Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1983 04-11 City Council Packet
AGENDA -. Maplewood City Council 7: P.'M. , Monday, April 11, 1983 Municipal Admini trati on: Bui lding Meet ng 83 -8 (A) CALL TO ORDER (B ) ROLL CALL APPROVAL O F MINUTES 1 Min 83 -05, February 28, 1983 2 Mi nutes 83 -07, March 28 1983 (D): APPROVAL of AGENDA (E) CONSENT AGENDA Al matters l isted under the Consent Agend are cons to be routine by the Y,.Council d will be enacted by one motion i n the form listed below. There w ill be no separate discussion on these i tems. If discussion is desi red, that item wil be removed from. the Consent. Agenda and will be cons idered se parately. 1 A ccounts Payable 20 Revision of Special Assessment In terest Rate 3. Donation .4 f Home Occupation - Time Extension 5 Maplewood Professional Building 6.0 Transfer to Cl ose. Project 82- (F) PUBLIC HEARINGS C 1 7:00 Li quor License (Ra.lph John Karczewski 20 7 :15 P. U. D.: Hazelwood St (Health Resources} 30 7 :30 Rezoning: Larpenteur Ave. & Parkway Drive ( Votes 40 7:45 Assessment Heari ng ' - Project 80 10 t � f 50 8 :00 Al ley Vacation: Between DeSoto'St and Burr St1 60 8 :15 Rezon ing: 1685 White Bear Ave. ( Kentucky Fried Chickep ( 4:'Vote s) g } (GY ,k AWARD OF BIDS (H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Rezon i nq Maryland Ave. & McKnight Road 20 Code Amendment: N C District 2nd Reading n - 4 Votes ( 9 ) 30 Inventory of Potential R -1 to R -3 Rezonings (I) NEW BUSINESS 11 Plan Modification - Project 81 -12 20 Sterling Street - Holloway to Larpenteur 30 Ide Street - Parking Restriction 40 Reconsideration - Hazelwood Street (J) VISITOR PRESENTATION (M) ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, February 28, 1983 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 83 -5 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7:01 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present Mary Lee Maida, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the aganda as amended 1. Parking Lot 2. Interviews 3. Maintenance Employee 4. Consent Agenda 5. Sewer Billing 6. Attorney 7. Valley Branch Water Shed District Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Council removed Items E -2, 4 and 5 to become J -9, 10 and 11. Councilmember Bastian moved, seconded by Councilmember Maida, Ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda Items 1 and 3 as recommended. 1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part I, Fees, Services, Expenses - Check Register dated February 17, 1983 and February 18, 1983 - $229,362.63; Part II - Payroll dated February 11, 1983 for period ending February 14, 1983 — $53,268.52 in the amount of $282,631.15. 3. Holloway Avenue - Easement Acquisition Approved the agreement with Ramsey County for the acquisition of a temporary slope easement and permanent drainage easement across the property designated Ramsey County Open Space in connection with Holloway Avenue Project 81 -12, with the understanding the property in question will not be assessed for storm sewer. - 1 - 2/28 F. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Preliminary and Final Plat: Carver and Century Avenues 7:00 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Metzen Realty for approval of a Registered Land Survey or a similar preliminary and final plat. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in order and noted the dates of publication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Pellish moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary RLS on the basis that it meets all city ordinances and is consistent with the Land Use Plan. Approval is subject to: 1. Submission of the following easements to the city engineer for his approval: a. Street and utility easement for an additional ten feet along Century Avenue, north of Carver Avenue. b. A 66 -foot wide street and utility easement for Carver Avenue. c. Drainage, storm sewer and ponding easement along the existing creek (in- cluding the remnant to the west) and for the inundation area (see attachment 3 of this report.) 2. Provide the following restrictive convenants running to the city for tracts E, F and G a. No future division of this tract shall be allowed without the construction of interior public streets from Carver Avenue or Century Avenue. b. The property owner must provide an all - weather, five ton, twelve foot wide drive to within 150 feet of the farthest part of a dwelling. The design, fill and material and storm sewer pipe must be approved by the city engineer before construction. 3. Submission of an erosion control plan to the city engineer prior to any con- struction of his approval. 4. Permitting staff to approve the project either on a RLS basis or on the basis of a recorded plat. Commissioner Prew seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Fischer, Pellish, Prew, Whitcomb." d. Mr. Dale Hamilton, Suburban engineering Project Engineer, spoke on behalf of the proposal. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. - 2 - 2/26 g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Councilmember Maida moved approval of the Registered Land Survey or similar plat for the property located at Carver and Century Avenues on the basis that it meets all City ordinances and is consistent with the Land Use Plan. Approval is subject to: 1. Submission of the following easements to the City Engineer for his approval: a. Street and utility easement for an additional ten feet along Century Avenue, north of Carver Avenue. b. A 66 -foot wide street and utility easement for Carver Avenue. c. Drainage, storm sewer and ponding easement along the existing creek (in- cluding the remnant to the west) and for the inumdation area (see attachment 3 of this report.) 2. Provide the following restrictive convenants running to the city for tracts E, F and G a. No future division of this tract shall be allowed without the construction of interior public streets from Carver Avenue or Century Avenue. b. The property owner must provide an all- weather, five ton, twelve foot wide drive to within 150 feet of the farthest part of a dwelling. The design, fill and material and storm sewer pipe must be approved by the city engineer before construction. 3. Submission of an erosion control plan to the city engineer prior to any con - struction of his approval. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. G. AWARD OF BIDS None. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Rezoning: Minnehaha Avenue - Castle Design (4 Votes) a. Manager Evans stated the applicant, Castle Design and Development Co., Inc. is requesting approval of a rezoning from R -1 to R -3 to construct a four unit apartment building. At a previous Council meeting the Council had denied this request. b. Councilmember Anderson presented his reasons for asking for reconsideration. c. Mr. Jerry Erickson, 2670 E. Minnehaha, area resident, voiced his opinion to the proposal. d. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 83 -2 -28 WHEREAS, a rezoning procedure has been initiated by Castle Design and Develop- ment for a zone change from R -1 to R -3 for the following described property: - 3 - 2/28 East 102 feet of Lot 4, Block 1, Farrell's Addition WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning procedure is as follows: 1. That a rezoning procedure has been initiated by Castle Design and Develop- ment, pursuant to chapter 915 of the Maplewood Code; 2. That said rezoning procedure was referred to and reviewed by the Maplewood City Planning Commission on the 3rd day of January, 1983, at which time said Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezone procedure be approved; 3. That the Maplewood City Council held a public hearing to consider the rezoning procedure, notice thereof having been published and mailed pur- suant to law; and 4. That all persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and /or present written statements, and the Council considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA that the above described rezoning be granted on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change will not adversely affect the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. 5. The rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Bastian, Juker and Maida. Nays - Councilmember Anderson. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) 2. Street Vacations: Duluth and Connor 7:15 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposal to vacate a portion of Duluth Street, south of County Road C and Connor Avenue, east of Maplewood Drive. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in order. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: - 4 - 2/28 "Commissioner Pellish moved the PlanningCommission recommend to the City Council approval of the resolutions, vacating Connor Avenue and a portion of Duluth Street, subject to retention of a utility easement over the entire vacated portion of Duluth Street. Approval of each vacation is on the basis that: 1. The rights of way are in excess of the public need. 2. These parcels have been included with abutting property for purposes of assess- ing the cost of.constructing the realigned Duluth Street. 3. The buildable area of adjacent property will be increased. 4. The present alignment of Duluth Street is too close to the intersection of Highway 61 and County Road C to permit an adequate stacking distance. Commissioner Fischer seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Fischer, Pellish, Prew, Whitcomb." d. Mr. William Schonebaum, Pastor of Lakeview Lutheran Church, asked questions regarding the assessments. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 83 -2 -29 WHEREAS, Director of Public Works has initiated these proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following described real property: All of Connor Avenue in Speisers Arbolada Addition, Section 9, Township 29, Range 22 WHEREAS, the procedural history of the vacation application is as follows: 1. That an application for vacation was initiated by the Director of Public Works on the 6th day of January, 1983; 2. That said vacation has been referred to and reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on the 17th day of January, 1983 and referred back to the Maplewood City Council with the recommendation of approval; 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851 a public hearing was held on the 28th day of February, 1983 preceded by two -weeks published and posted notice at which meeting the City Council heard all who expressed a desire to be heard on the matter, considered the Planning Commission recommendation and staff reports. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above described street, public interest in the property will accrue to the following described abutting properties: 1. Lots one through four, Block two, Speisers Arbolada Addition, subject to MN /Dot right of way. - 5 - 2/28 2 Lots seven and eight, Block one, Speisers Arbola.da Addition, subject to MN/ Dot right of way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Maplewood City Council finds that it is in the public interest to grant the above described vacation on the following findings of fact: 1. The rights of way are in excess of the public need. 2. These parcels have been included with abutting property for purposes of assess- ing the cost of constructing and realigned Duluth Street. 3. The buildable area of adjacent property will be increased BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be and hereby is directed to prepare a notice of completion of the proceedings pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851 and shall cause the same to be presented to the County Auditor for entry in his transfer records and that the same shall be thereafter filed with the Ramsey County Recorder, subject to the retention of: State highway right of way for the Highway 61 Service Road and Duluth Street. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. i. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 83 -1 -30 WHEREAS, Director of Public Works has initiated these proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following described real property: Duluth Street north of the easterly extension of the north line of lot four, block one and south of the easterly extension of the north line of lot 1, block l all in Speisers Arbolada Addition, Section 9, Township 29, Range 22 WHEREAS, the procedural history of the vacation application is as follows: That an application for vacation was initiated by Director of Public Works on the 6th day of January, 1983; 2. That said vacationhas been referred to and reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on the 17th day of January, 1983 and referred back to the Maplewood City Council with the recommendation of approval. 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851 a public hearing was held on the 28th day of February, 1983 preceded by two weeks published and posted notice at which meeting the City Council heard all who expressed a desire to be heard on the matter, considered the Planning Commission recommendation and staff reports. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above described street, public interest in the property will accrue to the following described abutting properties: - 6 - 2/28 1. Lots one, two and three, Block one Speisers Arbolada Addition 2. Subject to street, the north 180 feet of the west 135 feet of Lot 11, W.H. Howards Garden Lots. 3. Subject to street and except the north 180 feet of the west 134.5 feet, Lot 11 W.H. Howards Garden Lots. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Maplewood City Council finds that it is in the public interest to grant the above described vacation on the following findings of fact: 1. The rights of way are in excess of the public need. 2. These parcels have been included with abutting property for purposes of assessing the cost of constructing and realigned Duluth Street. 3. The buildable area of adjacent property will be increased. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be and hereby is directed to prepare a notice of completion of the proceedings pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851 and shall cause the same to be presented to the County Auditor for entry in his transfer records and that the same shall be thereafter filed with the Ramsey County Recorder, subject to the retention of: a utility easement over the entire vacated right of way. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 3. Variance: 2259 E. Minnehaha Avenue (Spartan Specialties) 7:30 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Spartan Specialties for approval of a parking variance for seven parking stalls rather than eleven as the code requires. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in order and noted the dates of publication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Board Member Don Moe presented the following Community Design Review Board recommendation: "Board Member Folley moved the Board recommend to the City Council approval of the resolution denying the warehouse addition and the variance of one parking space for Spartan Specialties, based on the findings that: 1. Strict enforcement of the ordinance would not cause undue hardship. The property is presently being put to a reasonable use as allowed by official controls. Furthermore, the need for the variance, in this case, would be created by the landowner and not due to circumstances unique to the property. 2. The variance would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance since: a. The maneuverability of cars on the site would be difficult, if not hazardous. b. The City's parking lot design standards would not be met. - 7 - 2/28 c. There is a potential for a future parking variance if a portion of the proposed addition would later become office space. d. There is no loading /unloading area with proper access. Board Member Hedlund seconded. Ayes - all." d. Mr. Al Hohenwald, Spartan Specialties, the applicant, spoke on behalf of his request. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. The following were heard: Mr. Tom Wynor, partial owner of business next to Spartan Specialties. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the construction plans and to issue the building permit for the Spartan Specia ties warehouse a ition an t e variance for one parking space be tabled until such time as the rig t of way is proposed and the alignment determined. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (continued) 2. R1 to R3 Moratorium - Second Reading a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption ORDINANCE NO. 536 SECTION 36 -487 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM FOR ZONE CHANGES FROM R -1 TO R -3 THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: A Moratorium is established on all zoning changes from R -1 to R -3 in the City of Maplewood. For a period of one year pursuant to M.S.A. 462.355 Subdivision 4. The Moratorium shall not affect any rezone changes from R -1 to R -3 that have been given preliminary approval prior to the effective date of this Ordinance. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage and publication as provided by law. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. c. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: - 8 - 2/28 83 - 1 - 31 WHEREAS, it has become apparent to City Council of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota that a study and review is needed by said City to attempt to insure orderly development of said City and further for the best interest of the health, safety and welfare of the present and future citizens of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, has ordered its planning department on or about the 14th day of February, 1983 at said Planning Department to review and study the comprehensive use plan as it applies to R -1 and R -3 zones. FURTHER, WHEREAS, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, has recommended that a interm moratorium be placed on all proposed zoning changes from R -1 to R -3 in the City of Maplewood during a one year period so as to allow a sensible and comprehensive study to be made by the Planning Department of the City of Maplewood and the Officials of the City of Maplewood in an attempt to arrive at a workable comprehensive plan for the City of Maplewood for the purposes of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: Effective one year from the passage of this resolution all zoning changes from R -1 to R -3 shall cease and desist. 2. Resolution shall not halt, delay, or impeded any zoning changes that are presently under consideration prior to the effective date of this Moratorium. Resolution is pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Annotated 462.355 Subd. 4. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 3. Code Amendment - Multiple Lots - Second Reading a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 537 An Ordinance Regulating the Construction Of A Dwelling On Multiple Lots THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Code of Ordinances of the City of Maplewood is amended to add article X to Chapter 9. ARTICLE X Section 9. Intent. The intent of this article is to regulate the construction of dwellings on multiple lots to prevent: (1) A house being left on a substandard lot by selling off the undeveloped lots. - 9 - 2/28 (2) A house being left without legal frontage if the undeveloped lots between the house and the street are sold as a buildable lot. (3) Substandard, tax - delinquent lots. Section 9 -209. Deeding of construction rights to the city. A building permit shall not be issued for a dwelling on two or more lots until the property owner deeds to the city the right to build a dwelling on any of the said lots that would not be developed. Section 9 -210. Building location. A dwelling on multiple lots shall be located to avoid leaving a substandard lot undeveloped whenever possible. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 4. 1983 Salaries - Non -Union a. Councilmember Anderson moved to table to Item I -4a. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Crestview Drive Water Main a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 83 -2 -32 WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement on Crestview Drive and Hudson Place by construction of watermain and appurtenances; and WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the City Engineer advising this Council that the proposed improvement.on Crestvi..ew Drive and Hudson Place by construction of water - main is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to M. S.A. Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $210,000.00. 3. A public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1380 Frost Avenue on the 14th day of March, 1983, at 7:45 p.m. to consider said improvement. The City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. - 10 - 2/28 NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 1380 Frost Avenue, on March 14, 1983 at 7:45 p.m. to consider the making of an improvement on: Crestview Drive from Hudson Place to cul -de -sac and from McKnight Road, easterly to Sterling Street at Hudson Place, by construction of a municipal water main and appurtenances. The total estimated cost of said improvement is $210,000.00. It is proposed to assess every lot, piece or parcel of land benefited* by said improvement whether abutting thereon or not, based upon benefits received without regard to cash valuation. Persons desiring to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. This Council proposes to proceed under the authority granted by Chapter 429 M.S.A. Dated this 21st day of February, 1983. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ Lucille E. Aurelius, City Clerk City of Maplewood *Benefit as used here, means that the assessed property is enhanced in value for any purpose, not just its present use. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 2. Hazelwood Street Improvements a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to table to the meeting of March 14, 1983 to allow Councilmember Juker to obt further in ormation. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 3. Street Light Policy a. Director of Public Works Ken Haider explained the proposed street lighting policy. b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 83 -2 -33 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood deems it desirable and necessary to establish a policy on street lights; - 11 - 2/28 NOW, THEREFORE, SE IT RESOLVED that the following policy be, and is hereby adopted: Street Lighting Policy _ for the City of Maplewood A. General 1. This policy applies to street lights erected within the public right - of -way for the purpose of lighting public streets. 2. Each proposed site shall be physically inspected by the Director of Public Works to determine the feasibility of light placement and the need for the lights. 3. All lights installed shall be owned and maintained by the electric utility company unless said company cannot furnish said light. 4. The Director of Public Works may cause existing lights to be removed should they be deemed hazardous or unnecessary for traffic safety. B. Placement Each intersection may be lit provided that no intersection light will be placed within 200 feet of another intersection light. 2. No mid -block lights shall be installed within 600 feet of another light on the same street. 3. A street light shall be installed at any location deemed a potential traffic hazard by the Director of Public Works. 4. Arterial and collector streets area special case and lighting needs are to be evaluated on an individual basis taking into account such factors as traffic volume, driveways, intersections, turning movements, etc. C. Type Additional lights in an already lighted area will be of comparable size and type, except that the City may from time to time choose a more efficient type of luminaire. 2. All newly developed areas or large existing unlit areas where underground wiring is present shall be lit with 100 -watt high pressure solium in a custom residential fixture. 3. Arterial and collector roads shall be illuminated as directed by the Director of Public Works using appropriate fixtures and luminaries com- patible with the particular roadway. D. Cost 1. The cost of operation of existing lighting, or individual additions thereof, shall be the responsibility of the City of Maplewood. 2. All construction costs associated with new developments, over and above those borne by the utility company, shall be the responsibility of the developer. - 12 - 2/28 3. All operating costs for a period of five years following installation of lights in new subdivisions shall be paid to the City by the developer. This cost shall be estimated based on the average percentage cost increase for the preceding five years, compounded annually and applied to the cost per light at the time said light is to be installed. Said payment shall be satisfactorily arranged for at the time of execution of the "Developer's Agreement." 4. In existing large unlit areas the costs, as determined for new areas, shall apply. Said costs shall be assessed against the affected properties within said large tracts. Initiation shall be by petition and in accordance with M.S.A. 429. 5. All assessed costs and costs borne by the developer shall be the estimated costs and no part shall be refundable in the event that actual costs prove to be less than the estimated costs. 2 Example: The costs per light is presently $12.55 and the average annual increase for 1978 through 1983 was 13.7%. Therefore, $12.55 x 1.137 = $14.27 per light per month for the first year, and $14.27 x 1.137 = $16.23 per light per month for the second year, etc. equals a total of $93.78 per month for the five years, or a total of $1125.36 to operate one light for the coming five -year period. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson and Bastian. Nays - Councilmembers Juker and Maida. 4. 1983 Agreement - Metro Supervisors Association a. Metro Supervisors Association 1. Manager Evans presented the staff report. 2. Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the 1983 Metro Supervisors Assoc- iation Contract with the followinq c anoes in their contract retroactive 1. A $117 a month across the board increase. 2. A $20 per month increase in hospitalization costs. Approved a budget transfer from the Contingency Fund to cover the costs. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. b. Non -Union Employees Manager Evans presented the staff report. 2. Mayor Greavu approvaithe 1983 wage increases for the non -union employees retroactive to January , a. $117.00 per month for the Director of Public Safety, Director of Public Works, Finance Director, Director of Community Services, City Clerk, Director of Community Development, Deputy Police Chief, Lieutenant, Fire Marshal and Deputy Fire Marshal. b. $95.00 per month - Manager's Secretary. - 13 - 2/28 c. $300.00 per year - Athletic Coordinator. d. $200.00 per year - Civil Defense Director. e. $125.00 per year - Assistant Civil Defense Director. f. $20.00 per month increase in hospitalization costs. A pproved a budget transfer from the contingency fund to cover the costs Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson and Juker. Nays - Councilmembers Bastian and Maida. 5. Battle Creek Regional Park. a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to appoint Mayor Greavu to represent the City of Maplewood on an interview committee to select a architect candidates or t e n,,n nmm.n4 wp R.f+l. r,n Ron,nna �n Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 6. Joint Powers Agreement for Watershed Management Agreement a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mayor Greavu i ntroduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 83 -2 -34 WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 1982, Section 473.875 to 473.883 were devised and adopted to preserve the use natural water storage and retention systems to dispose of stormwater runoff; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 1982, Section 473.878 requires that watershed management planning be conducted for all areas within the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 1982, Section 473.877, Subd. 2 requires that before planning can commence for any specific area, a map delineating watershed boundaries shall be submitted to the Water Resources Board for review and comment; and WHEREAS, the Department of Natural Resources is currently making revisions to the watershed boundaries map for the Water Resources Board; and WHEREAS, staff or consultant engineer representatives from the City of Newport, the City of St. Paul Park and the City of Maplewood have worked together in delin- eating watershed boundaries and a Joint Powers Agreement for the establishment of a St. Paul Park - Maplewood- Newport Watershed Management Organization;, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thatthe agreement represents the City of Maplewood's position on watershed boundaries for southern Maplewood; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED athat the agreement be forwarded to the appropriate -state agencies. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. - 14 - 2/28 7. Human Relations Commission a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Council established April 6 at the Priory for a joint meeting with the Human Relations Commission. 8. Maplewood Fire Fighters Relief Association a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Council discussed the item and tabled it to the meeting of March 14, 1983. 9. Holloway Avenue - Easement Acquisition a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson moved authorization of the issuance of a check in the amount of $7,306.00 to the Maplewood ort St. Paul School District or permanent and temoorary easements in the construction of 0 owav Avenue Improveme OI Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 10. Final Plat - Lakeridge Park a. Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the Lakeridge Park Final Plat subject to changing lot one, block four to Out of Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 11. Carryover of 1982 Appropriations to 1983 a. Councilmember Juker moved authorization for reductions in the 1982 Budget and increases in the 1983 Budget for the carry over requests: Amount Account Code 1) $18,300 01- 4640 -12 Function Emergency Preparedness Accounting Paramedic Services Paramedic Services Purpose 2) 2,020 01- 4630 -22 3) 390 01- 4600 -43 4) 28,700 01- 4640 -43 $49,410 TOTAL Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. To purchase a radio repeater system To partially finance the purchase of a computer ter- minal to replace a leased terminal Undesignated capital outlay ( "Paramedic Gift Fund ") East Metro E.M.S. Communicat- ion System Ayes - all. - 15 - 2/28 J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Parking Lot a. Councilmember Juker moved that the parking lot west of City Hall be left open for the public and all City employees wi par across the street in the Municipal Par ing Lot. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 2. Interviews a. Councilmember Juker stated three persons are coming in on Tuesday, March 8, 1983 for Commission Member Candidates at 6:30 P.M. 3. Maintenance Employee a. Councilmember Juker questioned if this employee was hired before Council approved the hiring. b. No action taken. 4. Consent Agenda a. Councilmember Anderson stated he felt there were too many items on the Consent Agenda. 5. Sewer Billing a. Councilmember Anderson requested staff to investigate using envelopes for the sewer billing. 6. Attorney a. Mayor Greavu questioned why another attorney was hired for a law suit. b. Manager Evans stated it was because City Attorney Lais was a witness in the case. 7. Valley Branch Water Shed District a. Mayor Greavu questioned who was representing Maplewood in the Valley Branch Water Shed District Board. b. Manager Evans stated no one at this time. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS None. ADJOURNMENT City Clerk - 16 - 2/28 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, March 28, 1983. Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 83-7 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present MaryLee Maida, Councilmember Absent C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilmember Juker moved to a 22rove the Minutes of Meeting No. 83 -04, February 14, 1983, as corrected Page 1 - Item B - Anderson Page 6 - Item F, 1 h - Maplewood Page 9 - Item I, 2 - selection Page 11 - Item I, 5, 2 - enumerated Page 11 - Item I, 8 - fuel Page 11 - Item I, 6a - established Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Juker Mayor Greavu abstained. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended 1. Reconsideration 2. Commission's Application 3. Senior Citizen 4. Hazardous Materials 50 Holloway Letter 6. Street Standards 7. Bids Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Council removed Items E - 4 & 5 from the consent agenda to become Item I, 9 & 100 Councilmember Bastian moved, seconded by Councilmember Juker, Ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda, Items 1, 2, 3 and 6 as recommended 3/28 1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part I, Fees, Services and Expenses, Check register dated March 15 and 16, 1983 - $494,070.25: Part II, Payroll, Check register dated March 25, 1983, for pay period ending March 18, 1983 - $54,675.37) in the amount of $548,745.620 2. Frost Avenue - Right of Way Authorized the payment of $656.25 to Cross Lutheran Church for the purchase of right of way required for construction of Frost Avenue Project No. 82 -9. 3. Final Payment - Cope Avenue Resolution No. 83 - 3 - RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND ORDERING FINAL PAYMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract approved by the City of May 28, 1980, C & H Contracting, Inc. has satisfactorily completed Maplewood Improvement Project 79 -1 in accordance with said contract. WHEREAS, American Druggist Insurance Company, the contractor's bonding agent has agreed to hold the City harmless from claims arising from the said contract. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, the work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and.approved, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk and Mayor are hereby directed to issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract, taking the bonding agent's receipt in full. 6. District Bike Rodeo Authorized the use of the Municipal Parking Lot west of the Gladstone House for the District 622 Bike Rodeo on May 7, 1983 from noon to 3:00 P.M. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Street Vacation - Harris a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Mark Marty to vacate Harris Avenue from Prosperity Road to a point 170 feet west of Prosperity Road. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in order and noted the dates of publication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. C. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the resolution vacating Harris Avenue, 1380 feet west of Prosperity Road, subject to: 2 - 3/28 1. Retaining an easement over the entire right -of -way for storm sewer, utilities and the Williams Brothers pipeline. 2. Providing a storm water holding area easement over the westerly 40 feet of the south 75 feet and the westerly 60 feet over the remainder of the applicant's property before the vacation is recorded. Commissioner Hejny seconded Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Ellefson, Fischer, Hejny, Pellish, Prew, Whitcomb. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. The applicant, Mr. Mark Marty, 2021 Prosperity Road spoke on behalf of his request. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 83 - 3 - WHEREAS, Mark Marty initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following- described real property: That portion of the Harris Avenue right -of -way described as follows: 130 feet west of the northeasterly extension of the southeasterly lot line of lot one, F.D. Nelson's Homesites in Section 15- 29 -22, as measured along the south right -of -way line. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows.: 1. This vacation was initiated by Mark Marty on February 11, 1983; 2. A majority of the owners of property abutting said street have signed a petition for this vacation; 3. This vacation was reviewed by the Planning Commission on March 7, 1983. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that this vacation be approved; 4. The City Council held a public hearing on March 28, 1983, to consider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also con- sidered reports and recommendations of the city staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above- described street, public interest in the property will accrue to the following - described abutting properties: Lot 1, F. D. Nelsons Homesites 3 - 3/28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood City Council that it is in the public interest to grant the above- described vacation on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. There is no need for a public street over: this right -of -way. 2. Maintaining the right -of -way unnecessarily restricts development of the property to the north. This vacation is subject to the retention of an easement for storm sewer, utilities and the Williams Brothers Pipeline. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. G. AWARD OF BIDS .. Manager Evans presented the staff report. Ayes - all. :2. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 83 - 3 - WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, has deemed it necessary and expedient, and WHEREAS, following advertisement, sealed bids were received on March 24, 1983. . NOW BE IT RESOLVED that the sale of four Public Safety vehicles to the highest qualified bidder be, and is hereby, approved as follows: 1981 Damaged Ford LTD 1981 Undamaged Ford LTD 1979 Buick LeSabre 1981 Chevrolet Station wagon Seconded by Mayor Greavu. $ 810.81 1,756.99 790.79 1,777.77 H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Rezoning. Century Avenue - Ivy Tracks a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. Ayes - all. b. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: Commissioner Pellish moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the resolution rezoning this area from M -2 to F and R -3 consistent with the staff report dated February 14, 19830 Commissioner Whitcomb seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Fischer, Hejny, Pellish, Sletten, Whitcomb. c. Councilmember Juker moved to reconsider the F (Farm) zone area and to initiate a R -2 zone for the other area and refer this to the Planning Commis- sion. 4 - 3/28 Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) 2. Plan Amendment - Rezoning 1300 McKnight Rd. 7:15 P.M. a. Plan Amendment 1. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a proposed plan amendment for 1300 McKnight Road from RM Residen- tial Medium Density to BW - Business Warehouse. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in order and noted the dates of publication. 2. Manager Evans presented the staff report. 3. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recom- mendation: Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the resolution approving a plan amendment from RM, Residential Medium Density to BW, Business Warehouse for Bulk Service Corporation's property abutting the Beaver Lake Estates Mobile Home Park. Also, the Commission recommends the acreage chart on page 19 -3 of the Land Use Plan be amended to reflect the proposed 9.4 acreage change from RM, Residential Medium Density to BW, Business Warehouse use for the Beaver Lake Neighborhood. Commissioner Hejny seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Ellefson, Fischer, Hejny, Pellish, Prew, Whitcomb. 4. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. 5. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. 6. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. 7. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 83 - 3 - WHEREAS, a proceedings for the amendment of the Maplewood Comprehensive Munici- pal Plan entitled "Plan for Maplewood" has been initiated by the City of Maplewood for a change of Planned Use from RM - Residential Medium Density to BW - Business Warehouse for the following generally described area: That part of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 24, Township 29, Range 24, except the Northwesterly 95 feet part South- easterly of Omaha Railway main track center line (part of property tax parcel 57- 02410- 030 -50) that lies South of the following described line, beginning 620 feet North of the Southeast corner of said quarter- quarter, thence Southwesterly to the Southwest corner of said quarter - quarter. 5 - 3/28 WHEREAS, the procedural history of the proposed amendment is as follows: 1. The City of Maplewood has a Comprehensive Municipal Plan entitled "Plan for Maplewood" adopted pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 670, Laws 1965 (the Municipal Planning Act, Minne- sota Statutes Annotated, Sections 462.351 to 462.364 thereof); 2. Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.355, Subdivision 2 and 3 thereof, provide for amendment of the Comprehensive Municipal Plan or of any section thereof; 3. An amendment of the Comprehensive Municipal Plan has been proposed by the City of Maplewood and referred to the Maplewood Planning Commission, which held a public hearing on the 7th day of March, 1983, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, 462.355, Subdivision 2 thereof, notice by mail and publication having been given, heard all who wished to be heard, considered all written and staff reports and analysis. WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Planning Commission, having considered the testimony of those present, all written submissions to it and staff reports, recommended approval of the amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. An RM designation gives the Beaver Lake Estates management unfair leverage in negotiating the purchase of the property. 2. Land use compatibility can be accomplished if developed for warehouse or mobile homes. 3. The impact on the Beaver Lake Neighborhood would be of minor signifi- cance. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. b. Rezoning 1. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for public hearing regarding the rezoning of 1300 McKnight Road. from M -2 Heavy Manufacturing to M -1 Light Manufacturing. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in order and noted the dates of publication. 2. Manager Evans presented the staff report. 3. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recom- mendation: Commissioner Whitcomb moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the resolution rezoning the property at 1300 McKnight Road from M -2 to M -1. Commissioner Barrett seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Ellefson, Fischer, Hejny, Pellish, Prew, Whitcomb, 6 3/28 4. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. 5. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. 6. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. 7. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 83 - 3 - WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council initiated the following rezoning: Except the Northwesterly 95 feet part Southeasterly of the Omaha Railway main track center line of the Northeast 1/4 of the South- west 1/4 also except the 8 -1/2 foot strip Southerly of the ,center line of I.C.C. track 114 and except the West 66 feet and except the Northwesterly 95 feet parallel with said main track center line part of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 North- westerly of a line parallel with and 450 feet South from (measured on the west line of the section) original 100 feet Omaha Railway right -of -way (subject to roads and easements) in Section 24, Town- ship 29, Range 22 WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the Maplewood City Council, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on March 7, 1983. The Planning Commission reocmmended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on the 28th day of March, 1983, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood and that the use of the property adjacent to the area i.ncluded.in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. am 7 - 3/28 Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 3. Plan Amendment - McKnight and Maryland - 7:15 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a proposed amendment to the Land Use Plan to change the property at the northwest intersection of Maryland Avenue and the McKnight Road realign- ment from SC - Service Commercial to RM - Residential Medium Density. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in order and noted the dates of publication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommenda- tion: Commissioner Pellish moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the resolution amending the Land Use Plan from RM, Residential Medium Density to LSC, Limited Service Commercial for the property lying northeast of the intersection of Maryland Avenue and the McKnight Road realignment. Also the Commission recommends ap- proval of the resolution amending the Land Use Plan designation from SC, Service Commercial to RM, Residential Medium Density, for the property lying northwest of the intersection of Maryland Avenue and the McKnight Road realignment. Commissioner Ellefson seconded. Some of the Commissioners said they could not vote in favor of this proposed amendment because the exact location of the McKnight Road realignment not decided on. Voting on the motion: Ayes - Commissioners Barrett, Ellefson, Pellish and Prew Nays - Commissioners Whitcomb and Hejny Abstained - Commissioner. Fischer Motion carries 4 -2 -1 d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Counci 1 member Bastian i ntroduced the following resolution and moved its adoption • 8 - 3/28 83 -3- WHEREAS, a proceedings for the amendment of the Maplewood Comprehensive Municipal Plan entitled "Plan for Maplewood" has been initiated by the City of Maplewood for a change of Planned Use from SC, Service Commercial to RM, Residential Medium Density for the following generally - described area: The portion of the following- described property lying west of the center- line of the McKnight Road Realignment: The east 365 feet of the south 503- 11 /12 feet of the SW of the SW4 , subject to Maryland Avenue in Section 24, Township 29, Range 22. WHEREAS, the procedural history of the proposed amendment is as follows. 1. The City of Maplewood has a Comprehensive Municipal Plan entitled "Plan for Maplewood" adopted pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statules, Chapter 670, Laws 1965(the Municipal Planning Act, Minnesota Statutes Annotated, Sections 462.341 to 462.364 thereof); 2. Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.355, Subdivision 2 and 3 thereof, provide for amendment of the Comprehensive Municipal Plan or of any section thereof; 3. An amendment of the Comprehensive Municipal Plan has been proposed by the City of Maplewood and referred to the Maplewood Planning Commission, which held a public hearing * the 7th day of March, 1983, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, 462.355, Subdivision 2 thereof, notice by mail and publication having been given, heard all who wished to be heard, considered all written and staff reports and analysis. WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Planninr Commission, having considered the testimony of those present, all written. submissions to it and staff reports, recommended approval of the proposed amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED 3Y THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described Plan Amendmeil � be approved on the basis of the following fi ndi ns of fact: 1. The Service Commercial designation is too intensive for this location. 2. The preferred site for neighborhood commercial shopping is on. the east side of the McKnight Road Realignment. 3. There is no justification for designating both sides of the road for commercial use at this time. 4. The Resid enti.al Medium Density designation would be consistent with .adjoining planned land uses. 5. The change would not have an adverse affect on the land use plan. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 4. Code Amendment - N C D istrict - 2nd Reading 7:30 P.M. - 9 - 3/28 a. Mayor Greavu moved to table this item until such time as there is a full counci Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes -all. 5. Rezonings: Maryland and McKnight- 7:30 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the propcsed rezoning of 68 acres at the corner of McKnight Road and Maryland Avenue from M -2 Heavy Manufacturing to R -3 Multiple Dwelling, R -2 Double Dwelling and NC Neighborhood Commercial. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in order and noted the dates of publication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Chairman Axdahl presented the following Planning .Commission recommend - ati on: Commissioner Prew moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the area under consideration be rezoned as follows: 1. Area 1, which would refer to all properties east of the proposed new alignment of McKnight Road, except for what is now called Area 2, would be rezoned to R -3 Multiple Dwelling. 2. Area 2, which would consist of the piece of property at the intersection between the mobile home park and proposed McKnight alignment as shown on the staff memorandum, would be NC, Neighborhood' Commercial. 3. Area 3, which would be all remaining parts, which would be all parts west of the proposed McKnight Road al i gnment would be rezoned as R -1 , Residential District (Single Dwelling ) . Commissioner Whitcomb seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, E1 l efson, Fischer, Hejny, Pel l i sh, Prew, Whitcomb d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents and opponents. The following persons voiced their opinions: Mr. Tony Oswald Mr. Phil Oswald Mrs. Paul Edmiston, 2345 E. Maryland e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. f. Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the rezoning as stated in the Planning Commission report. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Motion defeated- 4/5 votes required. H. Unfinished Busine Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, and Bastian. Nay - Counci 1 member Juker 2. Code Amendment: Planning Commission Terms. - 10 - 3/28 a. Manager Evans stated the proposed amendment would allow a Planning Commission member with an expired term to serve until a new appoint- ment or re- appointment is made. b. Counciimember Bastian moved to approve the amendment to the ordinances as stated by the Manager Seconded by Mayor Greavu . Ayes - all 0 c. Mayor Greavu . introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption ORDINANCE N0, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 25 OF THE MAPLEWOOD CODE OF ORDINANCES RELATING TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 25 -19 (b) is hereby amended as follows (additions underlined): Sec. 25 -19. (b) (b) The members of the first planning commission under the 1970 amendment of this section shall consist of: three(3) members appointed for three(3) years; four(4) members appointed for two(2) years; and four(4) members appointed for one year. The unexpired portion of the year in which the appointments are made shall be considered as one year. All terms shall exp.i re on December thirty -first of the year in which the appointment terminates. A commissioner with an expired term, however, may serve until a new appoi ntment or reappoi ntment i s .made . s the terms expire, a appointments thereafter - -s-ha a for a terms o three (3) years.. (Code 1965, § 202.020; Ord. No. 263, § 3, 4 -2 -70) Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after its passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Council this 28th day of March, 1983. Seconded by Council member Bastian. Ayes - all I. New Business le Final Plat - Carsaroves Final Addition. a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved approval of the C arsgroves First Addition final plat subject o the folio wing 1 The receipt of an irrevocable 1 etter of credit for completion of required public improvements prior to the City signing of the final plat, - 11 - 3/28 2. Submission of temporary roadway easements for the north and south side of Demont Avenue for a temporary cul-de-sac at the east boundary site. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes- all. 2. Final Plat - Carsgroves Second Addition. a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mayor Greavu moved approval of Carsgrove' s Second Addition final. lat rovidin a con itions ha bee wi Seconded by Councilmember Anderson, Ayes - all, 3. Inventory of Potential R -1 to R -2 a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mayor Greavu moved to table until a full council is in attendance. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes- all. 4. H.R.A. - Annual Report a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mayor Greavu moved to accept the 1982 H.R.A. Annual Report. Seconded by Couci l member Bastian. Ayes - all. c. Establishing a meeting date for the Council and H .R.A. was referred back to H . R . A. for further review of possible dates. 5. Hiring - Temporary Personnel- Engineering a. Manager Evans presented the staff.report. b. Councilmember Bastian roved authorization to interview and hire two(2) tem orary people as survey crew neiperS Tor tnis year -upcoming construction projects. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all 6, Paramedic Bill - Cancellation a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mayor Greavu moved cancellation of paramedic ambulance service char es for Gays ei ser i n a amount, Of . . Seconded by Councilmember Anderson, Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Council- members Anderson and Bastian. Nay - Councilmember Juker 7. Request for No Parking Signs - Ide Street - 12 - 3/28 a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. 4 b. Mr. Sheldon Knutson, 1942 Ide Street, spoke on behalf of his request for no parking. c. Councilmember Bastian moved to establish no parking on the east side of Ide Street from ros venue to e ea -en e ween e ours of P.M. to 6:00 A.M. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 8. Industrial Revenue Fee a. Mayor Greavu moved to. table this item for further information. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. 9. Street Lights Ayes - all. a. Councilmember Bastian moved to authorize the. Mayor and Clerk to sign an agreement reques Ong ort ern tates owe_ to connect mercury street 11 ghts to high pressure sodium lights as the mercury a asts f ai 1 . - wi th no conversion costs o ap ewood. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson and Bastian Nay - Councilmember Juker 10. Budget Transfer - Supplementary Codification a. Councilmember Bastian moved to authorize staff to contact Municipal Code Corpora ion and reques upp emen o. TTo the Eunicipa o e an a so approve a budget transfer of . , from the on lgency Fu Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. J. Visitor Presentation - None K. C-Ouncll-7 1. Reconsideration a. Councilmember Juker moved reconsideration of the Hazelwood Street improvement. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 2. Commission Application a. Councilmember Juker presented an application form for commission applicants and moved to adopt the same as the offi cal form*:. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. • 3. Senior Citizen a. Councilmember Anderson roved to request staff .to review various Senior Citizen or finances pertaining to re uc ion in sewer ra es. am 13 - 3/28 Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 4. Hazardous Material s a. Councilmember Bastian informed the Council of several bills that are pending concerning employees use of hazardous materials. 5. Letter - Holloway Street a. Councilmember Bastian referred the letter from the-resident regarding Holloway Street to.staff for review. 6. Street Standards a. Councilmember Bastian commented on the letter from Richard Braun stating there will be ,a meeting regarding establishing street A, standards on April 8, 1983. This is an opportunity for the Council to express their views. The meeting will be held at the Transportation Building, b. Councilmember Anderson will attend. L. Admi ni strati ve ' Presenta on 1. Project 80 -10 Award a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mayor Greavu moved to authorize the payment of award of dama es for ac ui si ti on of right entry and uti 1 i tales for Pro 'ect 80 -10 in the amount of ,5,800.00 to James M. & Gloria J. Matson Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. Meeting Adjourned - 8:53 P. M. City Clerk - 14 - 3/28 Page 1 April 11,1983- Accounts Faya 1983 C 1 TY OF MA PLEWO CD CHECK REG? STr-R c I AMOUNT _.__.VENDGa ITLEM D ! TIOiN 07410 03/30/83 59904 EOCIE WEESTERS PRCG SUPPLIES 599.04 t 07442 03/30183 4000 ANNALS SUES MEMBERSh:P 40.00 C74502 03/30/'P3 _ _ - - -. _ 2.669 : 00 __ -. -- Mh STATE TPLA. MCTCR VE H LIC PBL 074502 03/30/P3 289.00 Mk ST ATE TREAS 0RIViKJ LIC SQL 2 9 958 *00 074504 01/30193 -- _- _- - - - -.__ 553.70 MN STATE TREAS SURTAX PBL 074504 03/30/ ' 11 907- Mai STATE- TREAS SURTA X PBL 542.63 # 074958 03/ 40.00 _ WARcNING LITES TRAVEL TRA1NI'-tlb 40.00 • 975502 03/3(1/%t3 294 39.75 PNI STATE TREAS MOTOR VEH LIC PBl 075502 03 /30/93 126 MN STATE TREAS DRIVERS LIC PBL 2 ,P615.75 076232 03/3U/83 1,000000 EMFLY BENEFIT CLRS OE NTAL CLAIMS 19000900..* __ - -- 076502 0.3/30/ 1, 639.50 PK STATE TREAS MOOR VEH LIC ?E 075502 03/30/ 90000 Ph STATE TREAS DRcIVEKS LIC FPL 1 •729 *5t? #t4 #tt 076742 03/30I93 67.50 CLERK OF DISTR CT CNTY DRIVERS LIC 67.50 # 077441 03/30/R3 462.00 MAFLELEAF OFFIC PROGRAM SUPPLIES 462.00 # 077502 iJ3 /30 /93 2 578.50 rN STATE TREAS MCT3Rc V H LIC P b y a, CRQ5n2 03/30f 3 718.75 MN STATE TREAS 05RO502 0 3/30/R3 6 0.00 MN STATE TREAS Page 2 03/30/R3 .. _ 344.00 . STATE TREAS 1983 C!TY OF MAFt :1v0CD _ 298.00 -MN MN STATE TREAS CHECK REGISTT 4, 420.75 • AM)UNT _ -.- - ._ _ VENDOR ITEM DESC 077502 03/?0 /8,3 246.00 MN STATE TREAS DRIVERS LIC F3 L - -- -- - - . _ _ 2 E24.50 077557 C77557 03/30/ 0.3/30/83 4 536.4-7 39969954 IJN STATE TREQS PERA DEDUCT ( 0.3/30/83 23.06 MN MN STATE ST TREAS TREAS PERA PERA PERA DEDUCT DEDUCT 1377557 (77557 X13/30/83 03/30/83 44.74 PN STATE TREAS PERA FE RA LEDUC T C77557 03/30/13 23997 11795 NN STATE . TREAS PERA PERA DEDUCT ( X117557 _. 03/30/83 -- - - -- 196.24 V M N. STATE STATE TREAS TREAS PERA PERA P _ PA PERA D= D UC T DEDUCT 077557 077557 03/10!8,3 03/30183 211.89 MN STATE TREAS PERA FERA D£3UCT 077557 03/30/83 _ 38,19 __ -- 52.52 MN STATE TREAS PERA FERA Dtt?JCT 077 -5 -57 03/30 -/_13- 416-73 - MN 00N STATE STATE -- TREAS TR` - AS PERA -- PE.FA PGPA DED T -- C77557 03/30/83 '144.44 -. -- -_- -MN STATE TREAS FERA PERA DEDUCT DEDUCT 077557 C7T557 03/30/83 03/30/83 4, 121.63 Mid STATE TREAS PERA OED C U.,T 077557 03/30/83 376905 315.05 Mh ST ATE TREA S FERA M DED U T 077557 ;03/30/13 _ 214.26 PN MN STATE STATE TREAS TREAS FEFA PERA DEDUCT DEDUCT x'77557 077557 'Ll 3/ 0/F3 03/30/83 18 PN ST ATE TREAS PERA PERA D E DUCT 077557 _ _ 03/30/83 - 14 *1 .50 - - 557.33 �N.. MN ST =TE STATE TREAS TREAS FERA PERA FERA D =DUCT [ 077557 03/30 /9-3 341.70 MN STATE TREAS FERA FERA PERA DEDUCT DEDUCT 077557 1377551 03/30/83 t? 3/30 /83 35.29 MN STATE TREAS PERA PERA DEDUCT 1 n -77557 03/30/ 220.48 80.16 MN ST ATE TREAS FERA P RA DEDUCT L 03/!0/13 138966 MN PN STATE STATE TREAS TREAS FERA DEDUCT # 077557 03/30/83 - - -._. _ 92.96 -- MN STATE TREAS FEFA 'FERA DEDUCT DEDUCT 077 55 7 077557 03/ 03/30/83 64 Ph STATE TREAS PERA DEDISCT 077557 U3/30/R3 49 80,56 N STATE TREAS PERA DEDUCT f n?7755 7 03/30/R3 19,65 MN P%I STATE STATE TREAS TREAS PERA PERA FERA DEDUCT O =D C77557 077557 03/30/8,3 -- -_ -. n3/30/R3 -_ _ 425.41 _ - - MN STATE TREAS PERA rEFA DEDUCT # 122.79 MN STATE TREAS PERA Pc RA DEDUCT 1To361.49 0TT 5 l 73/30113 313,29 MN STATE TREAS 313.29 077947 03/30/8,3 285.45 WALS EOCY SHOP 2 8 5.4 5 * _ PERA DEDUCT VEH MAINT MCTOR VEH LIC P! ONR LIC PBL DRIVERS LIC POL DRIVERS LIC F8L CRQ5n2 03/30f 3 718.75 MN STATE TREAS 05RO502 0 3/30/R3 6 0.00 MN STATE TREAS 080502* 03/30/R3 .. _ 344.00 . STATE TREAS 039502 03/30/333 _ 298.00 -MN MN STATE TREAS 4, 420.75 • PERA DEDUCT VEH MAINT MCTOR VEH LIC P! ONR LIC PBL DRIVERS LIC POL DRIVERS LIC F8L 0 Pa g e, 1983 CITY OF MA FLE6I CD CHECK REGISTER CHECK DATE' - - - _ AMOUNT -- - - ------- - - - - -- VENOOR - ITEM DESCR IP TI Off ME 510 03/30/83 15000 PN TORO TRAVEL TRAINING t *ttt 1380309 0 3/30/Q3 6.35 RON MERRILL REFUND 6.35 t C81502 03/30/33 6, 345.40 P% STATE TREAS MOTOR VEH LIC PBL 6 * 345,40 092502 03/30/%R3 4,919.80 MN STATE TR_AS MOTOR VEH LIC PBL 082502 03/30/53 201 .50 P14 STATE TREAS DRIVERS LIC PBL 5,121.50 CR3466 03/30 /�3 8000 METRO AREA MGMT TRAVEL TRAINING 8.00 � ii'Rtfi 043502 tl3 /30/R 3 3,060 MN STATE TREAS MOTOR VEH LIC PBL 083502 03/30/83 163.00 MA STATE TRE:Ac DRIVERS LIC PBL 39223.75 i #+t lf� 083742 03/30/93 81 - *00 - CLERIC OF DISTR CT CPO'TY DRI V E RS LIC ' 81.00 C845P2 03/30/ 39093925 MIS STATE TREAS _ IHCTOR VEH LIC PBL OF4502 03/3C/83 377.0.0 PN STATE TREAS DRIVERS LIC PSL 3, 470.25 08101 5 _ 03/30/183 - 31705 AFSCME 2725 LAICf DUES 087015 03/30183 5.32 AFECME 2725 UNION DUES 323.27 087153 .- 0 3/30/83 - _. _ 12 926,50 * MPLY _ - - P/R D :DUCT 12 , i *t�tf a page 4 1483 r: TY oir MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGTSTE'R CHEC-K n09 DATE _ -.- �NOU+vT _ _ -- VE NL'G _ _ ITEM DESCRI 087330 03/30133 559.23 ICMA RETTREMNT DEF=RR CJMP 087330 03/30/83 117.93 ICMA RETIciEMNT — OE FERR COMP 687.) 6 �► (187373 03/30/83 145.00 ROSEMARY KANE P.R DEDUCT 145.00 { C87453 03/30/93 76 MAPLE 60 STATE BNK FWT DEDUCT 1605203 t 087470 03/30/33 24,00 METRD SUPERVSCRY UNION DUES 24.00 G875C2 Q3 /?DI A 3 5 PA ST TR".4S MCTOR VEH LTC 3 8L 087502 03/?C/13 217.00 PN STATE TREAS DRIVERS LIC FBL 6912005 Ott* *t GR7520 33/ ?OI33 276.90 _ Pk BEI►EFIT "Sze, iNSURANCr 276. C3754n 03/30/1.3 310900 MN MUTUAL LIFE P/R DEDUCTION 310.0 C87556 03/30/93 300.00 PN STATE RE IRMhT DEFERR COMP 300.00 087559 03/30/ 7, Mf STATE TREAS S/S S/S PBL t`97559 93/30/93 711588.59 MN STATE TREAS S/S S/S PBL 15077.18 t fftt ** t W710 03/30/83 750900 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 750.00 G87970 03/30/83 7 MN ST COMM REVENUE SWT DEDUCT 08A 232 03/30/83 110000000 page 5 1933 CITY OF MAFLEWIC3 CHECK R EGISTER CHECK Na. DATE -- _ -- - - -_ -- AMOUNT ----- .___.- - VcNGC'I.._ ITEM 0ESC. .RIPT!ON - 7, � . � C. St�2 03/30/83 5, 478 25 - . PN STATE TREAS MCTOR VEH LIC PSL 087973 03/30/83 _ - - -_- - -- 154.7 ► __- _ - -._ -- .MSC CEP_T R _ _ _ SWT PBL OR IVERS LIC PBL 154.74 5, 760.25 OR7 ^26 03/30/83 7.50 JOANN= MCPHERSGN /R DEDUCT 03/31 /R3 1 7..5.0 FRCJ 80 -10 08A 232 03/30/83 110000000 EMPLY BENEFIT CLMS DENTAL CLAIMS 1, 000.00 *mot: f t � . � C. St�2 03/30/83 5, 478 25 - . PN STATE TREAS MCTOR VEH LIC PSL C88 502 03/30/83 282.00 Mf1 STATE TREAS OR IVERS LIC PBL 5, 760.25 C89394 03/31 /R3 1 LAIS EANNIGAA FRCJ 80 -10 1,t500.00 # f 089592 03/31/13 4, 714oRO WN STATE TRE MCTOR VEH LIC PBL 089 502 03/31/33 153900 KH STATE TREAS CRIVERS LIC FBL 4, 867.30 + f 089C'27 03/31/ 91 .Oa VEKT IA N iN{N ADULT TRIP 91.00 ! _ C89^ 0 3/31 /R3 6.50 COMO C CNSERVAT CRY ACULT TR jP Op9029 03/31/13 656.25 CRCSS LLTHERAN LAND AQUIST 656.15 089 ^30 03/31/3 8.50 516 AR EA VO TECH TRAVEL TRAINING 089m-30 _ D 3 /31 /R3 -.._ - __8.50 _ -_ - -- - 9,16 A R EA VO TECH _- _ TRAVEL TR A INING 17.00 t 089031 03./31/33 - -8900 7PECDQRE ALEREC +T REFUND 8.01) r 090152 03/31/83 .94 JUCT CHLEBECK CFFICE SUPPLIES pa 6 1983 CITY OF MAPLEWOCO - CHECK RE GTSTTR ITEM DESCRIPTION 090152 03/ 31 /83 300 -LEBECK 4UCY P Cl - TRAVEL TRAINING 090152 0.3/31/83 4025 JUCY P Cl-LEBECK TRAVEL TRAINING 090152 03/31/13 2 .R0 JUCY M C14LEBECK TRAVEL TRAINING 090152 03/31/R3 4s00 JUCY M C1-LEBECK TRAVEL TRAINING 09050 03/31 /13 4.841 MN ST ATE TREAS VC70R VEH LIC POL 090502 03/31/83 110*00 rn STATE TREAS DRTVERS LIC PBL C90742 0 3 / . 31 / 78.00 0 CLERK OF DISTR CN-TY DRI VERS, LIC F 78,03 I a 10 til 9 03/?0/83 26 o23 ACFC-wvTNNAE'SCTA INC CFFICE SUPPLIES 101009 03/30/93 21975- ACFO- MTNNr_S0TA INC SUPPLIES VEH 101009 03/70/13 21.75 ACRD-JWINhE.3CTA INC SUPPLIES VEH 101 or 03 /3Q /Q3 3 5 o 15 - up - . . - -. S'_FPLTES IL VEIJ #_ 1070 n,9 03/!0183 35o15 ACFC-MTNNZS0TA INC SUFPLIIES VEH 101009 03/ 24*75 ACRD - MINNESOTA INC SUPPLIES VEH 101009 03/30/9-3 24.75- ACRO-!IlNhE:SCTA INC SUPPLIES VEH 26.23 101052 19 3/30 /R3 21 .75 ARNALS ALTO SERVICE SLPPL TES VEH 101052 03/30/83 21 ,75 A R A AL S ALTO SERVICE S UPPLI ES V EH 6. H 101052 03/30/R3 21 .75- ARNAL S. AUTO SEER VICE SUPP L I ES VEH 101052 03/30/F3 3505 AR NALS AUTO SERVICE. SUPPLIES VEH 101052 f) 3 /30 /'43 3505 ALT C S 7 R VT C E %t.LPPLTES VEM 101052 03/30/,Q3 3505- E A AUTO SERVICE SUPPLIES VEH 101052 03/30/83 24.75 - b. A RAAL S. AUTO S I C SU PPLIES %0 V- 1 H 101052 03/30183 2497.5. A RNAL S ALTO SERVICE SLFPLIES VEH 101052 03/30/93 24975 ARKAL S AUTO S E'R VI CE' SUPPLIES VEH 101052 03/30 110005- A AUTO S ER V I C E SUPPLIES VEH 101052 03/3G/g3.- 11090.5 _ _ A R NA LS ALTC SERVICE SLFPLIES VEH 101052 03/30/93 110*05 A R h AL I ALTO SERVICE SUFPL41ES VEH 101052 93/30/83 13* 30 %_ AR�ALIQ ALTO SERVICE. SLPPLIES, VEM 101052 03 /30 / 8 3 1300 A R h A L '%c. ALTO SERVICE SUPPLIES VEH 101052 03/ / 8 3 52.25- A R N A L S. AUTO S "r- R V I CE SUPPLIES VEH 101052 03 /30/9-3 52025 E ARNALS AUTO SE RVICE SUPPLIES VEH 101052 ARMS ALIT 0 SERVICE SLFPLIES VEH 101052 03/303 ' 0k ' 4'x.75 AR NAL S AUTO SERVICE SUPPLIES VEH 1010 03/30/83 41075 AR NAL S AUTO SERVICE SUPPLIES VEH 101052 03/30/83 41 975-. A R r AL S. AUTO SERVICE SLFPLIES VEH 101052 03/30/13 5600 A R INAL S AUTO SERVICE SUPPLIES VEH 101052 03/30/13 , 56000 A R h A L AUTO SERVICE S V.EH 101052 'Q 3 / 3 0 / 1 3 5 6.* 0 0 AR N.AL S AUTO SERVI SLPPLTES VEH 341*0'70 • page 7 1983 CITY OF NAFLEk)�D CHECK REGISTER CHEC -K NO DATE A MOUNT - -- - -- - -- VENDOR- ITEM DESCRIPTION 101059 03/30 /R 3 13.30 ARTS TOWING T06ING 13.30 101082 03/30/83 2 , BEACON PRODUCTS CO SUFPLIES 101012 03/30/Q3 2 BEACON PVOUCTS CO SUFPLIES 010x2 0 3I i0 /R3 2, 204.00— BE PR )DUCTS CO SUPPLIES 2 # 10109 / 0 3 / 30 / 4908 BILL BOYER FORD SUPPLIES VEd 1 530.72 + 101150 03/30/R3 _ $.$9 SOUTTER CHRISTINE PETMSURSEMENT 101150 03/30/83 12.21 ECLTTER CHRISTINE R IM8URSEMENT 101150 03/30183 3.00 SOLTTER CHRISTINE REIMBURSE'MEH1 4.08 101101 03/30/ 3 42.02— BCARD CF W ATER Comm UTILITIES 101103 03/30/83 42.02 PCARD CF WATER CCMM LTILITIES 101103 03/30/83 42.02 ECARD CF MATER COMM UTILITIES 101103 =33/30/93 1806 BCARO CF MATER C OMM UTILITIES 101 103 03/ ' 18.05_. _. _ BCARD CF WATER CCMM UTILITIES 101103 03/30/83 18.06— ECARD CF W ATER CCMw LTILITIES 101103 0 3/30 /13 24.76 PCARD OF WATER COMM UTILITIES 1011103 +33/30/x3 24. BOARD CF WATER CCMM UTILITIES 101103 03/30/93 24 BEARD CF MATER CCMM LTILITIES 101 103 03/30/M.3 12.1 ?— 8nARD CF WATER COMM UTILITIES 1n1103 03 /?J /x3 - - - - 13.70 8CAR0 OF MA TER CCMM UTILITIES 101103 03/30/83 12012 PCARD CF MATER CCMM UTILITIES 101103 03/30/83 12.12 BCARD CF MATER CCMM LTILITIES 101103 03/30/13 13 BOARD OF WATE COMM UTILITIES 101101 0 3 /30 /83 315.00— 8 CARQ CF WATER COMA CCNTRACT PYM 101103 03/30/93 6.43- BOARD OF WATER COMM UTILITIES 101 103 03/30/R3 - _ - _... _ 315900 _._. ___- -- BCARD OF WATER CCMM CCNTRACT PYM 1n11Q3 _ 03/?0/13 6.4 3 PCARD CF WATER CCMM LTILITIES 101 1 a 3 03/30/33 315.00 OCARn OF MATER CO MM CCNTRACT PYM 101103 03/30 /R3 6948 BOARD CF WATER COMM UTILITIES 101103 03/30/83 139 HOARD CF 'MATER COMM UTILITIES 101103 73/30/83 13.58 BCARO CF WATER COMM LTILITIES Intl 103 03/30/R3 13.58 -- BCARD OF WATER COMM UTILITIES 101103 03/30/13 13.58 BOARD CF WATER COMM UTILITIES 101103 0 3/'-0/83 1.485.00 BCARD OF WATER CCMM CCMTRACT PYM 101103 03/30/93 1 9 485*00 ECARD OF WATER CCMM CCNTRACT RYM 1n1 103 03/30/13 1 • 485.t10— BOARD OF WA COMM CCNTRACT. PYM 1 530.72 + 101150 03/30/R3 _ $.$9 SOUTTER CHRISTINE PETMSURSEMENT 101150 03/30/83 12.21 ECLTTER CHRISTINE R IM8URSEMENT 101150 03/30183 3.00 SOLTTER CHRISTINE REIMBURSE'MEH1 Pa 8 1983 CITY OF MAFLE6000 6 CHECK REl'2 T STF R CHF-.t K E :)A TL-- ITEM DESCRIPTION 101155 _D3130/83 102609 CITY OF MOUNCS VIEW JAN OP CHARGES 101155 03/30/83 338*55 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW JAN DP CHARGES 19664.74 101161 03130 -1!3 79*00 CLUTCH. TRANSMISSIO SUFPLIES VEH 79.00 fr 101 19 2 1.3/30/P3 95*20 DALCO CGRP SUPPLIES MAINT 95.20 101194 0 3/?0 3 10*64 FAUST DANIEL F TRAVEL TR41NING 10.64 101216 0 3/310 /-Q3 ..---.--..__.___f:TCTAFHON-- CORP SUFPLIES _ _... _._ _.._.1.90.21 190.21 101236 03/!D/Q3 200.00 EVAN BARRY `LE ALL06 200.00 101262 03/30/93 21*40 GEIkERAL C;rFA'r.Cr- PRODU SUPPLIES 21.40 101272 03I30/p3 987000 GEOTECHNICAL EENG COR Sc l SORTNGS 101276 03/ 30/ 3 69*32 GOCOYEAR SERVICE STO SUPPLIES VEH 101276 03/30/!3 4*50 GOCOYEAR SERVICE STO SUPPLIES VEH 101276 03/30/R3 4*50 GOCDYEAR SERVICE STO %c*LFPLTES VEH ?P.32 101-322 03/30/83 155*78 .1-3kIES LOCK KEY SE SUFPLIES 155*78 101,359 ()3/30/83 443922 ITASCA EQUIPPENT CC SUPPLIES VEH Page 10 1983 CITY OF KAFLE6OCO CHECK REGISTER CHECK A ^.� DA T_ _ _ - -- _ -_ _ AMOVN T. VEN0C2 Z TEM OESCRZP T' ON _ .. 1 .76 111464 _ - -__ - 0.3- /30/13 _ - -- - _ .32.63 _ MERIT CHEVROL_rT CO SUPPLIES VEH 32.63 101477 13/30/33 35.00 METTLER CAVIEL CANINE RETA _ - - 35.00 -- - - - 10152.6 03/30/83 25.00 PM CITY PO4NAGERS ASS SUBS MEMBERSHIP 25.00 .mot *�f 101530 03/30/)33 _ 1 , 207.98 MN DEPT PUBLIC SAFTY HA INT 101530 0 3/301 A3 1 , 207.98 FON OE FT PUBLIC SAF TY MA INT 29 41 5. ftt *mot 101647 03/?0183 1 :269.94 NCRTH ST PAUL CITY UTILITIES 1.269.94 ftf *t# 101658 03/30/93 - 753.54 NCRTHERN STATES P 0 WEE UTILITIES 10165,9 03/30/ 593.09 KCFTHERh STATES FC6E UTILITIES 101658 03/31/83 9019 NCFTHERN STATES P06E UTILITIES 101658 03131 /R3 2.40 KCRTHERN STATES POLE UTILITIES 101658 03/?C/43 __- - - -- _2.40 _. NCFTH.ERh STATES F06E' UTILITIES 101658 03/30/M3 2940 NCFTHEMh STATES F06E UTILITIES 101.658 03/30/83 3.53 NORTHERN STAVES PO6E UTILITIES 101658 03/31/83 2.40 NORTHERN STATES P06E UTILITIES 101659 03/?0/83 3953 hCFTHERN STATES F 0 kE LTILITItS 101658 0 3/301'R3 433976 NCRTHERN STATES P06E UTILITTES 101658 03/30/R3 .1 NCRTHERN ""TAT -S F06E UTILITIES 101658 03/31 /P3 33.42 KCRTHERK STATES P06E UTILITIES f. 101658 03/30/83 %37.31 NCFTHERN STATES P06E UTILITIES 101658 03/30/Q3 74.99 NCRTHERN STATES P06L UTILITIES 101658 03/31/83 504900 NGPTHERN STATES P06E UTILITIES 10165.9 03/?0/P3 79935 hCFTHERN STATES PCWE UTILITIES 101658 . 0 - 3/31 ! 83 ....._ - - -__ . -. _ _ 1139 _. - ... -.. -- _ h C R T H E R N STATES P 0 6 VE UTILITIES 101659 03/30%13 77.32 NCRTHERN STATES POkE UTILITIES 101658 03/30/83 79.34 NORTHERN STATES P06E UTILITIES 101658 03/30/3 X3,52 NCRTH7Rh STATES POKE UTILITIES 101658 03/30/83 81.57 NORTHERN STATES P06E UTILITIES t 101658 03/30/83 41.06 NORTHERN STATES POk: UTILITIES 101658 03/30/93 _ _ 71o27 - ACFTHf.RN STATES P06E UTILITIES 101658. 03/30/43 71.27- NCRTHERN STATES F06E UTILITIES 101658 03/30/43 4.25 NORTHERN STATE% P0 6E. U TILITIE'S 1016 38 - 0 3/30/33 9.22 - PARK PACHI NE INC SUPPLIES 9.22 101 756 03/30/R3 COUNTY TREASU _ OAT PROCESSING 101 756 03/30/83 -- 18.94 FANSEY COUNTY TREASU CA TA PROCESS I. NG 64.31 a Page 11 1933 C'TY OF MArL =6300 CHECK REGISTER CHEC h"'.t. DA TE AMOUNT _ _ VENDCr _- ITEM DESCRIPTION 101658 03/30/13 4.25 kCFTHERN STATES POKE UTILITIES 101658 03/31 /Q3 17303 NORTHERN STATES P06E UTILITIES 101658 0 3/ 3 0 /R; 4.25 k CPTHERN STATES P06E UT ILI TI= S 101658 03/31/ 163.74 1 CFTHERN STATES F0 WE UT ILI TI`S 101658 93/30/. -__ _ __- __. -_4,25 ___. -- - hCQ THERN STATES POLE UTILITIES 101658 _ -- 03/30/33 9.62 NORTHERN STATES POWE UTILITIES 101658 03/30/13 4925 NCPTH4Rh STATES P06E UTILITIES 1016 58 03/31 /83 12987 WCRTHERN STATES POWE UTILTTTES 19165.3 113/30/93 4.25 NCRTHERN STATES POkE UTILITIES 101658 J300/R3 76.25 NCFTHERh STATES POUF UT ILITTES 101658 03/30/93 - -. - - - -_ 87.85 NCFTH:Rh STATES POUT UTILITIES 101659 03/30/83 -- 63.78 NCRTHERN STATES P06E UTILITI ES 101658 03/30/93 323.20 ACRTHERN STATES P 0 WE.- UTILITIES 101658 03/31/83 ..203o59 NCRTHERN STATES PCkE _ 101658 03/30/93 344.31 NCRTHERN STATES P06E UTILITIES 101658 n3/30/83 34929 NCRTHERN STATES POLE UTILITI =S 1 01659 93/30/R3 - _ 100.92 _ _ _ WTHERN STATES POLE UTILITIES 101658 n3/30/R3 - 9.14 KCRTHERN STATES POWE UTILITIES 101658 03/31/83 173. ;2 NORTHERN STATES POLE - 101658 03/30/83 212.93 NCRTHERN STATES P06E UTILITIES 101658 03/30/33 71.27 NCFTHEFIN STATES F04E UTILITIES 101658 03/30/Q3 77.1'0 NORTHERN STATES POLE UTIL1T?'ES 101 658 03/ ?1 /Q3 246 _. NCFTHERh STATES F36E 101658 03/31 /93 57.85 NCRTHERN STATES FOLE 101658 03/30/R3 159 NOPTHE RN STATES POLS UTTLITT ^ S 101658 03/30/93 1.3.29 NCRTHERN STATES P0 UTILITIES 101658 03/30/93 66.20 NCRTHERN STATES P06E LTILITIES 12 9 706.53 +► ft :�r *t 101661 030/3G/R3 42997 NORTHkEST =RN BELL TE TELEPH,0 E 101660 03/10/R3 45 NO P T H le E ST t-'.R NL FELL TE TELEPHONE 101650 03/30/ 'Q 3 42.97 NORTHWESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE 101660 03/1003 40.13 NCFTHUEST.'RN BELL TE T_LEPHON=' 101660 03/30/83 14.18 NCATHLEST; - BELL TE TELEPHCVE 11 1660 03/10fg3 103.34 NOFTHWESTERN BELL TE TELEPHONE 101660 03/30/ 42 NCRTH4rSTL BELL. TE TELEPHONE 332.02 101696 03/30/R3 46.31 PAPER CALMENSGN + CO SUPPLIES 46.31 1016 38 - 0 3/30/33 9.22 - PARK PACHI NE INC SUPPLIES 9.22 101 756 03/30/R3 COUNTY TREASU _ OAT PROCESSING 101 756 03/30/83 -- 18.94 FANSEY COUNTY TREASU CA TA PROCESS I. NG 64.31 a A Page 12 1983 CITY OF MAPL;60C3 CHECK REGISTER _ - CrCK DATE ITEM DESCRIPTION s�ttft 101T98 33/30/R3 35.40 S + T CFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE. SUPPLIES - -- - 35 - .- - - - - -_ .___.. S...+ T_. OFF lCE. PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 101 798 101798 03/30/ 23.20- S + T OFF ICE '+ FRCDUCT CFFICE SUPPLIES 03/30 /83 56000 S T CFF TCE FRCDUCT CFFICE SUPPL Irs 101799 03/30/93 28.00 _._. S + T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 101 798 03/30 /83 19.12 S + T OFF TCE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPL I=S 101 798 03/30/83 20916 S + T CFF ICE PR COUCT SUPPLIES 1017Q 0 3/ 30 /R3 - — 40._ -- . S.-+ T_ OFF TC PRCDUCT OFFICE SUPPL I'ES 101798 03/30/83 0 71 - S + T OFFICE PRODUCT CFFICE SUPPLIES 101798 03/30 /83 l.32 S + T CFF .CE FR CQUCT CFFICE SUFPL IES 101798 03130 /93 1 ,11 S + T OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 101 7 03/30/ 1072- S + T ^F TCE PRODUCT CFF.1 CE SUPPLIES 101,798 03/30/P3 35.4 0 S f T CFFICE PP COUCT CFFICE' SUPPL IES 1J1799 03/30/93 _.._ - _ _ - 3306. _ -- + T CFFICE P' R0 ED, UCT CFFICE. SUPPLIES 101798 03/30/93 37.00 z S + T OFFICE PRODUCT SUPPLIES 241.24 t 111, ! 3/30 /a3 - - - - - - 174.40_ ST PAUL- BOOK +STATION CFFICE SUPPL iES 174.40 f 101841 03/?0/83 ._1X086.00 ST PALL CTTY CF FAD,O MAINT 101 841 03/30/P3 93950 ST PALL CITY OF RADIC MAINT 1fl141 03/30/93 199950 ST PALL CITY CF 'FADIO MAZNT - - Tio 379.00 101853 03/30/93 98.00 ST PAUL SUBURQAN BUS PRCG SUPPLIES 98.00 101874 03/30/$3 3 18.50 STC SFR]"NG ALIGN SUPPLIES VEH 19.50 +r 101?75 13/30/F _ 5 16.50 STRETCHER GUNS INC SUPPLIES RANGE 101975 03/30/93 13953 STREICHER GUhS IK SLPPLZcS RANGE 530 • 9 -_ -- - -- SUPER AMER ICA _ GAS OIL 101884 03/30/x3 0 99 SUPER AMERICA GAS OIL - 101884 03/?0/R3 3958 SUFERAMFR_CA GAS OIL 101884 _ - 03/ 'a 0/83 .. •9 - SUFcRAMERICA GAS OIL 101884 03/30/83 ,99 SUPER A Mc - P TCA GCS OTL 5.56 *mot *f* 10189.0 03/30/83 37.57 TAFGET STORES INC CFFICE SUPPL TES Page 13 1983 CITY OF MARL'W300 CHECK REGISTER _._ CHECK NO* OA __.. _ ANOUyT -- - -�_- - VFNOCI ITEM DESCp IP T CN , _ .- _ _ _ 37.57 + stttt� . 101 906 — 0 3 /30 /13 -- - _- 6 888.00 _. TR ACY C IL __- GAS 6, 888.00 t 101 910 0 3/30/g3 20080 TRICK UTILITIES OF SUPPLIES VEH 101977 0 3/ /83 101 178 03/30/33 101 A 78 - 03/30/83 45935 WW GR A INGER SUFPL IES VEH 45.35 109.00_ L PCLK CV` DIRECTORY 131.00 R L P CLK CO QIRECTORY 240.00 101914 03/30/13 4000 TWIN CITY FILTER SER SUPPLIES MAI NT 40.00 Ott #t# 101932 33/.30/83 200.50 UNIFORMS UNLINITE - 0 UNIFORMS 101932 03/30/ ?3 19,75 UN IFORMS UNLIMI UNIFORMS 220.25 Ott :tom 101 949 0 3 /30 /43 139.00 VAUGH I S FRGG SUPPLIES 139.00 101957 0 3/30/R3 3956 WARNERS TRUEVALUE HO OFF SUPPLIES 101957 03/30/83 24005. WARNERS TRU VALUE HD SUPPLIES 101957 03/300/a3 8.49 WAPNEFS TFUiVALUE HO SLFPLIES 36.10 f 101962 J3/30/13 1 8.72 WESTI AGHOUSE ELECTRI SUPPLIES 18.72 101966 03/30/83 40o9O WHITE BEAR OFFICE FR OFFICE SUPPLIES 40.90 101977 0 3/ /83 101 178 03/30/33 101 A 78 - 03/30/83 45935 WW GR A INGER SUFPL IES VEH 45.35 109.00_ L PCLK CV` DIRECTORY 131.00 R L P CLK CO QIRECTORY 240.00 .. .....Page 14 1983 CITY O MQFLEGOJD CHECK REGISTER t C H I C K r 0 �.. ,^� T E_..__ _ ..- - - - -_ -. _ -- _ -_- A M O U N T -.. __ ___- . _.__. _ -_ -- -__ -. Y E k D C 3 _ - -. _- ITEM D E S C R I P T I O N 101 31 1 0 3/30/R3 2,055 MORSE CLINTON PnOF- SS SERVI. CES 2,055.00 101r21 03/30/33 12 *60 CICFATCH PAFERS 12.60 101 C29 03/30/ _._.. 20.00 _ -. . . HEL".Y RONALD S�Fr.TY SHOES 20.00 1010 0 3/ 3 R3 7.31 E NPER TS CN UI P SUFPL Zcs 7.31 i 1(]1077 03/30/43 22.62 CLSCN GECFF TRAVEL TRAINING 22.62 +� 101 ^1 1 13/30/ _ -- - -- _- 5C AN SON KELLY FEFU +dO 50.00 101012 03/30/83 23 AMERIC VENTURES TRAVEL TRAINING 23.98 { 131 " 'X 03 / ?fl /o3 - . _ -- 50 - -. -- - GENE'S. APPLIANCE REFUND 50.00 .t. ♦• 10 10 14 03/30/33 15.00 fREIEFMUTH DCRvTNEa REFUND 15.00 101 ^15 �� 1 13 / 30/ 5000 1-JELM (REM THEP =SE REFU, 0 1 5000 4 101 ^16 0 3/30/ -3 30 .00 K+ERR ASSOCIATES SOCK 30.00 0 3/30/R3 - _ 391 • 54 _.._- _.. KREES ENTERPRISES SLPPLI -S - 101017 03/30/83 391.54— KRESS ENTERPRISES SUPPLIES 101.017 03/30/83 391.54 KREBS cNTERPRISES SUPPLIES 391.54 101'318 03/30/ 14 *60 MCCCNALD BATTERY CC SLPPL IES .R 4.60 101 019 0 3 /?0 /8 3 5.00 M ISC PETAL FAB REFUND .. _ _.._. Page 15 1983 CITY OF MAFLCwQCO CHECK R EGISTF'R C l�. I\�om. DAT _ AMOUNT . ---- - . ___ - -- - - ._.._ _. V �'NO - C?. - I TES! DESCRIPTION 5.00 101 C20 0 3 130 /R 3 39.90 h r_ RLA 6 CF FICE SUPPLIES 101 n??0 03/30/R3 19095 NORLA E SUPPLIES 59.85__* _ -- 101 021 " a 3 /30 i° 3 15000 CT TC MARIE REFUND 15.00 10a ^2 03/z0/?3 9 00 OXYGrP SERVICE GXYGEti 101023 03/10/83 26600 FLAGUES FLUS INC OFFICE. SUPPLIES 26.00 101024 03/30/13 150000 SACREC HEART C�-ItRCN FRCG SUPPLIES -- - -- - -- - -- - - -- 50.00 101 '? ?5 03/30/93 33$ WATER PrRCOUCTS HYDRANT FLAGS _._.. 338.5 8 161 � 323.90 FUNO 01 TOTAL 1 ► 30 6.06 FUNC 03 TOTAL • 165.62 FUNC 36 TOTAL 165e63 FUNC 37 T ^T AL 272.11 FUNC 39 TOTAL 27202 FUNC 41 TCTAL 431.75 _ -. FUNC 43 TOTAL 67.50 FUND 45 TOTAL 202.50 FUNC 47 TCTAL 19892.511 FUNC 5F TOTAL 1 , 4? 5.00 FUND 67 TOTAL 656.25 FUNC 75 TOTAL _ - - - - - 1 ! C32.37 .. - — ._ FUNC 76 TCTAL 18.94 FUNC 81 TOTAL 24p 782930 FUNC 90 TOTAL _ 29CDOoOO FUNC 94 TOTAL 8075988 FUNC 96 TOTAL 1829 159.33 _._ _.- -TCTAL - — :: INDICATES ITEMS FINANCED BY RECREATIONAL FEES CITY OF MAPLEY0000 PAYROLL - CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8006 CHECK DATE 04 -08.83 PERIOD ENDING 04.010-83 PAGE 1 DEPT -NO EM +N0 EMPLOYEE YAME CNECK•NO AMOUNT CLEARE3 0002 484369671 BEPP LCIS N 0404.00001 4 45.31 _..�..._.�. ___._ -..._ ....... _. .0002 206242018 EVANS BARRY R 0404. 00002 1 19121.32 t ) 14 I 0002 1 066.6 3. • n '''* 0010 473664474 JAHN DAVID J 040400003 140.35 t ) 0010 475143403 PELOQUIN ALFRED J 0404 -00004 55.08 0010 i� 46986.9181 SCHLE ICHER JOHN F 0404 -00005 0001) a t X ) t 0010 195.43 t 1 'j 0011 475500285 MCPHERSON JOANNE F 0404.00006 0000 t X I ; 0011 ' 0012 357340166 CUDE LARRY J 0404 - 00007 148.43 ... - DOHERTY KATHLEEN M 0404 -00008 254.33 t 1 0012 471400908 ZUERC HER JOHN L 0404 - 00009 . 119.65 t t 0012. S2 2.1r1 0021 469501978 FAUST DANIEL F 0404- 00010 977913 0021 977.13 +► __ 0922 .469200614 NAGEN A RL INE J 0404-00011 4 31. t ) 0022 390444446 MATHE YS A LA NA K 0404 - 00012 488. T3 t 0022 f 476704432 MOELLER MARGARET A 0404 "00013 0.00 if f _0022 473327550 YI60REN DELORES A 0404-00014 379933 t ) _ i 0022 1 P 29 9.7 6 f '; 0031 471322198 AUREL IUS LUCILLE E 0404 708 t 1 0031 474264816 SELVOG BETTY D 0404.00016 482.03 0031 109004 0032 476269815 SCHAD T JOANNE L 0404 -00017 177.24 t ) 0032 177.24 0033 _ 477288389 GREEN PHYLLIS C 0404 -00018 529.69 t ) 0033 472244994 HENSLEY PATRICIA A 0404- 00019 196913 0033 476620547 KELSEY CONNIE L 0404wOOO M 2 51.91 t ) 0033 468364435 VIETOR LORRAINE S 0404 - 00021 406.18 t ) 0033 - 1 ,083.96 0034 037144969 FREDERICKSON RITA M 0404 -00022 0000 0034 474097528 STOTTLEMYER EDITH G 0404 -00023 0900 t X ) 0034 CITY OF MAPLEW OOD PAYR - CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8006 CHECK DATE 04.08.83 PERIOD ENDING 04 -0183 PAGE 2 ►ORO DEPT +NO EM L -NO EM FLOYEE NAME CHECK - NO AMOUNT CLEARED 0041 184440036 BASTYR DEBORAH A 0404.00024 303907 t 1 0041 46846/717 COLLINS KENNETH V 0404- 00025 220.79 t 0041 HAGEN THOMAS L 0404 -00026 305.11 0041 _._.. _ . 477227636 QMATN JOY E 0404.00027 376.41 0041 471502356 RICHIE CAROLE L 0404.00028 324.41 0041 468602934 SVENOSEN JOANNE M 0404 -00029 495,61 t fill 0041 ?025940 * ` 0042 - 477481364 ARNOLD _ DAVID L 0404.00030 444.14 t 1 0042 4.71402115 ATCHI SON JOHN H 0404.00031 666e55 t 1 - 0042 469689867 BOWMA 11 RICK A 0404. 00032 435.82 004 2 __..__.. .... CLAUS CN DALE K 0404.0003 3 2 06.12 t 1 0042 476446119 QREGER RICHARD C 040400034 753.4.2 0042 470267887 GREEN NORMA N L 0404 -00035 642.19 . ) 0042 ___ --��� 469568516 - HALWEG KEVIN R 0404 -00036 532.85 464820466 HEINZ STEPHEN J 0404- 00037 544.30 0042 473604916 HERBERT MICHAEL. J 0404 -00038 442.37 0042 _ _ 476528607 JAQUI TN DANIEL R 0404 -00039 573.93 t .� 0042 392760009 KAKIS FLINT 0 0404.00040 440.55 t ' 0042 472222231 KORTUS OCNALD V 0404.00041 140962 9042 _ 47/563591 LANG RICHARD J 040400042 524.62 ( 1 0042 468181347 MCNUL TY ,JOHN J 0404 -00043 224.10 t 1 , 0042 474607686 MEEHAN•JR JAMES E 0404 -00044 543.36 .0042 4:71627417 _._. METTLER DANIEL 6 0404 -00045 ..669. 0042 469442063 MOESCHTER RICHAR.O M 0404 -00046 147.22 t 1 0042 476340990 MOREL LI RAYMOND J 0404 -00047 695.65 ( 1 0042 - .---.-.-- 475323183 NELSON _ ROBERT . 0 040400048 759.95 f f 0042 468462884 PELTIER WILLIAM F 0404 -00049 600934 0042 470520457 SKALMAN DONALD W 0404 - 00050 155.33 0042 473548226 „ STAFNE GREGORY L 0404*&00051 604065 0042 471721204 STEFFEN SCOTT L 0404 -00052 213.41 0042 471500251 STILL VERNON T 0404 -00053 549 t 1 Gt r _ _ - 471629204 STOCKTON _.,__._ DARRELL T 0404.000.54 683961 0042 474260130 ZAPPA JOSEPH A 0404 -00055 633.45 t 1 0042 . 12 * = 0043 475548434 BECKER R CNALD 0 0404 «00056 245.06 ( 1 1 ,�d„�r► 0043 469441789 GRAF DAVID M 0404.00057 526.14 0043 476401388 LEE ROGER W 0404.00058 618.99 t 0043 473567791 MELANOER JON A 0404.00059 28.74 t 1 M. 0043 468360918 NELSON CAROL M 0404mo00060 . 974.66 t i 0043 47`1 504316 RAZSKAZOFF DALE E 0404 -00061 586.91 0043 471564801 RYAN MICHAEL P 0404 - 00062 478901 t 1 r 0043 474486071 VORWERK RCBERT E 040400063 352. 1T 0043 469502201 YOUNG`REN JAMES G 0404 -00064 647.77 t ) 0043 _ - . 4,p 459.05 0045 47140IR78 EMBERTSON JAMES M 0404•n00065 660.04 CITY OF MA PLE W0000 PAYROLL- CHECKS REGISTER DEPT -NO EMmL -NO EMPLOYEE yAME 0045 472242227 SCHAOT C 0404 -00066 712016 0046 _ 468401699 CAHANES 0046 477627236 FLAUGHER 0046 475587232 FULLER 0046 473807030 PARTI N 0046 472365919 NELSON 0046 468600183 RAPINE _..__.. OOi6 _ ..__ 475363333 WILLIAMS 0046 0404 -00069 467.49 0051 471440267 BARTA 005 473566872 HA IDER 504483/74 WEGWERTH 0051 0404 - -00071 427.62 0052 _ 496308314 LASS 0052 4715 26254 F RESE R6 t 502544037 HELEY 0052 ._ 471601083 KOCNBAN 0052 471501241 KANE 0052 468363473 KLAUS ING 0052 471500547 MEYER 0052 468166755 PRETT NEA 0052 _ _ 472241484 REINERT 0052 470346224 TEVLI N•JR 0052 JUDITH 0053 472481010 ELIAS 0053 167246109 6E ISS LER 0053 501464671 GESSE LE 0053 475441688 PECK 0053 47662245!! PILLATZKE 0053 472662522 PR IEBE 0053 0404 - 00075 40808 0054 4756014 31 LUTZ 0054 0404 -00079 612.17 0058 471 S 62563 BREHE IM 0058 477602582 EDSON 0058 4711.541590 MULWE E 0058 471501014 NADEA U 0058 468361720 MUTES CN 0058 471365993 OWEN 0058 GERALD CYCLE 8006 CHECK DATE 04 -08 -63 PERIOD ENDING 04 -0183 PAGE 3 9141.81 f E i ; . � CHECK -NO AMOUNT CLEARED ALFRED C 0404 -00066 712016 1,372.20 ANTHONY G 0404 -00067 146.59 t f JAY M` L 0404..00 068 46405 ( I JAMES D 0404 -00069 467.49 A 1 SHAWN M 0404 -00070 392.32 KAREN A 0404 - -00071 427.62 t JANET L .0404 -00072 410.85 t ) DUANE J 0404 -00073 470.54 ( ! 2 ,v7T9.56 +� MARIE L 0404 -00074 321. f KENNETH G 0404 -00075 171.25 , t JUDITH A 0404 -00076 355.90 t 849003 s WILLIAM C 0 594.21 ( f RONALD L 0404 - 00075 40808 t ) RONALD J 0404 -00079 612.17 JOSEPH H 0404 - 00080 638.78 ( f MICHAEL R 040400081 465. t ! HENRY F 0404 - 00082 583.01. GERALD W 0404 -00 083 506.74 t JOSEPH 8 0404. 00084 720020 t ! EO O A 040400085 617.00 ( f HARRY J 0404- 00086 172007 5 � 317.d 8 • JAMES 0 0404 -00087 614.67 WALTER M 0404. 00088 5 86.61 t ) JAMES T 040 4.00 08 9 630e35 ( f DENNIS L 0404.00 090 489.77 t ) DAVID J 0404 -00 091 718 WILLIAM 0 40 4.00 09 2 4 79, 01 t 1 3 q 579.16 DAVID P 0404 00093 389.91 ( 1 389.91 ROG W 0404.00094 528.15 DAVID 8 0404"00095 649.50 t ! GEORGE W 0404 -00096 501.44 t EDWARD A 0404 -00097 515.24 t ) L AV ER NE S 0404 ,40098 438956 t ) GERALD C 0404 -00099 508.92 t 3 9141.81 f E i ; . � CITY OF MAPLEV000D PAYROLL- CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8006 CHECK DATE 04w08 - PERIOD ENDING 04.01.83 PAGE 4 DEPT --NO EMPL -NO EMPLOYEE NAME CNECK•NO AMOUNT CLEARED + �..,._._.._ __.... _...._ ....... 0059 476249t6o MACDONALD JOHN E 0404.00100 460.39 t 1 0059 475501000 MULVANEY DENNIS M 0404 -00101 61501 t R 0059 1 X075.70 • a , 90 61 477301066 BRENIV ER LOIS J 0404.00102 200.49 0061 468341993 KRUMMEL BARBARA A 040400103 137.98 t 0061 473260389 ODEGA RO R CBERT 0 0404 -00104 $ 7$.74 t 0061 468582618 STAPLES PAULINE 0404.00105 393.78 t ) � 0061 1 ♦610.99 f r 0O62.__. -__ 47370902 BAUER ALAN H 0404mOO106 0000 t X ) t 0062 471447219 BURKE MYLES R 0404 -OD IOT 68,99 t 0062 474608182 GE RMA IN DAVID A 0404 -00108 529.O0 ► t ) 0062 472303411 6USINDA _ _ ... _. MELVIN J 0404 000109 765.25 t ) 0062 474924209 NAAG _ MATTHEW J 0404 -*OD I10 .._._... 0.00 t X 1 0062 502544121 HELEY ROL AND 8 0404.00111 S 56.60 t ) 0062 _ 473969784 HURTER TONY 040400112 121.50 0062 471748313 LIBHARDT THOMAS 0 0404.001 t3 0 .00 t x r 0062 4735.65506 •+ MARUS KA MARK A 0404.00114 554.27 t I :; ", +P�► 0062 -- _ -_ __. 474078128 RASCHKE ALBERT F 0404- 00115 0000 t X ) 0062 477646662 SAADQUIST THOMAS J 0404.00116 0.00 t X ' 0062 476203439 SANTA REED E 0404.00117 364.71 t ! 0062 _... ..._ 474845176 .. SPANNBAUER MARTIN J 0404 -00118 0000 t K ) .! �,•' 0062 4.73660035 STARK RICHARD E 0404 -00119 . , . _. 0.00 t x _ I ` 2 6 2 * - 0063 471801203 ASHTON KATER I 0 0404mOO120 0000 t x I .,.. 0063 ...... _. .27048379? BLACK WILLIAM J 0404.00121 0063 471901502 BOYD JEFFREY A 040 4•00122 0000 t X I 0063 474442474 BUNKE RICHARD H 0404 -00123 0000 t X ! y,► 0063 476924605 CASSEDAY ELIZABETH J 040+4 - 000124 0000 t X ! << 0063 473684976 CASSEDAY MAR K 0404 -00125 0. 00 t x I * 0063 468684857 CERNI US DAVID G 0404 - 00126 0.00 t X ! - _ 0063 472844611 DALLU GE MATTHEY 0 040400127 0.00 t X '. ) 0063 470880293 DELMONT LISA M 0404.00128 0.00 t X 0063 474829219 DIESEL JERRY 0 0404�wOO 129 0.00 C X 1 .� t 0063 471884448 GALBR AITH MICHAEL 0 0404 -00130 0.00 t X 1 0063 476686996 NERBER KAR IN J 0404 -00131 0000 ( XI) 0063 474743915 KORTUS JAMES M 0404.00132 0.00 t X I X 0 063 _._ .., 468984615 KRUMMEL BECKY J 0404 -00133 0000 t X`: ) .i 0 477829499 KRUMMEL R CGER C 0404.00134 0.00 t X I 0063 469929687 KYRK JOD I A 0404 -00135 0.00 t X 0063 474 889823 LANCE LETT STEVEN E 040; -00136 0.00 t K 0063 469953553 LARKIN MOLLY A 0404.00137 0.00 t x - ) 0063 473700729 PANRE MICHELE A 0404 - 0013 0.00 t x rt ` 0063 474966,150 MIHELICH CINOI !, 040.4 - 001.39 0.00 t X 0063 473903322 N IELS EN RONALD C 0404.00140 0.00 t K I 0063 476863802 PAULETTI ANTHONY A 0404 -00141 0.00 t x I �. vw 1 CITY OF MAPLEWOti00 PAY ROLL- CHECKS REGISTER CYCLE 8006 CHECK DATE 04 -08.83 PERIOD EftENOI 04.01 -83 t PAGE 5 , DEPT -•NO EMPL -NO E "PLOYEE NAME CHECK -NO AMOUNT CLEARED ' 0063 477629606 RASCH KE JEF FE RY J 0404 -00142 0000 t X I �► 0063 472986940 RICHIE STACY L 040 -00143 0000 c x) 0063 4699272 - 21 ROTH VINCE C 0404 - 00144 0000 t X ) 0063 468946400 RYDEN DENISE 0404.00145 0000 t X ) � +�► - 0063 473686517 SANDAUIST KATHRYN E 0404.00146 0000 t X 1 0063 477869067 SPANNBAUER DAWN M 0404.00147 0.00 t X" I 0063 469742645 SPANNSAUER KATHLEEN G 0404 -00148 0000 t X 063 477920170 STRAUS LAURA J 0404.00149 0000 t X 0063 472821395 SULLIVAN NANCY, J 0404 -00150 57.00 t 1 D063 471528238 TATE PETER W 0404.00151 00 00 t K 1 _'► 0063 470626422 TAUBMAN DOUGLAS J 0404 - ►00152 533.93 t � 0063 475904189 TO WNL. EY MICHAEL F 0404.00153 0.00 t x ,) 1 0063 473869923 MCCULLOM JULIE 'A 0404 00154 86.00 t ) � 475 T83041 VIETOR WENDY L 0404 -0015 S 17.49 0063 4 0963203 WALLACE JON. T . 0404 -00156 0000 t K I ' 1063 475747042 YARD KER I L 0404- 00157 0.00 •, t K, 1 ; , 3 396324246 WARD ROY G 0404 -00158 2 s7 so ' 0063 1 9065.88 0064 151440508 GREY JANET M 0404.00159 464.64 t - D064 471384624 HORS14ELL JUDITH A 0404 -00160 520.47 t 1 __ OOa4 474542163 SOUTTER CHRISTINE 0404 -00161 486.04 0064 1 X471.15 �► 0071 389448993 CHLEB ECK JUDY M 0404 -00162 318.72 t ) 0071 470540551 CLSON GEOFFREY W 0404-00163 739.67 moll fl 3 0072 _.. 477627178 EKSTR AND THOMAS G 0404 -00164 478.17 00 t2 475608505 io"NS ON RANDAL,L L 0404 -00165 510.38 t ) - 0072 988055 0073 476090677 OSTRO M MARJOR IE 0404 -00166 731.06 t ) 0073 731.06 +� 0074 38T520T76 YENGE ROGER T J 0404 -00167 507.46 t 0074 507.46 COUNT 0.0167 GRAND TOTAL SS 9524.85 vw MEMORANDUM TO j - City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE:* Revision of Special Assessment Interest Rate DATE: March 29, 1983 PROPOSAL ti 9I'1 End It is proposed that the interest rate on new special assessment rolls be one percent greater than the floating maximum interest rate on bonds. The maximum permissable interest rate on new bond issues is now set monthly based upon a formula adopted by the Legislature in 1982. This formula provides that the maximum interest rate on bonds is to be based upon the Bond Buyer's Index plus one percent and then rounded to the next highest percent. Interest rates charged for special assessments may be one percent greater than the maximum interest rate permitted on bonds. The current maximum interest rates are 11% on bonds and 12/ on special assess- ments. However, both of these rates can change monthly as the Bond Buyer's Index changes. Therefore, it is no longer possible for the City to set a special assessment interest rate at the beginning of each year for all new rolls to be adopted during the year. Rather, each time a new roll is adopted, a determination of the statutory maximum interest rate will have to be made. An alternative to this would be to set a low special interest rate that would always be less than the statutory maximum. This i s not feasible because the interest rate must at least be the same as the interest rate on the bonds which financed the project. If not, property tax levies woul d be required to make up for the difference. Also, it has been past practice to set the interest rate on special assessments at a rate higher than on the bonds issued for the improve - ments to provide a cushion for special assessment delinquencies. (Delinquent. special assessments are over $1.2 million.) In some cases, an exception could be made to the recommended policy on special assessment interest rates. For example, last year several new special assessment rolls were adopted which.specified a 13/ interest rate. The projects assessed were financed by the Temporary Improvement Bonds of 1982. These bonds may be refinanced by permanent bonds if a favorable interest rate is received on bids to be opened in May_. The Council may want to consider reducing the interest rate on these assessment rolls, depending on the interest rate received on the May bids. John Bannigan has been requested to determine what procedure would have to be followed and whether this would allow property owners to once again file legal appeals on their assessments. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the in terest rate on new special assessment rolls be one percent greater than the floating maximum interest rate on bonds. *ink - MEMORANDUM To: Barry Evans, City From: Robert bert D. Odegard, Director of Community Servi Re: Donation y ces Dote: March 28, 1983 The Maplewood Coin Club has donated $100.00 to be used for the Maplewood Heritage Center. I recommend the City Council accept the donation and instruct staff to forward a letter of appreciation. 6 L - MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Associate Planner -- Thomas Ekstrand SUBJECT: Home Occupation- -Time Extension LOCATION: 540 Ripley Avenue OWNER /APPLICANT: Miles LeFebvre . -DATE : March 29, 1983 Req uest Act b J - Ike i e c l d-.,�..n...._�..,z.. Date - 1. Renewal of a home occupation permit for a gunsmi thi ng business. Refer to the applicant's letter dated 3 -1 -82 for an explanation of his business. 2. The business is now run from the applicant's garage. A . A . . 4-15-82: Council approved a home occupation permit for a gunsmi th- i ng business at 540 Ripley Avenue subject to: 1. Compliance with the criteria outlined in the Planning Commission subcommittee report. 2. Approval is granted for one year, after which time the applicant may apply for a renewal if the business has been compatible with the neighborhood and all conditions are being met: 3. There should be at least one wall- mounted, ten pound A.B.C. fire extinguisher provided in the basement work area. 4. Electrical outlets are to be provided in the work area to eliminate the need for extension cords. 5. There shall be no reloading of ammunition other than for the applicant's own use. Code_ Requirements 1. All requirements of the City Code relating to home occupations are being met. 2. Section 36-442(e) requires that all conditional use permits shall be reviewed by the council within one year of the date of initial approval. At that review, the counci may specify an indefinite term or specif term not to exceed five years for subsequent reviews. 3. The city's licensing code requires that a license be secured from the city clerk annually in the month-of January to continue operation of a home occupation, once original approval is granted, including approvals granted prior to the enactment of this ordinance. A license renewal was not applied for in January. The applicant was unaware of this requirement. Comments The conditions of approval are being met, with the exception that the fire extinguisher is not wall- mounted. A license for 1983 must also be obtained., . Recommendation Approval to renew the home occupation permit for five years for a gunsmi.thi ng shop at 540 Ripley Avenue, subject to: 1. The applicant obtaining an annual home occupation license from the city clerk. 2. Mounting the ten -pound A.B.C. fire extinguisher on the wall in a location approved by the Fire Marshal, jW Enclosures: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line Map 3. Letter dated 3 -1 -82' 2 I F� V /:- s W Q IL .j Kf .,�., 22 60 C-1 IL 61� wt ItV lie /lei s IW p 35 • AURtE R0. a < . LOA!' T we a ' o t < LELAN • - - v it h SURKE V. ELDRIDGE M i E AV. ' 57ELM LA. BELMONT , - f K f o v 58 �• , KILLI�AK c In � LA. Y at = W W t O ! i WE I VERNON AVE v 1 Z �� N01J + - o AVE. W LM►000 AVE. E l t � 0 .wI C KEY- lo a W a o vit]57 ST. PAUL ir �r R• ' �8 f RI s � f !K J � t FRI s Q � so 62 4 N 1 - r r — L rrr ' 1 18 54d - �— A • . OF AMP O �• • ` -�� •cap C , �( r �' �. l A m �' `f _ A t ` ^ _ 1 �.• ' L • t or o r Lj dr I j vok � r` � 1.:.. 1. y � � ► Z '� t� En • t OAD w oo i PROPERTY' LINE MAP i 4 j _N 1 IbL rch. 198 2 r City of Naplewood . 1902 East County road B ' • - " Maplewood, Minnesota - 55109 Miles LeFebvre 540 R -ipley Avenue Maplewood, ,,Minnesota - 55117 Dear Sir:. I would like a permit to use my basement for nsmithin . d n -�' g I o of plan to _ put a sign up and there is adequate parkin in m drivew there o r_ o . _ g y y. e e wll l :be _ no ,- other' employee. The area in the basement used will be 15X15 The total:= = area of the basement is 28X44. The reason I would like to use m , basement is Iwould like to 'build up my inventory and customers to a P oint where I could move into a commercial building. Thank You . _ Miles LeFebvre - i.� r- s s rte' •(yjf - .:^i • - ; � 1 • • qW 4W S7 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer DATE: March 29, 1983 i - SUBJECT: Maplewood Professional Building Hazelwood Properties, Inc. Project No. 82 -16 End e. ro_- , �__...._.. . 2, 1c - - - - .. Attached, herewith, is the standard agreement for the operation and maintenance of the private water system which has been constructed on the Maplewood Professional Building site. We recommend that the City Council authorize the appropriate City official to sign the agreement for Maplewood. jW Attachment Health Resources, Inc. s"" A Holding Corporation for Medical, Health & Hospital Services March 16, 1983 Mr. Dave Pillatzke City of Maplewood 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Pillatzke: In followup to our telephone conversation on Wednesday I am enclosing - four copies of the Private Water Main Agreement which have been executed by Health Resources and which the City of St. Paul asks-that I obtain the signatures of the City of Maplewood. Once they have been executed by the City of Maplewood could you return them to me and I will see that they are forwarded to the City of St. Paul, If you have any questions please give me a call. Sincerely Frederick J. utzier Vice President /Legal Services ECEIYED • MAR i 81983 ZI EN II�G JFFIC4 Health Resource Community Services Center • 2696 Hazelwood Avenue . Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 (612) 770 -9133 AGREEMENT T K1S 1NJENTURE , Made this day of , 1983, ' by and between hAZELW000 PROPERTIES, INC., a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter designated as "Owner" the City of Maplewood, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, t hereinafter designated as "Maplewood" and the Board of Water Commissioners of the City of Saint Paul, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, hereinafter designated as "Board "; WHEREAS, The Board during all times herein mentioned did and does manage, control and operate, pursuant to the Home Rule Charter of the City of Saint Paul, its water works and public water supply system primarily for the purpose of f urnishAing an adequate supply of water for industrial, commercial-and' ommerc is 1 and domestic purposes to residents of the City of Saint Paul within its corporate limits, and incidentally to residents of the City of Maplewood for .the same or similar purposes, pursuant to agreements by and between the Board and said last named City and ordinances of said City of Saint Paul and City of Maplewood germane thereto; and WHEREAS, The Ovmer owns the following described land situated within the corporate limits of said City of Maplewood in the County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota: Subject to Beam Avenue, that part of the. South six hundred sixty feet (S. 660) as measured at right angles of the Southwest one - quarter (S.W. 1/4) of the Northeast one - quarter (N.E. 1/4) of section three (3) , Township twenty -nine (29) , Range twenty -two (22) , Ramsey County, Minnesota, that lies East of the West 727.75 "feet thereof, containing 8.97 acres. and has made application to the Board for water supply service t'o be of forded from the Maplewood public water supply system co the above described premises w according to the rates and charges payable therefore by the Owner, his successors or assigns, to such municipality or the Board as the same may be established from time to time; and WHEREAS, Maplewood . and the Board have made subsisting agreements, b and Y s between them, germane to the extension of water service for the aforesaid purposes, from said public water supply system of said City of Saint Paul, by the Board, to said City of Maplewood, and the residents of the same within its corporate limits, and such extension of water supply service has been and now is the subject of city ordinances germane thereto duly enacted by said City of Maplewood and City of Saint Paul this agreement t o be deemed sub ' g subject to said prior subsisting agreements and said ordinances; NOW, THEREFORE, in -consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties, for themselves, their successors and assigns, do hereby. mutuall Y agree as f o l l o w s : 1. The Owner does hereby convey and grant to Maplewood and the Board a perpetual water main easement in, under, through and over and across the follow— ing portions of the aforedescribed parcel of land: A 30.00 foot water main easement over, under and across that part of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 o Section 3, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota the centerline of which is described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Southwest 1/4 of Northeast 1/4; thence North 1 14' 34 West on an assumed bearing, along the East line ` of said Southwest 1/4 of Northeast 1/4, 'a distance of 71.00 feet; thence South 88 45' 26" West a distance of 45.00 feet; thence North 2 00' 33" East, a distance of 88.14 feet; thence North 70 421. 24" East a distance 128.57 feet; thence North 1 14' .34 West, Paral le 1 with the East line of said Southwest 1/4 of Northeast 1/4, a distance of 19.00 feet; thence South 88 45' 25" West, a =- 2 distance of 15.00 feet, to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence continuing o South 8$ 45' 25" West, a distance of 505.00 feet and there terminating. 2. Maplewood and the Board do hereby grant permission t6 Owner to construct , s maintain, utilize and repair private water mains necessary for the furnishing of water service to the following described real property subject to the terms and conditions contained herein; Subject to Beam Avenue, that part of the South six hundred sixty feet (S. 660) as measured at right angles of the Southwest one - quarter (S.W. 1/4) of the Northeast one - quarter (N.E. 1/4) of section three (3) , Township twenty -nine (29) , Range twenty -two (22) , Ramsey County, Minnesota, that lies East of the West 727.75 feet thereof, containing 8.97 acres. 3. The Owner shall construct the private water mains at his sole cost anC expense, in strict. accordance with approved plans and specifications on 'file with the Board, under the supervision and to the approval of the Board and within the easement described in Section 1. All service connections from the private mains shall be constructed by the Owner at his sole 'cost and expense, in strict accord with plans and specifications approved and on file with the Board under the supervision and approval of the Board. A deposit shall be furnished by i ` t the Owner to the Board in advance of private water main construction, said deposit to be for the purpose of reimbursing the Board for engineering and inspection costs incurred by the Board in conjunction with construction of said _.// private water mains. 4. All necessary maintenance, repairs, operation and /or replacement of the main and service - connections shall be borne by the Owner at his sole cost and expense in strict accord with plans and specifications approved and on. file with Maplewood and the Board and subject to approval by Maplewood and the Board. S - 3 - - 0 5. Maplewood and the Board, at the request of the Owner, or in case of default by. the Owner in relation to the construction, reconstruct ion, maintenance, repair or . operation of said private mains, may enter upon said easement area and construct, reconstruct, maintain, repair or operate said - private main for the aforesaid purposes of the same and all reasonable cost and expense thus incurred by the Board shall be chargeable by the Board to the Owner and shall become due and payable upon presentation of an invoice therefor; and if such charges are not paid when due, they shall become and constitute a lien upon the real property served. In the event of nonpayment, the Board reserves the right to deny service. 64, The Board agrees to supply water service to the rea 1 ro ert P P Y described in Section 2 as the same have been or shall be developed for commercial purposes, subject to and in accordance with applicable . rates of charges, rules and regulations as they are or shall be established from time to time by the Board. It is understood and agreed, however, that the Board undertakes to supply such water supply only in case the pressure in its mains is sufficient to enable it so to do, a-nd the Board assumes no responsibility for failure to supply water resulting from acts or conditions beyond its control. 7. It is agreed by and between the parties hereto that this agreement shall be subject to water service rates, rules and regulations germane to the subject of this agreement now in force and hereinafter prescribed and promulgated by the Board or by Maplewood and further that there shall be and hereby is reserved to the Board and to Maplewood-the right to-change, revise, alter and amend such rates, rules and regulations as their discretion shall direct to the end that such rates, rules and regulations shall be-reasonable. 4 e 8. No extension of the private water mains shall be made without the prior written consent of Maplewood and the Board. All necessary service connection taps from the private water main shall be installed by the Board upon due application therefor on a form supplied by the Board and shall be installed by thp- Board at the cost_ and expense of the party requesting the same. 9. The Board reserves the right to shut off the water service when necessary for the extension, replacement, repair or cleaning of the private water main or apparatus appurtenant thereto, and the Board shall not be liable for any damage occasioned thereby. 10.., This agreement shall be binding upon the Owner, his successors and assigns. The Owner shall not assign his rights and obligations hereunder without first obtaining the written consent of the Board, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld by the Board. In the event that the Owner desires to transfer his title to all or a portion of the premises described in Section 2 hereof, it is expressly understood and agreed that the Owner and the P Y g transferees � 1 shall enter into an agreement by which the transferees shall agree to pay all or a proportionate share of the cost of maintenance and replacement of the private water mains and further agree to assume all or a proportiona *.e share of the responsibility and liability arising out of the operation, maintenance, use and repair of the mains or service pipes. This agreement shall be in form as to be subject to recording with the County Recorder, the form shall be subject to the approval of the Board, and the Board shall be provided with an executed copy of the agreement. . 11. That the Owner in consideration of his being supplied water by the Board upon t the terms a and conditions h herein outlined, shall c comply. strictly w with all of the r rules and r regulations of t the Board, and pay or c cause L be paid u unto 5 _ the Board therefore according to all applicable rates and charges prescribed and r promulgated - theref ore by the Board now in existence or as may be modified or amended, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference. The Board reserves the right to shut off the water supply for nonpayment of applicable water charges, and it is expressly agreed that such unpaid water charges and costs incurred by the Board pursuant to this agreement shall be and constitute a lien upon the real estate served pursuant to this agreement. 12. The Owner, his successors and assigns, shall fully indemnify, defend and save harmless, Maplewood and the Board, its officers, agents, employees and servants from all suits, actions or claims which shall arise from any injuries or damage caused by any break or leak in any service pipe, private main, other main or connection' authorized by this agreement, except those arising from the negligence of Maplewood or the Board that may occur from the f urnis.hing of a supply of water by the Board to the Owner, his tenants, successors and assigns or other persons, firms or corporations served and to be served by these private water mains; and further, that the Owner, his successors and assigns, shall save harmless, indemnify and defend Maplewood and the Board against any claim, action or lawsuit brought against Maplewood or the Board, except those arising from negligence of Maplewood or the Board, in connection with or as a result of the furnishing of such supply of water, by Maplewood and the Board, to the Owner or other persons, firms or corporations served on said premises by such private water maids or service connections. S IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be executed the day and year first above written. HAZEL' P ERTIES, I C *_ s By - r d Mc artny, s ident STATE OF MINNESOTA) SS COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1983, by Gerald McCarthy, President of HAZELWOOD PROPERTIES, INC. , a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. By 2 C 4W 7w r Name of person acknowledged 'A 1BUC-MINNIESO'TA Signature o f p i t i ftlsftRW I ed a rt My Coma. ExpirLs AL. 18, 198 AN%VVVVVWWVVVVV s CITY OF MAPLEWOOD By Mayor By City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) j SS COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1983, by and Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Maplewood, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, on behalf of the Corporation, By Name of person acknowledged Signature of person taking acknowledgement 7 _ v Q APPROVE FORMA 0 ED: Thomas L'. ,Kogren, neral Manager Assis t i krn City i t Paul — BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL By President By Secretary STATE OF MINNESOTA) SS COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) On this - day of , 1983, before me, a notary 'public in and for said County, appeared and , to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the President and Secretary, respectively, of the Board of Water Commissioners of the City of Saint Paul and that the seal affixed to the aforesaid instrument is the seal of the Board o Water Commis— sioners of the City of Saint Paul, and that the said and acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of the Board of Water Commissioners of the City of Saint Paul, Notary Public, Ramsey County, Minnesota This instrument was drafted by Name St. Paul Water Utility Address 25 West Fourth St., St. Paul,. MN a CUUNTLR51GNED: YeLer names, Director Dept. of Finance & Management Services, City of Saint Paul STATE OF MINNESOTA) _ SS COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this his day of 19 By Peter Hames, Director of Dept. of Finance & Management Services City of Saint Paul Signature of person taking acknowledgement COUNTERSIGNED: Albert Be Olson, City Clerk, City of Saint Paul STATE OF MINNESOTA) SS COUNTY OF RAMSEY The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 19 MW ...._. By Albert B Olson - City Clerk City of Saint Paul Si gnature, o f person taking acknowled g ement COUNTERSIGNED: George Latimer, Mayor, City of Saint Paul STATE OF MINNESOTA) SS COUNTY OF RAMSEY j The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this da of ..., 19 By Geor a Latimer, Mayor - City of Saint Paul • :_ a t f Signature of person taking a g cknowled ement - 9 - E- 6 MEMORANDUM :'4: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: Transfer to Close Project 82 - 05 DATE: March 31, 1983 lIction by .✓' �l .� V•, �giw4Ly�C ,.p�!'� A transfer of $124.72 from the General Fund to the above project is needed to close the fund. The project was started for the proposed Beaver Creek Carriage Hones to be constructed by Charter Development. Initial engineering costs were incurred in the analysis of thi s' project. Attempts to collect the $124.72 from the developer have been unsuccessful. The City cannot file a l i e n a nst the prop proposed for development a be because the developer has sold. the property. Therefore, i t i s recommended that the Council authorize a transfer of $124.72 from the General Fund to Project 82 -05 to close the fund. cc: P. W. Di rector l March 30, 1983 MEMORANDUM To: City Manager Barry Evans From: Chief of Police Kenneth V. Col 1 i ns s Subject: Liquor License Investigation of Ralph John Karczewski dba Karczewski Chicago Del A 7 .ice i `- �.i ✓.. .. .. ... .�..a .v .,- .+.,..... ..�...... +... .: . 4. After interviewing the applicant and based on the information supplied by the applicant, we can find nothing to preclude him from obtaining a liquor license i n the City of Maplewood. KVC : j s cc 83- 002293 Liquor File City Clerk T NOTICE OF HEARING ON INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that pursuant to action by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, a public hearing will he held on the l 1 th day of April, 1983, starting at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall, 1380 Frost Avenue, to consider the application of the following individual for an Intoxicating Liquor License: Ralph John Karczewski 9375 Pierson Lake Drive Chaska, Minnesota such license to be located at 1146 Maplewood Mall, 3001 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota 55109, The Council is proceeding in this matter as outlined under the provisions of City Ordinances. Such persons as desire to be heard in reference to this matter will be heard at the times and P l ace as indicated, Dated this 11th day of March, 1983, ity er City of Maplewood, Minnesota Publish: Maplewood Review, March 30, 19830 +5'g t i� � Y �V A k y��d Y Al CITY OF MAPLEWOOD TTOXICATING 11 L11"NSE APPIICAUON FOR n •!. { u THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN DUPLICATE. Whoever Shall knowingly and wilfully falsify the answers to the following questionnaire shall be deemed guilty of perjury and shall be punished accordingly. E In answering the following questions "APPLICANTS" shall be governed as follows • For a Cor- poration one officer shall execute this application for all officers, directors and stockholders. For a part- . t. ` nership one of the "APPLICANTS" shall execute this application for all members of the partnership. EVERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED 1. I, L as / (Individual owner, officer or partner) for and in behalf of - f-P�� "z-L- i .� c ��CA �� ` ,, • hereby apply for an Sale Intoxicating Liquor License to be located at ZZ Ll� ooW Iq { y 7: F �.. 1 CJ 0/ in the City of (Give address and legal description) i3�U- I!.-. Maplewood County of Ram se , State of Minnesota, in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No. 95 of Maplewood. L . q• Give applicants date of birth: AN 7 r= �� (D Y) (Month) (Year) b 7 t I., ,�� 4 1,1 hv Rwl S. The residence f r each of the applicants named herein for the past five ears is as follows: - r -2 i C ,,.� / MC ,K, �1�Lj7 ..,'y i /_mss ` ` ✓ �! !` / L� �J / � J �{.. L��.� ��/� �� l /'�•�� /�'� .v .'��•fL`•S ti.�'dS *��i�. 'e 2 YKA6` •r�*} j Tl V L r '���„ t� ,t ai • .'� , � 4k,1� � •+ y y. l` _ . : �{�t L • � I n 4. Is the applicant a citizen of the United States?— ar . P L . •. ��, r 4 � • ` S ' If naturalized state date and place of naturalizatio ;7y Ceti ,F r ,<• {�• t`li c..'' If a corporation or partnership, state citizenship including naturalization of each officer or p artner. 5. The person who executes this application shall g ive wife's or husband's full name and address. 6. What occupations have applicant and associates in this application followed for the past fire years? IL F .: 4 , 4 k } a 1 Y • 1 ibw gyp' ' {t x•►, yx 4A f• 7. If partnership, state name and address of each partner I If a corporation, date of incorporatio a state in which incorporate /V/ N Q S ri , amount of authorized capitalization amount of paid in capit, � �: D G 6 0 if a subsidiary of any other corporation, so state give purpose of corporation _L ',t) t2,& � - L c name and address of all officers, directors and stockholders and the number of shares held by each: �� !/ k I / Z Z 'c C (Name) (Address) S e2 3 -? r ?Z A4 } If incorporated under the laws of another state is corporation authorized � to do business in this State? . Number of certificate of authority n' If this application s or a new Corporation, include a certified copy of Art - : , �: ��� � �• = � ,� -. licti i f py of Incorporation and B y-Laws . * _- - • � • • 8. On what floor is the establishment z � a►: Y. ent located, or to be located? _1 % 2-e -- n 9. If operating under a zoning ordinance, how is the location of tl~. ? % '�� �- �,?- � - ;•• r e building classified? �_ s- ys Is the building located within the prescribed area for such license? �-'� °- i• •�,i7J � �' 10. Is the establish . . ,. ment located near an academy, college, university, church, grade or h.. gh school? ti ► z, *v. •" "��� � �f�' approximate State the a r - — pp to distance of the establishment from such school or churc 11. State name and address � ess of owner of building - , �1 A r ; z has owner of building any connection, directly or in- y ' } F directly, with applicant ? s 12. Are the taxes on the above property delinquent ?_�,,�t- 13. State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, have ever had an application ' for a Liquor License rejected by any municipality or State au ' R ' thorny; if so ive date and de s tail +, t g r � • M 42 � ` ,MS w 14. Has the applicant, or any of his associates in this application, during he five ears 8 Y Immediately • �� �� .. ' �,: y,,. ,. preceding this application eve pp r had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked for S i l i any voatori of such laws or local ' ' •'� r ;:�'•,� f � , # ., - o if so, give date and details - Y X.. 11 d` ,.. •�„ T'"� ,. si $ 7• rye.. Ji 'u' .j: +y � ,,, s '1r r• S�"°• " .ri� e .%� - lX.�.. ^+F� _ - - . �- .._'.Lues� �sel - �'k'4F'° _ �i ,. a.,,i •�. ie .. .. .!1[9a 'x _.s� •:_:ffi 4--- • � l • -= +1: t� 'S"i _iy . f. ._ _ . •'� _ (•r d � _ Yt &' .. ...1: N. .. • :..I{� iw i.tsi :.. .a r 15. State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, during that past five years were ever convicted of any Liquor Law violations or any crime in this state, or any other state, or under Federal Laws, and if so, give date and details All 16. Is applicant, or any of his associates in this application, a member of the governing body of the municipality in which this license is to be issued ? X._.`&2- . If so, in what capacity? 17. State whether any person other than applicants has any right, title or interest in the furniture, fixtures, or equipment in the premises for which license is applied, and if so, give names and details 18. Have applicants any interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly, in any other liquor establishment in the State of Minnesota? Give name and address of such establishmen 19. Furnish the names and addresses of at least three business references, including one bank refer- ence 4. . - Pol. L, W !� 4,7 i ! 20. Do you possess a retail dealer's identification card issued by the Liquor Control Commissioner which will expire December 31st of this year? Give number of sam .1 21. Does applicant intend to sell intoxicating liquor to other than the consumer? Z2 22. State whether applicant intends to possess, operate or permit the possession or operation of, on the licensed premises or in any room adjoining the licensed premises, any slot machine, dice, gam - bling device and apparatus, or permit any gambling therei 23. Are the premises now occupied, or to be occupied, by the applicant entirely separate and exclusive from any other business establishment? Ox 1 e �7 � A- 24. State trade name to be use 25. State name of person that will operate store 7; Z A11 1_ 26. Give Federal Retail Liquor Dealer's Tax Stamp Number 27. If off sale license is being applied for, do you intend to deliver liquor by vehicle? _� . If so state number of motor vehicle permits issued by Liquor Control Commissioner for current year 28. If you are building a new building for the purposes for which this application is being made, please submit plans and specifications with this application. 29. Financing of the construction of this building will be as follows: w 30. Furnish a personal financial statement with this application. If a partnership, furnish financial state- ment of each partner. 31. Give description of type of operation if this is an on -sale license application (i.e. whether cock- tail lounge, nite club, restaurant, etc., specifying capacity by number of customers and any other c . pertinent data). � ES - 7 e_,�j t c ► ., 32. What previous exj)erience have you had in the operation of the type of business described in the answer to No. 31 above 33. Applicant, and his associates in this application, will strictly comply with all the laws of the State of Minnesota governing the taxation and the sale of intoxicating liquor; rules and regulations promulgated by the Liquor Control Commissioner; and all ordinances of the municipality; and I hereby certify- that I have read the foregoing questions and that the answers to said questions are true of my own knowledge. Subscribed and sworn to before me this S ture of lica day of Y 9 THIS APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED WITH YOUR CHECK FOR THE FIRST LICENSE PERIOD. t CITY OF MAPIL 41' 7 � uWOOD ti :• 1,38O rxOs "r :WEN I ' E M:� I"Ll"�'� 001), h�1INNI'`�O1" 5� � 109 612-17( -4530 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFE'T'Y OFFICE OF CHIEF OF POLICE C E March 11, 1983 Department of Public Safety State of Minnesota Liquor Control Division 480 Cedar Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Gentlemen: It would be greatly appreciated if you would check your records for the following names: Ralph John Karczewski DOB 8 -3 -37 9375 Pierson Lake Drive Chaska, Minnesota Patricia Joan Karczewski DOB 4 -5 -38 Same Address Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, Kenneth V. Collins, Chief of Police Maplewood Police Department KVC:js cc Liquor File City Clerk 83- 002293 ` � V CITY OF Ajr 41L---AWOOD 1 I: KO5 "I' AVE N U I: N1:A YI,I;�r'OOI), MIN I;�C) "I �� 612 - 77Q -4530 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLI SAFETY -- OFFICE OF CHIEF OF POLICE March 11, 1983 Chief Gregory Schol Chaska Police Department 205 E. 4th Street Chaska, Minnesota 55318 Dear. Chief Schol : It would be greatly appreciated if you would check your records for the following names: Ralph John Karczewski DOB 8 -3 -37 9375 Pierson Lake Drive Chaska, Minnesota Patricia Joan Karczewski DOB 4 -5 -38 Same Address Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, Kenneth V. Collins, Chief of Police Maplewood Police Department Kvc:js cc Liquor File City Clerk 83- 002293 CITY OF .. ........................... MAP TL--�] OD 1380 hKOs "L t' I: hI : YI EWOW). - M I h 1' I;5OT;X 55109 I3E13 AKTMEI�'T r% IT P S AFETY QFFICE OF CHIEF U POLICE March 21, 1983 Chief of Police Minnetonka Police Department 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343 Dear Chief: It would be greatly appreciated if you would check your records for the fo names: Ralph John Karczewski DOB 8 -3 -37 Former address 13720 Summit Lane Mi nnetonka, MN Patricia Joan Karczewski DOB 4 -5 -38 Same Address Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, Kenneth V. Collins, Chief of Police Maplewood Police Department KVC:js cc Liquor File City Clerk 83 002293 CITY OF ...................... MAP l�i8t) F`kOs'I' :��'I;:� t' I; h1.k I'I,1 XXTO 1). _ MIN N IPSO 11 55109 I)EPARTME `I' OF PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICE OF CHIEF OF PQLICE March 22, 1983 Chief of Police Arlington Heights Police Department Arlington Heights, I l l i n o i s Dear Chief: It would be greatly appreciated if you would check your files for any record on the following individuals who are past residents of your city: Ralph John Karczewski DOB 8 -3 -37 Patricia Joan Karczewski DOB 4 -5 -38 Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, Kenneth V. Collins, Chief of Police Maplewood Police Department KVC:js cc Liquor F i l e Ci Clerk 83- 002293 S � CITY OF IPLEWOOD M.k . M I i�I.� F'SO I .� 612. 470-4530 DE PAR`I'MEN 'I' OF PUBLIC SAFETY -- OFFICE OF CHIEF OF POL I CE March 22, 1983 Chief of Police Edina Police Department Edina, Minnesota Dear Chief: It would be greatly appreciated i f ou on the following y would check your fi 1 es for an re individuals who past residents y cord Of your city: Ralph John Karczewski DOB 8 -3 -37 Patricia Joan Karczewski DOB 4 -5 -38 Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, Kenneth V. Collins, Chief of Police ol�ce Maplewood ood Police Department KVC : j s cc Liquor File City Clerk 83- 002293 ,1 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: OWNER /APPLICANT: PROJECT: DATE: F im. 20-1. City Manager Associate Planner--Johnson a,T' Planned Unit'Development and Variances , 2696 Hazelwood Avenue ..,. - -- Heal th Resources, Inc. Hazel Ridge Cooperative Senior's Residence March 3, 1983 SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL Requ est Approval of a conditional use permit for a planned unit development and variances from parking and minimum floor area requirements. Proposal 10 Construct a 75 -unit (48 one- bedroom and 27 two- bedroom ) cooperative residence p e es nce for seni or citizens, as the "frail-elderly" component of the HRA' s senior citizen /first -time home buyer Program (.see Planning Section Item Seven � . ) 2. Refer to Attachment Five for the proposed site plan. 3. The structure would be connected to the former Hazelwood School buildin via a ni • tunnel. The s g • seniors would have access to the kitchen, dining, gymnasium and meets room facilities. (See Attachment Two- -the ap letter of request'.) PP q ) A Eight door plans would be offered- -one bedrooms ranging from 580 to 703 square feet and two bedrooms ranging from 803 to 920 square feet. (See Planning Section,, Item 6B (3) for code requirements.) 5. 56 parking spaces would be provided in a garage beneath the structure and another 20 spaces would be provided near the front entrance for visitors. (See Planning Section, Item 6B (4) for code requirements.) 6. Outdoor amenities would include garden plots, a deck and foot trail connections to North Hazelwood Park. 7. Prior to construction of the seniors' building, the site would be subdivided into three parcels (Attachment Four). Subdivision is required to obtain mortgage financing for the cooperative residence. CONCLUSION Aaa1ysis The proposal is consistent with the Land Use and Housing Plan elements of the Com- ZZ • g - al to th prehensi ve Plan. Council has previously given conceptual approv development of this site for a seniors cooperative. The cooper�ti ve i s . to serve as the "frail-elderly" component of the HRA' s tandem senior ci ten first -time home buyer program. = The requested parking Similar variances were developments. space and floor area variances are justified and reasonable. approved for the Archer Heights and Concordia Arms senior x Parking Space Variance in to the Ebenezer Society develo ment consultant'to the Accord g y P _ applicant) the proposed 75 parking spaces will exceed the expected resident demand. Code -- requires the provision of 150 parking spaces for this development. The code' s emphasis, however, is on fami .developments and does not take into consideration the unique situation presented by a residence, designed for persons 60+ years of age. If a parking problem were to develop, additional spaces could be added. Minimum Floor Area Like the parking space requirements, the code requirements for minimum floor area are overly restrictive when applied to senior citizen residences. This structure, unlike typical multiple - family structure, will contain two lounges, community di ni ng and crafts rooms. These common areas, together with the common areas in the HRI office building, compensate for the smaller room sizes. In the near future, the HRA will present a recommendation to Council to eliminate the minimum floor area requirements from the zoning code for multiple dwellings and rel y upon on the requirements of the Uniform Building Code (UBO. This action is in response to a February 1980 Attorney General's opinion that states: where a zoning code and the UBC regulate for the same purpose, in this case to assure each unit has sufficient area to be internally habitable, the zoning code cannot be more restrictive than the UBC, Combination of Permits The conditional use permit for the operation of the existing community service programs i n the office facility and the requested permit for the planned unit development would be combined into one conditional use permit. Combination would permit the review periods to coincide. In so doing, the August 1983 annual review of the community service programs would be rescheduled to April 1984- - the time of initial review for the planned unit development. Since the last renewal in August, 1982,. there have been no substantive problems associated with the provision of the community services programs. Recommendation Ap the enclosed resolution, approving a conditional use permit for a planned PP � pro posed senior uni t development for the commun services building and prop ati ve development, including the following variances: z -- - 1. A minimum floor area variance to permit the Hazel Ridge Cooperati residence to offer one - bedroom units of 580 and 620 square feet and two q bedroom units of 803 sq uare feet. Code requires 650 and 9*80 square feet respectively. 2 - 2. A parking variance for 75 rather than the 150 spaces required by code and 55 covered spaces rather than 75 as required by code. Approval of the conditional use permit including variances is subject to: 1. The previously permitted community services programs may: Continue to be offered provided that the use has-no adverse affect an the neighborhood. `- 2. If Council determines there i s insufficient on -site parking for the cooperative residence, within one year of 95% occupancy, additional • parking may be required. 3. Development of Parcel A shall require an amendment to the planned unit development. The Director of Community Services should be notifte'd of .any proposed development prior to scheduling use of the softball facilities for an upcoming season. The following conditions shall be satisfied before the resolution is recorded: 1. Handicap parking requirements shall be met as required by the Uniform Building Code. 2. The City Engineer shall approve final utility drainage and grading plans 3. The Director of Community Services shall approve the location of the foot trails. 4. The Director of Public Safety shall approve all on -site public safety- related signage (stop, handicap, firelane, etc.). 5. The Community Design Review Board shall make a finding that the design i is compatible with the character of the zoning district. 6. Staff approval of the proposed owner's association by -laws to assure all common areas are maintained. - 3 - BACKGROUND Site Description 1. Acreage. 10.6 Parcel A: 3.0 Parcel B: 4.23 Parcel C: 3.38 2. Exi sti ng Use (Attachments - Four and Fi ve ) a. Parcels "A" and "C": Two ball fields, leased by the City for organized softball and tee-ball. This lease permits the "use of the ball diamond, providing said use does not conflict with the use of the property by the applicant." b. Parcel ' B: Existing building, presently being used for the applicant's offi ces and community service programs, including out - patient treatment for chemical dependency, home health care, and community health education. Surrounding Land Uses North and East: Hazelwood Park South: A singl-e dwelling on a 4.4 acre parcel, planned for residential lower density use West: Hazelwood Avenue. West of Hazelwood Avenue, several single - dwellings on large lots Past Actions I. Subject Site 8 -7 -80: Council approved a special use permit for the applicant to operate community service programs, with the following conditions: a. The permit shall be good for one year. It may be renewed if Council determines that the use had no adverse affect on the neighborhood. The concerns for parking spaces can be discussed at that time. b. Striping of the parking lot for 52 spaces. c.- The city shall have a continued use of the ball diamond providing it does not .conflict with the use of the applicant. d The city shall sin a hold - harmless agreement absolving n Health Resources,Inc. Y 9 9 9 of any injury l i a b i l i t i e s for city use of the facilities. - e. The applicant shall appear before the Council if an increase of the number of parking stalls beyond the 52 spaces is needed within one year preceding the renewal of their special use permit. • - 4 - 8 -6 -81: a. Council renewed the special use permit for the Health Resources Center for one year since there had not been any problems caused by this facility after one year of operation. b. Council approved a parking lot expansion for the facility. This expansion has been completed. • wed the applicant's 8-23-82: Council renewed pp special use permit for the Health P resources Center for one year. 9_-- 12 -82: a. Council rejected a plan amendment from SC, Servi Commercial, to RB, - Residential Business for this site. b. Council authorized the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) to proceed with its proposed tandem senior residence /first -time home buyer program, less the applicant's site. 9-22-82: 22 - affirmed their recommendation that a split -site seniors 82. The HRA re residence development should be pursued, with the applicant's site being the location of the "fraf-1 - elderly" component. 10-7-82: Council reconsidered and approved the applicant's requested plan amendment from SC to RB, Residential Business, that had been rejected on 9- 12 -820 2 City Wide Early 1970's: Council approved the 69 -unit Archer Heights Seniors' development. A variance was requested to allow a minimum floor area of 550 square feet. Council did not a l l o w - t h e variance and required a minimum floor area of 650 square feet. Council did allow variances to reduce the parking from the Code requirement of 138 space's to 21 spaces. Council also eliminated the garage requirement. A survey of Archer Heights residents was conducted in May 1976 by Maplewood HPA. The H RA concluded that: h t of garage and p arking variances given for this project should not " T he yp a n 9 9 p 9 be allowed again. While housing for the elderly might not need one garage and one P arking place for each unit, they should include some garages and adequate parking - spaces within a reasonable distance of the building.. Ade- q uate parking is defined as ample, not only for the needs of the tenants, but also for visitors." 1 -3 -80: Council conditionally approved the following variances for the Concordia Arms sen i or citizen residence: 1 es to be built with this building; ) . No garages 9 2 p roject ro ect would have 103 park spaces instead of the required 250;.3) The units would have 624 square feet of gross floor area instead of the required 650 square feet. Approval was on the basis that: iven.conce t ap proval for a p lanned unit development on December 12, r. Council has g p pp P - 1974. Approval included the concept of density transfer; i n and Redevel ment Authori t 2. The Maplewood Hous p Y has gone 66record in support of elderly housing at this site; f i p roject has stated that g arages or increased 3. The HUD representative or th p � 9 floor areas cannot be included in project financing; 4. The enclosed survey by Weber Investment Corporation shows that the proposed number of parking spaces are more than provided in other elderly projects in the Metropolitan Area; 5. The project is consistent with the City Land Use P1 an and density requirements; -L 6: There are common dining and lounge areas that partially comp4nsate for -- the reduced unit sizes; - 70'_' - The-density requirements of the Plan recognize that there are fewer people /unit in elderly housing than in conventional housing. "A smaller unit size is, therefore, acceptable; 8. The City Ordinances have not considered the unique nature of parking and floor area requirements for elderly housing; 9. The variances meet the criteria of Section 911.010 (9) (b) of the City Code. DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS Planning 1. Land Use Plan designation: RB, Residential Business. The RB classifi- cation includes high density residential and office uses. 2. Permitted Density: 34 persons /net acre 3. Proposed Density: 30.2 persons /net acre for Parcel C (attachments four and five) 4: Policy Criteria from the Plan: a. Page 21 -5: Housing within the community should be flexible to permit a mixture of people in all housing areas regardless of age, ethnic, racial, cultural, or socioeconomic backgrounds. b. Page 18 -8: Housing should be provided which meets the physical and psychological needs of all persons. c, Page 18-9: Locate multiple family housing in areas not inferior to those generally used for conventional single - family housing. d. Page C -37: 1) An elderly housing project should be located in a resi- dential district, but with good access to commercial facilities and services, such as grocery stores, drug stores, medical clinics and passive recreational areas. 2) Access to community services which are not in close proximity to the site should be provided by an adequate public or private transportation system. 3) The housing facility should be located so that quick response of emergency services (i.e. med - ical , ambulance, 6 police, and fire) can be provided, especially when these are not provided on -site. 4) Whenever possible, open spaces for gardens or recreation should be programmed into an elderly housing project. _t 5. Zoning: F -Farm Residence 6. Compliance with Land Use Laws: _ A. Statutory Section 462.357 of State Statutes states that variances from the literal provi si ons of the zoning code can be granted if: 1) Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circum- stances unique to the individual property under consideration. 'Undue hardship' as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reason- able use if .used under condi ti ons allowed by the official controls, the p g 1 i ht of the l andowner is due to circumstances unique to his .property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economi c considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable . use . for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. 2) When it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance." B. ordinance 1) The applicant has requested designation as a planned unit develop- ment as p rovi ded in Section 36 - 438 (a), to permit the integration of the existing HRI office facility with the proposed seniors residence. 2) Section 36 -438 (b) states that the intention of a planned unit development is to provide a means to allow flexibility by substan- tial variances from the p rovi si ons of this chapter, including uses, setbacks, height and other regulations. Variances may be granted for planned unit developments provided that: a. Certain regulations contained in this chapter do not realistically apply to the proposed development because of the unique nature of the proposed development. b. The would be consistent with the purposes of this chapter.. .� y r c. The planned unit development would produce a detel opment of equal or superior quali to that which would result from strict ad- herence to the provisions of this chapter; -� d. The variances would not constitute a threat of a substantive nature to the property values, safety, health or general wel - fare of the . owners or occupants of adjacent or nearby land, nor be detrimental to the health, safety, morals or general welfare of the people; and - 7 - e. The variances are required for reasonable and practicable physical development, and are not required solely on the basis of financial considerations. Two vari ances are requested as follows: 3) Variance One =_ a Section 36 -122 b requires a minimum floor area of 650 square feet for one - bedroom multiple dwelling units and 880 square- feet for two bedroom units. b Six of the 48 one - bedroom units would be 680 square feet, requiring a variance of 70 square feet and 24 of the units would have 620 square feet, requiring a variance of 30 square feet. The other eighteen one - bedroom units would be 692 and 703 square feet in area, respectively. c) Fifteen of the 27 two - bedroom units would be 803 square feet in area, requi ring a variance of 77 square feet. The other twelve uni t,s would be 912, 914 and 920 square* feet, respectively. 4) Variance Two a) Section 36 -109 (1) states that two parking stalls shall be provided for each dwelling unit, half of which shall be enclosed in a garage, carport or similar structure. b) 75 parking spaces are proposed; one for each dwelling unit, 55 of which would be located in a garage beneath the residence. c) A variance of 75 parking spaces is required, twenty of which to be covered spaces. 5) Section 36 -442 requires the following findings for approval of a conditional use permit. a) The use is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan with the purpose and standards of this chapter. b The establishment or maintenance of the use shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. c) The use shall be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. d) The use shall not depreciate property values. e) The use shall not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses due to noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water runoff, vi bra ti on unsight- liness, electrical interference or other nuisances. =-- ..8_ v f) The use shall generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. g) The use shall be served by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. h) The use shall not create excessive additional requi reLnents at public cost for public facilities and services; and shall not be -detrimental —�. to the welfare of the City. - i) The use shall preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. j) The use shall cause minimal adverse environmental effects* 7. Housing and Redevelopment authority (HRA) Housing Proposal: a. On October 7 1982, Council gave conceptual approval to the development of a seniors' cooperative residence on the subject site, to serve as the, frail - elderly component of the HRA's split -site, senior residence /first time, home buyer (FTHB) program. b. On December 13, 1982, Council authorized staff to apply for $7 million in tax - exempt housing revenue bonding authority for the proposed FTHB program. The local contribution to the program was pledged at $1,148,000. The majority of this local contri ubti on would come from, the tax - increment districts created for the two seniors developments. The tax - increment district for the applicant's development is pledged to contribute $426,476 of the local contribution to this bond issue. c. On January 27, 1983, Maplewood's application for tax - exempt bonding authority was approved, ranking number one amon the six applications PP submitted. d. Both the applicant and Woodmark , (the second seniors' residence developer) have submitted the required letters of credit to proceed with drafting the bond issuance documents. All zoning requirements must be met before the re arati on of these documents .will be authorized. P P Pu blic Works 1. Sewer and water l ines have adequate capacity for the proposed structure. Roa and Hazelwood are designated . 2. County Roa C nated as minor arterial roadways 9 Hazelwood Avenue is projected to carry 1100 vehicle trips at peak service. The ro osed facility i t i s projected to. contribute 30 vehicle trips during P P Y peak service or 2.7 percent of the traffic loading. Parks and Recreation - it Services desires notification p rior to schedu ing 1. The Director of Commun P softball /tee - bal l use of the field on Parcel A, if a second 4tructure is to be proposed. Z . The proposed trails should be located to coordinate with the alignment of p future city trails planned for North Hazelwood Park. _9 - Procedure .q 1. Planning Commission Recommendation 2. HRA - Recommendation 3. City Council Decision following a public hearing 4. Design Review Board consideration of site and building plans r I mh 1. Keso wtion 2. Applicant's Letter of Request 3. Location Map 4. Property Line Map 5. Site Plan 6. Ebenezer Center for Aging - - Variance Justification _10 _ Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the Cit y Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council Chambers in said City on the day of at 7:00 P .m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, a conditional use permit for the Hazel Ridge Planned Unit Development, including variances for floor area and parking for the 75 -unit seniors' residence, has been initiated-by Health Resources, Inc. for the following- descri bed ro ert P P Y The North 800 feet of the South 1310 feet of the West 578 feet of the SWI- 4 of the SE-4 of Section 3, Township 29, Range 22. Such above property being also known and numbered as 2696 Hazelwood Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota: WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit and variance request is as follows. 1. That a conditional- use permit and variance request has been initiated pursuant to the requirements of sections 36 -438, 36 -109 and 36 -122 of the Maplewood Zoning Code: 2. That said conditional use permit and variance request was referred to and reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on the 21st day of March, 1983, at which time said Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said conditional use permit and variances be approved; 3. That said conditional use permit and variance request was referred to and reviewed by the Maplewood Housing and Redevelopment Authority on the 8th day of March, 1983, at which time the said Housing and Redevelopment Authority recommended to the City Council that said conditional use permit and variances approved; 4. That the Maplewood City Council held a public hearing to consider the conditional use request, notice thereof having been published and mailed pursuant to law; and 5. That all persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and /or present written statements, and the Council considered 3 reports and recommendations of the City Staff, Planning,-Commission, and Housing and Redevelopment Authority, WHEREAS, the variances requested in conjunction with the planned unit develop- ment as follows: a. A parking space variance of 75 spaces,, including twenty covered spaces . b. A minimum floor area variance to permit one - bedroom units of 580 and 620 square feet and two- bedroom units of 803 square feet. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL, that the above - described conditional use permit and variances be granted for the Hazel Ridge planned unit development, subject to the fol 1 owi ng' condi ti ons : 1. That the previously permitted community services programs may be continued provided Council determines that the use had- adverse affect on the neighborhood. 2. If Council determines theret inadequate on -site parking for the cooperative residence Sri thf.n one year of :95% occupancy additional parking spaces may be required. 3. Development of Parcel A shall require an amendment to the planned unit development. The Director of Community Services should be notified of any proposed development of this parcel prior to scheduling use of the softball /tee -ball facilities for an upcoming season. Approval of the planned unit development is recommended on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The -use conforms with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with the purpose and standards of chapter 36 -348 of City Code. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. There is no evidence that the use would depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water runoff, vibration, general unsight- liness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The facility would have a minimal impact on Hazelwood Avenue, planned as a minor arterial roadway. The use would not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be served by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, u t i l i t i e s , schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additonal requirements at public cost for public facilities and *services and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. r I( 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the .site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effec=ts. � i 2 _ 11. Council and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority have given concept approval for development of this site as the "frail-elderly" component of the HRA' s tandem senior citizen /first -time home buyer housing program. Approval of the variances is recommended on the basis -of the following find- ings of fact: . 1. The zoning code does not consider the unique nature of parking space and floor area requirements for senior housing, as such stra ct enforcement y. of the code would constitute an undue hardship. 2. The variances are required for the reasonable and practical development of the proposed seniors' residence and are not based solely on financial concerns. 3. The parking variance is less than that approved for Concordia Arms (50% versus 59 %). No parking problem has occurred at Concordia Arms. 4. If a problem were to occur, adequate room exists on the site to provide . additional on -site parking. 5. The common dining, , loun a and meeting room areas within the residence and those accessible by tunnel in HRA's office building compensate for the smaller unit areas. 6. The proposed floor areas are consistent with similar seniors'developments in the Twin Cities. 7. The variances - will not constitute a threat of a substantive nature to the inhabitants or adjacent property owners. . Adopted this day of Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) Ss. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Mi nneaota, do hereby certify that I have . carefully compared the attached and foregoing of n extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the, day of 19 , with the original p on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom i ns6far as the same. relates to - Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the; this day of 19 - City Clerk _ City of Maplewood, Minnesota H Attachment 2 rl Resources, Inc. s"" A Holding Corporation for Medical, Health &Hospital Services February 18, 9183 Maplewood City Planning Commission City Hall -� 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 r Re: Sepcial Use Permit (SUP) Application for Hazel Ridge /Health Resource Center Planned Unit Development (PUD) Ladies and Gentlemen: Health Resources, Inc. is pleased to have this opportunity to submit an application for PUD approval for the 10 -plus acre Health Resource Center/Hazel Ridge Cooperative Housing Project located on Hazelwood Avenue in Maplewood, Minnesota. The request is for a SUP to allow the proposed use within an existing F -Farm Residence District. The plan and the proposed usage are entirely consistent with the City Plan amendment from SC- Serv Commercial to RB- Residential Business that was approved by the City Council on October 7, 1982, specifically for this project. Furthermore, the Hazel Ridge project is an integral part of a public-private partnership which includes the City of Maplewood, Health Resources, Inc. and Woodmark. Each partner plays an essential role in the "Rollover" Seniors Program and the use of tax - increment and first -time homebu ers financing to provide affordable and more efficient housing for Maplewood residents e It is anticipated that relatively small mortgage commitments will be required by co -op buyers* Mortgage guarantees are, however, being arranged with HUD. The Health Resources, Inc. proposal consists of three parcels and 10.6 acres of land (6.38 acres vacant and 4.32 acres occupied by the existing Health Resource Center) Financing requires the splitting of the property as shown ,on the attached site plan. Parcel C- is 3.38 acres in size and will be used for a three -story 75 -unit cooperative housing project for senior residents. It will have 48 one - bedroom and 27 two- bedroom units and a population of 102 residents. At the 34 person per acre maximum density allowed b - ordinance, our plans are well under that density. Y One parking space per unit will be provided. Fifty -f i spaces will be provided under the building in a heated concrete garage. Twenty outdoor visitor spaces will be provided near the front he proposed 1:1 parking ratio exceeds expected Lresident Y P demands according to the Ebenezer society The 75 -unit cooperative will generate only 250 vehicle trip ends per day; just 30 during the p.m. Beak hour (4:30 to 5 :30) Health Resource Community Services Center • 2696 Hazelwood Avenue . Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 (612) 770.9133 P 2 February 18, 1983 All essential' support services and amenities will be provided within the housing complex itself . Included will be two lounges, Y communit dining, crafts , storage , laundry and kitchen's. Outdoor amenities include gardens, a deck and a trail connection to North Hazelwood Park. . A tunnel connection will also be constructed to connect the co -op to the Health Resource Community Service Center. r Parcel B is occupied by the Health Resource Community Service Center. In 1980 a SUP was issued by the City of Maplewood to allow it to be used for such activities as outpatient treatment for c dependency, chemical de endenc , home health care services, community. health education, the Health Resources, Inc. administrative offices and 9 arkin . The operation has been reviewed annually and P the permit renewed by the City Council on each occurrence. All but the chemical dependency program will continue to operate at the center* dependency nter. Chemical de endenc will be relocated to the existing St. John's-Hospital in 1985. While the Health Resource Community Service Center does not provide essential services for the cooperative's residents, it will be accessible via the tunnel and P will provide convenient senior support services on an as- needed basis. The terms of use negotiated wit • 1 be with the resident association. The important g factor is that these. services will be immediately and conveniently available to the co -op residents. Parcel A is three acres in size and is currently available for community recreational use. The City has signed a hold harmless agreement absolving - Health Resources, Inc. of all liability for public use of the property. While Health Resources, Inc. curr y P currently has no plans for anything but the continuation of recreational usage of this parcel, the potential exists to construct an additional 75 unit building with the same unit mix. If the housing market warrants, as indicated by the success of Hazel Ridge, consideration may be given to the use of Parcel A for _ a P ro•ect at a later date. Until that happens, the property will continue to be available for use by the neighborhood for recreational purposes in accordance with the terms of the present SUP. We thank you for the opportunity to satisfying the City's housing needs edntinuing service to the Maplewood e Ge J. McCar by President be a partner with you in and look forward to being of community. BE A M r. ��• . Koh /m o n -" r AVE. i �� al '�► .......,. L L I ] n K O H L M A N +. �..+./�..J� �.I�� A! -• MCI I + ./!.►1r /W ....+ -+err• r /.� I ROAD -- .._I I Z LINTY r-- BEAM AVE f`-- - RADATZ i C1 a 3 KOHLMAN Q Q` Q 3 E OGE HILL R0. .� t� � Q U J Ix cc Q � z DEMQNT u- AVE.W r . c s e tt f cc W - fro SE) NT A Q3 , H GERVAIS —JL I GERVAIS AYE. G ANDVIEW t 36 [ VIK ING o R. ,tr? 0 AV SHERREN AVE v� _.-..- COPE _,AVE --- --•- -- '' COPE I AVE E. ---- - 'Ke!/e/ f - *" v LARK I VE. f' - Q O LARK AVE. +� LAR AVE. 6.: ._ _.�25 0 LAiJRiE R0. Z LAURIE R0. Lake °�o Q Q z r W p ¢ R O 2� = � SANQ H R T t AVE. D �5 ^+ p (ELAND. ��r- 0 \ z Q N C T 10 N AVE . L.= J "� t ---- -J f - - t-j o JU Q Q BU X AYE BU R K E ac � O ELORIDG E AVE O h _ 4 SA N W BEL or AVE . N 64 Q ��•�,/ { J SKI v KILL N m AVE. _ MAR RIS • u _ AVE VE v ; J SH oc AVE r 'n Q� - ROSE two AVE. W + - 1 Q� Si 0 aYQH m V RY AN spy ��• PJ Q Q �' J� 0 R- •� L1 2 0 FROST c� vs AVE �i � 22 0 r s Z7 W .FE NT AVE. a �S - i.� H ^' Attachment 3 LOCATION MAP 4 N ViLL AGE of MA PL c v: ,Dc PCND:hc ARL ' 1 F r j a; Parcel C , Aj (3. 38 A) o � Co ' Parcel A ( 3-0 A} o A • �• Parcel B (4.23 A) I E 45� �- ED 7 J8 2666 am r _ A r • A. in �� 1559 _ �.• .1585 �- . r w • •� _ .. _ 1 ,Attachment' 4 PROPERTY LINE MAP f; t 1• e i i = � 1 IOU 411k r : •: ,f f' � t f t 1 ' 1 � 1 � ! . I { ! 1 . t 1 t POND f i ; ! l f � • f ' o {i r' 1' I I, li 'e 1= I r , II � I ; 1 � 1 ii jum-upto airy _ f ail e M AN E � +N DATA MO. Of UNITS TS left tS S b► o f ARIA PARCIL C *.Of ACES$ •UILOINO COVINAOI MOSS •.1. r 10.50• ot NS ITT tt.t U NITSIACNI 50.9 P10PL6 •ACRI124 ALLOr►I91 *ARIIII(S T• CARS OUNPACI SO oARAO/ So SITE ARIA 19.0 ACRIS PARCIL A 8.0 PANCIL O 448 PARCIL C S.SS OBOTRAL AUINITIIJ OININO• CorrYNITT , •1 � �I� S RI •CNtN C�MIIURITT RIT MAIN LOWNOt LAIINSNT MAIL ROOM o►Plet UPPIN tOUNot TOILITS L N�diOa. aeKUU exsen�cta. I�ic1g� HAZEL RIDGE MILLER HA 881 NN1w NAi "% y•L.n �• +�.� f�p.Myw WU �w Awwp m� .+ui.» ow COOPERATIVE HOUSING FOR SENIONS ARCHffBMS PC r«..•.c rr r9ta lo� rM gun 0.4 wing *+.« MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA Sm FILM r wMrw w" e. ATTACHMENT 6 OD D D ebenezer center for aging • 2626 park avenue • minneapolis, mn. 55407 • [612] 871 -7112 i r �- March 8, 1983 Randy Johnson Planning Department City of Maplewood 1902 E County Rd. Be Maplewood, MN 55109 RE: Hazel Ridge , _Parki ng and Unit Size Dear Randy: Fred Hoisington asked me to address your concerns regarding the proposed parking rati and unit size on the Hazel Ridge project. I will try to provide some rati onale for why the design is as it is, Parkin The issue of parking in an elderly hous proj is difficult to resolve with any definitiveness and is subject to considerable judgement and debate because of three factors that apply: 1. Automobile usage patterns of ol der people differ from the norm .for other mul housing projects. This i due in large part to the relative lack of constant and /or immediate usage demand requirements. 2. The automobile usage patterns change and the overall usage diminishes as the building's popul ages due to physical limitations and the economic constraints of auto - mobile ownership and operation. 3. The automobile usage pattern may be sharply impacted and diminished by the existence of nearby services and amenities, including: } a. basic services on site, - b. the proximity to shopping centers and'commercial hubs like the Mapl mall, and, c. the proximity and adequacy of public transportation. education /training MAR I consulting r Randy Johnson March 8,. 1983 Page 2 On subsidized housing projects, the parking ratio has traditifially been one -half parking stall per unit. This i's usually adequate because a subsidized housing project will draw clientele who are l i kely find the financial. responsibility of car ownership and operation a burden. Generally, in a market rate project we have recommended a higher parking ratio but yet below that of multi-family zoning requirements for regular apartments, condos, etc. Based on our experience over the last five years at 7500 York in Edina, we have noted that a one -to -one or slightly less ratio i s more than adequate due to the existence of five factors: 1. The relative younger age of the population vi s -A -vi s the age of those attracted to subsidized housing. 2. The existence of a relatively large number of two - member (husband/wife) families. 3. The generally higher income or net worth of market rate subscribers. 4. The adequate but somewhat limited avai 1 abi 1 i ty of frequent public transportation in suburban communities. 5. The previous life style of the residents, largely suburban, in which automobile usage is viewed as a necessity vi s -a -vi s a ' convenience . Given the above factors, the York ratio. of .63 resident parking spaces per unit (or .78 overall parking spaces per unit) has been necessary but more than adequate. Unit Size I believe our current plans call for our smallest one bedroom to be 580 S.F. , whereas your ordinance would require 650 S.F. and our smallest two bedroom is 803 S.F. whereas your ordinance would require 850 S.F. There are several reasons for a more compact designed unit in an elderly project. They are fivefold: 1. Vi s -a -vi s a multi-family project that may be inhabited by children as their "domicile" space, the bedroom for elderly people is viewed as sleeping space rather than ap activity space. 2. Especially as the project ages, each unit will be occupied by fewer people and ultimately by only one person (usual ly a woman as the male spouses become deceased). e 0o ebenezer center for acaincl Randy Johnson 1 March 8, 1983 Page 3 3. We intentional provide more common. multi-purpose space within the apartment complex to entice the older person. to socialize more: From a gerontological point of view, this i critical for the mental health of old in ~" that isolation, eve isolation within ones apartment, can lead to depression, withdrawal and mental disorder. 4. Elderly families are contracting rather than expanding both in terms of persons and possessions and, therefore, do not have the same space requirements in multi-fami structures as may apply to developments for younger individuals. 5. Space ultimately translates into dollars, and in Hazel Ridge we are extremely sensitive to the impact of cost upon the marketplace. We are aiming to develop a product that will serve a lower middle to moderate income market, believing that this represents the bulk of ol der peopl in the Maplewood area. What we want is a unit or membership that can be purchased or financed by the equity currently accumulated in the single - fami residence owned by the older person. And our impression is that while those homes are good homes they are generally speaking modest in cost, size and resale value which is of course precisely the reason they are ideal for first time hone buyers. I hope this will be of assistance to you in working out the various zoning approvals. If there is anything more that I can do to assist you, or if I can expand on these notions through testimonies at the hearings, I would be more than happy to do what I can. Sincerely, Gerry Glaser Director of Consulting Ebenezer Center for Aging GG: tj cc: Bill Knutson r Jim Swanson Terry Mc Kinl ey Jay Johnson Fred Ho i s i ng ton "d e �o ebenezer center for aging - C :2 C. PUD: Hazel Ridge (Hazelwood Ave.) Secretary Olson said the proposal is a conditional use permit for a planned unit development and variances from parking and minimum floor area requi rements. • The Commission discussed with staff the parking at the eXi sti ng facility at this site and -also the proposed new structure., Staff the code requirement is for family-type units, this facility is a seniors building. -The Commission also indicated concern that the people us i_ng the existing Health Resources building will use the parking for the senior's building, thus creating a parking problem. Jim Swanson, Vice President of Senior's Servi for Health Resources, Inc . , said Mr. Hoi si n 9 ton will give a short presentation on the project. There are also other members present to answer questions. Fred Hoi s i ngton, explained why they chose this site and the type of design .for the facility. Because of the terrain of the site, they are able to n design underground garage for the facility. There will be three stories g above grade. He said a number of the units are proposed to be smaller than permitted tted by . the city's code. They propose 55 parking spaces in the garage. and 20 spaces .outside of the building. A tunnel will be constructed between the cooperative and the existing HRI building. There will be services available to the residents of the building within the HRI center. The access will be secured between the two buildings. Chairman Prew asked if there was anyone else present who wished to comment. Bill Knutson, said when they purchased the Hazelwood School they did agree to add more parking. . There is sufficient parking for the ma 9 P g of uses of the building. Some people do choose to parking on the street lieu eu of p arking i n in the lot. He suggested signing the west side of the �n p 9 street. They will encourage people to use the parking lot. Jerr y Gl e ser, Ebanezer, commented on the underground parking. He said it would 9 i ve an added security to the seniors. Van service will also be available to the residents. The Commission indicated there may be a problem with parking on days and times when families have a tendency to visit, evenings, Sundays, Hol i days. T he applicant indicated they intend to remove the chemical dependency p from this location and move it back to the St. Paul facility. • mo ved the Planning_ n i n Commission recommend to the 7 Comm�ss�oner Fischer mo �. - a pproval of the resol u t i o a rovi ng a condi us e Cif Council _ ._ pe rm� t for the Hazel Ride 1 anned unit development, inchd following variances: area variance to permit the Hazel Ridge Cooperative 1. Mi nimum floor - residence to offer one- bedroom units of 580 and 620 sq�ar e feet and i ts of 803 square feet. Code requires two - bedroom un 650 and 880 q _ square feet, respectivelyo ce for 75 rather than the 150 spaces required by code 2. A parking variance and 55 covered spaces rather than 75 as required by code. Approval of the conditional permit including variances is subject to: n use • c ommunity t services programs may 1. The previ ously permuted c y c ontinue to be offered prov ' d d Counci 1 makes a finding that the use has had no adverse affect on the neighborhood. 2. if -Council determines there is insufficient on -site parking for the cooperative residence, within one year of 95% occupancy, additi parking may be required. 3. Development of Parcel A shall require an amendment to the planned unit development. The Director of Community Services should be notified of any proposed development prior to scheduling use of the softball faci lities for an upcombi ng season. The following conditions shall be satisfied before the resoluti is recorded: 1. Handicap parking requirements shall be met as required by the Uniform Building Code. 2, The City Engineer shall approve final utility drainage and gradi plans. 3. The Director of Community Servi shall approve the location of the foot trails. 4. The Director of Public Safety shall approve all on -site public safety related si gnage (stop, handicap, fire l ane, etc.) . 5. The Community Design Review Board shall make a finding that the design is compatible with the character of the zoning district. 6. Staff approval of the proposed owner's association by -laws to assure all common areas are maintained. Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes -- Commission Prew, Barrett, Fischer, Si gmundi k, Whitcomb. Nays--Commissioner S1 etten Motion carried MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT.: Rezoning LOCATION: Parkway Drive and Larpenteur Avenue APPLICANT: City of Maplewood OWNER: Woodmark, Inc., and Gerald Mogren DATE: March' 23, 1983 INTRODUCTION F-1 , � 1 c n Requ Rezone the Maple Hills Golf Course and former driving range from BC, business commercial to R-3, multiple dwelling. Proposed-Use 1. The Bennington Woods Condominium development is presently being constructed on the former driving range (Attachment three) . 2. Woodmark, Inc. received conceptual approval from Council on February 14, 1983 to redevelop the golf course . for the "younger empty - nester" component of the HRA's Senior Citizen /First -time Home Buyer program. 3. In addition to the "younger empty- nester" development, a future second phase development is being considered for a total of about 140 condominium units on the golf course site. The city council initiated thi rezoning as part of problem is that the present zoning allows a - greater proposed by the Land Use Plan. The proposed rezoning to R -3 is consistent with the eliminate the development of potential nuisance use.4 BC zoning Recommendation its "downzoning" program. The intensity of land use than is Land Use. Plan and would that could develop under Approval of the enclosed resolution (Attachment one) , rezoning the Maple Hill Golf Course and the Bennington Woods property from BC, business commercial to R -3, residence district (multiple - dwelling). BACKGROUND k Site Description 1. Acreage: 21.0 Golf Course 5.6 Bennington Woods (former driving range) 26.6 Total Acreage 2-.- Existing Land Use: Maple Hills Golf Course. and Bennington goods Condominiums (under-construction'). Surrounding Land Uses North: Abandoned railroad right -of -way. North of the right -of -way are single dwellings. The right -of -way is proposed to be purchased by the state for a trail. East: Single dwellings and Parkway Drive South: Larpenteur Avenue. Across Larpenteur Avenue are single dwellings in St. Paul . West: Mount Zion Cemetery and undeveloped cemetery property. Past Actions 5 -9 -74: Council approved a special exception permit for Ban Con Development to permit the construction of a 136 -unit multiple dwelling on the former driving range property 5 -1 -75: Council authorized staff to enter into a contract for deed to purchase 2.03 acres of the golf course to retain for recreation and open space. The agree- ment never materialized. , 11- 15 -82: Council approved a special exception permit for the Bennington Woods development of 56 condominium units for the southerly portion of the site.. (These units are under construction. Planning 1. Land Use Plan designation: RH, residential high density 2. The RH classification is designated for such housing types as apartments, double dwellings, townhouses, nursing homes or elderly housing. The maximum o ul ati on density PP e sity is 34 people for each net acre. The number of units for each acre would vary by dwelling type and bedroom mix. As an example, a two and three bedroom townhouse project with private roads would be al -lowed a maximum density of 9.3 units for each acre. A similar .apartment P roject would be allowed 12.4 units for each net acre. _ 2 - 41 3. Zoning maps should be updated as necessary to make both land use maps and P zoning maps compatible. 4. Section 36 -485 of city code states that "In an instance where the ci y council or the planning commission is required to-consider an exception or change in this chapter, including the zoning map, in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, the council or planning commission shall, among other things: a. Assure itself that the proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of this chapter. b. Determine that the proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. c. Determine that the proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare." 6. Zoning: BC, business commercial. (See attachment three.) 7. The BC zone. al lows a wide range of commercial uses (attachment four) 8. The R -3 zone allows townhouses and apartments at the maximum density specified in the Comprehensive Plan. 9. Policies from the Plan Page 12 -11: Nigh density residential areas should be located adjacent to or in close proximity to collectors and arterial s -- Parkway Drive and Larpenteur are arterial roadways. ADMINISTRATIVE Procedure 1. Planning Commission recommendation 2. City Council holds a public hearing and makes a decision. At least four votes are required for approval. mb Enclosures: 1. Resolution 2. Land Use Plan Map 3. Property Line Map 4. BC District _ 3 _ Attachment 1 RESOLUTION Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of A the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council Chambers in said City on the 11th day of April, 1983 at 7:00 p.m. The following members were present: - The Following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business commerci a to R -3, multiple residential the following - described property: Subject to roads and easements and vacated streets adjacent to: Southwest triangular portions of lots 13 and 14, measured as 75 feet on southl i ne of lot 14 to the northeast corner of lot 13; and all of lots 15 - 30 Lot B and except the east 100 feet, Lot A in L.A. Forest Heights; and block two, Moores Garden lots, except that part-south and west of the following des- cribed l i n e : commencing at the southwest corner of lot 2, thence north 564.09 feet to point of beginning, thence south 84 39" for 571.71 feet, thence S 17 45.5" E for 203.77 feet, thence S 74 42" E 172.71 feet MOL and except 98.5 feet 140L by 208.5 ' foot MOL tract adjacent to Parkway Drive in lot 2, Moores Garden Lots, Section 17, Township 29, Range 22 and subject . p 9 to road, begs nni ng at the .southwest corner of lot 2, thence east on the south l i n e of said lot 417.61 feet, thence north 224.55 feet, thence north N61 18" east for 210.22 feet thence N 17 45.5" W for 197.52 feet, thence N 84 -39 V for 541.37 feet to the west 1 i ne of Lot 2, thence south on west line 564.09 feet to beginning, Moores Garden Lots_, Section 17, Township 29, Range 22.; This property is also known as the Maple Hills Golf Course and driving range. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to Chapter 36, article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on March 21, 1.983. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council 1 held a public hearing on April 11 1983 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and Planning Commission. 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above descri bed rezoni ng be approved on the basi s . of the fol l owi n fi ndi n f • g gs o fact, 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, ri t purpose ' p � p p e and intent of the zoning ordinance and Comprehensive Plan, 2. The proposed change will not substantially ,injure or detract from m the use of neighboring property or from. the character of the neighborhood and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included In the ro osed change ore plan i p P g p s adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. Adopted this day of 1983. Seconded by Ayes— -- .Y STATE OF MINNESOTA ) 11 COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. ) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed nted C1 erk of the City PP y of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of 1983, with the original on f i l e in my office, and the same is a full,, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of - 1983. City Clerk City of Mapl ewood, Minnesota dki� erchar W, f �It1ill1 ill X01 - am WIN i WIN S r r .:�t�� ■ter .. • j * ; of ■am o a S � • �it11111�1 ti INS =r�l6i r v i m , � I , �acf► j . olm i dFm _•••�. un all r MM _ _ ►_. _ .rn. �� (Its Ul: ..,�.. ri lail i t 400 - • =,s Attachment 2 Parkside NEIGHBORHOOD [Arin imF pi e L• WE .. i Cy oil tit 1 �. ?-G PIP 2 r, 1 � 1 / _ f p s ail Or ,+ adw- ..�R a VT _ 1Q 4 6 C � � 181 ti t ' i -tee. 3 f ♦ t It P r _ ( - 1 •� 7V • , - 1 '• ` fV .1tl a' :7 :A III _ �''a i.a•� .7 j V 1 ' � � . � .., • � ` i .• — • •' —�' - a 3A % • �R � P � � • +ter, +.ter �? z ICA 17, 1 t; .; _ ♦ r -, r - � � - f ' � � • ` J � b A' .. � ... c t .,. _ _ � r F• �� \ \ ,! 3 5,.; -- '- 24 It t 4 `2 Maple Hi 11 s Gol f Course ` i n f�� •� 42 _ S4/ 3 _ Maple Hi .Office Center M AO Bennington foods (Und Construction) r , 3 P E _ H i u 0 C r' A l C I attachment 3 PROPERTY LINE MAP WITH ZONING F k low ATTACHMENT 4 _ DIVISION ?_ BC BUSINESS AN • D COh'ih1ERC1AL DISTRI CT Sec. 36 -1 Use re ula • - . � Mons. • _ . Ina BC Business and - Conamerccal DiAr ct in the cit ing regulations shall apply 3', t he follow - - I •' () Permitted cases: A b uilding m - - , • . '_ g ay be erected or used, and a lot may be used or occupe, for an of - . _ id �' the follou�jng purposes, an oth er. (a) Apdrtment for on - farnil in c - hb 3' o rn b�nat�on u - �tusine ss - u se. • (b) Hotel motel tou }? • orne, rooming house or boarding- - house. _ • (c) Retail store, restaurant of�c . . e, agency, studio, bank, • personal service and craftsmen' s h 0 I - p, m ortu arg_ - - (d) A utomobile sales ag ency. use •• - • d car lot, parki garage or lot, provided all facilities are locai.ed _ and all services are co %ducted on the lot_ • •- • • (e) N er publishin Jobprinti P p ( , g esl- ablishment. - eater_ _ • _(g) Hand or automatic self- ser�•ie c la •' '. _ un�ry -L • (h) B or con fecti on er sh for t 3 P. he production of ar- ticles t,,o be sold only at retail on the re i - p rn ses ( Public garage or motor fuel st.ati • license _ _ on, provided that a to operate such business is first obtained fro • the city council pursuant W cha ter 1 public �' _ ons must be so lo- ? of this Code_ All p c garages and motor fuel 'siat� --� cared on the si and the site • sh a1l be of the size as • provided in section 36_156 of this division w _ - '• - h�ch defines kindf s o operation, site area r • equired and other data relating to sucl, business. . (1 Any use of the same general char _ e cter as any of the above permitted , ses; provided the u - t, no use wh ic}� is noxious or hazardous shall be permitted. ' (2) Special exceptions: The following uses are allowed when • authorized by the city council as a • special exception: • (a) All .uses permitted in _ • R 3 Residence Dlstr,cts, exce t the construction of dwelling house P g s permuted in divi- sions 3 and 4 of this article, - e R - and R -2 Residence Districts. ' (b) Processi and distributing - but�n s tation for milk or other ' beverag es, carting or bauIino statio o n~ • (c) Place of amusement, recreation • or assembly, other than .. a theater, when conducting indo (d) Yard for storage, sal � distribution ors. g , e and ribution of ice coal fuel oil or building nnaterials, when en •' closed within a fence of not . less than six 6 feet ' - including junkyardso (� �n height, but not lnclud�n salvage, automobile or othe er �•reck i ng yard. (Cod 1965, § 907.010; Ord. N o. 232, § 3810-19-67; Ord. No. 256,11 - 20.69; Ord. No. 402 1 - _ D. Rezoning -- Parkway Drive and Larpenteur Avenue. Secretary Olson said the proposal is to rezone Maple a Hi 11 s Golf Course, former driving. range and Maple Hills Office building rom B - r 9 C, Business Hess Commerc cial to R -3, Multiple a Dwelling, Chairman Prew said a letter was received op the zone change _ le Hill pp g nge of Maple s Office Building from D. Patrick McCullough, It would restrict use of the building. Chairman Prew asked if there was anyone resent who wished _ . on the p p to comment p posal , David Briggs, Woodmark, Inc., questioned the difference between RH and R -3. Staff explained the definitions of both. . The Commission and staff discussed making ng separate zonin recommendat on the Maple Hills Office building and the balance f o the property. They also discussed the downzoning ro ram the m • P g Comm ission has been working on to have the zoning of property comply with the 1 and use designat of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff indicated there is n ' 4 l egal r equirement t take act ion on on the zone change, however, either the Plan or r the zoning ..should be changed so they are compatible, Commissioner Whitcomb moved the Planning Commission City Counci 1 a rov reco --mend _ to—the __ al of a resolution rezoning the Maple Hills f Go Course and th B ennin to l 1 • moods ro ert from BC, business commercial to d o Ci s ct multi l e dwe 11 i na Commissioner S1 etten seconded The Commission indicated no recommendation was made on the proposed rezoning of Maple Hills Office Building to allow Mr. McCullough to address this at a future time. Staff indicated this zone change could be consi at the next Commission meeting. Mr. McCullough could attend at that time. Voting on - the Motion: Ayes-- ' Barrett Fischer, y �� ss � oners Prew, , Si gmundi k, S1 etten, Whitcomb Vp. s 4 MEMORANDUM GNP- . 14 0 v TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer ; i SUBJECT: T.H. 61, Frontage Road, Assessment Roll ,Project No,-.-80-10 DATE: March 31, 1983, 3 The assessment roll for the above - referenced ro ' ect i s herewith presented p � h p ted for the F City Council's review. The roll has been prepared in accordance with current City I assessment policy and assessments are proposed to be levied against all benefited properties within the ro j ect area. p .; Project costs have been estimated using the low bidder's proposal (U.D. Contracting. Inc.) for construction costs -Nand then -apportioning-the indirect costs based on cost projects since the actual costs unknown at this time. The indirect costs that have been added to the construction costs are estimated as follows: Construction Contingencies at 7.64/, Engineering and Administrative at 22.61 %, Easement Acquisi- tion and Legal at 9.23,6 and Miscellaneous Cost for fiscal, etc. at 0.07 %. The assessment rates have increased slightly from those that were estimated at the time of Public Hearing on May 6, 1982. The increase is primarily due to less coop erative agreement funding than anticipated. ASSESSMENT RATE Asmt.Hearing Public Hearing Description 4 -11 -83 5 -6 =82 Water main $ 24.91/FF $ 24.45/FF Water Services (Commercial) 1 (6 1,450.00 /EA (6 ") (Residential) 1 (2 620.00 /EA (1 ") Sanitary Sewer 21.25/FF 19.20 /FF Sanitary Services 828.43/fA -(6 11 ) 1 /EA (6 ") - 700.00 /EA (4 ") Street 38.00 /FF 35.00 /FF Storm Sewer (Commercial) 0.0987/SF 0.086 /SF .(Residential) 0.0494/SF 0.043 /SF Assessments 377,786.28 357,200.00 MnDOT Funding 294 317 TOTAL PROJECT COST $672 $674,800.00 T.N. 61 FRONTAGE ROAD { STREET, SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER MAPLEWOOD PROJECT N0, 80 -10 PROJECT COSTS —Construction Cost $507 Engineering & Administrative 114,683.56 Easements & Legal 469790.00 Miscellaneous 39561.42 TOTAL PROJECT COST $672=164.63 Total Assessments 377 Total State Aid (Cooperative Agreement) 294,378.35 i ASSESSMENT RATES AND COST RECOVERY Water Main 4 @ $24.91/FF $108,024.71 9 Services (6" Commercial) @ $1,540.52/EA 13 3 Services (2" Residential) @ $1,390.40/EA 4 TOTAL $126,060.59 Sanitary Sewer 857.4FF @ $21.25/FF $ 18 7 Services @ $828.43/EA 5 TOTAL $ 24 Street 4 @ $38.00 /FF $166,485.60 36,499SF(�esidential) @ $0.0494/SF $ 1 502,009SF (Commercial) @ 0.0987/SF 59 TOTAL $ 61 TOTAL ASSESSED $377,786.28 RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as -by law, the Cit y Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the assess - ment for the construction of the T.H. 61 Frontage Road as described in the files of- the City Clerk as Project Number 80 -10, and has amended such proposed assess- men t as it deems just, . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT 'RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, it hereby accepted and shall consti- tute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it... 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extend- ing over a period of 19 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January, 1984, and shall bear interest at the rate of percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1983. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments, 3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement aid p p for from municipal funds by 1 evyi ng additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the City by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements. 5. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assess-, ment, to-the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. _ _ .. w r • ... ._ _ r . r .. .. _ . . _ _ _ _ ... __ .. .. _ .. . r J• a• .. ... _♦ __ s..... - ,...._._ .� +ww_ r.� _ .• ._ r..� �.i ..w a .r � • _ .. r .r .. � r i • a • _r _ .. _ a w . _ .r �A�+ ASMT WRSHEET PROJ 80 FRT. RD. TH. 61 3/8/83 FILE 80 -10A WMG REV 3/29/83 !!fflf#ittffwwA #w ## wwwww* wwwwwwwww wfwwaw#wfwwwwwtwwfw #ww #aw fsfwsfww *f #fwwwwwwwwwwwwawfwwffwwwww twat ttfstw+rtwwwawwtwttfsw * *wwwwt *# V UMBE R - PR OPER TY ---- -- K LP _ R ATE________SUB._T•_ WA_SYC_6'_' RA GS S ,UB TOT WA SV C 2 RATE SUB TOT 12 19.00 24.91 249.10 9 1549.52 9.09 A 1390.40 0.90 I 8088 - 010 -82_ 71 5 -.29 24.91.._ 11815.63 _ 1 15.40.. : ..52 _ 154 A � 52_ __B. 98 4 A. A A . �i 3 34700 - 130 -11 301.20 24.91 7502.89 1 1549052 1549.52 1 1390.40 1390.49 ' 34789 - 088 -11 163.40 24.91 4079.29 1 1548.52 1549.52 1 1390.40 1390.40 4 ,, S 34200 - 188 -1 _.8.,89.. 2 4..91._ __0.00 _ 8 1540., 52 8.00 0 13 90 . 4 8 0. 90 e 6 34700- 110 -11 259.40 24.91 6461.65 _ 1 1549.52 1544.52 �~ 1 1390.48 1390.49 ' 7 69909-011-01 0.90 24.91 0.00 '� 0 1540.52 0.09 8 1390.40 0.08 ,. ' 9808- 82fd -9L ._._.�_6A_: 24 ,91._ -- - -8. t 00 _ _._ _ 0 a.54A.52 _, 9 g _ 9 1 390 . . 40 0.08 h : 9 69090 039 - 01 9.99 24.91 4.99 0 1540.52 0.00 8 1399.48 0.08 69909 133 - 91 0.80 24.91 0.00 9 1548.52 0.00 A 1399.40 0100 _111_81, 465. _- _24 .9.1______ - 11588.13 3 1540.52 0 1390_.40 0 .98 12 347.09- 948 -14 912.99 24.91 22740.34 _ 2 1548.52 3081.04 A 1390.48 0.00 3 '` 13. 3479.9- 019 -15 430.89 24.91 10731.23 0 1540.52 9.00 0 1399.40 A A0 ' i ' f 4288 828 - 1� 2 65.68_ 24.41_.___,_._ - 6 616. 0 1390.40 � AB_ ` 0 A . 08 _. 1:640 �? 8.. - �'` 15 34700- 810 -17 249.19 24.91 5989.89 9 1549.52 0.09 0 1390.49 0008 -z 16 34700 - 910 -18 282.80 24.91 5851.75 9 1540.52 0.00 0 1390.49 9.09 t» �Z89- 920 -20 _.._ 4 91_� 9216.70 0_ 1549_.52 9. 09 A_ 1399 40 0.0 '' - .---2 - - - - - �t TOTALS 4 4336.60 1 108024.71 9 9 c4 a aawt_ *tat *aa�w *aawwaawa_aat_a_a_ w w a!t * * aa a a . w_aa__a a a_ aw aata_ a_ aaawa _ NUMBER S SAN F F S SUB T S _ww__aww # RATE _ S SUB TOT - r++ t t* aw# a* ftttarw+► a aaaaaaaaaat #aawaataaa�►wft�►taawaaa a aaw�* aw *aa *a�awaawaww *aa * *wwwawawawww 21.25 _ _ 8.08 219 2 2 6 626.90 2 21.25 1 13321.63 1 1 8 828.43 8 828.43 3 1 159.60 2 21.25 3 3208.25 1 1 8 828.43 8 828..43 __ 4.._•__ 2 2 9.9 B . _. __ _ _._.. 21..2 5 _ _____ r .16 9 7.8 8 _ _ _ _ _, _ 1 _ _ - _ - ----828.43.-. - 828.43..- 13864.68 4171.29 P a I wwwwwf # fwwwwfwwwfaw ww www awww www #ff 3� ST F.F. RATE SUB TOT ' ; ww# www #w # #ww *w *wtaaw #wwww ## �II44 � 2 54.. 60 3 8.08 2 074.86 c 715.20 38.00 27177.60 _ 301.29 3d.09 11445.60 - X 0.3,49 - - 38.09 6209.29 0.00 38.80 8.00 259.40 38.90 9857.20 9 }B0 3 8..80 ®�QA 0.09 38.00 8.00"' 0.00 38.00 0.00 q- 3 8 -2 00 0.0 465.20 38.00 17677. 912.90 38.00 34690.20 , 265.60 38.98 10892.80 248.18 38.00 9123.80 _.. _ 282.80 . - - 38.09 _._ _ 7796.40 379.00 38.00 14960.88 F-� ,._ 4381.20 -. _ - -. -- -- _ _ _. 166485.68_ Y _ -_ _ -_._ _. _._ r._�_._- __0000_ _ __r. -...__ r•.+ -.�- ..r_ r.___. .r- ..- 0000_. _.. r.ti...... i 0000 .. __ .-. • _ ._ ._ .. _. 0000. ._.. r. _ _.- .__ _ -. .. _ ._ ... _ __ . � . 0 f •C C C C C� 1 ' 4 -------- -- -...... w w wwwww. r rs.. ww.. .rwwwwwwwwwwww I IN w ws/sNftAtk�Att t ttAiiii #iititiiriiiittiiiit * _ RATE__- __ . *iiiitii ! !ii #Aiiiiti i i 1 0 0 . .8987 0 0.08 A A . .0494 0 0.00 2 2323.90 B9S . 5122.1! _ 0494_ _ 3 2 22733 . _� B . 5 _. _....__.24666 _ _ _.. , 0 301.34 2 -_._.- 57.02.4 y 4 1 14780 . .0987 1 145.0.89 3 3633 . .0494 1 179.47 1 17367.08 " " iqil C - _ _ . �„ �..�.�.�r' � w •. � •.�� +.�. -w+« .. �. �... �- «. �-v •..� •+ n �+ •.�.. r w r r+• •.... _..- • -. ....... .. .- .. .» « .. w ► � ... •..« w wr. wn�w�. �.� .._ �.....� � +_� �+ r w w..- w..w�. f wr.I. . . .. .. _ � � .. �. ,� � •. �.._ .. _ .. .. .. r_ M•! • � - .. w. •r.... � f I .. .. .. 1. 1.�.a. �. � � t .. J i IL a OIL • • • _ • ••. ,¢ /.tI � .ill o� • . o p 41J. AL 11 r /0 L 1 C 9 - C 11 . 1 ' J f • f L .` 0' P �► to • � _ ._ �,. � s �Mw�l haN� . . f„ -,- 0UTL07 --!A • : lc fl z f IP 4.4 • 1 eto to ' w I v w CL • ... � � •� • �: .Girt' t� • , • O 1.2 111 16 r Q f t 010 18 • 1e • '/,11 POP AMIRESSMENT AREA r oso _._.._._.... Lo a so AV El' ���• ~ ' ' �.... ....� .`.`_�....., — — � ... - .. • 44 i • TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: DATE: MEMORANDUM City Manager Thomas Ekstrand-- Associate Planner Alley Vacation East of Desoto Street, North of Kingston Avenue Walter Laszcwski March 23, 1983 SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL Re uest F Asst ° c. n _ . 1E 21 R r- Vacation of the alley lying-directly east of DeSoto Street, between Kingston Avenue and Ripley Avenue. Purpo The purpose of the vacation is to increase the size of the properties abutting the alley. Each landowner would acquire 7 -1/2 feet of additional lot depth. CONCLUSION Issues Staff's only concern with the proposed vacation is that the attached garage at 1771 Burr Street may end up sitting partially on the property of 1778 DeSoto Street. Code requires at least a five -foot setback to a lot line. There is no public need in retaining this right -of -way. Therefore, staff would support approval of the vacation if it is proven by a surveyor's certifi- cate or property stakes that the garage at 1771 Burr Street can meet a five - foot setback from the alley's centerline after the vacation. One last alternative, however, would be for the owner of 1778 DeSoto Street to quit claim his half of the alley over to the owner of 1771 Burr Street. This would eliminate the concern that the garage at 1771 Burr Street may be on the neighbor's land or in violation of setbacks. If the owner of 1778 DeSoto . Street does not wish to deed over his half of the vacated alley, staff would recommend that the alley between lots b and 7 and lots 24 and 25 not be vacated. RECOMMENDATION I. Approval of the enclosed resolution (attachment four) vacating the alley, except that part abutting lots six and seven. II. Approval of the enclosed resolution (attachment five) vacating the alley .. abutting lots six and seven, subject to one of the following before record- ing the vacation a. It is verified to . the city by property stakes or garage on 1771 Burr Street is as least five feet property l i n e . b. A - deed from 1778 DeSoto Street is presented to t feet of the alley abutting lots six and seven to c. A setback variance is granted by the city. survey that the from, the west he city deedi ng the 7.5 1771 Burr Street. BACKGROUND Alley Description 1. Length: 599 feet 2. Width: 15 feet • 3. Existing Use: . Undeveloped, except for an attached ara e'± at 1771 Burr Street which overlaps onto the right -of -way. Surrounding Land Use Single dwellings PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 1. Land Use Plan . designation : RL , low density residential 2. Zoning: R -1, single dwelling residential 3 3. State law: Section 412.851 of the State Statutes allows a city to vacate any interest in property when the council makes a finding that "it appears to be in the public interest to do so." Code requi res a minimum of a five -foot s i deyard setback. The house at 1771 Burr Street faces north, therefore, it may have a si deyard setback problem if the alley is vacated. 1. Recommendation by the Planning Commission 2. Public hearing and decision by the City Council (three votes are needed for approval). jw Enclosures: 1, Location Map 2. Property Line Map 3. Petitions 4. Resolution--Attachment 4 5. Resolution -- Attachment 5 2 Q cc Q - V • PALM CT • CONN0 CT J _ 22 L'! H z = 10 �- s • = W !- C W IN- JK jNQsx t G V W ac { N _�� E. W < W 4 o W 4 w ICE AVE. p 30 dw W :.. 49 SS 57 ST. PAUL MOM LARK A VE. VI CIN 4g LITTLE CANADA W 35 A RD. J < cc 2S ' N T 25 .. .� o BURKE AV. a. = ELDRIDGE N I E AV. Sandy .....,. L KLMONT LA, aELMONT 4 Coke aK1 0 v 58 d SKILLMAN KILLMAN AVE ; 4i V E h NON AVE a ac = > W ac W _ o < ac .J G� MT. VERNON AVE a~c o MRN J I D OWNS AVE W = . E 0 o W so 2� ROSELAWN AVE. W I S 26 W o 3 O [�qM AV. - w � L o0o AvE. e ELL,c �1t y Fxumm&R AVE.t Z FEN TON AVE 7 11 C y O r to W !b AV o - i v 58 1) 1 F 36 go — LA. - 9�� 61 LOCATION MAP' i IS41 F 54 [+i i a • 1 i / b • 0 6 t 7 3 n5 x.562 •�� E :•.. 44 r+ EY 01 .. 4 -F + c.? 7 120.7 �?b 1 re 1 t 1 73 •` 24 - _ 7 1 40 2z AC VAL S AU T X30 REPAIR GA E �i� °- 1 7 • ' Y r # T. - A K , `� f� 3 1 - ' ` ' ` —'Ct A, _ Svc - - � a y e- 3 , l ,� _� • �e '�� •E IOW ►• '"' � � � •' �b• L to � .. r3:. s ; — -- ---- • ! IF ST TIC # ,� V ^ t .io • t 1 Olt it f: C » •`' 4 Z • rr , t �► .... 1 of f ORB y ^ j LR . � II fir ms •LP 1. � L woof .� PROPERTY LINE MAP - r Di Driveway Blacktop Driveway PUBLIC VACATION PETITION We undersigned, being a majority of the owners of land abutting on =_the (street alley , or (public easement) described as: zo ,✓ -s ���.�,✓ �e ��,� Gam` y do hereby petition the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, to vacate the above described are Name Signature (Please print or type) �' Abstractor's List No. L � V—,4 ,� � CA 7 2Z -F-9� A400o. l � mil/ I�l�i Sow GoT� _ Ace. " 7.2 1 9/a 3 /sa 0 7 S�o Soto P.,aul �O�L � C;�o a Attachment Four Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting g of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council A Chambers in said City on the day of 1983 at 7:00 P .m. The following members were present: 4. T The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Walter Laszcwski initiated proceedings to vacate the P ubl i c interest in the following described real property: . The alley in block five, Kings Addition to the City of St. Paul, lying n Y 9 between the south l i n e of Ripley Street and the north line of Kingston Avenue, * except that part abutting lots six and seven.and lots 24 and .25 WHEREAS, the following adjacent ro erties are affected: P P d. Lots 1 -5, 8 -23 and 26 -30, block 5 Kings Addition to the City of St. Paul . WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. This vacation was initiated by Walter Laszcwski on February 18, 1983; 2. A majority of the owners of property abuttin said alley have signed 9 Y g a petition for this vacation; 3. This vacation was reviewed by the Planning Commission on March arch 21, 1983. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that this vacation be approved; 4. The City Council held a public hearing on 1983 to con- sider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also con- sidered reports and recommendations of the city staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above described alley, public interest in the property will accrue to the following described abutting properties: Lots 1 -5, 8 -23 and 26 -30, block 5 Kings Addition to the City of St. Paul NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood City Council that it is in the public interest to grant the above-described vacation on die basis .of the following findings of fact: 1. There is no need for a public alley over this right -of -way. r This vacation is subject to the retention of Adopted this day of 19830 . Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City y of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1983, with the original on file in my office and the same is a full, true -and complete transcript P P therefrom insofar as the same relates to vacation of this alley. Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the Cit y this day of 1983. City Cl erk City of Maplewood, Minnesota Attachment Five Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City C ouncil g y ounc�l of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council . P Chambers in said City on the day of , 1983 at 7:00 .m. . The following members were present: . The following members were absent: - WHEREAS, Walter Laszcwski initiated proceedings to vacate the public i nterest in the following described real property: 1 . That portion of the alley right -of -way lying in block 5, Kings Addition to the City of St. Paul, abutting lots six and seven .and l ots 24 and 25. WHEREAS, the following adjacent properties are affected: Lots 6 and 7 and lots 24 and 25, King Addition to the City of St y Pa ul WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as fol lows: 1. This vacation was initiated by Walter Laszcwski on February 18, 1983; 2. A majority of the owners of property abutting said alley have sig ned a petition for this vacation; 3. This vacation was reviewed b the Planning Commission Y g s i .son on March 21, 1983. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Counci that .thi s vacation be approved; 4. The City Cou held a consider this vacation, pursuant to law. All pi opportunity to be heard also considered reports Commission. public hearing on Notice thereof wa ersons present at th and present written and recommendations , 1983 to published and mailed is hearing were given an statements . The Council of the city staff and Planning WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above described alley, public interest in the property will accrue to the following described abutting properties: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood ewood Ci-t Council that i t i s i P Y n the public interest to grant the above- described vacation on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. There i ht -of -wa w 9 Y t. s no need for a public alley over this ri . c This vacation is subject to one of the following: 1. It is verified to the city by property .stakes or surve y that the garage on 1771 - burr Street is at least five feet from the west property line, 2. A deed from 1778 Desoto Street is presented to the city deedin 9 the � 7.5 feet of .the alley abutting lots si x and seven to 177 Burr Street. Adopted this day of 1983. Seconded by Ayes"Im STATE OF MIN;IESOTA) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I. the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have careful compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the Ci of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1983, wi th the original on f i l e in my office and the same is a full , true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to vacation of this alley, Witness my. hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of 1983. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota s B. Alley Vacation: Between DeSoto Street and Burr Street Secretary son said the proposal is to vacate the alley to increase the size e tar y P ro P of P roperti es abutting the alley. Staff is recommending approval of the proposal. Chairman Prew asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment on the proposal. Walt Laszcwski , 1764 DeSoto Street, questioned how the owner of 1771 ever obtained a ermi t to construct a garage and an addition to their home P on an alley definitely way that was never vacated. He said the structure is on the alley way. Commissioner Fischer move the P1 anni n g_Commi ss i on recommen t o the Cam Council approval of the resolution vacatin the al_ 1 ey except that .part abutting lo ts six and seven. Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes—Commissioners Prew, Barrett, Fischer, Si gmundi k, Sletten, Whitcomb. Commissioner Whitcomb m oved the Planning Commission recommend to the Cit Council a royal oft h ' resolution vacatin the alley abutting lots six and e seven, sub 'ect to either ' d to the city b property stakes or survey that the garage ). It is verified y yp P Y on 1771 Burr Street is at least five feet from the west property l i n e , or 20 If the garage .does exist within the limits of the expanded lot, a variance for the five-foot setback requirement ' i s obtained or i et i s resented to the city deeding the 7i,5 3. A deed from 1778 ,DeSoto S tre p feet of the alley abutting lots six and seven to 1771 Burr Street before recording the vacation. Commissioner Fischer seconded - Fischer, S i gmundi k, S1 etten, Whitcomb Ayes- -Commi ssi oners Prew, Barrett, MEMORANDUM T0: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Rezoning LOCATION: 1685 White Bear Avenue APPLICANT: City of Maplewood OWNER: Commenco Corporation PROJECT: Kentucky Fried Chicken DATE: March 23, 1983 REQUEST F a�_ (0 0 L c Rezone the Kentucky Fried Chicken site from BC, business commercial to R -1, residence district (single dwelling). CONCLUSION Comments The Ci Council initiated this rezoning as part of This is where the zoning allows a greater intensity proposed by the Land Use Plan. Council changed the west side of White Bear Avenue from LSC , limited sei low density residential last June. its "downzoni ng" program. of land use than is Plan designation for the rvi ce commercial to RL , An R -1 zone would make the Kentucky Fried Chicken business a non - conforming use. This means that it could continue or be sold for another restaurant, but Kentucky Fried Chicken could not be expanded or changed to another type of use without a conditional use permit from the city council, The only use, other than a restaurant, that would be allowed without a conditional use permit would be a single dwelling. This seems unlikely to happen, PP en. Staff's recommendation for an R -1 zone is based on council's 1982 decision to designate the west si de of White Bear Avenue, including Kentucky Fried Chicken, for residential use. Staff had recommended a designation of RB, residential business that would allow both residential and business uses Recommendation Approval of the enclosed resolution rezoning this site to R -1, residence district (single dwelling). • BACKGROUND Site Description Acreage: 15,180 square feet Existing use: Kentucky Fried Chicken Surrounding Land Uses Northerl and westerl single dwellings Easterly: White Bear Avenue and a shopping center Southerly: Larpenteur Avenue and commercial development Past Action 6- 28 -82: Council amended the Comprehensive Plan to change the land use designation for the west side of White Bear Avenue, from Larpenteur Avenue to Frost Avenue, from (LSC) 1 imi ted service commercial to (RL) low density residential DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Planning 1. Land Use Plan designation: RL, residential lower density (see attachment four) 2. The RL designation is primarily for a variety of single- dwelling homes. An occasional double dwelling is allowed. 3. Zoning maps should be updated as necessary to make both land use maps and zoning maps compatible. 4. Section 36 -485 of city code states that "In any instance where the city council or the planning commission is required to consider an exception or change in this chapter, including the zoning map, in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, the council or planning commission shall, among other things: a. Assure itself that the proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of this chapter. b. Determine that the proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the'use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood. and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. c. Determine that the proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and ths, public welfare." 5. Zoning: BC, business commercial 2 6. The BC zone allows a wide range of commercial uses. (See attachment five.) 7. The existing building would become a nonconforming use if their zoning is approved. The following code requirements from section 36 -17 apply, (a) - Any lawful use of a building or land existing at the effective date _ of any provision of this chapter may be continued although such use does not'conform to such provisions of this chapter. (b) The substitution of one nonconforming use for another nonconforming use may be permitted by the city council by special use permit, as provided in article III of this chapter; provided that, such noncon- forming use is determined by the city council to be of the same or more restrictive nature as the original nonconforming use. Whenever a nonconforming use of a building or land has been changed to a use of a more restrictive classi fication or to a 'conforming use, such use shall not thereafter be changed to a use of a l ess restricted cl assi fi - cation. (c) A nonconforming building whol or partially destroyed by fire explo- sion, flood or other phenomenon, or legally condemned , may be re- constructed and used for the same nonconforming use; provided that, building reconstruction shall be commenced within one year from the date the building was destroyed or condemned and shall be carried on without interruption. (d) If a nonconforming use of a building or land is voluntari abandoned and ceases for a continuous period of one year or more, subsequent use of such building or land shall be in conformity with the provisions of this chapter. (e) No existing building or premises devoted to a use not permitted i n the district in which such building or premise is located shall be enlarged, reconstructed or structurally altered, unless: (1) Required by law or government order; or (2) There would not be a significant affect, as determined by the city through a special use permit, on the development of the parcel as zoned. ADMINISTRATIVE Procedure --1. Planning Commission recommendation 2. �. City Council holds a public hearing and makes a decision. At least four votes are required for approval. _ jW Ens 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. :losures: Resolution Location Map Property Lin Map Land Use Plan BC Zone 3 a Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council c� 1 Chambers in said City on the day of , 1983 at 7:00 P .m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business commer- cial to R -1, residence district (single dwelling) for the following described property: a the east 115 feet of lot 25, block I-Garden Acres, commonl y known as 1685 White Bear Avenue. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by the Maplewood City Counci 1 , P ursuant to chapter 36, article VII of the Maplewood Code or Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on March 21, 1983. The Planning Commission had no :recommendation to the City Counci -l: , - 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on , 1983 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and Planning n y g Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above. described rezoning be approved on the basis of the followin findings of • g g fact. 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance and Comprehensive Plan, 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood -- and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan i s . adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public wel fare,., Adopted this day of 19830 Seconded by Ayes- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. • _. _ CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) } I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , .1983, with the original on f i l e 1n my office, and the same is a full , true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to .Witness my hand as such Clerk and corporate seal of the City this day of 1983. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 0 t v AVE. F 3� RA AT ?IVAT E ' I RE E T ESSAW AVEI ,AD NC A- = -2640N z EDGEHILL RD. < J 65 Q h = DE MONT AVE. W C ROOK L AVE 2 0 -- AV 11 fA AVE. m SEX Ni A AVE. D VA! RVA) AV 2400 N 4 �ANDVIEW A VE �CUP,T 36 VIKI OR. ASTLE AV SHERREN AVE " ^,. S B3 � . S R E N AVE )PE AVE. ^,1 r COPE AVE. LARK AvE. ~ LARK AVE. LAURIE •R0. LLAURIE RO z w O 25 t z W �� �, z AVE. �5 CAD N B 64 2.160 N oc AVE � � ®U 6KE AVE. ELDRIDG J AVE. a `' 3 ~' MAPLEW800 ;.} ( 1) STANICH CT. v J W PUBLIC WORKS / ELMON T AVE. N 64 ems I SKILLMA JI N m AVE._ NA RIS �LUA. IWOOD AVE. 29 �. 28 LLJ 7r► � ;l o su R 4 W 3 ,00 5 Z � Wakefield �. R I W � > i '� N AVE . OP AVE �' e � -INGST C z 3 .J [ PRICE SAVE t .RI E A J GJv > N O Fin (pf Ir ST. T2lN R Ltw � t LOCATION MAP 0 Attachment Two Q N • e s M z L LA. r. can i 1 t AV ! + } 1C � • - 1 t is 9 i � ; < • v \ � . .' r r Burger King - YI F t c ' - Wondermat # Ga rri ty s Lounge Y <1 1759 1763 Kentucky Fried Chicken • f f M PROPERTY LINE MAP Attachment Three Q N 4- V! 1 0. r. R �• •� S p ^1 .. - 14 LIN Q1 15 ?cu• • 1 7 4 5 �.� :. V % IS.� . . ............................... Zfl J" V V - T 1C+ Q �~ 1709 r t. �- 1699 0 j or AbC is C'� .`.�.� ::; .:• .�!.: i 1 t AV ! + } 1C � • - 1 t is 9 i � ; < • v \ � . .' r r Burger King - YI F t c ' - Wondermat # Ga rri ty s Lounge Y <1 1759 1763 Kentucky Fried Chicken • f f M PROPERTY LINE MAP Attachment Three Q N pr Pon • --- — -- - . _ : • 1 1 is �' • . ........... Rm ma collecto Cit of Saint '* Paui LSC Rm O O I Attachment Four Gladstone NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN i . DIVISION Sl ON 7. BC BUSINESS AND COMM E RCIAL ERC . IAL D1STRlCT Sec. 36 -153. Use regulations. • In a BC Business and Commercial District in the city, the follow- . ing regulations shall apply-. - • t oo _ (1) Permitted uses: A building maybe erected or used, and a lot ' • ' - may be used or _occupied for any of the followi - z p urposes, and'ino otber: .(a) Apdrtment for one:family in combination u th business . - use. - (b) Hotel, motel, tourist borne, rooming house or boardin - - - • house. - - • (c) Retail store, restaurant, ofhce, agency, studio, barik, - • personal ser% ce and craftsmen's shop, mortuary. • - - (d) Automobile sales agency, used car lot, parking garage or • lot, provided all facilities are located and all services are ' • coi;ducted on the lot_ • (e) l� 'Iewspaper publishing, job printing establis}iment M Theater. - - - _(g) Hand or automatic self - service launAry. (h) Bakery or confectionery-shop, for the production of ar- • - ticles be sold only at retail on the premises G) Public garage or motor fuel station; provided that a license to operate sucb business is first obtained from the city council pursuant to chapter 17 of this Cod e- A ll public garages and motor fuel •stations must be so lo- cated on the site and the site • shall 13e of the size as _ provided in section 36 -156 of this division which defines - Mnds of operation, site area required and other data • relating to such business - - (j) Any use of the same general character as any of the • above permitted uses; provided that, no use whicb is noxious or1azardous shall bepermitt & - (2) Special exceptions: The following uses are allowed when authorized by the city council as a special exception: a (a) All uses permitted in R -3 Residence Districts, except the construction of dwelling houses permitted in divi sions 3 and 4 of this article, R -1 and R -2 Residence - Districts. (b) Processing and distributing station for milk or other beverages, carting or hauling station. - (c) Pla of amusement, recreation or assembly, other than a theater, when conducting in _ (d) Yard for storage, sale and distribution of ice, coal, fuel oil or building materials, when enclosed within a fence of not less than six (6) feet in height, but not including junkyard, salvage, automobile or other wrec -ing yard. (Code 1965, J 907.010; Ord. No. 232, § 3,10 -67 Ord. No. 256,11- 20 -69; Ord. No. 402, § I 8- 12 -76) - Y • - - • -_k 0 1 E. Rezoning--1685 White Bear Avenue (Kentucky Fried Chicken" Secretary 01-son said the ro osal is to rezone P P e the property from BC, — to R -1 _ Chairman Prew asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment on the proposal. No one was present. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend to the Ci Co uncil a of t he resolution rezoninq this site to R -1 res i denc district (single dwellin Con nissioner Barrett seconded Discussion as to whether the land use designation and the proposed . p p sed zoning is appropriate for the property. Voting on the motion: Ayes - -Commi ss i oners Fischer, Barrett, Si 9 mund i k Nays—Commissioners Prew, S1 etten , Whitcomb Motion fails, Commission indicated no further action shall be taken and the Council to be advised of this tie vote on the motion. _ o 5 3 -21 -83 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager Acticn b N, FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Rezon i ngs (M-2 to R -3 and R -2) E'l � r - �•�_.....yu�.._.. LOCATION: Maryland Avenue and McKnight Road DATE: March 31, 1983 _ v/Y� ��s+wv.•oc.vcar rJU -..C: s'Y.= 'W:.>..:.•. <. .. ._, • The counci on March 28, did not approve a rezoning from M4 (heavy manufacturing) to R -2 (double dwellings) and R -3 (multiple dwellings). Three cotrnci lmembers were in favor, with one opposed. The reason for the opposing vote was a concern that there are too many multiple dwellings in this area. Leaving the M -2 zone,: leaves several problems unresolved: 1. The Zoning is not consistent with the land use plan. 2. The M -2 zone allows all types of uses, including multiples, commercial and industrial . 3. The residents were in favor of the rezoning, wanting to maintain a residential character to the area. Alternati (i n order of preference) 1. Reconsider councilmember Anderson's proposal at the April 25th meeting. (See attachment one.) This would require a motion from councilmember Juker or four votes to waive the rules of procedure. 2. Reconsider councilmember Juker's proposal at the April 25th meeting. (See attachment two.) 3. Reconsider the Planning Commission's recommendation at the April 25th meeti (See attachment three.) 4. Leave the M -2 zone and initiate a plan amendment to GI, general industrial. A copy of the March 1 staff report is enclosed. mb 3 Alternative Maps 3/1 Staff Report i �v n R1 - _ - * ■ R1 ■ ynr�r ■ s s71� i�r s Ts - � ■ �f ��Ct� tg-'t-" n _ S • - �- e- � : cKn7 ght Road - ; Real i gnment R3 .001 .0011 I .00� .001 f • •s• ._ (PUB) U D) . 10 r .' �• • ii Z r ARE S :. ......... -... .%%%%1.1.'.1.1._.1_* . ........... 1_ -::Y:: ...... . ......... .......... -- _ f t. `• � L � f ••���� :JfT.Y :BEAVER LAK E E =� ST AT .� :ti•f: ES•.= i OI _ �- L �. E HOME .: E P A R K ..` - : =_•: :, :Z :ms`s :• -.�•. ::*.w+ - .- . : :�.`. . lam.•: :' :• :� ':: :vr;:: • .G.i - - •.y . :: :: ....... - v • I- IT .�. •' •rC '. AR E _. 2 . �. •:1 :•:: :':'. •.� - s . ATTACHMENT 1 PROPOSED ZONING (Councilmember Anderson) Area 1 -- Area 2 R -3, Multiple Dwel l i ng R -2, Double Dwelling R1 ■ ..�...... ■ ■ ) ■ ` s �. R � � � � • t om• _01 QTR n7 if i`1t`� i t "i�i wnwww ' ■ u` McKnight Road : _ -: _ • •� , ��, �' .Rea lig nment 2 40 01 R3 oo- • • ., .� . ....... �a�: :: :.�. . : .............. _ P D) t u w • - :� : r -'. A RE A ................ . •;.. . S • •••• ' :.: : :.r te :.'. s.+ i -.'�• ^• ' t • '.� i • .'1 :' •••� DEAVER LAKE ESTATE _. - t S F // r•.. # OBI LE HOME PARK "• ~ :'iii.': i . • '. i ' • y '•' •'.•.�: �.., .� �.�._: - 1 :.": - '� AREA •.t :'.i' 2 _ • : :::•::•:•::: _ :� . .. :J .. . :1% 0 i s ATTACHMENT 2 PROPOSED ZONING (Counci Juker) Area I - R -3 Multiple Area 2 -- i pi a Dwel i ng R -2, Double Dwelling J t it U - � � � ~�_ | " / -A Rj 7 O AF 20, McKni Road 41M 2 Reali R3 fe ____--- 00 (PUD) | ;v =` - ' ^ ATTACHMENT 3 PROPOSED ZONING (Plannin Commission) Area R-3,x Mult iple Dwellin R-1, Sin Dwelling rg r-S MEMORANDUM T / TO: City Manager FROM: Associate P1 anner--Johnson SUBJECT: Rezoning LOCATION: Maryland Avenue and McKnight Road:: == _ AP PLICANT: Council - - OWNERS: Beaver* Lake Estates Perry hortri d e T --._ � y g ony Oswald "- , Vernon Potter Gerald Bruzek, Evelyn Salkowicz, John Johnson, Carl Olsen and Paul Edmiston (See Attachment Three for Parcel Ownershi DATE: March 1, 1983 SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL Request Rezone about 68 acres at the corner of McKnight Road and Maryland Avenue from M -2, Heavy Manufacturing to R -3, Multiple Dwelling, R -2, Double Dwelling and NC, Neighborhood Commercial Proposal 1. This rezoning is part of the city -wide 'downzoni ng" program. (Down- zoning occurs when the zoni ordinance is amended to change a zoning district from a higher to ' a lower intensity use: in this case, from heavy manufacturing to residential use.). 2. Upzoni ng is also proposed for the southerly portion of the six single- dwelling parcels fronting on Maryland Avenue (Attachment Two). The present single- dwelling zoning is being recommended for change to double - dwelling zoning. 3. There are no development proposals for these properties. CONCLUSION Comments The proposed rezonings are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and would be compatible with surrounding development. The existin M -2 zoni would allow heavy 9 9 y manufacturing uses that would not be compatible with existing uses or the Plan. R - 2 zoning is recommended for the ro ert abutti McKn Road a illustra P P Y g g s in Attachment Two. R -2 zoning would permit the existing dwellings to become conform. i ng uses, whereas R -3 zoning would er etuate their resent nonconforming P P P 9 us. e.. status. No improvements can be made to nonconforming use properties without Council approval by special use permit. The commercial of a building di n and truck P 9 trai 1 er storage would become nonconforming if designated as either zone. The residential property abutting the north side of Maryland Av nue and lying w �. y 9 est of the .McKnight Road realignment, as illustrated i n Attachment Two should be upzoned from R -1 to R -2. The existing dwellings would Conti nue as conforming 9 uses. The concern is that their large lots (88 x 475 feet) and present R -1 zoning are inconsistent with the residential medium density for area. - y th � s The northern one -half of the single-dwelling lots fronting on Maryland Avenue, the eastern portion of the large lots fronting on McKni Road and the remaining undeveloped property to the east and north (Attachment Two) should be t coned R -3. This area is irregular in shape; as such, developers should be given the opportunity for cluster development to eliminate excessive street construction. R -3 zoning offers the developer the required amount of site design flexibility, whereas R -2 zoning would not. The Land Use Plan also has a policy calling for the location of multiple dwellings in areas access by collector and arterial roadways. The proposed McKnight Road realignment l s such a roadway. �\ ° N ..+ ' r Recommendation (Requires at least four votes for approval) Refer to Attachment Two: I. Approve the enclosed resolution (Attachment Four) rezoning area two from M-2 to NC. II. Approve the enclosed resolutions (Attachment Five*-- .M -2 to R -3) and (Attachment Six--.R-1 to R -3) , rezoning area one from M -2 and R -1 to R -3. III. Approve the enclosed resolutions (Attachment Seven-- M -2 to R -2) and (Attachment Eight -- R -1 to R -2), rezoning area three from M -2 and R -1 to R-2. r 2 BACKGROUND Site Description Acreage: Approximately 68 Existing Land Use: Beaver Lake Estates Mobile Home P On • ark, six dwel 1 i ngs ( one dwelling includes a pole building -U0 undevel o land ped r Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Bulk Storage facility and undeveloped p land, planned and zoned industrial ndustrial use East: Undeveloped land, planned for residential • medium density. A Planned unit development for Maple Greens has be for their site. been approved South: Maryland Avenue an �� • d six single - dwelling lots, Across Maryland Avenue, county open space and P P the proposed Beaver Lake Hills s planned unit development West: McKnight Road. Across McKnight Road are ' 9 e single dwellings in St. Paul Past Actions 6 -6 -68: Council approved a special use ermi t for th Mobile P e Beaver Lake Estates Home Park, 9- 13 -73: Council denied a zone change from M -2, Heavy Manufacturing to R -1, Single Dwelling for 2325 East Maryland Avenue and referred ' e red the question of • rezoning a larger area to the Planning Commission. 1 -9 -75: Council gave first reading to a rezoning from - 9 M -2, Heavy Manufacturing to R -1, Single Dwelling for the six lots north of Maryland and Av y enue (map two) . Due to citizen zen opposition, Council declined a 12 -2 -74 Plannin Commission recommen- g hears hearings for the rezoning dati on to initiate "public g of . the complete area between Maryland, McKnight,* the 9 , , mobile e home park, and the Bulk Service, Inc. property and that such heari should consi der the reasons-for bri n ' zoning for the area i n g� ng the 9 to al i gnment of the use proposed under the Com reh ensi ve Pl (Residential Medi Density) f or the Cit of Maplewood." P 1 -16-75: Second reading of the s i - s - zone change request was defeated for lack of four votes i n favor. . • 4--20-78: Council approved a zone change from M -2 to - - shown R 1 for the six -lot area _ w on map two i n response to a lawsuit t brought against the city, 8 -6 -82: An administrative lot division was a • approved for Mr. Perry Shortr�dge to create the triangular parcel to the southwest of the mobi - ' mobile home park, lying east . of the McKnight realignment. The applicant indicated a d e2 re for commer- cial use of this property. 0 - 3 0 DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS Planning 1. Land Use Plan designation: R.M. Residential Medium Density and LSC Limited Service Commercial (proposed in a separate reporty. __ = 2. Zoning: M -2; ' Heavy Manufacturing T 3. Policies Criteria from Plan, page 18 -2: "Zoning maps should be updated as necessary to make both land use maps and zoning maps compatible." 4. Compliance with Land Use Laws: Section 36 -485 states that "In any instance where the city council or the planning commission is required to. consider an exception or change in this chapter, including the zoning map, in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, the council or planning commission c on shat 1, among ocher things: (1) Assure itself that the proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of this chapter. (2) Determine that the proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring p roperty or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the proDerty adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. (3) Determine that the proposed change will serve the ' best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the P ubl i c welfare." Citizen Comments The three persons with 'single dwellings fronting on Maryland Avenue that are recommended for rezoning to R -2 were notified. The owners of 2335 and 2345 responded. 2345 had no objection to the proposal . 2335 thought R -2 to the north of his property would be more compatible with the existing dwellings. Procedure 1. Planning Commission recommendation 20 City Council decision, following a public hearing mb Enclosures 1. Beaver Lake Neighborhood Land Use Plan 2. Proposed Zoning - 3. Existing Zoning /Affected Property Owners _4. Eight resolutions 4 _ f w. McKnight Road Realignment VOW lk,&:; .4 cz Maryland Avenue 4� C rQ w ... IAU- r wt •1 �' �{ Sc ++ maicr s r! c ri saw ti i i f R dft i s v C 'L7 ' C , = • m 1 Sc Rm A 94600� r "w E O Sc . ATTACHMENT 1 Bearer Lake NEIGHGOZlf00D LAND USE P! AM (LSC designation is proposed in a separate report) N T M2 a t R1 ■ 0� 000� R3 0%.-. 4bf%AW.*.Q% •• ' .. • quo •4..1 r- 1 ._ . . ....... Ali i i� i • • s . • n r i� �T1 « �nr� is �7s � —. - - —1; r'_ 4 • ` : '.- . • • r •• 2 1 y ._..• - - Proposed Realignment of •' �� McKnight Ro a ct_ �••' • +i' �• 10 d0o' i �• -- . 1 •• • • •• • de M / s 2 .0' ■ ------- • ••� ( PU B) • ..:: 1r i i r l r r if tV� K • • 'v is •••''� •. • 11 �:l •. •. :. :ti• ' - AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS • (1) Beaver Lake Estates (6) Carl Olsen (2325 Maryland Ave.) Mobi It Hoge Park • (7) Russel Nieigocki (2) Tony Oswald t 3 Per Shortrid ( Evelyn Salkowict (1240 McKnight Rd.; () 9� Or (9) Gerald Brurek (1250 McNi.ght Rd.) • (4) Paul Edmiston (235 Maryland Ave.) • (10) Vernon Potter (1262 McKnight Rd.) (5) John Johnson (2335 Maryland Ave s B. Zone Change -- McKnight Road and Maryland Avenue. c 9 -- 9,5 Secretary Olson said the proposal is 'to rezone about 68 acres from M -2, Heavy Manufacturing to R -3, Multiple Dwelling and R -2, Double Dwelling and NC, Neighborhood Commercial. Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment. Gerald Bruzik, 1250 N. McKnight, asked where a roadway wGul_d go for the property in back of his home.. Secretary Olson said it would depend on how the property—Would be _developed. Mr. Bruzik said he would l i k e the property to stay single — family residential . Vern Potter, 1262 N. McKnight, asked if he would have to remove his existing storage building, Staff indicated the building would not have to be removed. It would be a nonconforming use which would mean the use could be continued, but not expanded or sold or any other type of manufacturing use. Mr. Potter said he is thinking of constructing another building, He wished the. property to remain zoned light manufacturing. John Johnson, 2335 E. Maryland, said he did have the area rezoned to R -1 so he could construct a home on the property. He suggested the proposed alignment of McKnight serving as a buffer zone and he would also agree with the R -2 zoning but not the R -3. The Commission discussed the possibility of having a zoning district less than R -3 on the west side of the McKnight Road Alignment and having the R -3 and NC zoning on the easterly side of the alignment. Staff indicated they were trying to maximize. the development possibilities for the property owners so they would get the maximum return on their property. The Commission also questioned if the Manufacturing zoned property could just be changed to a residential district without designating single or multiple. They also discussed what effect a higher residential zone would have on property taxes. Commissioner Prew moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the area under_ cons ideration tie rezoned as fol -lows: 1. Area 1, which would refer to all properties east of the proposed new alignment of McKnight Road, except for what is now called area 2,woul d be rezoned to R -3 Multiple Dwelling. I 2. Area 2, which would consist of the piece of property at the intersection between the mobi l.e home park and proposed McKnight alignment as shown on the staff memorandum, would be NC, Neighborhood Conmxrcial. 3. Area 3, which would be all remaining parts, which would be all parts west of the proposed McKnight Road al i gnment would be rezoned_ as n R -1, Residence District (Single Dwel 1 i ng) . Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl , Barrett, Ellefson, Fischer, Hejny, Pell ish, Prew, Whitcomb. f MEMORANDUM t -, TO: City Manager FROM: Associate P1 anner -- Johnson ;.- SUBJECT: Code Amendment- - Neighborhood Commercial Di strict DATE • March 3, 1983 .� s i •_ e ~ INTRODUCTION D ``�`' Request Establish a neighborhood commercial zone that is specifically designed for location within or adjacent to a residential district. Reasons for Change 1. The present commercial zones ( see reference information) which permit retail trade are too intensive for location within or adjacent to a residential neighborhood. 2. If a compatible neighborhood use vacates an overly intensive zoned site, there is a potential that a use incompatible with the neighborhood will find the site desirable. 3. As part of the city's downzoni ng program, staff recognized that no exist- i ng commercial zone is appropriate for: a) the northwest corner of Mary- land Avenue and the McKnight Road realignment, b) the Maplewood Plumbing property at English Street and Larpenteur Avenue, and c) McMenemy Street and County Road B. - Obj ectives To create a commercial zoning district permitting retail trade that is specifi- cally intended for: 1. Location on smaller tracts of land within or adjacent to a residential neighborhood. 2. Pedestrian and bicycle access 3. Businesses which cater to the daily needs of nearby neighborhood residents (e. g. a grocery store, barber shop, small restaurant, etc.) . CONCLUSION Anal ys i s The opportunity for neighborhood convenie retail shopping should be preserved. However, l on the size and types of these uses must be i crr used to ensure compatibility with nearby residential uses, y i The present zoning code does not offer a commercial zoning district which includes retail uses that would ensure compati bi l i ty with a residential setting. The attached neighborhood commercial ordinance i s proposed to meet thi s need. The Maplewood Plumbing site at Larpenteur Avenue and English Street is an example of the problem that can arise. In this case, business commercial zoning was granted for an insurance office and apartment which were never constructed. A 7 -11 store was constructed a few years later, eventually being replaced by the present use which, although a permitted bus i nes s . commercial use, is overly intensive and out -of- character with= -he residential _setting. 7A similar situation could result if the Brooks Superette , at HTcMenemy Street and County Road B, were to vacate the premises. Recommendation (Four votes requi red for adoption) Adopt the enclosed ordinance establishing a NC -- Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District. 2 REFERENCE INFORMATION Existing Commercial Zoning Districts 1. BC, Business Commercial - -the broadest of the commercial districts. The permitted uses i nzl ude auto related businesses, o 'ices , retail and all types of restaurants. (See Attachment A.) m= r . 2. SC, Shopping Center--similar 1 ar to the BC District, except stations and _ auto sales are not permitted. (See Attachment B.) 3. BC (M) , Business Commercial (Modified)--similar to the SC district, except restaurants are conditional uses subject to no drive -up window facilities. , This is intended as a transition from intensive commerical to residential (See Attachment C.) 4. CO, Commercial Office -- intended to abut a residential district. Emphasis is on professional and administrative o ffi cps . Low intensity commercial uses . are permitted when secondary to an office use or by conditional use permit , if , f free - standing. (See Attachment D.) 5. LBC, Limited Business Commercial W-- similar to the CO district, except retail businesses are not permitted. The district is intended to abut residential districts. All uses are subject to council approval. (See Attachment C.) Past Actions Larpenteur Avenue and English Street Site 12 -3 -64: The site was rezoned from F -farm residence to BC, business commercial for an insurance office and apartment building, 1974: A 7 -11 store opened on the site. 1978: Following the vacation of the site by 7 -11, council denied 'a license for a tavern due to neighborhood opposition. Maplewood Plumbing nd Heating 9 moved in shortly thereafter. Sur ve The 3000 square foot maximum area is proposed on the basis that the Brooks Superette, at McMenemy Street and County Road B, is approximately 3000 square feet. This structure is a good example of the size structure intended in this district. Procedures 1. Planning Commission recommendation 2. City Council: First reading - .Second reading and adoption (requires at feast four votes for adoption) JW Enclosures Proposed Ordinance Attachments A -D DIVISION 5A. NC NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT e Sec. 36 -126. Intent, The i ntent of this district is to reserve land for the e use of businesses that are compatible with adjacent residential land uses.. Uses are limited to offices and smaller retail uses that cater to convenience s�o in . Pedestrian and bicycle access pP g . sec. 36 -127. Permitted uses, any of the following uses provided that the fl area of all buildings in any one NC shall not exceed 3000 square feet: 1. Bakery or candy shop for the production of goods sold on the p remises 2. Beauty parlor or barber shop 3. Dry cleaner or Laundromat. All odors must be controlled so as not to be noticeable to adjacent residents. 4. Office or medical and dental clinics 5. Repair shop, except for motorized vehicles. No work shall be erformed outside of -the building, p 6. Drug, hardware or grocery store 7. Studio 8. Tailor or dressmaker shop 9. Veterinary or grooming Clinic where there are no outsi :kennels or storage.. Sec. 36 -128. Accessory uses. 1. Off- street parking 2. Signs, in accordance with the sign ordinance _ Sec. 36 -129. Conditional uses (requires council approval), pp . } Any of the following uses provided that the fl area of all buildings in any one NC zone shall not exceed 8,000 square feet: 1. Any permitted use listed in section 36 -127 20 Club, lodge or hall 3 Private school, daycare center or community service use t 4. Taxi stand or bus stop. 5. Restaurant where there are no drive -up order windows or. servi n 9 of food to patrons i n their automobiles, es . All cooking - 9 odors must be controlled so as not to be noticeable to adjacent . res i dents . 4 6. Similar uses to those listed i n this section Sec. 36 -130. District standards. (a) Bike racks Bike racks shall be provided in an area that is convenient to each ..major building entrance, but which will not disrupt pedestrian or vehicular traffic or fire lanes. (b) Building design Buildings in this district shall be their surrounding land uses. If mo shall be planned and organized-as a able to walk between stores without There shall be no exterior storage, which shall be screened as required code. designed to be compatible with re than one use on a site, they unit. Pedestrians should be crossing vehicular traffic lanes. other than a trash receptacle by Section 36 -26 of the zoning (c) Lot coverage At least'15% of the site shall be landscaped. (d) Building setbacks (1) The minimum building setback from a right -of -way shall be thirty feet and twenty feet from side and rear property lines. (2) Where a setback is from residentially zoned property, the minimum required setbacks shall be increased, not to exceed 75 feet, subject to the most restrictive of the following requirements: a. Building height: The building setbacks shall be increased two feet for each one foot the building exceeds 25 feet in height. b. Exterior wall area: Where an exterior wall faces a residentially - zoned property, the wall setback shall be increased five feet for each 1,.000 square feet, or part thereof, in excess of 2,000 square feet. (e) Parking and loading areas w Paved areas shall be provided for 1 oadi ng and unloading of delivery- trucks and other vehicles servicing of shops by refuse collection, fuel , fire, and other service vehicles; automobile accessways; and pedestrian walks. (f) Plan review -_ Plan approval is required from the Community Design Review Board. The city may require appropriate conditions to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses to include, but not be limited to, building height, setbacks, orientation, -parking lot location or location of building. entrances or screening, 5 ATTACHMENT A DIVISION 7. BC BUSINESS AND COhWERCIAL DISTRICT Sec. 36 -15.3. Use regulations. In a BC Business and Commercial District in the i - c ty, the follow - ing regulations shall apply. . (1) Permitted uses;A building maybe erected or use and a lot. . . may be used or occupied, for, any of the followingpurposes, and no other. (a) Apirtment for one - family in combination %%ith busin ess use. - (b) Hotel, motel, tourist home, rooming house or boardipg. - house, - •' (c) Retail store, restaurant, ofIice, agency, studio ban personal service and craftsmen's shop, mortuary. (d) Automobile sales agency, used car lot, parking garage or . lot, provided all facilities are located and all services are cor;'ducted on the lot. • (e) Newspaper publishing, job printing establishment. (f1 Th eater. _(g) Hand or automatic self- service launAr Y_ (h) Bakery or confectionery shop, for the production of ar- ticles to be sold only at retail on the premises. G) Public garage or motor -`uel station; provided that a Iicense to operate such business is first obtained from the city council pursuant to chapter 17 of this Code. Ali public garages and motor fuel stations must be so lo- cated on the site and the site shall be of the size as provided in section 36 -156 of this division which defines kinds of operation, site area required and other data relating to such business. - • Any use of the same general character as an y of the above permitted uses; provided that, no use which is noxious or hazardous shall be permitted. (2) Special exceptions: The following uses are allowed when authorized by the city council as a special exception: (a) All uses permitted in R -3 Residence Districts except p the construction of dwelling houses permitted in divi- sions 3 and 4 of this article, R -1 and R -2 Residence Districts. (b) Processing and distributing station for milk or t o her beverages, carting or hauling station. • (c) Place of amusement, recreation or assembly, other than a theater, when conducting indoors. (d) Yard for storage, sale and distribution of ice coal fuel oil or building materials, when enclosed wither a fence ' of not less than six (6) feet in height, but not..ttncludin junkyard, salvage, automobile or other wreckti g yard. (Code 1965, § 907.010; Ord. No. 232, § 3,10-19-67; Ord. No. 256,11- 20 -69; Ord. No. 402, I 8- 12 -76) i ATTACHMENT B DIVISION 8. SC SHOPPING CENTER DISTRICT Sec. 36 -173. Use regulations. In an SC Shopping Center District in the 64, a buildin combination of buildings may be erected or used, and the lot area may be used or occupied for any of the following purposes, and no other, but in no case shall a building be used for living quarters: (1) Retail store, including retail outlet showroom for uses per- mitted in subparagraph (9) hereof, but not includin g auto - mobile sales agency; provided that, no goods shall be dis- played on the exterior of the premises. (2) Restaurant, tea room or cafeteria. (3) Office agency or studio. (4) The following personal service shops dealing directly with customers; beauty parlor, barber shop, clothes cleaning agen- cy, automatic pelf- service laundry, dressmaking, millinery or similar shop; provided that all repair or processing work is conducted in accordance with subparagraph (9) below. (5) Theater, not including outdoor motion picture establishment, assembly hall, or community building, indoor recreational establishment or library, child day center. _ (6) Bakery, confectionery or custom shop for the production of articles to be sold at retail on the premises; provided that, all baking or processing is conducted in accordance with sub- paragraph (9) below. (7) Bank. (8) Passenger station. (9) The following uses; provided that, if such uses are located on the ground floor; they shall not be located within twenty -five (25) feet of the front of the building; and further provided that, they shall be effectively screened from the front portion of the building by a wall or partition: a. General servicing or repair. b. Upholstering. c. Carpentry or woodworking. d. Electrical, radio, television repair. e. Hand laundering, dry cleaning or pressing, providing no inflammable fluids are used. L Tailoring, dressmaking or repair. g. Millinery repair or processing. h. Baking, confectionery making or similar processing. i Frozen food lockers. _ j. Any similar use involving -repair, processing r storage e g activity. (10) Accessory use customarily incidental to any of the above uses. (11) Any use of the same general character as an y of the above permitted uses, when authorized as a special exception by the city council; provided that, such use shall be P ermitted subject to such reasonable restrictions as the city council may determine; and further provided that, no trade or busi- ness shall be permitted which is either noxious or hazardous. ATTACHMENT C Sec. 36 -154. LBC Limited Business Commercial District, The LBC Limited Business Commercial District is hereby estab- e , Iished and may be authorized by the council in those locations where a regular BC Business Commercial District abuts a residen- tial district, the intent of - this provision being to make possible a . modified commercial area in the nature of a buffer zone aTherein the uses, subject to prior council approval, will be limited to piofes- s onal offices and such other similar uses as the council may deter- = y -. mine. The proposed plan of use in any such LBC limited business commercial district shall be submitted to the council for final de- termination and approval. (Code 1965, § 907.010; Ord. No. 2 3 2 10 § 3, 10- 19 -67; Ord. No. 256,11- 20 -69; Ord. No. 402, § 1, 8- 12 -76) Sec. 36 -155. BC(M) Commercial District (Modified). i 1. INTENT. The BC (M), Business Corunercial- Modified District is intended to provide for the orderly transition between more intensive co=ercial uses and low or medium density residential areas. Restrictions on, but not limited to, building height, setbacks, orientation, parking lot location, or cation of building entrances may be required to ensure compatibility Wit abutting residential uses. 2. USE REGULATIONS. A building may be-erected or used, and a lot may be used or occupied, for any of the following purposes, and no other: a. Retail store; professional administrative offices; bank or savings and loan; personal service, craftsmen's shop, mortuary b. Hotel or motel C. Walk-in theatre ' d. Job printing shop e. Bakery or candy shop producing goods for on- premises retail sales. f. Any use of the same general character as any of the above permitted uses, as determined by the City Council, provided that no use vhicb is noxious or hazardous shall be permitted. 3. The following uses When authorized by the City Council by means of a special use permit: a. All uses permitted in R -3 Multiple Dwelling Districts, except the con- struction of houses permitted in R -1 and R -2 districts. r b. Laundromat or similar automatic self -- service laundr - ' • iestaurant, e. where there are no drive -up order windows or serving of food to patrons in their automobiles. All cooking odors must be controlle so as not to be noticeable to adjacent residences.. d. Place of amusement, recreation, or assembly, other than a theater, where there are no outdoor activities. ATTACHMENT D DIVISION 6. CO COMMERCIAL OFFICE DISTRICT Sec. 36 -136. Purpose and intent. (a) The CO Commercial Office District is established primarily to provide areas for the development of professional aneadminis- trative offices, related uses together with supportive, low,intensit y r commercial uses in locations in close proximity to residential areas where such uses can conveniently serve the public, and to create a suitable environment for such uses and buildings specially designed for their purposes, located on sites large enough to provide room for appropriate separation of uses, landscaped open spaces and off - street parking facilities. (b) This district is intended to be located primarily on heavily traveled streets or adjacent to commercial or industrial districts, and is designed to lessen the impact of these uses on residential areas. (Ord. No. 380, § 100,1- 16 -75) Sec. 36 -137. Permitted uses. In a commercial office district, unless otherwise provided in this chapter, no building or use of land shall be erected, structurally altered or expanded, except for one or more of the following uses: (a) Professional offices; (b) Administrative offices; (c) Medical and dental offices and clinics; (d) Financial offices, stock brokerages, banks and savings and loans, real estate offices and other general business offices; (e) Related commercial uses: - Incidental services, such as restaurants, pharmacies and retail sales which serve primarily the occupants and pa- trons of the permitted office use, when conducted within the same building. Related commercial uses shall not ex- ceed twenty -five (25) percent of the total net floor area of the building. (f) Supportive commercial uses: The following free standing uses may be permitted upon approval by the city council of a special exception: Spe- cialty or gift stores, office supply, ticket agency, travel service, opticians and similar uses. The uses provided for in this paragraph may be the sole use of a particular property or building, or may, be combined with any per- mitted or conditional uses allowed in the district, upon compliance with the necessary special exception or spe- • cial use procedures. (Ord. No. 380, 101,1- 16 -75) Sec. 36 -138. Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted in a CO District subsequent Wt _ review and approval of a special use permit: (a) Medical and dental laboratories, not including the manufac- ture of pharmaceutical or other products for general sales and distribution; (b) Public and quasi - public uses appropriate to the district, such as hospitals, convalescent hospitals, and professional, busi- ness and technical schools; (c) Public utility and service buildings, structures and uses a - P propriate to the district: It is the intent of this paragraph to provide for uses which _ supply public or quasi - public services which are of a sub- stantially automated nature or require only periodic main- tenance,. such as water pumping stations, telephone relay or` - switching facilities and similar uses. It is not intended that office facilities, maintenance dispatching depots or any use which generates regular daily use or traffic would fall within this definition. (d) Restaurants: In keeping with the intent and purpose of the C district, a restaurant use does not include a drive -in or any res- taurant commonly referred to as "fast food" or "fran- chise" wherein the emphasis is on automobile oriented clientele or where any sizeable proportion of the total activity is involved in takeout orders intended for con -. sumption other than within the building. Questions of the applicability of this definition to an individual pro- posal shall be reviewed by the planning commission, which shall forward a recommendation to the city council for final determination. (e) Any other office use which is determined to be the same general character as the above uses. (ord. No. 380, § 102, 1- 16 -75) 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Code Amendment: NC District Secretary Olson said the Planning Commission reviewed this at the previous meeting. Staff made the suggested revisions to the ordinance. 4 ' The Commission suggested adding to section 36 -12 a statement saying conditional use permits require City Council approval Also add after #1 of Section 36 -129 "in Section 36-127." An a4di ti oval statement should be added to Section 36 -127, #3 to require control of all odors from the operation of the business. The Commission also discussed with staff areas where this new zoning district could be used. They also discussed the different types of uses permitted by the zoning district. The Commission also indicated restaurants should only be permitted with a conditional use permit. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council adopt the ordinance as amended establishing a Neighborhood Commercial (NC) zoning district. Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes -- Commissioner Axdahl, Barrett, E1- lefson, Fischer, Hejny, Pel l ish, Prew, Whitcomb. 10. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS A. February 28 Council Meeting B. Commission Representative- -March 14 Council Meeting 11, STAFF PRESENTATIONS 12, ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 9:55 p.m. r to 6 3-7-83 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager • FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Inventory of Potential R -1 to R -3 Rezoni ngs _DATE: March 17, 1983 Randy Johnson from our office prepared the enclosed inventory of undeveloped sites that are zoned F. farm residence or R -1, residence district (single dwelling) and designated on the land use plan for multiple dwelling develop- ment. Enclosed is a city map of all the site and property line maps of specific sites. Council requested this inventory on February 14 after establishing a mora- torium on R -1 to R -3; multiple rezoni ngs . jw Encl osures �s - County Road D = a •; -gp�►� - - 1 � 1 .irl � •v'h h t � � y� { L t� bug it Mt o r r � i d c 1:.• w - q � (.4 -0 ts.u.a •P lot -_ Beam venue "o: l]T` - "'`..w- w •*�. A �♦ E if I ',; • lalot. ♦fir � : � .Mr\ I MM' MM {f♦ I� SITE 1 SITE 2 —_ - _-- y County Road D ri J �" -� l� - -- ' • -- -- ►.. 't i ce' ^ ' -"'-� `rr _ .. _ .� ` ' �- _ - • _ Lj tip • --- ; � ' � T 't �`° �_ � .- - -�.~ -- - - ••�, v U ri 0 0 3 N Z t ti SITES 1 & 2 4 N 4 -ROAD SITE 3 w -V ®r —I , - RI p M APL : • b ps ••_ Q � .e � � _ • � ■ - - - - 4 L F, Nis Woodl INK KA I -a f %sle off --I RV� > 6 115 SO go a lu + -t Z Jo F 2 lk &,Ws a A&--L Y D A. i - W'. vir v? Ar AL= 4. L C'C ft -W r i --=am Ar to qk Im -6 -9 � -,�-- .rte. , � . ., --.= ..� `' -" � � , S -! r f It Amwwr vw Count Road D n M :1 - 4; ;ftJ*am-w=ww *=sun F Sc i • 49 dP 40 w M4 rl* `_ ! 0 SITE 4 - - -- -jam- - �--- �_.._..- ��----- '- -- -- - - --�` - - - -- � • - - ^ ^- ��,�s,. :�__ : --s�.� Woodlynn 3,e F B C 3 4; ;ftJ*am-w=ww *=sun F Sc i • 49 dP 40 w M4 rl* `_ ! 0 SITE 4 - - -- -jam- - �--- �_.._..- ��----- '- -- -- - - --�` - - - -- � • - - ^ ^- ��,�s,. :�__ : --s�.� Woodlynn LLI Jn_ -• 5 •• ........................ arm-, Beam Avenue • • _ _ '' SITE 5 -- �-•• • dOJw _ � � � J j f f-. dC . ,• ` 3 ttt: sC`ie` a •.� f + 111 c 11 ` l 1 � A � ii 1 e.• • 4.� • as t j �l� . ♦ v - .. 19- � = -- - Ra da tz J a- -mss- �.`�-t�•- ���• �:�- -� - � G . - a 2 sue. RI 111 , I 1 `i _ !� � L - • f e /•� � � � ` , f-• . •tea �4 ; [� a ` . �' ►t 17 1 -•y .. .¢ y.�.. • •• • r. i M Y ! a IVs o >•4 •�� = s = V DUMB V • + = 4- • f i • .•. •r 1 a + a Tp O1. F • h SITE 6 y r ,� I E. r c i •i •+ a AVE L'Bc + i 1 { r , ♦�- Ge 1 " wa as a UP .�� �► Y ��.�c� '• a� o ff f _ i E 1 • r. � � SITES 5 & 6 - 112 In - -. --n, — Count Road C . r ,,a ...... 71A Novo IF -was 7 -,� -- SR I --.. ��- -.--.- Town and Count Mobile' Home Park • ONNtAi I AVL b 4) 3 -M I 13 x err V: W oar t 41--4 IN *." I 0 -, 2 B C If 1W salaam woman so m I ! 4 ;- �_• • 4 444. 7J rN R 7ft o ourtor r -couNOR AVC 4L W sr is a a a 14 U � O� ; • I j 4�.416* Limit. of - ti i SITE 7 ' " 1, 6 2 OILZ i�z l p li Ll Io 4 ,1 t has OF kA Ld M, ri r v,3 12 Ll a n a dIC— So- fi F Z—. t ij lAl Roselawn I ` un ' ������,�� �L°zuncorm �ocm� ' ~ _^` � } -. SITE 8 Frost 1A. •s P aul Tourist Cabins A ll L ADO T. LIJ La �/ . , 5 • UJ cr 1 - +- Aj t • , ... 44 R ...._ JO ti ¢ 7y glop 1 S SITE 9 4 N SITE 10 ! l s r� Cope avenue a 0 103103 _ l ipp , AP ,_ 1 I • I 1 , � ( , I , �� _ 1 t 1' 1'•) f I'• i ( I i t 01 1 i L - AIV `I � 1 � , � � { f 1 ` � + t 1 ` t 1 s + I t .r �� f f � vL.. --t � • � , .'• `, . _ • �, � � I I I � i � " � i t 1:. - v+; - - a:.. I issue � t ss — _ 2_- -- N 4� f E IM ` �,1- .I f 1 ' 1 S �•� tali.. L5 -E100t IDIST INC thy+ i1_ I I 1 I •�: ' 1 1.� w ��a r,l;.� +•• Iy �l� •I �',..�' !p � �, ! I � � i + ', ` �: �1 I + : n;a� L SITE 10 1 + _ 4P _ - r Highway 36 -r • cz -of. ... try -&.: ,o. s,r &.Z CM 7C- lee SITE 11 - �� -- �, _ -- - = 4 - -" - ITT S & Z i_.i_...__ i • 1 - :� :- .��_ .° -• - r -- -- -�� -•'- �- _ � _ � � - - - - - - -- - --rte . - - _ -- J f � t "'' cam... "—•► , { I -- I - t • i � •t , W 0 , z j tom_ I /• 1 . • 19 SAO � r _ • ` St • _ • - ',. Y. -- fr--; z T • ` r --- --- Al — ' - L L uj oil 14 go- •--+. .► -.r• --+ 3 ,. . .- Y , la � ...,�,.. •lam t� rl • � w �7 wL. r. .: 12�1lIf ! 1tI S & w. �. ♦f,t IF4 61& 1 LJ - 4 —wo , fA ,� •r It a L•�' 1� t'Ic 1s 14 �. \N 9 I N -� "-, f --- ---- -, f-- ----1 4 n SITE 12 SITES 11 & 12 N SITE 13 4 N (PU D) Archer Hei ghts j e Oil - --.-- = — — r .f of � ` - s ; : � •• � ( •� — — - — - . Fwl 3 •` � t •l �M Ne1 � � f •r Larpenteur Avenue . - 4 N ] / � = TT— rA I Lai an fd lei ^ ^ 4000p .000 jti4 4c Beaver Lak e states R,,3 Ap RI M 2 I RI R i L Jv M 2 M 2 IW 10OW a. -mop 7-A 1p- SITE 14. i t j4 1 dl& • NJ AV Co t Jiff..r 0 F2�1 3 dO' A I AV' GEJ: "LA AJ' R VA CATED 4-t9- - %oc. ?Or?! J i3 eke � '� � � � �_ to nounsaftem *Banana IA SC HC VY SITE 15 SITE 15 ry LO 166,11-1 A A ., , . � � � , 16,,16,, �' . �• �; c; t'� � 1616 .: ,,: 1616 r 1 L ts a la a is 93 13 im Mat. 4 Ufl t oo ON Ll j 7 P- 5 qj !-, 1616 � • • Lbr BUSH i � -�.�• `. t_'` � � � ~ � � , 1616 ;: - i _1616.._. �� ' '� .� 9 8 �. ��� j ' ► �� �•+ � � � � � 1 f 1616. �, � . �' t,►, P' � � � ( � :1616 . - /JJJyyy � 1 I --M I N N E H A H A AV SITE 17 Mi nnehaha Avenue or ` � 0 ! .,;, i �• � 1 1 , � P -wd r3 ■ 3 2 ice' � •' - � ' �7t I 1 � i © � � � ri � f ' ! •1616 +• 1 �.!�. � � i � � _ - � 1/1 � 16+16 � 1616 � 1 a - --- -- -- C71 lot 13 U o R cu 3 1 ---T-- or qw— 40 �R ��, t • 3 ■ • M 3 jp cRI ' • � � � � 1 � � . • � _ 16,16 - -. _ - - " - - - --. + .�.� 1616 -T�r a�•v.. - � } - ir. •. j ' f �, ' r r 1 � __1616_._ __ � �' ► ' t' •. � � � � � t ' 1 ♦ �I ' ■ �� � ` = � ri � . _ - � .i f'•^�+•+• --- . _ • - . - . - - 1616.. J,�. . r .._I..�1 F j 1616 � 4 SITES 16 & 17 SITE 16 4 ` .• RE Lower Afton Road M e � • 1 1 .1 L � '04 iY_i It Li • PU 131 THRU 4 3, APARTMENT OWNERSHIP NO. 50 `- CONNEMARA -- -- - - ----- -- _ _ T—.– ---LAN Mapl ewood,.To' nhouses r o f-il 1�► ! • PUD I A IZ3 f• 9 7 » _ PUD I J 1 1 1 1 • lan ���� », -- - Ma d -- - - ---- - im is � alm u � � Pam f� �r r��- - - --. - ---- -- - Road _ I L ' � ♦ * �� 6 ``' �T a B 9 IO - t _ W JAI 24 4 5 3 .. 12 5 4 N FOR PARK 1 db •� _ t 1 • _ • 1,N 1. A �J C) , � • �` IL� • _ ►, t ►� Ito fit -F Y T umv 1 o .� i� Y 1 MEMORANDUM - ;- TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Holloway Avenue Reconstruction, Plan Modification, Proj_-ect No. 81 -12 DATE: March 31, 1983 During the April 15, 1982 public hearing, the Maplewood City Council did resolve to =increase the scope of the project to include sidewalk along the southern boulevard between Margaret Street and Century Avenue. This addition resulted from the requests made at the meeti by the residents. Since the public hearing, g, several engineering-related items have become apparent concerning the location of the sidewalk as follows: 1. The main generators of pedestrian traffic are the residential subdivisions and park property situated on the north side of Holloway. 2. Subsurface soils investigations, in the vaci ni ty of the Ramsey County Open Space land, revea 1 soils that are subject to settlement. Correction of these soils would be costly. 3. N. W. Bell Telephone is proposing to install six 4 -inch diameter underground conduits along on • g • g the southern boulevard between Parkway Drive and Sterling Street. This installation could cause future "dig -ups" of any adjacent sidewalk if maintenance of the conduit is needed. The amount of sidewalk constructed adjacent to the conduit should therefore be minimized. We are, therefore, recommending to the City Council that the additional sidewalk be constructed along the north boulevard between Margaret Street. and Century Avenue and that based on the concerns represented by the local residents, that sidewalk also be extended along the southerly boulevards of the properties east of Margaret street. The southerly sidewalk, however, should be terminated at the westerly lot l i n e of the Open Space Property. We feel that this recommended alignment will satisfy the needs of the general public y g and the concerns of the local res i dents . The City of North St. Paul, Ramsey County and residents concure with this proposal. mb T- Z. MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: City Manager Director of Public Works Sterling Street, Holloway to Larpenteur April 7, 1983 A letter from a resident from the area requests the City reconsider its position on Sterling Street maintenance. Two items are addressed. The first concerns erection of barricades on Sterling Street at Ripley. Since Holloway Avenue is under construction thus summer, erection of the barricades can be postponed to provide access. Construction should be finished thi s summer, after that time the barricades w i l l be installed. The second issue concerns maintenance of the street surface north of Ripley Avenue. Subsequent to last year's consideration of this matter, it has been determined that according to the City Code, Maplewood is totally responsible for the maintenance of Sterling Street. With this in mind, it seems reasonable that Sterling Street from Holloway to Ripley be considered as part of this year's street overlay program. As soon as the spring thaw is complete, identification of the overlay program will begin. l It is recommended that Sterling Street be considered for the overlay program, but that approval be given at such time as the entire program is presented to the City Council. 3 -a a- 16 -3� Co e..) /,.) c- A, y Ca ti S i ,D x"72 r� i U ti o.� a i 5 5 v� �•,� ,� E G /1-01, -' �' S 5 T�gEWO L..o / JV g s h4:C 40 4> OIL ief 77:!3 Cam- f iV /�G- ev- e AC /0)e 7`Z::> '� ,.r� �r r�� .'-"' - ' e J F : ,009 C 9C 710 7W e' 6 IL L%..7 e�O<-.O 44rloe- 4 0 /99 000�D r i � tioV Ti�N 09 s ,O i s GvS S e I A ?� eAd e P--- Al? Oz a c- zr rg::!!�. c--) lip A-o� /,5.-S v w � 5 7'e A C. c?` co T iv jo tq ti %Mow '009 -w -7 S' 3 _ c5 c 5 7` OP-.- t 57— TC / f p t'tO J''F co S ,- C' __.. 000 D S �t 7 L i ,p S/Oym- 5; C.) Z— J 6 PC it �s STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND PUBLIC GROUNDS 1 29-179 Sec. 29 -177. Definitions. For the purposes of this article, the following words, ,terms and phrases shall have the following meanings respectively ascribed to them by this section: Borderline streets: The term "borderline streets" shall mean streets located along the contiguous common borderlines of the City f Maplewood and the City f North St. P Y Y P aul, Minnesota. Both municipalities: The phrase "both municipalities" shall mean t both the City of Maplewood and the City of North St. Paul, Minnesota. Cross reference - -Rules of construction and definitions generally, 11-41 et s eq Sec. 29 -178. Respective res onsibilities to maintain cer- a_in streets. The following streets shall be maintained as follows: R.adatz Street from Ariel to McKnight, Ariel Street from 11th Street to County Road "C," Halloway from McKni ht Street to North Sixth Street and Ste g Street, _ e Street from Ripley to Halloway shall be maintained b the City of Ma lewood. McKnight Street from Radatz to Blackfoot Street, and Blackfoot Street from McKnight to Chippewa, shall be maintained b the City of North St. Paul. (Ord. No. 149 § 2, 5 -3 -62) Y Sec. 29 -179. Newly constructed borderline streets; intent to equalize maintenance responsibilities. Any borderline streets or portions thereof which are newly con- . structed, shall be constructed by the city from which the request for construction emanates. This provisio q is intended to mean that, if, because of a development in one or the other of the two (2) munici- palities to which this article pertains, it becomes necessary o con- struct a portion of a borderline stree that portion of the borderline street shall be constructed and maintained by the municip in which the development requesting p y P q g the said construction is taking place; provided, however, that at the request of either municipality, subject to review p Y� this matter shall be sub � e and reconsideration so that the portions of borderline streets required to be maintained b the respective municipalities shall be k Y . P kept fairly equal in number of total lineal feet maintained by each. (Ord. No. 149, § 3,5-3-62) 1797 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Parking Restriction: Ide Street DATE:. April 7, 1983 A letter fom several property owners on Ide Street north of Frost Avenue requests reconsideration of the Council action to restrict parking. Staff w i l l attempt to notify all the affected owners of the meeting. mb Cl ad slone ouse n c. Custom Catering Anywhere 1375 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 April 1, 1983 Mr. Ken Haider, City Engineer City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Mr. Haider: Consultants Available by Appointment Donna Senty funk 770.1777 As property owners on Ide Street north of Frost Avenue we are writing to protest the Council's action regarding "no parking" on the east side of Ide Street between the hours of 6 P.M. and 6 A.M. seven days a week. If customers of Gladstone were causing problems for a particular property owner, why wasn't Gladstone House informed of this in order to take care of the problem. It seems most unfair to finalize this action, even to the point of installing signs and prohibiting parking without notif`ving us of any problem. We are sending this correspondence to your attention as per your suggestion by phone and will depend on your office to channel our protest in the right direction. Zhank you, your attention to this letter is appreciated. Very truly yours , rCC�2 Do Funk 770-1777 lWY F3onn e Kline 770 7.m Klima 770-- 272 DSF: kmw cc: Mr . Furry Evans, City Manager Mr. Ken Collins , Chief of Police RECHVED APR 4x983 BITY Ur wirrit�aGOD J OFFICE