Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985 01-14 City Council Packete.2 AGENDA Maplewood City Council 7:00 P.M., Monday, January 14, 1985 Municipal Administration Building Meeting 85 -01 (A) CALL TO ORDER (B.) ROLL CALL (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Meeting 84 -24, November 8, 1984 20 Meeting 84 -27, December 20, 1984 D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA lr.. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion in the form 1 fisted below. There will be no separate discussion on these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Accounts Payable 240 Tousl ey Addition Utilities Acceptance - / 3. Budget Adjustment - Inspectors 40 Sergeants Pay Rates (F) PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7: 00 • Rezon i n g : 2086 Edgerton (4 Votes) -— 9 2. 7:10; Code Amendment: Setbacks & Lot Dimensions (4 Votes) f37-e 3. 7:20• Variance: 2158 Rice St. Sinclair Station) - 40 7:30 • Frost Ave. Improvement Project r i e 50 7:45; Tax- Exempt Mortgage Revenue Financing (Health Resources) (G) AWARD OF BIDS (H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS 19 Reconsideration - Brooks Superette Rezoning 20 Older Adult Home Sharing 3. Architectural Alliance Contract CIS NEW BUSINESS I • Water Main Petition - Ripley Ave, 2. Feasibility Stud - y Connor Ave. 30 CDRB Appeal - 325 Ros el awn 4• P. A.'C. for Neighborhood 9 od Parks 5 • Apartment Storage Space oe ( Readin 60 Planning Commission Resi na g t i orl 70 Council Appointments: a. Acting Mayor b. Planning Commission C. Official Newspaper d. Rules of Procedure em. Suburban Rate Authority (J) VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 8. 9. 10. (l) ADMINISTRRTTVE PRESENTATIONS MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, November 8, 1984 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 84 - 24 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was.lcalled to order at 7:OO.P.M._by Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilperson Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilperson Present MaryLee Maids, Councilperson Present Michael T. Wasiluk, Councilperson Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the agenda as amended 1. Election and Machines 2. No Smoking 3. Commissioners Party 4. Kennard 5. Gervais - Keller 6. City Manager 7. McKnight Water 8. City Hall Seconded by Councilperson Wasiluk. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved, Seconded Consent Agenda, Items l thro 1. Accounts Payable. - all, to approve the Approved the accounts (Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses Check Register dated 10 -30 -84 through 11 -02 -84 - $285,595.17; Part II - Payroll dated 11 -02 -84 - $60,700.69) in the amount of $345,295.86. 2. Budget Transfer - Hydrant Fund. Approved the following budget transfer to cover repairs on the three water booster stations: 03- 4910 -60 Contingency to 03- 4470 -60 Repair & Mtn. - $1830.00 Unappropriated Fund Balance to 03- 4470 -60 Repair & Mtn. - $4430.00 11/8 3. Budget Transfer - V.E.M. Fund Approved the following budget transfer: Contingency Account 96- 4910 -59 to Repair & Mtn. 96- 4420 -59 - $9,020.00 4• Budget Transfer - Street Maintenance Approved the following budget transfer: Signs & Signals Acct. 01- 4220 -52 to Fees for Services 01- 4480 -52 - $2110.00 5. Final Payment - 78 - 10 Resolution No. 84 - 11 - 164 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project No. 78 -10, Hillwood Drive /Dorland Road Improvements, and has let a construction contract, therefore, pur- suant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, said project has been certified as completed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the project is completed and final payment on the con- struction contract is hereby authorized. 6. Final Payment - 81 - 12 Resolution No. 84 - 11 - 165 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project No. 81 -12, Joint Holloway Avenue Improvements, and has let a construction contract, therefore, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, said project has been certified as completed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the project is completed and final payment on the con- struction contract is hereby authorized. 7. Cancellation of Special Assessments - Ramsey County Resolution No. 84 - 11 - 166 RESOLVED that the special assessments for Project 78 -9 (Frost Avenue Improvements) together with - penalties and interest for the following properties be cancelled: (D /P No. 5312) D/P No. 5312 57 - 01610 - 030 - 25 57 - 01610 - 020 - 63 D/P No. 53¢3 57 - 01610 - 020 - 63 $32,385.60 13,348.68 $ 149.31 - 2 - 11 /8 E I IN 11 Budget Transfer - Police Approved the budget transfer from Police Service Account 01- 4420 -42 to Civil Service Account 01- 4480 -05 in the amount of $1,000.00 to cover the cost of Civil Service testing for new police officers. Budget Transfer - Emergency Services Approved the budget transfer of $1400.00 from City Hall Telephone System Allocation to Civil Defense Emergency Services Account 01- 4430 -12. Time Extension - Schwichtenberg Approved a one -year extension for the Schwichtenberg 2nd Addition preliminary plat subject to the original conditions. Renewal of Off -Sale Liquor Licenses for 1985. Resolution No. 84 - 11 - 167 RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, that the following Off -Sale Liquor Licenses having been previously duly issued by this Council, are hereby approved for renewal for one year, effective January 1, 1985, with approvals granted herein subject to satisfactory results of required Police, Fire and Health inspections: C & G Liquors 1347 Frost Avenue J & R Liquors 2730 Stillwater Road Laber Liquors 1730 Rice Street Maplewood 'Vine Cellar 1231 Frost Avenue Party Time Liquors 1740 Van Dyke Avenue Red Wagon Liquors 2290 Maplewood Drive Sarrack's International Wines & Spirits 2305 Stillwater Road Spark Liquors 3000 White Bear Avenue 12. Renewal of On -Sale Liquor Licenses for 1985. Resolution No. 84 - 11 - 168 RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, that the following On -Sale Liquor Licenses having been previously duly issued by this Council, are hereby approved for renewal for one year, effective January 1, 1985, with approval granted herein subject to satisfactory results of required Police, "Fire and Health inspections. Bali Hai Restaurant 2305 White Bear Avenue Chicone's Bar & Cafe, Inc. 2289 E. Minnehaha Keller Lake Clubhouse 2166 Maplewood Drive Bernard's 3035 White Bear Avenue - 3 - 11/8 Dean's, Inc. 1986 Rice Street Esteban's of Maplewood, Inc. 3069 White Bear Avenue Fox & Hounds 1734 Adolphus Garrity's 1696 White Bear Avenue Gulden's, Inc. 2999 N. Highway 61 Holiday Inn of Maplewood 1780 E. County Road D Hook 'n Ladder 2280 Maplewood Drive Hideaway 70 E. County Road B. Maplewood Moose Lodge #963 1946 English Street (Club License) 13. Rehearing of Mogren Landscaping IDR Resolution No. 84 - 11 - 169 WHEREAS, LeBistro Cafe 1146 -48 Maplewood Mall Maple Wheel Lounge 2220 White Bear Avenue Maplewood Bowl 1955 English Northernaire Motel, Inc. 2441 Highway 61 Red Lobster 2925 White Bear Avenue Red Rooster 2029 Woodlyn Town Crier 1829 North St. Paul Road Chuck E. Cheese's Pizza Time Theatre 2950 White Bear Avenue (Beer and Wine License) (a) Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, known as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (the "Act ") gives municipali- ties the power to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of the en- couragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to prevent so far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; (b) The City Council of the City of Maplewood (the "City ") has received from 2960 Associates, a general partnership to be organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota with Gerald C. Mogren, Robert C. Mogren and Lee Clintsman as general partners amd others to be named (the "Company ") a proposal that the City assist in financing a pvoject hereinafter described, through the issuance of its industrial revenue bonds (which may be in the form of a single debt instrument) (the "Bonds ") pursuant to the Act; (c) Before proceeding with consideration of the request of the Company it is necessary for the City to hold a public hearing on the proposal pursuant to Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b, Minnesota Statutes;' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: - 4 - 11/8 1. A public hearing on the proposal of the Company will be held at the time and place set forth in the Notice of Hearing hereto attached. 2. The general nature of the proposal and an estimate of the principal amount of bonds to be issued to finance the proposal are described in the attached form of Notice of Hearing. 3. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Energy and Economic Development Authority, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together with proposed forms of all attachments and exhibits thereto, is on file in the office of the City Clerk. 4. The actions of the City Clerk is causing notice of the public hearing and in describing the general nature of the Project and estimating the principal amount of the Revenue Bonds to be issued to finance the Project and in preparing a draft of the proposed application to the Authority, for approval of the Project are in all respects ratified and confirmed. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this 8th day of November, 1984. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, will meet at the City Hall in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, at 7:20 P.M. on November 26, 1984, to consider the proposal of 2960 Associates, a Minnesota general partnership to be formed with Gerald C. Mogren, Robert C. Mogren and Lee Clintsman as general partners and others to be named (the "Company "), that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter described by the issuance of industrial development revenue bonds. Description of Project The proposed project shall consist of the acquisition of land and the construction and equipping thereon of an approximately 15,000 square,foot office building to be located on the East side of White Bear Avenue between Lydia Avenue and Beam Avenue directly North of the Maplewood East Shopping Center in Maplewood. The maximum aggregate estimated principal amount of bonds or other obli- gations to be issued to finance this project is $1,200,000. The project will be initially owned and operated by the Company and leased to Edina Realty. The bonds or other obligations if and when issued will not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance upon any property of the City except the project and such bonds or obligations will not be a charge against the - 5 - 11(8 City's general credit or taxing powers but will be payable from sums to be paid by the Company pursuant to a revenue agreement. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Energy and Economic Development Authority, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, is available for public inspection from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, at the City Hall in Maplewood, Minnesota. At the time and place fixed for the Public Hearing, the City Council of the City of Maplewood will give all persons who appear at the hearing an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal. 14. Health Care Maintenance Account Plan (BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL) By /s/ Lucille Aurelius City Clerk Approved the Health Care Maintenance Account Plan document as submitted for filing with the State Labor Department. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Hearing Date: County Road B and Van Dyke a. Manager Evans presented the staff report, b. Mayor Greavu moved to concur with the Planning Commission and deny a unless a formal application is subm itted, Seconded by Councilmember Maida Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Maida. Nay - Councilmember Wasiluk 2. Building Permits a. Director of Community Development Geoff Olson presented the staff report with the following recommendation: 1. Take no action in regard to exempting types of construction from a permit, on the basis that: a. The city if obligated to enforce the building code without modification. Ailowing an illegal exemption may create liability for the city and defeats the purpose of having a uniform code. 2. Exempting a minimal dollar valuation may allow structural changes to be made, even though minor, that should be in- spected. - 6 - 11 /8 c. Repair and minor remodeling will generally not effect property taxes. d. Permit fees for minor construction are minimal. e. A permit allows us to make sure the contractor is licensed. This is a protection for the homeowner. II. Revise the fee schedule to exempt a permit fee for the first or second layer of shingles, trim and siding, on the basis that the city does not make inspections for this work and, therefore, a fee is not justified. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to refer the report to the H.R.A. before taking any action. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson, Ayes - all. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1_ 7:10 P.M. Rezoning: 1717 -41 Edgerton a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposal to rezone 1717 -1741 Edgerton from BC (Business - Commercial) to R-1 (single dwelling). b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Commissioner Dennis Larson presented the Planning Commission report. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard, e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard, f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Maids introduced the 'following resolution and moved its adoption: 84 - 11 - 170 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business commercial to R -1, residence district (single dwelling) for the following - described property: Lots 1 through 6, Block 8, King's Addition to the City of St. Paul This property is also known as 1717, 1731, 1737 and 1741 Edgerton Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VTT of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on October 15, 1984, The planning commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be approved. - 7 - 11/8 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and convenien- ces of the community, where applicable and the public welfare. 4• The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. I. NEW BUSINESS (Continued) 3. E. Mississippi Watershed Management Organization. a. Director of Public Wroks stated the Watershed Management Organization (WMO) in the southern part of town has been proceeding through the approval process. The State has requested some changes in the original proposal. 1. Change the name to the East Mississippi WMO. 2. Accept the existing boundary of the Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District as the north boundary of the new WMO. 3• Accept the existing boundary of the Cottage Grove Ravine Watershed District as the east boundary of the new WMO. These changes to the original council approved agreement are of little consequence and are therefore recommended for approval. It should also be noted that the city council should designate two individuals to serve as members of the WMO Board. b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 - 11 - 171 RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 1. The new watershed management organization in southern Maplewood be named The East Mississippi Watershed Manage- ment Organization. 2. The existing Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District boundary be accepted as the north boundary of the East Mississippi WMO. 3• The existing Cottage Grove Ravine Watershed District boundary be accepted as the east boundary of the East Mississippi WMO. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) 2. 7:20 P.M. Conditional Use Permit - 1960 Clarence. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Mr. Elwood Lyng for a conditional use permit to expand the - 8 - 11/8 single dwelling use of property located in an area zoned for LBC, Limited Business Commercial, use at 1960 Clarence Street by con- structing a 24 x 26 foot residential garage. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. C. Commissioner Dennis Larson presented the Planning Commission report. d. Mayor Greavu asked if anyone wished to be heard, for or against, the proposal. The following were heard: Mrs. Karen Mastel, 1960 Tde St. wishes the property to remain as LBC. The resident, Elwood Lyng, 1942 Ide St. asked questions: Mrs. Donna Funk, The Gladstone House, expressed her concerns if the property was rezoned. e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. f. Councilmember Maida introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 - 11 - 172 WHEREAS, Elwood Lyng initiated a conditional use permit to expand the nonconforming single- dwelling use at the following- described property: Lots 4, 5 and 6, Block 11, Gladstone Addition, Section 15, Town- ship 29, Range 22 This property is also known as 1960 Clarence Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by Elwood Lyng, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on October 15, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on November 8, 1984. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings -of -fact: 1. The use is not in with the city's comprehensive plan but it is consistent with the purpose and standards of this chapter because construction of the requested garage would not discourage - 9 - 11/8 the conversion of this single - dwelling site to the planned commercial use. 2. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district because the other structures in this zoning district are residential uses. 3• The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detri- mental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. byes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Maids. Nay - Councilmember Wasiluk g. Councilmember Bastian moved to postpone indefinitely the proposal to rezone the properties on.Ide Street Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 3• 7:30 P.M., Variance - 743 North Century a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Raymond Muckala, owner of Tn "N" Out Market for a five -foot canopy setback variance. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. - 10 - 11/8 c. The Community Design Review Board report was presented. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Maida introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 - 11 - 173 WHEREAS, Raymond Muckala applied for a variance for the following- described property: Lots 15, 16 and 17, Block 1, Cahanes Addition This property is also known as 743 N. Century Avenue, Maplewood; WHEREAS, Section 36 -158 (n) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires parking spaces to be located to the side or rear of the principal structure; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to retain the existing parking spaces in front of his store requiring a variance; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on September 10, 1984. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Community Design Review Board on September 25, 1984. The board recommended to the city council that said variance be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on November 8, 1984, to consider this variance. Notice thereof was published and mailed Pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The spirit and intent of the ordinance would be met since view of the pumps by the inside the building would be un- obstructed. 2. A hardship would be created since there is no other convenient place for the store customers to park. Approval is subject to: a. Striping of the parking spaces in front of the In "N" Out Market. - 11 - 11/8 b. Posting a "no parking" sign, painting the curb yellow or any other means acceptable to the city that would prohibit parking on the easterly side of the south half of the building. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. h. Councilmember Maida introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 84 - 11 - 173A WHEREAS, Raymond Muckala applied for a variance for the following- described property: Lots 15, 16 and 17, Block 1, Cahanes Addition This property is also known as 743 N. Century Avenue, Maplewood; WHEREAS, section 36 -158 (a) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires that overhead canopies maintain at least a ten foot setback from public right - of way; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a five foot setback, requiring a variance of five feet; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on September 10, 1984• 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Community Design Review Board on September 25, 1984. The board recommended to the City Council that said variance be approved.. 3• The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on November 8, 1984, to consider this variance. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written state- ments. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. A ten -foot setback would create a hardship of traffic circulation problems between the building and the cars at the pumps. 2. The spirit and intent of the ordinance would be met since the canopy would not look overly close to Century Avenue, due to the adjacent A and W canopy already being that close to the right -of- way. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. - 12 - 11 /8 G. AWARD OF BIDS None. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Reconsideration: PUD Revision - Sterling Glen a. Councilmember Bastian moved to remove the item from the table for Council. F Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. Following discussion, Councilmember Anderson moved to continue with the agenda. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - None. b. Councilmember Wasiluk moved to use permit for the Maple -Green a study and to also issue a mo um Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. c. Councilmember Bastian moved to reconsider the motion. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Dyes - all. d. Councilmember Bastian moved to suspend the Rules of Procedures and discuss the matter at hand. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. e. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolu and moved its adoption 8 - 11 - 174 WHEREAS, Castle Design and Development initiated a revision to the conditional use permit of the table Greens planned unit development at the following- described property: Block one and lots one through 26, Block two, Sterling Glen Addition, Section 25, Township 29, Range 22. Nays - All. the request to revise the conditional Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Council- members Anderson, Bastian and Wasiluk. Nay - Councilmember Maida. - 13 - 11 /$ WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by Castle Design and Development, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Plan- ning Commission on September 17, 1984. The planning commission rec- commended to the City Council that the permit be approved with con- ditions. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on October 8, 1984. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. Said action on approval or denial was tabled. 4. The Maplewood City Council voted to reconsider their action of the previous Council Meeting of October 8, 1984, and the City Council then discussed approval or denial of the revision to the conditional use permit of Maplegreens Planning and Development, taking into consideration all testimony, written statements, reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Com- mission at the previous public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MMLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above described conditional use permit revision be denied on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter, 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. 3. The use as located, designed, maintained and operated is not compatable with the character of the zoning district. The zoning district in this particular area is single family homes. 4. The proposed use of apartment rentals is not compatable with the district. Apartment rentals adduced from testimony and evidence given at the hearing increase the density by way of population, and traffic control. The use would have a direct impact by way of density for the areas present lack of recreational area, parks, and schools. 5, The evidence presented at the hearings indicate that homes and townhouses in the area would depreciate in value. The Anoka City Report submitted by staff was created for purposes of the City of Anoka and not the City of Maplewood. The City of Maplewood's present demographic and population questions are different and separate from the City of Anoka, Evidence was presented by a substantial number of - 14 - 11 /8 property owners that the proposed revision would definately depreciate the surrounding property of property values. Said evidence was not contradicted by any other testimony. 6. The use would be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to the present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, and vibration. The surrounding areas are established single family residential units: a. The area of the proposed revision has a high water table and the surrounding area of Beaver Lake presently has a water drainage problem. According to the testimony given at the public hearings the use would further constitute problems with respect to water run -off. In addition problems with respect to water pollution as to the proposed use would in- crease water run -off and water problems due to the area for proposed parking and increased surfaced areas. 7. Evidence was presented at the public hearings as a desire to pre- serve the openness of the single family residential area. The proposed plan for the revision of the conditional use permit lacks sufficient buffers and greenery to preserve the character of the residential area. The lack of a buffer of greenery and open space adversely affects the surrounding area due to the proposed use which increases density, noises, pollution, glare, water run -off and water pollution. 8. The use would generate increase in vehicular traffic on local streets and shall create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area porperties. Testimony de- rived at hearing indicated an increase of vehicular traffic on resi- dential streets and create unsafe conditions concerning the residen- tial character of the neighborhood. Evidence was presented at the hearings concerning the safety of the residential neighborhood children and their use of the residential streets. Evidence was also presented concerning ingress and egress to and from the proposed use with increased volumes on residential streets. 9. The present use of the subject property is properly serviced by essential public services such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities. 10. Proposed use would create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would be detrimental to the welfare of the city. The proposed use would require increase for utilities specifically water facilities and proper drainage. 11. The use would incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. No testimony was offered with respect to the preservation of the environment preservation of the area. Testimony was offered concerning the high water tables of the area which might have a direct influence on the water run -off from the proposed use and influencing pollution of the site's natural and scenic features. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - ?kyor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Wasiluk. Nay - Councilmember Waida. - 15, - 1118 f. Councilmember Bastian moved that Council initiate a of the land uses in the area of Stillwater. MCKnip% ve consideration to calling a Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 2. Reconsideration: Appendix E a. Mr. Greg Schmidt, Castle Design and Development, spoke on behalf of repealing Appendix E. b. Fire Marshal Al Schadt and Assistant Fire Marshal Jim Embertson, explained the necessity of keeping Appendix E. c. No action taken. d. Councilmember Bastian moved that to adopt the policy that any amendments to the Building Code be studied by H.R.A. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 3. Code Amendment: M -1 District a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Maida introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 575 AN ORDINANCE REVISING AND UPDATING THE 11-1 DISTRICT THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1.: Division 9 is hereby amended as follows (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): DIVISION 9. 11 -1 LIGHT MANUFACTURING DISTRICT Sec. 36 -186. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in the M-1 District provided that, no use which is noxious or hazardous shall be permitted. (a) Any use listed as a permitted use in a BC Business and Commercial District, if the property is not designated for LSC Limited Service Com- mercial or RM Residential Medium density use on the city's comprehensive (b) Wholesale business establishments. (c) (El- Custom shop for making articles or products sold at Fetall on the premises. (d) �e� Plumbing, heating, air conditioning, glazing, painting, paper- -16 - 11/8 hanging, roofing, ventilating and electrical contractors, blacksmith shop, carpentry, soldering &Rd or welding shop. (e) � €� Printer's shop. (f) �g� Seaustepeial Place of amusement, recreation or assembly. (g) �h- Bottling establishment. (h) �i) Manufacturing, assembly or processing of: as- €e1lows. (I) Canvas and canvas products. (II) Clothing and other textile products (III) Electrical equipment, appliances and supplies, aaaaa €aet�lpe aed- aseexbiy- e € aet- iae }xdiagT except heavy electrical machinery. (IV) Food products, except meat, poultry aad or fish. (V) Jewelry, clocks or watches. (VI) Leather products and- ehees- (VII) Medical, dental or drafting equipment, optical goods. (VIII) Musical instruments. (TX) Perfumes, pharmaceutical products, eeapexxdiag -e€ rubber products and synthetic treated fabrics, aet- iaeladixg gabber- ead- synthetie- g�eeeeeixg- (X) Small products from the following previously prepared materials: Cork, feathers, felt, fur, glass, hair, horn, paper, plastics or shells. (XI) Sporting goods. (XII) �Xi4 -Tool, dye and pattern making, aad or similar small machine shops. (XIII) �Xii� Wood products (i) E4� Carpet and rug cleaning. (j) �k� Laundry, dry cleaning or dyeing plant. (k) X14 Laboratory, research, experimental axid or testing. ( (m) (n-) School (n) �9� Warehouse (o) Accessory use on the same lot with and customarily incidental to any of the above permitted uses, including an apartment for security nurnosec - 17 - 11/S (Code 1965, s 909.010; Ord. No. 395, 0 1, 5- 13 -76; Ord. No. 556, § 1. 12- 12 -83) Sec. 36 -187. Conditional uses. (a) The following uses are permitted in an M -1 District subsequent to approval of a conditional use'iDetmit: (1) Used car lot. (2) Yard for the use listed as a sale or distribution of ice, coal, fuel oil ar materials. Junk, salvage or wrecking ya rmitted use in a BC Business Commercial Commercial or comurehensive on the city- s (Q) Any use of the same character as a permitted use in Section 36 -186. (5) Trucking yard o terminal. (b) No building or exterior use, except parking, shall be erected, altered or conducted within two hundred feet of a residential district without a conditional use permit. Sec. 36 -188. Area and design requirements. (a) A complete plot plan showing the buildings and surrounding land areas of the entire project for any M -1 Light Manufacturing District must be submitted to the city council for approval. (b) A complete set of building plans and specifications, and waste disposal and water supply plans must accompany the plot plan. (c) The city council may submit these plans for consideration and recommendation to the planning commission.. (d) Area, design and setback requirements must be such as to establish a Light Tanufacturing District which will best serve the general welfare and benefit of the entire city. (Code 1965, S 909.030) Sec. 36 -189. Side and rear yard setbacks adjacent to residentially -zoned property. The minimum side and rear yard setbacks shall be fifty (50) feet and the minimum front yard setback shall be thirty (30) feet. a These minimum required setbacks shall be increased, not to exceed seventy -five (75) feet, subject to the most restrictive of the following requirements: (1) Building height: The building setbacks shall be increased two (2) feet for each one foot the building exceeds twenty -five (25) feet in height. - 18 - 1118 (2) Exterior wall area: Where an exterior wall faces a residentially zoned property, the wall setback shall be increased five (5) feet for each one thousand (1,000) square feet, or part thereof, in excess of two thousand (2,000) square feet. (Ord1No.529, 9 9, 11- 22 -82) See--36- 199.--- Sead�t�exie� -aae- EThe- €eliewiag -uses- ere -germ} tied- is- a -AI - } -Light -- Akaax €aetxr!ag- D�stpiet aubsequeat- te- aev} ew- aad- epgresei- e €- a- egeeiei- xee- ge�mita -) Sec. �6 -191 36 -190 -- 36 -200. Reserved. Section 2.: This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Maida and Wasiluk. Nay - Councilmember Bastian. I. NEW BUSINESS (Continued) 4. Lake Overflow a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. - 18A - 11/8 b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the follow resolution and moved its adoption: 84 - 11 - 175 WHEREAS, surface waters originating within the cities of Falcon Heights, Little Canada, Maplewood, North St. Paul, Oakdale, Roseville, St. Paul, Vadnais Heights and White Bear Lake (Cities) flow into Beaver, Phalen, Como and McCarron's Lakes (Lakes); and WHEREAS, from time to time overflow waters from the Lakes enter into the metropolitan disposal system, using system (interceptor) capacity otherwise available for sanitary sewage; and WHEREAS, in determining sewage treatment charges, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) includes such overflows when determining the proportion of the total volume of sewage discharged into the metropolitan disposal system allocable to each of the Cities; and WHEREAS, the Cities, Metropolitan Council and TWCC desire to establish an effective and efficient method of managing lake overflows; and WHEREAS, at the urging of the Metropolitan Council, the Mayors' Lake Overflow Task Force was established by the Cities in December 1981, to plan for effective management of the lake overflows; and WHEREAS, the Mayors' Lake Overflow Task Force in turn established the Lake Overflow Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of staff from the Cities, Metropolitan Council and MWCC, to evaluate alternatives for issues associated with the lake overflows; and WHEREAS, the Technical Advisory Committee did evaluate alternatives and developed a program for addressing the overflows from Beaver, Phalen, Como and McCarron's Lakes; and WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood supports the program developed by the Technical Advisory Committee, and desires that the program be implemented in an expeditious, cost - effective manner. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1_. That the City of Maplewood adopts the recommendations of the Technical Advisory Committee dated September 27, 1984. 2. That the City of Maplewood states that it will actively support the implementation of the solution to the lake overflow expressed in the recommendations dated September 27, 1984. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all 5. Reqeust for Waiver of P.A.C. Charges (Ramsey County) a. Manager Evans presented staff report. b. Council took no action. - 19 - 11 /$ c. Councilmember Bastian moved to invite Hal to attend any meetings that concern Ram Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 6. Tax Increment District - Joseph Co. a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. County Commission b. Mrs. Mary Ippel, Briggs and Morgan, explained the allocation of increment tax financing district. c. Mr. Clyde Fish, Grant Realty, also spoke regarding the increment tax financing district and the proposed plan for the development. d. Council established a meeting with Bondings Consultant Mary Tppel to discuss tax increment financing on November 29, 1984, at 7:00 P.M. in the Conference Room. e. Council will meet with the architect to go over plans for the new city hall at 5:00 P.M., November 15, 1984, at City Hall. 7. Resignations: Planning Commission Civil Service Park and Recreation Commission a. Planning Commission: 1. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolutions and moved their adoption: 84 - 11 - 176 WHEREAS, Joseph Pellish has been a member of the Planning Commission of Maplewood, Minnesota, since February 26, 1976, and has served faithfully in that capacity to the present time; and WHEREAS, the planning commission recognizes his experience, leadership, and good judgment; and WHEREAS, he has freely given of his time and energy, without compensation, for the betterment of the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, he has shown sincere dedication to his duties and has consistently contributed his leadership, time and effort for the benefit of the city. NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, and its citizens, that Joseph Pellish is hereby extended our heartfelt gratitude and appreciation for his dedicated service and we wish him continued success in the future. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. b. Civil Service. Ayes - all. 1. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: -20 - 1118 84 -11 -177 WHEREAS, William F. Mikiska has been a member of the Civil Service Com- mission of Maplewood, Minnesota, since September 6, 1979, and has served faithfully in that capacity to the present time; and WHEREAS, the Civil Service Commission recognizes his experience, leadership and good judgment; and WHEREAS, he has freely given of his time and energy, without compensation, for the betterment of the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, he has shown sincere dedication to his duties and has consistently contributed his leadership, time and effort for the benefit of the city. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, and its citizens, that William F. Mikiska is hereby ex- tended out heartfelt gratitude and appreciation for his dedicated service and we wish him continued success in the future. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. c. Park and Recreation Commission: 1. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 84 - 11 - 178 WHEREAS, Dean Sherburne has been a member of the Park and Recreation Commission of Maplewood, Minnesota, since February, 1979, and has served faithfully in that capacity to the present time; and WHEREAS, the Park and Recreation Commission recognizes his experience, leadership and good judgment; and WHEREAS, he has freely given of his time and energy, without compensa- tion, for the betterment of the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, he has shown sincere dedication to his duties and has consistently contributed his leadership, time and effort for the benefit of the city. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, and its citizens, that Dean Sherburne is hereby ex- tended our heartfelt gratitpde and appreciation for his dedicated service and we wish him continued success in the future. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. d. Councilmember Bastian requested the Maplewood Review and Focus to advertise for applicants to fill the vacancies on the various boards and commissions. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all, - 21 - 11/8 $. Natural Heritage Program a. Councilmember Maida moved to remove Item I -8 from the Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. None. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. 1. Elections and Machines a. Councilmember Wasiluk requested the matter of additional voting machines be placed on some future agenda. Precinct 8 has only 2 machines and should have more. b. Staff stated they are researching a new type of voting device.. 2. No Smoking. a. Councilmember Wasiluk requested that the question of "No Smoking" at Council meetings be placed on the Agenda. 3. Commissionerls Party. a. Councilmember Anderson questioned the progress of the proposed party. b. Staff stated it will be held some time in January. Q. Gervais - Keller Lake a. Councilmember Bastian asked what is being constructed in the Gervais- Keller Lake. There are cranes at the site and a platform being built. b. Staff stated the construction is for the sewer interceptor. 5. City Manager a. Item deleted from Agenda. 6, McKnight Water a. Mayor Greavu questioned the progress of McKnight improvements. b. Staff will contact Ramsey County. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATION None M. ADJOURNMENT. 10:25 P.M. City Clerk -22 11/0 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 5:00 P.M., Thursday, December 20, 1984 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 84 - 27 A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 5:00 P.M. B. ROLL CALL. John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present MaryLee Maida, Councilmember Present Michael T. Wasiluk, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. Larpenteur 2. Walter St. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. E . CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Bastian moved, Seconded by Councilmember Maids, Ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda as recommended`. 1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses, Check Register dated 12 -11 -84 through 12 -12 -84 - $466,376.03; Part II - Payroll Check dated 12 -14 -84 - $62,418.21) in the amount of $528,814.24. 2. Budget Transfer Approved budget transfer of $2770 from Account 01- 4320 -54 (Building Maintenance- Utilities) to Account 01- 4410 -54 (Building Maintenance Repair & Maint., Building and Grounds) to cover cost of the emergency repairs to the Public Works Building heating system. 3. 1 -94 and T.H. 120 Signals Resolution No. 84 - 12 - 190 BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit: 12/20 - 1 - To provide new traffic control signals with street lights, signing, coordination and Emergency Vehicle Pre - emption Systems on Trunk Highway No. I -94 North and South Ramps at Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue) and on Trunk Highway No. 120 (Century Avenue at 3M Road (Hastings Avenue) in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and contained in Agreement No. 62399, a copy of which was before the Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers be and hereby are authorized to execute such agreement, and thereby assume for and on behalf of the City all of the contractual obligations contained therein. 4. Purchase of Four Wheel Drive Vehicle a. Approved the purchase of a four wheel drive vehicle to provide police and paramedic service during extreme weather conditions and to provide service to off -road areas. Approve the use of a portion of the money ($13,881.00) in Account 01- 4610 -42. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS None G. AWARD OF BIDS None H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None I. NEW BUSINESS None J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None K. ADMINISTRATIVE PR 1, Larpenteur Avenue (McKnight to Century) a. Councilmember Wasiluk questioned what is happening regarding the speed limits on Larpenteur Avenue between Highway 120 and McKnight Road. He first brought the attention of this problem to Council on January 14, 1984. b. Staff stated Ramsey County had been notified and would do a follow up. 2. Walter Street a. Councilmember Anderson stated that a newspaper article in the Maplewood Review made it sound as if Walter St. was a dead issue. He does not want it to be dropped. 2 - 12/20 3. Battle Creek. a. Councilmember Wasiluk requested a letter of support for 3M be sent to the D.N.R. indicating 3M should not be fined for the "fish kill" that occurred at Battle Creek. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. City Hall. a. Manager Evans stated that additional money is available for the new City Hall. b. Council directed staff to investigate Option B of the City Hall Plans and if necessary, rework the plans so that all departments can be in one building. M. A DJOURNMENT. 5:12 P.M. City Clerk I 3 12/20 • MANUAL CHECKS FOR DECEMBER lgg4 1 q;-4 Ca-TY Jr i 4 W .- r K Tr 261 �'4 3 f 34540611, 3/ 3454,, 4,, 'y ,.1/-3/9-5 34 5 Y6'� ..3/ 9 5 34 5 ",069 :? -3 89?92o?5 STIT: Ti:{; 346M L I 34 6 347,-4- 3 347%169 : ;1/, 3/F5 347voQ r.1 /1 3/ R 5 34 5-m,- I T 3 4 P 3.: T _ T -2 349-51 . 1/ 7.3/x;5 34922- z T "A T F 34 9!> -.3 34y-?4? /95 T Z?4 59,51 L :-' i 59953 * L-C 17 . 41 -795] 9, 5) m ok 1 k ". r Ar T 330 - m PA T T' .177 1 s rf P T T - 1299290 - a S T z 79965 *75 3 24 o *, J, lz r A T - TR- S 89?92o?5 STIT: Ti:{; 74 74 L I 69583. 252 - A I STAT Tir v � 41 M 7 T - T r"L, a 49722 1 4 37 T T - :-4 S 4 )* I T 665. 5 665*56 P 3.: T _ T -2 29e5) g 0 z T "A T F 4 4--o . * m: z UR . < L C :- I A& S L C Ra V S :c :-. )ZI V- V C V L -- C V 11 ,% s � 'r q - r . . I 2 — J K; ■ 4A 1 10 T _ A 1 10 J NT 3,871.55 144. --3 4 19.65 5,o755o57 99 i 1 -1. ?g 15-066,65 90 2 2 2,143 2. 43 105.94 3a, 29 5 X 26.17 145*51 5 33 7 263.=3 2-1c • oil 2D2.57 53, IT 5Q,46 154.75 17. 53 79587979 92 0 - 9 " '. 335.Q '31 5.72 341 •?2 14034• ;0 149?34.53 2 .5 3 2 72 5)5,74 L V: 7 NIJ S 7 T:- YZ T 01. 2 ILI to N 0 'ZZ a 31 N Z) J T ; L 1 .7 1 'Z U' 1 L1 T A' J T 1 L T 1 JT - U L T A' '7 UT! L T T-:- U"r I L T I - J am L 7 1 U'71 L T. S j -, A` L1 1 U TT 4 J r T U T 1!-.;, J T 1 L U L J1 T -' L'.' Ti: J T T L ` T ! j I A. Ir T 7 C ' 7 L - - a U ki 7- f J = M : Y N =- --- ) T ^ - - 5 A F 1.C",_ L"-r! L 2725 r% CTY :PITY :Rr-) C R 7 ,T* -'JI ', T P3L 34 Y /,:3/85 349 M cp 9 1 31 5 lkkttt 34Y 75 1 /;:3/85 34 y -, 5 1 /:'.3/F 5 34 /-.J/F 5 349'. 1 -3 5 349 z, 3 5 3490,; 1 / " 3/45 3 4 9 N (:'3185 3 4 ? !4 /:..3 / R5 34904 .549• J1 5 349':x:: 1/13/ 5 349 J rR 349 ", { - -3 fR 5 349 - . j.1 1 3/35 34? -',3 5 349•: 34y': 1 / 349'. 3/P,5 349•. 3 4 -3 *q5 34 1 1.73:18 5 34 L' ^5 /`,3/65 362 .5 -.1 /7.3/85 5 e 5 -3/S5 J. Ar k 5 2C 35.-. -.1 /-.3/S5 352 15 .;1 3 f IR 5 352.-15 1 3/ 9 50 A 1 10 J NT 3,871.55 144. --3 4 19.65 5,o755o57 99 i 1 -1. ?g 15-066,65 90 2 2 2,143 2. 43 105.94 3a, 29 5 X 26.17 145*51 5 33 7 263.=3 2-1c • oil 2D2.57 53, IT 5Q,46 154.75 17. 53 79587979 92 0 - 9 " '. 335.Q '31 5.72 341 •?2 14034• ;0 149?34.53 2 .5 3 2 72 5)5,74 L V: 7 NIJ S 7 T:- YZ T 01. 2 ILI to N 0 'ZZ a 31 N Z) J T ; L 1 .7 1 'Z U' 1 L1 T A' J T 1 L T 1 JT - U L T A' '7 UT! L T T-:- U"r I L T I - J am L 7 1 U'71 L T. S j -, A` L1 1 U TT 4 J r T U T 1!-.;, J T 1 L U L J1 T -' L'.' Ti: J T T L ` T ! j I A. Ir T 7 C ' 7 L - - a U ki 7- f J = M : Y N =- --- ) T ^ - - 5 A F 1.C",_ L"-r! L 2725 r% CTY :PITY :Rr-) C R 7 ,T* -'JI ', T P3L Y 1 -i .1 194 CITY )F yaDLCWJ�) C�.,K *_- -� E 3 35?K? 2 1/:3/85 145.-.3 K )S IARY ?li J:DJ�' 1 45, " % t I 3:)2M5t .:1 / ^3 /Q5 14.79;,.97 .4 F =D - 4v CWT - ~L 35214>2 r.1 /7. 3/r5 337.5 F - , - _ S�1,'.`��' 3 v 3 - 15#125.2 t 35? 1 Al :1 / "3 5 31 J JTJ 1_ I r.: A. `!SU�.:.'�S ; T1::. "' 3y 1 /73 /I.5 8 -55..:5 M`1 Sr 53141/a= V"M.l= SW'T r.:,L 99?55._5 352'�� 1 1/"'3/85 15. 4 1 4 ST R�T : 2` , -.�� � - n _ c _� 7 _ _.�' �•'►. 9.23 M'" S; 2_T' :z.�� n- F_ 25. — 35? A / .j3/F5 3.59 +.7) M_'VV ST'"_T= 352lit, =.1/ 3/85 9'._1 M T R .S L ^iL 3•7Q1. 352 we .:I/ 3.7�t1.18 �': Sr rR s S/: S /S ���. 35? J.1/ -.3/5 3.95. +7 w•; SF T S S L 7.731.53 352'!75 :.1/3/85 575.57 J_� --�L 676.5 } 352 1 3 95 72.x? 0 �'"S =Y CZ.J=T .+"� a��� ►. 72. 0 353 +69 - - 1/53/8 59522. ? ST T: r 4 Li ='=� 353MoQ ...1 /73/R5 48Q 9-3 M "! 3TCT= TK =3 S L-C ~"L 6.213.x3 • 354375 -3 /R5 042.7 T�'JS.�r D;vL_� =MVT _aS;�a �U't� I 19`4 r:.TY 5544„ ;:1 /.;3/85 $ S54' _.1 /:.'.3 /Q 5 354 9 _.1 / 3!� 5 35.4 4o9 ...1 / =3 5 f 354 -.1 / "3/'_5 37.`:5 �. :1 . 3 5 354`.5: 1/3/55 354•; _1 3/R5 354 ";5 1 /-3 /SS 354 "5. _1/:3/IF 5 35:''5 1 V 3/85 354'.5 '1/ -3/35 354'-:5 "1 3 5 354"i :1/.3 ?5.,;7;, �1 / "3185 .11 .31 95 35+'6 '1 /^3/35 354 *;5'U- '1/:3/85 354 •,47�. : 1 / =3/,85 55 4' !. ;) :..1 /- 354'45. 1 /"3 /R5 354'd5 _ :.1 / -.3/85 354 `:5 .1 /'.3 / 85 354'45 3.1 /: 3/K 5 34';5,. ''1 /.3 /'?5 35:'r� ,. �.1 / 3 /95 354';5'_ 1 /:.3/35 354';5 1 / ^.3185 354`:5. _.1/33/55 355' a _.11''.3/x5 354 N. ;.11/73/95 354 X45 :. : 1 /33/85 354 NJ _ 13185 354';5 ".1 / =.3/ 3 354 #:5 : 1 / 3/E 5 _ 354'�5_ .,1 /-•31h5 354':5; 31 /. OJNT 942., 7 44 16...) 16. :2 * 4.45 2 8F. " 3 4� 745 . 5 35,13 43 . � 235. 37 3 70.45 T. 5 3. -) 13. 1 9242, ?l 5R .9T 31 .37 41 . 47 TT.SQ 23. ?J 4 =.9 Y, C 95. ?3 3!. a J 14. 1 15. 17 62 3I . 39..- 272.25 35 1 033. ) J 19.57 64. -7 2 1 ?.73 71.85 6.58 51.4 45.1 48. ^ 1 15..23 :'K Z ""_ "' 1I_V7J� t N4 3'_L 3 7 :. 'vet 3._L L ' B7LL 3'_. 'yw 3 . -- •'vim} 3-_:. N 3 "_L v .t 3 ' 3 - -- No 3_LL N4 3 "_L '"M 37LL 3 i 'va g ".L -4 B'LL N4 3" _ L "Iq 3: -- •� 3 L A1� 3 r L :vjj 3._L N4 B'LL %W 3 ' ,. ;. Nal B =LL 3"_ L N.1 3 L : -_, tau 97LL T r L .' )': _ T -1 -013.,_ T _L _'"JJ T _ T,L_o -�� ;=L= -J:� T _i.: - q) , l _ T 7 L T T _��3• - T '" L i T= L ='H01 _L� TEL '._ I s ..w R_'',T_� tiW 3 "LL +'- L- D-* -'�� 194 CITY )= MQP4._U))3 B -LL 3 '.4 3"_L T.L.'���.: 0i 114r 3"_ L 354 5 51.54 354 •:5,., ',1 /3/85 13.'5 354'!5:: 1 / -'.3/R 5 51. 4 3 - -- 354'.5, 11D3/ 5 40 .. 3:) 1/'"3/ ;5 29.53 354 "'5 j'1 /:3l� 5 21 .1 3 354'.5.: 71 173/55 15041 , R1v' -. L =9L !rf J :.1/''.3/85 15. w. 35 4 , i5 L -1 /: 318 5 81 0 Q 'D 354':5 1 /'13 f 5 67, 3 5 4- 5 =. '.1 / '',3 / F 5 11 1 5 35 4 .5 1 /„ 3/85 13, 354';5 1 /'.3/ 5 13,75 4,571 * ?T 3:) 5 `1 / 3/ °5 3960,50 3D MSy .:.1 /�Si05 335.i] 355 1/ =3 5 253.x] 4 • 2 P 5r Of of * 3:)S314 - .'1 / f ?5 1.243.:] 355.:,14 — 1/:3�� 5 1,502. 7 3 314 .'1 /r.3 5 5.583.)] 3567 ?6 _ 1 3 / = 35'.2 ] fi •�, , 357.2:: 356717 ,;1 / ;3/35 .12 • "^ 121 "� t 356D +5 .,1 /_ 3/85 9 . .. # Y ' 356' %_ 7.i173/35 1 7 . �D�•��' 356 2 :,1 /�'3/R5 1 77.:x- 356""9 :.1/;305 3,751.: 356Mb9 _;1 /:3!85 355*A69 1/Z3/95 65.77 3 56M�) L..1 /73/05 93 . )7 ..w R_'',T_� tiW 3 "LL +'- L- D-* -'�� era B -LL 3 '.4 3"_L T.L.'���.: Nvi 3"_ L T'L %W 3 - -- i _L:� M 3r T 'J3' =; , R1v' -. L =9L !rf J STST' i 2_�;a l" 0 -1:V ==cS LIC ='R` w. St ". T- 7 7;; V_'S L:C ^�'L = K3L4" 4 3_ T SJ NC WALL 0 # iR . 1 4 - IT SO. H 4 .' - 00 L AA: T3 I aiS;T= 7 ) iT; X SA: '3L M: N *J ST4T: TR. S S J=: J_. - .S L P?L M'NV ST TR =t3 7'1 V = <; LiC ="L sr T= = 4S 9z V : =S L. C —:- L M:NN ;T T S LTC " L • z. :a '3 �C M . r r u.r .l 1a�-4 CITY J; Ma:10 =W j'?? tlRR� � 35w - , - 5 ..1 / "3it.5 356U * t R •t ! f 3511. -'.1/ - 35YM6U 35 9 J 3/S5 * R R * R * 351 "69 1 /: 3I'?5 351 3/ °5 R k k R k * Tt�j U75 J 1 %.' 3/ 5 3t,1 m15 : 1/- RtrtR1 3b1'Zy ..1/r,3/ 5 362 .. , 6 9 1 /_ 3/ S 5 362 469 1 / =13 5 362!71 J =..v :QS' LTC --L 3o2 "7 1 1/".3/S5 71 3 /95 353f...5 C I'' 3 1 9253,22 6 417 n 335 *' A S 4 'r z A V_L TM;,I % :•*:s I u "I s "d D�J : S = �� 4161.52 + �• — J1 :V J F I.`. "1 �_ T'�V�_ T,r„1'• =1 ,. 63. J:1: F��M_ 63.6 # 21 ST T+* =.tz J =..v :QS' LTC --L 3.31 7. ' S- L L 1 5 3 T!�T: t ?_�.S � 15,727.3 R 239197. S x•'32.' D M"�y STAT! T " =35 >'i V_ �S L =�L 23J..: �� 3, 3 74.'1 T • \' � L �.l� _ 1 21 . 49.1 M'1 3 T S a 3 >Jrt SJR T L 1 9253,22 6 417 n 335 *' A S 4 'r z A V_L TM;,I % :•*:s I u "I s "d D�J : S = �� Y J :* M A w .71 C- !- R E =t if '4 D T 3 j 11 v 0 3'-3:. :,1/..3/85 5 05 2 JN � O h l ! . )j 7 :17 L 341 ?2 • 353 35 1 --3 5 16OS1 *5) Cry 1114JI J%: )-J f' T 1 3 5 177. C LT j( 7 j 17 303:1 5 1 3 /R. 29681 2 D CC L 5 '.') 3 7 5 1 3 5 5 � 5 39 1 136, 75 3 3 5 1 /-.:3/Q5 2 F2. 3 4 1 3' U2.. 3-, 3 I Z O A P4 T - 3 L 1 3:) 3 ".3/85 31 .0 MN MJ"J!L j 3 = 3o 3 10 6�,- 1 /-,3 R5 7,921. sr Pom ;T - 3 L 3b 3 kot > `3 f 5 L942 5 2 - C)44 )F T 3c; 3 3 29 3 'A m L.; 7 5 = 9, 4 58. ° 2 2 3-11'� 46 ...1/"' /y 15,77 M'4 ST R rT* R7-17%T -F 7Rzr-%; Z-'J:: 363$ 1/ - 9.23 m, S r :Z---T- I Z `A 7 T 25 3 3 t) 3 �',S 9 1 /''3/a5 8,p R 1.53 M r!:? 7 3 j :; Vr- z L 3 3 m 1 3 5 521 .; M '1 r T A S L-C 3:) 3 P6 9 J 1 /-.3/E5 0 T I A 6 02 3r- 3'1 _ 1 3 q 5 3,595. v- 5 r T3 L 3ib3m7-. -1 / 3/85 3,756 MIJ ST T:t:' 3 S/; 3 L 7.352.55 4 19w 4 C -'Y 3= MA -L_ W *J� • 1 .JiJ �. .J .r +� 363J" - _.1 J.;3/8 5 335* 1 UN'T =) WAY �/Z CJs CT 335 * 363U 5 ,1 3/8'5 1 V 3 _ '"'v "J. DT T< v: _ T - .3 *k 363W25 ...11"3155 15',40 CSC ^ = DT IF ISV =vj= _'WT 3L. 15'.43 3045 _ -1 /;,,3185 99.33 C :S ': J» 9 354'i /.3/65 15.759.41 MTNs, 3T =T: TRc =�3 V7 5 LTC ='*?L f 364*�b9 �. i 1'3�►�5 363.:? M:N`'. ST+ T?. =� ��I d�zS L3C ��L 16.122.41 • 354 ": ..1/''3/85 3.'r T'Ar 3 4 4' 2 No _3 JTiL:T _ lz 364'`:'.: .l / 99,54 'y .S'S JT.L: 304 d °� -11 / 3/85 85.1 JTi! :TZ_ 261. « . 24;x,522. +? PJ40 21. T _ 573.'8 FJ "1) C? ��s;_ ir T T4A:' _ 1342.)7 rJ %17) 43 T0 34 Tom_ L :_-Y 23.191.' =1 55 TJ' .1 L LJW_ A fi5�. ; 3 = JV� �� TAT:. � . .� a Y -a = F � 4 � _ _ 32 ,,3980 7 92 TAT '� ° -Y :'LL T = 1 j 54 ?.?3 =Jy! 96 TJT'_ vJ= r1:SLE 299 *55 ' ^TaL NECESSARY EXPENDITURES SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETJ_ f i ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 1 1984 EXPENDITURES 1984 CITY OF MAPLE WOOD CgRiSTIN7 SUP PL: _S SOUTT =R C , 4RISTTN= CHECK DATE AMDUN"' 0, 14004 J,1 /04/85 65.33 011 4004 01 /7,4/15 991 ,91 SUXPLI:S S °airvi 1 «tRtt* 014091 C1104/85 1 9057.33 1 * 957."' 140.97 Cl /J4/65 35'o. "—I - J14097 J1 /u4 /85 745.''0 395.3 f r-.1 412 5 01/34/85 1 75.3.3 175.:3 114116 L 1 /r-4 /Q5 17'•30 014 12 6 '.:1 /04/85 117.1 5 294.45 914151 01 /04 /85 8 118 R��$ i a! * «•+ 014164 1 / ,j 4185 35. ] 3 35.:j - t 314214 1:1/4/85 53.11 01421 4 Cl /04/85 15.10 0.1 4214 u1 /C'4/85 1.25 ^1421 4 01 / 14 /85 47932 116. • 01421 5 L1 /^4 /R5 72.7~ 014215 J.1 /0,4/85 155.73 22 t 1 114314 01 / ^41.85 1062930 014314 O1 lo4/85 19293. ^D 014314 ?.1 / ?4/85 5 * 683.33 ,tttw :« 014354 01 /04/85 X38.55 t CHECK REGIS♦'R V =VDO ITEM Or-C; IP'ION HEALT'i RES3URCES CPyTRACT PYM HEAL'H RESQURCcS CONTRACT PYM SEXT34 PRI NTI'JS SUPPLIES A -1 3USTN SS MACiZ'j_ TRADE IN A - 1 R US IN SS MACHINE TYDENRIT =r1 CORPORATE RISK MANS CONTRACT FYM DON SKaLM!N FIREAFMS SUMPL?ES 031 SKVLM ='`j F:-l-- SUPPLIES FR :S <Y PETS SU M= r-fHA14 JAMS CANT` - ALLC4AN;CE S9UTTER CgRiSTIN7 SUP PL: _S SOUTT =R C , 4RISTTN= PIS TAGLE SC. UTT - R C4QIST:N= SJR?L:ES SOUTT'R C- 1RISTi WE SUPPL: ES S SPECI ALTIES SUXPLI:S S °airvi S'ZCIALTIE'S SU'P::ES EKBLAD PARDET CONTRACT FYM EKBL %7 MA ?D:.= CONTRACT PYM EK3LA0 3 AI3 7 -_ COUTRcCT PYM CARL3 0V EIUIxMT CONTRACT PYM CHECK REGIST_R V= -W 01 IT-:'Iv DESCRIPT :0% A.C.T.= 'LrCTRO`3:CS CONTRACT FYM C 4c CQCSSI'J S.UPPL1L3 BRAC <7 LNI3 CONTRtO-T PV4 AM_R3 ;4 N ST 03ES S'JPoLIES VEf! 4M= RCI47N STORES 3J VE AM;:r23I XN 3T 3R -� SJPPL:ES VE" AMER'.IAN STOR *_S SUPPLIES VEH F.W. J 03LWll TH SU °PL :E.!' E.y.W33LW3RT' SUPPLIES ST 1994 CITY 3F MAPL =WC 'J) D1 SPATCH PUB LTSH NU ST 0 4JL 0: A T_H PUB L:SH: N'G CHiECK 'N3. LATE N PUB L:SHThS ST 0 AUL .55 3 U3LIS4ING ST PAUL DISPATCH PUPLISHING 7143o5 5 3 '•`� PUBLISHING ST PAJL 3 ^.50 PU3LiSH'_NG 01 43.R0 L 1 /04/95 3,o736.63 3,736.'3 014555 / ^4/`85 513 1 1 Z f .51 n 014 597 01 /x:4/.85 1 5 '-' a 0145Y7 C1 4/85 15 3 �8 R C.1 4 597 ;;1 / ^4 / 85 96 014597 ,..1/04/95 96.24 492.64 0146'7 C.1 /C4 /R5 4.29 01456'17 01/04/85 4129 8 .5S 014657 01/04/85 54.32 01 455 7 „ .:.1 /r"4 /$5 11 * 64 014657 C1 /C4 /Q5 11 .64 014557 .;.1 /4/85 . 1 1 054 014657 01 /04/95 11964 014557 u1 /O4185 11.64 014657 01/ 1.1.64 124.1 6 0.1412J u1/04/R5 150.'J 150.00 « [114725. 01 /04 /85 5,742 952 6 "P42.62 014728 01/L4/85 86.23 CHECK REGIST_R V= -W 01 IT-:'Iv DESCRIPT :0% A.C.T.= 'LrCTRO`3:CS CONTRACT FYM C 4c CQCSSI'J S.UPPL1L3 BRAC <7 LNI3 CONTRtO-T PV4 AM_R3 ;4 N ST 03ES S'JPoLIES VEf! 4M= RCI47N STORES 3J VE AM;:r23I XN 3T 3R -� SJPPL:ES VE" AMER'.IAN STOR *_S SUPPLIES VEH F.W. J 03LWll TH SU °PL :E.!' E.y.W33LW3RT' SUPPLIES ST 3 EUL D1 SPATCH PUB LTSH NU ST 0 4JL 0: A T_H PUB L:SH: N'G ST P10L 0 * SP A7 CH PUB L:SHThS ST 0 AUL 0 3 U3LIS4ING ST PAUL DISPATCH PUPLISHING $,T DAUL C. ISPATCA PUBLISHING ST PAJL D!3 PU3LiSH'_NG EAST_UVO ZICHA;i0 INSTRUCTOR ARCH;TECTJRAL 4LL EXPENSES BIR:)ING SUPPLIES a 19F4 CITY JF MAr LE W00D CM=CK. REG7ST -R U" le K; #I IATE AMOJMT V =4001 ITEM DESCRIP "!ON r SUPPLIES ' SUPPLIES SUPPLIES } UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNl FORM; i SUPPLIES TELEPHONE REPAIR MAINT VEH OFF "Cr SUPPLIES OF F i C E S U*:IP L 1 ES OF= I C_ SUPPLIES OFD IC. S UPPL STS OFF 10E SUPPLI -S OFF IC- SU;:PLI_S R -= UNO SUPPL: ES SUoPL' ES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 014733 ;; 01/014/85 25.3 tJ_E JAr G1AP41CS 014730 01/04/85 20. 0 - J D-E JAr G3APH1CS 014730 01/C4/85 15 *93 DEE JAY GIAPHICS 62 * 3 014.744 .J1 /04/85 1 68.91 GREEN NOR 44 N L 014744 31 /04/85 17.7 GR =CN NOQMeN L 0147 +4, 31104/85 GiE =N VIR44N L 18 5 o 4 !f t * f fr Q1474fi J1 /74/85 16203"P IVA: CORF 162.37 014751 ? 9 75 M.C.I. 7.75 014718 J.1 /r.4 /RS TS. a.C9.1P43l3TcRY t 75 3 014779 ".1 /L 4/85 28 9 .73 ALLA4SON 3USLNES3 014779 J1 /C4/85 673083 ALLAISON 3USIN:.SS 014779 J1 /04 / -5 144 0''0 ALLA4 SON ?JS: NISS 1 ,105983 014790 J1 /C4 / 85 71951 P3OKM =N I yC 01478U ?.1/1 4/85 2091 BOOJKM =N I'kt: U1 418C u1 /94/85 98.94 913(MEy IN% 173.42 01 47 -1 01 /04/8 5 3.r J BOYD DONN! 3.33 * 014782 01/ ^4/85 190 ^4 COU4TRY STORE 19.04 * 014783 01/04/85 1 9 371. - _:5 EL MARK3ETING 1 ,0T1.35 * 0147Q4 J1/14185 39 `3 DIVI3 3AR34RA 3.?3 * 014785 J1 /34/85 - 3033 FINN, GAl MARY f 39' r SUPPLIES ' SUPPLIES SUPPLIES } UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNl FORM; i SUPPLIES TELEPHONE REPAIR MAINT VEH OFF "Cr SUPPLIES OF F i C E S U*:IP L 1 ES OF= I C_ SUPPLIES OFD IC. S UPPL STS OFF 10E SUPPLI -S OFF IC- SU;:PLI_S R -= UNO SUPPL: ES SUoPL' ES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES I 1904 CITY 1F MAPLruO33 CHECK RESISTER CtfECK N3* 'DATE AMOJ _ i N3 OR :TEM DESCRIPTION 014735 D.1 /04/8 5 3. J� GOAR J_AN REFU1sD 3.'3 C'14787 J1 /J4 /85 4.51 HJBEtT MI:HAEL TRAYEL TRAIb:N:G 4.51 * 4 014188 J1/04/85 29374.34 I *!T_ISTAT= DETROIT RE MATNT VEH 2 9 374.34 t 014789 -3 1/34/15 3.�3 KgC BERNADETT= REFJ'V3 3.10 0,1 479^ .11 4/ 3. 33 LINCOWSKI VIOL% R ==UN) 3.DI L114791 J.1 / 4/85 3. MARTI% MAISARET RE` U'JC 3.25 J14792 al/34/85 12.003.30 MIGR! N GERALD REF UVO 014792 12 333.37- MOGR =N GEIALr RE-USJ) 014793 J.1 Jr4/85 56.65 Nn ST 7 %UL PLBG SUPPLIES 56.65 314794 Jl /04 /$5 9i . "7 M Q OSTROM TRAV.L TRAiNItiG .. C1479> J1 /'4/s35 17.30 OKYG =lJ SERVICE SUOPLTES 17.3) ^14795 31/ 4/85 8.8''..'0 POD = IS J34N. gcpAl =. 45 0t 0 : 334797 71 / 4/85 49503 R4MS =Y C0 OHFS TRAW =L TRAINI'iG 4Q5 *00 R14T93 J.1/�4 /sty 4.3JJ.�'� RTC44RD NORDLM R_=UN.D 01479P 0.1/07/R5 4.003.11- RICm%;*3 NORDLU`JO P,EFU'iD 014799 J1/04/95 3.53 Y4 �=NER J MRS RE~ U N0 3.53 J148JU 0.1 lb 4/85 100050 WARNING LIT_S INC SUP PLi:.S \ 014A48 J1 /04/85 43.56 AMr R T30L SUOPLY SUPPLIES �14Q48 r1/ =4/85 199.76 Ay;R .TOOL SUPPLY SUP°L :ES 014A48 j.1/_4/85 -.- 186021 AMER TOOL SU *a! y SUPPLIES 014A48 U1 /04 /R5 91.93 AMER TOOL SU'DLY SUPPLIES 521 .26 1984 CITY JF MAPLEW303 CHECK Nl. DATE rrrr* r 0.1 4A67 01 /� 4185 ITEM DESCRIPTIJN 113.18 7 14 A 69 C.1 /94 /8 5 -01 4A69 d.1 /0.4/ 65 01 4A69 Ci /C4 185 0. 14A 69 G1 /04 /8'5 { 0i 4A 69 � 1 /04 1 014A69 0.1/04/85 01 4A 69 J1 /04 185 +� 014 A 69 C1 /04 /85 CJ 4A69 01 /'4185 ARNALS AUTO S --- RV SUPPLIES { �14A7 2 - 1 /!'4/8 5 VEH MAI NT 21,75 ^14813 1/ ^4/85 { ARNALS 4 UT D STRV VE H MAI NT 17.50 014p45 01 /n4/85 6 92 .1 1 * 27. 49 ART 3' G S0PL =E� 0140 ::1/':.7/95 0140 9 G1 5 P14T JAMES C 1NSPECT3 tr * # *r 014L45 J1 / ^7 1R5 (114L45 01/07/95 497.96 83ARD JP +dAT_3 CJMM UT:L!TI_S X05.::4 U1400 U1 /04/85 014 N3 0 L1 / C - 4 /85 { 01 4N30 w1 / ^4/8 5 014N30 j1/g4/85 0.1 4N3L 0.1/04/95 { 014N30 01/04/85 f 'DUPLICATING COST CMECK 2EGTST =R AvlDJNT V yOD? ITEM DESCRIPTIJN 113.18 APANIE 2 'A :' :-*R SUmPL: S 113.1 8 52903 ARNALS AUT 0 Sri V SUPPLIES 12291? ARNALS AUTI SERV VEi MlA 116.65 AR%A"- S 4UT 0 SER V V --- H M„ NT 52.10 ARNALS AUT S= RV VEH MAiNT 21,75 ARNALS AUTO S --- RV SUPPLIES 149.04 ARNALS A UT SzRV VEH MAI NT 21,75 ARNA;. S AUT I Sc'Q'V VEH MAIN T 138..2 9 ARNALS 4 UT D STRV VE H MAI NT 17.50 AR *!4 AUT3 SEQV V =H MAINT 6 92 .1 1 * 27. 49 ART 3' G S0PL =E� 27.48 * i • 570.5E P14T JAMES C 1NSPECT3 1 9571.53 • ft r, BOAR) OF JATE2 COMM UTILITIEc 497.96 83ARD JP +dAT_3 CJMM UT:L!TI_S X05.::4 47.50 LAKE SAiNIT4TI14 RU?3ISH REMCVi-L 1 37.53 LAKE SA NIT AT:'JV RU93-SH REMOVAL 185. ;0 144a60 LESLIE PACER 'DUPLICATING COST 144950 LE'SLI_ 3 A:>"R DUDLTCATTAG COST.' 289.2a 53.13 NNRT4 ST 2 4UL CITY UTILI =S 1 NiRTi ST DD.UL C IT Y UTILITIES 348946- N ST 3 AUK CITY UTI L:TIE: S 346946 N3RTH ST 'AUL CITY UTILITIES , 450.:7• NIRTi ST '4UL CITY UTILITIES 298.71- N'!RTH ST - AU.. CITY UTILITIES i 196*4 CITY OF MAPLEW0 "3 CHICK RESIST.R CMECK N'• DATr A43UNT V =N'30' ITEM DESCCIFTIQy ( 014N30 J1/ 0 4185 298971 NORT4 ST 11 4UL CITY UTILITIES 1}1413; , �1/C�4/85 .3 453.7 NIRTI ST PAJL CITY UTILITIES 1 •374.Owl 014N5J 01/ ^.4/85 45.60 NJQT4 WEST =RN Br-LL TSLEpHD -NL 014N5U 01/04/85 115. NJRTHWESTERN Br TELEPMON_ 1 61,33 014N90. 01/':4/85 891,87 N• Soo 0 UTI LITlES 0.1 4A8C 1 /0.4/85 9,04 N•S.P• UTILITIES C14Ndp0 +.1/04/85 1 * 144.28 R. S.'1* UTILITIES Cl 41 .'.1 /04/85 2,4D N•S•'• UTILITIES 010480 ?1/04/65 3953 N.S.'• UTILITIES 014Np0 J1 !n4 /RS 2.40 M•S*' • UTi LITIES 01 4180 01/04/85 2.43 N *S. P-0 UTILITIES 014NQ3 .,1/f'4 185 2.43 NoS•31 • UTILITIES 01 4 !Y�30 01 /?4 /�35 2,4C N•S,s, UTILITIES 0141190 ; .1/14/85 2.40 N•S•'. UT I LITIES 01 4N. 81 :;1 /04/85 614.1 R N UTILITIES 014NIQ 41/C4/85 1,R5 -•57 N,S•'• UTILITIES C14P��?v 01/0.4/85 6,222.89 h•S•�. UTILITIES 014 N33 01/C 86.99 N *S•' * UTI L:TIES 014%'F O .,1/ 11 3•Q3 U•S•'• UTILITIES s 014NBD ,:1 /C4/85 86.17 N� •J•'4• UTILITI C14 t: 33 01 /C4 /85 41 , 25 N0IS UTI LI TIE S 01.4.J8Q �1 /_4/85 D 11 •23 ' N•S• . UTILITIES ` 014N 01/04/85 115. 5R N.S*m• UTILITIES 014181 31/:4/$5 93.945 h•S *' UTILITIES 014N8L- 110.4/85 32. N *S. UTILITIES 714N :,1/04/85 81.26 N *S•r'. UTi L:TI:.S 0.14N .11/14/85 27:•33 N•S•:,• UTILITIES 014NRD :,1 /C,4 / 121 .36 NOS* 10 • UTILITIES C14N80 ;:1 /04/85 98.14 N *S *p• UTILITIES 014N R0 x1/04/85 8,E3 NC.S *Pl• UTILITIES C14N8D ►:1/1.4/85 T3,58 N.S.'. UTILIT1E"s � 014 Ntik0 r .,1 /U4/87 • 7 4 N.S•'. UTI LI TIE S 014f:6, 11114/$5 4,25 N *S.'. UTI Li TIES ' Cl 4%. 83 .1 /04 185 7F012 . No S.2. UTILITIES rl4NgC C.1/C4/85 16 *03 N•S•'• UTILITIES 014 NF?J 01 !04 /ES 4.48 N *S•' • UTI LI TIE S C14NPC X1/14/85 4.25 N *S•'• UTILITIES 014 P8J U1 /04/85 167963 N•S * ** UTILITIES 014N80 ;.1/04/85 _ 86, ' 1.S.'• UTILITIES 014Na0 o1 /04!85 51e74 N.S•'. UTILITIES 014180 J1lt'4 /85 242. N *:l .'. UTILITIES '2141%80 J1/04/85 4.25 N *S02, UTILITIES 014N80 01/74/85 6 *16 UTILITIES 01 4N?D 61 /,14/85 92 N•S.;$• UTILITIES 014N"0 J1 /r /V5 _. _ 15916 WoQ • UTI LITIES 014r,RU 00if0.4/85 4.25 N•S•. 0 UTIL:TIES 01 4NRJ .►1 0'04/85 6.1 6 N•$*" • UTI LITIE S 1934 CITY OF MAr-LE WOO) UTILITIES CMECK N39 D AMDJNT 1-1 Wo .0 /04/8 `. 5.Q3 014N8u" v1 /04185 298.71 01 4N6C' �.1 /04/85 A45.45 01 4N Q0 1 /94 /85 450.37 014 N8,- ;;.1 /04/85 157,69 014K 0.1/U4/85 65.93 014NFL 01/04/85 378e64 01 4N8L 31 /04/85 238.96 G14N8C 2.1/34/85 )4.96 01 4NQC j1 /C4 /85 1 , 93. 63 C14NQC ::1 /04/85 34.61 01 4NR0. .j1 /24/85 86.1 3 014N !1/04/85 8.23 014NR0 ;;1 /�4/1?5 166.39 014NSO x 85.35 01 4N�C J 1 /!:.4/85 21 6.43 15 •5 64.1 4 C14050 - 2.11 ^4/3 5 3 7.Q3 140.,5 J1 /04/85 222. 1 01 4 P3 5 1 /34/85 981 .4 5 75 .45 nl4P1 J 01 /04 /F5 50.30 53 .33 • 014P25 jl/04/A5 S•�`O:.JO S• ^0�.3a U1 4P29 01 /?.4/85 11 58 C14aZ9 ;:1 /''4/85 1 • ^83.38 1 93.6 6 014P45 01 /44 /85 74 0.33 74.30 : s,r * s ,e • tG14?►61 X11'14/$5 T5.50 76o53 CHECK RESIST =R q =N»?= . IT DESCRIPT *044 N.S. m. UTILITIES N.S.' . UTI LITIE S N.S. -, . UTILIT N.S.'. UTIL? =S N.S.'. UTILITIES N.S.'. UTI LI TIE S f ti. S.'. UTI L: TI E S ' N. S.P. UTILITIES N.S.'. UTILITIES Nose : 0 0 UT *.S.' UTILITI =S NOS.'. JTILITIES ' N.S. . UTILITIES N.S.a. UTILITIES N.S.' . UTI LI TI= S N �. UTILITIES OLSO4 3 =3= F TR4 UEL ' K IN I',!b { PALEV KIMIALL CO SU'PLIES PALEV K;MRALL C3 SU'PLI;S PARKSIOE FIRE DEPT REsISTR+TICN pc AT MA Rid '_ �K . C ^N TR4CT FYM PENN3YLVAVIA OIL FUEL 0IL F-rNVSYLVA'VIA OIL FJEL OIL P ?TN =Y BOdES C04TRACT PYM PROF- SSI0jA6 P33CESS AMBULf-N:E BILLS i 19!4 CITY 3F MAPLEWGJJ CHECK Nom. DATE 014Ri 9 :3.110.4!8 5 114 ;0.9 211G4/85 014R(49 L,l /04/85 1 314F4C 01 /C4/85 T 4 R4j 01 10.4 / 85 01 4 P49 Cl /L;4/85 114P49 �.1 / �.4 1 S 5 014R49 L1 /4/85 014849 L.l /�-4lb5 01 4R49 1 /041 RS 91 4:z 5%j ''1 /04 18 5 71 4R9^ 01 /C4/85 014 096 21/04/85 014Sj.2 -1 /J.4 135 014SJ.2 ,1 f74/85 U14 'So J2 v1 /`'4/S5 01 4 SJ,2 C1 /(14/ 85 014S.;.5 ;;.1/04/65 0 1 4S05 ;I1 /04/ 014S:5 J1 /04/85 014SL - C.1 /04/85 014SJ'.5 %1/04/85 914 S05 J1 /C4/85 Ell 4SC5 01/L 014SC5 0.1/0 01 4 S0 5 01 /04 / 9 5 014 SO5 01 /04 /85. 01 4SJS 01/04/85 014 SO 5 21 /04 /85 L1 4SJ S _ -.1 /n4/85 Q14S3.5 J1 /04/85 014505 01/04185 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT V =N00? ITEM 3= SCRIPT'0N 3063.73 RAY'S: Y C0JNTV SALT SANC RAMS:Y COJNTY CONTRACT ?Yy P 32709^ R4M3 =Y COJNTY C34TR4CT FYM 3.737,63 11.2.5^ P1 C' 3TRE: T Cs R WRSa CAR W"* Sw 25953 R: C= SIRE" T C4� WASH CAR WAS4 13g.�r 99 RDA) RESCJ= SUPPLI ES 78950 RCID R. =SCiL SU P PLIES 119 ROAD RESCJE SUPPLIES 9?. ^3 R7h7 RISCU_ SUPPLIES 348.41 ROAD RESCJ: SUPPLIES 744.81 13 ?9 R34S RINTINS SUPPL:E3 137.29 16.40 RYCO SJ'PPLY CO SUPPLIES 705- RY�O SU'?LY C O SUDPL'ES : 24.3 { 3.1 5 S &O _CCK &SA= = SUI'PL :ES 14.40 S &D LOCK SSAF- SUPPLIES ` 18. 0 S &^ L ^:K &SAFE SUPPLIES 150 - ?5 S &O LOCK &S A= _ SUDPLi =S 51.3^ 5C S & f 3 FFi CE FFICL SU11 6.24 S 8 T OFF i %v JFF iC Z S UPPL I-S 3.20 S 8 T DFFTiE OFF :CC SUPPLIES 39.40 S & T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 31 . S 8 T 3FFt OF ZC:. S UP PL! cS 31.Q6 S 8 T 3FFICE OFFICE SUFFLIFS 7.16 S 8 T �O=F1CF OFF IC= SUPPL. =S 314.1 6 $ & f OFF / C E OFFICE SUPPLIES 2.40 S & T OFF.' C= OFF ICc. S UPPL I -S 3906 S & T 0 --:E OFFICE. SUPPLIES 13.;.5 S & T O=F? %E OFFICE SUPPLIES 5.60 S & T OFFICE OFFICE SUFPLI 1.73 S & T 0 r FIC-- 3FFZCE SUFPL:._S 13. ?J S & T 3FFIICE OFr=IC= SUPPLIES 25.4E S & T OFFICE OFFICE SUFPLIFS I 19b4 CITY OF MAPtEW 5 0 y y H=CK REGISTER CHECK NO. D DATE A AMDUIT V V =VDO? I ITEM OESC°IPT11N 014 So' 3 31 /C4/85 4 47.94 S S 9. T O OFFI O OFFICE SUPPL'= S a14SL1.5 U U1 /r4/85 2 2.59 S S T 0 0rFT�E J JFFICE SU�PLi.S 014SC5 0 01/04/85 7 71989 S S a T . .3 FFT.CE O OFFICE SUFPLIES C.14S..5 3 31 /.34/85 4 47.94 S S S t O OFFIC_ D DFFTC= SUPPLIES U14S;;5 ; ;;,1/04/85 2 25948 S S & T O OFFICE O OFFICE SUPPLIES 014S05 0 01/04/85 8 85.14 S S 9 T D DFF'CE O OFFICE SUFPLIES SD1.74 : 014S30 u u,l /C,4 /85 1 186.39 S Sr AR #9412 S SUPPLIES 01 4 S 3J 0 01/04/85 9 97,P8 S SEARS # #841.2 S SUFPLIES Q1 4 Z;30. , u 1 /C4 -- 3 57.31 014 S39 3.1/04/85 396.93 S40RT =LLIOT H-N*DP CONTRACT PYM 014539 0.1I04/R5 457.81 SNORT _LL!IT H =NDR CONTRACT PYM 854.74 * 014545 011C4/g5 573."2 SOLT)IFICATION INC SUPPLIES 573.32 « C14S55 u1 /04/85 71023 S''7:1A LTY RAJ: 1 .1 SUPPLTES 014555 ' /G4 /S5 981Cj w SrECt ALT RA.7Id SUFPLIES ' 014555 01/4/85 1 32 SPECIALTY RADIO SUPPLIES 1, 4.14S58 `•1 /64/85 27.20 ST PI JL CITY OF NOV P.4DI O MAT *T 014 S5 8 01 /C, 4 /85 25.13 ST 2 W CITY CF SJ'PLI ES VE4 014558 t,1 /C.4 /t 26.'''1 ST PAUL CITY OF SUPPLIES VEH 01.455 j1/C4/5 26..^ ST 2 1UL CITY ^� SUFPLIES VEH 014S56 01/0.4/85 26.�"J ST PAUL CITY OF SUPPLTES VEH 014S56 0.1 /L 4/ 85 25.00 ST PAUL CITY DF SUPPLIES VEH 014S58 01/04/135 26030 ST PAUL CITY OF SUPPLIES VEr U14S58 01/'24/85 26.7.0 ST PAUL CITY OF SUPPLIES VEH C14S58 C.1 /D4/85 25.0'1 ST PAJL CITY OF SUPPLTES VEH 01 4558 V1 /.' -.4/ 85 260 %. ^ ST PAUL CITY OF SUPPLIES VEH 014S58 !11 /x:4/85 25 .'`Cl ST PAUL CITY OF SUPPLTES VEH 014S5F 11/04/85 25.33 ST PAUL CITY OF SUPPLIES VEH 014S58 W1/04/85 26 10 ST PAUL CITY OF SUPPLIES VEH 014 S5 8 0�1 /04/85 0 26.^•, ST -V 4 ;UL CITY OF SUPPLIES VE C14S5R �1/r.4/85 457.33 Sf PA "JL CT TT OF NOV RADIO MAI`�T 014558 1/04/8C 563.41. ST PWL CITY CF NOV RADIC PAINT 014S58 01/04/$5 554.40 ST DAUL CITY OP NOW PADIC MxINT 014S59 U1 /n?4/85 69.30 ST :'%UL CITY :OF NOV RAD. d Ma jP:T 1 9982e')8 1934 CITY OF MAPLE W00 D CHECK N0. OATE AM0JIIT 01 4S7 r E 1 /04/85 935 .44 T 938.44 r � 4 .4 85 .7 t� n 4 �.1 / 5 1 34 2 r 6 3 ! L14SQE U1/ ^4/85 01 4S90 ;:1 /�4�a5 23..87 014$9U 19.35 ►.1 /''4/85 53.99 97.21 • C14T29 ,1 /D 418: 71.23 7%23 ; 014T42 C1 /C7/&5 3339 0 G14T42 /07/85 139165.''7 014T42 f 1!07/85 367.:0 714 T42 ►:1 107 /35 �14T4Z 6T. ?�. J = 1/_.7/85 35% 14T42 -1/ ^7/85 577.57 014T42 01 /cr /b5 23 2n 1114T42 L1107/85 183.x] 1c; 314742 ::1 /!�7 /$ c 33. J- ^14 T42 J1 1 ^T /85 165 .33 014T42 =.1 /r'.7/8 5 x114 T42 V 7 /77 /85 3_ 7 014 T42 6.583._3 01 /C7 /85 �1 167.00 14T42 �1 /rT /85 53.00 f 22!101.50 : 14 6U 1/0 /85 X46 `' T60 a 4/ 85 C T6ii X1.1 /85 1 4 bU /J4 85 ! 114T80 0.1fC-4 1 E5 350.10 353.0] : ^14 T93 lit /04 P35 43975 CHECK iEo: ST: R Y =y00R ITEM DESCRI PTIOk STAN)ARD 32G ALIG NOV RAOI MA IN'T ST: >r OTT STE= y TT ., CAN ALL r.-CE t SUorRAM =RICA FUEL OIL SUPER AMEo' C A FUEL OIL SUP= 2A4Eo' :A FUEL CIL T.A.SCMIFSKY SONS SU "LTES TELE -T'R MINAL S T ELE. T: RM _ NA L ; T -LE- TER MT.1 NALc T;L:- TERM! _'NA_S TELE- "'- M' NAL S TELE. T; yALj T= L_- T:IMTr4ALS T:L=- TERM *INALS TALE T RMTNALS T_L - 7 _ZM1VALS TELE•TERM; NALS TEL_- T= RM'NALS TELE - T: RMI NALS TOLL = sUPP TOLL Y_ "N3 SUMP TOLL _ LD 6 SUPP TOLL � W LD: N6 SU» C ?Y TRACT -Y 44 CON TRACT rym CONTRACT FY to CONTRACT FYM C14TR4CT PY4 CONTRACT =YM "04 TRACT PYM C ONTR A:T PYM CONTRACT PYM CONTR LOT PYM C14 TR4CT PYM CON.TR aCT PYM C'04TRACT PYM CONTRACT PYM PPL: SU S SU L' - S SUPPLIES T RUCK JTT ES MF:; SUPPLIES TWIN CITY FI L T =R FILTER C LEAN: =0 r 1994 CITY JF MAPILE WJ00 HEW' K h0. OA TE VE4D0? ITEM J.SCRiPTi3 ". 43.75 + ')14U5U 01 /04/85 C14 U50 01/04/85 'Al 4 U5 G 01/04/85 Q1 4 U 5:J 01 /04/ 014U5u Cl /04/85 C14U5J 0 /a4 /85 01405 U C' I /^4 /R5 r.'14U5U C1 /C.4 /85 914 U5 0 0.1/04/85 414U5U i:1 /04/85 014 050 �01 /04 /85 014050 ;,.11G4/85 014U50 3.1 / ^,4/85 1� U14IFORMS A 4036 ,1/04/85 014086 1 /C4 /RS 014UR6 .;1/ ^4/85 L1 4085 J 1 /04/85 14 u Ro 1 / ^7 /85 UN! OR MS JSL IMI TED U L14V49 21 /04/85 0.14V5G 1 /:J4 /85 UNIV M=7ICAL MED SUPPLIES 01 4W1 3 rJ1 /TAI 85 MFO SUPPLIES 14994 UNIV "RSAL MED: AL MED SUPPLIES 714 W21 A /04 /85 014 W21 C.1 /04/85 014 W21 U 1 /C4 / 8 5 Ci4W21 ry .0.1/ , C.4/85 014W21 01/04f85 014W21 1 /04/85 014 W21 C.1/04/85 714W21 11 / ^4 /45 7.1 4W21 0.1 ♦u4/85 014W21 01/04/85 657.25 { SUPPLIES CMECK RE6 *ST =R AMOUNT VE4D0? ITEM J.SCRiPTi3 ". 43.75 + 34 UN'-'FORMS JNLIvITE3 UNIFJQMC 60.33• UNTF024S JNLTM!T =O UNIFORMS 450 0 UNTF€�RMS UNLIMITED UNIFIRMS 44.96 U4'.F0 RMS JNLIMIT =0 UN :FO ?MS 232.22 U '= Q? MS JNLIM: TE'7 URIFDRMS 112945 UNTFJRMS JNLI '*TT- O UNI FIRMS 89.pr UN'=OR,MS JNLIMIT =O UNIFORMS 69966 UN ?FORMS JNLIMITED UNIFORMS 73.7] UN?=JIMS J4LIMITrD U14IFORMS 2 ?9 0 55 UNTFOPMS JNLIMITED UNIF02MS 194 o15 UN *.FO'RMS J NLI MI TED UNI FOP MS 23.93 u t= 3P 4S J NLl wr T_D UNIFORMS 67965 UN! OR MS JSL IMI TED U 2 7 • UNIV M=7ICAL MED SUPPLIES 14.94 UNIVERSAL NED! AL MFO SUPPLIES 14994 UNIV "RSAL MED: AL MED SUPPLIES 3.44 UNIV_RSAL M=3ICAL MED SUPPLIES .?' UNIVERSAL ME3iCAL MED SJPPLIE= 65.52 129.13 VIKING SAFETY PROD SJPPL :c.S 129.13 * 15* '?3 VIRTJ= PRINTING SUPPLIES 15'9 7 C # 657.25 WA HL & WB-ifL SUPPLIES 657.25 99. 1 WARY -"'RS TRJE V4LU SJF -aL,ES 89 • 048 WAR4r RS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 42916 WARY =RS TRJr VALU SUPPLIES 9 050 WARN =RS TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 2.73 WARNERS T2 Jr V4:LU SUPPLIES 1 8.1 1 WARN_ PS T? UE VALU SUPPLIES 26.33 WARN TRUE VALU SUPPLIES 3400 LiARN"RS TRJE V::LU SUPPLIES 19.34 WARN =R6 TAU_ VALJ SUPPLIES 62.92 WARN-RS TRUE VALJ SUPPLIES 405.92 • 1984 CITY OF MAPLE WOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK N '. DATE _ _AMDJNT y= M30 R ITEM DESCRIPTION 014W5U 01/04/85 36'.'#.I8 WEBER TROSETt! INC SUPPLIES 014W5G i:11Q4 /85 1 ♦10 ?.�J w _RER- T.(RC3 -Ti+ INC SUPPLIES ' ^14 W5 0 11 /04/85 44.5 3- VEB= I- TIR 0 S ET4 I NC SUPPL IES 1 9415.6E 014 W7 0.1/04/85 420.70 WTNFIELD 4ITC4=LL C :!NTRZCT oYM � 314V2 01/04185 223.�n WINFIELD MTTCM_LL CONT PTM b4.30 014 X3� 01 /'?4 /85 25 .5 0 X"ROX DUPLI CAT ING Cl� ST 014X30 0.1/04/85 25.53 XEROX DUPLICATING COST 51,3 41 4210 ^1 /C4/1F5 ZAPPA JOS_PH UNIFORMS 014Z45 31/04/85 179.2? Z :EGLEp T_NC REPATR MA;NT VET! 014Z4j j1/ ^4/85 2 ZI='GLEP I4C REPAIR MAINT VEH 2 •489.54 • tt # # ## 014Z70 x.1/0.4/85 6975 ZJER:H "; J3NV RE'AIR MA:NT YEH 8975 015845 01/04/85 53973 BOAR) OF 44TER COMM UTILITIES 015E45 G1 /Ov /Q5 14.1 6 BOAR) OF r AT =R COMM UTILITIES 015.945 01/04/85 27.50 BOAR) 0C wk.T =R CJMM UTILITIES 015 f345 u.1/0.4f85 5.14 81eR) OF �tA -R C)MM UTILITIES ^15 B45 0.1 /L 4/85 6.48 BOAR) 3F WATER COMM UTILITIES 015845 .1/n4185 12912 93A OF Wrl C3MM UTILITIES 015945 01/04/85 12.12 BOAR) )F WATER CJ UTILITIES 015845 0/04/85 11.56 811RD OF 4ATr-i C0MM UTILITIES 015645 u1/04/85 2957390D BOAR) OF WATER 3MM COVTRACT PYM 2 81'5.R3 # #ttt ## ; i 01 4 - al f 5 u1)T.�f85 1 8.3 1 6 C __ _ 1r%TS 91YER CK _TS SUPPLIES SUDPL .ES ,p 8 D1 /f'4� 15 POY� TRUCK PAR S SUPPLIES .2A $. 5 1984 CITY IF MAD . rWO -'3] R_�A:� CMECK NV. DATE COLLINS E_ECTRiC 01 5C3C C1 /D4/85 17 015 C3 ]1 /J4 /85 21 .49 ttt :tom 3,54 # 015035 -11/04/85 1 8215.13 1 21 6. D +� 015C38 U1 /04/85 49.30 015038 J1 /G4fs35 4000 Y 98. S 315C55 C.1 /04/85 1 89.16 1 89.1 6 015C56 -1 /''4/85 249939 015056 x1/"4/85 3947 ' r 5 056 24/9'5 93. "R 3,751. �9 315C57 0,1/24/85 i 5� 5 _ ^ 83 . D. 21 5 ^11 5 1 66 ?0 3. l tt #!r# # C15D4U 0,1/04/85 522.35 u 1 51)4' , U 1/ '` 4/ P 5 1 6 5.3 ] 015 D4 U 01 /34/l 5 4%J 0 727.36 015 06 0, Cl /04/85 4.5C 4.53 t #tttt# 015D70. 0.1/04/85 101.50 i D1.53 t 015E25 0.1104/95 84.85 CHICK REGISTER Y= 43 OR ITEM DESCRIPTION CP NA 91 OL SU CARD -144 ?IOLC31CAL SUPPLIES CARE AItT'4%L CINT30L ANIMAL CONTROL CLEA4 STED RJGS R UGS CLrANIPIG CL'AV ST:.a RUGS RUGS CLEANING COPY DUPLI'ATI'YG DUPLICATING C *STS COLLINS E_:CTR:r R_�A:� COLL:VS E_ =CTK :O REPAIR COLLINS E_ECTRiC Rr:oA *R C ?LLINS Kc:NNETH SUBSCRIPTION At_ AT SU . 'r : DA _ r T I ti P E CT OR DEBT OF PJBL IC SFTY CONTRACT PYM Or�'T OF PJBi l^ SFTY CONTRACT PYM D OF OJBLIC SFTY SUPPLIES 004 =2TY K%M.ZEN OFFICE SUPPLIES D0N aUNS SUPPLIES S E K QJ= lL OFF ICE SUPPLS. z i r i1 191*4 CITY ri OF MAPL_WOOD CHECK REGIST -ER 6 tECK NO. DATE A :.0UNT VENOO? ITEM DESCRIPTION 94 *R 5 +► u15FG'5 !U 23.45 FAUST )AN TR4 YES TRAI %: 4G 23 015G4U 71/04/85 343.11 GL00ll! C^ SUMPL!ES 3.15 G4J, u.l /14/85 235.60 GOODI N CO SUPPLIES # 573. 1 215G44 C1 /C 4/85 253.26 GEti =K AL TIR= S .RV VEN M�,INT 25.2 6 * 00 15 G45 01/r-'4/85 121 .34 GO0Jf E4'R t IRE CO SUPPLIES 121.34 « I 015G47 :1/;:4/85 T9'?. ^0 GEORGE'S BDnY cNpP { REPAIR MA'rNT 1 { C15 G5 7 O PC /85 5329 GRAC= DUA4 E C 1 C34SULTI N I INSO T 532.50 015 G58 0.11 ^4/-85 5.:,4 GREW J4'VET SUPPLIES FROG 3.15G58 %j,l /74/85 1.94 GK_d JAVET SUPPLIES RR; G ' 01 5 G5 S .,.1 / C4 /85 11 . i GREW J4'4 ET UNIFORMS i 015G5R U1/ _'4/85 .2.23 GREW J411ET oO;TAGE 20.15 ! ! 015G6C. 01/04/85 33.34 GRU9:RS W0J TANK SUPPLIES � 334'%4 G1 5 H16 1 /04 /85 924.96 HARM)4 GLASS SUPPLIES 9?,96 •: *ter ! 01SI26 � 1/04/85 126.54 I NNE iL,INE SUPPLIES 126.5.4 t 'e 01513J, 91/04/85 32e.30 I N0 'E NJ.04TN622 CONTRACT PYM i 1 1 i 19!4 CITY 3E' MAPLEWU:)D CHECK TESTS�=R CHECK tJa. DA AM3UNT V END G? T-- E M 0ESCRI?T'ON 323. 315 J35 01 /U4./85 19.39 JTM IIATICH SA_cS SUPPLIES 19..39 0.15 J45 .1 /04/85 9. R3 JILL( SUPPLIES 9 . ? 3 +► al 5 Ki 1 31 /C4 / 85 11 0 R. K -MA-R T SUPPLIES � 11.16 • 015 K55 ;0,1 /C.4/85 3. R8 KNOX LUMB =R SUPPLIES 015K55 Cl /04/85 205. ^- KNOK LUM9 =R SUPPLIES U15K55 0.1/34/K5 128.31 KNOX LUMB=R SUPPL?~'S 015 K5 5 C1 /C.4/85 64.67 KNOK LUMB'R SUPPLIES 0.15K55 01 /C4 /85 109024 KN3X LUM8 SUPPLIES 512.18 � G1509 ��.1/ ^4�R5 20:,.^^ LAKE SANITATION RUBBISH RtMOV:,L n 230._ 015L21 C1 /34/85 37.56 LAKELAND =113 SUPPLIES 015L21 r11/34/P5 51.63 LAK L4V-D FORD SUPPLIES .015L21 01/04/85 5 ".32 LAKELAND =3R) SUPPLIES 0,1 5L21 ul / ^4185 38,F4 LAKE-AND =Oil) SUPPLIES 178 *02 f315L28 L1 /n4 /95 35.00 L ANG RICHARD MINE. ALLCWANCE 35. ?0 015Lr0. 11/u.4/85 1.334.34 LIGI3% DATA PROCESS Nly 015LIG 31 /C4/85 R06.62 LUIS DATA PROCESSING 29640.66 C151�14 D1 /n4 /p5 414 MAPL - REVI =i PU8L.SI'_ %G �J15N14 J,1 /3,4185 89952 MA PL =WD3D RE V1 EN PU3LI'SMINS 015 M14 01 / ^4/85 44.34 MbZi_,O3C` REVIEW pU91ISHiNG t . 1984 CITY 9F MAPLEMJOJ CHICK REGIST.R CHECK NJ. DATE A43JNT VrN00I t IT:N D 174.61 015M15 3.1/(14185 1]•53 M L =+iDOD 2 UG R ►� AIR 1 ]. 5� +► _ � 015 M48 C11C4 /RS 1 •421.21 M_TRO UNSD' SEhVICE _L "CTRICAL 1% p 1 9 421 .28 * " t t Ar 015M55 015M55 ?1/]4/85 ;:1/74/85 64 j M't�lV MI +NI VG CJ a SU PLIE b4.R] 12.50 MINV MTNIN3 Cn SUPPLIES 789287.'1 FU40 31 TOTAL GEN =RAL 1 91 15 .5 R 69 7 42* 2 FUV D 03 TOTAL HYDPANT CHAR ,-- �. FU 40 13 TOT - L ...I.r. 29673o33 1 3^ 22.,. FU4 3 39 T Q' ! L 84-4 MC] L LL 4 RD Z _ 854 FJV] 4 TOTAL 79 -1) 0-) 15953907 J FUV O 6 TOTAL 81.12 H;LLOW .IY A; FUV7 9w TOTAL SANITARY SEWEP F:. t. 9.5g4.T5 FUV3 92 TOTAL QAVULL 8EN =FIT F FJVO 96 TOTAL V =H:�LE 8 EQUIP � .,. 1 2n.191.61 TG T! L r� INDICATES � ITEMS FINANCED BY RECREATIONAL �rF r �, .r. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 1985 EXPENDITURES CHECK REGISTER N:) c? 1T =M DZSCRIFT:0N MU Cil EFS OF SUBSCRIPTION MUNICIPAL MCMR- : ADVAA CED ' % 3EO V F An E? rRC NTAL 144 MJNIC1 MEMBL;.sHI= M =LS STAR & TR :B'Jh= SUBS"= .TPTlCN iEm 3 SURSC= �ir'TIt7`� MV WUST!_Pd 4T: 3 DJ =S STAT_ 7= MIN`. C= 2TIF IN" A7E ;:.JNOM +Cc PRESS 14 SUBSCriPT.^� EVAN3 RARRY V ALL W*NC i!'TL ASSN OF MEME:.RSR:F Z'VTL CITY MS MT A3S'J M= MB =RSwIP 1 14% aClTv 1 494T ASSrY SUB SIC P.IPTION 1984 CITY )F 4AFLcNJ03 CMEw` K N^* OA TE AMOUNT J1 4J11 U.1 /C7/85 33.33 3C • -J,1 4u2 2 A /07 /85 9.723. i 3 , 9.723.:;3 t Cl 4168 01 /C7185 27. L ^1452u :.1/7/85 13.:3 � *t * *s J1 457C / /F5 16.25 16.2.5 a l48G1 J.1 /n7/85 37.'5 37.'5 t Cl 4 812 .1 1 CT /8 5 5. C� 5 . C'3 0148U3 2.1 /C 71 5 15013 15.D.3 ;�14E13 :11/07185 13.1it 13.18 * 01 4E90 L.1 /07135 225.7:C 225. - j3 * _ J14I85 JJ /C7/85 53.33 53.33 0141 g51 J1 /C7185 36603 014188 ::1 /CT /85 _ __._ 925.13 491.50 • CHECK REGISTER N:) c? 1T =M DZSCRIFT:0N MU Cil EFS OF SUBSCRIPTION MUNICIPAL MCMR- : ADVAA CED ' % 3EO V F An E? rRC NTAL 144 MJNIC1 MEMBL;.sHI= M =LS STAR & TR :B'Jh= SUBS"= .TPTlCN iEm 3 SURSC= �ir'TIt7`� MV WUST!_Pd 4T: 3 DJ =S STAT_ 7= MIN`. C= 2TIF IN" A7E ;:.JNOM +Cc PRESS 14 SUBSCriPT.^� EVAN3 RARRY V ALL W*NC i!'TL ASSN OF MEME:.RSR:F Z'VTL CITY MS MT A3S'J M= MB =RSwIP 1 14% aClTv 1 494T ASSrY SUB SIC P.IPTION s 1984 CITY 3F MAPLE W303 CREC K N'. 00; TE a MDUNT 014M74 :;1 / ^7/85 15.33 15.3D « Cl 4M93 J1107/85 873.93 873.9 014M95 01/7/85 103.!3 +J14MQ5 ul /''7/85 TG.��' 01 4M95 %1 /77!8 5 8J.33 014M95 C41 V7 /85 71 a.13 � Q63.33 0141410 31 /C.7 /8 5 45 0 45.70 014P35 ,.1 /►?,7/85 11. T 11.oT C11 4P50 1 /77/R5 43.33 43.00 « f 014580 2079 203. ^ r , « f 11.9�e.1s 5. ^7 873.93 12.789.35 Ci= CK.REG_ST_R gENOO' IT OESCRIr`ArON MV STR=rT SJOT 4SSN yrhB =RSHIp RlT31 OL A I NC MAA. NT MRPA MEM9 S.' }TE MR PA M'yp= RS++,P MRPA RESISTRAT?0N MIFA PROoRAMs NATL 'VVP44NTL HL T-! MEm9= iSta:° 'bE'RS3VAL .OMDUTIVG MEMBERSHIP DOSTMASTE1 PEI'M:T FEE SUBURB.% CNAM3rR Comm MEME =�3HIP FU40 01 TOTAL GENEQAL CUN0 qC' TOTAL SAN: T4RY SE4=° F'J FUND 96 TOTAL V_HI21LE 8 EDU'P +� TOT %L JIltIl..L.i_.:...ii._ s + r CITY of MAPLEWOOD OAYROLL- CNECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8025 CHECK DATE 12 -28.84 PERIOD ENDING 12- 21.84 PAGE 1 f 2. 3 0002 3 0J.2 ------ 4843696r1 .-20624Z3.1 %..-,.--..EWANS BEHR LOIS AA N g 1224.00001 459401 .r t 1 2 3 4 4 19834 * ; Tt 0010 4 73664474 JINN DAVID .1 1224-w01003 8 ° 001 D 4 T393 0147 JO HNS D* GREGORY R 1224w0Q004 0000 { x ) 'o 1 b S f� to 13 W1 �12 0010 s92 24 i • ' lei 13 0012 - 357340166 CUDE LARRY J 1224mm00006 175.61 t ) i,' 33:12 473523124 4ZI 40 3,213 DOH: KATHLEEN M 1224 -00007 106.22 w !. 16 .e 38 5.77 • .f `. 19 0.3 21 4 69531 3.78 . FA US r QA N I E:. F 1224w 00009. 1 9 134.41 rzo :` 3321 469T43719 NEYEI NANCY E 1224- Ot]01Q 0.OD t x ) �. �,•. 22 0021 1 � i 34.41 * 3 . Z3 24 3 `" 31 -77 D 0.2 03 2 62233616 3904.44446 MAT*r -YS- ALANA K 1224•x0012 469.96 { ) 3: 3f r26 27 11022 476734432 MD EL. ER MARGAR A 1224.00013 Sbl• 17 t ) ! I a 3 w • 1 36R 29 3 7 z. 3322 9 8 * 1 9 4 310 j 41 1 31 0 1 O3 1 2198 4'T 32 A RE 8 L I U LUCI LLE E 122 4w�i0 01 S 811.85 i 1 4 . I 32 33 :. ; All l 40 3. X4 34 ; 4 ,! 10. 33.33 477258389 GREEV PHYLLIS C 1224• ©0016 574.53 t ) 7i 36 C 0933 47662354? KELS� Y C04N IE L 122k- 0001$ 2 33.89 t ) ' 39 3333 4T626981 5 SCHA3T JEANN L 1224�«OOi319 187e25 t ) go, !�, ►. AfNr .�s 1224wilO 40 - 5,;. 42 5L 30 34 474 0f?528 STOTTLE.4Y:R. E3 ITH r i 224op 12.00 t �5t. 45 f� 46 /'" 0041 468461717 COLLI NS KENNETH V 122 4w000 22 56.03 8t . 48 1 -, 6 42 6 3 ,,,�,,,, A R i Ll M �l �i.. ,....,,..�,r,.".�._ S 0 .E 1� d. 3. L.. �. �, ...�...�...F...�.1..�- 2Z .Q��1.? 8~Q.. 40 0041 475323183 NELSJN ROBERT 0 1224 -00024 636o46 .. a 0041 47722?'636. OMAT4! JOY E 1224.ODO25 386x83 __. L. am -- t- 12 2.4- 4 - - - - - ; S lo: 52 33,�i1 461602934 S Vr N3SEI JOANNE M 1224 -00027 513.23 a 15 4 7a } . . 7 CITY OF MAPILEWOOD PAYROLL-CHECKS Ir -GISTEi 'CYCLr- 8325 CHECK DATE 12.o28m84 PERIOD ENDING 12-2lm84 PAGE 2 ? _ ' _ ° T NO F*4PL N! 1�1 _C.4 PL.3 Y r E,....4 4 Mt 0.55 ..620 54 -ft H E C K ­14 MDU N T----.. CLEAR ED 4694417S9 GRAF DAVID M 1224-00056 70205 I 224mOOO65 828*62 30.43 469823466 HEIN! STMEP"EN J 1224mQ005? 803e63 � J343 3 9 2 T S 0 n.0. 9 0042 4 77 4 8136 4 A.R NO.' D 0 4 V I D .`` 1 2 4 - 01 0 2 8 473567791 MEL4,1 DER J1 4 33.42 471412115 ATC4TS)V j3"%j H 1 2 2 4- GJ 0? 9 737*24 NELS 3 Id CAROL 9042 476721577 RANT CK JOHN J 1 2 2 4'4wOJa3D 600.73 R A 11S_KA Z. DALr J042 47149741F B E R G' R ON JosEpm A I 224m0JO31 702-o11 VORWER(1 ROBERT 33.42 472121663 RMHL JOHN C 1224-,00032 714987 YOUNGREN JAMES J042 466639367 B3w4%N RICK A 1224--00033 673*28 -30 4 2 468461930 DAt E K 1 22 4-00 244. 10 3 J 4 2 4 5446 D R E G :. I RICHARD C 1224-00035 83004 lo+z 4?326T937 G q E E'4. NORMAN L I 224-OUO36 666.54 J042 4 68 51 5 .6-_-4i A L W F q VIN R 1 22 4 m G 0 0 3 7 58 1___ 3342 473604916 HERB_r R r MICHAEL J 1224 - 00038 116*17 14 3342 472222231 KDRTUS D�44LD V 1224-00039 523944 3142 471553591 L. A F. R . a042 476401388 LEE ROG W 1224-00041 .676052 0042 474617656 1M:-*EH%NtJR JAMES E 1 224 -00042 790097 0042 47634399,3 MIRELLI' RAYMOND J 1224=-03044 58609 JJ 4 2 468462884 P%;r- L T I E q WILLIAM F 1 2 2 4-wOJ 045 664o72 0042 .471 6 4 1 U I - R.Y_A4 M I C 4 A E. 22.4 - - 00 046 . t e2 U342 4735?345 SKAL44M DONALD W 1224-&00047 170.27 3342 47354!t226 STAF' GREGORY L 1 22 4�00't' J4 8 75909 a4 DJ42 471721204 STEF=;.N .-,S.c OTT.. 2 2 4 0 49 __2 254 9Q._ i J. 5'3'9 2 5 T 1224-00050 723o81 0 0.42 471629204 STOCKT1V DERRELL T 1 2-2 4-w03 0 5 1 696e51 0042 471632052 - - 47 5363333 - H04%4 A V T _12.24=0035_2 ___._5 -s45 f Z _ ae 33.42 WILLr4l4S DUANE J 1224-00053 545.67 U342 474260130 ZA Ppkw JOSEPH A 1224- 00054 74105 0042 15,072.67 3 3.4 3 4F5548434 L-C-K R., R 0 N A 0.55 ..620 54 4 �Q 0 0 0 -7 6 5 3043 4694417S9 GRAF DAVID M 1224-00056 70205 I 224mOOO65 828*62 30.43 469823466 HEIN! STMEP"EN J 1224mQ005? 803e63 � J343 3 9 2 T S 0 n.0. 9 X 4, R I D 00058 ---,--.F L 1, NT .1-2.2 44M - - 9 ANTHONY .`` 3,043 473567791 MEL4,1 DER J1 4 A 1 224-0u"059 55s07 L .12 2 4 39.43 46336r.1918 NELS 3 Id CAROL M 1 22 4.100 060 918*5.1 t ) ,„ 33.43 4?1534316 R A 11S_KA Z. DALr _ E 4-,00061 2 21 7 1224-0)G69 447*64 3J43 47449SI71 VORWER(1 ROBERT E 1224--09062 235*06 3343 469532211 YOUNGREN JAMES G I 224,wC-0063 472*77 00.43 4937403 • OG45 4714011 F8 ...... JA4 E 4 �Q 0 0 0 -7 6 5 30.45 .47?242?27 SCHUT AVRE) C I 224mOOO65 828*62 la 90.46 469401399 CA4A47S ANTHONY 6 1 224 - 130066 78012 0046 477627236 -_FLA W HCR.. L .12 2 4 452*30 �__.. .._ _ . - --- _ -_. --- ____. ___.__ . __ S2 01.4 * 6 3757 I98F3 MAD*ELL RAYMOND M 1224,m13 0 068 45104 . t ) y 3 3 0046 473817130 MARTIN SmAd N M 1224-0)G69 447*64 ---------- ti - -- - A - 1 s , 1 CITY, of MAPt.EN000 lA;Y ROLL•CHCK5 t = GiSTER CYCLU 8025 CHECK DATE 12 -28 -84 PERIOD ENDING 12 -21 -84 PAGE 3 �I 0 4 F P��� A A Mc M M 1224•Q0�38T 4.0!3 X X ) ! . _. 0 s 530a 22 ..; 0353 4 4126839?0 A -7 RAT C Z 00.46 412 365419 NELSON KAREN A 1224 -00070 453.68 t ) A ::. _$�3 1a3 - ... RARINE - JANE 122.4- 161246) 09 E 1 3 e s 00.4 6 4lll 003 22 STA►IVK� r JULIE A 1224 00072 380.55 t ) 6 e 4 nq 7 7 ILL11 £ £.E.CK 0 0 Eft 1 1 0 " 2 L . i s - 0.3.51 471440267 8ARTC MARIE L 1224 -fl0073 240.41 ° • 5 1 47 3 5 6 .9t �_ IIIE �. K E �iM EI - _ 1224�nt1 4 11 10 1 t 2: 10 U051 51.4483174 WEGW RT4 JUDITH A 1224 - .00075 358.47 t j 1.31 14s. r 11 i 12 i51 i i E;r y 13 j17 r 0352 4963OS314 CASS WILLIAM C 1224. 0076 658.56 1 0052 4?1526ZS4- EI S R S a ou L L 12 m _Q0 OlZ ._.2 -41 a 2 8 i r. 1° 03,52 502.544337 HEL_Y RONALD J 1224 -00078 626.33 " 0052 471501241 KANE MICRAEL R 1224 -fl4079 426.88 B .2s� .33.52 . §683 4.7.3............9LA.O.a�•:I.t 4T�►6]1431 LUTZ �.N.: .T ., DAVID ._.F P .2.2.4 - W-28_0 - $1�..1 fl 1224 -00081 484.46 t f +� r 0052 471507547 MEYER GERALD w 1224 -00082 459962 - - ---------- 0052 4 7.4. 2-45 30 0.S..Y4.�_ _ _ 46315675.5 PRf.Tr 4ER E R . K JOS:.PH 0 9 12 2 8 1224aeOU084 877,19 t ) t 22 r 1 2A 3.052 472241454 REIII�RT. E3WA A 1224- 00085 633.64 t 1 3, .3 4 f 9 3.0-U -4 .......T LY LI- N- sA R H AELR p 1 ..aZ ?14 G -386. .6.4.1".1_ 0 4 41553 7717 P P��� A A Mc M M 1224•Q0�38T 4.0!3 X X ) ! . _. 0 _ s 530a 22 ..; 0353 4 4126839?0 A AHL•JR. R RAT C C 1224 -00088 810.51 72. 4-81 3 13 E E s G G 122 - 3089 67. 1 4 40 .. 1153 1 161246) 09 E EISSl,ER W WALT M M 1224 t1D09i1 604 00,53 - - 501464671. G GESSLw J JAMES T T 1224 -ODfl91 797w t t ) y yJ'� nq 7 7 ILL11 £ £.E.CK 0 0 Eft 1 1 0 " 2 L . � . a .,, 33,53 412662522 PR IE3E WILLIAM 1 224 -00093 484.14 38 +3 E, 1 1 6 13.53 3 37 a 6, g : 38 00.54 473653775 LO FGI EN J0*N R. 1224 •;30094 387092 .�° 00.5 4 ,�.,: 41 38 7.92 42 6 2 613.. ... . ' -aG.E R..................... 1...... 2., 2. 4- .aD.II.Sq-3 - 5. 43 0058 477632582 EDS4N DAVID B 1224-m-00 586932 t ) ,.: 44 0053 4'T3 541 590 MULw? E G� QR G Iii 1224 -Q009T 487.20 43 nns 8 4 1 n t41 L 0=' As! r n ii AAD._ 4 12 2 -0 n n 9 8 S 41. Yi�ili+iYYnW W .Mr -- .�_ .. _ - �.. �r��.... _._ - _•Yr�f •. r 0058 4613361720 NUTESON LAVERNE S 1.224m00099 466.40 t 1 30.58 411365993 ONEV G RALD C 1224 -00100 580.95 3 DS 8 39189.79 4 ,.4 13 4762 4 ? 6 Q� .. m �1.11 � .c1 i� . 1 22 4w t1.1.0. S fl Z 00.59 475531300 MULV44EY DENNIS M 1224 - 0010 690.46 0052 -Q -2 1714 Yi�ili+iYYnW W .Mr -- .�_ .. _ - �.. �r��.... _._ - _•Yr�f •. r 0058 4613361720 NUTESON LAVERNE S 1.224m00099 466.40 t 1 30.58 411365993 ONEV G RALD C 1224 -00100 580.95 3 DS 8 39189.79 4 ,.4 13 4762 4 ? 6 Q� .. m �1.11 � .c1 i� . 1 22 4w t1.1.0. S fl Z 00.59 475531300 MULV44EY DENNIS M 1224 - 0010 690.46 0052 -Q -2 1714 CITY OF M4 PLEWOOD 3 AMROLL• CNECKS I EGI STER CYCLE 8025 CHECK DATE 12.28.84 PERIOD ENDING 1221.84 PAGE 4 40 r'� EM*0 OPL2113E.-VAME CHECK CLEARED 110 ANOUNI Z :.. 2 ' 3 • - • L "� - y. E Y - r ' ra. LO U_._�.r.r.r..�� i4� Al i .I 2 j[�] /L� 0 3 6 4 r3 3361 .S. 468341993 KRUMM_L BARBARA A 1224 -00104 157.07 t ) e s 93S1 473260389 40E61RD ROBERT D 1224 -CJ1G5 19009.26 t ) d 3,361 468582618 STA PAULI 1224 -G0 ,,, AR s e 0361 1 X926.12 9 to 0032 46 ?821939 8EE8: JOHN J 1224 - 00107 149.85 t ) 13 1 0062 474 92 8762 RR ERA JAY A 1 224.00108 0.00 t X ) , 12 , _6 3 3. 2 7 9 4 714 4 •_ 1 A l� R K ,* _M Y L E S r.. 1 2 R 2• -- 43 Q 1 _Q9 4 Z - a _8 5 ,f 13 30.52 474638182. GERM4IN DAVID A 1224 -00110 0.0 0 t X ) �� 14 3,3.62 4.7233611 GU$Ir13A: ME Y Y L I J 1224.00111 841 52 t s . Woldftwft." 0 0 6 2 5 1 25441 21 t EL. R +�I.A 0 8 12 2 -!�• _ .41 62 9-. a 26 .; 16 0062 469584747 "OPKINS THOMAS C 1224 -00113 0.00 t X 17 33.62 469144593 tI0 S�4XV. JAMES E 1224- 00'114 0.0? t X ) '8 0 052 4 T 3_9 . 69 . 79 4 jU- NT.E.. !Q 1 224 - 9 0 r Ip 37462 47174 -9313 LIBHARDT THO MAS .00.01 Q 1224- 0(7116 0.000 t T X 2-0 0052 473503915 LI ND01= = DENNIS P 1224- 001 55303 t ) it 00. R 47 3565546 M 4 03 . M 4R�K_ A 1 _22�.- .0.4�.� 22 0052 444444444 y_ AL TODD Y 1224- 03119 0000 t X ) ` 00.62 474078128 RASCIKE ALBERT F 1224 -00120 0001 i X ) J . 24 316 4776 4666 4'1D_1 T.,N2_� 1 44 -40121 00 23 p '.. 33.62 475904189 TOWNLE-1 MICHAEL -- --- -- F 1224 -- 0'3122 D.OJ t X ) ;r 26 00,62. 477881931 To NLEX P aTRICK J 1224 -00123 0.00 t X '3 27 16 51k 5 46A.- J Al T ..� - G- - '. 26 00.52 _l 393164391 YUKE1 WNLTE1 A 1224 -00125 53.08 Zo' 30 0062 31 as 32 OOS3 501584242 AALGAARD ROSS A 1224 «00126 0.00 t x ) �43 93 .. .' 00.63 :: 4T3.9�i #T5.: AN�ERSOfi! C R I- $ TINE- N 12 00321 ------- - 11.4 13,63 47i 8231 9J BARTIOLMY JODY M 1224 -00128 0003 t x ) q ° ; 35 0063 472895265 BEAMAiN WAlYNE L 1224- wOD129 0 t X f; a,; 36 30 .63 469 988? 77 BE�SET R 0N4L 122 - 0013 0 00 0.9 3� 0053 273483797 81.i0.CK WTLLIAM . J 1224M00131 0000 t X 0363 469844634 BDEVER R.08ERT J 1224 -- 00132 106000 �� 30.6 3 4723623 5 0 © RAS H D O.NN F 12 2 4 -DU 0 0 40 00.53 473462448 BRYANT ROBERT D 1224 -07134 0003 t X d 3063 474442474 BUNK: RT�MARD H 1224 -00135 0.00 t X ) 3 4.2 00 63 471 93331 ... ...S�A M T.. M 1T H T _..�.. 122 4- 0 3.1.3 43 --- ----- --- - -- ------- --- ----------- 0063 460 5 CA SSE D AY EL IZ ABET)! J 1224.0(11 37 0.0"1 t X 44 13.63 . 47692 4 73 684976 CASS E) tf M A A Y K 122 4 - 00.138 0.03 t x 45 0. 3 4 7 2 93 �) 0 - ? jl.1 9 - ST-_E_TE A .12 4400+3_.1-..9 - 0wou X.._1 i 1 46 0063 469441339 OE 44 RS SANDRA L 1224- 00140 0000 t X ) `' 0 4) 33.63 474829219 0TE3 -L JERRY 0 1224 -00141 0.03 t X - ) {a 0 �3 4f4)31422 DZ�I� Q_ A- NIT..... 1..2?� 001.._4. ,-0.0 - 33.63 _. 4 76721 245 DOUGHTY LINDA R 12244000143 O.QO t X 00.63 476900508 DRAKE BARBAR J 1224 -00144 0009 t X 005 3 46 0.0 0- ..._ F AL.T ;.I� EK .I�.ML.. E 1 4.- _0Q.L4� t _..__._.. 152 33.63 472921337 FIS*rICRl SUSAN M 1224 - 00146 0000 t x ) . is ! 33 33.63 4T3925557 FOWLER MARY K � 1224.00147 0000 t X ) ( ��`I 54 7: { 1 6 srd : 1j5� 40 r'� lv+' IN. IOKI/ IH.' 1ai /��.�.�.�i4`�R,�YiY��.auM''K s te - •� ~ _ w+�,......�.��r. +�ar••v.� .w +...�...M+v. ..r�. - -r ..a._.. v wr -., -.a 0000 ,., � -_._ � v.. ...�� ,.. .. .._ .. .. ... � � -� ... ... -.. ' a s n I � CITY SF MAMEW000 vA , YR OLLs-CH:CKS Z,GLSTEI CYCLE 8025 CHECK DATE 12 - -84 PERIOD ENDING 12.21 -84 PACE .5 Z :.' . 03.63 4TT988735 GALBRAITH CH; IS 1 224- w0�0148 0000 t X ) I3 �. 3 3 r 4 6 Q. 9 - 62 8 .. GA A -E M T; A EL 12 2 4- t1i!_14 9 4 0053 5^2525654 MAMM 0 =4DRA M 122.4.00150 0.00 t X) g ° 0063 415126712 HARP,? JAMES 1224.00151 0000 t x ) , r 1 13 e - ......,.,.....,..,.� 33.63 7 4 5 4 T $1. _1 f a. IXE R L 476566996 MERBER .CA R.Q.L. ..1_22 4. OG 15 2 10.. 011 KAR IN J 1224.00153 0003 1 t x X ° O 63 473938795 "OLLI SWORTH LISA 1224 - X13154 0000 t X to ° 0063 7 1 72,513 Z HUR 470591140 JOHN3 JN JA C K_- 0000 1 .2.2.4 -.0 015 S .Q. JOSEPH- A 1224 -001 56 0000 t x ) :12 13 10 11 00.63 469806100 JOHN30N TERESA L 1224.00157 0000 t X ) s 12 S�.�:.� 1 33.53 - K4At:_ 473,633548 KIrL3A - K ARE N _.1.22..4 - 00.1.5$ 0 03 KART J 1224- 00159 0 t x ) ,F 17 113 JAI . 00±! 3 476743753 KLASSEN SUSAN 1224- 00160 0000 t X f ' � >>a 0063 4�4 Ql._5..........rKQRr.1,S. 465984615 KRU4gEL J A 14 S .-. M 1 .22 4t!! 0a 1.6.1 O .p BECKY J 1224 - 07162 0,00 t x . , 'e 31.63 472484219 LE CLAI MARY L 1224 - 00163 O.OD t x ,o 0 6 3 DO.S 3 4 7 2� 3 4 9 .. - .L.QE E LE-R. 473269324 MAC DOAtAL3 - Al L � -J --122 4m. - 1.6 4 ELA I NE E 1224- •00165 0000 t x _ x I 1 ° 31.63 476923436 MAGIML J03EPH M 1224- 00166 0000 t X :! 1 1 20 21 . . 0063 T37QQT� MA H R 4 73 92690 3 ME SS IN M I_C!lL LE A 1 22..4- �0.1�Z Q .00 KATHLEEN M 1224 -00168 0000 L t _X x ! 000,0. - .4 ) , "I 22 23 00.63 474966150 MIH_LI.'NN CIIVDI L 1224.00169 0000 t X ) 3t`' 24 0'5 .,,, 03.63 al - ..,. 69 133 7 ...�..,..�LISK4.i 474745123 NOESEN a -N.E? .... ......-.A...- 12Z�►r- 0.L7Q.. , ...r....�...go.0 CRISTIN A 1224a O.OQ t x �� zs 26 33463 473565!2 OLSDV ROB =RTA J 1224�00172 0.00. t X :• ..... ..�� 15 �., P �QG E T T� 0000 _ .. .. yrry......... _ r.Y - 000 hA R..0 IE 0000 D. 12 Z.��- ...QQLZ a 1 M . 0 11 :0 -_ .Y++.,w.a�� . 0000 - _ . .. ; . 2 ° 00,63 469841135 PEARSON LESLIE A 12 24 -00174 0000 t X 1 - A ; 29 00.63 472941928 PELTI`ER MICHAEL R 1224- O�J175 0.00 t X ) � 30 42 � 7 6 3 .,., R 4 0 4� �� �� , . .. �, .. , . , Ml :.H A.FL,,...... F 12 2�4 - fl.�1LZ fl ....»...r..'..Q�► ZL�1 I 40 _.. X41} 31 00.63 249 21034 2 LE GE A � TT 1224 - 0177 S QO L3 � 32 :. OQ63 48 DN SHr L'J LEA 24 -�0 0.0o 8 12 1.78 t x 4,;/ . ..'. 000::0. :.. :.. 0000 34219 S T N'� I GE R _ �:. S 4 J- -1 � r .�4 - .. _. - 0.Q )�Q a a, 34 00.63 4776597.67 SPANNSAJEI DAWN M 1224 -09180 000'3 t x ) � �E' 30 00.63 469945370 SPAN4 EVA C 1224 - 00181 0000 t x 36 OOS3 9 4 -4N.Y.B.1l:._ 474545115. SPAN48A�iE2 • KA_T 2 2 4- _DIl.1_ Tr. 0 MARTIN J 1224 - X70183 0.00 t X I 4P, _ ;4` ►I 37 3e 93.63 469965435 S'AMIrgAVER SUSAN L 1224-00184 0000 t x ) 15 >> ; � 6.3 130 - ----- -- . . ...... 3053 - 4 7 _ 1 _7 L_R A y S _ T �t 9 476561116 SJLL[ A t1R :g. J 1 2` 4- :0.0..1. 0- D 3 JULIE 122400186 0003 , t t Y x 1 ) 4 O 1 41 30.3 3 4 71 82 3921 SL UR E K JOA NN M 122 4 -00187 0 t x ) SA 421 0 n6�..,....,.,,_,....4?'_0.6 0063 -? 6 4R LAM" AN- 4 73 9632D 3 WALLME DOUGLAS J J04 T 1.224*w00189 0000 t X ...... �,. )tJ 43 33.63 395324246 WARD ROT G 1224- 00190 278,31 ��.11 .� ------ - -.2 2 W IL L ICI!! �l.r� 1.2_4�•�01�. 1 _..� . i� 0063 1 270.37 •... 4L� f fi i 3.7.54 151443538 GREW JANET M 1224440192 545.36 1ig :70.64 471384624 HORS4E'LL JUDITH A 1224- X00193 258,57 �OL 474 2.1 3 S ALT E Bw ..- .....rC.�tRLSJI N E � 2 21 �- �o o �. 194._. 7; } 01 34 33.64 1 003094 * 41 7; �Id as .714 `- r ti CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PA1YR OLL•CNEC{ S REGISTER CYCLE 8] 25 CHECK DATE 12.28.84 PERIOD ENDING 12.21.84 PAGE 6 3' NO EMP -NO c r c 144mi CHECK ANU Z ( i 3 fl T 1 - 3 8 "A 8 3 C H E.5- 475502485 MISK:LL .JUDY- NANCY M J 1 �2� -U!J 1.9 35 '3:. 1224 - 00196 42.00 4 4 I ts OOT 1 473,543551 OL SO4 GEDFFREY W 1224m03197 844.24 a..� 1 , 2 39: 24 • ° 0 7 2 47?6 2 ?1 . f S E KS T3A N 0 .� L'1 x'18 S ,.�.� 9 1�4 - .O.Q1 � 8 5 ._72 � t >. 1 O 7072 415608535 JOMNS01# RANDALL L 1224 -00199 538.55 ( `' 1 � 1 13 �" 15 30.73 476093677 OSMM MAR JOR IE 1224 -00200 805.24 } t �a 0.0,73 805.29 17 l ei 0074 46 ] 92 23 IR R 4r!_R.ENC 4- 0020.1 _,..._Q�Q ( X ) to 01,74 387523776 WENGE ROBERT J 1224 -00202 560.27 21 ..... .... 0974 560&27 23 24 COUNT 00,20.2 GRAND TOTAL 60,1574.38 25 . O ©+01 y770$8]B8 ANDERSON. NORMAN 6 1224.032 03 1 28.61 za ]]3.1 4836Z13i 8 BASTIAY GARY M 1224 #0D204 279 ;. 27 O.A 01 001.1 4 b 3`2 0 010 9 GR .......r 4 7 2 3 6 913 5 M A I D A _ _.... J M A R Y L E E C T 12?rA. -002 -0 27 2,tA 6 _ _ - 12 2 4.0 0 2 0 6 27905 I ) ..... VOID — REPLACED BY CK #E122400208 , 26 0;29 OD] 1 41105 6134 WASI.: UK MICHAEL T 1224.00 207 150.00 qr 31 00.01 1 ,1110.92 032 33 r... .... 0062 474608182 GERMAIN DAVID A 1224- 00001A 499.8.1 4 .. q ,3s 0001 472369035 MAIDA MARYLEE T 1224 -00208 159.95 ( ) • 44. F 37 GRAND TOTAL 62,065.11 ► 39 40 42 i. 43 ;45 a1 52 0 53 34 53 t56 i t° t u MEMORANDUM To: FROM,: SUBJECT: DATE: City Manager Assistant City Engineer Tousley Addition Utilities Acceptance City Pr oject No 840-8 January 4 , . 1985 b r 1 Qi� 1 ' The u t i l i t i e s for the above -named project have been completed and tested. The developer, Tousley Development Corporation, has requested that the City of Maplewood assume ownership and maintenance responsibilities for these utilities. All conditions of the Developer's Agreement have been satisfactorily completed. It is recommended that the city council adopt the attached resolution accepting the utilities as a part of the distribution systems. i RESOLUTION ACCEPTING UTILITIES FROM DEVELOPER WHEREAS, the city council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore entered into a Contract for Public Improvements for city Project No. 84 -8 described as: Tousley Addition utilities, and WHEREAS, said project has been certified as completed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the project is completed and the utilities are hereby accepted as a part of the distribution systems. MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: ,Budget Adjustment DATE: December 26, 1984 IJ Request Increase the permit revenue account and the expenditure account for consulting inspectors by $9,000. This account is used to pay our consulting inspectors -- electrical, plumbing, heating and building. It.has been overspent, due to heavier than anticipated construction this year. An additional $9,000 is needed to pay our inspectors through the end of the year. Since more inspections mean that more permit fees have been taken in, the $9,000 can be accounted for by increasing estimated revenues by $9,000. Recommendation Increase the permit revenue account (01 -3301) and the consultants' expendi— ture account (4480 -73) by $9,000. jw MEMORANDUM. TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Barry R. Evans, City Manager SUBJECT: Sergeant's Salary " DATE: January 8, 1985 ; Last year you approved a process for pajing Sergeants which established a salary of either $300 more than a patrolman or $300 less than a lieutenant, based on whichever is the greater. It was the intention last year to establish the above principle until such time as it was changed through negotiation. However, the motion apparently covered only My recommendation is that the above principle be established until changed through negotiations. BRE :1 nb 1 MEMORANDUM T0: City Manager FRONT: Associate Planner, Johnson SUBJECT: Zone Change . (BC to R-2) LOCATION 2086 Edgerton Street APPLICANT: C ity of Maplewood OWNER: Ronald S Rygwalksi DATE: November 1984 SUMMARY Request F-/ .Action by rcl - J R c j & c t :.___ ---- -� Downzone this property from BC, business commercial to R -2, double dwelling. Reason for this Request This site is part of the city -wide down - zoning program. The RL, residential lower density land use plan and BC, business commercial zoning designations are incompatible. The proposed change is to give a clear signal as _ to how the city the property to be used. Comments This is predominantly a lower density residential neighborhood The BC zoning on this site should be changed to a residential designation to control any expansion of the existing use. This action would be consistent with the land use plan policy of "maintaining and, where possible, strengthening the character of individual neighborhoods." As a legal nonconforming, use the business use. of the site could not be expanded or changed to a more intensive use without council approval. Downzoning the site would also move toward eventually bringing the property into conformance with another land use plan policy of having dissimilar uses abut along rear lines where possible so that like uses front one another'. Expansion of the single dwellings would continue.to require council approval until one of the dwellings is removed, When downzoning a property, council should grant the property owner a zoning classification that permits the most flexibility for using the site consistent. with the land use plan and the location ;of the site. In this case, this would be the R -2, double dwelling district. The site's frontage on an arterial roadway and proximity to land planned for residential medium density use make this a - suitable site for t he R -2 classification. Single dwellings are a permitted use. i.n the R -2 district. The property owner would prefer to retain the BC zoning but as long as the business use of the property can be continued, he will not object to this proposal. Recommendation Approve the enclosed resolution (page 8), approving a downzoning from BC, business commercial to R -2 double dwelling for 2086 Edgerton Street BACKGROUND 3 Site Description Size: 100 475 feet (above water) or 47,500 square feet Existing User Two single dwellings, a gas station /small engine sales and service business, a residential garage and a .41 x 28 foot metal . storage building. - Surrounding Land Uses North and South: single dwellings East: Oehrline's Lake .West: Edgerton Street. Across the street is a single dwelling History of the Site 1. The oldest zoning map on record is dated 1959. The property is zoned for BC, business commercial use on that map. The gas station has supposedly been in operation since the 1930's,, 2. 10- 16 -79: A building permit was issued for a 16 x 32 foot addition to the east side of the gas station. 3. 3- 31 -81: A building permit was . issued to expand the metal storage building from 16 x 28 feet to 41 x 28 feet. Past Actions 9-12-83: Council rezoned the Maplewood Plumbing site (1690 English Street) from BC to NC, neighborhood commercial. The existing structure could not be further expanded and NC use of the property is compatible with the location. 10- 22 -84: Council rezoned two adjacent properties east of County Road B and McMenemy Street from BC to R -1, single dwelling. The existing office building was found to be incompatible with this location Downzoning to R -1 was chosen to classify the use as nonconforming, requiring council approval for any proposed expansion of the office use, 11 -5 -84: The planning commission recommended downzon ing of the Brooks Superette property ( 2150 McMenemy Street) from BC to NC for the same reasons sited in the 9 -12 -83 above. Planning 10 Land use plan designation: RL, residential lower density. 2. Zoning: Present - -BC, business commercial; Proposed - -R -2, double dwelling. f) 3. Policies from the plan: a. Page 18. -29: The RL land use classification is primarily designated for single dwellings. An occasional double dwelling may be allowed. b. Page 18 -5: Whenever possible, changes in types of land use shall be along rear property lines so that similar uses front on the same street. c. Page 18 -2: Zoning maps should be updated as necessary to make both land use maps and zoning maps compatible. d. Page 18-3: Maintain and where necessary, strengthen the character of individual neighborhoods. 4* Compliance with land use laws: a. Section 36 -4.85 requires four findings for approval of a zone change. Refer to the findings in the resolution on page 10, be Refer to page 9 for a l i s t of the uses permitted in the BC district. c. Section 36 -24 states "no building shall hereafter be placed upon a single lot so that there shall be a dwelling house in the rear of another building with the same frontage, except by special permission by the governing body." d. Section 36 -69 (lot dimension.) states that "Every building designed and erected in an R -1 district for the housing of one family, together with its accessory buildings, shall be located .on a building site of not less than 10,000 square feet in area." e. Section 36 -17 states the requirements that apply to nonconforming uses. In this case, the commercial use of the property and two single dwellings on the same lot would become r legal nonconforming uses. The code requirements are as follows: "(1) Any unlawful use of a building or land existing at the effective date -of any provision of this chapter may be continued although such use does not conform to such provision of this chapter. (2) The substitution of one nonconforming use for another nonconf orming use may-be permitted by the city council by special use permit, as provided in Article III of this chapter; provided that, such nonconforming use is determined by the city council to be of the same or more restrictive nature as the original conconf orming ' use. Whenever a nonconforming use of a building or land has been changed to a use of a more restrictive classification or to a conforming use, such use shall not thereafter be changed to a use of a less restricted classification. 3 (3) A nonconforming building wholly or partially destroyed by fire, explosion, flood or other phenomenon, or legally condemned, may be reconstructed and used for the same nonconforming use; provided that, building reconstruction shall be commenced within one year from the date the building was destroyed or condemned and shall be carried on without interruption. (4) If a nonconforming use of a building or land is voluntarily abandoned and ceases for a continuous period or one year or more, subsequent use of such building or land shall be in conformity with the provisions of this chapter. (5) No existing building or premises devoted to a use not permitted in the district in which such building or premises is located -shall be enlarged, reconstructed or structurally altered, unless: (a Required by law or government order; or (b ) There would not be a significant affect, as determined by the . city through a special use permit, on the development of the parcel as zoned. (6) The city council may permit, through the issuance of a special use permit, as provided in Article, III of this chapter. the extension of a nonconforming use throughout those parts of a building which were manifestly designed or arranged for such use prior to the date when such use of _ such building became nonconforming, if no structural alteration, except those required by law, are made. (7) No nonconforming use shall be extended to displace a conforming use. (8) An accessory building which is caused to be noncon- forming, due to an amendment to the zoning code, may be expanded if the following conditions are met: (a) The building is zoned properly. (b) The building was a conforming structure prior to the effective date of Ordinance No. 488 (June 12, 1980). (c). All presently applicable building code require- ments are met. (d) All portions of said structure are on the applicant's property. (e) Runoff from the overhang of said structure is not adversely affecting an adjacent property. (f) Any proposed - building addition shall be made away from side and rear lot lines. 4 f Citizen Comments Seventeen property owners within 350 feet of this property were asked their opinion of this proposal. Fourteen responses were received; five wanted the business to rema i n at this location, one respondent had no comment and eight support the proposal. Procedures 1. Planning Commission recommendation 2. City council decision following a public hearing Mb Attachments 1. Location map 2. Property line /zoning map 3. Parkside land use plan map 40 `"BC zoning district 5. Resolution v V ` v R F I I ' a+ R BC l• � F • ,\\ R M1 • F R 1 F v R i . R C/T Y OF LITTLE CANADA y R r �• F _ R I F (R F r r . RE vF I 8 —f R I '1 � ` —� � � f �v F 'R •, R 6C R R � `= U ''v �•�° !R2 R KT A AYE r SK{LLWAN AVE t ' LIFf"R AWE Ln DOw E ,� BC F R F f - NS AV � •I a ' Q � �C V;— 0 N R a , R , R AVE AV L •~ surMfR .,,E •! ...f' • F eC BC I • F E H• z F • ---. F , 4 • R r u ¢ F � F � 11 W W N A R Q a ❑ .�' F . R3 r - 3C BC R3 rR I • /R F B L A 11 MISM 1 R 8 C F R C/ TY OF ST. PAUL LOCATION MAP 6 Attachment One Q N r • i!'r ' .' ''IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIillillilillllllll llI O f Q `a� 1 � 1 16 IOU T 4 ) 0 GI 1 _ • ' r. ., o ff- Ao s� r � : S 5 4 FL 16' � 2160 IIIIIIIIIIM Cary ' `9PLE' DD jt-b 9 L Pond L Dwe l l i n g t t 2094 " r� _ NOW h .. ofd. TINE 5 V A :: ti }� • �:ti; •: t!S • .. �:•:..:: . S, 213 r: a Q AS STATION o h 3 0 ��k.. Storage Building 4 A a, �-' 207 5 2074 I _ _ c '. M ^ : ' CAP u St1` Undeveloped Land �--- "' �• `- " � -` `" ' � 3• •�e � r q � p i 15 ► o r� I —�—•— - -- -- mac. -- � (� i c m • All a ► � v1 _ —� W' 114. • . �•t r' �•:`' .mac jl�.�� _ —_� c - • ( k i �►�` ..- I / M ' aft . r %D C) I C . A Z lull 5 0 7,s� 1 � � l •' r`•t y ` t Now ! t ' • 4K J 1 PROPERTY LINE / .ZONING MAP Proposed Zone Change 7 Attachment Two Interchan p 000 interchange ar Off IC *0 41 k1- oun ma UF 0 S J i — on - Fin Ain fco minorh --r ! - e R'f fl� LSC p s Ro elawn-, interchange- major collector 7 -: _ _ s s sew R M _ . - 10 eD 7t .. ........ interchan ma arteri Lar'kfiteur ■ Rh LSC Parkside NEIGHBORHOOD LWdD USE PLAN 8 Attachment. Three 4 0 Sec. 36 -153. Use regulations. In a BC Business and Commercial District in the city, the follou*- ing regulations shall apply: (1) Permitted uses: A building may be erected or used, and a lot may be used or occupied, for any of the following purposes, and no other: (a) Apartment for one family in combination with business use. - (b) Hotel, motel, inurist hOMe, rooming house or boarding- house. (c) Retail store,. restaurant, office, agency, studio, hank, personal service and craftsmen's shop, mortuary. (d) Automobile sales agency that sells new cars or new and used cars, parking garage or lot, provided all facil- ities are located and all services are conducted on the lot. (e) Newspaper publishing, job printing establishment. (f) Theater. (g) Hand or automatic self - service laundry. (h) Bakery or confectionery shop, for the production of ar- ticles to be sold only at retail on the premises. (i) Public garage or motor fuel station; provided that a license to operate such business is first obtained from the city council pursuant to chapter 17 of this Code. All public garages and motor fuel stations must be so lo- cated on the site and the site shall be of the size as pro in section 36 -] 56 of this division which defines kinds of operation, site area required and other data relating to such business. 0) Any use of the same general character as any of the above permitted uses; provided that, no use which. is noxious or hazardous shall be permitted. _ 9 Attachment Four Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of 1984 at 7 p.m. The following -members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business commercial to R -2, residence district (double dwelling) for the following - described property: 22 Lot 12, Thiede's Edgerton Villas, Section 17, Township 29, Range This property is also known as 2086 Edgerton Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on November 19, 1984. The planning commission recommended to the city council that 'said rezoning be . 30 .The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 1984 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact : 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood , and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 30 The proposed change, wi l l serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare, .10 Attachment Five 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Adopted this day of , 19840 Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD } I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota,. do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of 1984 with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this rezoning. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of. , 1984* City Clerk City of Maplewood, 11 B. Rezoning: 2086 Ed r ge ton Secretary Olson said the ro osa 1 i • P P s to downzone this property from 8C s commercial to R - 29 double dwel'l.in . ' business 8 Ronald R � walski said d the property has been commercia since ' been well 1930 s, the property has maintained. He questioned why a license was issued on Sunrise Drive to operate garage, - Hate his P g 8e• The zone change would eliminate s business and the use of the p roperty • son. P P y as a business ness by h Staff rev i ewed ' the regulat 1 a . g tions outlined i n the code for conti nuati o of thi business, n Mr. Rygwa 1 s k i questioned t .i on ed i f . . q the use could be expanded to include a s i n the future, tore Secretary Ol son indicated that • would be expansion of the use and would require approval of the city counci Mr. Rygwalski said he would 1 i ke someth.i ng in writing that he w Able to keep and maintain his 1 be � s bus � ness. . !: � tr ecrea 01 • • t �s discontinued son said the code does give the rig to cont • Winless � .g t Hue the business d for one year, then i t would d revert ba the, toning. k to pie 'T 2 11 -19 -84 7 . Commissioner Pel l i sh moved the Lanni n commission P g recommend the ci ty counc i 1 adopt .the fol resolution: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, bus i nes s 6 commercial to R - 29 residence district dwelling) � for the fo�7 described property: . double folio ng 'tot 12, Th i ede' s Edg erton rton V i 11 g as, Section 17, Township g�. 29, Ran &22 22 phis prope is also ; Y known as 2086 Edgerton Street, Maplewood; = WHEREAS, the procedural history • y of the s rezoning i s as f o ll ows: 1. This rezoning was initiate • initiated by the Ci of Maplewood, ursuant t Chapter 36 article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances, p ° p ces. 2. ,This rezoni was revi ewed wed by the Maplewood Planning Commission ' November 19, 1984. The planning commission ° ' on recommended to the city council that said rezoning be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAP LEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the a bove- described rezoning be approved on h ' f i ndi n s of fact: pp the bas s of the following 8 1. The proposed change is consistent w • of the zoning with the spy r� t, purpose and intent zo ing code 20 The proposed change will not substantially Nally �n�ure or detract from the use of neighboring property r from the • y the of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area • change or plan i s a � nc 1 uded � n the proposed P adequatel safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the ' h best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable cabl a and the ubl i s p welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no ' negative effect upon the logical. of f i.ci ent, and economical extension of u l i p b c ' services and face 1 ities, such as public water, sewers, police and f i re rotes p ti on and schools. Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes—Commissioners Barrett Fi scher, Larson, Pel l ish, Sigmundi k en Slett scher, Nays =- Commissioner Robens r t B y MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Code Amendment -- Setbacks and Lot Dimensions DATE: November 7, 1984 t k r. 43 V v � � i l b *,- C - L .I I - I . i • F. � 1 ♦ i j Da L� Re u est The city council, on September 24, initiated an amendment to allow additions to existing single dwellings in required setbacks without having to approve a variance. It was suggested at a planning commission meeting that l divisions be included as well. Reason for the Request In order to approve a - . variance, state law. requires that council must find an undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individ- ual property. (See background information.) This is a difficult finding to make. Undue hardship means "the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions al lowed by the official controls." A strict interpretation of this law could find that no variance for . a house addition is justified, si the property already has a house and that is a reasonable use of the property. This ordinance allows a lot or building to use the predominate lot area, l ot width or setback, if it 'is less than the code requirement. Th.i s avoids having to make hardship findings through a variance and saves the homeowner and city the cost and time of an application. The code already allows this for front yard setbacks. This ordinance would also allow a lesser 1 of . dimension or house addition into a mi.nimum setback b cond use .permit. . y tonal Staff Recommendation Approval of the enclosed ordinance. HRA Recommendation Approval of the enclosed ordinance. 0 — s BACKGROUND 1. Section 462.357, subd. 6 (2) of state statutes states the following: "To hear requests for variances from the • • 1 �teral provisions of the ordinanc in instances their strict enforcement would undue hardship .because of ci rcumstances uni que to the �nd�v� dual cause property under consideration, and to grant such variances strated that such ces only when � t � s demon - ch actions will be in keeping with the spirit n P t and intent of the ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the ro er • p P ty �n question cannot be Put to a reasonable nable use if used under conditions allowed b controls, the plight y the official • s property not created b p ght of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his the landowner, es ranted will y er, and the variance, if 9 1 not alter the essential character of the locality. cality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardshi if reasonable use for the property exists u p ordinance. y ex under the terms of the Undue hardship also includes, but is not limi ted to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction 116J.06 subdiv lon as .defined �n section vision 2, when in harmony with the ordinance. The of appeals and adjustments or board the governing body as the case may be may not permit as a variance any use that is not ermi P tted under the ordinance for prop in the zone affected person's land is located. The board or governing body as 9 Y the case may be, ' may permit as a variance the temporary _use of a one-family dwelling family dwell n Th boar � ng as a two • .g d o r governing body as the case may be ma impose conditi ons i n the granting of variances y y to p rotect g Dances to insure compliance and p adjacent properties. „ • 2. Section 36- 442(b) of city code states that: "Approv.al of a conditional use permit shall be a based upon the following findings: Y (1) The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. (2) The establishment or maintenance of the use shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. (3) The use shall be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. (4) The use shall not depreciate property values. (5) The use shall not be hazardous detrimental • � ental or disturbing to and potential surrounding land uses due to noises, glare smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water of l uti on water .run -off, vibration p ' w , general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. (6) The use shall generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. r3 (7) The use shall be served by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, uti 1 i ti es, schools and parks. (8) The use shall not create excessive additional re 'uir q ements at public cost for public facilities and services; and shall not be detrimental to the welfare of the city, (9) The use shall preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. (10) The use shall cause minimal adverse environmental effects." jW Attachment, ordinance ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REVISING THE MINIMUM SETBACKS, LOT AREA AND LOT FRONTAGE IN R -1 ZONES THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Sections 36 -69 through 36 -71 are hereby amended as follows (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): Sec. 36 -69. Lot dimensions. Every 604d4Rg- des4gned -and single dwelling erected in an R -1 Res4denEe -Di strict, fer the - housing- ef- ene- fam4ly3- together- w4th -4ts aEEessery- bwi4d4ngs shall be located on a building site of R8t -4ess than at least ten thousand (10,000) square feet in area. The minimum width of the lot shall not be less than sevent y (75) feet a t the -five . bui 1 di ng setback line. No existing l shall be subdivi unless all the resulting lots comply 4n -s4ze with the provisi hereof. {Gede 1966-5-§99479394 Except that, if the majority of the building sites on the same street and within 300 feet of a lot proposed to be built on have an area or width that is than those required in this section, then the proposed lot shall conform to that predominate lot area or width as a mi nimum. Where several lots are used as one building site the l area ha shall be the total of the individual v � dua l 1 ots . The ci council may set the minimum lot area or width, b conditional use ermi t, if there is no predominate lot area or width and the majorit t � y Of lots are less than the minimum set in section. Sec .. 36- 70. Front yards. Each lot in an R -1 Res4denEe Di strct 'shall have a front yard of at least net - -than thirty (30) feet in depth faE4ng- any - street -er read - - -1# f }fty- �58�- perEeet -en -gee Except that, if the ma of the thee- ex4st4Rg dwellings hav4ng- freRtages on the same street er -read and within 300 feet of the l to be built on have a predeFa4Rant - front -yard setback from that street that is different than thirty feet, fret -that spee4f4ed- here4n then all buildings thereafter erected, altered or moved on that street er -read shall conform to that predominate setback freRt yard -depth as a minimum, u m ess a- d setbaEk- }s- appreved- 4m- wr4t�Ag by net -3 ess - than - f }fty - one - 451- perEeRt- ef- a��- ef- tRe- ev�Rers -ef- the -then ex�st�Rg ba��d�Rgs - en - that - street -er- read- w�th�n- three- handred -�398� -feet ef- the- pre pesed- bu4404ng- 4eeat4eR-- �Gede- 1965 §984. -8484 A conditional use permit may be given to construct an addition to a single dwel who lin � g g when such addition., or Dart thereof. extendr, , ntn a mi nimi�m cnthark Sec. ,36 - 71. Side yards. Each lot in an R -1 Res4denEe District shall have two (2) side yards, eRe the be}ld4Rg- - -Fer- every- bw4ld4ng- ereEted- er- straE- tura}4y- a4tered3- eaEh -s4de- yard -shall -have each having a width of Ret -4ess than at least five (5) feet, subject to the following modifications: (1) 8p- a- Eerpe -4et -the The side yard on the street side of sbEh a corner l ot shall have a width of pet - 4ess - than at least thirty (30) feet.. Except that, if the of the dwell in s on the same street and within 300 feet of the lot to be built on have a setback from that street that is different . than thirty feet, *then all buildin s. - erected, altered or moved on that street shall conform to that predominant setback as a minimum. A conditional use ermit may ' P y be given to construct an addition to a single dwel when such addition or art thereof, extends into a minimum setback. (2) A church or a pab }4E;- pareeh4al -er_ r4vate school P shall have a side yard of not less than fifty (50) feet on each side adjoin- ing other property or thi P P y thir feet from .. a public right -of -way. (3) When two (2) or more adjoining lots • � g t are used as a si a bui 1 di ng site, the side yard requirements shall apply only to the outside lot lines. (Code 1965, §904 -050; Ord. No. 487, 904.050 6 -5 -80 Section 2. Section 30 -8 (f) is hereby mended as f (additions Y ollows are underlined and deletions are crossed out): (f) Lots: (1) Single- family generall The minimum lot dimensions i ' n subdivisions designated for single - fami detached dwelling developments shall be: a. Seventy -five (75) feet wide at the established building setback line and on outside street curvatures; b. Not less than sixty (60) feet at the front l line,, except that lots located along the outside curves of curvi- linear streets or on the bulb of culs -de -sac shall be no less than forty (40) feet in width at the front lot line; ,. c. Not less than ten thousand (10,000) square feet in area; and d. Not less than seven thousand five hundred (7,500) square feet i n area i f d q • designated as Rm. Medium Density Residential on the city land use plan. 1. e. If the majority of the buildinq sites on the same street and within 300 feet of a lot proposed to be built on have an area or width that is less than those required-in this section, then .the proposed lot shall conform to that predominate lot area or width as a minimum. Where several lots are used as one build • ing site, the lot area shall be the total of the individual lots. The 0 t y council may set the minimum l area or width, b Y conditional use permit, if there is no p redominate lot area or width and the ma jori t of lots are less than the minimum set in this sectio - Section 3. This ordina . uct nce shall take effect upon its passage publication. P ge and Passed by the Maplewood • P d C1ty Council on 198.0 Attest: Clerk Mayo r Ayes- - Nays =- L • E. Code Amendment -- Setbacks and Lot Dimensions , .. //- /9 Secretary Olson said this proposal was initiated b th _ y ecity council to allow additions to existing single dwellings in required setbacks without having to approve a variance. The planning commission suggested at a previous meeting, that lot divisions be included as well, _ Commissioner Sletten moved the planning commission recommend the cit council adopt the ordinance to amend the setbacks and lot dimension requirements of the code. Comm Ayes--Commissioners Pellish seconded A es - -C y i ss i oners Barrett. Fischer, Larson, Pel 1 i sh, Robens, Si gmundi k, Sl etten k 4 J. J MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: City Manager Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner Sign Height.Variances 2158 Rice Street Signcrafters Sinclair Sinclair Pylon Sign November 21, 1984 diction by C r'_ r � w J�J , ll�i� • r+- L 2L t E Re SUMMARY. uest Approval of a 29 foot sign he variance. Proposal The applicant has erected a 57.9 foot tall lon sign, At h ' Py g t sign location, a setback of 11.8 feet, code permits a maximum height of 28.9 feet. A sign he i ht variance of 29 feet is, therefore p roposed, g Comments Due to the grading of the Cub Foods site during con g t uction the hill the Sinclair sign was on had to be cut. down. Sinclair agreed with Cub Foods to permit the removal of this hill as long as they would be allowed to reconstruct their 'si in the same location on a taller pole to maintain the sign visibility the had from Highway 36, y Staff. met with representati of Cub Foods and Si gncrafters, the sign i nstallers, - before the sign was erected. The app.l i cant c i n his l etter on page P g 7. that staff agreed to their maintaining the sign's height with a new sign of the hill was cut down T g to r Th e' applicant was, in actuality, informed by staff that if the sign was removed, it could only be reinstalled if i • t met code requirements or if avariance was obtained from council. The applicant subsequently a p p lied q y pp ed for a sign permit for a 35 —foot toll sign (see pa es 8 and 9 which wa g ) s approved, and then .erected it at 57.9 feet in height in violation of the -sign p ermit p and ordinance. State law requires that to approve a variance i • PP t must be found that. 1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of ci tances unique to the property under consideration, and 20 The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of h t e ordinance, The statute further states that undue hardship as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the variance if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. In this instance, the need for the excessive sign height was not 'a result of circumstances unique to the property, but instead, because of a situation created by the landowner by allowing the grading of his site, Recommendation Denial of the 29 -foot sign height variance and the variance to exceed the maximum allowable height of 50' feet for the Sinclair pylon sign. Denial is on the basis that: 1. The variance would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the code. 2. The excessive sign height situation was created by the landowner and was not due to circumstances unique to the property. 3. Council recently denied sign height variances for Cub Foods for two 30- foot tall pylon signs, F Site Description 1. Lot area: , 82 acres 29 Existing land use: Sinclair fuel station Surrounding Land Uses Northerly :. Count y Road B South and east: Cub Foods Westerly: Rice Street Past Action 11 -3 -83: Staff issued a sign permit for the erect' 35- foot of a 35 foot tall S i n c l a i r pylon s i g n as proposed by the applicant. Refer to ages 8 and to p ages 9 . 2- 27 -84: Council denied sign height variances of fi i ve feet to .two, 30-foot tall pyl signs that Cub Foods proposed. Refer to the ma on this request on the basis p page 6 • Council denied that: 1. There are not any physical characteri unique to the property which would cause an undue hardship if the code is complied with. 28 There is ample landscaped p d area in which the signs could be laced at their proposed height and sti meet the re ' wi tho ut P requir red 15 -foot setback l of any parking spaces. 3• Approval of a f hei ht vari ance g for the p roposed signs would be contrary to the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Conforming signs of 25 -feet tall would be Basil r y m County Road 8.and Rice Street at the p roposed location at ,the property li ne, PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 1. Land use pl designation: SC service c ommerc ial 20 Zoning: BC, business comemrc i a 1. 3• Section 36 - 352 (3) of th e sign code states that in n n, as other n o case shall the height of a freestandi sign, wise permitted by this section,- exceed a height of twenty -five feet at the property l ine. The heig foot for each addi ti ght may be � ncreased by one ona 1 three feet the sign i s set back from - to the front property li ne. Measurements shall b e the columns nearest the street front. The hei shall be measured vertically from the avers ght averag street or lot grade nearest the supporti columns to the h point of said sign, ' but i n no case wi ll this height exceed fifty feet to the top of the sign. 3 4. Section 367.10 subdivision 6 ( 2) o . f .the state law requires that findings be made before a vari ance can be the following granted: ' a. Strict enforcement cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. b. The variance would be i . n keeping with the spirit and intent of ordinance, the Undue hardship as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in put question cannot be to a r . P easonable use �f used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The l i h uni ue to his r P g t of the landowner is due to circumstances q p operty not created by the landowner, and the granted, wi ll not alter the essential char vari ance i f character of the locality. ty. P r r n r � A i o v r. 1 • Recomne ndat i on by the des review board 2. P ubl i c hearing and decision by the city cou y c 1. jc Attachments i. Location map 2. Property line /Zoning map 3. Applicant's letter dated 11 -16 -84 4, Sign Permit No. 483 dated 11 - -83 60 Sign plan submitted by the ap on PP 11 -3 -83 4 1 i� �f } - f �1 's i , f - 36 ' L APkx livE.• .1, 49 LI LE CANADA 35 Auer A0. 2S OUN h eL E Sandy _ � `A, AYL . LOA'• tK� e 1 K r rwA A W 0 V Mt k ON AVE!* J �0 WE V'LRIi01r AVE OWNS Av[. > ?t W 14 01[LAWN a. Avt cc t 3 I BELLWM A ►- L.W000 A ,,•: �1 suw A VIE. 4 _ FIX Tow VE 4 0 _ 10 > o _ oil L s W t 7 �9 SS 51 ST. PAUL LOCATION MAP attachment one I I FJ a , 1 PROPOSED 57.9' SINCLAIR .� STATION PYLON SIGN J � - I o lam_ �'• {. {� •.� :�ti� `:�:• • K; 1 .tom - - .. _ 1' ti•. . .��. � :ti•::�� ' •.tip- ti 30' CUB FOODS PYLON SIGNS DENIED BY COUNCIL ON 2 -27 -84 Y - ' CUB OO DS I • Schroeder Milk. ! o °e0 0 3 0 1 J� I a' ' I i PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 6 attachment two I a f E November 16, 1984 Outdoor Display, Inc. 7775 MAIN STREET NE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55432 612 -571 -2995 Mr. Tom Eks trand City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 RE: Sinclair sign, 2158 N Rice Street, Maplewood, MN Dear Tom: This letter will explain why the Sinclair sign is at its present height. Tom, I came to your office around the end of October 1983, with Tom Thueson of Cub Foods, regarding the existing pylon sign. Sinclair did not want to lower the sign nor remove it. It was necessary they have maximum height for visibility from the highway. During our discussion, you agreed the sign could stay at the existing height by adding 18 to 20 feet to the poles after the grade was removed to a lower level. All three of us at that meeting were of the opinion we had handled the problem and therefore we would install the new sign at a height of 53 feet from the new grade to the top. I have letters from three different partys to attest to the above. Also, I wrote a letter to Sinclair's attorney confirming the agreed height. Tom, as you can see by the attached correspondence we should never have had a problem to start with. I am sure you will clarify this with your records. You trul � Tack J. ` awrance P r e s i d e n t attachment three t � ►'♦ i a..' �' 1 ` �'. ♦ U11 ��\t 1♦ 1 1 J %�V. ��� S U ,' . ♦ ,� r L LL B L� L UNLI _ : r.:.L G* iii: FL" LO►•; I1,C 11 'JT10! I S I1iCLUN.D. r T -- �- j PERMIT FEE /6 v . PERMIT 140. � APPLI CATI 014 FOR S Gfr PERMIT City of Maplewood Street address of proposed sign n o S J p p g l ca t� on J; If temporary, date to be removed The undersigned hereby makes a i cat • - • • 9 y pp on for a permit for the work herei n specified, ed, agreeing to do all work in s tri.ct compliance with Ci ordinances and Rulings of the Community Devel and y p Department and hereby declares that all the facts representations stated i n this application are true and cor • rect. An electrical permit must be obtained if the sign is to be electr••cal y connected. . Applicant (N of Business,) • Ph n (dayti o e 71 7i S Andress 7 7 5� Name of constructing agent: Constructing agent's address: Phone (dayti _ S7/ Is the constructing agent licensed i n Ma l ewood? . p DESCRIPTION Zoning of l Work intended:, Sign Installation Sign Repair T e of Sign:' - yp g Pylon Pro�ect� nc Wall Roof Dimensions: Length Distance above - Street grade Constructed of: Metal too"P1 as ti c Il 1 wni na ti on: Flashing External Message j c49n .n .'A Signe / 7 // 'el-v V-01". = Sign Alteration Billboard Ground Temporary Othe r Hei ght S Roof Metal and Board !/I nternal Indirect DETAILS OR REMARKS 1�7Q 'T r^ 0 Ile— A 0 S (OVER) v 46 8 Other Marquee 30 � Se nent four t r- r 1 )Petty Of !�,C Td • lIV Inc. MY hog — ,1 h E "ST MiliNtSOTM Attachment Five B. Sinclair' Sign Height Variance (Rice Street) Jack Lawrence of Si gncraf ters was present at the meeting. He represents Sinclair Oil in their s i gnage. Cub Food . obta i.ned some of the S i n c l a i r property. At that time there was a sign up that was 32 feet high which was located about 5 to ") feet from the rear of Si ncl ai is propert-9 line. It was on a hill situated at an elevation of 18 to 22 feet. Theyw a meeting with Cub foods and staff of the city regarding the s i tuat -on with the height of the sign. He informed staff that they wished to stay at ° the present height they were at. They took the road grade which would be =18 to 22 feet high. He was informed there would be no problem a variance would not be required. He informed the owner that the sign .could be installed at an elevation height of 53 feet. The applicant read a letter from the Cub representative which also indicated that the understanding was that the 53 foot. sign would be permitted. The sign, as it is installed at the present location, is at a lower grade than what the street is. The board indicated that a Cub Foods was denied a request for a five foot variance for two signs.. Secretary Ekstrand indicated that the sign was on.a hill, he did not give authority to anyone to put up a sign of the height that has been installed. He informed the applicant that if a sign is taken down, the new sign must comply with code or request a variance. The permit that was applied for was for a 35 -foot tall sign. The city did check the height of the sign with surveying instruments. Also, the sign is not meeting the required 30 foot setback. The board reviewed with staff the code requirements for the zoning district as to sign height and location. Board Member Juker moved the board recommend denial of the 29 -foot sign height variance and the variance to exceed the maximum allowable height of 50 -feet for the Sinclair pylon sign. Denial is on the basis that: 1. The variance would not be in. keeping with the spirit and intent of the code. 2. The excessive sign height situation was created by the landowner and was not due to circumstances unique to the property. 3. Council recently denied sign height variances for Cub Foods for two 30 -foot tall pylon signs. Board Member Rossbach seconded Ayes "all i on by C MEMORANDUM T0: City Manager FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson SUBJECT: Frost Avenue Reconstruction -- Birmingham Street to Adele Street (Project 83 -1) DATE: December 6, 1984 Request Decide whether this project is in compliance with the city's comprehensive plan. Background . State law requires that the planning commission review all public capital improvement projects within the city. Section 462.356, subdivision 2, of State law states that: "After a comprehensive municipal.plan or section thereof has been recommended by the planning agency and a copy filed with the governing body, no publicly owned interest in real property within the municipality shall be acquired or disposed of, nor shall any capital improvement be authorized by the municipality or special. district or agency thereof or any other political subdivision having jurisdiction within the municipality until after the planning agency has reviewed the proposed acquisition, disposal, or capital improvement and reported in writing to the governing body or other special district or agency or political subdivision concerned, its findings as to compliance of the proposed acquisition, disposal or improvement with the comprehensive municipal plan." Project Description This project would consist of the reconstruction of Frost Avenue between Birmingham and Adele Streets and construction of storm sewer and storm water.ponding improvements in the vicinity. Existing water mains and sanitary sewer are adequate. (Refer to the enclosed feasibility study.) On November 26, 1984, council chose to drop the proposed sidewalk improvements from the project. This project is the final stage of the upgrading of Frost Avenue between Highway 61 and White Bear Avenue. .Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan 1. Frost Avenue is .designated as a minor arterial within the project area. (Refer to the enclosed Gladstone Land Use Plan on page 3.) The street width would be 52 feet from curb to curb. This is consistent with minor arterial design standards. 2., Gloster Park (Frisbie Avenue and Frank Street) would be designed ry as a storm water overflow area for the pond adjacent to the east. (See the map in the enclosed feasibility study.) The park facilities would have the probability of being inundated after a major storm for a short period-of time. According to the city engineer, this. situation would have a negligible effect on the use of the park facilities. 3. The storm sewer, shown in the drainage plan (attachment 2 ) to the north of Frisbie Avenue, between English Street and the. proposed storm water pond, would be constructed privately when the Burlington Northern property develops. As such, it is not shown in the feasibility study. Drainage Plan More ponding capacity is required than shown in the drainage plan. This is due to Ramsey County's recent construction of a water ualit q Y treatment system for the chain of lakes. The drainage plan had anticipated a storm sewer discharge to Keller Creek of about 40 cfs. This rate of discharge was reduced to 10 cfs as part of the county's treatment system requirements, hence the need for more storm water retention capacity. The drainage plan is not part of the Comprehensive Plan Update, therefore, a plan amendment : is not needed. Recommendation Find Project 83 -1 in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Update. jw Enclosures Gladstone Land Use Plan Drainage plan Feasibility study 2 iG Ha zel wood major collector , — - 1 • _ English r — major col it _Arcade Q� of A i.. O• A E White Bear Ave. L c . CD .L i . I J o _ CMD • ca a. o memo E Ca _ Coe) .� .. at 1 0 � I t MID 1 orc moose X1.,1 1 major arf T. H. 61 .a �. • ,; � . j 1. � 1 ,' ., ' ' Ho '• .. gyp► Gladstone Ana I wood NEIGR IRO A Q � USE PLAN ReVlsed: -1 - 2- 2.1 -84 3 ' 19 -17 Attachment 1 ev 24 C MAJOR WATERSHED DIVIDE INTERIOR WATERSHED DIVIDES PROPOSED STORM SEWER 42) EXISTING STORM SEWER OPEN CHANNEL STORM WATER STORAGE AREA INUNDATION AREA STORAGE AREA VOLUME 4 4 DISCHARGE IN CFS CITY LIMITS I- EXCERPT FR0j',1 THE DRAI14AGE PLAN 4 Attachment 2 4 i MEMORANDUM . -i 1L f' INa r � r v TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City En.g i neer SUBJECT: Frost Avenue Improvements Public Hearing Project No. 83 -1 DATE: January 7 1935 Enclosed herewith is the feasibility report on the Frost Avenue Improvements which was accepted with the exception that all sidewalk improvements be removed, at the November 26, 1934 meeting. The feasibility report has not been amended to show the removal of the sidewalk improvements. However, the projected assessment rates for the street and storm sewer improvements do not change due to the removal of the sidewalk. Notice has been given of a public hearing and a representative from the Ramsey County engineering staff will be present to answer questions regarding project design plans. mb Enc. 0 RESOLUTION.0RDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, after due notice of public hearing on the construction. of street and storm sewer improvements on Frost Avenue from Adele to Birmingham Streets, a hearing on said improvement in accordance with the notice duly given was duly held on January 14, 1935, and the council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter* and has fully considered the same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That it is advisable, expedient, and necessary that the City of Maplewood construct street and storm sewer improve- ments on Frost Avenue as described in the notice of hearing thereon, and orders the same to be made. 2. The city engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement. t 0" r � MEMORANDUM TO:. City Manager FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson SUBJECT: Tax- exempt Financing Multiple Dwelling and Housing Bond Plan Amendment APPLICANT: Health Resources Assist Corporation LOCATION 2696 Hazelwood Avenue Action by Cc1,j � PROJECT: Hazel' Ridge Seniors' Residence DATE: January 2, 1985 SUMMARY F c:L__.._ - -- D t. Request 1. Preliminary approval of a $5.8 million tax - exempt mortgage revenue bond program to construct a senior citizens residence with approxi- mately 100 units. 2. Amend the city's housing bond plan to include this program. Proposal 1. See the applicant's letter of request on page 11. 2. The units would be market rate, with average proposed rents of: a. One- bedroom units: $725 /month b. Two - bedroom units: $900 to $1600 /month These rents include the cost of supportive services, such as : transportation, home care nursing and a portion of the cost of meals. 3. Sixty percent of the units would have one bedroom. 4. The target population would be persons 62 years of age and older. 5. Construction is proposed to begin next spring and be completed next fall. 6. Council approval of a new planned unit development would be requested in February or March. (The previous approval has expired. See past actions.) 7. The city's full faith and credit would not back these bonds . Reasons for an Incomplete Application The applicant is asking council to consider this request before the required market study is completed . Refer to the letter on page 11) . Council's policy is that, in addition to compliance with the land use and housing plans, two findings must be made to approve tax- exempt financing for multiple- dwelling developments. These findings are: 10. That the development will not adversely affect the vacancy rates of existing multiple - dwelling complexes in the city, and d 2. That the federal low -to- moderate income requirements would be complied with. An independent market study is required to document that a proposal will be consistent with these requirements. The applicant intends to submit the required report as soon as it is completed, most likely in early February. Their problem is that they want. council to consider this request before the United States Treasury Department's proposal to eliminate tax - exempt financing for housing developments, is submitted to committee in mid- Jranuary. rnmmccni -c This proposal is consistent with the land use and housing plans. There appears to be a need for additional seniors units in this area, however, the number of a d d i t i o n a l units needed or the need for market rate versus subsidized units will not be known until the market study i.s completed. Conditional preliminary approval would satisfy the applicant's needs without compromising the city's tax- exempt financing approval requirements. 1 Recommendation Adopt the enclosed resolution (page 14) , granting:. 1. Preliminary approval for one year of $5.8 million in tax - exempt mortgage revenue bond financing for the Hazel Ridge senior apartments, proposed to the east of 2696 Hazelwood Avenue, on the basis that the development would be consistent with the comprehensive plan. Final approval shall not be granted until a qualified real estate marketing analyst certifies that: a. The development will not have a negative impact on the vacancy rates of existing multiple dwellings in the city. b. There is reasonable assurance that the development will be able to comply with the 20 percent low -to- moderate income requirement over the life of the bend issue. The following conditions shall be required if final approval is granted: a. Payment of a lump sum or annual program participation fee, whichever would be more beneficial to the city, as follows: (1) Lump sum fee: At bond closing, a lump -sum fee shall be paid in the amount of one percent of the bound issue, not to exceed $20,000, less the $2,000 application fee, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions. 2 '. (2) Annual fee An annual fee payable on each anniversary 1 of the bond issue of not less . than one- eighth of one percent of the unpaid balance and one - quarter of one percent of the bond issue shall be paid at bond closing, subject to federal arbitrage restsictions.l b. The bond indenture agreement shall require: (1) The developer to.annually certify on the anniversary date to the city, compliance with federal low --to- moderate income requirement. (2) The program trustee, as approved. -by the city council, shall inform the. city of any noncompliance trends, regarding the low -to- moderate income.occupancy requirement.. 2. Amending the housing bond plan to include a $5.8 million dollar tax- exempt.financing program for the Hazel Ridge apartment project. The resolution for this amendment shall not be sent to the Metropol i tan .Council until the conditions for preliminary approval have been satisfied*-, 3 BACKGROUND Site Description s Size: 3.9 acres - existing building and parking 6.1 acres - remainder of the site 10.0 acres Existing land use: 1. Existing building- -this structure is being used for the appli- cant's offices and community services programs, community health education and a daycare facility. 2. Remainder of the site - -the city has a lease to operate two ball fields on this property "provided said use does not conflict with the use of the property by the applicant." Surrounding Land Uses North and east: Hazelwood Park South: A single dwelling on a 4.4 acre parcel, planned for RL, residential lower density use. West: Hazelwood Avenue. Across the street are several single dwellings on larger lots. Past Actions 1. This site: Mockjaw Council approved a conditional use permit for the applicant to operate community service programs subject to five conditions. 10 -7 -82: Council approved a plan amendment from SC to RB, residential business for this site. 4- 11 -83: Council approved a conditional use permit, including variance for floor area and parking spaces, for the Hazel Ridge planned unit development (page 10) , subject to four conditions. 4 -9 -84: Council approved a two -year time extension for the Hazel Ridge planned unit development on the basis that the community services programs have not had an adverse effect on the neighborhood and the applicant has made a good faith effort to proceed to construction. Renewal was subject to: 19 The conditions of the permit approved on April 11, 1983 as amended August 8, 1983. 2. Construction of the Hazel Ridge cooperative residence beginning within six months. (This condition was not met. ) A City -wide: 10-8 -84: Council granted preliminary approval for a $3.8 million tax- exempt financing program for the Maple Ridge apartments to be constructed northeast of County Road D and Hazelwood Avenue, Planning 1. Land Use Plan designation: RB, - residential business -high density. .This classification is designed for high density residential and office uses. 2.- Policies criteria from the plan - -page 12.9: Housing for the elderly should meet the following criteria: a. Develop housing options for the elderly should be close to' supportive services and commercial facilities. b. Sites should be located so that quick response time for emergency services (i.e. medical, ambulance, police, and fire) can be provided, C. Projects should be encouraged to locate at sites near other age groups and housing types. 3. Density: Permitted - 34 people /net acre Proposed 23.9 people /net acre 4. Zoning: F, farm residence 5. Site and building plans will have to be approved by council' ounc i l' and the design review board before final approval of the bond issue could be granted.. Housing 1. The following requirements have been adopted by council for approval of tax - exempt mortgage revenue financing for multiple d w e l l i n g s : a. The .development shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan. b. The development will not have a negative impact on the vacancy rates of existing multiple dwellings in the city. c. There is reasonable assurance that the development will be able to comply with the 20 percent low -to- moderate income requirement over the life .of the bond issue, d. The bond indenture agreement shall require: (1) The developer to annually certify to the city, on the anniversary date of the bonds, compliance with the federal low -to- moderate income requirement: (2) The program trustee, as approved by the city council, shall inform the city of any noncompliance trends. 5 Federal law re arding the issuance of tax- exempt mortgage revenue 2. Fe g bonds for multiple-family housing requires at least . 20 percent of the P units to be occupied* by low -to- moderate income persons until the bonds are retired. Once a person or family is income - qualified, their unit counts toward the twenty percent requirement a long as they reside in the unit even though their income may rise above the ce i 1 i ng . Low-to-moderate income is def ined as an annual adjusted household income of 80 percent or less of the average annual income in the twin city area. In 1984 the 80 percent ceiling was $25,2800 (Gross .income is reduced b $750 per adult and $5.00 per child to. calculate adjusted annual income..) In 1984, the Metropolitan Council's suggested rent ceiling for low -to- moderate income households was $515 P er month excluding the cost of utilities for housing without specialized supportive services such as proposed by the applicant. bond plan amendment: Council's adoption of the housing 4. Housing p bond plan in Oc tober 1982 authorized the use of tax- exempt financing dwellings.. This plan, however, did not include specific for multiple development programs* rams. As a result, each time a development is g approved for this financing, council must amend the housing bond plan. The amendment must be reviewed by the Metropolitan Council before the developer s request for the tax - exempt financing can be submitted to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for approval. 5. This site was fours d to be a good site for seniors housing and documented as such in a feasibility study completed for the HRA in August 1982 by Solomonson and Associates, real estate market analysts. Finance In August, 1984, Council chose to require: 1. A P ro P artici P ation fee for city approval of these requests. g ram P The fee is to be based upon one of the two following formulas. The choice between the formulas i s to be made by council at the time the final resolution is adopted: -sum fee: At bond closing, a Jump- a . Lump fee shall be paid in the amount of one percent of the bond issue, not to exceed $20. :- 000 less. the application fee, subject to federal arbitragae restrictions. • annual fee payable on each anniversary of the b. Annual fee: An a P Y bond Issue of not less than one - eighth of one percent of the balance and one -quarter of one percent of the bond issue unpaid bal q be aid at bond closing, Shall p . subject to federal arbitrage restrictions. 2. The city may use the program participation fee for any purpose. DrnrcnAii 'e 1. HRA recommendation 2. City council decision, following a public hearing 3. Submission of the housing bond plan amendment to Metropolitan Council to review for consistency with the Metropolitan Housing Guide, 4. Su.bmiss'ion of the Hazel Ridge apartment bond program to the MHFA for approval. mb Attachments: 1. Location map 2. Property line map 30 Previously approved site plan 4. Letter of request S. Resolution 7 'R 3 Monson Ann . t* Z VI 0 - 9C • Y1 K K Beam Av enue AM, aftw; mo ll Ike 0. i N MT ri • R • PU0 ir A F R op • v R do' Lac Sc F lk R RJR •• it Highway 36 • M • I �ago ® R3 r - Irl s or . f _ L OC R or S Avg - • o or R : ��..�. R R F dp LOCATION MAP g Attachment One N r_ PROPERTY LINE MAP Attachment Two 4 N "r' VjLL A L 0 faA F'L C v: VC' r:;, hF�a i : # 1 s • i V .r - 1 'Z 1 • • r i . � 1 • � 1 1 ,. •3 c ►oc .. . •00:, r - D �T . mo o, • - ..:.... .. ►� %:= :���i :; (-:% T O N CO u i- T y '. •• 1 :-� CD f Lli o t� � p z' UJO0 ;•t� Y - wl • . l "• •� ... .2666,��. _- - 1559 .1585 • A.4�� �41C,r C 0 j� r_ PROPERTY LINE MAP Attachment Two 4 N "r' � \ Pond COfM�eC�ie - - 1 uty Trot \ �_ _ — — r s - f = � 1 - - - - 3 Story Apartment ? Building 72 " Over Parking ' Garage 72 Cars; WAS pe s"d 'To Orient "her To South Sir+ or -i To Northeast Viers Aad j To duller Winter Wind#4 • +1 Wood Frarns} Constructior. JL .`,. AI ` J it t •4 4 t i t Proposed H e dqe ---� N :s so ,00• 1 -- Propose Ha zelwood Ave. La ndscaping Site / Building Schematic Oriented South Or Northeast / � G �b i DR Genen 2 Bedroom Unit �i $50 to FL Dwelling Units 47 - 1 Bedroom At 710 Sq. FL Ea 25- 2 Bedroom At 850 Sq. Ft. Ea. 7 2 Units Parking 136 Exist Building 72 Garage Proposed 1d Surface 226 Total Spaces Apartment Building Areas Garage - 24,000 Sq. FL ApartTw7t Building - 3 Levels At 24,000 Sq. FL Ea : 72,000 Sq. FL 06,000 Sq. FL Total Site Size 10.6 Acres Buildi Covers e 44,000 Sq. Ft Exist Bulldog 24,000 Sq FL H Pro jec 68,000 Sq. FL Total 15% Of ; Open Space 6.0 Acres /57% Of Site Density. 8.1 People /Acre N No Scab Attachment Three 01+ 40114 Flow$ 0601% Senior Homes M1L1 HANS Propose WESTERBE Health. Resources, Inc. . BE 2696 Hazelwood Ave. I Maplewood, MN 55109 Brauer & a Ltd. Inc Assac�ates 7901 Flying Cbud Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 E: Approved Site Plan 1.983 SurtE ,�40 _ �s 3I Data 10 Dwelling Unit Schematic B' ;HEALTH RESOURCES A SSISTANCE CORPORATION December 26, 1984 Mr. Geoff Olson Director of Community Development City of Maplewood 1902 East County Road B 'Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Olson: Health Resources Assistance Corporation is submitting an application for Tax - Exempt Mortgage-Revenue Financing to finance the.construction of Hazel Ridge. Hazel Ridge, as it is now conceptualized, will be an elderly rental project consisting of approximately 100 units. The number of one - bedroom units will number about.60 and two bedroom units will consitute the remaining number of apartments. As you may be aware, ownership of multi -unit senior projects have been met with, at best, a lukewarm response throughout the Twin Cities, When HRAC.determined an elderly rental ,project would be more responsive to the needs and demands of senior citizens than an.ownership building, it also began internal discussions on whether economies of scale suggested that 100 units rather than 75 might.be more appropriate. HRAC has tentatively concluded that approximately 100 units is, indeed, more appropriate. HRAC is submitting its IRB application at this time because of information it received in the first week of December that legislation will be introduced when Congress convenes in January that will effectively preclude the use of tax- exempt bonds for multi- family housing . projects. While such an action is not certain to occur, HRAC cannot assume it will not. If action.is not taken at this point and the legislation is intro- duced, it-could delay the Hazel Ridge project for yet another year. The need for senior housing in Maplewood and its neighboring suburbs exists. Our analysis of 1980 census data indicates that 20% of all owner - occupied homes in Maplewood have a head of household who is 62 or over. And yet, those over 62 comprise only 10% of the population in Maplewood. A Service of 105 Health Resources 2696 Hazelwood Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 612/ 770 -9133 _ -11- Attachment Four Mr. Geoff Olson Director of Community Development December 26, 1 98 4 Page -2 These same data indicate a total (both renter and owner- occupied) of 702 households in Maplewood where the head of household was 55 or-over. These data also indicate that 39% of those 702 house- holds had an annual income of $17,500 or more in 1979 dollars: Adjusting for inflation between 1980 and October 1984, this figure of $17,500 becomes $24,530. Similar data exists for the neighboring communities of White Bear Lake and North St. Paul. This information suggests there is a substantial number of elderly in Maplewood and surrounding communities. who,. if interested in housing and service alternatives to the single family home, have the economic to afford market -rate rental housing designed to provide supportive, independent living. The need for such services will continue to escalate due to the aging of our society, increased numbers of men and women (particu- lar) t women) living well into their eighties, continued constric- tions on government financing of elderly housing and funding problems in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. HRAC has moved its timetable for submission of an IRB application up from February to December because of the aforementioned con- gressional sessional legislation. In so doing we find it impossible to comply with the procedural requirement of submitting a market research study with the application itself. Be assured that HRAC will not ask City staff or appointed and elected officials of the City to waive this application from policy requirements. It is our intent to fully comply with all policy and procedural requirements of this process. HRAC will have a market study conducted and it recognizes that any action of the HRA and City Council at the preliminary resolution step must provide for market study conclusions acceptable to the City prior to subse- quent actions at the time of a final resolution. HRAC believes it is important to proceed at this time because of the potential congressional action as well as indications the bond market will provide favorable interest rates in the first quarter of 1985. Inasmuch as this project, is finance- driven (or interest rate sensitive), proceeding now in order to utilize tax - exempt financing at a favorable moment in the. bond market will benefit all of us. However, its greatest _benefit will-inure to futur e tenants of Hazel Ridge in the form of the most inexpensive debt service possible. We want to thank the City and its staff for all the support received to date for Hazel Ridge and we, as you, look forward 12 Mr. Geoff Olson 4 Director of Community Development December 26, 1984 to the development of a housing prof ect - of which all of Maplewood can be proud Enclosed is the application for financing and the $2,000 fee. Also enclosed is some comparative census information for Maplewood and Ramsey County. If there are any questions, please call me at 770 - 9133.. Sincerely yours, John Hurley Director Outreach Senior Services os encs cc: Randall Johnson, Associate Planner City of Maplewood James B. Swanson, Vice President- operations Health Resources, Inc. 13 RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A FINANCING PROGRAM FOR A MULTI - FAMILY RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT AND THE P ROG RAM , AND THE AMENDMENT OF THE HOUSING REVENUE BOND PROGRAMS PORTION OF THE CITY'S 462C HOUSING PLAN TO INCLUDE THE PROGRAM PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES,.CHAPTER 462C, AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD TO ISSUE HOUSING REVENUE BONDS AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION. OF THE FINANCING PROGRAM FOR THE PROJECT FOR APPROVAL TO THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE SAID PROJECT AND PROGRAM (HAZEL RIDGE ELDERLY PROJECT) WHEREAS, (a) Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C (the "Act) confers upon cities the power to issue revenue bonds to finance a program for the purposes of planning, administering, making or purchasing loans with respect to one or more multi - family housing developments within the boundaries of the city; (b) The City has received from a Minnesota limited or general partnership to be formed with Health Resources Assistance Corporation as a general partner (the "Developer "), a proposal that the City undertake a program to finance a Project hereinafter described, through the issuance of revenue bonds or obligations. (in one or more series or which. may be in the form of a single debt instrument) (the "Bonds" ) pursuant to the Act (c) The City desires to: facilitate the development of rental housing within the community; encourage the development of affordable housing opportunities for residents of the City; encourage the development , of housing facilities designed attachment five for occupancy by persons of low or moderate income; and encourage the development of blighted or underutilized land and structures within the boundaries of the City; and the Project will assist the City in achieving these objectives; (d) The City desires to expand the "Housing Revenue Bond Programs" portion of its 462C Housing Plan to incorporate the program for the Project; (e) The Developer is currently engaged in the business of providing health care and housing. The Project to be financed by the Bonds is the construction and equipping of a building containing approximately 100.rental units, anticipated to consist of 60 one - bedroom units and 40 two - bedroom units, located immediately northeast of the corpor- ate headquarters of Health Resources, Incorporated at 2696 Hazelwood Avenue in the City, which will result in the provision of additional rental housing opportunities to persons within the community; (f) The City has been advised by the Developer that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital costs of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the Project would be significantly reduced, but the Developer has also advised the City that with the aid of municipal financing, and resulting low borrowing costs, the Project is economically more feasible; (g) A public hearing on the Project, the financing program and the amendment of the "Housing Revenue Bond Programs" portion of the City's 462C Housing Plan therefor was held at 7:45 p.m. on January 14, 1985, after notice was published, all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.05, subd. 5, at which public hearing all those appearing at said hearing who desired to speak were heard; (h) No public of ficial of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly benefit financially from the Project. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City hereby gives preliminary approval to the proposal of the Developer that the City undertake the Project, described above, and the program of financing therefor, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, consisting of the construction and equipping 'of multi - family rental housing facilities within the City pursuant to the Developer's specifications and to a revenue agreement between the City and the Developer on such terms and conditions with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary, so as to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal and interest on the Bonds in a total principal amount of approx- imately $5,800,000 to be issued pursuant.to the Act to finance the construction and equipping of the Project; and said agreement - may also provide for the entire interest of the Developer therein to be mortgaged to the purchaser or purchasers of the Bonds, or a trustee for the holder(s) of the Bonds; and the City hereby undertakes preliminarily to issue its bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions; 2. The "Housing Revenue Bond Programs" portion of the City's 462C Housing Plan as herein proposed to be amended is hereby approved and adopted and the City Clerk is authorized and directed to submit the amended 462C Housing Plan to the Metropolitan Council for its review. and .comment. The comments of the Metropolitan Council, if any, shall be submitted to the City Council for its consideration; _ 3. At the option of the Developer, the financing may be structured so as to take advantage of whatever means are available and are permitted by law to enhance the security for, or marketability of the Bonds; provided that any such financing structure must be . approved by the City; 4. On the basis of information available to the City, it appears, and the City hereby finds, that the Project constitutes a multifamily housing development within the meaning of subdivision 5 of Section 462C.02 of the Act; that the Project will be primarily occupied, in part, by persons of low or moderate income; that the availability of the financing under the Act and the willingness of the City to provide such financing ancin will be a substantial inducement to the Developer if effect of the Project, f undertake the Project, and that the will be to encourage the provision undertaken, on of additional multi-family rental housing opportunities to residents of the City, t o assist in the prevention of the emergence of blighted and marginal land and to promote more intensive development and use of land within the City; 5. The Project, and the program to finance the Project by the • issuance of revenue bonds, is hereby given preliminary PP Y elimina approval b the City subject to the approval of the financing program ram b the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (the "MHFA ") and subject to final approval by the City, the P Develo er and the purchasers of the Bonds as to ultimate details of the financing of the Project; 6. In accordance with subdivision 5 of Section 462C 0 5 Minnesota Statutes, the Mayor of the City is hereby authorized and directed to submit the program for financing the Project to the MHFA, requesting its approval, and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby de the MHFA with authorized to prove preliminary information as P it may require; 7. The Developer has agreed and it is hereby determined that an and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project whether or not the Project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by MHFA will be paid by. the Developer; 8. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting_ as bond counsel, is authorized to assist in the and review of necessary documents relating to the preparation Prod ect and the financing program therefor, to consult with the Ci t y y. 0 9 Attorney, the City's p s fiscal consultant, Developer and purchasers of the Bonds (or trustee for the purchasers of the Bonds) as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms and provisions of the Bonds ' and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary documents and submit such documents to the City for final approval; 9. Nothing in this Resolution or the documents erred pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal al funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose. The Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or funds of the Y Cit except the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall the City be subject to any liability thereon. The holder or holders of the Bonds shall never have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the outstanding principal on the Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereon against any property of the City. The Bonds shall recite in substance that P Y the Bonds, including the interest thereon, are payable solely from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof. The Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation; lo. In anticipation of the approval by the MHFA and the issuance of the Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Project,. and in order that completion of the project will not be unduly delayed when approved, the Developer is hereby authorized to make such expenditures and advances toward payment of that portion of the costs of the Project to be f inanced from the proceeds of the Bonds, as the Developer considers necessary, including the use of interim, short-term financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Bonds if any when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part Of the City; 11. If construction of the Project is not started within one Y ear from the date hereof, this resolution shall thereafter have no force and effect and the preliminary approval herein granted is withdrawn; 12. The , a of the City Clerk in causing public notice of the P ublic hearing and in describing the general nature of the Project and estimating the principal amount of the Bonds to be issued to finance the Project is in all respects ratified and confirmed; 13. Final approval for. the Project and the issuance of the Bonds will not be granted until the City has received the following: a. evidence that the Project is consistent with the comprehensive plans b. documentation from a qualified real estate market- ing analyst evidencing (i) that the Project will not have a negative impact on vacancy rates of existing multiple dwellings in the City and (ii) that the development will be able to comply with the federal low and moderate income requirements (as set forth in the housing program) over the life of the bond issue. f Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota this 14th day of January, 1985. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAP LEWOO D I. the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a, full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to a resolution giving preliminary approval to a multi - family rental housing development project. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 14th day of January, 1985. City Clerk (SEAL) P t BROOKS SUPERETTE � ��- ��'��' by � - ��' S, INC. 1 0 � .h_ 1 �! E :w? _ _.o..� -.� . Date— • January 4, 1985 07 Mr. Barry Evans City Manager City of Maplewood 1902 E. County Rd. B Maplewood, MN 55109 RE: Reconsideration - Brooks Superette Rezoning Dear Mr. Evans: The purpose of'this letter is to request reconsideration of the action of the City Council on December 10, 1984, to rezone the Brooks Superette from BC, Business Commercial to RL, Residential Low Density. It is my understanding that this reconsideration will be heard at the January 14, 1985, City Council meeting. It is my further understanding that this reconsideration must be brought by a Councilmember on the prevailing side and that re- consideration will require at least a 3 -2 vote to approve. If the motion to reconsider is approved, a full hearing will be held at the next City Council meeting of January 28, 19850 We shall submit a letter - memorandum to your office to be forwarded to the City Council prior to the January 14th meeting. Very truly yours, Bruce D. Malkerson, Esq. Timothy Keane, AICP TJK:ap EXECUTIVE OFFICES: 4900 NORTH COUNTY ROAD 18, SUITE 303, NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA 55428 / 612 -537 -2787 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager ., FROM: Associate Planner--Johnson SUBJECT: Needs Assessment- -Older Adult Home Sharing APPLICANT: HRA and Older Adult Home Share Task Force Act.-ion b c�,. ✓_ DATE: December 19, 1984 En��. -��..� SUMMARY Re m +E� Request Da,_£ Authorize an expenditure of $1297 to determine if there is a need for a home -share program. Proposal 10 Conduct a mail survey of 2500 persons. The categories of households to be surveyed would be as follows: a. 1200 households with persons 6.0+ years of age, residing within the study area- -the jurisdictions of the Roseville, White Bear Lake and North St. Paul- Maplewood- Oakdale school districts. b. 393 households residing in selected senior residences. c. 900 households on the waiting lists for the selected seniors' residences. 2. The proposed questionnaires are presented on pages 10 and 11. They are designed to be printed on 8 1/2 x 14 paper. 3. A plan of action for the study effort is presented on page 12, Reasons for the Request The older adult home share task force was established in October 1984 in response to counci 1' -s d i rectiN to the HRA to study the concept of home sharing for senior citizens. The task force met on November 2, 16 and 30 to design a needs assessment methodology. The task force has completed the design phase. On November 30, 1984, the task force recommended that the City of Maplewood pay for the needs assessment. The reasons for this recommendation were to: 1. Maximize cooperation from each of the communities and school districts within the study area. 2. Eliminate any time delays that would result if other local units of government had to approve an expenditure . This is an important factor because the task force wants to be in a position to present any resulting program ro ram recommendations for the 1986 budget considerations. On December. 11, 1984, the HRA unanimously recommended to support the task force's request. Comments i The use of printed envelopes (colored city logo on the outgoing mail and printed addresses for the return mail) and regular postage versus bulk rate are . recommended because they are the least staff intensive, and they make for a more professional .appearing survey. These advantages out weigh the $163 cost difference between the cheapest and most expensive options. Surveying any fewer households to further reduce the costs would probably compromise the usefulness of the survey results. A postage rate increase from .20 to .22 could go into effect the middle of February. This would increase the cost of the survey by $92.00. The survey is presently scheduled to be mailed on January 25. Recommendation n Authorize the transfer of $1297 from the contingency fund to the community development administrative fund (01-4110-71,)* 2 BACKGROUND Study Area The White. Bear lake, Roseville and North St. Paul- Maplewood - Oakdale school districts each. have on -going senior citizen program expertise; including transportation, meals -on- wheels, counseling and education. The task force felt that because the districts could be potential administrators for a home -share program, that their entire juris- dictions should be included in the needs assessment study area. Survey Populations The task force felt that to accurately assess the need for a home - share program, three populations should be surveyed: 1. General population of older adults from the mailing lists maintained by the school districts.. 2. Persons living in selected seniors' residences. 3. Persons on the waiting lists for the selected senior residences. An effort would be made to eliminate any duple i at i on of names from one'l mailing list to another. Populations one and three would receive the same questionnaire (page 10) but it would be printed on a different color for each. Population two would receive the questionnaire on page 11. A breakdown of the survey populations is listed on page 80 Survey Size _ According to a statistician from Maxfield and Solomonson: 10 When.possible, at least 300 responses should be received for surveys involving a total population of several thousand, such as the survey of the persons on the school district ma i 1 ing lists, to be reasonably confident that the survey results are characteristic of the total population. Where the questionnaire is concise, a postage paid - envelope is included and there is coverage in the media about a survey being in progress,.a response of about 25 percent is generally achievable. This means that a sample of about 120.0 households should generate statistically realiable results. 2. For survey populations of less than 1.000, the entire population should be surveyed in an attempt to get a return equal to or greater than 25 percent of the ,total population. A 100 percent sample is, therefore, proposed for the 393 residents of selected senior residences and the 900 persons on the waiting lists for these residences. .Survey Costs 1. Maplewood staff (Randall Johnson and Pauline Staples) with the assistance of task force volunteers will continue to staff the effort. 3 2. Out -of-- pocket expenses would. include postage and printing of the questionnaires,.env,elopes, mailing labels and cover letters. A detailed cost breakdown is presented on. page 5 . Cost reducing options are presented for bulk mail, .plain return envelopes versus printed. and embossed outgoing_ mail versus black ink without the city's logo. The least expensive options to survey all three populations would cost $1134. The most expensive options would cost $1297. Procedure 10 City council decision 2. See attached action plan (page 12) Attachments A. Detailed costs for needs assessment (page 5) B. Mailing list data (page 8) C. Survey cover letter (page 9) D - E. Questionnaires (pages 10 and 11) F. Needs assessment action plan (page 12) 4 ATTACHMENT A Detailed costs for Needs Assessment i . Survey including all three population groups A. Survey populations and sample size: - 1. School district mailing list survey. Total population of 5919 households. A sample of at least 1200 households is needed to achieve 300 responses. 249 Residents of selected seniors residences. Total population of 393 households. A 100 percent sample needed. ,.3. Persons on the waiting lists for selected seniors' residences. Total population 900 persons. A 100 percent sample is needed. Be Costs 19 Printing: a. Questionnaires (2500) $75.70 b. Cover letter (2500) 52.35 c. Outgoing envelopes (2500) Embossed with maple leaf 137.50 Black ink without maple leaf 90.60 d. Return envelopes (2500) Printed return address 88.60 Plain 20.25 Staff time to address 15900+ 36.00 Total $255 to $354 210 Postage: a. Outgoing (2100) Bulk rate $356 Regular rate 420 b. Return (2500) 5 Total $856 to $920 3) Mailing labels (- minimum 3300) $ 23 ''GRAND TOTAL: $1134 to $1297 II. Costs for each survey if undertaken individually A. School district mailing list survey 1 Printing: B . a. Questionnaires (1200) $39.25 b.. Cover letters (1200) 27 .42 c. Outgoing envelopes (1500 minimum) Embossed with maple leaf $102.25 or Black ink without maple leaf 67065 d. Return envelopes (1500 minimum) Printed return address (1500 min.) $65.65 or Plain $9.72 Staff time to address 6.00 16.00 Total $150 to $235 2. . Postage a. Outgoing Bulk rate $211.00 or Regular rate 240.00 b. Return (postage paid) .20 x 1200 240.00 Total $451 to $480 3 . Mailing labels ( 3300 ,minimum) 23.00 GRAND TOTAL $524 to $738 Residents of selected seniors' residences 1. Printing a. Questionnaire (393) $16.70 b. Cover letter (393) 12.04 c. Outgoing envelopes (500 minimum) s Embossed with maple leaf 72.75 or Black ink without maple leaf 47.00 d. Return envelopes Printed return address (500 min.) $45.00 or Plain ( 400 minimum) 3.24 Staff time address 3.00 7.00 Total $83 to $146 2. Postage a. Outgoing (will hand deliver) b. Return (postage paid) .20 x 393 C* Mailing labels ( 3300 minimum) GRAND TOTAL N/A $78.60 $185 to $248 Co Persons on the waiting lists of selected senior residences 1. Printing a. Questionnaires (900) $30.84 b. Cover letter (900) 21.70 c. Outgoing envelopes (1080 minimum) Embossed with maple leaf 78.75 Black in.k without maple leaf 51.50 d, Return envelopes Printed return address 50.50 Plain (1000 min.) 8.10 Staff time to address 6.00 15.00 Total $119 to $182 2. Postage a. Outgoing Bulk rate 172.00 or Regular rate (.20 x 900) 180:00 b, Return (postage paid) (.20 x 900 ) 1804,00 Total $352 to $360 39 Mailing labels (3300 minimum) 23.00 GRAND TOTAL : $494 TO $565 (a) Bulk rate cost calculation: 10 Printing cost for stamp imprint $ 32.50 20 .2100 x ,11 (440 senior resident questionnaires will be hand carried) 231.00 34, Staff time to sort and deliver ( about 8 hours associate planner salary, excluding fringe benefits) 92.57 356.00 7 v ATTACHMENT B X Mailing List Data 10 Senior Residences Residents Waiting List Archer Heights 68 28 Mike VanGuilder Franklyn Park 117 325+ Jo Christianson (770 1504) Washington Square 81 250+ Yvonne Brenhret (429 8440) Roseville Senior House 127 300+ Bev Bran tner (4 8 8 07 47 ) 393 903+ — Survey total population (25% = 98) (25% _ 226) 2. School District Mailing Lists White Bear Lake 2565 households Maplewood 930 households Roseville 2420 households 5915 households Sample size Response rate Number of surveys returned 1200 x .23 = 276 1200 x .25 - 300 1200 x .28 = ,33.6 CITZ' OF MAPLEWOOD 1902 FAST COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55 109 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 774 -4560 December 5, 1984 Good Morning: As more persons in the suburban areas on the north side. of St. Paul reach retirement age, the waiting lists for area seniors apartment buildings continue to grow. Recognizing the need to address this growing concern, several St. Paul suburban communities and their school districts are 1 ooki ng at the poss bi l i ty of starting a home -share program as a partial solution to the lack of available seniors' apartment units. .Home-sharing is generally defined as a homeowner agreeing to share their home with an individual or family for reasons involving security, companionship, income, assistance with household or yard tasks or transportation needs. It would be very much appreciated if you would take a .few minutes to complete the enclosed questionnaire. Your input w i l l help us decide whether there is a need to continue looking into the idea of starting a home - sharing program A stamped, self-addressed return envelope is enclosed to return your completed questionnaire. If y ou want more information about . the home - sharing idea, please call Pauline - Staples (770 -4574) or Randall Johnson (770 - 4560). Thank you very much for your time and assistance. Very truly yours, Lorraine'Fischer, Chairman Older Adult Home -Share Task Force D S ATTACHMENT D NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEY OLDER ADULTS HOME -SHARE PROGRAM Instructions PLEASE PLACE AN "X" NEXT TO EACH RESPONSE THAT APPLIES TO YOU (Put additional comments on back side of this questionnaire) Please indicate the community in which you live: Zip Code Little Canada Roseville Other (please specify) Maplewood Vadnais Hts. North St. Paul White Br. Lake Oakdale White Br. Township Your Present Situation 1. Marital Status: _single married _widowed or divorced How long? Age: _50 to 59 _60 to 69 _70 to 79 �80♦ Sex: Made Female 2. In what type of dwelling do you presently live? Own house Rent apartment Live' with friends or family Other (plea es specify) 3. How long have you lived at your current address? less than 2 years r 6 -10 years ` 21 or more years 2 -5 years 11 -20 years Your Housing Preferences 4. If you had to move from your present home, would you prefer to move to (please indicate your 1st, 2nd and 3rd .choices with a 1,2 and 3): �A rental apartment limited to older adults? A condominium, townhouse or cooperative residence, limited to older adults? A rental apartment with no age restrictions? �A condominium, townhouse or cooperative residence, with no age restrictions? A residence specifically designed for less than ten older adults? The single- family. house of a younger family or individual (not necessarily your family members)? _ The single- family home of a person (s) of a similar age to myself? 'Other, (please specify 5. As an alternative to having to move from your present home, Mould you share your home with an individual or family? YES. I would share my home for the following reasons (check as many items as are applicable): I need help with yard work Financial reasons I need held with house work iNeed companionship Health reasons Need for security Need for better transportation �Other(please specify) Comments: NO. I would not consider sharing my bone. Please take a few minutes to specify why are would not consider the idea of home- sharing. (Your reasons will be important to help us to understand any major problems that the public may have with this idea.) Reasons: 6. When you would want a home -share service to be available? within the next year 1 - years .3 -5 years Unsure I would no participate �I already participate in a home- share program. The contact person and telephone number are: Thank you for your assistance io belping as detezmi0e if tber* is a need to establish a home -share housing program. 10 ATTACHMENT E SURVEY or P ERSO NS LIVING IN SENIOR RESIDENCES Instructions PLEASE PLACE AN • X' NEXT TO EACH RESPONSE THAT APPLIES TO YOU (Put additional. comments on back side of this questionnaire) 1. In what city do you reside? 2. what is the name of your residence complex? 3. Your marital status: Single r married _divorced or widowed (if so,how long ?_) 4. Your se:: female male 5. Your age: 50 -59 60 -69 79 -79 80 +years 6. What type of dwelling did you l i v e * in before moving to your present residence? Single family house Apartment other (specify) 7. Would you have preferred to have remained in your previous home? Yes No B. Why did you choose to move to your present residence? - I needed help with yard work Financial reasons r I needed help with house work Need for Security i Need for better transportation ! Need for companionship _Other (please specify) The remainder of the questions refer to an idea called home - sharing. Home - sharing is defined as one person or family sharing their home with another person or family. Most commonly, an older persons chooses to share their home with another person as an alternative to having to move from their home. 9. If a home -share program would have been available that could have matched you with a compatible home - sharer, would you have considered staying in your previous home rather than moving to your present residence? YES. I would have considered sharing my home for the following reasons (check as many items as appro- priate): - ` I needed help with yard work _Financial reasons �I needed help with house work r Need l Security _Need for better transportation ,Need for companionship _ Other (please specify) NO. I would not have considered sharing my home. Please take a few minutes to specify why you would not have considred the idea of home sharing. (Your reasons will be important to help us to understand any major problems that the public may have with this idea.) Reasons: lo. Do you think there is a need to start a home -share program? Yes n o. 11. If a hoe* -share program were to be started, would you be Interested in moving to: The home of an individual or family? group home designed for ten or less older adults? Thank you for taking the time to answer "this questionnaire. Your input is very important to determining if a home -share program is needed in your area. You= responses will be given.careful consideration. 11 ACTION PLAN Older Adult Home -Share Task Force Time Frame Objective Oct.1984 1. Decide if there is local government support to study the issue. If there is a perceived need to forward set up a task force, as a subcommittee of the Maplewood HRA with the following membership: - Representatives from local government jurisdictions (city, county and school district) - Management representatives from.area senior resi- dences - Senior citizens 2. Establish a Needs Assessment Methodology Nov. 1984 a. Task Force consensus on the definition. o.f the ("Completed) home -share concept and geographic boundaries of the study area, Nov. 1984 be Task Force concensus on the. survey methods: (Completed) 1) Agree on the target population (s) to be surveyed* 2) Develop a questionnaire (s) and survey cover letter. 3) Agree on a pretest methodolgy. Dec. 1984 3. (In Progress) Dec. 1984 4. or Jan.1985 1/14/85 5. 1 /15 -18/85 6. 4) Estimate the cost of the postage and copying costs for the survey and pretest. Acquire total population mailing lists prepare the questionnaire (s) for printing, and prepare a mailing list (s) for label copying. Pretest the Questionnaire (s) a. Administer to a group of older adults at a senior's club meeting(s). (Try to have at least 30 -35 persons respond.) b. Revise the questionnaire as necessary. Request funding a proval for the needs assessment from the Maplewoo City Council Contact each local unit of government (cities and school districts) within the study area to explain the study objectives, give them sample copies of the survey and inform them that articles will be appearing in local newspapers. 12 5/3/85 9. Complete a written report to document the study methodology, findings 5/16/85 10. Committee adoption of the report or 5/24/85 6/3/85 11. Submit the report to appropriate jurisdictions for consideration. 1/15/85 7. Submit articles to newspapers serving the study area to advise the public that a study is in progress. 1/18/85 8. Initiate Needs Assessment a. Task Force.meeting to break into two subcom- mittees- -one to focus on the data to be obtained from the mail survey and the other to focus on the evaluation of the j c-74 -0 :pabilities, and needs of existing institutions to administer a home - share program. A staff person is to be assigned to each committee. 1/25/85 be Send out the questionnaires and begin the evaluation of existing institutions. 2/1/85 c. Send a follow -up article to area newspapers. 2/22/85 d. Task Force meetings to discuss results of the survey and agree on a recommended course (s) of action.. to 3 -22 -85 13 H MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Barry . R Evans, City Manager SUBJECT: City Hall DATE: January 8, 1985 Attached is a new agreement from Architectural Alliance for the expanded City Hall. A copy has been sent to the City- Attorney for his review as to form. � BRE :1 nb 6 rc ru a Lance r 400 Caton Avenue Sarah. Wr eapohs . Minnesota 55403 (612) 871-5703 Architecture • Planning Interior Design • Energy Design. Mr. Barry Evans City Manager City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 January 4, 1985 Dear Barry: As a follow -up to our meeting with the City Council o.n January 3, 1985 I am writing this letter to. confirm my understanding of the action you wish us to take. It is my understanding that the City Council desires us to i n i t i a t e planning for a freestanding City Hall/Public Safety F a c i l i t y southwest of the existing Public Works building.' This facility is to include both Community Development and Engineering portions of the upper 1 eve1 of Public Works, The layout w i l l be developed using 1990 square footage projections. This will result in a building of approximately 30,000 square feet. The estimated total cost for the facility, i n c l u d i n g site improvements is $2,250,000. At present, we . are contractually op.eratin.g under the first phase contract of $20,000. We had agreed that the overall fee would not exceed 7 -1/2% of the total construction cost. Based on the new construction cost of $2,250,000 at 7 -1/2%, the total fee is $168,750 minus $20,000 (phase 1) or $148,750. I have included a Standard AIA Contract B141 for Architectural /Engineering services i ncorporat i ng these prices for your review. If you feel comfortable with the contract, please pass it along to the City Attorney for his review, Thank you for all of your help. exciting project. Sincerely, HERBERT A. KETCHAM, JR. , FAIA Principal I look forward to an interesting and HAK /tab Enclosure Minneapolis/Saint Paul Twin Cities International Airport • Phoenix THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS AiA Document B141 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect 1977 EDITION THIS DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES; CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY IS ENCOURAGED WITH RESPECT TO ITS COMPLETION OR MODIFICATION AGREEMENT made as of the day of Hundred and BETWEEN the Owner: City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55.109 and the Architect: Architectural Alliance 400 Clifton Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 in the year of Nineteen For the following Project: New City Hall /Public Safety Facility (Include detailed description of Project location and scope. A new stand alone 30,000 S.F. (approx.) facility is to be constructed to house City Hall functions presently located in the existing City Hall and on the upper level of exi.sti ng Public Works, along with Public Safety functions, also located in the existing City Hall. This structure is to be located. on the City -owned 26.2 acre Public Works site off County Road 8 and one block east of White Bear Avenue. A detailed description of. the project scope is contained in the "Program Space Options, Site Analysis Report" for the City of Maplewood, dated December 1984. The Owner and the Architect agree as set forth below. Copyright 1917, 1926, 1948, 1951, 1953, 1958, 1961, 1%3, 1966, 1%7, 1970, 1974, ® 1977 by The American Institute of Architects, 1735 New York Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006. Reproduction of the material herein or substantial quotation of its provisions without permission of the AIA violates the copyright laws of the United States and will be subject to legal prosecution. ILIA DOCUMENT 11141 + OWNER - ARCHITECT AGREEMENT • THIRTEENTH EDITION • JUIY 1977 • AIAO + m 1977 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE Of ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 6141 -1977 1 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND ARCHITECT ARTICLE 'l . ARCHITECT'S -SERVICES AND RESPONSIBILITIES BASIC SERVICES The Architect's Basic Services consist of the, five phases described in Paragraphs 1.1 through 1.5 and include normal structural, mechanical and electrical engineering services and any other services included in Article 15 as part of Basic Services. SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE 1.1.1 The Architect shall review the program furnished by the Owner to ascertain the requirements of the Project and shall review the understanding of such requirements with the Owner. 1.1.2 The Architect shall provide a preliminary evalua- tion of the program and the Project budget requirements, each in terms of the other, subject to the limitations set forth in Subparagraph 3.2.1. 1.1.3 The Architect shall review with the Owner alterna- tive approaches to design and construction of the Project. 1.1.4 Based on the mutually agreed upon program and Project budget requirements, the Architect shall prepare, for approval by the Owner, Schematic Design Documents consisting of drawings and other documents illustrating the scale and relationship of Project components. 1.1.5 The Architect shall submit to the Owner a State- ment of Probable Construction Cost based on current area, volume or other unit costs. 1.2 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1.2.1 Based on the approved Schematic Design Docu- ments and any adjustments authorized by the Owner in the program or Project budget, the Architect shall pre- pare, for approval by the Owner, Design Development Documents consisting of drawings and other documents to fix and describe the size and character of the entire Project as to architectural, structural, mechanical and elec- trical systems, materials and such other elements as may be appropriate. 1.2.2 The Architect shall submit to the Owner a further Statement Of Probable Construction Cost. 1.3 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE 1.3.1 Based on the approved Design Development Doc- uments and any further adjustments in the scope or qual- ity of the Project or in the Project budget authorized by the Owner, the Architect shall prepare, for approval by the Owner, Construction Documents consisting of Draw- ings and Specifications setting forth in detail the require- ments for the construction of the Project. - 1.3.2 The Architect shall assist the Owner in the prepara- tion of the necessary bidding information, bidding forms, the Conditions of the Contract, and the form of Agree- ment between the Owner and the Contractor. 1.3.3 The Architect shall advise the Owner of any adjust- ments to previous Statements of Probable Construction Cost indicated by changes in requirements or general market conditions. 1.3.4 The Architect shall assist the Owner in connection with the Owner's responsibility for filing documents re- quired for the approval of governmental authorities hav- ing jurisdiction over the Project. 1.4 BIDDING OR NEGOTIATION PHASE 1.4.1 The Architect, following the Owner's approval of the Construction Documents and of the latest Statement of Probable Construction Cost, shall assist the Owner in obtaining bids or negotiated proposals, and assist in awarding and preparing contracts for construction. 1.5 CONSTRUCTION PHASEr-- ADMINISTRATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 1.5.1 The. Construction Phase will commence with the award of the Contract for Construction and, together with the Architect's obligation to provide Basic Services under this Agreement, will terminate when final payment to the Contractor is due, or in the absence of a final Certificate for Payment or of such due date, sixty days after the Date of Substantial Completion'of the Work, whichever occurs f i rst. 1.5.2 Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement and incorporated in the Contract Documents, the Architect shall provide administration of the Contract for Construc- tion as set forth below and in the edition of AIA Docu- ment A201, General Conditions of the Contract for Con- struction, current as of the date of this Agreement. 1.5.3 The Architect shall be a representative of the Owner during the Construction Phase, and shall advise and consult with the Owner. Instructions to the Contrac- tor shall be forwarded through the Architect. The Archi- tect shall have authority to act . on behalf of the Owner only to the extent provided in the Contract Documents unless otherwise modified by written instrument in ac- cordance with Subparagraph 1.5.16. 1.5.4 The Architect shall visit the site at intervals ap- propriate to the stage of construction or as otherwise agreed by the Architect in writing to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the Work and to determine in general if the Work is proceeding in accord- ance with the Contract Documents. However, the Archi- tect shall not be required to make exhaustive or con- tinuous on -site inspections to check the quality or quan- tity of the Work. On the basis of such on -site observa- tions as an architect, the Architect shall keep the Owner informed . of the progress and quality of the Work, and shall endeavor to guard the Owner against defects and deficiencies in the Work of the Contractor. 1.5.5 The Architect shall not have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work, for the acts or omissions of the Contractor, Sub- AIA DOCUMENT 8141 OWNER- ARCHITECT AGREEMENT • THIRTEENTH EDITION • JULY 1977 0 AIA9 • ®1977 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE. Of ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 B141 -1977 3 contractors or any other persons performing any of the Work, or for the failure. of any of them to carry out the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 1.5.6' The Architect shall at all times have access to the Work wherever it is in preparation or progress. 1.5.7 The Architect shall determine the amounts owing to the Contractor based on observations at the site and on evaluations of the Contractor's Applications for Payment, and shall issue Certificates for Payment in such amounts, as provided in the Contract Documents. 1.5.8 The issuance of a Certificate for Payment shall constitute a representation by the Architect to the Owner, based on the Architect's observations at. the site as pro- vided in Subparagraph 1.5.4 and on the data comprising the Contractor's Application for Payment, that the Work has progressed to the point indicated; that, to the best of the Architect's knowledge, information and belief, the qual- ity of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Docu- ments (subject to an evaluation of the Work for con- formance with the Contract Documents upon Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests re- quired by or performed under the Contract Documents, to minor deviations from the Contract Documents cor- rectable prior to completion, and to any specific qualifica- tions stated in the Certificate for Payment); and that the Contractor is entitled to payment in the amount certified. However, the issuance of a Certificate for Payment shall not be a representation that the Architect has made any examination to ascertain how and for what purpose the Contractor has used the moneys paid on account of the Contract Sum. 1.S.9 . The Architect shall be the interpreter of the re- quirements of the Contract Documents and the judge of the performance thereunder by both the Owner and Contractor. The Architect shall render interpretations nec- essary for the proper execution or progress of the Work with reasonable promptness on written request of either the Owner or the Contractor, and.shall render written de- cisions, within a reasonable time, on all claims, disputes and other matters in question between the Owner and the Contractor relating to the execution or progress of the Work or the interpretation of the Contract Documents. 1.5.10 Interpretations and decisions of the Architect shall be consistent with the intent of and reasonably inferable from the Contract Documents and shall be in written or graphic form. In the capacity of interpreter and judge, the Architect shall endeavor to secure faithful perform- ance by both the Owner and the Contractor, shall not. show partiality to either, and shall not be liable for the result of any interpretation or decision rendered in goad faith in such capacity. 1`.S.11 The Architect's decisions in matters relating to artistic effect shall be final if consistent with the intent of the Contract Documents. The Architect's decisions on any other claims, disputes or other matters, including those in question between the Owner and the Contractor, shall be subject to arbitration as provided in this Agree- ment and in the Contract Documents. 1.5.12 The Architect shall have authority to reject Work which does not conform to the Contract Documents. Whenever, in the Architect's reasonable opinion, it is necessary or advisable for the implementation of the intent of the Contract Documents, the Architect will have author- ity to require special inspection or testing of the Work in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Docu- ments, whether or not such Work be then fabricated, in- stalled or completed. . 1.5.13 The Architect shall review and approve or take other appropriate action upon the Contractor's submittals such as Shop Drawings, Product Data and Samples, but only for conformance with the design concept of the Work and with the information given in. the Contract Documents. Such action shall be taken with reasonable promptness so as to cause no delay. The Architect's ap- proval of a specific item shall not indicate approval of an assembly Of which the item is a component. 1.5.14 The Architect shall prepare Change Orders for the Owner's approval and execution in accordance with the Contract Documents, and shall have authority to order minor changes in the Work not involving an adjustment, in the Contract Sum or an extension of the Contract Time which are not inconsistent with the intent of the Contract Documents. 1.5.15 The Architect shall conduct inspections to deter- mine the Dates of Substantial Completion and final com- pletion, shall receive and forward to - the Owner for the Owner's review written warranties and related documents required by the Contract Documents and assembled by the Contractor, and shall issue a final Certificate for Pay- ment. 1.5.16 The extent of the duties, responsibilities and lim- itations of authority of the Architect as the Owner's rep- resentative during construction shall not be modified or extended without written consent of the Owner, the Con- tractor and the Architect. 1.6 PROJECT REPRESENTATION BEYOND BASIC SERVICES 1.6.1 If the Owner and Architect agree that more ex- tensive - representation at the site than is described in Paragraph 1.5 shall be provided, the Architect shall pro- vide one or more Project Representatives to assist the Architect in carrying out such responsibilities at the site. 1.6.2 Such Project Representatives shall be selected, em- ployed and directed by the Architect, and the Architect shall be compensated therefor as mutually agreed be- tween the Owner and the Architect as set forth' in an ex- hibit appended to this Agreement, which shall describe the duties, responsibilities and limitations of authority of such Project Representatives. 1.6.3 Through the observations by such Project Repre- sentatives, the Architect shall endeavor to . provide further protection for the Owner against defects and deficiencies in the Work, but the furnishing of such project representa- tion shall not modify the rights, responsibilities or obliga- tions of the Architect as described in Paragraph 1.5. 1.7 ADDITIONAL SERVICES The following Services are not included in Basic Services unless so identified in Article 15. They shall be provided if authorized or confirmed in writing by the Owner, and they shall be paid for by the Owner as provided in this Agreement, in addition to the compensation for Basic Services. AIA DOCUMENT 1141 • OWNER-ARCHITECT AGREEMENT • THIRTEENTH EDITION • JULY 19'7 • AIAe • m 1977 4 8141 -1977 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE Of ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 1.7.1 Providing analyses of the . Owner's needs, and pro- gramming the requirements of the Project. 1.7.2 Providing financial feasibility or other special studies. 1.73 Providing planning surveys, site evaluations, envi- ronmental studies or comparative studies of prospective sites, and preparing. special surveys, studies and submis- sions required for approvals of governmental authorities or others having jurisdiction over the Project. 1.7.4 Providing services relative to future facilities, sys- tems and equipment which are not intended to be con- structed during the Construction Phase. 1.7.S Providing services to investigate existing conditions or facilities or to make measured drawings thereof, -or to verify the accuracy of drawings or other information Iur- nished by the Owner. 1.7.6 Preparing documents of alternate, separate or sequential bids or providing extra services in connection with bidding, negotiation. or construction prior to. the completion of the Construction Documents Phase, when requested by the Owner. 1.7.7 Providing coordination of Work. performed by separate contractors or by the Owner's own forces. 1.7.8 . Providing services in connection with the work of a construction manager or separate consultants retained by the Owner. 1.7.9 Providing Detailed Estimates of Construction Cost, analyses of owning and operating costs, or detailed quan- tity surveys or inventories of material, equipment and labor. 1.7.10 Providing interior design and other similar ser- vices required for or in connection with the selection, procurement or installation of furniture, furnishings and related equipment. 1.7.11 Providing services for planning tenant or rental spaces. 1.7.12 Making revisions in Drawings, Specifications or other documents when such, revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instructions previously given, are required by the enactment or revision of codes, laws or regulations subsequent to the preparation of such doc- uments or are due to other causes not solely within the control of the Architect. 1.7.13 Preparing Drawings, Specifications and supporting data and providing other services in connection with Change Orders to the extent that the adjustment in the Basic Compensation resulting from the adjusted Con- struction Cost is not commensurate with the services re- quired Of the Architect, provided such Change Orders are required by causes not solely within the control of the Architect. 1.7.14 Making investigations, surveys, valuations, inven- tories or detailed appraisals of existing facilities, and serv- ices required in connection with construction performed by the Owner. 1.7.115 Providing consultation concerning replacement of any Work damaged by fire or other cause during con- struction, and furnishing services as may be required in connection with the replacement of such Work. 1.7.16 Providing services made necessary by the default of the Contractor, or by major defects or deficiencies in the Work of the Contractor, or by failure of performance of either the Owner or Contractor under the Contract for Construction. 1.7.17 Preparing a set of reproducible record drawings showing significant changes in the Work made during construction based On marked -up prints, drawings and other data furnished by the Contractor to the Architect. 1.7.18 Providing extensive assistance in the utilization of any equipment or system such as initial start-up or testing, adjusting and balancing, preparation of operation and maintenance manuals, training personnel for operation and maintenance, and consultation during operation. 1.7.19 Providing services after issuance to the Owner of the final Certificate for Payment, or in the absence of a final Certificate for Payment, more than sixty days after the Date of Substantial Completion of the Work. 1.7.20 Preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any public hearing, arbitration pro- ceeding or legal proceeding. 1.7.21 Providing services of consultants for other than the normal architectural, structural, mechanical and elec- trical engineering services for the Project. 1.7.22 Providing any other services not otherwise in- cluded in this Agreement or not customarily furnished in accordance with generally accepted architectural practice. 1.8 TIME 1.8.1 The Architect shall perform Basic and Additional Services as expeditiously as is consistent with professional skill and care and the orderly progress of the Work. Upon request of the Owner, the Architect shall submit for the Owner's approval, a schedule for the performance of the Architect's services which shall be adjusted as required as the Project proceeds, and shall include allowances for peri- ods of time required for the Owner's review and approval of submissions and for approvals of authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. This schedule, when approved by the Owner, shall not, except for reasonable cause, be exceeded by the Architect. ARTICLE 2 THE OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 The Owner shall provide full information regarding requirements for th'e Project including a program, which shall set forth the Owner's design objectives, constraints and criteria, including space requirements and relation- ships, flexibility and expandability, special equipment and systems and site requirements. 2.2 If the Owner provides a budget for the Project it shall include contingencies for bidding, changes in the Work during construction, and other costs which are the responsibility of the Owner, including those described in this Article 2 and in Subparagraph 3.1.2. The Owner shall, at the request of the Architect, provide a statement of funds available for the Project, and their source. AIA DOCUMENT 1141 • OWNER - ARCHITECT AGREEMENT • THIRTEENTH EDITION • JULY 1977 + N IAO • ®1977 8141 -1977 5 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE Of ARCHITECTS, 173S NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON D.C. 2O W6 2.3 The Owner shall designate, when necessary, a rep- resentative authorized to act in the Owner's behalf with respect to the Project. The owner or such authorized representative shall examine the documents submitted by the Architect and shall render decisions pertaining thereto promptly, to avoid unreasonable delay in the. progress of the Architect's services. 2.4 The Owner shall furnish a legal description and a certified land survey of the site, giving, as applicable, grades and. lines of streets, alleys, pavements and adjoin- ing property; rights-of-way, restrictions, easements, en- croachments, zoning, deed restrictions, boundaries and contours of the site; locations, dimensions and complete data pertaining to existing buildings, other improvements and trees; and full information concerning available serv- ice and utility lines both public and private, above and below grade, including inverts and depths. 2.S The Owner shall furnish the services of soil engi- neers or other consultants when such services are deemed necessary by the Architect. Such services shall include test borings, test pits, soil bearing values, percolation tests, air and water pollution tests, ground corrosion and resistivity tests, including necessary operations for determining sub- soil, air and water conditions, with reports and appropri- ate professional recommendations. 2.6 The Owner shall furnish structural, mechanical, chemical and other laboratory tests, inspections .and re- ports as required by law or the Contract Documents. 2.7 The Owner shall furnish all legal, accounting and in- surance counseling services as may be necessary at any time for the Project, including such auditing services as the Owner may require to verify the Contractor's Applica- tions for Payment or to ascertain how or for what pur- poses the Contractor uses the moneys paid by or on be- half of the Owner. 2.8 The services, information, surveys and reports re- quired by Paragraphs 2.4 through 2.7 inclusive shall be furnished at the Owner's expense, and the Architect shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness thereof. 2.9 If the Owner observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project or nonconformance with the Contract Documents, prompt written notice thereof shall be given by the Owner to the Architect. 2.10 The Owner shall furnish required information and services and shall render approvals and decisions as ex- peditiously as necessary for the orderly progress of the Architect's services and of the Work. ARTICLE 3 CONSTRUCTION COST 3.1 DEFINITION 3.1.1 The Construction Cost shall be the total cost or estimated cost to the Owner of a.11 elements of the Project designed or specified by the Architect. 3.1.2 The Construction Cost shall include at current market rates, including a reasonable allowance for over- head and profit, the cost of labor and materials furnished by the Owner and any equipment which has been de- signed, specified, selected or specially provided for by the Architect. 3.1.3 Construction Cost does not include the compein- sation of the Architect and the Architect's consultants, the cost of the land, rights -of -way, or other costs which are the responsibility of the Owner as provided in Arti- cle 2. 3.2 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 3.2.1 Evaluations of the Owners Project budget, State- ments of Probable Construction Cost and Detailed Estimates of Construction Cost, if . any, prepared by the Architect, represent the Architect's best judgment as a design professional familiar with the construction indus- try.' It is recognized, however, that neither the Architect nor the Owner has control over the cost of labor, mate- rials or equipment, over the Contractor's methods of de- termining bid prices, or over competitive bidding, market or negotiating conditions. Accordingly, the Architect cannot and does not warrant or represent that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from the Project budget proposed, established or approved by the Owner, if any, or from any Statement of Probable Construction Cost or other cost estimate or evaluation prepared by the Archi- tect. 3.2.2 No fixed limit of Construction Cost shall be estab- lished as a condition of this Agreement by the furnishing, proposal or establishment of a Project budget under Sub- paragraph 1.1.2 or Paragraph 2.2 or otherwise, unless such fixed limit has been agreed upon in writing and signed by the parties hereto. If such a fixed limit has been estab- lished, the Architect shall be permitted to include con- tingencies for design, bidding and price escalation, to de- termine what materials, equipment, component systems and types of construction are to be included in the Con- tract Documents, to make reasonable adjustments in the scope of the Project and to include in the Contract Docu- ments alternate bids to adjust the Construction Cost to the fixed limit. Any such fixed limit shall be increased in the amount of any increase in the Contract Sum occurring after execution of the Contract for Construction. 3.2.3 If the Bidding or Negotiation Phase has not com- menced within three months after the Architect submits the Construction Documents to the Owner, any Project budget or fixed limit of Construction Cost shall be ad- justed to reflect any change in the general level of prices in the construction industry between the date of submis- sion of the Construction Documents to the Owner and the date on which proposals are sought. 3.2.4 If a Project budget or fixed Limit of Construction Cost (adjusted as provided in Subparagraph 3.2.3) is ex- ceeded by the lowest bona fide bid or negotiated pro- posal, the Owner shall (1) give written approval of an increase in such fixed limit,. (2). authorize rebidding or re- negotiating of the Project within a reasonable time, (3) if the Project is abandoned, terminate in accordance with Paragraph 10.2, or (4) cooperate in revising the Project scope and quality as required to reduce the Construction Cost. In the case of (4), provided a fixed limit of Construc- tion Cost has been established as a condition of this Agree- ment, the. Architect, without additional charge, shall mod- ify the Drawings and Specifications as necessary to comply AIA DOCUMENT 8141 • OWNER - ARCHITECT AGREEMENT • THIRTEENTH EDITION • ►ULY 1977 • AIAO • ®1977 6 3141 -1977 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 with the fixed limit. The providing Of such service shall be the limit of the Architect's responsibility arising from the establishment of such fixed limit, and having done. so, the Architect shall be entitled to compensation for all services performed, in accordance with this Agreement, whether or not the Construction Phase is commenced. ARTICLE 4 DIRECT PERSONNEL EXPENSE 4.1 Direct Personnel Expense is defined as the direct sal- aries of all the Architect's personnel engaged on the Proj- ect, and the portion of the cost of their mandatory and customary contributions and benefits related thereto, such as employment taxes and other statutory employee bene- fits, insurance, sick leave, holidays, vacations, pensions and similar contributions and benefits. ARTICLE 5 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES S.1 Reimbursable Expenses are in addition to the Com- pensation for Basic and Additional Services and include actual expenditures made by the Architect and the Archi- tect's employees and consultants in the interest of the Project for the expenses listed in the following Sub- paragraphs: 5.1.1 Expense of transportation in connection with the Project; living expenses in connection with out -of -town travel; long distance communications, and fees paid for securing approval of authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. 5.1.2 Expense of reproductions, postage and handling of Drawings, Specifications and other documents, excluding reproductions for the office use of the Architect and the Architect's consultants. 5.1.3. Expense of data processing and photographic pro- duction techniques when used in connection with Addi- .tionai Services. SAA If authorized in advance by the Owner, expense of overtime work requiring higher than regular rates. SA.5 Expense of renderings, models and mock -ups re- quested by the Owner. 5.1.6 Expense of any additional insurance coverage or limits, including professional liability insurance, requested by the Owner in excess of that normally carried by the Architect and the Architect's consultants. ARTICLE 6 PAYMENTS TO THE ARCHITECT 6.1 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF BASIC SERVICES 6.1.1 An initial payment as set forth in Paragraph 14.1 is the minimum payment under this Agreement. 6.1.2 Subsequent payments for Basic Services shalt be made monthly and shall be in proportion to services per- formed within each Phase of services, on the basis set forth in Article 14. 61.3 If and to the extent that the Contract Time - initially established in the Contract for Construction is exceeded or extended through no-fault of the Architect, compensa- tion for any Basic Services required for such extended period of Administration of the Construction Contract shall be computed as set forth in Paragraph 14.4 for Addi- tional Services. 6.1.4 When compensation is based on a percentage of Construction Cost, and any portions of the Project are deleted or otherwise not constructed, compensation for such portions of the Project shall be payable to the extent services are performed on such portions, in accordance with the schedule set forth in Subparagraph 14.2.2, based on (1) the lowest bona fide bid or negotiated proposal or, (2) if no such bid or proposal is received, the most recent Statement of Probable Construction Cost or Detailed Esti- mate of Construction Cost for such portions of the Project. 6.2 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES 6.2.1 Payments on account of the Architect's Additional Services as defined in Paragraph 1.7 and for Reimbursable Expenses as defined in Article 5 shall be made monthly upon presentation of the Architect's statement of services rendered or expenses incurred. 6.3 PAYMENTS WITHHELD 6.3.1 No deductions shall be made from the Architect's compensation On account of penalty, liquidated damages or .other sums withheld from payments to contractors, or on account of the cost of changes in . the Work other than those for which the Architect is held legally liable. 6.4 PROJECT SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION 6.4.1 If the Project is suspended or abandoned in whole .or in part for more than three months, the Architect shall be compensated for all services performed prior to receipt of written notice from the Owner of such suspension or abandonment, together with Reimbursable Expenses then due and all Termination Expenses as defined in Paragraph 10.4. if the Project is resumed after being suspended for more than three months, the Architect's compensation shall be equitably adjusted. ARTICLE 7 ARCHITECT'S ACCOUNTING RECORDS 7.1 Records of Reimbursable Expenses and expenses per- taining to Additional Services and services performed on the basis of a Multiple of Direct Personnel Expense shall be kept on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles and shall be available to the Owner or the Owner's authorized representative at mutually convenient t mes. ARTICLE 8 OWNERSHIP AND USE OF DOCUMENTS 8.1 Drawings and Specifications as instruments of serv- ice are and shall remain the property of the Architect whether the Project for which they are made is executed or not. The Owner shall be permitted to retain copies, in- cluding reproducible copies, of Drawings and Specifica- tions for information and reference in connection with the Owner's use and occupancy of the Project. The Drawings and Specifications shall not be used by the Owner on AIA DOCUMENT 8111 • OWNER•ARCHITECT.AGREEMENT • THIRTEENTH EDITION • JULY , • IA0 • 1977 8141 -1977 7 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE Of ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 10006 other projects, for additions to this Project, or for comple- tion. of this Project by others provided the Architect is not in default under this Agreement, except by agreement in writing and with appropriate compensation to the Archi- tect. , 8.2 Submission or distribution to meet official regulatory requirements or for other purposes in connection with the Project is not to be construed as publication in derogation of the Architect's rights. ARTICLE 9 ARBITRATION 9.1 All claims, disputes and other matters in question between the parties to this Agreement, arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, shall be decided by arbitration in accordance with the Construc- tion Industry Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitra- tion Association then obtaining unless the parties mutu- ally agree otherwise. No arbitration, arising out of or re- lating to this Agreement, shall include, by consolidation, joinder or in any other manner, any additional person not a party to this .Agreement except by written consent con- taining a specific reference to this Agreement and signed by the Architect, the Owner, and any other person sought to be. joined. Any consent to arbitration involving an ad- ditional person or persons shall not constitute consent to arbitration of any dispute not described therein or with any person not named or described therein. This Agree- ment to arbitrate and any agreement to arbitrate with an additional person or persons duly consented to by the parties to this Agreement shall be specifically enforceable under the prevailing arbitration law. 9.2 Notice of the demand for arbitration shall be filed in writing with the other party to this Agreement and with the American Arbitration' Association. The demand shall be made within a reasonable time after the claim, dispute or other. matter in question has arisen. In no event shall the demand for arbitration be made after the date when institution of legal or equitable proceedings based on such claim, dispute or other matter in question would be barred by the applicable statute of limitations. 9.3 The award rendered by the arbitrators shall be final, and judgment may be entered upon it in accordance with applicable law in any court having jurisdiction thereof. ARTICLE 10 TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven days' written notice should the other party fail substantially to perform in accordance with its terms through no fault of the party initiating the termination. 10.2 This Agreement may be terminated by the Owner upon at least seven days' written notice to the Architect in the event that the Project is permanently abandoned. 10.3 In the event of termination not the fault of the Ar- chitect, the Architect shall be compensated for all services performed to termination date, together with Reimburs- able Expenses then due and all Termination Expenses as defined in Paragraph 10.4. 10.4 Termination Expenses include expenses directly at- tributable to termination for which the Architect is not otherwise compensated, plus an amount computed as a percentage of the total Basic and Additionai Compensa- tion earned to the time of termination, as follows: A 20 percent if termination occurs during the Sche- matic Design Phase; or . .2 10 percent if termination occurs during the Design Development Phase; or .3 5 percent if termination occurs during any subse- quent phase. ARTICLE 11 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 11.1 Unless otherwise specified, this Agreement shall be governed by the law of the principal place of business of the Architect. 11.2 Terms in this Agreement shall have the same mean- ing as those in AIA Document A201, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, current as of the date of this Agreement. 11.3 As between the parties to this Agreement: as to all acts or failures to act by either party to this Agreement, any applicable statute of limitations shall commence to run and any alleged cause of action shall be deemed to have accrued in any and all events not later than the rele- vant Date of Substantial Completion of the Work, and as to any acts or failures to act occurring after the relevant Date of Substantial Completion, not later than the date of issuance of the final Certificate for Payment. 11.4 The Owner and the Architect waive all rights against each other and against the contractors, consult- ants, .agents and employees of the other for damages cov- ered by any property insurance during construction as set forth in the edition of AIA Document A201, General Con- ditions, current as -of the date of this Agreement. The Owner and the Architect each shall require appropriate similar waivers from their contractors, consultants and agents. ARTICLE 12 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS 12.1 The Owner and the Architect, respectively, bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners, successors, assigns and legal representa- tives of such other party with respect to all covenants of this Agreement. Neither the Owner nor the Architect shall assign, sublet or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. ARTICLE 13 EXTENT OF AGREEMENT 13.1 This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the Owner and the Architect and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agree- ments, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both Owner and Architect. AIA DOCUMENT 8141 OWNER- ARCHITECT AGREEMENT • THIRTEENTH EDITION • JULY 1977 • AIAS • 01977 8 8141 -19" THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE Of ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 ARTICLE 14 BASIS OF. COMPENSATION P The Owner shall compensate the Architect for the Scope of Services provided, in accordance with Article 6, Payments . to the Architect, and the other Terms and Conditions of this Agreement, as follows: 14.1 AN INITIAL PAYMENT. of Zero dollars ($ 0.00 ) shall be made . upon p on execution of this Agreement and credited to the Owner's account as follows: 14.2 BASIC COMPENSATION 14.2 .1 FOR BASIC SERVICES, as described in Paragraphs 1.1 through 1.5, and any other services included in Article 15 as part of Basic Services, Basic Compensation shall be computed as follows: (Here insert basis of compensation, including fixed amounts, multiples or percentages, and identify Phases to which particular methods of compensa- tion .apply, if necessary.) Basic services as described in this Agreement will be provided on a time basis at a multiple of 2.75 times Direct Personnel Expense. Invoices wi l 1 be submitted on a monthly basis. Payment will be due within y 30 days of recei P t of invoice. Each invoice will include a complete breakdown of all Direct Personnel and Reimbursable Expenses* 1 4 .2. P 2 Where compensation is based on a Stipulated Sum or . Percentage of Construction Cost, payments for Basic Services shall be made as provided in Subparagraph 6.1.2, so that Basic Compensation for each Phase shall equal the following percentages.of the total Basic Compensation payable: (Not appl i cable ) (Include any additional Phases as appropriate.) Schematic Design Phase: Sche g 22,000 30,000 percent( 15 %) percent (20 %) Design Development Phase. Construction Documents Phase: 609000 percent ( 40 %) ' or Negotiation Phase: 6, In g g 71,500 29 250 percent 5 %) percent 20 %) ( Construction Phase. Total 148 14.3 FOR PROJECT REPRESENTATION BEYOND BASIC SERVICES, as described in Paragraph 1.6, Compensation shall be computed separately in accordance with Subparagraph 1.6.2. AIA DOCUMENT 3141 • OWNER- ARCHITECT AGREEMENT • THIRTEENTH EDITION • JULY 1977 0 AIA's 0 m 1977 6141_19 9 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 10006 • r . 14.4 COMPENSATION FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES 14.4.1 FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF THE ARCHITECT, as described in Paragraph 1.7, and any other services in- cluded in Article 15 as part of Additional Services, but excluding Additional Services Of consultants, Compen- sation shall be computed as follows: (Here insert basis of compensation, including rates and /or multiples of Direct Personnel Expense for Principals and employees, and identify Principals and classify employees, if required. Identify specific services to which particular methods of compensation apply, if necessary.) Additional servi ces wi 11 be provided on a time basis at a multiple of 2.75 times the Direct Personnel Expense of those individuals required to accomplish the additional services* 14.4.2 FO R ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF CONSULTANTS, including additional structural, mechanical and electrical g en S ineerin services and those provided under Subparagraph 1.7.21 or identified in Article 15 as part of Add1 } ,f tional Services, a multiple of one ( 100 times the amounts belled to the Architect for such services. (identify specific types of consultants in Article 75, it required.) 14.5 FOR REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES, as described in Article 5 and any other items included in Article 15 as Reim bursable Expenses, a multiple of one ( 110 ) times the amounts ex- pended by the Architect, the Architect's employees and consultants in the interest of the Project. 14.6 Payments due the Architect and unpaid under this Agreement shall bear interest from the date payment is due at the rate entered below, or in the absence thereof, at the legal rate prevailing at the principal place of business of the Architect. (not applicable) (Here insert any rate of interest agreed upon.) (usury aws and requirements under the federal Truth in tending Act, similar state and local consumer credit law% and other regulations at the y Owner and Architect's principal places of b the location of the Project and elsewhere may affect the validity of this provision Specific legal usiness, advice should be obtained with respect to deletion, modification, or other requirements such as written disclosures or waivers ) 14.7 The Owner and the Architect agree in accordance with the Terms and Conditions of this Agreement that: 14.7.1 IF THE SCOPE of the Project or of the Architect's Services is changed materially, the amounts of compensation shall be equitably adjusted. 14.72 IF THE SERVICES covered by this Agreement have not been completed within eighteen g� months of t he g h date hereof, thr no fault of the Architect, the amounts of compensation, rates and • Q, multiples set forth herein shall be equitably adjusted. AIA DOCUMENT 9141 • OWNER - ARCHITECT AGREEMENT • THIRTEENTH EDITION • JULY 1977 • AIAS • © 1 10 6141 -1977 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASH O.C. V j` ARTICLE 15 OTHER CONDITIONS OR SERVICES • services to be - 15.1 Basic professional provided by Architectural Alliance s P under this Agreement are as follows: 1. Architecture 2. Structural Engineering 3, Mechani Engineering 4. Electrical Engineering The 'professional services of the following consulting engineering firms wi 1 y l be utilized b the architect as part of its basic services: S tructural En 9 i neeri ng Meyer, 6orgman and Johnson, Inc. Mi nneapol i s , Minnesota • 1 Lundquist, Mechanical and Electr�ca i st, Wi lmar, Schultz and q Engineering Martin, Inc. St. Paul, Minnesota 15.2 The archiitects fee sha l l not include items furnished and installed by 'the Owner consisting of (1) Radio Equipment, (2) Special Security De vices if any),, 3 Draperies, (4) Loose Furniture and Eq uipment. These items shall be furnished, scheduled and instal 1 ed. by the Owner. • din between the Owner and-the arch i.tect that 15.3 It �s the understanding the construction cost of the project is estimated to be approximate 1 y 10 $2,250,000 9 not including land purchase costs, professional fees and _ ex costs, expenses, furnishings, equipments pmen, tests ng and soi boring p topographic survey and other non-building costs. 15.4 Automobile 'Mileage shall .be computed 3t the rate of (0..20) cents per mile. AIA DOCUMENT 8141 • OWNER•ARCHiTECT AGREEMENT • THIRTEENTH EDITION • DULY 977 ' I A O.C. ®1 00 7 B141-1977 11 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 173S NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTO This Agreement entered into as of the day and year first-writt6n above. OWNER ARCHITECT Architectural All Inc. 400 Clifton Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 554 BY BY AlA DOCUMENT 8141 • OWNER- ARCHITECT AGREEMENT • THIRTEENTH EDITION • JULY 1977 • AIAO • ®1977 12 9141 -1977 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 1 Act an bar G ,......., , .� t . MEMORANDUM 4!r A T OO Ci �� T FROM: Assistant City. Engineer 1 ''�e_ ,----- .��.�__�.. SUBJECT: Water Main Petition, Ripley Avenue at Edgerton DATE: January 4,.1985 The attached petition is incomplete. The sponsor, however, requests the city y council to consider installation of water main in Ripley Avenue from Edgerton Street to approximately 530 feet west. The sponsor is considering development of the southern segment of the Granada Addition. A condition of preliminary plat approval of Gr anada Addition i,s that water main must be ordered for Ripley Avenue prior to development of the southern segment. A previous project (Y project cit 80 -3) proceeded to the letting of bids stage for . Ripley ' � Avenue water main, however, the previous developer of the parcel failed to agree to cost .sharing agreements and the project was cancelled and closed. The attached map shows the requested water main. It is recommended the city council authorize a feasibility study to investigate the cost and engineering feasibility of .water main on Ripley Avenue west of Edger ton Street . W e, 9 the . undersigned, do hereby petition the Council of the City of Maplewood to: r �% i•� . (1l �eo� /77 d in o A � y I certi that I have witnessed the above signatures, and the proposed improvements were discussed with the signers. �c DATE PETITION SPONSOR .:)-36R and that the said improvement be undertaken by the Village Council in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429; and that the cost thereof be assessed against benefi tted property as provided by said Chapter 429. OWNER STREET ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT- DATE AGE L ROSELAWN AVE. 1-Z co 0 I-= 0 co w 0 Z O W C7 O W J 3 3 I Proposed 8 i Existing 8 t. P. w PROJECT 80 -3: WATERMAIN IN RIPLEY FROM EDGERTON ST. UTILITIES MAP Scale: . i" = 200' Date: 8- 14-80 N RESOLUTION -- CALLING FOR PRELIMINARY PLANS WHEREAS, The City Council has proposed that the area described as: Ripley Avenue west of Edgerton Street be improved by construction of water main, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the proposed improvement be referred to the City Engineer, who is hereby instructed to report to the - Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and should best be made as proposed, and the estimated cost of the improvement. as recommended. MEMORANDUM TO: City . Manager FROM: Assistant City .Engineer SUBJECT: Preparation of Feasibility Study of Connor Avenue Construction DATE: January 4, 1985 The city council previously entered into. an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, and private property owners, Hess Kline and ,lean Parranto for the construction of a temporary connection between T.H. 61 and Maplewood Drive East (the Frontage Road) south of the Datsun. dealership. The agreement states that the City of Maplewood shall construct Connor Avenue ( located immediately north of the Datsun dealership) between T.H. 61 and Maplewood Drive by December 31; 1986, at which time the Department of Transportation will remove the temporary connection. It is recommended that the city council adopt the attached. resolution ordering the preparation of a feasibility study. This will be a council - initiated project- and thus will require a 4 -1 approval. ti RESOLUTION --ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY K WHEREAS, the city council has previously entered into.an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transpor- tation, and private property onwers, Hess Kline and Jean E. Paranto, calling for the improvement of the area north of the Datsun dealership by _construction of Connor Avenue between T.H. 61 and Maplewood Drive. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY. THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: That proposed improvement be referred to the City Engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasibible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended* � -3 d+ MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: Request City Manager Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner Appeal . of Concrete Curb Replacement 325 Roselawn Avenue Keith Holm St. Paul Board of Realtors Office Bu ilding December 26 1984. E l r q -.• `_ j Rejec -t..e �.�. Dat e _ Appeal of the review board's requirement for continuous concrete curbing. Past Ac 5- 22 -84: The board approved building design and site plans for this developments. Condition number five requ i red that If areas shall be striped and paved and all bituminous areas shall have continuous concrete curbing. ". 8 -9 -84: The building permit was issued. The planning office's condition was that the "applicant must obey all design review board requirements from the enclosed 5 -22 -84 approval." The applicant then installed bituminmous curbing, rather than concrete. Refer to the letter on page 6. 11 -27 -84 The review board considered an appeal from the applicant to be allowed to use the bituminous curbing already installed. The board amended condition number five to read - - "the board accepts the bituminous .curbing as installed, which shall be inspected. by staff every year* After five years the curbing shall be replaced with continuous concrete curbing, regardless of the condition of the bituminous curb." Past Action (other development) 6-7-79: Council modified an appeal by Big A Auto Parts to have the concrete. curbing requirement waived. The applicant's request was based on financial reasons. The council's amendment to the.condition permitted asphalt curbing along the rear and half of the south edges of the parking lot. The remainder was to be concrete. Comments in an attempt to permit the applicant to get some use out of their investment of bituminous curbing, the board amortized it over a five year period.. The board felt that within five years, the bituminous curbing would have deteriorated to a state warranting repair or replacement. This is a very reasonable position, considering that concrete curbing was originally required. Recommendation No change to the board's amended condition of requiring the installation of continuous concrete curbing after five years. jW Attachments 1. Location map 2. Property line /zoning map 3. Site plan 4. Applicant's letter dated 11 -6 -84 2 36 ---- ' LARK �V.E�.�, . • i . . LITTLE 49 LE CANADA , AURlE RD I 35 25 a t CQV « • w 4 N ELDRIDGE N Sandy < F KLMONT*' LA, Loke :Ki o v e !i AV L ; M T z W W W 0 VE O NON AVE. p an �0 MT. RNON AVE r DOWNS AVE. � _ wov W, Ll W � 1 28 _ W z W RO SELAwN •. AVE. o F e f AV. LWOOD AVE. •E � 3 0 [ SUMMER AVE -d FEN TON AVE _ O C ,,,�, = 4 Cr T W PAPLEY AV E _ y ' I 0 J H = W 10 I .: ,� < • ° _ o I KINGS= < �, 2 z KING l v / ( ID� AVE 3V ° ` m 3 W io .. • , �1ii.r _.._ T n �S f1 i Ar7 / 01 . LOCATION MAP Attachment One N 3 Qa. 24 24 V) w_ _ �dD �2 9 ZZ 1 1 to t FPAIKSIDE - -- _ ,FIRE STATIO ,9 L J ' ;7 rl ( � ► � 1 44, — — --- - now, V E.R t,�4 ON 19 7 { NCR ,9 --- - • 1967 /90 .,_ s 4 wum win - a -;-'� 1961_ , 3 • r A Oelod, 4 2 4 T ti 2 4 1957 9 V 1. v ..S3av WN p" � Z2 ` 9-4 4- �v`0 z Z _ LO 0 f02 l LAJ MR. STEAK � 14 17 • s - H3� -- t; r 1 S W b y -ft oft Iwo a- low ac .l ' 300 . 314 320 328 334 - 1 -912 1 : _ C HURC L6 ) am , t r l T r 1 n -- --�- PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 Attachment Two 4 N i • • 1% • • • • • • ; • adlac.ent R1 toning • •• V ol : • • a •1 ob LAS 2; 4b • •,� .� Ile • `P, ■srss.'t'ssss.ss■.srsssr.rrrl ssssssssassssssrsssssrssssss .ss *��rit�fi���• 1• ti ■ ■ 1 ; ' ■ .jam . + -•8 +.: • • t •r • w j$ 046 •. L I► as ■ 1 t 1► * 1 •ir •� • • 1 ■ +_ a .� ■ ftb "b qb ■ + 4b f pt pe y lint • a _ •..r — ....3 ...,..ttt •' • t - ■ . pa inp selback ; 00-0%. f 04 "' _ DO? • t • ■. a bulling a #1 ack ♦ i i�•+• • • f ST FF AR I • 9021 L ' aD�. • 1 ■ .'. f • - • i • • us V S N1SJTQR PARKING ••. . ,,, � p - `rc ■ f 4C 43 1A 1 t N tom+ �r•Zrs.: r►,:Sr.. f f • Z i ; PROPOSED BUILDING < —� .•6♦ 1 nLIgL i i f • _ _ �� 1�[ 1 , - ...-vz ' — • . � » ' , • ?' • f . ' � +1 '� � �, ��4 3 � ►111 •. : �1� � 1 � • . � if - foot build i n setback �- --� -- .�- -- -- -- '- -'=�. ' -= Joe CV Ktl Qj tD ur W J 20 _ foot i andsca n setback —. �-=''� -.� `� PROPERTY LINE - - P 9 � . — . - _ -_- L: T1 ■• sssssssssssis rsss�rs♦rssssssssr■ sss 1001100000 a now • 9 ' ( !fir ! • • f • 1 3.8 FEET O t goo 41P LLJ mob LL— 16 0 or we 11 • i I • • ♦ f • • .► • ar op do dOo' alp r _or • ♦ • • • ROSELAWN A VENUE . -- CENTER LINE Ir 7 w � � -�•�� .•ice- • i �- .�j. -�.�. ` L S .a � j rte_ SITE PLAN 5 Attachment Three 4 N t ra�erty ra erty mikutowski roney 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTS 6 November 1984 Mr. Thomas Eks trand Associate Planner City of Maplewood 1902 E. County Road B .Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear !4r. Ekstrand: 352 WACOUTA STREET ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 612 /224 -4831 In the last week, it has come to, our attention that the building for the St. Paul Area Board of Realtors is required to have concrete curbing at its parking area, As you are aware this building and its parking area are now nearly 100% comp l e`te Our specifications, details, and drawings did not call for concrete curbing. We have evidently missed thi requirement that Maplewood has placed on the building and evidently Maplewood's plan reviews also missed this item. The situation is unfortunate, however, I would request that Maplewood waive this requirement. The expenses involved to the owner would be considerable to cut back the existing new sod and park surfaces and install the curbs now. This request is submitted on behalf of the St. Paul Area Board of Realtors. it is made -with their knowledge of the circumstances and their understanding of differences in. quality and performance between concrete and bi tuminous curbing. Please contact me at your convenience regarding this matter. We would like to resolve this remai ning item and satisfy both Maplewood and the owner' concerns. Sincerely, RAFFERTY RAFF Y t UTOWSKI RONEY AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Craig E. ferty, AIA�,,� CER :kt xc: Keith Holm R Naugh ton Attahmentfour A. St. Paul Board of Realtors. Curbing Appeal r.KeUh Holm, executive vice president of the St. Paul board of Read r to s�, said they were unaware of the city requirement for concrete curbing and did install bituminous curbing around the parking lot. The are aski at waiver to They be able to keep the bi curbi This was an oversight orl part. Secretary Ekstrand said the concrete curbing as been re wi red because it 8 q wi hold up much better than ,bitumi nous curbing. g Board Member Juker suggested that the board let the bituminous curbin in g as long -as it is in but check it out periodically. When the curbing begins to show wear at that time replace it with concrete curbing. Boin rd Member Rossbach agreed with that procedure. Possibl y a time l imit of 3 or 5 years could be applied. Secretary Ekstrand said he could check the ual i t of the curbi periodically, ' q y g pe iod�cally. Mr. Holm said they are trying to work with the city to have ' Y S y ve the building and site comply city requirements. The board indicated they were concerned with setting a P recedent if the bituminous curbing would be permi even on a limited—time basis. Secretary Ekstrand i ndi cated that at the time the building permit ..:was issued, the applicant/contractor was informed to comply with all board conditions. A co of those conditions were given out with the permi He i ndi cated some form of escrow would be required to issue a certificate of occupanc P Y for the items not completed on the site. Board Member Juker moved the board accept the bituminous curbing s ins g a led, which is to be checked by staff once a year When staff feels that the bituminous curbing needs repair, it will have to be replaced with the concrete curbing, g Board Member Rossbach seconded Ayes -- Members Rossbach, Juker Nays -- Members Peterso4 and Moe Motion failed Board Member Rossbach moved the Board accept the bituminous curbing as installed, which is to be checked by staff each year. After five years the curbing shall be replaced with concrete curbing regardless of condition of the bituminous curbing. Board Member Juker seconded Ayes -- Members Rossbach, Juker, Moe Nays -- Member Peterson Motion carries MEMORANDUM To: Barry Evans, City Manager From: Robert D. Odegard , Director of Community Service p� - Y ...�._.._ Date: January 3, 1985 Sub j : Park Acqu i s i t.i on Charge For Neighborhood Parks Per Maplewood Code Sec. 21-46, 21-47, 21 -48 Maplewood City'Code Sec. 21 -56 (a) states: "The City at its first regular meeting of each calendar year, shall act to adopt by resolution, the average acre acqui sition cost and the average acre development cost for neighborhood parks throughout the City. The Park and Recreation Commission at its December 17, 1984, meeting di scUssed the neighborhood charge with the following notion: "Commissioner Christianson moved that the Park and Recreation Commission recommends the City Council establish an average acquisition acre cost increase to $4,775 and the average acre development cost continue at $7,500; seconded by Commissioner Janisch. With the acquisition cost per acre increased from the present $4,200 to.the recommended $4,775, the impact would be to increase the average costs per acre per person from $79.50 to $85.25. This will increase the neighborhood P.A.C. charge for the average home of 4.1 occupants from the present .$326 to $349.53 per family dwelling. Please find attached the copy of the memorandum of December 12, 1984, reviewing the information prepared by staff for the Park and Recreation Commission meeting. Enc. (1) MEMORAI To: From: Date: Subj: VDUM Park and Recreation Commission Members Robert D. Odegard, Director of Community Services. December 12, 1984 Park Acquisition Charge for Neighborhood Parks Maplewood Code Sec. 21 -46 outlines the need for neighborhood Parks and "the intention of the City Council to develop and implement a ark -open space acquisition and development policy -- P P _ which assigns a function of neighborhood park acquisition and development responsibility. to all housing dwelling unitse Secti on 21 -56 (a) states . P � "The City Council, at its first regu- 1 ar meeting of each calendar year, shall act to adopt by reso- 1 uti on, the average acre acquisition cost and the average acre development cost for ne ghborhood parks throughout . the Ci ty, " In 1982 the Ci Council established the a.cqui si tioncost per acre for neighborhood parks at $4,200, which was an increase from $4 established in 1974, and the development costs were continued from the 1974 amount of $7,500-o When the new figures were inserted in the formula as explained in Maplewood -47 the average cost per acre per person was $79.50. Code Sec. Z1 � 9 In Sec. 21 -48, the population per dwelling unit table is estab- lished and using the $79.50 per person per acre, the cost of a single family it detached dwelling is $326.00 which must be paid 9 at the . time a bui 1 di n permi t i s i s sued . In 198.4 the Ci ty Co-un- ci 1 conti nued the previous rate of $79.50 per person per acre. Th e c ost of raw land In Maplewood over the past n i.ne years has hig appreciated, but conservative value on one acre d be 7 000. If we were to increase our development costs wool $ of 0 $ 15,000 er acre with the Ci assuming 50% of the cost t P development, the formula would indicate that the cost pe r per- son per acre would be increased to $145.00 and the cost-for a single family detached dwelling would be $594.50,. 9 y C g To expect PA charges to be increased from $326.00 to $594 0 00 a ! or sin le residence is not realistic. It does, however, � g consistently u indicate that there is a need.to con y date costs to P sta y relevant with the present economy. A survey in December 1983 of other suburban communities that have a q Park Acquisition Charges indicates that Maplewood has been falling behind . However, the main concern in cal cul a 9 tin costs for acquisition of park property is th.e raw land -and this will vary in cost from community to community. he Park and Recreation It is my recommendation that t Commission • recommending that the average acquisition acre cost be consider recomm 9 increased to $4,775 and the average acre development cost be continued at $7,500, which h will establish a new price of $85.25 per person, p acre or $349.53 per si ngle family detached dwelling* Enc. (2) t w. .. • ./I _ ..� ..� �, r ....� �.► - .v� • ♦�....n.+• �. rrrr�.1..•.��� ....•.u► w .•s..;..� -1 .. a.:.. -� •i_ .... .. .. . - - . .. - • December 1983 R' • MUNICIPALITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT North St. Paul None New 6ri g hton None Brooklyn Center None, Roseville None Maplewood $326 per lot -.- Shoreview acre - 4% of fair market value 0 -2 units /acre of undeveloped land 2.1 - 3 units /acre - 3.1 - 4 units /acre - 4.1 - 5 units /acre - 7% 5.1 - Over - 10% Little Canada $300 per lot $100 per apartment unit Cottage Grove $275 per single family Mounds View. 0 -2 units /acre $100 per acre 2.1 - 3 units /acre - $150 3.1 -4 units /acre - $200 . 4.1 - 5 units /acre - $250 5'- Over units /acre - 101 of assessed value of land Oakdale $325 per unit or 5% land didication r 17% hi h density $270 unit o 9 per Woodbury er single family lot $400 P . $200 per apartment unit Multi- family lot - based on density Eden Prairie • 10% of land or cash in l i e u Plymouth $400 /per lot and outl of Ma le Grove P 0 - 5 u ni / units acre - 7 ;% fair market value acre - 10.6 fair market value 5 -8 / o White bear Twp. $ 150/l ot or option of 10% of f a i r market value Apple Valley 10% on resident value and 5% ponding - not to exceed 12% � Burnsville e 10.6 o of land area or cash based on value Stillwater 10% market value of land December 1984 ' Charges for Neighborhood Parks How To Calculate Park Acqui Cha g 9 . ( 5-15 Acres in Size) `- 100 People Cost per Cost of 1 Acre + 1/2 Cost o f Development) Person p er acre ' i ( Cost of development i s pai d by C ty and developer (1/2) such items as: lay equipment, diamonds, back - Developnent �nclu�des su P _ stops, tennis s courts hard surface area, hockey rink, parki lot., small building. Presently: Cost of 1 Acre 1 Acre ($4,200 + $7,500 } 2 Real Costs in 1984: ($7,000 + $15,000 2 People /Acre 100 = $79.50 /person /acre 100 = $145.00 /person /acre Request for 1985: ($ 4 9 775 + $7,500 -- 100 = • $85.25 /person /acre 2 .What will be the costs to a builder? Persons /Uni t Presently( $79. 501 1984 ( $85.2 • d Si ngl a Family Detache Dwelling i n 4.1 9 � 326.00 349.53 • Mobile Home 2.5 - 198975 213.13 Efficiency Dwelling 1.1 87.45 93 .78 1 Bedroom 3 Bedroom 3.3 262.35 281.33 Townhouse 2 159.00 170.50 1 Bedroom 4 318.00 341.00 3 Bedroom w � • aa w 7 RESOLUTION FOR PARK .ACQUISITION CHARGE f FOR NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS WHEREAS Ma lewood "Code Sec. 21 -46 recognizes the need for neighborhood parks, establishes standards and improvement guidelines for such and provides methods of acquis and.development, and WHEREAS Sec. 21 -56 (a) states that the City Council at its first regular meeting o f each calendar year shall act to adopt by resolution the average acre acquisition cost and the average acre development cost for neighborhood parks through - out the City, and WHEREAS the intention of the Ordinance is to provide for future quality of l i f e through the acquisition and develop- ment of park -open space, and WHEREAS the costs of acquisition of property and the develop- ment of parks has continued. to increase, therefore The Park and Recreation Commission recommends that effective January 14, 1985, the City Council establish the average acre acquisition cost at $4,775, and continues the development cost at $7,500 per acre, with the City financing 50% of the development costs. i ow Action by Council: MEMORANDUM Endo- Y o d d f J RejCvLE f TO: City Manager Datc FROM: Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner SUBJECT: Code Amendment -- Storage Space for Mul ti-pl a Dwellings APPLICANT: City of Maplewood DATE: December 12, 1984 Request Amendment of the ordinance to permit the required 120 cubic feet of miscellaneous storage space in the main building or the garage. Presently, code requires it to • become within the main building... Comments The reason for requiring the extra storage space to be in the same building is convenience. Since this storage space is designed for items that are not used on a regular basis, it seems reasonable to allow this storage in the garage. Recommendation Approval of the ordinance amendment on page 2. 1. Review and recommendation by the Community Design Review Board and HRA 2. First reading by the city council 3. Second reading and public hearing by the city council mb Attachment Ordinance Amendment ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE REQUIREMENT FOR MISCELLANEOUS STORAGE SPACE FOR MULTIPLE DWELLINGS The Maplewood City Council hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. Section 36 -110 is amended as follows (deletions are crossed out and additions are underlined): Section 36 -110.. Same-- .In.door storage spaces. A minimum of one hundred twenty (120) cubic feet of m4see44ameeas storage space, sba�� -be- jade- ar�ai�ab�e-} �- eaEh- �a�t�p�e- dwe���pg- Ee�st�aEted -��- the - E�ty - fey - — eaEh-dwe����g-���t-w��bi�- the - sage b��} d��g- s�Eh dwe���eg �e�t is �eEate� SaEh - stem e- area - shall -be in addition to the normal closet space, that -4s - 4e the- dwell�89 -eR }t- shall be made a v a i l a b l e for each multiple-dwelling unit. Such storag sp ace shall be - located in the same b u i l d i n g a the dwelling u n i t or in the ara e, but shall not be considered as art of the habitable area of a g • d wel ling unit. If located i n the ara e, i t shall be enclosed and shall not be part of the automobile parking area Section 2., This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Council on 1985. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Ayes-- Nays-- r a s a to C. New Apartment Deve pm ent- -Bee Road • �ununi t Design Review Board approval to Don Palme has received y . • e- bedroom apartments (four, four-unit construct sixteen t Beebe Road. The • Lar enteur Avenue, wes buildings) l d� ngs) north t of 6 P t {1 i ti es and • s would unit for $550/ plus u e�ght upper u plus utilities. er units would rent for $525/monthq P the . e� ght area code amendment before . st decide on a storage Council • begi ( See agenda item 7A .) c onstr ct'on can beg 6. Unfin jAed Business 7- e ). New Business _ _ � e Dwelli i n A. Code Amendment Multipl 9 Storage Areas. Commi ssioner Carlson moved and Chairman Fischer seconded to recommend , - 10 as follows (Proposed del etions .are that �ounc�l amend Section 35 1 , n ew language is underlined). crossed out, proposed n . cubic -feet. of m4sEe } }aneeds f one hundred twenty (120) c A minimum o T able -eaeh-- and }t {p }e- dwel }��g- . s ace; 5ha } } - --jade - avail _ - � - b�� }d- st orage P _ - - aEh- dwe } }�n - dn�t -W404R the same . EeAStrdEted --4A -the E4ty fey e � _ _ _ e �n }R _ - ated-:- -Sueh- storage area sha}} b • - sweh- dwel}{ng unfit 4s }eE Mt: - g• cl oset s ace that -s -finthe - dwe } }�Rg - u addition on to the normal cl , � - Such P _ i able for each mul t� 1 e -dwel l i n unit. shall be made ava 1 as the dwellin all be located in the same bui 1 din storage space shall .red as art of the • garage, but shall not be conside unit or n the h s i s locate d n a ab a area of i ll n un� t. If suc habit d area an shall .not encroach on t shall be in an enclose g arage. 0 . 1 the normal automobile parking area. . - - mit voted ,against the Motion car Commissioner hat carried--3 to 1. Commi s s i oner Sch additional storage space moti On because he-does not agree t ' side of a dwelling ng unit. He otherwise should be required out is retained by revision, i f the requirement rement • supports the-recommended . _- Council. • Mortgage g • MNFA n� c� pal Home Participati Program • Commissioner Carlson seconded to Commi ss i o r Schm� t .moved and Comma s s � bankers osals from area mortgage authorize s aff to request prop t a e money. for an allocation . of tax-exemption mor g g and home bus ers would recommend that the city re is en ugh interest, the HRA If the g to Housing Finance Agency for i t an a 1 i t� on to the M� nneso 9 , submit PP r t g a e Participation Program* funding rom the unicipal Home g 9 Mo . The following progra requirements were.agreed 2 M t d P'.- MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Planning Commission Resignation DATE: December 3, 1984 v1 �ir1 ��� V J uY, n •; � , Elsa F1 C .,t 1 .L Re e t Dat e Enclosed is a letter of resignation from Warren Robens and a resolution of appreciation. Recommendation Approve the resolution jw Enclosures: 1. Letter of resignation 2. Resolution r. lie 0/ IL FA axe 40,00000:;000 t7 ob L-006 low ML moos to SI�Y�N�pwNDSSfM DA t7 .FI:. — ..:.. H54�� t9 NOV JOINT RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION WHEREAS, Glat.en Robend hab been a membelt oJ the P.eann.i.ng Commibaion oJ Maplewood, M.i.nne,6*ota since June 30, .19 3, and has eeAved JaithJutty in that capacity to the pneae►tit time; and WHEREAS, the p.eann.i.ng conmtivaLon necogn i.ze.6 hips expeh.i.ence, teadet- ah,ip and good judgment; and WHEREAS, he hcca juety given oJ his ti.me and eneAgy, without compenaa ti.on, ion the be ttehmenx aJ the City o J Maptewood; and WHEREAS, he has ahown stincehe dedicati-on to his dccti.ez and hay con. - iatentty covtttibu.ted his .CeadeJcahip, time and eJJont ion the beneJit oJ the city. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT NEREBy RESOLVED ion and on beha.P.J oJ the City o� Maptewood, Mi.nne.zota, and .i to c,<.ti.zena, that tUaAvicen Robens .ins h.eAeby extended out hea,4zie.P.t gnati tude and appneci.afii.on jolt hus dedicated eeAviee and we w.i b h him continued aueeea.a in the Pa.dz ed by the counc i.e. 06 the City oJ Maptewood this day os I t 1985 J ohn C. neavu, M ayo& Paaded by the pea,nvii.ng Comm.i,aa�.on oi the City oJ Map.Cewaod this 17th day oJ Decembe>c , 1984 LeateA AXdahi ChaiAman Ptannn ing Commission Luec.P.ee E. wceP,e.u,b, C.�eJc MEMORANDUM City Manager Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner Planning Commission and Community Design Review Board _ Appointments January 3-9 1985 The following terms expired January 1, 1985: Planning Commission (3-year terms ) Member Original Appointment Seeking Reappointment Richard Barrett at least 1970 yes two vacancies Community Design Review Board (2 year terms) Thomas Deans 8 -06 -81 yes George Rossbach 6 -10 -83 yes one vacancy Comment Staff advertised for vacancies on the planning commission, community design review board, parks and recreation commission and civil service commission in the Maplewood Review on November 28. The application deadline was December 14. Section 25 -20 of city code states that the chairman of the planning commission shall be designated by the city council at the first meeting in January of each year. Les Axdahi is the present chairman. Recommendation I. Reappoint members to the planning commission and community design review board. He Appoint a chairman of the p_l anni ng commission. III. Appoint two new members to the planning commission and one new member to the community design review board. s 7 C. I a ■■,nk■■alik &UAIM 90k �i,Alk•AP 11111W juvw vall 11%r rallpv`airl a A 1 b �T T Honorable Mayor Gre avu and City Council City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Ave Maplewood, Mn. 55109 Dear Mayor and Council Members: 2515 E. Seventh Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55109 (6 777 -8800 December 13, 1984 We are pleased to submit the following quotation on publishing of minutes and other legal.publications during 1985. As you are aware, the Minnesota State Legislature establishes the legal rate for publishing legal notices. However, as in the past, we will discount the legal rate for publishing council proceedings. . Legal publication rates for public notices, bids, etc., $4.71 per column inch, $6.29 tabulated and $3.14 per column inch for each additional publication in 6 point type. These rates are .the same as last year, the numbers are somewhat different because of a change by the Minnesota Legislature. Thank you for allowing us to serve as your legal newspaper during 1984. Yours truly, N. The dore Lillie Raymond J. Enright N_ i 11 RAMSEY COUNTY REVIEW — MAPLEWOOD REVIEW — WASHINGTON COUNTY REVIEW — NEW BRIGHTON BULLETIN SHOREVIEW BULLETIN -- ST. ANTHONY BULLETIN REVIEW SHOPPERS' GUIDE — ROSEVILLE REVIEW -- BULLETIN SHOPPERS' GUIDE -- SHOREVIEW- VADNAIS HEIGHTS SHOPPERS' GUIDE SOUTH - WEST REVIEW — WOODBURY•SOUTH MAPLEWOOD REVIEW s • R LeFevere Lef ler Kennedy O'Brien �' .�G?:� �l'1 ��� �OLlr].G1 � DI - a N% , z Endorse d,.,�...__�___� :1 I'ro)fe%sion:il Yiu�.jf'12Ci.��. IssoK iatio n Rejecte Date 2000 First First Bank Place West December 6, 1984 Minneapolis Minnesota 55402 Telephone (612) 333 -0543 Telecopier (612) 333 -0540 Clayton L. LeFevere TO CLERKS OF ALL MUNICIPALITIES BELONGING Herbert P. Lefler TO THE SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY J. Dennis O'Brien John E. Drawz David J. Kennedy - John B. Dean Glenn E. Purdue Richard J Schieff r Charles L. LeFevere Enclosed are two copies of a resolution designating the Herbert P. Lefler III Jeffrey J . Strand director and alternate director from your community to Mary J. Bjorklund y John G. Kressel Dayle Nolan the Suburban . Rate Authority. As soon as your council Cindy L. Lavorato Michael A. Nash has a ppointed Brun F. Rice PP your representatives to the Suburban Rate Lorraine S. augg James J. Thomson, Jr Authority for 1985, please send one completed co of. James M. Strommen copy Mary C. Nielsen Terry L . Hall the resolution and certificate to me, Ronald H. Batty Very truly yours, Clayton L.' LeFevere, Attorney Suburban Rate Authority CLL : j p f Enclosures RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Minnesota, as follows is hereby designated to serve as a director of the Suburban Rate Authority, and is hereby designated to serve as alternate director of the Suburban Rate Authority for the year 1985 and until their successors are appointed, STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of hereby certify that the attached and foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the City Council Gf at its meeting on 198 as the same is recorded in the minutes of the meeting of such council for said date, on f ile and of record in my of f ice . Dated this day of 198 City Clerk (SEAL) City of RESOLUTION DE S I GNAT I NG DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Minnesota, as follows: is hereby designated to serve as a director of the Suburban Rate Authority, and is hereby designated to serve as alternate director of the Suburban Rate Authority for the year 1985 and until their successors are appointed, STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of hereby certify that the attached and foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution.duly adopted by the City Council of at its meeting on 198 as the same is recorded in the minutes of the meeting of such council for said date on file and of record in my office. Dated this day of 198 City Clerk (SEAL) City of