HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985 01-28 City Council PacketAGENDA
Maplewood City Council
7:00 P.M., Monday, January- 28, 1985
Municipal Administration Building
Meeting 85 -02
(A) CALL TO ORDER
(B) ROLL CALL
(C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
(D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA
(E) CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are consider '
. 9 considered to be routine by the
City Council and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There
will be no separate discussion on these items. If discussion is desired
that
item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately.
1. Accounts Payable
2. Roseville Watermain Extension
( F) PUBLIC
HEARINGS
1.
7:00
- Rezoning, Street Vacation & Variance:
Frost Avenue to
Walter Street (illularoni)
2.
7:10 -
Code Amendment:
R-3 Storage
3.
7:20 -
Code Amendment:
Fences
4.
7:30 -
Code Amendment:
Swimming Pools
5.
7:40
- Liquor License:
North Maplewood Lions
6.
7:50
- Street Vacation
- S.outh of 1858 Desoto
(G) A14ARD OF BIDS
(H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1.
2.
Rules of Procedure
Purchase Agreement: Lydia /McKnight
(I) NEW BUSINESS
1.
2.
3.
4.
Code Amendment: Trash Container Enclosures (1st Reading)
Annual Report: Planninq Commission
Economic Development Committee
Ordinance on Sewer Rates
(J) VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
(K) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
(L)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
( P1) ADJOURNMENT
i
Minutes of Maplewood Cit y Council
7:00 P.M., Monday, November 26, 1984
Council Chambers, Municipal B u i l d i n g
Meeting-No. 84 -25
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City .Counci 1 of-Maplewood', Minnesota was held d
- in the Council
Chambers,, , M u n i c i p a l Building and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. b y Mayor or Greavu .
B. ROLL CALL
John C. Greavu, Mayor Present
Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present
. Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present
MaryLee Maida, Councilmember Present
Michael T'. Wa s i t uk , Councilmember Present
C. APPROVAL OF M INUTES
1. Minutes No. 84 -22 (October 10, 1984)
Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting o. 84 -22 (October 1n_ papa) ac c,,km; + + ea 9
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all,
D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended:
I. St. Paul Dispatch
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all.
E. CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Greavu moved, seconded by Councilmember Maida, Ayes - all, to . Agenda approve th e Consent
Items 1 throu h 5 as r pp
g r
1. Accounts Payable
Approved the accounts ( Part I, Fees, Services, Expenses, 'Check Register dated November
14, 1984 through November $365,317.27: 9
g 16, 1984 - Part I I , Payroll - Payroll dated
November 16, 1984 - $61,,147.23) in the amount of $426,464.50.
2. Conditional Use Permit Renewal - Gladstone Commun i t y Center
Resolution No. 84 -11 -179
WHEREAS, Independent School District #622 initiated a c o n d i t i o n a l use ermi t to
operate a community enter at the f p
y following owl ng described property:
Gladstone Addition, lots 19 and 20 block 16 • '
,Gladstone Addition, block 17;
Gladstone Plat No. 2, vacant alley adjoining and lots 1 through 6 block 20•
- 1 11/26
Gladstone adstone P 1 at No . 2, in the Village of Maplewood revised description number 181, .
a specific part of NW 1/4 of Section 15 Township 29, Range 22 and lots 11 through
25, block 21; Gladstone Plat No. 2, lots 26, 27 and 28, block 21; and Gladstone
Plat No. 2, E 1/2 of vacant alley adjoining and following lots 29 and 30, block
21.
This property is also known as.1945 Manton Street, Maplewood;
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. This conditional use permit was approved by Council on November 1, 1979 pursuant
to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances, subject to the following conditons:
a. Council may review. any future proposed type of use, not presently in the
Gladstone Community Center, excepting those classes and programs conducted by School
District #622 or other p u b l i c parochial, or private school.
b . Council may review tenant uses *every five years to assure continued general
compatibility with the neighborhood.
c. All b u i l d i n g and fire code regulations must be met and certificate of occupancy
issued for each use.
d. Owner and applicant agree to the above conditons in writing.
2 The Maplewood City Council considered the renewal of this c o n d i t i o n a l use permit
on November 26, 19840
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above described
conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings -of -fact:
1 . The use is in. conformity with the City's Comprehensive P l a n and with the purpose
and standards of this chapter.
2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not'be detrimental to the
public he 1 ath, safety or general welfare.
3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be c o m p a t i b l e
with the character of that zoning district.
1
4. The use would not depreciate property values.
5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential
surrounding land uses, due to the noises, blare, smoke, dust, dust, odor, fumes, water
pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference
or other nuisances.
6. The use would generate only minimal v e h i c u l a r traffic on local streets and shall
not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue
burden to the area properties.
7. The use would be serviced by e s s e n t i a l p u b l i c services, such as streets, police,
fire protection, u t i l i t i e s , schools and parks.
- 2 - 11/26
8 . The use-would not create excessive add i t i ona 1 requirements at public cost for
.public f a c i l i t i e s and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City.
9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features
into the development design.
10. The use would minimal adverse environmental effects.
11. There have not been any complaints received regarding this use.
12. All building and fire code requirements are being met.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1.
Council may review any future use, not presently in the Gladstone Community
Center, excepting those classes and programs conducted by School District #622 or other
public, parochial or private schools.
2. All b u i l d i n g and fire code regulations must be met and a certificate of occupancy
must be issued for each new use.
3. Liquor License - Change of Management: Chuck E. Cheese
Approved the change of management and issue the Chuck E. Cheese Wine and Beer License
in the name of' John David Tidd,
4.. Transfer to Close Workers' Compensation Reserve Fund
Approved a transfer of $4,359.59 from the Payroll Benefit Fund to Workers' Compensation
Reserve Fund to close the latter fund.
5. Destruction of Records
Resolution No. 84 -11 -180
WHEREAS, M.S.A. 475.553 provides for the destruction of cancelled bonds and coupons.
WHEREAS, a request for. destruction of cancelled bonds and coupons dated over six
years has been presented to Council in writing;
NOW, THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that
the City Clerk i s hereby authorized and directed to destroy the cancelled bonds and
coupons.
F. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1, 7:10 P.M. Beaver Lake Drainage
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposed
storm drainage and sanitary sewer system for the Beaver Lake area.
b. Assistant City Engineer Charles Ahl presented the staff report and explained
the specifics of the proposal,
c. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal.
The following were heard:
- 3 11/26
Francis Dreawves, 1060 Lakewood Drive;
Richard Emlon, Bulk Service, Inc. 1300 No. McKnight;
Richard Pearson, owner Rolling Hills M o b i l e Home Park
Roland Vogel, 987 Bartelmy Lane;
Gerald Johnson, 2665 E. Mayrland;
Roland Vogel, 2674 E. Maryland;
Ernest Dreawves., 1070 Lakewood
Harry Zacho, White Bear Lake, Mn.;
Ken Gervais, Castle Design;
William Lorenz, 2659 Stillwater.
d. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
e. Councilmember Bastian moved to table t h i s item until March, 1985 for further
investigation.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - ail.
2. 7:00 P.M. Small Kennel. Permit - 1231 E. Shryer
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request
of Marion F. Newbauer, 1231 E. Shryer, for a small kennel license to house 3 dogs.
b Manager Evans presented the staff report.
c. Mr. and Mrs. Newbauer, 1231 E. Shryer, the applicants, spoke on behalf of the
proposal.
d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard:
Mr. and Mrs. Charles Hinsel, 1212 E. Shryer, stated the problems that the present
kennel has caused.
f. Mayor Greavu -c 1 osed the p u b l i c hearing.
g. Mayor Greavu moved to table until the meeting of December 10, 1985 and refer
the . H irsch' s complaints to the Public Safety, Hea and Building departmen
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
3. 7:20 P.M., IDR - Mogren (2960 Associates Project)
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request
of 2960 Associates Project for a $1,200,'00.0 Commercial Development Revenue Note
of 1984 for the acquisition, construction and equipping of an approximately 15, 000
square foot office bu i 1 d i ng to be located on White Bear Avenue north of Maplewood
East Shopping Center.
b. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
c. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
d. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard.
e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
- 4 - 11/26
f. Counc i lmember Anderson introduced the fo 1 l owl ng resolution and moved its adoption:
84 -11 -181
RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A
COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT
PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA
MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT
AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION
FOR APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT TO THE
ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF
NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS
IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT
WHEREAS,
(a). The purpose of'Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, known as the Minnesota
M u n i c i p a l Industrial Development Act (the "act" ) as found and determined by the
l e g i s l a t u r e is to promote the welfare of the state by the active attraction and
encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to prevent
so far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic
unemployment;
(b) Factors necissitating the active promotion and development of economically
sound industry and commerce are the increasing concentration of population in the
metropolitan areas and the rapidly rising increase in the amount and cost of govern-
mental services required to meet the needs of the increased population and the need
for development of land use which will provide an adequate tax base to finance these
increased costs and access to employment opportunities for such population;
(c) The City Council .of the City- of Maplewood (the"City") has received from
2.960 Associates, a general partnership to be organized under the laws of the State
of Minnesota with Gerald C. Mogren, Robert C. Mogren and Lee Clintsman as general
partners and others to be named (the "Company ") a proposal that the City assist
in financing a Project hereinafter described, through the issuance of a Revenue
Bond or Bonds or a Revenue Note or Notes hereinafter referred to in resolution
as "Revenue Bonds" pursuant to the Act;
(d) The City desires to facilitate the selective development of. the community,
retain and improve the tax base and h e l p to provide the range of services and em-
p l oyment opportunities required by the population; and the Project w i l l as s. i st the
City in achieving those objectives, The Project wi l l he 1 p to increase assessed
valuation of the City and help maintain a positive relationship between assessed
v a l u a t i o n and debt and enhance the image and reputation of the community;
(e) The Company is currently engaged in the business of real estate development.
The Project to be financed by the Revenue Bonds is an approximately 15,000 square
foot office b u i l d i n g to be located on the East s i d e of White Bear Avenue between
Lydia Avenue and Beam Avenue directly North of the Maplewood East Shopping Center
in Maplewood, Minnesota to be leased to Edina Realty and consists of the acquisition
of land the construction of bu i 1 d i ngs and improvements thereon and the i n s t a l l a t i o n
of equipment therein to be i n i t i a l l y owned and operated by the Company, and w i l l
result in the employment of additional persons to work within the new facilities;
- 5 - 11/26
(f) The City has been advised by representatives of Company, that conventional,
commercial financing to pay the capitol cost of the Project is ava i 1 ab 1 e only on
a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility
of operating the Project would be significantly red -uced, but Company has a l s o advised
this Council that with the aid of municipal financing, and its resulting low borrow -
ing cost, the Project is economically more feasible;
(g) Pursuant. to a resolution of the City Council adopted on November 8, 1984,
a p u b l i c hearing on the Project was he'l d on November 26, 1984, after . notice was
published, and materials made a v a i l a b l e for p u b l i c inspection at the City Hall,
all a s required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b at which p u b l i c
hearing all those appearing who so desired to speak were heard;
(h) No public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial
interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly
benefit financially from the Project .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The Council hereby gives preliminary approval to the proposal of Company
that the City undertake the Project pursuant to the Minnesota Municipal Industrial
Development Act (Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes), consisting of the acquisition,
construction and equipping of an approximately 15,000 square foot office building
to be located on the East side of White Bear Avenue between Lydia AVenue and Beam
Avenue directly north of the Maplewood East Shopping Center in Maplewood, Minnesota,
to be leased to Edina Realty pursuant to Company's specifications suitable for the
operations descr i bed above to be initially owned and operated by the Company and
pursuant to a revenue agreement between the City and Company upon such terms and
conditions with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary, so as to
produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the p r i n c i p a l of and interest
on the Revenue Bonds in. the maximum aggregate principal amount of $1,200,000 to
be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping
of the Project.; and said agreement may also provide for the entire interest of Co-
mpany therein to be mortgaged to the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds; and the City
hereby undertakes preliminarily to issue its Revenue Bonds in accordance with such
terms and conditions;
. 2 . On the basis of information available to this Council it appears, and the
Council hereby finds, that the Project cons i tutes properties, real and personal,
used or 'useful in connection with one or more revenue producing enterprises engaged
in any business within the meaning of Subdivision la of Section 474.02 of the Act;
that-the Project furthers the purposes stated in Section 474.01,, Minnesota Statutes;
that the Project would not be undertaken but for the a v a i l a b i l i t y of industrial
bond financing; that the a v a i l a b i l i t y of the f i nanc ing under the Act and willingness
of the City to f urn i sh such f i nanc i ng w i 11 be a substantial inducement to . Company
to undertake the Project, and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will
be to encourage the development of economically sound industry and commerce, to
assist in the prevention of the emergence of blighted and marginal land, to h e l p
prevent chronic unemployment, to help the City retain and improve the tax base and
to provide the range of service and employment opportunities required by the population,
to help prevent the movement of talented and educated persons out of the state and
to areas within the State where their services may not be as effectively used, to
promote more intensive development and use of land within the City and eventually
to increase the tax base of the community;
- 6 11/26
3 . The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by the City subject to
the approval of the Project by the Minnesota Energy and Economic PP Development Authority
or such other state officer having authority to grant approval (the "Authority "),
and subject to f i n a l approval by this Council, Company, and the purchaser of the
Revenue Bonds as-to the ultimate details of the financing of the Project.
4. In accordance with Subdivision 7a , of Section 474.01 Minnesota Statutes,
the Mayor of the City is hereby authorized and directed to submit the proposal for
the Project to the Authority requesting it's approval, and other officers, employees
and agents of the City are hereby autho i rzed to provide the Authority with such
preliminary information as it may require;
5. Company has agreed and it is. hereby determined that any and all costs incurred
by the City in connection with the financing of the Project whether or not the Pro-
ject i s carried to completion and whether or not approved by the Authority w i l l
be paid by Company;
6 Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel is
authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating
to the Project, to consult with the City Attorney,. Company and the purchaser of
the Revenue Bonds as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms and provisions
of the Revenue Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary
documents and to submit such documents to the Council for final approval;
7. Nothing. in th i resolution or in the documents prepared pursuant hereto
shall authorize . the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Pro ject other than
the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this
purpose. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance,
legal or equitable, upon any property or funds of the City except the. revenue and
P pledged payment proceeds led ed to the a ent thereof, nor shall the City be 'subject to any liability
thereon. The holder of the Revenue Bonds shall never have the right to compel any
exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the outstanding principal . on the
Revenue Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any
property of the City. The Revenue Bonds shall recite, in substance that the Revenue
Bonds, including interest thereon, is payable solely from the revenue and prodeeds
pledged to the payment thereof. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a debt of
the City wi thin. the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation;
8. In anticipation of the approval by the Authority the i s sua.nce of the Revenue
Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Project, and in order that completion of
the Project will not be unduly delayed when approved, Company is hereby authorized
to make such expenditures and advances toward payment of that portion of the costs
of the Project to be financed from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds as Company
considers necessary, incl'u'ding the use of interim, short -term financing, subject
to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds if and when delivered but
otherwise without l i a b i l i t y on the part of the City;
9. If construction of the Project is not started wi th.i n one year from the . date
hereof, this resolution shall thereafter have no force and effect and the preliminary
approval herein granted is.withdrawn.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of' Maplewood, Minnesota, this 26th day
of November, 1984.
/s/ John C. Greavu
Mayor
- 7 - 11/26
Attest:
/s/ Lucille E. Aurelius
City Clerk
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes -all.
4. 7:30 P.M., Variance - Clarence Street
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request
of Rosendo E 1 i zondo, 1700 Clarence for a lot width variance to create an 85 foot
wide corner lot.
b. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
c. Commi s s. i oner Lorraine Fischer presented the Planning Commission report.
d.. Mrs. E 1 i zondo, the applicant, spoke on behalf of the request.
e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. The f o l l o w i n g were heard:
Mr. Don Misgen, 1367 Price.
f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard:
Mr. C. Robert Brost, attorney representing Gordon Berres, 1381 Sophia.
g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
h. Counc i 1 member Anderson introduced the f o l l o w i n g resolution ' and moved its adoption:
84 -11 -182
WHEREAS, Rosendo E 1 i zondo applied for a variance for the following-described
property:
The South 133 feet of the North 163 feet of the West 193 feet of the N 112
of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of Section 15, Township 29, Range
22, Ramsey County
This property is a l s o known as 1700 Clarence Street , Maplewood;
WHEREAS, Section 30 -8 of the Maplewood Code or Ordinances requires single-dwelling
corner lots to be at least 100 feet . wide;
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing 84.81 feet of width, requiring a variance
of 15.91 feet;
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows:
1. This variance was applied for on September 28, 1984.
2. This variance was reve ivied by the Maplewood P l a n n i n g Commission on November
5, 1984. The P l a n n i n g Commission recommended to the City Council that said var i a'nce
be approved.
- 8 - 11/26
4
3 . The Maplewood City Council h e l d a public hearing on November 26, 1984 to
consider this variance. Notice thereof was published and m a i l e d pursuant to law..
Ali p ersons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present
written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of
the City Staff and P l a n n i n g Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above -
described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of. fact:
1. Strict enforcement of the zoning code would cause an undue hardship unique
to this property because:
a. The proposed corner lot is similar in width to the majority of developed
corner properties in this vicinity.
b. The e s s e n t i a l character of the l o c a l i t y would be enhanced because the sub -
standard front yard. - setback of the garage would be eliminated.
c. This is the only remaining lot.in this area that is large enough to be con-
sidered for subdivision.
2. The spirit and intent of zoning and subdivision codes would be met because:
a. Approval of th i s request would not reso l t in a sight - triangle distance pro -
b 1 em at the intersection of Sophia Avenue and Clarence-Street,
b. The proposed corner lot would have adequate yard area.
3. Council has recently approved similar corner lot variance requests.
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
5. 7:40 P.M. Street Vacation: Gerva i s - Court
a. Mayor Greavu. convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposed
vacation of a portion of the Gerva i s Court right of way east of White Bear Avenue.
b. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
c. Commissioner Lorraine Fischer presented the Planning Commission report.
d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
e. Mayor Greavu called for 'opponents. None were heard.
f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
g. Counc i 1 member Ma i da introduced the f o l l o w i n g reso l.ut i on and moved its adoption :
84 - 11 - 183
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood's director of public works has initiated these
proceedings to vacate the p u b l i c interest in the following described p u b l i c right
of way:
-9- 11/26
1
That part of the south h a l f of the Gervais Avenue right of way in the NE 1/4
of the NE 1/4 of the SE .1/4 of Section 10, Township. 29, Range 22 lying east of the
northerly extens i o.n of the west line of -the east half of Lot 16, E.G. Roger' s Garden
Lots and 35 feet southeasterly of the center l i n e of Gervais Avenue, said center
1 i,ne being described as f o l l o w s : Commencing at the southeast corner of the Northeast
Quarter of . Sent i on 10, Township 29 North, Range 22 West of the 4th P r i n c i p a l Meridian;
thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 19 minutes 35 seconds West, along
the south l i n e of said Northeast Quarter, a distance of 423.32 feet, to the beginning
of the center line to be described; thence South 89 degrees 19 minutes 35 seconds
East a distance of 100.00 feet; thence easterly and northeasterly, a distance of
493.48 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northwest having a radius of
649.88 feet and a central angle of 43 degrees 30 minutes 25 seconds; thence North
47 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds East, tangent to said curve, a distance of 562.46
feet and said center lien there terminating.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of the vacation application is as f o l l o w s :
1 . That the application for vacation was initiated by the Director of P u b l i c
Works on the 12th day of October, 1984;
2. That said vacation has been referred to and reviewed by the Maplewood Planning
Commission on the 5th day of November, 1984 and referred back to the Maplewood City
Council with the recommendation of approval;
3 . That pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851 a
public hearing was held on the 26th day of November, 1984 preceded by two weeks
published and posted notice at which meeting the City Council heard all who expressed
a desire to be heard on the matter, considered the Planning Commission recommendation
and staff reports thereon.
WHEREAS, that within that portion of Gervais Avenue hereinbefore described and
proposed for vacation, there presently exists certain p u b l i c u t i l i t i e s such as,
but not limited to, sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, gas and telephone;
WHEREAS, . i t s i the express intention of the City to provide direct access from
the hereinafter described real property to Gervais Avenue in a direct, reasonable
and safe manner;
WHEREAS, the City proposes to reserve unto itself a utility easement over, under,
across and through the here i nbefore described portion of Gervais Avenue for the
installation, construction and maintenance of said underground u t i l i t i e s ; and
WHEREAS, upon vacation of the public easement for street and road right of way
to the here i nbefore described property will accrue to the east one-half of the north
one-half of Lot '16, E.G. Rogers'. Garden Lots lying north of the north right of way
line of State Highway Number 36, being also known and numbered as 1771 East Highway
36, Maplewood, Minnesota.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maplewood City Council finds that it
is in the p u b l i c interest to grant the above described vacation, on the basis of
the following findings of fact:
1. The rights of way for street and road right of way purposes are in excess
of public need.
2. That it is in the public interest to return to private ownership lands in
excess of public needs.
- 10 - 11/26
.3. That it is in the public interest to return as much real property in the
City, County and State to the tax rolls as is feasible.
BE IT.FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk be, and hereby is, directed to prepare
a Notice of Completion of the proceedings pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes, Section 412.851 and shall cause the same to be presented to the County
Auditor for entry in the County Transfer Records and that the same shall be there-
after filed with the Ramsey County Recorder, subject to the retention of:
A Permanent public easement for underground utilities over, under, through and
across the entire right of way to be vacated.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - a11.
G. AWARD OF BIDS
1. Maplewood In Motion
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
b. Mayor Greavu I moved to award the contract to Sexton Printing in the amount of
$7,294.55 for four complete issues ot the Maplewood in Motion,
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
H . UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Frost Avenue Improvements
a. Assistant City Engineer Chuck Ah 1 presented the spec i f i c -s of the proposal to
improve Frost Avenue from Birmingham Street to .Adele Street.
b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
84 -11 -184
WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and
directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of Frost Avenue be-
tween Birmingham Street and Adele Street by construction of storm, sewer pond i ng,
piping and necessary appurtenances, concrete curb and gutter and concrete sidewalk;
and
WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the im-
provement herein described:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA,
as follows:
i. The report of the City Engineer advising this Council that the proposed
improvement on Frost Avenue by construction of storm sewers,. concrete curb and
gutter and concrete sidewalks is feasible and should best be made as proposed,
is hereby received.
2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the
reports and assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost
of the improvement according to M.S.A. Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost
of the improvement of $1,44.0,300.00.
- 11 - 11/26
•
3 . A public-hearing w i l l be h e l d i n. the Council Chambers of the City Hall at
i 1380 Frost Avenue on Monday, the 14th day of January, 1985, at .7:30 P.M. to
consider said The City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice
of said hearing and improvement as required by law.
NOTICE OF HEARING OF IMPROVEMENT
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota,
deems it necessary and expedient that the improvement hereinafter described, be
made;
now,, therefore, notice is hereby given that the City Counc i 1 w i l l hold a p u b l i c
hearing on said improvement at the following time and place within the said City:
DATE: January 14, 1985
TIME:
7:30 P.M.
LOCATION: C i ty Hall
Council Chambers
1380 Frost Avenue
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
The general nature of the improvement is the construction of street and storm
sewer improvements in the following described areas: along Frost Avenue between
Adele Street on the west and Birmingham Street on the east and south of the former
Soo Line Railroad to a southern boundary of F Frisbie Avenue and Summer
Avenue.
The total estimated cost of s a i d improvement is $1,440,300.00.
It is proposed to assess every lot, piece or parcel of land benefited by , sa i d
improvement whether abutting thereon or not, based upon benefits received without
regard to cash valuation.
Persons desiring to be heard with reference to the proposed Frost Avenue Improve -
ment should be present at this hearing.
.This Council proposes to proceed under the authority granted by Chapter 429
M.S.A.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers An-
derson, Ma i da and Was i l uk .
Nays - Councilmember Bastian.
2. Building Permit Ordinance
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
b.. Commissioner Lorraine Fischer presented the HRA recommendation.
c. Mayor Greavu introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption:
ORDINANCE NO. 573
AN ORDINANCE EXEMPTING NONSTRUCTURAL CONSTRUCTION WORK
- 12 - 11 /26
f
THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 9 -24 is hereby amended as follows:
Section 9 -24 Permits, inspections and fees
The issuance of permits and conduction of inspections pursuant to t h i s article
shall be as provided for in Chapter 3 of the Uniform B u i l d i n g Code, except that
a building permit shall not be required for nonstructural, r e s i d e n t i a l maintenance
items such as the same s i z e replacement of doors, windows, the first or second layer
of s h i n g l e s , trim or siding. Any fee or charge required to be p a i d to the City
under the City Bu i l ding Code shall be imposed, set, established and f i by the
City Council by resolution or as outlined in Section 304 (amended) UBC Table 3a.
The Building Official shall establish a system for the issuance of required permits
in accordance with the Building Code and Chapter 3.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication.
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
I. NEW BUSINESS
None.
J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
1. Mr. Richard Ernst
a. Mr. Richard Ernst, Century East, requested condition 18 of the Community Design
Review Board report which requires a right turn only lane onto Century be deleted.
b. Mayor Greavu moved to delete the condition for right turn only lane and staff
to report back in six months.
Seconded by Counciimember Maida. Ayes - all.
2. Mr. Larry Benson, 1800 City Heights Drive
a, Mr. Benson stated his neighbor had constructed a fence with the bad s i d e facing
his property. He also asked several questions regarding the placement of a fence.
b. Staff will investigate.
K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. St. Paul Dispatch
a. Mayor Greav'u stated that at several corners where the papers are dropped and
sorted, the newsboys are leaving the wrappers, wires, string., etc, at the site.
b.. Staff w i l l contact the paper,
L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
None.
- 13 - 11/26
M. ADJOUNRMENT
9:46 P.M.
City Clerk
- 14 - 11/26
s
r ,
t
6
MANUAL CHECKS JANUARY
4,1985' thr :
.0
JANUARY 10,1985
e
'
1984 CI T
OF MQ�L: WO
WrCK RLG'ST.R
1lmOJN'
V =VlCO?
:T E'� BCS C�irTA
G.�25�3
r_1/14/QS
21C.''�?
G. .Q.A
T FAV L TP,.V,�'1;
211 # J 3
it *t�f
- 2F_ 5 �
�1 /14/15
SW—:]ISH TySTITUTE
;�
L b "
:;1 /14/S r
155.45
B7CKrc VAr_
��'i:�•
1 56.45
L .:.2No
_1 /14 I 5
11 9465.�J
fl. NN STAT. T SUi R
c ;. V LT L "
/ 5
336.3
M;NN STATE' TR' »SUO.=R
Mr,T 2a V =r L:
11 • ZJ2.5L
C. 13 C4.;
-1 /14 /a5
95 .5 id
CLAR O >I STR COURT
M:,TrP, V_% L I C
95.5?
�.:3 K?..
�.1 /14/F5
1 45.:'0
"KA�ti_ °0S��ARr
,• T
�? � ,.
145 t"
3 1
-1114
171 ,43
MN MUTUAL L.Fi A '
i tipIj : "vL=
3
14/95
3 6
Mill MUTUAL LIFc TNS
�tSj��,��Lc
360 1
;:,1 /1y /R
2,443.
MN MUTUAL LIF" I14S
' U ,Nrl
..1 /14 0 5
31. ;
M ",! N J TU �' L i:�''" 1 ''i S
s 'Ij ►!
� �3L4A1
-1 /14! 5
7 # 3 a3
MM' MJTUAL LIF= IN'S
10
L`.,.3
'.: J
MTAN STAT_ TR =:.S
M:T� V- L:
C
1 /14
259.:1
MIN%. STATE TR= 4S
MZ -? V LTA s
6 9 376.
��4��7
:1/14! °5
1�,� -„
ST. BER,T
T?aV-
16 - - ' D
r'', 4 3L
r �
..1/14/85
30 R. 74
BLUE C40SS
:N •:NC�
f':4c3..,
�.1 /14/35
4l •32
PLUt -' V1JJJ
itii3 ►Jp � t,1C.
t'r4r3..
_1/14/k5
3,956.66
PLU= CRO >j
il:khyC:.
4 ,743 .'2
P-4 e
1984 CITY
O F MA PPL U COD
CHECK REGISTER
DATE
.
VF- NDDR
ITE+" D k1P TT3
�4 C6�:
? 1 /14 /85
83 .95
CfiaGUtiS CC�tFER =l�r=
TvI T: ON
83.95
`�4"+69
r= '111�•/p5
6 50
MINN STAT= TRF:.S
MOTOR V; 14, L'_C a-1
`�
X7/14/85
556 j
MN STAT1E TREAD
MST "J'-? v�H LTC
7
d
7�::
�1 /14/45
3C J
Ra�_V _LL—
TRA
Y .
r ,.l E 64
1 1 /14/
0
EMPLO =E 3ENEFT T
D T4% CLAI��
�;.7N1
1 /14/R5
42.22
i+AGEN AIRLINE
rETTY
42 .?2
- 71 F0
� 1 /1 4 / � 5
6 * uB� �3
MINN SLAT_ TRE►. S
M "T J=� V_ � L' � ra
r,.l
1 /14/ 55
4Ji..rJ
NT�;N STAT= T R =�.S
M ^T�� V.H LIC a .
7 , 2 8 7 . " 5
^8'55
_ 1 /14/35
1 35.::'c
Mt, FOLUTI14 C3'IJTR
TRA )i T -:'l � G
1 35 ... +.
17945
I1:TL CHIc=> >CL.L
B: —
.1 /1 4/ 4 5
1 o `'C
I NTL C+ == = P�L'CE
ca �'" KS
,,,
1 31 .4 5
87W3 ^
r.1 /14/ p 5
1 R.:: C
M.E.l . A
TKA ircL T R C�,'� :'tiG
1 80'
^8M6q
i1 /14/R5
7.312.25
MII�N STAT TR�.AS
elk
MCT3" VEN LI C
69
;.1 /14
396 .31
MI S T AT= TRE
M ^TC +R VEH LiC Qr
9
„1/14/85
451.3
MINK STAT_ TREAS
W.) T J R VEy L1
•` `18 y69
iA /14 /8c 5
291 . .3
!LT NN S TATE TRTA 3
Mi T wR vE N Li C Ai
`,n8M6q
01/141p5
674933
M:NN STIAT - TRFAS
MCTCn VEN LTC P�
9,93 54.25
19B 4 CITY
:: F MAPLEw V%D.
CHECK RElTST
Z . K f.1
J TE
17 0E .stir .,
{
c5 =
�.1 /1 4/ 5
1 ��� =.C�
r �STMIST=I
��;5 ?A �=
1 �Cj -4._
�9;. is
r 1 /14 / 5
35 *'j
QRGG CANT =O
To; =V_i
35 • 2 J
C9m2..
"1 /14/ =
11 6,?76.1 1
METP5 WASTE C 9r1TR
C V T CT cY
116,76.1 1
r -.9 1059
=.1 I14 1 5
5,32:, .75
Mi NN STAT= TAE S
M�TOR V =� LT
5 •320.75
9 w5y
':.1 /14/r 5
2 ?2.��
Ml%M STAT: TREAS
M T Z) MR V::+� Li C �.
272.:3 t
_ �9 l
1 /1 4 �F,
6 7
MN ST TREAS Olm
a '?L
9M76
�1 /14 /F5
8
MN ST TiREAS P:7
P_nA BL
1S ,
�1: C4�.
�1 /14/��
12
CLERK O= SOJRT
Dill L'_C CLJ
127.50 +�
�1 Mb9
`1 /14/
6 t5 P602 5
1Miy�f STaT� T�� S
MST v:R V L' C
1 ". M6'�
�1 /74/35
175•'J
1'gINN STiAT� TREAS
M�T�R V =�A L: C.
6,761.25
769798.43
FUV) 11 TOTAL
G L.
FUNr) 9^ TOTAL
S ., i 1T;RY SEW =-
71 9 987,49
FUND 92 TOTAL
FAYR ='LL E-tt =F:T
1 ♦ JJC..
FUND 94 T T A L.
J VTAL S .LF — : k
21) 7.797.J3
TOTAL
NECESSARY
EXPENDITURES SINCE
LAST COUNCIL
MEETING
f
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE -
JANUARY 28,1985
(JAN. EXPENSES)
PAGE 1
_
1985 CITY
OF MAPLE'YOOD
CHECK REbIST'
-R
�MFCK N09
DATE
e1MflJNT
V: V00
ITEM -:
DESCRIPT..
U28006
01/16f85
15e00
MN STAT;:, FIRE CHIEFS
-
MEMBcRSHIP
159'0
.f.
iJ28TJ07
0.1/16/85
33300
ST P4UL R :C DEPT
- KI L A SS C'US
33Q.3 �! *
028, .91
�1 /16/85
22.50
A -1 3USIN:SS MACHIV
CONTRACT PyM
22,05 0
023126
J1 /16/85
43950
DON bKALMAV FiK_AR4S
SUPPL
Li
43.50 *
028411
01/16185
26000
HENNEPIN COUNTY
TRAVEL TRA INING
260. ^0
: *f :tom
028T12
U1 /16/85
55
TWE3T DJ.VA_D
TRAVEL TRAINING
55, 9? •
025720
i 1 /16/8 5
55. 9?
EASTLUN3 ? C*i R
I A..D
TRAVEL TRAINING
5 5.. 9? •►
U23813
D.1 /16/85
4D.00
NATL CCDR! NATO
j •N�
�
McMBcRS�li�
40 *CD
028811
u i /16/85
210. ^0
y S -
N to TZ FIRE
MEMBERSHIP
210. ?0 #
023812
0.1/16/85
29800.00
- �.
L..- A6l= DF '!N CITIES
SU9SCRIPTICN
29800003
028813
01/16/85
20 0
JDH'USe. r
'V DORD, HY
R E FU'VD
20. ^ 0 *
028814
i}1 /16/85
38403
IDENT- K T
I
384.]0 *
REP AIR MA INT
028815
01/16/85
14.95
FIRE T
I E G_V_ERINC
MT46ERSHIP
14.45 f
028816
01/16/85
18000
SCHR3 ED ER LOUI SE
REFUND
18.00
I
i
e ..
1985 CITY
)F NAPLEWCO3
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK N0.
DATE
AM)UNT
VE40OR
ITEM DESCRIPT:pt
028A50
01/16/85
48.3,D
AMERICAN iATER WORKS
MEMBERSHIP
48.00 +�
02 8B45
01/16/85
140.00
8)AR) IF JATEtR COMM
UTILITIc "S
#•t *tom
026B48
A/16/85
1 5.84
80Y_3 tRU.K HAR
SU�PLTES VET+
15.84 t
02852
'-1 /16/85
91.50
CLUT3i 9 U JOINT
SUP'PLTES VEM
91.50
028E25
;w1 /16/85
585.9T
E K 2UEHL
OFFIC- SUP PLIES
585.9T
028G55
C1/16/85
459]3
s.F•),IC•
MEMB:.RSHTP
45.00 #
028'K55
01/16/85
189,
K40X LUMB -R
SUPPLIES
189.]g
a :
U23L70
31/16/85
1 9 506.2g
LnGI> '
)P CHARGES
U2bLTR
01/16f85
1 * ^9]•41
LOGIS
Op CHARGES
U25LI O
31/16/85
799.S3
L0GI.
DP CHARGES
02BL70
01/16/65
545.20
LOGIS
DP CHARGES
3.941 .+ 9
028
01/16/85
7.5]
MN ASSOC )c CIVIL
M= MS. ?P
7.53 •
028N20
C1/16/85
13.55
NEEDELS CO
SUPPLIES
13.55
02883.9
11/16185
166.95
RAMS -Y C0JNTV
SUPPLIES
P e . -.3
A 0 ,
1985 CITY )F MAPLEWOOD
CHECK NO* DATE
026SO2
i
028 S 05
02 6 SI.5
i
ftf�t t
026'T42
023'W40
ittt *!
9
028'W60
02 ts W 90.
a
a
d
3.1/16/135
0.1/16/8
01/16/85
U.1/16/85
'1/16/85
01 /16/8 5
.x.1/16/85
CHECK REGISTER
AM)U4T
i E'IDO?
ITEM DESCRIPTIO",
166. X35
S&D L3 &SAFc
SUPPLIES
7.3.3
2 ? * 12
S & T OFFICE
SUPPLIES
94.2 4
S b T 0= F' CE
SUPPLIES
123.36
981070
TELEsT:lM-'VA,.S
COMP MAINT
981 .3 3
3
W -8EI L- ' :TRIC
R =DAIR MAINT
3,553. )J
85* 3B
WESC O
SUPPL IES
85.3!
133984
w W ;RAMIGER
SUPPLIES
133.84
9 ,
FU43 31 TOTAL
GENERAL
48
FUWD 03 TOTAL
HY3PANT CHARGE
3,
FUID 11 TOTAL
PARK DEVELOPM =N'
1 9 479e64
FU43 9 TOTAL
SANIT SEW =F f
107.34
FU43 96 TOTAL
V =M:CLE b EQU'P
14 *395 .2 5
TOM
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE -
JANUARY 28 ,1985
C198�+ Expenses)
PA e. l
1984 CITY
3F MAPLEW003
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK Hv.
DATE
AMOU1
V =ND 01
ITEM DESCRIPTI
02 S:, 2 5
01/15/85
55 • R2
MIDWEST GREAT JANE
SUPPLIES
55.92 t
026187
G1/15/85
22.A2
MN T)RO MC
SUPPLIES
22.82
026314
L1 /15 /85
215913
EKBL4n! PAI DEE_
CDNT TACT PYM
215.30
Qc8 325
D1 /15/85
52.53
MILL= R /DAiIS
90OKS
52.53
028656
01/15/85
49.8D
R= HINT04 AJTD
SUPQLl'ES
49.80 t
:• :mot•
028739
91/15185
27.68
THUya LLA DAVID
TRA VEL TRAIN ityG
27.68
028751
01/15/85
•44
M.C.I.
TELEPHONE
.44 t
(316192
ill /15 /85
4
MOGR =N ZERALD
REFUND
4,300 •
026198
LJ1/15/85
19333.33
RICH %RD NORDLUND
REFUND
1 9333.33
0Z 68137
U1 /15 I P5
2A0 5
RJK MRI NT' NG
BROCHURE S
274.15
0 286nt8
01/15/85
10510
RI HM M OT01 CO
REPA MA A. VE
028808
01/15/85
1 fD.55
RIHM MOT01 CD
REPAIR MAINT WEP
179.34
7 ?8809
01 /15/85
175
Wl STAR VATEIWORKS
SUPPLIES
IT5.88
92881''.
C1/15/$5
137•CQ
R E FRITZ
REFUND
PA�e : a
CHECK. REGIST =R
V= NDOR ITEM DES CR �P T' 0!
FEDERAL EvvRESS DELIVERY
ACE 4 OV' SUPPLIES
ACE HOJ SU PPLI_�
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT b T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
A T 9 7
AT & T
AT & t
AT 8 T
AT & 'r
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT b T.
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TEL EPH ONE
T E L E P -13N. E
TELEPHON
TELEPHONE
TEL EPHONE
T= LEP4ONE
T ELiP HON E
TELEPHONE
T ELEPHONE-
T;- L =Pw0NE
TE LEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TEL EP HDN E
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHON
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
T 'L EPt40N E
TEL ►P HON E
TEL =PHONE
TE. LEPH0N E
TELE
TELEPHONE
80YE1 TIRUCK PARTS
8R 3 YV ;*MOT O
SUPPLIES YEN
SUPPLI
193 "4 CITY
OF MAPLE WOOD
CHECK N0.
DATE
AMOUNT
1 37.0 0
02881 1
C.1 /15/8 5
25939
25.0 0
Ol bAj 1
Ul /1S /85
4501
020AU1
U1/15/85
64e29
109•sr
U28A75
C1 /15 /85
41o62
02BA75
;l1 /15/85
10.72
028'A 75
01/15/85
4.56
026A15
L1/15/85
5.36
026 A15
0 1 /15 /8 5
140.97
0.26A75
01 /15/85
16.1.8
023'A 7 5
J.1 115 /8 5
2.90
Q28A75
01/15/85
10.72
026A75
C 1 /15 /85
27.92
02 -A 75
01115/85
298.20
02bA 75
01/15/85
17.10
1
02SA 75
01 /15 /8 5
151 .1 2
G26AT5
1 /15/85
5936
0ZbA75
01115 /85
15.04
026A15
J1/15/85
100
026A75
1/15/85.
64.62
U23 7 5
.3 1 /1 5/85
0.2bA75
01 /15/85
44 *69
028A75
01 / 15 /85
5.36
028'A75
)1/15/85
ROB
028'AT 5
;:1 /15 / 8 5
52.34
C28A75
01 /15 /85
5.36
026A75
C1 /15/85
19013
02BA T5
U 1 /15 /85
57.t 1
02b Al5
01 /1 5f 8 5
24704
0 28A7 5
01 /15/85
10.72
028A/5
01/15/85
5.36
028'A75
01 /15/85
5.36
02t3A75
C1 /15 /85
5.36
02bA75
31/15/85
9
026A/5
0)/15/85
5036
028A75
31/15/85
13.78
1 9 380.20
028848
01/15/85
4
4.1 5
028855
U1 /15 185
48.30
CHECK. REGIST =R
V= NDOR ITEM DES CR �P T' 0!
FEDERAL EvvRESS DELIVERY
ACE 4 OV' SUPPLIES
ACE HOJ SU PPLI_�
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT b T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
A T 9 7
AT & T
AT & t
AT 8 T
AT & 'r
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT b T.
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TEL EPH ONE
T E L E P -13N. E
TELEPHON
TELEPHONE
TEL EPHONE
T= LEP4ONE
T ELiP HON E
TELEPHONE
T ELEPHONE-
T;- L =Pw0NE
TE LEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TEL EP HDN E
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHON
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
T 'L EPt40N E
TEL ►P HON E
TEL =PHONE
TE. LEPH0N E
TELE
TELEPHONE
80YE1 TIRUCK PARTS
8R 3 YV ;*MOT O
SUPPLIES YEN
SUPPLI
a
*
165.93
1984 CITY
OF MAPLE WOOD
165.90
*
325.75
,+ECK NJ.
DATE
325.75
+
19.33
CHTP
3wRINr5
19.30
026033
51/15/85
6979
02aC36
111 /15 /85
27920
C!)UNr R Y
C. U3
33.99
020C4
Ll /1 /8),
130951
DALCO
130.51
UZOC90
.:1 /'15/85
7.7 5
023'C90
0.1/15/85
5 D^. 3 3
DEPT 3F
P UB6 I C SFT Y
500.30
25.0 :D
EAS TMAN
028030
L1/15185
EASTMAN
KODAK CO
750.3
EASTMAN
K03AK CO
462.73
EAST M4 4
028D37
U1/15 /85
EASTMAN
KODAK CO
12 .51
E AST4A N
02604 U.
3.1/15/85
EASTMAN
KODAK CO
200.''9
EASTMAN
K30AK CO
1 9 250.54
t
026EC7
L1/15/85
F48RA- .'vRAv4jc3
028E07
01115/85
U26ED7
01/15/85
U26tT7
U.1 /15 /8 5
028*EG7
01/15/85
C215EO.7
U1115/85
U28E ?7
Ul/15/65
U2 dE0,7
L'1/15/85
028F03
Cif /15/85
Ro, e 3
0
CHECK REGIS T= R
AMOUNT V =1ID04 ITEM DESCRIPTI
48.30
*
165.93
CAPITOL
SJPPLY
165.90
*
325.75
CARE ANIMeL
CONTROL
325.75
+
19.33
CHTP
3wRINr5
19.30
•
6979
COUNTRY
CLUB
27920
C!)UNr R Y
C. U3
33.99
130951
DALCO
130.51
�
7.7 5
DATA OI SPAT CH:Nb
T.75
5 D^. 3 3
DEPT 3F
P UB6 I C SFT Y
500.30
25.0 :D
EAS TMAN
KODAK CO
12.5 1
EASTMAN
KODAK CO
750.3
EASTMAN
K03AK CO
462.73
EAST M4 4
K) 34K CO
262961
EASTMAN
KODAK CO
12 .51
E AST4A N
KODAK CO
200. ^q
EASTMAN
KODAK CO
200.''9
EASTMAN
K30AK CO
1 9 250.54
t
571.53
F48RA- .'vRAv4jc3
571o50
t
SUP P L. TES
ANI MAI C ONTR tiL
WATER COJLE�
SUPPLIES
PR O n SUP PLI E S
SUPPLIES
DE'L: RY
CONTRACT PYM
DUPLICAT COS
DUPLICATING CC'S
DUPLI ; AT ING CGS
DUPLICATING COS
DUPLICATING CTS
DUPLICATING C^S
DUP LICAT ING COS
DUPLICATI CO 'S
PROG SUPPLIE' S
Ll
y
19F4 CITY
3F MAPLEWOOD
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO•
DATE
AMOUNT
V= NJO?
ITEM DESCRIPTI O.
L28S17.
0.1/15/85
26,50
E & t S VtCES
UNIFJ3MS
o2BG�~
L
25.50
G 9 K SERVICES
UNIF3RMS
-
L12KG1:
C.1 /15/8 5
26950
G & K S =P VICE S
UNIFORMS
02KG1'.
C1/15/85
26950
G 9 K SERVICES
UNIFORMS
U28G12
31/15f85
28.10
G 9 K SERVICE'S
UNIF3RMS
028G1''
01/15/85
19.2
G 9 K SERVICES
UNIFO ?MS
G28G1 "..
01/15/85
19.23
S & K SERVICES
UNIFORMS
l26 G1
i l /15 /85
19.20
6 & K SERVICES
UNIFORMS
02 S G1 ,
U 1 115 /85
19, 20
G & K SERVI CE S
UNI F IR MS
U28 G1"
� 1115/8 5
19.20
G & K SERVICES
UVIFOrMS
02802
01 /1 5/85
1 9.20
G & K SERVICES
UNIFORMS
-
U26 G12..
:j.1 /15'/85
19.23
G & K SERWI GES
UN FORMS
C28 Gtr
0.1115 /85
19.20
G & K SERVICES
UNIFORMS
U2 8G1''
1 /15/85
19.20
G & K SERVICE S
UNTFOKM
L2tsG1
L 1 /15 /85
19.20
G & K SERrI CAS
UNI FOR
U2 &G I
Cl/15/85
18600
G 9 K SERVIC S
UNIFORMS
G28G1
[
1Iq .00
G & K SERVICES
UNIFOPMS
023 Glr
/15/85
18.00
6 9 K SERVICES
U'4IFORMS
02 i s G1 ) .
1 /15 /85
1 8. i 3
G & K 5 ER V I CE S
U% FO'. MS
C28G1'-
L1115 /85
1 8 0 0 0
G & K SERVI CFS
UNIFORMS
416.10 •
028 G4 U,
01 /15/85
235.50
GOOD IN CO
SUPPLIES
2 35.5 0
028"H7 0
59 /15 /8 5
5.67
HORSV =LL JUDITH
TRA V_L TRAIN
5.61T
r
!!! ♦ t
028131
1/15/85
22.70
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
BOJKS
02601
01/15/85
1.20-
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
BODKS
21.50
028L36
01 /1y /85
26. R1
LEES AJTO SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
02BL36
01/15/85
1202
LEES AUTO SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
026 L 3 6
J1 /1y /85
130' 4
L:.LS AUTO SUPPLE
SU ;PLIES
02BL36
01/15/85
30'5
LEES AUTO SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
52.92 +►
02SM97
01/15f85
54.13
MUNI CI L IT: CO
SUPPLIES
021SM97
u1/15/85
54900
MU NI�ILIT= 0
SUPPLIES
02BM9r
U.1 /15/85
49.50
MUNISILIT_ CO
SUPPLIES
157.53
'�. TY
193 CI
OF MAPLE wO03
CHECK REGISTER
r
CHECK N7•
DATE
AMOJNT
V ^NDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
626 pp7
0/15 185
76053
PlOF_SSI014L PROCESS
AMB .SILLS
76.5 0 t
u2bR4c
C-1/15185
141 •3D
RICEE STRE::T CAR WASH
CAR WASH
t41.A
028R49
�' 15/85
� /
56.n0
28.75
RIA3 R :SCJE
- c
ROAD R_S..J_
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
CL8R49
�:1 /15185
114 .7 5
1 „
0.2tiS2.5
1 5
_1 / 5/8
152.42
S& T O=FT::
;; g T OFFICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
OZhS ^5
01/15/85
6.�2
S & T OFFICE
SUPPLIES
02&S °�5
C11/15/95
060-
36.40
S & T OFFICE
SUPPLIES
02 8S�.5
Cl /15 /85
l.1 2
S & T OFFICE
SUPPLIES
OZ 8 S0.5
`.1 /15 /85
3.10
S& T O =F TCE
SUPPLIES
c
02g _ �5
C.1 /15/8 5
9.23
S & T OFFICE
__
SUPPLIc5
02 8505
C-1/15185
C.1 /15/85
1T.20
S & T 3 FICE
SUPPLIES
3” 05
0Z S
g 35
02 S
G1 /15 /85
1 .�8
S & � OFFT CE
n r
SU. PLI..S
SUPPLIES
0 ?857
C,1/15/85
145.27
1 1. ?D
S 6 T OFFICE
S & T OFFICE
Sul P. LIE S
02SS�?5
0'1 /15x85
4?5.I3
S & T OFFICE
9C KC ASE
028S05
L1 /15/ ?5
872.21
QL t3 S o t
j .1 / 15 /85
8504
SC IEV C E MJ SEJ M 0; MV
SUPPLIES
85.14 *.
O28S5 S
L1/15/85
15303
SPECI %LTY RADIO
SUPPLIES
15v.�0 t
U26W,
16 /85
Cl /16/85
62.4 -
ST 2 41,JL HOTEL
ST PAUL H'-TEL
FUEL OIL
FU.- OIL
U26S60
L I /16/8 5
62.40
.40 t
6 67
02 S
U1 /1 5/85
2T.2D
ST PAJL ST% MP WORKS
SU °PLIES
27.20
028S82
3i /15/85
34..3.2
ST AT. )F yM DOT
CONTRACT PYM
�z
1984 CITY
JF MAPLE W03)
CHECK REGIST =R
CHECK N09
DATE
AMOUNT
v N3 1 31
ITEM DESCRIPT10
0
34.32
028S9D.
C 1/15/85
3404
SUPERA1
SUPPLIES
U2 S90
4 /16 /85
17.50
SUPER AMEQ iC
FUEL 11L
U26S9C
%J1 /16/85
4.37
S U r-E R A MER ICA
FUE L OIL
U26 S9^.
WA /16/85
11.53
SUpE2A%&ERICA
FUEL OIL
026S90
01/16/85
13076
SUPER AM to
FUEL OIL
02 8S9U.
C1 /1 6/8 5
19.50
SUPERAME °ICA
-FU= L OIL
026S90-
�11 /15 /85
22.?0
SUP= IA 'IEQICA
FUEL OIL
025S90
u1 /15/8'5
16.5R
SUPEIAMERICA
FUEL OIL
U2 6 S 92
C1/16'1�5
31.19
SUPER4RERICA
FUEL OIL
U2bS90
01/15/85
17.46
SU P ER, A M:P ICA
FUEL OIL
U26S9^,
i1 /16185
146.59
SUFERA4E °tCA
FJE OIL
U28 S9r
&j.1 /15185
54.69
SJPEI AMER TCA
FUEL OIL
U26S90
U1/16185
14. 1 00
SJPEIARE A
FUEL OIL
02oS90,
u1/16185
1690.05
SUPERA 'AE RTCA
FUEL CIL
U25S9^
L1/16185
119.n3
SUPER AMERiCA
FUEL OIL
U26SQt7
01/16/85
31 93''
SUPER A ItERI C A
FUEL CIL
U2aS9n
x,1116185
15000
SJPr-IAMEPICA
FUEL OIL
QZ6S90
01/16185
49.61
SUPEIAME °ICA
FU_L 1IL
U20 cqn
hil /16185
23.60
SJPE1AMERTCA
FUEL ^IL
U26S9�
w1/16/85
24olO
SUPER A
FUEL OI L
028S9L'.
::.1 /16/85
299�A
SUPERAMERI :A
FU-:'L OIL
02 c S90
u1 / 16 185
25 .
SUoFR AMERT CA
FUEL CIL
u26S9C
J1/161R5
55.60
SU`FRAME °ICA
FUEL OIL
U26S90
X1/16/85
11.00
SUPERAMECICA
FUEL �'�IL
025 S9J
"
9000
SUPER A M =R ICA
FUEL CIL
U26S90
�7 /16/85
27.00
SUPERA%E ?iCA
FUEL CIL
J28S90
1.-1 /16 /85
35 930
SUP_RAMERICA
FUEL OIL
0.28'S9a
0.1 /1618
13900
SUPERAMERI:A
FU =L OIL
U26S9n,
61/16185
62.40
SUPERAMERICA
FUEL OIL
U2oS9 ;
61/16/9-5
57.15
SUFEZ AMERICA
FUEL OIL
U28S9n
+:1116185
19?3
S'UPERAMERICA
FUEL OIL
UZOS
61/16/85
31 9 5 Q
SU A MECICA
FUEL OIL
U26S9
U1 /1618 5
43979
SUp£RAMERI CA
FUEL QIL
U26S90
i1 /16/8 5
13.03
SUPERA MEPICA
FUEL OIL
0.25S9n
;..1/16/85
39.98
Sjvr1AMrRI4LA
�U'L CIL
i
U28S90
U1 /16185
32950
SUPERAMERICA
FJ =L OIL
1.332.37
026T3C, "
f.1 /15 /85
51 9 27
TARGE
PRQG SUP PL L
028T30
01/15/85
27.56
TARGET
02BT30
U1 /15/85
13091
TARGET
9T.74
S
026142
21/15185
20.00•
TELE- TEZM?NALS
CONTRACT
FYM
026T42
L.1/15185
43933
TELE•TERMI'NALS
CONTRACT
PYM
02K'T42
El/15/85
2000
TELE- T= RMINALS
CONTRACT
PYM
028142
C-1 /1 5/8
10.00•
TELE•T EI MI NALS
CONTRACT
PYM
P4d e -. 7
CHECK REGISTER
�_ NOOK ITEM DES CRIPTI Or
THINSS REyrMBLR.ED SUPPLIES
TNOMO S3 N ENTERPRI SUPPLIES
TOLL. W9 -LDI4G SUPP SUPPLIES
TRUCK JT I_ITI ES MFG SUPPLIES
TRUCK UT I_ I TI ES MFG SUPPLIES
TRUCK UT TLITIES MFG SUPPLTES
TWIN CITY IDW
T W`4 CITY MOW
TWIN y; ' NDW
SUPPLI_S
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
UNIFORMS
UNLIMITED
UNIFORMS
JNLIMITED
UNIFIRRS
193 CITY
DF MAPLE W003
JNLIMITED
UN I FO RWS
JNLIMITED
UNTFORNS
UNLIMITED
UNIFORMS
CHECK NO.
DATE
AIs0JNT,
UNIFORMS
UNLIMITED
UNIFORMS
JNLIMITED
UNIF ?RKS
UNLIMITED
UNIFgRMS
UNLIMITED
UNIFORMS
023T44
0.1/15/95
5 *CO
UNIFORMS
JNLIMITED
UNIF3RKS
5:53
UNIFORMS
UNLIMITED
UNIFORMS
UNLIMITED
028T45
G1 /15 /85
37.66
T
�
37.66
Y=
U2 6 T6n.
u 1 /15 /85
30e75
30 . '' 5
02 FT 3
01115 f.8 5
32994
02KT8C
[.1 /15/85
2a9.
028
C1 /1 5/8 `_
401.65
723.5 9 t
r
028795
u1 /15 /85
66.36
Q2 3 T 95
61/15/85
1 36.5 0
028T95
1.1/15/85
56.44
259.30
023050
01/16/35
53.04
028'U50
01/16/85
2105
z ..
028050
01/16/85
13995-
U260
.:1 /16/85
137.32
U28U50
^1 /16/85
18.45
`
028U50
r1 /16/85
20.65
C,2:sU>0
J1/16/85
15.x5
U2 8 U5 0
01/16/85
18.4 5-
02800
31116/85
22.42
U2800
01/16/85
21.87-
028U5 u
3 1/16/85
38060
0.28050
01 /16/85
119954
028050
61/16185
148.40
U26U50
0.1/16/85
150.20
Q28U50
01/16/85
249.90
028'U5U
01 /16/85
2105
02ts U5 0
5-1/16/85
1249.95•
u28U50.
u1 /16/85
351.13
1 9 1 a5 .3 5
02 8W21
J 1 /16 /85
91
028 W2l
0.1116/85
3.90
CHECK REGISTER
�_ NOOK ITEM DES CRIPTI Or
THINSS REyrMBLR.ED SUPPLIES
TNOMO S3 N ENTERPRI SUPPLIES
TOLL. W9 -LDI4G SUPP SUPPLIES
TRUCK JT I_ITI ES MFG SUPPLIES
TRUCK UT I_ I TI ES MFG SUPPLIES
TRUCK UT TLITIES MFG SUPPLTES
TWIN CITY IDW
T W`4 CITY MOW
TWIN y; ' NDW
SUPPLI_S
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
UNIFORMS
UNLIMITED
UNIFORMS
JNLIMITED
UNIFIRRS
UNLIMITED
UNIFORMS
JNLIMITED
UN I FO RWS
JNLIMITED
UNTFORNS
UNLIMITED
UNIFORMS
JNLIMITED
U'4IF3R%S
JNLI M: TED
UNIFORMS
UNLIMITED
UNIFORMS
JNLIMITED
UNIF ?RKS
UNLIMITED
UNIFgRMS
UNLIMITED
UNIFORMS
JNLIMITED
UNIFORMS
UNLIMITED
UNIFORMS
JNLIMITED
UNIF3RKS
UNLIMITED
UNIFORMS
UNLIMITED
UNIFORMS
UNLIMITED
WARNERS TRUE VALU
W A RNI R 6 TRUE VALU
UNI F On.MS
UAIFJRMS
UNIFORMS
UNIFORMS
UNIFORMS
UNIFORMS
UNIFO
UNIFORMS
UNIFOP.MS
UNIFORMS
UN
UNIFORMS
UNIFORMS
UNI FORMS
UNIFORMS,
UNIFORMS
UNIFORMS
UNI FORMS
SUP PL ES
SUPPLIES
Pale . Y
4
1984 CITY
OF HAPLEWOn)
CmECK. REG IST_R
CMECK ND.
DATE
AMOJNT
NO
OK
ITEM DES RIPTION
028*W21
01 /16/8 5
54 55
ARN =R6
TI.UE VALU:
SUPPLLES
028*21
U1/16/85
3 59
R4
TRUE VA
UPPLIE1
C.23'W2
C28W21
X1116/85
01116/8
6 2?
9T
W N"R6
WA :-'RS
TRUE LU
TR U VALU
S P.LIEk
SU , LIES S
O26 W21
/1b 5
92
WAR IS
TR VALU
SUP I S
02bw2i
u1 /85
�► 5 14
WARML S
J VALU
SUPPL . S
02 8 W 21
0 16 5
43 41
WARN-
RJE VALU
SUPPL ES
026 W21
,.1 /1618
51 7
YARN:
TRUE VALU
SUPP I
026 W21
1 /1 6/85
31 7
WAR _RS
Z UE VALU
SUP I
028W21
01/16/85
2
W N: RS
T UE VaLU
SU t'LIES
U2b
Ul /16f8 5
1 .'?
YARNrR6
TA E VALU
PPL:E'S
W21
U1/16/85
3 .G8
WARNE
TRU VALU
SUPPLIES
51 •73
14 •859• aT
FUVD
11 TOTAL
GENERAL
9.93
FUND
03 TOTAL
HYDRANT
CHA' G-
T86.9T
FUND
9TH TOTAL
SANITaRV.
SEWEq F
2•-018.71
FUV3
96 TOTAL
VEHICLE
8 EOU:P
17,
T:�TAL
s
r�
INDICA�'ES
IT ,11S 'INANCED BY RLCREAT ",')
\AT FEEES
p
CYCL 6026 CHECK OAT= 0111.85 PERIOD ENDING 01.34.85 PAGE 1
CHECK• NO
AMOUNT
CITY OF Mk F4LEWOOD"
S
'AYROLL•CNECKS 2: GI STER
0108.00001
3-E -NO
E11 --10
EMPLOY LAME
j
0002
484369$11
BED!
t
3.072
206242118
VA13
1 •769.01
TO
J
0313_
473654474
JAHN
� iR
SORT
0310.
.473913147
JOH4S39
g l
30,13.
469586523
SdANS09 , wJZ*
010 8 -00 005
495o94
t
0010
577e38*
3332
357343) 66
CUBE
0108 -00006
3332
47052 3124
OONERI1f
NLEEN
33.12
471403906
ZUER'.1IER
t
00,12
N
L
310 8-40 008
3,021
469531378
FAUST
0321
46474371 9
MEYE1
,-
,.
IEL '
F
�
0.022
469233614
H %GEI
.�
0012
390444446
M.AT4E VS
t x
0322
4FSY04432
MOELLER
3322
4733!7550*
VIG14LO
INE
J
0 0.2 2
501 *49
t
NA
0031
471322198
AURELIUS . _.
� ij,►
1 .... _- �_ ._.... ..... _
vARET
A
0108= 00013
437 *36
0 031
I
,SRES
A
0.033
4Tt248389
GREET
i
0033
472244994
HENSLEY
1 9 901 * 74
0033
476623547
KELS_r
E
3933
4762698.15
SCHA3T
0033
469364435
VIETOR
857.90 *
3333
'LLI
C
3334
4T409T528
STOIIL.:Mrr1
I
0034
A
0108.00017
'H fly
{ i
3041
-
468461 T1 T
COLLINS
4Y
, j
33.41
4?? 369263
MARTI NSON
1NNE
L
0041
475323183
NELSON
�.,
tRAINE
30.41
4 T72Z T636
OMATN#
t
1
00,41
471$32356
RIC41E
1
_
3041
4 6863 2.9 34
SVENDSEN
O1 D 8 -000 21
3341
t x
*
INET"
V
0108.00022
1 21 * 78
t
1
CYCL 6026 CHECK OAT= 0111.85 PERIOD ENDING 01.34.85 PAGE 1
CHECK• NO
AMOUNT
CLEARED
S
N
0108.00001
476.29
t
1
R Y
-R
3108-00002
1 9 2 92.72
t
1 •769.01
TO
J
010 8 -w00003
S1 * 44
c
SORT
R
0108- 00004
0000
t K
E
E
010 8 -00 005
495o94
t
577e38*
Rr
J
0108 -00006
183.74
1
NLEEN
M
0198m90007
114.85
t
1
N
L
310 8-40 008
109.45
c
1
40 8.04 +
,.
IEL '
F
0106 =00009
19089010
t
le
E
0
0000
t x
I
1.08 9.1 O •
. _ ..
... ___ .._. _ -- - .... _ ..... _._ _
INE
J
0108 -00011
501 *49
t
NA
K
010 8 -0 0 012
4 8 6* 9 7
1 .
1 .... _- �_ ._.... ..... _
vARET
A
0108= 00013
437 *36
t
I
,SRES
A
0108 -00014
_ 475.92
1 9 901 * 74
,ILLE
E
0108-4001
857090
U.
857.90 *
'LLI
C
01 8 -00016
592.29
c
I
"RICIA
A
0108.00017
189.90
t
.
INIE
L
0108.00018
33506
t
I
1NNE
L
0108w00019
177.48
t
1
tRAINE
S
0108.1!0020
453 *28
t
1
1 ��48 * 31 •
TN
6
O1 D 8 -000 21
0
t x
*
INET"
V
0108.00022
1 21 * 78
t
1
tOL
F
0108 -00023
351 *47
t
1
3E RT
0
010 8.00024
692.39
t
1
r
E
0108 -00025
395 *27
t
t0L
L
0106-00026
380 *67
t
!.NNE
P
0108 -o00027
516.61
t
2 * 4 5 8.19
•
CITY OF MA P'LE WOOD PATI OLL• CH-",.(S t E G[ S T EZ
DE EMPL•NO E4PL)rE1E VAME
6YCLE 8326 CHECK DATE DI -11 -85 PERIOD ENDING 01 - -85 PAGE
Ct1ECK -N0 AMOUNT CLEARED
2
3 30.42 477481364 ARN3 .D DAVID L 3138•D002B 1 01.54 t )
0042 471432115 ATC41 S JN JOHN H 010 8 -00029 743.52 t )
9 0042 476721577 BANI:K joaq J 0108 -00030 652.86 t )
0042 4T3537418 BERG =201 JOSEP" A 0108.00031 509.62 t )
7 OD -42 472121660 BOHL ' JOHN C 010 5 -00032 52105 t )
0042 469684867 801 U44 N RICK A 0108 -00033 691.33 t )
1332 463461930 CLAU301! DALE K 0108.00034 261.99 t 1
101 �________-------- ..____.. _.._____._._... 0042 4764461 19 DREGER RICHARD -' C'0108 -00035 899.80 t ) _...___. __. __- •- .- _- _._____..�___ __
33!42 4 73267881E GRtoEI NOR MAN L 0108.00036 720.78 t I
�► 0042 46f568516 H4LW:G KEVIN R 010 8 -00037 657.89
7042 473614916 H_R3_RT( MI..H4EL J 0108 -00038 155.01 t )
n : 4 1 , 31.42 412222231 KORTUS DONALD V 0108 518019 t ) f
�, 0042 4715$3591 LANG RICHARD J 0108�fl0040 610.74 t 1
30.42 - . _ . - 476431 388 .LEE ... .__._ ._..__ -.... .. ROGER _ ......_ - W 0108 -
00 0 41 - 7 3 4.71 t - ) VOTD "REPLACED ' Ck #010800207 - _ _.._.._w
t, 33,42 463191347 MC VJLN JOHN J 0108 -00042 0000 t x
If3l 0042 474607636 MEE1401*'JR Jk4ES E 0108 -00043 721098 t ) I
� 3342 459442163 HOES' HTER RICHARD -' M 0108 00044 284.01
00.42 475340990 MORELLI R4rMOND J 0108 -00045 804.48 t )
z` 0042 463452884 PELTI ER WILLIAM F 0108.00046 718092 t )
xl 30.42 471564831 - RYAl MICHlkEL P 3108.90047 713.07
® 2� 0042 4T OS 2 345 T SKALMA N DONALD Y 0108 -03 0 48 190.94 t )
24 3342 473548226 STAFIIE GREGORY L 010800049 749.91 t 1
0 J.t► 2 4 t 1 t 212 J 4 � ._ ..- S T EP �' r N .....�. _.. ...... -SCOTT ' _ ........ L.. 010 8 -00 0 50 � ..__ ..- -- 3 O S • 62
115 a
�1b 0042 471533251 STILL vorw RNON T 0108 -00051 731.35 t 1
33142 471629234 STOCKT)1 D�3IELL T 0138 -00052 695.49 t )
Z� `.. D 3I► 2 _...____.. 4 T 16 3 2 3 52 __ - T H OM A L L Al _... ___ . .____ DAVID
0 0042 475363333 WILLt DUANE J 0108.00054 559.83 t )
30 30.42 414263133 ZAPO4. JOSEPH A 3108.00055 783071 t )
1
0042 59645.37 +� '
U j
3s
00.4'S 4t554843 ECKE'R R04AtD - -- - 0 - 0108.00056 4530 02 . _ ...-
( 35 3.343 4694411`89 GI AF DAVID M 3108 -00057 644.75 t )
V :g 3043 46PS23466 HEINC STEPHEN J 0108 -00058 819.06 t ) !
!zr 0043 39276.0309 KARTS FLINT D 0108 -ao059 183.84 t )
3u 30.43 473567791 MELAIDER JON A 0108 .00060 71.03 t )
31.43 463351918 NELSON C440L M 0108- 03061 931.58 t ) f
40 i -. 00443 471 534316 RAZSKA6OF. _ DALE ___........ E 010 - 00062 741,79
00.43 474486311 VORW: R* ROB:RT E 0108 -D0063 326.47 t )
0043 461502201 YOUNSREN J4MES G 0108.00064 684.01 t 1
{ �44 »� 3 4,855o55 •
�a J
1 46 33.45 4714113T Mg R - TSDN JA"ES M 0108.00065 749.81
30.45 47224.2212T S�H43T ALFAE3 C 3108 -00066 879.50
0045 .. _ .. .. , . _ - 1 9 629.31 • _ _ _ .. _._ ...__._- --- .._._...__..._...... .._..._... _ .. .._
y,( 3046 465431899 CAMAVES AITMONY G 0108.0006? 162.07 t )
.
0046 477627236 FLAUGN:R JArNE L 0108 -00065 472.34 t )
�t i
00.46 376739373 M40E_L RAfROND M 3108 -03069 478.99 t )
too
r t{
•
CITY of NA
. t
3 =PT•NO
j
CHECK DATE 0
01w11.85 PERIOD E
0046
EMmLa -43 E
3D.46
_
33A 6
CHECK•NO A
33A6
CLEARED
473507030 M
I
J.351
M 0
0051
475.61 t
t )
)
472365919' N
NEL.S31 K
0052
A 3
3352
464.64 t
3152
•
0052
RA811E J
JANET L
L 0
0052
. �
7352
-i
4 7 773 3 32 2 S
'r a�
0052
A 0
0052
444.24 t
i
0052
Z ?�
• (2��
: ►,�
00.53
�?
3353
L 3
D0.5 3
34 i
t )
�±
0053
i,
KENNET" G
:.,
33,53
39.22
0054
Via.,;
534483174 W
W_GW:RT" J
0054
A D
DIOSM00076 3
,3.
t )
)
00-58
0058
3E.
005
��a11
0058
,.,;
0058
CASS W
WILLIAM C
C 0
01.08.00D77 6
0!V-
0059
s�' ...._.... :...
'
3059
1 f
R04AL0 L
2 AYR0LL•CN CKa tc C
CYCL:- 8
8325 C
CHECK DATE 0
01w11.85 PERIOD E
ENDING 01.0485 PAGE 3
EMmLa -43 E
EMPLO 4AME C
CHECK•NO A
AMOUNT C
CLEARED
473507030 M
MARTIN S
SMAWN M
M 0
0108 -00071) 4
475.61 t
t )
)
472365919' N
NEL.S31 K
KAREN A
A 3
3108.00071 4
464.64 t
t )
)
468600133 R
RA811E J
JANET L
L 0
0108 -33M 4
478.52 t
t I
I
4 7 773 3 32 2 S
STANVKE .
.JULIE A
A 0
0108.00073 4
444.24 t
t
2.976.41 •
471443267 B
BART& M
MARIE L
L 3
3108 - 00074 2
252.33 t
t )
)
4 T35668T 2 H
HA IDER K
KENNET" G
G 0
0108m00075 3
39.22
534483174 W
W_GW:RT" J
JUDITH. A
A D
DIOSM00076 3
37007 t
t )
)
661.92
496338314 C
CASS W
WILLIAM C
C 0
01.08.00D77 6
681.89 t
t 1
1
471526254 F
FZES RC' R
R04AL0 L
L 3
313800078 -
- --- 351075
531544137 H
H =L =Y R
RONALD J
J 0
0108.00079 6
618.13 t
t
471531241 K
KANE M
MICNAEL. R
R 0
0108 -00080 5
535.67 t
t )
)
466363473 K
KLAUSING H
HENRY F
F 0
0108.00081 6
605.28 t
t ' )
)
415601431 L
LJTZ D
DAVID P
P D
D108 -03082 5
582.38 t
t )
)
4?1533547 N
NEVER G
GERALD Y
Y 0
0108 5
575.85 t
t )
)
41PS914533 O
OSWALO V
VICK O
O 0
0108.00084 O
O.(it) _
_ . .
.)
4 681 6675 5 P
PRETrN:R J
JOSEPH a
a 0
0108 -00085 1
19074.27 t
t
472241464 R
REIN =RIL E
EDWARD A
A 0
0108 -00086 7
762.89 t
t )
)
470346224 T
TEVLIN•JR H
HARRY J
J 0
0108.00087 7
783.81
475519777 Z
ZAPP4i J
JAMES M
M 0
0108 -00088 0
0003 t
t X )
)
6.571
472683970 A
ANL•JR. R
RAY C
C D
D108m00089 8
832087. t
t )
)
472491010 E
ELIAS J
JAMES 6
6 0
0108 -00090 6
689.87
0
CITY OF MAPhLEV000 PAYROLL•CHECKS 1EGISTER CYCLE 6326 CHECK DATE 01.11m85 PERIOD ENDING 01.04.85 PAGE 4
DE E4PfLoNO EMPLOrEE MANE CNECK•NO AMOUNT CLEARED
1
• I, DaAl 477331366 BREIIER" LOTS J 3108.00104 100.64 t )
3161 458341993 KRUM4EL BARBARA. A 0108 -00105 161o82
1) D31 4T32SO319 ODES14RO R08ERT 0 0108 -Q0106 1 t f
s 31.61 468582618 STAPLES PAULI41 E 0108 -00107 65504 t )
00.61 1 X928.65
0062 469821909 _ BEE8s _ __ JOAN J - 01 . 08 - 03108 _ 202087
3362 i1i9�8762 6RE41ER JAY A 3138.04109 0000 t X )
�12 0062 47144tZ19 BURKE MYLES R 0108.00110 64.18 t
, � _..._.._ _ _. _..T.._._ _. _ . ............
'0062 47150331? CA RLS OW TI MOTRY D 0108.00111 222.Q1 t )
14, 33,52 47461$152 GER41.1 * DAVID A 01091 00112 516.38 t f
►,� 0362 472303411 GUSTNOA. MELVIN J 010 8.00113 876.55 t )
2544121 NELE _. ROLA NO 8 01 -. - 645.27
►, 90.62 4635 84 ?9? HOPKI NSF THOMA C 013 8 -00 115 O.OD t X. f
1u 00'S2 4677445!3 HOSCyK1� JAMES E 0108•-00116 0000 t K )
b,
30.62 473969784 HUNTER TONY 0108 -00117 96.94
30.62 4?1 ?4 831 3 LIBM4 RDT THOMAS 0 D108 -00118 D.OQ t K )
DO.S2 473503715 LINDOROr= DENNTS P 0108 -00119 574.73 t )
22 _ ,362 . 473555506 MARUMP MARK
23 OD.62 444444444 REAL T03D Y 0108.00121 0003 t x f
z° ._ _ - - __ __ 3.3.62 ..._. �.� 474018128 RASCWE ._ ALBERT F 0108 -00122 0.00
_
251 1.152 4?►S46S62 swnuIST' . THIO14AS J 0108.00123 0000
0052 473660035 STAR( R Ic"A - RD E 0108m00124, 115.96 t 1
0062 475934189 TDWN:.EY MIC "AEL F 0108 -00125 0000 t x )
ld
'33.62 4 l ? ! 81 931 _. _ T 0 WN L _ IF—— __ _ � _ -- PATRICK.. _.__._.. _ J - 01 D $- D 012 6 ._ _._._. '00-00 ( ... X I - -
+�l0 3062 415?45266 WARD TRDr G 0108.OD127 0.00 t X )
30 3062 398164197 YUKEI WALTER A 0108 -00128 53.08 t f
'
31
OD.62 3
:
�344 . 0 053 119 84242 A 1l L rat a .R.p._.._...,._._._.._. AA 0108 - 00129 __...... .._... D.00 _...___.. � _.r...._....
33,53 4709401 T5 ANDEIS34 CORTSTINE M 0108 -00130 0.00 t x )
; I IA3 4?51? 3190 BARTH JODY M DI 0 8 -oOD 131 01800 t x f
333 3 47111.85265 BEA -4 N _ VAN NE L 0108 - 00 132 . 0.00 t X
00.63 466 989? 77 BE SE TH RONALD L 01 D S -00133 0.00 t K )
3� 0063 27049379? BLACK WILLIAM J 0108.00134 0000 t X )
.... 3 _.. _ . _. _ . 4 6 9 8 4 �. b3 4 .. _. ..- ____ _.._ _ _ .. ...__.. _ . _... .__..._._._.� __
40
BOEV:R..=.. -._ -- ..._. - -_.- R03ERT .) 010600135 27.62 ( )
W .y, 37.63 4T23S2115 BORASy DONNA F 0108 -00136 0000 t x 1
33.63 473962448 BRYAMT ROBERT 0 0 00137 0.00 t X )
4 00.63 ... 474442474 8UYK?_ RICKARD H 0108 00138 _ 69075 ( ) ..__.._.._., __... - .___.__ _.... �_.._. ._._._....,._...._._..�.,w.._..
•144 00,63 415924615 CASS =DAW ELLZABETM J 0108 - 00139 0000 ( x 1
� 0063 i 73684976 CASSEDA MARY K 0108.00140 _ 0000 _._ ( X
1 . _- .____._._.w__.___---- ._._____ .__..- » 30.63 - 4129151.69 COLLINS STEVEN A 0108.00141 O.OD ( _ X )
�'..� 00.53 469441336 OE 44RS S44DRA L 0108 -03142 0.00 t X f
33.63 4748 ?9219 DIESE . JERRY 0 3108 - 00143 0.00 t x )
� OOS3 414401 92 DINDERMAN JANI NE M 0108.00144. 0.00 ( X )
��... 0053 476121245 DOUG +Tr LINDA R 0108 -03145 0000 t K f
E
00.63 476911538 DRAKE BARBARA, J 0108 -00146 0000 t K f
0063' 467948845 F A LT _ t SSE K JAMES . __... E 010 8w00.1 47 .... 113 .41
0063 472921337 FISCAER' SUSAN M 0108.00148 152.00 t 1
•ass. .
w nx
N7
CITY OF MAPd.EW00D
MAYROLL- CHUCKS 4ENSTER
CYCLE
8326
CHECK DATE
01.11 -85 PERIOD
ENDING 0144.85 PACE 5
DE
E4PL•N0
E 4AMr..
CNECK-NO
AMOUNT
CLEARED
33S3
473025557
FOWLER
M4Rr
K
0108.00149
0000
(
x
)
f,r
33.63
42198$735
GALBRAITH
CHRIS
3108.00150
0000
(
x
)
00A3
469933628
GRAF
MICHAEL
0108 -OD151
0001
(
x
1
I
33A3
502825654
H4 R4
3 =AOR4
M
3108 -001S2
0000
t
X
)
30.63
4 ?5S26T12
HARPEI
JAMES
0108 -03153
0000
(
X
)
-
33,63
47484?R11
NETMERL
CAROL
0108•CO154
0.00
(
x
)
30.63
476656116
MERSER
KARIN
J
0108 -00155
0.00
(
x
)
.�
30.63
4739D8T85
IIOLLIVGSW)RT4
LISA
0138 -39156
0.00
t
x
f
)
0063
4T372513T
H UNT
JACK
0108 -00157
0000
t
X.
)
33.63
4F9891140
JOHN30t
JOS =PIM
A
0108.00158
0000
t
X
f
33.63
461336130
JOMVSO!W
TERE'SA
L
0108 - 03159
O.OD
t
x
) ,
13
33A3
469862399
KANE
KAIEN
01.08 -00160
0000
t
x
)
00,63
470680548
KIEL3 A
KARI
J
9108 -09161
0003
t
X
)
1
33.63
4TSIF45753
KLASa V
SJ3Aw
0108.01162
0 .00
t
X
,
) -
0063
4t 4T 4391 S
KORTUS
JADES
M
.
010800163
0.00
u
X
0063
46848461.5
KRUNgEL
8' "KV
J
3108.00164 -
0000
t
x
)
'
00.53
472494219
LE C:AtR
MARY
L
0108 -00165
0000
t
x
)
33A3
W683448
LOEF=LER
CAIOL
J
0108.00166
0000
t
x
+..i
03,63
470259324
MAC DOVAL3
ELAINE
E
0108.00167
0000
t
x
)
30A3
426923136
MAGI..L
JOSEP14
M
0108.00168
109.96
t
)
33,63
473TJOF29
- MAH4E
MIC!lELE
A
0108 -00169
0000
t
x
) -
�.,
33.63
470926903
M SSIN
KATHLEEN
M
0108.00170
O.OJ
t
X
a
00.63
474956150
MIHELICFO
CIP401
L
01.08 -00171
0.00
t
x
)
��
x.Jl
33.63
45956331.7
NISK4r
JANET
A
0108 -00172
0.00
t
x
)
°�.��
D3,63
4 ?4T4S123
NOESEN
CRISTIN
A
0108- 00173
0000
t
x
)
,
ODA 3
4 73 565127
OLSOV
ROBERTA
J
01
0000
t
x
1
ODb3
4728011158
P+ADGETIt
MARCTE
D
0108••00175
0.00
t
X
)
31,63
4$19481 D5
P E A RSOV
LESLIE
A
01 08-M100176
0
t
x
)
00b3
472941928
PELTI ER
MICHAEL
R
0108 -00177
0000
t
X
)
:31
�
00.63
- 465827763
RA34
MICHAEL
F
0108.00178
0600
(
X
,.;
03.63
469930639
ROBE2
P%JL
.1
0108 -03179
0.03
t
x
)
33,63
248213342
SETTLES
GERALD
0108.00180
DOW
t
x
)
00.63
_ 480161518
SHELOOM _. _
LEO �_
8
0108 -00181
"- ` 5908
_.. (
) _..__...____.__....._.._...._._. �� _._...�_..�__._.._._.�..._.._.. `.
30.53
396634119
STNNIGER
SARAH
J
0108 -00182
0000
(
x
)
0063
47796906E
S'AVIBAPUEZ
DAMN
M
0108.09 183
0
[
X
I
30.63
4699453!'0
SMAN13 VUER
EVA
C
3108.00184
0.00
t
X
)
{
00.63
461742545
SPAVHBA -UE2
KRTHLEEII
0
0108.00165
0003
t
X
)
33A3 3
00.63
4 74 84 51 ?6
469965435
SPA4434VER
SPANNRVUER _
MAI T IN
SUSAN -
J
_ L
0108 -00186
0108 -001ST
O.00
0.00
t
- _ _. T
x
_.x
)
)
30.63
4 779231 TO
STRA US
LAURA.
J
0108 -00188
0000
t
X
)
33.63
416961/66
SJLLI VII
JJLIr
31 08 -03189
0.03
t
X
)
00.63
4?1923921
StURr�K
JOANN
M
0108.00190
0000
t
x
)
00S3
471626422
TAU94A1t
DOUGLAS
J
0108.00191
610042
t
)
3 16 3
473963233
W4LLIEE
JON
T
3108.00192
0.07
(
x
)
3033
395324246
WARD
R OY
G
0108 - 00193
289.82
t
30.63
4 77743911
WE 8Eq
RICHARD
J
0108.40194
1 86.00
t
)
00.63
4746066/0
ZAHN
WILLIAM
A
3108 -00195
0000
t
X
)
,
0063
1. 618.36 +
OQS 4
1 51 440508
GREW
JANET
M
0108.00196
556.44
(
. - ...... _.. ._. _....__.... _. -
33.64
471384624
H3R3IELL
JJJITH
A
3108.0019?
261.15
(
)
;
:n��
1
h I rs w
CITY )F MAPR.EWOOD PA- YROLL•CH_CKS AEGISrEA CYCLE 8026 CHECK DATE 01.11.85 PERIOD ENDING 01.04.85 PAGE 6
DEPT• NO E 4''L -V) E M PL)r aE f 4iNE CMECK- NO AMOUNT CLEARED
- .� -.__.. ,.. T 0108 -00194 3 t
!Z 33b4 474562163 SOur�: R Cd4 INE
3 3.64 1 9 12 3.21 • ,
a Dori 38 ?445913 CNLE3ECK iuDr M 0108.00199 367.77
33 4r553?455 MISK __:. NANCY J 0108 -00200 0.00 t x
* � OO.ri 470540551 OLSON GEOFFREY w 0108.00201 840.14 1 1
2 ,
C
S �,z 3.].72 4 ?76Z T1 r8 EKSTt 1 V) T40HAS G ]10 8.00 202 564.12 t
'-" 0.072 475635505 JOHNSON RANDALL L. 0108.00203 534.14 t 1
0 0 r 2 _ ... _ . _.. - -- - -_ .. _ _ 19098030
�,t
OO,T 3 476)2)6?? OSTI)M MARJORIE .0108 =00204 829.75 t I
- �.,,.,
03.73 829.75
0014 466139223 6IR4R0 L48RENCE 0108 -00205 0000 t x )
),.T4._. 38 ROBERT Y;Y6ER _ .._ ... _ .. - ROaRT -_ r 7 S 00206 ...�....`_.. 3T .4 5
1'0 9
X 24 33.74 579.45 • _ --
fi�� 0042 476401388 LEE ROGER W 0108 00207 705.93
COJ NT 00 206
0042 468181347 MC NULTY JOHN J 0108 -00208 3978.52
_GRAND TOTAL --- •-- - -...._ . _ _ .._... ._ _ _. -_.__ ____ ._ -._... __ _ ._.. __.....__..__._ _....__.._...89 493. .
S
131
1 .1 31 1
94
�S
.37
4
c
•
1
�
l ose
db
c
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: City Engineer
SUBJECT: Roseville Water Main Extension
DATE: January 21, 1985
Attached is a letter from Burger King Corporation requesting a water
main extension from the Roseville water system. Maplewood cannot
serve the subject property now, or in the future.
It is recommended the city council adopt the attached resolution
requesting Roseville to service the subject property with water.
mb
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Burger King Corporation desires to build on Rice
Street, south of County Road "B ";
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood cannot provide water service to the site;
WHEREAS, the City of Roseville has water service available on Rice
Street;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA CITY
COUNCIL, that the City of Roseville is requested to provide water service
to the proposed Burger King Corporation site.
'BURGER KING CORPORATION MINNEAPOLIS REGION
January 15, 1985
Mr. Ken Haider
City of Maplewood
1902 E. ODunty Ik)ad "B"
Maplewood , NAT 55109
RE: PROPOSED BURGER KING RESTAURANT
RICE STREET AT COUNTY ROAD B
MAP LEW OOD , MINNESOTA
Dear Mr. Haiderz
As we have discussed, the Burger King Corporation is pre -
sently pursuing the purchase of a restaurant site at the
referenced Cub Foods store. As you will see, the site
is located at the very westerly edge of Maplewood. It
is located in proximity to both Little Canada and Rose-
ville. The City of Maplewood., as you have discussed with
me, does not have water mains in this area. It is nec-
essary therefore, that Burger King extend water for our
building in either Little Canada or the City of Roseville.
Of these two options, extending water under Rice Street
to the Roseville water system seems to be the more viable
of the two options, By this letter, therefore, I am re-
questing that the City of Maplewood' s City Council request
from the City of Roseville, that 'we be allowed to extend
water from Roseville ' s water system
By the conditions stipulated in our Real Estate contract,
we must purchase this property by the end of February. It
is necessary therefore, that a request . be put on the next
agenda for the Maplewood City Council, that being held on
January 28, 19 85 . If this request is then passed on to
Roseville, Roseville could then act on the request at their
council meeting to be held on February 11, 1985, I have
worked with the city of Maplewood in the past, and I am
sure that I can look forward to your cooperation in this
matter.
I have included a preliminary layout of the Cub Food site
for your information. Our surveyor is presently preparing
a survey of the proposed site and we will begin final site
grading and utility plans as soon as we receive that survey
from him,/ I will forward. these plans to you as soon as
possible .
10901 RED CIRCLE DRIVE, SUITE 205, MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55343 TELEPHONE: (612) 933 -7773
Mr. Ken Haider
January 15, 1985
Page 2
If you can f orsee any particular problems or there are any
questions I can answer, feel free to contact mev once
again, I thank you for all your help and cooperation.
Sincerely,
BUP R I RPORATION
obe A. Hoida, Architect
ite Development Engineer
RAH /m lh
cc: Bill Ranek
Jim Nunn
John Gannon
/�_ _47
r_
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
OWNERS:
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
City Manager
Associate.Planner-- Johnson
Street Vacation, Zone Change (R -1 to R -3) and
Variance (Lot Frontage)
Walter S treet and Frost Avenue
Michial Mularoni
Frank Silberbauer and Edith Hag stro
January 17 1985
r?
SUMMARY
Request ( See plan on page 9
1. Vacation of Walter Street, 254.92 feet south of Frost Avenue .
2. A rezoning from R -1, residence district (single dwelling) to R -3,
residence district (multiple dwelling) .
30 A lot frontage variance of 42 feet for the Hagstrom property at
1096 Frost Avenue. Code requires at least sixty feet of lot frontage.
The Hagstrom property would have only 18.08 feet on Walter Street.
Proposal
1. Site and building plans will be developed if the rezoning and
street vacation are approved. (See the applicant's letters of request
on pages 10 - 13.) -
2. The east half of Walter Street would go to 1096 and 1100 Frost
Avenue. Mr. Mularoni intends to purchase this land to add to his
site.
Comments
The confusion and conflicts with this property are a result of a land
Ian designation for multiple dwellings and a rezoning for single
use
P various times in the
dwellings. Motions have been made at v past to P
change the plan or the zoning so they are both consistent. Each
motion failed for lack of four votes.
A decision on Walter Street should be made before action is taken on
the rezoning* Staff had previously assumed that Walter Street would
not be built. An R -3 rezoning was recommended because it was
consistent with the plan. and would be a more efficient use of the land
than two single dwellings fronting on Frost Avenue. Recently,
however, council considered constructing Walter Street to reduce
traffic is on Phalen Place. Action was tabled to see if the upgrading of
Frost Avenue will resolve the Phalen Place traffic problems. If
council eventually decides to build Walte Street, there would no
longer. be a need to allow multiple dwellings, * since the property could
be developed with three single dwellings fronting on Walter Street.
If Walter Street is not built, council should consider a compromise to
resolve the current deadlock -- approve an R -3 rezoning, vacate Walter
L
Street and amend the land use plan to RL , residential low density,
This would allow Mr. Mularoni to make more efficient use of his land
by constructing multiple dwellings, but. the density would be reduced
to that of the surrounding land. This would require a change in the
RL definition as well.
Recommendation
Table the rezoning, street vacation and lot frontage variance until
Frost Avenue is upgraded and traffic counts can determine whether
Walter Street is needed to reduce the traffic on Phalen Place.
BACKGROUND
Site Description
1. Proposed rezone site: size.- -1.21 acres; existing land use- -
undeveloped land and undeveloped 60 x 251 -foot portion of Walter
Street right-of-way,-planned for res.idential medium density use.
.2. Proposed street vacation: an undeveloped 60 x 254.92 foot - portion
of Walter Street, south of Frost Avenue.
34 Proposed lot width variance site: size--160 feet of frontage on
unimproved Walter Street and 120 feet of depth.
Surround ing Land Uses
Rezone site_:
North: Frost Avenue. Across Frost Avenue, Flicek Park
East: two single dwellings
South:'
outh : ' single dwelling and an unimproved portion or Walter
Street right-of-way
West: two single dwellings
Lot frontage variance site (1096 Frost Avenue) :
North: single dwelling
East: unimproved alley right -of -way. A gravel and grass drive
way -
access i s maintained from Frost Avenue over an alley ley r fight-
. Y
of -way to this dwelling. Across the alley are single dwellings
with garages that are accessed from Frost Avenue or Phalen Place.
South: single dwelling
West: unimproved Walter Street right -of -way that is part of the
area being requested for rezoning.
Past Actions
5 -1 -80:
Council approved the construction of Walter Street. The applicant's
property was proposed for minimum -sized single- dwelling lots all
fronting on Walter Street.
Construction of Walter Street did not proceed because of a
disagreement with Mr. S i lberbauer (1078 Frost Avenue) as to
assessments and required easements.
If a project does 'not proceed within one year, it must be reordered by
council. No requests were received and the project was dropped.
3
8- 23 -82:
1. A council motion . to approve an R -1 ( single dwelling) to R -3
(multiple dwelling) zone change by the applicant for that site failed,
with only three votes rather than the required four votes in favor.
The reasons for the two opposing votes are not stated in the minutes.
2. Council vacated Fenton Street west of 1078 Frost Avenue to Adele
Street
.3. No action was taken on a request to vacate Walter Street.
9- 27. -82:
A council motion to rescind the 8 -23 -82 zone change denial failed. with
three votes in favor.
11 -8 -82 :
Council approved a land use plan amendment from RM, residential medium
density to RL, residential low density for a number of properties
lying east and west of the applicant's site (lots four to ten, block
four, Kavanagh and Dawson' s Addition to Gladstone ( page 16) . The
applicant's site was left designated for RM use.
2- 24 -83:
Council's 8 -23 -82 denial of the applicant's zone change request was
upheld in District Court. The judge's memorandum concerning. this
decision is enclosed on page 14.
1 -9 -84:
A council motion to the land. use plan for this site from RM,
residential medium density to RL, residential lower density failed for
lack of four votes in favor .
Planning
1. Land use designation: RM, residential medium density
2. The RM, residential medium density classification is designated
for such housing types as single dwellings on small lots, double
dwellings, town houses and mobile homes.
3. Permitted density: 22 people /net acre
4. Proposed density: not to-exceed that permitted. The actual
density will be determined once the zone change is approved.
5. Present zoning: R -1, residence district '(single dwelling)*
6. Compliance with land use laws:
a. State law:
1) The .following findings must be made before a variance
can be granted.:
4
a) Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship
because of circumstances unique to the individual
property under consideration. "Undue hardship" as used
in connection with the granting of a variance means the
property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use
if used under conditions allowed by the official
controls, the plight of the landowner is due to
circumstances unique to his property not created by the
landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not- alter
the essential character of the locality. Economic
considerations alone shall not constitute an undue
hardship if reasonable use. for the property exists
under the terms of the ordinance.
b) The variance would be in keeping with the spirit
and intent of the ordinance.
b. City ordinance:
1) Section 36 -485 of city code requires four findings for
approval of a zone change:
a) The proposed change is consistent with the spirit,
purpose and intent of the zoning code and the land use
plan .
b) The proposed change will not substantially injure
or detract from the use of neighboring property or from
the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of
the property adjacent to the area included in the
proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded*
c) The proposed change will serve the best interests
and conveniences of the community, where applicable and
the public welfare.
d) The proposed change would. have no negative effect
upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension
of public services and facilities, such as public
water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
2) Section 30 -8 (f) (1) (b) requires single - dwelling lots
to have not less than 60 feet of width at the front lot
line.
7. 1096 Frost Avenue has 160 feet of frontage on the Walter Street
right -of -way. The north portion of this property could be split off
for a single* dwelling lot, if the alley were to be vacated and if
Walter Street were to be improved.
8. The legal frontage for 1078 Frost Avenue is Frost Avenue. The
sale of the Mularoni . property eliminates this frontage. 1078 Frost
Avenue does have a drive over the undeveloped Walter Street to Fenton
Avenue.
V
Public Works
1. Walter Street is not necessary for access or traffic circulation
in this area.
2. Walter Street would require a public subsidy, because three of
the abutting properties are corner lots, with frontage on Frost or
Fenton Avenues. Also A fourth lot., 1078 Frost Avenue is accessed.by a
- driveway from Fenton Avenue. This means that the owners of these four
parcels cannot be assessed the total cost of constructing Walter
Street . P ast their property. The short fall would have to be paid out
of public funds.
3. Sanitary sewer is located along the center line of Walter Street
between Fenton and Frost Avenues. An easement should be retained ten
feet either side of the center line.
4. Water is not in the street. An easement should be retained east
of the sanitary sewer easement to the permit private installation of
water if.ever desired.
5. A storm sewer is planned east of the sanitary sewer from Frost
Avenue South, approximately 120 feet.
Public Safe
The existing driveway to 1096 Frost Avenue does not pose any
significant access problems for emergency vehicles.
Citizen Comments
Eighteen owners of property within 350 feet of the site to be rezoned
were surveyed. Eight ° persons responded. Seven are opposed to
multiple dwellings in this single - dwelling area. The property owner
at 1096 Frost Avenue had no' opinion until she sees what is to be
developed. The owners opposed are 1742 Frank Street, 1068 Frost
Avenue, 1101 Fenton Street, 1890 Adele Street, 1,907 and 1893 Phalen
Place and 1865 Walter Street.
3c
Attachments:
1. Location map
2. Property. line /zoning map
3e Site plan map
4. Applicant's letter (vacation)
54 Applicant's letter (rezoning)
6. District court memorandum
7. 11 -8 -82 plan amendment map
6
4
F
F R
I
R c
r t
R i
r�
j
.yes:
mall
� � 1
� tt
ot
R CoLWT v IIO�D
. J i f •
R f • h R PUD
Q .J 4F
al
� " f F
M i R
A
8C l
• F Ml �+ 3
Mi Mf M1 ox
Tftdw
f M,
of
1
M MOE
F 1 y C OUNTY L J R
.R ♦.. - � � ;w arp
F ' P (R ?J o ma
LOCATION MAP
Attachment One
.WWI
M * %S
o ss
d r
lip
it
tA^16EO To VILLA PUK W
i
i
w 100
068
r
J .... .
1 • t
` I S
• ' C, S
Sol. .2t ly
1096 '
� �. • .�,,
105
0
Z
t 10 78 iiof 2G
ON +e o n
000- r"
MEOW
D p co .1.e-
.�
UJ r
1 `•
or0 ' t • tG
o z
--
'` 11
y °'N� !
4�,
�.
mom
-A p Al
• - 0 �t 1
di
1
w 1 i4
f~• ---
.! .?
0 .
r: • �,
'1► T ♦ ' ♦ , n tin ._ ,� 2
UL '
1 14
NE IN,
40 IAA
;A Z
RI PLEY
10 q 1 PAR K
Sir)
Nt
1 � .� � , � • (O 1 O , r � ; i T i ter.
v + ZC OP
)1b 0 �Q 3 4 1 4, •
r --
PROPERTY LINE./.ZONING MAP
Area requested for rezoning (R -1 to R -3)
. Attachment Two
Q
N
8
KELLER GOLF COURSE
Frost Avenu•
1!
2 1 0.0 10'120' 20'
m
m
m
<I
i
�o
m
0
Q
c
1068
u
1050 X07$
o ,
N
VM
Undeveloped I
150.0
in co
t Existing _ --
o R Fenton R.O.W.
1082
Undeveloped
I
41 1
1 Lr--
Cox c X6
E
X b
w `C
I�1
30"' o
10' 10'
1.100
c�
v
a
c - -
3
o x
0
to
r -- —
1 1098
0
0
120.0
1101
120.0
0
0
N
r
Fenton Avenue
i
C%
0
cc
3
. north
'i"'� "�•
MAPLEWOOD9 ' c. .. afCM�. M
MINNESOTA *s �'E PLAN Au
.r....aw • .w..a. *Sol wdwwonp a*&
1 �» •�r�w M go t
-9- 8 -21 -84
Attachment Three
(Applicant's Request)
michial mularoni associates, inc.
August 21, 1984
Mr. Geof f 01 son
Director of Community Development
City of Maplewood
1902 East County Road 8
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Re: Partial Vacation of Walter Street
Dear Mr. Olson and Staff,
The purpose of this street vacation is to .provide for an alternative to
installing Walter Street between Frost and Fenton. I have been advised
of the unusual high cost of the construction of street, curb and gutter
and water, by the city engineering staff,
In June of 1982, the City staff informed me of the necessity of finding
solutions to two non - conforming uses in the affected area if a street va-
cation were to be granted. One non - conforming use is the parcel owned
by Edith Hagstrom at 1096 Frost Avenue. She informed me. that she was
discussing the p o s s i b i l i t y of providing an easement to her property from
Fenton with city staff as a solution to her access problem, thus paving
the way to allowing the Walter Street vacation to take place. Also, city
staff and I discussed the second non - conforming use solution, which is
at 1078. Frost Avenue and owned by Frank and Patricia Si Iberbauer. If
Fenton Avenue were to be vacated, Mr. S i I berb a uer would gain 30 feet of
the Fenton north R. 0. W . ; he would also gain 30 feet of the Walter west
R.O.W, upon its vacation, . thus having a total of 60 feet of frontage on
existing public streets. This is a permissable front width for cul -de -sac
lots in the City of Maplewood. Mr. and Mrs. Si Iberbauer were under the
impression that Fenton is already vacated. ;
As a result of my 1982 application to vacate Fenton _ and Walter Streets,
only Fenton was vacated from Adele up to the rear of the Si Iberbauer
parcel . No action was taken on the Walter vacation. At this time, so
as to accommodate my needs and not to solve the "neighborhood" inconsis-
tencies in roadway rights of way, I would like to request the vacation
of Walter Street commencing at Frost Avenue for a distance of 254.92 feet,
This partial vacat ion of Walter would be consistent with previous actions
taken. It would also be consistent with City Engineering assessments of
the unbu i I dab i l i t y' of the street,
V
Attachment Four
721 14th avenue soot h_,_( 0 4 10 ) 823Ang I rnn. 55
10
August 21, 1984
Mr. Geoff Olson
Page 2
Enclosed with this letter is a map of the area in question. Also indica-
ted on the drawing are desired easements needed by the City for both
existing sanitary sewer in. the center of the Walter R.O.W. and an addi-
tional 10 foot easement for a distance of 200 feet off Frost Avenue for
future Storm sewer.
If you have any questions or require a d d i t i o n a l information, please con-
tact me.
Si ncere I y,
ichial Mul roni
Property Owner
3
11
AK`
michial mularoni associates, inc.
August 21, 1984
Mr. Geoff Olson
Director of Community Development
City of Maplewood
1902 East County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
'Re: The re- zoning of the Frost Avenue /Walter Avenue parcel.
Dear Mr. Olson And Staff:
The above referenced parcel i s located a t the intersection of the unim-
proved Walter Avenue and Frost Avenue. It is currently proposed medium
density residential in the Maplewood Comprehensive P l a n . I t is intended
to develop this site not to exceed 22 net persons per acre. . This 1.23
acre site will support a population of 27.1 persons as per City Code. No
specific buildings are being proposed at the time. Future building shall
obviously be consistent with current zoning and b u i l d i n g codes with no
special exceptions or variances. Upon successful rezoning of this parcel,
market conditions and financing w i l l dictate the building types.
This type of development provides for transition planning from low densi-
ty r e s i d e n t i a l to medium density res i dent i al to the non-residential across
the collector street, Frost Avenue. From a "neighbor" perspective, the
255 foot deep lot fronts on Frost Avenue. This Will provide for at least
100 feet of distance `between the single family, home for sale to the south
and any future construction, There will also be at least that. same
amount of distance to the .east and west neighboring structures. This re-
zoning is consistent with Maplewood Comprehensive Plan. When the com-
prehensive p l a n was changed in the area in 1982, this parcel was upheld
as a Multiple Dwelling Residential District consistent with R -3 Zoning,
It is the applicant's intention to rezone this parcel to its intended use
via the comprehensive p l a n and as provided in. the 1976 Land P 1 ann i ng
Act. (Minn. Stat. 473.865, subd. 3).
The excellent vegetative cover to the east and the west v i s u a l l y separate
any new construction from existing single family homes. Sewer and water
are in the Frost Avenue R.O.W. Necessary water service is i n s t a l l e d to
the property line. Sewer connections in the unimproved Walter Avenue
are also a v a i l a b l e , to this site. The existing 60 foot R.O.W. for Walter
Avenue will provide for needed stormwater sewer easements in the future.
The future proposed construct ion will have an excellent view of Keller
Golf Course and City park across the street*
Attachment Five-
721 14th .avenue sout 612) 8 —919 mn. 55407.._
12
August 21, 1984
Mr. Geoff Olson
Page 2
If you have any questions or require additional information, feel free to
contact me at anytime.
Respectfully submitted,
M chial Mular ni
Property Owner
13
ri P1 o R A :1 D U 1
This case presented a number of navel and unusual isSueJ
to the Court. In researching the prablein the Court was im_pressed
by the decision of the :iinneso -a Supreme Court in the case of
Honn v. City of Coon R 313 N.W.?d 409 (December 17, 1 °31. )
In analyzing the problem, it appears that there is some
question as to whether or not summary judgment is the proper way
to proceed in determining the issue before the Court. A reading
of the Hdnn case would suggest that before the Court rules t:ii h
respect - to the decision -of the city council, there should be an
ample record establishing the reasons for the council's
determination . Based on the depositions of the two council
members and the brief and memorandum of counsel for the City of
Maplewood, it would appear that an ample record does exi:3t to
uphold the determination of the city council.
At the sar.1e time, the Court cannot refrain from
commenting -that it would appear that petitioner has presented a
rather compelling set of circumstances that would indicate
reasons why his petition for rezoning should be granted.
However, in weighing whether or not it was solely th? wishes of
the neighbors or whether there were other factors involved, the
Court must look at the entire record.
Certainly, as far as the law is concerned, rezoning
matters must consider the promotion of the public health, safety,
morals, and g eneral welfare. 11hile no evidence appears in the
record to indicate any problem of public health, safety, or
morals, it can be argued that the general welfare of the
Attachment Six
1a
K
R community may not be served by the rezoning.
It further appears from the comments of counsel for the
City of Maplewood that if certain measures are taken by the
petitioner, there is reason to believe that a favorable result
.might be accomplished.
Under all of the circumstances as noted by the Court, it
appears that the decision to deny the writ of mandur1us is a
proper one at this time.
Another interesting aspect of this case is the contention
on the part of th4 petitioner that the comprehensive plan should
be considered as more than a guideline and that, in effect,, it
proscribed a duty on the part of the city council to grant
rezoning in these instances where the rezoning would be in
conformity to the. comprehensive - plan . No law was called to the
Court's attention with respect to this question and the Court was
unable to determine, based on the contents of the file before it,
as to whether this question should be answered in a - manner
favorable to the plaintiff'-petitioner.
t i
f
S tz , J.
15
Y
r_
P. L
ISO
• �.•t%/► S Et7 TO VILLA
6L www�. -mm SUN "M am low
. �� ` .. •. .. � Air � t!
- n'
fel
Ao� lip
lei
'' F ! V sll
ao
NAO 10
tA
All
0 Is.
0 qr
A LAr
.T. 0
UL(
A P/
R I P LEY
Is 0A
cc,
O A-
. �- T ON
Ir
ro
_ .
' 3 F,2
a t : 9 ♦ �� 1 •
_ L 7 ••_
_
1 c�.0
aD e+G
t
19 t / 2•
GC 1
3 c J r s
1 3 4•.; i � - 4? ♦�, f--- -j --
• t SO - 1 l Z
Lamm 7-
0-1, r y A z _ ' S
.5a ex-
0 ♦ M 4 �, - 1 1 J
• 3 n
_ a
_ _
1'► r T ��� ..
.� ~ CMS. _♦
l r
• - ` i / v- ` ,� ` •.rte. ' 7
s
T r �+
qr
PROPERTY LINE MAP
Applicant's lots 11-g8 Pjan.Amendment
PP from'RM to RL whicfi exempted the applicant's.site
16 Attachment Se ven
4
N
3. It would be in the public interest to plan for the conversion of the
office building property to single -dwelling .property.
4.. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical,
.efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities. such
as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
5. The proposed zoning would not be overly restrictive for the office
building site, because it can be divided into two single - dwelling lots very
similar in size to several nearby lots.
6. The neighborhood commercial zone is not recommended, because it would
allow a substantial nonresidential expansion of the use of this site.
Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl.-
Fischer, Larson, Pel l ish. Si gmund*i k, Sl etten, Whitcomb
D. vacation, zone change and variance-Walter and Frost
Secretary Olson said the proposal-is to vacate a portion of-Walter-Street,
zone change from R -1 to R -3 and a lot frontage variances
The commission questioned if staff was f a m i l i a r with the points that were
presented by both sides to the judge in this issue
Secretar y Olson said he was not at the hearing, but said there are two council
people in the audience who testified that could give some information.
The commission questioned if it was part of state law to zone property to
comply with the comprehensive plan.
Secretary Olson said it is not part of state law, the city council initiated
the down zonings about one and one half years ago. The land use planning
act requires- a zone change within nine months of a l and use p-1 an amendment.
Rezonings are required to be consistent with the plan.
The commission questioned what the planning law would have to say with relation
to the site involved.
Secretary Olson said the comprehensive plan has not changed, it has been
RM, any rezoning would have to be consistent - wi - th the plan.
Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment on the
proposal. - -
Norm Anderson, 1603 Frost Avenue, said he has been before the commission-
before and has stated that when there is an R -1 district. R -.2 and R -3
should not be put in. The applicant would be using half of Walter Street
to construct the development on. This would be an infringement on the
people who have lived there for some time. There is- another problem that
has developed recently with Phalen Place. Citizens from that street have
complained about added. traffic. He thought Walter Street should be some-
how constructed. He wished the commission to consider the added density
into the R -1 district.
9
10 -15 -s 4
Mike Mu 1 aron i . 4721 14th Avenue South, Minneapolis, is the applicant, said
the only point he would,like to reiterate is the fact that this particular
land use has been challenged in terms of the comprehensive plan. At the
same time i t has been upheld by the p1 anni ng commission and city council
This has already been re- examined. He is asking that the planning commission
respect his efforts and the efforts of the staff and _city council in their
last voting and the commission's last voting that did uphold this density.
As far as the rezoning, the analysis of the site is that it is a different
character and nature than the typical higher use zoning in a residential
area. It is good land planning to recommend approval of the zone change.
In terms of the immediate neighbors, they feel the same way and do back
him in what he is doing. He requested that the commission recommend approval
to the city council.
Fran Juker,1965 Barclay, said she was on the council when the original proposal
was made. She thought this is a - bi t different. This proposal shows Walter
Street being constructed back to 1096 Frost Avenue. She voted against the
proposal for many different reasons, the city was taken *to court on their
decision. One of the reasons they voted no was because 1096. is large
enough to spl it into two lots, Without Walter . Street being constructed
all of the way through it could not be done. They are presently using the
alley exit to get to the property. The property would be landlocked i f
Walter would not be constructed. The people at the corner would give an
easement to the existing owners (1096) but not to a new owner. The proposal
for the vacation of Walter 1 andl ocks property and makes 'lot unbui 1 dabl e.
Mr. Mularoni said he does agree that this proposal is different than the
previous one. The previous proposal was resol -ving deadends and variances
and parcels needing access. The acting chairman of the commission, at that
time, was commending the work that was done to tie all of the problems up.
He said the city defense in this case was the objection of an individual
that was objecting to the whole issue of Walter Street and it was the fee
owner of 1101 Fenton. who resides in cal ifor -nia. After discussion with the
.city attorney, his attorney and staff-the whole effort is to think about
his parcel, which he wishes to move on with. This is why only part of the
street is being asked to . be vacated. This ignores the rest of the . probl ems
of -the neighborhood which are not related to him. Both engineering and
.staff attest to the fact that the bui l dabi 1 i ty of . Wal ter is unfeasible.
The, right of way is needed for easements in the future. He has no intention
of building on the - right —of —way. The whole issue of the vacant lot,
staff has made reference in terms of feasibility of constructing Walter
relative to that one lot, the owner has not and does not have a problem
or desire to split the lot at this time. The question of dividing the lot
is reflected in -the staff -report.----He does not want to review the old
questions with the new proposal. They are trying to keep the proposal
simplified.
The commission questioned if during previous review, if there was some
negotiation with Mrs. Hagstromfor access to the other lot.
Secretary Olson said yes, it was to provide a driveway from 1096 down to
Fenton. After the council hearing the owners decided it was not what they
wanted.
10 -15 -84
10
The commission asked for the reasons for the denial of the recommendation
for a - plan amendment to RL at the 1 -9 -84 council meeting
Mr. Mularoni said some comments were made during the public hearing, he
said he would be asking city. council to rezone this property to be consistent'
with the comprehensive plan. There was an attitude adopted at this point,
and the counci 1 initiated a land use change to undermine the fact that there
was consistency. Also the believe that the property should not be designated
RM i n the land use plan. The council made a motion .to ask the planning
commission to consider an amendment to the plan. It was the opinion of
the P l anni ng commission, on _that motion, to redesignate everything around
except his parcel because the planning commission felt he was justified
i n this request. The commission voted i n favor of the proposal once and
it would be contradictory to not support the amendment.
Secretary Olson said the action discussed by Mr. Mularoni was the 1982
action. The action in January, 1984, after the court decision that upheld
city action, a motion was then . made for a land use plan amendment to RL
in an effort to match the zoning. The motion did fail due to lack of four
votes. - - - -- -- - -
Mr. Mularoni said he was not at the meeting and was not aware of the action.
The commission indicated that in view of the present status of the comprehensive
.plan, there is not much alternative on the recommendation of the zoning.
The commission also indicated said it appears that the owners of 1096 and
1100 intend to cooperate with the applicant in the street vacation. These
owners are not present at the meeting to oppose the vacation. Relating to
splitting i tti n of the property at 1096, the applicant is not present at this
P g
meeting to indicate that a division is even wanted. - Therefore, the commission
should not even consider that factor. By agreeing to sell their portion
of vacated Walter they are giving-up their right to divide.
Mr. Mul aron.i indicated that he has obtained signed earnest money agreements
from both of the parties, waiting for the approval of the proposal.
Doris , 4
ris Calhoun 2205 Arkwri ht uestioned if the people surrounding this
property were informed of the - meeti ng.
Cha i rma n
Axdahl said this is not a public hearing, there will be a public
hearing before the city councils
Mrs.* Calhoun commented bn. the satement regarding the owners not being
present - at the meeting to state their - concerns about di priding property.
The Commission *said the people affected by the vacation is the applicant
who i s p resent, the owner of 1100 and 1096. If the staff comments are
correct that the owners intend _to cooperate with the appi cant and sell.
PP
the applicant their parts of vacated Walter;--all pertinent parties have
r r opportunity
been heard from. The affected prope ty owners will have anothe opp y
to comment at the public hearing.
10-- 15-84
11
Mr. Anderson asked when the fee for the earnest money was paid to the owners
of 1096 amd 1100, was it prior to the 1982 hearing.
Mr. Mularoni said it was prior to, it is now a renewal of that agreement.
The owners have indicated they do not wish to have anything constructed
close to their property. There will be 40 foot of utility easement between-
his development and the adjoining property lines.. He has been working with
staff on his proposal. He said they will go' through the process of the
rezoning and if the owners of .1096 and 1100 decide at that time they do
not wish 'to sell the property, they do not have to. . They owners were not
opposed to this in 1982 and they are not now. There was only one person
P
out of all the people notified, that opposed the proposal at the last hearing.
The council was more opposed to the proposal than the neighborhood.
Commissioner Fischer moved the .planning commission recommend the city council
adopt the following . resolutions:
WHEREAS, Mi chi al Mul aroni applied for a variance for the following
described property:
Lots 14 -17, B1 oc k , 3, Kavanagh and Dawson' s Addition to G1 adstone, Section
16, Township 29,.Range 22,Ramsey County.
This property is also known as 1096 Frost Avenue, Maplewood;
WHEREAS, Section 30-8 (f) (1) (b) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances
requires sixty feet of width at the front lot line for interior single — dwelling
lots;
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing 18.08 feet, requiring a variance
of 41.92 feet to vacate a portion of the Walter Street right —of -way.
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood desires to vacate all of the Walter Street
right -of -way abutting this property requiring a lot frontage variance of
s i xty feet;
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance, is as follows:
1. This variance was applied for on October 3, 1984.
2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission
on October 15, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council
that said variance be approved.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION____ that the
above-described variance be approved on the basis of the following f i ndings-
of -fact:
1. The spirit and intent of the zoning code would be met because:
a.. The dwelling is. clearly visible from .Frost Avenue and the driveway
entrance is clearly identifiable.
10 -15 -84
12
b. The present driveway has been used to access this property without
. public safety - related incident since prii or to Maplewood becoming a city.
c. Year - around emergency vehicle.access to this dwelling can be
achieved with the existing access.
2. The present access, which was established before Maplewood became.
_ a ci ty, does not present an emergency vehicle access problem, therefore
it would be a hardshi p unique to this property to require the otherwise. un-
necessary improvement of Walter to be improved only to provide customary
and usual access to this property.
3. If the variance were to be approved, the essential character of
the locality would' not be altered.
WHEREAS, Mi chi al Mul aroni and the City of Maplewood initiated proceedings
to vacate the public interest in the following - described real property:
Walter Street between Frost and Fenton Avenues, except the south forty
feet in Kavanagh -and Dawson 's Addition, Section 16. township 29., -Range 22
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation-is as follows:
1. This vacation was initiated by Michial Mularoni and the City of
Maplewood on September 11. 1984.
2. This vacation was reviewed by . the planning commission on * October
15, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that
this vacation be approved.
WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above-described street right -of -way, public
interest -i n -the property would accrue to the following-described abutting
properties: --
Lots 2 through 10, block 4 and lots 11 through 20. block 3. Kavanagh
and Dawson's addition to Gladstone, Section 16, Township 29, Range 22
NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
that it is in the public interest of grant the above - described vacation
on the basis of the following findings -of -f act:
1. Construction of this street would be cost -prohi bi ti ve because four
of the five benefiting lots are corner lots and, as such, cannot be assessed
for the full cost of the improvement.
2. There ,i s no public need to retain this right -of -way for street purposes.
Vacation would be in the public interest.
This vacation is subject to the retention of -a utility and drainage
easement over the east forty feet of the entire right =of -way.
WHEREAS. Mi chi al Mul aroni initiated a rezoning from R -1. residence
dsitrict (single dwelling) to R -3, residence district (multiple dwelling)
for the following described property:
13 10- 15--84
Lot four, except the south 22.08 feet thereof and all of lots 5 through
10, block 4. Kavanagh and Dawson' s - Addition to Gladstone and the East 112
of the vacated alley accruing thereto.
The North 254.92 feet of the West 1/2 of the vacated Walter Street accruing
thereto, in block' 4. Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition to Gladstone, Ramsey
County, Minneosta,
The North 254.92 feet of the-East 1/2 of the vacated Walter Street accruing
thereto. -in Block, 8, Kavanagh and Dawson' s Addition to Gladstone, Ramsey
County.- Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1. This rezoning was initiated by Mi chi al Mul aroni , pursuant to Chapter
36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission
October 15, 1984. The planning commission* recommended to the city council
that said rezoning be approved.
..NOW, THEREFORE.-BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following
f i ndi ngs -of -fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent
of the zoning code and the land use plan.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from
the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood.
and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included i n the proposed
change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the.best interests and conveniences
of the community, where applicable and the public welfare*
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economi al extension fo the public services and facilities,
such as public water.- sewers, -- police and fire protection and schools.
Commissioner Pel l i sh seconded Ayes - Commi ss i oners
Fischer. Larson, Pel 1 i sh. Si gmundi k, S1 etten
Nays—Commissioners
Axdahl and Whitcomb
E. Hearing Date --2150 McMenemy Street (Brook's Superette)
Staff is recommending a hearing for November 5. 1984 to change from RL to'
LSC.
Commissioner Pel l i sh moved the planning commission hold a public hearing
on November 5. 1984.
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes—Commissioners
Axdahl,. Tischer, Larson. Pel l i sh, Si gmundi k, S.l etten, Whitcomb
10 -15-84
Ji
MEMORANDUM
To: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Code Amendment -- Storage Space for Multiple Dwellings
APPLICANT: City of Maplewood
DATE:. December 12, 1984
Request
Amendment of the ordinance to permit the required 120 cubic feet of miscellaneous
storage space in the main building or the garage. Presently, code requires it to •
become within the main building.
Comments
The reason for requiring the extra storage space to be in the same building
is convenience. - Since t•hi s storage space is designed for items that are not
used on a regular basis, it seems reasonable to allow this storage in the
garage.
Recommendation
Approval of the ordinance amendment on page 2.
Procedure
1. Review and recommendation by the Community Design Review Board and HRA
2. First reading by the city council
3. Second reading and public hear-ing by the city council
mb
Ordinance Amendment
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE REQUIREMENT
FOR MISCELLANEOUS STORAGE SPACE
FOR MULTIPLE DWELLINGS
The Maplewood City Council hereby ordains as follows:
Section 1. Section 36 -110 is amended as follows (deletions are crossed out
and additions are underlined):
Section 36 -110. Same -- Indoor storage spaces.
A minimum of one hundred twenty (120) cubic feet of m4see44ameeas storage space,
s hall -be- made-a va4Table- ie- eaeh- malt�ple- dwel1}eg- eeRstrueted - }e- the- e4ty -f6F- —
eaEh- dwell *eg- ur�t- w *thip- the -. same - buy; d0ig- sueh dwel14pg- bw4t- �s - }eeated-
Sueh- storage- area - shall -be in addition to the normal closet space, that - }s - }e
the -dwell �Rq -ue4t- shall be made a v a i l a b l e for each multiple -dwel 1 i ng unit,
Such storag space shall be located in the same building as the dwelling unit or
in the ga bu sh all not be considered as part of the habi table area of a
welling unit. If located in the garage, it shall be enclosed and shall not be
part of the automobi l e parking area.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication.
Passed by the Maplewood
City Council on 1985.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Ayes- -
Nays-=
r.
Development--Bee o
C. New Apartment Pent - -Bee Road m
Design n Review Board approval to
Don Palme has recei mmuni 9
e- bedroom apartments (four, -unit
construct si xteen t e Road. The
• n Lar enteur Avenue, west of Beebe
buildings) no P Utilities and
eight upper
u s would unit for $550 /month, plus
• g d rent for $525 /month, plus u t i l i t i e s *
the .eig er units woul
• 'd on a stor area code amendment are
Council st dec ide 9
an begin. (See item 7A,)
constr ct1on c g
6, unfin • ed Business
N e
7. New Business .
A. Code Amendment -- M p M ulti le Dwelling Storage Areas.
seconded to recommend
commissioner Carlson moved and Chairman Fischer -
Comm� ss follows Proposed deletions
are
mend Section 36 -110 as
_ that Council a
ed new language
crossed out, proposed uage is 9
• nt (12 cubic feet of ml5eellaneeu5
mum of one hundred twenty _
A min - {�- eaea-- �dl��ple- dwell�eg
storage s ace, shall-be- jade -ava4 lable
g P •— _ - - - well4n - u114t- wltb}fl -the Safe bd
Eepstruete.d -4A -tae e4ty fer eaEh d g
• - - eeated: -- Sueh- sterage- .area - shall -be In
�A -SdEa- dwell }Ag d��t �5 l -dA�t:
g . closet space, that- 4s -{n- the- dwell
addition to the normal c , l P _ Such
for. each multiple-dwelling l in unit. S
shall be made available he dwellin
ar
l be located in the same bui l din as t
stora e space shat s t of the
• garage, but shat 1 not be cons i dered • a
unit -or �n the ace is . ?art in a
ab a area of a dwelling i n unit. If such s
habit ch on
area an shall not encroa
g arage. it shall
be i n an enclosed ar
the normal automobile parkin area.
Motion carried--3 to 1. Commissioner Schmi t voted against the
e. does not agree' that additional storage space
motion because h otherwise
i red outside of a dwelling unit. He -
should be required i s retained ned by
•
supports the - reco�rmended rev i s on , i f the requirement
supp
Council.
Mort a e Participation Program
Be MHFA knicipal Ho me 9 g
• d and Commissioner Carlson Co�rn� s s i o r Schmi t move n seconded to
bankers
ff to request proposals from area mort
authorize s_a q mortgage money.
h bu i ers for an al 1 ocati on . of tax-exemp •
and h would recommend that the city
If there is en ugh interest, the HRA
I Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for
submit an appl i tion to the M� nnes
• i al Home Mortgage Part�c�pat�on Program,
funds
funding from the uni c p
•requirements were . agreed upon:
The fol l owe t ng progra requ i reme
2
B. Sinclair Sign Height Variance (Rice Street)
8
0
Jack La rence of Signcrafters was present at the meeting. He represents
Sinclair i 1 in their signage. Cub Food obtained sF32 a of the Sinclair
property. t that time there was a sign up that wa feet high which
was located out 5 to 7 feet from the - rear of - Si nc property line,
It was on a hi 1 situated at an elevation of 18 22 feet. They had a
meeting with Cu Foods and staff of the city re and i ng the situation with
the height of th sign. He informed staff th they wi shed to stay at-
the present height. they were at. They took he road grade which would
be 18 to' 22 feet hi h. He was informed t re would be no problem a variance
would not be requi He informed the wner that the sign could be
installed at an el eva ' on height of 53 eet. The applicant read a letter
from the Cub representa i ve which al indicated that the understanding _
was that the 53 foot sig would be ermitted. The sign, as it is installed
at the present. l ocation. at a 1 wer grade than what the street is..
The board indicated that a b oods was denied . a request for a five foot
variance for two signs.
Secretary Ekstra
nd indicate th t the sign was on a hill and at the original
• he a lican he d not give authority to anyone to put up a sign
meeting ng w� th t he pp
oft he height that has b n i nsta ed. He informed - the appl i c -ant that if
the original sign is to en down, th new sign must comply with code or request
a variance. The p
ermi that was app i ed for was for a 35 - foot tall sign. The
• had a h ht of 57.9 fee The city did check the height of the
sign gn erected g .
' instruments. Also, the sign is not meeting the required
sign with su rve i n y g
30 foot setback.
f the code re i rements for the zoning district
The board revs a ed with staff
as to sign hei ht and location.
Board
Membe Juker moved the board recommend enial of the 29 -foot sign
height va
r ance and the - variance to exceed the axi mum allowable height • - -
of 50
f for the Sinclair pyl o.n sign. Denial ' s on the basis that:
1. The r' a nce - would not be in keeping with the sp ' ri t and intent of the
�
code.
2. he excessive sign gn hei g t h situation was created y the l andowner and
�
wa not due to circumstances unique to the property.
Council 1 recentl y denied sign height variances for Cu Foods for two
�- foot tall pylon signs.
Board - -Member- �Rossbach - seconded Ayes --a 1 _
g
C. Cade
Amendment--Stor Space (Multiple Dwellings)
The board discussed the proposed amendment dment regarding storage spaces in
multiple dwellings. '
5
11 -27 -84
_
i 0 , . - 7
0. Code Amendment -- Storage Space (Multiple Dwellings)
Board Member Peterson moved the board recommend approval of the ordinance
amendment for storage space i n multiple dwellings as outlined i n the
report dated November 30, 1984
Board Member Deans seconded Ayes - --all.
'111.0 VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
I, BOARD PRESENTATIONS
VII
IX.. STAFF PRESENTATIONS
X.. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 9:21 p, m.
MEMORANDUM .3
' TO: City Manager
FROM: As sociate Planner -- Johnson
SUBJECT: Code Amendme (Fences)
APPLICANT: City of Maplewood }� ~�
DATE: November 30, 1984
SUMMARY
Request
1. "Revise the code to prohibit structural supports on the
outside of boundary fencing (counci proposal).
2. Combine the essentially duplicate Sections 9 -3 and 36 -20 of
city.code. Section 36 -20 of the zoning code would be rescinded
(staf f proposal) .
3. Expand the code to address the issues of barbed -wire fences
and fence maintenance (staff proposal) .
Reas for the Request
On November 26 1984, council initiated this code amendment in
response to a request from Mr. Larry Benson at 1800 City Heights
Drive. Mr. Benson's neighbor to the north (1808 City Heights
Drive) had constructed a fence with the supports to the outside,
partially enclosing his rear yard. When staff investigated the
complaint, it was realized that the literal language of .the
present code only requires the supports to be on the inside when
a fence "surrounds an entire lot or tract."
Comments
The intent of the last sentence of Section 9 -3 appears to be to
require the structural supports to be on the inside. However,
the first sentence of the section speaks only to fences that
"surround an entire property in the city for the purpose of
enclosing the lot or tract." The proposed revision would clarify
this ambiguity as well as bring the code into conformance with
customary practice. The supports should be on the inside as a
courtesy to abutting property owners.
Expansion of the fence code to deal with the maintenance and
barbed -wire issues is proposed, because these items are not
clearly addressed elsewhere in city code. Occasionally, comp-
laints and questions are received regarding each of these items.
Recommendation (At least four votes in favor are required for
approval.)
Approval of the enclosed ordinance.
mb
Attachm
Ordinance nce
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE REGULATING FENCES
THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 36 -20 is hereby rescinded:
Fences bordering a property in the city for the purpose of
enclosing the lot or tract shall be limited to a maximum
height of six (6) feet for residential uses and ten (10 )
feet for nonresidential uses. Such fences shall be .subject
to determination by the building inspector as to whether the
portion of fence which on the front yard thirty (30) foot
setback area of the site constitutes an impairment to clear
vision for traffic purposes or impairs the view from
neighboring. properties in such a manner as to constitute a
so - called "spite fence." In any case of obstruction to
vision affecting traffic in the public street or from
neighboring properties, the height shall be only such as is
, determined by the building inspector to be acceptable. In
making such determination, the building inspector may
request advice and information from both the city engineer,
the police chief or persons representing these officials,
and-their opinion shall be given in writing to the building
inspector to be retained by him as part of his permanent
record.
Section 2. Section 9 -3 is hereby amended as follows
( language to be deleted is crossed out, the proposed
language follows the language to be deleted) :
h i ri h 4- n f s. i x 9) EQQ:F- _-=i]=�j-ect
..
a - � - -
• • • • • • • • • • • - • s -
ZZI
• • ° • • • • ° �� • ° • • • • • • • 1 • ei t;y
1• • ° • - • • • • •• • • • •• • • • • °
O C i a • • r + • • • • • - • ° • izQn • • •
• • • • • • f f i r • • - - • • • v 1 = _ • w •
A fence that is within four feet of a property line shall be
subject to the following restrictions:
1. Fences shall have a maximum height of six feet for
residential and ten feet for nonres idential uses.
20 A fence in a front yard that is at least 80% opaque must
be approved by the director of community development if it is visible
from an adjacent dwellings The director may approve the fence if it
does not significantly impair views.
3. A fence is subject to Article V, Chapter 29 of the city's Code of
Ordinances (Sight Obstructions at Intersections).
4. The structural supports shall not be on the outside of a fence,
facing the adjacent property.
5. Barbed -wire fencing shall*be prohibited except in a F, farm
residence district, where livestock is being raised.
6. Fences shall be constructed and maintained in a workmanlike
manner.
7. The city council may approve variations to this ordinance after
notifying the adjacent owner (s) at least ten days before a meeting,
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect . upon its passage and
publication.
Passed by the Maplewood City Council
on January 21, 1985.'
Mayor
Attest:
Ayes- -
City Clerk Nays --
P
/ - 7 - � %57
D. Code Amendment -- Fences
The proposal is to revise the code to prohibit structural supports on the outside
e p p �
of boundary fencing and to address the issues of barbed — wtrb - fences and fence
maintenance, plus combine the duplicate sections of the code.
The planning commission recommends the city -council approve the proposed
ordinance amendment
M
t
Request
Amend the swimming pool setback requirements from utility lines. NSP
is requesting that Maplewood' s ordinance changed to match the
requirements of the National Electrical Code and the National
Electrical Safety Code.
Reason for the Chan e
The National Electrical and the National Electrical Safety Code have
established minimum utility line clearances from pools for safety.
These must be followed by . electricians and the utility company, as the
applicant's letter states on page 3 .
• MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Code Amendment- Swirmning.. Pools
APPLICANT: Northern States Power Company (NSP) Y
DATE: November 14, 1984
Maplewood's code, which is more restrictive, should be amended to
conform to these regulations. There is no reason why Maplewood' s
requirements should be more restrictive. This only tends to make pool
placement more difficult for the homeowner and creates confusion as to
what specific pool.clearances should be applied.
Because of periodic electrical code changes, the ordinance should
compliance require with the two electrical codes to avoid future
q P
discrepancies.
Recommendation
Approval of the ordinance on page 5 amending the utility line
clearances from swimming pools to match the requirements of the
National Electrical 'Code' and the National Electripal Safety Code.
3
BACKGROUND
Current Ordinance
Section 31 -5 (2) requires that "pools shall not be located beneath
overhead utility lines, over underground utility lines of any type 'or
within fifteen feet of any such utility lines."
Past Action
10- 21 -71: The swimming pool ordinance was .adopted .
1. Recommendation by the planning commission
2. First reading by the city council
3. Second reading and decision by the city council
jc
Attachments:
10 Applicant's letter dated 8 -10 -84
20* Criteria from . the NSP Co. electric
3. Ordinance amendment
2
P45P Northern States Power Company
Lakeland Division
1700 East County Road E
White Bear Lake, Minnesota 55110
Telephone (612) 770 -1347
August 10, 1984
Mr Tom Ekstrand
Associate Planner
City of Maplewood.
1902 E County Road B
Maplewood MN 55109
Dear Sir:
The City of Maplewood has a swimming pool ordinance that
has been in effect for a number of years. This ordinance
was developed before the National Electrical Code or the
National Electric Safety Code current rules went into effect*
At the present time the. rules in the National Electric Code
(which electricians must follow) and the National Electric
Safety Code (which utilities must follow) have the same
standards* 'These standards have been set to insure that no
person while in or near the pool or cleaning the pool, can
come in contact with utility wires. The rules specify dis-
tances from water level., edge of water surface, diving plat -
form and diving tower.
We request that the wording in 31 -5(2) be changed to:
Utility lines must be located in such a manner
to conform to the National Electrical Code and
National Electrical Safety Code.
Please remove the words:
Pools shall not be located beneath the overhead
utility lines nor over the underground utility
lines of any type or within fifteen (15) feet
of any such utility lines.
16EPH our uly,
A LADNER, PE
Distribution Engineering Manager
Lakeland Division
JAL / r 3 attachment one
B
B '
/ A A
A
POOL CLEARANCES .
Over Pools •
Service drop conductors shall not extend over (1) pools, (2) diving structures,
(3) observation stands, towers or platforms, or the area extending 10 feet
horizontally from the inside of the walls of the pool.
EXCEPTION: Structures listed in (1), (2) and (3) above shall be permitted
under utility- owned. - operated and - maintained supply lines or service
drops where such installations provide the following clearance:
Triplex Conductors Open Wire Conductors
Voltage to Ground Voltage to Ground
0 - 750 Volts 0-15 kV 15 -50 IN
A. Clearance in any direction to 18 ft. 25 ft. Z7 ft.
the water level, edge of water
surface, base of diving plat-
form or permanently-anchored
raft
B. Clearance in any direction to 14 ft. 16 ft. 18 ft.
the diving platform or tower
Wherever practical, the installation should provide for greater clearances than given
_ above. Proper clearances over other obstructions not mentioned above may be
ascertained by inquiry of the Company, (Also, see drawing, Page 45, for ground
clearance to residential premises.)
Underground Wiring Location
Underground Wiring shall not be permitted under the pool or under the area extending
5 feet horizontally from the inside wall of the pool.
• The term "pool" as used in this section shall include swimming, Trading, and perma-
nently installed therapeutic pools.
23
From the Northern States Power Company's Electric Service Information handbook
4 attachment two
D. Code Amendment Swimming Pools
Secretary Olson said the proposal is to amend the swimming pool setback
_
.requirements from utility lines. Northern States Power is requesting
Ma lewood's ordinance be changed to match the requirements of the
that p t
National Electrical Code and the National Electrical Saf e y Code.
Commissioner Sletten moved the planning commission recommend the city
council 1 ado p t the ordinance amending the utility l i n e clearances from
pools to match the requirements of the National Electrical Code
swimmi n g p
and the National Electrical Safety Code.
Commissioner S i g mundi k seconded Ayes --- Commissioners
Barrett, Fischer, Larson, Pel l i sh, Robens, Si gmundi k, Sl etten
r p .
8
y -5
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: CITY CLERK
REGARDING: APPLICATION FOR ON -SALE CLUB LIQUOR LICENSE
NORTH MAPLEWOOD LIONS
DATE: JANUARY 21, 1985
t Y
V C
The North Maplewood Lions Organization, 1310 Frost Avenue, has applied for an On S a l e
Intoxicating Club Liquor License. (This license is the same as held by the Loyal Order
of Moose, Lodge 963) . The P u b l i c Safety Department is in the process of investigating
the applicants.
It is recommended the license be approved subject to receiving favorable reports.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
"PlICATION FOR IlVTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE
THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN DUPLICATE.
Whoever shall knowingly and wilfully falsify the answers to the following questionnaire shall be
as ^^^e`a •iI +3- ^-f pc• �sry and shall be punished accordingly.
In answering the following questions "APPLICANTS" shall be governed as follows: For a Cor-
poration one .officer shall. execute this application for all officers, directors and stockholders. For a part-
nership one of the "APPLICANTS" shall execute this application for all members of the partnership.
EVERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED
officer for and behalf of
1, _Jose uh J Moos — as North Maplewood .tons: T nc
(Individual owner, officer -or partner)
for and in behalf of Club, Inc
hereby apply for an _ on Sale Intoxicating Liquor License to be located at 11 0 Frn
Avenue, Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota 55109 legally describ a�
Lots 1, 2 3, 4, 5 & 7, Block 3 Gladstone, Ramsey C ounty
Minnesota together with vacated street ad in the City of
(Give address and legal description)
Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No.
95 of Maplewood.
2. Give applicants' date of birth:
1 1, - 26 November 1924
(Day) (Month) (Fear)
V
8. The residence for each of the applicants named herein for the past five years is as follows:
1711 Clarence, Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 -
4. Is the applicant a citizen of the United States?
Yes
If naturalized state date and place of naturalizatio
If a corporation or partnership, state citizenship including naturalization of each officer or partner.
i
Al 1 the above of f i r- Prs f or North Maplewoo _L ions and North
Ma lewood Lioness are citizens of the United States
See attached Exhibit A
b. The person who executes this application shall give wife's or husband's full name and address.
Barbara J.Moos 1711
6. �At occupations have applicant. a rr4 *"W*ft ♦ps in this Ft "licet;nn fot)n��•ad ^• A�•p 6 �,0 •• ^�r�'
Office Manager, Shaw Lumber
7. If partnership, state name and address of each partner
North Maplewood Lions, Inc. 11/29/65
If a corporation, date of incorporatio r Maplewood Lioness . lnr
which incorpora Minnesota - amount. of authorized capitalization
amount of paid in capi
If a subsidiary of any other corporation, so sta
Purpose of this corporation as
give purpose of corporatio non - profit, set forth in attached Exhibit B
name arA address of all officers, directors and stockholders and the number of shares held by each:
(Name) (Address) (City)
See Attached Exhibit A
If incorporated under the laws of another state, is corporation authorized to do business in this
St N/A • Number of certificate of authority _ N I ZA
_ If this application is for a new Corporation, include a certified copy of Articles of Incorporation and
By -Laws.
8. On what floor is the establishment located, or to be located ? 1 s t f 1 oo r
9. If operating under a zoning ordinance, how is the location of the building classified?
Business, c omme r c i a 1 , Is the building located within the prescribed area for such license?
Yes
10. Is the establishment located near an academy, college, university, church, grade or high school?
N _°___. State the approximate distance of the establishment from such school or churc N A
11. State name and address of owner of building N orth Maplewood Lions, Inc . an r1.. Nnrt
Ma plewood Lioness Club, Inc . has owner of building any connection, directly or in-
directly, with applicant? Yes
12. Are the taxes on the above property delinquent? No.
13. State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, have ever had an application
for a Liquor license rejected by any municipality or State authority; if so, give date and details
No
Has the applica..w o r ..;.y ol"Lls associates in this application, uu irle, .,. :e � •�►�.. o un,tlCUlB�c��'
preceding this application, ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked for
any violation of such laws or local ordinances; if so, give date and detail N: ._
.. 7"•:' te: ,�,•OT�_.•�y+tgy ^.�o.!.m....,�; .. w .. e . • ..�.�.,.. .�v;.iF` , ^r�' Cv- ?R'i1'�' - �nCe�,S7,� t 7 1F . vgpy�
t
lb. State whether applicant, or ary of his associates in this application, during that past five. years
were ever convicted of any Liquor ;yaw violations or any crime in this state, or any other state, or
under Federal Laws, and if so, give date and detail No
16. Is applicant, or any of his associates in this application, a member of the governing body of the
municipality in which this license is to be issued? _._DIo . If so, in what capacity?
17. State whether any person other than applicants has any right, title or interest in the furniture,
fixtures, or equipment in the premises for which license is applied, and if so, give names and details
No
18. Have applicants any interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly, in any other liquor establishment
in the State of Minnesota? . Give name and address of such establishmen
19. Furnish the names and addresses of at least three business references, including one bank refer-
enc Eastern Heights Banks, W ilson Ave St Pa»1 MN - 5r5 - 9 -
Hillcrest State Bank
Norwest Bank, 55 East 5th Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
20. Do you possess a retail dealer's identification card issued by the Liquor Control Commissioner
which will expire December 31st of this year? Give number of sam No
21. Dues applicant intend to sell intoxicating liquor to other than the consumer? No
22. State whether applicant intends to possess, operate or permit the possession or operation of, on
the licensed premises or in any room adjoining the licensed premises, any slot machine, dice, gam -
Yes in compliance with
bling device and apparatus, or permit any gambling therei Cit y of maps ewond nrc h n a nces
and State law
23. Are the premises now occupied, or to be occupied, by the applicant entirely separate and exclusive
from any other business establishment? Yes
24 . State trade name to be us ed -marth Manl wood L & L Ball
Ir. State name of person t�a4 . ! sto::__ Maplewood L & L . Hall
26, Give Federal Retail IAquor Dealer's Tax tamp Number
,0
27. If off aAle license is being applied for, do you intend to deliver liquor by vehicle? N A If so,
state number of motor vehicle permits issued by Liquor - Control Commissioner for current year
28. If you Pre building a new building for the purposes for which tads application is being made, please
submit plans and specifications with this application.
29. Financing of the construction of this building will be as follows:
N/A
$0. Furnish a personal financial statement w'fi th this application. If a partnership, furnish financial state-
relent of each partner. Attached �
31. Give description of type of operation if this is an on -sale license application (i.e. whether cock -
tail lounge, nite club, restaurant, etc., specifying capacity by number of customers and any other
• tavern club and display on -sale, ca acit of 350 people
pertinent data) P Y
32. What previous experience have you had in the operation of the type of business described in the
answer to No. 31 above North Maplewoo L & L Board is in charge of
operation and maintenance of the L & L Hall, has experience with
regard to operation as display licensed establishment.
33. .Applicant, and his associates in this application, will strictly comply with all .the laws of the State
of Minnesota governing the taxation and the sale of intoxicating liquor; rules and regulations
promulgated by the Liquor Control Commissioner; and all ordinances of the municipality; and
I hereby certify that I have read the foregoing questions and that the answers to said questions
are true of my own knowledge.
ature of Applica )
Subscribed and sworn to before me this ,
.._ day
•j mS APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMrANlED WITH YOOR CHECK
FOR THE FIRST LICENSE PERIOD.
r
REPORT ON APPLICANT OR APPLICANTS BY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Thm is to certify that the appiicant, or his associates namea nerein nave noz Deen convicteu witn
in the past five years for any violation of Laws of the State of Minnesota, or Mtil�icipzl Qrdivances
r fisting to intoxicating Liquor, exk ept as hereinafter stated. ,
i
MAPLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT
Approved by:
Title.
REPORT ON PREMISES BY FIRE DEPARTMENT
This is to certify that the premises herein described have been inspected and that all Laws of the
State of Minnesota and Municipal Ordinances relating to Fire Protection have been complied with.
MAPLEWOOD FIRE DEPARTMENT
Approved by,:
Title.
o NORTH MAPLEWOOD LIONS & LIONELLS
HALL
1310 Frost Avenue at English
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Telephone: 771 -9830
1984- FOR NORTH MAPLEWOOD LIONS CLUB
1
Clarence F. Haider
294 Roma
Roseville, Mn. 55113
6 -17 -24
Pres.
Francis Da.n. Fratto
1626 Sherwood
.
St. Paul, Mn. 55106
10 -12 -48
1st Vice Pres.
Eugene E. Haugen
2850 N. McKnight
Maplewood, Mn. 55109
11 -19 -
2nd Vice Pres.
Joseph A. Z appa
2 522 Flandrau
Maplewood, Mn. 55109
3 -31 -30
3rd Vice Pres,
Joseph J l loos
1711 Clarence St.
Maplewood, Mn 55109
11 -26 -24
Treasurer
Marvin Allen Bjostad
1823 Onacrest Cv.
Maplewood, DIn. 5.5117
1 -30 -29
Secretary
Douglas Ronsberg
1764 Frank
Maplewood, Mn. 55109 4 - 29 -
Tail Twister
Fred Joseph Barilla
1034 Prosperity
11 -20 -22
St. Paul, Mn..
Lion -Tamer
1984 -1985 OFFICERS . FOR NORTH . MAPLEWOOD
LIONESS
Eileen Theresa Zuercher 1949 Arcade St. 1
Maplewood, Mn. 5509 8 - 8 - 31 President
Doris Jeanette Bjostad 1209 Lark
Maplewood, Mn. 5509 3 -3 - 1st Vice Pres.
Lois Dorothy Rogers 1363 E . Hoyt Ave.
St. Paul, rin. 55 8 -10=21 Secretary
Loretta Jane Haider
Loretta B. Bailey
294 Roma
Roseville, Mn. 55113
2731 N. Ox�'ord
Roseville,'Mn. 55113
5 -20 -23 Treasurer
7 -29 -24 Sgt. at!. Arms
r
NORTH MAPLEWOOD LIONS & LIONELB
HALL
1310 Frost Avenue at English
.Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Telephone: 771 -9830
1984 -1985 OFFICERS FOR NORTH MAPLEWOOD LIONS CLUB
Clarence F. Haider 294 Roma
Roseville, Mn. 55113
6 -17 -24
Pres
Francis Dan Fratto 1626 Sherwood
St. Paul, Mn. 55106
10 -12 -48
1st Vice Pres .
Eugene E. Haugen 2850 N. McKnight
Maplewood, Mn. 55109
11 -19 -36
2nd Vice Pres .
Joseph A. Zappa 2522 Flandrau
Maplewood, Mn. 55109
3 -31 -30
3rd Vice Pres.
Joseph J. Moos 1711 Clarence St.
Maplewood, Mn. 55109
11 -26 -24
Treasurer
Marvin Allen Bjostad 1823 Onacrest Cv.
Maplewood, Mn. 55117
1 -30 -29
Secretary
Douglas Ronsberg 1764 Frank
Maplewood, Mn. 55109
4 -29 -55
Tail- Twister
Fred Joseph Barilla 1034 Prosperity
11 -20 -22
St. Paul, Mn. 55106
Zion- Tamer
1984 -1985 OFFICERS FOR NORTH MAPLEWOOD
LIONESS
Eileen Theresa Zuercher 1949 Arcade St.
Maplewood, Mn. 55109
8 -8 -31
President
Doris Jeanette Bjostad 1209 Lark
Maplewood, Mn. 55109
Lois Dorothy Rogers
Loretta Jane Haider
Loretta Be Bailey
1363 E. Hoyt Ave.
St. Paul, Mn. 55106
294 Roma
Roseville, Mn. 55113
2731 N. Oxford
Roseville, Mn. 55113
3 -3 -35 1st Vice Pres.
8 -10 -21 Secretary
5 -20 -23 Treasurer
7 -29 -24 Sgt. at/,Arms
A
t1A • t1�� t7.. Min�rr�
tom rM Af� at ltWVW* M Mai ra"WOU M
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF
110R1H MAPLMOOD LIONS, INC.
' for the rpoee of farm a corporation under and pursuant � the p
Wt, the undersigned, pu
M{atans ht Chrp�e� .117 Mlnats�Ma. Mtatuter, knci�►n as 'he 11Rt :Hasa �� Artic�k++ of
heretly amwiste mir•ely" toget.het ss w holy c•nrp)rstP adop
Ineor pot stion:
ARTVIX I.
The Horne Of thiw corporation shall be North Maplewood Lions, Inc.
ARTICLE If.
The purpose of this corpora �p be. in order to promote the gelQal
welfare of the community, civic, social, educational and
recreational, the objects of this corporation shall be: To
encourage and foster -- (a).high ethical standards in business
a professions; rofessions; (b) the ideal of service as the basis of all
P
worthy
enterprise; (c) the active interest *of every..Lion in the._._
and
ercial social and moral welfare._of_h_i c vnnmun ityt
-.-
civic, cane► ,
(d) the development of a broad acquaintanceship an an o port
for service as well as an aid to success.
ARTICLE III.
ie ration shalt not afford pecuniary pin. incidentally a otharRias� � i�bQn'
Th Corporation .
ARTICLE IV.
existence o! this corporation shall be: Perpetual.. ,
The period of duration of corporate � .
( wits beim) _
ARTICLE V.
• in this state is. _ -2 6� 2
The location of the registered office of this corporation
Hear Avenue, Saint Paul, Minnesota - - - - - - - -
ARTICLE VI.
toe of this ooR:o�atioa is:. Roltert L, Hal
Ths nartw and address of each inoorpora wren
aint Paul, M�RnesoteJ .� �uercher,. e
1775 Duluth Avenue, -S J.
Saint Paul, Minnesota; _ Perry /Shortridge, 1785 Frank,
1949 Arcade, _
Chas. Fe ,
De 1970 Price _ gtreet, _
Saint Paul, Minnesota;__ -
Saint
Paul Minnesota;_ Dale H. Reed, _2014 Radats Avenue Saint
,
Paul, Minnesotat and jrving.J
derson, 1990- ltadata _ Avenue,
Saint Paul Minnesotas_ and Allen A. Metcalf, 1867 Aurora, ..Saint - _
�
Paul, Minnesota.
.�
�4
•i
263
ARTICLE VII .
The number of clirrctors rnnstitutmt
the Rest hoard of directors of this corporation shall be
ix (6) and the
tenure in office of such first board of directors $hail be one years, or
elected and qualified. The name and address of each such first director is:
unt euccesaors are
c,h rt• 1775 `Duluth Avenue', Saint Paul, Minnesota
R e
Clarence
Ca Zuercher, 1949 Arcade Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota
J.
I'crr •' Shor tr i ��yL', 1785 Frank,, .Saint Paul, Minnesota
Y
Chas. F. Minnesota
D�rc3�ski, 1970 Price Street, Saint Paul,
R ,
ced 2014 Radatz Aver)iie, Saint. Paul,, Minnesota
I��le ii.
I rving
J. L. Anderson, 1990 Radatz Avenue, Saint Paul, Minnesota
ARTICLE VIII.
The extent of persnn
al lishilitY., if any, of member for corporate ohliPti"s and the method" et
en r c rt-ement anal coll Are As follows:
no personal liability.
ARTICLE IX.
Thin corporation $hall have no capital stock. (A) See note m
The capital stock which this corporation shall have authority to issue is:
none. -.
(B)
F names this Y7�Yday of July In Testimony Whereof, WO have hereunto subscnhed our .
A. n. 19 .
with
f�
.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
County of RAMSEY _
On this I �rk doly of — July.. A n 1q 65
perw)nally appeared he'f+irr me Robert L. tla 1 1 - .
Clarence
41kaza Zuercher _ Perry /Shorts idge ,
Chas. F.
6tbttZkaa nerdosk i Dale II . Reed ,
anti Allen A. Mc t cal f
an Irving J. L. Anderson me known to he the prrtMnx drwrihed
in and who executed the foregoing Articles; of Incorporation of -
North Maplewood Lions, Inc.
and they acknowledged that they executed the acme am their free act and deed, for the uses and
purpn•eA therein expreaeed. �, : •)
4 1'�It� KIY
ot&ry PuhliK Ramsey L� County, Minn.
My Commim ion Expires
NOTARIAL SEAL July 2 41 96 8 _
i , ru ._r' m 1111•
,t
` r dii1v InOrds in #J " ' IDA FILE.
A"
�f I!t , err )rdtt�Jns, on , ire _ ._.........
tine �. , „!i .� . ,, v- - ✓-eta -�. Of t. CMf KLO. :s.
1
Notes: Articles IV — Duration may be H"died er pet toat a> d co is e WIN brOm wl certidcais of
inrorporatinn in iwnwd by the secretary of date.
Article IX —Strike out either (A) or (B) and it ampot+atias has aepital Bloc![ set ant tlet an. le awnber
d shares and the per value, if any, of each share.
Filing Fr* $10.00 and in arl Uon Owwo4o, nvait $2.50 b com fee fur r11WI dtat wits+ R+e0der Of Duds. NO
Pawk -atinn is "emend.
Do not attach supp a enta. H this tors dos not contain wif c t yaca, a 160 typrwr trarreript will
. br rMwirvd.
r
P
'
to
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
y FROM• . Associate Plannner -- Johnson A _
SUBJECT: Street Easement Vacation
LOCATION: South of 1858 DeSoto Street
APPLICANT: Thomas Coil
OWNER: Lauraine and Donald Torgerson
DATE: November 28, 1984 Re` ectcd____
Date
SUMMARY
ReSluest
Vacate a street easement
Proposal
The applicant wants to split his property into two lots, as shown
on page 6.
Comments
There is no reason to retain this street easement. Council
rejected the possibility of constructing a street along it when
the Twin Oaks preliminary plat was approved for the property to
the northeast. (See past actions.) The Twin Oaks development is
now under construction.
Recommendation
Approval of the enclosed resolution (page 11) , vacating all of
the street easement lying south of 1858 DeSoto Street on the
basis that:
14, The possibility of a street along this alignment was
rejected as part of the approval of the Twin Oaks Addition plat.
29 With Twin Oaks plat under construction, a street can no
_- longer be cost - effectively constructed along this alignment.
39 The existence of the street easement unnecessarily restricts
development of the properties to the north and south.
Easement Description
BACKGROUND
Size: a thirty -foot wide x 217 -foot long street easement (page
6)
Existing land use: undeveloped
Surrounding Land Uses
North: Two single - dwelling properties - -the applicant's lot
with 164.6 feet of frontage on DeSoto Street-and an undeveloped
single dwelling lot recently platted as part of the Twin Oaks
Addition. The applicant's dwelling is located 78 feet north of
the easement. The lot in the Twin Oaks plat fronts on Burr
Street, which is under construction.
East: undeveloped land
West: DeSoto Street
South: An 85 -foot wide single dwelling property and undeveloped
land. The single dwelling is 18.5 feet from this easement.
Past Action
4- 23 -84: Council approved the Twin Oaks Addition preliminary
plat. Council was presented with three alternatives for acces-
sing the property to the south (pages 7 to 9) . Council rejected
the alternatives B and C which would have made use of the subject
street easement.
9- 10 -84: Council approved the Twin Oaks Addition preliminary
plat. - The development is under construction.
Planning
1. Land Use Plan designation: RL, residential low density
2. Zoning: F, farm residence
3. Compliance with land use laws: Section 412.851 of State
Statutes allows a city to vacate any interest in property, when
the. council makes a finding that "it appears to be in the public
interest to-do so."
4. Compliance with land use laws:
a. Section 30-8(2) prohibits half width streets. This
means that the thirty -foot . easement would have to be widened
to sixty feet if a street. were to be constructed. The
dwelling to the south is too close to permit widening to the
south.
b. Section 30-8(f)(2)
to be 100 feet wide at
feet were taken from t'
for a .street, it would
small to be split. If
lot to the south would
requires single dwelling corner lots
the building setback l i n e . If thirty
he applicant's property or reserved
be reduced to 134.6 feet wide - -too
the street were to be improved, the
be a legal nonconforming corner lot,
with 85 feet of width.
c. Section 30 -8 (f)(1) and 36 -69 require interior single-
dwelling lots to be at least 75 feet wide at the setback
line.
d. Section 36 -70 requires a dwelling to beset back at
least th i rty " f eet from a r fight -of -way: The dwelling to the
south is only 18.5 feet from this easement and would be a
legal nonconforming structure if the street were improved.
Public Works
There are no utilities located within the street easement.
1. Planning commission recommendation
2. council decision following a public hearing
mb
Attachments
1. Location map
2. Property line /zoning map
3. Site plan
4 -6. Area street alignment alternatives
7. Petition
8. Resolution
1►
.
%J
O
.k
Llll�,
J
OF LIMLE "NADA
C/ rr OF ST. PAUL
R f
t L..�
R u •
J
Y •
F ` M
•
dC
P
R
MI
I
F
i
M 1
(R 2)
R E
LOCATION MAP
4 Attachment One
Q
N
i 7
IM
14 4sm
ELJM
64 . ; 3 7 rp 75 76 75 175 ITS
j
AVIA - -�
. • .
AMM
ps
ALIN
R3
— o o 0 "',f' ►,2
• . (Z - Oaks Addition � � � ��� � Z - � 4 3 . e
c �
Tw n .- Z-) X �j4) s> C3•
o: tP1 at - a►..• a
o
5 E� �woofl �A v E,
Sac.
2 r - 30 c a • r.4s� o (41) C 1
AW
18.58:
Ire
2
4 -t8
�S?
b 3 Z!T -
1848
o f (-too)
- undeveloped
a 1838 — - i 9 L /obe loe
1830
-176C 04
�-
•
i822
_ s4
�0
090
s _ 20) ,
.TT K • 0 6� W,/ o� .. i • O o Zfl `g
• � �� • . � s �9 _ 6 5 4 3 2 f
---
Wri • i
. t A
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING'MAP
5 Attachment Two
4
N
7m
Im
1►
,. PARCEL 1
• • -�
a
�yis�,I �l�w ry 1 �.t��.✓� � t /Alrt�+r �
PARC
V V
.13 WI
o
i
ids: -pit s
9 4 fat y 1 U S ¢
l�w►�
r
• c�eJ e G r o,
3° .t u N
•I
f �
SITE PLAN
(Proposed Lot Division)
6 � Attachment Three
4
N
•
...: 401b 1
- s X20
6 0 3 f ,
• . �. y l •
v .. • qb
:• \•JI �.•�.1 -. :J.� •',• :.. •'•:• -• :'I.
.1 .�.•.: .•�::: • - :: is
-- ,.� �•: - -.:,•� ,fir• .� , • w:.; :�i:.'•'::yv: 8 • L W O - `y L ,
.• ..... . ti•::.�.: - �•:.� •.•. \�. ' -% ' �: J : - .�� :• • :tit ti'.1�• :..� Imo..::... ! .
=:: �::: � : �ti''' :: -. - .�. =: PROPOSED ..
. :::= ::.:... ':::: •::. .:.::.� CLAUSEN ADDITION ,
� ti •.ti :r :- �v:.ti.: :.:.: ;: .:�-: ' -� tii� ' : {t• ;::• =:: .tip'= •' ' � • '
. ; i irr i;: :•:�� ,�.; -:�• ... .... �� � ti :: •.tip:. {._ :t := :{� { {:;:: .
sw4
�j
Am
-- • � • • � B�iZ6 LRSo t
. ,
13
41L
r • • ..
�r
• Ur 14 � � _♦ : �. _ . z
L 46
1
•
• . `— . `� • r
• • •
o
Ic V o
Mal
V% dim
low
ft
GM
OEM-
•� . f / .,• •� ��
. --# •a
.._ —
Area Street Al i gnrnent , - Alternative A
• (Selected by council 4- 23 -84)-
.. .. - .
--= - Attachment Four
�` TWIN OAKS ADDITION 7
-1 � � � �� -� ' • X11
r
I
Z
� • � � _. w .� . _ _ � _ _ ... -r � JCS � � l 1..► •. r. � _. � • � • • _ , � ♦ : � ,-
dD
.1•:.:..y :� • NOV.*
r .. O AL
... - —
&ELL WOO
i
'v
'• '' : f' :.': •�, -:•:• •• ' C llr. ' • l •
•� :ti•: • •::: •.•. .. i�ti�-:•
-- .twit ' �� %►•= :•: -: ' =: ='• = ::- ::•::::•:.•.:1�.� .•.
a:
x--x.-
•......
Ar.
OVOOP
=Mw
•`� taw - 7
• r
to
f r
_1
z ' ID
-- s
- !• i �b
•_ - ! fir 6 c a �.►.
�� ^ Q
i f :>"' tea•► :+ , ` �4 ,,,•
ap
Sol I
4 h qr
•
Area St a reet Ali 9 nmeht Alternative B
( Rejected by council 4 -23 -84 )
TWIN OAKS ADD I T I M . �.
Attachment, ive
y
0. �. do _
•
- • - • -. •
•
/Z O
• j OOP /2 D /3D /ap '' ' , � 3p � • • s/ � 1
do
• 1
• •�= s c - !
1
- WAMP � -
•i •
• - '�'� :t :mot :'.-' •.•
•.�.::•.. •. .
.
0 40P
• ••i: -:• .. �....� .- : =. '. :v. � . = •" : � =:�� ::- -.vim : ' !
•�.. •.. -.tiff :':�:� -:::a- i.
•• -.� :� : -y .. � -:: ti p:. •:•'= •:: � :..: .�_ •. }•:-.. •-
.: • w •�.: V .► • ;1aC
v _ -• C - - ,
_ 1 6 1
01� * IM. i
L
-• Z T 1 _
low :_ NEW
• !
• _`
Ana
• ���
• •• ; �..��� f
• • �
d
• • I • • •• • • • • - • ♦ • ' - •
• JD •
•
• S J �_
at
r � ,
•
Area Street. Alignment Alternative C
TWIN OAKS ADDITION - • (Rejecte Council 4 #.23 -84 }
9 Attachment Six
PUBLIC VACATION PETITION
We, the undersigned, being a majority of the owners of land abutting on the (street),
(alley), or (public easement) described as:
N 30 Y t;t4 w
W / 14
do hereby petition the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, to vacate the above described area.
Name
Signature (Please print or type) Abstractor's List Na.
1r14D jv,A s Co 1 t�
Lo 4t OL4� .,P I
10 Attachment Seven
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the
city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and
held in the council chambers in said city on the day of
,1985 at 7 p.m.
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
WHEREAS, Thomas Coil initiated proceedings to vacate the public
interest in the following- described real property:
The North 30 feet of the West 256 feet of the S.W. 1/4 of the
N.E. 1/4 of the S.W. 1/4 of Section 17, Township 29 North, Range
22 West.. (Document No. 1556589)
WHEREAS, The procedural history of this vacation is as follows:
1. This vacation was initiated by Thomas Coil on November 5
1984;
2* A majority of the owners of property abutting said street
easement have signed a petition for this vacation;
3. This vacation was reviewed by the planning commission on
January 7, 1985. The planning- commission recommended to the city
council that this vacation be approved;
4. The city council held a public hearing on ,
1985 to consider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and
mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were
given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The
council also considered reports and recommendationg of the city staff
and planning commission.
WHEREAS,'upon vacation of the above - described street easement,
public interest in the property will accrue to the following - described
abutting property:
Subject to streets and easements and except the West 163 feet
lying south of the North thirty feet and except the East 163 feet
of the West 489 feet of the South 85 feet of the North 455 feet,
the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 17, Township
29, Range 22.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood City Council that
it is in the public interest to grant the above- described vacation on
the basis of the following findings of fact:
1. The possibility of a street along this alignment was rejected
as part of the approval of the Twin Oaks Addition plat.
� 2. Within Twin Oaks plat under construction a street can no
longer be cost- effectively constructed along this alignment.
3. The existence of the street easement unnecessarily restricts
development of the properties to the north and south.
Adopted this day of , 1985e
Seconded by Ayes- -
STATE OF MINNESO'T'A )
)
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS.
CITY OF MA PL EWOOD
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk
of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have
carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a
regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of
1985, with the original on file in ' my off i,ce and the same is a full,
true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to
vacation of this street easement.
Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city
this day of , 1985.
City Clerk
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
A. Street Vacation south of 1858 Desoto (Coil)
The planning commission moved the following -resolution be approved by the
city council:
WHEREAS. Thomas Coil initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in
the following-described real property:
The North 30 feet of the West 250 feet of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the
SW 1/4 of section 17. Township 29, North, Range 22 West (Document No. 1556589)
WHEREAS the rocedural history of this vacation is as follows:
P y
1. This vacation was initiated by Thomas Coil on November 5. 1984;
2. majority 'orit A ma of the owners of property - abutting said street easement
have signed a peti ti .6n for this vacation;
3, This vacation was reviewed b the planning commission on January 7.
_ y
1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that this
vacation be approved.
WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above- described street easement. public
ant property
erest in the will accure to the following - described abutting property:
Subject to streets and easements and except the West 163 feet lying
south of the North 30 feet and except the EAst 163 feet of the West 489
feet of the South 85 feet of the North 455 feet, the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4
of the SW 1/4 of Section 17, Township 299 Range 22
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that
it is in the P ublic interest to grant the above- described vacation on the basis
of the following findings of fact:
1. The possibility of a street alon g this al i gnment was rejected as part
_
of the approval of the Twin Oaks Addition plate
_= 2, Within Twin Oaks plat under construction, a street can no longer be
cost effectively constructed. along this alignments
3. The existence
of the street easement unnecessarily restricts develop-
ment of the properties to the north and south.
� v
i
c;tion by Coii-c,- - <
�a.�..�a.. >i.
r
Section 1.
MEETINGS
City Council shall hold reg ular meetings on the second and fourth
Regular: The C y
of each month at 7:00 P ,,,M . , pr any
that when the day fixed for y
-M ondays w as a le al hot ida ,such meeting
regular meeting falls on a day designa by la g Y
shall be held at the same hour on the next succeeding Thursday not a holiday.
- 6 - 1/23
Spec ial: The Mayor or any two members of the Council by writing filed with the
Ty Clerk at least twenty -four hours before such meeting may call a special
meeting. Notice of such meeting shall state the purpose or purposes thereof
and shall be personally delivered to each member or be left at the members usual
place of residence with a person of suitable age and discretion then residing
therein, or written notice thereof shall be left in a conspicuous place at. the
residence if no such person can be found there. The notice shall be delivered
twelve hours` before the meeting time. Except for trivial natters, business
transacted at a special meeting shall be limited to that mentioned in the call.
Emergenc y meetings i n s may be called at any time providing all members of the Council
sign waivers of notice to such meeting and said waivers shall be filed wit.
the City Clerk.
Place: All meetings shall be held in the Council Chambers of the Maplewood Municipal
uilding unless there is a published notice designating another location.
Presiding Officers: The Mayor shall preside at all meetings of the Council. In
the absence of the Mayor the Acting Mayor shall preside. In the absence of
both, the Councilmembers shall elect one of their number as temporary chairman.
Ouorum: Three of the Council shall constitute a quorum at any meeting of
die Counc i 1, but a smaller number may adjourn from time to time.
Order of Business: At , the hour appointed for meeting, the members shall be called
to order b y the Mayor, or in his absence by the Acting Mayor, or in the absence
of both by the Clerk. The Clerk shall call the roll, note the absentees and
announce whether a quorum is present. In the absence of the Clerk, the Mayor
shall appoint a secretary protem. Upon the appearance of the quorum the Council
shall proceed to business which shall be conducted in the following order:
A. Call to Order
B. Roll Call
C. Approval of Minutes
D. Approval of Agenda
E. Consent Agenda
F. Public Hearings
G. Awarding of Bids R
H. Unfinished Business
I. New Business
J. Visitor Presentations
K. Council Presentations
.,L. Administrative Presentations
M. Adjournment
Curfew: No additional agenda item will be discussed after 10:30 P.M. No discussion
v
will continue past 11:00 P.M. Meetings adjourned under this policy will be
continued to the next Thursday at 7:00 P.M. The continued meeting will start
at the P oint on the agenda where the adjournment occurred. No new items will
be added to the continued meeting agenda.
First Regular: At the first regular Council meeting in January of each year, the
o (1) designate the depository of City Funds, (2) designate the
official newspaper, (3) choose an Acting Mayor from the membership of the Council
who shall perform the duties of the Mayor during the disability or absence of
the Mayor, and (4) review the Rules of Procedure of the City Council and make
any necessary changes if such changes are desired.
- 7 - 1/23
Section 2.
AGENDA FOR REGULAR MEETING
(1) All matters to be submitted to the Council shall be filed not later than 12:00
Noon on the Monday prior to the Monday Council meeting at which consideration
is desired,, and shall be delivered to the C i t v Manager, or in his absence the
City Clerk. In unusual circumstances and when the matter does not require
invest i gat i on, an item may be accepted after the deadline upon the approval
of the City Manager.
(2) Except for trivial matters, no item or bus i nes.s shall be considered for action
by the Council which does not appear on the agenda for the meeting, except
that an item or urgent business which requires immed i ate action and is so deter-
mined by a majority of the Council may be considered by the Council whether
or not there i s a f u l l membership present. The Council will hear all reasonab 1 e
citizen petitions, requests and statements however, such items which do not
specifically appear on the agenda shall be deferred to a future meeting for
more careful consideration and study if Council action other than filing, is
required or requested.
The Mayor and each Councilmember shall be provided with a copy of the agenda,
minutes of the previous meeting, and any other reports and information pertinent
to the agenda at least seventy -two hours prior to.each regular Council meeting.
No matter may be submitted for Council action by any admi ni strat i ve ' official ,
department head, . or employee unless it has first been presented to the City
Manager for i n c l u s i o n on the agenda.
Section 3
MINUTES :
(a) The City Clerk shall keep a record of all Counc i 1 meetings.
(b) Unless a reading of the minutes of a Council meeting is requested by a member
of the Council, such minutes may be approved without reading if each member
has previously been provided a copy.
(c) The Council may, by motion carried by a majority vote, amend the minutes .
Such arrend i ng motion shall become a part of the minutes of the subsequent meeting.
Section 4.
DUTIES OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER:
The presiding officer shall preserve strict order and decorum at all meetings of
the Council. He shall state. every question coming before the Council, announce
the decision of the Council on all subjects, and decide all questions or order,
subject, however, to an appeal to the Council in which event a ma jor i ty vote of
the Council shall govern and conclusively determine such questions or order. He
may vote on. a l l questions and on a r o l l call vote determine the order in which votes
are cast.
.Section 5.
RI OF DEBATE:
-8- 1/23
(a) The Mayor or other Presiding Officer may move, second and debate from the chair,
subject only to such limitations of. debate as are by the rules imposed on all
members and shall not be deprived of any of the rights and p r i v i l e g e s of a
Counci lmember by reason of his acting as the Presiding Officer.
(b) Every member desiring to speak shall address the chair, and upon recognition
by the Presiding Officer shall confine himself to the question under debate
avoiding all personalities and indecorous language.
(c) A member, once recognized, shall not be interrupted when speaking unless it
be to call hire to order or to vote on a motion to close a debate, or as herein
otherwise provided. If a member, while speaking, be called to order, he shall
cease speaking until the quest ion of order is determined and if in order, he
shall be .permitted to proceed.
(d) A motion to reconsider any action taken by the Council must be made at the
meeting at which such action was taken or at the next regular meeting of the
Council and must be made by a member of the Council who voted with the prevail -
ing side, provided that if such motion to reconsider is passed, then the parties
e n t i t l e d to notice on the o r i g i n a l action shall be notified, and the recon-
s i derat i on of the action sha"l l be taken at the next regular meeting f o l l o w i n g
passage of the motion to reconsider.
(e) A Counci lmember may request, through the Presiding Officer, the privilege of
having an abstract of his statement on any subject under consideration by the
Council, or the reason for his dissent from or support of any action of the
Council, entered in the minutes. Such `a request may be made at the time of
said action or consideration or at the time of the adoption of said minutes.
Unless the Council, by motion, objects, such statements shall be entered in
the minutes.
(f) The Clerk shall enter in the minutes a synopsis of the discussion on any question
coming in proper order before the Council.
Section 6.
A DDRESSING THE COUNCIL:
Any person desiring to address the Council shall first secure the permission of
the Presiding Officer.
Each person addressing the Council shall give his name and address in an audible
tone for the records, and unless further time is granted by the Presiding Officer,
shall limit his address to five minutes., except at a public hearing when the limit
shall be ten minutes. All remarks should be addressed to the Council as a body
and not to any member. No person other than the Council and the person having the
floor, shall be permitted to enter into any discussion, either directly or through
a member of the Council, without the permission of the Presiding Officer. No question
shall be asked a Counci lmember or any member of the Administrative Staff except
through the Presiding Officer,
Section 7.
GENERAL RULES OF ORDER:
_ .g an 1/23
Robert's Rules of Order and Robert's Parliamentary Law sha 1 l be accepted as an author-
ity on parliamentary practice on matters not specifically covered and in case of
a conflict these rules shall govern.
i
SPrtinn A_
VOTING:
lln less a member of the Council states that he is not voting, hi silence shall be
recorded as an affirmative vote.
Section 9.
DECORUM AND ITS ENFORCEMENT:
The Council members, while the Council is in session, must preserve order and decorum,
and a member shall neither, by conversat or otherwise, delay or interrupt the
proceedings or the peace of the Council, nor disturb an v member while speaking or
refuse-to obey the orders of the Council or i Presiding Off i cer, except as other-
wise herein provided.
_�Prt i nn in-
ORDINANCES, RESOL MOTIONS AND REPORTS:
(a) Ordinances, resolutions, and other - natters or subjects requiring action by
the Counci shall be introduced and sponsored by a member of the Council except
±hat. the Ci P�anager or Attorney may present ordinances, resolutions and other
matters or subject to the Council.
(b) Every ordinance and resolution shall be presented in writing and _read in full
at a Council meeting; provided, however, that the reading of an ordinance or
resolution may be dispensed with by unanimous consent.. Upon the vote on ord-
inances, resolutions. and motions, the ayes and nays shall be recorded unless
the vote is declared unanimous. Upon the request of any member of the Council,
the vote shall be by roll call of all members of the Council as provided under
DUTIES OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER in this resolution. A majority vote of all
members of the Council shall be required for the passage of all ordinances,
motions and resolutions except as otherwise provided by lain and except that amend-
ment s to the comprehensive plan shal require at least f our votes in favor.
(c) Every ordinance other than emergency ordinances shall have two public readings
as provided in Subsection (b) of this Section, and at least fourteen days shall
elapse between the first reading or waiver thereof and the second reading or
waiver thereof.
(d) An emergency ordinance is an ordinance necessary for the immediate preservat-
ion of the publ peace, health, morals, safety or welfare in which the emer-
gency is defined and declares!, passed by a vote of at least four members of
the Council, as recorded by ayes and nays. No prosecution shall be based upon
the provisions of any emergency ordinance until the same has been filed with
the City Clerk and posted in three conspicuous places i n the City and twenty -
four hours after such filing and posting shall have elapsed or until the ord-
inance has been published, unless the person, persons, firms or corporations
charged with violations thereof shall have had notice of the passage thereof
prior to the act or ommission complained of.
- 10 1/23
� (e)
• resolutions shall 1 be filed with the Clerk and . made a part
All ordinances and resolutio be filed with
' correspondence shall
Reports, petitions and
of the minutes. Rep p
the Clerk and made a part of the minutes by reference*
Section
CONDUCT
OF CITY EMPLOYEES:
(a)
• art in the discussions of the City Counci 1 and may
The City Manager may take p sar for the welfare
he deers necessary
amend to the Council such measures as may .
recommend He
'cient. administration of the affairs of • the City.
of the people and efficient
b Minnesota Statutes
all the r powers and duties prescribed, y
shall have 9 d that the Ci Council 1 i the poli
it i s s
in re and thereto, however, recognize , • . ..
9 and the City t Manager shall confine his d i scus s i ons
making body for the City a y 9 his know -
based on
' meetings nas to statements of fact, recommendations ons bas
at Council mee . ,, •
• explanati ons of the reasons for the same, and any natters
and explan a
lege and experience
p e r t a i n i n g to admi n i strati on .
(b)
' Ma or Attorney, shall enter into
No City Employee, other than the C ity ty 9 d to such
to directed
discussions of the y Cit Council except answer questions
employee, o y ee, or to present . factua 1 information.
P
(c)
• s shall not. be construed to limit the
The above regulations of City employee appearance
Council 1 of any City employe oyee when such app
C •
appearance before the C y against some articular
' a taxpayer or member of the public, for or a,, P •
made as
is
n such employ has an interest in
issue under discussion by the Council when
the outcome thereof.
Cartinn 12_
WAIVER
By 4/5 consent of all Councilmembers these rules, may be waived.
Section 13.
ADJOURNMENT:
A mot i on to adjourn shat y 1 always s be in order and decided without debate*
SPr.nndpd by rnijnr i lmPmhPr Ma i d a _ AVPS - a ll-
- - A DA L
)RTf ST. PAUL - MAPLEWOOD - O K E SCHOOLS
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 622
2055 E. Larpenteur Ave. - -
Maple MN 55109
1 4-
January 15, 1985
Barry Evans, City Manager
t '
City of Maplewood w
1380 Frost Avenue
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
RE: Lydia /McKnight Property - Proposed Purchase Agreement
Barry:
Please find enclosed a Proposed Purchase Agreement on the Lydia /McKnight
property.
If this Agreement is acceptable with you and your legal counsel, please
let me know, and I will give you three originals for signature by your
Mayor and Clerk, and notarization.
In the meantime, I am discussing this with the Finance Committee of the
Board of Education, and pending their approval, will be asking our Board
of Education to approve the Purchase Agreement January 24, 19850
If you should have any questions, please call; otherwise, I will be waiting
for the signed documents from you by the 21st.
Sincerely yours,
R x-e� C-
Brian C. Buchmayer
Director of Business Affairs
BCB:sc
Encl.
M
4
PURCHASE AGREEMENT
Independent School District No. 622, a public school cor-
poration with offices at 2.055 E. Larpenteur Avenue, Maplewood,
Minnesota, 55109, under the laws of the State of Minnesota,
("Seller"), is the owner of property located at the intersec-
tion of Lydia and McKnight, in the City of Maplewood,. Minnesota,
and legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
Seller desires to sell to the. City of Maplewood, a municipal
corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, with prin-
cipal offices at 1 380 Frost Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota, 55109,
"Buyer ") , and Buyer desires to purchase from Seller the parcel
of ro ert described in Exhibit "A" hereto, of a total area of
P P y
12.07 acres, more or less, upon and subject to the terms and
conditions hereinafter set forth.
Now, therefore, in consideration of the premises, the mutual
covenants and agreements herein contained and good and valuable
consideration described below, the receipt and sufficiency
whereof is ' hereby acknowledged, ,the parties hereto mutually agree
as follows:
Seller agrees to sell and convey to Buyer and Buyer agrees
to purchase and accept from Seller the property located at the
intersection of Lydia and McKnight in the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota, and legally described in Exhibit "A" hereto, subject
to easements, restrictions and reservations of record, for the
sum of One Hundred Twent y Five Thousand ' ($125 , 000) Dollars, which \
Buyer agrees to pay in the following manner:
-1-
y One Thousand ($1,000) Dollars earnest money
upon the execution of this Agreement, the
receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged.
One Hundred Twenty Four Thousand ($124,000)
Dollars to be paid on or prior to April 11,
1985, the date of closing.
Closing shall take place a.t 10 o'clock a.m. on April 10, .
1985, at the offices of Messrs: Knutson, Flynn, & Hetland,
Suite 800, 345 Cedar, St. Paul, Minnesota, or at such other time
or place as may be mutually agreed by and between the parties..
Subject to performance by the Buyer of all obligations here-
in, the Seller agrees to execute and deliver a Warranty Deed
conveying in marketable title to said premises subject to the
following exceptions:
a. Building and zoning codes, ordinances,
state and federal regulations.
b. Restrictions relating to the use or
improvement of premises without effective
forfeiture provisions
c. Reservation of any minerals or mineral
rights to the State of Minnesota.
d. Utility drainage and other easements of
record.
Buyer acknowledges that it has physically examined and is
familiar with the site and applicable building codes and zoning
ordinances.
Buyer states its intention to develop the site for purposes
of y outh recreation and acknowledges that Seller has entered into
this Agreement in reliance upon said use of the property.
This contract contains the entire agreement between the
parties, and neither party has relied upon any verbal repres en-
-2-
4
tations, agreements, or understandings not set forth herein,
t
whether made by any agent or party hereto.
Seller agrees to deliver possession not later that I the date
of closing provided that all conditions of this Agreement have
been complied with.
This Agreement. shall not be assigned to any third party.
An y P and all special assessments due in 1985, or subsequently,
shall be paid by Purchaser.
Seller shall, within a reasonable time after execution of
this y
Agreement b both parties, furnish an Abstract of Title, or
g
a Registered Property Abstract, certified to date, to include
proper searches covering bankruptcies, and state and federal
Judgments. and Liens. Buyer shall be allowed thirty (30) days
after receipt thereof for examination of said Title and the
makin g y objection . of an thereto, and said objections to be made
in writing or deemed to be waived. If any objections are so
made, the Seller shall be allowed one hundred and twenty (120)
days to make such Title marketable.
If said Title is not marketable and is not made so within
one hundred and twenty (120) days from the date of written
objection thereto as above provided, this Agreement shall be null
and void, at the option of the Buyer, and neither principal shall
be liable for damage hereunto to the other principal. If the
Title to said property be made marketable or be so made within
said time and said Buyer shall default in any of the agreements
and continue in default for a period of ten (10) days, then and
-3-
in that h case the Seller may terminate this contract, time being
Y
b
of the essence thereof. This P rovis ion shall not deprive either
art of the right of enforcing the specific performance of this
party g
contract provided such action to enforce such specific perform
t
ance shall be commenced within six months (6) after such right of
action shall arise.
It is agreed b and between the parties the time is of the
g Y
essence of this contract. `
Wherever in this Agreement it shall be required and
permitted that notice or other communication or documents be
given or served b eithr arty to this Agreement to or upon the
other, such notice and demand shall be given or served, and shall
not be deemed to have been duly given or served, unless in
wittin g Y g or forwarded b registered or certified mail, postage
prepaid, addressed (or personally delivered) as follows:
To Seller at attention Brian Buchmayer,
Director of Business Affairs,
Independent School District No. 622
2055 East Larpenteur Avenue
Maplewood, Minnesota, 55109, with copy to:
Paul C. Ratwik, 345 Cedar, Suite 800,
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101.
To Buyer at City of Maplewood
1380 Frost Avenue
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
In witness whereof, the parties hereto have caused this
instrument to be duly executed this day of ,
19850
-4-
4
Independent School District
No. 622
B
Bette Jayne Haak
Its Chairperson
B
G. Paul Sandberg
Its Clerk
The City of Maplewood
By
John Greavu
.Its Mayor
By -0
Lucille Aurelius
City Clerk
-5-
y
t
YF
•
EXHIBIT " A "
Legal description:
That part of the SW ;%, of the NW It of Section 1,
Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota,
described as follows: Beginning at the northwest
corner of said SW -, of the NW thence east along
the north line of said SW 1 4 of the NW � a distance
of 1012.86 feet to a point; thence south parallel
to the west line of said. SW 4 of the NW a distance
of 519.5 feet to a point; thence. west parallel to
the north line of said SW it of the NW 1 � to the west
line of said SW � of the NI; �- thence north along
the west line of said SW h of the NTW ` to the point
of beginning.
OA S �
1 . r' •
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand-- Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Code Amendment- -Trash Container Enclosures
DATE: January 3, 1985
SUMMARY
Request
Amend the ordinance which requires masonry enclosures for trash
dumpsters .
Reason for the Request
The present ordinance can create two problems:
110 An enclosure must be provided even if it-.would not be visible
from an adjacent property or street. This is an unnecessary expense.
9
2. Masonry enclosures may not be compatible with the main building.
For example, Skipper's restaurant, a wood - exterior building, must have
a masonry enclosure. It would then be sided with wood to match the
building for compatibility of design.
Comments
The ro osed amendment (page 3) would only require trash enclosures if
P P
they would be visible from adjacent property or streets. Furthermore,
to P rovide enclosures that are designed to be compatible with the
building, the developer should be given , the option of using wood,
masonry or another suitable material that provides adequate screening.
Masonry enclosures are preferred for durability. Wooden enclosures,
however, would be acceptable if they were protected in the front by
concrete-filled steel posts anchored in the ground at the front
corners of the enclosure. The posts. would prevent the enclosure from
being hit by a g arbarge truck.
Recommendation
Adoption of the ordinance amendment on page 3.
REFERENCE INFORMATION
Ex i st i nq Ordinance
1. Ref er to the amendment on page 3 .
2. Adopted: .11 -22 -82
Surve
Staff surveyed 27 metro cities, including those adjacent to Maplewood.
Twenty of them required trash enclosures, but permitted wood
construction. Four required they be of masonry construction and three
had no screening requirement.
1. Recommendation by the community design review board
2. First reading by -the city council
3. Second reading and public hear i ng by the city council
Jw
Attachments:
Ordinance amendment
2
E
ORDINANCE N0,
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE REQUIREMENTS
FOR SCREENING TRASH CONTAINERS
THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 36 -27(e) is amended as follows (additions are
underlined and deletions are crossed out):
Trash container enclosures shall be rovided around all t rash
containers and shall be one hundred 100 ) percent opaq The
shall be protected by concrete—filled steel posts, or the equivalent,
anchored in the ground at the front corners of the structure. If the
enclosure is masonry, the protective posts may be omitted.
In all instances, the enclosure must be of a design, material and
color compatible with the building and be kept in good repair.
Trash —ete rage — eeeta4eere— sh a44— be— eeeetrtieted— ee— tbree— {34 —e
w4th— bfee� —ef f — bTeek - -f aee —bf}ek r — ef— maeeefy— A gate that provides
one hundred (100) percent opaqueness shall be provided.' where -a—
dem peter —wee 4d— be— y4s4b4e—te_0e— ptjb4e —ef—f f ty-
The Community Design Review Board may waive any part of these
requirements if they find that the trash container would be hidden from
adjacent properties and streets.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and
publication.
y Passed by the Maplewood
City Council on
1985.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Ayes--
Nays--
n
C. Code Amendment --- -Trash Enclosures
Board Member Rossbach moved the board recommend to the city council
PP
a rova 1 of the amendment to the code as outlined in the staff report
dated January 3. 195.
Board Member Deans seconded Ayes --all
I
s
s
i
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM Directo of Community Development
SUBJECT: Annual Report -- Planning Commi
DATE: November 28, 1984 -
Section 25 - 23 (5) of c ity it code states that one of the duties of the
planning
commission is: "To review, prepare and make report to the
city council b y December thirty -first of each year regarding the city
comprehe p lan, along with recommendations for changes which the
commission may deem desirable.
Past Year
All but two of the thirteen plan amendments considered in 1984 were
initiated b the city .as part of the "downzoning program* (See page
y
The number of plan amendments dropped from 23 in 1983 to thirteen
3') T P
in 1984. It appears that as we near completio n of the "downzoning
program"
am" the plan is beginning to s t a b i l i z e . Further evidence is that
nine of the thirteen amendments were done in the first quay ter . There
were no changes in the fourth quarter*
1985 Work Program
I
sent out a memo on October 18 requesting suggestions for our 1985
work ro ram for specific projects or ways to improve what we are
P g
doin g now. The memo was sent to the council, HRA, planning commission
and community design review board. I received six replies.
The
planning commission reviewed all comments pertaining to a work
P g
prog ram, added new ones and rated each one's importance:
First Priority - -ver important, should be done, soon
1 Schedule a joint meeting with the council. to go over the
city
Land use plan and decide which areas should be revised. Also �� discuss the need for an upzoning program."
Study
the Beaver Lake neighborhood plan from Stillwater Road
2 '
to Larpenteur Avenue. (Initiated by c ouncil after a discussion
on Sterling Glen.)
3. Complete the .downzoning program*
improvement program ( required by law) 4. Update the capital p
5. Reduce the lot width in RM areas to 60 feet.
6 Increase the allowable density by bringing the people /unit
formula a in the comp rehensive plan into conformance with the 198
census.
7e Zero lot line ordinance
Second Priority -- important., but no rush
1. Update the text of the zoning code
2. Find an easier way to work with variance requests.
Third Priority--desirable, do when there is time
10 Investigate the "star. city" program (an economic development
program sponsored by the state).
2. There is a need to develop an economic base to "replace" that
which 3M will n be providing due to its decision to not expand in
Minnesota.
The commission also discussed a review of the city's development standards,
as requested by several developers, but did not rate this item. The
commission decided to wait for council direction.
Recommendation
Approve the 1985 work program.
1984 PLAN AMENDMENTS
Initiated by
Location
Council Action
Staff
West of Century Avenue, between
approved
Maryland and Midvale
F
Staff
Radatz Ave., east of White Bear Ave.
denied by PC
Staff
South of Roselawn, at McMenemy St.
approved
Staff
North of Roselawn, at McMenemy St.
approved
Staff
1850 -96 E. County Road B
approved
Staff
Parkway Drive -and Arcade
approved
Staff
Larpenteur Avenue and Agate Street
approved
Staff
Frost Avenue and English Street
approved
Staff
Radatz Ave., west of White Bear Ave.
no action
Council
County Road B and VanDyke Street
denied
Council
Maplewood West Blvd. -- Kennard St,
denied
Staff.
Proposed park, south of Roselawn
approved
WMIN
2665 Highwood Avenue
withdrawn
NAME
Jan
16
Feb.
6
Mar
5
Mar.
19
Apr,
2
Apr,
16
May
7
May
21
Jun.
4
Jul.
2
Aug.
6
Aug.
20
Sep
17
ct.
1
ct.
15
qov.
5
Nov
19
. Axdahl
,
A
A
A
'. Barrett
A
A
A
A
'. E l l of son
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
,. Fischer -
A
I. He j ny
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
I. Pellish
A
A
A
A
A
I. Prew
RES
I GNE
D
I. Robens
A
A
A
A
A
Res
gne
I. Sigmundik
A
A
A
S1 etten
A
A
A
A
A
). Whitcomb
A
A
A
). Larson
AAA
xxx
xxx
XXX
AAAXAA
xxx
xxx
xxx
xxx
xxx
XXX
'Y
xxx
xxx
xxx.XxYY
xxxx
xxxx
A
0
r
F. Annual Report
. P
The Pl anning , commission suggested -
ggested item 2 on page 2 include just th '
sentence and an attendance record shout � e f� rst
d be included with the re ort�.
P .
The planning commission moved the annual report be sent to the
council for their consideration, city
3
1 -7-85
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Economic Development Commission
DATE: January 18, 1985
Rte_ s t
The city council on December 10, requested an evaluation by staff of
T Y � the value of an economic development commission (E.DC) .
Do We Need an EDC?
The main concern is whether there is enough need for an EDC to justify
the staff time and expense. Maplewood ranked sixth out of 142 cities
in the metropolitan area in 1983 in new commercial building values.
Only Minneapolis, St. Paul, Eden Prairie, Burnsville and Plymouth were
ahead of us . In 1982 , we ranked tenth and in 1981, we ranked twelfth.
As Y ou can see, we already rank high and have been steadily increasing
compared to other cities.. 1984 looks like it was another good year.
We issued 124 commercial permits with a valuation of $18,656,414.
This com P ares.with 110 permits. and $15,258,860 in valuation in 1983.
How Effective is an EDC?
The idea behind an EDC is good, but the results of the enclosed survey
3 ) indicate that EDC's have generally not been effective in
(pag
bringing in new businesses to a ci ty. Over half of the cities that
have EDC s _rep y
' reported that the lacked d i rection and were inef fective in
attracting new business. Those with relatively active EDC 's could not
cite a business that had been attracted by the EDC, but they felt that
P
their P
EDC had im roved public relations with the business community.
There was also a common observation that the state's Star City Program
had P rovided a public relations program for their EDC, but it had not
resulted in any referrals of new business. _
What Does it Take to be Effective?
An effective. economic development program requires time, money and
P
ex ertise. Those commissions in the survey that were more successful
had a full -time economic development staff member, an.. economic
development ment consultant or a commission of knowledgeable businessmen
with the time to actively work on promoting the city.
A
contract with an economic development consultant generally costs
$ 20,000 to $30 , 000. A full -time staff person would be more. Finding
q ualified, volunteer commissioners with expertise in economic develop -
ment and the time to do an effective job is difficult. Any time from
our current staff would be at the expense of other commissions.. It
may be better to leave this kind of promotion to the chamber of
commerce until there is a greater need for it. Note that the planning
com
commission, in their annual report, recommends that economic
development be given a low priority for 1985.
How Are We Doinq with Residential Construction?
We should concentrate our efforts on residential, rather than
- commercial development. While commercial construction continues at a
high rate, residential construction has been relatively low compared
to other developing cities. The enclosed survey (page 10) of
developing cities points this out.
Council met with several developers in October who were complaining
that it was difficult to.build residential units in Maplewood because
our development policies are too restrictive. High taxes and the type
of land we have left \ to develop are other factors. Given our . rate of
housing construction, it would be advisable to review our development
standards and procedures to make sure that they are not unnecessarily
restrictive.
One way to do this would be to form an ad -hoc developers' committee.
They could also be used to review future changes in ordinances or
policies that directly - effect residential developers. The problem is
that the city tried to do this several years ago, but the committee
disbanded after two meetings because of lack of interest,
Recommendation
Take no action on an EDC, but discuss the idea of an ad -hoc
developers' committee with the developers who met with council in
October.
jc
Attachments:
1. Survey: EDC's
2 MN Star Cities
3. Article
4. Survey: residential permits
2
Survey of Other Cities: Economic Development Commissions
Staff surveyed the twenty metro cities closest to Maplewood in
population and the cities adjacent to use
Cities without an economic development commission: Fridley,
Roseville, White Bear Lake (they are planning one) , Golden Valley,
Crystal, New Hope, South St. Paul, Brooklyn Center, West St. Paul,
Columbia Hei 9 hts, North St. Paul, Little Canada and Shoreview..
Plymouth does not have an E but is star ting.a port authority and
they have an ad -hoc developers' committee that meets if there is a
problem that . of fects them.
Cities. with an EDC (comments are from their staff) :
Maple Grove:
Started two years ago. Nine members.. Monthly meetings. Not a Star
City. Have full -time economic development director on staff.
Accomplishments:
Review of sign ordinance, joint review of comprehensive plan with the
planning commission, stud i-ed cost of building in Maple Grove compared
to other cities, tried to improve the city's image with developers,
encouraged a local business to expand in the city rather than relocate
to another city.
Criticism:
Has not attracted any new business
Woodbury:
Started 6 months ago. Working on Star City status. Eleven members --
_
mostly businessmen. An active commission. Organized "Expo Day " - -a
bus tour and program for prospective developers who may consider
building in Woodbury. Have hired professional consultants.
Oakdale:
Started in 1983. Seven members. Monthly meetings.
Accomplishments:
Brochure on the city, greet new businesses, talk to businesses who
might consider building in Oakdale, review plans for new commercial
development and "upzoned" land for development with the planning
commission.
Newport:
//
' Just started. Not a Star City. Commission not very active.
Apple Valley:
F y 9
Four to five ears old. Working on Star City designation. No real
accomplishments. Difficult to bring in new businesses. Would be just,
as effective to go through the chamber of commerce.
.
attachment one
Cottage Grove:
Ten years old. Working on Star City designation. The EDC has not
done much because the commi ss ion members lack expertise and the
commission as a whole lacks focus. Must have people with expertise to
solicit business. Have hired professional consultants.
Eagan:
They are a Star City, but have not received any referrals of new
business from the state. EDC has not made any significant. accomplish-
ments A special effort to attract business is not needed because of
the large volume of development. that occurs naturally.
New Brighton:
Eleven members. Just started. No accomplishments yet.
Blaine:
Nine members, monthly meetings. They also have an economic develop-
ment coordinator on staff. The commission has not been effective
They lack a specific purpose and grants are declining. They are
working on becoming a Star City in order to improve their public
relations. Their of the Star Cities Program is that it has
limited value beyond public relations and does not attract new
business.
Coon Rapids:
Seven members, monthly meetings. The commission has been in existence
for many years, but is suffering from lack of interest and attendance
problems. They have a full-time staff member for the EDC that also
handles other city grants. They have also hired a consulting firm.
They are a Star City.
Accomplishments:
They created an independent, nonprofit development corporation
which P rocesses small business loans and built a building which
was sold to private businesses.
OW Review code amendments effecting development
low Studied ways to reduce electric rates to business. .
mom Surveyed local businesses to see why they located in Coon Rapids.
J
City bought a partially developed industrial park and is
marketing the land.
Burnsville:
Eleven members, monthly meetings, long existence, no significant
accomplishments.
4
Minnesota Star Cities Program
This is a program developed by the state to help local communities
organize and develop an economic development program. Refer to the
following pages for a list of- tasks that a city must complete to be
designated a Star City.
A state representative from the Star Cities Program stated that the
_ value of this program is not in attracting new businesses, but in
maintaining good relations with existing business. The state does not
get many calls from new businesses looking for a place to locate. The
main criteria that effects where a new business develops are good
access to highways and close proximity to their market. The Star
Cities .Program has not had a significant effect on this.
The city council approved of our participation in this program in 1981
if it did not require any significant staff time. After reviewing the
program, it appeared that significant staff time was required and the
program was dropped.
jc
5 attachment two
h
MINNES.orm DEPYU UMENT'OFENERGY
AND ECONOMIC DIEVEWPMENrl
480 (:EDAH
S I IA l �i .. Al 11(� 1' -.tit )' I: i i I tl 1
MINNESOTA STAR CITIES PROGRAM
D ESCRIPTION
The Division
of Business Development is committed to implementing a
statewide economic development strategy leading to increased private
and more jobs for state citizens To achieve this
sector Investment
.
goal
he "Minnesota Star Cities Program " was invented.. The program
encourages ment planning an p communities to take an active role in economic develop
d im lementation. For a community, the program be-
. - it r epresent ative (s) attending the Minnesota Star
gins with community
Cities Program training seminar At the seminar, staff of the Divi-
• Development explain what a community must do to be
sion of Business Deve p p -
as a "Minnesota Star City for Economic Development" by the
designated
r Plannin and Development* To receive deslgna
Department of En a gy , g tasks include
'on a c mmunity must complete ten (10) tasks. The
tl ,
1.
The
establishment of an organization responsible for
the economic development efforts of the communi ty.
r s responsibility must be designated by resolution
This re p Y �
of the local unit of government.
2. Creation of a local development corporation*
3. An assessment of the community through the completion
of a Community Profile*
4. Complet' of a five-year plan and strategy for econ-
w
ion
omic development. -W .
' one-year work program and . def i ned
fined
5 . 'Completion of a o y •
strategy which. relates to the five -year economic
development plan.
' slide resenta
7. Completion of a Y t ion on the community.
6. Completion of a s p
labor serve of the community and the
area in which it is located.
8. Completion of a five-year ear capital improvement plane
9. Completion
of a. fact booklet on th community to be
used
to market the city to prospective industries.
10. Completion
of an annual survey of industry presently
- located in the. community. The purpose of the survey
will be to determine expansion /relocat ion plans of the
industries and their legislative concerns.
In addition. the
community must organize a team of citizens whose
in the acity
function is to serve ca of representing and .market
p
the community to industries with plans for 'investmen t in new
6 JAN 16 1984
C.
-2-
facilities. The Division of Business Development will provide the
team with site selection criteria of an actual firm seeking a sit
location. The team.must prepare a proposal in response to the site
selection criteria and present the proposal to 'representatives of
the Division of Business Development Who will act in the rollplaying
capacity of representing the industrial firm. Division staff repre-
sentatives will critique the presentation made by the team. The
evaluation will result in a satisfactory or un sa.t i sf actory rating
for team performance. A satisfactory rating must be achieved by the
team prior to the community being officially designated as a "Star
City for Economic Development" by the Department of Energy., Planning
and Development. Upon designation, the community will receive an
award and other prescribed benefits from the Department. A Star
City will be annually reviewed by, the Department ,. to determine if the
community has maintained a level of performance which meets the re-
quirements for "Star City" designation.
7
dtatit con
S buin
. J lurio dti
in
1
w to et Wand Pat Pelstrin also was , an eco- , :. "We . hired them for their MAr•
Scott .' .
is development for their coRmm�ni- ; bat are not sure ho g g .
that's what has created the market nomic development • for keting and packaging skills," aai
staff writer, ties. ,. Mq said. Coon Ra ids and worked at a bank . City Manager Robert Thistle.
' and Cotta a G rove, ' y, it Is too, to say for our company,
In woodbnry [ , ; , ► i before ining Mulrooney as his . ,' `"may have • beeoa in
city officials say . their mumicipal whether the consultants will be
and Coon' Rapids pier. contract employees.
• • . � :, • .
Woodbury � • � r
staffs do not have the time to hard ul. , • # ' I . ' I `M Ranted to ct active and in- • ::i : ' be s firm b ting
' � • �� hired Mulrooney's firm because of • , e M Mulroo y' �
seU business prospects on the vir�' But with competition for bnsi�: ass contacts and knowl volved in ec000 c development, � with
toes of movie hue -year t�o®traets, it i34,000
Into their towns. ion increasing, de" tor James � ,its basin
B edge of municipal government and . Woodbury . Administra :. ipiece� in both cities to help them
In - Coon - Rapids,' of f I� SAY" , velopment- conscious cities
know i� g , ' Lacina said cif his city's decision to- t �� p sfld or�
further stren en the • - . a lot of work to Woo new business financing. e s firm. ``We Aeei&
they snot to , , takes n Ra ids , hire Mullroon q' 1.9
of city departments to wort
city's aggressive eco c naval- bush to their communities, . , Mulydoneq was Coo p ed are needed some with pacts that clboose to la
- t economic development
op�nent p : ' ' said consultant Michael Mnlroon- firs In Coon Ra ids, Nluvroone�► and ` S cage in the 'community.
ties are at the for ' e , resident of Business Develop- • for and started the Star Citq pro Rapids, tb : • .'�We assemble a strategy so t
All three ci q P Inc. while working. the state Pelstring have . co q ,
front of a n trend Fn municipal meat Services nomic develo anent work the j .
• have hired buss- . are man comnnnnities 5 of Energy • and Eco- P , . I Z
gover9una�t. The y c Develo anent.' . starved sa uity employees.. • �.� ,« . Ples� "r crultanb bustle econot� -.. _ . that. t additional +developt� ♦ P r w
r '
00
of
C
a
n
C"+•
C+
S
I
(D
fD
nS �' > •; _ w ►rte r vr+J..:.• —.- + ' .. �.�_ i ., __ _ _ ` ,, ..
.1 or low- interest government loans a _ �'•. : _ .. _ '
Dann Pale , • _ g � ,
because conventional financing s - -The most tangible iuccess is in ,
q� they Want," . ted and expensive. , . . _ Coon Rapids Where Bu.giness 1�
_ velopmeDt Services Inc. has
i ~ " If a city ants a In the past four. or five years, brought into the ci a � number of
Foe - our economy has pushed up Icon- n ew or �-
grocery store "we set
ventionalr interest , rates," Mul- eluding v'iking Pattern Co., Endo-
-s 8� t . mane said. Ironic s and Industrial Door Co. -.
.community, � be . y - -
�.Cottage Grove, the city coun- Also, : the . consulting firm ap�-,
!' _ we serve as ad- cil has hired Jock Robeartson of In- t4 be pumping new life into'
pis s Caf al is to et ternational Development Consult- '
YS 8 P the city - owned. Coon Rapids Indus- . .
des said. ants. on a ;20,400 one -year contract" trial Park:
"; .. to contact new or expanding busi- -,
is cannot get that nesses and show them In Iess than nine months, MM , I, �
Abe Oten will go after sites in the community. -, money's firm has - lined up : j
that the city nary deals with about five busi►
e mod: - ..; :,; •�• "We have excellent con�merrial to locate is the Thist �.. _ _ . •, '..� park, . � - and industrW pr es to offer sai d. J
"As fA
, Plans, that is developers," said 'chard I.ewis, ' • a�
np '� priorities," Pel- assistant ci rnana er. `But we However Wood and Cottage
said. ,� . .' g � g
�8 _ don't have the time to market the Grove have rea et to new busi
y P
po6e p r os pec t shows sites. ; - . _ ness from the consultants. - •
an interest W Moving into a city, - .
his firm W� tries to Work out a Whether business consultants sultants ae- _ ; �".We, expect that a pro gram like
financing pa igoe for it, Mulrooa- tually will generate new business' thzs Will take .some time, Lewis
ey said.
�,� � for communities to be '• •
.�;. sees. Coon Rapids has had its busi-
Cites - offer' ness consultants for .about two • . • Said Lacing, "Ho fully they
prospects : finaachg incentives, years While Woodbury and Cottage Will be su�ul work them - 00
such
as tax revenue bonds Grove have had them for less than serve. out of a job." '
r 1
Survey of Other Cities: Residential Permits
The following is a listing of the developing cities closest to us in
ulation, showing each city's total new residential permits for all
P o P
types of housing in 1983. A similar list is included for the cities
adjacent to us.
Total Residential
Cit 1980 Population Permits for 1983
Coon Rapids 35,820 742
Burnsville 35,674 517
Plymouth 31,615 831
Blaine 28 , 558 557
Ma lewood 26,990 236
Apple Valley 21,818 489
Eagan 20,532 681
Maple Grove 20 610
Cottage Grove 18,994 77
Shoreview 17,300 _ 555
ADJACENT CITIES
White Bear Lake
North St. Paul
Oakdale
Woodbury
Newport
Roseville
Little Canada
vadnais Heights
St. Paul
1
93
100
74
335
23
54
38
104
671
attachment four
10
T .- q
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: CITY CLERK.
REGARDING: AMENDMENT TO CODE RELATING TO UTILITY BILLING
DATE: JANUARY 21 1985
The attached amendment to the Sewer Utility Billing Ordinances is proposed for first
reading.
Section 28 -24 is amended to delete the delinquency charge of $1.00. It now reads "10%
or $1.00 whichever is greater ". The present billing system is not able to handle two
alternate de 1 i nquency charges without costly modifications. There are only about 10 accounts
that this change would effect.
Section 28 -23 is amended to delete:
1) Residents billed at the senior citizen rate.
2) Properties for which someone other than occupant has requested to be billed.
i
r�
ORDINANCE NO. 570
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
SECTIN'.28 -23 AND SECTION 28 -24
OF THE MAPLEWOOD CODE
The Maplewood City Council Does Hereby Ordain As Follows:
Section 1. Section 28 -23 (a) the Maplewood Code of Ordinances is hereby amended as
follows:
Section 28 -23. Statements.
(a) All accounts shall be billed quarterly except for those that have city
utility billings totaling six hundred dollars ($600.00) or more per year in which
case they shall be billed monthly. Statements shall be mailed to "occupant"
at the address of the property except for Commercial Accounts.
Section 2. Section 28 -24 (a) the Maplewood Code of Ordinances is hereby amended as
follows:
Section 28 -24. Delinquent accounts.
(a) There shall be added to all statements not paid by the date indicated in
section 28 -23 a delinquency charge of ten (10) percent of the amount due.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication.
Passed by the City Council
of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota,
this day of 1985.
M ayor
ATTEST:
Ayes -
C ity Clerk N ays -