Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983 05-09 City Council PacketA)CALL TO ORDER tB) ROLL CALL C)APPROVAL OF MINUTES a- D)APPROVAL OF AGENDA E),CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routin9 e by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion on these items. If discussion is desired that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered9eed separately. 1. Accounts Payable 20 Advanced Life Support Care & Transportation 3. Holloway Ave. - Contract Amendment F)PUBLIC HEARINGS 10 Rezoning: English St. (Skillman - Tracks) 7:00 2. Variance: English St. (Nuebel) 7:00 3 Rezoning: Skillman & Clarence, 7:00 f br,!. 4. Rezoning: Century Ave (Ivy to Tracks) 7:30 i i 5, Code Amendment: S i ns in R -1 Zone 7:45g 60 Rezoning: McKnight & Maryland, 8 :00 e f „ 70 PUD Revision: Maryland & Ferndale 8:15 G)AWARD OF BIDS s R; 19 T.H. 61 Frontage Road H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Request .from Mr. Otto NEW BUSINESS 10 Budget Transfer for Microcomputer Purchase 2. 1982 Annual Report & Audit 3. Ordinance to Abolish Insurance Committee 40 McKnight Rd. Trunk* Water Main & Tank 50 Feasibility Study - Beaver Lake North 6. Amending Pole Bldg Ordinance - 1st Reading 70 Maplewood Shirts, Caps, etc. 8. Update of National Fire Code J) VISITOR PRESENTATIQN K) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS i ACCOUNTS.PAYABLE 5-09-83 Page l u 1953 CITY OF MA PLE YO OD CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM_ DES RIPTI ON 012052 04/25193 5, 243.05 "INN STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC - PBL Sp 24 3.0 3 - — -- ---- 6' 102502 MINN STATE TREASURER DitIY£RS LIC PBL04/25!83 26.0 r 226.00 12 102710 04125183 22 500.00 POSTMASTER POS 13 2,500.00 # 15 i6 17 ;102A74 04/25/83 1 ! 660,77 DAMSON PATERSON PRINTING 418'1 9 660.77 ! 201 s; lflt 21 22 VOYA FOLETI CH REFUND ON INTERES 102C37 04/25/83 10.63 23 10.6 3 25:ff!!f! 20': k I 27 ;102065 ;,Oil25 /83 34!_ 00 SCHIEPS RESTR _ADUL TRIP t 1 428 341.00 W ( 126 30 102p 04/25/83 100 *00 SWEDI SM INSTITU ADULT TRIP 31 f 100000 32 10 I 34 35 103218 04/25/83 500AM=E V DOLAN SERVICES RENDEREt 36 1 _03218 04/25!! 3 500 E DOLAN SERVICES RENDEREt 3 103218 —.0425/83 SOO.flO V E - V DOLAN SERVICES RENDEREt 38 500 .O tI + 39 i 42 103502 04125/8 202505 MIWN STATE TREAS MOTOR VE _LI - C PB 431 03502 - --04/25 53 115.00 FINN _STATE TREAS DRIVERS LIC PBL 441 3040.15 40, 47 '481 10382 04/25/83 500.00 5000 TH CM S OELA NEY SERVICES RENDERE f 152153i 103829 04/25/83 500.00 JOHN KENNA SERVICES RENDERE 13 4' '500.00 ! 57ss c Page 2 83 CITY OF MA PL.E WO OD CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR CHECK OEGISTER IT DES : m' 1 4SO 0 1,96 W ST A TETRETREASURER _MOTOR WEN tI C E41045020412518391.00 MN STATE TREASURER P DRIVERS LIC PBL512t a 104742 94125183 S .Ofl CLERK OF 1118 C DRIVERS. L IC1oi58.40 ! 0 _ tt f 12: !! ! ! ! 13 105502 04/25/83 356.00 MN STATE TREASURER MOTOR VET# LIC PE1'54 105 502 04 / 25f 83 48.00 MN_ STATE TREASURER LIC16 17! 404.00 PSL i I e: 1q 20 105937 21; 154125/83 205,00 205.00 t UNITED WAY ST PAUL P/R 31)CT w 2ti i 25. 105D67 04/25/83 19.54 —REP M VEVHiTESEARAMC 281 19.54 28 30;10x472 04/25/83 4 , P675900 METRO WASTE CONTR SAC PABLE1323' 108472 04125183 46.75—METRO WASTE CONTROL SAC PABLE 431 4 628.25 ! 31 351 36;1085Q2 0 4/ 25/83 19 22 5.75 FINN STATE MOTOR_ VEH LTC 1371 113850Z 04125183 5.140 TREASURER_ INN STATE. TREASURER DNR L I P8L t 08502 04125/83 13 MINN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC PSL 3y 1 * 407.75 41sa 42 i 43 165532 04/25/83 AVEL TRAINING1S.OD P•E,H.Ao 15.00 7 sa 104232 04/25183 190 EMP BE DENTAL CLAI PE 32, s'109502 04/25/83 59360.25 MN STATE TREASURERE MOTORMO0 YEN LIC PE5411219000MNSTATETREASURERDRIVERSLICPOL Page 3 1993 CITY OF MAPLEYOOD CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITE DESCRIPTION ss 10975E 04125/$3 2 RMSY CUT C©NCIL AMB RUNS 4 24.00 s 7 109CT6 94125:!83 17050 OFFICE PRODUCTS r TRAVEL TRAINING 9 109C 04/25183 1 . 7.50 OFFi_CE__ - PRODUCTS TRa . v7L TRAINING 10 35.00 * 4`110282 04/25/83 25,00 GOVT TRAINING SERV TRAVEL TRAINING1 :511 25. 1 110502 04125/$3 219000 MN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC PBL 20 21E 219.00 23 i 2 110742 04/570 CLERK O DIST CT CNTY DRIVERS LIC 25:57*00 26 v 271 f g 2 2 110068 04/25/83 64800 CADILLAC PLASTIC SUPPLIESY 30;648. 31: 33 34 111502 04/25/83 39 826.85 MN STATE TREAS MOTOR VEH LIC POL 3 111502 04125/83 3i* 062.75 MN STATE TREAS MOTOR VEH LIC PSL 36:111502 04/25/83 168.00 MN STATE TRE DR LI PB 37 30 341 3 f f 41 111504 04125/83 570.71 MN STATE TREAS SURTAX 'PBL. 4 111504 04/251 11.41 •M ST TREAS S .PFL 44 t 46 ; s :47 111589 04/25163 18 T53.116 T A SCHIFSKY CONTRACT POL 4e 18,05 f 52 112502 04/25/$3 69649.36 MN STATE TREASURER MO - T0;t V H + LIC POL t 3 112502 04/25/83 261.00 MN ST ATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC POLi 'ls4'6010.36 ss Page 4 1983 CITY OF "A PLE YO OD CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER f VENDOR ITEM DES :RI T O' 2 3 11 04/2518 4t 426.73 PIN STATE TREA P /R DEDUCT 4 j 112557 04/25/83 39821.02 FN STATE TREAS P/R DEDUCT 51 112557 04/25/83 18.22 MN STATE TREAS P/R D.DUCT 6!112_5 . 57 0412 43.52 MN STATE TRE _ N PlR DEDUCT 112557 134f25/83 all STATE TREAS P/R DEDUCT____ a 112557 04/25183 100076 MN STATE TREAS P/R DEDUCT 11255 0 163 173 39 NN_ STATE TREAS_P/R DEDUCT__ o 112557 04/25/83 189 04 MN STATE TREAS P/R DEDUCT 112557 04/25/83 38019 MN STATE TREAS P/R DEDUCT f2'112557 fl4/2_5 53.51 ATE_TREAS P!R DEDUCT _ 13 112557 A4%25/83 364:51 MN_ST MN STATE TREAS P/R DEDUCT c 141 112557 04/25/'83 146.84 MN STATE TREAS P/R DEDUCT 15 112557 04125183 _49.1fl2.20 MN STATE TREASv PlR_ DEDUCT a 112557 019 /25/83 374.46 MN STATE TREAS P/R DEDUCT r 17 112557 04/25/83 261.60 KN STATE TREAS P/R DEDUCT e 112557 04/25/8 MN ST ATE TREAS P /R_ _DE 199 112557 04/25183 209 181 .09 MN STATE TREAS P/R DEDUCT 20 112557 04/25/83 129.194 MN STATE TREAS P/R DEDUCT 1 112 84I25/13 597.74 MN _STATE TREAS P /R_ DED _ 112557 04%25%83 329.74 MN STATE TREAS P/R DEDUCT 23 112557 04/25/83 35.28 MN STATE TREAS P/R DEDUCT 241 04/25/83 197.40 -MN -. ST ATE TREAS P /R _DE3 ! _._.- 2 ` - s 112557 112551 i%23/83 30206 MN STATE TREAS P/R DEDUCT 112557 04/25/83 80.16 MN STATE TREAS P/R DEDUCT 112557 126o62 N- STATE _TREAS P /.R DEDUCT a 2ts 112557 04%25%$3 92.96 MN STATE TREAS P/R DEDUCT E 2 112557 04/25/83 64.76 MN STATE TREAS P/R DEDUCT r 1 112557 MN STATE _P/R DED1lC_T - 31 112557 i 04/25 04/25/83 49058 _ 65.96 TREAS MN STATE TREAS P/R DEDUCT 112557 04/25153 16.66 NN STATE TREAS PlR DEDUCT 31 112557 04125 403.7 MN STATE -TREAS _ --P/R ..DEOWC.T_.- ..__.__. t34 +112557 04%25/83 119080 MN STATE TREAS P/R DEDUCT c3-179139.58 i6 137 ftt4lR i i f 115015 04/28/83 324.AFSCME UNION DUES P 8L 115015 04128/83 5.32 AFSCME UNION DUES P 8L40'329.52 1 115153 04/28/13 299.50 CT CATY- ERPL_CRED CREDI_TUNIfl'_ P8+ e. 47 13, 299.50 4 t 49 ol 115330 04128/83 641.99 ICPA RETTREMNT DEFERR COMP 115330 04/28/83 102 . 96 I RETIR DEFERRED C 52!153 744.95 i t 115373 04/28/83 145.00 ROSEMARY KANE P/R DEDUCTION s Page 5 1983 CITY OF MAPLE YO OD CHECK REGISTER t f CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VEND IT DESC TI 0' 2 145.00 F 3 S a 115453 04/28/83 141630.MAP ST BANK FWT P =$L 7 4, 630.81 ! t i 115470 04/28/83 24.00 METRO SUPERVI UNIOw DUES PBL81224 .00 • 141 tai 115 502 04128/83 4, 469.45 MN STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEW LiC P! 171 115502 04125183 121.00 MN ST ATE TREASURER DNR LIC PBL tai 11 04/28/33 2 PN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC PBL 19 115502 04/28/83 164,.tI!MN - STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC - PBL r 20 4 *985..45 ! 21 23, 24 115 520 04/28/83 264.MN B ASSN INSURANCE PBL 23 26 ze 2$115540 04/28/83 310 *00 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS INS PAYABLE301310. 00 32 33 341 115556 04128/83 300.00 MN STATE RETIREMNT DEF:R;t=D COMP _ 35! 36+ 300.00 371 ilk 38 3y 115559 04/28/83 79554 * 13 STATE TREAS_ S /S /S PAYABLE 40 115559 04/28/83 7, 554.13 MN MN STATE TREAS S/S S/S PAYABLE 424 441 4s 115870 04128/83 39 134.34 MN. ST ATE iO REV SWT P 46 47 9134*34 48 so 115973 94128183 158.88 DISC DEPT REVENUE SYT PBL S,1 a. 88 S2 i4i S 116502 04/28/93 3 68g.60 MN STSITE TREASURER T_ ! MOTOR - VER LIC Pf 56 7 3t 688.80 Page 6 1983 CITY OF MAPLE WOOD CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER t t VENDOR ITEM DESCRIP 04/28163 40.00 40.00 04128/83 4, 548.75 04/28/83 119000 Azv VC 3 4 , S 116D83 61 7 117588 6 375.00 tc 117502 t ,11 112, 11 7502 04/28163 40.00 40.00 04128/83 4, 548.75 04/28/83 119000 Azv VC SEXUAL OFFENSE TRAVEL TRAINING MN ST ATE TREASURER MOTOR VER LIC PBL MN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC PBL 15 16;117588 04/28/83 375.00 M.F.O.A CERT OF CONF ORMA t 1!375.00 io 21 116502 0 J2a/83 S 17 6.0 INN STATE _TREASURER MOTOR VEH _LIC _P81 2i'1 04128/83 127000 MINN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC POLE 23f 5s 274.60 241 2 x 26 2.7 118742 0 CLERK OF D I ST CT —.---CH.TY DRI VCRS -. _L IC59.50 59.50 • 4 zsi f32 118670 04/28/83 330.88—COMN OF REVENUE DIESEL Tax PBL 1 X 2 059.23_COMM OF REVENUE_ _DIESEL TAX P 8L 34'1 v T28.3 5 E 3S 1 36 37 3e 119502 05/02183 5, 936054 MIN STATE TREAS MOTO% VE LI C PBi 136pf3195021 05/02/83 302.:00 141 STATE TREA ORIVER LIC BL 0 i 69238.54 X41 t 2 lk 43+ 119084 05/02/83 18540 IIMC CONF REGISTR TRAVEL TRAINING 4 185.00 r b' l 48 410 X29002 04f2a /S 46.00 A -1 BUSINESS MACHINE laAINT C0IT - RACT sa 129002 04128/83 48000 A•1 BUSINESS MACHINE TAINT CONTRACT 129002 04/28/83 9649 A' 1 .BUSINESS _MACHINE MAINT CONTRACT S2!129002 04/28813 144.00 A•1 BUSINESS MACHINE MAINT CONTRACT t S3!129002 04/28/33 4840 A -1 B US TNESS MA CHINE MA INT CONTRACT 129002 04/28/63 192000 A -1 BUSINESS MACHINE MAINT CONTRACT 129002 04128/63 48404 A -1 BUSINESS MACHINE M CONTRACT 571 129002 04128/83 640 A -1 BUSINESS MACHINE MA INT CONTRACT SEXUAL OFFENSE TRAVEL TRAINING MN ST ATE TREASURER MOTOR VER LIC PBL MN STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LIC PBL Page 7 1983 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHE NO.DATE AMO VENDOR ITEM DES: R I P TI ON F 2 129002 04123/83 96 *90 A -1 BUSINESS MACHINE MA INT CONTRACT 3 12900 04 /_2a_ /S 48 *00 Awl BUSINESS_ MACHINE_MAINT C04TRACT 4 129002 04/28/83 9600 A -1 BUSINESS MACHINE -MAINT CONTRACT s 960.00 f 12904 9 04/1.1B3 7 ,35 _ACR4- MI_NN= SOT ImC OFFICO SUPPLIES 10 ,935 R _ s i1+ t 131 141 129011 04l2T/63 49 ADVANCE LIGHTING INC SUPPLIES 12901_1 04!27 49. 92 ADVANCE LIGHTING INt12901104/27/83 49 92-ADVANCE LIGHTING INC SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 17,49.92 l 191 29012 04/21163 AD i N STAMP CORP TOF ICE SUPPL IES zo t2d 129012 04/21/83 10.30.ADVANCE STAMP CORP OFFICE SUPPLIES 129012 04/27/93 10_.38 ADVAN S C OFFICE SUPPLIES 221 10.3 f ! 23. 24 261 129091 04/27/83 182.14 BILL BOYER FORD REPAIR !TAINT VET271 30 31 129103 fl4lZ8/83 21.92 B'4ARD OF WATER CORM UTILITIES x.'321 129103 04128153 4.48-BOARD OF MATER COMM UTILITIES1:33! 129`103 04/2818 6 :48 BOARD OF WATER COMM UTILITIES iA 129103 28183 26 f B0ARD 0ATt COMM UTILI TIES 35 129103 04/28/83 6.48 BOARD OF WATER COMM UTILITIES 36 129103 04128/8 12.12 BOARD OF MATER COMM UTILITIES 37 2228.64 O RD OF — w4T R CONp _CONITRAC T - -PYri - - - -- 39 303.87. + Alir . 129110 _0 DD BRISSMAN KENNEDY SUPPLIES48 441 451 47 129120 04127/83 30012 BUREAU OF BUSINESS P MEMBERSHI' 30.12 52 1291 TT 04/27/83 4.45 COPY EQUIPMENT O SUPPLIES s4' 3'4.45 sb j_129236 0 20000 EVANS BARRY VEHICLE ALLOY Page 8 L,L C I T 1 198 3 CI TY OF "A PLE WO 00 CHECK R EGj ST E R CHECK N4. DATE r c AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIP TI 20 0 .0 0 6 ' 1 129 041 _22080 129261 04127183 — 27.30 - t ° '50.10 GEN_ELECTRIC SUPPLY _SUPPLIES _ 41ER ELECTRIC SUPPLY SUPPLIES 12 129 04/27/83 228.41 _GENERAL REPAIR SERVI SUPPLIES V H 1 129264 04r271E3 7.05 GENERAL SAFTY EQUIP REPAIR Pa_V: t 129264 04/27/83 76.22 GENERAL SAFTY EQUIP REPAIR NAINT V 17 ; ra f 83.27 • 120f 12 04f271 18.18 _GENUINE _PARTS CO SUPPLIES_NEN f23' 24' 12 04 /27/83 133.00 GEORGES BODY SU VEH25133,00 SHO 261 27 129276 04/27!83 4.00 GOODYEAR SERVICE STO REPAIR MAINT 30, 12_927_6 31 124276 04f27 fl4128/! 3 5.00 179,36 GO COY EAR GOODYEAR SERVICE STO S:RV I V .STO REPAIR M REPAI R MAINT VE 321 129276 04/28183 154. Zm GOODYEAR SERVICE STD REPAIR MAINT V1 13 129276 04128 164.GOODYEAR TO REPAIR MAINT VE 34; 129276 84/28/83 148.36 GOODYEAR SERVICE SERVICE STO REPAIR MAINT VE 136 35 346972 371 sad 39. 129287 04/27/ 83 23 GREY. JAIET _ -SUPPIES 411 129287 04/27%83 16.15 GREY JANET FUEL L f ,4,39.9 0 i 129258 04/27/83 13.fl0 GRUSERS HAgDVARE MAN SUPPLIES VE4 13.00 1,7 4d 1293 04/27/83 5500 HENNEPIN COU CHIE TRA TRAINING 501 s1 * *fit 53, s2. 129348 04/27/83 65088 INTL BUS MACHINES CO OFFICE SUPPLIES 54 65.58 t Page 9 1983 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGI STE R CHECK N0.DATE AMOUNT VEND ITEM DESCR IP TI C 3 129382 04127183 7 .12_KN OVL ANS SUPE MARKE SUPPLIES 7.12 t s 7 t 129384 8412?/83 93.91 KNOX LUMBERE SUPPLIES 9 93.91 *F 12 129401 04/27!83 35.00 LANG RICHARD CANINE RETAI NER 4 35.00 129452 04/27/83 r _ 163.35 MAPLE WO REVIEW PUBLISHING i ' 201 23 t 129464 04/27/83 17 MERIT CHEVROLET CO SUPPLIES VEr1 24; 25 1772 f X26' 3 i`7 Ze.129477 04/27/83 35.00 METTLER DANIEL CANINE RETAINER i 30 35.00 321 111 33;129 4 04/27 456.00 MINN MINI • MF CO SIGNS S T GHAL S 14 129495 04/27/83 36.45-M INN MINING + MFG CO SIGNS SIGNAL S 43'.5, 36• 419.55 ! 37 lie' 139 129502 0 150 MINN STATE TRrASURER MEMBERSHIP 40 1 1 S #0 0 41i 42 129530 04/27/83 258009 MN DEPT PUBLIC SAFTY OFFICE SUPPLI4511l258o0 L X47 48 49,129563 04/27/83 1 i 654,39 MN UHEMPLOY COMP UN _.___UNEMQlCaY BENEF I o 1 *1654.39 L i 53' 54 129565 y 04 /27/83 40.00 MITCHELL WINFIELD A APPR4 S: RVI s 129565 04/2 ? /83 afl.DO__MITCMfEII . YZNFIELO A —.— - --APPRAISAL SE RVI56F04/27/83 a0.00 MITCit €lL YINFIELD A APPRAISAL SE RV Ist Page 10 1983 CITY OF MAPLE WOOD 2 3 4 s 6 CHECK N0. DATE 129565 04/27/83 129565 04/27/83 129582 04127183 265,87 MPLS STAR • TRIBUNE PUBLISHING 26S.87 CHECK REGISTER AM3 UN T VE N00I ITEM DE S : R I P TI ON 180,00 MITCHELL WINFIELD A APPRAISAL SE RVIC 62040 MITCHELL WIN A APPRAISAL SERVIC O" i 2; 13 129588 4M /33 2e50 NANCE OFF IC t30K 14!2o50 1 i t 7 : ems 1 04/27 /83 1 SM MUNICI CLERKS + F MEMBERSH _ 19j 1 S.flO 20; 22 1231 129658 04/28/83 579957 NORTHERN STATES POWE UTILITIES 24;12965 04/28/83_2o40 NORTHERN STATES POWE 4 129658 04/28183 3953 NORTHERN STATES PONE UTILITIES. UTILITIES Y .2ff 129658 04/28/83 2.40 NORTHERN STATES POWE UTILITIES 27,129658 X04/28/83 3.5 K _STATES. POWE yT_ILI.TI,E -S .-,-,-- t E4 129658 0428/83 541.75 NORTHERN STATES POWE UTILITIES121012965804/28/83 1,NORTHERN STATES POWE UTILITIES j 129658 0442_818 80. 90 NORTHERN STATES PO UTILITI130;3t 129658 044 81E3 71•.55 NORTHERN STATES POWE UTILITIES 129658'04/28/83 37.96 NORTHERN STATES POPE UTILITIES 129658_04/28l83 89.39 NORTHERN STATES POPE UTILITIES _ 131 ;129658 04/28/83 79.86 NORTHERN STATES POPE UTILITIES 129658 04f28fR3 51850.82 NORTH+ERN STATES PONE UTILITIES 136 129658 _04/28/83 54.03 1 NORTHERN STATES POPE PoirE UT IL TIES 2 '"129658 0 l28h83_1.80 l_00TKERN' STATES UTILITIES 138 129658 04/28/83 94.17 NORTHERN STATES POWE UTILITIES I 'w 129658 04128/ 83 110.41 WORT14ERNSTATES POWE UTILITIES.140j 129658 04128f83 68.41 NORTHERN STATES POKE UTILITIES 129658 04/28/83 4.25 NORTHERN STATES POPE UTILITIES 42 129658 04/28/83 4.25 NORTHERN STATES POWE UTILI TIE - S 43T 129658 X04128/83 4.25 H4RTNERN_ STATES'_06 OTILITTFS 129658 04128/83 101.7.6 NORTHERN STATES POWE UTILITIES w 04/28/5 70_•24 ._. -.NORTHERN STATES POPE UTILITIES_129658 129658 04128/83 30.00 NORTHERN STATES POKE UTILITIES 71 129658 04/28/83 302.35 ,NORTHERN STATES POPE UTILITIES 481 12965 04/28/514.2 STATES POPE UTILITIES 4C 9 - 129658 04%28/83 64.1 T NORTHERN NORTHERN STATES POWE UTILITIES 6.129658 04/28/83 121.37 NORTHkER N STATES POWE UTILI 129658 04128 13.66 NORTHERN ,STATES POPE UTILITIE 32 129658 04-/28/83 9.29 NORTHERN STATES PAYE UTILITI''ES 453 129658 04/28/83 172.89 NORTHERN STATES POWE UTILITIES 5"129658 04/28/83 50076 NORTHERN STATES POWE UTILITIES 129658 04/2383+_198,90 _NORTHERN STATES POD UTILITIES d 10 02 2.98 f CHECK REGISTER AM3 UN T VE N00I ITEM DE S : R I P TI ON 180,00 MITCHELL WINFIELD A APPRAISAL SE RVIC 62040 MITCHELL WIN A APPRAISAL SERVIC Page 11 1983 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK RESISTER CHECK N00 DA TE AMOUN V ITEM _0ES :RIP Ti ON 2 31 1***f.* 57 5 129660 04/28/83 54.13 NORTHWESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE 6 }129650 04/28 42 _NORTHWESTERN B TE t TELEPHONE 7 124660 04/28183 8.59 NNORTH WEST- €ZH BELL TE TELEP HOME s 129660 04128/8.3 50 092 NORTHWESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE 129660 0 9.8 NORTHWESTERNRN BELL TE . -- - --TELE HONE 4' 4c 129650 04/28/83 20. 10 NaRTH4 ESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE 111 , '129660 04/28/83 45.29 NORTHWESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE POSTAGE 12 129660 04/2_8 165966 BELL _TE TELE 13y 129660 0 %Zaf83 18095 NORTS WESTERN SELL TE TELEP 14!129660 04128/83 24081 NORTHWESTERN BELL.TE TELEPHONE 15129660 04/26 *2 _NORTHWESTERN BELL TE _TELEP,HON.E._.__ _ 129660 04/28/83 94.95 NORTHWESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE STREET 17 129660 04/28/83 27.45 NORT4YESTEtN BELL TE TELEPHONE x.00 129660 0_4128 121.05_NORTH WEST ERN BEL TE TELEPHONE t t9;129660 04l - 28/83 25.9.5 ORTt!BELL TE TELEPHQNE 120; KAINT 129660 04128/83 1430.90 NORTHWESTERN HELL TE TELEPHONE STREET . __ 129650 04/28/8 9.5•.NORTHWESTERN SELL TE _Ti: EP HONE _-- - 04/27/83 22 "-129 - 660 Q4/28183 42.97 NORTHWESTERN BELL TE TELE r 23!129660 04/27/83 40.83 NORTHWESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE REPAIR 24 129660 04/28183 25,95 NORTHWESTERN BELL TE TE_ _ TELEPHONE _ TEtEP STREET 25 12966[3 - --0 iI27183 18 NORTH -EST ER BLL. E 5 H4NE f 129.660 04/27!83 101.47 NORTHWESTERN BELL.TE TELEPHONE 27=129660 04/28183 104.10 NflRTN WESTER N BELL.TE TE LEP BONE REPAI R 2 1291660 04/28/83 5303 NORTH WESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE ty 129660 04/28f83 25.95 N0RT14 WESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE 30 12966Q 04/28/8 28087 NORTHWESTERN BELL0`;0_0__0.TE _TELEPHONE iii-129660 04f28%83 1:78 NORTtt ESTER N BELL TE TELEPHONE 32 129660 04/28/83 26.52 NORT BELL TE TELEPHONE 53 1 04/2 29.45 _N BELL TE TELEPHONE X34 3S 1, 719.21 57 Ur 129702 04/27!83 74000 PITNEr-BOWES INC CONTRAST PYM 39 40 ' 4'ff *f* 142 i43'Q 2 %a 9t 0.ilD POST MASTEI POSTAGE129Ti0 144!900.00 f 45 S 48 9 81276 04/27/83 4.50 RICE STREET CAR !WASH M REPAIR MAINT VET 9 129 "768i8 x.00 RI CE STREET CAR MASH tEP MAINT YES t Sol 129768 04/27/83 18000 RICE STRE CAR WASM REPAIR KAINT YEF 129 768 04/27 13. 50_RICE STREET . __CAR . -WASH REPAI R 0. 0_____00SH MAINT VE-f 52 12 04/27/83 27000 RICE STREET CAR WA-REPAI R MA I NT M r r3f 129768 04/27183 4.50 RICE STREET CAR WASH REPAIR MAINT VET S4 129768 04127/.83 4 .50 RICE STREET CAR WASH REPAIR MAINT VU 5 129T68 04%27%83 900Q-- ----_.RICE STREET CAR WISHREPAIRREPAIR MAINT VEr 36 129768 04/27/83 4sS9 RICE STREET CAR MA REPAI R MAINT VET 57 Page 12 1983 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK ISO•DATE AMOUNT VE ITEM DESC 2 129768 04/27/83 9.0.0 RICE STREET CAR MASH REPAIR MAINT VEH 3 129768 04 /27 /83 13.50 RI —CE _STREET CAR WASH _ _REPAIR MAINT VEH 41 129768 04/27f83 4.5 0 RICE STRErw T CAR MASH REPAIR M k INT VEH s'129768 04/27/83 4.50 RICE STREET CAR WASH REPAIR MAINT VEH s 126.00 r 129770 04/27/63 3.00 RICHA ROS MARKET SUPPLIES PROG 12 3.00 129778 04 13_ 000 RO-DEPOSIT REFUND 1 17; 129798 04/27/83 32.80 S t T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 2 l 129798 014/19,41 S + T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 22 129798 04/27/83 3.20—S + T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 129798 134/27/83 98.12 S + T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 24 129798 04127/8 324 S + T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 25,129798 04/27183 20.17 S + — T " OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE S UP P L IES f 261 129798 04/27183 3.40 S + T OFFICE PR COUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 27+12979 9 4 /2718 35.75 S T OFFICE_ .PRODUCT_OFFICE S a 2F,129798 04/27/83 35.75 S + T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES t z 129798 04/27/83 35.75-S + T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES e 3O '245.45 + 34 .129841 04/27/83 272 ST PAUL CITY OF REPAIR MAINT EAL t 35i 129841 04/27/83 609.05 ST PAUL CITY OF REPAIR MAINT EQL 36 129841 0 290.00 ST PAUL CIT OF REPAIR MAINT EQL 37; 38 3f-129842 04/ r 1.60._93 ST PAUL DISPATCHATCH PUBLISHING 41, 160.9 3 * 42 143; s 4e 129852 04/27/83 10030 ST PAUL STAMP WORKS SUPPLIES s 10.30 4a 4p 129874 04/27/83 121.35 STO SPRING L ALIGN REPAIR MlkINTVE} 50` stj 121 •S S + 52;129875 04/27/83 68.25 STREICHER GUNS INC SUPPLIES`RA4GE 153S ' 68.25 04127/83_6 * 50 ...__TABUE- ATIH6_ SERY ..__ SURE ___,DATA PRO.0 =_SS ING Page 13 1933 CITY OF MA PLE WO OD CHE N0. DATE CHECK REGISTER AM3UNT VEND ITEM DESCRIPTIOR 2 76,50 4 129889 04/27/83 211040 T A S CHIFSKY REPAIR TAINT i S 211.48 i 1129902 04/97018 TOLZ KING DUVALL "CONTRACT PYN F 11 12 129903 04/27 /83 TOLL MELDING SUPPLY SUPPLIES 13: 129903 04/27/33 43.111 17.25 SUPPLYYOLie .01 H _i. - SUPPL ItS -- 1s 15 60.26 ! 17 a. 129906 04/7.544 * 30 TRACY OIL FUEL 19 1299136 04/27/83 9152.0lD TRACY OIL OIL FUEL OI zo: 129906 04127183 3t 892.00.TRACY OIL FUEL OIL 21 129906 84/27/19 472.00 TR ACY OIL FUEL OIL 22{ 129906 04f27/83 7,, ?'84.00 TRACY OIL FUEL OIL 23 129906 04127/83 5915240 TRACY OTL FUEL O1L 24 30 096.00 a 28 ' 129914 04127/83 40.00 TWIN CITY FILTER SER FILTERS CLEA NED 12Q!40.0 15 30 ; 32 ` 33i 129954 04/27/83 21.5 VIRTUE PRINT CO OFFICE SUPPLIES 35t . 36 *!!>!!! 3 38 124957 04/27/83 7. 8 WARMERS TRUEVALUE HO OFFICE SUPPLIES 3y 129937 04/27183 608 IiARNERS_ TRUE_VALUE HD SUPPLIES 40M 129957 64/27183 12 „94 WARNERS TRUE VALUE ! HD JAN SUPPLIES JAN141t ' 29957 04/27/83 14.86 UARNE RS TRUE VALUE HD SUPPLIES 42 42 .63 45 129960 04127183 23.73 WEBER + TROSETH iNC _REPAIR MAINT VEH 1471 129960 413 129960 04/27/83 04/27/83 01• 29.50 WEBER + TROSETH INC WEB + TROSETH INC REPAIR MAINT VEH DRY . CHEMICALS so 53.2 2 52 53; 129A42 94126/83 MOB MEEHA N PAMELA SUPPLIES EOU IP 54 150.00 I56 157 Page 14 1983 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER f CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 129611 0 412616 3 3 129C18 04126/83 96.95 96.95 JIM HATCH SALES SUPPLIES EQUIP t4 9 MORSE - CLINTON PROFESSIONAL S ER z CISiATN NEWSPAPERS -_.___3i 129021 04/26/83 12.004112.00St l 1 a 1290470 04/9.00 _G J REFUND 19 20 000 6 23 129069 04/26/83 332,58 B F 6 OODRI CH TIRE SUPPLIES YEN 24 332.5 26 129070 04/26183 15.00 H B H CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT REFUND 27 1Z9T1 :0 54.D0 LEE CHARLES REFUND1129:301 31 54.00 32 129D72 04!26183 15000 C S PC CROSSAN DEPOSIT REFUND 3 15 *00 t 35 E 129D73 04/26/83 89.50 SMIS STRE_T METALS SUPPLIES 36 37 89.50 3a1 129014 94/26.1 302.00 MIDWEST ASPHALT SUPPLIES Mo 19302900* t .41 129D75 04/26/83 17.50 NATURE PRESERVED SUPPL IES PRO G 42 17.50 129076 04/26/83 135 00 TS CLOUD STATE UNIV TRAVEL TRAINING 135.00 47 129077 84/26/83 5.11 UNIVERSAL RED SERV RED OXYGEN 4e 5.11 129078 04126/93 261.50 ACT ELECTRONICS INCIC M NREPAIRAI Ts261.5 t 153'i 129079 04126/83 11.90 ALLAN SON BUSINESS OFFICE SUPPL IES 54,11.9 d 129DBO 04/26/83 46.42 FISHER PHOTO SUPPLY REPAIR MAISIT t4 9 MORSE - CLINTON PROFESSIONAL S ER Page 15 1983 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK AEGISTCR CHE N0. DATE AM WENDVt = ITE DESfB IP TI OF 2 46.42 * 4 129DSI 04/26/83 24.00 FREAD LESTER REFUND t S 2440 * 129082 154126 'fl9.2 FATTYS DELI — NATURE CTR TRIP e _ 109.25 i 160 328.90 FUND 01 TOTAL/12i 091.8_7 FU 03 TOTAL _ND 13 40000 FUND 43 TOTAL - -- -- 14 80099 FUND 41 TOTAL // 11451 is _60._00 FUND 5 TOTA 725 .DD FUND 58 TOTAL 17 10 *63 FUND 60 TOTAL 1a, 97 * 19 FUND 61 TOTAL/ 1 "i 10.753.86 FUND 65 TOTAL 20- 620 *OD FUND 76 TOTAL/ 21 2 , t423. T6 FUND 90 TOTAL 1OQ0 *00 FUND 94 TOTAL 23 79T.32 FUND 96 TOTAL 24 281----- -- 22__0s.52 28' Ztaj 301 31 32 33 INDICATES ITEMS FINA BY R =0NAL - 34135 " ' 36: 38 34 41' . 42! 64 - 48 - 47 48 r s1! 53 34 56 s7 uul z 35730156 CUDE LAR NY 148043 DOI 2 470520124 DOHERTY KATHLEEN M 0418"ODOUS 21 Ye 33- 3012 471400708 ZUER:HER JOAN L 0418,&OD009 119*65 0012 485*41 31 1 10 FA UST DANIEL F 041843010, CITY OF MAPLE w0000 AYROLL"CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8007 CHECK DATE 04w22*83 PERIOD-JADING 04-/ 5w83 PAGE DEPT•NO EM2L•NO EMPLOYEE IAME 34 CHECK -N0 AMOUNT CLEARE) ARLINE J 0418m03011 425*85 3002 206242318 EVANS BARRY R 0418MODO02 19121*32 lug? 2Z 4?fi-rlY443Z MOEL ER 110566,*53 MO 473664474 JAHN DAVID 1 0418-*03003 109s84 t 1 379o33 ELOGUIN -----'A LF R E d3 44 45 8 --0 U DU 4-69- 471322198 3010 469869481 SCHLEICMER JOHN IF 0418:03005 almoo t X, uuiu BET'TY-D 04-1-8-wWU16 475818 49 0011 475500285 MCPHERSON JOANNE F 04180-00006 0000 uul z 35730156 CUDE LAR NY 148043 DOI 2 470520124 DOHERTY KATHLEEN M 0418"ODOUS 21 Ye 33- 3012 471400708 ZUER:HER JOAN L 0418,&OD009 119*65 0012 485*41 31 1 3 4 15 1 ell, 6 10 FA UST DANIEL F 041843010,33 977*1 34 0022 469200614 AGEN ARLINE J 0418m03011 425*85 00,22 390444446 MATHEYS ALA NA K 0418".OD012 488*73 2Z 4?fi-rlY443Z MOEL ER R "A T A —041 8 = DD ul 3 It* uu 0022 473327550 VIGOREN DELORES A 0418 m00014 379o33 d3 44 45 3031 471322198 AURELIUS LUCILLE E 0418.00015 784*26 46 47 TT —BET'TY-D 04-1-8-wWU16 475818 49 19260*44 so 3032 475269515 SCHADT JOANNE L 0418.00017 1M2 UU32 57 0033 477288389 GREEN PHYLLIS C 04184&00018 529.69 59 0033--P- AMI-A A— 04-1 & w DD 019-1-96 61 3033 475620547 KELSEY CONNIE L 0418.03020 206985 0033 468364435 VIETOR LORRAINE S 0418.oOD021 401*99 00.33 19334*?l bs 013-4-do 1 it Sq 3034 474097528 STOTTLEMYER EDITH G 0418-00023 0000 3 0 54 MO 3 4 15 1 ell, 6 CITY OF MAPLEWOOOD clAYROLL CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8007 CHICK DATE 04 -22.83 PERIOD =NUNG 04 -15 -83 PAGE 2 DEPT -NO E0q L -N0 EMPLOYEE MARE.CHECK - NO AMOUNT CL EAR E3 0041 184440036 BA STYR DEBORAH A 0411 298087 t 0041 468461717 COLLT NS KENNETH V 0418 -00025 213.79 t 1 3047 _________39224D5b3______HAGEN THOMAS _..04,18 ou(y2-b 3041 477227S36 OMATH JOY E 0418.00027-3 ?S 41 t 0041 471502356 RICHIE CAROLE L 0418 -00028 315.41 t 1 0047 "4b8b0293 SVENDSEIf _________aANNE 0418= 0D 473. b8 I - 3041 1 •976.27 0042 477481364.ARNOLD DAVID L 0418 -00030 371.51 t 01142 4714021 15 ATCHT SON JOHN H 0418 -00031 690.30 t b? 68 98 bT_._.._....B.O VN 41 _ - ---- _. D042 468461930 CLAUSON DALE K 0418.00033 217.87 t 0042 4764461 19 OREGE R RICHARD .C 0418-00034 720.43 t 1 470267887 _` --g-RE'ET N OR MfiA L 04T o34 0042 469568516 MALWEG KEVIN R 0418 -00036 552940 t 0042 469820466 HEINZ STEPHEN J 0418 - 00037 563.56 t 360491_6 MIC'HA EL rII4'18 =00 03*5 b6 3042 47$525607 JAOUI TH DANIEL R 0418:03039 565.06 t 1 3042 3927611009 KARIS FLINT D 0418 -00040 440955 t 91342 4 r 2 272 3't T U S 0 WA 0 V D41 MI - ZTO : 0042 471563591 LANG RICHARD J 0418 -00042 1550.00 t 1 3042 468181347 MCNUL TY JOHN J 041 8.00043 177 t 004 74'60TSBb____ffEEHA Gi W JAMEN`c__._0.4.1 8-O9 0k4 3042 471627417 METTLER DANIEL 8 0418 - 00045 693.12 1 3042 469442163.MOSS :HTER RICHARD,M 0418 -00046 163.08 t Q4 753409 yu M , _0Rrc RA YX0N13 J 0 5- Q - 4T" 580: 0042 475323183 NELSON ROBERT D 0418.00048 754 t 0042 468462884 PELTI ER WTLLI AM F 0418 -oflD 049 593.34 t 3047 473520457" SKALMAN dO AL'd -- _ - W 4.18_ W1 :8 f D042 473548226 STAPN£GREGORY L 0418- 00051 624.20 t 1 0042 471 ?21204 STEFFE SCOTT L 0418 -m 00052 21206 t 1 fiO4Z - ?T S tTOZ3 f "SrILC^VER OR _T_'0V"= GJ'053" ; - 6 - 0iD42 4 ?1629204 STOCKTON DARRELL T 0418. 00054 685.89 t 0042 4742-60130 ZAPPA JOSEPH A 0418.0005 5 622.95 t f 0042 129982.47 D 0 3 -4T5 5 4154 34 BECKER RONALD 0 TWO-241639 0043 46944/789 GRAF DAVID M 041 8 -00057 539.04 t 1 31343 4764.01385 LEE ROGER W 0418ft03058 633955 t 1 00 &3 4T35bT79!MECAlitE3f _____ON A - __D418-13DD3'57 27 3043 468360918 NELSON CAROL M 0418 - 00060 819942 t 0043 471504316 RAZSKAZOF DALE E 0418 -00061 61605 t 5 6 4801 R Y_4lW 4 7D : U V-041 3-'137 0043 474486071 VORWERK ROBERT E 0418 - 00063 302.54 t 3043 469502201 YOUNGREN JAMES G 0418 -00064 648.74 t 1 I 1 I t 0043 4 ,9 32 8.5 6 CITY OF MAPLEWOOOD 2AY;ROLL- CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8001 CHECK DATE 04 -22.83 PERIOD rNDING 0 -15 -83 PAG= DEPT - N0 EM'L - NO EMPLOYE NAME WALTER CHECK - NO AMOUNT CLEARE3 t ) 3 D 4 ., 5 .._..._ _._ . _Z42 z Z 7 .- _.._._8C NA O fi .. _ - --Ate` A.E.O 0 fi8 = -03 Db S .— ____.-I •- ._ 73 4 4 8 8 P E C K O E N N I S -L -041 -8 0 4 0 0 --- ---- -- $ 9 . 77 -- ---- - - 3053 193 5 T. 5 0 PILLA TIKE DAVID 0046 468401999 CAHANES ANTHONY G 0418 -00067 146.59 t 3046 4776.27236 FLAUGHER 'JAYM L 0418- 03065 46405 t 1 ULLER JAMES D 04I8 -00069 4b7,' 0418 -00097 543.18 3046 473807030 MARTIN SHAWN M 041 8 -ODO?o 392.32 t 0046 . .4 72 365919 NELSON KAREN A 0418 -00071 455.51 t i 304"6 4060 all 3y A AeINE JANE L_01072 392*3Z t i 3046 475363333.WILLIAMS DUANE J 0418 -00073 490.09 t 1 3051 471440267 BARTA MARIE L 0418 -00074 260.62 01y5 47356487Z I E R KENNETH 6If 4TT 00 6 I71 0051 504483174 WEGWE RTN JUDITH A 0418 -00076 356962 t 0052 496508314 CASS WILLIA C 0418.00077 594.21 t i 0 z 3 2 b2 5 4 R ON `L 0 41 —ft IYU 4129 3052 502544337 HELEY RO'VALD J 0418 -03009 620.55 t 1 0052 471601383 HOCHBAN JOSEPH H 0418 -00080 565 26 t D - 5 2 4 R A NE_ ---- --M T C HA EE It 0 4'I' 8'= 0D_08'fi'Tf; 6' 4 0052 46836`3473 KLAUS ING HENRY F 0418.03082 587946 t i 1052 471500547 MEYER GERALD W 0418 -00083 512949 t i D52 468 66735 _JyR ET T NE R J *Tg 84 83 * 0052 472241484 RE INE RT.EDWARD A 0418w00085 625.38 t 30 470346224 ,TEV N HA2 RY J 0418 -03 08 172.07 t 1 D052 5.399.12 1 L IA JAMES 57 t 3053 167246109 GE ISS LER WALTER M 0418 -00085 5 74.11 t ) 0053 501464671 GESSELE JAMES T 0418.OD089 630935 t 0 0 5 3--73 4 4 8 8 P E C K O E N N I S -L -041 -8 0 4 0 0 --- ---- -- $ 9 . 77 -- ---- - - 3053 476622458 PILLA TIKE DAVID J 0418M03091 778. T5 t i 0053 472662522 PR IEBE WILLIAM 667.30 0418.00092 479.01 t i 0053 3 * 523.66 SIYU- i - TT A 0 - is_ _U" 8 00 09 3 389i,T t 1 3054 38901 D056 471562563 BREHE IM ROGER W 041 8f00094 498.94 t 3058 477602582 EOSO4 DAVID B 0418w00095 667.30 t i 0058_479541590.- _.___._E ---------- *---- 0058 4.715.01014 NADEA U EDWARD A 0418 -00097 543.18 t i 0058 468361720 NUTESON LAVERNE S 0418.09098 475.25 t 1 19 5 8- __...471365793 ___..0 WEN _--- _._.- __.__..G ER A L 0 _.____E_.0418 qw 0 0 09 9 ..-5 58022 3,265 *92 3 e s 6 T ljl 7, 71 • IC 30 , 32 33 34 q 36 37 38 1, 3 5 l6 97 ` as 49 jw ter 6 7 fl CITY OF MAPLE WOOOd 2AYROLL- CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 800?' CHECK DATE 04 -22.83 PER IOD =LADING 04 -15 PAGE.4 J' DEPT•N0 EM'L •N0 EMPLOYEE. 'NAME CHECK•NO AMOUNT CLEARE)i 0059 476249760 MACDONALD JOHN E 041 8.00100 460.39 3059 475501100 MULVANEY DENNIS M 0418 - 00101 615.31 t i 0059 19075.70 D 0 6'I _. _.__ _._,_i T73 0•fi b b _..,_.__R .. -LDI J . 4 - 1 = 0 OObi 468341493 KRUMMEL BARBARA A 0418.00103 137.98 1 0061 •4 732 60389 OOEGA RD ROBERT D 0418 -0D 10 4 878 t I PA ULI N ;fi B =Qi O 393:78 10 6 T 66 5 82a 1'9 STAPLES- 3061 1 9616.1 9 + 0062 473709024 SAVER ALAN H 041800106 0000' t K rt - 0062 47/447219 BURKE MYLES R 041 8 -0D 107 61.99 t 1 3ZDD6 . 2 770 - 91 "SZ - "9Egm r rOAW 0 4 = pTp' 1 D062 472303411*GUSINOA MELVIN J 0418.00109 Y70049 t 0.0 of t X1 i t , 3062 474924209 HAAG MATTHEW ROLAND J 0418 -00110 bB041 $ 00 T 3'b t i 0062 •473969184 'HU.NTER TONY 0418 -00112 129.85 t 0062 471748313 LIBMAROT K THOMAS 0 0418 -00113 3TD 0.00 t X 1T , 3.t1 b .. _____4-?35 6 5.5- - M A'RUS A ARK X418 3062 474078128 RASCHKE ALBERT F 0418.00115 DO 00 0062 477646662 SANDQUIS THOMAS J 0418 »OD116 0000 t K 1 w ObZ T6Z03t39 ApTA .._. _0 ...__ ..E- O TB =I1D T17"358 I1z 0062`474845176 SPANNBAUE2 MARTIN J 0418 -00118 0000 t x' 1 006 473 STARK RICHA E 041 -00119 0 .00 t K 1 411 0062 2944.02 0063 270483797 BLACK WILLI AM J 0418-0121 0.00 t x i 0063 471901502 BOYD -JEFFREY A 0418 -oD 122 0.00 c x U63 Z- 4- 7$UN I C RC "M41 - 11 - 0063 476924605 CASSEDAY ELIZABETH J 0413- 00124 0.00 1 0063 473684976 CASSE DAY _.._MARY K 0418.00 125 0.00 t X i 00.00 t x 0063..._ 3063 468684857.---- 4 7Z 844611 CE $tNt DALLU GE MAT THEW D 041 8 -00127 MOOD t- K 1 s D063 470880193 DELMON B - 1 LISA JERRY M 0418- 00128 0•QQ t x 0 4 i $ • t1 12 9 11. d K i 1 3063 2921 9 471884448 Dl E = GALBRAITH MICH4EL D 0418.03130 1.00 t K 1 0063 476686996 HE KAR IN J 0418.00131 O.OD t K ----- •-- - - -.__ 0063•4 3 415 K a AT U S JAMES M 0 41 = 0 013 D. 0 1063 469984S15 KRUMMEL 8E KY J 0415.03133 MOOD t K! .1 s, 0063 477829499 KRUM4- E ROGER ioof C 11418w03134 0000 t K i i_14-0 J i3.S - _ D: K AA 3063 C6996$7 474889!23 LANGELETT STEVEN E 0418 -00136 24.00 t 1 I 3063 469953553 LARKIN MOLLY A 0418.03137 K 1 fl 3 0 6 3 - - - - --473700729 ._..._NANR=MICHELE A 0418- dD'l 0.00- 0063 473869923 MCCULLOM JULIE A 1141 a•o0 001111 3063 474966/50 MIHEL ICH CINDI ROHALD " -... L 0419.03140 D.OD - .. Kt O.OD 0063 _ .._......473903RZ2__NIEIS EN.._...__ _----- ----041 8- 0.3'141 en rte CITY OF MAPLE WOOOD c'AYROLLwCMECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8001 CHECK DATE 04ft 22083 PERIOD :LADING 04a1 5ft83 PACE DEPT•NO, EM2Lm-NO EMPLOYEE IAIME CHECKoNO AMOUNT CLEARE) 3064 151440508 GREW JANET M 0418,003159 U-064 4 TI 4624 RORSI IELL '—jW I TH A 0413wWrO 0064 474542163 SOUTTER CHRISTINE 0418-00161 15*43 456916 4 23- 0000 389443993 CHLEBECK JUDY w IM 0418w00162 314952 4 D'a 47"40551 OLS' N p MmUU163 o.o rt -_ _ _ K I D063 4?7629!506 RAS-NC4KE JEFFE R Y J 04I9w00143 Doon xf I 4 298644 RICHIE STACY L 0418.00144 0000 X, ID063 00 63 4 69-9 2 72 21 R 0 T H SINCE C 04-lF8'--'00--1'4'57 rj* (10 x I 0063 468946400 RYDEN DENISE I,, 0418:0146 0000 468200109 KI I 0063 473686517 SANOGUIST KATHRYN E 0418m03-14?0000 t K 0 86 9U67--'SPANN RAUEV 0 A'W N ---R"-'O to41 . 8 '' 011 8 3001 47236933 IMAIDA D063 469742645 SPANNBAUER KATHLEEN G 0418,mOD149 0000 41800178 er 3063 477920170 STRAUS LAURA J 0413M03159 0000 t X! I U563-72 8 '21 911111-vw WA-N-C . Y ioeou x I 0063 471528238 TATE PETER W 041 8.00 152 8900 t x I 3063 470626422 TAUBMAI#DOUGLAS J 0418.00153 533.93 1: "Moo( No 116 3 9 9 41- 89-. WN'Lry 1`- -941-9 uu--n4 0 446 'J I x I 31063 4 T83041 VIETOR WENDY L 0418.*00155 0000 t U) 13063 47096 03 WALLACE JON T 0418m00156 0000 x I Oda3 4?5 IPV?3 Z----VAR 0 RERI L u4T*5ouui5r Q*uu x I 0063 396324246 WARD ROY 9 0418,*00158 257*50 3064 151440508 GREW JANET M 0418,003159 U-064 4 TI 4624 RORSI IELL '—jW I TH A 0413wWrO 0064 474542163 SOUTTER CHRISTINE 0418-00161 15*43 456916 423- 0000 389443993 CHLEBECK JUDY w IM 0418w00162 314952 4 D'a 47"40551 OLS' N p MmUU163 o.o rt -_ _ _1 054-of 9 0072 4776271 T8 E KSTR AND THOMAS G 0418-w00164 482*37 0072 475608505 JO"NSCN RANDALL L 0418=00165 544o91 0973 ----476o9U5?T- OSTROM 477058988 041 9 w uu 165 -rZ4,o U6 0073 041 8 +03168 724906 31 32 33 35 37 41 43 44 45 41 40 so 00?4 381520?76 WENGER ROBERT J 0418w00167 507*46 t se sq 3UT4 ___ -._ _ - - — - — fift 30 79 4-6'-* fil fil COUNT 00167 GRAND TOTAL 54 9785.01 0001 477058988 ANDERSON NORMAN G 041 8 +03168 181001 0001 483621318 BASTIAN GARY W 041 8- 00169 256957 t I,, 468200109 GRr-AVU JOHN "C-0418,40 170 2 50.6 -t i Dool 477367538 JUKER FRANCES L 0418-001il1 230*32 3001 47236933 IMAIDA MARYLEE *T 0418-mODI72 258048 006.4 0001 41800178 er chris-tine. 4 gg14 COUNT 00172 3S 10 9-67'e- 9 3 486.04 1: "Moo( No 446 'J I 1' 3 L tj 13 April 15, 1983 MEMORANDUM To: City Manager Barry Evans From: Chief of Police Kenneth V. Collins Subject: Advanced Life Support Care and Transportation Agreement C I met with Kathy Welte, representative of Health Resources Assistance Corporation. The purpose of the meeting was to enter into an agreement for Advanced Life Support services for the new Health Resources Center., which begins operation in late June 1983. Miss Welte needed the agreement for license purposes. I advised her that neither the Maplewood Police Department nor the City of Maplewood had entered into any written agreements with doctors' offices, clinics, etc.,'and that it was a normal function for us to respond to these locations when Advanced Life Support care is needed. This, however, did not satisfy Health Resource's needs. It was also pointed out to Miss Welte that we would not be utilized as a transportation service on Basic Life Support runs, and she understood this. I do not have any objections to entering into this agreement because it is something that we would respond to and handle normally should we be called. I am referring this to you for approval and signing. I would also like to point out that this agreement will be monitored quite cl-osely, and should there appear to be any problems, I would recommend that the agreement be terminated. KVC:js cc Paramedic F i l e Officer Vorwerk 1 r Health Resources A ssistance Corporation s `" AsService of Health Resources, Inc. March 28, .1983 Mr. Ken Collins Chief of Police office of Chief of Police 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN. 55109 Dear Chief Collins: APR 5 This letter serves to follow our conversation of March 14. The Health Resource Center will begin operations at 16 5 5 Beam Avenue in late June of this year, Health care services to be provided are outpatient surgery and after -hour and weekend urgent care. Hours of operation for outpatient surgery are 6:30 am to 5 :00 pm. The Urgent Care will be open from 5 :00 pm to 11 :00 pm Monday through Friday, and 9 :00 am to 11 :00 pm on weekends and holidays. Due to the outpatient nature of these services, A.L.S. ambulance transfer of patients should be infrequent. However, we would like to enter into an agreement with your department whereby we can call for A.L.S. transport when it is deemed necessary by the patient's physician. You indicated that you do not have written transfer agreements with institutions but, because we need one for licensing purposes, would not be averse to sighing one. Enclosed is a brief transfer agreement; please call me if it raises any questions or concerns, If I have not heard from you by mid May, I'll giveYg you a call to see how things are coming Thanks very much, Sincerely, jj- ttk -- Kathy Wa4y', Ambulatory Care Center Manager xw /1.dw Enc. Health Resource Center • 2696 Hazelwood Avenue * Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 612) 770 -9133 AGREE0\7 BET EDE leap 1 ewoo d Police Department And Health Resource Center, Inc. The Health Resource Center, Inc. ( "HRC ") seeks to enter into an agreement for effecting patient transfer to a hospital when the need has been determined by the patient is physician.' The Maplewood Police Department ND) provides Advanced Life Support CALS) transfer for area residents requiring such transportation, Therefore. 1, The Maplewood Police Department agrees to t)rovide ALS transport for HRC patients when requested to do so by" HRC. 20 IUD agrees to bill to patients directly or their insurance companies for charges for the transportation; HRC is not responsible for these charges. 3. MPD will use' its own routine protocols to care for patients in transit and accepts normal professional liability for such care provided while enroute . If a physician travels with his /her patient, the physician will provide medical direction during the transfer. 4. Whenever possible the NiPD will take patient or physician hospital preference into account, but is not required to do so. 5, This agreement is effective from the date of signing and can be terminated by either party by a written notice 60 (sixty) days in advance. Date: City Of Maplewood By: Its: Date: "y p Health Resource Center Inc. By • Qatw Salk. A W Its : 0011AU - A%J L%l 7 BETt T Maplewood Police Department And Health Resource Center, Inc. The Health Resource Center, Inc. ( "HRC ") seeks to enter into an agreement for effecting patient transfer to a hospital when the need has been determined by the pat ient ' s physician, The Maplewood Police Department (ADD) provides Advanced Life Support (ALS) transfer for area residents requiring such transportation. Therefore: 1. The Maplewood Police Department agrees to provide ALS transport for HRC patients when requested to do so by HRC* 2. NOD agrees to bill to patients directly or their insurance companies for charges for the transportation; HRC is not responsible for these charges. 3. AJPD will use' its own routine protocols to care for patients in transit and accepts normal professional liability for such care provided while enroute . If a physician travels with his /her patient, the physician will provide medical direction during the transfer . 4. Whenever possible the MPD will take patient or physician hospital preference into account but is not required to do so. 5. This agreement is effective from the date of s igning and can be terminated by either party by a written notice 60 (sixty) days in advance, Date:City Of Maplewood Its: Date: 9P3 Health Resource Center, Inc. BY: Its: c 3 1. e MEMORANDUM City Manager ' t FROM: Assistant City Engi == SUBJECT: Holloway Avenue Improvement, Project No. 81 -12, L- y....,.........__._ Contract Amendment DATE: April 29, 1983 Attached is information concerning additional work and amendments to the constructi contract proposed for the above - referenced project. The nature of the requested changes are as follows: Items 1 -4 represent changes requested by the City of North St. Paul to provide for repair of inplace water main and sanitary sewer facilities. All costs associated with these additions, $14,598.50,, w i l l be apportioned to the City of North St. Paul. Item 5 proposes the addition of 685 lineal feet of sidewalk along the south boulevard from Margaret Street to the west line of the open space property. This item has previously been considered and approved by th City Council. The cost for the additional sidewalk, $3,990.00, will be apportioned to the City of Maplewood. This item is 100 percent el l i gi bl e for State Aid reimbursement. We herewith recommend that the City Council approve the requested change in contract as delineated under change order No. 1. This will result in a net increase to the original contract amount of $18,588. mb Enc. 13 l SHORT- ELLIOTT -H ENDRICKSON INC. CHANGE ORDER April 1 8 { •DATE . -. 2 6 - 3 _ 9 ._._ _ - LOCATION: Maplewood , MN CHANGE ORDER NO 1. OWNER: C i tv of Mapl ewood PROJECT NO. Joint Holloway Ave. Imp. FILE NO.: 81168 1 Nature of Change Description and Cost: 1. New f ire hydrants are required because the existing hydrants were lead joint type. This was not known until the hydrant leads were exposed during construction. Furnish and install 7" hydrant - 5 EA @ $1,207.50/EA = $ 6 2. Repair existing sanitary sewer at 11 locations. Damaged sanitary sewer was discovered during T.V. inspections. @ Lump Sum = 3. Replace city furnished gate valve. in manhole as requested by City of North St . Paul 4. Cut watermain and install 6 x 6 tee and sleeve as requested by North St. Paul - 3 HR @ $ 2 94.0 0 /HR = 5. Construct 5' wide sidewalk, on south side of Holloway between Sta . 32 + 6 5 and 39 + 5 0 a s requested by Maplewood 7,238.00 441.00 11 3325 SF @ $ 1.20 /SF = 3,990.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER $18 Is Cost Actual or Estimated? ESTIMATED This authorizes Contractor to perform this work as part of Base Contract when signed by all parties. A _ ,_ , Recommended for Approval: Short - Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MID Ag 0 Approved for owner: By City of Maplewood By City of Maplewood Distribution By Cit f No t PCityoortSu Contractor 2 Owner 1 Resident Engineer 8y City of North St Paul Short- Elliott - Hendrickson, Inc. 222 East Little Canada Road Saint Paul, Minnesota 55117 IN MEMORANDUM F1 TO: City Manager Action by Council :. FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Rezoning (BC to R-2) Endorse LOCATION: English Street (Soo Line tracks to Skillman Ave.) Modiied.............. APPLICANT: City Council Reiec -- OWNERS: Elaine Beyer (2034 English Street) , Ralph Nuebel i ni a Fi shback ( 2022 En 1 i sh Street Burl i n ton or fern99Street), Virginia road and9 James and Margaret Sobota (2036 English Street) DATE: March 31 ,1983 SUMMARY Request Rezone this parcel from BC (business commercial) to a zone compatible with the city's land use plan. Reason for Request The city council initiated this rezoning as part of its "downzoning" program. This is where the zoning allows a greater intensity of land use than is proposed on the city's land use plan. Alternatives (in order of preference) I. Rezone this area to R -2 (residence district -- double dwelling) 2.. Amend the plan to RB (residential business), rezone the landscaping business and any of the existing homes requesting it to LBC (limited busi commercial) , and rezone the rest of the area to R -2. 3. Amend the plan to LSC, limited service commercial and rezone the area to LBC. 4. Amend the plan to SC, service commercial and rezone the area to BC (M), business commercial modified. Comments The intent of the land use plan is to l i m i t development in thi area to residential development. A BC zone allows uses that are not compatible with the adjacent homes to the east and north. An R -2 zone is recommended because it is the only zone that is consistent with. the land use plan and allows single 'dwellings as permitted uses. Under BC zoning the existing homes are nonconforming uses and can not be expanded without a conditional use permit from the city council. Mr. Sobota' s landscaping business, however, would become a nonconforming use under the R -2 zone. Mr. Sobota was told before he built his warehouse, that this land was planned for residential development. Mr. Sobota's interests would be protected in that he could continue or sell his , bus i ness without council approval while the surrounding residents woul be protected in that a public heari nand council approval would be required for any expansion or change to another- of commercial use. f:. The Planning Commission recommended that the R -2 zone be extended to the centerline of the Soo Line right -of -way to provide a buffer for future residences to the north. This is a common practice in most zoning ordinances. The Soo Line, however, has been abandoned and is up for sale. Bisecting the right -of -way into two 50 -foot wide zones would make the property difficult to sell. Section 36 -155 of City Code requires a setback of at least fifty feet for a commercial b u i l d i n g from a residential zone. If the R -2 zone is extended to the centerline of the 104 -foot wide right -of -way, a b u i l d i n g could not be constructed. on the south half. Recommendation Approval of the enclosed resolution (attachment one) rezoning this site to R -2 residence district - double dwelling). 2_ BACKGROUND Site Description Acreage of area to be rezoned: 5.6 Existing land uses: two single dwellings, undeveloped lots and a landscaping b u s i n e s s Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: single dwellings Easterl and Southerl railroad rights -of -way. The Soo Line to the south has- been abandoned and is proposed to be acquired by the state as a regional trail, Westerly: English Street and single dwellings Past Actions 5- 18 -78: Council approved a variance to allow Mr. Sobota to construct his land- scaping business on a lot that does not abut a maintained public street, subject to maintaining a driveway to English Street. 1- 10 -83: Council tabled a rezoning to R -1 and lot width and area variances for Mr. Nuebel until a rezoning for the adjacent lots is considered. DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Planning I. Land Use Plan designation: RM, residential medium density 2. The RM classification is designated for such housing types as single dwell- ings on small lots, double dwellings, townhouses and mobile homes. The maximum population density is 22 people for each net acre. The number of units for each acre would vary by dwelling type and bedroom mix. As an example, a two -and three - bedroom townhouse project with private roads would be allowed a maximum density of six units for each acre. A similar apartment r project would be allowed 7.5 units for each net acre. 3. Zoning maps should be updated as necessary to make both land use maps and zoning maps compatible. 4. Section 36 -485 of city code states that "In any instance where the city council or the planning commission is required to consider an exception or change in this chapter, including the zoning map, in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, the council or planning commission shall, among other things: a) Assure itself that the proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of this chapter.. 3 - b) Determine that the proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. c) Determine that the proposed change will serve the best interests andn conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare." 5. Zoning: BC, (business commercial) (See attachment five.) 6. The BC zone allows a side range of commercial uses. 7. The R -2 (residence district - double dwelling) zone in this area would allow single dwPl 1 i ngs with a minimum lot area of 7500 square feet and double d w e l l i n g s . 8. The LBC (1 imi ted business commercial) zone is limited to professional offices and similar uses approved by the city council. (See attachment six.) 90 - he BCM (bus commercial modified) zone is similar to the BC zone, but prohibits drive -up facilities for restaurants and outdoor commercial recreation. (See attachment six.) 10. The existing . landscaping business would become a nonconforming use if this zoning is approved. The following code requirements from section 36 -17 apply1 • a ) Any lawful use of a b u i l d i n g or land existing at the effective date of any provision of this chapter may be continued although such use does not conform to such provisions of this chapter. bY The substitution of one nonconforming use for another nonconforming use may be permitted by the city_ council by special use permit, as provided in article III of this chapter; provided that, such nonconforming use i determined by the city council to be of the same or more restrictive nature as the original nonconforming use. whenever a nonconforming use of a building or land has been changed to a use of a more restrictive cl or to a conforming use, such use shall not thereafter be changed to a use of a less restricted cl c) A nonconforming building wholly or partial destroyed by fire, explosion, flood or other phenomenon, or legally condemned, may be reconstructed and used for the same nonconforming use; provided that, building reconstruction shall b commenced within one year from the date the building was destroyed or condemned and shall be carried on without interruption. d) If a nonconforming use of a building or land is voluntarily abandoned and ceases for a continuous period of one year or more, subsequent use of such building or land shall be in conformity with the provisions of this chapter. e} No existing building or premises devoted to a use not permitted in the district in which such building or premises is located -s be enlarged, reconstructed or structural altered, unless: 1) Required by law or 9 overnment order; or 4_ O, 2) There would not be a s i g n i f i c a n t affect, as determined by the city through a special use permit, on the development of the parcel as zoned. ADMINISTRATIVE Procedur I. -Planning Commission recommendation 2. City Council holds a public hearing and makes a decision. At least four votes are required for approval. mb Enclosures 1. Resolution 2. Location Map 3. Property Line Map 4. Land Use Plan 5. BC District 6. LBC /MC(M) District 5- Resolution Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular1ar meeti n of the '9 g City CounciloftheCityofMaplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Counci Chambers in . P said City on the day of , 1983 at 7:00 .m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, busi to R -2 residence district (double dwel 1 i ng) for the following-described area: An area bounded b the cen ° •y e 1 i nes of Englishsh Street, Skillmanlman Avenue and the Burlington Northern right -of -way, and the north 1 i ne of the Soo Line right -of -way. This area includes block one, lots 1 -27 Gladstone Addition; WHEREAS, the. procedural history of this rezoning As as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City -of Maplewood, pursuant to chapter 36, article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on April 4, 1983. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 1 3998 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuanttolaw. All persons present . at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered rep ortsandrecommendationsofthecitystaffandPlanningCommission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL aCLth t the above. descri bed rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, ur ose and intentPPofthezoningordinanceandComprehensivePlan. 2. The proposed change will not substantially i 'ure or detract from they use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood,and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or, plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. Adopted thi day of 1983. Seconded by Ayes t , STATE OF MINNESOTA } a COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD } I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointednted Cl erk of the CityyofMaplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1983, 'with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of 1983, City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota ROAD C z z EDGE HILL RD. j h r 6S z DEMO T LL AVE_ a . ROORook AVE.2 0 U) z AV 11 th AVE. RQ SEX ILK GERVAIS AV E. RVAI AV L G 6NDVITWI COURT 36 IVIK IN 5071t.7-1 ASTLE AA 1 73 SHERREN AVE OPE AVE. AV GMsr B3 S iii'' I[EN7-AVJ III COPE LARK W p L AVE. z RDLAURI0 1LAURJIERD LARK T. ELAN DI 25 1 SANDI 30- 2 z 65 7,JUN [AVE suURKEAVE K 1Z AYE t ;, {, a : wT F-: ELDRIDG J AVE. WAFILEW800It PUBLIC WDRKS T ' . LMONE AVE.P4 > BLDG.CA KIL VA N m AVE. z NA . 000i awc Vj Ros WOOD AVE. 29 2640 No 2400 No 2160 N. FROsjj N AVE. FRISNIE AVE. 1 ..AVF,.] 1 = C PH 1A AVE W ut I.- z x z Ic k.i2 LJA P IL NTEU I r] su R W Wakefield cc ocLOAe- tSOPMiAVEch o z z PRI AV ST. PA A "i R PL KI AVE. PRICE X AV aC IF 10 LOCATION MAP Attachment Two 4 lot 4= 41 'If t A Lij !i 2q54 • , All 1 t SABOTA LAN -,DSAPING - 2043_ _ , STORAGE i - 2 0 3 1T =: - - f 202 - -, ..:. :..:.::: . =..;-:Cr7.1 : Y i .... # 7-02 _ r os I ' • : max _.'_" t X02 :. . : Y BURL I s s... j .• a ... -:(' : :v : _ • -. T _ •• -- --JJ fir• .." dt• :: :: t•.:::f• j - i 2001 _ f ( NORTHERN 01 i •---- : -- PROPERTY F ,/ j1t• ...T _ -; _tom . Vii. : •- •.•.•- 3f ••_ t ! ^rti,:s!{'= sQ+yyy/ • — •_ - .• ' Y 9 ...'rM• ,— ..r.A•.Yt3w:Yr4 1 » M ' •i ' .n _93 3' 4 Ic y I a ~ IA _ ALL r FIJI OEM VIP ELI77— nt f •u,.- f • f ' _ ... - t ( . . ` ,,,,' 9 . ! - . •' • , r ' fi I I '- -=- i ( / { 'i ,• e 1 k% PROPERV LINE MAP 00 Attachment Three With Zoni 47. 71 7 memo o CD n Cb Cwj im 44 inter Ing mrind al arterial Sherwood Glen IiEIGi130 "MOOD LAND USE PLAN Attachment Four, inte s L11 it mom AND UUMMFRC1AL D1STR)CT Attachment Five Sec. 36 -153. Use regulations. In a BC Business and Cor=ercial District in the city, the follow - ing regulations shall apply. . 1) Permitted uses: A building may be erected or used and a lot may be used or occupied, for any of the followlng purposes, end rio other. _ a) Apartment for one Tarnily in combination uith business _ use. b) Motel, motel, tourist borne, rooming Douse or boarding. souse. - - c) Retail store, restaurant, offiice, agency, studio bari person sertiice and craftsmen's Aop, mortvau. - d) Automobile sales agency, used car lot, paiking garage or lot, provided all facilities are located and all services are coi;d.ucted on the lot e) N - wspaper publishing, job printing establishment W Theater. g) Hand or automatic self - service launAry. h) Bakery or confectionery shop, for the production of ar- ticles to be sold only gat retzil on the premises i) Public garage or motor fuel station; provided that a license to operate such business is first obtained from the city council pursuant to chapter 17 of this Code- All public garages and motor fuel •stations must be so lo- _ sated on the site and the site • shall te of the size as provided in section 36 -156 of this dig ision h defines - hinds of operation, site area required and other data relating to such business. - 61 Any use of the same general character as any of the above permitted uses; provided that, no use which is noxious or hazardous shall be permitted. 2) Special eYCeption.s: The following uses are allowed when authorized by the city council as a special exception: a) All uses permitted in R -3 Residence Districts, exceptp the construction of dwelling houses permitted in divi- sions 3 and 4 of this article, R -1 and R -2 Residence Districts. - b) Processing and distributing station for milk or other ' beverages, carting or hauling station. c) Place of amusement, recreation or assembly, other than a theater, when conducting indoors. d) Yard for storage, sale and distribution of ice, coal, fuel oil or building materials, when enclosed within a fence of not less than six (6) feet in height, but not including junlyard, salvage, automobile or other wrecking yard. Code 1965, § 907.010; Ord. No. 232, § 3, 10- 19 -67; Ord. No. 256,11- 20 -69; Ord. No. 402, § 1, 8- 12 - 76) -MWW 46 I3 R' tit tHl,t7t'ittYl 3 1X Sec. 36 -154. LBC Limited Business Comm •Commercial lstrct. The LBC Limited Business Commercial District is b er e estab- .lisped and may be authorized by the council in those locationsherearegularBCBusinessCommercialDistrictabutsaresiden-tial district, the intent of this provision being o make omodifiedcommercialare possible a ea in the nature of a buffer zone Rybereln the ,uses, subject to prior council approval, v%i11 be limitedted to profes-sional offices and such other sirnilar uses as the noun 'cif may deter- •mine. The proposed plan of use in any sucb LBC limitedrnted businesscommercialdistrictsba.11 be submitted to the council for final de-termination and approval. (Code 1965, J 907 Ord . No. 232, 310- 19 -67' Ord No . 256,11- 20 -69; Ord. No_ 402, § 1, 8 - 12 - 76) Sec. 36 -155. BC(Af) Commercial District (.Modified ). • • - - 1. INTENT. The BC (H), Business Corznercial -Modi i 'f ed restrict is intendedtoprovidefortheorderlytransitionbetweenmoreIntensive 'e c ,, -- zne r c z a lusesandlowormediumdensitypresidentialareas. Restrictions on, butnotlimitedto, building height, setbacks orientation , p ar king .lot location,or ,)Pca t i on of building entrances may be requiredred to ensure 'Q e co;:patibil>ltywiabuttingresidentialuses. 2 . USE REGULATIONS,, A bui may be-ery or used, and a lot may be used or occupied, for any of the foll n purposes , and no ofgPP , ber: a. Retail store; professional administrativee of f ces; bank or savings _and loan; personal service, craftsmen's sb op, mortuary b. Hotel or motel C. Walk -in theatre - d. Job printing shop e. Bakery or cand shop producing goods for on-premises retail sales f. Any use of the same general character as an o 'y f the above pe rmI t t ed uses, as determined by the City Council, provided that no use vbichIsnoxiousorhazardousshallbeermitted.p 3. The following uses when authorized by the City ouncil b means use permit: y y of a special a. All uses permitted in R - Multiple D .;ellin Districts exce $ , pt the con - struction of houses permitted in R - 1 and R - 2 districts. b. Laundromat or similar automat self- service laundry c. Restaurant, where there are no drive --u order winpos or serving offoodtopatronsIntheirautomobiles. All cooking dors must be controllf centj residencestoasnottobenoticeabletoadjac8 1. xd. Place of amusement, recreation, or assembly other than a theater 'wLe re there are no outdoor a c t i of t l e s.f Rezoning: English Street (Skillman Avenue to the tracks) Secretary Olson said the proposal is to rezone the property from BC to R-2 . Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyoney present who wished to comment. Jim Sobota, 1290 E. Nebraska, owner of the property at 2036 English Street, did not think it would be appropriate to have residential development next to a railroad track. He is opposed to any zone change. Elaine Beyer, 2034 English Street, opposed to the rezoning to residential with multiple d w e l l i n g . Ralph Nuebel, Forest Lake, said he previously asked for a rezoning of the property between 2034 and 2022 English Street. The Planning Commission, at that time, recommended approval of the zone change. He did have the required signatures for the petition for zone change. He is in favor of the zone change. Virginia Fishback, 2022 English Street, questioned, how this would affect her property. Staff explained what types of uses would be permitted under the residential zoning district. Ms. Fi shback indicated she would not mind construction of single dwellings on the property, but not duplexes. Mr. Nuebel said he did not request a double dwelling. He asked for a single - family dwelling. He felt the R -2 zoning would be better than business commercial. Mr. Sobota commented on the procedures he had to follow to obtain permission to construct his storage building. Mr. Nuebel questioned if English Street was to be widened. Staff indicated he was not aware of any proposal. Commissioner Fischer mov the P Commi ss i o re -nd_tothe City Council a _ of the res rez n -site-to-R-2, residence district, double dwel 1 i n . Commissioner Pel 1 i sh seconded Ayes- -Commi ss i oners Axdahl , Barrett, Ellefson, Fischer, Pellish, Prew, Sigmundik, Whitcomb. MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Width Variance LOCATION: English Street APPLICANT/OWNER: Ralph Nuebel DATE: march 25, 1983 SUMMARY Action by Counc r Endo._rs o ; 9 Yoasfiod Rejec C Doto .._.... .y.........,._....._ .... Reque Approval of a lot width variance Proposal 1. The applicant is proposing to build a single dwelling. 2. The following l width variance is needed: a. Lot Width - -60 feet b. Code Requirement - -75 feet of lot width at the thirty -foot setback l i n e c. Variance Needed--fifteen feet The lot to the north is already developed with a - single dwelling on a sixty -foot wide Tot. Staff can see no reason to deny this variance, assuming that council rezones this lot to a residential zone. If council deni a rezoning, a single dwelling cannot be constructed and the variance would not be needed. Recommendation Approval of the enclosed resolution (attachment three) approving a lot width variance of fifteen feet. BACKGROUND Site Description 1. Lot dimensions: 60 by 155 feet 2. .Exi sti n 9 Land Use: undeveloped Surrounding Land Uses Northerly and Southerly: single dwellings Westerly: 9terl : En lish Street and single dwellings Easterly: A meta p 91polebuildingdin used for the storage of landscaping equipment Pas Actions 6 - 7 - 79: Council approved a lot width and area variance for a 60 by 135 foot parcel on West Kenwood Drive width variance of five feet and an area variance 10- 25 -82. Council approved a lot wi of 550 square feet for a parcel on Lark Avenue. residence district ( single dwel 1 i ng ) n 1 tabled a rezoning to R 1 res -1-10-83: Co u c . nti 1 a rezoningn for the adjacent and a l width and area variance for Mr. Nuebel u 9 If an R -2 zone is approved , a l area variance would not lots i s considered. be needed. Planninq sit1. Land Use Plan Designation. Rm, Medium Density Residential. This classification s designated 0 9forsuchhousing types as single - fami houses on small lots, two-family homes, townhouses, and mobile homes. The maximum population density is 22 people per net acre. gZ.Zoning: BC, business commercial 3. Statutory requirements: in findingsStatelawrequiresthatthefollowings be made before a variance can9 be granted: would cause undue hardshio because of circumstances a. Strict enforcement . unique to the individual property under consideration. kee inb. The variance would be n p g with the spirit and intent of the ordi connection with the granting of a variance means Undue hardship as used in corm the property in que stion cannot be out to a reasonable use ff used under con - fficial control The plight of they landowner is due dti allowed by the - ner and the circumstances uniqu eated by the '1 andow , to crcums u to his property, not crq variance, f granted , w 1will not alter the essential character of the locality. mb Enclosures: 1. Location Map Property Line Map 23: Variance Resolution - KOHLMAN AVE. ir ROAD G" x h CL W mi DEMONT i t3 a C ROrJK AVE.2 61 m SEkT GERVAIS AVE. G ANDVI A VIKI DR. LARK vAvE. 25 eke TY o ILELANDI < O t J G JUM TION AVE. l Q U v S RK J o aYA R R ire 28 FROST 0 so 00 or 6. Z7 F M`ON AVE. 2 ` a ; z A FRISSIE AVE. IL 3 !I i PLEY AYE. • Lake 30 PH IA AVE V) Pho /en ~ Z o 62 L A P NT 30 SH£RREN AVE COPE AVE LARK AVE . .: ys L A LAURIE RD. Z [ LAI i025 = T 2 z. [:AV z r- h ¢ YF. RKE ¢_ L V . E, BU KE ELDRIDG AVE. 8 4' cLMON T o AVE. WN SKI LMA IN m AVE. = NA RIS rr q Ros wo RY AN Q rJ VE as tl &.-d L.-AP a! SU Km EAR ` H W sD Wokefie /d W j ` < SOP AV Lok e = PRI E A GJ m AV flFl rin lig ST. LOCATION MAP r •- cj / sy A 4 P i O M r.10 a to t 1 Q 2-2 r .•z,05 IL C41 TZ -1 Ia9 ' h I r 11c y 2 ` Z9 i 83 .' 7 5 . .. III I o 40 , t4t2b1 1 9 re e ..11 SABOTA LANDSCAPING „ PMENT STORAGE p 21 . EQUIPMENT ,v 1 1 1 4 iL z _ • r1 "'li 14,11 1 1 L tj LT 9 wr Iscc 2 L 22 w _...._ ..._ _ co zi 20 Vr 18 9 r s j 4R nr to LSo49\e 8 •p 41 Its ec, • f Z..L: i 14 d` lk AV Ic cap yam f ucm41co 15 Alf 0 PROPERTY LINE MA With Zoninq Ralph Nuebel Property 2 Attachment Three: Variance Resolution Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council Chambers in said City on the day of 1983 at 7:00 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS,, Ralph Nuebel applied for a variance for the following-described property: Lot three and the south half of lot two, block one, Gladstone Addition. WHEREAS, section 36-69-of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires a lot width of 75 feet; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to build on a sixty -foot wide lot, requiring a variance of fifteen feet; 141HEREAS , the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. Thi s vari ance was zppl i ed for on October 27, 1982. 2. This variance was reviewd by the Maplewood Planning commission on December 20, 1982. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said variance be approved. 3. The !Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 1983 to consider this variance. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and Planning Commission. NOW THEREFORE A BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described variance be on the basis of the following findings of fact 1 There is a hardship since the property could not be put to reasonable use if the code requirements were strictly enforced. r 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of, the ordinance. 3. The city has approved comparable lot width and area vai antes in the past. 4. The lot to the north is only sixty feet wide. I Adopted this day of 198_. bSecondedy Ayes-- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD } I. the undersigned, ed, bei n 9 ytheduly qualified and appointed Clerk of the City ood Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the of Mapl ew attached and foregoingforeofn extract of minute of a regular meeting of the original on file in ym office and the same is a full, true and complete transcript there- from insofar as the same relates to Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of , 1983. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota s aar StreetB. Rezoning and Variances--English Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting approval of a zone change to R -1, and approval of lot width and lot area variances. Staff is recommending approval of both requests. The applicant was not present Commissioner Fischer mov the _P1 anni_ng___Commi sson recommen to the City Council approval of the resolution rezoning the subject site from BC to R - __Approval is based on the fi that: 1. R -1 zoning would be consistent with the Land Use Plan since single- fami dwellings on small lots are permitted. 2. A single dwelling would be consistent with the adjacent development along English Street. 3. Density r as listed in the Land Use Plan would not beq exeeded. Commissioner Hejny seconded Ayes -- Commissioners. Axdah Barrett, Elle HfsonFischerHe 'n , Howard, Pel 1 i sh, Prew, Whitcomb Commissioner Fischer m the P1 ann ng Commission recommend to the Counci approval of the _resoluti _granting__a 1_ot width_ and areaCitypp _ - v on the basis that: 1. There is a hardshi p since the property could not be put to reasonable use i f the code requirements were strictly enforced. variance would be i n keepingn2. The v p 9 with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. 3. The city has approved comparable lot width and area variances i n the past. Commissioner Hejny seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl Barrett, El l efson, Fischer, Hejny, Howard, Pel 1 i sh, Prew, Whitcomb l MEMORANDUM Acticn by C o tom. c i 3 To: City Manager Ero FROM: Director of Community Development Mod e d. SUBJECT: Rezoning (M - 1 to R -3 and R -2) • .,` LOCATION: Clarence Street (tracks to Skillman Avenue) ' APPLICANT: City Council t, - NM---- OWNERS: Block 9-- Betram and Pauline Getsung Apartments -- William Olmer, Victor Tedesco, Patsy Monno and Joseph Lombardo 2010 Clarence -- Arnold and Gladys Pfarr; Anthony Caron and W.L. Dufresne The Burlington Northern - Rai 1 road DATE: March 28, 1983 SUMMARY Request Rezone this area from M -1 (light manufacturing) to a one compatible with the city's land use plan. Reason for the Request The City Council initiated this rezoning as part of its "downzoning" program. This is where the zoning allows a greater intensity of land use than is pro- posed on the city's land use plan. QQmments The M -1 zone is obsolete and could lead to development that is incompatible with surrounding residences. The abandonment of the Soo Line and possible conversion to a trail further supports the residential designation on the land use plan. R -2 (residence district -- double dwellings) zoning is recommended for 2010 Clarence Street. An R -2 zone permits single dwellings with a minimum lot area of 7500 square feet and double dwellings. An R -2 Zone accomplishes the intent of the plan for multiple dwellings, while allowing the existing home to become a conforming use. The house is now a nonconforming use, which means that it cannot be ex 'paneled without a conditional use permit. The lot to the south is already zoned R -2. The apartments are also a nonconforming use. An R -3 (multiple) zone would make tAm a permitted use* An R -3 zone is also recommended for block 9, because an R -3 zone all ows . the highest use of the property that is consistent with the plan ang there are already apartments to the eastv The R -3 zone would allow about.* ghteen apart- ment units or fourteen townhouses. Alternatives would be an R -3r, (townhouse) zone, which would limit development to townhouses, or an R -2 zone. 1 The Planning Commission recommended that the R -2 zone be extended to the center- line of the Soo Line right -of -way to provide a buffer for future residences to the north. This is a common practice in most zoning ordinances. The Soo Line, however, has been abandoned and is up for sale. Bisecting the right -of -way into two 50- foot wide zones would make the property difficult to-sell. Section 36 -155 of City Code requires a setback of at least fifty feet for a commercial bpi l di ng from a residential zone. If the R -2 zone is extended centerline of the 100 -foot wide right -of -way, a bui 1 ding could not be constructed on the scth half. Recommendation Approval of the enclosed resolution rezoning 2010 Clarence Street from M -1 to R -2 and the rest of the area to R -3. yM t 2 BACKGROUND Site Description Acreage to be rezoned: 6.5 Existing land uses: Block nine is undeveloped. three apartment buildings and a single dwelling. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Skillman Avenue and single dwellings Block ten is occupied by It Easterly: Gladstone Park Southerly: Abandoned Soo Line right -of -way. The State proposes to acquire the right -of -way for a regional trail. Westerly: Burlington Northern tracks Past Actions 7- 29 -65: Council rezoned block 9 from R -1 (residence district -- single dwelling) to M -1. 1- 20 -66: Council rezoned the site now occupied with apartments from R -1 to M -1 light manufacturing) . There were no specific development plans at the time. 1968: The existing apartments were built. 11- 10 -69: The city's zoning map was readopted, which included an M -1 zone for 2010 Clarence Street. 4- 15 -82: Council approved a lot area variance and rezoning for lot 11, block 10 from R -1 to R -2 (residence district --- double dwelling). Planning 1. Land Use Plan designations: a. Block nine: RM, medium density residential b. Block ten: RH, high density residential (See attachment four.) 2.. The RM classification. is desi.gnated for such housing types as single dwellings on small lots, double dwellings, townhouses and mobile homes. The maximum population density is 22 people for each net acre. The number of units for each acre would vary by dwel 1 i ng type and bedroom mix. As an example, a two and three bedroom townhouse Jro 'ect with privatevate roads would be allowed aP maximum density of six units -for each acre. A similar apartment project would be allowed 7.5 units for each acre. 3. The RH classification is designated. for such housing types - .apartments, two- family homes, townhouses, nursing homes, dormatories, or elderly housing. The maximum population density is 34 people for each net acre. The number of units for each acre would vary by dwelling type and bedroom mix. As an 3 example, a two and three bedroom townhouse project with private roads would be allowed a maximum density of nine units for each acre. A similar apart- ment project would be allowed twelve units for each acre. 4. Zoning maps should be updated as necessary to make both land use maps and zoning maps compatible. 6+ Section 36 -485 of city code states that "In any instance where the city council or the planning commission is required to consider an exception or change in this chapter, including the zoning map, in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, the council or planning commission shall, among other things: a) Assure itself that the proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of this chapter. b) Determine that the proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. c) Determine that the proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare." 6. Zoning: M -1 7. The M -1 zone allows commercial, office, warehouse and light manufacturing uses. (See attachment five.) 8. The R -3 zone allows townhouses and apartments at the maximum density specified in the Comprehensive Plan. 9. The R -2 zone allows single dwellings with a mi nimim lot area of 7500 square feet and double dwellings. 10. The single dwelling and apartments are nonconforming uses. The following code requirements from section 36 -17 apply: a) Any lawful use of a building or land existing at the effective date of any provision of this chapter may be continued although such use does not conform to such provisions of this chapter. b) The substitution of one nonconforming use for another nonconforming use may be permitted by the city council by special use permit, as provided in article III of this chapter; provided that, such nonconforming use is determined by the city council to be of the same or more restrictive nature as the on gi na1 nonconforming use. whenever a nonconforming use of a building or land has been changed to a use of a more restrictive classification or to a conforming use, such use shall not thereafter be changed to a use of a less restricted classification. c) A nonconforming building wholly or partially destroyed ty f i re, expl o- sion, flood or other phenomenon, or legally condemned, may be reconstructed and used for the same nonconforming use; provided that, b u i l d i n g re- reconstruction shall be commenced within one year from the date the building was destroyed or condemned and shall be carried on without" Interruption. d) If a nonconforming use of a building or land is voluntarily abandoned and ceases for a continuous period of one year or more, subsequent use of such building or land shall be in conformity with the provisions of this chapter. e) No existing building or premises devoted to a use not p-ermitted in the district in which such building or premises is located--.shall be enlarged, reconstructed or structurally altered, unless: 1) Required by law or government order; or 2) There would not be a significant affect, as determined by the city through a special use permit, on the development of the parcel as zoned. Procedure 1. Planning Commission recommendation 2. City Council holds a public hearing and makes a decision. At least four votes are required for approval. jW Enclosures 1.resolution 2.location map 3.property line map 4.Land Use Plan 5.M -1 zone 5 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City CounciloftheCityofMaplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the CouncilChambersinsaidCityonthedayof1983at7.00 p.m. The following members were present: The=fol 1 owi ng members were absent: WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council initiated a rezoning for '9 the followingproperties: lots 1 -10 and 12 -22 block ten and block nine, Gladstone AzoningboundaryshallextendtotheAddition. on. The westerlycenterlineneoftheBurlingtonNortherntracks. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezon i n i s as follows.'o •'9 ws. 1. This rezoning was initiated by the Maplewood City Council,y 1, pursuanttochapter .36, articlee VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed b the MaplewoodewoodYp Planning Commission onApril4, 1983. The Planning Commission recommended to thee City Councilthatsaidrezoningbe . 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing ong '1983 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published andmailedpursuanttolaw. All persons resent at said 'P d hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. TheCouncilalsoconsideredreportsandrecommendationsonsofthecitystaffandPlanningCommission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCILL that . I. Lots 7 -10, block ten, Gladstone Addition are rezoned from M -1 (lightmanufacturing) to R -2 (residence district -- double dwelling). 2. Lots 12 -22 and 1 -6, block ten, Gladstone Addition are rezoned fromM -1 to R -3 (multiple). 3. Block nine, Gladstone Addition is rezoned from M -1 to R -3. (Zon i ngdistrictboundariesshallextendtothecenterline 's of adjacentstreetsandrailroadrights-of-way.) 7 pproval is based on the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with t -he spy ri t, purpose and intentofthezoningordinanceandComprehensivePlan. Aw 2. The proposed change will not substantial '1y injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the nee 9 hborhood and that the the proposed 3. The proposed of the commui Adopted this Secionded by use of the property adjacent to the area included in change or plan is adequately safeguarded. change will serve the best interests and conveniences ii ty, where applicable, and the public welfare, day of 1983. Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY )SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersigned,being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the City of Maplewood,Minnesota,do hereby certify that I haveyy carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood,held on the day of 1983, with the original on file i n my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this rezoning,, Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of 1983. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota v, I ; Lw Cr A ZIP pryINNOF - t 22 T. D LA. Ke Ile r Lake D{ W is Z ' Z E DvICNILL A0. W i Q J 65 h a DEMONT AVE. O `ROOK AVE. cn _ or AV lit m - AVSEXTT GERVAIS AVE. ~ VACS T P C ^ A` G ANDVIEN' 3s Vf:KI SHERR N AVE COPE AVE.S A LARK AYE h LARK AVE, ~LARK AVE. _ - TY LAURIE RD. ¢ LAURIE0 = C RC Y 0 10 ILELAND O 25 = _ I oo N D JUN''TIQN AVE Z h .`8" Y '' Q = A Y E . 6 U 1 KURKE T ELDRIDG - AVE. ; A.• M=..E ?POD Lb ccLT AVE W PUBL IC WORKS AK > QLDG.E . & N Q v = : Q KfLLMA 0 :4 AVE. _ HA Ilt / R I -" Cx RCS r0OD AVE. 4 RY IN y , F r• ` , t Cam.- ~ - Q ' !* _4 2 FROST ' v A:'It. ~ ., U W) h 28 s L 5n 2] W FE kT.ON AVE. 4C 49 > SU R ' 4 a 62 49 bA W W (t O FR ISQtE AVE 2 Q Wakefield W Lake 'p `SD P IA AVE t i tLoires ¢ _ 29 sop ' . ,. e Pholen z o o z a = W PR Z PRi E AV GJ N j •. r " 2 W _ L A P NT AV 3 1 r] r]64 r ---- - 65ST. PAUL Z1 LOCATION MAP Attachment Two 4 N LOCATION MAP Attachment Two 4 N M a ir T-I L in Il - tANDSCARJ G 46- Cn CY) An -is sh. Cr, Cy CV) Cy, 46 lb av L R ' _ .s i "s 1 7r 4 ON Z E t. PROPERTY LINE MAP * Attachment Three Iv l 7) .. — j I Y S •. f d O d some no Plow Attachment Four Sherwood Glen NEIGH 30 "IOCD LAND USE PLAY 2!ilnlaaor coy lector .......e.... WM ^ -- -- ma'or collector infareh .2 n a T i AL1dc.W11UII r i ve V DIVISION 9. M -1 LIGHT MANUFACTURING DISTRICT Sec. 36 -186. Permitted uses. In M -1 Light Manufacturing Districts, a buildingorusedanda g fly be erectedlotmaybeusedoroccupiedforanyofthefollowspurposesandnoothern , provided that following o use which is noxious orbazardousshallbepermitted: - 8) Any use permitted in a BC Business and Cafhrn erci al Dis ' _trict and-SC Shopping Center Distric _if the council is satis-fied that such use will not interfere with ro er develooftheM-1 Li ht M P P g Manufacturing District, but not otherwise. b) wholesale business establishments. c) Trucking yard or terminal- d) Custom shop for making articles or roducts sold ' the P o d at retail on premises. e) Plumbing, heating, glazing, paintingg roofin ventilating and electrical contractors, black Psmithsho car - pentry, soldering and welding shop. f) Ward for storage, sale and distribution of ice coal fuel i ma o orbuildingmaterials.i als. g) Commercial place of amusement, recreation or assembl h) Bottling establishment. G) Manufacturing as follows: I) Canvas and canvas products. II) CIothing and other textile products, not including n ufacture of textiles. g an III) Electrical equipment appliances iPPsandsupplies, manu- facture and assembly of, not including heavy electrical machinery. IV) Food products, combining or rocessin of notPg includingmeatandfish. V) Jewelry, clocks, watches. VI) Leather products, including luggag and shoes.VII) Medical, dental or drafting equipment, optical goods.l _ P P g VIII) Musical instruments. IX) Perfumes, pharmaceutical products eom u.n . er Po ding of rub-b products and synthetic treated fabrics, not includ- ing rubber and synthetic processing.X) Small products from the followin previouslygPy preparedmaterials: Cork, feathers, felt, fur, glass, bait, horn a rplastics, shells. P P , XI) Tool, dye and pattern makin - .P ing, and similar small ma- chine shops. XII) Food products, including furniture and boxes. 0 ) Carpet and rug cleaning. k) La un ....dry, dry cleaning or. dyeing plant. 1) Laborator esearryh, experimental and testing. m) Any use of the same eneral charsg cter as any of the above-permitted uses, tiwhenauthorizedasaspecialexceptheCitu,conc P p on by n) Accessory use on the same lot witb and customarily inciden-W to any of the above - permitted uses. Code 19 65, § 909.01.0;Ord. No. 395, § 1, 5- 13 - 76) a r C. Rezoning: Skillman -9 nand Clarence Street, Secretary Olson said the pro osal iR -3. P s to rezone from M - to R -2 and Commissioner Fischer moved the Planni •C. ity Cou 1 a — - ---- Commiss on recommend to thn._ p_proval of the resolution rezoning 201MiltoR -2 and the rest of 0 Clarence Street frotheareatoR -3. Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes -- CommissionBarrett, E11 efson, Fischer, Pe] 1 i sh Ayes Axdahl,Prew, Sigmundik, Whitcomb D. Rezoning: Gervais Avenuee (west of Whi Bear Avenue) Secretary Olson said the ro o to P p sal i to rezone the property from LBCR -3 . George Wessin, said his father was owner property located r of the property, asked if theproPytedsouthofGervaiswouldbezonedRalso. Secretary Olson indicated the ro ert •P p y wouldd rema n LBC Mr. Wes s i n said they were in agreemeneme '9 nt with the proposed zoning. Commiss Pel 1 i sh moved the Planning Commission recommend to thCity' . Council approval of the resolution e R -30 on rezone ng the site from LBC to Commissioner E1lefson seconded • Barrett El lef Ayes Commissionersloners Axdahl ,son, Fischer, Pel 1 ish, Prew, Si mundi k Whitcomb9 ctomb r MEMORANDUM G, Action by Council: TO: City Manager Endo >= FROM: Director of Community Development Recd r e'<<,. SUBJECT: Rezonings (M -2 to F, R -2 and R -3) _ P C' - ........ LOCATION: Century Avenue, from Ivy Avenue to the tracks Datu.........:..r,.,APPT -I CANT: City of Maplewood OWNERS: City of Maplewood, Gladys Block, Dick Pearson and Gerta Vanderhoff and the Chicago and Northwestern Railroad DATE: March 31, 1983 REQUEST Council moved to reconsider rezoning the city property from M -2, heavy manu- facturing to F, farm residence and initiated a rezoning for the remainder of the si from M -2 to R -2, residence district (double dwellings) CONCLUSION Comments The Planning Commission and staff had previously recommended a rezoning to F and R -3, multiple dwellings. The city council did not approve this rezoning on March 14-- getting only three votes in favor. Four votes are required. This leaves the zoning inconsistent with the plan. There were three problems brought up by the opposing councilmembers: 1. Too many multiple dwellings and too high of a density in this area. 2. Mrs. Vanderhoff would have to rebuild by September 1. 3. Possible location for the steam generation plan. The density in this area is controlled by the Land Use Plan, not zoning. The zoni only determines the type of b u i l d i n g . The proposed density is medium dens i ty. If council wou prefer to limit development to double and single dwellings, an R -2 (double - dwelling) zone would be best. This would also allow Mrs. Vanderhoff to rebuild in the future. The M -2 zone allows all types of uses- - everything from quads to used-car to industrial uses. Leaving the zoning as M -2 does not prohibit multipl dwellings. The city property was proposed as one possible site. for the steam generation pl amt. As you can see from the enclosed site review summary (attachments s i x ant the dump s was rated as being poor and was given a low priority. If phis site is chosen in the future, it would be better to issue speci use pertni t than allow a M -2 zone to - remain that may attract nuisance .es.. An R -2 or R -3 zone would be - consistent with the Land Use Plan an C. would el iminate the development of potential nuisance uses that could develop un &r M -2 zoning, These zonings would not affect the Pearson mobile home park, since this was approved with a conditional use permit. Mrs Vanderhoff has stated that she would like to rebuild a house on her property. r. The previous house was required to be removed because of fire damage. This could be done under the M -2 or R -2 zone. The R -3 zone, however, requires council approval to construct a single or double dwelling. No approval would be re- quired if construction is started within one year of removal Se tember 1 198P 3 }. Recommendation -= App:rova 1 of the enclosed resolutions, rezoning the city F farm res7i dente), the Vanderhoff property to R -2 (double and single dwelling) and the- Pearson property to R -3 (multiple dwelling ) . Ilk T 2 BACKGROUND Site Descriptions (See attachment three.) Maplewood site: A seventeen acre, undeveloped parcel. This site was previ ou - §ly a public dump. Part of this site is now used as a nature preserve caled "Jim's Prairie. The Park and .Recreation Commission recommended that this prairie be included on the Minnesota Natural Heritage Register. Vanderhoff site: A thirteen acre, undeveloped parcel with several sheds from a previous house. This house was removed because of fire damage. Pearson -Block site: A 39 -acre parcel that is undeveloped, except for a single dwelling. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Railroad tracks Easterly: Century Avenue and single dwellings in Oakdale. Southerly: Undeveloped, except for quads on Ferndale Street. The city approved a PUD for this property allowing the development of single dwellings, and quads or town houses. Westerly: Undeveloped. The city approved the construction of town houses, a park and golf course as part of the Maple Greens PUD. Past Actions 5- 18 -72: Council indefinitely tabled a special use permit request for a solid waste transfer station on the Vanderhoff site. 9 -5 -74: Council granted a special use permit for a solid waste transfer station after being ordered to do so by a court. 10- 25 -82: Council approved a special use permit for a 245 lot mobile home park on the Pearson -Block site. 3- 14 -83:Council did not approve a rezoning to F and R -3. 3-- 28 -83: Council moved to reconsider the F rezoning and initiated a rezoning to R- 2, T DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS - Tom. Planning T 1. Land Use Plan designations: RM, residential medium density and OS, open space. (See attachment four. 3 2. The RM classification is designated for such housing types as single dwellings on small lots, double dwellings, town houses and mobile homes. The maximum population density is 22 people /net acre. The number of units for each acre would vary by dwelling type and bedroom mix. As an example, a two and three bedroom town house project with private roads would be allowed a maximum density of six units for each acre. A similar apartment project would be allowed 7.5 units for each acre._ 3. = 18 -2 of *the Land Use Plan states that "Zoning maps should be updated 4 as necessary to make both land use maps and zoning maps compatible." 4. Section 36 -485 of City Code states that "In any instance where the ci ty council or the planning commission is required to consider an exception or change in this chapter, including the zoning map, in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, the council or planning commission shall, among other things; a) Assure itself that the proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of this chapter. b) Determine that the proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included - in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. c) Determine that the proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare." 5. Zoning: M-2, heavy manufacturing. 6. The M -2 zone allows any. type of use, except for specified nuisance uses which require a condi ti.onal use permit. (See attachment five.) 7. The F zone allows agricultural and single dwelling uses. 8. The R -2 zone allows double dwellings and single dwellings with a minimum lot area of 7,500 square feet. 9. The R -3 zone allows town houses and apartments at the maximum density allowed by the Comprehensive Plan. Single dwellings are allowed with council approval. 10. Section 36 -17 (c) states that "A nonconforming building wholly or partially destroyed by fire, explosion, flood or other phenomenon, or legally condemned, may be reconstructed and used for the same nonconforming use; provided that, building reconstruction shall be commenced within one year from the date the building was destroyed or condemned and shall be carried on without interruption. " t ADMI NISTRATIVE Procedure 1. Planning Commission recommendation 2. City Council holds a public-hearing and makes a decision. At =least four votes are required for approval.. Jc Enc osures 1. Resolution 2. Location Map. 3. Property Line Map 46 Land Use Plan 5. M -2 District 6. Site Review Summary 7. Site Locations 5 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a re ul ar m •g meeting of the City CounciloftheCityofMaplewood, M was duly called and held in the Coun P Chambers of said City on the day of , 1983 at 7:00 .m The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Counci initiated the following rezon i n 9 s : 1. M -2, heavy manufacturing to F, farm residence for unplattedatted 1 ands beginingontheNorthSouth1/4 l i n e of Section 24 -29 -22 450 feet South thereon from the Southerly l i n e of the Omaha Railway right-of-way. thence North- easterly to the Northeast corner of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 thence Northeasterly to a point 75 feet Southeasterly. at a radius from the center line of the main track said railway thence Southwesterlparallelwithand75feetSoutheasterlyataradiusfromsaidtrackcenter l i n e to said North South 1/4 l i n e thence South thereon to the beginninginSection24- 29 -22, 2. M -2 to R -2, double and single dwellings for unplatted land, subject to Century Avenue. Part of the Northeast 1/4, Southeasterly of C. St. P. M. and 0. railroad right -of -way in Section 24- 29 -22, more commonlydescribedas1487CenturyAvenueNorth, 3. M -2 to R -3, mi 1 ti pl e dwellings for unplatted land, subject to CenturyAvenue. The Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 24- 29 -22, more commonly described as 1375 Century Avenue North. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. The rezoning was initiated by the Maplewood City Council pursuantPY p t to chapter 36, article VII of the Mapl ewood "Code of Ordinances; 2. Thi rezoning was referred to and reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Com mission on -Apri 1 4,1983, at which time said Planning Commission recom- mended to the City Council that said rezoning be 3. The Maplewood City Counci hel a public hearing on 1983 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were 9 iven an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and plannin commission. _ T r NOW, 'THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL -t he above-hit t t described rezoning be on the basis of the following fi ncngs of fact: T. 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance and Land Use Plan. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood,and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare Adopted this day of 21983. Seconded by Ayes- - STATE OF MINNESOTA } COUNTY OF RAMSEY } SS. CITY OF MAPL EWOOD } I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully comparedtheattachedand. foregoi ng extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the CityofMaplewood, held on the day of , 1983, with the original on f i l e in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom in- sofar as the same relates to this rezoning. Witness my. hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of 19830 City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota z. r i r i ATTACHMENT TWO NORTH ST. PAUL b8 1 HOLLOW A AV LEY AVE. ARP It N7E V R V 12Q 1. u Imier G t PE {Pr;vot e 212 MARYLAND E RGS: AVE ST 69 pvf o GER 6 Be0vei Ma WOL A AVE. O Locks 0 A = 69 : o ' KAR T LOCATION MAP sw I Mob .0 s E. IDAH AvE. v - -- - - - - -_ ..------- - - - -.. ar •' s - • `` ' A i T — - --— - =- -t- — - - --• —{-•' 'mss K.tir ' —•# w r -0 ' """ R "+.••..._ • • • IL a an 79 If E Qr- T L=Ll ssilLL.tiilfs G ii NSP PROPANE Rl ' - - PLANT M2 ....... 4 8 7:- 2 (R 2) L OWNER • _ Rl_2(F 1 • = •• •: •- ' =ti GERTA VANDERHOF Q v =Q V 0-001 • y .A iL •. - _ ....... 2. (• OWNERS .:::::::. ...... ........:. ............ GLADYS BL0CKL 5137DICKPEARSON tipti . I S l'lJ: :Yl : ':YSML•.J i ................... . I I ............... A f M 0001, M 2 -.•- Q _ .... R 3... MAPLE GR EE VY AYE .. :•:.=L= PUB) • y . ,' . -' _ ••fie sssssatae ado 13M, tip x ir r .. _ • Mitt if.: sroq Jr. * 2 = O"2 10 •r0 • a. ..aw . sit - PROPERV LINE MAP EXISTING ZONING M2 CC ATTACHMENT THREE PROPOSED ZONING (F),(R-2) and (R-3) 2 OI zI I! Q N T it L:- con] f - R ` Sc Beaver take NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN ATTACHMENT FOUR No 4 ATTACHMENT FIVE y . m DIVISION 10. M -2 HEAVY MANUFACTURING DISTRfcT Sec. 36 -201. Use regulations.i A building may be erected or use .d and a lot may be used or .occupied for any lawful use, except that the following ses shg all onlybeallowedbyspecialusepermit, after a finding e cif igytheycouncilthatsuchusewillnot ,be noxious or bazardous to surroundin gproperties: a) Dwelling, except for living quarters forg4 watchmen or care- takers and their families, Ps an accessory use to a business orindustrialuse; b) Abattoir or stock yard; c) Distillation of bones and wood; d) Incinerator or reduction of arba e •g g ,offal and dead animals; t e) Junkyard, y , salvage or wrecking yard, or the baling of rags orjunk, except when enclosed within a buildin f} Manufacture of: . 1) Asphalt or asphalt products; 2) Explosives, fireworks, including storage thereof;3) Fertilizer, when manufactured from organic materials;4) Gypsum, cement, plaster or plaster of axis•P ,5) Rubber or gutta perch$; 6) Sulphurous sul h uri c nitric, cSulphurousP • , • ,picric, hydrochloric or other offensive or corrosive acids. - g) Wood pulp and fiber, reduction and rocessinP g thereof. (Code1965 § 910.010) 2253 s s T PRELIMINARY SITE REVIEW SUMMARY Prox tin i ty . to,:Screened Site Steam Line Truck From Residential MaJor 3M Campus Power Plant S i t e Location Su n »i a ry Statement Lou tin Accesscess Areas ili hw9___ s mile C Gou Degree of Acc ep to b i 11 t A) .Fish Hatchery Poor Good Yes Excellent 3.2 St. Paul Ramsey Good 8)Outdoor Theater Excellent Good No Good 0985 Maplewood namSey Excelletit C)Workhouse Good Good No Good 294 Maplewood Ramsey Good D)Ford Dealer Poor Poor No Fair 2.8 lake Elmo Washington Poor E)Maplewood Dump Fair Poor No Poor 2.9 Maplewood Ramsey Poor F)Open land Fair Po0o Yes Poor 2.15 Oakdale Washington9 Poor G)K -Mart F a i r Excellent Yes Excellent 268 Oakdale Washington9 GuuJ 11)Woocida 1 e West F a i r Poor No F a i r 2.0 Woodbury Washington F a i r 1)Wooddele East Poor Fair No Fair 2.4 Woodbury 1 0 Washinyton Poor J)Battl Creek Good Good No Good 1.5 Maplewood Ramsey Good K)Minnehahe I' k `, , ,, Excellent Good No Good 0.6 Maplewood i - - y,Exce l l en t --4 R U 3 M z 4 t L TTA HM NT SEVEN0or ==7 L.— S I Ift a W . lb • 01' . . 4WD fa tooft 9.0. • .i,, Al 22--JJ L • Zft. ', rl imJ%7) tz db 4; AO L ddUCNA XAadt: E0. 0 ClTOO- PA• wff --ft/la 41 4K; ur t d0p Ojai W 10V * for",%Z-4 2 up AL 00 %4L a tea _ — I a —4 - -- a 1 ^9 VI 4p w 40 P AM F -• t • •-- i --- • . - _.,•,_ _.. . eft ! t + I • . r , • ..i . i • S am v qp Alm 4LT—v -- a 6. m %v \ - - , --- ,Co-, . ; 1!T r-m o %.w r 7-0 Ki 1 f GIr--wd % -&- A*is — J: .. . : . . 1 . vALV s %,. e % • .. ILI 76 # raw W.."on Im . db -%P ban 40 300 s 9JL% Iz A3k0 2-'-'Able Am -N : bz 1416%.01 qb• Lq do r - P f In_ so % w I 1 0 — Noe LAPtoJiVC A 10 b I L H ca0v -NMI p410SpILa ile istur ;VOL fte 40 44UP d: 00 r wka* p m VW lkift* OD Z6 dk4 16. P : MAPLEWOOD 3,c lb 0 IL ft.0- K. LZ 48 •1 •••.••... LZ1 46 d1b cl,r dw 4 L ENERGY MARK POTENTIAL. FACILITY LOCATION nos. 0.0- • -W QW. "ft -w0b aO -000m. l mom a, P46 s E. Rezoning: Century Avenue (Ivy Avenue to the tracks) Secretary Olson said the Council moved to reconsider the rezoning of the city property from M -2 to F and initiated a rezoning for the remainder of the site from M -2 to R -2. Commissioner Fischer mo th Plan Co recommendo_ the_. ty__Counci l_ approval_ o_f the resol u ons . rezoni n_g_the City _ro„Per to Fes _ the Vande roerty_t R -2 and the Pearson proper to R -3P — - — Commissioner Pel l ish seconded Ayes- -Commi ssioner Axdahl Barrett, Ei 1 efson, Fischer, Pel l i sh, Prew, Si gmundi k, Whitcomb. z.; 0. MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner . ns in ° °ncijSUBJECT. Ordinance Amendment--Signs Residentialent al Zones APPLICANT: City of Maplewood _Endo_;_DATE: March 30, 1983 _ _ Rej ec . SUMMARY a .......... R_ equest Amendment of the sign ordinance to permit signage for institutions in resi- dential areas. Reason for Change The current sign ordinance does not allow signs for churches, schools or other institutions. The result is a large number of variance requests. Objective To create reasonable sign criteria for facilities commonly located in resi- dential districts, thereby eliminating the need for so man y variances. Comments Institutional buildings, like any commercial business, should be permittedidentificationsignage. The present ordinance does not address signs for these facilities, presumably due to an oversight. Staff feels that for institutions, 32 square feet would suffice for most signage needs. This size sign would also be comparable to the averag9 maximum size sign permitted by those communities surveyed. Section 36 -318 has been deleted from the proposed ordinance: the maximum permitted number of signs is already addressed in the amendment. i REFERENCE INFORMATION Existing Code Refer to the enclosed amendment. Past Actions Tounci l has approved sign variances for the fol l.owi ng facilities: i. 2- 20 -79: Gladstone Community Education Center to erect a 26.4 square - foot ground sign. b. 8 -6 -81: Health Resources, Inc. to erect a 40 square -foot ground sign. c. 10- 25 -82: Sun - Ray Montessori School to erect a 32 square -foot ground sign- d. 12- 13 -82: Trinity Baptist Church to erect a 28 square -foot ground sign. Council also directed staff to prepare a amendment to allow signs for churches and schools. Su rv Refer to the enclosed survey of surrounding communities closest to Maplewood in population and of adjacent communities. Of the communities surveyed which have specific size requirements, the average maximum size sign for a church or school is 30 square feet. Procedure 1. Recommendation by the Community Design Review Board 2. Public hearing by the City Council 3. Second reading by the City Council tat least four votes required for approva iW Enclosures: Proposed Ordinance Survey a ' 2 I ORDINANCE N0. v AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 36 OF THE MAPLEWOOD CODE RELATING TO SIGNS IN R -1, R -2 AND R -3 DISTRICTS The Maplewood City Council hereby ordains as follows (addi are underlined and deletions are crossed out): Section 1. Sections 36 -316 to 36 -318 of the Maplewood Codes are isP I*reby amended to read as follows: Section 36 -316. Permitted. The only signs which are permitted in an R -1 Residence District Single Dwelling), R -2 Residence District (Double Dwelling) or R -3 Residence District (Multiple Dwelling) in the city are as follows: 1) Signs permitted in Schedule I, subdivision I of this division, as regulated therein. Z) One fascia sign of not more than two (2) square feet in area giving the name and occupation of the occupant of a building carrying on a home occupation as defined in the city zoning ordinance. 3) One business er 4deRtff4eat4ep fascia or freestanding identification sign of not more than eight (8) square feet in area for each street frontage €reRt4ng ep eaeb street wb4eb beapds a let in for an apart- ment d4str4st or townhouse complex 4) One fascia or freestanding identification sign for each street frontage of not more than e4ght -84 thirty -two (32) square feet in area for an a apartfeet building church, school, library, community center derR}tery ue4t fratere4ty or serer4ty heuse similar use in a residential district. (Ord. No. 427, - 818.170 Schedule II (1)), 7- 14 -77) Section 2. Section 36 -318 of the Maplewood Code is hereby deleted. Seet4eR -36 -3187 Max4mum- eafber- ef- s4ges, 1 - Ease sha the be- ef- sgs peg b }1d }ng- eEeed -nee -gip -ae R- 1- Res* deRee- P4str4et- kS4Rgle- 9well4Rg) -R -2 -Res } deRee- 94str4et 8ebe- 8webg- e- R- 3-- ResdeEe- 9set- P4epe -9we }egg -e the E }ty:-- 8d: -ae -- 427 - 818 -178- SEhede- 113- 7- 14 -77 Secs. 36 -319 318 - 36.328. Reserved. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect after its passa a and publication. r Passed by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota this day of , 19830 ATTEST Mayor Ayes- - Nays-- __ c C er SIGNS -RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Survey of Metropolitan Communities Closest to Maplewood in Population Institutional Signs M u n i c i p a l i t y Churches, Schools ) r . Maplewood Code does not address. Coon Rapids 32 sq. ft. wall or 9 round r sign per frontage Roseville 50 square feet Burnsville No guidelines Plymouth 32 sq. ft. wall or ground sign - -one sign only Brooklyn Center One 36 sq. ft. ground sign plus one 32 sq. ft, wall sign per frontage Fridley One 24 sq. ft. sign Blaine One 36 sq. ft. wall or ground sign per frontage New Hope One 20 sq. ft. sign per frontage Golden Valley One 35 sq. ft. sign White Bear Lake One 32 sq. ft. sign Apple Valley One ground and one wall sign at 40 sq. ft. each S. St. Paul Conditional use permit required for structure and signs Eagan One sign at 16 sq. ft. Maple Grove one sign - -18 sq. ft. Columbia Heights Two signs permitted at i 32 sq. ft. Cottage Grove No limit to the numb " f signs, but together t; may not exceed 100 sq. ftvt Shoreview One 24 sq. ft. ground sign per frontage Q, t Institutional Signs Municipality,Churches, Schools) Crystal 4 sq. ft. ground sign -- code does not address wall signs ADJACENT COMMUNITIES Little Canada 24 sq. ft. St. Paul One ground sign 30 sq. ft. N. St. Paul One sign at 24 sq. ft. Oakdale One sign per frontage at 24 sq. ft. Woodbury One sign at 24 sq. ft. Newport .3 sq. ft. wall or ground t 5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Sign Code--(R-1 zone) The Board reviewed with staff the revisions made to the proposed ordinance. They discussed what size signs would be permitted. Board Member Fol ley moved the Board recommend to the Ci tf Counci l T a proposed revision to the sign ordinance as reviewed and amended by the Board. - s y 7. _. VI S I TOR PRESENTATIONS 8. BOARD PRESENTATIONS 9. STAFF PRESENTATIONS 10. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 9:55 p.m. l d MEMORANDUM i Action bar Council: T0: City Manager FROM: Associate Planner--Johnson Endorsed SUBJECT: Rezoning Modi. o LOCATION: Maryland Avenue and McKnight Road -= Re ec 1—ed—rAPPLICANT: Council = ` DOWNERS: Beaver Lake Estates, Perry Shortri d 9 e, Ton oswal -d, e tteY Gerald Bruzek, Evelyn Sal kowi cz, John Johnson, Carl 01 sen and Paul Edmiston (See Attachment Three for Parcel Ownership) DATE: May-2. 1983 SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL Request Rezone about 68 acres at the corner of McKnight Road and Maryland Avenue from M -2, Heavy Manufacturing to a zone compatible with the land use plan designation of RM, residential medium density. Proposal 1. This rezoning is part of the city -wide "downzoni ng" program. (Down zoning occurs when the zoning ordinance is amended to change a zoning district from a higher to a lower intensity use: in this case, from heavy manufacturing to residential use.) 2. There are no development proposals for these properties. CONCLUSION Comments The city council on March 28, did not approve a rezoning from M-2, heavy manufacturing to R -2, double dwellings and R -3, multiple dwell Three counci 1 members were in favor, with one opposed. The reason for the opposi vote was a concern that there are too many dwellings . in this area, Leaving the M -2 zone, leaves several problems unresolved: 1. The zoning is not consistent with the land use plan. 2. The M -2 zone allows all types of uses, includin multiples, commercial and industrial. 3. The residents were in favor of the rezoning, w character to the area. As a resui t of these problems, on April 11 council previous action on May 9. The three alternatives for the land west of future below in order of preference by staff and shown on anting to maintain a residential moved to reFl,ns i der their MW McKnight Road are listed the enclosed maps: 1. Councilmember Anderson's proposal: R -3 and R -2. 20' Councilmember Juker's proposal: R -2 3. Planning Commission's proposal: R -1 Recommendation (Requires at least four votes for approval)p ) CApprovalof ouncilmember Anderson's proposal, rezo p p ng the s . _ to R-3 and R -2. z - s 2 BACKGROUND Site Description Acreage: Approximately 68 Existing Land Use: Beaver Lake Estates Mobile Home Park, six sfn l e dw e l l i n g sonedwellingincludesapolabuilding) , an-. undeveloped land i Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Bulk Storage facility and undeveloped land, planned and zoned for industrial use East: Undeveloped land, planned for residential medium density. A planned uni development for Maple Greens has been approved for their site. South: Maryland Avenue and six single-dwelling lots. Across Maryland Avenue, county open space and the proposed Beaver Lake Hills planned unit development West: McKnight Road. Across McKnight Road are single dwellings in St. Paul Past Actions 6 -6 -68: Council approved a special use permit for the Beaver Lake Estates Mobile Home Park, 9- 13 -73: Council denied a zone change from M -2, Heavy Manufacturing to R -1, Single Dwelling for 2325 East Maryland Avenue and referred the question of rezoning a larger area to the Planning Commission. 1 -9 -75: Council gave first reading to a rezoning from M -2, Heavy Manufacturingy9 to R -1, Single Dwelling for the six lots north of Maryland Avenue (map two) . Due to citizen opposition, Council declined a 12 -2 -74 Planning Commission recommen- dation to initiate "public hearings for the rezoning of the complete area between Maryland, McKnight, the mobile home park, and the Bulk Service, Inc. property and that such hearing should consider the reasons for bringing the zoning for the area into alignment of the use proposed under the Comprehensive Plan (Residential Medi Density) for the City of Maplewood." 1- 16 -75: Second reading of the six- zone change request was defeated for lack of four votes in favor. 4 =20 -78: Counci approved a zone change from M -2 to R -1 for the six - lot area shown on map two in response to a lawsuit brought against the city.s F 8Z;6 -82: -An administrative - l of division was approved for Mr. Per Shortri d ey. 9 to create the triangular parcel to the southwest of the mobile lhore park, lying east of the McKnight realignment. The applicant indicated a desk re for commer- cial use of this property. 3 - DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS Planning 1. Land Use Plan designation: RM, Residential Medium Density and LSC, Limited Service Commercial (proposed in a separate report) Zoning: M -2, Heavy Manufacturing s 30' Policies Criteria from Plan, page 18-2: "Zoning maps should be updated as necessary to make both land use maps and zoning maps compatible." 4. Compliance with Land Use Laws: Section 36 -485 states that "In any instance where the city council or the planning commission is required to consider an exception or change in this chapter, including the zoning map, in accordance with the provi of thi chapter, the council or planning commission shall, among other things: 0) Assure itself that the proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of this chapter. 2) Determine that the proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring p roperty or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3) Determine that the proposed change w i l l serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare." Citizen Comments The three persons with single dwellings fronting on Maryland Avenue that are recommended for rezoning to R -2 were notified. The owners of 2335 and 2345 responded. 2345 had no objection to the proaosal. 2335 thought R -2 to the north of his property would be more compatible with the existing dwellings. Procedure 1. Planning Commission recommendation 2. City Council decision, following a public hearing mb Enclosures 1. Counci lmember Anderson's Proposal 20 Counci lmember Juker' s Proposal Planning Commi ss i on' s Proposal 4. Beaver Lake Neighborhood Land Use Plan E Existing Zoning /Affected Property Owners 4 1 3 Ni _.rr -.. Y .... a , _' r _ - - - _ . _ . art ! a ' .•7_R -"r ?."`i jry =.... a - rf 1 -_ w !• _ 7 r -- - ' .r = t _ . _ ...4 .:te ' 1 .. _ . y.- _ I • '. `• ' n a l: . r. :. t ._ . +- • _ i - _ w - M - -. r ^ .. - `,. L - i A .. = c i _ _ .1r - _ - - K i h t Road. - _ ' • - " - _ - _. =-= .- -• = = :. _ _ . . - _ - .: : - _ - -_ _ - _ - Pw • ` - +•-_ - ' - -. j_ s !__ - - ~- mot.- ._..._ _` a ... Realignment 14 1 w'. * s wzr.GGi: fiQ w ;•tip iv •.• a s _ a•e ATTACHMENT 1 PROPOSED ZONING (Councilmember Anderson) 4-b 6.r Y .. i •: _- - - _ - .- - ". r . t -.I • `•- - a .•/" "'. i A . „fir. - j _ . .i --': •'^ ,,,•.r mo0-0-ir 0. 00- 00 Mc ni 9 Roa Ir Realignment 000, 0000 Wool 0000 1001 0001p 001 jo .......... R-3 Y. B EAVER LAKE ESTATE MOBILE HOME PAR vr. I, nR-2 ATTACHMENT 2 PROPOSED ZONING (Councilmember Juker) Ar Ft apo da ZIA Cmc6iRoad Reali 000 0000. Wool 00*1 wo- NowVF R-3 VER LAKE ESTATE MOBILE HOME PARK x : xXXR-1 Ir- I ` r • `" ` • ............ c.:.: ----------- 4r . Z I W c 2 , .9 • ATTACHMENT 3 PROPOSED ZONING (Plannin Commission 0 Jel 4L i - t ' `' ` - UL j RI ]-a. sC cc sc Rm cz sC If Beaver Lake _ . I -ma le wood NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN 19-21 Revised: 2-3-83 x-15 -83ilerchanm Z*i If Beaver Lake _ . I -ma le wood NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN 19-21 WA;L M 2 r • iii• i ' E j iS 9ro + • R1 R3 R1 -- . 11 . . .. . . . .. . .. . a Y i si-M is s s w a d law" 1I • . , .- Pro csed Kealignment of r 0-0 McKnight Road' o , 10 2 v PUB) IN, M-27-I, Zi V C 41ird !li. atir dr, t Ac. y • t WIN 1K M..._ AFFECTED PROPER Y OWNERS 1) Beaver Lake Estates (6) Carl Olsen (2325 Maryland Ave.) Mobi Home Park 1) Russel N4ezgocki 2) Tony Oswald 8) Evelyn Salkowicz (1240 McKni 3) Perry Shortridge 9) Gerald Bruzek {1250 McNight 4) Paul Edmiston (2345 Maryland Ave.) 10) Vernon Potter (1262 McKnigh 5) John Johnson (2335 Maryland Ave.) B. Zone Change - -McKni ght Road and Maryland Avenue. 6 - - 2 - S,5 . Secretary Olson said the proposal is - to rezone about 68 acres from M -2, Heavy Manufacturing to R -3, Multiple Dwelling and R -2, Double Dwelling and NC, Neighborhood Commercial. Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment, Gerald Bruzi k, 1250 N. McKnight, asked where a roadway would go for the property in back of his home. Secretary Olson said it would depend on how the property would beSecyP developed. Mr. Bruzi k said he would l i k e the property to stay single -- family residential. Vern Potter, 1262 N. McKnight, asked if he would have to remove his existing storage building. Staff indicated the building would not have to be removed. It would be a nonconforming use which would mean the use could be continued, but not expanded or sold or any other type of manufacturing use. Mr. Potter said he is thinking of constructing another building. He wished the property to remain zoned light manufacturing. John Johnson, 2335 E. Maryland, said he did have the area rezoned to R -1 so he could construct a home on the property. He suggested the proposed alignment of g 9McKnightserving as a buffer zone and he would also agree with the R -2 zoning but not the R -3. The CommissionTe discussed the P ossi bi 1 i ty of having a zoning district less than R -3 on the west side of the McKnight Road Alignment and having the R -3 and NC zoning on the_ easterly side of the alignment. Staff indicated they were trying to maximize the development possibilities for the property the would get the maximum return on their p Y owners so Y property. The Commission also questioned if the Manufacturing zoned property could just be changed to a residential district without designating single or multiple. The also discussed what effect a higher residential zone wouldY have on property taxes. Commissioner Prew moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the area -under : consideration tie rezoned as fol-1 ows : 1. Area 1, which would refer to all properties east of the proposed new alignmentnment of McKnight Road, except for what is now called area 2,woul d be rezoned to R -3 Multiple Dwelling* 2. Area 2 which would consi of the piece of property at4he intersection between the mobile home park and proposed McKnight alilpipent as shown on the staff memorandum, would be NC, Neighborhood Commerce al . which would be all remainin3. Area 3, 9 parts , which would be all parts west of the proposed McKnight Road alignment would be rezoned as R -1, Residence District (Single Dwel l i ng) . Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes- - Commissioners Axdahl Barrett, El lefson, Fischer, Hejny, Pell ish, Prew, Whitcomb. MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of .Community Development SUBJECT: P.l anned Unit Development Rev _i s i on LOCATION: Maryland Avenue and Ferndale Street APPLICANT/OWNER: Castle Design and Development Co., Inc. PROJECT: Beaver Creek Condomi na tin Homes April 28, 1983 SUMMARY Re 7 Action by Colmncil: Endorse 11Modif i e d ,_______ Re u e ct 4 Date The applicant is requesting a revision to the 1973 planned unit developmentapprovaltorelocatethe110unitsapprovedforthenorthpartofthesite to the south part. Project Description 340 condominium units with 340 garage spaces and 340 open spaces. 2. Each unit would be sold separately. 3. Elevation and site plan are enclosed. 4. The open space to the north would be left undeveloped. 5. Each building is 2 -1/2 stories high in the front and three stories in the rear. 6. There are seventeen b u i l d i n g s with twenty units in each b u i l d i n g . 7. All interior streets, drives and open space would b owned and maintained by a homeowners' association. 8. There would be seven one - bedroom and thirteen two - bedroom units in each building. 9.-"A-swimming pool and tennis court are proposed, 100 kRefer to the - appl i cant's letter (attachment four)-= Reason for the Request =- 1. Condition eleven of the Maple Greens PUD requiresires that "Prior : to grantingQgngthefinaltenoccupancypermitsinthefirststage, the developer shall propose the succeeding stages.of development to the village council for review and determi nati °on of the avai and ad of deliver ofqyy neces support services." a 2 . - Condition one requires that "any changes in the adopted plan shall require a P ublic hearing and approval by the village council." rnmman t c Relocating the previously approved 110 units from the north part _of the site to the south has several advantages to the city: =- l MarY lake Road would not have to be constructed as a public improvement T project. ti The .2. ` norther y 91buildi site adjacent to " "Jim's Prairie" would remain open space and may be desirable to be acquired as a park. 3. It would be difficult to get sanitary sewer to the northerly portion of the site. The disadvant is that there ,will be more density and - traffic on Maryland Avenue than was approved in the 1973 PUD . The overall si - e density is still less than allowed under the city land use plan. The land use plan would allow 716 units. This proposal is for only 340 units. Recommendation Replace condi ti w one of the 1973 PUD with the following wording: 1 . The s i t e plan approved in 1973 shall be revised to move the 110 units approved along the northerl y boundary of the PUD to the north side of Maryland Avenue. The plan dated April 27, 1983 shall be the specific development P lan north of Maryland Avenue, subject to design review board approval. Any changes that result in an increase in density or change in b u i l d i n g type or site p q publicshallrequirea hearing and approval by the city council. Approval of the plan north of Maryland Avenue . i s subjec t to the following conditions: a. The two existing parcels shall be combined as one parcel. b. All common areas shall be maintained by the homeowners' association. The ci attorney must approve all rules and by-laws, Any changes affectingtYPP the common areas shall require city council approval. c. The City Council must 'orderrder a f e a s i b i l i ty study for the water mai on McKnightht Road and the elevated storage prior to construction of phases three and four of the proposal. d. The Cityt Council must order a public improvement for the pondi ng and stor water outlets Y stem to Beaver Lake prior to construction of phases three and four of the proposal. r e. Dedication of 33 feet of right -of -way for Maryland Avenue art of the property shall not affec_ he cityF. Grading on the north p p p Y property called "Jim's Prairie. "' 2 g, The developer shall make available to the City an area suitable for a neighborhood park as indicated in the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan. Location and size to be agreed upon by the developer and the Director of Community Services. If purchase is necessary, the City w i l l follow its procedures for establishing the value of the land. any costs of appraisal or other expenses shall be paid by the developer. i s mowwr _ 3 BACKGROUND Site Description Acreage of the site (north of Maryland Avenue): 69 acres Existing land use: undeveloped . Suffounding Land Uses T Northerly: city owned-land used as a nature area called "Jim's ;Prairie. " Easterly: quads along Ferndale Street and a proposed mobile home park to the north of the quads. Southerly: Maryland Avenue. Quads are being constructed south of Maryland Avenue Westerly: Beaver Lake Mobile Home Park Past Actions 7- 26 -73: Council approved a planned unit development, which included the applicant's site, subject to the following: 1. The attached site plan (see attachment three) indicating land uses, densities and street patterns shall be the village approved plan of development for the entire development, and any changes in the adopted plan shall require a publ i.c hearing and approval by the Village Council. 2. The development of the special use permit area shall be staged to allow development only of that portion designated RL and lying south of Maryland Avenue west of Ferndale Street and north of Magnolia Avenue, except as provided in condition No. 3, and such development shall only be allowed by official subdivision platting in accordance with v l l age platting .code . 3. Development of additional stages shall not be permitted until the vi l l age council is completely satisfied that all necessary support services are a v a i l a b l e or guaranteed to adequately service such additional staged areas within the special use permit property, while at the same time not over- loading or jeopardizing the service delivery capabili or performance to any existing surrounding developments or properties. 4. All structures proposed in the PUD special use permit shall be reviewed through the Community Design Review Board ordinance provisions to achieve an aesthetical and visually pleasant appearance and landscaped develop- ment, and the developer shall provide, at a minimum, in RL areas, an entire street throughout its length with structural and landscaping plans so that a comprehensive -design review can be performed by the v i l l a g e . L f 4 5. The proposed open space within the entire development and within each stage shall be clearly delineated and clarified in a legal document which outlines the development of the open space, its maintenance and citizen or resident rights to that open space, and such clarification shall be reviewed as part of the subdivision platting requirement and approved prior to any b u i l d i n g permit or ancillary development permit such as grading. 6. The developer shall1 an escrowed amount equal to the es mated cost Hof the Ferndale Avenue feasibility study; said amount shal besed to spay for said study if said project is not undertaken and assessed. (In Zother words, if the project does not go through, and there is not a project, add the cost of the f e a s i b i l i ty study onto the developer it will be paid out of an escrowed amount. If the project should go through, and it i to be assessed, then the escrowed amount will be returned to the developer. The developer would guarantee it from the beginning.) 7. No building or ancillary development permit shall be issued unless and until the improvement of Ferndale Avenue has been ordered by the village council and no occupancy permit shall be issued within the first stage until such street ii7,improve to village minimum street standards. 8. Any increased surface drainage resulting from the proposed development shall not discharge run -off anywhere from the site at any greater rate or volume than was the case resulting from its undeveloped state, and should such not be possible, the development shall be responsible to secure all necessary off- site legal rights for increased drainage discharge and /or storage and further bear all required related development costs to accommodate such run-off, and prior to any b u i l d i n g permits of any kind being issued a drainage plan shall be submitted and approved by the village engineer prior to any permit issuance. 9 . All u t i l i t i e s installed within the confines of the special use permit shall be installed underground. 10. The first stage shall commence physical construction within 12 months from the date of village council approval. 11. Prior to granting the final ten occupancy permits in the first stage, the developer shall propose the succeeding stages of development to the village council for review and determi nation of the availability and adequacy of delivery of necessary support services. 12. All residential dewel l i ng units shall be subject to the neighborhood park acqui and development charge policy of the village in effect at the time of the issuance of building permits 13. The developer shall provide financial assurance to the village guaranteeing his faithful performance of completing each stage approved and such assurance sbai 1 be the equi val ent of five percent of each completed construction aluation, and the developer shall provide evidence from a financial institution indicating that sufficient monies are assured to d€vel'op each stage approved by the vi l l age counci 1 and such financial assurlo.ces shal.1 be performed and submitted to the village prior to application - or the first bui l di ng permit of each stage. =- 5 14 The village reserves the right to impose additional conditions on each stage of development when such particulars are presented, 15. The applicant and owner shall agree to the above conditions in writing. Planning 1. Land use plan designation: RM, residential medium density anr4S, open space 20 -=:The RM classification is designated such housing types as ' ngl a dwelli Zon small lots , double dwell town houses and mobil homes. The maximum opul ati on density is 22--people/net acre. The number of units for each acre would vary by dwelling type and bedroom mix. As an example, a two and three bedroom town house project with private roads would be allowed a maximum density of six uni for each acre. A similar apartment project would be allowed 7.5 units for each acre. 3. Zoning: F, farm residence Environmental Except for three-knolls with relatively higher ground, most of this site is classified as a wet meadow wetland. The soil is usually without standing water, but is waterlogged within a few inches of the surface. Standing water i's apparent in the spring. Public Works Water The water distribution system in this service area is presently incomplete The supply and pressure required for fire fighting purposes is not adequate. The city, however, has approved several other developments in this area, including Pearson's mobile home park, Sam Cave's quads and the quads and dwellings south of Maryland Avenue. The third and fourth phases should be conditioned on the city council ordering a feasibility study for the McKnight Road water main. Domesti water supply also has some limitations i n pressure for higher elevations in thi area The Beaver Creek project is at a lower elevation and should be adequate. The water pressure problems in this area were considered in 1981, but water improvements were postponed believing that McKnight Road would be constructed in a timely manner.. There is a substantial cost savings to be real if the watar. improvements are constructed in conjunction with McKnight Road. However, no firm schedule is availabl for McKnight Road. The water system ni.mprovements must be considered immediately for this area, regardless - of any additional development. A feasibility study should be prepared investigating the 16 -inch water -main along McKnight Road and the elevated storage required for this area. =- i Sanitary Sewer Sanitary sewer is available and presently is adequate for the proposed development. It should be noted, however, that at ultimate development of the service district there will be a capacity limitation. Staff is monitoring this condition and will bring it to the council's attention when the flow nears capacity, The sanitary-sewer also has some bearing on the site layoutout f" the proposedgyPP development. Due to the elevation of the sanitary sewer it WbO d be di ff i cul t to serve the northern portion of the subject property. This to some extent explains the concentration of units proposed on the southern end of the parcel. Storm Drainage This site is part of a larger drainage area that extends from the railroad on the north to the outlet into Beaver Lake. Some of the storm drainage system is in place but the main trunk and pond i ng system remains to be constructed. The developer agrees to work with the city staff in develop- ing pondi ng areas that benefit the entire drainage area. Before completion of the proposed development, the pond i ng and outlet system should be constructed, however, limited development can take place wi th no addition to the present drainage system. Parks The city's bicycle routes/trails map shows a proposed trail running north and south through the center of this site. The director of community services states that "at this time it appears to me that the trail should not be a limiting factor in the development of this planned unit development. The construction limi indicate that approximately one -third to one -half of the property will be used for condominium homes. As a park system we would be interested in investigating the p o s s i b i l i t y of acquiring stable property that could be used for a playground and also property that could be added to the preservation of Jim's Prairie. The,Park and Recreation Commission at its'April 18 meeting recommended that "the northern half of the PUD, as it appears on the proposal, would be left intact re- garding grading or any other land use that presently exists. The commi als wished to notify the Council "that the Park and Recreation Commi is concerned about the high concentration of people in this area of the city due to the develop -. menu of another trailer court, town houses and condominiums, and none of the developers are providing active recreational facilities for their tenants." Other Agencies The Environmental Quality Board (EQB) previously approved an environmental assess- ment,worksheet for the previous plan. The EQB staff is reviewing this proposal anc will inform us if further approvals are required for the new plan. 1 Procedure 1. Planning Commission recommendation to city council. 2. City council holds a public hearing and makes a decision. jc -_- enclaosures 1. location Map 2. Property Line Map 3. 1973 PUD 4. Letter 5. Bicycle Routes/Trails 6. Neighborhood Park Concept 7. Site Plans (2) 8. B u i l d i n g Elevations (Separate Document) 8 war 30 LARPENTIL IDAHO AVE. or cr- MCNTANA X. ui AV r- 32 w- [ 12 D T. TTH AVE. z E.?TH AVE. 70)ANA - _AVE. I %/ 3i) - - 1. -- F LOCATION MAP QFltOYe/ CL 0 A- e O 1 i • Yf 1 t f29.7 T FUTURE SITE OF { PEARSON ESTATES MOBILE HOME PARK r 1 ;.b 2 4 3 Z 5 6 8 7 woos l i. i' woos Wawa JOA Je"co D 'BEAVER =LAKE 0 _ ESTATES MOBILE _ - - - . __ lT 21 _ S - CAVES CENTURY - HOME PARK - -- ...:........_. Cn2 ADDITION QUADS W25 28 PROPOSED -BEAVER CREEK i X2 .•e CbNDOMINIUM SITE X32 ^" i 7 '' its . -- •r 6`. f ,• a - _ 59 , 40 3 3 ; . r 1 r/ N' I! N Ar r'1 Ar Y r_ i •: L a7r s3 sj/ •s.J sr*y sap —"j; — ------- : -- — -- —ss•i' ` •' •• y , OUTLOT A 4. 5 8 9 12, 1 Iii • Attachment two PROPERTY LI MAP R1. .26.5 acres •'' ... - -- ; ,,r --• - - r_ -- I - J i • - R1/1 52.5 ESTRIAN. j '' ; ;.; `_,^ ; % `1 •- `ti r f 29 •I sO / 7_3 V _If 4 \ 1 108.0 acres \ --i=• - ; . ,• - ; ; ti , • r 13.8 pacpt2l2cre (pla) j'''= a _,/ . ,. I 1p . \ ,, J / % I / s • . ` St I; 1 te :• ( 1 - \` \.`" , t ,,{ \ t 1 • i I 1 i `, ! • •a•• L, / f iI i ' .i- =•__ r• -' r - I 1 \ ` \ F pra , / I • - 1 i •, i fI. a .- V: - '.. 1i !., I • 1, 1 I ".: _ /iI ` rtej •N• , ` _` W tlls :• 1 i _ -` I 1 / - -i ^ r . {f• ; r,. • • i I -• 1 / 11 off / lj,1 1 ; ;111 I I ' l ` 1 7 ; 1N , . j • t 1 PQS'.3L a FUTURE NT !:`,1 - I`i ai ALIGMM-E'H, ti '• ; I 3 1 ' tl OF FERNOAt E'.: , oil S ` ji 1 I t 1 1 1 1 fi t 11 t / r . 1 1 I \ , • • 1 I / / 1 1 / • { tjf••••••. •..•... i. ••••t / / / f 1 / 14Qunits '1Qacres ; ' _21 8p/a f'f:f`I ; /' r 1, ; ; . / ;t +1/ : 1 awn*1 83 'unitslits / r1 • 1 -1 i : 22.0 p /a ! i 1 t ; 1 ; • i' i i i tJ1 HO lE PAAK _ t 1 ti/ • I ! rI f. t ! •_- 1 / yy / ..,,,,..,,11 •'• -`` • • f 1{ + i ' , 1 !_, -•x _ „ ' • / - At1..liOliS1••G.` I 1 • . t • v- - - Lido— o* e- j A p 12.5acres j'1 •' 1 • % I 1 /- -_- ~~ - • 1 Units `,• ;' 22.0 /a -..; .__- ;• ; •jIs ' •. p, _._ -" 43.5 acres ; ;i u- j .,0urnts 1:/ r .. - _ . • f i . _ % O :;fitpL- 4:0 /a i . f • • t • N• GER 1 t.• - ' / IT' r i +_/ t - - -; h to / • " . r m':.o_r •:. : =:. n: , . . +,_ , `t 1, / ,J /L +.'ate . ,- r , BE PLANNED CEVELCQ1htNTiCRFEmaT.:1•cccl 1z:,;r,;;,;a;a ELE•/LSCH. land ease /densit . t y j - Nd I -- 'r /•lalwa) b 1./iwN L •x•11 ! +v!.• •..a.w.w ft•,p•w•w •w••. b•e L r• Attachment three do li 1973 PUD Attachment four 4 r I n Design & Development Co. inc. 2419 No. Margaret St North St Paul. MN 55109 Phone 770 -6138 L AX a 1 r- April 11, 1983 Honorabl a Mayor . Honorable Council persons City of Maplewood Maplewood, Minnesota Castle Design & Development Co., Inc. has recently purchased the property located at Ferndale and Maryland which consists of 69 acres. In 1973 the City Council of Maplewood granted a Planned Unit Development for this property. This P.U.-D. consisted of 340 total units wja configuration of part of the units to be on the South and the remainder at the North end of the property. At that time it was anticipated that Nary Lake Road (Old Pump Road) would be continued on to service the property to the North. At that time also, very little consideration was given to the soil condition of this particular -piece of property. Sometime later the City of Maplewood initiated the construction of the continuance of Maryland Avenue - together with sewer and water. The assessment which resulted against this particular piece of property came to a total sum of $325,000.00 - which was extremely high. Since the council action of 1973 said "that in the event any changes were contem- plated in the configuration of streets, unit placement, or number of units, the applicant must go back before the council for approval. We are not contemplating asking for a change in number and as there was no street configurati at the time. We are now asking that there be .a change in the configuration of the placement of the unifs. - - i a Eeosiag Otr.rmmiq •....I To install Mary Lake Road at this time is totally unreasonable due to the fact it would only service one property and also as the council in approving Pearson's Trailer Court plans - the property now owned by Pearson would have qo use for that road. - Alle are subml tti n a plan which entailss movi n all the allowable units under the 19739P9 . P.U.D. , the South portio of-the property;. :thereby taking total advantage of the utfil ti es intact and making the cost of those - uti 1 i ti es more appl i cabl a to the project and dispersing their cost where they become more equitable. I hope our relationship in the past and Castle Design & Development Co's reputation with the city to do what. they say they will - will help you to come to a favorable decision on this new development. v S' r 7 - e rvais /vice Pres Ca sign & Dev. Co., Inc. kdgljmg i 4 r v i oc 0 M20 _A o0 Nt++T• _ Y r a 0O.4b ,.J.Alms up 10 1f tj i r fit j —- dlu 1 ft" to f'. :! •• • PAUL Savo %r ... rte.• .• T • 8 T Mo r k1t " Ouaw dnh end Ord • • j Is NqUW 46 O • . -j 1 I.RI. v •• ' A.00 CO3 r ! mat e•.•. ' 'i r .... s -- f L • .... , a ••.w • , PW Fla PAW Ir+ Jj f IN Tap T7 O o J. it FOAOL /T. /Mild ` 399 c)y u es j • • .3 Existing Bicycle Route (ony street) _. . Existing Bicyclea Routey (off street)r c (on 'Potential Bic y le Routes street ,...T 1 40tenti al Bicycle Routes (off street ) l 4 • County Proposed Bicycle Routes one 2 Proposed Regional Trail - •• 1 City Proposed off -Road Bicycle Routes : itos •.,,, , oom 4 Source: Minnesota Department of Natura Resourc Maplewood ''• --' o Transportation-Plan Barton - Aschman • and City of Maplewood . J.1 *.%A 0 0 D o __ ., , OPINION a Future ,. »•.» Futur!MP MP M n 4444 -s. ___. -. .• a•w . • , 4444• r y +{ . r ! -' I ! zltf . •, 4444 4444.. , y 1 !••r•• •!• 1 w•1 tx ••pi••r•• / . Jn•r w J• Az OD Newf I • • ws 1 •s..r.r • , . ,n,• 4444 KOHL AN 4444.. rl 3 LAKE Future 1 1 ••• Perk District and Boundary., 0 FOUR I! thtS rreo 13 for pWnnrg tA 44 44 •.- ,••lC,.. p0 , ourooses only ar,o shoub C7 - • . 5 77 n01 to used where prec9L > „•:r., r---- _ ftesslu Is reoulred = " _ - - ,4444... % •• - tr,l,. F; r 7FTON •44,44. r } i EIG HT 'f 'P Futur .• . + `r _s+tif• 1 rV- I • • • yy ,t C+ M '',,- t - ..,,7 , /'' ', N 4444.i_ l 10wJose 4444 ([' , t ,.• ' . .i ' . ; ., D . _enx•1'1 N•. C+ Ov , Lam- _ e N 1 : M. J •• L. y' .• •• I 11 Eu.si l dH ' i. ' r 14 I PRO nX. , ,. • love l: /••N• 4 ,•• I i •,. ' ` V "`°•C`...iii } , ; • , AD- - - f t . j w - '. ._ _S1 A !T• If Future 44 44 6•• . • M . 62 , r• 4444 .. ».I a_..442•.691% •.• HILLSGOAL1Park/ 3000. Residents and Parks . Within 1 /2 Mile of Residents Future , Existing Neighborhood Park and Service. ' Radius MP - e-0»- 1 ' Mini-Parks 4444_ _ '' t -,• 4444• t Proposed Neighborhood Park and Service Radius "" •. ' ~ i ` PLEASANT ! SE -r _ . 4444 Vim Future sites are search areas only •• Future r Prepared b r :~ P Y 1 h r, c r ` • ••i••;co to 100 ft" Ce M KE oSo- 88.2» October 1980 I t •. ` tow , wr • \ •:..,i .. _ \w• r •r •• •• •_r ' • 1, ..•.r u Li• lL •- « ' . ,. I ' , •w •ar a. «w.•a. •.w•a.rr_.Tr! -i- _. -. . •L - Jam. -.. -_ ' •_ . .. .- .w..•.r •M ITlow fogy Poo ow 111;1.`' II •, I••••.• 1 /, 1': • ' •fI ' 1 •' « BRA . j +, ' III• ' f •• •' •' k; °. nu T .... ••••• • ••'•• ,• , • ,1 `f • •• • 1• •• + • • , J , ' }s 1 .'. r I • r f' • ' 1 i •'• . , •... ,./ ••••`` ( • w• . . • • , . • ..1 ` ,'' 1t • * 1••I I •, • j 1 .• ' • 1 1 Tl: fir/ • r •• t60 1 1 As Ole 1 1 rte; ... 1 •• • C •••' •' i . . • •- : ••1 sag 0 do M11• ,• •• 0.0 ,. 1••• •••1 • ' . _ • •. ' I 4 • . mm to 1 r•, ,. • global •,• •' •. '• • I I" .. ' / • w• , • ' 1 1. 1 •too Go 0 6 • to Jr It Ob At 1 1 •• 1 ' • • i of to 04 ofAs j . • ' •• ' ! i • • • ••• •' I • !' • • ' is •' , , .. •` . I 1 ., • • ''- • ..wry • •' 1 • '••' •• • I ' ,. /•peg . • • , `A - 1 / ,I !• , •• ' ( i It i I ff 1 •'• I of 1 1 • •• ! ` .. J'/ `,,, • •fi. • ••, • ' • .1 ......•• . • i' i 1 •• .• •., • 1.. •i ..• ' Nj x•'11. a.••. r•1 IT +.••..' 121 : ' :. 'M" i ^ vow Irv" J •w . ... er 1• M i •• • i. .• - L • -. It 1 ' • 1 . ,••1.•;• ' ` 1 . , ,'•• ` /;,•' .•.T. • I +__ Ar111 /-, •f• •.IAI•....•. •.. •... r.•.•......•.••.... ! I too CouMT !S'1!ltPT14M lllTt ftA t. Lives LIMIT A UNIT 0 UNIT C UNI 0 UNIT i TOTALL UN's 1111 ha 1 UNIT$-I UNIT$-t UNIT•1 WAIT " AMID 460 PUT $ 0/ IK "101104I. Q 0 OIL •0 m AaNT OF WAY; AL$0 Tqt $ 04 Of The $t 114, A" N UCT1111• 1 A's 1 • A's I ILA'$I $ IN'$ 91 jOMH1.4• /•/AAI• At$IO911TIML 11 M ftam i UINf$-UNITS-1 UNIT •Jt /MII1 t • A'$i A'$w 1 Uw A't - I IS A'$ ISI1 1 .ft's 11" IU+Ni.- I Og: 11, 11 111.1 uu111- a b a's luwl• I A A'{ TUT P"T OF Tod mu P4 of ba of 04 TN• IrIT OF aml, AA94 to IMUMPTI N "Beam Li+ErQ OLTION LIMN - -....-4 LIAf Phalli tae Nt Ct IAON Of GAlo Mw M4 a tilt N w 6m ITINIET 140"1 a WAT 1 a. AcKs oyylip Led ...... ..•• ..... _....•fv 4 PON ON Tat of I" to $A10 nw w at TIIa k w acT AtlLA tT I.4"93 Haft I-wt ..__.. _......__.AMID 460 PUT $ 0/ IK "101104I. Q 0 OIL •0 m AaNT OF WAY; AL$0 Tqt $ 04 Of The $t 114, A" N UCT1111•GDWVW Gr46 PLAN •4- 1W46KA S 0111 ICTM1AJNU 4119"MN MD1'eATv Lod 481$14.A & • .....•• ••..... •. f 1N. f so a Ii, 44614 COuNTT ,•IAINKsmI GU MQt To 91 jOMH1.4• /•/AAI• At$IO911TIML t1uSt1•N a "mama •••.••••Nl•• ••••••••CIAAuhwAnt. 1 1t10P0.10 IIONtN4.11 -$ 0611 "014-9 911T1111'TMAId11UR YwtkN1111 1pUI•. Nill•OONIIMNI•• .INN•pI1pI IT amstme wagil"T "W" eJ41$tI1M •11111••AN •+•w•+• +• i t tar.r.• TOTN.O •uMIT!• #UNIT$- I Lquw• I Wwf$• 4utlT$ ,iM t0"L Laos P!A out& f >• tp [.N4t1M slow sonJI AI1411 • •A'44 •4'f W 1 rl' ;rAJ N•1'$ NMI • tOtAN• 1,1••NTt. N0 TOTAL want "Ally 940 • T07A1 0f^ A•AA1•If . 140 ' 18L% Oft STUI f = T 11 op" INA as a Its IIt61MAT 10.1111. NLIMIM L w..••.r.,a ,,,, • • ... a.aw..w. • •a•••r rlrrrrr•++w.w•+ • •• ••..,./ A••Nrft••IN4t'' wANIMOTOM i[OLMAI fAY1M1 • l N..AM • ' . •'k ' ( • r •1 LOAM A>t$OCiAT10M / lul' 1' or <TIL, III w BEAVER CREEK04%M/A/••.NO,' vtnt NS/AIN • 01rr4w•j•Ir N. A•nwrl.lw•r • "i to Iw•.rN •INKlT 41 1 ' 1rATt1 4f,A It M 44Nt • CONDOMINIUM HOM . ~ I 1 ; MEMORANDUM End . sf._,.,_._,_,..._.. TO: Manager Red ecte.. -- r. FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Request from Mr. Harry Otto ` DATE: May 2, 1983 Staff has investigated the work required to satisfy Mr. Otto' s request. The work involves building a catch basin, installing approximately 45 feet. of pipe, filling the boulevard and restoring the surface. The cost range is about $800.00 to $1000.00. As the Council may recall, Mr. Otto previo requested the City to address a drainage problem. Last summer the work was done and apparently does function, according to Mr. Otto. The filling and piping now requested would negate any positive effect created by last year's work. It should also be noted .that similar requests from property owners are not uncommon. If the Council wishes to address these types of problems on a regular basis, appropriate accounts should be established and funded through the budget process. MEMORANDUM u Council,- TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director s z RE: Budget Transfer for MicrocoMDuter Purchase DATE: May 2, 1983 PROPOSAL sir d et transfers totaling $4,640 be approveitisproposedthatbudget d for the q ppurchaseofamicrocomputer to replace the leased computer terminal in the Finance Departments ParvaRmimn per month for leased computer terminal in Currently the City is paying $ 104 p . This terminal was installedled 1 ast Fall when the City the Finance Department. that the terminal changed to an on -line data processing system, It is proposed 1 ett- Packard Model 125 microcomputer which would be be replaced with a Hewlett-Packard identical to the system in the Public Works Building. The advantages of this proposal are as follows: of a microcomputer would be cheaper in the long run Purchase than continuing to lease a terminal for data entry to the LOGIS system. The microcomputer could be used for fixed asset accounting records which are now maintained by Marshall & Stevens, Incorporated. . Thi s would save money and allow fixed asset reports to be or inted more often and with less turn- around time. enable the financeAmwoulde staff to use visicalc e software for the preparation of accounting worksheets and financial projections. The microcomputer would provide word processing capabilities. microcomputer in then Public Works Software purchased for the P could be used on the microcomputerBuddingcou r in the Finance Department as they would be identical mode l s . d for purchase has the capability for The microcomputer propose P uter and the mini-with the Ramsey County computer should the need arise Pcom uter in the Public Safety Department in the futures in effect which would allow the A sales promotion is currently City to purchasehase the microcomputer for $7010 less than what was paid when the Public Department made their .purchase. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. V 7. i+ is f1 TO: City Manager May 2. 1983 Page 2 The ' total cost of the mi crocomputer. and requ i red peri pheral s i s - $6,640. Earl i er this year the Council approved a 1982 Budget carry -aver of $2,020 to partially finance this purchase. It is proposed that the remaining monies needed for this purchase be financed by savings due to cancellation of the terminal lease 7 months @ $104) and the balance from the contingency account. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council authorize the above budget transfers totaling 4,640 to finance the purchase of a microcomputer. DFF:1nb 0-IT- z MEMORANDUM v i • . i 1 b it '. / i ...: _L 1 • y •..! ) "!vtaer .alas- fnevab+.a TO: City Manager FROM: Finance DiDitor ULRE. 1982 Annual Financial Reports and Audit R DATE: April 26, 1983 D a Recently the City's 1982 Annual Financial Reports and audit were completed. Three documents have been prepared this year: 1 General Purpose Financial Report - contains data extracted from the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and provides a concise summary of the City's financial condi Copies of this report will be distributed to the City's advisory boards, commissions and council. Al a limited supply w i l l be available to the public. 2) Comprehensive Annual Financial Report - contains detailed financial and statistical information to provide complete information on all financial transactions during the year. Copies of this report will be to the Council, State Auditor, Moody's Investors Service, Standard and Poors, bond investors and the Maplewood Library, 3) Management Report and Recommendations - contains the auditors comments on the City's financial condition and provides recom- mendations regarding financial management. Copies of this report will be distributed to the Council and Finance staff on approximately April 29th. It is recommended that the Council schedule a meeting with the auditors to discuss these reports. In the past; these meetings have been held i,n conjunction with the regular Council -Staff meeting on Thursdays. As an alternative, a special meeting could be held to allow more time for discu and review of the reports. DFF:Inb a MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Fi nance Di rector RE: Ordinance to Abolish Insurance Committee (1st Reading) DATE: May 2, 1983 Acti by i . E r. d o r s e.l.. V,_ .. _ Nod PROPOSAL It is proposed to have first reading of the attached ordinance to abolish the Insurance Committee to avoid Dotential violation of antitrust laws. UrKnpniIND The Insurance Committee was formed several years ago to eliminate the procedures wherein one aqent was regularly awarded the City's insurance coverages without competition. Annually, the Insurance Committee obtains quotations on the.City's insurance coverages (except for employee group insurance) and prepares a recom mendation to the City regarding placement of insurance. Present members of the Committee are Jerry Ekbl ad, B i l l Howard, Irving Anderson, Ed Maranda , John Winter and Dick Pearson. More details regarding the Committee are in the attached excerpts from the Maplewood Code (Exhibit A), In November, 1982, I was contacted by a representative of a professional risk management firm regarding the management of the City's insurance program. This representative suggested I check the legality of the City's Insurance Committee and mailed to me a copy of an agreement between the Attorney General and insur- ance agents for the City of Virginia, Minnesota. On November 4th, I mailed this agreement to the City Attorney and requested a written opinion on the legality of the City's Insurance Committee. In January, I received a publication on the application of antitrust laws to insurance purchases. This publication dealt extensively with alternative insur- ance Durchasinq procedures (including the us of insurance committees) and cited legal opinions regarding antitrust laws in relation to insurance purchasing. This publication was referred to the City Attorney and a copy is attached Exhibit B). On April 27th, the City Attorney issued a legal opinion "that the City should abandon i present ordinance and method of obtaining insurance and resort to a method which will not be in violation of the antitrust laws." A cony of this Opinion, is attached (Exhibit C) . On April 28th, the City Attorney and I attended a meeting of the Insurance Com- mittee. The Committee members were presented a copy of the City Attorney's legal opinion and a long discussion ensued. The following is a summary of the items discussed: TO: City Manager May 2, 1983 Page 2 1. A recommendation would be made to the City Council at its May 9th meeting to have first reading of an ordinance that would abolish the Insurance Committee. 2. Members of the Insurance Committee volunteered to assist the City in the preparation of specifications for proposals on insurance coverages that expire July 1, 19830 3 . The specifications w i l l be drafted in a manner to allow the greatest possible number of quotations. 4. The specifications w i l l be reviewed, typed and duplicated bv , the -' Ci tY ,. no later than May 15. 5. The City will publish ads in the Maplewood Review and St. Paul Dispatch requestina insurance quotations. - - r- 6. Insurance quotations will be due by mid -June and they will be evaluated by the City with assistance from members of the Insurance Committee that did not submit quotations. 7. A recommendation will be made to City Council at its June 27th meeting regarding placement of insurance coverages effective July 1st. 8. Items that must be considered regarding an ordinance for a new Insurance Committee are elimination of the residency requirement, - requirement that insurance specifications drafted by the Committee be drawn to promote competition, Committee members that evaluate quotations cannot submit a quotation, and insurance commissions must not be split among committee members* When the meeting adjourned, it was decided that future meetings would be on an informal basis until a new ordinance is drafted to reform the Insurance Committee. The only viable alternative to an Insurance Committee in the future would be the use of a professional risk management firm to determine necessary insurance coverages, draft specifications and evaluate quotations. At least three metro- pol i tan area cities have recently hired a professional risk management firm. These cities are Burnsville, Eden Prairie and Bloomington. It would cost approx- Y $2,400imatel i f we were to hire a professional risk management firm. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the attached ordinance (Exhibit D) be approved for first reading. DFF :Inb Exhibit A Page 1 of 2 2 -86 MAPLEWOOD CODE -ADMINISTRATION 2 -100 b) The provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 419.01 through 6) Be an insurance agent covered by errors and omissions 419.18, providing for the powers and duties of the commission, are insurance. hereby adopted and made a part of this chapter as if fully set forth b) All parties so qualifying shall be reported to the council andherein. (Ord. No. 223 1 3 -3 -67)to .e committee an w remain members o com-appointed tho itt and i b f the c m-civillawreferences -- Existing civil service commission in a city not affected upon the adoption' of the Optional Plan B council- manager form of government,mittee until they fail to meet the aforesaid qualms cations or resign M.S. § 412.621, subd. 2; authority for city to create a police civil service commission,from said committee. M.S. f 419.01; authority for city to adopt the provisions of state law in the above section, M.S. f$ 419.01, 471.62.c) The committee shall, within thirty (30) days after its annual meeting, provide the council with a full report of its precedings for Secs. 2- 87- -2 -95. Reserved.the year, including an up -to -date list of the members of the commit- tee and the offices held in the committee by said members. (Ord. DIVISION 4. INSURANCE COMMITTEE No. 316, § 3 Q 210.020) Sec. 2 -96. Established; purpose; function; etc.Sec. 2 -98. Officers; meetings; annual meeting. There is hereby established for the city an insurance committee The insurance committee created in this division shall elect its as an advisory board to the city council to obtain, when ordered by own officers and establish meeting times; except that, the annual the city council, the best insurance coverage for the city at the most meeting shall occur on the last Thursday in October at 7:30 p.m. in reasonable rates. (Ord. No. 316, § 2 (§ 210.010),6-8-72)the city hall. (Ord. No. 316, § 4 Q 210.030) 6 -8 -72) Sec. 2 -97. Qualifications of members; indefinite terms of Sec. 2 -99. Duties. office; annual report. The duties of the insurance committee created in this division a) A member of the insurance committee created in this division shall be as follows: must have the following qualifications and he must: 1) To review, study and make recommendations to the city 1) Bea natural person.council in regard to the insurance coverage and program for 2) Have been a resident of the city or a period of one ear, orypy ,the city; have maintained his principal office in the city for the sale of 2) To prepare specifications for insurance coverage to be pre - insurance for a period of one year immediately preceding his sented to the council; becoming a member, and shall continue to be a resident throughout his membership on the committee.3) Consult with the city manager and various members of the staff relative to insurance programs; 3) Be licensed to transact all lines of insurance which the com- mittee may place for the city, and have been so licensed for 4) Upon order of the city council to obtain such contracts of at least one year before being d into membershiygaccetep p insurance and bonds as are requested by the council. (Ord. No. 316, § 5 210.040),6-8-72) 4) Derive at least seventy -five (75) per cent of his earned in- come from his occupation as an insurance agent, and must Sec. 2 -100. Compensation and expenses. remain active in the sale and service of insurance. The insurance committee created in this division shall pay all of 5) Not be an employee of the city, nor hold an elective public its own expenses, including compensation to the members, if any, office in the city. 78 79 2 -100 MAPLEWOOD CODE Exhibit A Page 1 of 2 from earned commissions on the insurance obtained for the city. The city shall have no further obligation to pay compensation or expenses. (Ord. No. 316, § 6 (§ 210-050),6-8-72) Sec. 2 -101. Bylaws. a) The bylaws of the insurance committee created in this divi- sion shall be approved by the city council, and three (3) copies of which shall be kept on file in the office of the city clerk. b) Any amendment to such bylaws shall be effective only on approval by resolution of the city council. (Ord. No. 316, § 7 (§ 210.060) The next page is 1311 80 Governmental Risk Management Manual SUPPLEMENT No. 39 Exhibit B. Page o 7 This material deals with application of Antitrust Laws to insurance purchase and should be placed in. the Manual following page 8 -56. TO /A n ° v1 t' LA CUur t tt Ctiy Manai ,r City Clerk Diretor Pub. Works Director Comm. Dev. D . Comni. Sear. Director Personnel Director ther L• -an"Munnomuft AM . Director of Finance DATE ,2 Exhibit Page 2 of 7 f Antitrust and Insurance Purchasing INTRODUCTION Ever since the passage of the Sherman Antitrust Act in 1890, local school boards have been oper- ating under the concept that they were exempt from the operation and application of that law. With the United States Supreme Court decision of January 1, 1982, in Community Communica- tions Company, Inc. v. City of Boulder, Colorado, et al. (No. 80- 1350), this has all changed. In that decision, a majority of the court said that local jurisdictions are subject to the antitrust laws. This decision can have tremendous impact on the way that political subdivisions of the state purchase various products and services, in- cluding insurance. For whatever reason, insurance appears to be the last vestige of the patronage system in local governments! Many have already cleaned up their act!" Others have not. It is the intent of this article to look at the situation involved in insurance purchases in light of the Boulder decision from a non -legal view- point and make recommendations how to avoid the potential lawsuits that could develop from the use of illegal methods of purchase. THE BOULDER DECISION In 1943, in Parker v. Brown (317 U .S. 341), the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the question of whether the federal antitrust laws prohibited the State, in the exercise of its soverei powers, from imposing certain anticompetitive restraints. It was noted that California's program "derived its authority ... from the legislative command of the state (at page 350), and was therefore exempt, by virtue of the Sherman Act's own limitations, from antitrust attack." The Court stated: We find nothing in the language of the Sherman Act or its history which suggests that its purpose was to restrain a state or its officers or agents from activities directed by its legislature. In a dual system of gov- ernment in which, under the Constitution, the states are sovereign, save only as Congress may constitu- tionally subtract from their authority, an unex- pressed purpose to nullify a state's control over its officers and agents is not lightly to be attributed to Congress (at pages 350 - 351). The availability of this exemption to a State's municipalities was presented in City of Lafay- ette, Louisiana v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 435 U.S. 389) in 1978. In reviewing the appli- Supplement No. 39 (11/82) cabi l ity of the "state action" doctrine enunciated in the Parker decision, the Court stated: Cities are not themselves sovereign; they do not re- ceive al the federal deference of the States that create them. Parker's limitation of the exemption to "official action directed by a state" is consistent with the fact that the States' subdivisions generally have not been treated as equivalents of the States themselves. In light of the serious economic dislo- cation which could result if cities were free to place their own parochial interests above the Nation's economic goals reflected in the antitrust laws, we are especially unwilling to presume that Congress intended to exclude anticompetitive municipal ac- tion from their reach (at pages 412 -413). The state might sanction anticompetitive muni- cipal activities and thereby immunize municipal- ities from antitrust liability. The "state policy" that was thus relied upon would have to be clearly articulated and affirmatively expressed" at page 410). The Court further stated that ours is a "dual system of government, which has no place for sovereign cities" (at page 351). In the City of Lafayette decision, the court stated that municipalities are not themselves sovereign and that accordingly they could partake of the Parker exemption only to the extent that they acted pu rsu an t to a clearly articula ted and affirma tively expressed State policy (at pages 412 -413; empha- sis supplied). Such a requirement of "clear articulation and affirmative expression" is not satisfied when the State's position is one of mere neutrality re- specting the municipal actions challenged as anticompetitive. As a result of the Boulder decision, one can state categorically that, unless that state legis- lature clearly articulates and affirmatively ex- presses it to be state policy to permit a local government — city, town, county, or sch oo I dis- trict -- to regulate itself in purchasing proce- dures, such Focal government may find itself subject to the antitrust laws if it uses anticom- petitive procedures. INSURANCE PURCHASING PROCEDURES There are numerous methods employed by local government in the purchase of insurance, rang- ing from the award to a local agent /broker on a political patronage basis to competitive bidding. A brief look at these procedures follows. 8 -57 Award Politically Motivated. In this type of situ- ation, members of the Board or Council are per- mitted to award insurance constracts to local agents /brokers who reside in their district and are, at a minimum, members of the same political party, to advise and write their insurance policies. Let it be stated that this procedure may be used by any political party. At a local level, a county did use a system whereby each Supervisor was permitted to award 11 insurance policies (out of a total of 33) to agents /brokers living in his /her district. These were obviously awarded to those agents /brokers who "supported' that Supervisor. Use of an Agents' Association. In some jurisdic- tions, the local agents' association is the organi- zation that both advises and writes the insurance for that jurisdiction. This may or may not be politically motivated; usually it is not. It is merely the "easy" way to do it. The procedure may be by a formal contract with the association, it may be by formal resolution of the governing body, or it may be merely informal. In any case, the commissions on the insurance are usually shared among the members of the association, with the member who actually writes and services the ac- count receiving a larger share of the commission for his /her efforts. In other cases the association itself, where this is legal, may receive the entire commission and use it as the association sees fit. Use of a Committee of Local Agents. In this type of situation, a committee is selected by the gov- erning body from a list of applicants. The appli- cants may be any agent in the community, or it may be that just members of the local agents' association are solicited for applications. The members of the committee then advise the juris- diction on their insurance needs and write the appropriateate insurance. Members of the commit- tee may receive either the commissions on this insurance or may merely receive either the com- missions on this insurance or may merely receive a fee in lieu of such commissions. Use of Competitive Bidding. Under this format, formal specifications are drafted either by in- house staff or by outside contractors and dis- tributed to the insurance marketplace for bids. When the bids are received, they are analyzed and an award made to the lowest and best bid. The idea behind this is to take insurance out of the political arena and receive the best contract, service, and price available in the marketplace. Use of Pre - Qualification of Agents /Brokers. This method started in California and has spread to other parts of the country. Agents /brokers are asked to complete a questionnaire and, those Exhibit B Page * 3 of 7 selected from the respondents are to participate in an interview. The one, two, or three top par- ticipants are then selected to represent. the juris- diction to the insurance marketplace to receive the best contract and price for the coverage re- quested. The competition is between the agents/ brokers selected, and the bidding that takes place is between those agents /brokers who complete the questionnaires. Compensation may be on a commission or a fee basis. INSURANCE PLACEMENT AND ANTITRUST APPLICATION From those placement procedures listed above, it is clear that the last two -- competitive bid- ding and pre - qualification — if done properly, have no involvement with the antitrust laws. It is not so clear for the first three methods. On January 10, 1977, the Attorney General for the State of Arizona issued opinion 77 -4 1375 -747, R75 -760). It may be of interest to know that the Attorney General at that time is now the Governor of the State of Arizona. The opinion is based on two questions raised by a State Senator: 1. whether a school board may purchase group insurance coverage for district employees with- out competitive bidding; and 2. whether a school board can legally provide group insurance coverage for its employees through the services of an advisory committee composed of insurance agents who each receive a portion of the insurance commission generated by the pur- chase of such insurance. The answer to the first question raised is not of paramount importance for the purpose of this article; however, several comments of the At- torney General are of interest. It was stated in the opinion that school districts are considered to be political subdivisions of the State rather than state agencies. Though this is applicable to only Arizona, it is probably the interpretation that would be obtained by most, if not all, of the school districts in the country if such a ques- tion was raised. It was further concluded that, in Arizona, the competitive bidding requirement A. R.S. 41 -730) does not mandate the use of competitive bidding by school districts. The Attorney General went on, however, to state that it should be emphasized that school districts, like all public agencies, have a fiduciary obligation to obtain maximum return for each tax dollar spent. . In answer to the second question raised, the Attorney General stated that the insurance ad- visory committee poses potential antitrust viola- tions. These potential antitrust violations are 8 -58 Supplement No. 39 (11/82)` based on two fronts: the problem of commission splitting by an advisory group of insurance ad- P 9 visors charged with recommending an insurance carrier and, to the extent the advisory board conspires to eliminate competitors, its behavior would constitute the establishment or mainten- ance of a monopoly or attempt to monopolize in violation of the law. Thus, if an advisory committee of insurance agents both advises and then places the insur- ance it has so advised purchasing, it may be in violation of the Arizona antitrust statutes as an unlawful agreement among competitors to allo- cate customers. An agreement among competi- tors (the agents) to allocate customers or classes of customers is a per se violation of the antitrust laws United States v. Consolidated Laundries Corp. 291 F. 2d 563 (1961), and the school boar should not lend its tacit approval to the scheme. The use of an advisory committee raises po- tential problems analogous to the scheme in Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide Corp., 370 U.S. 690 (1962) where the Canadian govern- ment designated an industry member as its ex- clusive purchasing agent for vanadium. There, the court found the alleged conspiracy between the defendants and the purchasing agent to ex- clude Continental from the market was not immune from the reach of the antitrust laws. A more serious question was raised by the Attorney -- whetherwhether or not a school board itself would also be liable because of its involvement with the advisory board. Under the Parker decision, it had been assumed that gov- ernmental bodies themselves were immune from the antitrust laws. With the decision in the Boul- der case, that assumption has been dispelled un less it is undertaken under the clearly articulated and affirmatively expressed policy of the state legislature. A further question involves the po- tential liability of an individual public official as distinguished from a governmental body for par- ticipation in an unlawful conspiracy. Not only did the opinion hold the advisory committee in violation of the antitrust laws, but went fuher and viewed that the commission splitting arrangement among committee mem- bers would also violate the insurance code of Arizona. In this regard, too, he noted that an Arizona statute prohibits a successful bidder for insurance to the State to directly or indirectly split commissions with a person who has not P erformed services. Though that particular statute relates to the state, it is the opinion of the Attorney General that it at least suggests a general legislative policy against the splitting ofg commissions. Thus, the pract ice of sharing com- missions with "advisors" who are not themselves rendering ubstantial services raises seriousous ques- Supplement No. 39 (11/82) Exhibit B Page 4 of 7 t 9ionsofillegality and should not be tolerated by any public body. In 1976, the Attorney General of the State of Missouri issued a set of advisory guidelines with respect to the purchase of insurance by political subdivisions which were attached to the Arizona opinion. These guidelines were the result of an exhaustive study of insurance purchasing P ractices of Missouri municipalities. Let us look at these guidelines. The Missouri Attorney General determined that the following practices have the effect of excluding insurance firms or agencies from com- peting for a local political subdivision's insurance business and, as such, are unreasonable restraints on trade and violative of state and federal anti- trust laws: 1. successively awarding insurance coverage to the same firm or agency without affording other firms or agencies the opportunity to compete; 2. splitting the award of insurance coverage among local firms or agencies; 3 awarding the insurance coverage to only local firms or agencies; 4. utilizing competitive bidding but with the re- str ionion that only local firms or agencies be allowed to compete; 5. utilizing an agent of record system but re stricting the agent of record to a local firm or agency, which agent retains a percentage of the commission earned on the insurance premium with the remainder of the commis sion being split on an agreed - upon manner among other agencies; 6. awarding the insurance coverage only through local insurance agents' associations or like committees of selected insurance agents; and 7. restricting those firms or agencies who can compete for a municipality's insurance cov- ers 9a to firms or agencies which reside in, maintain offices in, pay taxes in, or main- tain some other form of localized contact with the municipality. From this it can be seen that one of the prin cipa I objections is the limitation to only local firms or agencies. It must be remembered that an insurance agent /broker is licensed by the state; therefore, such agent /broker is authorized to write insurance anywhere in the state. Such a limitation against non -local agents /brokers would constitute an undue restraint of trade. The Attorney General did, however, provide some guidelines or methods that could be em - P Ylo ed that would not be violative of the anti - trust laws. The political subdivision has the 8 -59 authority to assure itself that the writing agent and underwriting insurance company are repu- table and will provide the necessary service both before the implementation of an insurance plan as well as follow -up service after the coverage has been purchased. As examples: a minimum rating by A. M. Best Company may be required of the underwriting company; a financial and reputation check may be made on the agent/ broker; a requirement that the agent orcompany have a designated number of years in the busi- ness of insurance; a requirement that the agent/ broker be reasonably accessible to provide con- tinuing service (without being a subterfuge to allow only a select group of persons to monop- olize the business); competitive bidding is another way that would not offend the antitrust laws (again only if agents in a larger geographical area are allowed to bid); and finally the use of an agent of record after an interviewing process has been followed that is designed to secure the widest possible choice. When this latter method is employed, the political subdivision should im- plement a program whereby all interested agents or firms which are capable of providing such service are afforded the opportunity to compete for the position. Again, exclusionary restrictions cannot be established that allow only local agents or a select group of agents the opportunity to compete for such a position. To avoid a conflict with the antitrust laws, the political subdivision must utilize a system that affords all interested parties who qualify under reasonable and predetermined criteria an equal opportunity to sell the insurance coverage that is needed. COMMISSION SPLITTING In all too many cases, especially where an asso- ciation of agents or an agent's committee is used for the placement of insurance, the commissions that are received are shared with numerous agents. Few, if any, of those agents receiving a share of the commission have performed any ser- vices for that share. The Superintendent of In- surance of the State of New York has established a rule that prohibits such sharing of commissions with agents who have performed no services. At least two Attorneys General have given opinions that rule this to be against the state and federal antitrust laws. It is understood that the Attorney General of the State of New Hampshire has handed down a similar opinion. Rather than splitting commissions with other agents, some associations or committees use part of the commission to purchase various items for which there is no budget. At the annual meeting of the Public Risk and Insurance Association Exhibit B Page 5 of PR I MA) held in San Antonio, Felix Kloman, President of Risk Planning Group in Darien, Con- necticut, told of such an association. They used 40% of the commissions for the purchase of various items for a municipality. The statement was then made that they could have received 40% less commission and saved the municipality that much money in its insurance premiums. If a political subdivision does not budget for an item, then using commissions to purchase that same item is a mere subterfuge on the part of the gov- erning authority inasmuch as budgeted funds — insurance premiums are being used, at least in part, to purchase unbudgeted items. The pur- chased items are usually determined after con- sultation with the governing authorities. AN EXAMPLE In light of what has been stated, an example of the type of activity that has been discussed is in order. In this example one should bear in mind that nothing will be said or implied that the in- surance actually purchased on behalf of the municipality i.s out of order; however, this is merely a discussion of the method of placement. On June 25, 1982, the City of Phoenix, Ari- zona, executed a Memorandum of Understanding No. 29934) with the City of Phoenix Insurance Committee, hereafter referred to as the Commit- tee. This is a matter of public record. The sole question regarding this memorandum is in re- gard to the placement of insurance as it relates to previous discussion in this Supplement. Pertinent sections of this memorandum are as follows: C. ... All such proposals shall include a provision that the total commission shall be withheld by the Com- mittee as now or hereinafter constituted, or its suc- cessors,, as trustees for a special account of the In- dependent Insurance Agents of Phoenix. This account shall be used for expenditures necessary .to maintain executive office and personnel for. the pri- mary purpose of servicing the insurance business of the City. The expenditures of money from this spe.- vial fund over that necessary to maintain a reason- able executive off ice and personnel is to be used for expenditures involving the public betterment of the City of Phoenix embracing such subjects as fire pre- vention, safety programs, and the advancement of the Independent Insurance Agents of Phoenix. The control of this special account shall be in the hands of the five members of the City Insurance Committee and the President, Vice- President, and Secretary- Treasurer of the Independent Insurance Agents of Phoenix. D. Arrangements may be made for proposals outside the membership of the committee if such action is deemed necessary to obtain the best competitive proposal for the City. Such outside proposals will be 8 -60 Supplement No. 39 (11/82) C1C11 1 U I V v Page 6 of 7 Placed through the Committee with as much of the commission as possible to be paid to the special fund of the Phoenix Association. 1. The members of the Committee shall be appointed by the City Council from nominations submitted by the Independent Insurance Agents of Phoenix. The Association shall submit three names for each va- cancy to be filled, each of whom shall be a legal resident of the City of Phoenix. In light of the opinion of the Attorney Gen- eral of Arizona (77-4) discussed earlier in this Supplement, the question can be raised as to whether or not the City Council of Phoenix, act- in 9 in a fiduciary capacity for public funds, is obtaining the maximum return for each tax dollar spent on insurance. That same opinion raises the further question of whether an insurance advisory committee poses potential antitrust violations. The bases for this question are: commission splitting and an attempt to monopolize. As previously stated, if an advisory committee of insurance agents both advises and the places the insurance . it has so ad- vised purchasing, it may be in violation of the Arizona antitrust statutes as an unlawful agree- ment among competitors to allocate customers. The previous discussion also refers to the recommendations of the Attorney General of the State of Missouri. Among practices that he determined to be unreasonable restraints on trade and violative of state and federal antitrust laws are: 3. awarding the insurance coverage to only local firms or agencies; 6. awarding the insurance coverage only through local insurance agents' associations or like committees of selected insurance agents; 7. restricting those firms or agencies who can compete for a municipality's insurance cov- era 9 a to firms or agencies which. reside in, maintain offices in, pay taxes in, or main- tain some other form of localized contact with the municipality. . As noted above, the names submitted to fill each vacancy on the Committee "shall be legal resi- dents of the City of Phoenix, thus exclud residents of any other city in the State of Arizona from competing for this business. According to the opinions referred to earlier, this appears to be a restraint of trade and, thus, violative of the antitrust laws of the nation and the states. Most,if not all states, including Arizona, have a statutory provision against the splitting of com- missions with other persons not similarly licensed. In Arizona this is A.R.S. Section 20 -3116. This Supplement No. 39 (11/82) question arises inasmuch as the commissions re- ce Yivedb the Committee are received by it as trustees for a special account of the Independent Insurance Agents of Phoenix. One may interpret that as splitting, or even giving, the commission to the association which, in all likelihood, is not a licensed agent. Though not an antitrust ques-tionitisanothermarkagainstthismethodof placement. In a true commission splitting arrangement, other agents, usually members of the association, would receive a share of the commission without rendering any service. Indi- rectly, one could say this case is one of commis- sion splitting in that the dues of the association are not as high as they otherwise might be if the had to support the office and personnel of Y _ the association entirely. _ Anothe r area of potential illegal activity is that provision in the memorandum in which it- states that funds not used otherwise will be used for the public betterment of the City of Phoenix, including such programs as fire prevention and safety, Again, most, if not all, states have an Un- fair Trade Practices article in their insurance code. In Arizona, this is Article 6, Chapter 2, Title 20. A.R.S. Section 20 - 452 specifically refers to illegal inducements. In that section, among otherg provisions, it is against the law to give an insured any prizes, goods, wares, merchandise or tan- property f an aggregate value in excess ofgableprop two dollars. , y There are few items that can be used for P u bl is betterment that cost less than two dollars! If your political subdivision has a contract, memorandum, or Council resolution that has any of the provisions mentioned in this example, or ones similar to them, you may be in violation of state and /or federal antitrust laws. Further, you may be in violation of your state.'s insurance cod 9e. Agents as a group, are public spirited citi zens of their community. Why they permit t hem - selves and their community to become involved in such activities is only speculation. Rather than speculate, why not take the appropriate action before' Legal suits are filed? CONCLUSION In all too many political subdivisions, the method employed for the purchase of insurance is viola- tive of both the state and federal antitrust laws. Prior to the Boulder decision, this apparently posed no problem for the governing authorities inasmuch as it was believed that they were not subject to the antitrust laws. That decision changed everything! Competitive bidding is not the only solution to the problem. As a matter of fact, as pointed out by the Attorney General of the State of 8 -61 Missouri, under certain circumstances, even com- petitive bidding might . be violative of the .anti- trust taws. Properly done, competitive bidding is but one way to avoid the potential penalties of the law. The pre - qualification of the agent/ broker through the use of predetermined criteria is another way. The crux of the question is whether or not the political jurisdiction imposes unjust geographical limitations upon qualified agents /brokers. As a final comment, bear in mind that the penalties of the Sherman Act include triple Exhibit B Page 7 of 7 damages. There is some current thought that individual members of governing bodies might be liable as well as the political subdivision itself. It is unfair to your public to continue a method of insurance purchasing that may cause you to pay a higher price than. competition would dic- tate as well as for them to have a governing body that violates the law in its activities. It is sug- gested, therefore, that, you submit your current practice of insurance purchasing to legal scrutiny by your legal counsel. 1 Exhibit C Page 1 of 3 LAIS, BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING a' STH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 DONALD L. LAIS JOHN F. BANNIGAN, JR. PATRICK ). KELLY April 27, 1983 Mr. Barry Evans City Manager 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, NAT 55109 AREA CODE 612 224.3781 Re: City of Maplewood Agent's Insurance Committee Dear Barry: I received a copy of an Agreement between the Attorney General and certain insurance agents for the 'City of Virginia, Minnesota filed in District Court of Ramsey County and titled "Assurance of Discontinuance". I checked with the Attorney General's office and have had extensive discussions with Steve Killgriff'of that office regarding the insurance committee in the City of Maplewood. Mrogg Killgriff is the attorney who obtained the Assurance and Discon- tinuance with the Virginia agents. . That agreement provides the following: A. Each such-bid or offer shall be made independantly and not in conjunction with any other insurance agent or agency; B. There shall be no discussion or contact with any other insurance agent or agency regarding the terms or nature of the bid or offer; and C. Any commission received from the sale or provision of such insurance shall not be shared with any other insurance agent or agency. Mr. Kil lgrif f advised me that it was his position that if any of the above elements, that is A. B or C. were taking place they would constitute a violation of the Minnesota Antitrust Law and possiblyossibl the Federal Antitrust Laws. This becomes significant to the City because of the decision of Community Communicat ions Company, Inc. of the City of Boulder, Colorado, et al wherein the U.S. Supreme Court said that local 7 7jurisdictionsaresubject to the Antitrust Laws.. This Exhibit C Page 2 of 3 Mr. Barry Evans Page 2 April 27, 1983 means that the City could be subject to a lawsuit by some person who is excluded by the residency requirement of Section 2 -97 Subdi- vision A, Subsection 2 of our ordinance or from some other provision of the ordinance. The City could also be subject to suit by a taxpayer who may challenge the particular application of the ordinance to the actual purchase of insurance. Section 2 -99 provides the duties of the committee. Subsections 1, 2 and 3 deal with obtaining information concerning needs of the City, preparation of specifications and recommendations to the council for insurance coverage. Subsection 4 provides as follows: Upon order of the City Council to obtain such contracts of insurance and bonds as are required by the Council." This latter section is defective since it does not provide for any safeguards to the City in the obtaining of the insurance. In Supplement No. 39 to Governmental Risk Management Manual issued in November of 1982, quotes from the opinion of the attorney general of the State of Arizona wherein he was asked "Whether a school board can legally provide insurance coverage for its employees for the services of an advisory committee composed of insurance agents who each receive a portion of the insurance commission generated by the purchase of such insurance. " The Arizona attorney general stated that such use of the advisory committee posed potential Antitrust violations on two fronts: "The problem of commission splitting by an advisory group of insurance advisors charged with recommending an insurance carrier, and, to the extent the advisory board conspires to eliminate competitors, its behavior would constitute the establish- ment or maintenance of a monopoly or attempt .to monopolize in violation of the law. " He went on to say: "Thus, if an advisory committee of insurance agents both advises ;and then places the insurance it has so advised purchasing, it may be in violation of the Arizona Antitrust Statutes as an unlawful agreement among competitors to allocate customers. An agreement among competitors to allocate customers or classes of customers is per se in violation of the antitrust laws, he sites the United States v Consolidated Laundries., Corp., 291 F 2d 563 (1961) and goes on to say that the school board should not lend its tacit approval to the scheme." Exhibit C Page 3 of 3 Mr. Barry Evans Page 3 April 2 7, 1983 The Maplewood Agents Insurance Committee was established to solve the problem wherein one agent was regularly awarded the insurance business without affording other f firms . or agencies the opportunity to compete and thus was an improvement the system in place when the committee was established. The Boulder decision now makes the City vulnerable to court actions under our existing ordinance and the practices of the City in connection with the agents insurance committee. It is, therefor, my opinion that the City should abandon its present ordinance and method of obtaining insurance and resort to a method which will not be in violation of antitrust laws. Very truly yours, BANNIG & KELLY, P.A. onal Lais DLL: cg Exhibit D ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTIONS OF THE MAPLEWOOD CODE RELATING TO THE INSURANCE COMMITTEE THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. This ordinance does hereby repeal Sections 2 -96 through2 -101 of the Maplewood Code, Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage and publication. Passed by the City, Counci i of the City of Maplewood this day_ of 91983 Mayor Attest: Ayes - Clerk Nays - MEMORANDUM 91 TO: City Manager, FROM: Assistant City Engineer DATE: April 28, 1983 SUBJECT: McKnight Road Trunk Water Main and Elevated Tank Re. Project No. 83 -4 Booster service improvements to service area no. 6 were previously contemplated and studied under Project No. 78 -191. In 1979, the City Council ordered construction of water main on McKnight Road from Larpenteur Avenue south to the railroad right -of -way. It was anticipated that this project could be extended to connect to the facilities under the Maryland Avenue improvement. The ordering was subject to the Hill crest Develop- ment Corporation entering into a developers agreement for payment of a portion of the improvements. The developer did not execute the agreement within the time limitation and the project was, therefore, terminated, In 1981, a revised study considering only the McKnight Road water main improve- ment was authorized. As a result of the study,: it was apparent that a substantia cost savings cou 1 d be realized if the water main construction could be performed in conjunction with-the County's McKnight Road improvement. The street improve- ments were anticipated to begin this year. Recent contact with Ramsey County indicates that a more likely time for the construction of roadway along the s u -b j e ct route w i l l be in 1985. Postponing the water main improvement two more years, in an area of the City with the most critical water service deficiency, may not be in the best interest of the Maplewood citizens. The existing system near the Stillwater Road--Maryland Avenue area has low static pressures and simple hydrant flushing interrupts normal domestic service. During peak usage periods the St. Paul Stillwater tank operates dangerously close to empty. Several developers are currently bu i.l di ng residential dwellings in previousl approved PUD' s and several other developers are seriously considering new developments within the next year in the Maryland Avenue area. These develop- ments will tax the already deficient water distribution system and storage facilities. We are therefore, recommending that the City Council authorize the updating of the 1981 feasibi study with consideration to include studying the need and costs associated with a 1.0 million gallon elevated storage tank near Stillwater Road and T. H. 1200 RESOLUTION -- CALLING FOR PRELIMINARY PLANS WHEREAS, The City Council has proposed that the area described as: Service Area No. 6, City Improvement No. 83 -4 be improved by construction of an elevated storage tank and trunk water main improvement along McKnight Road from Larpenteur Avenue to the Lakewood Drive -- Maryland Avenue intersection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the proposed improvement be referred to the City Engineer, who is hereby instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and should best be made as proposed, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. 4 HOLLOW AVE. 1ITIERNEYAVE . S ST. H NO 212 W O W -- 8 cr cr 3 k' ASRIPLEYv AVE . tLi I fit Q 0 cr 3 cr0 v W LARPENTEUR AVE. V o zsd sod EX T, 12 we M. i IDAHO AVE.t . W J cr o 0 rn HILLCREST DEVELOPMENT SITE 120 AC RES v m ao n z R G 4 V Z o ° W 4j w z L S EN Q Q Q NOKOMIS tr } cn W E. MARYL AND AVE Q MARYLAND AVE. l W]ft EXT. 16* w. M. Z 51-g GERANwM 0 J BEAVf'R Y GERAIV IU AVELAXFJM 5 APPROVED FILE NO. r 78107 - - . .. : , ._ LOCAT ION. MAP DA DRAWING Na 8/2,/78 w 5 f" r MEMORANDUM T0: City Manager FROM: Director of Public Works i v, 1 -• - =4-- SUBJECT: F e a s i b i l i ty Study -- Beaver Lake North= DATE: May Z, 1983?i The property along Maryland Avenue between Lakewood Drive and Century Avenue is developing very rapidly. Considering recent construction and proposed construction for the near future, over 1000 housing units are involved. All of this development will contribute to increasing the stormwater runoff from the drainage area. The developers in the area are required to construct ons i to storm sewers. The main outlet for the entire area, however, is not complete. The City has an opportunity at this time to install the main outlet as development takes place. This has several advantages. The City can work with developers to locate ponds and drainage easements acceptable to both before platting is complete. Developers can be required to grant easements rather than the City buying easemen if acquisition is accomplished after platting. At this time, a relatively few property owners are involved where. in a few years the number will be substantial. The attached map shows the subject drainage area and identifies the larger developments. This watershed currently drains to Beaver Lake through a ditch south of Maryland Avenue. It is expected that thi corridor will also be used for the permanent outlet. This creates some concern since the present trunk sanitary sewer is parallel to the ditch. The sanitary sewer in question is expected to be under capacity at some time in the future. It would be advantageous for the City to investi sanitary sewer replacement along with the storm sewer improvements. - It is recommended the City Council authorize preparation of a feasibility study investigating the main storm sewer outlet for that area generally bounded by McKnight Road, Stillwater Road, Century Avenue and the Chicago Northwestern Railroad tracks. In additi alternatives should be inves- tigated for replacement of the trunk sanitary sewer. jw Attachment 7- LJ O1RDI1NkNCE NO. AN ORDINANCE A4 REGULATING THE REVIEW OF YffiM L POLE BUILDINGS The City Council of the City of Maplewood does hereby ordain as follows: section 1. Section 202.240 of the Maplewood (ode is hereby added to read 'as follows: 202.2 40 SPECIAL AREAS 1. It shall be unlawful to erect a metal building in the City of Maplewood which is of a design commonly referred to as *a "metal pole building", "pole barn" or "agri- building" , unless such building would be located in a F. Fanrnn Residence District or unless such building is a n etal storage building oommnly used as a back yard storage shed. - - Should any dispute arise over the classification of a proposed metal building, the Director of Commmity Development shall determine whether the proposed metal building fits into the 'metal pole building" category. Appeals of the Director's decision shall be made to the City Council for a determination of building type. 2. Buildings having metal exteriors, but not - being of the typical pole building design, may only be allowed in areas zoned F, Farm Residence, B C, Business O mercial, ill, Light Manufacturing and N-2, Heavy manufacturing. Special architectural design and norunetal decorative modifications may be required to assure compatibility with co amenity development. 3. The City Council may hear requests for variances from the literal previsions of this ordinance in instances where its strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and to grant such variances only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in* keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Undue .hardship" is used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under the conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner and variance from the ordinance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Sectioaz 2. Zhis ordinance shall take effect and be in force after its passage and publication. Passed by the City council of . the City . o f Maplewood, eta, this day of , 1983 . Mayor Attest: Ayes _ City Clerk Na s _y CITY OF -z bAAP EWOOD 1380 FROST AVEN t' E MAPLEWOOI)* MINNESOTA 55109 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY SERVICES 770 - 4570 MEMORANDUM action b To: Barry Evans, City Manager nor From: Pauline Staples, Assistant Director S u b Maplewood - °- F -- Shirts Hats '` `' :yi J RejectedDatoMarch1 , 198 3 Dat The printing company and t -shirt business would l i k e to know the status of the t -shirt order. They would l i k e to begin work and need the down payment. We need to know the following: 7) What budget is the down payment coming from? 2) What department is selling the articles? 3) What items are they going to go with? 4) What logo do you wish to have? 5) What colors? 6) What will the selling price be? 7) Number of articles they wish to purchase in each category? Would appreciate an answer as soon as possible on this. t MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA Frc ree.leaxcCr rinan. R C/C ealDrarse 171arozrn -t 80 MAPLEWOOD T -SHIRT ORDER ARTICLE COST TO US SELLING COST 5 XL - HAT 2.25 ea.3.50 ea. 10 LADIES V -NECK 5.50 ea.7.00 ea. 10 T -SHIRT f ADULT GOLF 7.95 ea.9.00 ea. SHIRT LONG- SLEEVED 5.20 - Youth 6.50 Youth T -SHIRT 5.50 - Adult 7.50 Adult COTTON SHORT-2.35 - Youth 3.50 ea. SLEEVED SHIRT LADIES T -SHIRT 5.10 ea.7.00 ea. HAT COLORS NUMBER ORDERED GOLD 36 MAROON 36 LADIES V-NECK T -SHIRT LOGO ON LEFT SIDE UPPER COLORS SIZES & NUMBER ORDERED GOLD SMALL - 5 MED. -10 LARGE -10 MAROON SMALL - 5 MED. -10 LARGE -10 ADULT GOLF SHIRT LOGO ON POCKET COLORS SIZES & NUMBER ORDERED GOLD SMALL - 10 MED.. -10 LARGE -20 MAROON SMALL - 10 MED. -10 LARGE -20 LONG - SLEEVED T- SHIRT SMALL LOGO ON LEFT SIDE COLORS ADULT SIZES ONLY SIZES & NUMBER ORDERED G OLD SMALL - 5 MED. -10 LARGE -10 MAROON SMALL - 5 MED.10 LARGE -10 COTTON SHORT - SLEEVED SH I RT LARGE LOGO IN MIDDLE PROFIT 1,25 ea. 111 ea. f 1.05 ea. 1.30 ea. 2.00 ea. 1.15 ea. 1.90 ea. XL -5 XL -5 XL -15 XL -15 XL 10 XL --10 COLORS. SIZES & NUMBER ORDERED (SIZES 10 -12 -14 ONLY) GOLV SMALL - 10 MED.. - 10 LARGE - 10 MAROON SMALL - 10 MED . 10 LARGE - 10 LADIES T -SHIRT ROUND NECK LOGO ON LEFT UPPER SIDE COLORS SIZES & NUMBER ORDERED GOLD SMALL 5 M ED.10 LARGE -10 'XL - 'S 5 MAROON SMALL 5 MED. no 10 LARGE 10 XL - M arch 30, 1983 MEMORANDUM To: Director of Public Safety Kenneth Collins Frqm: Fire Marshal A. C. Schadt Subject: National Fire Code Update lid' L 0 Ul t (r ...N Endc :.. Igo f v 4..• Re Date._.r This office has now received the 1983 updated National Fire Codes published by the National Fire Protection Association. In order to be consistent with our City Ordinance Article II, Section 12-51, it is recommended by this office that the present Code publishing year be changed from 1979 to 1983. Attached for your information is a copy of the Code Section that indicates the necessary change that would be required by Council action. Your endorsement and follow - p relative to the above is recommended by this office. ACS: js r r re 112 -31 MAPLEWOOD CODE 9:00 a. d 9:00 p.m. on any day. All commerci ings shall be require ve installed within or wit building an incinerator con d pursuant to cit coon and approval. Code 1965, § 1401. . No. 25 - 26 -69) F Sec. 12 -32. On road No fire shall a started by any perso a surface of any bituminous, t or oil - treated roadway in the any time. Code 1 401.060) 12- 33- 12 -50. Reserved. ARTICLE II. FIRE CODES. Sec. 12 -51. Adoption of National Fire Codes. There is hereby adopted by the city, for the purpose of prescrib- ing regulations governing conditions hazardous to life and property from fire or explosion, all of those certain codes, standards, recom- mended practices and manuals contained in and set out in Volumes 1 ough 16, inclusive, of the National Fire Codes published in 1979 by the National Fire Protection Association, and the provi-owns sions of same are hereby incorporated herein and made a part of this article by reference as completely and to the same extent as if set out at length in this article. (Code 1965, § 1703.010; Ord. No. 265, 1, 4 -2 -70; Ord. No. 327, § 1, 7- 20 -72; Ord. No. 410, § 1,1- 27 -77) c. 12 -52. Adoption of Uniform Fire Code. ereby adopted by the city for the pur rescribing regulations rning conditions hazardo a and property from fire or ex p that certain co as the Uniform Fire q g Code, Edition who f, published by the Interna - tional Conference of Buil icials, of which not less than three 3) copies have be ed are filed in the office of the of the c' incorporatedthesameareheredandiM4rFhclasiffutatlength ` herein,and the pr ereof shall be co ing within the limits of the city. (Code 19 .010• x. 708 ti E