Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985 05-13 City Council PacketAGENDA Maplewood City Council 7:00 P.M., Monday, May 13, 1985 Municipal Administration B u i l d i n g Meeting 85 -09 C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes 85 -05, Meeting March 11, 1985 20 Minutes 85 -06, Meeting March 25, 1985 D)APPROVAL OF AGENDA E)CONSENT AGENDA 2. All matters 'listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine b y the 3. City Council and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There CDRB : Rol l i ng Hi 11 s Mobil e Home Park w i l l be no separate discussion on these items. If discussion is desired, that 60 item will' be r=emoved from the Consent Agenda will be considered . se aratelp y Triathlon Minnesota 1.Accounts Payable 2.Budget Transfer - 3.Chan ~e of Managers Red Lobster 4.Coun Street Plan Variancece F)PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.7:00: Ripley Ave. Project . (4. Votes) 2.7:10: J . R. 's Maplewood L quor License 3.7:20: Variance: 1774 Cope Avenue; Easement Vacation 4.7:30: P.U.D.: 2996 Hazelwood 5.7:40: P.U.D. & Preliminary Plat: Maplewood Hills Quads 6.7:50: Prel i riii nary Plat Cave's 2nd Addition G) AWARD OF BIDS H) UPJFINISHED 3USINESS I) NEW BUSINESS 1.Parking Lot Pondi ng 2.Maplewood Heights 12th Addition 3.CDRB: Maplewood West 4.CDRB : Rol l i ng Hi 11 s Mobil e Home Park 5.Golf Ordinance - lst Reading 60 Asst. Fire Marshal Position 7.Triathlon Minnesota 8.Lease Agreement - F1icek Park J) VISITOR PRESENTATIONS M) ADJOURNMENT D MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Thursday, March 11, 1985 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 85 -05 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Greavu.. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present MaryLee Maida, Councilmember Present Michael T. Wasiluk, Councilmember Absent C. APPROVAL OF MINUT 1 Meeting No. 85 -01 (January 14, 1985 ) Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 85 -01 January 14, 1985) -as submitted Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. H.R.C. Appointment 2. Kennard - Beam to D 3. Southlawn -.Beam to D 4. Semaphores 5. Parking Lots 6. Independent Hearing Officer 7. C.L.U. Plan Meeting 8. Move Item H - 3 to after F - 2 Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Anderson moved, Seconded by Councilmember Bastian, Ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda, Items 1 through 5 as recommended: 1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses - Check register dated 02 -28 -85 through 03 -01 -85 - $247,971.28 Part II - Payroll dated 02 -22 -85 - $65,823.50) in the amount of $313,794.78. 3/11 2. Final Plat - Robert Tilsen's Maplewood Heights No. 13 Approved the final plat of Robert Tilsen's Maplewood Heights No. 13 located at Gall Avenue.and McKnight Road. 3. Playground Equipment Authorized the transfer of $15,000 from the P.A.C. Charges to the playground equipment fund. 4. Change Order - McClelland Water Main Resolution No. 85 - 3 - 29 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project No. 84- 04.and has let a construction contract therefor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and. WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project No. 84 -04, Change Orders No. 1R -2 and No. 2,. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the City Engineer is hereby authorized and.directed to modify the existing contract.by executing said Change Orders No. 1R-2 and No. 2. 5. Bennington Woods - Final Plat Approved the Bennington Woods Plat 2 final plat, subject to the following conditions being satisfied before it is signed by the mayor: 1. Submission of a hold- harmless waiver of damages agreement to the City Attorney for approval. This document shall specify the loca- tion of the structures that encroach upon the City's easement and shall waive any claim of damages against the City in the event the structures become damaged during the repair of the public utilities. 2. City Attorney review of the declaration of condominium documents for compliance with the conditions of preliminary plat approval. F . PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M., Preliminary Plat Cave's Lakewood Addition a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Ed Cave and Sons for approval of a preliminary plat for 29 single-dwelling lots at 2384 E. Larpenteur Avenue. b. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. c. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the Planning Commission recommendation. d. Mr. Robert Cody, 2312 Montana, stated the hearing notices were in error. Staff stated the Ramsey County Abstractor's Office had everyone 2 - 3/11 that lived on Montana were given Larpenteur addresses in error. e. Mr. Sam Cage, representing Ed Cave and Sons, spoke on behalf of the proposal. f. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following were heard: Marvin Mathews, 1592 Myrtle Robert Cody, 2312 Montana Gene Schouviller, 1616 Myrtle Mike Hurley, 2376 Larpenteur Herb Neilsen, 2416 E. Larpenteur Don Dunman, 2382 Montana Cindy Oxton, 1636 Myrtle g. Mayor Greavu moved to table this item until the meeting of March 25, 1985, for further revi Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. lA.. Request for Improvement Project : Lakewood Drive Councilmember Bastian moved to table Item F- lA until the meeting of March 25, 1985. _ ` Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 2. 7 :10 P.M., Easement Vacation : 1249 Dennis Street a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a proposal to vacate an easement located on Lot 5, Block 1, Cave's Century 4th Addition. b. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. C. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the Planning commission recommendation. d. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. f. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 85 - 3 - 30 WHEREAS, Ed Cave and Sons, Inc. and Daniel A. McGrane initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following described real property: That part of Lot 5, Block 1, Cave's Century 4th Addition, lying west of the east ten feet thereof, lying east of the west ten feet thereof and lying south of the north 17.75 feet. 3 - 3/11 WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. This vacation was initiated by Ed Cave and Sons, Inc. and Daniel A. McGrane on January 22, 1985; 2. A majority of the owners of property abutting said storm sewer and utility easement have signed a petition for this vacation; 3. This vacation was reviewed by the Planning Commission on March 4, 1985. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that this vacation be approved. 4. The City Council held a public hearing on March 11, 1985, to consider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written state- ments. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above described storm sewer and utility easement, public interest in the property will accrue to the following de- scribed abutting property: Lot five, Block one, Cave's Century 4th Addition. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that it is in the public interest to grant the above- described vacation on the basis that adequate maintenance access will be available if the storm sewer is relocated as required. This vacation shall not be recorded with Ramsey County until the storm sewer is relocated in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer, to be parallel with and eight feet south of the north property line of 1249 Dennis Street or a developer's agreement with the required surety is entered into. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. Mayor Greavu moved to discuss Item H -3 at this time. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 3. Code Amendment : NC District (2nd Reading - 4 Votes) a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 582 AN ORDINANCE PERMITTING CERTAIN USES IN A NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT BY SPECIAL COUNCIL APPROVAL 4 - 3/11 I THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 36 -127 is hereby amended as follows: Sec. -127. Permitted uses. Any of the following uses provided that the floor area of all build - ings in any one NC zone shall not exceed three thousand (3,000) square feet: 1) Bakery or candy shop for the production of goods sold on the premises. 2 ) Beauty parlor or barber shop. 3) Dry cleaner or laundromat. All odors must be controlled so as not to be noticeable to adjacent residents. 4) Office or medical and dental clinics. 5 ) Repair shop, except for. motorized Vehicles. No work shall be performed outside of the building. 6) Drug, hardware or grocery . store . 7) Studio. 8) Tailor or dressmaker shop. 9) Veterinary or grooming clinic where there are not outside kennels or storage. 10 ) Video tape rentals. 11) Printing shop. Section 2. Section 36-129 is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 36 -129. Conditional uses (requires Council approval). Any of the following uses, provided that the floor area of all buildings in any one NC zone shall not exceed eight thousand (8,000) square _feet: 1) Any permitted use listed in Section 36-127. 2 ) Club, lodge or hall. 3) Private school, daycare center or community service use. 4) Taxi stand or bus stop. 5) Restaurant where there are no drive -up order windows or serving of food to patrons in their automobiles. All cooking odors must be controlled so as not to be noticeable to adjacent residents. 5 - 3/11 6) Other uses, where the City Council finds that the use would be compatible with the neighborhood and the intent of this division. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 1. Plan Amendment and Rezoning 1915 -25 Arcade (4 Votes) a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. b. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. None were heard. c. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. d. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 85 - 3 - 31 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan from RL, low density residential to LSC, limited service commercial for the following- described property: Subject to avenues and streets the E 99 feet of the S 120 feet of the NE 1/4 of Section 17, Township 29, Range 22. This property is more commonly described as 1925 Arcade Street; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. This plan amendment was initiated by the City of Maplewood. 2. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 4 1985, to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was pub- lished and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said plan amendment be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on March 11, 1985. The Council considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described plan amendment be approved on the basis that the LSC designation would be compatible with the neighborhood commercial zone south for this corner and would be compatible with the adjacent residential development. Adopted this 11th day of March, 1985. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 6 - 3/11 e. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 85 - 3 - 32 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business commercial to R -3, multiple dwelling residential for the following- described property: Subject to Roads, the N 103 feet of the E 188.5 .feet of the SE 1/4 of Section 17, Township 29, Range 22 and Lot 1, Block 1, Parkside, Ramsey County, Minnesota. This property is also known as 1915 Arcade Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on February 4, 1985. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood.City Council held a public hearing on March 11, 1985, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially.injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neigh- borhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area in- cluded in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Adopted this 11th day of March, 1985. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 7 - 3/11 f. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 85 - 3 - 33 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business commercial to NC, neighborhood commercial for the following- described property: Subject to avenues and streets the E 99 feet of the S 120 feet of NE 1/4 of Section 17, Township 29, Range 22. This property is also known as 1925 Arcade Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on February 4, 1985. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on March 11, 1985, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed purusant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neigh- borhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area in- cluded in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Adopted this 11th day of March, 1985. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 2. Plan Amendment and Rezoning : Larpenteur and McKnight (4 Votes) a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. 8 - 3/11 T b. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following were heard: Mr. George Nelson, George Nelson Associates, requested tabling of the decision regarding the NE corner of Larpenteur and McKnight. C. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. d. Councilmember Maida introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 85 - 3 - 34 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan from SC, service commercial to LSC, limited service commercial for the following- described property: The property in the northwesterly corner of Larpenteur Avenue and McKnight Road. This property is more commonly described as 2251 Larpenteur Avenue, 1695 and 1709 McKnight Road. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. This plan amendment was initiated by the City of Maplewood. 2. The Maplewood Planning Commission -held a public hearing on February 4, 1985, to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant.to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said plan amendment be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on March 11, 1985. The Council considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following finding of fact: The LSC designation would be more compatible with the adjacent neigh- borhood development and residential land use classification. Adopted this 11th day of March, 1985. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all e. Councilmember Maida introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 85 - 3 - 35 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business commercial to NC, neighborhood commercial for the following- described prop- erty: 9 - 3/11 Unplatted lands subject to County Road A and McKnight Road, the South 176 feet of the East 247 5/10 ft. of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29, Range 22 This property is also known as 2251 Larpenteur Avenue East, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on February 4, 1985. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on March 11, 1985, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neigh- borhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area in- cluded in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Adopted this 11th day of March, 1985. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson.Ayes - all. f. Councilmember Maida moved to postpone descision rega the N.E. corner of Larpenteur and McKnight for four (4) months. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson.Ayes - Councilmembers Maida and Anderson Nays - Mayor Greavu and Council - member Bastian. Motion tied. 10 - 3/11 1 g. Councilmember Maida moved to postpone decision regarding the N.E . corner of Larpenteur and McKnight for nine (9) months. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. 4. McKnight Road - Variance. a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. b. No action taken. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Recycling a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson and Maida. Nay - Councilmember Bastian. b. Ms. Colleen Halpine, Solid Waste Planner, Ramsey County, explained to the Council what options are available for recycling in Maplewood. 2. Gambling.License Application (M.S. - Guldens) a. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 85 - 3 - 36 WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, Minnesota North Star Chapter has applied for a gambling license for gambling to be don - ducted at 2999 Maplewood Drive, City of Maplewood, presently known as Gulden's Roadhouse, a licensed on -sale liquor establishment. WHEREAS, Section 15 -47 of the Maplewood Code provides that any or- ganization otherwise qualified applying for a license "mall have been in existence in the City for at least three (3) years and shall have at least thirty ( 30) members." WHEREAS, Section 15 -48 of the Maplewood Code requires the premises shall be either owned or under lease for a term of at least six (6) months by the applicant and said premises shall be the regular meeting place of such organization. WHEREAS, it appears that the aforesaid premises is not the regular meeting place of the organization nor has the organization been in ex- istence in Maplewood for a period of three (3) years nor does the or- ganization own the premises or have a lease for a term of at least six 6} months as required by the ordinances. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, that it finds that said National Multiple Sclerosis Society, Minnesota North Star Chapter and its application for a gambling license does not meet the requirements of the Maplewood Code and is therefore, denied. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. 11 - Ayes - all. 3/11 7 3. Joint Powers Agreement - H.R.A. a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Maida introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 85 - 3 - 37 RESOLUTION APPROVING A JOINT PROGRAM FOR FINANCING RENTAL HOUSING AND GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT AND REGULATORY AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS: A) The City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, by a resolution adopted on October 8, 1984, has approved a multi - family rental housing develop- ment, known as the "Maple Ridge Partnership Project" and the financing thereof pursuant .to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C; B) It is now proposed that the Maple Ridge Partnership Project should be financed, together with certain other multi - family rental housing projects lo- cated in various municipalities in the State of Minnesota, pursuant to a single issue of revenue bonds or obligations; C) It is anticipated that such revenue bonds or obligations will be structured as a "loan -to- lender" transaction with Midland Financial Savings and Loan Association of Des Moines, Iowa, acting as the "lender ", and that the bonds will be underwritten by Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood Incorporated; D) It is further proposed that the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, (the "St. Paul HRA ")should issue the revenue bonds or obligations, acting on behalf of itself with respect to cer- tain projects located within the city limits of the City of Saint Paul, and on behalf of such other municipalities, including this City, as may approve the financing of multi - family rental housing projects located therein for fi- nancing pursuant to a joint program; E) It appears that such an issue of bonds or obligations to finance a joint financing program will result in substantial financial benefits to the developers of the multi - family rental housing developments and will accord- ingly assist the economic viability of such developments and will result in lower rental housing costs to the residents of such developments; F) There has been submitted to this City Council a form of Regulatory Agreement and a form of Joint Powers Agreement providing for a joint housing program and for the issuance of bonds or obligations to finance such joint housing program; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLE - WOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The City hereby approves the financing of the Maple Ridge Partnership Project, together with certain other multi - family rental housing developments located in various municipalities in the State of Minnesota, by the issuance 12 - 3/11 of a single issue of revenue bonds or obligations to be issued by the M St. Paul HRA on behalf of itself and all of such other municipalities. 2. The form of the Joint Powers Agreement submitted to this City Council is hereby approved. The Mayor and such other officers or employees of the City as may be appropriate are hereby authorized and directed to exe- cute the Joint Powers Agreement upon execution thereof by such other muni- cipalities or other political subdivisions as may I also approve the financing under the joint program. This City Council hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and other appropriate officers and employees of the City to execute the Joint Powers Agreement with such variations, alterations, modifications or other changes as may be required to effectuate the purposes of this reso- lution and are not, in the opinion of the City Attorney, materially adverse to the interests of this City. 3. The financing program for the Maple Ridge Partnership Project, to- gether with the financing programs for the other multi - family rental housing developments to be financed under the joint program, is hereby authorized to be submitted to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency in combined form and as may be appropriate to secure the approval of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency to the joint program and the financing of all of the multi - family ren- tal housing developments to be included therein. 4. The Mayor and other appropriate officers or employees of the City are further authorized and directed to execute a Regulatory Agreement by and among the developer of the Maple Ridge Partnership Project, the City, the Trustee for the revenue bonds or obligations issued to finance the joint program, : such other parties as may be appropriate. Such Regulatory Agreement shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney, and shall contain such terms and conditions as may be required to implement this City's policies with respect to rental housing, with respect to the payment of fees, expenses and other charges associated with revenue bond financing, and with respect to any other matters which would normally be included in agreements between the City and the developer of a project financed by revenue bonds. The approvals and authorizations contained in this resolution are hereby made expressly subject to the execution of such Regulatory Agreement containing such terms and condi- tions as may be acceptable to the Mayor and City Attorney. 5. Based upon the present information given to the Council at this meeting the Council hereby imposes the following program participation fee: (i) an amount equal to 1/4% of the principal amount of the Bonds issued for the Maple Ridge Partnership Project payable at bond closing and (ii) an amount equal to 1/8% of the outstanding principal amount of the Bonds payable annually on the an- niversary date of the bonds, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions. In the event that the federal arbitrage restrictions reduce the amount of the above program participation fee, the City Manager is authorized to change the program participation fee if he deems appropriate to a lump sum fee paid at closing in the amount set forth in the City's guidelines for housing revenue bonds. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 13 - 3/11 4 J. VISITOR PRESENTATION 1. Sam Cave a. Mr. Cave inquired if the recommendation of the Staff to connect Lakewood to Montana was also tabled. b. Councilmember Maida moved that Staff investigate the connectinq of Montana and Lakewood. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - al_l. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. H.R.C. - Appointment a. Councilmember Anderson moved to appoint Clemence Kwa ik to the Human Rela- tions Commission. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to return to previous practice + in appointing commission and bgard members. Co fission and boards are to submit at least three ( 3 ) names to the Council for appointment Seconded by Councilmember Anderson.' Ayes - all. 2. Kennard - Beam to County Road D 3. Southlawn - Cope to Highway 36 a. Councilmember Anderson questioned if the Council should initiate Public Hearings for construction of the above mentioned streets for the developers. b. Councilmember Anderson moved to initiate tax incr financing for the Southlawn and /or Kennard Streets according to Council guidelines Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Council - members Anderson and Maida Nay - Councilmember Bastian. 4. Semaphores - Cope and Highway 36 a. No discussion. 5. Parking Lots a. Councilmember Bastian commented on the parking lot and driveway at Mr. Donut and Rapid Oil, 2855 White Bear Avenue. 6. Independent Hearing Officer a. Councilmember Bastian inquired what progress has been made regarding an independent hearing officer. 14 - 3/11 7.. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Update a. Council established March 21, 1985, as the date to meet with the Planning Commission regarding the Comprehensive Land Use Plan update. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATION None. M . ADJOURNMENT 10.15 P.M. City Clerk 15 - 3/11 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Thursday, March 25, 1985 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 85 -06 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present MaryLee Maids, Councilmember Present Michael T. Wasiluk, Councilmember Absent C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of Meeting No. 85 -02 (January 28, 1985) Councilmember Maida moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 85 -02 (January 28, 1985) as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. Add J -10 - Environmental Protection 2. Junction Street - Mr. Otto 3. Maplewood in Focus 4. A.M.M. 5. Carsgroves Meadows 6. Fees, Burglar Alarms 7. Connors Cypress - Water Problems 8. I.R.B.'s 9. Sign Ordinance Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Council removed Consent Agenda Item E -3 to become Item J -11. Mayor Greavu moved, Seconded by Councilmember Bastian, Ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda Items 1 and 2 and 4 through 6 as recommended. 3/25 1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts - Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses Check register dated March 13,1985, through March 14, 1985 - $419,380.63 : Part II - Payroll Check dated March 08, 1985 - $62,835.33) in the amount of $482,225.96. 2. Application for Cancellation of Paramedic Bill Cancelled the paramedic ambulance service charges in the amount of $48.00 for Mildred Balsimo. 3. Rental Dwelling Rehabilitation Program Refer to Item J -10 4. Central Ramsey Water Management Organization Resolution No. 85 - 3 - 38 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE SIGNING OF A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF FALCON HEIGHTS, MAPLEWOOD, ST. PAUL AND ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA, ESTABLISHING AND EMPOWERING THE CENTRAL RAMSEY WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, and the Cities of Falcon Heights, Roseville and St. Paul are municipal corporations and political subdivisions of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, each city has the authority,.to manage surface waters within its boundaries pursuant to M.S.A. 412.221, Subd. 6; 444.075 and 462, 357, Subd.1; and WHEREAS, each city may jointly exercise common authority by adopting a joint powers agreement pursuant to M.S.A. 471.59; and WHEREAS, by means of a joint powers agreement, the cities may establish a water management organization pursuant to M.S.A. 473..875 to 473.883, inclusive; and .. WHEREAS, a portion of each city lies within the geographical area hereinafter referred to as the ".Central Ramsey Watershed "; and WHEREAS, each city is desirous of jointly creating a water management organization that would adopt a watershed management plan for the Central Ramsey Watershed which plan would preserve and use natural water storage and retention systems where possible, in order to: a. Reduce to the greatest practical extent the public capital expenditures necessary to control excessive volumes and rates of run -off. 2 - 3/25 b. Improve water quality C. Prevent flooding and erosion from surface flows d. Promote ground water recharge e. Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water recreation facilities, and f. Secure the other benefits associated with the proper management of surface water within the Central Ramsey Watershed. WHEREAS, a joint powers agreement has been prepared which establishes the Central Ramsey Water Management Organization. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood approves the joint powers agreement with the Cities of Falcon Heights, Roseville and St. Paul, Minnesota, to establish the Central Ramsey Storm Water Management Organization, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager and City Mayor are authorized to sign said agreement in behalf of the City of Maplewood. 5. Municipal State Aid Street Designations Resolution No. 85 - 3 - 39 WHEREAS, it appears to the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the street hereinafter described should be designated a municipal state aid street under the provisions of Minnesota Laws of 1967 Chapter 162: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Maple- wood that the road described as follows, to -wit: County Road D, White Bear Avenue - McKnight Road be and hereby is established, located and designated a municipal state aid street of said City, subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Highways of the State of Minnesota. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to forward two certified copies of this resolution to the Commis- sioner of Highways for his consideration, and that upon his approval of the designation of said road or portion thereof, that same be constructed, improved and maintained as a municipal state aid street of the City of Maplewood, to be numbered and known as municipal state aid street 120 -020. Resolution No. 85 - 3 - 40 WHEREAS, it appears to the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the street hereinafter described should be designated a municipal state aid street under the provisions of Minnesota Laws of 1967 Chapter 162: 3 - 3/25 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, that the road described as follows, to -wit: County Road D, Hazelwood Avenue - White Bear Avenue be and hereby is established, located and designated a municipal state aid street of said City, subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Highways of the State of Minnesota. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to forward two certified copies of this resolution to the Commis- sioner of Highways for his consideration, and that upon his approval of the designation of said road or portion thereof, that same be constructed, im- proved and maintained as a municipal state aid street of the City of Maple- wood, to be numbered and known as municipal state aid street 120 -010. 6. Establishment of New Budget Account Approved a budget transfer of $950.00 from the Contingency Account to establish an account to be used for the purchase of employee and committee awards pins, etc., as well as other similar items of a beneficial nature to the City and its operations. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M., Walter Street Improvement (4 Votes) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposed improvement of Walter Street from Frost Avenue to Fenton Avenue by construction of street and water mains. b. Director of Public Works Ken Haider presented the specifics of the proposal. C. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following were heard: Mr. Wayne Sachi, representing his mother, Mrs. Lillian Sachi, 1100 Frost Avenue (opposed) Mr. Sachi was informed his mother would not be assessed for this particular proposal.) Mrs. Dolores Johnson, 1101 Fenton Street (is not opposed) d. Councilmember Anderson moved to table and to instruct staff to investigate alternative financing possibilities. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson and Maida. Nay - Councilmember - Bastian 4 - 3/25 2. 7:10 P.M. Rezoning - Sloan Place a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposed rezoning of Lot 4, Block 2, Maplewood Office Center from CO Commercial office to LBC Limited Business Commercial. b. Director of Community Development Geoff Olson presented the staff report. C. Director of Community Development Geoff Olson presented the Planning Com- mission report. d. Mr. Larry Black, the applicant, spoke on behalf of the proposal. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 85 - 3 - 41 WHEREAS, Larry S. and Norman Black initiated a rezoning from CO, commercial office to LBC, limited business commercial for the following - described property: Lot 4, Block 2, Maplewood Office Center, except the South 187.72 feet thereof; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by Larry S. and Norman Black, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Com- mission on March 4, 1985. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on March 25, 1985, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 5 - 3/25 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveni- ences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 3. 7:30 P.M., Plan Amendment and Rezonings : Stillwater and Ferndale (4 Votes) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposed plan amendment and rezoning of 2633 and 2637 Stillwater Road. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Geoff Olson presented the Planning Commission recommendations. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard: Mr. Walter Miller, 2633 Stillwater f. Mayor Greavu moved to table this item until the April 8, 1985 meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson and Maida Nay - Councilmember Bastian I. NEW BUSINESS 2. Time Extension : Preliminary Plat : McKnight and Hillwood a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Maida moved approval of a one year time extension for the South Oaks preliminary plat, sub to the original conditions with condi- tion one revised to read as follows 1. Dedication of the Hillwood Drive right -of -way with Phase I as a through street. The land north and south of the right -of -way may be designated as block one, lot .seven and block two, lot one, respectively or retained as one lot - block one, lot seven. Proposed Outlet A (Phase II) shall not be shown on a final plat. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 9. District Bike Rodeo 6 - 3(25 a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved that District 622 may use the north Municipal parking lot for the bike rodeo if the casts for striping are not prohibitive and if Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) 4. 7:10 P.M. - Plan Amendment and Rezoning : Beam, Highway 61 to Hazelwood (4 Votes) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposal to amend the land use plan from SC, service commercial; RH, residential high density and OS, open space to BW, business warehousing and LSC,.limited service commercial. Rezone an area southwest of Beam Avenue and Hazelwood Street from R -1, single dwelling to BC -M, business commercial - modified. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Geoff Olson presented the Planning Com- mission recommendation. d. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following were heard: Ms. A. Behrens Jack DeSai, Uracy, Inc. e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. f. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 85 - 3 - 42 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the Maplewood comprehensive plan from OS, open space; RH, residential high density; RM, residential medium density; and SC, service commercial to BW, business warehouse and LSC, limited service commercial for the following described properties: 1. South of Beam Avenue, between Hazelwood and the tracks. 2. South of Beam Avenue, west of the tracks and east of Highway 61. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. This plan amendment was initiated.by the City of Maplewood. 2. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 4, 1985, to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an op- portunity to be heard and present written statements. The planning commission recommended to the City Council that said plan amendment be approved. 7 - 3/25 3. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on March 25, 1985. The Council considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT. RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. KSTP plans to continue to use their property for a radio tower. 2. Residential uses are undesirable near a tower, such as KSTP's, due to the television and radio reception interference that is ex- perienced. 3. The soils are poor on the KSTP property for residential use. 4. The OS, open space designation inaccurately shows that the south side of Beam Avenue cannot be developed. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. g. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 85 - 3 43 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from R - 1, residence district (single dwelling) to BC -M, business commercial- modified for the following- described property: Lot 1, Gardena Addition, lying north of County Ditch 18 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on March 4, 1985. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on March 25, 1985, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code and land use plan. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neigh- borhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 8 - 3/25 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. 5. BC -M zoning would be consistent with the proposed LSC, limited services commercial land use plan amendment for this area and the existing LSC land use plan designation to the east. 6. An appraiser's report states that this property should be used for commercial purposes. 7. Rezoning is required by state law to bring the zoning into compliance with the land use plan, where the land use plan has been amended. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 5. 7:50 P.M. - Battle Creek /Beaver Creek Tax Increment Project. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Castle Design and Development Co., Inc., for approval of a tax increment financing project for the Beaver Creek and Bettle Creek neighborhoods. b. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. C. Councilmember Bastian moved to table this matter until April 8, 1985. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. G. AWARD OF BIDS None. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Preliminary Plan : Cave's Lakewood Addition a. Director of Public Works Ken Haider presented the Staff report. b. The following persons were heard in regard to the preliminary plan: Sam Cave, the developer Julia Schwietzer, 2372 Montana Jim Mueller, 1568. Myrtle Gene Schouviller, 1616 Myrtle Curley, 2376 E. Larpenteur Cindy Ort, 1636 Myrtle Coundilmember Bastian moved to deny the preliminary plat based on the information given. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. 9 - 3/25 d. Councilmember Bastian withdrew his motion. e. Councilmember Bastian moved to approve the Cave's Lakewood Addition subject to the following conditions: 1. Arrangement must be made for a street connection, with water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer between proposed Lakewood Street and Montana Avenue. A developer's agreement for private construction or Council's ordering of the improvement must be accomplished prior to application for final plat approval. 2. Lakewood Street shall be changed to Lakewood Drive. 3. Dedication of an additional ten feet of right -of -way for Larpenteur Avenue. 4. The applicant shall enter into a developer's agreement and submit a surety for 150 percent of the cost of required improvements and tree plantings prior to application for a final plat. This agreement . shall include, but not be limited to, the following requirements: a. The corners of each lot shall be established by land survey monument. b. The center line of the Lakewood Drive pavement shall be 30 feet from the west right -of -way line. C. The accessary structures on proposed lots two and four shall be removed before the improvements are accepted by the City. 5. Final grading erosion control, drainage and utility plans must be submitted to the City Engineer for approval. These plans shall comply with the requirements of Section 9- 191(5) of the environmental protection ordinance, concerning the preservation of the maximum num- ber of healthy trees. Trees that would be removed that are two inches or greater in diameter, shall be identified on the grading plan. 6. Increase the area of Lots 2 -14, Block 2, from 9,999.6 feet to at least 10,000 square feet. 7. Omit the easements for temporary turn areas and the ponding easement. 8. Abandon the utilities easements. 9. Properties must meet F.H.A. standards. 10. Delete or reconfigure,Lots 13 and 14 east of Lakewood, Lots 13 and 14 west of Lakewood and provide a storm water area in the proximity of Lot 6 west side of Lakewood. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 2. Lakewood Drive : Montana Avenue a. Manager Evans stated that a recommended condition of preliminary plat approval for Cave's Lakewood Addition is extension of Lakewood Drive and Montana Avenue to eliminate a long cul -de -sac. It appears Mr. Cave cannot 10 - 3/25 negotiate a reasonable arrangement with an intervening property owner for the road extensions. It is therefore recommended the City Council initiate an improvement project contingent on Mr. Cave paying the cost of the feasibility study. b. Mr. Cave stated he would be willing to pay up to $2500.00 for a feasi- bility study. C. Councilmember Anderson moved to order a feasibility study for the extension of Lakewood Drive and Montana Avenue. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. I. NEW BUSINESS (Continued) 1. Plan Amendment : County Road B, Rice and Roselawn (4 Votes) a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. b. Mr. Paul Blais, representing the applicant, Mr. Schroeder, spoke on behalf of the request. C. Councilmember Maida introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 85 - 3 - 44 WHEREAS, Robert Schroeder initiated an amendment to the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan from RH, residential high density to SC, service commercial and deletion of a planned mini -park for the following- described property: South of County Road B, west of the railroad tracks and north of Roselawn Avenue; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. This plan amendment was initiated by Robert Schroeder. 2. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 4, 1985, to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said plan amendment be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on March 25, 1985. The Council considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: - 1. Commercial development would be more compatible with adjacent uses than residential. 11 - 3/25 2. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 4, 1985, to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said plan amendment be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on March 25, 1985. The Council considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. Commercial development would be more compatible with adjacent uses than residential. 2. The utilities and street access are adequate for commercial use of the area. 3. All of the property owners are in agreement. 4. A mini -park would not be required for this area, since the residential use would be deleted. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 2. Time Extension : Preliminary Plat : McKnight and Hillwood Discussed after Item F -3. 3. Authorization to Sell Tax Increment Bonds 4. Authorization to Sell Improvement Bonds 5. Castle Design Development Agreement Councilmember Bastian moved to table Items I - 3, 4 and 5 until the meeting of April 8, 1985. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 6. Crestview Drive - Hudson Place Water Main a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to order a feasibility study for the Crestview Drive improvements. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Maida. Mayor Greavu abstained. 12 - 3/25 c. Mayor Greavu moved to reconsider the previous motion. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. d. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 85 - 3 - 45 WHEREAS, it is proposed to upgrade the water system south of I -94 and north of Upper Afton Road by placing of water main in Hudson Place from McKnight Road to Sterling Street and provide service to Crestview Drive south of Hudson Place and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: That the proposed improvement be referred to the City Engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all con- venient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 7. McKnight Road Water Main and Tower a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 85 - 3 - 46 WHEREAS, it is proposed to upgrade water service to the southern portion of Water Service District No.6 by constructing water main on McKnight Road from Larpenteur Avenue to Maryland and a water tower near Stillwater and Ferndale Avenues and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: That the proposed improvement be referred to the City Engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 13 - 3/25 8. Edgerton and Roselawn Storm Sewer System a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 85 - 3 - 47 WHEREAS, it is proposed to upgrade the storm sewer system at Edgerton Street and Roselawn Avenue and provide an outlet for the pond located north of Ripley Avenue at Edgerton Street and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: That the proposed improvement be referred to the City Engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improve- ment is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improve- ment as recommended. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 9. District Bike Rodeo Discussed after Item I -2. 10. Environmental Protection. a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report. b. No action taken. 11. Rental Dwelling Rehabilitation Program a. Manager Evans stated it is proposed to reauthorize the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) and the Metro Council Housing and Redevelopment Authority Metro HRA). to offer a rental dwelling rehabilitation program in Maplewood. b. Councilmember Anderson moved to deny the rental dwelling rehabilitation program as proposed. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers I Anderson and Maida Nay - Councilmember Bastian. J. VISITOR PRESENTATION 1. Mr. Rueben Heckman, 2579 Cypress St. Mr. Heckman was informed his problem is on the agenda under Council Presentations. 14 - 3/25 K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Sign Ordinance a. Councilmember Maida questioned if there was anything in the sign ordinance that would prevent recycling block chairmen to place signs stating the date of recycling pick up. b. Staff will investigate. 2. Junction St. - Mr. Otto a. Councilmember Anderson stated Mr. Otto called questioning how deep the water pipes are. b. Staff will investigate. 3. MAPLEWOOD FOCUS a. Councilmember Anderson stated the MAPLEWOOD FOCUS Newspaper will no longer service Maplewood. 4. A.M.M. a. Councilmember Bastian brought the Council up to date on A.M.M. reports. 5. Carsgrove's Meadows - Cypress Water Problems a. Mr. Rueben Heckman stated he has experienced water problems on his property on Cypress ever since Connor Avenue was constructed. b. Mr. James Prokosch, 2571 Cypress, stated he is experiencing problems also. 6. I.R.B.'S a. Councilmember Bastian questioned if anyone had shown as interest in Maple - wood's allocation of I.R.B.'s. b. Councilmember Maida moved to establish a deadline of June 1, 1985, for any- one who wishes to apply for I.R.B.'s. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 7. Fees for Burglar Alarms a. Mayor Greavu moved to instruct Staff to prepare an ordinance eliminating permit fees for homeowners who install their own burglar alarms and place it on n Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 8. City of Moundsview a. Mayor Greavu received a letter from the City of Moundsview requesting Maplewood enter into a lawsuit with them. b. Council directed the Staff to inform the City of Moundsview to contact the 15 - 3/2,5 League of Minnesota Cities. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS None. M. ADJOURNMENT 10:40 P.M. ty Clerk bF 1^IA T 'TUAL CHIC Sr n P IL 1885 1985 CITY F 4APLEW00)CHECK REGISTER CHECK N0.DATE AMOUNT V_4DO'ITEM DESCRIPTTO' 1:2936 G4/3J/85 10,525.30 HAIITSVIL_E MF CO EQUIPMENT 3 t 1.04 /30/8 5 7*50C _I'VD S 1 D'ST LAND PURCHASE 1 u4/30/85 125 X003.'IVD.SCA 0+ST LAND PURCHASE 1 32,50n.00 1 =7M52 04/30!85 2,8b5 0 MINN FEDEOAL SNOW PLOW 2 - + tf :tt 1. ,2fA69 04/30/85 59302.50 M4&STkT__ TR_ASUR:.R LICENSE 1 2 M69 04/30/85 354.13 -MiMN STAT:, TR_ A SURER LICENSE 5 65 5.5 3 ! 12R1 :;u4/.31s/85 78 DAMS:Y COJRT COJRT FEES 78.3U 1:=5C23 ;;14/3C/35 15.33 MINN TWINS PROGRAMS 15. t 1 .5937 04/30!85 75, 7 WARDLOW T)M TR4 VEL TRAINING 75 i.bK2!04/3j/85 145 KANE ROSEMARY P/2 DEDUC 14 5.3 0 1'15 M69 04/30/85 6,j885.63 MINI STAT: TZ_AS LIC;NSC 1 5M69 04/30/85 126.30 MINN STAT= TRF4S LICENSE 1 15M69 04/30/85 273033 MINN STATr TREES LICENSE I-3M69 04/30/85 4 0 )0 M; NN STAT= TREAS LICENSE 1' LSM6?04/30/85 41803 MINV ST AT!' TR_AS LIC_NSEft 7`003.60 t ftttt* 1 6M 69 04/30/85 9 9039.) 8 MINN STAT= TR::AS LICENSE 170M69 i,4/3 85 43700 Mi NN STAT: TREAS LI.. Eli SE 9,o476.58 dp 1933 CITY OF MAPLEY0)3 CHECK RESIST =R CHECK N0.DATE A40JNT N30t ITrM DESCRIPTIO Vt6N80 4/33/85 9.54 Nosoo UTILITIES VIA N8 lull ,04/30/85 2.43 N.S.UTILITIES 13AN8C 04/30/85 2.43 1975 JTILITIES 1:04/3O/F5 2 N.S0 UTILITIES UbN80 04/30/8 =8.48 2131 UTILITIES VhNS],04/30/85 4.2 5 2145 UTILITIES 13bN80 3.4/30/85 6.38 1735 UTILITIES 13;6 N80 04 /30/35 6. " 8 2133 UTI LI TIES 41.53 + i.bU85 U4/3C/85 40.I0 UNIV IF MIVN TRAVEL TRAINING 40.30 t 127C40 34/30/85 114.50 CLE1 )= 30UIT D41 LICENSE 114.50 111"69 04133/85 9066.53 miNN 3rAT:TIEkS L N3E 1 - M6V 04/30 366033 MINV STkT=TR -'4S LICENSE 9532.50 173M69 3.4/30/85 4938T945 MN: NN STET_TRC4 S LICENSE 17AM69 04/30/85 23703 MI N4 ST AT _TR EA S LI ;ENS_ 4.594.45 1j9223-y4 /33/85 64.3.3 C41_T0* A3CT REC CONTRACT PT4 44.30 * 9938 04/3C/85 5* 724. 3 R3pIS V +JT`L T 5,724.40 * 179C47 04/30/85 1.05 C4r-L =3:CK JUDY OFFICE SUPPLIES I19C47 04/3U/85 1.11 C4E,. =3t'CK JJ3Y OFC SUPPLIES 179C47 04/30/85 25 Cw EL= 8_ CK JUDY TRA VEL TP AINING 1=k9C4 U4/30/85 6.43 C4 Elm E3ECK JJ3Y TRAVEL TRAINING I. 9C47 04/30/85 1 .''0 Cw. : 8_ 3K JUDY TR4 VEL TRAI[4,1'tiG 1';9C47 04/3J/85 1.75 C4E_:3'CK JJ3Y TR4V =L TRA1 -ING 1.9047 04/30/85 3.30 C4EL_3ECK JUDY SUPPLIES 14.56 t r- 3 V 1965 CITY OF MA PL= WOOD CHECK R E37I STE R CHECK NO.DATE aMDJNT V! 430?ITEM DESCRIPTIOI t 1%9M69 J.4/3'1/85 596529'#0 MI NN STAT= TREAS LICENSE 1'9M69 04/30/85 272.3 0 M N4 ST4T T3EAS LICENSE t 5 * 924.40 17*9M15 j4/30/85 6,977,91 m SI rREiS aE2A PERA PBL 1:a?M75 34/33/85 9,31 Be R3 -MN St tIE43 EIA P_tA '$L f 16,296.74 1l2T11 Ui /33/85 7503 STACEf 3T -rWE RE=UN3 75.1D 112 A .5 x4 /3U/85 363.0 Q FSC4 -r UNI ON DUES a9L 112A'5 4/37/85 50 AFSCM=UIII DUES PBL 369.54 t 112313 U4/30/85 2 944T JA MEs C04M.TING INSP 22J9.RS 112C35 x4/30/85 16 ,53 CTY :NT.Y :R JN10Y CREDIT UN PBL 16,151.53 1 04 /30 85 2 677.54 I "D C OMs-E C 112115 34/30/85 782041 DEFERRED CCOMO 3,460.5 12L15 44/30/85 431 .j3 LA1.7 3ANf11'GAm C04TR4COT PYM 112M2^04/30/85 13, 0 M! TR3 44STE C34TIOL SA: P9L 112M20 04/3U/85 131.'5•M_TR0 AdAST_ :O1ITROL SA aL 13 .343, ? S 112M35 04/30/85 304.?0 4N 8= N—rrir ASS3C P/R D =DUCT 304* 1953 CITY 3F MAQLEWCO)CHr-^K RE31ST =R CHECK N0.DATE AM3JNT V M331 I T M DESCRIP TIOi 1121452 04/3n/85 15 93D4.39 My F =3 .RA_ SAViN;S FWT PBL 15.004.39 * 112M61 u4/30/85 313.-]MN MJTUAL TNSURANCE PBL 313 *70 112 34/33/85 3.331 .79 MN ST :'3M4 /REV SWT P3L 8031 .79 : 1 1 2M68 04 /30/ 8 25.54 T - 4 'M Sr :T _2 _ y'VT J.= =BRED CCO - 112M68 04/30/85 18.46 M4 ST RE.T'R"K"VT OE*ERRc.3 COMO 44.73 412M69 U4/32Ip5 4,7$8.63 MI } dy STAT. T -LIENS- 112M69 4/3 /85 328.SIN N STAT; TR - AS LICE.NS_ 5,11 6.63 112M70 4 /30 /85 4 474.1 1 MPJ ST THE % S 5/.S/S -PBL 112147(3 4/30/85 4 MN ST TREAS S/S S/S P3L 8,94g.Z2 Rttttt 112T42 04/30/85 39CD".37 TELE T=RM: NALS CONTRACT PT4 3•L'D0."0 112U8^64/30/85 412.53 OMIT =3 WAY P/R D. 412.50 112W25 4/33/85 164.26 dIS: 3r REV SWT PBL 1 64.3 6 113I55 L4/3 -/85 558.59 INTL MURK-:'T SO PROGRAMS 558.59 t a 113156 4/3C'/85 47.00 INTL MARK =T SO T3URS PROGRAMS 47.]3 1131469 04/30185 5.179.]3 M:N4 STAT THE &S 'LICENSE 1131469 6 335.3 D MIN4 STAT: TREAS LIC =NSC f S 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOJJ CHECK RESISTER CHECK NO.DATE AMOJNT V :'VDD? - - --ITEM DESCRIPTI 5 t 114939 04/30/85 50.37 RICNTEj BaRB BAVauET FEE 50.00 114M69 04/30/85 25.)0 M.1 N4 STAT: TREAS LICENSE 114M69 u4/3L 26. 0•M NV STAT= TREAS LICENSE 114M69 4/3 ^!85 50490 M & TN4 ST4T: TR =AS LICENSE 114"69 04/30/85 551.33 MTNN sr AT TR AS LICENSE 114M69 U4/30/85 1g..0 MINV STAT:. TRE4S LICENSE 1141M69 04/30/85 2600 MINV STAT: TRE4S LICENSE 1141M69 04/30/85 296030 MIN4 STAT: TREAS LIC* NSE 6,740. 114P,30 c"4/3C/85 29 175.33 QET =t S34 3--RETAINER fRt!!f 11 594 'J.4/30f85 83033 L'RACI WT -_I %±4 REFUNJ 83.3 115941 4/30/85 13930 8033= :-4R3L REFUNO 13.33 115942 W4/ 30/85 26.`Q CITY 3F BR30KLYN REFUND 26010 • 115943 x4/30/85 16.45 8:-'HM LOIS REFUND 16.45 * 115C4U 4130/85 CLE-1K 7F C?URT D41 LTC PBL 84. J 7 115M2U 04/30/85 2 MN St TRE4S SURTAK SURTAX PBL 11 5M2J 04/30/85 44.49•MN ST TREI > SUR SURTAX PBL 115M69 0 3,52 9 MI N4 ST4T= TREAS LICENSE 115M69 04/30/85 1330?3 MINK ")TAT: TREAS LICENSE 3,628.19 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOO)NECK REGTST:R CIECK N0.D4 TE AMOUNT V= ND01}I TE M DES :RIPT: C 115S46 04/30185 12.?0 S31. TESTINGI LA3 SOIL TESTING 116080 u4130/85 53.15 MJ'VICI'A_S REFUND 53.15 115M69 X4/33/85 79553.53 MI NN ST1T= TREAS LICENSE 116169 04/30/85 332.30 MINN STAT= TREAS L; ENSE 7, 882.63 119554 04 /30!85 l 0194 *37 BANV =R =I3 r. WORKS PROGRAMS 1194.37 119/57 j4/30/85853 /1 9g52 S„M11 T , T ER FtR_41RKS PROGRAMS 1852.41 t 11 u4/30/85 159.94 LA 8__L=S 3FFICc SUPPLIES 159.94 119M69 4/30/85 6 MAIN4 ST T? =AS LICENSE 119M69 04/30/85 4129»MIINV ST TR=AS LI CENSE b,583.g4 119583 0 4/30 85 129• ^0 ST M74N DICUMENT S'C BOO 120944 04/30/85 513.)0 LITTL: Six 31NGO PROGRAMS 51393 123060 04/30/85 53930 CRASJ.N5 C34F TRAVEL TRAINING 50913 120M69 04 /30/85 11 ?68975 MAINV ST T2 AS LICEN3"E 12OM69 04 /3j/85 30D9)0 M; NN ST TI _AS LICENSE t 3 i t 1. 4 t t t t t E i t NECESSARY EXPENDITURES- SIC- LAST CT`1CIL `1EETJ- P119cy 1983 CITY JF MAPLEWJO)HECK RESIST =R CHECK N3. 3 Tr AMOJNT V =430)IT` M DESCRIPT D 119368.75 179 ,FJID 31 T3TAL GENERAL 132 ,v500e30 FU43 11 TOTAL PARK DEVELOPMEN 24989 FU41-90 TOT4L S4N.ITART SEWER 14,593,81 FM 92 TOTAL PArRDLL BENEFIT 139393. 70 FJV]6 WAL V= 4ICLE t EQUIP 539020of 5 TOT %L NECESSARY EXPENDITURES- SIC- LAST CT`1CIL `1EETJ- e ACCOUNTS. PAYABLE MAY. 13- Page 1 i 1955 CITY OF MA PLEYOOD CHECK REGISTER t CHECK N09 DATE _._. ____ .AMOUNT VE NDO? _..- __. __ITEM DESCRIP TTON 133006 05/32/85 15 *00 MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS MEMBERSHIP 133016 05/02/85 700 BRENNAM MAlJREEN REFUND t 133020 U5/02/ 5 7•00 SNYD R SHkRDN REFUND 7 05/BUR A Pt NT 133042 0:5/02/85 250.18 LAKELAND ENVELOPE ENVELOPES 250.78 133047 05/02/85 100000 NO ST PAUL MAPLEVOOD CONTRIBUTION 1DP.'0 I 133051 05/02/85 226.56 NORTNEfbN HYDRAULICS SUPPLIES 133c751 05/02/85 149.95 NORTHERN btYDRAULICS SUPPLIES 133051 05/D2/85 239,0 NnRTIER'N HrDRAULI CS SUPPLI ES 133051 05/02/85 97500 NORTHERN HYDRAULICS SUPPL ES 1 9 590.41 * _ 1 05 5 !t f 3 E SUP 3 • 020 133061 05/02/85 4000 GLASS CLINIC INC SUPPLIES 40.00 * 153U62 05/02/85 5.90 LI4OLEUM SALES CO SUPPLIES t 5.90 * 133v 72 05/02/85 9.95-SIERRA CLUB BOOKS 133072 05/021-85 51925 SIERRA CLUB BOOKS t 4200 t 133074 05/02/85 9.52 VAN 0 LITE BCOKS p4: Q6 t I 1985 CITY OF MAALEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK N0.DA _ _._. -__A ITEM DESCRIPTIO1 9.5 2 • 133096 05/02/85 7400 INDEHAR1 LINDA REFUND 7.01 133091 05/021 -6906 - -._A•1 BUSIN_SS MACHINE _SUPPLIES _ 133091 05/02/85 6906 A -1 BUSINESS MACHINE SUPPLIES 133U97 05/02/85 4B.00 A -1 3USINc.SS MACHINE CONTRACT PVM 133U97 0.5/02/85 48,00 A•1 SUSIN =SS MACHINE CONTRACT TYM 133U97 05/02/85 123003 A•1 3UST;NSS MACHINE CONTRACT FYM 13309T 05/021-85 14400 A•1 BUSINESS MACHINE.CONTRACT FYM 133097 Q5/C2/85 48.0D A-1 BUSINESS MAC41ME CONTRACT PYM 133U97 05/02/85 14440 A-1 BUSINESS MACHINE CONTRACT fYM 133097 05/02/ 5 92000 A -1 3USIN;.SS MACHINE CONTRACT PYM 133097 0.5/02/85 48.00 A - BUSIN_SS MACHINE CONTRACT FYM 133j97 5/02/85 4800 A -1 3USINSS MACHINE.CONTRACT PYM 1331197 05/ Z/85 48.00 Aml BUSIN ESS MACHINE CONTRACT FYM 929012 133098 05/02/85 24700 AMr; PUBLIC WIRKS MEMBERSHIP 247.00 f 1331UD 05/02/85 15.00 CITY ENG ASSOC OF MN MEMBERSHIP 15.00 133107 0,5/02185 2010!10 NATL SIC PIROFF ENS MEMBERSHIP 201.0!' 133125 05/0a'/85 29290.05 CORPORNTE RISK MANG CONTRACT FYM 2929000 133151 0.5 /02'/$5 Boi -FRISKY PETS SUPPLIES 13319T 05/02/85 _ _70 _BURF =I ND MARY EyT INSTRUCTOR 70.65 1332-32 05/02/85 7000 JOMNS ON MZ C NA EL REFUND 7.00 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO.DATE ._._ _......__ _._ _ _.._AMOUNT.-.._...___ -_.. __ _____-ITEM DESCRIPTIOP, 1332j?05/02/ - 85 .M.3,D _MCCAllYN ASSOC INC FEES SERWICE 580.00 133224 05/02/85 7000 TOBIN CRERYL REFUND 133271 05/02/85 10.50 NORTHWEST FABRICS SUPPLIES 10.50 f 133272 05/02/85 40.00 RE IMER PAT REFUND 0000 = t: 133285 15/02 /$ 5 700 DREM_ R G WE N E REFUND 7.0.0 133290 05/02/85 1 97t4.i 5 PARKER PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 1. 7'84 ,1 5 133314 05/CZ/85 22.34 EKBLAD PARDEE CONTRACT PTM 133314 05/02/85 12.00 EKBLAD PARDEE CONTRACT fTM 34o 3D 133354 05/02/85 1914600 CARLSON EOUIPMT SUPPLIES 104600 133359 05/02/85.131.76 GOODUE&R AUTO SERY SUPPLIES 131.76 133 381 05/02'/85 29000 NA TL AUTOMOBILE MEMBERSHIP 29900 133432 05/02/85 17000 SCHN:IDER CATHERINE REFUND 13305 05/02/85 20.0a VARDA ALARM SUPPLIES t 1985 CITY 3F MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK N0.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTIO1 tQ.O s 133408 05/02/8.5 625.30 CENTURY FENCE SUPPLIES 625.30 153419 05/u2/85 25 9DO SA NY3 BUSINESS SUPPLIES 25.00 133420 05/ij2/85 19725oDD MADSEN KLOSTER REFUND 1 * 725.0.0 133424 05/02/7 ENZ P4MELA REFUND 7.00 lk 133449i 0.5/02/85 7010 LEVERT.1 DAVE REFUND 133458 05 /Z / 85 7.l0 LUTZ LUNDA RE= UND 7.00 133 462 05/02/85 1090D MILLER LEONARD 133462 133473 05/02/52.0 0 MA PL; WD 04 KDA LE PRINT SUPPLIES 52. X10 133476 0 5/02/t5 10.00 MN HERNETOLOSICAL MEMBERS "IP 133493 05/02/85 47.30 GREENBERG IMPLEMENT SUPPLIES 47.30 133495 05/02/85 7.70 HANSON CATHY REFUND 7.0 1955 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK HQ•DATE __ _._ ..AMOUNT _...__ _._VaNDO1.1 ITEM DESCRIPTIO' 133503 05/02/85 47.10 PAY:tTE is AN -- _REFUND 133503 05/02/85 62.80 PAYEITE J=AN REFUND 109.90 133504 05/02/85 47.10 PAYETTE GREGORY REFUND 47.10 133555 05102/85 420.00 BRACKE LOJIS CONTRACT PYM 420.30 tttRtRtt 133614 05/02/85 33.50 KERR ASSOIATEO BLOKS 33.50 133643 35/02/85 9,00 GINKEL GENE REFUND 9.00 133657 05/02/85 40964 ST PAUL DISPATCH PUBLICATION. 4 ^.64 cif 133 71 1 05/02/85 14000 STAVSVrCK RUTH REFUND 14.0 133714 05/02/85.110 110 VALEK JOAN J REFUND 11 . l0 133725 U5/U2/85 14995 ARCHITECTURAL ALL CONTRACT PYM 149959.51 133727 05/02/85 7 * 00 BZGHLEY GWEN REFU 7.:'Q 13313U 05/02/85 75.fir'DEE JAY GZ &PHICS ARTWORK 75.r, 0 133754 05 /Qt /85 7 .R.0_NOVAK MARILIM REFUND t 199 CITY OF MAPL EWOOD CHECK REGI STER CHECK N0.DATE AMOUNT _VENDOR ._ _ - -___ --TEM DESCRSPTIO 7.OIi mot* :• 1338L1 05/0.2/435 _5C, .3 0 BQEN`MAN 3 O SPEAKER 5n.n -a 133816 05/02 /-85 344.50 SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH SUPPLIES 344.50 133965 0,5/02/8 5 7000 L AINE JOAV M REFUND 133866 05/02/85 184 o0.0 MCNULTr JOHN J SUPPLIES 1$4 . 133871 05/02/85 12.95 SKALMAN D04 SUPPLIES 12.95 133885 5/02/85 163.14 MIDWAY UNIFORMS UNIFORMS 160.14 * 13VK9T 05/021`85 35.00 JOHN RANI%K CANINE ALLOWANC 35.G0 * i 133917 0-5/02/85 158.41)MA 1P 5 dE R INC CONTRACT PYM 188.40 13305 05/0x/85 20.81 AT 9 T TEL EPRDNE 133A75 05/02/85 5.36 AT 6 T TELEPHONE 133A75 0 71 .91 AT 9 T TELrPHON E 133A75 65102/2.26 AT 9 T TELEPHONE 133A75 05/02/85 _6E AT & T TELEPHONE 133A75 05/02/85 8,0.4 AT 9 T TELEPHONE 13 3 A75 05/02185 5.36 AT A T TELEPHONE 133A75 05/02/85 13.96 A7 A T TELEPHONE 133A75 C 5/0?/85 1 42.1 0 AT 9 T TELEPHONE 133A75 05/02/85 75,56 AT 6 T TELEPHONE 13305 05/02/85 2.613 AT & T TELEPHONE 133A75 05/02 /-8-5 SoC2 AT 8 T TEL:.P }ON 13305 35/02/85 3 6 ol L'AT 4 T TELE'tiw"lE V 19F3 CITY OF MAPLE WOOD CHECK REGISTER CNEC K N0. DA TE -AMOUNT --VEND01 13 ITEM DESCRIPTION 3 A T 5 L5 102 / 8 5 2 T. G,b A7 b133AT50S/42/8S 96.6a AT 9 f T T£LE-p"DNE 13 3 A 7 5 13 3A T 5 0 5 /02 /-8 5 32.31 AT b T TEL EPHD N E 13 3 A T5 05/02/85 22.34 AT &T TELEP NO NE 5 /C2 / 85 .2.68 A T &T T cL '_ °!Q N 133A75 133AT5 05/02/85 16 *C4 AT 9 T T£LEPMONZ 05/02/8 5 26ol T AT b T TELEPHOWF 133A75 133;, T5 0 5/32/85 AT b T TELEP"DNE 133A75 C 5 /G2 /85 35.e8l581 AT &TEL AE0HV'E 133A75 5 /a /PS Q 5/02118 5 5.36 2 A &T tELt:p+Q "y' T = CPHON E 133A75 133A75 05/02/85 2 •6R68 AT 4 AT b T T TELEPHONE 3.5/02/85 2 •b8 AT b TELEPHONE 133A75 05/02'!85 2.68 AT &T T =L EP 1NE 133A75 05/92/,65 6.89 AT d T N{flE 1 029.42 *TEL EPHIONE 1j3A92 05/02 /,Q5 1 •17b.l-0 AUTOC4N IyDUSTR IBS MAI NT19176 •n0 * 133815 05/02/85 56.1 6 BATTERY TIRE WlJdSE SUPPIFS86.16 733827 05/02/85 148.50 SE'RC TOR S. TN SUPPLIESiS148.50 * 733845 133845 05/02/85 C5/02/85 28'.10 12012 BOARD OF W# TER COMM SUPPLIES 133B45 05/02/85 6.48 BOARD OF WATER COMM SUPPLIES 133B45 05/02/85 1, BEAR OF WATER COMM SUPPLIES 13 3645 05/02/85 _94 - -. -.S.' 0 BOARD BOARD OF iA'TER COMM Q SUPPLIES 111 .64 4 WATER CMM RESET METER 133848 05/02/85 _47.39 HDYCR TRU^K P=ARTS SUPPLIES47.39 133C26 C5 /0a /8S 56.Q0 CANVAS PR00 REPAIR SUPPLIES56.GD _ * 133038 133038 05/02/85 ps /02/{ 5 4 IECL _A!V STED RUGS SUPPLIES CLEAN STEM RUGS SUPPLIES r i 13303 133040 133044 mot••* 133D46 133D46 133012 133E06 05/02/85 as /oa /5 U 5/02 /.85 D 5/02/85 05/02/85 05/02/85 u 5/02/85 6'56 DALCO SUPPLIES6,56 l V 196'5 CITY OF MAPLE WOO D DEPT OF PUBLIC SFTY SDFTWARE 14AINT 6D.00 60.00 * CH:CK REGISTER CHFCK N0.DATE _AMOUNT VEN003 ITEM 'D_SCRIPTIOt DIRECTOR 3F PROPERTY ASSESSMENTS 98.60 • DIRECTOR OF PROPERTY ASSESSMENTS 81622 DOSTER SALES 133055 U.5/02/85 18 COPY DUPUCATINF DUPLICATING cos, EAST COUNTY LINE FUEL43.11 +r 133056 133056 35/OZ /P5 05/02 /85 54609 COLLINS EL:CTR CI REPAIR MA ;NT 133056 05/02 33•15 345.•x. fl CJLLI'S ELECTRIC T. _A IN 924.24 COLL..IS ELECTRIC EP AI R MAIhT 133C51 133C58 95/02/85 C5/02/ 17 5`02 COPY EOUI'ME4T INC JP cSPL _E.. 133C5P 05/ 5 86.08 CORY EDUItINrNT INC SUPPLIES 133133C58 05!022 /8/85 436,30 COoY EQUIL%MENT INC COPY EQUIPMENT INC SUPPLIES 544.70 :SUPPLIES 133C9C U5/v2/85 2903 COUNTRY CLUB St1PPL.ES29.13 t 13303 133040 133044 mot••* 133D46 133D46 133012 133E06 05/02/85 as /oa /5 U 5/02 /.85 D 5/02/85 05/02/85 05/02/85 u 5/02/85 6'56 DALCO SUPPLIES6,56 165.00 165,00 + DEPT OF PUBLIC SFTY SDFTWARE 14AINT 6D.00 60.00 * DI CTAPHONZ.MAT NT CONTRACT 59039.45 4973704 DIRECTOR 3F PROPERTY ASSESSMENTS 99776.59 DIRECTOR OF PROPERTY ASSESSMENTS 81622 DOSTER SALES SUPPLIES81.22 : 43.11 EAST COUNTY LINE FUEL43.11 +r P4 P y 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK N00 DATE _AMOUNT _. _VENDOR . __ _ ..ITEM DESCRIPTIO' 133EO7 13 3EU 7 05/02'/$5 05 /02 /* 5 34.46 34.4 b EASTMAN K30AK CO DUPLICATING G DS 133EJ7 G5/02185 109.72 EASTMAN K3DA K CO EASTMAN KODAK CO DUPLICATING DUPLICATING133E -71 0.5102/85 272959 EASTMAN K33AK CD DUPLICATING133EU? 133EU7 05/02/85 234.99 EASTMAN KODAK CD DUPLICATING 133Eu 7 05/02/85 05/02/65 34.46 EASTMAN KODAK CO DUPLICATING COS 133EU7 0.5/02/85 310.' 9 222.46 EASTMAN KODAK CD EAST K33AK CO DUPLICATING COS OUPLICATING 1 , v253033 +COS' 133E90 05/02/85 225.DD, _EVANS BAR .RY VEHICLE ALL31iAN4 225.00 + 133FJ 5 05/02185 8000 FAUST DANIEL TRAVEL TRAINING 8.0C 133F4ti ,;05/02/85 174094 FLAGROUSE PROGRAMS 174.94 : 133645 133G45 U5/C2/85 05/02/85 44.50 GOODYEAR TIRE CO GOODYEAR REPAIR MAINT VET 133645 05/02/85 32.75 21.00 TIRE CD GOODYEAR TIRE CO REPAIR MAINT VE} REPAIR MAINT VEf133G4505/02/85 29000 6300YEI;R TIRE CO REPAIR MAINT VEf133G4505/02/85 5.11 GOODYEAR TIRE CD REPAIR MAINT WE 132.36 mot * 133G55 05/02/85 1000.0 G.F.D.BOOK 10000 + 133G57 0.5/02/85 MOD GRACE OUAVE C C3NSULTING INSP 390.10 + 13 3 G58 05102 /i8 5 1029 GREW JANET SUPPLIES133G5805/02/85 1.99 GQEW JANET SUPPLIES133G5815/02/85 2081 GREY JANEt SUPPLIES 6.09 + 133G63_05/02/85 540ol1 GRUBERS NOW PLA E2UIPMENT 543031 x. 1985 CITY OF MAP.EW00D CHECK REGISTER CHECK N0.DATE _ _ _.__AMOUNT V =yDp ITEM DESCRIPTIO 133126 t5 /02 /85 15.0D INNcRLINE i 75* D.0 CON TRACT PY 13 3 U5 0 05/02/B5 4 Q 2 0000 J THO MACS 4 THLECTICS PROGRAMS SUPPLI4X020o0.0 133K11 05/02/8-5 24.9T KfMART 24.9T f SUPPLIES 133K55 133K55 05/02/85 05/02/85 161.4 172 92 KNOX LU48 =R SUPPLIES 133K55 05/02/:85 0 26.36 KNOX LUMBER KNOX LUMB =R SUPPLIES 359,69 SUPPLIES 133K7G 05/02/t5 305 :39 -RC EBS ENT-RPRISES SUPPLIES lIEH305.39 f 733L21 05/02/85 62.04 LAKELAND = ORO SUPPLI YEh62.0 4 : 1 133L28 05102/85 3500 LANG Ri CH4RD SUPPLIES 11EH35030 : 13332 133L32 05/02/85 _ CS /O2 /95 89.95 85,00 LAW ENFORCEMENT EtUP SUPPLIES RANGE 4 1 x'4.95 LAW ENFOR EMENT EQUP SUPPLIES RANGEf 13303 05IO2 /185 7000 LANG pEGSY REFUND7.00 : 133L86 ..0 S /02/85 - _94.20 LUKIN STEtt.. N EMT INSTRUCTOR94.20: 133MU5 05/02/85 75.80 MB SUPPLY SUPPLIESTS.BD ,r 1955 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO*DATE _ . _ __.AMOUNT ITEM OESCRIPTIOf 133M14' 133M14 05/02/85 05/02/85 136.5$MAPLEWOOD REVIEV PUBLISHING 133M14 05/02/85 69.50 22104 MAPLEWDOD REVYEQ MAPLEWOOD REVIEW PUBLISH1NG PUBLTS%ING133105/02/85 36.40 MAPL =WOOD REVIEW PUBLISHING464.32 13 3 r79 0 5/02 /"8 5 13.5 5 MN UC FUN)E DMPE NSA T ION 13.55 133M94 890 *214 --M R.SI6N -SUPPLIES 890.28 133NJ2 05/0a/85 28.38 NADEAU EDWARD TRAVEL TRAINING 133N3G U- 5/02/85 53.10 NORTM ST PAUL CITY UTILITIES133N3C05/02/:85 19385.77 NORTJ ST PA4L CITY UTILITIES 1.438.%7 133N50 133N50 05/03/85 05/03/85 45.38 51.54 NORT4WESTER N BELL TELEPHONE 133N50 US/02/85 234.68 N0RT4WrSTERN BELL NORTHIEST_RN B_LL TELEPHONE TELEPHONE133 i33N5 05/03/85 GS 103185 31.20 NORTgWSST =RN BELL TELEPHONE 133N50 G5/03/85 1912208 3.80 N0RT4WESTER N BELL TEL EPHOIN 133 %50 05/03/15 M22 NORTyWrST:RN BELL NORTHWESTER h BELL TELEPHONE TELEPHONE1331450 133N5' 03/03/85 05/ ^3/85 56.50 NORTgWESTAR H BELL TELEPHONE 13 3145 0 5/0 3/ 8 5 30.76 5'9 *U T N3RTRW =ST -RN BELL NOR r -1 W S TERN BELL TEL =PHONE TEL EPHON E133N5035/03/ , 85 67.69 NORTHwEST_2 N BrLL TELEPHONE1331450 133N50 05/02/85 05/0.3/85 36.90 NORTMWrSTERN BELL TEL EP4i`NE 13'3N50 05/x3/85 49.1 8 84.38 NIRT-IWEST = N BELL TEL = PyON: 133N50 05/02/ -?5 3.13. Q0 NORT4W .50TERN BELL NORTAWEST R N BELL TELEPNON= TEL133N50 133N50 05/03/85 05/0,3/85 17.01 NIRTOWESTER N BELL TELEPHONE 1331450 05/03/85 13.1 5 56922 NDRTiW =ST_R N 8rLL TELEPHONE 133%50 05/02/'95 1 NORTHWEST ERIN aFLL N0RTrlWE ST =RN 8 TEL EPH0 -NE TELEPHONE1331450 133N50 05/02 /85 05/03/85 38.90 NORTPWrISTERN BELL TEL EP!aONE 133N50 05/02/85 302.92 39000 N0RTIrEST RN BELL TELEPHONE 133N5U D5 3 1.8 5 19033900 NnRTNWESTERN BELL NORTi N.ST =R N BELL TEL EPH3NE TELZP'?4N E133%50 1331450 05/02/85 GS /G.3 /85 359,01 N')oT% BELL TrIEPHW; 63.23 NO3RT4WESTERN BELL r TELEPHONE 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHEC K N09 DATE --AMOUNT VE R001 ITE OESCRIPTIO' 133N50 133N50 05/03/$5 QS/03/85 13.95 Nt3RTNWE'ST =RN SELL TELEPHONE 133NSC 05/03/85 x'4.23 _ 65.1 4 NJRTHiESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 133N5U 05/03/85 51e54 NJRTMWEST:.R N BELL TELEPtONE 133ASJ 05/03/85 51.54 NoRT4WEST_R N BELL TELEPHONE 133N50 05 fV3/85 51 NORTHW_ST- R N BELL TELEPHONE L 133N50 05/02 /85 54 50,16 NORT BELL TELEPHONE 133N50 05/0 3/85 51954 NORTMWESTER N BELL TELEPHONE 133k!5U 05 /Q3 /85 - _. --5154 NORTIWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 133N 50 05/"3/85 13, 95 NCRTHW N BELL TELEPHONE 133N50 05/02/x5 15.20 N RTH WES' =R N NORTOWEST_RN BELL BE T 133N50 133N50 05/02/$5 05/03/85 111 . 69 N0RT4WEST_RN LL BELL TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 133N50 05/0.3185 53.35 30.'P4 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 133N5L 05/03/85 14.86 NaRTH WESTER N 8E1. L TELEPHONE 133150 05 /03 /85 13.95 NORTMWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 133150 p5/03/85 ib.11 N04T y 4E ST =I N BELL TEL * P ETEL - i ©N_ 133N50 05 f02 /BS 67.95 NRT PESTER N BELL TELEPHON E 133'450 05/03/85 11 .7 S H . RTN *rSTm-SELL TELEPHONE 133150 C5/C2/85 81 NORTHWEST,RN BELL TELEP14QNE 133N50 05/02/85 AD 89. ?S NIRTHWESTERN BELL TEL= PH'NNE 133N50 05/D3/85 13'95 NORT4WESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 133N5D 05/03185 13.0 5 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 4901.SL t NJ9T4 WEST-RN BELL TELrp ON r 133N80 i33lV8C 05/03/11 5 5/03/85 3136.77 N.S.P.UT ?CITIES 133N8 133NR0 L' 5/03/85 9.36 930 *51 11. S. 31t. NS o UTILITIES U5/03/85 257,1.0 N a UTILITIES 133N80 C5/03/:05 1 9012.45 N•s•po UTILITIES 133N80 133N60 05/03/85 35o45 UTILITIES 5/13/85 37.81 N. S. UTILITIES 133r8D 05 /03/?5 72.98 A#. 5. UTILITIES 13318"15 /03/ 8 5 104.24 N.S.P. UT.I LI TI E S 133NRD tj5/03/85 69185.94 A•S' , UTZ I.TIES 133180 05 /03/85 79.5 4 N. S.P.UTj CITIES 1331'8" 133N80 C5 /03 /85 t3.S3 4.5.x. UTILITIES C5 3 A ' S ' P ' UT:LIT:tS 133180 Q5 /03/85 113.13 N. S.a. UTj LITIES 133180 1331 t.5/03/85 114.62 lV.S.. UTILITIES u5/03/85 76.4i N.S.Q. UTILITIES 133Ng0 n5 /C'3 /RS UTILI TIE S 133N$C. 133NRt! 05/03/85 U5/03/85 Q p' SoP0A ' S ' PS ' UTILITIES UTZtZTTES 133% 8J LAS /03/85 x''30 1Q1.6D N.S.Q.UTILITIES 133r. 80 133N8J 4SI0.3/85 - - -4.25 N.S.Q. A.S.P. uTiLiTiES 45 /03/85 17.00 N SQ UTiLITI 13 3 A 8J 5 /"3 /8 5 10'.55 N. S.'. UTI LZTIc S 133150 1S3ftR0 US/03/85 4.25 Nt.S.. UTIL_TIES 05/n.3/P.5 4.25 N. UTILITIES 133!RO Y X5/03/85 6.)3 ti S•Z• UTILITIES 1 3 CS /3/85 46.41 N.S.* UTILITIES 133NSU 05/03/8538.81331Y80 N•S• ' Z ESUTorL. ITUTILITIES r- PA e : 13 C t t f 19E-5 CITY OF MAPLEWflOp CHECK REGISTER CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT .._VE1100R ITEM DFSCRIPTZO 133N80 13 3 N80 16,5/03/85 05/C3/-85 b.73 15'D3 H.S. P .UTILITIES 133Nfs0 05/0 3/85 5 N.S.P, _.- -UTILITIES 133NR 15 /±'313 5 34' 6 S.p. N.S.Q.UTILITIES 133N80 133N80 x5/03/85 Z1iR52 N.S.a.UTI L1TI;.S 133Nts0 05/03/'85 05/03/85 324.3b N.S.P.UTILITIES UTILITIES 133100 45/03/85 x 231 /7 N.S. +.UTILTTIES 133N80 05/03/85 168.82 N,St.S. a. _ a UTILITIES 133N80 133N80- 05/03/85 95.39 NOS. a UTI LITIE S 133NRO 05/03/85 C 5/(3/85 21 7.34 i.UTILITIES UTIL'TIE S 1331k,R2 U5/03185 134.59 214.Fi0 N. S.'.UTILITIES 133N80.05/03/ -85 14 .Q w ! » saga N.S.°UT 133180 133N8 C5 /03/85 1 ib.82 1Y.S.!.UTZLI TZ iS 133N80 1;5/03/85 05%03/85 218.63 NOS.a.UT. L2 T: E S UTILITIES 133%80 5/ 0 3 l 5 9.29 _.. 18 7. R'9 N.S.P. N S. 2 UTI Li T I c`S 133NBO 133N8 05/C3/85 122.83 O N.S.Pw CTalLT&T . ,c S 05/C3/85 B1.57 N.S..'.UTI LITIFS UTILITIESTZLZTIzS 133N95 05/02 /$5 600 NUTES OK LAIIERNE TRAVEL TRAZNIN66. 9.0 : 13 3P4L 133R40 CS /Ot /8 5 05/02/85 52.1 b PN ^T0S TO 00 SUPPL:FS4.65 56.81 PNOT JS TO 60 SUPPLIES 133P42 05/C2 /S5 34.10 PTCKWICK DISC 8KS34.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 133P45 QS / ©2 /F 5 - t 31':3.7D P.TN Y B OW_S 318.' 0 CONTRACT PYM 133P66 05/02/85 401)PROTECT• AIRS4.00 +SUPPLIES 133P67 05/02/85 76.50 PR0F:SS OEM 4 L PROCESS AM8 RUNS76o50 133RD9 133RO9 05/02/$5 05/02/85 19468.5D RA PS= Y COUNTY CONTRACT PYM541. B7 RAMS = Y COJNTY CONTRACT PYM Lo 1995 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK H0.DA TE AMOUNT . -V E 40 OR ITEM DESCRIPTIOP 133Rd 9 03/021M 61 *lB2 RAMSEY COUNTY CONTRACT PYM 133RJ9 0.5/02/85 648*05 RAPSrY COUNTY CONTRACT #YM 133RJ9 05/02/.85 19125*40 RAMSOEY COUNTY CONTRACT PYM 133RU9 05/02/85 1710090*00 RAMS:Y COUNTY CONTRACT PYM v135*64 133R39 05/02/85 804 RTCHARDS SUPPLTES 0*34 133949 05/02/8 19.40 ROAD R ONS C UEE SUPPLIES 133R49 05/02/85 191o40 ROAD RESCUE SUPPLIES 133R49 05/02/85 36.33 ROAD RESCUZ SUPPLIES 133R49 05/012/85 54or.0 ROAD RESCUE SUPPLIES 30103 133850-05/02/85 593*27 BONS PRINTTNS SUPPLIES 593*27 133SU2 05102/65 3o15 SAD LOCK 9SAFE SUPPLIES 133SL)2 05/02/85 IF0211 S&D LOCK &SAFE SUPPLIES 20.35 13353 05/02145 105*26 S 9 T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 133SO5 15/02/85 99071 S 9 T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 133515 05/01f85 I1o24m S IL T 0FFlArlCE OFFICE S U4:PL icS 133S C5/02/85 16*21 S &T OFFICE OFF ICE SUPPLIES 133S,35 05/02/25 13*84 s 9 T OFFICE OFFICE S UPPL IES 133SU5 0,5/02/85 33*25 S A T 0 F F C E OFFICE SUPPLIES 133SU5 05/02/65 5*57 S 9 T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 133SU5 05/0a/7068 S 9 T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 133 SnLj 3 05/02/85 17*41)S 9 T 0 F F'-9'-C E OFFICE SUPPLIES 133SD5 05/02/95 24*86 s &r OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 133SJ5 05/02/-85 34*92 S 9 T OFFICE OFFICE. SUPPLTirS 133SU5 05/02/85 2600 S &T OFFICE OFFICE SU.FPL lv*S 13 3'S0 5 x5/02 /'85 2*78 S 9 T OFFT-10E OFF IT C E: S UPPL-A.;-s l.s3S05 05/02/8-5 34m ?0 S 9 T OFFICE.OFFICE SUPPI 133SI5 05/02/85 12080 S 9-T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 133SU5 b5/02f85 3o16 S &OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 133Su5 05/02/85 10021 0 9 ar OFFICE OFF—CE: SUPPL:r'c 133SO5 05/52/85 20en S 9 T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPL:T'S 133S)5 05/02/85 24987 S 9 T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 133SU5 05MM5 30*40 S 9 T OFFICE OFFICE SUFPLIES 13 3SJ 5 05/U2/85 350*7D S L T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 133SO5 05/02/85 350o70 s &r OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 19165.10 l 1985 CITY OF MAPLE WOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK N0.DATE _ - ---- - -....AMOUNT..V:NDO?ITEM DESCRIPTION 133S3U 05/02/65 132.10 _ _SEARS #8412 ___SUPPLIES 133S30 05/02/85 40* ?$SEARS $8412 SUPPLIES 133S30 35/02/85 44.52 SEARS 08412 SUPPLIES 217.4 © 133S55 05/02/85 43600 SPECIALTY RADIO SUPPLIES 436.GO 133S58 05/02/85 113.50 ST PAUL CITY OF CONTRACT PYM 133S58 05/32/85 441.60 ST PtUL CITY OF CONTRACT PYM 133S58 05/02/f5 111.73 ST p4UL (LTY OF CONTRACT FYM 133S58 05102/55 56.45 _ST PAUL CITY OF CONTRACT PYM 728.28 133S59 05/02M 10.17 STAPLES PAULI NE SUPPLIES 133S59 05/02/t5 25000 STAPLE'S IPA ULTN FUEL OILf13355905/O2/iB5 25. [STAPLES PhULINE FUEL OIL 133S70 0 5/02/t 5 199 STANDARD SPG ALIGN MAINT WEN 199.49 f 133S84 05/02/85 35.00 STEF-,N S :OTT CANINE ALLOWANCE 35.CO mot• * *: 133S90 05/02/85 1.41'SUPERAMERICA SUPPLIES 133S90 95/02/85 _15050 SUPERAMERICA FUEL OIL 133S90 05/02/$5 15.75 SUPERAMERICA FUEL OIL 133S90 05/02/95 70906 SUPERAMERICA FUEL OIL 133590 G5/02/85 _40D097 SUPERAMERICA FUEL OIL 133S90 15/02185 10.51)SUPERAMERICA FUEL OIL 133S90 0 13.20 SUPERAMERICA FU= L OIL 133S90-05/02/85 15.00 SUPERAMERICA FUEL OIL 133S90 05/02/85 1 T.50 SUPERAMERICA FUEL OILf133S9095/02/85 16.42 SUPERAMERICA FUEL OIL 133S9Q 05/02/B5 1'T.24 SUPERAMERICA FUEL OIL 133S90_05/02/85 7.50 SUPE14MERICA FUEL OIL 133S90 05/02/85 1T.50 SUPERAMERICA FUEL OIL 133S90.05/02/85 2500 SUPERAMERICA FUEL OIL 133S90 05/02/385 30.52 SUPEI AMERICA FUEL OIL 133590.05/02/85 26.56 SUPERAMERICA FUEL OIL 133S90 05/02/85 13.69 SUPER AMERI A FUEL OIL 133S90.05/92/ -85 36.30 SUPERAMERICA FUEL OIL 133S90 U5/02/95 45.19 SUPERAMERICA FUEL OIL a r 1985 CITY OF MAPLE WOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK N09 DATE ._AMOUNT VENDOR .. _ _ITEM OESCRIFTM 133S90 05/02/85 25090 SUPERAMERICA FUEL OIL 1 9 462.8 T 133T29 05/02/85 292859T4 T.A.SCHIFSKY SONS CONTRACT PYM 2,285.74 * 133T3j 05/02/85 99 TARGET SUPPLIES 99.99 * 133T42 05/02/85 1.61.A0 TELE•TCRMI'NALS CONTRACT PYM 133T42 05/02/85.577.53 TELE•TERMINALS CONTRACT PYM 133742 05/02/85 16500 TELEwTE.RMINALS CONTRACT FYM 133T42 05/02/$5 800if)TrLE•T= RM:NALS CONTRACT PYM 983.50 133T60 05/02/85 189.34 TOLL COMPANY SUPPLIES 189.34 133T80 0:5/02185 24.40 TRUCK UTILITIES MF6 VEH REPAIR 133T80 A5/02/85 125.97 TRUCK UTILITIES MFG VEH REPAIR 150.37 * 133TY3 05/02/85 47.50 TWIV CITY FILTER SUPPLIES 47.5fl * 133050 05/012/85 100010 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED SUPPLIES 133050 05/02/85 3005 UNIFORMS UNLnI TED UNIFORMS 133050 05/02/85 Y 29.65 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 133050 05/02/85 113.25 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNI FORMS 264.05 133U86 05f02/85 3.40 UNIVERSAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES 3.40 133W21 05/02/25 21942 WARNERS TRJE VALU SUPPLIES 133W21 05/02/85 15.41 WARN_RC TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 133 W21 05/02/85 32.1 3 WA Ry_ RS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 133W21 0.5/02/85 45.87 WARNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 133W21 05/02/t5 45.8?WARNERS TRUE VAIN!SUPPLIES I C7 17 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO.DATE __....__.._AMOUNT _ _ _Virm'NDOg _ . __ ___ .._ _ :_ITEM DESCRIPTION: 133U21 05/02/85 45.87•WARN "RS TRUE YALU SUPPLIES 114.83 133W64 05/02/85 18.12 V4TT:. BEAR DODGE SUPPLIES 8.12 ! 133W70 :.05/02/ °85 6000 VINFIELD MITCHELL CONTRACT, iFYM 60 * 00 ; 133X3D 05/02/85 139.20 XEROX DUPLICATING COST 1.53X3J 05/02/f5 139.19 _.. _ ._-XEROX DUPLICATING COS! 278.39 f 59 ,FU4D 01 TOTAL GENERAL 29103 *07 FUND 03 TOTAL HYDRANT CHARGE 14 ,959.51 FUND 13 TOTAL C.I.P. 189115.40 FUND 71 TOTAL 81m2) V B AYE /HV 3 OD FUM D 90 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER F 13.55 FUND 92 TOTAL PAYROLL BENEFIT 51160.39 FUND 96 TOTAL VEHICLE b EQUIP 1 D39220.T8 TOTAL I_TDIC.!ATES ITETZS - FINANCED BY RECRE."TTONAL FEES t j l 121 ,11) I T Y PROGRAM PR 10 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER 1 O CHECK y i 3 Oil1 DIVISION 21 NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAM E 12; GROSS r 3• 4 01 160 02-2018 01161 02 -5671 PAY BARRY -R 2260.23 15 3 011 o..} - 01-0109 1- GREAVL!JOHtI C 40. 00 d ; 5 01157 01-6134 WAS I LUK MICHAEL T = = 00 6 ;O1 18 01 - 8088 ANDERSON NORMAN G 325m00 7 59—131-9035-- f 511 MA RYL T -- ,,3 ,`r. f -- 1 O y i 3 Oil1 DIVISION 21 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1686w40 12; r 3• 4 01 160 02-2018 01161 02 -5671 EVANS BARRY -R 2260.23 15 BERM LOIS N 72'9. 60 16 a7 f DIVISION 02 CITY MANAGER 2583.83 X49 403 X2-7 3 MATH:EYS ALANA K DEL ORES 50. Id f 511 2T i 23+01 163 10 -6523 J r""I'l SWANSCIN, JR. I A T LIM V LYLE E 677. 60 i DIVISION 10 CITY HALL MAINT 774m 39 27 2s Sot 01 164 12- 0124 DOHERTY .ATHLEEN BeM67?.1 - 40 65- -- -4 2 --0}-6 - r c LAR Rif t3 --- - C4f --- 321 01166 1 Z UE RCHE R JOHN L 157. 6033! 341 DIVISION 12 EMERGENCY SERVICESVICES 1072. 80X35 1371 - 01 167 21 -1078 FAUST DANIEL. F 1686. 40 t 52 vvON - c3 54. 55 56 57 401 3 42 I DIVISION 21 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1686w40 r 45i 4 6 L. L. a7 01 165 22 -4432 01 170 2•c -4446 MOELLE R MARGARET A a 3A 316080 X49 403 X2-7 3 MATH:EYS ALANA K DEL ORES 784.80 50. f 511 52 vvON - c3 54. 55 56 57 I J _ 1Lj jw F-1 I L_ `L.' -T I L W I W %.i U I T Y u F M A P L E W PROGRAM PR10 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER RE CHECK GROSS NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME IPAY 3 01172 31-2198 AURELIUS LUCILLE E 1556m 00 i t 6 fft 054 1 A N 3-1---E--i-T-Y-C-L-E-RK----iADMI fil ST-R44T-IDN-7 8 9 Wt1101 01174 33-0547 KELSEY CONNIE L 304m50 121 8.00 01175 33-4435 VIETOR LORRAINE s 651,17 4ENSLEY----- 14'ollif 3%3-8389 GREEN PHYLLIS c 842a 89 281 15, 0 a? 1 Is DIVISION 333 DEPUTY REGISTRAR CAROLE L 2196m06 30 01181 4 1 -2934 SVENDSEN JOANNE M 784m80 31; 01 NEL SON --ROBE 1-528 1. s301141- 7E,36 OMATH JOY 01178 34-7528 STOTTLEMYER EDITH 01184 41-9"263 MART INSON 22 5 57 I"-L-1 24 DIVISION 34 ELECTIONS 8.00 27 281 1 1 0 a? 1 Is 01180 41-- 2 %23 56 RICHIE CAROLE L 631.20 30 01181 4 1 -2934 SVENDSEN JOANNE M 784m80 31; 0 NEL SON --ROBE 1-528 1. s30 1141- 7E,36 OMATH JOY E 6430 20 01184 41-9"263 MART INSON CAROL F 490e40 DIVISION 41 PUBLIC SAFETY ADM IN 5828,80 37 38 391 40 421-1 4 :21 - 0 1- 33da-ppq l-4-7 4 01186 42-0251 STILL VERNON T 1207. 26 01187 412-0457 SKALMAN DONALD w 12121 66 14,2 .43.MORE-L-Ll-RlqYM0ND---1207 226--- 44'01189 42-1204 STEFFEN SCOTT L 1117 46 A 1 01190 42-1364 ARNOLD DAVID L 1401w14 46 6 4 11- -19 1 42-1 8-&—LEE ROGER W 0i 47 I 01192 42-1577 BANICK JOHN 1 924, 06 01193 42-1660 BOHL JOHN c 754,46 150i49,Z-1 1-94 -42-1930---12-2 9 66 511 L 5 2! 5 3 54 5 57 I"-L-1 1i Lf I I T u r Irl H P - L I.- FmuutCHm PH10 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER 1 Z5 3.1-5-1-40-45— 01212 43-0009 KARIS0, i' FLINT D 1085, 320121343-0466k27 HEINZ STEPHENaO J 1223 2 a 5 2 3 0 12 1 5j 43-1789 -1 23 • 2%_52--- 01216 43-2201 GRAF DAVID M 1278a 12YOUNGRENJAMESG1322m59 31 ' 36012184%-.21-6071 VORWERK ROBERT7791 E 1414a 30121943 8 3 3' MELANDER JON A 1278, 12 341 1 51 137, t-:p5 i38 01221 45-187841 EMBERTSON JAMES M 130`. 430 41 DIVISION 45 FIRE PREVENTION 1302s40 45: 46 f 17 01222 46-018348 RABINE JANET L 2E7`. 49 501 51 521 3! 54: 561 I'Ll CHECK NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME GROSS PAY 2 J 01195 96 42-2052 THOMA LLA DAVID J 924w 0 3 01197 412-2115 ATCHISON 6 01198 42-2231 KORTUS JOHN DONALD H V 12680 813 7 01200 42-3333 PEL-T-1 E-ft----1,23u36 9 01201 42-3591 WILLIAMS LANG DUANE J 158. 06 101 2 -A:7j - 01203. L. 411T ca 0-1- 42-4916 RYAN-- RICHARD J 1268a 89 11 2'01204 42-6119 HERBERT DREGER MICHAEL J 1;268: 89 13* 01206 4-2-7418---__RICHARD C A 1440, 22 86 14 15:0 1 2.) 7 42-7686 42-7887 MEEHAN,, JR GREEN JA MES E 1207m26 16 1 NORMAN L 14010 14 3 42-8516 HALWEG U 11 01210 42-9204 STOCKTON KEVIN DERRELL R 1378w 74 BOWMAN---R T 1207w26 yO: 121: 1 Z5 3.1-5-1-40-45— 01212 43-0009 KARIS0, i' FLINT D 1085, 320121343-0466k27 HEINZ STEPHENaO J 1223 2 a 5 2 3 0 12 1 5j 43-1789 -1 23 • 2%_52--- 01216 43-2201 GRAF DAVID M 1278a 12YOUNGRENJAMESG1322m59 31 ' 36012184%-.21-6071 VORWERK ROBERT7791 E 1414a 30121943 8 3 3' MELANDER JON A 1278, 12 341 1 51 137, t-:p5 i38 01221 45-187841 EMBERTSON JAMES M 130`. 430 41 DIVISION 45 FIRE PREVENTION 1302s40 45: 46 f 17 01222 46-018348 RABINE JANET L 2E7`. 49 501 51 521 3! 54: 561 I'Ll PROGRAM PR10 CHECK NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAYROLL CHECK REG'ISTER RE GROSS PAY 34 1 3 01223 46-0322 STAHNKE JULIE A 672*80 DIVISION 52 01232 52-0547 MEYER ol 5 01225 46-5919 NELSON KAREN A 770*40 01226 46-7030 MARTIN SHAWN M 672m80 LUTZ DAVID P J . 127i 01231 51-6872 HAIDER KENNETH G -38. 40 11606 12 34 1 10 1 DIVISION 46 DISPATCHING SERV o |DIVISION 52 01232 52-0547 MEYER GERALD W 1175, 68 15!01229 51-0267 BARTA MARIE L 602.,32 LUTZ DAVID P J . 127i 01231 51-6872 HAIDER KENNETH G -38. 40 11606 12 34 1 o |DIVISION 52 01232 52-0547 MEYER GERALD W 1175, 68 26 LUTZ DAVID P 879n32 127i EDWARD A 11606 12 tip:237 52-4037 HELEY RONALD L 1105,60 10960 4I 01244 53-2522 PRIEBE WILLIAM 930,40 01240 441 i 32 GESSELE 52-6755 PRETTNER JOSEPH B 1309,23 53-6109 GEISSLER WALTER 01241 52-8314 CASS WILLIAM C 1351,63 34 1 1 DIVISION 53 ENGINEERING I o |DIVISION 52 STREET MAINTENANCE 11620. 33 41 1 1 01*2143 5%23-1688 PECK DENNIS L 1105,60 42' i 01244 53-2522 PRIEBE WILLIAM 930,40 441 01246 53-4671 GESSELE JAMES T 10648 00 1415 1 01247 53-6109 GEISSLER WALTER M 1084a 80 1 DIVISION 53 ENGINEERING I t... 1 1 i V i III n r 6.., c w P KUU KHM P R 10 I CHECK NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER .NAME PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER GROSS PAY 2 3 01 ; 4 — `8 54 775 LOFGREN JOHN R c ,077 s 60 4` 61 DIVISION 54 PUBLIC WORKS BLDG MAINT 677 6 9' 101 11'012-'50 58-1590 0 - 172 MULWEE GEORGE W 942 4001 _ i1 8 `0 01 - 25-2--58 NUTESON LAV RE N E S s 13 8 2 3 E 3 14i ri0125358 -258. T • REHE.Lf+. EDSON DAVID 104,..,. `B 151 `01 8 595,..E OWED GERALDD C 1008s00161 1 I* 17 : a DIVISION 58 SAN SEWER OPERATION 84a 74 i2, L w 111 w.. %.a 5 r 0 01` --97E0 V i' `MACDONALD JOHN E 1046. 40 DIVISION 59 VEH EQUIP MAINT 1.099. 2027! 2 low 1s .,o ; 01 25 61--x ' 89 ODEGA RD rROBERT D 15718 311 i 01 c: 81—' 19 9 3 NNER 7+. -so 2 f 33 01 ` —•:+SO G i G . 8 R UMMEL STAPLES BARBARARA PAUL A 15. c0 I NE y '-12.E 3 a 28 i34j DIVISION 81 COMM SERVICES ADM I N 3904,43 38! 391 t 47- #---4 --r trtn L I NDO RFF 42 '01 G3 EE -4097 YUKE R DENNISDENNIS WALTER P A 925 w S0 54,00 4!01265 62—%'5506 01 EGG 8 —7 c 1 S t ARUS A MARK A 98'9. 3G J'BURKE MYLES R 990.40 46 01 S8 -9784 HUNTER TONY jet 98,00 DIVISION Gc PARS MAINTENANCE 6309. 54 51' 52 c3. 54 57 f r-rxuurxHjTj pKlko PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER CHECK D I V I I ON 72 PLANNING NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME GROSS 1935,66 8 PAY 2. 012693 63-0035 STARK S-ET-TL-Es-- RICHARD E 4 3 01271 63-3346 BOEVER 6 01272 63-4246 WARD RAYMOND L l5x94 01283 74-0776 0 1274 63-8158 PADGETT ROY 375u20 Df3tj8L--As MARCIE p DIVISION11 63 RECREATION 1Z PROGRAMS 1722o37 01275 64-0508 GREW JANET M 808w80SOUTRro -TET0127764-4624 a 4e01HORSNELLJUDITHA353,20It's DIVISION 640 NATURE CENTER 21 1566u 40 22F --- 3; 01278 71-0551 OLSON4It lc;v GEOFFREY W 1552, 001*117127-9— Aet26; 27; db.f I-M%a R%.M281t.JT'UFwT VEL-029 301 31 01280 72-7178 EKSTRAND 01281 72-850512 .3 j JOHNSON 34 THOMAS G 1007, 66 RANDALL L 9281, 00 D I V I I ON 72 PLANNING 37 1935,66 8 42 4 3; -6 I-G4 11T U6 451 46' I 01283 74-0776 WENGER ROBERT J 1064. 00'4 T 050t 49 I DIVISION 74 HEALTH INSPECTIONS i e164. 0651 21 531 FUND ON FILE 12151w55154. T-- 6 L37 121521. 55'GRAND TOTALS DATE 04/30/85 f_r..Lj RAht t PAYROLL CHECK RESTqTPP Pron NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME 3. 4 01296 02-2018 EVANS BARRY R 6 01297 02-9671 BEHM LOIS N GROSS PAY 2260,23 729n6o bl C I T Y 0 F M A P L E W 0 osro -8s P4y t DIVISION 02 CITY MANAGER'98go 83 ic, 13:0 iF4 ._... ro t 14 !0 1 1199 10-6523 SWANSON, JR,LYLE E 730,01 16 ! I Qp;D I V*I S I ON 10 CITYLTY HALL MA 795.35 2-0: 121 01 12-0 124 DOHERTY KATHLEEN M 6P 91 1 f 3, i i A IVISD ON 12 EMERGENCY SERVICES 629a 12 125 27 28 2- 3 1 D rVIS 10 i'l 34' 1 1 p L_0 2- -"O8 4 HAGEN ARLINE J 1071, 63 0 13 i4.13 22-442 MOELLER MARGARET A 105r S0ksTlZ14' 8 0 1 1*.3 0 5 22-7550 VIGNALO DELORES A 770. 40 411ff DIVISION 2 -.ACCOUNTING 71232 . 4 3 42, 3 40. 44 s '0113"06 31-2198 AURELIUS LUCILLE E 1556400 1 - 3 1 -98 1 JEANNE 47I CI CLERK- AIDMINISTRATT 0W__L____._____1 959"n 6 8- 50' 51; 52 53 0 1 ,08 3 3 0 %5* 4 7 KELSEY COIN IE L 264,00 54 57 bl C I T Y 0 F M A P L E W 0 osro -8s P4y DATE 04./ 85 C I T Y O F M A P L E W Q PROGRAM P R 1 O PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REPO NUM0 EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY 141 s 01309 33 --4435 V I ETO R LO R RA I NE S 651. 17 6 0 1310 33- -4504 HENSLEY PATRICIA A 382,50 7 789-G RE E - -PW LL I S--C _____ Z42 8 9 - - 3 c 9 10; Y TUN Y -t.J DEP .. TSTHHH 2 14 sue.? 6_____ ci 1 1 01 312 41 --1717 COLLIN KENNETH V 17 20 8 01 41 --`356 R I CH I E CA ROLE L 631.20 161 3 4 - 17 .: 4 Yvi -jOA{Vt4E M 784., - 80 171 0 131 41-318 NELSON ROBERT D 1 X 16 41 --1636 OMATH JOY E 643. :0 MART 2 yi IS -- SAFE 1 i - RI) MIN 1'2 3: I f o l %-1 18 4 01,.JO ZAPPA JOSEPH A 1401,14 ti , a 27' 0 •.3.19 y _ .42 0251 STILL VERNON T 1 26 Oil2Qfi1 ..: 0 42 5 ti..? L.. i l 30 1 i 1 42 --0 9O0 MOREL L. I RAYMOND J 1 207. 26 2 —,c `4 STEFFEN SCOTT L 1076. 09 f3 !--A 1'40 D7 -VID-1. r+ 3 ZA 1 ._;, --4 1 388 LEE ROGER W 1:....52u O6 ! 33' 1 , 1=42--1577 DAN I CK JOHN J 924, 06 01327 42 CLAUSON DALE N 1229.66 0 13 128 42 E-2 0 cam.THOMALLA DAVID J 924.06 L. =: --4`z:: =r- inns ;max- -I HA t, D -- -t4-•-- -1 8 6. 4 4 _- C 438 E 0 42 --2- 15 ATCH I SON JOHN 1268,89 1 31 42 - -2231 KORTUS DONALD V 4898 rg sC J J 134 , ; 01 33 4 ~ ... a WILLIAMS DUANE J 1899, 42 01 34 42-- 91 LANG RICHARD J 1 2- 89 a J -`-_ -.w 71y 4 it "•' - --I- C1EL - - -__-t . - -- l 0 1336 42 --4916 HERBERT MICHAEL J 1x:68, 89 45 1;3 7 42 -61 19 DREGER RICHARD C 1505. 36 S - 13"S 4E= 7r EEfZt3ERuN OSE PTT A- -SS - ,6 - 01339 4E --7686 MEEHAN JR JAMES E 1207, 26 01'40 42 --7887 GREEN NORMAN L 1401. 14 r -lSRE G0RY ---2Sm 66 1 .50i 51 ! 521 9 EMBERTSON JAMES M 1302. 4 0 4 01342 42-8516 HALWEG KEVIN R 1378s 74 01343 42-9*2104 STOCKTON DERRELL T 1248, 13 1 6 BDWM-AN --- ___R I_LK 86- - 8! 31 01 ,354 45-1878 DIVISION 45 1341 C I T Y 0 F M A P L. E W 0 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER PAY FIRE PREVENTION 1302s40 0 1i ` J 46-0183 DIVISION 4E PULICE—SEWI-CES L 778. 07 BPIRTA -MAFZI E ol 1 7 01 1 58 46-1899 46-5919 CAHANES NELSON.- ANTHONY KAREN G A 12 1359 46— 7 0 -23 0 KARTIN SHAWN 2-s" - 8 0— 411 3 J`0 46-72-1 FLAUGHER JAYME L I784, 80 42 01 46-9873 MADELL 4'01345 43-000'740 KARIS FLINT D 1085, 3 2 5-17 5 2, 81 1 5:01 _ ..46 4 3:5 0 4 Fj 6HEINZ STEPHEN 1 1-3891 15 43-0018 r[CHUL M 01 3 t 8 J.j L i4 %—' 789 GRAF DAVID M,1 -78, 12 49 437 2 0 1 YOUNGREN JAMES G 1411. 76 368. 96 i 2,.765101uz %J 4 %3j — 6 0 7 1 VORWERK'ROBERT E 1641., 48 121 i 0 1 s 4 *63 — 7 7 9 1 MELANDER JON A 1278,12 7: 17-4S4 BECKER 17- At 125 4C T4 -CtN----4'3----PARAMED-,M-SE-RV ICES —1 37, 62 2- 6 2 31 01 ,354 45-1878 DIVISION 45 1341 C I T Y 0 F M A P L. E W 0 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER PAY FIRE PREVENTION 1302s40 0 1i ` J 46-0183 RABINE JANET L 778. 07 BPIRTA -MAFZI E ol1 7 01 1 58 46-1899 46-5919 CAHANES NELSON.- ANTHONY KAREN G A 140 14 7-70, 40 1359 46— 7 0 -23 0 KARTIN SHAWN 2-s" - 8 0— 411 3 J`0 46-72-1 FLAUGHER JAYME L I 784, 80 42 01 46-9873 MADELL RAYMOND M 672,80 44 i. 51 DIVISION 46 DISPATCHING SE RV 5-17 5 2, 81 A 7 BPIRTA -MAFZI E L- -SOO, 00 jJ01 0112363 51-1-3,174 WEGWERTH JUDITH A 618,40 01364 51-6872 HAIDER KENNETH G 1838. 40 i54 1 t T-- DIVISION 51 PUBLIC WORKS ADM IN 2856. 8O i L- t - y 6 437 DATE 04130185 PROGRAM PR 10 NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME REPO F-1 L-.j PROGRAM PR10 C%TY OF MAPLEWO PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REPO 0 2.NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY 013_365 522-0547 MEYER GERALD W 1002, 64 0'1366 52-1241 KANE MICHAEL R 972.00 013G 521484 REINERT EDWARD A 1008. 80 953. 60 3 14 171 DIVISION STREET MAINTENANCE 10%'5 3 0, 1. 5 PRIEBE WILLIAM 9230. 40 13 0 AHL RAY 3 IVISION 53 ENGINEERING 6591 63 LOFGREN JOHN R 6772 Qp I r=)*'10 N 54 PUBLIC WORKS' BLDG MAINT 6 0 01 2% 8 4 58-1720 NUTESON LAVERNE S 1 3*57. 98 45!01387 58-5993 OWEN GERALD c 10080 00 DIVISION SAN SEWER OPERATION 6270,72 51 i MULVANEY 0 3 L '!-757: 0 DATE 04/30/85 C % T Y t] F M A P L E W O onnnpn* PR10 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REPO 13ROSS MUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY w ` 01389 59-9760 MACDONALD JOHN E 1046. 40 a DIVISION 59 VEH & EQUIP MAINT 2099020 01390 61-0389 ODEGARD ROBERT D 1571 20 KRUMMEL BARBARA A 315.20 0113F93 61-2618 STAPLES PAULINE 1233n23 DIVISION COMM SERVICES ADMIN ZC 2 21 1355 2-7 01399 62-7219 BURP.,MYLES R 990s40 3 2-;DIVISION 62 PARK MAINTENANCE 6409s 73 01402 63-00 STARK RICHARD E i DIVISION 63 RECREATION PROGRAMS 1351.81 451 01405 64-0E%-*508 GREW JANET m 808,80 tr M in-L-1= 7t — In t el- "Mtn" mw r -rtZ'rTMF 011.407 64-46"24 HORSNELL JUDITH A 353.20 49 . DIVISION 64 NATURE CENTER 1566~4@ s^ | p 571 0 m DA-11-E 041/30/85 C%Ty OF MAPLEWO PROGRAM PR10 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REPO NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY 5 01408 71-0551 OLSON GEOFFREY W 1552 00 01409 71-8993 CHLEDECK JUDY m 800.06 DIVISION 71 COMM DEVELOPMENT ADMIN 2352w0o o. imYM ------ i -- 7 5 8 1411 72-8505 JOHN RANDALL L 928 00i r{ DIVISION 72 PLANNING 2006. 58 z`! 01412 73-0677 OSTROM MARJORIE 1281. 60 wq s 571 0 u/v151um 7,3 BUILDING INSPECTIONS 28.TqGER -R ER 1310 i3 19, 1181,40DIVI74HEALTHINSPECTIONS FUND NOT ON FILE wq s 571 0 DATE 04/30/85 PROGRAM PR10 C I T Y O E m A P L E W# PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER RE z ` NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY 4 lei S , 0 1416 12 -0166 CURE LARRY J 242040 01417 12-0908 Z UE RCHE R JOHN L 157,60 9 DI .1 EMERGENCY SERVI 4 10 I RD ROY 1 6= 0 - — + " - Et;f ate`I DW- P'ROG-RA _-- -- - -- _ —____ ?' 0 - 9 - - -- -- - - - -- - __ — - T - - -- Obi _. r - - F It 7 5 . `0 - I - t i 1 H N TAUS 175 L: 1 5 6• 27 i 3. 31 127 6 t42: 64, i t 6 1 , -7i I iS2 i 53 . i5J il57 E 00b TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: Budget Transfer DATE: April 24, 1985 MEMORANDUM Action by Council: Endorsed.._ Modif ReJ ected Dat The City's annual contract with Corporate Risk Managers, Inc. is based on an estimated five days of work at $475 per day. At the end of the contract period (April 9th) , a billing adjustment is rude for actual hours worked. Recently this adjustment was received and amounted to an additional charge of $1,840 for 31 hours of unanticipated time. This additional charge was incurred because preparationon of the s i f ' -p p pec ca lCi ons and analyses of the bids took longer than anticipated. Also, extra time was needed due to a complicated insurance claim-for the Beebe Road Water Pumpfng Station, The additional charge of $1,840 was not anticipated in the 1985 Budget. Therefore, it is requested that the Council approve a budget transferPpg of $1,840 from the Contingency Account in the General Fund to.cover the additional charge. DFF:1 nb April 18,1985 Actior, by Count Endorsed MEMORANDUM Modifi e 1ReJ ecte To City Manager Barry Evans Date From: Chief of Police Kenneth V. Collins. Subject: Background Investigation of Liquor License ApplicantL q pp1 i cant Gerry Lee. Walton,dba Red Lobster A background investigation of Gerry Lee Walton has b •been completed. No informa-tion has been located that would preclude his beinglicense.g eligible for a liquor KVC: js cc City Clerk Liquor F i l e 85- 003514 1 • r MAR 19x5 MAPLEWOOD POLICE 3 ,1y. 8 nnr of MnPtEn+000 So APP FOR INTO \ICATLNG OLIQ LICENSE 7MS APPUCATJOIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN Whoever Behan kno DUPLICATE. deemed tlt of ugly and wilfully falsify the answers to the following questionnaire ah 1rperjuryandshallbepunishedaccordingly, a 1 be In answering the following questions "APPLICANTS"shalt bporationoneofficershallexecutethisapplicationfore Governed as follows: For a Cor. bMhip one of the "App ~ CANTS" shall exec this officers, directors and stockholders. For a part-execute this application for all members of the partnership. EVERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED Ewa l t on as _ General Mana eT ' Individual owner, officer or 'partner ) for and in behalf of General Mills Restaurant Group Inc. r d al Rubs r p. Ae therebyapplforan _._.., Sale Intoxicating Liquorquor License M to be located at _ wt, i B rAveMaplewodtrilyS51 Give address and legal descri in the City of Maplewood, County of Ramsey State of Minneao96ofMaplewood, ta, in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No. 2. Cive applicant', date of birth: LC Gerr /Walton 23 7 55 l ( Day) (Month) (Year) , S. The residence for each of the appiica arced A herein for the past five years is as follows:Ue. c7-3 6 0 W 4 3 d r ?'1 New Brighton, MN 1 ears 2n. IL 1 year Calumett, IL 3 months B - ISMmington, MN. 2 years 3 dears 4. Ia the applicant a citl2en of the United States? Yes If naturalized State date and place of naturalizati N/ a corporation or partnership state citizenship includin naturalization of each officer or partner.N A 6. The person who executes this application &hall i 'agive or husband's !t 7-ft t full name and address.Kars Walton, T360 W. 143rd St. Ct., YMN 6 • What occupations have , applicant and associate sin this application followed for c the past five years?Restaurant Management - Red Lobster Inns 677 0 Lake Ellenor Dr., C e Orlando, FL - 11/2/7; esent C., 7. If partnership, state name and address of each partner N/A If a corporation, date of incorporatio 3/27/68 state in which fncorpora Florida , amount of authorised capitalization S S0 , 000 amount of paid in capi 23,,997 it a subsidiary of any other corporation, so sta t o Gene ra I M i I I s i nc . give Fileepurposeofcorporatio - -•- —-.. fume and address of all officers, directors and stockholders and the number of shares held by each: See Attached List of Officers 6 Dire tNaine) (Addrws) _._.._......._.City) If incorporated under the laws of another state, is corporation authorized to do business in this State? Y ---' Number of certificate of authority 21822 If this application is for a new Corporation, include a certified copy of Articles of Incorporation and By -Laws. S. On what floor is the establishment located, or to be located? Ground F1 oo_r 9. If operating under a zoning ordinance, how is the location of the building classified? B u s i n e s s , Commerical Is the building located within the prescribed area for such license? 10. Is the establishment located near an academy, college, university, church, grade or high school No _._.. State the approximate distance of the establishment from such school or church 11 State name and address of owner of building General Mills Restaurant Group, Inc. 6770 Like El lenor Dr. . 1 Orlando, n 32809 ; has owner of building any connection, directly or in- directly with appikant? Yes 12. Are the taxes on the abave property delinquent? No 13. State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, have ever had an • licatipp on for a Liquor License, rejected by any municipality or State authority; if so, rive date and details None 14. Has the arplicant, or any of his associates in this application, during the five years immediately prece0ing this application ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked for any violation of such laws or local ordinances; if so, give date and detail No d r 'r 27. If Off We license is being applied for, do you intend to deliver liquor by vehicle? If go, state number of motor vehicle permits issued by Liquor Control Commissioner for current year t 28. If you are building a new building for the purposes for which this application •is being made, please submit plans and specifications with this application. 29. FSnancing of the construction of this building will be as follows: Lion 30. Furnish a personal financial statement with this application . . If s partnership furnish financial state-ment of each partner. 32. Cive description of type of operation if this is an on-sale license application (i.e. whether cock- tail lounge., Hite club, restaurant, etc,, specifying Y y number of customers and any other pertinent data) Complete Seafood Restaurant with seating for 258 uest9 s 32. What previous experience have you had in the op o! the type of business described in the ans to No . 31 above Red Lobster has been in the business for 15 ac's 33. Applicant, and his associates in this application, will strictlofMinnesota S comply with all the laws of the Stategoverningthetaxationandthesaleofintoxicatingliquor; rules and re u1promulQAtedbytheLiquorControlCommissioner; .and all ordinances of h ' xtiors I hereby certify that I }gave read the fore oin t e municipality ; and are true of my own Knowledge, foregoing questions and that the a"were said questions Subscribed and sworn to before me this (suture of Applicant) v Gerry Walton -_ c{ay of THIS APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED WITH YOURU CHECK FOR THE FIRST LICENSE 1'I:RIOD. k k. i MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: City.Engineer SUBJECT: Tilsen's Maplewood Heights #13 DATE: May 7, 1985 Action by; Caw,ric ,. v Erdors e ci_._ ModifI r "^ The city council approved this plat specifically not requiringtheadditional10feetofrightofwayalongMcKnightRoadto conform with the county's major street plan. The county will not record the plat unless a street plan variance is granted by the county board. It is requesting that Maplewood provide a resolution detailing its position in the matter It is recommended the city council adopt the attached resolution. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, McKnight Road has recently been improved to a four -lane road adjacent to the proposed Tilsen's Maplewood Heights #13. WHEREAS, the additional right -of -way dedication would result in substandard lot sizes according to city code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL that Ramsey County is requested to grant a 10 foot variance from the major street plan along McKnight Road adjacent to Ti 1 sen' s Maplewood Heights #13. TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: MEMORANDUM City Manager Assistant City Engineer Ripley Avenue Water Main Public Hearing May 7, 1985 Action by, Council: Endorse I Modifi e Re J ecte Pat Notice has been given of a public hearing for the above —named project for 7 p.m. on May 13, 1985. Four financing options were presented to the city council as a part of the feasibility study, as follows: (The options have been revised from those presented in the feasibility study to better reflect actual assess— able costs.) Option 1 Total Estimated Project Cost $51,500 Services -- $900 /ea X 5 4,500 Water Main and Restoration Cost $47,000 Granada Addition Frontage 327 FF Remaining Frontage 685 FF Total Assessable Frontage 1 FF This option considers assessing the frontage equally for the entire cost of the project: 47,000 -t-1,012 FF = $46.44/FF Cost to Granada Addition $46.44 X 327 FF = $15,185 Option 2 This option considers assessing all frontage at $25.00 /FF and the city par— ticipating in the remaining deficit. Water Main and Restoration Cost $47,000 Assessable Cost - -1,012 FF X $25.00 /FF — 25 City Participation $21 Cost to Granada Addition $ 8,175 Option 3 This option considers assessing all frontage except the Granada Addition at 25.00 /FF and the Granada Addition being assessed the remaining costs. y , Water Main and Restoration Cost $47,000 Assessable Cost- -685 FF X $25.00 /FF — 17,125 Cost to Granada Addition $29,875 Cost to City a Option 4 This option considers assessing all frontage except the Granada Addition at 25.00 /FF and the Granada Addition for their proportionate share ($46.44/FF as in Option 1) with the city participating in the remaining deficit. Water Main and Restoration Cost $47.000 Assessable Frontage - -685 FF X $25.00 /FF — 17 Granada Addition - -327 FF X $46.44/FF — 15,185 Cost to City $14.690 It is recommended that the council adopt one of the four financing options and order the project by passing the attached resolution contingent upon the developer of the Granada Addition entering into a development agreement with a surety of 150% of his cost within 30 days of the council ordering the project. 2 RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, after due notice of public hearing on the construction of water main and restoration on Ripley Avenue, west of Edgerton street a hearing on said improvement in accordance with the notice duly given was duly held on May 13, 1985, and the council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That it is advisable, expedient, and necessary that the City of Maplewood cosntruct water main and restoration on Ripley Avenue, west of Edgerton Street as described in the notice of hearing thereon, and orders the same to be made. 2. The city engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement, 3. This project ordering is contingent upon the developer of the Granada Addition entering into a development agreement with a surety of 150% of his costs, as outlined in Option of the revision to the f e a s i b i l i t y study, within 30 days of the passage of this resolution. r IL Proposed Imp. 85 -4 Ripley Ave Watermain Public Hearing Mailing List Map o• N V 2 W in 136.18' -1 3 6.12.' to 0 2-Al I o P ' IW, in to WS 4 G P 1 _._ AAS •.... Z93 9 _ L'• 1. O ' 4.18 m 0 U in S too) 1' ' o Proposed Watermain & Bituminous Restorationon Overlay 24 a a ¢^ t . o 4, Ti 7uaot R • - D' f, ' N ti• !w r UT 1 `D L P1 ' z 3 ,CIO Co S 4 b 2 1 _ annow --. . — _ ITS j A 40 or r low 3 2b S s 20 12 - 7 e • 2 j s9. 3 • 13 l O April 1985 O April 19, 1985 Action by Coon Endorsed NEMORANDUM "`"'Modif Rejecte To: City Managerer Barr Eva Date9ys From: Chief of Police Kenneth V. Collins Subject: Liquor License Investigation of Jahn Alfred Roberts, dba9e J.R, s Maplewood Liquor All background checks for the above applicanticant have been completed. PP p ed. We havelocatednoinformationthatwouldpreventtheissuanceofaliquorlicense RoberttoJohnAlfredRober KVC:js cc City Clerk Liquor File 85- 003983 r ,c .i•.i'w •^ "4 g , .gam,' "•.a T a%,'E'wt ' a3i5ih'.: 7.'.. . ; .f 2r R.,f° .: >.. vy. .. _q w 'i . ..•u.r ,rte, r: r Ti7' , v, . i - r. ' w,. ... r le t T' "•y . ,?`Jl. '`: l'3 E •x H ."E: Y' .vro .a _. 1 I II f NOTICE OF HEARING ON INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that pursuant to action by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, a public hearing will be held on the 13th day of May, 1985 starting at 7:14 P.M. in the City Hall, 1380 Frost Avenue, to con- sider the application of the following individual for Intoxicating Liquor License: John Alfred Roberts such license to be located at J.R. ' s Maplewood Liquor, 1347 Frost Avenue. The Council is proceeding in this matter.as outlined under the provisions of City Ordinances.. Such persons as desire to be heard in reference to this matter will be heard at the times and place as indicated. Dated this 29th day of April, 1985. I - City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota Publish: Maplewood Review - May 8, 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD APPLICATION FOR MOXICATING ]LIQUOR LICENSE THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN DUPLICATE0 Whoever shall knowingly and wilfully falsify the answers to the following questionnaire shall be aeev=cd g of perjury and shall be punished accordingly. In answering the following questions "APPLICANTS" shall be governed as follows: For a Cor- poration one officer shall execute this application for all officers, directors and stockholders. Fora part - nership one of the "APPLICANTS" shall execute this application for all members of the partnership. ERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED 1LS 4/ /-AZ Id, Individual owner, officer or partner) ' for and in behalf Of :. hereby apply for an Sale Intoxicating Liquor License to be located at in the City of Give address and legal description) Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No. 95 of Maplewood. 2. Give applicants' date f birth: QW Day) (Month) (Year) 8. The residence for each of the applicants named herein for the past five years is as follows: 4. Is the applicant a citizen of the United States? If naturalized state date and place of naturaliz atio If a corporation or partnership, state citizenship including naturalization of each officer or partner. 6. The person who executp application shall give wife's or husband's full name and address____ 6. what necunstionx 14ve anplicsT and ogsociA +es in 04c mi!%"Umgtion followsO for fhe psis+ five years . 7 .tom T T`- -_ 7 . If partnership, state name and address of each partner If a corporation, date of incorporateo state in , - -t , which incorpora amount of authorized capitalization amount of paid in capi ff a subsidiary of any other corporation, so sta give purpose of corporation- name and a33rczs of all officers, directors and stockholders and the number of shares helded by each Name) (Addreu) - (Ci If incorporated under the laws of another state, is corporation authorized to do businesss in this State? . Number of certificate of authority If this application is for a new Corporation, include a certified copy of Articles of Incor andBy - Laws. 8. On what floor is the establishment located, or to be located? 9. If operating under a zoning ordinance, how is the location of the buildin classified?assified . Is the building located within the prescribed area for such license 10. Is the establishment located near an academy, college, university, c u •church, grade or high school? State the approximate distance of the establishment from such school or churc 11. State name and address of owner of boil 12. Are the takes on the above property delinquent? 18. State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, have ever h 'had an application for a Liquor License rejected by any municipality or State authority; if so, give date and detailstails 14. : " th. applic...it, o; Any of his associates in this apoj* k ativ,., "u' •the five m,years inedia"x preceding this application ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revok ed for any violation of such laws or local ordinances; if so, give date and detail hW owner of building any connection, directly or in- directly, with applicant? --' - ; lb. State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, 'were ever convicted of any I.i or I.aw Violations PP during that past five years ti ons or any crime in this state, or any other state, or under Federal Laws, and if no, give date and d etails 16. h applicant, or any of his associates in this application, a member of the overnin8 g body of the municipality in which this license is to be issued? If so in What , at capacity . 17. State whether any person other than applicants has any right, title or interest in the furniture,fixtures, or equipment in the premises for which license is applied, and if so give nameses and details 18. Have applicants any interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly, in any other liquor establishmentment in the State of Minnesota? l Give name and address of such establishmen 19. Furnish the names and addresses of, at en eseastthreebusinessrefer includingA) s •te one bank refer- enc e/ I r .f' 77 20. Do you possess a retail dealer's identification card issued b the Li uo •Y q r Control Commissioner which will expire December gist of this year? Give number of sam 21. Does applicant intend to sell intoxicating liquor to other than the consumer? 22. State whether applicant intends to possess, operate or rmit thePe possession or operation of, onthelicensedpremisesorinanyroamadjoiningthelicensedpremises, any slot machine dic , gam' bling device and apparatus, or permit any gambling therei > 23. Are the premises now occupied, or to be occupied, by the applicant entirely separate and exclusivePexlusve from any other business establishment? l•• - NZ r 24. State trade n ame to be 25. State Dam? of person that will operate store_.- - n 26. Give Federal Retail Liquor Dealer's Tax Stamp Number _,e r; ! 7` 40 `! 27. Tf miff sale license is being applied for, do you intend to deliver liquor by vehicle I VU if so state number of motor vehicle permits issued by Liquor Control Commissioner for current year 28. If you are building a new building for the purposes for which this application is being made, please submit plans and specifications with this application. 29. Iinancing of the construction of this building will be as follows: 80. Furnish a personal financial statement with this application. If a partnership, furnish financial state- ment of each partner. 81. Give description of type of operation if this is an on -sale license application (i.e. whether cock - UW lounge, nite club, restaurant, etc., specifying capacity by number of customers and any other pertinent data) 82. What previous experience have you had in the operation of the type of business described in the answer to No. 81 above •'Z , - - • . ' = 7t1 f' - - e - / 4. J Al J dft 83. Applicant, and his associates in this application, will strictly comply with all the laws of the State of Minnesota governing the taxation and the sale of intoxicating liquor; rules and regulations promulgated by the Liquor Control Commissioner; and all ordinances of the municipality; and I hereby certify that 1 have read the foregoing questions and that the answers to said questions are true of my own knowledge. L Subscribed and sworn to before me this (Signature of Applicant) day of )9. THIS APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED WITH YOUR CHECK FOR THE FIRST LICENSE PERIOD. Ankfn nilConfiden 0 Fiiuulciul Informa Assets Cash on hand and in Banks U. S. Id. overnment Securities Accounts Loans and Notes Receivable Cash Value Life Insurance Val u _&f _ Other Stocks and Bonds Real- Estate Automobi s-N umber Y Household Furnishi and Personal Effects Other Assts (itemize) TOTAL ASSETS Liabilities and Net Worth Notes P Liens on Real Estate Other Liabilities (itemize) (V TOTAL LIABILITIES 0 NET WORTH Soorce of Income Salary Dividends and Interest Bonus -and Commissions RealE Income Other Income Bank References: If dame, -4 Address 2.f-7/4 Business References: Name Address 1 .1..? 1 { i` !fi ; ~ (' '' + t . - , l yid 2. fit TOTAL INCOME 40, y 00, Phone Aa-yp Occupation Phone 7 The undersi certifies that this information was provided b si ana is true and correct. SIGNATUR /16 L2 NAME STREET l ' __ .`' ` --_- '--- ,.. -.% fry - - , f pq CITY STAT E IP 1) MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT /OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: City Manager Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner Setback Variances 1774 Cope Avenue Burt Nordstrand Maplewood Medical Clinic Addition April 29, 1985 Aoti on by Council: dors uodffie Rej ec t ec Date____ SUMMARY Request Approval of a fifteen foot parking lot setback variance and five foot building setback variance from the south lot line. Proposal 1. The applicant is proposing to construct a one- story, 62 by 45 foot addition (2,790 square feet) to the Maplewood Clinic. 20 The applicant is planning to construct the addition at, the same setback as the existing building. The code has changed since the original building was built, and a variance is now required for the addition. 3. A landscaped screen by the parking lot addition will be provided as required by code. 4. Refer to the letter on page 6. Recommendation Adoption of 'the resolution on page 8, approving a fifteen foot parking lot setback variance and a five foot building setback variance from the southerly property line for the Maplewood Clinic at 1774 Cope Avenue, based on the findings that: 1. There is an undue hardship created by the city adopting a more restrictive setback ordinance after the original building and parking lot had been built. Building at the current requirement would result in a conflict with the existing building. 2. -The spirit and intent of the code could be met since the site is already properly screened from the adjacent homes and additional plantings could be provided to buffer the parking lot addition. BACKGROUND Site Description 10 Lot size: 31,620 square feet. The westerly 5 feet is proposedYPP to be purchased from the Northeast Professional Center. 20 Existing land use: Maplewood Clinic medical center 3. Existing easements: There is a 30 foot utility easement for a water main, gas main and overhead electrical lines east of the existing building, Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Cope Avenue and Specialty Engineering Southerly: single dwelling Easterly: Mobil Service Station Westerly: Northeast Professional Center Past Action 6- 12 -79: The board conditionally approved plans for the existing building, Conditions have been met. 9 -2 -80: The board conditionally approved the landscape plan* Conditions have been met,, 4 -9 -85: The board conditionally approved plans for this addition. Two of the seventeen conditions required that: 10 . Enough Techny arborvitaes be planted along the southerly lot line to create a screen that is at least six f eet tall, measured from the parking lot grade, and 80 percent opaque to buffer the parking lot addition.. All grass areas shall be sodded. The landscape plan is otherwise approved as presented. 2. Construction shall not begin until the 30 foot utility easement is vacated by the c i t y council and the applicant enters into an agreement with the city to abandon the six -inch water main. The board also recommended approval of rear setback variances of fifteen feet and five feet for the parking lot and building addition by the city council. DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Planning r 1. Land Use Plan designation: LSC, limited service commercial center 2. Zoning: LBC, limited business commercial 2 e 3. Section 36 -154 (b) of the zoning code states that a building in anLBCdistrictshallhaveminimumsideandrearyardsetbacksoftwentyY a 4e Section 36 -27 (a .1.) requires that a landscaped area of not lessthantwenty _ feet in width P y th shall be provided where a nonresidential usewouldbewithintwohundredfeetofaresidentially -zoned ro ertPP y. 5 Section 36 -27 (c) provides that screening shall be satisfied bytheuseofascreeningfence, planting screen, berm or combinationthereof. If the topography, natural growth of vegetation, P ermanentbuildings, or other barriers meet the standards of subsections (a) C a and b) below, they may be substituted for all or part of the screeningfenceorplantingscreen: a. A planting screen shall consist of evergreen plantings.Trees shall be a minimum of two and one-half (2 1/2) inches in trunk diameter, two (2) feet above grade. Shrubs may be used in combination with a berm and shall be a minimum of two (2) f 'eet i nheight. Spacing of trees and shrubs shall be so as to create an eighty (80) percent opaque screening at least six (6) feet in height. b. Berms shall have mowable side slopes. Slopes greater than two and one -ha 1 f (2 1/2) to one may be used if the slopes are stepped with retaining walls. Plant materials resistant to erosion may be substituted for sod when approved by the commmunity design review board. 6. Statutory Requirements Section 367.11 subdivision 6 (2) . State law requires that the following findings be made before a variance can be granted: a. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. b. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. P 10 Recommendation by the review board 2. Public hearing by the city council jw Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /zoning Map 3. Applicant's letter dated 4. Site Plan dated 3 -12 -85 5. Resolution 3 -12 -85 3 J c _ D Q M f _ r N Lr 4 _ a , gx W AV A wK z Y MAP g RADA oc AY MARK M ^ , (? — — — :: POND _ Cr IL (...Cr -l y a i! 1 & (2 \ tzollM.OHL MAN d AV 2 W KOHLMAN AV S Vs D W o z Co >RD (23) ! ,. N h i z T29N,R22w Z c'3 2 Cr =Q EDGAV E HILL RD 10t t Q DE MONT U. m C Ao p g ts SRO AV N J bi 3 z ELEve k a AV Q 0 XTAN T AV AV a 0 Q GER'VAIS GER GERVAIS AV RA.N -WE* AV ar z CT Q m V'KING OR It Y C4STLE AV 3s l RR 'N knuc Heod L e S EaaE.N Alf M COPE ` C .C JoE AV COPE S IL G }l A ;A . ' N 'I 7 p : "e "LAURIE _ Q x z ' W a gr E. Q a SA - HURS. W 4 i W a z u W JN TI ti ST v Y CL;RD PE AV 2 Cr AV ST 0 SK'w Q RECRE.4T /ON 1R A MAN V .St A Qjy RNA R — IS A/1 AV L'N ROSEWOODaQ 1P1IN AL' s A A\F ROST v AV 28 29 a 9D P IX F s ME R AV S SUM kCR U)W Cr CL F fi C r Qy O N Q 4Q W 121 p 1 OP-E 2 }Y.Q CD 5 AV i i .d U W Ix . p WAKEFIELD Y J J K INZ AV1114 = 2 to H ;A AV o LA K61 - ¢ O N PRICE AVz Q 2 9 QLANTUltAil LOCATION MAP' 4 Attachment 1 i 1 T #ws tit CO D R i 4 L- t • I t- fit Z 113 4 All r •.. i._..rti . L • /Zip t ' 1' • t _ - /.gyp 1.+ — , 40 tv14) li IV ^ . I tie rev 1* io Spec a l ty rauss Engineering 1 'f'n or .. , . s ` . s a 9 'S a /0 e s i Iwo 155. AV B 021 • • - Y .. .s :. :ti.•: Pro a AI k JL a L LB v • 7• 3 1 1 -74 1 1 17 17 1 -7 4 v e. 1 r JI t rte. j. j... ,,,_ r t • ••• t t • qft s 3 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Attachment 2 5 0 Jf Ww i t i JI t rte. j. j... ,,,_ r t • ••• t t • qft s 3 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Attachment 2 5 0 Jf elliof architects 512 2nd, street • hudson, wi 54016 • . 715 - 386 - 8303 March 12, 1 I • _ Variance or Appeals Board pp cit of.Maplewood i 1902 Co. , Road :B Maplewood, MN .55109 --. j --' _.- .- _- •+..__ -__ .}•- .___+rte -. - -_. ' _ •_ -_ .. ._ __ --._. . -... __. ._ _ r•. -_ ...._.__..._. To the Board: s-. ___ _. ' _- _. +-. - -. -- .- __.. w._.__._ • r_ _• s _ -.- - -+ _ - __--- •___ -. _- ._ We are appealling the 20 f t . -rear requiredsetback the LBC 1A district. i+Je dRaoul like to match the in _ of theline rear of the exist- ing buildinclinic g, - which now stands 15 tf t . of the rear property_ line. The property is now restricted for _size f any additions the parking space requirement which in to r rn limits the arrangement and location of any additions' to where we have proposed it,, If you have' any qu_ estions, lease feel free me.r - P ao call Respectfully, 4 Thomas J. Dornack 1 _ ______ 6 At to c 3 BUILDING AREA: 8990 s. PARKING: COPE. AVENUE. 45 stalls: 1/ 200 s. f. ,.- --- oAIMCAJ LNoE1( I I /L" ) i Zsps, O' One Way One Way s S E CPWO P ICISTItIC7 PfZ''CJhlt° 21 stalls -21 stalls 9YU?k4e i451 No lop 5r" F. PAN N :. : / i e i'- o" ~ MAR`SI"1ft_4_ R. APH 1 Vr ' U rTl L tUWip:%E1 ( /L ") `VP 3/q" MAR 12-1985 7 A arhMnr+ A Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of 1985 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Burt Nordstrand applied for a variance for the following- described property: Lot 3, Block 1 Johnson Office Park. The East 55 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, Johnson Office Park, Ramsey County Minnesota This property is also known as 1774 Cope Avenue Maplewood; WHEREAS, Section 36 -27 (a.l.) and 36-154(b) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires a twenty foot rear yard setback; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a fifteen foot buildingsetbackandafivefootparkinglotsetback, requiring variances of five feet and fifteen feet; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on March 14, 1985. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Community Design Review Board on April 9, 1985. The board recommended to the city council that said variance be approved, 3. The Maplewood 1985 to consider this mailed pursuant to law. given an opportunity to council also considered and review board, City Council held a public hearing on variance, Notice thereof was published and All persons present at said hearing were be heard and present written statements. The reports and recommendations of the city staff NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. There is an undue hardship created by the city adopting a more restrictive setback ordinance after the original building and parking lot had been built. Building at the current requirement would result in a conflict with the existing building. 2e The spirit and intent of the code could be met since the site is already properly screened from the adjacent homes and 8 Attachment-5 I additional plantings could be provided to buffer the parking lot addition. Adopted this day of , 1985. Seconded by Ayes- - STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of 1985, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this variance. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1985. 1 City Clerk City of Maplewood I B. Maplewood Clinic -- Building Addition and Setback Variance 9 Tom Dornac k of Elliot Ancc i tects was present. Board Member Deans moved the board recommend to the city council approval of the variance for a 15 foot parking lot setback and a five -foot building setback variance from the southerly property l i n e for the Maplewood Clinic at 1774 Cope Avenue, based on the findings that: 1. If the 20 -foot setback was met, it would result in poor building and site design. 2. The spirit and intent of the code could be met 'since the site is already properly screened from the adjacent homes and additional plantings could be provided to buffer the parking lot additions. Board Member Juker seconded Ayes - -all Board Member Deans moved the board approve the plans date - stamped 3 -12 -85 for the Maplewood Clinic addition at 1774 Cope Avenue, subject to the following conditions and modifications: 1. Approval of rear setback variances of fifteen feet and five feet for the parking lot and building addition by the city council. 2. Approval of plans by the community design review board does not constitute approval of a building permit. 3. The site plan shall be revised as follows:,. " a. The parking lot, west of the building, shall be striped to provide 9 by 18 foot spaces up against the sidewalk and curb and 9 by 19 foot spaces within the center row of parking. b. A trash enclosure must be provided in a location accessible by a garbage truck and acceptable to the city. c. A retaining wall shall be constructed along the southerly edge of the parking lot addition. This wall shall match the wall in design and materials. d. The proposed westerly driveway shall be widened to 24 feet. 4. Any exterior building or roof -top equipment shall be decoratively screened and hidden from view. The screening material is subject to staff approval. 5. An erosion control plan, acceptable to the city engineer.shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit for erosion control during construction 6. Parking areas shall be striped and all bituminous areas shall have continuous concrete curbing. Parking lots shall be kept in a continual state of repair. 2 4 -9 -85 7. If construction has not begun within two years of approval, board review shall be repeated. 8. If any adjacent property is disturbed or property irons removed due to construction of the site, that property shall be restored and irons replaced by the applicant. 9. Grading, drainage and •uti 1 i ty plans shall be subject to the city engineer's approval, 10. Construction shall not begin until the 30 -foot utility easement is vacated by the city council and the applicant enters into an agreement with the city to abandon the six -inch water main. 11. Enough Techny arborvitaes shall be planted along the southerly lot l i n e to create a screen that is at least six feet. tall, measured from the parking lot grade, and 80 percent opaque to buffer the parking lot addition. All grass areas shall be sodded. The landscape plan is otherwise approved as presented. 12. All required landscape areas shall be continually and properl maintained. 13. All required plant materials that die shall be replaced by the owner. 14. The applicant Thal l provide to staff, in the amount of 150% ments that are not completed by 15. The applicant shall meet al and have the deed recorded with to obtaining a building permit. a monetary guarantee, in a form acceptable of the estimated cost of any s i t e improve- occupancy requirements of the lot split procedure Ramsey County for the west 55 feet prior 16. Signs shall be provided in the parking lot to direct one -way traffic flow. 17. The four American lindens at the west side of the s i t e shall be 2 1 inch in caliper as shown on the landscape plan submitted to the board on April 9, 1985 Board Member Rossbach seconded Board Member Rossbach moved an amendment to motion to add to condition 3 a. "Because of the intended use of the building" the parking lot west of the building . . . Board Member Juker seconded Ayes- -all. Voting on the motion as amended Ayes - -all. Secretary Ekstrand indicated that Richard Pearson of Rolling Hills Mobile Home park had requested the board consider his proposed fenci n. The board suggested that Mr. Pearson submit a site plan and construction plan for their review at the next board meeting. 3 4 -9 -85 e F ra i f MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT /OWNER: PROJECT . DATE: City Manager Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner Utility Easement Vacation 1774 Cope Avenue Burt Nord strand Maplewood Clinic Addition May 1, 1985 ou oil: End ors e bat SUMMARY Request Vacation of a 30 -foot wide utility easement. Proposal The applicant is proposing a building addition which would be placed within the easement. n .,..... _ - - This easement contains a water main and overhead power lines. 1. Water main - -the six -inch water main can be abandoned. It is not needed to provide water service to any property. The main should be discontinued by severing the l i n e and capping the good ends from use to prevent the possibility of a line break after the bu i 1 i dng addition is in place above it. 2. Overhead power lines- -there is an overhead power line on the west side of the easement that will have to be relocated at the applicant's expense, Recommendation Adoption of the resolution on page 7 to vacate the 30 -foot utility easement at 1774 Cope Avenue. Approval is based on' the finding that the vacation would be in the public interest. Prior to recording this resolution, the applicant shall: 10 Abandon the water main according to Maplewood and St. Paul Water Utility requirements. 2. Have the overhead power lines moved. BACKGROUND Site Description 1. Lot size: 31,620 square feet Existing land use: Maplewood Clinic medical center 3. Existing easements: the easterly 30 feet of the site is a utility easement containing a six -inch water main and a two -inch as main, There g T e e are also overhead power linesnes along the west edge of t h i s easement. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Cope Avenue and Specialty Engineering Southerly: single dwelling Easterly: Mobil Service Station and an adjacent 30 -foot wide utility easement Westerly: Northeast Professional Center Past Action 6- 12 -79: The board conditionally approved plans for the existing building. Conditions have been met. 9 -2 -80: The board conditionally approved the landscape plan. Conditions have been met, 4 -9 -85: The board conditionally approved plans for the applicant's proposed addition. One of the conditions required that construction shall not begin until the 30 -foot utility easement is vacated by the city council and the applicant enters into an agreement with the city to abandon the six -inch water main. DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Planning Section 412.851 of State Statutes allows a city to vacate any interest in property when the counci makes a finding that it appears to be in the public interest to do so." 2 M Ut- ntrAtra I 10 Planning commission recommendation 2. Public hearing and council decision jc Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Resolution 3 101 N r D 4 HQaor 4 It 1 p ; a N u C RAOATI h t ~ 1 0 u _ M _ MA M eft «-- •- • - ' Cr r &L or P AL 1! ONL YAN d AV J W KOHLMAN AV / Yo0 1 y Q a 'o Co > RD n23 M . 2 T29N,R22W C 3 g ¢ J j E OG E HILL RD 10111 2 0 0 Cr OE MONT AV m 0g N a ` ELE f c AV XTAN T AV AV o a GERVAlS GER%A! GERMS AV Q GRANDVIEW AV Z CT QW [w m VIKING DR " J TLE AV OEM 36 R R N AV COPE C COPE AV Knuckle Heod L 6 COPE S'y EN AV ' 1 L4RK ;>tV AR - V 4 N N H 1 N s ' RD t 0UR IE ` w Y W¢ a LAN O RD = 4 _ i = u o S NO HURST ¢ Z A = 0 JUNCT I JN ST Z o Y Gv > RD " a . 2 5 :t p RTE Ay a BURKE AV ~ N ` N`o`r 1 r m ELt1ktDG AV S ; SZ' F - V A ti ` h BF L '' W A W aY SKI 1` OEM R AV ISkILLOAANI AV CH KRIS AV v QQ ° N ROSEWOOD aYeN v' S AV RY- N A •P i A H V) JAVtROSTav 28 2 9 Q = - - - m Cr < QTONAti t; SUK * i, NE R AV R H W s TRISS!E AV = Y ¢ac AIPLE y z 4 y $ Q Q W 121 ev - a o m R IPL EY PZ A y U Q W Z 1- 9 w = _ = 2 S pyWAKEFIELD WFELDY •r J KINGSTON AV 0449JQ HA AV o \ .4KE `_ '' AP ze t b ` ¢ = 2 a PRICE AV p F J PRICE ` GV LMV = m Im LOCATION MAP f Attachment one Q N I r • 7 t `S a2Z w .. • to ft 4j dL d- No 5 cialt s :. S r u s Engineerin took i zf. `. _ t A.:• it1.s a 9i ctS a eS, aim E--.dll2j=MAlR' WHO W NEt Pro. a sow P. fit y L.. '•-t • f - •I • • • I 1-7 7Z72Q )3- VF LARK AVEUE Is, • W op i 11i r •• - ' t t PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 5 Attachment two I J 1 f ING AREA$ 8990 I. + 130 -foot uti INC3: ^ VENUE easement for all &: 1/ 200 sell .• oMeX40#4 LrOEr4I C Ivey 5CIfuNt water main, gasIS /r1 t r. I/" . _"'' , S (3'• ,main and over— a head electric l i n e s 1 • GPM One Wa2j r One Way 3 stalls r •` f 1 .• 1 Am1 ou VV %* F#'V"Nb !• VQ 8118 - s.21 stalls 21 stalls 621 00 t. i 2790 it.. jr 10 Op Z AONI lv. ") u TI "Ar vW=N ( 11 /x ) -# 5jC--A C MAR 1. 1985 SITE PLAN a Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the 13th day of May, 1985 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Burt Nord strand initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following described property: The 30 -foot wide utility easement lying within the east 30 feet of Lot three, Block one, Johnson's office Park. WHEREAS, the following adjacent properties are affected: Lot three, Block one, Johnson's Office Park WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. A majority of the owners of property abutting said utility easement have signed a petition for this vacation; 2. This vacation was reviewed by the planning commission on May 6, 1985. The planning commission recommended to the city council that this vacation be 3. The city council held a public hearing on May 13, 1985 to consider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law, All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. - WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above - described utility easement, public interest in the property will accrue to the following described abutting properties: Lot three, Block one, Johnson's Office Park NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood City Council that it is in the public interest to grant the above - described vacation. Adopted this 13th day of May, 1985 Seconded by Ayes-- 7 Attachment four STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SSW CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I. the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the 13th day of May, 1985, with the original on file in my office and the same is a full,, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to vacat of this water utility easement. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 19850 City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 1'0' TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT /OWNER: PROJECT: DATE MEMORANDUM City Manager Associate Planner, Johnson Planned Unit Development and Variance 2696 Hazelwood Street Health Resources, Inc. Hazel Ridge Apartments April 30, 1985 SUMMARY Request Parking Space Aotion by Council: Endorse ..,...._._,_ Modifie Rejecte Date Reauthorize a conditional use permit for 21 planned unit development, which includes community service uses, offices, the proposed Hazel Ridge Apartment project and a variance for the apartments to allow 75 less parking spaces than required by code. Proposal 1. Refer to the applicant's letter on page 13. The original PUD approval expired because the applicant could not start construction within the eighteen month permit deadline. 2. The seniors' residence is proposed to be a three - story structure, with 75 units (48 one- bedroom and 27 two- bedroom units) , the same as previously approved. 3. No changes are proposed for the site plan approved on 4-11-83, as amended 8 -8 -83 (see page 10) . rnmmPnts The seniors' project is consistent with land use housing policies. The parking space variance continues to be justified, given: 1) the parking standards are designed for family housing; 2) two other seniors' residences have been granted parking variances (see past actions) , and 3) if a problem should arise, there is enough room on site to provide additional spaces. Except for the change from owner - occupied units to rental units, the proposal is the same as previously approved by council. This change is due to the poor marketing response received for the owner - occupied concept (see housing section) . Last January, council agreed with this change, when it gave conditional preliminary approval for tax - exempt mortgage revenue financing (see past actions) . Condition four of the 4 -11 -83 approval has not been included in the staff recommendation. There is no public safety reason to restrict the turning movements to and from this site to right turns. A requirement to grant a trail easement is the only other change proposed in the conditions from the previous PUD . a Approval of the enclosed resolution (page 15) , approving a planned unit development at 2696 Hazelwood Avenue consisting of the Hazel Ridge seniors' residence, offices and community services programs for day. care, health and wellness and community health education. Approval is for one year, subject to: 1. Construction of the seniors' residence must be substantially started within one year, unless extended by council. (ordinance requirement) . 2. If council determines there is inadequate on -site parking for the seniors' residence within on year of 95% occupancy, additional parkin spaces may be required (4-11-83 PUD condition) 3. Development of parcel A shall require an amendment to the PUD. The director of community services shall be notified of any proposed development of this parcel prior to scheduling use of the softball /tee -ball facilities for an upcoming season. If the redevelopment of parcel A is to include recreational uses, the Maplewood Community Services director shall be involved in the development process, to represent the city's and the neighborhood's interests and to negotiate on their behalf. The director of community services shall approve the location of the proposed foot trails (8 -8- 83 PUD renewal condition) . . 4. A trail easement shall be granted and a trail constructed along the south property line, prior to issuance of an occupancy permit for the residence, unless waived by the director of community services. A developer's agreement for on -site improvements shall specify the construction requirements for the trail. Fencing is at the discretion of the applicant, 5. Density shall be calculated. on the basis of the entire residential portion of the site (proposed parcels A and C) and include, but not be limited to, a credit for underground parking and a reduction in net density for the trail easement required in condition, four, 6. The site plan on page 10 is adopted as part of the conditional use permit, except that the trail shown in the northeast corner of the site is not required. 2 BACKGROUND Site Description 10 Acreage: 10.6 Parcel A: 3.0 (Hazel Ridge Apartment) Parcel B: 4.23 (HRI offices) Parcel C: 3.38 (future development) 20 Existing Use (attachment two) a. Parcels "A and "C ": two ball fields, leased by the city for organized softball and tee-ball, This lease permits the "use of the ball diamond, providing said use does not conflict with the use of the property by the applicant." b. Parcel B: existing building, presently being used for the applicant's offices and community service programs for community health education, health and wellness and day care. Surrounding Land Uses North and East: Hazelwood Park South: a single dwelling on a 4.4 acre parcel, planned for residential lower density use. West: Hazelwood Avenue. West of Hazelwood Avenue, several single dwellings on large lots. Past Actions 1. This site: 8 -7 -80: Council approved a conditional use permit (CUP) to allow the appl iant to` operate community services programs for one year. All the conditions of this permit were complied with. 8 -6 -81: Council renewed the 8 -7 -80 CUP for one year and approved a parking lot expansion. 8- 23 -82: Council renewed the CUP for one year, 4- 11 -83: Council conditionally approved the Hazel Ridge planned unit development, consisting of HRI's offices, community services programs and a 75 -unit seniors' cooperative residence. Variances for floor area and 75 fewer parking spaces than required by code were granted. (The floor area variances are no longer necessary because of a code amendment) . The conditions of approval were: 3 1. That the previously permitted community services programs may be continued provided council determines that the use had no adverse affect on the neighborhood, 2. If council determines there is inadequate on site parking for the cooperative residence within one year of 95% occupancy, additional parking spaces may be required. 3. Development of parcel A shall require an amendment to the planned unit development. The director of community services shall be notified of any proposed development of this parcel prior to scheduling use of the softball /tee -ball facilities for an upcoming season. In addition, the director of community services shall be included in the planning process for the development of parcel A as a recreational facility. The director of community services shall approve the location of the foot trails and of the proposed use of parcel A as a recreational facility. 4e Right turn lane only when exiting the site. 8 -8 -83: Council approved an amendment to the PUD to: 1) eliminate a tunnel that had been proposed between the seniors residence and the HRA office facility, and 2) to clarify condition three of the 8-23-82 approval , to read as follows: Development Jof parcel A shall require an amendment to the planned development. The director of community services shall be notified of any proposed development of this parcel prior to scheduling use of the softball /tee -ball facilities for an upcoming season. If the redevelopment of parcel A is to include recreational uses, the Maplewood Community Services director shall be involved in the development process, to represent the city's and the neighborhood's interests and to negotiate on their behalf. The director of community services shall approve the location of the proposed foot trails. 4 -9 -84: Council renewed the CUP for two years, subject to: 1. Conditions of the permit approved on 4- 11 -83, as amended on 8 -8 -83. 2. Construction of the Hazel Ridge residence beginning within six months. (Code does not. permit more than a one -time, six -month extension. Since construction did not start within the required six months, the permit expired for the seniors' residence. ) 8 -9 -84: The community design review board approved the site, building and. landscaping plans dated 7 -25 -83 for the Hazel Ridge seniors' development. 4 1- 14 -85: Council granted conditional preliminary appoval for tax - exempt financing to construct the Hazel Ridge seniors' residence. This financing restricts the development to rental units. A positive market study must be submitted before final approval will be granted. 2. Other Seniors Residences: Early 1970's: council approved the 86 -unit Archer Heights seniors' development. Council allowed variances to reduce the parking from the code requirement of 138 spaces to 21 spaces. Counci 1 also eliminated the garage requirement. A survey of Archer Heights residents was conducted in May 1976 by Maplewood HRA. The HRA concluded that: The types of garage and parking variances given for this project should not be allowed again. While housing for the elderly might not need one garage and one parking place for each unit, they should include some garages and adequate parking spaces within a reasonable distance of the building. Adequate parking is defined as ample, not only for the needs of the tenants, but also for visitors." 1 -3 -80: Council conditionally approved a variance for the Concordia Arms " senior citizen residence to eliminate the requirement for garages and to reduce the required number of stalls from 250 to 103. Planning 14D Land Use Plan designation: RB residential business 20 Permitted density: 34 persons /net acre 3. Proposed density: 28.4 (parcel C only) 4. Policy criterial from the plan: a. Page 18 -8: housing should be provided which meets the physical and psychological needs of all persons. b. Page 18 -9: locate multiple family housing in areas not inferior to those generally used for conventional single - family housing. c. Page C -37: 1) An elderly housing project should be located in a residential district, but with good access to commercial facilities and services, such as grocery stores, drug stores, medical clinics and passive recreational areas. 2) Access to community services which are not in close proximity to the site should be provided by an adequate public or private transportation system. 3 The housing facility should be located so that quick response of emergency services (i`.e. medical, ambulance, police, and fire) can be provided, especially when these are not provided on site. 4) Whenever possible, open spaces for gardens . or recreation should be programmed into an elderly housing project. d. Page 18 -28 defines net acreage as gross acreage, less the acreage designated for public rights-of-way for streets or walkways. 5. Zoning: F, farm residence 6o Compliance with land use laws: a. Section 36-438(a) defines a planned unit development (PUD) as having two or more principal uses or structures on a single parcel of land of at least five acres. The applicant's proposal would have a seniors' residence and the existing HRI office building on 7.5 acres of land with an additional three acres, designated for future development. b. Section 36-438(b) states that the intention of a planned unit development is to provide a means to allow flexibility by substantial variances from the provisions of this chapter, including uses, setbacks, height and other regulations. Variances may be granted for planned unit developments provided that: 1) Certain regulations contained in this chapter do not realistically apply to the proposed development because of the unique nature of the proposed development; 2) They would be consistent with the purposes of this chapter; 3) The planned unit development would produce a development of equal or superior quality to that which would result from strict adherence to the provisions of this chapter; 4) The variances would not constitute a threat of a substantive nature to the property values, safety, health or general welfare of the owners or occupants of adjacent or nearby land, nor be detrimental to the health, safety, morals or general welfare of the people; and 5) The variances are required for reasonable and practicable physical development, and are not= required solely on the basis of financial considerations. D c. Section 36 -109 (1) requires two parking spaces for each multiple- dwelling unit, half of which shall be enclosed in a garage, carport or similar structure, Seventy -five spaces are proposed, one for each unit, 55 of which would be underground. A variance of 75 spaces is necessary, twenty of which are for garage spaces (see past actions - -other seniors' residences), d. Section 36-442 requires ten findings to approve a conditional use permit, Refer to the resolution on page 15. 70 Housing: a. In a market study conducted by Solomonson Associates for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) in August, 1982, this site was determined to be a good location for senior housing. The market study had been undertaken as part of the HRA' s proposed first -time home buyer /senior citizen housing program. b. A preliminary tabulation of responses to the Older Adult Home -Share Task Force's January questionnaire survey, supports the applicant's contention that older adults prefer seniors' residences to be rental rather than owner - occupied, Public Works 1. Sewer and water lines have adequate capacity for the proposed structure. 2. County Road C and Hazelwood are designated as minor arterial roadways. Hazelwood Avenue is projected to carry 1,100 vehicle trips at peak service. The proposed facility is projected to contribute 30 vehicle trips during peak service or 2.7 percent of the traffic loading. Parks and Recreation The city's bicycle route/trail plan (page 11) shows a potential off- street bicycle route from County Road C to Beam Avenue, through North Hazelwood Park and around the drainage pond. The trail would provide a recreational loop around the pond to the park. The parks director feels that the existing east -west trail in the park should be extended along the south line of HRI's south lot line to Hazelwood Avenue, rather than around the south side of the pond. A trail around the pond would be expensive to build because of steep slopes and may be subject to flooding. The parks director recommends that the .portion of the trail on HRI's property be built by them in addition to paying the .park availability charge, since this has been past city policy. Procedure 1. Planning commission recommendation 2. City council recommendation following a public hearing Attachments 1. Location Map 5. Building Elevation 2. Property Line Mcan 6. Letter of Request 3. Site Plan 7. Resolution 4. Trails Plan 7 it 3 s Beam Avenue Q - tr o - w • 1e C Rsr a 03 R . N . aRr •R Rl •t- 4 f - R • PUD ulu • F tnoE64LA. R R Lac sC F o - « R R - LB -- t • Ln M1 "h a R, 3 A LAC A I Highway 36 otMI i it _• C Y l.J It LEL AND R Z) am M R o R3 ONE IF R - 7 - 4 ili - s F ..... st 40 SKE LOC R vC u f s Awe rsc r73 a R ; La. A R F . LOCATION MAP Attachment One 8 1 L L L O L f• JC v ... ALF ft 1 13121 i : - .: mow • •.1 y r Parcel C r s 3.38 A) • d - Proposed site of i Hazel Ridge seniors' Residence s ' Wit:• L • • + .. Parcel A 3-0 A) - W f North Hazelwood: r Park Parcel B 1 . - 4.23 A) - - = • G •; 5L7 .• 3 Lam:. tom _• '' 77 5 2666 . c G; %o -1559 _ -. 1585 i Ls••* I15.r' - X14' - 'd "+c• - t -CO I R x I =7 0- r PROPERTY LINE MAP 9 attachment two 4 N V - A . IN Wd too Ad 'amp O O . i vas r a I r t» HAZEL •R IDGE k PUD . = ' SITE PLAN J - 10 Attachment three - Director of Community Development City of Maplewood April 12, 1985 Page -2- application. Since the beginning of 1984, our constituency list has grown to over 900 individuals, indicating the wide and deep interest in this project. We anticipate an early summer construction start and. look forward, as does Maplewood, to pro- viding the type of senior housing of which we can all be proud. If you have any questions, please call me at 770 -9133. Sin erely yours, ohn Hurley Director, Outreach Senior Services HEALTH RESOURCES os encs cc: Jay Johnson, MHWB Architects Brian Murphy, Tri -State Service Corporation 14 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of 1985 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, a conditional use permit for the Hazel Ridge Planned Unit Development, including a parking space variance for the 75 -unit seniors' residence, has been initiated by Health Resources, Inc. for the following-described property: The North 800 feet of the South 1310 feet of the West 578 feet of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 3, Township. 29, .Range 22. Such above property being also known and numbered as 2696 Hazelwood Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota: or WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit and variance request is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was initiated buy Health Resources, Inc, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ord i napces . 2. This conditional use permit and parking space variance request was received by the Maplewood Planning Commission on May 6, 1985. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on , 1985. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports land recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. WHEREAS, the parking space variance requested in conjunction with this planned unit development consists of a total of 75 spaces, twenty of which would be covered spaces. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described conditional use permit and parking space variance be granted for a planned unit development at 2696 Hazelwood Avenue consisting of the Hazel Ridge seniors' residence, offices and community services programs for day care, health and wellness and community health education. Approval is for one year, subject-to 1. Construction of the seniors' residence must be substantially started within one year, unless extended by council (ordinance requirement)* 2. If council determines there is inadequate on site parking for the seniors' residence within on year of 95% occupancy, additional parking spaces may be required (4-11-83 PUD condition) . Attachment 7 15 3. Development of parcel A shall require an amendment to the PUD. The director of community services shall be notified of any proposed development of this parcel prior to scheduling use of the softball /tee- ball facilities for an upcoming season. If the redevelopment of parcel A is to include recreational uses, the Maplewood Community Services d.i rector shall be involved in the development process, to represent the city's and the neighborhood's interests and to negotiate on their behalf. The director of community services shall approve the location of the proposed foot trails (8 -8 -83 PUD renewal condition), 4* A trail easement shall be granted and a trail constructed along the south property line, prior to issuance of an occupancy permit for the residence, unless waived by the director of community services. A developer's agreement for on -site improvements shall specify the construction requirements for the trail. Fencing is at the discretion of the applicant. 5. Density shall be calculated on the basis of the entire residential portion of the site (proposed parcels A and C) and include, but not be limited to, a credit for underground parking and a reduction in net density for the trail easement required in condition four. 6. The site plan on page 10 is adopted as part of the conditional use permit, except that the trail shown in the northeast corner of the site is not required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described conditional use permit and variance request be approved on the basis of the following findings -of -fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan "and with the purpose and standards of the zoning ordinance, 2e The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed,, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 59 The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties, 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 16 80 The use would not create excessive additional requirements at publicis cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 9.The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. pApprovaloftheparkingspace variance is recommended on the basis that: The zoning code does not consider the unique nature of parking space and floor area requirements for senior housing, as such strict enfo. rcement of the code would constitute an undue hardship. 2. The variances are required for the reasonable and practical proposeddevelopmentroofthe seniors' residence and are not based solely on financial concerns. 3. The parking variance is less than that approved for Concordia Arms (50$ versus 59%)* No parking problem has occurred at Concordia Arms. 4. IIf a problem were to occur, adequate room exists on the site to provide additional on -site parking. 5. The variances will not constitute a threat of a substantive nature to the inhabitants or adjacent property owners. Seconded by Counci lmember Ayes- - STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I. the undersigned, 9being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of PtheCityofMaplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a of the city of Maplewood, held on the day of regular meeting y and the same is a full , 1985, with the original on file in my office, true and completeete transcr i P t therefrom insofar as the same relates to this Planned Unit Development for Health Resources, Inc. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1985. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 17 M TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATIONS APPLICANT: OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: MEMORANDUM f City Manager A.on by Council .' Associate Planner -- Johnson #. indorsed._. Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat Nodif i edMailandandDorlandRoads Rejected.,._..Good Value Homes, Inc. - Jim Bern Company Date Maplewood.Hills Preliminary Plat May 1, 1985 SUMMARY Request 10 Approval of a conditional use permit for a planned unit development of quad - style town houses. 2. Approval of a preliminary plat. Proposal 1. Refer to the preliminary plat attachment. 2. Eleven, four -unit, quad -style town houses would be constructed, each with a tuck - under double garage. 3. Each unit would have its own lot, for individual ownership. 4 . The bedroom mix would consist of 39 two - bedroom and five one - bedroom units. All units will have 1024 square feet of habitable area on the upper level of the bi -level structure. The proposal is consistent with all zoning and platting requirements. Recommendation 10 Approve the enclosed resolution (page 8 , to approve a conditional use permit for the Maplewood Hills planned unit development, subject to: a. Compliance with the site plan dated April 15, 1985, unless the community design review board authorizes a change. b. Construction must be substantially started within one year unless an extension is granted by council. Further reviews are waived. 2. Approval of the Maplewood Hills preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions being satisfied before final plat approval is applied for: a. Council approval of the planned unit development by the same name, b. Entering into a developer's agreement, with the required surety, for the construction of on -site storm sewer facilities. c, .. The developer's agreement shall require the corners of each lot to be identified by land survey monuments. A registered land surveyor shall certify that the location of the footings for the common walls are as proposed on the site plan, before they are poured. d. Submittal of the homeowners' association bylaws and rules for approval by the director of community development. This document (s) shall adequately address the private maintenance responsibilities for the driveways, parking areas and on -site private utilities. e. The city engineer must approve the final grading, drainage and utility plans. 2 BACKGROUND Site Description 118 Acreage: 5.72 acres 20 Existing land use: undeveloped Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Pond Avenue and McKnight Townhomes Southerly: Mailand Road and single dwellings Easterly: Dorland Road and McKnight Townhomes Westerly: Maplewood Gardens Apartments and a Maplewood water pumping station. Past Actions 4- 23 -85: The community design review board conditionally approved the site, building and landscaping plans for this proposal. The conditions included requirements for council approval of a PUD or rezoning and revision of the landscape plan to provide a six -foot tall, 80% opaque screen along the south property line, subject to staff approval. Code requires this screening when a multiple development abuts or fonts property zoned for single dwelling use.) Planning 1. Land use plan designation: RM, residential medium density 2. Density: permitted - -22 persons per net acre; proposed -.21.8 persons per net acre. This includes a permitted density bonus for the tuck -under parking. 3. Zoning: present - -F, farm residence; proposed -- planned unit development 4. Section 36 -438 requires ten findings for approval of a conditional use permit. Section 36-437 ( 9 ) requires approval of a conditional use permit to authorized a planned unit development. Refer to the resolution on page 8 for these findings, Environmental There are no significant natural features on the site. Public Works The proposed storm sewer improvements w i l l be the only ut i 1 i t i es maintained by the city. 3 Citizen Comments Two single dwelling owners on the south side of Mailand Road are concerned that there will be excessive headlight glare onto their dwellings, as cars exit the site onto Mailand Road. Headlight glare is not likely to be a problem because: 10 The quad site will be above street grade, so the headlights will be directed into the street or 'slightly into the property to the south until the cars are on Mailand Road and turning. 2. The single dwellings are setback from Mailand Road between 100 and 150 feet. 3. The front yards of these properties are wooded. jC Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map - 3. Resolution 4. Preliminary plat and site plan dated 4 -15 -85 4 W L. Z t 35 UPPER AiTON R0.L J6 16l T2gN R2;!w f • 2 r4l t LOWER AFTON R0. 100 %DIN LA. _ W Na . ° t2 (1) MAF .. 39 (2) 0 Do N ( 3) PO' 4) 0'ID g Q (4) a WA «AND R0. ; 25 3 3 :: CL EAK ok. 1 WIX D cn } L. OL^ DG DR Cr rl)LLWOOD DR. F" ~ Z Z O S > > O 4 4NO DR. Q Q O 2 Cr 23 L t NWOOD Av HL 72 DAHL Z CT T2 W 4, i 17R22W R21W 131e Q = r YL Q 3 72 74N1HW 494 74 b 25 AIDE AvE. h EWTZ LAV= LA ' 25 l SOUTHC S DPL 72 •'! . LOCATION MAP 5 Attachment one Q i APART tj , Pk c t IN L.101 41 Q ;A ^3 ` 3" SS''t . 5 aa.c T. c' r McKnight Townhomes ' Co _ } ry O 74L owl Maplewood L' ,I f S ..: .. •. •..:' • • tel: \ . rGarden 'x:::::. 9 :;s+': tier : : r•.1 • : • %ti: ; {ti : '1:1•.• rt.•: 'ti :' %..• :.. a : .. S : •:•.;•; :tip i :. ' •• :' :: '' J McKnight Townhomes 2 IA CRe, Ts :''r': .; :• tiff :: }•:::•:•::::•::::. :::. ; :; '•:::: •:•:• 1 r':::'• "•'•'= Location of driveway PUD r: 1 : ::::..:... : : a and RoadX :,:,e t4 y4- :• :: f: :•:: : : : :.'. a R+ AD fn 10 JrvTD l li D T .. C, C7wr loftump §Iation r•. 1 O = 2 ^G' t 2 Q310 2320 PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP Attachment two 4 N Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of 1985 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Good Value Homes, Inc. initiated a conditional use permit for the Maplewood Hills planned unit development at the following- described property: Lot one, Block three of Maplewood Hills Addition, Section 12, Township 28, Range 22 WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 10 This conditional use permit was initiated by Good Value Homes, Inc., pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on May 6, 1985. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be 3e The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 1985. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings -of -fact: is The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapters 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare* 39 The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. Attachment three 8 69 The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7* . The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks, 8 . The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 90 The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 10 Adherence to the site plan, dated April 15, 1985, unless a change is approved by the city's community design review board. 2. Construction must be substantially started within one year, unless an extension is granted by council. Further reviews are waived Adopted this day of , 1985. Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held . on the day of 1985, with the original on f i.l e in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permit. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1985. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota F- - (- MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT /OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: City Manager Associate Planner -- Johnson Preliminary Plat East of Montana Avenue Ed Cave and Sons, Inc. Cave's Lakewood 2nd Addition April 26, 198.5 Action by Council: Endorse Modifie Rejecte Date SUMMARY Request Approval of a preliminary plat for six single dwelling lots and a large remnant parcel to be developed later. Recommendation Approve Cave's Lakewood 2nd Addition preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall enter into a developer's agreement and submit a surety for 150 percent of the cost of required improvements and tree plantings prior to application for a final plat. Montana Avenue and all associated utilities shall be constructed to the east line of the plat. 20 Approval from Williams Brothers Pipeline to cross their easement with Montana Avenue. 3. Final grading, erosion control, drainage and utility plans must be submitted to the city engineer for approval. These plans shall comply1 with the requirements of Section 9-191(5) of the environmental protection ordinance, concerning .the preservation of the ma x lmum number of healthy trees. Trees that would be removed that are two inches or greater in diameter shall be identified on the grading plan. N r BACKGROUND Site Description 10 Gross area: 2.53 acres 2. Net area: 1.91 acres 3. Easements: a 50 foot wide Williams Brothers Pipeline easement over the east port i on ' of the site 4. Existing land use: undeveloped Surrounding Land Uses North: proposed Cave's Lakewood Addition East: undeveloped land planned and zoned for single dwellings South: undeveloped land planned and zoned for single dwellings West: a single dwelling and a four unit multiple .dwelling fronting on Montana Avenue. The multiple dwelling is approximately 65 feet west of this property. Past Actions 4- 22 -85: * Council approved the Cave's Lakewood Addition preliminary plat for the property abutting this site to the north, subject to conditions, including: 1. Arrangement must be made for a street connection with water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer between proposed Lakewood Street and Montana Avenue. A developer's agreement for private construction or c o u n c i l ' s ordering of the improvement must be accomplished prior to application for final plat approval. 2. The applicant shall enter into a developer's agreement and submit a surety for 150 percent of the cost of required improvements and tree plantings prior to application for a final plat. 3. Final grading, erosion control, drainage and utility plans must be submitted to the city engineer for approval. These plans shall comply with the requirements of Section 9-191(5) of the environmental protection ordinance, concerning the preservation of the maximum number of healthy trees. Trees that would be removed that are two inches or greater in diameter shall be identified on the grading plan. Planning 1. Land Use Plan designation: RL, residential low density 2. Zoning: R -1, single dwelling 2 3. Permitted density: 14 people /net acre 4. .Proposed density: 12.9 people /net acre 5. Compliance with city code: a. This plat meets or exceeds all subdivision and zoning code requirements. b. Section 9-191(s) states: 1) Development shall be designed to preserve the maximum number of healty trees. This requirement shall not apply to diseased trees or where a forester certifies that thinning is needed for the overall ' health of a woodlot; in which case, a specific tree removal plan must be approved by the city. 2) If trees are cut, the density of trees shall be restored to that which existed before development, but in no case shall. the applicant be required to raise the density above ten (10) trees per acre, unless part of a required planning screen. Any trees required to be planted shall be varied in species, shall maximize the use of species native to the area, shall not include any species under disease epidemic and shall be hardy under local conditions. Tree diameters shall be at least two (2) inches. 3) The applicant shall demonstrate that all grading which takes place will be conducted in a manner that preserves the root zone aeration and stability of existing trees and provides an adequate watering area equal to at least one -half of each tree's crown cover. c. The plat complies with all zoning and subdivision codes. Environmental 1. The site is wooded except for a small open area on the east side. The trees are part of a continuous woods that covers approximately forty acres of undeveloped property, planned for residential low density use. 2. There are no significant slopes or wetlands on this site. 3. No environmental assessment worksheet is required. Public Works 1. Water and sewer are available in Montana Avenue, When Cave's Lakewood Addition is constructed, water and sewer . 'will be available to the north property line of this site. 2. There is no requirement for pond ing on the site. I 3, Montana Avenue was constructed with a temporary deadend abutting the west boundary of this property, There is a need to extend this street to the east, as proposed, to provide an efficient street system for the area. Extension of the street will require the removal of many of the trees on the site, - Parks A mini -park search area is located in this vicinity (page 7) , The director of community services is recommending that the parks commission wait until the property to the east or south of this property develops before negotiating the purchase of a site, 10 Planning commission recommendation 2. City council decision following a public hearing jw Attachments 10 Location Map 2. Property Line and Zoning Map 30 Neighborhood Park Concept 4. Preliminary Plat Proposed A NORTH ST. PAUL 68 ONOLLOW AY AVE. Al 212 s AVE. 0 0 V V 30 Z ARP NTE R 4 N . WHO AVE. W Z W s V? _ i 1c W Q Q i .. foi 0 3 MCNTA a f` s M ARYLAKE RD. `•. Y N G W J Ivy AVE . Q D Q Trailer CourtQ68 (PE ivote)212 E. MARYLAND AV 120 ERGS' AVE g ST 69 In 4 Beaver MA 11OLIA AVE . LoA# ~ a C CASE 68 69 ^ : o wit e,....r.. LOCATION MAP CAVE'S LAKEWOOD 2ND ADDITION 5 Attachment 1 4 N Haplewwd Ap&rtmenU swo wovw& Larpenteur Avenue at ii1s IN m t— lyssolo lot 4pe 2 On IM 23 24 1 Liz e,:zA 2402 3 2 204 164% 04Ov' ." — — /'- f K ` 1640 •,,. + ! fin' - !! se Y F -i y a•. ! _1636 Gt') 1630 «.• .:; 0" OR lzi L-APrPE-N, -T t 3T- RI *;f ifw2 icy11.w 161 CAVE'S LAKEWOOD ADDITION7 ; r PRELIMINARY PLAT Lo V159 0 : s'Cl o LLJ 9 . (n,)13 Er N \- 10 Gc) }' 1568568 IS 7s w 2375 • 3 21 03 7369'xv E. PROPOSED LOT MONTA 0 SPLITLINEUss OUTL T rARLEI Is votAsAvoll-611 LrSA S 7 7 w w r 7i '! .•_•.. rte .',:; : ! •:.;,: i:' .-.; • _ - 0 OUTLOT C PROPOSED CAVE'S LAKEWOOD 2ND 0 ADDITION a.,v aft *4 At R PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP ' NI 6 Attachment 2 1 ____ _ ___. '..._. _,_... _'.i:::.. __... _ _ _'—__ ._ _.._.... Ll ... f - _ ___ _ —1" _ — Jr" fu ^, _ .rr•?'rt.h rn,.rx+. .A•..! s.4'++.s92ammnl•R.w. 0 0 @ 0 D Mflo Future Future R MPS MP IMF die j i I. 41VPoe ,.,I: —+ jai• 1 i • f N t .....« so t•.. ; 1•N o I AZ WOD t r KOHLINAN1t Future MP •.•, LAKE I MP J619 Perk District and Boundary 1 © FOUR 1 rwM _' `') SEASONS .,. ,... rhh mm b IOr Dtmnq k - --crtid d a - .. wd r- ... ptil 7 ( t t• 1 jl t • . / 1 tr.•.wt r . (r•t -l t ( t 2. be" P ( .. ,t- 0 Futur• A :; li • :, : Isit, tjAd4fONE, , .. too ISO r tc•L; V6 N ' , • ,cwt SIMMONS, "mom LA OL ,; L•k . t . R wf 4S r M 1 00 IdH VL e. re d Nrr, IR14.__ • I ANMN M , pw , •, It t 91. N •• nnD C+ . c+ GOAL: 1 Park/ 3000 Residents and Parks • r Within i2 Mile of Residents 3 cD c Existing Neighborhood Perk and Service Radius W Mini -Parks Proposed Neighborhood Perk and Service Radius Future sites are search areas only epared by:Nei!ghborhoodCOQ 0 0 UQ ° Rev i s eci is 6 -13 -84 c•e........,,. ftem- g • atl•r• S r. W 71 n Cvr*W w•+ H E Amww rf. %m 954" W-97"once Ott i C L MR r i u e M r f of .—. •.. .+ t ..I ••w r •.. A f , .. IA • 1 T 4A t tN F0 )•'• 11t• SO October 1980 •.• t• c«R t of I t .lh o l " sw low, { .«. • r • • . • cow 1 I i I k I tNM• I V w 1 r, 1 - CAVES LAKEWOOD4r Ater— ADDITION is =Ift • 0 % 1 . WOO b r rArery do Vero% n % rib now lilt OZ/ ti Zi1A emm ow Z,4ne Y. A* AL 4 POP - /ON 4W is - ------- M 0.NT UNDEVELOPED UNDEVELOPED DEVELOPMENT PLAN Cave's Lakewood Second Addition Preliminar Plat 8 Attachment 4 4 Poe auww sumn.=M". 7V ACORN GREENHOUSE r PUD kwx W Xv di UNDEVELOPED DEVELOPMENT PLAN Cave's Lakewood Second Addition Preliminar Plat 8 Attachment 4 4 MEMORANDUM Action by Council: TO: City Manager Endorse.._._._ r FROM City Engineer Modified.R...._......_R SUBJECT: Parking Lot Ponding Re3ecte DATE: May 6, 1985 Date A request has been received to pond storm water in a large parking lot as an alternative to a more traditional "hole in the ground" ponding f a c i l i t y . This conc is not widely used in the metro area, however, it has been used effectively in certain situations. Ten metro communities were contacted to determine if any criteria has been established. Most communities have not addressed the issue because no one has requested to pond in a parking lot. Roseville is the only community that actually encourages ponding in parking lots. No one, including Roseville, has established any criteria. Each proposal is individually eval u.ated and reviewed as it is received. Since Maplewood will likely receive additional requests of this nature at least some general criteria supported'by the city council would be helpful in reviewing the proposals. Several aspects of parking lot ponding should be addressed Obviously the depth of water is the main concern. A number of cars were measured to determine the distance from the bottom of the doors to the ground. The results of these measurements are attached. The lowest car measured had a height of 10 inches. It would seem appropriate to establish a maximum depth of 8 inches to R, allow some margi of safety. A positive emergency overflow should also be provi In other words, if water gets more than 8 inches deep it will flow overland to an area that will result in no damage to property. Another item is the length of time that a parking lot is flooded. During an unusually intense rainfall some inconvenience.is to be expected. It.is proposed that a one hour time limit be established for all the water to drain off. The other factor to consider here is the number of parking spaces affected by the ponding. . The ponding should be placed in the least used part of the parking lot. In addition some maximum, like 50', of the parking spaces affected should be established. The parking lot pond can be designed using specific criteria and standard engineering practice. However, for the design to function as designed the lot must be built properly. Since all elevations are extremely critical, special attention over and above normal parking lot inspection is a must. Traditional parking lots are not built very accurately. If a .parking lot contains a pond the accepted notions of construction are totally inadequate. An inspection program must be arranged and implemented to assure compliance with the approved design. In addition future maintenance or alteration must acknowledge the fact that ponding does take place and must be accounted for. Based on this discussion it is proposed that the following criteria be established to review parking lot ponding proposals 1. Maximum depth not to exceed eight inches for the critical 100 -year storm with.a positive surface emergency overflow. 2. Ponding in a parking lot shall dissipate completely within one hour after rainfall ceases. 3. The limits of ponded water shall not affect more than 50% of the parking spaces in the entire lot and an effort shall be made to leave the most used spec es unaffected by ponding. 4. A construction inspection program shall be submitted for approval by the city engineer prior to a building permit being issued. 5. Assurances from the owner shall be provided that future construction will not adversely affect the ponding system. MODEL GROUND TO DOOR HEIGHT 80 Chevette g 11 112" 78 Fairmont 11 112" Std. pickup 17" 81 Lynx 12" 81 LeSabre 13 84 Regal 11 " Little pickup 1311 82 Camero 10" 75 Delta 88 ll" 81 Omega 11 112" 81 Escort 12" 81 Reliant 12" Suburban Developments May 1, 1985 TIL.S...IEN HOMES INC. Residential Construction Action by Council: Endorse Modifie Rej ecte,,... Date___ City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Ave. Maplewood,Minn. 55109 - Attn: Ken Haider Dear Mr. Haider: We are hereby requesting the City of Maplewood install the public improvements necessary in Robert Tilsen's Maplewood Heights 12th- Addition and assess the rel.event improvements to the property. Thisl8 lot cul -de -sac has received preliminary plat approval and final engineering specifications are nearing completion for imme- diate construction. Yours truly, TILSEN HOMES, INC. Vice President JAT / h j t Builders of oL P HOMES 627 SOUTH SNELLING AVENUE / ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55116 / PHONE 698 -5501 z Land Developers SS C%XT ION of r4MIT10 1ES MEMORANDUM g TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner SUBJECT: Design Review Appeal - -Site Plan Review LOCATION: Beam Avenue Between Hazelwood Avenue and the Maplewood Mall APPLICANT /OWNER: Will Korstad Action by Counoil: PROJECT: Maplewood West DATE: May 2, 1985 Endorsed_....... Nodifie SUMMARY Rejecte Request Date Appeal of the board's decision denying the Maplewood West site plan, Maplewood West is a multi -use development consisting of 330 apartment units, a six -story office building and 12,000 square feet of retail space. Reasons for Denial A revised site plan has been submitted since the board meeting, which corrects the first eight reasons for denial given by the board ( see minutes on page 11). The following problems still remain: 1. The north -south drive from Beam Avenue is half on the Southlawn Plaza site to the east. The city recently approved the Southlawn Plaza site plan with their own driveway (see page -10) . The city should encourage a common driveway to reduce access conflicts on Beam Avenue. This, however, would require mutual easements between the two developers. 20 Proposed Kennard Street is still not aligned as directed by the city council. Refer to the approved concept plan on page 90 3. Further review of the drainage plan has been done since the board meeting. The plan is not workable as proposed. The applicant proposes to pond water in the parking lots, rather than in a separate ponding area. While this concept may work, the plan does not. The ponding area on the north parking lot will not hold water because of excessive slopes. There are insufficient contours shown on the east and south parking lots to determine if any ponding will occur. There are two concerns here: a. If there is inadequate ponding, the downstream storm sewer will be-overloaded. b. If there is excessive ponding, the parking lot may flood, causing damage to vehicles and inconvenience to car owners trying to get to their cars. A revised plan with more detailed contours is needed. Council should also decide whether the concept of parking lot pond ing is acceptable. This is the first time that public parking areas have been proposed as ponding areas in the city. Recommendation 1. Denial of the site plan date- stamped 4 -17 -85 for the Maplewood West project, based on the findings that the proposed alignment of Kennard Street does not meet with the city council's directive for road placement and the drainage plan is not workable and lacks enough detailed contours to evaluate it, 2. If council chooses to approve this proposal, staff recommends that. this site plan approval be subject to the following conditions: a. A conditional use permit must be obtained from the city council for the apartment use. b. Approval of plans by the community design review board does not constitute approval of a building permit. c.. All trash dumpsters shall be stored in enclosures which meet the requirements of the screening ordinance. d. Verification in writing that the north -south driveway between the Southlawn Plaza site and this site is mutually agreed upon between the two developers. e. An eight 'foot wide bituminous bike /pedestrian trail along Beam Avenue, within the right-of-way. f . An accurate breakdown of gross versus net acreage subtracting out proposed public right -of -way) . g. Grading, landscaping and architectural plans shall be submitted for board approval. A drainage plan must be approved by the city engineer. h. Parking areas shall be striped and all bituminous areas shall have continuous concrete curbing. Parking lots shall be kept in a continual state of repair. i. Site security lighting shall be provided and shall be directed or shielded so not to cause any undue glare onto adjacent properties or roadways. j. If any adjacent property is disturbed or property irons removed due to construction of the site, that property shall be restored and irons replaced by the applicant. k. The applicant shall provide a monetary guarantee, in a form acceptable to staff, in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of any site improvements that are not completed by occupancy. 2 i i 7 1. All apartment units must meet the following minimum square footage requirements: 1} One bedroom units - -580 square feet 2) Two bedroom units- -740 square feet 3 BACKGROUND Site Description 1. Gross acreage: apartment site -- 21.58; commercial site -- 11.55; total- -33.13 20 Existing land use: undeveloped Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: undeveloped property planned as DC, diversified center and zoned F, farm residential Southerly: Beam Avenue Easterly: undeveloped property planned DC and zoned BC, business commercial Westerly: St. John's Medical Campus Past Action 9- 24 -84: Council adopted the following guidelines: 1. The following streets Should be included in development plans for the area. ' a. Maplewood West Boulevard from at least Beam Avenue to the north property line of Mr. Korstad's property. Continuation of this street to County Road D may be allowed by the city, provided that traffic from Mr. Hajicek's property is reasonably distributed over Hazelwood Avenue Maplewood West Boulevard and a future Southlawn Drive.' b. A Southlawn Drive from Beam Avenue to County Road D. The alignment may have to be realigned to the west to front on properties that would benefit from the assessments. c. An east -west street (s) connecting Hazelwood Avenue and the Maplewood Mall ring road. There should be access to this street from the Korstad and Hajicek properties. 2. Specific alignments will be determined at the time that development plans are submitted to the city, except that alignments for a Maplewood West Boulevard and an east -west street to the mall ring road are approved as follows (plan on file in the community development department) : Maplewood West Boulevard as a through street,-with a curve to the east. This curve would intersect an east -west street from the mall ring road, along the Korstad -Haj icek- Homart property line, at a point between 320 and 500 feet from the west l i n e of the Homart property. 4 39 Change Maplewood West Boulevard to Kennard Street to be consistent with the city's street system and to avoid confusion with Maplewood Drive (Highway 61) . 3- 26 -85: The community design review board denied the site plan. DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Planning 1. Land use plan designation: DC 29 The DC classification refers to facilities which have a regional orientation in terms of size and scale. The area in the vicinity of Maplewood Mall is characteristic of the type of development that could be expected in such a district. This should be the most all - encompassing type of commercial district, permitting a wide variety of retail outlets, hotels, office buildings, medical centers, light industrial developments and high density residential areas. 3. Apartment density: 34 persons per net acre is allowed by code. It appears that the proposed density meets code. The exact number is hard to determine without an exact net acreage. The applicant is proposing 150 one - bedroom units and 180 two- bedroom units. This would be a calculated total of 660 persons proposed. 4. Zoning: BC 5. Section 36 -153 (2.a.) provides that multiple dwellings may, be allowed in a BC zone by conditional use permit. 6. Section 36 -122 (g.l.) of the zoning code provides the following side and rear yard building setback requirements for apartments: The minimum side and rear yard setbacks for an R -3B multiple dwelling shall be twenty (20) feet, unless the lot abuts a farm residence, residential estate, single dwelling or double dwelling zoning district, in such case=, the minimum setback shall be increased according to the provision of Subsection 36 -119 (g). g) Setbacks increased: The minimum front, side and rear yard setbacks for an R -3A multiple dwelling shall be increased, not to exceed seventy -five (75) feet, by the most restrictive of the following requirements, where the lot abuts a farm residence, residential estate, single dwelling, or double dwelling zoning district. 1) Building height: The building setbacks shall be increased two (2) feet for each one foot the building exceeds twenty -five (25) feet in height. 2) Exterior wall area: Where an exterior wall faces residentially zoned property, the setback of the wall shall be increased five (5) feet for each one thousand (1,000) square feet, or part thereof, in excess of two thousand 2,000) square feet. 5 Parks 1. The bicycle routes/trail maps in the comprehensive plan proposes an "off- street bicycle route along Beam Avenue. This trail should be provided as part of the proposed development. 240 The parks and recreation commission encourages passive recreational areas within large developments. Other Agencies A P ermit is required by the Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District. jc Attachments: 10 Location Map 29 Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Council approved Kennard Street alignment 4. Southlawn Plaza site plan 50 Community design review board minutes 6. Site plan date - stamped 4- - 17 -85 (separate attachment) 6 NEW ,= IlAnAIA fe% L-1 I- / tN 't I IT- I Ok 6 E V P- 1 0 4AWS-"S S.I ( C N I Ic L F AV ILI' LOCATION MAP 7 attachment one t 1 6r•40, _ t , ST I y • 4 L--- -- Floo,st • J 1 =, LOT -7 BL K_ C9.7 is 32.as V 1 w1 l s 1 7.73 :c. - eg•,.' ••e t t •t C. S 44 - LOT-8 HLK-! , J• I • •o - ,OCr. C041 i f l ww• ,a! - - - J O • 1 ti pv[fi OL1w y,v 21'1•i.0 • - 11•= -71 ip — - - s a s t s a rit aE s s n s s s s# s s-s s s s a at t jicai at u s e t • * w . •"•lw..•t t . ZwK • f tC _ O•c w - - • 1 r r / BCs PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP attachment two 8 4 N i " ^ ^-- ...,.,..... -.• ....._._. dodo r ............ ...... ... dodo:- __ .. _:. ......... r .. ^d dodo... .. dodo. _dodo_., _ __ _. ., M .. -„ .._.. ,.. r _r+.r..fr - . r . » T:rR:?W' rc.+.. .. M-'C.n4 * •••+w'm .••cww, (`^ m.,.p. }+S.d.t• - % dWM tRy ^.! . 'w•u•w•T"c . m.s.+r.i [.: .. . t.Le — == —,=- .L..._ ..- •t_.__,.__._ — _-- ..___Lt _ _:_.. __".- __,.._._, ..-- t < ^-,+^ ._ "L_ _.,_..2;.C§3C_: °^.....__... a. Mr ^ rv.. ..`. " ._. ::_.._.... • . .x•cam+rnk era: sa+ xlnTma+ . ar ^s. R ENIE c a S r S tOYAtf •t doom* • ' \ I • r t ILL wommom • dr.. • / .• r • • • •..• • ••••i. ` • -• •w .••a*•••m • •mow•• w• •• • • din dmri dwrt • 1 ION low 400W ab 401-100 so so i •• 0 IN 1 I ddr • d••w • t • • • •, • • • • y • o 0 OFno wom. J, dodo. 1 j n or 1 it 1 LJ MN V' ; • •4j. ----- y ..may r•MT t 1 J •• • • •dodo• .• 100 f mom 0 wad.• . • y •• • M. • • r •.•..w1•r.•r • w« • ... r. . • r •. . .d••i • • r . • . . w. «w . • • •"• r"'• " •' ' • 1w1 fir 1 • 1 • A a; va C• rIl, Olt Approv k 11 • 1 . • TRAFFIC STUDY 1011 MAFL AREA VILLIA11 1. KORSTAo rYr • •rr BENSHOOF AND ASSOCIATES Mae~ Ito • 0 wbM•1 •M Imp •m• 10 ••{ •so• • M•• COUNCIL APPROVED KENNARD STREET ALIGNMENT v j d o V .s 6 • t 0 z o r r r1 'JCI111 1.X1. .... gop.,Opt/ op Js tp lit Z r - Y t 44 J N K o•...r.. lt CZ f. I , e i 1 l NOW * , 4- 1 sVAMa r 1 t• • N OA 4 I a 0 cz:: I -- SOUTHLAWN PLAZA 10 attach N 4 N C. Maplewood West - -Site Plan (Beam Avenue)3 -26 -85 The applicant was not present at the meeting. d suggestedTheboarsuested that this item be tabled as there is not sufficient in- formation to make a decision. Board Member Juker suggested the request be denied and outline specificpecific_ additional information that should be submitted with the application. Rog- Member Peter h r enou h information has been submitted and the the comments section of the staff report a - 1- ' 1: Dimensions are not given, therefore, it is difficult to determine if alll setbacks and required dimensions are being met. Scaling . the dimensions from a plan at 100 scale leaves too much room for error. Also, the property . line dimensions, as scaled, do not match those from the county plat map. 2. The bank shown on the plans is incorrectly labeled and is actually a six-lane canopy for the bank's drive-through teller service. The bank would be on the first floor of the office. 3. The office building is actually a six -story building. The site plan, therefore, is inaccurate. 4. The north -south drive along the easterly lot line does not correspond with the proposed drive location of the Southlawn Plazas 5. There is no 15-foot landscaped parking lot setback along part of the Beam Avenue frontage. 6. A 75-foot setback is required from the north property line--55 feet is proposed. 7. The applicant has indicated that there is 120,000 square feet of retail space, not 130,000 as the site plan shows. 8. Eight hundred commercial parking spaces are required, 741 are proposed. 9. Before the city can properly review this proposal the above - mentioned d i sc re P anci es and inconsistencies should be cleared up. The road system through the site should also reflect the city council's directive and should show some coordination with the proposed adjacent development. Board Member Deans seconded Ayes- -all 11 attachment five E, a'3 Ration by Council: MEMORANDUM Endorse Modifie 8e3 eete M - TO: I City Manager date FROM: Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner SUBJECT: Review Board Appeal of Fence Placement Denial LOCATION: Ivy and Century Avenues -- Northwest Corner APPLICANTJOWNER:Richard Pearson PROJECT: Rolling Hills Mobile Home Park DATE: May 3, 1985 SUMMARY Request Mr. Pearson is appealing the Board's denial of his appeal of review board's fence denial. Refer to the attached minutes from the April 23, 1985 meeting, the applicant's letter of appeal and the staff report dated April 19, 19858 l mb enclosures R I oloiling IHils of Maplewood U. s t i L i v i n g MOBILE .HOME PARK • 2736 Mickey Lane • Maplewood, Minnesota 55119 April 24, 1985 City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Gentlemen: I am appealing the decision of the Design and Review Board of 4 -23 -85 regarding the fence along Ivy Avenue. This fence is designed for the safety and privacy of the residents in the Park (small children ) and aesthetically adds to the Park. It Will be painted or stained after the Wood Weathers since it is treated lumber. I am Willing to sign a hold - harmless agreement to the City of Maplewood relieving the City of any liability if the fence is damaged due to snow plowing or any other right of way maintenance or if any person /child is hurt because of the fence. Comments from the Park residents have been extremely favorable. They like the added safety prepaution, the privacy and the-appearance of the fence. S' e y, is Pea s rp /ak APR 2 4 1985 MEMORANDUM T0: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT /OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: City Manager Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Fence Design Ivy and Century Avenues Richard Pearson Rolling Hills Mobile Home Park April 19, 1985 SUMMARY Request Approval of a wooden board fence which would run the length of the mobile home site along Ivy and Century Avenues. See page 5. Proposal 1. The fence is intended as a decorative element, as well as for safety to keep the development's children from going_ out to the street. 2. Material: treated lumber -- unpainted. 3. The fence has been constructed along Century Avenue and extends into the Ivy Avenue r i ght -of -way. 4. The fence is proposed to continue along Ivy Avenue on the street side of the spruce trees. This would place the fence nine feet into the right-of-way, The trees, as well, are on the right-of-way, rnmmc=nf-C The fence is attractive. Though staff does not like to set a precedent by allowing fencing beyond lot lines, the site would be more attractive if the fence was on the ..street side of the trees, Code will not allow the fence ( or existing trees) , however, to be within a 25 -foot sight triangle at the intersection of the two streets unless it is no taller than 2.5 feet ( see page 6). Code requires removal of any sight obstructions within this sight triangle (see page 7) . Thirty -six feet of fence and four spruce trees are already within this area and must be removed. This memo shall serve as notification to the applicant that he has 90 days in which to correct the matter and comply with code. Recommendation Approval of the fence design and placement on the Ivy Street right -of- way at Rolling Hills Mobile Home Park, subject to: 1. The applicant shall sign a hold harmless agreement, for the city engineer's approval, relieving the city of any l i a b i l i t y if the the fence is damaged due to snow plowing or other right -of -way maintenance; and also relieving the city of any liability if any person or child is hurt because of the fence. 2. The applicant shall check and verify that his fence will not conflict with any buried utilities prior to construction. 3* A 25 -foot sight- triangle must be provided at the corner. This means that the fence and trees must be removed that are located within the triangular area bounded by the property lines and a diagonal line joining points on the property lines located 25 feet from the point of intersection of the property lines on the two intersecting streets. 2 BACKGROUND py Past Actions 4 -9 -85: The board requested that plans for the fence be submitted before construction begins. 4- 10 --85: Staff informed the applicant of the board's action. See the letter on page 4. Ordinance Re c ui rements See pages 6 through 8. mb Attachments: 1. Applicant's letter dated 4 -11 -85 2. S to f f' s f ence sketch 3. Article V- -sight obstructions 4. Fencing ordinance 3 CIT 0 M IL-AWOODAPL.s Z . ;. 01 EAST COU ROAI? B MAPLEWOOD A4IINESOTA 55109l902 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 770 -4560 Apri 1 11, 1985 Mr. Richard Pearson 1959 White Bear Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 FENCE APPROVAL REQUIRED This is to confirm our conversation at Rolling Hills Mobile Horne Park on Wednesday, April--.10, 1985 concerning the wooden fence you are-erecting, -As I explained, I asked the review board, at their meeting on April 9, 1985, whether they wish to review your fencing proposal - tTihey do and requested that you submit plans for the fence placement and desi The fence would be reviewed as the landscaping plan was, since it relates to the aesthetic appearance of the development. Again, any work done on the fence is at your own risk, since board approval has not been obtained. I'll be happy to "discuss this matter and to receive your plans for review. THOMAS EKSTRAND — ASSOCIATE PLANNER jW 4 Attachment one c 7 L.. Q f: 1' I' 1 ' 1 C> Cowl • y } i . Manor r .rte . r . ten• . as nn ins EMM Mnr_r ' 5 9 33 v 5 Attachment two i v i C 3'y r f: 1' I' 1 ' 1 C> Cowl • y } i . Manorr .rte . r . ten• . as nn ins EMM Mnr_r ' 5 9 33 v 5 Attachment two i v i C ARTICLE V. SIGHT OBSTRUCTIONS AT INTERSECTIONS Sec. 29 -135. Maximum height of certain obstructions within certain restricted areas. a) It shall be unlawful within the city for any person to install, plant, place, set out or maintain, or to allow to be installed, planted, placed, set out or maintained, or to permit to exist any tree, hedge, j shrubbery, plant, natural growth, sign. or other obstruction to the view which is higher than two (2) feet, six (6) inches above either. 1) The top of the curb return at the applicable corner of the 1 intersection, or f 2) The nearest pavement surface, where there is no curb, or 3) The existing traveled roadway at the corner in question where there is no curb or pavement, ' on property at any corner formed by intersecting streets, within ' that triangular area bounded by the property lines and a diagonal line joining points on the property lines located twenty -five (25) feet from the point of intersection of the property lines on two (2) intersecting streets, or in the case of rounded corners, toe triangular area bounded by the tangents to the curve of propertylines on two 2) intersecting streets and a diagonal line joining tangents to said curves at points that shall be located twenty -five (25) feet from the point of intersection of said tangents. the tangents referred to are those at the beginning and at the end of the curve at the corner. b) Any obstruction maintained or existing in violation of this section shall be deemed a public nuisance, and a public health and safety hazard within the meaning of Section 429.101, Minnesota statutes. (Code 1965, § 912.050; Ord. No. 252, § 1503-010,6-26-69) State law references -- Authority of city council to regulate the use of public streets and to prevent obstructions thereto, M.S. 1412.221, subd. 6; power of city council to adopt regulations requiring private property owners to remove or elimi- nate public health or safety hazards and when the city does the work to assess the charges as a special assessment, M.S.1 429.101. Sec. 29 -137. Exemptions. The provisions of this article shall not apply to permanent build- ings, public utility poles, young -saplings or trees trimmed to the. trunk so as to permit unobstructed cross visibilit to a line at least seven (7) feet above the level of the reference point as defined in section 29 -136 of this article, official traffic signs installed pursuant to Chapter 21 of this Code, any sign or structure installed pursuant to this Code or any ordinance or resolution of the city, or to places where the contour of the ground is such that there can be no cross visibility at the intersection by virtue of such contour alone. 6 Attachment three Sec. 29 -138. Enforcement. The city manager is charged with the enforcement of this article and, to that end, the city manager or any city officer or employee authorized by him, may enter upon private property within the city at reasonable hours for the purpose of determining if there is any violation of this article. Sec. 29 -139. Notice to remove — Issuance. If any tree, hedge, shrubbery, planting, natural growth, sign or other obstruction is installed, planted, placed, set out or maintained or permitted to exist in violation of this article, the city manager shall give the owner of the premises upon which the obstruction exists written notice that the said tree, hedge, shrubbery, planting, natural growth, sign or other obstruction violates the requirements of this article, creating a hazard to the safety of those persons using the streets. the notice shall inform such owner that if the obstruc- tion is not destroyed or removed or trimmed to comply with the provisions of this article within ninety (90) days from the date of notice, the city shall perform the required act and shall assess the cost thereof against the property. (Ord. No. 252, § 1503.020,6-26-69) Sec. 29 -140. Same -- Service; sign posted. The notice to remove an obstruction issued under the provisions of this article shall be given to the owner of the premises on which such obstruction exists by personal service, and, if written notice cannot be personally served upon the, owner in the city, the notice shall be sent by registered or certified mail to the owner at his last known address. In addition thereto, a sign shall be posted in the sidewalk space adjacent to the premises in question, stating that said obstruction is deemed a public nuisance, and a public health and safety hazard, and should be removed. Sec. 29 -141. Removal by city. If any obstruction existing in violation of this article is not de- stroyed, removed or trimmed ' to comply with the requirements of this article within ninety (90) days from the date of notice, the city manager shall destroy, remove or trim the obstruction and the cost shall be assessed against the property on which such obstruction exists pursuant to law, including the provisions of Sections 412.221, subdivision 6 and 429.101, Minnesota Statutes. (Ord. No. 252, § 1503.030 6- 26 -69) State law references -- Authority of city council to regulate the use of streets and other public grounds, to prevent encumbrances and obstructions, to cause en- cumbrances, obstructions, etc., to be removed and the cost assessed against the property as a special assessment, M.S. J 412.221, subd. 6; authority of city council to provide for the collection of unpaid special charges for the cost of removal or elimina tion of public health or safety hazards from private,property as a special assessment, M.S. $ 429.101. 7 ORDINANCE NO, 578 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING FENCES THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 36 -20 is hereby rescinded: Fences bordering a property in the city for the purpose of enclosing the lot or tract shall be limited to a maximum height of six (6) feet for residential uses and ten (10) feet for nonresidential uses. Such fences shall be subject to determination by the building inspector as to whether the portion of fence which on the front yard thirty (30) foot setback area of the site constitutes an impairment to clear vision for traffic purposes or impairs the view from neighboring properties in such a manner as to constitute a so- called "spite fence. " In any case of obstruction to vision affecting traffic in the public street or from neighboring properties the height shall be only such as is determined by the building inspector to be acceptable. In making such determination, the building inspector may request advice and information from both the city engineer, the police chief or persons representing these officials, and their opinion shall be given in writing to the building inspector to be retained by him as part of his per- manent record. Section 2. Section 9 -3 is hereby amended as follows: Section 9 -3, Fences. A fe'hce that is within four feet of a property.,line shall be subject to the following restrictions: 1. Fences shall have a maximum height of six feet for residential and ten feet for nonresidential uses. C 2. A fence in a front yard that is at least 809 opaque be approved by the director of community development if it is vi *ible from an adjacent dwelling. The director may approve the fence if it does not significantly impair views. 3. A fence is subject to Article V, Chapter '29 of the City's Code of Ordi- nances (Sight Obstructions at Intersections). 4. The structural supports shall not be on the outside of a fence, facing the adjacent property. 5. Barbed -wire fencing shall be prohibited except in a F, farm residence district, where livestock is being raised. b. Fences shall be constructed and maintained in a workmanlike manner. 7. The City Council may approve variations to this ordinance after notifying the adjacent owner (s) at least ten days before a meeting. Section 30 This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. 8 Attachment four C. Rolling Hills Mobile Home Park -- -Fence Des Dick Pearson, 19.59 White Bear Avenue, said he had read th e staff report, The.board questioned why the applicant began construction rior to r g of the fencepapprovalbytheboard. Mr. Pearson said he called Mr. Ekstrand on "We n •d esday and questioned if apermitwasrequiredforafence. He was informed no ermi t was required.P qui red'He explained that he intendedended to install a fence along Century and IHeindicatedwhatthefencewouldlooklike. k He, a questioned if there wasaproblemwithit; Mr. Ekstrand indicated no robl em. He felt he hadd verbalapprovaltoconstructthefence. We started the work on a ondakM y. on Tuesdayhe- informed by Mr. Ekstrand to stop work. He had the material andemployeesthereanddecidedhecouldnotstoporkatthattime,e . Secretary Ekstrand said it was on Friday, Aprily. 5 that Mr. Pearson called,Thi left two working days in which to prepare something forPgo the board meeting,Mr. Pearson did not receive verbal approval, The fence did n 'of requireabuildingpermit. Mr. Pearson was informed that the city woud have tocheck, because of site plan and conditional use ermi t i f the fencece wou 1 dhatobereviewedbytheboard. The board decided at thei r .-last meetingthattheywishedtoreviewtheplan. T g p he next day he stopped at themobilehomeparkandinformedMr. Pearson of this decision and informedomedhimanyfutureworkwouldbeathisownrisk. Board Member Muker said if the fence was not in the original conditionalermitarusepapproval, , i t i s i n violation of that permit. Mr. Pearson said he felt the fence beautified the area The board questioned if the fence would be ai nted and maintained,nP ed. Mr. Pearson said when it is needed he will paint it, He felt the fence was an asset _to the park and - a number -of -res i dents agree. - - Secretary Ekstrand said condition 21 of the condition al use permit states,No variation shall be permitted from the site plan a -p dated 3 - 21 83 withoutthedesignreviboardapprovalTheplanisthesite1a1andsa 'plan.P L/ c ping Mr. Pearson said he put up the fence for safety f childrendren i n hythe park.Secondly, it provides privacy for the park, it also improvesP the looks ofthemobilehomepark. Board Member Rossbach questioned why the fence was installed -of --way . on the right Secretary Ekstrand indicated the trees were also installed on the right -of -sway. Aesthetical the fence would look best on the street side of thetrees. 76 allow that, a hold harmless agreement would be requiredre n q d to statethatifthefeceisdamagedbysnowpletc., the city is not responsibleforrepairs, a l s o city would not be responsib for any injuries resultingfromthefencebeinglocatedontheright-of- r" Secretary kstrand said the code does require a site triangle at theetary intersection. The applicant has received notification that area of the fence is to be removed within 90 days. The fence is approximately on the lot line along Century Avenue. The boa r d ystatedthe were concerned with setting a precedent by allowing this fence to be installed on the city right -of -way. They asked if the fence was completed. M.r Pearson said it is constructed along Century Avenue, and and some on Ivy. . . He said he would have to remove the corner triangle. Board Member Peterson moved the board approve the fence design and placement on Ivy Street right -of -way - at Rolling Hills Mobile Home Park, subject to: shall a hold-harmless for the city engineer'sa1, The applicantg approval. relieving-the city of any l i a b i l i t y if the fence is damaged due to snow plowing or other right -of --way maintenance: and also relieving tge city of any 1 i ai bl i ty if any person or child is hurt because of the fence. 3. A25foot sight-triangle - foot must be provided at the corner. This means that the fence and trees must be removed that are located within the triangular area bounded by the property lines and a diagonal line joining points on the property lines located 25 feet from t he point of intersection of the property lines on the two intersecting streets. Board Member Juker. seconded Board Member Rossbach said to install a fence under 2 112 - feet at the corner sight triangle area, would ruin the appearance of the fence and he would not g be in favor of it. Voting on the motion: Ayes -- Member Peterson Nays -- Members Juker and Rossbach Member Rossbach said he voted against the motion because the fence is on the city right -of -way. Membe r Juker said her no vote is due to the applicant did not comply with the P rocedures established by the city, violated the conditional use permit and installed the fence on the right -of -way. Motion fails s LAIS, BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 5TH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 DONALD L. LA1S AREA CODE 612 JOHN F. BANNIGAN. JR. 224 -3781 PATRICK J. KELLY May 3, 19 8 5 Action by Council: Endorser.,.._______ Modif i e Rejecte Date Mr. Barry Evans Maplewood City Manager 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: Ordinance Prohibiting Golf in Parks Dear Mr. Evans: Enclosed herewith for your review and comment find a proposed form - of Ordinanoe proposing golf in City parks. I deemed it appropriate to amend that portion of the City Code pertaining to nuisances which affect peace and safety. You may wish to pass this draft on to Chief Collins for his comments. Also, Bob Odegard would likely have some valued input. I would happy to incorporate all of the additions, corrections and selections in a final draf t. Sincerely your EELY, P.A. . JB:cg Enclosure C: Gary Bastian ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE PLAYING AND /OR PRACTICING OF GOLF IN ANY PARK, PLAYGROUND AND /OR RECREATION AREA WITHIN THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY. OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the Maplewood City Code of Ordinances be, and hereby is, amended, by addition to Chapter 19 thereof, NUISANCES, of Section 19 -19 23), formerly numbered Section 19 -9 (22) and by further addition of a new Section 19 -19 (22), as follows: Ch. 19 NUISANCES ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL Sec. 19 -9. Same - Affecting Peace and Safety. 2 2) No person shall drive, putt, chip and/or in any manner play and/or practice golf in any park, playground and /or recreation area within the City of Maplewood except in areas specifically designated and posted for such use. F22} (23) All other conditions, acts or things which are liable to cause injury to the person or property of anyone. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, By Its Mayor Section 2. This order shall take effect and be in force from and after the date of its publication. Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, this day of , 1985. ATTEST: By City Clerk Ayes: Nays: r G April 29, 1985 MEMORANDUM To: City Manager Barry Evans From: Director of Public Safety Kenneth V. Collin j C,.., Subject: Assistant Fire Marshal Position Aoti ors by Coun Endorsed.., Modif i e ReJecte Date We had previously discussed making an appointment to the Assistant Fire Marshal position on July 1, 1985, and I had recommended that Officer Duane Willi be appointed to that position. I am still i favor of Officer Williams being appointed to this position, however, I would request that the appointment date be changed to May 1, 1985, or as close to that date as possible. I would further recommend that he be started at his current Police Officer salary plus longevity and that he be frozen at that salary until the current Assistant Fire Marshal salary reaches or surpasses what he is now receiving.9 I submit this for your review and approval. KVC:js cc Personnel Fil Fire Marshal File Finance Director April 29, 1985 Chief Kenneth Collins Maplewood Police Department 1380 Frost Ave. Maplewood, MN 55109 Action b Council Endozsed~~__~__~_ Modified_______ Rejeoted.-~__-~_ APR ^m 0 1985 MAPLEWOOD POLICE Chief Collins: Enclosed are some information packets and maps with the route marked on them for the Triathlon Minnesota. The town councils of Vadnais Heights, Little Canada, North Oaks, White Bear Lake and White Bear Lake Township have given us permission to use roads that travel through these communities. I am planning to attend the Maplewood town council meeting on May 13. If you need any other information please call me or Paul Hendrickson at 228-1580. Bennett Parsons Triathlon Minnesota Course Coordinator b Action by Council Endorsed. . LEASE AGREEMENT Modif i e - .__..,._.. Rejecte Date THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of 1985, by and between the COUNTY OF RAMSEY, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "the County" and the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, a municipal corporation of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "the City"; WHEREAS, the County is the owner of certain property described below and commonly known as Flicek Park; and WHEREAS, the use and control of the aforesaid property is by law vested in the Board of County Commissioners, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood is desirous of utilizing the above described property for recreational and communty purposes and desires to lease said property from the County; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY AND COUNTY AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. The County grants to the City the exclusive right to the operation, use, and enjoyment of the following described premises: Subject to Frost Avenue, that part of the Southwest quarter (SW 1/4) of the Northeast quarter (NE 1/4) of Section 16, Town 29, Range 22, together with that part of the Southeast quarter (SE 1/4) of the Northwest quarter (NW 1/4) of said Section 16, all of which lies south of the Soo Line Railway right -of -way, according to the plat thereof on -file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds of Ramsey County, Minnesota* for recreation and community use by all the people of Ramsey County* 2* TERM. This lease is for a term of five (5) years beginning on January 19, 1985 but may be terminated for any reason upon sixty (60) days notice by either party unless otherwise specified in this lease. The City, at the op tion of its governing body, may renew this lease for an additional five 5) year term from the expiration thereof. 39 USE. The City shall use the leased premises solely for purposes of public recreation or community use. Any other use by the City shall be considered a default of this lease and the County may immediately terminate this Agreement. 4. RENTe The County shall not charge any. rent under this lease, except as hereinafter specifically stated in Paragraphs 8 and 10 of this lease. 5* CHANGES OR IMPROVEMENTS* The City shall not make any changes or improvements upon the premises without the express written approval of the Ramsey County Exgcutive Directore, Any buildings, fixtures, appurtenances or other improvements which may be erected upon the premises shall be considered the property of the County. 6. MAINTENANCE OF PREMISES. The City shall be responsible for the maintenance of the property furnished under this lease. The City shall maintain the property in good repair and tenantable condition during the period of this lease in accordance with good park maintenance practices. E 79 USE BY OTHERS* Each agreement between the City and a third party for the use, occupancy or enjoyment of the premises is subject to the approval of the Ramsey County Executive Director* 8. ASSESSMENTS. The City shall pay as additional rent any and all special assessments which may be levied against the leased premises. 9. INDEMNIFICATION. The City shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify the County, its officers, employees and agents against any and all losses, judgments, liabilities, claims and costs including attorney fees, which the County may sustain or incur by reason of the City's use and enjoyment of the subject premises. 10. ASSIGNMENT, SUBLETTING AND ENCUMBRANCES. The City shall neither assign this Agreement nor sublease the premises. In addition, the City shall not encumber the premises or its leasehold interest by means of mortgage, deed of trust, or any other form of security interest. Should any liens be placed against the leased premises as a result of action by the City, the County expressly reserves the right to pay and discharge said liens after they are legally established and the City shall be legally obligated to repay the County the amount so paid as additional rent, together with interest at the same rate as i R would be required on a judgment. Any assignment, sublease or encumbrance by the City shall be considered a default and the lease may be immediately terminated by the County. 11. DEFAULT. If the City should default in the Pperformance of any condition contained in this Agreement, the County may immediately terminate this lease. 12. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. It is understood and agreed that the entire agreement of the parties is contained herein and that this lease supercedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any modification or amendment to this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by each party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Lease Agreement the day and year first above written. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD By Mayor RAMSEY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS By Warren W. Schaber, Chairman By Clerk By Harry E. Marshall, Chief Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Assistant County Attorney