Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982 10-07 City Council Packets AGENDA Maplewood City 'Counci 1 6:00 P.M., Thursday, October 7, 1982 Municipal Administration Building Meeting 82 -26 A) CALL TO ORDER B) ROLL CALL C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes 82 -25, September 13, 1942 D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA E) CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and w i l l be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion on these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be con separately. 11 Accounts Payable EA) SPECIAL HEARINGS 1. 1983 Budget (6:00 P.M.) 2. Plan Amendment - Health Resources (6:30 P.M.) F) PUBLIC HEARINGS 11 Commercial Development Revenue Note - Emerald Inn (7:00) 2. Rezoning - 2669 & 2677 E. 7th St. (7:15) 3. Code Amendment - B C M (7:30) G) AWARD OF BIDS H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Planning Fees 2, City Council /Planning Committee Meeting I) NEW BUSINESS 1NNUnocad (w) ot 6 L 9 Z SNOIiVit'3S3bd lIONnoo (1) NOUVA3S3bd bOlISIA (P) 1 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, September 13, 1982 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 82 -25 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the CouncilChambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by - Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present MaryLee Maida, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes No. 82 -22 (August 19, 1982) Councilmember Juker , moved that the Minutes o Meetin No. 82 -22 (August 19 1982gg )be approved as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes all. 2. Minutes No. 82 -23 (August 23, 1982) Councilmember Anderson moved that the Minutes of Meetin No. 82 -23 (Au ust 23 1982beapprovedassubmitted. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes — all. 3. Minutes No. 82 -24 (August 25, 1982) Councilmember Juker moved to approve the Minutes of Meetin No. 82 -24 (A ust 251982) as submitte ---- Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes — Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian Juker and Maida. Mayor Greavu abstained. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to _approve the agenda as amended: 1. Amend Comprehensive Plan, 2. McKnight Road 3. Assessment Policy Review 4. Reconsideration for Clarification 5. 25th Anniversary Run b. Rezoning on Frost 7. Engineering Technician Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes — all. 1 — 0/ q E . UONKE - NT AGENDA Council removed Consent Agenda Item 8 and placed it as Item E - A3, Councilmember Anderson moved, seconded by Councilmember Juker, Ayes - allY , to approvetheConsentAgendaItems1through7, 9 through 11 and 13 through 16 as recommended: 1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses, Check No. 00810 throughCheckNo. 000895 g281972.79: Check No. 014103 through Check No. 014256 - $332,403.54:Part II, Payroll - Check No-, 04794 through Check No. 04922 - $58,175.55) in the amountof $672,551.88. 2. Budget Transfer - Severance Pay Authorized a $25,000 transfer from account 101- 402 -4010 to finance the estimated sever- ance payments for the balance of 1982. 3. Termination of 3M Agreement for Fire Protection Authorized termination of the agreement with the 3M Company for fire P rote ction. 4. Renewal - Employee Disability and Dental Coverage Authorized renewal of the existing one year contracts for long term disability insurancewithConnecticutGeneralandselfinsurancedentalplanwithEmployeeBenefitPlan. 5. Public Hearing - 1983 Budget Resolution No. 82 -9 -119 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Maplewood City Council will hold a public hearingtoconsiderproposedusesoffederalrevenuesharing y City of MaplewoodduringrelationshipofsuchfundstotheCity's entire 1983 Budget.The hearing will begin at 6:00 p.m. on October 7, 1982, and will be held in the CouncilChambersat1380Frost•Avenue. All citizens will have the opportunity to P rovidewrittenandoralcommentsonthepossibleusesofrevenuesharingfundsandtoask questions concerning the entire budget and the relationship of revenue sharin g funds to the entire budget. The following is a summary of the proposed budget: The revenue sharing funds are proposed to be transferred to the General Fund and used 9/13 Proposed Proposed Revenue 83 Budget Sharing Portion General Government 6 0- Finance 174 0- City Clerk 320,290 0_ Public Safety 2 307 000 Public Works 3 0- Community Services 801 O- Community Development 239,8 0- Totals 13 307,000 The revenue sharing funds are proposed to be transferred to the General Fund and used 9/13 to partly finance the contracts between the City and its three fire departments: Gladstone, Parkside and East County Line. A detailed breakdown of the above will be available' for public inspection during normal business hours at the City Hall 1380 Frost Avenue. ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST in this matter are invited to attend and be heard. Senior Citizens are encouraged to attend and comment. Handicapped persons needingassistanceoraidsshouldcontacttheCityClerkbeforethemeeting. 6. Budget Transfer — Highview North Judgement Authorized the following budget transfers to finance the Highview North judgement: 42,760 101 -199 -4910 General Fund Contingency 1 203- 199 -4910 Revenue Sharing Fund Contingency 755 203 -111 -4360 Revenue Sharing Fund Newsletter Publishing 45,510 7. Approval of Elect -ion Judges Resolution No. 82 -9 -120 RESOLVED, that the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, accepts the followinglistofElectionJudgesforthe1982PrimaryElection, Tuesday, September 14, 1982: Precinct No. 1 Eleanor Mathews, Chairman Lorraine Schneider Maryls Hartman Mike Wasiluk Precinct No. 2 Pat Thompson, Chairman Evelyn Axdahl Kathleen Dittel Bea Hendricks Precinct No. 3 Barb Leiter, Chairman Charlotte Wasiluk Lynette Leonard Betty Emerson Precinct No. 4 Caroline Warner, Chairman Joyce Lipinski Marjory Tooley Elsie Wiegert Precinct No, 5 Jeanne Hafner, Chairman Emma Klebe Precinct No. 7 Betty Haas, Chairman Myrtle Malm Wyman Hageman Judy Widholm Precinct No. 8 Jean Myers, Chairman Lorraine Fischer Rita Frederickson Edity Stottlemeyer Precinct No. 9 Ida Szczepanski, Chairman Mary Johnson Dolores Mallet Betty Berglund Precinct No. 10 Anne Fosburgh, Chairman Mary Lou Lieder Dorothy Arbore Pat Werden Precinct No. 11 Dolores Lofgren, Chairman Maxine Olson 3 — 9/13 Sibbie Sandquist Phyllis Erickson Precinct No. 6 Kathy Supan, Chairman Linda Prigge Joanne Houghton Joyce Schmidt Shirley Luttrell Margaret McDonald Precinct No. 12 Mary Libhardt, chairman Deloris Fastner Mildred Dehn Audrey Duellman 8. Time Extension - Stillwater Road and Stillwater Avenue (Gaughan) See EA -3 9. Time Extension - Crestview Third Addition Approved a one year time extension for the Crestvie Third Addition preliminaryy 10. Time Extension - Goff's Mapleview Addition Approved a one year time extension for the Goff Is Mapleview Addition preliminaryYplatexceptthethreelotsfrontingonCountyRoadCwhichhavereceivedfinal plat approval, 11. Final Payment - 1982 Overlay and 1982 Seal Coating a. Resolution No. 82 -9 -121 WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City on August 16,1982, Allied Blacktop Company, Inc. has satisfactorily completed Project 82 -10 in accordance with such contract; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTAthattheworkcompletedundersuchcontractisherebyacceptedanda roved•P Pp and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk and Mayor are hereby diyytoissueaproperorderforthefinalpaymentonsuchcontract, taking the con- tractor's receipt in full. b. Resolution No. 82 -9 -122 WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City on July 7, 1982NorthwestAsphalt, Inc. has satisfactorily completed Project 82 -11 in accordancewithsuchcontract; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTAthattheworkcompletedundersuchcontractisherebyacceptedandapproved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk and Mayor are hereby directed t-o issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract, taking the contractor'sreceiptinfull. , 12. Commercial Revenue Note - Emerald Inn - Final Approval Remove from Agenda. 4 - 9/13 13. Change Order - Brookview Drive Resolution No. 82 -9 -123 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, has heretofore ordered Improve- ment Project No. 78 -20 and has let a construction contract therefore pursuant to Minn- esota Statutes, Chapter 429; and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and desig-nated as Improvement Project 78 -20, Contract Amendment #1; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existinggcontractbyexecutingsaidContractAgreement #1. 14. Final Payment - Brookview Drive Resolution No. 82 -9 -124 WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract approved by the City on June 18, 1981,DeLuxe Construction, Incorporated, has satisfactorily completed Maplewood ImprovementProjectNo. 78 -20 in accordance with said contract; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, the work completedundersaidcontractisherebyacceptedandapproved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that' the City Clerk and Mayor are hereby directed to issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract, taking the contractor's receiptinfull. 15. Donation - Trinity Baptist Accepted a donation of $225 from Trinity Baptist Church, 2220 Edgerton Street, with appreciation. 16. Change Order - Adolphus Street Resolution No. 82 -9 -125 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, has heretofore ordered ImprovementProjectNo. 81 -4 and has let a construction contract therefore pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429; and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and de- signated as Improvement Project 81 -4, Contract Amendment #1; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existingcontractbyexecutingsaidContractAmendment #l. E A SPECIAL HEARINGS 1. Plan Amendment - Health Resources a, Mayor Greavu stated this hearing was continued from the meeting of August23, 1982. Health Resources, Inc. is requesting approval of a plan amendment from SC Service Commercial to RB - Residential Business to construct a 100 plus con-Pdominiumorcooperativeresidencefor'senior citizens. 5 — 9/13 b. Mayor Greavu opened the meeting for anyone who wished to express their opinions.p ns.The following persons expressed their views: Mrs. Christine Stone, 2727 Hazelwood Street (against the proposal) Mr. Jim Swanson, Health Resources, Inc. spoke in favor Mrs. Phyllis Erickson, 2673 Hazelwood Street (against the proposal) Mr. Don Wiegert, 2119 Duluth Place (in favor) Mr. Ronald Erickson, 2673 Hazelwood Street (against the proposal) Mr. Gerald Glazer, Ebenezar Society, one of the committee who reviewed this site for senior citizen housing, spoke in favor Mr. Grant Haffely, 1559 E. County Road C (against the proposal) Mr. John Riley, Health Resources, Inc., spoke in favor. c. Mayor Greavu moved t approv the Plan Amendment from SC, Service Commercial, to RB, Re Business, as requested by Health Resources, Inc. to construct seni citiz housing on Hazelwood Street north of their faciliti at 2696 Hazel - wood. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmember Maida. Nays - Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Juker. 2. HRA Housing Proposal a. Manager Evans presented the staff report with the following recommendation: I. Approve the enclosed resolution, authorizing the conditional ""'preparation of applications to obtain tax- exempt mortgage financing and tax - increment financingauthorities. II. Authorize staff to execute letters of understanding with: A. WoodMark, Inc. for the recommended seniors development on site three; B. Helth Resources, Inc. for the recommended senior's development on site four; C. Holmes and Graven, Chartered to serve as bond counsel; D. Juran and Moody, Inc. to serve as financial E. Bond underwriter (a recommendation to be offered on September 13). III. Approve the enclosed resolution setting a public hearing for October 25 to adopt the City's Housing Plan under Chapter 462 c (Tax- exempt mortgage bonding)of State Statutes. b. Mr. David Briggs, WoodMark, Inc., 1707 Cope Avenue, spoke on behalf of the proposals. c. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 82 -9 -126 WHEREAS, the Maplewood Housing Plan, adopted June 28, 1982, calls for the creation of 620 housing opportunities for low to moderate income persons between 6 - 9/13 M 1980 and 1990- -195 of these units for the elderly and the remainder for families; WHEREAS, on May 11, 1982, the Maplewood Housing and Redevelopment Authority recommended to the City Council that the feasibility of a seniors' condominium residence /first -time home buyer housing program should be evaluated; WHEREAS, a listing of developers with expertise in seniors housing iwas re- quested from the Metropolitan Council; WHEREAS, four of the twelve developers contacted by Staff indicated that theyhadsitecontrolinMaplewood; WHEREAS, seven sites were submitted for consideration by the four interested developers (Bor -son, Health Resources, Inc. /Ebenezer Society, P.J. Gaughan, and Woodmark, Inc.); WHEREAS, on August 9, 1982, Council: 1. Requested site plans for the three best senior resident sites, as recom- mended by the HRA on July 28, 1982, and 2. Authorized City participation of up to $4,000 for the preparation of the first -time home buyer application, subject to repayment by the developer of the seniors' residence, if the application is approved; WHEREAS, on September 2, 1982, the HRA and City Council jointly interviewed the developers of the proposed sites for the seniors' residences; WHEREAS, Gary Solomonson Associates' feasibility study concluded that there is a market demand for both the proposed seniors' residence and first -time home buyer's program; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood,that the following actions are hereby authorized: 1. Preparation of an application to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for authority to issue tax- exempt housing revenue bonds, at a cost to the City, not to exceed $4,000, subject to repayment by the chosen devel- opers(s) of the seniors' residence, if this application is approved. 2. Preparation of a tax - increment financing plan to construct a seniors' condominium /cooperatives subject to *site plan approval being granted bytheCity. All costs to be paid by the chosen developer(s). Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. d. Councilmember Bastian moved to direct staff to review other sites for the senior residents roposal and authorized staff to execute letters of understanding with: A. WoodMark, Inc. to review senior resident development sites. B. Holmes and Graven, chartered to serve as bond counsel. C. Juran and Moody, Inc. to serve as financial advisor D. Miller and Schroeder Municipals as bond underwriter. 7 - 9/13 Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. e. Councilmember Bastian introduced the folloiwng resolution and moved its adoption 82 -9- 127 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood (the "City ") is interested in developing a first -time homebuyer /senior citizen housing program; and WHEREAS, the City is interested in selling housing revenue bonds pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, chapter 462C (the "Act ") in order to provide loans to the purchasers of housing units sold by senior citizens in the City; and WHEREAS, the Act requires the adoption of a Housing Plan (the "Plan "). after the holding of a public hearing, after published notice at least 30 days prior to the date of the public hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD: 1. That a public hearing on the proposed Plan is set for October 25, 1982 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. 2. That the City Clerk is directed to publish the following notice of public hearing once at least 30 days prior to the public hearing in a newspaper circulating generally in the City: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING GENERAL HOUSING PLAN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council will meet in the City Hall at 7:00 p.m., October 25, 1982, and conduct a public hearing pursuant to the requirementsofMinnesotaStatutes, Section 4.62C.01, et seq., as it relates to adoption of a General Housing Plan. This plan will describe the housing needs of the City and will describe a plan to meet said needs and other matters required by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C. Persons desiring to be heard on the proposed plan may address the Council. Further information regarding the plan will be available at the office of the City Manager after October 11, 1982. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 3. Time Extension - Stillwater Avenue and Stillwater Road. - Gaughan a. Councilmember Bastian moved approval of a one year time extension for P.J. Gau han's planned unit development at Stillwater Road and Stillwater Avenue, on the basis that market conditions have not permitted this project to move forward during the past year and there have been no changed conditions which would justif a denial, Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. House Moving: 2799 Southlawn Drive - 7:00 P.M. 8 — 9/13 y a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the requestofHermanJohnsontomoveahouseontopropertyat2799SouthlawnDrive. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in order and noted the dates of publication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. C. Mr. Herman Johnson, the applicant, spoke on behal - f of his proposal. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Bastian moved to approve the request of Herman Johnson to move a house onto roperty at 2799 Southlawn Drive subject to he followgconditions bei met before a moving permit is issued: ' 1. Payment of delinquent taxes and assessemnts 2. Payment of a $100 application fee 3. Provide a cash escrow, an irrevocable letter of credit, or equivalent securityof $1,000.00 to guarantee any street repair that may be required resultingfromdamagescausedbymovingthebuilding. 4. Lot lines shall be verified by the applicant by survey pins. 5. Furnish an irrevocable letter of credit, cash escrow, or equivalent security1 -1/2 times the estimated cost of remodeling, refinishing, or otherwise construct- ing or reconstructing such building in accordance with the plans and specificat-ions. With this surety, it shall be further conditioned that the work willbecompletedwithinninetydaysoftheissuanceoftheprmit. b. All rubbish, materials, extra fill, dirt, debris or left over material shall be removed from the property within seven days after building is removedfromasiteinMaplewood. 7. Any excavation or basement left after a house is moved from or within a lot in Maplewood shall be filled in within 48 hours, unless a ermit is approvedP to move another house onto said excavation. Any uncovered basement or excavationshallbefenced. 2. Sign Variance: Denny's Restaurant' 7:15 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a' public hearing regarding the requestofDenny's Inc. for a sign height variance to erect an eighty foot tall PY lonsign (a variance of 52 feet) and a sign area variance for a 350 nsquarefootsigngvarianceis150squarefeet). The Clerk stated.the hearing otice was in orderreandnotedthedatesofpublication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. C . Board Member Dean Hedlund presented the following Community Design ReviewBoardrecommendation. 9 - 9/13 Board Member Hedlund moved the Board recommend approval of the sign variance as presented to the Board with a maximum height of 50 feet, each sign not to exceed 175 feet--one s ign for Cricket Inn and one sign for Denny's. No additional free standing signs would be permitted on either site. The variance is recommended on the basis that the sign would not be readible at 25 feet by the interstate traffic and also, by combining the two signs on one 50 foot pole, it will minimize the clutter that multiple signs may create on the visual environment. The ordinance presently would permit each sign to be 200 square feet if on different poles. No, additional signs shall be installed on the approved 50 foot pole. Board Member Deans seconded. Ayes - all." d. Mr. Jack Lawrence, Signcrafters, explained the specifics of the p r oposaI e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Councilmember Anderson moved approv of this sign plan stamp d 8 -10 -82 for a si h i t and sign area variance for Denny's Restaurant and the Cricket Inn,i 1 1. Strict enforcement to height limitations would cause undue hardship since the sign would not be readable by the interstate.traffic. 2. By combining the signs on one fifty -foot tall pole, Denny's and the Cricket Inn would have minimized the clutter that multiple signs create on the environ- ment. The ordinance presently would allow one 200 square foot sign for each business if on separate poles. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The maximum height of the sign shall be fifty feet. 2. Each of the two sign faces shall not exceed 175 square feet. 3. No additional free - standing signs shall be allowed on either site. ,. 4. No additional signs shall be allowed on this sign pole. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 3. Code Amendment: Setbacks to Residential Zones - 7:30 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing concerning establishingminimumsetbacksforalltypesofbuildinginR -1 and R -2 zones that are based on height of buildings. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in order and noted the dates of publication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Commissioner Duane Prew presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: Commissioner Barrett moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council 10 - 9/13 approval of the ordinance amendment to establish minimum setback requirementheightandmss sbaseduponbuildingheigs, for multiple dwelling, commercial and industrialstructuresthatwouldabutF, Farm Residenceing) and R -2, Residence D' R Residence Districtt (sin le Dwell -District (Double Dwelling) g August 1 g) as outlined in staff's rg1, 1982, reportdatedAu Commissioner Whitcomb seconded. Voting: Ayes-Cog Barrett, Howard, KishelPrew, Sletten, Whitcomb Nays- Commissioners Fischer and . He'nJ Y Commissioner Whitcomb moved the Planning ornmi 'approval of the screenin ordi g ssion recommend to the City Council 11, 1982, g Hance as outlined in staff's report dated Augustg Commissioner Kishel seconded. Ayes- Commission ers Barrett, Fischer, He jny, Howard,Kishel, Prew, Sletten, Whitcomb.' d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard, r e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing,g g. Councilmember Bastian moved to table this Seconded by Mayor Greavu. A item -_.- m until October 7, 1982 meetin . Ayes - alY 4. Code Amendment: Environmental Prot •Protection Ordinance 7 :45 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting or a ubl'merit for an environmental r g P is hearing concerning a code amend-p otection ordinance. The Clerk stated the hearinwasinorderandnotedthedatesofpublication. g notice b. Manager Evans presented the staff report c. Commissioner Duane Prew presented the following •ing Planning Commission recommendation: Commissioner Fischer moved that while the Commission approves the conce t taresomequestionswiththedocumentaspresentedand P , here does not feel ready toitatthistime. endorse Commissioner Whitcomb seconded. Ayes-Commissioners Fischer, Whitcomb, SlettenHoward, Nays- Commissioners Barrett and Prew Abstained- Commissioners Kishel & He'n ,11JY d. Several area residents and developersproposal.voiced theer opinions regarding the e. Councilmember Anderson moved to refer theordinancetothePlanninCommis oposed environmenta prCommissionandtheHousingRedevelopmentAuth 'for further study and that the deve oritlrersbecontactedfortheirinput, Seconded by Councilmember Juker.Ayes - all. G. AWARD OF BIDS 11 - 9/13 I. Ho Avenue a. Manager Evans presented the staff report, b. Mayor Greavu introduce d the fol resolution and moved its ado ti on: 82 - 9 - 128 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLE WOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid ofT.A. Schifsky and Sons, Incorporated in the amount of $845,032.78, is the lowestresponsiblebidfortheconstructionofstreetwat Avenue ' ermain, sanitary sewer and drain -age improvements on Holloway Project No. 81 -12, and the Mayor and Cleareherebyauthorizedanddirectedtoenteri rkintoacontractwithsaidbidderforandonbehalfoftheCity. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson.Ayes - all, H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Employee Medical Insurance a. Manager Evans presented the staff report, b. Mayor Greavu moved to authorize a one- dy ar contract with Blue Cross /Blue ShieldformedicalinsurancebasedupontheirrPpoposalreceivedonSeptember3, 19820 Seconded by Councilmember Anderson,n. Ayes - all. 2. BC(M) Moratorium a• Manager Evans presented the staff report, b. Councilmember Anderson moved to extend the moratoriusepermitsforrecreationorrestaurantusesin um on the issu of s ecial the B --- -zoning district from Se tember 17 usiness Commercial- Modifi dr1982toNovember8198241 -- Seconded by Councilmember Juker.Ayes - all. 3. Billboard Moratorium a. Manager Evans presented the staff Pre ort. b. Councilmember Juker moved to extend moratoriumatorium for three months or untilanordinanceisadopted. " _._, Seconded by Councilmember Anderson.Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian Juker and Maida. Nays - Mayor Greavu. 4. "No Parking" Larpenteur Avenue a. Manager Evans presented the staff report, b. No action taken. The applicants were 'not in attendance at the meeting. c. Council directed the Police Department to check this area for parking problems. 12 - 9/13 I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Increase in Permit Fees a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to table _the permit fe until the next regular meeting and that Council discuss these a the work shop session. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 2. Jon Belisle - Sewer Fees a. No action taken. Applicant was not in attendance at the meeting. 3. Bellaire Sanitation - Automated Refuse Removal a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. ' b. Councilmember Bastian moved to direct staff to prepare an ordiance r e.ulatin Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 4. Eleventh Avenue Right of Way Tax Delinquency a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved it adoption: 82 - 9 - 129 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, as follows: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood wishes to continue using certain property herein - after described for street purposes, to wit, 11th Street; and WHEREAS, said premises are listed as tax forfeited lands known as Parcel No. 57 01110 010 39; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: that the City of Maplewood hereby requests that the County Land Commissioner and /or other appropriate officials obtain for the City of Maplewood a Minnesota Use Deed for City Street purposesfor11thAvenuethepropertydescribedasfollows, to wit: The South 165 feet of the Northwest uarter of the Southeast RQQuarterof the Northwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 29, Range 22, except the West 60 feet thereof which is held by Ramsey County for White Bear Avenue right - of -way. The appropriate city officals are hereby authorized and directed to forward a copy of this Resolution to the Land Commissioner of the County of Ramsey and proceedtoobtainsaiddeed. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 11 13 J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. Andy Zuercher a. Mr. Zuercher stated he formalized plans to build a pole. building in April, 1982. He received approval from the Planning Commission at that time. He applied for a building permit some time later and was told the Council had passed an ordinance prohibiting,pole buildings. b.- Council stated he could apply for a variance. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Amend Comprehensive Plan a. Councilmember Juker stated she wished to amend the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the Gladstone area. She outlined the area that should be changed. b. Councilmember Juker moved to initiate an amendment to the Land Use Plan for the Gladstone area. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes — Councilmembe Anderson, Juker and Bastian. Nays — Mayor Greavu, Councilmember Maida. 2. McKnight Road a. Councilmember Anderson requested a feasibility study be made for McKnight Road. b. Staff stated a feasibility study has already been completed. and previously presented to Council. 3. Assessment Policy a. Councilmember Anderson requested the City assessment policy be reviewed. 4. Reconsideration for Clarification a. Councilmember Anderson stated he would like to reconsider a motion made at the last meeting on the Frost Avenue rezoning for clarification purposes only. b. Manager stated if requested it would be placed on the next agenda. 5. 25th Anniversary Run a. Councilmember Bastian stated the 25th Anniversary Run will be held October 17, 1982. It will start at noon at Plaza 3000 and will be 5 miles. There will be applications available at City Hall. L. ADMINISTRATIV PRESENT 1. Engineering Technician a. Manager Evans stated one of the Engineering Technicians resigned and requested authorization to replace him. b. Mayor Greavu moved to authorize the Manager to Droceed to fill the Pnoi noor-i no 14 9/13 technician position. Seconded by Councilmember Maida, M. ADJOURNMENT 11:40 P.M. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Bastian, Juker and Maida. Nays - Councilmember Anderson City Clerk 15 —9/13 1U -CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK* A M 0 U N T do 1 000941 000942 000943 000944 000945 000946 84, 062.42 i 3. 20 3 s 46 298. 00 66. 00 3,786.75 A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 10 -07 -82 PAGE C L A I M A N'T U R P 0 S E MUELLER PI PELINERS I AWARDED CONST CONTRA JUDY CHL.EBECK TRAVEL +' TRAINING MINN STATE TREASURER _. NV _. LICENSE FEES PAYP MINN STATE. TREASURER STATE D/L FEES PAYAS RAMSEY CTY CONCILIATION A/R - PARAMEOIC METRO WASTE CONTROL COMM SoA.C, PAYABLE 000947 5,829.49 DELUXE CONSTRUCT 000948 2 7. 30 MINN STATE TREASURER 000949 237* 00 MINN STATE TREASURER 000950 83050 RAMSEY CO CLERK OF GIST 000951 3, 031.65 MINN STATE TREASURER 000952 1100 00 MINN STATE TREASURER 000953 1, 393.51 MINN STATE TREAS- SURTAX 000954 100. 00 LOIS DEH14 090955 88, 858. 0:1 OFFE I SONS INC 000956 1, 872. 60 MINN STATE TREASURER 000957 291,. 00 MINN STATE TREASURER 008958 30.00 GOVT TRAINING SERVICE 000959 180. 0D L.AVERNE NUTESON 0+00960 1007.25 .MINN STATE TREASURER 0 00 961 187* 00 MINN STATE TREASURER 090962 8. 00 SPRINGER COLLECTIONS 000963 3, 208,* 25 MINN STATE TREASURER 000964 286.00 1NN STATE TREASURER CO NT P SL - PET PCT AND - AWARDED C04ST Cr NV LICENSE FEESS PAY I STATE D/L FEES PAYAE C TY D/L FEES PAYA E MV LICENSE FEES PAYA STATE D/L FEES PAYA. SURCHARGE TAX PA YA SL Change - League of T Re ionaZ DE leet ' YO%TRAAlfi1CONS MV LTCENSE FEES PAYA STATE D/L FEES PAYA R TRAVEL f TRAINING TRAVEL + TRAINING MV LICENSE FEES PAYA STATE D/L FEES PAYA 0 FEES, SERVICE Paramedic Collectior Mai LICENSE FEES PAYA STATE 0/3: FEE'S PAYA 8 CITY OF MAP L E WOOD A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 10-w07--82 FADE i CHECK*A M 0 U N T C L A I N A N T P U R P 0 000965 1,898* 4b MN STATE TREASU RER --PERA CONTRIBUTIONS, P£RA 000966.39962.28 NN STATE TREASURER -PERA P. E *R.A. BED PAYABLE AND - CONTRIBUTIONS, P 0 00 9b 7 8, 690. Sir MN STATE TREA SURER`p ERA P.E. R.A. D PAYABLEAYABLE AND - CONTRIBUTIONS, P 000968 as 00 METRO AREA MGT - ASSOC TRAVELEL TRAINING 0 00 96 9 267.07 STATE OF MN __ -- _ ._. ___ -..._ _DUE FROM OTHER GOVT AND - INVENTORY OF SUP 000970 204* Off MINN STATE TREASURER STATE D/L PEES PAYAS 000971 2r 773. 75 MINN STATE TREASURER MV LICENSE FEES PAYA 000972 1 v 000. 04 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT CLAIMS DEPOSITS WITHI PAYING 000973 75. 00 RA MSEY CO CLERK OF DIST TCN Y D/L FEES PAYA 3 000974 12000 HEALTH ED UCA T I ON SERVICE DO 0 KS 000975 2, 039.50 MINN STATE TREASURER MV LICENSE FEES PAYA 00097 158. 00 NINN STATE TREASURER STATE D/L FEES PAYA 8 000977 12 031. 04 ORFE I + SONS INC Construction Develop, 0 0 0 97 8 3, 672. 72 SLUE CROSS f BLUE SM I E LO Sent to City in error PREPAID EXPENSE 000979 219000 MINN STATE TREASURER STATE D/L FEES PAYA 9,9 0009.80 1,670. 54 MlAPLELEAF OFFICIALS ASSN FEES i SERVICE Fall S of tbal l L 000981 5.95 METRO AREA MGT ASSOC TRAVEL fL TRAINING 000982 2 , 606. 15 MINN STATE TREASURER MV LICENSE FEES PAYA 000983 332. 38 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP DEFERRED #CGMP PAYA9L,. AN £3- DEFERRED C OM PENS { 000984 15 670. 40 MAPLEW003 STATE SAW FED INCOME TAX PA YA Oi 0009-95 7, 358.22 STATE OF MN STATE INCOME TAX :A Yi 000985 200.00 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYST -DEFERRED YDCUMPA ABLE 000987 291* 68 AFSC ME LOCAL 2725 UN I CN DUES PAYABLE AND- -FAIR SHARE FEES I CITY OF MAPLEWOOD A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A B L E DATE LO -07 -82 PAGE CHECK A M 0 U N T,C L A I! A N T P U R P O S E 000988 24. 00 METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOC UNION DUES PAYABLE 000989 277. 00 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS C0 DEFERRED COMP PAYABLE 000990 10.898. 00 CITY t CTY CREDIT UNION - _ .__..hR£DT UNION DED PAPA 000991 145.88 ROSEMARY KANE WAGE DEDUCTIONS PAYAE 000992 r 187.50 MAPLEW000 STATE BANK WAGE. DEDUCTIONS PAYAE 000993 276.90 HN BENEFIT ASSOC -t4gA INS PAYABLE 000994 160,009 WISCONSIN OPT OF REVENUE STAVE INCOME TAX PAYA 000995 14, 063.9+6 PAN STATE TREASURER -FICA F, I. C. Ao PAYABLE AND-DUE TO OTHER GOVT 000996 68 MINN STATE TREASURER MV LICENSE FEES PAYAr 030997 142,. 00 MINN STATE TREASURER STATE D/L FEES PA YASL 000993 30. 00'GUVT TRAINING SERVICE TRAVEL } TRAINING 000999 4 881. X75 MINN STATE TREASURER MV LICENSE FEES PAYAE 5q 297,7 .6* 15 NECESSARY EXPENDITURES SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING I ,,w CITY OF HAPL£WOOD A C C 0 U N T S R A Y A 8 L E DATE 10 -07 -82 PAGE CHECK*A M 0 U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S E 014 37 9 9. 96 ACE HARDWARE SUPPLIES, OFFICE 014380 11. 34 ADVANCE LIGHTING INC SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT 014 381 68.58 ADVANCE SHORING CO _._ . _ _..._SUPPLIES, JANITORIAL D14382 16.45 ALBRECHT LANDSUPING MAINTENANCE. MATERIAL 0 14 38 3 i, 4 79. 01 JAMES BAH T FEES, SERVICE Bldg. Inspector01438410BOARDOFWAT£R COMM _UT ILIT I£S AND- -OTHER CONS TRUCT.I D 14385 23. 10 AVA BURK£R E F U N U 014385 129* 96 CHAPLIN PUBLISHING LEGAL + FISCAL 014 38 7 39 3. 00 COAST TO COAST SUPPLIES, RANGE 0 I4 38 a 352.55 COLLINS ELECTRICAL CONST REP. + MA TNT. , BLDG+ 014389 64.95 RICHARD C OREGER UNIFORMS + CLOTHING 014390 1, 515.53 EASTMAN KODAK CO DUPLICATING COSTS 014391 400.00 EMP BENEFIT PLANS 'INC FEES, CONSULTING 014392 200.00 BARRY EVANS VEHICLE ALLOWANCE I 014393 39* 24 DANIEL F FAUST TRAVEL # TRAINING 014394 86068 13 F GOCDR ICH CO SUPPLIES, VEHICLE 014 395 5 02. 08 GOODYEAR SERVICE STORE SUPPLIES, VEHICLE ANC -RCP. + MAINT. v V# 014396 201. 39 DUAN E GRACE FEES, SERVICE Temp. Inspector01439721.18 HALE COMPANY INC MAINTENANCE MATERIAL* 014 398 42.25 HEJN Y RENTALS INC RENTAL, EQUIP4ENT 014399 60.00 HILLCREST GLASS CO MAINTENANCE MATERIAL; 014400 1,110. 36 HOLIDAY INN R E F U N D AND - A/R M ISCELLANEOU`. AND -m TRAVE -L + TRA INI N( 014401 35.00 INTER ASSN OF CHIEFS SUBSCRIPTIONS +MEMBER! CITY OF MAPLEWOOD A. C C 0 U 41 T S P A Y A B L E DATE 10 -Q7 -82 PAGE CHECK*A M 0 U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E D14 90000 JONES CHEMICALS SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT 014403 172. 66 KNOX LUMBER COMPANY MAINTENANCE MATERIAL! 014 40 4 125,L 2 CO INC _ _._._.._ _._ . '---'----REP. } MAINT., VEM 0.14 40 5 4, 675.75 LA IS BANK I GA N +- K ELL Y FEES, SERVICE AND -LEGAL + FISCAL Aug. Services 014406 32. 50 RICHARD. J LANG SUPPLIES, PROGRAM 014407 51,543000 NN CITIES INS TRUST INSURANCE 014408 5.00 DAVID LUTZ SUPPLIES, OFFICE 014409 194559 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC SUPPLIES, VEHICLE 014419 29.30 MAPLEWOOD REVIEW PUBLISHING 014411 87 93 METRO WASTE CO , COMM SEWAGE TREATMENT 014412 32.50 DANIEL METTLER SUPPLIES, PROGRAM 014413 70.00 MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSN SU BSCRIPT I ONS +MEMBER 014414 165.00 MN DEPARTMENT PUBLIC RENTAL, EQUIPMENT 014415 174 MN MINING + MFG Co SUPPLIES, OFFICE 0144i 6 148.22 MN U NEMPL OY COMP FUND UNEMPLOYMENT COMP. 014417 23.25 STATE OF MTV BOOKS 014418 460* 00 W A MITCHELL LEGAL + FISCAL 014419 2,055.00 MOL PRINTING PUBLISHING 014420 875010 MOTOROLA INC REP* + SAINT. q - RADIO 014421 1, 050* 25 MUNIC + PRIVATE SERVICE FEES, SERVICE Animal. Control. 014422 1 MUNIC + PRIVATE SERVICE FEES SERVICEAnima. Control 33.80 NATIONAL BUSINESS SYSTEM FEES, SERVICE014423 Microfiche Proce s s in j 014424 102.51 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO UTILITIES 014425 613e 35 NORTHERN S'TA `tES POWER CO UTILITIES 014426 687.56 NORTHWESTERN BELL TEL CO TELEPHONE CITY OF MAPLE-WOOD C HECK *A M 0 U N T 014427 1, 375. 00 D 14 42 8 48.25 014429 8 X3.95 014430 159 *90 014 431 148. 00 014432 1, 964. 88 014433 397.50 0 14 43 4 7 2. 0 0 014435 81402 014436 78'9 38 014437 212. 64 014438 13065 014439 1 65 014440 9, 9 00..06 014441 1 4 4 0.45 014 44 2 68o95 014443 38.50 014444 19011 014445 i2. 50 0 t4 446 21900 014447 "1 014448 43.43 014449 220.00 A C C 0 U 4 T S P A Y A B L E DATE 10° -07 -82 PAGE C L A IM A N T P U RP0 SE POSTMASTER POSTAGE POWER BRAKE EQUIP CO SUPPLIES, VEHICLE E K QUEHL CO _.._SUPPLIES OFFICE RADIO SHACK SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT AND - SUPPLIES, OFF ICE RA MS'EY CLINIC ASSOC P A f E ES SERVICE Physical RAMSEY COUNTY TREASURER OUTSIDE ENGINEERING AND -MI SC CONTRACTUAL A N D- FECS , , SERV ICE Microfilming RICE STREET CAR WASH REP. + MAINT. l VEHIC RICE STREET CAR WASH REP. + MAINT.. VEHIC ROAD RESCUE INC SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT SMI TESTING OUTSIDE ENGINEERING S + T OFFICE PRODUCTS SUPPLIES, OFFICE SAFE WA Y SLING CO MAINTENANCE MATERIAL T A SCHIFSKY + SONS INC MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SCHOELL + MI ARSON INC OUTSIDE ENGINEERING CITY OF ST PAUL REP. + MAINT, q RACTC AND --REP, + MAINT. , E CITY OF ST PAUL FEES SERV XCE Photo Service STO SPRING + ALIGNMENT REP* + MA1NT., VEHIG SUPERAMERICA SUPPLIES, VEHICLE AND -FUEL. + OIL SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUM BOOKS SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCU"SUBSCRIPTIONS +MEMBER J THOMAS ATHLETIC CO SUPPLIES, PROGRAM TRUCK + MFG CO REP. + MAINT., BLDG+ TURNQUIST PAPER CO 00PL.ICATING COSTS CITY OF MAPLE WOO D CHECK* A M 0 U N T 014 45 0 37.50 014451 94. 25 014 452 13.69 014453 58068 014454 55.39 014 45 5 282.98 014456 2 5 5, 3 0 014457 41. 25 01445e 1* 28 014459 214. 90 014460 Jo 138.9 3 0 14 461 8 4. 0 0 014462 57.75 014463 bG. 00 014 464 66. 00 014 465 61o90 014 S 7410 00 014467 64o00 014 46 8 G 8. 00 014469 65.0 0 014470 68006 0 1 4 471 6 8. X30 014472 bb. 00 014 47 3 7 0. 12 014474 70. 00 A C C O U N T S P A P A 3 L E DATE 10- 07!-82 PAGE C L A I M A N T P U P P 0 S E TWIN CITY FILTER SERV IN FEES, SERVICE Filters Cleaned WAGERS SUPPLIES,OFFICE WARNERS TRUEVALUE HOW MAINTENANCE MATERIAL` AND - SUPPLIES,EQUIPM! WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC SUPPLIES JANITORTAL WHITE BEAR DODGE iNC REP. +MAINT,,VEHIG. DONNA BORASH WAGES,P/T +TEMP. SANDRA DEMARS WAGES,P/T +TEMP. PAUL HAAG WAGES,P/T +TEMP. ALBERT RASCHKE TRAVEL TRAINING JEFFERY RASCH KE WAGES,P/T +TEMP. DENISE RYDEN WAGES,P/T +TEMP. NANCY J SULLIVAN WAGES,P/T +TEMP* SON THOMAS WALLACE WAGES,P/T +TEMP. MARY ALBRECHT WA GES P/T +TEMP. DOROTHY ARSORE WAGES,P/T +TEMPO EVELYN I AXD AHL WAGES,P/T +TEMP. BETTY MAE BERGLUND WAGES,P/7 +TEMP. MILDRED OEHEN WAGES,P/T +TEMP. AUDREY DUELLMAN WAGES,P/T +TEMP. BETTY L EMERSON WAGES,P/T +TEMPO PHYLLIS J ERICKSON WAGES,P/T +TEMP DELORIS FASTNER WAGES,P/T +TEMP. LORRAINE FISCHER WAGES,P/T +TEMP. ANN FOSSURGM WALES,P/T +TEMP. RI TA FREDERICKSON WAGES,P/T +TEMP. City OF MAPLEWOOD b C C 0 U N TS P A Y A 8 l E CHECK* A M 0 U N T C L A I h A N t DATE 10 -07-82 PAGE P U RP D SE 014475 78* 62 ELIZABETH HAAS WAGES.P/T TEMP. 014476 76.50 JEANNE A HAENER WAGES,P/T TEMP. 0144T 70000 WYMAN HAGEMAN .. _WAGES,P/T TEMPO 014478 64. 00 MARL YS HARTMAN WAGES,P/7 TEMP. 014479 68. 00 BEA HENDR I CKS m WAGES,P/T TEMP . 014480 74.50 JOANNE HOUGHTON __.. _ _._ ....WAGES,P/T TEMPO 014481 82.87 MARY JOHNSON WAGES,P/7 TEMP. 014482 72.00 EMMA KELSE WAGES,P/T TEMP. 0 14483 81* 81 BARBARA LEITER WAGES,P/T TEMP. 014484 73e00 LYNETTE LEONARD WAGES P/T TEMP. 0144$5 72.25 MARY LIBHARDT WAGES,P/T TEMP, 014486 68000 MARY LOU LIEDER WAGES,P/T TEMP, C14487 72. 00 JOYCE LIPI NSKI WAGES,P/T TEMP. 014 48 3 78* 62 DELO RES LOEGREN WAGES,P/T TEMP* 014489 74. 00 SHIRLEY LUTTRELL WAGES P/T TEMP. 014490 74. 00 DELORES MALLET WAGES,P/ T TEMPS. 014491 70000 MYRTLE HALM WAGES,P/T TEMP. 014492 76.50 ELEANOR MATHEWS WAGES,P/ T TEMP, 014493 66* 00 MARGARET MCDONALD WAGES,P/T TEMP. 014494 78.62 SEAN MYERS WAGES,P/T TEMP. 0 14 49 5 72000 MAXI NE, OLSON WAGES,P/ T TE "P, _ .. 014496 73000 LINDA PRI GGE WAGES,P/T TEMP. 01+497 689 00 SIBBIE SANDQUIST WAGES,P/T TEMP. 01449 8 60000 AMY SGHAD T WA GE S,P,/ T TEMPO-- 0 14 499 73* 00 JOYCE SCHMIDT WAGES,P/T TEMPO CITY OF MAPLEWOOD A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 10 -0 7 -82 PAGE' CHECK*A M 0 U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S E 014500 72000 LORRAINE SCHNEIDER WAGES* P/T +TEMP. 0 14501 700 00 EDITH STUTTLEMEYER WAGES, P/T +TEMP. 01 4 1502 KATHY SUPAN'-1AGEwS',-P---- Pt T--+-TE"Fv_&- 014 50 3 8* 00 IDA SZCZEPANSKI WAGES, P/T +TEMP. 014504 75e43 PATRICIA M THOMPSON WAGES, P/T TEMP* 014505 PZ_ 0 INARJORY- T DOLE WA IGESIV- Pf T- 4 T-Ei4.P-*— 014506 76* 50-CAROLINE WARNER WAGES, P/T +TEMP. 014507 77. 00 CHARLOTTE P WASILUK WAGES, P/T +TEMP* 014508 72000-MICHAEL WASILUK WAGES-V - P/T + 014 50 9 70*00 PATR,ICIA WERDEN WAGES* P/T +TEMP* 014510 70* 08 JUDITH WIDHOLM WAGES9 P/T +TEMP. 014511 72* 00 ELSIE WIEGERT WAGES-* P/T +TE"-e------ 014512 10409 MARCIE ES BOLD T R E F U N 0 014513 6.00 MARY FINNEGAN R E F U N 0 814514 6060 ROBERT DICKERSON SURCHARGE TAX PAYASL AND-wR E F U N 0 -Bld Permit 01'4 15015 a* go MRS GARY GERKE R E F U N D 014516 6*00 TERRY KASIANOU R E F U N 0 014517 6* 013 VICKI WELLER R E F U N D 014518 14e09 PATRICIA ZOLLINGER R E F U N 17 014519 58020 THE TRAFFIC INSTITUTE SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT 014520 120* 00 CARLETON RACQUET CLUB FEES, SERVICE Adult Special Events 014521 5*00 FRIENDS OF MEEK -SUBSCRIPTIONS+MEMBER 014522 61000 MRS EDWARD LUOKE R E F U N D 014523 10000 VA MEYER R E F U N 0 014524 95*50 MAPLE HILLS COURSE SUPPLIES, PROGRAM r CITY OF MAP EW00'D A C C 0 U H T S P A Y A 3 L E DATE 10--07-=82 PAGE CHECK`A H 0 U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S E 014525 T.24 EDWARD acMARA Telephone Expense 014526 25.00 STATE TREAS SURPLUS PROP SUBSCRIPTIONS +MEMBER 148 1951 (123* 63 C BE C K S WRITTEN TOTAL OF 207 CHECKS TOTAL 492, 73 9.78 I T Y OF NA PLE W OOD A CHECK 05285 05286 0 05,288 0 52 89 05290 0 52 91 05292 0 52 93 0 5294 05295 05296 05297 05298 0 52 99 05300 0 53 01 05302 05303 05304 05305 05306 05307 053-08 0 53 09 NAME ANDERSON BASTIAN GjREAVD JU KER NAIDA 9EHM EVANS PELCQUIN SCHLEICHER CUDE OOHERTY ZUERCHER FAUST, HAGEN NATHEYS VIGCREN A URE LI US SELVOG GREEN S CHART SCHAOT Y I ETOR HENSLEY BASTY'R COLLINS PAYROLL REPORT CERTIFICATION REGISTER CROSS PAY ORMAN G 275.00 ARY W 275.00 OHN C 350000 RA NCES L 275.00 ARYLEE T 215.00 OIS N 586.62 ARRY R 1,817e54 LF'RE D J 79 6.27 OHN F 116.88 ARRY i 191.54 ATHLEEN H 31..10 OHN L 115.39 ANIEL E 1, 446.46 RLINE O 888.92 LANA K 677.54 ELORES A 536.62 DCILLE E 1, 35 0.46 E TT Y D 811.25 HYLLIS C 755.59 MY L 6.50 EANNE L 215.36 OKRA INE S 592.12 ATRICIA A 25 EBOR AH A 532.16 ENNETH v 1, 504.62 PAGE 1 CHECK DATE 09 -24 -82 NET PAY ` 18 256.57 254.61 230.20 239.04 407.44 1, 210.87 220.72 11 -6.88 145.44 221.61 115.13 950.94 398.58 473.93 399.79 7 05.2 9 5 08.3 5 5 21.75 6.5 0 178,28 408o49 193.94 257.19 209.9b eITY CF MALE WCOD CHECK 0 5310 05311 05312 0 5313 05314 05315 0 53 16 0 5317 05.318 05319 0 53 20 0 53 21 0 53 22 i 0 53 23 0 53 24 05325 05.326 0 53 27 0 53 28 05329 05330 05331 0 53 32 0.53 33 05334 NAME HAGEN a?lATH RICHIE SVENDSEN A R N CLO ATCHISON BOWMAN CAHANES CLAUSON O REGER GREEN HALWEG HEINZ HERBERT JAQUITH LANG MCNULTY NE E HAN , JR METTLER MOESCHTER M CRE LL I PEL TI ER S KALMAN SMITH S TAFNE PAYROLL REPORT CERTIFICATION REGISTER GROSS PAY THOMAS L 1, 424. 31 JOY E 553039 CAROL L 501023 JOANNE N 709039 DAVID L 1,182.92 JOHN H 19 036.15 RICK A 629.54 ANTHONY G 1, 27 3.15 DALE K 1, 036.15 RICHARD C 1, 272.60 N GRMA N L 1, 207* 38 KEVIN R 1,056.00 STEPHEN 3 774* 46 MICHAEL J 1, 016. 77 DANIEL R 784.14 RICHARD i 1, 056.00 JOHN J 19206.92 JAMES E 1.9047e26 DANIEL B 1, 0 36.61 RICHARD M 1 , 9 016.77 RAYMOND J 1, 016; 77 WILLIAM F 1,163.08 DONALD W 1 016. 77 SCOTT A 53.60 GREGORY L 1, 016.77 PAGE 2 CHECK DATE 09 - 24 -82 NET PAY 324.08 369.0, 300.48 457.59 429.85 702.x.2 4 24.4 0 167.30 168,48 725.18 651.41 550.70 509.46 606.59 5i3.87 581149 181.08 554.79 689.01 157.58 689.89 654.69 177.21 53.6 0 637.97 ITY GF MAPLEWGQD CHECK 0 53 35 0 53 36 0 53 37 05338 0 53 39 05340 05341 0 53 42 05343 0 53 44 0 53 45 0 53 46 05347 0 53 48 0 53 49 05350 05351 05352 05353 05354 05355 05356 05357 05358 053 59 NAME STILL STCCKTON Z APPA B F C KER GRAF LEE NELSON RA ZSKA Z OFF RYAN V OR JERK Y OO NGRE N EMBERTSON S CHAD T FLAUGHER FULLER NELSON NELSON RABINE WILLIAMS BARTA HAIDER WEGWERTH LASS FRESERG PAYROLL REPORT CERTIFICATION REGISTER GROSS PAY VERNON T 997.38 OARRELL T 1,084.67 JOSEPH A 1, 208077 RONALD D 1* 065.23 DAVID M 1, 065.23 ROGER W 1 JON A 1, 0 6 5.23 CARGL 4 1 DALE E 1, 142.89 MICHAEL P 1. RJBERT E i, i72.04 JAMES G 1 0 39.49 JAMES m 9 44.31 ALFRED c I 12 7.54 JAYME L 711.42 JAMES D 6.3 0.62 KAREN A 65 7.33 ROBERT D 1, 231.68 JANET L 549.69 D U A NE 1* 0 5 5.54 MARIE L 477.69 KENNETH G 1, 391.. 08 JUDITH A 490.62 WILLIAM c 1, .157.08 RONALD L 824.00 PAGE 3 CHECK DATE 09 -24 -82 NET PAY _ 600 *66 707.26 7 33.53 2 33.9 523.12 640.02 35.i2 850.73. 169.05 509.58 288.74 6 61..44 627.36 674.62 462.94 455.32 415.21 660.66 380.43 4 91.97 3.15.34 229.34 3 51.73 573.83 48'5.54 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK 05360 05361 05362 053£3 05364 0 53 65 05366 05367 0 53 68 0 53 69 05370 05371 05372 fl 53 73 05374 0 53 *75 05376 05045 05377 05378 05379 05380 05381 0 53 82 05383 HEL.EY HOCHBAN KANE KLAUSING MEYER PRETTNER RE I NERT TEVLINtJR ELIAS GE ISS LER GESSELE PECK PI LLAT ZKE WYMAN LUTZ SREHEI M ED SON NUL WEE N ADEAU NUTESON OWEN MACDONALD MULVANEY SRE NNER KRUMMEL PAYROLL REPORT PAGE 4 CERTIFICATION REGISTER CHECK DATE 09- 24-82 NAME GROSS PAY NET PAY RONALD 824* 00 538 *88 JOSEPH H 824.00 547.65 MICHAEL R 939.88 424.43 HE NRY F 24.0 0 450e22 GERALD W 824 *00 439.50 JOSEPH B 1, 241.00 7.6 8 *53 EDWARD A 824.00 538x" HARRY 824.00 518,50 JAMES G 981 *69 609 *01 WALTER M 935* 08 563.58 DAMES T 893.54 603.03 DENNIS L 981 *69 485,20 DAVID 1,157.08 792.12 JAMES tai 1v172.7'8 747 *72 DAVID P 562* 62 384* i8 ROGER W 769 *60 490.07 DAVID 8 918o75 612 *50 GEORGE W 769* 60 493.03 EDWARD A 8 95.41 6 00 * 92 LAVER NE S 1, 088000 476o55 GERALD C 840.00 5 00 x.86 JOHN E 908* 80 459978 DENNIS M 878.40 553.95 LDIS J 725e18 299.2 0 BARBARA A 27 0* 40 126.98 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD J CHECK PAYROLL REPGRT PAGE 5 CERTIFICATION REGISTER CHEEK DATE 09-m.24-32 NAME - GROSS PAY NET PAY 0 53 84 DDEGA RD ROBER T D 1 3 64.77 842.83 0 53 85 STAPLES PA ULI NE M 1,6 86.3 5 0 53 86 BURKE MYLES R 824.00 453.82 05387 GERMAIN UAVID A 824.00 531.00 05388 GUSINDA MELVIN J 110088000*616.11 05389 HELEY ROLAN D 8 824.00 548.63 05.390 LEMON JEFFREY S 88.20 88028 05391 MARUSKA MARK A 8 26.52 5 30.42 05392 RASCHKE ALBERT 172.28 153..77 85393 SANDQUIST TH0MA.S J 38.00 38.00 04924 SANTA REED E 824.0:0 472.81 05394 TAUBMAN DOUGLAS J 804.00 517,20 05395 WARD RoY G 328.62 253.25 05396 GREW JANET M 684.92 448e59 05397 SOUTTER CHRISTINE 68+4.92 47 0.04 0 5398 CHLEBECK JUDY N 711e23 296e43 05399 JLSUN GEUFF RE Y W 1 34 0.31 8 22.75 0 54 00 EKSTRAND THOMAS G 932.83 573.49 0'5a401 JOHNSON RANDALL L 910.x'4 6$6.22 05402 JSTROM MARJO RIE 1, 133.54 709e38 0 54 03 WENGER ROBERT J 857.54 497.58 CHECK REGISTER TOTALS 101, 725.86 55,321.96 0 l..e MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director Er RE: Public Hearing and Resolutions - 1983 Budget -- DATE: September 30, 1982 c; Federal revenue sharing laws require that a public heari nq be held concerni nq the City's proposed 1983 Budget and the use of revenue sharing monies. A cop of the public hearing notice is attached for informational purposes (Exhibit A) . Adoption of the 1983 Budget requires passage of a resolution. The expenditure amounts listed i n the proposed resolution are based upon the proposed 1983 Budget delivered to the Council on August 25th after the adjustments itemized in Exhibit B. The. following is a summary of the General Fund adjustments made: Original Current Proposed Exhi'bi t B Proposed Budget Adjustments Budget 939,139 939,139 Beginning Fund Balance 5 50 5,241,250 Reven 307 272 , 740 Transfers in from the Revenue Sharing Fund 5 50,790 5 Expenditures 30,000 30 Transfers out to Special Assessment Fund 176 34,260 141,740 Transfer out to Capital Improvement Fund 731 731 Ending Fund Balance The proposed resolution for adoption of the 1983 Budget is attached as Exhibit C. As in past years, this resolution provides that all budget changes require City. Council approval except for minor chanqes which can be approved by the City Manager. In the past, the City Manager was authorized to implement budget changes of up to $1,000 without Council approval. For 1983, the resolution increases this limit to ,1, 500 - The last paragraph of this resolution implements the new procedure of transferring revenue sharing monies to the General Fund for expenditure in order to simplify accounting and auditing.procedures. A second resolution (Exhibit D) must be adopted that levies taxes payable in 1983 that will provide an. amount sufficient enough to support the 1983 Budget. The second part of this resolution adjusts the tax levies previously certified for all existing bond issues. It should be noted that these previously certified bond issue tax levies were initially established at the time bonds were sold and equal the estimated unassessed improvement project costs. The scheduled tax levies have to be adjusted annually to finance the debt service requirements based upon the special assessments actually levied and investment interest earnings. • Adoption of both resolutions is recommended. DFF:inb 0 EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED 1983 BUDGET NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Maplewood City Council will hold a public hearing to consider proposed uses of federal revenue sharing funds by the City of Maplewood during 1983 and the relationship of such funds to the City's entire 1983 Budget. The hearing will begin at 6:00 p.m. on October 7, 1982, and will be held in the Council Chambers at 1380 Frost Avenue. All citizens w i l l have the opportunity to provide written and oral comments on the possible uses of revenue sharing funds and to ask questions concerning the entire budget and the relationship of revenue sharinq funds to the entire budget. The following is a summary of the proposed budget: Proposed Proposed Revenue 1983 Budqet Sharinq Portion General Government 6 0. Finance 174 0- City Clerk 320 0- Public Safety 2 307 Public Works 3 40 Community Services 801 40 Community Development 239,880 40M Totals T1 307 The revenue sharing funds are proposed to be transferred to the General Fund and used to partly finance the contracts between the City and its three fire departments: Gladstone, Parksi de and East County Line. A detailed breakdown of the above w i l l be available for public inspection during normal business hours at the City Hall, 1380 Frost Avenue. ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST in this matter are invited to attend and be heard. Senior Citizens are encouraged to attend and comment. Handicapped persons needing assistance or aids should contact the City Clerk before the meetinq. e-exrs. Aurelius City Clerk Publish: September 22, 1982 Post: In City Hall for public display EXHIBIT B CHANGES MADE TO THE PROPOSED 1983 BUDGET 50 1. For the General Fund on page 18, the estimates revenues for Account 3622 should be reduced from $50,790 to $0 due to termination of the 3M Company fire protection contract. 50,790 2. For the General Fund on page 47, the appropriation for Account 4480 should be reduced from $614,660 to $563,870 due to termination of the 3M Company fire protection contract. 34 3. For the Revenue Sharing Fund on Page 69, the estimated revenues should be revised from $230,180 to $195,920. Also, the transfer out to the General Fund should be revised from $307,000 to 272,740. 34 4. For the General Fund on Page 20, the transfer in from the Revenue Sharing Fund should be revised from $307,000 to $272,740. Also , the transfer out to the Capital Improvement Fund should be revised from $176,000 to $141,740. 6 50 For the General Fund on page 25, the appropriation for Account 4480 should be reduced from $74,660 to $68,500 in order to hold legal .costs at the 1982 level. 1 6. For the General Fund on page 46, the appropriation for Account 4480 should be reduced from $54,500 to $52,580 in order to reduce the Fire Departments requested contract increases from 9% to 5% for paramedic assistance services. 19,270 7. For the General Fund on page 47, the appropriation for Account 4480 should be further reduced (see #2 above) from $563,870 to $544,600 in order to reduce the Fire Department's requested contract increases from 9 to 5% for fire fighting services. 27,350 8. For the General Fund on page 34, the appropriation for Account 4910 (contingency) should be increased from $290,730 to $318,080 i norder to offset the decreased appropriations itemized i n the preceding changes #5 #7. EXHIBIT C RESOLUTION ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR 1983 BE IT, RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the budget for 1983 is hereby adopted with the following appropriations for each department and fund: General Fund: General Government $ 680 Finance 174 City Clerk 151 Public Safety 2 Public Works 939 Community Services 687 Community Development 239 General Fund Total 5 Hydrant Charge Fund: Public Works 61 Sewer Fund: City Clerk 169 Public Works 1 V, E. M. Fund: Public Works 299,470 Park Development Fund: Community Services 114,000 Debt Service Funds 221 Special Assessment Fund - -Debt Service Accounts 5 Total 13 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that all budget changes shall require City Council approval except for budget transfers of up to $1,500 between accounts which shall be implemented upon approval by the City Manager. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that authorization is hereby given to transfer 307,000 of revenue sharing monies to the General Fund to partly finance the contracts between the City and its three fire departments: Gladstone, Parks i de and East County Line. SCHEDULE A BONDS & INTEREST LEVIES COLLECTIBLE 1983 BOND ISSUES Water Main Extension Improvement Consolidated Improvement Municipal Building General Obligation Improvement General Obligation Improvement General Obligation Impr. Sanitary Sewer General Obligation Improvement General Obligation Improvement General Obligation Improvement General Obligation Improvement General Obligation Improvement State Aid Bonds General Obligation Improvement General Obligation Improvement General .Obligation Improvement General Obligation Improvement General Obligation Improvement General Obligation Improvement General Obligation Improvement - Series 1 Public Works Building Bonds General Obligation Improvement- Series 2 General Obligation Bonds - 1979 Fire Station Bonds Prin.Code Per Bond Amount. Amount Date No.Regis Levied 600M 9/15/64 509 54 364 975M 12/1/64 509 20 175M 5/1/65 301 16 16 835M 12/1/65 509 27 750M 12/1/66 509 24 645M 7/1/67 503 12 9 450M 12/1/67 504 12,000 3 380M 12/1/68 505 6 1 12/1/69 514 45 605M 12/1/70 521 10 13 1 8/1/71 514 65 540M 8/1/71 302 1 5/1/72 510 30,000 28 670M 12/1/72 511 30,000 28 2,175M 7/1/73 513 95,000 1 11/1/74 521 45 45 1 12/1/75 521 75 75 1 5/1/76 521 128,600 128 3 4/1/17 519 12 128,300 995M 4/1/77 303 78 72 3 10/1/77 520 65 825M 8/1/79 522 53 43 470M 8/1/80 304 84 979,248 591,000 TAX LEVIES PLEDGED TO REDEEM G. 0. REFUNDING IMPROVEMENT BONDS 1974 TAX LEVIES PLEDGED TO REDEEM G. 0. REFUNDING IMPROVEMENT BONDS 1977 M MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Associate Planner--Johnson SUBJECT: Plan Amendment (Reconsideration) LOCATION: 2696 Hazelwood Avenue APPLICANT: Health Resources, Inc. OWNER: Health Resources, Inc. DATE: October 1, 1982 SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL Request r 4. Action b7r Courc 4 I tdow M U G 1 fJiL 0 d ...._. _- M........_.. Ea cd_ Date Approval of a plan amendment from SC- Service Commercial 'to RB- Residential Business. Proposal 1. Construct a 72 unit cooperative residence for the more "frail" senior citizens .See Map five.) . 2. The existing building would continue to be used for the applicant's offices, community health education, and outreach programs. This facility would also be used by the seniors for dining, gymnasium, convenience shops and meeting9 room facilities. 3. See the applicant's letter of request. 4. This site is one of two sites recommended for a split site seniors' residence development in conjunction with the Housing and Redevelopment Authority's (HRA)tandem senior citizen /first -time home buyer program proposal. (See Pl anni n 9section.) CONCLUSION Analysis The present service commercial designation for this site would permit overlyintensi.ve uses relative to the surrounding land uses and should be changed.Designation as residential-business would permit the applicant to continue to use the ex- school facility, as well as construct a seniors' residence of from 104 two - bedroom to 208 one - bedroom units on the remaining six acres. This densit isyconsistentwiththeapplicant's request and would not be out of character with surrounding land uses. Neighborhood objections have been raised on the basi s , of increased traffic, property devaluation, and loss of recreation opportunities. The HRA felt these arguments are unjustified. Th4 s site is desirable for a seniors' residence because of the residential neighbor-hood atmosphere and opportunities afforded by the park for interaction amon 9seniorsandareayouth. Bus service will eventually convenient, when extended to the future hospital site on Beam and Hazelwood Avenues. Because - of these attributes this site is considered by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority to be an 1 i y a excel ent choicece for the proposed seniors' residence, Recommendation Approval of the enclosed resolution amend-ing the Land Use Plan from SC -Sre viceCommercialtoRB- Residential Business for 2696 Hazelwood Avenue. BACKGROUND Site Description I . Si ze : 6.13 acres - seniors' residence 3.88 acres - existing building 20 Existing Use: a. Parcel one (map three) : Two ball fields, leased b the Ci for oyy softball and tee -ball. This lease permits the "use of the bale diamond, providing said use doe not conflict with the use of the property by the applicant." b. Parcel two (map three) : Existing building, presently being used for the applicant's offices and community service programs, including out - patient treatment . for chemical dependence, home health care, and community health education. Surrounding Land Uses North and East: Hazelwood Park South: A single dwelling on a 4.4 acre parcel, planned for residential lower density. West: Hazelwood Avenue. West of Hazelwood Avenue, several single dwellings on larger lots. Past Actions 8-7-80: Council approved a special use permit for the applicant to operate the community service programs, with the following conditions: 1. The permit shall be good for one year. It may be renewed if Council determines that the use had no adverse affect on the neighborhood. The concerns for parking spaces can be discussed at that time. 2. Striping of the parking lot for 52 spaces. 3. The city shall have a continued use of the ball diamond providing it does not conflict with the use of the applicant. 4. The City shall sign a hold - harmless agreement absolving Health Resources, Inc. of any injury liabilities for City use of the facilities. 50 The applicant shall appear before the Council if an increase of the number of parking stalls beyond the 52 spaces is needed within one year-preceding the renewal of their special use permit. 8 -6-81: a. Council renewed the special use permit for the Health- Resources Center for one year since there had not been any problems caused by this facility after one year of operation. 2 b. Council approved a parking lot expansion for the facility. i t . Thi sy expansion has been completed, 8-23-82: Counci renewed the applicant's special use ermi t for the HealthealthResourcesCenterforoneyear. ;.. 9-12 -82: a. Council rejected the applicant's resent request.'! ! The mPq ot' ion for approval failed for a lack of support. b. Council authorized the HRA to proceed with the ro osed tandemPPseniorresidence/first-time home buyer program, less the applicant'ssite. 9- 27 -82: Council moved to reconsider the applicant's ro osal on October 7PP . DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS Planni 1. Land Use Plan designation: SC- Service Commercial 2. Policy Criteria from the Plan: a. The Service Commercial classification is oriented to facilities which arelocalorcommunity -wide scale. While a full range of commercial uses is permitted in this district, certain types of facilities which may be of a high- intensity nature, such as fast -food restaurants, discount sales out - lets, gas stations, and lightht industrial uses h • z 9 shouldd be permitted subjecttospecificperformanceguidelines. The objective of establishing this district is to provide for a wide variety of commercial uses compatiblewiththecharacteranddevelopmentpmentoftheneighborhoodsinwhich. they arelocated. b. The Residential Business classification includes high density residentialandofficeuses, and should provide some transition between a commercial use that generates a high amount of traffic, such as a Diversified Centerandresidentialuses. c. Page 21 -5 : Housing within the community should be flexible to P ermi t a mixture of people in all housing areas regardless of age, ethnic, racial,cultural, or socioeconomic backgrounds. d. Page 18-8: Housing should be provided which meets the P h Y s i cal and psychological needs of all persons, e. Page 18-9: Locate multiple family housing in areas not inferior to those general used for conventional single - family housing. f. Page C-37: 1) An elderly housingn project should - - -Y g p be 1 orated i n a res 1 dential district, but with good access to commercial facilities and s'ervi ces , such as grocer 'stores dru stores, medical clinics and passive recreational areas. When these services are more than one - quarter or one-half m i l e from a site, access becomes a problem. l 0 J 2) Access to community services which are not in close proximity to the site should be provided by an adequatepublicorprivatetransportationsystem. 3) The housing facility should be located so that 'quick response of emergency services (i . e. medical , ambul ance , police, and fire) can be provided, especial when these are not provided on-site. 4) Whenever possible, open spaces for ardens or recreation9createon should be programmed into an elderly housing project. 3. Zoning: F -Farm Residence 4. Dens i ty': 34 people /net acre would be the maxi mum ermi ss i bl e density. p ensity. Aseniors' residence with 104 two - bedroom to 208 one - bedroom units could beconstructedontheundevelopedportionofthissite (parcel one - -ma three). 5. Plan Update a. Amendments to the Land Use Plan authorized from March 3 1982 to Marchch I5 ,1982, resulted in a net loss of 61 acres of high and medium densityacreagecity-wide. b. 39 acres of higher density l and were eliminated in the Hazelwoodhood.neighbor- 6. Housing and Redevelopment Authorit .p o ,ty (HRA) Housing Proposal. a. On September 2, the HRA accepted the findings and recommendations of a feasibility study conducted by Gary Sol omonson Associates for the HRA's proposed tandem senior residence /first -time home buyers program and approve the conceptrecommendedthattheCouncil g A split site seniors' residence is recommended. The former Hazelwood Schoolsiteisrecommendedforthe "frail elderly" component and the Woodmark sitoGervaisAvenue, west of White Bear Avenue) is recommended for the youngeremptynester" component. b. On September 22, the HRA : 1) Reaffirmed its September 2 recommendation to ursue a split siteppto seniors' development, including the applicant's site. The applicant'ssiteisthe _referred 1palternativeve for a frail elderly development on the basis that: a) The former school facilities (gymnasium, congregate di ni n andg,meeting rooms) could result in a significant cost -,Savings relative to development of hpthe facility on the Woodmark site. b) The vistas, proximity to open space, residential neighborhood 'settingandopportunityforinteractionwithyouthareattributeshighlydesirableforseniors' ho g y 2) Indicated that it (HRA) would probably not desire to ursuep a seniors' residence development if there would not be a "frail pelderly" component. 4 The only alternative available would be to construct both components ('frail and younger empty nesters residences) on the Woodmark site, The developer, however, is skeptical about the marketability of such a development_. c. if the fi rst -time home buyer component of the HRA' s tandem program is to z remain as an option, the application must be initiated no-later than October 8. A decision on the Hazelwood School site must be made on October 7. Public Works 1. Sewer and water lines have adequate capacity for a large residential structure. 2. .County Road C and Hazelwood are designated as minor arterial roadways. Parks and Recreation 1. Development of this site would result in the loss of one if. not both, of the tee-ball playing fields currently being leased from the applicant. 2. On August 9, the Parks and Recreation Commission discussed the potential loss of the play fields but made no recommendation. 3. The applicant acknowledges that the northerly field would be lost. However, a goal of planning seniors' residences is to ensure opportunities for the interaction of youth and the seniors. The preliminary site plans indicate the southerly site will be retained and enhanced for youth as well as seniors' recreation. Citizen Comments Neighboring property owners have expressed opposition to the appl i cant's proposal on the basis that the development would increase traffic on Hazelwood, devalue residential property, and reduce recreation opportunities in the neighborhood for children. jW Enclosures: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line Map 3. Site Plan Map 4. _ Land Use Plan Map 5. Proposed Site and Building Schematic 6. Applicant's Letter of Request 7. Resolution 5 P BEAM r_ rr 1......Mr w -. r w Ko if /m o n - -- AVE. I ISE AM AVE _ RApATZ w...r•..rw.. r - .r w- err .,r Ar i I i ri.„ N fi 4 r t o •t I+ J 1 Ln 1 JQ COUNTY r uj fr i GERVAIS w CD SE XTA iNT AVE. 1 ? v ' AV G ER VA I S I AVE. FG ANDVIEw AV E. VIKING DR. SHERREN PE 1 AVE. COPE AVE LARK AVE. N LARK ivE. t 2 LAURIE RD. Z LAURIE ' R0. / ``' 25 5 -AND ] iHURST ] 7 r AVE. L;' L aVE_ } BU RCE /- AVE c o ELDRIDG AVE o . J W BEIMOti a AVE N c i LE SKtLLMA N m AvE- HAR LRIS G( QO RKE I- 44 W I Q4. ROSE IWOO 0 AVE. ' S R Y A N Oy .Ftv E Q. PJ ac Q O to 1+ d ¢ t CIRL, ell IO u CIO w • J W .i r1 .. j - — — F- Map 1 KOHLMAN AVE. ,ii p t1 Y K_ *!LMAN ! Z.l ROAD ! > AlF vn W }_ 1 , Z v 3 E DCEHILL RD. Q - Z --J Z t _ DEMONT u. AVE.W . C = o =BROOK .: E . - - - _ m it LOCATION MAP Q N f O . j 1 j i 1 or t R i i t. :E LLr- C of - i_t; T f TC- O tV I,IJ J s p MJ • o Y , r t 1 i r • 7-71ZA o,t o3ro. - 2666 , Iso'j 1559 1585 s G r y r..• . ......nr Co • •_ a A S Map 2 PROPERTY LINE MAP Q N 0 0 m 0 0 0 CD o co 0 0 0 Map 3 SITE PLAN 577 70 4. Df 0. 1 U RH isc interchange - _ 'r.. CiilCl al arterial .- %y...•.+..b.. interchangeTa--d-n-a"i-ST _ ., _ -._ major collector 4ft 17. R g Bw - DC I L L it4 r t I minor astcrial t . J .. .. 0jz"41a tip ..;' • . Osd LS Rni I I - Rm 1 Os Rl 0 INOs C ' minor arterial t m S C. CRmR1j".9041-11 - Os T Os. 1 =3 L _ Os Al n Bw R 1. P sc i LS C R mahfRm _ major collector BW rn BW __. +, _ i AMinterchnge -;c'''"r, In ator rteria emmam interchange i home I-me r L _ 1 ,/+"'. . y - - -.T i . \ .\ • „ y...J l ' 1 ow 0 Map 4 Hazelwood NEIGRBORHO"D LAND USE PLA.4 4 N RESOLUTION NO. COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD - RESOLUTION APPROVING A LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT WHEREAS, a proceedings for the amendment of the Maplewood ComprehensiveMunicipalPlanentitled "Plan for Maplewood" has been initiated by Health Resources, Inc. for a change of Planned Use from SC- Service Commercial to RB- Resi denti al - Business, for the following generally described area: Except Hazelwood Park, all that property lying north of the south 510 feet in the Southwest quarter (SW 1/4) of the Southeast quarter (SE 1/4) of Section three (3), Township 29, Range 22. WHEREAS, the procedural history of the proposed amendment is as follows: 1. The City of Maplewood has a Comprehensive Municipal Plan entitled Plan for Maplewood" adopted pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 670, Laws 1965 (the Municipal Planning Act., Minnesota Statutes Annotated, Sections 462.351 to 462.364 thereof) ; 2. 'Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.355, Subdivision 2 and 3 thereof, providepvde for amendment of the Comprehensive Municipal Plan' or of any section thereof; 3. An amendment of the Comprehensive Municipal Plan has been proposed by Health Resources, Inc. and referred to the Maplewood Planning Commission, which held a public hearing on the 16th day of August, 1982 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, 462.355, Subdivision 2 thereof, notice by mail and publication having been given, heard all who wished to be heard, considered all written and staff reports and analysis. WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Planning Commission, having considered the testimony of those present, all written submissions to it and staff reports, approved the amendment on the following findings of fact: 1.. The present designation of SC- Service Commercial is. overly intensive and out -of- character with adjacent planned uses. 2. The resultant density would not be inconsistent with the surrounding land uses. 3. The site is well suited for a seniors' residence. 4. Six of 39 acres of higher density residential land would te regained which had been lost in this-neighborhood during the Plan Update process, t NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mapl ewood - Ci ty Counci 1 hereby certifies the above-described. amendment to its Comprehensive -Municipal Plan entitled "Plan for Maplewood." Adopted this day of 19 Mayor Manager ATTEST: Clerk s X /& - J . 5. PUBLIC HEARING 4 A. Plan Amendment: 2696 Hazelwood (HRI) Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting approval for a Plan amendment from SC, Service Commercial to RB, Residential Business. Staff is recommending approval of the request. He indicated the hearing notice was properly published. _- Bill Knutson, Health Service Development, 2696 Hazelwood, - the proposal is to construct residential restructures for seniors in Maplewood. Chairman Prew asked if there was anyone else present who wished to speak regarding this proposal. Ron Erickson, 2673 Hazelwood Avenue, said he was originally informed the site may be too small and possibly would not be considered for senior housing development. He basi-cally objects to the proposal , does not wi sh further development in the area. He is concerned with the added traffic in the area. James Love, 2661 Hazelwood, also concerned with added development in the area and additional traffic. The Commission explained the difference between the Plan designations and what type of use is permitted in the categories and al the difference between the-Plan and the zoning districts. They discussed with the applicant the type of units to be constructed, and also the phasing scheduled for the hospital development at Beam and Hazelwood. Chairman Prew closed the publi hearing portion of the meeting, low Commissioner Fischer reviewed the process of site selection for the seniors residence, _ Commissioner S1 etten mo ve d the P 1 a nn i ng _Commission recommend to the_ Ci.ty__Council. _approva.1 o the resolution amendi n the Land Use Plan from SC- _Sei_osm_eroi al to RB, Residential Business for 2696 Hazelwood Avenue. Commissioner Howard seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Barrett, Fischer, Hej ny, Howard, Ki shel , Prew, S1 etten, Whitcomb Commissioner S1 etten moxed the P1 anni na Commission recom to Ci t Counci 1 a roval of a three- ear time extension for the c' u -se —pey.. p t_LO unit sere c e ro rams at 2696 Hazelwood Avenue since there b not been any -prgbl ema caued by t i s f ' tv dur' WQYe 9 operatio Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes- -Commi ssioners Barrett, Fischer, He j ny, Howard, Ki shel , Prew, Sl etten , Whitcomb -a 6. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 7, COMMUNICATIONS is A F .. / GHARLES W BRIGGS (1887-1978) J. NEIL MORTON GOLE OEHLER A. LAURENCE DAVIS FRANK HAMMOND LEONARD J KEYES B. G. HART JOHN M. SULLIVAN BERNARD P. FRIEL BURT E. SWANso.x M. J. GALVIN, J R . DAVID G. FORSBERG JOHN J. MCNEELY GERALD H. SWANso MCNEIL V. SEYMOUR, JR. TERENCE N. DOTLE RICHARD H, KYLE JONATHAN H. MORGAN JOHN L. DEVNEY R. L. SORENSON PETER H. SEED PHILIP L. BRLNER SAMUEL L. HANSON RONALD E. ORCHARD AvRON L. GORDON JOHN R. KENEFICH JOHN R. FRIEDMAN DAVID J. SPENCER DANIEL J. COLE, JR. PETER .W. SIPHINS DOUGLAS L. SHOR MICHAEL H. JERONIMUS R. SCOTT DAVIES JAMES W. LITTLEFIELD JOHN B. VAN DE NORTH, JR STEVEN Z. KAPLAN RICHARD G. MARK ANDREW G. BECHER JEROME A. GETS STEVE A. BRAND MARK W. WESTRA ALAN H. MACLIN LAW OFFICES BRIGGS AND MORGAN PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANH BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 2452 I D S CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 612) 291 -1215 October 1, 1982 Vii_ .. ... m. . w+•..b..oY Ms. Lucille Aureliva 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN RE: City of Maplewood $1,140,000 Commercial Development Revenue Note of 1982 Ernerald Inn of Maplewood Project) Dear Lu: REPLY TO MARK R. MILLER JEFFREY F. SHAW DAVID G' GREENING DAVID B. SAND BETTY L. HUM GHARLES R. HAYNOR Rocco J MAFFEI, JR. ANDREA M. BOND MARTIN H. FISH JOHN BULTENA ROBERT L. DAVIS RICHARD H. MARTIN TRUDY H. SCHROER MARY L. IPPEL ROBYN L. HANSEN WILLIAM J. JOANIS MARGARET K. SAVAGE JEANNE M. FORNERIS BRIAN G. BELISLE TONY R .STEMBEBGER MARY SCHAFFNER EVINGER MICHAEL H. STREATER STEVEN T. HALVERSON JOHN H. LINDsTRoM RICHARD D. ANDERSON SALLY A.SCOGGIN JAMES F. GHRISTOFFEL BARBARA JEAN D'AQUILA DAVID G. McDONA.LD BRUCE W. MOOTY VIRGINIA A. DWYER ERIC N TRUDY R.GASTEAZORO ELIZABETH J. ANDREWS PETER G. HALLS GHARLES B. ROGERS OF COUNSEL RICHARD E. KYLE SAMUEL H. MORGAN FRANK N. GRAHAM St. Paul Enclosed in connection with the above referenced matter are copies of the following: 11 Final Note Resolution 2, Loan Agreement 3, Pledge Agreement 4, Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Financing Statement 5, Construction Loan Agreement 6, Assignment of Rents and Leases 7. Guaranty Agreement 8. Various closing certificates and opinions The reason that it is necessary that we have the rehearing on this matter is because the Notice of Public Hearing for the preliminary hearing was not published 15 days prior to the public hearing. The Commissioner of Energy, Planning and Development will not approve an industrial revenue bond project unless a minimum of 15 days published notice is given prior to the public hearing. U BRIGGS AWD MORGAN Ms. Lucille Aurelius October 1, 1982 Page Two In addition the adoption of the f final Note Resolution is scheduled for October 7,. 1982 after the public rehearing. Because of the necessity for a re- hearing the purchaser of the Note is requiring that this Note be closed as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Mary L. Ippe 1 MLI /jw Enclosures e rtd < c :ion by Cov - rMEMORANDUM , r c s t? r? TO: CITY MANAGER BARRY EVANS Y FROM : CITYCITY CLERK. e REGARDING: PRELIMINARY APPROVAL - INDUSTRIAL REVENUE NOTES - EMERALD INN DATE: AUGUST 3, 1982 Developers of the Emerald Inn Project are requesting approval for a $1,500,000 In- dustrial Revenue Note to construct a 66 unit Emerald Inn economy motel on County Road D east of White Bear AVenue. Representatives of Emerald Inn will be at the meeting to present their ro osal.P P APPLICATION /AGREEMENT FOR TAX EXEMPT MORTGAGE REVENUE NOTE FINANCING This Agreement is hereby entered into between the City of Map ewood , Minnesota, hereinafter called the "City" and Emerald Inn of Maplewood hereinafter called the "applicant". The applicant is requesting financing for a developmentgent project and desires that the City issue notes according to the terms of the Municipal Industrial Development Act of 1967 as amended. In order for the application to be considered by the City, the applicant hereby agrees to pay all costs involved in the legal and fiscal review of the proposed project and all costs involved in the issuance of said notes to finance the project. It is further agreed and understood that the City reserves the right to deny any application for financing in any stage of the proceedings prior to adopting the resolution authorizing the issuance of notes. 1. APPLICANT: a. Business Name - Emerald Inn of Maplewood b. Business Address - 771 NE Harding Street, Minneapolis, Mn 55413 c. Business Form (corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, etc.) - d. Authorized Representative - Chayton Corporation, 771 NE Harding, Mpls , Mn e. Telephone 612/378 -2563 2. NAME (S) OF MAJORITY STOCKHOLDERS, OFFICERS & DIRECTORS, PARTNERS, PRINCIPALS: a. Judson Dayton b Duncan Dayton c. Edmund Chute d . Fred Chute, Jr. e. David Chute f. Arthur B. Johnson 3. INCLUDE A PROPERTY LINE MAP SHOWING EXACT LOCATION OF PROPERTY, NAMES OF ADJACENT STREETS, AND DIMENSIONS OF PROPERTY. 4_. NATURE OF BUSINESS a. Briefly describe the project proposal : 66 -unit Emerald Inn economy motel similar to the Northrid e Emerald Inn at 694 & Lexin ton in Arden Hills. OVER) v b. Is the project associated with an existing Maplewood Business? Yes No x If yes: Relocation Expans Rehabilitation 5. AMOUNT OF CITY FINANCING BEING REQUESTED: $ 1, 5001000 6. PURPOSE OF REQUESTED FINANCING: To construct economy motel a Business purpose to be served To provide modern, attractive, economical sleeping rooms, and to provide jobs to the area. b. Public purpose to be served. 7. BUSINESS PROFILE: a. Number of employees in Maplewood: Full Time Part Time Before this project After this project 20 b. Projected annual sales: $ 400,000 c. Projected annual payroll: $ 8. NAMES OF: a. Financial consultant for the business: Don Zibell, . of Boulay, Heutmaker, Zibell & Company, Edina, Mn. b. Legal counsel for the business Dorsey & Whitney c. Corporate counsel: Dorsey & Whitney 9. WHAT IS YOUR TARGET DATE FOR: a. Construction start October 1,'1982 b. Construction completion: April 15, 1983 Chayton Corporation, for Emerald Inn of Maplewood Name f 'Appl i cant 6 / , Utz , Signature of Authori ed Representative S 4 ticc.1ieeh av r , Title 6 - 3 the following items must be submitted with this application to the Community Development l Department: 1. A $500.00 filing fee 2. A resolution setting a hearing date 3. An application to the Commissioner of Securities for approval of Municipal Industrial Revenue Bond project If you have any questions on items 2 or 3, call the City Clerk, Lucille Aurelius, 770 -4500 IL 1 ZD' 40 ` mo OL Z051 91 - • 282_7• F 1 !.4- -- - 30 L j 9 ,4 S tap r4 i 5 ? .2 N r — 1 r • ` ` C.. is vp ro s..•k.,, 074 c L } M 1 fca•a. • ... '. Z 2mac. z '' W.RLOvd5O4 OF S 05 r j ' L s i G r- A M E x E 3 •4,".E'x Eo4E,C Fp N .4.rsEXE D Ts A'f.• /' r R , L . ti vE X E t,o M.r.cE.woo e V r•. .y,.r. ra*! e w,v EA .7-o rJ 'A.la' woo o ,n C , jar.. . , 9 7 .,* t E weo ' T i ntFw oop tQ; PGt't•'^c ... ..L. - • >s , t , t 22_2_2._ ' - 111i r _ 3 C3. , t '' , 2222 '., f • -9 • ,' • 22,22 -- : ? " . '3........ • -'r ' x23 6 !' `. •- • - - _t1. 89' 3a• oS W. "2 . ' - a• f i ;aa. t S8'' : b2.. • 7s - - 75 • • sa.3•v • ;3' :s•r.as 2G3 ` 3 42 dt i r s!,d' , . Z.c. [` '.•. - ' 2222. 2222_ ... - 2222. . 4 3,2 22.22. •'.:. ,,,.._..::. ,:;.:.. 3 bow- • 31'! ' 1.48ac. 3.07 ztc 5A; 10 ;s c. - CID 7 7 ac_ 3.81 ac. Q o i p n ! 40 4-A-040 mc, . -, 19 030 +t 1 80 pl0 r 5 i • ax, 1i C- 3 4 0. S} 3x3.9• -• 1zo :, • ae r tA ci - 3 O 9 = ab N •} M t1t 2222 1— •• 0? 308.62• d. 0i1 Pi Lim 0 sue'- O 1 tl . • 3 • f- Ib t S t Q i - - - - -- .. 22:22 ._.- '1__.._... }- -_ 1 .c, -- •-- --•-•- - . _. - --±- - ._._ _2_222 . t,; _ 2222 _ ! 1 n r / r / t' r ' •• 't :. . Yi . ,ice rti .• : a i h j,kYr •I++:' t \ ` 1 ' / ! + l r :1 ``'• 4 ".\ ` \ t` • L , ( / / ! ' i• / \ ' - ' t • ,L•" • " A , J \ ', I ILI `. , ., . • . I 1 y J .• ' J . •S, 1 ti •' \ 1 1 i7J` '. _i ' ; r . .! • r .7A' a 4•, /.. • j Rf / v ' a-. ....a , \ , d i.e L •J M•t.• w. ., ' • _ w ! — r • ,d1, a ' .• . f ,, 1'4 •. ` _-, t ,!' 0 / r / .1 t .. i'• , ~ tl _ •j.: -•,'' •r.. • i / } ' 1f' , «. .r '. Y. { ` r _ 4. r t.I / f Y r.+ , •i• ', ... ' - •. % "i. 4 ' !. `t t t +- yt.': .•. c'' + j .r 111 ,. } / ? • f 1I ' . r , . i / ' a • , .` ••' ` '' , '+, r "` + • w •••• . . • II11" ! 1 1 ±j, 4 , / I' / t ` ; 1 .• 1 , ,11 . j+w •+ "^1r` ' r r .. .... .. i d 1 t i ' 1. , •t, ( ?. , i . '' a .. t ;. +'.' ;, ! R • r• .' tr 1 'f, •. t f ' , r . ~ , ti • ^, a -` . {" ',,' . r • •.. ,. ,••' i yI {, ; •.I.* ' y., I.; .' • .'. i...,.. ' V ' .. ' r aa + / , t. ' a•'Sat _ ' 1 'ti L lf, .,1. tF . '•, +. . r / +` Ii,,.. F • ).` t i ..` ,.''.Tf7•l. ,.`1, , f , i. • \ l•t j• ' ' r ' fi =, i ; • t e " r . t , .. • 1 f1lrw:. h ..l ... .. . :f j!, :' .ivl • ` 1 .I• * Rr M f, . • l •« •... L ifs ' ,ti ` ,,/ t , 4 • jl r • F wt . 4'^I 1 1.,rt,± • t q "u / +"r R' •' •• .i . , ;Y.• , y 4: r l I /ice, it •,, 1y l i; . 1 t ' r } i ,, •R'n A.w. t l."1 " r tiC (Ni• •, ••• t?. r . w k. , `• i^! j fir.-- ;'+!R'!, yaa , _T!e••jt b'• • ;r , Tr/ a t ' 7t M ',/, i .` a1 .. a: • t - -! t . f • ,t • a .` f' • • f s ! R JA Kz L •fir .' .1. it +t7' i r . 4 ', _ ' , s w= :f._.. 'J • t ..•.. _:,w!... • , JLj, / 7 y w• ,r' r a. ... ..nom' OF NVN fto fitrT AP 14 t 17 . ,a,f' ••!` : 1r .',' 3 i • • • -r. t "t' y,. , • t • t . r ``- • 1 l 1j 1, r j ,. , ` , r l + 1 it lit Y ir'„raa - _ " :' `` ; i I ; . r4'r`I 1',` ' ) , • ,l i / , , ws'•• ./ l\ >, " \' 1 ' i.. f t:l - •.? : : •.. , : /I } '. '. y , r.. : • `'e j tip. '.'. ' . f '' . ~ ••. • • ` ti . ... ' . ` .' t = ^ rYr 1 ' , 1 y , ... ' ` w s r" .. - v • . _ I • f ; i ' w { 1: h • r .. - -.. -' i J. , ,,,,, ,,. , :7"r. v • e •', i 't'l • a ",i { w'' .. " yat r I fit ''!t+ ell. ' '/ t ``,? ry ' /'` 1 a , 1, ` 1 , ya r ' r 'f '' , ' A 1 \ ``• > , y ff ` • I • , ; • Pt r k tir jj Northridge Emerald Inn 1125 Red Fox Road Arden Hills, MN 551 Phone 612/484-6557 After over 40 years of travel all over the world, I always look for lodging that meets my three "C" test; Clean, Comfortable and Courteous. The Emerald Inn rates very high in each category, Plus, it's convenient, it's economical and QUIET, which after a hectic business day I appreciate." S.H. Fischer, Control Data Corporation The Emerald is a quiet, clean Inn where the traveler is treated in a friendly manner. It is adjacent to I -694 providing good access to the Minneapolis or St Paul business districts. Room rates are reasonable and the rooms are attractively furnished. I heartily recommend this Inn to all travelers." Charles Lyons, Land O' Lakes I have stayed at rooms ranging two to three times the cost of Emerald Inn's rooms. These more expensive rooms have been smaller, older, and not as clean as at the Emerald Inn. I wasn't paying for just a room; I was paying for a grand lobby, a swimming pool, and Other recreational facili- ties - none of which I would use and enjoy. I'm a businessman, and I use a motel for bed and bath, not for a vacation resort. If someone has the same needs and wants, I would highly recommend the Emerald Inn." Paul Skrip, Trane sentinel My reason for staying at the Northridge Emerald Inn? Quiet, clean rooms. Polite personnel. Location is close to our home office. And, their rates are the most reasonable I've found." Wes Oppegard, R.L. Gould Co. Our family's stay at the Emerald Inn for three months was lovely. The warmth and total cooperation we received from all the staff, including the owner, was so appreciated. We will never forget how accommodating everyone was during our troubled times. The "extras" the Emerald offers made it seem like home - free coffee all day and night, free ice, color television, and not to forget our rooms were kept immaculate. All I can say is, when it was time to leave, my son did not want to go, and neither did I! Our family has no question regarding where we would recommend other family members and friends to stay but at the Emerald Inn." Mr. & Mrs. Jim Kooy & Ricky home damaged by 1981 tornado) 0 FINAL NOTE RESOLUTION CITY OF MAPLEWOOD' 1,100 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE NOTE OF 1982 EMERALD INN OF MAPLE4VOOD PROJECT) Adopted:f 1982 The cover sheet and this table . of contents are not a part of the attached. Resolution, but are included by Bond Counsel for convenience only.) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ARTICLE ONE -DEFINITIONS, LEGAL AUTHORIZATION AND FINDINGS ..............1............1 Section 1 -1.Definitions .....••••• *••• *•••1 Section 1 -2.Legal Authorization.......... • 0 . •3 Section 1-3.Finding.s .........................3= Section 1-4.Authorization and Ratification ofProject . ......................5 ARTICLE TWO -NOTE 6 Section 2-1*Authorized Amount and Form ofNote ..........................6 Section 2 -2.The Note ..............•••••••••••1 Section 2 -3.Ex eeution............••&•••••o•••17 Section 2 -4.Delivery of Note......••••••••••17 Section 2-5.Deposition of Note Proceeds ......18 Section 2-60 Registration of Transfer* 0 0 0 0 .. • .18 Section 2-7.Mut i 1 ated , Lost or Destroyed Note.............................19 Section 2 -8.Ownership of Note 9 0 0 . 9 94.06.. 0 • * •19 ARTICLE THREE - PREPAYMENT OF NOTE BEFORE MATURITY...20 Section 3 -1,Prepayment ........•••••• **0•00000 20 ARTICLE FOUR GENERAL COVENANTS......•••.•• go* ••••••21 Section 4 -1.Payment of Principal and Interest .........................21 Section 4 -20 Performance of and Authority forCovenants..6.900.900*1•0696964 21 Section 4-39 Performance of Covenants* 0 0 0 6 . . . .21 Section 4 -49 Nature of Security . 0 0 0. 0 0.00. 0. 0 0 22 ARTICLE FINE MISCELLANEOUS .........•.• *••O••• *00000 23 Section 5 -1.Severability .......••••••*•••• *•0 23 Section 5 -2.Authentication of Transcript. 0 0 6 0 23 Section 5-3o Registration of Re solution .......23 Section 5 -4.Authorization to Execute Agreements .......................23 SI GNAT U RE S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 NOTE RESOLUTION RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, as follows: ARTICLE ONE DEFINITIONS, LEGAL AUTHORIZATION AND FINDINGS 1 -1. Definitions . The terms used herein, unless the context hereof shall require otherwise shall have the following meanings, and any other terms defined in the Loan Agreement shall have the same meanings when used herein as assigned to them in the Loan Agreement unless the context or use thereof indicates another or different meaning or intents Act the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, as amended; Assignment of Rents and Leases the agreement to be executed by the Borrower assigning all the rents, issues, profits and leases derived from the Project to the Lender to secure the repayment of the Note and interest thereon; Bond Counsel the firm of Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, of St. Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota, or any other firm of nationally recognized bond counsel, and any opinionpon of Bond Counsel shall be a written opinion signed by such Bond Counsel; Borrower Emerald Inn of Maplewood, a Minnesota general partnership, its successors, assigns, and any surviving, resulting or transferee business entity which may assume its obligations under the Loan Agreement; Cam the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, its successors 6 and assigns; Construction Fund the fund established by the City pursuant to this Resolution and into the Proceeds Account of the Construction Fund the proceeds of the Note will be deposited; Construction Loan Agreement the agreement to be executed b y thCity., the Borrower and the Lender, relating to the di s- bursement and payment of Project Costs for the acquisition, construction and installation of the Project; Guarantors [to come] Guaranty collectively, the guaranties of the payment of, among other things, the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Note to be executed by the Guarantors as of the date of this Agreement; Improvements the structures and other improvements, including any tangible personal property, to be constructed or installed by the, Borrower on the .Land in accordance with the Plans and Specifications; Land: the real property and any other easements and rightsdescribed in Exhibit A attached to the Loan Agreement; Lender First National Bank of Minneapolis, in Minneapolis, Minnesota, its successors and assigns; Loan Agreement the agreement to be executed by the City and the Borrower, providing for the issuance of the Note and the loan of the proceeds thereof to the Borrower, including any amendments or supplements thereto made in accordance with its provisions; Mortgage the Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Financing Statement between the Borrower as mortgagor, to the Lender, as mortgagee, securing payment of the Note and interest thereon including any mortgage supplemental thereto entered into in accordance with the provisions thereof; Note.* the $1,100,000 Commercial Development Revenue Note of 1982, (Emerald Inn of Maplewood Project) to be issued by the City pursuant to this Resolution; Note Register the records kept by the City Clerk to provide for the registration of transfer of ownership of the Note; 2 Plans and Specifications the plans and specifications rrr.r i for the construction and installation of the Improvements on the Land, which are approved by the Lender, together with such modifications thereof and additions thereto as are reasonably determined by the Borrower to be necessary or desirable for the completion of the Improvements and are approved by the Lender; pledge Agreement the agreement to be executed by the City and the Lender pledging and assigning the Loan Agreement to the Lender; Principal Balance so much of the principal sum on the Note as remains unpaid at any time; Project the Land and Improvements as they may at any time exist; Project Costs the total of all Loan and Carrying Charges., is as those Loan Agreement; Resolution this Resolution of 44 , 1982, authorizing the issuance of any supplement or amendment thereto. Construction Costs" and terms are de f ined in the y u the City adopted Septemb e the Note, together with All references in this instrument to designated Articles," "Sections" and other subdivisions are to. the desig- nated Articles, Sections and subdivisions of this resolution as orlginally adopted . The words .herein, " "hereof" and "hereund- er" and other words of similar import refer to this Resolution as a whole not to any particular Article, Section or subdivis- ion. 1 -2. Legal Authorization. The City is a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota and is authorized under the Act to initiate the revenue producing project herein referred to, and to issue and sell the Note for the purpose, in the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Act and in this Resolution. 1 -3. Findings The City Council has heretofore determined, and does hereby determine, as follows: t 1) The City is authorized by the Act to enter into a Loan Agreement for the public purposes expressed in the Act; 3 2) The City has made the necessary arrangements with the Borrower for the establishment within the City of a Project consisting of certain property all as more fully described in the Loan.Agreement and which will be of the character and accomplish the purposes provided by the Act, and the City has by this Resolution authorized the Project and the execution of the Loan Agreement, the Pledge Agreement, the Note and the Construction Loan Agreement, which documents specify certain terms and conditions of the acquisition and financing the Project; 3) in authorizing the Project the City's purpose is, and in its judgment the effect thereof will be, to promote the pub- lic welfare by: the promotion of tourism in the state, the attraction, encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce so as to prevent, so far as possible, ; the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; the development of revenue - producing enterprises to use the available resources of the community, in order to retain the benefit of the community's existing investment in educational and public service facilities; the halting of the movement of talented, educated personnel of all ages to other areas and thus preserving the economic and human resources needed as a base for providing governmental services and facil- ities ; the provision of accessible employment opportunities for residents in the area; the expansion of an adequate tax base to finance the increase in the amount and cost of governmental services, including educational services for the school district serving the community in which the Project is situated; 4) the amount estimated to be necessary to partially finance the Project Costs, including the costs and estimated costs permitted by Section 474.05 of the Act, will require the issuance of the Note in the aggregate principal amount of 1,100,000 as hereinafter provided; 5) it is desirable, feasible and consistent with the objects and purposes of the Act to issue the Note, for the purpose of financing the Project; 6) the Note and the interest accruing thereon do not constitute an indebtedness of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation and do not consti- tute or give rise to a pecuniary liability or a charge against the general credit or taxing powers of the City and neither the full faith and credit nor the taxing powers of the City are pledged for the payment of the Note or interest thereon; and 0 7) the Note is an industrial development bond within the meanie of Section 103(b) of the Internal Revenue Code and is g ion provided under, subparagraphtobeissuedwithintheexemptpgraph of Section 103 (b) (6) of the Code with respect to an issue of $10, 000, 000 or less ; ( D) provided that nothing herein . shall prevent the City from hereafter qualifying the Note under a different exemption if, and to the extent, such exemption is permitted by law and consistent with the objects and purposes of the Project. 1 -4. Authorization and Ratification of Project. The City has heretofore and does hereby authorize the Borrower.,in accordance with the provisions of Section 474.03 (7) of the Act and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Construction Loan Agreement, to provide for the acquisition, construction and installation of the Project by such means as shall be available to the Borrower and in the manner determined by the Borrower, and without advertisement for bids as may be required for the construction and acqui s i - tion of municipal facilities; and the City hereby ratifies, affirms, and approves all actions heretofore taken by the Borrower consistent with and in anticipation of such authority and in compliance with the Plans and Specifications. 5 ARTICLE TWO NOTE 2-1. Authorized Amount and Form of Note., The Note issued pursuant to this Resolution shall be in substantiall the form set forth herein, with such appropri- ate variations, omissions and insertions as are permitted or re b this Resolution, and in accorda with the further provisions hereof; and the total principal amount of the Note that ma be outstandin hereunder is expressl limited to 1,100,000 unless a duplicate Note is issued pursuant to Sec- tion 2-6. The Note shall be in substantiall the followin form: 100 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Commercial Development Revenue Note of 1982 Emerald Inn of Maplewood Project) 1,100,000 FOR VALUE RECEIVED the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, Rams County Minnesota (the "City ") , hereby promises to pay to the order of First National Bank of Minneapolis (the "Lender ) , its successors or registered assigns (the Lender and any such z s g successor or registered assignee being also sometimes here inafter referred to as the "Holder ") , from the source and in the manner hereinafter provided, the principal sum of ONE MILLION ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,100,000) or so much thereof as remains unpaid from time to time (the "Principal Balance"), with interest thereon at the rate specified in parag and 1(b) hereof (the Tax Exempt Rate") or at phs 1 ( a ahigherrte as provided in paragraph 1(c) hereof (thesuchgp Taxable Rate"), in any coin or currency which at the time or times of payment \ is legal tender for the payment of public or private debts in the United States of America, in accordance with the terms hereinafter set forth. 1. (a) From and a f ter the date hereof through and including PludinSeptember 1, 1983, interest only shall be paid at the rate of % per annum. Interest shall accrue from the date hereof and all be payable on the f it st day of the calendar month next succeeding the date hereof and on the first day of each and every month thereafter through and including September 1, 1983e b) Commencing on October 1, 1983 and on the first day of each calendar month thereafter, the Principal Balance shall be amortized in equal consecutive monthly insinstallments of principal and interest the amount of each of which is to be calculated on an assumed thirty -yeas amortization with interest from September 1, 1983 at the rate per annum and a final installment on September 1 2012 f " Final p be ( Final Maturity Date") which shall equal to the unpaidq Principal Balance and accrued interest thereon. Any payment shall be applied first to accrued interest and thereafter to reduction of the Principal Balance. VA c) (i } In the event that the interest on t1lis Note shall become subject to federal income taxation pursuant to a Determination of Taxability (as hereinafter defined) , the interest rate on this Note shall be increased, retroactively effective from and after the Date of Taxability (as hereinafter defined) to % per annum (the "Taxable Rate ") . The City shall immediately upon demand pay to the Holder and to each prior Holder affected by such Determination of Taxability an amount equal to the amount by which the interest accrued retroactively at such increased rate from the Date of Taxability to the date of payment exceeds the amount of interest actually accrued and paid to the Holder and any such prior Holder during said period. (Such obligation of the City shall survive the payment in full. of the principal amount of this Note) . Commencing on the first day of the month next following the date of payment of such additional interest and continuing on the first day of each month thereafter (unless the Holder shall accelerate the maturity of the Note pursuant to clause (ii) of this paragraph (c)) , this Note shall be payable as follows: A) if amortization of the Principal Balance had not theretofore commenced under paragraph (b) hereof, the monthly payments of interest only hereunder shall be increased to reflect the accrual of interest at the Taxable Rate and the monthly installments of principal and interest payable scommencing with the October 11 1983 payment shall be recomputed on the basis of the Taxable Rate on an assumed thirty year amortization; or B) if amortization of the Principal Balance had theretofore commenced under paragraph b) hereof, the monthly installments of principal and interest payable commencing with the next succeeding payment shall be recomputed on the basis of the , Taxable Rate and amortization over the remaining portion of the original assumed amortization* ii)Upon a Determination of Taxability, the Holder may declare the entire Principal Balance of this Notey ' retroactivelytogetherwithaccruedinterestthereonatsuchrey increased Taxable Rate to be immediately due and payable plus the prepayment premium, calculated in accordance with paragraph 8 hereof. iii) The Holder shall give notice, as soon as practicable, to the Borrower of any Notice of Taxability, as hereinafter defined, received by the Holder and permit the Borrower to contest, litigate or appeal the same at its sole expense; provided that any such contest, litigation or appeal is, in the reasonable opinion of the Holder, being undertaken and carried forward in good faith, diligently and with reason-- able dispatch. In the event any such contest, litigation or appeal is undertaken, the increased interest provided in paragraph (b)(i) shall, nevertheless, be payable to the Holder and shall be held by the Holder in escrow (without paying interest thereon) pending final disposition of such conte st , litigation or appeal, provided that the Borrower shall indemnify and hold harmless the Holder and each prior Holder from any and all penalties, interest or other liabilities which they may incur on account of such contest, litigation or appeal. iv) The terms "Determination of Taxability, 11 Date of Taxability" and "Notice of Taxability" shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Loan Agreement, dated the date hereof (the Loan Agreement ") , between the City and Tanners Lake Partners (the "Borrower "). 2. In any event, the payments hereunder shall be sufficient to pay all principal and interest due, as such principal and interest becomes due, and to pay any premium or penalty., at maturity, upon redemption, or otherwise. Interest shall be computed on the basis of a 360 day year, but charged for the actual number of days elapsed. 3. Principal and interest and any premium due hereunder shall be payable at the principal office of the Lender, or at such other place as the Holder may designate in writing. 4. This Note is issued by the City to provide funds for a Project, as defined in Section 474.02, Subdivisions lb, Minnesota Statutes, consisting of the acquisition, construction and equipping of an Emerald Inn Motel, pursuant to the Loan Agreement, and this Note is further issued pursuant to and in full compliance with the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, particularly Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, and pursuant to a resolution of the City Council duly adopted on September 13, 1982 (the "Resolution ") . W 5. This Note is secured by a Pledge Agreement of even date herewith by the City to the Lender (the "Pledge Agreement ") , a Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Financing Statement, of even date herewith between the Borrower as mortgagor, and the Lender as mortgagee (the Mortgage ") by an Assignment of Rents and Leases, of even date herewith, from the Borrower to the Lender (the "Assignment of Rents and Leases ") and Guaranties from [to come3 to the Lender collectively, the "Guaranty"). The proceeds of this Note shall be placed in the Proceeds Account of the Construction Fund established pursuant to the Resolution and the Construction Loan Agreement (hereinafter referred to) and disbursement of the proceeds of this Note from the Construction Fund is subject to the terms and conditions of a Construction Loan Agreement of even date herewith among the Lender, the City and the Borrower (the "Construction Loan Agreement ") . 6. The Holder may extend the times of payments of interest and /or principal of or any penalty or premium due on this Note, including the date of the Final Maturity Date, to the extent permitted by law, without notice to or consent of any party liable hereon and without releasing any such party. However, in no event may the Final Maturity Date be extended beyond thirty (30) years from the date hereof 4i 7. The Borrower may prepay the Principal Balance in whole or in part in increments of $100,000 on the first day of any month upon at least 30 days advance written notice to the Holder (or such lesser period of notice as the Holder may approve) and upon payment of an amount equal to the principal amount being so prepaid, plus accrued interest hereon to the date of prepayment, plus the prepayment premium calculated in accordance with paragraph 8 hereof. This Note is also subject to mandatory prepayment in whole or in part pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Construction Loan Agreement in the amount of any sums theremainiomlNngg , ion in the Proceeds Account of the Construction Fund at C p Date (as such terms are defined in the Construction Loan Agreement) , in which event a pre, payment premium shall also be payable in accordance with paragraph 8 hereof, and the time of such prepayment may not be extended pursuant to paragraph 6 hereof. Upon the occurrence of certain Events of Default" under the Construction Loan Agreement, the Loan Agreement and /or under the Mortgage, and as provided in 10 paragraph 12 hereof,. the Holder may declare the Principal Balance and accrued interest on this Note to be immediately due and payable (any such action and any similar action pursuant to paragraph 1(c) (ii) hereof being hereinafter referred to as an acceleration" of this Note) , in which event a prepayment premium shall also be payable in accordance with paragraph 8 hereof. Upon the occurrence of certain events of damage, destruction or condemnation, the Holder may, as provided in the Mortgage, apply the net proceeds of any insurance or condem- nation award to the prepayment, in whole or in part, of the Principal Balance in which event a prepayment premium may be payable in accordance with paragraph 8 hereof* This Note may be called for redemption and prepayment, in whole, at the option of the Holder, on October i 1992 (or at any time within six months following October 1, 1992) , on October 1, 1997, on September 1, 2002 and on October 1 2007, (the "Call Dates ") , upon at least thirty (30) days advance written notice to the Borrower (or such lesser period of notice as the Borrower may approve) . The Borrower has the right under this Note on any Call Date of which the Holder has given the required notice, in lieu of redemption of this Note, upon five (5) days advance written notice prior to such Call Date, to purchase the Note from the Holder or give notice to the Holder that it has secured a purchaser for the Note ,§ The Holder agrees, in lieu of redemption of this Note to sell the Note to the Borrower or such purchaser on such Call Date at a purchase price equal to the Principal Balance and accrued interest. 8. (a) If at the time of any prepayment on or prior to October 1, 1987 or acceleration of this Note occurring prior to October 1, 1987, the Borrower shall pay, together with the premium, if any, set forth in paragraph (b) hereof, an amount equal to 1-1/2% of the amount of principal so prepaid. Not- withstandingg the foregoing, no such prepayment premium shall be payable with respect to a prepayment made at the option of the Holder pursuant to Article Five of the Mortgage or Section 5.02 of the Loan Agreement, unless an Event of Default had occurred under the Loan Agreement, Construction Loan Agreement or the mortgagee and remains uncured at the time such prepayment is9 made. 11 J r b) If at the time of any prepayment/or acceleration of this Note, occurring prior to 1, 1992 the yield on U.S. Treasury securities (as published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York) having a maturity date closest to October 1, 1992. (the "Government Yield ") , as determined by the Holder as of the date of prepayment or acceleration, is less than t the Borrower shall pay a premium calculated. as follows: (a) the amount of principal so prepaid shall be multiplied by (i) the amount by which % exceeds the Government Yield as of the date of prepayment or acceleration, times (ii) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days remaining to October 1, 1992 and the denominator of which is 360, (b) the resulting product shall then be divided by the number of whole months then remaining to October 1, 1992 yielding a quotient (the "Quotient "), (c) the amount of the prepayment premium payable-under this paragraph shall be the present value on the date of prepayment or acceleration (using the Government Yield as of the date of prepayment or acceleration as the discount factor) of a stream of equal monthly payments in number equal to the number of whole months remaining to October 1, 1992, with the amount of each such hypothetical monthly payment equal to the Quotient and with the first payment payable on the date of prepayment or acceleration. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no such prepayment premium shall be payable with respect to a prepayment made at the option of the Holder pursuant to paragraph 1(c) (ii) hereof or pursuant to Article Five of the Mortgage or Section 5.02 of the Loan Agreement unless an Event of Default had occurred under the Loan Agreement, Construction Loan Agreement, or the Mortgage and remains uncured at the time such prepayment is made. 9. The payments due under paragraph 1 hereof shall continue to be due and payable in full until the entire Principal Balance and accrued interest due on this Note have been paid regardless of any partial prepayment made hereunder. 10. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Note is transfer- able upon the books of the City at the office of the City Manager by the Holder in person or by his agent duly authorized in writing, at the Holder's expense, upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the City Clerk duly executed by the Holder or his duly authorized agent* Upon such transfer the City Clerk will note the date of registration and the name and address of the new registered Holder in the registration blank appearing below. 12 The City may deem and treat the person in whose name the Note is last registered upon the books of the City with such registration noted on the Note, as the absolute owner hereof, whether or not overdue, for the purpose of receiving payment of or on the account of the Principal Balance, redemption price or interest and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to the Holder or upon his order shall be valid and effective to satisfy and discharge the liability upon the Note to the extent of the sum or sums so paid, and the City shall not be affected by any notice to the contrary* 11. This Note and interest hereon and any premium due hereunder are payable solely from the revenues and proceeds under the Loan Agreement pledged to the payment thereof pursuant to the Pledge Agreement, except as the same may otherwise be payable in accordance with, the Mortgage, the Guaranty and the Assignment of Rents and Leases, and do not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation, are not payable from or a charge upon any funds other than the revenues and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, and do not give rise to a pecuniary liability of the City or, to the extent permitted by law, of any of its officers, agents or employees, and no holder of this Note shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay this Note or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City, and this Note does not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City, and the agreement of the City to perform or cause the performance of the covenants and other provisions herein referred to shall be subject at all times to the availability of revenues or other funds furnished for such purpose in accordance with the Loan Agreement, sufficient to pay all costs of such performance or the enforcement thereof . 12. It is agreed that time is of the essence of this Note . If the City defaults in the payment when due of any installment of principal or interest or any premium or penalty due hereunder and if said default shall have continued for a period of five (5) days, or if an Event of Default shall occur as set forth in the Mortgage, the Construction Loan Agreement or the Loan Agreement, then the Holder shall have the right and option to declare the Principal Balance, and accrued interest thereon, together with the premium, if any, payable under paragraph 8 hereof, immediately due and payable but solely from the sources specified in paragraph 11 hereof. Failure to exercise such option at any time shall not constitute a waiver of the right to exercise the same at any subsequent time. 13 13. The remedies of the Holder, as provided herein and in the Mortgage, the Assignment of Rents and Leases., the Guaranty, the Loan Agreement and the Construction Loan Agreement, are not exclusive and shall be cumulative and concurrent and may be pursued singly, successively or together, at the sole discretion of the Holder, and may be exercised as often as occasion therefor shall occur; and the failure to exercise any such right or remedy shall in no event be construed as a waiver or release thereof. 14. The Holder shall not be deemed, by any act of omission or commission, to have waived any of its rights or remedies hereunder unless such.waiver is in writing and signed by the Holder, and then only to the extent specifically set forth in the writing. A waiver with reference to one event shall not be construed as continuing or as a bar to or waimer of any right or remedy as to a subsequent event. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all condi- tions, acts and things required to exist, happen and be perform- ed precedent to or in the issuance of this Note do exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due form as required by law. 14 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Note to be du1 Y executed in its name by the manual signatures of the Mayor, City Clerk, and has caused the corporate seal to be affixed hereto, and has caused this Note to be dated 1982. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk SEAL) 15 PROVISIONS AS TO REGISTRATION The ownership of th unpaid Princip Balance of this Note and the interest accruin thereon is re on the books of the Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota, in the name of the holder last noted below. Date of Name and address Si of Cit Re Re Owner Clerk First National Bank of Minneapolis First Bank Place East Minneapolis, MN 55480 16 2 -2. The Note. The Note shall be dated as of 'the date of del ivery an P Ydshallbepayable at the times and in the manner, shall bear interest at the rate, and shall be subject to such other terms and conditions as are set forth therein. 2 -3. Execution. The Note shall be executed on behalf of the City by signaturesnatures o f its Mayor, City Clerk and shall be sealedtheg with the seal of the City. In case any officer whose signature appear on the Note shall cease to be. such officer before shall pp nevertheless be the delivery of the Notre, such signature shall neve valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if he had remained in office until delivery. In the event of the absence or disability Ybilitofthe. Mayor or the City Clerk or such officers o f the City i as, in the opinion of the City Attorney, may act n their be ,half shall without further act or authorization of the city Council execute and deliver the Notes 2 -4. Delivery of Note The offer of the Lender to purchase the Note upon the terms recited herein and in the Loan Agreement, at a price equal to the total principal amount of the Note, is found to be reasonable and advantageous to the City and is accepted. B Yeforedeliver of the Note there shall be filed with the Lender the following items: 1) an executed copy of each of the following documents: A) the Loan Agreement; B) the Pledge Agreement; C) the Mortgage; D) the Assignment of Rents and Leases; E) the Construction Loan Agreement; F) the Guaranty; and G) a cost certificate signed by the Borrower certifying the use of the proceeds of the Note. Y g 17 2) an opinion of Counsel for the Borrower in scope and substance satisfactory. to Bond Counsel and Lender as to the authority of the Borrower to enter into the transaction and other related matters; 3) the opinion of Bond Counsel as to the validity and tax exempt status of the Note; 4) such other documents and opinions as Bond Counsel may reasonably require for purposes.of rendering its opinion required in subsection (3) above or that the Lender may require for the closing. 2 -5. Disposition of Note Proceeds There is hereby established with the Lender a Construction Fund to be held by the Title as a separate fund of the City as provided in the Construction Loan Agreement, Upon delivery of the Note, the proceeds of the Note shall be credited to the Proceeds Account of the Construction Fund held by the Lender on behalf of the City, at which time the entire principal amount of the Note shall be deemed advancedW The Lender and or the title insurance company identified in the Construction Loan Agreement shall, on behalf of the City, disburse funds for the payment of Project Costs upon receipt of such supporting documentation as the Lender or such title insurance company may deem reasonably. necessary, including com- pliance with the provisions of the Construction Loan Agreement. The Lender, said title insurance company, or the Borrower shall provide the City upon request, with .a full accounting of all funds disbursed for Project Costs. 2-6. Registration of Transfer The City will cause to be kept at the of f ice of the City Clerk a Note Register in which, subject to such reasonable regulations as it may prescribe, the City shall provide for the registration of transfers of ownership of the Note. The Note shall be transferable upon the Note Register by the Lender in person or by its agent duly authorized in writing, upon surrend- er of the Note together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the City Clerk duly executed by the Lender or its duly authorized agent, Upon such transfer the City Clerk shall note the date of registration and the name and address of the new Lender in the Note Register and in the registration blank appearing on the Note* W 2 -7. Mutilated, Lost or Destroyed Note In case any Note issued hereunder shall become muti- 1 ated or be destroyed or lost , the City shall., if not then prohibited by law, cause to be executed and delivered, a new Note of like outstandin g principal amount, number and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of such mutilated Note, or in lieu of and in substitution for such Note destroyed or lost, upon the Lender's paying the reasonable expenses and charges of the City in connection therewith, and in. the case of a Note destroyed or lost, the filing with the City of evidence satisfactory to the City that such Note was destroyed or lost, and furnishing the City with indemnity satisfactory to it. If the mutilated, destroyed or lost Note has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it shall not be necessary to issue a new Note prior to payment. 2 -8. ownership of Note The City may deem and treat the person in whose name the Note is last registered in the Note Register and by nota- tion on the Note whether or not such Note shall be overdue, as the absolute owner of such Note for the purpose of receiving of or on account of the Principal Balance, redemptionpayment . price or interest and for all other purposes whatsoever, and the City shall not be affected by any notice to the contrary 19 ARTICLE THREE PREPAYMENT OF NOTE BEFORE MATURITY 3 -1. Prepayment The Note may be prepaid in accordance with the provi- siotis of the Note. W ARTICLE FOUR GENERAL COVENANTS 4 -1. Payment of Principal and Interest The City covenants that it will promptly pay or cause to be paid the principal of and interest on the Note at the place, on the dates, from the source and in the manner provided herein and in the Note. The principal and interest are payable solely from and secured by revenues and proceeds derived from the Loan Agreement, the Pledge Agreement, the Mortgage, the Construction Loan Agreement the Guaranty and the Assignment of Rents and Leases, which revenues and proceeds are hereby specifically pledged to the payment thereof in the manner andpY to the extent specified in the Note, the Loan Agreement, the Pledge Agreement, the Construction Loan Agreement, the Guaranty, the Mortgage and the Assignment of Rents and Leases; and nothing in the Note or in this Resolution shall be considered as assigning, pledging or otherwise encumbering any other funds or assets of the City. 4 -2 Performance of and Authority for Covenants* The City covenants that it will faithfully perform at all times an and all of its covenants, undertakings, ngs , stipul a- tions and provisions contained in this Resolution, in the Note executed, authenticated and delivered hereunder and in all proceedings of the City Council pertaining thereto; that it is duly authorized under the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota _including particularly and without limitation the Act, to issue the Note authorized hereby, pledge the revenues and assign the Loan Agreement in the manner and to the extent set forth in this Resolution, the Note and the Loan Agreement and Pledge Agreement; that all action on its part for the issuance of the Note and for the execution and delivery thereof has been duly and effectively taken; and that the Note in the hands of the Lender is and will be a valid and enforceable obligation of the City according to the terms thereof* 4 -3. Performance of Covenants The City agrees to enforce all covenants and obligations of the Borrower under the Loan Agreement and Construction Loan Agreement, and to perform all covenants and 21 other provisions pertaining to the City contained in the Note, the Loan Agreement and the Construction Loan Agreement and subject to Section 4-4* 4 -4. Nature of Security Notwithstanding anything contained in the Note, the Mortgage, the Assignment of Rents and Leases, the Loan Agree- ment the Pledge Agreement or any other document referred to in Section 2--4 to the contrary, under the provisions . of the Act the Note may not be payable from or be a charge upon any funds of the City other than the revenues and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof , nor shall the City be subject to any liability thereon, nor shall the Note otherwise contribute or give rise to a pecuniary liability of the City or, to the extent permitted by law, any of the City's officers, employees and agents . No holder of the Note shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the Note or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City; and the Note shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City and the Note shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation; but nothing in the Act impairs the rights of the Lender to enforce the covenants made for the security thereof as provided in this Resolution, the Loan Agreement, the Pledge Agreement, the Mortgage, the Assignment of Rents and Leases, the Construction Loan Agreement, the Guaranty and the Act, and by authority of the Act the City has made the covenants and agreements herein for the benefit of the Lender; provided that in any event, the agreement of the City to perform the covenants and other provisions contained in the Note, the Loan Agreement, the Pledge Agreement and the Construction Loan Agreement shall be subject at all times to the availability of revenues under the Loan Agreement sufficient to pay all costs of such performance, and the City shall not be subject to any personal or pecuniary liability thereon. 22 ARTICLE FIVE MISCELLANEOUS 5 -1. Severabili . If any provision of this Resolution shall be held or deemed to be or shall , in fact, be inoperative or unenforceable as applied in an articular case in any jurisdiction or juris- dictions or in all jurisdictions or in all cases because it conflicts Yctswithan provisions of.any constitution or statute or rule or P ublic policy, or for any other reason, such circum- i stances shall not have the effect of rendering the provision n question inoperative or unenforceable in any other case or circumstance, or of rendering any other provision or provisions herein contained invalid, inoperative, or unenforceable to. any extent whatever. The invalidity of any one or more phrases, nces clauses or paragraphs in tPsentehis Resolution contained shall not affect the remaining portion s of this Resolution or any part thereof* 5 -2. Authentication of Transcript. The officers of the City are directed to furnish to Bond Counsel certified copies of this Resolution and all docu- ments referred to herein, and affidavits or certificates as to all other matters which are reasonably necessary to evidence the yvalidit of the Note* All such certified copies, certif i- cater and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute recitals of the City as to the correctness of all statements contained therein. 5 -3. Registration of Resolution. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a copy of this Resolution to be filed with the County Auditor of Ramse y YCount , ' and to obtain from said County Auditor a cer ti f icate that the Note as a bond of the City has been duly entered upon his bond register. 5 -4. Authorization to Execute Agreements. The forms of the proposed Loan Agreement, the Pledge Agreement and the Construction Loan Agreement are hereby approved in substantially the form presented to the City Council, gtogether with such additional details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such modifications thereof, 23 deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be necessary and appropriateroriate and approved by Bond Counsel prior to the execution of the documents. The Mayor and the City Clerk of the City are authorized to execute the Loan Agreement, the Pledge gA reement, and the Construction Loan Agreement in the name of and on behalf of the City and such other documents as Bond Counsel considers appropriate in connection with the issuance of the Notes . In the event of the absence or disability yoroftheMa or City lerk such officers of the CityY as, in the opinion of the City Attorney, may act in their behalf,shall without further act or authorization of the City Council do all things and execute all instruments and documents requiredired to be done or executed by such absent or disabled officers. The execution of any instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the City herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents in accordance with the terms hereof . Adopted:19820 Mayor of the City of Maplewood Attest: City Clerk 24 J t i MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM:Director of Communi Development Action by oa SUBJECT: Rezoning LOCATION: 2669 and 2677 E. 7th St. E-n d or SC, APPLICANT: City of Maplewood`. f - -- OWNERS: William Basler (26.69 E. 7th St.) Robert Basler (2677 E. 7th St.) DATE: August 25, 1982 SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL Re uest Rezone the two lots -from M -1, light manufacturing to R -1, residence district single dwelling ). Proposed Land Use Both lots are occupieded with sin 1 e dwellings . No further development is p 9 proposed. CONCLUSION Comments The cit y initiated this rezoning as part of its "downzoni ng" program. Thi s is where the zoning allows a greater intensity of land use than is proposed by the city 1 and use plan. These two lots were rezoned to M -1 for a small shop at 2669 E. Seventh Street i n 1961. The shop burned and was not replaced. The owner is now in a nursing home. Because of the M -1 zone, the existing homes are non - conforming uses and cannot expand without a special use permit. Rezoning to R -1 would resolve this problem. Recommendation Approval of the enclosed resolution rezoning the two lots from M -1 to R -1. BACKGROUND Site Description Acreage: 1.37 acres Existing land use: two single dwellings Surrounding Land Uses Northerly and Easterly: single dwellings Southerly: Union Cemetery Westerly : Maplewood Nature Center Past Actions 5 -4 -61: Council rezoned the site from R -1 to M -1. Planning gLandUsePlandesignation: RL residential lower density Zoning: M -1 ADMINISTRATIVE Procedure 1. Planning Commission -- recommendation 2. City Council- -1st reading 3. City Council--2nd reading (requires at least four votes for adoption) Enclosures location map property line map Beaver Lake Land Use Plan resolution 2- wi I MONTANA AVE. C cp v H v a i G• r K A RYLA KE RD. W - IvY rvE • Q O O t Trailer Court Q 68 (Private)212 E . MARYLAND V 120 31 AVE _ ST 69 bvE 1.7 RAN Beover M WOLIA AVE Q 01.. LokC ~ ER Q S N W p J =O s$ 69CASE o z KARVESTER o AYE. N ' b32 = W LWEt . BRAND AVE.. 32 `3T. TTH LAVE. z E. 7 T29N BUSH 25 b AVE. R22ri 36 31 R2tW W a < S70> HANA AVE. f %W/ 34 34 E. MAR4A T AVE' 1E. S 7N AVE. J W J J W FREMO NT AV003M cccr Z = W CO R D.ti AVEF 3 M n 68 120 MATCH LINE LOCATION MAP Q N 73 I rj fj iES -' - L c = r - J3BRANDAV 4U L 1 .ie 104? 04C j RL Z ... 2 LLJ Ir p r I U PROPERTY LINE MAP j I 1 I I . oa z Lcr LLJ MAPLEWOOD --1 NATUE CENTER I i mum &K 4U L 1 .ie 104? 04C j RL Z ... 2 LLJ Ir p r I U PROPERTY LINE MAP j I 71 46- Lm RI ooktog> w;; sc 95 SC f u n interchan ri interchan m L k Beaver Lake I maple wood NEIGHGORHOOD LAND USE PLAN W cc sc 94MIJ Rm 19-21 P RESOLUTION NO. COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE _ WHEREAS, a rezoning procedure has been initiated by the city council for a zone change from M -1, light manufacturing to R -1, residence district single dwelling) for the following described property: lots 19 and 20 block 4, Midvale Acres Such above property being also known and numbered as Number 2669 and 26.77 E. Seventh Street, Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning procedure is as follows: 1. That a rezoning procedure has been initiated by the city council, pursuant to Chapter 915 of the Maplewood Code; 2. That said rezoning procedure was referred to and reviewed by the Maplewood City Planning Commission on the 20th day of September, 1982, at which time said Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezone procedure be approved; z 3. That the Maplewood City Council held a public hearing to consider the rezoning procedure, notice thereof having been published and mailed pursuant to law; and 4. That all persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and /or present written statements, and the Council con - sidered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA that the above- described rezoning be granted on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The rezoning is consistent with the Land Use Plan. 2. The property is used for single dwellings,, rather than light manu- facturing. Adopted this ` day of 1982. Mayo r ATTEST: Manager City Clerk I a '44 ONO D. Rezoning: 2669 -and 2677 E. 7th Street Secretary Olson said the proposal is to down zone from M -1 to R-1. The. owners of the property were not present at the meeting. No other commehts were received. Commissioner Fischer mov the Plan Commission recommend to_ the j_ty Council approval of the propose zone chang re for - 266 - 9 - and 2677 E. 7th stre fr M -1 to R - 1. Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes- -Commi ssi oners Axdahl ; Barrett, El l efson,* Fischer, Hejny, Howard, Ki shel , 'Prew, Sletten, Whitcomb. A MEMORANDUM TO City Manager FROM: Associate Pl anner -- Johnson SUBJECT: : Code Amendment: - BC (M) District APPLICANT: City Council DATE: August 30, 1982 INTRODUCTION EndorE~c Dat_ C.. : ..i...w.....- .w.«..r >- tee±-- T,...,t. -..,,. o. .. . Re nest Ame nd the Commercial _ Modified zone to exclude restaurants and BC(M) Business places of amusement, recreation or assembly, other t han a theater. Reasons recreation orientated businesses . Council believes restaurants and . al than is desirable when abutting recr s generate residential nuisance potentialmoretrafficandnutsp uses. Objections h single dwelling residential rict BC (M) zone uses to those compatible wit 1. Rest ( } IL development. than necessary to protect our assessments. 2. Avoid being any more restrictive CONCLUSION Analysis continue to be permitted in the Certainn restaurant and recreation uses should B C(M) zone. would have the appearance of a typical Where a restaurant or recreation facilityity w to i t should be permitted, subject to restrictions office or retail structure, co bi 1 i ty with adjacent residential property. ensure Carlton Racquet Ball Club and Chester's s such as the Europe q Structure an Health Spa, Carl sidential uses than would be a walk - Restaurant are no less compatible with re zone. presentlytheaterormotel., both of which are presen y erm1tted uses in the BC(M) p he ordinance to indicate that restrictions An intent secti should be added to t locati o r t limited to,building height, parking lot may b imposed on,but no lus the newly proposed set- s n of building .entrances. Th restrictions,p usesTocatosetbackwithscreeningfarcommercial back ordinance requiring a fifty -foot se tin residential s * butting uses . adjacent to uses, would ensure compatibility with eliminate ambiguous chusterms, su definition of restaurant should be revised to leThedeand "customarily developed as a. sing as "heavily oriented to the automobile" franchises se terms were intended to prohibit restaurant purpose building. The patrons were served food in their such as the 1960's style A & W restaurants, p automobiles. The resent interpretationon of these terms is to prohibit restaurants with drive-in p ' 980 the Ramsey County District Court felt that order facilities* ' However, i n 1 include most all types . of restaurants being that it was so , the definitnition could Vague. hou d be retained gue. The City attorney recommends that restaurant uses s n the BC(M) gone to support yrttheCity's ' s case to uphold the assessments for Beam Avenue. Recommendation to clarifyf the type of restaurant and Approve the enclosed ordin amendment ,y i ed zoningPpwouldbeprohibitedfrombusinesscommercial -modif 9 recreation uses that wou p districts. 2 REFERENCE INFORMAION Existing Zonin Code Provisio and -laces of amusement, recreation 1. Section 907.050 (2) allows restaurants a • p _ assembly, other than a theater, by special use permit. -or y specificallyl prohibi drive-in restaurants and drive-in Section 907.050 (3) spec y theaters.. drive-in ants as: "restaurants , due to their 3. Section 907.050 (4) definesnes dri ve i n resta ur related activity patterns, or similar factors, as having particular nature, the potential for creating special problems. Restaurants which are heavil a which customarilyefortheircliental , restaurantsorientedtotheautomo designed and con - singlee r ose buildings or buildings physically • g • ew todevelop9 upurposeP particularar revs structed to provide specialized indentification p with existing and proposed uses proper relationship to assure compatibility g area trafficc and access systems, compatibility with the c ommunit 's Compre- hensive Plan and to a , P y void where ossi bl e, problems of potential subsequent use of the property and its improvements." Past Actions zoning code to establish the BC(M)zoning district. 3- 11 -76: Council amended the z 9 nue between created specifically for the area south of Beam Ave , This di stri -ct was c Hazelwood and White Bear Avenues.) The purpose was to allow a wide variety of s that are heavily oriented to the automobile commercial uses, while prohibiting u se and therefore, not compatible with adjacent homes. change from F -Farm residence to BC {P-7 }Business 5- 25 -76: Council approved the zone c g Commercialal - Viodi f i ed, for the property south of Beam Avenue* a special use permit to locate a Pizza Time Theater 8 -20 -8i : Council approved P zoningrestaurantinthe . BC (r) 9 district, south of Beam Avenue (Hirschfield' Building) subject to condi ti ons . specialal use permi in the BC -M zoning 9- 17 -81: a. Council enacted a moratorium on p P districtit for - a period of up to one year or until the Planning Commission makes a recommendation. the 8 -20 -81 special use permit approval for Pizza b. Council. recinded P est for Time Theater. (The applicant had asked that their requ reconsideration be withdrawn.) Lec al for Beam Avenue, the City Attorney recommends Due to pending assessment appeals that o south side further restrict the uses to which property on the tyre City Council not fu • existing restrictions e can be put, but rather specifical define the e g • • of .Beam Avenue P uses ) so as to relieveieve any doubt for ambiguityty as on restaurants and recreation oriented to the e of uses prohibited. ted. Making reference to 'heavilyly •to the type P ons envisioned i n the early automobi 1 e' i s too inclusive. The fast -food operat 1970's are no longer marketed or franchised." 3 - El ADMINISTRATIVE Procedure 1. Planning Commission Recommendation = 2. City Council a. First reading (requires a simple majority for approval) Second reading and final adoption (requires at least four votes for be approval) mb 4 - ORDINANCE N0. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 907 Maplewood Muni cipal Code Relati to Restaurant and Recreation Uses BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF MAPLE4JOOD AS FOLLOWS: Section 7. Section 907.050 is amended to read as follows (language crossed out is to be deleted, language underlined is to be added): 1. INTENT. The BC M) ,Business Commercial-Modified District is untended to provide for the order l transitio between more and low medium densi t resi denti al intensive commercial uses a areas.Restrictions on , but not 1 i mi ted to , building he ht , setbacks lot location, on, or loc of buil norentaton, parking - - entrances ma be re ui red to ensure com ati bi l i ty with abutt in residential uses* i l di n may be erected or used, and a lot 2 . USE REGULATIONS. Abu g Y may be used or occupied, for any of the following purposes, and no other: Retail Store • professionalonal admi ni strati ve offices; bank or a. Ret savings and loan; personal service, craftsmen's sho 9 p, mortuary b. Hotel or motel c. Theater; - walk - }e Walk-in theatre d. Job printing shop e.Bakery or candy shop producing goods for err- -f'efrH-6-& on- premises retail sa ;e- sa_ es • A n y use of the same general character as any of the above f. permitted uses as determined by the City Council, provided that no u s e which is noxious or hazardous shall be permitted. 2 3. The fol l owi nq uses when authori zed by the }awfu ;- geyernueg -belly City Council by means of a special use permit: uses permitted in R -3 ResudeeEe- 14 ti pl e Dwelling Di stri cts, a. All u p . except the construction of dwe4l}eg- houses permitted in 984,R -1 and 905, R -2 districts b. Laundromat or similar automatic self - service Taundry c ,Restaurant where there are no drive-up order windows or serv n of food to patrons i n their automobiles. d. Place of amusement, recreation, or assembly, other than a theater, where there are no outdoor activities. 3- 4. Prohibited uses: a. Drive-in theaters or drive-in restaurants b. Commercial or fee parking lots where such use is the only use of a given parcel or where such use provides for general rather than specific use parking. 4- 5. Definiti a4 Drive -in restaurant. The- £ +ty- £eune}l- hereby - }eds that eertain restaur ants - due- te - the4r- part4ealar- nature; re4 aet patterns s er- s4H41ar- f aetor9 have- the- patent4a4- der- ereat4eg spee pre6;eHis Restauraets- wh4eh- are- heaY4ly -e r4eeted -te- the- a uteffieb4 ;e- fer -the4r e ;4ental restaurants- wh4eh- eusteFflar4 ;y- deve ;ep s ;e purpese - bu } ;dregs er -bu } jd4ngs- phys4ea ;Iy- des} geed- ayd- eeestrue te prei spee 4teet}feat}ee -re acre -part 4 eular - rev }ew - assure eeflipat - w } th - ex49 t4 ng - and- prepesed uses; - peeper- re ;at4eesh4p - te - area traff - and aeeess -s steHis ; - eefpat b}l *ty -w4th- the- ee,ifue}ty= s- £efprebees4ye - Rlapy . and- te- ave4d where pess4ble ,- preb ;efs- ef peteet}a ; subsequent use - ef rethe- erty- and- 4ts- 4fprevefeets. A restaurant with a drive- u orderpp w or serving of food to patrons in their automobiles* Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this day of 5 19 - Mayor ATTEST: Clerk G. Code Amemdment--BC (M) District. i Secretary Olson said the proposal is to amend the BC (MI district to exclude r restaurants and places of amusement, recreation or assembly, other than 'a theater. Chairman Axda hl asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment on the proposal. Norman Anderson, 1 603 Frost Avenue, said when the BC (M) district was established, the prime concern was restaurants abutting residential property. The cooking -odors from restaurants are objectionable to people living by them. He asked if the Com-aission could possibly suggest an amendment that would prohibit restaurants completely from BC (M) districts. The Commission suggested additional restrictions for setbacks, regulations to have restaurants install filtering equipment . Commissioner Whitcomb moved the Pl a nn i ng Commiss recom t the Ci ty_Counci 1 approval_ of the ordinance amendment to clarify the type of re-sta u.rant.4nd_ recreation uses that would be_proh bi ted from Bu Con, nmer_c_i alA Modi fi ed) _ zoni ng _ di_stri cts . s Commissioner Fischer seconded Aves - -Comma ss ioners Axdahi , Barrett, Ellefson, Fischer, Hejny, Howard, Kishel, Prew, Sletten, Whitcomb 9-20-82 4 s t MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager _ FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Planning Fees DATE: October 1, 1982 c ti Re c, c - } Dat e State law requires that planning fees be passed by ordinance. Counci 1 9 ave first reading to fee increases on September 27, except for the Community Design Review Board and electronic games. The Community Design Review Board ordinance is not part of the Zoning Code and, therefore, does not have to be passed by ordinance. Council should, however, establish a fee. Recommendation Approve the enclosed ordinance setting planning application fees and approve a Community Design Review Board fee of $50.00. ic enclosure: Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. PLANNING FEES Section 1. The Zoning Code of the City of Maplewood is hereby amended 'to add Chapter Fees. The following nonrefundable application fees shall be required: Zone Change 125.40 Special Use Permit 125.00 Planned Unit Development 125.00 Special Exception 50.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 125.00 Variances: R -1 35.00 all other districts 75.00 Vacations 40.00 Lot Divisions 25.00 for each lot created Preliminary Plat 5.00 for each lot, with a minimum of $50.00 and a maximum of $175.00 Home Occupation Permit 35.00 for the initial permit and 10.00 for an annual renewal Section 2. Section 818.040 (c) of the sign code is amended as follows: 818.040 (c) . Permit Fees: (1) A sign permit fee (except for billboards) shall be paid in accordance with the following schedule: Square Feet Fee 1 -10 5.00 11 - 25 10.00 26 - 50 20.00 51 - 100 50.00 over 100 100.00 r 2) The fee for. bi 1 l boards shall be $7.00 for the first five square feet, plus 40¢ for each additional square foot. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect after its passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Council on October 4, 19820 Mayor _ Attest: Clerk Ayes-- Nays-- N,2 1EMOR,4NDUM u I TO: _Ci Manager - Director of Community Development SUBJECT: City Council /Planning Commission Study Meeting DATE: October 1, 1982 - The City Council , on September 13, deci ded to set a date on October 7 for a study meeting with the Pl anni ng Commission and Staff to discuss the proposed environmental protection ordinance and the proposed ordinancePP regul setbacks to R -1 zones. Recomme Set a study meeting for Ocrober 21. mb