Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983 10-10 City Council PacketAGENDA Maplewood City Council 7 :00 P.M., Monday, October 10, 1983 Municipal Admi strati on Bui 1 di ng Meeting 83 -25 A) CALL TO ORDER B) ROLL CALL C)__ APPROVAL OF MINUTES D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA E) CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one *motion in the form listed below. There wi 11 be no separate discuss ion on these items, if discussion is desired, thatp item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 10 Accounts Payable 2. Certification of Delinquent Sewer Accounts 30 Agreement on Traffic Signal - Co. Rd. D & Rice Street PUBLIC HEARINGS 11 Cade Amendment: gdmnt: Parkin Lots -- 2nd Reading (4 'Votes) 7:00 2. Variance: Parkway Dr. (.Somerset Ridge) 7 :15 3. Preliminary Plat: Clausen Addition 7:30 440 Variance: 2108 McMenemy (Wegleitner) 7 :45 5. Plan Amendment: Lower Afton & McKnight (4 Votes) 8:00 5a. Rezoning: Lower Afton & McKnight (4 Votes) 8:00 G) AWARD OF BIDS Traffic Signals: Co. Rd. B & Rice, NY UNFINISHED BUSINESS Review A eal : Co. Rd. B & 'Van Dyke1, Conditional Use Permit/Plan pp Van Dyke (4 Votes)2, Water Main Extension - c , ACCOUNTS PAYABLE OCTOBER 10 ,19 8 3.Page 1 1983 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER f ` Ct1ECK N0.DATE _.AMOUNT ._ --- .__.._--- __VENDOR ..- -_._._ITEM DES : R IP TI Oy 256472 09/27/83 15 METRO WASTE C ON TR SAC PBL 153 00- - . - -_ -.METRO - WASTE CONTR SAC PBL 15147.00 # 256502 09/27183 59071.95 MN STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC PB! 256502 09/27/ - - _ -1800.00 _ _MN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LICENSE 5 ,v251.95 t 256KO2 09/27/83 55.388.58 KL ?NE HESS LAND EASEMENTS 55 256KO3 09127/83 703.02 NORTHWESTERN BN K CONTRACT PYM 703.02 257502 09127/83 2 MN STATE TREASURER MOTOR VE LIC PBi 257502 09/27/83 255 :00 MN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC PBL 3.026.90 258502 09/27183 2 051.g3 MN STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC PBl 253502 09/27/83 152.00 MN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC PBL 2203.83 258742 09/27/83 74.50 CLERK OF )I STIR CRT CNTY DRIVERS LIC 74.50 t 259502 09/27/83 29386.95 MN STATE TREASURER 1 MOTOR VE4 LIC PBL 259502 09/27/83 207.00 MN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC PBL 2.593.95 259710 09/27/83 _660.45 _POSTMASTE3. _POSTAGE 660.45 259730 09/27183 600 RAMCO . PUBLI SHINS PUBLISHING 6.00 262502 09/27/83 3.174.60 MN STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC PB1. 262502 09/27/83 16740 MN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LICENSE F - i 1993 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER w CHECK NO*DATE AMOUNT_ __- - ___V__NDOR .... ... _ -.._. ___.. __ wITEMDES:RIPTION 3 341.60 262531 D9/27/83 15.00 M _ R A_ . . _ _ .... _TRAVEL TRAININGj 15 *00 263152 09/27/83 2.75 JUDY CHLEBECK TRAVEL TRAINING 263152 09/27/83 8 *65 JUDY CHLEBECK TRAVEL TRAINING 263152 09/27/83 -------3.50 -JUDY CHLEBECK TRAVEL TRAINING 263502 D9/27I83 7_1T6.50 STATE TREASURER MOTOR V EH LIE PB! 263502 09/27/83 275.00 MN MN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC PBL 7,104 51e50 263504 09/27/83 110721048 MN ST TREAS SURTAX SURTAX PBL 263504 09/27/83 34.43-MN ST TREAS SURTAX SURTAX PBL 1968705 263KO6 09/27/83 296040 WILDERNESS WORKSHOP REPAIR MA INT BLD( 263KO6 09/27/83 -2 *96-WILDERNESS WORKSHO REPAIR MAINT BLD( 293 *44 264441 ;09/27/83 1.441 *00 r. MAPL.. LEA OFFICIALS rUMPIREF 1944100 264466 09/27/83 8000 METRO AREA MGT ASSN TRAVEL TRAINING 8.00 264502 09/27/83 3, 513.65 -MN STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC PBi 264502 09127183 230*00 MN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC PBL 3,743.65 264557 --- -___..D9i - - --9554 . .79__ - _MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 264557 09/27/83 39449 *37 MN ST TREAS PERA PERA. PBL 264557 09/27/83 18 *22 MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL _ 264557 09!27183 43.52 -- -MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 264557 09/27/83 29 *71 MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 1983 CITY OF M APLE Y000 CMECK REGISTER i CHECK _NO*DATE .--- - - - - -_AMOUNT ___— _ -- -YrN00_ITEM DES :RIPT:O" 264557 09/27/83 100.76 MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 264557 09/ 2718 1 73.40 __ -.----.MN ST TREAS PERA _PERA PBL 264557 09127183 187099 MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 264557 09127/83 38.37 MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL a 2645 57 0 9/27/83 59.34 _ _ - _ _M_N ST TREAS PERA _PERA PBL 264557 09/27/83 364.51 MN ST TREAS PERA P =RA PBL 264557 09/27183 146993 MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 2645 5T 0,9/27/$3-R4 - - -MN ST TREAS PERA -PERA PBL 264557 09/27/83 3.968. 356.34 MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 264557 09/27/83 275.08 MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 264557 09127/83 209 _MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 264557 09/27/83 142090 MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 264557 09/27/83 130.39 MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 2645 09/27/_83 NN ST.—TREAS.PERA.-.- _P E R A P -BL 264557 09/27/83 335.68 MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 264557 09/27/83 33.36 MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 264557 09/27/83 194.95 _MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 264557 - --09127/83 - -332.53 MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 264557 09/27183 40.08 MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 264557 09/27/53 127e59 --- - - --MN .ST TREAS PERA __..PERA PBL 264557 09/27/83 93082 MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 264557 09/27/83 64.76 MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 264557 09/27/83 49.58 ._MN ST TREAS PERA PER PBL 264557 -09/27/83 65.96 MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 264557 09/27183 16.66 MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 264557 09/27/83 376.41 _MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 264557 09/27183 119080 MN ST TREAS PERA PERA PBL 14s 663.35 264K05 .09/27/53 . ---- -250.0.0 _._ - - -UNITED ARTIST.COMM.-PROG SUP'LIES 0MOO 265502 09/27/83 39303.40 MN STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LI C Pf PBL 265532_..09/27/83 149.00 -- -- - -_-MN STATE TREASURER ORTVERS LIC 3.452.40 265 742 09127/83 79.00 CLERK OF O I STR CRT CNTY DRIVERS LI( 79 266287 --0927/$3 30000 GREW JANET FUEL OIL 266287 09/27/83 30000 GREW JANET FUEL OIL 265 352 09/27/83 13.80 --INTL CONF BLDG OFF BOOKS 13.0 0 1983 CITY OF M APtE WO OD CHECK REGISTER K N0.DATE AMOUNT ITEM DES :RIPTION 266502 09/27/83 214.00-MN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LICENSE P 266502 091 214.00 MN ST ATE TREASURER DRIVERS LICENSE P 266738 09/27183 16000 RAMS!-'Y CNTY PTAC TRAV =L TRAIN 160000 * 26SK04 09/27/83 048 SCOTT ALLAN REFUND 48 t* f: t 261015 0 9/27/83 321.85 ._. _.AFSCME _UNIOV DUES 269015 09/27183 5.32 AFSCME UNION DUES 327,17 269153 09/27183 13 +103.00 CTY CNTY CREO.IT UN CREDIT UNION PBL 13,103.00 269330 09127/83 761.54 ICMA RETIREMNT CORP DEF =RRE3 COMP 269330 09/27/83 102.96 ICMA RETIREMNT CORP DEF:RRED COMP 864.50 269373 09/27/83 145900 KAWE ROSEMARY P/R DEDUCT 145.0 0 269453- -09/27I83. - - --13 +361..27 MA LEYOOD ST BNK FWT PBL 269453 09/27!83 187.50 MAPLEWOOD ST BNK SAVIvGS BONDS PBL 269470 69%27/83 _ __.__.._.---21 000 --METRO SUP_ R VI SORY UNIOV DUES 21 ,00 269 50 2 09/27183 1 000.00-MN STATE TREAS MOTOR VEH LI C PBt 269502 09/27/83_... - -. -.-3 +543.85 -_MN STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC PB 269502 09127/83 214.00 MN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LICENSE r r. - w-- _. ` w• _. .w'«. +. t'. w./.._r.- .wwnr r w •w. w fasw+ Arr Aarrwr••..w wa++r_w. u..rw. 1983 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK N09 DATE -- - -- _ _AMOUNT -- - - -- - --_VEND-CR __.. - - . -ITEM DES., R IP TI O 2.757.85 269520 09127/83 273.70 MN BENEFIT ASSN INSURANCE 273.70 # r :tom•* 269540 09127/83 310.00 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS INSURANCE 310.00 ffttft 269556 09/27/83 300.00 MN ST RETIREMENT DEF:RREO COM- 300.00 269559 0 T, 374.87 _MN ST TREAS S/S S/S PBL 269559 09/27/83 7,MN ST TREAS S/S S/S PBL 14, 749.74 f 2697 09/27/83 36.00 RAMSEY CNTY CONCIL AMB BILLING PBL 36.00 t *ftt 269870 09/27/83 7 MN ST COMM REVENUE SWT PBL 7 934.4 *. 269937 09/21/83 175.00 -UNTTEO WAY ST PAUL P/R DEDU;, T 175.00 269973 09/27/83 286,3 2 WISC DEPT REVENUE SWT PBL 28602 269KOl 09/27/83 1149 788.67 ALEXANDER CONST CONTRACT PYM 114 9 788.6 7 270502 09/29/83 5,733.30 MN STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEP LTC Pi 273502 09/29/83 268.00 MN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LICENSE 6.001.30 J peo 1983 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK N0.DATE — _^AMOUNT - -- _ -- _VE NO 01 -- - -- _ - - _ _ITEM DES: R IP TI OV 270058 09/29/83 254.00 _ -COLLINS KENNETH TRAY -L TIA N 'rVGI 254.00 27DK40 09129/83 8000 BASS LATTA REFUyD 8.00 271502 09/29%83 7,033.56 MINN STAT- TREASURER MOTOR v&- LIC PB 271502 09/29/83 202.00 MINN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC PBL 7, ttt * *t 271K41 09/29/83 -1 56.40 MN DAILY VEWSPAPER PUBLI SHI NG 1 56.4 0 271 K42 09/29/83 44.05 VIETOR LORRAINE TRAVEL TRAINING 44.05 f 272232 09/29/83 1 _EMPL BENEFIT TRUST DENTAL INS PBL 19000000.* 272502 09/29/83 69365.75 PTNN STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC PB 272502 09/29/83 1 32.50 _ _MINN STAT= TREASURER DRIVERS LIC PBL 6 272742 09/29/83 6240 CLERK OF DISTR CRT CNTY DRIVERS LIC 62.00 272C56 b9/29/83 - --85.30 - -AURELIUS LUCILLE TRAVEL TRAINING 272C56 09/29/83 53.96 AURELIUS LUCILLE TRAVEL. TRAINING 139.26 273502 09%30%83 4 , 9 - 506 - 0 - 15 - - -- --MN STATE TREASURER -DRIVE'RS LIC PBL 273502 09/30/83 326.00 MN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC PBL r.6 832 i 283050 09/28/83 X4-035 - .-- ...._.._..._ART - MECHANICAL SERV SUPPLIES 283050 09/28/83 244.D0 ARI MECHAVICAL SERV SUPPLIES 1983 CITY OF MAPLE WOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK N0.DATE A MOUNT VENDOR ITEM DES C R IP TI O4I 283050 09/28/ 3 457,21 ARI MECHANICAL SERV SUPPLIES 283050 09/28/83 27.65 - - - --ARI MECHANICAL SERV SUPPLIES 283050 -D9/28/83 19810.15 ARI MECHANICAL SERV SUPPLIES 2 tf• :mot 28.3059 09/28/8 -.. - --18.60 _ --ARTSIGN - -OFFICE SUPPLIES 18.60 283068 09/28/83 1061.60 AUTOCON INDUSTRIES I SUPPLIES 283080 39/28/83 23.79 BATTERY + TIRE WHSE SUPPLIES VEH 283080 09/28/83 23.79-BATTERY + TIRE WHSE SUPPLIES VE4 283080 09/28/83 23979 BATTERY + TIRE WHSE SUPPLIES VEH 283080 09/28/83 69.00 - -BATTERY + TIRE WHSE SUPPLIES VEH 283080 09/28/83 45.99 BATTERY + TIRE WHSE SUPPLIES VEH 1 38.78 283097 09/28/R3 61079 BILL + BOYER FORD SUPPLIES VEH 61.79 283103 09/28/83 195 oD2 ..- .BOARD OF MATER COMM CONTRACT PYM 283103 0 9/28f$33 576.85 BOARD OF MATER COMM CONTRACT PYM 283103 09/28f83 2,1 56.00 BOARD OF WATER COMM CONTRACT PYM 283103 09/28/83 4 10752.00 BOARD OF WATER COMM CONTRACT PYM 79 679.87 283194 09/28/83 2100 FAUST DANIEL F TRAVEL TRAINING 21.00 283222 09/28/83 50.52 EASTMAN KODAK DUPLICATING COST 283222 09/28/83 6.24 EASTMAN KODAK DUPLICATING COST 283222 09/28/83 67.99 EASTMAN KODAK DUPLICATING COST. 283222_ --09/28/83R__-4 EASTMAN KODAK DUPLICATING COST 283222 09/28/83 230.93 EASTMAN KODAK DUPLICATING COST 283222 0 9/28/83 201 .92 _ _ _EASTMAN KODAK DUPLICATING COST 283222 0 9/28/83 322.77 EASTMAN KODAK DUPLICATING COST. 283222 09/28/83 231.87 EASTMAN KODAK DUPLICATING COST 1,559.29 r_ 1983 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK N0.DATE _ -- - -. _.._AMOUNT -- -- - - - -VENDOR -- -ITEM DES :RIPTION 283230 09128/83 400000 -_ - ___...-AEMPBENEFITPLANS IN NTCONTRACT PYM 400.00 t- 283235 ;;09/28183 MAO FABRA GRA PROG SUPPLIES 105.00 283236 09/28/x3 200000 EVANS BARRY VIENTCLE ALLO WNCE 200.00 283237 09/28183 79.37 FEDERAL LUMBER CO SUPPLIES 79.37 283269 09/28/8.3 43.26 GENUINE PARTS CO SUPPLIES VEH 43.26 : 2832 7 6 09f28/8398/83 251.68 GOODYEAR S =RVICE STO SUPPLIES VEH 283276 09/28/83 68.42 GOODYEAR SERVICE STO SUPPLIES VEH 283276 09/28!83 122.94 GOODYEAR SERVICE STO SUPPLIES VEH 283276 09/28/83 4.50 _G SERVICE STO SUPPLIES VEH 447.54 283285 09/28/83 480000 GRACE DUANE CONSULTING I NSP 480.00 283287 -09/28/83 -- -9.54 -GREW JANET TRAVEL TRAINING 9.54 2E3301 09!28/83 NEJNY RENTALS INC - _EQUIPRENTAL ©U P 283301 09/28/83 - 110.000 _ _ 44.00 HEJNY RENTALS INC RENTAL EaUIP 283301 09/28/83 16500 NEJNY RENTALS INC RENTAL = 0UIP 319.00 283330 -9 /28 /S3 _.. __37 - .ICMA RETIREMENT CORP BOOKS 283330 09/28/83 52.50 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP BOOKS 89.50 283332 09/28/83 562.50 IND SCHOCL DIST 622 PRINTING 5 62.5 0 f. 1983 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK N0.D - -- -- --AMOUNT -- - -VE NOC ITEM DES ; R IP TI ON S 283348 09/28/83 162.60 TNTL BUS MACHINES CO OFFICE SUPPLIES 162.60 ! J 283368 09/28/83 12.00 JOURNAL OF CIVIL DEF MEMBERSHIP 283372 09/28/83 6.20 K —MART SUPPLIES 6.20 283384 09128/83 86.87 KNOX LUMBER SUPPLIES 86.87 t trr *t# 283395 -09/29/83 3* 227,85 LAIS BANNIGAN +KELL LEGAL SERV 283395 09129/83 1.6DOoOD LAIS BANNIGAN.*KELL LEGlkL SERV 283395 09/29f83 _39.37 -.LAIS BANNIGAN +KELL LEGAL SERV 283395 09/29/83 39.38 LAIS BANNIGAN +KELL LEGAL SERV 283395 09/29/83 11925 LAIS BANNIGAN +KELL LEGAL SERV 283395 09/29/83 33.75 LAIS BANNIGAN +KELL LEGAL SERV 283395 09/29/83 82,35 LAIS BANNIGAN +KELL LEGAL SERV 283395 09/29/83 22.50 LAIS BANNIGAN +KELL LEGAL SERV 283395 09/29/83 119.7 _.__._LAIS BANNIGAN }KELL LEGAL SERV 283395 09/29/83 270000 LAIS BANNIGAN +KELL LEGAL SERV 283395 09/29/83 56925 LAIS BANNIGAN +KELL LEGAL SERV 283395 09/29/83 551925 LAIS BANNIGAN +KELL LEGAL SERV 6. 0 S 3 . b 5 * - -- - - - 283401 09/28/83 3500 LAWS RICHARD CANINE OFFICER 35.00 t 283408 09/28/83 - -- --111.59 LAY ENFOR EQUIP SUPPLIES 283408 09/28/83 123.75 LAW ENFOR'#."E EQUIP SUPPLIES 235.34 mot *. 283435 09/28/83 24.60 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT I SUPPLIES YEN 24.60 283477 _ -09/28183 500 SETTLER D4NIEL CANIN. - O=FI'ER r 1983 CITY OF MAPLE WOOD CHECK REGISTER CIIEC K NO DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DES: R IP TI ON 335.00+ 293550 009/28/83 113.74- "M PJBLIC WWORKS AASSO TTELE 2 9 09/28/83 - -13.74 MN PUBLIC WWORKS AASSO TTELEPHONE 4 .00 283576 113 9/28/83 995.00 _OT010LA IINC RREPAIR MAINT 283576 -D9/28183 - -64.60 -- M INC RREPAIR MAINT 2283576 009/28x83 2211008 MMOTOROLA IINC RREPAIR M41NT 283576 -09/28/83 -873.90 _ _ _MOTOROLA IINC RREPAIR M4LNT0 283647 009/28/83 11.581.94 NNORT -1- ST 3314UL CITY UUTILITIES 283647 009/29/83 553.10 _NORTH ST PPIAUL CITY UUTILITIES 283647 1139/28/83 - - - N NORTH ST PPAUL CITY CCONTRACT PYM 2.034.63 + 2283658 009/28/83 _1 296.04 NNORTH =F4N SSTATES PPOKE UUTILITIES 283658 - 1 NORTH- =RN SSTATES PPOWE UUTILITIES 253658 009/28/83 11, NNORT#+ =RN SSTATES PPOPE UUTILITIES 283658 .09/28183 _65.95 _NORTHEERN SSTATES PPOPE UUTILITIES 2836.58 0 6 NORTHERN SSTATES PPONE UUTILITIES 283658 009/28/83 665.95 NNORTHEERN SSTATES PPOWE UUTILITIES 283658 009/28/83 _2.40 :NORTHERN SSTATES PP UUTILITIES 2283658 0 2 NORTHERN SSTATES PPOwE UUTILITIES 283658 009128/83 33.53 NNORTH =RN SSTATES PPOWE UUTILITIES 283658 009/28/83 33. NNORTHERN SSTATES PP 0 WE UUTILITIES _ 283658 -09/28183 _. _NNORTHERN SSTATES PPOWE UUTILITIES 283658 009/28/83 1102.36 NNORTHERN SSTATES PPOWE UUTILITIES 283658 009/28/$3 _6,020.98 _ EERN SSTATES PPOWE UUTILITIES6 1983 CITY OF MAPLE NO OD CHECK R E5 ISTE R f MCK ND.DATE AMOUNT VE NDOR ITEM DES f R IP TI O4 283658 09/28:/83 4.25 NORTHERN STATES PONE UTILITIES 283658 09/28/83 71.83 NORTHERN STATES PONE UTILITIES 283658 09/28/83 17012 NORTHERN STATES PONE UTILITIES 283658 09/28/83 10.06 NORTHERN STATES POPE UTILITIES 283658 09/28/83 443.32 -- -NORTWERN STATES POWE UTILITIES 283658 -09/28183 - --19072 --NORTHERN STATES PONE UTILITIES 283658 09/28/83 168.36 NORTHERN STATES POPE UTILITIES 283658 09/28/83 7 NORTHERN STATES POPE UTILITIES 283658 09/28/83 101008 NORTH -RN STATES POPE UTILITIES 283658 09/28/R3 81.21 NORT4 STATES POPE UTILITIES 283658 09/28/83 23.82 _NORTHERN STATES POWE UTILITIES 283658 09/28/83 90.50 NORTHERN STATES PONE UTILITIES 283658 D9128/83 11.79 NORTHS RN STATES PONE UTILITIES 283658_ _ - -09 /28/83 --291.75 - - - - - --N.ORTHEERN STATES PO WE. ..- -UTILITIE S _ 99993.59 283660 09%28/83 30.52 NORTHWESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE 283660 09/28/83 - - --38 .90.BELL TE TELEPHONE 283660 09/28183 2300 NORTHWESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE 283660 09/28/83 38090 NORTH+WESTEIN BELL TE TELE PHONE 283660 09/28/83 42.710 NORTHWESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE 283660 09/28/83 50,55 NORTHWESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE 283660 09/28/83 40080 NORTHWESTEIN BELL TE TELEPHONE 283660 09/28/83 -42.70 NORTHWESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE 283 660 _ --09/28/83 42970 NORTHWEST EER N BELL TE TELEPHONE 283660 D9/28/83 42.70 NORTHWESTER N BELL TE TELEPHONE 283660 09/28/83 42.70 NORTHWESTERN BELL TE TEL:. HONE 283660 09/28/83 13.74 NORTHWEST =RN BELL TE TELEPHONE 283660 0 9/28/83 39.28 NORTHWESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE 283 660 09/28/83 99 - - - -N ORTHWESTE3 N BELL TE TELEPHONE 283660 09/28/83 67995 NORTHWESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE 283660 09/28/83 103.11 NORTHWESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE 283660 09/28/83 16 +65 NORTHWESTERN BELL TE TEL =HONE 776.24 + 283674 09/28/83 753.73 OLD DOMINION BRUSH SUPPLIES VEH 283674 09/28/83 1 E2.73-OLD DOMINION BRUSH SUPPLIES VEH 5 91.0 0 * -- 283702 09/28/83 74000 PITN_Y BOWES CONTRACT PYr 74.00 283744 09/28/83 188.44 RAMSEY COUNTY CONTRACT PYM 188944 28_3756_. ___.__09/28/.53_-81.239 RAMS: Y. _.000NTY_..TREASU._ -- ._ .__CONTRACT PYM 4 1983 CITY OF MA PlE WO OD C"ECK REGISTER CHECK NO.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DES : R IP TI ONI 812.39 283768 09/28/83 4.50 RICE STRE=T CAR WASH CAR WASH VE'I 2$3768 _ --09!2$/83 -- -- -121 .SO - - -RICE STREET CAR WASH CAR WASH VEH 283768 09/28/53 22.50 RICE STRE_ -T CAR WASH CAR WASH VEH 283768 09/28/83 4.50 RICE STRE =T CAR WASH CAR MASH VEH 153.00 * 283798 09/28/83 64.14 S } T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFIC= SUPPLIES 283798 09/28f83 4 0 _ _S t T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 283798 09/28/83 2.06 S + T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 283798 09/28/83 9019 S + T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 283798 09/28/83 38.83 S + T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 283 798 - --09/28f83 - -3 - - - - -S + T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 283798 09/28/83 2.35 S + T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 283798 09/28/83 95, 04 -_ _ _S *_T OFFICE PRODUCE _OFFIC= SUPPLIES 283798 ^09/28/83 10.14 S * T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 283798 09/28/83 13.60 S + T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 283798 09/28/83 151.62 S + T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 283798 09/28/83 - - - - '2300 - -S - * T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 283798 09/28/83 15.96 S T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 283798_09/28/83 4908 -- -S T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 283798 09/28/83 y 7028 S + T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 283798 09/28%83 19.28 S + T OFFICE FRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 283798 09/28/83 19 S + T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 283798 -09/28/93 --29000- -S - T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFIC= SUPPLIES 283798 09/28/83 27049 S + T OFFICE PR CDUCT PROG SUPPLIES 283798 09/28/83 319.00 _S_ T . OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 754.22 283815 09/28/83 72060 SHARROW CC SUPPLIES 72.60 283842 - --09128f 83 59.84 - - - --ST PAUL DISP . - --PUBLISHING 59.84 283855 09128f83 18.5 0 STAPLES PA U LI NE OFFICE SUPPLIES 283873 09128183 9296.31 STATE OF MN CONTRACT PYM 99296.31 283874 09128183 32.50 STD SPRING &--ALIGN REPAIR MaINT 1953 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CM ECK N0.DATE - -___- __ ---AMOUNT --------VENDOR ITEM. OES R IP TI 0'V 49 =:32950 283889 09/28/83 2.071.65 - - - --T - A S CHIFSKY _ .._...IES 2 * 0 T1. 6 5 SUPPL f 283890 " --39 / 2 - - -20 ...---------TARGET STORES INC OFFICimp E SUPPLIES - 283890 09/28/83 47940 TARGET STORES INC PROG SUPPLIES 50.19 t 2838.91 39128/83 30994 TAUBMAN DOUG TRAVEL TRAINING 30.94 283910 39/28/83 12.D0 TRUCK UTILITIES t MF SUPPLIES VEH 12.00 283914 39/28/83 40000 TWIN CITY FILTER SER REPAIR MAINT BLDG 40000 283930 09/28/83 19.00 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRIM SUBS :RIPTION 19.00 283932 09/28/83 4405 _UH'FORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 283932 09/28/83 94.05 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS gri 283932 09/28/83 21050 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 283932 09/28/83 - --122.30 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 283932 09/28/83 49090 -- -UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 283932 09/28/83 98000 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 283932_ _09/28/83 __..4 00 ..__. _UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 283932 09/28/83 232.85 UNIFORMS UNLIMI TED UNIFORMS 21!3932 09/28/83 15.75 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 233932 09/28/83 - - - --66.00 - - - --UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 793.40 : f :ftf 283938 09128/83 14.74 UNIVERSAL MED SUPPLIES VEH ' 283938 __..09/28/83_ -RED SUPPLIES VEH 283938 09/28/83 14.74 UNIVERSAL _ - -.- -- _..._. UNIVERSAL 14 ED SUPPLIES 283938 09/28/83 17000 UNIVERSAL RED SUPPLIES 31. 74__. *_ -____ 23947 09/28/83 743.40 VALS BODY SHOP REPAIR MAINT VEH 743940 t 1983 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER t' i.CHECK N0.DATE AMOUNT VEN00R ITEM DESCRIPTION firltt 283956 09/28/83 52.7;WAGERS .IhC OFFICE SUPPLIES 52.74 283957 09/28/83 2089 WARNERS TRUEVALUE HD SUPPLIES 283957 09/28/83_2.89 WARNERS TRUEVALUE HD SUPPLIES 283957 09/28!83 2089-WARNERS TRUEVALUE HD SUPPLIES 283957 09/28f83 38.42 WARNERS TRUEVALUE HO SUPPLIES 283957 09/28/83 49001 WARNERS TRUEVALUE HD SUPPLIES 90.32 * 283960 09128/83 51.90 WEBER + TROSETH INC REPAIR MAINT VEH 283960 09/28/83 51.90-tiEBER TROSETH INC REPAIR MAINT VEH 283960' - - - - --09/28/83 ___ _...___.51.90 - - - - --WEBER TROSETH INC REPAIR MAINT VEH 283960 09/28/83 26.00 WEBER + TROSETH INC SUPPLIES 283960 09/28/83 14.00 WEBER TROSETH INC REPAIR MAINT VEH 91 : 283961 09/28/83 104.00 WEBER ELECTRIC INC REPAIR MAINT OLD( 283961 09/28!83 408.00 _. _..WEBER ELECTRIC INC -REPAIR MAINT OLD( 512.00 283A74 0 9/28/83 1 s 448.00 DAWSON PATTERSON CONTRACT PYM 19448.00 i f 283021 09/28/83 12.00 DISPATCH NEWSPAPERS 12.00 283C32 09/28/83 2040 KLAUSING HENRY UNIFORMS 20.00 t* *tom• 283 C 4 5 09/28/83 ..5.00 - -JOHNSON RANDY TRAVEL TRAINING X5.0 0 * 283C76 09128/83 61.80 OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES MAO 283CSO - -09/28./83 16.00 -- _-RECHTENWA.LD CAROLINE REFUND 16.00 1983 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK N0.DATE .- -AMOUNT - -- --VE NDO . - -_.. _. _ _. _ .ITEM DES :RTP TT ON 283053 09/28/83 20.00 LUKIN STEVEN EMT Instruct 20.00 283E23 09128/83 153.70 SPECIALTY RADIO SERV SUPPLIES VET 283E23 09/28/83 20100 SPECIALTY RADIO SERV SUPPLIES VE4 283E23 09/28/83 42.82 SPECIALTY RADIO SERV SUPPLIES VEI 397.8 2 t i 283E32 09/28/83 64.49 HALWEG KEVIN R UNIFORMS 64.49 283 F24"09128f83 11608 R ASC44(E A; BERT TRAVEL TRAINING 11 .OS 283F81 09/28./83 9.55 DATA _DISPATCHING INC DELIVERY 9.55 c 283 F90 09/28/83 3.50 JOLLY S SUPPLIES 283 G08 rc 832909//123.00 E BADHOAGIE GE BUTTON _ -JULY 4TH 12340 283 G65 09 /28 /8 3 4.85 JOHNSON T E R E SA L SUPPLIES 283G65 09/28/83 30986 JOHNSON TERESA L TRAVEL TZAINI46 35.71 283J20 09/28183 _ _ - -..282000 _.MET CENTS ... —PROD SU2 282.00 + 283J24 09128/83 13.00 BRANDAO ANTONIO TRAVEL TRaINiyG 2g3 J24 .09/28/83. .. —BRANDAO ANTONIO --__.- _..TRAVEL TRAINING ' 00 TRAVEL TRAINING REFUND EVALJaTION REFUND 283K23 0- 9/28/83 1640 KROPELNICKI MILDRED REFUND 16.00 ta.•wswr.r_.Jwr1TTn+YY/• +r- u]!r >ra1 st.•sf.rwsIliw.saro rr _. .. _ {/' _ : .... 09/28183 5.30 GREEN PHYLLIS L ~ ": - - X,r 1983 . CITY OF MAPLE WOOD 5.30 C"ECK REGISTER s CMEC_K_N0. 09/28/83 DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTIO' 16.00 so:283K21 09128!83 350.00 3-283. 4 09/28/83 161 ,00 STATE OF MM DISP OFFICE 283K22 09/28/83 16.00 JUELICH L =NA 16.00 8 283K07 09/28/83 32.00 ALBERT ERNIE REFUND s `32.00 283KO8 09/28/83 7070 ANFANG ANDREA SUPPLIES 7.70 j 3 J I14 283KO9 09/28/83 16.00 BALLARD FRANCES REFUND 16. 283KIO 09/28/83 12000 SAUER DONNA REFUND 12.00 283K11 09!28/83 13.00 BOREEN RENE REFUND 13.00 283K12 09/28/83 32A0 CARLSON "ELEN REFUND 2 f 32.00 * 283K13 09/28/83 32.00 CARLSON ORVILLE REFUND 32 .0 0 t- r ! ._ f 283K14 09128/83 32.00 DUFOUR SYLVIA REFUND 32.0 0 283K15 09/28/83 198030 OYNA PIED SUPPLIES 198.00 283K16 09/28/83 163.45 FEDERAL EXPRESS SHIPMENT 163o45 f 3E:!283K17 09128/83 19.95 FRONTLINE PURL BOOKS 3y'19.95 t 283K18 09/28/83 16.00 GOULD CATi;RINE REFUND TRAVEL TRAINING REFUND EVALJaTION REFUND 283K23 0- 9/28/83 1640 KROPELNICKI MILDRED REFUND 16.00 283K19 09/28183 5.30 GREEN PHYLLIS L ~ ": - -5.30 283K20 09/28/83 16.00 GUSTAFSON MARION 4B 16.00 so:283K21 09128!83 350.00 HOBERT PIA RTIN 350900 : 283K22 09/28/83 16.00 JUELICH L =NA 16.00 TRAVEL TRAINING REFUND EVALJaTION REFUND 283K23 0- 9/28/83 1640 KROPELNICKI MILDRED REFUND is OAt1/Yw'.r^ ._• ' . ].' .r 7 i 1953 CITY OF MAPLE WOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO.D AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DES : R IP TI 01 16.002 4 Z83K26 13.00 MONN JULIE TRAVEL TRAINING09/28%83 13.00 283 K 2 5- ------IY9 f'2$ - -410 NATURE SHOD SUPPLIES 283K25 09l28183 16.40 MATURE SHOD SUPPLIES i 57o52 V 283K26 09/28/83 195.00 OSTR3M MARGE TRAVEL TRAINING 195.00 r . . 283K?? 09128la3 t6.Dfl PAWLAK RACHEL REFUND 16.05 - - -_ t . 283K28 09/28/63 16.00 RODE ADELE REFUND 16.0 0 283K29 0912$/83 275.00 SIDESHOW PRODUCTION 4TH OF JULY 275.00 283K30 D9/28/83 77.50 SOFTWARE TRAINING CO OFFICE SUPPLIES 77.50 283K31 09/28/83 57.00 23.00 STATE OF MN DOCUMNTS STATE OF MN DOCUMNTS BOOKS BOOKS 283K31 09/28183 13-283K32 09/28/83 60.26 TWIN CITY ENGINE t: SUPPLIES VE-i 60,@26 283K33 0 20.93 UN IV OF NO FLORIDA _ -BOOKS 20.93 4283K34 D9/28/83 20.00 UNCL_ r OAKS CO -REPAIR M4IlT VE} 20.00 V ` 263K35 09/28/8 61 U.S.STEEL CORP MATERIAL& INSTAi 1490011 a .,2s3K3b 0 9/28/8 3 16.00 WALKER DFLORES REFUND 28 3 K 3 7 0 9 / 28 /a3 32.00 VEST NAOMI _. _..- -_ - - -- -REFUND 0 4 ... 283K 9 28/x3091 43.89 WORLD WIDE INC FUEL OIL 43 9 283K3 09128f83 12 098.00 HERTZ COR' .-CONTRACT PYM k 12 , 0 98.0 0 FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL 3 ,FUND 03 TOTAL HYDRANT CHARGE t E:l r rOIilrCiaPV +iY.l drw asJM.sO.is . - ... y.. .L- .r r-. -r'. -, ..- .•sYS>.ae --- ..+r •..tix. _r•_r.e -._- = '_'-^..• _ 0 CHECK REGISTER A NOUN T VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 6,149.00 FUND 11 TOTAL PARK DEVELOPMENT 124084.98 FUND 12 TOTAL STRE_T CONSTR STATE AID 39.3 T FUND 36 T 074E -10 -05 BE A M A V /HZ LWD- WB A 39.38 FUND 37 TOTAL 71 -15 BEAM A V /HZLWD - HY 6 11925 FUND 39 TOTAL 4 -1 g CNTY DTCH 17 ST. SW 33o75 FUND 41 TOTAL 75 -16 YT q SY ST I M R V 82.35 FUND 47 TOTAL 78 -10 HILLWOOD DR /DORLAN 22 FUND 50 TOTAL 78.24 BEAM A V/ W. FA M HY 6 576.85 FUND 55 TOTAL 80 -05 W B AVE /B TO HY 36 55, 508.28 FUND 58 TOTAL 80 -1 O HY 61 FR NT G ROAD 70302 FUND 68 TOTAL 81 -16 AC3RN GREMSE 1,270.83 FUND 75 TOTAL 82wO9 FROST /BRMNGHM -WB A 205640 FUND 81 TOTAL 82 -19 CR E STV IE W OR WATER 4x752.00 FUND 88 TOTAL 63 -D8 CRESTVIEY FOREST 455;84 FUND 89 TOT A1.83 -9 HOLLOWAY /MCKNIGHT 2,071.79 FUND 90 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER FUND 1 FUND 94 TOTAL DENTAL SELF-INSURANCE 2488.23 - --96 TOTAL VEHICLE a EQUIP M INT 395, 824x08 TOTAL 1 INDITCA.TFS is ITEMS FII`ANCED BY RECREATIONAL FEES t i CITY OF MAPLE WOOOD AYRULL•CHECKS RESISTER CYCLE BU15 CHECK DATE U9 - Z3 - 83 PERIOD ENDING 09 -16 -83 PAGE i DEPT -NO EMPL -NO EMPLOYEE 'JANE CHECK -NO AMOUNT CLEARED 0002 484 3696 71 BEHM LOIS N 0919 -x0001 462.62 t 0002 206242018 EVANS BARRY R 0919 4M00002 1 •1 52.77 t 0002 1 X615.39 + 0010 473664474 JAHN DAVID J 0919 -00003 123.63 0010 4 7514 34 03 PELODU I N ALFRED J 091 9 -00004 90009 t 0010 469869481 SCHLEICHER JOHN F 0919 -00005 0000 0010 213.72 + 0011 475500285 MCPHERSON JOANNE F 091 9-00 00 6 0000 t X 0011 0012 357340166 CUDE LARRY J 0919 ..00007 153.21 t 0012 470520124 DOHERTY KATHLEEN M 0919 -00008 371.70 t I 0012 471400908 ZUERCHER JOHN L 0919 -00009 119.48 0 012 64 4.39 + 0021 469501318 FAUST DANIEL F 0919 =00010 119014.68 t 0021 19014o68 + 0022 469200614 HAGEN ARLINE J 0919 -00011 462.73 l _ 0022 3904441446 MATHEYS ALANA K 0919 , m00012 505.94 t f 0022 4176 7044 32 MOELLE R MARGARET A 0919 -00013 0000 t X 0022 473327550 VIGOREN DELORES A 0919 -00014 391.63 t....1 0022 106000 + 0031 471322198 AURELIUS LUCILLE E 0919.00015 851.76 t 0031 474264816 SELVOG BETTY 0 0919 -00016 513.04 t 0031 1 *364.80 + 0033 477286389 GREEN PHYLLIS C 0919 -0001 l ._.554.10 0033 472244994 HENSL EY PATRICIA A 0919@&00018 19409 t 1 0033 476620547 KELSEY CONNTE L 0919 -00019 144.18 t I 0033 476269515 SCHADT JOANNE L 0919 - 00020 168.20 0033 468364435 VIETOR LCRRA I'NE S 0919 -00021 421.55 t 0033 1 v482.22 t 0034 037144969 FRED= RICKSON RTTA M 0919 -OD022 0000 t X 0034 474097528 STOTTLEMYER EDITH G 0919 -00023 100000 1 0034 100*00 + 0041 184440036 BASTrR DEBORAH A 0919 -OJ 024 318.24 1 0041 K 4 68 461717 COLLINS KENNETH V 0919 -00025 65 CITY OF MAPLEW0000 AYROLL- CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8018 CHECK DATE 09 -23.83 PERIOD ENDING. 09ml 6 -83 PAGE 2 DEPT -NO EMPL -NO EMPLOYEE VAME CHECK -NO AMOUNT CLEARED 0041 392240565 HAGEN THOMAS L 0919 -00026 455.28 0041 477227636 DMATH JOY E 091.9 -oOD027 391.58 0041 471 502356 R ICHI E CAROLE L 0919-00028 329.07 t I 0041 468602934 SVENDSEN JOANNE M 0919 -00029 490047 t 1 0041 2 9 249.97 0042 477481364 ARNOLD DAVID L 0919 -00030 414.24 4 0042 471 4021 15 ATCHI SON JOHN H 0919-00031 694.79 t 0042 4 69 6898 67 B OWMA N RICK A 0919w00032 515e73 t 0042 468461930 CLAUSON DALE K 0919 -00033 233.08 t 0842 4 ?6 44 611 0 R E 0-ett*R e 2-4 VOID - 0042 470267887 GREEN NORMAN L 091 9-00 035 672.62 t 0042 469 56 8516 HALWEG KEVIN R 0919 -00036 5 59.07 t 0042 469820466 HEINZ STEPHEN J 091 9 -00037 570.09 t I 0042 473604916 HERBERT MICHAEL J 0919 - 00038 560.28 t 0042 392760009 KARTS FLINT D 0919 -00039 469.62 t 0042 472222231 KORTUS DONALD V 0919 -00040 167.72 t 0042 4 71 56.3591 LANG RICHARD J 0919 -00041 552o92 t i 0042 468181347 MCNULTV JOHN J 0919 -00042 225.51 0042 474 60 76 86 ME EHAN t JR JAMES E 0919 -00 043.606.76 t 0042 471627417 METTLER DANIEL B 0919- 00044-697.81 t 0042 469442063 MOESCHTER RICHARD M 091.9 -00045 178.73 t 0042 476340990 MCRELLI RAYMOND J D91 9 -00046 688.47 t 0042 475323183 NELSON ROBERT 0 0919 -00047 729.41 t 0042 468462884..,PELTIER WILLIAM F 0919- ©0048 691.57 4-V. 0042 470520457 SKALMAN OONALD W 0919 -00049 213.68 c I 0042 473548226 STAFNE GREGORY L 0919 -00050 641.95 0042 471721204 STEFFEN SCOTT L 0919 -00051 176,21 0042 471500251 STILL VERNON T 0919 -00052 609.33 t 0042 471629204 ST CCKTON DARRELL T 0919 -00053 713.41 t 0042 474260130 ZAPR JOSEPH A 0919 -00 054 664.41 0042 13 9020.62 t 0043 475 5484 34 BECKER RONALD 0 0919 -00 05 5 216.75 t 0043 469441789 GRAF DAVID M 0919 -00056 560.73 t 0043 LEE .ROGER lw 0919 - 000057 675.75 1 _.4 0043 473567791 MELANDER JCN A 091%w00058 72.80 t 1 0043 468360918 NELSON CAROL M 0919 -00059 877.25 t 3043 471504316 RAZSKAZOFF DALE E 0919 -00060 62706 t 0043 471564901 RYAN MICHAEL P 0919 -00061 430.95 t 1 0043 474486D71 VORWERK ROBERT E 0919 -00062 278.57 t 0043 469502201 YOUNGREN JAMES 6 0919- 00063 69405 t 0043 4 9 43 4.47 0045 471401878 E MBER TS ON JAMES M 0919.00 064 68708 t 0045 472242227 SCHADT ALFRED C 0919 -00065 744.62 0045 1 p431.8Q 0046 468401899 CAHANES ANTHONY 6 0919 -00066 1 40.54 1 1 CITY OF MAPLE WOOOD DAYR OLL- CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE BD) S CHECK DATE 09 -23 -83 PERIOD ENDING 09=16-m83. PAGE 3 DEPT-NO EMP L -NO EMPLOYEE NAME CHECK - NO AMOUNT CLEARED 0046 4776272 36 FL AUGHE R JAYME L 091 9 -00067 481.95 t 1 0046 473807930 MARTIN SHAWN M 0919 -00068 425.83 t 1 0046 4 72 365919 NELSON KAREN A 0919 -00069 445.16 t 0046 468600183 RABINE JANET L 0919 -00070 428.28 t f 0046 475363333 WILLIAMS DUANE J 0919 -OD071 503979 t, 0046 2, 465.55 0051 471440267 BARTA MARIE L 0919 -00072 271.08 t 0051 473566872 HAIDER KENNETH G 0919 -00073 216.64 t 0051 5044831 74 WEGWE RTH JUDITH A.0919 -00 074 367.11 t 0051 854.83 D052 496308314 CASS WILLIAM C 0919-00075 628.97 t Aw 0052 471526254 FREBERG RONALD L 0919 -00076 357.03 t 0052 474788580 GONTJES JOHN A 0919 -00077 31.96 t 0052 502544337 HELEY RONALD J 0919 -00078 567.00 t OS2 471501241 KANE MICHAEL R 0919 -00079 419.09 t 0052 468363473 KLAUS ING HENRY F 0919 -00080 447.89 0052 475601431 LUTZ DAVID P 0919.00081 437.76 t 0052 471500547 MEYER GERALD it 0919.00082 460.15 t 0052 476904500 OSWALD ERICK 0 0919 - 00083 213.85 t 0052 468166755 PRETTNER JCSEPH 8 0919- 00084 747.14 t 0052 472241484 REINERT EDWARD A 0919 -00085 571.83 0052 47034 TEVLIN949 HARRY J 0919 -00086 578.37 0052 S t 461.04 0053 472 481010 ELIAS JAMES G 091 9-0008 7 664.38 t f a 0053 167 246109 GE ISSLER WALTER M 091 9 -00088 600.58 t 0053 501464671 GESSELE JAMES T 0919 -00089 781.92 t 0053 398 527954 HOUSE MARY.P:0919 -00090 266.66 t I 0053 475441688 PECK DENNIS L 091 9 -00091 511008 t 0053 476622458 PILLATZKE DAVID J 0919 -00092 0000 t K f 0053 472.662522 PR IEBE WILLIAM 0919 -00093 501.00 t 005 3 i 76 82b763 THEME JOHN R 091 9.00 094 162079 t 0053 3 94198.41 0054 473683775 LOFGR E N JOHN R 0919 -00095 403.53 t 0054 403953 0058 471562563 BREHEIM ROGER W 0919 -00096 547.94 t 0058 47492.7128 CAHANES JOSEPH A 0919 -00097 0.00 t X 0058 477602582 EDSON DAVID B 0919 -00098 575.08 t 0058 470841590 MULWEE GEORGE W 0919 -00099 541.83 t M.0058 471501014 NADEAU EDWARD A 0919 -00100 490.92 t 0058 468361720 MUTES ON LA VERNE S 0919 -00101 4 64.13 0058 471365993 OWEN GERALD C 0919 -00102 571.75 t 0058 3 R 1 V 1.65 R tl w r w r O CITY OF MAPLE WOOOD AYR OLL- CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE B01a CHECK DATE 09 -23 -83 PERIOD ENDING 09.1 6.83 PAGE DEPT -NO EMPL -NO EMPLOYEE 44 ME CHECK -NO AMOUNT CLEARED 0059 476249760 FACDONALD JOHN E 0919 -00103 482.57 t 0059 475501000 MULVANEY DENNIS M 091 9-00 10 4 638.25 t 0059 19120 0061 477301066 BRENNER LOIS J 0919 -00105 93984 t 0061 468341993 KRUMMEL BARBARA A 0919 -00106 144 4 0061 473260389 ODEGkRD ROBERT D 0919 -OD10T 917.49 t UP61 468 582618 STAPLES PAULI NE 0919 -00108 599o74 t 0061 i P 75 5.44 0062 473709024 BA UER ALAN H 091 9 -OD 10 9 0000 t K) 0062 471447219 BURKE MYLES R 091 9-00 110 83.17 0062 474608182 GERMA IN DAVID A 0919 -00111 558.98 t 0062 472 303411 GUSINDA MELVIN J 0919.00112 872.47 t 0062 474924209 HAAG MATTHEW J 0919- 0f1113 24.4.95 t 0062 502 5441 21 HELEY ROLAND 8 0919 -00114 610..93 t 0062 473969784 HUNTER TCNY 0919 0-00115 115.36 t 0062 471748313 LIBHAROT THOMAS 0 0919 -00116 0.00 t X I 0062 473565506 MARUSKA MARK A 091 9 -0011 7 651.65 t 0062 468941946 PETERSON PAUL 6 091 9 -w00 118 82000 t 0062 474078128 RASCHKE ALBERT F 0919.. 00119 228.48 t 0062 477646662 SANDQUIST THOMAS J ,091 9 -0012D 0000 t X I 0062 476203439 _.SANTA REED E 0919 -00121 133o23 0062 4736600 35 STARK RICHARD E 091 9 -00122 0000 t x 1 0062 475904189 TO MICHAEL F 0919 -00123 0000 t x I 0062 47768/931 TOWNLEY PATRICK J 0919 -00124 0 t X I 0062 475745266 WARD TROY G 091 9 -00125 0000 t X : I 0062 469 721242 WARZEKA RICHARD A 0919 -00126 253.67 t 0062 398-34o89 0063 469 8472 53 A NFANG ANDREA M 0919 -00127 0000 X I 0063 471801203 ASHTON KATER I D 01119 -00128 0.00 t K 1 0063 475783041 BA RTZ WE NDY L 0919 -00 129 Go 00 0063.. ..._._._.......46 BESETH RONALD L 0919 -00130 .._0 .._.._...X. - - 0063 270483797 BLACK WTLLIAM J 0919 -00131 0.00 t K 0063 472 362015 AORASH DONNA F 0919 -00132 257o88 t 0063 471 901502 BOYD JEFFREY A 0919- 110133 0000 t K ) 0063 474442474 BUNKE RTCHARO N 0919 -00134 0.00 t X . I 0063 476924605 CASSEDAY ELIZABETH J 091 9-00 135 0.00 t X 0063 473684976 CASSEDAY MARY K 0919 -00136 0000 t X 1 _ 0063 469987145 CASSEDAY ROBERT 0 0919 -00137 0000 t X 1 0063 468684857 CERNIUS DAVID G 0919 -00138 0000 t X I 0063 388 5696 49 COLLIER MICHAEL W 0919 -0013 9 21.04 t 0053 4 72 84 4611 D ALLJ GE MATTHEW 0 0919-&00 14 D 0000 t K 1 0063 469441338.DE MARS SANDRA L 0919 -00141 312.48 t 0063 470880293 DELMONT LISA M 0919- 00142 0000 t X 0063 474829219 D IEBEL JERRY D 091 9 -00143 0000 C x 1 0063 476 721245 DOUGHTY LINDA R 0919 -00 144 0000 t X I CITY OF MAPLEWOOOD PAYROLL•CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8018 CHECK DATE 09 -23.83 PERIOD ENDING 09 -16.83 PAGE 5 DEPT-NO EMP L -NO EMPLOYEE NAME CHECK -NO AMOUNT CLEARED 0063 473925557 FOWLER MARY K 0919 -00 14 5 0000 C X: 0063 474177310 GALBRAITH CHRIS 0919.00146 0600 t K 0063 471884448 GALBRA ITH MICHAEL D 0919-00147 0000 t X 0063 469983628 GRAF MICHAEL 091 9-00 14 8 0000 t X I 0063 475 9215 68 HAAG PAUL T 0919 -00149 0.00 t X 0063 474847811 HE IMERL CAROL 091 9 -03 150 0000 t K 0063 476686996 HERBER KARIN J 091 9-00 151 0900 t X I 0063 477981805 HOKENS ON KA RI 0919 -00152 0000 t K 0063 469806100 JOHNSON TERESA L 0919 -00153 0.00 t X 1 jam 0063 470680548 KIELSA KARI J 0919 -00154 0000 t X 0063 4 73 74710 1 KLASSEN AMY L 0919 -00155 0000 t X 0063 474 743915 K ORTUS JAMES M 091 9 -00156 0000 t X 0063 4719285 57 KRATZKE LORI E 0919 -OD 157 0000 K 0063 468984615 KRUMMEL BECKY J 0919 -00158 0000 t X 0063 477829499 KRUMMEL ROGER C 0919 -00159 0000 t X 0063 4'69929687 KYRK JODI A 0919 -00160 0600 t X 0063 474889823 LANGELETT STEVEN E 091900161 0000 t X.I 0063 4699535 53 LARKI N MOLLY A 091 9 -00162 0000 t X.I 0063 472484219 L E CLA I R MARY L 091 9 -0016 3 0000 t X) 0063 472880498 LOEFFLER CAROL J 0919 -()0164 0000 t x 01063 473700729 MAHRE MICHELE A 091 9 -00165 0000 t X I 0063 473869923 MCCOLLUM JULIE A 0919.00166 0000 t X I 0063 474966150 MIHELICH CINOI L 0919 -00167 0000 t.X 0063 475 927550 MOTZ JULIE A 0919 -00168 0000 t X I 0063 473903922 NIELSEN RCNALD C 0919- 00169 0000 t x I 0063 474745/23 NOESEN CR IST I N A 0919.00170 0000 X I 0063 473 565827 OLSON -ROBERTA J 091 9 -0D 171 0000 t K 0063 476863802 PAULETTI ANTHONY A 0919 -00172 0000 t X..-I 0063 477629606 RASCHKE JEFFERY J 0919 -00173 37.35 t 0063 471 864228 REVOIR STEVE4 J 091 9 -00174 0000 t -it ) 0063 472986940 R ICHIE STACY L 091 9.00175 0000 t X.I 0063 469900639 R08ERTS PAUL 1 0919- 00176 0.00 t X 0063 469927221 ROTH VINCE C 0919 -00177 0000 t X 0063 468 946400 R YDE4 DENISE 0919-00176 0000 t X 0063 473686517 SANOOUIST KATHRYN E 091 9 -00179 0000 t X I 0063 469888185 SHERBURNE GWEN 0919 -00180 0000 t K 0063 396604919 SI04NIGER SARAH J 0919.00181 0 t K I 0063 ..--.--...,.SPAN48AUER DAWN M 0919 -00182 0000 t X I _ 0063 477869D67 469742645 SPANNBAUER KATHLEEN G 091 9-00 18 3 0.00 t X t 0063 474845176 SPANNBAUER MARTIN J 0919 -00184 0 0063 480641463 STOUT - MILLER DEBORAH 091 9 -OD 185 0000 t f( 0063 4779201 70 STRAUS LAURA J.0919 -00186 0000 t X 41 o 63.476861186 SULLIVAN JULIE 0919 -00187 0000 t X 0063 472821395 SULLIVAN NANCY J 0919 -00188 0000 t K 0063 471528238 TATE PETER W 0919 -00189 0000 t X I 0063 470626422 TAUBMAN DCUGLAS J 0919 -00190 557.83 t 0063 534382341 TEWINKEL CHARLES G 0919 -00191 0000 t X 0063 477881708 THELL THOMAS L 0919 -00192 0000 t X 0063 470963203 WALLACE JCN T 0919 -00193 0.00 t X 1 0063 475747342 WARD KERI L 091 9 -00194 0000 t X 1 0063 396324246 WARD ROY G 0919 - 110195 264.83 t 0063 r 472980309 WARNSHOLZ PAUL M 0919 -00196 0.00 t X CITY OF MAPLE WOOOD 3 AYR OLL- CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8018 CHECK DATE 09 - - PERIOD ENDING 09 - -83 PAGE 6 DEPT -NO EMPL -NO EMPLOYEE VAME CHECK -NO AMOUNT CLEARED 0063 476746732 WATERS JOSEPH D 0919.00197 0000 t K 1 , 0063 1 9451.41 D064 151440508 GREW JANET M 0919 -00198 482.50 t 1 0064 471384624 HORSNELL JUDITH A 0919 -00199 245,60.1 996 8 e90019 29 6 27400 1 1 VOID 0064 19002080 0 " 071 389448993 CHLESECK JUDY M 091900201 334.19 t 0071 410 5605 51 OLSON GEOFFREY W 091.9 - 20 2 779.18 t 1 0071 19113,37 0072 4776271 78 El STRA NO THOMAS G 0919- 00203 484.34 t j 0072 475608505 JOHNSON RANDALL L 0919 -00204 550969 0072 1 ,035.03 t 0073 476090677 OSTROM MARJOR IE 091 9-00 20 5 76409 t 0073 764.19 f 0074 387520776 WENGER ROBERT J 0919 - 1!0206 531.72 t I 0074 531.72 * COUNT 00206 GRAND TOTAL 579407.06 0001 477058088 ANDERSON NORMAN G 0919 -00 207 105081 t j 0001 483621318 BASTIAN GARY Y 0919 -00208 256.57 0001 468200109 GREAVU JOHN C 0919. 00209 250.40 t 1 0001 477367538 JUKEZ FRANCES L 091.900210 230.36 t G 0201 472369035 MAIDA MARYLEE T 0919 -00211 258.21 r ODOR o .3s • COUNT 00211 GRANO TOTAL 0.042 476446119 Dreger Richard C 0.91900212 755, 56 0064 474542163 Souther Christine 091900213 277.15 NN Minnesota b Department of Transportation District 9 5 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Box 2050 OF TRP •North St. Paul Minnesota 55109 779-1100 612 1 September 20, 1983 Action by Ccul y Mr. Kenneth Haider City Engineer Endorse 1902 East County Road B Modifies Map lewood, Minnesota 55109ReJecte Dear Mr, Haider:Date SUBJECT: Traffic Signal Agreement No 61794 TH 49 (Rice St.) at C SAH 25 (C . R. B) In Maplewood, Ramsey County C.P. 83 - 12 Attached are four (4) copies of an agreement between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, Ramsey County., and the City of Maplewood covering the cost, maintenance, and operation of a traffic signal on T.H. 49 (Rice St.) at C SAH 25 (C o. Rd . B) . If this agreement 'meets with your approval, kindly present it to the City Council for their approval and execution. The Corporate Seal should be affixed to all copies of the agreement and all copies of the resolution. When the agreement has been executed by the City Council, all four (4) copies are to be returned to this off ice, together with four (4) certified copies of a resolution authorizing its officers to sign it on its behalf, After the agreement has been executed by the proper County and State officials, a certified copy will be returned to you for your files. Sincerely, 1 Kermit K. McRae, P.E. District Engineer Attachments: iEC €QVED SEP z CITY C L ` An Equal Opportunity Employer r MINNESOTA-TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT NO. 61794 BETWEEN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE COUNTY OF RAMSEY AND THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD# MINNESOTA FOR A Traffic Control Signal with Street - Lights, Signing and Emergency Vehicle Pre - emption System on Trunk Highway No. 49 Rice Street) at County State Aid Highway No. 25 County Road B) in Maplewood and Interconnection to the existing traffic control *signal on Trunk Highway No. 36 South Ramp at Trunk Highway No. 49 (Rice Street) in Roseville, Ramsey County. C.P. 83 -12 Prepared by Traffic Engineering ESTIMATED AMOUNT RECEIVABLE Oit of Ma lewood $20,000YP AMOUNT ENCUMBERED None t erwise Cove re THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the "State the County of Ramsey, hereinafter referred to as the "County "; and the City of Maplewood, hereinafter referred to as the "City ", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the State has determined that there is justification and it is in the public's best interest to install a traffic control signal with street lights and signing on Trunk Highway No. 49 (Rice Street) at County State Aid Highway No. 25 County Road B) in Maplewood; and WHEREAS, due to the close promixity of this intersection to the Trunk Highway No. 36 /Trunk Highway No. 49 interchange, it is operationally desirable to interconnect the proposed traffic control signal to the existing traffic control signal on the Trunk Highway No. 36 South Ramp at Trunk Highway No. 49 (Rice Street) in Roseville; and WHEREAS, the City requests and the State agrees to provide an Emergency Vehicle Pre- emption System, hereinafter referred to as the "EVP System ", as a part of said traffic control c signal with street lights and signing installation in accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 161.39, the .Commissioner o.f Transportation may upon request provide technical and engineering advice, assistance and supervision to any county or municipality; and 61794 1- WHEREAS, the materials, equipment, labor and miscellaneous items necessary to constructsstruct, operate, maintain, - revise and remove said EVP System shall be at the sole cost and expense of the City; and WHEREAS., it is considered in the public's best interest for the State to provide a traffic signal cabinet with control equipment to operate said traffic control signal and Emergency le Pre-emption control and. interface equipment. to operate said.Vehic p system at the sole cost and expense of the City; and WHEREAS, the City, County and State will participate in the cost maintenance and operation of the traffic control signal with street lights, signing and interconnect work and EVP system as hereinafter set forth. STOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City shall prepare the necessary plan, specifications and proposal and shall perform the engineering requireded to complete the items of work hereinafter set forth at the cost and expense of the City. 2. The State. shall perform the inspection required to complete the items of .work hereinafter set forth at the cost and expense of the State. It is agreed, however, that the City and e p County shall have the right to periodically inspect said construction work 30 The contract cost of the work except the-cost of providingrovidin the power supply to the service pole or pad and the cost 61794 2_ for the State furnished materials, shall constitute the actual Construction Cost" and shall be so referred to hereinafter. 49 The City shall install or cause the installation of a traffic control signal with street lights, signing and interconnect work in accordance with City Project No. 83 -12 made a part hereof by reference. Construction costs snali oe Dorne entirely by the City. 5: The City shall install or cause the installation of an EVP System for said traffic control signal installation at the sole cost and expense of the City. 6. The State will furnish to the City a traffic signal cabinet with control equipment to operate said traffic control signal and emergency vesicle pre - emption control and interface equipment to operate said EVP System to be installed with the City work p paragraphsprovidedforin 4 and 5. Estimated cost of $20,000gP for State furnished materials shall be borne entirely by the City. 7. The City shall install or cause the installation of an adequate electrical power supply to the service pole or pad inc-ludin g any necessary extensions of power lines at the cosh and expense of the City. 8. Upon execution of this agreement and a request in writing by the State, the City shall advance to the State an amount equal to one hundred (100) percent of the cost for State furnished materials based on the estimated cost specified in paragraph 60 61794 3- 90 Upon providing the State furnished materials specified in paragraph 6 to the City, and compilation of the actual costs, that amount of funds advanced by the City in excess of its respective share will be returned without interest and the City agrees to pay to the State that amount of its share wrich is in excess of the amount of the funds advanced by the City. 10. Upon completion of the traffic control signal with street lights installation, the County shall provide necessary electrical power for their operation at the cost and expense of the County. 11. Upon completion of the work contemplated in Paragraphs 4 and 5 hereof; it shall be the County's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to: (1) maintain the luminaires; (2) relamp the traffic control signals and street lights; and (3).clean and paint the traffic control signals, cabinets, luminaire mast arms and pole shaft extensions. It shall be the State's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to perform all other traffic control signal and street light maintenance. 12. The State shall maintain overhead signing provided for in paragrapr 4 at no cost to the City or County. 13. The EVP System provided for in paragraph 5 hereof shall be installed, operated, maintained, revised or removed in accordance with the following conditions and requirements: a. All modifications, revisions and maintenance of the EVP System considered necessary or desirable, 61794 4_ . for any reason, shall be done by State forces, or, upon concurrence in writing by the State's Traffic Engineer, may be done by others all at th-e cost and expense of the City. b. Emitter units may be installed and used only on vehicles responding to .an emergency as defined in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 169.01, Subdivision 5 and 169.03. Vehicle emitter units used in the City shall be installed only under a City permit approved by the State's District Engineer or his duly appointed representative. c. The City shall maintain and require others using the EVP System to maintain a log showing the date, time and type of emergency for each time any traffic signal covered hereby is actuated and controlled by the EVP System, and that said logs shall be made available to the State upon request. Malfunction of the EVP System shall be reported to the State immediately. d. In the event said EVP System or components are, in the. opinion of the State, being misused or the conditions set forth in paragraph b above are violated, and such misuse or violation continues after receipt by the City of written notice thereof from.the State, the State shall remove the EVP 61794 5- System. Upon removal of the EVP System pursuant to this Paragraph, the field wiring, cabinet wiring and other components shall become the property of the State. All infrared detector heads and .indicator lamps mounted external to the traffic signal cabinet will be returned,to the City. The detector receiver and any other assembly located in the traffic control signal cabinet, which if removed will not affect the traffic control signal operation, will be returned to the City. f. All timing of said EVP System shall be determined by the State through its Commissioner of Transportation. 14. Upon proper execution by the City and State, the EVP System for the traffic control signal on Trunk Highway No. 49 (Rice Street) at County State Aid Highway No. 25 (County Road B) shall become a part of signal Maintenance Agreement No. 1629 -R between the City and State covering operation, revision, maintenance and removal of EVP System by State forces at the cost and expense of the City. 15. Any and all persons engaged in the aforesaid work to be performed by the City shall not be considered employees of the State and any and all claims that may .or might arise under the Workmen' Compensation Act of this State on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of 61794 6 - said employees while so engaged on any of the work contemplated herein shall not be the obligation and responsibility of the State. 16. Timing of the traffic control signal provided for herein shall be determined by the State, through its Commissioner of Transportation, and no changes shall be made therein except with the approval1 of the State . COUNTY OF RAM S EY APPROVED AS TO.FORM: County Attorney By Chairman of the Board Dated County Seal) RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL County Attorney Chief Clerk - County Board CITY OF MAPLEWOOD APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City Seal) By Mayor Dated By City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: District Engineer Operations Division DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By Assistant Commissioner Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION: DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION By Special Assistant Attorney General General - State of Minnesota Dated: 61794 g_ RESOLUTION NO. BE IT RESOLVED.that the County of Ramsey enter -into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to-wit: To install a traffic control signal with street lights, signing, interconnect work and Emergency Vehicle Pre- emption System on Trunk Highway No. 49 (Rice Street) at County State Aid Highway Yo. 25 (County Road B) in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and contained in Agreement No. 61794, a copy of wr ich ' wa s before the Board. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper County officers be and hereby are authorized to execute such agreement, and thereby assume for and on behalf of the County all of the contractual obligations contained therein. CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Ramsey I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the Board of the County of Ramsey_ at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the day of 1983, as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession. Chief Clerk- County Board Seal) BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the -following purposes, to-wit: To provide a traffic control signal with street lights, signing, interconnect work and Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption System on Trunk Highway No. 49 (Rice Street) at County State Aid Highway No. 25 (County Road B) in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and contained in Agreement No. 61794, a copy of which was before the Board . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers be and hereby are authorized to execute such agreement, and thereby assume for and on behalf of the City all of the contractual obligations contained therein. CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Ramsey City of Maplewood I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the Council of the City of Maplewood at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the day of 1983, as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession. r. City Clerk..- Treasurer F Seal) - r MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner SUBJECT: Code Amendment -- Parking Lots APPLICANT: City of Maplewood DATE: September 14, 1983 SUMMARY F __ Action by Council: Endorse Modif i e d.., Rejecte , Date _ Request Revise the zoning code to establish minimum parking lot dimensions. t Reason for Change 1. The Community Design Review Board requested that staff study the city's current parking lot requirements to see if they are realistic for today's vehicles 2. The City requires 10 by 20 foot parking stalls with 24 -foot wide drive aisles. The majority of the site plans submitted to the City propose 9 foot wide stalls that are 18 to 19 feet deep. 3. There are no uniform standards in the zoning ordinance. Ten by twenty foot s t a l l s are required in the R -3, multiple dwelling and CO, commercial office district, while 8 by 20 foot stalls are required for gas stations. There are no standards for other zoning districts. In these districts, the design review board requires 10 by 20 foot stalls. Comments The benefits of the proposed ordinance are: 1. More green area in multiple - dwelling developments, because of less asphalt. 2. Reduced cost to developers due to less blacktop and concrete curbing. 3. The city's ,as well as developer's time, would be saved by fewer parking variances. The disadvantage of reducing the parking space width to nine feet is that the potential for door nicks' wou 1 d increase. Although it is a definite disadvantage to get one's car doors nicked, staff feels that nine -foot wide spaces are still a rather comfortable and safe space: Sixty -five percent of the cities surveyed permit nine -foot wide spaces (.See page 4 . ) Eighteen -foot deep spaces, when abutting a curb, sidewalk or landscaped area, would suffice, since cars typically overhang beyond the space one to two feet. Even the larger vehicles, like the 18.5 -foot long Chevrolet Ki ngswood Estate Wagon (see page 4 } , would only need a parking space 15.5 -to 17.5 feet deep g r d for employeesStafffeelsthatparkingareasreserved onl ma be smaller. Theseveyy spaces would not have the rapid turnover that parking spaces would at other areas. The potential for door nicks would also be much less. FeIl ow employees, in 9 eneral , are more considerate of their associates' vehi-cles. The aisle widths staff has proposed for the various angles of parking space arrangement were derived from a parking study prepared by the engineering firm of Barton- Aschman. Staff is also proposing to formalize in ordinance our current policy of requiring continuous concrete curbing around parking lots. This requirement is important because: 1. Concrete curbing holds up longer. Bituminous and timber curbs are sus- ceptible to damage by snowplows and are generally much shorter lived, there- fore, there is much . 1 ess of a maintenance problem with concrete. 2. Continuous curbing is important to contain and direct storm water run -off and also serves as a wheel stop to protect landscaping. Recommendation Adoption of the proposed parking ordinance amendment reducing the minimum stall width and length, and creating an ordinance requirement for continuous concrete curbing around parking lots. A 3 BACKGROUND Sample of Car Dimensions Make'Dimensions (width/length- in feet) VW Bug 5 x 13.5 - Mercury L i nx 5.5 x 14 VW Rabbit pickup 5 x 14.5 Dodge :Aries 5.5 x 14.5 Oldsmobile Omega 5.5 x 14.5 Ford F 100 (full size pickup)6.5 x 16.5 Ford van 6.5 x 17 Chevrolet Caprice 6.5 x 17.5 Ford Torino 6.5 x 17.5 Chevrolet Ki ngswood Estate Wagon 6.5 x 18.5 Procedure 1.recommendation by `the Planning Commission 2.First reading by' City -Council 3.Recommendation from the Community Design Review Board 4.Second reading and hearing by the City Council ic Attachments: 1.Survey of communities closest to Maplewood in population and adjacent communities 2.Proposed ordinance 3 SURVEY OF ADJACENT COMMUNITIES White Bear Lake 8.5 SURVEY OF METROPOLITAN COMMUNITIES N. St. Paul 9 CLOSEST TO MAPLEWOOD IN POPULATION Oakdale 9 x 20 8 -30 -83 Woodbury 9 x 20 Stall Dimensions when Newport Parking Stall abutting curb, sidewalk City Dimensions or landscaped area Coon Rapids 9 x 18 9 x 16 Eagan 10 x 20 10 x 18 Brooklyn Center 8' 8"x 19.5 8' 8" x 18 Burnsville 9 x 18 no change Plymouth 9 x 18.5 Fridley TO x 20 Blaine 9 x 20 Crystal 9.5 x 20 New Brighton 9 x 20 New Hope 10 x 20 Golden Valley 9 x 20 White Bear Lake 8.5 x 20 Apple Valley 10 x 20 South St. Paul 9 x 20 Roseville 9 x 18 Columbia Heights 9 x 20 Cottage Grove 9 x 20 Shoreview 9 x 20 SURVEY OF ADJACENT COMMUNITIES White Bear Lake 8.5 x 20 no change N. St. Paul 9 x 20 Oakdale 9 x 20 Woodbury 9 x 20 Newport 10 x 20 Roseville 9 x 18 Vadnais Heights 9 x 18 9 x 16 St. Paul 9 x 18 9 x 16 8 x.16 compact) , Aisle Width 24 24 24 24 26 25 24 24 22 24 No specified requirement 24 24 20 24 22 No specified requirement 24 24 No specified requirement No specified requirement 24 No specified requirement 24 24 20 Attachment 1 4 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE SIZE OF PARKING STALLS THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): Section 1, Section 36 -6 (Definitions) is hereby amended to read as follows: Parking Space: An open space . or a garage on a lot, used for parking motor vehicles, the- area- ef- wh +Eh- 4s - eet - less- thae - twe - hundred - ferty 249-square-feet-and to which there i access from a street or alley. Section 2. Section 36 -22 (off - Street Parking) is hereby amended to read as follows: a Not less than two (2) off - street parking spaces, eeesst4eg -e € -at 4east- twe- huedred- ferty- (248) -square - feet -eaEb with proper access from - a street or alley, shall be provided on any lot on which a main building is erected. The following types of uses shall provide additional off - street parking space, as indicated, unless otherwise authorized by the city council, which parking space shall have proper access from a street or all ey and shal l_ be located on or near the l on which such use-is situated: 1) Single- family dwelling: two (2) spaces, as provided above. 2) Multiple dwelling: two (2) spaces for each housekeeping unit. 3) Hotel or tourist cabin court: one space for each rental room or suite. 4) Restaurant, cafe or tea room: one space for each fifty (50) square feet of floor space devoted to patron use. 5) Theater, auditorium, church or other place of public assemblage: A minimum of one space for every four (4) seats. Schools must have a.minimum of one space for every twenty (20) auditorium seats. 6) Commercial, office or recreational b u i l d i n g use, other than those specified above, having a total floor on ground area of more than one thousand (1,000) square feet: One space for each two hundred 200) square feet, or portion thereof, of ground or ground-floor area, plus one space for each three hundred (300) square feet, or a portion thereof, of upper-floor area , i n excess of one thousand (1,000) square feet. 7) Manufacturing and warehouse establishments: One space for each two (2) employees. Off- street parking facilities existing at the effective date of this paragraph (June 22, 1972) shall not subsequently be reduced to an amount less than that required under this paragraph for a similar new building or use. Off- street parking facilities provided to comply with the provisions of this 5 Attachment 2 of this paragraph shall not subsequently be reduced below the requirements of this paragraph. Nothing herein shall be construed to alter or amend any provision for off - street parking contained in division 8 of article III of this chapter for SC Shopping Center. Districts. (Code 1965, § 912.060; Ord. No. 319, § 912.160 6- 22 -72; Ord. No. 470, § 1 6 -7 -79) Each parking space shall be not less than ' n i ne feet wide and nineteen feet in length, exclusive of access aisles. If a parking space abuts a curb, sidewalk or landscaped area, the length of the space may be reduced to eighteen feet. Parking spaces designated for employees only" may be-reduced to a minimum width of 8 1/2 feet. All spaces shall be served by access aisles of the following widths, based on the angle of the parking stalls: Parking Angle Aisle Width 90 60 45 24 feet two -way traffic) 19 feet one -way traffic 16 feet one -way traffic All parking lots shall have continuous concrete curbing surroundin the exterior perimeter of the lot and dries. Section 3. Section 36 -109 (Off- street parking /residence district -- Multiple Dwelling) is hereby amended to read as follows: 2) Minimum parking stall size shall conform to the size re uirements of Section 36 -22. be- tee -184- feet -by- twenty- 28 - feet w4tb -a Hi4r4riuFfl- teta4 -ef- six- baedred- f4fty- X658 } - square- feet - per- dwell4eg uR4t 4pEled4eg-- maeeever!eg -area. X64- A44- park4Ag- 4ets- sbal4- have- 64tuRinees- er- eeRerete -curbs ; -wh4eh -are te- serge- as- whee4- steps - aed te- a4d -R- the- dspes.4eg- ef- surfaee rue -ei=f- water- away -freRi- the- dwel4ieg- erts -and -parks Rg -let -aed 4ete a - eeRimeR reeepter serv4rg- the - E4y7 1 " 6) Where a garage or carport opens to a public street, the width of the, driveway onto the public street shall not exceed twenty- four (24) feet in width, and in no event shall a series of garages open directly to that street. Where a series of garages face each other on a private road, the minimum width separating garages shall be thirty (30) feet in order to provide visibility in backing our or turning around. (Code 1965, §. 906.070; Ord. No. 231, § 1 10-5-67; Ord. No. 245 § 4 (§ 906.030) 10-3-68-0 Section 4. Section 36 -140 (off - street parking requirements /Commercial Office District) is hereby amended to read as follows: g) All parking spaces shall conform to the size re uirements of Section 36 - 22. rieasdre ten - 183- feet- 4e- w4dtb - apd- twenty- 29)- feet- 4R -4 eRg th aed- sha44 be- prev4ded w4tb - twenty -f4ye- feet- w }de- aeeess drove: 0 Section 5. Section 36 -157 (off- street parking /motor fuel stations) is hereby h amended to read as follows: . c) A- Automobile parking spaces at a motor fuel station ether -thap or at a truck stop shall be- a- spaee-ef -at -lea st- e!9ht- 8)- by_tweety -__284 feet conform to the size requirements of Section 36=22 d) A truck parking space at a truck stop shall be at least ten ( 10) by fifty 50) feet3 emeept- that ; - eRe -hal-f -ef- the- requ4red- spaees -at -a- truek- step- riay be -ef- the - eight - X84- by- tweety k20) -s4ze- Secti on 6. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota this day of 1983. L • , Mayor Attest: City. Clerk Ayes -- Nays -- 7 D. Code Amendment -- Parking Lots Secretary Olson said the proposal is to revise the zoning code to establish parking dimensions and create an ordinance requirement for continuous concrete curbing around parking lots. Chairman Prew asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment on the proposal. David Briggs, Woodmark, said he is in favor of the proposed amendment. Commi ss i oner Ell of son moved the Planning Commission recowmend the Ciy Council adopt the p gposed . ar_ki ngordi nance am reduci na the minimum stall widt a 1 enth, and create an_ordiname -re.o i ri n9 continuous concrete cur aroun ark n .9 1 o Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Barrett, Ellefson, Fischer, Hejny, Prew, Robens, Si gmundi k, Whitcomb MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager Action by Council FROM: Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner SUBJECT:* Parking Variance = Endorse LOCATION: Parkway Drive Modified--_._,APPLICANT /OWNER: Woodmark, Inc. Rejecte PROJECT: Somerset Ridge Date DATE: October 3 , 1983 SUMMARY Request Approval of a parking variance to provide nine by eighteen foot arki nP 9 spaces at Somerset Ridge. Code requires ten by twenty foot spaces. Comments • While staff is recommending a code amendment to allow nine-foot wide parking.stalls, there is no unique hardship that would justify a variance for this site. If Council feels that nine -foot wide stalls are acceptable for a multiple dwelling project, the Code s*houl d be amended to allow this for all projects. Recommendation No action need be taken if Council approves the preceding ordinance. If hP9to ordinance is not approved, this variance should be denied, on the basis that it does not meet the intent of the current ordinance and there is no hardshipuniquetothesite. BACKGROUND Site Description 1. Site area: 14.04 acres - 2. Existing land use: Maple Hills Golf Course Surrounding Land Use No abandoned railroad right-of-way, North of 'th are singledwellings Southerly:. Bennington Woods condominiums under construction b 'y the appli-cant and a single dwelling Easterly: office building, singlee dwel l in s and P '9 g Parkway Dave Westerly: Mount Zion Cemetery Past Actions 8- 23 -83: The Community Design Review Board approved building and sPPgto plansforSomersetRidge, subject to eighteen conditions. Condition number thirteenstated 13. Park.i ng stall dimensions shall be subj to the ap f 'pp o the CCouncil, because of the request for 9 by 18 foot stalls. Parkin - Related Past Action 9-27-82: Council approved a arki n variance for the applicant'sP9pplcants BenningtonWoodsdevelopmenttoallow9by18footparkingstalls. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 1. Land . Use Plan designation: RH, high density residenti9y1 and OS, open .space 2. Zoning: R -1, multiple dwelling residential; R -4 sin le dwelin99residential; F, farm residential, 3. State law requires that the following findingsndins be mad 'g e before a variance can be granted. a. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. b. The variance would be in keepin with the spirit and intent of9p the ordinance. Undue hardship" as used in connection with the rantin 'g g of a variance means . the property in question cannot be put to a reasonabl use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by. the landownerandthevariance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. 2 Procedure 10 Recommendation by the Community Design Review Board (completed)2. Public hearing and decision by the City Council jw Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line Map 3. Plans date - stamped 7 -26 -83 3 I L D36 LARK 1VEE AURIE RD. t ELDRIDGE IJl t BELMONT LA. I SKI Loa N o AV brL I it Y t VERNON LWOOD AVE. t j A V s .o Z ST. PAUL 19 RKE V. I E AV. dELONT GERVAIS f " } LARK i 25 J Y Cr F ,ELAWJ t o JuM TIpH Ei t 1 tH N J o R W I RFC > 0 — f ROST FIF M AVE. J - r FRISDIE 3 R [ f R 50 P IA z F- 62 . A P LOCATION MAP 4 60 Attachment 1 4 N 46 jpp br if dOb pot A s? • A . ' Lk . - 4 L OC - a •. A 2 r 1 - rjw -5 dC. I Imp mono 1' Lol 10 de • T _.SSA. ..._. • v- - t o5 - 1767 -. r r-- "b ILI Li I; c t *4NIII do ft 147 is , .• z •. a t 1 5_ - 4 ` 1 o AL w tv - a le Hill -Bennington Woods Under Construction f ce Bnter t o. t - ' tj ap 140 w o ' 6 s f for w ft-mv 7-C iso4 L ARPENTLU R X V Awl 00 lz JUN 2 1961 W.H R. SCALE 1 P /ZONING MAP Attachment 2• E. Variance -- Parkway Drive (Somerset Ridge) Secretary Olson said the request is for approval of a parking variance to provide nine by eighteen foot parking spaces at Somerset Ridge. Staff is recommending this item be tabled until after the Council has reviewed the proposed parking code.amendment. , Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission table t'hi s re lIg until after the Council revi the parking code amendmen Commissioner Hejny, seconded Ayes--Commissioners Barrett, El lefson, Fischer, Hejny, Prew, Robens , Si gmundi k, Whitcomb t ' MEMORANDUM Action by Coancii: TO: City Manager Endorse FROM: Director of Community Development Modi.fie SUBJECT: Prel imi nary Plat - Re ecte LOCATION: Roselawn Avenue Edgerton Street and Ripley Avenue d- - -- APPLICANT: :Dave Morris g p Date OWNER: Robert Clausen PROJECT: Clausen Addition DATE: September 14, 1983 Request The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval for 22 lots'. The plat would be developed in two phases. Comments • This is an update of a previously approved plat. The proposed plat, with staff recommended conditions, would meet all City codes and policies. Recommendations Approval of the preliminary plat received on August 18, 1983, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall provide on -site ponding to control the rate and volume of runoff to adjacent property to pre-development levels. Drainage easements shad l be provided for the proposed pondi ng. 2. A drainage easement and piping shall be provided along lot lines to drain the Nursing Home parking lot to the southerly pond. 3. The second phase of the final plat shall not be approved, unless the Council orders a public improvement project to extend water from Edgerton Street to Bradley Street. 4. Approval of a final grading, drainage and utility plan before final plat approval. 5. Entering into a development agreement for public improvements before final plat approval. 6. The developer shall construct a temporary asphalt path on the west side of Edgerton Street, from Roselawn to the south edge of the plat on Edgerton Street. BACKGROUND Site Descriptio Gross area: 10 acres Net area: 9.2 acres 1 Existing land use: Undeveloped Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: The Maple Manor Nursing Home .and two single dwellings. Easterly: Edgerton Street. East of Edgerton Street is the Forest Lawn Memorial Cemetery and a water ponding area on the west side of Edgerton Street. Southerly: Ripley Avenue. South of Ripley Avenue are single'-dwelling homes . Westerly: Undeveloped land zoned F, Farm Residential and planned for RL, Low Density Residential use. Past Actions 5- 21 -70: The City Council denied a rezoning the the subject property from F, Farm Residence to R -3, Multiple for the following reasons: 1. The unresolved storm sewer situation at that location, with particular respect to the ponding area. 2. Sufficient case for rezoning was not made. 3- 13 -78: The Park and Recreation Commission recommended that the south 4.8 acres of the plat be acquired for park purposes. 6- 12 -78: After an appraisal was done, the Park and Recreation Commission recom- mended that the City not purchase the Clausen Addition property, due to the high appraisal cost. 7- 19 -79: Council approved a preliminary plat and rezoning to R -1, similar to the current proposal, subject to the fol 1 owi ng conditions: 1. The final plat shall not be approved, unl ess a public easement is obtained on the property at the northwest corner of Edgerton Street and Ripley Avenue, that will guarantee the ponding capacity shown on the Maplewood Drainage Plan. 20 A storm water piping system shall be provided from the westerly edge of the property to the drainage easement between lots 1 and 2, block .2 and al so along said easement from proposed Bellwood Avenue to the southerly pond. 3. A drainage easement and piping shall be provided along lot.lines to drain the nursing home parking lot to the southerly pond. - 4 4. A storm water ponding easement shall be provided for that p art of the subject property below elevation.864. 5. The southerly 100 feet of Outl of A shall be designated as Outl of B and combined with the nursing home property to' the east. The remainder of Outlot A shall 2 _ be combined with the adjacent property to the north. Both deeds shall be held in escrow by the City Attorney to be filed after the plat-is recorded. 6. The final plat shall not be approved, ujless the Council orders a public improvement project to extend water from Edgerton Street to proposed Sunrise Court, 7. The developer shall construct a temporary asphalt path on the west side of Edgerton Street, from Roselawn to the south edge of the plat on Edgerton Street. _ 8.' Dedication of an additional 16.5 feet for 1EdgertonStreet. —9 ; 7- 16 -81: Council ordered the water main extension on Ripley Avenue. 8- 20 -81: Council awarded the contract for the water main extension, subject to a developer's agreement and surety. The developer could not provide the surety and the project was abandoned. 9 -4 -82: The time period for preliminary plat approval expired. PI anni ng 1. The property is designated for RL, Low Density Residential use. 2. The proposed! density is only 8.6 people per net acre. This is substantially under the 14 people per net acre allowed by the Land Use Plan. 3. The lots would all meet or exceed Code requirements. 4. Zoning: R -1, single dwel 1. i ng residential Public Works Sanitary Sewer 1. The Property is served by a 12 -inch sanitary sewer running through the center of the property on an existing easement. Sanitary sewer facilities also exist on Roselawn Avenue, Edgerton Street and Ripley Avenue. 2. All sanitary sewer improvements would be internal. Water 1. Water i's avai 1 abl a to the northern part of the plat from Roselawn Avenue and Edgerton Street. 2. Water would have to be extended from Edgerton Street along Ripley Avenue for the southern portion of the plat. This extension would provide only dead -end service. Review of the overall area does not seem to warrant a more. extensive water main project. Council had previously ordered this project. The developer however, could not provide his share of the costs. 3. Water main extension would be a public improvement project. The 2nd phase of the final plat should not be approved, unless the Council orders this project. 1 Streets 1. The external streets serving the property are all adequate, except for Ripley Avenue. A complete upgrading of Ripley Avenue is not justified yet. Repatchi ng, however, should be done. 3 - 2. Edgerton Street is designated as a minor arterial on the Ci Land Use Plan and currently has a 66 -foot right -of -way. 3. The County Major Street Plan calls for a 99 -foot right -of -way. An additional 16.5 feet would be dedicated on the west side of Edgerton• Street. 4. The internal streets proposed are all acceptable, Bellwood A-v nue should beP paved on the west property line. — 5. Bellwood Avenue would eventually be extended into the property to the west and then north to Roselawn Avenue. Storm Water 1. The Maplewood Drainage Plan calls for the pondi ng of water on portions of the southern part of this plat. Nineteen acre feet of storage are required in a group of ponds, main portion of which is located to the east. (See encl copy from drainage plan.) 2. The entire nineteen acre foot pond is not requ as a result of this ro osal .P P The developer should, however, provide pondi ng to control the additional runoff to pre - development levels. 3. A drainage easement and piping facility should be required from Bellwood Avenue, north along a side lot line to drain waters from the nursing home parking lot. It is not necessary to have a detailed plan prepared at this time, as the final design of these facilities will be reviewed by the Engineering Department. Parks 1. The city's park plan includes this site in a search area for a neighborhood park. 2. The Park and Recreati Commission, on June 12, 1978, recommended that the City not acquire the Clausen property, because of the high cost. The Commission de- cided to consider the purchase of land to the west. Public Safety 1. Section 29 -52 (a) (4) of City Code states that, "Sidewalks shall be placed near school heavi traveled areas, and other locations when approved by the * Ci ty Council." 2. The developer should be required to construct a 4 -foot asphalt path on the west. side of Edgerton, from Roselawn Avenue to the south border of his plat - a distance of about 620 feet. 3. The need for this path is based on the fact that Edgerton School is located at the northwest corner of Edgerton Street and Roselawn Avenue and that Edgerton Street is a heavi traveled road. Edgerton will be the only access for children in the proposed plat to Edgerton School, 40 Since Edgerton Street has not been upgraded to its final width, a temporary asphalt path should be provided in lieu of a permanent concrete sidewalk. This will provide needed safety for the school children at a minimal cost to the developer. 4 - Procedure I. Planning Commission recommendation 2. City Council holds a' public hearing and makes a decision. mb Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Preliminary Plat 4. Drainage Plan 5 - I-ITTLE CANADA 35 R0A Q' Soy dy Lake c SIELAWN 1 3 S f M (K* a K SUMMER AVE.t rtm ow AVE 6 i L N z ~ G W 44 W 7.7 ST. PAUL t adage@ - — k—N— f 28 27 I " 6 t Lott t J L c } A f cq c X30 J134 t,.c ` ,T: 500 3, 0 530 .Ir o X30 Sa apl a Manor Milo 1 00 r Nez4C., N 0 ~ ur ng Hom 4 - - - rIV-1 I- - - - r, a a•: _ r ! t to 7- - t rr 1 t 1 b54 011 - - iD at . 2.S 4 4 . t 8 ac Gfl Cu 1 c 5A ON f tS4 1 t 1 ST . PAUL C E tai A T A 3 70• • b 1 1 6f .- 7 iPo.7 c E,i• 84a/'" , !7? ' ? ' * .• 340 ' V i Cemetpr ,. 3 2 1 ? :: J G t D' Z v rIIIII- - 4N01 _ f I 1 5 j 2O 25 .4 I Ck 2*5 - : lam? zz OwlV) 4)1 ?bl 21 15 177 _ _r . - .. y s V Cr 1 > k. TQ --• Q i PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Attachment Two 7 - u N ice 1 ;ir fe r " $ ,I wr r •r •I • Ir • I A.: AvEuE' ,r a.ti• . A06FLawK ` J `• A GE Iwo Y• Ina G, Zw A64 ALF 4— —r_ w i w -w• 1 ` P ASE- to Alr ON. S Zt , ; ... •... tL"rr T • • rw • •'" ^, T 'ALL.. . 1`!' ! O P- Z6 Ile ti QA • r r, w Inrl • Or t AloOft do . -+ rr•J7r ;/ / • u "' . •tomy7i dad Gap 6.49 Mu & f % ' fir 1 tOF •% If ' • ! jt AV If Map Eo p OF a f a i .4. f «, yam .;,' • • , .lw 1000" GO GO * 4 qw GIG PHASE • j ; 1 I r Fo • r d e Mr w.. M r • f QIOC E . — A .. ........... _ 1:: 4'. w.r • rrr t • • dw !WO Jr C 1 w • w • • PRELIMINARY PLAT gFm Attachment Three 4 N 1 i - S 1• p3Ar i . W 7dr a` 1 W • W • u t i 1 rj 3C- 24 IN f J < < a eo Ar j DRAINAGE PLAN 9 - 0 Attachment Four C. Preliminary Plat--Clausen Addition Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval for 22 lots. The plat would be developed in two phases. Staff is recommending approval of the request as outlined in their report. Commissioner Hejny moved the Planning.—Commission recommend to the City Council approval of - the preliminary 1 at received on August 18- 1983 subject the fof l owi nQ conditions : 1. -The developer shall provide on -site ponding to control the rate and volume of run -off to adjacent property to predevelopment levels. Drainage easements shall be provided for the proposed pond i ng. 2. A drainage easement and piping shall be provided along lot lines to drain the nursing home parking lot to the. southerly pond. — 3. The second phase of the final plat shall not be approved, unless .the Council _orders - a public improvement project to extend water from Edgerton Street to Bradley Street. 4. Approval of a final grading, drainage and utility plan before final plat approval. . 5. Entering into a development agreement for public improvements before final plat approval, is 6. The developer shall construct a temporary asphalt path on the west s i de of Edgerton Street, from Rosel awn to t south edge of the plat on Edgerton Street. Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Barrett, Ell Fischer, Hejny, Prow, Robens, Sigmundik, Whitcomb f MEMORANDUM TO:City Manager FROM:Associate Planner -- Johnson SUBJECT:Lot Width Variance LOCATION:2108 McMenemv Street APPLICANT /OWNER:Martha Wegl eftner " DATE:September 14, 1983 SUMMARY Action bar . C ounc i 1: Endorsed-..-.._._.._ Modified._,. Re J e c t e d:,.. Date Request A corner lot frontage variance of approximately seventeen feet. Propo - s al 1. See enclosed maps. • 2. The proposed lot split l i n e would be located four feet west of the steps for the existing dwel 1 i*ng. (Three feet for a standard width sidewalk plus a one -foot setback to the new property line.) 3. The new corner lot would have approximately 83 feet of frontage on Eldridge Avenue. Code requires a minimum' of 100 feet, Comments This variance request meets the reauirements for approval, which are: 1. The intent of the zoning code would be compl.i*ed with. A dwelling can be constructed on this property to conform with. all setback requirements, including the established neighborhood setback of forty feet from McMenemy Street. 2. A hardship exists which is unique to this property. The existing dwelling is located in the middle of the parcel. This dwelling is older, predati nq Maplewood's - zoning code requirements. If the existing house had been located farther to the east, a variance would not be necessary. Further, four other similar sized corner lots (page 6) have been developed in this neighborhood. Recommendation Approval of the enclosed resolution (page 7 } , approving a corner lot frontage variance of approximately seventeen feet, the east l i n e of the proposed corner 1 ot. to be located four feet west of the steps for the existing home at 2108 McMenemy Street, subject to: 1 . The lot split l i n e shall be identified by land survey monuments. 2. The setback to McMenemy Street shall not be less than that of the existing dwel l i.ngs along both. sides of the street (about forty feet),, unless written permission is received from affected property owners to locate closer, in accordance with City Code provisions./ 3. Payment of sewer and water cash connection charges. BACKGROUND Site Description Size: 134 x 188.61 feet Existing Land Use: A long time established single dwel 1 -i ng on the portion of the si -te. -. Surrounding Land Uses North: Single dwel 1 i ngs , set back about forty feet from McMenemy Street East: Single dwellings South: Eldridge Avenue. Across the street is a single dwelling, set . back from McM.enemy 'Street about forty feet West: McMenemy Street across the. street are single dwellings set back from the street about forty feet. 11-8-82: Council approved a corner lot width variance at 1775 East County Road C. Two of the five findings which have application to this case were: 10 • The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance in that all setbacks can be met. 2. Most. of the developed corner lots in the neighborhood have less frontage than the proposed lot. The four undersized corner lots in this neighborhood (page 5) were created and developed in the late 1950's, prior to the adoption of the present corner lot frontage requirement of 100 feet. Pl anni ng 1. Land Use Plan designation: RL, residential lower density 2. Zoning: R1, residence district (single dwelling) 3. Maximum allowed densi 14 people /net acre. The lots in this area are generally larger than the required minimum (page 5 ) . The proposed lot division would not cause a densi problem. 4. Compliance with land use laws: a. State law requires that the may be granted: 1.l S tri.c t enforcement would unique to the " indi.vi dual 2) The variance would be in ordinance. - following findings be made before a variance cause undue hardship because .of ci rcu~ stances property under consideratiof, J keeping with the spirit and intent of the 2- Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance - means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. . The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the .l andowner, and the variance, if granted, wi 1.1 not alter the essential,. character of the locality, b. Ordinance: 1) Section 30 -8 (f) (2) of city code requires a minimum corner lot width and depth of 100 feet. The proposed lot width is about 83 feet. A variance of about I.7. feet is required, 2) Section 36 -70 states that the yard area of a single dwelling which faces any street shall be at least as deep as the predominent existing setback, unless a different setback, of not less than thirty feet, is approved in writing by not less than fifty percent of all of the owners of property within 300 feet of the proposed building location, Citizen Comments Fourteen property owners within 150 feet of this property were surveyed. Of the eleven respondents, six are opposed, four are in favor and one had no opinion. Reasons for objection were: 1. The proposed dwelling would be closer to McMenemy than existing dwellings, causing a traffic problem and poor aesthetics, 2. A precedent would be, set for others, 1. Planning Commission recommendation 2. City Council decision, following a public hearing. mb Attachments i. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 30 Site Plan Map 4. Resolution 3 - 2S J W cc •'•r l: a LITTLE CANADA l• rAU 0 h LOCATION MAP Attachment 1 4 N IL 4C r fir t X . C i OQ OQ o8O D ,, a• -, ••- lsif 3a - Z , h C; C3; 0 oIW r147 2 C ! 711 w AN erj bo ON 4j__ orfr V .96 137.1to to Platted 1 T 1 2 r •.: 1 : 2090 or, 3 3 c• Ydr - C T _ : • :. • •.. , •,• rte, I . i . 1 IV H R a 1 *0 I V T (1 v 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 t 8 9 •1 Itoo n g7 $1 87 s1 01. : e So 7s 7S T S goo ¢ • .+ « d pt•G 0 7S 7S 75 75 N1 •A B D I T I23x4 .8 9 10 1156732 00. Ira AW r•c 3 1!. 124 :3 a ICA 0%rD 24i _ _ . oftI7T7 kor zS 24 24 , it 2 3 8 , It • . -- 22 9 22 1 1 ti y l M 12 13 14 15 M n 7s !DD 15 : 75 -:s loo 1 12 13 14 1 R r c If h' a JAMA vo 1p r •. -- ' If LIP - C rzi i PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP Developed Substandard Corner Lots Attachment Two 5 L 0 • T N S a 4 s SC lint 4z i a-> T ti NJ i i I 1 1 l C 1 0 I 1 I 1 PROPOSED LOT DIVISION Attachment Three not to scale) iF rba 40 -- 0 • T N S a 4 s SC lint 4z i a-> T ti NJ i i I 1 1 l C 1 0 I 1 I 1 PROPOSED LOT DIVISION Attachment Three not to scale) iF Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City ouncil of the City f Maplewood, y • y pewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council Chambers in said City on the day of 1983, at 7:00 P . m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Martha Wegl ei tner applied for a variance for the following-described property: Lot 1, Block 1, Edgetown Hei hts, Section 17 Townshiphip 29, Range 22. This property . i s also known as 2108 McMenemy Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, section 30- 8(f)(2) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires corner lots to have 100 feet width and depth; WHEREAS, the -appl i cant is proposing an eighty -three foot wide corner lot, re q ui r-i n a' vari ance of seventeen feet; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on August 10, 1983. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on 1983. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said variance be . 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on , 19 to consider this variance. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and Plan- ning Commission, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The City has approved comparable corner lot width variances in the Ppast. 2. The resulting lot would be in keeping with the spirit and i ntent of the code because all setback requirements could be met. 3. The existing house was constructed prior to adopting of City zoning codes. As such its placement presently precludes compliance with minimum lot frontage requirements. 4. Four similar sized corner lots have been developed in this neighborhood. 7 - Attachment Four Approval is subject to: 1 . The lot split l i n e shall be identified by land survb Y monuments. 2. The setback to McMenemy Street shall not be less than that of the existing dwellings along both sides of the street (about forty feet),unless written permission . is received from affected ro ertPPY owners to locate closer, in accordance with City Code provisions . 3. Payment of sewer and water cash connection charges. Adopted this day of 19830 Seconded by Ayes -- 3 STATE OF MINNESOTA } COUNTY OF RAMSEY } SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ' ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed-Clerk of the Cityy o Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully comparedtheattachedandforegoingextractofminutesofaregularmeetingoftheCityYofMaplewood, held on the day of 1983, .with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript there- from insofar as the same relates to that lot variance request. Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the Cit this day of 1983. Y 8 - B. Variance--2108 McMenemy (Wegleitner) Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting approval of a corner lot frontage variance. Staff is recommending approval of the request as outlined in their report. Walter Wegl ei tner said he had no further comments to add to the report of staff. They presently have a problem with pedestrian traffic going over the lot when going to and from the convenience store in the neighborhood. This is a large lot for the owner to maintain. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Conmi ss i on recommend approval_ of the ro osed corner lot fronts e variance of approximately seventeen fe f - p CQrner -]Qt -to be located four fe-et west of the steps for the exi hom at 2108 McMenrnfly str Jollowinq resolution be forwarded to the City Council r WHEREAS, Martha Wegl ei tner applied for a variance for the following- described property: Lot 1, Block 1; Edgetown Heights, Section 17, Township 29, Range. 22. This property is also known as 2108 McMenemy Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, section 30 -8 (f) (2) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires corner lots to have 100 feet width and depth; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing an eight -three foot wide corner lot, requiring a variance of seventeen feet; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the above-described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: The City has approved comparable corner lot width variances in the past. 2. The resulting lot would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the code because all setback requirements could be met. 3. The existing house was constructed prior to adopting of a city zoning codes. As such its placement presently precludes compliance with minimum lot frontage requirements, 4. Four similar sized corner lots have been developed i,n this neighborhood. Approval is subject to: 1. The lot split line shall be identified by land survey monuments. 20 The setback to McMenemy Street shall not be less than. that of the existing dwellings along both sides of the street (about forty feet) , unless written permission is received from. affected property owners to locate closer, in accordance with city code provisions' 3. Payment of sewer and water cash connection charges. Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Barrett, El 1 of son , Fischer, Hejny, Prew, Robens, Si gmundi k, Whitcomb MEMORANDUM SUMMARY Reouest - A plan amendment from RM, residential medium density to SC, service commercial, RH, residential high densi and RL, residential low density. Reason for the Request 1. No specific -development is proposed. The city council initiated the plan amendment to` commerci at a joint meeting with the planning commission on May 16. The council would l i k e to plan an area for a variety of commercial services that are convenient to residents of this area. Staff is proposing an area of high density residential to - compensate for the loss of density from the SC amendment and to buffer the single dwellings from the proposed commercial development. 2. A commercial center, of the size proposed, usually consists of convenience goods stores with a grocery store as the anchor tenant. It would probably have less than 100,000 square feet and would require a population of 5,000 to 40,000 people to support it. Such centers usually need five to ten acres.l Issues There are two issues to decide: 1. Should this site be designated for commercial use now or wait until a specific development is proposed? Comment: State law requires that if the plan is amended, the site must be rezoned within months. The advantage of a change now is that a si zoned for commercial would be more attractive to a developer. The disadvantage is that council would have to accept whatever use is permitted in the zoning district chosen. Lawrence Livingston, Business and Industrial Development, in The Practice of Local Government Planning ed. I CMA (Washington D.C. ,1979),p. 248. Action by Council: TO:City Maner Endorse .,.... FROM:Director of Community Development Mo dif i e d SUBJECT:Plan Amendment ReJecte LOCATION:S. E. Corner of Lower Afton Road and McKnight Road _`--.- Date APPLICANT:City of Maplewood OWNERS:Arnold Johnson (2299),Gary Ketch (328), Edward and Barbara Katzmarki (338) , Mark and Mary LeC1 ai r .,( 346) ,Tim and Lei 1 ani Lee (358) and Marie Johnson (2271) DATE:August 9, 1983 SUMMARY Reouest - A plan amendment from RM, residential medium density to SC, service commercial, RH, residential high densi and RL, residential low density. Reason for the Request 1. No specific -development is proposed. The city council initiated the plan amendment to` commerci at a joint meeting with the planning commission on May 16. The council would l i k e to plan an area for a variety of commercial services that are convenient to residents of this area. Staff is proposing an area of high density residential to - compensate for the loss of density from the SC amendment and to buffer the single dwellings from the proposed commercial development. 2. A commercial center, of the size proposed, usually consists of convenience goods stores with a grocery store as the anchor tenant. It would probably have less than 100,000 square feet and would require a population of 5,000 to 40,000 people to support it. Such centers usually need five to ten acres.l Issues There are two issues to decide: 1. Should this site be designated for commercial use now or wait until a specific development is proposed? Comment: State law requires that if the plan is amended, the site must be rezoned within months. The advantage of a change now is that a si zoned for commercial would be more attractive to a developer. The disadvantage is that council would have to accept whatever use is permitted in the zoning district chosen. Lawrence Livingston, Business and Industrial Development, in The Practice of Local Government Planning ed. I CMA (Washington D.C. ,1979),p. 248. Because of the proximity of surrounding commercial centers, this site may not develop commercially. The landowner would then have to seek a plan amendment from a future city council, 2. Should the adjacent RM land be changed to RH to compensate for the density lost with the SC amendment? Comment: r Over the past few years, council has been slowly reducing' the RM and RH 1 and i n the city by changing the plan des i gnati to RL and commercial. At the joint meeting with the planning commission in May, council directed the planning commission to consider further density reductions. Amending the plan from RM to SC would allow the same number of housing units as was planned with the whole area RM: This is a good area for RH with condominiums to the east, townhouses to the south and proposed commercial to the north. The single dwellings to the west would be protected by the city's recently passed ordinance which riqui res at least a fifty -foot set - back and screening for the multiple dwellings from the s,i ngi e dwellings. The disadvantage is that the RH use would create more traffic. The existing roads, however, are designed to handle this traffic. Recommendation Approval of the enclosed resolution which amends the Comprehensive Plan from RM to SC, RH and RL, with.the understanding that a change back to residential in the future would not be objectionable if the property owner requests it. 2 - BACKGROUND Site Description Acreages: 62 acres proposed for SC 18h acres proposed for RH - 2 acres proposed for RL 27 acres total Existing land use: undeveloped, except for a single dwelling on Londin Lane and five single dwellings at the corner of Londin Lane and McKnight Road. Surrounding Land Uses e Northerly: Lower Afton Road and Battle Creek Park Easterly: Connemara-condominiums Southerly: Londin Lane and high density townhouse projects Westerly: McKnight Road, Shamrock Plaza and apartments Attachment one . ( page 5) shows the location of existing commercial centers. Th.ei r distances from the plan amendment site by road are as follows: Shamrock Plaza (convenience services) -- adjacent Sun Ray Shopping Center (full service) - -12 miles Valley Creek Mall (full service) - -1 3/4 miles Upper Afton and Century (convenience services) - -2 miles Pa St Arf i nn 7 -1 -71: Council approved a PUD for 375 apartment and townhouse units. This PUD expired in 1972. Planning I. Land Use Plan deisgnation: RM 2. The RM classification "is designated for such - housing types as single-family houses on small.lots, two - family homes, townhouses, and mobile homes. The maximum population density is 22 people per net acre" (p. 18 -30). 3. The RH classification "is designated for such housing types as apartments, two - family homes, townhouses, nursing homes, dormatori es , or elderly housing. The maximum population. density* is 34. people per net acre" (p. 18 -30) . 4. The SC classification "is oriented to faci l 'i ti es which are local or community- wide scale.. While a full range of commercial uses is permitted in this dis- trict, certain types of facilities which may be of a high - intensity nature, such as fast food restaurants, discount sales outlets, gas =stations, and light industrial uses, should be permitted subject to specific performance guidelines. The objective of establishing this district is to provide for a wide variety of commercial uses, compatible with the character and develop- ment of.the neighborhoods in which they are located" (p. 18 -31)49 r 3 5, The RL classification is primarily for single dwellings. 6.. The five single dwellings on the corner of McKnight Road and Londi n Lane should be changed to RL to reflect the actual use. The - proposed RH to the north of these homes will provide a buffer from the commerci=al to the north. A good example of this is the multiple dwellings north of Sun Ray Shopping Center. T The proposed SC designation was chosen because council wanted the widest variety of commercial uses possible. 8. Lower Afton Road is planned as a major arterial street. The 1979 Barton - Aschman Transportation Plan proposes that Lower Afton Road be expanded to four lanes in the future. McKnight Road is planned as a minor arterial street. Londi n Lane is planned as a minor collector. 9. Zoning: F, farm residence z 10. Section 473.865, subdivision 3 of State law states that "If an official control conflicts with a comprehensive plan as the result of an amendment to the plan, the official control shall be amended by the unit within nine months following the amendment to the plan so as to not conflict with the amended comprehensive plan." This means that the city must rezone this property within nine months so as not to conflict with the Plan if this amendment is approved. Public Comments . 1. Arnie Johnson the property owner, had no objections 2. The property owner at 338 McKnight had the following-objection: There is enough traffic (vehicle and pedestrian) around this area, a commer- cial in this area, would only add to that. We have lived in this area f ve years now,. and each year it gets continually worse. With the amount of children in this area, and with the heavy traffic of McKnight Road, it can only be one thing, and that is dangerous." • 3. See enclosed letter from the.City of St. Paul (page 8 j. ADMINISTRATIVE Procedure 1--. Planning Commission:.public hearing and recommendation to the city council 2: City Council decision (majority vote required) 3. Metropolitan Council review mb Attachments 1. . Location Map 2.. Property Line Map 3. Vista Hills Land Use Plan 4. Letter: Ci ty of St. Paul 5. Letter: Arnie Johnson 4 - 6. Resolution SUN RAY SHOPPING CENTER 4LL t. o = sr10 A Ddr0A . 3q0 ` ; TH ST. I . v2ND ST N. Sr N. b. U 94 HASTINGS >r o_ z SCIINVI UBUR i - ; v : o I t ST STN. UBURB N L MUDSO u ' . G y > `, s v V Y 1 • . M. I = s iBROOKVWo12o 4 •E scN. jRLA o RIDE RD. 4) Z W . € a O ZH PARK n MA ER U. w o Battle Creek j LA < aba Lake ErmrrCHj = E CO. RD. NO. 35 0 ] W M ,M 6 O M w Ir n R 0 AFTO I 'RD. u d G AVE ME IN 7LONGF1L OW CA* .1 I Greer Sc>L < I< '°A 4 Z I K = DE t AI i td * 'Eirr EEL DR. .Jowir. M ` EBROO AVE. - OSHAMROCK .«. . f ` is`' H DR. ; ARA K DR. PLAZA E "R` T PROPOSED COMMERCIAL t W fl4 PLAN AMENDMENT 'o WAR F N R TWOOD ° o * moo• -- -- - — - ' - 1000 ICADA OD ON R ? woo ILID rn O 39 ; CEDAR o WL•A. LONDIN LA. w OD c TODNILL BASSWOOD 111D. m see 494 twacr'r . I i " WOOD "ILL o o J Seh a CT ; W j MA ILA D MAILANDRD. 48O --- - - -- —o i - - - - -- - - - - - -- -- —0 on D 2 0 ° LOR A7 N RD. U RYY o o p 1 w o dr r. - 1 u aYC f4G FOX T. f:A NILLMr00D t I FfM - O VALLEY CREEK MALL °R X _ G a 0 O o . 1 _ 1a O _ 0 0 R z +LSST ° 2 CO. RD. NO. 123 4 tlINDGA7E RD. J CAUT. O N R W EA I LINWOOD 120 AVE. - - c 0-4w 4L STEEPLE 0 v%E - W - 2004 Lij Rte. SCN.) 1 ',,, 0 wb .00 Q V ? = AEMAR J I Ir Z ; I I v RERDEE wW Id y YALL ylEi L. I ICTORI O t HIGHW OD AVE, i COURTLY RD. •> Q 1 AgIE WI I 1 NEMITZ z I 0 =0 INC AVE. < W z i VE. u _ I • . z •Ot OUTMCR fS LYNNZ t Cr AVE. I C LA. T. N SHOE ' Carver 0 I I BOXWO Itoxwoo — AV i AVE. 1 i I 3000 j I MARI - I ap CARY 4 I is v • 49 GREEN ND AVE23I~ - - •-24 ______ _______lc_____ _ _____ ___2o-_______ INC 1 TV } LA s ' 14car, s1 SC MK _ LOCATION MAP Existing Commercial' Centers 5 - .Attachment One t a 1 PROPOSED SC 28 338 i PROPOSE rDRh PROPOSED RL NJ UJ - 346 z i AN 5 2299 LO N D 1 130 C) C:J +tc • 1 i ! M A P LEE 00D 1 ' PROPERTY LINE MAP 6 - Attachment Two s r 1 L L S'Q L O to E PROPOSED SC .. PROPOSED Rh - WOW j PROPOSED R1 •• Rm ~, d 111 irtrft ti D minor collec or V , R h R R1 cc 1 ON i - 1t11 • minor collector Sir a M ! `j p S P - ,a cn cc I . L -- 0S 1 Ri minflr co edorai n-C4f 1 y.rl i O V i mayor co ec or UCM Z Q W L Li I I I c LM LM 1 L O cc L E o 0 i a r Z W V Vista Hollis NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN Attachment Three TT OP 4 a t111i 111111 ti 1111 111 Ii • 2, we iR • GEORGE LATIMER MAYOR Septembe r 28, 1982 Mfr. Geoff Olson City. of Maplewood 1902 E, County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Olson DIVISION OF PLANNING 25 West Fourth Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55102 612- 298 -4151 With respect to the •-p rop osed plan change allowing service commercial development, the southeast corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road we have the following concerns: ' 1. There should be some clear determination of need for commercial space before a p l a n change is made. Our ex-- peri ence does not indicate a great deal of demand. A high rate of turnover in commercial uses has been observed at Shamrock Plaza located i n St. Paul at that intersection. This is likely because of the extensive shopping available one mile north in the Sun Ray - Suburban Avenue retail cen- ter, as well as the shopping and services. available At UAlleyCreekMallone , and one -half miles east. Neither present de- velopment densities nor future development proposals that we are aware of for Highwood and this portion of Maplewood in- dicate need for the additional commercial space* 2. Because of the nature of the 'terrain and the natural P andthatexistsat-this site, there should be some assurance that adequate provision for storm water rententi on can be made before the p l a n is amended. The area would appe ar ' to require extensive grading and filling to allow for tradi - ti on al commercial Bevel opment. The City of St. Paul has no storm sewer facilities in this immediate area other than a minor ditch section along Lower Afton Road. It is ve probable that development, especially commercial, east of McKnight Road will create erosion and flooding problems inP this ditch section. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposal, Sincerely, Peggy A. Reichert Deputy Director for Planning PAR: KF:sb Attachment Four CITY OF SAINT PAUL DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 8 _ City of Maplewood 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 August 23, 1983 Attention: Mr. Geoff Olson AICP - Director of Community Development Gentlemen: Subject: Plan Amendment - Lower Afton, McKnight and Londin Lane Recently I received a letter from the village regarding the council's desire to reclassify my property from RM to RH and SC. This letter was very well received and demonstrated the council's desire to come up-front in 'a non- adversary relationship with. a plan that is most logical for the usage of the land and one which w i l l provide the greatest return for the village with no adverse affects to its citizens. With such a zoning plan, it will be far easier to contact large reputable builders, who can then have a greater degree of assurance that their time and effort . spent in a logical overal 1 "PUD" plan w i l l be accepted. Without such a zoning plan, an adversary situation is set -up. Good builders will go where they are welcomed, leaving only marginal builders and piecemeal development, or; a builder may decide that he is willing to fight, and if he has the stamina and a lower land price, he can obtain the RH and SC land cl assi f i.cati ons . This situation w i l l be a contest all along the way, with the only winner being the developer and both the village and the landowner being the losers. Real estate development_ is based in a major way,* on timing and needs, and good development cannot rely on too much guessing or unknowns. If a need develops, a builder cannot begin to satisfy the need if *he does not have some assurance of an acceptable location. 3M, as an example, leases extensive office space and personnel training space in Woodbury. 3M also rents or leases a large number of housing units . for both domestic and foreign personnel and their f a m i l i e s visiting its Maplewood facilities. If their was some assurance up front that such needs could be satisfied in Maplewood, it may be possible to.put some- thing together. The 3M case seems unlikely at present, but if some ammeni ti es, such as.-shopping, -recreation, medical facilities, or a good restaurant, etc., was available, it is possible that this, al ong with the ready access to 3M, could be attractive. The point is, that good development needs to be attracted. h Attachment Five 9- City of Maplewood Page 2 August 23, 1983 The easiest and most natural decision to make, is to do nothing; for example, I was particularly distressed at the expressions made at the Maplewood Planning Commission meeting August 15. "Leave• =_the - zoning as it is, in this way we will have the upper hand and when a builder comes i n, we wi`i 1 have a lot of leeway and, can then decide what to agree upon. This adversary reasoning almost assures that we will *not attract builders who can put together and implement a good "PUD" plan. With the controls that we now have . in the, village, there is no reason for having fear in asking for a logical, reasonable development and in trying to attract one. The arguments presented at the Planning Commission meeting of August 15 for not taking an agressive position and trying to attract logical development were, for the most part, based on the fear of change. The 7 -11 store complex was brought up as satisfying for shopping needs of the area. In reality, we know that very few f a m i l i e s can afford the luxury or limited merchandise of convenience store shopping for family needs. The 7 -11 store complex was also brought up as being very acceptable in the neighborhood by the four or so residents along McKnight Road. If this is so, the corner directly opposite, which would hardly be any closer to these homes 80 should also be equally as desirable, possibly more so, since it would not be a teenager meeting place. In 1971, the property was approved for 375 apartment units which was a far greater density than is now permitted for an RH classification. There were comments that shopping needs are already provided by Sun Ray and Woodbury; these are not necessarily applicable.We have many residents in South Maplewood who would go out of their way to reach these facilities.This can be especially true with the upgrading of Lower Afton Road to a major four .lane arterial, connecting Maplewood and Woodbury with downtown St. Paula With the excellent road system in this area, the concerns about traffic problems certainly would be a very minor concern. 4 would be happy to work with the village and would appreciate any input on the type of development that is needed. Sincerely, A. E. Johnson 2299 Londin Lane St, Paul, MN 55119 saf .10- Plan Amendment Resolution RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council and staff initiated an amendment to. the Maplewood comprehensive plan from.RM, residential medium density to SC, service commercial; RH, residential high density and RL, residential Tow density for the following-described property: r East of McKnight Road, between Lower Afton Road and Londin Lane These properties are more commonly described as 328 -358 McKnight Road and 2271 -2299 Londin Lane; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. This plan amendment was initiated by the Maplewood City Council and staff. 2. The Maplewood planning commission held a public hearing on September 19, 1983, to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said plan amendment be 3. The Maplewood city council considered said plan amendment on , 1983. The council considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The SC designation will encourage the development of commercial services that are convenient to the residents of south Maplewood. 2. The RH designation w i l l compensate for the loss of density from the SC amendment, thereby avoiding a loss of future housing. 3. The tax base would be increased. 4. The RL designation recognizes the existing single dwellings. The above amendment is done with the understanding that a change back to residential would not be objectionable if the property owner requests it.. Adopted this day of 1983. Seconded by Ayes -- 11- D. Plan Amendment: Lower Afton, McKnight and Londin Lane Secretary Olson read the notice of public hearing. The proposal is to change the plan from RM to SC, RH and RL. Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone resent who -wisheddyPe to comment on the proposal. _ Jerry Johnson, 2445 Lond i n Lane, representingn Connemara 'P g II Assocation, questioned if the plan was to be changed to RH adjacent to Connemara II,Said there is a big pond, with a lot of wildlife and pine .trees. Some ofPthe - w i l d l i f e would be destroyed, traffic has to be considered on Londi n Lane. and McKnight. Right across from the proposed SC is the 7 -11 Store and Shamrock Center. He does not think the proposed SC is needed because the area is already quite well served. Mark LeCI a i re, 346 S. McKnight, said when they purchased their home it was understood the adjacent property woul remain lowow dens i ty . He reviewed the service areas already within a short distance of the area. He thought the valuation of his property would decrease if townhouses would develop. He contacted the DNR and Watershed. They are interested in following up on what would happen to the pond. He has a problemwithlitteringandfoottrafficbehindhishousenow. Dick Martenson, 2455 Londin Lane, questioned if this proposed designation was b g be applieded to the property because an RH designation was removed from property in another part of the City. Secretary Olson said it would be com ati bl a the surrounds n ro ertpgPPy is presently developed what the higher density, with the exception of the single fami at the corner. Mr. Martenson questioned if the Community would lose federal funding df the goals outlined in the comprehensive plan are not met. Secretary Olson said the goals are part of the Metropolitan Council goals which allocates a certain number of units to each community. There is nothing that says the City has to have the units, however, it does help in terms of getting grants if the City can show .we are making progress towards the housing goals. Mr. Martenson said the pond and w i l d l i f e in the area would be eliminated if the property would be developed to the higher density. He also said he had concerns with traffic and safety for existing and future residents going into the central city to their jobs. Gary Catch, 328 McKnight Road, questioned if federal funds would be fiost if the service commercial area would not be designated. Secretary Olson said no. The City Council felt there was a need for a commercial area in the general area. _ Mr. Catch said the City has not commented on the recommendation of the Ci of St. Paul regarding the storm sewer and the need for development. The time to rezone is when there is a developer i nterest,at that time the surrounding property owners could negotiate-with the develop Once the property is rezoned, it will be difficult to sell their single - family S 8 -15 -83 home with . apartments right next to them. This would be a good addition to the park Just north of it, Mr. LeCI ai re said there is* concern with traffic safety in the area, There has been accidents already. He would also l i k e to see the w i l d l i f e preserved. Barb Katzmark, 338 S. McKnight, she i s concerned not only9ywith the additional traffic on McKnight Road but also with the pedestrian traffic. No additional commercial land is required, there is already a 7 -11 store. here will be a lot of multiple b u i l d i n g s adjacent to the four-single homes. Owner of a single dwel 1 i ng suggested if the City wished to change to multiple, they purchase the single dwelling homes and then it could develop any way the City would wish. Arnie Johnson, 2299 Londin Lane, said when they had the propertyrezonedforapartmentsini972thecomprehensivePlanshowedthe property as RH. He' said Connemara is to repair the pond that was somewhat filled during the construction of the apartment b u i l d i n g s . They* still have not done that. Chairman Axdahl closed the public hearing portion of the * meeti ng. It was indicated by a Commissioner that he was not in favor of the proposed change to SC and RH because of the existing facilities within Shamrock not all being occupied and also because of the comments received from the landowners. They were not in favor of the commercial designation. Also a waiver of the moratorium to apply a R -3 zonin district to the site.would be required. It was also commented by another commissioner he could not see designating the property for Service Commercial as long as a definite development plan is not present. The service facilities are already provided in the neighborhood. He also commented on the traffic conditions as they exist, additional development would further add to traffic congestion. Commi ss i oner Whitcomb moved the P1 ann i ng Comm City Council that the land use plan not be change RM to SC and RM to RH however the Planning Commissio recommends a_plan amendment from RM to RL for the property Bevel o,pe to si of e family at the northeast corner of Londin Lane and McKni t Road, Denial of the RM to RH and SC is based on the followin T. Not a good commercial decision. Z. The decision to to to SC is. not a landowners decision 3. Would require a waiver of the R -3 zone change moratorium to change and develop as RH 4. The zone change would have to occur within 9 months B. No specific development is currently proposed. Commissioner Pel 1 i sh seconded Ayes--Commiss.ioners Axdahl , Barrett, F11 efson, Fischer, Hejny, Pel 1 i sh, Prew, Si gmund i k, S1 etten Whitcomb Abstained--Commissioner Robens 6 .8 -15 -83 Ct ?f Off, c 0 4 V'1 t11II111[11 ti ltl III it a o GEORGE LATIMER MAYOR September 30* , 1983 CITY OF SAINT PAUL DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF PLANNING 7i Geoff -Olson, Director Department of Community Development City of Maplewood 1902 E. County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Geoff: 25 West Fourth Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55102 612 -298 -4151 From: Dir. -of Com..-Rave? op. ti Referred to: Villag t Village Cierk Finance Dirct Dir. of Par" : r 1)4..r. of Pub. Safety ______ Dir . of Pub. l' orke &00 - kMA. s.1 a 1 C 1 4.1' u.. L•e We received notice of a public hearing to be conducted by the Maplewood Council regarding a proposed plan amendment and zone change on the southeast corner of Lower Afton Road and McKnight Road. . Si this site. is immediately adjacent to St. Paul , the Planning Division staff was asked to review the proposed changes and comment on them. We support the plan amendment and zone change that would allow construction of a neighborhood commercial shopping center and high density residential development on the site. I believe this position was stated by a member of my staff at the Maplewood Council 's publi hearing last Monday, September 26. We feel that high density residential development on this site would be particularly appropriate, al tho ugh we have some doubts as to whether there is currently sufficient demand to support another commercial center in the area. As I understand it, the Council tabled the issue until October 10, when the public hearing will be resumed and a decision made. Regardless of whether the Council approves the plan amendment and zone change, we have a couple of general concerns regarding large -scale development on this site 1) increased stormwater runoff into St. Paul ; and 2) increased traffic flow at the inter- section o f Lower Afton and McKnight. We realize that no specific development is proposed for the site at this time. When a specific development proposal is in the works, we would like to work with Maplewood city staff to address these two potential problem areas and develop mutually agreeable solutions, Increased stormwater runoff from this area is of concern to us because the existing drainage system on Lower Afton -Road in St. Paul is not adequate to handle substantial increases in runoff. As you know, city staff members from Maplewood and St. Paul are currently working with the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District on a revision of the watershed district plan., I hope that through this mechanism we can continue to work together on stormwater management issues to insure that the management system for the area is ade- quate to respond to new development. nrT n A 10g3 e Geoff Olson, Director Department of Community Development Page Two _ Increased traffic flow at McKnight and_ Lower Afton is also a concern because i t'may require .that the intersection be redesigned. According to our traffic engineers, this intersection could handle approximately a 50 percent increase in traffic flow over present levels. Tra ffi c generated -by a large-scale development that includes a neighborhood shopping center would probably exceed the current capacity of the intersection. I f traffic flow becomes a problem, I would hope we could work together to develop a satisfactory solution, This 'i's just one example of issues that both Maplewood and St. Paul face as we work toward developing and redeveloping our cities. I am confident that we can work ;together on these and similar issues i.n a cooperative fashion. Sincerely, Peggy R i hert Deputy D rector for Planning cc: Toni Baker, Community Organizer, District 1 Council MEMORANDUM Action by Council: TO: City 9Mana e r Endors e H_,.__. .._._... FROM: Director of Community Development Modifie SUBJECT: Rezoning ReJ ecte .._.__ LOCATION: - S.E. Corner of Lower Afton Road and McKni t Rbaic APPLICANT: City of Maplewood = OWNERS: Arnold Johnson (2299) and Marie Johnson (2271) DATE: August 9, 1983 SUMMARY Request Rezoning from F, farm residence to SC, shopping center, R -3, multiple dwellingandR -1, residence di ct (single dwelling). Reason for the Request No specific development is proposed. State law requires that.the property be rezoned within nine months after a plan amendment, if the amendment conflicts with the plan. Comments This report assumes that council amends the plan to (SC) p serv commercial and RH) residential high density. Council must now choose the ro er zone. The only P y choice for the RH land i s R -3 multiple. There are several choices for the SC land: 1. SC, shopping center zone 2. BC, business commercial 3. BC(M), business commercial modified Refer to the attached list of uses for each zone (pages 5 to 7 ). The SC, shopping center zone is recommended because it seems closest to what council is looking for - -a shopping center rather than individual commercial b u i l d i n g s . It also would not allow such uses as car sales, drive-in restaurants or car washes. Council has a moratorium on rezonings to R -3. The ur ose is to allow council toPP study areas designated on the land use plan for multiples to determine if there is a conflict with adjacent single dwellings. Since council has studied the land use plan for this site, there is no reason to delay rezoning. Recommendation (at least four votes required) I,_ Waiver of the moratorium on R - 3 rezon i n s for this site.9 II. Approval of the enclosed resolution, rezoning the Johnson property from F farm residential to SC, shopping center and R -3, multiple as shown on page 4 . BACKGROUND Site. Description Acreages: 1/3 acre proposed for R-1-zoning 6; acres proposed for SC zoning 18- acres proposed for R -3 zonin _ 25 1/3 acres total Eci sti ng land use: undeveloped, except for a single dwelling on= Londi n Lane Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Lower Afton Road and Battle Creek Park Easterly: Connemara condominiums Southerly: Londin Lane and high - density townhouse projects Westerly: McKnight Road, Shamrock Plaza apartments, and five single dwellings at McKnight Road Past Action 7 -1 -71: Council. approved a PUD for 375 apartment and townhouse units. T h i s PUD expired in .1972. Planning Zoning: F, farm residence Procedure 1. Planning commission recommendation to city council. 2. City co l holds a public hearing and makes a deci mh 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Pap 30 SC District 4. BC District 5. BC(M) Distri 6. Resolution 2 I SUN RAY SHOPPING CENTER . ! st AV out 0 A fr Rp N t7 h ST. ' 1 > s I .2kD S7 k. s' K r` . UDSC) 94 HASTINGS ; .... rt «.. -•w ° ; I W L9 1 ST ST NtMfLX.SC UBURB N FL E+uoc ., ' KE z ":. N. 94 _CIN R1 V[1VC !75:DE 1 It M PL BROOKV W = CI 1Z w Ilk LA ' ( SCSI. RIO` tto. D 2 D t r r•tip R S `4 ¢ MAYER LA. 4; O = Battle Creek LA PP JAMES t • - CO. RD. NO. 35 .+. . _ IX tr: LOM6rE Sa 'a CL f - •, EELIMrssSlOw3r" 0 D I, 1 1 i,.+40 DR. E6ROOK •YE. - >° a C SHAMROCK Va ar . t`' H DR. 3 TAMARA K DR. PLAZA EM. eE- PROPOSED COMMERCIAL! MIL tNVE. PLAN AMENDMENT \ &7 — N R - tw D o * 1000 LA . # cEDi e OD C DODWILL BASSW ED. WLONDINLA. O m lap at tit. A . 1 ' " WOOD „ILL o W J T i W • w m v. MAILAN 2-- - - = - -- — - - - - -- - - - - -- — -- - r MAILAND RD. 4$0 0 c LOWER AFT x RD. DID URYE .,. o 1l MILE MOOD P w t GoE O T.WIN w e< VALLEY CREEK MALL V -' ID IL WOOD , o ? AR 5 „ °s , EA CO_ RD. NO. 123 _ —_ •C WIPIDCATE RD. rAUL Fr. gyp• _ `R _ N . = ` ST • LINWOOD 120 1 AVE, p F STEEPLE b W LtiM!s = ti •0 f {a I SEN.I cc All- Z O J ! ~ r I • Af WAR J Er p v 1 RERDEE I w VIERS L. 1 I LEMRO C I 3 z ; I i ICTORI #'o O i HIGHWOOD AVE - - -- -- __ COURTLY -- -- - - - - -- — — -- O. RD. NO. 74 s — 17 — ci t i 011MITZ AV . W = 1 VE• L! _ 1 Z ilk ' v 160YTM[R S 1 LYNIi= AVE. LA. i N HOE ' Carver ' sozwo -1100 >K AV AVE., ! I 3000 1 MARI i 1 CO R NO 4 1 1 :0 CARY fAVE. I t = 1 1 GREEN D AV 1 1 23 -- , __ ..24 _______lam_____ _ _____ ___2o-_______1440 . 1 LA i 1 SCHLOtK ; — • — ••- LOCATION MAP Existing Commercial Centers Attachment One 3- RESER FOR 0 1 2 G V r1 In V 1 r a r PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP PROPOSED ZONING IKAM Attachment Two 4 N DIVISION 8. SC SHOPPING CENTER DISTRICT Sec. 36 -173. Use regulations. In an SC Shopping Center District in the cit3, a building or combination of buildings may be erected or used, and the lot area , may be used or occupied for any of the following purposes, and no other, but in no case shall a building be used for living quarters: 1) Retail store, including retail outlet showroom for uses per- = mitted in subparagraph (9) hereof, but not including auto- mobile sales agency; provided that, no goods shall be dis- played on the exterior of the premises. t 2) Restaurant, tea room or cafeteria. 3) office agency or studio. { 4) The following personal service shops dealing directly with customers; beauty parlor, barber shop, clothes cleaning agen- cy, automatic self - service laundry, dressmaking, millinery or similar shop;~ provided that all- repair or processing work is conducted in accordance with subparagraph (9) below. 5) Theater, not including outdoor motion picture establishment, assembly hall, or community building, indoor recreational establishment or library, child day center. _ 6) Bakery, confectionery or custom shop for the production of ` articles to be sold at retail on the premises; provided that, all baking or processing is conducted in accordance with sub - paragraph (9) below. 7) Bank. . 8) Passenger station. 9) The following uses; provided that, if such uses are located on the ground floor, they shall not be located within twenty -five 25) feet of the front of the building; and further provided that, they shall be effectively screened from the front portion of the building by a wall or partition: a. General servicing or repair. b. Upholstering. c. Carpentry or woodworking. d. Electrical, radio, television repair. e. Hand laundering, dry cleaning or pressing, providin g no inflammable fluids are used. f. Tailoring, dressmaking or repair. g. Millinery repair or processing. i • h. Baking, confectionery making or similar processing. 1 L Frozen food lockers. j. Any similar use involving repair, processing or storage activity. t t (10) Accessory use customarily incidental to any of the above uses. 11) Any use of the same general character as any of the above ' permitted uses, when authorized as a special exception by the city council; provided that, such use shall be permitted subject to such reasonable restrictions as the city council may determine; and further provided that, no trade or busi- ness, shall be. permitted which is either noxious or hazardous. 5 - Attachment Three` DIVISION 7. BC BUSINESS AND' COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Sec.. 36 - 153. Use regulations. In a BC Business and Commercial District in the city, the follow- ing regulations shall apply: 1) Permitted uses: A building maybe erected or used= and a lot may be used or occupied, fo1 any of the following-purposes, and no other: a) Apartment for one - family in combination with business use. - b) Hotel, motel, tourist borne, rooming house or boardin - - house. c) Retail sl.ore, restaurant, office, agency, .studio, bank, . personal service and craftsmen's shop, mortuary. ' d) Automobile sales agency used car lot, parking garage or lot, provided all facilities are located and all services are conducted on the lot . e) Newspaper publishing, job printia' Theater.W establishment. ' g) Hand or automatic self- serv laundry. h) Bakery or confectionery shop, for the production of ar- ticles to be sold only at retail on the premises. W Public garage or motor fuel station; provided that a license to operate such business is first obtained from the city council pursuant to chapter 17 of this Code- All public garages and motor fuel 'stations must be so lo- cated on the site and the site shall be of the size as provided in section 36 -156 of this division which defines kinds of operation, site area required and other data relating to such business. - j) Any use of the same general c}aracter as any of the above permitted uses; provided that, no use which is noxious or hazardous shall be permitted. . 2) Special. exceptions: The following uses are allowed when authorized by the city council as a special exception: a) All uses permitted in R -3 Residence Districts, excepP the construction of dwelling houses permitted in divi- Sions 3 and 4 of this article, R -1 and R -2 Residence Districts. b) Processing and distributing station for milk or other beverages, carting or hauling station. . c) Place of amusement, recreation or assembly, other than a theater, when conducting indoors. d) Yard for storage, sale and distribution of ice, coal, fuel oil or building materials, when enclosed withiD a fence of not less than six (6) feet in hei ht but not- ncluding g junkyard, salvage, automobile or other wrecking yard. Code 1965, § 907.010; Ord. No. 232, § 3, 10- 19 -67; Ord. No. 256,11- 20 -69,• Ord. No. 402, § 1 8- 12 -76) Attachment Four Sec.36 -155. BC(M) Commercial District (Modified 1.INTENT. The SC K Busin _ District , si ess Corznercial Hodified District is intended to provide for the orderly transition between more Intensive corznercial uses and low or medium density residential areas. Restrictions on but not limite parkingdto, building height, setbacks, orientation, arkin lot locati or Jpcation of building entrances may be required to ensure compatibilitPYwitiiabuttingresidentialuses. 2.USE REGULATIONS. 'A building may be-erected or used, and a lot may be used or occupied, for any of the' following purposes, and no other: R a_ Retail store; professional administrative offices; bank of savinggandloan; _ personal service, craftsmen's shop, mortuar b. Hotel or motel c. 'Walk -in theatre • d. Job printing shop - U e. Bakery or candy shop producing goods for on- premises retail sales. f. .Any use of the same general character as an of the above permittedYeP uses, as determined by the City Council, P rovided that no use which is noxious or hazardous shall be permitted. . 3.The following uses when authorized by the City Council. by means of a specie use permit: ' Be All uses permitted in R - 3 Multiple Dwelling Districts excep the conPg P struction of houses permitted In R -1 and R -2 districts. b. Laundromat or similar automatic self - service laundr c. Restaurant, where there are no drive -up order windows or serving of food to patrons in their. automobiles. Ali cooking odors must be contrc so as not to be noticeable to adjacent residences. • d. Place of amusement, recreation, or assembly, than s theater,y' ' wherre there are no outdoor activities. - - Attachment fi ve Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a . regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council Chambers in said City on the day of 1983 at 7:00 p.m., The following members were present. The following :members were absent: _ WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F farm residence to SC, shopping center and R -3, multiple for the following- described property: Unpl atted lands, subject to old .Lower Afton Road and McKnight Road and except south 450 feet of west 250 feet part of northwest 1/4 of northwest 1/4 south of New Lower Afton Road -in 12- 28 -22. The SC zone shall consist of the north 380 feet of the west 900 feet of the above property. The R -3 zone consists of the balance of the property. In addition, the following-described parcel shall_ be rezoned from F to R -1: Unpl atted -lands, East 124 1/10 feet of the west 250 feet of the south 150 feet of the northwest 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 (subject to Londi n Lane) in 12- 28 -221, These properties are also known as 2299 and 2271 Londin Lane, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows 1. This rezoning was initiated by the .City of - Maplewood, pursuant to chapter 36, article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on August 15, 1983. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be . 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 1983, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The y Council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL -.that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the fol l owing findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantia 'injure or detract from the! use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the and c &veni.ences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 40 The proposed change would have a negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, police and fire protection and schools. Adopted this day of 1983. Seconded by Ayes— STATE OF MINNESOTA j COUNTY OF RAMSEY" } Ss. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I,the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the City of .Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have careful compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of 1983, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript there- from insofar as the same relates to this rezoning. Witness my hand as such : C1 erk and the corporate seal of the City this day of 1983. City Cl erk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 9 8. NEW BUSINESS C. Rezoni ngs : Lower Afton McKnight and Londi n Lane Secretary Olson said based on the previous action by the Commission, he would suggest no action be taken on this matter. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend that the Ci t - Y Council den the Proposed resolution on the basis that it is contrar to the Comprehensive Plan exce pt the prqperty at 2271 Londin Lane be rezone to R -1. Commissioner Prew seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, El 1 efson, Fischer, Hejny, Pel l i sh, Prew, Robens, Si gmundi k, Sl etten, Whitcomb 4-,-J i MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Associate Planner--Johnson SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit and Plan Review Appeal _ LOCATION: Van Dyke Street and County Road B - APPLICANT: Sauro Realty - OWNER: Edven Evenson, Annie Evenson, Stanley Zimmerman - 4 DATE: September 29, 1983 SUMMARY Action by Council: Endorsed,„ Modified .. Reiecte Date- Request Approval of a conditional use permit to construct multiple - dwelling units in a BC, business commercial zoni ng district and appeal of the Community Design Review Board's denial of the site plan. Proposal 1. Fifty -six rental units (eight quads and three eight -unit structures) would be constructed. 2. See page 10. proposed site play. 3. Each structure would be apartment style (stacking of units) and each unit would contain two bedrooms. 4. A small tot lot area would be set aside on the site (page 10). S. See the applicant's letter on page .11 for .information. o% & -., A M 4. 0% This request is consistent with the planned use and density for this site. Council, however, tabled consideration of the request on September 12 until the Design Review Board had considered the proposal's compatibility with adjacent development. iOn September 27, the Design Review Board agreed that the site, building elevation and landscaping (including_ the new screening requirements) plans would be acceptable, subject to the requirements suggested by staff, The Board, however, felt it was obligated to deny approval of the site plan due to . the language of item 4b of the Planning Commission minutes. The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval of the conditional use permit* included the routine conditional use permit requirement that "the use would preserve and i ncorpor-ate the site's natural and scenic' f= features." The Board, however, interpreted this requirement to mean that all of'the mature trees on this site should be saved. Since they would not be,.Ithe site plan was denied. Staff does not feel. these trees (poplar and aspen) are significant enough to be saved. The.landscaping to be provided by the applicant would be significantly more attractive and provide more screening than the trees that would be removed during construction. yStaffonly concern with the building design is that the proposed textured permitted. This i s a high main-should not becedarplywood (T - - 11) siding P tenance P roduct and, as such, is undesirable for use on rental structures.. The building elevation plans should be redesigned to eliminate the use of extensive use of low maintenance materials such as T- 1- 11.-siding and to show _ brick, stuccos aluminum or-hardboard siding. Recommendation d resolution (page ;a conditional'.A royal of the enclose 16) approvingAp ermi t to construct multiple dwellings in the business commercial zoning district at County Road B and Van Dyke p Street, subject to: 1. Constructionon be g i i nni n 9 within one year. Code allows a one -time, six month extension f dust cause is shown. The applicant must apply for such extension, in writing, at least thirty days prior to expira -. tion. 2.Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any of the structures which do not front on County Road B. Council must order the extension of a water main north along Van Dyke Street from County Road B. 3. Final 9al 'grading, draina e and utility plans must be approved by the City Engineer. 4. yAn connection to utilities in County Road B or temporary curb cuts to County Road B must be approved in writing by the Ramsey County r Department of Public Works. 5. Subm of an e cont plancontrol1 prior to issuance of any build- Ong permits, which inco the recommendations of the Watershed and Soil and Water Conservation Districts. t wide sanitary6. Grants ng of twenty -foot y sewer easements, centered on xistin lines located in the vacated Sandhurst Avenue and Laurie the existing Road. 9- 20 -83), building elevation (stamp-II. Approval of the site plan ( • . and landscapi 9- 13 -83) plans, subject to the dated 9 20 83) P 9 following conditions: ai 1 ed buildingdin elevation plans for the dwellings and 1.Resubmi of det g . for staff approval. Exclusive use of low maintenance siding garages PP _ materials shall be. i l ustrated. plan to building permit issuance to 2:. Su bmi ss i on of a rev i sed site p p relocate the structures presently located within the required sewer easements and to reduce possible headlight glare on the homes across the street. be stored i n maso enclosures -wiwith a 100° 3. Trash dumpsters shall y opaque woo den g ate ( solid wood boards, not the proposed T - 1 - 11 ply wood siding ma terial - and shall be a color and material compatible with the building* 9Locationanddesign shall be subject to staff approval. N 4. An exterior building equipment shall be decoratively screened andAny hidden from view. The screening material is subject to staff approval P5.An erosion control plan for construction shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. ' 6. Parking areas shall be stri P ed and all bituminous areas shall have continuous concrete curbing. _ i lighting shall be7. Site security g g provided and shall be directed orP shielded so not to cause any undue glare onto adjacent properties or roadways. 8. If an y adjacent property is disturbed or property irons removed due to construction of the site, that property shall be restored and irons replaced by the applicant. 9. Other than the. driveway to County Road B, all driveways shall be at least 24 fee wide. Turning radii at the Van Dyke Street curb cuts s hall be provided subject to approval by the city engineer. fence shall be kept* i n good repair and stained or painted10. The screening e P 9 a color compatible with the dwdlling units. p11.The floor plans for the eight -pl ex buildings shall be revised to show at least 740 square feet, of habitable space for each two - bedroom unit. Storage areas number two and seven shall be revised to contain at least 120 cubic feet. The revised plans shall be submitted for staff approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 12. If construction has not begun within one year of approval, this designug review shall be void, requiring resubmission to proceed. 3 BACKGROUND Site Description Size: 6.9 acres _ Existing land use: undeveloped Surrounding Land Uses - T North. Schwan Bicycle and two small undeveloped parcels zoned for R -3, multiple dwelling and BC, business commercialal use East. YVanDyke Street. Across the street, single - dwelling homes South: County Road B. Across the street, Kinney's Shoes and three y single dwellings West Commercial _l and uses fronting on White Bear Avenue and a nonconform- 9 9insin le dwelling, also fronting on White Bear Avenue Past Actions 8 -2 -79: 1) Council denied a plan amendment request from SC, service commercial ial high density for the portion of this site located between to RH, resident 9 Y e fndn s that vacated Laurie and Sandhurst Avenues (page 9 }, based on th g n no h ical changes to warrant a change in the land use there have been spY. anon• and 2 CouncilPlanning )aescription as stated i n the Commission recommendg request from BC, business commercial to R -3, multipledeniedazonechangerqrequest, ased upon dwelling for the same as the denied plan amendment P dwel g - nonconformance with the Comprehensive Plan. Comprehensiv Plan Update which amended the 6- 28 -82: Council. adopted the Co p designation SC service commercial to RM, residential medium on of this s density. tabled consideration of this request until i t has been 9 -12 -83 . Council1 tabl mmunit Design Review Board** Access to County Road 'B, reviewed by the Community 9 excessive 'ssive density and compatibility with adjoining residen uses were concerns voiced by Council and neighboring property owners. Plannin 1. Land Use Plan designation: RM, residential medium density 20 Zoning. BC, business commercial and R -3, multiple dwelling (page 9). 3. Permitted density: 22 people /net acre y Proposed density: 20.3 people /net acre4. P y _ 5 pCompliance with land use laws:- d permits R -3, multiple dwellings a. Section 36 153 of City Code llings in.BC, p businessness commercial districts by condi ti oral use .permit. 4 of City Code requires ten findings for approval of a b. Section 36-442 ,y 1 for .theconditusepRefertotheresolutiononpage • 6condtPnthfinding 'the nine findings that apply to this request. The to 9 preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic use would pres P . features into the development design, does not apply to t his site There are no s tee p slopes, o es , wetl ands or tree stands of significance. Housing: consistent with the Housing Plan .goal of promoting a. The proposal . s ' es ( ceilingiesformoderateincomefame1 620 new housing opp ortun t 525 /month rental $ 62,250 . to purchase)._ between 1980. and 1990. To a approximately 118 new units must be constructed meet this goal pp during the remainder of the decade. This proposal would account for 18 units. Other than Pearson's mobile home park, no 56 of the 1 si 1980 her significant new construction has been proposed •of g moderate income housingwhichwouldassistinachievingthelowto goal. . These units would rent for an average of $415 /month, which includes a garage. The most expensive unit would rent for $440 /month. The renter would be responsible for the major utility costs. Each unit would have an individual furnace and air conditioning. b. There are no other multiple - dwelling complexes in the immediate area. Coon Ra ids has conducted an ongoing study since 19 c. The City of C P ate the value which documents that multiple dwellings do not depreciate dwellings. The study also documents . of nearby single that when these 9 homes are listed for sale, they sell just as quickly as homes in other area of the city. Public Works ` Street. Construction of the proposed 1. Water s not available in Van Dyke a e 10' willl re u i re the extension of water from County four - pl ex units (p g } q _ Dyke Street. The proposed eight -pex units Road B, north along Van Dy l its could hook up to sewer and water in County Road B, if approved by the Count Van Dyke Street is located on the periphery of a g 9 neighborhood 2 ' y single-dwelling residential street. The traffic and should not be viewed as a typical , devel would not be excessive for this street volume generated by this P planned function as an access to SC and RM property, as well assingle- dwelling homes. - in the vacated Laurie Road and 3. There are existing sanitary sewer lines Sandhurst-Avenue rights-of-way. No easements currently exist. R amse Count he Count to receive the proposed curb cut A grading plan must be approved by t y r .9 - to County Road B. 5 Design Review Comments . Site Plan: 1. No dimensions are shown for the driveways, other than the one to County qRoad6, which is required to be 26 feet wide. All other driveways should be at-least 24 feet in width.' - 2. Proper turnin .radii must be provided at the Van Dyke Street curb cuts. 3 Sewer lines exist w the vacated Sandhurst Avenue and Laurie Road ri hts -of -wa . At least three of the four -pl ex buildings an one garage will g have to y be slightly shifted - to avoid these sewer lines. A twenty - foot wide easement area, centered on each line, should be shown on the final utilit ty plans . The. curves in the driveways to Van Dyke Street should also g ,be strai htened as much as possible to avoid headlight glare onto homes.along Van Dyke Street. Four -plex Units: 1. The gable roof and bi -level design would b e compatible with this location. 2. The exterior materials would consist of decorator block, textured cedar 1 wood siding (T-14'MPy 11) and cedar board trim. 3. The units meet minimum floor area and storage area requirements. enclosed building .4. Refer to the 9 elevation plans Eight -plex Units: 1. The applicant has not submitted detailed elevation sketches. He has indicated he will comply with City requirementso would have gabled roofs with staggered roof 1 i nes and 2. The structures g of the structures. 9buildin elevations to enhance the architectural character 690 square feet of habitable area. Code requires a ID 3. The units have about q s. Habi tabl minimum it of 740 square. feet of habitable area for two - bedroom un q area excludes closets* o and seven a .4. Storage areas number two appear to have slightly less than the required 120 cubic feet* Garages: The garages have gabled roofs.7.. would be textured plywood siding with cedar trim 2. The exterior materials P _ boards. Landscaping: 1. Refer to the enclosed pl A 2. The proposed plan meets the requirements of the screening ordinance. 8, The primarilyeexistingtreesarerimaril aspen and poplar. No significant stand of trees exists. Procedure Ci ty Counci 1 . deci si on following a public hearing. 4 Jw Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Applicant's Letter of Request 5, Building Elevations (stamp -dated 9- 20 -83) 6. Garage Elevations (stamp -dated 9- 22 -83) 7. Landscape Plan (stamp -dated 9- 13 -83) 8. Planning Commission Minutes (8-15-83) 9. Resolution 7 ru A J W a z W Q 11 T SHERREN AVE 79 N OPE FAVE. r ---- -- LARK AVEDLARKAVE. LARK AVE. J LAURIE R0. Z LAURIE RD z 25 SAND111 h!1 z AVE. 4 UNCTION U RKE LX AVE. A 8U 61K E A QQ • ti IN-: ELDRIDG AVE. S • W RELMON T Cr AVE. W ` . saAtd ) N r t `• ' s a~ VE SKILLMA N m AVE. _ NAR KIS Ros WOOD AVE. o Y aN ft I la y t RA r W W KOHLMAN AVE. LL R0. 65 - AV II to AVE. ' i AV sSTLE V. r S a EN AVE. a OPE AVE. i j 2s • APt,E R • ;) t I PUBLIC WORKS R . eLDG- Poo . a r l 0 29 0 S T u AVE h NUl 5 AVE. a SU R ' w 4 W Y VISRIE AVE. r INIPLEJY AVE.Wdkarield W fY Q 4 PH IA 4.E 3 3 =Lok e vs sap a. >` W = Z 3 c v j < i PRI 7 W t ilL P NT • AV IFIF] I ( /l I r ---- ST. PAUL v) l H r' AVE 29 PRICE % AVE W Z 65 LOCATION MAP 8 Attachment 1 t o A J W a z W Q 11 T SHERREN AVE 79 N OPE FAVE. r ---- -- LARK AVEDLARKAVE. LARK AVE. J LAURIE R0. Z LAURIE RD z 25 SAND111 h!1 z AVE. 4 UNCTION U RKE LX AVE. A 8U 61K E A QQ • ti IN-: ELDRIDG AVE. S • W RELMON T Cr AVE. W ` . saAtd ) N r t `• ' s a~ VE SKILLMA N m AVE. _ NAR KIS Ros WOOD AVE. o Y aN ft I la y t RA r W W KOHLMAN AVE. LL R0. 65 - AV II to AVE. ' i AV sSTLE V. r S a EN AVE. a OPE AVE. i j 2s • APt,E R • ;) t I PUBLIC WORKS R . eLDG- Poo . a r l 0 29 0 S T u AVE h NUl 5 AVE. a SU R ' w 4 W Y VISRIE AVE. r INIPLEJY AVE.Wdkarield W fY Q 4 PH IA 4.E 3 3 =Lok e vs sap a. >` W = Z 3 c v j < i PRI 7 W t ilL P NT • AV IFIF] I ( /l I r ---- ST. PAUL v) l H r' AVE 29 PRICE % AVE W Z 65 LOCATION MAP 8 Attachment 1 VP7 IV 4 Co - , C, I -;. i OT r 0 1,4 ZS ix, Z7in ej z of 4 1473 5 JA' of Ki nder au J4 1JLA / ' / / . '_ , ,,•• S . `' - It ; -a: A OWA- 41L— LARK 6 U-Haul X Sch win • 9%.too*%a,1W 1j) • • a-X Maple Wheel r+rir::rw.:tiirvia+ .: c- :Yir:: ' O'k A v. j - LAURI E Furniture Rental - ........ 0 . W ..... V Idle o r - tit; :. ._. !! : j Ld 21'e_3X. 44 aev. 10bj A- 44 p doom S A N D H U R S T -175' 21 ui02 r92. 2K-4.". - - X.XXX%Gas Hut , O 4 A f NZ 3 f.xvx37 ...... Pig AL ME C192Lw- o, -www. _e 49S, . .# - • A. A I J-_%6- f y. it J IN i I A At. PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP., 9 Attachment 2 J , . ter ' 1Lv L LATISLT, e* t:./T 2 ALoc , t_eTS t AMP 2, 1ll.ocr 1 - 0o NJ A6192 fLocic 4' e.,o Aodoriujm4 Ve(AtsD ALLOY! A* TRsOrf SmrrM &NO TAYL64S >AVVIT11004 70 OWN OT'.PA II6 Sva1ECT '7'd f Atrfi rlt s • "Cello. _ je•imtrY a+uaTr', atr iwwttfotA ; ,,, I , `' j 1 • R of a•PLre VNIT SLAP) 00- teO0• l 1 Y 1 , li 1i'i j =;i • • IItfT 1UtioR b 4 - Pr`=11K tJV CfLOW 6Q.aD ' r • '171 },' ; .; .. ... . cvse cur ltiVifE "'CvROAG AT cLLDLAC -Tfr pRlrs /•+s ill •' ,.& .CDWG> 6Tt SLA& A•w si sav: wALA. Ar rrzApM coo4^04110f • s INTO aa s sN.•u. Ps T>svas 1-81 c I!;; { : { r „ •ie Or w V. 44 Vt jt *COOL FA IS Vill F. L-A 40 10'r t III' I; ?;•• - 1 . 2 t .. f • 1 . r.r ,• • /ti • .. . 1 1. 11: IIIri !i I. I • i - 1 11 , ,! i •I • i '' 1 1 1 i:, }1. • + r ter- _ ' f ; I • iii •' i : I Ilt j O ' 40 ' • h }. I i!... _ ' ; I iM, I'I{ If1;'I { r til •, 4• ` I i {It 1 ••# !Ili !, I i ! i iS. r 1•' t1 • +' . - 6vti Apt d 2r. 1 TY L 1 v Cb Jr1I7e y R.A•is oYA :' 1 •. ... '' 1 - 6666 { ell l 1 it i . • • 1 iT -_ '/ Ij ;. ' •' it t!1111 '• 1 , X11 . _ . •. aw bo r II•tl t. : :II f • !' .i 1 ( •, , 1 •.,(,•" I •s .. ,I 1 l I I ` j1 ' I 't M SD` •P/N1M ire. y.,f. Ii • ', ` %' tl- I I • -_ I1 •' 'r 1 i•I`'lei '_ II I rl / tt ,/ '''' !1 , .._. - 4 lll; +, {i tllr,'' 11 ' r 1 lii` l ll i ;' I+ ti 1 I . 1 , •II • 1 ,'• / f {: I ,( •, / 1 1', t• , I t •,1 , 11 X1 I ; i ` i -, '} + { ' 1 '{ IIIII 1 •I'• i 1 1 i l ' ! i Il` 1 ;1 I ' I R I q >Ili.i ( t It .il ,, il.'.I'I `1! f ' }i •+_..- 7 II , 1 I , ill' '1 i .j 'I iii : i i I; !.i 1.' ,: {{ !'. ,' • 1 , , + III •III I ' ;: . : ; :. • + `:lii' • j ' . ,, •c. •.,.... ;' 1, ' it 11 ' Tl I •1 i l { t ,, , 1. 1 ,I i:l y ' 1 I , ( l! •• 1 1 • I 'i . II III. j f j I :I "' • i f -• 'w. }• jl f i , \\J [ 1 I: I,•} ! , 1'•,.j ' { lil t'iiISI/LL B 1; .1 t .li .,:1, g1 ..:: ' - - ii { i I ii ,I ; - - --- , t ,.• . I1: t S/ 5 ii il,'li. i 1 f..'i .II • f p,' • 7 • t .I 'i ( : i ' \ ' }''+ i': f U Q.a 115 ,.,. ; ,.. ,• I { •, I,I: ; , ; l, ' . . ,1 ' } 111 1. • 1S1 {'I ,i ill ' ' ` I ' I' ,• fir:. - i , = _ .,) ` , , ,ill I S L If \ ti// -. i is wti1"t wsL ,aTY a. wFe W^ R w•wf _ _ _I O c • S. iL +Y .. ...- • s W TtR JA IA 161 1 S • SAN ,fit. wT - N sitrr i K " ..- --- - --- •.;, it . e _ .._ , } 1;, ' .1,- --- TovTH —_-• `4• t•'et N'T tow - o v N M . lst •+M - H H N H _ —L A 5 5 o C i^ T E 5 LTC" TR GT O 'o _.QIGNAft NANOr —o2 f - T.. .4Uf.HES CO - V L OGttTY 5 u t IV LTA .-5T- PA u L- , J1A I tJ Q S 5 o T C W 1 11 1 n - - -- Attachme CSI"-A iai1 AC'S Officejice — 6 100 Englewood Office Park T o _.. ReaurA "K, C: ISa 0 In c Llll7Ci July Z , 1983 To: C ity of Maplewood z n,,.1cu1ood Avenue Q/. Paul, M 55104 Subject: Development of vacant land , North West intersectionP . of County Road B and Van Dyke, Maplewood, Minnesota. The intended use of said property is mult i- family . Three 8 unit buildin s fronting along county Road B, with under ground a - r k'ing a - our unit buildings along Van Dykes The four unit bu ildin s will ' have detached garages. All buildings will have additional garages, refering to Maplewood guidline s . We have the pleasure to meet with some of the neighbors on June 3 1983.' They asked questions and I answered them to the best of my ability , e The neighbors are naturally concerned e They would prefere to see the land remain in its present states However they . realize this in an impo6ibilitye I left the meet- g ginfeeling very comfortable and also that they are satisfied with our development. In fact, one of the neighbors expressed an interest in purchasing one of the four plexe s, as an in- vestment. These units are to be rented in the area of $00.00 to $445 per month all of the units will be completely self contained. There own furnace (gas), hot water heater, and electric. Also central air. These rent figures do include garage stalls for all units. Water will be P etetioned to go North along Van Dyke. This will 0 most likely necessary in the future in any events This water will also increase the value of the neighbors property. Mr Hu he s does not ponder or waste t If the developmentg is approved he will begin imediately. Most likely : along County Road B, as water is now in. Then continue with the. four plexe s as soon as water is provided. The option is still available to bring water into the development from B, but - this would mean burden t o the nehbors when water does go ia n to Van Dyke as gTl. staff h shown agreement to our project, as they = stated Governement agencies have shown an interest in more rental units in Maplewood 11 Attachment 4 Count R o ad B and Van Dyke , Page 2 Subject. Land development Y development will be an asset to the We sincerely feel that this p d of course add additional. revenue to M a neighborhoodorhood an plew cod Estate Taxes in place of or additional RealthroughIncreases _ vacant land* Res P a tf ly subm' ted _ J hn F • S auro 12 D. Conditional Use Permit: County Road B and VanDyke R_3 Secretary Olson said this is a request for approval of a conditional use permit to construct mul ti pl.e -dwel 1 i n'g units in a BC zoning district. Staff is recommending approval of the request. The Commission discussed with Secretary Olson the previous request for a Plan amendment and zone change. Council denied the zone change at that time. The Planning Commission also recommended denial of the request. i Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone present who wished to speak regarding this proposal, Mr. Sauro said "he is working with Mr. Hughes on this multiple development. They met with the neighbors about 6 weeks-ago, Letters were sent to all of the neighbors involved with this - situation He .said the neighbors were quite satisfied with - the proposal. Gene Hughes said they intend to follow the site plan as presented. He i ndi cated they have no problem with the conditions outlined by the staff. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission approve the fol 1 owi ng resolution and forward it to the City Council: s WHEREAS, Sauro Realty i n i t i a t e d a conditional use permit to construct multiple dwellings in a business commercial zoning district at the following- described property: Except the easterly 120 feet, the following parcels: SLUth 1/2 of vacated alley adjoining and north 1/2 of vacated Laurie Avenue adjoining and following part of Lot 2 lying east of a l i n e running from a - point in center 1 i of said avenue 272 19/100 feet east f rom west 1 i ne of lot 2 to a point on north l i n e of and 272 91/100 feet east from northwest corner of said lot 2, block 13, Smith and Taylors Addition to North St. Paul. Except south 2 65/100 feet and except following: Beginning on west l i n e of and 2 65/100 feet north, of southwest corner of lot 1, . thence east 271 49/100 feet thence north to point in center line of j vacated Laurie Road 272 19/100 feet east from west l i n e of said lots thence west to west l i n e of said lot 1, thence south to beginning, part of vacated adjacent Laurie Road in Lot 1, block 20, Smith and Taylors - Addition to North St. Paul - n south of and accruingn followingowin except 2 65/100Vacatedavenue99 feet the east 270 feet of Lot 2, block 20, Smith and Taylors Addition to North St, PQuI 13 Attachment 8 and followingowin except west 271 49/100 feet Vacated alley accruing g feet the feet of lot 1 and except west 271 49/100 the south 2 651100 - ors Addition f et of lot 2, block 20, Smith and Tayl _north 2 .65/100 e _ to North St. Paul followingowin except. north Vacated avenue south of an accruingng and 9Vd 2.65 feet the west 49 feet of east 319-feet of lot 2, . block 20 Smith yandTaylorsors Addition to North St. Paul and accruingandvacatedavenuenorthof North_ 1/2 of vacated alley and fol 1 owl ng east 495 6/10 feet of lot 1, block 29, Smi th and Taylorsors Addition to North St. Pau adjoining and east 495 6/10 fe of lot , South 1/2 of vacated alley 3 9 block 29, Smith and Ta Tors Addition to North St. Paul y NOW, THE ,BEFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION that the above-describedbed condi ti ona 1 use permit be approved on the bas i s of the following findings of fact: Cit Comprehens Plan and with the 1. -The use would conform with the y P purp and standards of the Zoning Codes of the use would not be detrimental to Z. The establishment or maintenance the publicis health, safety or general welfare. th maintained and operated to be com use would be located, designed, 3. the zoning district. compatiblea with the character of 9 P . 4.0 The use would not depreciate property values r di sturbi n to present and wouldd not be hazardous , detrimentalmental o 9 5. The use wo to noises* , gl are, smoke, dust, odor, potential surrounding 1 and uses, due i HessPn -off vibration, general unsightl fumes, water pollution * water ru electrical 'interference or other nuisances. r traffic on local streets wouldd enerate only minimal vehi cul a b. The use w 9 • unsafe access or parking needs and would not create traff c congest , that will cause undue burden to the area properties* nt' public services, such as streets, use would be served by essential pTheschools_ and parks. police, fire protection, utilities, s additionaloval re u i rements at public cost use would not create excessive a requirements o theg. The eS• and would not be detrimental t for public facilities and sery c , welfare of the City. he site's natural and scenic use would reserve and incorporate t _ g, - u P _ - m n.features into the development des Y 9 ._ adverse environmental effects:- 100 the use w;would cause minimal . 14 o Approval s subjectect to the following conditi Code allowsows a one time six month Construction beginning within one year. - such shown. . The applicanticant must apply for extension if dust cause s s P n.least thirt days prior to expo rats o extension, n writing at Y for an of the structures which to the issuance of a bu 1 d ng permit o Y 2. Prior. order the exte of a water front on. Road B, Council must _ do not ount Road B. • main north along vanDyke Street from C y cuts on vanDyke Street shall be centered on the Sandhurst and The curb he east. Avenue ri hts -of -way, located to t 4. . - - - Laurie 9 tans. s approval of the site and building p Com•nunity Design Review Board pp findin s: Approval shall include, but not be li to, the following 9 PP . m atibl a with the character of a.The use shall be des gned to be co p the zoning district. h site's natural and scenie The use would reserve and incorporate the . b. Th P features into the development design* went feet in width shall be provided along A landscape ,. d area of at 1 east twenty include the south and east boundaries of the site. This landscaping shall in of at .least six feet in height and eighty- • permanent screening be a s re u red i n Sectionon 36- opaqueness , The screeni materials shall q 27 of City Code. be Final ra di n , drainage and utilityity plans must approved by the Ci f, F 9 - g Engineer. ad B or temporaryAnconnectiontoutilitiesinCountyRoad curb cuts toP 7 • y writn b County Road B must be approved 1n 9 Y the Ramsey County Department of Public Works. plan p to issuance of any building 8 Submission of an erosion control p p perm whic incorporates the recommendations of the Watershed an Soil and Water Conservation Districts. seconded A es -- Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Commissioner Whitcomb y Ellefson, Fischer, yHe • n Pel l i sh, Prew, Robens, Si gmundi k, S1 etten,Whitcomb 15 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of ptheCityofMa 1 ewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council Chambers in said City on the day of 1983 at . 7 :00 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent. _ WHEREAS,Sauro Real t y , initiated a conditional use permit to construct multipl d w e l l i n g s in a business coinmerc i al zoning district at the following described property: Exce t the easterly 120 feet, the fol l owing parcels :P 1 alley a and north 1/2 of vacatedSouth1/ 2 - of vacated y 9 ' Laurie Avenue ad '-oi ni n and following part of Lot 2 lyi ng l east of a La g line running from a point i n center l i n e of said avenue 10027219 feet east from west line of lot 2 to a point on north line of and 272 9 feet east from northwest corner of said lot 2, block 13, Smith and Taylors Addition to North St. Paul. Except south 2 65/100 feet and except following: Beginning on west l i n e of and 2 65/100 feet north of southwest corner of l 1, east 271 49 100 feet thence north to point in center line of thence / .. vacated Laurie Road 272 19/100 feet east from west linene of said lot, thence west to west line of said lot 1, thence south to beginning, part o f vacated adjacent Laurie Road in Lot 1, block 20, Smith and Taylors Addition to North St. Paul and accru i n fol l owing except north 2 65/100Vacatedavenuesouthofa9 feet the east 270 feet of Lot 2, block 20, Smith and Taylors Addition to North St. Poul ed alleye accrn and following except west 271 49/100 feet Vacat y g the south 2 65/100 feet of lot 1 and except west 271 49/ 100 feet the Wort h 2 65/100 feet of l 2, block 20, Smith and Taylors Addition to North St. Paul Vacated avenue south of and accruing and following except north 2.65 feet ' the west 49 feet of east 319 feet of lot 2, block 20, Smith and Taylors Addition to North St. Paul North 1 /2 . of vacated alley and vacated avenue north of and accruing followingowing east 495. 6/10 feet of l 1, block 29, Smith andand Taylors Addition to North St. Paul South 1/2 of vacated alley adjoining and east 495 6/10 feet of lot 2, block 29 Smith and Taylors Addition North St. Paul ` 16 Attachment 9 r WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: as initiatedtiated b Sauro Realty pursuant to 2 11 This conditional use perms t w y the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. was reviewed b the Maplewood•PlanningZ. This conditional use. permit . y August 15 1983. The Planning Commission recommended to Commi ss i on on Aug _ the City Council that said permit be approved. od City Council held a public hearing on • 3. The Mapl ewo y and maileded 1983 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published . ursuant to law. All. persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity-to be heard present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and Planning Commi ss on. NOW, THEREFORE, BE. IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the a permit be approved on the basis of the following above - described conditional use p findings of fact: The use would conform - wi th the cs Plan and with theCp purpose and standards of the Zoning Code. 2. The establish ment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to publicthe health, safety or general welfare* 30 The use would be located, designed, maintaine d and operated to be compatible with the character of the zoning district. P4. The use would not de reciate.property values. or disturbing to present and 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental 9 and uses due to noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, potential surrounding 1 fumes, water poll u ,tion water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness electrical interference or other nuisancese minimal vehicular traffic on local streets 6. The use would generate only d create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs and would not that will cause undue burden to the area properties.. essential public services, such as streets, 7. The use would be served by essent police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks.P al requirements at public cost 80 The use would not create excessive addition for public face 1 i ti es and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. There are .no significant natural features on the si 10o The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. s subjectApproval ub'ect to the following conditions: ode * a ows a one time s i x t month Constructs on beginningng wi thi n one year. C 1 ' The_ applicant must .apply for such ex- extension 1f dust cause s shown. ion i n wri ti n at least thirty days prior -to expi rate on.tens 9 17 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit 'for any of the structures which do nof front on Count Road B. Council must order the extension of a water main north along van Dyke Street from County Road B. 3. Final grading, drainagenaa and utility plans must be approved by the City Engineer. in Count40Anyconnectiontoutilities y Road B or temporary curb cuts to t Road B must be approved in writing by the Ramsey County DepartmentCountyP . of Public Works. 50 Submi ssion of an erosion control plan prior to issuance of any building permit s , which incorporates the recommendations of the Watershed and Soil and Water Conservation Districts. de sanitary6. Granting of twenty -foot w y sewer easements, centered on the existingi lines located in the vacated Sandhurst Avenue and Laurie Road. Adopted this day of - 1983. Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) d bei the du qualified and appointed Clerk of the I, the undersigne g y 9 • Minnesota do hereby certify that I have carefully comparedCitofMaplewood, itandforegoingextractofminutesofaregularmeetingoftheCitytheattached99 o p -f Maplewood, ewood held on the day of 1983 , with the . on g final on file in my office,and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permit. ywitnessm hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal. of the City this day of 1983. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 18 Q i MEMORANDUM .:,.. r :........ r , TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Public Forks SUBJECT: Water Mai Petition; VanDyke Street; Co. Road. Cope Avenue DATE: September 19, 1983 The attached petition requests the extension of water main along VanDkye Street from Count Road "B" to Cope Avenue. The petition is signed byCounty .. 34/ of the affected frontage, just short of the 35/ requi red by law. If this project i to be considered further, the City Council must initiate the investigation. If the E.T. Hughes 'Developmentment proposal is to proceed water main must be extended on the VanDyke Street. In order for this project to proceed the Council should authorize staff to prepare a feasibility study. Accord - in 9 to Council resolution the petition. sponsor should be required to pay the cost of feasibility study. mb ate., the undersigned, do hereby petition the Counci of the City of M to:y a install.water service in Van Dyke Street between County Road "B" and Cope Avenue To be conditional upon closing of sale of: . the E 495.6 ft of lots 1 & 2, Block 29, Smith & Taylors add. to North St. Paul to E. T. Hughes Construction Company by October.20, 1983. ind that the said improvement be undertaken by the Village 'Counci in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,, Chapter .429; and that the cost thereof be assessed Against benefi tted property as provided by said Chapter 429. WNER STREET ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT. DATE X 00 The East 495.6 ft. of Lots 1 22 , Bl . 9 , Smith & Taylor's7Sa_,HLe Adrl,i-n North St. Paul AGE ljfpI/ Part of Lot 1, Block 20; See attached legal description 6 r Part of Lot 2, Block 20; See attached legal description Part of Lot 2, Block A), See attached legal description A certify that I have witnessed the above signatures, /land the p oposed imp vements were i=scussed with the signers. ,,RRfV r e, Vr u . r * DATE) PETITION SPO SOR 36R 4e, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Counci 1 of the City of Maplew god to d C einstallwaterserviceinVanDykeStreetbetweenCountyRoadBanop Avenue To be conditional upon closing of sale of: To E.T. Hughes Construction Co. Ir Part of Lot 1 bl 20 Part of Lot 2 bl 20 -- Smith & Taylors Addition to North St. Paul Pa t of Lot2 bl 13inithatthesaidimprovement be undertaken by the Pillage Council in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429; and that the cost thereof be assessed jg,.ainst benefitted property as provided by said Chapter 429. OWNER STREET ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT -- DATE x x X z certify that I muidtness the above signatures, but the proposedtmprovements were liscussed with the signers at great length.Z- 1,A j. tiv-E!5 cLr,l ,; c. JDATE) PETITION SPONSOR 36- AGE The East 495.6 ft.of Lots 1 2, Bl . 29 , Smith & Taylor's Mj4mi4e 0 R • ¢%. 00-/t . 33 i,'? Part of Lot 1, Block 20; See at legal description 6 w j i R io, fl 3 3 J. Part of Lot 2 , Block 20; See attached legal desc riprt ion i /i ,/I M 1Y . i Part of Lot 2, Block , attached legal. descriY.t z certify that I muidtness the above signatures, but the proposedtmprovements were liscussed with the signers at great length.Z- 1,A j. tiv-E!5 cLr,l ,; c. JDATE) PETITION SPONSOR 36- E MEMORANDUM T0: ' City Council FROM: Barry R. Evans, City Manager SUBJECT: Vacancies in Police Department DATE_: October 4, 1983 Action br Council: Endorsed----„_.,... Modifie Rejected Date As you are aware, you have approved an Public Safety Dispatcher in the 1984 Budget. We would l i k e Co -unci l permission to begin this position now along with filling an existing dispatcher position, There are several reasons why we would like to have both these appointments made at once, and they are: 1. We are currently understaffed on patrol by . three 'officers. Two vacancies exist, and one officer is on extended injury status. 2. We currently have one existing vacancy for Public Safety Dispatcher. This has existed since June 29, 1983. 3. It would simplify training by allowing us both candidates at once. 4. The individual who is second on the dispatcher l i s t is Reed Santa, who is on Worker "s Comp as a result of an injury on the job in Community Services, The City is paying the cost during his time on Worker' Comp, and putting him in a working position would save us money in both an immediate and long range sense. Your consideration of, this w.i 1 l be appreci a ed. BRElnb MEMORANDUM 4r 2W.- Action by Council: TO: City Manager Endorse - FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson Modifie Preliminary Plat and PUD - SUBJECT:- Time Extension )ReJ a of a d___.._PROJECT: Goff' s Mapl evi ew Addition ~ LOCATION: ..County HRoadCandtheHihwa 61 Frontage Road Date APPLICANT: Patrick Goff OWNER: Rehbein - Husnik Development Co. DATE: September 29, 1983 SUMMARY Request A time extension for the unpl atted portion-of Goff' s Mapl evi ew Addition preliminary plat and al anned unit development (PUD). Reasons for Request 1. The applicant is in the process of obtaining a developer's agreement to construct the north cul -de -sac, proposed as Hilltop Court (page 4 ). 2. Once Hilltop Court is constructed, final plat approval will be requested for Goff' s Mapl evi ew 2nd Addition. 3. A total of 44 double dwelling units (22 buildings) are proposed within the PUD, each with an attached, double garage. Comments The applicant has made a good faith effort to develop this property in a timely manner. Construction of the Highway 61 Frontage Road is now underway, permit- ting the applicant to proceed with this development. Recommendation Approval of a one -.year time extens for Phase II and a (up to f i ve) year extension for Goff's Maplewood planned unit development and the remaining undeveloped portion of the preliminary plat by the same name, on the basis that: 1. The construction of the Highway 61 Frontage Road is in progress. The Frontage Road will provide access to the southern portion of the applicant's site. 2: The aDpl i cant has made a good faith effort to develop the site in a timely manner. BACKGROUND pact Artinn 8 7 - 80. Council pp MapleviewiarovedGoff' s Addi ton planned unit development and preliminary plat, subject to: 1. Approval of final grading and drainage plans. 2. Dedication of right-of-way and sewer easements for the frontage road under construction) along with the first phase of development. 3. Desi nation of the property lying south of the drainage easement line as9 an outlot and deeding it to the city. 4. Submitting a developer's. agreement for a trail to connect the proposed southerly cul -de -sac with the property to the east. 11- 20 -80; 2- 19 -81 9- 17 -81: Counci 1 approved 90 -day time extensi subject to the ' on gi nal conditions for the preliminary plat, less the three lots front- ing on County Road C which had received final plat approval on 11- 20 -80. 9 - 13 p, -82: Council approved a one-year time extension for the prel imi nary plat, except the three lots fronting on County Road C. 9- 26 -83: The Parks Commission recommended that a mini -park should not be located within the proposed development. Planning 1. Section 36 -.442 (e) states that "all conditional use permits shall be reviewed by Council within one year of the initial approval. At that time Council may specify an indefinite term or specific term not to exceed five years, for subsequent reviews." 2. Section 30 - (e) of the subdivision code provides that for one year follow- ing preliminary approval and for two years following final plat approval unless the subdivider and the city agree otherwise, no amendment to a Comprehensive Plan or official control shall apply to or affect the use, develop density, lot.size, lot layout or dedication or platting requiredp • its reorpermittedbytheapprovedapplication. Thereafter,pursuant to u-g lations, the city may extend the period by agreement with the subdivider and subject to all applicable performance conditions and requirements,. or it may require submission of a new application, unless substantial physical activity and investment has occurred in reasonable reliance on the approved application and the subdivider will suffer substantial financial damage as a consequence of 'a requirement to submit a new application. In connectionq with a subdivision involving planned and staged development, the city may by resolution and agreement grant the rights referred to herein for such periods of time longer than .two (2) years which it determines to be reason - able and appropriate." Procedure Council decision Attachments 1. Goff's Mapleview Additon Planned Unit Development 2. Goff's Mapleview 2nd Addition 3. Neighborhood Park Concept Map 2 - i rig L i rte •"' ...,ADr. 77"Ic-1 1 i l.( on ` 1 1 Alm i ` t ' 0 i • aw dr M 4W W am ap NK f& go:0 CCuk ROAD iF p ,,, =^ rA r I q4b. i k4 00 601 W L A N D FIF1F'; B1lAlI 1EIIlE 61VD A DDpTIGIV Attachment Two 4 r-.3 MEMORANDUM Action by Council: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: DATE: Request City Manager Director of Community Development Endorsed_.......__,.....,. Plan Amendment (RM to RL) = Modifie Co. Road B, Birmingham St. and ' Cope Ave Rejecte September 8, 1983 Date .,_....__,.... SUMMARY The City Council initiated an amendment to the City's land use plan from RM, residential medium density to RL, residential low density. Reason for the Request No specific development is proposed. The City Council initiated thi s to determine whether multiple dwellings would be compatible with the single dwellings to the east. Alternatives 1. Make no change This does not seem realistic since most of the Cope Avenue and Birmingham Street frontages are developed with single dwellings. Planning multiple d w e l l i n g s for these frontages would also be inconsistent with the City's policy of having similar uses fronting on , the same street. 2. Designate pesinatetheCope Avenue and Birmingham Street frontages for RL development. (See map on page 7.) This is the best solution, because it recognizes the existing homes, avoid multiple dwellings on Birmingham Street and maintains the undeveloped itlandformultiples. This is consistent with one of the C 's residentialy objectives of providingn "a variety of housing types within neighborhoods."P 9 3. Designate the entire site for RL use There are two problems: a. The railroad tracks make it harder to market this land for single dwellings than multiple dwellings. Multiple dwellings can be. clustered and oriented away from the tracks mendments the Cityb. because of recent plan a y has been losing land for multiple dwellings. The result is that we will probably not meet the 7 1990 housing goals in the plan. i s that there woulli be less traffic.The advantage of the RL designation _ Recommendation Approval of the enclosed resolution changing the land use designation of the on a Cope Avenue and Birmingham Street frontages from RM to RL, as shown e 79pageP while leaving the balance of the property RM. BACKGROUND Site Description Acreage: 13 (staff proposal: 7.0 net acres RM, 4.5 acres RL and 1.5 acres for a future street) - Existing Land Use: Undeveloped and single dwellings T Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Cope Avenue. North of Cope Avenue is the Dayton's Bluff Sheet Metal building Easterly: Birmingham Street and single dwellings Southerly: County Road B and Weaver Elementary School Westerly: Burlington Northern tracks and undeveloped land planned for RM, residential medium density use. Past Actions 9- 21 -78: Council denied a preliminary plat for six lots north of County Road B. The developer planned to. construct two single dwellings, two double dwel- lings and an apartment building. He defaulted on his contract with the property owner. 10- 19 -78: Council approved a PUD for double dwellings and four - plexes west of the tracks. The developer let the time period expire for the approval. 2- 14 -83: Council established a one -year moratorium on rezoni ngs from R -1 to R -3, multiple. The purpose is to review RM designations adjacent to single dwelling neighborhoods and determine whether the RM land should be RL, resi- dential low density. 5- 16 -83: The council and planning commission, at a joint meeting, decided on the specific RM areas to be studied. This site is one of them. Planning 1. The RM designation is for multiple dwel l i ngs and single dwell i ngs on smaller lots at a maximum density of 22 people for each net acre. This is approximately 7 -9 units for each net acre. 2. The RL designation is for single dwellings with an occasional double dwellings at a maximum density of 14 people for each net acre. This is approximately 3 -4 units for each net acre. 3. Page 18 -5 of the comprehensive plan states that: . "WheneveT possible, changes in types of land.use shall occur at center, mid -bl -ock points, so that similar uses front on the same street, or at borders -f areas separated by major man -made or natural barriers." 2 - 4. The estimated maximum number of multiple dwellings that could be built on the undeveloped RM land is: 20 single dwel 1 i.ngs 38 double - dwelling units (17 buildings) . 47 two - bedroom touwhouse units = 62 two - bedroom apartments i Council can limit the type of development through zoning. 50 Page 18 -18 of the comprehensive plan states that "Residential areas should be encouraged, planned, and guided to provide a variety of housing types within neighborhoods: b. Zoning: R -1, residence district (singe dwelling) the roproperty owners within 350 ft. of the site. Of the 26 whoStaffsurveyedppy responded, 17 were in of the amendment, three had no position and six were opposed. Those -in favor were primarily against multiple dwellings, par- ticularly low income, and were concerned about stormwater problems. A letter from Don Olson (.1397 County Road 6) is enclosed, concerning storm water. Those opposed to the change feel there is a need for multiple dwellings and smaller single - dwelling lots. Another concern was that single -p dwell in developersgp would not want to build near the tracks and the property could not be sold with R -1 zoning. Several letters are enclosed. Procedure 1. Planning commission recommendation after a public hearing 2. City council decision 3. Metropolitan Council review mb Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line Map 3. Plan Flap 4, Staff Proposed Amendment 5. Letters from Residents 6. Resolution 3 _ KOHL MAN AVE. -• c 16 ROAD "C" IL J) W J W I.; '.A-tr 0 J rl M } o z z EDGEHILL RD. AVE to _ < oN 0 -1 .00 = 65 FONT 4 D h ` DEMONT AV w VF /. AVE R a U)ra5k00KS CT. o AVT4.• / < Q Q ' SEX GERVAIS E. A = VAI RVAI t G A IEW Lam._.! COURT 36 VIK I DR. SHERREN AVE L H CON$T 83goPLf , E. ON lner co cT LA K AVE. LARK AVE. 1,: ~ LARK AVE. 25 _ eke T or e - R LAURIE RD. Z ccc LAURIE RD Y a ac LE L AN < z AVE. 65 HaD J a e 64F z < v o JUN CT AVE. C] < _ U RKE AVE. 8U KE AVE t EL DRIDS AVE ; `pqyA C 4 v J 4i PUBLIC WO pN BELMON T oc VE. N ` SLOG• t s Q , VE S N o AVE. _ ' NA R1S LOCATION MAP 4 _Attachment One AVE o aYpN t~ RFCRC-n 28 FROST v IL 27 FE MT. 0N AVE. 62 49 O ; t a FRISDIE AVE. 3 •RIPLEY AV Q Loke •! 80 PH IA AVE V) Pho /en ~ z o z 62 k- IL NT 30 Q Ros WOOD AVE. LRY AN Of VE ~ 28 Wt — i d: IR •' su R W 4 r 0 2 Wakefield w w Cr It W Loke 29 SOP AVE z a 3 < y PRI E A GJ > AV F1 FIF] 11 @,f 65 7 ST. PAUL I N t 04 i I.. I Itf 114POI _ 1 l i f l ! -.:1 h3 4 3 2 1404 I L I I _ i - .' I •- •! - f „ I ,_ I ,y I 1 -• I I i I.. I22511f ,1419, I • t LAR AV 1429 1 I :' , I .1 ;I 1_- 1 ..• - - -, 11, 23 I- t J : A ! . LAURIE 2211 , I i f 1 ' I ..• I' I I l l l -! 2212' t r -I Ia f I - 2 0 14 3 it 211 142 I I 1 I f I I I1 Y I•, I I • — ! __ _ -1- 0 1412 1 s 010 ;_ I D15T 1140 r e - PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 5 _ Attachment two L l: 1 1 T 1, -; 1 tt r ! 85,.E EI DAYTONS -BLUFF - 4 f- + j SHEET METAL t 04 i I.. I Itf 114POI _ 1 l i f l ! -.:1 h3 4 3 2 1404 I L I I _ i - .' I •- •! - f „ I ,_ I ,y I 1 -• I I i I.. I22511f ,1419, I • t LAR AV 1429 1 I :' , I .1 ;I 1_- 1 ..• - - -, 11, 23 I- t J : A ! . LAURIE 2211 , I i f 1 ' I ..• I' I I l l l -! 2212' t r -I Ia f I - 2 0 14 3 it 211 142 I I 1 I f I I I1 Y I•, I I • — ! __ _ -1- 0 1412 1 s 010 ;_ I D15T 1140 r e - PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 5 _ Attachment two L l: ra dMO. oft" I_ -_ ..—._' ' yam • Jv a O C31 Y interi bL , wa Sherw Glen NEIGHBORHOOD LRND IiSE PLAN CURRENT PLAN Attachment Th 6 d Iwo 4 I. A • , ' ' 4Ai ION s + •, I C r DAYTONS BLUFF SHEET METAL 147 - 114 I i 1 I i r ~:' ri •;; r:' 1'` t' 1191 i 1 i I i t l i i { AA 142 Q 4 I '' _• '•'' ;''' ••• • 1 T- 23 I cc Q3 1 j SAt, ,r riST l LD r I tIiI ! t I i: :• I 14-Z . i i I ! I I'• '- - i 1 t • I t I - I i _ I , •' I - I . . I - f I ' :; '14 I { t I - P4 - koo.IDi I N e 21 AV E r STAFF PROPOSED AMENDMENT Area proposed for RL _ 7 _ August 15, 1983 City of Maplewood Office of Community Development Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Sirs: I have, lived at 1397 E. County Rd. B, since December 1, 1954, almost 29 years. There has been a at—er drainage problem here for all of these years. Since the Weaver Grade School was built across the street from my home, the water problem has accelerated. Nhen the school was built, the engineer showed me a plot of the drainage area, from the culvert in front of my home to the deepest part of the land, which would now be the drainage area. It was only one foot deeper than at the end of the culvert. The original drainage area has through the yaars been raised by sediment, grass, and weeds growing there, and even the original foot of drainage has been lessened. As the drainage area is part of the school yard, no one 1vou ld stand for deepening this drainage area. Today ever_ a moderate rain results in -rater draining from all four directions to pass through the culvert, causing the water 'to back up into my and my neighbor's yards. It is not unusual for it to back up far enough to enter my basement window well. If building is allured in the area suggested, the land will have to be raised at the west side V . Lt the railroad tracks in order for the sewer connections to drain to Barclay Street on the east. The raising of this land elevation to the west will naturally increase the drainage to the east do-orn Barclay Street and will end up with water in front of my house. The culvert on County Rd. B and the area it drains into, the Vle aver Grade School yard, is inade qzi ate to handle both the surge of water and also the amount of water that will accrue. I would most heartily reccrosnend that .a complete feasability study be made to handle this water problem by the Contractor and Engineer before any permits to A. build are issued. I assure yov I will be following your recommendations and decisions with my full attention. I hope you can come up with a plan that will not aggravate the present V:ater drainage condition, as I do not intend for my home and property to be sacrificed so that some builder can benefit financially. S i neerely, L L-e- Le Donald F. Olson 1397 E.. County Rd. B Maplewood, IT. 55109 Phone J777-2512 I/ — / /10f3 U Oo oil2 - d 4004 70 Ixe— CY000ow N ' S w v 4/ a oor dob Pub kL X38 - oez-,(o 7 10 _ CITY OF aus 15l°' MAPLEWO.0D 1902 EAST COUNTY ROAD B - MAPLEwboD, MINNESOTA 55109 s OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT = 770 -4560 Eugene- Grape 2211 Birmingham Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Maplewood Resident: f The City of Maplewood will be considering amending the city's land use plan from RM, medium density residential to RL, low density residential for the area on the enclosed maps. RM al-lows double and multiple dwellings- at about 7 -9 units /acre'. RL allows single dwellings and an occasional doubl dwelling at 3 -4 units /acre. No specific development is proposed at this time. Hearings on thi s project have not been scheduled yet. This letter is to ask your opinion, before a formal recommendation is made by the city staff for a public. hearing. You will- receive an official notice when the hearing is scheduled. Please answer the questions below and return this form to me in the enclosed postage -paid envelope by August 15th. If you would l i k e further information, please call: me at 770 -4560, between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.' Thank you for your comments. They wi be given careful consideration. Sincerely, Geoff t1son, AICP Director - of Community Development mb NiEnc. I am-in favor of : this proposal have no opinion Z. I have the following objecti to this proposal: a t PambM-W F W r ' F7 4 f IleC po t j 4r - • Z I t f I d Z.An*1 L A R K el- awl ff–olp l9r_ — 22411 142 vi A rr 14,2 3 LA U RI E 12 0 Ilk, 11 3 jct211s I 1 5 A V 16 X14? J.: 0 141231 - f t ! li &S ck 00. DiT NO 6 4A oftcc6ALWAVE . —• — .—. lob e% it LINE Z4NING MAPPROPERTY- 13 rl X1 q tt C Loa- I i U tlloi DAYTONS -BLUFF SHEET NETAL co i I - 4 31141p 34 3 1 404 h ' , t t 1 — t 1 225 f t + i 11.449 IL el- awl ff–olp l9r_ — 22411 142 vi A rr 14,2 3 LA U RI E 12 0 Ilk, 11 3 jct211s I 1 5 A V 16 X14? J.: 0 141231 - f t ! li &S ck 00. DiT NO 6 4A oftcc6ALWAVE . —• — .—. lob e% it LINE Z4NING MAPPROPERTY- 13 4 T: The Derrick Companies 1650 Shelard Tower • Minneapolis, MN 55426 • 612 /546 -2276 I August 1983 y ,. T i Mr. Geoff Olson Director of Community Development City .of Maplewood 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Olson: Thank you for your .letter concerning the Cope /Birmingham property. As a general practice, I would discourage the City from rezoning or replanning any land from higher to lower density residential status. Our firm has in recent years developed hundreds of single family lots in ten communities around the Twin Cities from Stillwater to Minnetonka. We have found recently, however, that costs are increasingly reducing the number of buyers capable of purchasing even a "starter" single family house. We and other developers /builders are looking toward smaller lots and smaller houses to help solve this problem. In the same fashion, mid and high density housing will increasingly be needed to satisfy lower cost housing needs in Maplewood, in the Twin Cities, and in the nation. I must emphasize that I am speaking .here not of the poor or the unemployed -- surely their needs also must be served in some fashion. I am speaking of young people with one to two incomes between them -- -in the Twin Cities we are not producing sufficient housing to keep up with their needs. I hope this will be of some assistance in your deliberations. Sincerely, W. Kurt ghinghouse, Vice President Derrick Land Company 14 - Plan Amendment Resolution RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an.amendment to the Maplewood comprehensive plan from RM, residential medium density to RL, residential low density for the following-described property: s The easterl lots on Birmingham Street an.d the southerl frontage lots on Cope Avenue between Cope Avenue, County Road B, Birmingham Street and the tracks. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. This plan amendment was initiated by the City of Maplewood. 2. The Maplewood planning commission held a public hearing on September 19, .1983, to con's i der this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said plan amendment be 3. The Maplewood city council considered said plan amendment on 1983. The council considered reports and recom- mendations from the planning commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described plan amendment be approved on the basis that all of the lots, except one, are already developed with single dwellings. Adopted this day of 1983. Seconded by Ayes -- Attachment Six 15 - f s PUBLIC H A. Plan Amendment =- County Road B, Birmingham and CopeP Due to equipment not operating LOrrectl testim and d'Y y discussionon was not recorded for* minutes. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission forward t hefollowingresolutiontotheCityCouncil: WHEREAS, The City of Maplewoodewood initiated aP n amendment to the MaplewoodcomprehensiveplanfromRM, residential medium density o RL residentiallowdensityfory ' y he following-described1owing- descri bed property: The easterly frontage lots on Birmingham9g Street and the southerly frontage lots on Cope Avenue between CopeAvenue, County B, Birmingham Street and the tracks,s. h3W THEREFORE; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEW OOD PLANNING COMMISSIONthattheabove-described plan amendment be approved on the basis thatallofthelots, except one, are already developed with single dwellings,The amendment recognizes the existing homes, would avoid multipledwel1ingsonBirminghamStreetandmaintaintheundeveloped1and for multiples. This is consistent with the City's residential objectivesofproviding "a variety .of housing types within neighborhoods." Commss loner El 1 efson seconded Ayes -- Commissioner Barrett E1 f1e son,Fischer, Hejny, Prew, Robens, Si gmundi k, Whitcomb MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Plan Amendment (RM to RL) LOCATION: Curve Avenue, between Ripley and Larpenteur Ave. APPLICANT. City Council OWNERS: Tony and Philip Oswald DATE: September 14, 1983 SUMMARY R r- ti Action by Council: Endorse y Modifie Raj ecte z The City Council initiated an amendment to the City's land use plan from RM, residential medium density to RL, residential lower density at a joint meeting with the Planning Commission on May 16. Reason for the Request No specific development is proposed. The City Council initiated thi s to determine whether multiple dwellings would be compatible with single dwell- ings to the east. Comments The problem in this case is deciding what type of land use would be compatible with adjacent homes and still allow the Oswalds a reasonable use of their land. There are two alternatives: 1. Amend the Plan to RL, which would limit development to thirteen single dwellings. As shown by the survey done (see page 3 ), single dwelling homes are preferred by the adjacent homeowners. Unfortunately, single dwellings are probably not feasible. Since there are lots on only one side of the street, the cost for each lot for street and utilities would be unreasonably high. In addition, the lots face a well-traveled railroad line that makes the lots less than average value. While Council could allow a rural street, without curb. and gutter, the cost savings would probably not be enough to make development feasible. Council must consider whether it is fair to, in effect, deny reasonable use of the I roperty by changing the. plan to RL. 2. Leave the RM designation i This is probably necessary for reasonable use of the property. This density is needed to development feasible. Council has several a zoning options.to limit the type and number of units: - R -2 double d w e l l i n g s (maximum of 11 b u i l d i n g s or 22 units).;- R -3C, townhouses (maximum of 23 two- bedroom units) R -3, townhouses or apartments (maximum.of 30 two - bedroom units) Recommendation Leave this site RM, residential medium density. 1 BACKGROUND Site Description Dross acreage: 4.5 Net Acreage: 3.4 T Existing land use: There are single dwellings on the north and- a double 4wel l ing on the south. Curve Avenue is a 50 foot wide, undeveloped right of -way. Surroundinq Land Uses Northerly: Ripley Avenue and single dwellings Easterly: Single dwellings Southerly: Larpenteur Avenue Westerly: Railroad right -of -way Past Actions 1- 18 -79: A conditional use permit was approved for a double dwelling at the corner of Curve Avenue and Larpenteu r Avenue. 10- 18 -82: The Planning Commission recommended amending the land use plan from RM, residential medium density to RL, residential lower density for the property to the north and west of the tracks. The Oswal ds' property was l eft RM. 11 -8 -82: Council approved the amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission. 2- 14 -83: Counci 1 .establ i shed a one -year moratorium on rezoni ngs from R -1 to R -3, multiple. The purpose is to review certain RM designations on the 1 and use p lan and determine whether they should be RL, residential low density. 5- 16-83: The Council and Planning Commission, at a joint meeting, decided on the specific RM areas to be studied. Planning 1. The RM designation is for multiple dwellings and single dwellings on smaller lots at a maximum density of 22 people for each net acre. This is approximately 7 -9 units for each acre. 2. The RL designation is for single dwellings with an occasional double dwelling at a maximum density of 14 people for each net acre. This is approximately 3 -4 units for each acre. 30" Page 18 -5 of the Comprehensive Plan states that "whenever possible, changes i in types of land use shall occur at center, mid -block points, so-that Similar uses front on the same street, or at borders of areas separated by major man -made or natural barriers." 4. Page 18 -18 of the Comprehensive Plan states that "residential areas should be encouraged, planned, and guided to provide a variety of housing types within neighborhoods." 2 5. Zoning: R -1, residence district (single dwelling) Public Works Section 29- 52(a)(4) of City Code states that "... concrete curbing or curb and 9 utter shall be installed at the same time as street surfaci rTg; except that, where a permanent "rural" street design is approved the council, curbs will not be required... Cfti Comments One of the property owners Tony Oswald, stated at the Planning Commission1. P P y meeting of October 18, 1982 that he had an estimate for construction of Curve Street and it was not feasible to construct thirteen single dwellings. He further added in.the last survey that an RL designation would make his land worthless because of the cost of street and services. 2. Staff sent a survey to the property owners within 350 feet of the site. Of the 29 re P 1 i es , - 21 favored a change to , RL , five had no opini three favored RM and two wanted open space. Two comments on RL were received. One felt that apartments would degrade the neighborhood. An example of the apartments at English and Ripley was given. The other comment was as follows: "It-wouldn't look good to have multiple dwellings next to single family houses, it would ru.i n the look of the neighborhood. I enjoy open spaces and if I didn't I'd move to the city where the houses are close together and filled with big apt. bl dgs . There s plenty of multiple dwellings empty now, we don't need anymore." One comment for RM was received: "The area under consideration will face a street which borders an existing railroad track which is in use. It would seem very unlikely that single residential homes would ever b built on these lots which face west. In order that the property could be developed the RM use must be retained. I have no interest in the property, but believe it is in the best interest of the City to develop the land. Two comments for open space were received: "1. To close to R.R. tracks, dangerous for children, 2. Sewer and street costs, who will absorb costs? 3. Additional traffic not wanted or needed, 4. Noise pollution and 5. Poor access." Preserve.the wildlife (pheasants, rabbits, etc.). Keep some open land. Extra traffic.-unsafe being near railroad tracks, too many kids, people and houses in the area as is. Don't want the assessments- -we're taxed heavil y inner as is. If we want-all that congestion we might as well move to the city. I am totall against it!! P- ocedure Planningn Commission holds public hearing and makes a recommdati on to the1. g - _ City Council. _ 20 City Council decision 3. Metropolitan Council review iw Enclosures 1. Location Map 2, Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Plan Map 3 Z 49 ROAD U) J CL 9) cc u AVE o . I EDGEMLL RD. c ft. -le w It. cco 49 J,- 6S z DEMONT AV I ter 44 dlT AVE. 1 BfkQQKs cr Lu ks AV 11 f1h AVE. L GERVAIS AV E. Q VA S RVA AV 0 A COURT • 36 IKI 0R. CASTLE AV* SHEAREN AV H RAEN AVE0,0,4/s 77 46.3COPEAVE Ko fle r 0 P.E AVE. Cl LARK :AV:E]. LARK AVE. Lo* S2UNTY 2j [LAURIE J. w0zRD Y LELAN,31 25 x. SA zlz AVE 65 ' : 0 JUN 64 t jWAVE. U MIKE oc AVE. ou ELDRIDG -91 AVE.9 4 MAPLEW OD0 0 1 PUBLIC WORKSpNWfAiI . / > ELMONIT lzi AVE. 64 BLDG. ' s VE SKILIMA M 140 AVE. z ' R ` 111,00, : o MA 13 11000 RYAN / 4 Ros WOOD AVE. CRY AN : otVALECRCAT'1R E 1[ 11 z x28 L) I.: 1..; 0-: ).- 0 1. 1-:F ROS T aiI AVE al 2 d--G- oke. I & R vlo > nnno ST. PA 0 nnnr P* ER A w oc Wokefield Lak e i r 1 I 1 14 r S n .c O y z 4 c :,g t s 91 541 r i •54..5 6 v 3 .a[ W 3e bl i • ti oc... c 7 7 6 6 ee S r '- 1 s iy4 it 1 Wn v 11 Lei OL J M 6i Za i 2• 7-1 Z4e 49 P i 4 1 I 1 44 N f en A Q lS 1G S 4 43/4' ji 1 14 IS 12 to 19 I1 g t a E- ! - *o% 7 7 6 6 ee S r '- 1 s iy4 it 1 Wn v 11 i N OL J M 6i 1 7-1 Z4e 49 P i 4 1 I 0 N f en A Q lS 1G S 4 43/4' 60• _ • . _, _` . _ o k sod 84 f aG _1 -r 1 °0 1 FS4 1 F4 I a1' 1 -u 1334 -1 33 vilM - .IL I'm I L.U" 2 Cse- PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 3 -Attachment Two 4 N Wn v 11 i OL J M 6i n 49 P i 4 1 I N f en A J f n 1 14 IS NA i to 60• _ • . _, _` . _ o k sod 84 f aG _1 -r 1 °0 1 FS4 1 F4 I a1' 1 -u 1334 -1 33 vilM - .IL I'm I L.U" 2 Cse- PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 3 -Attachment Two 4 N ci iAL 1ty2 SG n 49 4 N f en A to I1 g 1 E- ! - *o% 60• _ • . _, _` . _ o k sod 84 f aG _1 -r 1 °0 1 FS4 1 F4 I a1' 1 -u 1334 -1 33 vilM - .IL I'm I L.U" 2 Cse- PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 3 -Attachment Two 4 N T t O V O MV Gladstone NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN Attachment Thr y T B. Plan Amendment-- Larpenteur, the tracks and Ripley Secretary Olson said the City Council initiated an amendment to the landi use plan from RM to RL. Staff is recommending the site remain RM. Chairman Prew asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment on the proposal. P h i l i p Oswald, 2676 English Street, owner of the north 7 lots shown on the map. He,is favor of the RM designation remaining. It would be too costly to install . the street to develop the property for single dwelling. Tony Oswald, 1.700 Rosewood, owner of the southern l o t s , agreed it would be too costly to install a street. Housing that could be built there is not selling at this time. He felt it should stay R.M. Chairman Prew closed, the public hearing portion of the meeting. r Commissioner Whitcomb moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that the site remain RM residential medium dens i t f r reasons outlined i.n the staff report dated September 14, 1983, Commissioner Hejny seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Barrett, El 1 efson, Fischer, Hej ny, Prew, Robens, Si gmundi k, Whitcomb , 2 9 -19 -83 MEMORANDUM Action by Council: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: City Manager Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner Conditional Use Permit Renewal 1829 White Bear Avenue Dorothy Hejny Hejny Rental September 29, 1983 Endorsed.....,._..., -_ l ZeJected..._. r Date SUMMARY Request Renewal of a conditional use permit to continue the operation of a rental equip- ment business in a neighborhood planned and zoned for residential use. Comments (Compliance with previous condi ti ons ) 1. The additional right -of -way of 10.5 feet has been dedicated to Ramsey County for street widening. 2. The required fifteen foot setback from the new right-of-way l i n e is being met. 3. The applicant is i n . the process of completing the landscaping i n front of the equipment parking area. This amounts to sodding and shifting of the planting beds to the west from the right -of -way. All of the .areas for plantings, as shown on the approved landscape plan, have been planted, but the number of shrubs to be installed is a little short. The shrubs that have not been installed are eleven Gol drop Potenti l l a in front of the house, two Gol drop Potenti l l a in a planting bed along the boulevard and four Emerald Mound Honeysuckle along the boulevard. Staff does not have any problem with 'the landscaping as installed. The potenti l l as that would be in front of the house would not be easily visible from the street and the planting beds along the boulevard are such that six more shrubs would not be of any aesthetic benefit. All other site improve- ments have been made. Recommendation Adbpti on of the resolution on page 6 renewing the conditional use permit for Hejny Rental for (up to five years or indefinitely) . Z. i PAST ACTION 7- 24 -80: Council renewed the conditional use permit for three years for Hejny Rental (originally approved 10 -5 -61) provided the following conditions are met: 1. Dedication of 10.5 feet of additional right -of -way to accommodate the future expansion of .White Bear Avenue. r -• 2.= All -- vehicles. and equipment shall be parked. so as *to maintain 15 -foot setback from the White Bear Avenue right-of-way. 3. Within three months of renewal, an acceptable site plan shall have been submitted to the Community Design Review Board for lots 11. and 12, block 1, Garden Acres. The site plan shall be consistent with City site design requirements, commonly required by similar business; e.g., a paved driveway and parking lot, curbing, landscaping, and screening. All permanent improve- ments are to be completed within three years of the date of this renewal. 10 The Communi Des Rev, i ew Board approved the site plan for Hejny Rental, subject to the following conditions: 1. SI gnage shall be reviewed and approved by staff. 2. The appl i cant shat 1 comply with the conditions of the conditional use permit. 3. The area in front of the parking l timber shall be sodded and .this area shall not be used for the parking of vehicles.. 4. Directional signs must be posted at ingress and egress points.. 5. Owner and applicant agree to, the above conditions in writing. CODE CONSIDERATIONS Section 36 -442 of the City Code states the following concerning conditional use permits te) All conditional use permits shall be reviewed by the counci within one year of the date of initial approval.. At that review the council may specify an indefinite term or specific term, not to exceed five ( 5 ) years, for subsequent reviews The council may impose new or additional conditions upon the permit at the time of the initial or subsequent reviews. A conditional use permit shall remain in effect as long as the conditions agreed upon are observed, but nothing in this secti shall prevent the city from enacti or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Any conditional use that meets t the agreed upon condi and i later disallowed because of the city enacting or amending official controls shall be considered a legal non - conforming use. f The council may, upon review, terminate the permit i f the approvedyp . conditions may have been violated or the use is no longer i n 'effect. Where the construction of a special building or structure of a monetary value in of twen thousand ( $ 25,000-00) permitted the counc 1excessyhasbeen shall provide for a period of amortization of not less than five (5) years. 2 Where P ubl i c health, safety and welfare concerns are threatened the five year amortization period is not required and the council may .determine the amortization period, if any, . to be allowed. g)In the event the council in its review process decides-to consider imposing additional conditions or termination of a conditional use permit, the city council shall hold at least one public hearing on that permit after a notice of the , heari ng - has been publ i shed i n the. off i c al newspaper at 1 east ten (10) days before said hearing. The council shall also cause a notice to be mailed to each of the owners of property within three h[ffidred fifty 350) feet of the boundary lines of the property; upon which such use has been established, which notices are to be mailed to the last known address of such owners at least ten (10) days before the date of the hearing." ic Attachments: 1. Location map 2. Property line/zoning map 3. Resolution K IERV A 1 - AV L'--- ERVAIS AV E. + 4 ANDVIEW IK I 0 R. ASTLE AV SNERREN AVE R E79E N AVE OPE AVE. COPE AVE. LARK AVE. LARK AVE. I..: LARK AVE. 4 J h t h Z T p L LAURIE RD. Z LAURIE RD x iAN ° 25 ® AvE. 65 N W Z J •, 54 z -' f 2 JUNCTION AVE . L- -- --_ > ac AVE. > tl 8U KE A YE.U RKE ti ELDRIDG _j AVE. • NZPYW8OD W PUBLIC WORKS R pN W ,ELMON T or AVE. W fi4 > SLDG. I a ~V. u SKILLMA M o AVE. = NA RIS Sip H R v ~ 1 W t Nos WOOD AVE. t a 0 29 h M r N h 4280 FROST u AVE 7+ 5 ON AVE. W 4 41A , Q d) Su R Al L-21 W I FRISSIE AVE 5 0 2 s RtPLEY AV Wakefield Cr. o PN IA J - E W ' z < =0 29 h FIM 0 AVE z _ Lok e = j SOP a'`- w z z J PRICE zAVE W t .J z PRI E A J GJv > ` Ac W LAJ P NT AV 30 ., 65ST. PAUL LOCATION MAP 4 Attachment 1 N Co t +, ° zI 4 0 1 v' 1 0 a Ln qj JA r i J L L . 1 .,: z• 295 r. IR Ll 1 Z t p • r N - 29 L 'A O R c t1 t O t C s , Q 0 — w4 ' 2.°b 5 - 15 AV r Z4 c zg 5 .l 4 Zg S. - 1 c Z o ot 1p, 5 - *Aftl— — 2L ; fo PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 5 Attachment 2 l I i i 1 1 1 1 1 t t t 1. i t 1 1 i t l l t I t 1 i i i q o or 1 Ilk f 1 Sia.. 5 l •i•: 2 !fi ; ? y :' , : 418 S •.fir: `. _ UT _ •. M. . i . . : •• : • ..:: . Z 1Jl 42 • 18051? 4 gam, 4° 4 2 T I 1t• p pp L.. c 8e- zzo J v W cc Co U Z.3 0 1p, 5 - *Aftl— — 2L ; fo PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 5 Attachment 2 l I i i 1 1 1 1 1 t t t 1. i t 1 1 i t l l t I t 1 i i i q Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council Chambers in said City on the day of 1983 at 7:00 p.m. The following members were present: The fol l owing members were absent: WHEREAS, Dorothy Hej ny of Hej ny Rental ini a conditional use permit to operate an equipment rental business in a neighborhood zoned for residential use. property: •- Lots 11 and 12, Block 1, Garden Acres This property is also known as 1829 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by Dorothy He jny, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was approved by the Maplewood City Council on October 5, 1961. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on July 24, 1980, and renewed the conditional use permit for three years subject to the following conditions: a. Dedication of 10.5 feet of additional right -of -way to accommodate the future expansion of White Bear Avenue. b. All vehicles and equipment shall be parked so as to maintain a 15 foot setback from the White Bear Avenue right -of -way. c. Within three months of renewal, an acceptable site plan shall have been submitted to the Community Design Review Board for lots 11 and 12, block 1, Garden Acres. The site plan shall be consistent with City site design requirements, commonly required by similar business e.g. a paved driveway and parking lot, curbing, landscaping , .and screening. All permanent improvements are to be completed within three years of the date of this renewal Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were ' g i.ven an opportun to be heard and present written Z.statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and Planning Commission. Attachment 3 6 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above described conditional use permit be renewed on the basis of the following findings of fact: The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the1y purpose and standards of this chapter. ; 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the Z.public health, safety or general welfare. T d be located, des maintained and operated to be compatible3. The. use woul 9 With the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, el ectri cal interference and other nuisances. t 6. The use would 9 enerate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use woul d ' be served by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, u t i l i t i e s , schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for P ubl is facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 90 The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. i nal permit and use were effective prior to the adoption of the 11. The org p . existing code. 1:2.. There have bee no complaints received by the Department of Community Development concerning this business. Adopted this day of 1983 Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD d s being the du qualifiedied and appointed Cllerk of the City of I, the undersgne 9 y q attached Ha p l ewo od Minnesota do hereby certify that I have careful compared the of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, on the d d and foregoing extr a ct re g of 9 1983, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same 7 relates to a conditional use permit. Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of 1983 . City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota W I 8 S , MEMORANDUM I TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Plan Review Procedure DATE: September 29, 1983 z - Action by Council Endorse Modif i ed,_.,„_____ ReJ ecte Date Request The City Council, on September 12, requested an evaluation of the procedure for reviewing new construction plans. Reason for the Request Several members of the Council felt that the Council should review new construction plans because: 1. They were not as- informed as they would like to be on new construction. 2. The Council should take responsibility for new development. Current Procedure 1. All new construction, except single dwellings and minor construction, must be approved by the Community Design Review Board (CRRB). The Board's decision is subject to appeal to the City Council by the appl i cant, ci ty staff or any affected person within ten days after the Board's decision. 24 The CDRB meets on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each month. Developers who get an application in at least two weeks before a meeting are put on that agenda. Alternatives to the Current Procedure I . Council review of plans after consideration by the Community Design Review Board (CDRB). Advantage: Council would be aware of new development and could take ' responsi bi 1 i ty for approving plans. Disadvantages: 1. At least two weeks would be added to the review time. Council gave the plan review authority to the CDRB in 1979 because of complaints from contractors .that the review process was taking too long. 2. Longer Council meetings or another meeting may have to be added. The board averages about five cases each month. II. Abolish the Community Design Review Board and have the Council review all plans. (This alternative was considered by Council last year and rejected.) B. Number of cases appealed to the City Council: 1. McDonald's Restaurant -- Century and Minnehaha Avenues,(1980 2. Carlton Racquetball Club -- Carlton Street between Minnehaha Avenue and Conway Avenue (1980) = _ 3. Maplewood East Shopping Center--White Bear Avenue. north of Beam Avenue 1981) 4. County Road B and VanDyke Street apartments (1983) Other Cities - 1982 'Su CITY PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL OTHER Little Canada X X White Bear Lake X X Oakdale X X Woodbury X X New Brighton X X Blaine *Advisory Review Committee (Staff) Coon Rapids X X ** Brooklyn Center X X Roseville *Staff North St. Paul X X *Staff Above are the results of a survey Staff .conducted of 10 neighboring suburban communities to see how site and building plan reviews were handled in those cities. In all cases, the Planning Office is the first step in the review process. If a. variance, special use permit, or zone change is being applied for as well, the Planning Commission and City Council will do the plan review. Only if Planning Commission action is appealed. 4_ Action by Council ORDINANCE NO. Endorsed ------ --- - Modif i ed ......-- .. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2 - 23 Date _ OF THE MAPLEWOOD CODE - + THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The section 2 -23 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances is hereby amended to read as follows: Pursuant to Section 415.11 of Minnesota Statutes, the salary of the mayor is hereby established as 350v99-per-FRenth, $375. per month , and the salary of each member of the council is established at $275. -89- peg- eptb, $300_00 per month effective January 1, 1984 to December 31, 1984; and thereafter, the mayor's salary is established at $400.00 per month and the salary of each council member is established at $325.00 per month effective January 1, 1985 to December 31, 19850 This ordinance shall take effect to be in force from and after its passage and publication, as provided by law. Mayor Passed by the City Council of the City of Maplewood this day of , 1983. ATTEST. 2. City Clerk AYES: NAYS: 1 MEMORANDUM . TO: City Manager . FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Tour DATE: September 23, 1983 The City Council would like to tour the "Redwoods of Willow Creek" in Shoreview with the Planning Commission. Council asked the Planning Commission for a time convenient for them. The project is open Monday through Thursday until 8:00 p.m. I would recommend a Thursday after work, perhaps October 270 jw enclosure: magazine article T w r 1 t T S 1 9 homes bought in 90 days—little lots'and lots of homes! I The Redwoods of Willow Creek has every developer in the Twin Cities salivating. And for -good reason. This - single - family de- tached housing project in Shore - view- has sold 90 homes in 90 days. Prices start at $73.900. We literally sold a house a day in March; April, and May," ex- plained Dave Rotter, vice presi- dent of The Rottlund Company, Inc. We had originally projected selling out Phase I (a 91 -lot devel- opment) by the spring of 1984. But we're almost nine months ahead of schedule." In addition to potential home buyers, .Rotter frequently finds other builders browsing through The Redwoods. Some are taking notes, some are talking into tape recorders, some are doing crowd counts —all are a little curious, a little envious, and more than a little busy wondering how they can duplicate this incredibly success- ful development. OF Rotter has no doubts that their zero -lot- line" method of land use will be copied elsewhere in the metropolitan area in years to come, but that doesn't bother him. Phase II of The Redwoods is under development —an 87 -lot project not too far from Phase 1. t 1 -A: And a Phase III is already being discussed. This is going to be the most popular housing style around," Rotter proclaimed. He may be right. According to Roy Lund, presi- dent of Rottlund, zero-lot -line building originated in California. It basically means building a house near, or actually on, the border of the lot line. Adjacent houses are similarly situated, and the overall result is maximum use of the property for a minimum amount of money from the home buyer. All of the homes are set as close to one side of the lot line as zoning ordinances permit. and the remaining strip of land between your house and the lot line is used by your next door neighbor as part of their private courtyard— through a series of easements granted from one homeowner to another," ex- plained Lund. In this way, each home has privacy in the use of all of the yard up to the completely windowless sidewall of the adjacent home," he added. "The savings in the cost of dc Pi r ISO- tip 1 Financi Director Pir. of Parks & Pec . Dir. of Pub. Safetr Dir. of Pub. Works lire Marshall If -.00 1 1 Au usi S A 5 the land AM ounts - to about '35Mb percent, which is used to give thebuyerabettErehous g e The homes at The Redwoods there are four styles) range in sizefrom938sq. ft. to 1,338 sq. ft., and in cost from $ 73,900 to 581,900, The lot sizes are somewhat smaller than average suburban lots -55 ft. by 110 ft. The atmosphere of the development is similar to an ex- pensive townhouse project, but With one major difference. These are all single - family, detached houses. There are no association fees or common wails. As the name implies, all of the homes are redwood sided and fenced. Each house has a private courtyard areaand a sodded, professionally landscaped yard. The interiors include vaulted ceil- ings, oak trim, marble counter tops, ceramic tile floors, and, in mane of the floor plans. a balconied living room or kitchen. The Redwoods of Willow Creek is entered in this vear's Parade of Homes. It's one stop you shouldn'tm Tam 9esto ver sue, - -' - • - ,'• e _;' ~ C __ . .ter, . s UJ io 4 f « Prom: Dir -of Coa. Develop. Ref erred to : Village pillage ,1.erY:_ y: I;.' " ` . aK..'1" `..._ `S.e.ts y . _, . . _ _. at.. - '--- - - - r A_ 7 September 9, 1983 MEMORANDUM Action by Co Endorsed..., To:City Manager Barry Evans - Modifi e d From: Chi of of Pol i ce Kenneth V. Col l i ns Red ecteci.,............,. Subject: Wednesday Evening Court Sessions Date The Maplewood Clerk of Court's office has requested the discontinuation of Wednesday eveni ng . court. There are two reasons for this request. The first reason is that the number of requests and assignments of defendants for night court has diminished from over 100 cases to an average of less than 20 cases per Wednesday night. The second reason for their request is that Maplewood is the only city that continues to hold night court. This has been reviewed with my staff, and it would be our recommendation that rather than discontinue Wednesday night court altogether, it should be reduced to two nights a month, preferably the second and fourth Wednesday nights. This is being submitted for possible Council action. KV C : j s cc Court File RAMSEY COUNTY 0MUNICIPALCOURT Ilk ,• DIVISION 6 ; . _ r• 1380 Frost Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 ` /* 612) 777 -9111 fY C MARJORI E M. SUGGS — Senior Clerk September 1, 1983 Chief Ken Collins Maplewood Police Department 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Chief Collins: The following were the number of cases set for Wednesday night court for the months of June, July and August, 1983, June Ist -17 cases June 8th -No court June 15th -24 cases June 22nd -No court June 29th -33 cases July 6th -12 cases July 13th -No court July 20th -15 cases July 27th -10 cases August 3rd -No court August 10th -15 cases August 17th -17 cases August 24th -17 cases August 31st -13 cases If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely., J Kathy Smail Clerk of Court cc: file