HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983 05-23 City Council Packetu! r ..w O+ 4 uI3' 'Y ; a r'r.'• "!M K' ?'l .. . ' +S` "+:'i%I"... 'd:•V :mdR Yy1 .. ... .. .. .. .Y r .v .. '! .rc... _.. - . .... 3n K._ ar... st`T J{: - . }..
tt ... .. ... ... _ .. .., .,. ...... ., ,..- - .. , .. .. .,... ,.
y. a ., _ ,. .:. ;. ,.
GC. }OF : : ,.AWAR D I ; _.i v
f : .. .}
I . :. _ „.P ck, u ;'r .ucks
Fr o $ t ve ..A . R .econs tr _uct on. Concurrence _.
UN FI LN SHE D BIS INESS
c
1.: ... _ -rd i nance o A- .o sh: In urance Comm ttee 2nd Ready n
2. , _ _P UD Armen dment.Mar land o F .:Y t rndale _ . .
3. - Code.Am _endmen M ,, . . . ,etal Bui l d n 2n - Rdgad n9. . -: 9
V -
4. . . _ -Variance . _,24.83 Hw . 6 C Zuercher ,. _ .:Y 1C _ :. _
Nate - ona1 F r - .e Code. 2nd Readi n g
6. Bud a ::hC an e.9 Watershed Assessments -. _ -
tv ew Dr ve7. = - _Cres -Wa rm i n : :: -e. a: . ,..
1
r -
I: NEW BUS I NESS .
1. Plan -Amend en 2 _075.. Prop er - Rd..R _ y ..
d . Am nCoe _ e dment.A ends x. E --- -:S r -nkl ers .: .P p
T. ES EN'AT I ON j ,, :.a
K .I - =RCOUNCL_ P ESEN7ATION =S
1
2
5'.
6
y ..
AJ .
F
MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
s Monday, March 14, 1983
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 83 -06
Mayor John Gre presented a proclamation to the Hill Murray High School Hockey Team for
winning the State Hockey Tournament,
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council
Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7:06 P.M. by Mayor Greavu.
B. ROLL CALL
John C. Greavu, Mayor
Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember
Gary W, Bastian, Councilmember
Frances L. Juker, Councilmember
MaryLee Mai da, Councilmember
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
1. Minutes of Meeting No. 83 -03 January 24, 1983
Councilmember Bastian moved to approve the Minutes of Meeti No.' 83 -03 January 24,
1983 as submitted.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Councilmember Anderson, Bastian,
Juker and Maida.
Mayor Greavu abstained.
D. APPROVAL OF-AGENDA
Mayor Greavu moved to approve the agenda as amended:
1. Parking
2. Volunteerism
3. Interchange 694 & 61
4. Senior Citizen Sewer Rates
5. Commissioners
6. Letter of Appreciation
Seconded by Councilmember Mai da. Ayes - all.
E. CONSENT AGENDA
Council removed Item E -2 from the Consent Aaend to become Item I -7.
Mayor Greavu moved, seconded by Councilmember Bastian, Ayes all, to approve the
Cons
PP
Conse Agenda Items 1 and 3 as recommended.
3/14
a)
l . Accounts Payable
Approved the accounts (Part I. Fees, Services, Expenses, Check re '2 1983 - X202 220.57 • P
P ster dated MarchII - Payroll dated March 11, 1983 - $"'55 in the.amount of $257,623.75.
3. H.R.A. Resignation
Resolution No, 83 -3 -35
WHEREAS, Ronald Smith became a member of the Housing nd Redev •of Maplewood, Minnesota i n M a
9 ve oprnent Authors tyarch, 1.,82 and has served in that capacity to the presenttine, and
WHEREAS, he will not be available for reappointmentn •pp tment after the expiration of histerminMarch, and
WHEREAS, he has given of his time and energy without compensatio -of M p an, for the. bettermentoftheCityyMaplewood; and
WHEREAS, he has contributed his leadership and effort for the 'benefit of theCity
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the •Minnesota, and th C ty of Maplewood,,citizens of the City that Ronald Smith is hereby extended ourappreciationforhisserviceasaCommissioneroftheMaplewoodewoodHou -men t, Authority and we wish P Housing and Redevelopyshimcontinuedsuccessinthefuture.
F, PUBLIC HEARINGS
le P.U.D. Gervai s Overtook 7:00 P.M,
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a ubl i c hearing 'p gregardofMr. Richard Anderson for approval of a special use permit fora planned unitdevelopmentof42townhousecarriagehs9homeanddoubledwellingunits. The Clerkstatedthehearingnoticewasinorderandnotedthedaofubli 'p cati an .
b. Manager Evans presented the staff report.po t.
C. Commissioner Duane Prew presented the following Planningn Commission •9 o m ssi on recormendati on
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommendresolutionapproving approval of the
pp g a special use permitt for the Gervai s Overlook planned unitdevelopmentonthebasisthat: p
1. The proposal is consi with the rovi si ons of thp e Land Use Plan for clusterdevelopmentinalowdensityresidentialneighborhood.
2. The proposal is consistent with interim and ro osed sh •p p oreland regulations.
Approval is subject to:
1. The Community Design Review Board makin a finding that •
ati bl
9 g at the structureqbecompatibleewithneighboringdwellings.
2.Any conditions imposed by the Community Design Reviewyg Board,
3.Combination of parcels one and two.
2 - 3/14
4. Before final plat or building permit approval, the following conditions shall
be met:
a. Council awarding a construction contract for extension of sanitary sewer
to the site or approval of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
for use of their sewer i n Arcade Street.
b. The City of Little Canada ordering the extension of water to the site.
c. Final grading, drainage, and utility plans must be approved by the City
Engineer.
d. A signed developer's agreement, with the required surety, being submitted
to the City Engineer for the provision of on -site sanitary sewer, water,
and storm water drainage facilities.
e. Dedication of drainage easements to Ramsey County for County Ditch Seven.
f . Submission of a water quality management plan. The plan shall include
but not be limited to, a statement of the run -off retention methods to
be used to reduce potential water pollution during construction and after
construction i s* completed . This plan shall consider the recommendations
of the Soil Conservation Service.
g. Payment of deferred water assessment (Project 75 -16).
5. Construction of the first phase must be started within one year of Council
approval or the permit shall be null and void, unless an extension is granted
by the Council. The second phase shall beoi n within two years of the completion
of the first phase. If an extension is not granted, the permit for the second
phase shall be null and void.
6. Approval of homeowners' association by-laws and declarations by the city
attorney.
Commissioner Whitcomb seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl , Barrett, El l efson,
Fischer, Howard, Ki shel , Pel 1 i sh, Sl etten, Whitcomb."
d. Mr. Richard Anderson, the applicant, spoke on behalf of his request.
e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents, alone were heard.
f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. the following were heard:
Mr. Tim Murphy, 2756 Keller Parkway
Mrs. Kristine Novak, 2780 Keller Parkway
Mr. Bob Long, 2870 Arcade Street
Mr. Ed Berglund, 2800 Keller. Parkway
Mrs. Judy Rethke, 2828 Keller Parkway
Mr. Ron Brown, 2776 Keller Parkway
Mr. Willard Benker, 2786 Keller Parkway
Mrs. Kathryn Benker, 2876 Keller Parkway
A petition signed by the area residents was presented opposing the proposal.
3 - 3/14
g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
Ii. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the request of Mr. Richard Anderson for a Planned
Unit Development subject o the conditions i ste n t e Planning
recommendation with f7e excepts on of conai ion .
Seconded by Councilmember Mai da.
Councilmember Bastian moved to deny the Planned Unit Development as requested
by Mr. Richard Anderson ase on the in ings t -at the-proposal does not address
t - water pollution an the water run o r pro ems; that it does increase the
ve is a tray is on local streets; t at t e essentia pu is services, suc as
streets, ire protects on an u.t 7 i ti es are not a equate y provided; t a - the
use fails to incorporate all the natura an scenic features into t e esign;
that it as an a verse . envi ronmenta impact upon the existing area an tat t
as be- emons ±rate tat ere could a eoreciation of e surrounding property
due to a water run off pro ergs.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Counci 1 members Anderson, Bastian
and duker.
Nays - Mayor Greavu, Councilmember Maida.
vot. i ng on original notion as amended.
Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian
and duker.
Nays - Mayor Greavu and Councilmember Mai da.
2. Rezoning: Century and Larpenteur
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding rezoning
the northerly part of the Pri ory property from M -1, 1 i ght manufacturi ng, to R- 3,
residence district (Multiple Dwelling) ,. The Clerk stated the hearing notice
was in order and noted the dates of publication,
b. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
c. Commissioner Duane Prew presented the following Planning Commission recom-
mendation:
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning recommend to the City Council approval
of the resolution rezoning the northerly part of the Priory property to R -3.
Commissioner Sl etten seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl , Fischer, Hejny,
Pel 1 i sh, Sl etten, Whitcomb."
d. There was no one representing the Priory at the meeting.
e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard.
g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
h. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
4- 3/14
83 -3 -36
WHEREAS, the ir'apl ewood City Council initiated a rezoning from - '
to R -3 r "
om 1 lightmanufacturingresidencedistrict (multiple dwelling) for the north 840feetofthefollowingdescribedparcel:
Unplatted Lands subject to Century and Lar enteur Avenues hp th north halfofthenortheastquarterofthenortheastquarterandthesouthwestuarterofthenortheastquarterofthenortheastq
s quarter of Section 24- 29 -22;
WHEREAS, the procedural history of the rezonin is as follows:g
1. This rezoning was initiated by the Maplewoodewood Ci t '
ChaChapter = p y Council, pursuant to
p 36, Articlee VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planni Commis21i
p . g Comrr ss on on Feb
ruary ., 983.. The Planning Commi recommended to the Cit. Councilthatsaidrezoningbeapproved,
y c
9 pp
3. The Maplewood City Council held a publicc heari nP g on March 14, 1983. toconsiderthisrezoning, . Note ce thereof was ubl i shed and mailedtolaw. All P a11ed pursuantpersonspresentatsaidhearingweregiveanopportunitytobeheardandpresentwrittenstatementsTheCouncilalsconsideredreportsandrecommendationsofthecitystaffandPlCommion.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEW T00DCITY COUNCIL that the abovedescribedrezoningbeapprovedonthebasisofthefollo +wing findings of facC.
I. The proposed change is consistent . •9 w the spirit, purpose and ntentofthezoningordinanceandComprehensivePlan,
2. The proposed change will not substant' rsallyendureordetractfrom theuseofneighboringpropertyorfromthecharacteroftheneighborhood, _and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in theproposedchangeorplanisadequatelysafeguarded..
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests a 'and conveniences ofthecommunity, where applicable, and the p ublic welfare.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - Councilmember •s Anderson, Bastian,
d ulcer and Ma i d a .
Nays - Mayor Greavu,
3. Rezoning - Century Avenue ( Hi 1 icrest and N SP
a. N0yor Greavu convened the meeting for a publicc •p hearing regarding the proposedrezoningo , 1` the p
Railroad
ropert,o west of Century Avenue, north of r
propert Chicago Northwesternppetyfromi1 -2 Heavy Manufacturing to M -1 ht Manufacturing. Li .
ubl g TheClerknotedthedatesofpublicationandstatedthehearingnoticewasinorder.
b. Manager Evans presented the staff re ort.P
c. Commissioner Duane Prevt presented the Planning Commisssion
Commi Fischer roved the Planningr. . recommend -r g Cormi ss on r ecomr end o the City Counci 1approvaloftheresolutionrezoningthisareafromiii -2 to M -1.
5 - I /ln_
Commissioner Hejny seconded. Ayes - Commi ssi oners Axdahl , Fischer, Hejny,
Pel l i sh, Sl etten, Whitcomb.
Commissioner Pel 1 i sh moved that as Mr. Christianson has brought before the Commission
a natter for consideration for clarification of the status of the zoning on his
property, the Council direct the Planning Commi ssi on or staff to review the status
of the zoning of this property.
Commissioner Fischer seconded. Ayes - Commi ssi oners Axdahl , r i sche'r. Hejny..,
Pel 1 i sty, S1 ett`n, Whitcomb.."
d. An attorney representing Hillcrest Development Company spoke. He requested
that the property be correctly rezoned to R -3.
e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard.
g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
h. Counci lmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption
83 -3 -37
WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council initiated the following rezoni ngs :
1. M -2, heavy manufacturing to M -1 light manufacturing for the fol 1 woi ng
unplatted parcel: The easterly 1,003 feet of the southeast quarter of
the northeast quarter of section 24- 29 -22, except the land south of the
north l i n e of the Chicago-Northwestern railroad property, more .commonly
described as 1550 No. Century Avenue,,
2. The easterly 960 feet of the following unplatted parcel:
Except southeasterly 94 feet part northwesterly of centerline of most
northerly main track of C. St. P. M. and 0. Railway right of way of tract
compased of the fol l owi ng SE 1/4 of N W 1/4 NW 1/4 of S E 1/4 SW 1/4 of
SW 1/4 N 1/2 of SW 1/4 and except part i n E 97- 2/10 ft MOL to N SP Co.
as in DOC 1493718 the S 1/2 of NE 1/4 (subj to rds & esmts) in
Section 24- 2
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1. This rezoning was initiated by the Maplewood City Council, pursuant to
chapter 36, article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on Feb-
ruary 21, 1983. The Planning' Commi-ssion recommended to the City Council
that said rezoning be approved.
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on March 14, 1983 to
consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant
to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity
to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered
reports and recommendations of the city staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above
described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact
6 - 3/14
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent
of the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan.
2. The proposed change will not substantially inj or detract from the
use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood,
and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the
proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded,
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of
the community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson.Ayes - a11.
4. Rezoning - Century Avenue (Ivy to tracks) 7:15 P.M.
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposed
rezoning of the property west of Century Avenue, North of Ivy Avenue, from M-
2 Heavy Manufacturing to F Farm Residence and R -3 Mul Dwelling. The Clerk
stated the hearing notice was in order and noted the dates of publication.
b. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
c. Commissioner Duane Prew presented the following Planning Commission recommend-
ation:
Commi ssi oner Pel l i sh moved the Pl anni ng Commi ssi on recommend to the Ci ty Council
approval of the resolution rezoning this area from M -2 to F and R -3 consistent
with the staff report dated February 14, 19839
Commissioner Whitcomb seconded. Ayes - _Commi ssi oners Axdahl , Fischer, Hejny,
Pellish, Sletten, Whitcomb."
d. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the
proposal. The following expressed their views:
Mr. Richard Pearson, 1959 White Bear Avenue
Mr. Rich vanderhoff
e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
f. Councilmember Maida moved to approve the rezoning of the property as stated
in the staff report from - eavy Manu acturing to arm Resi ence an R _-7
esi ence Distri Multiple we ing.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - Councilmember Anderson, Bastian and
Mai da.
Nays - Mayor Greavu and Councilmember Juker.
Moti failed,
5.. Rezoning: East County Line Fire Department
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposed
rezoning of 1177 Century avenue from BC Business Commercial to LBC Limited Business
Commercial and R -3C Multiple Residence District (Town House). The Clerk stated,
the hearing notice was in order and noted the dates of publication.
b. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
7 - 3/14
c. Commissioner Duane Prew presented the following Planning Commission recommend-
ati on:
Commissioner Whitcomb moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council
approval of the resolution rezoning the two-lot fire station site from BC to
LBC, and approval of rezoning the two vacant lots north of the fire station site
to R -3C on the basis that:
1. The changes are consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the Zoning
Code and the Land Use Plan.
Z. The changes would not injure or detract from the use of the neighboring property
or from the character of the neighborhood.
3. The changes would serve the best interests and conveniences of the community
where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The changes would not affect the use of the property for a fire station.
5. The changes would be compatible with the adjacent residences.
Commissioner Barrett seconded. Ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Pellish,
Prew, Whitcomb. Abstained -- Commissioner Fischer."
d. Mr. Don Haue, representing the East County Line Fire Department, commented
on the proposed rezoning and asked questions of the Council.
e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard.
g, Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
h. Counci 1 member Bastian moved to table the proposed rezoning until first meeting
in September to allow the ast Cou nty ine ire Department time to either conso i ate
their lots or rep at, w is ever can be accomplished -ccomp is a wit the east cost
Seconded by Counci 1 member Anderson. Ayes - all.
6. Watermain Extension - Crestview Drive 7:45 P.M.
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding construction
of watermain improvements on Crestview Drive and Hudson Place. The Clerk stated
the hearing notice was in order and noted the dates of publication.
b. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
C* Assistant City Engineer Dave Pillatzke presented the specifics of the improve -
ments. The approximate cost of the project would be:
31.30.per front foot
860.00 for each service
d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents The following were heard:
Mr. Joe Boland 131 Crestview Drive
Mir. Gary Sherburne, 137 Crestview (in favor of project, opposed to price)
Henry P. Dembi czak, 140 Cresti vew Drive
Charles Ferrise, 170 Crestview Drive
8 - 3/14
e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard:
Ms. Myra Hirsch, representing Christ United Methodist Church
Mr. John Blumer, 175 Crestview Drive
Mr. gill Zappa, 230 Crestview Drive
Mr, Gerald Grant, 221 Crestvi Drive
Rev. Stuart Norris, 235 Crestview Drive, representing he A ostali BibleCollegPc
eg
Mr. W. L . Muir, 212 Crestvi Drive
Mr. Tom Morriott, 222 Crestview Drive
Mr. Joe Griemann, 185 O'Day (asked questions regarding the need for 'merit) g 9 the improve-
f. Chief Duane W i l l i a m s , East County Line Fire DeDar spoke regarding thelowwaterpressureinthearea. '
p
g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
h. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following esolution and 'g moved its adoption:
83 -3 -38
WHEREAS, after due notice of public hearing on the construction f 'o watermainimprovementsonCrestviewDriveandHudsonPlace, a hearing on said improvementinaccordancewiththenoticedulygivenwasdulyeldonMarchy .c 14, 1983, andtheCouncilhaheardallpersonsdesiringtobeheardonthematterandhasfullyconsideredthesame; s
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWO Da0 ,MINNESOTA,.s follows:
1. That it is advisable, expedient, and " necessary that -th 'y e City of MaplewoodconstructwatermainimprovementsonCrestviewDriveandHudsonPlaceasdescribedinthenoticeofhearingthereon, and orders the same tobemade.
2. The City Engineer is designated engineerneer for this improvementd'
g provement and isherebydirectedtopreparefinalplansandspecificatiforthemakingofsaiimprovement.g,
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ay - 'y Counclmembers Anderson, .
Basti Juker and Mai da.
Mayor Greavu abstained.
G. AWARD OF BIDS
1. EMS Portable and Mobile Radio 'Units
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
b. Mayor Greavu introduced the. following resolu and moved its adoption:
83 -3 -39
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF h3 •APLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bi dofMotorolaintheamountof $98,150 is the lowest r 'responsiblee bi a for the pur-chase of six portable and mobile EM S rad and the Mayor and Clerk .are hereby
9 - I /I A
authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on
behalf of the City.
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
2. Police Vehicles
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
83 -3 -40
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of
White Bear Dodge in the amount of $71,200 is the lowest responsible bid for
the purchase of eight 1983 Model patrol and paramedic vehicles and the Mayor
and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said
bidder for and on behalf of the City.
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Hazelwood Street Improvements - Feasibility Study.
a. Manager Evans presented the staff .report.
b. Mr. Pete Moritz, 2291 Hazelwood, spoke against the project.
c. Mr. William Gallagher, 2125 Hazelwood, spoke in favor of the project.
d. Councilmember Anderson moved to accept the feasibilit y report and to. order
a public hearing to be held at o n enn - Jr. - ig- arc at :
Seconded by Mayor Greay.0 . Ayes - Mayor Greavu and Councilmember Anderson.
Nays - Councilmembers Bastian, Juker and
Maida.
2. Maplewood Firefighters Relief Association
a. Manager Evans stated the Maplewood Firefighters Relief Association are re-
questing two By -Law changes and it is necessary to have these changes ratified.
b. Mayor Greavu moved to ratify the following two By Law changes to the Maplewood
Firefighters Rel Associ ati on
1 Article 6
Section 2 Service Credit
Each member wi 11 accumulate a service credit at the rate of $58.34 per month or
major fraction thereof, ($700.00 per year) . Maximum service credit after 30
years would be $21,000.00. Leave of absence will not count as service time,
and the service entry date will be adjusted accordingly.
2. Article 6
Section 4 Pension Benfits
10 - 3/14
Subdivision 1 Regular Pension
Subdivision 2 Early Vested Pension Benefit
Any member who has served more than ten (10) years of active service but less
than twenty (20) years may apply for early vested pension benefit. When the
member reaches the age of fifty (50) years they will receive their pension as
follows:
a. For duty of
more than 10 years, less than 11 years, 60%
11 12 64%
12 13 68%
13 14 72%
14 15 76%
15 16 80%
16 17 84%
17 18 88%
18 19 92%
19 20 96%
20 100%
b. The payment amount will be calculated by using the amount payable per
year of service in effect at the time of such early retirement, multipled by
the number of accumulated years of service, multiplied by the appropriate percentage
as defined in (a) above.
c. During the time a member is on early vested pension they will not be
eligible for the benefits provided for in Section 6.
d. All monies deferred under the early vested provision shall earn 5 %interest
compounded annually.
e. The effective date of th'i s provision is January 23, 1983.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Counci l members Anderson,
Bastian and Marda.
Councilmember Juker abstained.
3. Settlement - Walton
a. Councilmember Bastian moved to table for further clarification.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all.
4. Appointments - Boards and Commissions
a. Police Civil Service Commission
Councilmember Anderson moved to appoint William Mikiska to the Police Civil Service
Commission.
Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all.
b. H.R.C.
Councilmember Bastian moved to appoint Maria Larsen to the Human Relations Commission.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
11 3/14
c. Planning Commission
n'
1. Councilmember Juker moved to reappoint Paul Ellefson, Duane Prew and
Dave Whitcomb to the ann ng ommi ssi on .
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all.
2. Councilmember Juker moved to appoint Marvin Sigmundyk to the Planning
Commission to fill t o vacancy create y t e resignation o i i am
owar .
Seconded by Mayor Dreavu . Ayes - all.
3. Councilmember Bastian moved to readverti se for Planning Commission vacancies
for precincts 3, 7, 9, an
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
d. Community Design Review Board
1. Councilmember Anderson moved to appoint Thomas Dean to the Community
Design Review Board.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all.
2. Councilmember Bastian roved to readverti se for vacancies on the Community
Design Review Board.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all.
e. Park and Recreation Commission
1. Councilmember Juker moved to reappoint Joe Fox to the Park and Recreation
Commission.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes
2. Councilmember Juker moved to readverti se for vacancies on the Park and
Recreation Commission or Precincts L, 7, , an .
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - ail.
Council requested the reporter from the Maplewood Review to put an article
in the paper announcing there are openings on the commissions and boards.
Applications will be received until Apni 1 1, 1983.
f. H.R.A.
Councilmember Bastian moved to appoint Paul Zugschwert to the Housing and
ment Authority.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
I NEW BUSINESS
1. Code Amendment - Planning Commission Terms
12 - 3/14
a. Manager Evans presented a Code Amendment allowing
with an expired term to serve until a new appointment
This will allow the commission to have a quorum after
appointments.
b. Councilmember Bastian moved first reading of an c
a planning commissioner wit annexpire term to serve
or reappointment is ma e.
a planning commissioner
or reappointment is made.
terns have expired without
rdi nance which would allow
untiT a new appointment
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
2. Transfer of Funds - Nature Center
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
b. Councilmember Maida moved to approve a budget transfer of $2,40Q from the
Contingency Fund to the ature enter part time wages account.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all.
3. Frost Avenue - Birmingham to Adele
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
83 -3 -41
WHEREAS, the City Council has proposed that the area described as: Frost
Avenue between Adele Street and Birmingham Street be improved by construction
of street, storm sewer and related improvements;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA,
that the proposed improvement be referred to the City Engineer, who is hereby
instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council
in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and should
best be made as proposed, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended.
Seconded by Councilmember Maida.Ayes - all.
4. T.H. 61 Frontage Road - Hearing Date Project 80 -10
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
83 -3 -42
WHEREAS, the City Clerk and City Engineer have presented the final figures
for the improvement of the T.H. 61 Frontage Road, Project No. 80 -10;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
that the City Clerk and City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount
to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece
or parcel of land abutting on the streets .affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and they shall f i l e a copy of such proposed assess-
13 - 4/11
ment in the City Office for inspection,
FURTHER, the Clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify
the Council thereof.
Seconded by Counci i member Anderson. Ayes - all.
c. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption
83 -3 -43
WHEREAS, the Clerk and the Engineer have, at the direction of the Council,
prepared an assessment roll for the construction of the T.H. 61 Frontage Road
Project No. 80 -10, and the said assessment roll is on file i n the office of the
City Clerk;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
l . A hearing shall be held on the 1 l th day of April, 1983, at the City Hall
at p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and'
place all persons owning. property affected by such improvement w i l l be
given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on
the proposed assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at
least two weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners
of all property affected by said assessment.
3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time, and place of hearing,
the general nature of the improvement, the area proposed to be assessed,
that the proposed assessment roll is-on f i l e with the Clerk, and that
written or oral objections will be considered.
NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, will meet
in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 1380 Frost Avenue, at p.m. on .
April 11, 1983 to hear all persons concerning the adoption of the assessment
roll for Public Improvement No. 80 -10, T.H. 61 Frontage Road, Street, drainage
and utility improvements, and to adopt the assessment roll as presented or amended.
This hearing i s scheduled pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. The assess -
ment roll as herein described is on f i l e in the office of the City Clerk.
Area to be assessed: That area generally bounded by County Road C on the north,
T.H. 61 on the west, Gervais Avenue on the south and the
wetland area on the east.
All persons who wish to be heard, or to object with reference to this matter
may present their cases at this hearing, either orally or in writing. No appeal
may be taken as to the amount of any assessment adopted unless a written objection
signed by the affected property owner is filed with the City Clerk prior to the
assessment hearing or.presented to the presiding officer at the hearing.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to M.S.A. Section
429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk of the City
of Maplewood within thirty (30) days after the adoption of the assessment and
by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service
upon the Mayor or City Clerk.
14 - 4/11
Under provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 435.193 to 435.195 the City may,
at its discretion, defer the payment of assessments for any homestead property
owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to
rake the payments. The procedures for applying for such deferment are available
from the City clerk.
Dated this 23rd day of March, 1983.
s/ Lucille E. Aurelius
ity er ity - of Maplewood
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
5. Neighborhood Commercial District
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
b. Councilmember Juker moved first reading of an ordinance establishing a neigh-
borhood commercial zone t at is specs i ca y esi gne or ocati on within or
a acent to a residential desientia -i strict .
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
6. C arsgrove`s Meadows 1st Addition - Final Plat
Removed from Agenda.
7. Sale of Excess Property - Beam and White Bear Avenue
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
b. Councilmember Juker moved to authorize staff to determine a fair market price
and sell the excess City property on the sout west corner of ear" venue an
hate Bear AVenue.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian, Ayes - all.
J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
None..
K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Parking
a. Councilmember Juker stated she had talked to several of the police officers
who object to having to park at night on the west side of the building.
b.. Councilmember Juker instructed that the police officers who work the afternoon
and evening shifts be allowed to park in the east parking lot.
2. Volunteerism
a. Councilmember Mai da commented on the volunteerism program. She stated they
needed more business to become involved.
15 - 4/11
3. Interchange at 694 and 61
a. Councilmember Anderson requested MnDOT be advised that an interchange at
Highways 694 and 61 is needed, - especially when St. John's Hospital is finished.
b. Staff stated a letter had already been forwarded to MnDOT .
4. Senior Citizen Sewer Rates
a. No discussion.
5. Commissioners
a. Councilmember Anderson stated he felt that the money the Council donated
towards an appreciation dinner for the commission and board members should be
continued.
b. No action taken.
6. Letter of Appreciation
a. Councilmember Bastian moved that the letter of appreciation be forwarded
to Mr. Ed Ki shel as he has eci a to rest gn rom the anni ng ommi ssz on.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
None.
M. ADJOURNMENT
12:05 A.M.
ity Clerk
16 - 4/11
J
MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, April 11, 1983
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 83 -8
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council
Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7:01 P.M. by Mayor
B. ROLL CALL
John C. Greavu, Mayor Present
Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present
Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present
Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present
Mary Lee Maida, Councilmember Present
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes No. 83 -07 (March 28, 1983)
Councilmember Bastian moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 83 -07 (March 28,
1983) as corrected:
Page 13: Item I -8 "Seconded by Councilmember Anderson."
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - Mayor Greavu; Councilmembers Anderson,
Bastian and L:1,er.
Councilmember !'!ai da abstained .
D. APPR0VAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as' amended:
1. Interviews
2. 3M
3. Reporter
4. City Hall
5. Senior Citizen Sewer Billing
6. Storm Sewer
7. industrial Revenue Bond
8. Settlement - Beam Avenue
9, Used Police Vehicle
10. Bids - Public Official L i a b i l i t y Insurance
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all,
E. CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Bastian moved, seconded by Mayor Greavu, Ayes - all, to approve the
Consent Agenda, Items 1 through 6 as recommended:
1. Accounts Payable
1 - 4/11
accou ( Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses dated April 11, 1983 -
Approved the accou
182,159.33 Y : Part II - Payroll dated April 8, 1983 - $55,524.85) in the amount
of $237,684.18.
2. Revision of Special Assessment Interest Rates
Approved that the interest rate on new special assessment rolls be one percent greater
the the floating maximum interest. rate on bonds.
3. Donation
Council accepted a $100.00 donation from the Maplewood Coin Club to be used for the
Maplewood Heritagee Center and instructed a letter of thank you be forwarded*
4. Home Occupation: Time Extension
permit ears for a gunsmi thi ng shoptforfiveApprovedtorenewthehomeoccupationpeY
at 540 Ripley Avenue subject to:
1. The applicant obtaining an annual home occupation license from the city clerk.
2. Mounti ng the ten -pound A. C . f re exti n 9 ui sher on the wal 1 i n a 1 ocati on approved
by the Fire Marshal*
5. Maplewood Professional Building
appropriate City Officials to sign the standard agreement for khe
Authorized the approp y
s been constructed.
operation and maintenance of the private water system which has
on the Maplewood Professional Building site.
6. Transfer to Close Project 82 -05
Authorizedzed • a transfer f $124.72 from the General Fund to Project 82 -05 to close
o
the fund.
F. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7.00 P. M Liquor License - Ralph John Karczewski
locateda. Mayor Greavu convened the meetin for a public hearing regarding the request
of Ralph John Karczewski for an On Sale Intoxicating Liquor ,License to be 1 o
at the Maplewood Mall. The Clerk read the notice hearing and noted the dates
of publication.
b. Manager Evans presented.the staff report.
he ac . Mr. Ralph Karczewski, pp spoke on behalf of his request. p
u u called for proponents, None were heard.d. Ma p P
e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard*
f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
the9. Mayor Greavu moved to approve application of Mr. Ralph Karczewski for
de—
an On Sale Intoxi.ca i ng Liqu or iicense t De i oc azea at e ap i ewoo .a i •
2 _ 4/11
s Seconded by Councilmember Maida.
G, AWARD OF BIDS
1. Public Officials Liability Insurance
Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmember Maida.
Nays - Counci lmembers Anderson, Bastian
and duker.
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
b. Mayor Greavu moved to award the bids to Great Southwest for the Public OfficialsLiabilityInsuranceCoverage.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all.
F. PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued)
2. 7:15 P.M. P.U.D. Hazelwood Street Health Resources
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regardingn the reqofHealthResourcesforar
g g qapprovalofaconditionalusepermitforaplannedunitdevelopmentandvariancesfromparkingandminimumflarearequi
b. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
C. Commissioner Duane Prew presented the Planning ommission recommendation:9
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commissionon r •9 recommend to the City CouncilapprovaloftheresolapprovingaconditionalusepermitfortheHazelRidgeplannedunitdevelopment, including the following variances:
1. Minimum floor area variance to permit the Hazel Ride Coopera '9 pe atve residencetoofferone - bedroom units of 580 and 620 square feet and taro - bedroom unitsof803squarefeet. Code requires 650 and 880 square feet, respectively.velp Y•
2. A parking variance for 75 rather than the 150 spaces 'p required by code and55coveredspacesratherthan75asrequiredbycode.
Approval of the conditional use ermit including •p g variances is subject to.
1. The previously permitted community ervices r '
0 Y programs m continue to be offered
provided Council makes a finding that the use has had no adverse affect ontheneighborhood.
2. If Council determines there is insufficient on -site arki n for the cooperatio
p g p ve
residence, within one year of 95/ occupancy, additional parking ma be requiredYreq
3. Development of Parcel A shall requirere an amendment 'q ent to the planned unit develop-ment. The Director of Community Services should be notified of an proposeddevelopmentpriortoscheduling
y P p •
P g use of the softball facilities for an upcomingseason.
The following conditi shall be satisfied before the resolution is recorded •
3 - 4/11
1 . Handi cap parki ng requi rements shal 1 be met as requi red by the Uni form Bui 1 di ng
Code.
2. The City engineer shall approve final utility drainage and grading plans.
3. The Director of Community Services shall approve the location of the foot
trails.
4. The Director of Public Safety shall approve all on -site public safety - related
si gnage (stop, handi cap, fire lane, etc) .
5. The Community Design Review Board shall make a finding that the design isy9
compatible with the character of the zoning district.
6. Staff approval of the proposed owner's association by-laws to assure all
common areas are maintained.
Commissioner Whitcomb seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Prew, Barrett, Fischer,
Signundik, Whitcomb.
Nays - Commissioner Sletten."
d. Mr. Jim Swanson, Health Resources, spoke on behalf of the proposal.
e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard:
Mrs. Christeen Stone, 2727 Hazelwood Avenue.
g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
83 -4-
WHEREAS, a conditional use permit for the Hazel Ridge Planned Unit Development,
including variances for floor area and parking for the 75 -unit seniors residence',
has been initiated by Health Resources, Inc. for the following described property:
The North 800 feet of the South 1310 feet of the West 578 feet of the S W
1/4 of Section 3, Township 29, Range 22.
Such above property being also known and numbered as 2696 Hazelwood Avenue,
Maplewood Minnesota:
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit and variance
request is as follows:
1. That a conditional use permit and variance request has been initiated
pursuant to the requirements of sections 36- 438,36 -109 and 36 -122 of
the Maplewood Zoning Code;
2. That said conditional use permit and variance request was referred to
and reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on the 21st day of
Parch, 1983, at which time said Planning Commission recommended to the
City Council that said conditional use permit and variances be approved.
4
3. That said conditional use permit and variance request was referred to and
It
reviewed by the Maplewood Housing and Redevelopment Authority on the 8th
day of March, 1983, at which time the said Housing and Redevelopment Authority
recommended to the City Council that said conditional use permit and variances
approved;
4. That the Maplewood City Council held a public hearing to consider the condit-
ional use request, notice thereof having been published and mailed pursuant
to 1 aw; and
5. That all persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be
heard and /or present written statements, and the Council considered reports
and recommendations of the City Staff, Planning Commission, and Housing and
Redevelopment Authority.
WHEREAS, the variances requested in conjunction with the planned unit' develop-
ment as follows:
a. A parking space variance of 75 spaces, including twenty covered spaces.
b. A minimum floor area variance to permit one bedroom units of 580 and
620 square feet and two bedroom units of 803 square feet.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL, that the above
described conditional use permit and. variances be granted for the Hazel Ridge
planned unit development, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the previously permitted community services programs may be continued
provided Council determines that the use had no adverse affect: on the neighbor-
hood .
2. If Council determines there is inadequate on site parking for the cooperative
residence within one year of 95% occupancy, additional parking spaces may
be required.
3. Development of Parcel A shall require an amendment to the planned unit develop-
ment, The Director of Community Services shall be notified of the any proposed
development of this parcel prior to scheduling use of the softball/tee-ball
f a c i l i t i e s for an upcoming season. In addition, -he Director of Community
Services shall be i nel uded in the planning process for the development of
Parcel A as a recreational facility.. The Director of Community Services
shall approve the location of the foot trai 1 s and of the proposed use of
Parcel A as a recreational facilit
4. Right turn lane only when exiting the site.
Approval of the planned unit development. is recommended on the basis of the
following findings of fact:
1. The use conforms with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with the purpose
and standards of chapter 36 -348 of City Code,
2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the
public health, safety or general welfare.
3. The use would be located, maintained and operated to be compatible with the
character of that zoning district.
40 There is no evidence that the use would depreciate property values.
5 - 4/11
5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and
potential surrounding land uses, due to noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor,
fumes, water pollution, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness,
electrical interference or other nuisances.
69 The facility would have a minimal i mpdct on Hazelwood Avenue, planned as
a minor arterial roadway. The use would not create traffic congestion,
unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area proper-
ties.
7. The use would be served by essential public services, such as streets, police,.
fire protection,utilities, schools and parks.
8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost
for public f a c i l i t i e s and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare
of the City.
9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features
into the development design.
10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
11. Council and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority have given concept approval
for development of this site as the "frail - elderly" component of the HRA' s
tandem senior citizen /first -time home buyer housing program.
Approval of the variances is recommended on the basis of the following findings
of fact:
1. The zoning code does not consider the unique nature of parking space and
floor area requirements for senior housing, as such strict enforcement of
the code would constitute an undue hardship.
2. The variances are required for the reasonable and practical development of
the proposed seniors' residence and are not based solely on financial concerns.
30 The parking variance is less than that approved for Concordia Arms (50/ versus
59 %) . No parking problem has occurred at Concordia Arms,
4. If a problem were to occur, adequate room exists on the site to provide addit-
ional on -site parking.
5. The common dining, lounge and meeting room areas within the residence and
those accessible by tunnel in HRA' s office building compensate for the smaller
unit areas,
6. The proposed floor areas are consistent with similar seniors' developments
in the Twin Cities.
716 The vari ances will not constitute a threat of a substantive nature to the
inhabitants or adjacent.property owners.
Seconded by Council member Mai da. Ayes - all .
am 6 - 4/11
Councilmember Bastian m usedto end the Rules of Procedures and discuss Item
p
K -7 at this time.
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
7. Industrial Revenue Note
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
indib. Ma Y or Greavu moved that a letter be wri that the City Council
will consider Industra Revenue o n s as a way of financing t e proposea St.
Jo n s ospita .
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all .
F. PUBLIC HEARINGS ( continued)
3. 7.• 30 9Pri. - Rezoning: Larpenteur Avenue and Parkway Drive
r a public hearing .
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for p 9 regarding a request
ness Comrerci al ) to R -3 (mul ti pl a dwel 1 i ng) the
for a zone change from BC (Busi Cl erk stated
Ma 1 e Hi 11 s Gol f Course and dri vi ng range. The
property known as the p
the hearingng notice was in order and noted the dates of publication*
b, Manager Evans presented the staff report,
C. Comma ss Duane Prevr presented the foll Pl Commission recommend -
ation:
Commissioner Whitcomb moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council
approval of a resolution 9 PrezoningtheMaple Hills Golf Course and the Bennington
Woods property from BC business commercial to R-3, residence distr (mult
dwelling ).
d Ayes Commissioners Prew, Barrett, Fisc.her, -
Commissioner Sletten seconds Whitcomb.Sigmundik, Sletten.,
d. Mr. Dave Biggs Woodmark, Inc., spoke on behalf of the proposal.
e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
r opponents, The following were heard:
f . .Mayor Greavu called fo pp
d DriveMrs. Robert Johnson, 207 W. Kenwood , p resented a petition signed by
area residents opposing the rezoning.
Mr. Robert Anderson, 211 W. Kenwood Drive.
Mr. Curl Peterson, 1951 W. Kenwood Drive.
The resident at 734 E. Larpenteur .venue.
Yg•Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
7 _ 4/11
h. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption :
83 -4-
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC , business commercial
to R -3, multiple residential for the following described property:
Subject to roads and easements and vacated streets adjacent to: Southwest
triangular portions of lots 13 and 14, measured as 75 feet on southl i ne of
lot 14 to the northeast corner of lot 13; and all of lots 15 - 30 lot B MooW -es
Garden lots, except that part south and west of the following described line.
commencing at the southwest corner of lot 2, thence north 564.09 feet to
point of beginning, thence south 84 39" for 571.71 feet, thence S 17 45.5"
E for 20337 feet, thence S 74 42" E 172.71 feet MOL and except 98.5 feet
140L by 208.5 foot MOL tract adjacent to Parkway Drive to road, beginning
at the southwest corner of lot 2, thence east on the south line of said lot
417.61 feet, the ce north 224.55 feet, thence north N6 1 g" east for 210.22
feet thence N 17 45.5 W for 197.52 feet, thence N 84 39 W for 541.37
feet to the west line of lot 2, thence south on west line 564.09 feet to.
beginning, Moores Garden Lots, Section 17, Township 29, Range 22;
This property is also known as the Maple Hills Golf Course and driving range.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning i s as follows:
1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter
36, article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Mpalewood Planning Commission on Parch
21, 1983. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that
said rezoning be approved.
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on April 11, 1983 to
consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant
to 1 aw. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity
to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered
reports and recommendations of the city staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE t CITY COUNCIL that the above
described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent
of the zoning ordinance and Comprehensive Plan.
2. The proposed change w i l l not substantially injure or detract from the
use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood,
and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the
proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of
the community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
Seconded by Counci 1 member Mai da. Ayes - all.
4. 7:45 P.M. Assessment Hearing - Project 80 -10
a. tlayor Creavu convened the meeting for the assessment roll for Trunk Highway
8 - 4/11
61 Improvement Project 80 -10. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in order
and noted the dates of publication.
b. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
C* Assistant City Engineer !have Pi l l atzke presented the specifics of the proposed
assessment roll.
d. City Attorney Patrick Kelly explained the procedures of the assessment hearing.
e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard:
Mr. John Matson, 1230 E. County Road C
g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
h. Counci 1 member Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City
Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment
for the construction of the T.H. 61 Frontage Road as described in the files of
the City Clerk as Project Number 80 -10, and has amended such proposed assessment
as it deems just;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto
and made a part hereof, it hereby accepted and shall constitute the special
assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein
included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement
in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 19 years, the first of the installments to be payable
on or after the first Monday in January, 1984, and shall bear interest
at the rate of percent per annum from the date of the adoption
of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added
interest on the entire assessment from September 10, 1983, until December
31, 1983. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest
for one year on all unpaid installments,
3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council to reimburse
itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement
pai d for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments, on notice
and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties
abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting
on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when
changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible.
4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which
may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or
improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed therefore, it
is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council, as authorized
by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the City by addi n
9 4/11
any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of
such later extension or improvements.
5. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assess-
ment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of
the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in
the same manner as other municipal taxes.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian.Ayes - all.
i. Council established April 25, 1983 as the date to hear any assessment appeals.
5. 8:00 P.M. Alley Vacation between DeSoto Street and Burr.Street
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the requestofMr. Walter Laszcwski to vacate the alley lying directly east of DeSoto Street
between Kingston Avenue and Ripley Avenue. The Clerk stated the hearing otice
d
g
was i n order an noted the dates of publication.
b. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
c. Commissioner Duane Prew presented the following Planning Commission recommend-
ation:
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council
approval of the resolution vacating the alley except that part abutting lots
six and seven.
Commissioner Whitcomb seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Prew, Barrett, Fischer,
Si gmundi k, Si etten Whitcomb.
Commissioner Whitcomb roved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council
approval of the resolution vacating the alley abutting lots six and seven, subject
to either
1. It is verified to the city by property stakes or survey hat the garagea on9
1771 Burr Street is at least five feet from the west property line, or
2. If the garage does exist within the limits of the expanded lot, a variance
for the five foot setback req.ui cement is obtained or
3. A deed from 1778 DeSoto Street is resented to the city deeding the 7.5 feetpY9
of the alley abutting lots six and seven to 1771 Burr Street
before recording the vacation.
Commissioner Fischer seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Prew, Barrett Fischer
Si gmundi k, S1 etten, Whitcomb,"
d. her. Walt Laszcwski , the applicant, spoke on behalf of his request.
e. Mayor Creavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the
proposal. The following expressed their opinions:
Mr. Al Griggs, 1771 Burr
Mrs. Mary Schrenkl er, 1778 Burr
10 - 4 /11
A _ f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
g. Council member Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
83 -4-
WHEREAS, Walter Laszcwski initiated proceedi nos to vacate the public interest
in the following described real property:
The alley in block five, Kings Addition to the City of St. Paul, lying
between . the south line of Ripley Street and thr north line of Kingston
Avenue, except that part abutting lots six and seven and lots 24 and 25
WHEREAS, the following adjacent
Lots 1 -5, 8 -23 and 26 -30, block
WHEREAS, the procedural history
1. This vacation was initiated
2. A ma j on ty of the owners of
a petition for this vacati o
properties are affected:
5 Kings Addition-to the City of St. Paul..
of this vacation is as follows:
by Walter Laszcwski on February 18, 1983;
property abutting said alley have signed
n•
3. This vacation was reviewed by the Plannin Commission on Marcy 21, 1983.
The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that this vacation
be approved;
4. The City Council held a public hearing on April 11, 1983 to consider
this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law.
All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard
and present written statements. The Council also considered reports
and recommendations of the city staff and Planning Commission.
WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above described alley, public interest in the
property w i l l accrue to the following described abutting properties:
Lots 1 -5, 8 -23 and 26 -30, block 5 Kings Addition to the City of St. Paul
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood City Council that it is in
the public interest to grant the above described vacation on the basis of the
following findings of fact:
1, There is no need for a public alley over this right-of-way.
Seconded by Counci 1 member Mai da . Ayes - all .
6. 8:15 P.M. Rezoning: 1685 White Bear Avenge - Kentucky Fried Chicken
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a proposal
to down zone the property at 1685 White Bear Avenue from BC, business commercial
to R -1 single residence district. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in
order and noted the dates of publication.,
b. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
11 4/11
c. Commissioner Duane Prew presented the following Planning Commission recommend-
ation:
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council
approval of the resolution rezoning this site to R -1, residence district (single
dwelling).
Commissioner Barrett seconded.
Discussion as to whether the land use designation and the proposed zoning is
appropriate for the property.
Voting on the motion: Ayes - Commissioners Fischer, Barrett, Si gmundi k
Nays - Commissioners Prews, Sl etten, Whitcomb.
Motion fails."
d. Mr. j. E. Brill, Jr., attorney representing Kentucky Fried Chicken, 1685
White Bear Avenue, spoke against the proposal.
e. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to. be heard for or against the
proposal. The following were heard:
Mr. Carl Kircher, 1709 White Bear Avenue
Mr, Harry Jonsson, 1717 White Bear Avenue.
f, Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
g. Councilmember Anderson moved to deny the request to down zone the property
at 1685 Whi to Bear Avenue from to RI an to ref er back to anni nn Commi ssi on
t o question - of zone ng the property to BC—MIT
Seconded by Counci1member Maida. Ayes - all.
Mayor Greavu moved to suspend the Rules of Procedures to discuss Item
I -3.
Seconded by Council member Bastian, Ayes - all.
I, NEW BUSINESS
3. Ide Street Parking Restriction
a. Manager Evans presented a 1 etter from several property owners on ide Street
north of Frost Avenue requesting reconsideration of the Council action to restrict
parking. Staff has attempted to notify all the affected owners of the meeting.
b. Mrs. Donna Funk, Gladstone House, and Mr. Tire Klein, Ide Street, stated their
positions.
c. Council member Bastian moved to reconsider the previous action taken by the
Council to place No Parking signs on Ide Streeffor certain hours.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu, Ayes - all.
d. Counci lmember Bastian moved to suspend the Rules of Procedures and p l a c e d _______
1 / .-4/t
y "
No Parking" anytime signs on the east side of Ide Street.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - ail.
H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1, Rezoning - Maryland Avenue and McKnight Road
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
b. Councilmember Anderson moved to rescind the action taken by the Council at
the last meeting.
Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all.
c. Councilmember Bastian moved to place this item on the May 9, 1583 agenda.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all*
2. Code Amendment: NC District - 2nd Reading
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption:
ORDINANCE NO.
DIVISION 5A. PAC NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
Section 36 -126. Intent.
The intent of this district is to preserve land for the use of businesses that
are compatible with adjacent residential land uses. Uses are limited to offices
and smaller retail uses that cater to convenience shopping. Pedestrian and bicycle
access are to be emphasized.
Section 36 -127. Permitted uses.
Any of the following uses provided that the floor area of all buildings in any
one NC zone shall not exceed 3000 square feet:
1. Bakery or candy shop for the production of goods sold on the premises.
2. Beauty parlor or barber shop,
3. Dry cleaner or l aundromat All odors must be controlled so as not to be
noticeable to adjacent residents.
4. Office or medical and dental clinics.
5. Repair shop, except for motorized vehicles. No work shall be performed outside
of the building.
6. Drug, hardware or grocery store.
7. Studio.,
8. Tailor or dressmaker shop.
13 - 4/11
C
9. Veterinary or grooving clinic where there are no outside kennels or storage.
9
Section 36 -128. Accessory uses.
1. Off - street parki ng .
2. Signs, in accordance with the sign ordinance.
Section 36 -129. Conditional uses (requires Council approval).
Any cf the following uses provided that the . f 1 oor area of all buildings in any
one N C zone shall not exceed 8,000 square feet:
1. Any permitted use listed in section 36 -127.
2. Club, lodge- or hall,
3. Private school, daycare center or community service use.
4. Taxi stand or bus stop.
5. Restaurant where there are no drive -up order windows or serving of food to
patrons in their automobiles. All cooking odors must be controlled so as
not to be noticeable to adjacent residents.
6. Similar uses to those listed in this section.
Section 36 -130. District standards.
a) Bike racks
Bike racks shall be provided in an area that. is convenient to each major
building entrance, but which will not disrupt pedestrian or vehicular traffic
or fire lanes.
b) Building design
Buildings in this district shall be designed
surrounding land uses. If more than one use
and organized as a unit . Pedestrians should
without crossing vehicular traffic lanes. T
other than a trash receptacle which shall be
36 -26 of the zoning code.
to be compatible with their
on a site, they shall be planned
be able to walk between stores
here shall be no exterior storage,
screened as required by Section
c) Lot coverage
At least 15/ of the site shall be landscaped.
d ) Building setbacks
1) The minimum building setback from a right -of -way shall be thri ty feet
and twenty feet from side and rear property lines,
2) adhere a setback is from residentially zoned property, the minimum re-
quired setbacks shall,be increased, not to exceed 75 feet, subject
to the most restrictive of the following requirements:
14 - 4/11
T
a. Building height: The building setbacks shall be increased two
feet for each one foot the building exceeds 25 feet in height,
b. Exterior wall area: Where an exterior wall faces a residentially
zoned property, the wall setback shall be increased five feet for
each 1,000 square feet, or part 4hereof, in excess of 2,000 square
f eet .
e) Parking and leading areas.
Paved areas shall be provided for loading and unloading of delivery trucks
and other vehicles, servicing of shops by refuse collection, fuel, fire,
and other service vehicles; automobile accessways; and pedestrian walks.
f) Plan review.
Plan approval is required from the Community Design Review Board. The city
may require appropriate conditions "Co ensure compatibility with the surround-
ing uses to include, but not be limited to, building height, setbacks, or-
ientation, parking lot location or location of building entrances or screening.
Section 2. This ordinance shall-take effect upon ;passage and publication.
Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all.
3. Inventory of Potential R -1 to R -3 Rezoni ngs
a. Manager Evans presented an inventory of undeveloped sites that are zoned
F -farm residence or R -1 single residence district and designated on the land
use plan for multiple dwelling development.
b. Council directed staff to establish hearing dates.
I. NEW BUSINESS ( continued)
1. Plan Modification - Project 81 -12
a. flanager Evans presented the staff report.
b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
83 -4-
WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered
rude Improvement Project No. 81 -12 and has let a construction contract therefore
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, chapter 429; and
WHEREAS, the construction plans and specifications have been previously approved;
and
WHEREAS, the engi veer has provided information relative to a plan amendment
that is in the best interest of the public;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWlOOD, MINNESOTA,
that the construction plans and specifications should be chanced to cause construct-
ion of sidewalk to be made along the south boulevard of Hol 1 oway Avenue from
15 - 4/11
McKnight Road to the westerly lot l i n e of the Ramsey County Open Space property
fi and along the north boulevard from Margaret Street to Century Avenue.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - ail.
2. Sterling Street - Holloway to Larpenteur
a. Manager Evans presented a letter from an area resident -requesting the City
reconsider its position on Sterling Street maintenance.
b. Councilmember Bastian roved to accept the letter and moved to table any action
until such time as the over ay program is considered
Seconded by Mayor Greavu . Ayes - all
4. Reconsideration - Hazelwood Street
a. Councilmember Juker presented a l i s t of questions that she would l i k e answered
before taking any further action regarding the Hazelwood project.
b. Councilmember Juker moved to instruct staff to investigate her requests and
submit a report
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
c. Mr. Bill Gallagher, 2125 Hazelwood..and Mr. Joe Saura, 2051 Hazelwood, discussed
the problems,
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
None.
K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Interviews
a. Council established interviews for prospective commission members on Wednesday,
6:30 P.M., April 20, 1983.
2. 3M Company
a. Council questioned what the settlement in the 3M case was.
b. Staff answered.
3. The Reporter
a. Councilmember Maida wished to thank the Maplewood Review Reporter, Jonathan
Clyde Glass, for all his efforts.
4. City Hall
a. Councilmember Anderson commented on combining City Halls.,
5. Senior Citizen Billing
a. Councilmember Anderson commented on how other cities handle senior citizen
billing.
am, 16 4/11
b. Staff will investigate.
6. Storm Sewer Assessment
a. Councilmember Anderson commented on his opinion that storm sewer assessments
should be on an equal basis.
L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Settlement
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
b. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the settlement in the amount of $3,000.00 to
Don M. Lattimore in regar s to hi s awsui t i nva vi ng ro ject -
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
2. Police Vehicle
a. Manager Evans presented the staff report.
b. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the sale of the Police 1981 Chevrolet station
wagon for $1,000 tote ar si de ire epartment
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes all.
M. ADJOURNMENT
10:49 P.M.
i y er
17 4/11
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 5/23/83 Page l
i
wrwr...wr•.. ..'. .W , a ...s.. ..la+n.. -mow .a. _.a.s- +rwwn. w.a r+r.-swscswrrwr-- ..rrrw•.
1983 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER
CHECK A0.DATE A M4UNT VENOCR ITEM DESCRIPTION
122100 05/11/93 203.00 BLUE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 95/11/83 - -203.00 BLLE CRCSS IhS PREMIUM -
12210t1 ____ - --05/11 /R3 203.00-BLUE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 05/11/83 494.84 BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 05/11/83 -494oR4 BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 05/11 /x3 _ ._ -- ..494.84-ellE CROSS I A S PREMIUM
122100 05/11183 27.72 BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 05/11/33 ---27.72 BLLE CROSS INS PREMLUM
122101?0 5 27072-ELITE CROSS IhS PREMIUM
122100 05/11/R3 55.43-BLLE CRCSS INS PREMIUM
122100 D 5/1 1 /83 --55..6.3 BLL E CROSS DNS PREMIUM
2100 05/11/83 55.43 BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 05/11/83 27,71 BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
1221 05/ 11/R3 - - - - - - ' - - -BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
722100 05/11/83 27,71 BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 5/11 /83 376.53-ELLE CRCSS INS PREMIUM
122100..05/11/83 - -- - - - - - -_ ---37 ___ -- -BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 OS/11r83 376.53 BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 05/11/83 110.86 BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 0511)/8.3 110.86-BLLE .CROSS -INS PREMIUM
122100 35/11/93 110.86 BLLE C ROSS INS PREM
122100 05/11/9-3 110.86 BLUE CROSS INS PREMIUM
1221011 05 /i1 /A3 _._ .8b__._.___BlIlE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 0 110.86-BLLE CROSS PREMIUM
1221011 05/11/83 110.86 BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 -05/ >> /83- - - - - -- __..---1! 0.st6:__ ....._..BLUE CROSS ItiS PREMIUM.,
122100 05 173942-BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
322100 05/11/83 173.42 BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
w'.ya ai " NMA.PMtom -- - M sYelr
9999 9999
i aal1 PAa .L Ylw a .t » ari7y
1983 CITY OF MAFLEW30D CHECK REGISTER
CHECK ISO.DA T':'-'AMOU VENDCR ITEM DESCRIPTION
122100 05,/11/83 173942 BLUE CROSS I PREMIUM
122100-5/11 /83 j -6.63 BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 05/11/83 16,63 BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 05/11/93 16 BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 05/11/83 -- - -- -155.48____ .-----BLIE CROSS . _--- - - - - --NS PREMIUM
12210n 05/11 /83 155948-BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122 05/11/R3 155,48 BLUE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 05/11/83 219 966 BLLE CROSS __ .__INS PREMIUM --
122100 05/11/83 219966-BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 05/11/P-3 219e66 BLUE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 -05/11/83 _ _ - -476.37-BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM - - - - --
122100 05/11/83 476937 ELITE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 05/11/83 476,37 ELLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 05/11/83 - -175.44-BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122101 05/31/83 175.44 BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 05/11/83 175.44 BLUE CROSS INS PREMIUM
12 21 Q 0 05/11/83 - - -- .__1 91 , 94 ELLE CROSS - - - - - -- - --INS P R E M I U M
122101 05/11/83 191994 BLLE CROSS INS PREMIU
122100 05/11 /R3 191,94-BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100. ._0 5/11-185 -- -191 .94 .BLUE CROSS-- ..-- - - - - -- .INS PREMIUM.._
122100 05/11/83 191994 ELLE GROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 05/11/9-3 191994 -BLUE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 05/11/83 ..R3. --ELLE CRCSS INS PREMIUM
122100 05/11/83 83.14 BLLE CROSS IAS PREMIUM
122100 05/11/83 83.14•BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 _05/11/83-55:43+BLUE -CROSS INS PREMIUM -- _
122100 05/11183 55.43 BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
12210P 05/11/83 55.43 BLUE CROSS INS PREMIUM
x
w. -. 'i %!.L.*C.r .f v..t:t{'w'Y.,YP..sy ... .,...e.c.- ....,. +.. -....r ... .. ... . ,u ..i xn ..
8.627.02 MN STATE. TREASURER M - CTOR VEH LIC PBL
L ._r .aw... -. ..r .... ... .. r.s,...s.w rwr- r...+ er.- ^va•w.+r..wsra_.. »....a.. er a. w...+. - w... s. arr..:r.w.... r.r- ...+...r w..w.. +.. a....ru.++r ..
1983 CITY OF NAFLE6OCp
5.814.65 MN
CHECK REGISTER
MCTOR VEH LIC P8L
122502 35111 /R3 270.00 MINN STATE TREAS DRIVERS LIC PBL
CHECK N0.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
122100 05/11/83 175.4 BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 - -05%11/83 175.441 BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM _
122100 05/11f$3 1 75 44 BILE CROSSCSS INS PREMIUM
122100 05/11/83 240.02 BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
122100 05111 /81 -_240.02 BLLE CROSS - -- -- - - - - -- -INS PREMIUM
122540 05/1'1 /83 7 913 1 MN
122100 05/11/83 240.02•BLLE CROSS INS PREMIUM
MN MUTUAL LIFE
3. 561.86
122540 05/11/83 319,1 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
12228?0 5/11 /83 9540 GOVT TRAINING TRAVEL TRAINING
122540 05/11/83
95.00
MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
122502 -_05 8.627.02 MN STATE. TREASURER M - CTOR VEH LIC PBL
122502 05/11 /83 5.814.65 MN STATE TREASURER MCTOR VEH LIC P8L
122502 35111 /R3 270.00 MINN STATE TREAS DRIVERS LIC PBL
122502 _05/11 /83 - --274.00 MN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC PBL
149985.67 +
t :.art
122540 05/1'1 /83 7 913 1 MN MU FELLIFE INSURANCE
122540 05/11/13 1 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
122540 05/11/83 319,1 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
122540 05/11/83 446.20 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
122540 05/11/83 129.18 MN MUTUAL' LIFE INSURANCE
12Z540 05/11/83-----------M_.3.60 - -._MN MUTUAL LIFc----- - - - - -- ----INSURANCE
122540 05/'11 /R3 9129e20 MN MUTUAL L I FE INSURANCE
122540 05/11/83 10 .42 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
it.PERA P
122557 05/11/83 4, 334.78 MN STATE TREAS PERA
122557 05/11183 18.22 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL
1983 CTTY OF PAPLEWOCD CHECK REGISTER
cCH hO.rDATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTlr0N
122540 05/11/.83 10.82 rN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
122540 05/1 1 /R3 45 --MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
122540 05/11/93 4505 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
122540 05/11/93 505.58 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
122540 -- -05/11183 2 417.O7 - - - - -- - - --MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANC
22540 05/11/179.43 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
122540 05/11183 251.16 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
122540 05/11/83 347 - .40 MN MUTUAL -:LIFE INSURANC
122540 05/11/93 12.62 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE-
122540 05/11 521 .67 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
122540 05/11/83 26fi.:._ -MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
122 540 05/11/83 12 3.61 MN MUTUAL LI FE I NSUR ANC E _
122540 05/110R3.67.16 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
122540 05/11/R3 _434.40 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
122540 05/11/R3 1120 MN MUTUAL L FE I SUR ANC EN-
122540 05/11/33 54.85 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
122540 OS/11/R3 - -- - -247.22 -- - -MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
122540 05 /11 /33 3.60 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
122540 05/11/83 123960 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
12254 05/11/83 131 __.__ ___MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
4122540 0 5 / 11 /R3 11 .46 FN MUTUAL LIFE I NSUR ANC
122540 05/11/445.88 PN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
122540 05/11/83 18.68 -MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
89912.33
it.PERA P
122557 05/11/83 4, 334.78 MN STATE TREAS PERA
122557 05/11183 18.22 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL
w..... .....,..._..........,....... .. .. - .. .. _r....... _ r.d:..:arr....., _r....__.... v.::..- ...x......:..rrw.r..:..r....r'i..w"r"+".+wasra.wa...L..._ r.f,..3 w.rr.... ...,. ... _.....,,.,
1083 CITY OF MAPLE60CD CHECK REGISTER
CHECK AQ.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
122557 05/11/83 44.99 -MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL
122557 -0 5111 /83 MN ST ATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL
122557 05/11/83 100.76 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL
122557 05/1i/83 173939 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL
122557 --115/1.1 /st3 --189.04 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL -_
122557 38919 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL
122557 0 5/ 11 /R3 53.61 MN STATE TREAS PERA PIRA PBL
122557 --05/11/83 - --145,45._MN STATE TREAS PERA -PERA PBL
1225-5 05/11/83 364.51 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL
122557 05/11/83 4013965 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL
122557 Q 5/'11!83 _ _ _____352.66 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL
122557 05/11M 261.60 SIN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL
122557 05/11/83 209927 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL
122557 05/11/83 182910 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL
122557 05/11 /8.3 129.52 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL
122557 05/11193 617.23 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL
122557 05/11/R,3 --329.74 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL
127557 05/11/83 35928 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL
122557 05/11/83 197 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL
122557 05/11 /83-- _-3020'12 M'V ST ATE TREAS SERA- ._._...PERA PBL
127557 05/11/93 79.31 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL
122557 05/11/83 126967 PN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL
122557 0 5/ 11 /83 -96 *R1 MN ST ATE TREAS PERA PERA PBLto
122557 05 /83 64.76 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL
122557 05/11/83 49.58 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PSL
122557 -- --05/11/83 -65.96 Mtn STATE - TREAS PERA --PERA PBL
122557 05/11/83 16.66 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL
127557 05/11/83 421 .79 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA PBL
wrw..tsr J y - s..
J .rr
1 983 CITY OF MSPLEWOCJ CHECK REGISTER
CHECK h3o DATE AMOUNT VENDOR --I TEM DESt.RIP TZ ON
122 557 05/11/83 119.%0 MN STATE TREAS FERA PERA PBL
1 ...
13154.86
i
mot
122c85 05/11/33 _ _I5 *000.00 -_.PATRI FERRAtt4 - - - - --SETTLEMENT
1230 05/11/93 62.40 THEOD CRE SCN_IO.R REFUN
62.40
124502 83 4974.58 MN STATE TREAS MOTOR VEH LIC PBL
1245x2 JS/11/83 24A.00 ION STATE TREAS DRIVERS LIC POL
5 9 2 2 0.5 R*
125502 05/11/83 5 MN STATE TREAS MOTOR VEH LIC_ --
125502 05/11/83 109.00 PN STATE TREAS DRIVERS LIC PBL
S 498 ,20
125 742 0 5 /11 /R3 8300 CLER OF O IS TR CT --CNTY DRIVERS LIC PBL
83.00
12h472 fl5/11 /R3 93s 787.28 METRO WASTE CONTR SEWER CHARGE
93* 787.28 i
a .. r .....N . sa. .,q -.v.. -. s_ ..•.- - . ..w ... .ir •fit wl<Yw". w'r Y._ J.Wasv- '..Mwp_ _
yaw,:. ...... -- ls.i•: . w.-..:..
uar.... alw• _ae 41RY.a. .r a_Y.aa aAl.aMy VNi.a
iidY4xax:,.:rL.= .-a..::... ...
Yawti..4.Mar.
aw.+.. -w
1983 CITY OF MAPL_rW0C0 CHECK REGISTER
CHECK N09 DATE.AM3UNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
126502 0 5111/2,, 556,75 MN STATE TREAS MOTOR VER LIC PBL
125502 05/11/A3 308.00 MN STATE TREAS DRIVERS LIC PBL.
129015 75 /11 /3 - - - - --324.20 AFSCME #2725- - - -_UNION DUES
129015 05/11/33 24.00 METRO SUPERB ASSN UNION DUES
129015 0 5 /11 /R3 5,32 AFSCM E#2725 UNION DUES
129153 05/11/83 -12 C TY —C RT Y EMP L C /U CR EO IT UN P8 L -
It
12.762.50
ttt.•
129167 0 5 / 11 R3 40.34-CONN CEN LIFE INS INSURANCE PBL
129167 05/11/13 606 CONN GEN LIFE INS INSURANCE PBL
129167 -5 /11 /$3 _ ._ _._ _ _1 8.52 CONK GEN LIFE I AS .. ---------INSURANCE PBL
129167 05/11/83 9. 88 CONN GEN LIFE INS INSURANCE PBL
129167 05/11 /$3 6.48 CCAN CEN LIFE INS INSURANCE PBL
129167 05/11/83 _52 -CONN GEN LIFE INS ---- ---- - - -_--INSURANCE PBL -- _
129167 05/19/93 28.46 CONN CEN LIFE IhS INSURANCE PBL
129167 05/11/13 24.04 CONN GEN LIFE INS INSURANCE PBL
129167 -__—05/11/$3 _._ _.13.60 ___ -CONK CEti LIFE I - -- --INSURANCE PBL
1291 67 05/11f%11.75 CONN CEN LIFE INS INSURANCE PBL
129167 05/11/93 60.92 CONN CEN LIFE INS INSURANCE PBL
j -: 7p .A_'I. M.. {........ ....- .4..F a .r. _._...•. - ;.. "R' i'wr w- _ n Y a -
a
i
1983 CITY OF MA FLEWO0D CHECK RcGI ST R
CHECK ISO.DATE AMOUNT VENDC ITEM DESCRIPTION
129167 d 5 /11 /#3 437.91 CONK GEN LIFE INS INSURANCE PBL
129167 --05/11 /83 38.17 CONN GEN LIFE INS INSURANCE BL
1291 05 /11/R3 27. 12 CONN GEN LIFE INS INSURANCE P8 L
129167 05/11/83 46,76 CONK GEN LIFE INS INSURANCE PBL
129162 _fl5/11j3_ -_.CONK GEN LIFE INS INSURANCE BL
129167 05/11/83 98.38 CONN GEN LIFE INS INSURANCE PBL -
129167 0 5/11/83 74.42 CONN GEN LIFE INS INSURANCE PBL
67 05/11 /83 CONK GEN LIFE INS _ - -__ -- . -I hSUR ANC E P8 L
129167 05/11/83 41.13 CONN GEN LIFE INS INSURANCE PBL .. __._
129167 05/11/83 58,88 CONN GEN LIFE INS INSURANCE PO L
129167 -05/11/835 /11 /83 8.10 CONk__GEN LIFE INS INSURANCE PBL
129167 35/11/A-3 25.75 CONK GEN LIFE INS INSURANCE P3L .•
129167 05/11/133 20076 CONN GEN LIFE INS INSURANCE PBL
129167 05/1'i /83 14.64 CONK LEN LIFE INS INSURANCE L
129167 OSI11lB3 11,33 CONN GEN LIFE INS INSURANCE PBL
11 /R3 14.96 CONN CE k L jFE INS INSURANCE PBL
129167 05l1/R3 3.66 CONK GEN LIFE INS INSURANCc P
a
1291 b?OS/ 11/83 71.70 CONN GEN LIFE INS ItiSURANCE PBL
1291 h7 05/11/83 27.30 CONN GEN LIFE INS INSURANCE PBL
S
129330 D5 //1 /3 573 ICMA FETIREMNT - - --DEFERR COMP
129 330 05 102.96 ICPA RETIREMNT DEFERR CO , MP. .-.---
676.20
129373 0 5 / 11 /83 145,00 ROSEMARY KANE P/R DEDUCT
r
y,'y
w w . .vr -,...a ..ar.•.a • vs.....ar >. .i o : :. w..• -. -e.. , ..a- mss...: v ....r ... r. .- ...r . .r.. .
1983 CITY OF MAPLEW000 CHECK REGISTER
HECK N0.DATE AMOUNT VENDCR - -- -ITEM DESCRIPTION
145.00
129453 05/11193 149058.36 MAPL.EWOCC STATE BK FWT PISL
129453 0S/11/83 - --187.50 PAPLE6000 ST BNK P.R DEDUCT
149245.86 •
129 50 2 05/11/83 4f 01 7.50 MN STATE TREAS MOTOR VEHt LI C PBL
i 1295 05/11/83 13300 MN STATE TREAS DRIVERS LIC POL
17954L}05/11 / , R3 310.00 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS INS PBL
310.00
129562 05111193 64000 Ph T aPSTERS_ - - - - -- -UATQN DUES
640.00
f # *ftf
129870 0 5 /11 /83 7.892.87 MN ST COMM REVENUE SWT PBL
7092.87 :
1290$7 05111/13 5 3.76 RAYMOAD F= R NQlr REFUND
53. +
1983 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NJ.DATE'AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
143008 05/12/93 4.14 ACE HARDWARE SUPPLIES
143008 05/12/83 16.94 ACE HARDWARE SUPPLIES
143008 - __ -_ -. --05112 /83 -- - --1D.88 -. __ - - --ACE HARDWARE SUPPLIES
14300'05/12/83 84.28 ACE HARDWARE SUPPLIES
116.24
143009 05/12/93 13 :28 ACRO• MINI E-SOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES
13.28 *
143052 05/12/93 --554.32 - -ARNALS AUTO SERVICE REPAIR MAINT VEH
1430 5 2 105/12/83 32965 ARNALS AUTO SERVICE REPAIR MAINT VEH
143052 95/12/83 32.65 ARNALS AUTO SERVICE REPAIR MAINT VEH
143052 05/12/83 _32.65-ARNALS AUTO SERVICE REPAIR MAINT WEN
143t!52 m -5 /12 /83 2b /5 ARNALS ARhLSUT S£ ICSERVIC R MAINTREPAIRI VEH
143052 05/12/83 3105 ARhALS AUTO SERVICE REPAIR MAINT VEH
143052 05/12 - I3 --265;b5 _.__._ - --ARNAL AUTO SERVICE -`- -R =P AIR MAINT VEH
143052 05/12/83 30.15 ARNALS AUTO SERVICE REPAIR MAINT VEH
143052 05/92/93 24925 ARNALS AUTO SERVICE REPAIR MAINT VEH
143052 05/12/R3 -------93900 ARIIALS AUTO SERVICE _ - --REPAIR MAINT VEM
143052 05/12/83 48.50 ARMS AUTO SERVICE REPAIR MAINT VEH
143052 05/12/13 80.75 ARNALS AUTO SERVICE REPAIR MAINT VEH
143052 05/12/83 80.95 --A ALTO SERVICE_ - -REPAIR M VEH
143052 05/12/83 21.75 ARNALS AUTO SERVICE REPAIR MAINT VEH
19290.57
143056 05/12/93 671 .80 ARTCR AFT PRESS T14C FINANCIAL REPORT
jUr
w.c:R'.R./ •s- .1.i_lvotr.../ .S.wr. -+[ t ti. MYW'r. •.YOIllirie.a....jMfA
IQ83 CITY OF MAFLE CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESURIPTION
b71 .80
143058 05/12/83 90.00 ARTS 70WING TOWING
90.00
143(130 05/12/3 --49.50- - --BATTER'Y ^ * TI - R - E - - -- -SUFPLIES- - - - - -
49.50
J
143089 05/12/ 3 43109 Bc'FG-TCRSETH INC SUPPLIES VEH
431.19 #
143il9 005/12/83 68.53 BILL FOYER IFCRO SLPPLIES VEH
143097 OSI12/R3.._ -.. --57.08-BILL FOYER FORC SUPPLIES VER
143097 Q 5 /12 /R3 598,88 BILL FOYE F CRD SUPPLIES VEH
143097 05/12!83 51.34 BILL BO FORD SUPPLIES VEH
bbl .67 f
143102 05/12/83 00 _ __.._ -8CARD OF WATER COMM PYM CONTRACT - -- - --
143103 05/12/83 21. - 97 BOARD OF WATER COMM PYM CONTRACT
143103 05/12/83 52.72 BOARD OF WATER COMM PYM C ONTRACT
s .-
CIO i•awwA.fTir + ..
I'r•aiYY•1•w••Y.
1983 C / TY Or MAFLEWOOO CHECK REGISTER
C *0.DA TE AMOUNT VENDCR ITEM DESCRIPTION
1 .
143115 05/12/83 61.55 BROWN PHOTO SUPPLIES
61 .5 5
143147 05/12/83 85.99 CHAMPION AUTO STORES SUPPLIES -
143147 05/12/ 3._--__.___-85 -.9 - -- -CHAMP ION 'A" TC STORc SUPPLIES
171 .9 8
S
t,t*
143155 0' 5/12 /83 1, 038 .99 CITY CF POUNDS VIEW _PYM_ CONTRACT_ _
143155 15/12/83 177.93 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW PYM CONTRACT
1921.92
143161 05/12/83._53 - -..CLUTCH -SLFPLIES VEH
5 3.50
143175 05/12./93 19100 COPY DUPLICATI'JG P - RO DUPLICATING COST'
191.30
143177 05/12/83 3.40 CCFY EQUIPMENT CFFICE SUPPLIES
143193- -05/12/83 _.3710.00 CALEY PAT PLUMBING INSF -
1913 CITY 3F M FL = 60 C C REGISTER
C h0.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
370.00
143194 05/12/83 14.88 FAUST DANIEL F TRAVEL TRAINING
14.8 8 #
14320.5 05/12/83 --17,- 075.50 -DELAHUNT VOTO CO ____ - - --PYM CONTRACT
17.075.50
fttt
143215 05/12/R3 40.00 DTAMOND RADIATOR REP -REPAIR MAINT VEH
143215 05/12/$3 250900 CTAMO *D RADIATCR REP REPAIR MAIN VEH
143215 05/12%83 -- - --35.00 - -DTAMON0 RADIATOR REP REPAIR MAINT VEH
325.00
143222 05/12/g3 163.91 EASTMAN KODAK CC DUPLICATING COST,
143222 05/12/83 4 EASTMAN KODAK CC DLPLICATING COST!
143222 - - --Q5/2/3 - - -- ---------EA K CC - - -- --DUPLICATING C
143222 05!12/83 363.73 EASTMAN KODAK CC DUPLICATING COST'
143222 05/12/83 378.72 EASTMAN KODAK CC DUPLIC COST.
14322? _OS /'f2 /R3 1 .3'5EASTMAH KODAK CC - -DUPLICATING COST%
143227 05/121R3 316.12 EASTMAN KODAK CO DUPLICATING COST:
143222 05/12/83 3.222.72 EASTMAN KODAK CC DUPLICATING COST!
143222 ^ _C5712/ 83 i 2. 2 N_KODAK CO DUPLICATING COST!
143222 05/12/83 322.72 EASTMAN KODAK CC DUPLICATING C_oST:
143222 05/12/13 3 EASTMAN KODAK CC DUPLICATING COST:
143222 Q5%12/83 227 ---EASTMAN KODA CC D UPLICATING COST:
3
i
1483 CITY OF MAPLEWOCO CHECK REGISTER
CHECK Nv.DATE -- - -- - - - -AMOUNT VEADC' - - - - --- - - - -... _._ - _ITEM DESCRIPTION
1
i 143237 05/12/83 97.65 FEDERAL LUMBER CO SUPPLIES
97.65
i
143255 -5/12/83 25.50 G +K SERVICES UNIFORMS
143255 05/12/83 25.50 G +K SERVICES UNIFORMS
143255 05/12/83 25.50 G +K SERVICES UNIFORMS
143255 05/12/83 . - -_ —_25.5 - -- - --G +K SERVICES - -- - - - -UNIFORMS
143255 05/12/83 19,20 G +K SERVICES UNIFORMS
143255 05/12/83 19,20 G +K SERVICES UNIFORMS
143255 05/12il3 19020 G +K SEAVTCES - - -UNIFORMS
143255 05/12/1.3 19.20 G +K SERVICES UNIFORMS .. ___.
143255 05/12/83 19010 G +K SERVICES UNIFORMS
143255 0OS/12/R3 -- -19.10 -G +K SER - VTCES -- -- - - - - - --UNIFORMS
143255 05/12/33 19,10 G +K SERVICES UNIFORMS
143255 05/12/83 1,9010 G +K SERVICES UNIFORMS
143255 _X5/12/83 18000 _____.._.__G +K - SERVICES UNIFORMS
143255 05/12/83 18000 G +K SERVICES UNIFORMS
143255 95/12 /R3 18.00 G +K SERVICES UNIFORMS
143255 X5/12183 18000 - -_SEAVTCES - --- -- - - -- -UNIFORMS
32 .20
143269 05/12/83 5088 GENUINE PARTS CO SUPPLIES VEK
143269 05/12/83 14 .17 GENUINE PARTS CO SUPPLIES VEH
24 /
9R1 .3 CITYTY OF FAFL EWO ^D CHECK REGISTER
CHECK No Oo DATE AMOUNT VENDCR ITEM DESCRIPTION
20.05
143276 05/12/ 1 3 53.04 GOODYEAR SERVICE STO SUPPLIES VEN
143276 05/12/13 28.0 - 0 Gt3CL1YEAR SERVICE STO REPAIR MAINT VEH
143276 05/12/83 4.50 GOCOYEAR SERVICE STO REPAIR MAINT VEH
143276 05/12183 10.01)GOCOYEAR SERVICE STO REPAIR MAINT VEH
143276 05/12/93 /12/83 203916 GOCOY EAR SERVICE STO REPAIR MAINT VEH
298 70 *
r
1432.5 05/12/13 315 ,00 GRACE DUANE C CONSU L.T - I NG INS
143285 05/1218 3 35 6.25 GRACE DUANE C CONSULTING I NSP
671.25 i
t :ft :t
1433 ^1 05/12/93 57..01)NEJNY RENTALS INC RENTAL
57000
43332 %OS/12'83 62940 IND SCHOOL GIST 622 PRINTING
143332 05/12 /S3 115.25 IND SCHOCL DIST 622 PRINTING
1433 2 05/12/13 964 -IND SCHOOL DIST 622 CUSTODIAL
1,142.57
91433 5 1)5!12/83 2.126.25 LAIS EANNIGAN +KELL MARCH SERVICES _
143395 05/12/83 11.25 LAIS BANNIGAN +KELL MARCH SERVICES
r .+iy'Y .wtu' u-a..y_•rwYU_
AM
p4R e_
1 / // .r•.Y_ - rVl9l'MIY•
d
19$3 - CITY OF MAFL_WOCD CHECK REGISTER
CNr _CK fib.0... TE AM• 0AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
143395 05/12/93 11.25 LAIS BANNIGAN +KELL MARCH SERVICES
143395 _____05/12/83 - -- --1 LAIS BaNNIGAh +KELL MARCH SERVICES -
143395 0 22.50 LAIS QANNTGAN +KELL MARCH SERVIC €S
143395 05/12/83 112,50 LAIS BXNNIGAN +KELL MARCH SERVICES
143395 5112IR3 303.75 LAIS FANNIGAN +KELL iMARCH SERVICES
143395 05/12/83 90.00 LAIS PANNIGAN +KELL MARCH SERVICES
1433 05/12/83 3 LAIS SANNTGAA +KELL 1WARCH SERVICES
b, 846.25
143396.05/12/83_ - - --4.2'000 --LAKE SANITATION RUBBISH REMOVAL
143396 05/12/83 127.50 LAKE SANITATION RUBBISH REMOVAL
169.5 0 +
t.f tt
143408 05/12/83 21.00 LAW EAFORCEMENT EQUI F m F en
143435 05/12/83 -16;62 NACOUEEK_ EQUIPMENT I SUPPLIES VEH
1 6.62
143440 05/12/83 14.28 FANDO PHOTO Fl.lm --Processing
14.28
4
143452 05/12/83 123,09 MAPLE 600D REVIEW PUBLI SHI NG
r
1993 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER
CH h0,DATE AMOUNT VENDCR ITEM DESCRIPTION
143565 05/12/83 40000 MITCHELL WINFIELD A PROFESSIONAL SERI
143 565 0 5/12/93 60.00 MITCHELL WINFIELD A PROFESSIONAL SER%
143565 35/12/83 9000110 MITCHELL. WINFIELD A PROFESSIONAL S R%
143565 05/12/R3 30000 MITCHELL WINFIELD A PROFESSIONAL_ SE - R1
r
143565 05/12/83 40.00 MITCHELL WINFIELD A PRCFESSIONAL SER1
143565 05/12/43 60,00 MITCHELL WINFIELD A PROFESSIONAL S R%
T
143565 05/12/93 290.00 MITCHELL WINFIELD A PROFESSIONAL SER`
1
143596 05/12/83 3.00-MUNIC ; PRIVATE SERV ANIMAL CONTROL
143536 05/12/R3 71 x.50 -MUNIC ; PRIVATE SERV ANIMAL CONTR CL
71
143592 05/12/P3 72.00 MUNIC ILITE CO SUPPL IES VEN
72.00
143647 05/12/83 53.10 NCRTH ST PAUL CITY UTILITIES
143647 05/12/83 li 475e22 - _.NORTH ST AUL CITY UTILITIES
1 , 528.32
143658 35/12/43 2.4 NORTHERN STATES PO1mE UTILITIES
143658 O5 /12 /83 8 N CATHERN STATES P06E UTILITIES
tr r,. +wN -'. iM!i.Cift"n4 r.: iWAf/t'a -sw :+lt'.it•.fiM.-'O:._c._.:4 !_.. • - ._ .
1983 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER
CHECK N0.DATE A M UN T VENDOR,a ITEM '' R POES„ _ t . TI 0N
143658 05/12/33 2,40-NCRTHERN STATES POkE UTILITIES
143658 05/12/ 8 3 786.92 -NCRTHERN STATES FORE - - - - --UTILITIES - -
143658 05/12/83 2.40 NCRTHERN STATES POWE UTILITIES
143658 05/12/13 2.40 NCRTHERN STATES FCkE UTILITIES
143658 fl5/12/83 -2 - 4Q -_NCPTHER - N --STATES POWE UTILITIES
143658 05/12/93 2.40 hCRTHERN STATES POWE UTILITIES
143658 05/12/93 3 NCRTHERN STATES P06E UTILITIES
143651 05/12/83 2 4U -- - - - -KCRT STATES PCk£UTILITIES
143658 5/12/83 2.40 NORTHERN STATES POWE UTILITI ES
143658 05/12183 36.05 NCRTHERN STATES POkE UTILITIES
14365?05/12183 129.42 NORTHERN STATES POWs UTILITIES
143658 05/12/93 414.14 NCRTHERN STATES POkE UTILITIES
143658 05/12/83 124.69 NCRTHERN STATES FOUE UTILITIES
143658 95/12/83 170.11 -NCRTHERN STATES P06E UTILITIES
143658 95112/S3 7.06 NCRTHERN STATE POkE UTILITIES
143658 05/12/13 7.06-NORTHERN STATES POkE UTILITIES
143653 05/12%83 - - --81 .95 -_.__h STATES P06E - -UTILITIES
143658 n 5/'12/83 4 25 RNCRTHE ATESTATES POT"c UT TIL ESI
143658 5/12/83 4,25 NCRTHERN STATES POirE UTILITIES
143658 05/12/R3 7#06 NORTHERN STATES POkE UTILITIES
143658 05/12/R3 4 25 NCRTHERN TA ESST P06E UTILITIES
143658 05/12/83 5.95 NORTHERN STATES POWE UTILITIES
143658 05/12/13 -"417.18 NCRTHERN STATES P06E UTILITIES
143658 05/12/13 7262. 3 RNO STATES 0P kE U ILI ESIUTILITIES
143658 05/12/83 182.42 NORTHERN STATES POkE UTILITIES
14365 - 05%12 - 3 +95.46 NCRTHERN STATES PO - - - --UTILITIES
143658 05/12/33 61.6a NORTHERN STATES POkE UTILITIES
143658 05/12/83 4 .31-NORTHERN STATES P06E UTILITIES
143694 _ - -- - 05/12/83 -- ___ 2,07500 _- -- PETER SON, BELL.... }_ CONV. - RETAINER PROS ATT
1983 CITY CF MAFLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER
CHECK A0.DATE_ _.- _AMIUNT - _ -VENDOg -_ITEM DES:RIPTION
143658 05/12/33 21 7.16 NORTHERN STATES POwE UTILI TIES
143658 05/12/R3 - -227.36 -N0RTFiERN STATES POWE --UTILITIES
3,255.62
143650 95/12/83 205940 fICRTHIkEST RN BELL TE TELEPHONE
143660 05/12/33 37.57 NORTHWESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE
143660 - --05/12/93 j2 - -- --NCRTHUEST RN BELL TE -TELEPHONE
143660 75/12/83 49.37 NCRTHGESTRN BELL TE TELEPHONE
143660 05/12/83 5947 NORTHIsESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE
143660 ti35l12/83 - -- _9,79 NCRTHinESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE
143650 05/12/83 42,97 NCRTHWESTERN BELL TE TELEPHGNE
143660 05/12/83 42.97 NORTH InESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE
143660 05/12/F3 - - - - - --42.97 11CRTHIiEST:.RN BELL TE -TELEPHONE
1 , 725.72 f
i-
143669 05/12/8 6.h-UTESCN LAVERNE TRAVEL TRAINING
6000, #
143683 05/12/x3 7.46 PARK MACHINE INC SUPPLIES VEH
143694 _ - -- - 05/12/83 -- ___ 2,07500 _- -- PETER SON, BELL.... }_ CONV. - RETAINER PROS ATT
n..:. _ .4.. h: a.. ..:i+'..5._._.. ".JY.= +_u:rr.1 .•r. .. yv...w Sn .}..... a
21L •. a ` . .
1983 CITY OF MAFL_W0 ^0 CHECK REGISTER
CHECK A .D AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
143702 05/11/83 _294.00 -_ --PITHEY_BOWES RENTAL CONTRACT
29 4.0 0
143738 05112/83 60.00 RAPSE'Y COUNTY CHIEFS TRAVEL TRAINING
fin 0.0 a
Ir
143756 -- --X5/12/83 - - -. --100 _______ - -_-RAMSEY COUNTY TREASU --SERVICES -TAxES
10.00 t
143762 05/12/83 99.40 FEEflS SAFES SERVIC SUPPLIES
143762 05/12/83 98.98 REEDS SALES SERVIC SUPPLIES
143768 S/12/3 - - -4Sa -- __RICE STRE =T CAR WASH VEH MAINT
143768 95 / 12/83 13.50 RICE STREET CAR WASH VEN MAINT
143738 05/12183 18000 RICE STREET CAR WASH VEH MAINT
143768 - --05/12183_ - - - --43I .- _- .-ftlCE - STREW CAR WASH - -__ Ei MAINT
4L
143768 05/12/83 4 RICE STREET CAR MASH VEH MAINT
143768 05/12/83 22.50 RICE STREET CAR MASH VEH MAINT
STREL"_T CAR 6A SH VEH MAINT
143758 05/12/13 9.00 RICE STREET CAR WASH VEM MAINT
143 768 05/12/83 5.50 RICE STREET CAR WASH VEH MAINT
143 768 _.. - --0 112 /83'--'---18.Op - -- - - - -RICE STREET CAR MASH -VEH MA INT
Vii;
m, ...v.,. ... e. -+r.. .. s - -._.+r ,..r : -. - - . >- ...._a,-, ..•..rrar.r sa - s.: : > a.ru- .w..wr .+nau- ....,..a I
1983 CITY OF MAPLE WOOD CHECK REGISTER
CHECK N DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
143768 05/12/83 1 3.50 RICE STREET CAR WASH VEk MA INT
143768 05/12/83 22.50 -RICE STREET CAR WASH VEH MAINT
143768 05/12/83 4.50 RICE STREET CAR WASH VEH MAINT
143 758 05/12/83 4.50 FILE STREET CAR DASH VEH MAINT
143763 05!12/03 -405 -0 -- -- --RICE STREET CAR WASH VEH MAINT
143761 05112183 4.50 RICE STREET CAR DASH VEH MAINT
172.00
ttft
143792 05/12/43 6925 RUGGED RMAL RUGS RUGS CLEANED
143792 05/12/33 -- - -- --40.65 - --BUDGED RE•4TAI RUGS -- -RUGS CLEANED
143792 15 112 /13 4t.b5 RUGGED RMAL RUGS RUGS CLEANED
143792 05/12/83 6.25 RUGGED RENTAL RUGS RUGS CLEANED
f
143794 05/12/'x.3 ---- --61.25 RYCO SUPPLY CO - _.___ - -- -- - - - --SUPPLIES
61.25 #
t ,e t t
743798 OS/12/R3 20.07 S + T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES
143798 05/12/R3 50.53 S T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES
143 798 05/12/13 72.36 _.__._--5_._ -T OFFICE PRODUCT -OFFICE SUPPLIES
143798 05 7g S T OFFI P OFFICE SUPPLIES
143798 05/12/43 12 S } T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES
143146 - - - - -- -05/12/83 70 . *54S{_T CFF- jCE_FRCDUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES
143 798 0 5/12/93 36.82 S + T OFFIC PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES
t.143 798 D 5.18-S + T CFF ICE PRODUCT OFFICE PPSU LIES
c
1
lk
f
1983 CITY OF MAFL_W000 CHECK REGIST.R
CHECK A09 OA TE AMOUNT VElYDCR ITEM DESCRIPTION
143798 05/12/83 200 S + T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES
143 798 05/12/33 15.36 T CFF ICE PR CDUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES
294.
143802 05/12/83 2*987.67 SCFOELL t MADSON INC PYM CONTRACT
21987.67
143810 95/12/83 43.96 SEARS ROEBUCK + CO SUPPLIES
CO -- -143810 - -05112/83 _ - --84.71 SEARS ROEBUCK SUPPLIES
i-
128.67
fttf
143841 05/12/33 649.75 ST PAUL CITY OF REPAIR MAINT VEH
143841 05/12/83 28000 ST PAUL CITY OF REPAIR MAINT VEH
677.75 #
143855 - - -- - - - -- 5/ 12/ 3Z_5 0_ .-- .__- __ - - -- STAPLES PAULINE GAS
r 25.00
r
A
143874 05/12/83 1.25.23 STO SP 9 ALIGN REPAIR MAINT VEH
125.23 +
143875 05/12/83 555.00 STREI CHER GUNS INC EQUIPMENT
n.- ..... ........ ., ... ... s. - - .... _ . r..... -. - .. .._, +r+.r..+. .• -
a r .. v.- . .v ...
n..w +.. .. .....• .......+a.., _n...-...., .+r+ ... w...r,.
tv• L/. ff+ Ln...Wa/- .rI:.+K`....fM1_.K• .!.:YVe "ln. ^ "JC•Y: i_. f.. _:}t.•' . _
s.........s.. ,a,
J
I 1 e W
1983 CITY OF MAFLEW010 CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO*OAT . E A N1 UNT VENOCR ITEM DESCRIPTION
143890 . *.05/12/93 3919 TARGET STORES INC CFFICE SUPPLIES
143890 05/12/83 20.50 TARGET STORES INC SUPPLIES FROG
143890 05/12/93 28944 TARGET STORES INC SUPPLIES PROG
52.13
fit # #f
143902 0 5/12 IR3 125.68 TDLZ KING DUVALL PYM CONTRACT
143902 05/12/83 3, 140.14 TCLZ KING DUVALL PYM CONTRACT
3.265.2
143922 35/12/83 -5'.53 TWIN CITY MARDhARE C SUPPLIES
143922 05/12/P3 61.73 TWIN CITY HARDWARE C SUFPLic.S
14392,2 05/12/83 11959 TWIN CITY HARDIsARE C SUPPLIES
129.85 t
143955 05/12/13 -20975---- _--- - - - - -_VW EI ASSOC INC —OFFICE SUPPLIES
143955 05/12/'93 20.75 VW E ASSOC INC CF'FTCE SUPPLIES
41 .50
143957 05/12/ 513 5.66 WARNERS TRUE VALUE HD SUPPL iES JAN
143957 5/12/R3 29 .. 3 ._- .----- ___-- _
1–
YAA - N£AS - TRUEVALUE - HO --SUPPLIES VEH
143957 05/12/83 2 WARNERS TRUEVALUE HD SUPPLIES VEH
i 37.98
r..'+.w.nq .. T faJ ^iMw.ef..'r..S.+.•..•we,+.r.. ...ems.. . - X41" 4' . .....P:- .Y....Cr„ V .. ar .. •. . _. -
J:
1983 . CITY OF MAIL= WOOD CHECK REGISTER
CHECK h0.DATE AROUNT VENDCR ITEM DESK R IP TZ UN
14 960 05/12/83 350.97 WEBER TROSETH INC REPAIR MAINT VE
143960 05/12/83 41.66 WEBER TROSETH INC REPAIR MAINT VEH
143960 05112 /R3 -12000 WEBER TROSETH INC REPAIR A I N TT VEH --
143960 fl5/12/R3 b.0 WEBER TROSETH INC REPAIR MAINT VEH
143960 05/12/83 9.50 WEBER TROSETH INC REPAIR MAINT VEH
42 o03
143968 D5/12/83_ --- - - -51 -WHITE BEAR DOCGE INC -EQUIPMENT
143968 05/12/83 17,022.40 WHITE BEAR DCDGE Ih,c EQUIPMENT
689089.60
143978 05/12/93 135.37 XEROX CORPQRATICN DUPLICATING COSTS
143978 05/12/83 - --135.36 XEROX CCRPORATr CN -_ -- -- -DUPLICATING COST!
270.73 #
tftt
43A51 05/11/R3 91000 HOUCK MILDRED REFUND
9000
rf #f4
143311 05/12/133 59734.22 PARSE CLINTON PROFESSIONAL SERI
143811 0 5/12/83 18.68 -- ---MORSE CLINTON --PR CFESSI OVAL SERI
5, 752.90
t,
ww -- -. .- . « .:... v _ .r .....w _ae..... •.r ....0 ,.r. sw..,ti ., v^a..s•aw. •u.w w, srr.sw..+.ar+s•..•a»w w••+w..+.vw e _.....,..•rw. ...r.. i...,....... .w.rrr.+a /
1983 CITY OF MAFLc-'WOOD CHECK REGISTER
C 113.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
143013 05/11/83 5.20 _ALSINS0-N _ -- - ._OFFICE SUPPLIES
5.20 •
143C17 05/11 /93 101000 FULLERS RADIO RAPAIR MAINT EQUI
101 00
143 -0 5 / 11 /R3 - - - --81.54 KREBS ENTERPRISES REPAIR MAINT YEH
181.54
143023 05/11/83 MAO PLAQUES PLUS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES
143023 35 /11f83 26.00 PLAGUES PLUS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES
143E01 5 11 /83 -- - - - - --10,DO - - - - --BECK EECK - L -- --REFUND - - - -- - --
10.00
143=02 05/11/93 1 BERGLUNC MARCIE REFUND
10000
143E03 05/11/83 91000 CALEGUIRE MARGARET REFUND
143E04 --05/ -22.90__ . - -. -.DOSTER SALES b SERV SUPPLIES VEH
22.9
143E05 05/11/83 188.55 HARMAN GLASS REPAIR MAINT VEH
1983 CITY JF MAFLE:61CO CHECK REGISTER
CHECK N09 DA TE AH3UN T _ — --- --- -VENDOR - _ – - -- - -ITEM DES: RIP TIONITEM
188.55
r
143x06 05/11 /83 8000 HASKINS MILLIE REFUND
143E'37 «05/11/83 10000 HEL`ANO ARTHUR REFUND
10.00 *
143'c08 05/11/83 23 - -_ __---HORS4ELL JUDIT A __. - --TRAVEL TRAINING
23.01
143_O9 305/11/93 18 *00 KIEWEL FRED REFUND
E_ -
l-
143E10 05/11/R3 1 _.__.___...KING CE4RGIANNA - - - --REFUND
10.00
143'12 05/11 /83
1437 05/11/83 V O 1 d "- "W. 1q.-W.L. 7 . LZy,.- ... ... _. _. _ _..._.....SUPPLIES
43E12
IttE- -..:
4.6-.4 $ -.-r
14313 05/11/83 18 .00 CARSON 8EV REFUND _.__.._
18.00
143E14 05/11/83 11.QO LYNCH AMY REFUND
143E 15 5 / 11 /83 104.50 MN CORRECTIONAL I NO -REPAIR MA I NT VEH
104950
143El 6 0 5 / 11 /83 24.50 No ST PAUL K IRBY _SUPPLIES
K
wn ...ev... acr+•....rs. ti..w.w «^r+rw. . sin -re>a: >
1993 CITY OF M A F L E W O O D CHECK REGISTER
CHICK AO.DATE AMOUNT VE'NOCR _ _—- -ITEM DES6.RIPTION
24.50
143E17 05/11/83 15.54 NORTHIROOD HOW SUPPLIES
15 .5 4
143 — -05/11/83 25 - .00 PARRANTC J b - - - - - -- - -- - - --REFUND
25.00
143 =19 05/11/83 93.90 P 8 PLASTIC ENTER OFFICE SUPPLIES
93.90
143x21 J;05/11/83 18.00 SCHOrHECKER EILEEN REFUND
18.00
143F22 «05/11/83 9.00 SMITH PATRICIA -- - _REFUND
9.00 t
143723 05/11 /8.3 13.00 SPECIALTY RACIC SERV REPAIR MAINT EDU
13.00
14 3 E 2 4 "05/11/A3 20000 STEE6 ER MICHAEL
20:00
143`GROGRAM SUPPLIES
143E25 05/11/93 107.31 U.S.GAlES PRCGRAM SUPPLIES
14 3 E 2 5 05/11/83 109.02 L o S.G A MES PR CGR AM SUPPLIES
14325 _ —_ --0- 5%11- /R3'_.. -____ _____96,.00.- -U.S.GAMES, ; -- - - - -- -PROGRAM SUPPLIES
143E25 05/11/83 169,42 U.S.GAMFS PROGRAM SUPPLIES
19155.22
143E26 05/11/83 35910 VIKING ELEC SUPPLY SUPPLIES
1983 CITY OF MAFLEW30D
CHECK REGISTER
CM+ECK ho. 0A TE AMOUNT VEhOCR ITEM DESCRIPTION
143027 ::05/11/83 50.00 wA AD R CY REFUND
143F28 05/11/83 YARZERA RICmARO SUPPLIES
143E78 75/17 /83 3.88 yARZEKA RICHARD SUPPLIES
a
7 *76
143-05/11/83 20.00 WRIGHT CR MAY SPEAKER
MAO
143 E 31 20.00 HELEY ROLAN UNIFORMS
20.00
143032 05/11/133 88.91 HAIV t'EG KEVIN R UNIFORMS
88.91 s
f 143'33 "05/12/83 268.50 SPANK PICTURESE IhC FILM RENTAL
183255 05/12/83-1 O +K SERVICE S - - - - - -_ -UNIF . ORMS..._ .
1R3255 05/12/83 _19010•G K SERVICES _ _UNIFORMS
183255 05/12/83 19010-GK SERVICS UNIFORMS
1 R 3 2 5 5 _. - ---_ _._5 / 12 / 133. _.19.10 ._ _-6 *K SERVICES- - - - --UNIFORMS
00
TEM9.- - FINANCF3D-B-Y---- REC'REA- TI0NAL FEES _._
2089865956 FUNC 01 TOTAL
1 w.r__a r.r .Mr. 'sII .- •W _+. O M- .. /- +M/AY -_vV .r/Aa
i
YU'rUwi' .SS r ;. iM4wM! 'ifi.q[l »Y ``e"MYleR9i w'iRS A. ricrlwtAfe tYY fill JT I//11
iii WMY•MV lip -_ #r +
1983 . CITY OF MAFLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
17 022.40 FUNC 02 TOTAL
717969 FUND 03 TOTAL
11.25 FUNC 36 TOTA
11.25 FUND 37 TOTAL
4000. _ - --- - -FUNC 39 TOTAL
60000 FUNC 41 TOTAL
19710000 FUNC 43 TOTAL.
22.50 FUND 45 TOTAL - -- -
29987.67 FUNC 47 TOTAL
412 FUNC 50 TOTAL
343.75 FUNC 51 TOTAL
90000 FUNC 58 TOTAL
125.68 FUNC 61 TCTAL
21097 --FUND 68 TOTAL
60000 FUNC 75 TOTAL
t
t -280.00 FUNC 76 TOTAL
FUNC 80 TOTAL - - --
3.140.14 FUNC 81 TOTAL
r 999284,77 FUND 90 TOTAL
29252.31 FUNC 96 TOTAL
3 3 7 7 , 49.5 . '6 6 TOTAL
C
r _a._._. _.........._..
CITY OF MAPLE 3AYROLL- CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8039 w . CHECK OATS OS Ob 83 PERIOD END 04.29 - PAG.r,1
f
DEPT -NO EMPL -N0 EMPLOYEE NAME CHECK - N0 AMOUNTNT CLEARS)
i '
0002
0002
484369671
206242318
BEHM
EVANS
LOTS N 0503 -00001 445.31 1
BARRY R 0503 -00002 1 •121.32
OD0z
1 •566.63 f
i 0010
0010
473664474
475143403
JAHN
PELOQUTN
DAVID J 0503 -OD003 117045
0010 _..469 SCHLE ICHER .
ALFRED
JOHN
J
F
0503 -03004
0503 -00005
63.21
0.00.
t
X,
0010
180.66
3011 475500285 MCPWERSON JOANNE F 0503 -00006 26000 t
0011
5
i 0012 357340166 CUOE LARRY J 0503.00 00 T 148.43 1 10012
3012
470520124 DOHERTY KATHLEEN M 0503- 00078 732.78 t471400908ZUERCHERJOHNL0503 -00 009 114.65 t
0021 469501378 FAUST DANIEL F 0503 - 00010 977.13 t 1 t
0021
0022 469200614 HAGEN ARLINE J 0503 - 00011 431.T0..0022 3 MATHEYS ALANA K 0503 -00012 488.73 t002476704432M4ELLERMARGARETA0503.00013 O.OD t X.0022 473327550 VIGOR EN DELORES ...A OSD • 014 379.33
0022
1 9299.76 #
0031 471322198 AUREI.IUS LUCILLE E 0503 -00015 818.26 t 10031474264816SVGL0BETTY0O503.00 016 482.03 t
1 f
003!1 9 300.2 9
0032...476Z69815 SC"AD T JEANNE L 0503 -00017 2 91.75._ --
0032
291.75
0033 477288389 'GREEN PHYLLIS C 0503 -00018 529.69 I
Al
0033
0033
472244994 HENSL EY PATRICIA A 0503.00019 187 A47662054?KELSEY CONNIE L 0503.00020 170.20 t 13033468364435VIETORLORRAINES0503- DQ 021 406.18
0033
1 9293.80
0034 037144969 FREDERICKSON RITA M 0503 -00022 O,pOD034474097528STOTTLEMYER.EDITH 6 0503• 00023 0000 c x.f,f;
3034
CITY OF MAPLE WOOOD 2AYR OLL-- CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8008 CHECK DATE 05.06 -83 PERIOD NDING 04.29 -83 PAGE 2
a
DEPT•NO EM EMPLOYEE VANE CHECK•NO AMOUNT CLEARED
7 0041 184440036 RASTYR DEBORAH A 0503 -000x4 303007
0041 468461717 COLLINS KENNETH V 0503- 00025 220.
y:0041 392240565 HAGEN THOMAS L 0503 - 00026 420.11 t
004.1 477227636 OMATH JOY E 0503 -00027 376.41 t f
0041 471502356 R I CHI E CAR OLE L 0503- 00028 324.41 t
14t a;0041 469602934 SVENDSEN JOANNE M 0503 -00029 465.15 t
0041 2009.94
D 042 477481364 ARNOLD DAVID L 0503- 00030 347.97 t
I'3042 471402115.ATCHI SON JOHN H 0503- 00031 666.56 t
14 0042 469689867 BOWMAN RICK A 0503 -00032 435.82 t 1
0042 468461930 CLAUS ON DALE K 0503 -00033 206,12
0042 476 4461 19 OR EGE R RICHARD C 0503--00 034 705.86 t
rr`.0042 470267887 GREEN NORMAN L 0503 - 00035 642.19 t f
s 0042 469568516 HALWEG KEVIN R 0503 -00036 532.85 t
0042 469820466 HEINZ STEPHEN J 0503 -00037 544.30 t
0042 473604916 HERBERT MICHAEL J 0503. 00038 532.3?t f
i 0042 4765 28607 JAOUI TH DANIEL R 0503 -0D 03 9 S 78.62 t
0042 392 760009 KARIS FLINT 0 0503 -00 040 4 40.t f
0042 472222231 KORTUS 004ALD V 0503 -00041 212.33 t
0042 471563591 LANG RICHARD J 0503 -00042 524.62 t i
0042 --468181347 MC NUL TY JOHN J 0503 -DD 043 192.93 t
M 0042 474607586 MEENA tisJR JAMES E 0503.40044 605.24 t
0042 471627417 METTLER DANIEL B 0503.00045 669.37 t _
i..;0042 4694 42063 MOSS: HTER RICHARD M 0503 -00046 1 39.43 t
0042 476340990 MOREL LI RAYMOND J 0503 - 00047 662.82 c f
0042 475 323183 NELSON ROBERT 0 0503 - 00048 759.95 t .
D042 468462884 PE'LTIER WILLIAM F 0503 -DD049 600.34
0042 470520457 SKALMAN DONALD W 0503 -00050 155.33 t
0042 473548226.,STAFNE GREGORY L 0503 -00051 _604 *65 ...__..
471721204 STEFFEN SCOTT L 0503 - 00052 196.41 t
0042 471500251 STILL VCERNON T 0503 -00053 549.93 t
0042 471629204 STOCK TON OAR RE'LL T 0503 -OU 054
0042 - -474260130 ZAPPA JOSEPH A 0503 -00055 631979 t 1
i ! '
et
0042 _ ...1 t X811 • d5
i
0043 475548434 BECKER RONALD 0 0503 -00056 216.14 t 1
0043 469441789 GRAF DAVID M 0503 -00057 526.14 t f _
0043 476401388 LEE ROGER W 0503 -00058 618999 t f
0043 4 735 67791 MELANDER JON A 0503 -00059 2.8.74 t
0043 4683.60918 NELSON CAROL M 0503 -00060 795.67 t 1
0043 471504316 RAZSKAZOFF GALE E 0503 -00061 595.60 t
0043 4 715 64101 RYAM MICHAEL P 0503 -00062 465.41 t
0043 474486U71 VORWERK ROBERT E 0503 - 00063 231.73 t f
0043 469502201 YOUNGREN JAME G 0503 - 00064 638.48 f
13043 4,v 116*90
a+0045 47140IR78 EMBER TSON JAMES M 0503.00065 660.04 t
w
CITY OF MA PLE Y0000
AYR OLL•CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8003 CHECK DATE 05 - 06.83 PERIOD E NDINGDEPTNpEM -NO EMPLOYEE NAME
04 -29 -83 p AGE 3
0045
CHECK•N0 AMOUNT CLEARS)472242227 SCHADT AL"RED C 0503.00066 712.1b
004s
1 9 3 72.2 O t
r
004,
0046
468401399
4776272 36
CANANES
FLAYANT0HtiY G 0503.00067 146.59
0046 475587232 FULLER
JAYEE
JAMES
L IfS03.000 68 491.68 t0046
0046
473807030
4723. 65919
MAR - TIN SHAWN
0 0503.00069
M 0503.00 070
467.49
392 3
t ! .
A
0046 468600'1 83
NELSON
R46INE
KAREN
JANET
A 0503•oOOT 1 42762
t 1
0046 475363333 WILLIAMS DUA NE
aL S03 oo0 392.32 t 1J0503 - 00073 470.54 t 10046
29788,56
i !0053
0051
4T14602b7
4735668
BARTA
N A IDS R
MAR IE L 0503 -00074 2 61, 3 3
A
0051 504483174 YEGWERTH
KEKENNETH
JUDITH
G 0503-00075 171.25 t 1A0503 -00076 357934 t 10051
789.92
0052
052
4 96308314
47 1526254
CASS
FREBE RG
WILLIAM C 0503 -00077 5949 21
D052 502544337 HELEY
RONALD
RONALD
L 0503.00078 333.55
0052
0052
4716p1083
471501241
HOCHBAN JOSEPH
J 0503 -00074
H 0503 -00080
S47,22
565, 26
0
0052 468363473
KANE
KLAus ING
MICHAEL
HENRY
R 0503 -o0081 394.91 t0052471500547pEYERGERALD
F 0503 -0D082 481, 12 6..t0052
0052
468166755
472241484..
PRETT AER JCSEPH
W 0503-
8 0503.00084
4 41, 3 6
750.94
t - '
0052 470346224
REINERT .. ..
TEVLIN
EDWARD A 0503.0008 S 547965
t I
HARRY J 0503.OD086
005
49828.2
0053
D053
472481010
1672461 09
EL IAS
GEISS LER
JAMES G OS 03.00087 571e6?t 1005350/ 4 b4671 GES SE LE
yALTE R
JAMES
M 0503-OD 088 S 7,1 / .1 fs
0053 aj 475441688 PECK DENNIS
T 0503.0Uo89 663.04
0053 _.476622458 PILLA T?KE DAVID
L 0503 "00090.489.77 t 10053472662522pRiEBEWiLLiaM
J 05 03 - 00 09 1
0503 -DO 092
T 78.75 _..
4 79.0/
0053
305b,35 f
0054 4756014 31 LuTt DAVID p 0503 -00093 389
0054
1 1
389,91 :
I '
0058
0058
4715 62563
477602592
8R EHE I M
EDSON
ROGER W 0503 -0009 4 498.94 t 1:D058 470541590 MULW E
DAVID
GEORGE
8 0503- 00095 578,07 tD058471501014NADEAUEDWARD
M 0503- t1D096 465 72 t 10058
0058
468361720
471365993
AUTES CN
pWEN
L
A 0503.0tDa9T
S 0503.00098
ig 8.20
396.01 Al
GERALD C OSD3 -OD 099 508.92
t 1
00 58
2035,06
CITY .oF MAPLE W0000
i
r
n
J ?
J'
y
1
J tiJ
J i
i
i
i
t
l
t,
i
2AYROLL- CHECKS REGISTER
DEPT -NO EMPL -NO EMPLOYEE NAME
0059 476249760 MACDONALD
0059 475501000 MULVA NEY
0059-
A 0503 -00108
0061 477301 D 66 BR ENN ER
0061 469341993 KRUM4EL
0061 473260389 ODEGA RD
0061 468582618 STAPLES
00)61
0 0503 -00113
0062 4737090124 BAUER
0062 471447219 BURKE
0062 474608182 GERMA IN
0062 472303411 GUSINDA
0062 474924209 HAAG
0062 5.02544121 HELEY
0062 _.473969784 HUNTER
0062 471748313 LIBRA PDT
0062 473565506 MARUS KA
0062 474073128 RASCHKE
0062 477646662 SANDQUIST
0062 416203439 SA ATA.
0062 4748 45176 SPANN BA UER
0062 473660035 STARK
0062
c
3063 471801203 ASHTON
0063 270483797 BLACK
11063 471901502 BOYD
0063 474442474 BUNKE
0063 4?6924605 CASSEOAY
0063 473684976 CASSECAY
3063 468684957 CERNI US
0063 4 T2 8 44611 DALLU GE
0063 47088029.3 DELMONT
0063 474829219 DIEBE L
0.063 471884448 GALBR AITH
13063 476686996 HERBER
0063 474743915 KORTUS
0063 468984515 KRUMREL
0063 477929499 KRUMMEL
D063 469929687 KYRK
0063 474889823 LANCE LETT
0063 469953553 LARKIN
0063 473700729 MAHRE
0063 473869923 MCCUL LOM
3063 474966150 MIHEL ICH
0063 473903822 NIELSEN
CYCLE 6008 CHECK DATE 05 -06 -83 PE _ NDING 04 -29 -83 PA, C: 4
CHECK- No AMOUNT CLEARED
JOHN E 0503 -00100 460.39 _
OE NI S M 0503 -00101 6150 31 t
LOI S J 0503 -00102
BARBARA A 0503 - 00103
ROBERT 0 0503 -00104
PAULINE 0503.00105
ALAN N 0503 -00106
MYLES R 0503 -00107
DAVID A 0503 -00108
MELVIN J 0503 -00109
MATTHEW J 0503 -00110
ROLAND B 0503 -00111
T04Y
G
0503 -00112
THOMAS 0 0503 -00113
MARK A 0503 -00114
ALBERT F 0503 - 00115
THOMAS J 0503 - 0.0116
REED E 0503w00117
MARTIN J 0503- 03118
RICHARD E 0503 - 00119
KATERI D 0503 -00120
WILLIAM J 05030012.1
JEFFREY A 0503 -00122
RICHARD H 0503 -00123
ELIZABETH J 0503 -00124
MARY K 0503 -00125
DAVID G 0503 -00126
MATTHEW'D 0503 -00121
LISA M 0503 -00128
JERRY 0 0503 - 00129
MICHAEL D 0503 -03130
KAR IN J 0503 -00131
JAMES M 0503 -00132
BECKY J 0503 -03 133
ROGER C 0503 -00134
JODI A 0503 -00135
STEVEN E 0503 -00136
MOLLY A 0.503 -03137
MICHELE A 0503 -00138
JULIE A 0503 -00139
CINDI L 0503 -OD 140
RONALD C 0503 -00141
19075 *
205069 t
131 ......K f
8 78 0 74 t
69 3. 78 t
1 X916019 +
0.00 x = f
73 39 t 1
5 44, 31 1
765o25 t
120.00
559 t
118
0.00
663o27 t
26 t
0000 t x: I
0000 c xi 1
0. 00 .1 xt 1
0000 t K f
29870 #
0.00 t K 1
63.65._. __....:t
0000 c
0.00 c x f
0.00... -.c x f
0000 c x 1
0000 x )
40 00 _.._..___..t K ! _
0000 t x /
0000 c x f
0000 c x f
000 t K f
0000 t x 1
0000 t W )
0000 x ,
0000 t x I
0000 x )
goon c 9,
0000 t x
0000 t x
0.00 cKf
0000 c x f
CITY OF MAPLE WOOOD AYR OLL- CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE BOOS CHEEK DATE 05 -06 =81 PERIOD _NDING 04m29-83
DEPT -NO EM NO EMPLOYEE MANE cH K-EC NO AMOUNT
PAGE 5
CLEARED
0063
0063
476863802
477629606
PAULETTI
RASCHKE
ANTHONY A 0503 " 00142 0000 t X )
0063 472986940 RICHI E
JEFFERY
STA CY
J
L
0503 - 40143
0503-00144
39 *43 t 1
0063
0.0.63
469927221
46894+6400
ROTH VINCE C 0503- 00145
0.00
0000
t
t
X )
X )
0063 473686517
RYDEN
SANDOUIST
DENISE
KATHRYN
0503 -00 146
OS 03 -00140
0000 X.
0063
0063
477869067
469742645
SPANNBAUER DAWN M 0503 -00146
0,00
O.Oa
t
t
X
K' )
0063 477920170
SPANNBAUER
STRAUS
KATHLEEN G 1503 -00 749 O.OtI t X I
0063 472821395 SULLIVAN
LAURA
NANCY
J
J
0503-00150
0503.00151
0000
42.00
X I
i
0063
0063
471528238
477.626422
TATS
TA MUB AN
PETER M 0503 -00152 a. 00 t K•
t !
0063 475904189 TOWNLEY
DOUGLAS
MICHAEL
J
F
05.03 - 00153
0503 -00154
533 t
D063
3063
4751'83041
470963203
VIETOR
WALLACE
WENDY L 0503. 00155
0.00
0000
t
t
1X )
XV
0063 475 747042 WARD
JON
K ER I
T 050.3 -00156 0.0o t K )
0063 396324246 YARD ROY
L
G
0503 -0015 T
0503 - 00158
0000
257.50
t X . )
t
0063
936.51
0064
0064
151440508
471384624
GREW
HORSNELL
JANET M 0503 -00159 464
DOb4 474542163 SOUTT ER
JUDITH
CHRISTINE
A 0503 -00160
0503- 00161
520 ' 47
486,04
t
0064
t g 471.15 t
0071
DOl1
389448993
47 0540551
CHLEBECK
OLSOM
JUDY M 0503 -00162 318 .72
t G EOFF REY W 0503 -00163 739.67 t
0071
1 9058939 •
2...
3.072
iT7627178
475608505
EKSTRJtNO
JOHNSON
TN AON S G 0503.00164 484 88..
RANDALL L 0503 - OD 165 5 30.45
D072
1 901 S.33
0073 476090677 OSTROM MARJOR IE 0S03* 00166 731.06
1141 0073
73146
007;387520776 WENGER ROBERT J 0503 -00167 5107e46 t
0074
507,46
i COUNT 00167 GRAND TOTAL
S4 7i 18.5 4
41t
4 yMEMORANDUM
TO: City • y
FROM. Thomas Ekstrand - -Asso ic ate Planner
Action bar Cou c •1 '
SUBJECT: • .Home Occupation RenewalLOCATION:En.orscd
2125 White Bear AvenueAPPLICANT /OWNER : -Shirley Trebesch
0 1 -Le
F
PROJECT: Vi ] 1 a e BegB Shop Re j ectod ..._
DATE: May 4. 1983 Date
SUMMARY
Request
Renewal of a perm for a beautyutyshop home occupation.
Comments
r .
s
All conditions are being meg t. There have been no complaintsfromneighbors. A 1 i cense for 1983 receive d
must also be obtained.
Recommendation
Approval to renew the home occu 'patron for a beauty shop at 2125 White BearAvenue, subject to the fol iowin condit9
1. The permit shal be reviewed -d by the city council i n fi ve y ears.
2. The applicant shall keep he e •p existing fire extinguisher in the salonarea,
3. On- street parking by customers shall 'be discouraged.
4. No expansion of the permit i n a •p any way shall occur withoutofthecitytycounci1,the approvalpp
50 operation be limited to two chairs.
6. The applicant shall _obtain an annual h •home occupation license from thecityclerk,
BACKGROUND
Past Actions
5- 17 -73: Council approved the •home occupation subject to nine conditions.dtons,
7 - -78: ,Council aPP a renewal of this home occup sub 'following conditions: P sect to the
I. The permit shall be reviewed ev2 . The ery five years by the city counc •permit shall be subject to revocation by eth 'justified complaints city council upon
3. The sign gn s ha 11 be removed from thehe front yard and mounted on the homeetthesigncode; use
40 A fire extinguisher shall be ins 'installeded i n the salon area;5. Conditions number 3, 4 6 7 and 8 shat '
approval
1 remain i n force from the originalPpofMay17, 1973;
Original conditions:
30 The permit shall not be transferable;4.he permit shall be subject to revocation
on justifie ton by the V 11 age Counci 1uPcomplaints;6. No on- street parking b customersy shall be encouraged, and an im-proved off-street parking area which i
ed shall properly hard surfaced andlandscapedpall.be.required on the property;7 . Operationion be limitedmited to two chairs;8. No expansi of the permit in an •Y way shall occur without the approvaloftheVillallageCounci1.
6. Owner and applicant agree to the a • •9 bone conditions n writing,
Code Re ui rements
1 • All requirements of the city •y code relating to home occupations are beingmet. eng
2. Section 36- 442(e) provides that u .
uest the co
Ron
indefinite term or specific term nottoexceedfiveyearsforsubsequentreviews.
3. The city's licensing coder •rres that a lcense be secured from thcityclerkannually n the month of JanuaryY to continue operation of ahomeoccupatio
A license renewal was not applied for -PP r n January. The applicant wasunawareofthisrequirement.
jw
Enclosures:
1.. Location Map
2. Property Line Map
2
COUNTY o C Bel
mi
49 40
Nk, LBR 0 OKAL_ E -2 0
4
ul It fit AVE.
CD
0
GERVAIS
TAI
j F0 [S * E X TA_ NT 4
LD RFM _ j A%
COPE AVE.
AVE. wjLARKLARKAVE.25
COUNTY uRiE RD.LA
4a x
25 cr
t-9) Ei i;A 2 z w w
z c 65JUNCTIONI[AVE.-E:::A
M AVE. >.I
GO 4C
ELDRIDG E _j AVE.
cr 64
SOOar
0 IZf AN ROS WOOD — ))AVE.
t OR FRISBIIE AVE.
IL Iz
AVE-
62 U3
in nF] I
cc cn
Loh e -2 29 u) KINGSTON
PRI
WE
F;;!F F—I F-1TIF-11 F F I
MAR
t; c
7.
1 t• r _j__j I I0 , - !
k 2j. 11 1J
J . r
18 tYN 11 _
R EG, 415.s
0
c AN
0i U R.
11C V_ Fso. ,p f• `
r
o
C, •
do
j5NOR, 16
4f pip
C
tv
2p 3 ' { T4 .-4 c
PROPERT MAP IF
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Associate Planner--JohnsonSUBJECT: final Plat
LOCATION: County Road C and Keller ParkwayAPPLICANT /OWNER: Rod olfo Gonzalez
PROJECT: Gonzalez Addition
DATE: May 13, 1983
Request
Final plat approval to create five sin 1 e -dwel 1 i n9 g lots,
Comments
All conditions of preliminary plattingi - •p t ng have been satisfied.
Recommendation
Action by Council:
Endorsed
Approval of the Gonzalez Addition final 1 at, subject topJ the cornerslotbeingmonumentedbylandsurveyprior
of each or to issuance of anybuildingpermits.
j
BACKGROUND
Past Actions
8 -6 -81: Council approved the Gonzalez Addition preliminary - nar plat 'p y_ p subjectb ecttothefollowingconditions:
1. Payment of deferred assessments of $1,312.50 for sanitary sewer andnd
630.15 for street improvement on County Road C;
2. An erosion control and grading plan shall be prepared with the advicec
1 Conservation Service and submitted for staff approval
p e
of the Soil
prior to final plat approval.
9- 27 -82: Council approved a one year time extension for the Gonzalez
Addition preliminary plat.
Public Works
The grading plan is acceptable with the exception of the proposed fillingwithinthedesignateddrainageeasementinthesoutheastcornerofthe
site. The . grade ng permit wi.l l address this concern.
jW
Enclosures:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line Map
3. Final Plat
2
58
s
O
22
Gervois
Loke
o -
VVr
V
W
J
J
22
OURKE AV.
E AV.
ID ELMONT
4
sKILLMAN
kLbwW
F- _W =
W 4 .5 r "i,
s VADNARS HEIGHTS
o
Q
o W
l
r
h
ROAD
S
J W ,t
Z iW
Q
t
Q
AV E.
I [ f
M36
v I sev
LARK AVE.25COUN Y O -
O,7 rx I LEL AN t
O
2
o JUM T10N AVE. _j
U RKE
NT ` ELD/
W > L ,
r -
t`r -
N R ar
A .
Attachment one LOCATION MAP
Attachment two PROPERTY LINE MAP
N
Attachment three GONZALE Z ADDtT10N
FINAL PLAT
TRACT. D TRACT C
I
J i`
aREGISTEREDLAM) SUR`vEY 1 -, ry A4
4 Roar,C "
COUNTY ROAD C
eel `Z 3
t1 1p
w
W O
ox
tt• w
1
i f • /
r awe.w •
wA.rw...u.
M
Mt wrw.. w •... w....
Attachment three GONZALE Z ADDtT10N
FINAL PLAT
METRIOPOLITAn
wRire
conrROL
commvnon
Twin Gies Area
I
350 METRO /(?DARE BLDG.
7TH & ROBERT fTREET/
fAInT PAUL mn 55101
112 222.8423
4
recycled
April 12, 1983
Mr. Barry Evans , City Manager
City of Maplewood
1380 Frost Avenue
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Mr. Evans:
Action by C unc-1" _
E d ,. -I .,
r
b
Enclosed is Joint Use Rental Agreement No. 150 which is
being renewed for a five -year period from January 1,
1983, through December 31, 1987. The annual payment
has been increased to $4022.00,, with payments made on
an annual basis rather than on a monthly basis. The
payment for 1983 will be made shortly after execution
of this Agreement* Subsequent payments will be made on
January 31st, of each year thereafter
Please execute all three ( 3) copies of the enclosed
Agreement and return to this office, Your prompt
attention to this matter will be greatly appreciated.
Sincerel ,
Anthony . Gnerre
Deputy Chief Administrator
cc: R. L. Berg, Comptroller, MWCC
R. W. Arbour, Interceptor System Manager, MWCC
Enclosures
ACG: CLL
1
r
STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT RENEWAL
JOINT USE RENTAL AGREEMENT ' EMENT NO . 150
The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission •and the City of
Maplewood agree to renew the Joint Use Rental Agreement-No.150 . under
t he terms and conditions contained in the agreement which is
currently in force between these 'parties . The renewal period shall
be for five ( 5) years commencing on Januarynuary 1, 1983 through December
31, 1987.
The Commission hereby agrees to •Y g pay the municipality the total
sum of $4,022.00 for the use, operation andd maintenance of the
interceptor severs described in Exhibit "A" of 'the original agreement
on or before January 31 of each ca 1 endar ear 'y during the agreement
renewal period.
On or before November 1, 1987, the Commis 'Commission may give the
municipality written notice of its intentionon to renew this Agreement,
Within thirty ( 30) days after receiptcei.pt of such notice the municipalityshallnotifytheCommissioninwritinghether 'g it will renew the
Agreement. If the municipality fails to ive such •g notice within such
period, the Agreement shall be renewedd for the following calendar
year without modification, except b consent of both 'Y th parties . If the
Commission fails to give the municipality notice •P Y e of its intention to
renew by November 1, 1987, the Agreement shall1 be renewed only by
consent of both parties,
That both parties agree to the renewal. er io •p d and terms i s
evidenced by the signatures affixed to the renewal Agreement.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION
George H. Frisch, Chairman
George W. Lusher, Chief Administrator
Date Date
STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT RENEWAL
JOINT USE RENTAL AGREEMENT NO* 150
The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission and the City of
Maplewood agree to renew the Joint Use Rental Agreement No.g .150 under
the terms and conditions contained in the a reem -en 'g t which is
currently in force between these parties, The renewal period . A p iod shall
be for five (5) years commencing n January 1 1983 throughgy , Dec ember
31, 1987.
The Commission hereby agrees to a the municipalitytopaypy the total .
sum of $4,022 for the use, operation and maintenance of the
interceptor sewers described in Exhibit "A" of the original agreement
on or before January 31 of each calendar year during gtheagreement
renewal. period.
On or before November 1, 1987, the Commission may give the
municipality written notice of its intention to renew this Agreement.g •
Within thirty (30) days after receipt of such notice the municipalitypY
shall notify the Commission in writing whether it will renew the
Agreement. If the municipality fails to give such notice within such
period, the Agreement shall be renewed for the followin g calendar
year without modification, except b consent of both . arties .Y p If the
Commission fails to give the municipality notice of its intention to
renew by November 1, 1987, the Agreement shall be renewed onlyY Y
consent of both parties.
That both parties agree to the renewal period and terms is
evidenced by the signatures affixed to the renewal Agreement,g •
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION
George H. Frisch Chairman
George W. Lusher, Chief Administrator
t
Date Date
STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT RENEWAL
JOINT USE RENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 150
The Metropolitan waste Control Commission and the City of
Maplewood agree to renew the Joint Use Rental Agreement No. 150 under
the terms and conditions contained in the agreentent which is
currently in force between these parties. The renewal p eriod shall
b e for five ( 5) years commencing on January 1, 1983 through December
31, 1987.
The Commission hereby agrees to pay the municipality the total
sum of $4,022.00 for the use, operation and 'maintenance of the
interceptor sewers described in Exhibit "A" of the original agreement
on or before January 31 of each calendar year during the agreement
renewal period.
On or before November 1, 1987, the Commission may give the
municipality written notice of its intention to renew this Agreement,
Within thirty ( 30) days after receipt of such notice the municipality
shall notify the Commission in writing whether it will renew the
Agreement. If the municipality fails to give such notice within such
period, the Agreement shall be renewed for the following calendar
year without modification, except by consent of both parties. If the
Commission fails to give the municipality notice of its intention to
renew by November 1, 1987, the Agreement shall be renewed only by
consent of both parties.
That both parties agree to- the renewal period and terms is
evidenced by the signatures affixed to the renewal Agreement,
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION
Date
George H. Frisch, Chairman
George W. Lusher, Chief Administrator
t
Date
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
PROJECT:
DATE:
City Manager .
Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner
Conditional Use Permit Renewal
Beam Avenue and Hazelwood Street Se e Location tap)Health Resource'Center, Inc. /St. John' n s HospitalHealthResourceCenter, Inc. /William B. KorstadHospital
May 6, 1983
Action b
e en
I) at _._.....
Request
Renewal of a conditional use ermi -P t to construct a 29.0 -bed hospital relacaloffices, an emergency ambulatory-care tedmedical
Rifer face l ty and medicalhousing. 9 r to the enclosed Site Plan,
Past Actions
5-20-82: Council approved a cond i t i on •al use permit for the proposed hospitalandrelatedmedicalfacilitiesbasedonthefollowing11owengf ndi ngs
1. The proposed hospital use complies •P s w th the DC designation of the LandUsePlan,n.
2. The hospital is an appropriateate us ' •p e n a BC district,ct.
3. The proposed hospital is a needed facilityadjacentaclty to serve Maplewood and thentnortheasterlysuburbs.
W
Ordinance Requirement
Section 36- 442(Il.e.) states that all •the Co conditional use permits shall be reviewedbyCouncilwithinoneyearofthedateofapproval. •specify • Pp oval • At that review theCouncilmaypyanindefinittotermorspecificctermnott •years for subsequent reviews, o exceed f ve
Recommendation
Renewal of the conditional use '
medical perms t fora 290 -bed hospital and relatecalfacelities, subject to review b Co 'y Council n five years.
iW
Enclosures:
1. Location Map
2. Site Plan
VADNAIS HEIGHTS
is
AVE.
I PA I
tr
o
JOk-004.9ft
U011
t X:WA
I
AVEA.
H to AVE. 11
sll "Zil
LOCATION MAP"
ff+• N
j
Ytda. hrlr.ir. WOW rf
Future Housing i Ratatsd Parking has" CWv•
of 3 1 &P&apt
as N . M.d«r w
Irwr oM".•oo0 prof dksp apu„ier1 X0 000 b% Ph• sa 11
M a C toar,ieoJ MUD N •
A dial
40 to t boas app f
W5.5W of
wral is I-tas
i s
1
i
ar .,s wr hi.t• Raid
Y air [ w M' ft 00"
b V ,
nay t
PFDPO&od Hospital - •
U $w%Q
Health Resource ConIsX
g s•a'0'°r1 rif 1b++i•istrel.• srrie •
Maplewopd &NILIMRC Erwa+,os
Profe s a3cxl
BuVdft.
rho so ! b N iN} •
Sw
s+t ua t!- •torte
1'n+rw / •oI
Brant Avwxo .
SITE PLAN 4
N
MEMORANDUM A
Action. by Counci
T0: City Manager En.crs1.,....
FROM: Associate Planner.-Johnson
SUBJECT: Plan Amendment ARM and LSC to BW ) Reiec ---
LOCATION: East of White Bear Avenue, South of Count Road B- Date
Communty Development - =-APPLICANT: Director of
y
OWNER: Lillian Wi ckl ander, Richard Pearson and C no strucelon Center, Inc.DATE: April 15, 1983 _
1
1 r
Bequest
Amend the Land Use Plan from RM, residential medium -dens i ty and LSC, limitedtedservicecommercialtoBW, business warehouse for the east sidee of Whiteto BearAvenue, as shown on attachment three.
Reason for Request
10 This proposal is in response to Council's cittywide downzoning program.The present zoning--BC, business commercial and M -1 lightht man ' --permits uses
9 ufacturi ngpthataremoreintensivethananticipatedpatedbtheLandUsePlany
20 No devel opment proposals are endi n for the 'p g e site.
Comments
Rather than downzone this property, the Land Use Plan s hould be amended tocorrecttheinconsistencybetweenthePlanandresentzoning.M-1, 1i p n9• The presentlightmanufacturingzoningiscompatiblewiththesitetoandadjacent ' nt uses.The BC, business commercial zoning on the northern orti on of '
r
P the si i sbeingrforrezoningtoM -1 i n a separate report.
J
This site possesses two public works related limitations--sanitary sewer andaccess (see Background Information -- Public Works . M- 1 -zoni n . ) g s the bestzonalternativetorecognizetheselimitations,
Recommendati
I• Approve the enclosed resolution (attachment one ) revising the Land Use PlanfromRMandLSCtoBWforanarealyingeastofWhiteBearAvenueandsouth ofCountyRoadB.
II. Amend the acreage chart on page 19 -3 of the Land Use Pla to reflect thechangefromRMtoBW,'
M
BACKGROUND
Si to Descri ti on
Acreage: 11.3
Existing Land Use',- Construction-related warehousing -ed n9 and offs cis andundevelopedPproperty. _
Surrounding Land Uses
Wirth: Single dwellings, planned for service commercial1 use and Kinney Shoes
East: City property contai •a storm drainage pond and lannedP for a parkSouth: Undeveloped Ramsey Countyunty property, separated from the mainma n body ofcountypropertybyanabandonedrailroadDepartmentofNatural ]road right -of -way. TheResourcesisseekiauthoriright -of - for ti °n to purchase the rai 1 roadytrail1.
West: White Bear Avenue. Across the road, ar _1 ar a tractedas
g of property plannedandpartialdevelopedPBW, business warehouse use.
Past Action
11 - - 61: Council r . al to BCjectsitetha
ezoned from R - 1, residenti - portion of the sub business commercial the
medium d (attachment
t i s presently planned for RM r •density two }. The esdential
or minutes. proposed use i s not specified in the 'file
Planning
I. Land Use Plan des Rm, residential medi um dens' •service commercial, ity and LSC, limited
A. The LSC classification refers to commercial facilities on a neighborhoodscaHeavyindustrialusesd - ghborhood
ted, while other
department stores, motels, auto accesswouldbeprohiaccessorystores, etc. w
land uses of a mediumintensitynaturewoulddbe - permi tted tsubjec to me -standards. meeting certain performance
B. The RM classification is dfami1h
maximum populati
i
on
gnated for such housing types as singleyhousesonsmalllots, two -famil y homeshomes. The ma densit i ` s 22 ,
townhouses, and mobile
y . eo lePp per net acre.
2. Proposed Land Use Plan designation: BW, business warehouse. T -cation includes governmental and hi cl assi fi -
e a public utility buildings and structures,9 and warehousing facilities, sties wholesale ctures,storage
menus ,cartage a
s esal a business and office establig .
al uses
and express face 1 ti es, radio an •
sh
other industri d television stations andofalower-intensity nature.
3. Zoning: BC, business commercialercial and M -1, light manufacturinattfiveandsixforpermitteduses.) M _ ' (
Refer to
2
Pu bl i c Works
c
1. Development of this site will requireire a sewage liftft s a 'q g station facility.Publicly owned l i f t stations should be avoided, as recommended by the
sewer plan. Large structures , typical of M -1 uses, wou keep he
otent for subdivi T p
P of the to a The fewer separateproperty .owners, the better the chances of a privat agreement for
construction and maintenance .of a private l i f t station.
2, Development such as warehousing, rather than other forms of `commerciala1
or residential development, is also preferred to reduce the number of
potential turning movements into and from this site via uncontrolledled _
driveway intersections. Such turning movements are undesirable because
they disrupt traffic flow.
Procedure
1. Planning Commission recommendation followingowin a publicc h 'g p hearing
2 - Metropolitan Council review for impact on metropop systems.
3. City Council decision
JW _
Enclosures
1. Resolution
2. Existing Land Use Plan
3. Proposed Land Use
4. Property Line Map
5. BC Zone
6, M -1 Zone
3
Attachment-1
r
Pursuant to due ca •11 and notice thereof, a •
of .regular meeting of the CityCityMaplewood , Minnesota was
Council of the Ci t
s duly call and held itheCouncilChambersinsaidCityonthedayof7:00 p.m. y 1983 at
The following members were -present.
The following membersbers were absent: _ •
WHEREAS, a roceeP dings for the amendment of the Maplewood ComprehensanforMaplewood" has been ini
Munic pa] P1 an entitled "P1
a t ated by the CitygofplannedusefromLSClimited
of Maplewood for a Chan
and RM, residential medium de 9 m tea service commercial
e
ns ty to BW, businessHess warehous igeneralllydescribedarea:ng for thefollowing
The south 183 feet of the west 633 feet of the northwestthwest 1/4 ofthenorthwest1/4 (subject to roads and easements) in sectionrange22andexceptthe 14,township-29
183 feet; the west feet-of
e north 33 feet and the southt433feetofthenorthwest
i 1/4 of the northwest1/4 (subject to road) n section 14, townshiphip 29, range 22
WHEREAS, the procedural history of the proposed amendment iss as follows
1. The City of Maplewoodewood has a Comprehensive MunicipalP •
Plan for Maplewood' adopted P entitled
Stat P ed Pursuant to the Provisions 'utes, Chapter 670, Laws 1965 of MinnesotatheMunicipalPlanningAtoStatutesAnnotated, Secti 9 ctMinnesotSections462.351 to 462.364 thereof •
2. Minnesota Statutes Se ction 462.355, Subdivision 2 andrpovadeforamendmentofthe 3 thereof,Comprehensivve Mun c a] P1 an othereof; P r of ansection y
3. An amendment of the Comprehensiveprehensive Plan has beC ty of Maplewood and referred
been • Proposed bythe
ed to the Maplewood Planning Commission,a public hearing on the 18th day mmssion,which held
Statutes, y of April, 1983 pursuant toMinnesota355, Subdivision 2 thereof, •and publ cats on havi n been ' , note ce by may 1ggiven, ven , heard all who wishedcons toallwrittenandstaffr
be heard,reports and analysis.
WHEREAS, the MaplewoPod City Planning Commission •testimony of those present a
have ng cons i dered the
recommended
all Witten submi ss isubmissions to immendedapprovaloftheamendm
t and staff, reports,amendment,
NOW., THEREFORE, BE ITdesc RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITYabedplanamendmentbeapproved
Y COUNCIL that the above-
fact: PP oved on the basis of the fo11 on9 findingsf of
C
1. The proposed classifica tion would not havComprehensive e an adverprehensivePlan, y e effects on the
2. It would
and near
3. It would
associat+
Adopted this
Seconded by
be consistent with the existing development and zoning nthesite,g
be-consistent-with the potential sewer' and -racce 'ss limitationsdwiththesite..
day of 1983.
Ayes --
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS.
CITY OF MAPL EWOOD) _
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed C1 erk of
the City of Maplewood Minnesota, do hereby Certify that I have carefullcomparedtheattachedand 'oregoing extract of minutes of a regularar meeti n9 9oftheCityofMaplewood, held on the day of 1983 with
the original on file in my office, and the same is a full true and com pletetranscripttherefrominsofarasthesamerelatesto
Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City th,s
day of 1983.
City Clerk
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
3
O
7
An
o
as --IL
T ang t'm a
3
e,
1
A
C
a
Attachment 2 - - -
Sherwood Glen
N LAW USE PLAY
EXISTING LAND USE
4
N
AL A .
it1A
inter an Orin
4.0
3
0
a
Attachment 3 Sherwood Glen
IlkNEIGHBO!"106D LAND USE PLAN
PROPOSED LAND USE
Ii
HOE;
1
Qi , — 1 / rJ • T.0 NO V5r r
All
so V0 ,4 0400"
ILL g 5' fit :.25 '
i
ISLAAF00 000C
so
0 RIo: soa :00,00"s 0 0 so Pog 0 0001 Ileo6o..669 e*o*6*o* 0*0 I_ — — — — - *
Itso
o
0. , - • • •
we '00
wo 40p
p.
so Or
i 1 •
loop
ft--.W wwwwwwo- 000- 00001"
or
1 i 1
WONOW
F--
1
Attachment 4 PROPERTY LINE MAP 4
N
Attachment 5
Sec. 36 -153. Use regulations.
In a BC Business and Corn_ mercial District in the city, the follow _
ing regulations shall apply:
1) Permitted uses: A building may be erected or used, and a lot
may be used or occupied, for any of the following - }purposes,
and no other:
a) Apartment for one family in combination with - business
use. -
b) Hotel, motel, tourist home, rooming house or boarding-
house.
c) Retail store, restaurant, office, agency, studio bank
personal service and craftsmen's shop, mortuary.
d) Automobile sales agency, used car lot, parking garage or
lot, provided all facilities are located and all services are
conducted on the lot.
e) Newspaper publishing, job printing establishment.
f) Theater.
g) Hand or automatic self - service laundry.
h) Bakery or confectionery shop, for the production ofP ar -
ticles to be sold only at retail on the premises.
i) Public garage or motor fuel station; P rovided that a
license to operate such business is first obtained from
the city council pursuant to chapter 17 of this Code. All
public garages and motor fuel stations must be so lo-
cated on the site and the site shall be of the size as
provided in section 36 -156 of this division which defines
kinds of operation, site area required and other data
relating to such business.
V) Any use of the same general character as any of the4
above permitted uses; provided that, no use which is
noxious or hazardous shall be permitted.
2) Special exceptions: The following uses are allowed when
authorized by the city council as a special excep
a) All uses permitted in R -3 Residence Districts, exceptP
the construction of dwelling houses permitted in divi-
sions 3 and 4 of this article, R -1 and R -2 Residence
Districts.
b) Processing and distributing station for milk or other
beverages, carting or hauling station. 1 '
c) Place of amusement, recreation or assembly, other than
a theater, when conducting indoors.
d) Yard for storage, sale and distribution of ice, coal, fuel
oil or building materials, when enclosed within a fence
of not less than six (6) feet in height, but not including
junkyard, salvage, automobile or other wrecking yard.
w
s
l
Sec. 36 -186. Permitted uses.
In M -1 Light Manufacturing istricts a buildingr. used and
g ding may be erectedoalotmaybeusedoroccupiedforanofthefoil
provided y owingPurposesandnoother; p d that, no use which is noxious orhazardousshallbepermitted:
a) Any use permitted in a BC Business 4an d Comm_ erci aI Dis-trict and SC Shopping Center District if the cou ` ' 'feed that such u _
ncil is sates-
use will not interfere with proper developmentoftheM -1 Light Manufacturing District but not _ -otherwise.
b) Wholesale business establishm
c) Trucking yard or terminal.
d) Custom shop for making articles or roduc
premises.
P is sold at retail onthepes.
e) Plumbing heating, glazing, painting, aPg, p p er hanging, roofing,ventilating and electrical contractors, blacksmith shopentry, soldering and welding shop.
car
1 Yard for storage, sale and distribution of i •
mater' ice, coal, fuel oil ofbuildinggals.
g) Commercial place of amusement recreatioo or assembly.
h) Bottling establishment.
G) Manufacturing as follows:
I) Canvas and canvas products.
II) Clothing and other textile products not including , ding man-ufacture of textiles. •
III) Electrical equipment, ap and supplies, upplies, manu-facture and assembly of, not including he elecgvY calmachinery.
IV) Food products, combining r processing includinggPgof, not
meat and fish.
V) Jewelry, clocks, watches.
VI) Leather products, including luggageVII) M
g gg ge and shoes.
Medical, dental or drafting equipment, opticalP , p goods.VIII) Musical instruments.
lbIX) Perfumes, pharmaceutical products cornpour ing of rub-ber products and synthetic treated fabrics not incl ud-
ing rubber and synthetic processing.X) Small products from the following previously rgPyp eparmaterials: Cork, feathers, felt, fur, glass, hair, horn a erplastics, shells. P P
XI) Tool dye and pattern making, and similar -small machineshops.
XII) Wood products, including furniture and boxes.
0 ) Carpet and rug cleaning.
k) Laundry, dry cleaning r d 1gYgp .ant.
1) Laboratory, research, experimental and testing. '
m) Any use of the same general character as any of the above
P uses, when authorized as a special exception bthecitycouncil. Y
n) Accessory use on the same lot with and -customarily inciden-tal to any of the above - permitted uses. (Code 1965 90 9.010;
A. Plan Amendment: Whitehlto Bear Avenue (North of Tracks
Associate Planner Johnson read •the notice of public hearing. TheendthelanduseplanfromRMand proposalistoam
White Bear Ave LSC to 6W for the east side ofAven
Chairman Axdahl asked i f .there was anyone present who wishedfeedontheproposa to comment
Dick Pearson " •1959 Why to Bear Avenue, owner of the -for a pl ark amendment, said he
e property conssagainstthedownzoning. He felt it woulddecreasethevalueoftheland. He s a i d Mr. Monette said he wished the zon 'to remain the same on the Pearson P Pro er ty. n9
Leona Wi ckl ander, owner of the ro er tY next to Mr. PeawhatconstructionPP rsons , questionedtionofwarehousesnexttoherwoulddo •home. to the value of their
Chairman Axdahl closed •the public hearing portion of the meeting.
t Commissioner He ' ny moved the Planning Commission recommendCatCouncilapprovaloftheresolu
to theLionrevisingthelandusetantocomplywiththepresentzoninofthe9proertsuchasSC.
Commissioner Prew seconded
The Commission discussed what land use category would be mostcompatiblwiththezoning.
Voting on the motion: Ay -
k, Sl etten
y Commissioners Axdahl , Barrett, FischerHeny, Si gmundi '
Nays -- Commissioner Prew
h
MEMORANDUM
m
TO: City Manager Action , r
FROM. Associate Planner -- Johnson
SUBJECT: Rezoning (BC to M- 1) ----LOCATION: White Bear Avenue, South of Count r0od --tyOWNER: oad gLiLi1iianWicklantlerand 'Richard PearsonAPPLICANT: City of Maplewood - Dave---
DATE : - April 14, 1983
s
Request
Rezone this property from BC, business •commercial to M -1, lght manufacture ng.
Reasons for Change
1. A Land Use Plan amendment (separate • n • . report) i s being proposed to chissit` from RM residential p P changet
9 ential medium density to BW, business warehouseinresponsetoCouncil's city-wi downzon i ng ro ram.P 9
21 No development ro osed i s •P P pending for the site.
Comments
This property, together with the property to •P P y the south, possesses sanitarysewerandaccesslimitations. (See Background Informatio 'M -1 zoning i s the b
g on Publicc Works .}best zoning alternative to recognize these limitations,M -1 zoning would be consistent with the ro osed L •of BW business P and Use Plan designationsswarehouse.
Recommendation (Requires at lea four votes for approval)
Approve the enclosed resolution atta •resolution ( attachment one) rezoningng the subjpropertyfromBC, business commercial to M -1, light manufacture ng.
r
BACKGROUND
Si Description
Acreage: 2.9
Existing Land Use: Undevelopedp -
Surroundin Land Uses
North : Kinney Shoes and singlee dwel 1 i n •
use
9 dwellings zoned and planned for commercial
East: City property containing a storm drainage ogpond
South: Construction related warehousing nd officeses
West: White Bear Avenue. Across the road a large tract of propertyplannedandpartiallydevelopedasBW, business warehouse use
11 -2 -61: Counci rezoned this site from R -1 res •commercial (attachment nta1 to BC, businesstwo). The pro osed use is not •
or minutes. p specified in the filee
0.
DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS
PI ann i ng
1. Land Use Plan designation: Present - RM-- residential •t i a l medium densityProposed - BW, business warehouse
2. Zoning: BC, business commercial (see attachment four)
3. Policies from the Plan:
a. Zoning maps should be updated as necessary o make b
s and y both land usemapszoningmapscompatible.
b. The BW, business warehouse land use classification •includes:udes .governmental and public utility b u i l d i n g s and structures storageandwarehousingfaciwholes
s age
ale business and office establish-ments, cartage and express facilities, radio and tel evi s i o n stationsandotherindustrialusesofalower - intensity nature.
4. Compliance with land use laws:
any instance where the citycouncil
Section 36 -485 of city code states that "Ina
or •
n this chapter,
the planninging commission is required to consider an exorchange exceptionincludingthezoningmap, in accordance withtheprovisionsofthischapter, the council or 1 ann i '
other things:
P ng commissionshall, among ngs:
a) Assure itself that the ro osed change •p p nge s consistent with the spirpurposeandintentofthischapter.
2
b) Determine that the ro osed change willl n injure
or detract from the use of neighbori
P P 9 of substantiallyly i n
g g property or from the
character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the propertyPy
iadjacenttotheareaincludedintheproposedchangeorplan s
adequately safeguarded.
c) Determine that the proposed change 'p p g will. _serve the best interests
and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the
public welfare."
Publ is Works
1. Development of this property will requireire a sewage liftft stat i o 'q 9 n faclPubliclyownedliftstationsshouldbeavoided, as recommended b the
Sewer Plan. .. y
Large structures, typical of M 1 uses, would. keep the
potential for subdivi of the site to a minimum. The fewer separate
property owners, the better the chances of a private agreement for
construction and maintenance of the facil
2. M -1 type development is also commer 'referred over businessP coal developmentbecausethenumberofpotentialturningmovementsontoandfromthe
property should be less. These turning movements, via uncontrolled inter -
secti ons , - are undesirable because they disrupt traffic flow along main
thoroughfares, such as White Bear Avenue. -
ADMINISTRATIVE
Procedure
I. Planning Commission recommendation
2. City Council holds a public hearing and makes a decision. At lea fourour
votes are requ i red for approval,
Jw
Enclosures
1. Resolution
2. Location Map
3. Property- Line - Map
4. BC District
5, M -1 District
K]
Attachment 1
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regul meeti of the City C •of the city of Maplewood, Minnesota was . duly ounce l
y called and held in the CouncilChambersinsaidCityonthedayofa .t x.00 p.m.
The following members were P resent:
The following members weree a bsent .
WHEREAS, the City of Map1 ewood initiated a rezoningezon ng from BC, businesscommercialtoM - 1, light manufacturi n for he following described property
The westerly 433 feet of the north 1/2 of the / e 1/4 of thenorthwest1/4 of Section 14, Town 29, Range 229 except the north333feetthereof,
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows
1. This rezoning was initiated b Ci of MaYyM pursuant tochapter36, a VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances,nances.
2. This rezoning was reviewed b the Maplewo •Y p od Pl ann ng CommissionsaononApril18, 1983. The Planning Commission recommended to theCityCouncilthatsaidrezoningPpbeapproved,
3. The Maplewood City Co •y nc l hel d a public hearing ontoconsthirezoning. Notice thereof was u •
ursua p blushed and mail-ed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were
to be heard
g egivenanopportunityYrdandpresentwrittenstatements.The Counci a l s o considered reports and recommeendations of thecitystaffandPlanningCommission,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PMA LEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that theabove- described rezoning be approved on the bass •of fact:s of the followingoweng f nd ngs
1. The zone change would be consistent with the intent of the Land UsePlan.
2. The change would not substantially inj .neighboring
y J ure or detract from the use ofghboringproperty.
3. The change would be in the best interest -t of the publicc by reducingthepotentialforapublicliftstationfacilit •ty and trafficc congests on .
Adopted this day of
Seconded by Ayes __
a '
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD) _
I, the undersigned, being he duly qualified9yq and appointed Clerk oftheCityofMaplewood, Minnesota do hereby certifytify that I have carefullycomparedtheattachedandforegoingextractofminutesofaregulararmeeti n9 9oftheCityofMaplewood, held on the dayY 1983,with the original on file i n my office, and the same i s full, a true and
complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to
Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal ofp the City this
day of 1983. -,
City Clerk
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
P-M
X044LMAN AVE.KOHLUAN AVE.
z7olROAD ~
40
EDGEHILL NO.Z
j 65
z DEMO NT u. AV
49 L
C ROOK AVE 3k
0 x
A lith AV
61 . , ,
T AWWSEX
GEGERVAISAV AVLRVAI
E'6 AWDVIEW
L
AV
VIKING F o R. CAS TLE
SHERFtEN AVE EN AYE.'.*
OPE AVE. OPE, AVE. .
LARK AVE. L A R X AVE LARK AVE.
40
25
j
RD :_T 2 [LAURIE z0
z IAUCAM4r% W
o r JUN [AVE.
Q IRK . E
NT ELDRIDG
4b ELMONI
46 =111S KILL ILIA
j
o RYAN
R . R. a
28 -- FROST v AVE
su
der
o
dw
Wokefield
Lok e 3
SOP z
40 3
40 z
PRI
o AVg.
Fln I @ f l
ST. PAUL
29
AVE.
J [PRICE X AVE
W —Yod
Attachment 2 LOCATION MAP
F W AV E.
62
0
oc FRISDIE AVE.
x
IL
10 so PH IA 44EYke
z Z
49
62
z
ILAJ P NT
su
der
o
dw
Wokefield
Lok e 3
SOP z
40 3
40 z
PRI
o AVg.
Fln I @ f l
ST. PAUL
29
AVE.
J [PRICE X AVE
W —Yod
Attachment 2 LOCATION MAP
4p;
IfB. B I
14
01p,
ZO20j-U. L7i A axs*r-11C
llb
O •
aWd hk&* D"* AVAM sum
400
Of
t - G .
14fe
P09
Ago .-
40
oeAPO
ir
40
000000'
Al -40
Sim
A NA
LJ
2
C'o LjNT
0 +
V
tFMETERI
Attachment 3
Rezone to M-1
PROPERTY LINE MAP 4
Sec. 36 -153. Use regulations.
In a BC Business and Commercial District in the city, the follow-
ing regulations shall apply.
1) Permitted uses. A building may be erected or used, and a lot
may be used or occupied, for any of the following purposes,
and no other.
a) Apartment for one famil y in combination with business
use.
b) Hotel, motel, tourist home, rocming house or boarding-
house.
c) Retail store, restaurant, off' agency, studio, bank,
personal service and craftsmen's shop, mortuary.
d) Automobile sales agency, used car lot, parking garage or
lot, provided all facilities are located and all services are
conducted on the lot.
e) I` publishing, job printing establishment.
f) Theater.
g)_ Hand or automatic self - service laundry.
h) Bakery or confectionery shop, for the production of ar-
ticles to be sold only at retail on the premises.
i) Public garage or motor fuel station; provided that a
license to operate such business is first obtained from
the city council pursuant to chapter 17 of this Code. All
public garages and motor fuel stations must be so lo-
cated on the site and the site shall be of the size as
provided in section 36-156 of this division uThich defines
kinds of operation, site area required and other data
relating to such business.
G) Any use of the same general character as any of the
above' permitted uses; provided that, -no use which is
noxious or hazardous shall be permitted.
2) Special exceptions: The following uses are allowed when
authorized by the city council as a special exception:
a) All uses permitted in R -3 Residence Districts, except
the construction of dwelling houses permitted in divi-
sions 3 and 4 of this article, R -1 and R -2 Residence
Districts.
b) Processing and distributing station for milk or other
beverages, carting or hauling station.
c) Place of amusement, recreation or assembly, other than
a theater, when conducting indoors.
d) Yard for storage, sale and distribution of ice, coal, fuel
oil or building materials, when enclosed within a fence
of not less than six (6) feet in height, but not including
junkyard, salvage, automobile or other wrecking yard.
r
s
t
i
t
Sec. 36 -186. Permitted uses. .
In M -I Light Manufacturing istricts 'g _ , a budding may be erectedorused, and a lot may be used or occupied for an of thy e foIlowjpurposesandnoother; provided that no use whichhazPted:ardous shall be ermit
is noxious or
a) 'Any use permitted in a BC Bu ' Dis-and Commercial I31s_trict and SC Shopping Center District, . .ct if the council is satisfledthatsuchusewillnotinterferewithroerdev1
of the M -1 Light Manufacturing
P P e opment
g anufacturing District, but not otherwise.
b) Afholesale business est.ablishm ents.
c) Trucking yard or terminaL
d) Custom shop for making articlees or products sold at retail onthepremises.
Plumbing, heating, glazing, painting, a erhan in r
ventilating and
P F g g, oofing,r
g electrical contractors, blacksmith shop,
Pbgentry, soldering and welding sho
p car
f) Yard for storage, sale and distributi on of ice, coal, fuel oil orbuildingmaterials.
g) Commercial place of amusement recreation or assembly.
h) Bottling establishment.
i) Manufacturing as follows:
I) Canvas and canvas products.
II) Clothing and other textile products not inclu ding man-
ufacture of textiles. •
III) Electrical equipment, ap andPP supplies, manu-
facture and assembly of, not including ex elec
machinery.
g vy trical
IV) Food products, combining r processing •g P ng of, not
meat and fish. -
V) Jewelry, clocks, watches.
VI) Leather prod ucts,including luggage and shoes.
VII) Medical, dental or drafting equipment, optical goods.P g
VIII) Musical instruments.
IX) Perfumes, pharmaceutical products, com undin of rub -Po g
ber products and synthetic treated fabrics not IDClud-
ing rubber and synthetic processing.
X) Small products from the following p . g p usly prepared
materials: Cork, feathers, felt, fur, glass, hair, horn, a
plastics, shells. P,
XI) Tool dye and pattern making, and similar sma ma-
chine sbops.
XII) Wood products, including furniture and boxes.
G) Carpet and rug cleaning.
k) Laundry, dry cleaning or dyeing Pla.nt.
i
i -
i
J
t
1
f
1) Laboratory research, experiments] and testing .
m) Any use of the same eneral characg ter as any of the above -.
permitted uses, wben a utbori zed as a special exception bthecitycounc.y
n) Accessory use on the same lot with an • -d customarily lncden- _tal to any of the above - permitted uses. (Code 196 909.010-
c
A. Rezoning: White Bear Avenue (South of County Road B)
Associate Planner Johnson said the ro osal i
h t manufacturing,
p P s to rezone the propertytoM - 1, l i g
Chairman Axdahl. asked if there was anyone present who wi shed to commentontheproposal, _
Commissioner He j ny ,moved the Planning - .Comma ss ion recommend to the CCoudenialoftheProDosedzonechane.
Commissioner Fischer seconded - -Ayes - -Commi ss i oners Axdahl , Barrett,Fischer, Hejny, Prew, Si gmundi k, S1 etten.
l
MEMORANDUM
r
Action by Council:
To City Manager
FROM: Associate Planner--Johnson Endor
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit--Home Occupation 14C fJe
LOCATION: 1564 East Grandview Avenue z •eC tc _APPLICANT /OWNER: David S. Suby
I DATE: April 13, 1983 ca.a...,..,e..-
SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL
Requ
Approval of a conditional use permit to operate a tool sharpening service as a
home occupation.
Proposal
1. See attachment two. '
2. The shop area would be located in the basement and consist of an area about
10 x 15 feet or about 16 percent of the basement area.
3. If a sign is posted, it would be no greater than two square feet, mounted
flush against the ' dwel l ing.
4. Noise from the sharpening tools would not be detectable off -site.
5. No more than two customers are expected on the premises at any one time.
Ample off -.site parking is available in the ex driveway.
60' Once established, the applicant will pursue arrangements with local
hardware stores to reduce the number of customers dealt with from his home.
Comments
The proposal is consistent with the requirements for a home occupation . and
issuance of a conditional use permit.
ParnmmandAf i nn
Approval of the enclosed resolution (attachment one), authorizing David Suby
to operate a tool sharpening service as a home occupation at 1564 East Grandview,
subject to obtaining a license each January.
BACKGROUND
Site Descri tion
I : Size: 10,1.22' s uare feetq _
2. Existing Land Use: Rambler style,yle, single dwelling, approximately 912 feetinareawafullbasement
S- urroundi n Land Uses `
North: Grandview Avenue, across thee street single dwellings.
East, South and West: Single dwellings9
Past Actions
10- 16 -80: Council authorized John Monette to operate a power -tool repair businessat2060BarclayStreetasahomeoccupation.
Planning
1. Land Use Designation: RL, residential lower density
2. Zoning: R -1 , Residence Distri (single dwel ling)
3 . Compliance with land use laws:
A. Section 904.010 (old code re ui res a •
which involve customers )
Q special exception permit for homoccupationswhiPe
tomers on the premises. Permit approvalissubjectto, but not limited to, the following -requirem
1. Not more than one erson ot -P er than members of the family residing onthepremises, shall be al 1 owed to engage i n such occupati9pton.
2. An area equivalent to no more than 20% of each 1 evel fo the dwellingunitflareashallbeusedintheconductofahomeeoccupation.
3. There shall be no change in the outside appearance f 'pp e o the building1d ng orpremises, that would indicate the conduct of a home occupation,n meeting
otherthanonesi9tngtherequirementsofthecitysigncode.
4 Limited retail sales f •o projects produced off-sitto may be permitted,but only when subordinate to the principal acti vi t iy( es) of the homeoccupat
S. No traffic shall be generated by a home aoccu ti onP in greater volumesthanwouldnormallbeexpectedinaresidentialneighborhood. The need
parking
g edforoff - street p g shall not exceed more than three off - street arki n
ati on at an • -
p gspacesforhomeoccupationygiventime, i n addition to the parkingspacesrequiredbytheresidentoccupants.
6. No equipment or process shall be used in such home occupation 'whichcreatesnoise, vibration, glare, fumes, odors or electrical interferencedetectable 'to the normal senses off '
erence
the lot. . I n the case of electricalinterference, no equipment or process shall be used 'which creates visual
2 -
or audible interference in any radio or television receivers off the
premises, or causes fluctuations in l i n e voltage off the premises
7. No fire, safety or health hazard shall exist.
8. A home occupation shall not include the repair of internal combustion
engines, body shops, machine shops, welding, ammunition manufacturin
or other objectionable uses as determined by the City. Machine shops
are defined as places where raw metal is fabricated, using machines
that operate on more than 120 volts of current.
9. Any violation of these requirements shall result in the denial or
revocation of the home occupation.
10. The City may waive any of these requirements if the home occupation is
located at least 350 feet from an adjoining residential use.
ll. Approval shall be for a period not to exceed one year. Renewal shall
be subject to the provisions of Section 826 of the City licensing code.
B. Section 36 -6 (Definitions) defines a conditional use permit as "a use
requiring a special use or special exception permit."
C. Section 36 -442 (b) requires the following findingsndins for granting a conditional999
use permit:
1. The use is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with
the purpose and standards of this chapter.
2. The establishment or maintenance of the use shall not be detrimental to-
the public health, safety or .general welfare.
3. The use shall be located, designed, maintained and operated to be com-
patible with the character of that zoning district.
4. The use shall not depreciate property values.
5. The use shall not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present
and potential surrounding land uses, due to noises, glare, smoke, dust,
odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsight-
liness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
6. The use shall generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets
and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs
that will .cause undue burden to the area properties.
7. The use shall be served by essential public services,-sueh as streets,
police, fire protection, u t i l i t i e s , schools and parks.
8. The use shall not create excessive additional requirements at public
cost for public facilities and services; and shall not be detrimental
to the welfare of the City.
9. The use shall preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
3 -
features into the development design.
10. The use shat 1 cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
D. Section 826.020 (old code) requires the annual renewal and licensing,
during the month of. January, to continue operation of an approved home
occupation.
E. Section 36 -442 (c) states that the city council, in granting a conditional
use permit, may attach to the permit such conditions and guarantees as may be
necessary for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare,
Building Official
The applicant agreed to install a hand railing on the open side of the stairway
to the basement.
Citizen Commen
Of eight neighboring property owners surveyed, no objections were received.
Procedure
1. Planning Commission recommendation
2. City Council decision following a public hearing
mb
Enclosures
1. -Resolution
2.Applicant's Letter
3.Location Map
4.Property Line Map
4 -
Attacnment . j
Pursuant to due call and 'note ce thereof, a regular meeting of the City CounciloftheCityofMaplewood, Mi nnesota w
unc 1
as duly called and held i n the CouncilChambersinsaidCityonthedayof .Y ,1983 a t 7.00 D. m.
The following members were P resent •
The following members were absent:
WHEREAS, David Suby requested a conditional use er •en i n businessne
p ml t to operate a toolsharpening9ssasahomeoccupationatthefollowin - descri bed r9property:
Lot 5, Block 2, KROISS addition S •Section 10, Township 29, Range 22
This property is also known as 1564 Grad .Grandview Avenue, Maplewood,
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional ' -Y n ti onal use permit s as follows
I. This conditional use ermitP request was i n i t i a t e d by David Suby,pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This conditional use permit request was reviewed by the MaplewoodPlanningCommissiononApri118 , 1983. The Planning Commission
Co
i ss onrecommendedtotheCityynci1thatsaiddrequestbe
3. The Maplewood City Council d a public cheld hearing on
1983, to consi this conditional use ermit reque 'P q est. Notice thereofwaspublishedandmailedpursuanttolaw. All ersons present. 'were givenn
P P. ent- at saiddhearing9geanopportunitytobeheardandpresentwrittenstatements. The Council also considered reports and recommendationssta
p endati onsofthecityyfandPlanningCommission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE
d MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described conditional use perm-it be approved on the basis •of fact: P s of the followingoweng f nd ngs
I. The proposal would be consistent with all of the requirements forauthorizationofahomeoccupation.
2. The use would be consistent with all applicableicable r •PP equrements for issuanceofaconditionalusepermit. •
3. Approval is subject, to obtaining a licensecease each January.
Adopted this day of 1983
Seconded by Ayes—
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY-OF RAMSEY ) SS.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
I , the undersigned, bei the duly qual if i ed and appointed Cl erk of the Ci tyofCplewood, Minnesota, do he certify that I have carefully compared the
j attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the Ci of
Maplewood,a p , held on the day of 1983 , with the originalinal on
in m office and h •y, y the same s a full, , true and complete transcript therefrom
insofar as the same relates to
a
Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporateorate seal of the City this
F day of 1983.
City Clerk
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
ATTACHMENT TWO
This Home Occupation Business Permit consideration is for
Tool Sharpening Service.
Sharpening services will include
s .Lawn mower blades
Circular saws
Hand saws
Skates -
Knives
S i s sors , Shears
Drill bits
ry
Chain saw blades
The Sharpening Service will be owner operated and P art time.
Business hours will be evening hours of 6 -- 0g93 P.m. Monday
through Friday. Saturday hours of 9:00 a.m. - 6:00 P .m.
Business facilities will be housed in a'sho areape of the
basement.
The prinicipal sharpening equipment will be a FOLEY 1055
SHARP -ALL sharpener and a FOLEY 2080 belt rinder. . Thishis
equipment is powered by 110 volt, 60 cycle AC, 2 H.P.
electric motors,
I .
36
10001
7- - W_
KONLMAN AVE.A VJE/
CC y1gy •
44
ROAD
SHE
OPE C
c
RK AVE. _ 4^
J2 1 1.: -4 1rp_LARK AVE
zCOUNTY01 * LAURIE E RD. °
z
Z
dw
25ILELANO zIc
0 1 SANDI z
z @
JUN c 10 N A VE 64
U RKE llu kK E AYEZ
EL DRIDG AV E. A%. OD4
ELMON AVE. ks
j
w PUBLIC WORKSIl
BLDG.64
VE v SKIILLMA La 4 AVE. Z
HA
0000'
AVE.
o
L
C21
40 to a 0) 28 ;A —
5
d:
Su, ER A
dop
Wakefield
CCCie49
SOP AVE Lok e
z z
PRI
AVE
F1 FIF] n,
Qlr DAI 11
L
RE C
0
1
FROST Lo Lml
7 W Fri N AVE.
FRISDIE AVE.
116
Lake - ...... A, PH IA AVE
Pha /ern
w
z z
j
62
LAJ P NT
wo.
30 llf]Fll
0
0
j
cr
c
IL1 - 01-- —
W 49
w
KOHLMAN
I
It
V E.
23 ::
t.A
AVE.
E6LEAVIL
0
IF
ATTACHMENT 3 LOCATION MAP 4
AS
Z
j co
w
cr
W
cr
L) - AVE 0
w z
00, w
Q
w
4 J
u
77.
GERVAIS AV
36
10001
7- - W_
KONLMAN AVE.A V JE/
CC y1gy •
44
ROAD
SHE
OPE C
c
RK AVE. _ 4^
J2 1 1.: -4 1rp_LARK AVE
zCOUNTY01 * LAURIEE RD. °
z
Z
dw
25ILELANO zIc
0 1 SANDI z
z @
JUN c 10 N A VE 64
U RKE llu kK E AYEZ
EL DRIDG AV E. A%. OD4
ELMON AVE. ks
j
w PUBLIC WORKSIl
BLDG.64
VE v SKIILLMA La 4 AVE. Z
HA
0000'
AVE.
o
L
C21
40 to a 0) 28 ;A —
5
d:
Su, ER A
dop
Wakefield
CCCie49
SOP AVE Lok e
z z
PRI
AVE
F1 FIF] n,
Qlr DAI 11
L
RE C
0
1
FROST Lo Lml
7 W Fri N AVE.
FRISDIE AVE.
116
Lake - ...... A, PH IA AVE
Pha /ern
w
z z
j
62
LAJ P NT
wo.
30 llf]Fll
0
0
j
cr
c
IL1 - 01-- —
W 49
w
KOHLMAN
I
It
V E.
23 ::
t.A
AVE.
E6LEAVIL
0
IF
ATTACHMENT 3 LOCATION MAP 4
I
ATTACHMENT 4
PROP ERTY LINE MAP 4
N
V
J tie r _ v: q S r .. r ti-' b• -t ;aC M i
154.7,t 1155 5 11563 1571 579 587 1
J 2366 115,56 - - - ,2 .1580 588 1596.
P
1549
111
155. 1565-s •5 11583, 0595.
ttSER 1 f
pk
Gi
owl
Tp es gg
or,IL
I
ATTACHMENT 4
PROP ERTY LINE MAP 4
N
Conditional Use Permit: 1564 Grandview (Su Lr
Associate Planner Johnson said the proposal1 •p p s to operate a tool sharpeningservasahomeoccupation. Staff is recommending approval
Mr. Suhy .was present at the meeting and indicated he had nothing to add
Ptothestaffreport
g
Chai rman Axdahl 'asked i f there was anyone present who wished to comment
Cbmmi s s i oner Sl etten moved the Planning Commi recommend approval
of the resolution, authorizing David Suby jo o erate a tool sharpen in
service as a home occupation 1564 Grandview, subject to obtai ni_n4_ a _1_i cense
each January ,.
Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes - - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett,
Fischer, Hejny, Prew, Si gmundi k, S1 etten.
MEMORANDUM Action by Councol
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
Endorsod... ,_.
City Manager Modifie
Director of Community Development R oc o
Rezoning (BC to R -1 and F) DateSherrenAve. , ..Barclay St, and the north side oft Ave,
CityCit Council -
April 7. 1983
SUMMARY
Re nest
Rezone the lots abutting Sherren Avenue and Barclay Street to a zone consistentwiththeLandUsePlan.
Comments
The City Counc 1 initia th_i rezoningsr 'n a program.1 g s part o f its downzon i ngThisiswherethezoningallowsagreaterintensoflandusethan `
b
n 1SproposedytheLandUsePlan. This rezon would be consistent with theLandUsePlanwouldeliminatethedevelopmentofpotentialnuisance . P usesthatcoulddevelopunderBC, business commercial zoning,9
There are two problems with the BC zone i n •this area:
1. The existing homes are nonconforming uses under the BC zone, Thi s meansthatthesehomescannotbeexpandedwithoutaconditionalusepermitfromthecitycouncil.
2. The BC zone would allow the conversion of exi'sti n homeses to commercial uses,which may not be compatible with the neighborhood,
An F, farm residence zone is recommended or 2291f Hazelwood Avenue to allow the,continued sale of agricultural products that are roduced on the remises.P p
Recommendation
Approval of the enclosed resol rezoning the lots abuttingting Sherren Avenue,Barclay Street and the north side of Cope Avenue to R -1, resideden 'ce districtsingledwellng) , except for a rezoning to F farm re
wood Avenue.
9 residence for 2291 Hazel -
TO
BACKGROUND
Existing Land Use _
Sing dwelling homes
Surrounding Land Uses
Northerly: Highway 36
Easterly: Audio King and a photographic studio
Southerly: Cope Avenue and single dwellings
Westerly: Dayton's Bluff Sheet Metal
5- 19 -55: The New Canada Town Board rezoned this si from farm to business.
Planning
1. Land Use Plan designation: RL, residential lower 'density
2. The
a
RL' designation i s primarily for a varie of - 'y y single dwelling homes.An occasional double dwelling is allowed,
3. Zoning maps should be updated as necessary to make both 1-andY use maps and
zoning maps compatible.
4. Section 36 -485 of city code states that "In an instance whereyee the cicouncilortheplanningcommissionisrequiredtoconsideranexception
n9orchangei this chapter, including the zoning map, in accordance withap •
the provisions of this chapter, the council or planning commission shall
among other things: '
a. Assure itself that the proposed change i s consistent with '9 th the. spirt,
purpose and intent of this chapter.
b. Determine that the proposed change will not substantially i or
detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character .
of the neighborhood, and the use of the property adjacent to the area
included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
c. Determine that the proposed change will serve the best intereststerests
and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the publicwelfare."
5. Zoning: BC, business commercial
6. The BC zone allows a wide rang of commercial us (See '9 es. attachment six.
7. The R -1 zone would limit the use of the ro ert to sin 1 =dwel 'P P Y g e 1 ngs.
2-
d ADMINISTRATIVE
Procedure
1. Planning Commission recommendation
s
2. City Council holds a public hearing and makes a decision . - At least
four votes are required for approval,
jw .
Enclosures:
1. Resolution (rezoning to R -1)
2. Resolution (rezoning to F)
3. Location Map
4. Property Line Map
5. Land Use Plan
6. BC Zone
3-
Attachment One: Resolution (Rezoning to R -1)
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of-Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council
Chambers in said City on the day of 1983 at 7:00 p.m.
The following members were present:
The following members were absent: -
WHEREAS, the city council initiated a rezoning from BC, business commercial
to R -1, residence district (single dwelling) for an area bounded by the center-
lines of Highway 36, Cope Avenue, Hazelwood Avenue and Sherren Avenue, the east
l i n e of lots one and 20, block two, Moritz Addition and the east l i n e of the
east 39 acres of the north half of the southwest quarter of section 10, township
29, range 22."
This area includes the following parcels:
1. Unpl atted land, subject to streets, described as the west 137 feet of
the south 150 feet of the east 39 acres of the north half of the south-
west quarter of section 10, township 29, range 22.
2. Unpl atted land described as the west 137 feet of the north 90 feet of
the south 330 feet of the east 39 acres of the north half of the south-
west quarter of section 10, township 29, range 22.
3. Unplatted land described as the west 137 feet of the north 90 feet of
the south 240 feet- of the east 39 acres of the north half of the east
39 acres of the north half of the southwest quarter of section 10,
township 29, range 22.
4. Blocks one and two, Moritz Addition
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1. This" rezoning was initiated by the Maplewood City Council, pursuant to
Chapter 36, article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on
April 18, 1983. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council
that said rezoning be
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 1983
to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed
pursuant to law.. All persons present at said hearing were given. an
opportunity to be heard and present written statements. ,The Council
also considered reports and recommendations of the city taff and
Planning Commission.
4
o
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that theabove-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the f •of fact:ollowng f1ndngs
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, ri t purposep P p e and intentofthezoningordinance -and, Comprehensive Plan,
2. The proposed change w i l l not substantial l i 'urey or detract from theuseofneighboringpropertyorfromthecharacterofthe - neighborhood,and that the _use of the property adjacent to the areaproposedchangeois-adequately
included i n the
P P g r plan safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the b •best interests and conveniences ofthecommunity, where applicable, and the public welfare
Adopted this day of 1983.
Seconded by Ayes --
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD )
I, the undersigned, being the duly ual i fi ed and appointedqpponted Clerk of theCityofMaplewood, Minnesota , - do hereby certify that I have carefull comparedtheattachedandforegoingextractofminutesofaregulararmeeofMaplewood, 9 tang of the Cityp , od , held on the day of , 1983 , with the original o f 'office and the a
n aleinmySameisafull, true and complete transcript therefrominsofarasthesamerelatesto
the City t dayof
Witness my hand as such Clerk and corporateorate seal f
1983.
City Clerk
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
Attachment Two: Resolution (Rezoning to F)
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council
Chambers in said City on the day of 1983 at 7:00 p.m.
The.following members were present:
The following members were absent:
WHEREAS, the city council initiated a rezoning from BC, business commercial
to F. farm residence for an area bounded by the centerlines of Sherren Avenue,
Hazelwood Avenue and Cope Avenue, and the east line of lots one and 20, block
two, -.Moritz Addition.
This area includes the following parcel:
an unplatted parcel described as the south 280 feet of the east 288
feet of the northeast quarter 'of the southwest quarter (subject to
roads) in section 10, township 29, range 22 -- commonly known as 2291
Hazelwood Avenue.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1. This rezoning was initiated by pursuant to
Chpater 36, article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning - Commi s.si on on
April 18, 1983. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council
that said rezoning 'be .
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on
to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed
pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an
opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The,.-Council
also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and
Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY.THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-
described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findingsindins of fact
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent
of the zoning ordinance and Comprehensive Plan.,
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the
use of neighboring property or from the character of theL neighborhood,
and that the use of the property adjacent to the area i ml uded in the
proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The Proposed chan will serve the best interests and conveniences ofthecommunitwhereapplicable, and the public welfare.
Adopted this da of 1983.
Seconded b Ayes
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY Ss.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
I, the undersi bein the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of theCityofMaplewood, Minnesota, do hereb certif that I have carefull comparedtheattachedandforegoinextractofminutes*of a re meetin of theCityofMaplewood, held on the da of
9 1983, with theorionfileinmoffice, and the same is a ful1, true and complete tran-script therefrom insofar as the same relates to
Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City • thisdaof1983.
City Clerk
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
i
W
V
SOW
c lorr
Qv
GERVAIS AV
D omly
ARK LAVE.
25
c Q
ELELAWQJ
o JUM T1 N AVE.
KILL MA
F
RECR s lON
li JAW
ON AVE. -
t i'Rtsoll AVE.rnr
D" 1Ntl a&
dONT AV =
3
A If M AVE.
At AVE
COURT c
ASTLE
C i
Cewsr. B3 w AWE. ='•
Or V 'E.
LARK AVE,
T
et L.AURtE ' %RO ::
AVE. 65 W .:
25
Q
out ••
RrLtt: wo'trct
0
00 = •
ZS ~: 'EW000 AVE. .
29
r
AK
Attachment
LOCATION MAP'4
N
N?M
i
VE.
i
W
V
SOW
c lorr
Qv
GERVAIS AV
D omly
ARK LAVE.
25
c Q
ELELAWQJ
o JUM T1 N AVE.
KILL MA
F
RECR s lON
li JAW
ON AVE. -
t i'Rtsoll AVE.rnr
D" 1Ntl a&
dONT AV =
3
A If M AVE.
At AVE
COURT c
ASTLE
C i
Cewsr. B3 w AWE. ='•
Or V 'E.
LARK AVE,
T
et L.AURtE ' %RO ::
AVE. 65 W .:
25
Q
out ••
RrLtt: wo'trct
0
00 = •
ZS ~: 'EW000 AVE. .
29
r
AK
Attachment
LOCATION MAP'4
N
oil
st,,t of
11
GRANOVIE Vol --AV E. .0 a
v GRAN J?v I E
10 - Iw ^V r—
z
f
SERVICL 1vF'DR L
k - -- - — 1w do M
IL a
ter
p
k _mo 41
i ` —i • - 1_ ;_• j.: - = ,;. !_,Z , t_I...t- i_t.•t+ta1:.;. If I
Ir
VI 160
AV E -r L
1 4 1011
tJ- L I 4
T
ROAL
OV-1 4W
I ..1•.1
I I I I r .-0
X
Ir + •0 &
L 1 ". $ :4 % r
Kt]
t t 1 ' I _ f .. • - - t ;,,,, l • I _r l •' • . • • I T, -I
z --4- 4— t fh'tj- L
I 'jog TC FF <rrr
cc4i — t• 1 t_,_ :1 f i t l
i m 11 1 f 1 1 1II __ i f I I f I I I.
7
PROPERTY* LINE MAP
Attachment 4
4
N
IMP
s
j 1
i
interchan
Os
ti 1.
1O`• '
1W
O
1
n
O
eD Y Q
AL Jk,' 1 ! 1
1
r
o.•
O
1
O .
O '
t
n
Sherwood Glen
NEIGHBOIlr"1061) LAND USE PLAY
Attachment 5
I
interch
1
t
P:S
7=T -
k
Dl YIS) ON 7. BC BUSINESS AND CO1 I hiERCIAL D1STRlCT
w '
Sec. 36 -153. Use regulations.
In a BC Business and Commercial District in th e city, the follow-
ing regulations shall apply-, •
1) Permitted uses: A building may be erected or used and a lot
may be used or occupied, for any of the followin ur os
an 'no other_
a) Apartment for one family in combination with business '
use_
b) Hotel, motel, tourist home, room Louse o _g r boarding -
ous
c) Recall store, restaurant, office agency, studio _bank,
personal ser%ice and craftsmen's shop, mortuary_ `
d) Automobile sales agency, used car lot, parking
g
a orara -g g
lot, provided all facilities are located and all services are
col; ducted on the lot_
e) I ' publishing; job printing estblishment. •
M -Theater. -
g) Hand or automatic self - service launAry. - •' -
h) Bakery or confectionery shop, for the production of ar-
ticles be sold only st retail on the premises.
G) Public garage or motor fuel station; provided that a
license to operate such business is first obtained from
the city council pursuant to chapter 17 of this Code- All
public garages .and motor fuel 'stations must be so lo-
sated on the site and the site shall be of the size as
provided in section 36 -156 of this di g 2sion which defines •
kinds of operation, site area required and other data
relating tc such business - -
j)Any use of . the same general character as any of the
above permuted uses; provided that, no use whu is
noxious or hazardous shall be permitted.
2) Special exceptions: The following uses are allowed when
authorized by the city council ass special exception:
t ,a) All uses permitted in R -3 Residence Districts excepptheconstructionofdwellinghousespermittedindivi-
sions 3 and 4. of this article, R -1 and R -2 Residence
Districts.
b) Processing and distributing station for milk or otheer
beverages, carting or hauling station.
c) Place of amusement, recreation or assembly, .other than
a theater, when conducting indoors.
d) Yard for storage, sale and distribution of ice coal, fueloilorbuildingmaterials, when enclosed within a fence
of not less than six (6) feet in height, but not including
junkyard, salvage, automobile or otber wrectib yCode1965907.010- W'.'g y
Ord. No. 232, § 3,10 - 14-67; Ord.No. 256,11- 20 -69; Ord. No. 402,5 I 8- 12 - 76)
I
t
Zone Change: Sherren,. Barcl a and Copeep 3
Associate Planner Johnson said the ro osaipP is to rezone the propertytomakeitconsistentwiththeLandUsePlan.
Chairman Axdahl asked if there
I
was anyone presen 'y p nt who wished to comment.
was.
Sylvester Unerdl , 1495 Sherren , asked what the diffe in the zonn
Staff explained what was permitted in the BC zone and the R -1 zone.
Commissioner Fischer moved. the Plan Commi recommend to theSAYCounci1aroyaloftheresolutionsrezonint '9 e 1 ots abuttingSherrenAvenue, Barcla Street and the north side of Coe Avenue to R -1excetforarezonitoFfor2291HazelwoodAvenue.
Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes m 'T_
Commissioner o m ss loners Axdahl , Barrett,Fischer, Heyny, Prew, Sigmundik, S1etten.
MEMORANDUM
TO:City Manager
FROM:Director of Community Development
SUBJECT:Rezoning - -BC to BC(M)
LOCATION:2310 and 2300 Hazelwood Ave,
APPLICANT:City Council
QWNERS:2300 Hazelwood--James Refrigeration Co.
2310 Hazelwood--MAT Properties, Inc.
SUMMARY
Action
Endo
0
Re uest
Rezone the site to a zoning consistent with the land use plan.
Reason for the request
The city council initiated this rezoning as part of its "downzon i ng" program.
This is where the zoning allows a greater intensity of land use than is proposed
by the city's land use plan.
A BC, business commercial zone would allow uses that may not be compatible with
the residential neighborhood to the west or the LSC, limited commercial designation
for 2310 and 2300 Hazelwood Avenue on the land use plan. A BC zone allows all
types of commercial uses, including fast food restaurants, auto sales and repair,and outdoor commercial recreation. There was neighborhood opposition to the
previous request for a used car lot at 2310 Hazelwood Avenue. A BC(M) zone would
permit the existing uses, wh i e limiting more intensive auto oriented businesses.
Recommendation
Approval of the enclosed resolution rezoning 2300 and 2310 Hazelwood Avenue from
BC, business commercial to BC(M), business commercial modified.
BACKGROUND
Site Descriptions
2310: a 1.2 acre lot developed with an Audio King Store
2300: a 1.5 acre lot developed with a photographic studio
There is a city. stormwater easement that cuts diagonally across the . rear of
the two lots.
Surrounding Land Uses
Northerly: Highway 36
Easterly: drainage pond
Southerly: Cope Avenue
Westerly: Hazelwood Avenue and single dwellings
Past Actions and Uses
2310 Hazelwood: The b u i l d i n g was first used as a filling station . Council then
issued a used car license in 1979.
2300 Hazelwood: The building was fi rst * used as a small grocery store and was
later used for a repair shop for recreational vehicles.
DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
Planning
1. Land Use Plan designation: LSC, limited service commercial
2. The limited commercial center -classification refers to commercial facilities
on a neighborhood scale. Heavy industrial uses, department stores, motels, auto
accessory stores, etc. would be prohibited, while other land uses of medium
intensity nature would be permitted subject to meeting certain P erformancestandards.
3. Zoning maps s.houl d be updated as necessa to make both land use maps and
zoning maps compatible.
4. Section 36 -485 of city code states that "In an instance where 'y e he a .the citycouncilortheplanningcommissionisrequiredtoconsideranexception or
change in this-chapter, including the zoning map, in accordance with the
provisions of this chapter, the council or Planning ommission a m9shaotherthings
a) Assure itself that the proposed change i s cons i s "g tent with =the spi rl t,
purpose and intent of this chapter.
b) Determine that the ro osed chang willPP9 not substantially inure or
detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of
the neighborhood, and that the use of the prop adjacent tothe
2
area included i n the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded,
c) Determine that the proposed change will serve the best interests and
conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare."
5. Zoning: BC (business commercial) (See attachment five.)
6. The BC zone allows a wide range of commercial uses.
7:= The BC (M) zone is similar to the BC zone, but prohibits drive-up facilities
for restaurants, outdoor commercial recreation, auto sales and public
garages. (See attachment six.)
ADMINISTRATIVE
mb
Ens
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Procedure
1. Planning Commission recommendation
2. City Council holds a public hearing and makes a decision. At least four
votes are required for approval.
closures
Resolution
Location Map
Property Line Map
Land Use Plan
BC District
BC (M) District
ATTACHMENT ONE: RESOLUTION
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof , a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of .Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council
Chambers of said City on the day of , 1983 at 7:00 p.m.
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council initiated a rezoning from BC, business
commercial to a zone consistent with the city's land use plan for an area
bounded by the centerlines of Highway 36, - Hazelwood Avenue and Cope Avenue, and
the east line of lot 9, E. G. Roger's Garden Lots,
This area includes that portion of lot 9, E* G. Roger's Garden Lots south
of the centerline of Highway 36 more commonly described as 2310 and 2300 ;
Hazelwood Avenue,
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
I. This rezoning was initiated D the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter
36, article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on
April 18, 1983. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council
that said rezoning be
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 1
9 1983
to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed
pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an
opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council
also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and
planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL THAT THE
above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings
of fact.
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent
of the zoning ordinance and Comprehensive Plan.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the
use of the neighboring property or from the character of the neighbor-
hood and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included
in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of
the community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
No
Adopted this day of 1983
Seconded by Ayes --
I
STATE OF MINNESOTA }
COUNTY OF RAMSEY } SS.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD }
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointedinted C1 rofMaPPClerk of theCityMaplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully comparedomparedtheattachedandforegoingextractofminutesofaregularmeetingoftheCityofMaplewood, held on the day f - •yy , 1983, with the originalnal on fileeifl.. my office, and the same is a full , true and complete transcript therefromi4sofarasthesamerelatesto
P re rom
Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate •
day of , 1983.
seal of the City this
Ci ty Clerk
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
In
E
000
C ON ST
O •
WZvCOU 91
P _,
ILELANDI
0 JUN gTION
W lei
OWL,,0: j?ECREAl"
FROST L
ld irgr
JL
VEM
0
If ft AVE.
MIS RIA AVE
COURT
TLIE
AVE
0 VIE.
AVE .
ICS' @
7 .
s
64
AY-L
Jl
PIC 0100
0 SLDL z.
46
4
4,00000
t
AVE.
29
28
Now
Attachment 2
LOCAT MAP
i
Oki-
St-Lire .t *Al f
s P r a 1
V.
1 `Ili •w *
11Jl _- r - 1 , t it i r.T . -
S
tiRANDVIEW -- AV ; -»r GR ASV Ov1 w Av E . , t
Cj
u —?--: I — em Lt, j
SERv it " A
t - - —DRIVE
L'•Y. L•1 G ~ '7 ea = . 1 9 - 7 "1 = i * 1 4
KEN AVE - U
vi
C stt a
y J f t Z ; • j - -
4 :a U --- ?-- 0 - ?300 -
14 Ir 2291
41,
4420 i ! I t I 1 t _
IN 60 4
fill X.
Li
J t t t f 1 1 ( t j
1 _ . S. - -- t. - - -- - .- . - - - - -- _ -
6 -
f ,• - -- r_ i .' j "} t 1 ( 1 t 1 i -
1- T j •- - - ;e-- _ __ `__ - p
1 1 f 1 ' 1 ;"'1 "` I - 1 ` 1 .41.•1.. - t.l:`.t'D ( s= •. 1 ... .• J •i - . 1 ' J , ' V
t - , . f 1 1 1 r 1 1 t ' 1 •` •" ,- ; L - •c'. PQ
tv E +
1 . •. w t i
1 1 1 1 IV ~ t 1
1 1 1 ! t ' ' '. +• - .f .
f-- -.t -!' _ - . t,,•,,,,,..1'`_tl I •:t- ll,ir ,1,•t,,! i 1 t r r, _
Z.. •,
t lJ-- L1_ !'r r 1
f ! 0
1 f 1 - ---'- 1 1 ! 1 i
J
t • ` • • i '
t ' F ! 1 1;,,1 1 ,; t, • t 1 1 t t ' it r ., • Teo+ t 1 t , 3 L.. _:• , ' _ `c.
OA i ' , 2 s _Oak -It
L
r
r = (, 1 •a 1 : l , - • r _ 1 t t t ` 1 1 • 1 - X71 " ,, a ..!.'!. -M' ! .' ...
f j V -i' - f t- f ,• 1 l1 t -
r
t •! 1 t !• t,.;.t ;: •1 f • :1 _ t r t -t L 1 t • t s' „ ,. Z
r T
1 —s_1 1. m _..,. ; t ' i •r m 1 1 i i i 1 .
1 ' _
a a:
I l ti!a; :
Attachment 3
PROPERTY LINE MAP 4
N
I
d
O
1
n
AL
it
O
interchange •,.,, inter an g rm .
sc r L
Rh -
os
o r
O -
xx
Ron
WORIMW
Now
e
4'
B
Attachment 4
Sherwood Cleo
NEIGH30111100D LAND USE PLAN 4
N
ii
Iii
ATTACHMENT 5
See. 36 -153. Use r !
U In a BC Business and Corn_ mercial Distric n the the follow-
ing regulations shall apply:
1) Permitted uses: A building may be erected or used and a lot
may be used or occupied, for any of the following pandnoother.
a ApartmentOptment for one family in connbination with business
use.
b) Hotel, motel, tourist ha room i •l
ng house or boarding-house.
c) Retail store, restaurant ice agen -g ncy, studio, bank,
persona] service and craftsmen's shop, mortua .d) Automobile sales a -ens agency, used car lot, parking garage orlot, provided all facilities are located and all services are
conducted on the lot.
e) Newspaper publishing printing :g) p g establishment,
f) Theater. 3
i
g)_ Hand or automatic self- service laundry. -
h) Bakery or confectionery shop, for thea of ar- •ticles to be sold only at retail on the remisp es.
G) Public garage or motor fuel station; providedthatslicensetooperatesuchbusinessisfirstobtainedfrom
the city council pursuant to cha ter 17 of thisP Code. All =
publie garages and motor fuel stations must be so lo-tsatedonthesiteandthesiteshallbeofthesizeas
provided in section 36 -156 of this division which defines
kinds of operation, site area required' and other data
relating to such business.f ,
J) Any use of the same general character as an of theyabove' permitted uses; provided that .n o use whlCb is
noxious or hazardous shall be permitted.
j2) Special exceptions: The following uses are allowed wlien
authorized by the city council as a special exception:P
a) All uses permitted in R -3 Residence Districts exceptptheconstructionofdwellinghousespermittedindivi-
sions 3 and 4 of this article, R -1 and R -2 Residence
Districts.
nb) Processing and distributing statio for milk or other
beverages, carting or hauling station.
c) Place of amusement, recreation or assembly, than
a theater when conducting indoors.
y it
d) Yard for storage, sale and distribution of ice co fueloilorbuildingmaterials, when enclosed within a fence
of not less than six (6) feet in height, but ng of includingjunkyard, salvage, automobile or other wrecking ard. -g y
f
ATTACHMENT 6
1bSec. 36 -155. BC(M) Corn m ercl -al DiDistrict (Alodified). -
l INTENT. BC H `Business Conrnercial -2itoprovidefortheorderly
dified District is intended -erly transition between more Intens
residential
tenslve Cor.ercialusesandlowormediumdensityentialareas. Restrictions butnotlimitedto, build
of
height, ,
lding entrance
S g , setbacks, orientation, parking lot lotor of bul P 8 location _s r.: be required to ensure tarn atibilituvitiiabuttingresidentialuses. P y
2. USE REGULATIONS. 1 building •lding may be. erected or used andoroccupied, for any of th following '
a lot may be used
purposes, and no other:
a. Retail store; professional a_ dmini strativc officandIoan; es; bank of savin -personal service Graf • gtcraftsmen's shop, mortuary
b. Hotel or motel •
theatrelk
F
d. Job printing shop
e. Bakery or candy shop producin --P S goods for on- premis retail sales.
f- Any use of the same general character as any - of the above permitteduses, as determine b the City-Council P fled
provided that no use %jbiisnoxiousorhazardousshallbe _permitted_
3. The followin uses when eu ' -th °razed by the City Council b mean -use permi y s of a special
a. All uses permitted in R-3 Multiple I? e1 _struction of houses
P 8 bstricts, except the con —permitted n R--1 and R--2 districts '
b. Laundromat or ilar automatic self -- service laund rY
CO Restaurant , where .there _are no drive—up order windows or servn offoodtopatronsintheirau 8automobiles. 1 es _ All cookin .odors must be c ont zol 1soasnottobenoticeabletoadacenjLresidences. • -
d. Place of amusen,ent recreation or assembly, other than a theaterwheretherearenooutd ,oor activities.
II ` lii
E
D. Rezoning: 2300 -10 HazelIwood Avenue
Associate Planner Johnson said thee proposal s to rezone the site to azonconsistentwiththeland -
BC ( M) USe plan. Staff i s recommends n a 6C tozone9
iCharman Axdahl, asked i f the re was anyone present who wished tocommentontherezoning.
Philip James, 2300 Hazelwood Avenue,enue say d he purchased the property asaninvestmentandhethoughtaichangofthesitgnthezonewoulddecreasethe .valuee . He wanted the zoning to remain as is
Glen Mi schke, New Brighton, owner of
sal the property at 2310 Hazelwooddhewoulddprefernottoseethepropertyrezoned.P P y
Commissioner Fischer moved the PlanningCitCouncil Comma ss •on recommend to thearovaloftheresolutionrezonin2300andAvenuefromSCtoBC (M 2310 Hazelwood
Commi Barrett secondednded Ayes- -Commi ssi oners Fischer Barrett,ett,
Nays -- Commissioners AxdahlHeiny. ,Prew, Sletten,
Motion fails,
Commissioner Pr ew moved the Plannn commis •Counci leave the zonin sson recommend •on this ro ert as is the CitBC.
Commi s s i'oner Slettenen seconded Ayes--Co ners Axdahl , Prew Sletten,
Si gmundi k. Nays Fi sc her, Barrett,
MEMORANDUM
dl
Acti by Counci
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development E r .
SUBJECT: Rezoning (BC to R -1)
LOCATION: Coe Avenue German Street and Castle Ave.
APPLICANT: City of Maplewood'
OWNER: Hill crest Development Dat , .A......o.. -
DATE: May 13, 1983
Request
Rezone this site from BC, business commercial to R -1, residence district (single
dwelling)
CONCLUSION
The City Council initiated this rezoning as part of its "downzoni ng" program.
This is where the zoning allows a greater intensity of land use than is proposed
by the Land Use Plan. • Council- speci fi cal l asked that this rezoning be put on
this agenda after rezoning the lot to the south from BC to R -1 on April 25.
Rezoning this site would be consistent with the city's comprehensive plan. The
applicant, however, has applied for a plan amendment from RL, residential lower
density to LSC., limited service commercial for the rezoning area and the land
east of North St. Paul. A hearing is scheduled with the plann -ing commission
for June 20. It would be premature to consider this rezoning until a decision
is made on the plan amendment for the larger area.
Recommendation
Table this rezoning until the plan amendment is considered. -
BACKGROUND
g
Site Description
The area to be rezoned i s 3.6 acres and undeveloped.
Surrounding Land Uses -
Northerly: Highway 36 and Castle Avenue
Easterly: undeveloped, except for the city water tower. Zoned and planned for
single dwellings.
Southerly: undeveloped Cope Avenue and undeveloped land planned and zoned for
single dwellings .
Westerly: undeveloped land zoned and planned for single dwellings
Past Action
1. Land Use Plan designation: RL, residential lower density
2. The RL designation is primarily for a variety of single - dwelling homes.
An occasional double dwelling is allowed.
4.
3. Zoning maps should be updated as necessary to make both land use maps and
zoning maps compatible.
4. Section 36 -485 of city code states that "In any instance where the cityy
counc or the planning commission is required to consider an exception or
change in this chapter, including the zoning map, in accordance with the
provisions of this chapter, the council or planning commission shall, amon
other things:
a. Assure itself that the proposed change is consi with the spirit,
purpose and intent of this chapter.
b. Determine that the proposed change will not substantially injure or
detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of
the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area
included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
c. Determine that the proposed change will serve the best interests and
conveniences of the communi where applicable, and the P ubl i c welfare."
5. Zoning: BC, business commercial
6. The BC zone allows a wide range of commercial uses. (See attachment four.
7. The R -1 zone would limit the use of this site to singl dwPallin 9 s.
2 -
ADMINISTRATIVE
Procedure
I. Planning Commission recommendation
2. _City Council holds a public hearing n •9 d makes a decision. At least fourvotesarerequiredforapproval,
mb
Enclosures:
I.Location Map
Z:Property Line Map
3.Land Use Plan
4.BC Zone
50 Planning Commi Minutes
r y-
ti
3 ..
c
V 0
N >
W
J
KOHL AN AVE. W W KQHLMAN AVE.
ROAD "C" < 23
W h
EDGEHILL RD.
DEMONT AVE. Wii < -F-
j - - 63 C RQOK LAVE .2 • v 3i
cr t
m
w AVE. II th AVE.
SE LN1 AV
6 ERVA I S AV E. -.- -J VAID ERVAI AV
G ANDVIE1rr
36 V IK I D R.CAS E
SHERREN AVE
EROPEE7'
h AYE 0 AV
LARK AVEC LARK AVE. LARK AVE.
L A UR IE R D .R0 = cc LAURIE RD r JI
25 sA = AYE.05
JUN AVE . h "e" Y S Z <
25
ac AVE. }. 8U KE
4
I'
Nr ELDRIDG J AVE . b %- - -
vs • IaawaoD I
pN W E L MON 7
v W vi PUBLIC WORKSQAVE. > SLDG.N
VE v SKILLMA N ID AVE. RIS
RYAN ROS MrQOD AVE.
R Y A N ,
29
v AVE h ~ E- - h RkFROST28
5
N AVE. w IR_ >
su a —
F AVE. a 5
RIPLEY AV ,
o _ 2
W Wakefield
sO PH IA AVE cc t W t
h Lak i ~ 29 I ANE.
s } - _ SOP AVE y s
z - i j o _ = 3
Z J PRfCE =AVE
r Z PRI E A GJ t N
LAI P JL NTEU R.AV
inn11r] 30 —]
ST. PAUL
LOCATION MAP'4
N
I
lot
IVA
IV . ....II-
1316-T' H'
fr
ID
0010
tj
girl
CL
pq
Aw
PROPERTY* LINE MAP
WITH ZONING
U
SherwoodClen' =
NEICN60 .' ,ilOQp LAND USE PLAN
O
lot
move
Net
Um
p
1-
IL!
INsumos
I
DIVISlDID 7. BC BUSINESS AND CM 11 ERCIAL DISTRICT
Attachment .Four -
Sec. 36' Use regulations. .
In a BC Business and Cornrnercial District in the city, the follow-
ing regulations shall apply:
1) Permitted uses. A building may be erected or used, and a lot
may be used or occupied, for any of the following purposes,
and nootl)en _
a) Apirtment for one family in combination uifli'business • _ -
use. - .
t _ (b} Hotel, motel, tourlst home, rooming Muse or boarding - . 40 -- })
Ouse. -
c} Retail store, restaurant, office, agency , studio bari
personal ser%ice and craftsmen's shop, znortuaryp. - -
d) Automobile sales agency, used car lot, parking garage or
lot, provided all facilities are located and all services are
conducted on the lot
Ce} Newspaper publishing, job printing establishment r,
f) Theater. -
g) Hand oT automatic self- ser0ce launAry. - -C•
h) Bakery or confection shop, for the production of ar-
ticles sold only at retail on the premises
G) Public garage or motor fuel station; provided that a
license to operate such business is first obtained from'
the city council pursuant to chapter 17 of this Code_ All
public garages and motor fuel - stations must be so lo- _
ca to d on the site and the site . sh all be of the ies ze as
provided in section 36 - of this divi w h defin -
kinds of ope: at ;on, sitz area requi find o'd,er data
relating tc sued business
j) Any use of the sarne general cbasacter as any of the
above permitted uses; provided that, no use which is
noxious or}ia_zarclous shall be permitted. -
2) Special exceptions: The following uses are allowed when
authorized by the city council as a special exception:
a) All uses permitted in R -3 Residence. Districts, excepP
the construction of dwelling houses permitted in divi-
sions 3 and 4 of this article, R -1 and R -2 Residence
Districts.
b) Processing and distributing station for milk or other '
beverages, carting or hauling station. ,
e) Place of amusement, recreation or assembly, other than
a theater, when conducting indoor.
d) Yard for storage, sale and distribution of ice, coal, fuel
oil or building materials, when enclosed within a fence
of not less than six (6) feet in height, but not including
Junkysajta au .•ard, ge, au or other wrecking yard_
Code 1965, j 907.010; - Ord. No. 232, 3,10 -197; Ord.
No. 256,11- 20 -69; Ord. Igo. 402, § 1, 8- 12 -76)`
I
f
k)
1=
1
G Rezoning--Cope Av n n Street and Castle v - -Avenue, German C t e A enue - , _
Secretary Olson said the proposal is to rezone the site from BC
to R- l
Chairman Prew asked if anyone was present who wished to comment.
Jeff Jarpe, representing Hi 1 l crest Development, said they did not
the rezoning ,:o single family was appropriate for the property because
of the location of the .property (overlooki-ng Highway 36 and the water
tower adjacent to it). He suggested the property adjacent to thei
should be considered for a commercial use. (water tower property)
If the zone change occurs to the property, all hope for development
would be lost. He indicated' if he would have to ask for a change to
the plan to prevent the rezoning, he would do so.
The Commission discussed other appropriate zonings for the property
and land use categories. They also considered just downzoni ng that
portion of the property which l i e s south of Cope Avenue.
Commissioner Whitcomb moved the P1 a -nni ng Commission recommend approval
of a zone chang resolution to rezone the -- property located at the south-
east corner of German and Co a to R -1 as it would be in conformance with
the Land Use Plan and table action on the zone. change for the property
located north of Co Avenue, adjacent' to German Street, for a peri of
6 months to allow the owner to make an a ternati ve proposal or the
property.
Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Prew,
Barrett, Fischer, Si gmundi k, Sletten, Whitcomb
4.
t;
MEMORANDUM
TO:City Manager
FROM:Associate Planner -- Johnson Actlon by Coun
SUBJECT:Preliminary Plat
LOCATION:Larpenteur Avenue, west of Parkwayarkway DriveCANT /OWNER:Woodmark,Inc.ry a..z- -- -...
PROJECT:Bennington Woods ReJ e ..
DATE:April 27, 1983 c,
INTRODUCTION
Request
Preliminary plat approval
Proposal
I. Subdivide the Bennington Woods condominium siteto into twelvethree), to accommodate the phased development '
parcels attachment
ofP the site.
2. Parcels one through eight would each containn a condoms n - um structure of four toeightunits.
3. Parcels nine through twelve would be the rivap to driveways.
4. As each building is constructed the underlyingn •y g parcel would be brought intothecondominium. The developer would retain control of the undevelopedparcelsuntilconstructioniscompleted.
5. An eight -unit structure is presently nder constructionystruct on on proposed lot one.
Comments
The plat is being requested to accommodate the ha i •
problem were
p s ng of the .site. If a markets ngPetodevelop, the developer, rather than the association '
ed ,would maintancontroloftheundeveloppproperty.Once the entire site i s developed, it w i l l beunderthecontrolofthehomeowners' association.
Platting of the site raises the concern that moree than one entity could become respon-or maintaining the driveways, open space and utilities. The homeowners
sible f -
eowners associ -ation bylaws should be drafted to alleviate this concern.
Recommendation
e
Approve the Bennington Woods r •preliminaryiminary plat, subject to the fol l owi nq conditions:
R
1. City attorney approval of -y pp the declaration and bylaws for the condominium. Thesedocumeshallincludelanguagewhich:
a. Will guarantee that only ne homeowners' 'y association will b(i responsible forthemaintenanceofthedrivewaysandothercommonareas .
b. Will require City Council approval of an -P y changes to the bylaws or declarationwhicheffectthemaintenanceofthecommonareasor 'driveways.
2. Lots nine through twelve shall be designated as "unbuildable P arcels" in the
declaration for the condominium homeowners' association document and deeds for
th 4 d . .C i n i v I dual properti es.
3. The final plat shall contain utility asements as directed city engineer.Y by the ci
As a condition of construction of each condominium structure:
1. The footprint for each structure shall be located b landdyn survey prior to the
foundations being poured.
2. Zorner irons shall be set for each lot as a condition of an occupancy permit.P Y P
2
s ..
BACKGROUND
Site Description
1. Site size: 5.76 acres
2. Existing land use: The first phase of the subject development is under construction
Surrounding Land Uses
Northerly: Maple Hills Golf Course- -the proposed site of a future housing developp
ment for older adults.
Southerly: Larpenteur Avenue. South of Lar enteur Avenue and single and doubtp e
dwellings in St. Paul,
Easterly: Maple Hills Golf Course and a single dwelling
Westerly: Mount Zion Cemetery
9 -7 -82: The Community Design Review Board approved the site and building plans
for this development. In December 1982, prior to 'issuing a building permit,
administrative authorization was given to combine -two of the four -unit structures
into an eight -unit structure and to revise the bedroom mix from one and two bed
rooms to - all two - bedroom units. These changes were consistent with all code
requirements.
9-27-82: Council approved a special exception permit (.multiple dwellings in a
business commercial zone) and a parking variance for the subject development.
1- 13 -83: An administration l division was approved to add 27.9 feet to the
northeast boundary of site.
4- 11 -83: Council approved a rezoning from BC, business commercial to R -3, Residence
District (multiple dwelling) for this site and the adjoining Mapl Hills Goff Course.
DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS
P1 anni ng
I. Land Use Plan Designati Rh, High Density Residential
2. Permitted density: 34 peopl per net acre
3. Proposed density: 24.3 people per net acre
4.-i%- R -3, Residence District (multiple dwelling)
50 The plat confoms to all zoni and subdivi requirements.
Public Works"
s
1. Sanitary sewer and water are available.
20 Utility easements are necessary through the plat. Approval of their location
is necessary prior to final pl approval.
3 -
w
mb
Enclosures:
1. 'Location Map '
2.Property Line Map
3.Preliminary Plat
4. =Site Plan
4
I
OWN
CANADA r-n
Sons --
MEkfO IVE,p0wNS
L9
w
I SUw MEM •VE1
1 AVE
Z
w ; C
W 1
W
v *CF L
36 Il c ,
rA U L
t_
J
3
0
w
Pliolen
00 Z' zo
Ciis2
Its 1 io 00 o o :
sell
T , C
psCG3. ac.• t
0 _ RY• 'Tod a t7 -s too j
2• ' % i- 6Z S ..•V_ of ME of S Y4 t0 ....... _... — .
r
S O%C.Ag.et! 1 S1 K line . t • M... c t a;.t•.. - -
co r • }
Lot A -- --3.34 % • - • = 4 .
33 30 "' '
it j p s .: •. 5
e • too
Q
o0E00-/A OG , • ;r - Q 33 3 7
i43.2o
r • t8 • - r _
bi !ow
i ' *
a)' Zra
34 -
5 -jLot
24 KOM
0 5 S 0
T • ~
150 so
a C
139a
r ( f a 1 16 f 10 7 Z!, arc or T 50 -40 p / -5
f
3 3 '^ 20 12 Y 2 '`^ 14 .
to &AC -s 1 34.34 '3 M , 1
Sa _ 1 50j _too__1 278.24 - i ,/_3. A
7. t
S E -
r-Y-
MAPLE HILLS GOLF COURSEt <CLUBHOUSE
02 ...
ice ::: } -; •:• - :•: f
O
OFYMAPLEHILLSLLS I EJFCS t
Lu
Ki .......
LLJ
pw
Xe
tit : ' :;:.: j w•
9
2
1 Y: • .' :•• • :• .• ...::• :.: : '.•: / ..
z . .......•. / :r::::.::::::.:.: SINGLE r
O • : •:. ::.:' • 7t: J:: yJ . :..: ; .•.': :.. ...`.tip -; ; :'. .. •.::;:' _ _ w ` V t. ' 1 Tom+ -
ti. DWELL I N G ' r a 3 q -
ti.:::.. f: }f. }:4. • . RE S I DEN CE
4.
Ai
y ;l on
Xl%
v `.• 3 .O. Z2 jl I ! 30
F es1
J"
tai - ' •
OP
w ,O Q ,
welt _ LARPENTEUR AVE .AZoSoaR622.3b , 4. . s4 ,
J 2 1961 W.N.R. SCALE i ' 200'
00
r
f
PROPERTY LINE NEAP
Attachment 2
Ar
Ar Roo
l
1
I /t i • wra. it #
r/mtr /rare .M/ ! r • a
rrw1 r /
j 1. I/ - I is "• Js 00 .I rlr : JO ttT
r r . . • i -air r ... •. T • rr . i •i w ..r ..
SOS it i+Irwr wrr•r I s a.r • ••wrt• Iry rww iMii
ICI rr •.......r r w•..r ...r+.. t•:
look or-
to FM Cowrie Mtw•nr•aftwo r /IrA lAlr •'
ysN••••••
r s t t • lf • Mtr. ..r I I s avowImew7d4f~ u arNw sNt • a s V,E'NuEoftnTJN6aas Z A RPlwTEVR ,••• or raw s1 ! '' . n. R , arks « VAR a .
s. #4w A C. rte 1 •«. is a N
t ,
f
ii
fi
l.
j
Attachment 3 -
PRELIMINARY PLAT -
f
t
a
t t•.1. N
1
I
At
i .a•r.rw ••olpftorr
M.t•IRts
ir M 1 Nt.•I
h >f
i
tL• MAI M
I
IL
tm
1 L•a,r HlLM
1
a L 0 C
er
V 1Mit
r y w •
f l oof
Kw
AIL
1
I /t i • wra. it #
r/mtr /rare .M/ ! r • a
rrw1 r /
j 1. I/ - I is "• Js 00 .I rlr : JO ttT
r r . . • i -air r ... •. T • rr . i •i w ..r ..
SOS it i+Irwr wrr•r I s a.r • ••wrt• Iry rww iMii
ICI rr •.......r r w•..r ...r+.. t•:
look or-
to FM Cowrie Mtw•nr•aftwo r /IrA lAlr •'
ysN••••••
r s t t • lf • Mtr. ..r I I s avowImew7d4f~ u arNw sNt • a s V,E'NuEoftnTJN6aas Z A RPlwTEVR ,••• or raw s1 ! '' . n. R , arks « VAR a .
s. #4w A C. rte 1 •«. is a N
t ,
f
ii
fi
l.
j
Attachment 3 -
PRELIMINARY PLAT -
f
t
t t•.1. N
M.t•IRts
1
tL• MAI M
1
I /t i • wra. it #
r/mtr /rare .M/ ! r • a
rrw1 r /
j 1. I/ - I is "• Js 00 .I rlr : JO ttT
r r . . • i -air r ... •. T • rr . i •i w ..r ..
SOS it i+Irwr wrr•r I s a.r • ••wrt• Iry rww iMii
ICI rr •.......r r w•..r ...r+.. t•:
look or-
to FM Cowrie Mtw•nr•aftwo r /IrA lAlr •'
ysN••••••
r s t t • lf • Mtr. ..r I I s avowImew7d4f~ u arNw sNt • a s V,E'NuEoftnTJN6aas Z A RPlwTEVR ,••• or raw s1 ! '' . n. R , arks « VAR a .
s. #4w A C. rte 1 •«. is a N
t ,
f
ii
fi
l.
j
Attachment 3 -
PRELIMINARY PLAT -
f
t
Aq, MP
WIN
7K ,.
f a ,. ii17
Ut
y
sue. +
XS rt. •'L .,§. ! A : -; I
ka
e-"x
lT64
kL
m IL W 'ja Ice -q -
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Maner
Actlon by Coc±r
FROM: Associate Planner.-Johnson , dSUBJECT: Variances--Lot Area, Frontage and Width P„r; 4 -PLOCATION: Dieter Street, North of Frost Avenu `,`"`!°°
APPLICANT: Harlan Moe = Reiect
OWNER: Gordon Hedlund (contract owner) t--- --
State of Minnesota (fee owner)
DATE: April 27, 1983
SUMMARY
Request
Approval of lot area, lot frontage and lot width variances to construct a
single dwel 1 i ng on an existing forty foot wide interior lot, 5000 square feetinarea.
Comments
Council denied a similar request (Terry O'Leary) in May 1982 for a lot north
of Ryan Avenue on Barclay Street. (See Past Actions.) The present lot area
variance would be 400 square feet greater than that denied for the O'Learyrequest. Council also denied a similar request in 1973 for Marcella Tracy.
This request should also be denied for the following reasons:
Out-of-character existing development
Construction of a home on this parcel would be - out -of -cahar 'cter with exist
ing neighborhood development. The smallest built -upon P arcel on the block
is at least 80 feet wide, twice the width of the subject lot (attachmentthree) .
Excessive neighborhood density
The present neighborhood density is 18.3 people /net acre (p/na), exc eedin 9the14p /na prescribed by the Land Use Plan. Approval of this reque would
set a precedent for the development of three nearby forty foot lots in
addition to the applicant's lot, With the one remaining standard-sized
property, a possible future density in this neighborhood could be 19.1 p /na --substantially greater than planned for.
L . ck of hardship unique to the ro ert
A'hy hardship sustained b the •r P y applicant or owner would be self - imposed. This
tax - forfeit property was purchased from the County in February::`1982 prior _toreceiofnecessaryzoningapprovals. The Ramsey County Land:. Commissioner's
office routinely advi perspective buyers to seek such a rc'ls. Persons
who purchase tax
PP `
p property for development must do so air their own risk.
Within the upcoming year', the Housing and RedevelopmentPt Authors ty will beBevelopingaplantofacilitatethetransferofownershipfsubstandard,parcels, where P ndard,tax - forfeited P ere possible, to adjoining property owners.
Recommendation •
Approve the enclosed resolution (attachment on e) , denying the re larea, width and area variances. _
DeDial is on the basis that:
10 _ Develop of this lot w -P would be inconsistent with the intent of the zonincode, resulting in a dwelling out - of - character with existing nee ghborhooddevelopment.
2. Approval would be inconsistent with the revious denials 'P i s of similarm 1 ar requests .
3. Neighborhood density would further exceed the allowable maximum.
4. Strict enforcement would not cause an undue hardship unique to the individuallotinquestion.
5. The present owner purchased this tax - forfeited propert 'p p ty i n 1982. The requirementsfromwhichavarianceisrequiredhavebeenineffectsince 'hardshipshi i
e t he 1960 :s .Any p ncurred would be self-imposed,
x
f
M
2
BACKGROUND
Planning •
Lot size 40 x 125 feet, with 5000 square feet of area
Existing land use: Undeveloped, grown up with trees
Ownership: The parcel is in separate ownership from adjacent arcel s.J P
Surrounding Land Uses
North: Single dwelling on a 120 foot wide parcel
East: Dieter Street. Across the street, singlee dwel l i n s on 100 to 120 foot99of
wide lots
South: Single dwelling on an 80 foot wide lot
West: Single dwellings on 80 foot wide lots
Past Actions
8-16-73: Council denied lot area and width variances for a forty -foot wide
lot, owned by Marcella Tracy, located on Gurney Street, north of Larpenteur
Avenue on the basis that:
1. "the variances are. so extreme as to not to practically allow the construction
of a home on the site in accordance with Village Code -and in conformance
with the housing in the neighborhood,
2. the property was acquired after the 75 -foot requirementfrontaga for
b u i l d i n g was established and also because of the drainage problem as it
relates to the alley."
5 -6 -82: Council denied l area, width and frontag variances to develop a fort9PYfootlotdescribedasLot9, Block 27, Gladstone Plat 2 (Barclay Street, north
of Ryan Avenue) on the basis that:
1. Development of this lot would be inconsistent with the intent of the zoning
code, resul in a dwelling out -of. character with existing ne
development.
2. Approval would be inconsistent with the previous denial of a similar request.
3. Neighborhood density would further exceed the allowable maximum.
n
r
4. " 15tri ct enforcement would not cause an undue hardship uniue to the individual
f1 of in question,
5. The best use of the property,-in the public interest, would ! combination
with the parcel to the south to create a proper -sized corner. t and to sustain
adequate separation between dwellings. -
3
6. The present owners purchased this property in 1982. The requirements from
which a variance is requested have been in effect since the 1960's. An
hardship incurred would be self - imposed.
7. 'The property i s maintained by an adjacent property owner and is not an
eyesore.
DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS
Plaffning
1. Land Use Plan designation: RL, residential lower density
2. Zoning: R -1, residence district (single dwelling)
3. Permitted density: 14 persons /net acre
4. Existing density (attachment two - -b1 ocks 25-27, 30 -32 and 34 -36, Gladstone
Plat 2).: 18.3 persons /net acre
5. Proposed density (area in item four) : 18.5 persons /net acre
6. Compliance with Land Use laws:
a, Statutory!
Section 462.357 of State Statutes states that "variances from the
literal provisions of the Zoning code can be granted if:
1) Strict enforcement would cause undue hardshi p because of circum-
stances unique to the individual property under consideration
Undue hardship' means the.property in question cannot be put to
a reasonable use if used under conditi allowed by the official
controls, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances
unique to his property not created by the landowner, and the
variance, i f granted, will not alter the essential character of
the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute
an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under
the terms of the ordinance.
2) When it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with
the spirit and intent of the ordinance."
b. Ordinance:
1) Sections 36 -69 and 30- 8(f)(1) state that a single dwelling lot must
r
be no less than 10,000 square feet in area.
variance 1 .
rM
This parcel contains 5,000 square feet requi a 1 t.area
variance of 5000 square feet. -
4
2) .Sections 36 -69 and 30- 8(f)(1) state that a single dwelling
lot must be no less than 75 feet wide at the building setback
line.
This parcel is 40 feet wide, requiring a lot width variance
of 35 feet. =
3) Section 30-8(f)(1) states that a rectangular singlee dwel l i n9 9
lot must have at least 60 feet of frontage.
11n , W%^^ ")
This parcel is 40 feet wide, requiring a lot frontage variance
of 20 feet.
Public Works
Sewer and water are available.
Financial
At the time of forfeiture, there was an unpaid assessment in the amount of
263.94. The County paid $177.59 from the 1982 proceeds from the ro ertpp y
Provided the present contract holder continues to pay for the property, the
County will continue to pay this assessment. If Council approves this request,
a condition of approval should be the payment of the unpaid assessment plus
interest.
Ramsey County Land Commissioner
This property went tax - forfeit on July 29, 1969. Maplewood authorized its
sale on August 19, 19710 , The applicant purchased it on February 12, 1982 for
2900 ($377 paid to date, .the remainder due over a ten -year period). Mr. Eaves
of the Land Commissioner's office indicates that their policy is to suggest
that. perspective buyers check with the individual cities for any zoning or
building limitations before purchase.
Environmental Health
In November 1979, the City received a complaint about, assorted junk on this.
property. A letter was sent to neighborhood property owners, particularly
those with children who played on the lot, informing them that the nei ghbor-
hood .must take responsibility for keeping the lot clean. Since that time,
no complaints have been received. The lot presently is clean and grown up in
trews. The grassy areas appear to be maintained by the adjacent property owners.
W'
Enclosures. -
1. Resolution
2. Location Map
3. Property Line Map
4, Applicant's Letter of Justification
5. Letter from the City Attorney
5
Attachment One
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council
Chambers in said City on the day of at 7:00 p.m.
The following members were present:
f
The. fol 1 owi ng members were absent:
WHEREAS, a lot area, width and frontage variance request has been initiated
by Harlan Moe to construct a single dwelling on a 40 x 125 foot lot described
as follows:
Lot 21, Block 31, Gladstone Plat 2, Section 15, Township 29, Range 22
WHEREAS, the procedural history of - this - variance request is as 'fol l ows :
1. That a variance. request has been initiated by Harlan Moe, pursuant
to Chapters 30 and 36.of the Maplewood Code and Section 462.357(g)
of State Statute;
2. That said variance request was referred to and reviewed by the
Maplewood City Planning Commission on the day of ,
1983, at which time said Planning Commission recommended to the
City Council that said variance be denied;
3. That the Maplewood City Council held . a public hearing to consider
the variance request, notice *'thereof having been published and
mailed pursuant to law; and
4. That all persons present at said hearing were i ven an opit9PPY
to be heard and /or present written statements, and the Council
considered reports and recommendati of the City Staff and
Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL of THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD,
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA that the above-described variance be denied on the
basis of the followi findings of fact: .
1. Development of this lot would be inconsistent with the intent of the
zoning code, resulting in a dwelling out -of- character with existing
neighborhood development.
2. Approval would be inconsistent with the previous denials of similar
requests. :mot
3. Neighborhood density would further exceed the al l ow4U' maximum.
4. Strict enforcement would not cause an undue hardshi p quni ue to the
individual lot in. question.
5. The present owner punccased this tax - forfeited ro ert i
u' P P y n 1982. Therequirementsirementsfromwhichchavarianceisrequiredhavebeenineffectsincethe1960's. Any hardship incurred would be self-imposed.
Adopted thi s day of 19830 _
Seconded by Ayes -- =
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY Ss.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
1, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and aappointed ClerkofMPPk of the.City p wood, Mi nnesota , do hereby certify that I have carefully comparedtheattachedandforegextractof
y P
9 9 minutes of a regular meeting of the .City of Maplewood, held on the day of 1983 'with the origonfileinmyofficeandthesameisafull, true and complete transcri ttherefrominsofarasthesamPerelatesto
Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporateporate seal of the Cit thisdayof1983.
City Clerk
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
r
4W%
r y
MOWN
Jan
00e
ogre
KOHLMAN 4AVE
ac
ROAD
IF
e
GERVAIIS
U
It
AV E.
ROOK AVE
SEX wT
6 VAN.DVI 11;VD1[YIKiNr, I R.
RADAT
C=
Or
ki XONLMAN AVE.A
EDGEMLL NO.
65
11 th AVE.
dkV
AVL
LlrLF-n36
C !OP1E.
A
LARK AVE.
25
CQvNTY F
IhLELAW 1 2501IRn,
0 JUNCTION AVE
U RKE
AV
40
ELDRIDG
AK W ELMON1
LS KILL MA
14, K
o ft - A
I
R. R. q
49
28 FR v 40 AVE w 28 i?j
Uj
N AVE. t W r
t l 'a,
62
0 FRISSIE AVE.
F Wakefield
PH IA ASE
Loll e
OP 4. E
PRI
62
A P 1q,
0 FIF1 FIF] I @
ST. PAUL -
SHERREN AVE R EN AVE.FIF: AVE P E AVE.
LARK LARK AVE. ' ;
ILAURIE _JLRD. ILAURIE1 no X
SAhM Z. [AVE.@64 Z •• `S
ir
AVE. ;IF 11 Su K E Al
1-;
c
0)
z NT1IDEMO Im. AVEI
1
1 29
J PRICE z AVE
x
cc
nFIH I
t
Z,
zrAN
AVE*
Attachment 3
0 ) ?C
t p ,
O 4
p
AV E.-
I Dc, Ve
1 46
z Cr At
ap V
c rj C .1 t t1 .. ap c
i 155 3 a i
4L/
2 '- - - soe') 1 G ,
i .• 'LJ
V {
C i 1 7r s^ 'J 3ti
F-R
ii. i• [
4 • If
w A
LU S rz
Id jf
A .
4T 7P
1 . :_
LLJ
avow
Ale
J
u
E
CO
PROPERTY LINE MAP
pther developable
forty Votentiallyootlots
zt
s r
1
I
23 J
iC y N
w
t A ..z Y
II
r-
ci
s •j J
Z5
t
at
6wj _ 73i
zrAN
AVE*
Attachment 3
0 ) ?C
t p ,
O 4
p
AV E.-
I Dc, Ve
1 46
z Cr At
ap V
c rj C .1 t t1 .. ap c
i 155 3 a i
4L/
2 '- - - soe') 1 G ,
i .• 'LJ
V {
C i 1 7r s^ 'J 3ti
F-R
ii. i• [
4 • If
w A
LU S rz
Id jf
A .
4T 7P
1 . :_
LLJ
avow
Ale
J
u
E
CO
PROPERTY LINE MAP
pther developable
forty Votentiallyootlots
CD
Attachment 4
t9- tv
0000
Qu zRigio A).*I
Joe
0MM1%
IL
e
041t
4045
V AJ f Fol 0 Aj
4f
40r
00 ,
4C- A)
A1V=r46OW
low
4
46 Jo
40L_040le
7j7k 7
4b J04
L;WIAE
4Z
APO-.
try,
4 L
41
P
e,7
Tr,W,
r A , 410
Attachment .5
LAIS, BANNIGAN 8c Cl R ES1 P. A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
402 FIRST FEDERAL. 13UILDING
bvbt AND C[DAft
SAINT PAUL.. MINNESOTA 55101
v.'i •• cl 2 ,"ter.,,
o
DONALD L LAtS do .
JOHN F. @ANNIGAN. JEL To *' AREA CODE 612
224-3781JEROMED. CIRESI ` a
CI eft
Fin. u
March 19, 1974 Con. Now
r ,-.
w •.-v•
Pub. i r1 . _
r :Ab. 17 c '?'•1. s
1a 4 r• 3s
Mayor and City Council - rL , s
City of Maplewood 0 r
s 1380 Frost Avenue ° Da ._.,.3 OZ
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
ATTENTION Michael G. Miller
RE: Marcella Tracy vs. Village of Maplewood
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers :
On August 16, 1973, Marcella Tracy appeared before the Villagelage
Council sitting as its Board of Adjustments and Appeals to
consider her Petition for a variance from the minimum lot
area and lot width requirements of the Village code. Mrs.
Tracy owned a 40 foot wide lot which was platted as such riorp
to the effective date of the City zoning code.
The City Council, sitting • as the Board of Adjustments and Appealspps
denied the application for minimum wi dthdth and area requirement s
Mrs. Tracy initiated legal action seeking a aeclara for jinR
y
Ramsey County District Court. At the trial of the matter
the Ramsey CounIly District Court intimated that if t1n matter could
not be disposed of, he would most 1 ikel find that Mrs. Trac s
husband had j2urchased an unbuildable. lot but inasmuch as it
was an unbuildable lot, that two assessments for ' s we er and
water were therefore improperly assessed. Rather than g o to
trial, the judge asked that we attempt to negotiate a settlPgsement
whereby the court would find that the council action. was not0
uireasonable, arbitrary or capricious but that the lot was, in
N -00own- f unbuildable. and therefore not benefited b = ofthetwoglare -
mentioned - assessments. Rather than go through 1 e Jud
proceedings to arrive at - this end, • the . enders igne ndicated
that he would recommend such a disposition to the City Counc
Mayor and City Council
of Maplewood
March 19, 1974
Page 2
Consider this letter as my recommendation that'. the CityCouncilfindthatLot28, Block 12, St. Aubin & Dion' s Rice
Street Addition to the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, was
improperly assessed and that the principal plusPp interest be
remitted,
As an additional aside an abu 'ttlfig owner, James Commander,will purchase the lot and incor orate it 'p in his homestead.
Respectf y u ml t ted,
i
J
J
l 111
1
ohn Fe Bannigan, Jr.
JFB : j mw
e
E. Variances: Dieter Street (Moe)
Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting approval of lot
area, lot frontage and lot width variances to construct a sip 1 e dwellinginggona40footlot. Staff is recommending denial,
Harlan Moe, said he was concerned that the City would d 'y de th requestbecausehedidshowaplantotheneighborhoodandthedidnotthinkity
was out of character with the neighborhood. He thought there had been
sufficient changes in the present for the City to change their regulationstopermitconstruction . on the smaller lots.
The .Commission asked if there was anything Maplewood could do to
prevent the sale of a smaller lot through tax forfeiture.
Secretary Olson said the City would have to have a P ubl i c need for
the property.
s
The Commi_ssi on indicated they did not wish to establish a recedep ntbyapprovingavarianceona5,000 square foot lot,
Commissioner Pel l i sh moved the Planning Commission recommend the CiCoun1approve _ the :resolution denying the requested lot area width and
area variances on the basis:
I. Development of this lot would be i nconsi ste 'nt w th the intent of the
zoning code, resulting in a dwelling out -of- character with existingneighborhooddevelopment,
2. Approval would be i ncons i s tent with the r ' °p evous denials of similar
requests.
3. Neighborhood densi ty'iwoul d further exceed the allowable maximum.
4. Strict enforcement would not cause an undue hardship uniqueuepq to theindividual1ofinquestion. ,
5. The present owner purchased this tax - forfeited ro ert 'P P y n 1982.. The
requirements from which a variance is required have been in effect
since the 1960's. Any hardship incurred would be self-imposed,
Opmmi ssioner Whitcomb seconded A es--CommissionersioyHers Axdahl ,Barrett, Ellefson, Fischer, Heny; Pel1ish, Prew Si mend' 'g k, Whitcomb
r
y.
s
C*--/
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Public Works Coordinator
SUBJECT: Award of Bids
DATE: May 16, 1983
Action by Co -,,n 1:
Endorse
Mod- -l-
sRed e c `e d
Da e
On Tuesday, May 10, at 10:00 a.m. bids were received for the
purchase of three (3) half ton pick -up trucks. A copy of the
tabulation of bids is attached.
The low bid of $24,866.22 compares favorably with the $27,000.00
budgeted for this equipment.
Award to the low bidder is recommended.
RESOLUTION FOR AWARD OF BIDS
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA,
that the bid of Merit Chevrolet in the amount of $24,866.22 is
the lowest responsible bid for the furnishing of three (3) half
ton pick -up trucks, and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized
and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on
behalf of the City.
TABULATION OF BIDS
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the
officials designated for a bid opening by the City Council of
Maplewood was convened at 10:00 a. m., C.D.S.T. ,Tuesday, May ,
1O, 1983 . The purpose of this meeting was to receive, open and
publicly read aloud bids for three ( 3 ) half ton pick -up trucks,
Present were: W. Cass and J. Embertson
Following the reading of the notice of advertisement for bids,
the following b ids were opened and read:
BIDDER
Merit Chevrolet
Thane Hawkins Chevrolet
BID AMOUNT
24,866.22
26,397.
All bids were accompanied by a bond or certified check in the
amount of 5% of the bid.
Pursuant to prior instruction of the Council, the City Clerk
referred the bids received to the City Engineer _instructing him
to tabulate same and report with his recommendation at the
regular City Council meeting of May 23, 19839
Meeting adjourned at 10:10 a.m.
fi .
MEMORANDUM
T0: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Frost Avenue Reconstruction
Birmingham St. to White Bear Avenue
Project No. 82 -9
DATE: May 13, 1983
Ac i-lors by
The Ramsey County Department of Public Works received and opened construction
bids on May 11, 1983. The bidders and bid amounts are as follows:
Ranking Bidder Bid Amount
1 Forest Lake Contracting $847,188.86
Z PCI Construction, Inc. 850
3 Arcon Construction Co., Inc. 860
4 Palda and Sons, Inc. 867
5 Shafer Construction Co., Inc. 868, 371.30
6 Total Asphalt Construction Co. 888
7 Alexander Construction Co., Inc. 939
The estimated project cost based on Forest Lake Contracting ` s bid is within
3.5/ of the amount presented at the public hearing.
We, therefore, recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution of con-
currence for award of contract.
mb
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has entered into an agreementwithRamseyCountyforthereconstructionofFrostAvenuefrom
Birmingham Street to White Bear Avenue, Project No. 82 -9, S.A.P.
62- 628 -03; and
WHEREAS, the County will perform the engineering and admi ni s-
strati ve management of the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,that the bid of Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. in the amount of
847,188.86 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of
Project 82 -9 -S . A. P . 62- 628 -03 and the City of Maplewood concurs with
Ramsey County's award of bid.
r
MEMORANDUM
T0: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
RE: Ordinance to Abolish Insurance Committee (2nd Reading)
DATE: May 13, 1983
H 011 (
47
On May 12th the Council approved the first reading of the attached
ordinance. Background information regarding this matter is in the
attached memorandum.
It is recommended that the Council approve the second reading of
this ordinance.
DFF:1 nb
Exhibit D
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTIONF OF
THE MAPLEWOOD CODE RELATING TO THE INSURANCE COMMITTEE
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. This ordinance does hereby repeal Sections 2 -96
through2 -101 of the Maplewood Code.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force
from and after its passage and publication.
Passed by the City Council
of the City of Maplewood
this day of 91983
Mayor
Attest:
Clerk
Ayes -
Nays -
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
RE: Ordinance to Abolish Insurance Committee (1st Reading)
DATE: May 2, 1983
14e- C y
PROPOSAL
It is proposed to have first reading of the attached ordinance to abolish the
Insurance Committee to avoid potential violation of antitrust laws.
BACKGROUND
The Insurance Committee was formed several years ago to eliminate the procedures
wherein one agent was regularly awarded the City's insurance coverages without
competition. Annually, the Insurance Committee obtains quotations on the City's
insurance coverages (except for employee group insurance) and prepares a recom-
mendation to the City regarding placement of insurance. Present members of the
Committee are Jerry Ekbl ad, B i l l Howard,. Irving Anderson, Ed Maranda, John
Winter and Dick Pearson. More details regarding the Committee are in the
attached excerpts from the Maplewood Code (Exhibit A) .
In November, 1982, I was contacted by a reoresentative of a professional risk
management firm regarding the management of the City's insurance program. This
representative suggested I check the legality of the City's Insurance Committee
and mailed to me a copy of an agreement between the Attorney General and insur-
ance agents for the City of Virginia, Minnesota. On November 4th, I mailed
this agreement to the City Attorney and requested a written opinion on the
legality of the City's Insurance Committee.
In January, I received a publication on the application of antitrust laws to
insurance purchases. This publication dealt extensively with alternative insur-
ance purchasing procedures (including the use of insurance com. ittees) and cited
legal opinions regarding antitrust laws in relation to insurance purchasing.
This publication was referred to the City Attorney and a copy is attached
Exhibit B).
On April 27th, the City Attorney issued a legal opinion "that the City should
abandon its present ordinance and method of obtaining insurance and resort to a
method which w i l l not be in violation of the antitrust laws." A copy of thi s
opinion is attached (Exhibit C ).
On April 28th, the City Attorney and I attended a meeting of the Insurance Com-
mittee. The Committee members were presented a copy of the City Attorney's
legal opinion and a long discussion ensued. The following is a summary of the
items discussed:
TO: City Manager
May 2, 1983
Page 2
1. A recommendation would be made to the City Council at its May 9th meetingtohavefirstreadingofanordinancethatwouldabolishtheInsurance
Committee.
2. Members of the Insurance Committee volunteered to assist the City in the
preparation of specifications for proposals on insurance coverages that
expire July 1, 19930
3. The specifications will be drafted in a manner to allow the greatest possiblenumberofquotations.
4. The specifications will be reviewed, typed and duplicated by the Cit, no
later than May 15,
5. The City will publish ads in the Maplewood Review and St. Paul Dispatch
requesting insurance quotations. .
6. Insurance quotations will be due by mid -June and they will be evaluated by
the City with assistance from members of the Insurance Committee that did not
submit quotations.
7. A recommendation will be made to the City Council at its June 27th meeting
regarding placement of insurance coverages effective July 1st.
8. Items that must be considered regarding an ordinance for a new Insurance
Committee are elimination of the residency requirement, requirement that
insurance specifications drafted by the Committee be drawn to promote
competition, Committee members that evaluate Quotations cannot submit a
quotation, and insurance commissions must not be split among committee members.
When the meeting adjourned, it was decided that future meetings would be on an
informal basis until a new ordinance is drafted to reform the Insurance Committee.
The only viable alternative to an Insurance Committee in the future would be the
use of a professional risk management firm to detemine necessary insurance
coverages, draft specifications and evaluate quotations. At least three metro-
politan area cities have recently hired a professional risk management firm.
These cities are Burnsville, Eden Prairie and Bloomington. It would cost approx-
imately. $2,400 if we were to hire a professional risk management firm.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the attached ordinance ,(Exhibit D) be approved for first
reading.
DFF:1nb
MEMORANDUM _4a
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT/OWNER:
PR04ECT:
DATr
w .
Action by Co.oi1:City Manager
Director of Community Development Endo.lr
Planned Unit Development Rev i s i -onpGtf ? £u ..Maryland Avenue and Ferndale Street =`Ro i eCastlaDesignandDevelopmentCo., Inc.
Beaver Creek Condominium Homes D
May 12, 1983
SUMMARY
Request
The applicant is requesting a revision to the 1973 lanned unit developmentP
approval to relocate the 110 units approved for the north part of the sitetothesouthpart.
Project Description
1. 340 condominium units with 340 garage spaces and 340 open spaces.P
2. Each unit would be sold separately.
3. Elevation and site plan are enclosed.
4. The open space to the north would be left undeveloped.
5. Each building is 2 -1/2 stories high in the front and '9 three stores n the
rear.
6. There are seventeen . bu i 1 d i ngs with twenty units in each building.
7. All interior streets, drives and open space would mapp1beownedand
by a homeowners association.
8. There would be seven one - bedroom and thirteen two - bedroom units in each
building.
9. A swimming pool and tennis court are proposed.
10 fifer to the applicant's letter attachment four).
Reasdn for the Request -
f
1. Condition eleven of the Maple Greens PUD requires that "PriorPr' rq o grantingthefinaltenoccupancypermiinthefirststage , the developer shall
propose the succeeding stages of development to the village council for
review and determination of the avai l abi 1 i t and adeq of deliver ofYqyy
necessary support services.
2. Condition one requires that "any changes in the adopted plan shall requireapublichearingandapprovalbh
q
9 pp y the vi council."
Comments •
Relocating the previously approved 110 units from the north art of the siteP to tothe. south has several advantages to the city:
l . Maryl ake Road would not have to be constructed as a publicc its rovemenP t
proj
20 =The northerly bu i 1 d i n site ad 'acent • 9 to "Jim'ss P ra r e would reman open
space and may be desirable to be acquired as a park.
3. It would be difficult to get sanitary sewer to the northerly 'y heriy ports on of thesite.
The disadvantage is that there wi be more density and traffic on Maryland Avenuethanwasapprovedinthe1973PUD. The overall s i Le density is still less thanallowedunderthecitylanduseplaThelanduseplanwouldallow716units.This proposal is fur only 340 units.
Approval of the enclosed resolution amending condition one of the 1973 P UD.
0
S
2
BACKGROUND
Site Description
Acreage of the site (north of Maryland Avenue): 69 acres
Existing land use: undeveloped
Surrounding Land Uses
Northerly: city owned land used as a nature area called "Jim's Prairie."
Easterly: quads along Ferndale Street and a proposed mobile home park to the
north of the quads.
Southerly: Maryland Avenue. Quads -are being constructed south of Maryland Avenue
Westerly: Beaver Lake Mobile Home Park
Past Actions
7- 26 -73: Council approved a planned unit development, which included the
applicant's site, subject to the following:
1. The attached site plan (see attachment three) indicating land uses, densities
and street patterns shall be the village approved plan of development for
the entire development, and any changes in the adopted plan shall require
a public hearing and approval by the Village Council,
2. The development of the special use permit area shall be staged to allow
development only of that portion designated RL and lying south of Maryland
Avenue west of Ferndale Street and north of Magnolia Avenue, except as
provided in condition No. 3, and such development shall only e allowed byy
official subdivision platting in accordance with the village platting code.
3. Development of additional stages shall not be permitted until the village
council is completely satisfied that all necessary support services are
avai 1 abl a or guaranteed to adequately service such additional staged areas
within the special use permit property, while at the same time not over-
loading or jeopardizing the service delivery capability or performance to
any existing surrounding developments or properties.
4. All structures proposed in the PUD special use permit shall be reviewed
through the Community Design Review Board Ordinance provisions to achieve
an aesthetically and visually pleasant appearance and landscaped develop-
ment, and the developer shall provide, at a minimum, in RL areas, an entire
street throughout its length with structural and landscaping plans that
a w.comprehensi v design review can be performed by the village.
u
3
5. The proposed open space within the entire development and within each stage
shall be clearly delineated and clarified in a legal document which outlines
the development of the open space, its maintenance and citizen or resident
rights to' that open space, and such clarification shall be reviewed as
part of the subdivision - platting requirement and approved prior to any
building permit or ancillary development permit such as grading.
6. The developer shall provide an escrowed amount equal to the estimated cost..
of the Ferndale Avenue feasibility study; said amount shall be- used to
for said study if said project is not undertaken and assaised. In
other words, if the project does not go through, and there is not a pro j ect ,
add the cost of the feasibility study onto the developer it will be paid
out of an escrowed .amount. If the project should go through, and ' i t is to
be assessed, then the escrowed amount will be returned to the developer.
The developer would guarantee it from the beginning.)
7. No building or ancillary development permit shall be issued unless and until
the improvement of Ferndale Avenue has been ordered by the village council and
no occupancy permit shall be issued within the first stage until such street
is improved to village minimum street standards.
8. Any increased surface drainage resulting from the proposed development shall
not discharge run -off anywhere from the site at any greater rate or volume
than was the case resulting from its undeveloped state, and should such not be
possible, the development shall be responsible to secure all necessary ff-y
site legal rights for increased drainage discharge and /or storage and further
bear all required related development costs to accommodate such run -off, and
prior to any b u i l d i n g permits of any kind being issued a drainage plan shall
be submitted and approved by the village engineer prior to any permit issuance.
9. All utilities installed within the confines of the special use permit shall -
be installed underground.
10. The first stage shall -commence physical construction within 12 months from
the date of village council approval.
11. Prior to granting the final ten occupancy permits in the first stage the
developer shall propose the succeeding stages of development to the village
council for review and determination of the availability and adequacy of
delivery of necessary support services.
12. All residential Jewel l i ng units shall be subject to the neighborhood park
acquisition and development charge policy of the in effect at the
time of the issuance of building permits.
13. The developer shall provide financial assurance to the village guaranteeinggg
his faithful performance of completing each stage approved and such assurance
shall be the equi val ent of five percent of each stage's completed construction
valuation, and the developer shall provide evidence from a financial
i-nsti tuts on - i ndi cats ng that sufficient monies are assured to develop each
stage approved by the village council and such financial assurances shall
be performed and submitted to the v i l l a g e prior to a PP 1 i cati _for theP
first building permit of each stage.
4
14 ..The village reserves the right to impose additional conditions on each
stage of development when such particulars are presented.
15. The applicant and owner shall agree to the above conditions in writing.
5 -9 -83: Council referred the current application to staff to have a resolution
and findings of fact prepared.
Planning
1 awLand use plan designation: RM, residential medium density and OS, open space
26 "The RM classification is designated for such housing types as single dwellings
on small lots, double dwellings, town houses and mobile homes. The maximum
population density is 22 people /net acre. The number of units for each
acre would vary by dwelling type and bedroom mix. As an example, a two
and three bedroom town house project with private roads would be allowed
a maximum density of six units- for each acre. A similar apartment project
would be allowed 7.5 units for each acre.
3. Zoning: F, farm residence
Environmental
Except for three knolls with relatively higher ground, most of this site is
classified as a wet meadow wetland. The soil is usually without standing water,
but is waterlogged within a few inches of the surface. Standing water is
apparent in the spring.
Public Works
Water
The water distribution system in this service area is presently incomplete
The supply and pressure required for fire fighting purposes is not adequate.
The city, however., has approved several other developments in this area,
including Pearson's mobile home park; Sam Cave's quads and the quads and
dwellings south of Maryland Avenue. The third and fourth phases should . be
conditioned on the city council ordering a feasibility study for the McKnight
Road water main.
Domestic water supply also has some limitations i n pressure for higher
elevations in this area. The Beaver Creek project is at a lower elevation
and should be adequate.
The water pressure problems in this area were considered in 1981, but water
improvements were postponed believing that McKnight Road would be constructed
i n a timely manner. There is a substantial cost savings to be realized if
the water. improvements are constructed in conjunction with McKnight Road.
However, no firm schedule is available for McKnight Road. The water system
z improvements must be considered immediately for this area, regardless - of any
additional development. A f e a s i b i l i ty study should be prepafiOd investigating
the 16 -inch water main along McKnight Road and the elevated s rage required
for this area.
5
Sanitary Sewera _
Sanitary sewer is available and presently s addevelomeet.
y equate for the proposedp • It should be noted, however, that at ultimate developmentservicedistrictthere oftheewillbeacapacityStaffismonitoringthisconditionandwillbringittothecouncil'stheflownears
c 1 s attent on whencapacity.
The sanitary sewer also has some bearing on the -vel o ment. 'elevation
e s to layout for the proposeddepDuetotheelevationofthesanitaryseweritwdifficulttoservey• pld bethenorthernportionofthesubjectroertTsomeextentexplainsainsthecon
P P . ' h s toPconcentrationofunitsproposedonthesouthernendoftheparcel,
Storm Drainage
This site is part of a larger drainage area that •g extends from the railroad1roadonthenorthtotheoutletintoBeaverLake. Some of the storm drainagesystemisinplacebutthemaintrunkandpondingsystemremainstobeconstructed. The developer agrees to work with the city 'and i n area y staff n develop-i n 9 P 9 s that benefit the entire drainage area. Before completionmeoftheproposeddevelopmennt, the ponding and outlet system should be.constructed, however, limited development can take lac •to the resent drainage P e with no additionsPinagesystem .
Parks
The city's bicycle routes/trails ma showss a proposed tra running north andsouththroughthecenterofthissite. The director of communrnty serve ces statesthat "at this time it appears to me that the trail should not be a limiting factorinthedevelopmentofthisplannedunitdevelopment. The 'P e construction limitsisindicatethatapproximatelyone -third to one-half of the property ill be used forcondominiumhomes. Asa ark system
y °
P y we would be interested in investigating thepossibilityofacquiringstablepropertythatcouldbeusedforaplaygroundandalsopropertythatcouldbeaddedtothereservationof 'P Jim's Prairie.
The Park and Recreation Commission at i ' litheisApril18meetingrecommended. thatnorthernhalfofthePUD, as i t . appears on the pro osal would 'rdin grading
P P s uld be left intact re-ga •
shed to notify
g g ding or any other land use that presently xists." The 'w the C " Recreation
y e also
y Council that the Park and Commission is concernedaboutthehighconcentrationofpeopleinthisareaof 'the city due to the develop-ment of another trailer court, town houses and condominiums, and none of thedevelopersareprovidingactiverecreationalfacilitiesf 'or their tenants.
Other Agencies
The Environmental Quality Board (EQB) previously approved an environmental assess-ment worksheet for the previous plan. The E B stQ aff i s reviewing this proposaland. will inform us if further approvals are requiredred forq the new plan.
6 -_
Procedure
1. Planning ,Commission recommendation to city council,
2. City council holds a public hearing and makes a decision,
jc
enclosures
1 - Resolution
2 Location Map
3.- Property Line Map
4 1973 PUD
5, Letter
Bicycle Routes/Trails
7, Neighborhood Park Concept
g, Site Plans (2)
g_ Building Elevations (Separate Document)
y
7
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Maplewood, Mai nnesota was duly called and held in the Council
Chambers, in said City on the day of 1983 at 7:00 .m.P
The following members were present:
The following members were absent: s
WHEREAS, Castle Design and Development Co., Inc. initiated proceedings
before the City Council to amend the special use permit for a planned unit
development (PUD) covering the following-described property:
That part of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 lying southeasterly of a l i n e
from the northeast corner " -of said NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 to a point .
on the west l i n e of said NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 and 450 feet south of
the original C. ST. P. M. & 0. RY. *ri ght -of -way; also the SW 1/4
of the SE 1/4; all in Section 24, Township .29, Range 22, Ramsey
County, Minnesota, subject to Maryland Avenue,
i
said property being located generally north of Maryland Avenue and west of
iFerndale Street.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this PUD amendment is as follows:
1. This conditional use permit amendment was initiated by Castle Design
and Development Company, Inc. pursuant to the Maplewood Code of
Ordinances.
2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning
Commission on May 2, 1983. The Planning Commission recommended to
the City Council that said permit be denied.
3. The Maplewood, City Council held - a public hearing on May 9, 1983 to
consider his PUD amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed
pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an
opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council
also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and
Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL THAT condition
one of the 1973 PUD be' revised as Jollows:
Y The site plan approved in 1973 shall be revised to resite the 110
units from along the northerly boundary of the PUD to the north side
of Maryland Avenue. The plan dated April 27, 1983 shall beF he
specific development plan north of . Maryland Avenue, subject o design
review board approval. Any changes that result in an i nCr e in
density or change in building type or site plan shall require a P ubTi c
hearing and approval by the city council. Approval of the plan north
of Maryland Avenue is subject to the following' conditions:
a. The two existing parcels shall be combined into one parcel.
b. A11 common areas shall be maintained b a homeowners' 'y eowners association.
The city attorney must approve all rules and by-' laws. Any changes
affecting the common areas shall require prior city council
approval.
c. The Ci ty Council must order a feasibility study for the water main
on McKnight Road and the elevated storage prior to canstructi on of
phases three and four of the proposal.
d. The City Council must order a public improvement for the ondi nP 9andstormwateroutletsystemtoBeaverLakepriortoconstruction
of phases three and four of this proposal,
e. Dedication of 33 feet of right -of -way for Maryland Avenue. _
f. Grading on the north part of the property shat 1 not affect the
city property called "Jim's Prairie."
g. The developer shall make available to the City an area suitable
for a ' nei ghborhood park as indicated in the Maplewood Comprehensive
Plan. Location and size to be agreed upon by the developer and
the Director of Community Services. If purchase is necessary, the
City will follow Its procedures for establishing the value of the
land. Any costs of appraisals or other expenses shall be paid by
t the developer.
Approval is based on the following findings of fact:
1. Storm water drainage and pondi ng together with city water and sanitary
sewer facilities providing for the public health, safety and welfare
are adequately addressed by. the above conditions.
2. Maryl ake Road is not required to be constructed as a result of the
revised PUD resulting in a financial benefit to the City.
3. While there may be an increase in local traffic over the 1977 P 1 an,the overall impact on the neighborhood will be less, si nce Maryland
Avenue and-Ferndale Street have been put through since 1977. This
allows a better di spersi.on of traffic.
4. Maryland Avenue and Ferndale Street are designed to adequately handle
this local traffic. They are designated as major and minor collectors,
respectively, on the city's land use
There are only two more units proposed than were approved in the 1973
PUD and only si xteen more than the 1977 plan Significant areas of
open space will be retained for environmental protection and aesthetics.
This would be an improvement over the 1977 plan in that nd grading would
GO-be required for a golf course.:
b. The change proposed to the PUD through the amended speci a se permit
enhance and promote the public's health, safety and welfare,
7. An environmental assessment worksheet is not necessary, based upon
comparing the number and type of units, overall density, sizes and
locations of structures, impervious surface areas, traffic, u t i l i t i e s ,
drainage, roads and surrounding development. The city council finds
that the differences are not significant between the current and
1977 projects that affect the environment.
8. Unstable, peaty soils are prevalent across the midsection of the
property making access and utility service difficult to the northern
s s,
area.
9. The current proposal is consi sent with the city's comprehensive plan.
The proposed density would be less than allowed by the plan.
Seconded by Ayes- -
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF RAMSEY } SS.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the
City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared
the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City
of Maplewood, held' on the %day of 1983, with the original on file
in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom
i nsofar as the same relates to an amendment to a PUD. :
Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City is
day of 1983.
City Cl erk
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
30
E AvE,L ARPE WT 0
CD
IDAHO AVE.w
4.
AL0
tc X
MCKTANA A .,r
cr •
ry-
RYLAKE D.
IVY N4.
h Trailer Court
68 (Private) ......
E. MAF ND ................. AV E ,
LE R 0 S 7 AV S T31 -------
69 z --1.7
IG RAN 6)
D Beover N.- LIA AVE.
0 or
0.
L 0 e W * •t Z7f
0
69CAS@kolj I.- z HARVE
AVE.C;0 _j
BRAND AVE
32 T
7TH AVE. Z" E. 7 TH AVE
BUSH ..Ilk 25130
R22W RZIWAVE. w 36131w
E_ HINNEMANA AVE 0$70) )
34 164 __
ttachment one
LOCATION MAP'&
I
f •
r •
art•
od do
Ad
a+
a•
FUTURE SITE OF
t , -PEARSON ESTATES
MOBILE HOME PARK
AJ
2
me 4
S
0 A'
5 C)j
XfA _.
13 Q
C
AVER LAKE .1-20
TATES MOBILE -: _T - _ _r • --z CAVES CENTURY
ME PARK • - -
cn ADDITION QUADS
PROPQSED - BEAVER CREEK -4
ONDOMINIUM SITE 32
3 4
W dw-4
t
s•
33 'rI ig 0 M Ar -1 ? N
3 r s L• tti v • a ems„
avrcvr A
Attachment two _
PROPERTY LINE
RL 26.5 acres •''' -'_. " • - - - -- _ -
J '
RMI 52.5 '' %*STRlA - ;t;`:. 1 . " - -- : •ti j X7.3
O; ... 29 , ,. •.
108.0 acres q_: !•' -',`• •:_ , ti tir
Ito
13.8people /ecre (p ., -== =s , i -. ; ;::::; • -._N = =`-• . __ --
1 i • t • - 11_ 1` _ `
bee
51 • : i 1 ` •r -a, Z
i • / I • • I i ,rte _-. ', , ,\ ,
DAPvOIL
t•IL• ` ti ' • • •` WW iiI ; i t1 5 / 7 1 iii - i • I , l_ r:T =••
Jai • , , •. , . , , -. ;
1
osve o POSS110E 1, N
i • ! ;a FUTURE.. 4 _ - : `` •
ALIGN . , +
OF FERNOAL5,CS it _f1 64 4
1n =: -- ; 23 acres ; . ,; ; , ; ; • .._-'" f
Aar,
f {
oft If I I I/
06. .
r `, "b". .......• ••............ % : % t•].Iq • ' / /' +// 1 , _- 1 »_ --1 ! • , • ~
i
RM
140units . '
f , i 1 i 2 ..8 p/a i. . , 1 1 , I 1 t / ! • t „ rr
r• + ; s / i :; 83 Ui itS i ' t t ; / L.: •+ i i tv
r' •/ 220 p /a = I ; ; • 1.;; - ; f; / —•
P9 If
4. -
eve-
8Dunib9 M _
22.0 p/a -. _•_- ; ; . '"• ,r
5 -fit, ,
i
ti - -_: •
r , _ • '26.5 acres • _ - /
14.0 p 1 - I
jppw,, %
ft
iJL .'Jr' Pit A AID L L. -GR;
w BEAVER - - - - - -- _.% j FLA%',I DEVELOPMENT
CREEK ma .. Fccl, ii::rt;ao;a
ELEiA. - sscy. land use/density
it
Attachment three
1973 PUD i
N
Attachment tour
It
Design & Development Co. Inc.
2419 No.Margarei St North StPau1.MN 5510'9 Phone 770 -6138
t
Y ;I
r
f
s
April 11, 1983
Honorable Mayor _
Honorable Councilpersons
City of Maplewood
Maplewood, Minnesota
Castle Design & Development Co., I nc. has - recently purchased the property locatedatFerndaleandMarylandwhichconsistsfb9acres,
p y
In 1913 the City Council of Maplewoodp granted a Planned Unit Development for thiproperty. This P.U.D. consisted of 340 total units w a con fgurat of part of _e - uni is to be on the South and the remainder at the North e dn of the property.
At that time it was anticipated that -Maryy Lake Road (Ol Dump Road) would be continuedontoservicethepropertytotheNorth.
At that time also, very little consideration was 'v •
ar _
g en to the soil conditionon ofthisparticularpieceofproperty..
Sometime later the City of Maplewoodewood i -y p initiated the construction of the continuanceofMarylandAvenue - togethe with sewer and water.
The assessment which resul against this parts cul ar piece of property came toatotalsumof $325,000.00 - which was extremely high,y 9
Since the council action of 1973 said 'that in the event any changes were contem-pl a lied in the configuration of streets, unit 1 acement 'a i can m
p or number of units, thepptmustgobackbeforethecouncilforapprovaL
We are not contemplating asking for a9 change in number and as there was no streetconfigurationatthetime.
We are nowt aski ng that there be a change i n the config9 of the placement oftheunitsts.-
M 7 -
4 !-
i
i
To install Mary Lake Road at this time is totall u r asyne onabl a due to the fact
It would only service one property and also as the council in approvingn Pearso '
l ans - the p. 9 n sTrailer -Court p e property now owned by Pearson would have np use for thatroad.
n
4#Je are submitting a plan which entails moving all the allowable units under the 1973P.U.D. ib the South portion of the property; thereby taking total advantaoe of
0'
atheutilitiesintactandmakingthecostofthoseutilitiesmore 1 i cable to the
ro •ect'and dispersingersin the' PP
p p g it cost where they become more equitable.
I . hope our . relationship in the past and Castle Design & Development Co's reputationwiththecattdyoowhattheysaytheywi11 - wi 11 hel p you to come to a favorabl e _
decision on this new development.
kdg /jmg
I -
terva i s /Vice Pres
Ca sign & Dev . Co, , Inc.
s
l11 .1 V M"O ,.M.16 KOO"" M
s
1
r ..
th4 RW is b
mmeeft 0* Wv "W
rd be tow plec •
J
CI
tM
Gab
Or
I M
Is .routesb
Exis'ting Bicycle Route (on street )
6"
dad
0
Existing Bicycle Route (off street)
Potential Bicycle Routes (on street)
Potential Bicycle Routes (off street)
County Proposed Bicycle Routes
2 Proposed Regional Trail
3 City Proposed Off - Road Bicycle Routes
Source, Minnesota Department of Natural Resource
1 •...•....r
ter• t. eN
1
t •, • 'R ; 'li • , •
Y
j
wwwwww//'
M y ,
96-42 IL
14 N . G3
re
ode
i
f $p ,p
o
rt. r,•ut, r ' •
go
Lb t_ , ,
1 •••••
1t
fie
two
00
aw
s ; Maplewood • , .., «,,,,, E_
Transportati Plan, Barton- Aschman and City of M
O O O O `1 X01'/411 NCttsr 1• , ,•, '.'w . • 1pnnot f
3 Fulurf Fvlurf _,M p .. , M P • I'
A" M
too
I on" low
t
1 two"" «.
r•1:AZ W O D
r KOHL AN -.
FuLAKE turfs!
MP r -_ Perk District and Boundary
FOUR
This meq s IOr runnrq c V r` glamor, 3$4ASONx fouroosesonlyerosnoub
not be used rr+,ere wecee >
BsUrlrl"I Is reQuired
O1 %fi ft ca ® FUkif
M
Future' !, I
l
t M Z AL
00 N
all
fleet"
CD
loft
GLO
all
r... J . ,>• r ' i _ '
11 I _
I L1 , t
la p ,
0 t _ e j 0 a me
040 11 — e4uM00IdH
t
3w
rn /•r
it t. t. • t , . • .
3w
a. 6--pa
law
AF TON .,..
1-MIGHT
Mr{ .
1. l ' nl
1 '
fh
itr •
M Future I q . •r A
ISTA_ •,GOAL 1 Park / 3000 Residents and Parks ' . .HILLS
Within 1 /2 Mile of Residents
Existing Neighborhood Park and Service ' Radius ,!
Fulurl
oft
U e ,
Mini•Parks r '
f --
Proposed Neighborhood Perk and Service Radiu t 2
w
1.110NIV, L •
1 =
t
PLEASANT ,.
Future sites are search areas only .
soft a
1 r
rPreparedby: _ 1
O .i J , + 1 ,. '
owe,
10 t
O a rk .
fNwr a •fa"
w .
4
3 M OMNI A, a •
lilts ADO tl Ce M M E '`' • -- • ,
1 / .•/r.;.e tieer , sd ee ttn
October 1980
r
1
1• • ,• »' ~tom r • •
1 ' • • . • •
I
I •'. • , • •••• • / IMII 111 / tt
IL M .
owl
1 , ..•. ."1.Ie.wlNwr•1 ..tt•IIr / 1• w eewp • :t.• .... t' .• Ir.... .i' • ' •........... •I. , • t ( t • I {• 1 • / —••. .cam gag - . . . . . z .. gaga.. • i . • t .••.. 1
1 11 11• r
I
1 • .
I
f . I.I..... j• •
its
1 ' 111.1 ' f .. I • ` • f N w• '• • .. • ,
TTT !
of
1, • 1 At , . .
i •• •... "••. '"''''''1'' Q 1, . 1
1 • • ''• ` 46 \ I r 1
A •• • ••• • ' 1 A ' • '•,','•••', • •'; ,•
Its 1 T If •. ' 1 , f , '•
No t
fA • 1 • • • 1 i' i 1 . • % .1 •tr • •.r••.. .•••' • I ••, ••• • • ,i • 1..•.. • , 1M • •.• r••• ••.t r•M
dat 040 Ike
v 000 .
1.1• 11 .1• '', ' 1 ' ~ • r I ' t • i • ' i•`• I' ' , . t 1 • • • ' •1 ' 1 /•I• • 1 • R
t . •+ • •• 1 • • • I i
S 1 i, ••• • ' I • ,w. ~y'' ,•' r !r. t• •. \ l •• • 1• t. f
1
1 1 1 • . No
1 •• I •
4 • \) 1
111 ; ' _ • • • • . • •/ 1 , ••• • • , 1 • ••wo. '
1 • • 1 'I • 1 / ` ' • 1 • , ` . •, 1 • • h '•/ .1 ,tit+. • I •'
11
0 00 * to
l of
to I Y I '.' .6 -I'd as
1 • • • •• k . • r / Ifl• • f1 1 •Poll.rte• . i • i' ' • 1 i ' • 1 . / {I
1 ti ,• ,• •1 . r r1 Iw r . • ,, ;! . , .,Ir' •,. .` 1
If1 • ,• • , 1 11 • i • r/r •, ,. • • • 14 1
1be
t •, . 1 •• . N1 •• .
J .
w p11 •
1 • , • i t
7 • r I /I- f I • I • • • ' •'1 ' t•
I. • • • F_' •1
1 1 ' y • = II 1 1 • •
v 1 • 1
Ne is to
M
r ( 1 1 , • I C=
NO0-694 ' s
4. • • • • , +' ! • •1` •• 1 •• f •• ••' w .' = 1.7 • • • IIII1111i 1 , ••. ..,,.
I 1 • /i • 1 ' •
f • . i ' • •I ••••..•.. ! • •t i•oi.• . IIii..'.• • +
Z_
f •N •1 •• M1 • •• .•• • • •• t
M• ••rte. w w •.- • •..•g _ g • •... / • • . •. • • M
40
gn• • •y •' 1
11. it.d; • • \ .Ir .• •I.ee.. • ,•' w.•w f•ee 11• ••.•. ww. T i.{i jaw.• • .` +• w ' n . 71R .7> ' .. • ' •. . • • , • • /• ••••• •••II• • •« g , .• .N•• fiat • • • •16 iAi1 •re•e1t 'e; 41
1 ' {, •, ` ; •. ; ,'••. •••• , ••.••I• 1`•.. ` ^t• ". ••••I:: "••: •'11 . • ; ,•• { ••• • • •1 •1
t • / j , + • tf ''I• ••• •fit •, It t'•. . . , •' r .•r•N.rrf• •• 1 ••
1'
t • /1 •'•;• 1 • f ` ,1 • t •, I, W"41 •, • • 1,11 tla • •
w••r••••••••.• •.•1••f ItItI
MYNI •• Mwt 1
TNfrCA •ukasit 61MOG11 COUNT . L1116L Q[M6111'TQN '
LEV"UIi1T A UNIT •UNIT C UNIT a UNIT a'1
Iti 1QOA 1 UNITS-1 UNItt 1 UNIT-1 whit •
01 1M1, A 10 5111 an IN w TM is Nit, AFL of I9C111 R
h, 141 A ti ""M COUNTY. MIM•1tW4,
l a A'/1• A'I t r sea 1 t /1•I
a/.Ita1 10
WM11,AItyi AN•
11
111 A401A 1 .11111 •
l a A'
5•_111•
IM T1 •
i t A'114
1 YI•II•
1 Will f t •
1 111'1 SA
1 N1111}
1 1 A' NLI
MMf11•
11
balk, 11016"s IYMIt•
1•A'sa.Iaa'st.1•Arwl 114ICA 11
TMIIT Ir{IrT M T// no Ur 01 t1I[ all 1111111 iN.Two lea a '
w w W OI tM1 Ka IIiF /AO• blt IN C60d
MO /t AAtA ISII p[ampl1011 .//2•AM6 a••MCI" j," •••r •••• comp •••
0ipAr01MTpN11KM +IIL 0/ We sew W 01 M N W 6015 ITNUT 4*01 W WAT 1O•ACKI 416041 itA lo" ... ^ - we •
a110 •to ruT / a i1M 1101141NA4. c 01 546 A a IR AYIIT
IIAI Ir1Y 111 WRL11M n11 ••...•g•r•r••
01 1M1, A 10 5111 an IN w TM is Nit, AFL of I9C111 R
h, 141 A ti ""M COUNTY. MIM•1tW4,001{MNtO"A t PLAN-4-1 A9aN&09 & M10SIM "SU AKar/IA
loru{n LIII
6416104 t'C0111NA ••......•••••..,. •••••a/.Ita1 10
WM11,AItyi AN•916ST04 7011"46• t•tA" 1115484116L 911111411014 a QatQlj. ••...•.UN. •,•.. «.. « I
IM{OrMAD 10"60' A -1 M INSWA 9111111111" 111WO .t AMA I •
M. am au• wnw 6-- itiI1.A &S
W / 70111 baftIAA1 ILIIN
IW •
Y1111t• •N astalw l /MIt11i"ft tfl.ae WONtatALt
WSI
IYI
A'S
It•
IS
Awui1• U" 101" 1.7"11 /[A *%MA A ANAL • 1.18100 big" oft"l s:t IW tI'tltA A'I W 1 Ir7anJ I. A'/ • • • pull, will 1N{0
Z 10iA i111I1t 04"" • $40 , IF
1 Iwft Onto f+ has" . 140
j r A•IN • . Y M {I M • M • • eowmp• ^ • /IPt h • •wly..MANIM1!OM /[pL11A rAVIM1 flll i •IAIMI+trNIM• '
1i. • .' •: - • i • r^ , •. Law 1SIOC1ATla1 , /
1 • . ! • Of STiLLWATtr '
qtr
f «,,.., M ..M _
n. «tl.» . a1. 1 BEAVER CREEK ,
sMI 1M• N 51+0.0 1 • INA . / , • "
0111111 • 1CONDOMINIUM ••
1 •M 1 j Swill it AY, .ILr• /salA 66160 • IMNIU 1NMES11 1.1.1 "111 ••••
gaga.. . ,.. ..
N r••'a'+1•••••- » - ..•.1. -.- • - .. • •.......... .......IT .• • • .. gamew
ll 1 1
w
iI rr - r ' _ '• III \ „ _
sib
r : y, 1 -. _ .w.. -.r • - _... . y _ . --.i.. , • r ' ' - I - .. -. _ .. .. - - ., • • Lam•
a %%
g®r
y j. ' —" -- it , ,i I i • ; / •
1.. ! - •'/ is . =•,. 1
0, - .. 0
Ar 0
v lip
Jv loe
Ar
0 f / I /
41
1 s4 40F
i ! • •7 • s . j / twJl
P
11• • •. i
0 , •
r _
t
r
lb
400P r
l
APap
1 '
r _
oc
CPR
s ' 1 -
T_
01A • % •4418 1
pm
j
4L •
1 •. . % • N • •
s
IL
dp
oil 40P is / „e
v 060
1 . • -
lab Mai
ter/ 1 ; __ -_ • - --
1 1K , « S H Q • Q i M • - '
f 3 _is
i•+"c• •.. .. ..... .. vaw•ar 11•f••••KlO IZD[wt cu•dwwss •Yr1"
o. st•u..aa.
s. BEAVER CREEK
M •.r ..............r..... ; r aNd • W 4. s
r...w. .., .,
Y
fmwft wl OEM_ • mucNIP a !rte CONDOMI • .., ..., . !UM HOMES
less
CI '
D. PUD Revision: Maryland and Ferndale . ( Beaver Creek Condos)
Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting a revision of the 1973
r planned unit development approval to relocate the 110 units approved for the
north part of the site to the south part.
The . Commi st i on questioned if there would be a problem with one of the
b u i l d i n g s being only 6 inches higher elevation than the pond.i ng area.
Director of Public Works said further review through the Communit
Design Review Board process would prevent any problem. The - plans presented
at this time are not final plans.
Chairman Axdahl asked if anyone wished to comment on the proposal,
Ken Gervai s, Castle 'Design and Development Company, said the site is
difficult to work with, the did extensive soil borings, about 22 acres of
the 69 acre parcel can be used. He said they have a problem with storm
water, it is all going onto his property from surrounding land. They have
agreed to work with the City to give some of the land to the city to
construct a storm sewer . in. They have a large . assessment against the
property for public improvements. They are proposing approximately two
more units than the 1973 PUD permitted. It is not feasible to spread
the units on the northerly portion of the site.
Dale Hamilton said they are in the process of .setting b u i l d i n g
elevations right now, they have a preliminary grading plan at this
time and the soils company is reviewing i t - a n d make recommendations
on the elevations.
Steve Oman, 1114 Sterling Street, he questioned if the EAW that
was done when he was owner of the property:)would not satisfy the
requirements. That EAW was done under the original plan, with
170 units to the north, a 9 hole 'golf course through the middle,
13 acres of park property. The proposal is now to move all of the
density just north of Maryland Arenue. There is a stipulation
entered into with the City which specifies the plan will not be changed
These issues should be answered before approving a change in the plan.
He suggested the request be tabled.
Don Christianson, 1111 E. County Road C, said he wished to discuss
the park planning in this area. In the original proposal, 1973 proposal,
with golf course, pondi ng, park areas and trails, the trail was to
connect from the site into a proposed trai on adjacent property. This
proposal has made that not feasible because the trail would have to go
through the wetland area. one of the complaints at the Parks meeting was
that there was not much consideration made for the people moving into
thi area. No recreational l and is being provided. No recreati land
is being provided under this proposal, The Parks Commission is going to
have to study the area to find out where a _park can go in this area. Also
consideration has to be given as to how the people will get to a recreational
area. Some property will have to be acquired i n the a ref -
Mr. Gerva i s said he did talk to the Parks Director and informed him
there is property available on the north end,ad j acent to the City pThereis * . approximately 5 good acres there. He informed the city they could
have the property if they wished. He was informed this would be discussed
later.
Mr. Christianson said the Parks Commission would have to discuss the
property with the developer. It ' would have to be determi necL . i f the property
is accessible.Maryl ake Road i s not owned by the Ci The only road
to Jim's Prairie is through a swamp. Would the developer put in roads or
trails into the acreage proposed to recreation land,
Mr. Christianson said the City should not only-bebe concerned with meetingyy9
densities in the area but also provide recreational facilities. The park
charges that will be collected for this development will not provide sufficient
monies to purchase land and it develop it,
Mr. Oman said under the 1973 proposal there was 13 acres proposed for
parks. Now no acreage is provided. This. is one reason the EAW would not
cover this proposal .
Mr. Gervai s indicated the property proposed for dedication to the
City under the 1973 proposal was under water.
Mr. Oman said some of the property proposed for dedication was b
Marys ake Road. _ It
Mr. Gervai s said Mary lake road is not owned by the City, therefore
access would not be provided to the property.
The Commission asked if the sewer capacity on Maryland will be threatened
by the additional units proposed.
Mr. Haider said that to his knowledge all of the sewage was proposed
to go to Maryland Avenue and not use Maryl ake Road. There is a problem
with the old sewer, not as a result of this development, something in the
future there will' be a capacity problem. -
The Commissi also asked if the City Attorney had reviewed the
proposal and i f any comment was made as to the effect of the change
of the proposal on the EAW.
Mr. Olson said he did call the Attorney who w i l l be doing research
on the document mentioned by Mr. Oman, however, he suggested the
Planning Commission act on the proposal as a planning question . Whether
Vie EAW covers this proposal is a legal question .
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend that the
City Council replace condition one of the 1973 PUD with the following
wording: -
1. The site plan approved in 1973 shall be revised to move .1.4- e 110 units
approved along the northerly boundary of the PUD to the - rth s de of
Maryland Avenue. The plan dated April 27, 1983 shall be the specific
development plan nofth of Maryland Avenue, subject .to design review
board approval. Any changes that result in an increase in density or
change in building type or site plan shall require a public hearing
and approval by the city council. Approval of the plan north of
Maryland Avenue is subject to the following conditions:
6
a. The two existing parcels shall be combined as one parcel.
b. Al 1 common areas shall be maintained by the homeowners' association.
The city : attorney must approve all rules and by -laws. Any changes
affecting the common areas shall. require city council approval.
c. The City Council must order a f e a s i b i l i ty study for the water main
on McKnight Road and the elevated storage prior to construction of
phases three and four of the proposal.
d. The City Council must order a public improvement for the ponding
and storm water outlet system to Beaver Lake prior to construction
of phases three and four of the proposal.
e. Dedication of 33 feet of right -of -way for Maryland Avenue.
f. Grading on the north part of the property shall not affect the city
property called "Jim's Prairie."
g. The developer shall make available to the City an area suitable for
a neighborhood park as indicated in the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan.
Location and size to be agreed upon by the developer and the Director
of Community Services. If purchase is necessary, the City w i l l
follow its procedures for establishing the value of the land. Any
costs of appraisals or other expenses shall be paid by the developer.
Commissioner El l efson seconded
Some of the Commissioners indicated they were not sure if the EAW
is sufficient to define the status of the property. They would l i k e to
see this answered prior to making a decision. There was also concern
concerning providing public water for the site.
Mr. Haider indicated that one of the conditions of the approval is that
a feasibility study be prepared to investigate additions to the water system.
The City did recognize this problem with the water sygtem a number of years
ago, It was also thought to construct the utility improvements at the
same time McKnight realignment is constructed. This would be a great
cost savi n 9 s . However, this construction of McKnight Road may be a few
ye away, therefore, the water situation should be addressed now.
The Commission also discussed the fact that Maryl ake Road is not
goingn9 to be constructed , discussed the soil conditions of the northerly
and southerl y site, whether the City would want to acquire the northerly
site for park purposes, the number of units proposed in the southerly
portion of the site. They also questioned what would prevent the
development of the northerly area at a later date since it would still
be within the density limitations of the plan.
Secretary Olson said there is nothing to prohibit the M"' l opment
of the northerly site. It would have to be approved by th unci l .
s
Mr. Gervais said the outlots would be owned b t 'y e assoaton, notthedeveloper. It would have to be the association '
of th requesting thedevelopenortherlysite.
Y v
Voting on the motion: Ayes -- Commissioners Fische r, El l efson, HeinyNays—Commissioners Axdahl , Garrett, Pe11 i shPrew, Si gmundi k, Whitcomb. - '
Action by Co unci-
TO City Manager Endor
FROM: Director of Community Developmentu_
SUBJECT: Code Amendment -- Metal Buildings
DATE: May 13, 1983 D a e
Council gave first reading to the enclosed ordinance on May 12. Paragraph 3
was added to allow the Council to grant variances to the ordinance.
Recommendation
Approval of the enclosed ordinance.
mb
Enclosure
Ordinance
ORDINANCE No.
i M ICI It. 11 •1!' ! / • I Y• ' • / !.
Zixe City 4»cil of the City of Maplewood does Hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1. Section 202.240 of the Maplewood Cbde is hereby addedded to read as follows
202.240 SPBCIAL AREAS
1. It shall be unlawful to erect a metal buildin in the Ci .g y , of Maplewood whichisofadesign , commonly referred to as a metal pole building' , " le },warn"or "a i- building °gr • g , unless such building would be located in a F, FarmResidenceDistrorunlesssuchbuildingisametalstoragebuildingmyusedasabackandstoragesh
g g
y g shed. Should any dispute arise over theclassi. ficativn of a proposed metal building, the Director of Cbn
shall. determine whether tY Develogrent
r the proposed metal , buildingbullding fits into the 'metalpolebuilding" category. Appeals of the Director's decisionion shall be made totheCityClouicilforadeterminationofbuildingtype.
2 . Buildings having - .metal exteriors, but not being f the typical '
may
g tYP pole buildingdesign, gn, y only be allowed in areas zoned F, Farm Pesidence, B C, BusinessOmniercial, M-1, TAght Manufacturing and M-2, Heavy manufacturin Specialgdesignandnorunetaldecorativemod.i.fications may bearchitecturaldesi edtoassureeorrpatibilitywithcatimmitydevelopment.
30 The City Council may hear requests for variances from the literal .provi.sion.softhisordinanceininstanceswhereitsstrictenforcementwouldcauseunduehardshipbecauseof "circumstances unique to the individual pro underderconsideration, and to grant such variances only when it is de onstrated thatsuchactionswillbeinkeepingwiththespiritandintentoftheordinance.Undue. hardship" is used in connection with the granting eofavariance meansthepropertyinquestioncainotbeputtoareasonableuseifusedundertheconditionsallowedbytheofficialcontrols. The plight of the landc wner isduetocircumstancesuniquetohisrnotcreatedbPoPeYrythelandownerand
variance from the ordinance, if granted, will not alter the essential
character of the locality.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in 'forve after its passageandpublication.
Passed by the City Council of
the City . of Maplewood, Minnesota,
this day of , 1983e,
Mayor
Attest:
Ayes --
City Clerk Sys -
B. Metal Building Ordinance e _ a a- e =
The Board discussed with Secretary Ekstrand the different types of
metal buildings that can be constructed that would give the "pole building"
appearance. They also reviewed the metal buildings that have been constructed
in Maplewood. The Board discussed what types of treatments can be applied
to metal buildings to make them more compatible to the surrounding develop-
ment. The Board and Secretary Ekstrand commented on the zoning districts
a metal building should be permitted in.
Board Member Hedlund moved the Board recommend the following addition
to the Maplewood Code: _
202.040 Special Areas
1. It shall be unlawful to erect a metal building i n the 'City of Maplewoodwhichisofadesigncommonlyreferredtoasa "metal pole buildingpolebarn" or %gri -building," unless such building would be located i n
a F, Farm Residence District or unless such building is. a metal storage9buildingcommonlyusedasabackyardstorageshed. Should any dispute
arise over the classification of a proposed metal building, the Director
of Community Development shall determine whether the proposed metalPP
building fits. into the "metal pole building" category. Appeals of
the Director's decision shall be made to the City Council for a
determination of building type.
2. Buildings having metal exteriors, but not being of the typical pole
building design, may only be allowed in areas zoned F, Farm Residence,
BC, BC, Business Commercial M -1, Light Manufacturing and M -2, Heav
Manufacturing. Speci al architectural design and nonmetal decorative
modifications may be required to assure compatibilitybi1it with communiPYY
devel opment. ,
Board Member Deans seconded Ayes - all*
TO:City Manager Action by Council:
FROM:Tom Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:Metal Building Variance Endorsed
LOCATION:2483 Highway 61 Mop_ fL_APPLICANT:Zuercher Well Drilling eiOWNER:Al Zuercher
PROJECT:Metal Storage Buildi
DATE:March 14, 1983
SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL
Requ
Approval of a variance to construct a 30 by 40 foot metal pole building for use
as a storage garage.
Proposal
1. Refer to the site plan and building elevations.
2. The proposed structure would be a typical metal- ribbed pole building with a
gable roof.
3. The proposed structure would be placed behind the existing home and garages.
CONCLUSION
Issues
The goal of the new ordinance regulating metal building design, is to prohibit
metal pole buildings which are not architectural pleasing from being constructed
in--highly vi si bl a commercial and industrial areas. In this instance, however,
the proposed building would be hidden from view behind an existing house and two
existing garages. The proposed building site is also at a lower grade elevation,
making it even more hidden from the street. Since the proposed pole buil
would be hidden from view, it would meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
Furthermore, it would not impact adjacent development because of its setback
behind the existing buildings.
Recommendation
Adoption of the enclosed resolution approving a variance for the construction
of a metal pole building at Zuercher Well Drilling, 2483 Highway 61, based on the
findings that:
7: The variance would meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance since the
proposed building would be concealed behind the existing buildings and not
in view from the highway*
2. The ro osed buildingpp would be compatible with the area and would not impa
adjacent development.
BACKGROUND
Site Description
1. Lot Size: Three acres
20 .Existing Land Use: House and garages. Zuercher Well Drilling presentlresentlybeingoperatedonthisproperty. 4
Surrounding Land Uses
Nbrtherly: Single dwelling
Southerly: Single dwelling, the Maple Leaf Drive-in Theatre entrance drive and
the Northernai re Motel
Westerly: Undeveloped property planned Rm, Medium Density Residential and zoned
F, Farm Residential. The Maple Leaf Drive-in Theatre.
Easterly: Highway 61
5-6-82: The City of Maplewood administratively approved the site P 1 an and
building elevations for the proposed metal building,
7 12 - 82: Council passed an ordinance regulating the construction of metal
buildings. This new ordinance took effect prior to the applicant's appliforabuildingpermit,
9- 13 -82: Andy Zuercher appeared before the City Council requestingn permissionYqgpon to
bui 1 d the pole bu as approved by Staff. Council stated he could apply for
a variance.PP Y
DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
Planning
1. Land Use Plan Designation: Rm
2. Zoning: M -1
3. ordinance 517 of the City Code states the following:
a. It shall be unlawful to erect a metal buildingdin i n the Ci of Mew9YPood
which is of a desi gn commonly referred to as a "metal pole bui 1 di n ,"it
opole barn" o r" ' i
g
p agri - bui l ding, unless such building would be located n
a F, Farm Residence District or. unless such building is a metal storagebuildingcommonlyusedasabackyardstorageshed. Should an diute9ypariseoverthe - cl assi fi cati on of a proposed metal building, the Director
of Communi Development shall determine whether the r e
b
d metal
i
P
buildingding fi is into the "metal pole building" di ng" category
Director's . .
eal s of .the
deci sion shall be made to the City Council for a determination
of building type-
2 --
b. Buildings having metal exteriors, but not being of the typical pole building
design, may only be allowed in areas zoned F, Farm Residence, BC, Business
Commercial, M-1, Light Manufacturing and M -2, Heavy Manufacturing. Special
architectural design and nonmetal decorative modifications may be required
to assure compatibility with community development.
4. Statutory requi rements :
State law requires that the following findings be made before a variance
can be granted:
s
a. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances
unique to the individual property under consideration
b. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
ordinance.
Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance,
means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under
conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is
due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and
the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the
locality.
Public Works
1. Water: Available.
2. Sewer: Available.
3. Drainage: To existing system on Highway 61. A Swale crosses the back of
the property 200' - 350' west of proposed building. Drainage does not appear
to be a problem.
4. Traffic: Highway 61 is a major arterial.
1. Recommendation by the Community Design Review Board, .
2. Public Hearing and decision by the City Council (three votes are required
for approval).
mb
Ens
1
2=.
3.
4
5.
closures:
Location Map
Property Line Map
Site Plan
Building Elevations
Resolution
3 -
Gervois
Lake
Q
0
Q
Z
Q
V
bU) :.
13. KOMLMAN CT. 9
22
r Q
Koh /q7on .
Loke
v
I
J
N
PALM CT. W
a
U
ViiK;NG _
H W
o
Q Q
0 Q
U
cr
W Z Q
BURKE AV,
LDRIDGE LA V.
BELMONT
g
4
KILLMAN A .
N
3
W K NWC C
cr
Z uJ ~ W
I
01— •
a m o
Ix
MT.
W
W Z VENON
n
W o 60
d W Ix 0 26w
c 3
BELL Y 4L
a Z
W
Z Y
W
EY AV E. 4
4 .
i o
3
I J
KOHLMAN [AVE.N
Q
UNTY ROAD . "E
I !N
W Z
Q
Q
c
I AVE
6 a
m
tf
L 1
SE X1
E,Q GERVAIS AVE.
G ANDVIEW AVE
VIKING i. Urc•
LA.
s
Keller
oke
Q
KING ISTON AVE.
Round
PR Ic
Z AVE 27` Q' Loke
r . - ' • . ' Vim
r---
SHERRE N AVE.
U)
U) OPE AVE
LARK AVE n LARK AVE.
J
T Y Cl L RO LAURIE RD.
0 ILELANDI LL JJLKLJ 25 SAND HURST
Z Cz
JUNCTION AVE
v
Q ,L
e P ' AVE. >-8U RK E t m a o
ELDRIDG AVE O
4.
o j
AN V
U SELMON T AVE. W
N
SK N VE. v SKI LLMA =N AVE _
J cwt AVE to
O m ,. +RYAN
5l RY AN c
R
v Q
ire 28 = o 0.;
17
L FROST u y AVE N w tr- vs v>'
d
a
62 W
W FE N AVE d
W a W N SU MM ER A v 4
D
GO
3
a cr. FRISSIE AVE. _ cr p
Sy
R o=. a #-= E = a
O Q
a W
Wokefield
L O a 'p S 0 PH IA ST v m o,Loke
Y Z f= 0 SOP HIA S T. d W
Pho /en d J a
O `z PRI CE AV GJ
W a
LA W P ENTELI j . - —
7 t f -'-1 7-1
LOCATION MAP 4
N
S r '
r ice. r
r
4J
P& oCA r FL Oww ee 7 O e 7 /!P 74f i
47 • (- eac t ,
ev
r r
r
rJ O 1 D !• 5 D c"C Wit.
43 2497
T J
3.0 0 ac • , r
T
I NGa-,. PROPOSED BUI LD C
UERCHER WELL DRILLING
tr f
c
11/ r 2471
4- A.
2
r
op -_ --- -
fit """^ f...""` ..
o s o, Z .'
p" r
53 ac SS9ac
04o Zp e c
A h 1
3 I
At of
4 2! . 9 7 9O
4 a 'r' `,o o b k,
G
t'
59ac
P MAP
WITH ZONING
y
r ,
w •...... ....... w.+._............_.w.._. w.w.- ..•......w. ..+..r.•..w._ _ ..._..- ._.. w. •..... .- ..,. -.w.. ... .. ... r ..._.... _. «.ww+ +_............... jam_. ... -... r..«w.. ... ._... . .. .... ..w .. ... ...
r
o
vp
I .
i
1
o4 E
Z IA
fill
r.r - .. ....
L
I CARAgE
4
L a 1 1r•1 e. s
5 •
i
1
i
I r
3o{
47 e v 4; Op
0 leo v Op 0
ws e Doer
rc
S
aq 6–e, Ij
M R"b. LLO J C-Wev- 4% towonep '
to o
ac.
bia
Ake6 &,
4 .
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City C
of the C •
y
ty. of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Counc
Chambers in-said City on the day of at p. m.n
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
WHEREAS Zuercher Well Dri initiated a - vari ance request to erect a
metal pole building in a M - Light Manufacturing District for the following-
described property:
Lot 3, except STH 61 -1 * and except the north . 85 feet of Lot 3, W.H.
Howa rds Garden Lots. .
This property i' s a l s o known as 2483 Highway 61 Maplewood; . .
WHEREAS the rocedural hi stor' of this :P y th variance request. i s as fol ows .
1. This variance request was initiated by Zuercher well Drill pursuant
to chapter 25, article III of the Maplewood Code of ordinances.
2. This variance request was reviewed by the Maplewood Community Designn9
Review Board on March 22, 1983. The Board recommended to the City
Council that said variance request be approved.
3. The Maplewoodewood Ci t Council held a publicc heari nPYP 9 on
to consider this variance request. Noti thereof was publ i shed
and mailed pursuant to law. persons resent at said hearingP9
were given an opportuni to be heard and present written statements.
The Counci also considered reports and recommendations of the city
staff and the Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD - CITY COUNCIL that the
above variance request be approved on the basis of the following
findings of fact:
1. The variance would meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance since the
proposed building would be concealed behind, the existing buildings and not
in view from the highway.
2.-4r proposed building would be compatible wi the area and woul d not
impact adjacent development.
Adopted this day of
Seconded by Ayes --
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY Sse
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
I the undersi bein the dul qualified and appointed Clerk of.the CitofMaplewood, Minnesota, do 'hereby certif that I have' carefull compared theattachedandforenextractofminutesofaremeetinoftheCitofMaplewood, held on the da of
9 19 with the ori0;""Ifile in m office, and the same • is a full, true and complete transcript there-
on
from insofar as the same relates to
Witness my hand as such Clerk and the -corporate seal of the City this -da of 19
It .
Cit Clerk
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
r
A. Zuercher Well Drilling--Metal BuiBuildingn Variance _ r 9> g 3 3
Andy Zuercher, owner of the Zuercher Well Drilling, said he is not sure
d f the complete roof l i n e of the building will be hid from Highway 61. He
hought possibly 3-to 4-feet may be seen. He indicated the roof will be
white, and the walls will be gold. The building is proposed to be used
for storage.
Board Member Folley moved the Board recommend to the Cily C.oull 1
approval of a variance for the construction of a metal pole building at
Zuercher' Well Drilling, 2483 Hi2hway 61 based on the findings that
1. The variance would meet the spirit and intent . of the ordinance since
the proposed building would be concealed behind the existing buildings
and not in view from the highway.
2. The proposed building would be compatible with the area and would not
impact adjacent dev -el opment.
Board Member Hedlund seconded Ayes - -a11.
r
i
ii
Acti on b C
ORDINANCE NO, ,
AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT CONCERN ` "ING ADOPTION
OF NATIONAL FIRE CODES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN ASFOLLOWS:
Section 10 ' Section 12 -51 of the Maplewood Code ofOrdinancesherebyamendedtoreadasfollows:
There is hereby adopted by the City, for the purposeuroseofprescribingregulationsgoverningconditionshazardoustolifeandpropertyfromfireorexplosionallofthose 'certain
codes, standards, recommended practices and manuals contained
in and set out. in volumes 1 through 16, inclusive, of the
National Fire Codes published - in .1983 b the Na 'y National Fare
Protection Association, and the provis*ions of same are herebyincorporatedhereinandmadeapartptof - th article byreferenceascompletelyandtothesameextentasifset out
at length in this article. (Code 1965 51703.010; Ord
1 4-2-70;
No. 26570, Ord, No. 327, S1, 7- 20 -72, Ord, No. 410, Sl 1 -27 -77
Section 2. The ordinance shall take effect and beinforcefromandafteritspassageandpublicationasprovidedblaw, • P ailed
y
Passed by the City Council
of the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota, this ' day
of - - - , 1983.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Ayes -
Nays -
ED0Ca0 V
T0: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
RE: Budget Change - Watershed Assessments
DATE: May 12, 1983
In
PROPOSAL
It is proposed that a $34,310 budget transfer from the contingency account
be approved to finance the 1983 installment on the special assessments levied
by the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District for the Battle Creek
improvements.
Q A r vt%Dn1 IKr n
In 1982, the watershed district levied $133,189 of special assessments on 17
parcels of City -owned land. The interest rate on these assessments is 11.75/.
On April 1, 1982, the City Council directed the City Attorney to appeal these
assessments. Recently, property tax statements were received which indicate;
that the first -year installments total $34,306.58 on these assessments. I The
first -half payment is due May 31. If paid late, the penalty is 7/ beginning
in dune and increases by 1/ per month.
I contacted John Bannigan to determine if this ,year's installments can be paid
to avoid the late payment penalties. It is his opinion that our appeal of the
assessments would not be jeopardized provided we include a letter with our
payment indicating that the installments are being paid under protest.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that a $34,310 budget transfer from the contingency account
be approved to finance the 1983 installments on the special assessments for
the Battle Creek improvements,
DFF:1nb
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Engineer
DATEV. May 13, 1983
SUBJECT: Crestview Drive--Hudson Place
Water Main Extension
Project No. 82 -19
N- 1
Construction bids will be received and opened on-- 20, 1983. The bi.ddi '.ng
results and tabulation of bids will be distributed along with estimated project
cost information to the City Council at their regular meeting on May 23, 1983.
I f , after review of the cost information, the Council wishes to proceed with
the pro j ect,the bid from the lowest responsible bidder will be used as the
basis for the formulation of the assessment rates, along with estimates of
indirect costs for engineering, legal, admi n i strati ve and acquisition costs.
The assessment hearing should be held on June 23, 1983. If the assessment is
adopted by the City Council on this date, the property owners have thirty (30)
days therefrom to notify the City of their intent to appeal. On July 18, 1983
the appeal period will be near expiration and an analysis will be drafted for
consideration by the :Council .
The Council can then evaluate the project with respect to the number of appeals
and make a determination on the award of a construction contract.
We, therefore, recommend that the City Council accept the bids, direct the
preparation of the assessment roll and authorize the assessment hearing be
held on June 23, 19830
ic
NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Counc i 1 of Maplewood,
Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers of the Maplewood
Municipal Building, 1380 Frost Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota
at p.m. on June 23, 1983, to hear all persons concerning the
adoption of the assessment roll for Public Improvement Project
No. 82-1.19, Crestview Drive--Hudson Place Water Main Extension, and
to adopt the assessment roll as presented or amended. This
hearing is scheduled pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429.
The assessment roll as herein described is on file in the office
of the City Clerk.
Area to be assessed: Properties abutting Hudson Place
between Crestview Drive and
Sterling Street, and Crestview
Drive south of Hudson Place.
All persons who wish to be heard, or to object with reference to
this matter may present their cases at this hearing, either
orally or in writing. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of
any assessment adopted unless a written objection signed by the
affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the
assessment hearing.or presented to the presiding officer at the
hearing.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant
to M.S.A. Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon
the Mayor or City Clerk of the City of Maplewood within thirty
3 0 ) days after the adoption of the assessment and by filing such
notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service
upon the Mayor or City Clerk.
Under provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 435..193 to
435.195 the City may, at its discretion, defer the payment of
assessments for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years
of age
I
or older for whom it would be hardship to make the
payments. The procedures for applying for such deferment are
available from the City Clerk.
Dated this lst day of June, 1983,
Lucille E. Aurelius, City Clerk
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
RESOLUTION
ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, The City Clerk and City Engineer have presented the
final figures for the improvement Crestview Drive--Hudson Place
Water Main Extension, Project No. 82 -19,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the City Clerk and City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed
for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or
parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard
to cash valuation, as provided by law, and they shall file a copy
of such proposed assessment in the City Office for inspection.
FURTHER, the Clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed
assessment notify the Council thereof,
f
RESOLUTION
ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING
WHEREAS, the Clerk and the Engineer have, at the direction
of the Council, prepared an assessment roll for the construction
of the Crestview Drive--Hudson Place Water Main Extension,
Project No. 82 -19, and the said assessment roll is on file in the
office of the City Clerk;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 23rd day of June, 1983,
at the City Hall at p. m. to pass upon such
proposed assessment and at such time and place all
persons owning property affected by such improvement
will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference
to such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of
the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published
in the official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to
the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners of all
property affected by said assessment.
3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time, and
place of hearing, the general nature of the improve -
meet, the area proposed to be assessed, that the
proposed assessment roll is on file with the Clerk, and
that written or oral objections will be considered.
PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE
CRESTVIEW DRIVE - HUDSON PLACE
WATERMAIN EXTENSION
PROJECT N0. 82 -19
1.City Council to accept feasibilityb' 'P 1 ty study February 28,1983and ,set dates for Public Hearing
2.Public Nearing - -City Council orders plans March 14 1983andspecificationsorabandonsproject
3.City Council to approve plans and speci -April 25 1983
fi cats ons and Advertisement
for Bi ds
4.Advertise in Maplewood Review _AP ril 27 1983 a
May 4,1983
5.Advertise- in Constructionon Bul l eta n April 29,1983
May 6,1983
6.Receive and open bids May 2 0,1983
7.City Council reviews bids and sets date Ma y 23 1983
for Assessment Hearing
8.Advertise in Ma 1 ewood ReviewP June 1 & 8,_1983
9.Assessment Hearing June 23,1983
10.Award of Construction Contract July 18,1983
11.Commencement of construction .Jul y 25 1983
12.Completion df construction November 1,1983 .
r
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
DATE :
MEMORANDUM
City Manager
Asociate Planner -- Johnson
Plan Amendment (RL to BW)
2075 Prosperity Road
Director of Community Development
Mo -Tech Corporation
April 28, 1983
SUMMARY
Request
r IT
Actiorn b .G .I .
Amend the Land Use Plan from RL, lower density residential to BW, business ware-
housing.
Reason for Request
This proposal is in response to Council's city -wide downzonin 9 program. The
present zoning - -M -1, light manufacturing -- permits uses that are more intensive
than anticipated by the Land Use Plan.
Comments
The Land Use Plan, rather than the zoning ordinance, should be amended to
resolve the present inconsistency.
The existing use is compatible with the site and surrounding property. There is
no need to phase the use out over time, which would be the intent of downzoning
the property and classifying the use as nonconforming. The entire site is within
200 feet of property presently zoned or proposed (separate report) as R -1, single
dwelling residence property, which requires council to approve an change in usePPy9
or building structure. Since the presence of the M -1 zone does not pose a future
threat of incompatibility to the neighborhood, it should be retained to recognize
the existing business.
Recommendation
I . Approve the enclosed resolution (attachment one) revising the Land Use Plan from
RL, lower density residential to BW, business warehousing for 2075 Prosperity Road.
II.Amend the acreage chart on page 19 -3 of the Land Us e P
from RL to BW.
1 an to reflect the change
b
4 BACKGROUND
Site De
Size: approximately .5 acre
Existing Land Use: Tool and die shop constructed in 1971. They - manufacture metal
molds for plastic parts.
Sur-roundingng Land Uses
North: Single dwelling
East: Prosperity Road, across the street, a` 1 ar e tract of land partiall19py
developed for 6W, business warehouse use.
South: Abandoned railroad right -of -way. Across the right-of-y
dwe,l l i ngs . The abondoned right -of -way is proposed for use as a trail
for nonmotorized vehicles.
West: John Glenn Junior High School property.
Planning
1. Land Use Plan Designation: Present - -RL, lower density residential
Proposed - -BW, business warehouse
2. The proposed BW designation includes governmental and public utility buildings
and structures, storage and warehousing facilities, wholesale business and
office establishments, cartage and express facilitie radio and television
stations and other industrial uses of a lower-intensity-nature.
3. Zoning: M -1, light manufacturing .
Public Works
Water and sewer are available
ADMINISTRATIVE
Procedure
1. Planning Commissi recommendation following a public hearing
2. Metropolitan Council review for impact on metropolitan systems
3. City Council decision
mb
Enclosures
1. Resolution
2. Existing Land Use Plan
3. Property Li Nap
4 . M - 1 Zone
5. Acreage Chart Revisi
2_
Attachment 1
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council
Chambers in said City on the day of at 7:00 p.m.
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
WHEREAS, a proceedings for the amendment of the Maplewood Comprehensive
Municipal Plan entitled "Plan for Maplewood" has been initiated by City of
Maplewood for a change of Planned Use from RL, lower density residential to
BW, business warehousing ,for the following generally-described area:
Commencing at a point 139.9 feet east of west line and 151.6
feet south of north line of lot 3, thence south 92.32 feet to
beginning thence southeast at and to line 81 38 mn 25 Sec 138.38
feet thence ang right 120 20 min. 84 feet to west l i n e of road thence
southwesterl on said westerl 125.58 feet to southeast corner lot 3
thence westerly on southerly said lot 142.5 feet to east 1 i*ne of west
139.9 feet of said lot thence north to beginning (subject to 66 feet
easement) , all in. lot 3, Block 7, Sabin Garden Lots, - Section 15, Township
29, Range 22.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of the proposed amendment is as follows:
1. The City of Maplewood has a Comprehensive Municipal Plan entitled "Plan
for Maplewood" adopted pursuant to the proud s i ons of Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 670, Laws 1965 (the Muni ci pal Planning Act, Minnesota S_ tatutes
Annotated, Sections 462.351 to 462.364 thereof);
2. Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.355; Subdivision 2 and 3 thereof provide
for amendment of the Comprehensive Municipal Plan or of any section
thereof;
2. An amendment of the Comprehensive Municipal Plan ahs been proposed by
the City of Maplewood and referred to the Maplewood Planning Commission,
which held a public hearing on the 2nd day of May, 1983 pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, 462.355, Subdivision 2 thereof, notice by mail and
publication having been given, heard all who wished to be heard, con-
sidered all written and staff reports and analysis..
WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Planning Commission, having considered the testi
mony of those present, all written submissions to it and staff reports, recommended
approval of the amendment. -
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-
described plan amendment be approved on the .basis of the following findings of
fact:
q
1.The proposed change would not have any adverse effect on the Comp re-hens i ve Plan.
2.The proposed designation would be compatible with adjacent land uses.
3.The change recognizes that the existing use and zoning ati bl a with9arecomPthei .site'
Adopted this day of 19830
Seconded by Ayes --
STATE OF MINNESOTA } :,
COUNTY OF RAMSEY 'SS.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD }
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the
City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully comparedyptheattachedandforegoingextractofminutesofaregularmeetingoftheCityofMaplewood, held on the y
P e day of 1983, with the original on
f i 1 e i n my off i ce, and the same i s a ful 1, -true and compl ete transcri pt theref rominsofarasthesamerelatesto
Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the. City thisPydayof1983.
City C1 erk
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
X11
1/W
r w..Mill .
Act ,....... .,.,...: Q
wn
HIP
rp"
O
WWI
it / _ OI ' ' ""'' _ - - '
Lr1• y
J
r .
Attachment .2 Sherwood Glen
N LAND USE PLAN
Proposed for amendment to BW, business warehouse
10
jv
f `3
17 i a + 20 21 23 24 2 5 2 G °a 31 f3o & S .2 2
ZO ti
r it •iL .i. r r • .. . r L L w r •' !
q ' ' •
V
GQ G ° AV E CJ ,1`•'
uT ft`f `"
I'
T "
m
T
0
wT 'gr Ts __
I A.
a I _m
1 O ? G S
j—
JR. SIGH SCHOOL
4 3 Z j : •• o L 3 T Ico _ ..Y
Tot t Z3.s"' ice - - - - - - - _ 1 i \•
o
its 19 20 Z 1 2•, 2 Zg - Z5 2 c
ti. i; ° ZD t9 i8 11 i C i 14 I
QII no dam
q q
E3 U
am r -. Moto r r. r •w r wd w •.•• r r .4 • • . r.
131.3 .Z 1 5. t 1 .3 • ' j
y .
4 ... . 44 4 t . .4 Z
JOIN* • 034 f
a
JOSYJOHNGLENN-
r '
T 20 Z.ICo ..
r BASEBALL FIELDS -'
00 MO •. 2080TEi .. •
At
10 ''x'1 > ' +' •Q .
wJ
2 5 •.s - -..-
sow
4v ---wet 0
A --
lot N1 3
94o /i
top
lie
AV
i if
a /
o
r
dm 41w.oil /z 33 OT, 3
It 00-I N
IF qbNT
M
o Co
1
i
r '
4 +3
r1 r Ir , r .
f
N !r
dD 114
ei
f .
w Z 3 4 S G
r
r G25
er
i Q
c .
PROPERTY LINE MAP
attachment three WITH ZONING
I"
t
1
Sec. 36 -186. Permitted uses. .
In M -1 Light Manufacturing Districts, a buildin g may be erectedy
Attachment 4 or used, and a lot may be used or occupied for any of the follow
and no other 'p ; provided that, no use which is noxious or
hazardous shall be permitted:
a) 'Any use permitted in a BC Business and Commercial Dis-
trict and SC Shopping Center District, if the coup ' is satis-
fied that such use will not interfere with proper development
of the M -1 Light Manufacturing District, but not otherwise.
b) Wholesale business establishments.
c) Trucking yard or terminal
d) Custom shop for making articles or products sold at retail on {
the premise&
e) Plumbing, heating, glazing, painting, paperhan in roofing,g g g,
ventilating and electrical contractors, blacksmith shop, car-
pentry, soldering and welding shop.
f) Yard for storage, sale and distribution of ice, cool, fuel oil or
building materials.
g) Commercial place of amusement, recreation or assembly.
h) Bottling establishment.
i) Manufacturing as follows:
I) Canvas and canvas products.
II) Clothing and other textile products, not including man-
ufacture of textiles.
III) Electrical equipment, appliances and supplies, manu-
facture and assembly of, not including heavy electrical -
machinery.
IV) Food products, combining or rocessin of not includingPgg .
meat and fish. s
V) Jewelry, clocks, watches.
VI) Leather products, including luggage and shoes.
VII) Medical, dental or drafting equipment, optical goods.
VIII) Musical instruments.
IX) Perfumes, pharmaceutical products, compounding of rub -
ber products and synthetic treated fabrics, not includ-
ing rubber and synthetic processing.
X) Small products from the following previously prepared
materials:Cork, feathers, felt, fur, glass, hair, horn, paper,
plastics, shells.
XI) Tool, dye and pattern making, and similar small ma-
chine shops.
XII) wood products, including furniture and boxes.
j) Carpet and rug cleaning.
k) Laundry, dry cleaning or dyeing plant.
I) Laboratory, research, experimental and testing
m) Any use of the s general character as any of the above-
permitted uses, when authorized as a special exception by
the city council
n) Accessory use on the same lot with and customaril y inciden-
tal to any of the above - permitted uses. (Code 1965, § 909.010;
S
IB. Plan Amendment: 2075 Prosperity Road (Mo-Tech)
ft Secretary Olson read the notice of public hearing. The proposal is
to amend the plan from RL to BW.
Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment
on the proposal.
Frank McGinley, 2044 Prosperity Road, reviewed the history of the tenants
in the building. He also commented on the use of property in the area.
He questioned what BW was. He said when the building was constructed the
people in the neighborhood were inform it was light industry.
Frank Sanders, Albert Lea, Minnesota, former owner of, the building,
said the property was zoned light industrial- when the building was
constructed, there was a public hearing and it was approved by the City
in 1972 or 1973.
Mr. McGinley questioned i f * the property south of Burke was designated
as open space or can warehousing be constructed on that property.
Secretary. Olson said the comprehensive plan designates the property
for BW. On the 1973 there was a strip of open space land between the
homes and the Ryan Equipment building. A public hearing was held when
the plan was' changed to 43W and all residents were notified.
i Mr. McGinley also questioned what was going to happen to the abandoned
Soo Line property.
Secretary Olson said there is a bill in legislature that would authorize
the DNR to acquire the right -of -way to develop a trail. Any property not
use may be sold to abutting property owners.
Chairman Axdahl closed the public hearing portion of the meeting.
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend that the
City Council approve the resolution revising the Land Plan from RL,
lower density residential to BW, business warehousing for 2075 Prosperity
Road and amend the acreage chart on page 19 -3 of the Land Use Plan to reflect
the change from RL. to BW
Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl,
Barrett, El l efson, Fischer, Hejny, Pel l i sh, Prew, Si gmundi k, Whitcomb
s
r Z
J-
T0: City Manager
FROM: Building. Official
SUBJECT: Appendix E-- Sprinklers
DATE: May 13, 1983 -
a
f w-
Proposal
Act" . on b
Dat
Adoption of Appendix E (attachment one) , by reference to the State Building
Code. Adoption of Appendix E would permit the city to requi re the installation
of sprinkler systems in new construction, additions and with a change in the
type of occupancy, where such sprinkler systems are not now required. Attach-
ment two describes the types of occupancies affected. Attachment three gives
examples of how Appendix E would have affected three buildings in Maplewood
if they were built under Appendix E.
Authority
Minnesota State Statutes, 1980 Section 299 F Ol l Subd. 4 prohibits municipalities
from establishing requirements in excess of the Uniform Building Code. Appendix E
was developed by the state to allow municipalities to establish uniform additional
standards above and beyond the basic provision of the State Building Code.
Pur
Adoption of Appendix E has advantages to . the city and building owner.
l . Increased fire protection.
This amendment is highly endorsed by the fire marshal's office and our
three fire departments. (See attachment four.) Sprinklers provide increased
protection for life and property.
2. Reduces property losses.
Attachment five shows the property loss savings that occurred with
sprinkler systems in Edina and Duluth. -
A, fi ve -year study of insurance losses by Factory Mutual shows buildi
without sprinklers had nine times greater losses than spri nkl ered buildings. In
a comparison of two Edina apartment bui l di n.gs ,one spri nkl ered and the
other not sprinkl ered, the spri nkl ered 13 -story building suffered
41,000 loss and no deaths. The unspri nkl ered four - story bui l sqi g, which
had heat detectors and an alarm system, suffered $70,000 loss d two dead.
s
Minnesota Mining (3M) states that 98% of their industrial fires were
suppressed without fire department personnel in buildings with sprinkler
systems i notal 1 ed. The balance of 2% were shelving and other hidden areas.
3M building 220 6th floor l oss was 2 112 million . One -third of the floor
was damaged by fire. Prior to this fire they chose not to install
sprinklers in the total building at a cost of 3/4 mi l 1 ion dollars. After
the fire, all office buildings in their system not previously spri nkl ered
have had the systems installed.
3. 40lows more flexible construction.
Under the building code, the installation of sprinkler systems allows
larger allowable areas, additional stories and substitution of one -hour
fire resistive construction in some cases.
4. Cost savings to building owners
It could be possible, based on square footage and occupancy, to build a
required steel or masonry building of a certain. type of wood construction
with sprinklers installed, realizing cost savings. Other rep ui rements
are also lessened with sprinklers: travel distance to exits and the
elimination of required fire alarm systems in public b u i l d i n g s and apart-
ment buildings. Manual pul l stati ons result in unncessary false alarms
to the fire departments. The building owner benefits by a reduction in
insurance costs, often with a payback within 7 to 10 years, depending upon
the type of occupancy.
5. Reduces manpower needed for the fire stations
Manpower for firefighters during daytime hours is becoming increasingly
difficult to obtain due to increased commitments to work. The b u i l d i n g
owner, therefore, should take the responsibility of protecting his
property. Reduction in personal injury reduces manpower, since firefighters
man the medic vans as well.
This is an option, not a mandatory provision, based on local fire suppression
capabili Some municipalities will not adopt this appendix. Initial
construction costs would be increased. However, the benefit to the city in
maintaining a proficient level of fire protection in the face of additional
construction and restricted budgets supports the adoption of Appendix E.
Recommendation
Adopt the enclosed ordinance (attachment nine) which adopts the new Appendix "E"
to the State Building Code, requiring sprinkler systems.
i
ic -
Enclosures
4'
10 Appendix E.
2. Types of Buildings affected by Appendix E
3. Examples of applying Appendix E in Maplewood
4. Fire Marshal's memo
5. Property loss compari sons
6. Water and manpower requirements
7. Stateme of need and reasonableness
8. Report of the hearing examiner
9. Code amendment
Attachment one:APPENDIX E •-
Department of Admini straton
Building Codes and Standards .
Adopted Rules Governing Amendments to the State •6u11ding Code Emitted ProposedOptionalappendixEAutomaticFireSuppressionpponSystems
Rule as Adopted
2. MC'AR § 1.10020 Optional provisions for installation of on- premises fire suppression systems.
A. Purpose. "!•his rule a optional provisions for the inmallation of on- remise% fire % •p uppresein in newconstruction. it is intended to alleviate increasing demands for additional fire suppression re%ources by •i#itiwing a municipalityIt's adopt ths pptional provision% of this mile based on its local fire stippres%ion capahiliiic•.a
H. Mtinii;ipal option. 'lie sprinkler s }•stem reytiire•mcnt% in C. may he adopted without change ht• a muinamunicipal If they areadopted. the requirements are applicable throughout the ninnicipalit} new htiiltlings.attditions it) shiiilclii • s Ictr1i1ch111C4«ttpa11c} classification iti changed. . nl t tiillin.
C. Requirement%. Automatic sprinkler systems must he inmalled and maintained in operable condittc•tiP:iiic} s.•l:t.sific:i titnti listed lit 1. - 1_'. 'phis r•ytiiremcitt is in :icidilitn
ti in htiilclings in the
other miniitum requirements set in the state buildingcode. The height and area increases provided #* in sections 06 and Sol of the Uniform Building ade•, as abuildingaxlebegado in the state . tf# are applicable .
1. (Troup A -1 occtipancle%.
2. Group A -2 occupancies with an occupant load of 3(X1 or more.
3. Group A -2.1 occupancies.
4. Group B -1 service stations with 30X) or more gro%% sq. ft. of :area, not including canopies.
5. Group B -1 parking garages with 5.000 or more gross sq. ft. of area.
6. Group R - 2 offices and petit -% condary cla%srooins with 8.5M car more gross %q. ft. o • ' • iheight. of area or 1hrec• or more . Ic n
7. Group B -2 retail. warehouse. or manufacttiring areas with',(HX) or more gro%% sy. it. of area or three or more - height. mt stories in
8. Group E - I and E - 2 occupancies with 8.54) or more gro sq. ft. in area or two or more o ' • - ' •' • .tilt ricti in height, except forminteradditionsthatdonotincreasetheoccupantloadorsignificantlyincreasethefireload.
9. Group E - occupancies with an occupant load of 30 or mart:.
10. Group H -4 occupancies with 3.(XX) or more gross tiy. ft. of area.
11. Croup R -I apartment houses with 8,5t1() ear Mor lull%% 1y. it. o area or with t!ve•Iliii ti • • •nits on ihtc.c or ntire floctrti.except that when the) are not required by Uniform Building C ode. sections 1807 or 1907, or other rovisions building code. automatic sprinkler systems within dwelling tinitti in apartment •
p c f the ~late
fi p cot oc-ctip:incics are considered complete whenprotectionisprovidedinailhabitablerooms. Building official%. in concurrence with their fire chiefs may accept alternate
systems t 1i which have fire protection cap:ihilities equivalent to systems which comply w'the Uniform Building Code. p } ith Standard 3X- i of
U. Group R -1 hotels and motel% with 8,5(. or more gross sq. ft. of area or %vi •q ith gu rooms on three or more fluorti.
w
KEY: PROPOSED RULES SECTION — Underlining indicates additions to existing ule language. "g angudge. outs indicatedeletionsfromexistingrulelanguage. If a prupowd rule is totally new, it is designated "all new maw 'I.'• ADOPTEDRULESSECTION — Underlining indicates additions to proposed rule language. eke ouis indicit eletions fromproposedrulelanguage.
CITE 7 S.R. 1519) STATE REGISTER, MONDAY, APRIL 18, 1983 PAGE 1519
Attachment two: Types of Buildings affected by
Appendix E
Group A Occupancies are dining rooms, drinking establishments, auditoriums
and other places of assembly where people gather. All occupancies in this
category,wi th an occupant load over 300 persons, are requiredred to be - s riqp nkl ered
by Appendix E.
Group B Occupancies are primarily offices, retail stores, warehouses and m anu -
facturing areas. Occupancies in this category will now require sprinklers9yq i .e.
an _office building with 8,500 gross square feet of area or three or more stories
must be spri nkl ered. Under present code a wood frame office building could
be built with 8, 000 square feet, two stories in' height and not be spri nkl ered.A small retail store of 2,000, or more gross square feet or three or more
stories in height would require sprinklers. A retail store of wood frame
construction of 2,000 gross square feet is not required to be spri nkl ered under
the present code.
Group E Occupancies are primarily educational facilities and facilities for
day care purposes. The requirement in this category does not change appreciably,
Group H Occupancies are hazardous areas, handling of hazardous and flammable
liquids, wood working establishments, areas where loose combustible fibers
or dust are manufactured, and spray painting shops.
Group H -4 is a repair garage with an allowable area of 5,100 square feet in
type V construction. Appendix E would require sprinklers for 3,000 squarefeetormoreofarea.
Group R -1 Occupancies are hotels and apartment houses. Under present code
apartment houses of frame construction would allow 5,000 square feet and two
floors. Appendix E requires spri nkl ers for 8,500 gross square feet or with
dwelling units on three or more floors regardless of type of construction --
wood frame, masonry, etc.
Group R -1 Occupancies hotels and motels under Appendix E would require
sprinklers if the bui 1 di ng had 8,500 or more gross square feet or with guestq9
rooiRs on three or more floors,
s
v
3
t
y
s
Attachment Three: Examples of applying Appendix E in Maplewood
Holiday Inn
Hol i'day Inn was built in 1977, has 29,500 square feet per floor with a total
of 59,000 square feet.
Gods did not require fire supression system. Appendix E would require the
system at 8,500 square feet.
s
Commerci al -area of Holiday Inn has 16, 674 square feet on one floor.
The Code in effect when this motel was constructed allowed 10,100 square feet
of area and with sprinklers permitted doubling of area to 20,200 square :fee.t.
Therefore, the commercial area of Holiday Inn is sprinklered to accommodate
the number of square feet in this area.
Appendix E would require sprinklers for all occupancies with occupant load
over 300.
rwft; .—I/n+ Tnn
Cricket Inn has 116 units, 4 floors, 45, 569 square feet total with 11, 367 square
feet per floor.
The structural elements of this building are noncombustible, therefore, the
present building code would allow 27,000 square feet, 4 stories high, without
a sprinkler system.
The recommendation of the Fire Marshal's Office required sprinklers, thus it
became a condition of the Design Review Board and Council. The motel is
spri n kl ered.
Appendix E would require sprinkler system ,at 8,500 square feet or 3 floors in
height.
Cmovn1A Tnn
Emerald Inn has 68 units, five floors with approximately 30,000 square feet
including the penthouse.
Building Code today would allow Emerald Inn to be built as a 4 -story motel
without sprinklers. However, the building is fully s pri nkl ered, due to the
five stories, to comply with the Code.
Appendix E would require sprinklers at second floor because of area.
p
Attachment four
April 25, 1983
MEMORANDUM
To: Building Inspector Marge f
From: Fire Marshal A. C. Schad
Subject: Appendix "E" Sprinklernkler S stemsPy
r
Thesnew Appendix "E" to the State Building Code is now completed and hasbeendocumentedintheStateRegister, volume) Number 42 dated April19830p 18'
It would be advantageous that this Appendix "E" be included in the 1982 BuildingCode, w uldngCwhichwouldrequireanOrdinanceapprovedb .Council action.by Council
appendix is highly endorsed by the City's f ire services f ram the tee
contra departments as well as this office, "and we urg our department'susupport and approval
g y p s
pp in obta the adoption required by law*
We recommend your department proceed forward in obtaining the r '
r proper OrdinanceforCodeenforcement.
ACS: J s
cc Director of Public Safety
Fire Departments
dw
CppY
Attachment five
CiPARIN
M IDDR AP
6730 %qMDON AVII3LJE
4 at-wies
Approx. 10 years o18
HeaC Throughout
Type I Fire Resistive
Apartment
Within Dwelling Unit
Living Roan/Hallway
Rocn UroccuPied)
Clothes Basket
Ignition Source Unknown)
Occupant Enterirg
Tb contents, Hall Closet
7b Carpet/Interior Sall
Door to Corri3or Open
Zb Public CArri3oz
Interior Finish
Rated Less than 25)
To Adjoining Apartulmmt
Open fir)
2 Dead
70,000*00
6 let4i. es 24
2 La3c3ets S Ien
3 anxes 7
EM%
Its
Life .
Property $1,000.00
WES 1 1ng ine men
J
7151 YORE{ AVENM 9OM
13 stories
10 years old
ON I Fire Resistive
O=AN=Apartment - Elderly
FIRE U=TIO[J Within Dwelling Unit
FIRE AM Living Rom .
r Rom ied)
FIRE Plastic Decorative Wreath
Candle)
ALERT Sprinkler /Alarms
FIRE GROWM Tb Television Set Cabinet
Zb Wall Rang ings, Picture
names
SPREAD OF FIRE CHEM= '
Sprinkler
dp
f
Its
Life .
Property $1,000.00
WES 1 1ng ine men
J
COMPARISON
Two Duluth Buildin Fires
222 East Second Street
Senior Citizen A
T I Fire Resistive
1
Sen i of Apa rtment s,
Within Dwellin Unit
Livin Room
Occupied)
Papers (Pipe)
Smoke Alarm
Smokers. Pipe to
West Junior Hi
Stories_ Ole
wwft, CCE STRUCTI ON —aw T 1 Fire Resistiv
dxeb— OCCUPANCY School
em FIRE LOCATICE School Office
FIRE ARZE -- of f ice
4MM"M FIRE SZ-IRT
mw— ALERT- aw
Wooden Desk
Custodian arrivin
for work
newspaper -FIRE GROVITH Desk
To Ma rack To Of f ice furniture
To Overstuffed Office gutted
Chair
Spread of Fire Fire checked by
checked closed office door
Sprinkler Smoke spread through
school by way of ven
s
swam $110 00013000000LOSS
do
Zia
I
r
Highliihts of Fire in the V.S.
A 26 -urge booklet that i a
comptehensive study of deaths,
injuries, dollar loss and inci-
dents on national, state and local
levels ,reveals some intere3ting
facts &boat !America's fire
xperfence.
in order of severity, the five
most dangerous occuos:a for
fire f rghters are manufacturing,
basic fiIustry, storage, stores
and offices, and vacant and con-
struction sites.
The fire death problem is espe-
cially serious in large cities and
rural %o m m- unities . Medigm sized
cities have the lowest fire death
rates. The death rates in most
rural areas are the highest,
higher even than large cities.
Rural areas and big cities have
higher dollar losses per capita
from fire than do mid --size cities.
Coos e s of the report are available40
from the Federal Emergency Manage-
ment Agency, 500 C Street S.W. ,
Washington, D.C. 20472
Sori.nkler3 Re3uce Prooerty Losses
A recent five - year study by
Factory Mutual System shows that
dollar losses due to f ices in
buildings without sprinklers are
nine - time3 greater than losses in
sprinklered buildings Fires in
buildings wi sprinklers averaged
a $32,000 loss, compared to a
201,000 loss in non- sprinklered
vrooe: tie3.
Tirebu3 Game Bro hares out o Prin
The country's fire service has
succeeded in haling vi leo game
brochures for " s irebug" taken out
of print. The game_ has been
changed to,an' es :a *e gams using
the five -story ma 2;.. The saver-.
t i s i ng copy has be_eln modified to
reflect the esca : roan the burn -
f ng bu i ld i ng theme;.
The coot' originally encouraged
participants to Skillfully burn
the building and es`aoe de
Promotion of the gamme brought a
general uproar from fire service, -
law enforcement and the insurance
industry. The Minnesota distribu-
tor of the game agreed to remove
the product from retail shelves
following contact wi the
President of the International
Association of Arson
Investigators, Minnesota Chatter,
Bruce Ryden,
Los Angeles Sues to Recover Fi re-
fighting Costs
In what Los Angeles city attorneys
believe to be an unorecedented
case, the city has files suit
against a plastics company to
recover the costs of fighting a
fire at its plant. The city con-
tends the company was grossly
negligent in the storage of highly
flammable materials on its pram-
ises and had failed :o correct
legal violations after being order
to do so. Contending that the
hazardous storage was the cause of
the fire in May, 198 Los Angels
seeks to recover $200,411 in
expenses plus $l million in puns
tive damages The :ompanv already i
has pleaded-no contest and paid 3
4.000 fine for viol: ion of the
fire code.
Attachment six
yam 1 . t • • • STW ,-
lied f n a fog pattern should
cne llcn of water per minute ,Tlear e t i tally • 1 c feet of fire involving
harve ling to extinguish 100 cubic ,
enough O ext i i sh a fire in two floors of
t ibles. bus, too be able to ,
ordinary require:
a 1500 square foot hone (8 f cort ceilings)
MO X 2 = 3000
3000 X 8 .= 2400
24000 : 100 = 240 GPM requir
allcns r minute Per 100 cubic
suppression experts = 3 or 4 g •pe hFireiGa1ponditars , which a11ow's for suc
ire extin i.srnent under pr actfeetforfread the difficulty in applying water
s as ings which aid f ire sp , , to bethings the theoretcal form
eat of the fire, as required by
tai redly on the s
valid. .
over the hoses is related t the
r of fire f i gh to r s requ i red too mane ,
The followi are ainvntnun fire fighter
size of the base streras. The., 3
si
requirements an hose streams.
100 GPM - 2 -
250 GPM - 34
e of 15 gallons of water per
r inker head delivers an average ,g aboAtypicalsp = aniZatioas end cater that abo
the data of various not i onal o g with onem,nute, an3 buildings are extinguished
hs of all fires in r inklered fourths
s r inkler h going off . ads gcartwoP •
nand Dec is ions and rat ions.
Warren, Fire Attack 1
R ' an 60 Battery March Street
1973, ,
Bastal,
National Fire Protection Associate ,
mass . , 02110, pg . 81 f • •
Fire Stream Practices, 19808
ire Service Training Association,International F versit , Stillwater, Oklahoma,
lications, Oklaharna State Un_ Y
Fire Protectionan Pub
74078, P9. 158.
r
V
1
l
i
ra
s
Attachment seven
STATE OF MINNESarA
a DEPARTMEW of A174MI STRATION
In the Matter of the Propos
Rules of the Depar Lment of Administration STS OF WM Aim
Governing Amerdnents to the State Building
ade entitled Proposed Optional Appendix E -
atic Fire Suppression Systems
Z.
Zhe above* captioned rules are a proposed optional ap<aend i x chapter to
the State Building code which authorizes municipalitiesties to require on -sitePa
fire suppress ions stems in certain occupansYpacies.
The proposed rules are needed to authorize municipalities to acb t fireP
suppression reVirements, established through information obtained from
nationally- recojnized experts, to a rotection level higherPg than currently
a u thor i zed . MN Sta is . 1980, Section 29976011, Su 'bd, 4 prohibits
municipalities f ra n establishing requirments in excess of the requirements of
the Uniform Building Cm3e. adopted pursuant to M Statse 1980 Section 16.83 to
15.867 (State Building The adoption of rules establishing standards
for additional on site fire suppression systems is necessary to rmitYP'e
municipalities to obtain standards of fire suppression capabilities not in
conflict with provisions of the State Building Cc de when i t ' s determined ' nrml ed by
the municipalilty that additional rovisions are necessary and cost effective.P y
The agency's authority to promulgate the Pr Fes` o ed rules is contained in
M '7-Stats e (1980) St 16.85 and 16.86.
The expansion of fire suppression and revention ca b = i s isPpaie
necessary for public safety in buildingsildis located i n expand i municipal* ties .x, ng
A primary torimern of rows an ici 1 i tes s '9 n9 Pa i to establish a balance of public
i
4
private sector financing for fire suppression rotect •protection in new buildings
where public sector funding liis havn9a been reached,
These rules are a reasonable approach to f ire suppression _ suP'P sion an the local
Level because resources for municipal firere de •-Pa departm are Iil ted to current
ibr reduced expenditure levels. The level of fire fi ghting area prevention
1provided is exclusively a local determination. The ieoorxarnic €eas i bl I ty and
reasonableness of adopting uniform regulations in excess of •the State Building
Code must be determined by the municipality providing the services and those
bearing the expense,
Zhe establishment of i oral rules •op les for adaptlon without change are
based on a study of nationwide trends of the fire • s ofiresuppressioncapablllte
municipal fire departments. This rovides munisiP palities a method to
establish reasonable additional standards based on local b' •capa llitles.
During the 1981 session of the Minnesota i slature * a b'9 , 111 was
i ntraduced rmi tti local ui -Pe ng is of government to enact ordinances requi. ring
on -site fire suppression stems as theyy deemed appropriate. The legislation
Passed the House and was considered by the Government rations Comm iOpe t tee of
the Senate, where testimony was offered in sition to 'the bell. One issue
of opposition was that the un i f omi t provided 'y p ded for in the State Building Code
would be destroyed and cues i rs developers •lopers and builders would be subjected
a vast array of requirements, Tie cha i Man of the Sena to can, *1 t tee
r ded that all affected partieses • att - ,Pa to resolve the it- i f f e r enees
through the rule making rocess of the Mn' ' ,.n9 P lnstrative Procedu =.Act.
Director of the Building codes .and Standards Division subsequently
appointed a committee to review the Issues involyed and recaannend how theyi
Paw 2
might be best resolved. Zhe listing of Catinittee rs is attachedshed to this
t statement. • (Dchibit 1) The cmil i ttees first meeting was on Jul 16 1983Y and
of ter a ser Les of 16 meetings the f inal (4th) drat t of the alpropas was
aampleted an May 26, 1982. Duringi the aommi ttngee deliberations t7it was
race ived from many resource rsons including .,P'e ng fire protection engineers, fire
M -
de rtment achi n istrative rsonne •pe 1, meChan cal engi the concrete
industry, sprinkler industr , insurance industry, y, oarrmi ttee members and
others. Several i of oraa t i onal meetings were held with architects, building
developers, building owners and managers, buildi officials and others, ers, and
draft copies were revised following input f ra n ooncerned Pe rsons.
7he consensus of the cvrcinittee was to prise an ional apP:a'e
Chapter to the State Building code that could '9 be adopted, without change, at
the descret ion of municipal governments, Similar to the existing aippex
chapter D relating to building security. A measure of uniformity would thusY
be maintained so that persons affected would quickly whetherether or not
the appendix chapter had been adopted by any given municipality, so that
structures would be designed and constructed accordi 1 . 7he ca n' ttn9Yiee
believes this approach will be a long term solution to existi ng and future
problems.
Although Minnesota Statutes do not mandate that municipalities rovidepap
fire protection for their citizens, man municipalities are endeavoriyPa n9 to
maintain a of i ci ent level of fire •Pr protection n the face of additional
coqstruction and restricted budge due to cutbacks in resourg ces
Kmicipalities firmly believe that ovidi for ,
a .
providing built - f suppression
systems in new construction, the can maintain a reasonable fYedegreeo
protection without buildin additional .ng ca1 fire stations, obtaining new equipment
and supplies, and recrui additional .i'g personnel. Ardi tonal resources would
1%ft, w ft
also be necessary, do rdvide i rP ng trainingning of personnel, mai ntanerCe and
4 operation of equipment, and buildi s• .ng as well as additional fire fighter
salaries,7he cost of providing acid i tional services involves both 'ins t al
Capital outlay phis continuous r ram ma intPog anenoe cos is . The Tresno
California Cron i cle attachedhed to this statement Exhibit #2) supports the
etfecti veness of this i ti iposon • In spite of Considerablederable growth n area and
population, fire department staffing, iequipment and •P' number of stations was not
substantially increased,
Recently adopted OSHA regulations impose additional training
requirements and safety rov i s iprovisions •Y _ P which places additional burden
on the ability of municipalities to provide fire protection service within
reasonable budget levels. The added training regegtlirements iaay be a deterrent
to obtaining volunteer fire fighters due to increased acxnni t mnt s on volunteer
fire fighters time • Service of full time i d fire fighth 'pa g to r s i s beyond the
budget 1ismitatic ns of mc)st municipalities 'pa in Minnesota. OSxA Subpart L.
F'''63eral Register Vbl. 45, No. 179 Sept. 12 1980 'p't . Sec. 1910.156. A listingsung of
paid and volunteer fire departments in the state is attached to this statementonet
Exhibit #3)0
The Minnesota Fire Chiefs Associati has, far Ye ars, advoca the
extensive utse of aut matic rinkler systems in buildingsd'SP y it ings too control or
ext i ngu ai sh fires and reduce r r t .p oPe y drainage losses. In addition they are
r
co6cerned about the Life safety of building owc nts f ire departmentmentpar
personne who must enter buildings to suppress fire ' -uPP s. Statistic show that
multiple death losses are very rare in buildingsildis i with - tcrnaticn9
s
i
sprinkler systems throughout,Y Property losses are greatly reduced in
buildings protected throughout automatic sprinkler-systems.Manpower needs
are reduced dramatically when bldis ar •ng a protected with automatic
PboLlb A
spi inklers. CUTparlsohs ' of fires in ra -ble buildings with and withouthout
sprinklers ,are attached to this statement (MKhibit #4) . Edina - Apartmend
Building fires; Richfield Bub Center; Duluth, Apartment Building,
T installation of sprinklers sterns is r n'y ecg i zecl by the present
building cede as providing additional fire safety rotectiyprotection by allowing
liarger allowable areas, additional stories and 'subs ti tut ion for I hour fire
resistive construction in sane cases.' Sane cost saving can be realized when
the cede is researched and applied to a i ven designg
A Conce has been expressed by multi-family housing developers, thatY Pe r
increased initial oasts will be ',a deterrent to development of mach
lower and moderate intone housing, Experience has shown that there is much
less clean up and re-construction of ter a fire in a s inklered apartmentP'r
building, thus allowing re- occupancy of units quickly after a fire. 7he early
reoccupancy results in additional pay -back of initial investment. Tenants are
benef i tted by the additional safety provided automatic _ Y P by sprinklerP
protection, In the proposed rule an exception to 24CAR Section 1.10020.0.11,
was incorporated to allow acceptance of sprinklerinkler s sterns that would .providerovidePYP
protection at minimal to
Water supply demands for extinguishment of fires with hose lines are
much greater than when automatic s r inklers are used. Fires usually rowPy9
tap idly in their early stages, delayed alarms o 1 times aretagylongresponsetu
sm.riaus obstacles to fi steextinguishment. On -site extinguish s ms99i_ Y
provide an alarm when . the sprinklerinkler s s tem i s actuated 'P Y ed by beat" fire,
s
thus providing an early alarm as well as containment or e x t i n R shne nt of the
fire.
Page S
ana ll f i res are usually fought with 1 -1 /2" hose lines requiring 2 men
r
per line. larg ires ire 2 " hose line '1/2 s needing 3 or 4 men per hose
line. The majority of fires set off a max imun of 2 sprinkler heads with a
46ischarge 15 to 20 GM. mater and manpower requirementsrements are attached t •o this
stAtement (Exhibit #5).
r
Fire resistive construction is required the code in man instances,y ces.
E*erienve by fire and building departments, and investigations after fires
has shown that fire resistive assemblies have failed dur i fires. Sxe of
the factors causing failure are as follows:
1. Many. sub- contractors are involved and none of tl has total
responsibility to assure oompliancae. 7bese sub-contractors
include ceiling installers, electricians insulators ( thermal and
acaousti sheet metal and ventilation installers, plum!xebrs,
can un i ca t i ons people and others
2. Frequently, inspectors and plan revi personnel are not
sufficiently experienced and trained to detect all deficiencies in
oarnplex assemblies.
3. Many building departments are understaffed, due to budget
constraints.
4. ling of buildings often gives rise to the- useJsubstitute
materials and as a result ce i li 9n s or walls are no er f ire
resistive, compart7nentation is negated,
Page 6
when fire v.Wession efforts are underway rArtments trust , be •opened
tc> gain access. In many instances this will cause the fire to spread from its
original aource . Fire fighters advance uses into stairways and corridors to
attack fires. When this occurs, the fire resistive character of such vital
A 4.
life safety areas is defeated. Autanatic sprinkler protect i06 tends to offset
tie hazards which prevail when fire resistive assemblies have been ne g ated.
Minnesota cities are developing a pmttern of maintaining a manpower
level in their fire departments which is minimally sufficient to extinguish
the average size Muse fire, When the provisions of proposed Appendix E,
based on occupancy classification and hazard, are combined with a minimally
sufficient fire department an acceptable level of f ire extingui
capabi is achieved. -- -
Group A Occupancies (public assembly) a xcjua ting 300 or more persons, .
normally have large open areas rather than small compartments Compartments
help contain a fire. Fire In a large compartment can readily defeat a small
fire fighting force. Sprinkler protection is needed in order to contain an
incipient fire. This reduces the c hanoes of panic in a large crowd attempting
to flee a growing fire and allows a smaller fire fighting force to extinguish
the f ire.
The square footage limitation for Group8 service stations is
rstricted true to the nature of the ocac Flammable and combustible
2jcquids greatly increase the fire loading in these occupancies.. Even in a
r
wall square footage flammable or onmbusti ble 1 iqui ;± f ire can
t
r
readily overa m* an average fire fighting force.
Page 7 =
Group '8 (parkirig garages) , tuns i sti rig of large open areas, 'do not
allow storage other than autacnabi les ,7he spacing of the autamobi les and the
fact that fires in an au are normally contained within the engine or
passengers r tment prov i cue some deg of assurance •Ini n9 a f i re
Isolated* Due to _this fact the square footage limitations for_ parking a ragarages
teas es tabl i shed at 5,000 square feet. 7his is more liberal tKan the Group 8-1
rvice stations due to the lesser hazard.
Group B-2 (offices and po6t- secxmdary classroans) , were assigned a
square footage limitation of 8500 square feet. These occupancies are divided
into fairly small cacm r tnents which con .
F
Fa containn a moderato fire loading of normal
oambustibles. Due to this fact, the oaRmi ttee det •ermined that the square
footage limitation tould be increased above the nor e restricti r eclu i t amen is
of the occupancy groups previously .p y lfisted. Tte height of a bulldi ng is a
critical factor , ardless •Reg of square footage , the aver fire taeagepa r tent
wOuld still require additional equipment and man •manpower to gain access to
buildings of over two stories
Zte Group B-2 (retail, warehouse and manufacturing Occupancies) , were
assigned a square footage limitation of 2000 are feet. These types of
occupancies rormally contain a high loading of normal combustibles, densely
s for ed in an open area,
Group -1 and E-2 Oacu ies (K -gned a arePncschools) were assigned
footage limitation of 8500 u •sq sre feet. Zte characteristicsos
oqf,-
hese
upanci es are simi 1 ar to Group 8--2, of f icoes and Post- seoor0a classrDarns
K- schools are %J"LVL ised of smaller caarnnar tments which P1chelpcontainafire.
Page 8 4W
Group H Occ i es (repair garages) were assigned a maximum square
footage limi tation of 3000 square feet. H4 Occupancies have weldi and
tutting operations, as well as other open flames used in areas where flammable
1 quidsds are stored and dispensed. used . H-4 Occupanciesies have •Pe a greater probability
of fire with such fires being more severe in nature due highly9tothe g ly
f 1 ammabl a and t]ombu s t i ble contents.
he Group R -1 Occupancies (apartment houses hotels and motels) were
assigned a maximum square footage limitation of 8500 square feet. Zbe
characteristics of these occupAcies, are similar to Group B-2 offices and
poSt-secondary cl a s s r cams as to pampa r tme nt a t i on aw bu s t i ble contents.
R -1 Occupancies, where the occupants are sleeping, creates a life loss
pc al not associated with 8-2 occupancies. Hotel and motel occupancies
also present the problem that sleeping occupants are not familiar with their
surroundings which also increases the life loss potential. R -1 Occupancies
require a high level of fire department manPcwe r for evacuation and rescue
purposes,
All testimony reee i ved at the hearing will be given due cans i der at ion
and i noorporated into the proposed rule if determined necessary arO reasonable*
r
i
r
Date:
7
Page 9
VCD- e3 -4v2 -M
M7T ar K
c C.2 Or A Tr& MW
tc EVAPTMZW Cr ACKINI ATUM =
ptTILiI? ODES AM SMMAM DIMS
hn the lbtter of the jft 3bum of
the Dope rt t of Asti nistration Quern- lCt a"
IN is to oe State Bu i ld ireg QoOe 71R ING ?.704 DMghtifledPaOptionalAppendixt
Autcnatic lire ress 9ysts.
tie above-"titled rttf cme on for hearing before Hearing ftwiner peter
C. Zrickew of the state Office of Aftinistrative Bearings at 9 :30 Bone on Med-
y, Jamary S. 19'x3 In 408 of the Metro re Building, SeV+tnth Band
Hobert Streets, !t. ftul, Kiw*wts. tarry D. Starns, 8prcis1 Assistant Attaraw
rey aerwrsl, ]ot A&inisttation Building, SO Sherburrne Avwux, st. loin, Kirte-
ata 55155 red an behalf of the Building Oades and Itandards Division
of the Hi Dwe rent of Aftinistration *wreinafter 'CD"). Richard
Assistant Dim for the Dm, i es Rein, Deputy Chief of the U
Piro Daps rtarnt, aid f ivert Brndr i ck son, Building Official for the Ci ofty
lei ci f i e ld , red Bend trsti f ied for the DIM in ffWx t of the • PT WV49 ed rules.
fie N acing oontireued Until all interested groc pa of persons bad had an c;; ar
tUni ty to testify concerning the adoption of the rulas.
Skis Seport shall be a" it able for tev ev to ail sffsctsd Wividuals upon
roq %pest for at least five working days before the agency takes any further • ac
t ion an the rule (s) . pursuant to Kim =tat. 9 14.16 (148 2) , the Cwn i ss ionet
of the E*partarnt of Administration 01011 if he prepares to adapt the rule as
reaaarnaea herein. stmt the rule, together with the lete luring rewrd
to the Attonvy Goaral and shall be for notifying pera w s who hove
iMicatad that they Wirb too be natifisd of Duch filing. If the 0=issiamr
wakes Cha ages In Vve rule o tte r than tho'" esaddivid Bert in, he *All su=it
the rule with the CCaplete Maring record to the Chief Bearing U miner for a .
90v Ow of the Cl anges prior to v*mI tting it to the Attorney Oweral for
Time
Based Won 011 the t:es t incM a txh i bi ts, Mend written Cmwnts, the Near
bcasir*r Bakes the follorirg:
FMI or
On l 1952 ave M filed =thee foucwirg am rmeats With -the
Chief *&ring wirer:
a) A aopY of ave plopmw rules.
ib) 'lyre Order for Staring.
s (C) a lbtice of Waring praQosed to be iMARAId . .
t4) A Styteeent of the momber of rsans e .
hearing
Pe xrc.'tsd to Br
t
ewed .
nd es t ine ted length of the Agency s prerse an.
2e On Dsairsbrr i, 1982 a 1bt i ce of Sear ing and a Copy prey
rules veTe publishmd at 7 hate %gister 23, pp. 886489* = •
3• 4 + r ?, 1192. the SM aailsd the lbtioe of sear( to all r-Pe
ons 0r iatiors *!o bed n9ister0d their names with the IM for the pus
or
s
pe of iring ooti t.
Attachment eight
4. an Deos6er I 19a2, the SM filed the following dOmsolTlts with the
lba ring ftminer s
tai 2w fttice of ,hearing as oiledo
tba me Igercy is oerti f icstion that its selling list was
aocv rate and ompl ete •
cc) st,e Affi of !!s i 1 fng the llat ice to al i per e m a on '
the A"Incy's list. -
fdf 2W Statsnent of Hied and !reasonableness.
fey She noes of SM peramnel personnel who will represen 04
AqW y at the tea toge the r with the tomes of any other
w1 t>7esses solicited by the Agercy to aWea r an its behalf. -
tfI A copy of the State ftgistet cmtain the •Pr rsxlas.
s
e r. a a nu were m ilable for tIan at the DEf ice of A3ministrative
Ma r i ng s f rm the date of filing to the date of the hearing.
s. 7te record remained open through Uwary ?S, 1963 for the race ipt of •
written asacents and statements, the period baying been by orde of -_
the Bearing ftmi to ?D calendar days following the hearing.
is. statutory VAhority to adopt the rules is conta in Kinn.
stet. 6; i 6• es and mw asap. .
r
T. During the 1!61 legislative session a bill was intto6uoed permitting
local units of to sroct ordinarces requirirg on-site fire supFreem
sion systeas as was deewd app o ri.ats. this legislation passed the Hoge of
AEpreftntatives and we$ WrJidlred by the Owerrticntal Cperatians amittae of
the Senate, where testia6my in c csi tion to the bill was beard. bne issue
raised two that the unifomity pz,wi606 its the State auildirg would be
destroyed " designe developers and builders Mould be a bj w to a vast
array of requirownts if local Qowerromental units were allowed to pass their
own fire NPPmssien ordirnsr>rc+es. e Qaitan of the Senate Gittee twaae
teernded that all of fec-tsd Pa rties attenVt to resolve their differences through
the rule-asking process of the Admirti,s tea ti ve Procedure lrct.
she Direct= of the !wild im W" and Standards Division tl y
W; m inted a committee to r!" ow the Imes involved and nil bow they -
sight best be resol ved. 2e Omn i ttee first lint an lily 16, 1961 and t after -
a series of 16 amtings, the final (fourth) draft of the proposal was C=Vletad
an ray 26, 1982. Curing the cc dttee doliberations, input ways received fros
many resource persons, including ftre protection wVineers, fine &Parteent ad-
winistrative persomnel, sectwnicsl eMinrers, the concrete industry, sprinkler
industry, Insurance industry and committee smashers, aoocnq ottwrs. Several its-
formational Meetings wart bald with architects, building developers, building
avers and Managers, and building officials. Draft copies were rev iard f+ollw-
Ing input from ail of times oar>Ic:er d W i
r
r 1 Ihe DM Wcy comi ttee appointed by the Director of the SM was Soft pop of
the following persons:
s
In we lyricks+on, Amite fireetor 1ti 21 ids lily
S&I001 lbcil ities, Dept. of Associated General Clontracutes
Wmat ion
Oar Castetlard, Wilding Official Oxer lbGary
lbrth Starthrptez, lCHD Retired Piro Chief
210 Cie C IMS of the ccimai I " to PrCPCOe an optioml aen
ctapter to. the state Buildin %tdch mould be m-w-I&MYO ada - 0 without &&me* at
the dlwrvticn of smicipal rriments, sWlw to the existin : Chap-
ta 0 relatin to building wcurit A measure of mifomit would thn be
waintsin9d 80 that Pwrwm affected Mad quickly eam*rtain utattar of not the
ix chapter had brrn 66Mted by Wr 91"n xMicipalit W that 9 1=tures
Could be desi and cc w -6 ancot IL
brin this entire deliberative promm, and to tto Present, the am
his not isw a "Otim of Intent to see* outside info in the state
91$t&rs Minn. stet. 24*10 (1962) rupires as rollom:
14020 9C1C XTA7nW Cr 0075 =ff XMTZX
an s"MY seeks to o informeLion or opinioris in
Preparin to pr the adoption, areraje suppersione at
repeal of a rule f roe s outside of the a the ashallpubsishnoticeofitsactioninthestateroaid
afford all Intemi-stad persons am rt=it to Stn't
data or viv*v an tte subject of %6AAcern in writin or orall
JCh notice and an written material received b the ac shiLUbe=m a Pe rt of the he& r in record to be subm J t tad to the Sttor
TWY Qes ral bider section 14.16, (aphuis s
Althou ttw 1"m of cic with Kirin, St .9 14*20 m not raised durin
the he& rin It IS the statutor respam1bilit of the Bearin ft miner to de
t*=ine whedvr the A bas 'fulfil lad all relevw* substantive Wj p
dural re of I " or rule Kinn stet. msc aw) .
It* twial rule of Im Is that bad 1-cal defects in cc with
procedural re nts which do not reflect W faith underminin the purpose
PO A IN - .4oftt* VI.W%.WW and which do not prejudice the ri of Oxve Intand to be
PrO t0ctsd b tim will Dot ftef ice to over turn Ll tal action. Ci of
Kinr*apolis v, %Urtell., 291 X*1t*2d 386# 391 9(im. 1980) . this general rule
1hals bren aMlied to the rulanakin irogs of administrative a mere
the courts have rewired onl subs tantial oaapl iancee "ate o Trc. v. Chio
State RACIrg Oxmission, 122 N*2*36 463, =:Ptlon diond., 130 U.&M 455 WO
19501 Kinge q SN Pe M In (Xaska 1972) 1 k0er Leech & Worse
Inc. v. lbehin Uauor Control lbarde 575 P.26 721 ftbshirqt*n # IM)
40 M ft 40 40 40 40 so 40 40 ft ft 40 W ft
Pont.) . .
c. (airiftin %fttw Volt* 74dard A. brooft
Director of Sh knistant Director
Word tiwperties Building VID&S & Staldazda Divot
awes Wine CRMM chivin.me Ideorpme AIR
ad ath nn O Cm f Nommalt Creme Abr
Ack lbrrort General ft-z -11 An"11 fti tb
Pkilti Blowin hem%, Buildin aeficud
We 11brmw R* Catirb Wwbok
state n" ftrow Buildin fide & Standar&*v.0
Sivert Newdrickmon 1~ t Cm In
ftat 8upetvisot PUnr*"ta, ftire Chiefs W- 41-14ARM- &W
Oode
ion
O"uItants PiChf field sire D"rBuildinoo&s i ebm Div. •
Present Buildin CX*f LeW
do
v .
s
Ifiry am sow Mil 1 Ovucrt No yet to apply the "substantial aoerpliawe • doc-
trine to defects In aftiflUtrative tuleMrkinq rare. 1he hurt was asked
to that dactrLr* in Brothers Wolesale LiSvor •e Nwak 245 S.V.
30 238 Deere 1li10) , but refused to do se bricsuare tie agency in that case d
engaged in no ndenak ing proc disegs wha *fie Qdurt did not bald that
the doctrine would sat be applied in an appropriate case are i applicability
to mlemak ing ings under tree Xin lftinistrative !!roordures kt bas
bferrs ed. Oft hertz,. Pdministratiae 11u2enek1!q imwwta , 63
Kim* 180%T* M r Z5 (19*6
3n this matter, there is no evidence of aM bed fal th on the part of
t%0 APTCY in the solicitstim of outside =N ents and rule drafting procsdure.
der , the rd sh ma tha the SM made all rea xxwble attempts to all ov all
affecftd peahens "/or groups to participate in the deliberation pzoceas. lA1-
thoLgh the technical semiresaents in Mim. :tat. it 24.10 were not aaAplied with
by tee MM the of that statute has' been stet. There is no ePidrsoe
that anyone was praiudic ed by the failure of the to ly with the publ i -
CWtian tuvu irs art. Cx66q0ent1y# the Ma ringng Miner finds that the SM boa
xubetsntially ecamP110d• with the statutory 'solicitation• reWirwents. 2n
tt* narrow cir = tw*es of this caese, no negative findings or eonclusiais
will result.
S. lei to statutes do not mandate that mmieipalitles pyeorride
fire protection for their eitisens, EMY Xmici palities are endeavoring to
tr inta in a prof le"I of fire protection in the face of additional acn-
strvct ion and restricted budgets An to cu tb&* a in resouroes . by providirg
for built -in fire suppression systass in rmw c nstr%rctioo, a reasonable degree
of protection can be maintainedntained wi thout additional fire stations, obtaining mw
41W1 pmrnt and supplies, and recruiting additional fi personnel. Mw
e perience of Ybd- eater, Kirrbew which has lord a 'sprinkler ordinance' tar
the past 35 ?wrs shows that a1 thouo the poQulstion of the city has increased
by 32,0tW and the has an additional four re riles, the anlrorrs
remi resents for the fire deprertxwnt ha" been redtix.Jad by six fire-fighters.
12his is a direct result of - the mW irmo t that all now wnstrucUon be
owipped with autc=tie sprinkler systers. b~ aoddi tfon, avtc mtic sprinkler
wotemc have b shown to be bath life and property saving devices In case of
fire.
It* prapc ed =le 2 PCW i 1.10020, C tional provisions for =sstil.ls-
tion of On- promia" !'ire Suppression dystems, authorises municipalities !o
adcQt, Without clarqe, rwquirsawnts for the installation of autontie sprinkler
star in nry CaUtructian ar aft fob in the fulle fbe rule specifies t2w
types of r. ies alai with aquart foal rrQuirm"ts which rill tall anther
Pursuant to team. stet. g 16.56, sRabd, i (1"7) the so
ri!a .L&I
aQ+rI nt too the State building rode ( which permitted tomy of ,)bclm
ter to adapt s sprinkler ordinance. See Special prvvi sion the City of
ftctxstar contained in the SBC isuediateTy prior to ix "__J1ltot,gh Mcichesteristheonlysea, i cipal i ty which has been authorised t f in soda
Provisions different than the state lade, other unicipalitivi "vt also d x
so as part of soning regulations. She validity of thmm regulation is * ns-
tionable,, however. In light of the t9quirments of stein. state g 299r.ol1
A 982) , and the Minnesota fk prrac Mutt *# holding in _City of Kinnetonko •. Mark
2. axws A&WCe, 236 1t.1t030 163 11115)0
the `sprinkler' ft. Sets. single family vesidemrces are lot red by this
rote. Pt hearing the SM amei boo sentwx= in the prropoeed rule too elari-
fly ambiguities. 2* last sentence in paragraph Ce was anw to read, ftjhe
height and area lncreamn provided in sections 506 and 507 of the VAifom
vildirq ode, as in the state building cx Sp ore appl iaabl_e. • 2n a3di-
Lion, the 2wt sentence In paragraph x.11. was Mw to read, %11 ding offs-
cials, In cw=rmnme with their fir* chiefs, wry accept alte3rate systems
which !star fire protection capabilities equivalent t systems rhicib em ply with
m Standa 38-1 of the th i fors Build aa • 1he %a r ir+g ftmirwr finds that
t tfiese ear rats Merely clarity the intent of the rul and are not subs tantial
Choi ges to the rules as pr .
several building officials ted that the p Mle would
f rac tt fire oade requ i renrei is tat t the state, AM i tionally, tttore of -
f icials argvad that the sauare foot rewiredeents for owh of tt* cies
listed are both arbitrary and excessive, nts were suggestad to increase
the mu re foot IL . I nts for "ch omvpanty grouping, 1he V= conters
that this optiactal OP endix will not fragnent the 89C because if it is
r • sunic1po11ty, It aliast be in whole, tWs fr&gftntotion cmv t rir-
sulte advisory Board ssaber Patrick Z. Muol in, l%s,aistant Qiief of the lei -
field Public safety Depertsrertt stated that auantitotiae formulas which relate
the cubic feet of coup* rta,rnt site tO galloons of voter needed per a,inute and
s er requirezen were vned to establish the m4uare faotage rKuirsm nts.
use ocMutations are briefly described in bchibi t S to the Statement of IBed
and Peasonabl eltsss.
1a Minnesota State Builders Association and the Mlinnesotm Multi -gous-
ing Usaciation "M)k and *M respectively) both argued that the safety - fee-
turfs provideco by the propcovemid rule do not justify the cost for rule ispl4OM4W
ration. Zhe *M points out that !firm, stat. s 16.51, which requires that fthe
construction of buildings should b permitted at the least possible cost con-
sistent with rteog dad standards of health and safety dictates against t fs
prcposed rule. loth the ML's and the NSA bare MWested that paragraph C.U.
be areen W by deleting the square foot requiresent and arking the provision
applicable Only to "31 ings with units on Dour or nom floors rather than
three or more as proposed. 1bch argues that the t, 500 -*qua re -foot requ i remmt
cwtained in the rule is too restrictive W that a &+e11ing unit with three
floors cannot bit distinguished from a typical ate-family resideruoe.
Oar. !hi 1 de 1 sons ft= the Cb r 1 toes. t is Piro Pro ection
testified that it would cost less than $600 to sprinkle a 1,000 -eqsare 4ftfoot
4 ts#ent snit* sn addition, the , rocord shaves that insurance oast befits
will ammue to the orners of sWrinklsd • buildings. It afire does occur in •
sprinkled building,, s cbuetion in the loss of pcrperty arri/br pas sably We
Mill Mull. 20 derivation of the spare -moot requirments, has best di
abase. sisilar be sprinkler rsciuirwieent for apartsent bmnmLs rich bonne
11 i ng un i is on three or more floons -was also a Wt of face i t,l P
wanpoarer water deeasnd and r sire formulas.
Mr. 1til kin 1c rQer. testifying an behalf of the Mtirmsofa iety of
Architects, cstee that the taro •autaeaatic sprinkler systoeee• should be
varA "Mma lire rule tether than initial nee of the tem `tire suppression
saw
s7starr . 20 tans, Of ire A syst lies cased in the rule,
t o%wwr to sal ow tar the inclusion of othe tomes of rystaa+s in the rule by
Wy of later te
to asen3rd by the SM above the baring Diner finds that the nred
for and reasonableness of mile 2 Mt ; 1:10020 has been daroc:strabad
by an WICNativ! presentation of facts in the sword. S cause of ' a opti=W1
Datum of this VL ix to the SoC, "ch s,nicipality 41.11 hm the
opPortaanity to assess the CCG t-ef fQCtivw*= of this rule in light of Its own
needs a 2f unicipali ties deteaaine that this tule is too restrictive to be
ad''pted, ttw SM twy be feor to rrcons onersameoftheprVvi• is aantained
therein. Tere were anmndwents avggested to the p rule which are rags-
a able alternatives, hawwr. We baring iner points out that sany writ-
to" to 'were teoe f ved frcu fire chiefs, fire se rshals, s yors, and fin -
fighter organisations trirougtmt the state which "orie the rule as proposed
supp*rt Its reasonableness as s needed mature ftr fire protection and bud -
getary wan trol for smiciprl government.
Rased won the foregoing Pi.ndings of hct, the Rearing bm niner takes the
following:
CCNC IBS
10 That the 9u i ld ing Ovde Division gave proper notice of the hearing in
this aottaer. .
2. Zhat the 9= has fulfilled the pruc,iedvral requirements of Him. State
t 14 e14, WIL"S. 1 and 2 (1982) and all other proondural rss i rsaents of lawn or
rule.
3. mat the 11M has tend its statutory authority to 'adapt the pro-
posed rules, and has fulfilled all other substantive reQulz nts of law or
rule within the weaning of Minn. state tt 14.05 soda. 1, 11015, subd. 3 and
14050 (1) and (ii) a"2)0 '
I. 'fiat the SM has demonstrated the need! for and rea"blenm of the -
proposed rules by an affinaative presentation of facts in the record within
the 808"i ng of Minns. State is l 4.14, tuba. 2 and 14930 (iii) aM2) .
S. That the additions and aAe ntS to the proposed rules which were
suggested by the I after publ iceti of the p rules in the state Deg
toter do not result in rules which are substantially different from the pro-
posed rules as publ ish d in the state $eg ister within the weaning of !limos.
tat. t 14.15, subd. 3 a"2) aria 9 MM IS 2.11o ke Mid 2eUl (1980 NO).
i. that OW findings which night properly be to aDrclusians and soy
Cbrelusians which night pe rly be toom Findings are heraby as such.
7. Toot a tWing or ca lus ion of naed end movableness in r"ard to
aW particular sole . im does drat preclude and *040 not diaoourage the
tCa from further nadifieation of the rules h wed upon an oxmination of ttie
I is Gents that no wbstantial change is tide iron px
rul es as originally pal i shed, and ided that the rule f iP nall .. adopted is
based upon fact.(a"arinS In this rule hearing record. ...
Based upon the i ng Oocl usions, the lber ing limner the fol
It
JON
it is hereby r the t the prfowcmW rul es be adopt9A dons istsnt with
the FinAi np acid Oxclusions srde abavl.
Dated this daY of f!t ruiry, IM, -
Waring bcmine t
ported: 0
s
r
s
40
r
r
s
r
s
40
SPRINKLER URE I REMEHTS 'g._ 12/15/82Wr
occupancy Group 1979 UBC Rgmts City of Rochester Appendix E option
MOT
per Ch.38 amendments proposed 1983
IOOa+ w sta a A-i All areas
1000 w stn a A -2 c- ° u o Al w/300+ occupanIMWLor•— a / tS
4 300+ A - 2.1 a`'-s °o `" + .a area s
300 fO
r Stadl,= etc. -N
L W
OD so
A 4j
service scat.
garMes
T
N r-
retai 1 +1200 w o WwretaiIstorofs -Z
d school +12t -°3 hi h i l e stor c
C>
C>
Pq o
O o
o
hangar stor
non com stor - 4
CV
c coo
X r r— N
C
C r0 W
thru 12th 50+ E -1
4-mthru12th -50 - E -2
L)T
4-
L
4-0 +
day care, etc E -3
o
O
Q
N
E
r-o
L
L
haz materials H -i
o
r.
c +1500
f 1 am liquids H -2 N +1 500
o dust generat H -3 L +3000
repai garages99 H-ov stor + 0 one byo
20200 Zone 3
s repair hangars H -5 a •
0014-1
0
o
C 4-
Hos nurs hm I -1
B su rvd. i ve L - 2
NNW
mental 'ails I -3J a L
C
a,
4J
V,
4J
a[C
C
sery stat 3000+
a ra e s 5000+
off & school 8500+ or 3._ st.+
reta ih & stor 2000+ or 3 st.+
850x+ or 2 st.+
8500+ or 2 st.+
All w/ +29 occupants
r
partments R -1 - o +20200 or 4st Zn 1 8500+ dA,3 st.+
c hotels - +30000 Zone 3 8500+ 1 ' 3 st.+
we 1in9s R•3 ., Ii
J-
V '
I? ri - v ara es M -1
tan s. etc. -
f Attachment nine
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION NINE OF THE
MAPLEWOOD CODE RELATING TO SPRINKLERS
r
THE COUNCI L OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 9 -22 of the Maplewood Code is hereby amended to read as
follows (additions underlined, deletions crossed out) :
Sec. 9 -22. Procedures and administration.
As provided by the state building code, the following appendices of the
state building code are hereby adopted by reference:
Appendix A - -Fall Out Shelters
Appendix B - -vari ati ons in Snow Loads
1979 1982 Uniform Building Code Appendix Chapter 35
M nnesota Plumbing Code Appendix B
State Building Code Appendix C-- Abbrevia and Addresses of Technical
Origin
4979 1982 Uniform Building Code Chapters 12, 48 49, 55, 70.
Minnesota Plumbing Code -- Appendix C, D
State B u i l d i n g Code Flood Proofing Regulations--Section 201.2 through 208.2
Appendix E-- Sprinklers
Section .2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after
passage and publication.
Passed by the city counci of the
City of Maplewood, Minnesota,
this day of 1983
Mayor
Attest:
Ayes- -
C1erk Nays --
s
T
L
i
r{