ST TREA. PERA c =R A PBL 163P7 6/2 9,263.51 PON ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL i 16 s ? 9 7.. 6 R r , 164C4..06/28/85 1 a2. SC CLERK OF COURT CNTY FILING FEE ii 102.50 + t 1 E4 M2.6 /2 , e1.E5 -'1 0203 • -0 _f' TRC BAST= C OTt'?L - -- -SAC PSL 1b4!!Zf''b/28/85 102.'?C #METRO BAST_SACSAC PEL 16 4M69 Z6 /t2 /85_ _4,872.75 - -_ - . _Mj NN STAT= TREAS __ ___...LICE FEL 164M69 06/2-' E5 111 •0 M'r%Pl STAT= TREAS LICENSE PE i 4,9F3.?5 f 164 P 6:'tb /2 85 _ _. _..._2105 0C f:fl ST'+!. STEk. __ _._ - -. - - -_ -._. _ .POSTAGE f 164 'D1 ;6 /28 /85 5 .0 t'RAMS - 7Y COURT AMB FILLS 3 1b5Nb9 6 /2d /A5 4,384,59 TNN STATE TREAS LICENSE 1 "69 6/2818:26.30 MIN4 STAT = TR =AS LIC NSE FEL 165 M69 06/28/85 PWI STATE. TREAS __LICENSE 165M69 ro /2E/%i5 1 MINN STATr TRL0S LICcNSE FEL 165!wtS 6 /28 5 423." 0 MINN STATE TREAS LICENSE pig 1985 CITY OF MAFLEUOOD CHECK RFG'STER CHECK TEM DZjCRIPTZD ?d 1 b 8 A r :b / 2. / 8 5 - -_._ _. __.3 5 7...1- S df' SC M _ _ .___UNI CN CUES PBL 168A : °6/2 /25 5.A FS. CME UNICN Dlsr2 PEL E 362.89 f *sf: f 16EC35 ZTY LINTY EMP .ACR ._UN - . ____ .iCREDITUNICN 17220.5^ 10FT15 76/2i?/25 2.539.34 ICMA QrF CCMF FEL l6 DE F C O M;- F Q L 3 003 .2 9 16EK2)6 /22 /f 5 145olO KANE ROSEMARY EIR ODUCT 14 5, C' 16M52 6/2 15.277.31 MN FED SAVI AGS FWT PBL 15,277..1 f.•sf 1a86'1 0 / __________.__._-31 u. 0 -- _...__P. N M UTUAL ..L IF = _._._— _._._— ____._._.NSLRANCE P8L 310.x' 106 65 C 6/28 F 5 89413.97 M% ST 6%4'OM4 REVENUE S6T PBL x,413.9.1• -: -_ ____ 168 M6)r 6/26 f8 5 25.54 PN ST RET TRE DEF COMP FEL 16bMo v6 / /FS 1 894 M *l ST RET: PEMENT D COPO P8L 166li69 06/28/ 25 4 9437.:0 lM:NN STATE TR: sS LICE'NSL POL 166M69 L6/2.3185 - - -3 M: NIV STAT_ TREAS LICENSE FEL 4 , 829, -1 0 : 16oMIl L6 /2t /.E:.._ - - --4 476.2 ST TREAS c/j _ _ __ _.SIS PEL 168F7L G6 /2,8 /f 49476.26 Pty ST TRE+S S/S S/S PAL 8 9952.52 10 M75 0bl2 Elf S ___._.._._..._..-71 b. 76 _ ...FN T:: LMSTCRS - -- - - _UhION OLr" DEL 716.76 • it 19F 5 CITY JF MAFLE-61".,OD CHECK REGISTER CHECK ITEiv D."A-'%'zrCR-lPTlC% 16 b f,N.S.P.UTILITIE 2 $3e53 OILITIES. 16 8 to?,.l a612E/ E'K 2*40 NeSoPo UTI L'. TIE. 1%r 6 / 28 / 8 5..--4 N*S*UTI L T I ESW 168NEU C6/26/85 2e 40 No C P.UTIL17IES 2 F56lz - 00 2e40 p 0 UTILITIESS No Sr p *UT I L I T I S 2 0- f ? 5 2*40 N 0 Sop .0 U.T I Ll. T I E S a 6/28/8 5 1 MW 2 NeSoP•UTILITIES w# a 4 go u T I L T IE S 169'k 12F / 8 5 O133o6 No SOP le UTILITIES I tF e P166 102 e'76w sk sr-UT I L I T I It-' *S 16 b %I C-0 / 2 $ / $5 32 ik" 0 So?UTILITIES 16 IR b /2 /85 102*78 NSF UTI LITlir.'%c 168%,6/28 f R5 5eQ8 UTILITIES 166 6 /293 / B 5 76s 8 5 SP UTILI UTILITIES1b1,14 6/28tF5 6*04 4*25 lysp NSF16F 16 8 % 8J 26/2dw/85 345 *26 NSP UTILITIES I L6/28/85 55e17 NSF UTILITIES 16 o/2s-' /85 344 .1 8 SP UTILITIES 1 6/28/ e 5 181 UTILIIIE'hc. UTILITIES 1 - J, C 6 / 2 P- / E 5 5 153*70 4,e-74 NSP ASP UTILITIES 168 k 91 166 N P- -,.i C 6/2-d / E t.; %#t.; %#246*27 I- pN; Z)UTILITI; S 168` 8'::76 f 2P / 8 5 221934 SF UTILITIES S-UTUTILITIETIIC /2 /E5 137o72 16 R- t., 8 J-r 6/2,-9/8 5 81 e3l. X4.1 tsp.. N SP ESUTILITI 166 k 16 6 1 E F'6 f 28 / 85 P3 el f N S.) p U T I L I 16 8 ?2 167.6b N SP UT I L All T 2 169045 6 28 / 5 1-030 DISPA TCH PACER U9M69 6 12;11 E 5 79637*05 MINN STATE TREAS LICENSE PEL LICE114SE FEL lt9*69 06/28/85 515 * C '0 M: AN STATE TREAS 2 170193 " 46/ 8 co 31 , 2*"9 Sr.HNTTTER FIREWORKS JULY 4TH 312*79 l7amo9 3 STAT:-' TRE"'iS SEUCE%z FBL 3 • 1985 CITY 3F MAFLEWCCD CHECK REGISTER 7 CHECK v HD Co _._.._____ ._._ _ - -._1 TE r I3ESCR IF T I C I 170M71 6l2F 18y Wu ST TREAS .4UATAX - --SURTAX PRL 110N71 L 6/28/85 16.21-MN ST TREAS SURTAX SURTAX PEL c 794.68 v 71 C 29 CONTRACT FYI 15 : , ? 0 t 1712 6/2 1 Vile x{KSLL!Y J94N CCNTRA.CT FYM 171475 L6 /2E /E5 IV n ALSTAG RICHARD CCNTRACT PYM 15 '1() 171 C44.E612 CL'RK DF COURT _-LICENSE Fe1 171 H"7,6128/E5 2.31 HAGEN AQLINE PETTY CASt- 171H1t ra12;£ /F5 _.1..31 -H ^CEN ARL1 _._ _ - - - - -- - .PETTY CAS} 1713 -1 6.R5 HAGEN A:RL?NE PETTY CASf- 1 T1 mir 6 /2 4.34 HAGEN ARL;NE PETTY CA SF 1T1 141"b/28/b5 - - - --3..49_ ____AGEN?L:lE _____ - __ - -__ -__PETTY CASE 171141E b /2F /A`5.25 MAGEN ARIINE PETTY CA Sf 171141::6/2 ? /E5 2.f 4AGEN ARL:NE PETTY CAS1- 171 H1C 26/28/85 6,*EZ__ -- --- .ICA GEN ARLIN£PET TY CA sr 1T1 H1 6/2E/ E5 7951 4AGE4 A;RLINE PETTY CA cF 171 NIL 6/2 /85 3.50 HAGEN ARL INE AET I CA SO- Ill til C6 /28/8:4.25_._..NACEN ARLIN£ -_ --PETTY CASF 47.68 Ill H7J Z6 /2E /ES 2402 H0RS4 EEL L JUCITH ILEAGE 2 9.12 tf #t :s 1711,69 L6 /2E /E5 4 6 MINN STATE TREAS LICENSE FEL 1T1r69 6 /2E /E:159.70 MZNN STAT: TREAS LICENSE' pEl 4 , 6 : 171 F5.612E/E5 763.10 FO,<.TMaSTFR FCSTAGE 763.10 LcI# 41rl. P• 1955 CITY OF MAFLEid^OD CHECK REGISTER CHECK N C:DA TL __...___ __AM C;J NT._r _.Y. ND Q? ._ITEM DE GIFT..0 112E64 G6/28/d5 1 ,OD ^.'_'!)EMP BENEF T CLAIMS CiENTA! CLAIMS iii * i 172M69 u6 /28/E5 r.6 5 ,PIAN STATZ' TREAS L.iCENSE PEL 1721069 2k'/Pc 383930 M INN STATE TREAS.LICENSL FEL 5,p 5 54 .2 5 i *title: 115223 6%28/$:49.?9 MC DONALD RESTR PROGRAMS A9.?9 i 175747 36 /ME E 5 1 NOFGRiFE MAR YAiiN ton r i 17568r X6/28/85 4r.DAVIS VIPCTNIA REFUttD D i i tt i tk ,t 1151069 o/29/Q5 69129.101 r'N STAT_ TRrA %URER LICENSE FEL 1751069 1 -$785 285..:3 PTNN STATE TRZASUR=R FBL 115M69 401 .. D _ .____.ri h STATE TR-110ENSE FEL lttiit 6.815. R1 1?5Rii,C6I28/85 2 RAMS =Y CCURT AMB RuVS 176C4 6/26 85 1 2C.5C CLERK nF COURT FIL IN6 FEE 127.50 ittiitt 176 L6/22/2 5._..____._19.47 __ -.__-COLLINS CL NNETn Y_ ._ -_ -._.SUPPLZ_S 19.47 ittitt #i 176G22 C6/28/F5 39 42,41 AMr TIME FROG SLPPLIEc 116 C ?L b!2 -- _4b. G Garr TIME - - _._ ...._...PRO SUFF LIE S 11bG22 C6 /2A/85 2 1588.130 GAME TIME P SUPPLIC c 115522 i'6 /2o /bS GAME TIME PROC SUPFLIEc 19F 5 CITY OF MAPLE `COu C REGISTER CHECK AC•D «T. .__ __._PW AT ITEM LESCRIFTION 9,9363.41 176 M 6 9 STAT.PEL 176M69 6128/E5 41 5,* D MINN STAT_ TREAS LICENSc R8L W 34.3 P 1 77:32 _.._9612 , bl8 91 •~=._ ___ --_MI _Z.00 PKfl6RAr.s 91.; E 117223 «C'6/28/85 2'8 .62 MC 091ALE RESTR PROGRAPS 28.62 117 3 r6 /28 /85 40..0 E7ZJAK DEi-ORES REFUND 177 W4 P 798 'M A PL,E WO JD A TM ASSOC _... _ ._._LIMP I R ES 177F4 ••i6 /2F /S5 432.; 0 MAPL =iCOC ATH ASSOC U! P:crS 1718'•6/2?I85 192.707 MAPL = W00D ATM ASSOC LMPI ;.Ec 177 M69 4612F /45 5, 661 .50 M.NN STAT. TEc =A S L ICrNSE PEL 1lTMy 6/2,/85 33C.30 IV NN STAT= TREAS L"Ll NSE PEL 117P76 6/2 '8/85 6.917.57 PN ST TREAS PrKA LIC '8L 117 ?76 6/13/85 9.197.35 MN ST TREAS PERA LIC P8L 16 114.9 2 * _. _ 1/8371 "U6128/85 67.53 NY IPA N FREIGHT FREIGHT FIRcb+ _'R} 67.53 17 5741 06 2.IA5 2 * 962.'3 P RO SC CONTRACTING C CNTRACT PYM 2 , ^8 118M69 I6/28/P.5 F3, 941 •5 5 MINN STATE TREAS LICENSE PEL PAOles 4 r 19E5 CITY OF MAPL,EW31D CHECK REGISTER CHECK P.%.CATE DESCFI 118NE9 U6/2e/85 2069:0 MINN STAT=TRc A S LICENSE. fEL 9 ,1.4 T_&5 5_*.- 1 TyNE9 5 F MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE PEL 1191 C6/28/85 fTNN STAT_TR-'ASUPrR LIC PEL 179115y X6/28/ _____.__..___.._.-43 . -._._ . - --MINN STATE TREASURER- -___ --LICENSE f8L 6.513.30 17 9 * F 6 128 /E5 7R611 NSP UT; L!TIE E. 119 N °b/ 28 /R5 . __ - _.__A 51 , 95 NS P LTl L TI 179[8''X6/28/85 76.44 NS'UTI Li TIE E 306.50 rs *tf f 179076 L6 /28/85 52E ."0 _IJU ?DALE I4-S __ _ _._...INSURANCE 52n s C 31 161 *7 FUND 01 TOTAL GE. N E_ R AL 344.13 fU1-$D C?TOTAL HYDRANT Cl-AaGr_ 99363.41 FUND 11 TCTAL FARK 0EVELCvEEN1 2 968. ^3 FUNn 39 TOTAL 84 - 4 MCCLELLAC 9• 'R4 FUND 56 TOTAL 85 - RIFLEY AVE FUND 6f TOTAL _ _ ,_ .__ _8 5- C7 C cSTV I E 6A *64 FUND 36 TCTAL 83 -4 pCKA 3EHT R; 1 9401 .62 FUND 9C TOTAL SANITARY SEW a f 23 971 9.53 ...__..____FU 110 92 TOTAL _ _.... _._PAYROLL BEhr-FIT 2,'J0 . 1 FUND 94 TOTAL.DEN TAL '.z ELf - IV,SL 10,FU%D 9f TOTAL VE 8 1EGLIF 221141.14 TCTAL 1 ECESSARY EXPENDLTURE . _SINCE LAST ._COU -CIL._ MEETING _ t ACC OUNT ,PAYABLE - JTUN -E_ _8_ ,_1 8 ._ PAGE l t 19F5 CITV OF MAFLE CCD CHECK REi,IST7R CHECK N'DATE AWOUJ\T VENDCZ iTt M DESCFIFT: C' 188U5C L6/2 118.33 UNIFOPMS UNLIMITED UNIFCRMlS 118.33 188UR5 06/27/85 1 T.rL UNIVERSAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES L 17.70 f 1892'C4 b/27/85 18.,E H;ALTN RESIURCES CONTRACT FYM 169CC4 6/27/85 12.00 HEALTH RESOURCES - - -CONTRACT FYM 1690L•X6/27/85 2?s_ALT44 RESOURCES CCINTRACT FYM 1R9C C4 n-0/27/85-54.00 HEALTH RES1- LRCES CON TRACT FYK 109, -4 6/27/F5 36.iC F±EALTN RESOURC CCNTR ACT FYM t 169 ^C4 X6/27/85 616.L HrALT4 RESCLRCES CIN7r"ACT FYP 169 ^C4 6/2?/85 330.317 HEILTH REC%d c C:'TRACT FYM 1890 '4 6/27/85 13 2 *0 tHEALT44 RESOURC_g CON TR «CT f Y Im 1,092C4 Cb /27/85 T8,''FEALTY+ RESCURCwS CCyT ACT rM 1,284.0 189014 C6 /2.7/8 17.1 ^BAUSCH KATHLEEN REFLNO IF9''51 6127/85 9.''^LLD CARS PRICE.ICS GU Jr rMp- B =RShIF t 9 ; 1e9CbC 216/2 V Gip _ 8IE SLDPLTL` lit 9062 1.6/26/85 5.40 i hXEUM SALES CO SUPPLIES 5.4C 1t9C'91 0 1271F5 2 P482.33 SEVT3 ": PR INTI+:,j _.PRI NT1NG 2.482..30 * 1 o90G 7 L6 /27 / E 5 12.'30 A -1 RUST NESS PAC* HiNE SUPF L IES 1t9797 6/27/85 129 ,0 - -- - -A - 1 PUSIN =SS M""%CM .SUPPLIES 169097 d/27/85 12.:0 A -1 BUl-ZIKr -ss WICHiriE SUPPLIES 1 091 1 4 6 121 /85 01 2700 PA AN RE STR St, +P s 15E5 CITY OF MAFLEU70D CHECK REGISTER CHECK AC.C"Tt_AMOUNT YE NDCR ._ITEM CESCRIPTIO 169125 X6/27/85 175 ^^CFPpP E RISK MANGOCATA N PA TCTC FYr ttttf+ f 169176 j 6/27/8 5 1G • ^^F: P_ MARSHALS mm8E -IF 1 -92..c X6/27/85 17.. 06 JOHNSON FARIAhNE R=FUN0 1ts9221 C60*27/F5 235.:0 CA.NTEPRUPY DOS *IS 47 TICKET% 2 35 1 Z92 71 6 /27 /8 5 4.66 Nf)RTHWE ST FABRICS SUPFL TES 4.56 1t,92 r7 6/27&/85 2.8 ST REG- CORD SUPPLIES 2 g884.D 11931 6/27/85 150.;0 K NNA .IOF *1 J CCNTK:CT FYM 15 .710 169 32 7 16/27/05 127950 PN S"FETY COUNCIL TKA 1N'rNC 127.50 t 1:!9431 6/27/85 20.''rAFUSKA P4RK UNIFORM,. 2C 10 482.47 DJNS BODY SMOO UNI FC:M_ 482.47 16944u J6/27/85 20."C F!SCucR I(ARA TrSE TRAV:L TR:+j.N' "G s*t• c 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWCOD CH_CK R£vIST 'R h^.DATE AMOUN VEND C?ITE N OSrA F TI I a 18944E 1 - L 7 /f 5 7 W C J V N r a. 1 _.. _. _,_._ _.__ _._ _— •-MILE A V f *r r 189452 06/27 U. =RD PEFLNC 1b9464 6/27 /8 5 459668924 FR OOKOkLE FORE CONTRACT FV 45 s x.24 tfrrr 189551 6/27/85 22.x^FALK!:NnL JON "vl R TF UND 169567 6 /27/f5 I '0 J3 FOLK El AND JULY 4T 1195 7 1.6 /27 / F 5 16.2 5 MPLS STAR a TRIBUNE RAP:.RS 16.?5 1a965 7 o /27 /F5 2•ST P CI SP TC'M_FUBLISH fC 27.3 0 1b9721 6/27•/85 20 . ^^EIOEV MARY TRAtiEL TQtIf17 G 20 _* 169125 U6/27/85 1 6.929.n?7 ARCHITECTURAL ALL CON TRACT FYM 16 9929."7 1F9736 .6/27/85 _ 2•"'t` PTN4 _PLANNING ASSCD - -- R St- IF 20).'Q r *tttr 1,5 982 ,;6 7 /F: 90)0 FARNHA4 BONNIE FEFUND ESlo98296/27/L: 198.27 GEN I ND SUOPLY SUPPL f Q t 1985 CITY DF MAPLEWC30 CMcCK REG'ST'R CHErK A ^.DATE A MDU!VT . vENDC'DESCRIP110 198.27 189866 66/27 MCNULTY JOHN J RrPAI? MAINT VE> 1It 98 7 0 /27 /85 5C.in BANTCK JOo4N SoLPFLIES 5^. ^C 18 6/ 27/F5 17.53 n± CC=s OIL CO - -Ft,EI Cil 17.53 1;19: 2 16/26/R5 67.47 ACPO•M SLpPLI EE 1 F9 Z b / 2t /F5 67.46 ACPO•MTN -... _ _ - - -_ ._ - -- -_ --SUPPLIE 134.9.3 1f(9A5 b /26/Ft 1 4fSC SUPPLIES %EH 16 9 ot ? 5 316!26/85 1t'$,R6 A-JAX nflM' P BRAKE SUPFLIES %EH 108. E6 1rs9A5 S J6 /ZT /8 `iE RI OATA --.. _—CONTPkCT F 1L91 55 o /27 /FS 2.345• ?U AV=R: -DATA SISIEM CCNTRACT FYM X89455 6/26/85 165 e'AME'RI• -DATA SYSTEM LEASE PURCHASE 1k9A75 6/27!85 21999 AT S T TELc:PH0NE 1c9 75 6127/E5 --6. ^2 AT i T TELEFNCNE 169 175 2 - -._ --AT b T - - _ - - -- -TELL - P+ E 1c9!75 L6 /27 /FS 2.52 AT 9 T TELEPHONE 1(-9175 J6 /27 1 5 3.01 AT 9 T TELEPt-Ch F 1 ,c 9, 75 6 /27 /P 9. ^AT 9 T -TELcP#QONc 109A75 j6 /2T /85 6.r2 AT s T T;LEPHOKE 1r94 v61271F5 14051 AT 9 T TUEN -WiE I'd 7 /E 5 133. 9 AT b T TELEFhCA 0. 1 19t.75 X6/27/8 s 77 AT T TELEPI.ONE 1c91".. 7S 6/27/95 301A T TEL EPHGAE 109475 6/27/8 4 % 3 - . _AT T - _ - -_ -- - - __-- _._TE E IY9A?5 C. 6127/85 2f'.28 AT g T TELEFHCAE i Pig . 1985 CITY OF PIAPL_ 611D CHECK REGIST CHECK Nl.C«,TE AMOU VENDG'TEM CESCRIPTiO` 1t9A75 6/27/fi.127.2x•AT b T PRINTER 189A75 6127/85 33.310 AT i T TELEPt O14E 1x9:,75 j o/27/85 25.64 AT 8 T PRINTER 169A75 6/21/E 23.22 AT i T TELEPHONE 169A75 6/27/ 85 3.''1 AT i T T LEPNDlVE 10 9 A 7 5 6/27185 1 e_.'` 6 AT 8 T - - -- -- _ _.__- _.--- ---- -- -TELEPHONE 109A 75 ta 6/27 /85 289C 1 AT i T TELEPHONE 1c9A75 LO /2.7/E5 AT 9 T TELEPI -ONE 169A 75 6/27 /A `.34.41 AT 8 TELEFHOA E 1t9A75 i.6/2 #7/85 6.x.AT i T TELEPHONE 109A7.t 3.r 1 AT 9 T TEL EPHON E Io9A75 Ljb /17 /e c 3.:'1 AT L T TELEPHON7 1891 75 06127/8 3.r1 AT Z T TELEFHCAE 169 A 7 5 6 /27/ E :I on 5n •.AT t T FPI lk T =R 109 75 0 /27 /8 `.3.x'1 AT i TELEPHONE 1x9 A75 C 6 12 71 8 5 7.69 AT b T TELEPiHON E 1 9492 .53 169915 j 16.47 _BATTERY TIRE WHSE SUPPLIES bEl- 16.47 1t9E4 5 6 /26 / 85 - _14.1 8 -BOIRD OF 4ATER CgmM UTILITIES 189845 6/26/ES 11.06 BARD OF WATER CCNIt LTILITIE.%. 189E45 b /2o /P5 31.63 LC "RO DP WATER COMM CCNTPDCT FYM 1 a 9 Q 4 5 _i 6 / ' c o / A 5 _ _ _._. _6.31 , 4 e 0 AR 0 F ) F _ WATER _C O P M -- - ----__C JN T R A C T F Y P 696e25 t 189e65 d/2.7/85 0010 3 .2 R_S SL ?PLIES 169C33 6/26/p5 33914 CAPITOL SUPPLY S LP P L IES 33.14 16905 5 j6/26/P5 216.42 CO DUPLIL CATINO CUPLICAT INN CCS' 206.42 + 189C56 6/27/85 397.46 CCLLINS ELECTRIC SUPPLIES IbYC56 6/27/85 82.63 COLLINS ELECTRj.C-_-_.._____SUPPLIES 169C56 6/26/8 49058 COLLINS ELECTRIC CCNTRACT FYM 529.67 ld9c5 , (j6/26/ 8 -- 5 - --- _. -- - - -_5.50 - -CCoY E ©UIt _INC _SUPPLIES 1e9C56 6/26/85 21.49 CCFY E'GUPMENT INC SUPPLIES R 1985 CTTY OF MAFLEIoM CHECK REGISTER CHECK %0e D:.Tc AMOUNT Y = N00*ITEM DESCFIFTTOfz 189 t 5g r6/26/t5 130 COFY E 8UI DMENT INC SUPPLIES 1a9C5 6 u6/26 /85 100 5 COPY E©UIFPENT I1iC SPFLiES f f.1e9E91 036/26/65 225.'0 EVANS BARRY V_HICLE ALLC6ANC 225.CD t : :tom 1u9G?r?6 /26/8 34 G Eft EPA L REPAIR C^N7F%ACT FYM 345.'0 169641'6/26 18;28994 GOODIN CC S UP P L IES 28.44 * rft 189h19 16/26/85 62.45 HANDY 14ITC4 MELDING SUPPLIES 169H 6126185 26.50 HAAMY HITCH W= LDING SLPPL1ES. k19H1 S 6 /26 /P5 259 .70 PAI DY HITCH WELO?Nd _.._.- _SUPPLIES 113,95 t 1b9'Z6 6/26 85 42.49 1NNERL.INE C"NTPACT FYM 42.49 169:3 X6/26/85 26.60 1NOEP= N0E`,T0622 CONTRACT FYM 1zs91 3%6 /2E /E 2600 INCE' ;NOF%T #622 CCNTRAC7 FYM 1?913 16/26/85 __. _. _26.3 ._..__ _I DE T# 6 CCNTRACT FYM 189I3 6126185 26.30 CEP= kD!7NT #622 CCNTRACT FYM 109 V3 j6/26/b5 ..---26.33 1N CEP _N DEN T #622 CONTACT P1rr 189:s cILf18 ; -------26.3C_ _tACE PEN Dr%T #622 C 'CON 7RaCT FYR 1y9T3''26 26.30 INC= Z'CCNTRACT FYM 109?3.b /26lP5 26 I"CEP=ND tiT #622 C"N7PAC7 FYM 169.3 i0 /26/85 2b,3C INC — AENDF. T #622 -_CONTRACT FYM 169 :3 16/26185 26.30 I'4CLrENDE „T #622 C CON IRAC7 FYM 1b913 Cb /26 /AS -__ -2+5.3Q INCE'PENDENT #622 CCNTRA%T FYM 169;3 '6 /26/AS 26.10 ThCEPrNDL%T #622 _ -CONTRACT FYN 169:30 6/26/85 26.3u INCrpE:NDEP,IT #622 CCNTRACT FYM 1t9I?6126/F5 26.30 IhCEr =NOE%T #622'CCNTFAC'FYP 1 i 9 13;0 /26115 2603 I ;I CEP E NDE "IT #622.CCNTR ACT RYM 189 TSL x`6 126 /85 26 *30 I NCEPE NDE *T #622 CONTRACT FYM 1b9:36 6 /26/85 26.30 INICEP_NDENT #622 CCNTRACT FYM 169130-b/261E5 - ---2693C IKDE NDr%:T #622 CCNTRACT FYr 473.70 169032 6126 18 5 _ ._.__923.38 J.L. SHIELr CO CONTRACT FYI! f 19E 5 CITY 3F MA;:LEUOOD CHECK REGISTER h ^.CTc AMOUNT V NDOR T TE N DE S C F I F T I C t lb9J32 L6/26185 3 ,399.43 J.L. SHI ELY CC CONTRACT fYM 1393 16/26/8 c 5 35.1 J L S -IEL Cc CONTRACT IFYM 1 9J.52 6/26185 167.49 J.L. SHTELr CC CCNTRACT FYM 9,840.98 ! 1F9J510 06/26/85 27F.25 J THOMAS ATHLECTTCS SUPPL? =S FRCf 21 t 1F9KII f6/46/F5 28.92 KftrART SUPFLIES 28.92 169K5 5 6/26/85 86.14 - -f(NCX LUMBER SUPFLIES Y6.1 4 1r9K56 6/26/85 2...7T --kN;CWLA ND .SUPFLIES 169 K56 F. 1 K N CW L ANDc t cS'PL .E 1 I 's 1b9LIf 16906 5 1 9173.50 LAIS PANK!GAN KlY CCNTR CT FYM 6 /26/29692,2B LAIS BANN';A1i KLY CCNTPACT FVP 18906 67.50 LAIS BANN'";%A0J KLY CCNTR4CT fTM 3033.2E 1`9L31 6 /26 /Et 65."D LEAGUE OF MN C1TI .-TRAVEL TRAJ%T 65.`? i9L32 6/26/ES 955,'v LAW CVOQLEMLT EQUP SUPFLIES 189L32 Cb /2o /R5 z2. C LAW = NFOPCrME''NT EQUP SUPPLIES 169L34 y6/26/85 87.75 LEAGUE. OF MN +-UMA N MEM8_RSt4IF 8T • 7 5 1 e.9 L 36 2 6 / 8 5 2901 E! S A U T t SUPP L Y S UP P L I E S 1a9L 36 J6/26 5.94 LEES A UT C SUPPLY SUPFLIES 169L3E 20.51 - -LEES AUTO SUPPLY - -SLPPL 5 5.5 5 * 1090n, 70 L 6 /2018 5 1 LO CI S CCNTR ACT FYY 19E 5 CITY OF MAPLEwC .0D CHECK REGISTER f CHECK NC.CATE AM3UNT VE4DCR TTCr DESCRIFT70N 169L7C 6/26/85 931.93 LOGIS CONTRACT FYM 2.904,29 1 t 9 L 7 5 6! 2 618 5 1 _ 3 L C Nok LK F S P C T R A C T UR S UP P L I E c 109L7:)U6/26/85 36.94 LONG LK F•IP C Tt%ACTjR SUPPL LS 169L75 16/26/85 53,Q8 LM LK FORC IS ACTOR SUPPLIES _ 1a9L75 b /26/254.38 LCNG LK FCRC TRACTOR SUPPL LL$ 363 1p9Rr5 b /z6 /c 159086 F0 SUPPLY SUPPLIES 199. a6 1 9! 11 0126/85 124.31 PAL' QUE:EA E6U'PWEhT'SUPPLIES 1 F91 1r 6/26/ P5 159.50 M C DU_'_ r = DU IF ME NT SUPPLIES 7 9M1 ?0 126 /FS 21 .''?PAC 0' EA EGU Tr MENT SUPFLZES 304.51 199P14 16/26 /85 27.3C.M'PL= WOOD REVIE:f PLIR LISN? G 1o9r4 6/26 85 38 .:0 MIPLEW000 REVIEW M* MEERShIF 65.3 1b95 b/2.6 /E 5 27.24 P INNESOTA BLUEPRINT SUPPtiES 1Eyw5y 6/26!$5 75.53 MZ hNESGTA BLUEPRINT SLPPL?ES 1C2. • 1 Z6/26/ E5 873.9t?PDT4RGLA INC CCfYTRACT fYM 873.00 1 b9l1y5 r /26/95 115 .'70 WRPA MEMEERS IP 115 *70 ! 1 Si S F 6 ! c 6 P 5 J ..M U `V' N E r DENNIS C R K E C C T S 20 . * C 169 uo /27/95_1.369.63 - --NIFTH ST PAUL CITY UTILITIES 2.7/85 53910 ORTH ST PAUL CITY UTILITILS 1,422.73 * 1985 CITY OF MAFLr -600 CHECK REGISTER CHECK hC.CA F AMOUNT NORVE_ D DES C R I P T I 01 189h5C,b/27/e5 235950 N IRTHWES TER h 8ELL SUPPLIES1p9A5rC6 / c7 /85 NrRTHw 8FLL S5'-. 1a9N5r L6 /27/ t 38.9(N^ :FTHWEST_R h BELL SUPPLIESj6/27185 38.90 hrRTri WEST:RAErLL St UPFLIES189N5:L 1 . 27 /359,31 NOFTHWESTER K SELL SUPPLIES19N5'i:6/7!/85 S 19.50 ArRTH4ESTERA ECLL SUPPLIES1b9A5r39.00 ACFT4WEIST -RN HELL SUPPLIES1b9N56/27/A5 38,4p i W SART - TAR 0 S UP F L,I E S i 1895 189ti5' 2 2W R5 50,16 A,RTHWEST =RN BELL SUPPLTES 6l27 5 16.30 A ^RTHwEST£.RA ErLL SUPPLIES169A5 _96/27/ - R5 116.39 NPFTNWES TER N BELL SUPPL *ES109N It 9N5L. 6 /27 /F5 j89. 5 AOPTHWEST -Rh EELL _.._SUPPLIES 6/27/85 67995 R- 3RT4wE.STL PE'LL SLPPL_ES1F9X56 /27/ F_`h1 . RO.. _..KOA THW EST FR l FELL SUPP LIES 1 •2 3-J . 26 1ayhS5 7/5 14,U BUT =SAN L TRAVEL TRlIN1'VE 14,0 t t : :ftf 189C4f:f 6/27/85 2490 D3MTNT3N BRUSH REPAIR TAINT 249.' f 169P25 26127/85 5D 0 rEBT MARti'CK C3N1h2 f 500 970 1 9A36 26/2 co 113.98 P= TROL"UP MAIN'T SLPFLTES1t9c3RL6 /27/85 59.54 P TR3LEUM MAI NT SuPFLIES 173.52 f i 1d9;142 6/27/85 26920 PTCKW:CK DISC SKS SUPPLIES1t9r-42 6/21/85 1.4$-_ -P l CKw: CK Oi;C RKS SUPPL:FS 2 4 , 2 * 1a9A45 6 /2TI85 74,r0 PFT'UEY 80WES LEAS= EGL!F lb9F5^X6/27/85 1 •10C;. ^0 -P13T"A STER PCSTAGE 0 t 198 CITY OF MAFLEUCOD CHECK REOISTTR CHECK NO* DATE AMOUNT YENDtR ITEM DESCFIFTTON IF9c52 0-6/2718 `_26099.00 FLLAR CHEV ECUiP!EAT 26 • 399 • D D 1t9G64 6/27 f 5 1- 4 :`() _________._._.__.PRETTNER JOSE TFAIIEL ,.! FJ 1b9P65 5 14 1 3 •PK IEP_ _ I P SL 1 3. 1e9fzc4 6/27/85 9.95 RACIO SHA4K SLPPLIES 9.95 * 189 X6/27/$5 290.RANSEY CCUNTY CONTRAV FYM 1EyOr9 6/27 /b5 1 •153.99 RA *SEY COUNTY 4?CFCFIL% 189 -r9 6/27/85 2.54 PAMSEY CCUNTY _._ ._ .CONTRACT FYM 1 :185.54 tii 19F39 h/27/F5 7.25 R'LHAR0S SUPPL? S FROG To9P39 6/27/85 12.7$ - --R :CH4R0S -- -- _-_ _SUP PL :ES FRCC 169F39 6 /27/8:1 P•53 RICHA RD SUFFLIEE FFCC 1E9F3r 16/27/25 5,Q1 R.CHAPOS SUPPLIES FRCS 189F39 6/27/85 9.19 RTCHAROS - - _. _- --- _..___....__ _SUPPLIES FRCC 53.6 Ib9R4S L6/2785 124.67 ROAD RESCUE SUPPLIES 124.57 lb9Sr2 x'6/27=/85 17.6n S I D LOCK SAFE SIPPL:ES 169!,.2 6/27/85 4.20 S 0 LO SAFE SLPPL ?ES 1895 :2 6 /27 /85 22.? fl S b 0 LOCK SAFc SUr FLI ES 1 95.:3 C6 1,27 15.60?SPS UFFIC =' PR CD CFFICE SLFPLT"S 1b9SC'3 6/27/85 41060 SrS OFFICE PRCC OFFICE SLFFLTiS 16W C6 /21 / 85 24.0 SPS 5FFI CT PR C9 CFFICE S LFPL srS Ia9S - 0 3 6/7-7/85 56.64 SPS OFFICE' PRCC OFF :CE SLFFL ?:.S 1 37. 4 1cs9 Sr5 6/2i 28.34 S S T OFF ICE OFFICE SLFFLI:.S 19F5 CITY OF MAFLEi*COJ CHECK REGISTER CHECK nCot G• TE A 40UNT WE NO CC!I GESCFIF7IC 1 a95 ^5 ti6 /27 /P 5 13.23 S 9 T OFFICE OFFICE S LFPL If S 139I 6 /27185_.___152 . 42 --- -- --T OFFICE.OFFICE SLFPL iES ld9Cr 6/2.7/85 29.92 S 6 T OFFICE CFF:CE SLFFLIfS ld9S75 6/27/85 46.40 S 8 T OFFICE OFFICE SL:FPL:V'S 795''S 6 /2)7 /E: w 142.68 S R T CFF'CE GFFICE SLFPLZtS ld9Sr5 J' 6/27 /85 2.36 S R T DFF'_C£ 99_99. OFF ICE SLfPL I =S 415.75 I 9'%F5 5 Ci612.718 5 724. 1)SP =CI ALTV RAP.IO SUPPLIEt 724 . 0 1695:) F 6/27/85 106 ST PAUL C.TY OF CONTRACT FYM 1u955 rb /2T /2 05975 ST PAUL CITY CF tChTRACT fY 18955)6 /2.718 5 2U^.1C ST PAUL CITY OF CCNTR#t4CT FYM 1Q955r 6/641.35 ST PAUL CITY OF CC (TRACT FYN 1byS7 ST PAUL CITY OF C NTRACI FYM 1095 Q 5/27/E5 228.65 ST PAUL CITY CF CChTRACT. FVM 1691S5r 6/27/85 17.50 ST PAUL CITY CF PH370 SERVICES 1,487925 1R9S 7 ti C 6/27/f :825 72 STANDARD SPG ALIGN SUPPLIES 1Ef 825.72 1c9S2 j6/27185 131.13 STeTE OF MN DtiT CONTRACT FYI! 131.13 t 189729 L6/27/85 19211.14 T.A.SC+4!FSKY SINS CZNTAACT Fyn! 109T29 6/27/8! --2,65609 _T. A. SCH SONS __.StPFLI<< FFCC 3,E67.53 18973;, ;,6/2T/85....172.3E T -T A RG _SUPPLIES FRCS 1697.3:.:06/27/85 27.3C TARGET SUPFL:ES PRO( It973Z X6/27/85 2C5.7O TARGET SLPFLIcS FRGC 405.30 169T65 J6/27/85 4.841,28 TKCA CONTRACT FYM 4R41.24 1a9T75 L6 /27/8 t 6,414 TPcICEY OIL FUEL 0 - IL 6,414.1 9 s :ft•* r pale : a r 1980 5 C T TY J F MA FL E U00D CHECK REGISTER CHECK ti ^.DATA AMOUN _._._VZNDC?ITEM CESCFIFTIC 1 e 9 U i 5 06 /2-7/ F 5 50L. ..__U.S. C T V L . r_ -- MLMBERSf- IF 1e9L5U 06 0 r5$•'S UN !FORMS U NLI WITED UNI f Cp M,s 18900 06/27/85 11.2*UkTFQKMS NLIMITCD UNI 1K91;S'6/27/805 19 INIF2 UNLIMITED UNIFCtc ivS 189L5 b/27/85 86.28 UNIFORMS Ut#LI!"ZTED UNIFCPNS 1p90w E6/27IE5 59.16 UN FORMS UNLZZTED UNIFORMS 1e9U5C 06/27/85 71.96 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS Ib9L 0 6 /27/85 141 LII FJPMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 189L5r27/8 155.32 UNIFORMS UNLIMITEO UNIFORMS , 1 F9L5 ;,076 /27/ E 5 53 :32 UN MS UNLIv1 TE0 UNIF CRMS Ib9L5Ci 6/27/85 49,80 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNTFCRMS 189U5.:X6/27/85 85.''C U":TFOOMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS Ib9U5 {1 32.5 ! __.__ _06/2718,U N'F 0 2 s U`# L I T i?UNI f R M S 1u90c b /271 E 5 29 UNTF R MS UNLIMITED UKI FORMS 169L5ti 06/27/85 71.UNTFOR4S UNLIMITED Lk.FCFO!S lt9U5 c 6/27/85 34.16 U''i'FO 'MS UNLIMAI TED UAI FORMS 1e9U5Lj 6/27 /85 52.20 UN F:;aMS UN- LIM TED UNI FORMS 1R9L5 =;6 /27 /u5 138.'TU`VIF RMS UNLIMITEC - -UNIFORMS 1690,6 12 1805 16.1 b_.._ -Ut'TFORMS UNLI MZTE#3 UNI F CRMS 1 690 ^.6!27! /8 c 252.90 UAIF'R MS 1! #LIMTT`D UNIFORMS 189L5`L6 /27/805 ^___.35•'0 UN?FuRMS UNLIMITED UiIFCR!!S 1 9655.27 169yi 5 x.6 /27 /85 27.29 VaLS BODY SHOP V =! Rm- A . 27.29 169V r 6/27-/85 73940 VW EIlTCK- ASSOC SL PLIES 73.40 169W21 cJ6/27/8,9.99 WIRN:.RS ATRUEVALU _SLPP L!Ec 169 6127/85 4.89 __..._ _WARNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 1 o/27/SS 1088 WARNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 1 9u2i 6 127 IF 5 59.4 t ON- RS TRUE V 1LU SUPPLIES 189 .21 16/27/85 25.87 W! R+V: R S TRUE VALU SUPPL I ES 1o9w2 6 7.35 W1 RNE RS,TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 1a9621 b /2T /B5 69.rr WIRNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 1e9w21 76/271E5 11098 WA: FN _RS TRUE VALU SUPLIcc 10901 X0 /27 /85 8300 Wf RNr-RS 70UE VALU SLPPLTE'S 169W21 6/271E5 _39.31 WARNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 33 3 1t9w51,06/2.7/85 37.08 lmrBER- TRCSETH INC SUPFLTES q/ . 13 1985 CITY OF MAPLEUCOD CHECK RE.GTSTrR CHECK NC.CATE AM V _ND0 P.DESCRIPITEMDESCRIP _O 169 W5 ^D 6/2718:13.!7D V£QE R- TR OSETH INC SUPPLIES 189w5C CHI ? R b /27 ! ES 53.1 D-RTCH& RDS GORDON UTI LITIES 0 53olO --------RICHA GORP - - --UTIIITI.EC.. 109 *0 11.56 FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL MOV FUND 03 TOTAL NYD F A bT CH A D G E 5,9'40 .98 FUND - - -11 TOTA _ - -_PARK DEVELCF EA? 1 _6 ^7 FUND 13 TOTAL C.:.P. 2,54 FUND 39 TOTAL I -4 MCCLELLANC 67.5(3 FUND 47 TOTAL 78 =13 MILL16CCC t 38.63 FUND 51 TOTAL 84.13 C I 631.48-Fv*. .1 D 7 TOTAL 81 -21 W E AVEFEW 7, 429,16 IFU40 9C TOTAL SANITARY SEU EP f 9,9C6.14 -FUl D 9E TOT AL WEHI CLE 8 EG L IP 1 54 .145.4 4 T CTA L ITEMS FINANCED BY RECREATIONAL FEES 10-4474 E 2 5 DAVID C I Y J F M A p L EWO pR10PRGRAM PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REP[ L^ ' ^= i L Lr ,.Alm NU. EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME .PAY KATHLEEN M 63.44 J 242.40 01966 01-0109 GREAVU JOHN 'C 400~00 s 01967 01-0480 WASILUK CHARLOTTE P 325.00 l 13 1 BAET IAN RY m1969 01-8088 ANDERSON NORMAN G 325.00 1686 40 0170 01-9035 MAIDA MARYLEE T 325 00 i ' 01979 22-0614 HAGEN ARLINE DIVISIN 01 LEGISLATIVE 2712-4 1700.0 01981 22-7550 VIGNALO DELORES A 1p DIVISION a 172 ' Q2-9671 BEHM LOIS N 729 60 DIVISION 02 CITY MANAGER 2989. 83 10-4474 JAHN DAVID Z 131.28 L^ ' ^= i L Lr ,.Alm 01975 12-0124 DOHERTY KATHLEEN M 63.44 01976 12-166 CUDE LARY J 242.40 I57 G0 D^%SI EME G E z 1 78 21 l078 FAUSTST DANIEL F 1686 40 DIVISION 2 % FINANCE ADM I N I STRAT I ON 1686,40 01979 22-0614 HAGEN ARLINE J 1071.63 2712-4 01981 22-7550 VIGNALO DELORES A 770a 40 DIVISION 22 ACCOUNTING EG.26. 84 0 uAE k:.`1w.l1:- /8,. C I T Y a E M A P L E W O 4 1 0 RAM P R 1:2) PAYROLL CHECK. REGI REPO GROSS --- i NUS EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY 1 19 8 AU REL I US LUC I LLE E 1556, 01 0 1 j 3 3 31 --'81 SCHADT J L 4 DIVISION 31 CITY CLER ADMINISTRATION 1559.89 t 01. 8 33--4 14 tea V I ETO R LO R RA I NE S 730.96 r,.c 33 -4994 HENSLE PATRICIA A i 0 8j - ---- . -._ate1.6 16-6)RE C - ,+ s - J M 1 Z) '3 3 41 -1717 COLLINS KENNETH V 1751. 20 0 1 9* 4 — 2 tiJ 5 V R I C H I E C f"1 t L. LE L.6, 1 r Lam. 0 t't { f ---i . "'i"t... 1 'i ,.t I q - -- — ._._. _.._.y...1 i"f '•i I i -- ----_ _--J . _.. 0 . 'x r . u 3 iEL .S:. rN ROBERTDERT D 15,28 00 19 r L..r A. . , .i i..l i #'" i i 1 ti.t ..J E J L 1 L! _*'' i. 2 1 *f" i I Stai i 'C D .k Y Z -- i i' i.i b..' i... . - i " L.. L.i f i . s - — ZAPPA JOSEPH A-1440 0l'2' J1 STILE VER,-%10 N T 1 7r 26 f, l 337 4 0'3'3 0 MOREL.L I RAYMOND J 1207 E) 04 S"EEE.N SCOTT L.1078 La 000 r'- -13 8 LEE ROGER W i`'. S x_'1 1 4-- f .. r r DAN I C.JOHN J 4. 00 '42--1 :LAO SON DALE S C4 42 '2 152 THOMALL.A DAVID J 1 0 8. 9S 0 2Q 06 42-ATCH I SON JOHN H 1268.89 1 :: ' 7 4"' ;.' 1 KO RTUS DONALD v 134. 93 009 42 -35' 1 LANG RICHARD J 1268.89 06/DATE25/85 C%TY OF MApLEWO PROGRAM PR10 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REP[ GROBS --- mHm Pmcxnvcc m/'wnE:o ^m^^c ~`= DZVISION 43 PARAMEDIC SERVICES 11651.83 17 4-1878 EBERTSON JAMES 02@10 42-4B01 RYAN MICHAB_P 145 65 a 02011 42-4916 HERBERT MICHAEL J 1268.89 0/42720 Q2N1 42-748 BERGERON JOSEPH 788 96 r vE nw, um 2N14 42-7686 MEEHAN JRo JAMES E 1262 9 9 c !--GREEN AN ,4 02016 42-8226 STAFNE GREGORY L 1229 G 748.00 0232 46-N2 STAHNKE A 672.80 42-8516 HALWEG KEVIN R 1378.74 mTnum'6 140 4 T RBZ 20, 34 46-519 02N19 42-967 BOWMAN RICK A 106 6 46-700 DT VISIOW SHAWN 42 POLICE "ERVICES 672.80 30469 29 784.80 02037 4G-9B7 MADELL RAYMOND M 672. 80 4J- 0 L 9 KARIS FLINT D 108 n=1 3 ' c~nEm N222 43-0918 NELSON CAROL M 1407. 36 i 223 43-1789 GRAF DAVID M 1278.12 44!519 43-4316 RAZSKAZOFF DALE E 1278.12 202G 43-6071 VORWEBK ROBERT E l300.B3 rlI E E Anu[7w - 4 EKR RONALD D 1346. 5 DZVISION 43 PARAMEDIC SERVICES 11651.83 17 4-1878 EBERTSON JAMES S r vE nw, um 02031 46-0183 RAP, INE JANET L 748.00 0232 46-N2 STAHNKE JULIE A 672.80 cS mTnum'6 140 4 20, 34 46-519 NELSON KAREN A 770.40 0235 46-700 MARTIN SHAWN M 672.80 0.2 423 784.80 02037 4G-9B7 MADELL RAYMOND M 672. 80 i D','ISION 46 DISPATCHING SERV 5722.74 241 52 0547 MEYER W DATE 6/25/85 C % T Y O F M A P L E W O A PROGRAM PR10 MICHAEL PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REPO 06.NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY 02039 51-3174 WEGWERTH JUDITH A 620.73 G38 40 241 52 0547 MEYER GERALD W 104 8 K NE MICHAEL R 974. 37 ON 5 STREET MAINTENANCE 7 54 PUBLIC WORKS DL'-DG MAINT Go m NADEAU EDWARD A 997 29 5 8 -- - -GEORGE 40 own F 0 5 I b1.J ,_t C I T Y Q F M A P L. E W 0s.... .1 PROGRAM PR 1 O PAYROLL. CHECK RES I S T ER REPi H i-,- ---•__ I EMPLOYEE NUMDER NAME PAY i c. ....t 1 Ljt' -' 1 tT ;t NU , E LAYERNE O 145uj• 48 58 —:.: BREHE I M ROGER W 970-40 4 3 r ANDERSON ROBERT s f +4 3 J6C OWEN GERALD c 1008..00 8 SA1`; ' I 7.: =8.g MACDONALD JOHN# E 1046.40 J D I '' i 0 - N ' VEH & -EQUI MA 4. NT 2099.20 O,:.; Etom-,A RD RUP RT D 1 r 1. ' ti .. G. I ,J K R U M M E L. BAR ate.' A d l A A 33 1 5 r ist .+ ST PAS L. I N 1 T , j , " 2 D j .. y _ 8 i COMM SERVICES ADM I N X69.+8. 58 7S TOW LEY MICHAEL F 400. NTE 7 5 C ME 8 TROY O 378. )0 0, 1 Ji.- -78. R - I A WARREN J 380,00 7' S RADA h I CHHE I 4 4z.t '...1 ... ESETH711 '01 8. --t3 i ? RONALD L 49a %J FA - 7 f B RENNE R JAY A 400 r 8 Tt3Y 1040'00 4 j1r.. - — — _ — — - - - - - '-- may_.. .... ..- . •. ..... - .... _ .. - . _.. - .,. -- _ .. ... .. .... —.•._ . .... .._ ... . ..._ ... .. .,,,....... ....a......... - . ..w.. ..... _. - r.. —.. ._..e - -- r DATE06/25/85 CITY OF MAp'LEWO PROGRAM PR10 ' PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REP[ lE N NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY m22'o3 63-0170 S|wHuS LAURA J 163o93 02089 63-0175 ANDERSON CHRISTINE M 114.75 r SETTLES 0209 1 63-0913 MITCHELL MARY T 85. 600 o 2092 63-1037 FISCHER SUSAN M 13. 69 4' . ° KANE KAREN A 103 75 2095 63-2196 ANDERSON BARBARA J 86.11 PANN? 020g7 G3-214 pROCHNOW JO 84,00 c 02098 63-3203 WALLACE JON T 310.00 R -nn 63-3628 GRAF MICHAEL J 121 13 63-4246 WARD ROY G 375.20 02103 63-5370 SPANNBAUER EVA C 94 56 G3-5435 SPANNBAUER SUSAN L 7 ~ 20 5654 HAMM DEADRA M 236.25 0 TER~~.'L TA a 0 ^-^°nQ-noEn nAnIm zm 211 63-7456 STEFFEN KIMBERLY 1 z 4 7 LEMANSKI AMY M 109. 98 | 63 RECREATION PROGRAMS 4141.93 C2115 64-4624 I} IV I S ION 64 GREW JANET M 88.8 SCUT TER RIS-3 TINE --- - 404.40 HORSNELL JUDITH A 353.20 NATURE CENTER 1566.40 02116 71-0r51 OLSON GEOFFREY W 1552.00 n r n umm.mm J%^IcI r z DIVISION 63 RECREATION PROGRAMS 4141.93 C2115 64-4624 I} IV I S ION 64 GREW JANET M 88.8 SCUT TER RIS-3 TINE --- - 404.40 HORSNELL JUDITH A 353.20 NATURE CENTER 1566.40 02116 71-0r51 OLSON GEOFFREY W 1552.00 n r n umm.mm J%^IcI r z PROGRAM PR10ftPROGRAM CHECK REGISTE REP 6j211 74-077 WENGER ROBERT i._ 2122 74-9223 GI RARD LAWRENCE 74 HEALTH INSPECTIONS i FUND NOT ON FILE SRAND TOTALS 126615.38 z GROSS_NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY i 2 —7 718 EKSTRAND THOMAS 998-79 s 021_19 72-8505 JOHNSON RAND L 928 i--_-DIVIC 7 PLANNING 1926o79 LZVIG77'------OS iM-----RJORIE 1281.G0 6j211 74-077 WENGER ROBERT i._ 2122 74-9223 GI RARD LAWRENCE 74 HEALTH INSPECTIONS i FUND NOT ON FILE SRAND TOTALS 126615.38 z J 1064.00 M 155.00 l219.0 12G615.38 J 1064.00 M 155.00 l219.0 12G615.38 E -1 MEMORANDUM .lotion b Courioil; Endorsed,... Modified-_,,.. ReJ ected.___.___ Date T0: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: Budget Changes for Insurance CostsDATE: June 28, 1985 At the last Council meeting, authorization •was given far new insurancecontractswhichcosignificantlymorethanre ' insurance vi ous contracts.Preliminary estimates have been made of the insurance premium allocationbetweenfundsandbetweenyears. These e •estimates indicateCate .that budgettransfersareneededtocovertheinsurancecostsSomeofthesebudgettransferswi11-have to be made from the unreserved portion of fund equitydutoinadequatecontingencyaccountbalancces. The following budgettransfersarerecommended: There will be sufficient money in the budgets of the e Sewer and PayrollBenefitFundstofinancetheirportionoftheinsuranceremiumsnotedthatp •. Also,i t should be n t the above amounts do not include premiums for anunbrellaliabilitypolicyasaquotehasnotbeenrei ' th ce ved yet and it sunlikelytthispolicywouldbepurchased. DFF:1nb FROM Contingency Unreserved Account Fund Lquit 27,770 General Fund 45080 249020 Hydrant Char e F ndau599a010a0V.E.M. Fund 37,790 34,510 Total There will be sufficient money in the budgets of thee Sewer and PayrollBenefitFundstofinancetheirportionoftheinsuranceremiumsnotedthatp •. Also,i t should be n t the above amounts do not include premiums for anunbrellaliabilitypolicyasaquotehasnotbeenrei ' th ce ved yet and it sunlikelytthispolicywouldbepurchased. DFF:1nb MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT /OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: Request lotion by Council : Endors e Modif i ed.......-- -_... City Manager RajeQte Associate Planner -- Johnson fat Time Extension - -PUD and Preliminary Plat Mailand Road and Sterling Street Marvin Anderson Construction Company Crestview Forest June 24, 1985 Approval of a time extension for the Crestview Forest lann ' ment and prel P ed unitdevelopmentpminaryplat. Proposal 1. See the applicant's letter of request on page 6qP9 .2. See the phasing plan on page 5. Comments The applicant is making a good -faith effort to developop this PUD in atimely. manner. The final plat . re nest' for Phase ' Phases q 3 will be madeshortlYes3and4areexpectedtobecompletedby1989. Recommendation 41 3 Approve a four -year time extension for the lanned unit portion P developmentandforthepofthepreliminaryplatdesignatedasPhases3 4and5 BACKGROUND Past Actions 5- 15 -80: 1. Council approved the Crestview Forest preliminary plat, subject to conditions which included the "redesignation of the common areas as outlots." 2. Council approved the Crestview Forest PUD, subject to community design review board approval of the building scale design and location of the structures relative to nearby single dwelling uses. The CDRB approved the site and building plans on 9-23-80, 9 -4 -80: Council approved a 90 -day time extension for the Crestview Forest preliminary plat. 10 -16 -80 Council approved the final plat for Phase 1 of the PUD. 6- 27 -83: Council approved: 1. A two -year time extension for the PUD . 2. A two -year time extension for the portion of the preliminary plat lying east of Sterling Street: 3. The final plat for the Crestview .Forest Second Addition (Phase 2) . Planning 1. Section 36-442(e) states that "all conditional use permits shall be reviewed by council within one year of the initial approval. At that i PP time council may specify an indefinite term or specific term not to exceed five years for subsequent reviews." 2. Section 1005(e) of the subdivision code provides that for one year following prel imi nary approval and for two years following final plat approval "unless the subdivider and the city agree otherwise, no amendment to a comprehensive plan or official control shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedication or platting required or permitted by the approved application. Thereafter, pursuant to its regulations, the city may extend the period by agreement with the subdivider and subject to all applicable performance conditions and requirements, or it may require submission of a new application, unless substantial h sical activityPYY and investment has occurred in reasonable reliance on the approved 2 application and the subdivider will suffer substantial financial damage as a consequence of a requirement to submit a new application. In connection with a subdivision involving planned and staged development, the city by resolution and agreement grant the rights referred to herein for such periods of time lon er than two ears which it determines to be reasonable and appropriate." 7w Enclosures 1. Location Map 2. Crestview Forest Planned Unit Development /Phasing Plan 3. Applicant's Letter of Request 3 IL V OWO Ou. UPPER AFTON RD. 2 Ll C=:] T2AN R22W 21 LOWER AFTON R0. , ON IN LA. ~2 W Ci AV 68 A MAILA R0. _ o • O tl c3)21% Q a.1) t. .0 0 t2) TEAKw IVE 3) CREST V w DRIVE z Undeveloped 0 0 0 0 City Park 25 2 23 L I NwooO AVE. AVE 72 W Z1. y Oi T28N W ~ T -R22W R21W Z Z - 1318 Q = C) 4CeAv t Q 72 I 1 HIGHWOOD AVE. 14 74 25 Q1 AVE. coy EMITZ ST. SOUTHCREST DR T2 ;, Attachment 1 LOCATION MAP 4 Q N IM 1) E Sit y C rr do" flow kfiv ID/ rft r I IiI w. Oc PHASE #1 __ lei E i I IL j 1 t • • 0 ' Vr[MTn i 1 r 7 U1ll.l1lW ! SASE `b ! ..• 1 . ... t'' ' • t Athl eii c.- Faci 1 i ti es LO 1 ,. MOCK i Q l - • rwr r I rwr M • MrwM • an+r • . PHASE # 1--32 UNITS 24 ARLc.' = PHASE #2 ---16 UNITS., 14 ARE SOLD PHASE #3 ---28 UNIT4 TO BE STAR7ED IN 1985 PHAScr" # 4 # .8 UNITS FUTURE STARTS ( 1737 4, , `75 ---5 6 DENOTES SOLD U CRESTVIEW FOREST PHASING PLAN Attachment 2 5 N mare nderson BETTER HOMES FOR BETTER WANG MARVIN H. ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 8101 IYNDALE AVENUE BOUTH MIKNEArOLIa, F May 17, 1985 Mayor John G reavu City of Maplewood c/o Mr. Randy Johnson 1902 East County Road 6 Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mayor Greavu : TELEPHONE 881 -2661 5oth lAnrnIvwr j 1982 I respectfully request a time extension for our 132 unit PUD of Crestview Forest. In April of 1981, we opened pur townhome models for new sales. in the last four years we have had 38 sales which gave us to date about 10 sales per year. We had . hoped for twice that many, but due to high property taxes in earlier years and the potential of a land fill site adjacent to our property, sales have been difficult. Now in 1985 we have constructed the swimming pool for our townhome association, the tennis court was completed last year, we have a new sales force and traffic in our sales office has increased. We are more optimistic about 'our future in Maplewood. Phase 1 and 2 . a s shown on the attached map shows a total of 48 units with about 80% of them sold at this time. Phase 3 final plat will be submitted to the city council in the summer of 1985 with construction of new homes in the late fal 1 . Phase 4 and 5 will begin as needed in the future. The total units left to be built are 94 out of 132 o r i g i n a l planned units. Our new sales force tells us with the new interest in this area we can expect about 15 to 20 sales per year. This will give us to about the year 1989. We hope sales will be better but this is our estimate at this time. We once again thank the city council and staff personnel for th ier continued support regarding our housing communities in Maplewood. Sincerely, MARVIN H NDE SON CONSTRUCTION CO Frederic E. Haas Vice Pres. Land Development FEH /lw • t. f r Attachment 3 6 W1 MEMORANDUM A0tfCM by. Council: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: PROJECT: DATE: City Manager Endorse Planner ie Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Modif Planned Unit Dev e 1 opment Renewal Rea eate McMenemy Street and Sloan Place Date St. Paul Business Center (Donald Bachmeier) St. Paul Business Center East July 1, 1985 SUMMARY Request Renewal of a PUD for three service commercial buildings, Project Description 1. Building area: 85,000 square feet 2. Types of use: 65% office and 35% warehouse space3. Refer to page 6 for the site plan. Comments Council conditions and code requirements are being met. Recommendation Renewal of the PUD for the St. Paul Business Center East for , one Y ear . BACKGROUND Site Description 10 Acreage: 6.8 acres 20 Existing land use: St. Paul Business Center East (under construction) Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Skillman Avenue, single dwellings fronting Sloan Place and an apartment fronting Skillman Avenue Westerly: I -35E. Across I -35E is the St. Paul Business Center Southerly: NCR building, Sloan Place and Parkside Fire Station Easterly: McMenemy Street, undeveloped land and single dwellings Past Action 5- 22 -84: The community design review board denied the applicant's request for site plan approval. The board felt that their review should be conducted after the use had been approved by council. 6- 11 -84: Council conditionally approved a PUD for this development. 7- 10 -84: The board conditionally approved building elevations. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 10 Land use plan designation: LSC, limited service commercial 2. Zoning: F, farm residential 39 Section 36 --442 of the zoning code states the following regarding conditional use permits and PUDs : e) All conditional use permits shall be reviewed by the council within one. year of the date of initial approval. At that review the council may specify an indefinite term or specific term, not to exceed five years, for subsequent reviews. The council may impose new or a d d i t i o n a l conditions upon the permit at the time of the initial or subsequent reviews. A conditional use permit shall remain in effect as long as the conditions agreed upon are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Any conditional use that meets the agreed upon conditions is later disallowed because of the city enacting or amending official controls shall be considered a legal nonconforming use, jc Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 3 i I A9 IL r w J J ' W N Q 0 LITTLE CANADA n I][] uv 58 Ito- • LARK AV V 19 IN G 36 AURIE RD. cc t < e IE y e KUR E V.4 LDRIDG h E AVi rn - KLMO LAA B El M ONT aKI n AX or 58 sKIL.L1lAN . W c CO TT MT. VER AVE W _ RNO o E O t W Q AVE. W a 91 6 Li luEL0AVE. BELL c Q z 4n AVE 0 W F 10 < 'g s • h KING AVE. 4 W PR ICE AVE. o 57 ST. PAUL a LOCATION MAP Attachment one 4 4 N to 1 O r 12.4 ac s O 60 ST. PAUL BUSINESS PUD CENTER r r at r r r r , a J ! 0 1 , Sto Freo.•ded 0) 1 Oak CP lop' Q' iu N i 1.5 - IA x ZOS- to f +00 Steak , i 34, A _ ST. PAUL 6OARD IOU Q OF REALTORS JN A1P 00 o .. MIND WIN PROPERTY LINE / ZONIN.G MAP 5 Attachment two i N 3 C, 1 I ' v 1 N EW0 V F 4 N NC 4i6l.- 4 39 o ( 8 7 1 a O -r o N 6 t39ac..Q 02 9.. Z! ° o 5 9 V95 EW0 V F 4 N 0 1oo-- 898 a r 3!O 2. 5q port.h scale 1' — SO• PARKINOd e5t else &12-- 35%. service ..'30 required 30t r.. provided 1313 8LDO& AREAS bldg.# 1 37800. OF fbld0.#9 'a• 31500 bidg.f3 15-.00 total 85 #F MY 31' T. PAUL BUSINESS CENTER E o.10 & - f ourre`Inc. zFarntii•ar+e SITE PLAN 6 Attachment three 4 N 4t 4 - , 9 M3 MEMORANDUM Action by Gouncii : To: Barry Evans, City ManagerFrom: R indorseRobertD. Odegard , Director of Community ServicesSubj : $50 Donation From ModifieoMaplewoodCoinClub Date: June 21, 1985 Rej ecte.d.,,,,_, Date We are in receipt of a check for $50.00 from the Maplewood •p ewood Coin Club whichmeetsattheMaplewoodHeritageCenter. I request that the City Council accept this contribute •on and designate itforthepurchaseofcardtablechairstobeusedattheHeritageCenter. AletterexpressingourthanksandratitudewillbesentCoinClub. 9 e t to the Maplewood r; Action by Council. Endorsed Modifie Re j e cte ci........._..,...... Date MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: City Clerk DATE: July 1, 1985 RE: Industrial Revenue Note Western State Bank has applied for a $2,300,000.00 Industrial Revenue Note to finance the construction of an office building at 1740 Rice Street. t APPLICATION /AGREEMENT FOR TAX EXEMPT .,. 1!C T =`t SC)r i C J. t MORTGAGE REVENUE NOTE FINANCING T h i s Agreement is hereby entered into between the City of Maplewood,9 Minnesota, hereinafter called the "City and WAV Inc. hereinafter called the "applicant". f The applicant is requesting finan for a development project and desires th at the City issue notes according to the terms o MunftheMun Industrial Development Act of 1967 as amended. In order for the application to' be considered by the City, the applicant hereby agrees to pay all costs involved in the legal and fiscal review of the proposed project and all costs involved in the issuance of said notes to finance the project. It is further agreed and understood that the City reserves the right to9 . deny any application for financing in any stage of the proceedings prior to adopting the resol u t 'l on authorizing the : ssuance of notes. 1. APPLICANT: a. Business Name - WAV Inc. b. Business Address - 1740 Rice Street, Maplewood, MN 55113 c. Business Form (corporation, :Faxtmxsbc mlex c. Authorized Representative - Dennis J. Prchal or A. William Sands e. Telephone. - 487 -2051 Z. NAME(S) OF MAJORITY STOCKHOLDERS, OFFICERS & DIRECTORS, PARTNERS, PRINCIPALS: a. Western Bancshares, Inc. 1.00% b. A. William Sands — Director, President, CEO, CFO, Treasurer co Robert P. Sands — Director, Vice President, Secretary d. e . 3. INCLUDE A PROPERTY LINE MAP SHOWING EXACT LOCATION OF PROPERTY, NAMES OF ADJACENT STREETS, AND DIMENSIONS OF PROPERTY. 4. NATURE OF BUSINESS a. Briefly describe the project proposal _ ownership, improvement and o eration of real estate used by Western State Bank of St. Paul and others. 9 s associated with an existing Maplewood Business? b. Is the project as 9 Yes x No if yes: Relocation Expansion x Reha M i ation 3. AMOUNT GP CITY FINANCING BEING REQUESTED: $ 2, 300, 0.00 6, PURPOSE OF REQUESTED FINANCING.t purposea. urBusiness ose to be served. Construction-of banking house and commercial office building of 24,696 gross square feet* i purpose to be served. Increase tax base; provide long -term and b. Public p p short —term employment; and prevent migration of educated residents 7. BUSINESS PROFILE: from the City and the State* a. Numoer of employees in Maplewood: Full Time Part Time Before this Project _ 6 4 After this project 65 6 b. Projected annual sales $ 1,500,000 + Tenants c. Projected annual payroll: $ 1 8. NAMES OF: a. Financial consultant for the business: Eberhardt Company b. Legal counsel for the business: Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. c. Corporate counsel: Fredrikson & Byron, P . A. 9, WHAT IS YOUR TARGET DATE FOR: a. Construction start: July 15, 1985 b. Construction completion: March 15, 1986 W A V I c am p licant nature of epresen a i ve A. William Sands President Title June 12, 1985 Date The following items must be submitted with this application to the Community Development Department: 1 0 A f i l i n g fee of 1% of the issue amount - $20,000 maximum; First $1,000 to accompany application. 2. A resolution setting a hearing date 3. Anapplication to the Commissioner of Securities for approval of M u n i c i p a l 1 nrlus tr i M 1 Revenue Bond project . h n uest i ons on items 2 or 3, call the City C 1 erk , L uc i 11 a Aure 1 i us ,If you ave a y q -770 45 Z0. Y MORTGAGE REVENUE NOTE CRITERIA Adopted 1 0-1-81 of i n i t i ons i n industryA• resently opera g s shall1 be defined as a p o f o erationa1 history Exi siting Bushes t 1 -east one year P 1 enterprise with a or commerc i a within the City erc i a l enterprise an industrial or comet shall be define d as exist business* y 2 New Business s an exstqualifya which does not 4 t le ibility Guidelines of theg. proP - E g d plans vith the overall Des Review hall be compatible and C 9 1. The project s m re i ve Plans Zoning i nc 1 ud i n9 the Co PCity,, t Board Standards n i f i cant amount of public expenditures t shall11 not requ i re a S i 9 and waterma i ns 2 The proje oads, Sewers for City improvem ents such as r n existing hat the City wishes to business t ro •ect shal 1 involve a . wishes to attract3 . Thep business wh i ch the City expand or ' new a. Existingin Business Criteria Any of an existing business ation, or rehabilitation An expansion, reloc New Businessb . Criteria new em loyment, Opportunities, based upon the offers significant P nd basis, or1. use on a yearnatureofthe arOU a vacant or scheduf involves the rehab o 2. The protect env to be vacated structure, o r l_ d development or redeye is within a designate 3. The proposed location op ment target area, and r treat i ng p o l l u t i o n * 4 , Posses Ses a low potential fo nature in the area of the • the same gene for commercial tuber of businesses of al nat 4 • The nu l l be considered in determining the need ro osed projectect sha p revenue note financing. issue of not less than $300,000 5. The note shat l be for an ' within one year of preliminary approva 1. b Construction must begi AL F mom C. Application Processing Guideli 1. City financing of the project shall be limited t the issuance of a single9e mortgage revenue note, to be marketed as a private placement. 2. Final approval shall not be granted by the City Counc.i 1 until the project has received approval with respect to zoning, site design, b u i l d i n g design, or platting. 30 The applicant shall sign a memorandum of agreement providingdin that the99 y involvedwillpayallcosts i n the legal and fiscal review of the proposed project and all costs involved in the issuance of notes to finance the r J,', or. t . 4. The City reserves the right to deny any application for financing at any stage of the proceedings prior to adopting the resolution authorizing issuance of the note. 5. The applicant, at the time of the pbulic hearing, shall present schematics of their proposal to give the City Council reasonable notice as to the nature and sign of their proposed b u i l d i n g , 6. Briggs and Morgan are to be retained as Bond Counsel, 1 The purpose of the above data is to evaluate your proposal under City laws and polici You may refuse to provide this data. Refusal, however, may jeopardize approva of your application. The above information will be made p u b l i c to all who request it. t E 5 Action by Council: STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Endorse FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT DIVISION Modifie Rejecte Application for Approval of Date Industrial Development Bond Project Pursuant to Chapter 474 tPlease submit this form in duplicate - all supporting data in single copy only) Date: June 12 1985 The governing body of the City of Maplewood , County of Ramse Minnesota, hereby applies to the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development (Department) for approval of a proposed Industrial Development Bond issue as required by Minn. Stat. 474.01, subd. 7a. An allocation of issuance authority under Minn. Laws 1984, ch. 582 S 13.20 (to be codified as Minn. Stat. 474.16 474.24) for this proposed issue has 9, has not C.3, been received from the Department. If an allocation has been received, please show source: Entitlement M, Competitive Pool M We have entered into preliminary discussions with: Firm: W A V Inc . Address: 1740 Rice Street City: Maplewood Attorney: Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. 1100 International Centre Address: - 900 Second Avenue Scut -h State: MN City: Minneapolis State: MN NameofProject: Western Bank Office Building This firm is engaged primarily in (nature of business): ownership, impr and operati of real estate used by-Western State Bank of St. Paul and others. The proceeds from the sate of the Industrial Development Bonds will be used to (describe project): Construct and equip an approximately 24,700 square foot (gross) three- story commercial bank and office bui ldinq (plu basement) . Address of Project: 1740 Rice Street, Maplewood, Minnesota Proceeds from the sale of the bonds of approximately $ 2 .3 0 0.0 0 0 , will be applied toward payment of costs now estimated as follows: Acquisition of land: New construction: Demolition and site preparation: Acquisition of Equipment: Movable (limited to 10% of proceeds) Other Installation Fees: Architectural, engineering, inspection, fiscal, Legal. administration, or printing: Construction Interest: Initial Bond Reserve: Contingencies: Other: S 0- 0- 0- 0- 290,190 81,780 MOM 4.0 -- 0- 0— It is presently estimated that construction will begin on or about July 15 19 5 , and will be completed on or about March 15 • 1986 . When completed. there will be approxi- mately 60 ne lobs created by the project at an annual payroll of approximately $ 1 , 14 0 , 0 0 0 based upon currently prevailing wages. Of applicable) There are 9 exist Ing jobs provided by business. lf licable) There will be 50 jobs created b construction of the ro. t. Number of hours 64,268 app to y p jec ou s . Aver age wage level $ _12.0 0 per hou . The tentative term of the financing is 10 years, commencing _ December 1 19 8 5 The following exhibits are furnished with this application and are incorporated herein by reference: 1. An opinion of bond counsel that proposal constitutes a project under Minn. Stat. 474.02 and Minn. Laws 1984, chp. 582 § 12 (to be codified as Minn. Stat. 474.23). 2. A copy of the city council resolution giving preliminary approval for the issuance of its revenue bonds and stating that the project, except fora project under Minn. Stat. 474.02 subd. 1 f, would not be undertaken but for the availability of industrial Development Bond financing. 3. A comprehensive statement by the municipality indicating how the project satisfies the public or purpose and policies of Minn. Stat. ch. 474. 4. A letter of intent to purchase the bond issue or a letter confirming the feasibility of the project from a financial standpoint. 5. A statement signed by the principal representative of the issuing authority to the effect that upon entering into the revenue agreement, the information required by Minna Stat. 474.01, Subd. 8 will be submitted to the Department (not applicable to project under Minn. Stat. 474.02, subd. 1f). 6. A statement signed by the principal representative of the issuing authority that the project does not include any property to be sold or affixed to or consumed in the production of property for sale, and does not include any housing facility to be rented or used as a permanent residence. 7. A statement signed by the principal representatives of the issuing authority stating that the project: (1) does not include: an airplane; a private luxury box; a facility primarily used for gambling; or a store the principal business of which is the sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off premises; and (2) that no more than 10 percent of the proceeds of revenue bonds will be used to finance movable equipment not constituting a fixture, no more than 25 percent of revenue bonds will be used to finance the acquisition of land, and not more than $ 10,000,000 in revenue bonds which are industrial development bonds subject to the exemption described in section 103(b)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended December 31, 1983, will be issued with respect to any one building which is used for commercial, office or industrial purposes, with- out regard to ownership of condominium units within the building. 8. A statement signed by a representative of the issuing authority that a public hearing was conducted pursu- antto Minn. Stat. 474.01, Subd. 7b. The statement shall include the date, time and place of the meeting and certify that a draft copy of this application with all attachments was available for public inspection and that all interested parties were afforded an opportunity to express their views. 9. Copies of notices) as published which indicate the date(s) of publication and the newspapers) in which the notice(s) were published. 10. Provide a plan for compliance of employment preference of economically disadvantaged or unemployed indi- viduals. (See Minn. Stat. 474.01, Subd. 11.) We. the undersigned. are duly elected representatives of the City of Maplewood Minnesota and solicit your approval of this project at your earliest convenience so that we may carry it to a final conclusion. Signed by: (Principal Officers or Representatives of Issuing Authority; type or print official's name on the line to the left of the signature line. Thank you.) John C. Gre avu Mayor - chair Signature Lucille Aurelius Title C er Signature This approval shall not be deemed to be an approval by the Department or the State of the feasibility of the project or the terms of the revenue agreement to be executed or the bonds to be issued therefor. Authorized Signature Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development Please return to: Minnesota Dept. of Energy and Economic Development Business Financial Management 900 American Center Building 150 East Kellogg Blvd. St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Date of Approval RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVE1j0PMENT ACT AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT TO THE ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT WHEREAS, a) The purpose of Chapter 4 74 , Minnesota Statutes, known as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (the "Act ") as found and determined by the legislature is to promote the welfare of the State by the active attraction and encouragement and development of economi- cally sound industry and commerce to prevent so far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; b) Factors necessitating the active promotion and development of economically sound industry and commerce are the increasing concentration of population in the metropolitan areas and the rapidly rising increase in the amount and cost of governmental services required to meet the needs of the increased population and the need for development of land use which will provide an adequate tax base to finance these increased costs and access to employment opportunities for such population; c) The City Council of the City of Maplewood the "City ") has received from WAV Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the Company ") a proposal that the City assist in financing a Project hereinafter described, through the issuance of a Revenue Bond or Bonds or a ~Revenue Note or Notes hereinafter referred to in this resolution as "Revenue Bonds" pursuant to the Act; d) The City desires to facilitate the selec- tive development of the community, retain and improve the tax base and help to provide the range of services and employment opportunities required by the population; and the Project will assist the City in achieving those objectives* The Project will help to increase assessed valuation of the City and help maintain a positive relationship between assessed valuation and debt and enhance the image and reputation of the community; e) The Company is currently engaged in the business of ownership, improvement and operation of real estate used by Western State Bank of St. Paul and others. The Project to be financed by the Revenue Bonds is an approximately 24,700 square foot three -story commercial bank and office building located at 1740 Rice Street in Maplewood and leased to Western State Bank of St* Paul and consists of the construction of buildings and improvements thereon and the installation of equipment therein to be initially owned and operated by the Company, and will result in the employment of additional persons to work within the new facilities; f) The City has been advised by representa- tives of Company that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital cost of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the Project would be significantly reduced, but Company has also advised this Council that the Project would not be undertaken but for the availability of industrial bond financing; g) Pursuant to a resolution of the City Council adopted on June 24, 1985, a public hearing on the Project was held on July 8, 1985, after notice was published, and materials made available for public inspection at the City Hall, all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b at which public hearing all those appearing who so desired to speak were heard; h) No public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly benefit financially fran the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the - City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Council hereby gives preliminary approval to the proposal of Company that the City undertake the Project pursuant to the Minnesota Municipal Industrial. Development Act Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes) , consisting of the construction and equipping of an approximately 24,700 square foot three -story commercial bank and office building located at 1740 Rice Street within the City pursuant to Company's 2 specifications suitable for the operations described above to be initially owned and operated by the Company and pursuant to a revenue agreement between the City and Company upon such terms and conditions with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary, so as to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal of and interest on the Revenue Bonds in the maximum aggregate principal amount of 2,300,000 to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project; and said agreement may also provide for the entire interest of Company therein to be mortgaged to the. purchaser of the Revenue Bonds; and the City hereby undertakes preliminarily to issue its Revenue Bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions; 2. on the basis of information available to this Council it appears, and the Council hereby finds, that the Project constitutes properties, real and personal, used or useful in connection with one or more revenue producing enterprises engaged in any business within the meaning of Subdivision la of Section 474.02 of the Act; that the Project furthers the purposes stated in Section 474.01, Minnesota Statutes; that the Project would not be undertaken but for the availability of industrial bond financing; that the availability of the financing under the Act and willingness of the City to furnish such financing will be a substantial inducement to Company to undertake the Project, and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the development of economically sound industry and commerce, to assist in the prevention of the emergence of blighted and marginal land, to help prevent chronic unemployment, to help the City retain and improve the tax base and to provide the range of service and employment opportunities required by the population, to help prevent the movement of talented and educated persons out of the state and to areas within the State where their services may not be as effectively used, to promote more intensive development and use of land within the City and eventually to increase the tax base of the community; 3. The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by the City subject to the approval of the Project by the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority or such other state officer having authority to grant approval (the Authority ") , and subject to final approval by this Council, Company, and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the ulti- mate details of the financing of the Project; 3 4. In accordance with Subdivision 7a of Section 474.01 Minnesota Statutes, the Mayor of the City is hereby authorized and directed to submit the proposal for the Project to the Authority requesting its approval, and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide the Authority with such preliminary information as it may require; so . Company has agreed and it is' hereby determined that any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project whether or not the Project is carried to cc npletion and whether or not approved by the Authority will be paid by Company; b. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, is authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Project, to consult with the City Attorney, Company and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms and provisions of the Revenue Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary documents and to submit such documents to the Council for final approval; 7. Nothing in this resolution or in the documents pre- pared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose ,o The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or funds of the City except the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall the City be subject to any liability thereon. The holder of the Revenue Bonds shall never have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the outstanding principal on the Revenue Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City. The Revenue Bonds shall recite in substance that the Revenue Bonds, including interest thereon, is payable solely from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof* The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation; 8. In anticipation of the approval by the Authority the issuance of the Revenue Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Project, and in order that completion of the Project will not be unduly delayed when approved, Company is hereby 4 a r t authorized to make such expenditures and advances toward payment of that portion of the costs of the Project to be financed from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds as Company con - siders necessary, including the use of interim, short -term financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds if and when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the City; 9. If construction of the Project is not started within one year from the date hereof, this resolution shall thereafter have no force and effect and the preliminary approval herein granted is withdrawn. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood , Minnesota, this 8th day of July, 1985, Mayor Attest: City Clerk 5 t STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY C ITY OF MAPLEWOOD I. the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to a resolution giving preliminary approval to a co merc ial facilities development project. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this day of 1985. City Clerk SEAL) 6 R City's Letterhead] Mr. Richard Nadeau Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority 9 th Fl oo r American Center Building 150 East Kellogg Boulevard S t . Paul, Minnesota 55101 Re: City of Maplewood - $2,300,000 Commercial Development Revenue Note (Western Bank Office* Building Project) Dear Mr . Nadeau: Attached hereto in duplicate is the application of the City of Maplewood for approval of the above referenced project (the "Project ") including a copy of the PreliminaryY Resolution adopted by the City Council. As indicated in the attached Preliminary Resolution, we believe that this Project fully meets the public purpose requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 4.74. In particular, this Project will accomplish an expansion of the community's tax base by addition of facilities worth more than 2,300,000 and will provide our citizens with immediate access to greatly needed commercial bank and office facilities. Employment from the Project should result in up to 60 new employees* Finally, we believe that the Project will serve the interests of the canmunity by diversifying the commercial base and would help to dampen the severity of any general economic downt urns . Reference is made to the Preliminary Resolution for a more definitive statement of the public purposes served by the financing. The Project does not contain any property to be sold or affixed or consumed in the production of property for sale, and does not include any housing facility to be rented or used as a permanent residence. The Project does not include: an airplane, a private luxury box; a facility primarily used for g ambl ing ; or a store the principal business of which is the sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off premises; and no more than 10 percent of the proceeds of revenue bonds will be used to finance movable equipment not constituting a fixture, no more than 25 percent of revenue bonds will be used to finance the acquisition of land, and not more than 10,000,000 in revenue bonds which are industrial development bonds subject to the exemption described in Section 103 (b) (6 ) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended December 31, 1983 will be issued with respect to any one building which is used for commercial, office or industrial purposes, without regard to ownership of condominium units within the building., The City has complied with the notice and hearing requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, as amended, and agrees it will comply with the reporting requirements set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, Subdivision 80 The public hearing was held on July 8, 1985 at 7:00 P . M. , at the City Hall in Maplewood, and all interested parties were afforded an opportunity to express their views. The City will undertake to encourage that the employment opportunities made available by the Project will , if feasible, be offered to individuals who are unemployed or who are economically disadvantaged as contemplated in Laws of 1983, Chapter 289, Section 113. The City will comply with the reporting requirements set forth in said Section 113. We respectfully request prompt approval by the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority of the Project under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 4740 Very truly yours, CITY OF MAPLEWOO D By Its Mayor Briggs and Morgan Stationery] Richard Nadeau Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority 9th Floor American Center Building 150 East Kellogg Boulevard St . Paul, Minnesota 55101 Re: City of Maplewood - $2,300,000 Commercial Development Revenue Note (Western Bank Office Building Project) Dear Mr . Nadeau: This is to advise you that our firm has. reviewed the attached resolution, the feasibility letter of the application of the City of Maplewood and the letter of transmittal from the City. Based upon a review of that material it is our opinion that the Project referred to therein constitutes a project within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.02, Subdivision la and that the proposed financing thereof as set forth in the attached resolution is authorized by law. Please do not hesitate to give me a call if there are any questions. Very truly yours, Mary L. Ippel Enclosures Bank's Letterhead] 3 Honorable Mayor and City Council City Hall 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Re: Proposed Issuance of City of Maplewood - 2,300,000 Commercial Development Revenue Note Western Bank Office Building Project) Gentlemen: At the request of WAV Inc., we have conducted a study of the econarnic feasibility of the proposal that the City of Maplewood issue one or more of its revenue bonds under the provisions of the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act to provide funds for the acquisition and construction of a commercial bank and office facility located within the City of Maplewood, to be owned by WAV Inc.,, and leased to Western State Bank of Ste Paul. Our study has led us to the conclusion that on the basis of current financial conditions, the Project is economically feasible and the revenue bond(s) of the City can be successfully issued and sold. We understand a copy of this letter will be forwarded by the Maplewood City. Mayor to the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority of the State of Minnesota to serve as the letter of feasibility required by the Authority. Very truly yours, By Its i MEMORANDUM 1: 5. lotion by Coun ; 1: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNER PROJECT: DATE: City Manager Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner Endorse Design Review and Front Setback Variance Modified --- _. 550 E. Roselawn Avenue 3LeonRotering, Administrator Fair Oaks Lake Apartments DatA Maplewood Maple Manor Health Care Center Sunroom June 11, 1985 SUMMARY Request 1. Approval of a 7.5 -foot front setback variance. Code requiresthirtyfeet. The proposed addition would have a 22.5 -foot setback. 2. Approval of exterior building elevations for the ro osed 7.5 by 23 -foot sunroom addition. P P Proposal 1. The applicant is proposing to enclose the canopy which presently projects outwards toward Roselawn Avenue. There would be no further encroachment towards the street. 2. The.addition would primarily be glass enclosed, with brick around the new entrance doors, the easterly side and along the bottom two feet. 3. The front yard is already nicely landscaped. No additional plantings are proposed, or needed. Recommendatio 1. Approval of plan date - stamped 5 -22 -85 for the sunroom addition at Maplewood Maple Manor Health Care Center, subject to: a. The brick on the addition shall match the brick of the existing building. b. Approval of a front setback variance of 7.5 feet bythecitycouncil. 2. Adoption of the resolution on page 10, approving a front Y andsetbackvarianceof7.5 feet for Maplewood Maple Manor Health Care Center's sunroom addition, on the basis that: a. Strict enforcement of the code would cause undue hardship, since the building is already at the thirty-foot minimum setback line, and there is no other feasible place to construct the addition. b. The s p i r i t and intent of the ordinance would be met since the addition would not obstruct any sight lines due to the mature trees on this and adjacent lots. C. The addition is relatively small compared to the overall building. d. The canopy already extends into the setback. 2 BACKGROUND Site Description 10 Acreage: 2.05 acres 2. Existing land use: 2.05 acres, Maplewood Maple Manor Health Care Center Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Roselawn Avenue and Edgerton Elementary School Southerly, Easterly and Westerly: Single dwellings Past Actions 8-6-64: Council rezoned this property from F, farm residential to R -3, multipledwellingresidentialthenursinghome. 2- 15 -73: Council approved the construction of a 45 -space parking lot. 8 -6 -73: Council approved plans for expansion of the building, 10- 18 -79: Council approved a conditional use permit for the expansionion of 'P p the parkinglotintopropertyzonedF, farm residential, west of the original parkinglot. Approval was subject to the installation of landscaping, a decorative wood screening fence and parking lot lighting - -all of which have been installed. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 1. Land use plan designation: RH, high density residential 2. Zoninq: R -3 3. Code requirements: Section 36- 122(f) requires a minimum front Y andsetbackofanR -3B (17 or more units per building) multiple dwellin g shall be thirty feet, 4. Statutory requirements: Section 367.10 subdivision 6(2). State law requires that the f of lowi n findings be made before a variance can be granted: a. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. 3 b. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Undue hardship as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not. alter the essential character of the locality. mb Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Applicant's letter dated 5 -13 -85 5. Resolution 60 Plans date - stamped 5 -22 -85 4 qI 5 i o 2400 N. . Q LARK " L ! 77L E CANADA LAURIE RD WN K N R C 8 1 N J v ' EAVN FENTON N QN tTONKINGS Lo J m >- Hn c A r u r o 27 J h Q W d 1 L PA UL LOCATION MAP 5 Attachment One 0 f 112 G E F PKWY L L_ C Yeller Lake 4 N ICY Q.) SA !N T n6f 5 9 ( -t cv 88 ac AMENNE 7 539 O 8 !O d0 l 9tss5EVo Under Construction Tt B E L LW OO D - - — A V E. - 4-i fu F 43azs 9 ST. PAUL C PEA? o saiiiii ONE1War' s - _ I z 4 4 • s- tC • es; rC 54 &c. 1A 1 01 ro ! OTC 5 ee Z4 31 j7sc i 3Z ac a 9 10 (t + 6o s 4 J 41 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 6 Attachment Two 4 N c an a rte• 330')3 10 Elementary School t a3K g yew a /qt j 3 p O 4 Lij O 7 ex C- 6140 11 e 5 in N I 21. J O o O po O 3 75 715 7 5 5 7 5 7 5 7 5 QJ I AtL.L.r-%WN-'---J-- -AV-&.-AIL 13015 1±F" 42 7 'S.G 5F 8 0 r ey; 33 33 yo' 5,1855 I l t 3 IC 97 1905 O '`Maplewood d zac• Maplea Manor 1897 5 9 ( -t cv 88 ac AMENNE 7 539 O 8 !O d0 l 9tss5EVo Under Construction Tt B E L LW OO D - - — A V E. - 4-i fu F 43azs 9 ST. PAUL C PEA? o saiiiii ONE1War' s - _ I z 4 4 • s- tC • es; rC 54 &c. 1A 1 01 ro ! OTC 5 ee Z4 31 j7sc i 3Z ac a 9 10 (t + 6o s 4 J 41 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 6 Attachment Two 4 N S A t 1 SITE PLAN 7 Attachment Three 0--- N Maplewood Maple Manor Care Center Managed by Good Neighbor Care Centers, Inc. 550. East Roselawn Avenue St. Paul, MN 55117 (612) 774 -9765 TO: City of Maplewood FROM: Leon Rotering, Adm. DATE: 5/13/85 RE: Request Statement Maplewood Maple Manor Care Center is a nursing home licensed by the State of Minnesota for 159 beds. The North section was built in 1964 with 63 beds. The South section of two stories was added in 1969 with 96 beds. The original North section has a small dining room and a small day room, We are requesting to close in the porch with. a solarium -typestructurefortworeasons: 1. To enlarge the eating area for our 63 residents on this wing. Even with two shifts there is extreme crowding. 56 of 63 residents use wheelchairs which was not true when the building was originally con- structed. Wheelchair residents find it difficult to get through to their place at table and sometimes must wait until others are finished eating before they can return to their rooms. Also, 40 residents have to be fed by staff. There is such crowding that staff frequently stand while feeding residents because there is no room for a chair. 2. Secondly, this section of the building gives an institutional feeling to residents and families. By enlarging and adding a solarium we would not only expand the seating capacity but add light and a bright atmosphere as well. This will enhance the feeling of dignity for our residents. Further comments on the construction and use of the solarium: 1. We intend to use the additional space for the same purposes the building currently has, i.e., the care of nursing home residents. Therefore, there is no question of different zoning use. 2. There will be no detriment to public health, safety and welfare. The use of the addition will be the same as now. All disaster plans will be reviewed and practiced with no changes forseen. 8 Attachment Four Request Statement, pg. 2 3. The use is the same as now and so compatible with the zoning district. 4. The appearance and use of the addition should enhance property values. The building will look less institiutional. 5. The use of the addition will not disturb or be detrimental to any present and potential land use. There will be no additional noise, glare, odor, smoke, dust, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference, or other nuisances. 6. The use of the addition will make no change in traffic, parking or access to other area properties. It will not increase our resident, staff, or visitor populations. 7. Public services such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks are unaffected by the addition. Police and fire protection will be provided in the same way. B. No additional public facilities and services will be needed. It will not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 9. The addition will blend in with the sites natural and scenic appearance. 10. We see no adverse environmental effects. 9 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of , 1985 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Leon Rotering of Maplewood Maple Manor Health Care Center applied for a variance for the following- described property: Unplatted lands, the North 330 feet, of the East 300 feet of the West 475 feet of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4, subject to the avenue, Section 17, Township 29, Range 22, City of Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota. This property is also known as 550 E. Roselawn Avenue Maplewood; WHEREAS, Section 36-122(f) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires a thirty -foot front setback; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to reduce the front setback to 22.5 feet, requiring a variance of seven and one -half feet; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on May 22, 1985. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Community Design Review Board on June 25, 1985. The Board recommended to the city council that said variance be . 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on July 8, 1985 to consider this variance. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and Board, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. Strict enforcement of the code would cause undue hardship, since the building is already at the thirty -foot minimum setback line and there is no other feasible place to construct the addition. 2o The spirit and intent of the ordinance would be met since the addition would not obstruct any sight lines, due to the mature trees on this and adjacent lots. 10 Attachment Five 4 3. The addition is relatively small compared to the overall building. 4. The canopy already extends into the setback. Adopted this day of ,1985. Seconded by Ayes --- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MA PLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1985, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this variance. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1985. City Clerk City of Maplewood 11 MEMORANDUM F3 Action by Council:T0: City Manager FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson EndorseSUBJECT: Preliminary Plat and Rezoning F to R -1g ) ModifieLOCATION:Hlghwood Avenue and McKnight Road OWNER: George B r o- shears APPLICANT: Michial Mularoni and Associat es and George Ards earsDATE: J 13, 1985 SUMMARY Request 1. Approve a preliminary plat for eighteen single-dwelling9g lots. 2. Approve a rezoning from F, farm r_ eside •nce to R -1, single dwellingcitystaff), Proposal 1. Refer to the enclosed preliminary plat for the street and lotconfigurations. 2. Valley View Drive and the adjoiningoinin g ten lots would be developed asasecondaddition. Recommenda 1. Approve the Broshears preliminary plat, subject to: a. Entering into a development agreement with requiredqed suretyforthepublicimprovementspriortofinallatapproval. P PP This agreement shall include, but not be limited to, the followingrequirements: g Granting of an easement and construction of a temporar e ycul -de -sac at the east end of Valley View Drive if the construction of this street has not been secured in the Leonard's Oak Hills No. 5 Addition, 2) Removal of the silo, barbed wire fencin g and othermiscellaneousequipmentfromthformerfarmsteadpriorr toreleaseofthesurety.. b. Approval of a final grading, utility nd drainage 1ygplans. ThegradeandlocationofValleyViewDriveshallbeconsistenttwiththatproposedforValleyViewDriveinLeonard's Oak Hills No. 5Addition. c. The portion of the site to be platted as the second additionshallbedesignatedasOutlotAinthefirstaddition1patortheValleyViewDriveright -of -way must be dedicated as art offirstadditionplat, P the 210 Adopt the enclosed resolution .(page 8 ) , rezoning heg entiretire s i t efromF, farm residence to R -1, residence district sin le dwelling).9Atleastfourvotesinfavorarenecessaryforapproval, This rezoning is proposed to eliminate 'the possibility of anyfuturenuisancecomplaintsassociatedwiththeusesermittediPn afarmzone, such as the raising of livestock. 0' Site Description Gross area: 5.6 acres Net area: 4.7 acres BACKGROUND Existing land use: undeveloped, except f miscellaneousremnantsoftheform P or a silo and former farmstead, including barbed wire fencing, Surrounding Land Uses North: five single - dwellin home •g s that front on Phylis Court East: undeveloped property, proposed •5 Addition y P P ed f or the Leonard's Oak H i 11 s No .page 6 ) . South: Highwood Avenue. Across the street are two double and twosingledwellings. West: McKnight Road and single-dwellingg Past Actions s 1- 30 -81. An administrative lot division was approved toPp create the propertylabeledasthe "exception" shown on the proposed plot drawin sub'to conditions that have been met, g subject 4- 15 -82: Council approved the Leonard's Oak Hills lan ' plat f single P ned unit development andpreliminarypor26andfourdoubledwellingsforthesittabuttingtothesouth, subjectect to conditions e J itions. The PUD approval fordoubledwellingshasexpired. Four time extensions have been approvedforthepreliminaryplat. Planning 1. Land use plan designation: RL residentialteal low density 2. Zoning: F, farm residence 3. The proposed meets or exceeds all zoning subdivrequirements9nd Public Works City sewer and water are available. n%&I..--- 3.__ -- 1. Planning commission recommendation2. City council mb Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Man 4• .Preliminary Plat 3. Leonard's Oak Hills 5th Addition 5• Resolution (rezoning) 6. Preliminary Plat (separate h V V /LL 4GE OF R r NEWPOi4T LOCATION MAP ' a Attachment 1 4 N f -3 T I M BE R T `° 0 or- 0134JoaSi . 9 Q. o CLs) T 1 ° 2 ° 3 4 ( >ono 3 too Zo S44Z. 40 0o 6) . so so a7 • se s AJ i N 2 T3 a 5 6 Z Qo) ti - tom 11 ) <i P HYLIS 'G. COURT '; wAs w Vol Ilk e o 22 88 ' j ` (I !o) c1226472280r3 ?. 4 . s p y w , 4 22 2 r 7 Q 4 #voNw 2304 i S:: ::.:.,, fi L l0 5 ti :•:•: :•. ;.. tit. • {: ' . {::ti•. i:. . j } ::ti•:• 19 Proposed Leonard's Oak .. Hills #5 Addition t Uo ff ••i.; (0 0 vi 3 4 19.5 a;. •.R . /LAI K. z , I • 2 3 40 43 aj so .90 so H - W rj rimH -4 w LPN M w 40 40 re Cd 00ot ti.: ,• '': ::ire{•: y :•, ' :::ti: '•: 113 . t- r 2280 =82 .'2092 r •; r , - - 1 2270 ur1964 -66 tt;aJ ov oc oc:Ito i In Ia, Ifu J 1 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 5 Attachment 2 Q N 7 r it7 1.9 K eN + D ee_. 1 1 11 1 It b d o 4 1 d PR C-LIMINARY PLAT e I I I I I I LEONARD'S 0A H LLS MOm 5 lot s Bill LEONARD 2867 FOREST DALE ROAD NEW BRIGHTON MN $6112 r ----- see eee flit pill 1L1E1 y 1.e. n nOr1 1t11tMt t sum or tel N if" 11.0.1 rwlt/ • it till as%I1 tots 11 to" t tr th Wit 1110ef1 1.t will • U 1'111 --• — -- — 111111111011 to tits Re/111 (( matt me KaiI -- - -•—.— 1e• wta11111n 1111ot1 t•Illlit • 11 a 4.1 0 1 twin 11 • t . l.1. • - - - - -• tn1r1111 Igt11111t ter elm S 1 rwue ttl11t111 tin rloitt Kt AM 1.N " WWI tallow Mttt1 —eee xterwt K"Ill m Atoll / It.tt a to • - t 01!1.1 #1 win 1111/11" mile LRI "W"t 110110 flat wtr onoollI tWIM 1m vivo" mime ARM tRIl111t1 MttlMtt 11e109111 Will IM ere eee MAL itlt /Neor00 I" two M as ftwA•re w.11n IN ties of we owowm weee foods -W Iwo 1141 of W .erM•a•t q --- UN 1w tell d 11•tuN 111Irsem t.0.. 0.r _ tt•a•N4• tw••tr.61*t flit. am" wa..gr -omme fill. o4rsfome N 00 V641111111111 M The e>r4to to tg1.4pe. tte trrtmo 11.1 tow of w We wa."At to t//t •f 00 y.mm-M vowtN Ir 1i41 .r w f..tw0111.t w.v f• tits a e.t.m fit"Ow 111», wr. NI9 wwr1.M mr0 f1Mt. mum" Feuer 40•vt 1!1.1. w1. i •aaw4 to rt• two /$I dig onwNMwIr.•Nl A t la AIV. Ittt ovru. 1nw1 ••a• t.Nw•ta. fiw •wNtb" r tolls tt4a a.uw+. w,.N t•tr•r t1t4 area ear to :074 t hoe 1.r o p"011. row five 1.1.11 1..w to • eoeat rtr 1. /n.w two 1••ta of M• ••0.N fir r aaN fte .rear fw 4 /tl. raw taal 0•.14 tin IS • foot $4 w 4101"11 Iwo r o w Ittlraaae emem 4m 1/111M.lt lave 1..1. of 1.r 1/1aw of balmvla11. n..0. 11•at $40.14 toot N plwa M tweaN.1. 11•&}re to "am •etrr. l000 lu eee . t ' •. IICATI /N •A wf 7 , To t •r u•vw•I1N 11+r..• •.r OR wow r ,... «.... I t A l lC lt1 _ IP I I, Q.. •S e _... CL o o m Q.. r it7 1.9 K eN + D ee_. 1 1 11 1 It b d o 4 1 d PR C-LIMINARY PLAT e I I I I I I LEONARD'S 0A H LLS MOm 5 lot s Bill LEONARD 2867 FOREST DALE ROAD NEW BRIGHTON MN $6112 r ----- see eee flit pill 1L1E1 y 1.e. n nOr1 1t11tMt t sum or tel N if" 11.0.1 rwlt/ • it till as%I1 tots 11 to" t tr th Wit 1110ef1 1.t will • U 1'111 --• — -- — 111111111011 to tits Re/111 (( matt me KaiI -- - -•—.— 1e• wta11111n 1111ot1 t•Illlit • 11 a 4.1 0 1 twin 11 • t . l.1. • - - - - -• tn1r1111 Igt11111t ter elm S 1 rwue ttl11t111 tin rloitt Kt AM 1.N " WWI tallow Mttt1 —eee xterwt K"Ill m Atoll / It.tt a to • - t 01!1.1 #1 win 1111/11" mile LRI "W"t 110110 flat wtr onoollI tWIM 1m vivo" mime ARM tRIl111t1 MttlMtt 11e109111 Will IM ere eee MAL itlt /Neor00 I" two M as ftwA•re w.11n IN ties of we owowm weee foods -W Iwo 1141 of W .erM•a•t q --- UN 1w tell d 11•tuN 111Irsem t.0.. 0.r _ tt•a•N4• tw••tr.61*t flit. am" wa..gr -omme fill. o4rsfome N 00 V641111111111 M The e>r4to to tg1.4pe. tte trrtmo 11.1 tow of w We wa."At to t//t •f 00 y.mm-M vowtN Ir 1i41 .r w f..tw0111.t w.v f• tits a e.t.m fit"Ow 111», wr. NI9wwr1.M mr0 f1Mt. mum" Feuer 40•vt 1!1.1. w1. i •aaw4 to rt• two /$I dig onwNMwIr.•Nl A t la AIV. Ittt ovru. 1nw1 ••a• t.Nw•ta. fiw •wNtb" r tolls tt4a a.uw+. w,.N t•tr•r t1t4 area ear to :074 t hoe 1.r o p"011. row five 1.1.11 1..w to • eoeat rtr 1. /n.w two 1••ta of M• ••0.N fir r aaN fte .rear fw 4 /tl. raw taal 0•.14 tin IS • foot $4 w 4101"11 Iwo r o w Ittlraaae emem 4m 1/111M.lt lave 1..1. of 1.r 1/1aw of balmvla11. n..0. 11•at $40.14 toot N plwa M tweaN.1. 11•&}re to "am •etrr. l000 lu eee . t ' •. IICATI /N •A wf 7 , To t •r u•vw•I1N 11+r..• •.r OR wow r ,... «.... I t A l lC lt1 _ IP t I i I I t • I i A,•.uJ M..ewd •• 4019 00 2 534 7 DiVALLEYVIEWDRIVE ' J ' sc . fit, 'f • •+ -... -- •! oe:I g= I I 2 3 4 5 all fAv 7P7 o• d d ip • Joe .' re ' A • L e 5 Z 6 _. Uu t i r v 7 oat son,** t ry • a e R Cr o r•t ro HIGHWOOD _ AYE Nu f , ; PRELIMINARY PLAT BROSHEARS ADDITION 7 Attachment Four 4 N Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting f thecitycounciloftheCityofMaplewoodMinn g held in the council Maplewood, was duly called andncilchambersinsaidcityonthedayof1985at7p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning rom Fg , farmresidencetoR -1, residence district (single dwelling) for thefollowing- described property: The Southwest quarter of the Southwest uarter of the Noq r thwetquarterofSection13, Township 28, Range 22, except the east 197.00 t th Pfeetthereof, also except e South 168.00 feet of the West 175.00feetthereof . WHEREAS the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the .City of Maplewood, uYP , p rsuanttoChapter36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances, 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood PlanningCommissiononJune17, 1985. The laplanning commission recommended tothecitycouncilthatsaidrezoningbe 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearin g on1985toconsiderthisrezoning. Notice thereof was ublisp h ed andmailedpursuanttolaw. All persons present at said hearing weregivenanopportunitytobeheardandpresentwrittenstatements. Thecouncilalsoconsideredreportsandrecommendationsofthecitystaffandplanningcommission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL thattheabove-described rezoning be approved on the basis of th e followingfindingsoffact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spiritandintentofthezoningcode. P ur pose 2. The proposed change will not substantial) injureneighboring y 7 e or detractfromtheuseofneigngpropertyorfromthecharacteroftheneighborhood, and that the use of the ro ert adjacentacPPy ent to the areaincludedintheproposedchangeor1anisadequatelytelPqysafeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests andconveniencesofthecommunity, where applicable and the ubl cwelfare.p 8 Attachment 5 4 . The on public proposed change would have no negative effect upon thelogical, efficient, and economical extension of services p icesfacilities, such as public water, P and P , sewers, police and fire protectionandschools. Adopted this day of , 198 5 . Seconded by Ayes STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerkoftheCityofMaplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the da y of1985withtheoriginalonfileinmyoffice, and the same is a fulltrueandcompletetranscripttherefrominsofarasthesamerelatestothisrezoning. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate sea 'P 1 of the citythisdayof , 19850 City Clerk City of Maplewood* 9 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: DATE City Manager Thomas Ekstrand-- Associate Planner Code Amendment -- Parking City of Maplewood June 25, 1985 SUMMARY Request Aotion by Council: Endorse Modif i O Rej eote gate Amendment of the general parking requirements for commercial and multiple dwelling. Reasons for the Request 1. The parking requirements in the CO, commercial office districtrequire25% more parking than any other commercial district. 29 Council asked staff to determine if the number of arkinp g spacesforretailusesmaybeinadequate, because of roblems with Sou nd ofMusiconBeamAvenue, P 3. Our parking stall size requirements are overly restrictive.y estrictive. 4. Curbing requirements are required b policy, but 'ordinance, y P Y• not included in Comments 10 Office Parking: The study on office parking came about from a request foror a zonechangefromCOtoLBC, limited business commercial for the proposed office site between NCR and Mr. Steak on Sloan Place.This proposed two -story office building ould not providegpovide enoughparkingunderCOregulations,* but could under LBC requirements,q nts. Based on the survey results on page 10, the most widel y used parking formula for offices is one space required for each 2q 00 square feet of floor area. Planners in these surveyed cities works well.find that this formula y The 1:200 square -foot formula is the same as requirement except that Maplewood has a less one space for each 300 square feet) for upp no reason why upper floor floor office space parking than office space on the main floor. floor area requirement should be eliminated. MaplewooddIs current restrictive formula er floors. There is should need less This separate upper 2. Retail Parking: The retail parking requirements are being reviewed because of the Sound of Music store's need for additional parking space. Sound of Music is exceeding Maplewood's parking requirements by two spaces, but their parking is inadequate. The examples below are to help evaluate if other stores in Maplewood are experiencing the same problem. Comments based on Store Spaces Spaces Provided Observation Sound of Music 31 33 (1 :188 sq. ft.) insufficient parking Hirshf ields 117 140 (1:167 sq. ft.) always excess parking Maplewood Square 228 235 (1:193 sq.ft.) enough parking Other than the Sound of Music, there has not been any problem with Maplewood's current retail parking requirement. The code should not be changed. Requiring increased parking for all retail uses would create an excess of parking for future stores and shopping centers and be an unnecessary cost of development. 30 Parking Stall Dimensions: Maplewood has no uniform parking stall size requirments. Staff is proposing that parking stalls be permitted to be nine feet wide, which is the most accepted standard today, based on the survey results on page Sixty -five percent of these cities permitted this width space The only problem with reducing the parking space width to nine feet is that door nicks could potentially increase. Although this is a disadvantage, nine -foot spaces are still very adequate and safe. Eighteen -foot deep spaces, when abutting a curb, sidewalk or landscaped area, would suffice, since cars typically overhang beyond the space one to two feet. Even the larger vehicles, like the 18.5 -foot long Chevrolet Kingswood Estate Wagon (see page 4 }, would only need a parking space 16.5 to 17.5 feet deep. The aisle widths staff has proposed for the various angles of parking space arrangement were derived from a parking study prepared by the engineering firm of Bar ton- Aschman . A letter of support from the Joseph Company is enclosed on page 15. 4e Curbing: Staff is also proposing to formalize in ordinance, our current policy of requiring continuous concrete curbing around parking lots. This requirement is important because: 2 a. Concrete curbin holds up longer. Bituminous and timber curbs are susceptible to amage by snowplows and are generally much shorter lived, theref ore , there is much less of a maintenance problem with concrete. F b. Continuous curbing is important to contain and direct storm water run -off and also serves as a wheel stop to protect landscaping. i The park and recreation commission recommends that city rks bYp e exempt from the curbing requirement (see enclosed minutes and memo from the director of community services, pages 17 and 18 Th e community design review board recommended. against exempting parksbecauseitwouldallowadoublestandard. The staff recommends a compromise -- requiring curbing only in parks with parking lots that are used in the winter. Curbing gets most of its abuse in winter from snow plows. Recommendation Approval of the attached code amendment regarding minimum parkingrequirements. (Recommendations of the community design reviewYg board are included, except for the curbing requirement for parks.) 3 BACKGROUND Past Action 11- 28 -83: Council amended the off - street parking regulations in a multiple - dwelling district (Section 36 -109) to read: "Minimum parking stall size shall be ten (10) feet by twenty (20) feet, except that parking stalls for owner- occupied units may be reduced to nine (9) by eighteen 18) feet." Sample of Car Dimensions Make Dimensions (width /length in feet) VW Bug 5 x 13.5 Mercury Linx 5.5 x 14 VW Rabbit .pickup 5 x 14.5 Dodge Aries 595 x 14.5 Oldsmobile Omega 5.5 x 14 .5 Ford F 100 ( full size pickup)6.5 x 16.5 Ford van 695 x 17 Chevrolet Caprice 6.5 x 1795 Ford Torino 6.5 x 17.5 Chevrolet Kingswood Estate Wagon 6.5 x 18.5 Surveys Four surveys are a 1. Office parking requirement is one 2. Retail parking one space for each feet, ttached and their results are summarized as follows: requirements- -the most frequently applied parking space for each 200 square feet of floor area, rquirements- -the most commonly applied formulas are 150 square feet and one space for each 200 square 3. Parking space dimensions- -the most often required parking stall dimension is a nine by twenty -foot space. 40. Of the 28 cities surveyed, fourteen cities required concrete curbing in their park parking lots; ten do not; three do not require, but encourage it; and one city installs concrete curbing only along the portion of parking lot that fronts on the right -of -way. Drnr j=AIIrn 1. Recommendation by the community design review board 2. First reading by the city council 3. Second reading and hearing by the city council mb Attachments: 1. Ordinance amendment 2. Office parking survey 3. Retail parking survey 4. Parking space dimension survey 5. Curbing Survey (park parking lots) 6. Survey- manufacturing and warehouse parking 7. Letter: Joseph Co. 8. Memo: Curbing 9. Parks Commission minutes 10. CDRB minutes n ORDINANCE N0, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 36 -22 is amended as follows (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out) : Section 36 -22. Off - street parking. a -Net a f e --Qf Q. The following types of uses shall provide additional off- street parking space, as indicated,unless otherwise authorized by the city council. A11 w parking spaces shall have proper access from a street or alley and shall be located on or near the lot on which such use is situated: 1) Single- family dwelling: Two (2) spaces, as provided above. 2) Multiple dwelling: Two (2) spaces* for each housekeepingunit. One of these spaces must be enclosed. 3) Hotel or tourist cabin court: One space for each rental room or suite. 4) Restaurant, cafe or tea room: One space for each fifty 50) square feet of floor space devoted to patron use 5) Theater, auditorium, church or other place of public assemblage: A minimum of one space for every four (4) seats, Schools must have a minimum of one space for every twenty (20) auditorium seats. 6) Commercial office or recreational building use, other than those specified above f e One space for each two hundred (200) square feet, or portion thereof, of - -Od- —e-r- floor area-1. jalls an ) S c-.a area,, emeess. to 7) Shopping centers having enclosed, nonleasable common areas: one _ for each two hundred ( 200) square feet, or portion heeof, , of leasable floor area* 8) Manufacturing and warehouse establishments: One space for each two (2) employees - , or one space for each 400 square feet of manufacturing space and on _space for eac 1,000 square feet of warehouse spac whichever is greate Off- street parking facilities existing at the effective date of this paragraph (,Tune 22, 1972) shall not subsequently be reduced to an amount less than that required under this paragraph for a similar new building or use, Off street parking facilities provided to comply with the provis of this paragraph shall not subsequently be Attachment 1 5 reduced below the requirements of this paragraph • imm r-syrAW_W- • •r- 'm As •'!•. :+7r :i UAIP 41r4ft JIP • • • I • • • • a 'I • • • • 9) . Motor Fuel Stations: Four .(4) spaces, pl us three (3 ) additional spaces for each service stall. If there is a convenience store or restaurant associated with the fuel station, additional arkin shall be provided in accordance with this section • b) _ Each _ parking space shall be not less than nine feet wide and nineteen feet in length (measured 12arallel with the stri i-n exclusive of '``` -- lines 'access aisles. _ f a parking space abuts a curb, sidewalk or landscaped area, the len th of the sp may be reduced to eighteen feet • c} _ All _spaces_ shall be served b access aisles of the followin Widths, based on the angle of the parking stalls: Parking Angle Aisle Width 90 degree _ 24 feet ( two -way traffic) 60 degree 19 feet (one -way traffic) 45 degree 6 feet one -way traffic) d) All parking lo have continuous concrete curbin surroundin the exterior perimeter of the lot and drives. Park parking lots, that are not used in the winter, and parking lots avin twelve s aces or less are exempt from this requirement unless required by the city engineer for drainage control, W. e) All parking lots shall be continually and properlmaintained • Section 2. Section 36 -140 (g -j) of the CO, commercial office district, regulations are amended as follows (deletions are crossed out) : dWV I • •• • • • r w 1 • w w i w • w • • I w w w • • • • • • • w = ` • w • E-h-}-Lighting: All lighting shall be designed and located so as to confine directL rays to the premises. Lighting standards shall not exceed a height of fifteen (15) feet, Lighting standards and fixtures shall be of a design and of materials that are compatible with the architecture and the landscape architecture of the site. h) Uses confined to structure: All uses shall, unless otherwise specified, be contained entirely within a completely enclosed structure. Parking facilities are exempted from this requirement.. (Ord. No. 380, s 104, 1- 16 -75; Ord, No. 529, s 4, 11- 22 -82) Section 3. Section 36 -172 (7) , (8) and (9) of the SC, shopping center district regulations are amended as follows (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out) : 7) Parking, loading or service areas used by motor vehicles shall be located entirely within the lot lines of the shopping center, shall be physically separated from public streets and shall have no more than two (2) accessways to any one public street. All accessways shall be located at least one hundred 100) feet from the intersection of any street lines. The city council may prescribe more restrictive conditions or any further reasonable conditions deemed appropriate with respect to the suitability of the shopping center in the neighborhood. (Code 1965, s 908.020; Ord, No. 529, s 8, 11- 22 --82) Section 4. Sections 36 -156 and 36 -157 of the fuel station ordinance shall be amended as follows (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out) : 7 Section 36 -156. Motor fuel stations -- Generally. All automobile garages, motor fuel stations and other businesses providing fuel or service for motor vehicles shall be classified according to the classes set forth in Section 367 -151 of this division and shall be placed upon a site having the area and treatment as provided in Section 36 -151 and Sections 36 -15:7- 8 through 36 -161 of this division. (Ord. No. 232, § 4 .(§907. , 030) , 10 -19 -67 ) Im f _ _ - C C - - - - - - - -A / -A ml n i inu - - - _ - F _ Q - - F1 Is m %_ - P ..I.an • • • • _ • • • 1 • _ _ _ ta- a & Z; _ • • _ _ s4axg • • e • • _ • • • • - _ • A shall exee • nttt 1 _ • • _ _ • • ma _ t tr . 1 O • Q a • • • • _ -- autmidGi A • • _ • • • _ • • _one r, r, r, r • Section 5. Section 36 -109 of the multiple - dwelling district parking regulations shall be amended as follows (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out) : Section 36 -109. Same -- Off - street parking. Each multiple - dwelling unit in the city have off - street parking space. Parking spaces shall be in addition to, and not part of, the driveways or maneuvering space necessary to the parking areas serving such multiple dwelling. All parking spaces, driveways and other parts of the parking facilities shall be dust free and shall be surfaced with concrete or blacktop. Rtzou i ror3 mar : , ; i= ; marking requirements shall be as follows: t w--4- er r = f==1 I = f Q Y e ;- a-- 0 An open parking stall shall be a minimum distance of fifteen feet from a dwelling unit window and five (5) feet from any side or rear property line. sze ^r ro 2) Parking stalls may not ' bee located w thin f i f teen feet of a a o,^ u n i t s e t ba % eLS f . = A. % e , fi street righter --of -way, unless Section 36 -27 applies. i N • • . _ 9 , // a E. UT K • • • • UP v • M . o • • • • • 3) {-6-} Where a garage or carport opens to a public street, the width of the driveway onto that public street shall not exceed twenty -four (24) feet in width, and in no event shall a series of garages open directly to that street. Where a series of garages face each other on a private road, the minimum width separating garages shall be thirty (30) feet in order to provide visibility in backing out or turning around. (Code 1965, 6 906.070; Ord, No. 231, 1 10 -5 -67; Ord. No. 245, 9 4 ( §906.030), 10 -3 -68; Ord. No. 555, § 2 11- 28 -83) 4) Parking shall also be in accordance with section 36 -22. Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Council this day of , 1985. Mayor Attest: Ayes- - City Clerk Nays -- SURVEY OFFICE PARKING REQUIREMENTS Spaces Per Square Foot) Maplewood--1:200 ( first floor) plus 1:300 ( upper floors)--in most districts. 1:150 in CO districts Coon Rapids - -1:300 Roseville- -1:200 Burnsville- -1:150 for buildings under 6 000 square feeq t 1:200 for buildings over 6 square feet Plymouth - -1:200 Brooklyn Center -- 1:200 Fridley- -1:250 Blaine - -1:200 Crystal - -3 spaces plus 1:200 New Brighton- -1:200 New Hope - -3 spaces plus 1:200 Golden Valley- -1:250 White Bear Lake - -3 spaces P lus 1200 Apple Valley - -1:150 for the first 6,000 square feet 1:200 if over 6,000 square feet South St. Paul- -1:300 Eagan - -1 :150 Maple Grove - -1:250 Columbia Heights--1:200 for the first 6,000 square feet 1:250 if over 6,000 square feet Cottage Grove - -1:200 West St. Paul- -1:150 for the first 6,000 square feet 1:200 if over 6 square feet North St. Paul 1:150 Oakdale - -6 :1000 (1:167) for the first 20,000 square feet Newport - -1:200 Vadnais Heights -- 6:1000 (1 :167) for the first 20 square feet 1:200 if over 20,000 square feet St. Paul- -1:200 Attachment Two SURVEY RETAIL PARKING REQUIREMENTS Spaces Per Square Foot) Maplewood -- 1:200 (first floor) and 1:300 additional floors) Burnsville - -1:150 Roseville- -1:200 Coon Rapids - -1 :200 Plymouth - -1:200 Brooklyn Center- -1:125 Fridley- -1:150 Crystal--1:140 New Brighton - -1:200 New Hope - -1:150 Golden Valley - -1 :150 White Bear Lake - -1:200 Apple Valley - -1 :150 South St. Paul -- 1:100 Eagan - -1:150 Maple Grove - -1:200 Columbia Heights - -1 :200 Cottage Grove -- 1:150 Shoreview--5.5:1000 (1:182) Oakdale- -1:200 Woodbury- -1 :185 Newport -- 1:150 (plus one for each employee) Vadnais Heights - -1:200 St. Paul- -1:150 Blaine -- Attachment Three PARKING SPACE DIMENSION SURVEY 8 -30 -83 Attachment Four 12 Stall Dimensions when Parking Stall abutting curb,sidewalk City Dimensions or landscaped area Aisle Width Coon Rapids 9 x 18 9 x 16 24 Eagan 10 x 20 10 x 18 24 Brooklyn Center 8 "x 1995 8' 8 "x 18 24 Vadnais Heights 9 x 18 9 x 16 24 St. Paul 9 x 18 9 x 16 20 8 x 16 compact) Burnsville 9 x 18 no change 24 Plymouth 9 x 18.5 of 26 Fridley 10 x 20 if 25Blaine9x20if 24 Crystal 9.5 x 20 it 24 New Brighton 9 x 20 if 22 New Hope 10 x 20 It 24 Golden Valley 9 x 20 if No specified White Bear Lake 8.5 x 20 requirement 24 Apple Valley 10 x 20 24 South St. Paul 9 x 20 20 Roseville 9 x 18 24 Columbia Heigh 9 x 20 22 Cottage Grove 9 x 20 No specified requirementShoreview9x2024 No. St. Paul 9 x 20 No spec if i ed requirementOakdale9x20 Woodbury 9 x 20 24 Newport 10 x 20 No specif ied requirement Attachment Four 12 CONCRETE CURBING IN PARK PARKING LOTS No Concrete Requires Concrete Curbing Requirement Curb 1. Maplewood 2. Coon Rapids 3. Roseville 4. Burnsville 5. Plymouth 6. Brooklyn Center 7. Fridley 8. Blaine 9. Crystal 10. New Brighton 11. New Hope 12. Golden Valley 13. White Bear Lake 14. Apple Valley 15. South St. Paul 16. Eagan 17. Maple Grove 18. Columbia Heights 19. Cottage Grove 20. West St. Paul 21. Shoreview 22. North St. Paul 23. Oakdale 24. Woodbury 25. Newport 26. Little Canada 27. Vadnais Heights 28. St. Paul 29. Ramsey County x only curb along portion that fronts on r.o.w) x x (does encourgage it) x x x x (does encourage it) x x x x x x x x x x x (asphalt optional) x x x x x x x x x (concrete p r e f e r r e d but not required) x (does encourage it) Attachment 5 13 SURVEY MANUFACTURING AND WAREHOUSE PARKING 5 -30 -85 1. Maplewood 2. Coon Rapids 3. Roseville 4. Burnsville 59 Plymouth 6. Fridley 7. Blaine r,anu=acturing Warehousing 1/2 employees 1/2 employees 1 /each employee on the 1 /each employee on largest shift the largest shift 2/3 employees or 1/1,000 .1/2,000 sq. ft. sq. ft. whichever is greater 1 /each employee on largest shift plus one for each company 1/300 sq. ft. 1/40 sq. ft. 1/2 employees or 1/200 sq, ft., whichever is greater 8. Golden Valley 1 /500 sq. ft. 9. White Bear Lake 1/350 sq, ft. plus 1 /each company vehicle 10. Apple Valley 4 spaces plus 1/800 sq. ft. 11. So. St. Paul 12. Eagan 13. Maple Grove 14. Columbia Heights 1/400 sq. ft. or 1/4 employees, whichever is greater 1/800 sq. ft. 1/350 sq. ft. plus one for each company vehicle 4 plus 1/400 sq. ft. 15. Cottage Grove 4 plus 1/400 sq. ft. 16. Shoreview 1/2,000 sq. ft. Spaces per number of employees 1 /each employee on largest shift plus one for each company 1/2 sq. ft. 1/2,000 sq. ft. 1/2,000 sq. ft. or 1/2 employees, whichever is greater 1/2,000 sq. ft. 111,000 sq. ft, plus one for each employ- ee on the largest shift. 1/400 sq. ft. (under 6,000 sq. ft.) 1/800 sq. ft. (over 6,000 sq. ft.) 1/800 sq. ft. or 1/4 employees, whichever is greater 1/800 sq, ft. 1/2,000 sq. ft. plus one for each company vehicle. 1/400 sq. ft. (under 6,000 sq. ft.) l/ 1,000 sq, ft. (over 6,000 sq. ft. 1/400 sq. ft. (under 6,000 sq, ft,) l/ 2,000 sq. ft. (over 6,000 sq. ft. 1,2000 sq. ft. JOSEPH COMPANY I'£AI701tYDE\vPEUt 5001 NORTH UNIVERSITY STREET / PEORIA, ILLINOIS 61614 I TELEPHONE 3091692 -1135 June 18, 1985 Mr. Geoff Olsen Planning Director City of Maplewood 1902 E, County Road "B" Maplewood MN 55109 Re: Parking Stall Size Dear Mr. Olsen: Discussions with Tom Ekstrand of your office has prompted us to write you. Our development of well over one million squarefeetofcommercialpropertiesacrosstheMidwesthastaught us valuable guidelines with respect to parking requirements, A recent study by the U . S . Dept. of Transportation indicates that, by 1990, the percent of automobiles in the U . S . that are compact will be between 70 and 80 percent. When more than one out of two vehicles parked in a shopping center or other development is a compact, it is appropriate to consider special accommodation of these vehicles, Our experience has found most stall width requirements to be 8.5 to 9 ft., recognizing that with the growing proportion of small vehicles, it is increasingly less likely that two large vehicles will park adjacent to one another; thus space for opening doors (which governs the required distance between adjacently parked vehicles) and stall width can be reduced. Rearrangement of surface parking area to accommodate the advent of today's car sizes also allows. more landscape areas. The tra- ditional "sea of asphalt" can be made more attractive with the use of landscape islands. The islands are made available by downs i zing. the area required by the cars, UNIVERSITY SQUARE PEORIA FON DULAC PLAZA EAST PEORIA BARTONVILLE SQUARE BARTONVILLE 1 C Mr . Geoff Olsen June 18, 1985 Page two We have attempted to illustrate our experiences which have offered the best solutions to parking development for every- one concerned. If we can assist any further, please call. Best regards, wt&" Monte J. Brannan AIA Corporate Architect MJB : Hkb 16 v wmnRANm im Too Park and Recreation Commission From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Community Services Subj: Cement Parking Curbs Required Around All Parkin g Lots Date: June 12, 1985 An amendment to the minimum parking. requirements of the City's Ordinance includes the following: "(d) All parking lots shall have continuous concrete curbing surrounding the exterior perimeter of the lot and drive. Parks and parking lots having twelve spaces or less are exempt from t h i s requirement unless required by the City Engineer for drainage control." In the previous sentence, the words "Parks and" were struck out by the Design Review Board. It was their feeling that parks should be treated as any other business, etc. in the City and have to construct concrete curbing. Part of their reason- ing for going to concrete curbing was due to the abuse that asphalt curb has taken during the winter when plows have chipped out the asphalt and it has not been repaired in the Spring. I do not have any real objection to the installation of concrete curbing around parking lots in the parks, however I do feel that the Park and Recrea- tion Commission and myself should have the right to decide what type of curb - ing would be most attractive in each park. Attractiveness is always in the eye of the beholder ". While we do have some parking facilities that are cleaned in the winter at skating rink locations, there are many parking lots that are not cleaned in the winter and therefore the excuse about hitting with snowplows does not apply. I would submit that there are other means of control besides cement curbs for our parks: 1) Timbers laid flat on the parking surface or used for a timber wall. 2) Curb wheel blocks. 3) Timbers or metal posts inserted similar to fence posts and where needed planking attached to the timbers. 4) Fencing such as chainlink, woven wire, wood, decorative fence, metal plate guardrails. 5) Simple chain or cable. 6) Berms which can be either dirt or rock with attractive landscaping planted in them. 7) A slight swale. 8) Plantings such as shrubs, trees, hedges, vines. 9) Proper striping where the lot is basically used in the summer. 10) Large stones or boulders. 11) Brick walls or brick flower planters. Parks are like people - each one is an individual and should be planned and developed to its greatest potential. It is my recommendation that the Plan- ning Commission be advised that the parking facilities in the Maplewood parks not be limited to concrete curbs around parking facilities. 17 Attachment 8 MC'Mr)D n nine ins To: Geoff Olson, Director of Community Development } From: Robert D. Qdegard, Director of Community Services.'\ Subj: Cement Curbs Around Parking Lots Date: June 24, 1985 The following motion was made after considerable discussion at the regularParkandRecreationCommissionmeetingonJune17, 1985: Commissioner Christianson MOVED to recommend to the City Council to reinstate the words "Parks and" in the proposed amendment to the City Ordinance struck out by the Community Design Review Board and leave the matter of drainage con - trol and aesthetics to the City Engineer and Park Board; SECOND by Commissioner Schneider; AYES: Commissioners Brenner, Chegwyn, Qualley, Christianson, Piletich and Schneider; NAYES: Commissioner Zappa; Motion Passed, Attachment 9 18 If construction has not begun within two years of approval oard reviewshaberepeated. 8. Site secu lighting shall be provided arm sah11 be directed or shielded so not to cause an ndue glare onto adja properties or roadways. 9. The landscape plan sha be r ised for staff approval providing for: a. Evergreen shrubbe shall rovided in the areas indicated on the buildingelevationsheets. b. Sod sha be provided in all grass area north and northwest of the propose wilding, and also around the perime of the entire building.All er disturbed areas shall be sod*or seed. B_9A1"d` Member Peterson seconded Ayes--all N Be Parking Ordinance Amendme Secretary Ekstrand said that Gary Jackson from Maplewoodewoo 'P d Ma11 is present atthemeetingtolistentodiscussionregardingtheparkinordinanceandam nge dme n t. Board Member Juker said she is opposed to the ro ospp ed 9 - foot wide stalls, The board discussed the number of parkin spaces requiigPequired for schoolauditoriumstoriumsandsuggestedstaffsurveythercommunities •Y es rega rd ng theirrrequirements. The board agreed that any parkin lot eitherg in a park orbyacommercialbuilding, should be requiredred to haveve the continuous concretecurbing. They eliminated reducing the parking 's 'g p g tall size for employeesto8112feet.They suggested addin to them •g manufacturing and warehouse parkingrequirementstoinclude1spacefor400squarefeetofmanufacturinaceforeach1guseand1space , 000 square feet of warehous space or ones ace oftoeeswhi ' P eachtwoemRYchever. i s greater. - Al so section (i) shoul.d:.be (h), Board Member Rossbach moved the board recommend approval of the proposedamendmenttotheparkingrequirementsasamendedbteboardasfollows. 1. Section 36 -22 (a) (8) add after "Ones ace foriPo each two (Z) Employees "or space for each 400 square feet of manufacturing se an1000swarg d 1 space for eachqefeetofwarehousingspace, whichever is 'greater " 2. Eliminate from Section 36 -22 (b) Parkin 'employees may be reduced to *-a minimum width " Parking spaces desg -Hated foronlyof81/2 feet. " 3. Eliminate from Section 36 -22 d "Park sand. " 4. Section 36 - 140 ' should be changed to " "g (h) Board Member Peterson seconded Ayes- -Board Members Peterson, Rossbach Deans Nays - -Board Member Juke r TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: err Aotion by Council: MEMORANDUM Endorse Hod if i e City Manager Rejeete Assistant City Engineer Data McClelland Street Water Main -- Project No. 84 -04, Assessment Hearing July 1, 1985 An assessment hearing has been scheduled for July 8, 1985 at 7:30 p.m.for the above -named project. All properties proposed for assessment have been notified. The project has been substantially completed and approximately 90% of the project costs have been incurred. The remaining costs have been estimated and a final project cost determined, The cost of $63 , 700.00 is approximately 13% above the engineer's estimate from the fesibilit Y report. This cost overrun of $7,300.00 is directly attributed to wet and rainy conditions encountered prior to paving which caused the existing base materials to become saturated and needed to be removed and replaced prior to paving operations. At the public hearing for this project, the city council ordered city participation in the cost sharing of this project. This cost was to be determined by assuming the city's share as one -third (1/3) of the water main installation cost up to a maximum when the remaining two - thirds (2/3) of the installation cost, which is to be assessed against the benefited properties, reaches $35.00 per front foot. This calculates to a city share of $15,603.00. The following table shows project costs compared to that estimated in the feasibility study: Description Services Water Main City Partic, Actual Assmt. Assmt. Cost Units Rate 8,325 39,772 15,603 63,700 Feasibility Feasibility Cost Rate 9 Ea. $925.00/Ea. $ 8,420 $842.00/Ea. 884.6 FF 44.96/FF 32,377 36.31/FF 15,603 - 56 , 400 Attached are a project map denoting the properties proposed for the assessment, the project mailing l i s t , and the proposed front-footage assessment for each parcel. In addition to the front - footage assessment, parcels 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 received water services to the property l i n e and are proposed to be assessed $925.00 each. NEW 6 WATER MAIN a 7 " , 9 EA* I ' WATER SERVICES Nt4Ef4.5 AIL K E- 0 r OWN TR N K - -U `._ _ L -- IINVA 00 • 0 •1O Tislas . t . ` ` 3 r h i • f 6 z ,•. -. ul WINNOW, let 8 N-NNMNW- `% 3 f lk 3 3, 5 r iALJmowZ T3 44- OWN —.... am Q ONO Gung 0, o . W 6 Coo IrAc 4 4aftwo—MON-1Gas w 1.04 0 V , + , r- 1 ^ 45 .2 die 2 ,s, 1 1 •,• • 43 15 t t fglwmt14 % ; r 4•a' to 1 1 > 10 .+ _ JO ? 7 dl Ok r , EXISTING IN - PLACE" KA rk i IN I i 1 1 771 IS I&L 6 it • ° 1n IIN s1 1 IK 1 . Assessment Map Mc Clelland St. Watermain Improvement 84 -4 Q7/8/85 i _ IMPROVEMENT 84 -4 MC CLELLAND STREET WATER MAIN OFFICIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING MAILING LIST Mailed June 7,1985 IF • ?- 75 - 21 -0'3 M N 8 jRgMJ7671Ei 32 - 2 EDWARD L DONATH ET AL GR EGCIRY , °c MEHSIKOMER- E 2600 HUDSON RD.FARI E E MEWS IKOMER ST PAUL M•IN 55119 219 MCCLELLAND AVE ST MN - 55109 1 JR § J7675JO-30-03M JR 75 - 40 -0 2 84PN D ENNIS D E DIANE M JOHNSON ERVIN L KNUTSON 204 MCCLELLAND 209 FCCLELLAND AVE ST PAUL MINN 55119 ST PAUL MN 55119 z . .8 JR ,, J7-67r- , E i50-03N I 17- 75 - 50 -02 A Mrt.N . 8 HUMB ERTO C GONZALEZ SHERRY L SGDERLUND E - JULI ET D GONZALEZ 201 NCCLEL LAND AVE 196 FCCLELLAND AVE +ST PAULA MN 55119 ST PAUL MINN 55119 t 9 jRtMT7175S i60-03 - ,DSAM 5 7- 75C0- EO - N 46 EDWARD D E HELEN C HIL LY ER KE ITF S E PA F-ELA J KEa ER 184 FCCLELLAND AVE 195 FCCLELLAND AVE ST PAUL rN 55119 {ST PAUL MAN 55119 jpgMJ775gi70-03 7- 175C0- 071 -D2 464M .NO. 5 CUANE -E MOSER ET AL'DAVID L ARNOLD ET AL 176 MC CLELLAND ST 2579 BRODKVIEW DR ST PAUL MI NN 55119 ST PAUL MN - - 5119 t jR 7- 175 C- 021 -02gM .N 484 jytM -t BRIAN D E LORT A MC NAMARA MONAMMAEDREZA MEVRALIAN 221 VC CLELLAND AVE ST PAUL MN 55119 2710 OAKLAND AVE S #5 MPLS MINN 55407 City of MAPLEWOOD Department of Public Works ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Rhant / of PROPERTY DESCRIPTION TOTAL AS SESSMEN ono moo 0ose RESOLUTION ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the city council has met and heard and passed upon all objections . to the proposed assessment for the construction of the McClelland Street Water Main as described in the files of the city clerk as Project Number 84 -04 , and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 20 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January, 1986, and shall bear interest at the rate of ten (10) percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1985. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3* It is hereby declared to be the intention of the council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made., upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 4. To the extent that this improvement benefits non - abutting properties which may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 429.051, to reimburse the city by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements, 5. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. F4W 6 Request 1. Amend the plan as shown on page 8 of this report.2. Amend the zoning map as shown on page 10 of this report, Reason for the Request S This area is part of the city -wide rezoning program initiated by thecity. The purpose of this program is to eliminate inconsistencies between the land use plan and zoning ordinance, where the zoningallowsamoreintensiveuseofthepropertythanproposedon the land use plan. The land use plan is the long- range guide for development.The zoning defines the current development rights. If there is a conflict between the two, the zoning applies. Therefore , it is important to restrict the zoning of property that is P lanned for a less intensive.use. Comments This area has developed with an interspering of commercial industrialandresidentialuses. The recommended chan es attemg pt to balance thehighestandbestuseofthesepropertieswiththatofsurroundingproperties, in a manner consistent with the city's developmentpolicies. p Recommendation (at least four votes in favor are required for approval) 1. Approval of the enclosed resolution (page 15) amending the land nd use plan, as shown on page 8 to: a. Add a BW, business warehouse designation at the southwest corner of County Road C and Highway 61 and amend the frontage of Mr. Dunn's property (south of 1122 and 1116 County Road C) from RM, residential medium density to BW, on the basis that: Aotion by Coura33: MEMORANDUM ErLdorse TO :City Manager odif led. . FROM:Director of Community DevelyP Rejecte S BU JECT.Plan Amendments and Rezonings Date LOCATION:West of Highway 61, Between County Road C and Highway 36 APPLICANT:City of Maplewood OWNERS:William Dunn, Lester Deets, Chester Herringer, Maplewood Industrial Park, Richard Peltier, Alfred Zuercher, Libo Napoli, Northernaire Motel (Francis Trudell), Eugene Lund, William Bedell,Corrine Pine S Real Estate, H and L Investment Company, Jack Ambler, Richard Hermanson, Lillian Falk and R. K. Pillsbury DATE:June 11, 1985 4 SUMMARY Request 1. Amend the plan as shown on page 8 of this report.2. Amend the zoning map as shown on page 10 of this report, Reason for the Request S This area is part of the city -wide rezoning program initiated by thecity. The purpose of this program is to eliminate inconsistencies between the land use plan and zoning ordinance, where the zoningallowsamoreintensiveuseofthepropertythanproposedonthe land use plan. The land use plan is the long- range guide for development.The zoning defines the current development rights. If there is a conflict between the two, the zoning applies. Therefore , it is important to restrict the zoning of property that is P lanned for a less intensive.use. Comments This area has developed with an interspering of commercial industrialandresidentialuses. The recommended chan es attemg pt to balance thehighestandbestuseofthesepropertieswiththatofsurroundingproperties, in a manner consistent with the city's developmentpolicies. p Recommendation (at least four votes in favor are required for approval) 1. Approval of the enclosed resolution (page 15) amending the landnd use plan, as shown on page 8 to: a. Add a BW, business warehouse designation at the southwest corner of County Road C and Highway 61 and amend the frontage of Mr. Dunn's property (south of 1122 and 1116 County Road C) from RM, residential medium density to BW, on the basis that: 1) This area has been zoned for M -1 use since the 1950's. 2) This area has excellent visibility and access for commercial use. 3) The proximity to Highway 61 makes this area undesirable for residential use. b. Amend the area south of the Town and Country mobile home park from RM, LSC, limited business commercial and RL, residential low .density to BW on the basis that: 1) This area is better .suited to commercial uses than to residential uses due to its proximity to Highway 36 and Highway 61 and the existing commercial development 2) The BW designation would recognize the long standing M- 1 zoning in the area. 3) There is a need to assemble a large area of commonly planned acreage to encourage the development of an internal road system. An internal road system is necessary to efficiently use these properties. 4) A more intensive commercial designation would allow a zoning that may not be compatible with planned or existing residential uses to the west. 2 . Approve the resolution on page 17, rezoning as shown on the map on page 10 as follows: a. Amending the west half of the drive -in property, 1055 Gervais Avenue and 1041 Gervais Avenue from BC, business commercial and F to M -1, on the basis that: 1) It would be consistent with the proposed BW designation on the land use plan. 2) To develop the F zoned land residentially would require a cul -de -sac from Demont Avenue that would exceed the 1,000 foot limit in city code. 3) The F zoned property is owned by the same owner as the drive -in property to the south and can be more easily developed commercially with that site. 4) The drive -in property has been zoned and used commercially for many years. b. Amending the mobile home park from M -1, R -1 (single dwelling residential) and F (farm residence) to R -3 (multiple dwelling) , on the basis that an R -3 zone best reflects the current and planned use for the property. In addition to the reasons cited above, each rezoning is also recommended for approval on the basis of the four findings required by code, 2 BACKGROUND Study Area Description 10 Area: about 95 acres 2. Existing land uses: Town and Country Adult Community mobile home park., Maple Leaf Drive -in Theater, Northernaire Motel, Swenson's Carriage House, Midwest Mobile Home Supply, Hermanson's Dental Lab, Twin City Vending, Maplewood Industrial Park, Zuercher's Well Drilling and residence, three single dwellings and undeveloped land Surrounding Land Uses North: County Road C, six single dwelling properties, Cypress Street and Kohlman Lake city park East: Highway 61 and its frontage road South: Highway 36 frontage road (Keller Parkway) West:. single - dwelling lots and two large undeveloped parcels, planned for single dwelling use Past Actions 9- 23 -58: A rezoning from F, farm residence to BC, business commercial was approved for the Maple Leaf Drive-in Theater property. 12-4-69: Council approved a special use permit to allow the Town and Country mobile home park to expand to 155 units. 5 -17 -79 and 6- 21 -79: Council ordered a project which included the construction of Forest Street from County Road C to Keller Parkway, as a condition of the Carsgrove's Meadows plat approval. Two, eight acre -foot storm water ponds were also approved - -one to the west of Forest Street's planned intersection with Keller. Parkway and a second to the west and south of the mobile home park. ( See page 10.) Approval for the improvements outside of the Carsgrove's Meadows subdivision has expired because a developer's agreement was not entered into. 5- 23 -83: Council approved a variance for Zuercher Well Drilling (2483 Highway 61) to erect a metal pole building in an M -1 zone, 3 -4 -85: The planning commission recommended approval of a plan amendment to create a BW, business warehouse designation for the area northwest of Highway 61 and County Road C. ( See page 8.) Council action is pending, 3 Planni ng 1. Policy criteria from the plan: a. Page 18 -2: Zoning maps should be updated, as necessary, to make both the land use maps and zoning maps compatible b- o Page 18 -5: Renewal, replacement and redevelopment of substandard and /or incompatible development shall be accomplished through public action and private means (e.g. amending the plan for the Maple Leaf Drive -in Theater property), c. Page 18 -5: Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses shall be accomplished in an orderly fashion which does not create a negative impact on adjoining developments. d. Page 18 -5: Whenever possible, changes in types of land use shall occur along rear property lines so that similar uses front on the same street . e. The LSC, limited service commercial classification refers to commercial facilities on a neighborhood scale. Heavy industrial uses, department stores, motels, auto accessory stores, etc, would be prohibited, while other land uses of a medium intensity nature would be permitted subject to meeting certain performance standards. f. The BW, business warehouse classification is designed for uses including governmental and public utility buildings and structures, storage and warehousing facilities, wholesale business and office establishments, cartage and express facilities, radio and television stations and other industrial uses of a lower - intensity nature. g. The RM and RH designations are for multiple dwellings. The RH designation allows up to 34 people per net acre. The RM designation allows up to 22 people per net acre. The units per net acre varies by type of unit and bedroom mix. As an example, the maximum density for a two - bedroom town house project would be ten units per net acre for RH and seven units per net acre for RM . 2. The existing density of the mobile home park is about 26 people per acre. The permit for the park would allow a density of 33 people per acre. 3. Compliance with land use laws: a. Section 36 -485 requires four findings for approval of rezonings. Refer to the resolution on page 17 b. Refer to page 11 for the uses permitted in the M -1 zoning district 4 c. Section 36 -187 -(b) requires approval of a conditional use J permit to construct, alter or conduct an M-01 use, except parking,P P 9,within 200 feet of a residential district. d. The existing single dwellings and the Town and Countrymobilehomeparkwouldremainnonconforminguseswiththe recommended changes. A nonconforming use is a use that is not permitted by the existing zoning, but was permitted before theP existing zoning was approved. Such use may continue, but may not expand without city approval. Public Works 10 An eight acre -foot storm water pond will eventually be requiredtothewestandsouthoftheTownandCountrymobilehomepark. Refertothemaponpage10 . 2. , There is right turn only access to Highway 61 from east of the mobile home park. Signals are not proposed. 30 The street system in-this area should be planned to discouragethetrafficgeneratedbytheM -1 uses from traveling through the nearby residential neighborhood. Minnesota Department of Transportation In 1967, MN /DOT acquired a right -of -way easement over the property or an interchange south of Count Road Y y C, between Highway 61 and the west frontage road. The interchange will not be constructed. The majorityYoftheeasementareaaccordingtoaMN /DOT official, "may be available for reconveyance to the underlying fee property owner." Direct access to Highway 61 will not be permitted. Citizen Comments Each of the affected property owners and the property owners within 350 feet of the study area were asked their opinion of revisin g the land use plan, as shown on page 12 . Of the 33 persons contacted 16 responses were received - -nine were in favor, five were opposed and two had no comment. Procedure 1. Plan amendments: a. Planning commission recommendation following a publichearing b. City council decision c. Metropolitan council review for consistency with metro- politan policies and plans 29 Rezonings: a. Planning commission recommendation b. City council decision following a public hearing 5 jC Attachments 10 Kohlman Lake Neighborhood Land Use Plan (existing) 20 Kohlman Lake Neighborhood Land Use Plan (proposed) 3. Property Line /Zoning Map (existing) 4. Property Line /Zoning Map (proposed) 59 M -1 zoning district 6. Land use plan amendment proposal sent out for citizen comment 70 Maple Leaf Drive -in redevelopment proposal 8, Resolution (plan amendment) 90 Resolution (rezoning) 6 dnais Height interchan principal arterial R L RI V_- T R, 3 BW R1. LITTLIE CANADA o. ori it - - - Ad L A K E R I 4 M or collect minor artei i __LW je R Cj CD E. Ke ego R M, residential medium densitERH, residential hi densit BW, business warehouse arterial ii, !rcnan 00II ACCOOMMMI ETA r Area to be amended Kohlman Lake Revised: 12-16-83 NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN existin Attachment one 4 1 Vadneie Heights County Rd. 0 — 7 i 1 r C to U r. J o 0 y 0 a E Keg t HIQhway 36rr- f I KOHLMAN LAKE NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN Areas Proposed for change (PROPOSED) 8 Attachment two Lilt fl ; it At. C T-i RL, residential low density RM, residential medium density RH, residential high density 6W, business warehouse major c t eretls 4 Now r ror r minor team Ave. trtrta i q J r C to U r. J o 0 y 0 a E Keg t HIQhway 36rr- f I KOHLMAN LAKE NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN Areas Proposed for change (PROPOSED) 8 Attachment two Lilt fl ; it At. C T-i RL, residential low density RM, residential medium density RH, residential high density 6W, business warehouse major c t eretls 4 Now Im MIN 0.00,Itia ;j t I it law sea* t M1 01) 415 W OM ARILL JIM 111111111F 4W too mr ArwRcow 4Z- 111111410 IVI Aas a tog to 4C 4r* DEMON AVie LASIrmoZ. (4 7497p4 : 3 2463,sit Q 41aNis11W1 Ad 7ENgods am Jim- OIL t "A 0 -V- W %: 44 area Meadow FA VFramV.M a W William amiss IV Lobos ILI a IT Val Ldw JIMro t ti mol Key R-1, single dwelling F. farm residence BC, business comemroial M-1, light manufacturing ZONING MAP AREA TO BE REZONED Existing) 9 Attachment GOUIN ROA Miam aul M 100112 , rr ,•miltril) Q' Ci ark ell India Add- 7r. • few r4IL R I83ftt n' end. dr sea 1v IPAl.'1 cove, I !' \ KI {;.• '•... _ (10 •'- 1 4. 1 h 64 in 4 Ile,1 1 ' • ,: : Imo. •r C r•' 952 N , 1 ,..:.,: .,,: :>;•.•.•.•.:•.•:.•.. .:_.•;.; ` . s +.. , V V ` 11 • i : O -4 E • IL ::•. 'l. , ` t. no • r' • r >l.IS• CONNO +.. . K C Q' , • • s _ , s ,r • ,• , .; . '' t 1 s 'f 1• , • • • c, 40 is 771 Mi e 401 : DEAAONT3 2 AvE eV ti ;;,;;,; ;,,;;; ,•;;; Maplewood Office /Industrial Park; ta{ s = (II i IY "AS t a• •t.s : ;•,• ... . • }; :.. . _— — . __JUL J • •''at tat 04 Car 1 y :.;:• ,•,•,ti• . 1 .ma t :Id. 1 • , .w ';:;i • ' +: :.•:.J': 1 , same* f,•,: , J.•.. ::: 1w man man, u • j - / {: 4 tea• • ( ,• N 1 Mme •,.,., ••• Zuercher Well Drilling r. 3 ' 6 ROOKS .Y r' :- :•: }, :•`• ioe 1 to t! !r• ,,, :ti•.••' : ;; ' I.. {... .''`K;:tr: :r:::': ::•X. go alL. . •S!C •:fit• - r• rn "f Drive —In Theater ' - Its J . a .,I 1. ' {Yr,: )•.'.'.'.'.': /,':..•.,• ...:..{•.;' ' rah _ — L•+]latL ., 1_ -- •,,• • ':} ;.'• ''.:' •. ....... tisfra — t .r. .• V. f• 400 Northerna i re Motel • 41 O tip::• •'' :•.::•:::• : t•::•::;•; :, aw r •t 240 L • ;.;: .:•.•.;. !!t. i!rr•'•;: t w O' :N ::fir;;:; I . C f 99dw sit Future Pond , _ f 4 dam W, a& two a. M s wo Pit04bi1101I • crow /L ." Key R -3, multiple d w e l l i n g M -1 light manufacturing ZONING MAP Area Proposed for Change (Proposed) 10 Attachment four 4 N DIFISION 9. U•3 LIGHT UAWFACnwNG DISYRICT bee. 186. Permittedrmited uses. t The following uses are permitted In the Y-1 District provided that, mo use . bimb--1s noxious or hazardous shall be permitted. , a) Any use listed as a permitted use in a BC business and Commercial District, if the property is not designated for LSC Limited Service Coss - nercial or RU Residential Medium density use an the city's camprebensive plan. b) Wholesale business establishments. ; c) Custom shop for maldag articles or products sold ae:- tbf premises. d) Plumbing, beating, air conditicning, glazing, paintimi— paper- banging, roofing, ventilating and electrical contractors, blickamitb shop, carpentry, soldering or welding abop. e) Printer • s abop. . - f ) Place of aarusemmt, recreation or assembly. g) Bottling establishment. b) Uanufacturing, asaenbly or processing of: I) Canvas and canvas products. ' II) Clothing and other textile products. III) II ectri cal equipment, applicances and supplies, except beavyelectricalmachinery. TV) Food products, except meat, poultry or fish. V) Jewelry, clocks or - watches. VI) Leather products. - VII) Medical, dental or drafting equipment, optical goods. VIII) 3tu.91 cal - instruments. OX) Perfumes, pharmaceutical products, rubber products and synthetictreatedfabrics. x) S=11 products from the following previously prepared materials: CoA feathers, felt, fur, glass, ?lair, born, paper, plastics ortshells. to ) Sport1mg moods. XII) Tool, dye and pattern ma Y3 ng, or s iad lar =all machine abops . xIII) flood products. . S) Carpet and rug cleaning. t Laundry, dry cleaning or 4ye ing plant. W Laboratory r.eaearcb, experimental -or test1mg. 1) offices a) Scbool n ) Wa rebouse - o) Accessory use on the -sask' lot wi and custoa i1,7 incidemial to a17 of the aboY t permitted uses, including an apartrrnt for security purposes. Code 1965, 1 wq. 010; ord. wo. 395, d 1, 5-13 -76; Ord. Ho. 556, 1 1, 22 -12-83) Ser. 36 -187. Ccmdi t caul uses. L • t • ?be fo O -Ong uses are permitted in an 3-1 Districttrict subs a quest to aypro"I of a ccmditionsl use permit: 1) hoed car. lot. 2) Yard for the wt.orage, sale or distribution of ice, coal, fuel oil, bull ding ma to ri al s or similar materials . Junk, salvage or wrec king yards shall not be allowed. ..: 3) AM use listed as a permitted use in a BC Buziness Capercial District, if the property is designated for LSC L1laited Service Co=wrcial or RV Residential medium density use on the city's ecaprebmal se plan. 4) Any use of the same ebb racter as a permitted use in Section 36 -186. s) Trucking yard or terudnal. 1 1 r. CZ Os r— V i GERVAIS LA ICE B t _ -. tom i• Kohim*a*n "' Lake NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN Prop9sal sent out for citizen comment) R1 0 to t M a co e _ 13 mi or artui done JRdoll— Lp 1'• . t. o v •- L. w . _._ E Cr -- N inierchan E rincipal arterialp do AM R s V _ 3 1 . - BW R-Iwo• o A 1 j i y db minof artert a M 13 p r i f •1 CZ Os r— V i GERVAIS LA ICE B t _ -. tom i• Kohim*a*n "' Lake NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN Prop9sal sent out for citizen comment) R1 0 to t M a co e _ 13 mi or artui done JRdoll— Lp 1'• . t. o v •- L. w . _._ E Cr -- N a QQnsulting . Planners One Groveland Terrace (612)377-3536 M* ofis— Minnesota 55403 Dahlgren, Shardiow, and Uban /Incorporated MEMORANDUM left DATE: 7 March 1985 TO: Randy Johnson, City of Maplewood FROM: C. John Uban, ASLA RE: Mapleleaf Theatre Property We have studied the Mapleleaf Theatre property and surrounding area to determine for Jerry Herringer the land use potential for the property. 1. Today the area is a conglomerate of varied uses organized along a single located frontage road. The quality is very mixed, and the opportunity for good quality uses to fill in the voids is quiteop minimal, 2. The transitions of uses between residential and industrial is nonexistent. The -prime residential areas lie westerly of Cypress Street. Any residential east of Cypress will have to absorb the impact of changing land uses. . 3. The owriership pattern in the area severely limits the potential for significant redevelopment. An HRA or the City directly, through a redevelopment district, needs to consolidate land for new development. Rather than promoting strip development along the frontage road, an interior road system serving a new business park formed from the theatre property and others along the highway would promote the most rational and desired development. 4. The theatre property should be zoned to M1, Light Industrial, to match adjacent. properties and assist in unifying the land uses in the area. To form a transitional use between the industrial (M1), the trailer i court, and the westerly R -1, a portion of the Herringer land should be rezoned to R -3 using Cypress Street as access to County road Co 5. The M1 Zoning District should be restructured to allow the new office /warehouse uses being used in the emerging high -tech parks. Flexibility with good design creates a most successful dd'velopment. 6. We believe the theatre property, along with others, has an excellent potential of redeveloping into a quality business park. We strongly urge the City to consider public involvement in assembling and constructing public roads. 13 Attachment seven 2*1 s i • cam' c AV . 13 oo dk S L i 1 i ft 2 '' js CZ •t RO NT-Y -----R O 1n s •t ! •! 1 ft1 tis , t o 0 F r . A t •. t urJ_ rr it s qu ? r Ole a 1 .. _CIO, Of •. 2*1 s i • cam' c AV . 13 oo dk S L i 1 i ft 2 '' js CZ •t ex A1 . • `. s 3 z 101* SIP" dab tat • R . •' :J F , ft .. t r / •I C ,,. • — 1a -.0 te. do d1b n • l \ f r r I Jr AV E I.'!j 7a.4i A. 2 1 k3 w ... • i,. o .r' o _' .r 1^ 9 ` 1.SO ar-02 0 ± r a3 w — s t 15 . _ 0 3 oose 3 ,«7c 75. t iK. Is V •'••( Ct ., b s f . 13 t 1 .4 1 p a r •• 741 l : •tGT. (It It ac BROOKS • . M 1.s.,) ,z o60 • ± l o 17 .j 1 22° 21 '. 20e . 1s Q14w / rR r • •w • n t r Ap1t .` taF T TsOt •tIIFW l ate # 4M d r 167 &C) P w ) - N-9 L:.J N— • 8 1 - tom^ • 710> - • w OL t Is Abo_ 4w t s +• •; Z t r 1 2Ln. r ' ! •9 r•. ti f •' ' r• r f sl.c • r0 r 1 is v LSD c • -' • 7 O ir 14 /- 0 j i NT-Y -----R O 1n o F r . A t •. t 0.' • ? Ab& di/.&A tae. Ole 1 .. _CIO, 5tiac cIt3.91 `. ' •' Iry r ofto ' F e i Oa0 ex A1 . • `. s 3 z 101* SIP" dab tat • R . •' :J F , ft .. t r / •I C ,,. • — 1a -.0 te. do d1b n • l \ f r r I Jr AV E I.'!j 7a.4i A. 2 1 k3 w ... • i,. o .r' o _' .r 1^ 9 ` 1.SO ar-02 0 ± r a3 w — s t 15 . _ 0 3 oose 3 ,«7c 75. t iK. Is V •'••( Ct ., b s f . 13 t 1 .4 1 p a r •• 741 l : •tGT. (It It ac BROOKS • . M 1.s.,) ,z o60 • ± l o 17 .j 1 22° 21 '. 20e . 1s Q14w / rR r • •w • n t r Ap1t .` taF T TsOt •tIIFW l ate # 4M d r 167 &C) P w ) - N-9 L:.J N— • 8 1 - tom^ • 710> - • w OL t Is Abo_ 4w t s +• •; Z t r 1 2Ln. r ' ! •9 r•. ti f •' ' r• r f sl.c • r0 r 1 is v LSD c • -' • 7 O ir 14 /- 0 j i PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. This amendment was initiated by the City of Maplewood as part of its city -wide rezoning program. 2. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on dune 17, 1985 to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and ' present written statements. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said plan amendment be r 3. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on 1985, The council considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the following plan amendments be approved: 1. Add a BW, business warehouse designation at the southwest corner of County Road C and Highway 61, and amend the frontage of Mr. Dunn' s property ( south of 1122 and 1116 County Road C) from RM, residential medium density to BW, on the basis that: a. This area has been zoned for M -1, light manufacturing use since the 1950's b. This area has excellent visibility and access for commercial use. c. The proximity to Highway 61 makes this area undesirable for residential use. 2 . Amend the area south of the Town and Country mobile home park from RM, LSC, limited service commercial and RL, residential low density to BW, on the basis that: a. This area is better suited to commercial uses than to residential uses due to its proximity to Highway 36 and Highway 61 and the existing commercial development. b. The BW designation would recognize the long standing M- 1 zoning in the area, c. There is a need to assemble a large area of commonly planned acreage to encourage the development of an internal road system. An internal road system is necessary to efficiently use these properties. 15 Attachment eight e. A more intensive commercial designation would allow a zoning that may not be compatible with planned or existing residential uses to the west. Adopted this day of , 1985. Seconded by Ayes -- 16 b Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of 198 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 10 These rezonings were initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on , 1985. The planning commission recommended to the city counci 1 that said rezoning be 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 1985 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the following rezonings be approved: 1. From F, farm residence and BC, business commercial to M -1, light manufacturing for the following described property: a. The North 396 feet of that part of the East 1/2 of the SE 1/4 and NW 1/4 east of Peter's Addition also a triangular tract adjacent on the north being in and measuring 66 feet on the East line of the East 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 all in Section 9, Township 29, Range 22 b. Subject to Gervais Avenue and except the East 240 feet of the South 290.4 feet, the South 924 feet of the East 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22 This property is also known as the Maple Leaf Drive -in Theater c. Subject to Bedell Road ( Gervais Avenue) the East 150 feet of the South 290.4 feet of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22 17 Attachment nine This property is also known as 1055 Gervais Avenue d . Subject to County Road B2 and Bedell Road (Gerva i s Avenue) , the west 90 feet of the East 240 feet of the South 290.4 feet of the NW 1/4 , of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22 This property is also known as 1041 Gervais Avenue The specific reasons for approval are: a. It would be consistent with the proposed BW designation on the land use plan. b. To develop the F zoned land residentially would require a cul -de -sac from Demont Avenue that would exceed the 1,000 foot limit in the city code. c . The F zoned property is owned by the same owner as the drive -in property to the south and can more easily be developed commercially with that site. d. The drive -in property has been zoned and used commercially for many years. 2. From M -1, R -1 .(single dwelling residential) and F (farm residence) to R. -3 (multiple dwelling) for the following described property: Subject to widened Highway 61 and except the Easterly 90 feet of the Northerly 150 feet of that part westerly of said highway, the following part of Lot 6 southerly of a line running from a point on the West line of and 85.7 feet from the Southwest corner of said lot to a point on the East line of and 19.7 feet south of the Northeast corner of the South 66. feet of said Lot 6 and all of Lot 5, W. H. Howard's Garden Lots and Except the North 550 feet of the East 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 northerly of a line running from the Southwest corner of said East 1/4 to a point on the East line of and 66 feet from the Southeast corner thereof in Section 9, Township 29, Range 22. The specific reason for approval is that an R -3 zone best reflects the current and planned use for this property. In addition to the specific reasons cited above, each rezoning is approved on the basis that: 10 The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose intentntent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded, 18 6 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 3. T proposed 9Theroosedchap a will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient,and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Adopted this day of , 19 8 5 . Seconded by Ayes- - STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of 1985 with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this rezoning. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1985. City Clerk City of Maplewood. 11 n Request 1. Amend the city's land use plan from RL, residential low densitytoBW, business warehouse and RM, residential medium density as shown on page 7. 20 Amend the zoning map from R -1, single family residential9y teal and BC,business commercial to M -1, light manufacturing and R -2, double dwelling as shown on page 9. Comments The court has ordered the city to approve this plan amendment and aconsistentrezoning. The council's previous action to rezone art ofthissitefromBCbusiness p • commercial to R -1 and denial of a petitionbyHillcrestDevelopmentforaplanamendmenthavebeenvoidedby the court after Hillcrest Development brought a suit against the c,it Y- Recommendation (at least four votes are required for approval) 1. Approve the enclosed resolution amending the land use lan from RL, residential low density ty to BW, business warehouse and RM,residential medium density as shown on page 7, based on the districtcourt's order. 2* Amend the zoning map from R -1, single family residential and BY C,business commercial to M -1, light manufacturing and R-2 double dwelling as shown on page 9. In addition to the required i red f i nd i n s inq9code, these rezonings are approved on the basis that: a. The previous rezoning to R -1 was voided by district court. bo Rezonings, compatible with the plan amendments are requiredqbythecourtandstatelaw. c. The proposed zonings are the most compatible with the courtorderedplanamendments. 7 Aotion by Council: MEMORANDUM Endorse Jtodifie TO:City Manager Rejecte - FROM:Director of Community Development Data---- - SUBJECT:Plan Amendments and Rezonings LOCATION:Highway 36, City Limits and Cope Avenue APPLICANT:Hillcrest Development and City of Maplewood OWNERS:Hillcrest Development, Charles Humphrey and James and Gudrun Pomush DATE:June 13, 1985 Request 1. Amend the city's land use plan from RL, residential low densitytoBW, business warehouse and RM, residential medium density as shown on page 7. 20 Amend the zoning map from R -1, single family residential9yteal and BC,business commercial to M -1, light manufacturing and R -2, double dwelling as shown on page 9. Comments The court has ordered the city to approve this plan amendment and aconsistentrezoning. The council's previous action to rezone art ofthissitefromBCbusiness p • commercial to R -1 and denial of a petitionbyHillcrestDevelopmentforaplanamendmenthavebeenvoidedbythe court after Hillcrest Development brought a suit against the c,it Y- Recommendation (at least four votes are required for approval) 1. Approve the enclosed resolution amending the land use lan from RL, residential low densityty to BW, business warehouse and RM,residential medium density as shown on page 7, based on the districtcourt's order. 2* Amend the zoning map from R -1, single family residential and BY C,business commercial to M -1, light manufacturing and R-2 double dwelling as shown on page 9. In addition to the requiredired f i nd i n s inq9code, these rezonings are approved on the basis that: a. The previous rezoning to R -1 was voided by district court. bo Rezonings, compatible with the plan amendments are requiredqbythecourtandstatelaw. c. The proposed zonings are the most compatible with the courtorderedplanamendments. I I BACKGROUND Site Description Acreage: 9.5 Existing land. use: a city water tower and undeveloped land Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Castle Drive and Highway 36 Easterly: single dwellings and undeveloped land.in North St. Paul, planned and zoned for single dwellings Southerly: single dwellings and undeveloped land, planned and zoned for single dwellings westerly: Maplewood Care Center and single dwellings Past Actions 11 -4 -65: Council approved the BC zone on the Hillcrest Development site for the construction of a small shopping complex. 3- 21 -83: The planning commission tabled a proposed rezoning of the BC zone to R -1 to give Hillcrest Development time to apply for a plan amendment. 5- 16 -83: The planning commission set a hearing date for the plan amendment requested by Hillcrest Development and expanded the area west to the Maplewood Care Center, 5- 23 -83: The city council held a public hearing and tabled the rezoning until the planning commission considered the plan amendment requested by Hillcrest Development, 6- 20 -83: The planning commission recommended approval of the plan amendment as shown on page 7. 7- 11 -83: Council did not approve any amendments to the plan. 8 -1 -83: The planning commission tabled a request to rezone the BC zone to R -1, as they had addressed this issue previously and felt- the s i t e should remain BC. Z 9- 12 -83: Council rezoned the BC zone to R -1. 5- 14 -85: After a court hearing, district court voided the council actions and ordered the city to amend the plan as recommended by the staff and planning commission and rezone . accordin 19 Y Planning 10 Land use plan designation: RL, residential low density nd W.water Ytower 2. The RL designation is primarily designated for variety of single dwellings. An occasional double dwelling may be allowed. 3. The BW, business warehouse designation includes governmental and public utility buildings and structures, storage and warehousingfacilities, wholesale business and office establishments, cartage and express facilities, radio and television stations and other industrial uses of a lower- intensity nature. 4. The RM, residential medium density designation provides for such housing types as single dwellings on smaller lots, double dwellingsandtownhouses. 5 One of the general development design objectives in the comprehensive plan (p. 18 -5) states, "Whenever possible changes in the land use shall .occur at center mid -block points, so that similar uses front on the same street, or at borders of areas separated bymajorman -made or natural barriers." Taxes Mr. Gerald Augst, of the Ramsey County Assessor's Office, states that rezoning this area for commercial use would not affect the valuation or taxes of surrounding homes or even a home rezoned for commercial use. If the home was sold for -a commercial use, it would then be taxed as such. Public Works Sewer and water are available Parks The city's park plan proposes a neighborhood park in the area of County Road B and the North St. Paul border. The director of community services stated that the park and recreation commission is not interested in the Hillcrest site. K Citizen Comments Surveys were sent to the property owners within 350 feet. Of the 22 repY"i es, eight were in f avor , four had no opinion and ten .objected . 1. Planning commission holds a public hearing and makes a recommendation to the city cou nc i 1. 2* City council makes the final decision jC Attachments 10 Location Map 20 Sherwood Glen Plan -- existing 3. Proposed Plan Map 44D Existing Zoning 5. Proposed Zoning 6. M -1 district 70 Resolution- -plan amendment 8. Resolution -- rezoning 9. Applicant's letter of justification 10* Court order 4 IGHTS C.' WHITE I F KOHL Ape AVE. KOH IIE LMA AV. L •• r ROAD 31 MLL NO. 65 V ` DEMONT AV W ;: 3N ST L- AVIE.2 0 1:0 a a K W A 11 ft AVE. SEX Ity L f Al a 6NDVIEWI Ou IVIKING TILE SHERREN AV pE AVEV Cower 491-%CQ F FLAIN ~ LARK AVE. ILAURIE ILR z lot EAll11 •C 1 ] IE 'D3 I L36E 77SIP, Z 25 371 ~AV W ' 43LAVE. U RKE AVE. BU16KE 34ELDRIDGI AVE. ELMO 9LC6- AVEAVIEE. lid ->64 BLDL •• :or 4C 4949 A umr ZAVIE. Z 14A ZP414 A nos IE.r Ir tWOOID Av A. LOCATION MAP" 6i Attachment one 00 " N MUM CO If inter an r in S C AP J_ Sherwood Glen RL9 residential low densit Existin land use NEIG1130"'100D LAND USE AM W. water tower Attachment two Ct for lot 3'6 1 L ,__! —!_ _IJJ _. - - -- 1. _1_1_ L_J L _ ! _! _! _! _L -jr- __I__ _ ! _L 'r ..r t. 1 1 22 ,1928 1930 C 1,qP EWOOD CARES - T - I _ VU Ot L I •1 " t { 1917 19271I I , i 1 i I '1 2272 , It I i . r N • f j _ r I , N 1 Q f... J LLJ doe 39 g9 T . 1-2A-7 Q W I - -t - - -• -- - W f 1 PROPOSED PLAN AMENDMENTBW, business warehousing RL, residential low density RM, residential medium density W, water tower Attachment three r 1 4r IL do M O=O 14 (4) V S 0 10 7) 9 is) 8 9 ) 7 6 4 3 22 1 INI It Its 15 r d' e 117 o o 050 0 0 00 I f 100 1 (67100 V.L iff ING R -1—V—E. _ _ _ _ He 192 1928 11 1930 ` ``= -'`. 6 17 9 25 7 9 1 . ... ..... .... Z A WrP 40 4 ;14 - i-- CZ Z 3 :r* iv IX, R R E N Of A A -r 3 Z Maplewood Care Centers = .,;;., A.3 2 1 1 t S 14 2 11 10 9 Or 4 25 2 27 16 17 1 2 2 924 3 0 4 Awl ........... Cop e Avenue 0124D 0 ILI A- 100 cl) V) "ZI JD O t)D WLN of's 0 47a 3:4F 074 1! Jor. I on 2t1. 011 33 4-J in pA SO. a v STO < 594.74 AVE 1-t- Z.9 7.3 T Q LO) DoE 0 f 54 ( 041.78 ac. Z77-3-4.' ROAD I PROPERTY Area to be rezoned LINE /ZONING MAP Proposed) M-1, li manufacturin P-2, double dwellin 9 R-1, sin dwellin Attachment five Sec. 36-166. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in the U-1 District provided that, no use which is noxious or hazardous shall be permitted. a) Am use listed as a permitted use in a BC Business and Commercial District, if the property is not designated for ISC Limited Service Coa- t AP mercial or b Residential Medium density use on the city's comprebensive plan. • b) Wholesale business establisboents. c) Custom shop for maki articles or products sold cap the premises. d) Plumbing, heating, air conditioning, glazing, painting, paper- hanging, roofing, ventilating and electrical contractors, blacksmith abop, carpentry, soldering or welding shop. e) Printer's shop. - f) Place of amusement, recreation or assembly. g) Bottling establishment. b) Manufacturing, assembly or processing of: I) Canvas and canvas products. II) Clothing and other textile products. _ III) Electrical equipment, appli cances and supplies, except heavyelectricalmachinery. 19) Food products, except meat, poultry or fish. Y) Jewelry, clocks or watches. M Leather products. VII) ued1cal, dental or drafting equipment, optical goods. VIII) Musical instruments. UX) Perfumes, pharmaceutical products, rubber products and synthetictreatedfabrics. X ) Small products from the following previously prepared materials:r Cork, feathers, felt, fur, glass, hair, born, paper, plastics orshells. XI) Sporting goods. xII) Tool, dye and pattern making, or similar small machine shops. X111) Wood products. 1) ;arpet and rug cleaning. j) Laundry, dry cleaning or dyeing plant. k) Laboratory, research, experimental or testing. _ 1) Offices m) School n) warehouse o) Accessory use on the same lot with and customarily incidental to anyoftheabovepermitteduses, including an apartment for security purposes. Code 1965, 1 909.010; Ord, No. 395, 1 1 5- 13-76; Ord. No. 556, 1 1, 12-12-83) See. 36 -167. Conditional uses, a) The following uses are permitted in an 4-1 District subsequent to 'approval of a conditional use permit: 1) Used car lot. 2) Yard for the storage, sale or distribution of lee, coal, Mel oil,building materials or similar materials. Junk salvage or wreckingyardsshallnotbeallowed. . 3) ArV use listed as a permitted use in a BC Business ComercialDistrict, if the property Is designated for LSC Limited Service Commercial or RN Residential medium density use on the eity'scomprehensiveplan. Any use of the same character as a permitted use in Section 36 -166. 5) Trucking yard or terminal, b) No building or exterior use, except parking, shall be erected, alteredorconductedwithintwohundredfeetofaresidentialdistrictwithout aconditionalusepermit, Attachment six Plan Amendment Resolution WHEREAS, the City of Ma lewoo •P d i s cons l der i ng an amendment to thMaplewoodcomprehensiveplanfromRL ebusinesswarehouse r esidential low density to BW,and RM., residential medium densit for thboundedbyHighway36, North St. Paul Y e propertyandCopeAvenue. WHEREAS, the procedural hi stor of 'follows: Y this plan amendment is as 1. This plan amendment was initiated b 'y Hillcrest DevelopmentandtheCityofMaplewood, 2. The Maplewood Planning Commission h •June 20, 1983 and June held a public hearing onne17, 1985 to consider this plan amendmenNoticethereofwaspublishedandmailed t ' present at said hearin w Pursuant to law. All personsgeregivenanopportunitytobeheardandpresentwrittenstatements. The planningthecitycouncilthatsaidplanamendment be approved.. 3* The Maplewood City Council did • 11 1 not approve said planamendmentonJuly , 983. 4. District court, on May 14 1985 'and ordered the ci Y • • voided the council actiontytoamendtheplanasproposed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE Mtheplandesignationsfor A PLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that9rthefollowingareasbechangedas •9 follows. 1. The area bounded b line of block Y Highway 36 North St Paul, the southock11, lots 1 through 15 and block 1andthewestlineofthe , lots 1 through 5,e east :half of block 7, lot 26 and block 1lot5shallbechangedfromRLtoB 'W, business_ warehousing, 2. Block 10, lots 28 through 30 and block 11, lots 16 throw h22 changed from RL to RM residential and 27 through 30 shall be chan 9 medium density. Approval is based on the district court'surts order. Adopted this day of 1985. Seconded by Ayes -- 11 Attachment seven Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called artd held in the council chambers in said city on the day of 1985 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated the following rezonings: 110 From R -1, single dwelling residential and BC, business commercial to M -1, light manufacturing: Block 6; Lot 1 - 15, Block 11; Lot 1 - 4 and the East half of Lot 5, Block 10; and Lots 27 - 30 and the East half of Lot 26, all in Dearborn Park, Section 11, Township 29, Range 22, 2. From R -1 and BC to R -2 double dwelling: Lots 16 - 30, Block 11 and Lots 27 - 30 and the East half of Lot 26, Dearborn Park, Section 11, Township 29, Range 22. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on June 17, 1985. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on , 1985 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written - statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission., NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 11 A+4 ^ L%r" aft M4- A;At-.4- w 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the P ublicwelfare. Q 4. The proposed change would have nog negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers police 'p ce and fire protectionandschools. 5. The previous rezoning to R -1 was voided b districtct court. 6. Rezonings, compatible with the plan amendments are requiredbythecourtandstatelaw. 7. The proposed zonings are the most compatible with the court ordered plan amendments Adopted this day of , 1985. Seconded by Ayes-- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY } SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of-the City of Maplewood held on the day of 1985 with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full,, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to a rezoning. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the citythisdayof , 1985. City Clerk City of Maplewood. 13 STATEMENT OF WRITTEN JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE IN LAND USE CLASSIFICATION Applicant Hillcrest Development, the owner of numerous lots previously described, which are located along Minnesota Trunk Highway 36, north of Cope Avenue and west of Ariel Street, submits this Statement of Written Justification for Changing the Land Use Classification under the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan for that property. We believe that a change from the existing low- density residential classifi- cation to a commercial classification is warranted for the following reasons: 1. The property in question is situated in an area of high ground on the frontage road immediately bordering Highway 36. A portion of the property was acquired in eminent domain proceedings by the City a few years ago for construction of a'large water tower. 2. It is fair to say that the trend of development along Highway 36 over the past few years supports the pro- posed change. Virtually no residential development has occurred; rather, the uses are commercial and institutional in character. In fact, a portion of the subject property is currently zoned commercial, and has been since late 1965. Thus, the proposed land use classification will not have any adverse effects on, and will be more desirable to, the surrounding neighborhood, the City of Maplewood, and the comprehensive plan itself. 14 Attachment nine IAttachment 7 - continued I r 30 Most of the land use classifications along Highway 36 between Highway 61 and North St. Paul are commercial. The subject property is the only R -1 classification along the highway. It is unclear why this property should have received the R -1 designation,.other than the fact that at some time in the past it was platted. 4. There is no realistic possibility that this pro- perty could ever be developed into single- family residential housing. This is so because of its proximity to a major, high- volume highway, as well as the large Maplewood water tower. Given a choice between this location and some other location which had no such incompatible uses present, no one would build or buy a home in this area. 5. From a rational planning standpoint, it makes no sense to designate this property as residential. Rather, a more intensive commercial use should be permitted on this property, so that it can blend with the residential areas which exist farther to the south. 6. If the proposed change to a more rational and compatible land use classification is not approved, Hillcrest Development would, as a practical matter, be deprived of all beneficial use of the property in question. In Hillcrest's judgment, this would amount to a taking without just compen- sation. 15 I V LAIS, BANNIGAN & .KELLY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 5TH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 DONALD L LAIS JOHN F. BANNIGAN, JR. PATRICK J. KELLY May 20, 1985 Mr. Barry Evans Maplewood City Manager 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 RE: Hillcrest Development vs City of Maplewood Dear Mr. Evans: AREA CODE 612 224 -3781 Enclosed find the following documents: 1) Copy of Judgment entered May 14, 1985 received May 15, 1985; and 2) Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order for Judgment dated,, filed and entered May 6, 1985* The Judgment was entered consistent with the authority vested in me by the Council to effect a settlement without further legal proceedings. The Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order for Judgment reflect a stipulation entered into with the Plaintiff. That Stipulation is consistent with a conference held with the trial court after the submission of evidence wherein the Court indicated in general terms the direction he thought the evidence lead him. I confirmed this after submitting the Stipulation and proposed Findings to him. Lastly, the Judge has indicated a willingness to meet with me and councilperson Bastian for a conference to further explain the Court's position. The effect of the judgment is as follows: The rezone is vacated and consideration of Plaintiffs application to amend the land use plan must be reconsidered and action taken consistent with the recommendation of the planning commission and the director of community development. Once the comprehensive land use plan is amended, the zoning must be amended to reflect the plan. 15 Attachment ten i Mr. Barry Evans Page 2 May 20, 1985 The Court will retain jurisdiction to insure, that these steps, are taken.I will be happy to meet with the Council at its leasure ramification of this Court P to discuss in detail theaction. Sincerely yours, NIGAN & KELLY, P.A. Ian T B: cg Enclosures C: Geoff Olson 16 5'1 "H1't; OF MINNESOTA Sse COUNTY OF RAMSEY j fir iy 1 J Qti DI STRICT CO5 URT SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT FILE NO- 1 7 Hillcrest Development, a Minnesota limited •partnership, P aintiff VS PURSUANT City of Maplewood, Ramsey ount JUDGMENTYy, Minnesota, a municipal corporation,ROLL Defendant Pursuant to the Findings of Fact Conclusionselusions of Law and Order for Judgment Shumaker, J., dated and filed 5 - IT IS ORDERED: 1) The actions of the Maplewood City Council denyingY9' Hillcrest Development's application for a municipal lard use plan amendment and amending its zoning ordinance with respec to the Property involved herein are without rational basis and therefore void. Z) The application of H'illcrest Development to amend the lard use play. is remanded to the Maple wood Cit •y Council for further consideration and ap action cc;:sistent with the planning commisslon action taken uT ne 20 1983 (Exh. 6) ar.d as reccmrr,ende 'd by its Director of Coma uni t DeveY lopment in that Staff Report dated Junes 16 19fi 3 (Exh. 5) ar. d as graphically 'Y i Exhibits 19, 21 and 22. 3) This Court shall retain jurisdiction '1 Lion hereof for the purpose cf insurin that Maplewood City Council shall act upon Hillcrest Development's apPPn consistent with the Findings and Conclusionsnclusions herein and that the zoning r 'g dinance be appropriately amended thereafter . . ear ter consistent herewith and Minn. Stats. 473.865, Subd. 3 thereof. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY, without costs or disburserr_ents awarded to either side.itner sloe. John F. Bannigan, Jr-, for City f III Form CDCYplewood, 815B 17 Revised 8/81 STATE OF M1NNESOTA D COUNT MAY 61985.Y OF RAMSEY J. E. GQCK 1SK1, Clerk DeuY HILLCR £ST DEVELOPMENT,limited a Miitedpartnership, a Plaintiff vs CITY OF MAPLEWO OD# RAMSEY COUNT I ' llarnunIcorpora YMIN ' ation, Defendant. DISTRICT COURT SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FILE 464367 FINDINGS OF FACT ....... .... .. CO h CLi1S1{3;S QF ....... ANDORDERFOR7UDGMENT The above -er. titled matter came on for trial wi •thout a bundersignedJudgeof e the District Court at the Ramsey C%ovnt ; urCo y efore th Paul, on February 11, 12 a Minnesota G } ur 1 house, St. nd i 3, 1965. eo - P.the firm Of zrp.., Esquire, ofMaun, Greene, Hayes, S'-mon, Johanresor an Brehl, 332 HammBuilding, St. Paul MN 55102, appeare d for H' 1crest Delelo* nDornF. Barni r:r,e..t, pl San. Jr., Esquire, of the {.arm of Lais, $ann:g3n I;eBMidwestFeder } • P.A., 409alBuilding, St. Pau? N' r .,N ., 101 appeare for t1.e C". Defendant. } of Maplewood Based upon the f•Iles, records, memor •an °a -ru proceed;nSTIp'LATION of counsel dated the 9 Herein, the day j- • o1YofAlay, 1 ful } . 6 5, the Court now be'Ey advised, makes t beinghefollowing. FINDINGS OF FACT 1) That Plaintiff (hereinafter Hill crest") crest) is a family -o ned .Partnership duly lirnitedYor ., ani Zed and existin under and pursuant to thStateofMinn e lati's of theMinnesota, ar. d has been engaged in the purchase, sale 0 ownership and development of com •commercial industrial and multi reside. 'ntial real estate in the M Twin Cities Metropolittopn Area. 21 That Defendant (her "Maplewood") Maplewood ") is a municipal corporationdulyorganizedandexistingunderandpursuanttothelawsoftheStateofMinnesotaandiscurrentlyengagedinaprorarn9ofzoningcrdlnanceand .land use plan amendments. 3) That Hillcres t has been - the fee owner of record for over 20 y earsofanunimprovedtractof •land situated on the souths'lde of State Trunk HighwayNo. 36 (hereinafterr ''Hwy. 36 ") east of its intersection with white Bear Avenueanddescribedasfollows: Lots 16 and 17 Block - 1 ck 6, Lots 28, 29 and 3o B1Z• 3. 28, 29 and 30 Block oct: 7; Lotsck10; and Lots 14 , 15, 16 ar -11, all In Dearborn Park i ° Block and streets). ( the vacated aBe••sr 4) That MapleWOC.d •by Its R eso?u Lion No. E 6 -; ;- % - .. ,CdoPtea November9, 1965, amended its Zonin •ng Ordinance as it pertained f eto t,., abcve Bract fromResidential (R -1) to Business and Commercial (BC). S) That Hill crest has ,s lskettilse been the fee ov,rn r f .e of re'Ol d for manyyearsofunimprovedlandssituated -n the aforesaid location a ;d,acen t and neartheaforesaidtract, described as follo Lots 23 29, 25 26 27 _2 s, 2 9 and 3 0 Fi0 C; • t none-half of Lot 26, and Lot Z7 e east 3, q 5, 6, 7 8 Block 7; . n d Lots 1, 2Z7, 2 8, Z g a r. d 3 0, Block 11 `Park. (including th vacs a- in De rborrltedalle} s and streets) 6) That James and Gudrun iPomush, husband and wf e, wnc presentlyresideinCirclePines, 'Minnesota have since 1952 been the fee owners of recordOfanunimprovedtractoflandsituatedinthefor - 'esdld location between twoOftheHillcresttracts, dcscr'gybed as follows; 2- Lots 18, 19, 20, 21, and 22, Block 6; and Lots • 9 19 2 10, 11, 1213, l8 0, ' 21, and 2 2, Block 11, all in DeF- rborn Parkincludingthevacatedalleysandstreets 71 That Maplewood, ursuant to Minn. p Mi Stats. §462.351, et seq., adopted a Comprehensive Municipal Plan as define Minn. d n Mi Stats. §462.352, Subd. 5, In 1973 identifying the above tracts thereinn for low density residential uses. 8) That said tracts are bounded on the south by Cope Avenue, platted but otherwise unimproved, andnd on the north by Castle Avenue which is improvedP , although substandard in construction and serves as a frcntage road to Hwy. 36 connecting the controlled intersection of Co -.Cope Avenue and White Beer Avenue and the Ariel Street access to said Hwy. 6 _Y at the Maplewood Ncrth St. Paul city boundary. 9} That Hwy. 36 is a heavily traveld urban trunk highway averaging 25,670 vehicular trips per 'P p day in 1982 and 26,130 vehicular trips per day in 1983. 10) That White Bear Avenue is a - •high volume County State Aid Highway which is connected to Hwy. 36 b ay controlled accesS interchange. 11) That Maplewood acquired frcm H' 'q ill crest In 1977 through proceedings in eminent domain the site for the construction of a 1.5 million gallon elevated water tower on the following described tract: Lots 23, 24, 25 and 26, Block 11, Dearborn Paro k, Said water tower was thereafter constructed and has been in eAstence for the Past several yeF 12} That since Hill crest urchased the •P e trace in question, extensive light industrial, commercial, office and similar non - residential development has occurred along Hwy. 36 from its interse with State Trunk Highway No. 61 to the west and Century Avenue (the east count line Y ) to the east. I1ary of these land uses are in close proximity to single family esidentialY developments ,& 13) That in March of 1983 the Maplewocd Council •duly initiated proceedingc pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Ma 1 •p ewocd Code of Ordinances and Minn. Stats. §462.357, Subd. 9 thereof and §473.865, Subd. 3 thereof to amend Its zoning ordinance to comply with the Ma lewop cd land use plan. 14) That on the 21st da of March, 1983 the Maplewood Planning Commission tabled conside ration of the council initiated - zoning amendment for a period of six month •s to allow Hi.11crest to make an alternative proposal for the property. 15) That Hi-Ucrest applied April 26 198P 3 to Maplewocd for an amendment to the municipality's lard use plan from low density residential (RL) to limited service commercial (LSC) for the tracts descri 'bed in F 3), 5), and 6) above. 16) That the Maplewood r __P council on I`ay 23, ?983 tabled further consideration of its initated zoning amend tent from j TemLSC o R -1 o l; ... , . , ng Planning Commission consideration and recommendation -. .commendation on Hill:.rest s c _ pplication for land use plan amendment frcm RL 1 to LSC. 17) That the Maplewood D' :+P Director of Communilty Development by his MEMORANDUM dated June 16 3983 xh. S and 19 hereiE n } recommended amendin said land use plan from P.L - i • • -to Rri {Res,oental hlea:v:n Der1Sity; on the strip fronting Cope Avenue and 8w (Bu siness -W rWa on tI:e balance cf the tracts, subject to Metro Council ap 18) That the 10a lewood Planninglannln3 Commission considered Hillcrest's application at a public hearing thereon une7 20, 1983 and recommended to the Council approval of a resolution amending the land use 1p an from RL to RM and BtiOJ as set forth in Finding 7 Exh. 64 ( ) 19) That on July 11, 1983 Hillcrest's a lic 'p ation for land use plan amendment as amended by the Planning Commission came before the City Council at a public hearing thereon. Upon the close cf the ublic hearing, g, the council took no action on the application thereby n practical •Y p al effect denying the same without giving any reason therefor or making ary fact finding thereon (Exh. 7). 20) That on August 1 1989 3, the Council initiated zoning amendment from BC to R -1 for that portion of the* Hillcrest ro ertpp y described in Fending 3 came on for 'consideration before the Planning Commission. A Motion to recommend approval of said amendment failed. The Planning Commissiongmis.lon tabled further consideration thereof stating they had previous) addressed theY issue and the site should remain BC (Exh. 9). 21) That on September 12, 1983, a ublic hearing wPg as held before the Council to consider amending the zone on thee sLblect tract from 3C to R-1. Upon closing the public hearing, the Council approvedpp amending the zone based on the following: 1) The proposed change is consistent with the spirit,P , purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. 2) The proposed change will not substantially injureure or1detractfromtheuseofneighboringproertyorfrcmP }the character of the neighborhood and that the use of the property adjacent t o the area included in the ro osed change or plan is ad p p P adequately safeguarded. 3) The Proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4) The current zoning was done revious to adoption ofPpthecomprehensiveplan." (Exh. 10) 22) That Gary L. Tankenoff testified as one of two •o general partners in Hillcrest. The property described in Finding abovee was purchased In 1967 vacant and unimproved for commercial development ur oyes. 'P P P It is situated on one of the highest elevations in Maplewocd contiguous to Hwy. y. 36 with excellent visibility therefrom. With the siting f an9 elevated water .tower on contigLOUs property previously owned by Hillcrest, the high volume 'g of traffic, ar. d the level of highway noise on said Hwy 36, Mr. Tankenoff opined that the subject tract had no reasonable or probable . value for •single- family residential purposes. He was of the further opinion that commercial, office and/or fight industrial uses w were. the highest and best as well, as the. most reasonable and probable uses within the forseEable future for the subject tract. James Pornush, an owner of the land adjacent to the Hillcrest tracts and the water lower, testified by deposition onthe same matters in a manner consistent with Mr. Tankenoff, 23) That Alf on zo E. Perez, a registered • •g ed profeslonal enQlneer, specializing in acoustics and noise control, doing business as Northern Sound, scientific illy monitored and measured Hwy. 35 generated trafficoffc noise at the site in question. He concluded that the 'noise from Hwy. 36 exceeded State noise standards for single - family residential uses. 24 ) That Hill crest called as an adverse witness, Geoffrey . Olson,on, N'aplewood Director of C •ommunity Development, who testified that Hwy 36 is the principal alterial highway throughY9 the City with the highest traffic volumes and speeds. He testified that the Maplewoodpwood land use plan attributes the major source cf air pollution fo vehicular traffic• 'that nose generated by traffic has been a problem; that Ma lewocdP is bisected by several major highways and noise levels along these corridors are apt 'p to be high; and that low-densi residential development adjacent to •such highways s generally discouraged. hIr, o sonon testified that in his prcfessional judgment ) g nt the best expression of land uses compatible with the objectives of the Ma lewocp d land use plan and the existing circumstances surrounding the subject tract reflected in his prepo ed plan amendment (Exh. 6 and 19). 0 25) .That Hil:•.:: est presented + e testimony of Robert M. LaFond, of E.F. LaF'ond Co., Inc. who •qualified to testify as an expert in real rc ert valuation.,P p y aluation. He concluded that with the highg volume of traffic and noise cn Hwy. 36 and the proximity of the elevatedated water tower, the site n question was not co •nducive to .quality single - family residences compatiblepatible with the residences to the south. He determined that the 'highest and best use cf the site would be forr commercial and light industrial uses. In his opinion, the site had a fair market value of $1.95 per square foci for commercial and light industrial uses and a fair market value cf $0.37 per square foct for single •9 y residential uses. 26) That Hillcrest presented the testimonystimony of Kenneth G. Briggs, presently the director of land develo for Northeast Realty, a subsidia ry of Harstad -Todd Construction Co., Inc. and formerly director of community development for the City of Blaine Minnesota. He rid extensive experience as a planner and developer ofP single family residential subdArisions. He was of the opinion that the subject site was not marketable for any type cf single -familY residential uses without public subsidy. Y He was further of the opinion as a profesksional planner that the lard use laF n amendment proposed by the Maplewood Staff and reflected in Exh. 19 was 'the best and most reasonable and prababl use to which the site could be put consistentt with esting highways, the water tower, land uses, patterns of development 'P in the area and the expressed obfectives Of the present Maplewood land use lp an. 27) That Hill crest presented the testimonystimony of Howard N. Dahlgren, who qualified to testify as a professional ci planning expert. He presently serves the City of Roseville am ong others, as its planner. He concluded that singlge family residential use of the entire 'site was unreasonable in light of its physical 7-• setting and location and inconsistent with the stated policies of Maplewocd I s land use plan. He found that the uses propo-ed by the Maplewocd staff ar. d approved by its planning commission as •reflected in Exh. 19 best utilized the site consistent with its surroundingE. and the la • •land use plan. Exhibits 21 and 22 best reflect this. Business-warehouse uses along the frontage road would adequately screen out the sight, sound and dustut of .Hwy. 36. The medium density residential prcpoed north of Coep Avenue and south of the business- warehouse use would provide an adequate transition r - •f om the non residential to residential uses south of Cope Avenue consistent with the resent lardd •use plan. 28) That Maplewocd sub oEned as •F witnesses the folloi ing nclghbors from the area: a) Charles E. Themmes, Jr. who r U ct •resided at 12 Ca.,le Avenue, dust west of the subject site on the frcntage road. He constructednstr, _fed a deck at the rear of his home. Road noise and dust frcm -a •Hwy. 36 had no ,., erse effect upon his enjoyment of his home, deck and ard. He was • ,Y able to s1A „.p ,5, i the summer with the windows open while convalescin frc•m back surgery, b) Dana L. Toll, who resided at 1922 -- -Cas ale , en ue, on the frcntage road. She purchased her home a - r r • - year and a hall before the puo3lc hearingc. on zoning changes. She shopped aTOUnd and walked the area with her dcgs prior to purchasing. She found the aree. to be •iEt seclud andQti1LdEG or.o de.- :ruble for residential purposes. c) Nick F. Weller, resided -- •at 2236 Germ on Street, ]Maple% %rocd, south of Cope Avenue. He built a new home justst before the construction of the elevated water tower was begun. Since then, he has constructed a pool and patio in his backyard. Hwy. 36 noise and 1lution hasas no adverse impact on his enjoymEnt of the yard, patio and pocl. R- 29) That Maplewood called on one of its council persons, Mr. Gary Bastian, to testify as to the basis for the council's action. Mr. Bastian stated that the present BC zone was not consistent with the municipal land use lar.; that thePP uses permitted under the BC zone are potential nuisance uses to the surroundin residential uses, that BC zone was inadequately buffered from the low density residential districts to the south and west, that Castle Avenue might be inadequate to handle a mix of residential and business - commercial traffic; that the access from Castle Avenue to Hwy. 36 by Ariel Street was subject to clo: ure by MnDOT ar.d that because cf Castle Avenue being substandard in ccnszruction and the possible loc.,s of alternate access to the area from cicsu_Te et Ariel, police and fire prctection might not have adequate access to the si Based upon the above FINDINGS OF FACT, the Court makes the following: CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1) The Maplewocd Council finding in sups ort of the zoning amendment which reads: The prc posed change is consistent with tie spirit, purpa:e and intent of the zoning croinarce and ccr; jre.ens:ve pl an." is vagLe and does not have factual sup in 1 record, in pari]cular the recommendations of the planning comrr.ission, the staff reports, t;he testimony of Mr. Gecffrey Olson, the Itijaplewocd City Planner, Mr. Ke::neth G. Briggs, expert lard planning, ar. d Mr. Howard Dahlgrer., expert City Lard Planning Consultant, 2) That Maplewocd Council Finding in support of the zoning amendment which reads: ThE prcpoced change will not substantially injure cr detract from the use cf neighboring prcperty or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the usea cf the propertyadjacenttotheareaincludedintheprooredchapplay, is adequately afe p chan or Y guarded." is factually supForted in the record before the Council and this Court but is not legally sufficient beta 'use it lacks substantial relation to public health safety ar- d welfare. 3) That the Maplewood Council finding In support of the zonin amendment that states: The prc -posed change will servee the best interests andccnveniencesofthecommunity, where athepublicvtelf " = applicable and are. is vague and not legally sufficient 'having no factual bases in the record and no substantial relation to public health safety and wel.fare. 4) That the Ma lewp ocd Council finding in su ort Of the zoning amendment that states: The current zoning was done 'prevYOUS -to adoptiGn ofthecomprehensiveplan.." has factual basis in the record but was not legally sufficient having no substantialubstantial relation to public health safetety end weLare. S) That the failure to act u ;up the H cT=st a ,pl, cati for a lard use Plan amendment from RL to BW c .on.. xtutes in practical effect a deT }gas without findings making it impossible fort .his Court to f ind a rotionf,1 basis the; of o: . 6) That the actions of the C'lty Council den Hlilcrest's ap-lication to amend the 10aplewocd land use 1pan .and amending the zoning cr3nance as it relates to the tract in Ue •q ston were and are arbitrary, unreasonable and capricious and void as a matter of jaw. From the above CONCLUSIONS OF i. -..LAW, the Court makes the f ollowin 9 ORDER 1} The actions of the Maplewood City Council •denying Hivcrest Development's apPFion for a municipal lard use plar. amendment and amending Its zoning ordinance with respectP to the property involved herein are wi thout rational basis and therefore void. 2) The application of 'Hillcrest Developer. ent to amend -th a land use plan is remanded to the M * •aplewocd City Council for further •consideration and apT•rcpriate action consistent wit the planning commission action taken Tune 20, 19 83 (Exh. 6) ar. as recommendedended by its Director of Comrr unit Deeloprr,ent in that Staff Report dated JunF_ 16, 1953 (Exh. 5) ar. d as g .g phzcally dFp1cted In Exhibits 19, 21 and 22. 3) This Court steal] retain '= •lurlsdIctlon herecf for itie purpose cf insurin that Maplewood City Council shall act upon Hill crest Develop. .a ppli cat ion consistent with the Findin s and Conclusions herein and 11at the zoning .ing ordinance be- apFrcpriately arr'ended thereafter consistent here v . J th a. *A ; u j .nn. Scats. 9 73.86 5, Subd. 3 thereof. LET JUDGMENT BE E1tiTERED ACCORDINGLY without costs or disburserr.ents awarded to either side. Dated at St. Paul, Minnesota this •s day of l4ar. 1q85 r T R T v Gordon W. Sh -"- -"u m a i, r -...._ Judge of District Court Ij- Acti by Council: MEMORANDUM Endorse Modif ie - ile j e ct a d...... —..._. Date T0: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Ripley Avenue Water Main (West of Edgerton) Project No. 85 -04 DATE: June 28, 1985 Plans and specifications have been prepared for the above —named project and will be available for inspection by the council at the July 8, 1985 meeting. The resolution orderi preparation of these plans and specifications was passed by the council contingent upon the developer of the Granada Addition entering into a developer's agreement with surety for 150% of his cost. This agreement has been executed. It is recommended that the council pass the attached resolution approving the plans and specifications and ordering the advertisement and receivi of bids. It is proposed to open bids on August 2, 1985 and have the council consider the bids and award the contract on August 12, 19850 e RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS, ADVERTISING FOR BIDS WHEREAS, pursuant to resolutio assed b • la P y the city councilonMay13, 1985 plans and specifications for Ripley Avenue-WaterMain, Project No. 85-04, have been re are • resented P P d by the city engineerwhohas ,P such plans and specifications to the councilforapproval, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COCITYOFMAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: COUNCIL OF THE 10 Such plans and specifications a c 'copy of which areattachedheretoandmadeaparthereof, are happrovedandordered1 herebyplacedonfileintheoffice ofthecityclerk. 2. The city clerk shall prepare and causeause to be InsertedintheofficialpaperandintheConstructionBulletianadvertisementforbidsuponthemakingimprovementundersuch of such ch approved plans and specific-ations. The advertisement shall be ubli 'least ten days before P .shed twice, atyredatesetforbidopening, shallspecsfy • the work to be done, shall state •be publ opened a that olds willYPandconsideredbythecouncilat10a.m. , on the 2nd day of August, 1985, at the cityandthatnobidsshallbe hall considered unless sealed andfiledwiththeclerkandaccompaniedPdbyacertifiedcheckorbiddbond, payable to the City of Maplewood,Minnesota for 5% of the amo of such bidP d' 3. The city clerk and city engineer are •g e hereby authorizedandinstructedtoreceive, open, and read aloud bidsreceivedatthetimeandplacehereinnoted, and totabulatethebidsreceived. The council will considerthebids, and the award of a contract, at the regularcitycouncilmeetingofAugust12, 19850 MEMORANDUM OT - 1 TO: City Manager FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson SUBJECT: Plan Amendment (OS and S to LSC, RH and RM LOCATION: White Bear Avenue and County Road C APPLICANT /OWNER: Smith Investment Properties DATE: June 27 1985 .fiction by Council: Endorse SUMMARY Modifie Rejecte Request Date Amendment of the land use plan from OS , open space and S schoolPP , 01 to LSC, limited service commercial, RH, residential high density and RM ,residential medium density g y Reason for the Request Harmony School has been closed and sold to the applicant. The OS andSlandusedesignationsareobsoleteandmustbechangedbefore redevelopment can occur. Proposal 1: Refer to the concept ' develo ment plan on aPppage 9. 2. Refer to the applicant's letter on page 11. 3. The site would be redeveloped in three P hases: Phase I: a. The LSC land use designation is proposed for the portion of the Harmony School building that fronts on Count Road C, to convert it to an office and retail mall . The y older portion of the school, closest to White Bear Avenue would be torn down, b. The RH land use designation is ro posed to adPp d on to the remainder of the school building to create a 52 -unit rental building for senior citizens. The stage and auditorium would be retained for an activity and recreation area, Phase II: The RH land use plan designation is proposed for a three - story, 52 -unit rental building with undergroundparking. The monthly rents would range between $500 and 700. The unit swould not necessarily be.restricted to the elderly. Phase III: The RM land use plan designation is proposed to construct up to thirteen, two and three' bedroom patio homes. 4. Once the land use plan is amended, the applicant w i l l requestzoningandsiteplanapproval. nMM c= n +- a This development concept is consistent with land use plan policies for establishing or amending land use districts. These policies include compatibility with the site and the surrounding uses, (See page 9 . Phase III was reduced from RH to RM density to be more compatible with the adjoining single dwellings. Phase I density was reduced from 56 to 52 units to allow enough parking. The plan originally proposed 30 to 40 patio homes. Up to 13 units would be constructed under the present plan. The resulting senior and family housing would also help the city move closer to achieving its housing plan goals. Recommendation (at least four votes are required for approval) Approve the enclosed resolution (page 13 ) to amend the land use planfortheformerHarmonySchoolpropertyfromS, school and OS , open space to LSC, limited service commercial, RH,. residential high densityandRM, residential medium density on the basis that: 1. This land has been declared as excess property and sold b the school district making he designations y g OS , open space and S , school obsolete. 2. The LSC and RH designations are compatible with the adjoiningcommercialandopenspaceuses. The RM designation provides an orderly transition to nearby single dwelling properties. 3. The site fronts on White Bear Avenue and County Road C. each with the capability to provide safe and adequate access for the proposed uses. 4. The proposed senior and family housing is needed to achieve the city's 1980 to 1990 housing plan goals for low -to- moderate and modest- income households, 0 2 BACKGROUND Site Description Area: 8.52 acres Existing land use: the former Harmony School structure and two softball diamonds and basketball court in the northeast portion of the site that are used by North St. Pau 1 and Maplewood for recreation programs. Surrounding Land Uses North: Ramsey County open space East: a single dwelling on a 20.0 x 630 foot parcel. The south half is planned for RL, residential low density use and the north half is planned for OS, open space. South: County Road C. Across the street is Ramsey County-open space, a single dwelling that is planned for SC, service commercial use and commercial uses on the corner of White Bear Avenue. West: 'a convenience mini -mall, with gas pumps fronting on White Bear Avenue Past Actions 10 -7 -82: Council amended the designation of the former Hazelwood School s i t e to RB, residential business for a combination office building and senior citizen housing development. The RB designation allows high densityYhousing. Single dwellings and park land surround the site. Planning 1. Land use plan designation: present - -OS, open space and S, school; proposed - -LSC, limited service commercial, RH, residential high density, RM, residential medium density,Y 29 Zoning: present - -F, farm residence 3. Polcies from the plan: a. Page 12 -11: High density residential areas should be located adjacent to or close to collector or arterial roadways, b. Page 18 -10: Locate multiple- family housing in areas not inferior to those generally used for conventional single-family housing. c. Page 18 -31: The LSC, limited commercial center classific- ation refers to commercial facilities on a neighborhood scale. 3 Heavy industrial uses, department stores, motels, auto accessory stores, etc. would be prohibited, while other land uses of a medium intensity nature would be permitted subject to meeting certain performance standards. d. Page 18 -30: The RH, residential high density classification is designated for such housing types as apartments, two - family homes, town houses, nursing homes, dormatories or elderly housing. The maximum population density is 34 people per net acre. e. Page 18 -30: The RM, residential medium density classific- ation is designated for such housing types as single - family houses on small lots, two- family homes, town houses and mobile homes. The maximum population density is 22 people per net acre. f. Page 18 -5: Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses shall be accomplished in an orderly fashion which does not create a negative impact on adjoining developments. 4. Housing: a. Page C-3: Senior citizen housing should be located: 1) In a residential district but with. good access to commercial facilities and services, such as grocery stores, drugstores, medical clinics and passive recreational areas 2) So that there would be quick response of emergency services.(i.e. medical, ambulance, police and fire) 3 ) Near public transportation b. 1980 to 1990 goals from the Maplewood housing plan: 1) Page C-31: 785 new modest -cost housing units are to be provided. As of December 31, 1984, 154 of the 785 units had been achieved. Modest -cost monthly rent are defined as between $575 to $600 (1984). 2 ) Page C-32: 620 new low -to- moderate income housing units are to be provided. As of December 13, 1984, 394 of the 620 units had been provided. Low -to- moderate income monthly rent is defined as not exceeding $575 (1984) . 3) The applicant is proposing monthly rents of between 500 and $700. 5. The city assessors of Coon Rapids and Brooklyn Center have done periodic studies that show that multiple dwellings do not devalue adjacent single dwellings. A study by the Bosclair Corporation in Bloomington from 1960 -70 found that homes adjacent to apartments appreciated at a slightly higher gate than homes that were not adjacent to apartments. A study done by North Star Appraisal in 1980 for O r i n Thompson Homes found that quads had no effect on ad' acen t single-dwelling home values or the time it took to sell these homes, A A This sales study was based on two quad projects 'in Savage and AppleValley. A 1984 study by Lafayette and Pierce, Inc. for Castle DesignfoundthattheproposedSterlingGlenapartmentsinMaplewoodwould not affect the marketability or value of adjacent homes. 6. Permitted density: no residential uses are planned for this site. If changed to RH, residential high density - -34 people/net acre. If changed to RM, residential medium density - - 22 people /net acre. 7. Proposed density: Phases I and II: 27.8 people /net acre Phase III: The density ould not exceed 22Y people /net acre. Town houses or patio homes are proposed. Between four and eightunitswouldbepermitted, depending on whether one, two or three bedrooms were built. Public Works i. Public water should be taken only from the St. Paul systembecauseofthecomplaintsoflowwaterpressurefromeolein thePp vicinity who are hooked up to the North St. Paul water system, 2. According to the city engineer, the traffic generated by this development would be adequately handled by the upgraded capacity ofPYtheintersectionofWhiteBearAvenueandCountyRoadCwithstreet widening and turn lanes. 3. White Bear Avenue is designated as a major arterial and roadwayYandCountyRoadCisdesignatedasamajorcollectorstreetinthis area Parks On May 20, 19 8 5 , the parks commission recommended to the developerthattheyshouldgiveconsiderationtokeepingtheballdiamondsin use until they have to be vacated. The commission would also like to go on record as recommending to the city council that this projecthavemoreopenandrecreationspaceforitsresidents. Citizen Comments Twenty -four property owners within 350 feet of this proposal were asked their opinion of the May 6, 1985 site plan (page 10) . Fourteen responses were received- -two owners are in favor, two had no comment and nine are opposed for the followin g reasons: 10 Apartment buildings are incompatible with a location near singledwellingsbecauseofincreasednoise, traffic, invasion of rivac ass problems) P ytresPP ). 2. The proposed density is too high, 3. The traffic would aggrevate the already dangerous intersection of County Road C and White Bear Avenue. 5 4. If the gym and stage are to remain available for larger gatherings additional parking should be provided, 5. There is need to provide additional outdoor amenities for seniors, including garden plots, grass, trees, picnic tables and to site the parking lots away from the views from these units, as much as possible. In response to these concerns, the applicant changed Phase III f rom RH to RM and reduce the density in Phase I from 56 to 52 units Other concerns will be addressed when the site plan is reviewed as part of the planned unit development process. Drnr•oA»ro 10 Planning commission recommendation following a public hearing 2. City council decision 310 Metropolitan Counci 1 review for impact on metropolitan systems jC Attachments 10 Hazelwood Neighborhood Land Use Plan Map (existing) 20 Hazelwood Neighborhhod Land use Plan Map (proposed) 3. Property Line /zoning Map 40 Site plan sent out for public comment 5. Proposed site plan 6. Letter of justification 7. Resolution Interchange interchangeprinc1Warterial694 OWL- Vadnal• Heights . ML L. C -- Co. Rd. D major coils or - i B RB - i ft Ma or == - A collecto ti 1W M ajor collector W IL " M L1 BW. f -- a b c• RB ( Q S 9 ..Q .w Inot Aerteti Ilit t S C i s S ±- = r ---- - 17 s - oS E3 W' LSC f Me jor coile a R It nn E t Inn A RV Bw B, s r A r t o al - H hD sY 3 1 r. ,% of j--11 n -ter; in er ha ge C ' o w C c o _ 0 E t' 3 HAZELWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD USE PLAN Existin¢ Land Use 7 Attachment one Q N L Interchange _ InterchangeitPrincipalarterial694 Vadnai• Heights =- -Q _ rtas ssssarsar .r Irs 1 ~ - Co. Rd. 6 major colle or ` BW _ . RB _ mi alor o r DC,hector ... major collector 1 . _ t2.e rI a Bw. RM L- 01 R1 RB -S I. _ f I 1 _ R d 1 I10Orlerte f JL. M k-j R t 'o ---- p 04 losL31" BW • A ii - - ' I • S C Myj - tS Major colle _"'_ * _ arrc rrrarar s s is Rs 'mum =*Nunn[ LIBW a- L + ! 13 D a y 3 j o . .. .. In r ha e n- 0 c r a. v o 0 u C > W m < C _C.- o - bm fa - 0 0 o - E t 3t HAZELWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PROPOSED LAND USE R Attachment two Q for, I. Ire c . zz) B 6'T l . t 1 o.c. O ZO a U,r).) I 6 8 t= 111.E 1K - t , 9 r ! t It w 1.6 J 06C - 0 r N t N o.co1.01 di j TOO I a G (/5) 292 52371z gA . . 0 Oro a 5 (4) W Ji V U LS 49 o multiMaplewoodCovenant52unit p 1 e dwell _ Church (high density) .a 4. 2 0 } a. 5z O.C. 8 S ou 6 ) ( 7 PHASE II , 5Z senior housing units high density) Z •, Les s 2 4 3) ' =f' 1 Superette 9 3r PHASE I 13 ati o homesP _ t , , .................._ :_ (medium density) 2 r2 Fo Harmon School bui 1 di n k 2 ti2 PHASE III - 2 63312'" 16, 500+ square feet of office/retail 1 PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP Proposed development concept) 9 Attachment three 4 N r r M I r' 1 : • y 1 iAo do kr A7.1 let gas As Ib i • N : ••. AI y / : j' =. do 4 Z 41b C to OIL s f i &TAM •• •'1• r .1 _ . ; •' r7 I I w 1 a s 1 .,; 'c. IA L me .f / do V OP R ..j 'R • ' . w. . T' X11' •1 i w . ` vh WA b. , — - - .-- L 11••1 V C I \ _ - , / • • O j J1 z _Ile — h 6 IL tj tA m W a 11. 61G ? 5 -6 -85 site p l a n Sent out for public comment C h •• L t YA Pa 10 Attachment fou 1 -11 = 52-RESIDENCES i Y I *A10 PHASE 2 10 , - -1 p w m do cowwwwwoma so amr ' — + w.w. tip• 7p r 16 . y ow Gem "oes"Weve"s I HXSE f: Sect i3 90 -} t T i 1 1 i O OSEDFB COMMERCIAL ;3 `T. ?, N PHASE • s TRlUM MILL- a -,cT 1 GT I ; FU T R F -UE - rovi4 "am I \ ' I s NOT •{p jrGttO._I 1 wAlt l a _ M1CvM DL•JS.S I • nj - = rrrr -m r r r_r. r r r..ro r r .rfr +rte r r r r r . .w. GQUn1 • Q V) O C) 1• SMITH - INVESTMENT—PROPERTIES- HARMONY SCHO.OL:- -SIT -- -e. PRCLItAINARY SITE PLAN r,'TUDY- -- S 49-& 4 . f - -.4 G> • ACKERMANN & ASSOCIATES INC. ARCHITECTS A.I.A. 5T. PAU,- MINNE-S07A 55107 35 WEST %VAT'tA S TE:_EPf'.h L't r 4- U Q ANTHONY A. DANNA ATTORNEY AT LAW NORTHERN FEDERAL BUILDING WABASHA AT SIXTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 612- 224 -6 769 May 6, 1985 City of Maplewood 1902 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Re Development of harmony School Site Gentlemen : Submitted herewith for your consideration please find the following: Conditional Use or PUD Application Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application List of Property owners Preliminary Site Plan Filing Fees. The applicant herein is Smith Investment Properties, a Minnesota Partnership consisting of Bret M. Smith, N. Russell Smith and Norman P. Smith. The firm has retained the undersigned as Attorney, and the firm of Ackermann and Associates of St. Paul as Architects for the purpose of aiding it in the development of the abandoned Harmony School Site at White Bear Avenue and County Road Co Market Studies performed by the firm indicate a need in the area for multi - family 1 and 2 bedroom apartments. The developers intend to use the existing structures by converting the existing classrooms into the apartments. . , A portion of the exi sting structure which runs parallel to County Road C, is not suitable. for apartment conversion, and since it's felt that the complex will support certain service oriented commercial space, the developers have designated such space thusly. The developers are extremely sensitive to the concept of preservation of the neighborhood and to working with the cortununity as a whole in a positive and constructive manner. The will be open to suggestionsYpgg 11 Attachment six l from ' neighbors , staff , council and community with respect to the development of the property to its highest and best use, and look forward to becoming a part of said community. Ve truly ours, GAG ANT Y DANNA At orney at Law AAD : as Encl. 12 RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Smith Investment Properties initiatedpnitrated an amendment to the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan from OS, open space and S, school to LSC, limited service commercial, RH, residential high density and RM,' residential medium density for the following- described property:Y Unplatted land beginning at intersection of White Beat Avenue and South line of SW 1/4 thence northerly on said centerline 420.55 feet, thence east parallel with said South line 311 feet, thence northerly parallel with said centerline 140 feet, thence due north 107.07 feet thence east 391.55 feet to point 658.95 feet north from said South line thence to said South line at point 200 feet west of said 1/4 corner, thence west to beginning, subject to roads, in Section 2 , Township 29, Range 22 This property is more commonly described as the former Harmony Elementary School. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 10 The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 17, 1985 to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was publishged and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said plan amendment be 2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on 1985. The council considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. This land has been declared as excess property and sold by the school d i s t r i c t making the OS, open space and S, school designations obsolete. 2. The LSC and RH designations are compatible with the adjoining commercial and open space uses. The RM designation provides an orderly transition to nearby single- dwelling properties. 3. The site fronts on White Bear Avenue and County Road C, each with the c a p a b i l i t y to provide safe and adequate access for the proposed uses. 4. The proposed senior and family housing is needed to achieve the city's 1980 to 1990 housing plan goals for low -to- moderate and modest -cost households. Adopted t h i s day of , 1985* Seconded by Ayes -- 13 Attachment seven May 15, 1935 Mr. Geoff Ulsnn Director of Community Development Litt' of Maplewood 1902 East County Road 8 Haplewood, Minnesota' 55109 Dear Mr. Ulson: The following is response to the Harmony School Development Pro,je^t : I am def irately opposed to the proposal because of the high populat density which is not in keeping with family homes located nearby. The environmental impact, the lack of privacy, the intrusion into established life styles, the elimination of much needed recreational area, the effect on wild life space, the water shed factnrs are all threatened by this development. The protection of wild life habitat, ducks and birds nesting, etc., and the open space zoning which will markedly be overrun with people will degrade the quality of life In the area. Even with current fencing, the increase to people mainly from Lake Ridge Park has caused fires, invasions of privacy, tresspassing, hazard to wild life and garbage /refuse problems. If you lived here you would understand and appreciate this and reali how greatly these problems will be increased with more multiple dwwlling units in the area. Plans have been to maintain space, trees, wildlife in a low density population environment. Maintenance of fencing on school and open space property has had some deterrent to invasion of privacy and property but increased/ changed status can only cause more problems. Please refer also to 1Ptter of Linda La Pit z who lives at Sincerely, Dolores Ethier 2187 Floral Drive White dear Lake, 11n. 55110 this address., DU.`a •t r ., May 15, 1935 Mr. Geoff Olson Director of Community Development City of Maplewood 1902 East County Road 8 Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Olson: The following is my response to the proposed Harmony School Development. This has been a single family home area for years and the influx of this many people is in excess to reasonable land use. The proposal will have a devastating effect on my mother who has 1 ived, here all her l i f e , paid taocs on the land, and kept the area neat and to shape for single family use. Her hopes for her family, and her father's before her are poignantly endangered by these proposals. It will cause undue hardship an our family which has lived in this area for three generations. This does not take into consideration the rights of current residents, the impact an life styles of residents to the east and south of the area which is mainly all single family units, or the environmental consequences on open space orPp private props y owners. The density of population created will markedly reduce benefits of single family homes in the area. It will disturb the normal peace andtranquitity of the neighborhood. I do not believe there will be adequate space, adequate parking, adequate protection to private property and wildlife for this mass ofpeople. The environmental impact should be checked. Effect on wild life, recreatinn, Sanitation, traffic, police and fire protection requirement will be tremendous. The quiet neighborhood now becomes an activity hub with 311 the associated problems. If adequate water control is not provided, i.t could possible cause problems on current locations. There has been some serious questions on maintenance of proper water levels. Family residents near this area do deserve some consideration and current land owners,tenants and those who use the r recreational facilities are defini_tel yout" on this proposal. The present tenant at this duplex ( 2045 E 17th Ave. left an apartment dwelling on McKnight Rd. specifically to eaceetsome9Pandquietandabitofprivacywithoutpeopleessentially "on top of them." There are definite objections to this increased density and changing a family residence /school area to multiply dwelling units. Sincerely, Dolores Ethier Note: This response also given for Alice Olson, my ninety year old mnther who has lived in this area all her life. Dolores Ethier 2045 E 17th Ave. No. St. Paul, Mn. 55109 May 14, 1985 Mr. Geoff Olson Director of Community City of Maplewood 1902 East County Road Maplewood, Minnesota Dear Mr. Olson: Development B 55109 I have several comments to make about the proposed Harmony School Development project. According to the maps and tentative plans made available through your opinion survey there are a few points which need careful consideration. 1. Density -- The City of Maplewood has given this project its highest density rating of RB which allows up to 34 people per acre. This site has approximately 8.52 acres available for development. That would allow up "to 290 residents in this complex, excluding the proposed commercial development space. That is far too many people for this area. Immediately east of this area is largely undeveloped single family residen- tial space. This space has been occupied by my family, including myself, through four generations, so I am accutely aware of the land situation surrounding this particular site. My family's land extends from the Harmony school fence east to Casey Lake Park in North St. Paul and north to the open space in Maplewood. It is my grandmother's wish (she will be 91 this fall) that her land remain in the family. I am the oldest of seven children, and I can assure you that we have every intention of maintaining the family property within this family as single family residential space. We have no desire to live immediately next door to an overcrowded complex, particularly when we are making the efforts of maintaining space and trees and wildlife in a low - density environment. Immediately to the north of Harmony School is a large Ramsey County Open Space area of close to 10.37 acres. This space was sold by my grandmother for the purpose of open space environment. A small creek flows through it which is fed by the overflow from Casey Lake. This space is a wildlife refuge for geese, ducks, pheasants, egrets, woodchucks, muskrats, and a. large variety of other small animals. During the last few years the steady stream of adventuresome youth has increased to include elaborate treehouses, regular dire -bike practice in the summer and snowmobiles in the winter. The highly intense Lake Ridge Park Condominium development --which still is not completely occupied - -only increases the threat to this important wildlife space. While some people may maintain that some of the animals, particularly the muskrats, are not an especially desirable creature, the environment that they Create allows egrets to come back each year and nest, or occasional blue herons, and Canadian geese, which took ip residence in the park this spring. These animals are beautiful, and important, and help to increase the property values and the quality of life in this neighborhood. 2 an Overcrowding from the south only increases the dangers to this important open space area. 2. Curbing and Sidewalks -- It does not appear that the proposed development cif County Road C, with upgrading to include curbs and sidewalks, during the next three years has been included in this plan. That planning should be included as it will affect the proposed parking for commercial space along County Road C. 3. Commercial Development -- I have no objection to small commer- cial enterprises on this site, especially if support services for the elderl y and surrounding community are included. A deli, dry - cleaning services, etc, would be particularly welcome. It does appear that the parking has not been well planned. If commercial parking is primarily on the north of the site, only north -bound traffic will be allowed to enter the lot, and north -bound will be the only possible direction for exiting the lot. Commercial parking to the south will be limited, especially with the sidewalks. East parking, which appears to be ideal for residents and visitors, will be limited. Since any commercial development will attract business from the large residential neighborhood to the north and east, the east parking lot will be most attractivetothoseresidents. If the gym and stage are made available for communitJ arts and activities and events, the demand for parking to the east will be very heavy. 4. Parkin -- For the reasons just mentioned, and others connected with the Phase 2 and Phase 3 development projects, I am concerned that enough parking space be allocated to this development. Seniors, if they are on a bus -line, have a tendency to consolidate down to one vehicle per family or eliminate it altogether if possible. White Bear Avenue offers Route 15 which . goes north to Maplewood Mall or south to downtown St. Paul. Such a location as this is sure to encourage some seniors to eliminate their cars. But this area has traditionally been a challenge for bus - riders, and many residents will resist giving up their cars for personal transportation. In addition to the resident vehicles, you must consider the cars of visitors. Friends, family, support services including home health care workers, etc. will, in most cases, drive in rather than take the bus. Please be sure that adequate parking is planned for in this complex to avoid street overflow. 5. Senior qo%2lex, Designation -- In the District 622 News the School Board announced that "Harmony Elementary School . . . has been sold to Smith Investment Properties under the terms of a purchase agreement app rov by the School Board. The purchase price is $750,000. The purchaser intends to develop the property for senior citizen housing." I have no objection to the creation of a senior housing complex on this site. In fact, I think it is an ideal location, and would serve the community needs very well, particularly with an eye to long -range planning.. I would like to make sure that the ENTIRE project retain the "Senior Citizen" designation- - especially Phase 3. Unless the developer makes a commitment to dedicate the entire site to seniors, serious problems will develop. Phase 3, with two and three bedroom patio homes, may appeal to single parent families or parents with young children, and there simply is not enough space in this development for children. As the mother of three, I can't stress that strongly enough. 6. Recreational Facil --I have lived immediately next door to the Harmony school fence for over seven years, This project, particularly Phase 2 and Phase 3, are going to eliminate valuable park . and recreational space from our community. As a resident, I know, that the space is used three to five evenings of every week between April and October, with weekends also very popular. Many of these are informal games or practices that I'm sure have not been formally scheduled through the Parks and Recreation Department. 3 - The loss of these fields for baseball, softball, T -ball, and basketball, both games and practice, is going to be severe to many Maplewood residents, and put additional strains on other facilities or eliminate sport availabili 7. Phase Three -- This phase of the project bothers me more than any other aspect of the entire proposal. The prospect of living immediatel next door to thirty or forty, two and three bedroom, two -story patio homes in the proposed site within the allocated space scares me. I am not anxious to have all that humanity crowded into tiny little spaces next door--toweri over this little house, and within fingertip reach of the fence. For one thing, the architectural drawing shows only twenty -seven units, not thirty or forty. For another, the floorspace is much smaller than the typi- cal one bedroom unit shown in the tipper right corner, and even a two story unit will not provide much area for movement, especially if they intend to squeeze three bedrooms into the tiny area. Another consideration, again, is the lack of parking. A three- bedroom unit encourages a family with more than one car. Again- -where do the visitors go? There is no space for outdoor recreation. Does that mean they will spill over into my back. yard, or will the residents be encouraged to peel back the fence for access to the open space and wildlife near the lake? 8. Overall Qual#y -- My final concern is with the quality of thi project. Obviously, Smith is expecting a profitable return on the investment. If this is a qual - ity project, using good materials and adequate planning to provide a quality environment for the residents, then a stable environment will produce the low maintenance and profitable return the investor hopes fo . If cheap materials and a desire to pack as many people in as possible overri e the consideration for a quality environment, there will be problems affectin the entire project and all the surrounding areas. Quality of life demands space for outdoor recreational activities. Most seniors feel a need for time and space outdoors Picnic tables, a small garden area, grass and trees are very important to area residents. They should be important to the developer of this project also. Not all seniors will be able to walk up to Casey Lake Park, and to look out your window into a parking lot can be very discouraging. The quality of this development should be closely supervised. In sum, the development of this project will have a tremendous impact on my family and me through its impact on the adjoining property. I hope you take my comments into consideration. Sinerely c / nda Olson LaPitz 005 East County Road C Maplewood, MN 55109 J May 17, 1985 Mr. Geoff Olson Direct of Community Development City of Maplewood 1902 E . Co. Road 8 Maplewood, MN 55109 With regard to the Smith Investment Properties Harmony School Site Devel- opment, I submit the following comments and information, 148 living units plus a commercial development are proposed on 8.53 acresofland. 1 to 3 bedrooms in 1 i v i ng unit means somewhere around 400 eo le or more.P P I don't have privacy on my property now with 0 people on the Harmon y site.Just because I have a large back yard it apparently belongs t o ever bo deverybody--aplaceforthekidstoplay, a place t o walk the dog, to cut Christmas trees and snowmobile in the winter time, and even a place to launch their boats in the water from my l i t t l e private dock on the lake. Can you imagine what it is going to be l i k e with 400+ people right on, top of ,us, but then Y ou can't stop 'progress.' My main purpose in writing is to serve notice on the city of Maplewoodandthedevelopersofthispropertythata "people proof" barrier must be maintained bV the developers between the development and my family's property.tP y•We have a right to privacy having owned this property for four generationsandIdon't expect the developers and the city to come back later and sayit ' s not our problem, you will have to deal with the people who l i v e there,," You are creating the problem now and must see that the necessar y provisions are incorporated in the approved plans to insure our privacy. This means installing and maintaining whatever barriers are necessary to prevent access to our property, including that from the open space which will certainly be used by the residents, This letter is notarized and becomes a legal document which we intend to use in any litigation which may become necessary in the future regardingthismatter, Sincerely , 0 "V. Delbert L. Olson 2027 E. 17th Ave. North St. Paul, hW 55109 1700F(MY NOTARY P1 — 1 WNISOTA RAMSEY CClp-1 1Y pxnirot 1 ne 77 1AoA G i 2.•r M " MEMORANDUM Aotion by Counon: TO: City Manager ......... FROM: Thomas Ekstrand-- Associate Planner Endorse SUBJECT: Appointment -- Review Board Vacanc y 11odifiea ..._. APPLICANT: James Kochsiek Peieote DATE: June 27, 1985 Date On June 25, 1985, the review board recommended the appointment of Mr. Kochsiek to fill the vacancy on the board. The current review board roster is as follows: Members Term Expiration Date Donald Moe 3rd term expires 1 -1 -86 Robert Peterson l st term expires 1 -1 - Fran Juker 1st term expires 1 -1 -86 Thomas Deans 2nd term expires 1 -1 -87 George Rossbach l st term expires 1 -1 -87 Vacancy term expires 1 -1 87 Mr. Kochsiek's resume is enclosed jC Attachments: 1. Application for the board position 2. Applicant's resume r MAPLEW BOARDS do COMMISSIONS APPLICATION, FARM NAI"E Date ....._-Z S itDDRESS Phones Rome AGE 31 HOMEOWNER =Number of Years as a Homeowner NO Number of Years as a Resident would regular attendance at meet be diffmeetingsi cul t s Yes No On which board or commission are you interested in serving on? List 6 number I being first choice, z COMMUNI DESIGN REVIEW BOARD — PARK & RECREATION C:OMM.I S SI C3N HOUSING do REDEVELOPMENT J -AUTHORITY PLANNING COMMISSION HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSIOH If . this is a Renewal Application, total number of meetingsing held on your board or co s si on this past year? Row havny a you missed? Education 0 & 14 / V .'j/ -- --- 111OX G,r ii %G ,J iG' Present Occupation and Employer xc;I;Cl - 77/ C / r LC, Number of Years Hew Applf cants only: Previous job e eexperience and employers. list last three), Z IZC Z (,166:-0": j OXAIA: Z Ala /`7 3'Grt,' /,' iC, : /' "tit f/ 4' List Organizations or Clubs in the Community n whichch you have been, or are an active participant. Background experience in any of the Boards or.Commiseions, If any. Whey would you like to serve on arty of these boards or commissio Z7 / `L w Ir C'E1f ,01iJ J /G 1J CIAJ IX'lr-- - Z A. ce14 7X/ Additional Comments. ' tl' l' ,f J # 4 C f t JAMES R. KOC HSIEK 1624 Brooks Avenue East St. Paul, MN. 55109 612) 770 -8041 JOB OBJECTIVE To utilize my technical and business skills providing significant contribution to a cccmpany and opportunity for personal growth SKILLS TECHNICAL analyzing Civil Engineering /Geotechnical problems and utilizing problem solving techniques designing appropriate solutions oral and written commnication of methods and results practical knowledge of technical equipment working knowledge of statics, dynamics, and other physical concepts BUSINESS supervised sales personnel developed prorrotion and advertising performed sales responsibilities purchased merchandise for resale hired and trained personnel prepared schedules and layouts EDUCATION 1979 -1983 University of Minnesota Institute of Technology, Bachelor of Civil Engineering, GPA 3.2. Studies included; Geotechnical and Structural Engineerincj , 1iydrology, . 1973 - 1975; Saint Cloud State University, Bachelor of Elective Studies, Business and English. 1971-1972; University of Minnesota, General lower division curriculum. WOW EXPERIENCE May 1984- Present; Braun Engineering and Testing Inc., Minneapolis, M Materials Engineer; analyzing geotechnical and structural roblems analyzingP construction materials and practices, reviewing technicians work, developing concrete mix designs, surveying of construction sites, non- destructive testing of concrete and timber, roofing analysis, instructor for the use of the nuclear density gauge, training new personnel on testing procedures. March-1979-May 1984; United Parcel Service Minneapolis, Me above average performance of sorting function while attending the University. training new personnel. August 1978 -March 1979; United Airlines Minneapolis, MN, expanded responsibilities in flight arrival and departure Pte' re ation in short time,P August 1976-August 1978; North Country I ncorpora teal St. Paul , M . hired as salesperson and prc noted to Assistant Manager of retail Sporting Goods Operation, 1971 -1976; Various employment capacities; gained miscellaneous work experience while attending school. REFERENCES: Available upon request. 3 -3 MEMORANDUM lotion by Council: TO: City Manager FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson 1naosdm..,,,,,, SUBJECT: Tax - forfeit Properties J(odifie DATE June 11, 1985 ]ejeote Date SUMMARY Request 1. Authorize use -deed applications to be made to Ramsey County for the transfer of eleven tax - forfeited properties to the city for drainage or right-of-way purposes . 2. Request Ramsey County to withhold the sale of Outlot C, Maple Green's l st Addition for one year Proposal 1. Refer to the enclosed maps on pages . 4 through 9 for the location of each parcel. 2. Refer to pages 2 through 3 for a discussion of each parcel. Recommendation 1. Approve the resolutions on pages 12 through 20 to transfer title for eleven tax- forfeited properties to the City of Maplewood for drainage and street right -of -way purposes. 2. Approve the resolution on page 21 to withhold Outlot C, Ma P le Green's 1st Addition from sale at auction for one year. BACKGROUND Parcel De Page No of Report 4 4 4 4 scriptions: Tax.Identification Number 57- 41500 - 010 -07 57- 41500 - 020 -07 57- 41500- 030 -07 57- 41500 - 040 -07* Comments Each of these properties lies . within an area designated for a storm water retention pond, as illustrated on page 10 4 57- 41500- 010 -09 This parcel is only three feet wide. It l i e s on both the west and east s ides of DeSoto Street. The part west of DeSoto Street is 34.3 feet long and abuts the Kingston Avenue and DeSoto Street rights -of -way. The adjacent owner does not want it, The part east of DeSoto Street lies between the unimproved Kingston - Avenue right -of -way and city property used for a pump station. It is unlikely that Kingston will be constructed due to the steep grade . 5 57- 48900- 103 -03 This property is inundated by a drainage P and see page 10) . 5 57- 48900- 250 -03 This parcel is inundated by Oehrline's Lake. 6 57- 22000 - 010 -01 This strip of property is needed for the future extension of Gervais Avenue to Ariel Street. The street has to curve to the south unless the existing utilities and a dwelling are relocated. 7 57- 80800- 070 -01 A city storm water pond and Williams Brother's Pipeline easement are located on this parcel. 8 57- 01810 - 010 -86 A pond exists in the southeast portion of the site. The remainder of the site will be auctioned by the county for development. It is developable and zoned for single - dwelling use. 9 57- 48950 - 010 -04 This parcel (Outlot A, Maple Greens 1st Addition) is needed for a public drainage ditch. There is no easement of record for the ditch. It serves as an inlet for the pond to the west and is consistent with the intent of the drainage plan. g 57- 48950 - 010 -06 This parcel (Outlot C. Maple Greens Addition) was org inally intended to be part of a private park system that never materialized. It was forfeited f or taxes. There is no public purpose for this parcel and it is not a buildable 1 of . The best use is to combine it with adjoining parcels for rear yard use. This will encourage better maintainence of this land. The HRA will be including this parcel, along with several other tax -for- feited parcels, in a proposal to council for a land transfer program. This program would include a request to the county to deed Outlot C to the HRA, so they can administer the deeding and division of land to adjacent property owners. A survey of owners showed an interest if there were no significant costs to the owners. The HRA is involved, because the county does not want to get involved in the division or distribution of the land. Until the HRA makes their proposal, the county should be requested to withhold Outlot C from auction. This will prevent a specu- lator from purchasing the lot and applying for a variance to build on it, Planning Chapter of 462.356, Subd . 2 of state law states that "after a comprehensive municipal plan or section thereof has been recommended by the planning agency and a copy filed with the governing body, no publicly owned interest in real property within the municipality shall be acquired or disposed of, not shall any capital improvement be authorized by the municipality or special district or agency thereof or any other political subdivision having jurisdiction within the municipality until after the planning agency has reviewed the proposed acquisition, disposal, or capital improvement and reported in writing to the governing body or other special district or agency or political subdivision concerned, its findings as to compliance of the proposed acquisition, disposal or improvement with the comprehensive municipal plan. Procedure 1. Planning commission recommendation 2. City council approval 3. Ramsey County approval mb Attachments 1 -6 Property Line Maps 7 -8 Drainage Plan Excerpt 9 -17 Resolutions (use deed application) 18 Resolution ( Outlot C) C 34 " k zaa T7ic- o e, oto - 6T 4oil) ; LO , . 310 •' QQ 37ac . 3t se r o1ELI) /OUTLOT B s4 •4 41 .4 LL 4` Z'4 otoQyZ t2o v. i 31613 in u EMA 0 66 `t.t 0`I 40 66 c • 7 f . 7 66 50 Cu) g a Zb 2 2 a Ir 29 2 (WIN 21 031 0 29 ) 2e ' _ 20 3 ( ) 3s T 4 • Lt zs 24 !rj /8)1 `% 1$ S ' iAll- 39 — --X25 24 7 Ct 61.2 40 - • 40 2 2 7 6 ` '.'` t 6 7j24 . i3 (33)2 3 f $ • ' 21 11) : (3)15 O c1 -t 140 u , L'q g (08 Ia 0 54I321~ 1 I0 t1) D21 • o Z- 2 S ?Io ` 6 30131, 9 ( 7/)13 s LL o_ — 61) 5O (4,) — - i 1 it t5 .. 31 ` ' l T' ISO • o ro Parcels (57- 41500- 010 -07) - Parcel 57- 41500- 010 -09 61.o 4O ` 40 1 14 010 57- 41500- 020 -07) ie A +rs s , K ! NG S N _ _ _ ___ _.. _. _ 1 (57- 41500- 030 -07) -Z 3 57-41500-040-07) Unimproved City Pum P Z•• – - + -- 3 L)2 1 a C Station .– - _ . _ 3 ! '• 1 Sec. -- ;K : :;.: !'•' 9T 4 24 5 05P ) ts 23 Cow 4 ' 7 4 a C o Q, t , 23 - Awl 22-46 2l Si 8 r51' t s 10 =39) i Q' ;4j o •1J2A 9 (,L21 _ 1 2 nh. a uj 1 r5T) touj 13721 175 Q 1$ 1{ A 40 0 < b• 0.2 3 4- 3etq016 — o tT o o' fr , i :.r 1 ,AL QQ-1, il ! 3 wlDewlr+a MAJ 24o-ii N _T:_ r 1 /s- / PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Tax – forfeited Parcel 4 Attachment One Q N M in IGO 0 33 47.5 $ t6$g1l8. 11 gip'• 'D too 100 1sO.f1 30 4 IZT•62 i1 11 in + sell 640 ID duo 'o 1 20b• fol 0 4 7s N o ' • ' '.r °) fir, e w 00 LEI dw K. 190 , ' .p •:;:. ; :•:::. ,4 0 Parce #57 48900 •' :.... .103 -03 r'-• t 0 E H R L I N E "S:y:::::. f , df gig ll :•: r .. is • • • j j.• i . Pii • J: rati. j , , . • i : : • • : :•: ••• fi •. • : : tip• {;r.Y' • • ': ; .;•• LIN 1.;.. j,•f••, • j. •• /: ri• Tit•; 0 f ;. i • : • •. .Ye• is • i •:: O AYR, i f•'. •? : :•.• :.' •: :i;i • J.•/.'. / IX o41 Di 9) ••• •••.. O W N 01 • ::. • . J i r a — ate— —. ' a • Y :y::+ ti• }.' \ \ 7A t p 1 10 IA A L 59.29 9 0 , , 7._._ :.+, ---- .. 5 7- 48900 -2 50 -0 3 SOL. %Z% { 1 /.1 •gar„ c • '• Ow • Q ;1 ' Zoo O ; a 0 ! !y r:• ;: •' . ''.;:at qrODLft wa iE r Ir - 1. . j . • w-mw 1 • A[AYW 3f.is 41 •fd'- r- _ e ; / 31 j uO ac .'Stec 31 33 dw Ll 0 os o 1 1 1 . 4 1 O 1 I PROPERTY.' LINE /ZONING MAP Tax- forfeited Parcel 5 Attachment 2 4 N i'Iw l 0 ft41 E 01 NE 9 ao Q IW L; 1 I ul IA I 3S arm.44 Z3) PROPERTY.' LINE /ZONING MAP Tax- forfeited Parcel 5 Attachment 2 4 N CCU 89 86c 09 ) o 1 6 5 • " t , ELEVENTH 30 3 O I 1 S7 t ° ,T^X.04 VUIL RO • C.F 313 2Z• Z Doc 8 3 p p Stream* Esr+t. s 33 P E 71.5 •' - 91e 1.41 , , 9SMT.373 AV E e — X22 1 • a ate.. 79 Z) 5 Sjl ! • 7 g av t • 0000 „ N335N r 80 o 9 1 I t 4 k I , .4Q as. 170 ire 0 IC 41 0 00 eelS -i to 3 n. D3OS (d) P / t 7) 3 nl LLF ac -- g5 R.5' .• ' ... l j GERVAIS .. . 113 OWN 4%441 100 100 100 70 . :. j x , I I 1 I p 3 7)'p 1 1 1 1 - L ev t ,• • • S • •• t •1 i 1 * • • old 4I 71 13 (3) 1: 60ACt 9 071 cpo 4 ! 4 10 9 8;; ? 6 r 5 4 3 2 1too ( 7) 09). O O2S _ D !o ! OO07 • a s 15 ' o o 's) 1 40 16 ; I 3 3 bye-- SO 100 . , « , too !07 j 1 1 1 r Y VIKING 3 1 1 1 , , T. H 1 36 r--- t PROPERTY LIN MAP Tax— Forfeited Parcel 6 - Attachment 3 1 N E slow 4M 400010M I• O • • • • ••• t AVE& w "'Ts' 4FIr"'T d S a It I Z i 14 3j M , . 1 10 4d 7 •• -; 3 Z ` 13 12 1 1 J N 19 Mot e.. -t- i •S •c. . T tot - I V" 9It T _T_T- 28 Z5 31 1162. • 1 11 t 8 19 Zp Lt ?Z Z4 . t 5 lktj ..2 .. ..Oijso r PROPERTY "._INE MAP Attachment 4Tax— Forfeited Proeprty .• 7 4 N 400, 10 i ice• •'1 . . t to ./ ' ,• i .J q. ID 14 _ 000 No 4 4o 0000000loolo AX Kok 4. PAN is 1 r J ol - i Apartments sub 43 0000 loo T ' 13 Fox and Hounds 7 .:: ' .:Yti'•r •:: :. tiff :• % :: ' i• < .•.Y:' j ':tiJ :• v . • tidJ . _ .ir: ll.: • .. -..,. I • .V:•.;:L ::. • Property to be auctioned ' f or development - T / yr : : - • rr)nnerrres r :..:f:, ::.. Spl Authorized b Count deed .ti :•::. ::: .. .. Use— requested4 or ponding LL1 o K J ... Gas Station c 1 i,i, . r: , . -... . • _ irk , E PROPERTY Tax — Forfeited Property Attachment 5 t 1 d t . ommo• .. .. I• 1 t i 1 1 1 t i I i 1 Beaver Creek Condominiums j I f 1 I i 57-48950-010-04 X Ft I? L - -N 't)- EAV 7OUTLOTAK-71M S) (7)j }:.f::::; 1,61Drainabit'chStormWaterPond 7S o N 0 vlN' 4, 1 0 17 t9 til , • K ' r ^ N N N N 99 41 ) Z 20 4 .0. 1 ; -S - I L. Ilb ( 1 N . I or op 0 ) 4 C 14tia a jr 40 0S To 040 0% V I bfitb2,22 Cn T ( 1-7 2 4 o; I 01 1.,.D N ; , Lj4b 025zz4,, L 1, 2 2 qD ((I) 30 3 NY JAJ V6 n G goo ,. D 13 4 6 n Sr' L 5 Cli 57-48950-010-06. 1 I P* —'R'ck A KA I KI P 47 0.7A N CC) -7 27) I \ 4.13 10050pill 4v4 io Ila 0 1 0T C 2 R ' n cV Coo N OWS J-44-)AVE 41' ' ( 09 ac ki of 4-0) 4 on CL . 015 10 39) o \ 1,3S SI 198 3 Lp 014 4 7Ar O 9D h o ` i e, , ,y o 1 \` \ c ( ti :` ..dot* Cam) \ PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Tax—Forfeited Parcels 9. 4p Attachment 6 Mum% 4 H1GN W 0 ,•• sr- `Wdp IS 4Af ` a Cr Q MAJOR WATERSHED DIVIDE ' I INTERIOR WATERSHED DIVIDES 42 4AF PROPOSED STORM SEWER 3AF EXISTING STORM SEWER 04 ( OPEN CNANN E L ._ STORM WATER .STORAGE AREA - INUNDATION AREA STORAGE AREA VOLUME i°f DISCHARGE IN CFS CITY LIMITS : ::• : :•: • : ::: :•::: t 1 s OAF See Property Line r p y Map on Page 5 C6, Ir r4 2 ,0 r t r de 12 AF 91' dIP r,1 ' 240 21 (122300 41Y5 ZAFr2 1 f t ! 6 I • AF 9 f _ ZAr ` 1 1Af 4AF Ir _F Ar 2AF See Property Line Q. Map on Page 4 f. Q Z N 90 AF - Lu z W KE • : :..::.: - : r:. :.... • ......... .... ........ ....... ... ... s. DRAINAGE PLAN t 10 Attachment 7 4 N 1 211 7 = ON-a* IN Ir 3 . 0 1 A, Ole. 1 on page 9 I -C. I I z DRAINAGE PLAN EXCERPTS 11 Attachment 8 r Y z i r RPENTEUR ........ .: :::. aaaaaa .• aaa as aaa as ,. ` •• See Property Line Ma P on Page MAJOR WATERSHED DIVIDE • — INTERIOR WATERSHED DIVIDES PROPOSED STORM SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER ---- - - - - -- OPEN CHANNEL --- STORM WATER STORAGE AREA INUNDATION AREA STORAGE AREA VOLUME 4 4F _ DISCHARGE IN CFS CITY LIMITS .........:....... 4 N Pursuant to .due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the cityYcounciloftheCityofMaplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of , 1985 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has determined that the following-described tax - forfeited land is required for purposes:drainage urgP P Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 7, King's Addition to the city of St. Paul,Ramsey Co. Minnesota Code Nos. 57- 41500 - 010 -07; 57- 41500 - 020 -07, and 57- 41500- 030 -07. WHEREAS, the above acquisition would be consistent within the city'scomprehensiveplan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proper city officials be and hereby are authorized to make an application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land for drainage purposes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution and application for conveyance of said tax- forfeited land in the office of the land commissioner. Adopted this day of , 1985. Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefullycomparedtheattachedandforegoingextractofminutesofaregularmeetingoftheCityofMaplewood, held on the day of , 1985, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full true and completettherefrom full, c p ete transcri p erefrom insofar as the same relates to this request for conveyance of tax - forfeited lands. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1985. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota A ++ ae -hmont 4 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of , 1985 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has determined that the following - described tax- forfeited land is required for drainage purposes: Lot 4, Block 7, King's Addition to the City of St. Paul, Code No. ' 57- 41500 - 040 -57. WHEREAS, the above acquisition would be consistent within the city's comprehensive plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proper city officials be and hereby are authorized to make an application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land for drainage purposes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution and application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land in the office of the land commissioner. Adopted this day of , 1985* Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MA PL EWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1985, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this request for conveyance of tax - forfeited lands, Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1985. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 13 Attachment 10 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the citycounciloftheCityofMaplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of , 1985 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has determined that the following - described tax - forfeited land is required for street and utility purposes:ur oses: Outlot A, King's Addition to the City of St. Paul, Ramsey County,Minnesota, Code No. 57- 41500 - 010 -09. WHEREAS, the above acquisition would be consistent within the city'scomprehensiveplan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT , RESOLVED, that the proper city. officials be and hereby are authorized to make an application for conveyance of said tax- forfeited land for street and utility purposes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution and application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land in the office of the land commissioner. Adopted this day of , 1985* Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meetingoftheCityofMaplewood, held on the day of , 1985, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this request for conveyance of tax - forfeited lands. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal the city this day of , 1985. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota Attarhmant 11 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of , 1985 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has determined that the following- described tax - forfeited land is required for drainage purposes: Lot 25, Block 3, Maplecrest, Code No. 57- 48900- 250 -03. WHEREAS, the above acquisition would be consistent within the city's comprehensive plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proper city officials be and hereby are authorized to make an application for conveyance of said tax forfeited land for drainage purposes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution and application for conveyance of said tax- forfeited land in the office of the land commissioner. Adopted this day of , 1985e Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MA PL EWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1985, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this request for conveyance of tax - forfeited lands. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal__ of the city this day of , 1985. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota Attachment 12 15 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof. a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of , 1985 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has determined that the following - described tax - forfeited land is required for drainage purposes: Vacated street south of the adjoining and following: Part lying Northeasterly of the extended Northeasterly line of Lot 13 and Southwesterly of the extended Northeasterly line of Lot 12 of Lot 10 Block 3, Maplecrest Code No. S7- 48900- 103 -03. WHEREAS, the above acquisition would be consistent within the city's comprehensive plan. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,, that the proper city officials be and hereby are authorized to make an application for conveyance of said tax- forfeited land for drainage purposes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution and application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land in the office of the land commissioner. Adopted this day of , 19 8 5 . Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS . CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned , being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meetingoftheCityofMaplewood, held on the day of , 1985, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this request for conveyance of tax-forfeited lands, Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal_ of the city this day of , 19859 City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 16 Attachment 13 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of , 1985 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has determined that the following - described tax- forfeited land is required for street and utility purposes: North 30 feet of Block One, Dearborn Park. Code No. 57- 22000- 010 -01. WHEREAS, the above acquisition would be consistent within the city's comprehensive plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proper city officials be and hereby are authorized to make an application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land for street and utility purposes: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution and application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land in the office of the land commissioner. Adopted this day of , 1985. Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MA PL EWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1985, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this request for conveyance of tax - forfeited lands. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1985. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota Attachment 14 1 7 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of , 1985 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has determined that the following- described tax- forfeited land is required for drainage purposes: Subject to pipeline easement, Lot Seven, Block One, Wakefield Manor, Ramsey County, Minnesota, Code No: 57- 80800 - 070 -010 WHEREAS, the above acquisition would be consistent within the city's comprehensive plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proper city officials be and hereby are authorized to make an application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land for drainage-purposes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution and application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land in the office of the land commissioner. Adopted this day of , 19859 Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS . CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1985, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and completep transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this request for conveyance of tax-- forfeited lands. _ Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal -of the city t h i s day of , 1985. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota Attachment 15 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the citycounciloftheCityofMaplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of ,1985 at 7 p.m. c The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the C i ty of Maplewood has de term i ned that the following - described tax - forfeited land is required for drainage purposes: The North 160 feet of the South 450 feet of the East 300 feet of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 18, Township 29 Range 22. Code No.: 57- 01810- 010 -86. WHEREAS, the above acquisition would be consistent within the city's comprehensive plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proper city officials be and hereby are authorized to make an application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land for drainage purposes; . and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution and application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land in the office of the land commissioner; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the balance of the property may be sold. Adopted this day of , 19859 Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY } SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1985, with the original on f i l e in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this - .request for conveyance of tax - forfeited lands. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1985* City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota Attachment 16 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of , 1985 at 7 p.m. 4 The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Ramsey County by. resolution dated October 15, 1984, classified as nonconservation land, certain land lying within the limits of the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, a copy of the classification resolution together with a list of the land classified has been submitted for approval of the classification in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Annotated, Section 282.01, sub. 1; and WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has determined that the following - described tax - forfeited land is required for drainage purposes: Outlot A Maple Greens lst Addition. Code No: 57- 48950- 010 -040 WHEREAS, the above acquisition would be consistent within the city's comprehensive plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said classification of the above - described land as nonconservation land is hereby approved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the proper city officials be and hereby are authorized to make an application for conveyance of Outlot A Maple Greens 1st Addition for drainage purposes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution and application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land in the office of the land commissioner* Adopted this day of , 1985. Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of _ , 1985, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this xequest for conveyance of tax - forfeited lands. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1985. City Clerk C i tv of Man1 Pwood . Minnesota Attachment 17 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood Minnesota, was duly called Al and held in the council chambers is said city on the day of 1985, at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the,. Board of County Commissioners of Ramsey County by Resolution dated October 15, 1.984, classified as nonconservation land, certain land lying within the limits of the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has determined that retention of Outlot C, Maple Greens 1st Addition (Code No. 57- 48950 - 010 -06) would not serve a public purpose, it does not comply with the requirements for development and should be combined with adjoining developed properties for side and rear yard usage. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said classification of the above- described land as nonconservation land is hereby approved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the above - described parcel be withheld from sale by auction for one year, during `which time the Maplewood Housing and Redevelopment Authority will pursue the enactment of a tax - forfeit land transfer program to dispose of substandard parcels to adjoining property owners. Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS CITY OF MAPLEWOOD } I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of. a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of 1985, with the original on file in my office, _ and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to tax - forfeited lands. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 19859 City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 21 Attachment 18 MEMORANDUM 00 1 TO: City Manager Action by Council: FROM: Director of Community Development B Amen ment - -M -1 and M -2 Districts EndorBe SUSUBJECT: Code d DATE: June 11, 1985 Modif i ed.,,,,,_.,,,,,,, ReJecte Date Request Amend the code to increase the distance from a residential district that a conditional use permit is required for building in an M -1, light manufacturing or M -2, heavy manufacturing district. Reasons for the Reauest Code requires a conditional use permit for a building or use in-an M -1 district, within 200 feet of a residential district or within 250 feet in an M -2 district. The proposed amendment would change both to 350 feet. The existing distances may not always be adequate to protect residential areas. The state legislature recognized a similar problem several years ago when they amended the planning act to increase the required distance for hearing notices on rezoni ngs from 200 to 350 feet. Recommendation Approve the enclosed ordinance. jw Enclosure ORDINANCE NO, AN.ORDINANCE INCREASING THE DISTANCE YROM A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IN AN M -1 OR M -2 DISTRICT Section 1. Section 36- 187(b) of the M -1 district is amended as follows additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): b) No b u i l d i n g or exterior use, except parking., abal-I be erected, altered or conducted within 350 two- bendred feet of a residential district without a conditional use permit. Section 2. .Section 36 -202 of the M -2 district is amended as follows: additions underlined and deletions are crossed out): ' Sec. 36 -202. Minimum distances for building and use from a residential re 4denee district. No building or exterior use, except parking, 4n- afi- M- 2- HeaYy Manufaeter4ng 94str4et4n- the - e4ty may be erected, altered or conducted used and- ne pert4en of aeter4ng D4str4et - 4n - the-e4ty - may be -used, within 3 50 twe- bvndred -f 4f ty -2bA4 feet of a residential rea4denee district without a conditional use permit w4th4n- the- e4ty -- a *eept- aa- autber4eed by perm4t--49sded the e4ty eeene44, Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by . the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this day of , 1985. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Ayes-- Nays-- RAMSEY- WASHINGTON COUNTIES SUBURBAN L CABLE COMMISSION 3401 CENTURY AVENUE NORTH SUITE 3070 WHITE BEAR LAKE, MINNESOTA 551 10 612 -779- O Aotion by Council: M E M 0 R A N D M0 Endorse ______.,._..._... Mo d i f i e d,.,._..._.:._ To: City Man Admin Rejecteygstratos, and Clerks Date From: Benjamin Selisker Date: June 27, 1985 RE: Joint Powers Agreement Amendment File: 85 -50 During its June session, the Commission requested its member cities to consider the attached resolution amending section 4, article VI of the Joint Powers Agreement. This amendment would streamline the commission's ability to handle its financial matters and I encourage its approval. Please place this resolution on the agenda of your next council meeting and return the signed form to the commission office at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. cc t RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED, that Article W Section 4 of the JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT OF THE RAMSEY /WASH INGTON COUNTIES SUBUItW CABLE DOMMISSION be amended as lollares Section 4. Treasurer. The Treasurer shall have custody of the Commission's tunda, shall pay its bills, shall 'keep its financial records and generally conduct the financial affairs of the Commission and for such other matters as shall be dsldted to him by the Commission. as lqw r. In .conducting the Commission's financial affairs, the Treasurer shall, at all times, act in accordance with generally accepted accounting prin- ciples. Treasurer's reports, 'including any bills or cl&ias to be acted upon by the Comnissfon, shall be distributed to all Direc- tors not less than five (S) days prior to the meeting* The Treasurer shall post a fidelity bond or other insuranc* .: amount approved by the Conu4ission. The Ccto sio , ehal ,tea[ Ahe coat of the bond or .insurance. Passed "and Adopted this day of 1985. C i ty of Signature ai y p. IN CITI June 26, 1985 Barry Evans , City Manager City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Ave. Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Evans: Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Building Seventh and Robert Streets St. Paul,, Minnesota 55101 Telephone (612) 291 -6359 Action by Council: Endorsed......_.. Nodifie ReJ ecte - Date Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) has invited Metro HRA to apply forfundsappropriatedbytheStateLegislatureforPhaseIIIoftheRehabilitationLoanProgram* This program ti on g provides deferred payment loans to low- income home-owners to make improvements affecting safety, energy improvementaccessibility, and habitability of their homes. Metro HRA administers theprograminRamseyCountycommunities (except St . . Paul When the program began in 1982, your city council approved a resolutionauthorizingMetroHRAtoapplyfortheMHFAfundsandadministertheprogramwithinyourcity. Since that time , we have administered to $56, 220 to assistlow- income homeowners .in 11 your community to make improvements to their homes. In order to complete our application for the Phase III fundin wg a again need aresolutionauthorizingyourcommunity's participation in the program. I haveenclosedasampleresolutionsuchastheonethatwasreviouslPyapprovedbyyourcitycouncil. Also enclosed is a summary of the ro ram.p g Since Metro HRAmustsubmititsapplicationtoMHFAbytheendofJuly, we would appreciateyourhelpingettingtheresolutionscheduled (and approved) and the earliestpossiblecouncilmeeting. If you have questions or if I can be of any assistance lease ca291 - 65040 P 11 me at Sincerely, Z1( Laurie Garfield Supervisor Program Services Metro HRA enc is . LG/ j1 An Equal Opportunity Employer MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY REHABILITATION LOAN PROGRAM I. General Description The Minnesota -Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) Rehabilitation Loan Program provides deferred payment loans to low income homeowners for housing improvements directly affecting the safety., habit- ability, energy efficiency and accessibility of their homes. (A deferred payment loan (Def erred Loan) is a loan which need not be repaid unless the borrower sells, transfers, or ceases to live in the improved property within ten years of the date of the loan. After the ten -year period expires, the loan is forgiven.) The program was . created in 1981 to replace the Agency's Home Improvement Grant Program, Accessibility Program, and Emergency Energy Conversation Grant Program, and is entering its third phase. The program is I primarily funded through appropriations from the State Legislature. -The funding level for the 1985 -87 program phase will be $8 million. These funds are distributed statewide through local housing and redevelopment authorities, community action agencies, and other nonprofit organizations known as Administering Entities. II. Program Eligibility Applicants' must meet four eligibility criteria in order to qualify for this program. They are as follows: 11 The applicant's household must have an adjusted gross income of $7,000. or less. Adjusted income is calculated by taking the gross income (including all public assistance payments) of all members of the household, age 18 or over, and deducting from that amount $1,000 per person. MHFA may also allow an extra deduction for extraordinary medical costs. . 2. The applicant must own the property to be improved and it must be his /her principal place of residence. 3. The gross value of the applicant's assets (excluding the property to be improved and two surrounding acres) cannot exceed $25,000. _-- 333 Sibley Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 (612) 296.7608 Equal Opportunity Housing and Equal Opportunity Employment 5 t j i RESOLUTION REQUESTING 'THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL HRA TO APPLY FOR AND IMPLEMENT A REHABILITATION LOAN PROGRAM WITHIN THE CITY OF WHEREAS, the City of desires to assist low income homeowners in repairs to .p their forthepurposeofcorrectingdefectsaffectingdirectlythesafethabitability,Y, billty,ener gy.conservation, or accessibility of the property; and, WHEREAS, the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency has funds to be used forsuchpurposes, and will accept applications from housing and redevelopment Re Loan Program funds; authorities desiring to administer these p and, WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has been duly organized pursuant toMinnesotaStatutes1976, Section 473.123 and has all of the powers and dutiesofahousingredevelopmentauthoritypursuanttoMinnesotaStat1976473.193 under the provisions of the Municipal Housing and RedevelopmentP Act,Minnesota Statutes 1976., Sections 462. 11 to 462.711, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Metropolitan Council is herebyrequestedtoincludetheCityofinanapplicationforstateRehabilitationLoanProgramfunds, and that the city administrator is hereby authorized to enter into any necessaryagreementwiththeMetropolitanCouncilforoperatingtheProgramwithin thecity. . Adopted this day of 985 Mayor City Administor 42_? LAIS, BANNIGAN &KELLY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 5TH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 DONALD L. LAIS JOHN F. BANNIGAN. JR. PATRICK J. KELLY June 21, 1985 AREA CODE 612 224.3781 Action by Council: Mr. Barry Evans City Manager 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Barry: Endorse Kodif i e Reecte Dat e I am herewith enclosing a copy of the statement I received from Mr. Mogren on Countryview Golf Course for the placement of the nets on the course in the total amount of $9,686.49. I had received this bill earlier, but had no supporting bills to go along with it. I am now sending copies of bills along with this letter. I have worked out a tenative agreement with Mr. Mogren in which he will settle for a contribution by the City of one -half -the amount or $4,843.25. In exchange for that payment, the City is to obtain a full settlement as to any costs of maintenance or future installation of screens for protection of Beam Avenue from flying golf balls. I would ask that you have the Council approve this Agreement and .send the check payable to Country View Golf Course, Inc. and Gerald C. Mogren and Arlene H. Mogren, his wife, Gordon E. Kindlien and Florence Kindlien, his wife. I will have them execute the agreement releasing us from any further liability for the construction of Beam and any further liabilities arising out of the agreement made the 1st of October, 1973 between these parties and the then contract for deed holder by the name of Victor R. Fitch and LaVonne Fitch. Very truly yours, BANNIG N LY, P.A. onald L. Lais DL:cg Enclosure COUNTRY VIEW GOLF COURSE, Inc. 2950 Maplewood Drive • Saint Paul, Minnesota 55109 ii mac.. t L.L / / f ! L.L -. G` 0c i L/Y/ IL j 1 :.. .7e , lam' " L- t r — G ! v J . • t5 G . GG 55'• is 7.5 0 0 f • M ACC.:oONT NUM13ER El 4o816 SOLD F Tt1 COUNTRY VIEW COL F COURSE 2926 N. hwy. . 6 STe PAUL., M 55 amm GOLF SUPPLY CO., INC. IVI 9 /8 - . 1'1 3650 AVONDALE • CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 64618 Phone (Area Code 312) 463 -2636 r TSHIPPED TO P e oL # i t O DS 612=-77Q PLEASE RETURN DUPLICATE COPY OZ REFER TO s THIS INVOICE NO. WHEN MAKING REMITTANCE. W. 111 CUSTOMER'S OFt.,"ERi i;J.SALESMAN VIA 11*4 2n. 1 0 INVOTE CO3. c0 c. SHIPPED VIA E.O.B NO PKG'S TERMS 2 t i ' J . ' . f ' ', . r ' . i .. 'h 1 7wU •+W'.•.,,r T 1 t • Z ; .1. Jl Y.".'V..7r± ++......vr.P!_,I f. ......sf ,.r.r ` -' .. .. .. '' ,7p y,. • ••.t. i7 fy. °`l {•-,'; '• ri•' t= . ii ``, u••i ;Zl•"1 i rtifil' ri- L4.a:r..vie_•..._.. __. _. _ .. . e - _. _ .. .. 1` 4- RL.S . GF/2-1 rO BA U CA RR f ER NE_ T T # NG 2 xJ J r I 5103 4 4 000 Ic0C 0 C •`19co ko merchandise on this invoice is returnsblo wnItss claim it, made within 3D days from date and permission granted for such return. No private branded goods may be returned at any time. To insure prompt handling of complaint, show invoice number of shipment on all correspondence.Interest charged on past due items. r • •- .. _ - •V .r•- r -... •yr•rr.w.t u.w •Ay.... -. ra.. 7. ....`., r-a .. - -...ti . -r4.w -- • /•... .. rK +frD = .aM.. ,r• .... ,-. r•• ^• "j •fin +.. i. • ... Ki i ..:wR:r: aL w° A,e •' ...•.-1" .' M. Yie.. •` Wt' r" i1• VRI r•• o ++'rlw..i ......r.r »• ••.r . --.- r - .' •• • .•. .N•' ••..- ••`••• . { •a • •- •. v• -•. ;S'.ter. • _.•._s { .(. •.•ss - • •r•,rr •=.r. - T•. • •. i'r • ' •.•. .l -. .r: w . : : .., - • • •. •. i•sw •.'• .i.i - 'a; . - - - 1 r: DONOVAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1080 MONTREAL. AVENUE SAI PAUL, MINNESOTA 461 690 --1761 511 BiLLTO Ci)UhITRY VIEW GOLF COURSE W NORTH HIGHWAY 61 14AP .EWOOD, NN. 7 -1 1 55 109 SHIP TO MUNTRY VIEW GOLF CCXUR5E 2962 NORTH HIGHWAY 51 MAPLEWOOD, MN. 53 109 PURCHASE ORD R SAL SMAN INVOICE NO. /DATE TERMS CUSTOMER NO. 1 11 651 11 /30/si NET 30 }AYE 1152 QUANTITY ITEM NO.DESCRIPTION CODE PRICE EXTENSION 30 FURNISH, SET, ! FRAME 9 POLES 576090{ GUY ANCHORS SUBTOTAL 5760* 04 SALES TAX SHIPPING / HANDLING PAY THIS AMOUNT 376Oo O COPY TWO I/L7: W mum=== no_: IOiOlve1 mim medmj mimm nommmmmmmmm mm mmmmmmmm NMI I= NMI AM NS'TRUCTION CCL TAKE- F S EET _ ESTIMATE li to aC47 7 AZ Foam 160 NO. SHEET No. DATE: 400000 - 2 ( 3 "' k QQUAN- TITY LL WW pp v .ct 1 v c f RELEASE The undersigned, Gerald C. Mogren and Arlene H. Mogren, his wife and Gorden E. Kindlien and Florence Kindlien, his wife and Country View Golf Center, Inc., a Minnesota corporation and /or Country View Golf Course, Inc. hereby acknowledge receipt of the payment of Four Thousand Eight Hundred Forty Three and 25/100 ($4,843.25) Dollars to them in hand paid by the City of Maplewood. In consideration of the payment of said money, the undersigned do hereby release and fully discharge the City of Maplewood of any further liability by reason of that certain Agreement dated the 1st day of October, 1973 between the then Village of Maplewood, Victor R. Fitch and I. LaVonne Fitch and Gerald C. Mogren and Arlene Mogren, Gordon E. Kindlien and Florence Kindlien and Country View Golf Center, Inc. and in particular release and discharge the City from any further liability under Paragraph 9 of the aforesaid Agreement. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD In Presence of: Its Mayor Its Clerk Seal) In Presence of: Gerald C. Mogren Arlene H. Mogren In Presence of: Gordon E. Kindlien Florence Kindlien COUNTRY VIEW GOLF CENTER, INC. In Presence of: Its President Tt e V i r , A Proci rl An t STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) On this day of , 1985, before me, a Notary Public, within and for said County, personally appeared John C. Greavu and Lucille E. Aurelius, to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn, did say that they are respectively the Mayor and Clerk of the City of Maplewood named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said City and that said instrument was signed and sealed on behalf of said City by authority of its City Council and that they executed the same as the free act and deed of the City of Maplewood. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA} ss COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) On this day of , 1984, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Gerald C. Mogren and Arlene H. Mogren, husband and wife, to me known to be the persons described in, and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) On this day of , 1984, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Gordon E. Kindlien and Florence Kindlien, husband and wife, to me known to be the persons described in, and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) On this day of 1985, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared and to me personally known, who being each by me duly sworn, they did say that they are respectively the President and Vice President of the Country View Golf Center, Inc., named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said Country View Golf Center, Inc., and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said Country View Golf Center, Inc., by authority of its Board of Directions and said and acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said Country View Golf Center, Inc. Notary Public z 8 LAIS, BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 5TH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 DONALD L. LAIS JOHN F. BANNIGAN, JR. PATRICK J. KELLY July 1, 1985 Lotion by C EAdor Kodif ied-.. -_— R* acteA Date AREA CODE 612 224 -3781 Mr. Barry Evans City Manager 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Barry: Re: Estate of Stanley H. Wessen Lecon Properties, Inc. I am enclosing a copy of a letter dated Tune 26, 1985 together with a copy of the proposal submitted by the attorneys for the Wessen estate. I have a call in to Mr. Fortney and will call you after hearing from him. Obviously, the City taxpayers are taking a loss on the compromise as it is presently set out and in addition to that the fact that a substantial portion of the same taxpayers are within the school district. It occurred to me that the only people really benefiting from the City agreeing-to compromise on the assessment would be the County as a whole. We do not have a legal obligation to enter into such a compromise. Our assessment is good and I believe that the Letter David Busch of the Fredricksen firm wrote recognizes a need to payoff the assessment as it is an obligation for payment of bonds. The above are just my initial reactions to the proposal and are not intended to be a recommendation. Very truly yours, 0onaBANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. ld L. Lais DL:cg Enclosure TOM FOLEY COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY R"SEY COUNTY SUITE 400 350 ST. PETER STREET ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 June 26, 1985 Mr. Donald Lais Attorney at Law Midwest Federal Building St. Paul, MN 55102 Re Estate of It. Stanley Wessin /Lecon Properties Inc. Dear Mr. Lais: Enclosed you will find a letter and supporting documentation received by the County Attorney's Office under date of June 17, 1985 from the attorney for the above reference taxpayers. The letter contains a settlement proposal relating to delinquent taxes owed on a parcel of property located within the city of Maplewood. The property has been approved for sale out of the bankruptcy courts free and clear of all liens and judgments, including delinquent taxes. Any payment of would be made from proceeds of the sale. The proceeds of the sale are far less than the amount of claims pending against' the proceeds. As you can see, the estate-is prepared to make a settlement of the delinquent taxes. The estate is offering $528,.000 in cash in con j unction Ali th ' a commitment to pay all future. special assessments. The estate's proposal was presented to the Finance .Committee of the Ramsey County Board of Commissioner on June 24, 19 5' At that meeting the _ was raised whether the city of Maplewood is rep d moo_ com romise the special in conjunction with the compromise of general property taxes by Ramsey County. - I have been instructed to submit the proposal received from the estate to you in your capacity as city attorney for the city Maplewood and request that you present this_ proposal to the City Council. Basically, the county would like to see the city ag to compromise the special assessments proportionately with the compromise of general property-taxes. TELEPHONE 612) 298 -3421 ID j 1 j Mr . Lai s h ' June 25, 1985 Page Two Please let me know the feelings of the city of Maplewood as soon as possible. As you can see, the closing on this property is contemplated for on or about July 1, 1985. It is anticipated that the County will accept the settlement proposal, accept the $528,000 and then hold the proceeds pending an agreement on distribution with the city. Yours truly, DAVID FO RTNEY DF:dlr Enclosure CC: Pat Kelly L t FRE DRIK SOS' & BYRON A PROfE SiONAL ASS CLIMON 1LAROLD M..*W.DRJKSM it:BERTRAW GRY_E-%FR vPLLS J %%WC2 rr WARREN R. %L &.Ca f?iY.tiSNER fGttti L..PONF.its StiI:F'TFLn vt ST C?L&JUX S F. DWASNER eq P. BYRON Qves7L T jRLtiSOti EARL F. C0Lh0RN. jR• 7TN(7 IN M. M,A I;Y AERTLN'A.RISDEF.JR. JAMES R.fLUAF.R JOIF 1 M. PALJ61ER ROBERT H. ZALX CHARD R. ".MNSEti LEO G. STERN JEROME B. PV- DFRSO.%FREDF_RKX E. MCH ROARRT G. VVERER Tt KAI AS W. CLUtTON ROBERT P. SA.ti'DS DOASON v6EST KEfTH A. IIBREY O+V A. SATOM TERYNCE M. FRLTTH WC2LkEL A STSR..V ALBERT AA'DREWS.JR.N7.n. A. WMIKART THOMAS R. Kr%;G.U.11A.t1 J. BRODY H. STOITT JOKN f{. MERKLE LES L SARA= THG:SMS S FRA.SER 1100 INTERNATIONAL CENTRE 900 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 35402 TELEX 290569 FREDRIKSON NIPS TELECOPIER (612) 347 -7077 TELEPHONE (6 12) 347 -7000 WRITER 9S DIRECT DIAL 347 -7031 June 17, 1985 tiff A. CMMSTAD RIC S. ANDERSON DAVID R. BUSCII DAVID C. IrMORL.'D JACK r. MEL_ws KOXRAD J. FRMDEN 1.. MY J. BP.RG 01 fn J. E R} A" ATtILEEN A.fiI:OHES JOIN Iii. xoEC.x ROBERT 1. RMNS. JR. PALL L. LA \DRY TED S. MHDCIE ANDREW I. COMTER 1 GUL&EL R. KROL.L PATRICIA A.BETTHO.` 1AX> AE L A. TRrrTZrO SCS4Y SIIWFIER ENLOW Lf%'DA C. SCHWARTZ A. %1Es a. PENT PETER H. THE %M i DAVID r. BUNDE W%0A : WMES E. VAIN VALKENMURG CMEGORI' P. x UH01 SH.RON K. FREIER Mr, David M. Fortney Esq, Ramsey County Attorney's Office 4th Floor, Lowry Medical Arts Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Re Estate of H. Stanley Wessin /Lecon Properties, Inc. Dear Mr. Fortney: KRJS'TI L. Ak E SON. ROBERT K. PL04LU MAL, a. MORCIIN 7H0%C %S E. HOFMA MARY S. RA LNI LARRY D. HAUSE H. BRUCE %o` OFQEN C N'TO\ E. C[.TLER RANDY A. E VAN5 SHEVA J. WJ% - DERS This letter will c my formal proposal on behalf of two taxpayers, the estate of H. Stanley Wessin, deceased, and Lecon Properties, InOe, tha Ramsey County compromise certain real estate taxes (in' .1nding special assessments, penalties and interest) with relspect to certain •undeveloped real. property located in Maplewood, Minnesota. Attached to this letter are a niiirber of exhibits describing the property and the en- cumbrances on stich property. I believe you will find these - exhibits helpful. in considering this proposal. Some background on this matter may also be helpful. Mr. H. Stanley Wessin began acquiring the property described on Exhibit A (herei nzi f ter "Property ") perhaps fifteen years ago. He acquired some of the in his own name and some of the Property in the name.of Lecon Properties (here- inafter "Lecon "), a corporation of which he was the sole shareholder. For many years, Mr. Wessin unsuccessfully at- tempted to construct a commercial development on the Property. The Property remains entirely vacant to this date. Mr. Wessin died in October, 1982, shortly after the holder of a mortgage on a portion of the Property sold it at a fore- closure sale. In October, 1983, Lecon filed for protection from_ its creditors in the United States . Bankruptcy Court. Since that time, there has been considerable litigation as to the validity of certain claims against the Property. There is a myriad of lien claims against the Property, totaling in. excess of $2,100,000, and described on Exhibit I. For some 0 f- Mr, David M. Fortney, Esq.. Page 2 June 17, 1985 detail on these claims, I have attached as Exhibit K the en- cumbrance section of title commitment No. C15619, prepared by Title Services, Inc., which consists of some nine pages of claims against the Property. In addition to the lien claims, there are approximately $550,000 of unsecured claims against Lecon and Estate of H. Stanley Wessin and the Property cons - titutes substantially all of the assets which will be avail - able for such creditors. Further complicating the situation is the fact that a portion of the Property is about to be platted. You will find on Exhibit A a copy of the existing plat showing each parcel of Property, including a reference number for each parcel which will allow cross - reference to other exhibits showing taxes and special assessments with respect to each such parcel. on Ex- hibit B, I have provided a copy of proposed plat of Maple Ridge Mall. On Exhibit C, I have provided an overlay of the proposed plat of Maple Ridge Mall over the existing plat of the Property showing which portions of the Property will be platted. We have recently negotiated sales of portions of the Property. On Exhibit D, I have provided a rough outline of the portions of the property subject to - eacheach of the three sales. The sales are referenced as the "G.M.C. First Sale ", the "G.M.C. Second Sale" and the "Mogren Sale ". The G.M.C. First Sale provides for a purchase price. of $1,074,500 and is set to close on July 1 1985. The Mogren Sale provides for a purchase price of $70,000 and is scheduled to close on July 1, 1985. The G.M.C. Second Sale is an option providing for a current purchase price of $312,000 and providing that the holder of the option has until August, 1986 to exercise the option. Thus, the total purchase price for the Property currently subject to agreement is $1,456,500, of which there is a reasonably high likelihood that $1,145,000 will be received on or about July 1, 1985. The property subject to these sale agreements constitutes the most valuable portion of the Property as it includes all of the White Bear Avenue frontage. You will note on Exhibit D, that the property immediately west of the property subject to the G.M.C. First Sale is subject to an approxi- mately 300 foot wide drainage easement which obviously renders the property valueless for any development. The remainder of the Property is not, in the aggregate, expected to generate sales proceeds more than a small portion of that to be generated by the properties currently subject to sale agreements._ In g r . f Mr. David M. Fortney, Esq.. Page 3 June 17, 1985 fact, you will note in Exhibit F that the assessor's total estimated market value of Parcels 1, 11 and 10 is only about 130,000. The only other portion of the Property remaining not subject to sales agreements is the westerly portion of Parcel 4 which, because of the previously mentioned drainage easement, does not have a great deal of usable land. On Exhibit F, I have scheduled the special assessments on the Property. You will note that the total sum is $625,000, of which approximately $313,000 has been certified to real estate taxes and of which approximately $312,000 is not due until future years. You will note on Exhibit F that the assessor's estimated market value for all parcels of Property is approxi- mately $1,830,000. This means that special assessments applied to this Property exceed one -third of the current estimated fair market value of the Property and if special assess- ments are presumed to have increased the value of the Property by a substantial portion of the amount of such special assess- ments, then the proportion of the special assessments to the unimproved value of the Property is close to one -half. On Exhibit G, there is a summary of the delinquent real estate taxes affecting the Property (further details of these taxes is set forth in Exhibit B) You will note that the total of all current and delinquent real estate taxes with respect to the Property is approximately $808,000. I f one adds to this the future installments of special assessments, the total out- standing tax burden on the Property is approximately $1,120,000. This is almost 60% of the total assessor's estimated market value of the Property. Based on the existing sales, it would appear _that the assessor's estimated market value i.s " relatively close to market value. I propose that the tax burden on the Property is excessive and some relief should be granted. We acknowledge that we have not followed the conventional methods of protesting taxes and special assessments; however, I urge that consideration be given to the untimely death of Mr. Wessin, the bankruptcy of Lecon, and the litigation concerning the mortgage fore- closure sale. Furthermore, it appeared to me to be more appropriate to request the County's consideration of a com- promise when we are in a position to immediately substanti- ally or entirely pay a compromised amount. The Bankruptcy Court has ordered that the portions of the Property subject to the sales agreements described above shall be sold free and clear of all liens with the liens then attached to the proceeds to be distributed upon further order of the Court. As is indicated a 1 i r' L t f FREDRIKSON & BYRON, P.A. Mr . David M. For tney , Esq. Page 4. June 14. , 1985 in Exhibit I, the total of all claims far exceed the current sales proceeds and perhaps the entire fair market value of the Property. If the creditors holding the most significant liens are willing to compromise their claims, there is. a significant probability that the compromised amounts can be paid, in cash, shortly after July 1, 1985. A number of the other lien claimants have compromised their claims already on the condition that they be paid the compromised amount on or about July 1, 19850 The State of Minnesota has a secured tax claim in the amount of $150,000 and has offered to compromise this at 70 %,-equal to, $100, 000, if it is paid on or about July 1, 1985. Union Bank and Trust Company has agreed to compromise its secured claim of $340,000 at approximately 82% of that amount, which equals $280,000, North Midge Care Center has agreed-to com- promise its secured claim o:' $440 approximately $375,000. A number of smaller secured claimants have agreed to compromises ranging from 30% of the claim to i.n excess -of 60% of the claim. At this time, it a ppeci - s somewhat unlikely that the ,Property will gene rate erneti g h net sales proceeds to pay any significant portion of the unsecured claims against the estate of H. Stanley Wessin and Lecon, which claims are approximately $550,000. I propose that the County compromise these taxes by reducing the total outstanding tax burden by 25 %. As indicated on Exhibit G, the total outstanding tax burden is approximately $1,120,00010 This would constitute a reduction in the tax burden of $280,000, leaving $840,00 of the tax burden remaining. we propose that the future installments of special assessments be . left intact at the current ainount of $312,000, If this amount is subtracted from the remaining tax burden of $840,000, this would require a present tax payment of $528,000. If this proposal is acceptable, the County s: - Iou ld receive cash in the, amount of $528,000 on or about July 1, 1985. You will note that this proposal fully protects payment of the special assessments. The future installments of special assessments will remain in place. (It should be noted that the purchaser.of the G.M.C. First Sale Property intends to construct a substantial commercial development and will thus be in position to service the future installments of special assessments.) As indicated on Exhibit G, the portion of the delinquent taxes which special asses p assessments is approximately $315,000 and the amount proposed to be paid is approximately $210,000 in excess of the unpaid special assess- ments. Y '.III a O FREDRIKSON & BYRON, P.A. Mr. David M. Fortney, Esq. Page 5 June 14, 1985 If the County accepts this proposal, we will waive any right to challenge in Bankruptcy Court the-amount or priority of such taxes, we will waive the right to claim any fees or expenses from sales proceeds to the extent such action would delay full payment of the County of delinquent taxes, and we will agree that such amount will bear interest.if not paid reasonably promptly after July 1, 1985. In order to expedite the closing of the sales transactions described above, I respectfully request that the County instruct its officials to accept the plat for filing without payment of the delinquent taxes and to accept various deeds for filing without payment of the delinquent taxes. If it is appropriate, I am most willing to appear before the County officials who will consider this proposal. Very truly yours, David R. Busch DRB /mjv Enclosures a* f l 4 i f r LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A - Current Plat Map _ Exhibit B - Proposed Plat of Maple Ridge Mall Exhibit C - Overlay of Proposed Plat Over Current Plat Exhibit D - Description of Properties to be Sold Exhibit E - Cop of'Letter from Mrs. Beatrice P._Backer., concerning amounts of delinquent real estate taxes Exhibit F - Schedule of Special Assessments and Estimated Market Values Exhibit G - Summary of Real Estate Taxes on Property Exhibit H - Detail of Taxes and Assessments on each Parcel of Property Exhibit I - Schedule of Claims against Property Exhibit J - Bankruptcy Schedules of Lecon Properties Exhibit K - Schedule B of Title Commitment showing encumbrances on Property Le- a 47 40 '1 1 G" ; ii ;i Y a 0 - 4-1,- 'si 40OICE MON, WI WI 40- 4. 4m 0 goo t s go- P _ J • 41 Goo., 19 two 01 0 PIIIIIIII MONO ir V. m PO aI A, I I Imp - - i --- -- --- ': - :r 'Z, IWO do of69Opi 0- 000i- -- mvedoik 40 a- MI 6C L I r fo of I I a*I MP I •• 00- qmmm vp sto. of POP StAnL-I L or PIK Q GOO T op SIMI 11 1 -j I r C a , 41. lug TE;tswErl LANE Li .. ILI got 40 It. r SIM 257 Vt Sim lot 6 44 IBM r. 040 MOP Goo. a 7- AL soft I / • ' ' _ x 00 7T"! 71 C% moo M — Page 1 Nam. 0 Existin plat showin Maplewoo W"i-F-LA propert owned b Estate of NI 4POW 01I H. Stanle Wessin/Lecon Properties, Inc.- A •A.• r AVE 110 rJ oh" ANN M f=t OL lob awhile-W 401Ob AMft Its V Lj Phi, f • t41 r • •e w • • + V , : • •• • , s • •• . `.• ' i! K V••'ia•••wT>{" T tea.•• • C j . : 1 - • .. • • = : • _ • iI #LAW% rum irk fo qWW 0 6 f••r to lw r ,.,. , •• Will Z ti s PI too COdab . sob Parle ib 4C- ND 411 sip ` •• •i I7 • • ' • • f f _. t tA 40 L ' r•• • 'r • r • • • • K Skill, IRSILW4L ft e y • • f te. • • • f • /' • •• ••` T_ a f _ :1 _•• dff too, f s era IL Q j w r w .IL N"LOIWT gammas" Sove a 1 s ; ! •' ' _ _' _ " 01, GERVAIS AVENUE ; OB e 543' 30 0 Ira 4111 r n a . M .,es s •r *4 w fts MONO w r It " ! &, r • v • fe • • S f f ail - •- _ • '• •. Proposed plat of Maple Ridge Mall. (approved by City of ap.*J'L o;iooc; L QP I ell 0 1Lf ! - S • -• . • , 1 ' . w ••• ... wr •mow aa.r O •SeeJ7J_ ... ...._ ._....._., t s • i • !2 i 40 mom 1 — -- •—G.J dP yy :I • •r • M R• .o . . ... •. E. ,•• •r„ • j •.ter. moo •; • V . • . • . . • •. 1 ' 1 • L - Y .. w . •.•••...mow ••- -n .... ... ...... r..w_ ••- "i.? " ". . • ' '« i » • w ... of a It GNP doe r Ell . s t _' r • • • • _ 1 I 3 " Z 1iG: Li:.• Cr 1 00 990 5 i'; 7 E R S w E El - C3 Al t ammmmm 41P t , + . ,• IBMti• z "' ,' ' •• k p v • 1 257 Sal lopIto, 0 1 T F do TIVIN 00,0 0 f1•• jolt A ow 5r !*4 1 A r Overlay showing portions of property by Wessin /Lecon which will be part of Maple Ridge Mall. I I L r - — — - or 111111111 a At t 4P Q t r. ..• ....w .u•. err •- -.,* ...- go of .. V ox— O I r.. . • •t.• • . e -. - - • •r. . .*La n- - .. • r r ... .. .rte . 4• man a- r - ow 1 IF V i r V x p Gw 1. •z oo 16 ft 1 •• sp C CIfit so r T , tRS vow EE"T , LANE •••• . _`— C at 2101 V. 257 L qd A VIPlob dr ohm 4 do on am MRS. WOO or r • — _ — — e ., .1 3 0 0' w d a .- r .. - drainage ease o E ! ment crosses Parcel 4. 4 V mow C) I E — g Portions of Maplewood property of r=' Wessin /Lecon subject to sales ;-- ' •j agreements. _ r s • op M 1 1 1 n L. LOU McKENNA Director ROGER viK Asst. Director DIVISON MANAGERS WALTER T. O'MALLEY Property Valuation LEONARD F. OLSON Revenue C. THOMAS OSTHOFF PEGGY RECTOR Records EUGENE H. GIBBONS Property Ownership 0 DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION COUNTY OF RAMSEY 113 -138 COURT HOUSE ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 April 25, 085 David Busch Fredri kson Law Firm 1 International Center 900 2nd Avenue South Mpl s. , MN 55402 RE: H Stanley Wessin Lecon Properties Dear Mr. Busch: Enclosed is the delinquent tax information you requested on the - following parcel s: PAS to i ltsr rte 57- 01110- 080- 40 430 -27 020-30 t P 010-28 49000- 021 -07 022 -06 6 63100 - 040 --02 1 040 -0i If 030 -01 ea Parcel 57- 01110- 010 -29 is now 57- 01110- 030 -29 and the 1984 and prior taxes are paid. The 1984 amount due on each-parcel has been highlight - i n yellow and a tape showi no showing the amount due for all parcels shows a 1984 total of. $18,457.46 and the total for all other years is $458,.059.92. 7 An invoice of the charges for this information is enclosed. Very truly yours, Leonard F. Olson Manager, Revenue Divisi BPB : j eb Enclosures Mrs.) Beatrice P. Backer Supervisor -- Public Services Section EX H j e) F — Page 1 emmom 100 ci LLK - 05/21/85 DRB - 05/23/85 DRB - 06/13/85 r H. STANLEY WESSIN /LECON PROPERTIES INC. ANALYSIS OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS PARCELS SUBJECT TO SALES AGREEMENTS 12 57- 01110- 020 -30 2 57- 01110- 010 -28 4&5 57- 01110 - 080 -40 6 57-49000-021-07 6 57- 49000 - 022 -06 6 57- 01110 - 030 -27 13 57- 01110 -- 030 -29 26 SUBTOTAL* SPECIALS REMAINING SUBSEQUENT TO 1985 TAXES 3,610.00 1,915.50 224,408.58 19.64 138.35 181.8b 1 231.,335.64 N/A, J N/A 10, 0t 244,214.02 1 Property Subject to Sales Agreements: Total of.future and certified special assessments = 475,549.66 EST. PARCELS NOT SUBJECT Asse: SPECIALS PREVIOUSLY Est. CERTIFIED TO TAXES ValuE CERTIFIED TO TAXES N/A 4 , O( N/A 300, O( N/A 1,304,0( N/A 26 N/A 78, 0( N/A, J N/A 10, 0t 244,214.02 1 Property Subject to Sales Agreements: Total of.future and certified special assessments = 475,549.66 EST. PARCELS NOT SUBJECT SPECIALS REMAINING SPECIALS PREVIOUSLY MARK TO SALES AGREEMENTS SUBSEQUENT TO 1985 TAXES CERTIFIED TO TAXES VALU 1 '57-63100-040-.02 N1 P, _35,0 11 57- 63100 - 040 -01 26 N. A.49, C 10 57- 63100 -- 030 -01 25,569,54 N/A 4 6 , C SUBTOTAL:80,418.74 69,710.04 130,C Property Not Subject to Sales Agreements: Total of future and certified special assessments = 150,129.38 TOTAL ALL PARCELS OF FUTURE SPECIALS 311 TOTAL ALL PARCELS OF CERTIFIED SPECIALS 313,924.66 TOTAL ALL PARCELS, ALL FUTURE AND - CERTIFIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 625,679.04 - Page 1 SUMMARY OF TAXES ON PARCELS SUBJECT TO -SALES AGREEMENTS TOTALS Taxes Spec,,P &I TOTALS 1983 & Prior $153,649.18 138,639.42 101,603.90 393,892.50 1984 . 78,11x3.84 56,499e74 24, 600.64 159; 214.22 1985 81,179.82 49,074.86 9,11.7.83 est.]139,372.51 TOTALS . $312,942.84 $244 $135,322.37 $692,479.23 Future Specials $231 335.64 Total Tax Burden on Parcels Subject to Sales Agreements 923,813'.87 Total Assessor's Est. Value of Parcels Subject to Sales Agreements SUMMARY OF TAXES ON PARCELS NOT SUBJECT TO SALES AGREEMENTS Taxes 1983 & Prior $11,528,92 1984 6 1985 6 TOTALS $23,622.92 Future Specials Spec. 36,451.46 17,820.28 15,438.90 69,710.64 P &I 16,193.04 4,362.93 1,503.17 est.] 22,059.14 o Tax Burden on Parcels Remaining Total Assessor's Est, Mkt. Value of Parcels Remaining Total Taxes All Parcels Future Specials All Parcels Total Outstanding Tax Burden All Parcels NOTE: Interest on all parcels on taxes due 1981 -1984 is figured thru 5/31/85 1985 taxes good to 5/15/85; interest will be at 7% to 6/15/85 f s 1,686,000 TOTALS 64,173.42 28,242.19 22,977.09 115,392.70 195,811.44 130,000.00 807,871.93 311,754.38 052185 LK 052385 DRB 061385 DRB 1,119,626.31 NOTE :' See Exhibit F for list of parcels which are subject to sales agree- ments and those which are not subject to sales agreements A A Q rl c x w 12 57- 01110- 020 -30 Taxes Spec. . P&I 1981 1982 1983 151.00 876.72 304.53 1984 169.10 840.62 184.53 1985 173.10 804.52 169.00 TOTALS 493.20 2,521.86 489.06 1 57 - 63100 - 04002 TOTAL DUE:3,504.12 Spec., P&I 1981 6 57 49000 021 - 07 1982 Taxes Spec.P&I 1981 5,689.20 2,045.02 1984 1,615.74 1982 1985 1,611.62 4,731..00 1983 161.68 14.62 61.58 1984 234.84 13.88 45.45 1985 509.68 3.14 TOTALS 906.20 31.64 107.03 TOTAL DUE:1,044.87 13 57- 0.1110- 030 -29 Taxes Spec.P&I 1981 1982 1983 89.30 252.32 PAID 1984 1,262.50 PAID 1985 1,134.68 169.00 TOTALS 1,134.68 169.00 6,471.28 TOTAL DUE:1,303.68 6,175.42 1 57 - 63100 - 04002 2,272.48 Taxes Spec., P&I 1981 1982 1983 1,437.98 5,689.20 2,045.02 1984 1,615.74 5 1.296.61 1985 1,611.62 4,731..00 TOTALS 4,665.34 15,899.44 3 TOTAL DUE: $23,906.41 02 57- 01110 - , 010 -28 Taxes Spec. P &I 11,635.32 429.10 3 13,066.72 412.76 2,463.38 15,008.28 396.38 39,710.32 1,238.24 5,917.24 TOTAL DUE: $46,865.80 a6 57- 49000 - 022 -06 Taxes Spec. P&I 755.44 89.30 252.32 1 84.98 247.29 1,262.50 22.02 3,286.10 196.30 499.61 TOTAL DUE; $3,982.01 11 57 - 63100 - 040 -01 Taxes SUPS:.PBI 1,415.96 595.94 910.76 1 , 734.18 8 , :3213.08 3 , 788.95 2,033.32 6,471.28 2,426.78 2,282.68 6,175.42 1,545.71 2,272.48 5 9,738.62 26,927.18 8,672.20 TOTAL DUE: $45,338.00 u 4 & 5 57.01110- U80 -40 Taxes Spec, P&I 37,983.50 5,770.34 19 46,519.48 73,552.94 45,213.27 54,546.22 57,398.20 31,943.34 61,247..32 54,670.24 21,183.94 60,973.40 47 26 1.269.92 238,699.12 118,018.09 TOTAL DUE: $617,987.13 a6 57- 01110 - 030 -27 Taxes Spec. P&I 1 508.20 697.46 2,127.70 477.26 476.05 2,118.18 372.40 6,142.42 1,357.86 1,173.51 TOTAL DUE: $8,673.79 10 57- 63100 - + 1a Spec.. 1,340.54 589.42 1,641.86 8,311.64 1,925.08 6 2,160.56 6,165.62 2 5,351.44 030 -01 P&I 867.90 3,747.99 2,405.64 1,520.61 9,218.96 26,884.02 8,542.14 TOTAL DUE: $44,645.12 1 1 t 12 57- 011.10- 020 -30 Taxes Spec. P &I 1981 1982 1983 151.00 876.72 304.53 1984 169.10 840.62 184.53 1985 173.10 804.52 TOTALS 493.20 2,521.86 489.06 1 57- 63100 - 040 -02 Taxes Spec, P &I 1981 1982 1983 1 5,689.20 2,045.02 1984 1.615.74 5,479.24 1,296.61 1985 1,611.62 4.731.00 TOTALS 4,665.34 15,899.44 3 NOTE: Interest on all parcels on taxes due 1981 thru 1984 is figured thru 5/31/85, 1985 taxes good to 5115/85 penalty incurred after 5 /15/85 to 6/15/85 would be 7% on non- homestead 3% on homestead M w s a2 57- 01110 - 010 -28 4 & 1 5 57- 01110- 080 -40 Taxes Spec.P &I Taxes Spec.P &I 37,983.30 5 19 46 73,552.94 45,213.27 11,635.32 429.10 3,453.86 54,546.22 57,398.20 31 13,066.72 412.76 2 61,247.32 54 21,18 15,008.28 396.38 60,973.40 47 39 1,238.24 5 261,269.92 238 118,018.09 06 57- 49000- 021 -07 06 57- 49000 - 022 -06 021 -07 022 -06 Taxes Spec.P &I Taxes Spec.P&I ' 161.68 14.62 61.58 755.44 89.30 252.32 234.84 13.88 45.45 1 84.98 247.29 - 509.68 3..14 1,262.50 22.02 906.20 31.64 107.03 3,286.10 196.30 499.61 11 57- 63100- 040 -01 Taxes Spec. P&I 1 415.96 595.94 910.76 1,734.18 8,328.08 3,788.95 2,033.32 6 2,426.78 2,282.68 6, 175.42 1,545.71 2 5,356.46 9 26,927.18 8,672.20 06 57- 01110- 030 -27 030 -27 Taxes Spec*. P&I 1,896.54 508.20 697.46 2,127.70 477.26 476.05 2,118.18 372.40 6,142.42. 1,357.86 1,173.51 10 5; Taxes 1,340.54 1,641.86 1,925.08 2,160.56 2,150.92 9,218.96 13 5 Taxes 1,134.68 1.134.68 P - 63100 - 030-01 Spec. P&I 589.42 867.90 8,311.64 3,747.99 6,465.90 2,405.64 6,165.62 1,520.61 5,351.44 26,884.02 8,542.14 i- 01110 -030- 29 Spec. P&I 69 192,838.39 182,466.29 174,089.21 139,794.3 758,340.17 PAID 13,609.34 PAID 13,367.20 169.00 11,934.22 169-.00 38,910.76 TOTAL DUE ON ALL PARCELS 1981 -1985) $797,250.93 est.. penalty an 1985 taxes ^ 10,621.00 807 .93 i 1 SCHEDULE OF LIEN CLAIMS AGAINST MAPLEWOOD PROPERTY Ramsey County - Past due taxes, penalties & interest- $805,000 Ramsey County - Future special assessment installments 310,000 State of Minnesota - tax liens 150,000 Internal Revenue, Service - tax liens 75,000 Union Bank and Tru Company - mortgage 34 North Ridge Care Center - judgment 440,000 mechanics-and attorney liens and judgments for attorney fees 45,000 30,000 Total All lien claims against property $2,19.5,000 Total all unsecured claims against Estate of H. Stanley Wessin and Lecon Properties est. $550,000 Page 1 i UNITED STATES BASS KRUPTCy COURT FOR THE i iv iu sc DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Case No. LECON PROPERTIES , INC* Debtor Include here all names used by debtor within last 6 years. CHAPTER 11 VOLUNTARY CASE: DEBTOR'S PETITION 1. Petitioner's post-office address is 11.52 Hamel Road, Hamel, MN 55340 2. Petitioner has resided within this district for the. preceding 180 days. had domicile within this district for the preceding 180 days. 2 han i is principal place of business within this district for the preceding 1$4 days. resided or been domiciled or had principal place of business within this district for a longer portion of the preceding 180 days than in any other district. 3. Petitioner is qualified to file this petition and is entitled . to the benefits of title 11, United States Code as a volun- tary debtor. 4. A copy of petitioner's proposed plan dated 19 is attached. - - - Petitioner intends to file a plan pursuant to chapter 11 of title 11, United States Code. S. Exhibit A is attached to aruf made a part of this Petition.` Wherefore, pv_'tiffioner prays for relief in accordance with chapter 11 of title 11, United States Code. Fredrikson, Bymn, CoMorn, Bisbee & Hansen, - P.A. iPetits) signs f not represented by attorney Signed y — --GuerinDavR . 't: , : /Ellen .. .............: ._..._.....................__....---..._. .___..........._............... Address:..- . $T Petitioner -F - r. ec3ri.kson- B .eon Co1bor-n . 4744 IDS Center And by 'toner Minneapolis , M 55402- eery resid 1 s 612) 347 -7000 Attorneys for Debtor DECLARATION i7 • lC I!'7 w; — .r w w. r — .r -.M r — .— _ "W w.. =W — — —r _ — . 1. lFf 11 V i L L i i fi 1 1 r e I L V , i i .+ v • . L J V 7 • . LrL • I a •• e y - }xrta•r lhn4 llrt oreoeira - tie -mod- ecrreet- • . poi ewe - r>"a ed -#- a r ,r eery # de F- k•-of -perky- 4*et- 4e- fe F-e-,=el rte- 4vu e- e94-ce ry eet- - - ferry. , Wessin, the Vice George President Pre dent CORPORATION: 1, S . Westin the oUe corporation named as petitioner in the foregoing petition, certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. and that the fllinr of this petition on behalf of the corporation has been authorized. — i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - rr m v'ZUrL eat-z ertt- =-vf the -prtYrcrs i•-narncd ass- et+oet- -ice e- e-e}ir..patit wa,- ra af-{e r ur.:.t}t -t. iJcrguiu it .tr•.0 Q.a.nd .curi:e,ct xu.it ih f ling f-thu .petit ian..ron behalf .of.tb 1'i.Irs} i has b at,,.4zed. r1 Executed on September 19 83 Signature: E-Y t /6 IT - Page 1 r..,.._ u.._. I R. 19 A. _*. ,•h..ntor I I _ Vesluntary case debtar'2L nstitien e o WM4 Vice President UN ED STA BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR '..Y DISTRICT OF MINNSo ,_ > Case No. In r" eI ' , Schedule A - STATEMENT OF LECON PROPERTIES, INC. Debtor Include bite all named used by debtor within last G years. ALL LIABILITIES OF DEBTOR Of ` this form is used by joint debtors wherever the question requires separate answers for Husband (H, Rrife (1) or Ioint M insert the appropriate symbolincolumnheadedH, F or J. If the word "debtor" or words referring to debtor are used they shall be read as if in the plural). Schedules A - A -2, and A -3 must include all the claims against the debtor(s) or debtors' property as of the date of the filing of the petition by or against debtor. SCHEDULE A -1 -CREDITORS HAVING PRIORITY t (3) a t6 Speci whtn tlaim was incurred and the consideration therefor; H4Nameofcreditorandtomplete (nailing address when. claim is contingent, unliquidated. disputed, or subject to Indicate if claim is WNatureofelai• setoff, evidented by a judgment, negotiable instrument, or other contingent.including sip code (if vnir+to,an, so style) writing, or inwrred as partner or joint contractor. so indicate; rnhauidated or j Amount of Claim specify forme of any partner or jo co on any debt. disputed. a. Wages. salary. anti conunissions. includint vacaUM severance and sick lease pay owwr to hTOiTworlaurn, aerrsnts. it clerks. or travelins Or city salesmen on aalw7 or commission balls whole or part tithe, whether or taot seuins exclusively for the debtor. not ascrrdlns 22.000 to each, earned within 90 dacs before alters of petition or cesaa- tion of business. It aarlier (specify date). b. Contributions to employee beneAt plans for ser0cm NONEwithin120 days before Alin& or petition or cessation of business. if suer (specify data). o. Deposits by ladividuals. not exceeding 3900 for each for purchase. leas. or rental of NONEproDertyorservitxs for personal, taraity. or household use that were not delivered or provided. d. Taxes owlet teise> by trod of d.. 1. NONEtazandtaunt autbority:) l) Toth* United 2. State of - Minnesostates 2) To any State 3) To any other I&xlmt authority Withholding tax -lien filed November 20, 1980 Total 52 52,764,94 Form o 6 Schedule A 10 -79 EXHIBIT J — Page 2 0 1979 JULIUS BLUMBERG. INC. lame of creditor and complete oaailing address including tip soda if unknown. so state) f ?sedule A -2 -Creditors Holding Securit t2}3)a tS) Specify when claim was incurred and the con- Description of security and date sideration therefor; when claim is contingent, untipuidated. disputed, subject to utoff, tvi- Indicate it claim is contingent. H W when obtained by creditor dented by a judgment. negotiable instrument.unImutdated or or other writing; or incurred as partner or or disputed J Joint contractor, so indicate: specify name of any partner or joint contractor o any deb 1 County of Ramey Tax lien. Meal estate taxes & 113 -138 Courthouse special assests Ste Paul, MST 55104 for approx. years 1978 -1983. 2 North Ridge Care Jud9nent lien Debt based on various Center M real pro- loans to corporation. 5430 Bone Ave.N. perty, docketed New Hope, MN 55428 7/25/830 3 P_ Engineering Mechanic's Survey and engineering Cmpany, Inc, lien, work. on real prcperty 1000 Ee 146th Ste approx. August 1982. Burnsville, M 55337 4 Union Bank &gust Mortcgage on Debt ' approx. CaTpan real. property; Nov. 1981; claim is 312 Central Ave, obtained licquidated; claim is Minneapolis, NN 14ovember 30, guaranteed by sole 55414 19810 shareholder (now deceas ed) . N/A = DISP r N/A N/A 6) (7) Amount of claimMarketvalueWithoutdeduction of value of security 557, 057.34 373,669066 9,237.0. 245, 326.36 E None of the above claims is contingent, liquidated or disputed unless otherwise stated. Total 1,185,290.37 Schedule A -3 - Creditors Having Unsecured Claims Without Priority r amt of creditor (including last known holder Specify when claim was incurred and the consideration therefor; when claim is con. 1H4'1 of any negotiable instrument) eompltte mail• tingent unliquidattd. disputed, subject to sttoff, evidenced by a judgment. nego• Amount of Claim ing address including zip todt (if unknown, tiable instrument. or other writing, or incurred as partner or joint contractor, so or r so state). indicate; specify name of any partner or joint contractor on any debt. J 5 West St. Paul State Bank Doan to debtor pursuant to note dated 30 r 200.40 66 The son Avenue East August 20, 19820 West St., Paul, MST 55118 None of the above claims is contingent, liquidated or disputed unless otherwise stated. Total s in_2nn_nn rorin N 6. Schedule A -2 A A -3. 10 -79 Exhibit J- Page 3 0 1979 JULIUS BL.UMBERG. I.NC Schedule A•3 Oreditors Having Unsecured Claims Wit Priority Maa+t of creditor (including last known holder Specify when claim wts incurred and the consideration therefor; when claim is con- p of as,y neaotiablt instrument) eomolete snail- tingent. unli4uidated, disputed. subiect to setoff. evidenced by a judgment. nepo- W demount of Claim in# address including zip code tit unling". tiable instrument. or other writing. or incurred as partner or joint contractor. so or so state indicate; specify name of any Partner oe joint contractor on any debt J I Y . F None of the above claims is contingent, liquidated or disputed unless otherwise stated. Total Ferny Nn 4; Schrdule /1.3. 10 -79 .. T, _ .. A V 1979 JULIUS BLUMBERG. MC. j SCHEDULE b - w TATEMENT OF ALL PROPERTY JDEBTOR Sehedules B B B-3. and B -4 must include all property of the debtor as of the (late of the filing of the petition h) or ag,ainst debtor. Schedule B -1 --- Real Property H Market value of debtor's interest Description and hcation of All real Poptty in which debtor has an interest (including epuitablt Nature o1 interest (specify all deeds and W without deduction for secured claims i and future interests. interests in estates by the entirety. community Property. lilt estates. Itast• written instruments relating thtreto) or listed in schcdult A•2 or etemp• holds. and tights -And powers exercisable for the benefit of debtor) .1 lions claimed in schedule 8.4 v undevelAppmxlmately46.09 acres of app land in Maplewood Rains CouRamseynty . Minnesota,awned in fee by debtor subject to various liens . the property is legally described on Exhibit 1 to Schedule B--1 and shown on map attached as it 2 to Schedule 8--.. e p is described below as to size,reference numbers and values • Per Acre Parcel Prcperty Assessor's Assessor's Ref . #I* D. No. Acres Val Value 1 5?- 63100 - 040 -Q2 7.21 34,376.00 $ 4, 767.80 2 57- 01110 - 010 -28 6.91 278,162.00 40,255000 4 & 5 57- 01110- 080 -40 29.45 1 44,279.15 12 57- 01110 - 020 -30 2.52 3 1 Estimated total value $1,6 Tot S Schedule 8 -2 -- Personal Prope H Marktt value of citbtor's interest W without deduction for secured claims Type of Property Description and location or listed on sthtdule A•2 or txtmp- 1 tions ttaimtd in schedult 8 -4 L Cash on hand ' _ ' 3. Deposits of money %ith banking insti- tutions, savings and ban assotia- tions. credit unions. public utility companies, landlords, and others Household goods, supplin, and furnish- ings L Books, pictures. and other art objects; stamp, coin, and other colltctions Wearing apparel, jewtlry, firearms. sports equipment. and other personal possessions Automobiles. trutks. trailtrs, and other Vehicles y. boats, motors. and their accessories W M Total --0 orn No. 6. Schedule 9•1 l 8 - 10.79 © 1979 JULIUS BLUMBERG. INC. Exhibit J - Page 5 r Exhibit 1 to Schedule B -1 Legal Descriptions of Maplewood property PARCEL NO, 1 Lot Z, except the South 300 feet thereof , F.. G. Rogers` Garden Lots • PARCEL NO. 2 . The East 230 feet of the N' Section. of the Ni' ofectfell. Township 29 Range 22 PARCEL NO, 4 The SW 1/4 of. the NV 1/ 4 o f Sec .Sectionon 11, Township 2 9 ,Range 22, except the East 711.88 feet of the S 2/2the. ti' 1 / o fSt4oftheIota1/4 of said Section 11 whichliesWesterlyofalineruna •p =allel with and distant85feetWesterlyofthefollowingescribed - o ' t 9 line: FromapiionttieWestlineofsaidSection11distant718.7 feet South cif the W 1/4 corner ,thereof, run •Westerly at an angle of 90. 030' with said West sectionline (rhea sured f r e South to West) for 204 feet,thence deflect to the right at an angle of 'g 90 d0 -for 37.5 feet to the point of beginning odescis g 9 f .line to bebed - they)ce deflect to the zi ht at an angleOf90 ° 00' for 9 r 26 0.04 feet; thence deflect to the right at an angle of 3 012' for 394,21 feet • thence C 46. t to th left at an angle of 4 9 ° 14 ' for 0 8.85g3feet; thence deflect to the right at an angle fgo20030' for 443.06 feet; thence deflect to the leftetatanangleof37 ° 32' for 375.94 feet; thence deflecttotheleftona41curve (Delta Angle 24 °4 8 '9 ) for551.11 feet and there terminating, according to theUnitedStatesGovernmentSurveyheyyeof, Ra.se} Count}Minnesota. PARCEL NO, 5 That part of the Northwest 114 of Southeast 1/4 of Northwest 114 lying westerly of center line of White Bear Avenue, in Section 11, Township - 29, Range 22, in Ramsey County, Minnesota* PARCEL RIO. 12 The nest 167 feet of the East 563.5 feet of the h of the M"-,- of Section I)% Township 29, Range 22, except the North 654 feet thereof Exhibit J — Page 6 B•2 - Personal Property ContinuePY i • Type of property Description and location h. Livestock. poultry. and other animals i. Farming supplies and implements I 1. Office equipment. furnishings. and supplies It. Machinery. i:turM equipment. aad supplies (otter than those listed in items 3 and 1) used in business L Inventory R. Tangible personal property of amt other description s. Patents. copyrights, franchises. and other general intangibits (speedy all documents and writings relating thereto) Government and corporate bonds and other negotiable and nonntgotiable instruments 3. Other liquidated debts owing dtbty Pram•i sso y no from Surnbird Corporation; with - dates, aggregate $97,222.10. Sirbird Corporation has amnu bankruptcy proceedings, Case 1b. BKX 4 -83 -1360 and it is believed c notes Contingent and srniiquidated etaim of every nature including counterclaims are wort il.ess . of the debtor (girt estimated value of each) Interests in msuranct policies (itemize surrender or refund values of each) H Market Walut of debtor's rnCerest W without deduction for secured claim or listed on schedult A•2 or e:em J irons clAtOntd•n schrdult 8•4 s -0 W2 Annuities Stocks and interests in incorporated and unincorporated companies (item - he separately) L interests in partnerships r Equitable and future interests. life estates. and rights or powers extr- c sable for the benefit of the debtor other than those listed in schedule Q - [specify all written instru- nstnts relating thereto) Tots orris No. 6. Sch B - 2 (Continued). 10 .79 Exhibit J - Page 7 ® 1979 JUL IUS BLUMBERG INC. t s Schea a B =3 — Property Not otherwise Sched H Market value of debtor's Interest W without deduction for secured claims Type of property Description and location _ o listed rn schedutt A -2 or t%CMP- J tions claimed in sthedult 8.4 4 a. Property tr under assigonent for btnefit of creditors, within 120 NONE mom days priw to ilino of petition tsptciftr date of assignment, "&of and address of assignee anmrit realized thtrefrom by the assignet. and disposition of proceeds so fsr as known to dtbtor) b. Property : of any mind not etbtrwisrf NONE scheduled Total — A_ del }tor selects the follo• in property as exempt }pursuant to 11 U.S.C.§3 the laws of the State of .................. ............................... Schedule B - 4 —Property Clairned as Exempt H Type o1 property Location destription, and so far as rtlerant to the claim of exemption, spt:ify statute creating the W Value clainitd txemDt present nib of properly exemption or J Not Applicable Total I — SUMMARY OF DEBTS AND PROPER (From the staterane ' f the taebtor in Schedule A and B ) S Total Schedule DEBTS A - /a, b ...... Wages, etc. having priority .-._.--._-...------ N---...--...- _w --- ---- N_..- ..------ • - - - - -. A -1(c) ......... Deposits of money ........................... . .............. .. .........................N..._. A -1/0) L_.Taxes owing United States ............ ...................... A -1 /(d) 2_....Taxes owing states ............... - N ............ .. ------ - ---------------- A - 1/ (d) 3.....Taxes owing other taxing authorities. ............... ..._._.._....._.._._.._..._._. A--2....... ....Secured claims ............... _ ...................... a ........... ................... A -- 3 --- ___.-. --- •. Unsecured claims without priority ......_._........ ..M....1_M...N_.N.._._N..__.. Schedule A total PROPERTY B -- 1 ....... ....,...Real property (total value) .._...__-..» ............... .......M......_......N..._ B - 2 /a..__. ..... ..Cash on hand. .............. N - --- - -- --------------------------- M._...N...N.N..._..1N._1.._ i' B--2/b 'N_._... Depos ........... N -------------- ........_---------------------- w- ......__- ._r_N ---N_N_.._.. B- 2 /c ........... Household goods ................................... .......N.._._______....._._..._ B-- 2 /d.....N..._Books, pictures, and collections ....... M --- N-- M ------------------------- M_N ---MNM B -- 2 /e ............ Wearing apparel and personal possessions_.. _._...N .............N.N........ B, - 2 /f.__N .._._..Automobiles and other vehicles ...................M_..N._ Boats, motors, and accessor ........... r -------------------------- --------------N_ B -2/h__._._. . __-Livestock and other animals_.__ ........................ ........_.._- .N......N......_.. i B i .__...._..__Farmincr supplies and implements....._. ............. ..N_..._....._.._._........._.. i B ... . ....... Office equipment and supplies N.._... N.._..._ N_ N .N.._-- ..N.___- ...___- .___.N__• B- 2/k ...... ".- _.Machinery, equipment, and supplies used in business ........... ........... B - 2/L ........... Inventory ......... _ N.• N .............................. N-•--•---------- •- N ....... ....- •- •- ..N - -... B -2/ m_ Other tangible personal property. 2 /n ........... Patents and other general intangib - .............. ...........N._._.___........_.. B- 2 /o. --.___...Bonds and other instruments ... .................... N --------------- N ------------------ .. B- 2, /p ............ Other liquidated debts ......................... ........... .............. ......... .N....... B- 2 /q ............ Contingent and unliquidated claims ----------- _.__-----__----._.-.-N__-_..__.-_- B--2; r._.__...__ Interests licies........... ......- -------------------------------------in insurance policies B- 2 /s.._: ....... Annuities ............. • ............................. . ............... ... ................. B-- 2/t ------------- Interests in corporations and unincorporated companies ....... _....... B-2 /u. .._..Interests in parinersiips. ............................... ...................------------ JB--- 2 /v.._.._ ......Equitable and future interests, riglits, an3 powers in personalty...... Property assigned for benefit of creditors....... ..... .................•__ - -_. -_ B--- 3/b .. ......... Property not otherwise scheduled....-........._ ........ ..... ............................... Schedule B total 0- aV _ 5.2 4.9.4. Q- N._..- .__._..._.•N._.. .. ..__.....I- __............. 31 O.O.Q.. UNSWORN DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY 1,529 ,000.00 0-1__M.._.........._.... O o- O 0- ...... 0-- ...... 00 ............ f1- ...._. n_ ls29 ,000.00 ev&_xA a J t40. ttee i]" Y' -mod cars. ert.. to .tb h.i. e..uy{ ou - -- vId iiate. i.el. We George S. Wessin President andCORPOKATION : , Jerry Wessln, Vice President of the cor named as debtor in this case, certify under penalty of er'ur - that Thave r ad the fore * -gin schedules. consistin sheets, a d that they are tru correct to the best o ! 1 e r g g of 1Qa our kno ledge. information, and belief. S r_z 1L b c r rtaaai s6.r_.i.:z.thir.rc..z }-.0 a1L }' v - '- •- 1- 1e•-- r•ee -thy -f ors --•h _._.._........_. nf .sue... k:- ld- ..ati+.- aid- .l,alf. c 83 .... ... - -- .. . . ..recuted on Sep .i 1 .. signaturenature in President essin Vice President Georg S . Wes sin,, , Je , Paae ...._., ....... o• •..eseor ..,,- For joint cases Husband (H) Wife (W) Z ` . t. i 0 tif COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A Reliance Group Holdings Company x -File No. C156 1 9 Page 1 of 9 Schedule B - Section 1 The following are the requirements to be complied with: 1. Instrument creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and filed for record , to -wit : a . As to Parcels - 1 Conveyance of the estate or interest in land described in Schedule A from The Trustee in The Bankruptcy of LeCon Properties, Inc., a Minnesota cor- poration, Case No. BgY 4--83 -1613 to the Proposed Insured. Note: Certificate of Real Estate Value, Affidavit of Purchaser of Registered Land and owner' Duplicate Certificate of Title must accompany the deed for filings. b. As to Parcels 5, 6 and 7: Conveyance of the estate or interest - in land described in Schedule A from The Personal Representative of the Estate of H. Stanley wessin, stating marital status of the deceased to the Proposed Insured. Note: Certificate of Real Estate Value must accompany the deed for filing. Note: we require an opportunity to examine accompanying probate docu- ments prior to closing* 2. Pay the full consideration to, or for the account of, the grantors or mortgagors. 3. Pay all taxes, charges, assessments, levied and assessed against subject Eatisfactoryremiseswhich a re dice and payable. evidence should be had that rovenents and /or re airs oru . P p + - t rsalterations .hereto sip Ccnpleted, that contractor, sub contrae ors, labor and material men are all paid; and have released of record all liens or notice of intent to 1w.rfect a lien . for labor or material. 5. As to Parcels 1- 1 Obtain and file of record a properly executed Certificate of Redemption from that certain Sheriff's Sale, evidenced by Certificate Document Nos. 728574 T), 2159963 (A) as recited on Schedule A -3 -A hereof, running in favor of LeCon Properties, Inc., dated prior to the expiration ofthe period of redemption as extended by Bankruptcy Case No. BKY 4 -83- 161.3• An Affidavit of Additional Amount on Redemption in the amount of $58,349.87 has been filed, dated September 29, 19 83 , filed September 309 19 83 , as Document Nos-0 ,. 745031 (T), 2194971 (A)• CONTINUED- C. OMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A UL'ance Group Holdings Company p File No. 015619 Page 2 of 9 Schedule B - Section 1 continued) 6. As to Parcels 1 -4: Obtain and file of record the following in connection with Bankruptcy Case Ho. 4 -83 -1613: a. A certified copy of the order appointing the Trustee and fixing the amount of the bond or of the order approving the election of the Trustee and fining the amount of the bond. b. Either: 1 ) A Certified Copy of th certification by the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court that Notice for a hearing for the sale of subject property free and clear was filed and was given to interested parties, and that no timely request for a hearing was filed by any parties; Or in the alternative: 2) A Certified Copy of the order of the Bankruptcy Court, after Notice and Hearing, approving the sale of subject property by the trustee, free and clear. We require opportunity to examine all proposed documents submitted to fulfill the above requirements prior to closing and reserve the right to add requirements or exceptions to this commitment after examination of said documents. If it is proposed to convey the property from the trustee free and clear of any or all of the judgments listed below, we require oppor- tunity to examine the Bankruptcy file, and to require additional documents prior to closing. 7. As to Parcel 7: The conveyance to H. Stanley Wessin by Lawrence S. Guzzo and Carol A. Guzzo was issued subsequent to the death of the grantee. We require recordation of a corrective deed from the Guzzos to the Personal Representative of the Estate of H. Stanley Wessin prior to closing. Note: Certificate of Real Estate Value must accompany the deed for filing. 8* As to Parcels 1-4: Since a portion of subject property is Registered, we require approval of the conveyance of the Trustee and all Bankruptcy documents by the Examiner of Titles prior to closing. 9. As to Parcels 5 - 7: Since H. Stanley Wessin is deceased, we require submission to us for exami- nation prior to closing of the requisite probate documents. We reserve the right to add to. this commitment after examination of said documents. _ CDNTINUED- s s • It COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A Reliance Group Holdings Company File Now C15.619 Page 3 of 9 Schedule S - Section 1 continued) 10. File of record prior to closing., the proposed Plat of Maple Ridge Malle we require correction of the recitals to reflect the current interests of all of the parties in subject property underlying said Plat. The proposed Plat as submitted to us contained the following incorrect recitals: a. Lawrence S. Guzzo and Carol A. Guzzo are shown as fee, owners on said pro- posed plat, though deed has been delivered to H. Stanley Wessin (Though issued after his death)* one of the following must be complied with prior to filing the proposed plat. 3. Either a correction deed should be placed of record, making the gran- tee on the incorrect deed the Personal Representative of the Estate of H. Stanley Wessin , and the recital .on the Plat changed to reflect that the Guzzos do not have an interest in said property; II. Or the Guzzos interest on the plat must be shown as subject to a Contract for Deed in favor of H. Stanley .wessin. . b. As to Paroel 7: The interest of Minneapolis Federal Savings and Loan Association, now Midwest Federal Savings and Loan Association of Minneapolis as mortgagee must be recited unless the mortgage from Lawrence S. Guzzo and Carol.A. Guzzo, Doument No. 1644177, is partially released as to subject property of record prior to closing. 11. Since it is proposed to convey a portion only of the new plat of Maple Ridge Mall by a sp? it of platted lots, we require compliance. with the following prior to closing: a. Recordable certification of approval, nonapplicability, or waiver of. municipal subdivision regulations issued 'by the city clerk must be attached to the conveyance pursuant to Minn. Stat Section 4629358 - Subd. 4a . b. Approval of the proposed legal description at Schedule A -4 -A for use on a conveyance by the Registrar of Titles for Ramsey. County. 12 As to Parcels 1- Obtain and file of record a satisfaction of, or release of subject premises from the following judgment of record, and a release of subject property from the Levy and Attachment pursuant to the Writ of Execution. File No. 797875 Court File No. 463625 D July 25, 1983 Amount $373,669.66 , Document No. 741186 ( T) In favor of: North Ridge Care Center Against: LeCon Properties, Inc. 1. "Levy and Attaehement Dated: September 16, 1983 Filed: September 16, 1983 Document Nos. 744285(T) 219 3202 (A ) See information attached.) CONTINUED- 4 COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A Reliance Group Holdings Con *Qny File No C15619 Page 4 of 9 .Schedule B - Section I continued) 13. As to Parcels 1 -7: We require discharge of lis pendens and satisfaction of mechanic's lien to be tiled in county real estate records and dismissal of the action from the plaintiffand all answering lien claimants filed in the District Court with respect to the following mechanic's lien: Mechanic's Lien Statement Dated November 17, 1982 . Executed By: Probe Engineering Company, Inc. , • . Against: H. Stanley Wessin Recorded: November 17, 1982 Document Nos.: 729 484 (T) 2161805 (A ) Amount: $9,237.01 Notice of Lis Pendens Dated: August 17, 1983 Recorded: August 23, 1983 Document Nos.: 74283 219 0006 (A ) District Count File No.: 464071 See information attached.) 14. As to Parcels 3, 5 and 7: Obtain and file of ,record a release of subject property from the. following Attorney's Lien of record: In favor of: John E. Daubney Dated: Febr ary 5, 1982 Filed: December 8, 1982 L' Document No.: 730321 Recorded: February 5 , . 19 82 Document No.: 2138465 Against: H. Stanley,wessin and Jerry Wessin and LeCon Properties, Inc. Amount: $7,362.50 See information attached.) 15. As to Parcel 3: Obtain and file of record a discharge of lis pendens to be filed in the county real estate records, and a dismissal of the action to be filed ' in the District Court to the following Notice of Lis Pendens : f Filed: _May 2, 1983 Document No. 736571 Court File No. 797875 . Plaintiff: North Ridge Care Center See information attached.) CONTINUED- P.- _ L. L.4.- l neA* (4 r a ,COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A Reliance Group Holdings Company 3 File No . C15619 Page 5 of 9 Schedule B :. Section 1 (continued) 16. As to Parcels 1 - 4: We require satisfaction of, or release of the subject premises from, the following Judgment of record: File. No. 95980 Dated: June 29, 1983 Docketed: June 29, 1983 V •Filed... October 11, 1983 Document No. 745675 (T) Amount: $28,894 In favor of: Nest St. Paul State Bank Against: LeCon Properties, Inc. Notice of Intention to Redeem By: West St. Paul State Bank Filed* October 11, 19 83 Document No. 745676(T). 17. As to Parcel 7: Pay and satisfy of the record the following mortgage: Dated: March 23, 1965 Executed by,* Lawrence. S. Gu zzo and Carol A. -Guzzo To: Minneapolis Federal Savings and .Loan Association Document No. 16441 Recorded: Larch 29, 1965 Original Principal Amount: $14,500.00* 18. We require satisfaction of, or release of the subject premises from, the following judgment of record : ve File No. 456944 Filed on Certificate of Title Docketed: May 6, 1982 Amount: $26,378.64 In favor of: Larkin, Hoffman Against: Stanley He Wessin. No. 198218 as Document Noe 724607* Daly & Lindgren ; Ltd . • See information attached.) 19. We require an affidavit of non - identify, a discharge, a certificate of non - attaehement or a release of the subject premises from the following federal tax liens: a* Taxpayer: Jerry A. Wessin t/ Document No. 2143175 Filed: April 13, 1982 Amount: $86,508.82 - b. Taxpayer: Stanley H. Wessin Document No. 2201675 Filed: November 23, 1983 Amount: $14,610.47. CONTINUED- i COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A Retince Group Hokl+ngs Company File No. C15619 Page 6 of 9 :.:. .. Schedule B - Section 1 ( continued) 19. (continued) e. Taxpayer: Stanley He Wessin Document No 2139958 March 1 1Filed. , 829 Amount: $48,907.50. d. Taxpayer: Stanley He Wessin. Document No. 2143175 . v Filed: April 13, 1982 Amount $86,508*82 20. We require an affidavit of non - identity, a discharge, a certificate of non - attachment or a release of the subject premises from the following state tax liens a. Taxpayer: Jerry A. Wessin Document No • 2091599 Filed: October 14 , 1980 Amount: $52,764.9 be Taxpayers Jerry A. Wessin V / Document No. 2117845 Filed.* June 410, 19 Amount: $57,434.90 c. Taxpayer: Stanley Ile Wessin Document No. 211"18 Filed: June 10, 1981 J Amount $57,434 o9 0 d• Taxpayer: Stanley He Wessin Document No. 2093599 Filed: October 14, 1980 _ Amount: $52,764.94 e. Taxpayer: Stanley H. Wessin Document No 209 359 8 Filed October 14 1980 Amount :" $43 ,763.64. 21 • As to Parcel 5: Since the property is registered, we require completion prior to closing of a Proceeding Subsequent to include the vacated portion of the street vacated in Document No. 709 083 in the body of the legal description. ( See infor- mation attached.) CONTINUED- G .. L . 0. _4-. Le _ nri i a CO LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A Reiwxe Group Holdings Company File No. C15619 Page 7 of 9 Schedule B - Section 1 (continued) 22 . As to Parcels 5, 6 and 7 : Pay and satisfy of record the following mortgage: Dated: December 10, 1981 Recorded /Filed: January 12 1982 1 614 T 21DocumentNo.: 7 7 { 6478(A)3 L Executed by: g. Stanley Wessin and Jerry Ann Wessin To: Union Bank and Trust Company Original Principal Amount: $298,412.62. Power of Attorney to Foreclose Mortgage by Peterson, Engberg and Peterson, filed October 8, 19 82 , as Document No. 727855 • 23. As to Parcel 5: Obtain and file of record a Discharge of Notice of Lis Pendens as to the following: Filed: January 11, 1983 Document No. 731557 District Court File No. 797875 Against: H. Stanley Wessin etal By: North Ridge Care Center. (See copy attached.) 24. Obtain and file of record a Discharge of Notice of Lis Pendens as to the following: a. As to Parcel 4: Recorded: January 10, 1983 Document No. 2165922 L District Court File No. 797875 Against* LeCon Properties etal . By: North Ridge Care Center. (See information attached.) b. As to Parcel 1: Recorded: January 10, 1983 Document No. 2165925 District Court File No. 797875 Against: LeCon Properties etal . By: North Ridge Care Center. (See information attached.) c. As to Parcel 1: Recorded: May 2, 1983 Document No. 2176622 District Court File No. 797875 Against: LeCon Properties etal e By: North Ridge Care Center. (See information attached.) d. As to Parcel 7: Recorded: May 2, 1983 Document No. 2176628 District Court File No: 797875 _ Against: LeCon Properties etal. By: North Ridge Care Center. (See information attached.) CONTINUED- COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A Reliance Group Hddmgs Company File No. C15619 Page 8 of 9 Schedule 8 - Section 1 (continued) 25. As to Parcel 6: By Final Decree in the Estate ofThoMaas M. Cummings, recorded July 6, 196o, as Document No. 1514052, a 1/4 interest was assigned to ..Genevieve A. Cu=ings . By Quit Claims Deed, dated March 18, 19 60 , recorded May 26, 1960 as Document No. 1511154, Genevieve A* Sampson and Charles Sampson, her hus- band, convey the property to C. J. Cummings, the current tee owners predecessor in title. No recital in said deed, and no Affidavit of Identity appear of record to establish that the two Genevieves are one and the same person. We require recordation of an Affidavit of Identity by person with knowledge stating that the Genevieve in Document No. 1514052 and 1511154 are one and the same person. (See information attached.) 26. Pay delinquent real estate taxes for the years shown in the amounts shown, plus penalty, interest and costs: a. Parcel 1: 1983 1984 District b . Parcel 2 1983 1984 District 159311e83 15,712.36 of Plat 01110, Parcel 010 -28 1,314.53 1,176.98 57, Plat 01110, Parcel 020 -30 c. Parcels 3 and 4: 1983 $141,984.64 1984 $135,1'!9.31 District 57 , Plat 01110, Parcel 080 -40 d. Parcel 5: 1983 $ 33r 060.93 District 57, Plat 01110, Parcel 030 -27 e. Parcel 6: I. 1983 $ 844.74 1984 1, 353.14 District 57, Plat 49000, Parcel 022 -06 II • 1983 $ 176.30 1984 248.72 District 57, Plat 49000, Parcel 022 -07. CONTINUED- Any _ 1> 1 ELN V j /• COMA fONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A Reline Group Hokiings CouWny File No. C15619 Page .9 of 9 Schedule B - Section 1 (continued) 27. In order to file the Plat, the real estate taxes for 1985 must be paid in full as to the following: a. Parcel 1: Real estate taxes for and payable in the year 1985 in the amount of 131404e66, first half due 15, 1985, second half due October 15, 1985. Base Tax: $13,008.28, Non - homestead. . District 57, Plat 01110, Parcel 010-28. b. Parcel 2: Real estate taxes for and payable in the year 1985 in the amount of 977,62, first half due May 15, 19 85 , second half due October 15, 1985* Base Tax: $173.10, Non - homestead. District 5 7, Plat 01110, Parcel 020 -30: e. Parcels 3 and 4: Real estate taxes for and payable in the year 1985 in the amount of 108,280'8C, first half due May 15, 1985, second half. due October 15, 1985. Base Tax: $60,973.40, Note- homestead. District 57, Plat 01111, Parcel 080 -40. Al d. Parcel 5: w Real estate taxes for and payable in the year 1985 in the amount of 2,49o.58, first half due May 15, 19 85 , second half due October 15, 1985. Base Tax: $2,118.18, Non- homestead. District 57, Plat 01110, Parcel 030 -27. e. Parcel 6: I. Real estate taxes for and payable in the year •1985 in the amount of 1,284,52, first half due May 15, 19 85 , second half due October 15, 1985. Base Tax: $1,262.50, Non - homestead. District 57, Plat 49000, Parcel 022 -06. II. Real estate taxes for and payable in the year 1985 in the amount of 512,82, first half due May 15, 19 85 , second half due October 15, 19 85 . Base Tax: $509.68, Non- homestead ; 22-070District5?, Plat ' x#9000, Parcel f. Parcel 7: Real-estate taxes for and payable in the year 1985 in the amount of 1,303.68, first half due May 15, 1985, second half due October 15, 19850 Base Tax: $1,134.68, Non-homestead. District 57, Plat 01110, Parcel 030 -29. American Land Title Association Commitment Schedule B - Section 1 Form 1004 -5 June 27,, GREEnBRIER HOME, inc, Action by Council: Endorse 1985 k o d. fie 2eJ ec* e Da+- e Barry Evans Maplewood City Manager 1380 Frost Ave. Maplewood, MN 55109 Mr. Evans; I am writing to request speaking time at the Maplewood City Council meeting (preferably the July 10th meeting. We are planning to open a group home for autistic adults at the end of the summer in Maplewood, and I would like to explain to the Council about the home as well as address any questions or concerns they may have. I will contact you the week of July 7th to confirm the date and time. Sincerely, Patricia Cullen 941 BIRMINGHAM ST. / SAINT PAUL, MN 55106 / (612) 771 -5531