Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983 06-27 City Council Packet7 1 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P . M. , Monday, May 23, 1983 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 83 -12 A. CALL To ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7:03 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember ..Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present MaryLee Maida, Councilmember Present C. ---APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes No. 83 -06 March 14, 1983 Councilmember Juker moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 83 -06 (March 14, 1983) as corrected. Seconded 'by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 2. Minutes No. 38 -08 April 11, 1983. Councilmember Juker moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 83 -08 (April 11, 198 3) as corrected. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all . D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved t_o _appr the Agenda as amended: 1. H.R.A. 2. Walter and Fenton 3. Street Code 4. McKnight, Burns, Hudson Place - Lights 50 Bike Ordinance Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. E . CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Anderson moved, seconded by Councilmember Juker, Ayes all, to approve the Consent Agenda Items 1 through 5 as recommended: 1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part I, Check Register dated May 11, 1983 and May 12, 1983 337,495.66; Part II Payroll - pay period ending April 29, 1983 - $54,718.54) 1 - 5/23 Id in the amount of $392,214.20. 2. Home Occupation: 2125 White Bear Avenue Approved the renewal of the home occupation for a beauty shop at 2125 White Bear Avenue subject to the following conditions: i 1. The permit shall be by the city council in five years, 2. The applicant shall keep the existing fire extinguisher in the salon area. 3. On- street parking by customers shall be discouraged. 4. No expansion of the permit in any way shall occur without the approval of the city council, 5. Operation. be limited to two chairs. 6. The applicant shall obtain an annual home occupation license from the City Clerk. 3. Final Plat - Gonzalez Addition Approved the Gonzalez Addition final plat consisting of 5 single dwelling lots at the southeast corner of County Road C and Keller Parkway, subject to the corners of each lot being monumented by land survey prior to issuance of any building permits. 4. Joint Use Rental Agreement Approved the Joint Use Agreement No. 150 between the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission and Maplewood for a 5 year period from January 1, 1983 to December 31, 1987. 5. Conditional Use Permit Renewal - St. Johns Approved the renewal of the conditional use permit for a 290 bed hospital and related medical facilities for Health Resources Center Inc /St . John's, subject to review by Council in five years. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Plan Amendment: White Bear Avenue, South of County Road B - 7:00 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding an amendment to the Land Use Plan from RM (residential medium density) and LSC (Limited Service Commercial) to BW (Business Warehouse) for the east side of White Bear Avenue south of County Road B. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Commissioner Lorraine Fischer presented the fol 1 owi n g 9Piannin Commission recommendation: Commissioner Hejny moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the resolution revising the land use plan to comply with the present zoning of the property, such as SC. Commissioner Prew seconded. 7 - r, /0I I The Commission discussed what land use category would be most compatible with b the zoning. Voting on the motion: Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Fischer, Hejny, Si gmundi k, Sletten. Ayes - Commissioner Prew." d. Mr. Richard Pearson, 1959 White Bear Avenue, owner of the property, stated he would like the BC zoning to remain and that the Land Use Plan be amended to conform. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Councilmember Bastian moved to continue the item until the June 13, 1983 meeting for further review. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 2. Rezoning: White Bear Avenue, South of County Road B 7:00 P.M. a. Councilmember Bastian moved to table Item F -2 until the June 13, 1983 meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 3. Conditional Use Permit: 1564 Grandview 7:15 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding approval of a conditional use permit to operate a tool sharpening service as a home occupation at 1564 E. Grandview Avenue. The applicant is David S. Suby. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Commissioner Lorraine Fischer presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: Commissioner Sletten moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of the resolution, authorizing David Suby to operate a tool sharpening service as a home occupation 1564 Grandview, subject to obtaining a license each January. Commissioner Barrett seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Fischer, Hejny, Prew, Sigmundik, Sletten." d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Mayor Greavu i ntroduced - the following resolution and moved its adoption: 83 -5 77 WHEREAS, David Suby requested a conditional use permit to operate a tool sharpening business as a home occupation at the following described property: 3 5/23 Lot 5, Block 2, Kroi ss Addition, Section 10, Township 29, Range 22 This property is also known as 1564 Grandview Avenue, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use perhi t is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit request was initiated by David Suby, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances, 2. This conditional use permit request was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on April 18, 1983. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said request be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on May 23, 1983, to consider this conditional use permit request. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be-heard and present written statements. The Counci 1 also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following find- ings of fact: 1. The proposal would be consistent with all of the requirements for authorization of a home occupation. 2. The use would be consistent with all applicable requirements for issuance of a conditional use permit. 3. Approval is subject to obtaining a license each January. Seconded by Counci lmernber Juker. Ayes - all. Go AWARD OF BIDS 1. Pick Up Trucks a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and roved its adoption: 83 -5 -78 BE IT RESOLVED' BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Merit Chevrolet in the amount of $24,866.22 is the lowest responsible bid for the furnishing of three (3) half ton pick -up trucks, and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby. authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Seconded by Counci 1 member Mai da. Ayes - all, 2. Frost Avenue Reconstruction (Concurrence) a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 4 - x/91 83 -5 -79 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has entered into an agreement with Ramsey County for the reconstruction of Frost Avenue from Birmingham.. Street to White Bear Avenue,Project No.82 -9, S.A.P. 62- 628 -03; and WHEREAS, the County will perform the engineering and administrative manage- ment of the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, that the bid of Forest Lake Contracting, Inc, in the amount of $847,188.86 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of Project 82- 9- S.A.P. 62- 628 -03 and the City of Maplewood concurs with Ramsey County's of bid. Seconded by Counci 1 member Bastian. Ayes - all, F. PUBIC HEARINGS (continued) 4. Rezoning: Sherren, Barclay and Cope Avenue a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding rezoning the lots abutting Sherren Avenue and Barclay Street and the north side of Cope Avenue from BC (Business - Commercial) to P, -1 (Single Dwelling). b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Commissioner Fischer presented the following. Planning Commission recommendation: Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the resolutions rezoning the lots abutting Sherren Avenue, Barclay Street and the north side of Cope Avenue to R -1, except for a rezoning to F for 2291 Hazelwood Avenue.. Commissioner Barrett seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Fischer, Hejny, Prew, Sigmundik, Sletten." d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were. heard . e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Counci 1 member Juker introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption WHEREAS, the City Council initiated a rezoning from BC, business commercial to R -1, residence district (single dwelling ) for an area bounded by the center - line of Highway 36, Cope Avenue, Hazelwood avenue and Sherren Avenue, the east line of lots one and 20, block two, Moritz Addition and the east line of the east 39 acres of the north half of the southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 29, Range 22. This area includes the following parcels: 1. Unpl atted land, subject to streets, described as the west 137 feet of the south 150 feet of the east 39 acres of the north half of the south- west quarter of Section 10, Township 29, Range 22. 5 - 5/23 2. Unpl atted land described as the west 137 feet of the north 90 feet of the south 330 feet of the east 39 acres of the north half of the south- west quarter of Section 10, Township 29, Range 22. 3. Unplatted land described as the west 137 feet of the nerth 90 feet of the south 240 feet of the east 39 acres of the north half of the east 39 acres of the nort oral f of the southwest quarter of tSecti on 10, Town- ship 29, Range 220 4. Blocks one and two, Moritz Addition. WHEREAS, the procedural history of the rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the Maplewood City Council, pursuant to Chapter 36, article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood 'Planning Commission on April 18, 1983. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on May 23, 1983, to consider this rezoning.. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT.RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance and Comprehensive Plan, 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare,,- Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. Counci 1 member Juker introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 83 - 5 - 81 WHEREAS, the City Council initiated a rezoning from BC, business commercial to R-1. residential district (single d w e l l i n g ) for an area bounded by the center- lines of Sherren Avenue, Hazelwood Avenue and Cope Avenue, and the east line of lots one and 20, block two, Moritz Addition . This area includes the f o l l o w i n g parcel: An unpl acted parcel described as the south 280 feet of the east 288 feet of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter (subject to roads) . in Section 10, Township 29, Range 22- commonly known as 2291 Hazelwood Avenue. A - r / 112 WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City Council, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Mapl dwood Code of Ordinances. t 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on April 18, .1983. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on May 23, 1983 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to 1 aw. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and Planning Commission, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson.Ayes - all. . H.. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Ordinance to Abolish Insurance Committee (2nd Reading) a. Manager Evans presneted the staff report. b, Mayor Greavu introduced the foil owi ng ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE N0, 540 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTION F OF THE MAPLEWOOD CODE RELATING TO THE INSURANCE COMMITTEE THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 . This ordinance does hereby repeal Sections 2 -96 through 2 -101 of the Maplewood Code. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage and publication* Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS ( continued) 7 - 5/23 5. Rezoning: 2300 -10 Hazelwood Avenue a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the rezoning of 2300 and 2310 Hazelwood Avenue from BC (Business-Commercial) to BC (M) ( Bus - iness Commercial Modified).t b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Commissioner Lorraine Fischer presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: Commissioner Lorraine Fischer presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the resolution .rezoning 2300 and 2310 Hazelwood Avenue from BC to BC(M). Commissioner Barrett seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Fischer, Barrett, Sigmundik. Nays - Commissioners Axdahl, Prew, Sletten, Hejny. a Motion fails.. Commissioner Prew moved the Planning Commission recommend the City leave the zoning on this property as is, BC. Commissioner S1 etten seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl , Prew, S1 etten Hejny. . Nays - Commi ssi oners Fi scher, Barrett,. Sigmundik." d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following heard: Mr. Philip James, 2300 Hazelwood Avenue. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. 9 Councilmember Anderson moved that the rezoning of 2300 and 2310 Hazelwood Avenue from BC to BCM to dens -e . Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - Mayor-Greavu, Councilmembers Bastian, Juker and Mai da. Nays - Councilmember Juker. UNFINISHED BUSINESS ( continued) 3. Code Amendment: Metal Buildings (2nd Reading) a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: C /n7 a ORDINANCE N0, 541 AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGULATING THE REVIEW OF METAL POLE BUILDINGS The City Council of the City of Maplewood does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Section 202.240 of the Maplewood Code is hereby added to read as follows: t 202.240 SPECIAL AREAS 1. It shall be unlawful to erect a metal building in the City of Maplewood which is of a design commonly referred to as a "metal pole building ", "pole barn" or "agri -building", unless such building would be located in a F. Farm Residence District or unless such building is a metal storage building commonly used as a back yard storage shed. Should any dispute arise over the classification of a proposed metal building, the Director of Community Development shall determine whether the proposed metal building fits into the "metal pole building" category. Appeals of the Director's decision shall be made to the City Council for a determination of building type. 2. Buildings having metal exteriors, but not being of the typical pole building design, may only be allowed in areas zoned F. Farm Residence, BC, Business Commercial, M -1, Light Manufacturing and M -2, Heavy manufacturing. Special architectural design and nonmetal decorative modifications may be required to assure compatibility with community development. 3. The City Council may hear requests for variances from the literal provisions of this ordinance in instances where its strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and to grant such variances only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Undue hardship" is used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable-use if used under the conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner and variance from the ordinance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force after its passage and publication. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS ( continued) 6. Rezoning: Cope, Highway 36 and German Street a.' Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the rezoning of the -property on the north side of Cope Avenue from German Street and Castle Avenue from B -C . (Business Commercial) to R -1 (single dwelling), b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Mayor Greavu moved to table the proposed rezoning of the property on Cope Avenue until such time as a Plan men ment is consi ere . Seconded by Counci 1 member Mai da. Ayes - all. 9 - 5/23 H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (continued) 2, PUD Amendment: Maryland and Ferndale a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mr. Ken Gervais, Castle Design, stated Mr.Oman, who spoke against the proposal at the last meeting, called and stated he is no - longer opposed to the PUD amendment. c. Councilmember Bastian moved to approve the PUD amendment with a change in condition No. T. Motion failed for lack of a second, d. Counci 1 member Mai da introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: i i I WHEREAS, Castle Design and Development Co., Inc. initiated proceedings before the City Council to amend the special use permit for a planned unit developmentPUD) covering the following- described property: That part of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 lying southeasterly of a l i n e from the northeast corner of said NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 to a point on the west l i n e of said NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 and 450 feet south of the original C. St. P.M. & 0. Ry. right of way; also the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4; all in Section 24, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, subject to *Maryland Avenue; said property being located generally north of Maryland Avenue and west of Fern - dal e Street, WHEREAS, the procedural history of this PUD amendment is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit amendment was initiated by Castle Design and Development Company, Inc. pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on May 2, 1983. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said permit be denied. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on May 9, 1983 to consider his PUD amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opporutni ty to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that condition one of the 1973 PU D be revised as follows 1. The site plan approved in 1973 shall be revised to resite the 110 units from along the northerly boundary of the PUD to the north side of Maryland l 27, 1983 shall be the specific development y Avenue. The plan dated April plan north of Maryland Avenue, subject to design review baord approval. Any changes that result in an increase in density or change in building type or site plan shall require a public hearing and approval b the CityP, y y Council, Approval of the plan north of Maryland Avenue is subject to the following conditions: 10. - ; 1911 a. The two existing parcels shall be combined into one parcel. b. All common areas shall be maintained by a homeowners' association. The city attorney must approve all rules and by.l aws . Any changes affecting the common areas shall require prior city council approval.. E t c. The City Council must order a feasibility study for the grater main on McKnight Road and the elevated storage prior to construction of r phases three and four of the proposal. d. The City Council must order a public improvement for the pondi ng and storm water outlet system to Beaver. Lake prior to constructi of phases three and four of this proposal. e. Dedication of 33 feet of right -of -way for Maryland Avenue. f. Grading on the north part of the property 'shall not affect the city property called "Jim's Prairie." g. The developer shall make available to the City an area suitable for a neighborhood park as indicated in the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan. Location and size to be agreed upon by the developer and the Director of Community Services. If purchase is necessary, the City will follow its procedures for establishing the value of the land. Any costs of appraisals or other expenses shall be paid by the developer. Approval is based on the following findings of fact: l . Storm water drainage and pondi ng .together with city water and sanitary sewer facilities providing for the public health, safety and welfare are adequately addressed by the above conditions. 2. Maryl ake Road is not required to be constructed as a result of the revised PUD resulting in a financial benefit to the City. 3. While there may be an increase in local traffic over the 1977 plan, the overall impact on the neighborhood will be less, since Maryland Avenue and Ferndale Street have been put through since 1977. This allows a better dispersion of .traffic. 4. Maryland Avenue and Ferndale Street are designed to adequately handle this local traffic. They are designated as major and minor collectors, respectively, on the city's land use plan.. 5. There are only two more units proposed than were approved in the 1973 PUD and only sixteen more than the 1977 plan. Significant areas of open space will be retained for environmental protection and aesthetics. This would be an improvement over the 1977 plan in that no grading would be required for a golf course. 6. The change proposed to the PUD through the amended special use permit enhance and promote the public's health, safety and welfare. 11 - 5°23 7. An environmental assessment worksheet is not necessary, based upon comparing the number and type of units, overall density, sizes and locations of struct- ures, impervious surface areas, traffic, utilities, drainage, roads and surrounding development. The City Council finds that the d j fferences are not significant between the current and 1977 projects that affect the environ- ment. 8. Unstable, peaty soils are prevalent across the midsection of the property making access and utility service difficult to the northern area. 90 The current proposal is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The proposed density would be less than allowed by the plan. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - Mayor Greavu; Councilmembers Anderson, Juker and Maida. Nays - Councilmember Bastian. 4. Variance: 2483 Highway 61 (Al Zuercher) a. Manager Evans stated this item had been tabled until the ordinance on Metal Buildings was approved. The ordinance was approved for second reading at tonight's meeting. b. The following Community Design Review Board recommendation was given: Board Member Fol l ey moved the Board recommend to the City-Council approval of a variance for the construction of a metal pole building at Zuercher Well Drilling, 2483 Highway 61, based on the findings that: 1.. The variance would meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance since the proposed building would be concealed behind the existing buildings and not in view from the highway. 2, The proposed building would be compatible with the area and would not impact adjacent development. Board Member Hedlund seconded. Ayes - all." c. Mr. Andy Zuercher, 2483 Highway 61, spoke on behalf of the request. d. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 83 -5 -83 WHEREAS, Zuercher Well Drilling initiated a variance request to erect a metal pole building in a M -1, Light Manufacturing District for the following described property: Lot 3, except STH 61 -1 and except the north 85 feet of Lot 3, W.H. Howards Garden Lots. This property is also known as 2483 Highway 61, P-lapl ewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance request is as follows: 1 . This variance request was initiated by Zuercher 1 l D r i l l i n g , pursuant to chapter 25, article III of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2, This variance request was reviewed by the Maplewood Community Design Review Board on March 22, 1983. The Board recommended to the City Council that said variance request be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on May 23, 1983 to consider this variance request. Notice thereof was published and mauled pursuant to law. All P ersons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also iconsidered reports and recommendations of the City staff and the Board. N0' THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE described q approved MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above bed variance request be ao roved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The variance would meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance since the proposed building would be concealed behind the existing buildings and no in view from the highway. proposed 9 compatible2.The ro osed buildin would be with the area and would not impactP adjacent development. Seconded by Counci lmember Maida. Ayes - all* 5. National Fire Code (Second Reading) a. Manager Evans presented the staff report . b. Counci 1 member Bastian introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 542 AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT CONCERNING ADOPTION OF NATIONAL FIRE CODES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MPALEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 12 -51 fo the Maplewood Code of Ordinances hereby amended to read as follows: There is hereby adopted by the Ci for the purpose of prescribing regulations governing Conditions hazardous to l i f e and. property from fire or explosion, all of chose certain code , standards , ramended racti ces and manuals contained in and set out in Volumes 1 through 16, inclusive, of the National Fire Codes published in 1983 by the National Fire Protection. Association, and the provisions of same are hereby incorporated herein and made a part of this articlencoro by refer-y P + -. + this article. ence as compl a gel y and to the sane extent as i f se ou at length i n Code 1965 1703.010; Ord No. 265 X1 4 -2 -70, Ord. No, 327, §1, 7- 20 -72, Ord . No. 410, 51, 1-27-77) Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its P assage and publication, as provided by law. Seconded by Council member Mai da. Ayes - all. 6. Budget Change: Water shed Assessment a. Manager Evans proposed that a $34, 310 budget transfer fr the contingency 13 - 5/23 account be approved to finance the 1983 installment on the special assessments levied by the Ramsey -Washington Metro Watershed District for the Battle Creek improvements. b. Mayor Greavu roved to authorize a $34,310 budge* transfer from the coati n- gency account be approve to finance t e nsta meats on a specsa assess - menTs Tor the at Creek improvements. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - F. PUBLIC HEARINGS ( continued) 7 Preliminary Plat: Bennington Woods - 8:00 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding preliminary plat approval for Bennington Woods located on Larpenteur Avenue West of Parkway Drive. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Mr. Dave Briggs, Vice President of Woodmark, Inc., answered questions asked by the Council. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard.. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Juker moved to approve the Bennington Woods Preliminary Plat subject to the following con i ti ons 1. City Y PPattornapproval of the declaration and bylaws for the condominium. These documents shall include langauage which: a. W i l l guarantee that only one homeowners' association will be responsible for the maintenance of the driveways and other common areas. b. Will reaui re City Council approval of any changes to the bylaws or de- c (arati on which 'effect the maintenance of the common areas or driveways . 2. Lots nine through twelve shall *be designated as "unbui l dabl a parcels" in the declaration for the condominium homeowners' association document and deeds for the individual properties. 3. The final plat shall contain utility easements,.as directed by the City Engineer. 4. The developer shall be responsible for the drainage, erosion control, site grading and landscaping of the lots remaining under his control. If lots are not developed and not transferred to the home owners association, the developer shall prepare plans and submit them to the City Engineer for approval. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. . Ayes - all. 8. Vari Dieter Street Moe 8:15 P.M. 14 - 5/23 A a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding approval of lot area, lot frontage and lot width variance to construct a single dwelling on an existing forty foot wide interior lot, 5000 square feet in area f or Lot. 21, Block 31, Gladstone Plat 2 as requested by Mr. Harlan Moe and Mr. Gordon Hedlund. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: Commissioner Pellish moved the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the resolution denying the requested lot area, width and area variances on the basis: 1. Development of this lot would be inconsistent with the intent of the zoning code, resulting in a dwelling out -of - character with existing neighborhood development. 2. Approval would be inconsistent with the previous denials of similar requests. 3. Neighborhood density would further exceed the allowable maximum. 4. Strict enforcement would not cause an undue hardship unique to the individual lot in question. 5. The present owner purchased this tax- forfeited property in 1982. The require- ments from which a variance is required have been in effect since the 1960's. Any hardship incurred would be self imposed. Commissioner Whitcomb seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl , Barrett, El l efson, Fischer, Hejny, Pel l i sh, Prew, Si gmundi k, Whitcomb." d. Mr. Gordon Hedlund, owner of the property, spoke on behalf of the proposal. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents . The following were heard: Occupant from 1950 Dieter Street. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Council member Juker. introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 83-5 -84 WHEREAS, a lot area, width and frontage variance request has been initiated by Harlan Moe to construct a single dwelling on a 40 x 125 foot lot described as follows: Lot 21, Block 31, Gladstone Plat 2, Section 15, Township 29, Range 22 WHEREAS, the procedural hi story of this variance request is as follows: 1. That a variance request has been initiated by*Harlan Moe, pursuant to Chapters 30 and 36 of the Maplewood Code and Section 462.357(8) of State Statute; 1 C - C X70 2. That said variance request was referred to and reviewed by the Maplewood City Planning Commission on the day of 1983, at which time said Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said var- iance be denied; 30' That the Maplewood City Council held a public hearing to consider the variance request, notice thereof having been published kand mailed pursuant to law; and 4. That all persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and /or present written statements, and the Council considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA that the above described variance be denied on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1 . Development of this lot would be inconsistent with the intent of the zoning code, resulting in a dwelling out of character with existing neighborhood debe'lopment. 2. Approval would be inconsistent with the previous denials of similar requests. 3. Neighborhood density would further exceed the allowable maximum. 4. Strict enforcement would not cause an undue hardship unique to the in- dividual lot in question. 50 The present owner purchased this tax forfeited property in 1982. The requirements from which a variance is requi red have been in effect since the 1960's. Any hardship incurred would be self - imposed. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian, Juker and Maida. Nays - Mayor Greavu . Councilmember Bastian moved to table Item H -7 until the end of the Agenda. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Plan Amendment: 2075 Prosperity Road - Mo -Tech Corporation a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the resolution revising the Land Use Plan from RL, lower density residential to BW, business warehousing for 2075 Prosperity Road and amend the acreage chart on page 19 -3 of the Land Use Plan to reflect the change from RL to BW. Commissioner Whitcomb seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Ellefson, Fischer, Hejny, Pellish, Prew, Sigmundik, Whitcomb." Ir_ C. Mr. Richard Hessey, owner- of the P10 -Tech • plan ch Corporate on, stated he s i n favorofthepamendmenttoBusiness - Warehouse. d. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and movedadoption:_ i ts 83 -5 -85 WHEREAS, a proceedings for the amendment of the Maplewood ComprehensiveMunicipalentitled "Plan for Maplewood" has been initiated by City of MaplwoodforachangeUsefromRL, lower density residential t BiHesswarehousingforthefollever o W, bus - generally described area: Commencing at a oint 139.9 •P feet east of west linene and 151.6 feet souofnorthlineofl3thencesouth9 south at d 2.32 feet to beginning thence sou h-east n. 84 f and to linene 81 , 38 mn 25 sec. 120mi 38.38 feet thence ang right 12eettowestlineofroadthencesouthwester)y on said westerly125,58 feet to southeast corner lo 3 thence westerly on souther) saidlot1west139.9 fee42.5 feet of east line of y beginning et of said lot thence northtobeggto66feeteasement) all i •Garden Lots Section n lot 3, block 7, Sabinon15, Township 29, Range 22. WHEREAS, the procedure] history f the r •Y proposed amendment s as follows 1. The City of Maplewood has a Comprehensive •P ensi ve Muni ci pal Plan entitled "Planfor. Maplewood"adopted pursuant to the rovisions of 'p Minnesota Statutes,Chapter 670 Laws 1965 the Municipal Planning Act, Minnesotaa StatutesAnnotated, Sections 462.351 to 462.364 thereof); 2. Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.355 Subdiivis on 2 and 3 thereof, provideforamendmentoftheComprehensiveMunicipalPlan p thereof • p n or of any section 3. An , amendment of the rCom ehensi ve Municipal 'p Plan has been proposed btheCitofMaplewoodandreferredtotheMaplewoodewhichheldapublicpwoodPlanningCommission, Minnesota p is hearing on the 2nd day of May, 1983 pMinnesotaStatutes,. 462. -355 Y P ant to Subdi 2 thereof, notice b mail andpublicationhavingbeengiven, heard all Y who wished to be heard, con -sidered all written and staff reports and analysis, WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Planning •of those .y n9 Commission having considered the testi-mon Y ose present, all written submissions to it andapprovaloftheamendment, staff reports, recommended NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLdescribedplan EWOOD,CITY COUNCIL that the abovepamendmentbe .approved on the basis of the f •of fact: followingowing findings 1. The proposed change would not have a • Plan,any adverse effect on the Comprehensive 2. The proposed designation would be c •compatible with adjacent land uses. 30 The change recognizes 'existing use and zoni9gthattheexistin are comwiththesite. g patible Seconded by Councilmember Bastian Ayes - all. A 2. Code Amendment: A •ppendlx E - Sprinklers a, Manager Evans presented staff report. b, Parkside Fire ChiefWilliams Thor Bodsgard and Eamsansweredquestionsas st County Line Firs Chief DuaneaskedbytheCouncil. c, Councilmember Bastian t k an amendment moved first read i n of an 'ordinanceregardingAppenix _ g ordinance pertai ni ngriners, g to econded by Councilmember Juker,Ayes all. d, Councilmember Basti moved to suspend the Rulessecondreadingatthistime of Procedures and hear Seconded by Mayor Grea vu. Ayes - all, e. Councilmember Bastian 'introduced the following ordinanced Hance and moved i is a •dopti on: ORDINANCE N0, 543 Section 1, Section g-follows 22 of the Maplewood Cod 'ws e is hereby amended to read as AN ORDINANCE AMENDING h1APL SECTION NINE OF THEEWOODCODERELATINGTOSPRINKLERS THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 9 -22, Procedures and administration, As provided by the state •state build• to building code, the fol ' ng appendices of heingcodeareherebadlowity .opted by reference: Appendix A - -Fall Out SheltersAppendixB -- Variations in Snow_ loads1982UnifoBuildingCodeAppendixMinnePlumbingp Chapter 359CodeAppendix6StateBuildingCodeApOriinCAbbreviations and9 Addresses of Technical1982UniformBuildingCodeChapters ]2, 49StatePCode.-Appendix 5Plumbing S ' 70 .C. DStateBuildingCodeFlood Re _ _Appendix E-- Sprinkler Regulations —Section 201, 2 through 208.2s Proofi Section 2. This ordiiubli nance shall take effect and bpanon. e in force from and after Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes 18 - 5/23 K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. H.R.A. a. Counciimember t uker requested the CitheH. R.A. Commission a Y Manager contact the applicants forina and see that they have ppl g and invite them to attend a packet for the next. H. R•A. meet-s 2. Frost - Walter-Fenton a. Coun 'I cil member Anderson stated si nce the court has 'ruledWalterFentonandFr on •Frost, he would like to r the zoning oftoR - proceed with down zonizonin that property b • City Attorne - Patdaa y Kelly suggested Council dyappealpertiodsover. delay any acts on until the 30 3. Street Cod a. Councilmember Anderso requested that when a feasibi study is pre aredstreetadjoining,t the study include the p 9 cost of the suburban 4* McKnight, Burns, Hudson PlaCe - Lighgis a. Mayor Greavu sat ed Maplewood had request •nothing has been done. q ed stop lights at Burns •He instructed staff to s and McKnighttoMDOTDistrictgEngineerendastrongly •g eer reg1eStin g the lights be immediately, g Y written lettergplacedaced5 • Dike Ordinance a• Mayor Greavu instructedwillbeand the staff to prepare a bikeerstandabletothechild ordinance, one thatrep. . J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1 • Mr. Gayle Rehnber g a• Mr. Rehnberg stated he is representingOfBlock4, Gladstone h1r, and Mrs . BertoneAddition, the land t t Getsug, ownerszoning. He i s requesting that was down zoned fromqngreconsideration . A R- M-1 to R_23zoneisrequested.Mayor Greavu moved reconsider the moti b Gladstone Addition. made previous]y re arding g Bock Seconded by Councilm •ember Mai da.Ayes -Y Mayor-Greavu, Councilmem •ber Maida. Motion failed, Nays - Counci 1 member And •erson, Bas t1 anandJuker. H. UNFINISHED BUSINES S 7, Crestview Drive Wat 'ermain a. Manager Evans presented the staff report, 1 _ 5/23 F M, ADJOURNMENT 9:51 P.M. amity er l j -'.'1. .'.'.^3':?faiw..1F .dflt'':'ra1?St': X11' s' J4Y-.? apaVs3 .+Y1ltif =srfc: - 9 ] 1H03J7iwii !.iw:wRa.iwd' r.fav:.w=+ sa.:._ 1[ . IJ ti 11983 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER K 'CHECK 1k0. DATE AMOUN VENDCR ITEM DESCRIPTION 2 152100 06/15/83 203.00 BLUE CROSS INSURANCE a 1521 3'0 06/15/83 419.24 PLLE CROSS_INSURANCE -_- - bT13 7`7 ; -?'2• -6L ls - - CROSS I SUR A NC s 152100 06/15/83 55.43 BLLE CROSS INSURANCE 6 152100 06/15/83 33.26 ELt E CROSS INSURANC Z7fi57 T.BILE _ROS IWS3RANCE a 152100 06115183 376.53 BLLE CROSS INSURANCE 152100 06115183 110 oft 6 BLLE CROSS INSURANCE o 3iJD 7i7!133: 03 - - ' -CRCSS-IASURANC 152100 06//5183 173.42 BLUE CROSS INSURANCE 152100 06!15/83 16963 BLLE CROSS INSURANCE 13 u - b1T31 13 :$ --B.1:E - RCSS"INSURANCE 4 152100 .06115183 ::219,66 EttE CROSS INSURANCE s 152100 06/15/83 BLLE CROSS INSURANCE a b7- 1ST83 351,97 1 9 t CRASS INSURANCE Q 7 152100 06/15/831 191.94 BLLE CRCSS INSURANCE 8 152100 06/15/83 191e94 BLUE CROSS sl 13 7fi T83 3:s BLLE CROSS INSURANCE NSURANCE - 4 152100 06/15/83 55.43 BLLE CROSS INSURANCE 2 :; 152100 06/15/83 175.44 BLUE CROSS INSURANCE I22 ' 1152 1 D 6 T57 __240: - D -- -_8L l CROSS NSUR ANC E 23 -3, 617.29 0'26 27 152502 06/15/83 7 MINN STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC PBL ze 2 I1 Sf$ -x37:00 ____..MN - ST ATE TREASURER KCTOR VEH LIC 'BL 9 10, 91 152502 06/15/83 422.00 MN STATE TREASLRER DRIVERS LIC PSL 301, -1 , 9 83 3.2 5 31 32 # # #f ## 3a 1525413 D T 7$X79 : -MN iI - LIFE INS INSURANCE' 35 152540 06/15183 1 MUTU MN MUTUAL LIFE INS INSURANCE 3'6 152 540 06115183 316.86 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS INSURANCE 3 ; - 54u - 611 V6 - G N MUTUAC - L31•E NS i - _ INSURANCE 38 152540 06/15/83 129018 MN MUTUAL LIfE INS INSURANCE 31;1 1525 06115183 3.60 MN MU TU AL LIFE INS INSURANCE ao 5234'T 61157$3 -2 :1 . 6 MN MUTUAL LI INS INSURANCE 41 152540 06/15/83 129020 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS INSURANCE a2y 152540 06/15/83 10082 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS INSURANCE 43 "523-4- x-6 71 -5M-7 2 ____RN_. MUTUAL -LIFE INS INSURANCE 441 152541D D6/15183 _45.86 P.. MUTUAL LIFE INS INSURANCE r s 152540 06/15/83 45.85 MN MU TUAL FE INS__INSURANCE 461525 D6 - 1Wf83 3D7:2__ LI MN 'MU LIFE INS ^ - - --INSURANCE 47 152540 06/15/83 2, 417.D7 MN MUTUAL Ll FE INS INSURANCE 48 152540 06/15183 49 3" r U 7 3 179.43 715 1 1 b - MN MUTUAL LIFE MN __T4U TUAL - L I FE INS N S - -- INSURANCE INSURANCE so 1'52540 06115!83 s, 152540 06/15/83 341:40 12062 FN, "UTUAL LIFE MN _MUTUAL LIFE INS INS -- _ INSURANCE INSURANCE INSURi3~2STrbTlST$3 -403.94--- "______N MUTUAL LIFE iNS ANCC 52; s3+ 152540 06115183 266.76 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS INSURANCE 152540 06/15183 123.61 MAN MUTUAL LIFE INS INSURANCE F5234 lT5T8 371 - _ .MN MUTUAL 1.I1= EE .-- INS INSURANCE s6 152.540 06/15183 434.40 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS INSURANCE 15254 06/15153 8.858.28 14 R6 T A SCHIFSKY CONTRACT PYM 62.3335`. 152889 0 6/15 /R3 17. DAIRY GUE EN ADULT SPEC EVENTS 1' •'' 103.70152E35fl6I15 /R3 103.70 Zz - : r - -- - - -- - 120.20 r. ±NN Zoc ADU sP LC E VENTS z3` 152F36 06/15/F3 120.20 2 5 000.00 KRAUSE. ANDERSON REFUND t E 152F37 06/15/83 1 ' - - - - - - -- -- 15, 000.00 - 2 TNN STA TREASURER MOTOR YE _LI C QRL i3 4.51535T3 . - - - -- 06 / 15783 94.50 M- 1535112 06/15/83 192.00 MINN STATE TREASURER DRIVcRS LiC P 4 786.50 - - - - - - -- - 23 - - - - -- - - -- •. -- - - -. - - _....... _.. - - 34 35 itf t 3,724:49 MN ST ATE TREAS PERA PIRA PBL15355706/15/83 MR STATE TREAS PERA PERA 153557 06!'!5/83 4.282.93 18 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA P8L 153557 06/15/83 .__ -__ - -- MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL 0 b 15 / $ 3 4 1535 - 57 -----..53 5 - 5 - 7 --- - -- -29.96 rN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL 153557 06/15/83 r PBL 100.76 rN STATE TREAS PERA F 153557 ObI15 183 ERA PBL 5/83 173.39 MN STATE TREAS FERA P - RA BBL153557D6 /1 189.04 rN STATE TREAS PERA Pc 414 153557 06/15/83 38.19 rN STATE TREAS PERA FcRA PBL 45 153557 06/15/83 MN STATE TREAS PERA PIRA PBL 53.25 148 * 57 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL 47 153557 061151V3 364.51 MN STATE TREAS PERA . -- PERA PBL _557 0 6115183 -- _ _ -- F RA PERA 8 4 153 38923.75 MN STATE TREAS PE i 5 . _ r Q 373.53 MN STATE TREAS PERA LPRA BL X50 153557 06/15/83 s: 153557 06/15/83 261.34 M% STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL I83 __- - - - - -- - 209.27 MN STATE TR_aS PERA PERA P8 52 15355?`! 06/15 179.26 MN ST ATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL 5 153557 06 /15/83 129.58 - MN STATE TREAS PERA - PERa 8L06/15/83 PRA B 1535-57 • ---- - - - -- - 542.85 - -- MR STATE TREAS PER a I RA PB L54153557 5^ D 6113 /83 AS PERA PE5 .153557 06!15/3 3 329.74 MN STATE TRE f CMECK REGISTER 1 CITY983 OF MaFLEa00D VENDOR ITEM DESCRIP Ti O CMEC N0 .DA AMOUNT 1 zf 152540 06/15!83 56.35 MU MN MUTUAL MUTUAL LIFE LIFE INS INS IKSURANCE INSURANCE 3_- 330b /15/ _ _ -54.85 247.2?Mgt MUTUAL LIF E INS iNSUR,NCE4 152540 15254[1 6 /15 /83 3 FN MUTUAL L Fc INS I AS f 3 152540 06/15/83 0 12 3.60 IN MUTUAL LIFE INS _I tiSUR A,NC E 15254fl Ob/1 5 /83 131.98 ._-.._MN MUTUAL LIFE INS INSUR 752540 Sl$39611 11.46 rN M UTUAL LIFE INS IR AN LE a 152549 0 6 1 l5t83 445.88 PM PUTUAL LIFE IRS INSURANCEIN 9:152540 06/15.183 b3 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS INSURANCE 15254 06/15153 8.858.28 14 R6 T A SCHIFSKY CONTRACT PYM 62.3335`. 152889 0 6/15 /R3 17. DAIRY GUE EN ADULT SPEC EVENTS 1' •'' 103.70152E35fl6I15 /R3 103.70 Zz - : r - -- - - -- - 120.20 r. ±NN Zoc ADU sP LC E VENTS z3` 152F36 06/15/F3 120.20 2 5 000.00 KRAUSE. ANDERSON REFUND t E 152F37 06/15/83 1 ' - - - - - - -- -- 15, 000.00 - 2 TNN STA TREASURER MOTOR YE _LI C QRL i3 4.51535T3 . - - - -- 06 / 15783 94.50 M- 1535112 06/15/83 192.00 MINN STATE TREASURER DRIVcRS LiC P 4 786.50 - - - - - - -- - 23 - - - - -- - - -- •. -- - - -. - - _....... _.. - - 34 35 itf t 3,724:49 MN ST ATE TREAS PERA PIRA PBL15355706/15/83 MR STATE TREAS PERA PERA 153557 06!'!5/83 4.282.93 18 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA P8L 153557 06/15/83 .__ -__ - -- MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL 0 b 15 / $ 3 4 1535 - 57 -----..53 5 - 5 - 7 --- - -- -29.96 rN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL 153557 06/15/83 r PBL 100.76 rN STATE TREAS PERA F 153557 ObI15 183 ERA PBL 5/83 173.39 MN STATE TREAS FERA P - RA BBL153557D6 /1 189.04 rN STATE TREAS PERA Pc 414 153557 06/15/83 38.19 rN STATE TREAS PERA FcRA PBL 45 153557 06/15/83 MN STATE TREAS PERA PIRA PBL 53.25 148 * 57 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL 47 153557 061151V3 364.51 MN STATE TREAS PERA . -- PERA PBL _557 0 6115183 -- _ _ -- F RA PERA 8 4 153 38923.75 MN STATE TREAS PE i 5 . _ r Q 373.53 MN STATE TREAS PERA L PRA BL X50 153557 06/15/83 s: 153557 06/15/83 261.34 M% STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL I83 __- - - - - -- - 209.27 MN STATE TR_aS PERA PERA P8 52 15355?`! 06/15 179.26 MN ST ATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL 5 153557 06 /15/83 129.58 - MN STATE TREAS PERA - PERa 8L06/15/83 PRA B 1535-57 • ---- - - - -- - 542.85 - -- MR STATE TREAS PER a I RA PB L54153557 5^ D 6113 /83 AS PERA PE5 .153557 06!15/3 3 329.74 MN STATE TRE 11.x` 1983 CITY OF MAFLEUOOD CHECK REGISTER f1 CH We DATE AM7UN VENDOR. ITEM DESCRIPTiG` f 21 153557 06115/83 35.28 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL 153557 06/15/83 194.95 WN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL a` 285 *6$ MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA P8 r. 5 153557 06/15/83 80.16 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL b R STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL15355706/15/83 126.75 M x._.._153537 -__- -- b113183 _ -- - -- - -- -- 92.OR . - - -. - -- -- - - - - -_ MN STATE TREAS PERA PLRA P8L 153557 136115183 64.76 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL 91 153557 06!15!83 49058 PN STATE TREAS PERA PLPA PBL ic -- 153557__ —___. 06/15IS3 -- _ — -_ .___ _ - _65.9b PN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL 153557 06l15/R3 16.66 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL 153557 06/15/R3 379 *%kn FN STATE TREAS FERA PERA PBL 153'557 - -__ - - 0b115T83 - - -- - - - 1' 9.80 - - MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL 16* 634.88 * - f• 153742 06/15/83 87000 CLERK OF pISTFc CRT CnTr DRIVERS LI 22 154502 06/15183 3 P STATE TREASURER MCTGR VEH LIC 15 Ob/15/83 381.00 MN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC PPL 4 f tit t. 90.130 MRPA TRAVEL TRAINING j t29 154551 ° 06/15/83 - 90.00 31 33! 34!13 - - - 015%83_.._ - - -- 195.00 -. ---- -- NATL REGISTRY TRAVEL TRAINI I 195 *00 t 1 3Ei 157015 06/15/3 311970 AFSCME UNION DUES 157D13_ — _ - -- -06f15/P3" - - - - - -- 3 *32 - ARSC UNION DUES al 317.02 r 43: *444 *4 i 157 06/15/8 12„ 717.50 CTY ChTY EMPL CR UN CREDIT UN PBL 12 , 717.5 0 Xa7, r49 ' * t f * ! 50 157330 06/15/83 741.99 ICMA RETIREMENT DEF =RRED COMP s, 1 06!15/83 2 102.96 ICMA RETIREMENT DLF =RFcED C CMP 844.95 - I j 53 054 *!! s54 MAO ROSEMARY KANE P /R DEDUCT 157373 06/15/83 57 1983 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CH NCO* DATE AMOUNT VENCCR ITEM OESCRIP T; ON t 3 a' 157453 X36/15/83 149564.68 FAFLE $D S T BNK F67 PBL - 7__.574.53._.._1)611 -187.50 -- - __.hAFtE kD ST BNK SAVIN GS BNDS PBL e 149752.18 157 06/15/83 24.00 METRO SUP:.R V ASSN UNION DUES 24000 157502 06/15/83 3 MN STATE TREASUREP MCTOR VEH L:C PBL t ?:a!15750 06/15 314.00 MN STATE TREASURER ORIVEkS LIC F8 I -L--- - - - - -- ---------- --- - -- - - - - - -• -- _ - --4 , 24 8.15 23 157540 06/15/83 310.00 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS INSURANCE 24 310.0 y 27 I 1 - 5 - 5b - ._ -_ - --2. 157-5 06i13>83 -- - I . 300.00 MN STATE K DEfLR _o COME 300.002a i . z' 157562 06/15/83 640.00 MN TE AMSTERS 320 UNION DUES t ''q; X35 I 640.00 I3E t t f 157870 06/15/83 79998.59 Mai ST COMM REVENUE SuT PBL 79 998.59 I 42 15847 ____06115183 93,7 87.28 METRO WASTE CONTR SEWER SERVICE CH 93 !44, 1 i 145: 4e+ 158502 06115/R3 4 ,,978.75 MN STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC PB; 585D -_0- 6f15n3 _- _ _239.00 -_ ___MN STATE TREASURER DRIVcRS LIC PF3L 5 t 1 52 i 153 154, 1 06/58.23 NCRTHERN HYDRAULICS SUPPLIES -QUIP 58.23 tt'7 !tt! * 19$3 CIT OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER HECK NO*DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION t 159502 Obli5l83 754,149. _MN STATE TREASURER STATE THE ASLRER MCTOR VEH LIC PBL DKR LIC P3L 4 1595D2 - --D 6/15/83 06f15/A3 467.00 275900 MN' MN ST ATE TREASURER DRIVtRS LIC PBL 159502 4,891. t 1fi01 67 --t?bI13783-q.DS CINN GEN LIFE INS INSURANCE 160167 06/15!83 1 R.52 CONN GEN .LIFE INS INSURANCEINSURANC 160167 06/15/83 9 b;4 CONIC CONN CEN EE't: LIFE FELIFE IBS INS INSURANCE 1bD167 160167 06I15.183 06/15/83 18.52 CONK GEN LIFE INS INSURANCE r 160167 06/15183 ... - -- -28 46 _CONN GE N CF [4 LIFE LIFE IhS I1S IhS URWNC E INSURANCE f -----16016? - - - 16016? 06115183 Db /15/83 24004 8.60 CONA CON'S GEN LIFE INS INSURANCE 160967 __06!15183 11 • _._._.- 60.82 CONN CONA GEN GEN LIFE LIFE IhS - INS INSURANCE - INSURANCE 160!67 160167 Jb/15/83 06/15/93 437.91 CONN GEN LIFE INS INSURANCE j:.•160167 06/15/93 38.17 .. _CONN CONN GEN LIFE INS INSURANCE IN 160167 -bi93/3 . --27.12 46.76 CONK CEN CEN LIFE LIFE INS INS INSURANCE iZ3 160167 160167 06/15/83 06/15/83.-25075 CONN GEN LIFE INS INSURANCEZ1b706!15!83 105.24 CONN CE%LIFE IhS INSURA INSURANCE 160167 06/15/83 74.42 7 CONK CONN GEN GEN LIFE LIFE INS cIN1S INSURANCE r 1609 b7 1b1167 - - - - -- 06/15/83 - - - -- fl5/15/83 41.13 CONN GEN LIFE INS INSURANCE t ;1601 67 0 6/15 /$3 68,88 9.75 CONN CONN CEN GEN LIFE LIFE I S INS INSURANCE Ic3 160167 1601 67 - 06/15/83 05! /83 - -- __..25 * 5 -CONN GEN LIFE ItiS INSURANCE 160167 06/15193 20976 CONN CONN EN GEN LIFE LIFE i rS INS INSURANCE INSURANCE 3_160167 160 67 - - -- 06/15/83 Ob /f5l1;3- - -- 14064 11.33. _CONN GEN LIFE INS- -INSURANCE 760167 06/15/83 14.96 CONN GEN LIFE IhSIBS IASURINSUANCL 3; ,1b0 67 06/15183 3.6.6 CONN CONN CE1 6E N LIFE LIFE INS INSURANCE 160167 06/15/83 2 ?.30 CLAN GEN LIFL IhS INSURANCE . 1, 268.09 4C" 4n D 6/15 /83 -Z 579.73 MN ST ATE TREASURER MOTOR VEM LIC PBL ORTYERS LiC PBL 160502 06/15/83 206.00 RN STATE TRE.ASt RER 29885.75 96 *00 -CLERK GF DTSTR CAT - - - CATY DRI VERS LIC 96.00 S2 ff ! f t t 53 161 30 06/15/93 1.000.00 EMPL EEN£FIT CLAIMS _- _DENTA L INS 19000.00 1983 CITY OF MAFLEU00D CHECK RESISTER CHEC NO. D AM3UNT VENDOR ITEM DrS',"RIPTION i 3 161502 06/15/83 39 A01 .50 MN STATE TREASURER MOTOR Vitt LTC PBL 4.61502 _06115 /83 379.00 FN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC PBL 49180.50 t s 164302 06/15/83 4,99100 MN STATE TREASURER MCTOR VEH LIC PBL V 1645(02 —06J153 -- _.__37000 FN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC PPL 5, 361.00 165472 06/15/33 22.950000 METRO WASTE CONTROL SAC PBL b547 -Z -- -06115/p3 - -- - - -.225.50- -.. -.._..METRO WASTE CONTROL SAC PSL 1''i 229720.50 # t 2 • 1655C2 06115/33 2, 936.31 Fto' ST ATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC PBL 210.00 1 STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC FEL 123.39146931 2-178008 06/15f83 26.68 ACE HARDWARE SUPPL ^ES X78008 0 6, 5 193 T10.7 ACE ! ARDWARE SUPPLIES X23 17800$06/15/93 17.56 ACE HAR06ARE SUPPLIES k 55.01 lf 178'309 06/15/93 21969 ACRO•MTNNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPL1 21o68 0 6/ 15113 - -- - -196010 -AMERICAN INS ASSOC SUPPLIES 3 196.00 2 178046 06/15/93 10209 AGUAZ YME MIDWEST CHEMICAL TOILETS 179046 --06/13/133 -34.00 -AOL;AZYME MIDWEST CHEMICAL TOI LETS 136.00 b t * f t f 4r 178080 O6 /15 /g3 92.32 BATTERY + TIRE WHSE REPAT R MA I NT VEH i Cl D 6113$3_._.__150.90 BATTERY t TIRE WH SE REPAIR M A I NT VEH 178080 061151$3 39.36 BATTERY + TIRE kHSE REPAIR FAINT VEH 5t 282.58 + rL y ++ y 178089 --61151$3_33.02 EEMwTCRSET INC SUPPLIE sb 33,O2 1983 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK N0.DATE AMOUN VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPT 178 O 9 7 fl 6 /15 /33 7.66 BILL FOYER FORD SUPPLIES VEH! 5 7 .6 6 8'! __---Obj'f3183 - - -X6.34 33.45 BCARD CF WATER COMM BOARD OF WATER COMM UTILITIES UTILITIES 179103 178103 06/15/83 06!15/83 12.91 BOARD OF WATER COMM UTILITIES 7810'3 - - --0b/13/83- - -12,12 -- _ _BCARD CF MATER CCMV BOARD OF MATER COMM UTILIT ?ES UTILITIES 178103 06/15133 6 *48 91.30 1781 13 -_- -----bl15 !R3- -38.40 -- -BROWN PHOTO FILM PROCESS ING E 38,40 12' 178132 06/15/83 4. A CAFIT CL SUPPLY CO SUPPLIES VEH R - - 178146 06/15/83 20.95 CHIPPEW ,r ,PRING c ..WATER C 0 O L E R 20.85 33 179 Y65 6115183 500,74 - - -COCCI AS ELECTRICAL. C ELEC WORK 504.74 3 ~ 1 06/15183 189.16 COPY CUPLICATING PRO DUFLICATI!VG COST-' 44`178177 06/1518-3 12050 COFY EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES VEH 12.50 11 471 aT, a ^ -178193 • -_7E)6. 733783 IE -DAC _Y PAT - -_PLUMBING INS P r 840.0.0 S' i 53 178204 06/1 9.98 DEGE GARDEN CEATER SUPPLIES ie t 9098 1983 CITY OF MAPLEW30D CHECK REGISTER F , N0.CHECK DATE AMOUNT V _NDOR ITEM DESCRIPT110 N 2t- 3 178215 06/15 183 35.00 CTAPOND RADZATGR REP SI;FPIIES VEH 4 7 18 178219 06/1.6/83 459467.50 EAST CG LINE FIRE CE FIRE PROTECTION s 178219 0 49170.00 EAST CO LINE FIRE DE FIRE PROTECTION 10` _ __ _- __4 9 6 37.3 0- 7 3 -- - -. 14 178222 05/15183 50 EASTMAN KODAK CO DUPLICATING COSTS 178222 Db /15/83 106.12 EASTMAN KODAK CC -- -DUPLICATING COSTS J 6' - ..1$22- - - --0/15/83 - - - --399 _..EASTMAN KODAK CC pUPLICATING COS 17 178222 DbI151$3 265.79 EASTMAN KODAK CC DUPLICATING COSTS a 178222 06/15/83 25.96 E KODAK CO OUPIIC COSTS 191- - 178Z2Z - - -._0b/15r83 - - .._.._.470, -EASTMAN KODAK CC DUPLICATING CvST 178222 06/15/83 314077 EASTMAN KODAK CC OLFLICATIN6 COST t 21 1,632,62 22 6 /8 3 .110. 00 -EKELA C PAR DE' E +B EW ELL INS PREMIUM n110 .O 0 !i26 1782 06/15/33 163.17 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL C SUPPLIES VEH 31 ' 163,07 f 33 35 178255 06/15/83 25950 G + SERVICES UNIFORMS 36 178255 06/15/83 25.5D G +K SERVICES - -UNIFORMS 3; 178253~ ~ --X6%15/83 -- _25.SD G +K SERVICES UNIFORMS 5F 178255 06/15/83 147.05 G +x SERUTCES UKIFCRMS UNIFORMSi178255Ob/15/83 19.20 19.20 G +K SERVICES RVI CES _ ... _ -- - -G +K S..UNIFORMS f 178255 06/15/83 19.20 G +K SERVICES UNIFORMS 42` 178255 Ob /15/83 69.25 G +K SERVICES -UNIFORMS 253_ -_ .Ob /151$3 G + K SERVICES UhIFCRMS 144 17$255 06/15/83 19.10 G +K SERVICES UNIFORMS 45 178255 06/15183 19010 G +K SERVICE'S -UNIFORMS 4bi78255 _06%15/ $33 _19.10 G +K SERVICES UNIFORMS 178255 06/15/'g3 1$000 G +K SERVICES U FORMS 481 178255 46/15183 18.00 G +K SERVICES UNIFORMS 49 -- - --- --462 *'80 5 51 178269 06/15/83 26915 GMI K PARTS Cr'SUPPLIES VEH 53 S4 178 269 O 6115 58.41 8 4 5 6 -* GEAUI hE PARTS CO SUPPL VEH! 55t i 56 5 7; T.wR•fA1A R'+ A1wC .R'TRR.1'^!T`.11r. wrw'•wrsl -.. ,• .r. 1983 CITY OF MAFLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER t CH A0.DATE AMOUNT VENOCR ITEM OESCR IP TZ CN 2 3 178273 06/15/83 6960 GLADS TONE FIRE DEPT SUPPLIES 178273 - -06/15%83 —49 GLADSTONE FIRE DEPT FIRE PcOTECTi"N 178273 0 6/15/83 5 2 E50.00 CL ADS 70NE FIRE DEPT FIRE PROTECT A. 57,9 621 *60 7 9999- 178274 06/15/83 23 990 GL ADS T CNE LUMBER MAR SUPPLIES s:178274 06115/R3 39911 EL ADS TCNE LUMBER MAR SUPPLIES 4 6 3.01 179276 06/15/83 8000 GOODYEAR SERVICE STO SUPPLIES VEH 178276 06/15/83 83968 GOCDYEAR SERVICE STO SUFPLiES VEH 178276 --0 bI15183 --bO.SQ GO CJY EA R ftd VICE STO SUPPLIES VEH 6 179276 06/15/83 296.72 COCOYEAR SERVICE STO SUPPLIES VEH 178276 0 6/15P83 308.24 GOCDYEAR SERVICE S70 SUPPLIES V`H D 6/1 - /83 - -- - --34b,4 -GOODY EAR SE RVICE STO SUPPLIES VZ4 486.90 178287 Ob/15 f83 9905 GREW nNET _ . _.SUPPLIES z 178 2 87 -06/15/83 4944 GREW JANET SUPPLIES 178287 06/15/83 6904 tR1 .TA NET SUPPLIES 178287 06/15183 3.69 CREW JlLtiET SUPPLIES 2[1782$7 - - --06/15!83 -- -10000 GREW JANET SUPPLIES 1 178287 06/15/83 17.42 GREW .JANET TRAVEL TRAII'yii i 50964 1.05 SE -IS LOCK KH413E ..SUPPLIES VEH 178322 06/15/83 5.40 04TES LOCK + KEY SE SUPPLIES VEH 178322 Obl15 /M3 50,40 HOMES LOCK SE SUPPLIES VEH 78322 b /15TR3 - -- -6.15 - -QIES LOCK t KEY SE SUPPLIES VEH 37;6300 t t3E 173361 06/16/93 165900 J THOMAS ATHL =TIC SUPPLIES 178361 --Jb /16/83 - - --1b590D-J THOMAS ATHLETIC SUPPLI 178361 06/16/E3 165.00 J THOMAS ATHLETIC SUPPLIES 99:99 - -- -- - - 165.0 0 tom* 178'384 - - -- -101 039 -KhCX LUMBER SUPPLIES 1 .50 ,178384 06/15/83 65.79 KNOX LUMBER SUPPLIES 51.17B384 06/15/83 KNOX LUMBER SUPPL s_ 5 20.94- 14 6.2 4 y 53 9999 __ _999.9__.._ _ ... ._ _ s 178396 0 6/15183 42. 00 LAKE SANITAT RUBBISH R EMOVAL CHECK REGISTER IT OF MArL V%ju 71 CHECK hlo DATE AM13UNT VENDCR 179396 06115/83 127*50 LAWE ct-AhTTATICN 169 *150 ITEM DESCRIPT'O&'ON RUBBISH R"EMOVAL 782 00 LEAGUE OF MINN CIT IE 1 CONT PBL 10 178417 06/15/93 44*61 LEES AU TC SUPPLY SUPPLIES VEH SUPPLIES VEH 178 41 06/15/83 12.3 LEES AUTO SUPPLY 178417 06/15183 12087 LEES AUTO SUPPLY SUPPLIES VEH 46 2 56 19*63 LEES AUTO SUPPLY SLPPLIES VEH. 179417 06f15/83 LEES AUTO SUPPLY SUPPLIES VEH 178417 06/15193 tt : 4 6 LEES AUTO SUPPLY SUPPLIES VEH 178417 06/15/83 6*60 LEES AUTC SUPPLY SUPPLIES VEA s. 10745 22 DATA PROCESSING 178425 06/15183 1.396.67 LCGIS DATA PROCE'31SlING 178425 06/15183 672*77 LCGIS 29069.44 27 178428 06/15/013 43*50 LUCER LUMBER SUPP LIES SUPPLIES30*00 LUCER LUMBER06/15/R3179429 -- 17 8 4-2 8 114 *00 LUCER LUMBER SUPPLIES 187.50 331 • ... ... 3 A 1-37 33 178435 O6 /15/13 24*04 PACGiJEEK EQUIPMENT I SUPPLIES VEH 17R435*' 23.31 IVACGUEEr EQUIPMENT I SUPPLIES 47.35 14 4 FILM PROCESSING 178440 06/15f83 4905 PANCO PhOTO 49.15 G<. MAPLE60CC- REWIL-6 OFFICE S UPP L I c-'S 178452 06/15f83 55e00 APLEkOCC REVIEW PUBLISHING 4e 178452 06/15183 197*12 X78 4 57'— -0 6 I15 78 3 465*53 MAPLEWOOD REVIEW PUBLISHING 50 179452 06116t83 *01 10 ADLE6000 REVIEW PUBLISHING 1 17R452 06115/83 23.29 PAFLEiOCC REVIEW PUBLISHING 40*93 52 t53 134' 1 179475 06/15183 METRO lhSP SERW ELEC INSPECTN 57 l 1983 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK N0 DATE AMOUNT VEADCR ITEM DESCRTP s z }1.267.80 3! 4 j 5? 178510 06/15/83 284016 MINNESOTA TOR C SUPPLIES 17851D --Ob1T5183___ - _ . _ -.20.D0 _MINNESOTA TORO TRAVEL TRAI ;U ll' e 304. 178530 061 1 MN DEPT PUBLIC SAFTY APRIL MA:NT 1 1 i t4, ZE X17. 178551 06/15183 80000 MN RTC + PARKS ASSCC MEMBERSHIP 80.00 Z•: 06/151?3 -189000'MOGR= h BROS LANDSCAP SUPPLIES 178567 06/15/R3 7500 MOCRE N BROS LANDSCAP SUPPLIES 114 178567 06/15/83 99000 FC(RE N BROS LANDSCAP SUPPLIES 1 99900 -PO GR= N BROS LANDSCAP SUPPLIES Inc. 178567 0 6115 /83 75.00 M OGRE A EROS LANDSCAP SUPPL Iz 537.00 4 v _ , .__._05715..183_R73.40 -OPOTOR CL A INC -.CONTRACT PY4 178576 06/15183 873.90—MOTOR CL INC CCNTRACT PYM 178576 06/15183 873090 MDTCR CLA INC CONTRACT PYM 4 t 178586 06115 9.00—M!UN I C + PRIVATE S ERV CONTRACT PYM 178 06 /15/83 845.50 MUWIC + PRIVATE SERV CONTRACT-PYM P 36.5 0- 143 44 178592 06/15/83 47.50 MUNIC ILITE CO SUPPLIES t ; 1785 06/15 46.55 MUNICILITE CO SUPPLIES 471 178596 06/15/83 4 MUNICIPAL CODE CCRP CODE flRflINA'VCE 5:4.081.90 52 53 ! ! * • 4 1441:54 NORTH ST PAUL CITY -UTILITIES 178647 06/15/83 53.10 NCRTH ST PAUL CITY UTILITIES 1rV ^•.•w.!^ »iR'^M 'i .i "r = '.'.fiR77r TC'n. R.wl. a w.. f /' 4Lj-1983 CITY OF MA FLE WOOD CHECK REGISTER V= CHECK h0. DATE AMOUNT NOCR.._ ITEM DESCRIPT:O'J z 178647 Ob /!5/83 1 WORTM ST PAUL CITY PYM CONTRACT 2 * - e i 8b38 --- p713/83 _—__- _ _ 9:0D ---- NORTHERN STATES PONE UTILITIES e! 178658 06115/83 3,53 NCRTHERN STATES P 0 UE UTILITIES e 178658 06/15183 2.40 hCRTHERN STATES POLE UTILITIES 2.40' - --. -- " - .. NCFTHERA STATE'S P06E UTILITIES 178658 06/15183 2.40 NORTHERN STATES POWE UTILITIES 17 3658 06/15/83 2.40 h CFTHERN STATES P OWE UTILITIES 178658 -- -- .06/15/83 - - - 88.62 NCFTHERl STATES POiE UTILITIES a` 178558 06/15/83 95090 NORTHERN STATE'c POLE UTILITIES s`: 178658 06/15/83 5 NORTHERN STATES P06_ UTILITIES Ah STATES -- UTILITIES E` 178b5 ---.. POLE06!15 %R3 -_ _- ---- --- --- 414.0 - h CFTN_ 178658 06/15/93 30.97 hCRTHERN STATES POkE UTILI TIES s 178658 06/15/513 _ _ - l 7.93 - - NORTHEPh STATEc POWE UTILI S s ,s - - 17865E - - - - -- - 06 5.97 ACRTHEPIN STATES P06E UTILI T TE 27.48 ACRTHERN STATES POLE UTILITIES 178658 06/15/83 i2;' 178658 06/15/P3 4.25 NORTHERN STATES PDW UTILITIES 93 hGPTH'Rh STATES POWE UTILITIES1 -- - - - - -- 06/15/83 -- - - 420, 1 178658 06/15/83 218988 A CPT H_Rh STATES POLE UTILITIES ti-a` 178658 06!15183 73.64 N STATES POLE UTILITIES 179658 - 06115f83 - 14200 NORTHERN STATES P 0 UE UTILITIES 79 48 5.72 r7 :4 J 4 1 12g 17866 06/15/83 31960 NORTNiiI?STERN BELL TE TELEPHONE 3786bT 06/13/83 -_ - _ - 50.90 NCRTHWESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE 17866fl 976/15183 50.90 NCFTHWESTERN BELL TE TELEPHO 178 6610 06/_15183 ..... -- -. .. N OPTH iEST R N BELL T_ TELEPHONE 1 _ 178660 —_.- - -- 0b V83 _ ---- 70,8D NC EST tRN BELL TE TcLPHONE 3 _ 80.7 5 NOPTHkESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE 178660 06/15!83t j3f 178 660 06/15/83 - -- - _ 76.59 NORTHWESTER N BELT. TE TELE . HJNE 178660 ^ - 06/15/83 80,75 NCPTH4ESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE ItCPTHWESTERN BELL TE TElEPH01£ 178660 06/15183 80.75 178660 06/15/83 80.75 NORTHWESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE Q . - -- 06/15 %$3 70..80 NORTH WEST ER N BELL TE 1?8 TELEPHONE 66 - -- 17B6bD Ob11S1g3 101,Ofl NCRTHWESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE i.. 45,40 ACRT# ?ERN FELL I TELEPHONE 178660 06/15/83 178660 - 06115/83 55,85 NORTHWESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE 4 , 927.74 + 71 fl6/151a3 249 fl 0 DOMINION BRUSH REPA MA INT 1 .00 L 6 3 178690 06/15/83 4.170.00 PARKSTDE FIRE DEPT FIRE PROTC7I 5: 171690 06/1 339000000 - PAPKSIDE FIRE ©EPT _ - FIRE PROTECT 3 7 917 D .D O 5 t 1 r.... ...........,,...r..L.'_. / ' ..5,..,- -cam•_- . _-- _ 1983 CITY OF MAFLEW00D CHECK REGISTER CHECK N09 DATE AMOUNT VENDGR ITEM DESCRIPTIOUN 31 1 786 06/15/83 2, 075.00 FETER SON. BELL CONY JUNE RETAI NEP i 5 6i *lfft s 176762 06115/83 5.87 REEDS SALES + SERVIC SUPPL IES 5.87 so E 9 *00 - RICE STREET CAR WASH SUPPLIES VEH 4 178768 06/15/83 4050 RICE STREET CAR WASH SUPPLIES VEH 178768 06115/83 9000 RICE STREET CAR WASH SUPPLIES VEH X78768 - - - - -- 06i #3/ 3 ..___.__._.___._._.. -_. - 1R00D__ _. - RICE STREET CAR WASH SUPPLIES VEH E 1/8768 flbI15/83 18000 RICE STREET CAR WASH! SLFPLIES VEH t : F 178768 06/15/83 9.00 i787b8 RICE STREET CAR WASH SUPPLIES 1IcH 13.-5p -STREET CAR WASH SUPPLIES V E ti06/15 83 tz`. 178768 06/15183 4.50 RICE STREET CAR WASH SUPPLIES VEH+ 17876$ lbl15 /83 18,00 RICE STREET CAR WASH SUPPLIES VEH 2:___178768__' - -'06/l5183 - -- 4950 RICE STREET CAR WASH SUPPLIES VEM 17868 06115/83 13.50 RICE STREET CAR WASH SUPPLIES VEH R'CE4' 178768 06/'15/83 13950 STREET CAR WASH SUPPLIES VEH 17$768 _._ .._. 06/15/83 -- - - 1.3050 - RICE STRE "T CAR WASH SUPPLIES VEH e- 178768 06/15/83 4.50 RICE STREET CAR WASH SUPPLIES VEH 1 06/15/83 4.50 RICE STREET CAR WQSH SliPPTES VEH 1 30.50 f a 17877th 06/15/83 14078 RICHA RVS MARKET OFFICE SUPPLIES 334 fi • R ! 34' - 4 ! *! *!f T97 - Db7i6183 - - -- 6;23 -- RUGGED RENTAL RUGS RUG CLEANING r`' 178792 Ob /16 /x!3 6 BUGGED RENTAL RUGS RUG CLEANING 3 178792 06/16/133 40.65 RUGG RENTAL RUGS RUG CLEANING i - --RENTAL RUGS - RLG CLEAN: NGI -,- 178T9Z 25 - -- Obilbi83 _ s___ 6. RUGGcC R i 14; 178792 06/16/83 40. RUGGEC RENTAL RUGS RUG CLEANING 142 100.05 4 644; i 1 _ I. _. - -- - - 50.75 _ - -- RrCO SUPPLY CG SUPPLIES 145 178794__ - -- - O 6/ 16/83 - - - 50.75 411' _ ir c, 51 178798 06/16/83 11. S * T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES s2; 178798" - - -- -. -.- 06 __ _ ___ .. - ._ 20.69 S + T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLTES 33' 173798 06/16/83 21.25 S + T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 178798 06/16183 3.$4 S * T CFFICE FRCDUCT OFFICE SU 5• - 178798 14995-S * T OFFICE FRCDUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES ss' 178798 06/16/83 094 S * T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPL IES k571 LLJ 1983 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER r CHE N09 DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCR1PTI ON z i 178 T 9 8 0 6/16183 29.36-S + T OFFICE PR CDUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 31 178798 06/16/83 74.76 S + T OFF ICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 4 - __178798 06/16/83 - -26.30 SUPPLIESS + T CFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE S 178798 06/16/83 2.24 S + T C PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLI 178798 06/16/83 11000 S + T CFFICE FRCDUCT CFFICE SUPPLIES 33. - 84 -S + T OFF ±CF PRODUCT -OFFICE SUPPLIES r !8 178798 0 6/16/83 19020 S + T OFFICE FR ODUCT OFFICE SU °PL IES 9 178798 06/16/83 7020 S + T CFF TCE FRC CFFICE SUPPLIES sc 17879-$--- - - - -Ob/16183 --4ti.21 S + T CFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 178798 06/16/83 6.40 S + T OFFICE PRODUCT CFFICL SUPPLIES 178798 06/16/74.40 S + T CFFICE PR CDUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 3 286A2 Q t E' 1788+04 06/16!83 2.02 SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MI SUPPLIES 8 2.0 2 2, A O 06/16/83 69.98 SEARS ROEBUCK + CO SUFPL IES d 23 69.9 8 26 178841 06/16/83 715.95 ST PALI. CITY CF MAY RADIO MA"!NT 178841 0 6116/83 21 6.40 S ! FTPAILCITYC MAY R NA II 2f,178841 05!16/83 236.00 ST PALL CITY CF'.MAY RADIO MA TNT 178841 06/16/p3 9.45 ST PAUL CITY GF PHOTO SERVICES 3 1 , 177,80 132.178842 06116 /83 46.80 ST PAUL CI SP ATCH PUSLI SHI N3 34 46.90 178888 06/16/83 76,50 TIME S SUSN DATA PROCESSING 76.5 0 178889 06/16/83 2 T A S CHIFSKY REPAIR MA INT 29150.60 178890 06/16/83 1408 TARGET STORE'S INC CFFICE SUPPLIES 4=178890 061116/83 84.51 TARGET STORES IhC FROG SUPPLIES 178890 -06/16/83 12.53 112902 TARGET STORES IAC SLFPLIES f 8 °178902 06/16/83 295,91 TCLZ KThG DUVALL CCNTRACT PYM 52 178902 _ —06 /IAIP3 - -7 TOLZ KING DUVALL CONTR ACT PYM 1 53 7, 734,70 + 154 . ' t °1789 06/16183 260.00.TRUCK UTILITIES + HF SUPPLIES vEH l9. P. l .A/'r!•. 14' . l .ifcwwOlCR.IRST71R'/l br Y. ''ISR'.Y.I ._YRNi.f^v---AO'.•L-- •..-.1 - 1983 CITY r OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK N09 DATE AMOUNT VEND.CR ITEM DESCRIPTION 260.00 3 J 7 f.6.: 178918 06/16/VR3 30.40 TWIN CITY JANITOR SU SUPPLIES JANTOR30.4 0 178922 06/16/83 16.40 TWIN CITY HA RD6ARE C SUPPLIES 16.40 14' • *it4 lt4t 178928 06/16/83 295.00 TWIN CITY TESTING CONSTR TESTING29500 12 1 _ _ - 178932 06/16/9-3 06136!93 38.70 115.85 UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNL IMI TED UN FG MIR S 178932 06/16/193 121.85 UNIFORMS UNLTED UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNIFORMSi:!4 178932 178932 _ 06/16/83 05!16183 - -- 186.q0 UNCIFORMS UNL IMT TED UNIFORMS 178932 06x16/83 53:90 UN?FO PMS UNt IMi TED UNIFORM S z 178932 _06/16183 60 250.00 UNIFGRMS U N TF ORyS UNLIMITED UNL IPI TED UNIFORMS UNIFORMS178932 — 29 : 178932 06/16/83 - - - - -- - -- 06/16/83 11 5.00 9.35 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS s UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 90 z .0 5 t 06 • - - - - -_ _ _. _...13.60 - -UNIVERSAL Mao - - - -SupT31ies:13.60 3E; 3_A; 178947 178947 - 0 6/16/$3 - - - - 06/16/83 1 967.30 819.05 VALS BODY SHOP REPAIR MAINT V H 4Z VA LS EDDY SHOP REPAIR MAI NT vEh 2 t i 44. e. 4 _ 178 - ss \/ /'j T a WARNEPS TRUE-Vatee moTi 'b l 16 18 3 - 1 SUFPI IES 4:8 6 f' } ,6 - Ll_d _ IRA' A'S T R t 1 r U A* 1 1 t' N S U PP f V V i 7G E' s 6 P rs . s r c —VS., - s ,S099 E D f 53 54 tt *fit* E 1789613 06116I83 6.00 1iEEER TROSETH INC SUPPLIES VLH j CHEC REGISTER UJ 1983 CITY OF P.APLEWOOD CHEC AJ. DA A MOUNT VENDOR 1 TEM DESCR IP TI O C 6e00 5j g` 17897$0616/83 131054 XEROX CORRORATICN DUPLICATING 131.54 _ .- XERCX CCRPORATI CN - DUPLICATING 263.08 t t ,z' 1 06/16/83 32.62 PORSE CLIATON LEGAL 32.62 *. t ,G. E 17; 178C18 06/16183 50.00 JI W HATCH SALES SLPPL?ES a 178018 0 480 JIM HATCH SALES - SUPPLIES 9$0 , 90s c ' 22 3. 178C40 06/16/83 17.94 PAC DCNALD JOHN T TRAIN, &! G 17.94 ; 2.7 00 KENNETH COLLINS TRAVEL TRAINING 179C5$ - - -- b/16t8 -3 -- - -_ 150 15.00 L , 225: ATCHISON JOHN H Una ,forms - 225.43 34 !* t t # • 35 178077 06 / 16/83 11.18 CLSCN GECFF TRAVEL TRAINING MV 4:' 178p43 06/16/83 45.00 CUSICK DENNIS EMT I KSTRUCT CR 1. 1 45.00 i45;r4 — 17805 — i1bl1 %8S - -_ -- - 3D.t0 - LUKIN STEVEN -- - - ElwT I NSTRUCT CR f ! 147 30.0 0 118 ! t 50' 17806 06/16/83 97.20 _._._ CHAPI A PUBLISH PUBLISHING 97.20 55 6 17ED79 06/16/83 38.90 ALLAMSON BUSINESS CFFICE SUPPLI ES i 57f r 1983 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER t CHEC A09 DATE AMOUNT VENDCR ITEM DESCRIPTION r z 38.90 3 4 ffft! Si r 178F06 06/46.64 CRESSER INDUSTRIES SUPPLIES VEH 6644 . g 4 17RF20 06/16/83 71o63 ROTC FRESS OFFICE SUPPL I S 17BF20 06/16!83 240.32 RCTO PRESS OFFICE SUPPLIES 462.01 _ _...ROTC PRESS _ .. -- - _GFFICE SUPPLIES 773.96 it lie;178F39 06/16/83 30.59 EALSCF 8 LOMB SUPPLIES 1e .-30:59 t -_ . E 2a: z;;ITS F40 0 6/ 16f83 10000 B OULA Y ALFRED TRAVEL TRA I N I%G zz- f 10.00 -* I`3, IYBF41 fa 06/16/E3 8000 BARRETT MARLYS REFUND 27 17OF42 06/16/83 199.35 BRYAN ROCK REC ROCK 22 06116183 2059 BRYAN RCCK REC UC 178 F42 06/16/83 202.96 BRYAN ROCK KREC, ROCK 17BF42 06/16/83 20701 BRYAN ROCK RAC ROCK in F42. __p 6/16/83 -- --208.82 - -BRYAN ROCK'-REC ROCK t X023.80 34! 17 &F4 3 - " -0 6 16 f8 3 _- --100.00 CHURCH CF SACRED HRT OAMAG: DEPOSIT t T,17BF43 06/16/83 50000 Cf4LRCI- CF SACRED HRT DAMAGE DEPOSIT 150.00 t 3 - 11 178F44::06/16183 9 CAMERCN SANDRA REFUND 39 9.00 t 4"t 178F45 D6/16183 1600 CAFLSCN BETTY REFUND 42 16.00 4. t '44'118F46 06/16/83 12,95 B CALTON BOCK 45;12.95 ,f 178F47 06/16183 24705 ENRICHA BOOKS BOOKS 40 247.05 so'17SF48 06/16/83 1 •530.00 EMERG MEE SEPVI CES CONTRACT PYM 5,4 1 9 530.00 53 178F49"06/16/83 9 FLAHc RT Y MARJOP IS REFUND 54!9000 581 sb t s:. 17RF50 06/16/83 11,70 FRLAD LESTER REFUND OF MAFLE WO OD CHECK REGISTER 1983 CITY CHECK N0.DAT AMOUNT VNDOR ITEM DESRIP TI4N 4 11070 3 ! 4 06"/16/83--- -3T1.R2 FUN SERVIES -RENTAL EQUIP F 374.82 15.00 -- --NUCSON, PATRICIA REFUND E a 15.00 J RF53 l 6.41 HORSNELL w TRAVEL TsAZNILG I.,16.41 A78F54 _.._.06 /16./!3.8000 MOLES MARY REFUND 00 te-06716!83__ -15.00 1-;AEERTY RANDY REFU 15.00 y `"Its --17SFSb - '- 06/16'83 15 . _DO cHALLMA6GI:.REFUND 15.00 60.00 -ILLUM MIME JULY 4TH 60.00 178F38 -U6116/83 -24,00 KR CAVID REFUND 24.00 2 118F59 - -';06/16/83 75 *00 KLINGSPORN MARK REFUND 4 1 75.00 k ' 3`178F6n --061ib%83 __504.00 LEAGU.. OF MN CITIESr c _CCNTR ACT PYM 504.00 8.00 LINOHCLM DOROTHY REFUI40 8.00 IF 178P62 --Ob1b83 - -11000 -FAAAGEMENT LEARNING MLrBEEiSHIP 11.00 658.16 01CYE ST DIRE STEEL SUPPL 658.16 178F6 - -- - --06/16/83 45.00 RENT ALL MINN SUFPL IES VEN 45.00 k 178F65 06116/83 3000 MT ii=l ICH PHYLLIS REFUN D 15.0 0 V f 13 8.00 _.__MC DONALD ' C 50 8.00 i 1 P 06%16$3 46.06 NORTHLANC IND TOOLS SUPPLIcS 46.06 5 s.. 178 F b 8 -. - „D 6 / 16 13.DD --OFIT2 CONNIE -._. -- __ --REFUND 1_1561 15.00 f J/'t '1"a1Fe' -- 1_ fry. /ate T1CST1lII'Awe+ tIi •Rr..- .Mw7l,tVtlf._+•• - 1/+fv.w.. 1983 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK A0.DATE AMOUNT VENOCR ITEM DES"RIP TI 0 r Z ! s 17B 0 15,00 CLSON ANITA REFUND 15.00 51 6 178F7 06/5.85 CTTO MARIE REFUND a 178F71 06116/83 45.00 PARK PRACTICE -NRPA MEMBERSHIP o .45000 178F72 "06/16/83 15000 PETERSON KAR REFUND 3 15*011 t _ 14 1s`178F73 06/16183 15.00 FCLICE MARKSMAN ASSN MEMBERS 15.00 11 178F7 06/16/83 11944 RASCHKE ALBERT TRAVEL TRAINING t1 2 2•178F75 06/15/83 8.963.46 RUSCO ELECTRONICS FUEL SYSTEM t 123 e 2_ITSF76 06/16/83 19168.00 SHAMRCCK CONST CC SUPPLIES EQUIP J 19168.00 2 t ;'178F77 ;;Ob/I6/83 160,00 STORYTALERS JULY 4TH t 28,160.00 178F78 06/16/83 4 OODoOD TR AMP F WALTER D TR =ES3t',4,0;00.00 1 3 17SF 7 06/16183 181 .80 TH CMP SON ENTERPRISES SUPPLIES Ao I_17BF80 06/16/F3 52.90 WAGERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 17 -BF-80 - - - --06/'16/83- - - -131.0 URGERS INC _. _ - - -_MAINT AGREEM - 18 3.90 06%16/83 - - -14,31 DATA CISFATCHING INC DELIVERY 4i 14.31 1 - 4 178 F82 - .. -0 6116183 -15000 YALLIN MARCIA REFUND 15900 4 '-178F - 8-06/16/83 150.00 UESTBERG RONALD JR REFUND 47'15040 ff 48I X43 5000 US CIVIL DEFENSE - -MEMBE. RSlIP 5.00 S' 06/16/83 85.94 ZAPPA JOSEPH UNIFORMS 53 85 t 1T_17BF - 86 - --O 6116/83 -3,t 299.00 ASSN CF METRO MLN ICI SUBS MEM BERS HIP 1561 3.299.00 F n..+' ..' •, a.....+R- -• -+"^'- -- _ -..,, .-..- rows..... sc ^ t - - ++. _ - -- >r. ..iv. -/ 1 s - ...._ _.. 1983 CITY OF MAPLEYOOD CHECK REGISTER f CHECK AO. DATE AM FOUNTV N00R ITEM DESCRIPTiO'+ 3 ITBF87 06/16/83 90000 DON SKALMAN FIREARMS UNIFORM SUPPLIES 4 - - -- --- - - - - -- _ _ 80000 5' 7 -- — - -__- -- - 352 ,p3060*89 - - F'UN0 01 TOTAL i 97204 FUND 03 TOTAL 4, 000.00 FUND 11 TOTAL 295.91 - -- . FUNC 61 TOTAL - 10. 62.628.86 FUNC 65 TOTAL 7 FUND 81 TOTAL 97 FUNC 90 TOTAL 19000.00 FUNC 94 TOTAL 5 12 , 0 0980R*O FUNC 96 TOTAL S3.7•- 936 ,:18 TCTAI lei INDICATED ITMES FINANCED BY RECREATIONAL FEES rz - 12 r a L . r t 3 f 1 a•; X41 43 i 145' a <' i i 4: 48 _. ..- -- -- - -- -- 4 So 52 54 5 54 5G CITY OF MAPLE WOOOD PAYROLL- CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8011 CHECK DATE 06 -17.83 PERIOD ENDING 06 -10 -83 PAGE 1 DEPT -NO EMPL -N4 EMPLOYEE 4AME CHECK -NO AMOUNT CLEARE3 0002 4 BEHM L CI S N 0613 - , 00001 445931 t 0002 206242018 EVANS BARRY R 0613- 00002 1 ,121. 32 t f s,0002 1 r 0010 473664474 JAHN DAVID J 0613 -00003 224.07 t 0010 475143403 PELOQUIN ALFRED J 0613 -00004 55.08 t 1 0010.469869481 SCHLE ICHER JOHN F 0613w00005 0000 t K f 0010 279.15 0011 475500285 MCPHE RSON JOANNE F 0613 -00 006 0000 t x i D012 357340166 CURE LAR J 0613- 00007 148.43 c 0012 470520124 DOHERTY KATHLEEN M 0613 -00008 356.85 0012 471400408 2UERC HER JOHN L 0613-00009 119.65 'c f 0012 624.93 0021 469501078 FAUST DANIEL F 0613a-00010 977.13 t 0021 977.13 0022 46920061 HAGEN ARLINE J 0613.00011 425.85 t 1 0022 390444446 _MATHEYSALANA K 0613 -00012 488.73 '_ ...._.. t 0022 476704432 MOELL ER MARGARET A 0613 -00013 0000 t X f 0022 473327550 VIGOREN DEL OREE S A 0613-00014 379.33 0022 1 9293.91 13i i 0031 471322/98 ' ..AUREL IUS'LUCILLE E 0613- 00015 818026 0031 474264816 SELVO G .BETTY D 0613- 00016 493.84 c 0031 19312.10 0032 476269515 SCHAD T JOANNE L 061 3 -00 017 191.60 0032 191.60 0033 477288389 GREEN PHYLLIS C 11613 -00 018 529969 t f 0033 472244994 HENSL Elf PATRICIA A 0613 -00019 187973 t 0033 476620547 KELSEY CONNIE L 0613 -00020 195.42 0033 468364435 VIETOR LORRA INE S 0613-00021 0000 K 0033 912.84 + 0034 037144969 FREDERICKSON RITA M 0613-00 02 2 0904 t X 1 0034 474097528 STOTTLEMYER EDITH G 061 3 -00023 0000 X I i 0034 OQ33 468364435 vietor Lorraine 0613- 00001a 393.19 Ask CITY OF MAPLE VOOOD PAYROLL• CHECKS REGISTER DEPT -NO EMPL -NO EMPLOYEE NAME CYCLE 8011 CHECK DATE 06-11 X33 PERIOD ENDING 06.10.83 PAGE 2' CHECK -NO AMOUNT CLEARED r Ark 0041 184440036 BASTYR DEBORAH A 0613 -00024 298087 0041 468461717 COLLINS KENNETH V 0613 -00025 213.79 E 0041 392240565 HAGEN THOMAS L 0613-00026 413.11 t 0041 477227636 CMATH JCY E 0613 -00027 376.41 0041 471502356 RICHI E CAROLE L 0613 -00028 315.41 t oft 0041 468602934 SVENOSEN JOANNE M 0613 -00029 470.31 t 0041 2 X087.90 o 1 1 t 0042 477481364 ARNOLD DAVID L 0613- 00030 3461-11 , 0042 471402115 ATCHI SON JOHN H 0613.00031 690.30 0042 469689867 BOWMA A RICK A 0613 -00032 447.37 t i 0042 468461930 CLAUSON 'DALE K 0613 -00033 217.87 t 0042 4764461 19 DREGER RICHARD C 0613- 00034 701.66 0042 470267887 GREEN NORMAN L 0613- 00.035 636.34 t 0042 469568516 HALYEG KEVIN R 0613 -00036 552.40 t 0042 469820466 HEINZ STEPHEN J 0613 -00037 563.55 t 1 0042 473604916 HERBERT MICHAEL J 0613 -00038 596.74 t 0042 476528607 JAQUI TH_DANIEL R 061 3 -00039 583.80 t 1..:} _.._ _ ___..._....._._...,__....... __.. ....0042 392760009 KARIS FLINT D 0613 -00040 440.55 - - 0042 472.222231 KORTUS OCNALD V 0613 -00 041 354.93 t 0042 471 LANG RICHARD J 061 3 -00 442 188018 t 0042 468181347 MCNUL TY .JOHN -J 0613-00043 177.43 t VOID r•.I s7,0.042 471627417 METTLER DANIEL 6 0613 -00045 693.12 t I 0042 469442063 MOESCHTER RICHARD M 0613 -00046 173.83 t f 0042 476340990 M OREL LI RAYMOND J 0613-00047 680.72 t 0042 475323/83 NELSON ROBERT D 0613-40 04 8 686.43 t 1 0042 468462884 PELTiER WILLIAM F 0613 -00049 672.35 -_.t f 1,4,32!0042 4705 SKALMAN DCNALO W 0613 -00050 16? *08 t 1 33 0042 473548226 STAFNE GREGORY L 0613- 00051 618.73 is 0042 471721204 ._STEFFEN SCOTT L 0613 - 00052 Z3250 t 0042 471500251 STILL VERNON T 0613 -00053 573.68 t f 0042 471629204 STOCKTON DARRELL T 0613 -00054 701.99 t 0042 474260130 2APPA JOSEPH A 0613 -00 OS 5 622.95't 1 I =-V1 0042 12075 0043•475548434 BECKER RONALD D.0613.00056 239.89 t I 0043 4694 41789 GR AF DAVID M 0613 -00 057 539.04 t 0043 47640/388 LEE ROGER W 0613 -00058 633.54 t 0043 473567791 MELANDER JCN A 0613 -00459 31.80 t D043 468360918 NELSON CAROL M 0613.00 060 992.61 t 0043 471504316 RAZSKA2OFF DALE E 0613 -00061 684.96 c f 0043 471564901 RYAN MICHAEL P 0613 -00062 487.76 t i 0043 474486071 VORYE RK ROBERT E 0613- 00063 320.06 0043 469502201 Y4UNGREN JAMES G 0613 -00064 648.75 t 0043 4 9 578.41 0045 471401878 EMBERTSON JAMES M 0613.00065 655084 t i 0042 474607686 Meehan James 061300044A 627.26 t, I i CITY OF MAPLEW000D PAYROLL- CHECKS REG DEPT -NO EMPL•NO EMPLOYEE NAM 0045 472242227 SCHADT 1 0045 1 0046 4684 01899 CAHAN ES 0046 477627236 FLAUGHER 0046 475587232-FULLER 9046 473807030 MARTIN 0046 4723659/9 NELSON 0046 468600183 RA8 ?NE 0046 475363333 WILLIAMS 0046 6i .- ._._...___ ._ ....._.- .._..... - -- _0051 471440267 BARTA 0051 473566872 RAIDER 00.51 504483174 YEGWE RTH 0051 z;0052 496308314 CASS 0052.471526254 FREBERG 0052 474788580 GONTJES 0052 502544037 HELEY D052 471601083 HOCHB AN 0052 471501241 KANE' 0052 468363473 KLAUS ING 0052 471500547 MEYER 0052 476904500 OSWAL D 0052 468166755 PRETT NER 2.1 0052 472241484 REINERT 33!0052 470346224 TEVLI N"R 0052 i 0053 -472481010 EL IAS i''0053 167246109 G£ ISS LER 9 0053 501464671 GESSE LE 0053 ._-398527954 N OUSE D053 475441688 PECK 0053 476622458 P I LLA 73KE 0053 472662522 PRIEBE 0053 0054 475601431 LUTZ 0054 ow 0058 471562563 BREHE IM 5 0058 474927/28 CAHANES 0058 477602582 EDSON lvwk I ST ER CYCLE E ALFRED ANTHONY JAMME JAMES SHAWN KAREN JANET DUANE MARIE KENNETH JUDITH WILLIAM RONALD JOHN R CNALO. JOSEPH MICHAEL HENRY GERALD E RI CK JOSEPH EDWARD HARRY JAMES WALTER JAMES MARY DENNIS DAVID WILLIAM DAVID ROGER JOSEPH DAVID 8011 CHECK DATE 06 -17 -83 CHECK -NO AMOUNT C 0613-00066 701.66 1 X357.50 G 0613 -00067 146.59 L 0613-00068 464.15 0 0613-00069 467.49 M 0613 -00 070 408.82 A 0613-00071 421.62 L 0613 -00 072 408.82 J 0613-00 073 490.09 2 X813.58 L 0613.00 074 2 76, 74 G 0613-00075 171o25 A 0613 -OD 076 362o99 810.9 8 C 0613 -00077 594021 L 0613 -00078 333.55 A 0613 -00079 295.09 1 0613 -OD 080 542.82 H 0613.00 081 0000 R 0613-00 082 394.91 _ F 0613 -OD 083 485.86 W 0613 -00 084 434s13 D 0613-40085 3 04.20 6 0613 -00 086 714.35 A 0613•OO 08 7 547.65 J 0613 -00088 547.57 59194934 G 0613-00089 571 M 0613-00090 574.l1 T 0613-00091 7 52.04 P 0613 -00 09 2 314.76 L 0613-40 093 489017 J 0613-00094 778 0613 -00 09 5 4 79, 01 3 .96 0.11 P D613-00096 389.91 389.91 W 0613 -00097 498.94 A 0613 -OD 098 304.20 B 0613 -00099 604.87 PERIOD ENDING 06=1&w83 PAGE CLEAREI t I t 1 t 1 t 1 t ) t t ) t t K ) t t t 1 t f t 1 t t ) t c t ) . t t 1 3 i j CITY OF MAIPL.EW000D MAYROLL- CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8011 CHECK DATE 06 -17.83 PERIOD NDING 06 -10 -83 PAGE 4 I OEPT -NO EMPL -oNO EMFLOYEE NAME CHECK -NO AMOUNT CLEARED 0058 47054/590 MULWE GEORGE W 0613-09100 510.35 t 3 0058 471501014 NADEA U EDWARD A 0613 -00101 475.73 t D058 468361720 FoUTESCN LAVERNE S 0613- 00102 411.44 t 0058 471.365993 0 YEN GERALD C 061 3 -0010 3 508.92 t 0059 3014.45 * I 0059 476249760 MACDONALD JOHN E 0613- 00'104 460.39 t U 0059 475501000 MULVA NEY.DENNIS M 0613 -00105 615.31 t 0059 1075.70 f 0061 477301066 BRENNER LOIS J 0613 -00106 174.51 t 468341993 KRUMM EL BARBAR A 0613 - 00107 145.08 t Li 061 473260389 QOEGA RD ROBERT 0 0613- 00'10 8 878 74 NIJ D061 468582618.STAPLES PAULINE 0613-&00109 693.78 t 0061 X21'0062 473709024.BAU ER ALANN H 0613 oU 110 0.00 t x 0062 _ ...._BURKE MYLES R 0613 - 00111 6to99 t f l3j 0062 474608182 GERMA IN DAVID A 0613 -00112 527.86 t I.0062 472303411 -GUSINOA MELVIN J 0613 -00113 770.49 t 1 0062 474924209 HAAG M J 061 3- 00 11 4 _320900 t op 0062 502544121 H£LEY ROLAND 8 061 -00115 556s60 t 0062 473969784 HU ER TONY 0613-00116 31.34 t 0062 `471748313 LIBHARDT THOMAS 0 3-w00 117 0.00 t;•.:,0062 473565506 MARUS KA MARK A 0613.00118 542. 27 i 0062 468941946 PETER SON PAUL G 0613 -00119 18.00 t f ,0062 474078128 -RASCHKE ALBERT F 061300120 206.46 t. 00+62 47 7646662 SANDQUIST THOMAS J 0613m00121 0000 t k 33 0062 476203439 SANTA REED E 061.3 -00122 128.33 t 34 0062_474845176 -.SPANN MARTIN J 0613 -00123 -_._0.00 IV 0062 473660035 STARK RICHARD E 0613 -00124 0000 t X'1351j 0062 477881931 TO YNL EI!PATRICK J 0613 -00125 307.03 t 0062 4 75745266 BARD TROY G 0613 -00126 360.00 t 3o 0062 469721242 YARZEKA RICHARD A 0613 -00127 48 t 0063 471801203 ASHTON KATER I 0 0613- 00128 0000 t X f 0063 270483797 BLACK WILLIAM J 0613 -00129 0000 0063 471901502 BOYO JEFFREY A 0613 -00130 0.00 0063 474442474 BUNKE RICHARD H 0613 -00131 0.00 t X I 0063 476924605 CASSEDAY ELIZABETH J 0613 -00132 0.00 C x wer 0063 473684976 CA SSE DAY MARY K 0613 00133 0000 t x I 0063 466684857 CERNI US DAVID G 0613 -00134 0.00 t K f 0063 472844611 DALLU GE MATTHEW 0 0613- w00135 0.00 0063 470880293 DELMONT LISA M 0613 -00136 0.00 t X f 0063 474829219 DIEBEL -JERRY 0 061 3.00137 0.00 t X 1 y 0063'4Ti 884448 GALBR AITH MICHAEL D 0613 -00138 0.00 t x f 4 0063 476686996 HERBER KAR IN 1 0613- 00139 0.00 t x f 56 s7 YY: a.W_i•. M.w.•. w.. .1 r .•. •.. .. - •.r r.r . wa_ti v. .. rr w. • .. _ ate CITY OF MAPLEW0000 PAYROLL- CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 0011 CHECK DATE 06 -17 -83 PERIOD ENDING 06 -10 -83 PAGE 5 DEPT —NO EMPL —NO EMPLOYEE NAME CHECK•NO AMOUNT CLEARED L D063 474743915 KORTUS JAMES M 0613 -00140 D.00 t X' f 3 0063 4649C4615 KRUMM EL BECKY J 0613 -00141 0000 t X 1 0063 477829499 KRUMMEL R CGER C 0613 -00142 0001 t X >3 0063 469929687 KYRK JCOI A 0613 -00143 0.00 t X l 0063 474889823-'LANGELETT STEVEN E 0613 -00144 0000 t K I 0063 •469953553 •LA RKI N MCLLY A 0613 -00 0000 0063 473700729 NAHRE MICHELE A 0613 -00146 0.00 0063 473869923 MCCUL LON JULIE A 0613 -00147 0000 10 0063 MIHEL ICH C INDI L 0613 -00148 0.00 t X 0063 473903822 NIELS EN RONALD C 0613 -00149 0400 t X f 211 0063 476963902 PAULETTI ANTHONY A 0613 -00150 0000 t X 1 --0063 477629606 RASCMKE JEFFERY J 0613.00151 215.80 t f 1 0063 472986940 RICHI E STACY L 0613 -00152 0000 t X 1 0063 469927221 ROTH VTNCE C 0613 -00153 0000 t X n 0063 468946400 RYDEN DENISE 0613 -00154 0.00 X' f 17 0063 473686517 SANODUIST KATHRYN E 0613 -00155 O.UO t K 0063 477869067 SPANK BAUER DAWN M 0613-00156 0000 t X ! t •0063 469742645 SPANNBAUER KATHLEEN G 0613 -00157 -0900 t X 1 I•''0063 477920170 STRAUS LAURA J 0613 -00153 0.00 t K 1 211 0063 472821395 SULLIVAN NANCY J 0613 -00159 0000 t x f 2 y 0063 471528238 TATE PETER W 0613 -00160 0000 t X`, f 13 0063 470626422 TAUBMAN DOUGLAS J 0613 -00161 533.94 0063 477881708 THELL THOMAS L 0613 -00162 0000 t X 1 0063 475904189 TOWNLEY •MICHAEL F 0613 -00163 40.00 t 0063 475783041 VIETOR WEN 0Y L 061300164.0000 t X 1 0063 470 963203.WALLACE J ON T 0613 -00165 00 t X .1 rd 0063 475747042 WARD KERI L 0613 - 00166 0000 -X 0063 396324246 WARD R CY G 061 3 00167 257e50 0063 1 9047.24• * i 0064 151440508 GREW JANET M 0613 -00168 464.64 4i 0064 47/384624 HORSNELL JUDITH A 0613 - 00169 473.81 0064 474542163 SOUTTER CHRISTINE 0613 -00170 0000 t X 1 0064 938.4 5 -,.... 3!0071 389448993 CHLEBECK JUDY M 0613.00171 309.52 0071 4 705 405 51.OLSON GEOFFREY W 061 3 -00 1 72 7 39.66 t i r 0071 1 ,049.18 0072 477627178 EKSTR•ANO THOMAS G 0613.00173 478.17 4 '•M_0072 475608505 JO"NSON RANDALL L 0613 -00174 523.62 1.IR t 0072 1 9001079 0073 476090677 OSTROM MARJOR IE 0613 -00175 724.06 0073 724 *06 f 1 it 0074 381520776 WENGER ROBERT J 0613m00116 507.46 172 0074 50 7.4 6 COUNT 00176 GRAND TOTAL 575222-989 MEMORANDUM T0: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT /OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: City Manager Thomas Ekstrand-- Associate Planner Conditional Use Permit Renewal 2091 Hazelwood Street Donna Mundon Ceramic School Home occupation June 15, 1983 SUMMARY z Action by Council: Endorsed M dif i e d Rejected_._. Date Request Renewal of a ceramics school home occupation permit at 2011 Hazelwood. Comments All council requirements are being met. There have not been any complaints received in the last year. Recommendation ' renewingApprovaloftheenclosedresolution (page 5 g the Conditional Use Permit for a ceramic school home occupation at 2091 Hazelwood Street, on the basis that: 1. There have not been any complaints received in the last year. 2. Al 1 P revi ous conditions of -approval are being met. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Students shall park at John Glenn Junior High School. 2.One five-pound fi re. extinguisher shall be kept in the basement "classroom" area at All times. 3. Thi s P ermi t shall be reviewed by Council in five years. 4. Classes shall not be held more than three nights a week. Past Actions 3- 10 -77: Council approved the home occupation subject to: 1. The applicant is to instruct her students to ark i n the John GlennPJr.High parking lot. 2. The permit is to be annually reviewed. 8- 17 -78:Council renewed the ermi t for a fi v - 'P five year period, subject to: 1. Ceramics class students must park in the John G1 enn arki n l . oP9 t 2. One five -pound portable fire extinguisher shall be installed9stlled in the basement. 5- 20 -82: Council reconsidered this permit because of a oss i bl e noncomplianceiaPpncewiththerequirementtoparkintheJohnGlennJr. High parking lot. CouncilgP9directedstafftoperiodicallycheckthesiteoverthenextthreemonthstoassurecompliancewithCouncil's original conditions; if violations occur at an time put back on the Co y ethiscaseshouldbePCouncilagendaforreconsiderationofthepermit; allow three nights of ceramic classes; student arki n to be at John 'and the permit .to b P g Glenn, P e reviewed in one year. mb Enclosures I. Location Map ' 2. Property Line Map 3. Resolution N 2 _ C Q U N TY U) r W 41 U) Q ~ o z I W > EDGEHILL R W W d V) J fr cc a ~ Z DEMONT w AVE10 z C eRQOK AVE r - - 0 eov r . CD SE XTA NT AV DL:D GERVA GERVAI AVE. F` G ANDVIEW H _vctitNG SHERREN AVE G AVE.COPE - LARK AVE. sn LARK AYE• v LARK AVE. ' J N G s =o LAURIE RD- Z ¢ LAURIE RD. rCOUTYqa !1Oaaaz C r Q R O ZS = Ah tiURST z AYE. 5J 0 LEL ANO c Z a C \Z:./i > o Jut AvE P • cx AVE BU KE . AVE BU RKE aQ O kT L ELDRIDG E Av o - 4 in s' r W n 0E pN ,v w BELMON T r AV t; 64 QE > - cc SKI N 5 KILL MA N a I 1r HAR RIS 500 SKR ¢ nvE vs i ._ s,, Q ROSE wOOD AVE. RYA RY11AN ..h Q _ R Q t p R_ •PTV — ,. i 1q\- T 0 2322FROSTNAvEgn - N 7• • LC w F f N O N AVE. a J 4 5 oc v J Z SU MM FR AVE u t Q Q W • W a .= AVE. x cc O / , m cr •FRISSIE c A -GO nt = Q . z 2 m - --o -n. to Woke field e `a -=\ p so P H t o S T °- , := ke z 29Q _ SOP ,HIA, LS T. 6 W Z i zY = Z W a a o /e!1 = = =r c a 7 PRt CE AVf Gvv •.. Y J > Ll 2 ... a L A R P E NTEv '• to AVE --- air. -_vrrr r.. :: L FiFi I / go . (65 Attachment 1 LOCATION MAP 3 - Q C. AV E. 1 V . .} • ...... 4 z 4 ZS IC 2 2P, 2'+ 3C 31 32 M 13 12 r 1.4 ir W-1 5 -AN I r-, 8g s Zs a o t z G. 4'7tom' ? = _ L E 2091Y 4 Moo gp• 3 EZoe 15 too . ZOa* PL AN6 00 .'7 L t. 9 G. Lnr, S o Cic G oIo `. Ilk Cb t r ZCo i 3 8 j ZS ri Vic •.// Q 'j z I A 4 A 14 Attachment 2 PROPERTY LINE MAP 4 N 4 — Attachment 3 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council Chambers in said City on the 27th day of June, 1983 at 7:00 p.m. 0 The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Donna Mundon initiated a conditional use permit for a home occupation at the following- described property: Lot one, block one, Hazel Estates This property is also known as' 2091 Hazelwood Street, Mapl ewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by Donna Mundon, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. r 2. This conditional use permit was-originally approved by the Mapl ewood City Council on March 10,1977. 3. The Maplewood Council held a regular meeting on June 27, 1983 to re- consider this conditional use permit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described conditional use permit renewal be approved-on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. There have not been any complaints received in the last year. 2. All previous conditions of approval are being met. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Students shall park at John Glenn Junior High School. 2. One five-pound fire extinguisher shall be kept in the basement "class room" area at all times. 3. This permit shall be reviewed by the Council in five years. 410 Classes shall not be held more than three nights a week. Adopted this day of 1983. Seconded by Ayes -- 5 - STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersigned, being the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do h, the attached and foregoing extract of Maplewood, held on the 27th day my office, and the same is a full, as the same relates to z duly qualified and appoi nted C1 erk of the ereby certify that I have carefully compared of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of June, 1983 with the original on file in true and complete transcript therefrom insofar Witness my hand as such Clerk and thb corporate seal of the City if day of , 1983 City Clerk City c.f Maplewood, Minnesota 6- TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT /OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: z MEMORANDUM City Manager Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner Conditional Use Permit Renewal 2239 Hazelwood Street Charles and Betty Smith Horne Occupation--Cleaning Business June 20, 1983 SUMMARY 10tiOn by Counci . End ors e d Modi -'ied - Rei e ted Dat e Renewal of a conditional use _permit to operate a commercial cleaning business from the home. Refer to the applicant's letter, page 5. Comments All previous council conditions are being met and there have not been any complaints received. The future vehicle mentioned in the applicant's letter would be a 3/4 -ton van. This size vehicle would meet code requirements to be kept at the residence. i Recommendation Adoption of the enclosed resolution on page .6 approving a conditional use permit renewal for 2239 Hazelwood Street, on the basis that: 1. No complaints have been received regarding this home occupation. 2. All previous council conditions are being met. Approval is subject to the following conditions: Compliance with the criteria listed in Section 36 -66 (4) of the zoning ordinance. 2. Approval is granted for five years, after which time the applicant may apply for a renewal if the business has been compatible with the neighbor- hood and all conditions are being met. 3. No outdoor storage of business- related equipment and no vehicle with a load capacity greater than one ton shall be permitted. 4. There shall be a wall - mounted ten pound ABC fire exteinguisher located in the garage, easily accessi from the dwelling, when commercial products are stored in the walk-in foyer closet. BACKGROUND Past Action 6-14-82: Council approved a conditional use permit for a commercial cleaning business as a home occupation at 2239 Hazelwood Street, subject to: 1. Compliance with the criteria outlined in the Planning Commi ssri on Subcommittee report. 2. Approval is granted for one year, after which time the applicant may appl for a renewal if the business has been compatible with the neighborhood and all conditions are being met. 3. No outdoor storage of business - related equipment shall be permitted and no vehicle with a load capacity greater than one ton permitted. 4. There shall be a wall-mounted ten pound ABC fire extinguisher located in the garage, easily accessible from the dwelling, when .commercial products are stored in the walk-in foyer closet. Code Consideration i Section 36 -442 (e.) of the Zoning Code states that all conditional use permits shall be reviewed by the council within one year of the date of initial approval. At that review the council may specify an indefinite term or specific term, not to exceed five (5) years, for subsequent reviews. Paragraph g. requires that in the event the council in its review process decides to consider imposing additional conditions or termination of a conditional use permit, the city council shall hold at least one public hearing on that permit. mb Enclosures 1. Location Map 20 Property Line Map 3. Letter dated 5-2-83 4. Resolution 2- C - p • f.. A IV., 4, lo RADA7Z 71 o Qw 3 KOHLMAN AVE.KOHLMAN AVE j // a z IDUNTYROAD •C IV)Or JL P WD U)C r ui ujl JEDGEHILL RD. Iui V); Z V) Q \ z J J i v ' - ' DE MONT A VE W L 1 Lt 00K L:AVE.2 [E CD cr BROOKS m:j 61 Ir I Ix <. r C ' th AVE.LLSEXITANTAV rZERVAIS GERVAIS AVEJ/ AVE. G 36 WA N DVIEW = SHERREN A v;r I f I T COPE E ..... 4a COPE AVE.3 D LARK AVE . ir 1 0-: 1 -LAR AVE. LARK25 L k e i I . LAU E <C 0 UNT Ycl zLA =URIE W17CsaRD. wer AN irN:D]25 - C) Cr F — z "iuz 0 JUNCTIONJ ---- A — .f 64 Q a j 0 RYA CD ROSE"! 1* 0 OD=)) AVE R Y Z8xFROS0Tj 0-u)AVE u) u) w U) U) co 28 IL z FE N T . 0 N AVE < Win 4ujSUMMERAVE 0: FRISBIE ir zILz dd LRIPLEY AVE m 4 T W Ir Wokefield p SD PH IA ST. -J 0 - A, M Ir j — Co 4 41 u = Lok e 2 47 SOP -HIA S T. z z D f z z i I PRf GD62z & L LA !!-Pj LE N T E U LR -AVE - ST. PA L t • Soo 1 Y 150 O IP Y AVE U) AV JIFP07 X A z!! Attachment One LOCATION MAP U i - 4r I vz SAN AV S K VE S H R AVE.L___j M 4 1 ELDRIDG E AVE 12E - L MON L A U SKILLMA N m AVE 3:1 Bu LKF-I A VE AVE ! -% I IU) I 4 t - - . - . • _ - ! T' _. - = _ - _I j T _ - ate--- --r •+- _, I tt ' i L `f'N.vEif'T LR.4 z r ! I J _ 2 2 5 LARK AV LNUE . I -'" ' `y I- 111 1 t1 f ! .: 2 2 3S. 1– -;- — L _ j- _ ! 1536 1 J 2240 i 2229 lZ 777-71 y r r - Y ON r 1 I r - 77 - 6 33 27 t T - t l t - - . - . • _ - ! T' _. - = _ - _I j T _ - ate--- --r •+- _, I tt ' i L `f'N.vEif'T LR.4 z r ! I J _ 2 2 5 LARK AV LNUE . I -'" ' `y I- 111 1 t1 f ! .: 2 2 3S. 1– -;- — L _ j- _ ! 1536 1 J 2240 i 2229 lZ 777-71 y r r - Y ON r 1 I r - 77 - L • 1p Attachment Two PROPERTY LINE MAP k 4 _ 4 T - L • 1p Attachment Two PROPERTY LINE MAP k 4 _ 4 1 1 AY u f - -. 004 Ir JL Irylbo- or s- i 1 r i i i 1 J i e `!1 G 4 C V 5 t- w J IlliPt / n. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City C f 9 Y ouncl o the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly calleded and held i n the CouncilChambersin-said City on the day of 1983, -83, at 7..00 p.m. The following members were present: Th following members were absent: WHEREAS, Charles and Betty Smith initiated a conditional use permit for ahomeoccupationatthefollowing-described property: Lots l and 2, Block 8, plus the north half of the adjacent vacated alley, Sabi Addition to Gladstone. This property is also known as 2239 Hazelwood Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history this conditional use P ermi t is as follows: 1. This conditional use .permit was initiated by Charles and BettySmith, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was original approved b the CityYPPYyCouncilonJune14, 1982, subject to the following conditions: a. Compliance with the criteria outlined in the Pl anri i n CommissionComission Subcommi ttee report. b. Approval is granted for one after which time the a 1 i canPP t may apply for a renewal if the business has been compatible with the neighborhood and all conditions, are being met. c. No outdoor storage of business-related equipment shall be permittedandnovehiclewithaloadcapacitygreaterthanonetonPermitted. d. There shall be a wall-mounted ten pound ABC fire extinguisherlocatedinthegarage, easi accessible from the dwelling, when commercial products are stored in the walk -in foyer closet. 3. The Maplewood City . Council held a regular meeting 1983 to consider this conditional use permit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described conditional use permit be approved, on the basis of the followingfindingsoffact. 1. No complaints have. been received regarding this home occ:u' 'P ati on. 2. All • previous council conditions are being met. Approval is subject to the following conditions: I. Compliance with the criteria listed i n Section 36-66(4) of the Zoning ordinance. 2. Approval is granted for five years , after which time the a 1 i cant mayyapplyforarenewalifthebusinesshasbeencompatiblewiththe neighborhood and all conditions are being met. z 3. No outdoor storage of business - related equipment shall be permitted and no vehicle with a load capacity greater than one ton permitted. 4. There shall be a wall-mounted ten pound ABC fire extinguisher located in the garage, easily accessible from the dwelling, when commercial products are stored in the walk-in foyer closet. Adopted this day of 21983. Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD } I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appi rated Cl erk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular- meeting of the City of Maplewood, held -on the day of , 1983, with the original on f i l e in my office, and the same is a full, true and - complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of , 1983. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota RAMSEY COUMY RAMSEY COUNTY PARKS& RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1850 White Bear Avenue Telephone (612) 777.1361 St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 Anthony J. Crea, Director Bernard L. Edmonds, Asst. Director June 10, 1983 Action by Ce1- - cal: Mr. Barry Evans Endorsed . Manager YRodifi City of Maplewood Rejected-1380 Frost Avenue Ma p lewood, Minnesota 55109 Date Re: Agreement for Wakefield Park Dear Mr. Evans: A search of our records fail to reveal any evidence of a permit agreement for the use of a portion of Wakefield Park by the City of Maplewood for municipal recreation purposes. It would appear to me that an agreement would be in the best interest of both the City and County so that each department will understand the responsibilities and restrictions of their jurisdiction. The enclosed agreement was prepared with language similar to the Afton Heights Park agreement. Will you please review the matter and if you agree with the language place it before the City Council for approval . If you have questions about the language, I would appropriate your suggestions. After the City acts on the agreement, I will place it before the County Board for approval. Sincerely, nthony J. Crea Director AJC: j jh Enclosure c. c. Robert Odegard 1 PERMIT BETWEEN RAMSEY COUNTY AND CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DATED: , 1983 1. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. Ramsey County (the county) grants to the City of Maplewood, a municipal corporation of the State --of Minnesota the City), the exclusive right to use, enjoy and control the following described premises: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THAT PART OF WAKEFIELD PARK USED BY THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, subject to streets, beginning at the northwest corner of the southeast 1/4 of Sec. 15, T. 29, R. 22, thence southerly along the west line of said southeast 1/4 530 feet, thence easterly parallel with north line of said SE 1/4 170 feet, thence southerly parallel with west line of said SE 1/4 230 feet thence easterly parallel with north line of said SE 1/4 100 feet, thence northerly parallel with the west line of said SE 1/4 230 feet 230 feet, thence easterly parallel with north line of said SE 1/4 to the centerline of Prosperity Road, thence northerly along centerline of Prosperity Road to a point on the north l i n e of said SE 1/4, thence westerly along north line of said SE 1/4 to the point of beginning for recreation and for community use by all of the people of Ramsey County. 2. TERM. This permit is for a term of 25 years beginning on the date of execution but may be terminated upon one year notice by either party. 3. PERMIT CHARGES. The county shall make no charge for this permit. 4. ASSIGNABILITY. The City shall not assign this permit. 5. PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION. Before making any changes or improve- ments, the City shall submit a master plan of the premises, including a complete layout for use of areas, possible play equipment, anticipated utilities, grading and identification of plantings to the Ramsey County Executive Director for approval. His approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. The Ramsey County Executive Director must approve all diviations from the original plan. As part of the approved plan, the City may attach fixtures or signs and erect fixtures or structures in or upon the premises, all of which shall be the property of the county. 1- i:'_.. `J: "^'. .a ?'_a1_•r. v,p„fw ti•. ... !: : '.. _.. ...frL ^ aP.'v`Ct":: 1Wp•• w r .. s. .•1.. o.. a..w r..i_f, w- ...C.'rY. q - ,? _ .` .- ......,.: .• ywy. A C k r^ s N^ sir.. t. ate. i } el . \'R =:.;: <.•ti.C' .._.- •.fir -. i r fix. :::,:...... ....,.. _ Ei '4•` i' j .. .... .... p i ••(• 'f wt r 6. MAINTENANCE OF PREMISES. The City shall maintain the premises and property furnished under this permit. Good repair and tenantable condition during the period of this permit in accordance with good park maintenance practices. The Ramsey County Executive Director shall approve all commonly accepted environmental intrusions. The City shall see to it that all utilities and wires are placed underground. 7. USE BY OTHERS. Each agreement between the City and-a third party for the use, occupancy or enjoyment of the premises is subject to the approval of the Director of the Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department. 8. ASSESSMENTS. The City shall pay all assessments levied against the premises. 9. INDEMNIFICATION. The City shall indemnify the county and save it harmless from any and all claims for damage which the county may be required to pay for injury or damage caused through the negligence of the City or any of its agents or employees by virtue of its operation and control of the premises. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION By Assist - ant County Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION By ttorney for the City of Maplewood ft RAMSEY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS By Commissioner Schaber, Chairman By Harry E. Marshall, Chief Clerk CITY OF MAPLEW00D 2- By ayor By -_ Clerk PERMIT BETWEEN RAMSEY COUNTY AND CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DATED: , 1983 1. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. Ramsey County (the county) grants to the City of Maplewood, a municipal corporation of the State`of Minnesota the City), the exclusive right to use, enjoy and control the following 1 described premises: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THAT PART OF WAKEFIELD PARK USED BY THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, subject to streets, beginning at the northwest corner of the southeast 1/4 of Sec. 15, T. 29, R. 22, thence southerly along the west line of said southeast 1/4 530 feet, thence easterly parallel with north line of said SE 1/4 170 feet, thence southerly parallel with west line of said SE 1/4 230 feet thence easterly parallel with north line of said SE 1/4 100 feet, thence northerly parallel with the west l i n e of said SE 1/4 230 feet 230 feet, thence easterly parallel with north line of said SE 1/4 to the centerline of Prosperity Road, thence northerly along centerline of Prosperity Road to a point on the north line of said SE 1/4, thence westerly along north line of said SE 1/4 to the point of beginning for recreation and for community use by all of the people of Ramsey County. 2. TERM. This permit is for a term of 25 years beginning on the date of execution but may be terminated upon one year notice by either party. 3. PERMIT CHARGES. The county shall make no charge for this permit. 4. ASSIGNABILITY. The City shall not assign this permit. 5. PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION. Before making any chances or improve- ments, the City shall submit a master plan of the premises, including a complete layout for use of areas, possible play equipment, anticipated utilities, grading and identification of plantings to the Ramsey County Executive Director for approval. -His approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. The Ramsey County Executi?e Director must approve all diviations from the original plan. As part of the approved plan, the City may attach fixtures or signs and erect fixtures or structures in or upon the premises, all of which shall be the property of the county. 1- 6. MAINTENANCE OF PREMISES. The City shall maintain the premises and property furnished under this permit. Good repair and tenantable condition during the period of this permit in accordance with good park maintenance practices. The Ramsey County Executive Director shall approve t all commonly accepted environmental intrusions. The City shall see to it that all utilities and wires are placed underground. 7. USE BY OTHERS. Each agreement between the City and a third party for the use, occupancy or enjoyment of the premises is subject to the approval of the Director of the Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department. 8. ASSESSMENTS. The City shall pay all assessments levied against the premises. 9. INDEMNIFICATION. The City shall indemnify the county and save it harmless from any and all claims for damage which the county may be required to pay for injury or damage caused throuqh the negligence of the City or any of its agents or employees by virtue of its operation and control of the premises. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION RAMSEY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS By By Assistant County Attorney Commissioner Schaber, Chairman By Harry E. Marshal 1, Chief Clerk CITY OF MAPLEWOOD APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION By Mayor By By Attorney for the Ci ty of Clerk Maplewood 2- r Action by Cou. -c I.: MEMORANDUM ` Endorsed—_... _. Modif Rejected- Date ._ TO: Mayor & City Council r FROM: Barry R. Evans, City Manage SUBJECT: Budget Appropriation _ DATE: June 20, 1983 We have received a grant of two hundred thirty two dollars ($232.) from the State Department of Energy, .P1 anni ng and Development - after a good deal of nagging on their part. They want us to take this money and use it to place a newspaper ad advising Maplewood residents of their ability to obtain an energy audit of their homes from N . S . P . for $10, They also want community support so the North Maplewood Lions Club and the N. St. Paul - Maplewood Rotary have agreed to endorse the advertisement. In any case, in order to use the money which they have given us, Council action to appropriate the money to the proper account is needed. I would recommend that you take that action. BRE :1nb r June 10, 1983 MEMORANDUM Action b CouzI To: City Manager Barry Evans Endorsed From: Chief of Police Kenneth V. Collins Modifie Subject: Budget Transfer Request Rejected Dat e We are currently in the process of administering our authorized Police Officer and Sergeant examinations and find that sufficient money was not budgeted to cover the expenditure. I am requesting $975 be transferred from the Contingency Fund to the Police Civil Service Commission to complete this process. KVC:js cc Budget File Civil Service File Dan Faust a r 7 I it Ok GET TRANSFER REQUEST* Amount 8U ( Round -off to nearest $5) From: Fund Title O\ , Budget Code 'O \ - y To; Fund Title Budget Code flt Tnnnc%r _ Y%-\ Q- o T11gTTrTr A rTnrT . DEPARTMENT HEAD ACTION: Approval Disapproval Dat4,jb,7) Initials FINANCE DIRECTOR ACTION; Approval Disapproval Date Initials CITY MANAGER ACTION: Revision to Disapproved Date Initials A BUDGET TRANSFER WILL BE MADE 3 DAYS AFTER APPROVAL BY THE FINANCE DIRECTOR UNLESS REVISED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE CITY MANAGER. This form should not be used for budget transfer requests which require City Council approval and which are the following: a. Transfers of amounts greater than $1,000. b. Transfers between departments: Transfers between funds. RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A HOSPITAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA. MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF*A NOTICE OF SAID HEARING WHEREAS, - a) Chapter 474, Mi*nesota.Statutess known as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (the"Act") gives muni - - cipalities the power =to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of the encouragement and development of economically sound.industryp and commerce to prevent so far as possible. the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; b) The.City Counci . of the City of Maplewood ( "City") has received from Health Resources Hospital Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the "Corporation ") a that the City assist in financing aproposal • throu h the .project hereinafter described, g issuance of its industrial revenue bonds (the Bonds ") pursuant to the .pct; c) Be fore roceeding with considerp ation of the request of the Corporation is necessary for the City to hold* a public l hearing on the proposal pursuant to Section 474.O1, 7b, Minnesota Statutes; O THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council ofNW, the City ..of 'Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows 1. A Public Hearing on said proposal of the Corpo will be held at the time and place set forth in the Notice of Hearing hereto attached. I 2. The general nature of the proposal and an estimate of the principal amount of bonds to be issued to finance the proposal are described in. the form of Notice of Hearing hereto attached* 3. The Notice of said Public Hearing shall be in. s s -a -llubtanti the. form contained in. the Notice hereto attached.y 40 A draft copy of the proposed application to the Commissioner of Energy,.Planning and State of Minnesota; for - approval of the project, together with proposed forms of all attachments . and exhibits thereto, is on f ile in the of f ice of the City Clerk . 5. The City Clerk is hereby -authorized and directed - to cause notice of said hearing to be given one publication in the official newspaper and a newspaper of general circulation available in the City, not less than 15 days nor more than 30 days prior to the date fixed . for said hearing, as shown in theyP notice of hearing hereto attached. - Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this 27th day of June, 1983. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A HOSPITAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT To whom it may concern: Notice is hereby iven that the City Council. of theY City of Maplewood, Minnesota will meet. at the City Hall in .the City of Maplewood, Minnesota at . * M. on July 25 1983 , to the proposal of Health Resources Hospital Corporation,cons p p . that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter described by the issuance of hospital revenue bonds. Description of Project The proposed.project shall consist of the acquisition of land and the construction and equipping thereon of an approximate 112,000 square foot acute care hospital ' and related health-care facilities to be Located at the Northeast. corner of Beam and Hazelwood in the City of Maplewood, and to refinance certain existing debt of the Corporation and to renovate.. the Corporation s existing hospital. The estimated principal amount of bonds . or other obli -- gations to be issued to finance this project is $53,000, Said bonds or other obligations if. and when. issued will not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance upon any property of the City except the project and such bonds or obli -- 8 ations will not be-a charge against the City's general credit or taxing powers but are payable from sums to be paid by Health Resources Hospital Corporation pursuant to a revenue agreement. draft copy of the proposed application to the Com- missioner of Energy, Planning and Development, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together with all attachments ' and exhibits thereto, is available for public inspection beginning July 6 , 198.3 from 9:00 a . m. to 4:30 Monday through Friday, at the City Hall. in Maplewood, Minnesota. At the time and place fixed for said Public Hearing the City Council of the City of Maplewood will give all persons w Pphoap at the hearing an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal. Dated this 27th day of BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL.) By L/ Aurelius City 'Clem The assessment roll for the above - referenced project is herewith presented for the City Council's consideration. The roll has been prepared in accordance with current City assessment policy and assessments are proposed to be levied against all benefited properties within the project area. Endo rsea Yod.ifie TO: City Manager Re j e c d _._.. FROM: Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Crestview Drive - Hudson Place, Water main extension Project No. 82 -19 DATE: June 17, 1983 Project costs have been estimated using the low bidders p Inc.) for construction costs and then adding the indirect projections since actual costs. are unknown at this time. have been added to the construction costs are as follows: gencies at 5.00/, Engineering and Administrative Costs at laneous Costs for Legal, Fiscal, etc. at 1.24 %. Action by cccl1: roposal (C.W. Houle, costs based on cost Indirect costs that Construction Contin- 24.76% and Miscel- The following financing proposal which the assessment are based on considers both a special assessment levy and City participation. The City participation would offset the total cost of constructing the 12 -inch diameter water main along Hudson Place between McKnight Road and Crestivew Drive and the oversizing cost (from 8 -inch diameter to 12 -1*nch diameter) along Hudson Place between Crestview Drive and Sterling Street. The assessment costs are associated with the individual water services, the 8 -inch water main and restoration on Crestview Drive from Hudson Pl to the cul-de- and the equivalent cost of an 8 -inch. diameter water main and restoration along Hudson Place between Crestview Drive and Sterling Street. HYDRANT CHARGE FUND The hydrant charge fund was established in October, 1976 when the 1977 budget was adopted. This fund is used to account for the use of fire protection charges that went into affect July 1, 1977. The charges are levied against all properties within the St. Paul Water Utility Service District where hydrants are located. This charge is on a quarterly basis against properties whether or not they are connected to the city's water system. Revenues from the hydrant charges are used to improve, operate and maintain that portion of the city's water system that is connected to the St. Paul Water Utility, and used to finance the unassessed portions of the construction of major water systems improvements such as .elevated water tanks, booster stations and trunk water main facilities. The fund balance has experienced a constant growth pattern due to income exceeding expenditures in its early years. This is primarily due to the fact that while charges were started in 1977, annual transfers from the fund to the debt service requirements did not start until 1980. In addition, the operation and maintenance costs for the core facilities were comparatively low i n p revi ous years because these facilities had not yet obtained full operational status. The City has been able to realize approximately 12% on investments made on the retained earnings from the fund. As a result of the relatively low expenditures and a reasonable rate of return on investments, the fund has been able to increase its balance to $ as of December 31, 1982. The City participation of $100,600.00 on Project 82 -19 is proposed by means of a direct withdrawal from the Hydrant Funa Balance. The effect of this reduction in the fund would cause a near equal balance between income and expenditures due to the loss in revenue from a decrease inn interest income. Any YCit p articipation.in addition to the $100,600.00 should be financed by means of revenue bonds and amortized under debt service. It should be noted, however, that for each $50,000.00 of increased debt service that the Hydrant Charges must be increased by 4.3/ (on a typical S.F. residential dwelling the H.C. woul d increase by $0.43/YR). The City Council should be aware that within the next few months that the McKnight Road trunk water main and elevated tank improvements will be heard and that preliminary estimates reveal a need for City cost participation of approximately $550,000.00. This participation would be by means of an increase in the hydrant charges of about 47.7% or $4.77/YR for residential customers. Attached is Table No. 1 which delineates Expenditures projected to the year 1986. withdrawal in 1983 for Project 82-19. the Hydrant Fund Revenues vs. The table assumes a $100,600.00 mb CRESTVIEW DRIVE- HUDSON PLACE WATERMAIN EXTENSION MAPLEWOOD PROJECT NO. 82 -19 PROJECT COSTS Construction Cost with Contingencies $185,161.75 Engineering and Administrative 45 Miscellaneous 2 TOTAL PROJECT COST Total Assessments Total City Participation (Hydrant Fund) ASSESSMENT RAT AND COST RECOVERY Water Main 3 FF @ $38.90/FF Water Services 0" Diameter) 21 Services @ $860.64 /Service 242 141 ,932.21 100,629.69 123,858.77 18,073.44 TOTAL'141,932.21 HYDRANT CHARGE FUND TABLE 1 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985. 1986 EXPENDITURES Actual Act Act UA Act. Budget Projected Operation & Maint. 6 ,777 I8 J4y e`+ 4y J I ' G ''`' J '''' " 77 ? 710 77,710 77,710 77,710 Debt Service 77 77 77Det Replacement of 21 21 21 21 Exist. Facil. -_ Subt. (:expenses) 6 18 1029059 108,943 131 160 165 1709710 176 REVENUE Charges 112 115 1199668 119 122 126 129 132 135 Connection Chgs. -- 9 -' -- -- - Interest & Other 6,819 21 931.4 35 46 031 48 56 38 39 39,300 Subt. (revenue)1195343 1459705 155,262 165 605 171 182 167,950 1715200 174 Net increase /decrease in fund balance 127,356 53 56 Hydrant Charge Fund 161 288,505 341 398 39,600 22 2 490 - 2 432 370 354 356 3575031 3545821 Assuming 100,600.00 direct withdrawal for 82 -19. I to I IRV - - r; c 7 ' t c n . B 1 c L f f `' t t h : s l ft u - : •t; it 2 IN 1 f • 4 ter. __ n ---'-_ p 59 CRS 4 97110 IV Ir CK Al 10 3 C 140/ f 1 . 2a ti . - . , ( ., ,318 - Z ju 1 1 \ 4 Crestview Drive Proposed Assessment Frontage Watermain Imp. iF82 --19 Feb 83 rr. ...r r......r. .....r .... r.++....•+..r r fr••. rr...ti.t.r -r -' -- -- - wY....r +.r.rr. -..r r ....r ter .... r ...ter -. -.- ..r - ..r +.•. _ .r.i -_ _ _. _ ....r .s.r.r.....r..+_r.+«..r.- .. -rr..r -. PROJ. 82 -19 CRESTVIEW DR. i HUDSON PL. WATERMAIN WATER MAIN P.F.@ $ 38.900 1 "WATER SERV.@ $ 860.640 PARCEL NUMBER i**AA # # # #A #1 i2 3 A ** * *4 5 6 PARCEL CODE_ NUMBER 57 -00109-020-27 , - - 57-00100=140--.2-5- 32188- 01L-0L 57-32100- 020- 0L___53•• 32100 - 030- 01r- --ST -- 31100- 040 -0 -- WA`fER - MAIN F.F.415.000 171.760 160.000 150.000 150.000 150.000 s WATER MAIN ASSMT.16143.500 6681.464 6224.000 5835.000 5835.000 5835.000 jl "WATER SERV.1.000 1- 090 1.800-1000 I*WATER'SERV.ASSMT.860.640 1 860.640 860.640 860.640 860.640 860.640 to iTOTAG ASSESSMENT ter- ---- -- --rrrrrrr-- 17004.140 rrrrrrr. rrrr - ------ rrrrrrr 7542.104 rrrrr. ---r. ---- 7084.640 r------------- -rrrr---- 6695.640 6695.640 rrrr-rrrrrr- rrrrrrr 6695.640 rrrrrrr-- --- PARCEL NUMBER: _ •7 8 •9 10 11 12 7PARCEL CODE NUMBER 57- 32100 - 050 -01 57- 32100 - 011 -02 57- 32100- 020 -02 57- 32100- 030 -02 57- 32100 - 040 -02 57- 32100- 050 -02 WATER MAIN F.F.155.160.000 150.000.150.000_._._130 -.000 WATER MAIN ASSMT 160 6035.724 6224.000 5835.000 5835.000 5835.000 5057.000 y I,1 "WATER SERV.1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 4'1 "WATER SERV.ASS 868 640 860.690z... - - ~860.640 860.640 - -'86e.860:640 - TOTAG ASSESSMENT rrrrrrr -r.. rrrrr- rrr.rrww- 6896.364 wr..r- -- .i.r.. rrrrr 7084.640 r- rrrrrr..... - w. -so 6695.640 00 rrrr- • 6695.640 6695.640 5917.640 7 r rw rrr 00 r.rr -r Wr rww•.rw00 rrrrr -r W 00 rr wwwr,w r- r- - 1NUMBER. TAl2CEG E NUMBER MAIN F.F. 57 32110 011 -03 100.000 57 32110 032 - 03 238.170 57 32110 - 051 - 03 101.000 57 32110 060 - 03 107.000 57 32110 070 - 03 106.000 57 32110 - 080 - 03 100.000 MATER MAIN ASSM 3890.0A0 813_3928_900.. --4.162 300-4- 123.400- -- - 10890.000- ---- WATER SERV. WATER SERV.ASSMT. 1.000 9Z64 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 7 DOTAL ASSESSMENT 860.640 860.640 10125.453 .__...._..___ 860.640 4789. 540....-- 860.640 5022 - ..940. - - -- 860.640 4984.040 - 860.640 4750 -.640 -- tr.vrrrrrr -r-rr. rrrrr. vrrr F PARCEG NUMBER. 47 rrrrrr . rrrr . .rrrrrrrw--- 19 rr- - - --r- rrrrrr- 20 rrrrrrrrr .rr.•.rr- rrrrrrrrrrrw- 21 rrrrrr rrrrrrr-- ..r..rrr.•rrrr--rr- .•.rr -..•rr 7 dPARCELCODE__ NUMBER_ WA - MAINTtR F.F. MAIN ASSMT. 100.000 100.000 139.940 WATER 3890.0.00 3890.000 5443.666 4 "WATER SERV.1 .000 1.000.____.__L.00A .__ - '• 1 " WATER SERV.ASSMT.860.640 860.640 860.640 TOTAL ASSESSMEI.7T r r r r r r r r r r r r r r- r r r r r r 4750.640 r r r r r r r- r r r -------- 4750.640 6304. 306 A i_. PROJECT SUMMARY PROJ. 82 -19 CRESTVIEW DR..6 HUDSON PL. WATERMAIN l?, 1) 021 PARCELS ASSESSED. i'OTAL WATER MAIN F.F.3184.030 @ $ * * ** **38.900 EACH =TOTAL WATER MAIN ASSMT. $*123858.77 TOTAL 1"WATER SERV. _ * * * * *_* *21.000 @...$_ *. * *. *. *860.640 EACH =TOTAL..1."WATEB SERV. ASSMT--- .-- • - -$ *a 18073-.44 -' - -- -' TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED 141932.21 h i yJ Alerrcf 05 /e/ ID. 57- 00100- 020 -27 ASSMT.NO . 5368 CHRIST METHODIST CHURCH 2500 HUDSON RD S7 PAUL MN 55119 I0. 57- 00100- 140-27 ASSNT. NO . 5-.368 CHARLES 8 IRENE FERRISE 170 CRESTVIEW DR ST PAUL MINN 55119 i ID. 57- 32100 - 030 -01 i ASSMT . NO . 5368 WI LF R E O L MUIR ET AL 212 CRESTVIEW DR ST PAUL MIN 55119 cr ID. 57-32100-040-01 ASSMT . NO . 5368 ROBERT J DEANNA P OLIVEIRA r 200 CRESTVIEW DRIVE ST PAUL .MN 55119 G D E DISSELKAMP ET AL 188 CRESTVIEW DR ST PAUL MIN 55119 I0. 57-32100-011-02 ASSMT . NO. 5368 REV S G JESSIE A NORRIS 235 CRESTVIEW DRIVE ST PAUL MINN 55119 8 ID. 57- 32100 - 020 -02 ASSMT . NO . 5368 GE RA LD F GRANT ET AL 221 CRESTVIEW DRIVE ST PAUL MINN 55119 J ID. 57- 32100- 030 -02 ASSMT . NO . 5368 MI LDR ED KL OS 215 CRESTVIEW DRIVE ST PAUL MINN 55119 ID. 57. 32100 - 040 -02 ASSMT . NO . 5368 JOHN C L RAMONA J GREA VU 187 CRESTVIEW DRIVE ST PAUL MN 55119 J' ID. 57- 32100 - 050 -02 ASSMT.NO. 5368 JOHN C RA MONA J GREA VU 187 CRESTVIEW DR ST PAUL MN 55119 ID. 57- 32110- 011-03 ASSMT.NO. 5368 GENE T SHIRLEY M KULZER 152 CRESTVIEW DRIVE ST PAUL MN 55119 3 ID,* 57-32100-Oil-01 r ASSMT.NO. 5368 WILLIAM A ZA PPA J R & DEBORAH A VOGELGESANG 230 CRESTVIEW DR ST -PAUL MN 55119 r ID. 57-32100'020-01 ASSMT.NO. 5368 THOMAS J BERRY ET AL 222 CRESTVIEW DRIVE ST PAUL MINN 55119 i ID. 57- 32100 - 030 -01 i ASSMT . NO . 5368 WI LF R E O L MUIR ET AL 212 CRESTVIEW DR ST PAUL MIN 55119 cr ID. 57-32100-040-01 ASSMT . NO . 5368 ROBERT J DEANNA P OLIVEIRA r 200 CRESTVIEW DRIVE ST PAUL .MN 55119 G D E DISSELKAMP ET AL 188 CRESTVIEW DR ST PAUL MIN 55119 I0. 57-32100-011-02 ASSMT . NO. 5368 REV S G JESSIE A NORRIS 235 CRESTVIEW DRIVE ST PAUL MINN 55119 8 ID. 57- 32100 - 020 -02 ASSMT . NO . 5368 GE RA LD F GRANT ET AL 221 CRESTVIEW DRIVE ST PAUL MINN 55119 J ID. 57- 32100- 030 -02 ASSMT . NO . 5368 MI LDR ED KL OS 215 CRESTVIEW DRIVE ST PAUL MINN 55119 ID. 57. 32100 - 040 -02 ASSMT . NO . 5368 JOHN C L RAMONA J GREA VU 187 CRESTVIEW DRIVE ST PAUL MN 55119 J' ID. 57- 32100 - 050 -02 ASSMT.NO. 5368 JOHN C RA MONA J GREA VU 187 CRESTVIEW DR ST PAUL MN 55119 ID. 57- 32110- 011-03 ASSMT.NO. 5368 GENE T SHIRLEY M KULZER 152 CRESTVIEW DRIVE ST PAUL MN 55119 3 NJJ 1'i ! • 111U • J 00 JOHN B 6 Lt1 MER ET AL . H P tEMBiCZAK f 175 CRESTVIEW OR WARREN H ROBENS ST PAUL MIN 55119 140 CRESTVIEW DRIVE N ST PAUL MN 55119 LABEL PRINTED 00021 ID. 57- 32110 - 051 -03 ASSMT • NO • 5368 MARVIN D MARCIA L LI NDSETH 7.097 I RVIN AVE S COTTAGE GROVE MN 55 016 s 4150 ID• 57- 32110 - 060 -03 ASSMT •NO • 5368 JOSEPH W BOLAND ET AL 131 CRESTVIEW DRIVE ST PAUL MINN 55119 ID• 57 -32110 - 070 -03 ASSMT • NO • 5368 GARY N SHERBURNE ET AL 137 CRESTVIEW DRIVE ST fAUL MN 55119 17 ID • 57-32110-080-03 t ASSMT • NO • 5368 DOLORES ROSS 147 CRESTVIEW DRIVE N ST PAUL MN 55119 ID• 57- 32110 - 090 -03 ASSMT • NO . 5368 HAROLD D SHANE ET AL 155 CRESTVIEW DRIVE N ST PAUL MINN 55119 100 57- 32110 - 100 -03 ASSMT .NO • 5368 JOSEPH F MARIE E THERA 165 CRESTVIEW DRIVE ST PAUL MINN 55119 z/ RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the construction of Crestview Drive- Hudson Place - Watermain Extension as described in the files of the City Clerk as Project Number 82 -19, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included i s hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 19 years; the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January, 1984, and shall bear interest at the rate of 12 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1983. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council to reimburse i tse'l f in the future for the. portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions re- lating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 4. To the extent that this improvement benefits non- abutting properties which may be served by the improvement when one or.more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council , as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the City be adding any.portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements . 56 The Clerk s.hal 1 forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor of be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT /OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: City Manager Thomas Ekstrand Garage Height Variance 762 Mary Street Robert D. Schwan 2nd Story Garage Addition May 11, 1983 SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL Action by Council: Endorse Mo dif i e d_ R e j e c t e d-- ._ Date Request Approval of a variance to add a second story addition onto an existing garage. Proposal 1. Refer to the enclosed sketches and letter dated 4 -8 -83. 2. The existing garage is built into a hill in the back yard. 3. The addition would be for storage space. CONCLUSION U111111C1 I L' The intent of the one -story height limitation is to keep garages proportionate to the house and adjacent development. In this instance, the garage is set far enough back behind the house that it would not be easily visible from the street. Also, there are no residential neighbors behind this lot who would object to the increase in garage height. Recommendation Ado P ti on of the resolution approving a variance for a second -story garage addition at 762 Mary Street. Approval is'based on the finding that the two-story garage would not impact surrounding development, because of its concealed location toward the rear of the property, and also due to the absence of residential development behind the site. MEMORANDUM urltanvuiru Site Description 1. Lot size:* 16,950 square feet 2. Existing Use: single dwel and garage Surrounding Land Uses Single dwellings on the north, west and south. Union Cemetery on--the east. DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS Pl anni ng 1. Land Use Plan designation: RL, low density residential 2. Zoning: R-1, residence district (single d w e l l i n g ) 3. Ordinance No. 502 of the Zoning Code states that private garages may not exceed one story in height. 4. Statutory requirements: State law requires that the following fi ndi gigs be made before a variance can be granted: a. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardshi.p because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. b. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in questions cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner i s. due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the vari if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Building official Comply with the Uniform Building Code. Ci ti zen Comments The neighbor to the north, who would be most affected by the addition, has no objections. PROCEDURE 1. Planning Commission recommendation. 2. City Council holds a public hearing . A majority vote i required for approval. r.b Enclosures: 1. Location Map 2. Pro erty Line Map 3. Bui ding elevations - -side view 4. Building elevations - -front view 5. Applicants letter dated 4 -8 -83 6. Resolution Z - 1 Trailer Court Private) E. MARYLAND 32 O am i96 MATCH LINE 1570> 34 AVE. IVY J AVE, 120 pYE s NOV r . RYf STER I AC 4 Yid i too 1 iZ9.15 s0 00 a 124,15 - i? 5 ^ , Z O 4 , tZ •6% r W 40 N 0 i `(' \' 1, _ 4 6 S 3a 3Th go 8 J a 24 NV o b NI v Go ' 0I Z lo 00 0 10 c L ? 'fit+ ft c , J o . sue 7 0 / s 4 O 1 75 3 s G S 0 f- 4 gr S "?5 90 10 to 'A N o °s- obo ...... AM , o 17 99 410.41 i 1 G 9 i1 r - iT r Union Cemetery 1 27'S 8 i 1 --,-_ ' Garagesa50 , 37ac s9 6 i C3 to 15 LA uft ' r 100 a ,10 T f! 14 . 12 1 :4 - 111. AO J O 1 __ 31 .5 - • , to.9b 'ib 501 1 a jp 30 W7 • ° ' ?8 _ ---- — — . __._, i .n . PROPERLY LINE MAP 4 N t Sc f000F . I 4b it Ak Mir t r . • . tw;• >... . w.•• 1y 1.•••. • AfT Tr.hV .w 1. *r••P'•••ns•\•:.•• y , . / 1 ' ` I• •A' •' . UIIIIM' 1.• 11/ MM'r ....lF•..WO" ter i s w .... '" '• T •• v.y1' "1 'w a..aC'Y: : ?ii.'! `I"<' .Y: .r \' ' i • `', r w I,I ! t ,'. r4A ZZ 13 • r a •,.r.r +•t 1+1 .ylpp y w t4 ' , J . ri .,,.,,.+`...., . / • . ..aY 17 ' .. ',y .. ,. , • , .. ,. .,. .. sue l . AO c Fm t scACE" y " =1f . r April 8, 1983 Mi nnehaha Highland's Addition Block 6, Lot 6 762 Mary Street Maplewood, Mn. To Whom It May Concern: 1, Robert D. Schwan, home owner at the above location, am requesting permission and approval to ' construct an addition to my existing garage. This garage was built in a bank with two existing levels. I would be raising the present roof trusses eight feet. The upper addition would be 16' x 22'. The back of my lot joins the Union Cemetary's west boundry line. There are no alleys or other structures behind the garage. I've been a resident at this location for over 26 years and wish to conform to the building codes. I feel the request to build above the present garage is justifiable and will blend in with the landscape. Yours truly, Bob Schwan Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Chambers in said City on the day of 1983 at 7: 00 p. m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Robert D. Schwan applied for a variance for the following-desc ribed property: Lot 6, Block 6, Minnehaha Highlands This property is also known as 762 - Mar-.y Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 502 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires that private garages may not exceed one story ion height; WHEREAS, the -a.ppl i cant is proposing to cons truct a second-story garage9e addition requiring a variance of one story; - WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on Apri 11 19830 2. Thi Vaa 1 attire was rCY 1 CWCd uy 1.11C 'IcLp 1 Cvrrvt`u t tt,i n vveNi S vii vii 1983. The Planning Commission recommended the City Council that said variance be . 3. The llapl ewood City Council held a public hearing on to consider. this 'variance. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. - Al 1. persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Counci also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and .Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: The - two -story ara a would not - 'impact surrounding development because of its99 concealed location towards the rear of the property, and also due to the absence of residential development behind the si Adopted this day of 1983. Seconded by Ayes -- a STATE OF MINNESOTA } t COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD } I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the original on f i l e in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript there- from insofar as the same relates to . Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of 1983. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota i 8. NEW BUSINESS A. Variance: 762 Mary Street (Schwan) Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting approval of a varianceSeyStaffisrecommendinto - add a second story addition onto an existing garage. g approval of the request. Mr. Schwa said the propertyerty behind him is Union Cemetery. The garage addition will be level with the cemetery. The addition will be used for storage. Chairman Axdahl asked if anyone else wished to comment. Commissioner Fischer moved the Pl anni ag Commission recommend the City Counci 1 ado t the resolution approvi n9 a va for a tw -story gara 762 Mar _Stree _ Ass base on the fi nd n that the are conditions unique _to_he site_, i ._e ; the to_po ra ha t cemeter thetheL rear and two -tor a would not imp surrounding development,a - -- -- - -- -s_ -- - -- - -- ro er y an because of its _ concealed location towara tie re oo a p _p _ _ absence o resi dentea deve opmen behind t site. a so_ due to the _ _ Commi Barrett seconded Ayes- -Commi ssioners Axdahl , Barrett, El l efson Fischer, Hejny, Pel 1 i sh, Si gmundi k, S1 etten, Whitcomb MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Associate Planner--Johnson Action by Councii : SUBJECT: Plan Amendment (RH to LSC) LOCATION: 905 Parkway Drive _ Endorsed.._ APPLICANT: Director of Community Development - Modifi ec,,,____ OWNER: Patrick McCullough Re j ected____ DATE: April 28, 1983 Date SUMMARY Request Amend the Land Use Plan from RH, residential high density to LSC, limited service commercial for the Maple Hills office building. Reason for Change The Land Use plan and zoning map are inconsistent. As part of the city -wide downzoning program, one or the other should be amended to eliminate the problem. The present Land Use Plan designation for this property should be changed to recognize the existence of the existing office facility. The use is compatible with the location and adjacent planned land uses, Retaining the present designation of RH, high density res i dent.i al , would require a zoning change to residential as well. The result would be to make the off facility a non - conforming use. Such designation requires council approval for any future expansion or change of use. Designation as a non- conforming use 'i s unnecessary and should be avoided. In a separate report, the site is being recommended for downzoning from BC, business commercial to NC, neighborhood commercial, also part of the city's downzoning program. Recommendation I. Approve the enclosed resolution amending the Land Use Plan from RH to LSC for 905 Parkway Drive. II. Amend the acreage chart on page 19 -3 of the Land Use Plan to reflect the change from RH to LSC use. BACKGROUND Site Description Size: .5 acre with 208 feet of frontage on Parkway Drive Existing land use: office building Easements: a 20 x 40 foot parking easement abuts to the north and runs with the property to meet the parking requirements for the site. Additional land or easements must be acquired if building expansion were to be sought in the future. Surrounding Land Uses North: Drive access. to the Maple Hills Golf Course and proposed site of a senior's condominium development. Across the - driveway, single dwell - i ngs., planned for RH, high density residential use. East: Parkway Drive. Across the street, single dwellings and commercial uses, planned for SC, service commercial use. South: A single dwelling on a 1.6 acre parcel planned for RH, residential high density use. West: Bennington Woods condominium development under construction and a proposed development of condominiums for older adults. Past Actions 4- 10 -80: An administrative lot division was approved to separate the office building from the Maple Hills Golf Course. A 20 x 40 cross easement for four additional parking spaces was a requirement of the lot division. 4 -4 -83: The Planning Commission recommended that this site should be dealt with separately from the proposal to downzone the Maple Hills Golf Course from BC, business commercial to R -3, residence district (multiple dwelling). 4- 11 -83: Council downzoned the golf course property which surrounds the subject site from BC, business commercial to R -3, residence district (multiple dwelling). Planning 1. Land Use Plan designation: Present - -RH, residential high density Proposed- -LSC, limited service commercial A. The LSC classification refers to commercial facilities on a neighborhood scale. Heavy industrial uses, department stores, motels, auto accessory stores, etc. would be prohibited, while other land uses of a medium intensity nature would be permitted subject to meeting certain performance standards. B. The RH classification is designated for such housing types as apartments, two-family houses, nursing homes, dormatori es or elderly housing. 2 2. Zoning: Present - -BC, business commercial Proposed (separate report ) - -NC, neighborhood commercial Public Works Sewer and water are available. Planning Commission recommendation following a public hearing Metropolitan Council approval Council decision (at least three votes in favor are required for approval) jW Enclosures 1. Resolution 2. Location Map 3. Property Line Map 4. Parks i de - Land Use Plan B Attachment One Pursuant to due call and notice thereof,a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood,Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council Chambers in said City on the day of at 7:00 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: - WHEREAS, a proceedings for the amendment of the Maplewood Comprehensive M u n i c i p a l Plan entitled ".Plan for Maplewood" has been initiated . by the City of Maplewoodewood for a change of plannedanned use from RH, high density residentialP9 to LSC, limited service commercial for the following_ generally de5cri bed area: With easements; part of Lot 2 Moores Garden Lots, described as commencing at the southeast corner of said lot, thence northeasterly of the southeast line of ' said lot 364.08 feet to the beginning, thence continuing northeast on southeast l i n e 208.49 feet, thence northwest at a radius more or less 98.5 feet, thence south 32 degrees 52.5 minutes west 208.5 feet, thence southeast at a radius more or less 96.95 feet to the beginning in Section 17, Township 29, Range 22 WHEREAS, the procedural history of the proposed amendment is as follows: i. The City of Maplewood has a % omprehensive Municipal Plan entitled Plan for Maplewood" adopted pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 670, Laws 1965 (the Municipal Planning Act, Minnesota Statutes Annotated, Sections 462.351 to 462.364 thereof); 2. Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.355, Subdivision 2 and 3 thereof, provide for amendment of the Comprehensive Municipal Plan or of any Section thereof,, 3. An amendment of the Comprehensive Municipal Plan has been proposed by the City of Maplewood and referred to the Maplewood. Planning Commission, which held a .public hearing on the 2nd day of May, 1983 pursuant to Minnesota Statues, 462.355, Subdivision 2 thereof, notice by mail and publication having been given, heard all who wished to be heard, considered all written and staff reports and analysis. WHEREAS, the Maplewood testimony of those present, recommended approval of the NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT described plan amendment be fact: City Planning Commission, having considered, the all written submissions to it and staff reports, amendment. RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUKjL that the above- approved on the basis of the fol 1 awPPawing - findings of 1. The proposed change would not have any adverse effect on the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed designation would be consistent with adjacent land uses. Adopted this day of 1983. - Seconded by Ayes- - STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1983, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of 1983. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota r 6.0 22 Gervois Loke 60 L KOHLWA FW 9 GERVAIS E3E C ca E%c Keller VIKING ALARKV In W 25 COUNTY J Loke 9 o LELANDI JUN AV J 4k 4 BURKE U IRKE 4A 1 Av.ELDRIDGE] L sun) L Aj 0 wSELMONTBELMONT > vi — /' 4.5 4VE KILLMAN VF- as W LA. W6--: D z R 0 Z RNOMTVERNONAVE. z E R. z w 60 fieNJw C 28 FROSTs AVE. 26 T1 AVE po N % Soo If w a. LWOOD AVE. BELL x w F NTON AVE.27 62Z 3t 49 FRISSIE A 0 X dg J 0 IL mrY.-A AV F- 7 10 Lake PH 1A AS x Ro d scI.- a a 4n 39 x I.— z Er KING N AV E. z 0 C=ii Pholon 49 1 z p2 ICE VE. or 3 1.- w 1. Ab2 wox p E NTEU30A 9 FI[IF13FIn6l Attachment 2 LOCATION MAP v r. - S t 4 I low IMP Oo ` a loo r p•r / •6s-. c: p L 7 v. • - A •- ' 46 , T u a N a a to c 0 601 .1 M r C s Ck . L__ — — ..... — ..Q I l 01 ' ` - 4 f t. Loo ZOO 1 ;E000 IL A3 al y. -7 ZO 5 O - .,, 1 CIO d• J f - Nil Arl IG_ (,J r _ icj 1 1 • ib j i 2z .• i - : v ` i 20 joVA e t i r•,. _ '- 6 4111 sr , .pp _ *--• ! . Y L/ r• J ter' "•'' '- - • l• - , 7 - j PP- 4D so t - 6 . 1 N 7 BU SEA attachment three PROPERLY LINE MAP WITH ZONING r s a i sue' MORM owl I a to s- s 'a ` INati v KIM St X11 : t ! . d ww -Iii = _ ' l — • AM •.a .._ 4r'.Cr2 iy.A F -ow =jw • , • • -• itiirfsii'1 r "_..r.7r.t. -'•. ter. ' Y y Attachment 4 -- P NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN y 4 N A. Plan Amendment: 905 Parkway Drive Secretary Olson read the notice of public hearing. The proposal is to amend the land use plan from RH to LSC. Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment on the proposal. No one was present an d Chairman Axdahl closed the public hearing portion of the meeting. Commissioner P rew m_ b P 1 a-M n9 —C s i n omme d..;.p...o a 1 o f he resolution amendi n the Land Use Plan f rQ-m RH tQ-LS_C .f or_9.D5._Parkway e_ and, a]so -- amend_ tb. e- _acr_ea9e- chart_orL..pa -ge._193tf-3 ect -Aha bange f r H to - LSf.. sinner Fischer seconded Ayes- -Commi ssi oners Axdahl,niCom s i mund k WhitcombBarrett, El lefson, Fischer, Hejny, Pe .l i sh, Prew S g , 5 -2 -83 i MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Associate Planner--Johnson SUBJECT: Rezoning - -BC to BC(M) LOCATION: 905 Parkway Drive OWNER: Patrick McCullough APPLICANT: Director of Community Development DATE: April 28, 1983 SUMMARY kf Action by Council Endorse.. Mo did' Re j eoted .,. Date Request Rezone the Maple Hills Office Building from BC, business commercial to BC(M), business commercial (modified). Reason for Change 1. The City Council initiated this rezoning as part of its "downzoni ng" program. This is where the zoning allows a more intensive use of t-he property than the Land Use Plan. r 2. In a separate report, this property is being recommended for a Land Use Plan. amendment from RH, high density residential, to LSC, limited service commercial . Comments The present BC business commercial zoning allows more intensive uses than anticipated by the proposed land use plan designation of LSC, limited service commercial. The existing office building-use is compatible with the multiple dwelling residential development which is under construction and proposed to the west. The concern is that the present use may in the future convert to an incompat- ible use. The BC(M) district would permit the widest range of uses compatible with the abutting residential development. BC(M) zoning would also permit the existing facility to remain a conforming use. Recommendation Approval of the enclosed resolution, amending the zoning for the Maple Hills Office Building from BC, business commercial to BC(M), business commercial modified). BACKGROUND Site Description Size: .5 acre with 208 feet of frontage on Parkway Drive Existing Land Use: A one -story office building with about 4368 square feet of foundation area. The basement is used as a law library and storase area contain- ing about 1849 square feet under the northerly portion of the building. Easements: A 20 x 40 foot parking easement abuts to the north and runs with the property to meet the parking requirements for the site. Additional land or ease- ments must be acquired of building expansion were to be sought in the future. Surrounding Land Uses , North: Driveway access to the Maple Hills Golf Course and proposed site of a seniors' condominium development. Across the driveway, single dwellings, planned for RH, high density residential use. East: Parkway Drive. Across the street, single dwellings and commercial uses, planned for SC, service commercial use. i South: A single dwelling on a 1.6 acre parcel planned for RH, residential high density. West: Bennington Woods condominium development under construction and a proposed development of condominiums for older adults. Past Actions 4- 10 -80: An administrative lot division was approved to separate the office building from the Maple Hills Golf Course. A 20 x 40 ft. cross easement for four additional parking spaces was a requirement of the lot division. 4 -4 -83: The Planning Commission recommended that this site should be dealt with separately from the proposal to downzone the Maple Hills Golf Course from BC, business commercial to R -3, residence district (multiple dwelling). 4- 11 -83: Council downzoned the golf course property which surrounds the subject site from BC, business commercial to R -3, residence district (multiple dwelling). Planning 1. Land Use Plan designation: Present: RH, high density residential Proposed: LS.C, limited service commercial separate report) 2; Zoning: Present:BC, business commercial (attachment four). Proposed: BC(M) business commercial - (attachment five). 3. Policies from the plan: a. Zoning maps should be updated as necessary to make both land use maps and zoning maps compatible. b. The LSC, limited service commercial designation refers to commercial facilities on a neighborhood scale. Heavy industrial uses, department stores, motels, auto accessory stores, etc. would be prohibited, while other land uses of a medium intensity nature would be permitted subject to meeting certain performance standards. 4. Compliance with land use laws: Section 36 -485 of city code states that "In any instance where the city council or the planning commission is required to consider an exception or change in this chapter, including the zoning map, in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, the council or pl anni ng * commi ssion shall, among other things: a. Assure itself that the. proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of this chapter. b. Determine that the proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area i ncl uded in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. c. Determine that the proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare." Public Works Sewer and water are available. AUiiiriSTnnT ivL 1. Planning Commission recommendation 2. City Council holds a public hearing and makes a decision. At least four votes are required for approval. mb Enclosures: 1. -.Resolution 2. Location Map 30 Property Line Map _ 4. = BC District 5. BC(M) District 3 - Attachment One - Puruant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council Chambers in sA i d City on the day of 1983 at 7: 00 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business commercial to BC (M) business commercial (modified) for the following described property: With easements; part of Lot .2 Moores Garden Lots, described as commencing at the southeast corner of said lot, thence northeasterly of the southeast line of said lot 364.08 feet to the beginning, thence continuing northeast on south- east line 208.49 feet, thence northwest at a radius more or less 98.5 feet, thence south 32 degrees 52.5 minutes west 208.5 feet thence southeast at a radius more or less 96.95 feet to the beginning in Section 17, Township 29, Range 22 This property is :also known as 905 Parkway Drive, Maplewood* WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. The rezoning was initiated by City of Maplewood, pursuant to chapter 36, article VII of the Maplewood Code. of Ordinances, 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Mapl e:ood Planning Corm issio n on May 16, 1983. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on to consider this rezoning Notice thereof was published and m a i l e d pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the-following findings of fact: 1. The zone change would be consistent with the intent of the Land Use Plan. 2. The change would not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property. 3. The change would be in the public. interest, eliminating the potential of overly intensive commercial uses which would be incompatible with adjacent residential uses. -_. Adopted this day of Seconded by Ayes-- i STATE OF MINNEOSOTA } COUNTY OF RAMSEY } SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD } I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1983, with the original on file i n my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of 1983 City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 22 0 -- o Ko h lm o n o LoAt Lake KOWLWA c -- -.-.-23 4n Arww ar c o W d _ W J op Keller ~ aRK AVE. i LR K 7vE VIKING L p L o Ar a o Yf W IOLEl1N R Q 25 _ o SUN TlON FAVE L) t- BURKE V. U RKE ELDRIO LOPIDGE ay. , I z U k v A11 > MLwONT LA. 15EL W0P _ c pQ 4 t a 50 .SKILLW&N s .K t W o V E , r ! - w OD LA. ~ W D H R ac V J W t c QYDN SONEVERNONE W bO a* < ; o Z „ ZS FROST v ' avE 50 nr oo AVE. BELL x t: 2] i f NEON AVE. L O J n s 2 3 AV E.t FRISK E 49 0 = < t- O J o N 3 41 PL 91 rV E. Y AV Q W Lake $o P IA AtiE 10 R d sc z avE. ' z D s KLwc Ae Pholen < -j z Pi vE o 30W a P NT 30 61 C o -- _. t i Attachment z LOCA. MAP -Bch ooOtt S 4r I r S 2 %0 9 0 Ilk LIN fell 7 . t p 14 001 .5 b . C, a Or 20o m NORY 9 77 w ` ,Lot 4 j 6 100 7 5J Z6 t >, 168 -,”? rot ;;; - . •.3r `' '•' dw 1 2 s t ! Q3 ` • s _ 8 G 1% -1 r --- f IG cJ 't9 18 L 7 , 6 f t t :.._. st .,. ; F. s • 14. .. • 1 20 Z4 y `tic. `• A _ - ' _ —'• _ * L ; `s : ` i 7 71 pol jq t Vi=a D7O cr I 6 o d 1 E u PROPERTY LINE MAP ut tachmient three WITH ZONING i r r S i • r Sec. 36-1 Use regulations. In a BC Business and Commercial District in the city, the follow- ing regulations shall apply 1) Permitted uses. A building may be erected or used, and a lot ' may be used or occupied, for any of the follo'ing purposes, and no other: a) Apartment for one family in combination with business use. b) Hotel, motel, tourist home, rocming hous& -or boajding- bouse. c) Retail store, restaurant, office., agency, studio, bank, personal service and Cropa] _ ftsrn e n's sh op, m ortu ary_ ' d) Automobile sales agency, used car lot, parking garage or lot, provided all facilities are located and all services are conducted on the lot_ e) ?`evespaper publishing, job printing establishment i f) 71 eater. a Hand or but- ornatic self - service laundry. h) Bakery or confectionery shop, for the production of ar- - ti cl es 1o be sold only alt retail on the pr emises. i) Public garage or motor fuel st -a ion; provided that a license to operate sucb business is first obtained from the city council pursuant to chapter 17 of this Code. All public garages and motor fuel stations must be so lo- cated on the site and the site shall be of the size as provided in section 36 - of this division which defines kinds of operation, site area required and other data relating to such business. V7 Any use of the same general character as any of the above permitted uses; provided that, .no use wbicb is noxious or hazardous shall be permitted. s 2) Special exceptions: The following uses are allowed when authorized by the city council as a special exception: a) All users permitted in R -3 Residence Districts, except the construction of dwelling }souses permitted in divi- sions 3 and 4 of this article, R -1 and R -2 Residence - Districts_ _ b) Processing and distributing slation for milk or other beverages, carting or hauling station_ • c) Place of amusement, recreation or assembly, other than a theater, when conducting indoors. d) Yard for storage, sale and distribution of ice, coal, fuel oil or building materials, when enclosed within a fence of not less than six (6) feet in }eight, but not including junkyard, salvage, automobile or other wrecking yard. r i q i I Attachment five Sec. 36 -155_ BC(M) Commercial District (Modified). 1. INTENT. The BC (ri), Business Cor- nerci al- Modif i ed District is intended to provide for the orderly transition be the en more Intensive cor."nerc i al uses and low or medium density residential areas. Restrictions on, but not limited to, building height, setbacks, orientation, parking lot location or ),Pcation of building entrances may be required to ensure compatibility L•itii abutting residential uses. 2. USE REGULATIONS. A building may be-erected or used, and a Iot may be used or occupied, for any of the fol lww' ing purposes, and no other: a_ Retail store; professional administrative offices; bank of savings and loan; personal service, craftsmen's shop, mortuary b. Hotel or motel f C . Valk-in theatre - d. Job printing sbop - C. Bakery or candy shop producing goods for on- premises retail sales. f_ Any use of the sa=ne general character as an •of the above permittedyP uses, as determined by the City Council, provided that no use vbich is noxious or hazardous shall be permitted 3_ The following uses when avtborized by the City Council by means of a special use permit: A. All uses permitted in R -3 ?Multiple D- Belling Districts, except the con- struction of houses permitted in R -1 and R--2 districts. b. Laundromat or similar automatic self- service laundry low c. Restaurant, where there are no drive -up order windows or serving of food to patrons In their automobiles_ All cooking odors must be controllo so as not to be noticeable to adjacent residences. • - d.. _ 'Place of amusement, recreation, or assembly, other than a theater, wbere there are no outdoor activitles. JT5. J('Daftick 9 ATTORNEYS AT LAW D. PATRICK MGCULLOUGH MAPLE HILLS OFFICE CENTER LEGAL ASSISTANTS JONATHAN A. DYRUD 905 PARKWAY DRIVE MARGARET A. CORBO JEFFREY M. SMITH ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55106 -1096 RUTH M. LANDWEHR 612) 772 -3446 L. L. SCHROEDER JEROME A. RITTER OF COUNSEL INVESTIGATOR June 6, 1983 Mr. Geoff Olson, AICP Director of Community Development City of Maplewood 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: Down -Zonin g of Maple Hills Office Building Dear Mr. Olson: As I indicated to Y ou per phone on June 6, 1983, I wish to reiterate my position in writing as owner of the above - captioned real estate. I authorized and kindly directed you to advise the Commissioners that I would not be in attendance at the June 6th meeting and that my position is as follows: As owner of 905 Parkway Drive, my preference is to main - tain the zoning as Business Commercial, however if the Commission does not agree, then of course, the least objectionable down- zoning would be as per your latest request-of Business Commercial Modified. I thank y ou for your courtes ' s and cooperation i his matter. e`r /trulyf y yours, c ongh DPM : s a i 7 c Parkway DaverkA. Rezoning: 905 Pa y o rezone the site to BC (M). The ar Olson said the proposal is t Secretary owner of the property could not at tend the meeting, prefers the BC zone. The Commission questioned if staff had reviewed the possi - bi 1 i ty of using the NC district at this site. Secretarytar Olson said staff felt the BC (M) district best for this property. Commissioner Whitcomb moved the Planning Commission recommend to the nci 1 a roval of the resolution amending the zoni ? M) for the Ma 1 e City cou AA Hills Office Buildin from BC, business commercial to BC business commercial (modified ). Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl , Barrett, Ell of son, He jny, Pel l i s h, Si gmund i k, S1 etten , Whitcomb Nays -- Commissioner Fischer. C-7 -/ MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: Award of Bids for DATE: June 21, 1983 Insurance Action by Councjil: Endorsed... Modified — Re j e ct e d.L.._,. ........o. Date PROPOSAL It is proposed that (a) the City's existing self- insured worker's compensation coverage through the League of Minnesota Cities be renewed effective July 1,9 9 1983 for one year but without an insurance agent and (b) the bid for property and liability insurance coverages be awarded to the Hartford Insurance Company through the agency of Lakeview Associates, Incorporated. BACKGROUND Prior to this year, it has been past practice to have the Agents. Insurance Committee solicit quotations each year for City insurance (except employee coverages). In 1981, quotations were received from Home Insurance Company and the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) In 1982, only one quotation was received and it was from the LMCIT. The Home Insurance Company 0didnotsubmitaquotationbecausetheybelieveditwould not have been com-u p eti ti ve with the LICIT, Present City insurance coverages are provided by the LMC I . Since the Agents Insurance Committee has been abolished, the procedure for obtaining quotations was changed significantly. Our current insurance agent, Jerry kblad prepared a rough draft of the bid specifications which I revised and expanded. y p These specifications were typed and duplicated y yD 'cated b City staff. Ads were published in the Maplewood Review and St. Paul Dispatch requesting quotations* In response to these ads, 11 insurance agenciesrequestedinsurancqP 1 of 22 copieses of the specifications . As a result, the City received bids a tots p ., from four insurance companies through three insurance agency es BID ANALYSIS is attached as Exhibit A, The low bid of $46,904Atabulonofthebidsreceived property and liabili coverages was submitted by Lakeview Associates, Inc. for , ro, .y y - • $3,164 lesswiththeHartfordInsuranceCompany. This bid wasforcoverages than the next lowest bid submitted by three 60ents for coverage s with the Oaomaah Lakeview Agency appears to be quail; i f i ed enoughHomeInsu.rance y T he - g y to handle the City's insurance based upon the questionnairere that they completed s ecifi A copy of the questionnaire is attached rhch was required by the p as Exhibit B. The low bid will provide coverages equal to and in some cases, d b the speciHi cations, ons , Therefore, it is recommended that better than require y d to the Hartford the bid for property and 1*insurance coverages be awarded e p y Insurance Company through the Lakeview Agency. proposals for three additional types of The Lakeview Associates also submitted pro, insurance coverages re i that were not required to be bid. The coverages were for pub1 c o f f i ci al .1 aw enforcement and umbrel 1 a q ,• 1 i abi 1 i ty coverages Law enforce-L : ment and umbrella coverages are unnecessary opt ni o . Regardi ngcoverages, in my the oubl i c official liabil insurance, the City currently has this type of Page 2 coverage with the Great Southwest Fire Insurance Company through the Ekblad Agency. This coverage was not bid as our current policy was recently renewed. However, the premium for the same coverage with Hartford is $804-- less. There- f it is recommended that the Ci t.y's public official l i a b i l i ty coverage be transferred to the Hartford Insurance Company and the Lakeview Agency effective July 1, 1983. Two ptypest ,Y . of workers' compensation bids were received. One type was based upon a prospective rating plan (or standard plan) and another was based upon a retro- spective rating plan .(or retro plan). Under the standard plan, the annual premium is based on an experience modification factor and is - subject to adjustment only for payroll costs. Under the retro plan, the annual premium is also based on an experience modification factor and is subject to adjustment for payroll costs. However, the retro plan premium is also based upon actual losses. The retro plan c an save mone y when losses are low but the City is exposed to penalty premiums when losses are high. The workers' compensation premiums listed i n Exhibit A are based on the assumption that losses w i l l be about $60,833, which is the average for the past two years, Based upon this assumption, the best option would be the prospective (or standard)Ba p plan under the League of Minnesota Cities self - insured program. Losses woul d • have to be less than $33,698 for the retrospective plan to generate a lower premium. Subj t o the approval of the L,M.C,I,T. Board, this workers' compensation coverage can be obtained without an agent, which will save the City 2% of the deposit premium 1, 643). In m opinion, anagent i not needed for workers' compensation coverages. Therefore, it is recommended that the Ci existi workers compensation cover - ages through the L.M.C.I.T. be renewed effective July 1, 1983 under a prospective g 9 rove coveragesp.notes approve _rating plan without an agent. if the L.M.C•I.T. Board does without ani agent, it is recommended that the coverages be provided through the g Lakeview Associates for ease of coordinati on. INSURANCE_ COMMITTEE f the Agents insurance Committee to discuss the I met with three former members o g ecabover ommendati ons . The three former members were Dick Pearson, B i l l Howard Irvin Anderson. These individuals agreed with the above recommendationsandga except that Bill Howard had reservations about the City not hav i g an g ent for workers' compensation. ion re ardin the possibility of formally reorganizingThere. was also some discuss 9 9. p t Agents Insurance Committee. However, it was the consensus of those presettheg that the committee not be formally reorgani zed . Instead, it was agreed to keep the group informal withih an annual meeting to be held to assist the City staff In the evaluation of insurance bids. 3RANSITION TO NEW AGENCY iates Inc. have agreed to compare the City "s The agents for the Lakeview Assoc g insurance policiespresenti with those that will be provided by Hartford to make era es are duplicated without any omissions, Also, this agency sure that al cov g p ,, ._ • indicatin ' errors has agreed to provide the City. w th a certificate of insurance 9 g • p willl service our account. A representandomcoverageontheagentsthatw fates will be at the Council Meeting to answer any questions ate ve of Lakeview Assoc that may arise. Page 3 SUMMARY It is recommended that (a) the City's existing self- insured workers' compensation Coverage through the League of Minnesota Cities be renewed effective July 1, 1983 for one year but without an insurance agent and (b) the bid for property and liability insurance coverages be awarded to the Hartford Insurance Company through the agency of Lakeview Associates, Incorporated. DFF :1 nb EXHIBIT A COVERAGE TYPE 1. Property 2. Floaters 3. Glass 4. Bond 5. General Liability 6, Auto 7. Paramedic Liability 8. Bus Sub -Total Less estimated dividends Net Premium 9. Worker's Compensation Retrospective Prospective Public Official L i a b i l i ty Law Enforcement Liability Umbrella Liability INSURANCE BIDS 6 -15 -83 LEAGUE BITUMINOUS HOME HARTFORD by Ekblad by Ekblad by _ 3 Agencies by Lakeview 7 9 16 7 3 2 4 5 55 60 8 32- 604 1 1 651 20 (B)18 9 13 ,145 (A) 21,799 (B) (C)20,503 (C)22,571 18,565 (C) 1 1 1,118 15100 (D) Incl. Above 1 2 Inc. Above 54,998 54 57,708 46 2 t833 0-7,0- 52,165 54 50 46,904 96 (E)90,448 96,971 (E) 67 75 78,238 67 (E) 2,250 F) 4,160 3,950 The three agencies were: Beulke Agency, White Bear Lake Ekblad, Pardee & Bewel l , Inc., Maplewood Lakeview Associates, Inc., Pine Springs A No deductible on sewer claims - specs called for $500 deductible, B)$500,000 combined single limit specs called for $300,000 combined single limit. C)Includes underinsured motorist coverage - not called for in specs. D )$300,000 combined 'n single limit - specs called for $100,000 per claim and $300,000g . annudl aggregate, E)Represents.League of Minnesota Cities quote, F }Claims made bas yisretro3 rs. $1,000,000 combined single limit, $2,000 deductible Present coverage costs $3,064, same limits but $2,500 deductible. G Covera a with St. Paul Fire & Marine.9 EXHIBIT B s1A KE VIE1 associnres, INC, 3504 LONG LAKE ROAD a PINE SPRINGS, MINNESOTA 55109 • (612) 770 -9382 U QUESTIONNAIRE FOR AGENCY Name of Agency: Lakeview Associates, Inc. Address: 3504 Long Lake Rd. , North St. Paul, NN. 55109 Number of full -time personnel in this office: 4 Number of municipal plans administered: None Number of years in business 'o 3 Name of individual(s) who will service our policies: Robert Connor & Peggy Hill Qualifications (education, certifications, years of experience, etc.): Bob Connor - 5 years licensed agent -full time, B.S. degree economics and accounting. 4 years experience as a Municipal Auditor and Governmental Accountant Peg Hill - 15 years Insurance experience including .5 years as Commercial Lines Underwriting Licensed agent 3 years. Indicate services that will be provided to the City: All of the Standard Services provided by an insurance agency,plus the following services are available on a request basis. A) Fire inspection of all buildings for possible improvementstohelpreducerates. B) Inspection of all buildings for possible safety hazards.C) Work with City Attorney and Police Department to reduce exposure to Professional Liability,D Provide posters to help encourage awareness of safety.E Inspect Park Sites for potential hazards. F To attend meetings and afford Consultation with regard to Insurance Coverages. This - is being submitted by Lakeview Associates Inc. Robert J. Connor - Agent Low Cost Insurance •Retirement Accounts •High Yield Investments action by Council: Endors e d___...._, TO: Barry Evans, City Manager Modified, FROM: Larry Cude, Director of Emergency Preparedness ReJected , SUBJECT: Bid Opening for Radio Receivers Date_._.._..,.._,......, DATE: June 20 1983 Bids were opened on the 13th of June in the presence of myself, Police Chief Collins, Jim Amos from General Electric and Jinn Sobey from Motorola. Due to the technical complexity of the bids submitted, I solicited the help of Phil Sanders from the City of St. Paul -Radio Maintenance Division, to help determine who in actuality was low bidder. Motorola's base price is $14,266.30, and option of $829.00 for two SPSA high selectivity receivers, bringing Motorola's price to 15 General Electric's base price is $15,505.00. They indicate on their bid that $900.00 for wall mount requirements is an option, bringing the bid to $14,605.00. The wall mount as written in our specifications is not an option but a requirement which would put the base price at 15,505.009 It is in my best judgement and the recommendation of St. Paul Radio that Motorola be awarded the bid for $15,095.30. I am enclosing a copy,of the letter we received from Phil Sanders detailing his recommendation. DEPARTMENT OF POLICE CITY OF SAINT PAUL INTER- OFFICE COMMUNICATION s TO: Larry Cude, Maplewood Civil Defense From; Phil Sanders, Radio Maintenance Unit Subject: Radio Equipment Purchase, Bid 06 -13 -83 Date: 06 -16 -83 we have reviewed the proposals submitted by Motorola and G. E. and recommend the equipment be purchased from Motorola as follows: Equipment Base Bid $ 14, 266.30 The G. E. sub -total of $15#505.00 is the equipment base bid price since Item 1 -C is a specification requirement and the cost must be included in the equipment base bid price. Both Motorola and G.E.'s base bid receivers meet the specifications. However, we feel the added protection against interference offered by Motorola's option 1 -D should be included in the City Hall receiver City Hall Item #Z) and the Maplewood Water Tower receiver (Maplewood Item #2) . The $1,000000 cost for this option is a field installation cost. Per telephone conversation with Jim Sobey on June 15, 1983, he indicated Motorola would include option 1 -D in the two receivers at the factory for a total cost of $829.00 (City Hall receiver $444.00, water Tower recei $385.00) . The total project cost would then be as follows: Base Bid $ 14,266.30 option I -D, City Nall Receiver 444900 Option 1 -D, Water Tower Receiver 385.00 15, 095.30 If you have any questions regarding this recommendation, please contact rte at 292 -35990 PS /vs PM 73.65 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: OWNER /APPLICANT: PROJECT: DATE: City Manager Associate Planner -- Johnson Final Plat and Time Extension Sterling Street and Mai 1 and Road Marvin Anderson Construction Company Crestview Forest Second Addition June 20, 1983 Action by Council: Endorsee_.._ . Mod -.1 Re j ected. Date SUMMARY Request Final plat approval to construct sixteen townhouse units as the second phase of the Crestview Forest planned unit development Proposal 1. Each unit is designed for individual ownership. 2. An asphalt trail would be constructed from proposed Sterling Street to the undeveloped city park to the west. 3. Sterling Street would be extended to the south property l.i ne (page 7) 4. The homeowners' association by-laws, approved for the first addition, would also apply to the remainder of the development. 5. The lot and street configurations are illustrated on pages 6 and 7. Comments The present final plat request is consistent with the requirements of the Crestview Forest planned unit development and city codes. A developer's agree- ment will be entered into to guarantee the construction of the required trail and Sterling Street. The applicant is making a good -faith effort to develop the Crestview Forest planned unit development in a timely manner. Phase I is completed and Phase II should be under construction shortly (page 6) . To eliminate any unnecessary time.. and effort 6n-the part of the applicant and ,city to process another extension in one year, due to the staged nature of the development, a two year extension to complete Phase II and begin Phase III (not yet delineated ) is suggested. . 1 Recommendation I . Grant a. two -year time extension for the Crestview Forest planned unit development. II. Grant a two -year preliminary plat time extension for the portion of the site lying east of Sterling Street. Second Addition final plat, subj 6t toIii. _Approve the Crestview Forest S P submission of a developer's agreement for construction of Sterling Street and the required trail, prior to the City si g'ni ng the final plat. s 2 BACKGROUND Past Actions 5- 15 -80: Council approved the preliminary plat for the Crestview Forest Townhomes subject to the following conditions: 1. The final plat shall not be approved until: a. • The city attorney has reviewed and approved by- and rules of the proposed homeowners' association to assure all common areas are maintained. b. A signed developer's agreement is submitted to the Director of Publ i c Works. 2. Redesignate the common areas as outlots. 3. Approval of final grading and drainage plan by the City Engineer, including dedication of necessary easements. 4. Approval of a planned unit development. ; 5. Provide for the dedication of a 20 -foot wide easement and construction of a 10 -foot wide bike /pedestrian trail from proposed Sterling Street to the west property line. Location to be determined by staff and applicant. Council also approved the planned unit development for the Crestview Forest w Bo (CDRB) Town homes sub ect to the f i nd i ng of the Commun i ty Design Rev i e that the bu i 1 d i n 9 s are of a scale, design and location that is compatible with s i . ngl a dwellings in any adjacent RL area. 9-4-80: Council approved a 90 -day time extension of the preliminary plat for the Crestview Forest Townhouses. 9- 23 -80: The CDRB approved the site and building plans. 10- 16 -80: Council approved final plat for phase one of the PUD, subject to meeting all of the conditions . of the preliminary plat prior to being signed and released by the city. Planning 10 Section 36 - 442 (e) states that "all conditional use permits s hal 1 be reviwed b Council within one year of the initial approval . At that time y specifyCouncilmasecif an indefinite term or specific term not to exceed five years, for subsequent reviews. 2. Section 1005(e) of the subdivision code provides that for one year foll - i n g preliminaryreliminar ap and for two years following final plat approvalPP oment to , aunlessthesubdividerividerandthecityagreeotherwise, no a s men Com rehensive Plan or official control shall apply to or affect the use, development dens i ty ., l si l layout or dedication or pl atti ng required or permitted by the approved application. Thereafter, pursuant to i yreulationstheci may extend the period by agreement with the subdivider 9 3 and subject to all applicable performance conditions and requirements, or it may require submission of a new application, unless substantial physical activity and investment has occurred in reasonable reliance on the approved application and the subdivider will suffer substantial financial damage as a consequence of a requirement to submit a new application. In connection with a subdivision involving planned and staged development, the city may by resolution and a grant the rights referred to herein for such periods of tim longer than two 2 years which it determirmes to be reason- able and appropr 0 ate z Procedure 1. Planning Commission recommendation for only the time extension request. 2. City Council approval. jw Enclosures 1. Location Map 2. Crestview Forest Planned Unit Development 3. Crestview Forest 2nd Addition Final Plat 4 w Attachment 2 F SIf C C., • doom 11 t 1 T _ so i t , Pha se I ' - _ • 1 wr,r' t• f 3 F A a I _ I • r - •M CK i LOT _ • i s L DCK an • OL dw UP I _ _ L ;• f • t t ld _ Phase II - tU*T 1 • T CIESTVtE1N SOREST SITE-PLAN Approved 9- 23 -80) 4 N lose r w..•r w •...•r wry • . F SIf C C., • doom 11 t 1 T _ so i t , Pha se I ' - _ • 1 wr,r' t• f 3 F A a I _ I • r - •M CK i LOT _ • i s L DCK an • OL dw UP I _ _ L ;• f • t t ld _ Phase II - tU*T 1 • T CIESTVtE1N SOREST SITE-PLAN Approved 9- 23 -80) 4 N Attachment 3 CRESTVIEW FOREST 2ND ADDITION 7 - 4 c _ 3193 / W4, Ik 4 P it. ObTL A 9w 0 in 0 2 4n re 00 Cr 904001 A W oot* 2 row too 30 o C7 CJTycc g ri 12 00 IM It 0'. sn Z 00 toodig 7 • 1 3 1200 of It 4 194.44 3001 3001 N 89*48*39*E 254.46 -- 3"fb fill• of fo•rfelvott lid f- fal S•Ilfh•1•f IH 0/ Swt/,sw 1; 4 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJE Increase in Plumbing Inspection Fees DATE' June 1, 1983 Request Action by Council Endorsed Modified Re j e ct e d.,- -- Date The .enclosed letter from Pat Daley, our plumbing inspector, requests an increase in inspection fees from $10.00 for each inspection to 80% of the permit fee. Financial Impact The director of finance has made the following analysis of this request: In 1982, the plumbing inspector received $3,610.00. If he had been paid 80% of the plumbing permit fees, as he is currently requesting for 1983, he would have received $6,687-00, which is 85% more. However, this is not a true comparison because the inspector is paid after the inspection has been made, which could be months . after the plumbing permit is issued. Another way to compare the requested increase with the present fees is vn an indiVIdua - 1 periiii t basis. Tic a'v'er aye plumbiiy ici it fca is approximately $35.00. The inspector's requested fee of 80/ of the permit fee amounts to $28.00. Currently, he is paid $10.00 per inspection and there are two inspections for each permit. Thus, the requested increase amounts to an average of $8.00 per permit, which is a 40% increase. Comparison to Other Inspectors Mr. Daley makes less than the other consultant inspectors for Maplewood, as well as other cities in the metro area. The other Maplewood inspectors are paid as follows: El 80.6 of permit fee Plumbing for Maplewood Plumbing jobs (Woodbury Inspector) : 80% of permit fee Heating: 75.6 of permit fee Mr. Dal ey' s request is in l i n e with other cities. Of the twenty c.i ti es closest to Maplewood in population, only three had a consulting plumbing inspector. The others had a staff inspector. Of these three, two received 80% of the permit fee and one received 70% of the permit fee. Of the nine cities adjacent to Mapl ewood, two use consulting plumbing inspectors. Woodbury pays 80% of the permit fee and Newport pays 70% of the permit fee. - Recommendation 0 Raise the plumbing inspector's fee to 80% of the permit fee. ic enclosure Letter from Pat Daley 2 City Manager City of Maplewood 13$0 Frost Ave. Maplewod, Minn 55109 Dear Sir: I would like to request a change in the inspection fees for Plumbing inspections: With the increased cost of travel, phone and radio [page boy] I would like to go on the same basis with the rest of the inspector, 80o of permits. Respect yii t Ale, Pat Daley Plumbing Inspector: TO' FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNERS: DATE: Request 1 kMEMORANDUM - -i Action by Council: Endorse City Manager Modifie Director of Community Development Rejected.._._.Plan Amendment Date North side of . Gervai s Avenue, east of Four ea =sons ark City of Maplewood - John and Karen Oswald (1694 Demont Avenue) , Victory in Christ Church, Jane and Otto Fol ger (1715 Gervai s Ave John and Joan Amon (1725 Gerva i s Avenue) , Glen and Janet Wilke (1733 Gervai s Avenue) and Lecon Properties, Inc. June 20,1983 SUMMARY The city is considering amending their land use plan for the area on the enclosed mapspfromRH, res_i denti al high density to LSC, limited service commercial, Reason for the Request This area is being studied because of the conflict between the land use planandzoningordinance. The land use plan shows this area being developeded into hi dens' g p high density residential development (attachment three). The zoning is LBC,limited bus i ness commercial and R -1, residential district (single dwelling),attachment two). Comments The land use plan for this site should remain as RH, except for the church, because: 1. Land planned for multiple dwellingss has decreased andp9 will probablycontinuetodecrease, thereby making it more difficult to achieve the housing goals in the comprehensive plan. 2. The site is well suited for multiple dwellings. 3. Multiple dwellings would not have a significant effect on the neighborhood to the north. A rezoning should be reconsidered when a specific developmentplanispresentedthatwillassuretheneighborsthattheirneighborhoodwill be protected. 4. RH is preferred by the property Owner. Land planned for multiple dwellings decreased by 24 acres in the last year. It appears that with council initiated plan amendments , there w i l l be further declines i the next year. , (Refer to page No. 4 Planning Considerations. ) Six percent of all the acreage in the city planned for residential development is designated fo*r . high density. The city should try to maintain this land that is undeveloped and does not conflict with surrounding uses, to achieve the hou g goals in the comprehensive plan. s. This site would be excellent for multiple dwellings, because traffic would flow into Gervai s Avenue and not through a residential neighborhood. The site is also convenient to a park and church. The neighborhood opposition to the previous R -3 rezoning is understandable,but unwarranted. There were no development plans that would have assuredtheneighborstothenorththattheirneighborhoodwouldbgdeprotected. BecauseofthesteepslopessouthofDemontAvenue, it is not P ractical to extend Fl andrau Street and Bittersweet Lane south. • It would also not be ood planningn9Pgtoallowtraffictogonorththroughthatneighborhood. of the steepslopesandtrees, development of this site would not even be visible to the neighborhood. There is also an east -west trail proposed at the`base of this slope that would further separate the neighborhood to the north from a future development to the south. Recommendation Approval of the enclosed resolution redes i gnati ng two acres of the church site from RH, residential high density to C, church and amending the acreage chart as shown on page 8. •p g No change is recommended for the RH designation. 2 - 4 BACKGROUND Site Descr.i ption Acreages : RH, residential high density land--38.7 P, park land--5 Existing land uses: A church, four single dwellings (one is abandoned ) and undeveloped land Easements: The city has a 320 -foot wide easement -at the east end of the site for storm water ponding and drainage. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single - dwelling homes and Ramsey County open space Easterly: Undeveloped land owned by Lecon Properties, Inc. The city council approved a final plat on May 6, 1982 for a shopping mall on this property. The plat was never recorded. Southerly: Gerva Avenue and commercial development Westerly: Four Seasons Park r Past Actions 4 -7 -66: The Lecon Properties site was rezoned from F, farm residence to SC shopping center. ' 11- 20 -69: The Lecon site was rezoned from SC to LBC, limited business commercial. At the time, apartments could be allowed in an LBC zone. The Planning Commission has recommended approval for a variety of plans by the former property owner for this site--all showing multiple dwellings. 9 - 13 - 82:. Counci gave concept approval to Woodmark, Inc. to construct apart- ments for elderly housing on part of the Lecon site. This project was later moved to a site on Parkway Drive. 4- 25 -83: Council did not approve a rezoning o R -3, because the neighborhoodgg preferred (LBC), 1 imi ted business commercial.- Council then initiated a P 1 an amendment to LSC, limited service commercial. 5- 16 -83: The planning commission set a hearing date and expanded the study area west to Four Seasons Park. Planning 1: Land Use Plan designation: RH, high density residential r s The RH classification i s. designated for such housing types - apartments9yP : ' p two-fami housing, townhouses, nursing homes, dormatori es ; "or elderly housing. The maximum population density is 34 people for each net acre. The number of units for each acre would vary by dwelling type and bedroom mix. As an example, a two-and three - bedroom townhouse proj with private roads would be allowed a maximum dens-i ty of nine units for each acre. A similar apartment project would be allowed twelve units for each acre. 3 - 3. The LSC, limited service commercial classification refers to commercial facilities on a neighborhood scale. Heavy industrial uses, department stores, motels, auto accessory stores, etc. would be prohibited, while other land uses of a medium intensity nature would be permitted subject to meeting certain performance .standards 4. The land planned for multiple - dwelling housing in the city IT declined and wi 11 decl i ne i n the future. As of Apri 1, 1982, 955 acres or 20% of the planned residential land in the city was designated for multiple dwelling development. As of May, 1983, this acreage had dropped to 931 acres, because of plan amendments. The council , at a joint meeting with the planning commission on May 16, directed that multiple-dwelling land be further reduced in areas close to single - dwelling neighborhoods. There are al so areas planned for multiple - dwelling development that are already developed with single dwelling homes, such as the north side of County Road C, west of Highway 61. This distorts the acreages planned for multiple dwellings. 5. Zoning: LBC, limited business commercial and R -1, residence district single dwelling). The LBC zone is limited to professional offices and similar uses approved by the council. Legal i There is a pending law suit brought by the owners of 1725 and 1733 Gervai s Avenue against the city over the assessments for Gervais Avenue. A plan amendment to LSC would not cause a problem. Public Works The steep slopes south of Demont Avenue would make it impractical to extend Fl andrau Street or Bittersweet Lane to the south. It also seems unlikely that Demont Avenue would be extended to connect the two. There would not be enough bui 1 dabl a lots created to justify the cost. Parks Both the parks plan and land use plan propose an expansion of Four Seasons Park to the east. The Director of Community Services is still interested in park expansion and recommends that there be no change in the parks plan. A trail is also proposed from Four Seasons Park to the Ramsey Open Space land--dividing the RL and RH areas. Other Agencies Ramsey County has no al ans for acquisition on this site. PrnrPHijrP 1. Planning commission holds a public hearing and makes a recommendation to V. the city council.r 2. City council makes the final d- mb Enclosures: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Plan Map 4 - 4. Acreage Chart 5. Resolution TSOMRUW 1 iA 1 so .LYID n1N RttNr X00 `, f I . AVE. SEAN f AYE.t R A A T J • 1 r :. y _ - _ • '• _ -r ` T.- r K044LYAN AVE. `KOHL AVE. , T fr a W 1•- ' aaEwu RD. EMONT AV lu S T r AVE. ::,.,.:•. :::::::::: =:• _ A It !R AVE. Q SE XT. 4r r GERVAIl f- COURTaKaviEx _ or L!!j4,, IV I SHERREN BS Op LARK AYtr: L SWE - .to _ F•- FEAURMil RO. •, -. a rs RIE Ib. ELAN - 25 s I v . 65 i 64oiroJUMTINAVE. l. _.._.9 R AVE. - - oU KE AVE -v . , K E .. ELDRIDR AVE. tip t- a K'usuc p ELItQ aVE. 64 ` - " 00- " Ir Z t NvKYL.LMA AVE.= "'- ' r /Q '4 1 _ - y ROS 000 AVE. _ RY A no _emir EA r _ f Attachment One LOCATION MAP - f R11% o C job Rl it J a oil Ls A ~ 0 -ILA WETLAND ; •- • t i 6 34 -'BC i STEEP SL PAS rrf--- r• c~ 1, • A.9 • for w 1 is or KI Ci P t C -3 V ItJO Y I N . i ' r HRIST CHURA 1 1 bG 1 0 1 Rr iJ 1 60 si Montgomery Ward Co Ol '• L ?ac = _OZ 119,33RI7 fir 1 _!._ •' - ti p Oka. A to 0 L BC n 9 r M I Z . 4s. ir 471 4 - n- --- 1 . i P _/ ZONING M AP_ FI attachment two s v v S` t Q RH SC interchange - riot l arteria! -- - interchan er - g a nats Yeights rnajor cotiettot RB . t o ' TCBWo , d Ocor. . d ' r [ 52 In Ka E2 C: minor arterial Vs - f a . ft C I JRm 1 3 a 1 S . S r . major cc ector CJ3R C' rr r 4L major colielor RM J& maj0 Coh ctor --- BW 1 ii:is•in t erch nge ajor rteria -i change _. V AD - a ' MEMO r i Attachment Three Study Area Hazelwood '= NEIGFIBuRHOOD LAND USE FLM Existing Plan J. RH-- Residential Hi Density P= -Parrk OS - -Open Space SC-- Service Commer i 1 7._ Attachment Four: Planned Acreages y with proposed changes Note: Previous figure of 7 acres was in error. _ This should have been 78 acres. Corrections have been included in the totals. Alt- r r Z CURRENT AS OF 5 -17 -83 Acres Planned and Designated P1 annin9161 Neighborhood Open Are No .Name RL RM RH Space Corn.Str.I nd .Total 1 Western Hills 132 0 64 175 98 106 0 575 2 Parksi de 435 47 35 235 20 218 0 990 3 Kohl man Lake 280 8 0 222 75 145 0 730 4 Hazelwood 398 62 76 - - Z'74 330 378 251 i791 5 Maplewood Heights 169 125 0 99 34 120 0 547 6 Sherwood Glen 303 55 14 259 118 211 0 960• 7 Gladstone 318 26 1 192 56 167 0 760 8 Hillside 285 111 11 455 34 229 24 115149 9 Beaver Lake 272 145 61 224 472 316 40 1 10 Battle Creek 144 0 5 532 30 125 0 836 11 Vista Hills 244 62 21 113 0 110 0 550 12 Hi ghwood 573 0 0 173 9 189 0 944 3 Carver Ridge 289 0 0 81 0 93 0 463 TOTAL 3,842 641 844 2 747 11 1 , ez SOURCE: Northwest Associated Consultants,Inc. Note: Previous figure of 7 acres was in error. _ This should have been 78 acres. Corrections have been included in the totals. Alt- r r Z Attachment Five: Plan Amendment Resolution RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the- MaplewoodcomprehensiveplanfromRH, resi dente al high density to C, church, ford 695 Gervai s venue 1 WHEREAS, the procedural history of this 1 an amendment i s as follows:oilows: 1. This plan amendment was initiated by the City of Maplewood. 2. The Maplewood planning commission held a public hearing on June 6 1983 to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and m a i l e d pursuant to law. All persons present at said heard n 9 were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The planning commi . s i on recommended to the city council that s a i d plan - amendment be . 3. The Metropolitan Council considered said plan amendment on , 1983, and determined that said plan arendment 4. The Maplewood city council considered said plan amendment on , 1983. The council considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission, city staff and Metropolitan Councilounci1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE TIT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described plan amendment be on the basis that the site is now used as a church. Adopted this day of Seconded by 1983. Ayes -- s s s f ` 9- Gervai s Avenue, west of White Bear Avenue. P13 A. Plan Amendment. Secretary Olson read the notice of public hearing. The proposal is to consider amending the land use plan for the area from RH to LSC. Chairman Ax dahl asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment on the P roposed amendment to the Land Use Plan. said he wishedshed the property to be lef Joe Zappa, 2522 Flandra u in C and the Commission balanceante the land use plan and the zoning designated LB high density 1 to bring-themthem in line with each other. Said when g y P n . g surrounding prope.prbects are developed, rties are greatly affeute.dCount The areas of Londin Lane and McKnight and Mesabi and White y also Atlantic and Duluth where there is high density Road B and Hazelwood, . affected the surrounding properties. He thought i f the propertyandhas wouldd be developed Rosel nand P iAdolphus, it would be much more comp ed to the LSC such as the development at than the high density residential developments i ctor in Christ Lutheran Church, questioned how the Harvey-Carlson, Victory - - change in the land use designation would affect their property. Would this l i m i t the use of the property* said he did not think the change wouldSecretary- affect the he church this is to have the land use designation on t - rurch, - 1 si family. property. The underlyi ng zoning would remain as R Harold Score 1 i , 2576 Southl awn Drive, said he agrees with what Mr. Zappa said. _ weet Lane, resented a iettc: to the Jack Jackson, 2547 Bitters P nation m his neighbors requesting the present land use designationcommissionfrom9 e of LSC remain. He wished the streets to remain as they are and not be extended. Minnesota,, said he did agree with re George Wens n, Rogers, M nnes zoning . wever, can understand how some of the residents the property to R-3, ho 1 e this item are skeptical about that. Possibly the Commi should tab until the could come in with a development plan. weet Lane, said he agrees with Gerald Hagstrom, 2534 Bi h Mr. Zappa et extended, much like Beam Avenue was east of White Bear, rt remain LBC. He did not wish • to let the prope to see his street which would erm t .heavyP traffic through a residential area. Chairman Axdahl read a letter from the resident at 2555 Bittersweet Lane that said he wished to have the property remain zoned as it is. (Raymond Schnaith)they Bill Burns, 2527 Bittersweet Lane, said he also wished to have the. property remain -LBC. S 1 Bill Anderson, 2561 Bittersweet Lane, agreed with the resit of the residents, the property should remain LBC. Said there are other areas in Maplewood that are more suitable for high residential development. He suggested the south side of highway 36 east of White Bear Avenue. John Oswald, 1694 Demont, questioned how the change would affect the development of his land. Secretary Olson said the Parks Commi ssi on-i s interested. i n ' expandi ng Four Seasons park onto Mr. Oswal d' s property. No definite proposal has been made. Vic Parsons, Victory in Christ Lutheran Church, questioned` if the Commission had considered zoning the property to R -1. Also asked how far south the park would be expanded, j Secretary . Oi son said there are no definite plans at this time. There was a general statement that they wished to expand the park to the east in some way. The assessments for the Gervais roadway was based on the high density or commercial rate. Lynn Larkin, 2557 Bittersweet Lane, questioned what benefit the Rh designation would have to the neighborhood and to Maplewood. Secretary Olson said when the 1973 Plan was established, thn. Commission and Council felt it was best to provide an alternative housing type to single - family homes. In that Plan percentages were established as to how much single, multiple, etc. there should be. Areas were designated RH where the City felt there would be no significant affect on a neighborhood. The benefit would be to provide housing for people who cannot afford or choose not to l i v e in a single-family home. Mrs. Larkin said being that the schools are closed and this property would develop to residential , there would be no place for the children go to school. Secretary Olson said the school board is notified of new developments. Mrs. Larkin said she did not think the school system can handle any more children than there is now. The Commission indicated the school board was made aware of the City's land use plan at the time they were - cons i der i_ng school closings. Harold Si corel 1 i , 2576 Southl awn, said he moved into the area because he liked the way it was, wished to have it remain that way. Mike Larkin, 2567 Bittersweet Lane, said if a small business is pl aced on the property, tax dollars would still be received, but would not requi re additional school space and it would not be necessary to construct additional streets and maintain them.. This seems l i k e a good reason for not changing the zoning. Sharon Si corel 1 i , 2576 Southl awn Drive, asked if the proposed change related to construction of a specific type of housing in this area. Chairman Axdahl said the original concept of the plan was to establ ish a bal ance between resi denti al , . commerci al , i ndustrial , etc. Commissioner Fischer further explained the reason why it is necessary to provide different types of housing. John Kavanagh, 758 E. 4th St. ,said the zoning should be uniform. He has been working with the owners of 1715 Ge rva i s and 1694 Demont and also Mr. Wessi n with development of the property. Said i t would affect the property if it is designated for Park and Church, = it does affect the development of property. He commented on the history of the development of his property on Cope Avenue. _ Bill Burns, 2527 Bittersweet Lane, commented on the development of He thought LB was the correct zoning for the property. Business offices would operate from 9 - 5, would not require a lot of access to the property. and would make good neighbors Chairman Axdahl closed the public hearing portion of the meeting. The Commission. discussed with Secretary Olson what procedures the Church would hc ve to follow to make it conforming with the zoning Code. The- Commission indicated a conditional use permit would have be approved by the Council. Commissioner He j ny moved the Planning Commissi recommen to the. City Council_AplEoval of the amendment from RH to LSC for that portio of the area that is zoned LBC. The - por i on o the property the is zoned R -1 change to the land use designation of RL except for tha portion east of Four Sea Park designated as park* property_ to remain a is. Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes- -Commi ss i oners Axdahl , Barrett, Hejny, Pel l i sh, Si gmundi k, Sl etten, Whitcomb Nays--Commissioners El l efson, Fi scher Mr. Zappa said the City should not force people to move into areas such as the one west of White Bear at Mesabi. s 8. C. Plan Amendment - -RH to LSC (Gervais Avenue West of White Bear Avenue) Commissioner Schmit moved and Commissioner Zugschwert seconded to concur with the staff report recommendation of June 9, 1983 to retainthepresentRH, residential high density land use designation, based upon the following justification: The land use element of Maplewood's comprehensive plan is based in part on the housing and human rights goals contained in the plan. These goals respect the right of each individual to live in decent 'housing, and provide for a maximum choice of housing types and location, both rental and ownership. Our dedication to these goals is presently being tested. Recognition must be given to the fact that Maplewood's densities for all classes of residential areas are lower than the average density in similar classifi- cations in the metropolitan area. Further, for a variety of reasons, over the past years a shift has occurred in the number of acres available for the various housing densities. of acres % of acres. % of acres R. L. R. M. R. H . Original 77 17 6 Present 81 1 6 Further erosion of the land available for hi gher.- densities will be occur - ring in the near future as a result of council initiated plan amendments . If the integrity of the plan, and its commitment to the human rights and housing goals is to be retained, land plan changes which remove acreages from any density should be counter - balanced by a . corresponding move of other acres into the density. Thus, when considering a change from one land use to another, equal consideration must also be given to what other location would b.e more appropriate for the existing designation. The site north of Gervais Avenue, west. of White Bear Avenue, is convenient to a park and a church, and would be excellent for multiple dwellings. Traffic can flow on to Gervais Avenue, not through a residential neighbor- hood. The topography, trees and proposed trail can act as a buffer to the north. Locating another RH site which has these characteristics would not be easy. For these reasons, the HRA is in agreement with the staff report that the site is well- suited for residential development and should remain planned as such. lotion carried unanimously, In the event the Council determines that the plan. amendment from RH to LSC is warranted, Commissioner Schmit moved and Commissioner Zugschwert seconded to recommend that Council table any further r action until the impact on housing plan goals is evaluated. Motion carried unanimously.. Commissioner Schmit was requested to attend the Council's 6 -97 -83 meeting to present the above recommendations. Commissioner Zugschwert agreed to serve as an alternate in the event Commissioner Schmit cannot attend. 3 l MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner SUBJECT: Ordinance Amendment - -Signs in Residential Zones APPLICANT: City of Maplewood = tkctilon by Council: DATE: June 17, 1983 j Endorse SUMMARY Rejecued Dat e..,_, On 6- 13 -83, Council gave first reading to an ordinance amendment dealing with signs in residential districts. Refer to ordinance alternative II, pages 5 to 7 of the attached memorandum. Four votes are needed.for adoption. i F w MEMORANDUM TO: City er FROM: Manager Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate PlanSUBJECT: Ordinance Amend Planner Amendm in Residential ZonesAPPLICANT:City of MaplewoodDATEJune20, 1983 Regrest ' l has requested that staffCouncil • i n nci residential draft an ordi to ermi t s ' -enti al districts , but onl b co p signs for i nst tuts onsyyconditionalt onal use permit. Reason for Change The current sign ordinance • n does not allowow s i gns for churchstitutions. The result i s vari anc es schools or other hardship unique to a requests without there being a justifiablehepropertyunderconsideration. Alternatives In order of preference r 1. Allow signs for institutions up . to 32 square f •feet as permitted s z gnage. Staff and the Community Design R •ew Board recommend this alternThirty-t y n . 9 . Ze compara Review square feet s a s araofthecitiessurveyed. P b1 e to those allowed i n the majoJor1ty 2. Allow Signs up to 24 s^uar . . 32 square feet _ 4 C , Cep in area by a sign permit but signs uqwould-be allowed only co g p to would .not be allowed y_a , n width* conditional use permit. Such signstoexceedsixfeetig 3. A - 1 s'i grts_ of up to 32 square feet, but on •use permit. ly by condi t4 onal Comments The advantage of the conditionall use permit i s that Council calocatandquantityofinstitutional n control thelsigns. The disadvantages are: 1• A six to eight week time de •delay for gettinging a decision fromtimewouldbe .spent -for staff - revs Counc i . Thy sew, review by the Community Desi n Review9etheCityCouncil Board and a public hearing before g 2• It-o s expensive for a non rof ' • fee p i t , t. The c organization , such as a churchoracondtonalusepermit. to Pay thecostisgenerallyabout $200.00125.00 for the condition •al use permit and approximate)abstractors l i st) . y $75.00-for an 1 p 3. The conditional use permit procedure would create unnecessary xtra work-y load for the city and applicant, A compromise, stated as alternative #2 would save some city time by allowing smaller signs without a conditional use permit. Recommendation Approval of proposed ordinance amendment Alternative I. - F 2 REFERENCE INFORMATION Existing Code Refer to the enclosed amendment. Past Actions I. Counci 1 has approved sign variances for the following facilities a_. 2- 20 -79: Gladstone Community Education Center to erect a 26.4 squareA.foot ground sign. b. 8-6-81: Health Resources, Inc. to erect a 40 square foot ground sign. C. 10- 25 -82: Sun -Ray Montessori School to erect a 32 square foot groundsign. d. 12-13-82: Trinity Baptist Church to erect a 28 square foot ground sCouncil-also directed staff to prepare a code amendment to allow signsforchurchesandschools. 2. 4- 12 -83: The Community Design Review Board recommended approval of Al tern -. ati ve I. 3. 5-9-83: Council referred this sign code amendment back to staff for revision to allow institutional signs only by conditional use permit. Surve Refer to the enclosed survey of surrounding communities closest to Maplewoodinpopulationandofadjacentcommunities. Of the communities surveyed which have specific size requirements, the average9maximumsizesignforachurchorschoolis30squarefeet. Procedure 1. Recommendation by the Commun Design Review Board 2. Public hearing by the City Council. 3. Second reading by the City Counci (at least four votes requiredred foraapproval).PP . ) ic Enclosures: 1. Alternative I (sign ordinance) -- permitted signs u to 32 squarepqe feet 2. Alternative II (sign ordinance)-- permitted signs up to 24 square feet 3. Alternative II (conditional use permit ordinance) -- permitted signs up to 24 s q . ft.4. Alter III (sign ordinance) -- C.U.P. required for signs up to 32 s . ft. 5. Al ternati ve. III qconditionalusepermitordinance) -- C.U.P. required for signs u9 P to 32 square feet 6. SLtrvey 7. Community Design Review Board Minutes 3 Alternative I ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 36 OF THE MAPLEWOOD CODE RELATING TO SIGNS IN.R -1, R -2 AND R -3 DISTRICTS The Maplewood City Counci hereby ordains as foll additions areunderlinedanddelarecrossedout) : t Section 1. Sections 36 -3 - ' •16 to 36 318 of the Maplewood Code are i sherebyamended . to read as fol l ows : Section 36 -316. Permitted. The only signs which are permitted in an R -1 Residence District Single Dwelling),.R -2 Residence District (Double Dwelling) or R - Residence District (Multiple Dwelling) in the city are as follows: 1) Signs permitted in Schedule I, subdivision I of this divi as _regulated therein. 2) One fascia sign of not more than two (2) square feet in areaa giving the name and occupation of the occupant of a buildingcarryingonahomeoccupationasdefinedinthecityzoningordinance. 3) One bus4R er 4deRtff4eat4en fascia or freestanding identification sign of not more than eight (8) square feet in area for each street frontage frent4Rg en each street wh4eh beuRds a let 4R for an apart-P ment d4str4et or townhouse complex - - -- 4) One fascia or freestanding identification sign for each streett frontage of not more than eight -84 thirty -two 32 square feet in area for aR a apartment ba4ld4R9 church, school , l i brar , community center derf}tery bR }t fraterR4ty or serer4t y beuse similar use in a residential district. (Ord. No. 427, - 818.170 Schedule - II (1)), 7- 14 -77) Section 2. Section 36 -318 of the Maplewood Code is hereby deleted. Seet4eR -36 -3187 'Max 4aum-number-ef -s iq Rs . 1R - Ease - shall - the - Reber ef s4gRs per bu4ld4R 9 - exceed ene - iR - aR R- 1- Res deAEe D Dwell }RgIT- R- 2- Res4deRee- D4str4 Deuble DweTl4Rg)- er -R -3 - Res }deAEe- Distr4et -¢Mul t le - Dwell4RP g4-4Rthee7 {Ord 7-Ne7- 4273 -8*187178- SEhedule- 113 -, - 7- 14 -77) Secs. 36 -319 318 - 36.328. Reserved, Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect after its assa a and publication.P 9 Passed by the City Council of the city of Maplewood, Minnesota this day of 19830 ATTEST: Mayor Ayes -- Na Attachment 1 City C er 4 y s -- Alternative Ii ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 36 OF THE MAPLEWOOD CODE RELATING TO SIGNS IN R-1. R -2 AND 'R -3 DISTRICTS The Maplewood City Council here ordyy ns as fol 1 ows are under-lined and deletions are crossed out) : Section 1. Sections 36 -316 to -36 -318 of the Maplewoodpewood Code are is herebyamendedtoreadasfollows : Section 36 -316. Permitted, The only signs which are permitted in an R -1 Residence District (SingleDwelR -2 Residence Di (Double Dwelling( or R -3 ResidenceDistrict (Multiple Dwelling) in the city are as follows: l) Signs permitted in Schedule I, subdivision I of this divisi as regulated therein. 2) One fascia sign of not more than two (2) square 'q re feet n area givingngthenameandoccupationoftheoccupantofabuildingcarryingonay9homeoccupationasdefinedinthecityzoningordinance. 3) One bus4eess -er -4 deetff4Eat4er fascia or freestandin identificfica n f 9 ti on sig o not more than e (8) square feet i n area for each street ontuye frent on - eaeh- street whieh-oeurds-a- let - tR for an arV%,A nt d4 s tr4 Et - o r townhouse comp 1 ex . 4) Ore fasEa- er- freestand }n - 4dent}f eat - - _ _g ee s }gr of rer sere _ tbae- e4gbt - {84square- feet - gin -area - fer- ae- apartffleet- buIding ; - derf4ter - 11e }t - -fr 'er- serert - pease- e -a -r _ y atere }tyyes }derta dstrEt-Signs u to 24 square feet maybeallowedsnpermitforchurchesschoolslibraries, commun i t y centers or any other institution. Signs from 25 to 32 feetonlybeallowedb shall conditional use _ permit. Such signs shall not exceedsixfeetinwidth. Section 2. Section 36 -318 of the Maplewood Code is hereby deleted. SeeOee -36- 348-- -Max 4muffl- mwFRber -ef - gRs- In Ease sha the nafliber- ef- s4ges- perQ- bu4d4ng- exceed ene- 4e -an -R -I- Res 94str4Et-{ 84noTe- 9we41 }eg4 R- 2- Res denee- 9str4et- 9euble Dwel er - R 3 Res4deeEe- 94str4et- Multple- 9well4n -ie- the -E4tg . y Secs. 36-349- 318 - 36.328. Reserved. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect after its passage and publication. Passed by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, t h i s day of , 1983. Mayor r Atte=st: Ayes- - City Clerk Nays -- r i 6 Attachment 2 Alternative II (conditional use permit ordinance) ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE V OF CHAPTER 36 RELATING TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS The Maplewood City Council hereby ordains as follows (additions are underlined and deletions crossed out): Section 1. Section 36 -437 of the Maplewood Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 8) Planned- uR }t- develepfeRts- , kPY94- Signs larger than 24 square feet, but not exceeding .32 square feet in area for institutions in any residential district. 9) Planned unit developments (PUD). Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after its passage and publication. Passed by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota this day of , 1983. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Ayes-- Nays-- r Attachment 3 7 Alternative III (sign ordinance) ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 36 OF THE MAPLEWOOD CODE RELATING TO SIGNS IN R -1 ,R -2 AND .R -3 DISTRICTS The Maplewood City Council hereby ordains as follows (add are under -1 ined and deletions are crossed out) : Section 1. Sections 36 -316 te- 36 -318 of thee Maplewood Code are s herebyamendedtoreadasfollows: Section 36 - 316. Permitted, The only signs which are permitted in an R -1 Residence District (SingleDwelR -2 Residence District (Double Dwel t i n or R -3 R' _ 9 ResidenceDistrict (Multiple Dwelling) in the city are - follows: 1) Signs permitted in Schedule I, subdivision I of thi s divis ' regulated therein. ion, as 2) One fascia sign of not more than two (2) square feet i 'q n area givingngthenameandoccupationoftheoccupantofabuildingationa g on ahomeoccupationsdefinedinthecityzoningordinance. 3) One bus4ness- er- 4deRt }f}Eat4eR fascia or freestanding identificationgent f cat on sign of not more than eight (8) square feet in area for each street T r o n f' pA n Q ' Y` G Q Q C _ O C ... .}. t Z r - t. n . r . ... r Z ^ V+ -, " -.v„ a.u. • • v•• . •y en `aeh street .44co'S`bOLf1Q Q TVZ - i f an 0 fr.11itll !.d4 st or townhouse complex 4) One ase er- ffeestaadiRg- 4deet4f4Eat4eA -s R- of -Rer -per - - -g e tbaR egbt {83square- feet - 4R- a - fer aR- apartfli be4ld4Rg - derf4ery -dR +t -f ratern4t er serer4ty hedse 4R- a- res4deRtia - _d }std }Et. Signs up to 32 square feetinsizeforchurches, schools, libraries, commun i t centers or an other institution, upon the i y • p issuance of a conditional use permit by the Council. Ord. No. 427, § 818.170 (Schedule II (1), 7- 14 -77) Section 2. Section 36 -318 of the Maplewood Code is hereby deleted. Sect4eR -36 -318: -- Max4meni ReHibeir ef s4gRs- 4R -Re- Ease- shal4 the- RdFfiber- ef- s40Rs- per- build4R - exeeed -eRe- 4R- aR-R - I- Res4denEe - 94str4Et - ( SRgIe 9well4Rg3 ;- R- 2- ResdeAee- Distriet- 9euble DweJl4Rg) er - R - 3 - Res 4deREe - 84str }Et- (Multlple- 9welI4R -iR- the -Cit .g y4Ord: - Ne - -427 - $4 8 :178 (Sebedel a - Secs. 36 -319- 318 - 36.328. Reserved. s Attachment 4 8 a Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect after its apublication.ication. p ssage and Passed by the City Council ofb the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this day of , 19830 Mayor 1 . Attest: Ayes- - Cty Clerk Nays-- i t 9 Attarhman+ A Alternative III (conditional Use permit ordinance) ORDINANCE N0. tr AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE V OF CHAPTER 36 RELATING TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS The Maplewood City Council here ordains . a f (additic; Y y s of1 ows s are under- lined and deletions crossed out) : .z Section 1. Section 36 -437 of the Maplewood Code is . hereby amPy ended _ to read as fol 1 ows : 8) P4anned- un4t- develePflieRts- PU947 Signs of u to 32 s uare feet 'P q et in size for institutions in any residential district. 19 _ ) Planned unit develop PUD . Section 20 This ordinance shall take effect afters its passage and publication. Passed by the City Council of the Ci of Maplewood', Minnesota this day of 1983. Mayor Attest: Ayes- - City Clerk Nays r - j t 10 Attachment 5 SIGNS - RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Survey of Metropol itan Communities Closest to Maplewood in Population Attachment 6 11 Institutional Signs Municipali lChurches, Schools) Maplewood Code does not address Coon Rapids 32 sq. ft. wall or gr4und sign per frontage Roseville 50 s uarq e feet Burnsvi No guidelines ' Plymouth 32 sq. ft. wall or ground sign- -one sign only Broukiyn Center One 36 sq. ft. ground sign9 plus one 32 sq. ft. wall sign per frontage _ Fridley ' .One 24 sq. ft. sign Blaine One 36 sq. ft. wall or ground sign per frontage New Hope One 20 sq. ft. sign per frontage Golden Valley One 35 sq. ft. sign White Bear Lake One 32 sq. ft. sign Apple Valley One nroundandonewallsigng at 40 sq. ft. each S. St. Paul Conditional use permit required for structure and signs Eagan One sign at 16 sq. ft. Maple Grove One sign - -18 sq. ft. Columbia Heights Two signs permitted at 32 sq. ft. Cottage Grove No limit to the number =.vf r signs, but together t may9 .Y .Y not exceed 100 sq. fr- X Shoreview One 24 sq. ft. round si n99 per frontage Attachment 6 11 Institutional SignsMunicipality (Churches, Schools Crystal 4 s q ft round Little Canada St. Paul N. St. Paul Oakdale Woodbury Newport t r g code doesdoes not address- wal- 1 signs - ADJACENT COMMUNITIES 24 sq. ft. One ground sign 30 sq. ft. One sign at 24 sq. ft. One sign per frontage at 24 sq. ft. - One sign at 24 sq. ft. 3 sq. ft. wall or ground t i 12 5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Sign Code -- (R -1 zone) A, The Board reviewed with staff the revisions made to the proposedordinance. They discussed what size signs would be ermip tted. Board Member Fol l ey_mo_v_ed the Boa rec to the Ci a proposed _-- -- - - tv councilp _ . p . _ revs s on_ to _ th s_ gn or the . Boa rd dina as reviewed and ame ed b z 7. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 8. BOARD PRESENTATIONS 9. STAFF PRESENTATIONS 10. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 9:55 p.m. s T 13 Attachment 7 LAIS, BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. ATTORNEYS.AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 5TH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 DONALD L. LAIS Action. by Council JOHN F. BAIANIGAN, JR. PATRICK J. KELLY Endorsedorse r Mo dif i e d.— r June 20, 1983 Reje%a C; Date Barry Evans City of Maplewood 1902 East County Road B Maplewood Mi 55109 RE: Bicycle Ordinance Dear Mr, Evans: AREA CODE 612 224 -3781 Please find herein revised copy of the bicycle ordinance. Thank you for your considerations* Sincerely, LAIS BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. Patrick J. Kelly PJK /pkg Enclosure ORDINANCE NO. AM ORDINANCE REGULATING THE A OPERATION OF BICYCLES r THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY O ARTICLE 8 Operation of Bicycles Section 18 -228 Traffic Laws Apply. r Every person operating a bicycle shall have all of the rights and duties applicable to the driver of any other vehicle by this chapter, except in respect to those provisions in this chapter relating expressly to bicycles and in respect to those provisions of this chapter which by their nature cannot reasonably be applied to bicycles. Section 18-228 Manner and number of riding. No bicycle shall be used to carry more persons at one time than the number for which it is designed and equipped, except a) on a baby seat attached to the bicycle, provided that the baby seat is equipped with a harness to hold the child securely . in the seat and that protection is provided against the child's-feet hitting the spokes of the wheel or (b) in a seat attached to the bicycle operator. Section 18 -229 Clinging to vehicles. No person riding upon any bicycle, coaster, roller skates, toboggan, sled, skateboard, or toy vehicle * shall attach the same or himself to any vehicle upon a roadway. Section 18-230 Riding on Roadway. A) Every person operating a bicycle upon a roadway shall ride as close as practicable to the right -hand curb or edge of the roadway except under any of the following situations: i) When overtaking and passing another vehicle proceeding in the same direction. ii) When preparing for a left turn at an intersection or into a private road or driveway. iii) When reasonably necessary to avoid conditions, including fixed or moving objects, vehicles pedestrians, animals, surface hazards, or narrow width lanes, that make it unsafe to continue along the right -hand curb or edge. B) Persons riding bicycles upon a road shall not ride more than two abreast and shall not impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic and, on a laned roadway, shall ride- in a single lane, C) A person operating a bicycle upon a sidewalk:, or across a roadway on a crosswalk shall yield the right of way to any pedestrian and shall give an audible signal when necessary before overtaking and passing any pedestrian. A person lawfully operating a bicycle on a sidewalk, or across a roadway on a crosswalk shall have all the rights-and duties applicable to a pedestrian under the same circumstances. Section 18-231 Carrying articles. No person operating a bicycle shall carry any package, bundle, or article which prevents the driver from keeping at least orie nand upon the handle bars or from properly operating the brakes of'-the bicycle. Section 18 -232 Turning and lane changes. An arm signal to turn right or left shall be given continuously during the last 100 feet traveled by the bicycle before turning unless the arm is needed to control the bicycle, and. - be given while the bicycle is stopped waiting to turn. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage and publication, as provided by law.., Passed by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota this day of 19830 Mayor Attest: Ci ty Clerk Ayes - Nays - 2- MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Barry R. Evans, City Manager SUBJECT: Phone System DATE: June 22, 1983 r f Action by Council :; Endorse Mod-if ie ......-. Rejected. Dat e_._---.____. We have been exploring for some time the possibility of changing our phone system to reduce costs. This has become even more of a concern with the breakup of A. T . & 7. To that end we have developed preliminary specifications for bidding. wever, it is obvious that the field i s very complex, not only from t standpoint of developing compl etel adequate specs , but • e Ho also in reviewing the sals that are given in the bidding process. It is becoming almos as complex as buy q computers. uters. Each vendor has his own little niche which p may or may not meet the C needs. Conse uentl we feel it may be in the City' - s best interest to secure a q y consultant. To that ..hat end I am attaching proposals from two such consul tants . I would refer you to page 1 of the pr000sal from Internationa l Telecommuni.- cation Consultantsnts which gives a good, * bri of precis of the benefits of an independent consultant. A review is still being made of their cost estimates and I w i l l have final figures on or before the meeting with a recommendation I A E 1 i. BRE:lnb Williom E. Schulz & Associates, Inc. may 25 , 198 3 Daniel F. Faust/Finance Director City of 11aplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Mikenas and self , we would like to thank youonbehalfofLeno , 5 1982. e cmunt of tine and information provided an y ,for th We found the meeting very informative and the information supplied to us by your office extremely helpful in preparing the following proposale h our detailed proposal, we would like to point Before proceeding with . assignments , we have p • dentified areas of savings available to our c that in the majority of our i out clients., which exceed our fee byli , a factor of more than two to one . Our proposal is in a single phase: asses the steps necessary to his phase enco prepare the Request s stem and review, evaluation. and For Proposal for a new telephone ' h the selec- ti uin of all responses* . This phase concludes with cri q g p City of Maplewood.tion. of a new telephone system for the y dap action within this step is pointed towards 1. Data Gathering - The i us win the necessary background information g prove. g present and future cormuanications needs. concerning the City of I.ap lewood s pr 1.1 We will review the current operations located in City Hall and the Public Works Building on County Road B. measurements of traffic within and between the 1.2 We will crake mea locations. This will be done with. a variety o f methods at our disposal and within our expertise. 3 We will utilizeize the inventory figures provided by • the City in place.of Map lewood , of telephone instruments currently p 1.4 We will conduct interviews with various, agreed upon exec utives to determine the following points: K Williom E. Schulz & Associotes, Inc. Mr. D. F. Faust May 25, 1983 Page Two 1.4.1 Shortcomings of the existing systems* is for the new Data, Elec-1.4.2 Requlrerrn. y tropic Mail, etc. . 1.4.3 Growth expectancy and future City directions We will perform an irtegra ed long distance study1.5 W P to determine the most economical a ld beneficial to city of -Ma lewood) mixture of long distance lines and services for the new telephone system. The results of this step will be produced independently of the overall study* Architecture of the Sys tem - Based upon the results of our 2 0Arc1 _ . _ • to provide a data gat erin.g we will e in. the posits p recommen dation, upon the architecture of the new telephone system. provide at that time the alternative2.1 We will also p methods of satisfying that recommnded architectures We will also p rovide our recomrren.ded method. d the systemtem architecture and the 3 , Based upon. data gathered y • method of . a roads, we will prepare a detailedreconnendedpp Request for Quotation for a new telephone system fo r the City selected vendorslewood. We shall also prepare a list of ,of Iap capabilities . and the who in our opinion have the resources , capab system to meet the M. 4. We will present the Rj.FQ and the list. of selected vendors to y yyouforour approval and additions j de letions . 1 based on our final version. of the Request for 5 . We wz.l , issue the _ forQQuotationandthelistofselectedvendors, is s a return date of some 4 -5 weeks from, date of issuance . 6. When all tFQ s have been issued, we will conduct a vendors conference within two weeks of issuances When all responses are received we will perform the following7., . functions Williom E. Schulz & Associotes, Inc. Mr. D, - P. Faust May 25, 1983 Page Three 7.1 We Will review and critique proposals received from all vendors. 7.2 T 47e will check them for thoroughness, completeness, accuracy and applicability. 7.3 We will compare vendor responses to the specifications of the new system. 7.4 We will prepare a check list and invite each vendor to respond to any changes or revisions in the proposed system. When all vendors have responded and jhave submitted any additions, deletions '. and or changes in e ui rent or costs, we will make a -final critique*q p 7.5 We will prepare cash flows for each vendor.. and pro- vide the City pofMaplewood with information relating to the results of the cash flow comparisons amongst the vendors , and the current costs. 7.6 We will review each vendor's capability as to equipment, maintenance, service, response tine and costs, 7.7 He will prepare a report taking the results of steps 7.1 through 7.6 and formulate the information into an analysis of each vendor. We will also provide a reconn as to which particular switch /vendor, , in our opinion, will provide the best equipment, the best service at the lowest cost for the City of L iaplewood. 8. Any changes in quotes will be critiqued and reported to the City PofhLa. lewood along with our final recommendation. The final decision on which mgi.tch is to be chosen rests with the City of m- aplewood. 0 This assi nt should take 12 to 14 weeks for compettion. For your information, the scheduling looks like this: Data Gathering Development of Specification Finalization of Specification Amber of Weeks 1 2 L 1 Williom E. Schulz & Associotes, Inc. Mr. D. F. Faust May 25, 1983 Page Four Nunnber of Weeks Vendor Response 4.5 Critique Evaluation. 4 Analysis & Report 2yP TOTAL 14.5 We should P oint out that some points may be accelerated, e. g. Data Gathering, Development & Finalization of Specifications, we will attempt to do so. T ere will be a maximum. of 56 may. hours requiredeestzmatethatthere . lete all steps of this phase. Our correspondent fee will to comp p P not exceed $4,200. Our fee is payable as follows: 15ao upon. signing of Contract - Y630.00 The remainder to be billed can a monthly basis. as work is cc7rnp leted, me assure you, s ea1dn as a principal of William E. Schulz Let y P g • Associates Inc. , that should you engage us for this as s igment , the final results will meet the highest professional standards* ILt • 'n,q .. Williom E. Schulz & Associates, Inc. tir D. F. Faust May 25 , 1983 Page Five To start this assignment, kindly sign and return one copy of this agreement together with your check for $630. Understood &Agreed for CITY OF MAPLLrMD By Title Date TrJFS/ jb Understood & Agreed for WM. E. S & ASSOCIATES, INC. William F. Simon Title Vice President /Yddwest ... Late .."" International Telecommunication Consultants Communication Specialists 11 Black Oak Road, St. Paul, MN 55110 612) 483 -3899 June 20, 1983 Messrs. Barry Evans and Dan Faust CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Mn. 55109 Gentlemen: Thank you for your cooperation and time on Wednesday when we discussed the current communication facilities for the City of Maplewood. Following is a summary explaining the impact of the deregulation on the business customer and an outline of the services ITC will provide. Because of previous similar projects, I feel confident that ITC can p rovide a thorough and complete telecommunication consulting service for the City of Maplewood. I am looking forward to working with both of you. ncerely, Nancy Taerud President International Telecommunication Consultants Communication Specialists 11 Black Oak Road, St. Paul, MN 55110 612) 483 -3899 TELECOMMUNICATION CONSULTING PROPOSAL For CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Prepared By International Telecommunication Consultants June 20, 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS I THE ADVANTAGES OF USING A CONSULTANT II DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES III TERM OF AGREEMENT ADVISORY CAPACITY FEE REFERENCES Page Number 1 - 4 5 - 6 7 u THE ADVANTAGES OF USING A CONSULTANT . IN A DEREGULATED TELECOMMUNICATION ENVIRONMENT Currently there are numerous factors affecting the telecommunications industry. On the level of society as a whole, there is an ever - changing, fast paced environment. As the pace quickens and tech - nology becomes more advanced, people find themselves in the midst of turmoil and confusion. This becomes apparent when personnel strives to keep up with itself through the design of systems created to move the correct information through the correct channels, to the right person, and at the right time as quickly as possible. The problem that once these systems are created, people must be made aware of their availability. Also, they must determine which systems is best suited for their current AND FUTURE NEEDS. However, unless a firm is large enough to have personnel who specialize in the telecommunications field, most firms do not have the time needed to learn what they need to know about telecommunications in order to make an accurate decision concerning a telephone system. CONSULTANTS MAKE IT THEIR RESPONSIBILITY TO KNOW WHAT SYSTEMS ARE AVAILABLE, AND MORE IMPORTANTLY, T HE CAPABILITIES AND HOW THEY PERFORM IN EACH UNIQUE ENVIRONMENT. THROUGH THE CONSULTANTS KNOWLEDGE OF MANY SYSTEMS, THE NEEDS OF THE CLIENT ARE MATCHED TO THE CORRECT SYSTEM. CONSULTANTS PROVIDE OBJECTIVE TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE IN THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATION. THEY DO NOT SELL ANY EQUIPMENT OR REPRESENT ANY PRODUCT LINE. RECOMMENDATIONS ARE TOTALLY OBJECTIVE WITH ONLY THE CLIENTS BEST INTERESTS THE GOAL OF ANY STUDY OR RECOMMENDATION. 1 - In the telecommunications industry itself, the greatest changes are coming about in the form of deregulation. Over the past two decades, the telecommunication* industry has been undergoing a continual deregulation process in the interest of increasing competition. The outcome has been an open market in the area of equipment, and by 1984, an open market in the area of service. Beginning on January 1, 1984, the AT &T divestiture will render the Bell Operating Companies as separate entities, apart from AT &T. The purpose of the break -up was to open the door for unlimited competition. There has already been a drastic increase in long distance competition with discounters such as MCI and SPRINT. With all of these changes coming about so quickly, the result has been a greater confusion on the part of consumers. In addition to increasing rates, deregulation i also bringing about new billing systems and a barrage of available hardware and service offerings. In regard to rates, the FCC ordered that, in conjunction with the AT &T breakup, a minimum charge of $2.00 per month be added to every residential phone and $4.00 per month be added to every business phone. These costs were previously absorbed by long distance rates. Now, the idea is that customers will have to start paying for having a phone that is capable of long distance calling. In connection with this will be new systems of billing which may involve up to three phone bills every month; an increase in the number of equipment vendors, each of which will be constantly updating and changing current systems as well as developing new systems and an increase in the number of telephone companies, large and small, offering different services. All of these changes, in addition to those already in effect, such as freeing consumers to buy their own phones, have left many ATT customers bewildered. And, more confusion is inevitable as X_ competition becomes more fierce and the ways in which people have done business with the phone companies in the past are altered. 2 - With all of the systems, services and cost saving methods becoming available, there is a dire need for expertise in the telecommunications industry to assist the business person, in making the right decisions. Deregulation of the telecommunications industry has resulted in an increase in competition in the telephone industry. As consumers are being bombarded different vendors and telephone companies, they are beginning to realize the need for the objective and unbiased recommendations of independent consultants. As a result, telecommunication consultants are becoming more and more common. SUPPLIERS AND VENDORS OF TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OFTEN TEND TO OVERSELL THEIR PRODUCTS OR FAIL TO EVALUATE ALL POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS THAT MAY SATISFY A CLIENT'S NEEDS, CONSEQUENTLY, THE CUSTOMER OFTEN BUYS A SYSTEM WHICH REPRESENTS A SUBSTANTIAL CAPITAL INVESTMENT BUT DOES NOT FULFILL HIS EXPECTATIONS. BY USING A CONSULTANT WITH A WORKING KNOWLEDGE OF MANY DIFFERENT SYSTEMS AND SEEN IN A VARIETY OF ENVIRONMENTS AND APPLICATIONS, THE CLIENT ALSO ELIMINATES THE RISK OF INVESTING IN A SYSTEM THAT WILL BE OBSOLETE LONG BEFORE IT IS PAID FOR. With Northwestern Bell's new subsidiary, American Bell, now respon- sible for marketing hardware, i.e., telephone systems,they are not a neutral or unbiased supplier of equipment. They have a product to sell and considered an interconnect company just as any other supplier of telephone systems. am 3 - 4 In a recent consulting project, prior to my being hired as their advisor, a client had requested information from various telephone system vendors so that he could obtain an approximate budget figure to present for the new telephone system. After being hired as their advisor I reviewed the proposals he had received from the suppliers and I discovered that the systems were not only inadequate to handle their needs, but one of the vendors had first of all quoted on a system configuration that was not possible. Secondly, had the client selected to install this system, he would have immediately been at capacity and would not have been able to add either trunk lines or stations. This, indeed, would have been a costly error. IN MOST CASES, THE COST SAVINGS CREATED THROUGH THE USE OF AN EFFICIENT TELEPHONE SYSTEM FAR OUTWEIGHS THE COST OF USING AN INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT. 4 - DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED By INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION CONSULTANTS Y 1. Data Compilation a) Review the existing telephone system b) Review current Northwestern Bell telephone statement c) Perform a station survey I. Evaluate current problems and needs of personnel. Productivity will be analyzed as it relates to telephone 'system usage efficiency. 2. Long Distance Evaluation Because long distance charges are presently not a concern, I will not use any consulting time on this project. However, if at a later time you would like to have an evaluation, I will be happy to do so. Most present PABX systems have facilities for providing long line usage control, such as management reports, station message detail recordings and toll restriction. If long distance usage does become a concern at a later date, the new PABX will have the option of being upgraded to handle this needs. 30 Telephone System Design a) Based on the determinations as a result of the station survey, a recommendation regarding PABX architecture and design will be prepared. am 5 - DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED (continued) 4.. Request for Proposa T a) A detailed specifications and feature list for release to qualified vendors will be sent. I. Prior to the vendor responding with their proposals, I will have them briefly tour the facilities. This, of course, will be done in a timely manner. b) Review proposals received from vendors for adequacy, correctness and conf irmance to specifications. 5. Perform a Financial Analysis in concurrence with the financial staff. 6. Vendor Conference 7. MM == a Recommendation regarding the selection of a new telephone system and appropriate contractual terms 8. Oversee the implementation of the new system TIMETABLE FOR THE CONSULTING PROJECT The tentative timetable beginning with station interviews through the implementation could take approximately 12 - 16 weeks. There are some time variables in co- ordinating with Northwestern Bell and the ordering and installation of the new telephone system. Term of the Agreement Duration of the consulting service as an independent contractor fOr the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD commences with the approval of this agreement and terminates one week after the cut -over the new telephone system. It is a service of thiscompany to have periodic follow -up for several monthssucceeding the installation of the new system. Advisory Capacity Throughout the course of this agreement, a limited involvement by the client is necessary to meet the clients objectives. International Telecommunication Consultants will provide our best opinions and recommendations and devote our best efforts to the work described in this agreement. However, final de.disions are the responsibility of the client. The fee for services described in Section II will not exceed $4,500 Time charges are accumulated and billed on the 30th of the month. 20% of the fee is required at the time this agreement is approved. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD By- Title INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION CONSULTANTS By Title Date Date 7 - 2 Commercial Systems in Minnesota for 1982 -1983 Division Stampings Lake City State Bank Land -O -Lakes Dakota County Ceta Albertville Elementary School South Central Electric Association Twin Cities West Union 76 Auto and Truck Stop Westin, Inc. NW National Bank Weisman Enterprises C -F Industries Channel 29 Tennant -Hoyt Americ Inn Wautonwan Farm Service Northland Glass Minnetonka High School and Administrative Offices RPfPrPnnP_q Weisman Enterprises /Best Vendors Diane McMullen 872 -1000 NW National Bank Doug Laumeyer, VP 437 -4242 Dakota County Ceta Percy Zachary 437 -2822 Westin, Inc. J Karen Becker 1/507- 375 -3101 8