Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982 06-28 City Council PacketAGENDA Maplewood Ci t Council uncil ;7,:00 P.M. , Monday, June 28, 1982 municipal Administration Building Meeting 82-15 (q) CALL TO ORDER (g) ROLL CALL (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1• Minutes 82 -12 (May 20, 1982) (p) APPROVAL OF AGENDA (E) CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion on these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. I. Accounts Payable 2• Used Car License (McDaniels) 3. Easement Acquisition T.N. 61 4. 1982 Assessment Hearings (F) PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Adolphus St. Assessments (7:00)(Continuation) 2. Cricket Inn - Industrial Revenue Note (7:00) 3. Bodell, Inc. - Hearing - Liquor License Violation (7':15) 4. a) Special Use Permit - Frattalone Excavating, Inc. (7:45) b) Board of Adjustment: Variance - Frattalone Excavating, Inc. (7:45) 5. PUD /PLAT - Adrienne's Addition - (8:15) 6. Mobile Homes in R -1 Zones (8:30) (G) AWARD OF BIDS 1. Insurance (H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Rescinding of Diseased Shade Tree Ordinance rdlnance 2. Plan Update i MINUTES OF MAPL.EWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P,M., Thursday, May 20, 1982 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 82 -12 A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, • p , Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7:01 P.M. ' by Acting Mayor Juker, B. ROLL CALL Frances L. Juker, Acting Mayor Present John C. Greavu, Mayor Absent Norman G.: Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present MaryLee Maida, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL O MINUTES Councilmember Bastian moved to table approval of minutes until after - Item J-13, Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Councilmember Bastian moved to approv the agenda • g a s amended: 1. Trailer House - Kingston and Payne 20 Dead End Designation 3, Maple Knolls 4 Budget 5. City Property 6. Funding for Cat and Dog Fund 7., Williams Pipe Line 8. Metro Council 9. Survey Requirements 10. Don John Property 11, Home Occupation License 120 Post Office Branch 13. Secretary 14. Hotel /Motel Statute 15, Unsafe Building Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Council removed Item E -2 to become Item J -13, Councilmember Anderson moved, seconded b Councilmember • y cilmember Bastian, Ayes - all, too-appro the Consent Agenda Itmes 1, 3 through 9 as r ecommended. -" - l - 5/20 1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part. I - Fees, Services and Expenses Check No. 000420 through Check No. 000458 - $66,448.98; Check No. 013145 through Check No. 013253 - $254,719.13: Part II - Payroll - Check No. 03734 through Check No. 03854 - $90,827.33) in the amount of $411,995.44. 2. Mortgage Revenue Note Criteria See J3. 3. Wire Transfers for Debt Service Payments Approved.authorization to allow wire transfer of all dept service payments. 4. Budget Transfer for Severance Pay Authorized a budget transfer of $15,000 from the Contingency account to cover the current deficit for severance pay and to provide monies for additional severance payments during the balance of the year. 5. Railroad Bridge at County Road D West of Hazelwood Street Resolution no. 82 -5 -54 WHEREAS, County Road "D" from T.H. 61 to Hazelwood Street carries limited traffic; and WHEREAS, the railroad bridge is narrow presenting a less than desirable situation for traffic and is in a visible state of disrepair; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, Ramsey County is requested to make every effort to close the railroad bridge over County Road "D" west of Hazelwood Street to vehicle traffic. b. Lions Club Gambling Permit Approved a temporary gambling permit for the North Maplewood Lions Club to be held June 18, 1982 (The Doris Nelson Benefit), 7. Revenue Note Hearing Date - Cricket, Inc. Resolution No. 82 -5 -55 RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF A NOTICE OF SAID HEARING WHEREAS, (a) Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, known as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (the "Act ") gives municipalities the power to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of the encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to prevent so far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands - 2 - 5/20 and areas of chronic unemployment; (b) The City Council of the City' of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City ") has received from Tanners Lake Partners, a Minnesota general partnership whose partners are Northco Ltd. and Turnpike Properties, Midwest Inc. (the "Company ") a proposal that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter described, through the issuance of its industrial revenue bonds (which may be in the form of a single debt instrument) (the "Bonds ") pursuant to the Act; (c) Before proceeding with consideration of the request of the Company it is P Y necessary for the City to hold a public hearing on the proposal pursuant to Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b, Minnesota Statutes.; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minn- esota, as follows: 1. A Public Hearing on said proposal of the Company will be held at the time and place set forth in the Notice of Hearing hereto attached. 2. The general nature of the proposal and an estimate of the principal amount of bonds to be issued to finance the proposal are described in the form of Notice of Hearing hereto attached. 3. The Notice of said Public Hearing shall be in substantially the form contained in the Notice hereto attached. 4. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Commissioner of Energy, Planning and Development, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together with proposed forms of all attachments and exhibits thereto, is on file in the office of the City Clerk, 5. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of said hearing to be given one publication in the official newspaper and a newspaper of general circu- lation available in the City, not less than 15 days nor more than 30 days prior to the date fixed for said hearing, as shown in the notice of hearing hereto attached. Adopted by the City Council. of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this 20th day of May, 1982. /s/ John C. Greavu Mayor Attest: /s/ Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT To whom it may concern: Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, will meet at the City Hall in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota at 7:00 o'clock p.m. on June 28, 1982, to consider the proposal of Tanners Lake Partners, a Minnesota general partnership whose partners are Northco, Ltd. and Turnpike Properties, Midwest Inc., that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter described by the issuance of 1 3 - 5/20 of industrial development revenue bonds. Description of Project (Including general location) The acquisiton of land located at the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Interstate 94 and Century Avenue in the City of Maplewood and the construction and equipping thereon of a 115 room Cricket Inn Motel. The estimated principal amount of bonds or other obligations to be issued to finance this project is $3,300,000. Said bonds or other obligations if and when issued will not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance upon any property of the City except the project and such bonds or obligations will not be a charge against the City's general credit or taxin powers g p but are payable from sums to be paid by Tanners Lake Partners pubsuant to a revenue Agreement, A draft copy of the proposed application to the Commissioner of Energy, Planning and Development, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, is available for public inspection beginning June 9 1982, from 8:00 o'clock a.m. to 5:00 o'clock p.m., Monday through Friday, at the City Hall in Maplewood. At the time and place fixed for said Public Hearing, the City Council of the City of Maplewood will give all persons who appear at the hearing an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal. Dated this 20th day of May, 1982. (BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL) By /s/ Lucille Aurelius City Clerk 8. Adolphus Street Hearing Date: Project No. 81 -4 Resolution No. 82 -5 -56 WHEREAS, the City Clerk and City Engineer have presented the final figures for the improvement project which consists of the reconstruction of sanitar y sewer trunk facilities and all necessary appurtenances in the following described area: McMenemy Street from Roselawn Avenue to 700 feet to the north; Roselawn Avenue from Adolphus Street to I -35E; Adolphus Street from Roselawn Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPELWOOD, MINNESOTA: that the City Clerk and City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and they shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the City Office for inspection. Further, the Clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. - 4 - 5/20 Resolution No. ' 82 -5 -57 WHEREAS, the Clerk and the Engineer have, at the direction of the Council, prepared an assessment roll for the reconstruction of sanitary sewer trunk facilites and all necessary appurtenances in the following described area: McMenemy Street from Roselawn Avenue to 700 feet to the north; Roselawn Avenue from Adolphus Street to I -35E; Adolphus Street from Roselawn Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue, and the said assessment roll is on file in the office of the City Clerk; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 17th day of June, 1982 at the Gladstone Community Education Center, F rost Avenue and Manton Street, Maplewood, Minnesota at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners of all property affected by the said assessments. 3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time, and place of hearing, the general nature of the improvement, the area proposed to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll is on file with the Clerk, and that written or oral objections will be considered. 9. Liquor Violation: Bodell's (Establish Hearing Date) Established June 28, 1982 as the date for an On Sale Liquor license revocation hearing. J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Kohlman Wetland Acquisition a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to table this item until June 14, 1982 to allow further input by the Count�� Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Special Use Permit: Hazelwood and Beam Avenue - Health Resources, Inc. a. Acting Mayor Juker convened the meeting for a public hearing pertaining to the request of Health Resources, Inc. for a special use permit to construct a 290 bed hospital, related medical offices, an emergency and ambulatory care facility and medical- related housing to be located at the NE corner of Beam Avenue and Hazel- wood Street. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in order and rioted the dates of publication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: 5 - 5/20 "Commissioner Pellish moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council y approval of the special use permit for the new hospital and related medical facilities, based on the findings that: t 1. The proposed hospital use complies with the DC designation of the Land Use Plan, 2. The hospital is an appropriate use in a BC district. 3. The proposed hospital is a needed to serve Maplewood and the adjacent � cent northeasterly suburbs. Approval is for the use only. The site plan and building design must be approved by the Community Design Review Board, PP Commissioner Sletten seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl Barrett, Ellefson, Fischer, Hejny, Howard, Kishel, Pellish, Sletten, Whitcomb." 'd. Mr. Jerry Wilcox, Health Resources, Inc. spoke on behalf of the ro osal. P P e. A representatiave of Brower and Associates, site planners, also spoke on behalf of the proposal. f. Acting Mayor Juker called for proponents and opponents. The followin g asked questions concerning the proposal: Mr. Robert Hajicek, 1700 E. County Road D Mr. S.W. Kincaid, 2004 Hazelwood. g. Acting Mayor Juker closed the public hearing. h. Councilmember Bastian moved to approve the Special Use Permit as request _ by Health Resources, Inc. to construct a 2.90 bed hospital, related medical offices and emergency and ambulatory care facility and medical related housing to be located at the northeast corner of Beam Avenue and Hazelwood Street, based o the followin findings : --- 1. The proposed hospital use complies with the DC designation of the Land Use Plan 2. The hospital is an appropriate use in a BC district 3. The proposed hospital is a needed facility to serve Maplewood and the adjacent northeasterly suburbs. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 2. Alley Vacation: Craig Street to German Street - Myckleby 7 :30 P M y y . a. Acting Mayor Juker convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding he request of Mrs. Ruth Myckleby to vacate the alley r g y g way that extends from Craig Street to German Street. _The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in order and noted the dates of publication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. C* Mrs. Ruth Myckleby, 2227 German Street, the applicant, spoke on behalf of the proposal. - 6 - 5/20 d. Acting Mayor Juker called for proponents. None were heard. e. Acting Mayor Juker called for opponents. None were heard. f. Acting Mayor Juker closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoptio 82 -5 -58 WHEREAS, Ruth Myckleby has initiated - these proceedings to vacate the ublic ert : interest in the following described real property: Alley P P P y y ri ght -of -way, between German and Craig Streets, along the south boundary of the Belisle's First Addition Section 11, Township 29, Range 22 WHEREAS, the procedural history of the vacation application is as follows: I. That an application for vacation was initiated b Ruth M ckleb on Y y y the 6th day of April, 1982; 2. That a majority of the owners of property abutting aid alley have g y e signed a petition for the above - described vacation; 3. That said vacation has been referred to and reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on the 3rd day of May, 1982 and referred back to the Maplewood City Council with the recommendation of approval. 4. That pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851 a public hearing was held on the 20th day of May, 1982 receded b P y two - weeks published and posted notice at which meeting the City Council heard all who expressed a desire to be heard on the matter, considered the Plan- ning Commission recommendation and staff reports. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above described alley public interest in the property will accrue to the following described abutting properties: 1. Lot 5, Block 1, Belisle's First Addition 2.. S 135 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Belisle's First Addition 3. Subject to streets the N 1/"2 of 2nd Avenue adj and E 1/2 of Lot 2 Block 15, Smith and Taylors Addition to North St. Paul All in Section 11, Township 29, Range 22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Maplewood City Council finds that it is in the public interest to grant the above - described vacation on - the following findings of fact: 1. The right of way is in excess of the public need. 2. It is presently maintained for residential purposes by adjacent property J P P Y owners. 3. Vacating will increase the buildable area of adjacent properties. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be a notice of completion of the proceedings pursuant Statutes, Section 412.851 and shall cause the same Auditor for entry in his transfer records and that filed with the Ramsey County Recorder, subject to over the entire vacated right of way, and hereby is directed to prepare to the provisions of Minnesota to be presented to the County the same shall be thereafter the retention of a utility easement Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. - 7 - 5/20 J. NEW BUSINESS 2. Board of Adjustments and Appeals a. Manager Evans stated in reviewing the State planning law, it appears that it is not necessary for the Council to convene as the Board of Appeals and Adjust— ments to consider variances. Council can act on them as the City. Council, Section 462.354, sub. 2 of State law states that "the governing body may provide alternatively that there be a separate board of appeals and adjustments or that the governing body or the planning commission or a committee of the planning commission serve as the board of appeals and adjustments..." The cities of White Bear Lake, Maple Grove, Eagen, and Woodbury are examples of cities where variances are handled by their city councils, rather than a board of adjustments and appeals. Eliminating the board would have the following advan— tages: 1. Less confusion for the audience 2. Separate minutes would not have to be done 3. Simpler agenda. If the Council would like to make this change, they should direct staff to revise the appropriate ordinances. b. Councilmember Maida moved to direct staff to revise the appropriate ordinances. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes — all. F. PUBLIC.HEARINGS ( continued) 30 Rezoning: County Road B — Olson — 7:45 P.M. a. Acting Mayor Juker convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Mr. Warren Olson, 1942 E. County Road B to rezone a parcel of land located west of 1942 East County Road B from F —Farm to R -2 Double Dwelling District. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in order and noted the dates of publication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. C* Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Kishel moved the Planning Commission recommend the City Council - adopt the zone change resolution, approving the zone change from F, Farm to R- 2 Residence District (Double Dwelling) for the property west of 1942 East County Road B, on the basis that: 1. The zone change would be consistent with the Land Use Plan. 2. The building would be compatible with the neighborhood. 3. There is a need for additional rental units within the City. Commissioner Fischer seconded. Ayes — Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Ellefson, Fischer, Hejny, Howard, Kishel, Pellish, Sletten, Whitcomb." d. Mr. Warren Olson, 1942 E. County Road B, the applicant, spoke on behalf of the proposal. - 8 - 5/20 e. Acting Mayor Juker called for proponents. None were heard. f. Acting Mayor Juker called for opponents. None were heard. g. Acting Mayor Juker closed the public hearing. h. Councilmember Bastian moved to approve the zone change from F -Farm to R -2 Double Dwelling as recommended by the Planning Commission and staff. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Maida. Nays - Acting Mayor Juker. Motion defeated - (4 votes needed). i. Acting Mayor Juker moved to reconsider the previous motion Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. j. Acting Mayor Juker introduced the following resolution and move its adoption: 82 - 5 - 59 WHEREAS, a rezoning procedure has been initiated by Warren Olson for a zone change from F -Farm to R2 Double Dwelling for the following described property: The north 300 feet of the westerly 10.55 acres of that part of the northeast 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29, Range 22, lyin g North- westerly of Wisconsin Central Railways, except the west 336 feet thereof and also except the Easterly 80 feet thereof. . the procedural history of this rezoning procedure is as follows: I. That a rezoning procedure has been initiated by Warren Olson � pursuant to Chapter 915 of the Maplewood Code; 2. That said rezoning procedure was referred to and reviewed by the Maplewood City Planning Commission on the 3rd day f May, Y Y� at which time said Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezone procedure be approved; 3. That the Maplewood City Council held a public hearing to consider the rezoning procedure, notice thereof having been published and mailed pursuant to law; and 4. That all persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and /or present written statements, and the Council considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA that the above - described rezoning be granted on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The change would be consistent with the Land Use Plan. 2. The use would be compatible with existing neighborhood character. 3. There is a need for additional rental units in Maplewood. - 9 - 5/20 Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - al.l. Acting Mayor Juker recessed the meeting at 8 :13 P.M. to convene as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Acting Mayor Juker reconvened the meeting at 8 :16 P.M. G. AWARD OF BIDS None. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. I. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. David Bauer, 1610 Sterling a. Mr. Bauer requested the City place no parking signs on Sterling from Larpenteur south and to improve the street lighting. He stated these measures would si g nifi- cantly deter people from unauthorized and illegal use of the area thereby removing a serious threat to the peace and security of the local residents. He further stated numerous calls to the police department during the past few years clearly attest to the seriousness of the problem. b. Council directed staff to obtain police reports and engineering reports an g g p d present them to Council. J. NEW BUSIN (continued) 3. Frost Avenue Reconstruction a. Manager Evans presented staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to table to the June 14, 1982 meetin . Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 4. Special Exception Permit - Home Occupation - Petersen a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Barrett moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of the home occupation for -an electronic equipment repair business -at 2169 Arkwri g ht Street, subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the criteria outlined in the Planning Commission Subcommittee report. The twenty percent floor area criteria in guideline three shall not apply to the day -care facility. 2. Approval is granted for one year, after which time the applicant may apply PP Y for a renewal if the business has been compatible with the neighborhood .land all conditions are being met. — 10 — 5/20 3. The sign presently mounted on the antenna mast, along the garage, shall be removed. 4. There should be at least one ten pound ABC fire extinguisher provided in the basement workshop area. 5. The basement work area shall be properly wired to eliminate the need for exten- sion cords to operate ceiling lights and equipment. 6. No outdoor storage of business - related equipment shall be permitted. Commissioner Kishel seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Howard, Kishel, Pellish, Sletten Nays - Commissioners Fischer, Hejny, Ellefson, Whitcomb." C. Mr. Todd Petersen, 2169 Arkwright Street, the applicant, spoke on behalf of his request. d. Mr. Mark Simmons, 2175 Arkwright Street, spoke in favor of the proposal. e. Councilmember. Anderson moved to a22rove the s ecial exception 2ermit as requested by Mr. Todd Petersen, 2169 Arkwri ht, to operate an electronics equipment repair and sales business from his ho me subject to the following conditions: 1'. Compliance with the criteria outlined in the Planning Commission Subcommittee report. The twenty percent floor area criteria in guideline three shall not apply to the day -care facility. 2. Approval is granted for one year, after which time the applicant may apply for a renewal if the business has been compatible with the neighborhood and all conditions are being met. 3. The sign presently mounted on the antenna mast, along the garage, shall be removed. 4. There should be at least one ten pound ABC fire extinguisher provided in the basement workwhop area. 5. The basement work area shall be properly wired to eliminate the need for exten- sion cords to operate ceiling lights and equipment. 60. No outdoor storage of business - related equipment shall be permitted. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 5. Special Exception - Mundon a. Manager Evans stated the City Council, on April 15, requested that this permit be reconsidered. The original staff report and minutes are enclosed. One of the conditions of the permit is that "Ceramics class students must park in the John Glenn Jr. High parking lot ". It was reported to the Council that this condition is not being met. Staff inspected the site on several week nights within the last two weeks. There were no cars parked on the street. — 11 — 5/20 It is recommended to direct staff to periodically check the site over the next three months to assure compliance with Council conditions. If violations occur at any time, this case should be put back on the Council agenda for reconsideration of the permit. No further action is recommended at this time. b. Mrs. Donna Mundon, 2091 Hazelwood Street, spoke on behalf of her permit. C, Acting Mayor Juker moved to direct staff to periodicalIX check the site of the special exception at 2091 Hazelwood S treet o the next three months to assure compliance wit Council's original conditions; if violations occur at any time this case should be put back on the Co unci l agenda for rec onsideration of the permit; allow three nights of ceramic classes; student arking to be at John Glenn; and the permit to be reviewed in one year. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. Acting Mayor Juker called a 5 minute recess at 9:10 P.M. Acting Mayor Juker reconvened the meeting at 9 :15 P.M. 6. Authorization to Sell Bonds a. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 82 -5 -60 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC SALE OF $3 GENERAL OBLIGATION TEMPORARY IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1982 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby found, determined and declared that this City should issue $3,050,000 General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds of 1982 to refund at maturity the outstanding $3,420,000 General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds of 1979, dated August 1, 1979, and to provide funds for the construction of various improvements to the City. 2. This -Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the form of notice hereinafter contained for the purpose of opening and considering sealed bids for, and awarding the sale of $3,050,000 General Obligation Temporary Improve- ment Bonds of 1982 of said City. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper of the City and in Commercial West not less than ten days in advance of date of sale, as provided by law, which notice shall be in substantially the form set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto. 4. The terms and conditions of said bonds and the sale thereof are fully set forth in the "Official Terms of Bond Sale" attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes -.all. - 12 - 5/20 7. Write Off of Uncollectible Paramedic Bills for 1981 .a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson moved to table until the meeting of June 14, 1982 for further investigation by the City Attorney. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes — all. 8. Code Amendment: Definition of Family — 2nd Reading a. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE N0, 514 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 916 OF THE MAPLEWOOD CITY CODE RELATING TO THE DEFINITION OF FAMILY, ROOMING HOUSE AND BOARDING HOUSE THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 916 is hereby amended to revise the following language (language to be deleted is crossed out, language to be added is underlined): 414- r91-9- r -4 -74— Fay lyf - - Any e�x�be�— s�— �e�ee�e— ����eg— ae�— esek�eg— � ege�he� — es — ��eg�e— heeeekee��eg —�e��. 916 (7). Family: A family is one of the following, living together as a single housekeeping unit: a. An individual or a group of persons not to exceed five, who are not related by blood, marria foster children, or adoption, or b. Two persons related by blood, marriage, foster children, or adoption and not more than three unrelated persons, or C. Three or more persons related by blood, marriage, foster children, or adoption and not more than two unrelated persons. Section 2. Section 916.010 is hereby amended to add the following language: 916.010 (24) Boarding House: A rooming house in which meals are provided. 916.010 (25) Rooming House: Any single housekeeping unit in which space is rented, less meals, to persons unrelated to the resident manager or property owner, in excess of the definition of family, as defined in Section 916.010 (7). Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after passage and publication. Seconded by Acting Mayor Juker. Ayes — all. 9. Ordinance — Metal Buildings a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mr. Vic Lydon, Community Design Review Baord, explained the Board's position regarding metal building. — 13 — 5/20 c. Councilmember Anderson moved to refer this item to staff for further investigation and that a full report be submitted to Council by June 28, 1982. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 10. Sideyard Setbacks - RE District a. Councilmember Maida introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE N0, 515 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING SETBACKS IN R -E DISTRICTS THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 919.050 (3) is hereby amended as follows: 919.050 (3) Minimum setbacks. a. Within R -3 Districts, the following minimum building setbacks for dwellings, accessory buildings and driveways shall apply: R -E (20) R —E (30) R -E ( 40 ) Side Yard Setback 15 feet 20 feet 25 feet b. All other setbacks shall be as required for R -1, Residence District (Single Dwelling). Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 11. Street Overlay Program a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Acting Mayor Juker introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 82 -5 -61 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota deems it expedient and necessary; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that staff is hereby authorized to secure bids for the 1982 Sealcoat and Bituminous Overlay Program; Staff is further directed to appropriately sign Myrtle Street south of Larpenteur Avenue so as to deny construction traffic from the south the use of the overlaid Myrtle Street in order to prevent damage thereto. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 12. Reconsideration - Plan Update 14 — 5/20 a. Councilmember Bastian moved to reconsider the motion of Ma 6 • the Plan U date and that the item � 1.982 a rovin be laced on the. June 28, 1982 Agenda Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - a11. 13. Mortgage Note Criteria a. Manager Evans stated during 1981 the City collected only 1% of y the current special assessment installments that were due. At the end of 1981 delinquent special assessment were $1,282 007 � outstanding � , To cope with this problem the payment of delinquent special assessments will be required prior • permits, q p to the issuance of building permits, special use P s, -plat approvals and lot divisions. The criteria for mortgage revenue note financing should also be revised to require that proceeds from the note be used as follows: 1. To pay all delinquent taxes and special assessments. 2. To pay all deferred and special or deferred assessemnts. 3. To provide a cash escrow for payment of all endin special P g p assessments. Items two and three would virtually eliminate the possibility of future delinquent special assessments on projects financed by mortgage revenue notes. It is recommended that the Council adopt the above additional requirements q ements for mortgage revenue note financing. b. Acting Mayor Juker moved to adopt the amendment to the Mort e Revenue Note Criteria to include the following: I. To pay all delinquent taxes and special assessments. 2. To pay all deferred and special or deferred assessments. 3. To provide a cash escrow for payment of all ending special p g p al assessments. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 14. Approval of Minutes a. Minutes No. 82 -10 (April 15, 1982) Councilmember Bastian moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 82-10 (April 15, 1982) as corrected: Page 6: Item F 3 h "Maida" Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - Actin Mayor J • Acting y uker, Councilmembers Bastian and Maida. Councilmember Anderson abstained. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Mobile Home - Kingston and Payne a. Councilmember Maida stated there was a mobile home arked at Kingston Payne and p g on and Pa y questioned if they had approval from the City. b. The mobile home was approved by Council to house a caretaker for the cemetary. 15 - 5/20 2. Dead End Disignation as Councilmember Maida requested "dead end" signs for cul de sacs. b. Staff to investigate. 3. Budget a.. Councilmember Bastian stated he felt it was time to think about the 1983 Budget. b. Council established a budget meeting for June 2, 1982 at 7:00 P.M. Council - member Bastian to find appropriate place. 4. City Property a. Councilmember Anderson suggested that the City maintain their own property better. 5. Dog and Cat Patrol a. Councilmember Anderson requested more hours be authorized for animal control. 6. Williams Pipe Line a. Councilmember Anderson questioned if Williams Pipe Line Company was still cooperating with the City. b. Staff stated they were. Acting Mayor Juker moved to extend the meeting past the deadline. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 7. Metro Council as Councilmember Anderson stated the Metro Council is getting involved into Cable TV and requested a survey be taken to see if the Metro Council is really needed. b. Council directed letters be forwarded to the Association of Minnesota Munici- palities and the Ramsey County League of Municipalities. 8. Survey Requirements a. Acting Mayor Juker stated problems have arisen with late splits due to the fact the land has not been surveyed and requested that surveys be submitted before lot divisions, special use permits, etc. are approved. b. Acting Mayor Juker moved to refer the matter to staff and report to Council at the June 28, 1982 meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 9. Don John Property. a. Acting Mayor Juker requested copies of all Council actions regarding this property. - 16 - 5/20 e 10. Home Occupation License a. Acting Mayor Juker questioned if home occupation permits could be separated from the special exception permits; in that way perhaps home occupation permits could be tied to a person rather than the property and if they could, be licensed annually. b. Acting Mayor Juker moved to refer home occupation licenses to the staff for investigation. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 11. Post Office - Branch a. Acting Mayor Juker moved staff to draft a letter to whomever may help in getting a branch post office in Maplewood (Congressmen, United States Senator and United States Post Office). Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Secretary a. Manager Evans requested the moratorium on hiring be lifted and a secretary f to.be shared by the Finance Director and himself be hired. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to authorize the hiring of a secretary to be shared by the Manager and Finance Director. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 2. Hotel -Motel Revenue a. Councilmember Anderson moved to notify the Secretary of State the Council's ratification of the Hotel -Motel Revenue Note financing legislation that was p assed. Seconded by Acting Mayor Juker. Ayes - all. 3. Unsafe Building a. City Attorney Patrick Kelly requested the Council to advise Mrs. Edna Ocheltree that her building at 2585 Ariel has been declared unsafe and she is to remove such building within 20 days or the City shall do so and bill her. b. Councilmember Bastian moved that the order of removal of the unsafe and hazar- dous building at 2585 Ariel be approved as recommended by the City Attorney. Seconded by Acting Mayor Juker. Ayes - all. M. ADJOURNMENT 11:05 P.M. City Clerk - 17 - 5/20 A C G O U N T S P A Y A 9 L E DATE oe �a v c . W00D MAPLE QTY OF E � U R P O S E CHECK A M U N T C L A I M A N .T ,f - __�- I NS,iNSURANCE pNTRI C o - - - - - 000 53 7 4,142.01 - 14jSf _ AL LIFE INS CO MN INS C ONTINUANCE 3 652.91 MN MUTUAL L I F E INS C a R .. A� --- -- - - - _E AND- HEALTH INS PAYASL 0 , 30 - - -- 53 8 ---- ' AND -LIFE INS OED PAYABLE AND - DENTAL INS PA - ANO�CpNT18UTi0NS IiVSURAN� — 24 3 O fl _ MINN STA T EASURcR ST ATE OIL FEES P 00 MV LICENSE FEES PAYABLE - 030 5 , 552.50 MINN STATE TREASURER — _ __ - - -- - _- FO- TR �t�T1049.9 INSURANCE CON _. .- - - -- _- _._____- ---- -- _ 1 9 T 0.0 9 � - - i FE A SSURNCE GREAT WEST L 600.541. � 2 , 3 21.4+ GR EAT NEST LIFE ASSURNCE A/ • INS CONTINUANCE - _ _- _-- INS pAYASL� AND HEAL GOD 54 Z .________ - -- _ - - -- -- -- - AND -LIFE INS DED PA YABLE AND_C BUT O N S • I NS URAN _ -- - - -- _ MN STATE THE ASURrER•PERA CONTRIBUTIONS, �'ERA CO 0 04 54 3 l , 886.48 -- - - -- _ A _ 9LE . ­04—Y - P. E. R. A. DEO __- ___� - - - --- 3,943.31 -- ---- NN STATE TREASURER -PERA ANfl -C4 NTRiBUTi oNS, 'ERA 0 J 0544 8,433.2 _. - - -- - - -- _ -- - -- - - . ---- - _._�� s TAB � t R� A suR�� - ERa - P A P A 9L E P . E * R • A • D E D � ,. o N TRI BUT z o Ns , PERA AND C Gil' 54 0fl _- - -- - _ ,, � A NN STATE TRE SURc _ STATE D/ FEES P A Y A B L E 030546 238.00 L A N fl 9 E AS E MENTS _._ _ ---- -- D G G 54 T ---_ - STEP OcID S HE A -� A Y A�. E LICENSE FEES P _- 030548 4 , 69 ?5 NINN STAGE TREASURER MV _ _ -- - YA FEES PA BLS -, Soso .._ � RK OF DI ST RA�sEY Co CL� GNTY D/L . 0O-545 STATE D/L FEES PAY --- MINN S T a T E T R E A SUR ._ - ___.... -. --- - -- - -- - _ - TRAVEL + TRAINING 000551 13.25 .JUDY . CtiLESECK LICENSE FEES PAYABLE mv OGG552 � MI ST ATE T FEE PAYABL 324.00___ .- MINN ST TREASURER STA D/L _ 000553 - --____ - - - - FEES PAYABLE MV LICENSE 2,641 . 95 MINN STATE TREASURER _ - - 030554 — - MV LICENSE FEES PAYABLE - - - - - -- _ OG 555 3, 666.10 STATE T REa S URE R r.R MI NN . FEES PAYA9Lt 2 5 6.0 0 _ MI N N S A T T R E A S U R .R _t _______ - STATE D/L _ O fl _ -- 1%0ITY of MAPLE Woo 0 A CHECK* A M O U N T A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A 8 L E .DATE 06_28..82 PAGE 2 C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E w - 100 557 264.66 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP DEFERRED COMP PAYABLE AND- DEFERRED COMPENSATION 000 17,888,-.85 HAPLEWOOD STATE BANK FED INCOME TAX PAYABLE 000559 7.182.09 STATE of MN STATE INCOME TAX PAYABLE 000560 200000 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYST DEFERRED COMP PAYABLE + 0 0 0 561 297.43 AF SC ME LOCAL 2725 UNION DUES PAYABLE AND -FAIR SHARE FEES PAYAF 000 562 24.00 METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOC UNION DUES PAYABLE 000563 277000 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS CO DEFERRED COMP PAYABLE 000564 10,804.00 CITY } CTY CREDIT UNION CREDIT UNION DED PAYABLE - 000565 _ 145900 ROSEMARY ICANE MA GE 0£DUCTIONS .. PAYABLE 000 566 387.50 MAPLEWOOD STATE BANK WAGE DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 000 567 632.25 MN TEAMSTERS LOCAL 320 UNI CN DUES PAYABLE 000 56 2, 277.25 MINN STATE TREASURER MV LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 000569 201.00 MINN STATE TREASURER STATE D/L FEES PAYABLE 000 570 689.75 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 000 571 000572 5.78 3,151.29 CAROL NELSON MINN STATE TREASURER SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT MV LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 0 FO 0 57 3 140.00 MINN STATE TREASURER STATE D/L FEES PAYABLE 0 00 514 778. L8 CONN GENERAL LIFE INS C0 CONTRIBUTIONS, INSURANCE 0 . 00 575 _ 377.97 CONN GENERAL LIFE INS CO A/R - INS_ CONt I NUANCE - _ AND- CONTRIBUTIONS,INSURAM 000576 20.00 RAMSEY CTY CONCILIATION A/R - PARAMEDIC 000577 83.20 HARRY TEVLIN UNIFORMS * CLOTHING 000579 73.00 RAMSEY CO CLERK OF DIST CNTY D/L FEES PAYABLE 0Q0 _ 3 MINN STATE TREASURER M11 LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 000 581 1430 MINN STATE TREASURER STATE 0/L FEES PAYABLE k: lowt- y OF MAPl.EW000 A C G 0 U N t S P A r A e L� 'HE GK* A M O U N T C L A I M A N T i Vn s L -- p u R P 0 S E ., . v r* cuc c crcc D v11 10` 58Z 1 0 0 583 afl 58 4 330585 OOG58b 52 3� • Ofl • 2 + 3 1 T, 00 330 00 li+ 360* 25 NiNN STATE TREASURER MN SOFTBALL FECERATi ON E MINN STATE TREASURER - MINN STATE TREASURER METRO WASTE CO NTROL C SuBSCRi PT i oNS MEMBERSHIP MV LICENSE PEES PAYABLE -- STATE D/L FEES PAYABLE . S . A. _ PAYABLE _.. _ Onfl - - COG589 i8 296.96 1 + 2 061.95 9 MUELLER PI PELINERS MINN STATE TREASURER MINN STATE TREASURER MINN AWARDED CONST CONTRAC - MV LICENSE FEES I PAYABLE STATE D ♦L - F DES Pa ya LE 0 0059 0 - 25.46 POST MASTE POSTAGE -- 000591 -- -- _ fl 3 0 59 2 0005 75 0• DO - Z 165.50 + 7 0 3.37 POST MASTER - MAPLELEAF Of FICIAL� ASSN T X MINN STAT T RE -S a POSTAGE FEES SERVICE Soft all Ump C HA R GE TAX PAY ABL E SURC - - - ----- ' 00059 0 00 595 -- 58 2 2 5.50 Z+ 454.50 - - - 37 238+506• STATE TR MINN S -- - _ MAINN STATE TREASURER - .- - - - - - - IlVCE NE CESSARY EXPENDITURES S STATE D/L FEES P AYABLE_ . MV LI FEES P A Y A $ �. E - LAST COUNCIL. M 7r of MaPLFa000 CHECK' A M 0 U N T A C C G U N TS PAY Y A S L E DATE 06-28 -82 PAGE 4. C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E uA IV ..w na f%P &NDf%C% 0 fl 134 5 10 4.10 ARI MECHANICAL SERVICES Kt L Ir w 0134D -- 132.98 - ACE HARDWARE SUPPLIE .JANITORIAL AN0 -SMALL TOOLS 013414 47s BATTERY * TIRE WHSE INC AND- MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00415 59.22 BOARD OF WATER COMM AND- -SUPPLI ES, EQUIPMENT fl 1340) 314940 AMERICAN AUTO TRIM REP. +� !lAINT., VEHICLES 013408 148.50 AQUA ZY ME M ID WE ST. FEES, SERVICE Che mical Toilets 0 13.40 9 10.04 ARTS I GN SUPPLIES, OFFICE 013410 110.40 ARTS TOWING SUPPLIES, VEHICLE �j 013420 34.9 CHIPPEwa SPRINGS CO . FEES, SERVICE Water Cooler 013411 30.00 ASSN OF METROPOLITAN tKAYLL. 'r 11%M.LR♦ 1'%%7 013 3 9 fl 6�+. 00 ITA ASSN OF �lETROPO�. N SUBSCRIPTIONS ♦MEMBERSHIP = 013413 95.21 BADGE A MINT SUPPLIES, PROGRAM 013414 47s BATTERY * TIRE WHSE INC SUPPLIES, VEHICLE 00415 59.22 BOARD OF WATER COMM UTILITIES 00 416 b 88.14 BILL BOYER FORD . SUPPLIES, VEHICLE - G13417 188.88 - BF�LSSMAN KENNEDY I NC SUPPLIES, JANI TORIAL 013418 12.25 BROWN PHOTO O SUPPLIES, EQUIPME 013419 93.48 CHAPLIN PUBLIS LEGAL + FISCAL �j 013420 34.9 CHIPPEwa SPRINGS CO . FEES, SERVICE Water Cooler a 013421 44903 COLLINS ELEC TRICAL CoNST RED. } MAINT., UTILITY �' � { 013422 300.00 CO TOURS CO FEES s SERVICE ��.Citizens Trip Senior' ­.Citizens { - i1 r' fl13423 - 220.00 COP Y DUPLICATING PROD A � �� COSTS DUPLIC T f 41342 4 _ 203. 35 COP1f- EQUIPMENT OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS _ } NT • , EQIt AND REP • MA I :1 ANO-SUPPLIES• OFFICE s -- 0 13425 98.21 DALCO CORP SUPPLIES, JANITORIAL s, t _.0.13 6 234.0.0 PAT DALEY FEES , SERVICE Plumbing Inspector c 01342 7 - 122.12 DAVES ELECTRIC R E P • o. MA I NT • • 8L DG } GRD S OF MAPLEW HECK* A M O U N T ACC O U H T S P A T` G w e-maim p U R P O S E C-L A I M .A N T neft & MATNT_ u VEHICLES 3, 39.00 DIAMOND RADIATOR REP R r i3 42.8 REP- ; MAI NT., EQUIPMENT 042 9 51.00 DICTAPHONE CORP -_ y51540.00 EAST CO LINE FIRE DEPT FEES, SERVICE 2nd Qtr. Fire Protection 13430 -- - - i � 39 00 - - LL I NC EK13L AD PA RDEE♦ BE E '- - I WSURKNCE 1343.1 � ELECTRONIC CENTER INC REp • + MAI NT. , RADIO 13432 58.84. TRAVEL f TRAINING 11.70 DANI F FAUST 13 433 __.-- FIRE SAFETY PRODUCTS I NC SUPPLI ESs VEHICLE — 0 13434 .396098 98 FEES, SERVICE ------ 01343 52 ,858. 75 GLAOSTONE FIRE DEFT 2nd tr, Fire Protect ion Q - 242.0 4 GOODYEAR SERV ICE STORE SUPPLIES+ VEHICLE 013436 EQUIPMENT, OTHER 013437 41 5.00 - R L GOULD CO INC TRAVEL } TRAINING _0 45. 84 _ JANET GRE 013438 UN IFORMS + CLOTHING 013439 357.80 GROSS INDUSTRIAL AND -F SER . Cl _ Rugs eaned UNIFORMS + CLOTHING 013440 185.50 GROSS INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT 33.7 2 _ -- -- ---- -- GRUBERS HAROWARE HANK SU P F LI E S, -MAINTENANCE MATERIALS AND A .013 441 i SUPPLIES* GROGRAM a 13442 86.f�3 NORTON CRAFT REP- ♦ MAINT.1 VEHICLE ©1 301.70 HO WI ES L OCK + K EY St RY IC -- -- 68900 00 INTL BIAS MACHINES CORP SUPPLIES, OFFICE D 13 444 - - INTE RNAT10NAL MARV�.STER SUPPLIES, VEHI CLE - -- - 013445 b2.75 SUPPLI J ANITORIAL- - Q $2.20 K -MA RT AND•SUPPLIES, PROGRAM MAIN MATE RS C 13 44 = 13 9 .32 KNOX .U COM PANY . _ - - -- _- FE ES 9 SERVICE 013448 1b 9.5 0 LAKE SANITATION Rubb Removal --_ _ _. _ — _ r x.2d 00 LAKE SANITATION FEES9 SERVICE- 01 . 9 S BSCRI PT IONS M EM8E R SHI P 013450_ 1 7 8 2 .0__0 LEAG OF M INK- .C ___ _�. - T Y OF MAPL "UUU CHECK* A M 0 U N T C L A I M A N T 116.95 MAPLEWOOD REVIEW 013451 59.x++7 LEES AUTO SUPPLY PURPOSE. 5u v t# L1 t a , c aul r nr r4 s AND - SUPPLIES, VEHICLE �.... • 4W .......ate 287; 97 LU GER LUMBER Su rL�t�, r-wu &rntm 1 013452 ANO- MAINTENANCE MATERIALS - V SUPPLIES, PROGRAM 013453 973 MAPLFW000 BAKER n 4 3454 140 MlAPLE REVI SU BSCRI PT I O NS+ MEMBE 0131+55 —,� —a.1m►. uam u aft c fl PUBLISHING 01345 6 14.80 MAPLEWOOD REVIEW SUn . Zi toK.L r i vma E. 113L1%d11i u 0134 100.04 MAPLEWOOD PAINTING REP. + MlAZ NT. , BL OG }GRDS 013458 145.00 MASON PUBLISHING BOOKS 0135 9 11.36 - CO MERIT CHtVR4LET C SUPPLIES* V EHICLE 0134 5b2. 8fl NSPET o N METROPOLITA = FE Es , SERVICE Electrical Inspection 013451 5 451.00 9+ MIDWAY FORD CO ��► VEHICL 013462 197.00 MIDWAY TRACTOR Su PP LI ES, VEHICLE -- 013 46 3 . 2b4. 88 LS STAR + TRIBUNE CO MP LS PUBLISHING 01.3 35.78 MINNESO BEARING CO SUPPLIES, VEH 00465 2b7.Ofl MN BLUEPRINT NT OTHER CONSTRUCTIO COSTS � OFFICE AND•SUPPLItSs 00466 18.50 M N CL AY St3PPLIES9 PROGRAM - -- 013457 125 MN DEPARTMENT PUBLIC FEES 9 SERVICE P.O.S.S.E. Maint. X71 34 8 _---- -_____ 5l 0 . � 0 MI MINING } MFG CO REP* + MA INT• , EQ UI PMENT 013469 9 8fl• 00 MN REC } PARKS ASSOC SU BSCRI PT IONS } MEM BERSHIP - -- - --- _- 013470 bfl. GD WASTEWATER OPP ASSOC NN W TRAVEL + TRAINING _ _� l 471 1 T • 45 MINN STATE TREASURER r-.— BOOKS 013472 2 +055.00 MOLINE PRINTING PUBLISHING -- - - - - -- - fl 1347 3 - 1,105. li CITY 0 F MOUNDS VIEW FEES, SERVICE Data Processing r FRI W974, T Y OF MAPLEWOOD r CHECK* A M 0 U N T A C C O U N T S PAY A B L E C L A I M A N T DATE 06.28' 82 PA61- P U R P O S E T 013474 25.Oa MUNIC• FINANCE OFFICERS BOOKS All 475 135.00 HUNIC. FIN CE OFFICERS SUBSCR IPTIONS F MEM BERS 013476 25018 N ATIONAL ATI NAL BUSINESS SYSTEM SUPPLIES• OFFICE 013477 15.00 NATIONAL R IFLE ASSOC SUBSCRIPTIONS #- ME�lBEPSHI P__ 01347 5050 RO BERT NELSON TRAVEL TRA INING 013479 1. 382e CITY OF NORTH ST PAUL UTILITIES _ - - 40480 2 4 . NORT HERN STATES P OWER CO UT ILITIES 0 1.3-481 . 94 9.8 8 NOR THERN STATES POWER CO UT ILIT IE S . 013482 835.54 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO UTILITIES 013483 11,420008 NORT HERN s S Po Co UT ILTit ES 0 13 48 4 129009 NORT STATE POWER CO ._ UTILITIES 013485 19100018 NO cT H WEST ERN BELL. TEL CO TELEPHO O i3 48 6 643.55 NORTHWESTERN BALL. TEL CO TELEPHONE C 13 4 7 25 7.5 T NOR T HWE ST ERN B ELL T EL CO . _ TE 0. 13488 424.7 3 NO RTHWESTERN BELL TEL CO TELEPHONE - 0 - 48 - 4 290.73 USH OLD DOMINION ON BR SUPPLI VEHICLE 013 49 0 --- - 3 4 , i O 1. 25 PAkKSIDE FIRE DE PT FEES SER VICE ------ - - -_-- n Qtr Fire Protectio 013 491 2, 075.00 CON PETERSON, BELL t CON FEES, SERVICE - Retainer for Prosecuti Att i 49 2 i 2 00.• 25 EU MAINT Co PETROL SERVICE FEES, SCE Pump Gas Tanks 013 49 3 9b. fl0 .. INC PITNE BOWES I REP* . } MAI N , EQU �FME NT . 0.13494 15.00 COLIC E MARKSMAN ASSOC SU SSCRIPTIONS+ MEM BERSHI P _ 0 _ 13495 23.5+ POL A CME V SUPPLIES, VEHICLE 0 13 49 6 1, 375.00 POSTMA POSTAGE . 013497 8.3 5 JOSEPH FRET T NER 0 TRAVEL I- TRAINING __.____,__ 013 498 - 243.00 U K PRINTING PUBLISHING TY of MAPLEw000 }� CK� C HECK* A H O U N T C L A I M.A N T P U R P O S E _ 01349 9 40.0 0 A SoC P A RA MS E Y CLINIC S FEES, SERVICE Examination 01 3 0 45.51 RA MS EY COUNTY TREASURER SUPPLIES, O FFICE -- 01350 71• TO �. � ICE REEDS SAL t SERV SUPPLIES VEHICLE D13 502 15 5.60 ROAO RESCUE INC SUPPLIES, VEHICLE 013503 371.88 SNi TESTING OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEES D 13504 - 395 91 • S + S ART + CRA SU PPLI ES 9 PROG _ 01350 5 2 8.84 S T OFFICE PRODUCTS SUPPLIES OFFICE 01350E 1, 367. 80 t A SCHIF S KY ♦ SONS I N C MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 19 350.23 ' SCH OELL � �lAD IN C OUTSIDE ENGINEE F E ES - _fl 01350$ 55.00 SEAMAN NUCLEAR CORD REP. f HAINT., EQUIPMENT _ 013509 197.86 - SEARS ROCBUCK + CO UNIFORMS + CLOTHING AND•SMALL t COLS 01 3510 141997.01 U L SHIELY CO MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 013 51�r BTl. b4 SOLIDIFICA I NC FEES SER ewer Lines 3 12 01 5 296.69 ST PAUL DI SPATCH PUBLISHING - _ 013 513 167.20 ST PAUL RENT ALL RENTAL, EQUIPMENT 4 42.96 PA LINE STAPLES MAINT M ATERIAL S AHD - TR V A EL + TRAINI 0135.1'5 180.90 STO SPRI + ALIGNM N t REP. t MAI VEHIC 01351 6 38.85 SUNRISE STANDARD FUEL } OI - 5 17 013 - 1,535,90 SUPERAMERICA CIL FUEL � . _. 0 1 3 518 5b6. 82 SUPERAMERICA SUPPLIES, EQ UIPMENT � -P EL ♦ OIL A N 0 U 013519 . 484. SUPERAMERICA CA FUEL *OIL 0 l3 52 0 82.31 SUPERAMERICA } AN FUEL CIL fl •REP • + MAI N , VEHI C TABULA? IN_G SERV BUREAU FEESs SERVICE to Proces sin Data a 013521 - 76.50 ;T Y OF M APLEWOO D r CHECK* A M 0 U N T A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E C L A I M A N T DATE 06 -28 -82 PAGE P U R P O S E 9 _48.96 TARGE STnRFq TNC SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT 013522 AND— MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 013523 1950.00 J THOMAS ATHLETIC CO SUPPLIES, PROGRAM 013 28966 H R TOLL CO MAINTENANCE M ATERIALS 013525 5 76. g3 HERB TOUS EY FORD INC R L REP. + PAINT., VEHICLES ©13526 .6 13 0 TWIN CITY COURIER PUBLISHING - -- 0135 7 .0 82 0 TWIN CITY JANITOR SUPPLY _._ - - -- SUPPLI - EQ - 0052 x.06.79 IN ITY HARDWARE CO TW IN MAINTENANCE MATERIALS - - - - 2 9 0135 UNIFORMS t CLOTHING 8 2 3 48 U NLIMI TED UNI F ORMS J1 3530 530 235.65 VALS BODY SHOP REP* ♦ MAINT. , V EHICLES 01 3 531 126.75 VA UG HN S SUPPLIES , PROGRAM 13.532 114.80 VIRTUE PRINTING CO SUPPLIES OFFICE 37.0 WARNERS TR EVALUE HOW MA INTENANCE MATERIALS 013 533 1 8 PFL ES JANITORIAL. AH O — SU I � A ND-SUPPL IE S, _EQU AtiO SMALL TOOLS 013 534 77.06 _ WE BE R * TROSET INC R + MA , V EHIC LE S AN D — SM ALL. TOOLS 013 53 5 24 * 30 WHITE B OFFICE PR SUPP LIESt OFFICE II 1353 6 2 70.77 XEROX CORPORATION DUPLICATIN COSTS Oi35 T 56085 ZACKS CHEMICALS 0 3 53 8 281.25 CENTUR FE NCE _ MAIN TENANCE MATER _ 013539 9 * 49.87 EILEEN BAKER WAGES, P/T + TEMP. - -- --- -- 013540 74o25 PAUL HAAG WAGES, P/T * TEMP • 3541 33.75 PAUL _ PETERSON WAGES9 P/T * T EMP* Oi - 0135 176.25 JEFFERY RASCHKE WAGES9 P/T + TEMP. __ _ -- 3 HLEEN SPANNSAUER WAGES, P/T TEMP. 01 54 3 51, 30 KA ; TY of MAPLEWOO A C C 0 U N T S p A T A .. J r . W� & ..._.w 4 6 � V tAW + r r C H E CK * A M 0 U N T C L A I H A N T . P U R P 0 S E -- -- 150.On � — C GARY T�.WINKEL WAGzS, P/T � TEMPO -- _ - -- 3.0+•_ - THOMAS THEL WAGE G E S � AND _ TRAVEL P / T + � TEMPO--,---- T RAINING 0 54 6 741 25 JON THOM WALLAC 4 WAGES P/ T TEM O 013 54 7 11.55 A ZEKA RICHARD ALLE W R WAGE. St P/T + TEMP, - .� 013548 �� 474.30 MlAURIC E �iEINB�:ATT WAGES P/T }TEMP. .� 013 549 .� i 8 . 00 DENN -_ I N DENNIS AU B R E F U N D -- 013550 13900 JUDY BROCKWA Y R E F U N D 013 551 �. - T. 00 SHARON 8OC KL Ut�i3 R E F U N D D 1 3 55.2 � 8 000 M RS 0 4 NAL O C A L D WE L _ - - -- _ R E F U N -- - . - - - 0 - -- 413553 � 9.70. A RICKSON � DIANE � R E F U N D . 01355 3.00 SUSAN ERICKSDN R E F U N 0 013555 :; 9.0 0 S H A R t3 N G IE L _ ..` -_ _.______ R E F ... U N 0 - _ -.- 013556 9.00 MARTHA GINZL R E FU N D 0 13 557 " �, 12.00 KATHY HAYNES R E F U N D 0 13 55 8 _ 12.�D DE A HU NT R E- F v N o 0 i3 55 9 � 71000 C ONN I E INGROLOSTAD R' E F U N 0 ----- Q13560 - - -- �• � 12.00 GREG L ARS ON R E F U N D 4135bi 5 JEFF MURP R E F U N 0 - Q13562 13 a0 CAROL NELSON R E F U N D 00563 13.00 CAecO LYN NELSON R E F U N 0 013 5b �+ �� 13. fl0 JO NA .__ R E F U N D O13555* i2. 00 ENNORE RASSETT Lt R E F U N D -- 013566* 9.00 RUT H RO Bc L I A R E F U N D • �• 013 5b 7 � 1 6. 0 0 J ANE S J �E - -- R E F U N fl - 163 .. 266 103.35 CHECKS WRITTEN _ __ - TOTAL OF 221 CHECKS TOTAL 50 609 { _ INDICAT l.TE:I__E � � T L-- � - TY OF MAF.E hC00 FAYr�01.L RESORT PAG_ 1 . -� C ON R EG IS TER R�GIS CHECK OATS 06-18-82 NAM GROSS PAY _�... _ ___ _ _._- -- N ET PA Y.. - - - -- ___ --__- - - -- -- H EC K ---- -- -- -- -- - ____ -- ___ -- _ .. _______- 0 41 58 AND EERSON NORMAN G 27540 l 81.8 3 - x+159 0 B A S T I A N GAR1t w - - - 5- -. 0 .0 -- - 2 5 6.5 T 04 160 G R E V U JO ^ 251.83 - -- _ - __ 4161 J u K ER FRANCES ` 275. QQ 227.82 _ __ -- _ - -------------- 0 .............................. ..... _,--- NAIGA - - _- - N ARYL EE - -- T - _ - -- --- - 2 7 5.0_x_ r 2 3 T . 2 9 LOIS____ iV- 2 9 3.31 2 Z 0 . - 2 9 0 41.63 BEHM _ -_ _--... _ -_- -- 041 64 E V ANS BARRY R + 1, 817.54 1, 0 &6.60 . _._ - - - - -- '165 0 4 L�.WI S VI VAN R G 3 469*62 0 :�1 Eb PELCQUIN t �, A'FRE0 J 7 4 .2 3 - _ _ _ -_ -._ _.____ - - - - -- -- -_ _.._ - - - - -17 3.8 3_ 04167 S CHLE ICHER JOHN F 89.25 89.25 04168 CUCE LARR J . _.. __ - _--__ ♦ 91.54 i 44,v 7 8 04169 __..D0 HERTY _ __.___----- "E.00 - -Ka -T L. N! - -- 30 5 - -- ___ - - -- - 214, 0 417Q luERCHER J L 115.39 11. 5.21 - -- - - - - -- - - ___ 0 417 FAUST ,- 0 AN��L F - 4 4 6.4 6_ 1 � 9 3 2. 0 4 1 72 HaG: N -- - -- ---- ARL i �C---- -- -__� - 8 8 8.92 -- - - - - -- _ - -- - - -- ...__. _----- _ 4 0 3 . i 3 . - - - -- - - - - -- - - - -- - 677.54 4T0,48 -- - - - - -- - ? - - -- 04 _-- - -- - --- �/IGC'R_N - -r DELORES A -5 6*62 3 9 6.6 9 04175 A U F L I U S L O C I L- 3 5 0.4 6 _ .. _ _ -- -- - 6�8 2.4 0 76 SEL V0G BUTT Y 711.23 4:�4.T1 - - -- _ __ - - - _ - -- a. 4l 77 - - - GREEN __ - #� NY LL I S --- C - - - - --- 6 5.5 9 518.9 3 4 7$ SCH - �_ AM _L - - 13.0 0 - _ - __ - -- _ 13 _ : 0 0 4 7 S C H A 0 T ,� .. J �. A� N� �- 107. b8 88.32 -- - -- -- 0415 6 - --- V I IN. T OR - - -- - -- L O RR A I N E --- S - __ - -- - -- _5 61, 69 3 7 8.21 0 4180 _ - --- P CI_A A _ - - -- 3 3 4.5 3 -- - --___ __ -- -- _-- ____ --- _2 4 3 . T b -- 04 181 81 3ASTYR _ tOL80RAH A 5 3 2.16 2 5 3.7 T - - Tit OF MA.PLEWCOD PAYROLL REPORT PAGE 188.6 0 42 35 CERTIFICATION REGISTER CHECK DATE 06m18 -82 CHECK NAME GROSS PA - _ NET PAY 04182 H A G OEN THOMA L 1, 30 *83 a 41 83 365*40 OMATH JOY E 5 53*39 -0 4184 RICHIE CAROL L ___�_, 488. 295*56 0 1*1 SVENDSEN JOANNE m 696*60 4 -38 404, T3 041.36 ARNOLD DAVID L 04187 ATCHISON JOHN H ._ 1,9 036*15 689*39 04188 CAHANES ANTHONY G 19204*16 li3o94 04189 1 15 15 5.7 5 CLAUSON DALE K 04190 CCLLINS KENNETH v -- ____ 32beii 99088 0 4191 OREGER RICHARO c 19305*46 721*13 04192 ___"o 9 1 L 1,195.85 GREEN NORMAN 04i93 HALWEG K EV IN R 119 0 5 17 11 .04194 HEINZ STEPHEN 774*46 494,o51 04195 1, 625*76 -- - _- __ -- - - - -- - � - --- HERBERT H I C H A E. L 1 04196 JAQUITH DANIEL R 7714. 493*76 04197 KORTUS 30NAL0 v 50*84 45*85 04198 1,9056*00 ..523*73 1 LANG RICHARD 04157 MCNULTY JOHN . 1 . l - 19 59 39 155*75 04199 mEE-HANipJR JAMES E 997.38 510 *69 04200 672*27 MrETTLER DANIEL B 1 0 . 4 2 01 m 0 E S%`20% H T E R RICHARD' m 1,9064*43 163o65 0 42 02' MORELLI RAYMOND i 1, 016.77 669*79 0 L+ 2 0 3 703.93 PELTIER r. WILLIAM F It 29 04204 SKALMAN DONALD W 1, 0 188.6 0 42 35 STAFNE GREGORY L It 05 8.08 667*65 IT OF MAPLEWC00 PAYROLL REPORT PAGE 3 CERTIFICATION REGISTER CHECK OAT.E. 06-m18 mS2 C.H.E C K — NAME 04206 STILL VERNON T 042 - 07 STOCKTW� DAR RELL T GROSS PAY NET PAY 997*38 587*92 It 047. 671*08 04208 ZAFFA JOS E PH A .1* 197. 23 735*06 04239 s Em C K E R RONALD 0 1,9065o23 218*89 - 04210 7- It 1 1 7 00 848*56 S CUSICK DENNIS 04211 GRAF DAVID m 1- 581o56 04212 L E ROGER w 1, 1 4. 6.27*67 04213 065.2 3 1,7930 MELANDER JON A 0 4214 NELSON CAROL m It 06 692920 04215 RAZSKAZOFF DALE E It 0$ 4.61 173*48 1 478. TT p RYAN MICHAEL 04216 0.4217 VORWER K ROBERT E It 11 - -- 2 05' - 1 3 -- 0-4.218 YOUNGREN JAMES G 1*095*72 642#77 04219 EMBIERTSON JA 944*31 606oi8 04220 SCHADT A LFRE 0 . ......... c 1,9127*54 657*35 04221 FLAUGHER JAYME L 711*42 449*81 04222 0 -5 8 6 6z---- 426e62 JAMES FULLER - _ 0 NELSON KAREN A 628045 3 8 04224 NELSON ROBERT 0 1 :17 5.54 613968 04225 RABINE 577*17 387*67 JAN ET 04226 TUC�N=k M I C H E �c _____ A - -- 676*64 329*46 04227 WILLIAMS DUANE J It 055. 470o77 04228 SAS,TA MARIE L 463*29 3 31.0 4 04229 HAIDER KENNETH G 111391008 207088 04230 WEGWERTH JUDITH A 496e54 352*86 T=el. OF M AFi,EWC00 PAYROLL R EP O RT t 0 4 CERTIFICATION REGISTER CHECK DATE 05.18 -82 - -- CH NAME G ROSS PAY ----- --_- .. _ — -_ NE T _ _ - 04231 CASS WILLI c 1, 157.08 552 a2 0 42 32 FR.EBE.RG + RONAL �- 8 2 4. 0 0 4 91. Zg - - -- --- 0 42 33 HEL E Y_ RONALD _ ,/ _ 8 2 4.0 0 .- - -_-- _—. _ __. _ _5, 3 0 42 34 HOCH9A N JOSLPH H 756.80 5 01.07 - 04235 R 8 • KANE M ;CHA.L 0 42 36 KL AUS __. H_E_NKY 8320 a2 _.. _. — 4 35.0 5 _ 0 42 37 MEY GERAL O W 835097 406.23 0 4238 38 . -- PRET i� 0 8 6.0 0 6 7 2 . b 7 T NER - - J � g 0- 423. - -- �- R E INE E D W ARD E D W_.R__- A __ 8 2.4. 0 - - - -- 5 18 -' 63 - - - -_- _ -- - -- - -__ 04L44 TEVLINtJR HARRY 832.82 5 0 3.10 -- - -- - - - -___- - -- 04 . 241 --- - . 0 9 81 9 5 8 9 i -- - ---- -- -- E LI AS - - - _ - -- JAMES - - G - -- 04242 - -- G A N Z E - - _ PETER __ PETER R 336000 - - -- ... 300.45 - - 0424 GEISSLER WALTER M 1 622.31 04244 T 893*5 5 8 3 2 8 _ GrESSELE JAM 04245 _ _ -. PEC 3 E N N I S _ _ _ _ _ 9 81.69 _ - _ ... - - --- - 4 94.0 _ _ -- 0426 PILLATZKE flA1�i0 J 1� 157.08 771,.89 04247 W YHAN JAMES N -- - 0 4 2 4 8 - -- - L U T Z . - __-- ---- -- _--- A l D -- ---- -- -- -- _ P _ -- _ 562o62 _ , - - -_-- 3 8 3,o87 ___ 04249 3REHEIM ROGER W 7 69.60 470.30 -_- - - - -- 0 42 50 - 575.53 D 8 887.25 ," cD SON - 0 _. - -- MUL WEE _ _ G W -- - -- __ '7 69* 6 - - _ _--_ 4 T 3 * 2 6! ___ - - -- - --- - - - 04252 N A CE AU ED WARD A 892.69 5 80.43 04253 - - 19088a - 0 0 4 5 5.0 0 _ �. LA BI ER NE S NUTESON 04254 O W E N _ GERA _.____ -- _ C _8 4 4 _ . _ - 4 8 4.6 04255 MAGDO NALO JOHN 908.80 451.31 ITY OF MAPL-EWCOU PAYKJLL KtruKl rNUt 19340o3i 8 0 CERTIFICATION REGISTER CHECK GATE 06-w18 -w82 CHECK NAME '560*26 GROSS PAY NET PAY 04256 MULVANEY DENNIS '878* 40 517*37 0.4257 Z53 BRENNER LOIS J 677o54 ► 04258 KRUMMEL- BARBARA A 27 0.40 125*14 0 42 59 ODEGARO ROBERT 0 19364*77 8.21*79 04260 6� 1*54 STAPLES PAULINE M -::�q 05 b.9 2 - . 42 61 BURKE m Y E S R 831973 437*82 04262 GERMAIN DAVID A 834.08 516071 - 40 616o81 GUSlNoA MELVIN ,! Ift 139. fl 4263 0 42 64 H AE L E Y ROLANO s 848*90 542*04 0 42 65 LEMON JEFFREY s 84* 60 8**60 148*21 04266 LIBHWkOT THOMAS 0 04267 MAIDA !MATTHEW 259oG3 21 .04268 MARUSKA MARK A 840o39 5 18 *67 F 198985 i T T. 5 ALBERT IRASCHKE 0 42 69 0 42 70 SANTA REED 831973 4 67.13 *.13 04271 SFANNBAUER MARTIN J 160e80 1 60.00 7 ­ 297.00 29T.00 A R K RICHARD E 0 42 73 WARD TROY G 294*00 294*00 04274 TAUBMAN. DOUGLAS 1 804*30 497*14 .04275 G 328*62 251*86 W ARD ROY 04276 GREW JANET m 684*92 435 *71 0 42 77 SOUTTER CHRISTINE 684092 463*39 04278 711*23 236*34 C H L t Bl"..' C K JUDY m 04279 OLSON GEOFFREY w 19340o3i 8 0 04280 EKSTRAN 0 THOMAS G 932.83 '560*26 Y OF MAfi�. WCOO PAYROLL REPORT CHECK DATE 06- 1.8 -82 CERTIFICATION REGISTER H E � K M E NAM GROSS P A Y __ - - ---- -- NET PAY _ 04281 JOHNSON RANDA LL L 932.$3 578.03 0 42 82 OSTROM MARJORI E 1,1 33.54 6 90 .48 0 42 83 J W E N I G ER ROBERT _ -- _ -- 8 5 7.5 4 - _ _�4 8 2 . 7 CHECK REGISTER TOTALS 14 55,299.57 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1380 FROST AVENUE 7704500 MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109 New LICENSE Renewal APPLICATION FO License Fee A010 �1AP� U.,*) ddren 4 A, hereb appl for a license for the term of One Year In t he Cit of Maplewood, Count o Ramse State of Minnesotan' B. Business Add1r*ss,_;ZS7G':?` — Phone No 14 8;z - l 3 2 - Z— )(V No _-.. -. C. Have y ou been en in this Business before? y es,__ D. Whom E If a Firm or C Names and Addresses of fhe Officem dMM.-M.-ft. 4V % % Name of Fi— MCA� tc Addrou--:2-4t 3. Officer: . Rco� C�o IN14.%' Ca- L_ S ..Addreu kc.4 t � ��c� G f �c�. ca� e • 1B 4m" • L& C le r 0�-_ Of-Or LCT. bre 0 s- M M F. List all licenses currentl hold (municipal or stafe)__�_ Ls The undersi applicant makes this application pursuant to all the laws of the State of Minnesota and such rules and re as the Cit Council of the City of Maplewood ma from time to time prescribe. 19 S1 Da f Ce 9 0. �' Applicant do not RD below this line Approved for license Ais dais Rena Receipt No- - - Ins. Renewal Date S42 Approved B Actlon Enn r E f1 t 7 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager '' ,y FROM: Assistant City Engineer DATE: June 4, 1982 SUBJECT: Easement Acquisition 61 Frontage Road PROJECT NO. 80 -10 One of the MnDOT requirements, for this project, is that all rights -of -way and easements be , acquired by the City and receipts submitted along with the plans and specifications* prior to commitment of "Cooperative Agreement" funds. We are in the process of plan preparation and negotiations ati ons for the required 9 rights -of -way. An agreement has been reached with Mr. Patrick W. Goff and Mrs. Donna M. Goff, owners of Outl of A, Goff' s Mapl evi ew Addition for perpetual and temporary construction easements as follows: Permanent 29 SF @ $0.40 /SF = $11,736.00 Temporary 19 SF @ $0.095/SF = - -F -- 1,864.00 . This amount was substantiated by Mr. Winfield A. M appraisal of the value of the property. We are,therefore, requesti ng that the City Council authorized th issuance of a check i n the amount of $13,600.00 for this matter. f : L . 1p -►- COUNTY- �- ROAD -i --- C -►- -t-= =.,_ w - _ . _ . r. 0 •1� •' .'.'• �� /• `rata � T CONNOR AVE.. i - . . ;ti a I a Cl TY OF MAPLEWOOD M I N N ESOTA PROJ. 80 -10 ' T. H. 61 FRONTAGE RD. 1 FEASIBILITY STUDY UTILITIES MAP —O— -►-- Existing y ( �''•�, Sonitor Sewer ( -- 4-- --�- Beltline Interceptor Son. Sew. (MWCC) - w - - - - Existing Watermain Proposed 8" Sanitary Sewer / f " - Proposed Watermain f f f f Scale: 1" = 200' MARCH. 1982 MEMORANDUM TO City Manager FROM: y 9 Director of Public Works Action ty Counci i : SUBJECT: Assessment - Roll, Adolphus Street, Trunk Sani ta'ry Sewer Repl a Endorse - 4 cement No. 81 Modified-- . � DATE . Rej ecte d • . June 4, 1982 Date The assessment roll, for the above. referenced project -� he f bove • or the City Council 's review and herewith prove ded sc heduled � will be presented at the assessment g c edul ed on June 17, 19820 The r nt hearing with current roll has been prepared i n accor- dance • ed against all b ent City a ssessment . Policy and ass be levi .y essments are proposed to benefited properties wi thin the r • p o�ects service area. The methodology used to de • � determine i s i n accordance erm� ne the di str� buts on of unit charges al properties � 9 for i ndi vi du Stud ce w� th option No.. 2 as detailed i n t y and subsequent reports. he Feasibility Project costs were d • determined using ng the 1 ow bidder' • Sons for construction costa s proposal �Orfei and and then adding indirect costs based on cost projections since the actual costs are unknown at this time. Additi the project above the amount bid casts to i by th e contractor are i ma ted as foll construction contingencies at performed b lo° r work. St. / � c onstructi on costs for Y Paul Water Utilitie i ties at 4.85% o Legal and Easement Acquisition si ti Engineering ng at 28.4/ q on at 4.27%. The proposed assessment ment rates compare favorabl to the he time of Public Hearing. Y rates estimated at ASSESSMENT RATES Description Assessment Public Hearin Hearin Sanitary Sewer Trunk ` Sanitary Sewer Lateral X296.50 /unit $375. $ 18.20 /FF $ 18, 20 /FF Assessment costs to a typical single - family residence is $296.50. mb RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL _ WHEREAS, pursu to ro er notice . f p p ce duly given as required by law the City Council has met and heard and passed upon y p p all objections to the proposed asses- sment for the reconstruction of trunk sanitary Clerk y sewer as .described in the files of the City y as No. 81 -4, and has amended such p ropos ed as it deems just, p p ed assessment NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, as amended - � a copy of which � s attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute • ..,assessment against the t�tute the special . included is hereby 9 e 1 ands named therein and each tract of land found to b therein e benefited ted by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against ' g nst it. 2. Such assessment for trunk sanitary eq y • s ewer reconstruction shall be payabl in q annual installments lments extends ng over eriod of 19 p years, • the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday � n � . y January, 1983, and shall bear interest at the rate of Thirteen (13) percent per annum from September 10, 1982. To the first installment aliment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from September 10 19 b s 82 until December 31, 1982. To each subsequent sequent installment when due shall be added interest f one year on all unpaid installments, or 3. It is hereby declared to be the intents - on of the Council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this al funds b s improvement paid for from municipal p y levying ng additional assessments, on notice an hea as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon an properties g p y p pe ties abutting on the improve- ment but not herein assessed for the improvement when h • ro � changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 4. To the extent that this improvement be • p benefits nonabutti ng properties which may be served by the improvement when one or m • ore later extensions ons or improvements are made, but which are n • of herein assessed therefore, �t is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council, ' c 1, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the Ci . ty by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for an of such extension or improvements, y later 5. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified ti fi ed dupl i cafe of this assessment - to the County Auditor to be extended on the r • and p operty tax lists of the County, such assessments shall be collected and aid ' P over i n the same manner as other muni taxes . _ " Ai NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of Ma auditorium of the Gladstone Community Education Center' Maplewood, Minnesota, will meet in the , Frost Avenue and Manton Street, Maplewood, Minnesota, at 7:00 P.M. on June 17, 1982 to hear all persons concernin the adoption of the assessment roll for Public Im rovement P g Trunk Sanitary Sewer Replacement, and to adopt the ro�ect No. 81 -4, Adolphus Street This hearing is scheduled pursuant to Minnesota S assessment roll as presented or amended. as herein described is on file in the office o s Chapter 429. The assessment roll f the C Citity Clerk. - Area to be assessed: That area generally bounded by T.H. 36 on the north, Edgerton Street on the ea st, Beaumont Street on the west and Larpenteur Avenue on the south. All persons who .wish to be heard, or to object ' their cases at this hearing, either orally � t with reference to this matter may present y or in objection signed by .the affected n waiting No appeal- may be taken as to the amount of any assessment adopted unless s owner is filed with the City Clerk riot w P to the assessment hearing or Property siding officer at the hearing. 9 presented to the pre - An owner may appeal an assessment to District Cour by serving notice of the appeal or or upon the Ma t pursuant to M.S.A. Section 429.081 Y City Clerk of the City of Maplewood within thirty (30) days after the adoption of the ass District Court within ten ('10) days after servGSment and by filing such notice with the e upon the Mayor or City Clerk. Under provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Secti discretion, defer the payment of assessment n 435.193 to 435.195 the City may, at its is for a years of age or older for whom it would b any homestead property owned b a person 65 a hardship to make the a en a e for applying for such deferment are available from the City Clerk. Dated this 20th day of May, 1982• Lucil E. Aurelius City City of Maplewood, Minnesota Clerk Trunk Sanitary Sewer Units @ $296.50 per unit Sanitary Sewer Front Feet @ $18.20 per front foot $ YOUR TOTAL ASSESSMENT $ Your assessment may be paid without interest from Ju the City Hall, 1380 Frost Avenue, Maplewood, Minnes 18, 1982 to September 10, 1982 at . This is an important hearing because this is our 1 of this assessment which affects pro If ast opportunity to be heard on the matter anent, please call the Engineerin yDerar property. .You have any questions regarding his ass 9 p tment at 770 - 4550 or the City Clerk at 770 - 4500, ess Publ'i s h- -May 26. 1982 and June 2, 1982 Maplewood Review r ASSESSMENT COMPUTATIONS ADOLPHUS. STREET TRUNK SANITARY SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT NO. 81 -4 JUNE 10 1982 PROJECT COSTS Construction Cost Engineering Easements and Legal TOTAL PROJECT COST ASSESSMENT RATES AND COST RECOVERY Sanitary Sewer Trunk - 1043 units @ $296.50 /unit Lateral - 250 FF @ $18.20 /FF TOTAL COST RECOVERY THROUGH ASSESSMENT $23.6 67,156.85 10,014.39 $313 1309.249--;n X313. / vv. 5U / s 11 t 7Z 7/ 7 G7 . re f , .• s ",/1 A ICJ - -- --.-. 1 1 /oz .tai /OD 99 98 1G _ I c 4 _. — I • _ q t f ch /Zf AV g� y 7 _J `y 1 .� IIAO 1 o l I - t .tai' o z J DIE iM 1 f , '9392 9� •: %rte � .,. , . — -7k ,C ` 10 7 i t ' I � 1 z.� ok C AD 0 ro '000, loo oo- Vi ll. --v / l d f / .� •• ��• � 1 t op , IT •� � 1 / r 1 � 4 I i A N L I L-j r N • � 1 i 1 1 ' lG1 � I fy v, 1 94 I, L =''AN I - el 1 V r � T s 1 .mod 18 .Z9Q .Z�f �Z�G py X99 ;, 1 :op � 9S , • . - r,. -•� „'e a' a •' -�e• e,rs .o.. < 3 s f � , �• xisj -} 4:r /� ♦ 'L' + r. j -... - J7 (c , • j ti i • • 4; I 4 QD (�R) 5 Ll El= 3111 a i CirY OF �• 110 10 D f7 �t IS.If jO 7f li 1! r C7 ZP7- A4 A R 1 _ 04 00 i .rri 1 3 e L — L M 0 N4 a A4 7 L ` — �-- S 6 7 100 046 - - — s— .. a e .:. to TS y • `. w ` f T t I 461 ` r, , • n T J ev —mot L L \• �r �� -_ , I � '� � 4 .-IF X11 P!_E wG QD � �• � y t. cz r ! " r 1 67 7O _ t 1 Sam 14 p7 'L 1 ,�� �c r � .. •. y - 77 rl 1 14 X33' t, `may _.•. - _ 1 � � � -^ ` 1 , - • _� •..1 -� ..-_► .-. `� i_ +- �O � 11 _ .._ _ ._. � to r • � 1 1 , s t / + -.,, �.� � ^. _ ( �. . ly --Iw -..._ � � � Ii • ` �,- ..._ J � -� 1�� .�,�` � ;!�- � ... Ian, � .t -�9�. -� ' !l Ir 1 z - LLJ 1 7 _ � � _ _ .� __� 1 t � � , � _•_. v --1 ," 9 � °. � � A � � . ' � � �. � 3 � I Iw ...IR 4 rfit9i3♦ - ... ►,.._„ - , ` ' _ r �O p ; O ' Ip , 3..� la. ' 4. ar 3a' i t r , - LHORCH or JEROME + a m •. lo tr ^noel: I •i. ` ' J ' iro i — A li ' +p 253.E _ to 3 ' > • i 70 a► 1 _ _ _ ._ cmO f0 >1 111 � � - � ♦.1$ , 4 T L- fit I rl t S7 PAUL CEMETERY F' A A 1 � ~ n 4 .OGac - v. !_5+< 'c I� �C. f • �� 6S3 s6 �c _ - _ fig It � • t 1 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF ►^, ! ^'F r. \ �� LATTER D/iY SAINTS 04 OAS w 3c r JS � � � 1 . � / r �a. a • � G9 � � f , ` - `� � X00 �'' `.. •a �? ^. Tom_ �Y o L.4L ___3 o/ •+Dl O 7 `� -• O �� ' t ?- .1 7 l Z ..e TZ r ^ �O a o '� ^._ n �o•. v t oe 8 auc. ; O4se•- lot nr0 G4 mot. ► .� ��7" p� ya • ISO 8 N Z >, '_gip ! :.int . ► - _ , d ^ .n ! A .0 r en ``` TIN `�_ +s t •f ? Z3 r .,, 1 r Al .Y •� , � Zoe . `O� - 1" r 4-7 9L 1 1Z ��3 �4 9S �lGo �G 9L2 J �.� _ { Y LA A V E . A j •. a S, 7 Sn t oo P-75 ,s ,: ; . s L 1 '1 t - �.l1' !�_ <i.n � � �'•^ S { v�•. V �1 A Q D, '' ' � 1 . 3 4 r 1 I ! 0-1 L ( - - -4- -- V c � 2 4E)� + I 1 �I�1 (. � .► I I I • _ ��' { `SG¢ -• (',� -- 4� n 7 co 15 7 T �� �► � �` z '� a q S ^ f 9 apt '{C QD -4- _ �4 EGG pQ' �' s• , ,� ° r. LAURIE ROAD —_ + —__ o fir° -�' 2 2 33 TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH ^ 040 Q�) �- S37 N 1 90 at . 72 { v d , as or IL co uj cr i a _ v a V ZJ IN I T - - 2ti35 30R —� Q Or A- i- p A IL Fs A R I- -,.s a p A PARR J) :1 p A F E' L J.gi i..Iz. a V r PARCEL CEL $296a 5P TOT1"AW, P ARCEL 7 1 UHTT A T $29 $29 i 50 TOT ASO'KT t PARCEL 76 I UNIT AT $2 56 PgRCEL 77 P $29685@ UKT S PARCEL 7 cgs i U ?a. 9 s L PAPS EL I UNIT AT $ 296,50 $296. M TOO A55SMT s PAR .EL 80 If I Uf3iT ' f i $ii rte PARCEL 81 I U ,I AT PAS =DEL 8 PARr`lrq_'-'EL- 8-j ! ti 3 r L PARCEL 84 I Mi I T Sft9 cr Tr.T PARCEL 85 U T T r• T V9 r N PARCEL 86 1 UHTT NT VAP rr. s�JL {s @ }296 58 TOTa t S` SZS 9 . PARCEL 8 1 UH T AT $ 296 i % $290"., PARCEL 88 I UN AT $ice. M. Cr $296a50 TUTs�CCMTs PARCEL 89 1 UN IT . �^ •._. r E f 9 0 - T • T �� ' r� I PARCEL 91 I UNIT i L9ii a �.� TA t i PARCEL 9 1 UNIT AT $296 s rg S2% TOT, SSMI'i PARCEL 93 1 UN T PT $296,50 5296 a 58 TAT � f a PARCEL. 94 I UN I T AT 225? a r. $296 TOL A SSMT s 1 PARCEL 95 1 UN A q � .�t'a s $296 5'P i StTi ASIS. f� a i PARCEL I UHTT AT $ 9�'. rf_= $296,50 TO To )SK c r i PAR" — EL 9 I s•' T tt r� �� �r `- iT *1 t fiJtss i L w a 58 TO A STMT t 1}L: f ! s I PARCEL 98 1 UN 3 f t i �i • tf t :.=i:= ! r {VT P'ARC L_ 9 • f �t st r..♦ r { i i bsip PARCEL. 100 1 UN' " $ ^ ^p rr _ 1 { "I s v 25 L• i RE . PaAR'% — EL_ 1 LINT r`s 29f� T �f T� f s Ti Z v N • PARCEL 1 0 ' i UF T r = :C; PARCEL_ 1�� • UNIT AT $2 �+ h r�. + S296 TG # a t'� SSMII T t PARCEL 104 1 a Um l i AT $'96 s �r- 5296. 5+8' t DT. ASSMT a C. - _ - X29. -s` — iRow PARC=EL 1 C­_ 1. UST V $29615 MO. @ Tr-fl.' aASSW M;3. PARCEL 10~ I UN $296 50 r 1 PARCEL 108 I UNIT! AT $2 969 5t, $296 s 59 3 T i �Lf •! i PARCEL 109 ^lr { h t9 'a 50 is PARCEL. 11 1 UNIT f , situ ' V29 TOT, ASSMI t PARCEL 11 $296 T T. RaT PARCEL. 1 1 UH T TY t =e' 5 of s ASPM P'ARCEL. f 1 I UNI AT $r u r UNI - .•tsti r $296,5@ TO T t p.0 S T. PARCEL 1 14 "NTT AT V%M @ $296 a 50 i s M�f PARCEL 11 i �li'f 1T 12969516 TOT. As.7S:VI t . PARCEL. 1 16 1 UNIT AT $ S�1 50 T3TA Sts(i to 'PAPCEL 117 1 UHTT r-- $29 r t i 04 = Y all PARCEL 118 s ' IT t PARCEL 11'9 ITT r. -► r' #`. J T0 Ta A:Ts�.e T s P'APEE f ,= 0 i ? L T 4296s TLTa A 0 HFtj s =' CEL. 1 E L_ 1 l" i fiS1s t. T CT q AS.Sl r . ;PARCEL 1� I UH AT * 29t a O 29 p T lJ 1 R +.i " . PARCEL 124 r1 ll A I ��gtia 58 ASSMS i r 'P'AR'CEL. , 1 25 1 UN I T nT 2Q. 5 PARCEL- 12E. iTT �!T �+} r rr U l t*.. i9va t{ { g T Fi z I �a. i�i nT T �� ivft�fi PARCEL 1 7 i V T♦ R P! I III!. : f- r Wa 5r 1 2.96 a :t L• TWL i lk f s PARCEL 122 Ti MI {'� r C ? ,T ti �}� = T PARCEL 1 9 ti+. + t ��9�'•,��s Tir�Tar•LS�'�Ta PARCEL 1730 t UK T T ; • T * ^F r. t29� 5@ T0T AS Y- Li a t}L 2 = I PARCEL_ 1.281 { U HTT t1 • s! •+ r r {� �� i �: a+`n � i { ±t � s. =s i s PARCEL 1 1 U Ir K. T H! f -Sh s rTi 1$ 2 9 6-50 T'` ; . Ai _K i_ PAPS -E f t UNI PT r t r :.% r. $2 6, i TOT, A+ ' Q# T i i PARCEL 134 1 U�Ii &lT fi � s ifs• P A HR E L 1 3--1 I UTT r T t � = �� �j . S i sL J i:' a s=� L= � s T'f � ��± t PARCEL. 1Lr= 1 UN I T P.' $ 296 a Cirz 29b.5E. T i, t i T ! 4 f � PAR- .... f 1 i31 _ �. PAPCEL 4 UNTTc A T $ 'IQ & T s ASSN 7: P A R C E L., c2' 0 AT $1291 bp a 5Z. 9 UNITS $2661 aP TUT ASE347a PARCEL 204 8 UNIT'S AT $29till'i I $2, 72. TOLASSMIG PARCEL 2055 5 UNITS $621H, 5e $1482,5e Tu^T*A',',%%SMTl 8 .PARCEL 206 lrlr$l 4 Wit-, AT $219615-61 PARCEL 207 UN"' AT I '! i-il W I..; $296 8 vi 0 T 0 a A zr:.,eF Klpf's PARCEL 20-P _ UN CN !, I;r-. I K $%4f R Tl%T A ^j%p-r PARCEL j. UN ;4 H: t CZR 'woT, Zr ?%VT + 2 96, a i - is I f 4:-,s Z. - - I a PARCEL --2110 I MIL I $296,59 TOT AS'S"M71'r P A R E LL 2 -1 I UHTT nT *Or4 re- PARCEL 2 122- T` CT $; �^r 62 T I .4 4 UN TT nT s2 i 4 p f- E-1 W a w S n- T O T s A e-: S PARCEL 21 t 17. 9 6 5 T 01' A .ALCM - PARCEL 21 !_5' U N I T r.; I U HI T rh' ri $2. 9 6* 8 5, $296.50 T I OT , A S 0-: 1 PARCE L &2l 16 1 US TT & I A " 2 9 5 J. ?I �l F T $296 a 50 TOT, A.0 b;.. 3 PARCEL .2 17 1 UNIT niZolp Vs.96j-5P_;- i. ff $61-196. 51E� JARCEL 2 JKIT AT $296s5►-? T O PARCEL 219 i UN!.T Al $296450 5296.50 TOT ASSK7, PARCEL 220 1 UHT A T T $296.5er UHT a Sin-6s59 TOLASSHT. PARCEL 221 1 UNIT AT $296a5C $29 66 = .5C TOT. ASSMT a P C E L 2.2 I UNIT PT V9't 5@ $29 oo. 50 TOT A'SKT P A R Q E L 2 :--' - 2 I UHT_ AT *'P� IN #&I- Va% TD T, AS �"* t b.: i a P 2:2-6 4 I UN V Q s2 9 a 5 P_ T 0 Ts . A 3 S K "ar P A vE' L 22 2 _51 I 1 UK S� C 5 TnT, g` SKT 296. 1 U I H 1.2 P A R CEL 2--s' 2-2t= I UXTT nT PARCEL 22§ ^lr cX 't p W-^ "T r U� P A P C E L 2&2:1 Ga- 00 UWTT-c q 2. � &T $ - 3 t. M s 5 9 1310 AR PARCEL 2.29 H! J* S 8 8 9 5 e- Ti Of 1 . W3 s M wl" PARCEL 2301 i UNT- $ S^ 6 ,c ; p $ rt g I Sri , T ivr,nr- i% J el PARCEL 231 I UN IT T ` A: $%* 50 . C. 0 S"296,50 TiAYir,A%cj?o%NllFv PARCEL 23 _ 3e--_* 5 V96, " &. I I :I a 4p. E L 2 Z"ft 4 P h2 50 U W Ln T a i Y. L a CA TP i- r , A s &*?- 9 6 a i v I - i `%5 T PARCEL 2 "-3 'PARCEL 2 -51 I UNIT P; $2916?11 1 UN;T A T $296.59 s• i is arils PARCEL 2,36 IFARCEL 2 J. I UN AT $29ba-j 11 UNIT �" � 9� f OT $296*56 T I.sASSKT!ll p 4296. 50 T". A ^C N ' PARCEL 2.37 'P I 25 JL UNIT hi I URI T p CI S296,5C TIOTAISSMil's T J SK P A R.0 E L 238 !PARCEL 2514, I UNIT AT If 4 $29t."It-, UNIT A T S SQ r r? T 'r p Sn6sj 101 1 1. $6296 50 T ru" 71', R S S M" • PARCEL 2 3 1-9. PARCEL 2-22 5� C . I U81"Ir AT $221S36"guirl ? - I UNIT AT $`..56 96.50 TOTASSN'is 2, b j G Ta i ' sASSK -T PARCEL 240 PARCEL 256 1. I U"IT F t hri T s"!r7`6, 5 E� I UHTT AT - B $29 b, 50 T01 A S T s �``✓ s t3 T =.t I s !t l i s P E L 4 .1 41 iP-ARC't"___L 25- 7 1 1 UK IT AT I UNTT V". 50 9 C0 T 0 T • A 'S SM'l% Le PARCEL 242 PARCEL 2258 I UHTT AT: $29h' I I UNIT $r- 5` C2. r 6 i 5 8 lwit Ii a 34 -s l ­ P A R C E L 2 4 PARCEL 25 '1 p 41 UNIT AT $29t, 5 �_D 1 UN."'T PT VC.",50 O T P %r Cr-zKT $42 9 6 a 5 0 T 0 i , I a PARCEL 244 PARCEL 260 11, Ir 1 U M t UN ;,T 21 9F 15 , 5 0 i. 4 s nT.ASSN: IG PARCEL 24._! PARCEL 2t*r--'. I UFTT rin r 4% UNT A lp V ^�l s r o 482 Qr 6 5 Olf 1 0 T s Klr f ��� L of T r T . Awt� M.'r, PARCEL 246 P 1 t 1 I IL • 1 Ll J hI T T r- 'r P C: MlojrsM I Lfi LtL. -st }i TnT CA TP i- r , A s &*?- 9 6 a i v I - i `%5 T PARCEL 247` P C Ems.. 2 62. I UHT*P AT ts a w I UN T T P ; C"' P, 5n . 4, 0 L. 2 T 0 AS36'* M T' 53 T OFT, . A S S` XT PARCEL 248 PARCEL -,%64 1 UH A7 $ '7W C:­ DiC a -T - $ )q $296250 T 0 T • A P*,*" C T S42 9 6 9 5 1 a PARCEL 24-___ _•EL 265 I UH T T QT $219M.56- 50 i T. A'S'a" Ml'. PARC •3� I Ufi?' AT S;�9' • $444', `_+ T C T s ASS �t - a PARCEL 3�:1 t el $41 5l s Vk OL AW is PARC LPL a,.. 1 UN A i $2.9 s PARCEL -3 3 1 W All $?r a % $29b j . e Tu T . A SS! T • PARCEL 3 3 4 UN IT .F PARCEL 3315 1 UNIT kT firma} V96.50 T OL !S s PARCEL 336' 1 UH T T "T V rr�} s r -P $296 a 5JE! TUT a AS'S M' a PARCEL �. it t UNIT eT i U I A �iiJ� +ILIL• TL =f st��itiii s PARCEL 338 i UN'T AT $29', r.: � Fife # 2-9 5 T0,1 A i' YT PARCEL 3 ±Si �! I =TT T 296 ._ =p ' ;;} I a A S X :5 , 7 i PAR: EL 3"40 # t W TT r-T $ a ro 1. i c y.. { i. � : s �f �' 4 49b s 5 F L s APS.K77 s PAP ; = E 34 i U NIT nT :.r. . p = T i � L �� L L � $ i.9 6a5 % � �: a PARCEL 34 i U NIT ^T 19 Ct PAPC EL 343 I UHT i3'' $1,1% 4 296 8 t TOT T:3>1 - a PAR. EL. X44 I uh , T LT AT $ 5 $ 296 s !rP ToT s ASSrT a .PARCEL 345 I UN 1 ST VD61150 $29 r @ TOT 9 ASSMT 6 "REEL - T A $.. . . _. _. i or PARCEL 34? I UH.T Al' $296.5(. $296 s 56 TD f s ASS # s PARCEL 348 U AT $29 1 0 3 s 5g � r C TgT s A %.$ i PARCEL 349 1 UN i T AT $2%.50 PAS: MEL 350 UN i; " S296.50 1 �► r �T r T $2 bi5@ iO : s!'SSMi s 1 i PARCEL .`51 I l"' n ' 9 Cis 1 T-1 ! A ! T $i t f L t L. PARCEL 35 I UN i' T s`_ i ` irl T [ "r s i - A MT s 4 s PARCEL 35 --.A l` IT-' PT r}r p . r- #i J•ry T A C "' PARCEL_ 25L 54 UlT T_ t =� }r $1 �! :: r Tn r n T t o j?-. s. PARCEL ,15 Ul • i:g s rt , ! • A S yT s PARC=EL 35t= =TT AT ry. C:t a►i sLf IL'i s ctittiti� ° s PAR C. EL 3 57 s je t =T I'+ �f F = �. �r j�s t r. f. 1 �. s L i cl t u s ►7 ti: � + . l : PARC-1EL. 7.35 5 L t 11 Fi A i $2 8 9 .L T t a a PARC 5 1 UN IT AT�. $L tt a Sp ' V a ACv`' PVT PARCEL 360 1 UNIT "T $2} €{ L.96,50 TOTASS*Vis i � r corip MEL 36 = 29E . 5 PARCEL 3.t 1 UNIT A $296 s rL t2.9 6 •50 TO; s ASSN' • PARCEL 36 -.f.. 1 UNIT AT • t $296,50 T f, ASSNT i PARCEL 3t- r.T 6 9 50 I UNIT M i s $ r 9 0 t up Is PARCEL 3t I UNIT Q?T $296 $296.50 "I' DT a 5571' s PARC=EL. 366 I UN " T AT $2q s � r2 �= }}t, r r? Ti•: �} i r• # t. b a Li z # I T S !'f " S K s PARCEL 3� ►' { i i i 1'� s s, 0 1 b o Z. $ 9 6 a Lt 0 T ui! a tits:::, s PARCEL 3t U NIT 'TT 'T C • 11 !t ! $ Its a �t 0 r4r.r C{� 01 A I- T' C29s • 5 �_m s i PARCEL I UNIT AT S 29 s r�k� T+�t F sv s t PARCEL 3 2 1 L t'! y � - .T r • 1 U NIT i A e ��..• �: s ti.FFi 1 $29 r ' " A n T f _ PARCEL 3 l ea i f hi $ '} q C �. T jj����}} a.. t'a 0 TlT!at`SMTt PAS' ='.� - L ?a_ 4 f �� T T �► r = {. r C l itiilZ . a. $i -9U.'a 1� 6 C r T �"4 T {� T 'Fs L iui sT1�..f e a PARCEL ,= t; 1 UK7T t:T $ a 1p ��t- = T A l" ' M T 2 f50 " n i �t aL: PARCEL 3�4 S r rr :1 rr. T j T pc' 1z'�ij- itJ ajt ; w f ! L'L IS PARCEL � Ili t A : 1 2 � , 6 Cr: + =T .► �t t `a ti#t i'ia a PARCEL 3 6 I s UK: AT 329 -i 5A $296.5F TU' . A,` KT a PARCEL. 3 f 1 I UNIT !!T nr� Cr. � i i 4 & 1 $ i..f 6 a 4 a. 1 *2S PARCEL 379 I#:2.t S J T T � T. T $296, 5(i + OT ASSM# PARCEL '.?E0 i — I AH 1 1 AT $2 9' s 59 $296,50 T A ? "'S F PARCEL* 381 I UK i T AT to 50 PARCEL 1 UNIT AT $29",` $2 W T T . Aw� f iT a PARCEL 313 I UHTT AT $296 T $ iL i • s.L : s PARCEL 384 A U iT mI a :' '� ' � r =�s. Tr = T rtirti�sT $ 296. L� rF� ji � i a Ast�l i s PAR EL s 8� f'• = T : rt t r=t hit 296 i 50 i .1w s tic ii z s PARCEL 38t'& 2 UNI TS A "a C;t $59 i ' -F 1 a PAR C EL 3E= I' TT I OF *1 ? f: �i.�h r�: $ 1 1 - 1 96 s L= = = -A :iSI : ? s PARCEL 388 I Uh i T H. ,t c'p? t ,tr Kt P A R C ' & , = — ' L f5:3a6 it PARCE } 3"90 =rr 5?2' Tr.T . S'I ,rT T A r E L 39. .1 # U N T' T T = r i iti 5—. PARCEL 3 0 T *. SL -it=s __L _ i 51 T : t :=T.ASs 7• j 1..1 =' .► L. 3 5 4 /RT A� • C•r - : M AO SM', PA R C E L t. .... JR- M -80 MASS! r VH T T1 T A R �• E L. 4 - 7 " t. PARC r z CEL 4 -4 � � _ �'j t ifs T � � p �0 ff � �'} i is Af%srr � { T i1 sw i V T ._� = rtt j !"S RC GL 50 �:; t.r +� �.� sf� s + i � F. L tii f s�'L' E ! . !'! = C L� i- T Cat a L _• , �F: PARCEL 460 PA RCEL 476 97 VNITS AT $29' PARCEL as • 80 T i . ASS1 s a # : {�'j j'� ,1 UNIT A? $295 P ARCEL ,.� s ` i ii 0L' T a ASST s s i UN AT # J [ Q T Y � ��� — t Lia r e PARCEL, 6-50 iC #•ANCn a r� 46 - a J i AGSM i A PARCEL AT $29t a r t T rr r � ! t � 1 !•_ A '�} C E 4 93 PARCEL 509 T UN IT UN . TT S296 s TO RSSMTs i *' C i f IV ��* ti T s..tt ! a �. � .T PAR 4 6 2 e Tf ± C f :If=s � PARC 4 i� L i fi jT t ate# # '�* PT S' 4 ) 96,50 PAR 49 L i.= T ~i.T j + ri i T �! T J . s 4 P A� C E L t� s z 0 T I a Z) a �•t C�j T C '' i UN: I r �� %8 6 !! :T� j •t !iJi* vim:.it $ 296 -50 TOT. �' 1i� j 4 3'f fC•� a P ARCEL I . A�t,.1.. t t 5296. 50 Tu f { =rT 4 �L� L PA .., � i ti sf z f f I . q J, ii � !t�� 49 ii � A _ � r C T OT. �i �= i 1 �I�� a 5 j � ; s?T rT PARCE - r � fS � ril ti. i f.f i t � irttt• L =i t f s r1 r 5 j T r T i• _ a s: [� � �� = s Rvti. =� ; , � :V9 C i T ffT t � n r t �� �{� �. 5 a L T' i A� _ PARCEL 464 PAR. _--� { 1 A #::�s� ' T- A =�_ AREEL 4 ..�� >c t j :i i ,. PARCEL %_6 T � { sL ! = 3 a ff i :� Crs T T i'if' . i �T AT c: t 5� .. A-9 �`� i e a AsiLZi iIi fr `.TtLts r� i�TaSii i .r _ $29t= 58 T ASS t t loft A T -C� p PARCEL 49 UNT Z tiF a a� TOT, . T r � r i- _ t ,.1C: i T T 1' - c P A R C E f� 5 1 L _ s =s :! a t�a.� s =! j i t ,r i s ti. T ♦T T r C s PA jr tie tfssi: f s s� Cra +} iiT =►r to �- 466 _ � rVts �is%K s P 4 8' rs I t U NIT �• r I; � � L.. T awe i UNI AF �:.S�_�SF. IT�*- �T ..��_� PARCEL 4Q! : j LV �T r T +* + �LJS. ti f � *�� fT r zt� �- r A Rt # 5 T 0 1 % >*isrt� :fit +��- =f 'r T`�`!�S'! E : f a�.�r =sL Ft:, tTL.r:!i � 5 T OT '?i ti •- iIfTT e OT CC -r i ti P ARCEL s a } UNT T r - _ 3 i Ti : j I UV; ' ifar PARE 4 � _ = s �. � � T t= � , -r �j Z v tit UH T T r T 4 P A R �.�.- E 1 51%-& a. r t l � i • n t r? : t s J _ Trl !ti -. �.ie : i ! �' i i J s � r� f * L• • a :1 i t� f sal T .. UK i T�r= 4 r = Y i iJ�tT • i = i =a �f ;ma PARCEL 468 PARCEL 484 52; T 03 $59L t L• T !• A 1 1 t r ~ TO •► T j �_ I t A s t C ir'. ARCEL 516 $ 2 9f . . j y,s ` 1 L• i i ITT • $29 ♦itil T1 fAL = Yi: S t i :1i1� y� T� }! t � T 0' P t , ♦ t � - PARCEL 4 • =1 I T A tn • T� = c r r = �t ■ i i. ';i T •f4i tsiS1�, i UN TT rf�• r { PARr -' 501 -7 s V i 9 T OT �'€' r v T �{,► T a. s •! �f T'�!� T r�, r. •i E • st r l .. , t-296 5 j r s = 's �� = L f s` i • a rt 5e. VfI ♦ PT 'il�Fi f � C TOT C = = - �i . ,� a ..�' PARCEL 3 L I• ����f r C; T .n +. PAR. C-El 4 - UHT A. � i =t5 : UHTT nT - r :� PAS' -EL 50 V T A _,. ,,, r s vM' ; _ r _ PARCEL 51 • _ e s 1�... • 1" C : '� ''f'R!�r a.. � � �_� { La ��a! s ti i �j i s ii i• s * = j a T .♦�- r t L� =' } i r e. T ;T + - C. Orr. { _ PAR EL 1 P A R C. E L 5 fB -7 r ` � L. Gs ti' IT C � _ T �} T a #��,, AT 2. a i � L f a I . �3s�f .. , Vi1! - i� i `96, 5 ; $14' T om_ rC T - ♦ =j •-��. I : ii�s PARCEL 488 t to I UNIT v'�j � ' T - } � PA ��� �rr rr [ i R� �• { 5 �} �s t �L�id �/f T ♦ C � { L =' +Tl 1�T f��tia 5� � jjjT �,eT� .♦, t r r - • � FL C- EL � s� tf a a ! • i'[�. Sr i = ± $59-2 s ��� TOT ���lt i i ViI: t L A � ��� }� s L {� F'� rT ' � ,� T f SRKT i * 4 N 47 _ _ . PARCEL 4' eiRCEL 507 PARCEL 5_ 2 1 • L _ $296 Ce. T AT A� v .. .• a � i ��.'� f�' • CPT- ■ A. RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLLS WHEREAS, the City Clerk and City E figures for Project - Engineer have presented the final Project No. 81-6 Shade Tree D' isease Control Pro ram NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF Clerk MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the City y k and City Engineer shall forthw' specially a 11 � th calculate the proper amount to be • P y assessed for such improvement a ai every assessable lot, piece or arcel 9 nst - p of 1 and abutting on the streets affected - without regard to cash valuation • shall fi l e a co of such � as • prove ded by law, and they copy proposed assessment � n .the C� t ' inspection. y office for .FURTHER, the Clerk shall u - up on c ompleti on on of such proposed assessmen notify the Council thereof, t RESOLUTION ORDERING ASSESSMENT SSMENT ROLL HEARING - WHEREAS, the Clerk erk and the Engineer P�'epared' an as essmen have, at the direct _ t roll for Protect fJo of the Council, og ram 81 -6 Shade Tree Di Contro] pr and the s Dis aid assessment r - roll �s on file in the e office.of the Cit Cl r . NOW, THEREFORE, y k, EFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL • OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: A hearing n 1 • s 9 ha 11 be held on th 22nd day of Jul .Hall at 7:00 198 - P .M, to pass u on Y� 2, at the City such time and place P such proposed assessment • p a all per -sons ownin r and at improvement w� 1 ] be 9 property operty affected b given an Opportunity-to y such to such assessment, be heard with th ref erence 20 The Ci Clerk i - s hereby directed to ca • on the proposed assessment use a notice of the heari at leas nt to be published in ng t two weeks prior tot the official .newspap . he hearing, and to mail all property affected 1 n0 t� CeS to the owners of by said assessment. 3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, ' general nature of the i time, and place of hear' that the p ropose d improvement the area proposed heari p p ed assessment roll is . p P to be assessed, .written or oral ob jec on f� 1 e wi th the Clerk a ti ons will be cons i der and that - ed. NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN t C Council of Will me that the Ci • et in the Council Chambers Maplewood, Minnesota , m > n the Municipal Build* Avenue at 7:00 n P . on July 22, 1982 to h g at 1380 Frost ar all Persons concerning the • Public Improvement Pro g e adopts on o f the assessment roll for Disease Control .Pro ram sect No. 81 -6, Shade amended. 9 and to adopt the assess p Tree nded. Thy s heari n � s scheduled assessment roll as presented or a The eduled pursuant to Minn e assessment roll as herein Minnesota Statutes Chapter the City Clerk, described i s on file i n Office of he off� _ Area to be assessed is within th . Maplewood, the e corporate limits • is of the Ci of All persons who wish to be heard, or to ob matter may e y present they r cases at � • ther orall ct with reference to this No appeal ma be th � s hearing ng , � e � • Y taken as to the amount 1Y or n writ n . .written objection signed nt of any assessment ado g igned by the affected • peed unless a Property owner � s filed ed wi t Assessment Hearn or h the Ci Clerk prior to the g presented to the res i d officer at the hearing 9 P ing An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant-to M.S.A. Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Cit days after Clerk of the City of Maplewood within thirty ( assessment and b adoption of the y filing such the notice with the District Cour y days after service upon the Mayor or City Clerk. t Within ten (10) Deferment of Assessments: Under the provisions of Minnesota �i nnesota Statutes , Section 435.193 to 435.195 the C its di sc reti C i ty may at n, defer the payment of asses- sments for any homestead s person 65 Property owned by a years of age or older for whom it woul be a hardship to ma procedures e the payments. The P ures for applying for suc h deferment are available from the City Clerk, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COU NCIL L Lucille E. Aurelius - o s City Clerk City f Maplewood, Minnesota Dated this 7th day f J Y 1Y ,1982 Publish Maplewood • p ood Review and Lj�(1 4 19 82 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLLS WHEREAS, the City Clerk and City Engineer have P resented the final figures for the improvement 79.4 English Street I mprovements South of County Road C NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MA PLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the City Clerk and City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against. ever assessable lot piece y p e or parcel of land abutting on the streets affected. without regard -to cash valuation, as provided b -1 aw and � of y •' they shall file a copy such proposed assessment i n the City office for inspecti FURTHER, the Clerk shall, upon completi of such proposed P p p assessment notify the Council thereof RESOLUTION ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING _ WHEREAS, the Clerk and the Engineer have at ' ared an assessment r � the d� rect�on of the Counci g t r r_ ' �e ' et i oll for the construction of 1 ' I mprovements south of Count Project No . 79 _4 En l and 1 y Road C ash said assessment roil is on file e I ' n the office of the Ci Clerk; .NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. A heari n shat 1 be held Ha :T5 on the 22nd day of Jul ,.1982. . Hall at , m. to ass u y , at the Ci such time p upon such proposed assessment a me and place all persons own' and at - owning Property affected by such improvement will be to s given an opportunity to be heard with such assessment. reference 2• The City Clerk is hereb directed to cause a notice • on the proposed assessment t of the hearing at 1 o be published shed i n the official east two weeks prior to the hearing, newspaper, ro r � ng � and to mail notices to the owners of all propert pe ty affected by said assessment 3. The notice of - hearing shall state the date, e t� me , and place of hearing, the improvement, the area r the general nature of that the proposed assessment proposed to be assessed,. roll i s on file e wi th the Cher en or oral objections will b k, and that written e considered, de red . NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that at the City C ouncil of Maplewood, Minnesota, 1 meet in the Council Chambers a, will Avenue � i n the Municipal pal Bu> > d� ng, at 1380 Frost at 7:15 p.m. on July. 22, 1982 to hear all persons concerning the adoption of the .assessment roll f g or Public c Improvement No. 79 -4, Engl i sh Road 9 Str eet Improvements south of County C, to adopt the assessment roll as presented or amended. This heari n a s scheduled • Chapter 429.. 9 uled pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Cha P The assessment roll as herein describ • of the City Cl erk, described i s on file e n the office y Area to be assessed: - = From County Road C to approximately 800 feet south between Duluth Street and approximately 1300 feet eet east. All persons who wish to be heard o • present - � r to object with reference to this matter may p ent their cases at this hearing • g� eit oral or �n writ No appeal may be taken as to the amount of any assessment adopted wri tten objection. signed b the unl ess * a y affected property owner is fi with the Ci Clerk prior to the f iled Assessment Hearing or presented 'to the officer at the hearing, a An owner may appeal an assessment �- t to D ct Court pursuant-to M.S.A. Section 429 .081 by serving notice of the a ea - o PP 1 upon the Mayor or Ci Clerk City f Maplewood within thirty (30) da s f • of the Ci t y after the adoption of the assessment and by filing such notice with the - Di stri ct Court with n ten (10 days after service upon the Ma r or City Clerk. Deferment. of Assessments: Under the - provi s i ons of Minnesota Statutes, .Section 435.193 to 435.195 the City m ay, y, at its discretion, defer the payment asses- sments for any homestead property wned b Y y a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the a ments . T procedures P y he p ures for for such deferment are available from the City Clerk, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Lucille E. Aurelius - City Clerk Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota Dated this 7th day of July 1982 Publish Maplewood Review July 7, and July 14 91982 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLLS WHEREAS, the City Clerk and City Engineer have presented the final figures for the improvement 78 -20 Brookvi ew Drive Storm Sewer NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOO D, MINNESOTA that the City Clerk and City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against ever assessable lot, ie g y piece or parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard to cash val uation, as provided b la and the of y law, y shall file a copy such proposed assessment i n the City office for inspection. FURTHER, the Clerk shall, upon completion of such ro osed assessment notify P p ssment y the Council thereof. RESOLUTION ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING WHEREAS, the Clerk and the Engineer have at the direction coon of the Council, prepared an assessment, rol 1 for the construction of Pro 'ect No. 78 -2 Brookview Drive Storm Sewer 0 and the said assessment roll is on f i l e i n ' the office of the City Clerk; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY C • COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA. 1. A hearing shall be held on the 22nd day f Jul 1982 at t y y he City Hall at 7:30 p .m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time p me and , place all persons owning property affected by such improvement well- be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published in the official a news er riot newspaper, ' at least two weeks p to the hearing, , and to mail notices to the owners of all property affected by said assessment. 3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time, and 1 ace of hearing, p e ring, the general nature of the improvement, the area proposed to . be assessed, that the . p proposed assessment roll is on file with the Clerk, and that written or oral objections will be considered. NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT HEARING G NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the a City Council of Mapleood Minnesota, the Council .Chambers, in the. � ....sofa, will meet in ..Avenue at 7:30 Municipal pal at 1380 Fr p.m. on July 22, 1982 to hear a1 Frost 1 persons concerni the adop 1 for Public Improvement Pr P n of the assessment roll .Drive Storm Sewer and to ad Project No. 78 - 20, B rookvi ew ado the assessment roll as This ese nted or amended, assessmen s hears ng i s scheduled Pursuant p p to Mi nnesota . Statutes Chapter roll as herein described is P 429 The on file l e i n the office of the Cit _ y Clerk. Area to be assessed: " .- That area eneral 9 ly bounded by Century Avenue eon the East, battle Creek on the South, Ferndale Street on the West and I -94 on the North. All persons who wish t o be heard, or to object matter may j ect y present their cases at t � � with reference to this No appeal may b hi s hearing, either orally • y . e taken as to the amount 1 y or �n writing. written objection signed t of any assessment ado g igned by the affected property unless a Ci Clerk .prior to the P °perty owner � s filed ed wi t Assessment Hearn or h the officer at-the hearing, 9 presented to the res i di 9 p ng An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant.to M.S.A. Section 429.081 by serving notice of the a of the City of Maplewood within thirty pPeal upon the Mayor or City after a lerk assessment and by filing such notice with theDistrict Co Curtdwpth�n of the days after service upon the Mayor or City Clerk, ten (10) Deferment of Assessments • Under the provisions of ' nnesota Statutes, Sects �� Section 435.193 to 435.195 the Ci fy may, at discretion o n, defer the payment of asses sments for any homestead s person 65 Property owned by a years of age or older for whom i t would be a hardship p o make the _payments. The procedures for applyi n for such uch deferment are available from the City Clerk, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL L Lucille E. Aurelius - . lius Cat City of Maplewood y Clerk Minnesota Dated this 7th day of Ju ---- -- y 1 y 3,1982 Publish Maplewood Review Jul w 7, and Jul 14 ,1982 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLLS WHEREAS, the C Clerk and City Eng ineer n - - ures for im provement 9 eer have presented the f figures the improvement 78 -24 Beam Avenue west of T. H. 61 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA that the City Clerk and City Engineer shall ' amount t - • 9 11 forthw� th calculate the proper o be • specially assessed for such improvement • piece or p ovement against every assessable lot, P parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard to cash valuation, • as • provided by-law, and. they shall f i l e a copy of such proposed inspection. p p assessment � n the City office for FURTHER, the Clerk shall, upon completion notify the Council p of such proposed assessment y nci 1 1 � RESOLUTION ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING WHEREAS, the Clerk and the Engineer have at the direct ' ' ion of the Council, prepared an assessment, roll for the construction of Project No. 78 -24 Beam Avenue west of T. H. 61 and the said assessment roll is on f i l e in the office of the City Clerk, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEW OOD, MINNESOTA. 1. A hearin shall be held on the 22nd day of July, 1982, at the City Hall at :45 p .m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected b such . 9 P P y y improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing 9 on the proposed assessment to be published in the official er news a P P at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners of all property affected by said assessment. 3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time, and 1 ace of hearing, P 9, the general nature of the improvement, the area proposed to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll is on f i l e with the Clerk, and that written or oral objections w i l l be considered,* NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Ci Council of Maplewood, M i n ne s ota, wi 1 l meet , p i n the Council Chambers , i n the Muni c� pal Bus 1 di , at. 1380 Frost Avenue at 7:45 . ro. on � n g p July 22, 1982, to hear all persons concerni the adop ion of the assessment roll for Public r p l � c Imp ovement . Project ect No . 78 -24 , - Beam Avenue West of T.H. 61 and to adopt the assessment roll as amended. - presented or This hearing is scheduled pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. The assessment roll as herein P • n described is on file in the office of the City Clerk. Area to be assessed: That area bounded by County Road D on the north; Hazelwood Street on the east; a line approximately .300 feet south of Beam Avenue (extended) on the south; and the Maplewood westerly boundary between County Road D and Beam Avenue on the west (extended). All persons who wish to be heard, or to object with reference to this matter may present their cases at this hearing, either orally or in writing. No appea ma be take y y n as to the amount of any assessment adopted unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the City Clerk prior to the Assessment Hearin or resented to t he ' officer g p e presiding at the hearing. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court ursuant. M.S.A. p Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City of Ma City Clerk of the . Maplewood wit y p within thirty days after the adoption of the assessment and by fi 1 i ng such notice with the District Court within ten 10 days service upon the Mayor or Ci ty Clerk. Deferment of Assessments: Under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 435.193 to 435.195 the City may, at its discretion, defer the payment of asses - sme nts for any homestead property owned b y a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. The procedures for applying for such deferment are available from the City Clerk, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Lucille E. Aurelius _ City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota Dated this 7th day of July 9 1982 Publish Maplewood Review Jul y 7, and July 14 91982 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLLS WHEREAS, the City Clerk and City Engineer have presented the final figures for the improvement 78 -9 East Shore Drive Water Improvements NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD. MINNESOTA that the City Clerk and City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard- to -cash valuation, as- provided law, and the - - P y s y shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the City office for inspection. FURTHER, the Clerk shall , upon completion of such ro osed assessment P P notify the Council thereof, RESOLUTION ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING WHEREAS, the Clerk and the Engineer have, at the direction of the Council pOPer Improvements, ared an assessment roll for the construction of. Project No, 78 -9 East Shore Drive and the said assessment roll is on file in the office of the City y NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 22nd day of July, 1982, at the City Hall at 8.00 p .m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such. improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing g on the proposed assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and to mai.1 notices to the owners of all property affected by said assessment. 3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time, and 1 ace of hearing, n p 9, the general nature of the improvement, the area proposed to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll is on f i l e with the Clerk, and that written or oral objections w i l l be considered. --� v1 r1 �,,L�JI•ICIr 1 rILH NU NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that at the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers � � n the Municipal pal Buy 1 d� ng, at 1380 Frost Avenue at 8 :00 -p.m.. on July 22, 1982 to he - option of the assessment ro1i1 hear all persons c oncerning the . ad 9 r ad Im provements, for Public Improvement Project No. 78-9 East Shore Drive Ad Water Adele Street to 1,OD0 feet West, and to ad assessment roll as.. or amended. - opt the ass This hearing � s scheduled pur- suant to Minnesota a Statutes Chapter 429. The assessor - described is assessment roll as herein he office of the Cit on file in the Clerk. Area to be assessed: - Frost Avenue Connection, t on, between East Shore Drive and Frost Frost Avenue between En - 1i t Avenue, English Street and Keller Parkway Bridge; and East Shore Drive from Ade le 19000 West. Street to approximately feet All persons who wish to be heard or to object • resent ' sect with reference to this matter may P thei r cases at thi s hears ng, ei they oral l - ' y or � n wry ti ng. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of any assessment adopted unless a written obj ection , signed by - the affected ro Clerk prior Hearing P perty owner is Bled with the City y p to the Assessment or resented - to the ' P e pres�ding officer at the hearing, An owner may appeal an assessment to Dist strict Court pursuant . to M.S.A. Section 429-081 by serving notice of the a e • of the C'ty of Maplewood within thirty (30) PP al upon the Mayor or City Cl erk . . days y a fter ter the adoption of the assessment and by f� l i ng such notice w the District ' Court within n ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or City Cl y y rk. Deferment of Assessments: Under the rovi s i o ' p ns of Minnesota Statutes, Section 435.193 to 435.195 the City may, at i ts di y discretio defer the payment of asses- sments for any homestead property owned b p erson 65 y a p years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the - payments. The procedures for applying for such deferment are available from from the City Clerk, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk City f M - y y M aplewood, Minnesota Dated this 7th day of July 1982 Publish Maplewood Review July 7, and ly]y 14 301982 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLLS WHEREAS, the City Clerk and City Engineer have presented the final figures for the improvement .80 -14 Keller Parkway Sanitary Sewer NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA that the City Clerk and City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and they shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the City office for inspection. FURTHER, the Clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the Council thereof, f RESOLUTION ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING WHEREAS, the Clerk and the Engineer have, at the direction of the Council Pm ared an assessment, roll for the construction of Project No. 80 -14 Ke l er Parkway Sanitary Sewer -r and the said assessment roll is on f i l e in the office of the City Clerk; NOW, THERE-FORE, BE IT RESOLVED! BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing sh'a'll be held on the 22nd day of July, 1982, at the City y _y Hall at 8:15 __ to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning pro erty affected b such . P y improvement will be given an opportunity to be hea rd with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners of all property affected by said assessment. 3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time, and 1 ace of hearing, p g, the general nature of the improvement, the area proposed to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll is on f i l e with the Clerk, and that written or oral objections will be considered. NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of Maplewood,. Minnesota will meet in the Council Chambers, in the Municipal Building, at. 1380 Frost Avenue at 8:15 p. m. on July 22, 1982 to hear al persons concerning the adoption of the assessment roll . for Public Improvement No. 80 -14, Keller Parkway Sanitary Sewer, and to adopt the assessment roll as presented o amended. This hearing is scheduled pursuant to Minnesota .Statutes .Chapter 429. The assessment roll as herein described is on f i l e in the office-of the City Clerk. Area to be assessed: Keller Parkway from 100 feet south of Palm Cour.t to approximately 790 feet south. All persons who wish to be heard, or to object with refer ence to this, matter may present their cases at this hearing, either orally - or i ' No ap may y n wr • pp y b • e taken as to the amount of any assessment adopted unless a written objection signed • - g by the affected property owner i s filed ed wi th the City Clerk prior to the Assessment Hearin or resented t ' Hearing P o the presiding d� ng officer at the hearing. An owner may appeal an assessment to District c Court pursuant. to M.S.A. Secti 429."081 by serving notice f the • . 9 o : _ appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk of the city of Maplewood within thirty • y (30) days after the adoption of the assessment and by fil such notice with the District Court within ten da s after (10) y ter service upon the Mayor or City Clerk. Deferment of As sessments : Under the provisions of Minnesota S tatutes, Section 435.193 to 435.195 the City may, at its discretion, defer the payment of asses- sments for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a ha rdship to make the payments . The procedures for .applyi ng for such deferment are available from the City Clerk, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Lucille E. Aurelius City of Maplewood, Minnesota Dated this 7th day of July 9 1982 City Clerk Publish Maplewood Review July 7, and July 14 _ s o 1982 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLLS WHEREAS, the City Clerk and City En i neer have presented ' 9 p rated the final figures for the improvement 79 -15 Southl awn -- Radatz Improvements NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF -MAPLEW Q O D, MINNESOTA that the City Clerk and City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against P every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided b law, and the shall file a copy y y c py of such proposed assessment i n the City office for inspection. FURTHER, the Clerk shall, upon completion eti on of such proposed asses . p p p assessment notify the Council thereof, RESOLUTION ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING _ WHEREAS., the Clerk and the Eng ineer have, at the direct of the Council, prepared an assessment, roll for the co r ns SQuth1 aw- -Radat Z Improvements t uct� on of Proje No. 79 - 15 and the said assessment rol is f i l e i n the office of the City Clerk NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY . COUNCIL. OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: I. A heari shall be held on the 2 - 2nd day of July, 1982, at the City Hall at 8:3.0 p .m. to pass upon such r y p Proposed assessment and at such time o me and place all persons owning property affected improvement w�11 9 P P Y ected by such im P be given an opportunity to be heard with to such assessment. reference 2. The City Clerk is hereby irect • Y ed to cause a notice -of the hearin on the assessment to be ublished • g p i n the offi ci al newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hear* a • 9 nd to mail notices to the owners of a property affected by said assessment, 3. The notice of hearing shall state the e date,. time, and place of hearing, the general nature of the improvement the area proposed to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll is on file ' e with the Clerk, and that written or oral objections will be considered NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that. the City Co - Y y nc� 1 of Maplewood, Minnesota, , will meet in the Council Chambers, in the Muni' c i a ' pal Building, at 1380 Frost Avenue at 8:30 p.m. on July 22, 1982 to hear all ersons concerning P e ning the adoption of the assessment roll for Public Improvement Project No. 79 Improvements, and to adopt the a ' � P assessment roll as presented or amended. This hearing i s scheduled pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. The assessment roll as herein described is on=fi le in the office of the City Clerk. Area to be assessed: Southl awn Avenue from Beam Avenue to approximatel ma tel PP y 1400 south. All persons who wish to be heard, or to object with reference to this matter may present their cases at this hearing, either orally i n writing. n g No appeal may be taken as to the amount of any assessment adopted unless written obj ection on s i P a j sig ned by the affected property owner i s f iled ed with the City Clerk prior to the Assessment Hearing or presented to the resi di n 9 officer at the hearing. P An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court ursuant to M.S.A. serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Ci Clerk Section 429.081 b P y of the City of Maplewood within thirty (30) days after the d y e a option of the assessment and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten 10 days after service upon the Mayor or City Clerk. Deferment of Assessments: Under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 435.193 to 435.195 the City may, at its discretion, defer the payment of asses- sments for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. The procedures for applying for , such deferment are available from the City Clerk, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Lucille E. Aurelius City of Maplewood, Minnesota Dated this 7th day of July 3 ,1982 City Clerk Publish Maplewood Review July 7 and July 14 91982 t. 3� To whom it may concern: 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMNET PROJECT Action by Cour r%4* Endorsed_._ .�.f i a I�c�� eJ en ,tea v t....� is .�,.�� "..,,....�.....�. Date____...-_......._ .�...� Notic is hereby given that the City Council of the City f Ma Minnesota, will meet at the City H Y Ma plewood, Minne a 7, y all in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota t .00 o p.m. on June 28, 1982, to consider the ro osal of Tanners general partnership P P nners La Partners, a Minnesota g p rship whose partners are Northco, Ltd. and Turnpike Properties, Midwest, Inc. that the City ' � ty assist in financ- ing a project hereinafter described by the issuance of industrial development revenue bonds. Description of Project (Including general location) The acquisition of land located at the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Interstate 94 and Century Avenue in the City of Maplewood and the construction and equipping thereon of a 115 room Cricket Inn Motel. The estimated principal amount of bonds or other obligations project is 3 300 g to be issued to finance this pro J $ , ,000. Said bonds or other obligations if and when issued will not constitute o statute a charge., lien or encumbrance upon an P y property of the City except the project e against J and such bonds or obligations will not be a char a g g st the C it y 's general credit or taxing powers but are payable from sums to be aid b T Partners pursuant to a revenue agreement, P Y Tanners Lake A draft copy of the proposed application to the Commissioner Of E Planning and Development, State of Minnesota approval of the project, for together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, is available f 1982 from or public inspection beginning June 9, , m 8:00 o'clock a.m. to 5 :00 p.m., Monday through Friday, at the City Hall in Maplewood. At the time and place fixed for said Public Hearing, the City Council give all persons g Y cal of the City of Maplewood will g p sons who appear at the hearing an op- portunity to express their views with respect to the ro osal, P P Dated this 20th day of May, 1982. (BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL) B City Clerk Publish: Maplewood Review June 9, 1982. i i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMNET PROJECT To whom it may concern: _ i Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, will meet at the City Hall in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota at 7:00 o'clock p.m. on June 28, 1982, to consider the proposal of Tanners Lake Partners, a Minnesota general partnership whose partners are Northco, Ltd. and Turnpike Properties, Midwest, Inc., that the City assist in financ- ing a project hereinafter described by the issuance of industrial development revenue bonds. Description of Project (Including general location) The acquisition of land located at the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Interstate 94 and Century Avenue in the City of Maplewood and the construction and, equipping thereon of a 115 room Cricket Inn Motel. The estimated principal amount of bonds or other obligations to be issued to finance this project is $3,300,000. Said bonds or, other obligations if and when issued will not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance upon any property of the City except the project and such 'bonds or obligations will not be a charge against the City's general credit or taxing powers but are payable from sums to be paid by Tanners Lake Partners pursuant to a revenue agreement. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Commissioner Of Energy, Planning and Development, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, is available for public inspection beginning June 9, 1982, from 8:00 o'clock a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday :through Friday, at the City Hall in Maplewood. At the time and place fixed for said Public Hearing, the City Council of the City of Maplewood will give all persons who appear at the hearing an op- portunity to express their views with respect to the proposal. Dated this 20th day of May, 1982. -_ (BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL) B zze City Clerk Publish: Maplewood Review June 9, 1982. !-- a 7_, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT To whom it may concern: _ Notice is hereby given that the i C ty Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota will meet at the : of Ma lewood City Hall In the City p , Minnesota at 7 :Ba O" c p.m* on 1982, to consider the proposal of Tanners Lake Part ners, a Minnesota general partnership hose a p partners are Northco, Ltd. and Turnpike Properties, Midwest Inc. , that. the City y assist in f a project hereinafter described by the issuance of industrial development revenue bonds. Description of Project (Including general location) The acquisition of land located at the northeast quadrant of .the intersection of Interstate 94 and Century venue in the ' 1 Y City of Ma p ewood and the construction and equipping thereon of a 115 room Cricket Inn Motel. The estimated principal amount of bonds or other obligations to be issued to finance this r ' p oJect is $3,300,000. Said bonds or other obligations if and ' ' g when issued will not constitute a charge, lien en or encumbrance upon an property of the City except the project ect and such bonds or y obligations will not be a charge against the City's g y s general credit or taxing powers but are payable from sums to be ' ur pald by Tanners Lake Partners pursuant to a revenue agreement. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Colcumissioner of Energy, Planning and Development, p nt, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together with attachments and e 9 hall xhibi t ereto, is available for ublic inspection beginning ..k re 1982 from o' c ock a.m. to O'clock p.m., Monday through Friday, at the City all Maplewood. y in At the time and place f fixed for said Public Hearin the City Council of the City f Maplewood o y P ood will give all persons Who appear at the hearing an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal. Dated this day of �,� � lgg,7, (BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL) By /s/ Lucille Aurelius City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE ST. PAUL MINNESOTA OTA 55155 TO: THE CHIEF CLERICAL CAL OFFICER OF City o f Maplewood p wood RE: MINNESOTA LAW I982, CHAPTER 6 2 6 , APPLYING TO SAID UNIT SUBJECT: Hotel - motel revenue bonds WHEN SAID LAW HAS BEEN APPROVED LOCALLY THE CHIEF CLERICAL OFF MINNESOTA Sl :TUTES 645.021 ICER OF SAID LOCAL UNIT 2 1 REQUIRE OF GOVERNMENT TO SUB G WITH THE COPY OF THE MIT THE ENCLOSED CERTIFICATE ALONG RESOLUTION OF APPR TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE, , OVAL LOCAL APPROVAL MUST COME AFTER FINAL ENACTMENT OF FILED WITH THE SECRETARY OF S THE. BILL, AND MUST BE SESSI OI�� OF ST ATE BEFORE THE FIRST D THE LEGISLATURE OTHERW AY OF THE NEST REGULAR ISE IT WILL BE DEEMED TO BE DISAPPROVED, RETURN TO: Secretary f v • y State s Office ATTN: Jo Ann Silver Room 180 State Office St Bldg, Paul, Mn. 55155 • CERTIFICATE OF APPR : OVAL OF SPECIAL LAW BY GOVERNING BODY (Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 045.02 and 645.021) STATE OF MINNESOTA County , of TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF MINNESOTA: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, That the and • undersigned chief clerical officer, of the (name of governmental unit) - DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that at in compliance with the rovisions o p f Laws, 19 Chapter requiring approval b a * m Y J rity vote of the governing body y of said local governmental unit before it becomes effective the (designate governing body) at a meeting duly heald on the da y of 19 am""Me-UMSM by resolution (If other than resolution s did approve said Laws 1 specify) � 9 ,Chapter b a majority vote J y of all of the members thereof (Ayes......; Noes......; Ab • sent or not voting_,_,_) and the following additi onal steps, if any, requir- ed by statute or charter were taken: A copy of the resolution is hereto annexed and made a part of ' p this certificate by reference. SEAL Signed: (Official designation of officer) (This form prescribed by the Attorney General and furnished by the Secretary of State as required in Minnesota Statutes 645.021) T extraordinary majority is required by the special law insert fraction or percentage here, To From: Sijbject : May 21, 1982 Action by v ou ci i . Endorsed NOTICE OF HEARING I,o dif I ed..._,_ ---- ----�- Rejeet Date.- _____. Mrs. Lucille R �.. Boda, dba Bodel l , Inc., 1690 White The City of Maplewood Bear Avenue Notice of Hearing Forfeiture of "Off -Sale" L uor B Lice Revocation at 7:15 q and and Council Chambers P•m• June 28, ]982, Maplewood City Y On February 20, 1982, an underage It liquor 9 sai a arrest was .made at your li iquor establishment, Bodell Incorporated. the employees involved in this ' o porated. 0n May 11 , 1982, b th e court to a $500 fine and 10 da i s sale entered a guilty plea and w y s the were sentenced Y � 10 days were suspended, In accordance with the City . n y of Maplewood Municipal pal Code Sec Paragraph 2, which reads i art as follow ton 703.080, t P "Band (c) That in the e event of any violation ate on of the Provisions of any law relating o • 9 the business for which the license has been granted for the sale of i • intoxicating liquor, such bond shall be forfeited rfeited to the municipality in which license was issued." Y hiCh such In accordance with the City of Maplewood aplewood Municipa1 Code, Section 7 • 03.220. "703.220. REVOCATION OF SUSPEN SION. Any license under may granted here- • s ordi lanc y be revoked or suspended for vi • • of the of ati on of any prove of Minnesota. An "on -sale" 1 si on e or of the Liquor Control Act of th e State cerise may be suspended or revoked by the City Council. An t ' ended b e license may be revoked or suspended y the City Council orb the Stat ' Y to Liquor Commissi No license hereunder oner. shall be revoked or suspended u Council has held a public heari P nt�l the notice to the lice n9 pursuant to ten (10} days 1988 and no suspension may exceed s ty (60) ,Notice is hereby given a hear' i rig on carrying out the provisions of Cod Section 703. - 080 and 703.220 relating e held. at the M � sting to your bond and revocation ' ap 1 ewood City Counc Council meeting wi 11 be at 7:15 p.m., June 28, 1982, at 1380 Frost Avenue. cc City Clerk / City Manager✓ Liquor File 82- 001603 Liquor Control Commission t r } f X1 .3 MEMORANDUM coon b Council: A Y Endorsed TO: City Manager Modified- FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Special Use Permit Excavation /Variances Rejected . LOCATION: Highway 61 and Beam Avenue date APPLICANT: F.M. Frattalone Excavating, Inc. -PROPERTY- OWNERS: Conway Rosel 1, Frank Frattal one, Gerald Mogren and Robert Mogren DATE: June 2, 1982 SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL Request The appl icant is requesting a special use permit and - three variances to excavate dirt from the site. Proposed Use 1. The enclosed grading plan shows the existing and proposed contours. 2. Earthen dikes would be constructed to control erosion. 3. Eventually, the property is proposed to be developed into an industrial park. The proposed roads are shown on the enclosed grading plan. Recommendation I. Approval of a special use permit for mineral extraction, subject to the following conditions: A. Adherence to the requirements and standards set forth in Section 917 (Mineral Extraction) of the City Code. B. County Road D or Highway 61 be used exclusively for access to the subject site. C. In accordance with Section 917.060 (4), annual mineral extraction permits must be obtained from the City Engineer. A plan for each year's operation shall be approved by the City Engineer. Annual. permits shall designate the area, total acreage to be.excavated, quantity of material to be removed, and specific erosion control measures. D. All excavation shall be in accordance with each year's approved plan. No deviations shall be allowed without prior approval from the City Engineer. E. There. shall be no explosive detonations of any kind on the si te. • I FO A suitable structure or method of operation must be employed to remove excess dirt from truck bodies and tires prior to exiting onto a public right -of -way. ed all owing o G. A variance be grant 9 eration beyond the 30 -foot zone p established in Section 917.070 (2 D) of City Code. If the variance is g � 9 not ranted. rading operations must comply with the above Code by ceasing 30 feet from property 1 i nes . onsi bl a for acq any permits from H. The permit holder �s responsi other agencies. I. All grading shall be in accordance with the approved grading plan prepared y ared b Harr S. Johnson Companies, Inc., received April 28 . 19820 pp A roval of the three variances on the basis that: II. A The site is not adjacent to developed property with established grades. B. The owners intend to construct energy efficient earth- sheltered struct -ures. The steeper slopes (2:1} are necessary for this type of development. C. Erosion control techniques will be required to stabilize soils during and after mining operations. _ 2 _ BACKGROUND Site Description Gross average: Existing land use: 23 acres undevelo ed except Largel p for a single dwelling and -several accessory buildings Surrounding Land Uses P Northerl Pi a and high-tension power lines Easterly: : Highway 61 Gulden 's and undevelope d land. The undeveloped land has been under a Southerly: mining permit since April 28 1977* .Westerly: Undeveloped, except for two single dwellings at the end of Carey Heights Drive DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Plannin • • property is divided by a proposed north- south street, with BW, business warehouse to Land Use Plan Designation. The grope y the east , and RM medium density residential to the west. - M - l manufacturing . • 450 feet adjacent to Hi ghway 61 is 9 Zoning: The rest is F farm residence. VARIANCES Variance One 1. Section 917.070 (2) (B) requires a thirty -foot setback from the right -of -way of an existing public utility.. 2. Grading adin is proposed up to the NSP easement. 3 y A thi variance is required. _Variance Two _ • Section 917.070 (2) (D) requires a thirty -foot setback from the boundary - mining use. of an adjoining ng property not i n m g �. 2. Grading is proposed P ro osed u to the west property line* 3 A thirty -foot variance is required. - 3 - Variance Three 1. Section 917.070 (.6) (B) requires a maximum slope of five feet horizontal to one foot vertical.. 2. Slopes along the westerly property l i n e are as steep as two .feet to one foot. _3.. The ur ose of the steeper slopes is to allow for-the construction of p p earth - sheltered structures. Special erosion control techniques w i l l be required to stabilize these slopes during and after construction. Other Agencies r The Soil Conservation Serv.i ce reviewed the plan and found that: "Development of this plat w i l l require intensive application of erosion control measures of a primarily. vegetative nature. Erosion potential on the site is-high, but with the important exception 'that channels for high run -off velocities may need to be widened, lined with rock, or carried in a conduit,' can be controlled through well-timed use of mulch, diversions and grass cover." Procedure 1, Planning Commission recommendation 2. City Council holds a public hearing and makes a decision mb Enclosures: 1. Location Map 24. Property Line Map 3. Grading Plan (.Note that the grading plan covers a larger area than the present permit application.) - 4 - VAD A �t� 694 N IS HEIGHTS � WH i V ° W i IV - C BEAM B: 60 13. K O H L M A N CT. 2 2 L O L Koh /g7 on / Loke Loke ; KOHLMAN AVE. W N o 23 Z Q N COUNTY ROAD V c Z r- Q J V N I J I cn cn PALM CT. LU cr_ i o _j W v~i . J a z ; i ? 1 W z F - c0 uj ' cr v / r l .� �f n ? DEW LOCATION MAP NG �1 ` W 2 25 • r 0 � a 1 �Y Q BRQOK AVE.. E cr BRO cr uj 61 a m tt� SE XT NT t � GERVAIS AVE. Ej / G � ANDV71E7W AVE. I I V - 1 7 =DR. SHERREN AVE. _ COPE 1L AVE LARK AVE LARK AVE. 25 `' N 0 N TY R LAURIE RD. 2 L C] n25 AN I HURSTI 4 N N • � W , ',•' Z •..;fir cr i .�,o � - ,,, •..� Q ' ♦♦ � Iry ' 1 �� 1 '+•+ —•i"' � 1 • _ � ♦ / � � 1 1 f /if / IW' ° 1 + • 1c i �. / ♦ t '.(fie � •�+ •/I r. f: • rf �•+ —a+ T� r / . � / / • •/ Lij a: 77 ADdz w 1 ♦ T / < _ •� 3 1 �f Milk 1 1 1. ' •- ;'- f t dp i�- 3007 f � _ tom•^ � ?DC_ I 4 25 . t, , Gul den's - r � I a� S � •r �� s C I tf j r , � � `-►"' � yr' +•• v► • ` C j_ lE G� .4c .r f f R fir—._ +_ ` - e AY `.. . _ Y- Y • . -- � . SFAKA PROPERTY LINE MAP Q N / ib A No T "11 it 7 Jib I- o6w 16 15 INS N S P AMO PIPELINE EASEMENTS P ill I it , � i I lo Me *04 GULDEN 3 ' Y | -^ '^- �^ `-�''- '-`'�` to to ` 4 ~~ ^�r ^ ~' - , ~ ~'' `^^ ' ^ ^'` `--7 -- ~�^~~~~'~` - /' _..__ ~ ^ _. - - .{6�' ' �=� N6 %` ~ r~*� - ~ ^ Of � J -8 D. Special Use Permit /Variances: 3007 -3065 Highway 61 (Frattalone) Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting approval of a special use p ermit and three variances to excavate dirt from the site_. Staff is recommending approval as outlined their report. Frank Frattal one, applicant, said the grades were determined by the street that is proposed because of the closing of the intersection of County Road D and Highway 61. It is proposed to go through his property and connect at Beam Avenue Director of Public Works Haider commented on the proposed improvements to be made at the intersection of County Road D and H i ghway',61 by the Highway Department. Commissioner Ki shel moved the Planning Commission recommend t t he Ci ter Co n ci 1 the approval of a s eci use er mi t for mi neral extra on, s ubject to—the–f-0-1-owing co nditions 1. Adherence to the requirements and standards set forth in Section 917 (Mineral Extraction) of the City Code. 29 County Road D or Highway 61 be used exclusively for access to the subject site. 3. In accordance with Section 917.060 (4), annual mineral extraction permits must be obtained from the Director of Public Works. A plan for each year's operation shall be approved by the City Engineer. Annual permits shall designate the area, - total acreage to be excavated, quantity of material to be removed, and specific erosion control measures. 4. All excavation shall be in accordance with each years approved plan. No deviations shall be allowed without prior' approval from the Director of Public Works. 5. There shall be no explosive detonations of any kind on the site. 6. A suitable structure or method of operation must be employed to remove excess dirt from truck bodies and tires prior to exiting onto a public right -of -way. 7. A variance be granted allowing operation beyond the 30 -foot zone established in Section 917.070 (2 D) of City Code. If the variance is not granted, grading operations must comply with the above Code by ceasing 30 feet from property 1 i n es . 8. The permit holder is responsible for acquiring any permits from other agencies. 9. All grading shall be in accordance with the approved grading plan prepared by Harry S. Johnson Companies, Inc. received April 28, 1982. Commissioner S1 etten seconded Ayes- -Commi ss i oners Fischer, Howard, Ki shel , Prew, S1 etten, Whi tcomb; El l efson Abstained— Commissioner Barrett 4 6 -7 -82 Commissioner Ki shel moved . the_P_l anni n C om is sin recommend a • - - -.� m o - -- .- -- p �roval of the three variances on the 6asis that: -1. The site is not adjacent to developed property • p perty with established shed grades . 2. The owners intend to construct energy fficient earth- hel tered structures. The steeper slopes (2:1) are necessary for this 'type of development, yP 30 Erosion u control technique's will be required r - • • q. q ed to stabilize sods during. and after mining ng operations. Commissioner S1 etten seconded Ayes-- Comrni ss i oners Fischer • ,Howard, Ki shel , Prew, S1 etten, Whi tcomb, El l efson Abstained -- Commissioner Barrett 90 UNFINISHED BUSINESS T { �z MEMORANDUM w� Sir Y ` lyr T0: City Manager FROM: Associate Planner, Johnson SUBJECT: Planned Unit Development Revision /Pr' i mi nom^ �_ y Plat LOCATION: Dorland Road, North of Linwood Avenue = APPLICANT: Castle Design and Development _ - OWNERS: p Harry Bullock and Glenn Beckl and action by Counc PROJECT: Adrienne's Addition DATE: May 27, 1982 Endors s d Mod-if j_e�. SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL Re' ec l ed Re nest Dat Revise the Linwood Heights Planned Unit Development to include the p proposed Adrienne's Add preliminary plat for ten townhouse units, Proposal 1. See map two for the location of the ro osed Adrienne's ' P p nne s Addi t� on . 2. Refer to map three for the configurati of l ots and blocks, 3. The development would consist of three townhouse buildings: a. East side of Dorland Road (Block three) A four unit buildin (each unit containing one bedroom) b. West side of Dorland Road (Blocks one and two Two -th unit buildings (one building would have a one bedroom and two, two- bedroom units, the other building would have three one - bedroom units.) 4. The townhouses would have -the same floor lans as those ap p pp ed for the original Linwood Heights PUD, 5. Each townhome unit would have i ts* own tuck e. ara 9 9 6. A lot division has been approved to create p arcel s one and two: 7. The dashed lines on the plat indicate lot lines. Note that h • t lot line for each unit is beyond the building line, to provide each unit w� and area p with private y . The balance of the property (outl.ots A and B) would be owned _ by the Linwood Heights homeowner's association. This ro ert ' and space, and P p y� private y p the building exteriors would be maintained by the homeowner's s assoc CONCLUSION `— Analysis This plat would be a logical extension of the Linwood Heig PUD. If 9 it had been proposed as part of the original PUD, it would have been recommended for approval. Natural Amenity Preservation The proposal meets the requirement for preservation of trees and slopes that may otherwise be di sturbed i f only * si n 1 e dwel l i n • . 9 gs were to be = permitted . i The only portion of the site to be left in its natural state ihe souther � '- ' state, 'f s 1 ocated � i n n and northeastern areas of outl of B (map three). . Substant � ) Substantial grading and the removal of mature trees would be necessary to con ' � n these This construct single e dwellings ese areas This would be contrary to efforts presently being undertaken to save numerous trees and Y• natural slopes on the main PUD site. Building Design The Community Design Review Board must make a finding that the s will be comp atible proposed townhouse building pati bl a with nearby single a dwellings, before a final plat can be approved, p Recommendation I . Revise the Linwood Heights Planned Unit Development to include ' clude Adrienne s Addition, subject to: The Community Design Review Board making a findi that the r townhouses will . proposed • h 1 be of a scale, design, and lo cat i on on that. i s comp bl a wz single dwellings locate p t don adj acent property. II. Approve the Adri enne's Addition Prel - i mi nar Plat subje • Y Ject to. A. Revision of the Linwood Heights PUD to include Adrienne' ' Adrienne's Addition. B. Revision of the Linwood Heights home owner's association bylaws y aws and rules, as appropriate, to include Adrienne's Addition. These changes shall be approved b City staff g Y y to insure that all common areas will be maintained and that access can be gained to all public improvements. C. Footings shall be finned b • • d to assure that party walls s will be constructed exactl p y registered surveyor before the foundation i s laid on common lines, or foundati must be constructed and surveyed before submitting a final plat. D. City Engineer's approval of an erosion control 1 an before ' permits p e building p is are issued for Adrienne's Addition. E. The developer's agreement for the Linwood Heights - ghts Development shall apply to Adrienne Addition, with specific regard to soil .stabilization i - - Addi ton follow ing the completion of Dorland Road. -2- BACKGROUND Site Description Gross Acreage: Linwood Heights PUD 15.2 Adrienne's Addition 1.6 16.8 acres Ne't Average: Linwood Heights PUD 12.3 - Adrienne's Addition 1,6 13.9 acres Existing Land Use: Undeveloped Surrounding Land Uses North: Linwood Heights PUD East: Single Dwelling South: Single Dwellings West: A 318 x 145 foot land-locked rear and of y a single dwelling. This rear yard area was exempted from the storm sewer assessment for the Dorl and Road Project. The owner wishes it to remain undeveloped, . Past Actions 7 0=2 -81: Council approved a special use permit for the - Linwood Heights g PUD, to construct 74 townhouse uni ts subject to the finding by the Community Design Review Board that the buildings are of a scale, design, and location that is compatible with single - family homes in any adjacent RL area . 7- 28 -81: The Community Design Review Board approved the a Linwood Heights PUD, subject to the following requirements: 1. Three landscaping conditions 2. All townhouse units shall have a floor area of at least 1,150 square feet according to Code. 3. Submission of an erosion control plan, incorporating the Soil Conservation Services recommendations to the Director of Communit y Development, ment before building permits are. issued. 4.- Owner and applicant agree to the above conditions in writin . . 9 3- 24 -82: Staff approved a lot split to create Parcels One and fur (Map Two), subject to: 1. Council ordering the construction of Dorl and Road, north of Linwood Avenue. (It is presently under construction.) - 3 - In 2. Subdivision of Parcel one shat • 1 not be permitted. for a period of unless platted. P one year, 3. The deeds creating these ro er - p p t� es shall be recorded within n s� x months s o 5- 26 -82: Staff approved a lot split 'ect P � t to .create Two and - � to a deed bein recorded (Map Two }, sub 9 within n six .months of approval DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS . Plan ng 1. Land Use Plan Designation: : R 9 L, Residential Lower. Densit t y 2. Allowed Density: 14 people /net acre 3. Proposed Density: 13.6 People/net acre (Adrienne.s Addition) 13.9 people /net acre (Overhall PUD ) 4. Unit Mix: One-Bedroom Units Two - Bedroom Units Total Original PUD 52 Adrienne's Addition 22 74 8 2 60 -- 10 24 84 5. Zoning: F, Farm Residence 6. Policy Criteria from the P1 an: classification . The Residential Lower Density f1 cats on allows for concerntrations of Multiple dwelling units within defined - areas, where the conditions below are met. Single dwellings, double dwellin s tow be found dwelling s nhouses , quads, and apart- merits may d in this The following - e o f d � n9 condo ti ons must be met before this type development may be perm a. Where it is necessary to cluster ' units �n order to preserve valuable natural fea tures * such as wood lots, wetlands or topographic features. areas of unusual b. The maximum dens t approved y pp oved by the City Council shall be based on area of natural features to be r the preserved and the quali of site and g design. In no case, however shat 1 e per 1 the dens' i building exceed 14 peo p p net acre. c. Where the development is art of a • P planned unit development. 7. d. Where the building(s) are of a s • - tale, design, and location that is compatible with s i ngl e� dwel l i n homes located 9 on adjacent property. Compliance with Land Use Law ' on 911.010 (9) of City b . s Section states that a special use permit may be issued in � t developments, any use district ct for a planned unit subject to: - 4 - "(d) The development shall conform to the plan as ' Village p fi filed with the of Maplewood and any variations from the 1 an shall require p recommendation by the planning board and approval by the Village Council*. -r -Public-Works 1. Water and sewer are available. 2. Erosion control should be provided to stabilize the fill from the Dor land Road Project, Procedure 1. Planning Commission recommendation. 2. City Council -- public hearing and decision mb Enclosures: h. Location Map ?. Property Line Map -. Adrienne's Addition Preliminary Plat = 4 Linwood Hey ghts Final Plat T - 5 - Pt or UPPE AFTON MD. T2sNR22W 2A4O0 LOWER ArTI R D. or L Q-N I LA. N j6- CS (2 jj �l 74 rM/"91E FAIVI I EWTZ LAVE cj 4c S 2 C 2 7 0 2?*..- . Map 1 LOCATION MAP . � w n , 1 • s.�,�s _,• 4 ) :15 ' �a _ mss- -- . --_ -s -' -� -, �t� �� ,�• �lr/xD 14 ti'u /O o w - '�-- •90 - -- 0tj �t r - -- 90 —_ c 4 3 v a 7 IV 9 � -- -4 7,v ID R1V_ i -_ - l `AZ - � LI Nw00D HEIGHTS PUD .. 57 f 1 Dor] and Road PARCEL 1 .� RCEL 2. l r i lit. Z PARCEL - '- 4 PARCEL 3 -- _ .mw — L -now 9 I I - - r PROPERTY LINE MAP Proposed expansion of the Linwood Heights PUD (Adrienne's Addition) L IN WOUC, 1 � HE IGH'� — - - • .--- __-_'_ - - • - - 1 J 3.52 - - _ . I � ;• 1 15 90 ` ;N EAP ! E M. L . W 0 I. cv! � 90 , Q , rn 4 90' ,�40 --, _ I N r N M M-L W 1 0 Q, cv1J0 , �. rn Q, RANCH ` 90 or 90 . 3 o E } .L. W.O. $ - RANCH 2 ,w i J. F A ' , G \ -• •a'. `-- ` - i I `N � RANCH 3 N' J • ( -_ A 1 �' co -+w 4 RA °� , 4 a cv c° '•' !^ r O Im I r N 0 co co O IM �D RANCH ti i�'`• Ic) 90 M yy 0. ;- Y OUTLOT ' - 10 RANCH gyp, o r ►- cv r I 9G' W. 0 a ' !_ I o j ;N 3 RANCH j I' - ••. Ilk LA tae -r A C v Ob C•.tl. t� / ` � � r I �.. ' ,• , E �` 113.52- CIA :.� -_• .tom• _ ` , � + `': h 1 1 r 232. � ' ! I .4 cj '- • w• -f f ••.. SfQV in Ex 1 wR•E 4L 1 a r Gf SE k.l �' l i : i` i r t C 6 V i 1 L' Ex t rw A t J'v• • 3 - -- PAP LINW � ~E� Chi �_ ��_ �JOL AVENUE r: . =7 Map 3 Preliminary pl Adrienne's Addition 4 N � �..,�;:.• ;: ! Vii S,;I „�� ; . • ' -•. ,. • 1_ 1h kht o .S {hwc lti �''::.:..•': � �l QNarftr q ^ ih�r S fhl Q,,,.4 ' q' ;eebbo 11 h� N. sell u'!S "E. • .... : 1 ... s � 411, * .#,j 1j•., „ -, ,#, HILLW000 ag '"' ' ' , :a..� ••���• _x'� _ DR lVE as to Id �• 1 0 a M>1�•H H � F r M S 'M b .�.t ISZ.4 � � Z � �I .�) i..) I� w ' , 0 90. O y, .� ,x 1 j1.lt. j�' M.R•tI'11 11A T R w 1•bi lf'!. Q . Q 2 vf + t\i RMyIH•t !' 1 M� f !� ti O p O r' 11••�� s_ �.�► eZ l► J - - ��• M i •L'• 1. ,� .; �,1;' 3 x = 3 ° N. N'fti' is t N two 3 all OL ,�.�' .11 i �p j - • \ •fib j J ri - f'• `� C O`er !ti ? '� f + .��! *' % , i,• �. I t • ��t 11 `,��' `v0 �., .��� .- s..N�x ��. 1 '� _� i.}j��V �1�1 � F 2 .� � � .• \ , I � ' 3 r �„ Q�c.� 2 dt lo ►_- d • t� �• , '? j 0, `�,: • 4 • C M,♦ rC , ?�. h ? y : j, : fs O N off �' tt ' Z e h o '� '�, ,� '•" ,, ± �,, o� , '�� 4 �:. �• 0 L� 1 LO T t _ K • , 4�• , a0 w ♦ V , �. i1 /• !1 t: 1, 1 �� 00 P '! • �`� ••ti1 ,` N� 4� wife j �• • b � � ; - b.i!•!:'S�'M• K1: ��tii�.• � 3 { �. •. >,� I•�1,fr S 3 ? i �� N O NZ +t rl e + �� C � U/, /,/ �;�, , ' �4� i. a ,�, Sr+ ; '�-+ $ to �” i , l At-, J fol ,� e1ti c °, �'" 4 v ; ti, r; � . O 0 q y •� of + . tq� .....r + ' b s b� �r IOUTL OT C 14 x 14 0�-60 10 V ! 1 0 .00 1 ilk t ' 1 '' 11iJ e f 1 ' A il 2 Ilk t ` Z* I L a All ell 0 Id-W51 Uri 1 oti ,, ' ,o�:`'� zo.0o ,� ,� o o F ���� II ,ti�1 ►� , si < �►N•Ir m !� '�' • 0 0 i' �i 1 X1'1.4 1 �'� 4 8 t • / L� 0 jj. �, ��;�- DR o °� �0 !, � ��� ?�3 •� 1 L • :ry * M �� •, Go +p �N ,1y� li'S �• �' a. �� .. $:� +I�!+� x•44 ,� f ,tip,, I�n�"„- M , a° 9 � � � h� � `� tZ °° Zc ?o'°e� ` � . �� �� gyp, r � 4 ^�• �; ��� � ' • �: - .i3 • •� rr � ., � �t.pp . K. �. t, • "�- ti o de. AV 'lo 0 r o ° `� OIL 1 •a ,; is ti ,, tip' t Z +' s �,? t '� z r ° 8 { t ' o h 00 Z o W 0 IOU r r; o •• tip„. °° .Map 4 Linwood Heights PUD _ approved Final Plat % i. V N►, b�j fortes �b ��,. i • .: �_""_ 8 10 9. ualr/j t`itueit� ' - i t OUTLoT 6 ta w 4 N i Y � ! tt 31'90'ry _� 410. oq C. PUD /Prel i mi na ry Plat--Adrienne's ' s Add�tion. Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting n revision Heights P q 9 eve si on of the Linwood Hei g Planned Unit Development to include the proposed ' Addition preliminary plat for ten townhouse units, �. P P Adrienne's P is . Staff is recommending approval as outlined in their report. Ken Gervai s. applicant, said the bu i Tdi n - s ili l l b identical ' e 3 enti cal to those in Linwood Heights. -_ Commissioner Fischer l h P a L � 1 nn Comma ss i on recomm nd At - e - : Cam. Counci revise th e Linwood Hei hts P1 anned _ _ . _ _ __ _ Un De to _ include Adrienne s Additions subj to the Comm nit Design Revi Board making a finding that the ro os t ' a scale d -p p t own ho uses wi l l_be of esign_, and _locati that i s compatible w� th sin dwel t i n s l ocated on adjacent pro per _ _ — g Commissioner Sl etten seconded Ayes--Commis . s i n ' o ers Barrett, Fischer, Howard, Ki shel , Prew, S1 etten, Whi tcomb s Ell efson Commissioner Fischer roo ted th P.l 4njMr g_C9 o ecomm Ci t Cou ' Preli -n--� _ _ end_the -.t -0 _: �! _ 1 ap the Adrienne's Addition ar. P1 at subi -______s_ -- e c t 1. Revision of the Linwood Heights PUD to include Adr' ' ' Adrie Addition. 2. Revision of the Linwood Heights homeowner's assocati o n by laws and rules, as appropriate, to include Adrienne's Addition. These ese changes shall be app oved by City staff to insure that all common areas w i l l be maintained and that access can be a i ned to all public i ' 9 p b c improvements. 3. Footings shall be pinned by registered surveyor 9 y r before the foundation is laid to assure that party walls will be constructed exactly common lines., or foundations on ns must be constructed and surveyed before submitting a final plat. 4. City Engineer's approval of an erosion control tan before ' p o e buy lding permits are issued for Adrienne's Addition. 5. The developer's agreement for the Linwood Heights Development 9 shall apply to Adrienne's Addition, with specific regard to soil stabilization g � 1 i zat� on following the completion of Dorl and Road. Commissioner Sl etten seconded Ayes- -Commi ss i oners Barrett Fischer, Howard, Ki shel , Prew, Sl etten, Whitcomb 9 El 1 efson 3 6 -7 -82 r, MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager Action . FROM: � by Cct��,G� �. Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Code Ame d n merit: Mobile Homes in R - 1 Zones Endorse DAVE : June 2, 1982 - . Rej ectcd_... fat e -.a -_. INTRODUCTION Request Counci 1 member J uker requested q ted on November 5 that the .Code be amended nded to prohibit single -wide mobile homes in R -1 Residence Districts (single dwelling). Comments Counci lmember juker feels s that single-wide mobile homes should uld not be allowed in R -1 districts for the following reasons: 1. Most mobi le homes are not compatible ' with d p ible in design wi other ty es of single p ngle 2. Mobile homes may deva ue other types of single dwellings, . Because of recent state legislation, sla . g tion, cities may not prohibit mobile ho they may. regulate width and typ of fou homes, but • p foun dation. The enclosed ordinance requir r minimum width of eighteen feet and a r q es a Permanent foundation. . Most single- mobile homes are e 12 to 14 feet in width, with a few at conventional homes have a sixteen feet. Most width of 24 to 28 feet. Recommendation Approval of the enclosed ordinance, ic t BACKGROUND 1. The existing code allows mobile homes in all zoning districts, 20 Section 912.140 states that, "Special permits shall be required for the placing of a house trailer or mobile home on a property for temporary use as a dwelling. Said temporary use permit shall not exceed 90 days from the date of issuance." This section restricts temporary* use, but not the permanent use of mobile homes in residential districts. 3. Modular homes are similar in design to conventional homes, but most of the work is done in factories. The house is then shipped to the site in sections. s 4. In 1979, the Metropolitan Council surveyed sixty metropolitan communities and found that 51 or 85% of them restrict mobile homes to mobile home parks, except for emergency situations. 5., The State recently changed the Municipal Planning Act to prohibit the exclusion of mobile homes from cities. (Refer to the enclosed "Action Alert" from the League of Minnesota Cities,) Enclosure: proposed ordinance "Action Alert" A ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING MINIMUM WIDTH AND FOUNDATION - DATIGN REQUIREMENTS IN R -1 ZONES THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: .j SECTION 1. Section 904.100 is hereby added • y d as follows.. 904.100. BUILDING WIDTH AND FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS. 1. The minimum building width on an side shall y .all be at least eighteen feet. The building width shall not include entryways, or other appurtenances pp that do not run the full depth of the building, 2. All buildings shall provide a ermanent founds ' p foundation with per -meter frost footings or a floating" s l a b that meets the State Building Code. ng SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage and publication as rovi ded b law. P y Passed by the Maplewood tit y Council, this day of 19 82 . Mayor Attest: Ayes - Clerk Na y s - April 15, 1982 TO: City Managers, Admi nistrators, Clerks (P1 ease pass a copy along to your city planner or-zoning ' Y P admini strator) strator) FROM: Duke Addi cks , Legislative Counsel Cathy Quiggle, Research Assistant ' RE: Mobile /Manufactured Housing It Mi nnesota Laws 1982 Chapter 490 amending M.S. ' 462.357 , Subd. 1 changes the Municipal Planning Act to prohibit the exclusion n of mobile/manufactured 1 e /manufactured homes from cities. (The complete text of the law as amended i s enclosed. New language i s underlined, old language is stricken.) These new provisions are not effective ' e unti 1 August 1, .1982. Until .then, any manufactured homes are subject to the zoning or • effect in a city 9 �nance presently in Pursuant to this new legi slation, b August • Y 9 1, L982, cities may wish to amend their zoning ordinances to establish the foll owing: 11 design standards for dwell in residential districts such ' a s • m inimum 1 mum w� dth , minimum square footage, siding material, roof lines, type of foundation . YP n requi cements , 20 residential district(s) in which only dwellings meeting the Uniform Building Code are permitted; 3. residential district(s) in which manufactured homes as ' defined by M.S. 327.31 - 327..35 (not required by law to meet the Uniform Bui lding Cod • g e) are permitted as well as site built homes which meet the Uniform Building ode i.e. a mixed ' 9 s xed d�stri 4. mobile home park district (s) for those mobile homes unable e to meet design standards i n- residential districts, There iS- some confusion over whether • n the establishment of the above mentioned des _ ..standards is now the only legal method of regulatin g the lo catio n on of vanufactured homes within a city. The Michigan Supreme Court held in Knoll. 302 NW 2 Robinson on To shi v. Donald . d 146 (Mich. 1981) , that a municipal pal i ty' s exclusion o : mobi _ le homes (OVER) 300 hanover building, 480 cedar street, saint paul, minnesota 55101 _ C612] 222 28B 1 APR 1 1982 -2- from all areas not designated as mobile e home parks had no reasonable basis under • e the pol ice power and was therefore unconstitutional. The .Court stated, however, o _ ,that a mobile home could d be excluded i f i t failed ed to satisfy reasonable star�ards designed to assure a favorable comparisons sons with permitted - g ;_ P p tted site bui 1 t �hous i ng. Thus, regulation by des i gn standards appl to both site built and manufactured ho - using s eems to be t he:-.preferred approach. - It can =be argued, however, that under the ' e c ty s authori to regulate by class of building (M.S.. 462.357 Subd. 1) it can establish some - residential districts ' which permit manufactured homes and some which do not. The fact that manufactured homes are subject to a different building code than site built homes would seem to be a recognition that they are, in fact, a different-class of building. 9 It can also be argued that the intent of the legisl i n assi n the new law w P 9 as to prohibit - only the total exclusion of manufactured homes from a city. Lin y r� 24 of al read, "No regulation or sin the bill origin l e fa 1 zoning ordinance may • � , g prohibit 0 0 0 manufactured homes built in conformance w* th sections ect�ons 3270 31 Subd. 6 or any other s s ngl a fami 1 y dw l l i gs that comply with al 1 other zoning. ordinances ursuant - �� 9 ces p romulgated p to this section. It would seem that if the legislature intended to prohibit the exclusion of manufactured homes from all single ngle family districts it would have passed the b i l l as originally written instead of ass i n the amended P 9 vers whi ch deleted the phrase "si family zoning ordi nance". Therefore i 9 f the city were to establish some district ct permitt manufactured homes w� thin tie_ ci - ------ _ _ _ _ �.� : ______�_ __ _ _ _� ..� _ _ ty t would seem o be i n �compi� ante with the _ ntent o h - �t e i aw . Again these changes in the Municipal Pl anni n Act do not become effects ' 9 effective until August 1,- 198.2. Because the application of the law i unclear we w i l l ass along ng further information as it becomes available. If you have further uestions lease q p call Cathy Quiggle at the League office. Through April 23rd our P hone number w i l l be (612) 222 -2861; thereafter, it will be (612) 227 -5600. DA : CQ : rmnn Attach. 4 Y y • i Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 19:80 Section read: cti on 462.357, Subdivision 1, is amended to Subdivision 1. AUTHORITY FOR ZONING.) .) For the hea 1 th N _purpose of romoti • c safety, morals and general welfare a p n9 the public , municipality pal i ty may by ordinance regulate the. 1 ocati on, height, width bul � s k t e of founda ti on , number o • buildings and other structures the f stot� t i es , size of of ar -�s a spacess,the � e pence Cage o of which may be oCcu i e � ' y • and other open dens i t a p d, the size ze of bu -d� n s and y nd di str� buti on of population the 9 structures for trade, industr resid uses acti vi es , or other ur oses y s ence, recreati on, public c • cul tune, forestry, P p , and the uses of land for trade i • recreation, agr� � industry, residence, , soil • n se conservation, water Supply c • conservation of shorel ands, as defined ned i pp y onservat� on, section 105.485, access to direct sunlight energy systems . as defined in section 116H ght for solar purposes, and may establish 42, flood control or other y a , bl i sh standards and procedures regulating p rohibit t construction egul ati ng such uses. No regulation may p earth sheltered .red as defy • � � , ned i n section 116H.02, subdivision 3, or manufactured homes bui 1 t i n con formance w� th s 327 0 35 that Ee�p yes comp w1 a ect� ons 327.31 to o er Zo o � nances promu gate pursuant to this section . The re may di . y v� de the municipali into districts table.. numbers, shape and area, The r or . zones of suitable or kind of b regulations shall be uniform for each class u� 1 di ngs , structures or land and for ass such district but each class or kind of use throughout he regulations ons i n one district may 9 y di ffer from those i n o ther districts. The ordinance nce embodying these regal ati ons shall be • ordinance and shall consist of known as the zoning • text and maps. A city may b ordinance appl ication of its zoning re regulations t y, a extend the g o 'unincorporated terr located within of its limits in any direction, but h� n two miles o ted zoning � t not � n a county or town which has ad • p ng regulations ; provided that where two ties have boundaries 1 ess than f o or more noncontiguous guous mun� ci pal i - our mi 1 es apart, each is authoriz to c zonin of land on its side of a l i n e control the al i ti i n the affected equidistant stant between the two noncontiguous ' p es unless a town or county 9 muni - ci may then ted area has adopted zoning regulations, Any city y y eaf ter enforce such regulations ons i n the area to the .name extent as i such property were situated within its corporate limi until th r e cou or town board adopts a comprehens zoni g egul ati on which includes the area. /Mm Z 4/15/82 r A. Code Amendment. Mobi le H -� omen i n R -1 Distric cts Secretary Olson said the Pl anni n g - - Commi ssion reviewed this. at their last meeting. The proposed ordinance amendment nt p s i ncluded l udec� i n the staff report. The ordinance would regulate the width of r -� st uctures to be constructed in the R -I zoning district. Commissioner Barrett moved the Planning Commission recommend to the Ci t Counci 1 a royal of the pro posed ordinance ' re o P included �n th staff _e_P dated J 2 9 8 �, _ w_ c re_s_ c s u� n w� foundati on r ement. - � - ------ 9 ----. __an ._ asp r eq uir ement, Commissioner Ki shel seconded • Ayes - - Co11 m ss i oners E] 1 efson , Fischer, Howard, Barrett, Ki shel , Prew, S1 etten Whitcomb, ' i 'L `i MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: Award of Bids for Insurance DATE: June 15, 1982 PROPOSAL Act-ion Act-ion by Council : Fndersed R ected Date It is proposed that the City's existing insurance policies for workers compensation, auto and liability coverages be renewed effective July l 1982 with our present carriers as recommended by the A 9 ents Insurance Committee. BACKGROUND It has been past practice to have the Agents Insurance Committee solicit quotations each year for City insurance (except employee coverages) . Last year quotations were received from Home Insurance Company and the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT). This year, only one quotation was received and it was from the LMCIT. The Home Insurance Company did not submit a quotation because they believed it would not have been competitive with the LMCIT. Present City insurance coverages are provided by the LMCIT. The LMCIT was recently created under the authority of a Joint Powers Act (M-S, 471.59) with the objective of providing a means by. which cities can obtain needed insurance coverage at a reasonable cost. Part of the impetus for the LMCIT was the fact that many cities have been able to get only one carrier (Home Insurance Company) to bid for their insurance. The LMCIT workers compensation program is a joint self- insured program that was started on January 1, 1980. The LMCIT property and liability program was started on June 1, 1980. It is a joint insurance program wherein National Union Insurance Company will insure all participating cities and return any excess premiums based on the loss experience of the participating cities. BID ANALYSIS The following is a comparison of 1980 and 1981 insurance costs with the bid submitted: 1980 1981 1982 Costs Costs Bid Property 12 10 11 Liability 20 20 21 Auto 23 19 19,359. Bond 640 640 640 Sub -Total 57 50 52 Workers Comp. 80 76 77 Total T137 127 1299352 More detailed information regarding the quotation is in the attached .report from the Agents Insurance Committee. It should be noted that the workers compensation quotation is based upon a retrospective rating p1 an (or retro plan) rather than a prospective rating plan (or standard plan . } Under the standard plan, the annual premium is based on an experience modification factor and i s subject to adjustment onl y for payroll costs . Under the retro plan, the annual premium is also based on an experience modification factor and is-subject to adjustment for payroll costs. However, the retro plan premium is also based upon actual losses. The retro plan can save money when losses are low but the City is exposed to penalty premiums when losses are high. RECOMMENDATION I concur with the recommendation of the Agents Insurance Committee that the present insurance policies be renewed for one year with the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. A representative of the committee will be at the Council meeting to answer questions. cc: Jerry Ekblad E . ..P EKBLAD, PARDEE & BEWELL, INC. INSURANCE /BONDS 2050 WHITE BEAR AVENUE ST. PAUL,., MINNESOTA SS'109 PHONE: (612) 777_8381 June 14, 1982 Mr. Dan Faust City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Dan, On behalf of the Insurance Committee I am submitting the bid from the League Safety Program. We went to the Home which also has a Safety Program for cities Y g , but they decided to pass as last year they were about $15,000 high on property and liability and can't compete on the workers compensation except in maximum premium. So far on the workers compensation you have received money back on the deposit premium. I feel the league bid is excellent. As of March 9th, Nordstrom has paid and has loss reserves for the 2 years of $69,339.00. In their ratin g y the did not consider $30,000 of loss reserve, which could easily be spent in defense; costs. I am still going to recommend the Retro even if the last 2 years dividends on the league plans would have made the net cost lower. Over the last 9 y ears the Retro would have been the best plan. If you want to consider the Safety Program the EBA estimates dividends for next year between 25 & 30% of the deposit premium which could give you a net cost of $55,000. If the Home had bid they would have to get the loss information to bring the modifier current. Very truly yours, .- jeroem u lad , CLU ,THE: enc . YOURS ndepeiMent lnwrance AGENT "NVES You 1"ws'r Property Liability Auto Bond Paramedic (Western World) Workers Compensation - Retro Deposit Maximum Premium Minimum Premium Basic Premium Loss Conversion Factor PREMIUM SUMMARY 1981 1982 $10 $11 20 21 19 19 640.00 640.00 1,807.50 ,�. 1 $52 $53 $76,882.00 126,869.00 31,658.00 31,658.00 1.10% $77,305.00 131,256.00 28,282.00 28,282.00 1.10% CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Insurance Bid 1982 Descrip 1981 1982 1) All Risk Multi- Peril Institutional Form 6 32$s 400 $ , $7 $1000 deductible (Difference is using 100% or 90% of values furnished) 2) Heavy Equipment - All Risk $1,000 deductible (list furnished) 597 619 3) Miscellaneous Equipment - All Risk $250 deductible (list furnished) 4) Tool Floater - - $100 deductible 5) Valuable Papers - $250 deductible 6) Bailees - Police Department 7) Voting Machines - All Risk $250 deductible 8) Comprehensive General Liability Bodily Injury including Personal Injury Property Damage Independent Contractors Contractual Host Liquor Employees as additional insureds Incidental Malpractice $504 deductible on sewer exposure Additional Insureds 1) Ramsey County - July 4th Fireworks 2) State of Minnesota (lot) 3} Ramsey County - Court Premises 319 354,323. 5,000. 5 7,000. 7,0009 7,500, 7,500. 58 58,4520 500000. 500 . . .._ . M .,..._ ...,. >,.'�5...�. >_f.....,._,..� �� w�:.::,._,.:.,:. �w .,� w,.. .._._.........,...�.::.a._..{., w,�,:..,..r V.. ,_ _ -. r� _ 9) Automobile Liability Bodily Injury and Property Damage Basic ,PIP Coverage Uninsured Motorists $100 deductible Comprehensive $1000 deductible Collision 10) Workers Compensation 11) Blanket Fidelity Honesty & Faithful Performance Position Bond (Includes coverage for Treasurer) 12) Paramedics - Medical Malpractice $100$000/300, Written by Western World League does not pick up on their policies, $500,000 $5009000 Statutory Statutory 50. 50.1000 � + k MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Public Works . Coordinator SUBJECT: Rescinding Diseased Shade Tree Ordin ctio y - DATE: June Hance n b� 21, 1982 En- crc� Pei J. d E: , Ordinance No. 358 of the City of Maplewood e ewood r ui res art of p G certain actions on the p staff, as well as residents of the Ci Lack of funding for the ram 1982 p g prevents proper conduct of the program, therefore, placi staff in the position of not complying with the ordinance. It is recommended that the ordinance be rescinded ,q • ORDINANCE NO. 358 AN ORDINANCE MiENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF CITY OF MAPL ,FOOD BY ADDING A NE14 C11APTEh 50-6 CONTROL OF DUTCH EUI DISEASE �� a The City Council of the City of Maplewood. does hereby ordain as .follows : - 510 CONTROL OF DUTCH EUM DISEASE • 510.010 Program of Plant Pest Co ntrol. The City Manager and those agents appointed by him are hereby empowered to conduct a program of plant pest control pursuant to authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 18..022. The program is directed specifically at the control and elimination of Dutch Elm disease fungus and elm bark beetles and other epidemic diseases of shade trees. 510, 020 Inspection and Investigation. The City Manager or his agents (1) shall inspect all premises and places within the city as often as practicable to determine whether any condition described in Section 510.030 of this ordinance exists thereon. He Shall investigate all reported incidents of infestation by Dutch Elea fungus or elm bark beetles or any other epidemic diseases of shave trees; (2) may enter upon private premises at any reasonable time for the pur- pose of carrying out any of the duties assigned them under this ordinance; and (3) shall upon finding conditions indicating Dutch Elm infestation or other epidemic d�.seases of shade trees, i ...ediately send appropriate specimens or samples to the Co-mnissioner of Agriculture for analysis, or take such other steps for diagnosis as may be recommended* by the Commissioner. 510.030 Nuisan Declared. The following are hereby declared public nuisances whenever they may be found within the City: (1) Any living or standing Elm tree or part thereof infected to any degree with the Dutch Elm disease fungus Ceratocystis - Ulmi (Buisman) Moreau or which harbors any of the elm bark beetles Scolytus Multistriatus (Eichh.) or Hylurgopinus Ru f ip e s (Marsh); (2) Any dead tree or - part thereof, including Lugs, branches, stumps, firewood or other Elul material from which the bark has not been removed and burned or treated with an effective Elm bark beetle insecticide; and (3). Other shade trees with epidemic diseases of shade trees. It is unlawful for any person to permit any public nuisance, as herein d to remain on any premises owned or controlled by him with the City. 510.040 Procedure for Removal of Infected T rees and W ood _ t henever the City Hananer or his agents find with r easonable certainty that the infesta- tion, as defined in Section 510.030 exists in any tree or ggood on any public or private place in the City he shall notify the property ounier and the person in possession if different from the owner on which such tree or wood stands by Certified klai1, or personal service, that the nuisance must be abated within a specified time, not less than five days from the date of mailing such notice, or from the date of service. If the • oximer, or occupant, shall fail to remove the :infected tree or good from his or her property within. the tir.�e specified in said notice, the City Manager may order the work done e1rber by the City's employees. or by contract, and the cost of said work sha-U be billed against the owner, or occupant. 510.050 • Assessment_ for Nuisance Abatement. if the owner, or occupant shall fail to pay the bill, as provided for in Section 51 within thirty clays, the Council may then assess the amount due, plus imterest, against the property as a special assessment under Minnesota Statutes.. 51 0.060 Treatin Elm Trees. Whenever the City Hanger or his agents determine that any elm tree or elm wood , the City is= inf eeted with Dutch Elm fungus, he may -treat all nearby high value elm trees with an effective elm hark beetle destroying concentrate. Treating activities a!thorized by this Section shall be conducted in accordance with technical . d expert opinions and P lans of the Commissioner of Agriculture : re and under t supervision of the CoMMissioner and his agents whenever possible. The notice provisions of Section ,510.040 apply to treating operations conducted under this Section. 5I0.070 1�c4ns ortin� Elm �•'ood Proliibited. It is dai ?ful for any r' person to transport within. the City and barltbearing elan d, which is known b Y S the Ci Manager, or his agents, to be infected or suscted of being infected without having obtained a permit from the City eager, the City � Manager shall rant such permits only when the purposes of this ordinance wi13. g . - be served thereby. 510.080 interference Prohibited. It is unlataf ul any person to P ' y event in or interfere with the City Manager or his mUents while they are .. engaged .n the performance of duties imposed by this Ordiumce. This ordinance shall be enf orced and take of f ect f rcm1 and of ter its adoption and publication as is required by law. gassed by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota this 21st day of February 1974. 11a y r of eity of M aplewood Attest: . City' Clerl: Ayes I:a }�:: - 0 r° 74 TO City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development Action by C o - - i SUBJECT: Plan Update DATE: April 23, 1982 Endorsed .. Igo dif led-, ..,... _. i Req uest Rejected R Data_____. r Approval of the Maplewood Comprehensive ve P1 n (This • _ P a Update. updat e includes the Barton Aschman Transportation Study and the 1980 Sewer Plan r Past Actions ( See enclosed resolutions and ' minutes. } 4-6-81: The Planning Commission approved the Plan Update, 8 -6 -81: Council accepted the Plan Update with several amendment s. 10-15 Council accepted several more additions 2- 11 -82: The Metropolitan Council approved the Plan, March-April 1982: The Planning Commission held hearings and made the following amendments to the Plan, (Land use designations are defined on a e 18- 18- 32 ): p 9 28 to 1 . Cope Avenue park site: P to RL (p. 19 -15 ) 2. Revisions to the trail map: (p. 15 -10) 3. Hill crest Development property: RM to RL on the Y northerly portion -19) 4. White Bear Avenue, Lar enteur Avenue t 17) P o Frost Avenue. LSC to RL and RB (p.19- 5. Ryan Equipment property (Whi Bear Ave.): OS t (p.19-15) o BW 6. Omit. a minor collector east of Afton Heights Park 19 -.23 9 ) 7. Amend the acre • age charts. to reflect changes in the land use maps. (p.19-3) p Comments Council is required by State law to adopt the Plan b November 11 1982. N Y o further hearings are required. Council may adopt the Plan now, make revisions (a hearing should then be held or schedule � ns Commission, held), edul e a work session with the Planning Commi The- green pages in the Plan Update -are those with changes since the joint me ' 9 meeting wit-h the Planning Commission in 1980. Recommendation -, When Council is ready to approve the Comprehensive Plan Update, I recommend adoption of the enclosed resolution (attachment one), s y r mb Enclosures: 1. Resolution. 2. April 6, 1981 Resolution .3. August 6, 1981 Minutes 4. October 15, 1981 Resolution 5. Letter from Met Council - 2 - Attachment One RESOLUTION APPROVING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Land Planning ct Minnesota - g nnesota Statutes ,� Sects on 4730851- 473.872, requires that the Cit y of Maplewood ewood re are and- ' p p p submit a comprehensive. plan to the Metropol i tan Council ; and - WKEREAS, the Planning Commission approved • _ g pp the Plan Update on April 6, 1981 . ;and t WHEREAS, the Planning ng Commi ssi on approved amendm . PP on Jul 20, September 21 , and October 5, 1981 ; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission approved further her amendments on March 15, April 5 and April 19, 1982; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council reviewed the Plan on February ary 11 , 1982, and WHEREAS, all requirements of the Metropolitan i tan ' met; p Land Plann Act have been NOW, THEREFORE,. does the City Council ap prove the Comprehensive pp Plan Update as amended, including the. Barton Aschman Study and the 1980 Sewer Plan. Adopted this day of s 1982. Mayor ATTEST: Cl erk. — (SEAL RESOLUTION ADOPTI TH E COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION WHEREAS, the Metropol i tan • Land Planning ng Act re ui to prepare comprehensive 7 ans Q res local governmental • p and submit them to the Metropolit 0 review; and tropoli tan. Counci 1 for WHEREAS, - these -pl ans enti tled Ei ty �of.- Maplewood ' Com prehens i ve � Cb�nprehens� ve Sewer Plan rep mprehensi ve Pl an d the re ui rem the response to the City Mapl ewood _ q ents o.f. -the Metro of i to ty of to p n Land Planning -Act- an - d WHEREAS, four neighborhood • . h 9 hood public hearings w notice; and 9 were held with required legal . ga1 WHEREAS, these plans were sent - ent to all adjacent or of j urisdict ions fect October 2l , 1980. for - review and comment on Be it hereby resolved b y the Maplewood ewoo d P 1 a n n i n o f • the ��1ap1 ewood Comprehens� including 9 Comma ss ion- that the u be ad �Ve Plan, the r Plan opted with all approved am Comprehensive Sewer P endments. lan Adopted b the - y Maplewood Pl anning n Commi • 9 ssion this 6th day • J' April ] , 19 81. Attested by: Geof Olson, Secretary l . y � Lester Axdahl , Chairman n 3. Plan Update Review 6 g I a. Manager Evans. presented the staff report, w b. Mayor Greavu introduced the f o ' llowin resolution and moved its ad ti on: tion: 81 - 8 - 166 WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Lan ` d Planning Act requires local overn units to prepare comprehensive laps a - g mental P and submit them to the ; Metropolit :for review and P n Council WHEREAS, the Metropolitan • P n Council has requested additional info ,for the Plan Update; and rmation WHEREAS, these additions were adop by the City of Maplewood Plannin Commission on Jul 20 P July , 1981, following a public hearing w' notice; and g ith required legal WHEREAS, these additions were considered and accepted, but not adopted by the City Council on August 6 198 S 1• NOW THEREFORE, does the City ounc' adopt the followin y i1 accept and the Planning Commission g additions to the Comprehensive Plan Update 10 . Pages- of the Planning nv g entory, prepared by Midwest Plannin and Research, g 2. The information on wastewater flow projections in the June 29 1981 memorandum from Edwin A. Smith of Tolt2 K' ' Associates, Inc. ing� Duvall, Anderson and 3. A number 6 is added to 3 page 2 of the Sewer Plan as follows: tv Re quire percolation tests and soil borin s before equire . g re issuing permits." 4• "The City will comply with �� Mn/DOT rules concerning obstructions air navigation. to 5 • "The Maplewood Transportation Plan, done by Barton- Aschman in 1979 is adopted as part of the Plan U dat ' shall apply wherever a P e, except that the Plan Update conflict occurs between the two." In addition, the Director of Community Development is authorized and directed to submit the comments in his memorandum of July 7, 1981 and the additions to the Plan Update to the Chairman of Section 473.175 of t the Metropolitan Council for review under he Metropolitan. Land Plannin g Act. Seconded by Councilman Bastian. Ayes - all, Councilman Bastian moved to suspend the Rules of Procedures and exten ast -the stated deadlinee d the meetin Seconded by Council person P Juker. Ayes - all. - Resolution Pertaining to Additions to the Plan Update WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Land nd Planni ng Act r local over units to prepare comprehensive ve 1 ans and - 9 nmenta 1 f p submit them to the Metropol i tan Cou ' or review; and _ P nc�l 1 has requested WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council information � adds t� onal � the Plan Update, and for r WHEREAS, these additions were d • . adopted by the Ci of Maplewood Planning Corr�n� ss � on on September 21 and October 5 - with requi legal notice; and 1981, following owe ng a public c heari n n 9 � NOW, THEREFORE, does the City Counci ac - t the fol l o accept and the Planning ng Corr�n� ss i on adopt wing additions ons to the Comprehensive Plan . Update. 7 . -Del eti on of the I -494 and Century ry Avenue interchange, 2. Amending the Maplewood Heights Neighborhood g �ghborhood Plan to designate the area between Lydia Avenue, Woodl n • y n Avenue, and Are e1 Street for Rm, Residential Medium use. 3. Establish a 1985 and 1 ' 990 phasing ng plan. Adopted by the City Council this 15th da y of October, 1981. J n reavu, M ayor Lester Axdahl, Chairman Planning Commission Attest: Attest: Lucille Aurelius, City Clerk Geof son, AICP Direc or ,of Community Development February 22, 1982 Geoff Olson, Director Cammun ity Development City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Ave. Maplewood, MN 55109 RE City of Maplewood Comprehensive Plan Review Metropolitan Council Referral F i l e No. 8585 -2 Dear Mr. Olson: hta o � 0 0 kd. �I N CIT1�' 300 Metro Square Building Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 Telephone 612/291- 6359 At its meeting on February 11, 1982 the Metropolitan itan ' p C ouncil 1 con s � dered the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan. This consideration was based on a report of the Physical Development Committee, Referral Report No. 81 -247. A co o copy f this repor which was adopted as presented, is attached. The Council adopted Resolution No. 82 -34 which provides for adop p of this report and the recommendations contained on pages 15 and 16 of the rep These recommendations are as follows: That the City of Maplewood be advised that: A. This report constitutes the C o u n ' c i l ' s official review required under the Metropolitan 1 i t an Land P (MLPA), p Planning � ng Act B. No Plan modifications are required pursuant to Minn. Statutes Sec. 473.175, Subd. 5. C. The .Plan is in conformance with metropolitan system P 1 ans for transportation, parks, and airports, and sewers. D. Maplewood should provide planned rowth data for the ' 9 e e � ght sewer service districts served by constrained flow facilities. This data should be a part of their CSP and should include location and timing of all local 1 ater al and trunk sewers and projected volume of sewage flow on an annual basis for at least the eight constrained sewer service areas. Concerns of neighboring cities are to be addressed in the CSP. On extentions of sewer service in an approved CSP will be allowed i n the eight c n PP constrained sewer service areas. Maplewood should address the concerns of the MWCC letter of November 3 1981 at the time the CSP is submitted for approval, The above information ma be p r ovided y as a Comprehen s Tve Plan amendment at a later date i f ' such information is not available today, y E. Comments provided by other jurisdictions are attached. The Ci of St. Paul has raised some concerns about inter-community flows which are addressed '- n the sewer sections of this review. An Agency Created to Coordinate the Planning and Development of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Comprising- . Anoka County O Carver County O Dakota County O Hennepin County O Ramsey County O Scott County O Washington County An Equal Opportunity Employer Geoff Olson, Director February 22, 1982 Page Two vita a � Cti 0 0 �1 N Cl 300 Metro Square Building Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 Telephone 612/291- 6359 F. The Plan relates to other chapters of the Metropolitan i tan D v Guide P Development chapters as follows: 1. Metropolitan Development Framework a. The Plan's forecast for. population, households and emplo P yment are consistent with Development Framework forecasts. b.. The Plan's land use designations and land demand estimates are consistent with the policies appl icable to an area of planned urbanization. C. The P1 an does not show the timing and staging n of land use 9 9 s expected . t0 develop by 1990. The City should closely onitor land develop y in those areas with both sewer constraints and high velopment projections and provide land use timing and staging onsistent with 9 in 9 th .regional plans either in plan amendments or i n ' the City's Comprehensive Sewer Plan, 2* Investment Framework a. The capital improvement programs are in conformance with the definition of a capital improvement program in NSA 473.852 g ' Subdivision 4, except that estimated amounts should be included for each year and for each revenue source for 0 street, sanitary sewer and storm sewer improvements and information on the need and the financial impact shou �inc 1 uded for all projects, should be b. To improve the capital improvement r ro am the City should p g � y add a schedule of annual principal interest nterest payments necessary to retire the outstanding indebtedness in future plan revisions . c. At such time as the City amends its ca r y capital i provement program fat least biennially), it should send =a copy to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment as-required in Minnesota Statutes 473.852, Subd. 4. 3. The Plan is consistent with the Hous i n chapter . g of the MDG and the Council's s Environmental Protection plan and of icies. Any y new ordinances should be submitted pursuant to MS 273.206 to the Council for review prior to final adop p n. An Agency Created to Coordinate the Planning and Development of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Comprising Anoka County O Carver County O Dakota County O Hennepin County O Ramsey County O Scott Count O Washington ount 3' 8 y An Equal Opportunity Employer vita, o 0 0 Geoff Ol son, Di rector`" �'�► February '22 1982 Pa9e Three f N CIT 30.0 Metro Square Building Saint Paul Minnesota , nneso r to 55101 Telephone 612/291- 0359 The Land Planning Act requires that th City of Maplewood adopt its Compreh Plan within nine months of f the completion of the Metropolitan review of the Plan The Council should has occu ould be formally advised when such action • occurred. If there are substantial chang ' adopt � on, please note thes Council 9 made � n the Plan before e when you notify the of the P • Plan's s adopt � on . Sincerely, METROPOLITAN COUNCIL GC/s Charles R. Weaver Chairman CRW: vv Attachment cc: Barry Evans, Manager, City f Maplewood Y p ewood Affected School Districts Adjacent Communities Ramsey and Washington Counties Ray Odde, Metropolitan Waste Control ' Co�� s s i on Fred Ta nzer, Regional Coordinator, Mn /DOT Mary Youl e, CPD Representative HUD Romi S lowi ak, Metropolitan Council 1 Staff An Agency Created to Coordinate the Planning and Development of the Anoka .County o Carver County O Dakota County O Hennepin County n Cities Metropolitan Area Comprising; P ty O Ramsey County O Scott County O Washington County An Equal Opportunity Employer C . Cope Avenue Park Si to (P to Rm) Secretary Olson read the notice of public hearing, The request ' q 1s to revise the Plan Update to Rm. Associate Planner Johnson discussed th proposal with the Commission. John Kavanagh, owner, requested approval of the change to Rm. Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone else P resent who wished _to comment. _ y David O'Connor, 1575 E. Sandhurst Drive, questioned why he Ci t Y y �Woul d not purchase the property at the price requested by the owner. Public Works Director Haider said the property went through the condemnation procedure, the price the Courts decided was more than the City's appraisal was. The City, therefore, felt they could not afford to purchase the property. The condemnation proceedings were dropped. Mr. O'Connor asked if there was another plan for a park in the area to trade off the density. Secretary Olson showed the City Park Plan to Mr. O'Connor, Amos Haynes, 1625 E. County Road B, said he had a problem with drainage for quite some time before it was corrected. He asked if there would be high density structures constructed on the property if it is designated to Rm. He also questioned if the development would cause addi tional drainage problems for the neighborhood.. Secretary Olson explained what type of units are permitted in an area designated Rm. Public Works Director Haider said the City has an overall drainage plan for the City. There could be the p o s s i b i l i t y of a storm sewer project as a result of complete development of the site. Mr O'Connor said when there is a heavy rain there is a water The fol l owi ng indicated the would rather have the - proper • p pe ty remain as open space., _ also questioned what was proposed for devel on the property, commented on the drainage pattern in the neighborhood: Mark Si gmundi k, 1613 Sandhurst Joe Timmer, 1621 Sandhurst Jim Walstrand, 1611 E. Sandhurst Joe Whenni s, 1581 E.` Sandhurst Daryle Erear, 2255 Hazelwood Steve Elias, 1467 Lark - - - - - Betty Smith, 2279 Hazelwood - - - -- Dennis Petersen, 1480 Lark Patricia. Crescent, 2209 Kennard Charles Boyles, 1445 Lark -_ Paul Peltier, 1536 Lark _ Gary Fruth, 1453 Lark Myrtle Hughes, 1546 Laurie 3 3 -15 -82 i Jim Perrier, 1510 Cope Betty Schmidt, 2239 ' Hazel wood P h i l i p James Hazelwood and Cope George Moore, 2194 Hazelwood Mrs. John 'Davis, .2210 Hazelwood .Chairman Axdahl closed the ublic hearing ' • P ng portion of the -meets ng. The Commission discussed the a ' l tornative uses suggested by the - neighborhood residents for the . pro ert P y Commissioner Ki shel moved the Planning ' g Comm�ssion recommend to the City Council that the site in question be redesignated f based on the r or an Rm use recommendation of the City Attorney as it relates to the litigation on the property.. Commi ssi oner Pel l i s h seconded The Commission reviewed the history as to • y why the Rm designation was applied , to the property in the original Comprehensiv v om P .e Plan. Some of the C om m ission ssi on members indicated cated what Land Use designation the rather than 9 y would prefer Rm. i Commissioner Fischer moved the Plan • Plannin Commi ssion table this i tem to obtain additional information on the litigation and an ' the Parks COtlYlli opi on from ssi on regards ng a parti park as opposed to a total park- in the area and also how close the City w ' y s w� th t heir r offer for purchasing the property. Commissioner wh i tcomb seconded - Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, El lefson, Fischer, Howard, Pell ish, Prew. Sletten W hitcomb Abstained - Commissioner Ki shel A • P Amendment (continued): Coe Avenue • P e Park Site Associate Planner Johns reviewed Sta on evi ewe'd the Proposal with the Comm' ff is recor�mendi rig desi designating i ssi on. Densit 9 g the Property to RL, Resi denti a y. 1 Lower Chairman Prew asked for . o comments from any interested parties, _ John Kavanagh reviewed - . g some of the history reg arding n hi s the request. He reviewed .the .1 g 9 Property and -letter he had forwarded tor - the Planning m� ss� on .dated February 7, 1981 which re rig Comm . nation f quested no change in the Land Use designation or the property. He said there �hav a been a number of cha nges made for the property in the Land Use designation... He economics should be considered dered w designation thought when making a land use t on property. as it would not be feas to construct single r homes on the property. He requests the property be redesignated Rm. David O'Connor, 1.575 F. Sandhurst • would . ere will )1 b � felt that multiple pl a Bevel o merit cause adds t� ona7 traffic The • traffic P • r additional w� with the townhouse project presently under construction in the area. He did not think there was suff park land in the area no to have the property remain as park hand , w• He wished . Resident, 1510 Cope Avenue indicated - .he was � n favor of Low Dens i t y. Chairman Prew closed the p ublic ' p c hearing, The Commi ssion. questioned if this would be an area where a PUD could an RL area to preserve some of the nat property. u ra 1 features of the Secretary Olson said it could be p ossible p ssible to use a PUD to presery some of e the open area around the and as requested surrounding property P q ested by some of the 9 p perty owners. The Commission reviewed the land use • • e des�gnat� ons of the surroundin property in the neighborhood. g Commissioner Barrett moved the P1 an Cit Coun - n1n r designation nati on of Blocks 8 9 Addition to . north St. Paul from P to R ark and R� L - Residential Lower Density -- Comani ss i oner Whitcomb seconded Ayes Whitcomb, Pel l i sh, Prew, Fischer Nays - Motion carries 5 - 2 Commission recommend to the and 10 of Sm Tgylor5 n, Residential Medium Densit - Commissioners Barrett, Commissl oners Howard, Sletten A. Revisions to the Trail Map (Park and Recreation Comi s s i on The Parks. Commission is requesting a revision to the trail map in the Plan Update. Staffs recommendation is included in their report. Dean Sherburne, Parks and Recreation Commission 1078 Marnie Street said the Commission has no problem with the two changes proposed. They have also proposed an off street trail down Highwood from the street in the . proposed Leonard's Oak Hills Addition. Commissioner Pel l i sh moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Parks and Recreation Commission trail map proposal with the following. changes: 10 Omit the east -west trail between Kohlman Lake and Highway 61. 2. Realign the proposed off - street bike path at the northwest corner of Larpenteur Avenue and Sterling Street to run north of the pond and inter- sect with Sterling Street. Also, there should be a north- south trail added which would provide a link between Maplewood Junior High School and Larpenteur. . Avenue. 3. An off street trail to be designated from proposed Leonard's Oak Hills addition , down H i ghwood . Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl. , Barrett, El lefson, Fischer, Howard, Ki shel , Pel l i sh, Prew, Sl eaten, Whitcomb. T B. Hill crest Development Property (Rm to RL) r Secretary Olson read the notice of public hearing. Associate - P1'anner Johnson said the request is to change the ' 1 and use designation to RL, Residential Lower Density. Secretary Olson read a letter received from the Mayor of the Cit y of St. Paul relative to the proposed change. Geoff Jarpe, attorney representing Hillcrest Development, reviewed the previous discussion with the Planning Commission and the history of the property. One of the reasons they object to the decrease in density on the property is that property in the neighborhood has been changed from RL to Rm to permit higher density on that property. They feel a compromise between the R -3 zoning,whi ch was originally on the property, and RLisRm. The Commission and Secretary Olson discussed the land use designations for the surrounding property, the )zoning of the property and also what the property was designated for in the 1973 Comprehensive Plan, The Commission discussed with Mr. Jar a the previous Bevel o ment p P P proposals. :.zoning and land use designations .for . the property. Commissioner Prey . moved the Planning Commission recommend changing n 9 9 the Land Use Plan designation for parcel -3 to RL, parcels 1 and -2 to - -- -=- be-Rm. _ - - - - -- - -. - Commissioner Pel l i sh seconded Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl , Barrett, El l efson, Fischer, Howard, Ki shel , Pel 1 i sh, Prew, S1 etten, Whitcomb 2 3-15-82 �. rrcir wirerrtrrj�e - wnize d ear Avenue (Larpenteur to Frost) Secretary lson read the notice f • y e o publi hearing. It �s proposed to amend the Comprehensive Plan to change the land use designation from om LSC to RL. Staff is recommending changing to RB, Residential Business Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment nt regarding the proposed change. Paul Holt, 1895 White Bear Avenue asked _ - � when the property � was chan ged.to LSC. _ _w Secretary O1 son explained the difference • - g and Land Use designations, zon _ e esignat�ons. r Mr. Holt said they would like ke to have the area r ' . r res�denti-a]. Erin Martin, 1865 White Bear Avenue, also wished the property to remain residential. They do not wish an office building next to them. Mrs. Donley 1834 Fl andrau also req • q e d the property remai n res Walter Pehos ki , 1772 Fl andrau, said if the r - property rty i s to be both commercial and r esident ial al i t would resent more r the p eopl e' e' 1 i vi p p ems for P P living on Flandrau. Harry Johnson, 1717 7 Whi to Bear Avenue asked w initiated � � ho the proposed change. The Commission explained the procedure in establishing the hearing, Mr. Johnson said he is in favor of the ro osed change commercial. P P nge to go more Mr. Donley, 1834 Flandrau, would 1 i-ke the ro ert res ht a sur residents P P y He thought survey of Fl andrau should also be taken. Larry Bothwell 1922 Fl andrau, he thought it i s best 9 to use a street as a dividing l i n e between commercial and residential rather that at mid block. Commercial development would add more traffic to Whi to Bear Avenue and also Frost and Lar, pente ur. Mr. Johnson, 1726 Fl andrau not in fa • favor of any commercial use of the property. Thought commercial development would r ' a r result i n trash i n the y ard s, additional traffic and so forth. Mr. Bothwell said he thought the worst alternative would d be to have a mixture of commercial and residential, Margaret Wal z, 1644 Fl andrau, would rather have the area stay r residential, - Mike Carver, 1733 White Bear Avenue, indicated he woul- d rather have commercial building next to him than the rental r i s now there. p ope rty wh � ch , Mr. rl ei n, 1741 E. Larpenteur Avenue, op to a c a residen 1702 F1 andrau wh i o Pp �Y h nge, wants t al .. He also presented a 1 etter from the property r p P y owner of o wished the property to rema� n res Mr s ,. Greczyba, 1812 F1 andrau, wished shed the property to remain residential p p y a n �r Mrs. Greczyba, 1812 F1 andrau, wished the property to remain residential She suggested the notice to property owners should be more descriptive, Mr. Johnson, 1726 F1 andrau said they were surveyed as to the proposed change. Councilman Anderson commented on the proposed Plan Amendment and the reason for requesting the Planning Commission to revi the land use designation for this area of White Bear Avenue. He indicated he had surveyed the property owners three times. Each time the re ues t for residential use has been less. Beverly Gustafson, her parents l i v e at 1753 white Bear Avenue, they wish the property to remain residential, Chairman Axdahl closed the public hearing portion of the meeting. The Commission discussed the uses permitted in the RB district and also where the Comprehensive Plan recommends transition from one type of land use to another. r� The Commission discussed with Staff the advanta es and disadvantages • 9 in using the Business Residential designation and what type of residential uses would be permitted. They al so reviewed the history of the various zone changes proposed. Commissioner Barrett Planni.nq Commission recommend to nci they amend the Land Use Plan from LS Limited ervi ce Commercial to RL Residential Lower Densi t y for the are 1 -yi ng west of White Bea A venue bet ween Frost and Laroenteur Avenues based on the 1. Preserve the existing single dwelling character of these properties and those abutting to the west. 2. Reduce the potential for median being installed along White Bear Avenue, 3. The storm sewer system in White Bear Avenue is inadequate for further commercial development 4. Allowing individual commercial driveways, without median control, would cause unacceptable traffic conflicts 5. The above traffic conflicts would further increase with the higher anticipated volume of commercial traffic. Commissioner Fischer - seconded r Commissioner Ki shel and Prew indicated the believed the-p would y eventually be developed as commercial, it may take 5 to 10 years. The change will result from a zone change request. They al so commented on the purpose of a Comprehensive Plan . Voting on the motion: Prew, Whitcomb, Axdahl Ki shel ,Pell l i sh,Howard Motion fails for lack of majorit Ayes - Commissioners Barrett, Fischer, Nays - Commissioners Ell of son, He j ny, 4 -5 -82 The CoTmnissioners commented on what type of land use designation they felt was appropriate and the.reasons why. Commissioner Ki shel moved the 'Pl anni n Commission recommend to the, City . Council that the land along white Bear Avenue from Frost Avenue to Lar enteur Avenue on the west side be desi ted Residential Business RB for the reason that there is a mixture of need and wi i ve the Ci t Council an opDortunit - y to consider chap es that will slowly place, 7_ Commissioner Ellefson seconded Commissioner Prew d an amendment to have the - property from f - L.ar enteur Avenue north to 1829 White Bear Avenue be designate as R. t Property from 1831 White Bear Avenue north to Frost Avenue __be designated RL. Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl , Barrett El l efson, Fischer, : He j ny, Howard, Ki shel , Pel l i sh , Prew, Whitcomb Voting on the motion as amenued: Ayes - Cor.mi ss i oners 'Axdahl , Barrett El l efson, Fischer, Hejny, Howard, Ki shel Pel 1 i s Prew, Whitcomb B. Plan Amendment - Ryan Equipment Secretary Olson read the notice of ubl i c hear' - na P hearin Staff � s recommend redesi g tion of the site from OS and LSC to BW Business War sing, ' eh ou The Commission discussed with Secretary Olson n t ' he uses permitted under the B W desig nation, the methods that can be used to buff to the north and buff the residences setback required. Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone resent '- on the p rop os al. y P who w� � h ed to comment _ p p s al . Clay Jones, 2128 Prosperity, questioned if access allowed of would have to be f Prosperity as well as White Bear Avenue. He d Prosp erity was c di d not. think dra problem in the area that was designated ons c o nstructed to handle industrial type traffic. There a drai �s as open space. Mildred Grel i sh, 2111 Prosperity, t said p y, d when the property was changed to M -1 zoning, the neighbors signed the eti ti on with t r building, he understanding the only r eason was to expand the bui l d� ng, A resident from 2111 Prosperity asked how much more of the property could be developed Secretary said there is about 10 1/2 acres to the end on �:ne e site, �t would depend individual vi dual development proposal, Mr. Grel i sh also questioned possible -1 ocati ons of dri v wa - and a e ys , setbacks of buildings w hat procedures .would be followed to develop he pr operty, p Secretary Olson said Dick Pearson, a ro ert own - p P y owner � n the area, indicated Gated he was in favor of the proposal. W. F. Franz, 1750 Burke, commented on the drainage on the subject property. Additional work would have to be done to develop • - p the property. He is concerned that he would receive an assessment for additional drainage that exists d into Wage work. The building does fit into the area. He would refer not to h a building constructed on the p have • e property that would not be designed prop erly rl to be adjacent to a residential al area. P y Director of Public Works Haider the area under ' en S consideration was considered as O p p ce under the design of County Ditch 17 construction. If more intense use would be contemplated for the property, the developer would b the additional ti ono] ondi n ne c e ssary P e creating P g essary and would probably have to pay for. it himself. It would depend on what Council's ' c ] s dec � s i on would be, Norm Anderson, 1603 Frost Avenue, said the ro r Prosperity a P pe ty owners along Burke and Pros p y ssumed the property would stay as it is open space. should � P P e. He feels the p remain open space. Any more intense building in the area would have an affect on Count • on . n y D itch ] 7. Another cons derat� - rs the proposal. to construct warehous on the ea ' J� give east side of Why to Bear venue. __ He requested the Commission give consi derati o to Space des' n leave the Open p designation,* Ri strom, 2120 Prosperity, said the o • p nd�ng on the east side of White to Bear Avenue does drain across to the ondi ng on the west side and then into P to the ditch, t ch . Mr. Grel i sh, 2111 Prosperity, commented on the drainage Wage in the area. With additional development, there would be additional roblems ' drains P with e. 9 Chai rman Axdahl closed the publi hearing portion of the meeting. The Commission asked if there was a proposal in the drainage plan to have any of this property become publ drainage. _ Director Haider said no, there is no need for' additional drainage if Y� y the property- remains open space. Pon ng would be reviewed at the time , of the site review of any proposed development. Commission indicated that one consideration in leaving the property c' designated as Open Space would be an indication to a potential developer that some kind of special conditions exist at the site, therefore, q requiring special designs during development planning. Commissioner Prew moved the Planning Comm si n r nd t x d at the en i re a EQUIDM en E PrDn a Space and Limited Service Commercial to BW Business Wa r usi Commissioner Kishel seconded Ayes Commissioners Axdahl Barrett, El 1 efson, Fischer, He jny, Howard, Ki shel , Pel l i sh, Prew, Whitcomb D. Omit a Minor Collector East of Afton ' M - n Nei ghts Park Secretary Olson read the. notice of ubl is hearin P g. I t s proposed to eliminate the minor collector street designation 1 i lying west of Century Avenue and north of Upper Afton Road. Associate Planner Johnson fu ex explained the proposal. rth P _ Chairman Axdahl asked if there was a • r�yone present who wished hed to comment on the proposal. - Commi ssi oner Pell i sh moved the Planning Commission r_ecorrrnend to remove the minor collector designation from -Sterling Street Mao La _t�la hi l 1 Road � Ma L ane and - __ Y , lyi ng in the ne ghborhood west of Century venue and Hof Upper Afton Road Y north PP . tommi ssi oner Fischer seconded Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl , Barrett, Ellefson, Fischer, Howard, Kishel, Pel1ish Prew, Sl tt ' , e en ,. Whitcomb tcomb 4 3 -15 -82 fill CO Plan Amendment - Acreage Chart i .fl J g. Secretary Olson read the notice of public hearing. The proposal is to update the land use acreage chart. Staff is. recommending that a this item be tabled until April 19 until action i s taken on the Cope Avenue Park Site. Commi ss i one r Barrett moved the Planninq Commiss la until A ri 1 19 - - Commissioner El 1 efson seconded Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, E1lefson, Fischer, He j ny, Howard, Ki steel , Pel l i sh, Prew, Wh-i tcomb a i B. Plan Amendment (continued): Acreage Chart Associate Planner Johnson said staff has reviewed the P1 an amendments and revised the acreage chart as shown in - their report, Commissioner Sletten ni n Commission recmnend t ` he Cat Staff revise the acres e chart to include the 3 -2--81 throw h -5- 2 d the - redes i nation . of the Coe Avenue Park rk Si to s• Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - Commissioners Barrett Fischer, Scher, Howard, Pellish, Prew, Sletten, Whitcomb MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate SUBJECT: - Planner Ord inance -Metal Build DATE: June 15, 1982 Buildings Request .A ct L on by Coijnci Endorsed MGdified... _ Rejected, D'at e The City Council on May 20 1982 ' rected staff to amendment Y � � di prepare an ordi prohibiting the erection of an new Hance Maplewood, and to y of building dinmetal pol buil dings di ngs i n rest the constructs on s ' exteriors to N1 -1, Li res ht Manufacturing, M-2, 9 w� wi metal Bus 9• stricts. Heavy Manufacturing an ss Commercial dig d BC, Comments The reason for area prohibiting metal • Pol b are also referred to pole buildings di ngs i s s imply esthetics, P buildings, di ngs , which Metal buildings" r as "pole barns and agr� - appropriate ate for rural areas because of their design, but are not well suited for urban l ocatio ns m 1 es where they would be highly visible, Examples bui 1 di n p of this style of metal building re th may • a e Keller Golf Course g and Blake Excavating ' s garag For purposes of definition the � e term metal pole building" should not b used. Not all metal buildings which h e g have the "pole building" di ng" appearance are structurall supported by verti cal of es or • P columns. Able Mi Stora e and Big A Auto Parts are examples of metal buildin s which g pole bui l d i ngs since they are not g are not considered physically supported in this fashion Alternatives (From most to least restrictive) I . Prohibit metal pole bui l-di n s altogether. • g ogether Thy s would eliminate Hato the chances of any new such buildings bean built i degree of design . g n .areas where a higher de g gn i s being maintained nta i ned or des i red . The disadvantage i s that metal of ' from areas P e bui 1 di ngs would then be prohibited where they would .not not impact • borhood. Y p t the surrounding ne�gh- II. Leave the decision of a metal � design and com Community u�ld�ng s desi atibilit mun� ty Des � gn Revi Board. The ordinance Y to the specifically state t Hance could be amended to he City's concern with this type give the Board specific authority YP of structure. and to r� tY to deny a proposal � f � t 1 s found to with the area. be incompatible Al ternative I I i i s the proposal rive • 5- 20 -820 p ously considered by Council on Staff - has included two ordinance amendments for the Council's review and compari son. Recommendation Both proposals appear to be effective. for approval, Either one, therefore, is recommended jW Enclosures 2 REFERENCE INFORMATION 0 Existing Code 1. The existing ' code does not restrict metal o - 1 a buildi di Code p ngs , except for Building requirements. i rements . 20 Section 202.200 of the Community Design n Review Board . g Ordnance states the following: -Z "The Board may, from time to time at its discretion recomm m � nd to the Planning Commis ssi on that certain special community design review area sp c cry tern g s and that s p a to be considered i n reviewing applications for development within said areas be established. The Plannin ' g omm�ssion shall review such recommen ons and shall recommend approval, modification or denial of same to the Village Council. The ' Village.Council shall take the final action on all such recommendations and may designate said resolution." y 9 areas by Surue Staff surveyed twenty surrounding metropolitan ( communities. enclosed . Of the cities s urveyed, four rohibited meta ' p 1 pole bui ldings and sixteen permitted them. The majority of.those cities which p ermit me : buil dings, though h p me tal , use. pole 9 g they do not prohibit t them by ordi nance , d thei Inventory Refer to the inventory of existing metal pole b • p buildings d� ngs � n the Ci and the enclosed pictures of seven or these structures. The hoto ra h numbered and p g p s have been correspond to this key: 1. 2. Big A Auto Parts Able Mini Storage 47 So. Century Avenue 1800 Gervais Court 3, Quality Cabinets 2672 Highway 61 4. Don's Paint &Body Shop 2732 Highway 61 5. Keller Golf Course 2166 Highway 61 6. Carver General Repair 2730 Highwood Avenue 7. .Residential Garage 1240 So. Sterling Avenue Procedure 1. Community Design Review Board recommendation. 2. City Council hearing and first reading, 9 3. City Council hearing and second reading, Mb Enclosures: 1, Proposed Ordinance I 2, Proposed Ordinance. II 3. Survey 4, Metal Pole Building Inventor - 3 - I ORDINANCE N0, AN ORDINANCE AMEMDMENT REGULATING THE REVIEW OF METAL POLE BUILDINGS - The City Council of the City,of Map lewood d • p does hereby ordain as follows SECTION 1. Section 202.240 of the � • as follows: Ma plewood Code i s hereby added to read .20 2.040 SPECIAL AREAS 1. It shall be unlawful to ere • erect a metal buildng in the City of Maplewood which has an exterior of metal anel s over • p at least 80q of the building,, ng,, and which is of a design commonly referred to as a " - metal pole bui l di ng, ".pale barn" or "agr� -building." 1 d1 n ,'' unless such • 9 building would be located �n a F Farm Residence District or unless such building commonly u i s a metal storage building y ed as a backyard storage shed. Should an dispute ' over the classification of .a Y pute are se . proposed metal building, the Director of Community Development shall determine whether • �� er the proposed metal build d� ng fits, into the "metal pole buildi category. Appeals ' of the Director's decision shall be made to the City Council for a determi of building type. uilding 2. Buildings having metal_ exteriors b • a b not being of the typical pole building ding design, may only be allowed in areas zone L M ed BC, Busin C ommerc i al, M - 1 s g Manufacturing and M -2, Heavy Manufacturing. Spec • g arch tectural design and non metal decorative modifications shall be required to - compati bi 1 i ty with surrounding de velopment q assure . SECTION 2. Thi s ordi nance shal 1 take effec • ublica t from 'any after its passage and p i ton. Passed by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota this day of 1982, Mayor Attest: erk Ayes - Nays - II ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGULATING THE REVIEW OF BUILDINGS The Council of the City of Maplewood does hereby ordain as follows (additions are underlined): Section 1. Section 202.180 of the Maplewood C follows: p ode is hereby amended to read as 202.180 SUBMITTAL EVALUATION The Community Design Review Board shall review h • 1 ication t e materials submitted with the application with respect to the following aspects of the ro os • p p a1. 1. General site utilization. 2. General architectural considerations including • a review of. a. The height, bulk and area of all buildings on the site. te. b. The colors and materials to be used. c. The physical and architectural relationship of the pro posed and p P posed with existing proposed structures in the area. d. The site, layout, orientation and location of all buildings uildings and. structures and their relationship with open areas and h P th e topogra e. Height, materials, colors and variations in.boundar screen 1 y walls, fences or p antings. f. Appropriateness of sign design and exterior lighti 3. General landscaping considerations . 4. Graphics to be used. To recommend approval of an application the Board shall all make the following findings: 1. That the design and location of the ro osed d - • p p development and its relationship to neighboring or existing or proposed developments and r t aff�' c is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occu ation in P the neighborhood; that it w i l l not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoy- - or proposed � o ment of neighboring, existing y p p ed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. 2. That the design and location of the ro osed - • - P P development �s in keeping with the character of the surrounding nee hborhood and i s n g of detrimental to the 7. harmonious, s, orderly, and attractive development contemplated b h' ' and the Village Comprehensive P y t is ordinance g Municipal Plan. 3. That the design and location of the proposed • p posed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for r its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, i ti on materials, P � textures and .colors. 4. That metal buildings must be compatible with the character and quality of surroundin develo ment. Special architectural desi2n and non -metal decorative modifications sha e require to assure compati i ity Metal buildings may be prohibited - when found to be compatible with surrounding development. The Board in its recommended actions for approval _ pp val may. 10 Recommend any conditions that t i t deems reasonable to its action of approval. 2. Recommend that the applicant, as a • pp condition, provide guarantees that the conditions of approval will be complied with. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect from and ' publ i cati on. after its passage and Passed by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota this day of 3019 Mayor Attest: Clerk Ayes - Nays - -2- d METAL POLE BUILDINGS Survey of surrounding Metropolitan i�tan Conn P un ?ties Bei Closest to Maplewood in Population November 2, 1981 13. _ City 14. 1. Maplewood 2. St. Louis Park 3. Minnetonka 4. Richfield 5. Coon Rapids 6. Burnsville 70 Plymouth 8. Brooklyn Center 9. Fridley 10. B l a i n e 11. Crystal 12. New Brighton 13. New Hope 14. Golden V a l l e y 15. App Valley 16. Roseville 17. South St. Paul 18. Eagen 19. Maple Grove 20. Columbia Heights 21. White Bear Lake Prohibit Permit x x x x x front elevations must be archi tectual ly treated. x x x x (Commercial Dis- tricts) x x (Farm &Industrial Districts) x x Building. elevations facing streets and residential /and must be architecturally heated, x x x x x By Special Use Permit Only allowed in Indus. trial zones. X, x x .x INVENTORY OF EXISTING METAL POLE BUILDINGS March 16, 1982 1. 2. 3, 4. 5. 6, 7. 9. 10. 11 12. 13. 14 15. 16. 17, 18. 19. 20. Business or Use - Location- Quality Cabinets 2672 Highway 61 Blake Excavating- Maplewood Auto ' Clin�c 1201 Frost Avenue Mogren Bro thers Sod 2600 White Bear Avenue Abl Mini Storage 1800 Ge rva i s Court Sparkle Auto 3065 Highway 61 Keller Golf Course 2166 Highway 61 Sabota Landscaping 2036 Engli Street Capitol City Adventist School 1220 South McKnight Road Carver General Re a i�r p 2730 Hi hwood g Avenue Roger Fu1k Machine Sho 1810 Count y Road B Resident's personal ar g age 1262 McKnight Road .Country Side Vol kswa e en/SAAB (used car department . 1180 Highway g way 36 Donis Paint and Body Shop p 2 732 Highway 61 Big A Auto Parts 47 Century Avenue Ci of Maplewood Public Works • rks facility 1902 E. Count y Road B Truck U t i l i t i e s , 2370 English Street (building on H' Highway 36) Berg - Torseth - Ramsey County Department of Park Recreation sand Yocum Oil 21. Residential Garage 22* Group Health garage/shop 23. Oxford Disposal Service v ce c,s54 English Street (building on Highway 36) 2020 White Bear Avenue (Fairground) 2729 Stillwater Road (building on Geranium Avenue) 1240 South Sterling Avenue .: 2165 White Bear Avenue 2305 Linwood Avenue 24. Del ory Waterproofing g 250 Larry's Western Store 26. Beaver Brothers 27. Sport City .28. Schwi nn Bicycles 29. Quansut Hut at Old Jordon Farm 30. Construction Center Incorporated 31. Town and Country Trailer Park 32. Ethan Allan Gal l er y 33. Midwest Mobile Homes 34, Farm Residential Agri -Build n 9 35. Residential Garage 36. Ron's 66 37. Farm Residential Agri-Building 38. Farm Residential A ri -Bui l di 9 ng 39. Schroeder M i l k Company 40. Structural Wood Corporation 41. Art's Towi.na • 2095 E. Larpenteur Avenue 2205 E. County Road D 934 County Road C 2210 White Bear Avenue 2250 White Bear Avenue McKnight Road south of Upper Afton pp Rd. 2050 White Bear Avenue 2557 Highway 61 1111 E. Highway 36 .1081 E. Highway 36 2480 Linwood Avenue 873 So. Century Avenue 2086 Edgerton Street 2445 Carver Avenue 2413 Carver Avenue 2080 Rice Street 1175 Highway 36 2384 English Street - 2 - ') �1,71� MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: p Soo Line Abandonment DATE. June 21, 1982 Action by Pat A committee of staff people, e, re resenti n p representing Maplewood, St. Paul , Oakdale, North St. Paul Ramsey County, Washington County, DNR MnDOT Council, h y � � a nd Metropo 1 � to n have been meeting over the last few months to discuss the feasibility all or art of eas�bility of acquiring p the Soo Li ne Rai 1 rand r�i ght -o f - way for a bike trail, A task force is needed to negotiate with the railroad • l road and develop a financing ng plan to pay for the right -of -way. The first meeting of - 9 the task force w ill be on J une 30 from 4 :30 to 6:00 p.m. A representat from Maplewood appointed, P should be p St r MEMORANDUM ' Jo,--- . 3 Action by Council: TO: City Manager � D of Communit ndorse .._ FROM: n� ty Development Modif SUBJECT: Board of Appeals and Adjustments DATE. June 1, 1982 Rejected ._ Date M The City Council, on May 20, directed staff to re are an ordinance P P amendment replacing the Board of Appeals and Adjustments with the City Council, Background In reviewing the State planning law, it appears that i t - i s not necessa for the Council to convene as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments to consider variances. Council can act on them as the City Council. Section 462.354, sub. 2 of State law states that "the governing body may provide alternatively that there' be a separate board of appeals and adjustments or that the governing body or the planning commission or a committee of the planning commission serve as the board of appeals s and ad 'ustments ..." P J The cities of White Bear Lake, Maple Grove, Eagan and Woodbury are examples of cities where variances are handled by their city councils, rather than a board of adjustments and appeals. Eliminating the board would have the following advantages: 1. Less confusion for the audience 2 . Separate minutes would not have to be done 3. Simpler agenda Recommendatio Approval of the enclosed ordinance jw Enclosure Proposed Ordinance I ORDINANCE N0, BOARD OF APPEALS AND AD JUSTMENTS REPLACED HEREBY WI ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: WIT THE P1APLE4JOOD CITY COUNCIL . Section 1. The City - crossed ou y Code i s hereby amende as foll t and additions-underlined): d ows (�ele ns ' B8AR8- - -- A ea -arid-Adjustments 8f APPEALS - ACID- ABadST _ PP is -i _ NEAT ESTABLISHED: -_A_ ' s bepeby- estab} }stied and- detepm - _ Beard -e#' iHing- appeals- fpe� - .fop Abe- pbrpes Pia leweed- - ee4siens ef- adm4nistnat4ve- an�ng p �n Battens- nelat4p - _ eff�E }al - e -ef - and fen - bean }p - _ g to tbe- enfe�Eement -ef -� s of g and elete��jnt n - en�ng _ end }nanEes; } mpesed- by -�en�n -er- g p }ens fen ad 3�st�en - _ g planning- end }nanEes - t of Eend�wt +ens 2@271117-- MEMBERSHIP-OF-APPEAL S B8AR8 - - -Tb s l�all - Eens }st- of -tb B eard - ef- Appeals -and e- Rage- EebnE�l: Mayen _ and- feun -�4 -mem _ hens of - the 202.112. POWERS _AA1B � . APPEALS AND BbT1ES -8 THE BQARD -8 _ VARIANCES. The Bear _ _ F ARREALS- Ap1e_AgdUSTNE shat l hear and de d of Appeals - and -Ad •� aTS: decide all appeals from 3 stments Ci t Council admi nistrat ive or enforcement al 1 e9ed erroneous decisions cement officer of Maplewood eC �S 10 ns of any the admi ni strati on and i n matte • enforcement of the zoning matters relating to the dead Council shal g ordinance 1 a 1 so hear requests is s o f Ma p1 ewood . provisions of the zoni n , n instances for variances from • g ordinance i e the literal merit would cause undue har s where their �st ' dship because of circumstances r�ct enforce- . ro ums to • property under consideration nces un� que to the ind i v i dua 1 and to grant such v ed that such actions keepin it only when i t i s demonstrated will be i n . ance. Such grants shat with the spy r� t and intent of the ordi n 1 not p rovid e . locat r the zoning classifi P de for a use which is not permitted under ted. The Bead Counci i n which the property insure complian may impose conditions i P operty �s p ce and to n granting variances to Protect adjacent properties. g, the Beard -e f_A ea }S _ _ In matters rel to p1 anni n the powers set for p and. Ad3bstments Cat C forth i n Minnesota Sta to ---� ounc 1 shall have 'Statute Section 462.358 S � ubd. 4, 202. 113. PROCEDURES. Appeals may be brought Ad3u t ent 1 . h and Appeals Cit Counci g t before the Bead -ef before the Beard C � l by any affected er ounci 1 may be � n person P son • Appearance Bead Council or agent shall schel due a hearing g nt or attorney. Th appeal i s submitted in w n9 w� the n tbinty s i xt days the V {� } e _ r� ti rig• All notices o f a ys after an g Ele�k Director Of Com ppeal must be filed with scribed by a lic mun�t Develo merit wit th PP able law ordinance within the time pre - gea�d -ef- Appeal - - or regulation. Th rid - Adjus t ments Cat Co a decision of the action shall be required -- — y uncil .shall be final Villa e Council may 1 n accordance q or allowed by the municipality, no further g pal ty except that th alter any decision with the dec�sion, e previously made whi ch m rescind rid or otherwise b ma y have been subject such a y e taken to the District C Ject of the appeal. Further appeal may ap peal is made within tWe Court of Ramsey Count r • the 6 eapd -ef -A _ my days after t _y P oviding ppeals and -Ad justmen he date of th7e decis i is C� t Counci 1 , on of i The Beard -ef -Appeals -apd- • Ad��stments 4LXCounci any appeal within ni net ( its sh render decision on o f the heari y days a fter the date of the end 292 R9LES- AND -RECd - pt-and _ EAT18Pls .. - The -Bea pd -8 f ay -ade P nd preniul gate -rules -and - A ppeals - apd=- Adjustmepts saEh piles- aed -re bra regelat�eps- geverp�p -its., f • b�ef _ g t sh all - be - P�b} }shed- - .. � bpet�ep -apd ewe a�ept�ep -Seeh- wa _ der at east -a 494 - awd �egalat�ep - _ days a f ter .`apPreval - by- the -Villa - s shall hall- efeeti-ve- s }xt - 69 -days _ • �e EeawE�l � - P�°ev�d . - �. eply y f 3 frem- the ed - -t t the Ceewe� ' _ tae- EedpE' b -te -a �e - saEh- riles- apd -re al a�} have • wh�e r _ g at�ews- awe- sbh��tted -te Prev� ded- fbwther -th _ PP eve er _ redeet- apy -er- all -su the Ceewe�l - fail _ _ eb rules -apd we . - shall - take - effect - s to aet w4h�R- said -68 -d __ eaths, - - _ hebt�- B�Re I -a real ays the e , be takep by - w }tpesses _ P� SWeh pules - revld - apd gay alse-- grev�de -fer- � e fer ww�ttep- br�e�s 282:11.5: -- REE8R8S -8�' -SHE- _ shall -kee -a -r _ 68AR8. - -the- Beard -A P eeewd ef- its- tv}t aet es - pPeals� -apd- Adjustments 14m4ed - te; - the - }pates - • apd pweeeed�wgs ; ta ken -- - _ of } ts - �eet�pgs ; - aqd -al• _ • _ 9 � bit eet apd the f�pal erde�s - }w - .. se its f �pd�p.�s;- �qe -aEt�e . A -ef -even - _ • ll hearle s- - +� • y erdew -sake - 9 of appeals -appeal - fer -ad wstm s + t - be shall -fie- _ � eats: del4vertpg same -te- th -VC the Ella e _ llage clerk 9 CedwE�l b Section 2. This ordinan ' after its p assag e Ce shall take effect and be P ge and publication. �n force from and Passed by the. Council of • law the C of ---------- - Ma p wood this day of 1982. Attest: Mayor Ayes - C1 e rk Nays -