The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1982 04-01 City Council Packet77 1 AGENDA Ma1ewod oni 1y 00PM Thu A r1 1 1982y , , nmu c al Administration gui l di np q M: 2 -Mee 8Q CALL rTOROER CA ct )APPROIfAL 0 14-1 NUTES APPROVAL OF-AGENDA Et}0 S -C KENT :AGENDA 11 e nmattrs1stedu der the Consent A :enda :are considered to be :rout ne bA . t e C1 d bCouncilandwi11beenactey one motionn t e orm Este _ e ow There wl 11 be no se aga da -scuss on on these tems,. If d scuss. sired that em wi 11 be remo ed rom the C 'sent A enda and w111 betvfo_ p nsco dered :separatel 1. Acco nts Pa ableu 2. Di s gal of O1 d Fi nand a1 Records 3. : Remove n Count State A d H hwa Des i gnat onQ . y g' y C USLIC HEARINGS , z a - :S tree 7.001. R tre t Ceonn. 2010 Clarence 2 Board. f Ad stmen s and A eals:a _ o Ju._ , t pP a. -Minute. b. Uar -lance.. 2010 - Clarence Street 7 .00 3. • A 1 s read n 7 :15CodeAmendment. accessory pt t q .) 4. Code Amendment. RE district . side and setbacks st reading 7:30y di 7 :45 '5. -Code Amendment: Deft n ti on of Farm y 1st rea din - - G AWARD OF BIDS H)UNFINLSH :ED :BUSINESS None L IS LT , P AT I NVOR - REsENT C . J I' S .U NE SNEWBS _ P1 .: M aple Park Sho -1. F ina l at Memory al Da2. sarrack: Off -sale y Feasbi ft Stu -,3. TH 61 - Fronta a Road y y0 r Ke11er C u seL quo ce nse. Given K) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 2. 3. 4. 5* 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. L) ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS M) ADJOURNMENT A C C O UN T S P A Y A 8 L E DATE 04 —p 1..8 2 PAGEFf0UNTCLAIMANTPURP0SE 3 , 9 9 3 9.4 0 MINN STATE TREASURER DEPOSITS mDEP UTY REG MINN STATE TREASURER --- -_ - - -- - __STATE D/L FEES PAYABLE2l1 -- -- -_ , 4 4. 50 .- _M-I -N N -- W-A T.E - T R E..AS Ufa F.R - SIT-S-!m!-DEPlJTY0002121,E50050 ST MINNINN STATE TREASURER DEPOSITS ..L3EP UTY AEG I0002131690D . _._ _- -- - --__ _ ___ _ S T ZZ-0214-- • MILAN STATE TREASURERSURER STATE D --1. FEES PAYABLE RL - -KD — JUDEMEN S000215i00.00 BARRY EVANS VEHICLE ALLOWANCE GOVT TRAINING SERVICE TFAVEL + TRAININGD021T -- _ - -6 !. _._._.pQ S-T M.A S T ER. _ ._.____ --- P-0-ST" E 000218 55.0 0 UNIVERSITY -- - - - - -- - -- - -.__OF MINNESOTA T t T _ ____ ' E 00021. '. 9 3 3 3.0 D ! N --- ~ - -- __ , O _ . _ . __I N STATE TREASURER - - -- - - -- _---STATE -- D/L - FEES PAYABLE N - S_T A T F--J R E.A. SU-R ER I TS -D.E P..0 T Y. -R E.G I S T-o0fl0221, 1,217.55 M N STATE TREASURER -PERA 0002 . _ - ---_ CONTRIBUTIONS, PERA. 47 MN STATE TREASURER _ PE - -_ __ - - --RA P. E.P.A. UE0 PAYABLE AND0002238 . 9 7 2 7 g _ - CONTRISUTIONS PE R A ; MN STATE TREASURER-P*E.P..A. DEO PAYABLE ANG'CONTRI0002247450 ____ PERA RA MSEY L CC - _ --CLERK OF ©IST --CNTY D/L FEES PAYABLE MI S TA T.E_ T- R-EASURER -- _____._ 0/-L _ _REFS . -- P.A Y.1 SL E -000227 b203.25 M - . _ .INN STATE TREASURER DEPOSITSTS- DEPUTY REGIST0002.2$ 19959.00 M _.INN STATE TREASURER _ -DEPOSITS- DEPUTY REG IST. TA TZ `- AL - -A Y.A BL.E-000230 8T B 0 MINK STATE TREASURER D N R LICE N SF FEES P8L000231116000M --INN STATE TREASURER -- 2.0 , T 5 DNR LICENSE FEES P8L0D22 -- --- -- -- E T IAA -S T F -- --OV TR -0.„ -4 M A VAS LE- 4 4.0 2 3 3 350.00 r CITY OF MAPLEw000 A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 04-01-82 PAGE CHEC A M O U N T C L A _I M A N T p U p O S E 000234 19652.47 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURNCE 000235 2,768.96 GREAT WEST LIFE ---ASSURNC - --E CONTFIBUT ION S, INSURANCE A/R = INS CONTINUANCE AND - HEALTH INS PAYABLE AND --Llf_E . INS..-ZED -.PA YA31 AND —CONT R IBU T I ONS, I NSU9 000236 .__.__ _ _17.11 _ __..MINN STATE _7REAS4 . ___.___ .____._S_llRCHQR.G£ IAX PAYABLE S.UPPI..IES , _.OFFICE AND , mTRAYEL + TRAINING STATE_II./__L-- f -EES -- -PAYA 8LE 000239 19495.50 MINK STATE TREASURER 000240 319.1 ICNA RETIREMENT CORP 000241 239089.43 MaPi,EM000 STATE BANK DEPOSITS DEPUTY REGIST• DEFERRED COMP PAYABLE ANC- DEFERRED COMPENSATI FED INCOME TAX PAYABLE 1 B00*3-8--- JmDY.__cHLEBECK COD 2 3 8 _198,e 0.0 --MIN N STATE- . T R E A SIJR ER - -- - - - - - -- -- S.UPPI..IES , _.OFFICE AND , mTRAYEL + TRAINING STATE_II./__L-- f -EES -- -PAYA 8LE 000239 19495.50 MINK STATE TREASURER 000240 319.1 ICNA RETIREMENT CORP 000241 239089.43 MaPi,EM000 STATE BANK DEPOSITS DEPUTY REGIST• DEFERRED COMP PAYABLE ANC- DEFERRED COMPENSATI FED INCOME TAX PAYABLE 1 B00*3-8---S T A TF _ E _ ! __--- - - _L N ti__.I N ME— lAl__P_AY BLA- f 000243 11,346.00 CITY # - CTY CREDIT UNION CREDIT UNION DEC PA YA81 000244 2 0 0.0 0 MN STATE RETIREMENT Y ' - _ _ _S ST DEFERRED COMP PAYABLE 0-00,2 - -2 4 4b114- -- _._....._-MET -Ra _..S.URZ IrSD ASS-O -C — -- . -- - --- U 000246 297.43 AFSCME LOCAL 2725 UNION DUES PAYABLE e N p -F A -,T2 --SHAD E FEFS ---P -A ` 000 574.68 MN TEAMSTERS LOCAL 320 UNION DUES PAYABLE AND -r - IR - - SHQRF, . - FEES - . - PA 000248 145.0 0 ROSEMARY KANE WAGE DEDUCTIONS PAYA 8L f 000249 187050 MAPLEWOOD STATE BANK WAGE DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 2 2 0 0 K N - - U T1! AL - _L I_F E US F D --_CIS P _. _PA YA 8 L E 000251 730.86 CONN GENERAL LIFE INS CO CONTRIBUTIONS INSURANCE 000252 461.93 CONN GENERAL LIFE INS CO CONTRI U _8 TIONS, INSVR ANCf 400253. - - -- - -4 0 4D 0. -P.AU LINE - H.AL- YERS.ON— . - -.- -. 000254 1, =52.25 MINN STATE TREASURER DEPOSITS- DEPUTY REGIST. OF RAPLEWOOD CHECK* A M C U N T 000255 410.00 000256 - -- --- __150.00 IID 000258 i, 36-1.00 000259 -- - - - - -. - - -_ — ..94.5 0 000261 221000221.00 9486* 00 0 0 0 2 000264 1, 35 0.0 0 227.00 D.D. 2f--- - - - - -- __ -- 5 999176.69 A C C O U N T S P A Y A 8 L E DATE 04 -01_82 PAGECLAIMANT P U R P 0 S E MINN STATE TREASURER STATE 0 / L FEES P A rA eLICHURCHOFTHESACPEp --- ,_r____ --------- RENTAL, EQUIPMEN — - q I-N y . S T A T E --.-U MINN STATE TREASURER ELE DEPOSITS -CEP UTY REG --- RAMSEY CC CLERK OF D IST CN TY O/L FiES PAYATXINCITIES_..ARNA :..CND -?E MINN STATE TREASURER STATE D/L FEE PAY AM ALE N STATE TREASURER flEPOSITS_pEPUTY REG IST BUR 8 A N _ -C N.A N- B.EC..M EX E __ CONSOLIDATED TO I1G FEES, SERVICE MINN STATE TREASURER 3 --STATE D /L PEES P -AYA 0LE N-I. --S TAT.E.- -T.R.E.AS.UR ER j n c iry c. - IIEP_..1! TX--JMG IS-T.4 NECESSARY EXPENDITURES SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF MAPLEWCOC ACCOUNTS PAYA 8L E DATE 0,4--0 1--82 PAGE CHECK*A M C U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S E 012810 59e93 ACRO-mMINNESOTA INC SUPPLIES q OFFICE 0128 ii 87o0 6 A-JAX POWER BRAKE INC SUPPLIES VEHICLE CONTRIBUTIONS 9 INSUR 012829 212*50 RlP.j_1_0J4S+-MEM8ERSHl 012613 707081 AFNALS AUTO SERVICE REP* + MAINTel VEHICLEc., 012814 122.49 BADGE A MINT SUPPLIES9 PROGPA" CONTRIBUTION s, rNSUR ANCf S -Vj C E . _ _ - . AND- TRAVEL + TRAINING 012831 53*59 eatin nspector 012816 119773961 BOARD OF WATER COMM OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSI R -_+- -MA-INT -EQUI P-ME t 012833 86*97 Service---connect ion - ___._. 012817 317030 BOARD OF WATER COMM OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEE I-L 'G_-I_MPR0VEP_.ENT_-_____, 012819 30050 CALCULATORS INC SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT 012820 86*45 CALLAHAN STEEL SUPPLY MAINTENANCE MATERIALS Um .I:1i S S ---- - - _ _ _____ .A.VEL__+_ _T RAI N,l 012822 9*20 CHI PPE WA SPRINGS CO 012823 12*50 DENNIS S CUSICK II.i2H24. - -.- ----- 51- .47.__.. BATA _ DOCL!liEitS WFEE S ERYICE a t er'o o o.L e r C I N S UR A NC E UPPL IfS_*_0_F_F. I C E 012825 12.CENNIS J DELMONT CONTRIBUTIONS, INSURANCE 012 19473*40 EASTMAN KODAK CO DUPLICATING COSTS iZ$27 ---- -34*75-V. _w. -EIMILYCE -ASSO-C --INC 012828 12e50 JAMES EMBERTSON CONTRIBUTIONS 9 INSUR 012829 212*50 BARRY EVANS CON I N S UR A NC F AND- VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 012830 25*00 DANIEL F FAUST CONTRIBUTION s, rNSUR ANCf AND- TRAVEL + TRAINING 012831 53*59 GENERAL MOTORS CORP SUPPLIES, VEHICLE 0128Z2-990 03-__GENERAL -REPAIR -R -_+- -MA-INT -EQUI P-ME t 012833 86*97 GENERAL TRADING SMALL TOOLS CITY OF MAPLEWOOC A C C O U N T S P A Y A BL E DATE 0-Ol 82 PAGE CHE C A M 0 U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E 012834 23.04 GLADSTONE LUMBER DART REP* M A I NT . BL 0 G +GP t 012835 153.76 6000rEAR SERVICE -STORE SUPPLIES, yEHICLE AND --PEP. + MA NT. • 012836 12.50 MELVIN J GUSINDA CONTRI BUTTON S, INSUR ANCf 5-0 AR L I-N E-- J .--- .A G Ek - ___ -- _ir : -8i 3' IO.N S .ANC I 012838 12.50 THOMAS L HAGEN CONTRIBUTIOHS,INSURANCI 012 8 3 9 177013 .H ARMON GLASS REP. + 14 AINt , ._ VEM __I CL ._.. E. E.CT_RO-NIC S_- - - -- 012841 7.03 HOMELITE DIV OF XTE TROH SUPPLIES, VEHICLE 0 15.0 0 HOWIES LOC +KEY - SERVIC FE S, E VICELocsepaced 0 84 3 20 • T 0 ---UT1 - 11S - llS _C.Q P ___.....,P - LIES - .Of - n CE 012844::51.75 J + J TROPHY$ f SPORTS SUPP LIES, PROGRAP 012845 45.00 JOHNSON - t3000S MENSWEAR UNIFORMS CLOTHING 46 - ---SZb. 0 8 .. _._K..- I- I. --C -- — - -_-- - ----a s 0 al Di2847 32.50 RICHARC J LANG SUPPLIES: PROGRAM 012848 460.00 LESLIE PAPER .DUPLICATING COSTS 0 i 2-$4 9 - --i2 -..5 -D --. __--1zV 1Ak--_LE.W ,I.S_ -- _...RTAIJTIONS A N r. f 012850 120.00 STEVEN J LUKIN S-F S R VEMT fucor 012851 4.39 MANDO PHOTO -—SERVICE11HIMSProcessing D l2$S2 --i- 1..75 --iAP LEN .rl. _ _FEE - SE R.V IC-E -. - 012853 6 .0.00 MAPLEWOOQ QAKOALE PRINT After School Events PUBLISHING 012854 29795.20 METRO PINS ECTION SERVICE FEES, SERVICE Electrical Inspector U-EAT --E 012855 32950 DANIEL METTLER ppSUPPLIES * . PROGRAM 012857 144.0 0 MILTON CLOTHING CO UNIFORMS C P.- JRTNE- PUBLIC _EQUIP - *.EN T CITE/ OF MAPLEWOOD A C C 0 U N T S P A P A 8 L E OATE 04 -01 -82 PAGE 6 CHEC A H C U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S E 012659 174.76 MN MINING + MFG CO SUPPLIES , OFFICE 012860 422.69 STATE OF MN REP. + MAINT . , UTILITY 0 -. 02- WIN-FIELD - -A --MITJCHE AL.._. -*-- .F -ISC AL - -- 012862 219055000 MOLINE PRINTING PUBLISHING 012863 46.0 0 MONROE CALCULATOR CO REP. + MAINT ., EQUIPMEN W 3.1, L2- _ _ T-0 N. _.P1J1B11SNING 012865 893.10 MOTOROLA INC REP. + MAINT., RACIO 012866 444075 MUNIC + PRIVATE SERVICE AND-FEES, SERVICE -Feb. Anima 1 ntro 1 012867 18.20 NATIONAL BUSINESS SYSTEM FEES, SERVICE Microfiche Processing HA_T I0 -N AL.- JaJLDL.I.EF D.-- - —SUB SKIP—T-10 N S # ME.M..BERSH 1 012869 1,340.87 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO UTILITIES 012870 1, 2 32.65 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO UTILITIES 11.12 -8 7 - -- - -g-8 4 .1. 4 - - _.N OR T HM E -STERN _ L. I. _ F_!._._ -0--- _ i ONE - --- -- O i 2872 E80,079 NORTHWESTERN BELL TEL CO TELEPHONE 012873 288.41 NORTHWESTERN BELL TEL CO TELEPHONE D 12 8 7 - - -__ -_--- _5,21 .9.0__- _X0R T_"E .ERN BFLL-.-TEL--C -- C 12 875 12.50 ROBERT OCEGARO CONTRIBUTION S INSURANCE 012876 4.96 DENNIS PECK TRAVEL + TRAINING D -12 8 7 7 - _ ___. ,__120 5 0 -. _ -._ -- -_DAV ID_ J -- P.ILLATZKE- C.OMT R1 BUTI .IN SLUR ANCI 012878 119350000 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 012679 22.45 JOSEPH PRETTNER CONTRIBUTIONS,INSURANCf AND- TRAVEL TRAINING 012880 7 *00 RAMSEY COUNTY TREASURER MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 012A 8 i--- _ -- _ - . _ i b • 9 3 -. -. -- -.RA M SEY._ C CLIN T-l_ --T-.R.£A SLUR E R _..Hl1:SI; .0N T RAC T U AL _S E R VII 012882 357.73 RAMSEY COUNTY TREASURER FEES, SERVICE Data Processing 11 CIT OF MAPLEWOOD A C C O U N T S P A Y A 8L E DATE 04 01 - 82 PAGE CHECK*A M 0 U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 012883 1,000.00 RAMSEY CCUNTY TREASURER MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 012 884 314.37 ROAD RESCUE IN SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT ANDmREP, f MAINT. g VEH: 01.2885 28.50 ROSEVILLE AREA SCHOOL -L DISC CONTRACTUAL, SERVIt 1'- -8 -3-5.5 5 5 - _#--- T-- .n.P- E- --pa- - C 128 87 23.49 A C SCHAET CONTRIBUTIONS,INSURANCE 012888 12.50 RICHARD W SCHALLER C 0 N T R 18 U T I ON S , INSURANCE 012889 8 0 7.7 5 CITY fl F ST PAUL -. .~ _ _.AUL REP. f MAINT., RADIO 012 8 9 0 2 i. -64. -ST - --P-" L 8SCR IP T10 S +n1tBE R.SH 1 012891 402.90 STAT- -MEDICAL INC EQUIPMENT, OTHER 012892 175.30 STD SPRING + ALIGNMENT REP. MAINT., VEHICLEc. 012 8 9 3 -2 A . 5 8 lOH..S41.NS ANC.E AND- TRAVEL, f TRAINING 01-2894 13 - - N •-4 012895 28.30 TRUCK UTILITIES + MFG CO SUPPLIES, VEHICLE 012 896 37050 TWIN CITY .FILTER SERV IN S, S VICEfterearring 012897 106.35 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO MA INTENANCE MATERIALS AND- SMALL, TOOLS 032898 873035 VALS BODY SHOP REP. MAINT. • VEHICLES 0 i 2 s 9 9 - - --3 4 • b 5 -l R tER - S --- a- VA#.#,E --.0 .E P ES_q, --JA N I TOR IAtw -.--_ AND -MLA INTENA NCE MATERIA A 12900 -- - -5 a B-II WAS H RG T-M M TEAR TRAVFI- TRAINING- 042901 236 * 46 XEROX CORPORATION DUPLICATING COSTS 012902 54.00 RAEANN HC ERYL ANDERSEN WAGES, P/T f TEMP. 012904 14.0 0 GREGORY BOTHWELL WAGES, P/T f TEMP. INDICATED ITEMS FINANCED BY RECREATIONAL FEES, CITY OF MAPLEWOOD A C C 0 U N. T S P A Y A 8 L E DATE 04-&D 1 ,,82 PAGE 8 0. CHECK*A M 0 U N T C L A I M A N T P U P P 0 S E 012905 19le0 0 LARRY BOTHWELL WAGES, P,/T TEMP, 012906 20000 THOMAS J BRENNAN WAGES, P/T TEMP* 0 12 9-07- A 92408--hANCY. .-AN.N--JOHSON TEMPs 012908 16000 MICHAEL KUEHN WAGES, P/T TEMP,, oi2909 53e50 KRISTINE KULZER WAGES, P/T TEMP* D12910 13,o DD T-HEODDRE—M .1900-D-MAN WAGE.S 9_._PYT_TEMP. 012911 20000 JAMES MAGILL WAGES, P/T TEMP. 23*10 JULIE MCCOLLUM WAGES, P/T TEMPe 19*00 R0DZER__NE-LS0N WAG-ES-9 . PIT TEMP-o 012914 31*00 DEAN R NYBAKKE WAGES. P/T TEMP* 012915 452*69 DEBRA OaNEIL SUPPLIES, PROGRAM ANDwWAGES,P/T + TEMP 012916 51000 MICHAEL JOSEPH PELTIER WAGES .9 P/T TEMP +- 012917 422 ..5 0 DEN ISE_ -R YDE N G ..-P./T -+._TEMPO.- 012918 53*43 JULIE SULLIVAN WAGES, P/T TEMPO 012919 36o00 TAMMY SVENOSEN WAGES, P/T TEMP. CHA EL___J .-10 ENS UG G ES -9 —P--/-T TE-M-P 012921 10*00 JAMES TUCCITTO WAGES, P/T TEMP* 012922*23*10 RICHARD ALLEN WARZEKA WAGES9 P/T TEMPo 012923 * _ZA048 14ATTHEW _ZERBY__P/T TEIO.P-a 012924*45*00 JOYCE JUT R E F U N D 012925*50.00 RICHARD UGAI R E F U N 0 812926_143*24 KRS--E LEA k0R.__XL AEN HAMMER 117 1469141.*90 CHECKS WRITTEN TOTAL OF 174 CHECKS TOTAL 245, 318.59 INDICATED ITEMS FINANCED BY RECREATIONAL FEES, m TY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL REPORT PAGE i CERTIFICATION REGISTER CHECK DATE 03 -26 -82 CHECK NAME GROSS PAY NET PAX 03371 ANDERSON _.NORMAN -`_._G .2 'S.On __..i&1:8 - 3 i' 03372 BASTIAN GARY W 275.00 256.57 03373 GREAVU JOHN C 350.00 251.83 03374 JUKER - - --FIANCES _. -275: -ID 227.82 03375 MAIDA MAC YLEE T 275.00 237.29 033 76 E V°A N S BARRY R It 817.54 1 0 66.6 0 03377 LEWIS - - .___VIVA N _....__733: - 39 465.81 03378 PELOQUIN ALFRED 1 747.23 173083 03379 SCHLEICHER JOHN F 157.25 157.25 0338 0 CURE LAPP Y -.__ ----191:54 --144.78 03381 DOHERTY KATHLEEN M 305000 214008 D3382 ZUER CHER JOHN L 115.39 115.21 03383 FAUST 03,384 FRANK PATRICIA L 58.50 58.50 03385 HAGEN pwARLINt J 888.92 398913 03386 MATHEYS A ANA _ -- __ -__640 :$7 _467 : -- -- 03387 VIGOREN DELORES A 586.62 371.97 03386 AURE'LIUS LUCI LLE E 1, 334.31 680.50 033E9 SELVOG __.._81ETTV. - - - -.-Iii :23 - -444. 03390 GREEN PHYLLIS C 738.92 504.28 033 "91 SCHADT JEANNE L 215936 176.04 03392 VIETOi2 1.ORAAINE ---5 - --661.69 03393 HENSLEY PATRICIA A 240.98 181.02 03394 SASTYR DEBORAH A 532.16 253.77 03395 HAGEN THOMAS -- -__..i- 39T•54 -Zgi5 - - -- - -- - - - . - - -- - - r TY. OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL REPORT PAGE 2 CERTIFICATION - REGISTER CHECK DATE 03 -26 -82 CHECK NAME GROSS PAY NET PAY 0-3-396 C M A T H ...__. _O Y .- -- -___ -- - _5 4 9.93 -3 6 3 .- 32 033.97 RICHIE CAROL L 488.31 295.56 03398 SCHALLER RICHARD W 1, 513.39 909.76 01399 iEN13SEt ..._...____JOANNE - --1 - - r " - - -- - 67T.54 428.42 03400 ARNOLD DAVID L 19171039 404.73 03401 ATCHISON JOHN H i, 036.15 689.39 03402 _CAHA NES_. -_rA'NQNY G 1', 4:36 - . _113* 949 034 CLAUSON DA K 1, 036.15 155.75 03404 COLLINS KENNETH V 1, 190.23 233.49 034-05- - -DELMO.NT __1332..0D 113.05 - 103406 DREGER RICHARD C is 200 .46 669.10 03407 FERNOW RAYMOND E 498.77 57.15 0 3 4 0 G - R - n N - - _ __..._.i R N _` _ _. _._i ; 2f 3 I, ....._ ._ --665.54 03409 r HALWEG KEVIN R 1, Oi6.77 522.11 03410 HEINZ STEP HENE J TT 4.46 ,494.51 Q 3 4 i i I : - - - -- -0_16 6 2 5: 7 6 -- . - -- -- - - -- -- - - .- -.- - -- - - - -.- - - -- 03412 JAQUITH DANIEL 915.84 564.25 _ 03413 KORTUS .DONALD V 305.04 236.29 03444- 03 MCHULTY JOHN J 1, 195.39 155.75 Q3416 MEEHAN,JR JAMES E 997.38 589003 0341' --KETTLER D3bi --67 2. ZT- 03418 MOESCHTER RICHARD M i, 054.90 158.7 3 03419 MORELLI RAYMOND J 669.79 4' Y OF tMAPLEWOOD PAYROLL REPORT PAGE 3 CERTIFICATION REGISTEF CHECK DATE 03 -26 -82 CHECK NAME GROSS PAY NET PAY 6 4 2.1 L M11 - -- - _0 C N A L-D ----l b : 77 -6 2 e_43 03422 STAFNE GREGORY L 1, 016• T7 6 33.8 3 03423 STILL VEIP%'NON T 997.38 587.92 034 - 24 - . ---STOCKTOw _AP. L T 997 :38 647.97 03425o ZAPPA JOSEPH A 19197023 735.06 03426 BECKER RONALD D 1, 108.12 261.99 03427 CUSIC C -....aEN - _1.42 874. 03428 GRAF DAVID M 111 08+.29 510039 03429 LEE ROGER N 1.637.87 34 03431 NELSON CA M 1, 129.27 726.95 03432 RAZSKAZOFF DALE E 1, 084.61 1)2.88 0 3'4 3 3 . _RYAN I C H A.E - .10 8 : -i . y ..._- 5 - ff0 0 87 - -. - -- --- - - -- - -- - -- .. __ -_ . - - -- - -- - - -_ 03434 VOR WERK ROBERT E 1 164.76 230.20 03435 YOUNGREN .JAMES G 1, 064.54 628.34 03436 E JAFES - - - - -- -.898. ib 580 o 03437 SCHADT ALFRED C 1iP 122.46 667.90 03438 FLAUGHER JAYME L 677.54 432972 03439 FULER -- - .JAMES 586.62 03440 LINDNER KATHRYN E 5499 381.2 03441 NELSON KAREN A 617.08 382.78 03 - 442 .-AEL ON 03443 T MIC A 617.08 298.7.8 83444 WILLIAMS DUANE 1, 055.54 470977 w034 .._e A R T A -M A ___._ .__1. - __.5 3 6 9 .. .- -3 2 4_0 0 -- J Y OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL REPORT PAGE 4 CERTIFICATION REGISTER HEc cK DATE -o CHECK NAME GROSS PAY NET PAY 03446 ADER - -__.-nNNETH _14- -347:69 288.95 0 3447 - -WEGWERTH JUEI TH A 490.62 349.3 0 03448 CASS WILLIAM C 19157.08 552.82 03449 FREBERD - -RONA Lt' _...824:5 18.63 03450 HELEY RONALD J 827.78 528* 7i 03451 HCCHBAN JOSEPH M 756.80 501007 03452 KANE HICHAEL R 824.00 350935 03453 KLAUSING HENRY F 829.04 43208 03454 MEYER GERALD W 824.00 3 89.92 03455 REINERT EDWA -RD - --324 :00 518.63 03456 _T EVL IN, JR HARRY J 66 0.54 540.7 4 03457 ELIAS JAMES G 981.69 550.31 03458 G ]EISSLER WA_LTn 03 459 GESSELE JAMES T 893.54 583.28 03460 PECK DENNIS L 1, 092.13 598037 03461 PILLATZKE DAVID - --1, 157 :08 732:75 - 03+462 WYMAN JAMES N 797.54 536.43 03463 LUTZ DAVID P 562.62 380087 03464 BREHEIH ROGER ._ -._ - - -w - __9: -fit - - -470 :30 - -- - - - _ 0 5 _____EDSON _DAVID 6 840.00 549.97 03466 MUL WEE GEORGE W 76 9.61 473o2? 03467 NADEAU ---EDWA RD -853.60 03468 `NUTESON LAVERNE S 1,160.72 491.67 03469 OMEN GEF.ALD C 840.00 48i.96 O'3470-__--MACOONALD_ -_908:80 48 4 : 8 Y OF MAPLEWOOD PAYRCLL REPORT PAGE 5 CE RTIFICAT IO R:EGIST CHEC DATE 03 - 26 - 82 CHECK NAME GROSS PAY NET PAY 03471 03472 BRENNER LOIS 718.83 276.35 03473 KRUMMEL BAR B ARA A 268. Ti 149.. 0 01474 O-- OEGARD - - - - --08 -ERT .....i, 334.31 80 '.71 03475 STAPLES PAULINE M 1-9056.92 671.54 03476 BUR KE MYL E S P 824.00 433.57 03477 GERMAIN DAVID 84. D0 511.17 03478 GUSINDA MELVIN J 1, 160.72 626..27 03479 HELEY ROLA ND B 824.00 528.38 03480 LEMON -- -- -JEFFREY--- 03481 MARUSKA MARK A 824o. D0 509.68 03482 SANTA REED E 834.88 468.86 03483 TAUBMAN DOUGLAS J i, 0$3.06 638.56 03484 WARD R.OY G 320.31 246.32 03485 GREW JANET M 684.00 435.23 03486 SOUTTER - -CHRISTINE -68 -- 4 x-92 -._463.39 _ 03487 CHLEBECK JULY M 711.23 286.34 03488 OLSON GEOFFREY W 1 324 733.71 03489 EKSTRAND -THOMAS -_ -._ __815.00 461.85 03490 JOHNSON RANDALL L 873991 557.27 03491 O STROM MARJ OR I E 1,133.54 690.48 03492 -NE - -RCBEP%T - __J 857. -54 482.74 CHEC REGISTER TOTALS _104, 168.73 54 03370 Prettner Joseph. _ B_ 1 - 710910 105 55,202.46 r E - MEMORANDUM TO City Manager " FROM : Finance Director 1( t RE Disposal of Old Financial Records DATE March 25 1982 Authorization is requested to make application to the State for disposalofoldfinancialrecords. BACKGROUND For the past several years, the City has been mi crofi lmi n its financial9al records. The main reason for microfilming has been to conserve valuabl space in the City Hall--microfilming results in a 96/ reduction in the number of file cabinets and space required for records records are microfilmed, storag Onceg crofi lined the on qi nal copies are packed and sent to the Public Works Building for storage. (The State Auditor requires that theq •origina copies be kept for six years.) The microfilm copies are kept in the Ci Hall vault. Annually the City disposes of records that are over six ears old. However,owever,before the records can be destroyed the City is. requi red by law to submit the attached resolution and application for approval to the Statee. It should be noted that the application requests approval to destroy only the original copies. The microfilm copies will be kept as a permanent record. RECOMMENDATION The attached resolution is recommended for adoption. t 1 RESOLUTION WHEREAS, M.S.A. 138.17 governs the destruction of city records; and WHEREAS, a list of records has been presented to the council with a request in writing that destruction be approved by the council; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. That the Finance Director is hereby directed to apply to the Minnesota State Historical Society for an order authorizing destruction of the records as described in the attached list. 2. That upon approval by the State of.the attached application, the Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to destroy the records listed. PRA (Rev. 73) MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY 1500 Mississippi St. , St. Paul, MN 55101 APPLICATION FOR AUTHORITY TO DISPOSE OF RECORDS 7. AUTHORIZATION INSTRUCTIONS: Make original and throe copies. Complete items 2, 3 d, 5, 6 and 9e, b c. Use reverse side of form to continua records description. if more space is needed, use white bond paper similarily spaced. Send original and two copies to the above address. Retain one copy while I your application is being processed.You will receive an approved copy Of your application, which will be your authority to dispose of records. The approved copy should be retained permanently. NOTE: Laws of 197#. Chapter 529, Section 3 reads as follows: "'It is the policy of the legislature that the disposal and preservation of public records be controlled exclusively by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 138 and by this act, thus, no prior, special or general statute shall be construed to authorize or prevent the disposal of public recorch at a time or in a manner different than prescribed by such chapter or by this act and no general or special statute enacted subsequent to this act shallbeconstruedtoauthorizeorpreventthedisposalofpublicrecordsatatimeorinamannerdifferentthanprescribedinchapter138orinthisactunlesseitexpresslyexemptssuchrecordsfromtheprovisionsofsuchchapterandthisactbyspecificreferencetothissection." 1. TO: Minnesota Historical Society 2. FROM: CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Finance Depar tntent Agency or Off ice Subdivision or Section 3. Quantity of Records; cubic feet 10.2 8 or linear feet 4. Location of Records: Maplewood Public Works Buildini 5. Laws other than M.S. 138.17 that relate to the destruction or safekeeping of the records: None to our knowledge 6. 1 certify that the records listed on this application are accurately described, and that they have no further administrative, legal, or fiscal value for this agency. 3/24/82 Authorized ignature ate FINANCE DIREC TOR Title Under the authority of Minnesota Statutes 138. f7, it is hereby ordemd that the records listed on this application be destroyed, except as shown below (item 8). Director, Minnesota Historical Society Date Legislative or State Auditor Date Anorney General Application No. Date Received Date 8. Exceptions to Destruction. (for tae by Director, Legislative Auditor, State Auditor, and Attorney General only.) 9. Description of Records • Describe each record series or type of record separately. Number each series, beginning with a . Item No I b. Name of record, form numbers, content, use ge g pusage, errsn ment, original. duplicate. or microfilmed I C. inclusive Dates 1.FINANCIAL RECORDS Monttu3• -feral Ledger Books Sub - ledger Investments Accounts Payable Listings Monthly Bank Statements Monthly Batch Proof Monthly Sub - ledger Monthly Sub - ledger Payroll Deductions Monthly Budget Report End of Year Sub - ledger Original 1975 Original 1975 Original 1975 Or ig ina 1 1975 Or igina l 197.5 Or igina l 1975 original 1975 Or ig ina 1 1975 Or igina 1 1975 Series b. Name of record, form numbers content usage, arrangement, c. Inclusive No. original, duplicate, or microfilmed. Da 1.CON' T .) FINANCIAL RECORDS End of Year Vendor Cards Original 1975 Expenditure vouchers & Documents 560 - 1220; #13643 - 17193) Original 1975 Receipt Books ( #21501 - 24800) Original 1975 Journal Entries Original 1975 2.PAYROLL RECORDS Cancelled Payroll Checks (#7529 - 10162) Original 1975 Bi- weekly Payroll Registers Original 1975 Quarter to Date Payroll Registers Original 1975 Payroll Deduction Listings Original 1975 Payroll Deductions Sub- ledger Original 1975 30 SEWER BILLING RECORDS Listing of Amounts Billed by Account, First Quarter thr u Fourth Quarter Original 1975 Listing of . Payments of Account, First Quarter thru Fourth Quarter Original 1975 Y QQ Y MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Public Works ' SUBJECT: Removing County State Aid Highway Designation DATE: March 25, 1982 E-3 On December 17, 1981 the City Council adopted a resolution approving the removal of County State Aid Designation on the following roads: Prosperity Road (CSAH64) from County Road B to White Bear Avenue (0.23 miles) McKnight Road (CSAH68) from Minnehaha Avenue to Stillwater_ Avenue (0.57 miles) Ramsey County now requests Maplewood to adopt a final resolution, in their format, to comply with MnDOT requirements. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution. Whereas the Board of Ramsey County Commissioners adopted a re solution on 1982, revoking the County State Aid Highway designations on the roads hereinafter described within9Y the City of Maplewood under the provisions of Minnesota Laws, Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved by the City Council of Maplewood that the roads described as follows: Prosperity Road (CSAH 64) from County Road B to White Bear Avenue (0.23 miles) McKnight Road (CSAH E8) from Minnehaha Avenue to Stillwater Avenue (.0.51 miles_ be, and hereby are, revoked as County State Aid Highways of Ramsey County subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota. Be It Further Resolved, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized to forward two certified copies of this resolution to the Public Works Director of Ramsey County who will submit them to the Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota for his consideration. s 1 Date Mayor's signature Two certi f ted copies- required F ,1Sam MEMORANDUM F Z TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANTS: OWNERS DATE: City Manager - Director of Community Development Zone Change and Lot Area Variance 2010 Clarence ( enclosed maps.) Anthony Caron and Wendy DuFresne Arnold and Gladys Pfarr February 18, 1982 SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL Approval of a l area variance and zone change from M - Light Manufacturin to R -2, Residence District (Double Dwelling) , to construct a double -dwel ling. CONCLUSIONS Analysis The proposed rezoning would be compatible with the Land Use Plan and surrounding development. opment. I t should be noted that the density of block 10 would be 33 people per net acre with the double - dwelling. The allowable density is 34 people P er net acre. Th_i s may limit any further development of the applicant property. Recommendation I. Approval of the lot area variance for 355 square feet, on the basis that: 1. The lot is irregular in shape. 2. The variance is relatively small. 3. The double - dwell would not exceed the maximum allowed density in the Land Use Plan. The variance is approved with the condition that the metal storage shed be relocated so that it is at least five feet from l 11, before a building permit is issued for lot 11. II. Approval of the enclosed resolution rezoning lot 11, block 10 of the Gladstone Addition from M -1 to R -2, on the basis that: = The rezoning would be compatibleb7e wi tP h the Land Use Plan and the use ofadjacentproperty. 2. The existing M -1 Zone is not compatible 'p b1e w th the area. 2 BACKGROUND Site Description Size: an irregular sized lot, with 98.8 feet of frontage and 11,645 square feet of area, Existing land use: undeveloped Easements: a drainage easement across the south thirty feet of the entire property. Surrounding Land Uses North: The applicant's single - dwelling, garage, and metal shed.. The shed appears to be partially located on the lot to be rezoned, East: The easterly half of an undeveloped alley right -of -way and vacated Claire Street right -of -way. Across the alley is an apartment building, South: Railroad right -of -way, proposed to be abandoned. West: Clarence Street. Across Clarence Street, undeveloped land, planned for Medium Density Residential use and zoned for Light Manufacturing. Past Actions January 20, 1966: Lots 1 - 6 and 12 - 22 block 10, Gladstone Addition were rezoned from R -1, Residence District (single-.dwelling) to M -1, Light Manufacturing, Lots 7 -11, block 10 were specifically excluded from the zone change. November 10, 1969: A zoning map update was adopted which rezoned the applicant's property for M -1, Light Manufacturing use. May 1, 1980: Council vacated Claire Street - abutting the applicant's property to the south and the west half of the alley abutting lot 11, subject to retention of a thirty foot wide drainage easement over the Claire Street right -of -way. DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Planning 1. Land Use Plan designation: Rh, High Density Residential. 2. Zoni ng : M -1 Light Manufacturing. 3. Density permitted: 34 persons. per net acre. 4. Existing density:Block 10)30 persons /net acre 5. Proposed density:Block 10)33 persons /net acre 6. Policy Criteria from the Land Use Plan: Page 18 -30 (Plan Update) Hi gh Density Residential (RH), This classification is designated for such housing types as apartments, two - family homes, townhomes , nursing homes, dormatori es , or elderly housing. 3 7 . Compliance with the Land Use laws: A. Section 915.030 of the Zoning Code states that: "In any instance where the governing body is required to consider an exception or change in the zoning ordinance or map i n accordance with the provisions of this ordinance, it shall, among other things: 1. Assure itself that the proposed change is -consistent with the spirit, i 'purpose, and intent of the zoning ordinance. 2. Determine that the proposed change w i l l not substantially change, injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded, 3. Determine that the proposed change will serve the best interest of the Village, the convenience of the community (where applicable) , and the public welfare." 6. Section 905.030 requires a double - dwelling lot to be at least 12,000 square feet in area. The applicant's lot is 11,645 square feet requiring a variance of 355 square feet. Public Works 1. Sewer and water are available in Clarence Street, Enclosures: 1. Location Map 2, Property Line Map 3. Applicant's Letters of Justification 4. Rezone Petition 5. Resolution 4 Lake h ; wo < AL KOHLMAN AVE. K i COUNTY ROAD "C" L W Z EDGE KILL cr W J V n ` DEMON 4, AVE. 200S [ i t W • m SE XT . -KT GERVAIS AVE. VAIS s - G ANDVIEWFz _ I[ VIKING 'oR. Kl Ile r Lake R. R. :. 28 FROST v a 5 < < 27 F N AVE. 62 J tar1r . 'g g 3 < it FRISDIE AVE.r 0 F 3 RIPLEY AVE,Q Lake PH IA ALE s I.- n to Pho/en z _ -' O t Z 62 W A P LL NT 30 rl I SHERREN AVE OPE AVE. LARK AVE. LARK AYE. h RO LAURIE R0. Z a LAURIE RD x 25 r T i AVE. D 55 64ai t9 RKE AVE. . s BU KE A << ELDRIOG AVE 1rA404 V J PUBLIC MON T Q AVE. l b4 1 > SLOG. SKILLMA AVE. = MAR RIS Soo R ROS IWOOD AVE. RY AN Jt o SU M ER A 4 w W Z W Wakefield Lok e s 29 SOP , A c z PRI AV ST, PA U L Map 1 LOCATION MAP 7 ti LARK AVE. OUN ILELAN - D] JUNC ON AvE. U AN s ~VE H VJ o AYpN 4 N 1 r t . 11 `.h. ^ fir . ..... f -. L. VOOP La- IF 7P L Ir.Apart men s 18 -P1 ex -- 4 r7 t --- ---- i ---- I t Appl scant s Dwe11 in E --, and Garage - .: --. a ,,..; - ; v,,. r_ 1z. ` '"! Ago ao ;ti . ::- - } its a, -' rte'_ F..1_" I f r , ..Or r sl Iod,F RYA N F• / • l .• f Ar Lij zc 1 v, v, } _ r ACC; .. 3 t iris r Ell SNOW UJ • ' L t , i 3 t r Er i t • N ' - ' ` 1 ice MAP 2 PROPERTY MAP Drainage Easement 4 N Le Zcxs.4 4..- • , , ' ../'y .,-'. ` j- -+.. --- ?.. =.-0 - - Vii, V v JV _ Ilk r p i 14L c t V w r K f J f Q t ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER REZONE PETITION rn pe y c:> / 19 0 .S / 0 . _ 1 4- PETITION We, the undersigned property owners collectively represent 50% or more of the adjoining property owners within 200 feet of the requested rezone property described on the attached application in accordance with Section 915.010 of the Maplewood Municipal Code. We petition the Maplewood City Council for a change in official zoning classification on the attached described property from Lic- zoning to dQ— zoning, Our names can be verified, as legal constituted land owners, on the certified abstract listing owners of land within 350 feet of the requested rezone area) which is required to be filed in conjunction with the rezone application and this petition. The written signature of any person's name on this petition is indication of thaw person's understanding of the proposed zone, the proposed location and an endorse- ment for approval -of such change, SIGNATURE r J PRINT NAME I " vfr•T. + .ice! '7 T / r 1 1 tr 4 r{.. - "' "L - r : 7 L Sr. Tom_T I Li 4 V 11 • Y ' 7r, 141, /4 o' l 21 rs y /V /' d - 11-ooZA A A ABSTRACT 'CERT . LIST NO. 0;L RESOLUTION NO. COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS AND FACTS AND APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE WHEREAS, a rezoning procedure has been initiated by Anthony Caron and Wendy DeFresne for a zone change from M -1, Light Manufacturing to R -2, Double Dwelling for the following described property: Lot 11, Block 10 and accruing vacated street and alley, Gladstone Addition, Section 15, Township 29, Range 22 WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning procedure is as follows: 1. That a rezoning procedure has been initiated by Anthony Caron and Wendy DuFresne, pursuant to Chapter 915 of the Maplewood Code; 2. That said rezoning procedure was referred to and reviewed by the Maplewood City Planning Commission on the 22nd day of February, 1982, at which time said Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning procedure be ; 3. That the Maplewood City Council held a p u b l i c hearing to consider the rezoning procedure, notice thereof having been published and mailed pursuant to law; and 4. That all persons. present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and/or present written statements, and the Council considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY -BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA that the above-described rezoning be granted on the basis of the following findings of: fact: 1. The rezoning is, compatible with the Land Use Plan and the use of adjacent property. 2. The existing M -1 zone is not compatible with the area. Adopted this day of Attest: 19 . Mayor City Clerk 8. NEW BUSINESS A. Rezoning and Variance - 2010 Clarence (Caron and DuFresne) IVI Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting approval of a lot area variance and a zone change to R -2. Double d w e l l i n g . Staff is recommending approval of the request. The Commission discussed with Secretary Olson rezoning the complete ii area to be consistent with the Land Use Plan. fl Anthony Caron, 2010 Clarence Street, said the duplex would fit thet, area. Commissioner Kishel moved the Planning Commission reconnend approval of the lot area variance for 355 square feet, on the basis that: 1. The lot is irregular in shape. 2. The variance is relatively small. 3. The double-dwelling would not exceed the maximum allowed density in the Land Use Plan. The variance "be'"'approved with the condition that the metal storage shed be relocated so that it is at least five feet from Lot 11, before a building permit is issued for lot 11. _ Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl ,Prew, Pel l i sh, Sl etten, Whitcomb, Fischer, Hejny, Ki shel , Howard Commissioner Ki shel moved the Planning Commission recommend the City approve the resolution to rezone lot 11, block 10, Gladstone Addition on the basis that: 1. The rezoning would be compatible with the Land Use Plan and the use of adjacent property. 2. The existing M -1 zone is not compatible with the area. Commissioner Fischer ' Seconded - Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl , Prew, Pel l i sh, Sl etten, Whitcomb, Fischer, Hejny, Ki shel , Howard = MEMORANDUM 3 TO: City Manager PROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Zoning Code Amendment - Accessory Apartments APPLICANT: Department of Community Development DATt: December 2, 1981 r a Request Amend the Zoning Code to allow accessory apartments within single dwellings, b speciala1 exce ti on permit.y p P p Arnhl Am 1. Several requests of this type have been received by Staff. Recently a proposal was received to legalize an existing 300 square foot rental u n i t within a single dwelling which prompted this amendment p ro osal .P 2. With the increasing costs of housing, there is an increasing trend toward converting or adding a small apartment to single dwellings. So far, the number that Staff is aware of is small. This w i l l probably increase. Staff feels that Council should address this issue before it becomes a problem. 3. Eig -five percent of U. S. families cannot afford the $904 monthly interest payment required for a typical mortgage of $60,000 at 18% interest, accordingtoastudybytheNationalAssociationofHome. Builders, W.: 4. The multi - family rental vacancy rate is only 5.4% in the metropolitan area and 4.5% in Maplewood. Ob j of the Amendment 1. To make it possible for homeowners with financial problems to sta y in their homes despite rising property taxes, heating bills, and maintenance costs. 2. To allow people to help house other members of their extended fami or in some cases domestic employees or friends. 3. To increase the diversity of the community's housing stock in terms of price and availability of rental units, helping the City to meet local hous i n 9feeds, and to provide its share of lower income housing to meet regional deeds, without significant effects on the character of the commun 4. To provide security, especially when the owner is often awa . -_y _ L 5. To provide regulations that are enforceable and, therefore, brf n illegalleal conversions g g ons un er better control and make i t possible to know the number of accessory apartment conversions that are taking place. Issues Status /Property Values /Neighborhood Character In single - family zones, people may have bought their homes because they wanted to 1 i ve in a single family neighborhood. They may be concerned that intrusion of accessory apartments will decrease the status or value of their own home, for them or for potential purchasers. However, if accessory I apartments are provided in a_ way that does not seriously interfere with neighborhood character,. accessory apartments could actually increase the property value of structures that include there by providing a source of income to the oviner. Some residents may a l s o be afraid that accessory apartments will introduce a "different type of person" who will not "fit into the neighborhood." But this may be more likely to occur if a house ends up being rented to a group of unrelated individuals,* because the owner could not afford to stay in it without the income from an accessory apartment. Parking and Traffic Congestion The enclosed ordinance would not cause a parking problem or traffic congestion. The ordinance limits the number of occupants of both accessory apartment and principal dwelling to the definition of family. Visual Impact In most cases,, it would be impossible to know from the outside that a house contained an accessory apartment. The accessory apartment ordinance would also limit the area and location of doors. In some cases, the addition of a rental unit may make it financially possible for the owner to fix up the outside of his house, resulting in an indirect positive visual impact of the accessory apartment. Too Many Accessory Apartments There may be a concern that legalizing accessory apartments may result in too many conversions. However, several communities in the Boston area that legalized accessory apartments were surprised at the small number of owners who have taken advantage of the provision. The City of Lincoln, in the Boston area., legalized accessory apartments a number of years ago and included a provision in its zoning bylaw restricting apartments to a maximum of 10 percent of the houses in the Town. This restriction was removed in 1978 because nothing even approaching that many apartments was created. There i's simply not the demand. Permit to Property Owner Rather than Location Members of the Council and Housing Authority have expressed a preference to issue permits to the property owner, if accessory apartments are to be per- mitted. The City Attorney's opinion (attached), is that permits should be issued to a location not an individual, to avoid possible legal challenges and damageliabilityregardingdenialofequalopportunity. Issuance of a effii t subject to conditions, will insure compatibility with the adjacent nei ghborbood , no matter who owns the property. 2_ Recommendation (At least four votes required for approval) Adoption of the attached ordinance, amending Section 904.010 of the Zoning Code to ermi t accessory apartments within single dwellings, by special exceptionPp permit. Enclosures 1. Resolution for Code Amendment 2. -July 1981 Planning Magazine Article 30 = Minneapolis Tribune Editorial 40 - Letter from City Attorney, dated 1 -21 -82 3 - ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 904 AND 916 OF THE MAPLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ACCESSORY APARTMENTS BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD AS FOLLOWS: Secti on 1 . Secti on 904.010 is hereby amended to include the folq owi ng new subsection 8.1 An accessory apartment, by special exception permit, subject to, but not limited to, the following requirements: a. The dwelling shall remain owner - occupied. b. An accessory apartment shall not exceed 600 square feet of floor area. The habitable area of the dwelling, less the accessory apartment, shall not be less than 600 square feet. c. The total area of the structure shall comply with Section 904.010 6) of City Code. d. There must be an off - street parking space for each resident's vehi cl e. e . No more than one entrance on the front of the dwelling shall be allowed, except by approval of the City Council. f. A deed restriction shall be recorded to run with the property stating that, "Accessory apartments within. a single dwelling, are subject to the requirements in the Maplewood Zoning Code." g. The occupants of an accessory apartment and attached single dwelling shall be considered as one family for purposes of determining the allowable number of residents, Section 2. Section 916.010 is hereby amended to include the following subsection: 23. Accessory apartment: An apartment with less than 600 square feet, which is attached to and physically separated from a single dwelling. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Council this . day of ,1982. Attest: C1 er k Mayor Ayes - Nays - jF =i >. ' sL - - +tr_. ti_^ • i `uhf -Ti , = . -+ mar- .<<.t a y frr. ,; ,s ° '''1,_ a, • r ~!.Y 3 - , ar .` - ,• f . r".4 -• i Z.s. { _ .. c' f'.: • c r _y - ' i.-- ,or4. ' :' r __+-- r,.- ,_w.c'i .t. ` cYi • .3 - • _ '' •.s --_fA, _ < cw ^''._ -+- y °'ir.`_ 'f }.. = , r•' .. .a,.,''.. -:''- 'z _. . 4: _ -- 5 -•+. -. .)` -.r T ,`.- t_` .:- s !i , ['• a . z ...ti it a - ii . a es - _ r- ft.'r .._ " = _ ..,` ''. - . ,a4 Wa r .+. - _a _ '' ° .,, ..:. -'- .}__ R.,, .... r i -' .r-..- 3- 1" . s+. .•s "-i f :"- - . .: •' _ - : , ter - _` - _ _ . _ F i ' t - _dt.c' - - t•' - .. - s. . - S*o s . c - _ ;' . .r- I ' -- y r i .. . s --- it -c - Y'Y s 'h -_'s _. <• ,r a ' - _ -= sr-' : c .,s _ Y t.. ° ...<' -. .. . -. _ - -- •*' - --' s - s : . - YF t • ie „S` _ 1 •... _ i,.. `' _ -'Y :r ' „ . !-?- : • i _ - - s- s _ . e _ - _'F .. - :... - R. _ i.•-s • 3i - - jtr.. ,r. '1... 4L _ .- 5-- v.. -J• _fir s v.` . s_s•'_ • • - ,''Fr s " -r w'ti.' _. ' - • i.- "/ e'A• •,03 " - Ya . -:. 4iV * t :. y - ~ _ s `'; r it .. ae _ .., ,ir '- ` . -_ . r-•' r T _ ; yr; - a as : af. •.• s: - ..'s__'7.i ' i_ - - -r :- _ ••}r -. • - _ - _•.a -_' '' s*• + '"' "- "` - - i a - . Ji, k ^s i` , t 3 a. .a... y r. 3. -6 ^ - ' - ;YaY. '.. - ._ 'Y•+: '' ..rte__ .-• r_.' -_ - _ 3 ':u. t ' a = t~ Y -••1€ 3j..7r i - r t w z - Y •-.a • ..` L: .r,! e . ; _x'15 T•' .: r , - - = T 7. - - •s n .s•r= _ r.r .. ...a s. i . Se 41: T _ , _ - AZ - ..fi'$ : `.. .__ _s - . ;.: :2: •.:r ar =r..a - .'a .3i- -+L _ +w - •t . a f-- • a s.Q- - - r .r•• 'a -. '.'.,..3 - ._ - •s _ , r „ - - f_ •- r art,_<- z-fir •S ._ .= i., r2€ _ ?. "' . - _ -- -r _ f V__ - }. s " eta r '- _ . 3 i`,s ... • =S - ,:."''` is -- ` _ y '-• - a _ _ _ viii t. C .:. . . L _ y . ?' F - -• JJ. _ - ` f' 1. • . ' f _' f --t s QT . > S^ T a "+ Ra ' l zLi.k _'_'S'` - : '" _;" _ . zs; r . . ._:_ - r Tom-"`= ' >s: s _''F 'rte ., _: .: • •i _"- ,. =t `= t " ` ', " 'j -# g `'.:. -•+:_ -. - - _.: _-. +w_ a_' :' •'^. '_. ,rt' - - i _: r ___= - •- '_,• • + it c #: rr - .• _ ;: .•,._ .. i : ' r_ T 7al._ - _ s 'G _ - - .. ., `•` s.q. -, = -.- Y y, _ '. _ a- _ .<. - - ..-.• _ _ -, 'sue - _ a ..•t .:N4 . ?w.., - {.t _ sue.:- #.. r ., TZ!r +. 's't. - <.•`. - 5c . _ -+ - x•+,a "•_ 'i`= _Yr - - ..-_ „__ + - in -`q _Jir 'i-- - _may, s:< - ., - - -' rs _ - _ _-;..4._! S' - - •'r -:4s =Y fir"T-t =il- '' S - '' _` , _ _ '.. •r; i..' .w -• ` L_ - '. ,. °'e -. ' ; , .c ' Tr. `! - -. _ ' = _ +i i '_` 3v. r _ -: . _. .... , 4 r' -;•sl°`' - .+A' - ''•r _ i ! r -a. _ a '° ..n._ _ ^ai -: .._ Z" *` - __!- -" + 3 rY: ..'.?T: R :- rsr #: S'-' .. _ .+" . ` • _- ' . - w<. _ , + •r , l4- . .•?'s. - 3 - - - - }, . - is. ' 4. s • +_.. i% : -'.'- . n- -" , 'i. :4, ' . -s "_- >sa• -- _. . _ .:_.a_ i,ef •- t. .,« - -. - a _ .--• ....- +_`s -. _- '''° - '°' ` - <;. - "_- L:.z - "-, _ . .. r<_,. .'-: _._ + r-.ai : . ' `_ _ - `-: ..'#-_` _ .r+S • . „!. 'E't' - - _ } T - - 1 •R's . s -` - • --3._ %s _ :+ - . .. ... mss. -a! •. _ s -, _ _ jam .. z • _' -_ ; • - 1 1 • _ _ <[. 4 . : _ :-___... it -_a• * '`f_ _ - - r ' Utr's16 i sz } '= - c iT '` . 1. I 11 t sar 7s -_ c '„• _ .- - ,_ _.tea - yizz • fir + - _. rz • - _ rte• +s..s _ }_ ...: _ _ _ `i y,."ti _ t/- ^ . - .-?' _ - ti ^ .r•• +~. , • ' - '•i - sr• 1 t - . f .+i -s s _ Y'•A'r<r '' S _ . I s- . re _ _ _ '_ a. _ .. s -' -i ¢ _ - _ '= - - - - _ 3 .. -: ` _ 4 _. .,. .z - _ ..- ' _ , • • • - .a.' - _ - _ -_ - z'• -' -_ Jai -. . -: _. _ -_ _. . - __ _ _ e.-t Sz,'rt ' s' -ra, - -.`y _`_ _. _ { y. i . • f- _ 1'` ''' -' ~ -'. - - i _-_- _s - a-.. _ P -.. _ _ . _ - a c'_ - _ _ - -. i _ - r _ . i • c- • w r `n _7F S )* J•_ S 1 { r .' - 'G '.. . - - i - ':! _ _. s. _ ./ i • • .¢, : r ' _ _ • V `i_ • 7 ; _¢• s_ ' - - - o i.- _ ss-' _- y' .'L ' "_ _ v - i,"rl,. ,`<•I i -- rT +'fir -s -r4 _. ;_ "' s. s a r -•2 - t i 1R i. i - fit, r -- ca •a. • S,-' - - € _' s ; z -.tea. E f j -_ - _ _ ^ --s _`..:: -_ - -- 2 _r _ __ _., -s ' -'c• y. -_. s = r : -: s_'a- i`'s- az>_ +. t _ - -'''` i_ i-_ _.. a ! _' z l '- y``''a - .•.c.- "z -- - =.i^ - _ ..r,_ ' ` 4 _°t- " ' - '' zs - - - , a.gz -= _ iiL.LL.77T" - - - - ` w -' '' rs_ c j c : • ; . .. ! - ! ' s_ ar - • -tom - - r _ . - __ r' _ t -' _7 - sf _11 a tti w4 i}. I !- "t- _T114 }S.r ,S Tt :T -_'" f'_ s -_ -+'F: • -_e. z-iec_ •a = - .. _ - - . -s __a`.. 'L' .. - S Carving u the American Dream By Patrick H. Hare Suppose a planner had a magic method of developing invisible rental units in single- family neigh- borhoods. Suppose the planner 1knew that a public proposal to per - mit development of the units would probably be opposed by neighboring homeowners. Suppose the planner also knew that if nothing were said, the units would be developed any - way--in violation of the town's zoning and building ordinances. Roughly speaking, this is the only course of action open to a planner who feels there are benefits to single- family conversions " --sub- dividing large, single - family houses to create small "accessory apart- ments," or "mother -in -law apart- ments." There is a catch, however. If nothing is done, illegal apartments may spread until they become so common they have to be made legal. But, if planners propose legaliza- tion, they may trigger strict enforce- ment, which could delay or even stop development of the units. It's clear, though, that interest is growing. Led by the articles of Andree Brooks in the New York Times, newspapers in Long Island, Connecticut, and New Jersey have begun to follow the spread of ac- cessory apartments. Phyllis Santry of the Tri-State Regional Planning Commission in New York City surveyed the communities her com- mission serves and estimated that over 70 percent of them have noted the existence of legal or illegal conver- sions= Many communities estimate that 20 to 20 percent of their single - family housing stock contains conversions. George Sternlieb of Rutgers Uni- versity says that accessory apart- ments are the wave of the future. In newspaper interviews, he has toed 24 PLvViM about turning "one5ies into twosies." Whoever invented the split - leve ranch must have been clairvoyt,he says. "It converts overnight." -- Tit for tat In today's housing market, single - family conversior* offer practical advantages to - owners and ten- ants. The owner trades unused space and a small investment for rental income. The tenant gets an apart- ment in a single - family neighborhood at below - market rent, because the apartment can be created at lower cost than a new unit. According to Frank Thompson, the building in- spector of Babylon, Long Island, which has about 4,000 conversions, the cost of conversion varies from 1,000 to add a kitchen to the lower level of a ranch house to over $30, to add a double dormer and make other modifications to a Cape Cod. Obviously, the less expensive a house is to convert, the more likely it is to be converted. Plainfield, New Jersey, which has a model program designed to help older homeowners convert, estimates the costs at about 10, 000 per unit The monthly in- come from the rental units varies widely but can easily be two or three times the monthly cost of the additional investment, even if that investment reflects today's interest ra tes. In addition, older homeowners g can bargain with tenants about re- ductions in rent in return for such services as helping with home main - tenance and occasional transporta- tion. Tenants may be able to provide t these services fairly easily, and both landlords and tenants benefit. Finally, tenants add security just by being there. They alleviate two common fears of older homeowners: the fear of break -ins ark the fear of being alone in an emergency. There goes the neighborhood However, according to Santry's survey, many homeowners view single- family conversions as the be- ginning of a movement to change the single- family character of the neigh- borhood. Some express fear that speculators will buy up houses for conversion to rental duplexes. They worry about absentee landlords, increased traffic, and code violations. How does the planner deal with such a politically controversial hous- ing trend? Proposals to legalize single - family conversions have met with stong resistance. On LongIsland, for example, where it's generally accepted that illegal conver- sions are widespread, only one town, Accessory apartments may be the wave of the future but right now there's resistance to legalization. Babylon, has taken steps to legalize them. Town planner Richard Spirio has an inch -high stack of news clip- pings devoted to the public outcry over Babylon's ordinance. Mel Barr, the town planner of Westport, Con- necticut, is caught between 4,650 accessory apartments that zoning officials can't shut down without controversial evictions and the oppo- sition of homeowners who fight any proposal to legalize the illegal apartments. Keep them on the QT Ironically, it appears to be in al- most everybody's interest to "keep them on the QT," according to Santry. For homeowners who have installed illegal apartments, making them legal means higher assessments and the risk of being caught if rental income is not reported on tax returns. Even neighbors concerned about deterioration of their area have a stake in keeping quiet about the apartments, because the fact that they are illegal makes landlords take special care to keep their tenants in line. _ A few years ago, Hartford's West End Civic Association considered trying to legalize the apartments in its large single - family houses and then decided against it. Members reasoned that, if the apartments were illegal, an anonymous call to the building department could shut down an undesirable landlord. A proposal to make them legal in an adjoining West Hartford neighbor-hood was roundly defeated. Going legit There are ways to deal with many of the objections to conversions. One is to permit conversions only by owner - occupants, who presum- ably will not want to see the neigh- borhood they live in deteriorate. This provision also keeps speculators from entering the single- family mar- ket and creating investment prop- erties. Another approach is to pass regulations that minimize such exte- rior changes as additional front doors that could change the visual character of the neighborhood. A third approach is to grant permits on a case -by -case basis so each con- version can be checked out. Yet another means of dealing with opposition is to point to a nearby town where accessory apartments are already legal. Babylon surrounds the incorporated village of Linden- hurst, where accessory apartments have been legal for years; and Baby- lon could easily use the stability of Lindenhurst's housing stock as an example. Even so, there was still substantial opposition in Babylon, as noted earlier. Some towns make the occupants' age a criterion for granting conver- sions. Westport permits conversions if either the owner or renter is 62 or over. Another common approach is to permit apartments only for rela- tives of homeowners; these apart- ments often are referred to as in -law apartments. Policing problems The problem with these two ap- proaches is enforcement. What hap- pens when the relatives move out? What happens when the old people die? What happens when the prop- erty is sold? The extra units tend to be rented to someone who is neither elderly nor related. In other words, legalizing apart- ments for specific groups tends to seed a crop of i&gal apartments available for use W anyone. Fairfax County, Virginia, has responded to this threat by making homeowners who install apartments for relatives sign an agreement making them liable to pay a $1,000 - a - day fine for every day the apartment is used by some- one other than relatives. July 1981 is Ld-dilp T.`" = " ..+ • . ` ` - - 'mss. . '1"_ ^'T's . t. .+.....• .i.-- :..,,. ' j a ' . ..71r .1. ,.,, ter• t - ..:.Y ice "mar : C.Ls j 41 411P Ar AZ L i ' ii - .. y` = _ - ,r ..rte . 'i' w• .1 .• - Y .- t r' x .l^. " %•"' , J' 4P 304 Lf op 0 AmI:,- n a -- I ;Z 0 0Cri Ae 4t I to il i Quo ; Q {`' • • • t 11 1 ILI Me r" ..: : -xr.. _ {_'- . f e • I _ t-.. ,. f ` t ', +'fin' ^ ezIL j'J . ti. •Zu,- :,r+sa ,.}..•:J V I • 'ate • - ' ?'... .. - ..j qty .. a.tY `v I a i : G"i •- .:" T' X 0 G 4 tr. ?A•s3'''' I w Ir 1. i 36.1 A :.. ` LAt :7t. Tf -A- may, J - t uL J -!: L,r' R _ •J.. a t.. 1!•41 y _\!— S r .a: t . ? . ' -• T t •s t 1 s.. - i •, - •"• - jti • ../1 - • r- K _5.. + .r;y V!^_7t "e'•]L - `.L''.- s:±'.w's i;.:t - •..!':c- 1i%.. -t. Q ff.• ..• c..A'_ + _* .,.i 2 • '"'*'..` _M l = c 7 - Jt r,t'r. -Yi :L,'',_; .r -rr, " j`.+ a , y!„ .cam —. _. ..f,.,, ?`'._ -! Short of such a regulation, there isn't much that can be done to stop a legal apartment from becoming il- legal. The homeowner has very little to lose by trying to rent an apart- ment that is already installed. As- suming the neighbors don't complain, the building inspector's only recourse is what one planner calls a "search and destroy mission." The resulting evictions are less than ideal from everyone's point of view. Also, as a study by the Metropolitan Area Planning Council in Boston points out, provisions restricting use to relatives or older people may inhibit homeowners from creating apart- ments. They fear that their in- vestment will become worthless if their relative no longer lives in the apartment. Going slow Nonetheless, regulations that subtly sow the seed of conversions may be the planner's only politcally feasible choice. When zoning to legalize accessory apartments was proposed to a midwestern planning director, his reaction was, 'It's hap- pening anyway, so let's just let it happen." Letting it happen, either by nonenforcement of existing regu- lations or partial legalization, may build a constituency for eventual legalization, if only to permit inspec- tion and correction of code violations. It also may build in a problem that has to be, solved later. Now that con- versions are legal in Babylon, the town is considering offering low - interest loans to owners who are willing to legalize their two - family arrangements; the loans would help pay for the upgrading now required before a two - family permit can be issued. Tax trouble One of the carrots of ten held out to taxpayers is the tax revenue that accessory apartments would provide. But this benefit may be illusory. In Babylon, the average assessment increase has been only $115, 'and a report on mother apartments by the Portland, Oregon, Growth Management Task Force suggests that new revenue would, at best, be offset by administrative and enforce- ment costs. Clearly, advocates of legalization can't promise too much. Large tax increases will substantially reduce the incentive to create accessory apartments or even to bring existing illegal apartments under the auspices of the law. Closely related to the question of assessments is the possibility that families in accessory apartments will add to the school population, thus leading to an increase in property taxes to meet school costs. Barbara Dietz, a real estate agent and active member of the North End Civic Association of Floral Park, Long Island, estimates there are about 500 accessory apartments in her town, 60 of them with children. She feels that it is particularly unjust that owners of houses occupied by school - age children don't pay increased as- sessments for their illegal apartments. On the other hand, the lack of children might make some older sub- urbs feel a sense of loss of commu- nity. These towns might bend over backwards to be lenient toward fam- ilies with children. How big? Children also raise the question of the size of accessory apartments —an area in which regulations vary greatly. Boston's Metropolitan Area Planning Council surveyed 23 com- munities with accessory apartments. It found that only 10 towns regulated 26 Planning JVtinneapolis Tribune 11 sr Established 1867 Charles W. Bailey Editor Wallace Allen Associate Ecktor Frank Wright Managhg Edtor Leonard Inskip Eclitorial Editor Donald R. Dwight Pusher r - J4A Tap ire a source o Minneapolis t _ decisions Y ahead Minneapolis needs more rental housing. Much of it will have to be provided by new construction. But city officials are becoming increasingly aware that a ready -built potential supply of rental housing lines the streets of the city's neighborhoods: part of the city's stock of single- family housing could be converted to two-family use. Aldermen are seeking ways to make that possible without overcrowding or neighborhood deterioration. Those efforts de- serve support. • The problem at which those efforts are aimed was outlined graphically at a Metropolitan Council housing conference earlier this year. James Solum of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency told the conference that the metropolitan area, in the 1980% will need as many new housing units as It added in the fast- growing 1970s. But today's prices and Inter - est rates dictate that fewer people will be able to buy housing, so a far greater proportion of those additional units must be for renters. Moreover, those same economic factors have pushed up build - ing costs,. That makes It unlikely that new construc- tion will provide all the needed additional units. 'A lot of people — mostly renters -- will have to be housed somewhere else. Making room for that "somewhere else" in a city's existing_ housing stock would require relaxation of zoning codes, at least in selected areas. That would have to be done carefully, to maintain neighbor. hood quality and assure safe, sanitary housing. But the advantages could be twofold. U owners could divide -their houses and share them with renters„ they would have added income for house pay. ments. For many, the added income could be What Thursday, October 15, 1981 rental housing makes home - ownership possible. And for renters, such changes could add significantly to the number and kind — of housing units available to them. Some specific zoning changes are already being considered for Minneapolis. Alderman parker Trostel of the Seventh Ward, for Instance, is inter - ested in an ordinance that would permit multi- family use of large houses — a so-called "mansion ordinance" — in some areas now restricted to single- family or two-family housing. Such a changewouldhavetobecarefullydrafted, she notes, to minimize impact on surrounding houses. Each con- verted property, for example, would have to pro- vide ample of- street parking for its residents. But such an ordinance could put an underutilized re- source to work to house more people. Another example: Both Trostel and Eighth `yard Alderman Mark Kaplan have looked into the possi- bilities of "cluster zoning," which Would permit flexible ways to meet minimum lot-Sim standards in designated areas. Under that plan, housing couldbeclusteredonsmallerlots, and the rest of the required open space be clustered in another part of the area -- where soil conditions make construe tion difficult, for instance, or where a buffer is needed alongside a railroad track or commercial zone, The aldermen say that other options will be ex- plored In the months to come, both to provide more rental housing and to enable more people to buy or retain their homes. Kaplan notes, for instance, that many senior citizens would like to convert their houses into duplexes, ndt only for the added in- come, but also for greater security and help in maintenance. Zoning changes to matte such uses possible must be - made wisely. U they are, theycouldcleartheWayformoreefficientuseof available resources to help meet the housing needs of the 1980x, • -` T apartment size and five specified a maximum, usually 600 square feet. This inconsistency persists in ordinances in other regions. It reflects local residents' competing concerns about the quality of the apartments -io be created as opposed to the desire-to maintain the single - family character of the neighborhood. The Weston ordinance avoids the issue by using subjective language. It permits one accessory apartment in a "single family owner occupied dwelling. provided it is . . clearly a subordinate part thereof." However logical it may seem to some, to others planning for the creation of accessory apartments seems to be planning for the subdivi- sion of the American dream. This may be the real cause of the contro- versy surrounding the legalization of accessory apartments, not practi-cal matters like apartment size. Such feelings may also explainthelackofenthusiasmintowns where accessory apartments have been made legal. Two months after Portland, Oregon, began its Add -a- Rental program, no applications to create legal accessory apartmentshadbeenreceived. When Lincoln, Massachusetts, legalized accessory apartments several years ago, it in- cluded a provision in its zoning bylaws restricting the apartments to a maximum of 10 percent of the houses in the town. This restriction was removed in 1978 because no- where near that number of apart- ments was created. And in Babylon, which legalized accessory apartments in February1980, almost every one of the 900 applications received within the first 10 months were to legalize exist- ing apartments "Only . five or six applications for new apartmentshavecomeinsincetheprogram started," says Ed Thompson of Babylon's building division. It's clear that simply legalizing accessory apartments will not neces- sarily result in the creation of large numbers of them. On the other hand, prohibiting them may not do much to keep them from spreading. Apparently, they involve a planning issue on which the curtain is only beginning to rise. Patrick Hare is a planning consultant in Washington, D.C. He is preparing a PAS report on accessory apartments for APA. A LAIS, BANNIGAN & CIRESI, P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING STN AND CEDAP SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 255101 DONALD L. LAIS JOHN F. BANNIGAN. JR. JEROME p. C1RES1 PATRICK J KELLY January 21, 1982 City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Attention: Mr. Randall Johnson Associate Planner Dear Randy: AREA CODE 612 224.5781 In rep to y ourletter of January 7, 1982 concerning the issuing p of special exception permits to the property owner rather than the P roperty for home occupations and accessory apartments, I wish to advise as follows: After carefull y reviewin g the matter, it is apparent that granting of these permits to an individual for a specific purpose neces- saril y includes granting the permit to the location. To subse- q y yuentlden someone a continuance of the same home occupation or use of an accessory apartment would result in an arbitrary and capricious action on the part of the future Council and could render the Cit y liable for damages for denial of equal treatment under the U.S. Constitution. It is therefore, my opinion that the permits, regardless of how they are g ranted have to run with the property and it would be better gtosostateright in the policy and in the granting of such exceptionchsecialetion so as not to mislead parties into believing that such a special exception could be denied in the future. Very truly yours, Ld fS, BANNIG ' onald L. Lais P . A . From: Di. of Com . Develop. Referred to: Vi13a Village -1 , Finance a. ir L "G' IDir. oy Parrs & Dir. of Pub. Sai'ti ;y ; Dir. of Pub. World Fire Marshall Other <<•.: -ir 'n;+ Transmittal Da r C. Code Amendment - Accessory Apartments Secretary Olson said the proposal is to amend the Code to allow accessory apartments within single dwellings by special exception permit. The Commission reviewed the - requirements proposed to permit an accessory apartment as outlined in the ordinance. They also discussed the added density which could result in each neighborhood from this - hype of use, Grant `Hatl ey.. 1569 E. County Road C, said he was in favor of the proposed ordinance change. He thought it would be more desirable than having a duplex, as this would be owner occupied. Roger Cobb, 1559 E. County Road C, said he does favor the amendment. He said the financial arrangement with the accessory apartment is favorable to both the landlord and the renter. Commissioner Prew moved the Planning Commission recommend the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance, amending Section 904.010 of the Zoning Code to permit accessory apartments within single dwellings, by special exception permit. Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - Commissioners Prew, Pel 1 i sh, Sl etten, Whitcomb, Fischer, Hej ny, Ki shel , Howard Nays - Commissioner Axdahl MEMORANDUM Foam TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Si deyard Setbacks in Res i de Estate Districts DATE: March 10, 1982 }. INTRODUCTION Re uest Councilman Bastian has requested that staff consider side yard setbacks in areas z increasing the requiredzoned • qodR -E, Residence Estate District.ct. Reasons for the Change On February 18, 1982, Mr. Richard M. Hagstrom presented the Ci t Council 'Y with a Certificate of Survey indicating that the house he recently purchased wasabuttinghissoutherly1 - y p9yoflinene. This was contrary to his belief uponpurchasingtheproperty (see enclosed map). . The problem developededPPp when a newhomewasbuiltontheadjacentlottothesouthonly14.5 feet from his ownhome. Mr . Hagstrom felt that his privacy was in jeopardy because of the smai 1 separation between the dwellings. Under the proposed ordinance, there would be a minimum of thirty feet betweenthesehomes,Y n Objectives of the Amendment 1. To establish side yard setbacks for R -E lots, which are more in po irort' ontotheirlsize,p 2. To provide additional space between adjacent dwellings for privacy and fPy ro a more balanced appearance of the house on a large lot, CONCLUSION Issues The main issues are aesthetics and privacy. From an appearance standpoint, a dwelling on a large R -E lot, built five feetfromasidelotlinewouldappeartobecrowdingtheadjacentparcel. I ncreas- i ng the side yard setbacks proportionately for each R -E lot size categ wouldhelptoprovidemoreofabalanced g y P ced appearance. The increased setback would also provide added privacy for neighbor. Staff proposes increase the minimum side yard setback requirements as follows: Zoning Category Minimum Lot Side 1Farrd Setback Fron.ta a Required Pro os6d R -E 20)100 feet 10 feet R -E 30)120 feet 15 feet R- E 140 feet 20 feet Issues - continued By increasing the side yard setback requirements as 1 i'sted there wstillbeatleast would as 80 feet, 90 feet and 100 feet respectively , of buildablelotwidthavailable . Staff feelsels that i f the setbacks were increased anyfurther, it may restrict a home builder too much and force him to constructthehomeinthemiddleoftheparcelDependinguponthetopography1andandproximity g p of the p y to adjacent development, such a requirement may be toolimiting. Recommendation Approval of the enclosed ordinance. 2 REFERENCE INFORMATION Existing Code 1. Section 919.050 of the Zoning Co.de provides the following R -E District s.Standard a. Minimum Lot Area. The minimum lot area shall be determined bytheCityCouncilatthetimeofrezoning, but shall be limited to 20,000, 30,000, or 40,000 square feet. The Council shall base their decision on the character of developed lots within an existingsting nei- ghborhood or on the desired character of lots in an undeveloped area. Minimum lot area requirements shall be designated on the Zoning map in each R -E District's title, e.g. R -E (30), standing for a minimum lot area of 30,000 square feet. Once established, any request to change a district's minimum lot area requirement shall be processed as a request for rezoning. b. Minimum Lot Width at the Building Setback Line. R -E (20) - 100 feet R- E (30) - 120 feet R- E (40) - 140 feet C. Minimum Setbacks. As required for R -1 , Residence District (singledwelling). d. Maximum Building Height. ""As required for R -1 , Residence District single dwelling). e. Legally buildable lots before the rezoning to an R -E zone shall be considered buildable after rezoning to an R -E zone. 2. The side , yard setback in an R -1 zone is five feet. Procedure 1. Planning Commission recommendation 2. Council heari n.g and first reading 3. Council adoption on second reading Enclosures : 1. Proposed Ordinance 2. Certificate of Survey 3- ORDINANCE N0 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING SETBACKS IN R -E DISTRICTS THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS; Section 1. Section 91.9.050 (3) is hereby amended as follows: 919.050 (3) Mini - mum setbacks. a. Within R -E Districts, the following minimum buildingsetbacksfordwellings, accessory buildings and drive- ways shall apply: Side Yard Setback R -E (20) 10 feet R -E (30) 15 feet R -E (40) 20 feet b. All other setbacks shall be as required for R -1, Residence District (Single Dwelling). Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this day of , 19 Attest: Clerk Mayor Ayes - == Nays - S 1 t O 1 M 0 j . /Farr : a.il .:/.M.ft"Aj . or. S - y, lbd 1' t N L;; H Q H x w Dowd- ` v L..1 I . • /O Wide prival walkwaj east /nenf : 4, ,ee 0461 r4ofte ppool ;., ,t•, r — _ _ 6.69 • • - _ r . s se.. + S `•T `- ww /77.se ww I• . 1 0• /• dr r. . ... • • w .. •wood wwr w,... .rr w ... •. w . • . •• ... - win .. w ...w •.. w w.••• •.r ..r.r.. r r wow -.. - • w.•r .+ . • 1 Loa AfDoo Apt 4v to Me o lo s« ..i mi 4.14040 r. -t a I ArearS /' s 3` 890 R1 -- ---- -- y f ra.vT ...__.._.._. • 1 ' 4 2, 2 4 9 59. F t .± no I a I I C % • \4 Wes A yse • c ;p !errs- ^ t J •- - 0.1 & ` q J b C6 j „ I '• •, . r << >, '° ACTUAL LOT LINE `° 14 r a f A Cvr. Sgc /`, T2VW. r rP82W .... S S I / v n! c a,r `,,o" "w A Sa9y8!S ~ J lop ! %np/Itr het / 1 V' L it Deaf V; I i t /k • IAt A 1 I f SW Woo w4 Set' 9 '1 c Mt r / nn ri.w •.. ws .. .-..ww t No f IVa /d usi1. . y 1 9 ' ; '' - f 1_u! Ar 2 •• r _ +LOV0,4A s S ' / ant / d tAc 1 s 1 /;n• •! N I •s ` . ` 0 "`1'' " `'`." '" •°.°° ... .. - PRESUMED LOT LINE UPON PU4 . f,v ,,, , , , . y,oi0 N . 4,° / •• CAS E t«t re nte Ams - _• - — 8 v t P /",. rllAj ojzw J in loco :.ew Lam' ti _ 5 inlat, /o .0 t t t.t3, w• t •- s S ` . t Sotcf h btic of f rau as on Sec - hsle va3 'A4P • f Srl[. /.i+ias•S • e/ lO/ O S \ 1 1 • NAip"y18 'STU ccru pic.1 ar.! Sho•,„l JJO.V wtsf D. -coat oI F corner i .•• •y .A /•• T I ... • a by )V;charJM. N• .sfroM • ' /or' cv^r ' a 9T 2t; 6 t. m 1 s • "STRE-ET L• e. y A* he " I I , J. /,' Cs 74, (.Gr tvett e I /•ce T : . o , f ' 1 O DfhVT'E3 iRON RIPE M7NtE1fT MARrcED rn •r cfr or ch e/3. • , •1 11IIrTT1 A PLASTIC C+ INSCRIBED A.t,.s CL-1- do 54C s e 'Jy w 9232 t1Nt.ESs OrME R Wtsf 3"0vm f D13TAW..ES S"O*W T FEET ( 10 30 M) ARE EXACT EXTRINSIC VALUE 3 ti , N BOUNDARY NOFE • The //ne o/ /ff.'s f'r.+el was Jurveyac accard,' 9 to Me recd..-/ fe al cYeser•.prdnd r / JO 94 Sin fd j :nce pos As JnaT1 acst./ ad M / lioS V • Y n raIy s1 C bJ r , 4', c h a / Al , W.r9.s , o-o . rAacetor,nd /t i .sue/ -,.c+ •r`rf inc I 10nd dS occ4. .roc's own ro r»e by Mr: e. toe , /iv-n N 3 J iR-00,sy 1 cM. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 5 a WV cer s.it, r2YN, B RICHARD M. HAGANSUBMITTEDYRICA r MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community DevelopmentSUBJECT: Code AmendAmendment: Definition of FamilyAPPLICANT: Department of Community DevelopmentDATE: January 21, 1982 p t Reque I. To amend the definition of "family" to l i -mi t the number of nonrel ated members. 2. To establish definitions for rooming and boarding9Ong houses. Reasons for Chi, n2ee A Councilman and at least one Planning -Commiss have noted a concern bresidentswithanincreaseinnonrelatedresidentsinsingle-dwellings. y Time Ma orts aazinereports national trend involving unrelated buyers whotobeatthehighcostsofhomeovrnery double upship. This sharing may be done by singles,,escouples, or senior citizens. Houses in some part 9 ' eci fi cal 1 b p t of the country are beingspecificallyy , builtt for these situations, with identically sizedatoppositeendsofthehouse. zed master bedrooms e. Objectives of the Amendment I. To preserve the quiet, fami - oriented characterer of neighborhoods. 2. To limit the problems of ark n traffiP9 1c, congestion, and overcrowdininneighborhoods. 9 3. To allow a reasonable number of nonrel ated individuals -housekeeping unit, di vi dual s to liveve as a si e 4. To allow a reasonable number of nonrel ated i •individuals to reside as roomerswithafamiofrelatedpersons. CONCLUSION Analysis To l imi t the number of nonrel ated persons ermi tt •l e dwellingin p ed to reside together i n asin9gzonengdistrict, two issues should be addressed: a. The number of nonrel ated persons that should • ether be permuted to residetogetherassoleoccupantsofasinglehousekeepingunitP9 . b. The number of nonrel ated individuals that should be permitted to residedeasroomerswithafamiofrelatedindividuals, C. A related issue - the number of unrelatedated ndi v dual s necessary for status asroomingorboardinghouse, should also b e addressed a Nonrel ated Persons as Sole Occupants of a •Dwe11 i ng Unit When nonrelated individuals are the sole occu .pants of a dwel 1 n un t, a limitt offivepersonsshouldbeestablished, Th ' g . s policy would be ciconsistent with nineoftwenty -one metropoiitan communities surveyed (attached) the uniform buildingofamily (Reference Information - OtheraveragesizeofaMaplewoodewo Q Agencies) , and thepodfare1yplustwononrelatedroomersa 'below. s discussed Related Households and Nonrel ated Roomers All households of related persons to "take i n" a re , no matter how large, should be permittedreasonablenumberofnonrelatedroomers. Li `to two would be consistent with the miting the number of nine of twenty -one surveyedmetropolitanareacom. unities (attachment f yandMaplewoodsdefinitionoroominghouse, as defined in the Rental Housing r ng Maintenance Code. Household of Two Related Persons and Nonrel ated Roomers Limiting two related : to two roomers would be unfair if five unrelatedindividualsweretobepermittedasasingle •a household housekeeping unit. For consistentoftworelatedpersonsshouldbeermit " y ' nonrei ated roomers , p ted to take n u p to three Definition of Rooming and Boarding House The Rental Housing Maintenance Code classifies 'es a residence as a roomi ng houseifaroomorroomsarerentedtothreeormorepersonsunrelatedtotheowner/operator. The zoning code presently oes not •y define rooming or boardingrictthemtoMultipleResidenceandBusiness-Commercial ghouse, but does rest zoning districts, To avoid any Possible code ninterretati person or two related interpretation wishing problems, particularl for the sin i ePatedpersonhouseholdwito "take g i n g e n roomers , zoningcodedefinitionsofroomgandboardinghouseshouldbeestablishedconsistentwiththeproposeddefinitionoffamily. SecYSecond, the Rental Housing MaintenanceCodedefinitionofroominghouseshouldbereplacedbazoningcodedefinition, p Y reference to the Recommendation I. Approval of the enclosed Zoni no Ordinance Amendment redefi ni na fami andaddingdefinitionsforroominandboardingfourvotesfor g g houses. at leastaaproval.} II. Approval of the enclosed Rental Housing Maintenance Code Amendment revisingthedefinitionofroominghousetocorrespondtothezoningcodedefinition.Requires at least a simple majority.) 2 - REFERENCE INFORMATION Existing Ordinance l . Section 916.010 (7) of City Code defines "family" as, "An number of persons living and cooking y g together as a singlea housekeeping unit. 2. Section 214.040 (4) (x) of the Rental Housing Maintenance Code defines Rooming House" to mean any residence building, or an art thereof, con- tai ni ng one or more rooming units, in which space is rented by the owner or operator to three or more persons who are not husband or wife, son or daughter, mother or father,sister or brother of the owner or operator. Other Agencies 1 . State of Minnesota - Uniform Building Code Section 407,07 defines Family" as: an individual or two or more persons related by blood or marriage or a group of not more than five persons (excluding servants) who need not be related by blood or marriage living together in a dwellingunit." 2. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Section 22-1.1 of the 1981 Life Safety Code stipulates that: one- and two - family dwellings include buildings containing not more than two dwelling units in which each living unit is occupied bymembersofasinglefamilywithnomorethanthreeoutsiders, if any,accommodated in rented rooms." The code does not define "family" or "outsider." Survey of Other Communities Nine of twenty -one communi t'i es surveyed, or 43%, limit the number of nonrel ated persons who can l i v e in a single dwelling to five. Blaine and Golden Valley,aside from Maplewood, have no limit. (See enclosed survey.) Among the surveyed communities, 43% also limit a famil roomers to two roomers. In twocommunities, Burnsville and Cottage Grove, a famil withthenumberofpermittednonrelatedindividuals, y orers can not exceed Group Homes State law exempts a state licensed group home or foster h 'fearer mentally retarded or physically home servicing six or p y cally handicapped persons from local regulationinsingle - dwelling zones. Leal The following evaluation of past court decisions in Zoni n 9 and Planni LawReportrecthatatleasttwounrelatedpersonsbeallowedtoresidetogether (Vol. 1, No. l., pp. 4 -5): 3 - A r- The case for requiring a minimum of two unrelatednrelaced persons to be allowedtoresideinasinglefamilyzoneseemsastrongpersons, as gone., n that: (1 } two un-related P opposed to a group of unrelated ersons do notsomuchofathreatordisturbP pose ance to the prevailinging "family-" characteristicsofaneighborhood; (2) the claims of a need -of companionship- or housekeepingassistancearegreaterforasingleeindividu2 •and (3) reater rights 9 individual, implicated f elderl9ghtsofdomesticprivacyare 1 i Gated i n the -Of two ndivlduals than in th p e relationshipatofagroup, cf. . Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405J.S. 432 (1972). Pending decisional law on the uest1 ma be b q on of whether even two unrelated personsYbarredfromresidingtogetherinasingleefami1z • 1 e f g Y one, the guidelinesnesforrestrictivesinglefamilzoning, for purposes of federal consti tuti llaw, appear to be as follows: ona groups of three or more unrelated individuals,may be barred from residing in single family districts,t g Y but groups ofindividualsrelatededby "blood, adoption, or marriage" must be allowedtqualification a owed toresidetogetherwithouqfcationastotheirdegreeofkinship. To beemphasized, however, 1 s that the above guidelinesde1 ' p federal constitutional - g nes interpreting for purposes of pass-i ng tional muster, state courts, inter retie statetutions, may still review restrictive . 9 consti - eye. ctive single family zoning with a more critical Procedure 1. HRA: Recommendation 2. Planning Commission: Recommendation 3, City Council: a. First reading and public hearinggb. Second readingng and adoption Enc1 nr,-i,rac 1. Proposed Ordinance 2. Survey 4 - ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 214 OF THE MAPLEWOOD CITY CODE RELATING TO THE DEFINITION OF ROOMING HOUSE THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 . Section 916.040 (4) (X) is hereby amended as follows (languagetobedeletediscrossedoutandproposedlanguageisunderlined) : ReeR3iRg- Hews e - sha }I- feaR- aRy- res}denee- bu +Id4Rg ,- er -aRy- part- thereef; -- EeRta4R4Rg- eRe- er- Fiere- reeffliRg -un4 is , - -+ Eh- spaEe- s- rented -by- the -ewRer er- eperater -te- three -er- mere- perseRe -whe- a re- met- hesband- er -w +fe = - s8R -er daeghter father;- s}ster- er- brether -ef- the- ewRer- er- eperater x. Rooming House As defined in Secton 196.010 (26) of the City Zoning Code. For purposes of this or i nance, there shall e no i s ncti on made between rooming and boarding house Section 2.- This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Council this day of 9 1982. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 916 OF THEM APLE1lOOD CITY COPE RELATINGTOTHEDEFINITIONOFFAMILY, ROOMING HOUSE AND BOARDINGNG HOUSE THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEW04D DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section l . Section 916.010 is hereby am •y ended to revs se the fol l owi n 1 an ua elanguagetobedeletedicrossedggout, language to be- added is underlined ) • 946 - - 74- Fay }lys-- Apy- fiwF.Rber-ef- e •p - saps- }ng- bpd- Eeek4 R9 te get her-as -a-s4R }e - -beb sekeep4Rg -wn4t 916.010 (7). h Fami1 : A family ausekeepi ng unit: is one of the fol l owi n 1 i vi ng togethe as a sin 1 e a . An individual or a group of persons not t 'o exceed five, who are not relatedbybloods ' marriage foster chi dren, or ado p ti on or b. Two persons related by blood ma • no more t a marriage faster children, or adoption andntreeunreatepersons, or C . Three or more persons related b blood,_ marriage, foster children, oradoptionannotmorethanunreatepersons, Section 2, Section 916.010 is hereby amended to add the following language: 916.010 (24) Boarding House: A rooming g house n which meals are provided. 916.010 (25) Rooming House: An single •Any ngla housekeeping unit in which space is rented,meals, to persons unrelated to the resident P tad,lass manager or property owner, inexcessofthedefinitionoffamly,as defined in Section 916.010 (7). Secti 3. This ordinance shall •1 take effect and be in force from and aftandpublication, f after passage Passed by the Maplewood City Council this day of 1982. ATTACHMENT ONE SURVEY OF CITIES CLOSEST TO MAPLEWOOD IN POPULATIONa All cities surveyed allowed any number of related family members. MAXIMUM NUMBER, OF MAXIMUM NUMBERCNONRELATEDRESIDENTSQFROOMERSa) Maplewood No l i m i t - Coon Rapids 6 2 Roseville 4 2 Burnsville 4 b Plymouth 5 2 Brooklyn Center 5 2 rooms may be rented) Fridley 5 _ Blaine No limit South St. Paul 5 5 Eagen 5 _ Maple Grove 4 1 or 2 dependingependng on the zoning district Columbia Heights 3 or unlimited 2 z. if same sex Cottage Grove 4 (b) West St. Paul 4 2 Shoreview 5 (one room may be rented) Crystal 3 1 New Brighton 3 2 New Hope 5 1 Golden Valley No limit 2 White Bear Lake 5 2 Apple Valley. S MEDIAN NUMBER 5 a) Owner Occupied Dwelling b) A family with roomers cannot exceed the allowable number of nonrelated residents. i' is s MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Communit .DevelY o pmentSUBJECT: Definition of Family _ DATE: March 17 , 1982 Councilmember Maida asked staff to survey he • Maplewood. y cities adjacent to CITY MAXIMUM NUMBER OF MAXIMUM NUMBERNON - RELATED RESIDENTS OF ROOMERS North St. Paul 2 1 Oakdale 5 2 Wood bury 5 8 - requires special Newport 5 permit 8 requires special St. Paul permit4 (a) Roseville 4 2 White Bear Lake 5 2 Vadnai s Heights No limit No limit Little Canada Information not available a) A family with roomers cannot exceed the allowable number ofnon - related residents. B, Code Amendment - Definition of Family Secretary Olsonon said this proposal is to amend the definition of "family"P as outlined in the Maplewood Code and also establish definitions for rooming and boarding houses. The HRA review was summarized for the Commission. Commissioneroner Ki shel moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Zoningng Ordinance amendment redefining family and adding definitions for rooming and boarding houses. Co mmissi oner Prew seconded Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl , Prew, Pellish Sletten, Whitcomb, Fischer, Hejny, Ki shel , Howard Commissioner Pel l i sh moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of Housing Maintenance Code amendment revisingtheRental the definition of rooming Pcorrehouseto and to the Zoning Code definition (Section 214) Commissioner Prew seconded Ayes Commissioners Axdahl , Prew,Y - h S1 etten Whitcomb, Fischer, Hey, ny, Ki s hel , HowardPellis , 3 Ic F j MEMORANDUM / TO:City Manager FROM:Tom Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT:Final Plat =- LOCATION:Cope Avenue and Kennard Street - APPLICANT:Wayne J. Herr OWNER:JLK Imperial Builders PROJECT:Maple Park Shores DATE:March 25, 1982 Request Approval of a final plat for a twenty unit townhouse development (four buildings), n__.L It _L? ___ 3- 15 -81: Council approved the , prel imi nary plat for Maplee Park Shores subjectpJecttotheconditionthatthefinalplatnotbeapproveduntil: 1. The City Attorney has approved the bylaws and rules of the ro osed home-owner's association p ptoassurethatallcommonareaswillbemaintained. 2. A signed developers agreement for the construction of u t i l i t i e s through thesiteandenlargementofthe 9 9 e exi sti ng pandi ng facilityity i s submitted and approved by the Director of Public Works. 3. An easement over Outl of A shall be dedicated to the City for drainagee andy9utilitypurposesonthefinalplat. Analysis The following is in response to the conditions of final platting: 1. The City Attorney has approved the bylaws and rules of the hom eowners association.. 2. The developers agreement has been signed b the applicanticant and willlypp be signedbytheDirectorofPublicWorksuponapprovalofthefinalP1at. 3. The blanket easement over Outl of A. for drainage and uti 1 i ti e-s has been provi ded, however, the City of St. Paul also requiresres that a specificfq i pec> >c utility easement over all water lines be dedicated. Recommendation Approval of the final plat for Maple Park Shores, subject to the followingcondition: The developer shall dedicate a thirty foot wide utility easement over all water lines. This easement shall be subject to approva- by the Director of Public Works. - Enclosued: 1. Location Map 2. Plat Map 11 K- - mow t ". i Y KOHL WAN t h ROIL ..C. I IF LOCATION MAP H MAPLE PARK SHORES E G ROGER'S GARDEN LOTS mow-- — '' - --•.+ ---AVE NUE --_ • 1 a4maw left \ M a": I uw f 1 IWuJIR •• t t 1 4 s r I LFY CA CL 0 no 2 f Iw 1ItYItom t t t ! t• t t 1 SMITH I AND j Ov W " TA`fLOWS ' ADDITION saw -00-ftow ww - L ARK AVENUE. TO i I NORTH t I IST ( RQU:. rw w "N' Irq•1• •1•Y Ate• •• AI M•/ M ice• 1•. anrw « • MIN r+ s 90-A" nr••.W w I mow 111mft lime r• ""m Isow"o .... w --^ « • ,. PART OF SWI/4 . SE V4 SEC. 10, T 29 N., R 22 W, RAMSEY CO., MINN.mow • r «w,r • wnn NOW IAN IMIMWVM i t SITE PLAN 4 N OOMr"'m"P AQ WO March 23, 1982 Mapl.ewood Council Members 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewo Minnesota Members of the Board I am requesting that the law governing the closing c f off- sale liquor stores on Memorial Day be placed on the agenda for the attention of the board members discussion. I find it very difficult tc compete with liquor stores within a one -mile radius whose laws govern i.ng hours and Pdaysopen are different than mine. Any time someone goes to another store because you are not open, that is a sale you have lost and cannot be made up, The same can be said of a day's receipts. For whatever reason when a store is closed for a day, those sales 'for that day are gone; particularly if there are other stores in the area who are open, I don't think there is anyone unaware of the difficult economic position most retailers are in. It is a double burden to be unable to at least have the same opportuni-ty as others around you to compete for business, I can think of no positive reason why off-sale liquor stores are, by law, closed in Maplewood on Memorial Day I am requestingtinYqg that serious consideration be given to changing this law. Thank you for your kind attention, Sincerely, Gust R. Sarrack, tre den t Sarrack' s Interna '' ona. wines & Spirits MEMORANDUM T FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager Assistant City Engineer March . 25 , 1982 Maplewood Drive T. H. 61 -- Frontage Road PROJECT NO. 80 -10 Enclosed herewith is the Engineering Feasibility Report for the above referenced project for your consideration. We request that the Maplewood City Council establish a date for public hearing on May 6, 1982 during their regular meeting N, RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the City' Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of the frontage road east of T.H. 61 by construction of street, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, watermai n and appurtenances , and WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvements hwerei n described: NOW, THEREFORE, 'BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: I. The report of the City Engineer advising this Council that the proposed improvement on Maplewood Drive (T.H. 61 Eas to Frontage Road) by construction of street, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, waterma i n and appurtenances is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improve- ment according to M. S . A. Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $674,800.00. 3. A public hearing w i l l be held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1380 Frost Avenue on Thursday, the 6th day of May, 1982, at 7:00 p.m. to consider said improve- ment. The City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by 1 aw. r mr „ March 23, 1982 STAFF REPORT _ To: City Manager Barry Evans From: Chief of Police R. W. Schaller Subject: Liqu License Application of Thomas Given dba Prom Catering at Keller Clubhouse for Golf Season 1982 I n. the past, it has been usual practi fo them to apply during the year in that the licensee has not operated the last couple of winters at that location. This practice was acceptable as long as we had available on -sale liquor licenses; however, as you are aware, this situation no longer exists so they have been sent the attached notice. There appears to be nothing on the f i 1 e at this time to prevent the City Counci from authorizing the issuance of this license for 1982. f RWS : j s cc Liquor File City Clerk City Manager Deputy Chief Hagen jjj 0 D_ 138( lO W )S'1' .1\ :dx 1 ' E. NL\ 1 1.I:1'OO1). . 55109 I I]PAR` 4XIENT OF PUBLIC SAFI'TY OFFICE OF CHIEF OF POLICE March 23, 1982 Mr. Thomas W. Given c Keller Clubhouse 2161 Maplewood Drive Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Given: After an inquiry several weeks ago, we received application for a renewal of the on -sale liquor license at your leased premises. In the P ast this practice of "hate" submission of your application has been acceptable; howeveratthepresenttime, all on-sale licenses authori zed b law in Maplewood are committed, d y e , an i f, the licensecense for Keller 'Clubhouse1ubhouse i s not submitted byNovember15th, it will become an eligible license for ubl i c applicationication b yanybodyforanylocation , P PP I trust you readily see the need to promptly submit your application in the future. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call upon me. Very truly yours, R, Schaller, Chief of Police Maplewood Police Department RWS:js cc Liquor File City Clerk City Manager Deputy Chief Hagen Director of Arenas Anthony Crea OITY OF MAPLEWOOD APPLICATION FOR INTO <l'ICATING LIQUOR LICENSE , THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN DUPLICATE. Whoever shall knowingly and wilfully falsify the answers to the following questionnaire shall be deemed guilty of perjury and shall he punished accordingly. In answering the following questions "APPLICANTS" shall be governed as follows: For a Cor- poration one officer shall execute this application for all officers, directors and stockholders. For a part- nership one of the "APPLICANTS" shall execute this application for all members of the partnership. EVERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED _ Thomas W. Given Manag '1. I, as -- Individual owner, officer or partner) for and in behalf of Keller Golf Course Clubhouse _ hereby apply* for an ' Sale Intoxicating Liquor License to be located at _ rPller Clubhouse 4'166 Maplewood Drive $ IZ Minnesota 55109 in the City of Give address and legal description) Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No. 95 of Maplewood. 2. Give applicants' date of birth: Thomas W. Given .23rd flay 1 Day) (Month) (Year) 3. The residence for each of the applicants named herein for the past five years is as follows: 1975 215 Woodlawn A St. Paul Minnesota 1976 164 Juno Street 1477 Spring 19.78 598 S. Marwick Street Spring 78 - '?9 215 Woodlawn March 80 to present 6549 Buckingham Road, Woodbury Minnesota 4. Is the applicant a citizen of the United States? Yes If naturalized state date and place of naturalizatio If a corporation or partnership, state citizenship including naturalization of each officer or partner. 5. The person who executes this application shall give wife's or husband's full name and address.______ I'lrs. Mary Ann Given 6549 Buckingham Road, Woodbury Minn 6. What occupations have applicant and associates in this application followed for the past five years? Applicant has wo as Cate Manager, Prom Catering Co St. Paul Minn 15. State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, during that past five years were ever convicted of any Liquor Law violations or any crime in this state, or any other state, or under Federal Laws, and if so, give date and ' d etails_ Never a M. Is applicant, or any of his associates in this application, a member of the governing body of the municipality in which this license is to be issued? _ _ N o . If so, in what capacity? 17. State whether any person other than applicants has any right, title or interest in the furniture, fixtures, or equipment in the premises for which license is applied, and if so, give names and details All above fixtures and equipment are owned by the County and leased to applicant for duration of the contract. 18. Have applicants any interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly, in any other liquor establishment in the State of Minnesota? _ NO__.. Give name and address of such establishment - 19. Furnish the names and addresses of at least three business references, including one bank refer - enc Mr. Amos Pbxt Ex V Pres St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce To Squ Bldg Roger Foussard Hospital Linen Supply Services Inc 740 E Seventh St. Paul 5510E 20. Do you possess a retail dealer's identification card issued by the Liquor Control Commissioner which will expire December 31st of this year? Give number of sam Yes applied for 21. Does applicant intend to sell intoxicating liquor to other tharl the consumer? No 22. State whether applicant intends to possess, operate or permit the possession or operation of, on the licensed premises or in any room adjoining the licensed premises, any slot machine, dice, gam- bling device and apparatus, or permit any gambling therein No 23. Are the premises now occupied, or to be occupied, by the applicant entirely separate and exclusive from any other business establishment? Yes . + _ 24. State trade name to be used Keller Clubho Concessions 25. State name of person that will operate store _71 omas W. Given 12 PO 26. Give Federal Retail Liquor Dealer's Tax Stamp Number 27. If off sale license is being applied lbr, do you intend to deliver liquor by vehicle? . If so, state number of motor vehicle permits issued by Liquor Control Commissioner for eurrent,.year 28. If you are building a new building for the purposes for which this application is being made, please submit plans and specifications with this application. 29. Financing of the construction of this building will be as follows: 30. Furnish a persobal financial statement with this .application. If a partnership, furnish financial state- ment of each partner. 31. Give description of type of operation if this is an on -sale license application (i.e. whether cock - tail lounge, nite club, restaurant, etc., specifying; capacity by number of customers and any other License will be used to accomodate food & beverage diesttes of the pertinent data) . — Colfing public using Keller faciltiis during legal operating hours. Golf Awards Dinners, private dinner functions similar to those handled in toast years will also be welrow Public availability of the facilities during legal operating house will also be welocmed. t 32. What previous experience have you had in the operation of the type of business described in the a ve I have worked for my Fath since age 14 years as busboy, answer to I Tin er , and currently ca er man er.concessionaire at el r 0 years, oo , i8 ag Y am involved with food buying and supervision for my Father at his plac of business end at Keller. I am paid a .,salary for my food work and do nohave 'KhO compensation or remuneration from bwverages served at th same location. 33. Applicant, and his associates in this application, will strictlytomply with all the laws of the State of Minnesota governing the taxation and the sale of intoxicating liquor; rules and regulations promulgated by the Liquor Control Commissioner; and all ordinances of the municipality; and I hereby certify that I have read the foregoing questions and that the answers to said questions are true of my own knowledge. Thomas W. Given Signature of Applicant) Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of ______, 19.__._. THIS APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED WITH YOUR CHECK FOR THE FIRST LICENSE. PERIOD.