The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1985 02-11 City Council PacketY :i AGENDA - Maplewood City Council 7:00 P.M., Monday, February 11, 1985 Municipal Administration Bui l di nq Meeting 85 -03 (A) C ALL TO ORDER (B) ROLL CALL (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES 10 Meeting 84 -26, December 10, 1984 (D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA (E) CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion on these i terns . If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 10 Accounts Payable 2. Time Extension*- Gervais Overtook 3. Transfer to Close Improvement Projects 4. 1985 Fee Schedule for Reservation of Park Facilities (F) PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 - a. Park Acquisition: Geranium Ave. b. PUD : N.W. of Ferndale & Ivy (Beaver Creek Apts.) c. Tax- exempt mortgage Revenue Financing: Beaver Creek Apts. d. Tax-increment Project: Beaver Creek Area 2. 7:10 - Rezoning: 2800 -12 White Bear (4 Votes) 3. 7:20 - Rezoning: 2086 Edgerton (4 Votes) 4. 7:30 - Rezoning: 2150 McMenemy (4 Votes) 5. 7:40 - Code Amendment: Trash Enclosures (2nd.Readinq -4 Votes) (G) AWHRD OF BIDS (H} UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Resolution on Comparable Worth 2. Beaver Lake Storm Project 3. Frost Ave. Reconstruction 4. Ordinance on Sewer Rates (2nd Reading) 5. Appointments to Boards & Commissions NEW BUSINESS 1. Joseph Co. Industrial Revenue Bond °t 2. Reaort of Park & Recreation Committee 3. Cope Park Expansion J 4. Improvement to Ball Parks 50 Parking Zone Change (Manton) 6. Ramsey Co.. Computer Mapping (J.) VISITOR PRESENTATIONS (K) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 2. 3. 4. 5. 6* 7. - 8. 9. 10. (L.) ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS ( M) ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, December 10, 1984 F. Council Chambers, M u n i c i p a l B u i l d i n g Meeting No. 84 -26 A. CALL TO ORDER • Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council A regular meeting of the City ty Counci 1 of Map 1 ew , Chambers , M u n i c i p a l B u i l d i n g , an d was called to order at 7: P.M. by Mayor Greavu. :Be ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gar W. Bastian, Councilmember Present Gary MaryLee Maida, Councilmember Michael T . Wa s i t uk , Councilmember Present C. .AP PROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Meeting 84 -23 (October 22, 1984) Councilmember Maida moved to approve the Minutes No. 84 -23 (October 22, 1984) as correc Page 11 Item K -3c - Delete "curb and gutter ". Seconded b y Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. - D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. Mall Traffic 2. Developer's Meeting 3. Commission Interviews 4. Ordinance Policies 5. Update 6. Food Shelves 7. Chamber Party Be Developer's Committee E. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. CONSENT AGENDA Ayes - all. Council removed `Item E -2 from the Consent Agenda to become I -7. • seconded b Councilmember Maida, Ayes,- all, to approve Councilmember Bastian moved, y the Consent Agenda Items 1, 3 and 4 as recommended: 1. Accounts Payable ' Expenses, Check re Approved the accounts (Part I - Fees, Services, p inter dated November 9 28, 1984 through Dec , ember 3 1984 - $258,240..28: Part II - Payroll. dated November 12/10 30, 1984 - $80,560.10) in the amount of $338,800.38. Peter Bronson Age 10 Transfiguration School 2. Discussed under I -7. Dav i d Pre i ner Age 11 Transfiguration School 3. Paramedic Bill - Cancellation Ang i e Bourasa Age 11 Transfiguration School Cancelled the paramedic bill as requested by Robert V. Wiltso in the amount of $46.00 due to hardship. 1ST Place Becky Ru s i nak Age 10 4. Interfund Transfer - Utility 2nd Place Robby Warwick Age 10 _Approved the following transfers: 3rd Place Susan Hesse Age 10 FROM Park s i de Fire D i s t r i c t TO S peci � al Assessment Fun $ 91,875 W.A.C. Fund 1973 Bonds ( #22) 71,700 Hydrant Fund 1977 Bonds ( #25) 6,010 Hydrant Fund. 1979 Bonds ( #27) 2,050 Sewer Fund 1979 Bonds (#27) Second p lace winners receive a $15 check from their District Fire Department. Third P 1 ace winners receive a $5 check from . their D i E -A FIRE C HIEFS POSTER CONTEST Posters were judged and evaluated by fire personnel. �. State Fire Chief's Poster Contest a. Deputy Fire Marshal James Embertson introduced representatives from the East County Line, Gladstone, and Park s i de Fire Districts who presented awards to the winners. of the 1984 Minnesota State Fire Chief's Poster Contest as follows: East County Line Fire District 1st Place Peter Bronson Age 10 Transfiguration School 2nd Place Dav i d Pre i ner Age 11 Transfiguration School 3rd Pla Ang i e Bourasa Age 11 Transfiguration School Gladstone Fire D i s t r i c t 1ST Place Becky Ru s i nak Age 10 Weaver School 2nd Place Robby Warwick Age 10 Weaver School 3rd Place Susan Hesse Age 10 Presentation School Park s i de Fire D i s t r i c t 1st Place Tom Downs Age 10 St. Jerome's School 2nd Place Dan Hannigan Age 10 St. Jerome's School 3rd Place Stacy Rauguth Age 9 Edgerton School First place winners receive a $25 check from their District Fire Department and a Tonka. Toy a e r i a l fire truck donated by Tonka Toy Corporation, Minneapolis. Second p lace winners receive a $15 check from their District Fire Department. Third P 1 ace winners receive a $5 check from . their D i s t r i c t Fire Department. Posters were judged and evaluated by fire personnel. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2 - 121 1 . 7:00 P.M., P l a n Amendment and Rezoning - 2150 McMenemy (Brooks) convened the.meetin for public hearing regarding the proposed. a. Mayor Greavu conv g P plan amendment from RL to LSC.and the proposed rezoning from BC to NC the property known as Brooks Superette, 2150 McMenemy. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. C.. Director of Community Development 1 o ment Geoff Olson presented the P l a n n i n g Commission recommendation. d. A representative i ve of Brooks spoke in opposition to the zone change. P . e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were.heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Councilmember Maida introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: (Plan Amendment) 84 - 12 - 185 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the Map 1 ewood Com- P rehensive Plan from RL, residential low density to LSC, limited service commercial for 2150 McMenemy.Street; WHEREAS the P rocedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. This plan amendment was initiated by the City of Maplewood. 2. The Maplewood P l a n n i n g Commission h e l d a public hearing on November . 5 , 1984 to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All l p ersons present at said hearing were given an. opportunity to be heard and resent written statements. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said Plan Amendment be app • P • roved. od City t Council considered said P l a n Amendment on December 3. The Maplewo y 10 1984. The Council considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and. City Staff. REFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above NOW, THE described Plan Amedment be approved on the basis of the following findings o f fact: 1. The site is on the corner two collector streets. 2 . The City y PP recent a pproved two similar p l a n amendments at 1915 Castle Avenue a.nd, 1690 English Street. 3. This site has been used commercially since the early 19,60's. Seconded by Cou nci lmember Wasi luk. Ayes - Counci lmembers Anderson, Bastian, Maida and Wa s i l uk . Nays - Mayor Greavu. 3 _ 12/10 i . Counc i lmember Ma i da introduced the f o l l o w i n g r e s o l u t i o n and moved its adoption: (Rezoning) 84 - 12 - 186 WHEREAS the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, Business Commercial to NC, Neighborhood Commercial for the northerly 140 feet of the following described property: The North 154 feet of the West one (1) acre of the North half of the North half N 1/2 of N.1 /2) of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter (NW 112 of NW 1/4) of Section 17, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, Village of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, subject to I the rights of the public in the North 33 feet thereof and the West 33 feet thereof, for road purposes, according to the United States Government Survey thereof. This property i p s also known as 2150 Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on November • Council 1 that said rezoning n 5, 1984. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Co 9 be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on December 10, 1984 • P fished and mailed to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was pub pursuant to p law. All P ersons resent at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard P and p resent written statements. The Council also considered reports and recom- mendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED. BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above described rezoning be denied and the property be rezoned to R -1, residence district (single dwelling), on the basis of the following findings of fact: The proposed change is consistent with 1. p P 9 - the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. proposed change wi 11 serve the best interests and conveniences of 3. The g the community, where a p p l i c a b l e and the p u b l i c welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and f ire - protection and schools. Seconded by Cou n c ilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian, Maida and Wasi luk. Nays - Mayor Greavu. - 4 - 12110 2. 7:10 P.M. Plan Amendment and Rezoning - Larpenteur and Edgerton a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposed p l a n amendment from RL ' to LSC and ' the proposed rezoning from BC and R -3 to NC and R -2 for the property on Larpenteur Avenue between Jessie Street and Edgerton Street. b. Manager Evans presented the staff. report. c. Director of Community Development Geoff Olson presented the Planning Commission report. d. Mr. John Blomquist spoke in opposition to the proposal. e. Mayo Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following were heard: Ted Davis, 546 E. Larpenteur W. Rafferty, 545 E. Larpenteur John Decker, 598 E. Larpenteur Shirley Files, 1695 Edgerton. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g . Counc i lmember Bastian moved to deny the request for the P l a n Amendment from Rf to I Sr_ Seconded by Counc i lmember Was i l uk . Ayes all. i. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 84 - 12 - 187 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from R-3, m u l t i p l e dwelling and . B C, business commercial to R -2, double dwelling for the following described property: Lots 16 -18 and Lots 12 -15, Block Eight, King's. Addition to the City of St. Paul. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Map 1 ewood,. Code of Ordinances. 2. - T h i s rezoning was rev i ewed by the Maplewood P l a n n i n g Commission on October 15 1984. The Plannin g Commission recommended to the City.Council that said re- zoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council h e l d a public hearing on December 10, 1984 to consider this rezoning*. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports a re- commendations of the City Staff and P l a n n i n g Commission NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: -5- 12/10 1. The-proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. Z. R 2, double-dwelling 9 zonin would provide the maximum flexibility for developing the s i t e consistent with the intent of the land use p l a n and zoning code. 3 . The proposed change w i l l not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that P P the use of the P roperty adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or p l a n is adequately safeguarded* 4. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare. 5. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. 6. An R -2 zone would preserve the r e s i d e n t i a l character of the neighborhood, while a l l o w i n g a reasonable use of the property. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes all. R, 3. 7:20 P.M. Variance - 1918 Beam Avenue a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Best Buy Company (Sound of Music), 1918 Beam Avenue, for a variance to have a wooden trash dumpster enclosure rather than one of masonry construction as code requires. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Board Member Fran Juker presented th.e Community Design Review Board recommendat- ion. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. done were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Maida moved to deny the request of Best Buy Company (Sound of Music) for a variance to ave a wooden trash dumpster enclosure. Seconded by Councilmember .Bastian . Ayes - all. 4. 7:30 P . M , 'Cond i t i ona 1 Use Permit - Highway 36 and Tracks a Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of 3M N a t i o n a l . Advertising Company for a cond.it i ona 1 use permit to erect a double faced billboard wi th i n 500 feet of a dwelling. b. ..Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Board Member Fran Juker presented the Community Design Review Board report. - 6 12/10 in the National Advertising Company, spoke d. Mr. Gerald Osterloo, representing on behalf of the proposal* e. Mayor Greavu called.for proponents. None were heard. called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu c pp 9 y . Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Councilmember Anderson moved to deny the request of 3M National Advertising Company for a conditional use permit to erect--a ou e ace i oar on Kighway wi in ee o a we ing. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluke Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian, Maida and Wasiluk. Nays - Mayor Greavu. 5. 7:40 P.M. Prelininary Plat and Variance - Beebe Road (Westwinds) a. Mayor Greavu c 9 onvened the meetin for . a public hearing regarding the request Invest nc. for of Townhome Invest Co., � approval of a four lot multiple dwelling plat and a variance to the ordinance requiring 120 cubic feet o f extra e stora 9 P space to be prow,i ded for eac h u n i t within the m a i n building . The applicant is . proposing storage space in the garages. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Board Member Fran Juker p resented the Community Design Review Board recom -. mendation. d. A representative of To wnhome I nvestment Company spoke in favor of the proposal. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. 9 Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Councilmember Bastian moved approval of the Westwi nds of Maplewood Pre 1 i mi nary Plat, to be located on Bee a Ro a nor o e y o Map ewood - wa er b oos - ter station,, or a one year perio Seconded b y Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. i. Mayor Greavu introduced the f o l l owing resolution 1 ut i on and moved its adoption _ 84 - 12 -- 188 WHEREAS, Town Home Investment Company, Inc. applied for a varia.nce for the following described property: W 1 The West 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the S 4 of the SE 1/4 except the South / 260 feet thereof, and also so exce p t the East 33 feet thereof , in Section 14, Township 29, Runge 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. • Maplewood that ewood Code of Ordinances requi WHEREAS, Section 36 -110 of the M p ace provided ded for each multiple dwe 1 , ' n u n i t feet of stor s 1 i g there be 120 cubic 9 P _ 7 12/10 within the main building; WHEREAS the applicant is proposing the storage spaces within the detached garages, requiring a variance; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on October 23, 1984. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Community Design Review Board on November 27, 19840 The Baord recommended to the City Council that said variance be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a p u b l i c hearing on December 10, 1984 to-consider th i s variance . Notice thereof was published i sh ed and mailed pursuant to law. All P ersons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard present resent written statements. The Council also considered reports and recom- mendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1 The spirit and intent of the ordinance would be met since the storage space would be provided. e lockers in the garage 2. Locating the storage permits a better use of the 9 9 P floor space within the main building. Seconded b y Councilmember Maida. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Ander son and Maida. Nays - Councilmembers Bastian and Was i 1 uk . 6. 7:50 P.M., 2520 Clarence (Kelly) Greavu convened the meeting for public hearing regarding the request a. Mayor Grea 9 P of Ronald D. Kell y to rezone 2520 Clarence from R - Single Dwelling to R-2. Double Dwelling. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c . Mrs. Jane Kelly, 2520 Clarence Street,' spoke on behalf of the request. d. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. osal. The following voiced their opinions: Mrs. Richard Schmidt, owns the empty lot south of 2559 Clarence. e. Mayor Greavu closed the p u b l i c hearing. f. Mayor Greavu moved to deny the request of Ronald D. Kelly to rezone 2520 Clar- ence from R -1 to Seconded by Councilmem.ber Anderson. G. AWA OF BIDS Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Ander- son, Bastian and Wasiluk. Nays - Councilmember Maida. _ 8 _ 12110 None. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Kennel Permit - 1231 Shryer Avenue a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Robert and Marion Newbauer, 1231 Shryer Avenue, the applicants, spoke on behalf of their request for a kennel license to house three (3) dogs as pets. c. Charles and Pat Hirsch, 1212 E. Skillman, spoke of all the problems the exist- ing kennel has caused. d. Councilmember Bastian approved a small kennel license for three (3) dogs for Mrs. Marion Newbauer, 1231 Shryer-Avenue, license to expire arc , w en one dog is to be from the premise. Seconded by Councilmember Was i 1 uk . Ayes - all. 2. Purchase of Park Land From School Board (Goodrich) a Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mayor Greavu moved to authorize signing of a purchase agreement with School District 622 for the purchase of apiece OT iand which includes part of e parking o a e Goodrich Field in e amour o , Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. s c. Councilmember Anderson moved to approve an appropriation of from the P.A.C. Funds to cover t e cos of-the property. Seconded by Mayor Greavu, I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Code Amendment: Swimming Pools Ayes - all. a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson moved first reading of an ordinance amending the utility line clearances from swimming pools o match e requiremen s o e a Iona Electrical Code an e National ec rica a e y Code. Seconded by Councilmember Ma i da . Ayes - all, 2. Code Amendment- Fences a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. i lmember Ma i da moved first reading n of an ord i na'nce for a code amendment b. Count g regarding fences as follows prohibit 1 Revise the code to structura 1 supports on the outside of boundary . fencing (Council proposa 1) . g - 12110 2 . Combine the e s s e n t i a l l y duplicate Sections 9 -3 and 36 -20 of City Code . -` Section 36 -20 of the zoning code would be rescinded (staff proposal). 3. Expand the code to address the issues of barbed -wire fences and fence maintenance,. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 3. Code Amendment: Setbacks and Lot Dimensions a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Maida moved first reading of an ordinance amending the Code to allow additions and lot divisions to exis ing singe dweITings in require setbacks without having to approve a variance. Seconded by Councilmember W a s i l u k . , Ayes - all. 4. Pha 1 en Place Traff i s a. Manager Evans presented the staff report.. b. Director of P u b l i c Works Ken Haider presented the specifics of the report. c. Councilmember Wasiluk moved to accept the report. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 5. Walter Street Feasibility a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. r' b . Councilmember Wasiluk moved to table i ndef i net ly the Walter Street f e a s i b i l i t y . Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 6,, No Smoking (Wasiluk) a. Councilmember Wasiluk moved that there be "no smoking" during Council meetings. Seconded b y Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson and Wasiluk. Nays - Mayor Greavu and Councilmember Maida. Councilmember Bastian abstained. 70 1985 Temporary Pay Rates a. Mana.ger.Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption : 84 -11 -189 WHEREAS, according to the Minnesota Public Employees Labor Relations Act, part-time employees who do not work more than 14 hours per week and temporary employees who do not work in excess of 67 days in a calendar year are not covered by union wage rates. 10 - 12110 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the following pay rate maximums are hereby established for temporary and art -time employees retroactive to January 1, 19859 P Y P P Recreation worker $10.50 per hour Recreation official 15.75 per game Puppeteers 26.25 per.show Accountant 13.20 per hour Administrative assistant 7.35 per hour Secretary 7.48 per hour Accounting Clerk 7.48 per hour Clerk- Typist 6.13 per hour Election Judge 5.00 per hour Election P recinct chairman 5.25 per hour Laborer 5.25 per hour Engineering Aide 6.10 per hour Janitor 4.45 per hour BE.IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the recreation workers who drag ballfields may be p a i d up to $4.00 per field in l i e u of an hourly payrate. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the minimum pay rates for each of the above be (1) the amount specified by State law for those positions covered and (2) $2.50 per hour for those positions not covered by State law. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager shall have the authority to set the pay rate within the above ranges. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson.. Ayes - all. J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Mall Traffic a. Cou ncilmember Bastian commented on the traffic around the mall. He suggested .a "No U Turn" s i g n be i n s t a l l e d at Wood lyn and Lydia . 2. Developers Meeting a. Councilmember Bastian reported on the Developers meeting and questioned "what is next ? ". - 11 - 12110 b. Staff is to review the questions-and statements presented, at the meeting. c, Council stated the next meeting should be after the first of the year. 3. Commissions Interviews a, Councilmember Bastian asked when the interviews for the Commission vacancies will be held. b. Council established Thursday, December 27, 1984 at 5:30 P.M. at the Public Works Facility as the date to interview commission candidates* 4. Ordinance. Policies a. Councilmember Bastian i questioned if a resident has a problem who can. he call s an to discuss it. b. - Counc i 1 stated the Manager should be informed. 5. Update a Councilmember Bastian requested an update of pending l i t i g a t i o n s * 6. Food Shelves a. Councilmember Bastian moved that the money being put aside for a Commissioners Party be donated to the Nor . Paul-Emergency FooJ Shelf Program. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 7. Chamber Party Mayor Greavu stated the North Suburban Chamber Party will be held December 20, 1984 at 4:30 P.M. at the Gladstone House. 8. Developers Committee a. Mayor y or a Greavu questioned if a developers committee should be established to entice business into Maplewood. b. Staff to investigate. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS None. M ADJOURNMENT 10:17 P.M. City Clerk 12 - 12/10 JANUARY MANUAL CHECKS PAGE 1 IYV5 CI jF M44FL-W� ;3D CME REvT ST _R CH - OCK NJ& D:,TE A 0J "V v 'N 0 ITEM DESCRIFT:0 X11 1 ? �2/� 1 / 5 525. � MA�Lrl�EAF OFFICIALS P RGR4MS 52F. 0 1` 4b 2/,_ 1 185 600 ERNST RICHARD QEFU ^!D .. rp 5 56�.. M� -. L e - PL = _ -& AF DFr IALT ?aCGROM; 66^. �0 4.9T9.�;; MANN STATE TPE� MU T^ VET' L.0 P� ,, 1 r►�,q 5 295 ._u Mitti'� STMT= TR:.�S M'DTCK V .H LTC PI 5.?74.7 . 14:._5 �/_ X95 363.x0 AFSCM U ";IC'V D`J =S PPi . 1 4,-. 5 .� ,. ., 2/. � 5 5. 7 4 c M- A SC = Utii ^.� DLl5 P8L 369.54 X14^?; .,? /.;1f 5 1b•.3R1.5� CTY CNTY rR UNION C�cJ:T UN Pr 16 3Q1 5 _14,15 ,, ?!; 11 2.146.34 ICMA 07FEERRED COMA X14: ; -21" 1 /r5 922.41 I�'�a DEFERRED CCMc 3 v ^6?. 75 4 "t�Z �. �/f- 1 fF5 1o M "! F_DrPA_ SAVINGS FaT PeL 1405 2 = 2/:1 / 5 337.5) Mti FED ='RAi. SAV?NGS 8C P SavitiGj tiSS 16,902.33 14 1 1121'^ 1 /85 31 MN M U T UAL L IFT INS :NSUQANC� 71O a 11 4Mb5 L 2/ 1 5 8.964.2 MN ST MMM /REVENUE SWT P3L 9, 964 2 ;.14+�� ..2/ - )1185 25954 MN STITE R:TTREMFNT DEFERRED COMP Page 2 CHECK REST ST- R V=N0Y; MN STATtE RiTIRrMr;,�T M A NN STAT= TR S S MINN STAT= TR= AS MN ST "T= TREAS S/S MN STATE TREAS S/S ITEM DESCRIPT10' DEFERRED COMF MCT IV' R VEE N L1C P: M :jT OR VE4 LT C t,. C/S 9L S/S P3L MN TEA'�ST -R; U Cr �:i : OtJ� PAL RAGS. Y �NTY COURT AMB 3iLLS STEF= =y S= UTT C,'4NT:v= ALL3WA ":C Mti 7 4rRSY :CONCMir CO PY'M D =E JMY G ART W-''RK CAN'AIA LI== ASSUR I'V;U:z,«'VC- DALEY PAT `FL S I NS PEC• 30 KA *!E RJSEMARY P /R DcDULT. MT NN '9 5 CITY JF MA W�"'' MOTO VEh C .i MINN A MUU NT TREAS �1 4 kit rN - .:Z /�1 /R5 18.4 a 4 4 4�.,�,9 ..2�5 2 684.53 . ;1 4 2/,:1185 305 i i 2.989.53 .14 '2 1 1 8 5 4 .'7 4y1 ' .:2/�1 /R5 4,4:113.24 8 1 6 ' 4R _1 4 "1 .. 2/;- 1 /R 5 676.52. 676.5 1 4 21 54 54� r. 1 4r -4 ,. 1 fkc 75., 35 9999 x„ *,►♦+► ? - 1 51? _ X 2/ - 1 5 5".� - 5 ►� � f .1 5 5 .,2 F�5 19457999 1 t � 3 a 2^ 663920 t :« s�► t "1 5K2 2 /.:1 /RS 1 415 -D 145 " LZ 5v 4959 243.:.'J CHECK REST ST- R V=N0Y; MN STATtE RiTIRrMr;,�T M A NN STAT= TR S S MINN STAT= TR= AS MN ST "T= TREAS S/S MN STATE TREAS S/S ITEM DESCRIPT10' DEFERRED COMF MCT IV' R VEE N L1C P: M :jT OR VE4 LT C t,. C/S 9L S/S P3L MN TEA'�ST -R; U Cr �:i : OtJ� PAL RAGS. Y �NTY COURT AMB 3iLLS STEF= =y S= UTT C,'4NT:v= ALL3WA ":C Mti 7 4rRSY :CONCMir CO PY'M D =E JMY G ART W-''RK CAN'AIA LI== ASSUR I'V;U:z,«'VC- DALEY PAT `FL S I NS PEC• 30 KA *!E RJSEMARY P /R DcDULT. MT NN STtT= TREAS MOTO VEh LI C MINN STAT_ TREAS MGTCR VcI- LIC { _ page 3 , �•5 CITY )F MIFL_Wln^ r . MT C K RLGTST -R CK `: ^. 3 ?� 4M pUNT V�ND ^R ITEM D£S..CRZP ? ON 4 2 * , / 21 9 936.50 c c. T_L_ C' 'N TR A CT PYM 21 . 1 36.5 3 ^ �:?/�1 �R5 25.'0 METRO COUVCIL T�AV.L T�AZtiZ':G 25. 0 `�1t�;c►5 �?J�'1 Jr5 ?��.,'1 E5RL r�aDWr.1 07 K�FU' �J { � T TQ' .,� MANN 4 _ m 0R V l PQ _15U�y �2/.1 5 35.5 MI NN STATE TR =AS MCT0K V =�- L:C P? 3 # 30) + .�,� T :OFF IC U;: PL :�.S 1t 7t � r ,-, . q « �� /_.1 / 5 0 57 343.5 SIGNALS R =STR +' 4M� 343.57 j 4_ _ ? /_'! /�5 g4. ^' CI.t- JF CDURL - r CLK DF CCLRT FIL �4 . 1 V + ft r ft 1r t �r 1 l'- o� .. _/- 1 /F >5 2 l% �T T�E'A M: N ! � � S M" T �R V_H LI C PF :Zf vCJ.9 1 / ? 5 111.' 1 MTNN ST T?7A.3 M: %; V:.H Li F 2 9 4D6.2 O 2 50".. u P'1 STuNSTL� �� ?:,GE f- 4Q 15.13 NAIL k~6. ;TRAR 1 7MT AMT A -G 15.�n + Wage 4 t 1UK 5 Cj i Y >r MAPL`' WD:'D CHECK RELGIST=R - D,TE M � t A..JU ti V.'VDOR ITEM DESCRIPTiO.". 1��!b5 •.?/�1 /85 135.56 PN COMq/�� TA Y: PBL 135* °6 t i X10 *�0� �2/u� X45 'l .246 *'0 MINN ST ? =AS M^TuR VE or N l':C ?i 341. t0 MTNN ;-� T?.IS M ^..TOR V LIC 1 ir,5 $. 35 5 * _ w� ,ONTR M ., � , PPL fi,u35.75 1 f" 5 ?•5 ^5 tM +NR; STAT= TRE' S M,�TO� yc•�; LTC ° 1 ��y -21_ X95 27�.:' MINK ST T� �S �±�TSR V�� LT �z1 �R�� ..?/�1 2 /,. 1 ' � 5 1 3?.� w MI hN ST T? =A S M ^.-T' V=;' LIC , r +�, �,;.0 _ /R 174. 0 v Mi R',! ST Tz =Ac ±��T V;-+-, L'�. ° �' 322. _ _ MI NN ST T�E M nr.:) - V_H LIC 3, 40Q. 75 t t t R 4gR. �'! 49R MIN'S ST TD SU?T:� PtiL 4Q$* 1 Q 1 ,o3J.5u M: 1ti'k1 STAT= TRrAS MuT R V L1 r p Z �� .1 /F5 16Q. �:: Mi * ±V S'' AT: T E�.S MCT�-c V .H Li 2 _ .:22U_ .�- -?/ : 1 / 225. ^'! UN 'V OF MINN T;RA Ur L TRAIN;. - .*!G 225.',0 �.13al. aft, :�2/�:1 /�5 1 ,222.50 - MAoL= i�Q�t' 4TN ASSv_ ?POGR I • 222.5 3Mo9 ..� _ �2/�1/Sa 2,�13.5D MrNNI STAT = TR:.AS -r -' lLTOR VEH L_C MST •�R VLh L: C r �. �23mb9 L2/..1 /fi5 473.0 � M_N'V S 4T. TR�.,� 2,486 *50 .�23�r �.2/�1 �R5 756 *95 N'o So o UTILITIES 756.45 f - F Page 5 1 5 C:TY OF MA FL CHEC R�.ti ?ST�R .urC D TL AMDUNT V - I TF DFSCr IPTTD�. 7 _ �43. 5 ., D2 5 PROGR!MS 1,5u1..J 'c4: 5? a Z /_ 1 /R5 47w *j0 YVL'T7�'S o "STR PROGRAMS ' 47C.)J ..�[, r4v v..2 /�,� /R3 97.�D CL�R�C OF ColUR T CNTY F.ILT - %G FEE +tx t yr t L4�'�0 ..Z /_'' / Z,335.6J MI NA) STaT� T�?y�. M'T�R VAN LA. PF '` 4 ► _42 /1i � R5 242.:;J MI! STaT_ TR,aS MST 3Q V;-'H LIC PE 2,577.60 ` ;:L/ � 5 3'',545.47 NI ST PAU, CITY OF C�'yTRACT PYM 37' • 545.4'1 * sltx # �2/_1 ! ; 5 68 . NS P UTIL =� ^c5,: 5i 5 32. r' PETERSON RARRY R =FUND 32. r 53 l_R r!." ZarPA FP-') REFU ltk4 !! X25 .o4 2/ 1 / 1 •�0".�`' rMa LOY_ -E B�NrFIT DEN CLAIM - ,15 ,.2 /L1 �;�5 3•SSZ.56 MT N4 STAT_ TR A M ^TOR V� LIC P� r - IC MINkl STAT; TR -& S M TJR VE_ LIC P� ^ 25No9 ..2/;.1/5 39.JO M'NN STAT: TR;.AS MCTOR V_N L_C B P# L25M69 J2/..11Q5 23R.LU MI NN ST44T_ TRE:AS M)TIR YCH LIC 1 %25Mbq L2 /)l 155 3539A MiN4 STA = TREAS M V L" LIC PS 4.272o56 i= - r l i' I i i Wage 6 CHECK RESI STS P. AMOU"4T v N1)0� ITEM DESCQIPTI 7 191:5 CTT Y vF MAPL =u Y)1 9146.51 Mki ST TREAS Pt PERA P8L 16.544.42 CHECK 363.90 F S K- AF.SC U V i �y DUE PLIL 5, ' ::25 2/ ,1 !35 369.64 25 "75 2 /-"l 5 16 CTY CNTY CREDIT UN - 19L. 16,264,5D _2/;1 /S5 2.294.64 5 - 21 1/5 7 2.41 ICMA EFE.RRED CCMP PP 3 314. MN REV" FIT ASPIC 'JQ NC_ 314,' 17.445.90 1 MN F:JlRA SAVINGS FWT PBL 17.44.90 313.'^ MN MJTUAL LIFE 'IT wSUR NC" 310• 9nQ, MN ST 3OMB' S WT a9L 9.9n'9, 52 + 25.54 MN ST RcTIR.EwENT D ^F =RREJ Como 3.34'7.23 MINN ST TR =AS 419.:10 MTNN STAT TR:.ASrTCK V_N LTC P� 1 R •46 MN ST R E TIR E MENT - ,2V 1 /R:) 3, 4.474.14 MN ST TRc4S S/� SlS P9L 4 • 4'14.1 4 MN ST TR#E5S Sl3 S/S P 8048,2!3 X26 9 j 2/:;1 iR � 0M ;.2 /:. 1 / A� 2 1 5 u2o 2 /C1 /S5 Wage 6 CHECK RESI STS P. AMOU"4T v N1)0� ITEM DESCQIPTI 7 MN ST TREaS PERA PER4 PBL 9146.51 Mki ST TREAS Pt PERA P8L 16.544.42 363.90 F S K- AF.SC U V i �y DUE PLIL 5, ' AFSC!�= Utij �N DUE PAL 369.64 16 CTY CNTY CREDIT UN - 19L. 16,264,5D 2.294.64 P I - MA n'FE�c ED CC' r R. 7 2.41 ICMA EFE.RRED CCMP PP 3 314. MN REV" FIT ASPIC 'JQ NC_ 314,' 17.445.90 1 MN F:JlRA SAVINGS FWT PBL 17.44.90 313.'^ MN MJTUAL LIFE 'IT wSUR NC" 310• 9nQ, MN ST 3OMB' S WT a9L 9.9n'9, 52 + 25.54 MN ST RcTIR.EwENT D ^F =RREJ Como 3.34'7.23 MINN ST TR =AS MT T CR V 4 LIC P 419.:10 MTNN STAT TR:.ASrTCK V_N LTC P� 1 R •46 MN ST R E TIR E MENT OEFERRE,D COMP 3, 4.474.14 MN ST TRc4S S/� SlS P9L 4 • 4'14.1 4 MN ST TR#E5S Sl3 S/S P 8048,2!3 1y� 5 CITY OF MAPLLW�OO LHc� K c r TREAS FWV. 31 u 2 ?5 F'JV^ 65 lk FUNS` 92 TOTAL FUN^ 94 C2yuo4 ,.2/ ,:1IR5 �7 .: �� 2/.1 /S5 43;V6Q L2/_1/R 71 r4 .2/:1 / .9 5 A µ0U NIT 163.98 163.98 2 389. ^^ 3.239. t 2,.!T5•'-`0 2,,75 - 0 2v�.� 2.515. 253. .)] 2,769 Q.5 . 95 I 12. =� 2.0R 212,450.55 37 21 0 53 7 .62 1 9 r1 3 r •^ n 2 65.5 33.59 Page 7 CHECK REGISTER V'�.l00 I TE M DES CRiPTION WISC DEPT OF REVENl3E SST P3L CANT: NJI�v�S cO TRAVEL TRAI�4ING MINN STA T= TREA S �! �T "'O'R VET LTC P8 ST tT . OF 41 NN MCT , "J"R V EN LICFBL OETrRSON B 07 - - T �i'vcR UNIV OF MT.NN MINN STET= TRF4S M INN STATE Trtr:S TQM =L TRAI14ING MC ,, TOR UEN LIC P MST -R V =4' LIC P CLIERK OF COURT Mrrjm TAT_ TR :;; MINM STAT= TREAS FWV. 31 TOTAL F'JV^ 65 TOTAL FUNS` 92 TOTAL FUN^ 94 TOTAL TtTlL C- j RT FI LING FE M; CR VE LTC P M 11T OR VcH LI C Q GENER AL R 1- 1 2 HOLL0 VAY ROLL BENEFIT p: ;1l T ; L S c LF- INS *NECESSARY EXPENDITURES SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING ACCOUNTS PAYABLE FEBRUARY 11,1985 (84 Expenses) PA CHECK RLGI ST R - 19t 4 C:TY �= MAPL 'W 0 v_y� ^� :T�� D =SC�Ir =� CHrC ti ^. rM� vy' /3� 1b5 17 r . n 8R ACKb LOJ TS CONTRACT FYW 042555 _1 1�.. ►, �C,rD SUBURB Iasi +LTG REFUND f r42 o.i7 ,, :/3�I�5 n n b.. - i ! 452•x.0 ST PAUL D: SPATCH USL :CATI _:42.,657 �1�'?= /�5 452.20 ARCHI TECTJRAL "LL f+ T D C .rJT. ,C . Y a L '' K -0 RILI Ht q FU ND 12 C , r 1 / 3 �a6.55 CASWr -LL 6._f)Ujl'"7NT S IF 5 5 * ' C^NC3RDIa aR M'.:" _L- rT X42 -? l 1 /3 `! 5 35 r. �' Fil_Q� LCFL* - I .- NTR! FYM �42u, :� �1l3/c7 .SL Li 4 ., r� v � 1 /3 /cj 12.5 :: M;A�cY JA1t! �CKFL R.FU �� 12.50 7 - % J3VO4CvIC-4 C ARR:= F.E'F L J s 7, r t — 1 /3i_. / F 5 12.5D J,JNEK AD".A ;Or' VL2 C? • J 179 rD IN_NS SE PV'C r 0�r 179.,^ 6 -, , �5 SaN;TaR ±Y '?OJJCTS CO F PL Tc SU � r 23 ,, R ;;1/3. /_5 �L2 6 7 5 D42z, 24 v1 /K''1 5 7.:v ^" SC NM I OT JJ L I- RAF �J'v:: _ 7 ij ,,.� u42.. 1/ z' / 5 12..31 U.LANI) HEL ;�,FL;'iJ _5 Ff Yo 03': MAOL' WOOD MAPLc R FUtiD 041 ?6 7♦573 .:b f 49 30 CL'A'Y ST:-' RUGS *Jb CLE:•;►* D 49. Z^ CLEAN ST,a RUrs aUG CLEA P�70 98.6 611. ^^ DALEY PAT Sr _CTi ^.Ni 522.6 0 OF r- JBLIC SFTY C o N '� Z ,, T i, ti A ,, 4 DUBL IC SFTY 0T C1 A? G= 562.36 55022 D'RECTl.R CF P ?CPERTY L L= 56o22 • 223*22 EAST COUNTY LINE FUZL _ 19x.4 f =Y JF MAPL- WC ^7 CHECK P.,EajST= R AMO'J�1T l:Hc.. K N' GT_ 9 61. 5 ARNAL AUT'3 S'RV RTp °S LA 42A6 :'1 /3 /k5 ARNALS ALT0 SF iV ;.;42 6.C? 1 /3C /95 133.10 u42 .1 /3 /p5 042 1 /3^ / Q 5 72. o- 94TT TTR;' �i HSc S�JPOL:ES 72.x.7 d L!42`"1 _1 /3 5 r T CT PY14. ?77 19 BlAQD OF 'WATE.R COMM T42 Q45 _ 1 /3^ / 275.45 r-'41 X45 _ 1 /? / 5 FYI" C42 ='45 _.Zl /k; C N TR CT Y / 3_ / Zt ' 61AR) OF wAT C'•jmm r a ^'vT 92 • ° �' r42 ► 4: 1 /3 :, ; J Pym x`44 45 B Of- RD 3F ig AT:*-i CjM;i C ^� :. �, JT T FYI 452 BIARD OF 4AT :r, CDMM 7 42 r4 : PYM �75•�� 8 IR3 OF WAT`K CiMu _1/3 �� oru 55.'4 BCARO 5F 44T -7R Comm CrNT:;cCT PYM 262.53 9JARD >3F «L AT ER CJM C.CtiTPACT FYy U-42 -'z - _ 1 /? �� 5 L 4 2 � ? J .. '� 17 L42 r3_5 J f t# tf tk C42 4_ n42f'4_ n4 4 3 1 / F 5 042EJ6 :.1 /3:x/95 7♦573 .:b f 49 30 CL'A'Y ST:-' RUGS *Jb CLE:•;►* D 49. Z^ CLEAN ST,a RUrs aUG CLEA P�70 98.6 611. ^^ DALEY PAT Sr _CTi ^.Ni 522.6 0 OF r- JBLIC SFTY C o N '� Z ,, T i, ti A ,, 4 DUBL IC SFTY 0T C1 A? G= 562.36 55022 D'RECTl.R CF P ?CPERTY L L= 56o22 • 223*22 EAST COUNTY LINE FUZL _ CHECK P.,EajST= R AMO'J�1T V ND9R I TEV DESCR' - TIO', 9 61. 5 ARNAL AUT'3 S'RV RTp °S 241.:.5 ARNALS ALT0 SF iV R"F ; 133.10 ARNALS AUT V 436.0 72. o- 94TT TTR;' �i HSc S�JPOL:ES 72.x.7 17,95 3 DF *4 AT_R C3MN r T CT PY14. ?77 19 BlAQD OF 'WATE.R COMM CONTRACT PYM 275.45 BnARO JF of aT: C;) CINTPAC. T FYI" X 55.31 8088) OF Wa Cimm C N TR CT Y 4?, 41 61AR) OF wAT C'•jmm r a ^'vT 92 • ° �' B*? 7F 41TER COMM C^NTRACT Pym 214.46 B Of- RD 3F ig AT:*-i CjM;i C ^� :. �, JT T FYI 452 BIARD OF 4AT :r, CDMM NTR CT PYM �75•�� 8 IR3 OF WAT`K CiMu C 4TR CT oru 55.'4 BCARO 5F 44T -7R Comm CrNT:;cCT PYM 262.53 9JARD >3F «L AT ER CJM C.CtiTPACT FYy 7♦573 .:b f 49 30 CL'A'Y ST:-' RUGS *Jb CLE:•;►* D 49. Z^ CLEAN ST,a RUrs aUG CLEA P�70 98.6 611. ^^ DALEY PAT Sr _CTi ^.Ni 522.6 0 OF r- JBLIC SFTY C o N '� Z ,, T i, ti A ,, 4 DUBL IC SFTY 0T C1 A? G= 562.36 55022 D'RECTl.R CF P ?CPERTY L L= 56o22 • 223*22 EAST COUNTY LINE FUZL _ PACY le 3 19� 4 C _'Y 3 M L=WCDJ C N`'' C K ` U.4Z >5 7 e4 5 ;42;�t, v4 2 .. `.4 2 : z J42 L1 5 D42 V1 4 ; 4 2 v'42 "7 r.42r - - 1x42 y 042�..9 L42 9 L 01 /Y) /R5 1 /37/c5 _1/3 _1 /3J /q5 X1/3'1 5 3�rr5 '.1 /3 ; /K5 ;_1/3 =/Q5 _ 1 13'- 5 1/3 - /Ro 5 �1 /3'? /i5 _ 1 /3 p �1 /3 /85 CgrCK REGIST =R AVIUNT VcNID °O' ITEM GOESCRIPTIJIj 223.2 146.25 GPAC: QUA`iE C C' ^4SJLT: '_ r';P 146.25 + 24.49 SPEW JA 1t T T ?tl V'L T? AIN NG 24.49 53.'6 INNERLINE C "INT= +CT cYM 53.76 74 INDE NDL #422 CUSTIJI CH;`' 55. ' I &JOEPENDE'4T #622 'LE CT _ON 1 3. - 1 ♦ ?1 • 2 5 LEIS RANNT vAN KLY T �. j`,1 Tr- CT �1►ti+l 1, 134. M3r'L -JOJD PcVIEW L ?ELS 34. 5 v , ' Y - . METRO L NS' ISER CE TI 5.� 6 43:* * 60 MTN "J MIN? C O S 4 3:.6.3 * - ?2 •.'0 M'lJ U" FUND 4TH QTR 72 ?. "^ 56.36 RAmS-Y COJNT Q_PA: � MA INT 3.335. q2 RAMS *Y COJNTY REP Cr R mA NT 33. , #9 RAMS'Y COJNTY Cc,rJTR CT FY4 11.32 RLMS =Y COJNTY A7 R wA:N� 39437..;9 Y r PA e'. 19.4 rI TY OF MA='L- WC"JD. CH`CK REG :S TEE F. C Mr;.K N C T= "MD JN� VrN�JC� iTEN �J_�LF'PT' C42 C5 .1 /3': /85 16.50 ST PAUL C" TY "-F ?EDµi w MA T"4T J4Z r5 A U42 ..1 / 3:" / 5 53. 75 ST DI UL C: T OF r AO I') MA : r,T S5 1 /3. / y5 203950 ST P-* UL CITY 0 p,0'3 Ma :N'T f.,42 r5'; -1/3 : 547, R0 ;T PO.UL Ci T Of A0 I MA :r 41 ^5 .1 !31- /�s 5 697. ST Pt UL PI TY 07 F AO i MA TI T U42 S5 r� L 1 / 3:j /8 5 123 * ST PAUL C1 T Y OF =• A PM D TO Ma I NT 1 /3,:/85 8 " 5 ST PA UL CITY 0r' F - M a � ^ -,. 1L R.3t, ES�a 1 � +► J42 5 = ? 1 /3, IRS 73.5 2 S. TAT�- OF 14'4 0 ~T CINT4 ACT Prm 7 3 . Z ► r,L T�? .,.' /3.. /u5 R4,,0 TEL:. -T: RMT�vA:. S C ati'TPaCT ?Yu 7 - 42 ?4? . 1 /3� l a 5 4Z..�0 T'L =• T��'� c �'?`� Ta.:.CT zYM .. 1 2 6 /3`.'/ 5 1 UO.'^ TKOA C "N T T PYm ;;4Z Tt:5 1 •23? .43 TK�A COt�T?aCT FY� 1 ,33 53 L42 J:) '�' _ 1 /3 35.� 0' UtiIF�R4S J`rL T =0 U,j FI °M r` 4L�;5 "1 I3. /r) 105.10 U"�IFRMc UtiLI�+ TAD U''vIrJRM C42U5.. ..1 /�_ / .5 Ana, 5 UNIFC -MS JNLIM: T =J Ut 'sIF��M_ ' :.1 I3o `I;� 173.'0 UNI F- MS J"l(LIMITr0 U IF `?MS 415 ' 5 t�tlr* 4 -242L -1/3 k5 3 51. ' U`1:V =RSAL MEO'Cal 1lSCti 1 /3_ /5 z ^.4 j U�:?V'KSAL 4ED:SAL OxYG�ti _ 71 . 7' �42 1/3 5 be17 V4 EIMTCK_ ASS')C StJFPL.Ec ra4Z V - :_ _ 1 /3- /fi5 8.1 7 VW E M ICK_ ASS SUaPL:cS 16.34 L42 K01 �1 /7 /?S 91.66 wtARN R S T J VALU SUPPLIES 42u ?.z :_ 1 /3; i b 5 3.9J �IAR11"'�,S Tau= VALU SL)PrL:EF L-42 6?'t 1 /3 5 13 * 5 9 VIRN :-kS T:) UE VALU- SUPPL_ r^ ;,42621 .1/3 :-/ 5 66.27 w - " RMrRS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES J4ZW ?4 1/3y185 21 e?? WARN"RS TRJ VALU SUPPLIES U42 W ?' .1/3:'/85 5504 WIRNERS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES piv Q .r CHECK REGjS 4 �"TY - r -,-� 3F M��L w __.. - V. NOOK I T M ufSCn1�' T -7 0 _ N -1 . J� TL . awoU 4 t a J42 1 _1/3`� �R `. 43. 1 WARN-RS T?UE. YALU Wt�RN -r�S T °�� YALU SUPPLIE' ' 3UPPL_ r s 2 .:1 /3r ��5 Si 2T 31 WARw'RS TRUE YA LU S'JPPLIE- t 4[ .► -. 1 1 /3�' / 5 .77 Z �+ WtRN -'RS T 7 UE VALU S UP P L _ �• T= UE VALU S'J ?PL. 2w 1/3 3.4$ yARNrRS TRUE V..L!.l SUPPL.ES /3 /F 5 45F,.2b ��qZ �E3cP•TtRC:� =Tw IwC �'J ?PL . - 642k5� Q ,. /3 t _ 3. b5� �' �I NF -LO i ITCH LL * w T:� CT ?YM z 5 . bn 121 XEnOK nUPL1CA r'^: - -� v�_ 4� 1 /3'. � .54 1 21 �(-ai1X . T •► DUpL_�.a �� C"� 5 .54 243. Lkl Z ?. . 7 /3 ' . /q5 54.55 -R Z ,. -, cc ;, C .- 4F �r� MF C� SU0aL:�� , r-� T S SJ L__ L42 27 14. 5 5 ,,: * t ► 21 v - 75 .9 9 n 31 TOTAL FU111 v =-N ER �L 5,W 51'.�6 F UND 13 TIT IL C.I. °. 54 -1 LLi►�JcFw t 17.Q5 ruNm 3b TOT�L Fuoc 3 � TOTAL J3-11 ST J 0q',r 2 77.3 9 1933.53 FUND 39 70TtL K4 -4 MCCL - LLB _ 277.45 7t 41 TOTAL FUN 7t K4 - 7 S�JU�.�C ��` 1 SS. 1 PUN^ 43 TOTAL 84 .9 TOUSLEY 4 G� K� 42 41 FUN! 44 TO TAL 64 TW- N • 92.9'? FUN o 71 TOTAL ��1 -2i W El AV 214946 FUND 72 TOT:,L A2•-13 LI'•wC'C 452 14 • FU'`1^ 7° TO ♦ ;L 8? -1 ' 725.78 r FUNO 8 TOTAL ST ='�L' N� GLEN 11.32 FUND 82 TOTAL 83 -:.1 FF ' 55 FUND 84 TOTAL 3 9 '4 ?62 I:Uk ?0 2 5 TOTAL 9�' TOT� L 83� 3 T - SEC =� •. S I. Sr' . 4 9 FUN'J' FUND 92 TOTAL _ PAY-�y BEN 1 7P 72p��0 1b2.a7 FUND 96 TOTAL 1� =H:CLE � ESL 31 TOTAL r ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - FEBRUARY 11 ,198 5 1985 CITY OF MAPLE -W000 CH K I,5. DATE . +. 042,.2 •• :1 /3r /8 t *a U42::D6 �)l /30/8 V42 /3 /R5 042 5 J42 1 /3 8 5 . 04291 j113::/A5 0421 ?5 1 /3'/85 r-421 5 _1/3 ^ /QS 042164 " 1 /3) / 8 5 042? :'5 r1/3J/8'5 X42 ?_ 042315 01/30/85 ^4 2359 1 /3) 185 042399 1/3')/85 A M0U .1 3'6.)0 376* 10 25. )0 15."^ 40 . "0 29050 29.50 36.4 R 36.4 3 72.6 175.�i t 1,,1 0 4•�C 1 ,104.33 r' 5.�., 35. -'0 2D n 12.36 12 ^.35 45.32 45.32 * 39. ?5 39.75 * P46 e '• / CHECK RESIST -P V :N00 OESCRIPTI.0; MINK TWINS T1CK_TS 4A TL RI FL: ASSN M MB_ RSH ' NATL RIFL: ASSN MEMB = .SHIP ROAORUNNcR SUPPL: rS A -1 9USIti =SS M4CHIN SUzPL I ES A -1 9U ZN--SS MArHlNE SUPPLIES C^RP3R AJE RISK MA, %G C tq TR 1 4CT . PYM SUOUI44N RATE RUTH m= M =KSt MEE4AN JAMS JAN CANINE ALLOT MTNN NA'TUi 4 LISTS m m bZ., RSAI Tp MTNN NATUTAUST:3 M= MB�RS'4IF f 6 T CARTS Ca SUPPLIES G00OYFAR AUTI SERV SUPPLIES NATUI AL SCIENCE SUPPLIES 0 e 1965 C',TY .)F M A PL W2 1' 3 CHECK REGTST R CHECK NO. DATE AMOUtir VENDOR ITEM UESCRTi =TiC 0415 54 ,,1 / 3' /85 5'�r. � ^ CASE PO4 EQUIL TPA IL-R J r ►.w • f 042 574 1 /art /85 4.50 MT-NN DOCUIENT CTR M'MB =RSHIP 4.50 1,4257: 1 /3�.�55 21- 'D STAC MFG )TST RE.PAj ± 14 AINT 04257: 1 /3.. /R5 161.43 STAC M =G GIST SUPPLI._S 374.43 0425-: - ;,1/3 =/85 BURLINGTO4 NORTHERN R =FUN * *flit t 042 6 ., : 1 /3 1 R 5 24.43 NORTRSTAR IH SUPPLTE 24.40 042739 1 /3r 185 25.?C' THCMALLA DAVID TRAVEL. TRAIti 042739 .3113)/R5 22. 2 THOMA'LLA DAVID TRAy�L TRA;tvI�; . 47.?2 042744 ,:113.:/35 109.Q2 GREEN 'NORM U :lIF) MS Z` 109.9 042 - /3) /P 5 23.:.40 ACC0JNTE 5 TEMP HELP 2313.4G t 042 e 1 X1/3018; 50.::0 9Rcy = 33N S�_AK_R FFE 5m . 7D 042c22 1/z 1.79 ~n 1JENS SEQVTC_ SUPFL'ES 041825 ''1 /3D/85 15.; =0 BUSCH DON TREAS N MBLPSHIP 15.x:'0 C j. C: r- i i r P T 1965 CITY 0r MAPLEW01D CHECK REGISTER CHECK N ^, D:,TE OUN'' VENDOR : T DESCRIPTIO 042e ?6 ,l /3G/85 7, DAHM" R'DP_RT REFU'i3 7 . '� O : • 042c27 U1 /3,x/85 22.5^ FISHER SCTENTIrIC SUPPLIES 22.50 04262 L1 /3io/85 18. D' F SUSTE REF`JN 1R # t C426?9 1 /3n /R5 12, ;4 GEN INO SJPPL.Y SUPPLIES 12.4 1 /3^ /85 18.31 ZtiDUSTRI A" CH="" LAP SU"PL'_ES 1R. 31 042:31 5 12.50 KOPELKE PIT ^FUND 12.50 042832 - 1/K/95 7 MUELLER LYLE RrFU'1J 7� U42 s 3 1 /3 /85 250 NAHP,O /OAK HRA M RS'V'P 25. '0 U42?<34 _ 1/30/R5 15. ` ROSFN LAR?Y SUPPLs 15 042 X35 : 1 /37 /95 3 SCNR =IER RICHARD ? -PUNJ 3 042 6 36 ", 1 /3 237. °TV SFA NUCLEAR COPP R.='P II. M 2370 Qn- J41 X1/3. /.3S 3.97. "'� SRECIAL S R. VTCE S PROG LcSSC�i 3 97 0. a 041 c7; ::1 /3 85 1 �'� �'? SVECIALTY TNSUL.ATORS CONTRACT =YM 1 'r' 77 • 042c3Q ,.1 /Y .185 7 SMTEJA LIVOA iEFU' +D 7 w t E42b4,, 1 /3'' /R5 7.-n WARREN MA?Y PEFUND 7. ^n t' 4,e 1 /3-3 /85 7��n WTEDL FM-!N-:" FEFUN� 7 rn G42a42 =1.1 /33/85 7•.-0 WTLCDX JU'i= PTFU 7.-7 f [1426 1 /3 R 5 53.43 WGJACK WE_O.ING SUPPLTCc 53.40 Pa�P y 1965 CITY JF MAPL =WE'D CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO D;,TE AMOUNT VENDO' ITEM DESC.nIPTIO�4 042A92 x'1 /32185 13 AUTJC 0% INDUSTRIES Rr - PAIr i 3,SD�• ;3 - c r42 al 5 ' 1 /3� /85 2 R .40 QATT= RY TIRE wtiSE PPL: 42E� Q 30/ 5 Y�6,8 BA ' R T2R WHSE. Su L.1 S n 2 G 5 1 /8 S , GATT= T F ;iNSE SUP. i. .S r1 / /RS GATT =RY 'RE W HS= SUPP =ES 04 5 c - = S OF L C4 '! 5 3_ a 5 eATT_ T -. WHS- .. 2R 5 �: /3� 5 BAT _RV TTRE' HSE PLIES 4 _ 7 C4ROLiNA 9IOL7vIC•"yL SUP PLTCS 04203.. 1/3 Q-5 25. 2 25. ?2 u42 C5 1 /3.185 9'1.50 CLUTCMgTRINSM SS10N SU °PLIES 91.5.0 04Z X55 �.'� /3" /�5 COPY DUPLICATI'�G JUPL:CAT_NG - :f1 /3� /FS 7.54 DOHEITY KATHLEEN MILEAGE U42 C61 '.54 42 E':'5 : .'� /3:.' /85 ^,'��?"."G EAST CIMM /FAM;LY ETR F:NAti ^IAL Si}�PO� C - 042rl 5 1 /3�/3 34.32 EDSO4 DAVID MIL'. 34.32 042 !:9 -1 30 5 225. ^�J EVANS BAR -dY Vrti ALLDUANCr- 225.�O. *- 042 G49 . 1 /3� 1P•50 GO °HER BEE PING Cl SUP PL IES 1 q.50 CHECK RE.GIS''- ? _ aMOUNT 1985 CITY OF MAPL EWOOD 4. J G. F. 0 o A :* 8 03 K f CHECK N^. 0:. TE f GREW JA =NET FF3 G SUPPLI- S 19097 042 G5 5 1/Y/85 5, ror-W J INiT r'QOG SUP" PLI * "S S * 37 G42.35 LA /30/85 46.?0 042 G5 -1 /3: /05 251.25 C42 �5 e L 1 / 3D /8 5 251.25 * 042G5 U1 /3/85 245.56 HARM3 GLISS SUPPL,_E� ?45.56 * C4ZH1 3 -1 /3:2185 55.''x' IIMC M_MBEPSH 13i *)6 J42 H1 6 .: 1 / 3'- / u 5 1 3 6 t u42;2 1/37/85 321.17 6495 042 :31 1 /3: /F5- 54.67 KNOX LUMP- SU PPLT�S 1 55.3 5- K4:)X LUMBER SUPPLIES 1 49."1 042 J351 /3�I$5 t KNOX LUMQ =q SUPPLI.� 71 , 7 fl '042K55 "1/3 129.33 * 042K55 ;;1 /31 /R5 9.23 )4ZK55 C1/3rl/R5 Q.2 3 * C'42K55 L1/3 1 5 1 5g. 7 i 2 G42K55 �1 /31/85 15 °."2 + 042 K5 5 01/30/85 042KSO 01/33/ U4201 :,1/31/Q5 CHECK RE.GIS''- ? _ aMOUNT VENJO? I TEM D_SCRZPT' _ 4. J G. F. 0 o A :* 8 03 K f 12 8 GREW JA =NET FF3 G SUPPLI- S 19097 GR EW UA NIET �R O G SU- PL.I'- c 5, ror-W J INiT r'QOG SUP" PLI * "S S * 37 Go E JANET PQ OG SUPF LI. S 46.?0 251.25 lJ:LE CO 251.25 * 245.56 HARM3 GLISS SUPPL,_E� ?45.56 * 55.''x' IIMC M_MBEPSH 13i *)6 INSTY- RRI�TS SUPPLIES 1 3 6 321 .3 7 JT M HA T CM S ALES S U °'l i ES 321.17 6495 KNOX LUMP.= R SUPCIL IES 54.67 KNOX LUMP- SU PPLT�S 1 55.3 5- K4:)X LUMBER SUPPLIES 1 49."1 KNOW LUM9_R SUPPLIF 64.67 KNOX LUMQ =q SUPPLI.� 71 , 7 fl KNOX LUM8 SUPPL i ES 129.33 * 9.23 K SUPPLIES Q.2 3 * 1 5g. 7 i 2 LAKELAYD = JRD SURPLTES 15 °."2 + �M0U.1T 35.0 35.D0 f 5 0 5 . n' 3 •� 1500" 1 50. I0 1 5.:.0 15.0 85. 0 57.89 113. 8 31 9 7 0 1 45.40 3. 15,91 56.40 3 ^. 7 'p •75 63.69 98. 46 Rt 5..1 9 3g.o0 23.30 390 9A 14.51 15.89 13.)0 596.24 19.50 33 *9 0 39.:; 0 1 ,933.10 359 .: i CHECK REGISTER VEND ^_R :' +EM D RrPTr - LANG RICHIRD SUPPL4. LS P;7TR0 aR;.l MGNT ASSN MEM9 =RHSTr MN 0 P= GIS"TRAR MN CRI ME 0 REVFNT:G.'J MEMP._kS4TP M"A M NnRTi ST 'AJL CITY 4y:)R.+'1T ? =NT:+L KIRT14JESTER A BELL TELE ?HOB: 0 4IRT- 1WEST =R N 19E5 CITY OP MAC PL;. W000 NORT4WEST R N Bt LL TELEPHONE NlRTHWEST:RN CHECK N39 D,, T= t 8 =LL TEL= Pi-40NE N1RT4WESTERN 042L2' "1/3 WTIWEST :R N BELL T'LEPHON E N'RT4WEST ^R N 042 e1 /30 /R'5 NORT14WEST N BELL T~L H0N N?RT-lWEST R N 04Z fv5-, r 1 /M /P 5 NI P.T- IWESTERN Br*LL TELEPHCN NlRT4WEST_R N B "LL T= L:.P6 O to' E. K1RT4WEST =R N 042 %o - 2 '':1 !3 5 NIRTiWESTER N BELL TELEpHOtiE NORTIWEST :RN U42Y95 '.1 /3 NORTHWEST -RN tf. *t t T.LPH3ti: NORTMWE'ST= RN 042Nk - .;,l/3 R5 NO RT-f VESTER N BELL TELE. PH0N NORT BELL TEL PHJN= NORTHWESTERN C42 ;5 _ •.,1 / 3 85 .NIRTNWEST_R N 042 % , 5 : _ 1 / Y- - /65 N I RT -1 WEST_R N 042 5 1 /3' 185 N'aRT4 WESTr R N 042 5 1/3J/F5 NORTP4WESTERN 9-42%5- 1 /30/� `_ 042 ".5: - L1/3 0 , /85 042 *;5': •::1 / 3r / 85 f142 5.: t 1J3 042 5 L1/3 042 N15 1 / 3j /85 042 N5 1/3:j/85 042%5_ X1/30/85 042x;5.. L1I37 /85 042 &:51_ 61 I30 /8 c C42%5 1 /3r' 1 F5 042 N5: C1/30/85 ( C42N5u L1/3U/85 042N5,_ E1/3G/85 U42N5.` 01/33/85 0 42N52 :.1/30185 C42 ,5C ,.1/3C/R5 042N5 t'1 /30/85 { 042 R5 113 /A5 �M0U.1T 35.0 35.D0 f 5 0 5 . n' 3 •� 1500" 1 50. I0 1 5.:.0 15.0 85. 0 57.89 113. 8 31 9 7 0 1 45.40 3. 15,91 56.40 3 ^. 7 'p •75 63.69 98. 46 Rt 5..1 9 3g.o0 23.30 390 9A 14.51 15.89 13.)0 596.24 19.50 33 *9 0 39.:; 0 1 ,933.10 359 .: i CHECK REGISTER VEND ^_R :' +EM D RrPTr - LANG RICHIRD SUPPL4. LS P;7TR0 aR;.l MGNT ASSN MEM9 =RHSTr MN 0 P= GIS"TRAR MN CRI ME 0 REVFNT:G.'J MEMP._kS4TP M"A M NnRTi ST 'AJL CITY 4y:)R.+'1T ? =NT:+L KIRT14JESTER A BELL TELE ?HOB: 0 4IRT- 1WEST =R N BELL TELE NORT4WEST R N Bt LL TELEPHONE NlRTHWEST:RN 8 T_ LEPH�NE NORTHWEST :RN 8 =LL TEL= Pi-40NE N1RT4WESTERN Br-LL T^LED 40NE WTIWEST :R N BELL T'LEPHON E N'RT4WEST ^R N BELL TEL^PH0 _ NORT14WEST N BELL T~L H0N N?RT-lWEST R N BrLL TEl; NI P.T- IWESTERN Br*LL TELEPHCN NlRT4WEST_R N B "LL T= L:.P6 O to' E. K1RT4WEST =R N E_LL TEL = P�-ON NIRTiWESTER N BELL TELEpHOtiE NORTIWEST :RN BELL TEL EPH0 %F NORTHWEST -RN SELL T.LPH3ti: NORTMWE'ST= RN BELL T = L= P+40'4 E NO RT-f VESTER N BELL TELE. PH0N NORT BELL TEL PHJN= NORTHWESTERN 8:'LL TEL: PHONE .NIRTNWEST_R N BELL LEPHON N I RT -1 WEST_R N B!-' LL ; - LEPHINE- N'aRT4 WESTr R N SFLL T U EPHON E NORTP4WESTERN BELL TEL - PHONE P4, e 19F 5 CITY OF MAFLEWCOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK N o 7:,TE a MOU"4' YENOG? : TEN OESCRIrT::. 042 ^,5 1 /12 /A 5 63,44 N7RT4WEST_R N BELL TELEPWON= N N5: L.1 /30/85 13,Q5 NJRT�IWEST.RN BELL TEL U 42 ";5" 01 /3'' /85 74.23 NORTHWESTERN BELL TIELEPHONE 042N5� �j1 /3r' /85 61 .3R NORTHWEST- SELL TELEPHON" 042 N5; %1 /3' /85 45.60 NORTKWEST =R h BELL TrLE.PyOti: M2K5 1 /30/85 51.54 NMRT BELL TELEPHON L142N5 D1 /3 0 f 85 103.D8 NO RTHWE S TE RN BELL TELEPHONE J42 N5 1 /3`3 / A 13.95 N!RTH WESTERN B 'Ll T EL EPH3'v E 042"15 �1 /37 f85 .103. 8 NORT- IWEST_RN BELL TEL: °HON; 042 N5 i;1 /30/ 15.20 NnRTIwEST: R N BELL TEL= PHQ;�E 042';5.: �1 /3�'/R5 51 954 NOQTyWFST:R N BELL TELEPHG f;42N5 . ;.1 /3 115., a5 NORT�IviEST BELL TELEPH0r�E 042 cs5 ' 1 /30 /R 5 49,68 NnQTHWEST:R N BELL T LEP ±OPT: 042 !;5 1 /31/85 2Q.1 0 NORTIWE'ST =R N BELL TEL_:PnC'�E 042%5. ;.1/3'.;/85 13. Q5 NIRTIWESTERN BELL TTL= pHGl 042N51 _1/Yw./8 5 0 13.5 NORTHWEST:RN BELL TEL_. L 042 N5:' .: /3 - 16.11 NORTH BELL TEL= P 1 142N , 5 , �1 /3::185 11 ,1 5 N'?RTiWrST�RN SELL TFLE ?HCtiE C42 R;5 11 /3>.: /85 89935 NORTIWESTER N BELL TEL ErHO114 042 %5'' ,.1 /3 '/85 67. NORTIWEST:.RN 8r'LL TrLEP"n -NE 042 N5-. -1 /3- / R 5 81 , u0 N ^ R N BELL T ELEPHONE 042k-5'� 1/K /85 13.95 N "RTIWEST.RN SELL TELzP+�O�� 042 P 51". 1 /3i / 85 12. 30 ?VORTIWESTER N isELL r :L EPHONE 5 9''0 °.51 r42':y5. :..1 /3 R5 NUTESOV La VER *1E TRA V .L TRAI %1I ,SC t,42F?Q - 1 /3:'*/85 15796 PEN4SYLVA "47A ?)TL F'JEL :11L 15 -• 06 042 r4! 61 /3 /85 4 - .?4 PLAQUES PLUS SUPPLIES 47.24 C42 P64 '.1137) /85 10, 0 PRETTNER JOSEPA TRAVEL TFAINItiC " +� U4209^ :;1 /3 ^/85 79.x^ RYCO SUPPLY CC SUPPLIES t U42 S' 5 - -1/30/85 312* J r S 6 T OFF; CE TABLE 312.'; J 1985 CITY OF MAPLE W" ^a CHECK REGISTER - CH N"?* E - OnTc M T a .pU'U EN 0 Y_ Q ITE D£SCRIP 0425) =.4 :.1 /3 /85 350. STEF =EN S C4N x14 R ETAT 35.20 f i 042T4L' 1 /3J185 11 *Q6 TAUBMAN D)USLAc M TLELGc .11 .96 t 042T61_ 3 292. TRUCK UTI4-ITIE'S MFG REPAIR MAINT VEH 292.96 t U4 , - y � . 1 /3.� 5 47.5 TWIN CITY FILTER SUPPL ES 4'.50 U42T91 x,1/3: /65 1.25 2 TWIN CITY JANITOR, SUPP L;c.S 12.25 C42U1 �1!? -, /8 5 16.7' UNIT_) ST?IES SUPPLIFS 16.77 t t *t�.► t 042V1 5 .8 � 1 /3.. /..� 30.55 VA LS a0D1 SHIP- L _ R= P,.►TR "a "NT 042 V1 5 .1 /1"; /85 651 5 VALS BODY SHOP R =PATS MA :NT 965. 042 V5: r _ 1 /3318 5 24.35 T E PPT T G V _ RTU_ _ N I N OFF:C: SL'FPLT "S - 24.35 042 w5.. 01 /3P X85 599.1 2 Y- BER- TRGSETH INC REPATQ MA TNT 599.12 042 Who U /33/85 4. �6 W41TE BEAq DnOGE REt�'Mip MATT 4. 042Y5`�� ;:1/3^/85 1,OJL�.��? Y0�'l!M 'DIL FUEL )IL U42Y5: 5 -�J YOCUM OIL F�1EL OIL 042Y5� 6 }4E�.90 Y)CU�M OIL FU:L OIL C. i_ r' 4 i- ll f 1985 CITY OF MAPLEWO"00 CHECK ti S. 00'%' TE 042 Y5.# rA /30 'R • # f 4 t 04224v Cl /30 /8 5 045A65 Cl /31/?5 (!451,3 _ ;.1 /31 /R5 0 4 5% 3 31 /a 5 ,t ,45 31 /a5 C45''. :. 1 /31 / 5 C45 N ;- � x. 1 131 /85 C45<<`.: 1 /31 /R5 045 1/31 /R5 C45`;:. ^ 1 /31 /F5 C45 1 /31 /R5 045r;F J 1 /31 /85 r45 f 1 /31 /85 N5 L1/31/Q5 C45e,u., 41 f31 /85 045 .1 /31./F 5 045f.�:, X1/31 1 F5 ^45'Nn- C1 /31 /F5 C45Vw -- r.'i f31 ♦F5 045New 1 /3 1 /85 045 %x.. 1/31/85 045N ". C1/31/F5 f`45 1 /33 f 88 5 �45�'t � 1 /31 /:.:5 C45 1 /31 / F 5 045%NPLi L1 f31 185 045,x.. ;1131 /85 045N? -, 1 /31 /85 045 ". 1/31/85 C45P: C1/31/85 045k. - ' 1131 /85 045!�' J 1 /31185 045 1 /31 /F5 04 5 N r'1 /31 /R5 045N L1/31./85 045r ;�ij "1 /31 /85 C45N6„ L 1 /31 / 85 045; 't .. C1 f31 /p5 A M OU N'r 6 18 56.64 56.64 + 255.x"0 255• -% + 53910 2,8^8 -.2J 2 # 130:1 1,33.5•JO 2.40 2.4 i 3.53 2.40 3.53 2,40 891.50 29755.2R 92.34 42.41 $8.43 8L'•JO 153.19 1300 92.44 13r.14 35.43 6.275.79 129. ^9 9�?.�8 16.)J 292.48 4,25 4.25 4.25 15.20 132.1 5- 4.25 56.93 13205 5.35 .CHECK REGISTER VZN007 ITEM DESCRIPTIO% YOCUM OIL FUEL OIL r ZIEGLER INC AQUAZ YME 4I DWEST L T %E SUP P .�S CH_M1CAL T� L .TS NORTH ST ' AUL CITY NORTH ST 3 AUL CIT N.S.P• N.S.P• N. S. 7 0 • N•c•p• N 0 sool • N o S e al • N.S. • NOS* 3 • N.S.F. N•S.°• N . S.' • N 31 • N•S.P• N•S.p• N.S.P• N.S•P • N•S•P. N•S.;P• N•S.v • N•S•P• N.S.P. N.S•p• N•S.a. N.S.'• N• S.P • N.S.P• No S• P�• N•S.P• N.S.° • N.S•P. N•S.p • N• S.'. N.S.D. N.S.P. UTILITIES UTI LI T I LS UTILITIES UTI LITIE UTI LI TIE UTI Li TIE`' UTI LI TIE UTILITI."'- UTILITIES UTI LITIL' UTI LIT 'AT 6r:" UTI LITIE UTI LI TIE: ` UT: LI TI -` UTILITIES UTI L� TI;: UTI LI TIC UTILITIES UTI L1 TIES UTI Li TIC UT UTI LI TI UTILI'TILES UTILITIES UTI LI TIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTI Li TIE S UTILI UTILITIES UTILITIES UTI Li TIE S UTI LI T I L S UTI LI TI _ c UTILITIES UTILITIES �A c e lU i 1955 CITY 3F MAPLEWO-:)O CHECK REGISTER t CHECK too. DATE AMOUNT V: NDO? ITE 0cQ"CFiP7:o ( C45r:3 -; 1 /31 /A5 6.2� N.S.P. UTILITIES Q45h��.1/31/RS 354,J2 N.S.'. UTILITIES 045 ^_ 1 /31 /85 361 . R6 N.S.Q. UTIL:TIES ( C45ti�1 Q1 /85 25.11 ni.S.A. UTZLTTI-rS 04 5 k So C1 /31 /R5 4.25 N.S.PIS UTILITIES ^45 C.1 /31 /85, 4.25 N.S.°• U TILITIES 045N' 01/31 /R5 6 *20 N.S.P. UTILITIES - G45110 C1 /31 /85 294.- b N.S.P. UTILITIES _ 045% L 1 /31 /85 2or , % 3 N.S. ?. UTILITIES C45N 31 185 1 27.9r' N•S. UTILITIES 045 ,, , , ^, �1 /31 /F5 132.1 5 N*S.°• UTILITIES C45 r-1 /31 /85 574. 0 6 N.S.P. UTILITIES 04 5%, 1/31 /85 595. N.S.P. UTILITIES 045 t� �.. 1 /31 /R5 39509 N.S.'. UTI LI TIE S - U4S`�� - 1 /31 /a5 9 4._. >2 y. S. � - UTILITIj -ES t ^45 ?: a.. r1 /31 /R5 185.29 N.S.P. UTI LIP TIE C4 5 "y _ 1 /31./85 9 .52 N. S.��. UTI LiTI� = _ '145 Ni; 1 /31 /R5 315.26 N.S.'. UTILITIES 045N ;.71 /31 /R5 113.77 UTILITI =,z "� ' r4 5 r :�v r °1 /31 /,R5 94. N.S.P. UTILITIES C451':.° ''1 /31 /Rc 15 UTiLITIE^ ^45i. r 1 /31 1 235.64 N.S.'• UTILITIEc C45% 1/31/85 166.22 N.S.'. UTILITIES V45�. K_ :: 1 /31 /RS 1 - N•S.F. UTILITIES C45N %- . ;.1 / 73 N.S.?• UTILITIES 18.417.37 t 56,574,45 F UND G1 TOTAL GENERAL 1,F65.45 FUND 03 TOTAL HYDRA CuVA v� 1 ♦ 11 TOTAL DARK DEVELOP Y 3,643.76 FUyO 2 TOTAL G 0 QcFU%CG R"% ` 1 9 415.94 FUND 9': TOTAL S +NIT!RV SEW =:� 21 ,223.54 FUND 96 TOT-#L VEH:CI.E & EOi�._? 85.7931.1 5 T 'INDICATES ITEMS FINANCED BY RECREATIONAL FEES CITY OF MA PILE WOOD MA.YROLL-CH *CKS, REGISTER CYCLE 6101 ClhECK DATE 01 -25 -85 PERIOD ENDING 01 - -85 PAGE 1 DE -NO L -y'' EM°L)Y = 4AMh CHECK- N n AMOUNt CLEARED...-._._._ _.......- .v_.._._..__..____ _._. : (03.2 48436 REHM LOIS N 0122.00LC1 476.29 t � z a r n,0 2 206242018 EVANS BARRY R 0122.00002 1 X292,72 �•s 303.2 1 0769.01 +► e $ - 0010 4 7 366 447 4 012 2 00 ;;'' 3 . _102 65 JAHN DAVID J - . s � a 3010 4 739331 47 JOHNSO4 GREGORY R 01 22 -00004 0000 t x 1 ;< .9 J01D 469586523 SlJAN304-Jl. LYLE E 3122 -00005 511091 t 0010 614.56 t 12 ti .13. 3012 357343166 CUDE LARRY J 0122 -00006 1 83.74 t ' U017 470520124 D OHE I T Y KATHLEEN M 01 2 2 - GO 7 114 t 301 2 4 71 433908 Z 'R HER JOINN L 3122.000 ^8 109.45 t I J312 408.04 __..__._.11021 46'9531378 FAUST DANI F 0122 00009 10089.10 t 1 i �;10 0021 469743719 MEYER NANCY E 0122 -00010 0 *00 t x ) + �Z 002 19 089. 10 i 23 3 124 x022 469233614 NA GE4 ARLINE J 0122 -00011 495.64 t ) 1•, 1�. { �22 . 390444446 MATHcYS aLANA K 0122 - 0(}012 486.98 t 1 i3 0022 0022 476734432 MOELLER MARGARET A 0122-40013 592.89 4 7 0 022 N DEL ORES 01 2..0 475.92 � .._.�'. T 3 3 2 ? +S S _011 I G A l 0 0 E S . A 2 _ ... 0.� � � �.. .. 0022 29051.43 i 30 4 X31 0031 4713221 AURELIUS LUCILLE E '3122.00015 857.90 t 4 i - 14 3? I 4 0 0 3 1 ... _ _..._..._. __. __. _..... _ _ _ 8 5 7 * 9 0 3� JJ33 477288389 GREE4 PHYLLIS C 0122 - 00016 624.47 sue, 00,33 472244994 HENSLEY PATRICIA A 1122m00,217 283,65 t I OU3 3 4 76620 547 KELS"Y CONNIE L 0122-@00018 332.73 t I 30-33 476269815 SCHA)T JEANNE L 0122 -00019 221o82 t � 0033 468364435 ETOR LORRAI NE S 0122 -00020 440.28 t I I - ►t JU3 3 1 X902.95 • ,� j: 013 4 4F4091529 ST OTT L_ MY:: R EDITH G 0122 -00021 O.OG 1 X 1 �A41 0 U 3 4 t ;T IJ41 468461 71 7 COLLINS KENNETH V 0122- CO-122 1 X78.78 t 1 i¢ 148 'JU41 417369263 MA CAROL F 0122- 07073 338.47 149 JJ41 475323183 NE LSO'V Rr18ERT D 012 2 67909 JP41 411 227636 OMAT -11 JOY E 0122 -00025 395.27 t f - 16 OU41 471532356 RICHIE CAROLE L 01 22- a0f'26 371.67 J041 469602934 SVE NOS EN JOANNE M 0122 -00027 572.93 t 1 h . '5 3 7 154 2 9 466.51 7 >; 7 CITY OF MAPiL�.WOOD OAYROLL CHECKS 1EGISTER CYCLE 83 01 CHECK DATE U1 -25.85 PERIOD ENDING G1 -1 8a85 PAGE 2 - Dco.t -NO E4 rL -wN0 c*Mc VAM CHECK - NO AM.1UNT CLEAR% 4 774 81 364 01 2 2 00 028 61 , 54 3 _ J J 4 2 A R N O L 0 DAVID V I D L - d -I 13042 - 471402115 ATCMISON DOWN H 0122 - 0002 769.27 !f 00.42 4 76721 577 8ANI K JOIN J 0122- 00030 649.69 t I 11 d 0042 47;31741 BERG 01Y JOSEPH A 0122 -00031 513.99 r 7 73.4? .472 721660 BOHL JOHN C 0122-00032 525.51 ° 0C42 469689867 BOWMAN RICK A 0 2m000 33. 704.88 t ) .11 g # J:: 42 46P451930 CLAUSO4 DALE K 012 2 -00034 275o74 JJ42 476446119 DREG_R RICHAPO C . ' It 12 0 3 5 847.92 t ) 14� " 9042 47!2674.87 GREEN NORMAN L 0122 -00036 714.93 t ) I.n q 3 e 1042 3 2243565 MAGEV T►�OMaS L 0122 O�JC_ 7 0.00 t X ) 11 :7042 46956851 bALy;G KEVIN R 0122 -00038 671 t ) � UO.42 4 73634916 HERB MICHAEL J X01 22 - 00039 208.55 0042 472222231 _ KORTJS DONALD V 0122 -0.0 _....__. 00 1 20 3042 4 71 563591 Q LANG RICHAR J 0122 -OOC41 632.29 3042 476401388 LEE ROGER w 0122 -00042 712.62 t ) �2 � J04 469181347 _ _ MC N1LTr .JOHN J 0122 -00043 0000 t X � _ i A JJ42 474607686 MEERANo JR JAMES E 0122 -OCC44 747.73 t �) 'z, J042 469442063 MOES�WTER RICHARD M 0122- 00.045 296.96 00.42 475340990 MOR,LLI• RAYMOND J 0122- 00046_ 824, 38 ~ JU42 46 PELTIER+ PILL IAM F' 0122 -00047 711,92 t ) 2a J.J42 4T1564R31 RYAN MICHAEL P 0122 -OOC48 750.05 t ) 311 O U 4?. 470520457 S K A L M A N DONALD w 012 2 -O 0714 9 _ ... 202. JJ42 473548226 STAFVE GREGJRY L 0122 - 000150 771.46 33 0042 471721204 STEF=EN SCOTT L 0122 -00051 253.30 z J J 4 2 4 1 3 2 51 _.�. S T I L L VERNON _... T 012 t 0042 ��471629204 STOCKT94 DERRELL T C122 -00053 721.24 t ) ?fl OU42 471632052 TH044LLA DAVID J 0122 -00054 615.68 t ) 3 3 91 50 0042 475363333 WTLLT DUANE j 0122 -00355 536 0042. 474263130 ZAPP1. JOSEP14 A 01 22- ►00056 773.21 t ) 41 42 33 3 � . ___.. _ .... _... _ ... _._....__..r..__...._ 1 � � 4 9.3.41- _ * ..�..._ - 4,d 114 45 45 3043 475548434 BECK RONALD D 0122 -00057 326.87 t ) 4lt. 47 JJ43 469441789 GRAF DAVID M ^122- 00058 570.60 :704 3 469820466 HEINZ STEPHEN J X7122 -00059 840.31 t ) `' 'R JU43 3 92 P63J09 KARTS FLINT . 0 01 22 -OOC60 201.59 004 3 473567791 MELAN9" R JON A 0122 -00061 83 9. . 10 OU43 468363918 NELS)4 CAROL M 0122 -00062 957.33 �Q 7043 4T15J4316 RAISKAZOFF DALE E 0122 -OOC63 764.24 12 � JU43 474426'71 VORW =PK ROBERT E 0122.00064 32003 ) 7043 469502201 YOUN3REN JAMES G 0122 -00065 735.81 t' X043 4 0045 4 71 431 FTS EMfiEA T9 N JAMES M 3122-00066 73601 t ) 03 1 0045 472242227 SC H AJT ALFRED C 0122 00067 27 70 t f tea iF•w r 1 0045 1 ,016.51 S2 1146 468431 R99 CAWA4ES ANTHONY G 0122 -00068 145.43 9 046 417627236 FLAUaHER JAMEE L 0122.00069 472.34 D4_. _ ..... _........._ . ds '2 e �74 T7 77T. 77:7. CITY OF MAPILEWOOD PAYRJLL- CHICKS I: G?STER CYCLE B301 CMECK DATE 01 -25 -85 PERIOD ENDING 01 -1 8.85 PAGE 3 t DE'cl T - NO cMDL - Nl E4PL3YEIE NAME CHECK - Nn AMOUNT CLEARED z J3.46 176T 98T3 MADELL RAYMOND M 0122- 00070 460.12 3, 0046 4r 38J70 MARTIN SHAWN M 0122 - 00`71 456974 13.46 472365919 NELS]V KAREN A 0122 -00072 464, 63 a 334 6 469600183 R A BI NE J ANE T L 0122 -00073 460.12 t ) e U J46 477 327 STANNKE JULIE A 01 22 -OOC74 367.4$ 3046 2 X826.86 * �„ . � Ii eI 4 - - AARTA MARIE L 7122 -00075 249.37 t ) 1 41 3351 473566972 HAIDER KENNETH G 0122 -OC ^76 39.22 J351 5m4483174 WEGWERT4 JUDITH A 0122 -00077 367.41 3.051 656.00 = 9352 496308314 CASS WILLIAM C 0122 -00078 681.89 t ) � z,; 17 3 052 471526254 FREBEQG RONALD L 0122 -0G ^79 377.07 t ) 1.1 C2 544037 - 9 le i ; a 0 5 2 .. 5 � 2 5 4 4 J 3 7 H _ L_ Y R ONALD A LO J 012 2 00 08 0_ 6 2 .2 3 - .�g� JOS 2 471501241 KANE MTCNAEL R 0122 -00081 463.12 33.52 468363473 KLAUS IV6 HENR F 0122 -00082 530.29 t ) 0052 475601431 _ LUTZ DAVID P 0122w00183 508 Uzi _ 47163054 MEYER GERALD Y 0122 -00084 _ 505.21 , Z3 0052 4PS904500 OSWAL•D ERICK D 0122 -00085 0.00 t X . ►+ _ 4 6 6675 5 P. E DSEPH 8 01 2 2 -00086 880.12 I J 3 5 2 81 R .. T T N _ R J .. ._.. _ °j 0052 47224145 ►- REINE PTI EDWARD A 0122 -00 ^87 689 zG, 0052 471346224 TEVLINvJR HARRY J 0122 -00088 665.44 9177 A PPA JAMES 0122 -00089 0000 t X ) ! � 0052 47553 Z J M �zQ 005 2 59929 * � 3� 1 Af i � 31 30,53 472683970 AHL•JP* RAY C 0122 - 07090 832.87 >'F 0053 4724RIJ10 ELIAS JAMES 6 0122 -00091 689.87 t � a, 7 M a = N 312 2.00 09 2 62 5.94 ]0.53 16 2461 09 Gt IS�LER W LT_R 4 � 0053 531.464671 6ESSELE JAMES - T 0122-0 781 .27 ) 0053 475441 688 PECK DENNIS L 012 2-O 0 C94 581.87 t ) Q< JU53 472662522 PRI = 8= WILLIAM 0122 -00095 495.49 t ) _ _....__ 4f 0053 . 4.00 T. 31 t � 3054 4 7 3 6 B 3 77 5 L OFGR E SN J QH N- R 0122-00094 12 2 -00 096 . 4 03 . 68 �. ya .s; lyr. 905K 471562563 BRE HE` IM ROGER W 0122 -00 397 551.47 9058 411602582 EDSON DAVID 8 0122 -09093 668.08 r ,_ _ ._ .._w __.. .�. .�_ _...._ •...... _ ...... J C S is �4 7 J 5 41 590 M UL W E E GEORGE 11 J 12 Z - O Gr' 9 9 510s2? JC5F 471531314 NADEAU EDWARD A 01 22.0010fl 611 .41 f481 )056 46�i361720 NUTESON LAVERNE S 0122 -00101 561.44 t ) 00.58 411365993 OWEN GERALD C 3122 -00102 599.38 ti E 305 3 2.0s �5 00.59 476249760 MACD34AL -D JOHN E 0122. 000103 528.66 "l 7-4 r »� CITY JF MA PALE WOOD PAYROLL-CHECKS 1cGISIER CYCLE 13301 CHECK DAT 01 -Z5 -85 PERIOD ENDING 01.18 -85 PAGE 4 OF PT• NO FMPL - N! EMPL)VE! 'JAME � f 5 9 475501000 MU VA N- Y 1 .. 70 L 141 '»5 9 e J`J61 477331366 BREP44ER T'S. DENNI� 0061 46,R341993 KRUM'M_ L e JJ61 4 73263 389 ODEG4 RD 468 261 ST APLE 3 to �I1 U061 Oi LOTS 12 5122 -0010-5 309964 t ' _ 1062 469821909 13 EE8_ 01 22- POO116 161.82 7052 474928762 BRENVER. ' '' �_,._......•...._ . - _ _ _ _.�__ _.. _. _. -..._ w__. _.. _ 3.0.6.2.. .. 47144721 - - -- ._ 6 U R K :'e! JJ62 4718J3317 CARLSON ! 3062 47463 $1 82 GERMAiT l - JQ6 . 2 4 _... GUST ND 13.62 502544121 MELEY ►''"' 9962 468584797 HO PKINS ' J06 469744593 HOSCHKA ?2 3.'21,62 473969784 HUNTER 0122 -00110 0000 3,362 471 74831 3 LI844 PDT as MYLE S J062 473503915 LI NO3RFF _..L._.___.� .... _..._._. -..... ._ _:__.__.. 0062 ,. 473565506 MA RUSKA= D 30.62 444444444 NF: AL 016? 4743119128 R A SCIOC E A _. J.062 _ .... 477646662 SANDOUIST 0062 473660i135 STARK J 00.62 475934189 TOwNLE� �" 0062 417981931 TOMNLE Y ►1 . -' 0362 475745266 WARD 3062 39816.4397. YUKEI .9 12 2 - 00116 0000 t x) 3.0-62 JA - _.. E i� 3063 5 ^1 884242 AALSAAR D UU63 47094 911'5 ANDERSON X _......�._. - 00 6 3 _..4 . -7 82 3.19? QARTMOLMY 0063 4T2 HEAM4N 1a' 1363 46Q988277 BESETH ) 9 ^5 3 27048 3T9T BLACK .° J.3 6.3 469844634 80EV: R 1.44 7x.6 3 472 362: 15 B IRA S N 0 12 2- 00 1 21 33.63 47'962448 BRYAVT JU63 474442474 HUNK:- 17{ 0.00 00.6 3 4 Y692 4615 CA SSE DA.Y �"'�_.. ____..... _.._ _. .. 0 J.63 4f3654976 CASS=DAY 40 i 306 3 471935169 COLLINS "5(;: J0.63 469441 33 p CE MARS " ) 10!6 3 4 7482921 9 ... DIEBEL �sz 135.47 J-3. 47 4 931 9 22 O I A D E R M A N . � MICHAEL .. _ 9963 4 76 721 245 DOUGITY 55 see �7 C4ECK- NO AMOUNT* CLEARE.Q.. _. T'S. DENNI� M ^12 2 -00 104 716.67 t )? ,.� 1 245.33 + Oi LOTS J 5122 -0010-5 309964 t � ._..._.._ _ A BARBAPA A 01 22- POO116 161.82 ROBERT 0 .912 2 -00107 19011005 t ) ! P AUL I NE 012 2.137.65 JOMN J 012 2 -00109 2 78, 28 JAY A 0122 -00110 0000 t x ) , ►�' MYLE S R 012 2- 00111 .. _. 68.E 8 2_ _..L._.___.� _ i z ° x TIMOTHY D 0122 -00112 299.68 t ) I DAVID A 0122 -00113 530.84 M C _ L V I N J 012 2 114 _ .9 86 ? .i R OLA ND 8 '122o-00115 64.47 THOMAS C .9 12 2 - 00116 0000 t x) JA - _.. E 0122 - 001.11• T ON Y n122. 00118 105.74 3 .., THOMAS 0 0122 -00119 0.00 t x ) - � 3, DENNIS P 0122.00120 669.62 �"_...-.._.`__._ t ....__..__ ) _ ..._.�- MA ..� A 0 12 2- 00 1 21 696.00 TODD W ?122.00122 0.00 ( x ) 3. A LBERT F D 12 2 - 0 012 3 . _ �... _ . _. 0 . THOMAS 1 0122 -00124 0000 t x ) 37, RICHARD E 0122 -00125 135.47 t ) 3y MICHAEL .. _ .. F . 012 2 -00 126 •_ _... _�.. 0 ..0 0 ..._. _a... X ._� 4�. PATRICK 1 0122 -00127 0.00 t x ) i41 i 41 TROY G 012 2spOO 128 0000 t x ) WA TER A 0122 -00129 . 53 OS 4 4 !,t' 4 f 4$l 477 - ROSS A 0122-00130 0.00 t x ) CHRISTINE M 01122 -00131 0000 t x ) � J OD Y M 012 2-00 132 .. ... ___..�t. .0 * wArNE L 0122-00133 35.57 RONALD L 0122-00134 0.00 t x) '�- WILLIAM j 0122 -00135 0.00 t x ) ROBERT J �J 1 2 2- O O 1.3 6 1 11. 7 T� DONNA F 012 2.001 37 0.00 [ x )�« ROBERT D 9122 - 00138 0�Q0... t-�_�_�. RICHARD N 012 2.00 139 106.95 ) a? ELIZABETH J 0122-00140 0000 t x) F .� M A R Y K 0122-00141 3 6 * O G ( .. �.._ _...__ _._ _ _ _ ._ , . 1 g ° STEVEN A 0122-00142 0001 c x ) Ids SANDRA L .9122 -00143 0000 t x ) j� J= R R Y D 012 2 - 0 014 4 ... 0000 JAN IN_ M 2 2 -00 145 0.00 t x LINDA R 0122 -00146 0000 t x ) �� CITY o f M.:P - We lC �a YR� LL•CN� CK3 t GISTER CYCLE BO 01 CHECK DATE 0125 -85 PER�00 ENDING 01 -1 8 -85 PAGE 5 +T - NO C -Nf ENPLJYE'_ NAM= CHECK -NO AMOUNT CLEARED 2 JJ6 3 4 7693153 a 0� AKE HARHARA J 0122400C 0.00 ( x ) 2 3 3 7063 46994ga45 F 4 LT= ISEK JAMES E 0122-00148 106.44 4 ) a! 3263 .472921 J37 F 1SCN SUSAN M 0122 0.00 t X I 5 3363 473925557 F) WL MARY K 0122 -00150 0.00 ( x ) a e ]063 47193PI35 GALBRAITH CHRIS 1122- 00151 0.00 t x ) a ) 0-6 3 4 b `) 9 8 3 62 M S R AF M I C M A * L n 12 2.0 015 2 O.OQ �_.. (.. X • 3063 502825654 NA MM DEADRA M 0122 -00153 0.00 t X ) in' A 3363 _ . 475+326712 HARa.R JAMES 0122 -00154 _ ...._. 0.00 t X ) _ -_ ',2 to 1063 4 7484791 1 H EIMEPL C 04 R0L 0122 -00155 0000.`_.._ tx 13 +_� 13,63 476686096 Hc.R8ER KAR IN J 0122 - 00156 0.00 t x ) „ � '+'! 0063 4 73908 W)LLI NGSWURTH LISA 0122-00015 7 0.00 t X ) 6 J J 6 3 4 603 98215 0 H 4LT4 N TAMMY J 012 2 -0015 8 0.00 -_ � t X) __ _�__. _. �___ ; 41 '4j 005 3 473725137 HUNT JACK 012 2 159 0000 t X ) t 8! � ►`+ 10.63 y Y 47.1 03 a114 3 JOHNSO4 JOSEPH A 0122-00160 0.00 ( X ) 201 ,6 3063 4 698 J 610 0 JOHNS ON TERE SA L 012 2`00161 O.OD t X ) 7063 473922847 JOHNSOV TROY M J122 - 00162 207.63 t ) 221 t -1063 469862099 KANE KAREN '0122 - 0 0.00. 2d 3063 4 79 68054P KIELSA KAR I .1 012 2 -00164 0000 � � X ) ` ,25, 0063 476743753 KLASSE N SUSAN 0122.00165 0.00 t X '1 JJ63 4 747439 5 1 KOR TUS JAMES M 01 22-00166 0 r, _ - 33.63 468984 � KRUM4EL BECKY J 012 2 -00 167 0 +00 `.__ =� 7 1 !63 4 72 45 4219 LF CLAI R MARY L 0122 -00168 0.00 t X M ' 7J63 472883498 LO =FrL5R CAROL J 012 2 -00 169 _ 0000 t . x 3 .4 003 3 4 73 269 324 MAC DONALD ELAINE E 0122-00170 0000 t x ) 31 3 3'; 03.63 4T6923936 MAGILL JOSEPH M 0122 -00171 109.96 t ) ' ° !� 3'' ...�_._. _._ 473709729 ... M AHRE MIC A 0122 __..- .._.... �._._._..:._� X ]063 410926933 M= S SIN KATHLEEN M 0122 -00173 0.00 t x ) �' �y 00.53 474955150 MI HE. ICti CI401 L 0122 -00174 0.00 ( x ) 38ll . JJ63 469593337 1 41SK4 JANET A 0122 -00175 0.01 ( x ) .,t U063 474745123 NOESEN CRISTIN A 0122 -00176 0.00 t x j.__ IA, 32 JU6 3 4 73 565927 OLSOV ROBE RTA J 012 2 -00177 0.00 t X. ) I :3 3063 472808159 PADGET IE 0 0122 - 00178 0000 x ) i4 9063 46984910 5 PEARSOM LE SL I= A 01 22- 00179 _ 0.00 .... J0.63 472941928 PELTIER MICHAEL R X3122 - 00180 0.00 ( X 1063 x.69827763 RADA MICHAEL. F 0122-&00 181 0.00 - ( x 1 - ,,,! 30,63 469900639 ROH'1TS PAUL 1 0122 -00182 303.88 24 SETTLES GERALD 0122 -00183 0.00 t X ) '" 00,63 _ 48016/51 R SWELOON LEO B 912 2-wOO 184 4 X _ 0063 __ 396674919 S INNI GEQ SARAH J 012 2- 011 185 _ - .0.00 0.00 ` _.__. t x ` 70.63 477859167 3PANV3%'UER DAWN M 3122 -00186 0.00 ( x `' 9 0 63 469945370 SPAN48AJER EVA C 0122 -00187 0.00 ( X 70.63 469742645 SPAN N9a:UER KATHLEEN G 0122- 00188 0.00 t x ° 0063 JJ.b3 474345116 4b9965435 SPANVAAJE� S�ANVRAUER MA RTIN SUSAN J L 0122 - 00189 01 22 010190 0.00 0.00 t X x ,6 7 063 477920179 STRAJS 4 RA L U J ?12 2 - 0019 1 0.00 t X ) J9 5 3 4 76 9511 8 6 S ULL I VAN JULIE 712 2. 00'192 0.00 t x) ` 82 � i fA ie 1 106.3 '1 .471 923921 SZUR * : K JOANN M 0122 --09 193 0003 ( X ) ! 9,5 3 4 1162 6422 T A U3 4 A V DOUGLAS J '312 2 -00194 610.42 'i 0063 473963203 WALLACE JON T C122 -00195 212.29 JOS 3 3 9632 4245 WA RD ROY G 01 2 2 - 1.96 289.82 t 1 lj g1 0063 477740911 W�:B =Z RICHARD J '122- 00197 114.00 t ) '`' '3 u063 476.927674 WTE'CK THOMAS J x,122 -00198 92.00 t ) ,, fl �-7 174 y � CITY uF MAP►LEWOJ0 PAYROLL- CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8001 CHECK GATE 1111 -25 -85 PERIOD ENOING 01- 18.85 PAGE 6 . CME.C K- Nrl WILLIAM A 0122- 00199 J4 NE T M 0.122-00200 JU3 I T4 A w122-00201 CHRISTINE U122- 00202 JU M 01 2 2 -00 20 3 NAN� Y J 0122-00204 GEOFFREY W 0122 -00205 AM CL EAREQ _..... 0000 t X ) 1 4 2.336.73 6' 7 556 261.15 ) ss 305.62 t ) -- 1,123.21.. 13� 3 6 3.57 a 00 t X ) 840.14 t ) 1 9203.71 .* - - - -- THOMAS Dc'DT -NO EM'L -NO E4PLOYEE NA ME �2:`• �f IJ,63 474636610 ZAHN la 7063 2` le 7 0 S 4 1 5144 G R E W MARJ OR IE 33,64 411384624 HURSVELL p 8 0064 474542163 SOUTTEPo 816 5 10.64 '? __n71 387443993 CHLERFC'K ' 11.71 475592495 MISK'L� �' 4 ` 00.71 470540551 0LSON i»I lei ROBERT 'e 0071 5 ?9.45 31 '8L_. 1172 4 T9 KSTR a ND __.�_... UQl2 w 4756JS505 _.E JOHNSON 64 NORMAN � 0073 476090677 OSTROM 24 0013 4 w' GA R Y 2e, c 012 2 -0 0 212 30 2.09 t 21 46813 J 28 29 01014 387520"776 WENGER MARYLEE 31 0122 -00214 301.73 X? COUNT 0021x.. 33 GR4 N0 TOTAL ' 4 0001 477058088 ANDERSON 0001 485621 31 R BASTIAN 1 9 37 3.06 GREAV J ID.3.1 .4 471369335. MAIJA. '38; 000.1 477056134 WASILUK gaol . _ �__._.._....__ - - -- - _-- -....� 0.� _� ___- - .__.__•-- .._..__ . ._.__..... _ .. _..._._... _ _.... .. . 4�� M 0042 392240565 HAGEN '� _ c0 u y L : 21 5 ° 3 _ 0045 472242227 SCHADT _. , k4 ; 1 t GRAND TOTAL 1 LA �47 ,4 EA IP.A - Oil i 53 �l51 loss -i6 �72i 41 sj . CME.C K- Nrl WILLIAM A 0122- 00199 J4 NE T M 0.122-00200 JU3 I T4 A w122-00201 CHRISTINE U122- 00202 JU M 01 2 2 -00 20 3 NAN� Y J 0122-00204 GEOFFREY W 0122 -00205 AM CL EAREQ _..... 0000 t X ) 1 4 2.336.73 6' 7 556 261.15 ) ss 305.62 t ) -- 1,123.21.. 13� 3 6 3.57 a 00 t X ) 840.14 t ) 1 9203.71 .* - - - -- THOMAS G 3122-00206 6250 �2:`• RA:NDALL L 0122 -00207 569.65 t 2` MARJ OR IE 0122 -00 208 816.75 t ) 816 5 LA W REN CE _ — . 012 2 - 20.9 _._ .. _ QQ .__� :± lei ROBERT i 012 2 -00 210 5 ?9.45 31 31 64 NORMAN 6 0122 -00 211 1 50. CO t ) 4 w' GA R Y W 012 2 -0 0 212 30 2.09 t ) 471 J 012 2 -00 213 294.24 MARYLEE T 0122 -00214 301.73 MICHAEL T 0122 -00215 325.00 1 9 37 3.06 THOMAS L 0121- 00001A 9 ( ) ` ALFRED C 0122 -00216 7 !•,•► $ 83 IP.A - Oil �72i 41 sj i . CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL- CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8002 CHECK DATE 02-608.85 PERIOD ENDING 02 -01.85 PAGE � DE PI T • NO EM L •N P 0 E MP L OYDE NAME CHECK -NO AMOUNT CLEARED 000.2 464369671 BEMM LOIS N 3204 - COGOI 476,29 3 0002 206242018 EVANS BARRY R 0204- 0002 1 •292.72 t 1 . 0002 1 9 76 9.01 • 0010 4736644F4 JAHN OAVI0 - J 0204 - 00003 10508 r 0010 473900141 JomNSom GREGORY R 0204.00004 0000 t X 1 0010 469 586523 SYANSOI#mJR. LYLE E 0204 -00005 536.21 t y 0010 641.59 • OD12 357340166 CUOE LARRY J 02134 -00006 183.74 t ) . .1` 0012 470 520124 DOHERTY KATHLEEN M 0204 -00007 114.94 t ) 0012 471400908 ZUER� NER JOHN L 0204.00008 109.45 t ) r; 0012 408.13 - '0021 4695010?$ FAUST DANIEL F 0204 -00009 1 1 p089.10 C.. 1 ' r� 0021 469743719 NEVER NANCY E 0204•x0010 0000 t X I 0021 0022 469200614 HAGEN ARLINE J 0204-40011 501 . 49 t ) 0022 390444446 MAT14EYS ALANA K 0204 -00012 - 486.97 -. -- �, ! 0022 476TO4432 MOELLER MARGARET A 0204 -G0013 515.47 t 0022 473327550 VIGNALO DELORES A 0204.00014 491.40 t 1 > 0022 1.99 5. 33 0031 4713221 AURELIUS LUCILLE E 0204-40013 85700 t~ 1 r 0031 476269815 SCHADT JOANNE L 0204 -00016 230.65 t I 0031 474264816 SELVOG BETTY 0 0204.00017 86.02 t 0031 1074e57 + 0033 477288389 GREEN _ _. _ C 0204 -00018 587.35 c V 0033 472244994 HENSLEY PATRICIA A 0204 -00019 205.72 t ) ,. 0033 476620547 KELSEY CONN ±E L 0204 -00020 229.09 t ) ,z 00.33 _ 468364435 VIETOR - LORRAINE S 0204m00021 453.28 T 7 r 0033 19475.64 • r, 0034 474091526 STOTTLEMYSR EDITH G 0204.00022 0.00 t X 003 - 0041 468461 717 COLLINS KENNETH V 0204 - 00023 121 078 t ) 0041 477369263 MARTINSON CAROL. F 0204 -00024 351.47 t ) � . 0041 475323163 NELSON ROBERT 0 0204.00025 692.39 t ) 0.041 477227636 4MATN JOY E 0204 -00026 395.27 t ) . 0041 471502356 RICHIE CAROLE L 0204 -OOC27 380.67 t 1 0041 468602934 SVENDSEN JOANNE M 0204 -00C28 516.61 t ) 0041 2 9 458.19 i . CITY Of MAPLEWOOD OAYROLL- CHECKS 1EGISTER CYCLE 8002 CHECK GATE 02 - 0$i85 PERIOD ENDING 02 - 01a*85 PAGE 2 DEPT -NO EMPLftNO EMPLOYQE NAME C"ECK•%O AMOUNT CLEARED 0042 4774131364 ARNOLD DAVID L 0204 -00029 68.54 t ) 0042 471402115 ATCHISON JOHN H 0204.00030 743.52 - �; + 0042 476721577 SANICK JOIN J 0204 -G0031 611.03 t � + : 0042 470887418 BERGER ON JOSEP" A 0204 -= 00032 513.99 0042 472721660 KOHL JOHN C 0204 -00033 525.51 t _) _......._... _ ... 0042 469689867 BOWMAN PICK A 0204.40034 69103 t ) 0042 468461930 CLAUSON DALE K 0204•©OC35 792.99 t ) 0042 476446119 OREGER RICHARD C 0204 -00036 843.01 0042 470267d87 GREEN NORMAN L 0204.00037 723,82 t ) - 0042 392240565 NAGEN THOMAS L 0204.00038 0000 t X ) CIO 42 4695611516 HALWEG _ KEVIN R 0204.00039 675.64 0042 413604916 HERBERT MIC J 0204.00040 108.67 t ) 00.42 472222231 KORTUS DONALD V 0204.00041 0.00 t X ) __ 0042 471563591 LANG __ RICHARD _ 'J 0204 -00042 610.74 0042 476401388 LEE ROGER Y 0204.00043 704.87 t ) 0042 474607686 MEENA Nv JR JAMES E 0204 -00044 721.98 t ) 0042 46944263 MOESCMTER RICHARD M 0204 -00045 372.00 . 0042 476340990 MORELLI RAYMOND J 0204.00046 394.99 t ) 0042 468462 64 1DELTI'ER - WILLIAM F 0204.00047 71802 t ) _ 0042 - 471564801 RYAN . _ . _ MICHAEL - P 0204-=00048 . - -- .... 79308 r 0.042 470520457 SKALMAN DONALD W 0 20 4.00049 188.38 t ) • 0042 473548226 STAFNE GREGORY L 0204.00050 749.91 t � _._... 0042 471721204 STEFFEN SCOTT L 0204.10051.. 245.60 .- -; 0042 471500251 STILL VERNON T 0204•CO052 747.18 t ) 0042 471629204 STOCKTOIN DERRELL, T 0204.00053 695.49 t ) J' 0042 471602052 TNOMALLa - DAVID J 0204•x4054 __ 597.93 OU42 475363333 WILLIAMS DUANE J 0204.00055 576.95 0042 474260130 P 1A P4 JOSEPH A 0204- 00056 783.71 .: 0042 159199088 f 0043 475548434 - BECKER _..._.._. -_._. R4NAL.0 �_ D 0204 -00057 420:53 0043 469441789 GRAF DAVID M 0204 "C0058 568.22 t ) 0043 469820466 tHE TNL STEPHEN J 0204.00059 819.06 t ) 00.43 - ' -- 392F60009 KARTS _.. FLINT _ -. D' 0204•G0060 183.84 0043 473567791 MELANOER JON A 0204 =00061 66.55 t ) 0043 468360918 NELSON CAROL M 0204• ©0062 19042.71 t ) 00 43 47150 4316 RA ZSKA Z OFF DALE E 0 20 4.00063 7 41.79 0043 474486071 VORWERK ROBERT E 0204.00064 265.56 t ) - , 0043 469502201 YOUNGRDN JAMES G 0204 -00065 768.84 t ) OQ4 3 4 9 877.10 i 0045 4714018T6 EMBERTGON JAMES M 02U4 -40066 833.32 1 0045 472242227 SCHA -3T ALFRED C 0204 - 00067 0000 t X ) 0045 ... 833.32 ' 0046 46 CAHANES ANT"ON r 6 0204•COOb 8 123.87 t � 4 0446 477627236 FLAUGHER JAYEE L 020440069 47204 t ) �; � 0046 376709873 MAOELL RAYMOND M 0204 -00070 460012 t ) CITY of MAPLEWOOD MA�YROLI- CHECKS= GISTER CYCLE 8002 CHECK DATE 02.0$ -m85 PERIOD ENDING 02 -a1 -85 PAGE .5 DEAT•NO EMPL -NJ EMPLOYEQE 4AME CHECK -NO AMOUNT CLEARED ;2 0046 4738071030 MARTIN SHAUN M 0204 -00071 456.74 t � 0046 472365919 NELSON KAREN A 0204•a00T2 464.63 t ) 0046 468600183 RABINE JANET L 0204 -00073 460.13 0046 417700322 STARNKE JULIE A 0204 -CO074 374.66 t ) 0046 2812.44 1: 00.51 471440267 BARTA MARIE L 0204 -00075 249.37 t ) 0051 473566872 HA IDER KENNETH 6 02134 -00076 39.22 OD 51 504483174 WEGWERTN JUOITH A 0204mQ0077 367.41 t ) k 00-51 .... _.__. __ ...... _ ... 656.00 0052 496308314 CASS WILLIAM C 0204.00078 681o89 t 002 471526254 FREBr_RG RONALD' L 0204-00079' 629.92 I ) 0052 502544037 NELEY RONALD J 0204 - CO080 228.33 t ) 00152 471501241 KANE MICHAEL R 02C4m00081 445.53 t ) _ - ....__._...- _ 0052 468363473 KLAUS?NG VENRY F 0204.00082 506.52 t 0052 475601431 LUTZ DAVIO P 0204 -00083 498.22 t ) .. 0052 471500547 _ MEYER GERALD Y 0204 -00084 386.81 t ) VOID - REPLACED Ck #020400214 OQ52 476904500 OSWALD ERICK 0 0204- 00085 0.011 I X -') 0052 468166755 PRETTNER JOSEP" 8 0204•C0086 863.68 t ) _ 0052 472241464 REIN =RT EDWARD A 0204 -00087 673.34 t ) .0052 4TO346224 TEVLINiJR 'HARRY 1 0204 -40088 664.72 - t.. .: 0052 475589777 ZAPFA JAMES M 0204mG0089 0.00 t X ) 0052 . _ .. _ _. .... �. _ .. ___... .. __ _ ..._... _ .. s 018.96 il 0053 0053 4 7 8 2b 39TO 472481010 AHL JR. ELI AS .._.. _ _ .. . -. _. RAY JAMES -_ __._ _ C _ _.. 6 0 20 4 -00090 0204-40091 - 832 87 • .... 6 89. S1 t ) s : 0053 161 GEISSLER WALTER M 0204.00092 657.46 t ) 0053 501464671 GESSELE JAMES T 0204.00093 781e27 t ) 0(153 47544168E PECK _ DENNIS L 02044/0094 581 • ST - -- .�; 0053 472662522 PR IEBE WILLIAM 0204- w00095 495.49 0053 _. 4 , 0038.83 • 0054 473683775 LOFGREN JOIN R 0204 -00096 403.68 t ) 00 -54 403.68 0058 471562563 ORE14EIN RO Y 0204 -0OO97 592.31 005R 477602582 EDSON DAVID 8 0204.0D098 729.10 t ) 0058 470541590 MULWEE GEORGE Y 0204- 00099 496.67 t ) 00.58 471 501014 NADEAU EDWARD A 0204 -00100 635.86 . 0058 468361720 NUTESON LAVERNE S 0204 -00101 579.83 t ) 0058 471365993 OWEN GERALD C 0204 -00102 599.38 t ) OQ58 3963305 + 0059 476249760 MACDONALD JO"N E 0204 -00103 528.66 t ) A 00.59 475501000 MULVANE Y DENN M 0204m00104 716.67 t ) _....... 0059 1 9 245.33 _ _ . CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL- CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8002 CHECK DATE 02.08 - PERIOD ENDING 02.01.85 PAGE 4 D PT•NO E ENPL -NO EMPLOYEE NAME C+HECK•NO AMOUNT CLEAREO .. ±., 0461 .477301066 BRENNER LOTS J 0204 -00105 131.17 t 0061 468341993 KRUM4EL BARBARA A 0.204 -00106 161.82 r 0061 473260369 ODEGARD ROBERT 0 0204•CO107 1 9011 •05 t ) ► 0.061 468582618 STAPLES PAULINE 0204 -00108 605.14 t ) M� 0061 1 w 909.18 469821909 - BEEBE _ JOHN J 02114.00109 242.31 t 0062 474928762 BRENNER JAY A 0204 -00110 0000 t X ) ; 0062 471447219 BURKE MYLES R 0204 -00111 75.82 ' 44i1 0062._ _..__.. 47180331 7 CARLSOM _TIH0THY D 0204 -00112 -- _ 273o97'' C 3 141 0062 474608182 GERMA DAVID A 020 610.87 t ) 0062 472303411 GUSINDA....... MELV IN J 0204.00.114 1.010.50 <<<.� 0062'_ _ 502 5�►4121 �ELEY �R OLA N0 B 0204 - 00115 646.47 t T 0.062 468514797 MOPKI NS THOMAS C 0204 -00116 0.00 ( X ) '' 0062 469744593 HOSCMIKX JAMES E 0204.00117 0.00 ( X f 0062 _ 473969'ta4 HUNTER - TONY 0204.00118 8• t f~ i 0062 471748313 LIBMA RDT THOM 0 0204 -00119 0.00 t X ) .2, i 0062 473503. 9 1 S LINOOR FF DENNIS P 0204 -00120 618.78 t ) __'0062'____ 473565506 MARUSKI - MARK - -__... A 0204 -00121 698.11 t 1� --- - -- :. 0062 444444444 WEAL TODD W 0204.00122 0.00 t X 1 00.62 474018128 RASCHKE ALBERT F 0204.00123 0.00 t X ) 471646662 SANOQUIST t�IOMAS _ J 0 W4440 124 • I X 7 0062 473660035 STARK RICHARD E 0204 - 00125 134.43 0062 475904169 TOWNLEY MICHAEL F 0204•'00126 0.00 t X 1 006 2 477691931 TOVNLE Y PATRICK J 0 20 4 -00127 0. 0 t X . j . 7. a062 415T45266 WARD TROY G 0204mQ0128 0.00 t X f ; 0062 398164091 YUKER WALTER A 0204 =00129 - - -Y y 53.08 - 0062 49472.54 * ' 0063 301884242 AAL64.ARD - ROSS _ _A 0.00 _ ... OD63 470940175 ANDERSON CORISTINE M 0204 -00131 0.00 t X 0063 475823190 BARTHOLMY JODY N 0204.00132 0.00 t X f OQ.a3._._._,M• ...4+T28s5265 BEAMAN __... _.. _..__.. WAYNE -- -•_-- -- - -- L 02Q4•VQ133..__...__ -_. O.OQ 0063 4689682 77 BESETH RONALD L 0204.00134 0.00 t X ) 0OA 270463791 BLACK WILLIAM J 0204 -00135 0. 00 c X ) 469844634' 80EVER ROBERT J 0204.00'136 85A 0063 478283346 BOEVER RAYMOND L 0204.00137 76.98 t f ' 0063 472362015 BORASH DONNA F 0204.00138 0.00 t X ) .s` 0(163 470962448 BRYANT ROBERT' _ 0 0204 -00139 040 ' 0063 474442414 BUNKE RICHARD H 0204.00140 120.90 t ) 0063 474029717 BZOSKIE DENISE 0204 -00141 45.00 t ) . CASSE0kY ELIZ BETIr_._._ J- 0204.00142 __.__._.. .00 00 ► ".R 0463 4736.84916 CASS_OkY MARY K 0204.00143 0.00 t X ) ±a- 0(163 4 ?'2 90 50 69 COLLINS* STEVEN A 020 4 -POO 144 0.00 t X ) h J 0063 469441338 MARS _. _ _. SANDRA - ._._. -L 020 4•CD 148 -` 0.00 t X f - ._..._ ... _.._ _ s► 0063 474829219 DIESEL JERRY 0 0204.00146 0.00 t x ) ►, OQ63 474901922 DIND ;RMAN JANINE M � -© 0 2D 0147 0: t X ) 0063 - 476721245 DOUGHTY LINDA R 0204- 00148 - 0.00 . -__- t X It: y3 OC163 47690008 DRAKE BARBARA i 0 20 4.00149 0.00 t X f 17b CITY OF MAALEWOOD PA YROLL•CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8002 CHECK DATE 02 -08 -85 PERIOD ENDING 02.01 -85 PAGE 1 DEPT -NO EMOL -NO EMPLOYEE 4AME CHECK -NO AMOUNT CLEARED 0063 469948845 FALTEISEK JAMES E 020400150 0.00 t X ) ( 00.63 472921037 FISCNER SUSAN M 0204 -00151 0000 t X I 0063 473925557 FOWLER MARY K 0204 -00152 0.00 t X " 1 i 0063 477983735 GALBRA ITH CHRIS 0204•C0153 0.00 t X ) 0063 469983628 GRAF MIC 0 20 4m00 154 0.00 t x ) �� 0063 502+825654 HAMM DEADRA . M 0204 -00155 0.00 t X ) - 1 00.63 475826712 -HARPER JAMES 0204 -00156 0000 t x f ( 0063 474947RI 1 HEIMERL CAROL 0204 -001 S7 0.00 t X ) 0063 476686996 " ERBER KAR I N J 0204.00158 0.00 t X f 00.63 473998785 HOLLINGSWORTH LISA 0204 -00159 0.00 t X ) 0063 468982050 HOLTAN TAMMY J 0204 -00160 0.00 t X ) - 0063 4 7372 5137 AUNT JACK. "" 0 20 4.00161 0 000 t X ) 1 0063 470691140 JOMNS O1# JOSEPH A 0204-40162 0.00 t X) � OG63 469876100 JOHNSON TERESA L 0204.00163 0000 t X f 0063 470922847 JOHNSON TROY _ 0204 -00164 - ._ 0.00 1 ' DQ63 469862099 KANE KAREN 0204mCC165 0.00 t X 0(163 470680548 KIELSA KAR I J 0204.00166 0.00 t X f 0063 476743753 KLASSEN SUSAN 0204 -00167 0000 t X ) 0063 474143915 KORTUS JAMES M 0204 -00168 0.00 i X f 0063 468984615 KRUMMEL BECKY J 0204.00169 0.00 t X f 0063 472484219 LE CLAIR MARY L 0204.00170 0000 t X ;. 0063 472880498 LOEFFL.ER CAROL J 0204.00171 0.00 t X f 00.63 473269324 MAC DONALD ELAINE E 0204 -00172 0.00 t X f 0063 476923936 MAGILL JOSEPH M 0204MG3173 36.00 f ' L 3(163 473700729 MIAHRE MICHELE A 0204.00174. 0.00 t X 0063 470926903 MESSIN KATHLEEN M 020400175 0.00 t X ) " - 0063 474966150 MIHELIC" CINDI L 0204 - 001176 0.00 - t X 0063 469583307 NISKA JANET A 0204.00177 0.00 t X 1 0063 474745123 NOESEN CRISTIN A 0204.00178 0. 00 t x 00.63 469820020 - _ .. _ OLSEN Q 0204.00179 _ . - 0.00 . -. t X 1 l !' 00.63 473565827 OLSON ROBERTA J 020400180 0000 t . X 0063 472806158 P MARCIE 0 0204 -00181 0.00 t X f 0063 S PEARSON LESLIE A 0204 -00182 0.00 t x r ' 0063 472941928 PELTIER MICHAEL R 02f]4- 00183 0.00 t X ) 0063 468827763 RADA MICHAEL F 0.204.00184 0.00 t X 00.63 469900639 ROBERTS PAUL J 0204•.00185 - 0.00 t X 0063 248210342 SETTLES GERALD 0204w00186 0.00 t X f 0063 480161518 SHELD09 LEO 8 0204.00187 66050 t ) 0(163 396604919 SINNI GER SARAH J 0204 -fl0188 0.00 t X ) 0063 477869067 SPANNHA -UER DAWN M 0204 -00189 0.00 X ) 0063 46994 53 TO SPANNSA UER EVA C 0204- 00190 0.00 t X ) 0063 469742645 SPANNBAUER KATHLEEN G 0204.00191 0.00 t X ) 0163 474845176 SPAN48RUEI MARTIN J 0204.00192 0.00 t X ) 0063 469965435 SPANNRA;UER SUSAN L 0204 -00193 0.00 7 X ) _ - 0063 477920170 STRAUS LAURA J 0204.00194 0.00 t X f 0063 476861156 SULLIVA =N JULIE 0204 -00195 0.00 t X ) ' 00.63. 471823921 SZURTK JOANN M 0204 -CO196 0900 t X 1 0063 470626422 TAU84AN DOUGLAS J 0204 -00197 620979 t f 00.63 470'963203 WALLACE JON T. 020400198 0.00 t X � 0063 396324246 WARD ROY 6 020400199 289.82 t ) 00.63 4777409,11 WEBER RICHARD J 0204- 00200 12400 t ) 0063 47692 7674 MI ECK THOMAS J 0204 - 110 201 116.81 t f 5 c. i . 1 I City OF MAPLEWOOD PIAYROLL•CHECKS R_CISTER CYCLE 8002 CPECK DATE 02 -08.85 PERIOD ENDING 02- -07.85 PAGE 5 OEP%T -NO EMPL -NO EMPLOYEIE NAME CHECK -NO AMOUNT CLEARED 0063 474606610 ZAHN WILLIAM A 0204.00202 0.00 t X 1 s� 0063 1.581.80 + }I 0064 151440508 GREW JANET M 0204 -00203 556.44 t 1 ,t 0064 47/384624 HORSNELL JUDITH A 0204•CO204 261.15 t 1 - , OQ64 474542163 SOUTTER CHRISTINE 0204m00205 305.62 t 1 0064 ;1! 0071 389448993 CHL.EBECK JUDY M 0204 -00206 367.77 t 1 ,I _.. .... ____._.__--- _..._- - 0071 475502495 MISKELL NANCY ......_J 0204.00207 0.00 t X 1 14 ` 0071 470540551 OLSON GEOFFREY 1i 0204•G0208 840.14 t � 1 s 20791 + . _... _ .. _._._. __._..._._..._.... __._..__.. ...... -- __...... _..._ - --- 0072 477627178 EKSTRANO THOMAS G 0204 -00209 579.49 t 1 -, 0072 475609505 JOHNSON RA ND ALL L 0 20 4.00 210 70309 t 1 _ 0072 1.282.58 O(V3 476090677 OSTROM . MARJORIE 0204 -- 00211 829.75 t .z -.; 0073 829.75 + h �<< j• 0074 468109223 G IRAR D LAWRENCE 0204 , m00212 0000 t X I - -- _ -...__.___ . �. _.�_ _...__ _ .- ..� __ . -_ -- • -- -- 0 0 7 4 _ _... _.._. 3 8 7 5 2 0 7 7 6 M E NG E R _ .._ ROBERT E R T J - 0 13 0 201► 0 Z ..... S S .4 1. 00.74 579.45 ! ; 0052 471500547 MEYER GERALD S 0204 -00214 470.37 COUNT 00.213 1 GRAND TOTAL 63 I • • t , r r •t ` } db 4e! �_7 -2 MEMORANDUM r- TO: City Manager • FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson SUBJECT: Time Extension -- Preliminary Plat LOCATION: Keller Parkway and Arcade Street APPLICANT: Richard Anderson ; OWNERS: Richard Anderson and Frank Frattalone PROJECT: Gervais Overlook SUMMARY Action by End ors Rejected Date Request Approve a one -year time extension for a twenty lot, single- dwelling subdivision. The applicant has not been able to secure financing for the portion of the site that he owns. Mr. Frank owns the portion of the proposed plat that abuts Arcad Street (page 5). Mr. Anderson intends to move forward as quickly as possible on his portion. Mr. Frattalone can develop his portion of the site without platting. He has agreed to grant the required easement for Beam Avenue if he proceeds prior to final plat approval for Mr. Anderson's portion. Recommendation Approve a one -year time extension for the Gervais Overlook preliminary plat. BACKGROUND Past Actions 2- 13 -84: Council approved the Gervais Overlook preliminary plat for twenty lots (page 5 ) which was considered by council on April 15, 1982, on the basis that: 1. The location of the Beam Avenue intersection with Arcade Street is more desirable than the December 1983 proposal. 2. Ramsey County's upgraded County Ditch 7, together with the ponding to be provided onsite, would address the localized drainage concerns. 3. The soil conservation service has stated that the soils on the fringe of the ons i to wetland. can be successfully removed and f i 1 led for building. 4. The lots would average 14,679 square feet or 4,679 square feet larger than required by code. 50 The proposal is compatible with the requirements of the environmental protection and shoreland ordinances, the zoning code and land use plan. Approval of the preliminary plat shall be subject to: 1. The City of Little Canada ordering city water to this site. The plans shall be approved by the Maplewood City Engineer, 2. Final grading, utility and drainage plans shall be submitted for approval by the city engineer. These plans shall provide for: a. The lowest floor level ( including basements) of all permanent structures shall be no lower than 864.6 feet. b. Compliance with grading, filling and water quality manage - ment plan requirements of Sections 36 -566 (f)-and 36 -567 (b) of the shorel and ordinance. These plans shall consider the recommendations of the soil conservation service in their January 9, 1984 report. 3. A signed developer's agreement, with required surety shall be submitted to the director of public. works for all public improvements, including a temporary cul -de -sac at the east end of proposed Beam Avenue. 4. Payment of a deferred water assessment. 5. Removal or relocation of the garage to comply with.setback requirements. 2 610 'Proof by land survey that the existing dwelling (and accessory structure, if retained) would be located consistent with setback requirements. 7. .Submission of an opinion from a registered soils engineer that the lots as proposed are buildable. This report shall include a statement. of the remedial procedures necessary to. remove any soils material that is questionable as a foundation for building. 8. The name "Block 2 shall be placed on the lots south of Beam Avenue. 9. Lots 12 through 16 may be realigned to front on Arcade Street. D1 a1nn i Section 30 -5 (e) states " For one year following preliminary approval and for two (2) years following final approval, unless the subdivider and the city agree otherwise, no amendment to a comprehensive plan or official control shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout, or dedication or platting required or permitted by the approved application. Thereafter, pursuant to its regulations the c i t y extend the period by agreement with the subdivider and subject to all applicable performance conditions and requirements, or it ma' require submission of a new application, unless substantial physical activity and investment has occurred'in reasonable reliance on the approved application and the subdivider will suffer substantial financial damage as a consequence of a requirement to submit a new application. In connection with a subdivision involving planned and staged development, the city may by resolution or agreement grant the rights referred to herein for such periods of time longer than two (2) years which it determines to be reasonable and appropriate." jc Attachments: 10 Location Map 2. Gervais Overlook Twenty Lot Preliminary Plat I o W : 60 j� ��_ AY _:. AVE. 2 Koh /mon w Loke U K O H L M A N AVE. Q 23 : J _ _ h Z RO W / W - W O J W J 6. p t h - 58 Z O H .. J d to u �. Cr R'- t H v �I ._...., 22 ar c R 61 m: 60 }� ' L E , GERVAIS AV E. 0 j :Ai L� V IK • �T� SHE R RE v • . .. Keller _ E F I[ 25 J LA O u !. Lake C OUN TY o LAURIE t p E L L A N t G -J ° 2 S 49 25 49 . O JUM TION AVE v � DURKE V t -i� .' U RKE Q AVE >` + E AV. 1` ELDRIOG e E L Al O AIT n L, vs i:::1 Cd DN > [ JOE L Id 014 F ®r 1: SK ILLWAN `' v : ; ' V LA. = p VE u SKILL YA M o W � t t 1 W m MT &N. : 0 qY RY VE CA a f 11 li LOCATION MAP 4 Attachment One 4 N 7 79 85 Ss X150 e • F — s' 3 2 1 W ° o B OCK m o m Lr e N o '� : :. . .........::1 lay •. :: ;. 1 O 0 a o -ti• - ° 1 0 V 3 8 o 60 b 4t 9 , m son / ot O0 7 -/ 0 1, PRELIMINARY PLAT'FOR 20 LOTS- (approved 2- 13 -84) Owned by Frank Frattalone 5 attachment two 4 N moo,., a -- S v L /yI, iU s�1d G Zd a 6 D P zerjldjL) GY Z,U -1 109 /r��'vr �� v c,LJ /L/7 L) �A-:r o v -2 7 Ynz R Z)74 - c n � IJJA �'� 12 e s v Y- A e� L b loo �� v�LI D jivC v� • -l t) - fA 4 S 11112 �F2Fn� CIA( J -- 3 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager ' --- --- - FROM: Finance Director RE: Transfer to Close Improvement Projects �`= --- - - - DATE: January 25, 1985 In order to close the accounting records for 1984, transfers are needed to close three improvement projects that have been completed. These projects have surplus balances as follows: $17,382.95 Project 78 - 09 West Frost Ave. and East Shore Drive 46,467.29 Project 81 -04 Adolphus Street Sanitary Sewer 2,921.63 Project 82 -09 Frost Avenue - Birmingham to White Bear Ave. According to State law, these surplus balances must be transferred to another public improvement project or to the sinking fund for the bonds which financed the projects.' The sinking fund related to these projects has a sufficient balance. However, Project 80 -10, Highway 61 Frontage has a deficit. Therefore, it is recommended that the Council authorize the closing of the above projects by the transfer of their balances to Project 80 -10. cc: Public Works Director DFF:1nb J _3 MEMORANDUM TO: Ci ty Manager .: �_ __ ..; ` r1 i0 FROM: Finance Director - - - - -- RE: Transfer to Close Improvement Projects u u.�.,._... -�� - - DATE: January 25, 1985 I'n order_to close the accountinq records for 1984, to close three improvement projects that have been projects have surplus balances as follows: $17,382.95 Project 78 -09 [Jest Frost Ave. 46,467.29 Project 81 -04 Adolphus Street 2,921.63 Project 82 -09 Frost Avenue - transfers are needed completed. These and East Shore Drive Sanitary Sewer 3irmingham to White Bear Ave. According to State law, these surplus balances must be transferred to another public improvement project or to the sinking fund for the bonds which financed the projects. The sinking fund related to these projects has a sufficient balance. However, Project 80 -10, Highway 61 Frontage Road, has a deficit. Therefore, it is recommended that the Council authorize the closing of the above projects by the transfer of their balances to Project 30-10. cc: Public Works Director :D=F F : l n b k 7 - q MEMORANDUM '? i To: Barry Evans, City Manager From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Community Servicesf `- ''��' Subj : 1985 Fee Schedule For Reservation of Park Faci 1 i 6 es J4 w J _..n.•�__�...� Date: January 23, 19 8 5 ` * �" �� +�_ z,. w �• The Maplewood.Park and Recreation Commission at their January 21, 1985, meeting discussed the proposed 1985 Fee Schedule For Reservation of Park Facilities as prepared by the Community Services staff. (Same as 1984 Fee Schedule). Motion by Don Christianson, seconded by John Chegwyn, to recommend to the City Council approval of the 1985 Fee Schedule For Reservation of Park Facilities as prepared by staff. Enc.(1) 1985 Fee Schedule 1985 FEE S CAEDULE RESERVATION OF PARK FACILITIES 1) Daylight Athletic Field reservations, including rinks and fields, are free. This does not include use for Tournaments or League games. 2) Light charge for use of lights at Wakefield and Goodrich Park will be $13.50 per hour. Light charge for use of lights at Hazelwood Park will be $17.00 per hour. Charge for use of rink lights will be.$8.00 per hour /rink. 3) Tournaments held in Maplewood:, A. All Tournaments 1. Motorized vehicles are not allowed outside of designated parking areas. 2. All games must be completed by 10:00 p.m. with all people out of the park by 10:30 p.m. 3. Rental fees must be paid one week in advance of the first scheduled date of the tournament. 4. Tournament flyer and rules must be turned into Community Services two weeks in advance of the tournament. 5. Maplewood Community Services retains the right to cancel any tournament due to field conditions or inappropriate conduct of Tournament Director or participants• the fields and 6. Parking lots are to be cleaned along with surrounding grounds. B. Softball Tournaments: 1. Must be sanctioned by MRPA or USSSA. 2. Maple Leaf Officials Association Will have exclusive rights to work any tournaments held in Maplewood. 3. No games may start at Wakefield #F1 before 11:00 a.m. on Sundays. C. Fee structure for State, Regional or National Tournaments will be decided separately. 4) Classification of Groups Wishing To Use Facilities: and Group A: City sponsored groups, local youth groups, athl etic groups local community service organizations Group B: Local private groups, teams : or organizations Group C: Outside teams, groups or organizations 5) Softball Tournament Fee Structure: A Group B Group C Group a. Field Use (Per Field /Day) N/C ! $25.00 ; $40.00 b. Marking Compound (Per Bag) $3.50 3.50 3.50 c. Park Shelter (Per Day) .10.00 25.00 25.00 d. Lights (Per Hour /Field) 13.50 13.50 13.50 e. Hollywood Bases (Per Set /Day) N/C 5.00 5.00 f. Field 8 Liner Drags Shovels b Rakes N/C N/C N/C Garbage Pickup (Per Field Used) 10.00 10.00 10.0 g ' 100.00 100.00 200. h. Damage /Cleanup Deposit 1 i. Key Deposit 25.00 25.00. 25.00 j. Community Services Staff (Per Hour) 7.00 7.00 7.00 6) Soccer Tournament Fee Structure: 'Group A Group 8 Gr oup C a. Field Rental (Per Field /Day) N/C j $25.00 $40.00 1 b. Marking Compound (Per Bag) $3.50 3.50 3.50 c. Hazelwood Lights (Per Hour) 17.00 17.00 17.00 d. Lining of Soccer Field (Per Field) 18.00 18.00 18.00 e. Soccer Nets (Per Pair /Day)($1 Dept NIC 5.00 5. 00 f . Garbage Pickup(Per Field Used) 10.00 10.00 10.00 g. Damage /Cleanup Deposit 100.00 100.00 10 0.00 h. Key Deposit 25.00 25.00 25.00 J. Community Services Staff (Per Hour) 7.00 7.00 1 7.00 J. Portable Toilet (Necessary if more than .8 teams) Fee to be determined. 7) All field rentals for leagues or games other than tournaments: A. City sponsored groups, local youth groups, athletic groups and local community service organizations - No Charge B. Local private groups, teams or organizations* - $10.00 /game for soccer and $5.00 /game for softball C. Outside teams, groups or organizations - $25.00 /game for soccer and $10.00 for softball ' * To qualify as a local team, group or organization, at least 502 of the members of that group, team or organization must be Maplewood residents. Proof of residence must be brought to the Community Services office by each individual; in addition, a team roster aunt be brought in for our files. 8) Rink permits will be granted to City groups for special skating parties or activities . only during hours not normally scheduled for public skating at a fee of $17.50 /hour for supervisor and lighting rental fee.. 9) Puppet Shows - for special showings by the.City Traveling Puppet Theatre -- $65.00 /show. (Over) AS PREVIOUSLY STATED9 ALL GROUPS WILL' BE REQUIRED TO MAKE A $100.00 DAMAGE DEPOSIT WIT H THE OFFICE OF COMMUNITY SERVICES. RENTING GROUPS ARE REP TO SIBLE TO MAKE SURE ALL TRASH IS PUT IN TRASH RECEPTACLES FOR PARK OCREWS DAMAGE COLLECT. IF PARK AREAS ARE LEFT CLEAN AND IN GOOD REPATR THE $1 AKEFIELD GOODRICH, DEPOSIT WILL BE RETURNED. ALL GAMES UNDER THE LIGHTS AND HAZELWOOD PARKS ARE SUBJECT TO LIGHT FEES AS P REVIOUSLY STATED. THE CITY OF MAPL EWOOD RESERVES THE RIGHT, EITHER DIRECTLY OR THROUGH ITS DES- IGNATED REP RESENTATIVE, TO OPERATE CONCESSION FACILITIES AT PUBLIC PARKS WHERE TOURNAMENTS AND SIMILAR EVENTS ARE BEING HELD. GROUPS MAY PURCHASE CONCESSION RIGHTS FOR A FEE OF $50.00 /DAY FOR TOURNAMENTS WHERE BEER WILL BE SOLD AND $20.00 /DAY FOR TOURNAMEETS NOT SELLING BEER. CLERK'S FOR CITY THE SALE OF BEER, A TEMPORARY 3.2 LICENSE MUST BE PURCHASED THROUGH THE DATE ' OFICE IN CITY HALL. IN ADDITION, EACH APPLICANT MUST HAVE ,. INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR ANY LIABILITIES THAT MAY BE INCURRED. " " CONCESSION ALL CONCESSIONS AT WAKEFIELD #1 MUST BE SOLD THROUGH THE J•C ON STAND LOCATED STAND. CONCESSIONS AT GOODRICH MUST BE SOLD THROUGH CONCESSION IN THE PARK BUILDING. ANY SEER WAGONS VANS, OR TRUCKS MUST BE LOCATED IN PARKING LOTS ONLY, AND , CANNOT REMAIN ON THE PARK PROPERTY OVERNIGHT. THROUGH THIS TO IS POLICY, THE OFFICE OF COMMUNITY SERVICES RESERVES THE RIGH SER- REQUIRE, AT THE APPLYING GROUP'S EXPENSE, THE ASSIGNMENT OF A COMMUNITY VICES DEPARTMENT STAFF MEMBER TO BE PRESENT DURING TOE DURATION OF THE EV ENLY . STAFF MEMBER WILL PREPARE THE FIELDS AT THE START OF EACH TOURNAMENT DAY STAFF PERSON IS ASSIGNED TO PROTECT THE INTEREST OF COMMUNITY SERVICES. FAILURE TO MEET ANY OR ALL OF THESE CONDITIONS WILL RESULT IN FORFEITURE OF THE $100.00 DAMAGE DEPOSIT. ALL GROUPS ARE RESPONSIBLE TO REPAY IN FULL ANY AND ALL DAMAGES RESULTING RENTAL FROM THEFT OR VANDALISM TO ANY EQUIPMENT OR FACILITIES USED DURING THE PERIOD. Permission is hereby granted to Name of Group) ) p to use (Park) i (Dates and Times) For the purpose of conducting a (Type of Activity) This permit is issued with the understanding that: (Name of responsible person) (Address) (Phone) will be responsible for adherence to the "Policies b Regulations for use of City Park Facilities ". Permit is conditioned upon the following, Fee Schedule: 1) Park Rental Fees: a. Field Rental .....•••••••••••00000•0000.000 b. Bases ...... ............................... c. Marking Compound .......................... d. Park Shelter ..............••••••••••••••••• e. Cleanup Fee ............................... 2) Concession Rights ....................0.0.0•••••• 3) Community Services Staff ........................ 4 ) Damage D e p o s i t . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5) Key Deposit............ .: .............••........• b) Others: a. ........ ............................... be . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sub -Total Less Deposit TOTAL AGREED UPON BY: Park User DATE: Maplewood Community Services) MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO:.Maplewood Community Services I CL Action by council: MEMORANDUM Endorsed... TO: City Manager ModiILled� FROM Director of Community Development Re J ected SUBJECT: Park Acqui LOCATION: Geranium Avenue ----- - OWNER:: Washington Federal Savings and Loan Association (Represented by Castle Design and Development Co . , .Inc . ) DATE.: January 31, 1985 Request .Approve the purchase of a 9.2 acre parcel for a neighborhood park. P __& ,. This site has been offered to the city for the cost of the unpaid assessments ($31,262.00). as part of a total package, which includes the Beaver Creek apartment PUD . and tax - increment financing. The appraised value of the land is $167,500. The land use plan identifies existing park sites. Future park sites are shown on-the park plan as search areas. This site falls within a neighborhood park search area. If the city purchases this site, the land use plan should be amended to designate it as a park. The park and recreation commission, on December 17, 1984, recommended that this 9.2 acre site be acquired for a park at a cost equal to the unpaid assessments plus interest. The planning commission, on January 21 found that this park would be consistent with the comprehensive plan. Recommendation Authorize staff to purchase the Geranium Avenue park site at a price equal to the unpaid assessments, plus interest. The funds shall come from the tax - increment bond 0 issue . proceeds . BACKGROUND Site Description The site is platted with undeveloped lots and an undeveloped right- of -way. (See page 5.) Surrounding Land Uses North: Geranium Avenue. Across the street are quads, a double dwelling and two single dwellings. East: a double dwelling and two single dwellings all fronting away from this property South: an unimproved 33 -foot wide portion of Magnolia Avenue right - of -way. There is a steep hill dividing this site from the Beaver Lake Elementary School and the Maple Oaks Funeral Home. West: a single dwelling on a large lot and quads 7- 26 -73: Council approved a conditional use permit for the Maple Greens planned unit development (PUD) as shown on page 6. Fifty -two quad units (13 buildings) were approved for the subject site. 7- 20 -78: Council approved a preliminary plat for the Maple Greens 3rd Addition. It contained the subject site as approved for development in 1973. 12- 13 -82: Council approved the Sterling Glen Addition final plat. It encompassed about two - thirds of the Maple Greens 3rd Addition preliminary plat and all of the subject site. This final plat did not alter the preliminary plat configuration approved in 1973 for this site. 11 -8 -84: Council denied a revision to the PUD to allow the construction of 64 apartment units in eight buildings. (See page 7•) Planning 1. Land use plan designation: S, school (southwesterly portion of the site) and RL, residential lower density. The school district is not planning to use this site. 2. Section 462.356, subd. 2 of state law states that: "After a comprehen- sive municipal plan or section thereof has been recommended by the pl anni -ng 2 agency and a copy filed with the governing body, no publicly owned interest in real property within the municipality shall be acquired or disposed of, nor shall any capital improvement be authorized by the muni ci pal i ty or special district or agency thereof or any other political subdivision having jurisdiction within the municipality until after the planning agency has reviewed the proposed acquisition, disposal, or capital improvement and reported in writing to the governing body or other special district or agency or political subdivision concerned, its findings as to compliance of the proposed acquisition, disposal or improvement with the comprehensive municipal plan." Public Works Sanitary sewer and water are available. Parks 1. The park plan in the comprehensive plan shows this site within the search area for a neighborhood park. (See page 11.) 2. Neighborhood parks are intended to provide the basic park services on a strictly local basis. The service area should be limited to 112 mile and serves between 3,000 and 5,000 people. The park serves the primary needs of persons from 5 to 17 years of age and also affords limited opportuni - ties to all age groups. These sites should provide year round programs. The park site should contain at least 5 acres suitable. for recreation and a recommended standard for neighborhood parks is 2.5 acres per 1000 residents. If possible these sites should adjoin an elementary school. 3: The property owner's engineer stated that extensive soil borings have been done on the site and there should be no significant limitations for park development. jW - n + +M.-kmnr%+r i. vocation map 2. Property line /zoning map 3. Maple Greens PUD 4. Sterling Glen site -plan 5. Beaver Lake land use plan 60 Neighborhood park plan 3 p do d • i L I P Q� R I R R 31 1 1 . .F M R 2) tPUDj 7 M� R F —._ • / M ? wain ,ar.E 4� a R3 a. , R3 `. �--- N C - P .R3 42 R3 � . R ( Jo: (—' F .1 Q Y R A R - a.rt A 'r � r��17v[C - EQ L � '. ♦� R R .� F - , W a •rR F F jr R I '� M R �. R R' F F •' �. w • R R 2 BC '� R Ip R -3/ R 0 PIT � R IA I C *Af • R ©c ! M 2 M2 LOCATION MAP attachment one 4 Q N SOW '7 T t OUTL OT C rr,,,, !►' ' 4 h 2 _ t9� S . • �. ... ST. t ' w Dnc= A _ G L 2 _ - B _� _ ` - - .2' a 1 a + fir r • • �- ! .. _" _ ~'" O ff A ` , ! + z j 3 2 ,, �` �' W .` ! _ p W IN t o �1- ft ..! 98 . S S i, r 3b • S r� j At .. S S7 �� • GERAMUM -• ,� - "Alit •„ ` , ` . Y 5 40 37 �- r y � o r r �•. ' � 'tip O r 2 _ .1L 6 32 3 1 1 7.f i J 2 1 Z.0- � �S . it 3 off 4 28 27 33 w vjl ,25 it IC 7 6 • i ' 23 a ti ,• = - ♦ 19 ;r = 6 4 V 2 % 1084 1 N 21 ,► 20 • i7' � s 16 13 12 9 , 48 5 r, - — t $7� CU R - " � t�� 07' 'o' s� � �- . •' � N � j o •-`- o ar '�. 1 � e Oaks ' 3 BEAVER L KE ELEMENTARY M aP _ ,. , ,.�. SCHOOL Funeral Hom S C HC LL 01ST. oT os -N 0 '622 •� o C � (A 9 9 ....) ft �* c s 1. 4 f .a ) 1 ._i �� ~ � t C �� i f .� 1 7j' S ' T A. • 10.1 - • :OV Lt � .So � � t . j LINE I P ROPERTY MAP PROPOSED PARK SITE attachment two i w 4: 5' 9 9� t% 2 1 3 16 , � � oe 17 i•.�t 7 LO �O AO AO LO 1�� , 2 3 6 7 10 t1 t4 I •� O .:.� . ..O •o 8 [ U", ? *1 '7 T t OUTL OT C rr,,,, !►' ' 4 h 2 _ t9� S . • �. ... ST. t ' w Dnc= A _ G L 2 _ - B _� _ ` - - .2' a 1 a + fir r • • �- ! .. _" _ ~'" O ff A ` , ! + z j 3 2 ,, �` �' W .` ! _ p W IN t o �1- ft ..! 98 . S S i, r 3b • S r� j At .. S S7 �� • GERAMUM -• ,� - "Alit •„ ` , ` . Y 5 40 37 �- r y � o r r �•. ' � 'tip O r 2 _ .1L 6 32 3 1 1 7.f i J 2 1 Z.0- � �S . it 3 off 4 28 27 33 w vjl ,25 it IC 7 6 • i ' 23 a ti ,• = - ♦ 19 ;r = 6 4 V 2 % 1084 1 N 21 ,► 20 • i7' � s 16 13 12 9 , 48 5 r, - — t $7� CU R - " � t�� 07' 'o' s� � �- . •' � N � j o •-`- o ar '�. 1 � e Oaks ' 3 BEAVER L KE ELEMENTARY M aP _ ,. , ,.�. SCHOOL Funeral Hom S C HC LL 01ST. oT os -N 0 '622 •� o C � (A 9 9 ....) ft �* c s 1. 4 f .a ) 1 ._i �� ~ � t C �� i f .� 1 7j' S ' T A. • 10.1 - • :OV Lt � .So � � t . j LINE I P ROPERTY MAP PROPOSED PARK SITE attachment two t -soap" f aiftolveal 2" `'• 400, op • - • ,• gj� • RT ,,: �c• 3 • •�� 1 t r ' � -) `� ty7 Yom' •)/ ;•'� 1 i• � • - Lj 40 00pob L r tc�t INN - •t3� mac �a - &"on� 'G fti f. f lb% -.tom _ •�, y. n n l 7 i} L 11 - - ^ TE Q UA cv..,. y •�1 {' U i•. 1 . '{iL V � ' ..� • ow* Ott 0 .' oimt SEND I - :: 1' 1L t MAPLE GREENS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TABULATION NORTH APARTMENT SITE: 170 UNITS TOWNHOUSE SITE: 44 UNITS SOUTH APARTMENT SITE: 110 UNITS • • QUAD HOME SITE: 128 UNITS DOUBLE HOMES: - 16 UNITS SINGLE FAMILY HOMES: 22 UNITS TOTAL: 490 UNITS •• � = ' i •� ' - q uad structures or 52 -'dwel i i n i � • ., a ; .: �,, ., �, l,. - . �� • SUBJECT. SITE l3 q r 9 • - 1 �:, 'units •� • x, .• J • .I • • attachment three MAPLE GREENS MAPlEW000 MINNESOTA I� i • , I { 1 .f I t I 1 i � 1 • I i s . t i 1- 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN CSqptember 11, 1984) STERLING GLEN attachment four 7 4 N cif AVEWR r {� i RI SC A;p�-# Larpenteur Conway Beaver Lake NEIGHBORHOOD LARD USE PLAN attachment five i W u cc ° Maryland Ave. M Stillwater Road SC �......, r Harvester w 0 w E 0 SC l� A? Minnehaha Conway Beaver Lake NEIGHBORHOOD LARD USE PLAN attachment five i I 9A411 Sri At two 6 0 ; "�, . is 0 pop go &61�4vq_ s @,W@ @ vp 17 Fuluro Future mpil m P IMP MAPLEWdbl) ��., •44,,•44 q Et" T �S low r of J6vj&,tj_m emt 000"es, on T:S ji T PAUL IMMt I •� • � t � j � r i • ' AZ W OD .600 6.1 L KOHLM'AN Ful ure � I,t MP LAKE Park District and Boundar F 0 0 U R 0 ii.Lllsuso N the "m is ky ON V rq J rjo w - -e- cn�f find should 07P L �_� not be used where symW vow#; Al. I IS "Mulw, enj IS staff it J."Itt can 1 L r r J1 6 me e Pr IL..-L- • �� , t1e«.1, Fulure L11 0 oil." M. It Out GE L 41:4 q.-I 4pmmmmm�w SOS ILL. Is$ art si x A* - ft, 4 �. v- �P IV 9 1 . It tl I i I .11 -1 . 13L., ._114 Mr.. I rimmme4u i. ��• NJ" F @ - #/ SERN 914ER-1 I A 1, "r 1 911 . • Sol. i % 1 z " % $I *.,I .. iej� . ;1 • 1 L #fee* L F uture A re MP i1� I �I • ff t4C U e S , it t; IL. l �' v ';" it �j �a,��s�n�+at��' ~� I y '17 Lill J 3M oaten Low GOAL: 1 Park 3000 Residents and Parks - Within 1/2 Mile of Residents • Existin Neighborhood Park and Service Radius Mini Parks C+ C1+ CV Proposed Nei Park and Service Radius =r rm �3 Future sites are search areas on (A __j • X Pr6., . jared by: hborhood 115 Uk t g 0 0 UQ�Q� Wilt IkAs t orow W 55414 W-52111 Conce t e v i s o., : 6-13-84 i • "184 't q I . o • October 1980 sm _,, ,��,� ... +,� 444,4 �I • 1 3m IS VII e,- 111. i rr it-lit too - 91 I O R e VII11 NEW BUSINESS r A. Park Acquisition--Geranium Avenue Secretary Olson said the request is for the planning commission to decide whether a parcel of land. for a neighborhood park would comply with the city's comprehensive plan. Commissioner Sl etten moved the planning commission recommend the city council find the proposed site in conformance with the comprehensive plan. Commissioner Larson seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Barrett, El lef son, Fischer. Larson, S1 etten., Whitcomb MEMORANDUM IF-/Z- TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Beaver.Creek Apartments Planned Unit Development LOCATION: Northwest of Ferndale Street and Ivy Avenue APPLICANT: Castle Design and Development Co., Inc. OWNER: Washington Federal Savings and Loan Association DATE: January 16, 1984 .Action by SUMMARY E��n.r Request P e t A. planned unit development for 180 apartment units. .date r`nmman f- c This should be the last development, on the former Maple Greens PUD. Council previously approved the Beaver Creek condominium site by allowing the density approved for the north part of the PUD to be transferred to the area north of Maryland Avenue. The balance of the land was to remain open space. The current proposal is to transfer the density from the Sterling Glen site to the Beaver Creek apartment site and sell the Sterling Glen site to the city for a park. While this would result in 183 more units being built than were approved in the original Maple Greens PUD, the density is still within the limits of the land use plan and a park would be acquired adjacent to the single dwelling and quad units. Recommendation Approval of the enclosed resolution (page 12 that shall cancel and supersede that portion of the previously approved Maple Green's PUD that applies to this site, subject to .the following conditions: 10 Land5capi ng plans and building elevations must be submitted to .the community design review board for approval before a building permit is issued. 2. Parking. areas shall be striped and all bituminous areas shall have continuous concrete or bituminous curbing. The parking lot shall be kept in a continual state of repair. 310 Site security lighting shall be provided and shall be directed or shielded so not to cause any undue glare onto Jim's Prairie or the public cul -de -sac. 40 No adjacent property shall be disturbed. Any property irons removed due to construction of the site shall be replaced by the appl icant. 5. The applicant shall provide a monetary guarantee in a form acceptable to staff in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of all required, nonpublic site improvements, if the work has not been completed by occupancy. 61 Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans shall be submitted for staff approval before a building or grading permit is issued. 7. The drainage plan shall direct as much run -off from roofs and landscaping to Jim's Prairie as feasible, provided that run -off shall not exceed predevelopment levels. The parking lots shall not be allowed to drain to the prairie. 8. The cul -de -sac shall be constructed and have one layer of bituminous in place before any occupancy permits will be issued. 910 The emergency exit road shall be constructed from the apartment project to Maryland Avenue to support emergency vehicles and the pathway shall be paved from the apartments to the proposed private street in the condominium project prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. A public easement for walkway and emergency vehicle access shall be re.corded from the apartment parking lot to Maryland Avenue, over the proposed path and future private street in the Beaver Lake condominium project. An additional eight -foot wide public easement for a walkway shall be recorded from the walkway to Jim's Prairie, west of buildings B and C. The emergency vehicle access must be maintained and kept free of obstructions by the respective property owners. 1.0. The developer shall install 1,000 feet of six -foot high, nine gauge, chain link fence, with no larger than one inch mesh, along the boundary line between ,Tim's Prairie and the Beaver Creek apartments, starting at the west boundary line. A three -foot wide, lockable chain link gate shall be installed at the end of the public easement. Installation shall take place prior to any grading of the apartment site, The fence shall then become the property of the city, 11. Before a building permit is issued, a statement shall be recorded with the property, granting the city the right to burn Jim's Prairie.. 12. A developer's agreement shall be provided before issuance of a building permit for all public improvements, the emergency access road, storm water ponding easements and erosion control measures. 13. In return for city approval of tax- exempt mortgage revenue financing and tax- increment financing for the cul -de -sac, utilities and emergency access road, the developer shall provide: a. Storm water ponding easements to the city over the Beaver Creek apartment and Beaver Creek condominium sites at a cost equal to the assessments to these sites from the Beaver Creek improvement project. b. Deeding to the city of lots 1 . through 16, block 1 and lots 1 through 36, block 2 and the south 141 feet of lots 38 and 39, block 2, Sterling Glen Addition for the cost of.the unpaid assessments, plus interest. The developer shall then pay off the unpaid assessments, plus interest. This transaction shall. occur at the time that the tax increment bond issue proceeds are available to the city. 2 c" 14:. Approval includes the site plan enclosed in the January 16, 1985 staff report. Any changes that result in an increase in density or change in building type or site plan shall require a public hearing :and approval by the city council. '150 A PP royal . is valid for one year from the date of city council . approval, subject to Section 36 -442 of city code. 0 3 BACKGROUND Project Descriptio n 1. Construction of 180 apartment units in three, three -story buildngs, amenities to be provided would include underground parking, pool, party room, whirlpool, sauna, outdoor sunning area and tot lot. (See page 10 for site plan.) 2. There would be 180 underground parking stalls and 197 exterior stalls for 377 total parking spaces. Code requires 360 spaces. 3. The target population would be professional singles, couples without children roomates and single parents. 1 4. The proposed rents would be: a. 36 one - bedroom units at $405 /month b. 54 two- bedroom, one -bath units at $460 /month C, 90 two - bedroom, two -bath units at $500 /month 180 51 A 960 -foot long, public cul -de -sac would be constructed as the main -cess to the development. This would include an over - sized wat; yin that would be extended through Jim's Prairie and would even- ly be looped to the north. 5. A Len -foot wide, paved walkway and emergency vehicle access would be constructed south from the project, along the west property line to the Beaver Creek condominium project on Maryland Avenue. 7. Construction is estimated to begin in March 1985 and be completed by March 1987. Site Description 10 Gross acreage: 29.4 2. Net acreage: 28.0 3. Existing land use: (Beaver Creek apartment site) undeveloped Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: a nature area called Jim's Prairie. This land is unique because it is a virgin, wet prairie - -it has never been cultivated. It is used by the city's naturalists . as a teaching area. Southerly: Beaver Creek condominiums Easterly: Rolling Hills mobile home park Westerly: undeveloped property zoned M -1, light manufacturing and planned for BW, business. warehousing. 4 Past Action 7- 26 -83: Council approved the Maple Greens PUD which. included the proposed site , acreage a now referred to as Beaver Creek condominiums and 9 Sterling Glen (page 9 ) . Beaver Creek Condominiums 5- 23 -83: Council approved a revision to the Maple Greens PUD to res i to the 170 apartment units from the north end of the PUD site to the property known as Beaver Creek condominiums. Sterling Glen 12- 13 -82: Council approved the Sterling Glen Addition final plat for nineteen quads. ll_ Council denied a PUD revision to build 64 rental apartments instead of the Sterling Glen quads. 12 -17 -84 : The park and recreation commission recommended that the -Sterling Glen site be P urchased by the city for a park for the cost of the unpaid assessments. Planning Land-use plan designation: RM, medium density residential. The F:. signati allows a maximum density of 22 people /net acre. 2 Pro osed density over the condominium and apartment sites: 19.3 P Y people/net acre (all RM land). 3e Maximum density allowed by the land use -plan for the entire Maple Greens PUD: 19.5 people /net acre (includes land planned for low and medium density)* 49 Proposed density over the entire Maple Greens PUD: 18.5 people /net acre. 6. Section 36 -442 (b) of city code requires ten findings for approval of a conditional use permit. These findings are. i.ncl uded in the resolution on page 12. Soil Conservation Service Comments "For the most.part, the proposed site lies within soils suitable for development. The,. exception being the roadways which will pass over 5 s organic soils generally not suitable for road construction. Due to the existing topography, proximity to a wetland, ditch system, proposed grading and protected prairie ecosystem erosion and sediment will be an acute problem. To minimize environmental impacts and maintenance costs, it is suggested that the following preventative measures are taken: 1) A hydrologic study be undertaken to discern what, if any, impacts the proposed land use changes will have 'on the prairie ecosystem. This effort should be coordinated with a competent botanist who specializes in prairie ecosystems. 2) An erosion and sediment control plan be developed incorporating the attached standards and specifications. They include silt, fence, straw mulch, temporary seeding, temporary storm sewer inlet protection, storm sewer out fall riprap and appropriate design . cr i ter is for the lagoons to act as temporary sediment basins. 3) A stable road base be developed within the organic soils with the appropriate cross culverts." COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS Park and Recreation Commission The commission recommended approval of this project on December 17, 1982 abject to the following conditions: 1. . x -foot chain link fence with gate to be erected before the cut and 1 operation. 2. Their landscape architect would work with our naturalist on the landcaping - -at least on the north side of their property. 3. Erosion controls could be maintained. 40 Would have the right to burn the prairie with a special permit. 5. Have public use of the walkway 6. Would work out a maintenance plan Community Design Review Board The board recommended approval on January 8, subject to conditions that are included in the staff proposed PUD conditions., 3c Attachments: 1. Location map 20 Property line /zoning map 3. original Maple Greens PUD 4. Site plan 5. Beaver Lake land use. plan 6 Resolution 7. Park and recreation minutes 8. Community design review board minutes 90 Planning commission minutes 10. Beaver Creek PUD plan (separate attachment) Cti 1 R 2 7R2) R a W R 1< J ° v F A2 i F F R3 R �-{LOC (PUD) f F R3 R3 (R2) F • F R3 J R R ! R . t PU01 M� • M2 W A q'�►�Kf R� R3 � R3 PROPOSED �� ""�'•��'�� R CREEK ---� = = • f;:::�. 1 tPUDI � "` BEAVER RZ R3 �-- CREEK CONDOMINIUMS . R 1: PUD ! R K V*+ •� F STERLING GLEN QUADS I A'•tir_ is •vt ' .F i R f � - I C G. P R a a t J ? ' E Mrf 5, .i• ay T 14 Q Ii►� s oo R F � 6 _ R fw - L R � F F C i F wlNti MAMA &%V _ V -_ 8C • R I� ti do LOCATION- MAP .7 Attachment One Q N t. ■ vp Ml R3 0 pw • (1• a .�.� - - �..__ -- -- - ■ii-■ Eva" PRAIRIE ��.ti; ,..,. .,. ,.: f r JIM'S .i :. ;,{ .�, , ,. , •� x- ; � , {tin � � -.� •��\ :'� , �;,�� ,�'• • '';�'•?Y `j . �ti�+�?:: - ,�1,.,,,�•.r ?•.�;.ti , ti�, . '� :tiff-{ ' • • {'��' ;•x,?��:1 ,, '�: �� ; ; {••.' :t••. �'� v. •; .l• .: .,rte ..� :'h�h�,�," y, �� : �;j�'. �y{ti.:: Y,'�. • �,rt•. • �:-'�' y. ��.; •.. %a..: >� ROLLING HILLS ., - 'fit 7! .S%!. , f`� :•. ,�, , �� x ti .• �,� ti ��..•: . � ;.� ��•;;�� :,, �,�` -. • ,,� �: A�:: MOBILE NOME PARK 0 0000.' LM ia.s A s R3 i i f BEAVER CREEK CONDOMINIUMS F S lag I � 4 s L �- - .-• .Qa t * CAVES CENTURY ■ ADDITION QUADS 16 !: 17 ■ t' PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 8 Attachment Two l ' • � tasA• �t•VI 1M 1 � M ; te r • -• . � t . � .. •, �. • • r '1 �} ' I N old U. lk r t ' • °�- cS�h _ �� APARTMENTS ' r •, '�•'' MARYLAND AVENUE t, ' l t, Q • ' p�, .i��• �rrl •• tp ,. � �.� r J X11 �. Il �`' W swl 18, • t./i f 0- U -- � . t .t..• ---� t It. , ,• 4 r•• • , �'f , z E _ --� tt l h - Ci U �• LJLJ LAJ W ' I • . • . _N % woo of cm jj d • MAPLE lMAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA ' • 9 TABULATION NORTH APARTMENT SITE: 170 UNITS TOWNHOUSE SITE: 44 UNITS SOUTH APARTMENT SITE: 110 UNITS QUAD HOME SITE: 128 UNITS r DOUBLE HOMES: • 16 UNITS SINGLE FAMILY HOMES: 22 UNITS TOTAL: 490 UNITS r - ORIGI NAL PUD w��_ _L — _ — t TL •• •�'•••N� r r•_rr• • 1 1 ♦� / ` . `•• ••r ��• • ` •` • OF / �Tt r 1 • ( { • / 1 \ �� • •r / •/ ' � • , � '• � • ♦ • •� `\ • . • / •. _ ' • • � •' � �` � � . , � - •• .. � ! �� Mr • � � . 1 1 I � � ♦ \ ♦ ♦ • � i� = = -_ �- I i •� .' ' , r •. I . �� . �• T'�_ ' I••1 t1 1 I ' ,• I ♦ • ` te r •, \ ` \ J. I — �� • 1 r.tr ` Or 0 .4 10 all - • / I . 1 • �� •�_•� • �• �� ` • ♦ � • • ,I � / ' / • i ce ••. ��' �.,�r \ \• dr 01 _ ♦ � • � /.� ,' / •./� •`�� .' � .l � / / `•_•� 1 fi r,\ � ,••�• // �• . t I I �I •• • , ,1 � / . r��r 'Ir _•r_rrr_�•� •r_ •` 1 Ir _ • I � L'�f./ •• •• � � ��,••! 1 11 1 1 1 1 • ,r►i' \` 1 1 \\ 1p I 1 1 I' •- - -�- - r . 0 ,l, ` , !, • • 1 1 SIT[ DATA I • �., J . too • % op rl dF 1, { ••,. � .. � � • r ' � 1 � I ' _ t • ` r M WO tt { 1 ` , • • � � • •fi r Mrl • AID 1 • �' / ' _ PRELIMINARY UTILITY fCMEiATIC '-BEAVER CREEK APARTMENTS 1 • • I I �. • � •RETCH /LAM •� I • met 1 I 1 1 '• (Its • •_ter • ••+� •• , �' I • • • • V Y ' A t o • ` 111�� 1• / ♦ • I - •M111< @miss# 1 .. 11 /M 1 I • o, / I 1 • �� • • 1 1 _ lu 1 1 ,11.11 1 1 • , 1 • � I � 1 ' .` 1 ,• � � _ ..•I 1 1 1111 • � 1 : • !. . . • W J Q D Z tY W LL_ SITE PLAN BEAVER CREEK APARTMENTS 10 attachment four 4 N b y c ,r SC Larpenteu r d -v • ° Maryland Ave. New Stillwater Road sc ,.....N Harvester w w E S sc r Minnehaha Beaver lake NEIGHGORHOO.D LAND USE PLAN attachment five 11 4 N Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and r held in the council chambers in said city on the 11th day of February, 1985 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Castle Design and Development Co., Inc. initiated a conditional use permit for a planned unit development for the following- described property: gat part of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 lying sout'n, sterly of a line from the Northeast corner of said Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 to a point on the West line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 and 450 feet south of the original C. St. P & 0. Ry right of way also the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4; a Section 24, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, subject to st. _ right-of-way, This p� operty is more commonly described as northwest of Ivy Avenue and Ferndale Street. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by Castle Design and Development Co., Inc. pursuant to the Maplewood Code of .Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on January 21, 1985. The planning commission recommended. to the city council that said permit be approved Z. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on February. ll , 1985. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports. and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE,' BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described conditional use permit be approved and supe rcede the previously approved Maple Greens PUD on the basis of the following f ind ings -of -fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2 . The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare, attachment six 12 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 59 The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, .glare. smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run - off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7e The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at. public cost for public f a c i l i t i e s and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 90 The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval-is subject . to the following conditions: 1. Landscaping plans and building elevations must be submitted to the community design review board for approval before a building permit is issued. 2. Parking areas shall be striped and all bituminous areas shall have continuous concrete or bituminous curbing. The parking lot shall be kept in a continual state of repair. _ 3. Site security lighting shall be provided and shall be directed or shielded so not to cause any undue glare onto Jim's Prairie or the public cul -de -sac. 40 No adjacent property shall be disturbed. Any property irons removed due to construction of the site shall be replaced by the applicant 5. The applicant shall provide a monetary guarantee in a form acceptable, to staff in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of all required nonpublic site improvements, if the work has not been completed by occupancy. 60 Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans shall be submitted fo.r staff approval' before a building or grading permit is issued, 7. The drainage plan shall direct as much run -off from roofs and landscaping to Jim's Prairie as feasible, provided that run -off shall not exceed predevelopment levels. The parking lots shall not be allowed to drain to the prairie. 13 8. The cul -de -sac shall be constructed and have one layer of bituminous in place before any occupancy permits will be issued. 90 The emergency exit road shall be constructed from the apartment project to Maryland Avenue to support emergency vehicles and the pathway shall be paved from the apartments to the proposed private street in the condominium project prior to the issuance of an . occupancy permit. A public easement for walkway and emergency vehicle access shall be recorded from the apartment parking lot to Maryland Avenue, over the proposed path and future private street in the Beaver Lake condominium project. An additional eight -foot wide public easement for a walkway shall be recorded from the walkway to Jim's Prairie, west of buildings B and C. The emergency vehicle access must be maintained and kept free of obstructions by the respective property owners. 10.0 The developer shall install 1,000 feet of six -foot high, nine 9 auge, chain link fence, with no larger than one inch mesh, along the boundary line between Jim's Prairie and the Beaver Creek apartments, starting at the west boundary line. A three -foot wide,. lockable chain link gate shall be installed at the end of the public easement. I shall take place prior to any grading of the apartment site. The fence shall then become the property of the city. 11. Before a building permit is issued, a statement shall be recorded with the property, granting the city the right to burn Jim's Prairie. 12, A developer's agreement shall be provided before issuance of a building permit for all public improvements, the 'emergency access road, storm water ponding easements and erosion control measures. 13. In return for city approval of tax - exempt mortgage revenue financin g and tax- increment financing for the cul -de -sac, utilities and emergency access road, the developer shall provide: a... Storm water ponding easements to the city over the Beaver Creek apartment and Beaver Creek condominium. sites at a cost equal to the assessments to these sites from the Beaver Creek improvement project. b. Deeding to the city of lots 1 through 16, block 1 and lots 1 through 36, block .2 and the. south 141 feet of lots 38 and 39, block 2, Sterling Glen Addition for the cost of the unpaid assessments,.plus interest. The developer shall then pay off the unpaid assessments, plus interest. This transaction shall occur at the time that the tax increment bond issue proceeds are available to the city. 14. Approval includes the site plan enclosed in the January 16, 1985 staff report. Any changes that result in an increase in density or change. in building type or site plan shall require a public hearing and approval by the city council.. 150 Approval is valid for one year from the date of city council approval, subject to Section 36 -442 of city code. n Adopted this 11th day of February, 1985. Seconded by Ayes- - STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. - CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the 11th day of ' February, 1985, with the original on file- in my office, and the same ._ y is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permit. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , .1985. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 15 PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION 12 -17 -84 'Staff stated that Castle Design and Development Co., Inc. offered to sell the City an 8.8 acre parcel located south of Geranium Avenue at the intersection of Evar St. and Glendon St. t.o be used as a neighborhood park. The developer has proposed building 180 apartment units adjacent to Jim's Prairie. The price for the park would be the payment of the balance of assessments on the property which is approximately $33,000. Ken Gervais, Vice - President of Castle Design & Development Co., Inc.., was present at - the meeting and displayed maps of the site under discussion. Tax increment financ in.g has been requested to construct streets for the development. He stated the property teas been appraised at approximately $22,000 an acre. The following neighbors hbors were present to state their viewpoint: Mark Hender - 1158 Glendon - Favored park Malcolm Johnson.- 1139 Ferndale - Favored park Jim Bonn - 1145 Glendon - Favored park .Tim Kennedy - 1134 Glendon - Favored park Mr. Gervais stated that the offer was not given in lieu of any P.A.C. charges for the development. Commissioner Piletich _MOVED that the Park and Recreation Commission would be wil to take the 8.8 parcel of land as a s i t e for a future park by assu the balance of the assessments on the propert SECONDED by Commissioner Chegwyn; AYES: All. Mr.. Gervais displayed maps indicating drainage from his proposed development would flow south. The property deed for Jim's Prairie was established in 1903 and was ac- q y uired b the railroad at that time; in 1965 it was deeded to the City of Maplewood with a retention of , 19 feet for the expansion of the railroad tracks. It was taken t Ramse Count to be p ut on the tax rolls, but somehow was lost and not filed and o y y P still belongs the railroad until the City obtains another deed. He felt the con - str.uction of his development would not affect the water table. At this point in the meeting, Naturalist Chris Soutter presented a slide show of plants found in Jim's Prairie. She noted the significance of the three acre s i te, how it was being used and managed, and concerns about the potential damage to the site. The area is a valuable undisturbed virgin prairie and has State -wide significance. programs Educational ro rams are conducted at the site by the Maplewood.naturalists. It is controlled by regular burns which are important to preserve the prairie; a three year cycle burn plan has been arranged with the East County Line Fire Dept. - the last. :burn was 1983. Other concerns Chris noted included: - grading and erosion would native plants and bring in we seeds - mechanical disturbance by equipment - After completion of construction, concerns about foot traffic and dogs, motorized vehicles, dumping, and runoff from fertilizers and pesticides - Long term concerns about problems if the water table would be lowered Po nd.i n 9 to the southwest of the development that could bac kf l ow and flood the . pr a i r i e - How grading of the hill could affect watershed of the area - If the burning of the area would be affected since the .buildings must be 500' from the area and the apartments are only 50' Fencing Jim's Prairie was discussed. 16 �Mr. Gervais stated: - Straw could be used for controlling erosion A ten foot wide path has been included in his development for emergency vehicles which is incorporated into a walking system with Beaver Creek - Would be willing to plant grass that would complement Jim's Prairie - possibly using prairie grass The proposed plan will be discussed at the Planning Commission meeting on January 7, the Design Review Board on January 8, and the City Council in February. Commissioner Christianson MOVED to table the discussion until a future time NO SECOND. Mr.. Gervais stated . an issue may not be tabled unless there is an emergency. Mfr. Gervais stated he was in agreement to: - "Present an erosion plan to the Engineering Department to protect Jim's Prairie - Fence along his property only on the north side Would sign a waiver to burn Jim's Prairie - Would work with the department on selection of grasses - Would work out maintenance plan whereby grass cuttings would be bagged to prevent them from going into Jim's Prairie and possibly not cut within 25' of the fence. - Would offer meeting room for Naturalists to give educational programs about prairie - The type of fertilizers that would be desirable to the Naturalists would come into the educational programs - The 10' wide'traii may be used to gain access to the prairie A gate will be installed in the fencing Commi- ssioner Christianson MOVED that the Park and Recreation Commission recommends the approval of the proposed Beaver Creek apartments if the following conditions are met - six foot chaff nl i nk fence with gate to be erected before the cut and fill operation - their Landscape Architect would work with our Naturalist on the landscaping at least on the north side of their property — erosion controls could be maintained would have the right to burn the prairie with a special permit have public use of the walkway - would work out.a maintenance plan SECONDED by Commissioner Schneider; AYES: Commissioners Chegwyn, Piletich, Zappa, Jani and Schneider; NAYES: Commissioners Christianson and Fox; MOTION PASSED. 17 7 COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW -- JANUARY 8, 1985 B. Beaver Creek Apartment Site Plan Ken Gervai s, applicant, was present and said that the conditions as outlined were worked out with staff. They are asking for a rev ision.to the PUD. He indicated this is adjacent to the old Marylake Road which gave access to the city dump. Records have been researched and nothing was found to indicate the city owned the right —of —way. According to the original PUD, Maryland Avenue was to be a cul —de —sac rather than continuing through to Century and McKnight. The city has requested that a 16 water l i n e be extended through this property to the north to service the Hillcrest Development property -in the future. The board questioned if there was suitable property on which to construct • the apartments as much of the land is marshy. Mr. Gervais indicated there is acreage which is all gravel. They did some soil boring on the property. He commented on the general drainage of the area, this is the reason the storm sewer is being constructed. This property is receiving drainage from approximately 26 other properties. The storm sewer w i l l eventually discharge into Beaver Lake. through the system. They are not going to take or subtract from Jim's Prairie. They w i l l be constructing a fence along the property line. There w i l l be a no cut zone for 20 to 25 feet. They will work with the botanist on types of grass. There will be an erosion control plan submitted. which would incorporate the use of plastic rather than hay bails so seeds will not be incorporated into Jim's Prairie. There will be an easement leading to Jim's Prairie which w i l l serve as a walkway. Board Member Deans moved the board approve the site plan for.the Beaver Creek Apartments, subject to: 1. Approval of the site plan does constitute approval of a building permit landscaping plans or building elevations. 2. All trash dumpsters shall be stored in masonry enclosures with a 1007 opaque wooden gate according to ordinance, and shall be a color and material compatible with the building. Location and design shall be subject to staff approval. 30 An erosion control plan, acceptable to the city engineer, shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building or grading-.permit for erosi o'n control during construction, 4. Parking areas shall be striped and all bituminous areas shall have continuous concrete or bituminous curbing. Parking lots shall be kept in a continual state of repair, 5. If construction has not begun within one year of approval, board review shall be - repeated. 6. Site security lighting shal 1 be provided and shall be directed or shielded so not to cause any undue glare onto adjacent properties or roadways. 7. No adjacent property shall be disturbed. Any property irons removed due to construction of the site shal 1 be replaced by the applicant, 18 attachment eight 8. Grading, drainage and utility plans shall be subject to the c i t y engineer' s approval. 9. The applicant shall provide a monetary guarantee in a form acceptable to staff An the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of any site improvements, nat completed by 10. The cul —de —sac shall be constructed and have one layer of bituminous in place before any occupancy permits w i l l be issued, 11. The emergency exit road shall be constructed from the apartment project to the private street in the condominium project in a manner acceptable to staff, prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. A public easement for walkway and emergency vehicle access shall be recorded from the apartment parking lot to Maryland Avenue, over the proposed path and future private street in the Beaver Lake condominium project. An additional public easement for a walkway shall be recorded from the walkway to Jim's Prairie, west of buidling B and C. The emergency vehicle access must be maintained and kept free of obstructions by the respective property owners. A road f rom the end of the path to Maryland Avenue shall be constructed before occupancy to at least support emergency vehicle access. 12. A six —foot high chain link fence gate shall be erected on the south and east borders of Jim's . Prairie. A gate shall be located at the end of the walkway easement. 13. Approval of the site plan does not include a recommendation on any potential negative effects on Jim's Prairie, Board Member Rossbach seconded Ayes- -all. 19 B. PUD-- Northwest of Ferndale and Ivy (Beaver Creek Apartments Secretary Olson said the proposal is a planned unit development for 180 apartment P t units. Staff is recommending approval of the request. d Public Works Director Haider explained the project that will be constructed to service this property. He said Jim's Prairie w i l l not be disturbed during this construction. Mr. Ge rva i s indicated that his attorney ill work with the city y attorney with reference to the agreement to be recorded giving the right to the c i t y to do the controlled burning of Jim's Prairie. They will also not cut within 15 to 25 feet of the fence to it will remain natural. He said the y did work with staff on the proposed development. The complex is 60 unit apartments with underground parking., Because of the soils surrounding the proposed development, this is the only location that can be constructed on. The commission discussed concerned about the management of Jim's Prairie as it may be affected by the-de * vel opment. They also felt the fence would be overly restrictive to the public. They al so' felt there was excessive requirements placed on the developer with reference to Jim's Prairie and the preservation of its ~- Commissioner Whitcomb moved the plannip commission recommend the city council 8 y i cl approve the following resolution: WHEREAS, Castle Design and Development Co., Inc, initiated a conditional use permit for a planned unit development for the following—described property: _ That part of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 lying southeasterly y g ste ly of a l i n e from the Northeast corner of said Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 to a point on the West Tine of said Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 and 450 feet south of the original C. St. P.M. & 0. Ry right of way also the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4; all in Section 24, Township 29, Range g 22, Ramsey County, subject to street right —of —way. This property is more commonly described as northwest of Iv Avenue _ y e and Ferndale street. WHEREAS,. the procedural history of this conditional use P ermi t is as follows: 2 1 -21 -85 1. This conditional use permit was i nti ated by Castle Design and Development Y Co.. Inc. pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on January 21. 1985. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the above - described conditional use permit be approved and supercede the previously approved Maple Greens PUD on the basis of the following f i nd i ngs- of-f act: 1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare, 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 50 The use would not be hazardous, detrimental. or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to.. the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. b. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, uti 1 i ti.es, schools and parks. 8, the use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 90 The use would preserve and incorproate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Landscaping plans and building elevations msut be submitted to the community design review board for approval before a building permit is issued. 2. Parking areas shall be striped and all bituminous areas shall have continuous concrete or bituminous curbing. The parking lot shall be kept in a continual state of repair. 1 -21 -85 .3 3. Site security lighting shall be provided and shall be directed or shielded so not to cause any undue glare onto Jim's Prairie or the public cul -de -sac. 4. No adjacent property shall be disturbed. Any property irons removed due to construction of the site shall be replaced by the applicant. 5. The applicant shall provide a monetary guarantee in a form acceptable to staff i n the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of all required nonpublic site improvements, if the work has not been completed by occupancy. 6. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans shall be submitted for staff approval before a building or grading permit is issued. 7. The drainage plan shall direct as much run -off from roofs and landscaping to Jim's Prairie as feasible, provided that run-off" not exceed predevelop- ment levels. The parking lots shall not be allowed to drain to the prairie. B, The cul -de -sac shall be constructed. and have on layer of bituminous in place before any occupancy permits w i l l be issued. 9. The emergency exit road shall be constructed from the apartment project to Maryland Avenue to support emergency vehicles and the pathway shall be paved from the apartments to the proposed private street in the condominium project prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. A public easement for walkway and emergency vehicle access shall be recorded from the apartment parking lot to Maryland Avenue, over the proposed path and future private street in the Beaver Lake condominium project. An additional eight -foot wide public easement for a walkway shall be recorded f reom the wa 1 kway. to Jim's Prairie, west of buildings B and C. The emergency vehicle access must be maintained and kept free of obstructions by the respective property owners. 10. The developer shall install 1,000 feet of six -foot high,_ nine gauge, chaff n 1 i nk fence. with no larger than one inch mesh, along the boundary l i n e between Jim's Prairie and the Beaver Creek apartments, starting at the west. boundar y 1 i ne. A three -foot wide, lockable. chain l i n k gate shall be installed at the end of the public easement. Installation shall take place prior to any grading of the apartment site. The, fence shall then become the property of the city. 11. Before a building permit is issued, a statement shall be recorded with the property, granting the city the right to burn Jim's Prairie. 12. A developer's agreement shall be provided before issuance of a building permit for all public improvements. the emergency access road, storm_ water ponding easements and erosion control measures. 13. In return for city approval of tax exempt mortgage revenue financing and tax - increment financing for the cul -de -sac, utilities and emergency access road. the developer shall provide: a. Storm water ponding easements to the city over the Beaver Creek apartment and Beaver Creek condominium sites at a cost equal to the assessment to. these sites from the Beaver Creek improvement project. 4 • 1 -21 -85 • b. Deeding to the city of lots 1 through 16, block 1 and lots 1 through 36, block 2 and the south 141 feet of lots 38 and 39, block 2, sterling Glen Addition for the cost of ` the unpaid assessments. plus interest. The developer shall the pay off the unpaid asssessments, plus interest. This transaction shall occur at the time that the tax increment bond issue proceeds are available to the city. 14. Approval includes the site plan enclosed in the . January 16, 1985 staff report. Any changes that result in an increase in density or change in building type or site plan shall require a publfc hearing and approval by the city counci 1. . .15. Approval is valid for one year from the date of city council approval, subject to Section 36 -442 of city code. Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Barrett, Fischer, Larson, S1 etten, Whitcomb. Abstained -- Commissioner El lefson Action by Cou_nc 1: �- Endorsed MEMORANDUM . b, o d.i i ICI _ Re J ected,_.. TO: City Manager Date FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson SUBJECT: Tax- Exempt Financing -- -Multiple Dwellings and • Housing Bond Plan Amendment LOCATION: Ivy Avenue and Ferndale Street APPLICANT /OWNER: Washington Service Corporation PROJECT: Beaver Creek Apartments .DATE: January 3, 1985 SUMMARY Request 110 Preliminary approval of a $10 million tax- exempt mortgage revenue bond program to construct a 180 -unit multiple dwelling project. 2. Amend the city's housing bond plan to include this program. Proposal 1. Three, sixty -unit, three -story multiple dwelling structures would be constructed. 2. The target population would be professional singles, couples without children, roommates and single parents 30 The proposed rents would be: a. 36 one- bedrooms units @ $405 /month b. .54 two - bedroom, one -bath units @ $460 /month c. 90 two- bedroom,.two -bath units @ $500 /month _ 180 40 Amenities to be provided would include: underground parking, 1 pool,, party room, whirlpool, sauna, outdoor sunning area and tot park. 5. Construction is estimated.to begin in May.1985 and be completed by May 1987. _ 6,* The city's full faith and credit would not back these bonds. Comments The proposal complies with the requirements for approval of tax- exempt financing for multiple dwelling projects. Zoning and design review items will be considered in separate reports. Recommendation Adopt the enclosed resolution (page 12) to r 10 Grant preliminary approval for a $10 million tax- exempt mortgage revenue bond program for the Beaver Creek apartments, proposed to the northwest of Ivy Avenue and Ferndale Street, on the basis that: a. The proposed development is consistent with the compre- pensive plan. b. A qualified marketing consultant has documented that: 1) The development will not have a negative impact on the vacancy rates of existing multiple dwellings in the city. 2) There is reasonable assurance that the development will be able to comply with the 20 percent low-to-moderate income requirement over the l i f e of the bond issue. Final approval shall be subject to the following conditions: a. Payment of a lump sum or annual program participation fee, whichever would be more beneficial t.o the city, as follows: 1) Lump sum fee: At bond closing, a lump -sum fee shall be paid in the-amount of one percent of the bond issue, not to exceed $20,000, less the $2,000 application fee, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions. 2) Annual fee: An annual. fee payable on each anniversary of the bond issue. of not less than one- eighth of one percent of the unpaid balance and one-quarter of one percent of the bond issue shall be paid at bond closing, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions. b. . The bond indenture agreement shall require: 1) The developer to annually certify on the anniversary date to the city, compliance with federal low -to- moderate income requirement. 2) The program trustee, as approved by the city council, shall inform the city of any noncompliance trends, regarding the low -to- moderate income occupancy requirement. 2.. Amending the housing bond plan to include a $10 million dollar tax - exempt financing program for the Beaver Creek apartment project. 2 BACKGROUND Site Description 10 Gross acreage: 29.4 (Maple Greens Planned Unit Development) 20. Site size: 9 acres 3. Existing land use: undeveloped Surrounding. Land Uses Northerly: A nature area called "Jim's Prairie." This land is unique because it is a virgin prairie - -it has never been cultivated. It is used by the city's naturalists as a teaching area. Southerly: Beaver Creek condominiums Easterly: Rolling Hills mobile home park Westerly: undeveloped property zoned M -1, light manufacturing and planned for BW, business warehousing Housing 1. On August 27, 1984, council adopted the following requirements for approval of tax - exempt mortgage revenue financing for multiple clwel l ings: The development shall be consistent with the comprehensive _clan. b. The development will not have a negative impact on the vacancy rates of existing multiple dwellings in the city. C. There is reasonable assurance that the development will be able to comply with the 20 percent low -to- moderate income requirement over the life of the bond issue, d. The bond indenture agreement shall require: 1) The developer to annually certify to the city, on the anniversary date of the bonds, compliance with the federal low -to- moderate income requirement. 2) The program trustee, as approved by the city council, shall inform the city of any noncompliance trends, e. A program participation fee shall be paid at the time of bond closing according to one of two formulas: 1 ) Lump sum fee At bond c l o s i n g , a lump-sum fee shall be paid in the amount of one percent of the bond issue, not to exceed $20,000, less the application fee, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions. 2) Annual fee: An annual fee payable on each anniversary of the bond issue of not less than one- eighth of one percent of the unpaid balance and one- quarter of one percent of the bond issue shall be paid at bond closing, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions. 2. To satisfy requirements lb and lc, the applicant hired the firm of Maxfield and Solomonson to complete a market feasibility report for this proposal. (An excerpt is attached on page 11.) Their findings were as follows 4 a. The rental demand in Maplewood is between. 71 to 87 units per year. "In addition, a stable, competitive rental market usually exhibits a 5 percent vacancy rate. With the current rate estimated at about 1 percent (in Maplewood) , 107 additional rental units should be built to bring the vacancy rate to a normal level. Adding this figure to the renter - occupied house - hold growth, Maplewood will need between 178 and 194 new rental units in 1985. After that, additional demand should average between 71 and 87 units per year. For projection purposes, we feel that 185 rental units will be needed in 1985, and then 85 per year through the remainder of the 1980's." b. "Maplewood can absorb the proposed Beaver Creek units, in addition to the 100 rental units proposed by Podawiltz (Hazelwood Avenue and County Road D) , without having a negative impact on the rental market,, either short term or long term." c. "Analysis of area incomes found that the Beaver Creek development should have no difficulty filling twenty percent of its units with low -to- moderate income persons." 3. Federal law regarding the issuance of tax - exempt mortgage revenue bonds for multiple- family housing requires at least 20 percent of the units to be occupied by low -to- moderate income persons until the bonds are retired. Once a person or family is income- qualified, their unit counts toward the 20 percent as long as they reside in the unit even though their income may rise above the ceiling. 4. Low -to- moderate income of 80 percent City area. In 1984, income is reduced by adjusted annual inco; ted rent ceiling for month, excluding the income is defined as an annual adjusted household or less of the average annual income in the Twin the 80 percent ceiling was $25,280. (Gross $750 per adult and $500 per child to calculate me.) In 1984 ,. the , Metropol i tan Council's sugges- low- to- moderate income households was $515 per cost of utilities. 5* Housing bond plan amendment : Council's adoption of the housing bond plan in October 1982. authorized the use of tax - ,exempt financing for multiple_ dwellings. This plan, however, did not include specific development programs. As a result, each time a development is approved for this financing, council must amend the housing bond p l a n . The amendment must be reviewed by the Metropolitan Council before the developer's request for the tax - exempt financing can be submitted to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for approval. E 6. According to Maxfield and Solomonson, the average monthly rent in Maplewood for a one - bedroom apartment is $360. The average for a two bedroom is $4.45. Finance The city may use the program participation fee (Housing item le) for any purpose. 1. HRA recommendation 2.. City council decision, following a public hearing 3 . Submission of the housing bond plan amendment to Metropolitan Council to review for consistency with the Metropolitan Housing Guide 4. Submission of the Beaver Creek apartment bond program to the MHFA for approval jW Attachments 10 Location map 2. Property line /zoning map 3* : ; to plan 4. Lxcerpt from the Maxfield and Solomonson report 5. Resolution 1 , r "' !t i L l R .R2 + F F To R3 R LdC (PUD) F 3 R3 •VT . lu Ri) tl�F • F R3 w t R R R F J _ 2) m l r M j R PROPOSED SITE- BEAVER CREEK APARTMENTS •`'� R UD) MC R , t--•- BEAVER CREEK CONDOMINIUM � S II{ R R t PUD) R - �tlp _ J F • (-' _ STERLING GLEN QUADS pC . ` v LKf • f R � • � �• Q S R F N D D R • !'. j � F R �--' - R �. L3 ► P c , • R F • 3. t = R R L • � R F F •- • - r . ' . ■ � R3 000 ` .01p • t � ■ /• . s• / _ _ .f._.__, - - --- - S was 1t E� � • - Nf •'. 1 ; I N G HILLS ROLL 000 ooe • u■ tam x s MOBILE NOME PARK Aw (puu) R3 CAVE'S CENTURY . ■ ADDITION QUADS r . ■ BEAVER CREEK CONDOMINIUMS PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 7 Attachment 2 N if 0111 dNb 41111 4110' tl f • / / • / • • / �/ • ♦ • 1 dl f • ••� �•• � 1 `�` , i • � -- -- ab dp IS 6 •• / t . .. ��/ �i '�� . /ter ~+ f: •• —•1 s ` fill , 1- ` , i� � a � 1 � ♦ ♦, •as • 114 1 Mb — t dw eve It *64 dw up �---� - 1 ♦ I j / �• •�M b 1 , 1 M t ♦ /•� M • f• • • �� • Ile 1 •• f ` `. , = _ '� �•.. •, • • • ` - •..- dFP Op 1 1 •t �• • 1 t - `—' 1 1111.. •• � � + �� +—..� _ t�� `� 1 •nor , . t t / �. . • .11 ` �,. _ �► _ 1 • / tV�1�1 �` a 1 1 1 1 1 / �• "� � • a i 11 •• r : 1•i1 i • \, 111;1. 11 /"� �i = �"!�� is 1 11 X 1 1 f aq , ' '� • I � ' l 7' � ` '` `` - ` , •• 1 •t .+ I 1 .. 1 • — 1 � NIL •� ' • / 1 1 /. - • •` -- : - - -- Z - - -= - 1 � I JA 1 • • �'' •• %l I f • Z I a* • s eas • GOP / I� �..• ` • •• • ,•�` ` ` t / r 1 f • Or to 0 • . a : . 0 t , IL WAMU CC Ill I I I ce ap All 0 W N. t AL • . f — - 1 • ISO 4F 0 dill jr CO Jov O / • dr • / • —�..r All lb dr ' • / \ dr • #0 tab wr Ob qub % dip all ar • ` , ` . I' • �� • fi r •��— ..��— —.�•� . I ft % 1A 1 —._ — off • , ` a, f t • ' • , • • • •�� • 1 I mo. '• . • / • • 1 • see 0 • •� 8 - - Attachment 3 Maxfield &Solomonson December 20 1984 Mr. Kenneth D. Gerva is Castle Design and Development Company., Inc. 2419 North Margaret Street North St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Gerva is : Attached is our report summarizing our findings on the impact of the proposed Beaver Creek Apartments on the Maplewood market. Our analysis focused on two specific bonding criteria: 1) the impac of these units on overall vacancies in Maplewood, and 2) the number of low to moderate income residents in Maplewood available for this development. Beaver Creek will not have'a negative impact on vacanc in existing rental F t ��: k in Maplewood. On the contrary, our research found a rental vacancy rate C ., ss than one percent in the city of Maplewood, which is unusually low and i s a tes a a pent -up demand for more rental units. A five percent vacancy is t y pi cally accepted as the basis for a healthy renal market to acco=odate turnover, consumer choice and competitiveness. 'T�ierefore, we are confident that Maplewood can absorb the proposed Beaver Creek units in addition to the _ 100- rental units proposed by Podawiltz, without having. a negative impact on the market, either short term or long term. The criterion of having an adequate number of low to moderate income renter households available for the Iife of the bond issue is one which this. property also meets easily. Our analysis of area incomes found that Beaver Creek should have no dif f iculty filling 20 percent of its units with lour to moderate income persons . Our market research and interviews gave us even greater confidence in the mar- ketabil ity of the proposed development. Resident managers told. us that they frequently get requests from prospect renters for new rental units.. Pros— pects want housing with new appliances , clean carpeting and floor covering and modern decors. The recent one week rent—up a four —unit rental building located less than six blocks from the subject site, at rents of $525 per month plus utilities, attests to the marketability of new construction .rental units in this market. The proposed unit. mix and projected rents are also appropri— ate for the. Maplewood market.- We believe the proposed development will be very successful in that. there is a need for more rental units in Maplewood, and. the concept for Beaver Creek will attract renters who want. hous ing in .a new building with amenities . Maxfield & Solomon son, l nc /620 Kicke rn ick Building 430 First Avenue North /Minneapolis M N SS401 /Phone (612) 338 -0012 Mr. Kenneth D. Gerva i s Castle Design and Development Company, Inc. December 20, 1984 Page 2 We have enjoyed conducting this market analysis for you. Please call if -you have any questions regarding our report, or if We can be of further assis— tance. Sincerely, MAXFIELD & SOLOMONSON, INC. pal - Naucy ' A. P lm Gary S of onions on NAP /GMS : dl j Attachment r ti CONCLUSIONS AND RECO DMNDATIONS Demand Analy r Ma 1e�rood co u p led with continued economic The .rate of household growth for P � P as exceeded projections, makes construction of rental development which h P 435 to 445 units of in iable. Even though there are approximatley ho wa 8 v • proposed in the study area as summarized on Table , rental housing planned or p p sin demand is still unsatisfied as reflected in the Eno vacancy rate of only one percent. t of the current housing nt. A f ive percent vacancy rate is considered •- ce necessary for a healthy rental market to accommodate turnover, consumer choice • Therefore, ore in addition to the a nnua l demand of 80 and competitive rents. The , • growth, we see a need for another 185 units in units based on household g � The stud area will Maple wood to bring the vacancy rate up to five percent. y ' nits annually to accommodate need an additional 323 u y date projected household din other study area multi -famil housing is propose growth. Since little y se • wood should be able to capture a major portion comm�►unities , projects in Maple of demand that exists for housing in these other communities. Beaver Creek based on the concept and site and location, should be able to in fill one-half to two - thirds of its units . from additions demand Maplewood remaining one from in- migration within the study area. and the re g . The • employment centers within the study area. The primary draw will be from d s Roseville Little Canada and Vadnais Heights on secondary market area inclu e in this a strip g between H i g hwa y 36 and Interstate 694. Rental properties . . mete to a lesser extent than will those with a more northern corridor will cop the subject site. central or southern Maplewood orientation closer to J • and lack of new rental The demographics, low vacancy rates, housing and a tions in Maplewood indicate that Beaver Creek will not have s product Op n.. . P negative impact the market. More r ental housing is needed. Target Marke We have identified target five tar et markets for Beaver Creek: 1. Singles age 21 to. 45 2. Roommates age 21 to 45 3. Single parents age 23 to 45 Yo ung mar and cohabiting couples age 21 to 30 4. Yo g . 5. Empty nesters • s the p roduct proposed, attracting households who are s Tt1i8 reciter profile f it P P amenities for their curia -- conscious as well as those who want recreational e y . own use or for their guests. Market positionin • b the biggest draw for Beaver Creek The New construction rental units will a gS is mar ket unit m ix of both one and two bedroom units is appropriate for th 11 RESOLUTION RECITINE A PROPOSAL FOR A FINkNCING PROGRAM FOR A MULTI- FAMILY RENTAL }SOUSING DEVELOPMENT, GIVING PRELIMI 14ARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT AND THE PROGRAM, AND THE AMENDMENT OF THE HOUSING REVENUE BOND PROGR'-%MS PORTION OF THE CITY'S 462 HOUSING PLAN TO INCLUDE THE . PROGR UM PURSUANT. TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C, AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD TO ISSUE HOUSING REVENUE BONDS AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF THE FINANCING PROGRAM FOR THE PROJECT FOR APPROVAL TO THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCU14ENTS AND MATERIALS IN--CONNECTION WITH THE SAID PROJECT AND PROGRAM (BEAVER CREEK APARTMENTS PROJECT) IqH EREAS, (a) Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C Wic "Act) confers upon cities the power to issue revenue bonds to finance a program for thc� purposes of planning, administering, mad: ing or purchasing loans with respect to one or .more mult - fam housing developments within the boundaries of the c ity; (b) The City has received from Wa- shington Service Corporation, a Minnesota corporation ( the "Developer ") , a proposal that the City undertake a program to finance a Project hereinafter described, through the issuance of revenue bonds or obligations ('in one or more series or which may be in the foie of a single debt instrument) (the "Sands ") pursuant to the Act; (c) The City desires to: facilitate the development of rental housing within the ccliimunity; . encourage the development of of fordable housing opportunities for rein idents of the City; encourage the development. of housing facilities designed Attachment 5 12 for occupancy by persons of low or moderate income; and encourage the development of blighted or underutilized land and .structures within the boundaries of the City; and the Project will assist the City in achieving these objectives; (d) The City desires to expand the "Housing Revenue. Bond Programs" portion of its 462C Housing Plan to incorporate the program for the Project; (e) The Developer is currently engaged in the business of real estate development* The Project to be financed by the .Bonds . is the construction of 180 rental units consisting of 3 buildings of 60 rental units each; in the aggregate there will be 144 2-- bedroom units and a 180 space underground garage; in addition there will be a recreation building containing party rooms, weight rooms and meeting rooms and adjacent to the recreation buildings will be an out door swimming pool and.sun area (the Project ") (f) The Project will be on 29 acres of land at the northwest corner of the inter- section of Ivy Avenue and Ferndale Street; (g) The Project will result in the provision of additional rental housing opportunities to persons within the community; (h) The City has been advised by the Developer that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital costs of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the Project would be significantly reduced, but the Developer his also advised the City that with the aid of municipal financing, and resulting low borrowing costs, the Project is economically more' feasible; (i) A public hearing on the Project, the financing program and the amendment of the "Housing Revenue Bond Programs". portion 13 of the City's 462C Housing Plan therefor was held at p.m. on 1985, after notice was published, all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.05, subd. 5, at which public hearing all those appearing at said hearing who desired to speak were heard; (j) No public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly benefit financially from the Project. NOW THEREFORE,. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City P of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City hereby gives preliminary approval to the proposal P of the Developer that the City undertake the Project, described above, and the program of financing therefor, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter consisting of the ter 462C, consis pursuant to Mi P construction and equipping of multi-family rental housing facilities within the City pursuant to the Developer's s ueci f ications and to a revenue agreement between the City and a the Developer on such terms and conditions with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary, so as to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal and interest on the Bonds in a total principal amount of approx- Y imate1 $10,000 to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the construction and equipping of the Project; and said agreement ma also provide for the entire interest of the g may .also Developer therein to be mortgaged to the purchaser or purchasers of the Bonds, or a trustee for the holder( s) of the Bonds; and the City hereby undertakes preliminarily to issue its- bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions; 2. The "Housing Revenue Bond Programs" portion of the city's 462C Housing Plan. as herein proposed to be amended is hereby approved roved and adopted and the City Clerk is authorized and directed to submit the amended 462C Housing Plan to the - Metropolitan Council for its review and comment. The comments of the Metropolitan Council, if any, shall be submitted to the City Council for its consideration; 3 At the option of the Developer, the f inancing may be structured so as to take advantage of whatever means , are available and. are permitted by law to enhance the security for, or marketability of, the Bonds; provided that any such financing structure must be approved by the City; 14 4. on the basis of information available to the City, it appears, and the City hereby finds, that the Project constitutes a multifamily housing development within the meaning of subdivision 5 of Section 462C602 of the Act; that the Project will be primarily occupied, in part, by persons of low or moderate income'; that the avai labi 1 ity of the financing under the Act and the willingness of the City to provide such financing will be a substantial inducement to the Developer to undertake the Project, and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the provision of additional .multi family rental housing opportunities to residents of the City, to assist in the prevention of the emergence of blighted and marginal land and to promote more intensive development and use of land within the City; 5. The Project, and the program to finance the Project by the issuance of revenue bonds, is hereby given preliminary approval by the City subject to the approval of the f inancin program by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (the "MHFA ") and subject to final approval by the City, the Developer and the purchasers. of the Bonds as to ultimate details of the financing of the Project; 6. In accordance with subdivision -5 of Section , 46 2C . 0 5 , Minnesota Statutes, the Mayor of the City is hereby authorized and directed to submit the program. for financing the Project to the MHFA, requesting its approval, and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide the MHFA with preliminary information as it may require; . 7. The Developer has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project whether or not the Project is.carried to completion and whether or not approved by MHFA will be paid by the Developer; 8. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, is -authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Pro ' ect and the financing program therefor, to consult with the City Attorney, the City's fiscal consultant, Developer and purchasers of the Bonds (or trustee for the purchasers of_ the Bonds) as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms and provisions of the Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary documents and submit such documents to the City.for final approval; 15 9. Nothing in this Resolution or the documents prepared pursuant hereto shall authorize the - expenditure of any municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose. The Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or funds of the City except the revenue .and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall the City be subject to any liability thereon. The holder or holders of the Bonds shall never have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the outstanding principal on the Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereon against any property of the City. The Bonds shall recite in substance that the Bonds, including the interest thereon, are payable solely from the revenue and proceeds pledged. to the payment thereof* The Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation,* 10. In anticipation of the approval by the MHFA and the issuance of the Bonds to f finance all or a portion of the Project, and in order that completion of the project will not be unduly delayed when approved, the Developer is hereby authorized to make such expenditures and advances toward payment of that portion of the costs of the Project to be financed from the proceeds of . the Bonds, as the Developer considers necessary, including the use of interim, short -term financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Bonds if any when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the City. 1.1. The actions of the City Clerk in causing public notice of the public hearing and in describing the general nature of the Project and estimating the principal amount of the Bonds to be issued to finance the Project. is in all respects ratified and confirmed. 12. If construction of the Project is not started within one year from the date hereof, this resolution shall. thereafter have no force and effect and the preliminary approval herein granted is withdrawn. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota this th day of. , 19850 16 STATE OF MI NNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CI TY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk. of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HE REBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minu �es with the original thereof on file in my of fine, and that the same is a full,. true and complete transcript of the minutes .of a meeting of the City Council of said City duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to a resolution giving preliminary approval to a multi - family rental housing development project* WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this day of 1985. City Clerk (SEAL) 17 MEMORANDUM t TO: C Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Tax - Increment Financing (Beaver Lake /Battle Creek Areas) .Action by Council: DATE: January '16, 1985 Er.3 cis� f 1 Request Re J ED , c ±e . Give concept approval to a tax - increment financih(g pp authorize staff to have a proposal for a development. district prepa red . The Proposal r • Castle Design and Development Co., Inc. is requesting tax — increment financing to pay for a public cul -de -sac, utilities and emergency or their Beaver Creek apartment project. City staff. i access road f P s recommending that the following projects be included in this tax- increment project: 16 Funds to assist in the financing of the following projects: a. A water tower in the vicinity of Stillwater Avenue b. A water main from Larpenteur Avenue to the existing water main on Maryland Avenue, along McKnight Road. c. A water line in Hudson.Place, with an extension on Crestview Drive. These funds would be used to pay for the city's share of these costs and to keep assessments at a level that is comparable to similar projects and that can be sustained in court. 2. Funds`to purchase and improve the.Geranium Avenue park site.0 r nmrn gm n +- C Tax - increment financing can bean excellent tool for providing the that are necessary o make a project feasible or financing funds t Y public improvements that are difficult to finance through cdnventi.onal tools such as assessments. Tax - increment financing, however, should be used cautiously, because i t diverts taxes from the county and sc hool district which p pressure on them to raise their taxes. The argument can be made in this case, however, that this project would not be built without tax-increment financing (See enclosed . and school district would then receive little letter.) The c ount y income from this roperty. With tax- increment financing, the project P would be built and the county and school district would receive considerably more income after the bond i s paid off (approximately fifteen years) than they receive now from vacant land. Recommendation Give concept approval and authorize staff to prepare a development district proposal for the following projects: 1. A public cul -de -sac and utilities for the Beaver Creek apartment project, including an oversized water main to be extended through "Jim'.s Prairie." 2. An emergency access road for the Beaver Creek apartment project. 3. Funds to assist in the f inancing of the fol lowing projects: a. A water tower in the vicinity of Stillwater Avenue b. A water main from Larpenteur Avenue to the existing water main on Maryland Avenue, along McKnight Road c. A water line in Hudson Place, with an extension on Crestview Drive. These funds would be used to pay for the city's share of these costs and to keep assessments at a level that is comparable to similar projects and that can be sustained in .court . 4. Funds to purchase and improve the Geranium Avenue park site. BACKGROUND 1. Tax - increment financing uses the increase in taxes from a project to finance city approved improvements. In this case, the city would issue a general obligation bond to finance improvements. The increase in taxes that normally would go to the county, city and school district, woul.d be used to retire the bond. 2. The following are est im project-costs: a The McKnight Road water main and water tower: T.ax- increment financing: $1,000,000 Assessments: 853,000 Total project cost: $1,853,000 b. Hudson Place and Crestview Drive water main Tax- increment financing: .$ 112,500 Assessments: 97,500 Total project cost: $ 210,000 3. Geranium Avenue Park acquisition and improvements: $ 181,262 4. A public cul-de-sac, utilities and emergency access road, including an extension of the water main through ,Tim's Prairie: $ 380,000 mb Enclosure: Letter 14 ►� Design & Development Co. Inc. . 2 . 419 No. Margaret St. North St. Paul, MN 55109 Phone 770 -6138 December 11, 1984 Jeff Olson City Planner City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Ave. Maplewood, Mn. 55119 Re: Extension of Ivy Avenue Dear Jeff, As per our telephone conversation I am writing this letter to. explain the need for Tax Increment financing for the extension of Ivy Avenue to the East for approximately 1000 feet to service the proposed Beaver Creek Apartments. As I told you the soil in the proposed Right of Way varies from 4 feet of peat to a depth of 18 . feet, this of course calls for the removal of 20,000 yards of peat and replacing it with a good material. We of course would have to work in water thru -out the whole project, which will call for constant pumping. We, also being in contact with Public Works, have been requested to install a 16 inch water main where.. a 8 inch would suffice. The Public Works Dept. would like the larger line to be able to extend it to the North for future development. We feel with the prohibited cost of installing the street, curb and water /sewer would cause us to abandoned the project and we are asking the City of Maplewood to create a Tax Increment district and declare Ivy Avenue to be a Tax Increment project. This would assist us in writing down the cost of land improvements and make the Beaver Creek Apartments a reality. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. KDG:grs Q C. Tax - Increment Financing--Beaver Lake - Battle Creek Areas Secretary Olson said the request is for concept approval of . tax - increment financing and the .items to be included in the tax - increment package. Director of Public Works Haider further explained what improvements would be covered under this type of financing package. The improvements would be service. -area wide rather than to just aid properties along an individual street. The commission questioned why this type of financing was being used to Improve the Geranium Avenue park s and the park fund is not being used. Mr. Gervai s said the parks commission had indicated at their meeting they had already. committed .themselves to development and improvement of other parks. Director of - Public Works Haider said that the community services director indicated there was not sufficient funds in that neighborhood- park fund to improve the park. _ Commissioner Whitcomb moved the planning commission recommend the city council give concept approval and authorize staff to prepare a development district proposal for the following projects: 18 A public cul -de -sac and utilities for the Beaver Creek apartment project, including an oversized water main to be extended through Jim's Prairie. 2. An emergency access road for the Beaver Creek apartment project. 3. Funds to assist in the financing of the following projects: as A water tower i n. the vicinity of Stillwater Avenue b. A water main from Larpenteur Avenue to . the existing water main on Maryland Avenue. along McKnight Road. c. A water l i n e in Hudson Place. with an extension on Crestview Dri ve. These Tunds v�oul d be used to pay for the ci share of these costs and to keep. assessments at a level that is comparable to similar projects and that can be sustained in court. 4. Funds to purchase and improve Geranium Avenue park site. Commissioner Larson seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Barrett. E i 1 of son. Fischer. Larson. S1 etten Whitcomb r s TO FRO SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT /OWNERS: DATE Request - z- IL Action by c ounc i l: MEMORANDUM Rej City Manager Da Associate Planner -- Johnson Zone Change (R -2 to R -3) and Approval of a Double Dwelling in a Multiple Dwelling District 2800 to 2812 White Bear Avenue William Todd (2800 White Bear. Avenue) Francis Trepanier (2810 -12 White Bear Avenue) December 27, 1984 SUMMARY 1. Rezone the two properties at 2800 to 2812 White Bear Avenue from R -2, double dwelling to R -3, multiple dwelling. 2. Approve the double dwelling at 2800!,White Bear Avenue in an R -3, multiple dwelling zoning district. Reasons for the Request 1. The property owner at 2792 -96 White Bear Avenue complained to staff that the property at 2810 -2812 White Bear Avenue is.being i 1 -, egal ly used as a four - plex in an R - 2 zone. A rezoning to R -3 is rcguired t o make the four -plex legal. (Refer to the background section on page 3 . ) 2. William Todd joined in the application because he wants the opt- to expand his double dwelling to a three -plex. He believes zhe R -3 zoning will make his property niore marketable. Approval e double is needed because double dwellings require counc autn,�rization in an R -3 zone. Without this authorization, Mr. Todd's double dwelling would be a . nonconforming use. He could not expand his double dwelling without a conditional use permit, unless he created a triplex. (A triplex is permitted in an R-3 zone.) C'nmmc�n � c 2800 White Bear Avenue: Converting the double dwelling to a triplex would be compatible with the adjoining uses and the land use plan. Adding a third unit to the double dwelling would require another garage space and another outside parking stall* There may not be enough room on the site f or another exterior stall. The property owner may have to acquire land to the east or share parking with the four -plex to the north. Compliance with the density requirements will also require any expansion to be up or down. Three side -by -side units would exceed the permitted density. 2810 -12 White Bear Avenue: An R -3 zone would be consistent with the land use plan. In addition to the rezoning, two additional exterior parking stalls, must be provided and the windows in the . bedrooms of the two Tower units must. be enlarged to continue to use the structure as a four -plex. Recommendation I. Approve the enclosed resolution (page 10 ) , approving a rezoning from R -2, double dwelling to R -3, multiple dwelling for 2880 to 2812 White Bear Avenue. II. Approve the double dwelling use of 2800 White Bear Avenue in an R -3, multiple dwelling zone. 2 c BACKGROUND Site Description _ Size: .37 acres or 16,117.2 square feet (2800 White Bear Avenue) ..39 acres or 16,988.4 square feet (2810 -12 White Bear Avenue) .76 acres or 33,106 square feet Existing Land Uses: 1. 2800 White Bear Avenue - -a double dwelling constructed in 1963 and a double garage. 2. 2810 -12 White Bear Avenue - -a four -plex with three 2- bedroom units and a 1- bedroom unit, constructed in 1969 and a split- level, four -car garage. The building permit authorized a double dwelling. However, it was plumbed to accommodate four units, according to the plumbing permit. According to the applicant, it has been used as a four -plex since 1971 with the consent of the city's building official at that time. Surrounding Land Uses North: Radatz Avenue. Across the street is. undeveloped land planned for residential medium density use. E: single dwellings South: a three -unit townhouse structure West and northwest White Bear Avenue. Across the street, the property is planned for LSC, limited service commercial and SC, service commercial use. Two single dwellings and a four -story office building occupy the property. Past Actions y 10 This site: 10- 11 -62: Council approved a rezoning from F, farm residence to R-2, double d w e l l i n g . 2e The property to the south: 6- 18 -81: Council rezoned this .41 acre parcel from R -2, double 1 dwelling to R -3, multiple dwelling. This site was and is planned for RM, residential medium,density use. Planning 1. Land use plan designation: RM, residential medium density 2. Zoning: Present - -R -2, double dwelling Proposed - -R -3, multiple dwelling 3 C ` 3. Permitted density: 22 people /net acre 4o Existing density: 21.6 people /net acre with a density credit for landscaping. (See item 6D.) 5. Policies from the land use plan: The RM designation is designed for such housing types as single dwellings on small lots, two.- family homes, townhouses . and mobile homes. 6. Compliance with land use laws: A. Section 36 -485 requires four findings to approve a zone change. Refer to the resolution on page 10. B. Section 36 -7 states "in case any building or structure is erected, constructed, reconstructed, altered, repaired, converted or maintained or any building, structure or land is used in violation of this chapter or any regulations made pursuant thereto, the proper city authorities, in addition to other remedies, may institute any appropriate action or proceedings to prevent such unlawful erection, construction, reconstruction, alteration, repair, conversion, maintenance or use to restrain, correct or abate .such violation, to prevent the occupancy of said building, structures or land, or to prevent any illegal act, conduct, business, or use in or about such premises CO Section 36 -108 excludes double dwellings from R-3, multiple dwelling districts, except "where specifically authorized by the city council." D. Section 36 -11.4 (3) states that for purposes of calculating density, 100 square feet may be added to the net acreage for each dwelling unit where one percent of the construction. cost is allocated to the planting of trees.. The four -plex property qualifies for this credit. E. Section 36 -109 prohibits parking spaces in a driveway or I ther maneuvering area within five feet of a side . or rear yard property line or within the required thirty foot building setback and requires each space for rental units to be ten by twenty feet. 10 2800 White Bear Avenue - -If the structure were to be expanded to a three -pl ex , an additional exterior space and an additional garage space will be required. 2. 2810 -12 White Bear Avenue - -A maximum of two exterior spaces can be allocated to the existing blacktop areas. These are located in the southeast corner of the site, along the east property line. Public Works Both properties are served by sanitary sewer. 4 Building Offic and Fire Marshal In 1969, the city's building code permitted basement apartments ( section 7 -75 (18)) , pro.vided all windows were above grade and were in a ro ort ion of one -tenth of the room area. The basement units in P P 2810 -12 White Bear satisfy the above ground provision, but not the one -tenth ro ortion to room area provision. The life - safety code, P P which applies to new as well as existing structures, requires minimum exiting requirements from bedrooms. None of the bedrooms, but particularly those in the two lower units, comply with these codes. The city does not have the authority to vary from the state codes. Procedure 1. Planning recommendation 2. City council decision following a public hearing jw Attachments 1. Location map 2. Property line /zoning map 3, Maplewood Heights neighborhood land use plan map 4. P = 50 6. olution 5 R 3 8C L (s C) kR 3) 9C r7 'i F-i R2 F M I f F Q L 0 C mi 1. BC B � F BIC T . C 8 C Xi RS PUS R2 Cr 3C F F r R AA F Z ro R t R • f 3 L • PUD R F C • R lai F R 0.1 M w F de R _,, t - -_J ' LDC 9 C t" F R' R 78 .9 L R 3 1 Lac F R R AIL mi R M I SL L hi mi AA MC AV I I I M I R R :-BC) '/ + Fie! 11 R C R 0' R R rWE R, WE R F !F At# f4 A.; u I ; A" A•V ► Avi WA•, r W: IE [_ A R2 I� O ILI LOCATION MAP' Attachment 1 4 alIV P,1 26 • ao .al• o'fo ii• '7 02.0 • _" � TOM Iri' . Ogg q job Sf (F 79 .� 4• r` - �s` . L�� • . ... _ r !. 64 sc N • 78 i a7 . t� h 9 • ' ''� LT�•9b Q N '9�� . 5c 410 Aso Cr �g�; 50 s� a . 1. .tsar. : . �r ac o5 a.c • 1. : &C. 10 Sac. •G5at. .rcs4. •50 at. L N 1 man �r an 4 d - g 2836 = °' N --.-. 115 283 r 3 U �k5 .45 sc D9 O aoo SO O S ^ O 90• +40* too 2829 too, s oo' A(k ac .l2aC• .'?o sc 2811 C� �ZO 010 �� C S:�. Z 52 C Zt � 5� ._ ZE Mo. L T. Odc s iwP o' - � p �.�' L - lS 4.ta) 1004 Ito) i� t I UD f Office Building t.11 u. 1.06 ac. s • S4 ZC. 1 N o� �n 70 g 0 (47-) 040 0 ,, 1985 1995' e - �5 9 5 • 95' goo 130 ' 1 2 c' f in #:='`a'•� - 100• X40' 1fp' too g�•'� e i •,. a ?•� F• -• 2810- 2 , � b �, .dt ac. 4 at. — ,::._ 1984 �1% 2 0 '1976 6' • a ► 1990 2800:• , ., _ Gso X30 ► � 5? f 2792 -96 s� 9 9 JL 2778 '• A E OGE R a M OUT q 40% ' S 14 oS s �r PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 7 Attachment 2 4 N SIC Rm , interchange � �h��` 3ear L p rs 10 �i of arter�a� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlillillilljiiiiiiiilillI �� ma o � ter...- :�.,��_ M Rm CO 00 mayor col��torm. � PIN Pfiaplewood -Heigh * ts IdEIG11BO�?ElO0G LRt dD IJE 8 PLAN Attachment 3 4 N CITY OV MA PL EWOOD REZONING PETITION We petition the Maplewood City Council to rezone the attached described f ro m - ,- -.� to •' • property - - - -- z Written signature of any person's name on this petition is indication of th at erson' s understand in 9 of the proposed zone, the proposed location and p a endorsement for approval of such changeo If t t • 4. JV C �.� GL �� ,�' f o r�L C-1 .az K Lt-000 1 -�-�Y ► N � �� oR�y.S 61r P Tlz4c v 1 j"(W. � r, - tr Y 1-74 f a a el CrV Lpdld �Q�a r.? se e TP, ,"A A< li-40-100L ' I �fa 2 �/ � cf- rrl �✓SG h.J 9 Attachment 4 RA5/84 f Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of 1985 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, William Todd and Francis Trepanier initiated a rezoning. from R -2, residence district double dwelling to R -3, residence district multiple dwelling for the following- described property: Subject to White Bear Avenue and except the East feet and except the South 410 feet; all that part of the N 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of Section 2, Town 29, Range 22., lying East of the center line of White Bear Avenue and South of Radatz Avenue. And also; subject to White Bear Avenue and except the East 470 feet; the North 50 feet of the South 410 feet of the N 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of Section. 2', Town 29, Range 22, lying East of c/1 of White Bear Aven ` This property is also known as 2800 and 2810 -12 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood.; WHEREAS the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated Trepanier. pursuant to Chapter 36, of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed Commission on January 7, 1985. The the city council that said rezoning by William Todd and Francis Article VII of the Maplewood Code by the Maplewood Planning planning commission recommended to be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 1985 to consider this rezoning.. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to. be heard and present written statements, The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: ` 1. The proposed change is consistent with the.spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code, provided that the parking and window area requirements are met. � A 4- kmr% n + r. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare. 40 The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection • and schools. Adopted t h i s day of , 19850- Seconded by Ayes- - STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of 1985 with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this rezoning request. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1985. City Clerk City of Maplewood. 11 B. Rezoning-2800-12 White Bear Avenue (Trapanier/Todd) 1 r The planning commission moved the following resolution be approved by the city council: . WHEREAS, William Todd and Francis Trepani er initiated a rezoning from R residence district doubt e ' dwel 1 i ng to R -3, residence district multiple dwelling for the following-described property: Subject to White Bear Avenue and except the East 570 feet and except h p the South 410 feet; all that part of the N 112 of the SW 1/4; of Section 2, Town 29, Range 22, lying East of the center line of White Bear Avenue and south of Radatz Avenue. And also; subject to White Bear Avenue exce P t the East 470 feet; the North 50 feet of the South 410 feet of the N 112 of the SW 1/4 of Section 2, Town 29, Range 22, lying east of the center • line of White Bear Avenue. This property is also known as 2800 and 2810 -12 White Bear Avenue Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by William Todd and Francis Tre ani er pursuant P p to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on January 7, 1985. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code, provided that the parking and window area requirements are met. -2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the 'nei ghborhood, and that the use. of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change, will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare, 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. MEMORANDUM y TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: DATE: City Manager Associate Planner -- Johnson Rezoning (BC to NC) 20$6 Edgerton Street City of Maplewood Ronald S. Rygwalski January•24, 1985 Action by Council: Endorse ado di f i e d___ Rejected_._. F -3 On January 14, 1985 counci 1 directed staff to prepare a resolution to rezone this property from BC, business commercial to N'C, - neighbor- hood commercial rather than R -2, residence district (double dwelling) as - recommended by the planning commission. The revised resolution and the November 7, 1984 staff report are enclosed.' jw Attachment Resolution November 7, 1984 staff report Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the 11th day of February, 1985 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business commercial to NC, neighborhood commercial for the following - described property: Lot 12, Thiede' s Edgerton Villas, Section 17, Township 29, Range 22 This property is also known as 2086 Edgerton Street, Maplewood; 'WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on November 19, 1.984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said property be rezoned to R -2, residence district (double dwelling) . 30 The Maplewood City Council held'a public hearing on February 11, 1985 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published.and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is.consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. .2.. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of . the property adjacent. to the area included in the proposed change or plan.-is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such.as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Adopted this .11th day of February, 1985. Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MA PL EWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the 11th day of February, 1985 with the original on file in my office and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this rezoning. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1985. City Clerk City of Maplewood MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: DATE: City Manager Associate Planner, Johnson Zone Change (BC to R-2) 2086 Edgerton Street City of Maplewood Ronald S Rygwa l s k i November 7, 1984 SUMMARY Request Downzone this property from BC, business commercial to R -2, d w e l l i n g . i ng . Reason for this Request This site is part of the city -wide down - zoning program. The RL, residential lower density land use plan and BC, business commercial .zoning designations are incompatible. The proposed change is to give a clear signal as to how the city desires the property to be used. Comments This is predominantly a lower density residential neighborhood. The BC zoning on this site should be changed to a residential designation to control any expansion of the existing use. This action would be consistent with the land use plan policy of "maintaining and, where possible, strengthening the character of individual neighborhoods." As a legal nonconforming, use the business use of the site could not be expanded or changed to a more intensive use without council approval. Downzoning the s i t e would a l s o move toward eventually the property into conformance with another land use plan policy of having dissimilar, uses abut along rear property lines where possible so that like uses front one another, Expansion of the single d w e l l i n g s would continue to require council approval until one of the dwellings is removed. When downzoning a property, council should grant the property owner a zoning classification that permits the most flexibility for using the site consistent with the land use.plan and the location of the site. In this case, this would be the R -2, double dwelling district. The. site's frontage on an arterial roadway and proximity to land planned for residential medium density use make t h i s a suitable s i t e for the R -2 classification. Single dwellings are a permitted use in the R -2 district. The property owner would prefer to retain the BC zoning but as long as the business use of the property can be continued, he will not object to this proposal. Recommendation Approve the enclosed resolution .(page 8) , approving a downzoning from BC, business commercial to R -2 double.dwelli.ng fo'r.2086 Edgerton Street. BACKGROUND il Site Description Size: 100 x 475 feet ( above water) or 47,500 square feet Existing Use: Two single dwellings, a gas station /small engine sales and service business, a residential garage and a 41 x 28 foot metal storage building. Surrounding Land Uses North and South: single dwellings East: Oehrline's Lake West: Edgerton Street.. Across the street is a single dwelling History of the Site 1. The oldest zoning map on record is dated 1959. The property is zoned for BC, business commercial use on that map. The gas station has supposedly been in operation since the 1930 2. 10- 16 -79: A building permit was issued for a 16 x 32 foot addition to the east side of the gas station. 3o 3-31-81: A building permit was issued to expand the metal storage building from 16 x 28 feet to 41 x 28 feet. Past Actions 9- 12 -83: Council rezoned the Maplewood Plumbing site (1690 English Street) from BC to NC, neighborhood commercial. The existing structure could not be further expanded and NC use of the property is compatible with the location.. 10- 22 -84: Council rezoned two adjacent properties east of County Road B and McMenemy Street from BC to R 7 1, single dwell in.g. The existing office buildin g was found to be incompatible with this location Downzoning to R -1 was chosen to classify the use as nonconforming, requiring council approval for any proposed expansion of the office use. 11 -5 -84: The planning commission recommended downzoning of the Brooks Superette property (2150 McMenemy Street) from BC to NC for the same reasons sited in the 9 -12 -83 above. Planning 19 Land use plan designation: RL, residential lower density. 2. Zoning: Present - -BC, business.commercial; Proposed - -R -2 double dwelling. 3. Policies from the plan: a. Page 18 -29: The RL land use classification is primarily designated for single dwellings. An occasional double dwelling may be allowed. b. Page 18 -5: Whenever possible, changes in types of land use shall be along rear property lines so that similar uses front on the same street, c. Page 18 -2: Zoning maps should be updated as necessary to make both land use maps and zoning maps compatible. d. Page 18 -3: Maintain and where necessary, strengthen the character of individual neighborhoods. 4. Compliance with land use laws: a. Section 36 -485 requires four findings for approval of a zone change. Refer to the findings in the resolution on page 10. b. Refer to page 9 for a list of the uses permitted in the BC district. c. Section 36 -24 states "no building shall hereafter be placed upon a single lot so that there shall be a dwelling house in the rear of another building with the same frontage, except by special permission by the governing body." d. Section 36 -69 (lot dimension) states that "Every building designed and erected in an R -1 district for the housing of one family, together with. its accessory buildings, shall be located on a building site of not less than 10,000 square feet in area." e. Section 36 -17 states the requirements that apply to nonconforming uses. In this case, the commercial use of the property and two single dwellings on the same lot would become legal nonconforming uses. The code requirements are as follows: "(1) Any unlawful use of a building or- land existing at the effective date of any provision of this chapter may be continued although such use does not conform to such provision of this chapter. (2) The substitution of one nonconforming use for another nonconforming use may be permitted by the city council by special use permit, as provided in Article III of this chapter; provided that, such nonconforming use is determined by the city council to be of the same or more restrictive nature as the original conconforming use.. Whenever a nonconforming use of a building or land has been changed to a use of a more restrictive classification or to a conforming use, such use shall not thereafter be changed to a use. of a less restricted classification. r (3) A nonconforming. building wholly or partially destroyed by fire, explosion, flood or other phenomenon, or legally condemned, may be reconstructed and used for the same nonconforming use; provided that, building reconstruction shall be commenced within one year from the date the building _ was destroyed or condemned and shall be carried on without interruption. (4) If a nonconforming use of . a building or land is. voluntarily abandoned and ceases for a continuous period or one year or more, subsequent use of such building or land shall be in conformity with the provisions of this chapter. (5) No existing building or premises devoted to a use not permitted in the district in which such building or premises is located shall be enlarged, reconstructed or structurally altered, unless: (a } Required by law or government order; or (b There would not be a significant affect, as determined by the city through a special use permit, on the development of the parcel as zoned. (6) The city council may permit, through the issuance of a special use permit, as provided in Article III of this chapter,, the extension of a nonconforming use throughout those parts of a building which were manifestly designed or arranged for such use prior to the date when such use of such building became nonconforming, if no structural alteration, except those required by law, are made. (7) No nonconforming use shall be extended to displace a conforming use. (8) An accessory building which is caused to be noncon- forming, due to an amendment to the zoning code, may be expanded if the following conditions are met: (a) The building is zoned properly.. (b) The building was a conforming structure prior to the effective date of Ordinance No. 488 (June 12, 1980)* (c) All presently applicable building code require- ments are met. (d) All portions of said.structure are on the applicant's property. (e) Runoff from the overhang of said structure is not adversely affecting an adjacent property. (f) Any proposed building addition shall be made away from side and rear lot lines. A Citizen Comments 4 Seventeen property owners within 350 feet of this property were asked their opinion of this proposal. Fourteen responses were received; five wanted the business to remain at this location, one respondent had no comment and eight support the proposal. Procedures 1. Planning Commission recommendation 2. City council decision following a public hearing mb Attachments 1. Location map 2. Property line /zoning map 3. Parkside land use plan map 4. BC zoning district 5. Resolution I { 4J v rk V C/ TY OF R B G ST. PAUL F" K I R3 . LAKE 1� E7J i - R F Cl V _ c p• R BC Idt t IT F i OF L /TT — ' ' LE CAN,40A R F � ; I R % � I F '+ ' tR: LA I NI\PR F ac •R ' • ou - T Q ,O N - I _ •^ ` `. • _ + I a 91 or C 4 -` • Pit I _ Ir 4. 1 r ^ 21 0 ~ 't < 2160 E3 Fi" 11 7 __ --- Iry ,• .y . Pond ti w Dwelling ! = e Somme �►� 2094 l - -,► ,., OE INE 5 CO ' 70 •• :•'•''''' V 1 c 0 23 S STAT1 ON - .� Storage Building , 2075 + 2074 _ 4 -I. Z. fb Le Undeveloped Land' v C Q h ` No IK-L WASIP ♦ • ti w E 0 � ^ �, ca _ I t ,2 0 41•� 4L C PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP . Proposed Zone Change 7 Attachment Two 4 N v � PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP . Proposed Zone Change 7 Attachment Two 4 N Y ro ma c 1�c or��.- ..QS _ - -_ - -. -M J - - r `.� • -. %Tv 0:0&; interchange - 0 1 r - —' A Inc , , I ana Pal art tnterchzn e - - g C. Rl I C S lCou LS( r –- interchange =- i minorhjt<<< R 3w S S ---; dM R M� - . Nova on interchange major arterial La ' khte.ur M L u � W R o S e. VJ n Rh F LSC r� tD 2 i-- Parkside NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN 8 Attachment Three Q N Sec. 36 -1 Use regulations. In a BC Business and Commercial District in the city, the follow- ing regulations shall apply: (1) Permitted arses: A building may b erected or used, and a lot ma }T be used or occupied, for an of the follow purposes, and no other: (a) Apartment for one family in combination with business i use. - (b) Hotel, motel, lourisi Ifor rooming house or l ►UaT Us ing- house. (c) Re tail store, restaurant, office, ar studio, 1) n.l:, personal ervice and craftsmen's shop, mort (d) Automobile sales agency that sells nev. cars or new and used cars, pa garage or lot, prc►1 ided all facil ides are located and all �,er-% are conducted on the lot. (e) Newspaper publishing, job printing establishment. (f) Theater. (g) Hand or automatic self- serVice laundr (h) Bakery or confectionery shop, for the production of ar- ticles t.o be sold only at retail on the premises. (1) Public garage or motor fuel station; provided that a license to operate such business is first obtained from the city council pursuant t.o chapter 17 of this Code. All public garages and motor fuel stations must be so lo- cated on the site and the site shall be of- the size as provided in section 36 -1 '0 of this division which defines kinds of operation, site area required and other data relating to such business. 0) Any use of the same general character as an}• of the above permitted uses; provided that, no use which is noxious or hazardous shall be permitted. 9 Attachment Four Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of 1984 at 7. p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business commercial to R -2, residence district (double dwelling) for the following - described property: Lot 12, Thiede's Edgerton Villas, Section 17, Township 29, Range 22 This property is also known as 2086 Edgerton Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on November 19, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be . .3 . , The Maplewood City Counc i l held a public hearing on 1984 to consider t h i s rezoning. Notice thereof was publ i shed and mailed pursuant to law. A11 persons present at said hearing were given an..opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPL`EWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact.:- 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the. area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where. applicable and the public welfare. 10 Attachment Five 4 . The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities., such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Adopted this day of , 1984* Seconded by Ayes- - STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of , 1984 with the original on file in my office, and the sane is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar a the same relates to . this rezoning. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1984. City Clerk City of Maplewood. 11 B. Rezoning: 2086 Edgerton Secretary Olson said the proposal is to downzone this propert p p y from BC, bus commercial to R -2, double dwelli Ronald Rygwalski said the ro ert has been comme ' P P y c i a l s � nce 1930 s. the property has been well maintained. He questioned why a license was issued on Sunrise Drive to operate garage. The zone change would eliminate his business and the . use of the property as a business b y his s-on. Staff reviewed the regulations outlined - i n the code for continuation of this business. Mr. Rygwal ski questioned if the use could be expanded to include ude a r in the future. P sto Secretary Ol son A ndi cated that would be expansion i on p of the use and would require approval of the city counci Mr. Rygwalski said he would like something in writing that he will be -able to keep p and may nta� n his business, ness. �ecretary O1 son said h t�he • . t code does give the right to continue bus IpnZ ess i t is discontinued for one year, then it would revert ba k to 4 � . zoning. V� •T 2 11 -19 -84 Commissioner Pe l l i sh moved the P 1 ann i ng commission recommend the ci counc adopt . the following resolution: WHEREAS, the Ci of M initiated a . rezoning from BC, business c ommerc ial to R -2, residence district (double dwelli for the f olJ owi ng- described property: Thiede s Edg erton Villas, Section 17, Township 29. Rang' 22 dot 12. . _ ihi s property i s also known as 2086 Edgerton. Street, Maplewood; �. WHEREAS. the procedural hi story of this rezoni is as follows: 1. Th.i s rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood.." pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VI I of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoni n g was y reviewed b the Maplewood Planning Commission on November r 19 1984. The p commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be approved, N OW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: g 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit purpose and intent of the zoni ng code 2 The proposed than g a will not substantially injure or detract from , the u neighboring use of nei hbori n property or from the character of the neighborhood, the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed and that p P change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences op of the community, where applicable and the public welfare. - n would ne gative effect upon the logical, ha no ne 4, The proposed cha g effic ent , and economi cal , extension of public services and f a c i l i t i e s , such. _ as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Commissioner ones Sl etten seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Barrett. Fischer, Larson, Pel l ish, Sigmundi k. Sletten Nays -- Commissioner Robens MEMORANDUM TO: FROM SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: Request SUMMARY Do.t City Manager Associate Planner -- Johnson Plan Amendment (RL to LSC) and Rezoning (BC to NC) 2150 McMenemy Street City of Maplewood Action by Council: J. Brooks Hauser Brooks Superette, Inc. Endorsed-._.�_ October 19, 1984 Vodi fie� 1. Amend the land use plan from RL, residential low density to LSC, limited service commercial for the Brooks Superette at 2150 McMenemy Street. 2. Rezone the Brooks Superette property from BC, business commercial to NC, neighborhood commercial. Reasons for the Request This site is part of the city -wide downzoning program. The RL, land use plan and BC zoning designations.are incompatible. A change in either, or both, should be made to give a clear signal as to how the city desires. the property to be used. The NC zone was specifically designed for this type of site. It recognizes the long- standing commercial use of the property, but limits its use to neighborhood service uses that are compatible with a residential area. (Council recently approved similar rezonings for Maplewood Plumbing (1690 English Street) and Forest Products Supply (1915 Castle Avenue) . The site across the street was recently rezoned from BC to R -1, rather than NC, because a large part of .the site is undeveloped. An NC zone would have allowed a significant commercial .expansion. This is, not the case with the Brooks Superette site. Rezoning to R -1 would restrict the site to the existing grocery store or a single dwelling. If the existing grocery business failed, it may not be. feasible to destroy the existing building and rebuild a single dwelling. The building would then become a vacant eyesore. Recommendation (At least four votes in favor are required for approval.) 1. Repeal the . R -1 zoning approved on December 1 0 , 1984 2. Approve the enclosed resolutions (pages 11 and 12) amending the land use plan from RL to LSC and re zoning from BC to NC, on the basis that:. a. This site has been used commercially since the early 1960's. b. The NC zone was designed for neighborhood commercial uses. C-4 The site is on the corner of two collector streets. do The city recently approved rezonings from BC to NC in two other similar situations. 2 BACKGROUND Site Description Size: 100' x 121' = 12,100 square feet Existing land use: Brooks Superette. The building contains about 2,400 square feet. History of the Use According to Keith Carlson with the Brooks firm, this building was. constructed in the early 1960's fora convenience grocery store. The Brooks firm purchased it around 1965 and has operated it as the present superette since that time. Surrounding Land Uses North: County Road B. an.d a single dwelling. East and south: single dwellings West: McMenemy. Street and single dwellings. Past Actions Between 1966 and 1969: This site was rezoned from R -1, single dwelling to BC, business commercial. 9-12-83: Council rezoned the Maplewood Plumbing site (1690 English Street) from BC to NC. 2- 13 -8.4: Council rezoned the Forest Products Supply site (1915 Castle Avenue) from BC to NC. 10- 22 -84: Council rezoned the two lots to the north from BC to R -1. Pl 10 Land use plan designation: present - -RL, residential low density; proposed - -LSC, limited service commercial. 2. The LSC, limited commercial center classification refers to commercial facilities on a neighborhood scale. Heavy industrial uses, department stores,'motels, auto accessory stores, etc. would be prohibited, while other land uses of a medium intensity nature would be permitted subject to meeting certain performance standards. 3. Zoning: present - -BC, business commercial and R -1, single dwelling; proposed - -NC, neighborhood commercial. The south 21 feet is zoned R -1, but is used as - a required setback area for the superette. 4 Refer to page 9 for a l i s t i n g of the uses permitted in the NC district. 5. Section 36 -485 requires four findings for the approval of a zone change. Refer to findings one through four in the resolution on page 11 for these findings. 6. Refer to page 10 for a l i s t i n g of the uses permitted in the BC zoning district. 7. If this site is rezoned to R -1, the superette would become a legal nonco orming use and the following city ordinances would apply (Section 36 -17) : a. Any lawful use. of a building or land existing at the effective date of any provision of this. chapter may be continued although such use does not conform to such provisions of t h i s chapter. b'. The substitution of one nonconforming use for another nonconforming use may be permitted by the city council by special use permit as provided in Article III of this chapter; provided that, such nonconforming use is determined by the city council to be of the same or more restrictive nature as the original nonconforming use. Whenever a nonconforming use of a building or land has been changed to a use of more restrictive classification or to a conforming use, such use will not thereafter be changed to a use of a less restricted classification. C* A nonconforming building wholly or partially destroyed by fire, explosion, flood or other phenomenon, or legally condemned, may be reconstructed and used for the same nonconforming use; provided that, building reconstruction shall be commenced within one year from the date the building was destroyed or condemned and shall be carried on without interruption. d. If a nonconforming use of a building or land is voluntarily abandoned and ceases for a continuous period of one year or more, sub se q uent use of such building or. land shall be in conformity with the provisions of this chapter. e. No existing building or premises devoted to a use not permitted in the. district in which such building or premises is located shall be enlarged, reconstructed or structurally altered, unless: (1) Required by law or government order; or ( 2 ) There would not be a s i g n i f i c a n t affect as determined by the city through a special use permit, on the deelopment of the parcel as zoned. Citizen Comments Forty -seven property owners within 350 feet of this property were asked their .: opinion of this proposal. Of the nineteen .persons who responded, seven were in favor of the proposal and twelve were opposed 4 Those opposed want the land use plan lef t as is and the superette property down- zoned to single dwelling on the basis that: 10 The new Cub store may cause the Brook's store to convert to a commercial use less compatible with the neighborhood. 2. The grounds and building are unkept. 3. Enough businesses in the area. 4. Traffic problems at the corner. 50 Hangout for kids because of vide o games . 6. Rodents sighted near the building, Environmental Health The city has not had any complaints on Brooks Superette since a garbage - complaint was received in 1979. A recent inspection found no evidence of rodents nor ' any other problems with the exterior, Procedure 1. Plan amendment a. Planning commission recommendation following a public hearing b. City council decision 2. Rezoning a. Planning commission recommendation b. City council decision following a public hearing mb Attachments 1. Location map 2. Property line /zoning map 3. Parkside neighborhood land use plan (present) 4. NC uses 5. BC uses 6. Resolution (plan amendment) 70 Resolution (zone change) 8. Appl i cant's letter v 58 � C LARK I►VE� . ViKIN j V o �g I LITTLE CANADA au RD. j b _j ' 35 t K 25 M 25 CO UNT SURKE AV, EL ORS GE r+ E ev Sond ULMON EELMOKT LOI�'e EKI t t� AV 58 SKILLMAN Ak �- fA W r "fw � c � KILLWAN AVE � a M N h t = j �' W t VER AVE. < o t r MT. C m W 0 MT. VERNON AVE I � °►�' J DOWNS AVE. y W, VE � 60 I x ° I 26 1 It O S EL AWN c AVE. uj I s E L.lr 000 aV. I LWOOD AVE. SELL,c cc h Fs u wWE R AVE .4 FEN TON AVE44 O II s J O !� �t1� F- ►- sr _ so A RSPLEY AV L _ C T W bi a __W� =� S ~ < I)- KIN TON ~ = z c �' 1 XING �I VON AV E. � t t p 1 Z J �� " �,�� ° a' AVE 4 e ! w a o 30 < } 3 F1 F1 SS Air 57 . ST. PAUL LOCATION MAP Attachment One 4 N 1 0 ' o 1 O C : tit ! �� t►�C _ J > 1 [ at 4b t _ , I r I I r k i i 4001 1 014 'eel t, • I N (n `-�.; s 13 f - . _ 1 ! � 3) ' �.-►: C. T, • '1 r. IC?O 1�� c. ��a w:. S i Ioct 1M 5►� 9 IOC! 1: L AURI E A9� ^, P L wr• r n i . • .. ) { s L I S ) — 3 8) 1 • ° 1 �' r1 C • • °• 1" _ J; 46) fill office f 3$ Z 7 r , , Little Canada - T. 4 . 7 1 j - ' �_ L3 3 _J 3 359 4 4 r. V t I'%, s it nnnnI /r~ rI Inrnr'T rL _ TL . - L UU j >c Re b o ac, - - IG2 120 T7 3 7 73 Lr _ ,bi &C. .52 ac 52K 5Z•• C9 U . i �L 0 5 �3) +ul (1 J c 6°j , C' arc.. S 1 41 t � o50 . - I is� i r' 33a' 3z-4 -4 I t • at . � t 2.. G 3 ac . n. a J t 0 � 2�Lar- Its m 300' �• aL0 • _5 ac r 37 t • �.-- _ , t _ 13}4 . 99 [. 5 � •�.� s V a 80 bo j 80 so, ioo 80 Fr so � " 6�1 ' t 2 '��, 3 4 5 '"� 1 Z 3 I .rte Z Z 1 — _ (,pAq .\4 G r so B 80 8 So L L.. D r\ j AS .S ' 663 r .... • • . t t -- tr _ _ PROPERTY /ZONING MAP Attachment Two N �in#erchange rrnci � {� pad arterial ��_i_ interchange -� - i dame I ' 1 1 r3 C wa or c lector - .� � Ii, s . ,� i . . QS - --� -� ; i = C rr Ilk i �• , . __�_ R h S C _interchange /cy.�..., -+.•x — � mayor arteria LSC n t 3� .i n O f i i i io [_ n t +.l E C G e C � — •--+- �_ I t I l l O - • o Y ..._ LSC L - 7, w . . . ......... .. r - AV • _ -� �• � � irk interchane — mayor coliectorm--� .,! C , - RH �X . I CD LAMI _ 3 Parkside NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN (Present) Attachment Three � 36-126 ' MAPLEWOOD CODE DIVISION 5.5. NC NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCL DISTRICT Sec. 36-126. Intent. i ntent district is to reserve land for the use of The Intent of P businesses than are compatible with adjacent residential lan d uses. Uses are limited to offices and smaller retail uses that cater to convenience shopping. Pedestrian and bicycle access are to be emphasized. Sec. 36-127. Permitted uses. following -ided that the floor area of all Any of the g uses P roe any g buildin s in one N C zone shall not exceed three thousand _ � (3,000) square feet: 1 Bal or candy shop for the production of goods sold on the premises. (2) Beauty parlor or barber shop. (3) Dry cleaner or laundromat. All odors must be controlled so as not to be noticeable to adjacent residents. j (4) Office or medical and dental clini ex ce p t (5) Repair t for motorized vehicles. No work shall p be performed outside of the building. (6) Drug, hardware or grocery store. (7) Studio. (8) Tailor or dressmaker shop. gr ooming (9) Veterinary or clinic where there . are not outside kennels or storage. • Sec. 3& - 129. Conditional uses (requires council approval). Any of the following uses provided that the floor area of all • buildings in any one NC zone shall not exceed eight, thousand (8,000) square feet: (1) Any permitted use listed in section 36 -127. (2) Club, lodge or ball. (3) Private school, daycare center or community serNrice use. (4) Taxi stand or bus stop. (5) Restaurant where there are no drive - up order windows or serving of food to patrons in their automobiles. All cooking odors must be controlled so as not to be noticeable to adja- cent residents. (6) Similar uses to those listed in this section. 9 Attachment Four Sec. 36 -153. Use regulations. In a BC Business and Commercial District.in the city, the follow- ing regulations shall apply: (1) Permitted uses: A building may be erected or used, and a lot may be used or occupied, for any of the following purposes, and no other: (a) Apartment for one family in combination with business use. - i (b) Hotel, motel, tourist home, rooming house or boarding- house. (c) Retail store, restaurant, office, agency, studio, bank, personal service and craftsmen's shop, mortuary. (d) Automobile sales agency that sells new cars or new and used cars, parking garage or lot, provided all facil- ities are located and all services are conducted on the lot. (e) Newspaper publishing, job printing establishment. (f) Theater. (g) Hand or automatic self - service laundry. (h) Bakery or confectionery shop, for the production. of ar- ticles to be sold only at retail on the premises. (i) Public garage or motor fuel station; provided that a license to operate such business is first obtained from the city council pursuant to chapter 17 of this Code. All public garages and motor fuel. stations must be so lo- cated on the site and the site shall be of the size as provided in section 36 -156 of this division v,lhich defines kinds of operation, site area required and other data relating to such business. 0) Any use of the same general character as any of the above permitted uses; provided that, no use which is noxious or hazardous shall be permitted. 10 Attachment Five WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the comprehensive Maplewood plan from RL, residential low density to LSC, P P • limited service commercial for 2150 McMenemy Street WHEREAS the P rocedural history of this plan amendment is as 101 lows 10 This plan amendment was initiated by the City of Maplewood. 2, The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 5, 1984 to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed P ursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written state planning ments. The lannin commission recommended to the city council that said plan amendment be approved* 3. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on 1984. The council considered reports and recommend- ations from the planning commission and city staff. NOW r THEREFORE � BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The site is on the corner two collector streets. 20 The city recently approved - two similar plan amendments at 1915 Castle Avenue and 1690 English Street. 3.This site has been used commercially since the early 1960's. Adopted this day of ,1984. Seconded by Ayes -- 11 attachment six Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called And held in the council chambers in said city on the day of , 1984 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business commercial to NC, neighborhood commercial for the northerly 140 feet of the following- described property: The North 154 feet of the West one (1) acre of the North half of the North h a l f (N 1/2 of N 1/2) of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest q uar ter (NW 1/4 of NW 1/4) of Section 17, Township 29 North, Range. 22 West, Village of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, subject to the rights of the public in the North 33 feet thereof and the West. 33 feet thereof, for road purposes, according to the United States Government Survey thereof. This property is also known as 2150 McMenemy Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on November 5, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on , 1984 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed P ursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEW40D CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare.. 12 attachment seven 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical .extension of public services and facilities., such as public water., sewers, police and.fire protection and schools. 5. This site has been used commercially since the early 1960's. , 60 The NC zone was designed for neighborhood commercial uses. T, The site is on the corner of two collector streets, 8. The city recently approved rezonings .from BC to NC in two other, similar situations. Adopted this day of , 1984. Seconded by Ayes- - STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF, MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of 1984 with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar . as the same relates to this rezoning, witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1984. City Clerk City of Maplewood. 13 BROOKS SUPERETTES, INC. t January 10, 1985 The Honorable John Greavu Mayor, City of. Maplewood Members of the Maplewood City Council 1902 E. County Rd. B Maplewood, MN 55109 RE: Brooks Superette 2150 McMenemy Street Dear Mayor Greavu and City Council Members: The purpose of this letter - memorandum is to request that you reconsider the City Council action of December 10, 1984, which action rezoned the Brooks Superette (the Superette) at 2150 McMenemy Street (the Property) from BC, business commercial to R -1, residential low density. On January 4, 1985, we delivered to .the City a letter formally requesting this reconsideration and an opportunity to submit to the City Council this letter that addresses the concerns and objections of Brooks Superettes, Inc. (BSI) to this downzoning of its property. This downzoning results in the Superette's becoming a non- conforming use at this location. The Property is unfairly and unnecessarily penalized as a result of this nonconforming status. BSI will suffer great financial loss because the Property has been arbitrarily and unreasonably downzoned. The downzoning is not needed in order to insure good planning for the area. FACTS A. Site History The Superette was constructed as a conforming.use in the BC, business commercial district. A building permit was issued on June 28, 1967, for a 60' by 40' building for use as a dairy - convenience store. The Superette has operated as a conforming use since that time. The City has no record of any complaints regarding the Superette or operation of this EXECUTIVE OFFICES: 4900 NORTH COUNTY ROAD 18, SUITE 303, NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA 554.28 /.612-537.2787 City of Maplewood January 10, 1 Page 2 B. Zoning Hi story p y The Property was rezoned from R -1, low density residential to BC business commercial in 1966 or 1967. Convenience stores were and continue to be a conforming use in the BC, business commercial district. 71 1983 the City created the NC, neighborhood commercial In July y zoning onin classification. This zoning classification was designed to conform to LSC, limited service commercial land use desi nation � to permit commercial land uses that are compatible g with residential land uses. Maplewood.Code Section 36 -126. Uses in th e NC district are limited to offices and smaller retail uses that serve residential convenience shopping needs. Office of Communi In October 1984 the City Y Development proposed to downzone the Property from BC, business commercial to NC, neighborhood hborhood commercial and to amend the Comprehensive Plan land use designation from RL, low density residential to LSC, limited service commerc The P P ur ose of this zoning change was to permit the long - standing ne convenience store use of the Property, but limit. the use of the Property to neighborhood service uses that are com- patible with a residential area. The purposes and uses permuting the NC neighborhood commercial district are more restrictive than 9 g those in the BC, business commercial district. The office of Community Development had been i.n communication with representatives of BSI regarding the downzoning from BC, business commercial to NC, neighborhood commercial. Keith Carlson of BSI had told the Office of Community Development that although BSI wanted the existing BC zoning to continue, BSI would not object to the P P ro osed downzoning from BC to NC because it at least would not become a nonconforming use. On November 5 1984 the Planning Commission considered both the Comprehensive , amendment from RL, low density residential to LSC limited service commercial and the rezoning from BC, business commercial to NC, neighborhood commercial. The Planning Commission meeting as also a public ..hearing on the Comprehensive Plan amend- g p d the Plannin meet . The record re one neighbor . addre s s e g Commission regarding these proposed changes. On a unanimous vote, g g P the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council the approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment from RL, residential low density to LSC, limited service commercial and the rezoning 1r-, City of Maplewood January 10, 1985 Page 3 from BC, business commercial to NC, neighborhood commercial. A representative of BSI was present at the meeting. On December 10, 1984, the City Council considered the recommenda- tions of the Planning Commission and staff held a public hearing on the rezoning from BC, business commercial to NC, neighborhood commercial. Keith Carlson of BSI was in attendance at this meetin g express to ex the position that BSI did not object to this downzoning to NC, neighborhood commercial as a compromise. Mr. Carlson did not object to this downzoning based on reliance of conversations with City staff, the planning report to the Council (attached as Exhibit A), the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and the official notice to downzone to NC. The City Council, contrary to its official published notice which stated" that the proposed rezoning to be considered was from BC to NC and contrary to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and staff, took action to downzone the property from BC, b u s i n e s s commercial to R -1, low density residential. Because Keith Carlson had believed that the only possible rezoning was from BC to NC because of the prior action of the Planning Commission and official notice from the City, BSI did not have the benefit of legal counsel at that meeting to present the .legal , planning and factual reasons why the Property should not be re- zoned to K -1. DISCUSSION A. The Site i$ Well - Suited to a Neighborhood Comme Use. Based on the Comprehensive Plan, the physical characteristics of the Property, the surrounding properties, traffic patterns, pedestrian patterns, and access, the Property is ideally suited to a neighborhood commercial use for the following reasons: 1. The Property faces two collector streets - McMenemy, a minor collector with a 1983 ADT of 1,100 and County Rd. B, a major collector with a 1983 ADT of 2,500. These streets provide reasonable and safe access to the Property. 2. This location serves the convenience shopping needs of an area that consists of predominantly low, medium, and high density residential land.uses. 3. A significant residential population has safe and. convenient pedestrian access to a neighborhood convenience store. ,r City of Maplewood January 10, 1985 Page 4 4. The collector streets provide vehicular access to the Property for those customers approaching from outside the immediate neighborhood without driving through the nearby residential neighborhood. From a land. use lannin perspective, the site is ideally suited P g to a neighborhood commercial use. Because of the intersection of these collector roads and present development patterns, the Property is not suited for residential purposes now or in the future. B. BSI Built and Operated the Superette i'n Reliance Upon the Con orming Zoningl BSI has built, improved the Property, and operated this Superette in good faith and reliance upon the continuation of the conforming commercial Zoning. BSI has always stood willing to comply with the requests of the City in regard to their facility and operations. BSI has tried to be and is a good neighbor. The Superette provides a benefit and necessary service to the community and City. C. BSI Would Be Unfairly and Unnecessarily Penalized if the Superette is Downzone to. R- an Re ere a Nonconforming Use. . _ If the City downzones the Property to R -1, low density residential, BSI and the community will suffer. The Superette would become a nonconTorming use. As such, one could not expect BSI to make investments to maintain the appearance of the Superette and the Property. BSI would have no incentive to implement future improvements. In fact, even if BSI wanted to up- grade the facade of the Superette to maintain an acceptable appearance, it probably would, as a nonconforming use, be prohibited from doing $o. This would .not be beneficial to BSI, for the tax base of the City, for the homes in the area, or for those in the area served by this convenience facility. Although BSI has not completed an appraisal of the financial loss of the Property as a result of the downzoning and, noncon- forming status, it is apparent that the financial loss would be s i gni f i cant . for the reasons noted. ' D. There is no Statutory Requirement that the ,Zoning for the Property be Changed from BC to R -10 The Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act only requires that once a comprehensive plan is adopted that :the zoning for properties be generally in conformance with the general use district 17 City of Maplewood January 10, 1985 Page S classification set forth in the comprehensive plan. Minn. Stat. S P Section 473.865. For exam le, if a comprehensive plan designated that a property be used for residential purposes, the property should not be rezoned for future industrial purposes without a prior amendment to the comprehensive plan. This interpretation of the statute was recently confirmed by the Metropolitan Council staff. Moreover such an interpretation makes sense. Otherwise, the adoption of a comprehensive plan would constitute a defacto downzonin g if all suggested downzonings thereafter by ordinance were automatic. The P rocedural due process rights of all affected property owners would obviously be violated in such a case beca use of the lack of P ri or notice an an opportunity ortuni ty f or a public hearing. For example, a public hearing December 1984 on a proposed down - zoning would be of little value if the p ' P in decision to downzone was a y Y actually made ears before without notice when the.Comprehensive Plan update was adopted. In fact, at the time of the public hearing, and at the time of the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan update, BSI did not know of this future possibility of downzoning. In the pres ent. case , BSI had been advised by the Office of Community Development that at the time of the 1982 Comprehensive Plan update, the only changes in land use designation were those in response to current lannin issues and public input. Since BSI -did not P g receive notice at the time of the 1982 Comprehensive Plan update, BSI did not seek a plan amendment to change the land use designa- P t i on to conform to -the existing use. Moreover, the existing BC zoning insured the conformity of the zoning to the use. The City created the NC, neighborhood commercial zoning after the adoption of the 1982 Comprehensive Plan update. The October 1984 proposal to amend the land use designation and the downzonin g g to NC, neighborhood commercial were part of a continuing process to fine-tune the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning regula- tions. E. The Dow nzoning of This Property Would be Arbitrary, Unreasonable and Contrary to Law. We have ve reviewed the City's files concerning this.proposed down - g zonin Based upon this review of the City records and the facts, it is our opinion that the proposed downzoning of the properties - would not be legal and would constitute a. "taking" of property under Article I Section 13 of the Minnesota State Constitution which P rovides that "Private property shall not :be taken, destroyed, or damaged for public use without just compensation therefor, first City of Maplewood January 10, 1985 Page 6 paid or secured ". The line between proper restrictions lawfully imposed under a municipality's right to act to promote the health, safety and welfare of the public and restrictions which invade the rights secured to the property owner by the constitutional provisions that his /her property shall not be taken, damaged or destroyed without Just compensation is a difficult line to draw. This problem was addressed by the Minnesota Supreme Court in Johnson v. City of Plymouth, 263 N.W.2d 603 (1978) in which the court state "The dividing line between restrictions which may lawfully imposed under the police power and those which invade the rights secured to the property owner by the constitutional provisions that his property shall not be taken or damaged without com- pensation, nor he be deprived of it without due process of law, has never been distinctly marked out, and probably cannot be. As different case s arise, the courts determine from the facts and circumstances of the particular case whether it falls upon one side or the other of the line." The Minnesota Supreme Court ha.s also stated that "... zoning ordinances which purport to apply to established properties cannot be used to restructure development existing at and prior to the adoption of the ordinance ". Girvan vs. County of LeSeur, 232 N.W.2d 888, 893 (Minn. 1.975) The downzoning of the Property to R -1 would violate this legal standard, and would constitute an act on the improper side of the dividing line of legal propriety, due to the long established use of the Property for neighborhood commercial purposes and the lack of any legally sufficient facts to support a downzoning. Such a course of action. results in the denial of constitutional rights of BSI.. The character of this proposed governmental action, its.economic impact and its interference with reasonable investment - backed expectations results in a taking of the property rights of BSI. The judicial standard of. review in this and all zoning matters is whether the zoning authority's action was reasonable. Honn V. C ty of Coon Ra. ids, 313 N.W.2d 409, 417 (Minn. '1981) . This stanRard is whether tie .classifi.cation is reasonabl related to the promotion of public.health, safety morals general welfare. [Emphasis added]. Minn. Stat. Section 462.357, Subd..1 (1980); 19 City of Maplewood January lo, 1985 Pa e 7 Honn, 313 N.W.2d 409,417; State, v. Rochester Assn of Neighborhoods 268 N.W.2d 885, 888 Tminn., In the resent case, there is no evidence in the record received P by the City of support the conclusion that the downzoning to R -1 is. reasonably related to the promotion of the public health, safety, morals or general welfare. The character of this action, its economic impact, and its interference with the reasonable economic expectations results in a taking of the property rights of BSI. Additionally, because the official notice of the City did not specify a possible downzoning to R -1, the action would be void. CONCLUSION BSI understands the concerns of the City that the Property not be converted to more intensive commercial uses. We believe, however, that the City can achieve its goal of compatible land uses by rezoning to the.Property to NC.and if necessary by amending the permitted uses in the NC district to assure compatibility of uses rather than the imposition of the hardship of downzoning the Property to R -1. For the legal, factual and equitable reasons stated herein, we respectfully request the City.Council to reconsider its - action of December 10, 1984, and rezone the Property to NC, neighborhood commercial as was proposed in the official notice. Very truly yours, • Bruce D. Malkerson, General Counse Timothy J. Keane, AICP TJK:ap c . c . Don Lai se , Ci,ty Attorney Barry Evans, City Manager Geof f ery Olsen, Director of Community Development Les. Axdahl, Chairman, Planning Commission pro i r . r A. Plan amendment and rezoning- -2150 McMenemy St. (Brook's Superette) Secretary Olson read the notice of public hearing. The proposal is for a comprehensive plan amendment from RL to LSC and to rezone the site from BC to NC. Staff is recommending approval as outlined in their report. 11-5-84 .Keith Carlson. representing Brook's superette, said they would go along with t the staff report for neighborhood commercial. They do not have any plans i in the near future to expand the store. They said they owner purchased the property under a BC zoning and to down grade to an R -1 zoning would be detrimental. NC would be acceptable.. Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone else present who wished to comment. Doris Calhoun, 2205 Arkwri ght. said she would be concerned if Brooks had taken into consideration what the new Cub store may do to their business situation. They would be concerned about what hours the store will be open and what hours the other services would be open. She commented that the neighbors do not want some types of people in the neighborhood that the various types of businesses may bring in, She questioned how ' many surveys were sent out to the neighborhood. Secretary Olson said there was a total of 47 sent out. Mrs. Ca 1 hours said in talking with the neighbors basic concerns are whether a NC district would eliminate some of the concerns. She asked if the site would be down -zoned to R -1 could the store still remain, but the neighborhood be protected from additional types of businesses, Secretary Ol son ' said the store could remain but could not change to another type of business use unless approved by city council, Mrs. Calhoun asked the commission to consider how the neighbors want the area to develop. They have seen the increased amount of traffic from the additional development in the area from Cub and the businesses at McMenemy and Rosel awn. Chairman Axdahl closed the public hearing portion of the meeting. Commissioner Fischer .moved the planning commission recommend the city. council adopt the following resolution: WHEREAS. the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan from RL, residential lower density to LSC, limited service commercial for 2150 McMe nemy WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: This plan amendment was initiated by. the City of Maplewood. 2. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on November . 5 1984 to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law, X4l l persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard And present written. statements. The planning -commission recommended to the city council that said plan amendment be approved. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the above-d i bed plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following findings-of-fact: 11-5-84 2 1. The site is on the corner of two collector streets, 2. The city recently approved tow s i m i l a r plan amendments at 1915 Castle Avenue and 1690 English street. 3. This site has been used commerci since the early 1960-�-s. • WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning f rom BC, - business commercial to NC, neighborhood commercial for the northerly 140 feet of the following-described property: The North 154 feet of the West one (1) acre of the N 1 of the N 1 12 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Secti 17, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Mi nnesota, subject to the rights of the public in the North . 33 feet thereof and the WEst 33 feet thereof, for road purposes, according to the United States Government Survey thereof. This property is also known as 2150 McMenemy Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural hi story ' of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was i nitiated by the City of Maplewood,. pursuant to Chapter 36,. .Arti cl a VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on November 5, 1984 The planning commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following f i ndi ngs- of -fact: .1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. _ 2. The proposed change wi ll not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed ch ange will serve the -best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the publ. i c welfare. 4. The proposed change woul have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economi extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and. schools. 5. This site has been used commercially .since the early 1960's. - 6. The NC Zone was designated for neighborhood commerci uses. 7. The site i's on the corner of two coll ector streets. B. The ci y recently approved r.ezoni from BC to INC in two' other simi situations. Commissioner Robens seconded Ayes --- Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Ell of son. f i scher, Si gmundi k, Sl etten . Robens 3 11 -5 -84 dp ACtion by Cvu,;c 4 - MEMORANDUM Endoreo _ a Modif ec. 'TO: City Manager Rei ected._._ FROM: Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner Date SUBJECT: Code Amendment- -Trash Container Enclosures DATE: January 3, 1985 SUMMARY Request Amend the ordinance which requires masonry enclosures for trash �1 dumpsters. Reason for the Request The present ordinance can create two problems: 116 An enclosure must be provided even if it would not be visible from an adjacent property or street. This is an unnecessary expense. 2. Masonry enclosures may not be compatible with the main building. .For example, Skipper's restaurant, a wood - exterior building, must have a masonry enclosure. . It would then be sided with wood to match the building for compatibility of design. rnmmor +-t-_ 'The proposed amendment (page 3) would only require trash enclosures if they would be visible from adjacent property or streets. Furthermore, to provide enclosures that are designed to be compatible with the building, the developer should be given the option of using wood, masonry or another suitable material that provides adequate screening. Masonry enclosures are preferred for durability. Wooden enclosures, however, would be acceptable if they were protected in the front by concrete-filled steel posts anchored in the ground at the front corners of the enclosure. The posts would prevent the enclosure from being hit by a garbarge truck. 'Recommendation Adoption of the ordinance amendment on page 3. REFERENCE INFORMATION Existing Ordinan 10 Refer to the amendment on page 3. 2. Adopted: 11 -22 -82 Survey Staff surveyed 27 metro cities, including those adjacent to Maplewood. Twenty of them required trash enclosures, but permitted wood construction. Four required they be of masonry construction and three had no screening requirement. 10 Recommendation by the community design review board 2. First reading by the city council 3 Second reading and public hearing by the city council jW Attach :znts : 0- ' inance amendment 2 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR SCREENING TRASH CONTAINERS THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS.AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 36 -27(e) is amended as follows (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): Trash container enclosures shall be provided around all trash containers and shall be one hundred (100) percent opaque. They shat l be protected by concrete -filled steel posts, or the equivalent, anchored in the ground at the front corners of the structure. If the enclosure is masonry, the protective posts may be omitted. In all instances, the enclosure must be of a design, material and color compatible with the building and be kept in good repair. Tfaeb- eterage- eeeta4eere- eba4l- be- eeeetreeted- ee- three- k34 - e4dea w4tb- bfee�- e -f-f-b- -eel-- -feee- bf4e�-- er- FReeenfy- A gate that provides one hundred (100) percent opaqueness shall be provided. where -a dempeter- weerd- be- y4e4bTe -te- the- peb44e -er --f eperty- _The Community Design Review Board may waive any part of these requirements if they find that the trash container would be hidden from adjacent properties and streets. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Council on 1985. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Ayes-- Nays-- C. Code amendment -- Trash Enclosures Board Member Rossbach moved the board recommend to the city council approval of the amendment to the code as outlined in the staff report dated January 3. 1985. Board Member Deans seconded Ayes ---all ' MEMORANDUM TO: .Mayor & Council FROM: Barry R. Evans, City Manager SUBJECT: Comparabl e Worth DATE: February 5, 1985 is �;" � F•_ ..�. .�. _: You will recall that State law mandates that cities perform a comparable worth study. As a result, we have joined a group of M.A.M.A. Cities in jointly preparing such a study. At the time of budget study no cost estimates were available since no bids had been received. Consequently, I recommended that $5,000 be placed in the budget. However, the actual cost has now been determined to be $7,015. i would recommend that an additional $1,015 be appropriated from the Contingency Fund to cover the added cost and that the attached resolution be adopted.. Our share is still considerably cheaper than if we were to attempt to,.dQ,it ourselves. i € i BRE :1 nb S A M P L E R E S 0 L U TiI O N RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE CONTROL DATA BUSINESS ADVISORS, INC. JOINT COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY. WHEREAS: Minnesota Statutes 471.991 enacted in 1984 requires all political subdivisions in the State to establish equitable compensation.relationship`s among its employees; and WHEREAS: The 'Metropolitan Area Management Assoc i at ion , the Coalition of Outstate Cities, the Minnesota Municipal Utilities Association and other! related - publ is jurisdictions desire to meet the requirements of the law through a joint job evaluation study; and WHEREAS: The Metropolitan Area Management Association in consultation with representatives of outstate cities and after meeting and.confering with representatives of organized labor screened and selected Control Data Business Advisors, Inc. as the consultant to perform the study; and WHEREAS: The cost of the study is to be divided among the participating jurisdictions in the following manner: Each entity will pay a base charge of Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000-00) and a charge per employee of Thirty -five Dollars ($35.00) per person. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of that it hereby approves participation of the City in the Joint Comparable Worth Study to be conducted by Control Data Business Advisors, Inc. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the sum of based on the above specified formula be transmitted to the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota which city has offered to serve as the fiscal agnt and contractor for the duration of the study. Dated this day of , 1985. Mayor Clerk /Administrator /Manager CITIES PARTICIPATING IN JO I N'r COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY Albert Lea Maplewood Alexandria Mendota Heights Anoka Minnetonka Apple Valley Minnetrista Bemidji Moorhead Benson Mora Blaine Morris Bloomington Mound Brainerd Mounds View Breckenridge New Brighton Brooklyn Center New Hope Brooklyn Park New Ulm Burnsville North St. Paul Champlin Northfield Chaska Oakdale Circle Pines Orono Cloquet Ortonville Columbia Heights Plymouth Coon Rapids Prior Lake Cottage Grove Ramsey Crookston Redwood Falls Crystal Richfield Deephaven River Falls Delano Robbinsdale Eagan Rochester East Grand Forks Roseville Eden Prairie Rosemount Edina St. Anthony Elk River St. Cloud Excelsior St. James Farmington St. Louis Park Fergus Falls St. Paul Park Forest Lake St. Peter Fridley Savage Golden Valley Shakopee Hastings Shoreview Hopkins So . St. Paul Inver Grove Heights Stillwater Lakeville Thief River Falls Lino Lakes Wayzata Litchfield West St. Paul Little Falls White Bear Lake Mankato Winona Maple Grove Woodbury. 1/8/85. = 88 Cities TO: ALL JURISDICTIONS PARTICIPATING IN JOINT COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY FROM: William S. Joynes, Chairman MAMA General Labor Relations Committee SUBJECT: FINAL COST DETERMINATION AND SAMPLE RESOLUTION At long last I am finally able to provide you with the specific dollar cost to your organization for the Comparable Worth Study being conducted by Control Data Business Advisors, Inc. The contract costs have been alloted in the following manner: 1. Three thousand dollars ($3,000.00) base charge for each jurisdiction, and 2. Thirty -five dollars ($35.00) for each employee. This is on the high side of our original estimate due to several factors. The first is the fact that we have chosen to build in a contingency of ten percent to provide for possible legal consultation or other unforeseen problems. Secondly, we have had to develop more original survey information than anticipated due to the variety of occupational areas represented in our study group. If all goes well, the project should enjoy a surplus at its conclusion which would be returned'to the participants in proportion to their original costs. I would also like to define for you the definition of a j that is, one that must pay the $ 3, OOO . 00 base fee. Obviously each individual city will be considered one entity and will be defined to include employees who work for libraries and Housing and Redevelopment Authorities. All utilities, regardless of the degree of autonomy from the city, will be considered separate entities and will be subject to the $3,000.00 base charge. Hospitals will be similarly considered. The reason for this was two -fold. One, it was necessary to develop .separate occupational survey materials for utility and medical positions. which, in fairness, the cities should not be asked to subsidize. Second, it was virtually impossible to determine which utilities were autonomous or ,operated by individual cities. A waiver of the $3,000.00 base charge to a utility because it was a part of the :city would have been difficult to discern and unfair. FINAL COST DETERMINATION -2- January 8, 1985 AND SAMPLE RESOLUTION I have attached to this explanation several items for your information: 1. If you have not as yet passed a resolution of participation the attached is a sample form which you may use. 2. Accurate as to this date, a list of all participating jurisdictions. Additions and deletions to the list will occur in the next several weeks and you will be updated. 3. The f inal page contains an estimate of the amount owed by your individual jurisdiction. The data on number of employees has been gathered from a number of sources. I am sure you will advise us if we have credited you with too many. We sincerely hope you will adjust accordingly if the �est imate is too low. As you are aware, the study has already commenced and many of our employees are actively involved in developing the initial survey materials. Each month all jurisdictions will receive a monthly update on the status of the project. If you require any additional information please feel free to contact the author at the City of Golden Valley, 545 -3781. WSJ: hf c cc: Joint Comparable Worth Personnel Committee Attach. UTILITIES PARTICIPATING IN JOINT COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY Anoka Brainerd Buf falo Chaska Elk River Grand Marais Hutchinson Marshall Moorhead 1/8/85 = 18 Utilities Mora New Ulm North St. Pau l Owatonna Princeton Shakopee Thief River Falls Virginia Wells OTHER ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING IN JOINT COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY Metropolitan Airorts Commission 1/8/85 = 1 Other Organization //,/ I Amp MEMORANDUM V TO.: Ci -ty Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Beaver Lake Storm Sewer Project, DATE: February 4, 1985 A -, 2 -}- ` * ter City Project No. 83 -7 Based on the proposed PUD conditions the easements on the Beaver Creek property would be acquired by the city at a cost equal to the assessments. Incorporating the Beaver Creek development plans into the city project plans required a revision to the original project layout as presented to the council at the public hearing on November 26, 1984. The attached map shows the new proposed project ponding areas. The estimated assessment rate for the project has thus been reduced from 6.150 to 3.830 per square foot. It is recommended that the city council order the project contingent on an agreement with the Beaver Creek owners to provide storm water easements at a cost equal to the assessments for their property. f-( -3 MEMORANDUM TO City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Frost Avenue Reconstruction (Adele to Birmingham) Project No. 83 -1 DATE: February 4, 1985 Ramsey County Department of Public Works has prepared plans and specifications for the reconstruction of Frost Avenue between Adele and Birmingham Streets, copies of which will be available for review at the council meeting. It is recommended that the council approve the two attached resolutions, the first approving the plans and specifications, and the second approving the agreement that outlines project responsibilities and cost— sharing between Maplewood and Ramsey County. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council on January 14, 1985, plans and specifications for Frost Avenue. Reconstruction (Adele to Birmingham), Project No. 83 -1, ' have been ' prepared by Ramsey County and approved by the city engineer, who has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval NOW,. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA . such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file i n the office of the city c l e r k , RESOLUTION APPROVING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the city council has previously approved.plans and specifications for Frost Avenue Reconstruction (Adele to Birmingham), Project No. 83 -1; and WHEREAS, an agreement has been prepared defining project responsibilities between the City of Maplewood and Ramsey County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: The agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby approved. The mayor and city manager are hereby authorized and instructed to execute said agreement. Agreement No. 85004 Frost Avenue, S.A.P. 62- 628 -04 Maplewood AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT by and between the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "City," and the County of Ramsey, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County "; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City and the County desire to construct and rebuild Frost Avenue (County State Aid Highway 28) from Adele Street to Birmingham Street; and WHEREAS, this portion of Frost Avenue has been designated by the Minnesota Department of Transportation as eligible for certain construction costs from the county state aid highway funds; and WHEREAS, this portion . of Frost Avenue reconstruction has been designated as project S.A.P. i 62- 628 -04; and WHEREAS, plans for Frost Avenue Project S.A.P* 62-628-04 showing proposed alignment, profiles, grades and cross sections for the 'improvement of County State Aid Highway 28 within the limits of the City as a county state aid highway project have been presented to the City; and WHEREAS, the project includes, in addition to other things, grading, storm sewer, aggregate base, bituminous base and surfacing, concrete curb and gutters, and City utility adjustments and /or improvements; and WHEREAS, the grading provisions require acquisition of certain right of way and temporary construction and slope easements prior to the construction; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation has determined allowable credit for storm sewer outfall lines previously constructed prior to the project, and the resulting portion of this storm sewer system estimated to be eligible for county state aid highway funds. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The County shall prepare the necessary .plans, specifications and proposals, take bids, and with concurrence of the City, award a contract for the construction of this project, S.A.P. 62- 628 -04; the County shall perform the construction inspection. 2. All Frost Avenue rights of way and temporary easements will be in the name of . the County, and parking and other regulations will be controlled by the County. Any rights of way which cannot be negotiated will be acquired through eminent domain proceedings and thereafter assigned by the City to the County. 3. The City shall acquire and pay for all rights of way and easements required for the construction of the project within the City except those on County -owned property. Page 1 of 3 40 The storm sewer system as shown in the plans and specifications is estimated to be eligible for 50% reimbursement by county state aid highway funds and this portion shall be paid by the County. The City shall pay that portion of the storm sewer system not eligible for reimbursement from county state. aid highway funds. The portion of the storm sewer cost to be paid by the City is estimated at 5096. 59 The City shall pay 100% of the cost of the holding pond system, exclusive of P i P e work included in storm sewer costs, south of the right of way at Station 20. 6. Upon completion of the project the County shall own and maintain the storm sewer catch basins and leads and the City shall own and maintain the storm sewer trunk lines holding pond and laterals servicing property outside the road right of way. 7. The City shall pay to the County 75% of the cost of concrete curb and gutters constructed within the City except for medians, replacement of existing concrete curb and gutters and the portion on the north side of Frost Avenue along Flicek Park between Adele Street and Frank Street. 8, The City shall pay to the County 100% of the cost of the City water main extension at Atlantic Street. Upon completion of the water main improvement the operation and. maintenance shall be the responsibility of the City. 90 Any existing City utilities modified or adjusted which are necessitated by the construction, as shown in the plans and specifications, shall be paid for by the County when eligible through its county state .aid highways funds. 10. Inspection charges by the City's water supplier, City of Saint Paul Board of Water Commissioners, shall be paid for by the City. 11. Any City utility or facility improvements to those provisions presently made in the plans and specifications may be incorporated in the construction contract by supplemental agreement and shall be paid for as specified in the supplemental agreement. 12. The City shall not assess or otherwise recover any portion of its costs . for this project through levy on County- -owned property. 13. The City shall pay 5% of its share of the construction cost, as determined by the contract as awarded, to the County as a preliminary engineering fee. This fee shall be due upon award of the construction contract. 14. The City shall pay 5% of its share of the construction cost, as determined by the final contract amounts, to the County as a construction engineering fee. This fee shall be due upon notification to the City of the final amounts paid to the contractor. 150 The County shall prepare the partial payment estimates, approved by the project construction engineer, and notify the City of its share of the costs for the City's items of work. The City shall pay its share of the cost to the Treasurer of Ramsey . County within fourteen calendar days, and the contractor shall then be paid by the County. Page 2 of 3 16. The City shall pay to the County all additional remaining costs for its share of the work upon notification by the County of the final amounts paid to the contractor. 1741 -Preliminary plans reviewed at the public hearing and final plans and specifications are hereby in all things approved. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA By _ Its By -, Its Date THE COUNTY OF RAMSEY By Chairman Board of County Commissioners Attest Chief Clerk- County Board Date Approved as to Form: Assistant County Attorney 1/28/85 Page 3 of 3 4 i MEMORANDUM N-`l Action by Council.: TO: CITY MANAGER FROM CITY CLERK Endorse REGARDING: AMENDMENT TO CODE RELATING TO UTILITY BILLING Modified. DATE: JANUARY 21 1985 Rei ecte he Sewer Utility 1 i t Billing l l i n The attached amendment tot y 9 Ordinances is proposed for first reading.. Sectio n 2 8 -24.is amended to delete the delinquency charge of $1.00. It now reads "10% or $1.00 whichever is greater".. The present billing system is not able to handle two alternate delinquency 9 rnate de l i n uenc charges without costly modifications. There are only about 10 accounts that this change would effect Section 28 -23 is amended to delete: 1) Residents billed at the senior citizen rate. 2) Properties for which someone other than occupant has requested to be billed. ORDINANCE N0, 570 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIN 28 -23 AND SECTION 28 -24 OF THE MAPLEWOOD CODE The Maplewood City Council Does Hereby Ordain As Follows: , Section 1. Section 28 -23 (a) the Maplewood Code of Ordinances is. hereby amended as follows: Section 28 -23. Statements. (a) All accounts shall be billed quarterly except for those that have city' utility billings totaling six hundred dollars ($600.00) or more per year in which case they shall be billed monthly. Statements shall be mailed to "occupant" at the address of the property except for Commercial Accounts. Section 2. Section 28 -24 (a) the Maplewood Code of Ordinances is hereby amended as follows: Section 28 -24. Delinquent accounts. (a) There shall be added to all statements not paid by the date indicated in section 28 -23 a delinquency charge of ten (10) percent of the amount due. Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this day of . ..q 1985, -Mayor ATTEST: Ayes - Uity Verk Nays - Action by G ounc' 1: JOSEPH COMPANY rEn0unuoEW10vaiydu.DEn5 E nd or C'.,1. _. Y. Gd if - - Reiec+ Da� e -- - - -- _� 5001 NORTH UNIVERSITY STREET / PEORIA, ILLINOIS 61614 / TELEPHONE 309/692 - 1135 Janaury 25, 1985 Mr, Barry Evans City Manager City Hall 138 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr, Evans: The purpose of this letter is to request of you to determine whether the City of Maplewood will consider permitting us the use of Industrial Revenue Bonds for the development of a strip shopping center to be located at Beam and Southlawn Drive adjacent to the Maplewood Mall. Due to the extensive site work required to develop this site, we are experiencing great difficulty in bringing this project to fruition. The use of Bonds will alleviate the current problems. Our project will consist of approximately 100,000 square feet of re- tail area and should generate somewhere between $10,000,000 to $20,000,000 in annual sales depending on the final tenant mix. It is currently estimated that the project cost will be approximately $800,000, and we would seek an Inducement Resolution of $6.5 million or any lesser amount you would consider approving. It would be help ful if the amount - could exceed $6.5 million which would then allow our tenants the use of IDB ' s to do their respective leasehold im- provements. UNIVERSITY SQUARE WARDC;LIFFE PLAZA FONDULAC PLAZA PEORIA PEORIA EAST PEORIA BARTONVILLE SQUARE BARTONVILLE Mr. Barry Evans Page Two January 25, 19 85 I am in receipt of your forms and will work on them in the immediate future, but Caroline Bates had indicated a letter such as this may permit you to place this request on the Council's agenda Monday, February 11, 19850 V.ry ruly yours, t David S. Jos President DSJ: js f f r 400T -0101� Action by Cou.nc Ens. o r s e ,. ___....._ Re. Date January 31, 1985 Dear Mayor and Councilmembers , This is the Park and Recreation Commission's Activity Plan for 1985. We are submitting it to you in compliance with Article II, Sec. 21 -20 of the Maplewood City Ordinance. In preparation of this plan, we reviewed our achieve- ments of the past year. We also evaluated areas in which we have continuing goals. We wish to sincerely thank each member of the Community Services staff for their cooperation and work with us this past year. We intend to continue a good working relationship with them as we proceed with our activity plan. Rita Janisch, Chairman John Chegwyn, Vice- chairman Wm. Zappa,JJr., Secretary Donald Christianson Joseph Fox Voya Piletich Bonnie Qualley Cecelia Schneider MAPLEWOOD PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION TERM OF ATTENDANCE SERVICE IN 1984 TERM EXPIRE Donald E. Chri stianson 11/77 100% 12/31/84 - 1111 E. County Road C Maplewood, Mn. 55109 Voya P i l e t i c h 4/78 75% 12/31/84 860 Burke Court Maplewood, Mr!. 55109 Dean Sherburne 2/79 50% 12/31/84 (Resigned 10/84) 1078 Marnie Street Maplewood, Mn. 55119 Joseph L . Fox 4/70 75% 12/31/85 1821 N. Myrtle Street Maplewood, Mn. 55109 Bonnie Qualley 12/74 75% 12/31/85 2089 Beam Avenue Maplewood, Mn. 55109 Wm. A. Zappa , Jr • 6/83 67% 12/31/85 230.Crestview Drive North Maplewood, Mn. 5.51 1 9 John Chegwyn 4/77 75% 12/31/86 1 E -31 E. Sextant Maplewood, Mn. 55109 _ Rita K. J a n i s c h 9/82 83% 12/31/86 . 2673 Upper Afton Road Maplewood, Mn. 55119 Cecel i a Sc hne i der 4/84 100% 12/31/86 (Appointed 4/84) 433 E . La rpe nteur Maplewood, Mn. 55117 Mari lyn Galbraith 4/81 100% 12/31/86 (Res i fined 318L) 1770 Edward Street Maplewood, Mn. 55109 ACTIVITIES PLAN Area: Sources & Uses of Funds The Commission did increase its awareness of the fin- ancial operation of the Community Services Department. We did this through meeting with the city manager and with the city financial director. We now receive monthly financial statements. The community services director worked with an intern program. We will continue to investigate the uses of volunteers. Area: Maplewood Citizen Park & Recreation Needs A committee did evaluate community needs for organized athletic complexes. Surveys of neighborhood interests and wishes were conducted at Maplewood Heights regarding play- ground equipment and at Western Hills regarding lights. A committee reviewed the operating costs for the Heritage Center. Recommended maintenance work is now being done there. We will continue to evaluate the needs of the handicapped and of senior citizens. Area: Park & Recreation Commission Member Involvement Our Commission representatives took an active part in these and other events: Nature Center 5th . Anniversary Celebration, Fourth of July Celebration and Art in the Park. We contributed to the Metro Council Regional Park planning hearing. We will continue to encourage participation at Park and Recreation sponsored activities. Area: Park & Recreation Commission Effectiveness We received regular financial. status reports from the finance director. The staff has established an indexing mechanism . for referencing motions. We did use and we will continue to do so, committees to allow us to deal more effectively in a greater number of areas. Page 2 ACTIVITIES. PLAN Area: Communications with Citv Council We did meet with the city council several times this year. We hope this continues. The city manager and one council member attended several of our meetings. We encourage more of this by others. We request that the prospective park commissioners attend one of our meetings before being appointed. If the city council needs further information of park and recreation matters, we will try to answer any questions. Area: Capital Improvements The P rocedure here had changed to funding each project as the need arises and as the funding becomes available. These are our proposed projects for the coming year: -- upgrading the ballfields -- increasing trails -- developing a plan for Cope Park -- installation of playground equipment - -land acquisition or 4 Ca. 0 �I a; 0 z� w 'z a� 4) CL O a L a 4J .0 Z7 O O 3 a O. C w • .�L 4J L. C a E 4J r L. a a a k- C3 O a U O Or- +e > C f.. as > sn . c 4J C C a� s- E O U V •o a .0 0 4-6 . MAPLEWOOD PARKS INVENTORY SUMMARY PARK NA ME LOCATION PROPOSED CLASSIFICATION OWNER ACRES PRESENT FACILITIES 1. Walser" Hills Adolphus Street a Crest Court Neighborhood Park City 6.0 Skating, bolifield, ploy Mee tout 2. Rosek"^ FsrvFond me. Vernon a C" Street Open Space City 4.0 U nde ve loped 3 9dwortats Awk Skillman a Edgerton Street Special thwcottlltwn Fly City 10.0 Beilftelds, skating "low Playfield 4. Daiwa lark Desoto a Ripley Future Neighbonhood Perk Private 4.0 Undeveloped 5. Ken wood Park Bellwood a Kenwood Derive Mini - Park - City O.S Play area, rink •. r e p El dridge a Arcode Mini- City t ennis courts y. 1,00k"o Gordon a Pholen fork Mini -Pork Cit 0.2 Undeveloped i. Gloster f' A Frisb Avenue Neighborhood Fork City 3.0 Play area, balifelds 9. MC A fork Frost Avenue a Soo R.R. Add to Regional Perk Ramsey Co. 3.0 Bo building 10. Kollar, 'Isalow Pork Keller a Round Lakes Regional Pork /Open Space Ramsey Co. a 260.0 Shelter, pit cause, pkok eree, how . St. Ploul 11. Baler Frrlt Bwlc• a Al is S1 1640 1 N•i flank Clt .o Pay, tot+nis, hsr�d cowt� folio 13 and 14) 120 Cope Street Site Cope a Hazelwood Special UWCommunity Pens Condetttrwtlon 15.0 Undeveloped 13. Glelim a Panic English a Awk Avenue 1/3 Neighborhood Fork City $A Undeveaped folio 11 and 14 ) 14. Reihlsood Peak Soo R.R. a Skiliwn 1/3 Neighborhhood fank City CO Pay are@, bolifiold folso II and 13) Is, K oh Inman Polk Co. Rd. 'C' a Cypress St. Neighborhood Park City 7.0 Bo 11 f i e Id, IQ ores st s 1 Street ly OIJ 7 Loosed Bo is Church 17. Wrk•fieid Balls Wakefield Lake Community /Neighborhood !uk Ramey Co. 41.0 Shollor, beach, Mlmelds, "I" 10. Me"Imeed fl rk Kenwrd St. a Co. Rd. 'C' Community PloyfiskV City 40.0 Soccer fsaldt Neighborhood Pork 19. Four Se•son►s Gervais a Kennard Soma Neighborhood Pork City 10.0 Ploy wee, moils, tennis courts 20. Map lewood Noe Is fork Furness d Mapie Lone Neighborhood Pork City 22.0 Play woo, trails, tennis cowls . y crest Lyd Fort• ra Lane M nr t oa P y or d court 220 Joy Po k North end of Silver Lake Ramsey County Pak Roney Co. 63.0 Shelters, picnic, pay area, trails. R* wg 23. AftPlewood Park Site Public Works Building Open Space City 4.0 Undeveloped 24. Goodrich Golf Ca mw White Bear Ave. C ounty Special Use Ramsey Co. 142.0 Golf Course, shelters !!. G•aslrlch Fob N. St.fau Rd, a Ripley Ave. Community Plo yfiolW Loosed ftottt 2200 Bollfnelds, pay aces Nei boyhood Pork Romr Co. 2 `, is Pmt r 39 Holloway Neighborhood Poork City 11.0 Undeveloped 27. Geths tea+o Sontlemy a 7th Stns« Nei Perk City /Church 10.0 Skating, balifields, sl+olter M/ . A04pie. Meows A46111011to" i 1s Special use City 40.0 Building, hiking trail, Cooler 29. Liao fbnk Margaret a Farrell Streets Mini -Flask City 3.0 Hard courts, ploy eyes, bollf shk 30. Bnttlo Creek McKnigh a w Afton Regional Pork Room Co. 370.0 ricn16n th ii and trails 11 , Afton Ho;gh 9X Ad jacent to Bolt • C reA w elik6AiQ Ramsey C 12.0 sell h• ter, p eras, 32. Crest Addition Lower Afton a Landin tone Mini -Pork City 2.0 Undeveloped 33, M. iland Rand Site Moilond Rd a Lake ood Or. Mini -Paris City 1.0 undeveloped 34. Please m Vieux ftrk soulkr•st Drive Neighborhood Park City 14.0 Undeveloped 35. Beover Lobe & over Lake Count ark/ en ce C ount y Open Space _Ron+w Co. Rorri y O. 42.0 F/ r Sterl -6 1 l6. a onnod acreage ) 37. C01MIl Ds1i11 18 r « C O. Rd. C a Whine lew Ave County Open Space Ramsey Co. se 91.0 a ned li ocreoge Ill. Mitt. Scattered County Open Space Ramsey Co. 60.0 APPROXIMATE TOTAL ACREAGE: 1,467.0 " W f was Out O •• T� 0 17 T • ON" < iar too • • .Wr. .w •.��w _' f ' owes$ It Oak% X37 a" " r • 26 1 / a i s+ .• - ee "rX � k ! - - vMr- v s � i 3 +w...•+ _ •+ I ..... '�• Aor; 1N• Ib�l(aj s *1 +tw .w1 s 4+ 1 / J 1r ` ea ;«-.K /0r CO M..e.+ h of ., a ><.* . , 3 _ 2 M 4 1 00 10101P1001111 l+l zi r ft �Mll !� rrul ar s an ope s ace Sites Regional Parks ` Municipal parks Open Spvice Coun Porky Note: Numbers refer to text. aesearchI Sources: Midwest Planning and Research, Inc., 1979 v Brauer & Associates, 1974 moo" mow — Ci ty of Ma plewood Parks Department r a" " r • 26 1 / a i s+ .• - ee "rX � k ! - - vMr- v s � i 3 +w...•+ _ •+ I ..... '�• Aor; 1N• Ib�l(aj s *1 +tw .w1 s 4+ 1 / J 1r ` ea ;«-.K /0r CO M..e.+ h of y 3 MEMORANDUM To: Barry Evans, City Manager °► .j-;J From: .Robert D. Odegard, Director of Community Service TYt Sub j : Cope Park Expansion - Brooks & Hughes Properties Date: January 23, 198 5 - The Park and Recreation Commission at their January 21, 1985, meeting discussed the staff proposal to purchase.Parcel #6 (Frances E. Hughes) and Parcel #7 (Elizabeth J. Hughes Brooks) adjacent to the Cope Avenue Park site. They con- curred with the recommendation that the addition of 47,175 square feet in Par - cel #6 and #7, plus the additional 29,100 square feet that would be added due to street vacation, could be an excellent addition to the park. As indicated in the attached report, the addition of these two parcels would add immeasurably to the park property and the capability of designing the park for expanded use. If Parcel #6 and #7 were to be developed, necessitating the building of streets and providing water and sewer, the estimated cost by the Director of Public Works to the City as owner of the adjacent property could be $35,000 to $45,000. Recommendation The Park and Recreation Commission recommends to the City Council the purchase of Parcel #6 and Parcel #7 as legally described in the appraisal of Win Mitchell dated December 20, 1984, in the amount of the option contracts. The funds for this purchase shall be provided from the Commercial P.A.C. account (94) in the amount of $18,500. Enc. (1) MEMORANDUM To: Park and Recreation Commissioners From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Community Service. . Subj: Cope Avenue Park Expansion - Brooks & Hughes Properties Date: January 15, 1985 Background In the original pp P ri inal a lication of the Cope Park site, two lots were part of the original Land and Water Conservation grant application. Part of the closing out of the grant included the deletion of these two parcels since the court award far exceeded the grant request. The two lots, Parcel #6 and #7, a in the western corner. Parcel #.6 on Laurie Road and a depth of 134 square feet. Neither Laurie Road (Elizabeth J. Hughes Brooks) lies age on Laurie Road. Its depth is tai ns 20,231 square feet. re located along the south edge of Cope Park (Frances E. Hughes) has 199 feet of frontage feet on Germain Street. It contains 26,944 nor Germain Street are graded. Parcel #7 west of Parcel #6 and has 150 feet of front- approximately 134 feet and the parcel con- A more elaborate property description, zoning and use, valuations, aerial photo, and s i t e information i's available in the attached appraisal by Winfield A. Mitchell of December 20, 19840 Option Contracts Option contracts have been drawn up each parcel. Parcel #6 (Frances E. (Elizabeth J. Hughes Brooks) is for recommended values as indicated in for sixty days from December 19, 1984, for Hughes) is for $10,400 and Parcel #7 $8 Both option amounts are for the the appraisal of the property. City Benefits I . In addition to the 47,175 square feet in Parcel #6 and #7, the City will also gain 8,100 square feet for Germain Street and 21,000 square feet for Laurie Road. This additional 29,100 square feet i s a major addition to the park. The present to the north of the parcels is 270 plus feet. By adding the new parcels, they will give us an additional 465 feet for a property total of 697 feet .north and south. The p resent east -west distance along the south border is 447 feet. With the-addi- tion of Parcel #6 and Parcel #7, this increases our border an additional 409 feet to a total of 856 feet. Available Funds Two sources of funds are available for this purchase. The Neighborhood PAC Fund for Sherwood Glen (Code 86) which includes the - area bounded by Highway #hl to Centur y and Frost to Highwav #36, includes Timber, Gladstone, Cope, Flicek, and Robinhood Parks. This fund as of November 30, 1984, had a balance of $23,462.66. There is also c consideration for this purchase from the Commercial Account, which paid the original $217,997 for Cope Park. Recommendation It is requested that the Park and Recreation Commission recommend to the City Council the P urchase of Parcel #6 and Parcel #7 as legally described in the appraisal of Win Mitchell dated December 20, 1984, in the amount indicated in the option contracts*. The funds for this purchase shall be provided from the Sherwood Glen Neighborhood PAC Account (86)'in the amount of $1.8,500. Enc. (1) WINFIELD A. 1VIITCHELL REALTOR Mr. Robert Ode gard, Director of Community Services City of Maplewood 1380 - Frost Ave. Maplewood, Minn. 55109 REALTOR' SALES - APPRAISALS 412 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 TEL. (612) 222 -0788 December 20, 1984 RE: Our File No. 84 -35 Cope Ave, Park Expansion Brooks & Hughes Properties Dear 'Mr. Ode gard : • is a memorandum appraisal of the two Transmitted herewith pp properties referred to above. The identification of the properties and t estimated values are: Parcel No. 6 - Frances E. Hughes: $10 Parcel No. 7 Elizabeth J. Hughes Brooks: -$ 8 YAe val uations are intended to apply as of November 13, 19840 Very truly yours, r Winfield A. Mitchell Senior Member American Society of Appraisers wAM/ fm WINFIELD A. MITCHELL APPRAISALS 412 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA SS 101 Cit y of Ma lewood Appraisal No. 84-35 Cope Ave. ark Expansion Brooks & Hughes Properties MD10RANDM A PPRA I SAL IDENTIT OF PROPERTY The properties which are the subjects of this memorandum appraisal con- sist of two contiguous tracts of unimproved land lying south of Laurie Road and west of Germain Street. The two parcels are treated separately. They are further identified as Parcel 6 and Parcel 7. 'LiRPOSE OF THE APPRAISAL The ose u of the ap is to estimate the market value of the pro p � PP perty. iMarket value is defined as: 'The highest price estimated in terms of money which a property will bring if exposed for sale in the open market, allowing a reasonable time to find a purchaser who buys with knowledge of all the uses to which it is adapted and for which it is capable of being used.' Tine date of the value estimate is November 13, 1984. { - 1 - WINFIELD A. MITCHELL APPRAISALS 412 MIDWEST FEDLRAL BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55 10 1 ,ope Ave. Park Expansion Appraisal No. 84 -35 .EGA.L DESCRIPTION ' AND OWl ERSH I P Parcel No. 6 Tne East 199.87 ft. of Lot 1, Block 24, Smith & Taylor's Addition to No. St. Paul together with vacated alley adjacent to said premises as accrued to it b y reason of the vacation thereof; subject to easements of record. Record Owner: Frances E. Hughes, c/o Elizabeth A. Peques,.attorney in fact. Parcel. No. 7 The East 150.0 ft. of the West 440 ft. of Lot 1, Block 24, Smi & Taylor's Addition to No. St. Paul, together with vacated al ley adjacent to said p remises as accrued to it by reason of the vacation ttlereof subject to easements of record. - • J. Hughes Brooks c/o Elizabeth Peques, attorney in fact Record Owner Eliza beth g , ES SIN �NT kN TAX DATA Parcel No. 6 Identification No. 57-68800-040-24 Estimated ?vZarket Value - 1984 - $2,200-00 Real Estate Tax - 1984 Ad Valorem Spec. Assmt. Total Special Assessment Balance Parcel No. 7 Identification No. 57- 68800 - 080 -24 Estimated Market Value - 1984 $1,400.00 Real Estate Tax - 1984 Ad Valorem Spec, As smt . Total $103.34 32.08. $135.42 $ 30.36 $ 65.76 Non b 76 _. 2 - WINFIELD A. MITCHELL APPRAISALS 112 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA SS 10I II Cope Ave. Park Expansion PROPERTY'DESCRIPTION ,Appraisal No. 84 -35 Parcel No. 6 has 199.87 feet of frontage on Laurie Road and a depth of 134.81 feet on Germain Street. It contains 26,944 square feet, more or less. Neither Laurie Road nor Germain Street are graded Tlie improved portion of Germain Street ends at Sandhurst Street, one block south of Laurie Road. Laurie Road is unimproved between Kennard Street on the east and Hazelwood Avenue on the west. The tract has rolling terrain and is all open except for saplings and brush. The subsoils appear adequate for residential construction. A sanitary sewer main exists in Germain Street. There is no service connection to the pro- perty. Water and other utilities are not immediately available. Parcel No. 7 lies west of Parcel No. 6 and has 150 feet of frontage on Laurie Road. Its depth is approximately 134.87 feet, and it contains Z0, 231 square feet, more or less The tract has the same type of rolling terrain as Parcel No. 6 and similar type ground cover. T i here s no improved street nor utilities available, ZONING AND USE Both tracts are zoned R, single family residence district. Each tract could be subdivided into two homes i tes . One of the two tracts in Parcel No. 6 would be 100 feet by 134.81 feet and contain 13,481 square feet; the other would be 99.87 feet by 134.81 feet and contain 13,463 square feet, Parcel No. 7 could be subdivided into two tracts.; each tract would be 75 feet wide and 134.87 feet deep. They would each contain 10,115 square feet, more or less. In order to subdivide the tracts and make them buildable, Laurie Road would have to be constructed and water installed in the street or private wells pro- vided. Sanitary sewer would have to be extended westerly from Germain Street to serve the westerly portion of Parcel No. 6 and the two potential homesites in Parcel No. 7, In accordance with city policy, storm sewer facilities would. also have to be made available for the two properties. The manner in which these streets and utilities would be improved was not dealt with. Iffiether the improvements would be made upon the owner's petition or whether they would result from council origination, cannot be deduced at this time. The city's position relative to cost participation because of ownership of the abutting land on the north side of Laurie Road was also not considered. It seems likely, however, that a determined developer could obtain the necessary public improvements to the tracts buildable. In my opinion, such use would be the highest and best use of the land. - 3 - WINFIELD X. MITCHELL APPRAISALS 412 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA SS 101 JlCope Ave. Park Expansion Appraisal No. 84 -35 ALUE E ST EMATE Each P arcel was valued separately. It was assumed, however, that street access and utilities would be provided concurrently. The bases of the valuations were sales of similar type tracts in the commun.- ity. The following sales were considered: Index Sq. Ft. Price No . Location Date Zoning Price Area Pe r SF 201b English o. o Co. C g English, So. of Co. C 5 81 6/ 82 R R 9,000 $ 9 000 18,240 22,720 .0.49 $0.40 41 8a Hazelwood So. of Co. C 3/82 F $16 , 000 25,950 $0.6? 226 , Sandhurst w of Germain 2/80 R $15,soo 10,111 $1.53 250 Soutniwol So. of Radatz 9/82 F $17,SOO 28, 515 $0.61 251 Hazelwood So. of. Beam 4/81 F $15 750 29, 750 $0.53 25 Z , Co. B near Hazel 1/81 F $15,000 24,000 $0.63 264 Beam and Koiz lman 6/ 80 R $ 4 , 7 74 2 7 ,14 8 � 0.18 $0.18 265 Beam E. of. Kohlman 6/80 R $ 9,625 54,296 1 sales of contiguous Index No.'s �O1a and 201b are gu tracts lying east of English Street and south of County Road C. The sales represent raw land values be- fore the street and utilities were constructed. Each tract was improved as a single g family homesite. Each is Y considered superior to the . subs ect. property. Index No. 264 and No. 265 are sales of two tracts lying north of Beam Avenue but without street frontage. The sales were purchased by owners of the atutt- g y in southerly parcels that had frontage on Beam Avenue. Tile abutting parcels had previously been improved with single family dwellings. Neither of th: sales were ro osed to be subdivided but were purchased only to protect the P P owners of the abutting property from adverse encroachment. These two parcels are considered inferior. The five other sales are tracts that were suitable for irnamediate development purchased purpose* urchased for that u se. All were served by public utilities and were all had frontage on bituminous surfaced streets. Althoug11 f our of the sales are g or g as large larger than the subject parcels, none of them were capable of subdivision because of limited street frontage. Sale No. 226 on Sandhurst Drive near Germain Street is an average sized lot that was irprotiTed with a single family dwelling. These five sales are included to demonstrate the Y g potential v j value of the sub ' ect parcels after subdivision and installation of street and utilities. 4_ { WINFIELD A. MITCHELL APPRAISALS 412 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA SS 101 Cope Ave. Park Expansion Appraisal No. 84- 35 Based these sales, the indicated value of Parcel No. 6 is $10,400 or 26,944 square feet at $0.385 per square foot, more or less. The fact that this parcel could be subdivided into only two. oversized lots reduces its overall value, but offsetting the effect of this limitation is the exist - ence of sanitary sewer along the east property line. The sales indicate a total value of $8,100 for Parcel No. 7. The unit value of this parcel is $0.40 per square foot, more or less. The slightly higher value indicated for this parcel results from the smaller size of the parcel and the better subdivision potential. .- Based on the data contained herein, it is my opinion that the cash market value of Parcel No. 6 is: TL-N THOUSA'N'D FOUR HUNDRED kND NO/ 100 DOLLARS ($10,400.00) It is further my opinion that the cash market value of Parcel No. 7 is: EIGHT THOUSANTD ONE HtJNDRED DOLLARS ($8,100.00) T"ne valuations are intended to apply as of November .13, 1984. 5 WINFIELD A. MITCHELL APPRAISALS 412 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 Il Cope Ave. Park Expansion Appraisal No. 84-36 CONTINGENT AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 1 . The legal description is considered to be correct. 2. No responsibility is asstnned for matters legal in character, nor is any opinion expressed as to the validity of title or ournership. 3. The data and information contained in this report were gathered from usually reliable sources but are not guaranteed accurate. 4. This report in total or in part may not be copied, reproduced nor published without prior consent of the writer. S. Testimony in court or before commissioners in connection with this appraisal shall be arranged for separately. CERT I F CAT IO�T I certify that I have personally inspected the property described 'herein, and that to the best of . my knowledge and belief the statements contained in the appraisal are true and correct. I further certify that neither my employment nor my compensation for making t1iis appraisal are In any way contingent upon the values reported. herein. I certify that I have no direct or indirect present or contem- plated future interest in the property. .m Iy` f l ip Winf field A. Mitchell cember 20 , 1984 4 u. i #84-35 .. s, F _ h ��;� `�� Location Map s ti o� it t` �Ari Q5D 41F • \ \uA 30 a 1ti� 09 Ag ��►. o s? ; �/ 29aa�' 4 °C 33i. $ 3 31.8(0' s,. W e� a f�. I+d•"' , - 255 33 .0 CoNOEMN[O 10. 1'? ?O aIST� cT. F1�.E 3'73920 'LpeF ii.�o `�s/ �M �Kf3234� g`g 72 ,� :.��'.�•' - 1 -- rJ wi• r► f- ��. w�� _ii�ir- 1= ii�1' +- ��-�-��--��• 1• � ��s�-�• �.-��-� .7 1 S 4 3 L 1 i Orr 1 r a 24 25 26 27 10 2! 30 4 O d e4 cy - i dx ; a. .�t'V 4 Q\ r fn � 602-39' N '72 90' V -� 7 m � y r oZQ iu 020 +� • on al 026 02� Z r p 23 h Z 3 2,3 ]u1 0 3 Q N 23 . 3 7S 1 75 ? 7S' •7 f3 so.' - - - boo 36 boa. 36' V/R g•I?-99 '��SC 4 �c 149489 6 0� 3 30 SAN A f( Ds c 54 3 A .o r► ♦" i L ?5 ^ ;6 5 4 3 2 2 S SS 4 ' i I 24 25! 26 ;2 20 I 2 4 ) 3bp` 1 75 1 75 TS' 3 1 �� - o - �, JSo.3G� . �� 6oc. 7S' 9o' y 160' 3� /a Q QF Z 10 0 (l9 0 sn _ 89 f9 3' 4 3' VA goo" ioa.f35�� 60 6 o S 1333.625 _ x3 �. P F LU( ADDITION 100 75 75' 103.36 100 : 15 D' -� oGo I�p 21 O o 2G s C N a IOO 240 190 * ZG 1 2G � d m 1 20 Ito t Go 9�0 77 �?' io3. 5 ioo" fSO' st !► � • r � . t yl � tii�r ! i► ' !'�' � -�l' � :+� ; � ts �� ► , � ip •. :► _,, .. � „�, . Sri • �r . �s .. � i>t � � � � .. �. � • r`i � • 40 f LAR K AV E. N i � -- Z 6 1 S 4 3 Z' 1 N .. 2 6 - -' ' •• 14 2.6 22 S' 9-3$' 7$. 8. m` h h s 6oz 30' `./ • 01 II i 8 ;O e " 1 eu. u uj „�; ► ► N U 4 3 2 i` ! N o 02 Z-) og o i l 1 p� 4 N - d 1 v a K ._ 1 N ,' on - - i . Y a � a 40 Z � 2-4 5 26' ZB 29 30 h h N y 251 o09 2'11 ce ,. .. 0 Oe 4D' �` `^ 2 2 5 -J°�?- a'9= 3'74.9 7 6 02. a7 . o_- �_�.- -- „o _ o �f, LAU ROAD N '72 90' V -� 7 m � y r oZQ iu 020 +� • on al 026 02� Z r p 23 h Z 3 2,3 ]u1 0 3 Q N 23 . 3 7S 1 75 ? 7S' •7 f3 so.' - - - boo 36 boa. 36' V/R g•I?-99 '��SC 4 �c 149489 6 0� 3 30 SAN A f( Ds c 54 3 A .o r► ♦" i L ?5 ^ ;6 5 4 3 2 2 S SS 4 ' i I 24 25! 26 ;2 20 I 2 4 ) 3bp` 1 75 1 75 TS' 3 1 �� - o - �, JSo.3G� . �� 6oc. 7S' 9o' y 160' 3� /a Q QF Z 10 0 (l9 0 sn _ 89 f9 3' 4 3' VA goo" ioa.f35�� 60 6 o S 1333.625 _ x3 �. P F LU( ADDITION 100 75 75' 103.36 100 : 15 D' -� oGo I�p 21 O o 2G s C N a IOO 240 190 * ZG 1 2G � d m 1 20 Ito t Go 9�0 77 �?' io3. 5 ioo" fSO' st !► � • r � . t yl � tii�r ! i► ' !'�' � -�l' � :+� ; � ts �� ► , � ip •. :► _,, .. � „�, . Sri • �r . �s .. � i>t � � � � .. �. � • r`i � • 40 f hK N 1 N i � -- Z 6 1 S 4 3 Z' 1 N 2 6 - C C 14 2.6 m` h h s N • 01 II i ,I ;O N '72 90' V -� 7 m � y r oZQ iu 020 +� • on al 026 02� Z r p 23 h Z 3 2,3 ]u1 0 3 Q N 23 . 3 7S 1 75 ? 7S' •7 f3 so.' - - - boo 36 boa. 36' V/R g•I?-99 '��SC 4 �c 149489 6 0� 3 30 SAN A f( Ds c 54 3 A .o r► ♦" i L ?5 ^ ;6 5 4 3 2 2 S SS 4 ' i I 24 25! 26 ;2 20 I 2 4 ) 3bp` 1 75 1 75 TS' 3 1 �� - o - �, JSo.3G� . �� 6oc. 7S' 9o' y 160' 3� /a Q QF Z 10 0 (l9 0 sn _ 89 f9 3' 4 3' VA goo" ioa.f35�� 60 6 o S 1333.625 _ x3 �. P F LU( ADDITION 100 75 75' 103.36 100 : 15 D' -� oGo I�p 21 O o 2G s C N a IOO 240 190 * ZG 1 2G � d m 1 20 Ito t Go 9�0 77 �?' io3. 5 ioo" fSO' st !► � • r � . t yl � tii�r ! i► ' !'�' � -�l' � :+� ; � ts �� ► , � ip •. :► _,, .. � „�, . Sri • �r . �s .. � i>t � � � � .. �. � • r`i � • hK N N i " 04 - -- Z Z M A A - C C m` h h s s m m 0 � �a3• 1 eu. u uj „�; ► ► N -� 7 m � y r oZQ iu 020 +� • on al 026 02� Z r p 23 h Z 3 2,3 ]u1 0 3 Q N 23 . 3 7S 1 75 ? 7S' •7 f3 so.' - - - boo 36 boa. 36' V/R g•I?-99 '��SC 4 �c 149489 6 0� 3 30 SAN A f( Ds c 54 3 A .o r► ♦" i L ?5 ^ ;6 5 4 3 2 2 S SS 4 ' i I 24 25! 26 ;2 20 I 2 4 ) 3bp` 1 75 1 75 TS' 3 1 �� - o - �, JSo.3G� . �� 6oc. 7S' 9o' y 160' 3� /a Q QF Z 10 0 (l9 0 sn _ 89 f9 3' 4 3' VA goo" ioa.f35�� 60 6 o S 1333.625 _ x3 �. P F LU( ADDITION 100 75 75' 103.36 100 : 15 D' -� oGo I�p 21 O o 2G s C N a IOO 240 190 * ZG 1 2G � d m 1 20 Ito t Go 9�0 77 �?' io3. 5 ioo" fSO' st !► � • r � . t yl � tii�r ! i► ' !'�' � -�l' � :+� ; � ts �� ► , � ip •. :► _,, .. � „�, . Sri • �r . �s .. � i>t � � � � .. �. � • r`i � • - - - boo 36 boa. 36' V/R g•I?-99 '��SC 4 �c 149489 6 0� 3 30 SAN A f( Ds c 54 3 A .o r► ♦" i L ?5 ^ ;6 5 4 3 2 2 S SS 4 ' i I 24 25! 26 ;2 20 I 2 4 ) 3bp` 1 75 1 75 TS' 3 1 �� - o - �, JSo.3G� . �� 6oc. 7S' 9o' y 160' 3� /a Q QF Z 10 0 (l9 0 sn _ 89 f9 3' 4 3' VA goo" ioa.f35�� 60 6 o S 1333.625 _ x3 �. P F LU( ADDITION 100 75 75' 103.36 100 : 15 D' -� oGo I�p 21 O o 2G s C N a IOO 240 190 * ZG 1 2G � d m 1 20 Ito t Go 9�0 77 �?' io3. 5 ioo" fSO' st !► � • r � . t yl � tii�r ! i► ' !'�' � -�l' � :+� ; � ts �� ► , � ip •. :► _,, .. � „�, . Sri • �r . �s .. � i>t � � � � .. �. � • r`i � • 1 �� - o - �, JSo.3G� . �� 6oc. 7S' 9o' y 160' 3� /a Q QF Z 10 0 (l9 0 sn _ 89 f9 3' 4 3' VA goo" ioa.f35�� 60 6 o S 1333.625 _ x3 �. P F LU( ADDITION 100 75 75' 103.36 100 : 15 D' -� oGo I�p 21 O o 2G s C N a IOO 240 190 * ZG 1 2G � d m 1 20 Ito t Go 9�0 77 �?' io3. 5 ioo" fSO' st !► � • r � . t yl � tii�r ! i► ' !'�' � -�l' � :+� ; � ts �� ► , � ip •. :► _,, .. � „�, . Sri • �r . �s .. � i>t � � � � .. �. � • r`i � • _ 89 f9 3' 4 3' VA goo" ioa.f35�� 60 6 o S 1333.625 _ x3 �. P F LU( ADDITION 100 75 75' 103.36 100 : 15 D' -� oGo I�p 21 O o 2G s C N a IOO 240 190 * ZG 1 2G � d m 1 20 Ito t Go 9�0 77 �?' io3. 5 ioo" fSO' st !► � • r � . t yl � tii�r ! i► ' !'�' � -�l' � :+� ; � ts �� ► , � ip •. :► _,, .. � „�, . Sri • �r . �s .. � i>t � � � � .. �. � • r`i � • st !► � • r � . t yl � tii�r ! i► ' !'�' � -�l' � :+� ; � ts �� ► , � ip •. :► _,, .. � „�, . Sri • �r . �s .. � i>t � � � � .. �. � • r`i � • #84-35- Aerial Photo Affi� I F '!P " r A .. - fo. ..T 7. 0'. A-L w —A. t. Z.- I, emd I r-A- aw . • 4b m g V4--tl 'Amw-w-. -JM JW 75 �P"*Ogrw qlmclv—jr f ft -V A 40 _2 V J -A "043r- %W1 bt, 04*~ --A AFI'.'04W I -0-4-6--t 40"t - 2_ *Volt &.4. oft pr swidw ZAN*. 4 •1L d " Id W %W qgk ._ Ir ab� 1 1 d %ft A., % 4t- 6, a, "b � � S *• � _ � � � .c . �y.S� �'��.'.•,}. . � •,�� ( � 'aL�•" -•rte �, * �� Of A f A 0 %t �: t � i , — ' . ir- �� y +t. , .:.: a + r •. � ? �`+ -t �' ... ' : 1 ' � �. s� t .•S - . ' � •. . •• • . •. . + �, •. 1 Z "'•. %no IL F4 AL 6 t4 a 43 ipA 5 ..Sp v � ' 1�' .i►,�.� i.t r . .. - � .1r T'. -. � �• - r t V [ �� c. - � •w ,� ,/ 1 J1 A17 APO. 21, • � � • t 3 • � ,: } . a �• ' '_ 2 • 46 06- --J= AV OL T vp • s m— -OW 4 AIMMI f Aa4jr .4 -4 F_ 4"d • •,�� . -'. ;.11'11, t'�r•+ 'y� -1< �� -'�' '� 2� ;. • yR�•,�I.. ' � �[� i"t +. �i � S � - J" -{.a 4ti. � ( ' �:. • r • � C � f 1 * T To 4 I •p. 4 IL fw % t j � •� �. �J,�t•: r _ 1 ' � .. TT� any _ • _ - _ 'r v r \L 4L Pr all -101 4r 4� ab 11 ir 44' Z.1 A VrIlf 4_*AM!_*_ 1 1 lf e 1, . � �� ` � 49, 4F 4e 0 AERIAL PHOTO / PROPERTY LINES (Photo Dote 1974) SCALE-1 200' DATE 4/9/81 4 4 - lea r+ e 1, . � �� ` � 49, 4F 4e 0 AERIAL PHOTO / PROPERTY LINES (Photo Dote 1974) SCALE-1 200' DATE 4/9/81 J50 MEMORANDUM - CXL To: Barry Evans, City Manager From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Community Service ::_, Y Subj Improvements To Maplewood Ball Diamonds i. ; •� v :.L. -,.. :� Date • January 23, 1985 Background L tF , On October 13, 1984, the Maplewood Athletic Association Action Committee toured the athletic f a c i l i t i e s (baseball and softball fields) at Afton Heights, Harvest, and Edgerton Parks. Although their review took place approximately eight weeks after the close of maintaining these athletic facilities, and their misunderstand- ing as to ownership of property, their basic thesis that the softball and base - ball diamonds at these facilities should be improved is correct. After you and I met with the committee, they also attended the December Park and Recreation Com- mission meeting. The Park and Recreation Commission established a Ballfields Evaluation Committee and on Wednesday, January 16, the Commission members, M.A.A. representatives, and Director of Community Services met to discuss what priori- ties should be set. (See attached report). The Ballfields Evaluation Committee reported to the Park and Recreation Commis- sion on January 21, Recommendation The Park and Recreation Commission passed a motion recommending to the City Council that $25,000 from the Commercial P.A.C. funds be placed in a.ballfield improvement fund. It is the intention to improve the baseball diamond at Afton Heights at a cost of approximately $11,000, the Edgerton baseball diamond at a cost of $8,000, and improve the playing. surface at the Harvest fields for the remaining $6,000. If any funds remain from the allocated $25,000, they will be used to start an improvement program for the other diamonds at Afton and Edgerton. Enc. (1) Ballfields Evaluation Committee Report BALLFIELDS EVALUATION COMMITTEE REPORT On Wednesday, Jan. 16, 1985, Commissioners: Chegwyn, Janisch and Schneider, and Director Odegard met with M.A.A. representatives: Miller, Skok and Sigmundik . Doug Ronsberg was absent. We began by getting an overview of existing neighborhood open space and parks. We examined weekly usage of current fields. Also, we looked at existing athletic facilities and potential sites for such. Staff provided these maps and charts. After this background, we discussed what needs to be done to upgrade ballfields at three balanced locations: Afton Hgts. Edgerton and Harvest -The latter was not dealt with extensively because of our tenuous leasing arrangement. Staff has met with District 623 regarding Edgerton. They will upgrade the backstops. Next we considered who has responsibli li ties . for the work to be done . This is a. probable outline: --Community Services will do the design. -- Layout needs a surveyor. Gene Skok, through his work at T . V . I . , can supply us with a student crew and equipment. Excavating: Staff can contract with someone who has the necessary equipment. . -- Liming Because of the cost factor,we prefer ag -lime rather than bryan rock. --Fencing: This can go out for bids. Finally, we established priorites on the needs of the three sites. Afton Starting with diamond #6, skinning and grading is needed. Fencing on the west side 100 ft. down 1st & 3rd base is needed. Edgerton field #6 needs the same work (minus the fencing) as Afton. After #6's are finished, work could progress systematically around each of the remaining 4 diamonds, i.e. at both Afton & Edgerton. Harvest Working with the top crust & liming is all that is feasible for us to do here, Report compiled &, submitted by Rita Brenner- Janisch, chair. 1/21/85 February 5, 1985 Ac. by MEMORANDUM::r.� R D �ro .�.ei._...__..._. To: City Manager Barry Evans From: Di rector of Public Safety Kenneth V. Collins Subject: : Parkin Zone h ��`---� � g o e C ange The Gladstone Community Education Center staff has requested a change in parking restrictions for their Manton Street entrance. They are requesting that one space at the entrance be changed from "Handicapped - One Hour Parking" to "Loading Zone 10:00 a.m. to 12:00. p.m." This change would f aci 1 i`tate the volunteers who pick up meals for thei. r Meals on Wheels program. The vol unteers would also have identification cards in their vehicles to identify them as part of this program. I would recommend that this change be approved and request that you direct this matter to the City Council for approval. KVC:js