Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1980 04-17 City Council Packet
. ry �. , r. 9 ... : * r. .. . ..,..1 .. . .., 11 :.(. 11 r, ,.... `,. ..1�. :%. t_< ,. i' te r,: .. .l ..,: , '�.:. - , .. • r '.', r • '' ;. I � ", .. 11 - -- , � , * -. �.,,...: ..: .. � �, �_, -�,��,,�`- , , ... �,t:; I I . s. �, , � . , . " , I , ., I . I -, ......i ... .:. .. ..,. r ,, ... .'.... ,.' :. r % : ,. ... .: ,: i'. ... 1 � . '' , � I , � , � I . , � � ��, : :,: i : � : .'' � , . , . J � :. .. 1 . : ..:, 1. ... .. .: ..' - " , . -, : ': � . � � � , � : I , ::. t .' t .�,,�, I I � : , , . , � I- ;� � ,� - ., ••.1 .. , r. . - � � . � I , • . 1 I :, ,, 1:� � �' I " . . . , � , I �! , - - I � � ��, , ,�� " I �� I I I � � . , )' - ,. , � , 4 .. r r ...: .. .. .. .: ::. . . .: . �� ' . , r :. . I � � - I " �..._.... :,,. .. :, . , ,; I I � 11 �� R R E T TI . I . I . . . . I � . I I . I 11 � . I I . I ; I . I � . : : I I I . : .V 15 I T ES A ON I I 1, ,;i '. I I ,� � %:� *. .1. ,. . - . . 11 I q I �': I I . I � ", ,� . . . 1 ' ' . I.., % I I I I I . 1. � . I ., 11 . . I I 1 � I I ". I : � O � � � � . , . .1, �:. �� , : � . I . . .. I I � I . . I I I'� . I 11, , . I , �. 11 I'� I . � � 1. 1, .1 P N ._ - I , '' ''. . :. .� ...,. � �. i . 1. � 1; . � I.i. . I I � I �� 1. I .. " I I. I..- f . .. ��.. �1.1 1. � I , ._ . .:, f ::. , { J : ., . I . I I I . I ". .. .. - I I 11 .1 � .., I—: , " C ] N QUSN . I ... .1 - I.. . 1. I I I �, :11 - ,: I. , , �; . y �� *, - :. 11 '.., .. I I . . -. 111.1 ; r . .. I . � I., :; I ..'' .. I � . �. .� - 1., ,: 1980 - Di Shad Tree Pro ram . � I � I - - I.. �. I I I - I „ •. .. ., ' ' - �� . � 4 .�:Vt�,,'� � '. . . I ,.,,�,;;: " , ,,,,,, "'P., -, I I . , I . .. I _ � . . ''. 1: �, � .' I I ":1 ..., . - ,.. ..: .. '., \ I ,. 1� I - I I - . I I :. .11�,'.�:, 2 Dra i na e 2450 Neml: .:,:.111 �� - . ��, . . ''. : '. I , 11 - , g tz I . I I ''I I I I . . ; . . , , i � I .. I 1, � , I . � I I 1. I - zl 7`, I , 11. • . 1. "I I . , . I . 3. Ma 1e Green Final Plat - - I I � . I 1. I— I-. � I I "I 1. �.. 1: I. �:Ip I . p . I . I : . I I � I I I., , 11 - 1. '11-1 !__ .. . .,. , � . I I � , , . . - , .. '� ... I � LL I , • 4.:� Sr eci al Exce t� on : 1997. why to Bear Barnhi l l r � . p p __ r. i . . • . I I : d, I . 5. Paramed o B� 1 1. Appl � c a ion for Ca l at o n r � . L . I , � .. . , ", : . .,. .. . . _ . _ . . Na Par c1 n En 1 i sh Street Frost AVenue to Soo L� ne Rai l road Tracks r . g g . . . . i, . . .. . . . -1. , • .. ��, 'r 7. U� viers License Renewal s . "'r , , ' I L . � __. %'. r K . �� . _ :_ IT9 :PRESENT ,. , .. , : . �� I : .1 . , : � . r I . � L , 3e . r 1 4. ..: � . _� _ , Ir j /T�� .V _ f 7 0 . . t , �r ... �} � . I ,. - - ', .. .. . . . r .,'. . . ✓ • - .. r' .'' ' j :: . 10. (L)• ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS L � . 9 . L L . . . . I . . . 9 9 9 1 � � . . r L r r r . I r I . 1 9 . . r . 9 � - . I I I . r . . . . . ( � � . . . . A DJQtJRNMENT r 1 9 9.1 . I . . L :., . �.. .:. _. _.. .._.. , . . .., _ - . . � �14_ . L .1 V iS... . . Mir•- i::..:... -..' -' .. .'... ..'. - .. ^......+ w._w+n•i...r.....�..�..n...... r. rww r _r_w.....w•..r.nwr..�..r_+... �... —. — __ .rru w......... ._+- �ry.^..rfww- ....:.rr._ - -__ .r.+e. .r-- _......w. r.....v_.,..rw...w - • CITY OF MAPLEWOOD A C G 0 U N T S P A Y A E ...•wa..+..w+n+r._..n.wnwr... DATE 04-17- PAGE i 0 U N T C L A I M A N T _ . O S E 00 M I N N STATE T S S U y _ . b __... _ ._... . _ M._._0E P 0 S I T S - D P�U T Y w REGIST 04160 7 � 00 MINN STATE TREASSURER DNR LICENSE FEES PAY ABLE 0041 L • . A.' A: 1v..r+ wvMVRMm•:v.n ..+..._. mow. _ -� • - - •. _ __ .� ..� _ .r ___ ._....._...3 9 819 E 5 M INN � STATE T � F A S S U R E � �_ TEEN SKI CLUB � P 0 '' D S1 TS DE PUTY REGI T� __. 004163 2 0 5s 0 0 COMMERCIAL TR A D I NG I MPTS SUPPLIES, PROGRAM G ii' ., ., 01 _......__ _._._. _ -.... -ASSN _ _ ._.___ ..__ -.... LAND OF LAKES � RE :T ..« .w....._ . . _ . S_G - - - - SUS �I�� �'I0� 5�+ M E M C E 0 1.SN • I - 1 . 004165 �� _...__. -. ..- ._.�_�.- _.... 120 00 -:._ - -- _. �... - -. _ _- - _. _ _ MN REG �- PARKS ASSO�G EES, SERVICE _. C 542 $ i Mi NN STATE T A _ rcE SSU�ER ADULT VOLLEYBALL DEPOSI CEPUTY REGIST. �F 1-c-A . _ t 8�;� ^� 004168 28 . * u 2 _ MN STATE TREA SURER -FICA �A Ca A* PAYABLE A D� t�ivT?1 UT'.Z0 8 F��A 3 ;3 0 , MUN ICI-PALS TREASURER TRACE + TRAINING 004110 x+.00 UNI�� _��ITY OF NINN.:SOTA OTHER CONS r �` � c Rt., GTr ON C0.T i4 z3I5'_:.DN:ERIA._... ^_..___ ....._m..__. DISEASED TREES _ . . F'E0 1NGGME - 0 04172 50 03 79 MINK 'COMM OF RL - _ VFQ..NU_,lE_- MINN INCOME TAOX PAYABLE L._ 04173 61* 48 IG44A RETIREMENT CORP EFERPE. D COMP PAYA3i 0 l'C O 5 E /, .......K -A W A_G.. 00417 81 300450 CITY + GTY GREGIT UNION C ECIT UNIO 0 U 4176 45.13 A F SG M E L O � A L i Z) 5 6 ..� ...._....__.._ _....,. -.,. . UNION OUP SAYA?. . _ AND-FAIR VHA�,,._ FEES PAS' OL4177 285 s 7b AFSGME LOCAL 2725 UNI D UES PAYABi =C A N.D. - F A..`. S H A R ILE aF E S PAY 004178 50 HN. DNEFI T A;S SOG N - ;FDA INSA�'A3. 4 - �a 041 _.. .....:. T - V N UE __.._._._ _. H N N N G O M �' ►� P A A 30 ' { 1 1 (7 4 . 95 * 20 MI NN S ;ATE TREAl"33URER 0EPOS][TS-0-E-OUTY REGISTO 0 15 jo C0 '"' Ai E 0 Ta 1 N S SE MI NA R T R A V r-L T R A 'N 1 iN G 0 MINK -- AT-E 'T-k -E AS �� 'S U ER ..- _-- ' ___..._- t C, D P 6 5: T Q. T Y OF-MAPLEWOOD 487*50 A G C 0 U N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 04-17-80 'PAGE 2 CHECK* A M -0 -U N T G A I M A N T P U R P 0 S E 004180 248,.50 UNITEO WAY-ST PAUL AREA UNITED FUND i EO PAYAeLE " 004. 004181 1 ,797. 45 MINN STATE TREASSURER DEPOSIT DEPUTY REGIS'T o 041 AFSCME LOCAL 2725 UNION DUES µ PAYABLE 11 * 00 004183 8*49 JUDY CHLEBECK SUPPLIES, OFF.'t'C,.-. ANO-POSTAGE 0-34184 « 76,*00 OAVID GERVAIS .4 SALARIES WAGES9 TEM 004185 11897,955 MINN �� t STATE S TREASSURER DEPOSITS- DEPUTY RE GI S T 0 -0-41 5 - I 01 015 MN MUTUAL LIFE I NS -I.. CO 00 39462*57 MN MUTUAL LIFE-INS CO C 0 N T R 1 -3 U T 1 0 - N" " S R A — N - 0 A/R - IN'15, CONTINUANCE A N .0 - H E A P AYWIL AND -LIEF INS LEO P.AYABL' AND-DENTAL INS PAYAB ANO-CONTRIBUT- ONSt IN 004188 . 95 * 20 MI NN S ;ATE TREAl"33URER 0EPOS][TS-0-E-OUTY REGISTO 0 15 jo C0 '"' Ai E 0 Ta 1 N S SE MI NA R T R A V r-L T R A 'N 1 iN G 0 MINK -- AT-E 'T-k -E AS �� 'S U ER ..- _-- ' ___..._- t C, D P 6 5: T Gir. 19 1 487*50 MINN S TREASSURER Otl"POSITS-CEPUTY RE GI S T 004192 499*50 MI NN STATE, EASSU TRt ER D E P 0 S -T-CEF-UTY Sl REG'ST. 004. ... A S REP �1.0 X PP N t 0, y . T OF FAPLEw00D A C C O U N T S P A Y A 3 L E DATE 04- 17-80 PAGE 3 H;EOK 4 A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E 005289 78 $ 55 ACE HAPC DW ARSE SUPPLIESt PROGRAM AND—MAZNTENANCE MATERIA1. _ 005290 - - 99015 ADVANCE STAMP CORP SUPPLIES, PROGRAM _ 005291 24o 8i ADVANCE . SNORING CO RENTAL, EOUIPMEyT Ov5292 70, 33442 AMERICAN NATI�C AL SANK 90N0S PAYABL AND —BOND INTEREST AND CHAR 00529 83.22 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK OTHER CHARGES 5 -2.9 4 � _�.� ��� A N E R I G A N N A T I G N A L BANK OTHER CHARGES 005295 48.00 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC SU3SC�'IPT10NS +MEMBERSHIP 005 296 64 * 63 ARTS TOWING REP MAI N'T o , VEHICLES 00 297 8*40 TO VOTING MACHINE SUPPLIES, OFFID£ 005298 14.50 3 DALTON BOOKSE.:.LER 300KS PERIOOIGALS 005299 .217650 JAMES GAHT FEES, SERVICE _ TTT IO HTG I PECT�tS 5 3.0 4 2 2 �. 6 8 _ A� r F U S _ S1 S, �' _ H L..�.__.._._ 005:301 235.77 BO OF WATER COMM UTILITIES .005302 40 *30 BILL BOWER FORD SUPPLIES, VEHICLE 0 � 5 � � 3 .... 2 -�_ �. 2_�__�_._w..__C.E.�� T � � _.�.�;;��_� � . .._...._nvw_�...__,�__.____�_. _..._ __.._... ______.. _ -.. -.. F �_;� _ � _ — E � � I �' -� _...�._w....__. _._._w__._. ANO— SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT. . FILM PROCESSING 0 0.3.0.4 61 s 5 L U — 0 N' 5.T: , A' , ,__.. _..._...T .K_. _ _ .�... -._..� _.._ .. _ _ �_ _ R�.. M AI N'.� EI E _ AN0O5UPPLI 3 ENiC#�E 0�530� �+9*68 CbNT.I`N�NT��. SAF��Y � UIP Q UNIFOP,MS + >LnTHi�d O G 530 6 64 82 DOPY E.OUI PME UT INC SU:PPLI ES, OFFICE 005307 9037 CROSSROADS FORC SUPPLIES,FHI.GLE : "` T Y OF MAPLE WOOD .A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E DA TE 04 17 — .8.0 PAGE 4 CH - EC K ....__.___�A M 0 , U N T _ __. C L A I M A N T: w _ P U R P 0 S E 005308 FAT GALE' FEES SERUIC PLBG 9 SEWER INSPECTIONS 0053.09 10,262 *00 DELAHUNT VOTO CO FEES, SERVICE G 7 .29 ,aOG .� RE -PAIR , _._ _._._.. _.__.____._. �_.... OIAMCNO RADIATOR __ANNUAL _ ,AUDIT ..._._.�. - -- - REP a + MAINS' * , V H I CLES _ 0053 �45�00 DICTAPHONE CORD CEP ��A -• INT ECRU ME T.P N f G05312 52.50 DISPATCH PIONEE PRE PUBLISHING AN D —OTHErK CONSTPUCTiON � 00 31? 5 i 4 - L1 NDA DIXON COPE AVE CONNECTION ZSU.PPLI E3 R0GRAM 5314 12.0 DUrvi00f INSITU' S ES, OFFICE 005315 10 *75 BARRY EVANS T�CA'�EL + TRAINING 005310 FABRA GRA:PFICS SUPPLI PROGRAM S U p p �. I � S � _.... � .� � j V ...^,......v. _...._. AND -T ,A VET. + TRAINING _ AND—SONG INTER AND ES °OTHER CHAr�:G CO5319 104,00 FLEXI:ALE PIPE- TOOL CO SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT LA 0 05 32I 6.79 GAGERS ARTS - CsUFTS SUPPLIES L , .. 0 GRA M S 005322 217.64 CAME TIME INC SIGNS + SIGNALS 0 5 �3 2 3 9 .. E `i t NU CO S'ALL T{�O.S AN:D— NA I NTE NANO MATERIA= ,. G N U I N E. PARTS S L j . �- S j _ i ..-_ _ M E _.._._ .__ AND — SUPPLIES, VEHICLE 0 0-5 3 �_5'______"_' ------- 7 84. c m A I NTEN AN+l AT IALS yj � TY OF VA P LEMOOD A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 04 °17 -80 .P 5 CHECK* A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S 0 0 5 3 2 E_ �'. �. r:. _. G L A�O S T O N E ...__L U M 2 E R MAR S_ ..._ _._ _. MAINT ENANCE . MATERIAL -- 005327 91.06 GOODYEAR SERVICE STORE SUPPLIES, VE HICLE t 0053 0 6 , 645 i 91 L AW ENFORC NT EQUIP C0 A �' ND -PAP + MA-NT VFHI _ 00538 306.20 GROSS INDUSTRIAL FEES SERVICE AND - UNI_ FOIF MS 'CLOTHING 005342 54� 00 LUGE:R. MERCANTILE CO, CARPET CLEANING 005329 16000 GRUBEPS HARDWARE HANK MA NTF.NANCE MATERIALS 00 53.44 297,. Oil - 1 0 , LV .i N ..__ J , ,._..G U . _ N D.A ._._..:M A I N T E N A N C E �� M A T E R I a L S - 005331 94i72 HA GLASS REP �- MAINT * , VEHICLES 005332 43.44 HAWK PAINT + JANITOR CO. SUPPLIES, JANITORIAL o 0 5 3 3 3 _.._..._._._.._.3 5 i 0 0 H 0N E Y'W EI.. L I N C ,,.._........_...._.._... �......_.__.. �. w....._.._.... _.__...._.,._._...._...._...... R E T* M + � ? A I ;'� T i1 , B L C G + V i�+ 005334 1 IN@ SCHOOL DIST 622 FEES, SERVICE •' GYMNASIUM DENTAL 005 X35 100.00 IN'TL GONF OF El,-DG OFFICI SU3SCRIPTI ONS+ME:M ERSHI - 0 0� 336 1 95 KNN E. °AI°� MFG CO SUPPLZ E ~ 5, cfl 005337 15310 72 KNOX LUM9.8m CC IPANY MAINTENANCE MATEFIALS 00,338 117 6 4 LABOR RELA�T10NS ASSO.0 FEES, CtONSULT,iNG � '5339 °3 5 _ Cfl i. NO, FA I NT T 0053 0 6 , 645 i 91 L AW ENFORC NT EQUIP C0 E QUIPM E NT OTHER 005341 46*66 LEES AUTO SUPPLY SMALL TOOLS AND - SUPPLIES, VENiCLE 005342 54� 00 LUGE:R. MERCANTILE CO, MATNTcNANCE MATERIALS 005343 1406 JOHN MACD- ONA�.0 _...u_.._..._ _� �'P� � �_ .._: T���.�yI�1 . G__ 00 53.44 297,. Oil MACQU,E N E+QUI PMEN T INC SUPPLIES, E0UI'PMEN 0 05345 16 i 68 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY. SUPPLIES, PROGRAM ,L ES Q ....__._ .. _.. r �a _._._.._......_..._.._.. SUPT - T" Y 1 1 •' r 1 f ."TY OF MAPLE HOOD - A C C O U N T .S - P A Y A B L E OATS 04-17.'80 PAGE b CHECK* A- M r r. U... N T C + L A I _M A N T P u -P O E AND SUPPLIES OFFIC? AND OTHIER CONSTRUCTION Ct CO PE AVE GLAD. SEWER 53� 4.2530 4CHUTCNISON NOROUIST S.ERVI WEDES PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS 00 2, 2 2 4 0 E INSPECT i METRO I S� ON S ER V ICE, FEES SEF cV If.'O* E ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS 005350 3, 110 * M IDWEST WIRE + STEEL PRO MAINTEN MATERIALS 005351- _--- -g0 ,.68 ___ MIOWAY T�AGTOR EQUIP C - VOID ---- SUPPLItsp . _ AND - SUPPLIES, �cOIUA. SENT _ _... ,._ u.-.._........_.._._...... 005352 r.. r.... rrr_..- n..... r.._.._. _.a._w�..___...w.....+_1_...r.r 15.0 00 -...-...._..__..._...... m ._.a+..._...- _.- _..v- .e...__... r.__rv.... _._..�.- ....r._..._ ...._ A.. r.___......._ _r.__..._....__..._..._...r_ M NN CITE' MG ASSN ...... _.. _...._�...._._..._. _. .__ SU85CRIx�TIO��S�MEM3Ei�SHIP 005353 - ---�$ 0 . 44 ._�....._. MI NNESOTA _ BE AR - LNG SUPPLIES, E O U i P M E N T_�._ � ►535 4 3 M 8PSI NQT 5475 SUPPLIES , EQUIPMENT AND— SUPPLIES, OFFIC _._.__ -. A SUP . I . E S ._.. I_ .._. PROG j ANU— FQUIPMEN T , OTHER E. � t �S R V .l j WASTEWATER OPER . CERT f 00535 35000 NN REG + PARKS ASSOC PUBLISHING 3J 57 � AC- E � UIPMEN ,CO EQUIPMtNT, OTH 0 5 �.. _.� _ ..,.._......,^...... ,.._.,._....W- r.....r_..�,._.._ .._.._....._..,,_._ <_.�._. � G _ ....._,.._.._.._. _._....._ ..� .� _ ....... ........�._.. Y sup - �r 005359 :283.16 NORTH CENTKAI. CD NST MAI NTENANCE - MATEKA. LS E 0053 ?0 3 0510 71 CITY OF NORTH ST :PA UTILITIES i �'(� -:- fvrr y 005362 1,461* 03 NORTHERN STATES POW CO UTILITIES 005:353 780# 39 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO UTIL IT.IE 0 0.5 3 6 - 7 - - 7 ' - 3 0* 8 3 .._.,..._.....,.... __ �....-..:.., ..-... xwr. w..« v...,.«- w ....+,..._._.,. _-.........,.._. �.-__ .. _..,....._....d......,,,..... _._............__.._. d i __.. ...,__. ..- ....._. ....,,... ........,..... . ...:.n.,,.....,..... »... o .. w .... r. e -+.- ,.-_..-.--«.._... v -......_.,......................__........._....- .,.... > .............r«.. t r' 1 t f i. -IPY OF MAPLEWOOD A C C O U N T S P A Y A 8 L E GATE 04-17-8 PAGE 7 'I CHECK* A: M O U N T C L A I M A N T PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, � U P O SE x'05365 15 6694 NORT STATES _POWER CO UTILITIES RAVISEY -= COUNT' TR EASURER 005366 49561 *66 NORTHE�.N STATES F0WE CO UTILITIES 005367 930.55 N0RTRE S ATES PO R CO UTILITIES FEFSp SERVICE .11090 N OPlTHERN STATES POWER CO UTILITI 0 53E9 i, 034 72 N0: T HEW N STATES POWER CO UTILITIES X05370 409*51 NORTHWEST SELL TEL CO TELEPHON j 05371 1,117,54 NORTHWESTERN BE"LL TEL CO: TELEPHONE z, X 05 372 727.98 NOP,T i1 EST RN SELL TEL CO TELEPHONE c 53 NOR' HHEST RN SELL TEL � CO _...__TELEPHONE Ju53? 5000 LAVERN�E NUTESON TRAVEL � TRAINING 005375 1 OLSEN CHAIN CABLE LANG IMPROVEMENT 005376 , 3 3 a�� OL N Cl�TO,AP,O CONS G S ., 05377 70X90 OXYGEN SERVICE CEO ING SUPPLIES', EOUI.PMENT 00 104 a 13 PALEN R.EFRI GIERAT.I ON IN:C REP-* + MAi NT o , 3 GG +GROS . 05.379 PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, u u5 380 122 * 72 R L FOLK � COMPANY 30OKS # PERIODICAL 5381 19.97 RAVISEY -= COUNT' TR EASURER OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS GLADSTONE STORM SEWER 0 053 .. 6�d H,1L�LS RE D P TiNG S:P_PLIS,, 005383 112* 60 RUGGED RENTAL RUGS FEFSp SERVICE CARPET "CL AN I NNG 00 199 * 23 S + T OFFICE PRC DUCT S SUPP.LI FS, OFFIC G G 5 3 5_ - _ __ __._� -, I �...�..�� ,0.0 ... "_...�..:�. "J_..SC��S 4 5386 - 83x85 SEARS ROEBUCK + CO SUPPLILES .JANITORIAL 005387 2,176.49 J SHIELY GO. MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4 i OF M A P I E WOOD A C C O U N T S P A Y A 3 L E D 04-17 PAGE d Fi CHECK* A M 0 U N T� C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E 005389 279.70 CIT O F ST CAUL FEEa SE CRIME LAB 005390 800 #00 CITY CF ST :PAUL FEES, SERVICES FIRE RUN 005391 390 ,x50 ST PAUL k SU3UR'BAN , BU S G. _ FEES. SERVIC _ COOL KIDS CAPER 0 05392 19 * 9`U FUEL. - alb. 005393 157* 2.0 TABULATING SERV BUREAU FEES, SEP,VICE DATA PROCESSING .5 � + 5 2 TA G T S 'O ES INC _... sUPPLr -S� O F F IC E 135 395 39 0 0 TE XG AS CORD MA INTEANCE MATEFc IA.S 4 J05396 " 2 80 J THOMAS ATHLETIC CO SUPPLIES, PROGRAM 00'5397 S 9. 0 U H R TOLL C _ S# A.:;. �. _.. .' 005398 121s20 TU NQUIST PA R CO ANO SUPPLIES JAN ITORIAL ij'5399 16066 TWIN CITY COURIER PU BLIS H ING. 1305400 5 5 UNIF0gt4S UN' IM.ITE O UNIFORMS C OTHING J 5 T { ' Jy�� N ./y 7 '� i j)j 2 (^�'(� �7jj `l Y �/J A� N' T • \•A S N H . A f, U: Ea "" A _ �•.. � t � V 1 7 -L � ........_ .........._..._....,...._ «._.. .. aU 5402 124. 00 W L V SIGN SUPPLY E QUIFMENT, O T HER 005,0~ 19 E19o22 WA OQR PUMP E0UIPMENT REP. MAIN T *, UTILITY ;0 540 4 103�- _- __.._._.. WAN e t- S I PIOUSR IALUPPMAL' COL ANO _REP o + �- TAINT. , -GUIPt ANO- SUPPLI ES, EQUIPMENT G C5405 5 ft 769 2i WHE -ELER .UMBER 2fR IDGE MAINTENANCE � E�IALS AND MP�OVEMENT 005 } 41 1u WHITE BEAR OFFICE. SUPPLY SUPPLIES, OFFICE u :�5 0? 6* 35 III .KINS OO -GE. SUPPLIES, VEHICLE i 1 t� a i 1 dTY OF MAPLE WOOD A C G O U N T S P A Y A 3 L E DATE 04-17-130 PAGE 9 . CHECK* __.._._�.. A� M 0 U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E 00540 _.... _. 73.25 YOCUM OIL c0 INC _ .._..... _...._. ...__.... �Pa �- MA R I -- _ _._.._. NT. � UIPME��sT � C 005409 78.60 ZA SHOPPERS CITY SUPPLIES, �- ROGRAM AND — SUPPLIES . EOUI ME 005 410 475* 59 ZIEGLER I NAG SUPPLI V EHI CLE A N O — S U P P L I 5 ,9 E Q U Z ` P M E N T 005431 183,00 THOMAS 0 CROPSEY SALARIES + WAGES TEMPO � 85 * 2 5�_�� ;� �.. S_.AA � R I ..� S.._.�_._ WA ^ GE:S � 005413 :. 192.00 STEVEN DIEBEL SAL ARIES + WAGES TEMP* 005414 64, 00 LINDA R DOUGHTY SAL.ARiES ¢ WAGES TEMP* ' � 5 41 S A � ' ... - -_ �_ __..__ ___......_ LA E.w _ ...� _--. -- -.�.._ _. ___ -. _..._ _�.� _ _ __--_ . S A.AS - �. 14GS _ _ T p. ., 0 If' 541E 144+00 CANDY KING SALARiE� + _.. .... . .. _..___..._ _ WAGES TEMPO 5417 44.00 ANN KINNEY SALARIES WAGES, TEMP -- " •:; _ 4.T UE�;- AJ..A~ �...... ; _�._ � T _ � E S . X05419 �; 3.00 MARGAR MONET SALARIES + AAGES TEMP* 05 X20 �� 120.00 RODERTA OLS)ON SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 10 • 3� H ' AR PLA....�_A LAnI E -w 005422 1► .x JES RYDEN SALARIES WAGES9 TEMP. x;5423 « 8000 PAMELA SCHADT. SALARIES r$ AGES t TEMP. SL I E SH a ,15425 :; 54.000 JUL SULLIVAN �ALARTES � `SAGES, TEMP* 005426 136o 00 JOHN TELLIN S ALARIES + 4AGES -9 TEMPO I < pp yy� :QTY OF t'APLE A C C O U N T S PA Y D LE DAVE 04-17-80 PAGE 10 C HE C K ,A M G U N T C L A.1 M A N T P U R P 0 S: rE 4X 5.4 3_ ._�...__._,...�..� 481 ° 4 0 .. JACO D J .�.. ���....._ .�_..�....._�.. _...._.,_._.......��__.._ COURT JUDGEMENT 005431 15.00 JAMES LASHLY FEESt SERVICE GUEST SPEAKER 5 3 2 fl s D D 5 C N W h N.....8_ y ..� . __.__..__.._.. __....._ .._ . ;._ ..} _ .M A s. 1' . D G. 5 005433 5400 ,TAMES THELIN R .F F U N D DUP. KENNEL LICENSE 0 054.34 2T 15 TRADE TOOLS I NAG MAINTENANCE MA �'E.kIA�.S REGINA ..: WE 18- L � _..�. . _....., � _ .... D . _....�...... _ .__..._ .w_�._.�.�.... . 1 Q0 GALS GETAWAY 005436 .. 881.25 VALLEY TOURS FEES SERVICE GALS GETAWAY 147 167 1 216.94 CHECKS WRITTEN T � _.� �.�..- -� F -- -- 18 3� . �.�..E�..�_S _ �t� �' A � .__..w �...._...2 5 4 , 3 0 _..w.._�._ ._ _ ._..�._...._.�_..__�.__......�_ w__._.__. �ri._..._ �._..._.Y..r.�..__.._..,......_ .�.�.r..�. r.:�rw,� _...._...__._..�.._._...___.�_ . INDICATES ITEM PAID FOR BY RECREATION FEES 1 y F C OF MAPLEWOOD €� CHECK RE — PAYROLL CA TED 04 -1 I —80 DATE 04-1144080 ( 11 yl CHECK NC0 CLAI MANT GROSS NET 23933 BARRY R EVANS 1 883993 .23934 VIVIAN R LEWIS 625981 419*0.8 23 LAURIE L BERGS TCCT 496*15 333988 23936 ROGER P OELFIPCCO 128000 .119011 23937 DANIEL E FAUST 1222939 795952 Y 23938 ARLINE J HAGEN 751 *38 34647 r 23939 ALANA K MATHEYS 522.00 348905 .23940 ANNE V RICHARCS 72e5O 68*36 -:.. 23941 LUCILLE E AURELIUS 1p 142a00 635927 23942 PHYLLIS C GREEN 584931 393990 23943 BETTY 0 SELVCC 584* 31 384°2.0 2 LORRAINE S VIETOR 440 *31 281,063 23945 JEANNE L SCHACT 176 *96 143,*40 23546 ALFRED J PELCCUIN 601 *85 68 *92 _ 23947 JAM G KLEIN 153 *00 133 *14 23948 TERRANCE C RILEY 144 *50 134.82 <.� 230949 CAVID L ARNOLE 966046 314*'72 [) 23S5G JOHN H ATCHISCN 848 *31 497023 23951 ANTS- #CNY G CAHANE 969 *69 545 *69 f' 23952 CALL K CLAUSCN 848,31 51,996 23953 KENNETH V COLLINS 1 185,991 '. 23954 CENNIS J DELPdCNT 1,126.23 161,*lO 23955 RICHARC C CRECER 967 *85 552*8O 23956 RAYMC'NC E FERNCW 572,071 136 *72 vy 23957 NORMAN L GREEN 986o77 455.44 23958 THCMAS L HAGEN 1, 204,6 31 174.43 23959 K EVIN R HALWEG 848°33. 449954 23960 MICHAEL J HERBERT 934905 526 ®97 :. 23961 DO NALD V KORTLS 169 :123.23 23962 RICHARD J LANG 901 * 22 5 3591 5 23963 JOHN; J MC NULTY 986 ,*3i 548 *51 23964 JAMES E MEEHAN JR 807 *69 457 *45 ..� 23955 CAMEL 8 MET I- ER 807,s69 518.9 94 23966 RICHARD P MCESCHTER 9 558 *63 i 23967 RAYMCN0 J MCRELLI 8320 552 *73 23968 RCBERT 0 NELSC,N 1t 109,63. 715.x38 23969 �%ILLIAV E PELT IER 949,955 523.57 r " 23970 RICHIARD W SC F�LLER 1, 303.81 806 23971 CO NALD W SKAL M 4N 89. 801 430* I.5 23972 GRECCRY L STAFJ�E 856979 517°46 23973 VERN'N •T 5TI LL 807 e 69 468o89 23974 CARRELL T STCCKTCN 83 7999 536917 23975 TIMOTHY J TRUHLER 832 * 15 416,E 36 BRACE W WEBER 733 e 85 460,910 A ,39� 2 39 CU °� E J W I L L I A P S 880,a62 446.o65 23978 JCSEPH A ZAPPA 988* i5 640.*83 23979 CEOURAH A BASTYR 413908 255990 23980 JAYME L FLAUGFER 545.54 362965 23981 GEORGE W MULWEE 464977 295 *72 ,r... c 23982 KAREN.A NELSCN 464977 294 *97 23983 JO's E CMATH 4.50*00 3.1 La 96 23984 JOANNE M SVENCSEN 545954 362.65 .:F 23985 MICHELE A TUCHNER 464x77 267°24 23986 RONALD D BECKER 1$ 089 *78 338*43 - 23987 CENNIS S CUSICK 1, 126.23 723..92 23988 DAVIC M GRAS 887°54 409*82 23989 C YNTHIA J MCRGAN 413,908 269* 74 23990 ROGER W LEE 903969 568,58 23991 JCN A MELANiDER 895 940 4659 .h 2399 CAROL M AELSCN 931 *72 555.. *29 ,t^ <., 23993 DALE E R,AZSKAI_C'FF 887,54 133 ,o31 23994 MICHAEL P RYAN 871 374 *71 23595 ROBERT E VCRWERK 1r055.o02 235*78 239.96 JAMES G YCUNGREN 907m52 530,995 -: 23997 JAMES M EMBERTSON 729.75 483,* 86 'z 23498 ALFRED C SCHA C T 9 53 * 54 597 * 83 23599 CLIFFORD J MCTTAZ 64,661 58 *14 24000 PAR :ELLA M MCT TAZ 584 *31 393* 31 24COI WILL.IAr L BITTNER 1v 264 *23 79 20 ' 1 7 l 24002 JAMES G ELIAS 790,m62 62 44 0. 3 24003 LEOTA 0 OSWALI 556 *15 351 *79 r , 1 1� i 4 YI j F .I J REGI STER C I T Y O MAPLE flQD -.80 CHE PAYROLL GATED 04 DA 04 CHECK NC CLAIVA GROSS NET 24C+04 CENN1S L PECK 790062 452.38 24CC5 PAUL 8 WEBBER 826ei9 545.42 24006 JUDITH A 191.60 158.31 24CC7 IGGR V FEJOA 674.31 455.77 24CC8 ihALTE€2 P GEISSLER 790062 496056 24CC9 JANES 'T GESSEL 674.31 451x87 24010 KENNETH G H A IDER 958o62 166.4 24C1.1 ROBERT F WI LL I AMSON 617.54 407.17 c 24012 t%I LLIAP C CASS 978.46 503s43 24013 RONALD L FREEER�G 694400 444.84 24014 RONALD J HELEY 762.13 482,.91 24C15 24C16 RAYkCNO J KAECER 776.05 5 582083 P I CHAE L R KAN E 766.48 343.33 24C17 GERALD W VEYE 766.48 388o34 24018 ARNCLD H PFARR 703.76 . 460.8.9 F . a: 24C19 24020 JOSEPH 8 PRETTNER 920.00 .628.47 EDWARD A RE I - #BERT , 762.13 482 *91 �J 2 GECRGE J RICHARD 762a13 460.24 24022 #BARRY J TEVL.IN JR 770425 562.3,0 F; 24023 JEFFREY P GR I ENANN 88.55 88,o55 .24C24 G I LBERT C LARCCHE 504.92 339.93 24C25 N PAUL INE ADAlS 679.85 433.71 24C26 RUDCLPH ' R BARANKO 893.54 535097 24C27 ERIC J BLANK 377.89 .252.85 24C28 LOTS J BREN�NER 555.77 .195003 24C29 BARBARA A KRUNPEL 220.00 .126.53 24C30 ROY G WARC 277.65 217.23 24031 PYLES R BURKE 696.80 406.45 24032 CAVID A GE, RVAIN 696,w80 442.40 = 240 33 _L IN J GUS INCA 928.63 537$ I.4 24C34 RCLANO B HELEY 696.80 4 58.15 24C35 HENRY F KLAUSTNG 696.80 396076 � 24036 REE E SANTA 696.80 469.3.0 24037 JC`,�EP -# P PLANTE 36o8O 36o80 240.38 Pt`iML-I_A J HERCFF 40,00 40 ®0O ' 24039 BARPARA J BRUNELL 126. /4 105.3 24040 JANET V GREW 263.25 1S9® 51 24C41 JAVES R VCKEE 58.41 52049 24C42 CHRISTINE SCUTTER 597.008 396.58 24C43 24044 .JUDY N CHLEBECK THCPAS 556.15 254.26 F "f G EKS TRANC 660.34 423 *10 24045 RANOAL L L JGHN SCAN 636.46 410.63 24�,4b NANCY J M I SKEL L 191.60 144.86 24047 CECFFR.EY W CLSCN 1,133o69 628.94,,. w�- 24048 LEWIS G MILLER 919*85 591.60 24049 PAIIJCR IE t STREN 919.85 590.055 24C50 ROBERT J WEN GE R 696 0 CiL. 473.18 ,. 24051 24052 RICHARO J PARTI-OLOMEW - E 724x40 398.65 CAVIIC 8 C S 6 N 641.59 400.39 24053 EDWARD A NADEAU 143.70 .,04..25 24054 LAVERNE S NUTESON 1,023.50 40107' A. 24C55 GERALD C OWEN 7.10.40 472..33 24C56I #_i IAA S THCNE 796,.98 523.87 24057 JOHN E PACCUNALC 768.80 508000 24:58 CENNIS V MULVANEY 743.20 463097 CFECK NUPBER 23933THRU 24058 89 522021 49 540.030 PAS RCLL DATED 04- 11 -80 24059 ERIC J BLANK 9 6 TOTALS 99 55,938.60 - -, f; r, v MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Public Works. SUBJECT: Arbor Month Resolution DATE: April 17, 1980 In an effort to call attention to the trees in our communities and to set aside a special day to plant trees, Minnesota conunun* ties have traditionally declared the last Friday in April "Arbor Day". Since 1978, the State of Minnesota has also declared the. month . of May as "Arbor Month". We, therefore, recommend that the City Council pass the attached resolution. a ti RESOLUTION DESIGNATING ARBOR MONTH WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is proud of the beautiful shade trees which arch. over our homes and streets; and WHEREAS,. the City of Maplewood is well known for its woodlands ' .ghat provide a serene and healthful setting for our lives; and WHEREAS, shade tree diseases do threaten our trees with destruction; and WHEREAS, our beautiful wooded lands are rapidly becoming d of ores t ed ; and WHEREAS, citizens all around the State of Minnesota are uniting to celebrate trees and to plant new trees to make our neighborhoods as beautiful as the wilderness areas which surround them; and WHEREAS, this is a - commendable of f ort that the people of this City would do well to join; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAFLEWOOD that April 25 is hereby proclaimed as "Arbor Day" in the City of 11aplewood and the month of May is proclaimed "Arbor Month"; and BE IT F ;JRTHER RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood calls upon the pub -i.c spirited .and foresighted citizens of this community to plant trees NOW for our pleasure and that of f uture generations . MEMORANDUM TO: Cit Mana FROM: Assistant Cit En SUBJECT: -Petition for Public Improvement Riple Avenue DATE: April 10, 1980 Attached is a petition for watermain improvements on Riple Avenue from Ed Street to proposed Sunrise Court. The petition is in response to a Council condition placed on approval of the preliminar plat for the Clausen Addition. The petition is in order with more than �'5% of the affected fronta si the petition*. It is recommended that the Council order the I preparation of a feasibilit stud contin on the'pe.tition sponsor g uaranteein g the cost of the stud Approval of the attached resolution is recommended. On 1 2 D al}; �� �le , the enders i gned, do hereby peti ti on the Counci 1 of the Ci ty of MapI ewood to: A T Tz. and that the said improvement be undertaken by the Vill age Counci 1 in accordance with the provi si ons. of Minnesota Statutes. Chapter 429; and that the cost thereof be assessed against benef i tted property as provided by said ' Ch_ap r 429. OWNER STREET ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT. D. . nnr r. C C, F_ V f'✓A E.t% F- mac. ro_- t 6- t � 3Z.-? • I certify that I have witnessed the above signatures, and the proposed i provement:s were discussed with the signers. - DATE ) - PETITION SPOiISOR r"**\ .� . I 3 3 6. Gs I •, 600 if `A 'T,7 + AV 4F _.._..._.._. "rU to c 75# CL � _--- s 1 c � � v LjJ MCI -� -�-- -- IA { Z , 70f _ i'• • Z �) ✓ ! r7 f - 7 - T =' 1 1 b . OCR ,r. r,q L-, 4. .,0 3 3 �_ 3 i "_i C ��4:' ; i'? -:<'. 75 75' ?. G k�.5 1 i •S...i. ____ ._ 4i2►c 3 j �. p u c 1 JC' CD { O 1 . 4 , ru C ID t. ��rl �` ` 111 V �b J w+ ON C. Alt r . s 6 d� a �� `y e e • • f !fit 4 {14 n ►' �r P'i� rr, � j � .Cil� o•s eta -9 a a 3 ?.+ �. -4.740 t.. 4 . l S a.= �0 fu kptol _ � j .11 /l / 1 o I NI I _ ' ' / , i � • � +• to � r ' � - - - _.'-." r ` J - s II •. r)� �L7 S • 140 Vf7 r .. ' ITV ! l4♦ 4 PETITION INITIATED FEASIBILITY WHEREAS, a certain petition has been received by the City Council for the improvement of the following described . a.rea : Property fronting Ripley Avenue from Edgerton Street wrest to Bradley Street by construction of watermain improvements, and street reconstruction; an WHEREAS, the said petition has been declared to be signed by the required percentage of owners of property affected thereby; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD , MINNESOTA, that the petition as her einbefore de scrib ed is hereby referred to the City Engineer, and he is instructe to report to the .Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a . preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and should best be made a� proposed, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. M E M O R A N D U M TO City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Special Exception Renewal LOCATION: 1900 Sterling Street 014NER John Songas APPLICANT: Yoshi ko Caturi a PROJECT: Yoshi 's Men's and Women's Style Shop DATE: April 9 , ,1980 Request 1. Renewal of the home occupation permit. (See Appl i cant's letter dated 3-30-30). 2. Refer to Staff report dated .3 -16 -78 for additional information. Past Actions 4 -6 -78: Council approved the Applicant's hone occupation with the following con- ditions: 1. Other than the Applicant., there shall be no other employees permitted; 2. The hone occupation permit shall be issued for a one -year term. After one year staff shall inspect the barber shop acid determine whether all Council conditions have been met. If so, the hone occupation may continue; 3. The work area shall be inspected and approved by Public Safety before business begins; 4. The Applicant contact the immediate neighbors to advise them of the proposed home occupation; 5. One sign with applicant's first name is allowed; 6. Owner and Applicant agree to the above conditions in writing. 4 -5 -79: Council renewed the permit for one year. Analysis It has been Council's past policy. to renew home occupation permits for five years that have proven compatible with the neighborhood. r l Recommendation Renewal of the home occupation permit for five years, including all prev i ous con- d i ti ons . Approval is based on the findings that there have. been no complaints on the - business and it meets all the previous conditions.. Enclosed: 1. Applicant's letter dated 3/30/80 2. Staff Report dated 3/16/78 Action by Cozrnoily o C:.3 to 2 U Yoshi I's Men I & Women q s Style Show 19 Sterling No St au1 (Maplewood) IvIn. 55109 March 30.0 1980 kayor , City Council of Maple - rimod 1902 Last County Road B app- % Minn 5 D ear. Sirs: 'lease renew our special, exception per..tr 1�'or operatin �, hair st lira sh op g .Y p in the home (1900 Sterling) I have ope rated the shop au for two ears at this p y address, and as far as I know there have never been any neighborhood complaints. Is it possible to het a licanse or permit for more than one y ear at a time? Icy understan was that after the probationarj period last year that I was eligible for a 5 year license. Your a tt�nti on on this - ► atter will be greatly appreciated. Ve t you OSHI K0 U C ATU El A -.. r� MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Counci 1 FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: Proposed dome Occupation -- Barber Shop APPLICANT: 'Yoshi ko Caturi a LOCATION: 1900 Sterling Street DATE: March 16, 1978 Request The applicant cant requests approval of a special exception to operate a barber shop in her hoi . Proposal 1. The proposed hoi occupation is a one chair barber shop. The shop area is proposed to be a partitioned off portion of the garage. 2. The applicant has explained that all business would be by appointment. Consequently, there should never be any parking on the street. Pl an ni ng Cons i derati ons 1. The subject parcel is zoned R -2, Residence District (Double Dwelling) 2. Surrounding properties are zoned R -1 , Single Dwelling Residence to the south and F, Farm Residential to the east. 3. The land north of Holloway Avenue and west of Sterling Street is the City .of North St. Paul.. 4. The R -2 section of the Zoning Code permits any use which is specified in Section 904 (Single Dwelling Residential District) 5. Section 904.010 (4) permits offices of professional persons when located. in the dwelling of that professional person or persons, and when authorized by the lawful governing body. Surrounding Land Use i4ortherly: Holloway Avenue, Single family dwellings Southerly: Single family dwellings Easterly : Scattered single family dwellings Westerly Sterling Street, Si e family dwellings 1 - 0' o a <t " Am ' T�e- rop0s.ed barber shop /does not p'pear as ' i t wjll COnflict wi th the nei gh- borhood in any way. However, as with any hoi occupation, there is the potential forproblems to develop. For example, the. business 'COuld grow large enough to create. traffic and parkin problems. Because honxe occupations can outgrow their premises, Staff feels the, home Occupation permit Should be is.Sued for a one ' r period. Af ter one year the . barber shop can be inspected and its effect on the neighborhood can be Jetermfned. If there are no difficulties present the home occupation may continue, The working area for the proposed home occupation should be inspected by the Public Safet Department.before business be Re d ti � Approval based on the above analysis and subject to the following: l. Other than the applicant, there shall be no other eimplOyees permitted. 2 . The home occupation permit shall be issued for a One year term. After one year staff Shall inspect the barber shop and determine whether all Council co nditions have been met. If so, the home occupation may continue, 3. The work area shall be inspected and approved by Public Safety before business begins. 4. Owner and applicant agree t8 the above conditions in writing. ' ' *. / /~ Act, ()JJ b� _ P L 0- Ma � NORTH ST. PAUL 6@8 1. '� al -------------- N. 0 L. L 0 y cr : :.) r --- Ld z. C) C) 0 cc >- fi E Y AV - :� C.) 14� 30 L A R P E N'l E U R AVE. cf) jj �H 0 AV ui zi o ct < F ay V) Ql) M A RYLA KE R D. .. Ld 0 Troiler Court f 68 2102 (Private} AV F, E, NIARYLAND I - ST 6 L'caver MAGNOLIA AVE. v-f r ;Tjr L A- oke VY vi id I 1900 STERLING STREET [ 3 1G--78 - Sa T DATE 3 F 3 CA S L E P G ! �'' ♦� ++� •� � � '• r P.N. • �'an,c, ,:a c�� tj I' T-k if A B c g� E I E ll ki W I N I 7 F- tt cli i "N -'Y cc N4 tE- - 4, S J lrr.•s...rm _ tt ti CL C c Cc Yk 'r 'YA ca—r 1190 f I -4L &A soft 41 7 lo � f F V- r at 41 Xm 1c% 6-781 3-1 ' T D A T:E �` � 1 vosxt, 4 S A L E T; MEMORANDUM TO Cit Mana FROM. Finance Director .RE Easements for Project 75-6 (Howard-Laroenteur Storm Sewer) DATE April 7, 1930 The Cit Attorne has indicated that the ac of easements which cost An excess of $1,000 re specific Council approval, Therefore, the attached are bein forwarded to y ou for Council action. Action by C-0111-r-cil:l .0 4 LAIS, BANNIGAN CIRESI, P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 5TH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101 DONALD L. LAIS AREA CODE 612 JOHN F. BANNIGAN. JR. 224.3781 JEROME D. CIRESI PATRICK J KELLY March. .2 7,r 19 8 0 Cit of Maplewood 138,0 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Attention: Mr, Daniel Faust Finance Director Re: Maplewood Project 75-6 Howard St, Storm Sewer Parcel No. 6 (1745 N. Howard St,,) Our File No, 3483 B Dear Mr. Faust. This is to advise that the fee owners of Par 6, 1745 North Howard Street., have called to indicate that the will accept the Cit offer for a pe pondi easement. Please cause a Cit check in the amount of $1,900- to be prepared and pa to Lais, Banni (se Ciresi, P.A. Trust Account for disbursement, Your prompt attention to this re will be appreciated, sincerel I S B GA & IRES A o n F, Banni Jr. JFB/me LAIS, BANNIGAN -&. CIRESI, P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING .5TH AND. CEDAR SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA $5101 DONALD L. LAIS JOHN F. BANNIGAN. JR. JEROME D. CIRESI PATRICK J. KELLY March 27, 1980 AR EA CODE 612 . 224-3781 Cit of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Attention: Mr, Daniel Faust Finance Director Re:. Maplewood Project 75-6 Howard St. Storm Sewer Parcel No. 9 (1715 N. Howard St,) Our File No 3483 B Dear Mr, Faust: This is to ad that the fee owners of Par 9, 1715 North Howard. Street, have called to indicate that the will -accept the Cit offer for a permanent. pondin easement . Please cause a Cit check in the amount of $2,,300 to be prepared and . -pa y able to Lais, Hanni Ciresi, P.A, Trust Account for disbursement. Your prompt attention to this re be appreciated, Sincerel �, BA AM C. RESI P.7 .,--Jo n F. Hanni r. JFB/me MR LAIS, BANNIG & CIRES1. P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4►9 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 5TH AND CEDAR SAINT. PAUL. MINNESOTA 155101 DONALD L. LAIS AREA CODE 612 JOHN F. BANNIGAN, JR. 224.3781 J E ROME D. CIRESI PATRICK J. KELLY March 27, 1980 Cit of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnes.ota 55109 Attention: Mr. Daniel Faust Finance Director Re: Maplewood Project 75-6 Howard St. Storm Sewer Parcel No. 4 (1759 N. Howard St,) Our File No, 3483 Dear Mr, Faust: This is to advise that the independent fer.--1. appraiser praiser obtained b the Cit of Maplewoo'd, Mr. Winfield A. Mitchell, advises tha th(-.z.' dama for the takin of 6,956 s ft. of permane pondin easement are $1,050, B previous a and past polic those instances where owners g rant easements either without consideration or at nominal consideration, an subse enhancement will be e over all owners. In this instance, the owner, Mrs, Irma M. Cummin g ranted an easement to the Cit for consideration in the amount of $316.25. Therefore, we are re that a check issue from the Cit of Maplewood in the amount of $733.75., bein the difference between the dama appraised of $1,050 and the amount previousl received of $316,25, Upon receipt in this office of said sum, we will make the proper disbursements and perfect the deeds'. Sincerel JFB/me April 11, 1980 STAFF REPORT To: City Manager Barry Evans From: Director of Public Safety Richard W. Schaller Subject: Sale of Used Police Cruiser -- Additicnal Gas Metering System Proposal It is proposed that . the City Council support the purchase of additional gasoline metering equipment for the Police Department and authorize the necessary budget transfer from revenue received from the sale of our used police cruiser into account number 121 -4640 to cover the expense of this purchase. Background: At the present time the Police Department has a fleet of vehicles using unleaded gasoline, and we are only allotted five metering stations at the new City garage facility, requiring several vehicles to be on the same meter. This prevents any accurate accounting of gasoline usage. The Finance Department has indicated that they will be able to provide computer analysis of vehicle operating expenses when all of our vehicles have individual gasoline metering systems. The Engineering Department has indicated that they will be able to purchase the necessary gasoline metering equipment .for us at an approximate cost of $ 700, including installation. On April 8, 1980 the Police Department sold a used police cruiser for a net revenue of $845 t- hrough public bidding. Recommendation I.t is recommended that the City Council support the purchase of additional gasoline metering equipment for the Police Department vehicles and authorize the necessary budget transfer from the revenue received from the sale of our used police cruiser in the amount of $845 into account number 121 - -4640 to cover the expense of this purchase. zze RWS :js iTt .r i t y S :.' t� e ,r vruwa� ++.w+nsrro�uaaa�e�e+raecaa MEMORANDUM TO Cit ma FROM: Assistant Cit En SUBJECT: Public Heari Hillw6od Drive and Dorland Road (Project 78-10). DATE: April 10, 1980 N This proposal woul provide streets and utilities for two developments in the area. In accordance with the Cit past practice, the develop Ex s would not be assessed for the improvements but rather pa their pro- portionate share of the cost under the terms of a Developer's A The attached Financin Summar shows the public costs . as well as the share for Castle Desi and Development, and Dawn Development, Inc. (1) Under the Cit current assessment polic the Cit share of the watermain cost is $9,810. (2) Under the Cit past polic of 0.045/ s ft, rate, the Cit share of the storm sewer cost is $84,600. To elitainate the Cit share throu full assessment, the rate would be 0.0825. If the Cit Council chooses to order the improvements, it is recommended that it be contin on the Developers pa their proportionate share of the improvements throu the terms of a Developer's Agreement. FINANCING SUMMARY Castle Dawn Total Desi Development Public Assessment Cost Share Share Cost Rate Street $593,600 $310,00 $ 88,1000 $195,600 $ 102,31 Sanitar Sewer 1449 750 62,000 162000 66,750 20-43 Services 26 8 51,000 13,850 571.28/ea. TATatermailn 144,750 76,000 21 475750 (1) 20.00 Services 22 95000 52000 8,210 616.95/ea. Storm Sewer 2.622, 100 54� 000 215000 1875100 (2) 0. 045/ s f TOTALS 11194 519 156,000 519,260 (1) Under the Cit current assessment polic the Cit share of the watermain cost is $9,810. (2) Under the Cit past polic of 0.045/ s ft, rate, the Cit share of the storm sewer cost is $84,600. To elitainate the Cit share throu full assessment, the rate would be 0.0825. If the Cit Council chooses to order the improvements, it is recommended that it be contin on the Developers pa their proportionate share of the improvements throu the terms of a Developer's Agreement. .� �' ,._� !. rQ MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Zoning Code Amendments: Accessory Building Setbacks DATE February 28, 1980 Re uest Staff i s requesting that the Zoning Code be amended. to provide for a uniform minimum setback for accessory buildings Staff also requests a Code Amendment to allow the expansion of non-conforming accessory buildings under specified circumstances. Summary of Existing C = . ode Sections 904.060 (Residential- Single Dwelling) and 905.060 (Residential- Double Dwelling) state that accessory buildings are subject to a five foot setback regU i cement for side and rear yards, except as follows: a. Rear Yard - "not less than four feet where alleys are plotted". b. Side Yard - "Where a garage is located in the rear of a lot, not less than twenty feet (20 ft.) behind the dwell i nq, such garage may be built so that no. portion tl ereof is less than one foot (1 ft.) from the side lot line". Reasons fo Chang 10 Boundary disputes are encouraged when garages Care allowed to be built within one foot of a lot line. Since the City does not require surveys for building permits, the Building Inspectors may not be able to visually determine if a structure is on the Applicant's lot. This is parti cul arl.y a problem with a one foot setback. Increasing the setback to five feet would reduce the chance of boundary disputes. 2. Friction between neighbors may develop, due to stormwater running off a garage roof onto adjacent property. Increasing the setback would help to minimize the potential for such disputes. 3. The Building Code requires a one -hour fire wall and no wall openings, when a structure is less than 3 feet from a property line or within 6 feet of another structure. Assuming that a 5 moot setback were to be adopted, the maximum allowable overhang could be accommodated and still provide a 3 foot separation between building and lot line, eliminating the need and added expense of a fire wall. 4.. There is no reason for allowing a garage to be built up t0 four feet closer to a lot line than another accessory building on the same lot. The converse would be more appropriate from . a public safety perspective. I 50 Public Works requests that driveways maintain a 5 foot setback to p rovi de an adequate turning radius onto the property and to provide adequate area.for snow storage. 60' A . survey of several other communities revealed the predominant setback for side and rear yards to be at least 5 feet for accessory buildings. (See enclosed survey.) 7. Sections 904.060 and 905.060 allow a garage to be built with a side yard setback of one -foot, provided the structure is to be located at least 20 feet behind a dwel 1 i ng. If at a later date however, the homeowner desires to expand the home or garage into the required 20 foot separation, a variance must be approved. Rather than approving each variance request of this type, as has been done in the past, Staff recommends that the 20 foot separation requirement be eliminated and replaced with reference to the provisions of the Building Code. The Code does not establish minimum allowable separation distances, Rather, it requires the incorporation of more restrictive construction standards when placing a structure closer than 3 feet from a lot line or within 6 feet of another structure on the same - lot. 8. Adoption of a uniform 5 foot setback amendment. would cause garages with less than a five foot setback to be considered as non-conforming. The Planning Commission has in the past voiced a concern that status as a non- conformina structure would create a problem for those persons wishing to enlarge garages which were legal and conforming p`)-i or to amendment of the ordinance, Staff has considered this concern and proposes that .Section 912.010 of City Code (Non - Conforming lases) be amended to provide fo expansion of non-conforming accessory structures under specified ci rcums tali ces (refer to pace 4) . Past Actions The Board of Adjustments and Appeals has, in the past, approved variances to the 20 foot separation provision of Sections 904.060 and 905.060. The most recent examples are : - October 13, 1977: Darlene Karow, 1896 Barclay Street - an addition to her home, reducing the requi, red 20 foot separation to 8 fee t. -July 23, 1977: 0«ry Bumbach, 2256 -Craig Place W- an addition to his home, reducing the required separation to 8 feet. On September 19, 1977 Staff recommended adoption of a uniform 5 foot setback and elimination of the 20 foot separation provision of Sections 904.060 and 905.060. The Planning Commission tabl, ed this request for further study, siting: (1) garages with a setback of less than 5 feet should not be considered as non - conforming for purposes of remodeling if built prior to ordinance amendment, (2) a survey of surrounding communities was desired, and (3) more justification needed , (See enclosed minutes), Recommendation I. Sections 904.050, 904.060 and 905,060 are proposed to be amended and Sections 904.100 and 905.060 to be added as follows (additions are underlined and del eti ons are lined out): 2 904.0500 SIDE YARD REQUIREMENTS. Each lot shall have two side yards, one on each side of the buildin For ever buildin erected or structurall altered, each side y ard shall have a width of not less than five feet (5 ft. LSide-�yardL' shall --fflean- the- d4s tanee-freffl- the- s 4de- let- 4 Re- t, e_wth�e nearest- ������� :. - -the -fete ern - - g 9 g requirement fer s aeas -- ..Pert4e19 8f-the hal --be subject to the fol- lowin modifications: 1. On a corner lot, the side y ard on the street side of such corner lot shall have a width of not less than thirt feet (30 ft.).6 2* A church, public, parochial-, or private school shall have a side yard of not less than fift feet (50 ft.) 0 on each side adjoinin other propert 3. When two or more adjoinin lots are used as a sin buildin site the side y ard requirements shall appl onl to the outside lot lines -. 904.060 and 905.060, REAR YARD REQUIREMENTS. l.. The. rear y ard for each lot shall have a depth e 1 to or greater than twent percent (20%) of .the depth of the lot. 2. The setback for dwellin accessor buildin shall be not less than five feet (5 ft.) from the rear lot line where- ige-al;eys-are-p4etted-and-Re-t-4 ess --3-. - Where-a-garage-4s-;eeated-41g-th e-rear-of-the-4et7-met-;ess-than-tweRt f eet . X28 -f s�de-4et-;4ne except that on a corner lot, a thirt foot (30 ft.) setback from the. street side shall be the minimum. 904.090. and 905.060, BUILDING SEPARATION REQUIREMENT, Separation between an accessor structure and a _p_ structure or another access structure shat be n con- formance with Buildin Code requirements. The proposed Amendments are based upon the followin findin 1 There is no purpose for establishin less restrictive s etback i rements for s K r .qaraces than otl'ier accessor y buildin 2. Boundar disputes are encoura when gara are allowed to be built within one .foot of propert lines. 3. Homeowners are unjustifiabl re to maintain a 20 foot separation between g ara g e and home when their g ara g e is less than 5 feet from a side lot line. 4. The Building Code allows an accessor buildin to be built as close as 6 feet from a principle structure on the same lot, without provision of frost footin or fire protects on, measures . 5. Elimination of the 20 foot separation provision will reduce -variance re 6. Amon adjoinin communities, the predominent side and rear y ard setback for accessor buildin is at least 5 feet. 3 VW II. Amend Section 912.010 by adding a SUbSeCt1On /8\ tO address expansion of non- conforming accessory buildings. The proposed addition is as follows: 912,010/8\ EXPANSION OF ACCESSORY BUILDINGS. An accessory building which is caused to be non-conforming, due to an amendment to the Zoning Code, may be expanded 1f the fUllmwing conditions-are met: a. The building is zoned properly b. The build1nq was a conforming Structure priOr to the effective date Of O rd /�m�ndment to XCceSS0ry Building Setback Requirements) C. All presently applicable Building Code requirements are met d. All portions Of said structure are on the Applicant's property e. Runoff from the overhang Of Said Structure is not adversely affecting an adjacent property f. Any proposed building addition shall be 0c away from side and rear lot lines , - ThiS proposal is based upon the following findings: l. Adoption of a uniform G foot setback would limit existing garages, closer than the required 5 feet . ,from expansion 2. Similar logic is presented in Section 912.100 of City Code. In essence, Section 912 states that if the City acts to acquire addftional right-of-way and sub- sequently reduces a previously legal and conforming property to a sub- standard Setback Or area, that use Shall continue as if the reductions had not occurred 3. The above criteria would allow expansion Of non-conforming. garages in a manner consistent with the proposed Setback requirements, thereby, minimizing potential public safety and planning concerns. ` C) o �o�l�le � D�� 4 �_���~ Survey — February 1980 ` ` ` ^ ACCESSORY BUILDIN SETBACKS ` ' The following qUGStiODS were asked of each City surveyed: Ile What is the required minimum rear Nard Setback for accessory buildings? 2. What is the required minimum side yard setback for accessory buildings? ` ' 3. What i3 the minimum separation reqUiremen the principal building anc| _ detached accessory buildings? ` The following numbered answers for each City correSpOnd to the above numbered qUestioD�3: Columbia Heinhts l. Rear yard setbacks: 2. Side yard setbacks: 3. Minimum separation: Coon Ra id l. Rear yard setback: 2. S-ide yard setback: 3. M'inimum separation: Little Canada 20 if door is facing alley, 3 if not 2/ 6' (frost footings and a fire wall required w1thin 6 feet). ' ` Rl (100' X 150' lots\ 50 ' R2 /8O X 135 lot\ 35" Rl-10 1 , interior lot, 20 corner lot; K2-5 interior lOt 20 corn.; lO/ ' ' lot l. Rear yard setbacks: 30' 2. Side yard Setbacks: lO 3. Minimum separation: None �_ '- "�� l. Rear yard setback: 5. 2. Side yard setback: 5' 3. Min separation: 6/ l. Rear yard setback: R1-40 R2 &.R3 - 30/ 2. Side yard setback: lO' 3. �fn1Num separation: None l. Rear yard setback: G/ 2. Side yard setback: 5/ 3. Min1nuJm Separation: None (firewall required within 6/\ ` White Bear Lake l. Rear yard Setback, 8/ 2 ~ Side yard Setback: 5/ 3. Minimum Separation: G/ - _ TIM �� Woodbury 1 . Rear yard setback: 20 Side yard setback: 3. Minimum separation: to be classified as requirements for an garage-35'. shed -10' 5' interior lot, 10' corner lot None (structure must be 6' or more from principle building' detached, if closer, the structure must meet bu i l d i na code attached structure) ATTACHMENT 8 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 1977 E AmendiTient -Z-oning.- Ordinance (904.060 (3) -and 905.060 (3) Secretar 01soii said staf is i- Is revision vrould re all nie--v�-17 to be'five fee from the side propert 1 in e g ara g es coiistructE,d Collmulssioner Fischer said there would be a with the existin g ara g es one foot from the propert line- that owii.ers wish to enlar The g ara g es would be considered nonconformin to the ne-W ordinances Secretar Olson said there would be the opportunit of g ranting a variance for the non- con f orm.ii.-I structures. -ett sald the Commission should further iivesti to see Commissioner Bar.1- -9- -ian would affect the i)on-conforming section of the Code. liow the proposed cl id lie thou the amendment was probabl in order -econim., ended the but it will re more discussion and con's idc---rat ion, r Commission table A Item 8 E ui Amendment" to determine what information the Coruiission will need to make a solid recommendation for an ordinance chan Co 0 Chairman Axdahl zisked how the Cit could re the size, hei and land covera of buildin in a proposal that would fall under the amendment, Secretar Olson said there could be criteria included 'which would de'fine the, type of units perm-itted in the district, Commissioner Prew said the definition, as it exists in the Comprehensive Plan, is definitel for construction of sin famil detached developments with an interspersin of duplexes in the .r-UL District. Rather than jeopardize the intent of the defLnition to accommodate several specific locations in the Cit he would su the possibilit of addin a new land use desi to the Comprehensive Plan (RL XX) to appl to these 'certain areas. He does not a with chan the definition to permit bi buildin in the RL area Commissioner Pellis-h said he concurs with Commiss loner Prew. He thou a- -new land use desi could be established which could be applied to the certain areas that are considered uni ti Secretar Olson said staff could- draft a new land use district if there.. is a concensus of the Commission it would be acceptable. Co Howard su staff check with other cities to see if the have used the proposed and how successful it was, Commissioner Barrett said the Commission had previousl prepared a document with land use cate and zonin cate a nd what uses would be permitted under each district, Secretar Olson said he would find the document and brin it back for Coutmission review. Commissioner Howard moved this item be tabled pendin additional 3-nf ormation from staff Conmiissioner Pellish seconded A all, E. Amendment to Zonin Ordinance (904.060 (3) and 905.060 (3) (Co-tinued-) Commissioner Sherburne asked if staff had reviewed the proposed Code change with the Fire Marshal, Secretar 0-1son said y es, lie found it 'acceptable. The five feet would g ive .a better fire protection, Coimiissioncr Barrett moved the Commission table this item for further stud as to how the proposed chan would relate to other existin ordinances and what other ordinances would have to be chan .Commissioner Sherburne seconded A all, 1.0 COIF MTSSION PRESENTATIONS, Commissioner Noward ,-:I Ice - of the action of the M-Ure-Bear-L C it y COUn. art, in the proposed- chem-tcal plant n..o.rtli of I. and ee,,ist: I i 6 1.'# s �A 1 N.OTI CE OF PUBLIC HEARING FO R AN MIEN DMENT TO THE ZONING CODE Notice is hereby given that the Maplewood Ci Council at their meeting of Thursday, April 17, 1980 at 7:45 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Maplewood Nluni ci pal, Building,. 1380 Frost Avenue, w i l l consider and receive all public remarks regarding an amendment to the Zoning Code to provide for a uniform minimum setback for accessory buildings and an amendment to allow the expansion of non-conforming accessory buildings under specified circumstances. Additional information on these proposed amendments are on file . i n the Office of Community Development, 1902 East County Road B. 770 -4550 ANY PERSONS. HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER ARE INVITED TO ATTEND AND BE HEARD March 28, 1.980 STAFF RE'PORJ. To* Cit Maaa Barr Evans Froill: Chief of 11olice R. W. Schaller Subject: Application for 3.2 On-Sale Beer License b Pizza Hut Restaurant in the Name, of William Charles Ferri. A cursor back check has been iTiade on the individual involved -in this application. Nothin was fouiid that would preclude his bein issued a 3.2 on-sale beer license, However, several other concerns do arise in this matter., 1. Man y oun g , people normall fre this t of *pizza oper Steps should be taken to ensure that the 3.2 been is served in an area reserved for people 19 y ears or older. 2. Onl emp-lo over 19 y ears should be allowed to serve 3.2 beer. 3. The appl'l- cant should take steps to ensure on-sale beer will not be removed from the premises This should i-tL.11clUcle si listin this prohibition and staff people assi to watchin to prevent this practice. 4. Linder no, Ci-.r-C UMStances should 3.2 been be sold as a carr item, For y our information. j s cc 80-003161 Cit Clerk A. I - c, MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Communi Development SUBJECT: Variance and Lot Division LOCATION:, 2130 Arcade S tree t APPLICANT/OWNER: Voya Pi 1 eti ch DATE: April ' 10,1980 t Reques t e from the -balance of the property A variance and lot di to divide h� s hoes Site Des cri �tion • 1. The applicant ovens the six lots shaded on the en closed "Existing Property Line Map (1980)". . e Count This is discussed 2 . Th These six arc. -ls were recorded in error by the y p . tt under the "past actions section of this report. further u p tai ns the a l i cane:' s house. The other lots are 3. The northeaster 1y lot con pp vacant. recently been sold by the applicant and have 4. Parcel 100- 35 and 050- 35 have y houses on thee. Proposal • nor parcel {parcel 080 -35} and . The applicant cant vroul d like ke to sell then _ -35 and • - parcels (parcels 060 -35, 070 --35, 120 35, 110 comb? ne the rema� n� ng pa c 090 -35 } into one parcel under his ownership. Surrounding Land Uses • narrow 1.92 acre parcel .1 Northerly: A single dwelling home on a 1 ong y Easterly: Keller Lake Westerly: Arcade Street • on a 1 can ,narrow 1.09 acre parcel Southerly: A single e dwe11 i ng home 9 1 ` Past Actions on the A li can t 's Si to 1. The original lo ts for 21 28 and 2130 Arcade are shown on the enclosed map titled "Existing Lots Prior to 1973". 2. 10- 18 -73: Council approved a lot division for a 75 by 200 foot lot at the northwest corner of the site, subject to the payment of a sewer connection charge (i f any) and the appl i cant agreei ng to thi s payment i n wri ti ng, pl us payment of 1 of di vi s i on fees . ( See encl osed map 1 abet ed "1973 Proposal } . Thi s division has not been recorded by the applicant. 3. August, 19.75: Applicant applied for a lot division which would have created a 100 by 140 foot lot at the northwest corner of the site . (See enclosed map labeled "1 975 Proposal"). 4.. September 18, 1975: Council tabled the request until staff could prepare an overall development plan for this area. 50 November 20, 1975: Council adopted the following policy for development west of Keller Lake, east of Arcade Street, north of Rosel awn Avenue, and south of Highway 36: Minor additional development will be permitted limited to using existing streets and requiring f u l l compliance with existing City Codes as to lot width, area, frontage on improved streets, and similar requirements. (See enclosed staff report of October 21, 1975) . Council then voted to deny the proposed lot division, due to the fact that the proposed lot was smaller than is predominant in the area. Council added that they would be. willing to consi der a lot division making that lot a some .what larger one. (See the enclosed minutes of the Council meeting), 6. 1976: The applicant submitted a plan for future development to the previous City Planner, Dc.b Reed, as shown on the enclosed map titled "Future Develop- ment Proposed by the Applicant (1976)". 7. April, 1976: Applicant requested approval of a lot division which would create a lot of approximately 30,000 square feet in the southeast corner of the property. Applicant also requested a variance for this lot from Section 1005.10 (5) which states that all lots shall abut on a dedicated public street (see enclosed map titled "1976 Request ") . This division corresponds to Lot 2 of the enclosed applicant's Future Plan (1976). 8. May 13, 1976: Council approved the variance and tabled action on the lot split to allow Staff time to investigate the sewer assessments 9.. May 20, 1976: The lot split was approved. Applicant has not filed a deed for this split. 10. October 10, 1978: Applicant submitted. another plan to Staff for the future development of his proprty. (See enclosed map labeled "Future Development proposed by the Applicant (1978)". 1 l . January 18, 1979: Counci-1 approved a lot di Vi si on for a 110 by 143 foot lot at the southwest corner of his property, corresponding to lot 3 on his 1978 future Development Proposal, 2 K: 1,20 Joly 27 1979: Staff approved a lot division correspondin g to lot 2 on the applicant's 1978 Future Development Proposal. Council had previously approved a variance and similar lot division on May 20, 1976. The applicant asked the City Attorney to draw up l egal s for each of the lots shown on the enclosed map titled "Exi s ti n:g F roperty Line Map (1980)". These legal s were not to be recorded, but were only to be used for future applications. The County mistakenly recorded six separate parcels. The applicant would like to have these lots recombined and a lot division /variance approved for the northeasterly parcel Past Actions on other Area Properties 1 . 1956: Registered Land Survey 103 (see enclosed map titled "Existing Property Line leap (1980)" was recorded creating four buildable lots ranging from 11,250 square feet to 38,370 square feet. Lots "D" and "F" do not have adequate frontage on a paved public street. A variance would, therefore, be req.ui red. A recent court ruling on a sewer easement through these properties found that lots "D" and "F" are legally buildable, since they were recorded prior. to incorporation of the City and adoption of ordinances. 2. 12- 21. -72: Council approved a lot division for Mr. Harmon at 21.38 Arcade, splitting a long narrow lot into two parcels. The easterly parcel does not front on a paved public street. 3. December 4, 1975: Council approved a lot division for 2140 Arcade, splitting a long narrow lot into two parcels. The easterly parcel does not front on a paved public street, but does have access to a 10 foot wide, paved driveway, Planning Considerations l Land Use Plan designation: Residential Low Density, not to exceed 14 people Per net acre. This neighborhood has s ubs to r: ti al ly less density than allowed, because of the long, narrow lots. 2. Zoning : R-1. Single Dwelling Residential. The minimum lot size in this zone is 10,000 square feet 30 Section 501.020 of the City Code states that: "No building permit will be issued for any construction wi thin . the Village unless the building site is located adjacent to an existing street which is dedicated and maintained a-s a Village street, or unless provision for street construction has been made in full compliance with this code and in no case until grading work as provided herein has been completed and certified to the clerk by the Village Engineer; except that in isolated instances the Council may enter an agreement with a property owner for special handling of an unusual situation which agreement shall be recorded so as to run with the land, affected." 4. The proposed lot with the applicant's house would not have access to a paved public street if this lot split is approved.. 3 'P ublic Wor Con siderations The house at 2130 Arcade Street is connected to water and sewer. 2. A .sewer runs north and south through the middle of the site (sewer 72 -13) . 30 The City Council has stipulated that all newly created lots east of Arcade Street are to be assessed $2,644.51 for this sanitary sewer at the time of filing a lot split. The newly created lot will be adjacent to sanitary sewer 72-13. Ci ti zen Comments 19 A letter from Gordon Grant, the adjacent property owner to the north, is enclosed. 2. Esther Rylander, the adjacent property owner to the south, made the following comments: "I feel this would establish a dangerous precedent and encourage other such req.Ies is , endangering the interests of other property owners in the neighborhood." 3. The owners of 2128 112 Arcade, relatives of the applicant, have no objections. This is the new house on Arcade Street. Analysi s The. Ci ty has found it difficult to establish a consistent policy for the development of the area east of Arcade Street and south of Highway 36. A policy was adopted on November 20, 1975 limiting future development to existing streets and requiring full compliance with City Codes for lot sizes and frontage on improved streets. Six months later, in May, 1976, Council approved a lot division and variance for the applicant, creating a lot without frontage on a paved public street. Pre%,jious to the 1975 policy, there were seven lots east of Arcade Street without direct street frontage. There are an additional four lots with less than the Code required 60 feet of frontage on a public street. It is apparent that this is an unusual area that has not been developed according to the City's traditional standards. The proposed split is similar to other lots in the area and is almost identical to the variance and split approved by the Council n 1976. The purpose of the split .is to allow the applicant to sell his home and retain the balance of the property for future development.. Staff cannot see a problem with this as long as an easement is granted over the undeveloped property restricting future development without Council approval. Staff would recommend that any future house in the rear of, the property have access to a paved public street. If Council is concerned with the size of future lots on this parcel, the City should create an "estate 'lot" zoning district for this area. Under the present R -1 zoning, the applicant can develop 10,000 square foot lots, if he can provide a public street. An "estate lot" zoning district should have a minimum lot area of. at least 20,000 square feet. 4 Lc:., Re nd8tfo ' ' Approval Of the variance and lot division, with the following conditions: `. l. Payment of required cash connection charges (parcel \ 2. ThG undevelOped lot� O8O-3�, O7O_3b, |�U-3b, U9O-�b, �M� �|O-�b Shall be -combined into one parcel 3. A reco deed Shall be filed 8gafnst'the undeveloped lotS that would quit claim the right to build without specific approval Of the City Council 4. An easement shall be provided from parcel 080-35 to Arcade Street. EnclUSUreS; l. Location Hap 2. Existing Property Line Map (1980) 3. Existing Lots prior to 1973 4, 1873 proposal 5. 1975 proposal 8. Development Plan Report (10-21-75) 7^ Council minutes (11-20- 8. Future Development Plan(]976) 9. 1976 Request lO. ' Future Development Plan /l978\ l. Letter from Gordon Grant 15-80\ 12. Applicant's Letter /3-29-8O\ 101 60 Gervols Loke A V E. KOHLMAN j t AVE. F: RO AD 91! T-Y D I /1/ 0 -AV E. 60 L-ce SIR Keller L V I VI -Lake CS R D.. L AURIE 'R A Y j vyNAnn Y �r �� SWIKONT LA. r5 Z A U 6 E.,-.. MT VERNON AVE ] AV. BURKE L44 0 N r 4 -7 SAILLMA KOW' OD LA. cr w 4 MT C-5 TRNO VE. Hi e 2C AVE. 50 0 LWOOD AVE. BELL � ��: � I 27 r -1 e*Aw rr. R tap Ij 0 LN I $T t4 AV E. 0 AV E. T. PAUL eti ch vo Pi I PET�T�o REQUEST Lot Spl it E 3 6 CO&47-. s -7-9 C'O 7 LARK,V 25 C OUNTY 6 [LELAND 25 3 : JUNCTION AVE. W RKE ELDRIDG tt n4$4 •.A la E L M 0 N IT VE . SKILLMAI V, (cc VE IR V " R. � •� cry EIS N�TON AV E. S U E R A FRISSIE AV rq I PLEY -P 30 PH IA AV E SOP ij A�� 7 PRI I- 62 LA PiT F1 F1 F1 I EAM Loca-ti-on Map C 2 f'� J t . • • 111,, y ` � • 1 1 A a ,�. O Fz f ^1 T -q.. . Y ° � 4.. rbrt.•+ti� ^" -. �. � :a� !r".7Y _ •, ..'� . •�.�. - i - - sy....� S!. 'vA5..1'• . .'7a`!.•• " ..,.« .. .......,,. ft. 'Ld ". .. " .. n ...h, .... '• a.w,..... -�.. _:: �- 4 "!•" ....s.- . ae:1:`i�'awe »«..- .i.:V"T•. t ' PROPOSED SPLIT LINES v c t ,x,<metFkY.e�++,.� �t�+ 3 �a SdSi'��`^ ' r a•.°+'at °T:SS'�'a" r` r • t y � t '. .f .S' �x A vg . K ✓. ... Y • V 1.' f� • . T' _ _._.._�... - ._...........�, _. �.�� } ..w P, y . ..i• `VR" .,.' .�3�.• «�,:+Je:..deL.� ��•,•4 - �.nr✓w— . r^- ...•..an. .►.ar .'rte,- a.. At...•. . _ •, � E' .' } ( ' . y .. _. mss• .i"�•g Z. C 9 •��� °1. ',!.•�J: c• 1 le ,..,sP .' :.'Y•'� v.9 .•,>' MA d [+ I .. Jrq h A V S \ C - 0 TY I r� .. s_-v . a t - .1�' knilr; d'+ y M1°,.�r5y..' <�1�° . kf;C.: , �� •..,v;...+•�. • r 'Tr :9 dC'' t ; ' j •,�, < 1 v. • .. -. j:,.. 1..�;.o .,. !L�e,�'i .fi.ttl. s 1 ` . 'w:s F' .7 'ku.s ,• '"':: " ?/. *e rJ..'�C"'`�'3' d si�i, ° .c s ,�v EJ •`',,�" ''e.' t• t � �r 6 �. x:= f � fT t - s"°•.:i y� X "�.' '., .•,. .1 -; �7 �► 4 ry? { 1 k :� t •� � � �.. s ��; t . : l.' 4�ti 'y"1 a �^+� - f. , ,a; V1 4 �, � e k � #- . • 4. mN•i T » f (, 0 i s' + ° ••'.�„ 4 { { :; ?4 `fit . V. ! } • . P q :tp.� Jt .���!? f • 4 k�jo`s .. '7j /1i� :� ,. • ''�1y.I fe f "" •t �w . M '•',. u •i�fiti"�w+1a� .Y2�' ' S'3t:���= �14uW6'� u "cYt.^1... _ , ��,1711P','•0.��� �'''� ".. n� II - �I Cc, '00 a IDO Q so ��o V s9 O w 37 14.1 -- _( -6l S. 3G) 0 a 6� go y �d a 0 Q G.. c� v 'L b O a At a CITY OF eT. PXU L COUNT%( Or Ft.kMSE`f • 36 EI - VOYA PILETICH fi r PETIT E' REQUEST On MUMMONM 4� i 1 .a " . ^'S'.:1.'_•`:r ,r t . • - �So s o � ° :. • � 1. � aJc. C v }� LA J do o • IDO Q so ��o V s9 O w 37 14.1 -- _( -6l S. 3G) 0 a 6� go y �d a 0 Q G.. c� v 'L b O a At a CITY OF eT. PXU L COUNT%( Or Ft.kMSE`f • 36 EI - VOYA PILETICH fi r PETIT E' REQUEST On MUMMONM 4� i 1 .a " . ^'S'.:1.'_•`:r ,r fJ 1 • 1 A • 1 wr, rn rn co 4 . .. ic s • �+ U \ La CL { � _" _., " , � -'..' .. � _ 1.x5 o n fR � � w �♦ $S p t0 4 " N '_ �' TEE { A . • � exrw4 Ch 3 • / 2t 7O 1 m t EE e'E T 98 �- s f - 0 -- _ _ f 0 - TY aD. - �• TEE - RLtD re ` • � N �fA E ' ?4 Sd � is yf CA �t" TEE a � f - N 1 � N rn 1 ' `t •y N �w STIJS OUT Of 19 .0L • t�rc�russ mot• i l� t t E I t i 4 .' {tA 1973 Proposal (approved,,.but not filed) ``yl • • �. • 4 TEE r 4 ~ + 'T E •. • • j ow Ok 0 CD .= �-�- '� N .••. 4" T E E 4 T E C -q i EXTRA p En P AO ��d TEE EE • a B r EL - s rx 40 low Aft 1 i � s ue.... -_, ..•.€ r - � •1. g '•. "'..- �. � 1 i . 6 � . t • _ ♦ o' e TEE - °�r \0 ,. �• • • too Line, Lli /00 100 too .- � _' � - tom . - ` ....., ..,-• --� ....• r•-- .. ---- -• =- ' r-• - - w TEE _ ►- -_ .___.. - r . Cr C640?0% tint �4-see 17 3 01 - . • _ _ 4J Q .7 .. off 0-+71 _ CT?":� ••.� -. Ol - a j5 TUM OUT -0f M -N. s 4, y :p f• p .J VOYA PILETICH PETITIONER LOT DIVISION REQUEST _M_EM0I=DU`M TO: Ma and Cit Council FROM: Michael hiller, Cit Mana SUBJECT: Development Plan East Side of Arcade Street DATE: October 21, 1975 Back On September 16, 1975 the Cit Council -revie a variance re for _1o' t width re at 2160 Arcade Street. As a part of this review, staf f was directed to prepare a stud on potential future development of I the area l g enerall y on the west side of Keller Lake between Arcade, Hi 36 and Roselawn. Area Characteristics The total area within the stud area is approximatel 50 acres. The t*e r -1- a kri is rollin with the rid and valle running , g enerall y north-south. The steepest g round is in the central portion with the g reate'st slopes (30-35%) adjacent - to the... .1a*ke-... Low and flat areas exis * t in the north adjacent to n the sewer lift statio and in the south around the Luebben Arboretum. T . he entire area is characteriz'ed b substantial mature tree g rowth, Ownership Pattern Presentl there ' are 31 separate parcels within the stud area and all but 12 of these have fronta on both Arcade and Keller Lake. Lot depths of the double fronta par-cels ran from 300. -350 feet at the extreme north and south ends to 800 feet at the center with the avera over 600 feet. Lot widths are narrow. The ran from a low of 67 feet (5 lots) to a hi of 237 feet with. the avera bein 100 to 125 feet. Sanitar sewer is in place in Arcade Street. Additionall a sewer line has been provided parallel to and approximatel 400 feet easterl of Arcade to service the central, internal portion of this area. At the time that the second sanitar sewer was installed the propert owners indicated their desire that the sewer serve onl the existin homes and that additional capacit be restricted. Therefore, if additional lots were to be developed an increased pumpin capacit would be needed for the existin lift station. A water . main is located in Arcade between County . Road B and Eldridge. CD Access Most of the homes in this area are located on the easterl sides of the lots ad l ake shore., and therefore g ain access b lon individual drivewa To provide access f or the complete area if such is developed into I conventional 10 to 15.,,000 s foot lots, -additional internal streets are necessary* It is possible to serve a portion of , the central section (approximately 600 feet in a north-south -dimension) b means of a looped street or two separate cul-de-sacs. Problems relative to installation of internal streets are terrain, poor soils, location of existing homes, tree g rowth and cost. It is doubtful that a road could be placed over t.he existing sanitar sewer line due to construction techni used in the ori installation of that faclilitye r . \11Z Future Development Alternatives There are three possibilities for futher use and development of this area `-'a p resumin that the Comprehensive Plan-'s recomm, endation f or Low Densit Residential is not amended. 10 Minor additional development would be permitted limited to using Q, existin streets and re full compliance with existin Cit Codes . as to lot width, area, .fronta on improved mproved streets and similar re - Considering the wa in which properties are �-.� �.. ip presentl developed and the existin ownersh pattern this alternative would mean a preser vation of the present condition. Perhaps an additional 6 homes could be developed under this approach. Terrain and ve would remain as is and additional utility improvements would be limi ted to the eventual provision of a water line in, Arcade. 2. Yloderate developme . nt usin existin streets and permittin waive to lot front re use of "fla lots and drivewa access easements. This would allow an additional 15 to 20 homes primaril throu allowing two homes for each double front-a lot. This approach would preserve . the major extent of the present character of tfi& -" lot .-.-.- _A water..- line would ,at some point, be re in Arcade Street. Dependin on buildin location and direction of draina 0 an increase in the sanitar sewer 'lift station pu mp capacit ma . approximately 6 additional be requir ed. The present pump will support residences. 3. Maximum development providin new internal streets - development in accordance with existin Code re This would provide for development of standard R-1 sin famil homes (minimum lot area 10,000 s feet) with loop or cul-de-sac streets providin access to the central portion of the area. This would mean g radin g A ites. and tree removal for improvement of roads and buildin s " the area is divided into a number of relativel small ownerships this use would probably develop a few lots at a time which would P resent problems for utilit it and street i mprovements. In addition to the Arcade Street water line, new street,14atle,r-`Iine_3, sanitary L sewer improvements and storm drains would be necessary. Y � • R Recommendation o si derin g the affect of developmc- nt on the nature and character of the area C n question, the previously expressed wishes to the property owners f or �. q � P retention of that chf.a.racter and the existing low density it is recomriend.ed ternati_ve �rl mini.rrium development using existing streets and with that a1 s om Hance with all development requirements be adopted as the preferred full c p method for direction. of future land use and development. c U� • K 40 • u U V J. %J Lt f t [ I - l l M ,. A. LA 1 i a. Director of Cotes ity� Development Reed presented L-he staff r b. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommend- ation: "Commissioner Prew moved, that the Commission advise the City Council they con cur with the recommendation as stated in the memorandum of the City manager dated October 21., 1975 regarding the development for the east side of Arcade Street. - Commissioner Waldron seconded. Ayes: Commissioners Flaugher,, Waldron, Kish.el, Axdahl, Prew; Nays: Commissioners Barrett and Fischer." c. Mayor Bruton asked if anyone from the area wished_ to address the Council. The following were heard Mr. Gordon Grant, 2234 Arcade Street; Mr. Dick Ties., 2138 Arcade Street. d. Councilman Anderson moved to a rove alternate No. 1 as recommended in the staff report for the development plan for t - i e area on the east side of Arcade Street, Seconded by Councilman Wi eger t. Ayes - all. 2. Lot Division - 2130 Arcade Street J a. Manager Miller st. :d the proposed lot division f. 2130 Arcade Street was tabled on Sept.ember 18th with the stipulation that it would be reviewe,3 when a development plan was presented for the east side of Arcade Street. Staff recommends denial of the lot division due to the fact the proposed lot is small- er than is predominate in the area, b. Mayor Bruton moved that the proposed lot division for 2130 Arcade Street be denied but that a letter be sent to the applicant defining the adopted L development plan and reflecting the Council's willingness to consider a lot division making that let a somewhat larger lot consistent with existing lot seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. MAP 8 f I i rn .i Cc w i 1 V• Cj Q .� 0 V. rn C3 1 tD j 1u 1 3 o♦to s VE pr f '1+ SS l O 1 t .4 ss 4• T![ E XT kA O . s f Y # 01 i s r to r�l �g .� �o ° ° � p♦ t t Sva2':y A Future Development proposed by applicant (1976.) i S lint l i Fr.2r �' r { Sva2':y A Future Development proposed by applicant (1976.) cn •-f�•y� w__� rM. Sorg teftt* 91 . e �_ • rn b�► • _a Let, ` r- by42 a FS ' ., • a T r E CD t � � ` c�..�. I,.,r �.,4• 17 b _.,., � .f . f t S-1 o'� / • t o i '� Oftt $TtJO OUT Oor • J 10I Oy . �� t7cTt�D�B sY F T foe N r88 @ 10 � "dam i@� a P -- -: • v�d q N 4 T c[ a r XT R4 it W v.iv •s = L =1 — 2t 70 A* YEE 4 YErrJ�� 77 7 ID t 44 4 T It A - - -- — - - -- - -- i-- ----- 1� - . r r 1 `\ A" TEE i 1 ' , wwwa. s. w•- w. w. w. w►. w..• r.-• r�. w... ww.+, w.:_ r.. r•.....+ rw. rr. sr.• a�..- wa.•... w.. .•w.v«a.�w+.•�w.v.a..•.a+...nu wvn.. n.•r.- .r.+»w•ww+i++..wr.r•r.ws.o..wM. wu-ar waorewr•ww. �ww.ar.wr�r.ww.w•. wrrrr.w..�, . job •��r�� ' � � A } Mr _ 1 'EY131 IN C- I l l`5�� r • 3 PROP • - „ �u,,. at. trti, r -* � a•.�e1D.9••.a�ea��.a�0et�s.ppyy _,liaw:+e�.+v^3.ewxaSS.��C[a °t �,cCA- Sr'a.S.;:�. ;- �.i�.7.'�7r.�JC��e�•�'S._�.t _la;.t•a.Yi.�I J•�a�• . . • N ci ti LOT & N M LO z o - r~ t i' ` /41� • � �caws��w .�a�rww.swr *wee..a�svasa.r�* spy. vr�.-.:: s.+ QO. e, wrrwr�i^ f+ w�•- wrmcare.. xw., mc�c9• t+ eec. w�se4s�art�e .,l�•+�r.<s�w:�.ysscr+'�,.x:u >.+���oeM�rats • ��'•.'. .. . o-. z • . =•• wsxs:+�. �w ^i,..�z:s � .. ....> ..... _ . _ .... .. .•.ti..... < <. ..,r:au^..s •..►va o x. �..: e.... a. • r n '• VQYit PI Lc Tiete ,...........,.....m,...� ._.. - e......�..,.,.�............... ..,�..a... .., .... ........._......-- ,a,.....�.... V z { k >. a- W z:. Y: f•' 9i ...�.._�........: .. _...............•...-.•-... .»..•......�.......,...,.,. - «.. .. .:.r..•...•..w•.... ,. - - - .. R w.twu.»v.tuwulv ...w.� .....- ........- ..+.,.,..w� -.: �. •..............,.•.....� - ..,,- ».._..., _....,.,. •..: w. e+.... w•.- e r.�••� +w..- ,..,......- ,....... .. >..............a..w. ,ei.moe+..a......r+.... ' �e..m. Y F F March 15., 1980 Dear Mr. Ol.on,, • T am responding to the letter of I arch 14, 1980 from your office. The ' Letter requests a respoD.se to a request by k1r. voya Piletich for lot d.i.va.sion and varian of the property at 2130 arcade st 1 am adamantly opposed to this di.visionS This. move would destroy the character of our urn* qu e* neighborhood and lead. to a hapha z and internal lot development of this area© The request also Violates 1 14aplewood or dances and has always been a by people in this community . This matter of lot di Ision in this area has been before the la co - ss p and City Council several times over the past several. years. The request for lot division of this property has been der -ied several tiimes. 1 st recently when Mr Hubert Harmon who lived at 2138 Arcade Sty. requested an internal lot di.visi.on of thi s na ture A he was denied this request by both the planning co= ssio n and the City Council. This was last spring This sort of lot di�Eion - as o d ! p letich by the pl also denied w ia.r� drop, co s on i.� and the City Council . in October 1975 Bdth the Council and the pla.nni.ng conrnissi.on recommended at. that time that property division should follow the character of the area that e-xi sts with moot homes in the areas between rb ighway # and Ro selaim This division follows the pattern of homes facing Keller Lake and homes facing IIrcad . ng e sty with properties being .div�id.ed in middle or along an internal. sewer line� The recos�aendation that was adopted by the City Council at that time read "Consideri the affect of development on the nature and character of the area i n ue tia . q s n-, the previously expressed idshes to the property' oimers for retention of that character and- the existing low density it is recon. mended. that alternative 1 mini -mum development � s p nt using existing, streets., and Frith full. compliance �.th all development requirements . p q be adopted-as the preferred method for direction of futare land use and development." Rr. Pi.leticht s request for a varience is a new attempt to get around the original planning corms. s sio n; s sugge stibn and Council acti.on�, This time however° �Ir. pi.l.eti.ch is mo ving toward ' nternal roads and a piece 3.eal lot division that would • go fa.r beyound his ear.1i.er plans. The lot di vvision would continue until the entire area's character has been destroyed. The piecemeal process` has already started with three lot divisions at 2130. and 2128. These lot divisions are not, however internal. • The request for lot di.visibnn, of this sort should be denied for many reasons, la This division request . is out of character , with the established development of the nei.�htorhood. there are m y long narrow lots facie, Keller Lake and Arcade sty Internal lot division is out of character s� With the area a 2, Internal lot' division is against the City code,, section 1005.910 that "All lots shall .abut on a di.dicated street. No street sery - ices thesel.otso 3,* :A variance action of this sort would open the rest of the area at . 21.30 -2128 to an uncontrolled development a-rid lot splitting situation. 4 A publi c road to service this small lot situation would create noi. se i traffic confusion. and inconvenience to adjoining property owners especially those on the west side of .Arcade Street that would have traffic driving directly toward theme houses 58. -The whole problem of sewer service does not allow i.nterna.l. lot splitting In 19 -72 -73 the existing property owners along Keller lake pa. fd several thousand dollars each to install a sewer to service the l- ak properties We iliere told at this time that - the sewer uras to service the lakeside properties and not a future multi - lot division si.on of the area. The capacity of the sewer was not built go ac;corrnodcate dozens of future lots. There are also assessment consideration that should be exp...ai.ned to property owners who request lot division variances There is an existing sewer on .Px,cade ' _St. that would. service Arcade St. property owners 6 o The costs of sewer road Gonstruc r adin. etc could outweigh h the benefits � g g ,� � g to the Sri or the property owner . * -There may also be subdivision restriction s that may lie hidden in the properties deeds. The limited tirae notice for a request for information has forced me to be quite sketchy in this note to you about the variance request. - I would appreciate . it if you would call one to come in to explain in rrio"I 6 , detail � using the imp of the area reasons that this vaiarmce should be denied. In fact I would Like this whole situation to be clarified so this piecemeal approach would not be suggested a nd considered year after year. _ • Gordon Gra nt (2134 .Arca.de St Q ) 774 ~ 2079 - • - I March :9, 1980 C ity oaf. Ma lewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota X5109 Attu; Geff Olson Director of Community Development K .Dear a Leff: 1 would li k e to have variance fro City Code that requires every lot to front on . the Public Street. This type of diviction is in accordance with one of proposals ho v t divide our property by Mr. Reed , City Eng. back in 1975. Even though the policy has been adopted that all future lots to be divided in the area should have frontage can the Public ri ht.away , we were e tempt. Reason for the exce is that our property is almost 7 acres in area, a is wide enough to have one ®r two roads to serve the lake fro -rit lots. according to that planning, we would at some future fl a �* dates have either 6 or 7 lots depending on alternative ed. even l ot alternative out _ 1 7 acr is very similar to two of divisions lr e dy established to the North f Most lots East of Arcade t. South from Hwy. #36, and N from P oselawn Ave., are of irregular s ��pe, and just as many without the frontage Some of th e lots . e ratite f over 1 e 1 length in correspondence to width.. Being of such shape, they have been Subject of splits in the matter of :1, 301, and 4.1 We hope you would allow our division as proposed, which is identical to the divi.sio allowed by Mr. Reed in 1975 S incerely Y Voya Piletic 2130- arcade St. St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR A CODE VARIANCE ' � The Maplewood Board Of Adjustments and Appeals will conduct a public hearing on Thursday,, April 17, 1980 at 8:15 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Maplewood Municipal Building, 1380 Frost Avenue. PETITION INITIATOR: 0wa piletich 2130 Arcade Street Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 ' REQUEST: A variance to divide h�S house ' from 'the b' lance of the property. ' PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS: 2130 Arcade Street ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER ARE INVITED TO ATTEND AND BE HEARD If you have questions Or would like further information, Call Geoff Olson at 770-4560 " ' �a \ . MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE:� City Manager Director Of Community. Development Maple Knoll Project April 10, 1980 The City Council tabled action on the proposed revision to the preliminary PUD at their April 3 meeting, 1 order to allow time for the developer to meet with the adjacent property owner to the west to discuss obtaining an access drive to Southlawn and to allow time fo� City Staff to meet with residents concerning drainage problems in the �rea. - 1 r I ko MEMORANDUM r T0: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Revision to Prel i mi.nary Planned Unit Development LOCATION: South of Radatz Avenue APPLICANT: Realty Development Services, Inc. Ajax venture Co . L" },�yIJ:<< 4 OWNER: PROJECT: Maple Knoll DATE.: March 12, 1 The applicant is requesting that Council strike conditions l.a. through 1 .d. of the previous approved preliminary planned unit development. Please refer to the enclosed letter from the applicant, dated ilarch 5, 1980. Also enclosed is the Staff report, dated January 17, 1979, describing the PUD Council approved the preliminary PUD on February 15, 1979, with the following conditions: 1. .,No building permits shall be issued, unless Council orders the following public improvement projects: a. A minimum eight inch water main in Radatz Avenue, looped through Maple Knoll and Southl awn Drive to Beam Avenue. b. Upgrading of Radatz Avenue from White Bear Avenue to proposed Southl awn Drive. c. Construction of Southlawn Drive from Radatz Avenue to Beam Avenue. d. Construction of the storm water project shown in the Maplewood Drainage Plan for Radatz. Avenue. All necessary easements shall also be dedicated to the City. This project i ncl'udes piping, pondi ng, and control devices. 2. occupancy permits shall not be issued, until project a. in condition one is completed and the first l i f t is paved in projects b. and c. of condition one. 3 Sewer and water mains within the pro shall be constructed by the developer and dedicated to the public, with necessary maintenance easements. U t i l i t i e s s hal 1 be installed under the terms of a developer's agreement with the City and bui 1 t. to City Standards. 4. Final utility and drainage plans shall be submitted _ to the City Engineer for approval. 5. All uti lines to be underground. 6. The drive to Radatz Avenue through the property to the east shall be constructed with this pro ject. An easement shall be provided to insure its exis after the property is sold. C . The floor elevation of the westerly unit must be approved b the i ` y pp y e C ty Engineer. 8. The second garage from the west on the south side of the parking lot should be moved to the north side of the parking lot and to the west to i . mprove screening of the homes to the north. 9. Any required plantings that die shall be replaced. 100 All trash to be picked up regularly. Trash shall not be allowed to accumulate on the grounds, except in the designated dumpy tern . 11. Approval by the Ramsey - Washington (Metro Watershed Board and any other appropriate agencies. 12. Approval of the preliminary PUD is in concept, only . This approval covers the type and number of units and general site layout only. This approval does not cover specific site planning details, such as grading, exact building locations, lighting, landscaping or building design. Final approval may include addi ti onal conditions, as Council feels is necessary. Deleting conditions 1. a. through 1. d. would cause the following problems: 1. Adding traffic from the project to Radatz Avenue would increase the rate of deterioration of the ,street, which is already substandard . 2. A water line would have to be brought in from White Bear Avenue. Since i t could not be looped on Radatz Avenue, the size would have to be increased to maintain enough pressure for fire protection. 3* omi tti'ng Southl Lawn Drive would limit Radatz Avenue to a long dead end, wi tIl all traffic going to the Radatz-White Bear intersection. 4. omitting the storm water improvements would increase downstream water problems. An alternative would be to run pri vi ate drives east and west to White Bear Avenue and Southl awn Drive. (see enclosed drawing) . This would involve the City condemning private access to Southlavin Drive and constructing Southlawn Drive. The government grant money could be used for these costs. This alternative would eliminate assessments and excess traffic on Radatz Avenue. The disadvantage would be the City involvement in condemning a private access. Recommendati on Staff still feels that the project as previously proposed is the best alternative. Since Council denied this project, conditions 1 . a . through 1. b. could be modified to allow for alternative plans ,while still meeting minimum City standards: 1. No building permits shall be issued, unless Council orders the following public improvement projects: a. An adequate sized and designed water ma.i n to serve the project, as determined by the Director of Public Works. 2 ti b. Upgrading of Radatz Avenue from White Bear Avenue to proposed Southl awn Drive, if Radatz Avenue is used as an access. c. Construction of Southlawn Drive from Radatz Avenue to Beam Avenue. d. Construction of the storm water project shown in the Maplewood Drainage . . Plan for Radatz Avenue. All necessary easements shall also be dedicated to the City. This project includes piping, pondi ng, and control devices. 3 V. '~ �EA.LTY VIANAGE NT SERVICESJNC. REALTY DEVELOPMENT SERV]CES, INC. 5221 Edina Industrial Boulevard Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 Phone (z2)000-5'm0. ' March 5, 1980 Mr~ Geoff Olson City Planner, City of Maplewood 1902 East County Road B ' Maplewood" Minnesota 55109 Dear Geoff: Re: Request for.Reconsideration Of PUO Conditional Approval Map-1 Map Knoll Development On behalf Of Granite City Construction Company, we respectfully re- quest that the development be placed on the agendas of the City Planning Commission and City Council of Maplewood for the purposes of amending the conditions to the preliminary PUD approval as follows. (Referring t-o the minutes of the City Council meeting dated February lS, 1979" page 3) Strike condition No. lA, lB" IC, and JD. Condit lA through ID refer to off-si�e improvements which had to be.ordered prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Maple Knoll project. Insofar as the City Council at the meeting of February 28, 1980 voted to deny the proposed off-site improvements, it would be impossible to continue with the Maple Knoll development in the absence of some amendment to these conditions 'to the prelimi- nary PUD. At the Council Meeting on February 28" 1980, various members of the City Council indicated that although they were opposed to assessing local hmmeonnters for the off-site improvements" they were not op- posed to the project per s�. Several suggestions were made h« Various Council Members effect thet alternate traffio'cirou- lation should be considered by the developer; for example, they would prefer to seethe development egressing directly on to White Bear Avenue, and/or directly On to an extension of South Lawn. The developer is quite willing to alter the proposed driveway, to make them coincide with the interests of the City. While we understand that the originally proposed driveway desig| , with its correspond- ing improvements to Radatz Avenue and �ouLh Lawn represented the ideal from a planning staff point of view" given that the City Council i,s opposed to ordering the improvements to Radatz Avenue and South Lawn, there are other alternatives which would be accept- able to'theCit» staff, Planning Commission" and City Council. "THE REALTY SEFZV1C.,,.US CC),` g""ANIES OFFICES IN MINNEAPOLIS, cv�^aowoc��sER • Mr. Geoff Olson March 5, 1980 Page 2 If the amendment to the conditions for the Maple Knoll development are approved, a number of beneficial results will follow: 1. There shall be constructed 57 additional units of housing in } the City of Maplewood satisfying a great need. 2. It will be possible to salvage the CDDG grant monies from the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development which have been earmarked for improvements to .streets in the area. 3. It will be possible to design the site so that Radatz Avenue receives a reduced amount of traffic over the original plan. Geoff, we request that this proposal be put before the Planning Commission and City Council as soon as possible, which means, if I understand the schedule correctly, the Planning Commission meeting of March 17th, and the City Council meeting of April 3rd. If you, or members of your staff, have any questions, please don't hesitate to cal l . Sincerely, REALTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, INC. C i chael . McKenna Development Representative MPM /be cc: Mary Euel Housing & Redevelopment Authority 6400 France.Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 Jack Jenkins Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 333 Sibley Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 • ," y _ e 7.tY �h . � Y r ,°, e i ` "S . � - '' yam' �• d ` i+:. `• ?,." L� • :Q'�'��:3 *8 ;?'FiYf` h � ..,•, 7,?� .:�:iti .. e. i r. 44, : , .0 ; = >5<' ..� � `�Y. > . 7fj �. .,.fie. YC�'. �' z r.. ,, 7�•0 Wc. .t?•1� . .•t......•!e11......v"ln""."r» .+.. er.�r' -- -e-r .- , r. 4ga,c : ?.y d. a�. ,... .tx.:4�. ,.i .. t•'4:. ,,,._; �' •5 .:,� .; .. P.- > - .'Y•'*•• .�,. • :p. :, �. . • '�T:� ' r f �.. . S �i .•,. -.'. '`'!R '''.' � Y'V7Yf•"_ !R,.•r �°, ; • .t.. n"°arw'T?!.�'!q!1"!4. !. �..i• =4f, e... n l`I f ,r . ".� h�+�'S .w n MA /3' EWOOD L» MAL AVE r s L El PP/ Pfl-47'rn �a AAAPLE KA L TOWNHOUSES • • PRO SED CE SB TE "C .� -� .i +e• -,) .r :.. ... �'�`� A. �. ! r. .. �� � ,a .''s. �� ..� �x X �w .•o .,w � ..r ,t • w • • 1 OHfr MA N AVENUE �►•�•/��/ //�+� le.. I' V U POSSTRI E 'ALTERNATIVE CITY OF MAPLE WOOD, MI NNESOTA RADAT Z AVENUE a SOUTH DRIV IMPROVEMENTS SCHOEL.L a MADSON INC. Eng inters a Suarvelors Hopkins Winnas SCALE- 1 "= 200' DAT£I WOVC ER *t37 MA PL EWOOD MALL � SEA III .r._. __._ _._......... ZON NG ZONI VG BC(m ''F 8C(m) L l j i 1 t t � � • •1 t A DA Z A V� UE ' ` ' ZONING ,� ......... r ........ F ZO NG R1 I AVING F ZONING W R2 eta . J Z o PROPOSED VALE AVENUE MAPLE KNOLL TOWNHOUSES � PROPt�SED FFiCE Si rE ,TONING LBC 1 ZONING F V . a �ff al v r ZONING i / e R2 r ZONING F KOHLMAN AVENUE . 3 IUE7J3 " i ORIGINAL PROPOSAL C1TT OF N1APLEVVooD , iN N�soTA RADATZ AVENUE & SOUTHLAWN DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED STREET CONSTRUCTION ---- -- ZONING BOUNDARY SCHOELL M ADSON INC. Engineers a Surveyors Hopkins , Minnesota SCALE 1 200' DATE* DECEMBER 1979 . 3 IUE7J3 " i ORIGINAL PROPOSAL . ` ^ MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and 'City Counci l FROM: Acting City Manager SUBJECT: Preliminary Planned Unit Development LOCATION: South of Rudatz Avenue/West of White Bear Avenue APPLICANTS: Granite City Construction Co. R and R Investors Realty Development Services, Inc. ' OWNER: Ajax Venture Co. PROJECT: Maple Knoll DATE: January 17" 1979 Request ' . The applicants are requesting approval of a preliminary planned unit developnxent for 57 apartment unfts. Exi'sting Land Use ' l. The subject property is a combination of all or part of two existing parcels (see enclosed property map). 2. Parcel A on the property map is D 14.84 .acre parcel with approximately 4,2`5 feet of frontege On White Bear Avenue. The applicant would eventually propose to split off ..he westerly 10.69 acres and combine this with parcel R. 3, Parcel 8 is a ,25 acre parcel with 55 feet of frontage on R8datz Avenue. 4. The combined acreage of the subject property would, therefore, be 10 acres. 5. The property 1s undeveloped, except for a house and accessory buildings on White Bear Avenue. Proposal l. The project would create 57 apartment units with the following bedroom mix: 5 - l bedroom units 32 - 2 bedroom units 20 - 3 bedroom units 57 - UNITS TOTAL 20 There would also be an additional management/laundry unit. 3. See the enclosed plan for location and design of units. 40 The units would be Subsidized Section 8 t8m1|y units. 5. Each unit has d patio and 144 Cubic foot exterior storage shed 6. There are llS parking Stalls. Fifty-eight spaces are garages and 57 are open spaces. Cit Code re stalls, of which 57 must b.e g ara g es. ] _ .' '. . . ` .7. 'rOur trash enclosures are planned adjacent to garage units, 8 An office building is shown fronting oU White Bear Avenue. This building is ,planned for future use and is not part of the current application. The Only drive on the office property to be constructed with the apartment is the easterly access drive . to Radatz 'Avenu8. 3urroundi La d Us l. The property to the north is occupied by single family homes front* ng on Radatz Avenue. Th.is land is zoned F, Farm Residential and is designated as RL, Low Density Residential on the Land Use Plan. 2. The property �o the east fronts on White Bear Avenue, It is zoned F, Farm Residential and is designated as L3C, Limited Service Commercial use. The owner is proposing to develop this land into a future office building. 3. The property t0 the South is.wetlands. It is zoned F, Farm Residential and designated On the Plan for Open Space use. The Maplewood Drainage Plan - designates these wetlands, which also extend into the subject property, as storm water stora sites. 4. The property ±o the west is 8 large undeveloped parcel with a single family home fronting on Radatz Avenue. It is zoned F, Farm Residential and designated for Low Densil'- Residential use on the Cit1Y Land Use Plan. Past Actions l. 5-11- 72: The Cftv Council denied a PUD for 15 acre parcel" which included the subject property. The PUO proposed a high rise, four 3 story apartments, an office building, and commercial developrient. 2. 10-21-74; Ajax Venture Company proposed a rezoning from F" Farm Residence to BC, Business Commercial Of the 5.3 acres of the subject property fronting On White Bear Avenue. This case was tabled by the Planning Commission for further study on the use of conditional zoning. 3. 4-21-75: The Planning Commission recommended denial of the rezoning. 4. 6-21-75: The City Council reviewed a proposal by Ramsey .County for acquisition Of Various properties adjacent to Ditch 18. The County proposes to acquire property in the general area of the subject property for drainage as well as open space purposes. As a part of this program, the County included the .westerly 2/3 of the subject property as part of that area to be acquired. The City approved the overall County project and further recommended the inclusion of the easterly 1/3 Of the subject property. Ramsey County sub- sequently did not include this additional five acres in the Ditch 18 program. 5. 7-l7-75: The City Council considered the re Based on the following find- ings, recommended by the Planning Commission, the Council denied the zone change: a. The proposed zoning would be contrary to the land use designation indicated in the Compreheneisve Plan; b. The implied commercial development would be out of keeping with the land use limitations for this particular vicinity that were intended by the Comprehensive Plan- 2 -- --'-�' -- - --`' ------` --- '-------°- --------- -~'---~---- '-- - - i c. ` The ienpl i ed commercial develo ment of extensive retail o erati o p p nwould be premature in terms of developrnerct of adjacent areas and availabilit of public services and this would compound the existing traffic eongesti on . d. The zoning request is potentially detrimental to the resentl e'x'isting n p y g single family nature of the adjacent - areas. e. The avai 1 abi 1 i ty of other business commercial areas be looked at. f. It is felt that an LBC or CO classification most .closet conforms to y t e LSC indicated in the Maplewood Plan and, therefore, it, is recommended that such c l a s s i f i c a t i o n be considered. 6. 10- 20 -75: The Planning Commission considered a special use permit for Ajax Venture Company to develop a 15 acre parcel with a four story office structure and a 140 unit apartment bui 1 di ng . This item was tabled until November 3, 1975. k 7. 11-- 3--75: The special use permit was again tabled pending action by the Cit Council on the zoning for the south s i d e of Beam-Avenue. . . 84. 6- 21 -76: The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council" \approval as a Planned Unit Development concept, and that further approval be required based on the following findings: a. That the Applicant's proposal is within the RL density. b. That the proposed development does not conflict with either proposed Rm or the existing R-1 zoning on Radatz . c. The office building is in accordance with the LSC designation. . e. A sizable area would be dedicated as ace. open s P p 9. 8-15-77: The Planning Commission considered a new plan for .72 apartments in six and eight unit bui 1 di ngs , with a four story office building on White Bear Avenue. The Commission directed Staff to prepare a modification to the RL and poss i bl.y Rm definitions of the Comprehensive Plan. 10. 12 -8 -77: The City Council approved an amendriient to the Comprehensive Plan that established a new RLE District (see planning cons i derati ons) . 11. 2- 2--78: The City Council amended the Land Use Plan for the west eleven acres of the subject property from RL, Low Density Residential to RLE , Low Density Residential Extended, 12. 2- 28 -78: The County Board deleted this parcel from their open space acquisition program. P1 anni ng Considerations 1. The property is designated for RLE , Residential Lower Density Extended use, Pages 143 -144 of the Land Use Plan stated that: 3 .. . . . . . ..` ' . ' . . . . ^ ' "This classification for residential use allows for more concentrated densities Of population within defined parts of a given development area while maintaining an average population density of 14 people per -net residential acre w the entire area being considered~ The maxfnxon density Of any Segment of the develop - ` ment shall be approved by the City Council, based on the area Of natural features to be preserved an"d the qualf*t«'of Site,andbuilding design. � This classification is primarily designed to allow for the controlled use Of low density apartments and/or townhouse type units, with the application and ,ap /rnval Of such development being subject �n meeting all of the following conditions: l. Where it 1s necessary t0 cluster units in Order to preserve valu.able natural features, such as wOodlotS wetlands, Or areas of unusual topo- g raph y or natural features, and 2. Where the overall density of the total development will not exceed 14 people per net acre, and 3. Where Suchdevelopment is part of a Planned Unit Development, and 4. Provided that such units are of a Scale, design, and location that . is compatible with Single family homes, located in any adjacent RL area." 2. Staff feels that under our present`ordfnances, the four criteria under the RLE district are met. 3. The proposed densit is at the maximum allowed densit of 14 people/net acre. 4. The proposed density is based on defining the units as apartments, rather than townhOus Under our present ordinance, the units are defined as apartments. Staff feels that they should be defined as townhouses. Staff has proposed an amendment to clarify this definition. 5, The Land Use plan assumes , that townhouses produce more people than apartments. This means that the number of units proposed Would have to be reduced to keep the population density at 14 people/net acre, if these units were defined as townhouses. G. The east part of the property, where the office building is proposed, is desi foir LSC, Limited Service Commercia-1 use. 7. The subject property 1S zoned F,Farm Residential 8. The Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed Board gave concept approval to this project On January 4, 1979 /see enclosed letter). 9. A permit will be required from the City by the Department of Natural Resources for the storm sewer outlets into the wetlands. The DNR also wants to review the final grad plan. lO. A permit from. the Corps of Engineers has be(.nn approved /See enclosed let�ter\. � ' Envii,on-mental Considerations ]. Refer to the enclosed drainage plaD whi,ch shows contours,, wetlands,, and flood- plain. Unfortunately, final contours, are not shown. This makes it impossible to determine how much filling is proposed. 2. Several units are proposed to encroach on the'floUdplain. The flOodpldin shown 1s the ultimate level after construction of pOnd1ngfaCil The existing floodplain is below the ultimate level. 3. There is a significant wetland on the property that is part of the County Ditch 18 system. There is some minor enCroachment Of wetlands /See "edge Of ' swamp" line On the drainage plan). 4. The Soil Conservation Service has reviewed . this proposal and recommends approval, subject to conditions. They had previously recommended denial, but Changed their Opin1on after reviewing o Current plan. 5. Significant stands of trees are Shown on the Drainage Plan. Several large oaks are proposed to he removed. D. The Ramsey County Parks and Open Space Staff rev1ewed the proposed site plan and "would not recommend changing the previous decision to delete this parcel from the open space site" /See enclosed letter of 12-4-78\. Public Works ConSideratiOns l. Sanitary sewer is available for both office and residential use. Sewer is in White Bear Avenue and there are two Systems in Radatz Avenue. One flows east and One flows west. 2. The proposed grade of the westerly unit may be too low for Sewer service. This can be adiusted on the final plan. 3. Water will have to be extended from White Bear Avenue, along Radatz Avenue, ' and looped through the project to proposed Southlawn Drive and finally ' connecting to the existing line in Beam Avenue. 40 Public streets terminate at Radatz Avenue and White Bear Avenue. The question arises as to the ownership Of the water and sewer lines through the pUD. Staff recommends that the sewer and water main be dedicated to the public and the appropriate easements be obtained in acc with thefinal plan. 5. Radatz Avenue should be upgraded, including water and storm sewer. Southlawn Drive should be constructed from Radatz z to Beam Avenue. The purpose of this is to provide a proper street to handle the increased and existing traffic, to eliminate the high maintenance cost and safety hazard of a long dead end street, to provide better traffic circulation, and t0 loop the water 6. The Maplewood Drainage Plan proposes a series of ponds that inolude the wet- lands On the subject property. The Plan also proposes a storm sewer in R.adatz Avenue that would drain into these ponds. 5 . . �r '7. B Engineering has completed a preliminary design for the drainage system in the area (see enclosed report dated 12-17-78). The proposed floodplain is -'^the'5a�e as shown in the applicant's plan. The two proposed ponds are in- undation ponds, rather than storage ponds. Water would only pond during the heav storms. The natural marsh would be preserved for the rest of the y ear. 8. The second building from the east1S located within the high, water line of the proposed pond' g. The applicant is proposing to fill in part of the planned flOodplain and exCavate from other areas to maintain the same storage capaci ty. This should be shown on the final grading plan. Barr Engineering has stated that the proposed filling would have no significant affect on flood Storage capacity. lO. The Casey Lake outlet structure discussed in the Barr Study should eventually be constructed with the ultimate but fS not necessary for'this proposal ` ` ll. The enclosed letter from Barr Engineer, dated January ll 1979, describes the volume Of run-off that would be caused by this project and states that" "This proposed development will not noticeably affect the peak rate of discharge downs tr8am . ." Recommenda ti on Approv Of the proposed preliminary planned unit development, based On the following: l. The project would be consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan. 2. The units are Of a scale" design, and location that is compatMe with adjacent single family homes. Approval is based on the following conditions: ' l. NO building-permits shall be issued, unless Council orders the following public improvement projects: a. A minimum .eight inch water main in Radatz Avenue" looped through Maple Knoll and Southlawn Drive to Beam Avenue. b. Upgrading Of Radatz Avenue from White Bear Avenue to proposed Southl8wn Dri ve. C. Construction of Southlawn Drive from Radatz Avenue to Beam Avenue. d. COnStruCt�On of the storm water project shown in the Maplewood Drainage Plan for Radatz Avenue. All necessary easements shall also be dedicated to the City. This project includes piping, pOnding and control devices. 2. Occupancy permits shall not be 1ssued project a. 1n, condition one 1s completed and the first lift is paved in projects b.and C. of condition one. 3. Sewer and water mains within the project Shall be constructed by the' developer and dedicated to the public, with necesary maintenance easements. Utflitjes shall be installed under the terns of J developer's agreement with the CfL« and built to City Standards. ~ _' G . . ' . . . . ' . 4. Final U|1lftV and drainage plans Shall be submitted to the Cf ty Engineer for . approval, ' 5. All utility lines to be underground, . 6. The drive tO Radatz Avenue through the property to the east Shall he constructed ' with this project. An easement Shall be provided to insure its existence after the property is sOld, 7. The floor elevation of the westerly unit must be approved by the City Engineer. ' 8. The second garage from the west On the south Side of the parking lot should ' be moved to the north side of the parking lot and to the West to improve screening Of the homes to the north. 9. Any required plantings that die shall be replaced. lO. All trash to be picked up regularly. Trash shall not be allowed to accumulate on the grounds" except in the designated dumpSterS. ' ll. Approval of the preliminary PUD is in concept.only' This approv covers the type and number of units and general site layout Only. This approval does not cover specific site planning details, such as grading, exact building locations, lighting, ]andscaping, or building design. Ffnul approval may include _additfonal conditions, as Council feels is necessary. . Ooo��1Ic' �r�cc�o�-__�____ e l l 7 . ' �� WHITE BE/\R L COUNTY ROAD D LY 01A cc LL BEAM AV Uj cc 7—f Bill C < ------------- "ele PROPOSED PUD cr co XTIA [P�T AVE. GERVAIS AVE. I LN=G R. r.,STLF- _JF A V E. E COPE AVE. LAURIEJ =RD < Li RID cr �L � �RS T -Z �5) I ; �:: I =[E:: 9 > u' F._. c- _,1 F pAULM. PINK TETITIONER - ' PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT |RE WEST OF WHIT[ BEAR AVENUE SOUTH OF RADATZ AVENUE: 0 c) o '�-jl 7�0-)-j RADA"' -F' 7 75 I EIC) loo loc.) too 2-C) 0 3 3 4 o.-c- wr .4 0 .44 1 C.,xr- OC- -CIO .70 a� , � PARCEL ' r .. 00 #- A ,; O G 70 C> 40 E ll! 4 E ARCEL B /I Zline 0 P.O. Box 21.28 St. Paul, Minne-sota 55109 Januar 8,' 1979. Mr. Michael P. McKenna Development Representative Realit Mana Services, Inc. 7300 Franc*e Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 Re: The Maple•Knoll Development in Maplewood Dear Mr. McKenna., Based on landscape plans, surve plans and site plans submitted to.. the District as of Januar 4,, 1979, the Board of Mana conceptuall approves the development. This approval, however,, is not a permit for construction. A g radin g plan showin existin and proposed contours must be submitted to the District for .its review and approval as part of the Information re for a permit application. Also, this g radin g . plan must show locations where temporar erosion control facilities will be installed and maintained durin the construction phase until restoration d is completed and.established. Erosion control facilities usuall are comprised of staked ha installed in locations so that all storm water runoff from the construction site is channeled throu such facilities. 1 re Y7 S-t- e-V n M. Klein BARR ENGINEERING CO. En for the District SMK/am c.* Mr. Geoffre Olson,, Director of Communit Developmenit, City of Maplewood �amse Metro Wat -District 'V 10 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY . ST. PAUL- DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1135 U, S. POST OFFICE 6 C HOUSE ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF: NCSCO-GR (79-NO218-29) Michael P. McKenna Development Representative Realt Development Service Inc. 7300 France Avenue So. Edina, Minnesota 55435 4 Januar 1979 Re: Knoll Development Maplewood, -Minnesota Dear Mr. McKenna: We have reviewed the information provided us concernin the above referenced pro The work y ou propose at the location stated above is authorized b an existing nationwide Department of the Army permit, provided the -work is accomplished in compliance with the inclosed conditions and mana practices. This letter of confirmation is valid onl for the pro referenced above. Tlieref 'ore, if an chan in desi location, or purpose is contemplated, contact this office at 612 -72'--'558, to avoid accomplish ment of work which ma be in violation of Federal law. It is y our responsibilit to insure that the work complies with the inclosed conditions. You must also obtain an re State, local, or other authorization if y ou have not alread done so. , If y ou have an q uestions, please call Ken Kadlec at 612 725-7804 Sincerely, -1 D. PARSONS 2 Incl WILLIA� As stated Chief, General Re Branch Construction - Operations Division Cop furnished: Mr. Geoffre Olson Department of Communit Development Cit of Maplewood CONDITIONS AND MT ANA.GEi ENT PRACTICES OF NATIONWIDE PERMI i S To 111NI: IIZE THE ADVERSE EFFECTS of THE DISCIL RGE of DREDGED OR FILL 1 11 1A T ERIAL ON THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT CONDITIONS: (1) That the discharge will_ not destroy a threatened or endangered species as identified under the Endangered Species Act, or endanger the critical habitat of such species; (2) That the discharge will consist of suitable material free from toxic pollutants in other than trace quantities; (3) That the fill created by the discharge will be properly main - tained to prevent erosion and other non -point sources of pollution; (4) . That the discharge will not occur in a component of the National. Wild and Scenic Rivers System or in a component of a State wild and Scenic river system; MANAGMENT' PRACTICES : (1) Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States should be avoided or minimized through the use of other practical alternatives; (2) Discharges in spawning areas during spawning seasons should be avoided; (3) Discharges should not restrict or impede the movement of aquatic species indigenous to the waters or the passage of normal or expected high flows or cause the relocation of the waters (unless the primary purpose of the fill is to impound waters) ; (4) If the discharge creates an impoundment water, adverse impacts on the aquatic system caused by the accelerated passage of water and /or the restriction of its flow, should be minimized; -_ (5) Discharges in'wetlands areas should be avoided; (b) Leavy equipment working in wetlands should be placed on mats; (7) Discharges into breeding and nesting areas for migratory water- fowl-should be avoided; and (8) All temporary fills should be removed in their entirety, t a 4 • This determination is in accordance with CFR Title 33, 323.4 -2(a) (1) which authorizes. dischar into ,. non tid a l rivers, streams, X and their impoundments includin ad wetlands that are located above the headwate.rs. 323.4-2(a) (2) which authorizes dischar into natural lakes, includin their a d j acent wetlands, that are less than 10 acres in surface area and that are fed or drained b a river or stream above the headwaters. In the ' absence of adjacent wetlands, the surface area of a lake shall be determined at the ordinar hi watermark, 3-23.4-2(a)(3) which authorizes dischar into natural lakes., includin their adjacent wetlands, that are less than 10 acres in surface area . a n i d that al`e solated and no part of a Turf ace river or stream. In the absence of ad wetlands, the surface area of a lake shall be--deter- mined at the ordinar hi watermark, 323.4-2(a) (4) which authorizes dischar into.n.ontildal waters of the United states, includin wetlands, other than isolated l.akes lar than 10 acres that are not part of -a surface tributar s to interst waters or navi waters of the United States. 3234 -3(a) (1 ) which authorizes dred or fill material placed as backf ill or beddin for utilit line crossin provided there is no chan in preconstruction bottom contours (excess materials must be removed to an upland disposal area) . A "utilit line' is defined as an pipe or pipeline for the trzinsportation of an g aseous, li li or slurr substance, for an purpose, and an cab.]..e, line, or wire for the trans- mission for an purpose of electrical ener telephone and tele messa and radio and television communication. However, dischar which w ill occur in the proximit of a public water suppl intake or in areas of concentrated shellfish production and dis which will L the movement of a life which exists i ts in the waterbod a-r,.-.1- no L' authorized b thi's nationwide permit. 323.4-3(a) (2) which authorizes material dischar for bank stabilization, provided that the bank stabilization activit is less than 500 feet in len is necessar for erosion prevention, and is limited to less than an avera of one cubic y ard per runnin foot alon the bank, provided further that no material for bank stabilLizaLion is placed in an wetland area, and provided further that no material is placed in an localit or in an manner so as to impair surface water flow into or out of an wetland area. However, dischar which will occur in the proximit of a public water suppl intake or in areas of concentrated shellfish produc-tion; and dischar which will disrupt the movement of a life which exists in the waterbod are not authorized b this nationwide permit. In c l 2 RAMSEY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Mid-America Bank Buildin 1827 North Saint POL11 Road Maplewood., Minnesota 55109 Telephone (612) 777-0127 MINNESOTA SOIL. AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS Januar 16, 1979 46 TO: Supervisors, RwT.ise Soil and Water Conservation District FR01 Duane If.. Zxvi e r s SUBJECT: Review of Additional Information on Revised Plat of Paul Pink, Planned Urban Development at Radatz and Vfliite Bear A renue in !,.faplewood, 11r, Stan X. 'i 'ndland has reviewed and sur)-mmarized additional !P information that has becone available since- this report of December 7, 1970", and has sent it to the Ramse Soil and 'i'later Conservation District Board for its approval. We accept his re-port, 'lVe enphasize that the F.amse Soil and Vi7ater Conservation Distr_iCt has no re function and can onl make recorraendatiorls. At this tire we recomnnend conceptual approval for the proposed plat provided that the eastern most buildin are relocated to reduce the amount of fill in the adjacent wetland and the floodplain area, The Board will examine the final g rading plan before recommendin final approval., Sincerel P 1 .Duane Zwiers t.2 Plat Review Co=lottee AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL -CONSERVATION SERVICE 1827 No. S-L. Paul Road, 11va pie i-,,rood, 111-rin-e sota 55109 Januar 17, 1979 0 TO * Supervisors, Ramse Soil and Water Conservation District' SUBJECT: Sui,.mnnr of Additional Infornation on the 111aple Kaioll Development (Paul pi in Yb-plevToodo C3 Additiollia ii-if ormation concernion thi s plat has bt-1->.com, . available t he Inf omati- on add2:&esses s1nece the re-T)ort dated -2-2-8-78 waS PreT,)a-J"_ed, T the e - t1he- f as s. oci at- e d with t.'hl s -plat wi 1_1 have on st- ormllwate r -�'ormiation is storge, asite; -^.3 proposed for the areak. TAucl of this m_ con t-atined in th-llee letters sent b-v John Dickson of Barr 'Emulneering t0 th e� Cit of ILAaplewoodl and to Alke 1A1,cKen,.na of Realt Develo.f.- o Servl"C"S. Inch.. The plat ims also disnussed at the o-lk'fice liuith 1,b% .-% -T-1 0 !%A!c;Kenna on Decer!llber 2_16, In/78 and with Steve Klein. irom Barr i-Imppmee-,rin 0. 4- (represe--ntin-1-3 Rai-i-L.z-�e _1.*'_,etro I'Vatershed Distri I on Januar 11 19790 A brief summiar of the three letters (copies are attached) is r;,1v,1--_:m beilow - t_1 0 11 Letter to '311.1 Hither, Cit of !�..'-1--l"plewood, dated 12-17-78. I I C- leti..er reco.mme'rids comibinii.-i the 5 storrimate.". storau_e f onds an, p ro p o se d for t-Ile area (Ildent-if.'*Lc-.�d ilyl t1file 7_1'_,a--r)1ewoor_1 Drama ; e L rY a t o 7, see f � J b Barr F�ne-Inee',Lmn 11.-ito too lar;ger pondi'-nic, sito ilr ; u re prepa U C_j �__` #2 of this 1r%-.,,',+Ver. The proposed floodpla 1 *n elevat 4- ion for the weste-l�-:;. pond i's 0/06 and fo-.-#--% the eastern POnd is 91551. Barr '1_,In recommnends no buildin "De located lower than 907 arol..-)d the -ti-,,4,,,,Stern pond and 916 aroLLnd U'-he eastern pond. The Draina..,,e Plar,. (prov i_ ded b Paul Pink and Associates) for the 31, Dle Knoll DeveloDament indicates that t'Irle buildiin;-fs that would adjacent to the eastern pond wl* 11 be atl- a mi F. nipaum of 919 and those ad iacen--'G to the western pond at a rolinim-Um of 912, The letter further indjicates that the antici-pa ted amnunt of encroach- rnerit b fill on "L.he wetland and the Iflood'-pla.i'm of both ponds will not have a si effect on the flood"plain elevation ac to maintain the proposed sto.:�a capacit 2) Letter to Geoff Olson, Cit of llap.lewood, Januair 11, 1971-),* If the proposed nioll Il)evelopment, is constructed prior to installa•tion the t-vio p r o posed )ropoo-ed storimmter stora basins, the increases lixi in vome of runoff and the peak rate of rimoff fro.�i Tn the Develoment will - have a ne lllio�ible immact on ni dmstream, storm basinS- and on -t pe,,ah D 1-1) rate of dischar do,.,r.nstream of the local v'riaters-11hed. Pa 2 1/17/79 L -ter to 1like 11cKernia, Realt Development Services, Inc., dated et It December 7, 1978% -ho This letter 'indicates that t build n sites, as currentl pro- posed, will riot be flooded b tine 100 y ear storrri event under exi stilri conditions 'tions that w*11 exist after the two proposed pondina s ite* or wider condi s 1 S are constructed, Sur,uriar Information available at this time ir-dicates that the proposed development -aill riot adversel affect stormi-oiater stora capacit on the site or doaiistream; that the proposed buildin sites are not in dan of -bein flooded b the 100 y ear storm event under existin conditions or under condi Uons ey.- to e,.,,-,I*st aft(--.-,r the two proposed storrm��vrater st-ora bas* structed, ins are con In addition to the above informatuion,' the amount of the wetland surface area to be filled ma be roughl estimated b the location of the "Line of- enhLanced natural vecTe-luation" locateld on the LandscaDe Plan 4 , -1-es). Using this indicator, i was (provided b Paul Pink and Asso*ciau 0 1 determined approximate-l .1 to .2 acre of w"O.Itland surface area will be -e reduction in the l '.,,lould cause ver litt.L affected b fill. This anowat l., i, 7-etland's potential to assimilate storm.zncter nutrients.. usirlr:r the salme- criteria, it can be seen, b comnpar*n t' rh-' "line of erAianced natural 3. ve tation" fora the Landscape Plan to the floodplain. elevation lines on the Draina Plan t p-xrovided b Paul Pink and Associates), that the reatesu amo,-mt of fill placed irl the '4C1ocd-Qla..*.n is" due to the% locatlion g of the two build-ini on the east side of the pla-1E. Some ad'us+ments in thel r OC ,- 1 4- * should be made -1to reduc(, the amolant of f 1* 11 needed 1 C" '11 1.n from the floodplain, to construct them anal to remove one bui ld- 1 In g eneral., plans f this development and subse data g enerat,-�d b Barr En indicate this proposed plat has few sericus problemas. A fin,,z),.1 g rading plan would allow a more accurate assessment to be made. Sincerel 16, Stan We, land D1* strict Conservatlonist RA[4" TY PA KS & OPEN S PAC E D S ...... :.. i 2010 Wl)lte Bear Avenue Telephone (f t2) 770 -1351 � rCou t. Pain Minnesota 55109 Bernard L. Edmonds Director December 4, 1978 Mr. Geoff Olson, Planner City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Olson: Our staff has reviewed the current plan for Maple Knoll, by Paul Pink and Associates, dated September 29, 1978. the find that this pl is cons i s tent with the Ramsey County open Space concept for County Ditch 118. The County acquisition of this parcel (12) was del eted when the prev ioUs plan for the property showed preservation of the entire love area as open space. The current plan i.s essentially the same as the previous one in that respect. Therefore, the County Parks and Open Space staff would not recommend changing the previous decision to delete this parcel from the. open space site. Sir cerely, Bernard L. Edmonds Director of Parks and open Space BLE:ama BA RR, ENGINEERING COU CON!� J ULTING HYDRAULIC -ENG1NE.EF?S 0OUGLAS W. PARR 61100 rf4ANCr_ AVFtAL)K SOUY11 j( U . DICKSON MINNLAPOLIS, MINNUSOVA 5%A35 14. f4OLSA1MER YCLEPHONC (ARM^ 612) 920-0639 LAWRENC16: W. GUMOV. LCONARD J. K14FMCR C)WNNl% C. PALMER WAURCH W. HANSON December 17, 1.978 Mr. Bill Bittner Director of Ptibl.ic Works and En Cit of Maplewood 1902 East Count Road B Maplewood, Minnesota Dear Mr. Bittner: We have completed a preliminar desi for the draina s in the area g enerall y bounded b Beam Avenue on the north., Count Road C on the south, the cit limits on the east, and Count Ditch 18 on the west, Attached is Fi 1 which shows the limits of the stud area. The proposed Maplewood Knoll Townhouse Development is located within this area. This preliminar desi consisted of the review of the previous calculations which were computed for the preparation of the 1aplewood Drainage Plan, evaluation of an chan in the land use that has occurred since the Dra'J...nage CDO Plan was prepared, and detailed field surve to verif the ac of the 4-foot contour interval topo maps. Immediatel upstream of this drainage area is Case Lake. Case Lake is located prim cit aril within the limits of the Cit of North St. Paul It was assumed, as a part of this stud that the maximum discharge from Case Lake will be limited to 15 cubic feet per second which re a new outlet struc,"--ure be installed for Case Lake. This re is in accordance with the H Anal of Lakes and Open Space in Raw.,_.e Count prepared in 1975. From Case Lake, it is proposed that the draina would consist- Primaril of an open chan-riel flowinar almost due west under White Bear Avenue and into the area presentl proposed to be developed into the Maplewood Knoll Townhouse Dev We have carefull anal this area based on more detailed field information and have determined that based on the topo it would be more desirable to have two lar stora basins than the five small basins shown in the. Maplewood Drainage • Plan.. Sli less stora is re due to the efficienc of havin less basins. Also b reducin the number of basins to two it will re less work in the floodplain and, therefore, less of an environmental impact on the wetland area. Fi 2 shows the results of the preliminar desi for this area,. The eastern stora basin -re 91� acre-feet of storm water stora for the 100- frequenc storm. To obtain the re 9.5 acre-feet of storm 'water stora water would be stored up to elevation 914-7. Therefore, we recommend that the flood level be established at elevation 915 with a minimum buildin level of elevation 916 adjacent to this pondin site,. This would re a restriction dike with a top elevation of 916. A 21-- inch corru metal pipe should be placed throu t1his dike to allow E. Mr. Bill Bi'ttner Pa 2 17, 1978 the smaller stoniis and low flows to pass throu without an appreciable f looding. The western pondin site. re 7 acre-feet of storm water stora volume. To obtain the 7 acre-feet of storm water stora water will b e stored up to elevation 905.5. We recommend that the flood level be set at elevation 906 and that all buildin constructed adjacent to this stora site be above elevation 907. To obtain the desired stora it -will re constructing a 'dike at the approximate location shown on the attached Fi 2. This dike should be constructed with a top elevation of 907. There should be a 24-inch corru metal pipe runnin throu this dike to allow small storms and low flows to pass throu without causin an inundation of the floodplain. The storm sewer on Radatz Avenue Draina Plan. From Radatz Avenue to sewer size has been reduced from a 33, field infoririatio�nb This 30-inch pipe 902 contour line to prevent a serious dischar .Is. the same as shown in the Maplewood the 5 stora site the re storm. C> -inch to a 30-inch based on more detailed should extend approximatel to the problem with erosion durin peak The attached Fi 2 shows the land owned b the Maplewood Knoll Development and also the land that is proposed to be included in the RamS E'I C ount y Open Space. The land that the have alread ac is shoxm as shaded. We have ana'i. the effect that the proposed Maplewood Knoll Development will have on the floodplain. One of the buildin is shown located sli into the floodplain and four other buildin C--:re located close enough to c the floodplain t`-iat the side slope of the fill necessar to construct the buildin will encroach slightl into the floodplain. Anal the effect of this encroachment, we have determined that for the eastern storage basin, the actual level of the 100- event would raise sli "Iess than one- half inch. Considerin that the computed floodplain is at elevation 914.7 and the recommended floodplain is proposed at elevation 915, this encroachment is not si For the western stora basin, the encroachment into the floodplain would amount in approxmatel 3/3-inch rise in the floodplai'n. This-proposed stora site has a computed flood level. is at elevation 905.5 and a recommended floodplain at elevation 906, therfore, the 3/8-inch increase in flood level is not si Should y ou "'nave an qu est-ions pertainin to this preliminar 'desi please contact me.. Yours trul John D. Dickson J IUD/ am r r North Beam Av • Watershed Area • • 4 _ Ra da t z Avenue _ > co • Jc t • . ; ,. --�. -- -._,.� - Casey i • P • Lake z Koh 1 man /avenue 1 County d licit Y # L am._._. -. • CL Y • • �r , • o ..A.r . FIGURE 1 • Barr E n g i n e e r i n g Co • - . ... .. !A.'^."""' .. �...,r. 1 `�..1V7••,•*'t7'fT•o •tN'�+••shw..w •�r...T.s.�,+Z�.�p.�.r.._.....� .... «:.."�' �t:...' i' ri.; f�it7lt" �' w��MMr "r'•74er+n'!rNO+c�►a'Sr6•I JM•+r:':.'J!]IAtR1�AaR 7a6 wa+++.or+ay..w: ..... «. .. _ -4• | RADATZ AVE . / ----- ' . .... .. , . ) KOHLMAN AVE. ` CITY orwApuseouo CO. DiT / - — / / . . . / BAR ENGINEERING CO. v BARR ENGINEERING Co. CONSULTING HYDRAULIC ENGINEERS DOUGLAS W. BARR 6800 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH JOHN D. DICKSON MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55435 L. R. MOL.SATHER TELEPHONE .(AREA 612) 920-0655 ALLAN GEBHARD LAWRENCE W. GUBBE .LEONARD J. KREMER DENNIS E. PALMER WARREN W. HANSON January 11, 1979 Mr. Geoffrey Olson Director of Community Development City. of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Re: The Maple Knoll Development in Maplewood Dear Mr. Olson: It has been brought to my attention that the City is concerned about the effect of the above described development on the downstream watershed, in terms of store, water runoff. If the storm water storage basins indicated for the area are not constructed prior to development of this project for the critical 100 -year storm, my computations indicate that the increased volume of runoff would be .2 of an acre - -foot, and the peak rate of runoff for the local watershed would be increased by ,approximately 5 cf s . The effect of this development on downstream storage basins will be negligible. This proposed development will not noticeably f f ect the peak rate of dis- charge downstream of the immediate local watershed. If you have any questions, please contact me at 920 -0655. Sincerely, r John D. DICI:.Son BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY JDD /rdb cc: Mike McKenna Stan Wendland 1 Y E'NGINEERING CO. 13A R CO NSULTING t►()t)(n1.A i W. 11AIM )011N L) ()1C J I. IIn11 1 1 AV! N1► /. S 0 1111/ I_ It. h1 O SAIHC14 NI N 1%4.IS M AI.LAN Gt.13t4AI40 TI.LCPHONC (A1rt_A G 121 8:11 1._AW44C.NCf: W. GUMIC' t.E0NA140 J. KftCM It' lt I'?CNN1`i t:. I'ALMC$4 WAJIMEN W. NANUON 19 8 I A j Realty Develop)1)ent Servic(-_1s, Inc. 7300 France AvenLiel south Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 Attn : Mr. Mi.chael P. McKenna Devel.ol)ment Relprese-n to Live Re: Maplewood Development Gentlemen: We have reviewed your proposed devc3-to,)I in Maplekljood generally -located i)etween Koda tz Avenue and Kohln)an Aven►_ie �md between Sotlthlawn Drive and write Bear Avenue. As you are a`�Tare, we D y �� ave previoL)sly completed a � drolo sic Analysis o Lzfl';.es and Opel, Space ill I;<)1,�sc..y ,oc�rLty �)))d �� Drainage Plan for the city o t i"laple-wood . These studies were com , �le-ted i ll 1974 and 197 5. 13ot�; of t s w ere p1 aiii)it1� ; S t Ild _ 1 C' Lo })rovide nn orderly ht:J1jd.1i.z� et flood waters wit -h.; n the geographic bou)idar.ies of the sLudy l rl i_ts. Your proposed developIl is in - cordanc-e with these planning; studies for the handling of surface runoff waLcr. The- 100- -yec-ir flood levels in your area were noL determined as a part of Studies. Therefore, we have cal- culated what the 100 --year flood level is in this area. Under existing condi- tions the proposed building sites are <il)ove the 100 -year flood level. If the restrictions are constructed in the w."'ten,iay as proposed to" create the two inundation areas, your proposed build Loft's will still be above the revised loo --year flood level. The proposed filling necessary to create t11e illUnd(3lion areas is in r_zccordance Wit the Maplewood Uraina�.,e Man al w<�.� considered i.n the deter- - ini_n�:iLion of t he flood level. An ni- Inor f _il_11_11p, th way e necessar - Y y to ('orlli }l.ece w,):l lcw,ays and opell Spac o. adj;)c(.1j1t- V.() hll i_ld i -ii�vs w i.11 not leave an adverse c:f t ec t aii the. f food s Lorage cap; p; - ic i t of the :iiltlnda tion area. )'() Lrc.1 r 11Z John I). Dickson JDD /yc ~ ' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT Notice is hereby given that the Maplewood City Council at its meeting Of Thursday, April 3 7980 at 8:15 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Maolewood Municipal Building, located at l3BO Frost Avenue, MaplewoOd,' MiAnesotawill consider and publicly hear the re-quest for an amendment to a Special Use Permit for a preliminary Planned Unit Development. PROPOSAL. LOCATION: Parcel 2 The E 200 feet of the W 1685 feet of the N 200 feet of that part of the N 112 of the SW 1/4 of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, lying South Of Radatz Avenue, according to the survey thereof. Realty Management Services, Inc. 5221 Edina Industrial Boulevard Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 To amendment an approved preliminary Planned Unit Development for 57 apartment units. Parcel l All tha1 part ofthe N 112 Of SW 1/4 of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, lying S of Radatz Avenue" W of the Centerline of White Bear Avenue. Except the N 200 feet except Subject a n exoep feet. u J�� . to White Bear Ave ' nue according to the survey thereof. Parcel 3 The E 55 feet of the W 665 feet of the N 200 feet of that part of the N 112 Of the 3W l/4 Of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, lying south Of Radatz Avenue, accordin to the surve thereof. MORE C01-1MONLy DESCRIBED AS: A parcel of land located south of . Radatz Avenue and west of White Bear ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER ARE INVITED TO ATTEND AND BE HEARD CITY OF MAPLEWOOD" MINNESOTA ~-~ �� ~ ' / /~ 0- d O ^ 8 "NEW BUSINESS A. Revision to Preliminary PUD- Maple Knoll (Radatz Avenue) Secretary Olson said the applicant i s requesting the Council remove conditions l. a. through l.d. of the-previously approved Planned Unit Development. Staff is recommending modification Of the first two conditions as outlined in their report, Commf3sio�er Pellfsh said he thought with the original proposal, there was negative discussion as to having access to the site from White Bear Avenue from a traffic standpoint. This was one of the primary reasons for moving the access to Radatz Avenue. There woul d still be traffic congestion, only it would be a block or two north on White Bear Avenue, Secretary Olson Said the original plan did show e drive to White Bear 1n addftfnn to Radatz Avenue. The drive to White Bear was shown as part of the concept plan for the Office building and was not planned to be put in with the housing project. With the median in White Bear" there would be only right in, right out movement. Staff feels the best solution from a traffic standpoint would be to use either White Bear or the first drive on Radatz and then going out to Southlawn. Staff feels that Southlawn will become the main access via Beam Avenue, Mike McKenna, Realty Development Services, rev some of the past ' hiStbry of this development proposal. They thought the best access for the site would be by using Radatz Avenue on th!-:1 eastern and western portions of the site, He discussed the Grant applications that have been mode to try and off set some of the improvement costs required for the project. CDmmisSiomer Kfshel asked Mr. 11cKenna how they propose the ~ pro'ect be Served by utilities and streets unless the conditions remain f the original approval. ` Mr. McKenna said it could be done, in a number of ways. He did not think 30 to 35 cars would accelerate the deterioration of Radatz Avenue that much. Their most favorable Option would be to proceed as planned, to do the storm water improvements as originally proposed, do the water looping as originally proposed, but not build the new street, . gutter and water service in Radatz Avenue. If that is not considered feasible they do have an agreement with the eastern portion of the property and could provide access to the development from White Bear Avenue and then take their chances on the ClondemnatiOn procedures for providing an access to Southlawn. for the recommendation would be acceptable to the applicants, Commissioner KiShel asked if the points given in the Staff report Mr. McKenna said yes, ' but also it would depend on the cost Of the improvements* outlined as to whether the development would remain economicall feasible for them. 2 3-17-80 -Commissioner Iii shel asked if the Council discussed condemn'in propert for a roadwa throu the propert to the west, Mr. McKenna said did come up at the meetin but not reall discussed, thorou Commissioner Pellish said he was not in -favor of the Cit attdmptin to condemn propert for private purposes for an access to a private development rather than as a public improvement. Mr. McKenna said the project is bein financed with public funds, he thou the access ;:would be public Commissioner Prew said the people that objected to the townhouses bein located at the site are now also objectin because of the additional .costs involved in assessments that the will receive. Chairman Axdahl asked if there �.,fas an si difference in cost between continuin Southl awn and g oin g throu the condemnation process and constructin the drivewa out to the east to White Bear Avenue. Commissioner Kishel said the Commission should forward a recommendation of approval if alternatives can be worked out as' to access to the site, water service and storm water draina He did not think the Commission had to work out al -I of the details Mr. McKenna said the recommendation the are lookin for from the Commission, if the Commiss.ion so wishes, is that this is what the Commission .ori recommended and the still feel that it is the best idea, however, the Commission COLIld be willin to support some alternate traffic patterns for the project. Mr. .McKenna said the would have to Come back later with the details of the de-Si and at that title the Commission could make a reconiiiendation Commissioner Fischer said if g eneral g uidelines would have been g iven b the Commission in their first recommendation, the applicant would not have to be back now, he could just . work with the staff and Council. Commissioner Kishel moved the Planninq Commission recommend to the Cit Counci ' 1 --' de - n al of the ap�Pf cants re - to el imi mate conditions I a. - i throu 1 Commissioner Pellish seconded A - 6 Na - I (Commissioner Fischer) Commi,ssioner Kishel - moved the Plannjn_ recommend to the City'Council the fo - I lowi [I �modi f i cations to the pr _prel i mi nar planned unit development: No buildin permits shall be issued, unless Council orders the followin public improvement projects: a. An- ade sized and desi water main to serve the project, as determined b the Director of Public Works. b. Up of Radatz Avenue from White Bear Avenue to proposed Southl awn Drive, if Radatz Avenue is used as an access. c. Construction of Southl awn Drive from Radatz Avenue to Beam Avenue. if it is deemed necessar . 3 3-17-80 7T. r d. Construction of the storm water project show' in the Maplewood Drainage Pl an for Radatz Avenue. All necessary easej�ents shall also be dedicated to the Ci ty. This project includes P g i i n , pondi ng, and control devices, � Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes al l . MEMORANDUM Ift TO: Cit Mana FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: 1980 Diseased Shade Tree Pro DATE: March 27, 1980 Attached are the specifications for securin the services of a tree removal cont.ractor for 1-980 and a status -report on the diseased shade tree mana pro in the Cit of Maplewood. In 1979, the Cit received State Aids totalin approximatel 40% of the pro cost. A Similar level of fundin is anticipated for t he 1980 season. Costs above that covered b State and Cit Aid are recovered throu special assessments to the benefittin propert The project is normall financed throu the sale of special assessment bonds. Bonds cannot be sC-)ld at this time. It is intended to open bids on. May 13, 1980, b which ti-one the Cit options for financin this pro should hav, � been clarified. It is intended to reduce the level of inspection staffin from prev y ears to our full-time forestr technician and one temporar tree inspector hired for the duration. of the inspection season. In A-Dril of 1978, the Cit Council approved the position of full-time forestr technician with the stipulation that the position would be reviewed each y erli- with the establishment of'the sanitation pro It is recommen-ded. the posit-_-Lc,,n be retained to carr out this y ear's prog ram. Approval of the final specifications and authorization to advertise for bids is recommended. J A.P-PROVING PLANS, ADVERTISING FOR BIDS WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed b the Cit Council on April 17, 1980, specifications for the Diseased Tree Pro Maplewood Project No. 80-6., have been prepared b or under the direction rection of the Cit En and he has presented such specifications . to the Council for approval NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA& 1. Such specifications, a cop of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereb approved and ordered placed on file in the of f ice of the Cit Clerk. 2. The Cit Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the of f is lial paper, an advertisement f o=_ bids upon the making of such ;4 f* improvement under such approved spe.,- i I cations. The advertisement shall be published at 1-east ten (10) da before date set f or bid opening, shall specif the work to be done, shall st th b ids will be publicly opened and considered b the Council at the time and date selected b the Cit En at the Cit Hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied b a certified check or bid bond, pa to the Cit of Maplewood, Minne(,--�ota, for 5% of the amount of such bid, 3. The Cit Clerk and Cit En are hereb authorized and instructed to receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. 1-1 be in substantiall the followin 4, The advertisement for bids sha f orm: ys hi ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS The Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota will receive sealed bids for the removal of diseased shade trees and necessar restoration., on public land and private properties within the Cit limits. Bids will be received until 2:00 P.M., C.D.S.T., on the 13th da of May, 1.980 at the Municipal Buildin 1380 Frost Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota, at which time and place all bids will be publicl opened. No bids will, be considered unless sealed and f iled with the Cit Clerk and accompanied b a cashier's. check or bid bond pa to the Clerk of the Cit of Maplewood in the amount of f ive per cent (5%) of the bid. Proposal forms, includin specifications, are filed in the office of the Cit Engineer, located at 1902 East Count Road "B", Maplewood, Minnesota, '5109. Copies of the documents ma be obtained. b depositin $5.000 Lucille E. Aurelius Cit Clerk Cit of Maplewood PUBLISH: Maplewood Review r �N April 7, 1 -980 T ;app.ewoad City Hall 13('30 ~o st Avenue 3•k�p e� -rooa, i•��_nresota Z- APR 19'.0 o r; CITY , o � �� JOGI1,lj�p JN A•tten i- . on : M_ty Cle rk ' I have discussed the pr ob-'%lem off. T aterpooling on - the pr oper '.: - of 2160 itioni t� with thy, Ci Y— En- ineerinG Department. They h� -ve conducted an inves uigation re Larding this -Problem au - id ,7, - v sed r��e to co��tr�;ct you so as to get on the a?enda for the s �heduled city council meeting � will awal' t your reply. Yours truly Robert C. - A bre cht 2450 I �; =mi ty, z I- J.plewood,., I�1i.nnesota 5�11 ��1 a 3rd 0 l . Cat P;4 Ot f. MEMORANDUM TO: Cit Mana FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: 2450 Nemitz Street DATE: April 9, 1980 Mr. Robert C. Albrecht has asked to be placed on the Council a It is m understanding that he will be asking the Cit to carr out a pro to drain pondin water off his lot at 2.450 Nemitz Street. The public works facilities in the Pleasantview Park No. 2 Subdivision, in which Mr. Albrecht ',s lot is located, were constructed in 1964. The subdivision was constructed with curb and g utter and a storm sewer s It appears that the lot g radin g .done as homes were bein built on this block did not provide appropriate back draina A ver preliminar review indicates that a back catch basin and storm sewer runnin to the s in Nemitz Street would be re to alleviate the problem. This pro would cost approximatel 8 to 10 thousand dollars. m -Y Y• i • t t ' ' t 5 1 ti ,' z. > k flu f. V i• .•? T r � v • : - AV --Z i N � N v ' 7 r Or C L � I'v Cz Jl# t jT — ` ' -..tea t ,-, + , t, t. • � 1. `• • .� •.� 1 �. r r .... • ' � �« ..e. �`` • - r w.ar �, • ... r. • - , __ ��► V • . ���r �. , Y F• ib • �, -, 4 A ir 4 � —Z 7! S p �hl� � �� Ct 1 �t 7 Ik �� "to �: CA , a on ._� it •cri 1 _� •. .. E F 260,000 p .,,��` • ,�.',iplf,4• • .NeA'. 4''..-.rr =�'Z. ? ♦'t �"s�'r,? „ p. -!= a+�m..., n: .; ••-•-•W'y .,.� r--- .,� y^.1� „ � ' E' _ _y .r,�t�, k; ..-'...'w-„'eo-�b.q s , " FI'�"� S, e. a 'r�`y� + y +>f+`6�.,.n,�td4�+v#4:'?�{v-'.$+flat/-?5+' q:iY+�:?rrnaw.• ' • �.,P . - n :r �...,,Nwa 'a .�r , ' ,;-. 1.. _ v`•..rt,.owK&ae..�•_.51r..w.+ta:.'t#.y�-""""_ t• ^p"„rr"•,. ,�'•/1�1,,. 3 �c 'K'E �-xiiv "'� q` w ���/r��.rt(/ -:',•h,r 'A` .. ,: a..i.,.,� >YC. li f.. (-, .�.,._(." . '�•r '/�, .)'e. e. �• -�. ,¢' -,+ :3.• ,tr r {/ •n :,r' k. n If .:,t (• �,. t la�4 - }: i„ L 't t ' �' - cSf `` q _ _ _ 1 0-� I{! _. .. k - ��: �;� ,.. .,..:a .i-+ - r -,.I •• .:�+""`","". i ,h. .;+tl�,'• .eR `^n. ,I F „`e ,tom,. f:;k r �: j. ..... L .. ,r: _.::. .. - _ •Ik_a""'°r ,c' t, f` ,.r.: 'x k j:.:.i. !' °ie ,'.'1` „/ n ,.....'.YF.7.. `i.,--:i`:rtx r�::., ,_'YeiO•£""1� -.�:c - ., ,:,e:,.,+•,nw•""^' ,,.cs.+.c _ t .`.T,c^ 1'' 'i i.:.. .. 'r,.-. •d /41 i '`;r., .wor ., .. .,. . t w _«+.wx•^ •-.- �..,.,.•,..+•s..y :.. -��"�•;• f'' •r.,.� .q•>•,`` ~I� ,. I,.,. _ �;,* is e: ., ... - f .•a° - A.. . t o • r+• Y /' r _ x., —„ ''s7 ♦x x`" e - � ! b. i jl' <I ,iiim,; L.B ,+: .//Fa' -,.a r „w•s w'� a._�d:, i. •s..''/ 're, .I t „-9,: e . .. _ „ e f �: --.- `' ts"r.•+.,t..y,;; rn ....."." j r4: 4;. .5,.✓^"°' >. ..,.'•>_•r..,, s / r„r,..=7>x.: J MEMORANDUM City Manager F f Communi to.; ty Development ROM: [)irector o J:inal Plat SUBOECT.:Maryland Avenue, West of FerndE,le Street LOCATIO14: Brandt Engineering company APPLICANT: Maple Greens Third Addition PROJECT: April 105o 19 80 DATE: Greens Third the Maple Gree The . applicant is requesting approval of a final plat for July 20 5 1978.5 Addition. The •CitY Council approved the preliminary plat on fol "owl conditions: subject to the f d stormwaterponds 1. Approval of the design and construction phasing of the propose F*fth and Sixth Add*tions by the and drainage system for the Thi Fourth') I �r before final plat approval; Ci•ty Enginee ncil orders the 2. The final plat shall not be approved, unless the City COu construction of Sterling -Street; t to Maryland Avenue5 Outlot C shall be 3, If the Council orders Sterling Street if Sterling Street is terminated shown as a ded- cated public right-of-way. at East Rose Avenue!, OutlOt C shall be omitted and the property combined with ..Lots 31 and 32 of Block 15 t-.1a-ple Greens Third Addition; include only the west 20 feet. The rem . ainder 4. Outlot B shall be redesigned to s 6 and .7; of the propey�Y sha-11 be incorporated into block 6,, 1 lot f lot 155 block I westerly from the he 5. The portion of Outlot D northwest corner o to Outlot C shall be incorporated into lots to tsouth . ; s shall be dedicated to the City; 60 All outlOt such a . s by-laws, and articles of incorpor- val of written documentation, final plat approval. Such document- ? , Approval the homeownerts. association before property and . uta I i ty mai ntenance,3 0 ateon,shall cic2arly. define responsibilities for pr ecorded so as to 6 ation ings and assessments. Such documentation shall be r .Utility bill effected property. Should the Association be dissolved5 it's *th each a run wi iate public agency to be used for assets shall be dedicated to an appropr ciation was created. if dedi cation_ purposes simil(ar to those for which this Assoc rof i t organi zati on is refused, the assets are to be transferred to some other non�p to be devoted to such similar purposes* Such ease - 8. Approval of easement.-ts for drive access and utilities to each lot "th the land. meats shall be recorded to run,wi -Washington Metro Watershed. Board's 9. Obtaining a permit from the Ramsey "an. 100 e allowed by the Comprehensive P1 Overall densities shall not exceed thos * appl4ct agree to the above i -n wrlting. 11. Owner and fan � OUnC1l approved the final plat On June 7, 1979. The applicant wouldnOw lie to phasethe previously approved plat in two parts. The plat 18 enclosed. All conditions for final plat approval have been met. ' . ecommenda ti on Approval of the final plat �--u T-N� Cozo��iI�/ ' �� MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FRo►II1: Director of Coiiii-Huni ty Development SUBJECT: Home Occupation LOCATION: 1997 Whi to Bear Avenue APPLICANT: Theresa Barnhill and Jeane Pearson OWNER: H. H. Barnhill PROJECT: Novel Exchange Store DATE: March 265 1980 Vi L 'w 4. '.• �`.a:.P.w!«wJb-A.v..Hn'/K4'GnV:+'1+.,.:u(�l^'Flv.1/tVtYK•4P.!4.1 Request Approval to operate a book exchange business out of the applicant's i cant ` s gara e . pp � g Site Description 1. Location: 1997 White Bear Avenue (see enclosed map) . 2. Lot area: 18,000 square feet. 3. Existing land use: Single family dwelling. Proposed Land .Use I. The applicant is proposing a paperback book exchange business which is basically a hobby. Neighbors walk in to exchange books. The business is restricted to one-half of the applicant's double garage. The amount of money that is exchanged is the difference between the customer's book and the book they want. 2. There are four off --street parking spaces in the applicant's yard. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Undeveloped land Southerly: Single family home Easterly: White Bear Avenue and Ramsey County property. Westerly: County Ditch #17 P 1 anni ng Considerations 1. Land Use Plan Designation: RL, Low Density Residential. 1 ' e k �'. Zoni ng: R-1 , Resi dence Distri ct (Si n le Dwel l i n 9 g) 3. Section 904.010 (4) of the zoning Code permits offices of professional persons when located i n the dwel 1 ing of that person, but only when authori zed by the City Council. 4. The proposed use has been in operation since August, 1979. There have not been any complaints about the use. 50 Section 818.170 schedule No. 2 of the Sign Code. permits only one fascia sign of not more than two square feet in area for home occupations. Presently there are two painted wall signs and one ground sign. 6. See the enclosed subcommittee report on home occupations. Publ i c Safety Consi derations I . One wall mounted five pound all purpose fire extinguisher should be instal 1 ed. 2. No smoking signs should be posted inside. 3. Any signage that might attract traffic to stop suddenly could be a hazard and should. not be used. 4. Whi to Gear Avenue i s pos ted for no parki ng, therefore, al 1 customer parking must be off --street. Citizen Comments The four surrounding land owners received a letter from Staff requesting their opinions on the proposed home occupation. Stanley Burda and John Swaim have no. ob j ecti ons and "hopes they can make a success of it". The two others di d not comtment. Analys i s Staff ` s only concern with the proposal is that, should th-e business grow, parking may become a problem and traffic hazards could. develop on White Bear Avenue, which i s a Major Arterial. Presently there is n0 traffic problem being created with the present number of customers using the Novel Exchange. Recommendation Approval of the proposed home occupation, based on the above analysis and subject to: 1. one wall mounted five pound all purpose fire extinguisher shall be installed. 2. \No smoking signs sh'al l be posted. 3. Signage shall consist of one wall mounted sign not exceeding two square feet in area according to the Sign Code All other signs are to be removed. 4. Council shall review this home occupation after one year to see if there have been any problems created by this business. Enclosed: 1. Location Map 2 a Property Line Map 3* Planning Commission subcommittee report on horse occupations 2 Uvll —kA -1 . . . . . . . . . . PADATZ (3.) CH rd I NORTH ST* G V Fv Tw I N, -rl! I r) Fz d SHERREN AVEJ, COPEA VE. AVE.V LARK A'VE F 90 L LAURIE RD. 25 [A =VE =7 .4VE BU k X E cr E DRIDGI AVE v) I ELMON! =Ta) - AVE. UJ > VE u [S X ILL M A AVE. V w —JI._. LARK QVC — z LAURIE�0r. AVE. — J cci----F— UJI, �: ULM; AVE to I W), -j 5 U P�M JE- R j AV E. u tea Plokefield cr L:U( => i _ -Lolre :s SOP PRI [SE AV GJ x ui v,—Pi—T-vvj r AVE., 0 4 0 0" N COIW-f r /-P 7.p CASTI F AV — --ttl C== clt <RREN A C0 P -E AVE. 5 C) uj �-_--� u 1 0 No 68 OHOLL Ile o R PLEY AVE. EY AVE - KIN AVE [PRICE7- =AVE cr ui tE Iq 1.— 0 cr. LARPE � , .. _ 'mea - •s...,. _ J� !• .., f �-,--•4was:yf,�. Y -� � �r., 1 �aY4Fh �0�� `J ,3 -- �••�.� fir,, �:.wW,;,R,•._ I .f .. � � . .. `kms,. ' �.�f r4�•--�-.,�...�-a.w •v+yy'�� - T r ....-w.....�1 1 '.....�.. ir;. _ y _ �-ate r.. ..•. �. -... tit - .»S wr Ie ...... a.,• ... w r o. �.. a..� .•.. w+... - L -"'-KG VL�� '°0"vayyi;�� _ �.•� � - r. `J- .� { r 1 �• t � r -y -- ..� � ^: rte` _. Ll "77. ol ki A Y i L . - r t .i L'y M f • .. '. }]� I ( - Via+, s� �r ►w � .� 1ti W • t � l .a.iuw r.. . , � r.., � f,,.•- �, , , r � +,,, '�\, „yam - ,ter.-cr�•-�.,,�,�.�,...,a.,`�. ` +.�- - . , ,,.,,. •• 1 �..��,..•�- '"� � a . , r :,• . � r � / I \ �• .w.....•a. ..-..ra.+r+.a:aYa••M;}ao�ri�'' Jf�i 41. k r *: T--7�T I a 10, CIO! Z/l Y ` .1 4+AwL f� /� ' �r�IrY ,` •w � a .!� �/fa .d - w��...�.w �. t J W �_, � � � ° .? -• '�� / - .,. 1. 2 r a .. E PFTITIONEK. Barnhi 11 rn.ewo •H!•lglv�R/ers.�N,r C' s3 3 F S T E x �ce �-ti o�n t R E a U 2.c �i(-' I Commission ...concurs with the deed for an approj-)ricate definition •1-101-11/1-J Occupa tion w It is also fel't that -whj le Cortaill occup . citibns> require • S U a III C C', 0 special use permit, other activities' such as t2iose that do ,e any of the follo%.iing should Tae allov;ed %%Yithout a permit. mp 1 oyme n t of ai -iy person not: residing i.n thc---)- dwelling unit !.. )))Cu,9,Comers viii ting the premises, c)Manufacture of products on the- premises, Planning Cormiiission proposes the follow.ing guidelines for a Home occupatioi-i., Home occupation requiring a permit is defined as that occupation conducted in a dwelling unit involving the manufacture and or sale of of a product or service sub5ect to tie following limitations., a) Js conducted on a continuing basis, that is, for more then 30 days out of the year ��}: Not. more .then one person other then members of the family residing on the premises shall be allowed to engage in such occupation c) The use of the pre-.-,iises'for- the hc...,iie occupation sh.11 be clearly incidental and subordinate to its use for reric--ntial purposes by its occupants, and no more than an area equivalent of 207 of the dwelling unit floor area phall be used -in the conduct of the home' OCCUpation; It d) There sli, e h all bno cange- in tai ou e is id appearance of the building or W pramises, o-.,- other visible evidence of the conduct of such ho,.r-:e occupation. one. sil9n not exceeding one square foot in area, rion-illuma-inatLed, other thall > I and mounted f lat against the ,.all of the pr-incipal bui]-ding. e) There shall be no retail sales of products produced off site in connection with such home occupation. )Iqo traffic shall be generated by Such 'home occ f uPation in greater volumes than would normally be expected in a residential neigliborhood, and the need for off-street parkinq shall ' It riot L_ exceed more than Lhree off-street Parking spaces for the home- Occupation at any given ti' -L- in addition to, the parking spaces required by the resident Occupanjts;'in no event shall such num her of off-stre et -pal -king spaces exc,-Ded a total of f ive such spaces for the Premises and shall be off of the street other Lhan in a required front yard; ( .) NO equipment Or process Shall be used J.n such ho,,, -:,,c oc I j noi-se, vibration, glare, funies Cupation which creates %_R 1. odors, or electrial interference drA.- ` 4" L # - der to the normfal senses o , hl the 'lotl if. the Occupation is conducted in a sii),!lc family residence, or outside the dwelling ullit if conducted in other tharj� A single family residence, In the case of electrical •interference no equip:-acilt or Pl-ocess be used which creates v- I )-sual or audible inter- ference in any radio or television receivers 'Off t1le premisesor causes fluctuations in line voltage off tl-.e pre,-nis , NO fire, sfetyl, or health ''hazzard shall exist for the rJidents of the dti.�olling unit, customers o*MP es loye -re MEMORANDUM TO : C1t« Manager FROM: Finance Director RE : Paramedic Bill --Application for CcaDoel7dt1on DATE: April 10,.1980 An application for cancellation of paramedic ambulance service charges has been received for Lillian Anlauf. This individual wastaken to St, Paul - Ramsey Hospital On 'February 28, 1980 and was suffering from a respiratory infection. The first billing of $4O for paramedic services was dated March lSt, Sub -sequently" the attached letter dated March 26th was received which requested that the City acceDt her medicare benefits /$32\ as full payment. On Ap01 9th the attached application for cancellation of charge's was received for the CoUntil/s review and action. a '; c .,'+Ya k. &bhl A � v ` a °C Cl int aul,Tiro asota 5 1,01, c7cicp itc 221-J;5( zzc— �7>7 K<< • AP11L1(1"dA'fION FOR CANCEIA2TION of PARAMEDIC .AMBULANCE SERVICE CHARGES t NMIE of APPLICANT: ,��� � ADDRESS OF APPLICANT.- : ':�� � p� � ` ry 7�", w � w i S.r. v'� t K / C ITY Gla STATE ZIP 8 � PATIENT'S NAME (a_ /@ U DATE of SERVICE: �Y_V r i3� vtifL�t�G� o t= REASON FOR REQUEST: i'\.. Financial Hardship (fill out reverse side 2. other: I certify that the income information I have supplied on this application is - true s_true and accurate. Date: t e: S g n e d: _.., •f -�-r �-�- s. -" - -� nicans any M110Lrrlt reccivVc:.l from the follOW'111r1 soclrces by airy Resident: Any Public AssiSt�:11 ce, in0kiding but not Salol _i0%,, illcicldinq C01-Y1I11iSSi011S, b0r1USeS1 limited to Welf�irc, AFDC;, SSI, and overtinle pay and tips Unemployment Coivipc nsat1011 interest and Dividends Pensions an(3 AnrWitiCS, including PERA 0 Rental income and Social SOCUrity 0 BLISinesSTrofit for self-employed Estate or Trust income indiviCiuK-11S. including Farmers 0 Gains from the sale of property or G Payr-nents received fron-1 properties being Securities sold on Contracts for Deed 0 VA Educational Grants List all residents -of- your household. Include yourself, include their ages and their incomes (if any): 1) Income listed should include all income which your household can reasonably expect to receive; cJt1j•r17 Mi? next 12 177ontl7s. 2) "RESIDENT" mcans cany person, other than a renter,living in the household for aL Icast 9 months of Ine, year,, w- a pt''-ison who is ciairned as a dependent Tor incorne tax pt!rposes. NAME OF AGE OF INCOME OF RESIDENT RESIDiNT. RESIDENT SOURCE OF INCOME (per month) (ir cluding employer's address, if applicable) c M TOTAL I N CO M'- : / ..._.. per monthY er � year P April 1-0, 1-980 STAFF Rlq-,'PORT To: City Manager Barry Evans. From: Director of Public Safety R. W. Schaller Subject: Request for "No Parking Anytime" Zoning and Signing Both Sides of English Street, Frost Avenue to the Soo Line Railroad Tracks During recent review of parking in the area of the Maplewood Bowl and *the Moose Lodge, a discussion was held in relation. 'to the desirability of "No Parking Anytime" restrictions on both sides of English Street from Frost Avenue to the Soo Line Railroad tracks. The Staff has reviewed this matter and feels for pedestrian safety and vehicle turning and maneuvering safety this area. should be zoned and marked "No Parking Anytime." This proposal has been reviewed with the Bowl manager.rient, the Moose Lodge management and the two residents. in this area. They all concur that in the interest of safety it would be a desirable posting. Staff recommends that the City Council declare this a "No Parking Anytime" zone and direct. the appropriate signing be erected. RIMS : j s cc Director of Public Works Deput-y Chief Hagen City Clerk 80-003882 o . ' ,� / / `�� MEMORANDUM ' ' TO : City Council FROM : Barry R. EvenS, City Manager,,,,,.,-.. SUBJECT: Drivers License RenewalsDATE April 14, 1980 (/ \ AS I have indicated to you I have t8l,ked to Joe.GoChkOwSki concerning Maplewood handling drivers license renewals. He has not madea decision On how he will handle the replacement of the facility at Shoppers City, If we are interestedhowever, we Should notify him shortly as he will be making a decision within 30 days, The primary reason for our providing the service would be as 8 convenience to the publ1c. Many of those who have been purChasfng lfCeMS8 plates have expressed the desire to be able to renew -their drivers licenses here too. Based on a check with Other cities that are providing the Service and my talk to Mr. GOchkowski it is apparent that the service would pay for it- self even though it would be necessary to hire an additional part-time person, I would like your decision as to how theCity should proceed in this matter. ��tae_____.______