Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982 06-14 City Council PacketAGENDA Maplewood City Council 7:00 P.M., Monday,June 14 9 ,.182 Municipal Administration BuiAdin p Meeting 82 13 - (A) CALL TO ORDER (B) ROLL CALL (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes 82-11 (May 6, 1982) (D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA (E) CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion on these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and wi 1 l be considered separately. 1. Accounts Payable 2. Co. Rd. B & Atlantic Stop Signs 3, 1980 Census - Neighborhood Statistics Program 4, Tax Forfeited Lands (F) _ PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. SpecialUse Permit: 47 S. Century (Lutheran Church of Peace) (7:00) 2. Board of Adjustment and Appeals: Variance: r Larpent ur & Jackson (REM Development) (&:00) 3. Preliminary Plat: Gervais Overlook (7:15) 4. Preliminary Plat/PUD Revision: Cave: Century Addition (7:30) (G) __. AWARD OF BIDS 1.1 Award of Bids - Bond Sale (7:30) (H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Code Amendment (.2nd Reading) 2* Kohlman Wetland Acquisition 3, Frost Avenue Improvement 4. Diseased Tree Program 5,9 Uncollectible Paramedic Bills for 1981 6* 1610 Sterling (Bauer) (I) VISITOR PRESENTATION �J)�:NEW BUSINESS 19, Civil Service - Police Chief Selection 24, Battle Creek Assessments Afton Heights Park 3 Special Exception - 2239 Hazelwood Avenue 40 Special Except -ion - 1770 Onacrest Curve-, 59 Roof Sign - ICO Station 6, 9 E Rezoning South of Lower Afton Road 7* Lot Division Appeal - 840 McKnight Road &, HRA Meeting Date and Annual Report (K) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 210 30 4* 5. 60 70 86 90 1010 (M) ADJOURNMENT, in MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD.CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Thursday, May 6, 1982 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 82-11 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnes.ota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7:02 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present MaryLee Maida, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the -agenda as amended: 1. Letters of Appreciation 2. Nuisance Ordinance 3. Sideyard Setback — RE District 4. Pleasantview Park East Lakeshore Drive 6. Ramsey County League 7.. Definition of Family 8. Rules of Procedures 9. Patrolpersons 10. 25th Anniversary Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes — all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Council removed Consent Agenda Item E-1 to become Item J-10, Councilmember Anderson moved, seconded by Councilmember Bastian, Ayes — all, to approve the Consent Agenda Items 2 through 9 as recommended. 1. Accounts Payable See Item J-10, 2. No Parking: East Shore Drive Resolution No. 82-5-50 — 1 — 5/6 WHEREAS, the imposition of parking restrictions on East of Frost- Avenue connection is in Shore Drive west the best interest of the health, welfare and safety of the citizens of Maplewood; - � NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY . COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows. that this Council request that RamseyC Drive I west of Frost Avenue conn "No Parking" � County designate East .Shore connection a ' zone . 3. Manuel of Engineering Guidelines Adopted the "Manuel of Engineering Guidelines, 4. Final Plat: Linwood Avenue Approved the final plat for Linwood Heights g s Addition for 74 unit townhouse development (21 buildings) subject to the condition that the applicant shall provide an easement for public purposes for the Hillwood Drive cul-de-sac. 5. Final Plat: Bollman's Addition Approved the final plat for Arthur Bollman's Addition sub' cash connection charges for lots 1 and 2 subject to the payment of sewer before the plat is signed. 6. Final Plat: Maple Ridge Mall Approved the final plat for Maple Ridge Mall subject to • the dedication of Outlot A to � the submission of a deed for Ramsey County prior to signing the plat. 7. Contribution: Moose Lodge Accepted a contribution of $250..00 from the St. Paul Lodge No. 9639 Loyal Order of Moose to be used for planting flowers in thearks and warded. P that a letter of thanks be for - 8. Commercial Development Revenue Note: Maplewood Dental Specialists sts Building Resolution No. 82-5-51 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Cit of • City Maplewood, Minnesota as follows: ARTICLE ONE DEFINITIONS, LEGAL AUTHORIZATION AND FINDINGS 1-1 . Def init ions : The terms used herein, unless the context hereof shall require otherwise shall have the following meanings, and any other terms defined in the Loan Agreement shall have the same meanings when used herein as assigned g to them in the Loan Agreement un- less the context or use thereof indicates another or' different meaning or intent. Act: the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Ac p t, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, as amended, Bond Briggs Counsel: the firm of Brie s and M ------ organ, Professional Association, of St. Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota and• any opinion of Bond Counsel shall be a written opinion signed by such Counsel; — 2 — 5/6 a. Borrower: Maplewood Dental • general partnership, Specialties, a Minnesota • g , p tnership, its successors ass' .surviving, resulting or assigns, and any • , g transferee business entity which ma assume its obligations under the Lo Y Loan Agreement; ity: the City of Maplewood* ' and i'ssigns; P Minnesota, its successors Construction Loan Agreement: the agreement to be executed by the City, the Borrower and the Lender, relating to the disbursement and payment of Project' .Costs for the acquisition of the Land and the construction and installation Improvements; on of the Equi meet: an and all • �._.�..t, Y machinery, equipment, ent u ..and other tangible personal q P� furniture p onal property purchased or to be purchaed by the Borrower with thero with P ceeds of the Note, .including* out limitation, those items of machin dent, furniture and other personal machinery, equip �' l property more particul arl listed and described on Exhibit B toy this Agreement; Guarantors: collectively,DennisBe Dr• DenniMcMahon, Dr. Walter Parsons, Dr. Robert L. Jensen and Dr. Jane . • • H _Jensen, � Guaranty, the Guaranty of Specific Indebtedness t executed by or on behalf of o be • the Guarantors as of the date of this Agreement; Improvements: the structures and other n improvements, including any Equipment, to be constructed or installed b Borrower on the Land in accordance with the Plans and Y the Specifications; Land: the real property and an other rights Y easem ents and ri g d in Exhibit A attached to the Loan Agreement; Leases: all leases now or hereafter affecting the Land; Lender: First State Bank of saint Paul Ste Paul, Minnesota, its Successors and assigns; Loan Agreement: the agreement to be executed by the City and the Borrower, providing for the issuance of the Note and the loan of the proceeds thereof to the Borr, amendments or supplementsmer. including any thereto made in accordance with i t s provisions* Mortgage: the Statutory Mortgage, Ass i nment of and Rents, SecurityAgreement g Leases g eement and Fixture Financing Statement to be executed by the Borrower, as mortgagor, securing to the Lender, as mortgagee, i.ng payment of the Note and interest thereon • Note: the $800g000 Commercial . Development Revenue of1982 Dental Specialties Project), to be issued b the City pursuant to this Resolution and Y the Loan Agreement; Note Register: the records, - kept t b the C provide forte � P Y City Clerk to h registration of transfer of ownershi of the Note; P - 3 - 516 Plans and S ecif icatf ons : the plans and specifications for the construction and Unstallationofthe Improvements on the Land, which are approved by the Lendero together modifications thereof and with. such additions thereto as are reasonably Y by the Borrower to be necessary or desirable completion of the Itn � dile for the provements and are approved by the Lender; Pledge A reement: thea agreement to be g executed by the City and the Lender pledging and Agreement assigning. the Loan A to the Lender; g t P rinci al Balance: so much of therine ' pal sum on the Note a P i s from time to tune may have been advanced to or fo benefit of the Cit and rem r the y . a ins unpaid at any time; Project: the Land and Improvements as timeexist; p they may at any Project Costs: the total of all "Construction Costs" s and "Loan and Carrying Charges, as those terms aredefined in the ' Loan Agreement; Resolution: this Resolution of the Cit adopted Y P , together with any supplement or amendment thereto . 1982 All references in this instrument to designated "Articles," "Sections" and other subdivisions ivs, s i ons are to the .designated Articles, Sections and subdivisions of this instrument as originally executed. The words "herein," rein, "hereof" and "hereunder" and other words of similar ' s z.mi 1 ar unpart refer to this Resolution as a whole not to-anyparticular Sect' P ulcer Article, ion or subdivision. 1-2. Le al Authorization. The City is a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota and is authorized under the Act to initiate the revenue producing project herein referred to, and to issue and sell the Note for the purpose, in the manner and upon p the terms and conditions set forth in the Act and in this Resolution. 1-39 Findings. The City Council has heretofore determinedo and does hereby determine, as follows: (1) The City is authorised by the Act to enter into a .Loan Agreement for the public purposes expressed in the Act; (2) The City has made the necessa arra ' Borrower for the z'Y arrangements with the establishment within the City of a Project cons i sting of certain property all as more fully described in the Loan Agreement and which will be of the character and _ 4 - 5/6 accomplish the purposes provided by the Act., and the Cit this Resolution y has by authorized the Project and execution of the Loan Agreement, the Pledge Agreement, the Note and the Construction Loan Agreement, which documents specify the teryas and conditions of the acquisition and financingof the Project;' oject; (3) in authorizing the Project the City's purpose z s • andin its judgment the effect thereof will be, to promote the public welfare by: the attraction, encouragement developmentand of economically sound industry and commerce so as to prevent, so far as possible, the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and are g g as of chronic unemployment the develop- ment of revenue--producingenterprises P to use the available resources of the co=nunity, in order to retain the benefit of the community's existing investment in educational andublic service facilities; the haltingP of the movement of talented, educated personnel of all ages to other areas thus preserving the economic and hum n P 9 a resources needed as a base for providing governmental services and facilities; the provision of - sible employment P acces p oyment opportunities for residents in the area; the expansion of an adequate tax base to finance the cost of governmental services, including educational services for the school district serving the community in which the Project is situated; (4) the amount estimated to be necessary to partially � finance the Project Costs, including the costs and estimated costs permitted by Section 474.05 of the Act, will require the issuance of the Note in q the principal amount of $800,000 as hereinafter provided; C5) it is desirable feasible • • , and consistent with the objects and purposes of the Act to issue the Note, for the purpose of partially financing the Project; (6) the Note and the interest accruing c ing thereon do not constitute an indebtedness of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation and do not constitute or give rise to a pecuniaryliability or a against the Y charge g , general credit or taxing powers of the City and neither the full faith and credit nor the taxingpowers of po the City is pledged for the payment of the Note or interest thereon; and (7) The Note is an industrial development bond within the meaning of Section 103 ( b) of the Internal Revenue Code and is to be issued within the exemption provided under subparagraph CAS of Section 103 b 6 C ) t i of the Code with respect to an issue Of $1,000*000 or less; provided that nothingherein shall prevent the p City from hereafter qualifying the Note under a different exemption if, and to the extent, such exam tion • permitted law and consistent P is �?Y nt with the objects and purposes of the Project. _ 5 - 5/6 Authorization and Ratification of Project. The City has heretofore and does hereby authorize the Borrower, in accordance with the provisions of Section 474.03 ( 7) of the Act and subject to the ter=ns and conditions set forth in the Construction Loan Agreement, top rovide for the construction and installation of the Project pursuant to the Plans and Specifications by such means as shall be available to the Borrower and in the manner determined by the Borrower, and without advertisement for bids as may be required for the construction and acquisition of municipal facilities; and the City hereby ratifies, affirms, and approves all actions heretofore .taken by the Borrower consistent with and in anticipation of such authority and in compliance with the Plans and Speci f ications . ARTICLE TWO NOTE 2--1 • Authorized Amount and Form of Not - e. The Note issued pursuant to this Resolution the f shall be in substantially form set forth herein, with such appropriate variations, omissions and insertions as permitted or required b this Resolution, are with ?' ut�on, and in accordance the further provisions hereof; and the total' amount of the Note that may principal y be outstanding hereunder is expressly limited to $800,000 unless a duplicate N .pursuant to Section 2-7 P Note is issued The Note shall be in substantially the following form: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Commercial Development Revenue Note of 1982 11 (Maplewood Dental Specialties Project) sect) $8001000 FOR VALUE RECEIVED the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD County, Minnesota(the Ramsey "City") hereby promises to a order of First State Bank of pay to the "Lender"), Saint Paul, Zn St• Paul, Minnesota (the its successorsr ' o registered assigns, from the source and in the mariner hereinafter provided* e • sum of EIGHT HUNDREDP � th principal ipa 1 THOUSAND DOLLARS AND 00/100 DOLLARS (S'P000,000-00), or so much thereof as may have been advanced to or for the benefit of the Cit and Terrain ' ' time(the "pBalance"),y s unpaid frombrae to "Principal with in rate of thine interest thereon at the en and twenty-five hundredths percent3 1.25% ` per annum or C � at such other rate as hereinafterP rovided in - 6 - 5/6 paragraphs 1 (c) and 1 (d) hereof, in an coin or Curr ' at the time or times y currency which • of payment is legal tender for the payment of public or private debts in the United States of America, in accordance with the terms hereinafter set forth. 1 • (a) From and after the date hreof and "Amortization► Date" (the until the first day of the calendar month next succeding completion of the Project in accordance with the Construction Loan Agreement hereinafter referred event no later than to, but in any Lender), interest on a unless extended by Y the shall accrue from and after the date of each and eve advance anee so made under this Note and shall be payable on the first da month next y of the calendar succeeding the date upon which the first advance i wade, and on the first da of each s Y and every month thereafter, (b) Front and after the Amortization Date Principal Balance the P shall be paid in 240 equal consecutive monthly installments payable on the first da of a commencing on the Y each month g first day of the calendar month next succeeding the Amortization Date and continuing ng until thePrinci al Balance(theshall have been paid "Final Maturity Date ) . Y • (c) From and after the Amortization Date interest accruing on the Principal Balance for an month shall be able y calendar pay on the first day of each month Coz=encing on the first day of the calendar month next su ing the Amortization Date and contcceed- inuing until the accrued interest on the Principal Balance shall have• been paid. Unless a "Determination of Taxability" shall occur, In which event the interest rate shall be governed by paragraph l(d) hereof, the rate of interest shall be adjusted every three years on January .10 until the Final Maturity Date, beginningJanua .On each such • � 10' 1986. January 10 , the rate of interest shall be adjusted to a rate equal to s event •- f ive(.75%)• y hundredths percent s n excess of the average of the rates published for thereced ' 182 da U P ing four weeks as the y United States Treasury Bill yield as such rate is published each Tuesday in the Wall Street Journal Cor in the event such rates are notubli • p shed or are otherwise not available, a similiar successor rate chosen b and approved Y the Borrower PP �n writing by the Lender, provided that if no such successor rate can be agreed upon, Lender shall have the option Of calling this Note), P n (d) I f the interest on this Note should subject to federal become income taxation pursuant to a "Determination of Taxability" as that term is defined in Section 0 4,a07 of the Loan Agreement of even date herewith between the City and Maplewood Dental Specialties (the "Borrower"(the ",,) Loan Agreement")* and the Lender delivers to the Borrower a copy of the notice of the "Determination of Taxability", the interest rate shall be immediately adjusted to six ercent (6%) per annum P in excess of the average of the rates published preceding four P for the P , g weeks as the 1 g2 day United States Treasury Bill yield as such rate is published � P each Tuesday in the Wall Street Journal Cor in the event such rates are notublished otherwise not available, P or are 1 , a similiar successor rate chosen b the Borrower and approved in y PP writing by the Lender, provided that if no such successor rate can be agreed upon Lender shall the option of calling this Note) which rate shall be - 7 - 5/6 adjusted on each succeeding Janus 10 and each �' monthly installment thereafter payable shall be adjusted accordingly. In addition the Lender shall be entitled to receive upon demand an amount equal to the aggregate difference between(i)=aonthl the a y payments theretofor wade between the Date of Taxability", to the Lender on this Note the Loan Agreement, and the date as that termis defined in of receipt P by the Borrower o f notice of "Determination such of , Taxability" , and (ii)th�aonthl e a y payments which would have if the adjusted been made duringsuch period rate had been n in effect throughout Such period. 2. In any event, the payments hereunder shall be sufficient to Pay all principal and interest due, as such principal and interest becomes due, and toa r topay any premium or service charge, at maturity, upon redemption, or Otherwicsn Computed on the b s e . Interest shall be e P basis of a 3 60 day year, but charged for the actual number of days els sed iYear. P n a 365 day 3e If the Lender ' should not receive on the first of any month all of the principal day incipal and interest then due on the Note, and if the City should continue to be in arrears through the fifteenth day of such month, then, in addition to all other suras due hereunder, the Lender shall be entitled to receive e on the sixteenth day of such month a service rice charge equal to four percent (4.00%) of the delinquentrinci al and interest. P P rest. 4. Principal and interest and premium . or service charge due hereunder shall be payable at the principal of the Le Y P ipal office nder, or at such other place as the Lender may designate in writing. Y 5. This Note is issued by the Cit to provide ro ' e ct as d y P funds fora P defined in Section 474.02, Subdivision la, Minnesota Statutes, consistingof the acquisition of real estate, and the construction of a 12,000 square foot office/dental facility q ity thereon, pursuant to a Loan Agreement of even date herewith between the City and Maplewood Dental Specialties(the �� P"Borrower") (the "Lown Agreement"), and ' Note i g � • this s further issued pursuant to and in full compliance w' the Constitution and laws P with of the State of Minnesota, particularly Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes and resolution of the Cit � pursuant to a City Council duly adopted on (the "Resolution$') . 6. This Note is secured by a Pledge Agreement -of even date herewith g by the City to the Lender (the "P1edge Agreement"),, a Statutory Mortgage, Assignment of Rents Security9 Leases and Agreement and Fixture Financing Statement, of even date herewith betweenthe Borrower, as mortgagor,and the Lender as mortgagee (the �� Mortgage�� ) Assignments of 9 Life Insurance Policies ies issuing the lives of Dr . Dennis McMahon Dr. Walter Be Parsons, Jr. and Dr. Robert L. Jensen. Payment this Note is uncond ' y ent of it�onally and jointly and severally quaranteed by Dr. Dennis McMahon, Dr. Walter Be Parsons Jane H. Jensen and Dr . Dr. . • Robert L. Jensen pursuant to the terms of a certain Guaranty of Specific Indebtedness in favor of the Lender (the Guaranty) and the disbursement of the _ proceeds of _ _ 5/6 this Note is subject to the terms an conditions d conditions of a Construction Loan Agreement of even d Lender, the Cit ate herewith, between the City and the Borrower (the Construction Lo Agreement"), an 79 The Lender may extend the ' interest and/or r times of Payments of / principal of or an • due on this y service charge or premum Note, including the Final Maturity Date* without notice to or consent of any art liable - releasin party hereon and without g any such party. However, in no event may the Final Maturity Date be extended(30) y beyond thirty years from the date hereof. 8• This Note may be prepaid • an time without �' P P �n whole or in part at y �thout premium.. 9. This Note is further subject to re a City, at an time � P P yraent by the y , without a premium, in whole or in art, upon the occurrence of certain. eve •P P events of damage, destruction or condemnation of the property secured b the Mo sped f led in Section Y rtgage, a s on 2 of the Mortgage. In addition, the Lender shall have the option to declare the Principal pal Balance and accrued interestrinci due and payable on the first day of the tenth (10th) Loan Year and the f r e 1st day of the fifteenth (15th) Loan Year upon • . C � days prior written notice to the City and the B or rower . The term "Loan" Year as used herein shall mean a twelve (12) month period commencingon anniversary thereof. the Amortization Date and on each .. 10. In the event of prepayment of this N Lender shall a � Note, the apply any such prepayment against the accrued interest on the Principal Balance and then against al amounts d 9 nit the final principal due under the Noteo, The monthly payments due under paragraph 1 hereof, � , shall continue to be due and payable in full until the entire Principal Balance and P n accrued interest due on this Note have been paid regardless of an partial prepayment made hereunder. Y ll' . As provided in the Resolution' and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Note is transferable upon the books of the Cit at the Cit Clerk City,at office of the City by the Lender in person or by his agent duly y authorized in writings at .the Lender's expense, upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of satisfactoryto the transfer City Clerk, duly executed by the Lender or his duly authorized agent. Upon such transfer the City Clerk will note the date of registration and the name and addressd of the new registered Lender er in the registration blank appearing bel • PP 9 ow • The City may deem and treat the person in whose name the Note is last registered upon the books of the City i y with such registration, noted on the Note, as the absolute owner hereof overdue, for the whether or not purpose of receiving payment of or on the account, of the Principal Balance, or redemption rice P p interest — 9 — 5/b 2-2. The Initial Note, The Note shall be dated as f ` o the date of delivery, shall be payable at the times and in the .the rate, manner, shall bear interest at t , and shall be subject to such other terms and conditions as are set forth therein. 2-3. Execution. The Note shall be executed on behalf of the' ty by the signatures of its C1 Mayor and City Clerk and shall be sealed with the seal of the City. In case an officer shall appear on the Y whose signature PP Note shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Note, such signature shall valid and su � g 11 nevertheless be . purposes, the same as if remained • ffici.�n office until ent for all had delivery. In the event of the absence or disability of the Mayor or the Cit Clerk ' the Cit as in • y such off* of Y , the opinion of the Ci, ty Attorne , may act their behalf, shall without fu Y Y • In further act or authorization of the City Council execute and deliver the Note, Zm . Delive of Initial Note.. Before delivery of the Note there shall be filed the Lender (except to led with the extent waived by the Lender) the f of lowing items: (1) an executed copy of each of the following documents: (A) the Loan Agreement; (B) the Pledge Agreement; (C) the Mortgage; (D) the Construction Loan Agreement; (E) the Guaranty; (*F) the Assignments of Life Insurance' Policies; (G) a Cost Certificate signed b the certifying the use Y Borrower Y g of the proceeds of the Note; (H) Leases now existing. (2) an opinion of Counsel for the Borrower as prescribed by Bond Counsel; (3). the opinion of Bond Counsel as to the validity and tax exempt status of the Note; (4) a title coQnmitment in form and substance satisfactory to the Lender; iso such other documents and opinions as Bond Counsel may reasonably require for purposes of rendering its opinion required in subsection (3) above or that the Lender may reasonably require for the closing. 12 - 5/6 2-5 . Die osition of Note -Proceeds, There is hereby established with the Construction Fund to be Lender a held by the Lender as a Separate account of the City as provided inthe Construction n Loan Agreement* Upon del ive of the ry Note to Lender, the proceeds Of Such Note shall be credited to the Construction Fund held by the Lender on behalf of the City, at which time the entire principal amount of the Note shall be deemed advanced, and the Lender shall, on behalf of the City, disburse y funds from the Construction Fund for payment of Project Costs upon r • such supporting docun�enta t i on as the Lender mP receipt 1pt o f may, deem reasonably Y necessary, including compliance with the Construction Loan Agreement* provisions of the g ent . The 8orrowe r shall provide the City with a full accountingof all f .Costs* ands disbursed for Project 2-6* Registration of Transfer. The City will cause to be kept at the . -City Clerk a Note Register in which, P office of the subject to such reasonable regulations as it may prescribe, the Cit registration of r Y shall provide far the transfers of ownership of the Note. The .shall be transferable Upon the Note P Note Register by the Lender in person or its agent dul authorized• surrender o the Note to a her with sn wrlong, upon g th a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Cit Clerk, k, duly executed by the Lender or its duly authorized agent. s Upon P •uch transfer the City Clerk shall note the date of registration and the name address of the new Lender in the and Note Register and in the registration blank appearing on PP g the Note, 2a-79 Mutilated, Lost or Destroe Y d Note. In case any Note issued hereunder shall mutilated or be deet become destroyed or lost, the City shall, if not then n by law, cause to be executed and delivered, Note of like outstanding anew ng principal amount, number and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon • p cancellation of such mutilated Note, or in lieu ' of and insubstituti• on for such Note destroyed or lost, upon the Lender's paying the reasonable expenses and charges of the City in connection therewithe and in the case of a Note destroyed or to Cit of evidence y st • the filing with the y ev i ence satisfactory to the City that such Note destroyed or lost, and furnishingthe was satisfactory,city with indemnity to it. If the mutilated, destroyed or lost y Note has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it shall not be necessary _prior to a Bret. to issue a new Note P ym 2-8. 4wnersh3:-of Note. The City may deem and treat the person in whose name the Note is last re P registered in the Note Register and b notation on the Note whether or not y as the such Note shall be overdue, absolute owner of such Note for thePOSe ur of receivi• payment of or on accountP ng of the Principal Balance, redemption 13 - 5/6 price or interest and for all the C other purposes whatsoever, and City shall not be affected• by any notice to the contrary. 2-9 • Limitation on Note Transfers . The Note has been issued without• state or other securities laws, pursuant to registration under an exemption for. such issuance; and accordingly the g y .Note may not be assigned or transferred in whole or part, nor may -aparticipation ' in the Note be given pursuant interest except P• ant to any .participation .agreement •p in accordance with an applicable exemption registration requirements.A from such 2--10• Issuance of New Notes. Subject to the provisions of Section• u 2-9, the City shall, at the request est and expense of the Lender issue new notes, in aggregate outstandin ' Outstanding Principal amount equal to that of the Note surrend eyed, and of like tenor except as to principal amount, and the am A number, cunt of the monthly installments payable thereunder, and registered in such transferee as may be dethe name of the Lender or designated by the Lender. ARTI CLE THREE GENERAL COVENANTS 3-1. Payment of Princi al and --Interest, The City covenants that it willr principal F °raptly FeY or cause to be paid the p pal of and interest on the Note at the place, on the dates, solely from the source. and in the manner provided herein and in the Note. Therin • able solei F C1Pa2 and interest are payable y from and secured by revenues androc ree F eeds derived from the Loan A J n�ent, the Pledge Agreement, the Mortgage, the Construction Loan Agreement and the Guaranty, which revenues and proceeds are hereby specifically pledged to the payment thereof in the manner and to the extent' in the Note , the Loan A teem specs f ied Agreements the Pledge Agreement, the Mortgages the Construction Loan Agreement and the Guaranty; - and nothing in the Note or in this Resolution shall be considered as assigning, pledging or otherwise encumbering or assets of the City.ering any other funds 3-2* performance of and Authorityfor Covenants, The City covenants that it will faithful all times an and all , faithfully perform at Y covenants, undertakings, stipulations and provisions contained in this Res 1 ' A o ution, in the Note executed, authenticated and delivered hereunder• and in all proceedings of the City Council pertaining thereto; that it is dauthorized under the Constitution my and laws of the State of Minnesota including particularly and without the Note limitation the Act, to issue authorized hereby, pledge the revenues a ' �a and assign the Loan Agreement in the manner and to the extent set forth in this Resolution, the Note, the Loan Agreement and the Pledge 14 - 5/6 Agreement; that all action on its part for the issuance of Note and for the execution and the delivery thereof has been duly and effectively taken; and that the Note in the hands of the Lender is and will be a valid and enforceable special limited P united obligation of the City according to the terms thereof. 3-3. Enforcement and Performance of Covenants . The City agrees to enforce all covenants and obligations of the Borrower under the Loan Agreement and Construction Loan Agreement, and toerform all covenants P o enants and other provisions pertaining to the Cit contained in the Loan Agreement y the ,Note, and the Construction Loan Agreement and subject to Section 3-4 . 3-4. Nature of Securitv. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Note Mortgage, the Loan A reement � the g the Pledge edge Agreement or any other document referred to in Section 2 -4 to the contr arY• under the provisions of the Act the Note may not be payable from or be a charge upon any funds of the City other than thev re enues and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall ' sub ect to an 1 ' the City be y give thereon, nor shall the Note otherwise contribute or give rise to a pecuniary liability of �' Y the City or, to the extent permitted by law, any of the City's officers employees and a ents . No g holder of the Note shall ever have the right to coQnpel any exercise of the taxingw power of the City to pay the Note or the interest thereon or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the Cit other than revenues pledged under the y the 9 Pledge Agreement; and the Note shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon an g P y property of the City; and the Note shall not constitute a debt of the Cit within the Y meaning of any constitutional or statutory li.raitation; but nothing impairs the rights in the Act P • g of the Lender to enforce the covenants made for the security thereof as provided in this Resolution, the Loan Agreement, the Pledge Agreement, the Mort a e Assignments. of 9 g the Life Insurance Policies, the Construction Loan Agreement, the Guaranty and in the Act, and by authority of the Act the City has made the covenants and agreements herein for the benefit of the Lender; provided that in any event, the agreement of the City to perform or enforce the covenants and other provisions contained in the Note, the Loan A Pledge Agreement the Assignments Agreement, the of Life Insurance Policies, and the Construction Loan Agreement shall be subject at all times to the availability of revenues under the Loan Agreement, the Mortgage, the Construction Loan Agreement, the Guaranty, and the Assignments of Life Insurance Policies sufficient ficient to pay all costs of such performance or the enforcement thereof .and the Cit shall , City not be subject to any personal or pecuniary liability thereon. 15 _ 5/6 ARTI CLE FOUR M I S CELLANEOU S 4"l • Severabili ONWO-Wtv. If any provision • deemed to be or of this Resolution shall, in fact, be shall be held or as applied in an part , inoperative or Y P titular ease inJurisdiction unenforceable JUrisdictions or an it in allJurisdictions Yor conflicts with an or in all case or rule or Y, provisions of an s because circumstances policy, or f Y constitution or stat rcumstances shall no °r any other reason, statute t have the effect • such provision in � of ren • question inoperative rendering the case or circustanCe or unenforceable ' provisions her • , or of rendering an ? any other herein contained lav Y other provision or unenforceable to an invalid, • inoperative y extent whatever. or one or more phrases The invalidity Resolution Sentences, clauses ty of any contained shall nota °r Paragraphs in this this Resolution or affect ect the remaining • any part thereof, ing portions of 4'2 • AUthentication__Of Transcript. The Officers oft • Bond Counsel ter • he City are directed tified copies of to furnish to documents referredthis Resolution to a to herein, and and all 11 other matters affidavits or certificates the valid • which are reasonab as validity of the Note. ly necessa to ev • certificate All such Certl � ideate s and affidavits fled copies, furnished, shall including an constitute recit Y heretofore correctness of all st als of the Cit as statements contained Y to the therein, 4'3 • Registration n of Resolution. The City Clerk • copy of this Cit is authorized and dire Ramsey Count. ution to be .filed directed to cause a y • and to n obtain 'from with the Count Au d i certificate thatsaid County Audi or for of the Note as a bond a entered upon his bond of the Cit has register. y been duly 4-4• Authorization to Execute Agreements, The forms of the Agreement, the Co Proposed Loan Agreements, Construction Loan Agreements the Pledge the .Mortgage are 9 cement. the beret hereby approved Guaranty and heretofore presented to in substantiall the additional the City Council y form details therein a together with such and such s may be necessary h modification there . t`Y' and appropriate additions thereto of, deletions they approve as may be necessary therefrom and d by Bond Counsel rY and appropriate documents prior to the exec end , and the Mayor and Ci u t i on Of the authorized to execute City Clerk of the • and the cute the Loan Agreements a City are Construction Loan eat, the Pledge behalf of the Agreement in the Agreement City and such other name of and on consider appropriate documents as B Note, P in Connection withand Counsel In the event of the the issuance or the Cit absence or disa of the • y Clerk such officers b111tY of the Of the Cit of the Cit Mayor City Attorney, may act �' as • i n the Opinion in their behal pinion f , shall without 16 - 5/6 further act or authorization of the City Council do all things and execute all instru— ments and documents required to be done or executed by such absent or disabled officers. The execution of any instrument by the appropriate • .officer or officers of the City herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents in accordance with the terms hereof. Adopted: May 6, 1982. /s/ John C. Greavu- Mayor of City of Maplewood Attest: /s/ Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk 9. Traffic Signals and : 0 ticomsFunding ing Authorized a budget transfer of up to $57,000 from the State Aid Street Fund to install signal and opticom systems at the following locations: TH 94 South Ramp, Burns Avenue at McKnight Signal "Opticom" Road — $12,000 TH94 North Ramp at McKnight Road $12,000 TH 61 at Beam Avenue $4,500 $12,000 TH 36 at E,hgl ish $4,500 $12,000 $9,000 $48,000 TOTAL $57.9000 Mayor Greavu recessed the meeting at 7:I0 P.M, to convene as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Mayor Greavu reconvened the meeting at 7:31 P.M* F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. Highway 61 Frontage Road 7:15 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting fora public hearing improvement of Highway61 Frontage P aring regarding the proposed ge Road by construction of street, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, watermains and appurtenances. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in order and noted the dates of publication. b. Assistant City Engineer Pillatzkeresente P d the specifics of the proposal. C* Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Fischer moved the PlanningCommission make the following findings: 1. That the construction of the proposed frontage P g road, east of Highway 61, from Gervais Avenue to County Road C, is consistent with the Land Use Plan, 2. At such time that this project is . P J awarded, Council should initiate the vacation -- 17 — 5/6 of Connor Avenue and Duluth Street, lying north of thero o p p sed frontage road. Commissioner Whitcomb seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Barrett, ett, Fischer, Howard, Pellish, Prew, Sletten, Whitcomb." d. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard f • proposal. The following persons expressed r ressed thei views,or or against the Mr. James Fenlon, 1216 E. County Road C A representative of Lakeview Lutheran Church Mr, John Mattson, 1230 E. County Road C e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. f. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 82 - 5 - 52 WHEREAS, after due notice of public i hearing on the construction of street, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, watermain and appurtenances on T.H. 61 Frontage rontageRoad Maplewood Drive) from Gervais Avenue to Count Road Y „C , a hearing on said im- provement in accordance with the notice duly given was held on May 6 the Council has heard all persons desiri Y 1982, and P ng to be heard on the matter and has fully ' considered the same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLE WOOD,. MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That it is advisable, expedient, and necessarythat • t the City of Maplewood construct street, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, watermain and appurtenances on T.H. 61 Frontage Road (Maplewood Drive from Ge PP ances r Gervais Avenue to County Road ^� "C" as described in the notice of hearing thereon and orders be made, ers the same to 2. The City Engineer is designated engineer gineer for this improvement and is hereby directed to prepare f inal plans and specifications for improvement. the making of said Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. N 4. Plan Amendment and Special Use Permit: Lar enteur p Avenue and Jackson Street (REM Development, Inc.) 7:45 P.M, a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing of REM Development, .Inc, for a special g regarding the request p ial use permit to construct a 36 bed housing complex for mentally disabled persons at the northwest corn e t corner of Larpenteur Avenue and Jackson Street. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in order and noted the dates of publication. b. Manager Evans presented",the staff report, c. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Whitcomb moved the Planning Commission recommend amendment from RL, Low Density Re approval of a Plan Residential to Rh, High Density .Residential, on the basis that: - 18 - 5/6 1. The density in the neighborhood would not exceed the maximum density for the neighborhood at the RL designation. 2. Amending the plan for the proposed use would meet the -goal of the Land d Use Plan by providing increased types of health care for the community, Y 3. The zoning classification of the site is appropriate for the Rh land use se de— signation. Commissioner Sletten seconded. Ayes — Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Ellefson Fischer, Hejny, Howard, Kishel, Pellish, Sletten, Whitcomb, Commissioner Whitcomb moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the special use permit for the Greenwood North residence for handicapped adults, on the basis that: 1. The zoning of the site is appropriate. 2. The proposed complex would meet with the goals of the Land Use Plan Update by providing a health care facility not presently available in Maplewood. Approval is subject to: 1. Approval of a Plan change for the site from RL to Rh. 2. After the first year of operation, the Council may renew or revise the Y special use permit. 3. Beaumont Street shall be vacated prior to the issuance of a building permit, 4. The applicant shall provide substantial screening of the property along the northerly and westerly lot lines as a buffer. This will be subject to the approval of the Community Design Review Board, Commissioner Fischer seconded. Chairman Axdahl moved an amendment to include a condition #5, Staff's confirmation that a three acre/foot pond is adequate at reasonable depth, Commissioner Pellish seconded. Ayes — Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett Ellefs-on, Fischer, Hejny, Howard, Kishel, Pellish, Sletten, Whitcomb. Voting on the motion as amended: Ayes — Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Ellefson, Fischer, Hejny, Howard, Kishel, Pellish, Sletten, Whitcomb. d. Mr. Tom Miller, representing REM Development, spoke on behalf of the proposal. Mr. Bob Rusub, Ackerman Architecture, presented the plans for the proposal. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard: Mr. Joseph Morris, 1716 Beaumont, presented a petition signed by the area residents opposing the proposal. Mr. John Hines, 33 Larpenteur Avenue Mr. Willard Wills, 66 E. Larpenteur Avenue Mr. Donald Rongetsch, 1709 Jackson — 19 — 5/6 Mr. Larry O'Flanagan, , 1719 Beaumont Mrs. Marty Showers, 1719 Abel Mr. George Harwell, 1726 Abel Mr. Rocky Olson, 1695 Abel Mr. Michael Shannon, 1714.Jackson Mr. John Slama, 77 E. Kingston Mr. John Steiner, 1730 Jackson. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved• its adoption: 82-5-53 WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council and the Maplewood PlanningCommission have prepared and adopted a Comprehensive Community on Plan in compliance with the requirements of Section 462.355 of the State Planning EnablingLe islation.• Legislation.; and WHEREAS, said Section 462.355 provides for subsequent amendment of said Com- prehensive Plan which reflect changed conditions; and WHEREAS, the Maplewood Planning Commission has conducted the public required hearing and has given consideration to all q P lic evidence and testimony submitted at such hearing held on May 3, 1982 and has adopted said amendment and forwarded said amendment to the City Council for certification; and WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council has reviewed said amendment; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maplewood Cit Council hereby ereby adopts and amends the Comprehensive Plan for Maplewood. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - Mayor Greavu Council member s Anderson and Maida. Nays - Councilmembers Bastian and Juker. i. Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the Special Use Permit as requested by. REM Development, Inc. to construct a 36 bed housing complex for mentally tally disabled persons at the northwest corner of Lar enteur Avenue and Jackson Street subject to the following conditions: I. Approval of a Plan change for the site from RL to Rh. 2. After the first year of.operation, the Council may renew or revise the special use permit. 3. Beaumont Street shall be vacated prior to the issuance of a building ng permit. 40 The applicant shall providesubstantial screening ng of the property along the northerly and westerly lot lines as a buffer. g This will be subject to th approval of the Community Design Review Board. J e Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Councilmember Bastian moved to amend the motion and include the followingcondit- ions o n dat- ions to the Special Use Permit. - 20 - 5/6 5. Approval of Fire Marshal for life safety access. 6. Buffer to be placed on Larpenteur Avenue side tor v p e ent headlong traffic onto subject property. 7. Fencing be provided on the North and West areas of property to prevent access to pond. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes—Mayor Greavu, Y y u, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Maida. Nays—Councilmember Juker. Voting on original motion. Ayes Mayor Greavu, Councilmember lmember Anderson and Maida. Nays — Councilmembers Bastian and Juker. Mayor Greavu recessed the meeting at 9:49 P.M. to reconvene as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, � Mayor Greavu reconvened the meeting at 10:11 P.M. G. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Towing Contract a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Mr. Don Regan., representing Art's Towin , stated there was ' the bids, g s descrepancies in C* Following further discussion, Councilmember Anderson moved, due to questions that arose, to reject all bids and refer the_proposed towing contract to stiff. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes — all. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None, I. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None. J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Special Exception: 931 County Road C — Howard a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Whitcomb moved the Planning Commission recommend' to the City' y Council approval of a special exception for a home occupation permit to operate an insurance office, subject to the following conditions: p ante 1. Compliance with all of the criteria as outlined inh t e Planning Commission subcommittee report. - 21 _ 5/6 2. The special exception may be renewed after three that there has not been an • years if Council is satisfied y nuisances created by the business. 3. The applicant shall install one five -pound f' • within the dwelling. The P ire extinguisher and smoke detectors g placement of these shall be determined b the Fir Marshal. Y e. Commissioner Sletten seconded* Ayes - Commissioners Barrett, Fischer, Pellish, Prew, Sletten, Whitcomb." c. Mr. Bill Howard, the applicant, spoke on behalf of the proposal. d. Councilmember Anderson moved to a rove the request of Mr. Bill Howard, 931 E. County Road C, for a special use ermit to o erate his home subject to the followingcondi an insurance agency from tions: 1. Compliance with all of the criteria as outlined in the Planning Commission subcommittee report. 2. The special exception may renewed d after three years if Council is satis- fied that there has not been any nuisances created b • y the business. 3. The applicant shall install one five -pound • p fire extinguisher and smoke detectors within the dwelling. The placement of these shall be d Marshal. etermined by the Fire Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all, 1. 2. Special Exception: Game RoomMa l ( p ewood Square) Applicant withdrew the request. 3. English Street: D. Tucci a. Mr. David Tucci, representing his mother Mrs. Minnie Tu lish Street n cci, requested that the proposed construction of English north of Kohlman, which is considered a developer's financial responsibility to build be treated as a City project and be assessed. b. No action taken. 4. Maplewood Bowl: G. Anderson a• Mr. Gary Anderson stated he wished to discuss the questions the Council has regardingthe Maplewood q lops he has read that p od Bowl. b. Council discussed their concerns with Mr. .Anderson. c. No action taken at this time. 5. Sewer Contracting: DeLory Company P Y a. Mr. Bob Aberbach, representing DeLory Company, re uest ed Council revise theirordinance and allow persons other than a master plumber to obtain a sewerP ermit. b. Councilmember Anderson moved to rAfar ,. _4.-4.-- �_ _�_ 22 - t Seconded by Councilmember.Maida. Ayes - all. 6. Brookview Drive Assessment Method a. Manager Evans presented the staff report, b. Director of Public Works Haiderrese p nted theseveral alternatives for assessing the Brookview Drive Project No. 78-2 g 0. Councilmember Anderson moved to authorize alternative No. CI as an assessment method for Brookview D 1 Drive Project No. 78-20. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - Mayor Greavu; Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Juker. Councilmember Maida abstained. 7. Tree Removal Program a. Councilmember Bastian moved to table this• item until the first meetin in June. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 8• R.E. Rezoning - South of Lower Afton Road a. Councilmember Bastian moved to table this item to the 1st meeting_in June. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - a11. 9. Plan Update a. Councilmember Bastian moved to a rov as presented. PP e the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan Update �4 Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - y all. 10 Accounts Payable a. Councilmember Maida moved to approve :Expenses - Check N PP e the accounts (Part I - Fees) Services, No. 000327 through Check No. 000419 - $195,215.69• Che 0130.19 through Check No. 013144 - � Check No. through $140,3 40.49, Part II - Payroll Check No. 03610 g Check No. 03733 - $55,606.19) in the amount of39 $ 1,162.37. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes _ all. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Letter of Appreciation a. Councilmember Juker requested letters of a reciat-i Departments t PP on be forwarded to all the Police and Fire De P that took part in Director of Public Safet Richard W. Schaller's funeral y b. Council was informed this has been done. 2. Nuisance Ordinance - 23 - 5/6 a. Councilmember Juker stated trucks parking lot at all hours. Does are cleaning the Gladstone Comm unity Education the Cit City have.- an ordinance to control this nuisance. b. Staff to investigate. 3. Sideyard Setback — RE District a. Councilmember Maida moved to reconsider the Side ar d Setback. RE District Ordinance at the meeting of May 20, 1982. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes — all. 4. Pleasantview Park a. Councilmember Maida questioned if dirt is being hauled onto the Pleasantvi ewPark site. b. Staff stated as soon as easements are obtained the hauling' will begin. 10. 25th Anniversary a. Councilmember Juker moved to approve the followin li st of events for Ma lewood's 25th Anniversary Celebration that and a budget transfer of3 of osta e f rom the c $ ,000.00 Plus cost contingency ency fund be approved: DATE EVENT ---- ------ RESPONSIBLE PEOPLE Fall Maplewood Run Gary Bastian June 1 Button Sale Community Services June 1 T—Shirt Sale Community Services July 17 Open House Tours City Council Members & Staff July 17 Bus Tour of Maplewood Community Services August 14 Park Dance City Council — Comm. Services ces August 12 Recognition Banquet q City Clerk's Office ' August b, 79 8 City Wide Garage Sale Community' Services June 1—July 4 Contests Cit Council City c 1 —Comm. Services May 10—Dec 31 Postage Meter Cit Clerk's ' City k' s Office June 1—Dec 31 Flag Community Services Summer Flea Market Sale Cit Council it July 4 July 4 Celebration Community' Services July 21 Ramsey County Parade Cit Council City uncal Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes — all. 24 - 5/6 t, 5. East Lakeshore Drive Cul-de-sac a. Councilmember Anderson stated the County constructed a cul -de - Shore Drive and .removed the fishing area. He requested sac on East q sted that a letter be forwarded to the County referring the problem to them. 6. Ramsey County League a. Councilmember Bastian stated he has resigned as the delegate t Lee Ma' g o the Ramsey County League and moved that. Mar Y Maida be nominated as delegate, Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. b. Councilmember Bastian moved that $625 be transferred from the contingency account to pay the Ramsey County League dues. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. c. Mayor Greavu moved to appoint Norman Anderson be alternate delegate f Ramsey County League, or the Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 7. Definition of Family Ordinance a. Councilmember Bastian moved to reconsider the definition of f • at the meetin of Ma 20 19820 family ordinance Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - y all. 8. Rules of Procedures a. Mayor Greavu moved to amend the Rules of -Procedures to establish Council meetings as the 2nd and 3rd M the re lar Mondays of each month and that if necessary special meetings be established for the 3rd Thursday of each month, also staff - Council a enda session be established on therev0 Thursdays before each Council meeting., i Seconded by Councilmember Maida. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 9. Patrolpersons Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmember Anderson, Bastian and Maida. Nays - Councilmember Juker, a. Manager Evans stated there is a freeze on hiringpatrolpersons afro p P ons and he requested that he be authorized to hire two p 1persons. b. Mayor Greavu moved to authorize the Manager to commence the hiri•n of two patrol persons. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes -Councilmember Anderson. Nays - Councilmembers Bastian, Juker and Maida. - 25 - 5/6 c. Councilmember Juker moved to authorize the, mane er to proceed { with hz.rin one patrolperson. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - y s all. M. ADJOURNMENT 12:16 A.M. City Clerk — 26 — 5/6 t i Y� OF HAPLLWOOD NECK* A M 0 U N T A C C 0 U h T S P A Y A B L E DATE 0b-14-82 PAGE i C L A I M N T P U R P G S E 00 0 45 9 26#4 65 If;MA- RETIREMENT CORP ,DEFERRED COMP PAYABLE ANDDEFERRED COMPENSATION 000460 28, 167 • l 9 MA FLE WOOF STATE BANK FED INCOME TAX PAYABLE 100468 0 X90.04 1 + STATE OF MN STATE INC OME TAX. PAYABLE_..- 000462 20U,80 3 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYST - DEFERRED COMP PAYABLE _ 100470 Z+550.95 MINN STATE TREASURER MV LIL►ENSE FEES PAYABLE 000463 297.43 AF SCME LO�.AL 2725 UNION DUES PAYABLE )00472 343. MINN STATE TREASURER AMD -FA IR SNARE FEES PA YA BL a0 fl 4b4 2,59 4.20 ML TRO SUFERVISORY ASSOU UNION DUES PAYABLE 000465 l84.afl Mtn MUT UAu: LIFE INS CO DEFERRED COMP PAYABLE 300466 b 1 5, p0 RUSEM ARY KAN£ WAGE DEDUCTIONS PAY*484iE )OO4b7 157.50 MA FLEW003 STATCE BANK WAGE DEO UCT I ONS PAY A6LE 100468 632.25 Mrs TEAMSTERS LOCAL 320 UNION HUES PAYA6LE �Oayb9 2.0 0 11._5�- CITY +� CT Y CREDIT UNION CREDIT' UNION-_ P_E Cr PAYABLE--- - 100470 Z+550.95 MINN STATE TREASURER MV LIL►ENSE FEES PAYABLE 1 ou471 2 95.0 0MI NN STATE T REA SURER STATE D/L FEES PAYA Bi.E )00472 343. MINN STATE TREASURER STATE D/,L FEES �PAYAt3LE I00473 2,59 4.20 HI NN STATE TREASURER MV LILENSE FEtS PAYABLE 100474 l84.afl MINN STATE TREASURER STATE OIL Fl�+ LE 100 475 1948+•95 MINN STATE TREASUkER I MV L.IiENSE_ FEES PAYABLE 100476 75.50 RA i,-SEY CO CLERK OF DIST LNTY OIL FEES PAYA ISLE 100477 83.00 RA MSEY CTY CONCILIATION A/R — PARAMEDIC - 100478 80,000 MINN STATE TREASURER STATE OIL FEES PAYABLE 0 0 4T9 1 156.5 0 + MI hN STATE TREASURER MV LICENSE FEES PAT ABLE _� -�- .--0 0 4 BY9 6 �•MN • iI + PARKS ASSOC; ;00481 6 * 0 J SUBURBAN 'AREA ,MAMBER TRAVEL + _TRAINING 00482 2 1 927.00 MINN STATE TREASURER MV LICENSE FEES-PAYA TY of Mk P�.EWOOU A A C C O U N T S P A Y ii 8 L E DATE 06,ml4,wd2 PAGE 2 CHE -� C K A O U N T C L A i !� A N T M MM STATE TREk SUER STATE O/ L FEES PA YA. 000483 3b1• 0 I 40048 4 24,4, 3.50 METRO WASTE CONvTROL COMM 00u�r85 STATE D/L FEES PA* YAdLE OOW48r� SkFt Y MI NN STATE T REA SURER M 1�. I G E S z FEES .-- P Y A S L E COUNCIL INt� 17.0 0 MINN S.A.U. I'AYASLt TRAVEL t TRAINING D00 490 67.72 VAUGHNS SUPPLIES, PROGRAM -_ _-_-__ 0fl+BT 1b3. �► TREA SURER MINN STATE R . STATE D/L FEES PA* YAdLE OOW48r� 2, U 13 . by MI NN STATE T REA SURER M 1�. I G E S z FEES .-- P Y A S L E Goa 469 10 . G 0 GOVERNORS RNORS FORUMS TRAVEL + D00 490 ". 0 52� CHASE 6A% CO SUPPLIES t PROGRAM 330 495 23909-3 -- �- CONSTRUCTION CU, _ kt-FUNDD0u�9i20.44 MI NN STATE TKER -- DNR LICENSE_ FEES �PSL GUFF i�43 1.040.74 Mi NTN STAT. TRLAS-SUt-tTAx -SUR :H GE TAX PAYABLE- -- -_ _ --- - --r_ -U ER - - _MV_ LIL-.ENSEFEES ..P#4YABLE_ 2,4b1• 0 MINN STATE TRE#ks R 30u*94��. - " �� MINNSTAVE TREASURER _--_ STATE D/ L- FErS_ PAVA' 8LE 330 495 23909-3 -- MU NTGOMERY WARDS EQUIPMENT , OTHER MI NN STATE TKER -- DNR LICENSE_ FEES �PSL 100504 TREASURER LILENSE FEES- PAYABLE 139.9 "J,--S—TATEMV )00497 177*00 M�"_ NN STATE TREk S 3MEK STATE_ D/L FEES PAYABLE _ 30c,498 19662.37 MN STATE E T MEASURER-PEKA CONTRI BUT IONS.s PERA )a 0 499 39 9* 5• x 4 _�_. - - -- - .PE -�, - Pe E.R.A. DED PAYABLE._._-- NN STATE TREASURER R ANS -CONTRIBUTIONS, PERA -�—_- i * E P ERe . LED PAY ALE Ii 4500 9�Ob�3.23 Mh STATE TREASURER P R RA AND-GUNTRIBUTIONS PERA — 73.50 RA PSEV CO CLERK OF DIST )au501 CNTY D/L FEES PAYABLE 104 502 1� 502.50 MINN STATE TRE ►SURER MV LI4ENSE_ FEES PAYABLE 1005 . 03 154.00 MINN STATE TREASURER STATE D/L FEES PAYABLE MI NN STATE TKER -- DNR LICENSE_ FEES �PSL 100504 392.00 .100505 139.9 4 - 8� RY E VANS TRAVEL + TRAINING f OF MAP-LEW000 H E G K A H 0 U h T A C L 0 U N T S P #"4 Y A a L E G L A I H A N 7 04T 064&14,m82 PAGE P U R P 0 s rE, 3 332098 IC NA RETIREMENT CORP DEFERRED COMP PAYABLE -►0=�ti�'EAAED- -COMPENSATION FED INCOME T A X P A Y A t3 IlLm. MAPLEWQUU30u510 STATE BANK FED STATE OF HN STATE INCOME TAX PAYABLE --- -_ --=--- --Z-EfEkkE-0--,coOMP' PAYA -- 8 .L E R ETI kE HE NT—*S N STITE UNION DUES PAYABLE 300512 ZWe43 AF SOME LOLAL 2725 Atioewp4IR SHAKt FEES PA Y A tai 3flfl 5i3 2 0 0 Mi NN STATE TREASURER MV LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 07 zzzooi MY NN STATE TRU SURER D/ .L7 FEtS AYABLL 332098 IC NA RETIREMENT CORP DEFERRED COMP PAYABLE -►0=�ti�'EAAED- -COMPENSATION FED INCOME T A X P A Y A t3 IlLm. MAPLEWQUU30u510 STATE BANK FED STATE OF HN STATE INCOME TAX PAYABLE --- -_ --=--- --Z-EfEkkE-0--,coOMP' PAYA -- 8 .L E R ETI kE HE NT—*S N STITE UNION DUES PAYABLE 300512 ZWe43 AF SOME LOLAL 2725 Atioewp4IR SHAKt FEES PA Y A tai 3flfl 5i3 2 0 0 METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOt'*o- UNION DUES PAYABLE __ 100514 277 a a MN MUTUAL LIFE IN4 GO LEFERRED COMP PAYABLE 15 RC.St�MARY KA , t. Z LCT 10 NS P A'Y A Sim E A G* 51.6 2,7 Is 7 3 ------ MN BENEFIT ASSUC MBA INS PKYi BLE ;a"" 517 JL** I's 12 wIsCoNSIN OPT UF REVENUE STATE INCOME TAX PAYABLE _3 4-__- TY CREDIT UNION LREDI" UNION DEC PAY48LE "-a a 519 —MN STATE IREAS-UR. E"FIGA F*I*C*A* PAYABLE AND -&DUE 70 UTHER GQVT UNII 300520 42,63*00 MINN STATE TREASUK" t- R S!ATtE' 0/io. FEES PAYABLE 305 21 MINN STATE TK'EASUFEK MV LICENSE- FEES Pi4YABLE 7 MINN STATE DOCUMENTS 6 OOK S 300 523 49766*03 MINN STATt". TRCEASURER MV LICf."NSE FEES PAYABLE.' 300 524 187.0 0 MINN STATE TkEASURER STATE D/L FEES PAYABLE flCi525 u POSTMA�JEk POSTAGE 300526 105*fla INTL MFOA GAR - -a 0'-V-LUP TRAVEL + IRA ;06 527 MINN STATE TREASURER STATE D/L FEES PAY"BLL 0 39393033 MINN ST ATE TREASURER MV LICENSE FEES PAYABLE ©0529 � 74*60 RAVISEY CO CLERK OF DIST LNTY D/L FEES OAYA-,S.L.L--—. Tf OF MA-PiEW000 ACCOUNT S PAYABLE DATE 06�14-82 PAGE 4 CHECK* A M 0 U M T G L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S E 0 0 530 131.96 MONTGOMERY MARLS SUPPLIES , EQUIPMENT 0404.3-1 190.000 Q.R. M c Re yno lda C C,t-E -- Installation 000,532 125.0.0 MINN STATE TREASURE? STATE D/L FEES PAPA ELL 000533 3#916000 MILAN STAT. TREASURER MV LICENSE FEES PAYAB4:.E SUPPLIES, OFF-____.___ 40,0534o0.0 MN MINING+ FFG CO 000535 161.0 0 Mi h ST ATE TREASURER STATE O/ L FEES PAY4 BLE 0zi0 536 .39 640.50 Mi NN STATE. TREASURER MV LICENSE FEES PHYA 3;.E 76 EXPEtviDIT UR' ES SINCE .AST GOUNGI L MEETING 191:106• 8.5 NECESSARY i s r OF M�,P&EW0__ A C C O U N T S PAYABLE W TE 0E-14-82 PAGE. 5 n,HECK �! O U N T C �.► I M A N T P U R P 0 S _ X13255 80.50 - 33.0 0 85.5 0 AMERICAN AUTO TJUM! -_______ ,� _ - EA RL F ANGERSON + ASS��. APACHE _ PAF ER GV --- REP. TAINT • , VEHICLES MAINTENANCE MATERIALS SUPPLIES , JA NiT OR . L - _ - ____ -- _ j 13 2 5 7 2,027.50 ... �1RTCRAFT PRESS INS• SUPPLIES, OFFICE x132 129.1c7 ACTS TGWIt:G FUBLISH I NG ANS? -SUPPLIES, VEHI�;LE -325 5 ,�' 1 8w9.0 � _._ JA MES BAHT F -E—E,— S_, S E R V I G E— --- -- Building Inspector - - 013260 8 95.5 b -_ BERG -T (jRSET H INC S U P P L I.E S+ - 8.95 8L tit HERON BOOKSTORE SUPPLIES OFFICE --- -- ---- 013262 _ 3.2 b 3 a_i - 01326* - _ ___ _5 __---- 013 2 " 3 .0 0 13+� ... 18 . 9 223.7a , =o- SIU ARD OFWATERER COMM ..� 13K O WN PHOTO .. INC; C + H ioONTRACT INC INS _ - --- --- - -- - - _rMAINTENAMCE �. .s EQUIPMENT 1;0- A L ,- EQUIPMENT REP . + MAINT . , _E{�U I PMtN .-- ... --- _ -- - - - --- _ -- MAIHTENANLE MATERIALS MATERIALS 013266 - - u132b7 _ -- -- _ -- G132t�8 42.0 3 _ ��+.03 �+ wi•bl Cts IPPE WA S FRI NGS C O -- ES �UAST TO �LGAST STAR CULi.INS ELECTRICAL CONST FEES, SERVICE__-- --_ --- --- - . - Wa-t r baa lir REP. + MAiNT . , UTi�IT1� _ . ----- -- - - - - REP. + -T . , UTILITY MAIM ,ktiC-SUPPLIES �`s EQUIPM1EiiT - - y u132b9 01327 0 2�'S• u 0 �' 67.15 _ - -MAINT CG NSLLIDAT ED CONTINEc_. , GU PY tOUIPMIENT ENANLE -.-MATERIALS _SUPP LIES � EQUIPMENT _ . - _ 11�� T■ LT � CO 013271 ----- 013272 = X3.75 GkAWFu�CO DOOM ALES - OLNNLS S CUSIGK _ REP* + MAINT . s _BLDG+GROS TRAVEL + TRAINING _--------- - - __ --r t� 13 27 3 01_3.2 7 4 32� 5 - ---- 01327b ii 3277 120401 1 87.5 0 35.51 10.80 200.0) - :- _ CUSTOM LAO" ORATORIES INL COMPANY D4 HLEN SIGN CO DA �.CO LORF �______-- ---- - - -- -_ -- - - - �I SPAT GM -F IONEER FRESS $ARMY EVANS _ _ __ FEES, SEKVIGE Slide Duplicating SUPPLIES s PROGRAM - ---- SUPPLIES 9 .�a NIT oRI� L �SuaSCo �IPTIONS+MEMOERSNI VEHICLE ALLOWANCE _ Y OF MAPLEWOOD A Co C O U N T S P A Y A 8 L E E 6 r. SATE Ob -1x-62 P AG CHECK* A. M 0 U N T Co L A I M A N T P U R P U S E 0132T 8 6.50 04 NIE.L F FAUST- TRAVEL f TRAINING #J 1327 9 1410 b8 FL EX113LE PIPE TOOL CO Hsi INTENANCE MATERIALS 013297 1730 41 KN CX LUMBcR COMPANY AND -SMALL TOOLS X328 0 29.68 FRANKS NURSERY i;�4INTENAN61- CE MATERIALS 0132 1 650040 GENERAL REPAIR SERVICE REP. + MAINT • v_._.UTIL_ITY. 013282 20.0 0 GE ORGES . BODY SHOP REP* # TAINT . , . VEHICLES 13 2�s 3 210.0 �- L ONE I DEPT REFUND 0132 s 582.42 GOODY ' 4R SERVICE STORE. SUPPLIES ,_ VEHICLE -- - AND-wREP. t MAINT•, VEHI'CL 0132t�5 126.96 GOODYEAR SERVICE STORE SUPPLIES, v 13286 631.01 OU ANL GRACE FEES, SERVICE Temp.Inspector �i13287 5.95 NADH COMPANY BOOKS 013288 54.75 TH CMOS L HAGEN _ UNIFORMS �t_C L.GTHIN.G-------.-_.. 013269 29196.00 HA MMERNICK DECORATING CO FEES, SERVICE _ Paint _ Fire -Hydrants 013290 13. *43 MA RMON Gi.A SS SUPPLIES * PROGRAM i 3 2.91 013292 20.00 20.00 JOSEPH HOGHBAN UNIFOkMS f C LOTHIING JUGITH HORSNELL FEES, SERVICE Program Fee 013293 i8.90 INTL - bUS MACHINES CORP SUPPLIES 9 OFFICE 013294 60.24 INTL HkRVESTER CO SUPPLIES, VEHICLE 013295 27036 RA NDA LL *JOHNSON TRAVEL f TRAINING 013296 1 • b9 KN OWLANS SUPER MARKETS SUPPLIES* EQUIPMENT 013297 1730 41 KN CX LUMBcR COMPANY MA INTLNANt�E MATERIALS 013298 5, 780.88 LA IS BNNNIGAN t CIRESI FEES, SERVICE AND -LEGAL t_FI_SCAL - April Services 613299 32.50 RICHARL J LANG SUPPLIES, PROGRAM O133D0 12,189.50 LA NGULA HARDWARE+ EQUIPMENT, OTHER Y OF MAPLEWOOD A D C 0 U N T S P A V A 8 L E HE.0 K* A M D U N T' C L A I M A N T 13301 390.60 LE hFER INC 113302 19 071.75 LESLIE PAPER DATE 06-144082 PAGE, 7 P U R P 0 S E REP. + MAINT ., VEHICLES U-UPLICA7 INC --Z OSTS--------_.__._ 133G 3 i �i8.60 M , hoo PHOT G FEES, SERVICE --� 19221.36 NORTHWES7ERN BELL TEi CO ilm Proces-sing )13304 733.26 MAPLEWOOD PLBG f HTG INC REP. + MAINT., BL0G+GK-0S 113305 19.50 OFFICE MACHINE SALE+SERV SUPPLIES , VEHICLE 21 *19 Mc RIT CHEVROLET GO )13306 87,93y.93 MrE7RCi WASTE CONTROL COMM SEWAGE TREATMENT 113307 32.50 DANIEL METT LER SUPPLIES , PROGRAM RENTAL, EQUIPMENT 11330 d 125.0 J MN OEPART MENT PUBLIC 113309 ' 77e69 MINNESQTA FABRICS SUPPLIES, PR06RAM 113310 7.00 MINN STATE TREASURER SUPPLIES, OFFICE 113311 FEES 9 SERVICE 29263660 WI NF1rELD A MiTCHE.LL AND -LEGAL + FIS%A L April Appraisal Service_ fii-312 w _' 75.00 _ MOGREN BKOS LA'NOSCAPING _ __.MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 113313 741.68 MU NIC + PRIVATE. SERVICi FEESt SERVICE Animal Control 113314 223.40 NATIONAL BUSINESS SYSTEM EQUIPMENT, OFFICE ._ _ _ _ _ ._ A N 0 • F E t S ,� S E R V I C Z Microfiche Processing 43315 1e1.22 NOREN PRODUCTS ECUIPMElvi', OTHER 113316 761.022 NORTHERN STATES POWER? 4;0 UTILITIES !13317 �NORcTHERN STATES POWER CO UTILITIES -------- -- -_-- -- - -- _. _ 722. u 0 ►13318 313.3. NW SERVICE STATIUN EQUIPFEES, SERVICE . _ _ _ Fuel Tanks - 13319, e46.82 NORTHWESTERN BELT. TE" GO TELEPHONE 43320 TELEPHONE _- ----- ----- - - 123.17 NO KTHERN BLL. TEL CO 43321 497.511 NORTHWESTERN BELL TEL LO TELEPHONE 13322 19221.36 NORTHWES7ERN BELL TEi CO TELEPHONE 43323 6.00 LA VERNZ NUTESON _ TRAVEL f TRAINING __-_-------_-_-.. 13324 19.50 OFFICE MACHINE SALE+SERV SUPPLIES 9 OFFICE Y OF A PLEWOOD A C C O U N T S P A Y A 8 t DATE iU6-14-82 PAG- y * HECK* A M p U N T C L A I M A N T F U R P O S E .._---..._ ..__...__. 31335 . I7 0.5 0 OS WALD FIRE HOSE SUPPLIES 9 EQUIPMENT 313326 313327 12.66 - 27.50 PETRGLE�1AINT LO JOSEPH PRETTNER . Fi:ESt SERVICE. Testin Gas Tanks Testing S CLOTHING UNIFORM4 - ANG -TRA VEL } TRAINING . 313328 3�332g *x.85 625, 00 :. . PR CTE �T �AlRE SCA l�SEY COUNTY LEAGUE _ S U P P i I E S, VEHICLE—_____ SuoSCR IP 7 ION S+M EM BEKSH IP --- -- - - 31333 � 313331 - 2145, i -- - - 013333 ,. �,I3334 95.77 193.5 ------ „. _ 17�• �- � � 22y 5 u l 1�s • 7 3 _. - _. - - --- REEF INDUSTRIES INC Ri EE STREET CAR WASH RICE STREET LAr� ..• WASH r FcI GE STREET CA�c WASH_ ... RICE STREET CAR WAS FCO AD RES-UE...�. RES-UE iN�. SUPPLIES ; OFFICE- Rg.p, + MAINT . VLhICL _ _ _ SEP. + MAINT . , VEHICLES REP. # �M Iv ., V E H I C L f. S REP, + MAINT . ; VEHICLE S___... --- --- FCEP. + -MAINT . , VEHICLES 0133�� - _ --- ~ 5 -p p� I-E S-, CF F 10tot �13337 u1.3338 ci3339 - �_ • 9, 77.7• ...� 1, 296.75 -- T A SCHIFSKY } SUNS INS SCNUELL + MADSUN INC U L SHIt�-�.Y CO HAIN%NANCE MATERIA-LS _ .. __-- --- ___ - OUTSIDE ENGI NEEI% FEES __ --- ---- - —- MAIt�TENAi�GE �iATE�IALS �' 334 01 013341 1,3�5.�� 37.35 T;-HcNiOf�ICKSN SHORT ELLIO - ThE SKEP FEES, SLRWICE Stud Water y SUPPLIES • EQUIPME vT 013 342 1, 1323.82 SOIL EXPLC�ATION Cfl. FEES, SERVICE Testing Gas Tanks -53.43 013343 CHRISTINE SOUTTE Pt�ST�GE ANO-TRAVEL } TRAINING -- �-3_34+4 l 3 SW-p L-rE S-9—EQ U-1 P M E NS' -- -- --- �1335 606900 CITY OF ST PAUL Fire Run - 3 M Co . - _ - 3 �+6 013347 107.70 b .85 .. CITY OF ST PAUL _._- CITY OF ST PAUL REP. * MAINT • � RADIO013 REP* + M A I N T., RADIO 013348 46,9596.04 CI Tx OF ST PAUL FEES, SERVICE Ti.reTrotection Ilf �OF 14APLEWOOD HECK* A. ft 0 U N T ACCOUNT 600003 CITY OF ST S PAYABLE -ATE 06'w14'w62 PAGE C L A I H A N T F U R P 0 S E k-11 "I 13349 600003 CITY OF ST PAUL Fire Run - 3 M C®. 13359 22.7+ T#'-%RG#z.7 STORES IMOSupP, L -A' M ILS FRUGP% 13360 PAUL A-AXATENANCE M#4TERIALS- 13361 29453*56 CITY OF ST 1 553*00 CITY OF ST PAUL FEESv SERVICE � 13 351Police Crime Labe 1:5000 SUEU . RSAN AREA CHAMBER TRAVEL + TRA THING 113353 59*82 SUFER^MERICA _FUEL + OIL 1113354 106663 SUpr.RAMr.RICA 111.335.5 2,0107*06 SUFERAMERICA SUPPLIES, VE. H I-Cp L -E. FUEL + OIL _ U lil3356 SUPERAMERICA _F 13357 176975 _S U F E. R A M E. R I C A _ - --- - --- ---- AND -FUEL. + OIL _-SUPPLIES9 PROGRAM 286071 VAUGHNS SUPPLIES, OFFICE .13369 56*50 Wk GERS 22� * 90 WARNERS TRWEVALUE HDW SUPP4,.IE**,Nt .JANITORIAL x.337 L AND -SUPPLIES , VEHICLE AND.wMAINTENANCE MATERIAL ANO -SMALL TOUL.S 16*50 TABULATING SERV BUREAU FEES, SERVICE Data Processing 13359 22.7+ T#'-%RG#z.7 STORES IMOSupP, L -A' M ILS FRUGP% 13360 240',*00 J THO MAS --ATHLETIC CO - SUPPLIES PRUk,,2RAm 13361 2 i_ U1, TITi,wE INS Co OF M'"' NN GTHER ACQUISITION -COSTS---- 13362 9100,2 TG1'ZtK'9NGt OUV'LL 0 FLES, fl�GNSULTJNG ANO mQUTSICE ENGINEERIIG FE 13363 16*50 HERS Ti�USLEY FORD INC REP* + TAINT *9 VEHICLES FE"OS9 SERVIGL TWIN CITY F 10 SLR IN 37*50 .13364 Filters Cleaned 13365 1326.503 Uri IFORMS UNL IM1TED UNIFORMS + CLOTHING 133b6 6*50 UNIVERSAL MED IfflkAL SERV SUPPLIES9 EQUI-PHENT 1 367 RLP;+ MAINTat VEHICLES -m INSURANt"#E 1,127 •96 V#4 LS 8(oD V SHUF _-SUPPLIES9 PROGRAM 286071 VAUGHNS SUPPLIES, OFFICE .13369 56*50 Wk GERS 22� * 90 WARNERS TRWEVALUE HDW SUPP4,.IE**,Nt .JANITORIAL x.337 L AND -SUPPLIES , VEHICLE AND.wMAINTENANCE MATERIAL ANO -SMALL TOUL.S W OF MAPLE WOOD E,CK* A N 0 U N T ACCOUNTS P A Y A B L E C L A I M A N T �i33�i 54.59 wEBFii + tROSETH INC 113,372 7.26 WHITE bEAR OFFICE PROD L13373 568. b4 XE FcOX LO�RPU RATION DATE Wm14,w62 PAGt F U R P 0 S E 10 REP. t MAINT., EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES ,v EQU IP MEIiT DUPLICATING COSTS A.Nfl=ACCTS PAYABLE - NISC �1.3374 * i2.0 i� KR ISTINE KULZER WAGES, P/T ♦ TEMP • 113375 305.82 JEFFERV RASCHKE WAGES, P/T t TEMP. 1113,376 77 1.9 MA URICE WEINSLATT _ MAGES, P/T f TEMP* ►i3380 23.00 ZRENE ANDERSON _R E F U N 0 X1337 8 13379 4o. 0 0 23.03 AN ITA BETTY ANFi:NG BAKEMAN R K E F U E F U N D h D ►i3380 23.00 23.00 S£KNICE DENARC�U _ R E F U N 0 -_--- 23.40 23.0 0 RITA PURCELL FRAN T INNERS R R E E F F U U N N D 0 1 13381 '� 2 3.0 3 80 RGH I LD HA LKO R. E F U N D 113382 --- F U N D 23000 M1 L0RE D M O UC K R E 113383 2 3.0 3 FR IEDA J OHNS_ON k E F U N 0 ►13384 * 23.03 Ei.BE.RTA' KIEWEL R E F U N D 13385 ELSIE IE iU 8 I N S K I . �F U N D ----_. ------ is E � �� . 0 0 11.3386 * 23000 LUCILLE MCCARTHY R E F U N D _ 43337 * 23.0 0 MARIE NASCNZ R E F U N D --_ j1 33#38 0-- R E F U N PikUL MORRIS 1 2.0 0 .13:3e 9 23.0 0 DCS REEN MORTON - R E F U !� D 113393 * 23.43 ALLENF F NELSON R E F U N D (3391 23.00 PEARL 0 OLSON K E F U N 0 13392 23.00 FREADA PRIFSE R E F U N D - 13393 3.94 '� 23.40 23.0 0 RITA PURCELL FRAN T INNERS R R E E F F U U N N D 0 113396 * 23.00 LUCIlwLE TOOORA k E F U N 0 }' f M +PLE�IU0�3 ACCOUNT ,'ITY 0 S P A Y A$ L. E DikT 0f�•14-82 PAG: 11 f- CHECK * A M G U N T G L A I M A N T P U R P O E 613396 50.00 !. L.R• :• SUBSLRIPTIONS+MEMBERSHIP 013397 ib .0 a FUN SERVILE RENTAL, EQUI PMENT ---- ----- - 013398 16,000 BONNIE KFkR R E F U N C J13399 30,000 RICHARD VESELKA R E F U N 0 SUPt LIES , G AM -- ---- - 01 3 0 1x • 7 7 MA URIGE WEI N9LATT 013401 9.00 PU IBLIG TEGHNOLUGY INC EOOKS 01340 20.00 TO TcGW FEES, ��SERVICE -Nature Ctr Presentation �►1 33 1.00 GOMMUNiTY EnUCATIN CTR OTHER GONSTRULTIti CASTS 013404 80.00 JOHN FERRONE FEESip SERVICE -Nature Ctr. -`Presentation------ 151 231,62t�• 9 l;HECKS WRITTEN - TOTAL OF 229 GhEi KS TOTAL y22,733�.3� ITEMS FINANCED BY RECREATIONAL FEES -_ t tl ' M --ITY OF MAPLEWQfl PAYRt7L L REPORT PAGE i �- �' 0! CERTIFICATION #�EGISTEr� CHECK DATE Q6*w3 * .82 --- --GROSS NAME PAYNET * F,Y CHECK 0�0 3 7 E V A NQS Y BARRY � 1, 81 7.5 04036 LEWIS 11IVAN R 740.31 4b9•62 04038 PELOQUIN ALFRED - 040 39 -1�31•�4 .� SGNLEICHER JOHN F -- 10 6.25 _ 10 6 r 2 5 _ .040 0� CUCE �.AcFY 144.78 040+1 _ DDHERTY KATHLEEN M 214 1 .. ZUER ,HE JOHN L fl 4 3 .�T FAUST US DA�E�. I � 1��►4b.46 932.51 - _ 04044 NAGEN - �� , ______,_._ __� _ ._--____- __ __-- _.- _ __ __ _ _ a 2 4 fl 8.9 6 0 4 045 H�iTHEMS _ ------ AL' AL K - _ �7�•5 470 r 48 ___... __ O*u4G ViGGKEh! OELOR�.S 58b•b2 396.69 - __ r-------- 040 47 ., AURELIUS � UL I LL E E l, 3 5 u. 4b 682*4.0 t�4048 .. SELVOG SETT Y O 711.2 3 45 = b 04049 GREEN PHYi. LIS C 738.92 504928 _— .- - - 04050 Si;HAOT ANY L 110 38 1.1038 04051 ' SCt��OT J �� - _ L - 931.9 . 68 3 2 58.2 2 - 04052 v�E�o� - - -- � LO�K�rNE s 5bi• 09 382.41 04053 HENSLEY OO, PATKILIA � z 2 17 .2 2 6 40 54 BAST Y� �iGRNH flE�s ----- A 5 3 2. i b _ - -- 25 .9.7 7 0055 NkGEN THOMAS 1424.31 311.83 _ 04056 -----55 OMATH Joy E 3.39 :- 3 7 7 . �+ 0 0405 . 7 �tICKIE CA�DL L 488..31 _ - 30 .56 -- 0 4058 SiIENDSE� JOA14NE m 702.95 44G.t�8 -_ 04659 ARNOLD SAV 10 L _ 119171.39 411.73 0 4 #� b 0 AT G H I SON JOHN N _______.._. 1,03b•15 bb5•b4 ►ITV OF MAPLEWO pB PAYROLL Rr. t�r�Gt 2 --g�t_QL9 TAS NE _SO►�iY L1� io.77 b2�►. 0 — _ G X080 STI:.L GERTIFICAT I Oiv REGISTEe� G�iECK DATE 06-04-a2 w --- i 0140 STG�KT0141 . DAKRELL ~PAY NET PAY 624922 ZAP?JOSEPH bR3 SS _ME CHECK 040b1 �AHANES___�--- ANTHONY1�20�.92 --- a 116.69 04062 GLAUSON DALE K 1, 030.15 144.00 _-----._ _ - O Db3 --, -- COLLINS KENNETH _--._-._.._ DAVID _ 1�i7�•5�+ 96.92 -QU RIGMARD C w 335 51 Ow0 b5 FERNO W RAYMOND E 349.1 + 51099 04066 ---GREEN 636*76 NOKMAN L - 1, 195.85 KEVIN � _ h 016.77 4 9_7.5 b _- - ---- .- -- -CJ40 b8 I HE NZ STEPHEN 774,*46 475.26 040-69 HERBERT •T ti DAN E _TL4. 46 47 4.51 U407 I LANG R LHARD J i, 050.00 504.18 04072 -_ - V 171.25 + NGNULTY JOHN J 1, 19396,. 0074 METrLER DANIEL 8 ,03 .61 b4d.52 ----04075 `y- -Mi3ESCHTER R.ILLMN?0 M • - -M l o o .7_ X1..8 9 _-- _ T 0407 PELT I'ER wILLIikM F 192bo.66 696.68 --- -yG78 15 0 . b 8 SKALMAN DONALD w 1� 016.77 --g�t_QL9 TAS NE _SO►�iY L1� io.77 b2�►. 0 — _ G X080 STI:.L V E R N 0 h T 991038 --- i 0140 STG�KT0141 . DAKRELL T 997.38 624922 ZAP?JOSEPH A 1.197.23 741 5b - 04C 83 AER KER BEC RONA LD a 1, 417.92 37.0012 _-------...____-. 04084 --- SICK GU DENNIS S 1 429.5© 861.23 DAVID M ---1246-5 . 2 3 488.66 PAYROLL REPGKT PAGE 3 TY OF MAPLEWOOD � REGISTER` CHECK HATE Ob -G4-82 CERTIFIGAT;oN R . AME GROSS PAY NET PAY i� NECK H r ROGER W 1, 272.23 699.73 __.. 0 a 8 LEE .�.�...__+___._- i. F 2075 �.ANDEn JON0&+087 ME A 1* flb.23 _r ---- 1,1 �, . 27 695*49f4-6-88,- NELSON------ CA�.n L 04069 ftAZS�CAZ FF BALE E__ 119123.47 171603 _ _ 0090 RYAN MICHAEL P is 417.92 630.0 0 _lo o9i $ART A 0 E R E 1,116.5 9193*64 - `� 0410 3 VURWERK 04#092 T Y UUHGK JAM.S G i 167.4D 656041 _--- - =' 0093 EM3ERTSON JADES M 944.31 610.38 D0 9�+ St OT R 82�+. a� 350.35 04116 1� ALFRED C 04095 FLAUGHER f L - - 677.54 432.72 04096 FULLER JAMES G 586.62 426.6.2 KAREN A -- --- b22,* 87 40 3 8 5.81 a97 NELSON ROBERT O 1,17 5 .54 619.5 3 _. 04096 NELSON ._.�_ 04099 RA BI NE JANET L 549•69 37Z.1D . 0�10D TUCHNER MICHELE A DUAHE J 1.9055o54 451.22 -- fl� 101 WILLIAMS -- 641a2 $ART A MARIE L 453.69 324.90 - `� 0410 3 - NA11DER KENNETH G - I � 3 � �; � 8 . ' 207988 0.+10 4 wEG w�RT H_ JUC�TH A - - 490.62 349.30 - --- 04105 LASS WILLIAM C 1,157.08 552.8 2 - _____._ 34106 -- - FREBERG R O N k Lu L 624 0 0 491019 D�iDl_ HELEY RONALD J 8 2.0 0 5 i d. 6.3 t�041.06 . LN8AN Hu� JOSEPH H 756.80 5 01.0 7 - 04 i D 9 KA NE MICHAEL R 82�+. a� 350.35 04116 KiAUSING HENRY F 86.54 451.00 JI F oP H�PL�WOC�O PAYROLL REPORT PAGE •TY Cr. RT I FICA? I ON REGISTER EHci;iC DATE Db-fl4-82 NAME PAY HES PAY t;NEGK ii yEYER R 0 G A E N 41 - ' PREIT�E� JOSEPH 699.52 - - - --------- ---___----______ REINERT ED A RD A 8 2 4.0 • 63 499.3 0 04115 ELI S JAMES �' 9 81.59 589.21 - - - - - -- - --_ - - ------------ F, 0 .16 - --- GAN EL -- PETER ----- R __, . D 33 3 0 0.4 5 4 -►1____--- _ �i �. 5 K _ WALT E K - 1 5T .81 ---- -- 6a5.21 _893.54 GESSE6E JANES T 583.28 ---- --- -- �_-- 04119 ;DENNISS PEAK -- L - . b 9 981 4 94.0 5 -'z fl -; 1 P I L- T Z K £3 A .- JAMES N �� X54 536.43 {i 21 D41 W.YNAN _ _--- - --- .- - - _ - _-__ _ _._._ fl1�UiG P 564.6 Z 3 8 0.8 7 0122 Lutz . . 3 Bi�ENEi - R0G�..K N 47 0.3 �i124 EOSIN DAVID- 8 87 9.38 - - 04125 5 M L WEE GEu K GE ii 473027 - - �� �+ RD .� 8 4 8.1 3 9 -- _ 0 4 12 7 Hut -SON -- i�111tRi.iE S- i i2b.80 479.74 - 041.26 Qui E N GERA LU E 840.06 481.96 Q 8.6 0 4 51.3 i -_ -- n X130 MU L V NFY - DENN I� 876•x+0 517.37 _ - -- _.- 013 1 #3RENNER LOIS 677.54 253.71 . 2b3.92 13.31 D 413 3 ODEGAR�3 ROBERT 19 3b*.77 821.79 _ -- __ -- - D134 -_ _- ----_ ------ STAPLES ----_ PAU61NE m ----------- 1 '0 5 •9 2 E 71.5 +� 13U t�f�KE MY ES R Q _ 82 go - _ 4 4 0.5 TY OF MAPLEW000 PAYROLL REPWRT P.A GE 5 I C HEC K NAMc CEKTIFICATIOt� REGISTEK Gfi OSS PAY CHECK DATE 06.04-82 NET PAY - ---.---- 0.4136 GE RMA IN OAV I D A 83_4.08 520.91 04137 GUST NDA MEL V Iii J 1,12 6 .8Q 612035 ROLAND 8 834.08 533.92 04133 LEMON JEFFREY S 86.40. 86 4 0 04140 LISHARDT THOMAS D 269000 238.49 s 04141 MAS VSKA MASK � - A 831. T3 --- 525.92 04142si'dHKE ALBERT F 326.00 292.90 04143 SAN i A REE.O E 652*62 6 478059 .04144 STARK RIDHARD E -_ 262.00 2 6 2. 00 Oi145F1N►L) _ TRLY G 166.00 166.00 04146 TAUBMAN DOUGLAS i 801►.OD 497.14 04147 WAND R0Y G -_ 3206.62251.86 _-_------__ - - 0 148 GK"to W JANET --- M 684. X32 4 3 5. T i 0*149 SUUTTER DHRISTINE 184.92 463.39 04150 G-ti��t3ECK Jl3u- - M -----__ - Til • 23 - __.___ 2 90.5 04151 OLSON GEUF FREY N __. 1 � 34u .31 6 01.33 015 2 4 EKS T RAND THOMAS G 918.14 3 55 .0 8 04153 JOHNSON RAND ALL __._ L 944•19 581.82 04154 OSTROM It 133.54 697.48 04155 WENGER R06EKT J 857.54 4 82. T 4 CHECK REGLSTER TOTALS 102 912 . 2 � 9 5 3 , 843.21 PAGE 1 J� MMPLEWD�0 PAYRJL.L REPORT t C�rcTlFaCA1 ION �. �- KE.GIST� CHECK DATE 05-21-82 _ --- - --- ---- -- -..__. _ NAML GROSS SAY NET PAY H c K L ... r LF Will • �iA�.Y W 27,.06 256.5 03914 3ASTIAM J QM G 350.Q0 251•b3 GR E A V U -2 7 6 2 -_ MARY L E E T 27 2• Q0 237.29 _._.._. - ., x3917 MAIDA M . _. t3 AK' ik Y � 1' 817.54 0391 b E Y A W S _ 3 39Z 0 PELUQUIN 6-0 ` 7.23 173.83 03921 SGHLEIGM£K JOHN F 125 .38 125..38 __3 .u3�23 C O HERT Y KAT H L.EEh 0 � • � 0 21 A . 0 8 _- -- _v. _____ _ --- - p3y2� ZUERCHER .JOHN E 13,5.39 115.21 .V.. 3 2 i-5 I--- _ - r i !� J 666.92 396.13 - 3 y 2 b H A G c N. ---. 3927 MATHEYS. AEwNA K 6T7•54 470.4.8 .. ��� .�� .-. ps. Ink .tea. • �L��I ��.E E 1, 35 0.4b a3929 A U�CELZUS -- SET � Y C 711.23 44�►.71 03930 c VCG s � -- :-2 JEAN NE i 319 . b 8 2 5 8.2 2a39 3 SGHACT -- _ . �,GF�rcNiNE S 5bi.b9 . 378.21 D393,3 V I ETOL ___-- 1 --- -z 2:-9 kA D3 .. , 532.1b 253.17 03935 8 A S T M G E 80 H A --______- _ THOMAS Ls 1 42�:.31 304•b3 33936 i'iAfatN .._.-- �oF mAPLEW003 b E.- C K h Am E PAYROLL REPORT CERTIFICATION RLGISTER GROSS PAY PAGE 2 CHECK DATE. 054m214w62 NET PAY 72663b 453977 9 SVEkOSEN J . . ................. A Im I&W A J -OH tv ANTHONY G 1,9 20 4 )39-42 GAHANk���3.yS 13cj*3 GLAUSON BALE K 1.11 03be15 155.75 IF,&# ft z I- - wiftho a I's I's )3945 OR E GER flAN N it 23 14.22 03946 FERNOW RAY M ONU?*' E DAVID ILI$ 17 1.039 404*73 . . ................. A Im I&W A J -OH tv ANTHONY G 1,9 20 4 )39-42 GAHANk���3.yS 13cj*3 GLAUSON BALE K 1.11 03be15 155.75 IF,&# ft z I- - wiftho a I's I's )3945 OR E GER RICHARL C. it 23 14.22 03946 FERNOW RAY M ONU?*' E 496077 33948 HAL,WEG 522.11 ;3949 Hr..& N Z ST EP HEN 77+.45 494*51 dw low it ) 3951 JAQUITH GK M IEL 77 46 .493*76 ' 3952 KURT US DON A' LD v 203*36 .164,e 11 13 9 54 MCNULTY JOHN 168*63 33955 MEEHAN9JR JAMES E 997038 543*b9 . 0 i —767 2.2 1p 33957 M0ESGHTrl'.'-R RICHARD 19016*77 137*48 _ -- - - .33958 MORE LLI RAY J 669*79 3 --WW-6 )3960 SKALMAN IDONA •LD w 1,9054o9D L82607 ----------- 33961 STA' FNE GREGORY L I WIN 0% e% OF hr. o'APLEWOOD PAVF%V`LL REPURT PAGE 3 f*&, GER-TIFICATION REGISTER CHECK DATE 05.21-8 2 NEGC NET. P AP Y NA GROSS PAY Q M c A a c 7 t A r- Ad:r in lk 1 -8 6-2 w to a 03964 ZAPPA JOS E PH A 03965 BECKER RONALD 0 AL 103•.36 238.53 el 55 * 89 Q3967 GRAF DAVI 0 M 19 065.23 501*56 v39(08 LLE ROGER w :J'o id 3.1? 668*44 19077,*02 634a11 0 NELSON C A 0 L H 1, 091.77 707065 03971 itAZSKAZQFF BALE E 19094o32 177.98 03973 VORWERK ROBERT E 19 Ob 5.2.3 176.095 u `3974YOUNG-" K EN JAMES 19077,*02 634a11 *Ap 03970' SChADT ALFRED c 19 121*54 657035 63977 FLAUGHER JAYME L 677*5 4 432*72 -&3 r% CA twill&, A Ad 25-- 03 979 NELSON KAREN A 617006 362678 03980 NELSON ROBERT a 1917 5.54 613*68 nu 30 9 wrl -, I —R A-6 E A u Olt 1#0 7-2 -qf-1-0 ------------ TUCHNER MIGHELE A 617*08 296*76 0396 . 3 WILLIAMS DUANE i 19855e54 470*77 03-9-8 wp%r% I HAF% &o 33 -2 4 -o-9- 0 03965 HA DER KENNETH Cv 1. 391.08 3071088 0390-6 WE G WrE' RT H JUL11TH A 49G*62 349030 w i T A C N.- ^ :-8-22 -55 io I'V'OUF n04PLEW000 FAVKK JiL REPOT PAGE 4 04004 LUTZ 34005 BRLHEIM DA V I D P 562.82 ROGER w 769.60 383.87 - 470030 "-B b ------- os" - --0-A-W 549.9 ?- 7 7 MU L NEE GEC' GE w 76 y.60 47 3.2 6 04+006 NADEAD EDWARD A 845.76 555.09 0 T -6-: 8 -5 .--0'0 - 0�j10 OMEN GENA LU C 86+0.00 481.96 31#011 MACDONALD JOHN E 906.80 451.31 �- CERTIVICATION REGISTER CHECK DATE 05--214082 CHECK NAME. GROSS PAY NET PAY - 03969 HELEY RONALD 1 824.00 518.63 03,990 MOCH13AN JOSEPH H 75-0080 501.07 ---t --U. -----�� 03992 KLAUSING HENRY P 856.13 448.47 U3993 MEYER GERA LD w 662o43 420.13 -- 0-Ef�H - 1 ;7078- U3995 REINERT EDWARD A 824.00 518.63 03996 TEV6lN,JR HARF%Y 1 625.69 499.30 -- -- .,i AttE . - 03998 GANZEL PETER k 336.00 300.45 03999 GEISSLEn WA4:1TER% M 935.08 543.47 40 4T Aw li w --.,-E 92 .-3 f 04 0 01 PLGK DE.NN IS L 981.69 494.0 5 ' 44002 PILLATZKE DAVID 1 11157.08 771.89 war w w %F I "pq Ill ;7 1 0 ;o mr3f� 5 943 -- 04004 LUTZ 34005 BRLHEIM DA V I D P 562.82 ROGER w 769.60 383.87 - 470030 "-B b ------- os" - --0-A-W 549.9 ?- 7 7 MU L NEE GEC' GE w 76 y.60 47 3.2 6 04+006 NADEAD EDWARD A 845.76 555.09 0 T -6-: 8 -5 .--0'0 - 0�j10 OMEN GENA LU C 86+0.00 481.96 31#011 MACDONALD JOHN E 906.80 451.31 �- OF M P EWOO FAY-OLL kEPORT PAGE 5 CERTIF11;AIION REGISTER CHECK DATE 85-21-82 HECK NAME GROSS PAY NET PAY 3--- 04014 KRUMMEL BARBARA A 299.13 144.54 00,016 0 EGARD ROU RT. D i, 364.77 621079 C. 127A :-6-- _._.._ 017 BURKE MYLES 824e3O 433.57 040016 GERMAIN DAVID A 631.73 515.40 S�S►&A - 19 9 .-a. 1. - 0 ata HELEY ROLAND 8 831.73 532.63 04021 LEMON JEFFREY S 102.60 102.b0 04023 HARUSKA MARK A 624.00 $09.68 04024 RASCHKE ALBERT F 278.80 246697 -� 5- A294026 TAU6NAN DOUGLAS 1 497.14 04027 WARD R0Y G 328.62 251*66 3 9 .- ------. 04429 SOUTTER CHkISTINE 742.71 495.Q9 04030 CHLESECK .iUC1f M 711.23 286.34 i 1. fift3 }-------.------,8� )4'032 EKSTRAND THi)HAS G 932.83 560.26 940033 JOHNSON RANDALL L 927.92 585.22 "A- INAOX IV 34035 WENGER ROBERT 1 657.5+ 462o74 4EGK REGISTER TOTAi.S 103,9 0610:0 . 54, 6T7.85 MEMORANDUM T0: City Manager FROM: Director of Public Works DATE. June 7, 1982 SUBJECT: County Road B and Atlantic Stop Signs A number of residents have requested four-way stopsigns at Count Road g y Band Atlantic, It is their feeling that the additional traffic controli w 11 make the intersection safer. This is not necessarily so. As the Council is aware there are criteria established in the Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices to evaluate the safety of . aro osed installation, p p Ramsey County will -perform the needed work to evaluate the intersection using ing the manual's criteria if Maplewood submits a request, It is recommended the City Council adopt the attached resolution p e esol uta on requesting Ramsey County to install four-way stop signs if -the warrants of the Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices are satisfied. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, residents in the vicinity of County Road B and Atlantic Street have requested four-way stop signs at the intersection, and WHEREAS, a number of asci dents have occurred at this intersection NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL that it requests Ramsey County erect four-way stop signs ns at the intersection of County Road B and Atlantic Street if the warrants are satisfied as established in the Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, May 28, 1982 ' .Ramsey. County DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 3377 North Rice Street Saint Paul, Minnesota 55112 (612) 484-9104 Mr, Ken Haider City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 County Road B & Atlantic Divisions of: Engineering Maintenance Mobile Equipment Environmental Services Attached is a petition delivered to this office regarding the placement of 4 -way stop controls at the above referenced intersection. As. you know, Ramsey County Public Works will not make a recommendation to the County Board or conduct the appropriate study without receiving a request from the 9 affected municipality. After receipt of this request, a study will be conducted to determine if the necessary conditions exist aser the warrants of the Minnesota P Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. A recommendation will then be submitted to the County Board. Please take whatever action you feel necessary in this matter. Ifou have any questions, please call. Y Paul- Kirkwold, P.E. Traffic and Planning Engineer PK:m cc: Bill Armistead 1233 East County .Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 RECEIVED JUN 3 1982 CITY Ur MAPLE`. ��IN vO ENGINEERING OFFICI TO RAMSEY COUNTY FROM RESIDENTS OF COUNTY ROAD B & ALAN T I C SUBJECT PETITION FOR 4 -WAY STOP ON COU " COUNTY ROAD"B & ALANTIN Due to the numerous accidents that have occure of Al antic and count d on the corner y road B we the residents of this area would like to petition to have a 4-waystop this P on his corner. There have been several accidents in the ,last four years that are on record at the Maplewood Police Station. Several have landed or ended up in the yards o f t cars children la in y he people whose play these yards. Lets not wait until one of th children are hurt or killed or someone i e in of those cars is . Thank You NAME ADDRESS 0144010 / Y--4 v OOF t_ s �71 ,. 11.4::� /-� 7 Z� �� J MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Associate Planner --Johnson' SUBJECT:, 1980 Census - Neighborhood Statistics Pro yam DATE: J _ g- une 3, 1982Z. 'Request Send a letter to the Census Bureau to reaffirm Ma lewood .p s 1.979 request for participation in the U.S. Census Bureaus Neighborhood Census s Program. Background On January 29, 1980, Maplewood r. equestedarti ci ati on i n p p the Neighborhood Statistics Program (letter enclosed) . At this time, the Census Bureau is asking interested communities' to reaffirm their desire to participate In this program. There will be no h ar 9 charge for Participation if our request is postmarked by July 2, 1982. Through this program, population socio-economic • o c and housing statistics will be generated for each of Mapl ewood' s thirteen neighborhood g planning districts. This information cannot be generated from other census infor- mation that will be available to Maplewood. Recommendation Authorize the Mayor to sign the enclosed letter' to reaffirm Maplewood's desire to participate in the Neighborhood Statistics Program, mb Enclosure: Letter dated January 29, 1980 . s ` CITY OF M. APLE WO ID 1902 EAST COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA 5510 9 -- x 0 - OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT = 7704 560 June 3, 1982 Director, Decennial Census Division Bureau of the Census Washington, D. C. 20233 NEIGHBORHOOD STATISTICS PROGRAM As Mayor of the City of Maplewood, I hereby request that our co, unity be included in the Neighborhood Statistics Program. This letter is to reaffirm our request of January 29, 1980 (see enclosure) . A current map, indicating the residence of each of Ma pl ewood' s eleven Planning Commission members is attached. The boundaries of the th i r - teen neighborhood planning districts have not changed. Our local contact person continues to be: Geoffrey Olson, AICP Director of Community Development 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 (612) 770-4560 If you desire any further information, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Olson. JOHN C. GREAVU, MYOR - CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA z ic - enc. . CITY O� MAPL.]EA/V00D 1902 EAST COUNTY ROAD Ii MAPLEWOOD9 MINNESOTA 55109 '4 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - 456( 7 70 4561 January 29, 1980 Mr. Earl J. Gerson, Chief Decennial Census Division Bureau of the Census U. S. Department of Commerce Washington, D. C. 20233 Dear Mr. Gerson: Re: Neighborhood Statistics Program Please be informed of the City of Maplewood's intent to participate in the Neighborhood Statistics Program. Maplewood is a first ring suburban commu*ni ty of St. Paul , Minnesota, Since incorporation in 1958, we have grown from a population of 10,000 to a current estimate of 28,500 persons. By the year 2000, we are expected to have grown to about 40,000 persons,, Since the early 1970's. our community has recognized thirteen neighborhood planning districts. These districts relate to your program eligibility criteria as follows: 1. Official Recognition In 1972, Maplewood adopted its. initial Comprehensive Plan (see enclosed resolution of adoption) . Fundamental to the adoption of that plan, was the official recognition of thirteen neighborhood planning districts (see enclosed map) . A Land Use Plan for each neighborhood is presented in our Comprehensive Plan, 2. Nonoverlapping Boundaries As illustrated on the enclosed map, Mapl ewood's thirteen neighborhoods are mutually exclusive i n area and cover the entire community, 3. Advisory Representation i Maplewood maintains a policy that the Planning Commi sstn should be as geographically representative of the community as poss'i bl e . The enclosed neighborhood map illustrates the location of each P1 anni ng Commission member. Eleven of the thirteen neighborhoods are presently represented, • Mr. Earl J. Gerson, Chief r t q� E� IWM January 29, 1980. .I i r The neighborhoods in which growth or redevelopment is occurring are i{ and will continue to be represented. The public hearing process also plays a significant role in the City's decision making process. 1 Maplewood feels very strongly that broad based citizen input is _ essential to making the decision making process respons i vi to local needs. Census data on a neighborhood basis, as defined by the Communi ty, has not been available. Mapl ewood's shape is very irregular, presenting problems in acquiring census data for the "leg" area. As a result, the Neighborhood Statistic Program would be a valuable asset in future planning efforts. Our Director of Community Development is on your mailing list for this program. You may continue to direct all future correspondence to: Geoffrey Olson, Director Community Development 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 ..Thank you for this opportunity to work with the Bureau of the Census in developing a much needed data base. We hope to hear from you in the near future. Very truly yours, John C. Greavu, Mayor JCG/jc enc. ro: - CITY Of y MAPLEWOOD RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Ws: 2i r Y: i -i Zi reOSEL AWN , s; W A C °I,�I 15° 10 NOLLOWAY . Residential Land Use Neighborhood Planning Neigbborhood Density Groups Planned 1978 Area No. Name RL RM RH Populations Population 1 Western Hills 1472 380 949 2801 1407 2 Pa rlC s i de 4819 1140 977 6936 3 382 3 Koh 1 ma n Lake 2519 1303 0 3822 553 4 Hazelwood 3795 1122 2037 6954 2207 5 Maplewood Heights 2059 1991 140 4190 1822 6 Sherwood Glen 3186 851 781 4818 3115 7 Gladstone 3358 -833 .0 4191 3424 8 Hillside 3025 1358 1932 6315 3.702 9 Beaver Lake 3062 2715 1869 7666 - 4401 10 Battle Creek 1656 0 140 1796 1067 11 Vista Hills 2806 1102 - 586 - 4514 1022 12 Highwood 5046 0 0 5046 969 1.3 Carver Ridge 3404 0 .0 3404 231 TOTAL 40,227 12,815 9r411 62,453 27,300 s SOURCE;Midwest Planning and Research, Inc.,.) 979 i Q PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBER 1982 10 NOLLOWAY . JPPER •. A FTON 110 LOWER ..�4 � i 13 159 WWNENV A t W v coprow ------ JPPER •. A FTON 110 LOWER ..�4 � i 13 159 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the Cit my called and held in the Council Chambers i a ' `%e 20th day of September, 1973 at 7:34 n said City on a • � P. M. A following members were resent: . �1 Lester G. Axdahl, Mayor • ` • John C. Greavu, Councilman Harald 1. Haugan Councilman _ Donald E. Olmstead, Councilman 5. ]Donald J. Wiegert, Councilman jl r The following mcmb ers were absent: None. Councilman Olmstead introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: doption. 73 - 9 - 218 WHEREAS, the Maplewood Planning Commission has: 1, Conducte4 a review of the Village's s ors, development factors; • g p c . 2. Considered the existing and projected population characteristics* 3. Evaluated the community facilities of parks schoolsublic buildings, fire and police and utilities; p .a =± 4, Given thorough consid g eration to the Village's street system; and WHEREAS, the Maplewood Village Council believes that it is in the best interest., of the Village of Maplewood to have and use a Compreh.ensi.ve Municipal Plan to guide the Villages future development; and WHEREAS, the Maplewood Planning Commission has devoted considerable • o szderable time and effort in developing a Comprehensive Municipal Pian which: 1. Recognizes and advances community -wide planninggoals designed ivea to ' g g g n indication to the desired direction and quality of the life desired for the citizens of the community of Maplewood; - 2. Suggests public objectives and policies which are designed to provide g guidance in the implementation ementa t ' "Plan" p ion of the Plan so as to raise the level of community planning from that of a mere techni ue to one o being technique,, f eing conc,!rned • with both means and ends; 3. Advances plans, objectives, policies and standards directedand aimed .prim- arily towards providing a publicly adopted guide plan for achieving a coordinated and planned physical environment for -the Village; 4. Provides an outline and format for expansion of the 'Plan" into detailed _ plans relating to other environmental aspects of the cornmunit 7 s development y P -- S. Indicates action methods and "Plan" practices whereby the Pian can be implementer z to guide the community in achieving an overall orderly development; and WHEREAS, this Comprehensive Municipal Plan and its corn on' P p e'nt elements has been • presented to many interested citizens throughout the Village and - g g has been met with general approval; and WHEREAS, the Maplewood Planning Commission has followed the guidelines as set forth in the State Planning Enabling Legislation (Chapter 670, Laws of 1965 amended) as to what items should be considered for inclusion within a Comprehensive Municipal Plan, and - WHEREAS, the Maplewood Planning Commission has conducted the necessary public hearing as is required within the previously stated laws; and `WHEREAS, the Maplewood planning Commission and the Maplewood Village Council have_ given consideration to all evidence and testimony submitted at such hearing on the adoption of the Village's Comprehensive Municipal Plan; WHEREAS, the Maplewood. Village Council has reviewed the Maplewood Planning Commission adopted Village Comprehensive Municipal Plan in detail; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Maplewood . Village Council adopt the amended Village Comprehensive Municipal Plan entitled "Plan for Maplewood" attached hereto, Seconded by Councilman. Wiegert. Ayes - Mayor Axdahl, Councilmen Raugan, Olmstead and Wiegert. Days - Councilman Greavu. .ATE OF lei INTN E S O TA. COUNTY OF RAMSEY S S . . CI TY OF H"LEW'OOD . I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the 20th day of September, 1973, with original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to adoption of the Comprehensive Municipal Plan. Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this 34th day of April, 1975. ity Clerk z City of Maplewood, Minnesota MEMORANDUM TO:. City Clerk FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Tax -Forfeit Properties P s DATE: May 25, 1982 The City Engineer and I have reviewed the enclosed notices of tax -forfeit land, We make the following findings: 1. Parcels 57-69700-050-14 . and 570067900-060-14 are needed for a drainage pond. 2. Parcel 57-02510-050-57 is needed for a drainage pond. 3.. Outl of A, Netnorl i n Addition is not needed b ' y the city. 4. Parcel 57-58800-200-02 is not needed b the City y Please take whatever action is necessary to maintain drainage rights over a ' 9 the above parcels indicated for such use. mb cc: City Engineer Enclosures: Letters from Anthony J. Reiter dated 3-24-82, 12-5-80 and 10-17-78, 17 78. x tor s; w ,t i _ � a w �f • 1 N December 5, 1980 'CERTIFIED VAIL John Greavu, Mayor ' City of Maplewood 1330 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Ila 55109 Dear Sir: Attached hereto is a list of lands which forfeited to the State of Minnesota on August 11, 1980, for non --payment of real estate taxes Said lands have been declared as non --conservation lands by Resolution No. 80-1150 of the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners dated December 1, 1980, a copy being enclosed. Approval by local government of the c lassi.Lication and. rale of tax for. felted lands is required by law. Attached is.a sheet of general information and a suggested Resolution Forza for submission to your City Council When Council action has been taken, please return a certified copy of the resolution to the Office of the Land Commissioner, Room 109, Court House, St. Paul, liinnesota 55102. Yours very truly, A14THONY J,* RE ITER Land Conmiissioner By GEL/kt Attach. __ \ CC( Lucille Aurelius, Cle k WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners of Ramsey County by Resolution dated classified as non -conservation land, certain land lying within the limits of the City of and WHEREAS, A copy of the classification resolution together with a list of the land classified has been submitted for approval of the classification in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Annotated, Section 282,01, sub. 1; and WHEREAS, The City of has determined that said land is required for purposes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That said classification of the land shown on said list as non -conservation land is hereby approved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the proper City officials be and hereby are authorized to make an application for conveyance of said tax forfeited land for purposes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the City Clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution and application for conveyance of said tax forfeited land in the Office of the Land Commissioner, STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) I, Clerk of the Citv of do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copv of a resolution passed by the Council of the City of r at its meeting held on the day of 19 City Clerk SEAL i CLASSIFICATION LIST December 1, 1980 ,e].of1 NOTICE TOWNSHIP RANGE Nom, SUBDIVISION OR OR ILOT BLOCK CITY OF MAPLEWOOD / t 114 S'%?(08„2 Unplat 1.atted Lands .. shi 2 Ran a 22 - (Except the North. 2 �+ eet and except e ept the i East 396-5/10. feet), a North 654 feet of part of the Northwes ter of 'the Northow � i I west Quarter of Cre moor Subject to roads)' in Section 11, TZ R22 -01 -- I 9 57 l�.o o40 30 l r Pflueger' s Addition to Gladstone RamseyCount I Minn _ Y South one-half of vacated alley adjoining i and ! 20" 21 57-58800..200-'02 I ; I 1 i i l I i � t 1 ; f I I ' s I f I { I i y I 1 � ' C LASS IFICAT ION LIST September 26, 1978 11 Pag e 5 of 8 1 TOWNSHIP RANGE NOTICE SUBDIVISION I' OR OR No. j LOT BLOCK CITY OF MAPLEWOOD i I i 4j. Un fatted Lands - Township 29, Range 22 36294 1 Subject to Stillwater cutoff and (except the i West 642 feet), part of the North Three -Fourths (N 3/4) of the Northwest one -Quarter {NW) + of the Southwest One -Quarter (SW -14) southerly of the center line of said cutoff and westerly of a line running northwesterly at an angle of 63 degrees 37 minutes with south line of said f North Three -Fourths (N 3/4) from point thereon + �. 8 feet east from the west line of said I l03 � Northwest One -Quarter (MI u) of the Southwest � 1 1 T2 R22 57-02510-050-57 Cine -Quarter (SW ,� ), all in Section 25, 9 36297 36327 36328 36329 36330 36332 s Netnorlin 1 } outlo t + i CITY of X.OUN Dailey.'s Hill S "EW + vie -4 Addition Random's First Addlktion CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON ifinlatted Land - Township 30 Ran e 23 f I i A 57--54600-240-01 (Except Wi dNiard Terrace) ; part othe Southwest a -Quarter (SW 1) of the Southwest One -Quarte (SW 1 lying southwester of a line runningf om a point on the north lin of and 800 l feet west from the northeast corner of aid , Southwes Qne- anter(SW 1) of the Sout west � u One-Quar er (SW �) to point on -south line f and ) I '%1 ^ i. ., i. .i�•. _ .i - r w .�. • i -t • •• 40 • - NM I M /, r ^ 'I I 59-19 00-010-01 i -61500-o.50-01 61500-060-01 59.6 0-070-01 f 59-6i500 0-01 + i in a MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Associate P1 anner--Johnson SUBJECT: Special Use Permit Revision-- LOCATION: Nursery Schooh 47 South Century Avenue APPLICANT/OWNER: Lutheran Church of Peace c . DATE : May 11, 1982 SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL Re uest Revise the 1973 special use permit for a nursery school, to increase the number of allowable students at -any one time .from thirty to fort ' y y children. Proposal 1. Two classes of twenty Kindergarten students dents each would be added to the resent Preschool program. The present program consists p . p g n sts of two classes of twenty nursery school children; dren; one taught from 9:15 a.m. t • .from 12:00 .m. 0 11. 45 a.m. and the other p to 3.00 p. m. 2. The Kindergarten classes would be tau ' ght in separate rooms, but at the same time as the nursery school classes, 3. The Kindergarten classes would begin n i n g September 1982, 4. The floor area per child and teacher to student ratios required for the nursery school program would be followed for the Kindergarten classes. (No requirements exist for a private Kindergarten program.) CONCLUSION Ana 1 ys i s ..Expansion of the .preschool program to forty students on the premises at one time, would g not present any nuisance or traffic problems for adjacent acent properties .Sig- nificantly more traffic i � s generated by the church. There is no reason to continue to restrict the number of students permissable, other than provided by the Uniform Life Safe • ty Code. In this case, approximately ninety children, would be the maximumermi • p ssable. The applicant has that. indicated i there are no plans to expand beyond the proposed forty children program. A similar preschoolro ra - p g m was approved by special exception for _ -the Hol Redeemer Church at 2555 Hazelwood Avenue. The permit y P t was approved without reference to a maximum number of students or to the hours of operation, .� The Lutheran Church of Peacer M� peschool permit should be revised to eliminate conditions three and four (maximum number of• students and hours of operation). The special use nature of the permit should alsob • e reduced- to a special exception, for consistency with recent past action. - 1 - a Recommendation Approval of a special exception permit for the operation on of at the h p a , preschool .program Lutheran Church of Peace, 47 South Century Avenue, subject to the ' conditions: J 4 e following f Correction of all Life Safety and Building Code defci enci es , :-pry or to the 1982 47 school year. 20 =If no nuisance conditions exist at the end of three years, the permit may be renewed by the City Counc-i l . Approval is recommended on the basis that: 1. The proposal is consistent s tent with the intent of the Cit • 2. Th r y Code, The proposal will not substantially change or detract from the use of the neighboring or subject property; 3. The proposal is in the best interests of the community and - 4. There h Y public welfare, have not been any nuisances or complaints during theast nine ears of operation, p y - 2 - BACKGROUND Site Des.cri ption Size: Three acres Exis-ti ng Land Use: - Lutheran Church of Peace surrbunding Land Uses North: Retail and office uses East: Century Avenue, Across CenturyAvenue, e, single dwellings Sough: Single dwellings Southwest: Undevelo ed planned P � p d and zoned for single dwellings West: Carver Elementary School Past Actions 4-26-73: Council approved a special use permi t to allow a nursery school at the Lutheran Church of Peace, 47 South Century y Avenue subject u � ect to • . 1. All code deficiencies noted by Village inspectors • to permit g p ctors shall be corrected prior p mt issuance; 2. The occupancy permit may be issued after Set • 3. The _ September 1, 1973, special permit shall authorize a maximum of 30 students; 4 Qualified supervision as required b the State • Y of Minnesota shall 11 be required. red . 5. The special permit shall be limited to day -time ' • y e operation on between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6.00 P.M. on Monday through Friday; 6. A designated and 9 g available abl a recreation outdoor area shall be provided at 'of occu anc the time occupancy permit request; 7. Water service shall be provided in accordance• wi th the regulations of the State of Minnesota and the facility shall connect to publ � c water when at the property line; 8. The applicant shall agree to the above conditions' �n writing. 8-7-80: Council approved a special exception permit preschool P P t to operate a day care center and p of at the Holy Redeemer Church, 2555 Hazelwood A venue, subject to: If no nuisance conditions exist . at the end of one year, the permit may be renewed for five years, thereafter, renewal shall b ' every five years. e subject ect to City approval Approval is based upon the followin findings: ngs. 1 The proposal is consistent with the intent of City Code. The proposal will not substantially chane or de ' Y g tract from the use of the neighboring or subject property. 3. The proposal is in the best interests of the community and the public welfare. - 3 - 9-17'81: Council • l renewed the Holy Redeeme r special exception permit for five Years. DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS Planni n l • ia nd Use _ e Pi an designation: 20 des i 9na ti on' RL, Residential Lower = coni Densi ng : F -Farm ty 3• Complian • Ce with Land Use La - ws : a . Section 903 903.010(j) of Cit Residential District -y bode states that trict is permittedt any -use permit • b. S i n a Farcy, .� ted � n an R. Section 904.010(3)esidential Distri of Cit Cod ct, and private schoolsy e states that "churches, (or other schools cheS, public or • governing body),, may ols by sPeCia] permit parochial, .Y be located in R_ P mit from the lawful 1, Residential Districts, C-• Section g 15.030 of exception CityCode tates that when the governing bo ay cons•an to the Zoning Code, it shall, among other things: ders 1) Assure itself that the proposed Purpose and intent that change is consistent • of the zoning ora with the spi ri t 9 � Hance; 2) Determine that t the proposed chap • injure or detract from change will not substantia ll the use of neighboring lly change, character of the neighborhood 9 boring propert or to the are g , hood and that the y from the a included i n the use of the property . guarded; Proposed change or p y adJacent plan is adequately safe- 3) Determine that the proposed cha • vi l l age, the conve nge w1 1 serve the b . Public convenience of the community est in erests of the welfare, tY (where aPPl i cab 1 e) , and the Public Works City water isnot avai Table Public Safet /Bui 1 dng Official 1. One fire e xt� ngui cher (2A l O g�) ' lower level, s to be installed near the south exit on the Smoke detector 5 f s are to be installed i _ feet from end wall 3 n lower level hallw • _ 0 feet on center, ay, (Si ngle Statin - ) (L.S.9- n - 3. No storage5.3.3.3.2.) is Permitted in the mechanical room. _ 4* Repair sheet 'rock over stairs by the south wall. 5• Pack all en o t P areas aroundes i �- P P With insulation w here pipes pass through walls, -4- (iP ,w 60 Remove temporary 1i ghti n0 from the closet in the west classroom on the lower rlevel. Only perma.nent lighting i 7. s permitted (L,S. 9-5.3.4.1,2).gncy 1� ht� g ngisrequiredinthe lower level hallway. (L.S.9 hallw4a Y.1.3 .L �^. S.8. Protect -5 3.2.1 0. ) in areas where -5there wi11 be children under the age of fiveivrica1 covers are required over a11 outlets OtherA encies 1 • = Department rtm p ent of Public Welfare a• .Operational requirements for nurser 5 years); y school licensing (children fr �2- om 2 to 1) At least 35 square feet per child. (This facility contains 31 feet or room for 90 children.) 50 square 2) A staff to child ratio of no greaterthan1:10. 3) Approval by the local Fire Marshal, b• This facility has remained in compliance with licensing re uir throughout its nine year existence. 4 ements 2. Department of Education There are no licensing requirements for a private Kindergarten. mb Enclosures: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line Ma 3. Applicant' p pp cant s Letter of Request q t t - 5 _ r ■ �'l W y Z 3 M ° J Z � 68 MATCH L I NE .W CONWAY n U AV ISERVIC RD 3 M 3M . R D` • � S 94 12 a 120 - HUDSON_' HUDSON itp I q� PL A cf i A Y IBC tle N, • — -� Creak MAY R • F, Ml A. JAMES �Dk < y J J •t W J UPPER AFTON RD. u W 2 � 1 T28NR22W J 2 4� t LOWER AFTON R o. 39 t lA � z P Np c F- W V 68 (�) 39 (i) (4) MAILAND RD. h (4) i (25) LOCATION MAP > LINE w u �»��u m~.V�VL'D MAP _ t set 47 SOUTH CENTURY AVENUE clhfilm�u 9 RICHARD A. HODGES PASTOR Match 31J. 1282 PHONE 612 / 739-7004 730-7%3 M&,, Je66 Ot4on 1380 F&o4t Avenue St. paut, Ml nnez-ota 5 5109- D ea& Mt. Otton. Thk,6 k.6 a neck u ez t Joh an incn ear, e kn out S ecia p t Uz e Penmi't jot the Lutheran Chuneh aj Peace Pre-Schas . We now have the PetLmtt z e6oA 30. studentz and woutd tike to incneaz e tt to 400 Ij thete i4a need to Ae�,cn4 ect thep&emizez., pteaae feet J&ee to contact me at. 732-709-4 6 • between 9_. 00. and 2:00. CLJpme S:ncenet y, 49 Chhid LUfi Dihecton LUTHERAN CHURCH OF PEACE PRS -SCHOOL APR 1 1982 f4v2 . LAI rCt 1111L Kevision: 47 S. Century (Lutheran Church of Peace) €. Secretary Olson said the applicant is re u"est�n a revision 1973 special use permit for q 9 to the a nursery school, to increase the num allowable students frnumber of from thirty to forty children' . Staff approval as outlined in their report ' s recommending � . Theapplicant was r rep present at the meets ng, i ndi cated staff included all information in their had ort. Commissioner Barrett moved the P Cit C ._ 1 anni n Commss recommend ,y� ounce 1 approval of a s ec al exc � to the at- res choo l P e t i on permit for the o e ra d o ..�...�? _ _ _ program at the Lutheran - p..� n of b `ectfollowinqChurch of Peace, 47 S. Centur W to the condition ons : v Avenue , 1-I Correction of. all Life Safety and Buildin the 1982 school year, 9 Code deficiencies, prior to . 2. .If no nuisance conditions exist at the end of three years the ' may be renewed by the City Counci 1. permz t Approval is recommended'on on the basis • _ s that. 1. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the City Code 2. The proposal wi 11 not s ubs to ntially change or detract from the u neighboring or subject property se of the 3. The proposal is in the , best interests - ests of the community andubl i c welfare P e 4. .There have not been any nuisance • s or complaints nts dura ng the past nine years of operation, Commissioner Pel l i sh seconded Barrett E l l e f Ayes - Commissioners Axda hl son, Fischer, Heb ny, Howard, Ki s he 1: P ' el l ish, S1etten, Whitcomb i May 7, 1982 MEMORANDUM 'To: Director of Community Devnt Geoff Olson M.- From: Fire Marshal A. C. Schadtelo - Suksjec t: Proposed Greenwood Residence - Larpenteur Avenue and Jackson Street • for the proposed Greenwood residence, the Having reviewed the site plan o p p following items must be included to comply with the Fire Codes: 1. Complete automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with N.F.P.A., Number 13, Installation. 2. Emergency standby lighting. 3. Smoke detectors with automatic fire alarm system, including exi tway manual pull stations* 4. One all-purpose 10-1 b.� all - ur ose fire extinguisher, recessed -wall mounted., for every 3,500 square feet of coverage. 5. Exit signing and illumination to be provided. The above items installed will render the structure in compliance with the City Fire Codes. i nal construction plan review to be evaluated by this office prior to F P issuance of building permit. It is m understanding the developers are planning to include the above items y 9 in construction. The above for your information* ACS: js MAY 1 C 1982 i May 13, 1982 MEMORANDUM r tir ' Director of Community Development Geoff Olson To :. D� re - From': Fire Marshal A. Comm. . Schadt != Initial Report for Proposed Greenwood Residence - Larpen- Subj ect : Follow -Up of I p teur and Jackson as to Fire There has been some question raisedDepartment access to the proposed structure for firefighting purposes . he department from the I have discussed this matter with the Chief of Parkside t p h me that the site: plan as submitted would provide area, and he concurs wit adequate access for firefighting purposes if necessary. ss variance when proper built-in Please be advised the Fire Code allows access fire protectior systems are installed; and, to my knowl.edge, this s to be •ncluded i n the budding design as was submitted to you in a previious memorandum. � Again, be advised this office • will evaluate final construction plans to insure c� that adequate Fire and Life Safety Code requirements are met* The above for your information. ACS: js MEMORANDUM • City Manager TO: s FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Three Variances LOCATION: P — Lar enteur Avenue and Jackson Street (Northwest corner APPLICANT/OWNER: REM Development, Inc. PROJECT: Greenwood Residence DATE: June 4, 1982 INTRODUCTION Request Approval of the following variances: 1. A variance from the required number of parking spaces (21 are proposed, 36 are required). 20 A variance for exemption from the garage requirement. 3. A floor area variance to provide rooms with less floor area than Code requires. (Code requires 880 square feet for atwo-bedroom apartment. The applicant is proposing 180 square foot units, with common, kitchen and living areas.) Proposed Land Use Refer to the enclosed narrative and site plan. CONCLUSION Analysis 1. Number of Parking Spaces • should be adequate., The 21 parking spaces provided shou since the residents do not need i n this case is to provide enough spaces for employee drive, The parking .. stalls visitor parking and the applicant's cants vans . If the 21 parking parking, insufficient, • • e the parking lot to nine are found to be insufficient, the applicant could restri p p 9 additional spaces* wide spaces* This would provide three and 8 1/2 foot P � -Council took similar action when they granted a parking variance ce for Pizza "'Time Theatre at the Maplewood East Shopping Center. 2. Ga ra e s There is no need for any garages. The residents •ts do not drive=:—and there is no reason for employees to have garages. 3. Floor Area • his percentage seems very high, area variance amounts to 80 percent. T p 9 The floor since they will be bedrooms he size of the rooms s not too critical., but: tuse of a cor�non area, consisting of only.The residents will also have the a living room, lounge and bathroom. Recommendation Approval of the following a variances, , b sedon the reasons given above: ' to the condition that the parking parking variance of fifteen spaces, subject 1' A p g 2 foot wide spaces upon determination lot shall be restri ped with nine and 8 1 / by the City that a parking problem exists. parking variance waiving 2. A p 9 ng the requirement for garages. 3. A .floor area variance nce for 180 square -foot bedrooms 2 BACKGROUND Site Description 1. Site size: 1.58 acres 2. Existing land use: undeveloped Surroundin Land Uses 17 Northerly:Single 1 e dwellings Southerly-* Larpenteur Avenue and single dwellings s dwellings Eagerly: Jackson Street and s� ngle • Unconstructed Beaumont Street and single dwellings Westerly: Past Action 12-28-67: Council • approved the vacation of the north -south alley on the subject property. 1-3-80: Council approved three variances for the Concordia Arms senior citizen building: 1 The9 arage requirement was waived. • parking spaces instead of the required 2.05. How - 2. `The project could have 103 pa g p rki n problem would develop within the first year, the pa g • .ever, � f a parking p anded. The applicant provided a letter of credit for have to be ex lot would P this parking lot expansion. • bedroom units which measured 3. A floor area variance was granted for one o 624 square feet .each. This was a variance of 24 square feet or 4% of the required floor area of 587 square feet. • Plan amendment from RL, Residential Lower Density to 5-6-82; Council approved a .P ., • • and a special use permit subject to the following Rh, Residential Higher Density p conditions: 1. Approval of a Plan change for the site from R1 to Rh. 2. After the first year of operation, the Council may renew or revise the special use permit. d prior or to the issuance of a building permit. 3. Beaumont Street shall be vacate p • substantial screening of the property along the 4, The applicant shall stress s • to the d westerly lot lines as a buffer. This will be subject northerly an y • , approval of the Community Design Review Board. • variances to et a report from the Fire Marshal on Council tabled the three va � 9 . compliance with fire codes. That report is enclosed. - aft i 3 DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Planning 1. Land Use Plan designation: RL 2. According to the Comprehensive Plan Update, the Rh classification is designated for such housing types as apartments, two-family homes, townhouses, nursing =homes, dormatori es or elderly housing. r 3. ;`_Zoning: R-3, multiple dwellings VARIANCES ONE AND TWO 4. Section 905.030 (1) requires that there be two parking stalls provided for each dwelling unit, one-half of which shall be enclosed in a garage or car port. 5Synceighteen ' e there are dwelling units proposed, 36 parking stalls are required, . with 18 of them being garage spaces. Twenty-one spaces are proposed without any garages, requiring a variance of fifteen spaces and eighteen garages. VARIANCE THREE 6. Section 906.210 (b) requires a minimum floor area of 880 square feet for each two bedroom unit. square feet for each unit is proposed, with the rest in common facilities, 7. 180 q requiring a. variance of 700 square feet for each unit. STATUTORY 8. Section 462.356 subdivision 6 (2) of the Minnesota State Statutes requires that the following findings be made before a variance can be granted: a. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances ' unique to the individual Property under consideration. b. The variance would be in keeping. with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Public Works 1, Sanitary sewer and water are available in Jackson Street, but there maybe some construction difficulties to make a water connection. The water con- ' merits further investigation ation by the developer's engineer to determine nect�on 9 costs, -The drainage tan shows a three acre-foot pond on this property. The topo- 9 P ' h i ma shows the shape and size of the existing low area.,- This capacity �grap c p P must be maintained. Public Safet The residents should be su ervised at all times, when outside the building, because of the high traffic volume on Larpenteur and Jackson. 4 Communi,q Service Refer to the enclosed narrative of the Greenwood Residences. Citizen Input ad ' scent property owners.. only three Staff conducted a telephone survey of the 3 p p _ . persons sons were reached and had the following comments • of facility. i t . It would --be potentially 10 r The traffic i s too heavy for this type Y dangerous for the residents* 2. This type of facility is inappropriate to be located next to single dwellings and a day -.care home. it E ncl osures : 1. Location Map 2. Topographic Map 3, Site Plan 4. Narrative Material 5. Letter f rom Robert Rus sek 6. Letter f rom Mayor Latimer 7, Memo f rom F i re Marshal 9 1.40 LITTLE CANADA f ,l, b 1. M V L i �O v CO. RD ajL TOPOGRAPH I'l MAP `�` - � � ,r � � �•�tr.+tea � �— � � ` ^` _ ' ` ! `? / � ,• • `►�'r"�— :. `r►.. �i�w�' t� ! { � • • t • � r � � �I • i f • 71 T-1 0001* � , • / � -�' •fir. , '� • \ � • • ,• � .,,a„ti,u... / � � 1 13 Ir v . • ►_`_ _ _ -a* • NISo IT IC GREENWOOD RESIDEYCE ' t --''r—fib 'Gl �•� %� ft Ov • G '! 0 MAIN FLOOR EL 182.1 j f �'-� .. % { 9 ! LOWER Fi00RAL 470.1 01 , �' - / �� _ "_ . 1_ = ��`_ �� ' /"..� _ ii .tom '. ` A - sy �i l• Fjr Ord T.1 _ _ - �� _— r � tom•► -�.r... .�1..~ -1 i w • '� � _ , ter~ mss• _ ♦ _ r ...._ -.wr 7r!• ___ — -• Jr.r — -- - JS•.T. -•- as ftac • A — - � - _ _ LARPENTEUR AVENUE 1 Z � 1 i I SITE PLAN GREENWOOD RESIDENCES ' f � � � /' i� '� / _�_ � r� mow- f • • �1 •� � -' low - -, i - / l �� .e" �aw�• O� _ • •j1 • .�. T+ rw 40 `�` - � � ,r � � �•�tr.+tea � �— � � ` ^` _ ' ` ! `? / � ,• • `►�'r"�— :. `r►.. �i�w�' t� ! { � • • t • � r � � �I • i f • 71 T-1 0001* � , • / � -�' •fir. , '� • \ � • • ,• � .,,a„ti,u... / � � 1 13 Ir v . • ►_`_ _ _ -a* • NISo IT IC GREENWOOD RESIDEYCE ' t --''r—fib 'Gl �•� %� ft Ov • G '! 0 MAIN FLOOR EL 182.1 j f �'-� .. % { 9 ! LOWER Fi00RAL 470.1 01 , �' - / �� _ "_ . 1_ = ��`_ �� ' /"..� _ ii .tom '. ` A - sy �i l• Fjr Ord T.1 _ _ - �� _— r � tom•► -�.r... .�1..~ -1 i w • '� � _ , ter~ mss• _ ♦ _ r ...._ -.wr 7r!• ___ — -• Jr.r — -- - JS•.T. -•- as ftac • A — - � - _ _ LARPENTEUR AVENUE 1 Z � 1 i I SITE PLAN GREENWOOD RESIDENCES i i G R E E N W 0 0 D- t RESYDENCES . t PHILOSOPHY PURPOSE - . Pr�OC+�N: O4RGAt:IZATION N94 FACILITY (NEED.USEntSTAFF) f BY I . B C HOlIES r- %o0 i :.f r - s w V . 1 B do C HOMES,, INC. PHILOSOPHY Greenwood Residences administration and staff believe that every , .individual has human value and should be a f f orded. equal dignit..y, respect ual and= the. opportu y nit to pursue happiness. We believe that everyone is capable to growth and has the right to an environment that is as close to le our oal is to help each of our residents reach the normal as possib 8 d vocational function- lmu�a of his/her physical, socfal, intellectual an maxi will pro • ing. The environment and structure of Greenwood Residences , p • alternative within the Minnesota comprehensive residential programs vide one altern for mentally retarded ded adults. Greenwood Residences '09 with its coxrumunity accessibilit • y Will bee p ver art of a viable solution in. combination with �' for mentally alternatives for providing myriad living situations y other . retarded _adults. i - persons that will be located We .provide residential facilities for _disabled _ of co►rmmunit life and will be accessible to public trans - within the mainstreamY other co=nunit resources. n education religious, recreational and oth y Im portatio � ��, individuals who are compatible in terms A 1 wing unit will 11 consist of _ will functioning level. The living unit, bedrooms, and lounges of age and fun g comfortable cheerful, practical and aesthetically pleasing. be furnished to be � - Residents rooms and to help have the opportunity to decorate their P in decor sting 811 the common livingareas. Each resident will be afforded privacy by having at most one r cmocmate and access to . all areas of the facility, and quiet, private areas awayfrom group involvement. We will encourage an atmos- and "ownership" in the unit. Each resident, as a member phere of belonging P of the unit will be involved in all household responsibilities. We believe � ere of ownership fosters increased growth and independence. this at mosph - is integral Careful selection of group compositionin providing meaningful g _ des the with ears and ata f f . A unit of I residents provides relationships wi p opportunity for close, meaningful ful relationships to be developed. Residents - dual difference and uniqueness to provide stimulation need enough indivi es to prom good peer relationships. We want each but enough coa�munalitip 8 • � of the group, but the foremost consideration f s indi- ind�vidual to be part 8 Ps each individual has _ vidualit or .good concept of self. We believe that y - special needs that can best be helped by association with others who can complement these needs* training will be provided on an individual need basis. We Supervision and tr 8 believe that the development of skills and behaviors is essential to increasing the individual's s ability to control his/her environment. Step- • n such areas as hygiene; grooming, dietary needs, house - by -step training i • co ri unit resources , Corrmaunications, interpersonal hold- �,aintenance, use of Y tions at each step increases the individual's knowledge` and, therefore, tela , his/her ability to choose alternatives. • involved in all decisions comerning his/ Each resident has the right to be ' n of goals her welfare. Re/she has the right to be involved in the planning g p and programs and their implementation and evaluation. We are advocates for the client, "support all his/her human and civil rights , and will provide an encourages maximum growth and independence. atmosphere which $ - 1 t • 1 _! PROGRAM IMPUZ.Z.- MENTATION team will develop an individualized program An interdisciplinary t P len for each resident which will be designed to meet the residents . P priority ne. - P eds�. b instructors who have two to four program plans are carried out y _ and/or experience with mentally retarded pers-ons an Years of college % p . ularl in workshops and inservice training to increase who .participate ;re y enc in teaching appropriate skills. their proficiency - Methods of implementation are chosen to best fit the task, skill, or beha -vior being taught and the p y - ersonalit of the resident learning the . the techniques skull . Some of that may be used are: 1. behavior modification positive reinforcement, time out from positive token economies etc. Any aversive or deprivation reinforcement, 'n relations co�cmittee prior to procedure will be reviewed by a hums initiation. Z. reflective and/or active listening 30 role playing 4. reality therapy . validation therapy -- reality orientation 5. peer reinforcement . 6. developmental sequenced learning Y z. task analysis (content and/or process) B. analysis of individual strengths and weaknesses 9. relaxation therapy 10. problem -solving techniques Y An individual resident may have program(s) utilizing more than one • n method at an one time and/or methods may change as a lmp3ementatio Y _ through a hierarchy of needs. resident progresses 8 _ li zed program plans and sof the Continuous evaluation of individua P S .resident's progress, skills, and needs will be carried out by program staff - r) Sufficient staff ratios Will be ma intained to provide 24-hour supervision of each resident. B & c HOMES, INC* • . Greenwood Re s f!� dence seek to provide e ' comf ortable, attractive, residential setting community-based reside 8 where multi -handicapped mentally retarded adults may live with compatible pears. Residents mill come ' ' promote continued meaningful involvement prAmari�� from the nearby area to prom . _ r with family and friends. table livin setting, behavioral, developmental, In addition to a comfor S l be provided to enhance the residents' ability and medical services wil to live as independently as possible. Highly qualified residentf al staff ole models will serve as appropriate r s fostering an attitude and atmosphere self -res act wh8 ich promotes each resident's self-respect,, indepencence and growth* ed for each resident to will be develo Individualized programs P teach and reinforce independent skills in any of the following areas: Be and oral hygiene personal a yS k. dressing skills fine and .toss motor skills 1 g b money management y • me dining skills and etiquette c, transportation n. laundry skills and .personal d, e. room and facility care ter ersonal relationships in P clothing maintenance f, marketing and cost comparison telephone o. mobility training po respect for person and property ge of communication and use p q. self image h. treat safety - s . y _, coping skills i . recreation . j., use of medications if specials -zed training in these or .other areas is needed by 8 resident, it ` will be provided by facility staff or corr�nunit Y consultants. Lack of training b Greenwood staff in a particular skill area will not be considered fres g y sufficient reason to omit that area from a program plan. educational Corrimunity-based medical, dental, s vocational, recreational, i and religious services will be used whenever possible to promote the most a style available for each resident. normal life le y _ =s a ADMISSION POLICY will give equal consideration to individuals Greenwood Res idence � wi to the fact that thout reand to race, creed, or national origin. Due . aced residents of the same sex as the proposed room- , resident rooms are sh , dered exce 'les who wish to mate will be consi t in the case of married cou P share a roome nit based developmental behavior and - A�ility to benefit from a comrnu y ram will be the rime factor in consideration for .medical oriented program P a drni s gi. on. defined in Rule 34 and Rule 80 of the Minnesota Multihandicapped adults as the following . Public Welfare will be considered eligible if Department of criteria are met. A. Primary diagnosis of mental retardationo e on admission. Waivers must be obtained from th B. Age 18 or older up _ .'Department of Public Welfare if outside these' limits. . CIndividuals • who mentally and/or physically incapable of self , • Y preservation are given first priority. 4h • th limitations such as cerebral palsy, sight impairments, D. Individuals wi • dama a an other physical limitation such as fine epilepsy, brain g Y . ' on or behavior problems (mild, controllable are and gross motor coordination, are also eli ible eligible. Persons with hearing or speech impairment .g • • impairment is in conjunction with another disability. if hearing or speech p E. Individuals must have potential otential to benefit from -the program of n of the following Greenwood Residence Inc., and need training in any _ ureas: 1. developmental skills 2 self-help skills 30 coTllltunity orientation 4. social skills 5. behavior management f the following areas:. and/or require consulting services in any o 1. physical therapy 2. occupational * therapy 3. speech pathology 4. audiology 5. psychological counseling 6. medical (Preference will be given to persons needing occupational therapy and/or physical therapy to maintain or improve mobility and independance) F. Availability participation and artici ation in an on-going suitable day program. G. Mutual acceptance of a contract between client and the agency as to programs and goals. • the following conditions will not be considered: Applicants with 8 • who have a history of and/or have a current self - 1. Individuals w injurious behavior resulting in severe tissue damage, or a =_ severe antisocial or destructive behavior* 2. Individuals who have a history of and/or currently considered physically agressive toward clients/staff to the extent that severe tissue damage may result. Persons who are so severely hearing impaired as to need manual 3. Y = _ - communication will not be considered eligible - 4 Persons with a disabilit onset at an age later than during — Z" Y ,.developmental period will not be considered eligible. admissions are considered probationary for the first six months. X11 P Y r • P • i .i •i Y �-� /V/tL • ' • B & C HOMES, INC* • . imp.. PROPOSED NEED, USE, STAFF, AND TRAFFIC EXPECTED AT NEW FACILITY may- • ..w�• • Z..A • •••j�J- .-.. ��. The need to builda new facility lit arises from the growing -waiting list of prospective ective residents who desire to be placed in one I of the two existing ood Residences Hamel Greenwood East and Greenwood West. Should �Greenw , y s facility be built in Maplewood it would be called Greenwood hlorth. this y P Pry Presently it is planned to be a 36 -bed home for mentally retarded and physically handicapped young adults who meet the criteria attached. The building will be divided into -three units of 12 beds each and subdivided into groups of six for greater. staff effectiveness while maintaining- a i g p p home like atmosphere. The, staff -resident ratio will :be close to 1; considering derin the three shifts daily. The established number of employees including d n non -direct care staff will be approximately 48 at .Greenwood N North with the greatest number working during the 6:00 to 9:30 AM shift and during the 3:00 to 11:00 PM shift. At these times the maximum s g number of employees should total approximately 20.0 - There will be P ample provision for off the street parking with access P on Jackson Street. Greenwood North will have 3 vans for transporting . ed to and from con unity services. ted its handicapped The residents are obliga to attend school or workshops on a daily basis.* Present plans call for 3 approximately 8:30 AM and return around 3:30 P.M. about 1/ of them to leave P via busses or vans which will load off street on the drive through drive- way. The other 2/3 of the residents will be provided an in-house day program in the lower level of the building, Building this facility in Maplewood should be to the advantage of the c otrununi ty. Besides increasing tax revenues it should leave considerable retail trade in the area. Employment opportunities will be available as well as utilization of community churches, volunteer groups, recreat- • onal activities etc. There should be no great need for increased . security or concern for the surrounding area since residents are supervised around the clock and are constantly evaluated during their habilitation programs All operation I of the facility will be strictly regulated under p Rules 34 and 80 of the Minnesota State Department of Welfare. TO B & C HOMES, INC. ORGANIZATION in Au st 1978 specifically to take B do C Homes, Inc. was formed 8u , over the operation of existing xisti residential facilities for the develop- sidence Inc. This disabled young adults known as Greenwood R e , mentally y rented space in Prospect Park to corporation was organized in 1976 and _ P'a` _ a handicapped and mentally retarded individ pause and serve 30 physicallypresent lora-- st 1 77 the residents were moved to their pr uals. In Augu , 9 tions at Greenwood West, 6019 West 39th St. , St. Louis park and Green- wood East g 1609 Jackson St. St. Paule ration formed and controlled, B & C Homes, Inc. is a Minnesota corporation men Norman Bollinger and Clyde Chisholm together . by two local business , Directors* The. Bollingers with. their wives which make up the Board of D x live in Anoka while the Chisholms reside in Golden Palley. . f PROPOSED EXPANSION PLANS tion of the Greenwood properties, B do C Soon after the aquisi were faced With the need to build a new facility.The Homes, Inc. e i list f�com families that granted to reasons being a grow waiting inadequate structures ca d into Greenwood and the admit their handicapped a or individuals• dealing with heavy care, non-ambul t y for de ng ed t o plan and construct were a - • The services of REM, Inc. ngag Ramsey County to meet our needs. 8 do a .modern Class B facility in R Y and se this new property to carry out the programs C Homes will lea, blic Welfare for as many new services ces of the State Department of Pu residents as will be apprOVed• ACKERMANN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTS 35 WEST WATER STREET ROBERT F. ACKERMANN ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55107 HAROLD O. HANSEN THOMAS R.. ANDERSON TELEPHONE 612-221-9700 ROBERT C. RUSSEK May 10 , 1982 Geoff Olson, AICD -_ "Director of Community Development 1902 East County Road B :7MaP lewood, Minnesota 55109 Geof f 0 he Comprehensive e were ha to .receive approval of t W PPY ecial Use Permit for the Greenwood Plan Amendment and S p ted at the Residence Project. As you know, these were gran Maplewood City Council meeting of May 6, 1982. ' several questions raised There were, at that same meeting, .� have applied ro.ect and variances my clients ha pp concerning our p 1 for. This letter responds to two of these questions . Hopefully, efull it will clarify our proposal. s ted for floor areas that are less A variance has been requested problem those required by the cod .than th code. we feel that this p q . mis-understanding of the nature of our - was caused by a into three residential ' ect . The building has been organized prod e living, dining, kitchen wings. Within each of these wings ar Other dining bathroom facilities in addition and ba to bedrooms. the riain Floor. and activity spaces are also located - b e dr o om apartment trn.ent (a rule of thumb .Assuming. 2� people per two P 6 erson Maplewood Planning Department) -p .specified by the Map t) our 3 building is the equivalent of 14.4 apartments. Total floor g 4 .200 .area of the Main Floor is 1 square feet or 986 square feet feet per apartment. . This exceeds the city requirement of 880 square feet per two-bedroom apartment* • ed a question .about fire safety. The. City Council also rats 4, ire • meeting o f May 6 the city o f Maplewood F Since the meet � Y n a .hone conversation Marshall has reviewed our Site Plan. I P h hin that our project would include a today I verified with sprinkler system, smoke detectors, an alarm system and emergencyency state and city codes. lighting in compliance with all appicable lig g The Fire Marshall, Mr. Schadt , indicated that he had no Site Plan. He has sent a report to the problem with our Si approval. We Maplewood Planning Department indicating his • app Map 1 g hall in the future will be lad to work with the Fire Mars �. g of e . bui 1 din . to ensure that we have a s g I V � • clarified .our position on these that this letter has cla of � hope responding to the issue matters . ray clients will be P We Took • parking s aces and the need for garages . required Pa g . P our Cit Council= and rd to receiving approval fturn.y y You forward ro ect. Please call- if to succeS s fully completing our p 4. ave any questions* - incerely, , Robert C. Russek Ackermann & Assoc. Architects CITY d F SAINT PAUL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR � ttt111'111tt� � �• " 347 CITY HALL SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 GEORGE LATIMER (612) 29.8-4323 MAYOR May 4, 19 82 Maplewood City Council Attn : Jeff Olson Maplewood City Hall 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Gentlemen: We have received notification of a Comprehensive Plan change, code. variances p nce and special al use permit for construction of a 36 bed housing facility at La�^penteur Avenue and Jackson. The City of St. Paul does not object to these actions but would like to request that a eful attention i s given to two items in the completion of careful 9 development plans for the site: 1. The increased density will result in increased stormwater run-off entering the St. Paul sewer system and increasing flow to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Treatment Plant. Development plans should include facilities for retention of stormwater on the site. 2. Primary automobile access should be off of Jackson to avoid increasing congestion at the intersection of Beaumont and Larpenteur. Thank you for the notification and opportunity to comment. Sincerely, ke a imer CSL.: s b GC: Daniel Dunford a i I MAY 1982 Approval of the preliminary plat, subject to complying with the following conditions before final plat approval: 1. Remedial soils measures, based upon soil boring data and analysis, shall be submitted to the City Building Official for approval. These measures must insure that the lots proposed in areas with unstable soils can meet building code requirements, 2. Council awarding a construction contract for the extension of sanitary _ to or r y sewer to the s i approval of the Metropolitan tan Waste Control Commission for use of their sewer in Arcade Street. 3. Final grading, drainage, nage, and utility 1 i ty plans must be approved b the Ci t En ineer PP y -y g . These plans shall include, but not be 1 limited ted to, the provision for all drainage to be directed to the interior of the plat a . p and corrected contour lines nes that accurately reflect existing and proposed topography. 4. The City of Little Canada ordering the extension of water to the site. 5. A signed developer's agreement, with the required surety, is submitted to q y� i the City Engineer for public improvements, including temporary a tem orar cul-de- sac for proposed Beam Avenue. :r 6: Dedication of drainage easements to RamseyCount for y County Ditch No. 7. 7. Submission of an erosion control plan, before building erts are issued P ' which considers the recommendations of the Soil Conservation Service. no 1 - MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat LOCATION: 2830 Keller Parkway .APPLICANT: Richard J . Anderson OWNERS: Richard J. Anderson and Frank Frattal one PROJECT: Gervais overlook -_ DATE: May 12, 1982 r SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL Approval of a preliminary plat for twelve detached single -dwelling homes CONCLUSION Ana�i ss This plat has been revised, Including a reduction of eight lots. is, from the previously denied twenty -lot p.l at to meet the concerns of the City 'Counci 1. The plat meets all code requirements and is substantially less than the allowed density. Recommendation Approval of the preliminary plat, subject to complying with the following conditions before final plat approval: 1. Remedial soils measures, based upon soil boring data and analysis, shall be submitted to the City Building Official for approval. These measures must insure that the lots proposed in areas with unstable soils can meet building code requirements, 2. Council awarding a construction contract for the extension of sanitary _ to or r y sewer to the s i approval of the Metropolitan tan Waste Control Commission for use of their sewer in Arcade Street. 3. Final grading, drainage, nage, and utility 1 i ty plans must be approved b the Ci t En ineer PP y -y g . These plans shall include, but not be 1 limited ted to, the provision for all drainage to be directed to the interior of the plat a . p and corrected contour lines nes that accurately reflect existing and proposed topography. 4. The City of Little Canada ordering the extension of water to the site. 5. A signed developer's agreement, with the required surety, is submitted to q y� i the City Engineer for public improvements, including temporary a tem orar cul-de- sac for proposed Beam Avenue. :r 6: Dedication of drainage easements to RamseyCount for y County Ditch No. 7. 7. Submission of an erosion control plan, before building erts are issued P ' which considers the recommendations of the Soil Conservation Service. no 1 - 8. Payment of.def erred water assessments . 9. Omit outlot A and include this land in lots 5 and 6, Block 2. Provide a drainage easement over this area for the pond and outlet. the size Sipe; and location to be approved by the City Engineer. BACKGROUND Site Description 1. Gross acreage: 8.6 2. Net acreage: 7.2 y 3� Existing land use: single -dwelling home - 4: The site consists of six platted lots. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: single dwelling homes on larger lots in Little Canada. This land is zoned and planned for single=dwelling residential. Easterly: a fourteen acre landlocked, undeveloped parcel. Southerly: undeveloped rear portions of a large, irregularly shaped single-family lots fronting on Keller Parkway and the proposed Ramsey County Ditch seven pond area. Westerly: three single-family lots, two of which are developed, and Arcade Street. Across Arcade .Street are single -dwelling homes and Gervais Lake, all in Little Canada. Past Actions December 1, 1980: The Planning Commission considered a lot division proposal which would have created three . parcels without frontage to a dedicated and maintained public street. Denial was recommended on the basis that: 1. There appear to be other options available for better development of this area. 2. The proposal is not consistent with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. 3. Once the driveway would be developed, it would be difficult to upgrade it to'a City street with City sewer and water and assess this upgrading. 4. A hardship has not been demonstrated to exist which is unique to -this property. The applicant withdrew the proposal prior to City Council consideration. 4--15-82: Council denied a preliminary plat with twenty lots on the basis that: 1.. A drainage -plan was not provided that resolved drainage' problems in the area. 2. The Council was not satisfied that soil problems could be dbrrected for suitable building sites. Council did not know the extent of the unstable soil that would be required for meeting building code requirements. _3 3. The plat does not necessarily meet the character of the neighborhood g od or the size of the lots. Council also referred this matter to the Planning Commission to. consider a twel ve-lot pl at.;or an RE -20 district that would encompass the area south of the boundaryp ��- between the two cities, east of Arcade, and north of Keller TParkway; or as a third alternative, the three -lot division r ' osed i n p � 1980 . .-Council Counci1 also denied the three -lot division. - DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS Planning 1. Land Use Plan deisgnation: RL, Residential Lower Density 2. Zoning: R-19 Residence Districtsin 1 e dwelling) i n � 9 9) 3. Proposed density: 6.8 persons/net acre 4. Permitted density: 14 persons/net acre 5. Compliance with Land Use Laws: a. Section 1006 (c) of the Platting Code states that: "Before any preliminary plan is approved by the City Council under this chapter, the information furnished with said plan must show conclusively that the area proposed to be subdivided is drainable and that the land is of such nature as to make its intended use practical and feasible. If these features are not apparent, the e owner shall be required to enter into an agreementuaranteei n that all adverse g g conditions will 1 be corrected and that drat nage will be accomplished in a satisfactory manner. The final decision i ' n this matter shall be made by the City Council acting upon the advice and recommendation of its engineer and other authorized representative." b. The plat is consistent with the DNR shorel and development guidelines adopted by the Council on October 15, 1981. c. The plat is consistent with City Platting requirements. Public Works 1. A Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) sanitary sewer is adjacent to the site. A permit from the MWCC would be required to use this sewer. .r If a permit can not be obtained, sewer would have to be extended from Kohlman Lane and Keller Parkway. - 2. Water is not adjacent to the site and would have to be emended from Little Canada. - 4 - 3. Outl of A should be omitted and combined with lots 5 and 6, block 2. An easement for the pond should be provided. This wi 11 avoid the City havi :ng response b►i 1 i ty for maintenance of the outl ot. 4. The existing contours are inaccurate• and should be revs sect � n preparing a drainage plan. The drainage tan would n g plat, at, p of require any changes to the 35. Stora drainage facilities must • = be provided with the plat. Theand on i this s.i to will serve a dual function: P a. storm water control for the1 p at, and b. sedimentation control for Ditch County - Di - seven storm water, prior to discharge to the proposed RamseyCount 0 the soothe Y pen Space land located to southeast of the plat. -These improvements would prevent flooding and protect. water quality. (See Other Agencies --Ramsey County Public Works for County Ditch seven information.) 5. Soil borings and analyi s will identify remedi al measures for building sites, This i ncl u_des such items as high water table ori • insufficient bearing capacity, 7. According to the City's Transportation p on P1 an, Keller Parkway � • s adequate ,for the current traffic. The proposed plat will have little i mpact on thetraffic situation, Financial A deferred water assessment (Project #75-1 • t 6 � must be paid pry or o the rova of the f i nal plat, pP l Other Agencies I. The Soil Conservation Service: For on-site erosion control, the following procedures are recommended: a. Grading be done during the dry season. b. A filter blanket and sediment dike• onsite wetland, be established adjacent to the C. The existing wetland to the southeast should -- sho u 1 d be cut o f f from Ge rva � sLake 1andlocking site drainageSome form of temporary basin may need to be constructed to temporarily detain s r Y site waters, d. Grading of the knoll at the site's east side should pro ress from we _. 9 west to east to maintain a vegetative str� p between the on.�i te. wetland and the grading at all times, e. If fill is to be removed from the site installed � , a gravel roadway .should be to minimize transportation of soils onto roadways. - 5 - f. All .exposed soils • should be stabilized as soon ' measures, as possible by vegetative 2. Ramsey -Washington Metro Watershed District: a�. A District permit for. . development of the plat 1 s required, equlred. b. Relative to Gervais Lake..110 A. , the storm water hold i n capacity drainage pond required on this .9 plc ty of the • s site is insignificant. _ The =r - basin's function should be asa sedimentation basin: 3. Ramsey County Public Works: a. Considerable work is beingdo • runoff en done to minimize m� ze the impacts of storm Leri ng the Kohlman-Gervais-Kel water is extremelyl er-Phalen chap n of lakes. I important the developer cons i d t increase the rate of er designs which do not runoff and nutrient loadin from 9 the given area. b- Improvements to Count ' y Ditch seven are proposed for the The project will consist of � summer of 1982, p Ping storm water south along the west side of Arcade Street then to a sedimenta - tion pond on the applicant's site prior to discharge to the wetland to the South of the plat. (Map Four) An overflow for direct discharge to Gervais provided to protect thea applicant�Lake would be of a lar Pp cant s site from flooding in the event - ge storm. 4. Ramsey County Open Space: Ramsey County will initiate condemnation proceedings in the near future for the wetland area to the southeast of the lat. jurisdiction of this area must be gained before the County(Map our) DitchCounty seven project can proceed. Citizen Comments Of thirteen Property p y ow ners surveyed, eight responded. Sanford Brink, the abutting p ,Seven are opposed. applicant 9 Property owner to the north, requested that pP redesign the plat to align ro q , a t the Canada/Ma 1 ewood proposed Beam Avenue with the Little e Canada/Maplewood boundary. Little Canada was no • Canada's response letter notified � ed of this request. Little e • to Mr. Brink, (letter enclosed w • to pursue the issue he )� as that �f he wished T would have to pay the cost of the • To date, Mr. Brink has not contacted necessary studies, stud(s),cted L�ttla Canada to initiate the re 'y required Comments from the eightersons following P opposed to the development brought ng issues: g t up the :l. The unsuitability of a wetland for devel o ment. r2. Erosion and runoff . from the property, pollut�n g the wetlands and the lake. 3. Affects on an existing sti n high sites 9 g water table i n the area , wi tt� re and ani tary face 1 i ti es. �. 9 to on. Affect on the existingKeller er Parkway tra�ffi c problems, off 01E 5. The effect of eliminating the wetland on the • chain of lakesi n ter storm water enters. ng the ms of flooding and cost of storm water through the St. Paul system. treatment 6• Whether the deWill. ve 1 development cause a need for • to be paid for b adjacent stoma sewers � n the area, y nt property owners, The affect on neighborhood = g borhood character, of twenty lots smaller than the Present. norm. mb Enclosures 1. Location Map 2. Property Line Map 3. Preliminary Plat Ma P 4, County Ditch Seven DDrainage and 0 5. ExcerptPen Space from the Maplewood Drainage Plan 6. SCS Soils Map.g 7. Letter from Little Canada t • o Sanford 6r�nk, 12-17-81 Y 3 �l is VADNAIS HEIGHTS 61 i -- r EAU 60 AVE. 0 a 22 � d ! Koh Imon� . Gervoi L u k a ,...--•......` L o /E c _' .� o ` KOHL WAN AVE 40 ROAD UjW J d o o W = v }" V W Z 22 c 61 �- 60 j �,: ..... GER VAIs AVE. _ 36 ;•.ter, .�..... - Kelley _ ' � COPE { MAP 1 LOCATION MAP - V�J +ec ROTO LELAN 25 JUM T10 i AVE. Z U RKE F: ♦ �T �' ELDRIDG 1 hN> if Lr t0 t s t _ KILL MA � H .:� — a[ MAP 4 COUNTY DITCH SEVEN*DRAINAGE AND OPEN SPACE PROPOSAL • DRAINAGE PLAN KOH, L MAN LAKE MAJOR .WATERSHED DIVIDE •'' .. INTERIOR WA TERSHED DIVIDES PROPOSED STORM SEWER 42" EXISTING STORM SEWER 4m'f OPEN ,CHANNEL - .,. STORM WATER STORAGE AREA INUNDATION AREA STORAGE AREA VOLUME N '•' DISCHARGE IN CFS •. C i T Y� �--- •=• LIMITS •.- •r 0 , 00 • • B 00••� 1200 ••. •�. SCALE IN FEE. •• .. ..... .: ..... ........ .. .......... .. .. . .. ... _. .... .. .. ... ...... .. ..:: MAP EXCERPT FROM MAFLEWOOD DRAINAGE PLAN -------- - - .v �� ti ` - 40. es •- -�.►� eslit •�� •iso 3 \ w 2 1 tr : I /cv A10 o . >> o e s _..ns._.. 5 / V �' '•� X00 do 00cr)) 0 1 /* 12 10 / . 'Q 100 8 o 100 • f it cc in CD 8o 40 15 . l 8 o e o/ l V, , 170 ! o soot / w+ R�I~AoE�' " AN Je Or op 0 00, EXCERPT FROM SCS' s SOILS REMRT IL, j NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSU- LTANTS INC. December 17, 1981 Mr. Sanford Brink 2,926 La Bore Road r {. Little Canada, Minnesota to 55109 Dear Mr. Brink: J The City of Maplewood p ood has recently asked -the Litt • Comment on a rel imi n 1e Canada City Council to P ary plat which has been proposed • Since the property inabuts P P �d by Mr. Richard Anderson. o question t i on a buts the south side of Your n LaBore Road, it is understandable y r Property located development. bl a that you would be concern • ed with is The City Council has direct -. ed our office, as the City's la to inform you are wi P nni ng consultants, the that -they l l i n9 to review alternative area � n question, but feel it w roadway schemes for dollars to r would be inappropriate to spend ' resolve one property owner's P City tax .potential beneficiari concerns. Past policy has been that es of such City action should b • costs of the necessary study, Ba a responsi-ble for the if you are interested y , sed upon this policy, .you 'are advised • y terested in having the Ci dvised that City Council is City study this issue, a request t required on your part. q to the Please contact Joe Ch1. • ebeck at City Hall(484-2177)- on some futur - � f you wish' to b e Council meeting agenda. I f a placed this matter, feel free you have any questions regarding rd i n to contact our office(925-9420)9 9 at any time. Sincerely, 1 NO THWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. Bradley .Nielsen Senior Planner BJN/nd cc: Little Canada City Council Joe Chlebeck Cl a ton Parks an-- dy Johnson - Maplewood r 'T 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-4a9n GERVAIS OUTLOOK _ PRELIMINARY PLAT MAP 3 L 1 - - — - 200 - ✓�- • r �� r LITTLE CANADA S P - ',a' '„r 4 1 _ 1329 4 322 I tgs'S } r 4 u F_ ire • `' 3 t \ MAPLEWOOD � ' 1B .?4 opt. --4pi 14 odd I JAC ►p IN, CV, ~- Oct PROPOSED RAMSEY COUNTY DITCH #7 22.21 �� . �” - G N1.0 . ''�' PONDING AREA AND OPEN SPACE ar t w g� R } N i 18. 4 iso • SO lb 3 m p 10 010 X MAP 2 PROPERTY LINE MAP .. N C. Preliminary Plat: Gervais Overlook , Secretary Olson said the applicant i.s requesting q ing approval of a preliminary plat for twelve detached single -dwelling 1 i n9 homes S • 9 taff i s recommending approval as outlined in their report, Richard Anderson, 2830 Keller Parkway,thought ou ht this .acceptable 9 proposal was as a plat. Commissioner Kishel moved the Planninq Commission Cit r _ d he _.....y_._ Counci 1 approval of the prel imi nary plat. sub 'ect • the f 1final. o compl yo ng with _.olow� ng__condi ti ons before fi nal lata roval : r 1 Remedial soils measures ba • i sed upon soil boring data and analysis, shall the submitted to the City Building Official for approval . pp These i measures must insure that the lots proposed n areas with unstable soils can meet, building code requirements, . 2. Council awarding a construction contract for the extension n of sanitary sewer to the site or approval of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission ss�on for use of their sewer in Arcade Street, 3. Final grading, drainage, and utility plans must be • p •approved by the Cit Engineer. These plans shall include, but not be limited to th provision for all drainage t ' ' e • o be directed to the interior of the plat and corrected contour lines that accurately reflect existing and topography, proposed 4, The City of Little Canada ordering the extension of water t ' o the site. to . i5. A signed developer's agreement, with the required surety, s submitted to the City Engineer for public improvements, includinga temporary for proposed Beam Avenue. 6. Dedication of drainage easements to Ramsey County y for Count Ditch No . 7. 7. Submission of an erosion control plan, before building permits ar P e issued, which considers the recommendations of the Soil Conservation Service. 8. Payment of deferred water assessments. _ 9. Omit outl of A and include this land i n lots 5 and 6 block 2. Provide a drainage easement over this area for the pnd and nd outlet pipe; the size and location to Y 9 be approved by the Cit En i Commissioner He j ny seconded Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl Barrett, El lefson, Fischer, Hejny, Howard, Ki shel , Pel l i sh S1 etten Whitcomb rib TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: v,APPLICANT: ,,PROJECT: 3DATE: - s MEMORANDUM City Manager Director of Community Development :. PUD and Preliminary Plat Revision Century Avenue and Ivy Avenue (S.W. corner) M and S Development Co. Cave's Century Addition May 6, 1982 SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL Request The applicant is requesting approval of a revised planned unit development (PUD) and preliminary plat to construct 32 townhouses. Proposed Land Use w 1. The 32 townhouses would be divided into four buildings, with eight units per building. 2. Each townhouse would have its own garage. 3. The common area and interior drives labeled "outl of A" on the plat, would be owned and maintained by a homeowner's association. 4. 24 visitor parking spaces are provided. 5. There would be one tuck -under garage space for each townhouse. 6. The townhouses would all contain two bedrooms. 7. Each of the townhouses would have a different design. Recommendation (Those items deleted have been completed) I. Approval of the revised PUD, subject to revising the original conditions as follows (additions underlined and deletions crossed out): 1:--Start4Rg-eeRstpwet4ep-w4th4R-ene-year7 2=-4he-PUD-may-be-repewed-after-eee-year-by-EeuRe4l-appreyal-4f-ees- strbet4en-has-Ret-started- 4- "No Parking"sins to be laced on the private drives to maintain emergency vehicle access.; I I . Approval of the preliminary plat revision subject to reviling the original conditions as follows (additions underlined and deletions crossed out): 4,--Vaeat4ee-ef-Farrell-Street - 1 - Footings for double, townhouse or quad units shall be pinned by a registered surveyor before the foundation is laid to assure that party walls will be constructed exactly on common lot lines. 2. -8: All building construction shall comply with the approved PUD. 3. -47 Submission of proposed bike trail easements. .6---Appreval-of-tbe-PUD--street-vaeat4ens- s 4. -6- Submission of a signed developers agreement to be approved by the Director of Public Works. 5. -7: The developer's agreement shall include the construction of a 10 -foot trail and fencing on the proposed bike trail easements, to be approved by the Director of Comuni ty Services. 6. -8- The developer's agreement shall include construction of a minimum five- foot chain link. fence on the Century East Townhouse property line, from the west boundary of the Century East Apartments, to the north- west corner of the townhouse property, and from the same corner to the northwest corner of 1 of .8, bl ock 1. Myhra Addi ti on . The Century East Townhouse Association shall sign an agreement to completely fence the remainder of the recreation area, including a lockable gate. The Association shall file an irrevocable letter of credit or cash deposit with the City within one week of the si gn-i ng of the Devel oper' s agree- ment, for the Association's share of the fence cost. If the fence is not constructed by the Association within 60 days after the developer has completed his part of the fence, the Association's security deposit shall be forfeited to the developer as reimbursement for his costs. Failure of the Townhouse Association to agree to this condition shall end the developer's responsibility for fencing. 7. -97 Approval of final utility and drainage plans by the Director of Public Works . 8. 197 Implementation of the recommendations of the Soil Conservation Service. 9. Enl arQe the utility easement for sanitary sewer and watermai n to thirty feet in width. 10. An easement from the adjacent property owner must be submitted for off-site grading. 11. Revise the plat to provide twenty feet between blocks three and four. 12. Revise the plat to provide fi ft y feet between blocks two and three. T if am 2 BACKGROUND Site Description gross average: 5.089 acres 9 { net average: 4.229 acres existing land use: undeveloped 3. s Surrounding Land Uses Iv Avenue. North of Ivy Avenue is an undeveloped parcel planned northerly:Y for RM, residential medium density use and zoned M-2, heavy manufacturing. The property Owner, Dick Pearson, is considering developing a mobile home park. easterly: Century Avenue, Y n e. East of Century Avenue is undeveloped land in . Oakdale. southerly: The Century East Apartments. westerly: Undeveloped land approved by the City for single dwellings and a p double dwelling on Ivy Avenue. Past Actions 2-7-80: Council approved a preliminary plat and PUD for the area bounded on the h b Iv Avenue, on the east by Century Avenue, on the south by Maryland Ave- nue, and the west by Ferndale Street, except for the Century East p a g 9 and the single dwellings on Maryland Avenue. (See enclosed plan.) The area to be revised in the northeasterly cul-de-sac development. This was approved for 32 quad units. DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Plannin 1. Plan Update designation: 2. Allowed density: 3. Proposed density: RM 22 people per net acre 25.0 (townhouses) 21.7 (overall PUD) 4. Zoning: F, farm residence -5. Section 906.400 (F) (.b) of City Code states that "Where t�vo or more buildings of8 units occur on one lot, the side yards between buildings shall be a minimum of twenty (20) feet apart." -- 6. Blocks three and four are only nineteen feet apart. 10 ?. Section 906.400 (g) (b) states that "Where two or more buildings occur on one lot their combined total rear yards shall be no less than fifty (50) feet from building to building." 8. Blocks two and three are only 39 feet apart. 9. All other ordinances are complied with. 3 Public Works Sanitary sewer and water are available. Procedure 1. Planning Commission recommendation 2. City Council - public hearing and decision r--1 --...--- 1. Location Map 2, Property Line Map 3, Site Plan 4, 1980 PUD/Preliminary Plat -4- NORTH ST PAUL N 1� 120 HOLLOW((Ay AVE. qF7. IL .. ;� o 212 j 0 .�: I [PLEY AVE. J O O O = 30 ARPENTE R AVZ 0 F_ 10AH0 AVE.Uj _z cc 3 �--7 MONTANA k E. cr z MARYLAKE RD. G Y AVE . Y l .ti Trailer Court &001�= 68r i t (P vc e) 212 E MARYLAND A 31 --- -._ 69 _amu 8 'r• v ��B QOver MA NOLIA AVE. W a p < LOke W PL 68 69 = o -CASE w M- z HARVESTER -A t 32 1 > b 212 � EL LA. BRAND AVE.:.. 32 DST. LOCATION MAP IQ r R I- -A 02 -oXx-v 2 vo- I.a., 30 MO. 33P% '044.5 •- eo�%%` 400r. -<�Ooomog00%:' wg va J:i• $'-.�!.00 ewm "' OX VA • :X. Y .oXv X* eX W. ..W.X *to 5 6 Y., :. o . ... .. of -3 A:* i. %Vl N K6*00 x! 8 7• W•., N YZ .1; N "o o. m -*of s. yerop - - , , * Woo ..Xo. 9 10 �� O ••• . �.,St, i :••sYJ:rrtiY�'•�y�,•A•r: ,�L,�,:i,• • X;: /4f I.0 21 8 Xe % X X � wgg iX to So N :c —4 X be.. !QPQ!•V.% X; —T *:'$0 X-M-oir. X MXYN. a 's /404. 7' XX - —N 16 D 15 0 n -- -- --------- OD ' � 17 �-- 1 �3 Q � _ 20Z 19 I Uj 22 Z3 1401 - C7' 024C) 23 LLJ25 26 ,4 >28 27 6' ;� <29 30 ffTTL—JFLG7RN JMV L. 2 -7d-- 4 0 33 34 of 4 3 2 :L4 14: 5 1 23 36 V 3500 ti G 441? 9c AL N. r .4 BL c 10 12 13 7 37 12 13 14 38 39" 40 9 7:P RO' F to omI a* PROPERTY LINE MAP Ali V qW 5C SAO -Am, _alt IL w -W �i1 `• t pa 9w l • TWT .8 4w 44=b lw op - • -.I Pj VOW 41 Ott 00- s - f T � 1 ' LjO. - -A 4b .P► • - r , + AN S •-- • 4F 46 41 0468 • AWO 41 t 4C 4ft die_: It L 7, 46 fi0o' r � � f . � "'.�` .: 'G Z _ - `�► . �� � '•..� .yam �' `_.", ••�' `• � •+A „- r 7"� _•�. � J �• • �'� i t. -� •• - LPETITIONER REQUEST 1980 PUS/PRELIMI NARY PLAT Cave's Century ,Addition. D. Prelminary Plat and PUD Revision: • � requesting approval of a revised Secretary Olson said the applicant is req g PP PUD. and preliminary plat t o i construct 32 townhouses. Staff s recommending approval as outlined in their report. The Commission ssion discussed with Secretary Olson whether the parking ProP osed,at 1 3/4 spaces per unit,would be adequate. u hl i n M & S Development, ment, said he had nothing to add Len McGo g � P h report. The proposed change in the PUD will change the • tote p P P .architecture of the area from the Quad design to the townhouse design* arch tectu e _ s he Pl anni n Commission rec_orrimend to the Commissioner Pel 1 i sh .moved t ..9_ • rova 1 of the rev i_sed PUD ,sub j ect to del et i n i terns �. Cjty Council_�.app - l - --- - - and_._2 of the origi nal PUD and inserting_ "No Parking" signs to be placed on the private drives to g g maintain emergency vehicle access. Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl,. Whitcomb Barrett, El l efson Fischer, He jny, Howard, Ki steel , Pel l i sh, S1 etten, Why Commissioner Pel 1 i sh moved._the P.�_a.nn_mg_C.omm_i ssi__�on recommend to the royal of the rel imina�__.plat revision, subject to the City ..Counci_l app _ -p? _ .._._ _-- revised condi tions being as follows* • townhouse or quad units shall be pinned by a 1. Footings for double, to registered or before the foundation is laid to assure that party surveyor walls will be constructed exactly on commonly lot lines. 2. All building construction shall comply with the approved PUD. 3. Submission a proposed of bike trail easements. 4. Submission of a signed develoPer's agreement to be approved by the Director of Public Works* include th 5. The developer e construction of a 10 -foot s agreement shall • • ' proposed bike trail easements, to be approved trail and fencing on the p p by the Director of Community Services 6 1 The Bevel o-pers agreement shall include construction of a minimum five- foot ee foot chain link fence on the Century East Townhouse property line, from boundary of the Century East Apartments, to the northwest corner the west boun y the northwest f the townhouse property, and from the same corner to o block 1 M hra Addition. The Century East Townhouse corner of lot 8, � Y remainder nder of the to shall sign an agreement to completely fence the ` Assoc�a 9 • including a lockable a ate . The Association ati on shall • file recreation area, � ncl ud� g g � n one letter of credit or cash deposit with the City within an irrevocable 1 e ' s of the developer's agreement, for the Association week of the signing b share of the fence cost. If the fence is not constructedy the Association within 60 days after the developer has completed his part of •the fen ce , the Association's security deposit shall be forfeited to the developer as reimbursement for his costs. Failure of the Townhouse A�sociation to � agree to this condition shall end the developer's response bi 1 i ty for fencing. r 7. Approval of final utility and drainage plans by the Director of Public r Works.. r 8. Implementation of the recommendations of the Soil Conservation Service, 9. Enl arge the uti 1 i ty easement for sani ta-ry sewer and watermai n to. th.i rty feet in width. { - 1.0. An easement from the adjacent property owner must be submitted for ta off-site grading. tyRevise the plat to provide twenfeet betweens blocks three and four. 120 Revise the plat to provide fifty feet between blocks two and three. Commissioner Ki shel seconded Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl , Barrett, El lefson, Fischer, Hejny, Howard, Kishel , Pel 1 ish, Sletten, Whitcomb. I T • MEMORANDUM To City Manager From Finance Director Re Award of Bids - Bond Sale R :. Dane June 7, 1982 • Temporary Improvement Bonds e� result of bids on the $ 3 , 0 5 0, 0 0 0 . P y , resenta- Th a r� • at the June 14th Council meeting by P wild.. be reported re scheduled to be opened iv of Juran and Moody. These bids a d bid t � June 14th and 7:30 p m. is the scheduled at x:00 P•m• on Ju the resolution that needs award time. Attached is a draft copy of to be adopted to award the bid. EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD * MINNESOTA HELD: June 14, 1982 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesot was Y a duly held at the City Hall in the City . on the 14th da of June, 1982, at 7:30 P.M,,. for the purpose of • •y sale of$3,050,000 considering bids for and awarding the General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds of 1982 of the City. The following members were present: and the following were absent: The Clerk presented affidavits showing publication of notice of call for bids on $3,050,.000 General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds of 1982 of the City, for which bids Po p were to be received at 3:00 P . M. at the City Hall Council Chambers, in accordance with the resolution adopted by the City Council on IApril 15 1932 . The. of f idavits were examined, found to comply with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter P Y 475, and were approved and ordered placed on file. The Council proceeded to open bids for the sale of bonds,which bids were received by the Council at 3:00 P . M . the The following bids were received* Bidder Interest Rate Net Interest Cost The Council proceeded to consider and discuss the bids, after which member _ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID ON SALE OF $3,050,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION ; TEMPORARY IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1982 { , r PROVIDING FOR THEIR ISSUANCE ~- BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City . of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The bid of to purchase $3,050,000 General. Obligation Teraporary Improvement Bonds of 1982 of the City, in accordance with the notice of bond sale, at the rates of interest hereinafter set forth, and pay ay therefor the sum of $ _ plus interest accrued to settlement is hereby found, determined and declared to be the most favorable bid received, and is hereby accepted and the bonds are hereby awarded to said bidders The Clerk is directed to retain the deposit -of said bidder and to forthwith return theg ood faith checks or drafts to the unsuccessful bidders. The bonds shall be payable as to principal and interest at or an successor paying agent duly appointed by the City. y p y g g 2. The $3,050,000 negotiable coupon general obliga- tion bonds of the City shall be dated July 1, 1982 and shall be issued forthwith. The bonds shall be 610 in number and numbered from 1 to 610, both inclusive, in the denomination of $5,000 each . All of the bonds shall mature on July 1, 1985s, 3. The bonds shall provide funds to refund at maturity the City's outstanding General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds of 1979, dated August 1, 1979 (the "Prior Bonds") and to provide funds for the construction of various improvements in the City (the "Improvements"). The total cost of theur oses for which the bonds were issued is estimated to F p be at least equal to the amount of the bonds herein authorized. 4. The bonds shall bear interest payable January 1, 1983 and semiannually thereafter on July 1 and January 1 of each year at the rate per annum of percent ( %) • 5. All or any portion of the bonds shall be subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City, on July T 1, 1983 and on any interest payment date thereafter at par and accrued interests If only a part of the bonds are _ called for -- 3 =w the specific c i f i c bonds to be prepaid sha 11 be chosen by .,prepayment,p tice of lot by the paying agent Thirty days published no case be given. in accordance with . Law, redernptlon shall In each tice of redemption shall be given to the bank and mailed no � ice of redemption where the bonds. are payable The form of notA. is attached hereto as Exhibit A. bonds and interest coupons to beL issued 6 . The b - e in substantially the following form: � hereunder shall b _ . UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA RAMSEY COUNTY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD No $5,r000 v ~ GENERAL OBLIGATION TEMPORARY IMPROVEMENT BOND OF 1982 _ {NOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS that the City of Ma l ewood. y Rams a County, Minnesota, certifies that it is p indebted and for value received promises to pay to bearer the principal sum of FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS on the first day of July, 1985 and to payinterest thereon from the date hereof until the principal is paid at the rate of percent %) per annum a P Y able on the first-day of January, 1983 and semiannual) thereafter on the first day of July and the first Y .. day of January in each year, interest to maturity being represented by and payable in accordance with and upon P resentation and surrender of the interest coupons hereto _ attached, as the same severally become due. Both principal and interest are payable at. - or any successor paying agent duly appointed by the City, in any coin or currency of the United States of America which at the time of payment is legal tender for public and private debts. All or any portion of the bonds of this issue are subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City, Y on Jul 1, 1983. and on any interest payment . date thereafter at par and accrued interest. If only a part of the bonds are called forre a ment the specific bonds to be prepaid shall, be P P y chosen by lot by the paying agent. Thirty days published notice i of redemption shall in each case be given in accordance j with law, and mailed notice of redemption shall be given to the bank where the bonds are payable. This bond is one of an issue in the total principal amount of $3e.O5OsOOO all of like date and. tenor, except as to serial number, which bond has-been issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota for the purpose of providing money to refund at maturity the City's outstanding General Obligation. Temporary Improvement Bonds of 1979, dated August 1, 1979 and to provide funds for the construction of various improvements Lin the City a payable L and is a able out of the Special- Assessment Fund. of the City, and into which fund there are to be paid the proceeds of the improvement nt bonds which the City is required by law* to issue at or prior to the. maturity of this bond for the purpose of refunding the sane if the special assessments theretofore collected or any other municipal funds which are properly available and are appropriated by the City Council for such purpose, are not suf f icient for the payment thereof . This bond constitutesfor the prompt a general obligation of the City and to provide moneys and full payment of the principal and P interest when the same become due, the full faith and credit of said City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to happen and to be F� precedent recedent to and in the issuance of this bond, have been done, have happened and have been performed, in regular form time and manner as required by law, and this and due bond, together with all other debts of the City outstanding on the date hereof and the date of its actual issuance and delivery does not exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation of indebtedness. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Maplewood, Ramsey, Y Count , Minnesota, by its city Council has caused this bond to be executed. in its behalf by the facsimile signature of the Mayor and the manual signature of the Clerk, the corporate seal of the City having been intentionally omitted as permitted by law and has caused the interest coupons to be executed and authenticated by the facsimile signatures of said officers, all as of July 1, 1982. /s/ Facsimile Clerk Mayor (Form of Coupon) No. $ On the first day Yr of January (July 19 unless the bond described below is called for earlier redemption, the City of Maplewood., Ramsey County, Minnesota, will pay to bearer at or any appointed by the City, the sum successor paying agent duly shown hereon for interest then due on its General obligation s Tern rar Improvement Bond of 198 2 , No. dated July 1, � Y p- 1982. /s/ Facsimile /s/ Facsma.le Clerk Mayor 's -- 3 =w =i 7. The bonds shall be executed on behalf of the City by 9 the signatures of its Mayor and Clerk and be sealed with the seal of the City; provided, that one (or both) of the s g i natures and the seal of the City may be printed facsimiles (Iff the bonds are also signed manually by at least one such . officer); and provided further that the corporate seal may be omitted on the bonds as permitted by law. The intdrest coupons pertaining thereto shall be executed by the printed., engraved P 9 or lithographed facsimile signatures of the Mayor y and Clerk._ 8. The bonds when so prepared and executed shall be delivered by the Treasurerr to the purchaser thereof upon receipt of the purchase. pride, and the purchaser shall not be obliged to see to the proper application thereof* 9. There has heretofore been created a Debt Service Account (the "1979 Debt Service Account") in the "General obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds of 1979 Fund". The 1979 Debt Service Account was established for the purpose of paying therinci al and interest on the Prior Bonds. of the proceeds P P derived from the, bonds herein authorized, $ shall be credited to the 1979 Debt Service Account Cwhich sum, together with sums already held in the 1979 Debt Service Account, is sufficient to pay all principal and interest to become due on the Prior Bonds on August 1, 1982) . Any surplus in the 1979 Debt Service Account in excess of such requirements is hereby 'pledged ed and shall be credited to the Common Debt Service Acco.unt hereinafter provided for; and, upon determination of such surp lus all uncollected special assessments and taxes, if any, payable to the 1979 Debt Service Account are hereby pledged and shall thereafter also be credited to the Common Debt Service Accountl 10. There has heretofore been created a special fund P designated "Special Assessment Fund" held and administered by the City Treasurer separate and apart from all other funds of y the City. Said fund shall continue to be maintained in the manner heretofore specified until all of the bonds heretofore, herein and hereafter authorized and made payable from said fund and the interest thereon have been fully paid* In said fund there shall be created and maintained a separate account, to be designated as the 111982 Improvement Bonds Construction Account". The proceeds of the sale of the bonds herein authorized less (1) any accured interest received thereon, (2) any p n amount aid for said bonds in excess of $2,990,525, and (3) $ to be credited to the 1979 Debt Service Account, PY lus an special assessments levied with respect to the Improvements and collected prior to completion of the Improvements and- payment of the costs thereof, shall be Z credited to the 1982 Improvement Bonds Constructioli Account or the Construction Account heretofore created anddesignated specifically ecificall for a particular improvement, from which there shall bePa id all costs and expenses of making the Improvements ' c udin the cost of any construction contracts heretofore including 9 d al 1 other cos �s let, the costs of issuance of the bonds an .incurred and to be incurred of the kind authorized-- in Minnesota es Section 475.65; and the moneys in said account shall S tatut , otherwise rovided by be used for no other purpose except as P ; a provided that the bond proceeds may also be used to the laws p t on said bonds due prior to the extent necessary to pay interes -_ted date of commencement of the collection of special anti.cipa assessments herein covenanted to be levied; and provided er that if u on completion of the Improvements there shall f urth P com P balance i remain any unexpendedn the 1982 Improvement Bonds Construction Account or such other Construction Account, said than an special assessments) Wray be transferred balance (other Y by the Council to the account of any other improvement i pursuant ursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429; and provided further that any special -assessments credited to the 1p982 Improvement Bonds Construction Account or such other Construction Account, are hereby pledged and shall be used only toPaYP principal al and interest due on the bonds and any improvement bonds issued to refund the bonds. There is hereby pledged and there shall be credited to the Common Debt Service Account heretofore created (a.) all collections of special assessments herein covenanted to be levied and either initially credited to the 1982 Improvement Bonds Construction Account or such other Construction Account and required to pay any nci al and interest due on the bonds or collected subsequent principal to the completion of the Improvements and payment of the costs f -(b)all accrued interest received upon delivery of thereo said bonds, (c) all funds paid for said bonds in excess of 0 525(d)an collections of all taxes hereafter levied, $2,99 Y remaining ` f an for the payment of the bonds; (e) all funds r g 1 y� Bonds Construction Account or such in the 1982 Improvement � he other Construction Account after completion of t Improvements -payment of the costs thereof; ' not so transferred to • the and pay account of another improvement and (f)'all funds remaining in to the 1979 Debt Service Account after provision. for or payable _ principal payment of all r inc i al and interest due. on the bonds payable therefrom. The Common Debt Service Account shall be used solely to pay a the costs of issuance of the improvement bonds to be issued to refund the bonds herein authorized and to pay principal and interest and any premiums, if any, for redemotion on the bonds nd issued hereunder and any other general obligation bonds of the Cit heretofore or hereafter issued by the City and madePaY able from said account as provided by law. The Cit in its discretion for accounting purposes create - Y may separate subaccounts in the Common Debt Service Account for individual issues of improvement bonds. Any sul'ns from time to time held in the Common Debt Service Account or any other City account which will be used to pay principal or interest to become due on the bonds) in excess of amounts which under the applicable federal arbitrage regulations may be invested ; without regard as toyield shall not be invested at a yield in excessof the applicable. yield restrictions imposed by said Pp arbitrage regulations on such investments after taking into • �� an applicable temporary periods" made available under account y pp _ the federal arbitrage regulations . a 11. The City has heretofore levied special _ assessments, pursuant to resolution which assessments were s e to the payment of the principal and interest, on • the pledged payment of principal and. Prior Bonds and are now pledged to the payor p P interest on the bonds herein authorized. Said assessments were y levied in the ears to The balance of said special assessments levied in 81 and collectible in 1982 and all collectible- thereafter including any delinquent assessments assessments -shall be payable in equal, consecutive, annual installments, with general taxes for the years shown below and installm .with interst on the declining balance of all such assessments at the rate shown opposite such years e Improvement Desi nation Amount Rate Levy dears 12* It is hereby determined - that no less than 20% of e cit of each improvement within the meaning of the cost to the Y n 1 3 shall be Statutes Section 475.58, Subdivision t � Minnesota , aid b special assessments to be levied against every p Y p dparcel of land bene f i. ted by the assessable lot, piece an improvements* The Cit hereby covenants and agrees that it �mprovemen Y will let all construction contracts not heretofore let within one year after ordering each Improvement financed hereunder fies a unless the resolution ordering the Improvement speci ruction contracts different time limit for the letting of const 3 z.. and it will hereafter $'authori.ze by resolution" (within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475-55(3), as amended),, the special assessments and it will do and perform as soon as may be done all acts and things necessary for the final they Y Y and valid levy of such -special assessments, and in the event time held invalid with assessment be at an that. any such Y respect defect, o irregularity, to any lot, piece or parcel of land due to any error, r irre ularit , in any action or proceedings taken or .. to be taken by the City or this Council or any of the City _ ri officers or employees, either in the making of the -assessments s or in the performance of any condition precedent thereto, the s City and this Council will forthwith do all further acts and _ take all further proceedings as may be required by law to make the assessments a valid and binding lien upon such property. 13. To further provide moneys for the prompt and full payment of principal and interest on the temporary improvement Ym P P bonds,p the City -shall issue and sell improvement bonds, at or prior to the maty urit date of the bonds issued hereunder, in such amounts as are needed to pay the principal and interest then due on the temporary improvement bonds after the application of the assessments theretofore collected, and the appropriation of such other municipal funds as are properly P available for such purpose. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the estimated collections of special assessments to .be received before the maturity date of the temporary improvement bonds, together with the proceeds of p rY p any improvement rovement bonds to be .issued at or before the maturity date and other revenues pledged for the payment of the temporary improvement rovement bonds and the interest thereon will equal at least 5% in excess of the principal and interest requirements of the temporary improvement bonds as the same become due. For theP rompt and full payment of the principal and interest on the bonds, as the same respectively become due, the f• ull faith credit and taxing powers of the City shall be and are'hereby hereby ii irrevocably pledged. If the balance n the Common Debt Service Account is ever insufficient to pay all principal and interest then due on the bonds payable therefrom, the deficiency shall be promptly paid out of any other funds of the City t which are available for such purpose, and such other funds may be reimbursed with or without interest from the Common Debt Service Account when a sufficient balance is available therein. 14. The Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the County Auditor of Ramsey County, Minnesota, together with such other information as he shall ll re uire and to obtain from the Auditor his certificate g that the bonds have been entered in the Auditor's Bond Register* of of the Cit 15 . The o Y are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and f urni sh to the, purchaser of the t ernpo r a ry improvement bonds and to the attorneys. approving the --- _s legality Y alit of the issuance thereof, certified copies of all pro- ceedings and records of the City relating to t'ne bonds and to the f inancial condition and a f fairs of the City, and such other ,affidavits,certificates and information as are. required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the bonds as the sane appear from the books and records under their c u s todY and control or as otherwise. known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, Y includingan heretofore furnished, shall be deemed represen- tations of the City as to the facts recited therein. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and n taken thereon, the following voted in favor upon vote being thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I g the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract he ori inal thereof on file in my office, and of minutes with tg that the same is a fulls true and complete transcript of the ' meeting of the Cit Council of said City, duly minutes of a g Y called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to the considering of bids for and awarding the sale of $3,050,000 General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds of 1982 of said City. _ WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this day of , 1982* Clerk (SEAL) EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF CALL FOR RE DEM PT I O N GENERAL OBLI GAT I ON TEMPORARY IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1932 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD -_ RAMSEY COUNTY MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that by order of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, there have been called for redemption and prepayment on outstanding bonds of the City designated as General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds of 1982, dated July 1, 1982, bearing serial numbers _ through , having stated maturity dates in the year 1985 and totaling $ In principal amount. The bonds are being called, at a price of par plus accrued interest to , h on which date all interest on said bonds will cease to accrue. Holders of .the bonds herebycalled for redemption are requested to present their bonds for payment, with and subsequently maturing interest coupons attached, . at the .in , Minneso-ta, on or before - Dated • BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /sew . I - -0"-- - City Clerk Additional information may be obtained from: T j i1 i S i i i. MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Associate Planner --Randall Johnson SUBJECT: Code Amendment --DATE:. :. May 26, 1982 On May 20, Council tabled second reading and adoption f 9o code amendments to define rooming and boarding houses. First reading had beeniven on April 1st. 9 Tabl ing' was to correct an error in the numberingof the rdefinitions. T p oposed The revised ordinance proposal is attached. Recommendation Give second reading and final adoption to the attached code amendment establishing definitions for rooming 9 and boarding houses. jw Enclosure Ordinance ORDI NANCE' NO . AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 214 AND 916 OF THE MAPL EWOOD CITY CODE RELATING TO THE DEFINITION OF BOARDING AND ROOMING HOUSE V. t. .JK COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: s r 'recti on 1. Section 214.040 (4) (X) i s hereby amended as follows (language to be deleted is crossed out and proposed language i s underlined): �-�..Ree��R�-Neese-�ha��.,�eaR-aRy-�eb�deREe-bb��d�R--eR-aR - apt-theRe eeRta*R*R§-aRe-er-mare -reefa�Rg--eR ts;-*R-wh4eh-spaee4s-ReRted-by-the ewRer-eR-eperater-te-three-ep mere-mere-perseRs-whe-aRe-Ret-hesband-er w��e;-seR-eR-�ae�hteR3--�etheR-eR-fa_the��-s�ste�-B�-bRetheR-ef-the ewRer-eR-eperatep. x. Rooming House: As defined in Section 916.010(20) of the City Zonin Code. For purposes of this ordinance, there shall be no distinction. Trade between rooming and boarding house. Section 2. Section 916.010 is hereby amended to add the fol-lowinglanguage: 916..010 (19) Boarding House: A rooming house in which meals are provided. 916.010 (20) Rooming House: Any single housekeeping unit in'which space is rented, 1 ess meals, to persons unrelated to the resident manager or property owner, i n excess of the definition of family, as defined in Section 916.010(7). Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Council thi s day of , 1982. Ramsey County DEPARTMENT OF pUgLIC WORKS 3377 North Rice Street Saint Paul, Minnesota 55112 (812) 184-9104 Mr.. Barry Evans Maplewood City Engineer 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Kohlman Wetland Acquisition - Lake Ph • Phalen Restoration Project Divisions of: Engineering Maintenance Mobile Equipment Environmental Services Ramsey County currently has a restoration project underway on the Phalen chain of lakes under the Environmental Protection Agency Clean Lakes Program. Many designs for the restoration project have involved the use of wetlands for filtration purposes to remove nutrients and suspended solids from runoff water prior to inflow to the chain of lakes. One of the major systems proposed is Treatment Sy immediately p the Kohlman Wetland �eatment S stem in tely east of Kohlman Lake and west o y the Ditch 18 enters Kohl ' f Trunk. Highway 61 where Count Kohlman Lake. The system will consist of au n pond design which will divert inflowp rnp and a distribution water from County Ditch 18 to the wetland o the east side of Kuhlman Lake prior n p to discharge Into the lake itself. The Open Space Division of the County Parks and Recreation De ar • the Public Works Department in necessaryP,on for the wetland tment well assist land or easement acqu�s�tL treatment system. As stated in the authorizingCount B • from the Y Gard resolution, we are now seeking a City of Maplewood for the acquisitions. g pproval consideration b the Cit q ns. Please schedule this request for Y y Council. The affected properties are indicated trap. I have enclosed a suggested resolution lcated on the enclosed tion for City Council consideration. Please call me if you require furtherZnformatl• on. T Nniel G. Schacht, PX, Environmental Services Engineer DGS/clm Enclosures e RESOLUTION HOHLMAN WETLAND TREATMENT SYSTEM LAND ACQDLSTTTON w wtr WHEREAS, Ramsey . County has undertaken a restoration ' ion project -_on the. Phalen Chain of lakes- under the Environmental Protection- Agency Clean Lakes. - Program; and WHEREAS, Many project design plans for the g P restoration project have involved the.---u'se of wetlands for filtration purposes to remove nutrients and suspended soli ds from runoff water prior to inflow to the chain of lakes.• and WHEREAS, One of the major systems proposed is the Kohlman man Wetland Treatment System adjacent to the east side of Kohlman Lake near where County Ditch 18 enters ' the lake; and WHEREAS, In order to install the system it will be - • y necessary to acquire certain properties or easements that would be affected by thestern installation County .. Ditch 18 flow • and�' ior the diverted. , WHEREAS, The Board of Ramsey County Commissioners have authorized the acquisition of certain lands or easements needed for the Kohlman Wet System,_ and has ordered theland Treatment Public Works Department to seek approval of the Cit of Maplewood for the acquisitions. y NOW, THEREFORE, DOES THE CITY COU NC IL OF MAPLEWOOD, Approve the acquisition of certain lands or easements on the east side of Kohlman Lake for the Kohlman Wetland Treatmentin Maplewood eat ment System, by Ramsey County for the Lake Phalen Restoration Project. r� L Dis Resolution CO so.ra or tlIlIU GO11211I1SS10172I'S Presented B _ �"_ co -^^� orQ�rd Dat! Aril 26 1982 : No. 82-405 Attention: p ' _=Nowr .� Budget & Accoun t fn • IC. Wel 8 � tz iso, Public Works; -_ ;. A.J: ' Crea, Parks b Recreation; WHEREAS$ County Board Resolution #80-168 approved on Febru$ P ry.11, 1980, amended. the Scope of Work Plan for the Lake Phalen. Restoration Project which includes the installation of a system described as the Krohlman Wetland Treat- ent System; and tt WHEREAS, In order to install. the system, it i Y , s necessary to acquire certain properties that would be affected by the system installation or overflow; Now Therefor by the diverted , e 8e It , KESOLVED, That -the Board of Ramsey County Commissioners' hereby. authorizes • the Environmental Services Division of the RamseyCount P orf th the assistance of Y Public Works DeDepartment, the Parks and Recreation Department, to acquire certain lands or easements needed for the installation of the Ko h .man ire t l a nd . T r e a t went System which 1 a part of the Lake Phalen Restoriation P costs, including those for Project, and all land acquisition, Planning and Development personnel and system construction are proposed to be funded b v y En ironmental Protection Agency and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency f • 8 Y a rant ands, and Be It Further RESOLVED, That the Public Works De artment shat of Maplewood for P 1 seek approval of the city P the above referred to acquisitions as may be required b the City of Maplewood. Q Y t��F;•;.r cfa K. E. Y1. P. F. S. M. Do K. 0 L. ! . W. k. _-�.A'th- soitt.IlLftb A • all, saw spr MftL. ON* .j..+ Iry sea JL 'low ._ 1 F 1 4p 100, 00, 4 Q7 ­%drT ;r JL 4b A • � 44 100 A 0 .0 vvrT"V It 4 ♦ Sbdft 11.4 .... .... Aw oy W, + ♦ 4 4 1.0 .0 4 44#4 ♦ :10W 4 4 4 4. 4 4 0-1 10, 41 . qrp 44 .4.0 44*4*4*4+ 0 44 4 4 # 44 4 4 10 +6 +J4 16 s- too - W, er4•M" SLL.� Sol=, 44 44 1. low W- W% ob lot j- 0 So -A WNI sommomo sm mogg& fuel • 7%. TE 282 DEPARTMENT OF ASS RAMSEY COUNTY M R.G.G. 3- 15- W It 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 ---PERMANENT FLOWAGE EASEMENT TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION 8 a slisolimoo PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT loop j ��1� -PERMANENT FLOWAGE EASEMENT Ano•"••Mp fU PERMANENT FLOWAGE PERMANENT NO RESTRICTION ON FILLING OR••• A• n11911089111m ACCESS 13 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT EASEMENT SECTION 4 SCALE: 1"s 3001 R.22W I -T 2.9 N. DATE : 3/3/82 DRAWN, D. NAGLE MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager -i FROM: Assistant City'Engineer DATE: May 13, 1982 SUBJECT: Frost Avenue Reconstruction (From Birmingham to White Bear Avenue Action by Council: Encs -2S e. d. 1 FE j eo to Date The Ramsey County Department of Public Works has submittedrel imi nar P y plans for the reconstruction of Frost Avenue from Birmingham Street to White Bear Ave g Avenue.' The westerly limit t for this project was selected on the basis of keeping the entire improvement within the Wakefield Drainage District. The County is requesting that we review the preliminary plans for compatibilitywith p • City systems and long-range improvements prior to County conducted public hearings. Due to the magnitude of the contro- versy expressed during the last public hearing for a similar proposal, we are requesting -than p • • the City Council make a determination on to provide the County with either a positive or negative support for thero osal . p P The proposed improvements consist of the following: 1. Street reconstruction of Frost Avenue from Birmingham Street to White Bear Avenue to a width of 52 feet with concrete curb and gutter, 2. Storm sewer -trunk piping with catch basins from Manton Street to Prosperity Road. This system is proposed to outlet into the Grit chamber located in the Wakefield Park property. The i npl acesY stem east of Prosperity would be reconstructed to accommodate the new roadway width and elevations. 3. The County is requesting that the City consider construction of a detached eight -foot bituminous path from Hazelwood Street to White Bear Avenue. The County would pay for the initial cost of construction and the City would pay for any additional right-of-way needed for the path, 9 Y In conjunction with the County project, the City may wish to consider up- grading p grading several short sections of sanitary sewer and addition of sidewalk. The upgrading could . be accomplished by i n-housep ersonnel under routine maintenance and the sidewalk cost would be assessed to benefi tedro erti es . P p The County is proposing to utilize County State Aid Hi hwa _( CSAR g Y ) and County funds for eligible items. Costs associated with items not e.l i9 i bl e for this funding are anticipated to be picked up by the City, as follows: 1. Three-fourths of the cost of concrete curb and gutter 2. That portion of the storm sewer costs needed for drainage outside the r ig y ht=o f . wa g 3. Any utility upgrading or modification 4. City facilities added to the project such as sidewalk 5. Right"of-way acquisition for construction limits • is beyond the existing right-of-way. The only permanent right-of-way requirement known at this time would be on the northwest corner of Prosperity Road and Frost Avenue. It is the County's objective to see this improvement constructed in 1983, jw 2 MEMORANUUM TO: ken Haider - Director of Public Works FROM: Robert D. Odegard an. Director of Community Servi y ce SUBJECT: Path on Frost Avenue - Hazelwood to White Bear Avenue GATE: May 14, 1982 Even thougii the Comprehensive Plan does not indicate a trail aloe Frost Avenue, there i s a need U to prove de an East -Jest path to com- plete loops using the planned Hazelwood, Prosperity and White bear Avenue as Horth -South trails. This need would be reduced i f ire were certain of the acquisition and use of the abandoned Soo Line trackage for a trail, Examination of the proposal to encroach upon Wakefield p Park for the detached trail 'indicates that there may be lights moved but i t should be Ramsey Counties responsibility to pay all cos P � is for renovation of the banks, lights, and backstop, Since. long term maintenance and upkeepwill be the responsibility of the City, i t i s extremely ely important that the design and instal- lation are properly supervised, � T0: City Manager FROM Public Works Coordinator SUBJECT: Tree Removal Program DATE: April 22, 1982 - HISTORY OF THE TREE DISEASE CONTROL PROGRAM IN MAPLEWOOD TM!' Cit of Maplewood ewood has maintained a successful tree disease control � y p e ase o trot program since 1974. As Graph I shows, disease losses since 1977 have been declining. In 1977 more than 4,500 elms were lost to Dutch Elm Disease. In 1981 , elm losses were down to 400, about 1.2% of the Maplewood elm population. This decline in disease incidence is not due to a lack of elms, since an estimated 33,000.elms remain within the City. The success of our program is due to a rapid and nearly complete removal of hazardous elmwood--i.e. sanitation . Hazardous elmwood is any wood that is a breeding sit e for elm bark beetles, the main vectors for Dutch Elm disease,, Without continuing sanitation, and with such a large remaining elm population, Maplewood can expect a. tenfold increase in Dutch Elm disease losses within three years. We. cute five benefits to the City of Maplewood if we continue the high quality of our sanitation program: 1. By spreading our tree losses over a longer period of time, we facilitate efficient and orderly tree removal. 2. Aesthetically, a sound Dutch Elm disease management program insures that we will not lose all of our elm trees in a short period of time and become a barren landscape. 3. We will gain time to develop a comprehensive tree management program that will guide our tree planting efforts in an organized and agreed. upon manner in order to meet all our needs and to minimize the effect of any future plant epi demi cs . 4. We will save the majority of. our elm trees. 5. We will save money. Studies show that, depending on the level of control, a community can save from 35-75% of total tree removal costs and property value, over what it would cost without a control program. In summary, disease incidence is declining, but the City should maintain a minimum sanitation program for years to come. At this time, several decisions regarding the 1981, 1982 and 198.1 -Diseased Tree Removal Programs should be made. 1981 Program The time for preparation of the assessment roll for the trees removed in 1981 is upon us The State Grant in Aid for trees removed will be approximately $3,430.00 or about 10.7% of the total cost of $32,183.00. It is proposed to assess 90% of the cost of the removals to the affected property owners, and to pass on the 10% received from the State*' Boulevard trees would be assessed at 50% of the total removal costs (thisfs the maximum a"owed under State law) . Thp Ci ty' s total monetary burden. woul d be $6,028. 00 or $4 ,2T3.00 for trees .removed on City -owned property, plus $1 ,815.00 for the unassessed ortion of . P boulevard trees. The remaining $26,T55.00 would be recovered from assessments totaling $22,725.00, and the State Grant -in -Aid of $3,430'.00, 1982 Program State funds for the Shade Tree Program have been eliminated and the law requiring q 9 Maplewood to have a shade tree program has been changed to allow us to decide A f we wish to have a program at al 1. This would require reci ndi ng our ordinance. If the City elects to have a program, it must be conducted in accordance with our ordinance and the same State laws which were in effect in 1981. Based on the facts presented in the History of the Diseased Tree Removal Program in. Maplewood, and the disasterous conditions which would prevail if the9 Pro ram were to be dropped, it is recommended that the program for 1982 be authorized. Funding the 1982 program should be decided at this time. Three o tions appear to be available to us. They are: P 1. The City should pay all costs associated with the removal of all public c • p and private trees. Budgetary considerations weigh heavily against this option, therefore, it has been eliminated from further consideration at this time. 2. The City should assess 100% of the cost of all trees removed onrivate P property and 50% of the cost of removing boulevard trees. Thus opti'on would place the least burden on the budget. It is estimated that the total cost to the City would be about $7, 234.00. However, this option is not in keeping with the past practice of sharing part of the cost of tree removals onP rivate property with the affected owner. It should be noted that over the years the percentage of the costs paid by Grant -in -Aid has steadily decreased. 3. The City should Conti nue to pay a portion of the costs for removal of trees on private property. This places a heavier burden on the budget. If the recommended assessment policy for 1981 removals were adopted and extended to cover 1982 removals, the City's total cost is estimated to be $9,961.00. Option number two is recommended as it places the least burden on the City budget, a.nd is in keeping with the downward trend in Grants -in -Aid passed on to the property owner. - 3 1983 Program In addition to the options presented above, another option is avai labl-e for 1983. We shall call it option four, which reads: -2- ' 4. The City shall impose ' P e a special a 1 levy for the • shade trees on public or a removal of all diseased pr � va to 1 a lands. As allow ed levy is not restricted ed by MSA 18.023 • by general levy limits this imposed by State law, This option is recommended for the fol l owing reasons: a. A special 1 ev would ould be a more:. equitable method - • 'program than special assessmen °f financing a tree from tree di assessments, Everyone � n a communi . ti disease control, not just th ty benefits People with health ose that. have trees rem y trees especially benefit removed, yet they do not pa for from disease control and y ,t, n b • Special assessments for tree removal can be a re property owners. Assessments great burden on individual Off of Stat of $100-$300 per tree ar State. Grant -in -Aid n -Aid move makes a common. The cut- on every parcel has .Y• this more severe. A small much less financial impact.11 levy c • Special assessments• are difficult to administer because of annual hearings, billings and r � 80-6 required r required red notices . The 1980 ass q ed a pprox i ma to ly 60 man h es sment for project ours to prepare, d. Public opinion andeffici• ency of a tree disease � f a special levy were im program should improve i ort a Posed. People will be less r P P ceased trees since the reluctant t6 cost to the h City would remove them without • omeowners , thout adds ti oval e. For people who homestead their property, a Portion ofa s pec i al levy paid out of State funds through homestead credit. Assessments ntsareexcluded from homestead credit, The attached table is a c • made i n this comparison (and projection o f . s report. The �� the recommend 1983 projections are ba ons number of trees marked, and .Sed on a 50� increase in a 20% increase in the over the increases reflect the expected to head Costs. These trees without tendencies of the public to r • hesitation, and to re ui re diseased additional cost to them q re the City to remove the trees selves, at no The special levy required to finance the expected $69,896.00 costs for the project would be $3,15 per $10,000.00 of assessed valuation. A home with estimated market valuation of $709000.00 would pay an additional tax of $4x64. A portion of this additional tax would be offset by the homestead credit. _3_ TREES MARKED ' ASSESSMENT 1981 ESTIMIATED ASSESSMENT 1982 PROPOSED SPECIAL LEVY 1983 400 (Actual) 400 ,600 TREES REMOVED 242(Actual) , � ) 242 600 BY CITY CONTRACTOR , City Trees $4 213� 5 0 $ 56 $60,000(Contractor) ITY COST Boulevard Trees $1,815 $29178 $ 9,896 Overhead $69,028 $79234 $69,896 Private Trees $20,9910$259092 i ASSESSED Boulevard - COST _ Trees $ 1,815 2 $17 8 3 $229725$27,270 STATE AID � $3,430 @10..70 -- � t TOTAL COST $329183 s $ t $699896 x t COST OF AVERAGE �. TREE ON PRIVATE $ 146 $ 175$ "'�' �''� fi ROPERTY GRA PH I PiUMEA OF FREES LOST TO DUTCH ELm AND OAK WILT DISEASES 4� 40 N 35� W N 30C ti 0 c 25C s 2 200, 1 5 0( root 500 Y.� ? EAEAR13 60 1981 MEMORANDUM TO City Manager FROM : Finance Director RE write -Off of Uncollectible Paramedic Bills for 1981 DATE June 7, 1982 .At the May 20th Council Meeting, action on the above item was tabled pending a legal opinion on whether the city could publish the names of those who had not paid their paramedic bills. A letter from Pat Kelly regarding this matter is scheduled to be mailed today., Attached is the May 12th staff report which recommends that $4,827.60 of charges be written off as uncillectible . Also, attached is a May 19th memo regarding the use of a collection agency to obtain payments on paramedic bills. iM i a 4 MEMORANDUM TO City Manaqer _r FROM Finance Director RE Write -Off of Uncollectible Paramedic Bills for 1981 _ DATE : May 19, 1982 The City Council may want to reconsider the use of a col.1 ecti on agency to obtain payments on paramedic bills, This option wa.s presented to the Council on January 12, 1978 but at that time it was their preference to write off the accounts after a Conciliation Court judgment was received. The write-off of the 1981 paramedic bills could be delayed until a collection agency has had the opportunity to solicit payments. Also, unpaid 1982 bills could be referred to a collection agency on a trial basis. Recently I was contacted by a representative of Springer Collections who 1 i ves in Maplewood. This firm provides collection services for many firms including an ambulance service in Hastings. The cost of their services is equal to 40/ of the amount they collect. Their procedure involves mailina an initial notice to the debtor which is then followed p u by phone call s Garnishments and attachments of assets are done when possible. Attached is additional information regarding this firm. �GtORS 4g4 0 gsoC% C% it t •,y��lli�l i� A T �O+'v , 3 .Thomas Haggenmiller, Pres. Springer Collections COLLECTION AGENCIES serve an important function in the business community. All business and professional people of today realize this. Unfortunately, there are a large number of people who feel they do not have to pay their bills and will not pay them unless some sort of pressure is applied. The function of a collection agency is to apply that pressure in the form of salesmanship, via telephone, personal vis, it letters and other communications within the limits of the law. This is done in a way that is both human and decent to the debtor. vie provided b our collection agency is to resolve as many debts for you, as possible with A mayor .ser. c p y out the need of legal action and court proceedings. proven ourrselves as professionals in the field, by being the first collection service in the state We have p i n having been in continous operation since 1917. We have represented hospitals, banks, of Minnesota, and g commercial clients, s P schools, doctors, newspapers, dentists, department stores and oil companies, as well as attorneys. We will be happy to furnish references to you from our clients if you wish. i e is staffed with qualified, trained and specialized personnel to perform a quality job on your Our office accounts receivable. You may stop by our office building to see us if you like. COLLECTION SERVICES 1 } You may call our office for consultation on any credit or collection problem. 2 Legislative creditor representation & donations, Federal and State. 3 Nationwide bonded collection services and forwarding of your accounts. • t includes mail returns, no telephones, asset checks, moves out of state, etc. 4) Skip tracing of your debtors, that remittance to you of our collection proceeds check. 5) 30 day re Y Y 6) All accounts are worked on a commission basis only. NO COLLECTION. NO CHARGE. worked, medical commercial, professional, retail, bad checks, etc. 7) All types of collection accounts are wo , bpringer Collectl'on5 �erUmq laltbfultv,511're 1017 772-3456 839 EAST SEVENTH STREET - ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55106 ' THOMAS Jo HAGGENMILLER A BRIEF HISTORY OF SPRINGER COLLECTIONS Springer Mercantile, as it was called, was started in 17, Minnesota's first collection service. About forty years later a company named Mercury Service Bureau combined with Springer Mercantile. The company was run by both Cole Costello and Bill Hemp sch. They off iced in the Pioneer Building, downtown St. Paul, most of that time. During the late sixties, Tom Haggenmiller, the present owner, manager, worked for a very large competitor. He worked his way up from the bottom to be a manager at Credit Managers Service, one of the largest in the UnJ ted States. He then quit and started on his own out of his home, and shortly thereafter bought Springer Mercury Company as it was then called. This was the beginning of 1970. The name was shortened to Springer Collections and mored to the east side of St. Paul in an area where 70,000 people work within a one mile radius. In 1976 we acquired Griffin Adjustments, a thirty year old collection q � . company of officing in on University Avenue. Word of mouth from our g clients has been our best selling tool for new accounts, and Springer Collections has consistently collected a higher percent - page - 2 - age. of claims than our competition, we have many credit grantor customers to substantiate this fact. We are members of the Better Business Bureau of Minnesota, The American Collection Association and the Minnesota Association of Collectors. We have an excellent banking reference with e Bank of St . Paul Northwestern Stat , down the street from us on Minnehaha and East Seventh Streeto you may have and look forward to doing We welcome any questions � y business with you. Thank you, Nomas J. aggenmi ler Owner -Manager l r r MEMORANDUM Action by Coun,_-. To City Manager Finance Director �ndor � E �....�__.__....�.�.....�.. FROM: RE Write -Off of Uncollectible Paramedic Bills for 1981 : IF, od-i DATE: May 12, 1982 Re j eCtea__ Date t PROPOSAL totaling be written off as being It is roposed that paramedic bills t g P uncollectible. BACKGROUND .The following is a summary of the transactions for paramedic services provided in 1981 compared to 1980: 1981 1980 35 ,232 37,593 Service charges Conciliation Court filing fees 433 348 Total billed $35,665 $37,941 Service char paid 309607 329074 charges Court fees aid 150 141 p Hardship cancellations 80 128. Uncollectible balance $45828 $ 5,598 nd 85% of .the service charges billed The service charges paid represent 87/ a respectively* This represents a significant improvement for 1981 and 1980, over the 51/ i collection rate that the City had n 1975 and 1976. A total of 94 bills were filed i n Conciliation Court for paramedic services provided in 1981. Of this number 52 bills were paid. (However, 21 of these faded to pay a the Conciliation Court filing fee). The uncollectible amounts to be written off are itemized in Exhibits A and B. • in of bills unpaid after court action. Exhibit B is a Exhibit t A i s a listing st g listing op f unpaid bills that have not been processed through court because of different reasons such as bankruptcy, death, moved without leaving a • balances of small amounts ($10 or less). . forwarding address, and unpaidRamsey Co." are uncollectible because only bills for y Bills noted .not Ramsey illation Court. residents can be processed through our local Conc • County ken to the Conciliation Court Bills for non-residents would have to be to within the County they reside* RECOMMENDATION of char. es itemized on Exhibits A and It is recommended that the $4,827.609 B be -written off as uncollectible. NAME & ADDRESS Mark A. Thalhuber 1247 Century #9 Maplewood, MN 55119 Marion L. Matzke 1901 Maryland St Paul, MN 55119 Sheldon H. Anderson 1361 'Belmont Lane Maplewood, MN 55109 Sheldon H. Anderson 1361 E. Belmont Maplewood, MN 55109 Sheldon H. Anderson 1361 E. Belmont Maplewood, MN 55119 Margaret J. Coleman 2364 Lond in Lane Maplewood, MN 55119 Louis R. Bacigalupo 1854 Beebe #208 Maplewood, MN 55109 Char les Anderson 1481 Ripley St. Maplewood, MN 55109 FOR: Michelle J. Anderson Patrick J. McBride 1700 McMenemy Maplewood, MN 55117 Sheldon H. Anderson 1361 Belmont Lane Maplewood, MN 55109 Mitchell W. Ott 1076. Agate #206 St. Paul, MN 55117 Sheldon H. Anderson 1361 Belmont Lane Maplewood, MN 55109 Irene F. Dillon 1373 Kohlman Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 Exhibit A Page 1 of 5 DATE OF RUN AMOUNT CASE NO, 11/23/80 75.00 014.077 1/3/81 83.00 100129 1/5/81 83.00 100202 1/19/81 40.00 100674 1/20/81 8 0.00 100682 1/24/81 123.00 100862 1/27/81 43.00 100956 1/28/81 3.00 100993 1/29/81 43.00 101008 2/3/81 14.00 101233 3/1/81 3.00 101851 2/23/81 14.00 _ 102060 3/2/81 3.00 102321 Exhibit A • Page 2 of 5 NAME & ADDRESS DATE OF RIJN AMOUNT CASE NO. John W. Collins 2425 E. Larpenteur #304 Maplewood, MN 55109 3/22/81 3.00 103263 Lydia Gar cia 1821 English #11 Maplewood, MN 55109 ' FOR: A. S. Dupree Garcia .4/9/81 5.00 -.. 104077 Judith Hughes 1635 Marshall St. Paul, MN 55104 FOR: Tracey L. Hughes 4/12/81 5.00 104209A Nancy Ruth Palmer 2080 Mississippi #101 Maplewood, MN 55117 4/23/81 5.00 104692 Evelyn Kamp f er 1816 Beebe Rd. #206 Maplewood, MN 55109 4/26/81 2.00 104806 Joseph Peter Palmer i 1893 Kennard Maplewood, MN 55109 5/2/81 45.00 105093 Harold L. Gilpin 1533 E . Lark Maplewood, MN 55109 P 5/7/81 35.00 105290 Robert Leon Wynn 965 Forrest St. Paul, MN 55106 5/7/81 45.00 105294 Pat Molitor 1281 Hazelwood St, Paul, MN 55109 FOR: Jason Molitor 5/8/81 5.00 105338 John Richard Hansen; 1138 Forest St. Paul , MN 55106 5/10/81 45.00 105421 Kathleen L. O'Connor 1978 Adolphus Maplewood, MN 55117 5/12/81 5.00 105520 Mary Bothwell 2006 Prosperity Maplewood, MN 55109 FOR: Nancy K. Bothwell 5/15/81 5.00 105637 Bruce W. Doris 2360 Edgerton Vadnais Hts., MN 55110 5/15/81 5.00 105663 Exhibit A t Page 3 of 5 NAME & ADDRESS DATE OF RUN AMOUNT CASE NO iia ur e a n Brown 1618 - 9th Street White Bear Lake, MN 55110 5/22/81 5.00 105931 FOR: Heidi A. Brown Louis Wm. Boykin 1286 Hazelwood #107- St Paul MN 55106 6/1/81 45.00 106345 Deborah Gockowski 90 Big Circle Drive Little Canada MN 55117 6/2/81 5.00 106396 Alice M. Kr anich 364 Maple Street St. Paul MN 55106 6/6/81 45.00 106601 Madeline Pe l oqu in 1247 N. Century #2 Maplewood, MN 55119 FOR: Steven G. Peloquin 6/12/81 45.00 106860 Valerie D. Seals 2 332 Dor land Place Maplewood, MN 55109 P 6/16/81 45.00 107036 David J. Brunell 2 351 - 17th Ave. E0 No. St. Paul MN 55109 7/4/81 85.00 107968 Rodney A. Beseman 218.0 E. Lydia a lewood MN 55109 M p 5 7/6/81 5.00 108064 Gregory B. Ross 84 McClelland Maplewood, MN 55119 7/9/81 45.00 108204 Karl A. Anderson 2590 Germain Ma lewood MN 55109 p 7/9/81 45.00 108206 Florence M. Jones 765- W. Terrace Drive R Bevil le, MN 55113 o 7/12/81 13 0.00 108343 Gerald E. Dittel 400 N. McCarrons Blvd. Roseville MN 55113 7/12/81 45.00 10835 7 Barbara Johnson '` 2175 German - Maplewood, MN 5.5109 FOR • Erick J. To l le f s on 7/16/81 45.00 108548 Exh ib it A .4 of 5 NAME & ADDRESS DATE OF RUN AMOUNT CASE N0. M. R. Stau f f enecker 336 Lab,ore Road Little Canada, MN 55117 7/17/81 45.00 108579 Robert Mitchell 1717 Florence .White Bear Lake, MN 55110 FOR: Lynn Marie Mitchell 7/27/81 45.00 109089 Richa-rd Fitch 1689 Beebe Road No. St. Paul, MN 55109 FOR: Lori Marie Fitch 8/7/81 5.00 109620 Michael P. Igo 366 Co. Rd. F White Bear Lake, MN 55110 8/9/81 45.00 109678 Vernon St ibb ins 615 Reaney 1 St, Paul MN 55106 8/15 /81 45.00 110005 Carol Y. Patterson 615 Reaney St . Pau 1, MN 55106 8/15/81 45.00 110005A Richard A. Pobewils 1627 Hammond Road White Bear Lake, MN 55110 9/3/81 5.00 110846 Dotti Lehmann 2053 Porsperity Maplewood, MN 55109 FOR: Richard A. Lehmann 9/29/81 45.00 111902 .Herschel T. Bauer 215 So. Crestview Maplewood, MN 55119 10/4/81 10.00 112 075 Robert Russell 120 W. Iowa St. Paul MN 55117 10/4/81 5.00 112084 Jody Kim Leyde 286 Arlington St. Paul MN 55101 10/9/81 85.00 112266 Sidney H. Holmes 1742 Duluth Ma lewood , MN 55109 p 10/22/81 85.00 _ 112 791 Rick F. Messin -_ 992 Como Avenue St. Paul MN 55103 10/26/81 5.00 112936 Jack E. Hendrickson 1909 E. Co. Rd. B Ma lewood� MN 55109 P 11/1/81 45.00 113227 Exh ib i t A Page 5 of 5 NAME & ADDRIES S DATE OFR AMOUNT CASE NO. Ruth Brandville 1443 E. Sandhurst Maplewood, MN 55109 p � 11/2/81 85.00 113284 Steven J. MacDonald 2421 N, lst- Street No . Ste Paul, MN 55109 11/14/81 85.00 113755 Kim Peterson 1145 University #1 St. Paul, MN 55104 11/19/81 85.00 114 004 Ervin Mohs 1985 Barclay Maplewood, MN 55109 12/3/81 85.00 114534 FOR: Jessica c A. Mohs Patricia Homich _ 1347 E. Skillman Maplewood, MN 55109 12/5/81 45.00 114594 FOR: Lisa L. Homich Donna 14. Ver ha a gh ' 2018 Hazelwood iotaP lewood MN 55109 12/7/81 85.00 114675 Deborah J. Langer 1854 Beebe Rd, #306 Maplewood, MN 55 109 12/9/81 45.40 114 744 Debra Peterson 1480 Lark _ Maplewood, MN 55109 12/22/81 5..00 115 260 • Emily J, Peterson FOR: Emi y Jody Hunt _ 1821 English #17 Maplewood, MN 55109 12/29/81 45.00 1155 24 FOR: Casey Lee Hunt . Steven C. Erickson 1637 Prosperity St. Paul, MN 55106 1 2./29/81. 5.00 115537 $ 2,492.00 Exhibit B Page 1 of 5 NAMEI& ADDRESS DATE OF RUN AMOUNT CASE NO. EXPLANATION Alan G. Bailles 5349 Ander lie Lane White Bear Lake, MN 55110 40.00 1001 Re t' d . Ma it FOR:01/03/8138 Gina Ann Ba it le s Maisie 0. Woodbury $80.00 billed* 348 E . Co. Rd, B Ma lewood , MN 55109 P 01/03/81 35.00 100140 MA pd. . $45.00 . Scott C o ' Timpane 980 Pipers Drive St. Paul, MN 55112 01/28/81 40..00 100966 Ret'd. Mail Mai Lo billed 1490 E. Co. Rd. B, #201$80.00 55109 01/29/81 35.00 101020 MA pd. $45-00 Maplewood, MN Renee M. Haller 155 E. Little Canada #109 02/10/81 40.00 101522 Ret ' d Mail St. Paul, MN 55117 Linda L. Howe $80.00 billed 2 321 Pond Avenue 55119 02 21/81 / 35.00 101949 MA pd. $45.00 Ma lewood , MN P $80.00 billed Axel E. Anderson edicare/MA- Medicare/MA- 2040 White Bear Avenue 2000 03/03/81 35.00 102360 Pd. $45.00^ Maplewood, MN 55109 p Gayle -M. Turenne 284 E. Roel ler MN 55118 03/06/81 40.00 102506 Not Ramsey Co. West St. Paul, $80.00 billed Lena Gaetke Medicare/MA 2000 White Bear Avenue 03/19/81 3 5:.00 103093 Pd . $45.00* Ma lewood , MN 55109 P Rudolph M. Aguilar 586 Holly #3 03/21/81 40.00 103191 Ret' d. Mail St. . Paul, MN 55102 Larry Lee Eishen 6498 Uppet 54th St . No 03/30/81 40.00 103665 Not Ramsey Co. akdale MN 55109 0, Stephen M. Raduny 220 Grenadier 04 04/81 / 80.00 103886 Not Ramsey Co. Oakdale, MN 55119 Oliver VanAlstine 14420 - 90th St. So* _ Hastings, MN 55033 04/13/81 80.00 104250'` Not Ramsey Co. FOR: Kevin G. VanAlstine James G. Holm 345 Univ. - Un. Gospel Miss 04/20/81 40.00 104571 Ret' d . Mail St. Paul, MN 55101 *On medical assistance cases we can only g n1 charge what MA allows --balance has to be written off . 0n medical assistance cases we can only charge what MA allows --balance has to be written off . Exhibit B Page 2 of 5 NAME & ADDRESS DATE OF RUN __--____._,_..._........_ AMOUNT CASE NO. EXPLANATION Michael J. Montero 6805N. 5th Street Oakdale, MN 55109 05/06/81 40.00 105248 Not Ramsey Co . Laurie Lynn North 530 Florence Mahtomedi , MN 55115 05/10/81 40.00 105452 Not Ramsey Co. Harold E. Cha pa loney 345 Univ. - Un. Gospel Miss. St. Paul, MN 55101 05/2'0/81 40.00 105873 Ret d Mail f $80:00 bille. Elsie. V. Englin Medicare /MA 190.0 E. Sherren Ma lewood , MN 55109 P 05/13/81 35.00 105528 Pd. $45.00 Christine Valturra 17 Grotto St. Paul MN 55104 06/08/81 80.00 106679 Ret' d. Mail Kevin Scott Walker 450 Nash Road Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54494 06/13/81 40.00 106921 Not Ramsey Co. Mary C. Carlson 3208 Diamond 8 Terrace St. Anthony, MN 55421 06/18/81 80.00 107147 Ret t d . Mail Luana M. MacCar ter 4212 E. Robert E. Lee St. Phoenix , AZ 85 032 06/30/81 80.00 107 717 Not Ramsey Co. Hazel V. Thro $80.00 billed .2005 Ide #203 Medicare/MA Maplewood, MN 55109 06/04/81 35.00 106486 pd . $45.00^ William H. Schmidt 373 Winthrop St, Paul MN 55119 07/14/81 40.00 108447 Ret' d . Mail Alice Irene Grant Billed $80.00 2413 Dolphin P - payment rec' d . Maplewood, MN 55119 P � 07/16/81 25.60 108541 - over MA a 1 lowab It 0n medical assistance cases we can only charge what MA allows --balance has to be written off . Exhibit B Page 3 of 5 NAME & ADDRESS DATE OF RUN AMOUNT CASE, NO. EXPLANATION Patricia A. St e ttner 6173 Carmen Ave, E. A Inver Grove Hts . , MN 55075 07/18/81 80.00 108635 Not Ramsey Co. Walter M. Niedero ski Billed $80.00 269.1 Geranium Medicare allowed Ma lewood , MN 55119 P 07/29/81 12.00 109166 only 68.00.* Janet Kay Flynn 426 Marshall St. Paul, MN 55 102 08/01/81 40.00 109318- Ret' d. Mail Billed $80.0 Kathleen M,* Peterson M/A allowed and Rd. B ��210 15.12E. Co. R Maplewood, MN 55109 08/04/81 35.00 10945 7 paid $45.0.0* ' Previous bills Sheldon H. Anderson in court .filed 1361-E. Belmont Maplewood, MN 55109 08/16/81 80.00 110052 never paid. Charles W. Haines 410-B So. McKnight #15A Maplewood, MN 55119 08/19/81 40.00 110214 Bankruptcy. Previous bills Sheldon. H. Anderson filed in court 1361 E. Belmont Maplewood,MN 55109 08/21/81 80.00 1,10268 never paid. Nan Louise Root 1881 Furness #111 Maplewood, MN 55109 08/28/81 80.00 11.0608 � Ret d. Mail Billed $80 M/A Candy J. Thomas allowed and paid Rd ��131 1854 Beebe . , Maplewood, MN 55109 06/10/81 40.00 106772 $45%+court fee Billed $80 M/A Tirzah Koenke allowed and paid 1900 E. Sh erren Maplewood, MN 55109 Ma , p 08/25/81 35.00 110459 $45.00%1. Nadia BradburyGAMC case - Billed $40 M/A 896 E. 6th Street St. Paul,' ' MN 55106 09/01/81 5.00 110759 paid $35.00 David Leroy McKay 2001 Clark d MN 55117 Maplewood, 09/08/81 40.00 111032 MSA rejected Stephen R. Ander t GAMC case - Billed $40 M/A 2113 McMenemy Maplewood, MN 55117 09/09/81 5.00 111082_ paid $35.00 Carol Jean Laducer _ Arch Apt. A 143 E . p 1 MN 55101 St. Paul, 09/21/81 40.00 �� 111601 Ret' d . Mail GAMC case - Lillian F. Dehaven Billed $40 M/A 2593 Mayer Lane 09/28/81 5.00 111852 paid $35.00 Maplewood, MN 55119 *On medical assistance/medicare cases we can only charge what-MA or medicare allows-- balance has to be written off* *On medical assistance/medicare cases we can only charge what MA or medicare allows -- balance has to be written off. Exhibi t. B Page 4 of 5 NAME & ADDRESS DATE OF RUN AMOUNT CASE NO. EXPLANATION Mary Jane Welch 4701 - 81st Ave N Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 10/23/81 40.00 .112848 Not Ramsey Co. Wallace Vanderhewel $80.00 billed 1900 Sherp en Medicare /MA Maplewood, .MN I 55109 10/24/81 12.00 112874 Pd. $68.00%, Marcus Monn $.80.00 billed 2000 White Bear Avenue Medicare/MA Maplewood, MN 55109 09/21/81 12.00 111594 Pd. $68.00* Gladys Bilderbach $120.00 billed 1841 Myrtle Medicare paid Maplewood, MN 55109 10/17/81 75.00 112610 $45.00%' Herschel T. Bauer $80.00 billed 215 So. Crestview Medicare/MA Ma lewoud� MN 55119 P 10/20/81 12.00 112 732 Pd, $68.00* Deborah J. Valentine $80.00 billed 2 349 - 12th Ave. No MA paid $45.00* No. St. Paul, MN 55109 11/19/81 35.00 113987 Roy Mullen Pine Villa Apt. 115 Menahga , MN 56464 11/23/81 40.00 114128 Not Ramsey Co. Kerry Go Conrad 689 Cimarron Lake Elmo, MN 55042 11/24/81 20,00 114166 Not . Ramsey Co. George Eiley Clark 6819 - llth St. N. Oakdale, MN 55119 11/28/81 40.00 114342 Not Ramsey Co. Gary John Pribnow 14166 Goodview Avenue N. Hugo, MN 55038 11/29/81 10.00 114350 Not Ramsey Co. Pawl K. Hendrickson Route 1 Downing, WI 54734 11/29/81 20.00 114381A Not Ramsey Co. Charles W. Haines $80.00 billed 410 So. McKnight -B#15 _ MA paid $45.00* Maplewood, MN 55119 12/5/81 35.00 1145'92 ; Anita L. Belland 1923 E. County Rd. B Maplewood, MN 55109 12/20/81 40.00 115200 Re t' d . Mail *On medical assistance/medicare cases we can only charge what MA or medicare allows -- balance has to be written off. r NAME & ADDRE S S FLORENCE LEVERTY 1 1900 E. Sherren Avenue 'Maplewood, MN 55109 Daniel A.. Terry 6462- .40th Street N. Oakdale, SIN 55119 Lawrence A. Davidson 963 Beech Street St. Paul, MN 55106 Edward G. Saum 2318 Case Maplewood ,$ MN 55119 Sandra Grunz 2414 Castle Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 FOR Jonathan M. Grunz DATE OF RUN 12/21/81 12/27/81 12/29/81 txn1D1L b Page 5 of 5 AMOUNT CASE NO. EXPLANATION $80.00 billed Medicare /MA 12.00 115220 Pd. $68.00% 40.00 07/19/81 5,00 09/03/81 40.00 $ 2,335.60 1.15437 115510 108688 110843 Not Ramsey Co. Re t' d Mail Under $10.00 Pending MA pay- ment MEMORANDUM TO City Manager FROM Finance Director RE Writ 1981 • Write-off of Uncollectible Paramedic Bills for DATE June 7, 1982 ' Meeting, act -ion on the above item At the May 20th Council Meeti g, could ed pending a legal opinion on whether the city was tabl p g e of those Who had not paid their paramedic publish the 'names • from Pat Kelly regarding this matter is bills. A letter r scheduled to be mailed today. Attached is the May 12th staff report which recommends that Y $4+ 827.60 of charges be written off as uncillectible. Also,• a May 19th memo regarding the use of a collection attached is Y agency enc to obtain payments on paramedic bills. MEMORANDUM TO City Manager i 0.� FROM Finance Director �' RE Write-off of Uncollectible Paramedic Bilis for 1981 DATE May 19, 1982 The City Counci 1 .ray want . to reconsider the use of a collection ane cy to obtain payments on paramedic bills This option was resented • p to the Council on January 12, 1978 but at that time it was theirreference p to write off the accounts after a Conciliation Court judgment was received. The write-off of the 1981 paramedic bills could be delayed until a collection agency has had the opportunityto solicit payments. Also, unpaid 1982 bills could be referred to a collection aenc on a trial basis. 4 Y Recently I was contacted by a representative of Springer Collections who lives in Maplewood. This firm provides col 1 ecti on services for many firms including an ambulance service in Hasti nas. The cost of their services is equal to 40% of the amount the collect. Their Y procedure involves mai 1 i na an initial notice. to the debtor which is then followed up by phone calls. Garnishments and attachments of assets are done when possible. Attached is additional information renardi nQ this firm. S&Toss 4:0 O 1 V O s s WQOM f10+ Thomas Haggenmiller, Pres. Springer Collections COLLECTION AGENCIES serve an important function in the business community. Al business and professional people of today realize this. Unfortunately, there are a large number of people who feel they do not have to pay their bills and will not pay them unless some sort of pressure is applied The function of a collection agency is to apply that pressure in the form of salesmanship, via telephonE personal visit letters and other communications within the limits of the law. This is done in a way that i both human and decent to the debtor. A major service provided by our collection agency is to resolve as. many debts for you, as possible wit out the need of legal action and court proceedings. We have proven ourrselves as professionals in the field, by being the first collection service in the stat of Minnesota, and having been in continous operation since 1917. We have represented hospitals, bank: commercial clients schools, doctors, newspapers, dentists, department stores and oil companies, as we c � P as attorneys. We will be happy to furnish references to you from our clients if you wish. Our office is staffed with qualified, trained and specialized personnel to perform a quality job on yoL accounts receivable. You may stop by our office building to see us if you like. COLLECTION SERVICES 1) You may call our office for consultation on any credit or collection problem. 2) Legislative creditor representation &donations, Federal and State. 3) Nationwide bonded collection services and forwarding of your accounts. 4) Skip tracing of your debtors, that includes mail returns, no telephones, asset checks, moves out of state, 5) 30 day remittance to you of your collection proceeds check. S) All accounts are worked on a commission basis only. NO COLLECTION. NO CHARGE. 7) YP All types of collection accounts are worked, medical, commercial, professional, retail, bad checks, etc 6pringer Collect'on� �e��Umq �a�ti�fully 5i�tce 1017 772-3456 1O� 839 EAST SEVENTH STREET - ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55106! THOMAS Jo HAGGENMIR A BRIEF HISTORY OP SPRINGER C 0 CTI 011 c Spren •ger Mercantile, as it was called, was started in 1917, Minnesota Is f lrst collection service. About forty years later a company named Mercury Service Bureau combined with Springer r company was run by both Cole Costello and Me�cantlle. The p y • The off iced in the Pioneer Building, downtown B111 Hempsch. y St. Paul, most of that time. During the late sixties, Tom • manager, worked for a very large iia ggennzller, the present owner, g , competitor. He worked his way up from the bottom to be a managed • e of the largest in the United Stat at Credit Managers Service, on g • n his own out of his home, and shortly He then quit and started o • Company as it was then called,� thereafter bought Springer Mercury p y This was the beginning innin of 1970. The name was shortened to • S rin e r Collections and moved to the east side of St. Paul in a P g area where 701000 people wo rk within a one mile radius. In 1976 •stments we acquired Griffin Adju , a thirty year old collection, company offlcing on University Avenue* Word of mouth from our clients has been our best selling tool for new accounts, and • consistent) collected a higher percent Springer Collections has y pa ge - 2 - age of claims than our competition, we have many credit grantor customers to substantiate this fact. We are members of the Better Business Bureau of Minnesota, The American Collection Association and the Minnesota Association of Collectors. We have an excellent banking reference with Northwestern State Bank of St. Paul, down the street from us on Minnehaha and East Seventh Street. We welcome any questions you may have and look forward to doing business with you. Thank you, Nomas J,,# ggenmi ler � Owner -Manager .. ..._.....�✓'4x7.w;4i. A". W'�iJig1.,....<.+A4+..:i. �.. �rLi.:.W�r.ti�xv-.'iJ.!Ki 3'+Ji:..y<:i.'xw:4WMx Y'�f.-. �T��I. _ y YS'r �a'�' J s MEMORANDUM TOCity Manager 4 Action by Council: FROM: Finance Director , C RE Write -Off of Un End ors E d- , ,.�___.____ col l ecti bl a Paramedic Bills for 1981 Ijodi DATE : May 12 , 1982 v �---- ............ Date PROPOSAL It is proposed that paramedic bills totaling n • . g $4,827.60 be written off as being uncollectible. 9 BACKGROUND The following is a summary of the transactions f • in 1981 or paramedic services provided compared to 1980 Service char g es 1981 1980 35,232 379593 Concil iation Court fit ing fees 433 348 Total billed $35,665 $379941 Service charges paid 309607 07 32,074 Court fees paid 150 141 Hardship cancellations 80 128 Uncollectible, balance $ 4 828 59 s $ 5 � 8 The service charges aid represent 87/ p p and 85/ of • the service charges billed ed .for 1981 and 19809 respectively. This represents a significant improvement provement over the 51% collection ton rate that the City had i n - 1975 and 1976. A total of 94 bills were filed in Conciliation Court f ' or paramedic services provided in 1981. Of this number 52 bills l s were aid.(However,2. p 1 of these failed to pay the Conciliation Court filing fee). The uncollectible amounts to be written off are itemized i n Exhibits An a d B. Exhibit A is a listing of bills unpaid after court action. Exhibit B is a listing of unpaid bills that have not been processed through . p ouQh court because of different reasons such as bankruptcy, death, moved without leavin a forwarding address and n 9 g unpaid balances of small amounts ($l0 or less). Bills noted "not Ramsey Co." are uncollectible because onlybills l s f r o Ramsey County residents can be processed through our local Conciliation Court. Bills for non-residents would have to be taken to the Conciliation Court within the County they reside. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the $4,,827,.60 of charges itemized on Exhibits A and B be written off as uncollectible. Exhibit A Page 1 of 5 f t NAME & ADDRESS DATE OF RUN AMOUNT CASE NO, Mark A. Thalhuber 1247 Century #9 Maplewood, MN 55119 Marion L. Matzke 1901. Maryland St. Paul, MN 55119 Sheldon H. Anderson 1361 Belmont Lane Maplewood, MN 55109 Sheldon H. Anderson 1361 E. Belmont Maplewood, MN 55109 Sheldon H. Anderson 1361 E Belmont Maplewood, MN 55119 Margaret J. Coleman 2364 Lon d in Lane Maplewood, MN 55119 Louis R. Bacigalupo 1854 Beebe #208 Maplewood, MN 55109 Charles Anderson 1481 Ripley St. Maplewood, MN 55109 FOR Michelle J. Anderson Patrick J., McBride 1700 McMenemy Maplewood, MN 55117 Sheldon H. Anderson 1361 Belmont Lane Maplewood, MN 55109 Mitchell W. Ott 1.076 Agate #206 St, Paul, MN 55117 Sheldon H Anderson 1361 Belmont Lane Maplewood, MN 55109 Irene F0 Dillon 1373 Kohlman Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 11/23/80 75.00 014077 1/3/81 83.00 100129 1/5/81 83.00 100202 1/19/81 40.00 100674 1/20/81 80.00 100682 1/24/81 123.00 100862 1/27/81 43.00 100956 1/28/81 3.00 100993 1/29/81 43.00 101008 2/3/81 14.00 101233 3/1/81 3.00 101851 2/23/81 14.00 102060 3/2/81 3.00 102321 ■ Ilk .NAME & ADDRESS John W. Collins DATE OF 8I1AI AMOUNT Exhibit A Page 2 o f 5 CASE N0,, 2425 Eo Larpenteur #304 Maplewood, MN 55109 3/22/81 3.00 103263 Lydia Garcia 1821 English #11 Maplewood, MN 55109 FOR: A. S. Dupree Garcia 4/9/81 5.00 1.04077 Judith Hughes 1635 Marshall St , Paul, MN 55104 FOR: Tracey L. Hughes 4/12/81 / /81 5.00 1042 Q 9A Nancy Ruth Palmer 2080 Mississippi #101 Maplewood, MN 55117 . 4/23/81 5.00 104692 Evelyn Kampfer 1816 Beebe Rd. #206 Maplewood, MN 55109 4/26/81 / .6/81 2.00 104806 Joseph Peter Palmer 1893 Kennard Maplewood, MN 55109 5/2/81 45.00 105 093 Harold L. Gilpin 1533 E. Lark .Maplewood, MN 55109 5/7/81 35.00 105290 Robert Leon Wynn 965 Forrest St . Paul, MN 55106 5/7/81 45.00 105294 Pat Molitor 1281 Hazelwood St, Pauls MN 55109 FOR: Jason Molitor 518/81 5.0.0 105338 John Richard Hansen 1138 Forest St, Paul, MN 55106 5/10/81 45.00 105421 Kathleen L. O'Connor 1978 Adolphus Maplewood, MN 55117 5/12/81 5.00 105520 Mary Bothwell 2006 Prosperity Maplewood, MN 55109 FOR: Nancy K. Bothwell - 5 /15/81 5.00 - 105637 Bruce W. Doris 2360 Edgerton Vadna is Hts . , MN 55110 5/15/81 5.00 105663 NAME & ADDRESS La ur e a n Brown 1618 - 9th Street White Bear Lake, MN 55110 FOR: Heidi A. Brown Louis Wm. Boykin 1286 Hazelwood #107 St. Paul, MN 55106 Deborah Gockow sk i 94 gig Circle Drive Little Canada, MN 55117 Alice 14, Kr anich 364 Maple Street St. Paul, MN 55106 Madeline Peloquin .1247 N, Century #2 Maplewood, MN 55119 FOR Steven G. Peloquin Valerie D. Seals 2332 Dorland Place Maplewood, MN 55109 David J. Brunel l 2351 - 17th Ave. E. No. St. Paul, MN 55109 .Rodney A. Beseman 2180 E. Lydia Maplewood, MN 55109 Gregory B. Ross 84 McClelland Maplewood, MN 55119 .Karl A. Anderson 2590 Germain Maplewood, MN 55109 Florence M. Jones 765 W. Terrace Drive Roseville, MN 55113 Gerald E. Dittel 400 N. McCarrons Blvd. Roseville, MN 55113 Barbara Johnson 2175 German Maplewood, MN 55109 FOR: Erick Jo Tollef son DATE OF RUN 5/22/81 6/1/81 6/2/81 6/6/81 6/12/81 6/16/81 7/4/81 7/6/81 7/9/81 7/9/81 7/12/81 7/16/81 AMOUNT 5.00 45.00 5.00 45.00 45.00 45,00 85.00 5,00 45.00 45.00 130.00 45.00 45.00 Exhibit A Page 3 of 5 CASE NO. 105931 106345 106396 106601 106860 107036 107968 108064 108204 108206 108343 108357 108548 Exhibit A 4 of 5 DATE OF RUN AMOUNT -_ CASE. NO. ADDRESS NAME & ADD M. R. Stauffenecker 108579 Labore Road 3.36 55117 7/17/8 1 45,00 Little Canada, MN Robert Mitchell 1717 Florence White Bear Lakes MN 55110 7/27/81 45.00 89 109089 FOR: Lynn Marie Mitchell Richard Fitch 1689 Beebe Road No.St . Paul , MN 55109 8/ 7/81 5.00 10962 0 . Lori Marie Fitch FOR: Michael P. Igo 1 09678 366 Co. Rd, F Lakes MN 55110 8/9/81 45.00 White Bear Vernon Stibbins 11 0005 6 15 Reaney 8/15/81 45.00 St. Paul, MN 55106 Carol Y. Patterson 11 0005A 615 Reaney 8/15/81 45,00 St . Pauls MN 55106 Richard A. Pobewil s Hammond Road 1627 H 55110 9/3/81 5.00110846 White Bear Lakes MN Dotti Lehmann 2053 Por sper ity od � 55109 Maplewood 9/29/81 45,Q0 .111902 FOR: Richard A, Lehmann Herschel T. Bauer 112 075 So. . Crestview 215 S 10/4/81 10.00 Maplewood, MN 55119 Robert Russell 1 12 Q84 120 W. Iowa 10/4/81 5.00 St. Paul , MN 55 117 Jody Kim Leyde 112266 286 Arlington10/9/81 85.00 St. Paul) MN 55101 Sidney H. Holmes 112 791 174 2 Duluth 10/22/81 85.00 Maplewood, MN 55109 _ Rick F. Messin 11 2936 99 2 Como Avenue 10/26/81 5,pp St. Pauls MN 55103 Jack E. Hendrickson 1132 2 7 1909 E. Co. Rd . B 11/1/81 45.00 Maplewood, MN 55109 Exhibi t A a .. Page 5 of 5 WAVE & ADDRIES S DATE OF RUN ..AMOUNT CASE N0. Ruth Brandville .1443 E.. Sandhurst Maplewood, MN 55109 11/2/81 85.00 113284 Steven J. MacDonald 2421 N. 1st Street No. . � StPaul MN 55109 11/14/81 85. p0 113755 Kim Peterson 1145 University #1 55104 11/19/81 85.00 114004 Paul, MN St . Pa , Ervin Mohs 1985 Barclay Maplewood, MN 55109 12/3/81 85.00 114534 • FOR. Jessica A. Mohs Patricia Homich 1347 E. Skillman Maplewood, MN 55109 12/5/81 45.0 0 114594 FOR: Lisa L. Homich Donna M. Verhaagh 2018 Hazelwood mapleod, MN 55109 .w o 12/7/81 85.00 114675 Deborah Jo Langer 1854 Beebe Rd* #306 12/9/81 45.00 1147 44 Maplewood, MN 55109 Debra Peterson 1480 Lark Maplewood, MN 55109 12/22/81 5.00 115260 Emil J. Peterson FOR: y Jody Hunt 1821 English #17 Maplewood, MN 55109 12 /29 / 81 45.00 115524 • Case Lee Hunt FOR: FOy Steven C. Erickson 1637 Prosperity St. Paul NN 55106 12 /29/81 5 • 04 115537 $ 23,492,00 Exhibit B .NAME & ADDRESS Alan G. Ba i l l e s DAT E OF RUN AMOUNT CASE NO. Page 1 of 5 EXPLANATION 5349 Ander lie Lane White Bear Lake, MN 55110 ` FOR : Gina Ann Ba i 11 e s 01/03/81 40.00 100138 Ret'd, . Mai l Maisie 0. Woodbury 348 E. Co. Rd, B Maplewood, MN 55109$80.00 01/03/81 35.00 looi4o bill MA d p . $45. Scott C. Timpane 980 Piper Drive St.. Paul, MN 55112 . 0128 / %81 40.00 100966 Ret'd. . Mail Mai Lo 1490 E. Co. Rd. B, #201 Maplewood, MN 55109 01/29/81 35.00 10 .1.020 $80."00 bill( MA d , p $45.( Renee M. Haller 155 E. Little Canada #109 St . Paul, MN 55117 02/10/81 40.00 101522 Ret'd . Mail Linda L. Howe 2 321 Pond Avenue .Maplewood, MN 55119$80.00 02%21/81 35.00 101949 bills MAd , p $45,C Axel E. Anderson 2000 White Bear Avenue $80.00 bille . Maplewood, MN 55109 03/03/81 35.00 102360 Medicare /MA Pd, $45.00* Gayle M. Tur enne .284 E . Roe l l er West St. Paul, MN 551I8 03/06/81 / 40,00 102506 Not Ramsey C, w -Lena Gaetke 2000 White Bear Avenue $80.00 bil lei Maplewood, MN 55109 03 / 19 /81 35.00 103 093 Medicare/MA Pd. $45.00* Rudolph M. Aguilar -586 Holly #3 � St. Paul, MN 55102 03/21/81 / /81 40.00 1.03191 Ret' d . Mail Larry Lee Eishen 6498 Uppet 54th St. N. Oakdale, MN 55109 03/30/81 40.00 103665 Not Ramsey Cc Stephen M. Raduny 220 Grenadier Oakdale, MN 55119 04/04/81 80.00 103886 Not Ramsey Cc Oliver VanAlstine 14420 - 90th St, So. Hastings, MN 55033 FOR: Kevin G. VanAlstine 04/13/81 80.00 101+250 Not Ramsey Cc James G. Holm 345 Univ, - Un. Gospel Miss St. Paul, MN 55101 04/20/81 4 0.00 1045 71 . Ret�d . Mail *On medical assistance cases we can onlycharge g what at MA allows--balance 'has to be written a *On medical assistance cases we can only charge what MA allows --balance has to be written off. Exhibit B Page 2 of 5 NAME & ADDRESS DATE OF RUN AMOUNT CASE NO. EXPLANATION Michael J. Montero ' 68a5 N. 5th Street Oakdale, MN 55109 05/06/81 40.00 105248 Not Ramsey Co. Laurie Lynn N or t h l 530 Florence Mahtomed, MN 55115 05/10/81 40.00 105452 Not Ramsey Co. Harold E . Cha pa loney 345 Univ. - Un. Gospel Miss, St. Paul, MN 55101 05/20/81 40.00 105873 Ret'd Mail Elsie V. Englin $8.0.00 billed 1900 E. Sherr en Medicare/MA Maplewood, MN 55109 05/13/81 35.00 105528 Pd, $45.00* Christine Valturra 17 Grotto St. Paul, MN 55104 06/08/81 80.00 106679 Ret' d . Mail Kevin Scott Walker 450 Nash Road Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54494 06/13/81 40.00 106921 Not Ramsey Co. Mary C. Carlson 3208 Diamond 8 Terrace St. Anthony, MN 55421 06/18/81 80.00 107147. Ret' d . Mail Luana M. MacCar ter 4212 E. Robert E. Lee St. Phoenix, AZ 85032 06/30/81 80.00 107717 Not Ramsey Co. Hazel V. Thro $80.00 billed 2005 Ide #203 Medicare/MA Maplewood, MN 55109 06/04/81 35.00 106486 pd. $45.00* William H. Schmidt 373 Winthrop St. Paul, MN 55119 07/14/81 40.00 108447 Ret' d . Mail Alice Irene Grant Billed $80.00 2413 Dolphin payment rec' d . Maplewood, MN 55119 07/16/81 25.60 108541 over' MA allowable *On medical assistance cases we can only charge what MA allows --balance has to be written off. t, 101 Exhibit B .,.. • r NAME & ADDRESS DA TE OF RUN AMOUNT CASE NO, Page3of5 EXPLANATION Patricia A, Stettner 6173 Carmen Ave. E . Inver Grove Ht s . , MN 55075 0 7 18 81 / / 80, 00 108635 Not Ramsey Co, Walter M. Niederoski 2691 Geranium Billed $80.00 Maplewood, MN 55119 • 07/29/81 12.00 109166 Medicare allow only 68.00.* Janet Kay Flynn 426 Marshall St, Paul, MN 55102 08/01/81 40,00 109318 Ret d. Mail Kathleen M, Peterson 1512 E. Co. Rd. B #210 Bi lled. $80.00 Maplewood, MN 55109 08/04/81 35.00• 109457 M/A allowed an paid $45.00* Sheldon H. Anderson 1361 E. Belmont Previous bills Maplewood, MN 55109 08/16/81 80.00 110052 filed in court never paid, Charles W. Haines 410-B So. McKnight #15A Maplewood, MN 55119 08/19/81 40.00 110214 Bankruptcy, Sheldon H. Anderson 1361 E. Belmont , Previous bells Maplewood, MN 55109 08/21/81 80.00 1,10268 filed n court i never paid Nan Louise Root 1881 Furness #111 Maplewood, MN 5.5109 08/28/81 80,00' 110608 • Ret d , Mail Candy J. Thomas 1854 Beebe Rd., #131 Billed $80 M/A Maplewood, MN 55109 06/10/81 40.00 106 2 77 allowed and pa. -� $45 + court fi Tir zah Koenke 1900 E. Sherren Billed $80 M/A Maplewood, MN 5510908/25/81 35.0011045 9 a l lowed and pa $45.00 Nadia Bradbury 896. E. 6th Street CAMC case - . St. Paul, MN 55106 09/01/81 5.00 110759 Billed $40 M/A paid $35.00 David Leroy McKay 2001 Clark Maplewood , MN 55117 09 / 08 / 81• 40.00 111032 MIA refected Stephen R. Ander t 2113 McMe nervy CAMC case - Maplewood, MN 55117Billed 09/09/81 5.00 111082 $40 M/A paid $35.00 Carol Jean Laducer 143 Eo Arch, Apt. A St. Paul, MN 55101 09/21/81 40.00 111601 Ret' d , Mail Lillian F. Dehaven CAMC case - 2593 Mayer Lane Maplewood, MN 55119 09/28/81 5.00 111852 Billed 4 $ 0 M/A Paid $35,00 *On medical assistance/medicare cases balance has to be we can one charge what y g MA r • o medicare allows-- written off, NAME &. ADDRE S S Mary Jane Welch 4701 - 81st Ave N Byn rookl Park, MN 55443 Wallace Vanderhewe 1 1900 Sherr en Maplewood, MN 55109 Marcus Monn 2000 White Bear Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 Gladys Bilderbach 1841 Myr t 1 e Maplewood, MN 55109 Herschel To Bauer 215 So. Crestview Maplewood, MN 55119 Deborah Jo Valentine 2349 - 12th Ave* No No. St . Paul, MN 55109 Roy Mullen Pine Villa Apt. 115 Menahga, MN 56464 Kerry G. Conrad 6.89 Cimarron Lake Elmo, MN 55042 George Eiley Clark 6819 - 11th St. N. Oakdale, MN 55119 Gary John Pribnow 14166 Goodview Avenue No Hugo, MN 55038 Paul K. Hendrickson Route 1 Downing, WI 54734 Charles W. Haines 410 So. McKnight -B#15 Maplewood, MN 55119 Anita L. Belland 1923 E. County Rd, B Maplewood, MN 55109 Exhibit B Page 4 of 5 DATE OF RUN AmIOuN T CASE NO. EXPLANATION 10/23/81 40'600 1128.48 Not Ramsey Co. $$0.00 billed 11/29/81 20.00 114381A Not Ramsey $80.00 bil MA paid $4'. 12/5/81 35.00 114592 12/20/81 40.00 115200 Ret' d . Mai charge what MA or medicare allows-- 'stance/medicare cases we can only g *On medical asst, �_ �}A� ^ f f Medicare/MA 10/24/81 12.00 112874 Pd. $68.00* $80.00 billed Medicare/MA 09/21/81 12..00 111594 Pd. $68.00* $120.00 bills Medicare pais 10/17/81 75.00 112610 $45.00* $80.00 biller Medicare/MA 10/20/81 12.00 112732 Pd. $68.00* $$0.00 bills MA paid $45. .11/19/81 35.00 113987 11/23/81 40.00 114128 Not Ramsey C 11/24/81 20.00 114166 Not Ramsey t 11/28/81 40.00 114342 Not Ramsey 11/29/81 10.00 114350 Not Ramsey 11/29/81 20.00 114381A Not Ramsey $80.00 bil MA paid $4'. 12/5/81 35.00 114592 12/20/81 40.00 115200 Ret' d . Mai charge what MA or medicare allows-- 'stance/medicare cases we can only g *On medical asst, �_ �}A� ^ f f DATE OF RUN AMOUNT NAME & ADDRE S S FLORENCE LEVERTY 1900 E Sherren Avenue21 81 12.00 Maplewood, MN 55109 12 / / Exhibit B Page 5 of 5 CASE NO* EXPLANATION $80.00 billed Medicare/MA 115220 Pa $68.00* Daniel A. Terry 6462 -40th Street N . 12/27/81 40.0 0 115437 Not Ramsey Co . Oakdale , MN 55119 Lawrence.A. Davidson Beech Street 9b3 B � 12/2.9/gl .80.0 0 115510 Ret' d . Mail S t . Paul , MN 55106 Edward G. Saum Case 2318 C 07/19/81 . 5.00 108688 Under $10.00 Ma piewood , MN 55119 Sandra Grunz 2414 Castle Avenue MN 55109 40 110843 Pending MA pay-Maplewood, FOR : Jonathan Mo Grunz p9/03/81 .00 ment $ 2,335.60 June 2, 1982 MEMORANDUM To: City Manager Barry Evans7z 440'9 From: Deputy Chief Thomas Hagen Subject: Special Request - David P. Bauer - 1610 Sterling Police calls to the neighborhood since December 31, 1979: Rodney Peterson - 1580 Sterling August 15, 1980 - Burglary, nighttime, owners on vacation, no suspects. February 13, 1981 - Burglary, daytime, two adults arrested and charged. December 8, 1981 - Burglary, daytime, one adult charged. ,Cyril McFadden - 1590 Sterling March 8, 1980 - Damage to tree. David Bauer - 1610 Sterling November 28, 1981 - Reported 10 drunks in yard at midnight, gone on police arrival. December 28, 1981 - Suspicious vehicle, owner asked to move. May 9, 1982 - Juveniles with alcohol, trespassing, fire- crackers, ire - crackers, 10:05 p.m., one adult cited, two juveniles handled through Juvenile Division, one adult warned. Sharon Behr - 1630 Sterling III No record of calls to police. Charlotte Gauthier - 1659 Sterling No calls since December 31, 1979. George Fosburgh — 2516 E. Idaho No reports. This neighborhood is in close proximity to Hill Murray High School, which has approximately 1,400 students attending. It also is adjacent to several hundred acres of undeveloped property owned by Hillcrest Development Company. Access to that property from McKnight Road has been successfully curtailed b barricading n the entrance and digging n of ditches. Alternate entrances_ will y 9 99 9 be sought by those who enjoy nature and others who want to take advantage of • the area for activities other than the enjoyment of nature. There is no access to this property for police vehicles, thus curbing police abilities to enforce no trespassing violations and others. • met with Mr. Bauer and has ice De The Pot P artment Crime Prevention unit has nand awareness program to the community. offered to present a crime preventio can be Thi's offer has been accepted and will take place as soon as it organized* • more demands on.police time to The placing n of No Parking signs leads . to - b P g observe violations but would be called y enforce. We would not only o, Arkin has not • respond to violations noted by them. Further, ,p g citizens to respo would not curb entering the area by been a problem on Sterling Street and motorcycles and all-terrain vehicles* good lighting Ming i s a deterrent_ to *me, Though law enforcement sincerely_ believes g 9 ve an cr • g believe.an added street light here would ha , t s difficult to bel • now existing seem adequate. We would strongly effect since two lights g. secure their own individuals vi duals who desire additional illumination recommend nd erect them on their property. security Ti ghti ng from the power company a TLH : j s SPECIAL REQUEST MEMORANDUM Date: 19 May, 1982 To: Members of the e Cit Council, City of Maplewood • Sterling St. N., 1500 and 1600 Blocks From: t;itizens of S Subject: Safety and Security Requirements Requests: • ne s both sides of street , or. Sterling, from the i. Creation of N o Parking zo ' d a roximately one block* intersection of Idaho south to the dead en , PP existing ower pole between the currently ex g 2.. Installation of lighting g on p of 1590 Sterling (approx. half S li hts at Sterling and Idaho, and in front way, or 160 ft. from either light)* Description of Hazardous Condition: Sterling St. has three residences, spaced far apart, The referenced block of g The West side, approximately on the -East side, and open woodland on the West. of. acres of unimproved at the , wooded property which half way point on the block, is an entry point to hundreds is privately owned. The entry is frequently used -by motorcyclists, 4 wheel drive vehicles, and persons engaging in • d and illegal activities. Although the area is miscellaneous noisy, rowdy, �� si ns the illegal entries go unabatede clearly posted with "No Trespassing g ' nfronted with h disru tion of the The citizens of the area are frequently co.t P peace and quiet Cat all l hours of the day) , and at times, with threats to . • lis to the safety and security. Numerous ca Police Department during the past o f the roblern. few years clearly attest to the seriousness P Rationale:- • led with Lighting of the entry point to the Posting of NoParking signs, coupled from unauthorized and illegal wooded area, would significantly deter people use of the areas they curt thereby removing a serious threat to the peace an security of local residents* Summary: We, the undersigned residents of the City of Maplewood, request that these actions be taken at the earliest opportunity. We appreciate your consideration and cooperation; Im. Z_Vu. 13(luitj ioo Uyzlvs St, �}yeur s�erer� M�? R64DuE1/ P saAJ � 5 8o s�euN� i M!� �l�?2 5 L' �lQ IC /tle FhDA�JV j r590 sr�rw�r� X i X: y. pP_DpOSE(J 41G1{7INMW4T/0/J / ctpprox I6o ft. to er�frer \ � curraffy extsf+n1 us4 t J Mk8.Me5 UVID BAUlt ib�o sr�nvuG Mk MRS. G601? G C POS 8u 26 a St � E. TOAHo s E. IDAMo sT Ni2S. slfA2cn! PvEHR 1 E 3 o sr�u�rG => vi 4A,CPVVMUR AVE DEAD-vib o� 57M/NG ST ZONE �14� 4wmy TQ+41L TD WOODED Af2tA M2S. crt�o 1659 5 t8 8 I�lO�rlEtc Z 770-9'114 4, j If" rt' VOK& s ogo_.AMt I X _. 4ri W6M- 1 0. A -6 im-F WA M. Fffm6.m ,f /k, A 0 r 'OR N M W. MIMI WR / r EWA ♦ _'TMO. �•� iii � �•%---�-= -_'I f'' ' • _ s i' MIMI IRA 07. . "�m AM WAA AM "-m MMI 10 1 .w �•/i1 0 MEMORANDUM TO. Mayor and City Council FROM: Barry R. Evans, City Manager. DATE: June 8, -1982 SUBJECT : Police Chief Selection V/ d i / As you are aware, i n order for the vacancy in the Police Chief position to be fi 1 l ed, it is necessary for the Civil Service Commission to supply me with names of three individuals qualified to hold the position. As a result of my request for such names, they have taken certain actions: 1. They have determined to limit applications to those presently members of the Maplewood Police Department with a minimum of ten (_10) years experience as a Sergeant or above. 2. They wish to give an Assessment Center type of examination to those who do apply. The Assessment Center process would consist of a written examination, plus an oral process involving several different types of exercises, including simulation and role playing, The oral portion would be given by a pri nci pal . from the consulting firm and two police chiefs from out of the metro area. The. Civil Service Commission would like to hire Forbes McCann Associates of Huntington Valley, PA for this process. McCann has been used by them for ,other written exams in the past. The cost of the process would range from $2,975 to $4,475, depending on the number of days involved, and where the police chiefs used come from and the travel expenses involved. They anticipate being able to complete the testing in two days, which means the final cost will probably be between $3,600 - $4,000. I checked with one firm i n the Metro Area and their cost for a similar y '•process is $4,000. In any case, the Civil Service Commission is requesting that Council authorize the transfer of $4,000 from the contingency fund to cover the cost of the exam- ination process. BRE: 1 nb �- RAMSEY COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT WA W 0 F� 1850 White Bear Avenue Telephone (612) 777-1361 St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 Anthony J. Crea, Director Bernard L. Edmonds, Asst. Director June 3, 1982 Mr, Robert D. Odegard Director of Community Services City of Maplewood 1380 frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Odega rd : On May 21, I notified you that the County has paid assessments for property in Battle Creek Park which is being used by the City of Maplewood as Afton Heights Park. A cursory review of the aerial photographs would indicate that an area of not less than 12.4 acres is being used for park purposes by the City of Maplewood I am herewith submitting an invoice for $4,,523 as the Maplewood share of the assessments based on $364,.77/acre for 12.4 acres as agreed to .under Paragraph #8 of the Permit for Use. If a revised master plan indicates an area different than 12.4 acres an adjustment will be made in the charge. Please feel free to call if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, A thony J. Crea Director AJC: j jh Enclosure cow® WHITE -CUSTOMER COPY COUNTY OF RAMSEY PINK -COUNTY ACCOUNTING BLUE -COUNTY TREASURER GREEN - RETAINED coPv DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION N C E �y NAME. --CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 32-75 (Last) (First) ADDRESS 1380 FROST AVENUE FOR ACCOUNTING USE ONL Y DEPT. 4$ � INVOICE 9-13 1l 1,145 REGISTERED DATE ,�.z, 2111 MAPLEWOOD MN 55109 10. AMOUNT 122-31 DATE � QUANTITY DESCRIPTION -r�-------- UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Maplewood's share of assessments, based on $364.77/acre for 12.4 acres as agreed to under Paragraph #8 of the Permit for Use. $4,523. 0 MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO NOTICE RAMSEY COUNTY AND FORWARD TO 138 COURT HOUSE 565 56503 370104 ST. PAUL, MINN. 55102 REGISTERED: BUDGETING AND ACCOUNTING Form ADM-BA-30OR CERTIFIED CORRECT JUNE 39 1982 DATE N CRE ----- BY • RAMSEY COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT �eeYoo�rtY 1850 White Bear Avenue Telephone (612) 777-1361 St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 May 21, 1982 Anthony J. Crea, Director Bernard L. Edmonds, Asst. Director Mr. Robert D. Odegard Director of Community Services City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Odegard : The Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department has aid improvements p , p its assessments for to be made by the Ramsey -Washington Metro Watershed District the Battle Creek Project #1. ct in � In reviewing the records, I find that the payment incl p y included an asssessment of $179319..57 for the parcel coded in the De artment • p of Property Taxation as 57-00100-130-27 containing 47.48 acres, This assessment calculates out to $364.77 per acres, and includes Afton Heights Park, . The 25 year permit between the city of Maplewood ewood and Ramsey area described � 1 p y County � ' s for an ed as being 400 x 1050or approximately 9.64 acres. A review e of the aerial photograph of the site and an on-site inspection i actual area P • indicates that the e used by the City of Maplewood as Afton Heights Park is substantially larger than i s authorized g ally o i zed by the permit, Due to the discrepancy, I recommend the fol lowi n9 action. 1. Submit a revised master plan to the Count Executive Director . Y o for approval as provided for under p paragraph #5 of the permit, p 2. Prepare a new description identifying the exact area desired Maplewood b y under the use permit and submit it to the Executive Director along with the master plan. After the Executive Director has taken action on the mas ter1 a p n , the matter should be presented to the City Council and Count Board for n Y concurrence. The City of Maplewood will be invoiced for assessments on the area authorize under the revised permit on the basis of $364.77 per acre as agreed to under paragraph #8. Your assistance in this matter wi l l be appreciated. Sincerely, An hong J. Crea Director AJC:jjh _ a f %pasYt1C. �6 .t..iJ 1 • : _:-moi'. - .. .....,i •T -.t Alv VILLI:G Or I' c pL�►;:OOD Da 64 1971. 1 • DLSCrIPTIOIN OF F.?LZ•.YSES Ramsey County thy: county) grants to the VillaSe of M :Plewood municipal � a. pa 1 c or poration of the Stata of 1-Unnesota (the village the t � exc 1tiS1 �e right to use, en4oy and control the following described rr�Y--• �..�seZ • The ea,starly 400 feet of the sotitherly 10 0 feet o� the southeazA quarter of the northwest quarter, stiction 1, tot*ns=tip 28, ran -e 22, rkar=Oy Count;;, State of I-1:nneset4 for : zcreation and for co^.^.ifi��nity use by all of the oeoole o2' Ra:asey Count 2. TEM--. This pe -2 --mit is for a term of 25 Years begir_nine- on iia.,► 1, 1971, and end' ng m Lpril 0, ? co -, 3.T� u.�z:�.�rz ole .The � countw' - taakes no char,,.—: f cir perras. t, but the village s ha.l l engage in n subs tan-isI ij..pro ��:r.1..._ _ enL ., program of the premises Within five years from the da: to hcrC o=' if tee Vill a Je fa.:.ls to so per fo:7M, to county may cance v S l t perriit by. ZJLving •-,xitten notice of cancellat4. � Lon to the vii lam.. 4. ASSIG:;ABILITY. The village shall not ass. -.Tr, n t?z- s permit, 59 PLANNING ALM COINSTRUCTIONe The villarge shall subral t a master plan of the premises, includina Complete layout t., f or use of areas; possible play equipment, anticipatad utilities -�sadin and id zntification of plantings to the Ramsey nCoun�,/ � a'm_n_strC.toi for approval. ' hiw approval shall not be unreasonablyi tir_tnh�b. The Ramsey County adm-inistTl for must a;�p:.zo•Je all divia tion: fro: the original plan. - r r ., ., As pari o� tli:. appy oved plan. may, attach fi::tures or si=ns and a;�,-at fi:CtLxes or structUZ, n or upon the promises, 411 WE which shall be ti:er t L p oper ,,,� ., f she county, m •.........._ a rl:, ...,: ., ,° .. .. ;� ,. .. .. . . 'r _ re pa �.�� Ly L ',� ., -- �.a Li V'vPc:.n l.G....� �. �.' 0:��.. v.i..7.' �Z.'r —n' '� • of Ecco- G:- .. _ L#�i good Par;: I.: „awn t`nP,ncc D �^ t.? County shall2_ i'OVG ).1 CO:: .:Jn •' 1� accept�u enviror,:nental a.ntx'us_ons• The village shall see to ittllali a V .� utilit' es and viire al, placed undar round • 7e USE BY /OTHERS. Each agreement between t � •. �1 V villa�e and a rd part; * f or the us e, occi-ipancy o:, en I o-:-;;:ent of ti:e preM_Ses is su'o� ect to tae a: pra �-a1 of ti�a c?irec for of t?1� Ramse�T CountV Parks and Recree tion .Depart:.2-mt - j.uucq Sj.zt�_no u. +r_e vlll- a 51" 11 PV all levied e-t2inst the prellises 99 L_ '":IF IG.ATIC.' The v+11G�;c sp.n. 1 +7der.n- - �r the Minty and sa: it rarmle.�a Lrcm any and all cl�.ir^.s ca:-ia M� -t� ��. Z: t.=Ci'1 t :� COLI: tom' r�4�� L' i 3C_l? l'�GZ 4 1 f or n t�- :v vi• G... .,., caused tk1'Oug11 the nay1i-,enCE3 Of tZ:m V.'..11ac O?' any -Of j,. tL,ar,"en V erplo;;TAes b tuc of "s ^+Hera tion and control of ' i71•,,t�t Ci OU'7. Y BOA 1D Ci' Cc.,. ..ISS T 0! ,--,S Arproved 4s to 1 or:: and C V i e.. V.1 - s a ,. :., C oun t;;- t L 0 - r a �j/ VILLAGE Or I•iA a:.�T,; •'OC'� i Apnroedasas` o o d e:;ecu •r�Ti,�a Y - cr , By Attest: L,corz '�{� e r � C7 V A l� of IA"aple::cod i�U.1.I2n Cl i' QZ\X1,TI% Q1' NIINN } �0TA Tt-io,,o, s � .,,_.o. Cc.�'� CHARLES P. NICCARTY ARTN,IJR T. Gini orfs CHAIRMAN GEoRc;L A. Hl.f:r ENe RGH .JOHN E. DAUDNEY � E 132 C -- �...� r f3oY P. 1. �. , tvA�....0 MRs. DONALD M. DE COURCY ED SALVERDA I�i� July- 20, 1:70 refor to C.B. i`i ? e 1706 • ' .... •.• tay :z �T%,• i...t�?-%..11 s Cr•�n..r; " Z,ttC>:.•r..- Attt}: Daar Sir: i1tG Lour c ...,., .. F..:,+..,c--� ... CC1�.:t.} _ Co. --►.i. s i ts::_ . s j.n �. • T 2, � �: S : t►n o,, „ �, �.�; �, 1 C• .. , v �� C• ,•�p. 1. i' •ry•��•.� 1.• 1 r L- •. i. l �•• �-1 • C. .. .'. �. a i .� �.•.r��•^r. 4. • t. �� •..:. i• �1.�� �� 11'♦. � v t V A• t t . •. i �. 'v /�i 1�r�1 ♦•:.�.♦�.• �•1.•M0 V ... • .• • �♦ ♦ f �� . \.� l . i. / .. l= •moi •�. 'v .. �.. t ���Il�, C�:_ t*::i.. GL: •t?2`.* ��.. C' . .�. r; CtL L ..['�'),.�. C— Z. c;,..:..,,..C;.C•.. .> >.... 1% .�i �.... �1i1.�.-:oV:1 :: � &a1: 1c'� � c CL'j';;:.:r in t C��l V.:a i:oC N,t O� tG:: s Thi lerv3l C3� CI"1t:�2_G�l 1S 4:' fC�11C�r: ..:... �: .. ....�all,..ilt.., t..� c:....,..,�;. � � • ., ..�_.. C. L:..:. ti l . •. ! 10 042 w `! ♦ .. C . I i. i. i i. a L • .. l G.:.? �. , ' • J • \ • L w `+ . 1 • 22 IC . x • � i r c) �) `. • s. 1. .. •.. �r ..• :1 b . it '.1 4.1Ci. V� J. L.+ • ` • :.. t. - 'v A. .r . • L. • • � r0'_':'::i . .':: �:'' c �n CCS: Cr'lnt L►..�.. L C): f • � pro- .:r ty Ly the� � 1 i 4-L— e- : �:\, n ... cr I.�.. �: � c:,. �:.. t Will• • n �•.: \ . 1 ♦ I• ♦� • 1 �'� r• ^ •� r •jr /^� � � .1 •� � � f 1• � 1"+ •, .• � T ... • •. ^ . •f �c7'J %3L'�:.%� Ui•�•f.. S•_� �..•'►•1'L.1r 1� •-` L�i•�+ i.�I� It t0 til.,' �•••�►L.Z•a��.vt.::v for execution on of Ramsay Cun y You -..as very truly, fiI113161 �S J. I ':..1��''>', Co inty Aull icor Ey • J. D. S:?3I1, LOC:it1;:e .. ..- Secrct a:y. JDS:rs cc: 11:lt:�ony J . F.� i t cr, �: i #6. t+3nlc::o::r.� Rec�•cL t ion. Dear t:::t::t r� ,. , • .� �1.�a aa, i, (cb • � t • � • i ' � : •.i. t, t� : : •, f •: Vit' (� V► � � t `t [hr .� i. a• .- � :.� � • :i � • •= . '• -, r � lam"- + �� • .,.,.� ` ._ � t . �9,tlpf• 1'�1�'1 E:ix.z t A%UDI" �,• rt t. i I i SAINT PAUL 2 MINNES07A I;ovuab c r 9) 1064 .- I 1 F - 1 �� �� t ..� •t. t �• 1 a 'y V. wA Cent1.c:-.n: T o E 0 nx3 a (� w - ;, 1• c-�-- - f • rr^' L � . {(; r 4 r n c., '"Old tVj L �L ►• to �• .�A a.. • �L V E'd ? • `�J. •.� .. �•L L• O �.l .. t �I. . w • `r :• ��.�1. 1 C i C�. r` V �- Y• r • � J. l+ �i !" n � .f. 1 • 1 . .1 � I). 1 A •• �. .;' • r J •.a � - .•� r t ^ • a ; ', ' ` t ♦.., •. � � r ..1 • 1r .. • • : �v�I nt' �• o v aj s V `• `` • �/ •�. C M C• 4 l • • � Iii • •�/ r/ w. c V .i. tea. 4 `� j . �!• r f.. V L dr V V �: ♦ ..i� l �� I - r . � •.. •,' • Std".) _i acct to ron ., r•..�•:. C��C., nt� tree C.': e w .)D of.«otL%r:.:r:Ly '.aD cf �,�.;; cj. �:�' �= ofp E c. 1 1• .28 .01 R 22 4 r •tt{tp 7l Il JA- b I. `�� t •`i• r 1 �1/� ��, { I�.1 f1 � ♦t7 �:�•••�','r � �{M•.J �.. t`i •�.- atii..L �4••.` M• V • a.'. `t l� . : j./ t `J �I �.'. `• i1t .•. �•.♦ V o w - . •� . •: �,.1 . i • t `.. • a. • : i a .t . • 21 aw. M `J:. • ..` or Ib « .• . 1 �. �• �• C� �% •. ` �• C V �/ Vis r r/ tI \ .r•� `'r �i .•r • V v j • • V • .! •.r �.• �• V • A. •i �• • • • • %WOPI• R to .: to .1.,r ..t _d vi!e-n th.. Lc. ..fir ._._3 cr t,.• o: • yyou1 f.• 1 s �+ r « � fit• � ti • .. • 4 • � �+ s � .�• I- ^ S� a l '1 � • � • � � : �••� ou }• l iiv ► e cc &o,Ihirt � . � :11"Rv :, `•V... 1.i � V�Ir� ••..2' �•.L � L C V �r c �'ii�. . •�.�.E.1. \• `J�r. � •� � 1 �. i�.�• �:� • 04 t4... vmY v ,Zr... :.z� ./1 ♦ � I. � r• • � � • •A 1. � �.. • •1 •� ♦. .♦ • tyt � i h • t • •�► � 1 � .. t _. a� • 1 .. n. c O� c.�.1 cc:�.;. .c�t..Cei•10 ca.-oi%I` ��:: �I.i?r�'...sr �_�tii ��C�i �....�; ..C1.:...1vti `.J..:..: ice.•. E 0=1 l�. I:C'#Zs" Ccvaitvw2Li or B JD3 i� / J. D* un, D:ccutive Secret :WY � v= •nDirector. s / cc . pm arcs S. Ji .,m, 1.1 lc-uood 1:""crcatio'n L.Npt. 1'.nyor R% ron :Uri villuze of t•:aplcxoc.,i T0: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: ARPLICANT/OWNER: DATE Reuquet MEMORANDUM City Manager Associate Planner --Randall Johnson Special Exception --Home Occupation 2239 Hazelwood Avenue Charles and Betty Smith May 10, 1982 SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL Approval of a special exception permit to continue to operate a commercial cleaning business from the applicant's home. The business has been in existence for the past five years at this location. Proposal 1. Refer to the applicant's letter of justification. 2. The business office consists of a partitioned 10 x 12 foot area or about six percent of the dwel 1 i ng s floor area. a 3. No advertisement is proposed on the premises, other than the initials "CBS" located on the street sides of the garage. 4. Cleaning and paper supplies are delivered to the premises once a week by a step van -type vehicle, similar to that used by UPS. The products are stored in a walk-in closet during the winter months and in the company truck during the summer months. 5. The company truck is a pick-up truck with a topper. Advertising is written on the topper. CONCLUSION Anal ys i s The proposal is consistent with the Planning Commission's guidelines for home occupations. 'The public would not visit the premises. The office space is maintained strictly for record keeping and tax purposes. Until this application was made, apparently few, if any, of the neighbors realized a -business was operated from this dwelling. During the course of a public hearing regarding the property to the east, the applicant informed the City of the existence of this business. No complaints had been received. Recommendation Approval of a special exception permit to operate a commercial cleaning business as a home occupation at 2239 Hazelwood Avenue, subject to: 1. Compliance with the criteria outlined in the Planning Commis i on Subcommittee Report. - 2!: Approval is granted for three years, after which time the applicant may apply for a renewal if the business has been compatible with the neighborhood and all conditions are being met. 3. No outdoor storage of business-related equipment shall be permitted,and no vehicle with a load capacity greater than one ton. 4. There shall be a wall -mounted ten pound ABC fire extinguisher located in the garage, easily accessible from the dwelling, when commercial products are stored in the walk-in foyer closet. 2 BACKGROUND Site Description 1. Lot Size: A 10,792 square foot corner lot 2. Existing Land Uses: A single dwelling with an attached9 aia e. The driveway can accommodate four cars. � 9 .. _,Surrounding Land Uses North: Lark Street. Across Lark Street, single dwellings East: Hazelwood Avenue. Across Hazelwood Avenue, a single dwelling 9 South: Single dwellings West: A single dwelling Past Actions Council has approved similar service businesses as home occupations in theP ast . Two recent approvals were for an asphalt driveway business at 1758 Clarence on August 6, 1981 and for a window -washing business at Kohl man Avenue and Elm Street on November 20, 1980. DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS Planning 1. Land Use Plan Designation: RL, Residential Lower Density 2. Zoning: R1, Residence District (Single Dwelling) 3. Section 905.010(1) of the Zoning Code .permits the offices of professional persons within a single dwelling, but only when authorized by the City Council, Public Safety 1. A ten -pound ABC fire extinguisher should be mounted on the wall in theara e 9 9 when cleaning products are stored in the foyer closet. 2. Provide two smoke detectors --one on each level. jW 77 Enclosures: } 1. Planning Commission Home Occupation Guidelines 2. Location Map 3. Property Line Map 4. Applicant's Letter of Justification 5. Featurette--tela 1 ewood Review 3 PLANNING COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT r. The Planning Commission concurs with the need for an appropriate definition of a home occupation. It is also felt that while certain occupations require the issuance of a s eci--al permit, other activities such as those that do not have any of the following P use P should be allowed without a permit: 1 Employment of any person not residing in the dwelling unit 2. Customers visiting the premises 3. Manufacture of products on the premises. The remises. The Planning Commission proposes the following guidelines for a Home Occupation: Home Occupation requiring a permit is defined as that occupation conducted in a dwelling unit involving the manufacture and/or sale of a product or service, subject to the following limitations: 1. Is conducted on a continuing basis,, that i s , for more than 30 days out of the year. a 2. Not more than one person other than members of the family residing on the premises shall be allowed to engage in such occupation. 3. The use of the premises for the home occupation shall be clearly incidental and subordinate to its use for residential purposes by i_ts occupants, and no more than an area equivalent to 20% of the dwelling unit floor area shall be used in the conduct of the home occupation. 4. There shall be no change in the outside appearance of the building or premises, or other visible evidence of the conduct of such home occupation other than one sign, not exceeding two square feet in area, non -illuminated, and mounted flat against the wall of the principal building. 5. There shall be no retail sales of products produced off site in connection with such home occupation. 6. No traffic shall be generated by such home occupation in greater volumes than would normally be expected in a residential neighborhood, and the need for off- street parking shall not exceed more than three off-street parking spaces for the home occupation at any given time in addition to the parking spaces required by the resident occupants; in no event shall such number of off-street parking spaces exceed a total of five such spaces for the premises and shall be off of the street other than in a required front yard. 7. No equipment or process shall be used in such home occupation which creates .noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odors, or electrical interference detectable to the normal senses off the lot, if the occupation is conducted in a single family residence,,:. -or outside -the dwelling unit --if conducted in other than a single family resi dence.r- -In the case of electrical interference, :no equi p- _ ment or process shall be used which creates visual or audible interference i n any radio or television receivers off the premises, or causes fluctuations in 1 i ne voltage off the premises. Z 8. No fire, safety, or health hazard shall exist for the residents -of the. dwel 1 i ng unit, customers, or employee. ' �. RADAT 'LJjAVE I Koh/q)on / � Q � o . L o k e a m ..•............../% K H AN A j J ~ Y KOHLMAN AVE 0 L M V E "� �r ,,, z 23 COUNTY ROAD �' „o„ 1 ll, J �N W ! 1 MJ N F- , cr W cr W1 311 E ocEHILL RD. uj U _ r Q i V a � c Z -� _ I DEMONT U. AVE.W) W L 1r I O f W - ,` ROOK AVE 21 JE Q� aicr BROOKS :I t AVE - L 61co t Q SEXT NT AV +� GERVAIS AV E. !? GERVAIS L AVE. �A G �ANDVIEWIFA V E. �- �. 36 j VIKING =DR. /, �SHERREN A F \\'' DOPE VEleir LARK AVE J LAR AVE. e ��,, O U T Y o �- L____� R i L A U E R D. z 1- �_Z oQ o a - op �FLELAND '�cs l+'�1:.25 AN MURST 2 61 JUNCTION AVE W Q P BU RKE AVE } m o �� NT � ELDRIDG E AVE o Av r 0� W SELMON T L AVE W AV Q N 64 , VE v SKILL MA N m AVE _ HAR RIS ! J SN It AVE � Q� m Q�" ROSE, !WOOD AVE RYAS a �� COPE AVE. LARK Fl:, AVE � � � LAURIE a Rp. � � I z� {AVE W. � B U K E W a R 28 FROST T N 27 � � a cr 62 W W FE NTON AVE J J Z N WCC Q W 11 GOR3 = cr FRISSIE AVE IL VF Ri� AVE Q Lo a Op SO PH IA ST. u _ Pho/en a a J 62 D 'J` W o a L A RP E NTEu 30 1 Rv E QQ. PJ IPJ AVE 28 Z SU MM ER AV V a5 Q .J CD a i ZLu_ Y a W Woke ti a /d ui � o '� a a m Lok e _ c _ SOP HIA S T. d U3 2 Z 3 PRI GE AVE GJ AVE F] F7 1-1 F1 I (64,)'T %(r--�--�,-----, ST. PA U L LOCATION MAP { e % $40 ui P cn . Q Y 150 12 0' � �► �� !P Y AV � IK I N G -ST N � �Qv �1 Ave. - I I [ J 'P7 1 ;affYj J� 1� IT 4� I- r i + ; � I C i.l l 1. � 1. i I � �.I•,�-•_ oilf r • 1 I �1 Ave. - I I [ J 'P7 1 ;affYj J� 1� IT 4� I- r i + ; � I C { � l ,r F � t � 1 _ 1 t %' r • I •_ C •-rte r1 r ; —'� . — — PROPERTY LINE MAP i.l l 1. � 1. i I � �.I•,�-•_ %' r • I •_ C •-rte r1 r ; —'� . — — PROPERTY LINE MAP L-eWu • +_27�gz 6 Burg ��" r I Chuck and Betty Smith, owners of oMAINTENANCE o husband/wife team, They P8de personal ser- vice and top quality cleaning of affordable prices. Operating out of their home, keep your costs down. In business r 5 and Chuck con are anxious to serve- you. Coll CBS Maintenance they your spring cleaning. Their ad o for - Your ecleoning" in the Who ppeors weekly under Does /t Section. A. Special Exception: 2239 Hazelwood (Smith) _ Secretary Olson said. the applicant is requesting approval of a special exception permit :to continue to operate a commercial cleaning business from his home. The business has been in existence for th4 past five years at this location. Staff is recommending approval of the request. T The applicant was present and indicated they had nothingzto add to the staff report. It was well covered in the report. Commissioner Ki steel moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of a special exception 'to operate a commercial cleaning business as. a home occupation at 2239 Hazelwood Avenue, subject to: 1 Compliance with the criteria outlined in the Pl anni n9 ComrM ss i on Sub- i committee report. s a 2. Approval is granted for three years, after which time the applicant may apply for a renewal if the business has been compatible with the neigh- borhood ei9h-borhood and all conditions are being met. 3. No outdoor storage of business-related equipment shall be permitted and no vehicle with a load capacity greater than one . ton permitted. 4. There shall be a wall -mounted ten pound ABC fire extinguisher located in the garage, easily accessible from the dwelling, when commercial products are stored in the walk-in foyer closet. Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl , Barrett, El 1 efson, Fischer, He jny, Howard, Ki shel , Pel l i sh, S1 etten, Whitcomb, 5: 11 J -y MEMORANDUM TO: City er FROM: Manager OM: Associ ate Planner --Randall Johnson SUBJECT: Special Exception --Home Occupation LOCATION: 1770 Onacrest .Drive APPLICANT/OWNER: Diane Beran DATE: May 28, 1982 SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST Request A special exception permit to operate a decorative folk art painting business (Diane's Designs) from the applicant's home. Proposal 1. The business area would be located in a 10 x 12• foot room on the main level of a one-story dwelling. 2. No advertisement is proposed for thep remises 3. The applicant teaches folk art painting in conjunction with the school district's adult education program. Theclasses are not taught at the applicant's home. Nearby students occasionally (one or two times per week) purchase painting supplies from the applicant at her home. 4. All sales on the premises are b appointment y PP only, 5. The applicant's husband and son make the wooden• items that are painted by the applicant, 6. The applicant relies upon word-of-mouth advertising for product sales and students. 7. The paints stored on the premises are water -bas ' ed acrylics, which do not constitute a fire hazard. CONCLUSION Analysis The Planning Commission's home Occupation on ui d 1 ' • -the retail saleP guideline � ne number five does not permit of products produced off-site. Council _ has, however, recently ecent lyinstructed the Planning Commission to amend this guideline to permit limited sale of such products. -_ The occasional sale of painting n p g supplies to students, by appointment only, would be consistent with Council's desiredof is . P y The proposal is consistent with the remainder- of the Planning Commission's home occupation guidelines, Recommendation Approval of a special i al exce tion permit t - • _. P p o operate a _folk art pay nt� ng business, as a home occupation, at 1770 Onacrest Drive . _ subject b� ec�t to . �1. Compliance with the criteria outlined in the Planning Commission Sub- committee Report, except guideline number five. 2. Approval is granted for one year, after which tim _ e .the applicant may apply for a renewal if the business has been compatible bl a wi th the he neighborhood and .all conditions ons are being met. 3. A smoke detector shall be located on the- main and basement levels of the dwelling 4. A five -pound ABC fire extinguisher g her shall be wail mounted and readily available to the kitchen area, r K, 1 :* BACKGROUND Site Description 1 Lot Size: A 179500 square foot lot 2. Existing Land Use: A single dwelling with an attacheder aa 9 _ 9 Surroundin Land Uses North Single dwelling East: Adolphus Street. Across Adolphus' Street, apartment buildi ngs. The applicant's rear yard drops off steeply to Adolphus Street. South: Single dwelling West: Onacrest Drive. Across Onacrest Drive single e g dwellings Past Actions 5-20-82: Council approved an electronic retail equipment re air and p all sales business for Todd Peterson at 2169 Arkwri ght Street. Retail sales of the products produced off-site were permitted so long as they remain secondary y to the service portion of the business. Council instructed the Planning Commission to permit limited sales ofroducts produced off-site. p p s te. DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS Planning 1. ;Land Use Plan Designation: RL, Residential Lower Density 2. Zoning: R1, Residence District (Single Dwel 1 i n j 9 3. Section 904.010(5) of the Zoning Code premits an art studio,hoto ra h P 9 P y .studio, or other artistic pursuants conducted in a residence or accessory building when authorized by the City Council. Public Safety 1. A smoke detector should be installed on the basement and main levels of the dwelling, 2. A five -pound ABC fire extinguisher should be wall mounted and readily y accessible to the kitchen area. Jw Enclosures: 1. Planning Commission Home Occupation Guidelines 2. Location Map 3. Property Line Map 3 PLANNING COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE TT E REPORT ' The Planning Commission concurs with the need for an a • at' appropriate definition tion of a home .occupation ion. i s also felt that while e certain occupations require the i ssuance of as special use permits other activities such as those that do no t have a of the r'should be allowed without a permit: ermi : nY following 1. Employment of any person not residing in the dwelling unit 2. Customers visiting the premises 3. Manufacture of products on theremi s = p es . The P1 a_nn ng Commission proposes the fo11owing guidelines for a Home Occupation: Home Occupation ccupation requiring a permit is defined as that occupation conducted i n adwelling unit involving the manufacture and/or / r sale of a product or service, subject to the following limitations: 1. � Is conducted on a continuing basis .that ' > > s, for more than 30 days out of the year. 2. Not more than one person other than member • s'occupation, f the family residing on premises shall be allowed to engage in such occu a ti on . P 3. the The use of the premises for the home occupation shall 11 be clearly incidental ,and subordinate to its use for residential purposes b its P � occupants, and no more than an area equivalent to 20% of the dwelling unit floor area shall be u ' the conduct of the home occupation, used n 4. There shall be no change in .the outside a - - or other v' appearance of the building di ng or premises, visible i bl a eve dence of the conduct of such home occupation one sign, not exceeding two _ pati on other than 9 g o square feet in area, non -illuminated and m flat against the wall of the r' mounted principal bu�ld�ng. 5. There shall be no retail sales of- products produced off site in connection with such home occupation. 6. No traffic shall be generated b such. home y , e occupation � ' n greater volumes than would normally be expected in a residential neighborhood, arks 9 hood, and the need for off- street parking shall not exceed more than three off-street ' the home occupation on a parking spaces for • p t any given time i n addition to the parking s ' by the resident occupants; • i n P 9 paces required P no event shall such number of off-street parking spaces exceed a total of five such spaces P g of the P for the premises and shall be off street other than in a required frontY ard, 7. No •equipment or pro -cess shall be used in such home occupation which creates not se, vibration, glares fumes, odors, or electrical ' to the norma] s � cal interference detectable senses -off- the 1 ot, i f the occupati on -i s conduct ' family residence or outsideed �n a single the dwel l.i ng unit -if i f conducted _i n other th r than a�ing1�e family residence.. In the case of electrical interference no a ui __ment or process shall be used which creates visual or aud�bl�am- - interference i in radio or television receivers off the premises, or causes-_ fluctuations inine voltage off the premises. 8. No fire, safety, or health hazard shall exist for the residents of the dwel l i n units customers, or employee. g LITTLE CANADA n INk +� & 58Ilk 36CQ.` LARK i►VE-1, , . , , , ' ' ' VIKIN Y AURIS J c OR t 25 N 4 BURKE V. ELDRIDGE 49 �' ► E AV ,.. BELMONT lA, a EL MONT EKt A n vE 58 w KILLMAN � c Y � 2 W WT: VERNON AVE. t m MT. W W ENO W 60, AVE. W a 26 o LWOOD AVE. W BELL49Y a • POP r AVE In o _ Kf NC AV E. q tCE AVE 4 o � W� 30 : a 51 58 ST. PAUL 10 LOCATION MAP' • '. ^�' � �- �1 -• - �-moi I� � -. � � rr�- _. __ Ct I /00 / i 14 PROPERTY LINE MAP 470 Ak 1 1. 1 PROPERTY LINE MAP TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: 'APPLICANT: OWNER: PRO J ECT: DATE: MEMORANDUM City Manager Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Roof Sign Review VanDyke Street and North St. Paul Road Inter City Oil of America K -Mart, Inc. ICO station Roof Sign s May 26, 1982 SUMMPARY OF THE PROPOSAL Request _ Approval to place a six by five foot roof sign on to of the ICO sta • p _tion. Proposal Refer to the enclosed sketch and maps. CONCLUSION Issues Staff feels that there is some basis for this request. In order to locate a pole sign to meet code, the sign pole would have to be placed ' . P p ced �n the parking lot. This would decrease the visibility of the sign, interfere with traffic and look out of place. Furthermore, a pole sign could not be laced on the grass i n back of the p g • building since i t would interfere with the overhead power lines and also be on public right-of-way. Recommendation Approval of the roof sign for Inter City Oil at 1760 Van Dyke Street, based on the findings that: 1. A, pole sign will not work due to the buildings proximity t to the property P y P P y line ne and interference of overhead power lines, 2. The proposed sign would meet size requirements as outlined in the ordinance and would meet the intent of the ordinance compared with any other permitted method of signing. -1- 4 BACKGROUND Site Description 1. Site Size: The gas station site covers a ro i pp x mately 7,000 square feet of the 14 -acre K -Mart property. Existing Land Use: K -Mart StoreT and gas station Surrounding Land Use Northerly: North St. Paul Ro.ad and A and W R ootbeer Southerly: K -Mart Parking Lot Easterly: K -Mart Store Westerly: VanDyke Street. and First Federal Savings and Loan f1 _ _ 1_ A — a ' — 6-23-81: The Board approval plans for ICO to instal 1. a canopy is subject tothe following conditions: 10 Applicant to obtain all necessary City licenses andp ermits. 2. Lighting from the canopy . shal 1 be directed or screened so not to cause any undue glare onto adjacent properties or roadways. 3. Approval by the Community Desi gn .Review Board does not constitute t tote approval of a building permit. 4. Some plantings to be added along the North St. Paul Road frontage to help decorate the site. P g p Plan to be submitted for review and approval by staff. The canopy has not been installed yet, but all applicable conditions have been met so far. DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Planning 1, Land Use Plan Designation: SC, Service Commercial 2. Zoning: BC, Business Commercial -3. Section9. 818.090 of the Sin Ordinance states the f ' 9 following owe ng regards ng roof signs. - a. Roof signs shall only be permitted, u on review and P approval of a special permit by the City Council. All roof signs in existere at the time of adoption of this ordinance shall be considered as 1 e A T non-conformi n 9 9 signs. - 2 - b. The allowable height of a roof sign shall in no case exceed a height above. the roof equal to the height of the elevation of the building upon which the sign is located. The height above-the roof may be ' equal to the height - from the grade of the access street to the top of a parapet wall or the highest point of the roof. Re'gardl ess of the - height of the building, no roof sign shall exceed-a' height. of 20 feet withoutapproval of a variance as provided for in Section 818.040, Subsection 10. c. All roof signs hereafter erected, placed, altered or moved, shat 1 be reviewed by the Community Design Regi ew . Board prior to consideration by the City Council, In order to recommend to the Council approval of a roof sign request, the Board must find that because of terrain, location and/or configuration of adjacent development -and similar considerations that such a sign best serves the property and public and secures the intent of this ordinance as compared with any other permitted methods of signing, mb Enclosures: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line Map 3. Sign Plan -3- ROAD"c LA E DG EHILL RD. 65 z DEMONT 4 AVE ♦ ROOK AVE.2 :Z) iIF Ir W AVE, lith AVE. SEX INT AM AVE. VA t ADVE, ANDV AV IEW F E. f 3636 V I �Kl N rG AV, AV SH n 15 EN AYE COPE AY�E LARK LA AVE. LAURIE =RD Z et CE RD :] 25 s.A jp] 14 C= ZZ0 R E N E. COPE AVE. :� U) U5 Z -i cr 0 V.1 Z 4 . - i (D5 > Q LAVE '-.�U 0 K E — I 8U KE AYE'__j _j PUBLIC WORKS F % BLDG. SOO 29 V 'Pok I R ELDRIDG AVE. U) MON BELMON, T AVE. > It AIM K11 I ld m A 1-1 C HA pt 13 AVEJ .4 Zi WI -]I Pt Cos WOOD q z 0 1.: WE.. 4 W a "01 su ER ac W Wokefield or a: F5 'c 49 =0 Lok e m Z SOP Of AWE z z PRI AVE. or 10 IL ,. ti 1,6 56 X cr �nnnnnni AVE. � '��' ST, IPLIE Y vr 115149ST-0-N GO AVE Z Fp—RICE XAV El AUL 65 [Inn LOCATION MAP 2640 No 2400 No 2160 N. TANICH CT. RI tPL oc 0 x F T29NRZtW PROPERTY LINE MAP 1 r t•`_ �� `. 1 1 1 PLAZA • SINGLE ,FAM Ll HOMES. i r ! I o i c J - 1 41 „ N TZ 3Pt- U A..' _ , PROPERTY LINE MAP Proposed internally lit roof sign at Inter City Oil Company station p Y at 1760 Van Dyke Street, Maplewood, Minn , at K -Mart Store Sign color will be black and yellow, �o C- 61 a� 4-1 �I o . o, ST. '?A\) L ROAO View looking northeast. Scale approximately 1/4" = 1� v Drawn by Ken Wingard May 24, 1982 ,i b TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development Y SUBJECT: RE Rezoning South of Lower Afton Road .i DATE:. April 9, 1982 Reuest The City Council, on February 4, requested that the Planning Commission a report of the property south of Lower Afton Road that could be prepare • r ort i s to be resented by the considered for RE districts and the report p second meeting in May. Overall -Pu seof the Request To preserve the unique natural features of the area, without increasing the price of lots any more than necessary. Objectives in Order of Importance (page numbers refer to the Plan Update) 1. Ordinances should be as specific and objective as possible (staff proposal). The Cit should continue to use planning principles for housing areas which 2. Y .. encourage c. Preservation of natural and environmental features, such asP onds trees, wetlands, shorel ands , and fl oodpl ai ns (p. 12-8) . 3. Where environmental limitations are present, the City shall encourage low density g housi n or a clustering of different housing types and styles to protect natural features (p. 12-9) . 4. Housing n9 should be kept as affordable as possible for the widest range of people (staff proposal) . 5. The maximum allowed density should not be reduced solely for the purpose of creating g in higher income or exclusive neighborhoods kstaff proposal). 6. Ordinances should be in a form that prospective developers can easily determine g what their rights are before buying the property (staff proposal) . of the City districts should be used to protect areas 7. Environmental overlay that at ma be subject to environmental limitations and have not yet been developed (p. C-23) . 8The Planned Unit Development ment Ordinance should be revised to :enable the .� .diversit City to make better use of this mechanism for promoting hous, Y c� and environmental protection (p. C-23)0 }' i and sitepreparationR (p. 18-5) . 9. Maximize site amenities through minimum grading 10. Ensure efficient utilization and conservation of land on both an individual site as well as a community basis (p. 18-3). .s • planned and designed with shorter street lengths i 11. Residential al areas should be p 9 and with th a minimum of land area devoted to streets (p. l deter�i ni npopulation density 12. The City land use plan should be the guide i n g and distribution, although some flexibility for changing land use patterns and densities should be maintained (p. 18-8) . Decisions Needed in Priority 1� Decide on the area to be studied. 2-. Decide de on the specific natural features to be protected. o 3. Decide haw best t protect these natural features, based on the above objectives. Decision one: Decide on the area to be studied. • stud the area south of Lower Afton Road. Council originally nal iy d� rested staff to y� Council, however, has previously revi ousl discussed larger lots or preserving natural features in other areas of the City, such as: 1, south of Larpenteur and north of the tracks 2. north of Kohl man Lane and Keller Parkway If Council is concerned w0ith th p 9 reservi n natural features in other parts of the area should be expanded to comprise the whole City. City, the study • on specific natural features to be protected. Decision Two. Decide .The following natural features should be considered for protection: 1, wetlands (see enclosed map) 2. slopes es wi th a 12% or greater grade (see enclosed map) 3, woodlands (see enclosed map) 4, sho rel ands and fl oo d'l a -i ns ( see enclosed map) 5 unique habitats WETLANDS The following objectives ' should be used in deciding which wetlands to reserve (in order of importance) : ponding requirements of the ','Maplewood 1. Use existing wetlands to meet the po 9 re q - Drainage Plan water quality of lands and streams by usi_n`g wetlInds to remove 2. Protect the wat q y sediment and nutrients from run-off. Improved water quality.: 2 --increases property values around lakes and streams --improves fish and wildlife habitats --improves recreational opportunities --swimming and fishing P --reduces public costs of storm sewer maintenance and lake renovation projects ands with si abi fiats . 3. Maintain wetl ni fi cant fish and wildlife N 9 'Y A. Allow the development ment of wetlands that serve no significant -public Pur ose. •f• �. Existing wetlands should. be used to meet open space requirements. 6. Preserve wetlands that n aid i groundwater recharge. This could be g important, but significant recharge areas have not been determined at this time. SLOPES WITH A 12% OR GREATER GRADE Twelve percent s i the grade used in our "Critical Area Overlay District Ordinance"* slop es i s to avoid ecological problems caused The purpose for regulating steep- and b siltation and pollution of lakes and streams due to excessive erosion y i n preserving the natural character of steep run-off. There i s also benefit p 9 slopes. WOODLANDS The Metropolitan Council model environmental overlay ordinance uses the following definitions: Woodland --a group of trees at least one-half acre in area and with a crown cover of fifty percent or greater. Tree any woody plant that has at * 1 east one trunk whose diameter four feet above ground is four inches or greater. between the amount of land shaded by the vertical Crown Cover --the ratio s to the total 'ecti on of the branches and fol i age area of standi ng tree prod area of land, usually expressed as a percentage* SHORE LANDS AND FL00 DP LAI NS Shorel ands are defined by the State as: 9 1. 1000 feet from the normal high water mark of a pond, lake or wetland �. 300 feet from a river or stream, or the landward side of a designate floodplain, whichever is greater: i - 3 UNIQUE HABITATS The only unique habitat is a virgin prairie owned by the City, west of Century and south of the tracks, called "Jim's Prairie". Decision Three: Decide how best to protect these natural features, based on the above objectives. .Xxisting City Ordinances - 4-1. In 1979 Y the Cit adopted an environmental overlay district for the area south of Carver Avenue and west of I-494. This ordinance protects steep slopes, wetlands,trees, q P and unique plant and animal species, This ordinance has specific standards that could be applied in the study area., (See enclosed ordinance.) 2. The City's subdivision regulations state that "In the subdividing of any land, due regard shall be shown for all natural features, such as tree 9� rowth water courses, historic spots or similar condi tions, which if _ .preserved will add attractiveness and value to the proposed development. The City Council may require the clustering of lots, such as with a PUD, to preserve natural features" (section 1008-f-8). While this ordinance expresses good intentions, i t is too vague and lacks specific, -objective standards. 3. Staff is working on a shorel and ordinance that must be adopted by September. 4. Section 1008 (e) (2) of the subdivision regulations protects streams and draina9 eways--"Where a subdivision is traversed by a watercourse, drainage- way, rai nage- wa , channel or stream, there shall be provided a storm water easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with the lines of such watercourses, together with such further width or construction, or both, as will be adequate for the stormwater drainage of the area". Section 1006(e)of the subdivision regulations states that "the City Council 6. Se . may require that a reasonable portion of any proposed subdivision be y • q ' n areas or ponds". dedicated to the public as . . . drainage and holding g p The City has required such dedications where ponds are shown on the "Maplewood Drainage Plan". Alternatives ves to Protecting Natural Features (In order of preference ) 1. Environmental Protection Ordinance Advantage: Specific natural features would be protected without raising lot costs by arbitrarily increasing lot areas or reducing density. • specific fi c and objective, this ordinance would Disadvantage. In order to be p more complex ex and technical than the other al ternati ves:_ This s would make be P - the ordinance harder to use. This type of ordinance, how": r. has been n the critical cal area south of Carver Avenue adopted for use � .,�... 4 tr 2. A PUD zone with the maximum allowed density reduced to eight people per net acre. This is the average density that would result if the site was developed with 209000 square foot lots. The PUD zone would allow Council the discretion of determining which areas on the site are to be left undeveloped, Advantages: a. The developer could cluster. homes on part of the site ;and preserve large areas of undeveloped land containing natural features _ b. Clustering units would reduce grading and public improvement costs. Disadvantages a. Since there would be no specific predetermined requirements for which natural features to preserve, Council would have to decide this on a case by case basis. b. Arbitrarily reducing the density may unnecessarily raise lot- costs. 3* RE rezoning Advanta e: This would be the simplest alternative to administer. Disadvantages: a. This would be the least effective alternative for preserving natural features, because of the grading required for street and homesi tes . b. This alternative would raise the cost of lots more than the other alternatives. Comments Alternative one best meets the overall purpose and objectives --it would most effectively preserve natural features, without increasing the price of lots any more than necessary. The enclosed chart and drawings compare the relative costs per lot of dividing a forty acre parcel into 10,000, 20,000, 30,000, and 40,000 square foot lots (alternative 3) The chart also shows the cost of reducing the density, without increasing lot areas (alternative 2) . If Council's main i s preserving significant natural features, without increasing lot costs concern P any more than necessary, than alternative one is best. If, however, Council's main concern is preserving natural features with reduced dens i ty , with less concern for lot costs, then alternative two is best. W -If Council's main concern is large lot neighborhoods, with less concern for natural features and lot costs, then alternative three is best. Staff con- ducted a survey of property owners south of Lower Afton Road with lots of i square feet or more. Three-fourths of them favored an=°RE zone, with -:20,000 q .� al reference for 20,000,30,000, and 40,000 square foot lots* fairly equal p (See enclosed survey.) R Recommendation Direct staff to prepare an environmental protection ordinance that would protect the specific natural features recommended in this report. �c enclosures Study area Wetland map Slope and soil map Tree cover map Floodplain map Critical -Area Overlay District Ordi-nance Chart and site plans of alternatives .Survey NRA minutes i Alt AND "D eEAKWOM Dft. RIDGE I HILL 0 woOD 0 LINWOOD L RD F DAHL cy DA H GT PHYL PHYLt$ cy #41imwo!20 74 E -4w SOUIT14c II.•. -'BOXWOOD AVE. d 68 CARVER 494 14 Z 0 1 t3 1 1 �4 D94 L Tile" it I it v/ l *21W 2130 • RAMSEY :COQ , WASHINGTON 'CO. STUDY AREA REQUESTED BY COUNCIL: 2-4-82 �op���aaQ�J17 . - o1 aI = I 1 •� � j This map is for plamri gO ie. P omy and should not be used where precise • ., �. is required �• 1 . �. ; �,:: ' ::. -•. • .:� m9ciSUr8rT10n ,� ':. � • � :� � . �.,;�.. ia:; •wNl:.hLITTLI CANADA ra_ .;% 7777• ♦j•�; . � •vl .�'. bi ST. PAUL 9nd -s 0e Slight j•�• Moderate t Severe . Ow%fime . rl 6.0"rm .rtl Np11tM tT. PAUL 0 Os i L s i 3M .�.! w"Tt KAN LAKt ,N. famou t^,,A rl rn *n nnt it 114 �� O wpNAIS ►SIGHTS �� - . • rp'`` _ MI O� v O I ^\ fj� u t �0 1 IMN� •- �� " lN� " lost u 01 6.0 g This map purposm � � �� p yyj'wa pfecise measurerTlenj is requited OI LtTTIt C AN AOA tl tree cover Source: Midwest Planning and Research, Inc., 1979 I 'it *,l., *11 • w =i i 3M.....! # 1 � 1 �l IM *JP 'i. •WA3*Ij ON CO. MiWPOMT @ 0 05 (d fflno 1 ' •111 1 1' �'� a � 111 ex !1 11! This rnap is lor plannirV notsesonty and stmidG) be used MWO precise rrteasu"Nwi is required g LITTLE CA14AOA wetlands 0 Wfte "a mm,rw ST. PAM 3m 3M Imam A %Q M @ P0. 0@ 0 flo = 1 � u 1 This map >s k)r plannr9 purposes onhr and should not be used where Precise measurement is required O� LITTU CANADA i u A- S C is 1. .. Mott taw _ w ..,AAAA_ tA%" • .glrwl•. N Z S N°IITH ST. PAUL r S i L Sj '.41!t• 1r/ 3M t • nn 3M • • •t...•.• � CMI off • I [Ll ` 1 5 1 ""T" It PAUL • --� -=--- ��r inn nn nn N its _ ' ��� N _ _ _ _ C, ST. PAUL iS - S1 'AUL s h► «.. to" N ,� hl �N/t1M� M•A fit t!M� tM1 Ih Nba+N 42"t 111 ." a" i�l• 1* tNtl•�t• M�•1 NY • M• twltl R Af floo ain •�� �� Numbers refer to text. �r. �• 1 Flooding prob I e m areas . '�h•" _! 3 � t1 f� • s*1 • s:. •. CA �M tSl ' #f•r•t 1111 jP}I j' 11.1; .N t<j`..�a t_ • 1 , M � corvo cow 4". Flu :� • „ (�+ � t u �� • --fvi • « tlw r� .t1. Midwest _ f .IYrIL.AM....t� _ • ' Planrung� Researchi >al 3M I © 3M w WASHINGTON CO. Department of HUD """° -�-� . -� Source: U.S. p MATCH LOOK jA >' F1 ORDINANCE No., 461 CRITICAL OVERLAY DISTRICT ORDINANCE An Ordinance Promoting the Health, Safety and Welfare e of the Citizens of Maplewood, I►iinnesota, by amending the zoning ordinance, adopting new sections, creating a Critical .. Area overlay District, and creating a Site :x Planning Requirement therein. Section 1. + The Zoning Gode of the city of 11a lewood is amended to add Chapter 918. � GENERAL P ROOT I S I ON S the riississippi River Corridor • din s. The City of liaplewood finds that . 918.'OlQ' Fin the river is a unique and valuable local, within the rietropolitan Area and essential element in state, regional and national resource. The r Iver is an trans ortation, sewer and water, and local regional, state and national p al f unctions. .the , • and serves important biological and ecologic recreational system . 'N• eversiblE damage to this resource and the The prevention and �,l tlga ti an of it r P essthetic, cultural, and historical reservation and enhancement of its natural, of the city. preset and general welfare values is in f u �_ therance of the health, safety, the purpose and intent of this ordinance to 91g, 020. Pur ose and Intent. It is P . ue state local, regional, • d mitigate irreversible damage to this uniq ' and pro - and an 8 . preserve and enhance its value to the public P . and national resource, to essential element in the city's transportation, feet and preserve the system as an es o irdance with the following sewer and water. and recreational systems n acc policies: • e mans ed as a multi --Purpose public (a) The I-iississippi River Corridor shall b f al mineral, resource by conserving the scenic, enviranrnertal, recreationr�.dor economic, cultural, and historic resources and functions of the river cot and providing for the continuation of development of residential and open space uses within the river corridor. . in a manner consistent with The His River Corridor shall be managedi.n accordance (b) *sties and its existing development and its natural characteristz P the Metro olitan Area. wwithre regional plans for the development of P g • in accordance with the Crit' River Corridor shall be managed and (e� The MississippiEnvironmental Policy Act of 1973 cal Areas Act of 1973, the Minnesota • • - - order - Executive Order No. 130 the Governor's critical area designation � federal laws• dated November 19, 1976, and other applicable state and • District. Acritical area overlay 918,030. Establishment of Critical Area over art of the • dant �re Mations. is hereby established as P district with its atten g shall overlay existing ordinance of Maplewood, Minnesota. This district int Shall zoning ordin in the overlay distr • cts so that any parcel of land lying = Terri- . zooming distri , - the underlying established zoningistricts. • alp lay in one or snore of y • to the requirements establish - tory the overlay district shall be subject wood. : tory within . d re Mations of the Cit]G -sof Maple ed by other applicable ordinances an g • permitted in accordance with the he overla district, all uses shall be Within t y _ _ _1 regulations for underlying the underl in zoning district (s) provided, however, that such •�ed to or issued the . uses ,shall not be entitled appropriate development Permit r tints l thev have first satisfied the additional requirements established in this { ordinance. 918.040. District Boundaries. This overlay ordinance shall apply -to the critical areas district whciz is specially delineated on the official Toning map o the of determing the application of- this ordinance to. City of Maplewood dor purposes arcel of -land the above -ref erenced map shall be on f ile in the any, }articular p � d hall be available for in of Tice -.of the Director of Community Development an s sp6ction and copying. 918.050. Definitions* i Critical Area - the area known as the Mississippi River Corridor Critics • - b the Governor. in Executive Order No. 130 dated November, Area designer -Zed y . 1.976. r 1. -� - tion between the amount of land shaded by the vertical �. Crot•�n Cover the ration . branches and foliage area of standing trees to the total projection of the bran g area of land, usually expressed as a percentage. 3. Dimensional Requirement - minimum and maximum setbacks, yard requirements, or structure helg ht or size restriction in the Zoning Ordinance Section. • _ process b which soils are removed by flowing surface 4. Erosion th_ general pr y or sub-surfaze water or wind. 3. Gross Soil. Liss -the average annual .total amount of soil material carried from one acre of land by erosion. 6. • it usually including pumping facilities, for the Lift Station - a facility, y, Y - • - or s tormwa ter runoff to a higher SeWage facility or storm lifting of sewage water runoff facility. 7. - Natural - Rate of Absorption the amount y - nt of stormwater absorbed into the soil duringa storm of once in twenty year occurence. ?I $, • oration, partnership, association or Person - any individual, firm, corporation, other private or governmental entity. 9. • including associated pumps, valves, ri eline -- an underground line of pipe in g s ries P for conveying liquids, gases, control devices and other structures utilized finely divided solids from. one point to - ano ther. sewage or other 10. - ructure utilized to hold a slope in.a position which "Retaining Wall a st _ • = it would not naturally remain in. - 1 j - _ a or offer 'liquids. =Sediment —.suspended matter carried by water, sewage : - 12. • treatment and disposal o'Auman waste Septic Tank - any device for_ the treat waste into the liquid portion of the ' the ercolation of the whicb utilizes p system-which are not contained inside soil including all portions of said _ a buildinng..- a . 2 ago 13. Slope - the inclination of the natural surface of the land from the pori- zontal. 14. Soil - the upper layer of earth which may be dug or plowed; the loose sur- face material of the earth in which vegetation normally grows. l3. Structure -- an tMn manufactured, cons truiction, or --erect 6d which is normally � y � .. -..attached to or positioned on land, i including portable structures. 3.6.-.Suhsta tion -- --& c:y- utility structure -other -than lines, pipelines, holes or t t owe rs . 17. Terrace - a relatively level area bordered on one or more sides by a retain- ing wall. 18. Tree - any woody plant that has at least cne truck whose diameter is four feet above the ground is four inches or greater. j 190 utility Facility - physical facilities of electric, telephone, telegraph, cable television, water, sewer, solid waste, gas, and similar service operations. 20. Vegetation - all plant growth, especially ecially tree, shrubs, mosses and grasses. 21. Water Body - any lake, stream pond, wetland, or river. --. land which is seasonably wet or flooded including all marshes, ?2. etland any ' ')Ss, swamps, and floodplains. 918.060. Site Plan Contents. A. SiteP lans shall be prepared -to a scale appropriate to the size of the project and suitable for the review to be performed. B. The following information ~shall be provided in the site plan: - (1) location of the property including such information as the name and numbers of adjoining roads, railroads,' existing subdivisions, or other landmards. (2) the name and address of owner(s) or developer(s), the section, township and range, northpoint, date and scale of drawing, and number of sheets. g � _ (3) existing topography as indicated on a contour map having a contour interval no greater than 2 feet per contour; the topography map shall Y also clearly delineate an bluff line, all streams, including intermittent _ streams and swales, waterbodies, statement of water_ quality and a class- ificatzon given to - the _ waterbody - by the Minnesota Department of Natural in - Resources --and the Minnesota PCA, if any. The 'topograp i map shall �, .. dicate -the f loodway ---and/or f lood fringe lines. a of the water setting forth in drains a plan delineating existing g which directionstormwater the volume and at what rate storwater is conveyed from the site and setting- forth those areas of the site where stormwater collects and is gradually percolated into the ground or slowly .released to stream or lake. SITE PLANNING REQUIREMENTS. 918.070. Site Plan Required. No building permit, zoning approval or subdivision approval permit or certificate shall be issued for any action located in an area covered by this ordinance until a site plan has been prepmred and approved In accordance with the provisions of this ordinance. -Y 918.080s.. Exception,, A. Wo site plan shall be required for an existing single-family dwelling nor for the extension, enlargement, change or alteration thereof, nor accessory structures thereto, provided that the dwelling remains a single-family dwelling. B. No site plan shall be required for any use permitted on a temporary basis for a period not to exceed two years wher such use is established without . site preparation and makes no discharge on to the site. No extensions shall be granted beyond the two-year temporary permit. 918.090. Site Plan Application.- A written application for site plan approval shall be filed with the Director of Conrnunity Deve] opment containing evidence adequate to show that the proposed use will conform to the standards set forth in this ordinance. Three . (3) sets of clearly legible blue or black -lined copies or drawings and required information shall be submitted to the Director of Community g Development and shall be accompanied by an application fee of $30.00. (5) a description of the soils of the site ir:cluding a map indicating soil types by areas to be disturbed as well as a soil report prepared by a soil scien- tist containing information on the suitability of the soils for the type of development proposed and for the type of sewage disposal proposed and de- scribing any remedial. steps to be taken by .the developer to render the soils suitable. All areas proposed for grading shall be identified by soil type, both as to soil type of existing top soil and soil type of the new contour. The location and extent of any erosion area shall be indicated. The stabil- ity of rock units along bluff lines shall be included in the soils descript- ion. (6) a description of the flora and fauna, which occupy the site or are occasion- ally found thereon, setting forth with detail those areas where unique plant or animal species may be found on the site. (7) a description of any features, 'buildings or areas which are of his torin significance. (8) a� map indicating proposed finished grading shown at contours at the same intervals as provided above or as _ required to- clearly _indicate the relat- ibnship of proposed changes to existing to _pgra�hy and rema (9) 8 landscape - y.. ;ing features. -plan drawn to an appropriate scale, including dtnensions and p e distances and the location, type, size and description of all existing • vegetation, clearly locating and .describing any vegetation proposed for re- moval and all proposed -landscape materials whicb will be added to the site as part of the -development. . — 4 — (lo) a proposed drainage plan of the developed site delineating in which direction, the volume, and at what rate stormwater will be conveyed from the site and setting forth the areas of the site where stormwater will be allowed to • collect and gradually percolate into the ground, or be slowly released to stream or lake. The plan shall also set forth hydraulic capacity of all drainage structures -to be constructed or existing structures to be utilized, including volume of holding ponds and design storm. = (11) an erosion and sedimentation control plan indicating the tyke, location, and necessary technical_ information on control measures to 16e taken both during and after construction including a statement expressing the calcu- lated anticipated gross soil loss ea -pressed in tons/acre/year both during and of ter construction. (12) the proposed size, alignment, height and intended use of any structures to. be erected er located on the site. (13) a clear delineation of all areas which sh-all be paved or surfaced including a description of the surfacing material to be used. (14) a description of the method to be providei for vehicular and pedestrian access to tle proposed development and public access to the river and/or public river -view opportunities both before and after development: a des- cription of the. development's impact on existing views of and along the river. =A15) a description of all parking facilities to be provided as part of the de- velopment of the site including an analysis of parking needs generated by the proposed development. (16)a delineation of the area or -areas to be dedicated for public use. (17) a delineation of the location and amounts of excavated. soils to be stored ' on the site during construction. (18) any other information pertinent to the particular project which in the opinion of the Director of Community Development or applicant is necessary or helpful for the review of the pro j ec-t. _ • . r (19) the Directox of Community Development may waive any of the above require- ments that are not applicable. 918.100. Site Plan Approval, The Director of Community Development shall approve or deny all applications, except those that would normally need approval by the City Council.-. If the applicant is -not satisfied with the decision of the Dir- ector of Community Development, the decision may be appealed to the City Council after at recommendation from the Planning Commission. 918,110. .Site Plan Approval Standards. No site plan which fails toa satisfy the follow1gg standards shall be approved by the City Council or-DirMtor of Com- munity Development. _ A. The applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed development shall be . P, lanned designed, constructed and maintained to avoid substantial probab- ilities of i � � (1) accelerated erosion. (2) pollution, contamination, or siltation of water bodies, rivers and streams (3) damage to vegetation. (4) injury to wildlife habitats. .x . s (5) increased flood potential. _ ({) decreased ground water recharge. B. The applicant shall demonstrate that the types and densities of land use. proposed shall be suited to the site and soil conditions and sball not present a threat to the maintenance. of the groundwater quality, a potential increase in maintenance cost of utilities, parking areas, or roads, and shall not be subject to problems due to soil, limitations, including, ;but not limited to . soil bearing strength, shrink/swell potential, and excessive frost movement. C. No development shall be permitted on land having a slope before alteration in excess of 12 percent unless the applicc--nt sball prove that the following conditions are met: • (1) The foundation and underlying material of any structure, including roads, sball be adequate for the slope condition and soil type. (2) Adequate controls and protections exist uphill from the proposed develop - meet such that there is no danger of structures or roads being struck by s fallin rock, mud, uprooted trees, or other materials. (3) The proposed development presents no danger of falling rock, mud,. up- rooted trees, or other materials to structures doumbill. (4) The view of the developed slope f rom the river .and opposite riverbank is consistent with the natural appearance of the undeveloped slope, consistent with any historic areas nearby, compatible with the view from historic areas, and compatible with surrounding architectural feat- ures. To the maximum extent possible, the use of natural devices, in S vegetation etation management shall bet preferred over the construction 8 of artificial devices, including culverts, holding Ponds, walls, and terracing. (5) All other structures other than buildings and roadway surfaces, but including retaining walls shall meet the following design requirements: (a) retaining walls or terrace contours shall not exceed f ive f eet in height; (b) con struction materials shall be subj ect to Commuj&ty Design Review Board approval; _ . - _ �. ___ - - _ - �. _ ,..,-_ - - s (c)the minimumsPace in between terraces and retaining walls shall be twenty feet. —6— the sloe development with local Any lift ft stations required to service P tandards sewer systems are designed in accordance with Local design s- • The applicant shall furnish a satzs and approved by the city engineer. which the cost of maintenance and arrangement or agreen.)est by wh the facility* factory g those serviced by • f the lift station are borne by operation o ` The e o f greater ttan 12 . tank shall be placed on a slop g •c tank (7) No septic where the *ePti slope may -not be altered in any way -_ small be natural p s stem or part thereof is to be. located* The drain � Lines y arellel to con � located p tour lines. . in excess of 45% be ($) In n0 case e shall slopes with a natural slope developed. only 3.n such a manner that on .gross "� Development shall be accomplished ° y D. Develop 5 tons per acre per year during • shall not exceed f lve (� a site is soil loss levels per year when th • but only two (2) tons per acme p y per -acre per year construction, . or water course and 0.5. -tons adjacent to a water body ed. ' J after constr uction activities are complet • e scientific, historical, not substantially diminsh the and unique £, Development shall aesthetic value of natural areas q educational. recreational or sesth alter the reproductive educate and Shall not substantially plant and ai:imal species, - cycle of the species. ma }:imam use of natural in veg- • protection measures shall make site as erosion control F. Erosion pro the lacing of new vegetation on si et ation rati�er than P devices shall be preferred • The use of natural erosion control drainage devices f ac�.lit1eS • e co�zstructi on of artif lcal g the maximum extent over tb. to including culverts, molding ponds, and ditches. . as to minimize the removal G The development shall be located in such a manner . ion of the natural topography• of vegetation and alteration -- - no feasible or prudent alter - ate t shall demonstrate that there are be permitted only �, The appl1cal� he site: development shall p natives to cutting trees on t • trees shall be p reserved. No that the maximum number of in which in such a manner in the actual physical space may be cut except those occupy g In the event that solar trees y drive or roadway is to be erected. .est sunlight to the a structure, may be cut to allow sufficient collection is utilized, treesy there are no feasible or ors if the applicant can demonstratetees shall be re - solar collect are cut, the denisty of t prudent dent alternatives* if treesbut in no case shall the which existed before development, per acre. The stored to that the density above 10 trees p applicant be required to raiseich takes place will be con- 8PP onstrate that a11_ grading wh stability of applicant -shall dem a root Bone, aeration and _ reserves the _ - ducted In a- manner that _p_ _ _ - tin area equal to at least one- - - and _ rovides_ an adequate watering - exists.ng_ gees t e=. ry half of -each tree s crown cov = T. greater educe the existing c:_cown. cover S in woodlands shall mot.r- mann That the understorY Z, Developmentalt be co-n- and onducted in such a - - than 50 percent and s . - and litter is preseryed. ! excess storage and nutrient wetland . shall not . exceed the - a _ _ _ . - . - - ltimateproject ed develop- . _ • J. dishing~ -in _ -- - - the wetlatia��based ontt�e v stripping capacities of t Pp 7 - N. went of the wetland watershed. Flood storage and nutrient stripping capaci- ties shall be calculated in accordance with Appendix B. 9 Wetlands and other water bodies shall not be used as primary sediment traps during or of ter construction. The proposed development will not increase the runoff ratFe or decrease the natural rate of absorption of stormwa ter. :. i �,. :.The quality of water runoff and water infiltrated to the water table or .w aquifer shall be as high after development as it was before development of the site. Tom:. When filling in a wetland, a minimum amount of filling may be allowed when b necessary but in no case shall the following restrictions on total amount of filling be exceeded. Since the total ,amount of filling which can be per- mitted is limited y the Cit of Maplewood, when considering permit appli cat- ions, shall consider the equal apportionment of fill opportunity \to riparian land owners. .; 1. Total filling shall not cause the total natural flood storage capacity of the wetland to fall below the projected volume of runoff from fte whole developed wetland watershed generated by a 6" rainfall in 24 hours. y An increase in runoff must be detained for on-site infiltration through the soil to the water table. 2 Total filling shall not cause the total natural nutrient stripping capacity of the wetland to fall below the nutrient production of the wetland watershed for its projected development. Only 3. fill free of chemical pollutants and organic wastes may be used. GNo P art of any septic tank system shall be located closer than 150 feet • from the edge of a water body or water course unless it can be shoum that no effluent will directly or indirectly reach the -water body, water course or wetland. The development is consistent with the reasonable preservation of the �. P view of the river corridor from other properties and by the public rigi,ts- of-way has been minimized. .Q The grades of any streets shall not exceed 10 percent. An and all erosion control, stormwater runoff, utility access, and R. y similar structures shall be designed to be maintained, cleaned out, and s _ otherwise operated without requiring the crossing of private lands wit or -1 • P0. vehicles and equipment, such as the operation of motorized heavy maintenanceq trucks and back -hoes on slopes in excess of 8_ percent. As used bulldozers, , n this section, private lands includes any out -lots. 4r"I . C o S. The proposed development, -: both vehicular nd pedestrian, s�all be adequate i - and .consistent with local transportation and thouroughfare planning. i . t The proposed development shall not lessen public access to and along the T. luf f nor does it lessen public opportunity to view the river from river b , _-- - - witbin the corridor. ..8- r U. The conduct of all grading, landscaping, structure placement, and street routing shall be consistent with and to the maximum, extent in furtherance z of the goals and policies for the development of the river corridor adopted by the City of Maplewood on -March 1, 1979. • CRITICAL AREA CROSSINGS. ;i - 918.120o'- Utilit Facilities: Utility crossings of the critical area corridor or routingwithin the corridor shall meet the following standards: ,i r A. _--Underground placing of the utility facility shall be required unless econ- omic, technological and land characteristic factors make underground place - Ment feasible. Economic considerations alone shall not be made the major determinant regarding feasibility. B. Overhead crossings, if required, shall meet the following criteria: (1) The crossings shall be adjacent to or part of an .existing utility • corridor, including bridge or overhead utility lines. (2) All structures utilized shall be as compatible as practicable with land use, scenic views, and existing transmission structures in beigzt, material, color, and design. . (3). Right of way clearance shall be kept to a minimum. (4) Vegetative screening shall be utilized to the maximum extent co isistent with safety requirements. (5) Routing shall avoid unstable soils, blufflines, or high ridges, the alteration of the natural environment, including grading shall ::oe minimized. .(b) The crossings be subject to the site planning requirements set f orth Article II. l CO utility Substations. Utility substations shall be subject to the following standards: . (1) All substations shall be subject to the site planning requirements set forth in Article II. New substations or refurbishment of existing substations shall be com- (2) . patible in height, scale, building materials, landscaping and signing _ with surrounding natural environment or land uses. Screening by - a - natural means is encouraged and should be compatible with the surrounds en_viro_ nm_ ent. -- _ _ _ _ _ __ Pipelines. - Pipelines and underground utility facilit# shall be subject _ - to the following standards: (1) All pipelines and underground facf :.ities shall be subject to the site planning requirements set forth in Article 918.070. _ (2)The facilities shall be located to avoid wetlands, woodlands, and areae of unstable soils. -9- (3) All underground placing of utility facilities and pipelines shall be followed by revesetation and rehabilitation to the conditions which existed on site prior to development providing the original conditions were environmentally and aesthetically desirable. 9.18..130. Public and Private Roads. New roads crossing the critical area corridor or routed within the. critical area corriwithindor shall meet the following standards: imine impacts on the��natural terrain and A. Roads shall be constructed to min p natural landscape. - i; B. Extreme cuts and f ills are to be avoided. • he site planning requirements set forth in C. All roads shall be subsect to t sP nS Article 918.470. river corridor as a convenient right-of-way D. New roads shall not utilize the for new arterials. E. New roads shall be restric ted to those facilities needed to access existing andlanned residential uses. P 4 • res the location, or the use of 918..340. Existilig Structures. Existing structu , - with this ordinance or the critical areas designation which is inconsistent order shall not be eligible y ' ble for an permit granted by the City for expansion, an a of use renewal of existing permit, or building permit, unless the ch g , t following cr-:teria are met: A. The applicant shall provide and maintain adequate screening of the structur+ from the water through the use of natural vegetative means. � 'ver and river corridor from existing B. The public s ability to view the river activit hall not be further degraded by the proposed y public streets s 918.150. Suns • A. All advertising signs permitted within the critical area shall conform wi tih theP rovisions of the Maplewood Sign Ordinance. B. Views of the water from vistas public ublic roads shall not be impaired by theP lacement of business or advertising signs. on of which is not in conformance with C. All advertising signs, the location n are deemed non—conforming uses and shall be removed within this sectio three years of the effective date of this ordinance. ON SITE SEWER DISPOSAL* -- following regulations are adopted to: 918�1b0. Purpose and Intent, The foll g g _ •, as to revent contamination of A - Regulate -individual sewer disposal systems P _ � water. • g ' f water, streams or other surface ='bodies o underground bodies a , -- creatin 8 health hazard Prevent individual sewer disposal systems from 8 B, .and/or a nuisance for the general public or for individuals. •R - 10 - 918.170. General Requirements. A. Location and installation of the individual sewage disposal system and each part tbereo f shall be such that, with reasonable maintenance it will function in a sanitary manner ne and will not create a nuisance nor endanger the safety water su 1 in determining a suitable location for the of any domestic a PP y ' ' on shall be even to the size an shape of the lot,slope system, considerate S nd finished grade, soil permeability, dep tl of ground water, of natural a ` future water supplies,. accessibility for geology, proximity to existingor maintenance, and possible expansion of the system. No part of the supply, or so water supply. s stem shall be located ted so that it is nearer to any water � Y that surface drainage from its location may reach any domestic C Raw sewage, septic tank effluent, or seepage from a soil absorption system • ed to the round surface, abondoned wells, or Bodies shall not be discharg g of surface water, or into any rock formation the structure of which is not • f water b filtration, or into any well or other conducive to Purification o Y l to the .,disposal excavation in the ground. This requirement shall not a pp y ith recess approved by the State Board of Bealt of sewage in accordance w a P P or the Water Pollution Control Commission. • or more to permit installation of the individ- ual The _lot size shall be 3 acres • requirements � ertainin� dis disposal system in accordance with all the req ual sewage P � thereto* e disposal osal s stems shall not be mad -,----t in low E. Installation of individual sewag F systems swampyareas or areas which may be subject to flooding. _ e or where limestone or any F. In areas with high ground water table geological or earth, • fault is covered by less than fifty (50) feet formation similarly y e a title field. The bottom of the trenches the final disposal unit shall b or calculated of less than four (4} f eet above the highest known shall ben . water table or the surface of the faulty rock formation. G. Bulldozers, trucks, or other heavy machinery shall not be driven over the system after installation. i A. The system or systems shall be designed to receive all sewage from the dwelling, building dr waste • or other establishment served, including laundry g and basement floor drainage. Footing or roof drainage shall not enter any - part of the system. Where the construction of additional bedrooms, the . - or other factors likely to affect the . installation of .mechanical equipment, installation of the system can be reasonably anticipated, the operation of Y a s stem adequate for such anticipated need shall be required. uired. Y building sewer, a septic tank, and a soil . The system shall consist of a bu g sub -surface .absorption unit. The soil absorption unit shall consist of.a e treated in the sic tank and the disposal field. All sewage shall b y d The Septic P effluent shall = be discharged to the disposaal fie . septic tank ed the only s�cceptable .sycrem for tank drain field system shall be consider Y _... feasible installation unless it can be demonstrated that this system is not it can be deomonstrated that the P on the a rticular lot in question and if roblem. system being proposed as an alternate will not create a pollution P J. Soil absorption systems for the disposal of sewage waste to sh _ stalled on land wi�ere the slo a e(12Z),, all not be j P exceeds twelve Percnt 918.170. 11aintenance Requirements, nts. A. At least once aear y the owner of any septic tank o . measure or arrange for measure r his agent shall vent of the depth of sludge and scum ' - septic tank. When, as a result o 1n s, layer in the f such measureme8t the to of t}1 tank or any compartment of the P e sludgy twelve (12) inches below tank s found to be less tha the bottom of teh outlet -baffle ` or is the bottom of the scum 1 or submerged i ayer is less than three (3 inch P bottom cf the septic tank outletes above t baffle or submerged i e th agentshall arrange for �' �' � e ot��ner or from g r the removal and sanitary disposal the tank, provided that such re P of sludge and • requirement for measuring shall be w for any septic tank which is cleaneda�, as indicated at least once ear year. h cal, B• At least once each year the of Jeer of any system equipped with a distr • box shall arrange for the opening lbu of any settled P g of the distribution box and the rem solids therein, , Such material shallova. septic tank or by other mean '' be disposed of to the s acceptable to the City, C. At least once between Ila y 3 and June 30 of each year the de t • in each seepage pit shall be measur P h °f llquZd ed. �,�hen, as a result of such measu menu it is found that the liquid level re in the pit is less than one foot below the inlet, a second measurement shall be made eight (8) to twelve hours after the first measurement { discharged to , during which time no liquid s�;aZl �, the seepage pit. If, as a result e it is fund that the -liquid of the second measurement q level in the pit has not lowered at • e least two (2) feet faring the indicated to period of time, an additional see a e i p ble soil absorption system shall P g P t o: other acceptable be provided. D. servicing of septic tanks and soil absorption units shall conform to t Minnesota Department of Health and Minnesota Pollutionhe Control Age ifications. Disposal of sludge and ncy spec g scum removed from the system shall be: (1) into a sewer munici al ' P r disposal system where practible. (2) in I:he absence of ae ublic sewer, .war, at a disposal site approved b the Pollution Control Agency, Y (3) sludge shall not be dischared land witho g into any lake or water—course, nor u on ut burial. P 918.180. Alternative -Systems. A. Alternative methods of sewage g disposal such as holding tanks electric or gas incinerators biological and/or tertian disposal systems, wherever re u Y treatment .plants or land q fired or allowed in particular circumstances shall be subject to the standards. criteria, , rules and�"ke ala tions of the Pollution -i Minnesota Department of Health and Minnesotag -Control Agency; and shall baso require approval of the Ci R ty Council. 12 r f;ordinance shall take of f ect after its p assa a and ublication. . Section 2... This 4i Passed b Y the City Council. { of the City of Naplewood, zi Minnesota, this 1st day of Ila rch, 1979. f lee to Mayor Attest: (.00, ORDINANCE N0. 503 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 918 AND 1004 OF THE MAPLEWOOD CODE RELATING TO THE CRITICAL AREA OVERLAY0 DISTRICT AND PLATTING CODE Y THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLE WOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: - , dCode is heYeby, amended by adding SECTION 1SECTION 918.050 of the Maplewood newsubparagraphs 23 and 24, to read as follows: , . o of a slope with direct drainage 3. bluffline - a line delineating a top Dints at which 2 ver or Fish Cree, connecting the p to the Mississippi River kMore than one bluffline may the slope becomes less than 18 percente, edin landward from the river). be encountered proce g Section 211.010 of the City Code. 24. Park Dedication Fee - as defined in •Code is hereby amended to read SECTION 2. SECTION 918.110 of the Maplewood as follows: site plan which fails to satisfy 918*110* SITE PLAN APPROVAL STANDARDS. No s P or Director of Com- the following standards shall be approved by the City COunCl munity Development. • of 18 percent or greater which A. No development shall be permitted on slopes, P Fish Creek. • o the Mississippi River Bluffs or are in direct drainage t o f . community DeVeloprnent. Refer to map on file with the Director �sissi i River bluff s or Fish $. In areas not in direct drainage to the Psis PP than 40 ercent. Creek, no development" shall be allowed on slopes greater (Refer t • map on file le with the Director of Community Development. drainage to the Mississippi River be permitted' o meet whether or not in direct g slo e, before C. No Bevel p � on land having a P Bluffs or Fish Creek, shallapplicant proves the follow - in pp alteration, in excess of 12 percent unless the in conditions are met: • ial of any structure, including (1) The foundation and underlaying mater Q condlt ion and soil type- be ade uate for the slope roads, shall i st uphill from the proposed controls and protections ex P tures or roads being (2) Adequatet there is no danger of structures . development such that - struck by falling rock, mud, uprooted trees, or other materials. -_ _ - - - - - o f fal l ung rock, mud g _propose --development presents no danger � 1 (3) The _prop - erials to structures d�nhil uprooted trees, or other mat - _ he river and osite river- view of the developed slope f rom t the undeveloped C4) The appearance of bank is consistent with the natural app compatible with • with an historic areas nearby, come architect slope, consistent Y • and compatible with surrounding _ -the view from historic areas, ossible, the use of natural ural features. • To the maximum extent p referred over -- - --. _ _ -.-- _ _ , vegetation management shall e P in devices, -including 8 es including culverts, holding e construction of artificial devices, ponds, Walls, and terracing. - (5) All other structures other than buildings and roadway surfaces, but including retaining walls shall meet the following design requirements: (a) retaining walls or terrace contours shall not exceed five feet in height; (b) construction materials shall be subject to Community Design Review Board . approval ; (c) the minimum space in between terraces and retaining walls shall -+ be twenty feet. () Any 6 lift stations required to service the slope development with local sewer systems are designed in accordance with local design stand. ards and approved by the City Engineer. The applicant shall furnish a satisfactory arrangement or agreement by which the cost of-mainten— ance and operation of the lift station are borne by those serviced by the facility. •(7) The No septic tank• shall be placed on a slope of greater than 12'x. natural slope may not be altered in any way where the septic tank system or part thereof is to be located. The drain lines shall be located parallel to contour lines. D. The applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed development shall be planned, designed, constructed and maintained to avoid substantial probabilities of: (1) accelerated erosion (2) pollution, contamination, or siltation of water bodies, rivers and streams (3) damage to vegetation (4) injury to wildlife habitats (5) increased flood potential (b) decreased ground water recharge E. The applicant shall demonstrate that the types and densities of land use proposed shall be suited -to the site and soil conditions and shall not present a threat to the maintenance of the groundwater quality, a potential increase in maintenance costs of utilities, parking areas, or roads, and shall not be subject to problems due to soil, limitations, including, but not limited to soil bearing strength, shrink/swell potential, and excessive frost movement. F. AlV new- structures and roads shall be placed no closer than 40 feet from a blt-f f 1 ine. Exceptions shall be: (IX Public recreation facilities, scenic overlooks, public "servation" platforms, or public trail systems ilt� s- Z The construction of above—ground pumping stations for sewer lines, such ii $ stations shall be screened from view from the river. (3) Other development, when the applicant can conclusively demonstrate that neither construction of final development will negatively impact slopes with a grade of 18 percent or greater. _ _ _ G. Development shall - be accomplished only in such a manner that on-site gross soil loss levels shall not exceed f ive (5) tons per acre per year during construction, but only two (2) tons per acre per year when the site is adjacent to a water body or water course and 0.5 tons per acre per year after construction activities are completed. r H. Development shall not substantially dimish the scientific, historical, educational, recreational or aesthetic value of natural areas and unique plant and animal species, and shall not substantially al -ter the reproductive t cycle of the species. !I. Erosion protection measures shall make maximum use of natural inplace vegetation rather than the placing of new vegetation, on site as erosion control facilities. The use of natural erosion control devices shall be preferred to the maximum extent over the construction of artificial drainage devices including culverts, holding ponds, and ditches. J. The development shall be located in such a manner as to minimize the removal l of vegetation and alteration of the natural topography. K. The applicant shall demonstrate that there are no feasible or prudent alternatives to'cutting trees on the site: development shall be permitted only in such a menner that the maximum number of trees shall be preserved. No trees may be cut except those occupying the actual physical space in which a structure, drive or roadway is to be erected. In the event that solor collection is utilized, trees may be cut to allow sufficient sunlight to the solar collectors if the applicant can demonstrate there are no ' feasible or prudent alternatives. If trees are cut, the density of trees shall be restored to that which existed before development, but in no case shall the applicant be required to raise the density above 10 trees per acre. The applicant shall demonstrate that all grading which takes place will be conducted in a manner that preserves the roof zone aeration and stability of existing -trees and provides an adequate watering area equal to at least one—half of -each tree's crown cover. L. -Development in woodlands shall not reduce the existing crown cover greater than 50 percent and shall be conducted in such a manner that the understory and litter is preserved. M. Fishing fna wetland shall not exceed the excess storage and nutrient stripping capacities of the wetland based on the ultimate projected develop— ment 'of the wetland watershed. Flood storage and nutrient stripping capac— ities shall be calculated in accordance with Appendix Be ISI.' Wetlands and other water bodies shall not be used as primary sediment traps during or after construction. _ _o; The proposed development will not increase. the - runoff rate- or decrease {: the natural rate of absorption of stormwater. t P._ The quality of water runoff and water infiltrated to _the mater table or - aquifer -shall be as high after development as it was before development of the site. Q. When filling in a wetland, 'a minimum amount of filling may be allowed �--- _ wfen necessary -but in no case shall the following restrictions on total amount of filling be exceeded.. Since the total amount of filling which be permitted is limited, the City of Maplewood, when considering permit - applications, shall consider the equal apportionment of fill opportunity to reparian land owners. , (1) Total filling shall not cause the total natural flood storage capacity of the wetland to fall below the projected volume of runoff from the whole developed wetland- watershed generated by 8'7 b" rainfall in 24 hours. Any increase in runoff must be detainjd for on-site infiltration through the soil to the water table. g 2 Total fillip shall not cause the total natural nutrient stripping ) capacity of the wetland to. fall below the nutrient production of the wetland watershed for its projected development. 3 Only fil free of chenical pollutants and organic wastes may be used. C ) Y R. Noan art of tic tank system shall be located closer than 150 feet from P Y septic the edge of a water body or water course unless it can be shown that no effluent ,ftwill directly or indirectly reach the water body, water course or wetland. S. The grades of any streets shall not exceed 10 percent. T. Any and all erosion control, stormwater runoff, utility access, and similar structures shall be designed to be maintained, cleaned out, and otherwise operated without requiring the crossing of private lands with or the operation of motorized heavy maintenance vehicles and equipment, such as bulldozers, .trucks, ucks and back -hoes on slopes in excess of 8 percent. As used in this section., private lands includes any out -lots. U. The proposed development, both vehicular and pedestrian, shall be adequate and consistent with local transportation and thoroughfare planning. V. Thero osed development shall not lessen public access to and along the river P P bluff, nor does it lessen public opportunity to view the river from wilthin the corridor. W. Developmentproposed along the Fish Creek Corridor shall be subject to the provisions of the City's Flood PLain Ordinance. X. The conduct of all8 rading landscaping, structure placement, and street routing shall be consistent with and to the maximum extent in furtherance of the goals and policies for the development of the.river corridor adopted by the City of Maplewood on March 1, 1979. SECTION 39 SECTION 918.170 is amended to read as follows: SLtCTION 918.170 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS. The guidelines set forth in 6MCAR4.8040 shall serve as the minimum standards and criteria for the desig t f ormeLr1y WPC 40 n, ) location, installation, use and maintenance of individual sewage treatment systems. NS 918.170 Maintenance Requirements) and 9,18.1.80 (Alternative . SECTION 4. SECTIO ( Q _ systems) are renumbered to Sections 918.180 and 918.190, respect ii�ely. SECTION 5. SECTION 1004.080 of the City Platting Code is hereby amended by adding a new subsection (3), to read as follows: (e) Within the legal boundaries of the City's designated Critical Area the City Council may require dedication for ' public open space or, scenic ease- ment, blufflands which are 18 percent or greater in slope and which are Mississippi River Bluffs or Fish Greek. The i - n direct drainage to thePP City Council may release the developer in part or in total from a park • lieu of the value of the above dedicated bluf f lan s. dedication fee in 1 take.effect upon its passage and publication. SECTION 6. This ordinance steal t P Passed by the City Council , of the City of Maplewood, this= 21st day of May, 1981. ...•iiia , a o Attest: CleIrk Ayes - 5 Nays — 0 --COMPARISON--OF COSTS - AND _LOTS. AT VARYING- LOT SIZES G 711dA r - - i TD le - �T 000 4 y-o�_oo0 - - - `TATA C..._____ 1 -- - -- - -0 CX0 Zo a.0a - 5 6 -�-�s_�_E� 31 � Sp � EvJ I4 o 5 zI �t j���^ smb;_ C W E� I y i _� z_. zoo I 1 Z_o'3�--1bo Toa q -L �-s�� so_____ I 0 .0 1 _Z._ - - --, 0 i Z o0o i i 151 �_� � _Z _o -- Z$ oo —S 00 _ --- I IO3 X38: / _I�5�4� 53Z. _ 1: — AC.. _ 13p+1SiG C.o 1� 35 �3L _ Z os `� 3G. o�g Z2 1i Zai 3S� i a , � $ -t 1 r _ d 1- } 20 I + G i A IV C.i' V r' ✓.. r O I ` t 3 -- --- - - - - - -- - - - REFE T TEEN 1 LO ED MAPS 26 - - -- �- 28 - ,..._ 29 30 3i K- 33 _ - -_ - - - - -- - ---- -- - - --- -- - - - 334 - -- - -- -- -- -- - - 4 10,00C SQUARE FOOT LOT EONCEPT w Date: • i.� -��� 1 4 tY"t�,�#�s+'yl�i `. �iR?as`�..MyyERi'Cw�� s W � 1�, ^ a" �y�^�.i? .fir'. �n [t► 'Y *a, 7'" _' 3_''�OP`'�' `r.`q.V _. ��•yyF,.?,. _+�C+,, ''�. �J_��`^Wi�w� •. wx�.d.M�.iO+.%.� ������'I+' .aii�iN��`�"•.�r4y.Mi'Yl�fYw.6. Y•�_ ... *•.r � ys_ • f. � � K n.�,`•N"a`f.-;^�1 414 •`. Mill lr Imo• wil Y f f a' ' ` • f• • f • a �_ • +�'y"�"'�"��i..F"tadca'4a>rz .-..:' .� �, ti >_rs � "r '"" 'SP' �.,, t • . •� x ' iv •�� Y • _ •v t 1 I 7 SC� • Y r - • • • • 10,00C SQUARE FOOT LOT EONCEPT w Date: • i.� -��� 1 • -• of • • -4000, • �'z 4r. N. . 3 • # • t. ft • �rr�•WA� mo amp wmmmm�ommum 20,000 SQUARE FOOT LOT CONCEPT • Date: 1 N- 309000 SQUARE FOOT LOT CONCEPT • Date: I t r _- 409000 SQUARE FOOT LOT CONCEPT, SPECIAL DENSITY LOT CONCEPT Is: Dat•: SURVEY OF ADJACENT CITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCES OR ZONING DISTRICTS Woodbury must be dedicated ca ted to the City.-, Vo Any wetland over one acre other environmental ordinances or zoning districts. . Newport: No environmental ordinances or zoning districts St. Paul: Critical Area ordinance Si e Plan review is required for slopes over 18%0 t No other environmental ordinances or zoning districts Rosevi 11 e: a strict shoreland.ordinance. Environmental concerns The City has in other areas are taken care of through the site plan review process --no specific ordinance or zoning district for environmental . protection. Little Canada: Could not get an answer Vadnais Heights • reservation of .wetlands shown on their drain- age City requires the p n- age plan. y The have no other ordinances or zoning districts for environmental protection. White Bear Lake: No environmental ordinances or zoning districts North St. Paul A developed city. 1 r+ •• • j ir•i'\r�f ' � •tom � � w` bAAPLE. OD s ��''� =�•. T Y ROAD B MAPL.EWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109 1902 EAST COUNT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPM ENT 77045.60 April 2, 1982 a i s considering n raising the minimum lot area for new The City Cound 1 g 0 000 square sin Ma l ewood , south of Lower Afton Roads from 1 q development P to 20,0009 30,000, or 40,000 square feet. The enclosed map shows the area being studiede i n the minimum lot area is to create large lot The purpose of raising i neighborhoods. with more open space, that preserve the unique natural V. ap Teatures of south cl • lewood. The disadvantage is that it would increase the pri ce of new 1 ots . In order to help the Cy it Council come to a decision, would you please answer the following 9 questions 1. Do you favor increasing the minimum lot areas in the area on the enclosed map? YesIL No 2. If you favor the increase, what s • should be the minimum lot area for your neighborhood, including your lot? 20,000 square feet square feet wait Jec z!;'30,000 40,000 square feet --Thank you .for your asst stance. Please ease return this form in the enclosed - -- it envelope by April 16. Very truly yours,40 �y Ge f Olson, AICP Director of Community Development /jW L Li I n J.B HHOO 612 • 291 • 2794 314 RYAN AVENUE ST. PAUL, MN. 55102 - .Y w April 12, 1982 Mr. Geoff Olson Director of Community Development Maplewood., Minnesota Dear Geoff, pp I would like to express my opposition to the change of lot specifications South of Lower Af ton Road in the strongest possible terms. This proposal is diametricly opposed to the present thrust of planning practice and is very likely the most far reaching p in step that the Council could take to render • e of forts that 'all of us in the housing industry are making ineffective th to produce residential units that are affordable for the average American family. We will oppose this proposal with all of the energies at our disposal. Yo riE , Y, R.. ;� Schwichtenberg operties �_ T MINUTES- OF THE MAPLEWOOD HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY April 13 1982 1902 EAST COUNTY ROAD B9 14APLEWOOD v 1 - Call to Order Chairman Fischer called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. 2. Roll Call Lorraine Fischer Lucille Bryant Guy Glover Greg Sc hmi t _ Ronald Smith •L " h . of Lower Afton R RE Geoff Olson, Director of _8D, Rezoning_ at the Counci 1 has requested the Planning Communi ty Devel opment, n ca e i n the southern portion Commission to consider the potential of estate lot •ioni ng ' Councilpersons Maida and Juker were in attendence. of the City. P from the Council as to whether the intent Staff i s asking for further direction 'tics of this • is to protect the unique environmental characteristics of this request P hi was opposed to the or to create elite neighborhoods. The membership pP - area of creating elite establishment of large lot districts for the primary purpose • roach is an environmental overlay district net ghborhoods. The preferred app � n the cost which would preserve natural features without arbitrarily increasing of housing. • r Schmit seconded to direct Charman Fischer motioned and Commissioner staff to prepare an environmental p the specific protection ordinance that would protect ' staff report. It is felt the other -al ter - natural features recommended � n the s p • 'le providing a lesser degree of nate v es woul d only add to housing costs, �whi p g protection for the environment. • - - Commissioner Glover was absent.'. = Motion carried unanimously. t T D. RE District in the South Leg ' Secretary Olson said the City Council requested the Planning Commission a report of the property south of Lower. Afton Road that could be considered for RE districts. Staff is recommending an envi ro prepare • P ' �� nmental a be prepared that would protect the sped fi c natural _protection ordinance p p `features as outlined in their report. w reviewed proposed lot layouts for property and Public Works DirectorP P "the costs that would be involved with the various improvements for the property. PP A roximately 40 acres of land were used in the developments. He9 ave the costs per lot for the various sized lots. Commissioner Fischer said the HRA indicated they wished to have the tool applied not only in the leg of the City b,it also thoughout the City where appropriates Chairman Prew asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment on the proposal. Kurt Schwi chtenberg, 314 Ryan ' Avenue, owner of property on Linwood Avenue. He did not think the RE zoning would apply to his property. The Commission has approved a RLE zoning for his property, however the plat was not approved because the utilities were not planned for the complete parcel. Because of costs involved for the improvements, they have to replan the townhouse_ area. The Commission discussed with Secretary Olson how an environmental protection ordinance would be enforced and what would be included in the ordinance. The Commission questioned how many large lots have been di vi-ded and developed and also what type of development is presently under construction in the southern leg. Staff indicated that the majority of development has been townhouse type development. The Commission indicated they thought an environmental protection ordinance could be applied throu hoot the -city. They also said some indication shoul d be made on zone ng/planning maps to inform people of this ordinance when they are requesting information on property with the intent to purchase it. Commissioner Pel 1 i sh moved the Ci ter Counci 1 _direct staff to are an environmental protection .ordinance for entire Cit that woul d _.preprotect the ' s eci Ti c natural features recommended in staffs: or dated `A ri 1 9, 1982 ommi ss oner Barrett seconded Ayes - Commissioners Barrett, Fischer, Howard, Pell i sh, Frew, S1 etten, Whitcomb. y MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Associate Pl anner--Johnson SUBJECT: Lot Division Appeal -_ LOCATION: 840 McKnight Road APPLICANT/OWNER: Julia Lepsche _ DATA: June 7, 1982 Request. Appeal to the City Council to reduce the area to be included in a storm water ponding easement required as condition of a staff approved lot division. Background On May 12, 1982, staff conditionally approved an administrative lot division creating three parcels (map two). The 1.1 acre easement illustrated on Map two was required to conform with the intent of the Drainage Plan. A portion of a seven acre-foot storm water pond is proposed for the appl-i cant's . property (Map Three) . The exact Tocati on of the pond cannot be determined until site plans are approved for the adjoining undeveloped areas. Anal sis The main issue is whether the dedication of 29 percent of the applicant's property is reasonable and fair. Staff acknowledges that a dedication of this magnitude i s9 reater than the applicant's "fair -share". Additionally, even though the easement area would be counted for density purposes, full compensation would not be realized, because the remainder of parcel three could not support the maximum allowable density. Resolution of this "fair -share" issue will require Council adoption of a policy for the acquisition of storm water easements. It is suggested that Council authorize staff to prepare a policy proposal and that such a policy be established, as soon as possible. If, at this time, Mrs. Lepsche wishes to proceed with the creation of parcels one and two (Map two) ' she should be required to quit claim her development rights to the City for a period of one year or until a policy is adopted, whichever comes first. Staff's concern is that if some form of leverage is not retained (quit claim of development ri rights or deny the lot division) that this ponding area, including the 9 _ applicant's "fair -share", may have to be purchased, if adjoining pr-Dperty were to develop before a dedication is agreed upon. Mrs. Le sche also asserts that, the City is unjustified fn requiring a storm water ponding easement as a condition of this lot spl.i t. on the contrary, where the Maplewood ewood Drai na a Plan shows the need for a drainage pond, as in the applicant's ap g case (Map three) , easement dedications are routinely required as a condition of lot divisions andp 1 ats , in accordance with Section 1006 (e).of the City Platting Code. Recommendation I. .Approval of a lot division to create three 1 ots at 840 North McKnight, as illustrated on Map Two, subject to : 1 Dedication og f a drainage- easement over, under, through and across the y . westerl 280 feet of Parcel Three. If the dedication of this easement is unsatisfactory, then a deed restriction shall be recorded to run with Par �"stating el Three that "The fee owner and any assigns thereof of this Parcel parcel hereby quit claim all their right absolutely and totally to develop- ment of this parcel for any purpose .whatsoever without prior approval of the Council of the City of Maplewood for a period of one year or until the City Cit Council adopts a storm water acquisition policy (SWAC) whichever comes first". 2. All deeds associated with this request must be recorded within six (6) months or approval will be null and void.. II. Authorize the Director of Public Works to develop a policy proposal for Council consideration that would establish a "fair. -share" dedication for storm water easements. 2 BACKGROUND Site Description Size: A double fronting, 3.6 acre parcel with 165 feet on McKnight Road and 198 feet on Stillwater Road, Existing land use: A single dwelling, fronting on McKnight Road.; Surrounding Land Uses - North Beaver Lake Church and undeveloped land. In September 1979, Council gave -prel imi nary approval to . Gaughan Corporation for a multiple dwelling PUD on the undeveloped land. East: Stillwater Road. Across Stillwater Road, single dwellings. South: Single dwellings West: McKnight Road. Across McKnight ' Road, single dwellings in the City of St. Paul Past Actions 1-4-82: In considering a request from the applicant, to vacate the road easement .north of her property, Staff was directed to "take into account the need for a ponding area on the applicant's property if and when a request for a lot division is made." 5-12-82: Staff approved a lot division request for the applicant, subject to: 1. Dedication of a drainage easement over, under., through and across the westerly 280 feet of Parcel Three, as illustrated on Map two. 2. Removal of the old appl i cances , cans, scrap metal, brush, etc. from behind the sheds located on proposed Parcel One. 3. All deeds associated with this request must be recorded within six (6) months or approval will be .null and void. DEPART!1ENT CONSIDERATIONS Planning 1. Land Use Plan designation: Proposed Parcels One and , Two --RL, Residential Lower Density. Proposed Parcel Three- -Residenti al Higher Density. 2. _Zoning: R-1, Residence District (Single dwelling) 3. Compliance .with Land Use Laws: Section 1006 (e) of City Code -states that "The City Council may require that a reasonable portion of any proposed sub- division ub- division be dedicated to the public or preserve for public use as . . storm water drainage and holding areas or ponds." The Mapl ev.bod Drainage Plan clearly shows the need for a seven acre-foot storm water storage area. (Map Three) 3 Public Works 1. A storm drainage easement for the future seven acre-foot pond should be dedicated b� the applicant for the area shown on Map Two. 2. The contours of the site make an easement of any less area inadequate. 3. Water is not available to proposed Parcel Three. - 4-. Sewer is available to all three proposed parcels. } d jc Enclosures: 1. Location Map 2. Drainage Easement Required, 3. Excerpt from the Maplewood Drainage Plan 4. Applicant'.s Appeal Request 4 i R bi s YARYLAKE Ito. 39 ' !VY AVE i' Trailer Court Q 6S (Private) E. MA RYLA N D F, ,�owsT /97e, A ST _ I20 31 •' o� AvE 69 _ q o '? c 6 t Be ever MA 1wtOLiA AVE. o d Lode J t : r o .CASE 69 �a F- : RVESTER AVL AVE_ > b Z = W Z1Z W E�- LA. BRAND AVE' 3 ST. TTM k Ati E. Zs* E. 7 TM AVE. J. T29N • u 23130 AVE. R22W 31 R21W W361 70> NAVA AVE. ��/ 34 34 E. MARGARET AVE :• r E STM AVE. - J • W J < FREMO NT AVE '.3M CONwAY �- �� - AVE R E 0. F -13M 68 �. IZo Map 1 LOCATION MAP' • r. 985 ..� " U4, p - X 9 7 7 -.1000 Ale 3CAr- / 3.0 ,44 F-1 1 : _ \ rcel 1 .. 1 a Pa cn00. - Parcel 2 . , -CoParce1 3, '280 280 r 992 cc .r O 00 �;t �., � -j �rCr � 1 f D EE-,4J'D Kj�i��?• Fi J E. t(f 00 2 A - •• 3 D ! q X 10. D, ,• v I Go •O 14? El -I -(L, 2 3 12-4 2 J t t MAP 2 PROPERTY LINE MAP /W■ Drainage area Required Drainage Easement - .•, ,� .. - - is p r. �4 ti r: :. CDro .•- l • • ``.J Z • . N r.3) I '• 1 ) ,. i % 000, MAJOR WATERSHED DIVIDE y INTERIOR WATERSHED DIVIDES • PROPOSED STORM SEWER 42" • ` EXISTING STORM SEWER --- r OPEN CHANNEL STORM WATER STORAGE AREA INUNDATION AREA ' STORAGE AREA VOLUMEqw a � �'• '-` _-" DISCHARGE IN CFS ` �— CITY .•. � LIMITS .................. .................. 0 400 800 1200 SCALE tN FEE - MAP 3 Excerpt from the Maplewood Drainage Plan H. jrLI �1 Li �i it 4 J - � �/� is r:., �� • / � '' ;/,0; ILI Ile ol If 11 • ._ _� j� ,f j s• i .f l I � �! J� �� t Jir' - 00( i ... �, �/ `^, ��' . �,..,•�.� f _ f `. ,� .s3• _ w ...i� •.r'r j - �'f _ vim` L� • ' If / oo IL 14 'ar oo wl lool At AO AIP f ! 1 • • +'• ` _�� � / � s: .•� f �I- .fes (� M-1• ,i'1,� j^��r�,.��iir....� !,I -'��, /.�j.. .. ,f; .�`,► � •,`- • • i i f � . r r , �-- �� L/L' • 1..—' .��..� Y � � L. it ^ •. Ar �.�-Vf —� .`. � ►•r' moi..^ �„"t/."�•'►r�[.� /.� � � -• i I • ``! _ter..•'• f � �•-� �l � % ter• r ^` V � �••' • •''7 ' � _.fes .•.�L / / .� l Ile Ole a f' 410 . '" �,/ , .., r y ;, .�� ..r �' ✓ ,fit _ �% �%J � � . - .. -- op //'�./ .i r I all I � ,s Ao . or ��• • ' - r �; 1 f .-. a 4•� l = ^\'•f^ ` %^_ • �r w �.r .• �` • J 100. ll� f_ • ,r � ' � � �..0 -,•/' _ "fes, "�•s� '� _ 1' / `"S.•�' w..^ � � �i �. �1 M" • �� , ,'_�" � •����,�. Lam,-'� �-' .� �-�•?�-�•-� �f4 .�•-� /. /� � `77 -70'_ ♦- ` �.w' AV. Ar •- .� 'o Wo. dr _ t 000 1 , i • lit �• f / •.r L •%•`r' f• 1 ` 'I'r ` 1 L f 41�` ^ +. �n��i a�� f r : l r I it JF AF ♦a• _. �l • ` f • • ^ M1 .. .f-` .r♦�. ! le 40 1 Of �. ...- i - OW r � j . •%tel •r •.� � �� - ".�•�!'� � �'' �_• �. ♦_ - y � �' f' - 1 • .10 L r r ` / `• 41 ol ` •fir �'l .� .� %,� ,s .�'....A. i�`�♦ -/ _1-� • :> 1 ,� ` op/ F f s ,''' J ,t ,,C.,00p j • �1 1 ' V Jd r f i ` • � � � .../_ i i �. f �. ! ,ice. .! O �� �"'� ,,' �^ �-tel' f� !�'.�..�t�' � f�t�. t ' r j r � _.� J-- V �' .. � ,-•.,. �i.,✓ J _ "' , j ' — �... �.,.*` _ f i� ""' � l ~j . _.fit.__....- • i 1� r / w .s. s , • dow 01, �- r • ' .% f r • f . / • i � `.. •/rte . / ♦ s ` Oltf _ - , ,0_ i I �u /1 1110 -'- .► .r __ �- ! -.. � � � y . - -' .+r•-� �... � ��. cam". - - " ,.. � f - r• _ MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager _ FROM: Associate Planner --Johnson SUBJECT HRA/City Council Joint Meeting and Annual Report DATE: June 8, 1982 - =Request .The Housing and Redevelopment Authority requests that the City Council schedule a joint meeting for June 17th. June 24th is suggested as an alternate date. Background Normally a joint meeting of the Council and HRA is held in April of each year to discuss the HRA.' s accomplishments and proposed objectives. This year's meeting has been delayed to enable the two new commissioners (Gregory Schmi t and Ronald Smith) to participate in the setting of objectives for the upcoming year. A copy of the HRA's 1981-1982'Annual Report is enclosed for your acceptance. The cover letter from Chairman Fischer lists the objectives which the HRA wishes to pursue in the upcoming year. Time is of the essence if objectives one and two (tandem seniors and first-time home buyers program) are to be accomplished. For this reason, a joint meeting should be held no later than June 30th. Recommendation I. Accept the HRA's 1,981-1982 Annual Report. II. Set June 17th as the date for a joint meeting of the Council and HRA. June 24th is suggested as an alternate date. 'w Enclosure HRA Annual Report MAPLEWOOD HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 1981 - 1982 ANNUAL REPORT Ar CITY OF [ s: M1� 1 LEWO 0110 1902 EAST COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109 - OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - 7704560 April 21, 1982 Maplewood City Council 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 ANNUAL REPORT The Maplewood Housing and Redevelopment Authority's Annual Report, for the period March 1981 through February 1982, is attached. A copy of the attendance record for this period is enclosed as Exhibit A. As you are aware, resignations were received from Commission members Fran Juker and Thomas Morris,, and interviews were conducted for their replacements, Program Pa_ rti ci pati on During the past year we have participated in three programs administered by the Metropolitan Council Housing and Redevelopment Authority: Section 8 Rental Assistance -Existing Housing (Exhibit B) , Section 8 -Moderate Rehab- ilitation, and the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Home Improvement Grant and Loan Programs (Exhibits C -E) . Our current year Section 8 Existing Housing participation is at 141 units, up from 111 i n 1979. In 1979, the criteria for priority ranking were changed to reflect concerns for the working poor. Housing Projects Two housing projects were completed in Maplewood during this reporting period. Construction of the Maple Knoll Planned Unit Development, Radatz and White Bear Avenues, (57 townhouse units) was completed and occupied -in September. Concordia Arms, 2030 Lydia Avenue, (124 units for the _elderly) started renting in October. This building, owned by -7.;* on Luth- -_eran Church, was built with Section 202 funds and is being ma- abed by Wilder Corporation. The Ataxia Foundation considered locating ten units of subsidized housing for the handicapped in Maplewood. The fi to (east of the Maplewood State Bank) was dropped from consideration because it could not accommodate the proposed site plan. Unlike previous years, we have not been involved in the review of any subsidized housing proposal s-- CDBG or Bonus funds. Maplewood City Council U Page 2 April 219 1982 Code Amendment Proposals Three zoning code amendments were recommended to the City Council this past year. These recommendations were:' 1) to reduce the minimum floor area requirements for detached single dwellings, 2) redefine family to establish a maximum number of unrelated individuals who may live together, and 3) establish accessory apartments (mother-in-law.apartments) as special exception uses in single -dwelling neighborhoods. In consideration of the minimum floor area proposal, three tours of existing housing were conducted. Members of the Planning Commission and City Council accompanied the HRA membership. Once both of our recommend- ations (use of the Building Code or 800 square feet) had been defeated, we recommended the staff and Planning Commission proposals. These pro- posal s roposals were also defeated by Council with one exception --the one-story dwelling floor area minimum was reduced from 1040 to 950 square feet. The redefinition of family and accessory apartment proposals were defeated. Housing Goals The Metropolitan Council has established housing goals for each community based on the estimated number of units supportable by the remaining alloca- tion l1oca- tion from 1980-83 housing -related funds for the Metropolitan area. Maple - wood's housing production goals until October 1983 are 29 small family (two bedroom) , 2 large family (three bedroom), and 17 elderly units. These goals apply to a combination of new construction and participation in exi st- ng rent subsidy programs. The Metropolitan Council, through its A-95 review process, discourages housing production in excess of these goals. where Federal of State monies are involved. 1982-1983 Program The housing market continues to be depressed. High mortgage inter 9est rates make it nearly impossible for the first-time home buyer to enter the e m arket. Vacancy rates are low for existing rental units. New construction of market a ket rate rental units appears to be cost -prohibitive. Federal funding for the CommunityDevelopment Block g p ck Grant Program to assist the development of additional low to moderate income subsidized housing has been red • the F 8 -- New reduced* Federal Section 8 New Construction (rental) program has been eliminated. 9 Although supporting data is not yet available from the 1980ens c us, the HRA membership feels that these market forces are causing �Ha 1 ewood' the most concern among P s first-time home buyer and elderly populations. Rehabilitation and continued maintenance of existing housing is also a concern of he memb ershi p. Objectives for the upcoming year are as follows: 1. Determine whether it would be feasible for Maplewood ewood to !acilitatepthe development of a senior citizen residence -rental, condominium or cooperative. K Maplewood City Council j Page 3 April 21. , 1982 2. If a seniors' residence is constructed, a tandem rogram should be 40P looked into, to assist low to moderate income first-time home buyers y with the purchase of the homes made available b relocati senior �9 - citizens. :30 Continue to participate in the following Metro HRA administered • programs. a. Section 8 Rental Assistance - Existing Construction b. Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation of Rental Dwellings c. MHFA Home Improvement Loan Program for low income home owners 4. Develop a plan for assembling substandard tax -forfeited lots to sell to adjoining property owners. The objectives would be to eliminate the opportunity for construction on these parcels , resolve any maintenance problems that may exist, and bring the parcels back onto the tax rolls. 5. Seek Council approval of the following zoning code revisions to reduce the costs of housing and create more housing opportunities : a. Reduction in the minimum floor area requirements for all forms of residential construction. b. Allow accessory apartments by special permit in single -dwelling neighborhoods. c. Allow single dwelling development on bots less than 75 feet wide under specified circumstances, such as., infill development or under a PUD with zero lot line construction. 6. Submit articles to the Maplewood in Motion on a regular basis to advertise the availability of various housi n9 P 9 -related ro rams. 7. Survey the present condition of homes that were rehabilitated under the home improvement grant program. The objective would be to determine if this program -was effective in creating an incentive to continue to maintain these properties. 8. Monitor any subsidized housing proposals for consistency with Maplewood's Housing Plan, 9. Holdsjoint meeting with the City Council in April to review our year' s performance and to outline a work program for the coming year. As in the past, we will attempt to keep current on what is happening in the field of housing, and actively pursue ways to facilitate affordable housing '0 n our City, in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. ... If at any time it is felt that additional input or guidance frog the Council is desirable for the proper functioning of the HRA, a request ftr a shirt- sleeve session or a presentation under the "visitor Presentation" item on your .agenAa will be requested. '�:' Q Lorraine ffs':'�c�h"e;r#, that rman Maplewood HRA mb EXHIBIT A HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEMBER r-- TERM EXPIRES Lorraine Fischer March 1986 1812 North Furness X X Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 X X X XX Guy Glover March 1984 809 E. Belmont Lane X X Maplewood, Minnesota 55117 X X Frances Juker J March 1983 1965 Barclay Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 X X XXX Tom Morris J W March 1982 2324 Gall Avenue X O Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 •� •�-- to Lucille Bryant ,� U March 1985 1556 Gervais Avenue U x Mapl ewood, Minnesota 55109 �-- 00 r— O0 r- �--- CO Bryant r-- X X X X X XX X X Fischer X X X X XX X XX X X Glover X X X J •O J JLLJ X Juker X X X XXX 4 J W d O _.J � z J W x X X O •� •�-- to !— �„_ ,� U Q U V 1--- U x Co00 •r C: r-- Co �-- 00 r— O0 r- �--- CO !"_ Co CO Co 00 XX X • r U 01 4J C 1 On 1 Oo I cc 00 'd' 1 N 1 1 ICO r— 1 1 1 In Co CI CO 00 I N 00 r. a3 = r— i r-- W) r-- N Q1 r— r �-- I r-- N CO N 1 I O O M U 1 M 1 1 f 1 I U-) 1„n toLO 1 1 � Ol 1 r-1 r-- 1 r 1 Q1 1 minimum floor area requirements, r r... MOW r N Bryant X X X X X XX X X Fischer X X X X XX X XX X X Glover X X X J J J JLLJ X Juker X X X XXX x J W J W z _.J � z J W x X X J W Z ,� U Q U V Q V U x Morri s X X X X X X X XX X --4 X *Tours were of dwellings of various styles and floor areas i ncon unction with developing a proposal for reducing minimum floor area requirements, 0 EXHIBIT ,B Section 8 Rental Units - Maplewood Gordon and Joyce Berres 1894 Manton Paul Bowman 1902 Adolphus Christensen's Properties 2112, 2080, 2104 Mississippi Lester Deets 1055 Bellecrest Drive Eastwood Investment 2605, 2585, 2613 Conway Edgerton Highland 482 E. Skillman Brookview Manor 131 Century Hazelwood -Gear Apartments 1520 E. County Road B Louis Gilbert 1860 McMenemy John Grabowski 2072 Mississippi Greengate Apartments 1829 Furness English Manor 1809 English John Kelly 15-30 McKnight Road MAM Properties 1247 Century 1 Total 1 - 2 BR 1 Total - BR 4 Total BR 1 Total ffR 4 Total BR 12 Total 11 - 2 BR 1 - 1 BR 4 Total 4 - 2 BR 15 Total =-SBR -1-�- 1 BR 1 Total -SSR 1 Total ER 2 Total BR 7 Total BR 1 - 1 BR 1 Total T4 FR - 21 Total 7 - BR 4 1 BR Grant Cycle Endi n July 1977 July 1978 July 1979 July 1980 July 1981 EXHIBIT C MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY HOME IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM (Maplewood) 4 grants - $5,752.00 Average - $1438.00 per applicant 11 grants - $26,261.00 Average - $2,387.00 per applicant 7 grants - $199320,000 Average - $2,760.00 per applicant 13 grants - $36,838.00 Average - $2,834.00 per applicant 10 grants - $389964,00 Average - $3,896-OO.per applicant EXHIBIT n HOME IMPROVEMENT LOANS AVAILABLE .The Maplewood Housing and Redevelopment Authority is accepting applications for the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency's Home Improvement Loan Program. Households with 'an annual adjusted gross income of $6,000 or less are eligible for assistance. The program offers 3% interest and deferred payment loans. A loan may be totally or partially deferred, dependent upon an applicant's i ability cant's income and PP 1 � ty to Pay. The purpose of this loan program is to assist eligible applicants in �Pai ri n9 their homes to - correct deficiencies directly affecting safety, habitability, �ener9y usagee and handicap accessibility. The maximum grant amount ava-i 1 abl e is $6--,000perPP a 1icant. Homeowners and contractors wishingto participate p p to i n this program should contact Randall Johnson (770-4560) at the Maplewood Office of Community Development, 0 w EXHIBIT E HOME IMPROVEMENT GRANTS* YEAR FUNDING JULY 19.80. JUNE 81Ilk AZ 4; C3 tion o� Q- o o DATE OF REPORT`�, Q w ti OTHER COMMENTS �• . January 192 • 80-1. 7/9 OK 9/10 9/16 A 6000.00 OWNx RAP 80-2 7/10 NO 80-3 7/14 OK 1/20 A 5701.49 X X . RAP 80-4 7/14 OK 9/10 9/16 A 2569.10 ' ' X RAP �-5 7/14 RAP OK 10/3 10/ 14 A 4796.25 X . 1 , 90-6 7/14 OK • WITHDREW 80-7 7/23 OK 9/2310/14 2101.75 X RAP 80.8 7/23 NO 80-9 7/26 OK 10/3 10/14 A 2000 . • WITHDREW 80-10 8/1 OK .10/8 10/14 A 2333.00 x RAP 80-11 8/2 OK 10/3 10/14 A 4144.88 x RAP W12 7/6 NO 80-13 8/25 OK 10/310/14 A 1935.00 x RAP M!N i 80-14 8/1 OK 10/3 10 . /14 A 5370.00 X RAP 80-15 WS OK 10/1 10/1 A 4012.00 X RAP Now seem 90-16 9/3 NO , 8b-11 I�' 10/ NO NOTE: RAP • we�theritotion b . y Ramsey Action Program TOTAL GRANT AMOUNT Year V Allocation S25,184 89964.07 Bonus funds received $13,780.07 • The Minnesota Data Privacy Act Prohibits identification of Grant gepliGants.