Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982 02-04 City Council Packet.b� 67 ) AGENDA Maplewood City Council 7:00 P.M., Thursday, February 4, 1.982 Municipal Administration Building Meeting 82 -3 (A) CALL TO ORDER (B) ROLL CALL (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes 82 -2 (January 21) (D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA (E) CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion on these items. If discussion is de- sired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Accounts Payable 2. Keller Parkway Bridge 3. English Street: Street and Utility Improvements 4. Budget Transfer: Police (F) PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Preliminary Plat: Gervais Overlook (7:00) (G) AWARD OF BIDS - None (H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Nature Center Ordinance (Second Reading) 2. PAC - Commercial & Industrial 3. Code Amendment: Plan Review Authority (Second Reading) 4, Code Amendment: Minimum Floor Area (Second Reading) (I) VISITOR PRESENTATION (J) NEW BUSINESS 11 Special Exception: Carlton Street 2, Hillwood Drive - Dorland Road: Street and Utility Improvements.- (Set Assessment Hearing) 3, Park Contract with Gethsemane (K} COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. (L) ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS (M) ADJOURNMENT , 1 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Thursday, January 21, 1982 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 82 -2 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers and was called to order at 7:02 P.M. by Mayor Greavu, B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present MaryLee Maida, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes 81 -30 (December 17, 1981) Councilmember Juker moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 81 -30 (December 17, 1981) as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 2. Minutes No. 82 -1 (January 7, 1982) Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the Minutes of Meetin g No. 82 -1 (Januar y 7 , 1982) as corrected: Page 14 - Item K -6 "as outlined in the approved PUD" Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. D. APPROVAL OF AGE Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended: I. Committee 2. Quad Ordinance 3. Bullets 4. Snow Plowing 5. 25.th Anniversary 6. Cable TV 70 Water Department 8. Pipeline Ordinance 9. Adolphus Sewer 1 O'. AF S CME Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGEN 1 - 1/21 6 Councilmember Anderson moved,. seconded by Councilmember Bastian, Ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda as recommended 1. Accounts Payable Approved the Accounts (Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses, Check No. 06720 through Check No. 06719 - $81,298.32; Check No. 012217 through Check No. 12358 - $355,825.62: Part II - Payroll, Check No. 02626 through Check No. 02751 - $54,330.91) in the amount of $491,454.85. 2. Fire Department Agreement Approved the 1982 Fire Department Agreements for the three Maplewood Departments. 3. Planning Commission Annual.Report Accepted the 1981 Planning Commission Annual Report, 4. Community Design Review Board Annual Report Accepted the 1981 Community Design Review Board Annual Report, F. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Industrial Revenue Notes: Health Resources - 7 :00 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Health Resources for two revenue notes 1) $3,970,000 - construction and equipping a medical office building at the NE corner of Beam Avenue and Hazelwood Avenue 2) $7,153,000 acquisition-of land and construction and equipping of an ambulatory care center, including a surgery center, emergency center and physical medicine at the NE,corner of Beam Avenue and Hazelwood Avenue. The Clerk stated the hearing notices were in order and noted the dates of publication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. C. Mr. John Riley, Senior Vice President for Health Resources, 2696 Hazelwood Avenue, spoke on behalf of the proposal. d. Mrs. Mary Ippel, Briggs and Morgan, explained the procedures for this proposal. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: ($7,153,000 Industrial Revenue Note) 82 -1 -12 RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT 2 - 1/21 AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF All APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF SAID PROJECT TO THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH SAID PROJECT WHEREAS , (a) The purpose of Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, known as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (the "Act ") as found and determined by the , legislature is to promote the welfare of the state by the active attraction and encouragement and development of economi- cally sound industry and commerce to prevent so far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; (b) Factors necessitating the active promotion and development of economically sound industry and corrunerce are the increasing concentration of population in the metropolitan areas and the rapidly rising increase in the amount and cost of governmental services required to meet the needs of the increased population and the need for development of land use which will provide an adequate tax base to finance these increased costs and access to employment opportunities for such population; (c) The City Council of the City of Maplewood ("the City ") has received from Health Resource Center, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the "Company ") a proposal that the City assist in financing a Project hereinafter described, through the issuance of a Revenue Bond or Bonds or a Revenue Note or Notes hereinafter referred to in this resolution as "Revenue Bonds" pursuant to the Act* (d) The City desires to facilitate the selec tive development of the community, retain and improve the tax base and help to provide the range of services and employment opportunities required by the population; and the Project will assist the City in achieving those objectives. The Project will help to increase assessed valuation of the City and help maintain a positive relationship between assessed valuation and debt and enhance the image and reputation of the community; (e) Company is currently engaged in the business of health care services. The Project to be financed by the Revenue Bonds is an ambulat`o'ry care facility to be located in the City and consists of the acquisition of land and the construction of buildings and improvements thereon and the installation of equipment therein, and will result in the en- ployment of 60 additional persons to work within the new facilities; - 3 - 1/21 (f) The City has been advised by representa- tives of Company that conventional, cormnercial financing tO pay the capital cost of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic ,feasibility of operating the Project would be significantly reduced, but Company has also advised this Council that with the aid of municipal financing, and its resulting low bor- rowing cost, the Project is economically more feasible; (g) Pursuant to a resolution of the City Council adopted on January 17, 1982, a public hearing on the Project was held on January 21, 1982, after notice was published, and materials made available for public inspection at the City Hall, all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b at which public hearing all those appearing who so desired to speak were heard; (h) No public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly benefit financially from the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Council hereby gives preliminary approval to the proposal of Company that the City undertake the Project pursuant to the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes) , consisting of the acqui- sition, construction and equipping of facilities within the City pursuant to Company's specifications suitable for the operations described above and to a revenue agreement between the City and Company upon such terms and conditions with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary, so as to , produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal of and interest on the Revenue Bonds in the total principal amount of approximately $7,153,000 to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project; and said agreement may also provide for the entire interest of Company therein to be mortgaged to the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds; and the City hereby undertakes preliminarily to issue its Revenue Bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions; 29 On the basis of information available to this Council it appears, and the Council hereby finds, that the Project constitutes properties, real and personal, used or useful in connection with one or more revenue producing enterprises engaged in any business within the meaning of Subdivision lc of Section 474.02 of the Act; that the Project furthers the purposes stated in Section 474901, Minnesota Statutes; that the availability of the financing under the Act and willingness of the City to furnish such financing will be a substantial inducement to Company to undertake the Project, and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the development of economically sound industry and commerce, to assist in the prevention of the emergence of blighted and - 4 - 1/21 marginal land, to help prevent chronic unemployment, to help the City retain and unprove the tax base and to provide the range of service and employment opportunities required by the population, to help prevent the movement of talented and educated persons out of the state and to areas within the State where their services may not be as effectively used, to promote more intensive development and use of land within the City and eventually to increase the tax base of the community; 3. The Project is the City subject to the missioner of Securities approval by this Counci Revenue Bonds as to the the Project; hereby given preliminary approval by approval of the Project by the Com- and Real Estate, and subject to final 1, Company, and the purchaser of the ultimate details of the financing of 4. In accordance with Subdivision 7a of Section 474.01 Minnesota Statutes, the Mayor of the City is hereby authorized and directed to submit the proposal for the Project to the Commissioner of Securities and Real Estate, requesting her ap- proval, and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide the Commissioner with such preliminary information as she may require S. Company has agreed and i any and all costs incurred by the financing of the Project whether to completion and whether or not will be paid by Company; t is hereby determined that. City in connection with. the or not the Project is carried approved by the Corami s s loner G. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, is authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Project, to consult with the City Attorney, Company and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms and provisions of the Revenue Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary documents and to submit such documents to the Council for final approval; 7. Nothing in this resolution or in the documents pre- pared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or funds of the City except the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall the City be subject to any liability thereon. The holder of the Revenue Bonds shall never have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the outstanding principal on the Revenue Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any' property of the City. The Revenue Bonds shall recite in substance that the Revenue Bonds, including interest thereon, is payable solely from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation; - 5 - 1/21 y 80 In anticipation of the approval by the Commissioner of Securities and Real Estate and the issuance of the Revenue Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Project, , and in order that completion of the Project will not be unduly delayed when approved, Company is hereby authorized to make such expenditures and advances toward payment . P Y of that portion of the costs of the Project to be financed from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds as Company considers necessary, including the use of interim, short - term financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds if and when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the City; 90 If construction of the Project is not started within one year from the date hereof, this resolution shall thereafter have no force and effect and the reliminar P Y approval herein granted is withdrawn. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. i. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: ($3,900,000 Industrial Revenue Note) 82 - 1 - 13 RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF SAID PROJECT TO THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES i OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS TN CONNECTION WITH SAID PROJECT WHEREAS, (a) The purpose of Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, known as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial legislature is to promote the welfare of the state by the active attraction and encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to pre - vent so far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; (b) Factors necessitating the active promotion and development of economically sound industry and commerce are the increasing concentration of population in the metro- politan areas and the rapidly rising increase in the amount and cost of governmental services required to meet the needs of the increased population and the need for de- velopment of land use which will provide an adequate tax base to finance these increased costs and access to employment opportunities for such population; (c) The City Council of the City of Maplewood ( "the City ") has received from Health Resource Center, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minn- esota (the "Company ") a proposal that the City assist in financin g J a Project hereinafter described, through the issuance of a Revenue Bond or Bonds or a Revenue Note or Notes hereinafter referred to in this resolution as "Revenue Bonds" pursuant to the Act; (d) The City desires to facilitate the selective development of the community, Y retain and improve the tax base and help to provide the range of services and employment opportunities required by the population; and the Project will assist the City in achieving those objectives. - 6 - 1/21 The Project will help to increase assessed valuation of the City and help maintain a positive relationship between assessed valuation and debt and enhance the image and reputation of the community; (e) Company is currently engaged in the business of health care services. The Project to be financed by the Revenue Bonds is an ambulatory care facility' be located in the City and consists of the acquisition of land and the construction of buildings and improvements thereon and the installation of equipment therein, and will result in the em- ployment of 60 additional persons to work within- the new facilities; �f) The City has been advised by representa- tives of Company that conventional, cormnercial financing to pay the capital cost of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the Project would be significantly g Y reduced, but Company has also advised this Council that with the . aid of municipal financing, and its resulting low bor- rowing cost, the Project is economically more feasible; (g) Pursuant to a resolution of the City Council adopted on January 17, 1982, a public hearing on the Project was held on January 21, 1982, after notice was published, and materials made available for public inspection at the City Hall, all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b at which public hearing all those appearing who so desired to speak were heard; (h) No public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly enefit fin . n Y financially from the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Council hereby gives preliminary approval to the proposal of Company that the City undertake the Project pursuant to the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes) , consisting of the acqui- sition, construction and equipping of facilities within the City pursuant to Company's specifications suitable for the operations described above and to a revenue agreement between the City and Company upon such terms and conditions with provisions for revision from time to tithe as necessary, to r d so as p o uce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal of and interest on the Revenue Bonds in the total principal amount of approximately $7,153,000 to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project; and said agreement may also provide for the entire interest of Company therein to be mortgaged to the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds; and the City hereby undertakes preliminarily to issue its Revenue Bonds'in accordance with such terms and conditions; 7 - 1/21 .29 on the basis of information available to this Council it appears, and the Council hereby finds, that the Project constitutes properties, real and personal, used or useful in connection with one or more revenue producing enterprises engaged in any business within the meaning of Subdivision lc of Section 474.02 of the Act; that the Project furthers the purposes stated in Section 474.01, Minnesota Statutes; that the availability of the financing under the Act and willingness of the City to furnish such financing will be a substantial inducement to Company to undertake the Project, and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the development of economically sound industry and commerce, to assist in the prevention of the emergence of blighted and marginal land, to help prevent chronic unemployment, to help the City retain and improve the tax base and to provide the range of service and employment opportunities required by the population, to help prevent the movement of talented and educated persons out of the state and to areas within the State Where their services may not be as effectively used, to promote more intensive development and use of land within the City and eventually to increase the tax base of the community; 3. The Project is the City subject to the miss loner of Securities approval by this Counci Revenue Bonds as to the the Project; hereby given preliminary approval by approval of the Project by the Com- and Real Estate, and subject to final 1, Company, and the purchaser of the ultimate details of the financing of 4. In accordance with Subdivision 7a of Section 474.01 Minnesota Statutes, the Mayor of the City is hereby authorized and directed to subinit the proposal for the Project to the Commissioner of Securities and Real Estate, requesting her ap- proval, and other officers, � employees and agents of, the City are hereby authorized to provide the Commissioner with such preliminary information as she may require; 5. Company has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project whether or not the Project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by the Commissioner will be paid by Company; 6. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, is authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary.documents relating to the Project, to consult with the City Attorney, Company and the. purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms and provisions of the Revenue Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary documents and to submit such documents to the Council for final approval; 7. Nothing in this resolution or in the documents pre- pared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal 'funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien - 8 - 1/21 or encumbrance, legal or equitable, an upon the revenue and proceeds lec P Y Property or funds of the City exce t P ged to the payment thereof, nor shall t P to any liability thereon. The holder of the he City be subject e Revenue Bons shall never have .the r' to compel any exercise of the taxin ght on the Revenue Bonds or th g power l of the City to pay the outstandin r• e interest thereon, or to enforce a men g P znc�pal any property of the City. The Revenue Bonds sh P y t thereof against Bonds, including interest Cher all recite in substance that the Rev eon, is payable solely from the revenue an" enue pledged to the payment thereof* p roceeds' The Revenue Bands shall not constitute the City within the meaning of an a debt of y con stitutional or statutory limitation; 80 In anticipation of the approval and the issuance of t by the Commissioner of Securities and he Revenue Bonds to finance all or a Real Estate and in order that completion of the Project will portion of the Project, not be unduly delayed when a pproved Company is hereby authorized to make , such expenditures and advances toward payment of that portion of the costs of the Pr o�ect to be financed from the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds as Company considers ne term financin cessary, including the use of interim s g, subject to reimbursement from the roc hort- and when delivered but otherwise without liability eels of the Revenue Bonds if y on the part of the Cit y� 9. If construction of the Project ' � ct is not started within one year from the d hereof, this resolution shall thereaf ter have no f ate force and effect and the reli ' approval herein granted is withdrawn. P urinary Seconded by Councilmember Juk er. Ayes - all. 2. Liquor License: Esteban's Maplewood p ewood Mall - 7 p,M a. Mayor Greavu convened the meetin for of David Paul Schmitt for on g a Public hearing regarding the re uest On Sale Liquor License to be known as E q located in the Maplewood Mall. The steban's Clerk stated the hearing notice was fo to be in order and noted the dates of u and p blication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. C, Mr. Richard Tourand, representing ste g ban's, spoke on behalf of the request. q • d. Mayor Greavu called for ro onent P P s. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the ublic hearing. aring. g. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: ption: 82 - 1 - 14 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT pursuant to action by the Council of the City Maplewood on January 21, 1982 an On S y of for David Paul Schmi � s, Maplewood Mall. ale Intoxicating Liquor License was a tt dba Esteban approved The Council proceeded in this matter City Ordinances. as outlined under the provisions of the Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all. 9 — 1/21 3. Sign Variance: McKnight Townhomes - 7:30 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request ht Road for g g Q est of McKnight Townhomes, 384 McKnight a sign variance to erect a 32 square foot ground sign with a six square foot extension for a total sign area of 3 g 8 square feet. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was in order and noted the dates of publication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. C. Mr. Don Moe presented the following Community Design Review Board • Y g recommendation: "Board Member Folley moved that the Board recommend approval of the ' PP sign variance for McKnight Townhomes based on the findings that: 1. The proposed sign would meet the spirit and intent of the Sign Code. 2. The proposed sign would be attractive in appearance and would be compatible with the townhome complex. Board Member Lydon seconded. Ayes all." d.Mr...Ray Brandon, 2359 Dorland Lane, representing McKnight Townhomes, spoke on behalf of the proposal. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the sign variance as requested by McKnight ht Town - homes to erect a 32 square foot round sign with a six square foot extension for a total sign area of 38 square feet at the northeast corner of McKnight Road g an Pond Avenue, based on the findings of the staff and Community Design Review Board recommendation. Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - Mayor Greavu Councilm Y , embers Juker and Maida. Nays - Councilmembers Anderson and Bastian. 4, Street Easement Vacation: Lepsche 7 :45 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposed vacation of an easement for a portion of the Seventh Street right of way, lying east of McKnight Road. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was found to be in order and noted the dates of publication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Kishel moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the resolution authorizing staff to quit claim the street easement back to the property owner, on a portion of Seventh Street right-of-way, lying g Y� Y g east of McKnight Road subject to the owner quit claiming to the City a utility and drainage easement over, under, through, and across the area of released street easement. - 10 - 1/21 Approval is recommended on the basis that: 1. The street easement is in excess of the P ublic need 29 Improvement would not be cost - effective for the abutting tong properties . 3. The easement unnecessaril restricts • y cts the development of adjacent land. 4. Improvement would be contrary o the intent ntent of maximizing the buffer between single- dwelling neighborhoods and high density esidential Y developments, 5 Staff take into account the need for a ondin area P g on the applicant's property if and when a request for lot subdivision is made. Commissioner Prew seconded. Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Ellefson, Fischer, Hejny, Howard, Kishel, Pellish, Prew, Sletten, Whitcomb" d. Mrs. Julia Engebretson, daughter of Mrs. Albert Le sch ro ert P e, owner of the adjacent P P y, spoke on behalf of the vacation, but objected to the Planning recommendation for a ponding area. Commission e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. The following ere heard: g . Mr. Jerry Swanson, Chairman of the Building ommittee for Beaver eaver Lake Church. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing, g h. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resoluti - _ g ion and moved its adoption: 82 - 1 - 15 WHEREAS, the following described street easement was ranted New Canada on October 13, 1952 b Le g to the Town of y o J. Zacho: Beg* at the SW corner of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of said Section 25, thence N on W L thereof 66.0 feet; thence E par with S L of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of said Section 25 a distance of 125.0 feet; thence SE'1 225.0 feet E of the WL of said Section 25 Y to a point which is and 33.0 feet N of the S L of said NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 25; thence E ar with said • P d S L of said NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 105.0 feet more or less to a oint on the E L P of said W 1/2 of the W 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4; thence S on the E L W of said W 1/2 of the W 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the S 1/4 a distance of 33.0 feet to a point on the S L of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 25 Township p 29N, Range 22W; thence W on said SL to the point of beg, all subj to McKnight Road right -of- way WHEREAS, the underlying property of record, which includes registered land, described as f 1 the easement, is o lows: Sub j to Rds and Ex part of N 3/4 of NW 1/4 of SW 1/4 E of W at n 642 ft thereof and Wly of a L run NW1 y angle of b3 deg 37 min with S L of SD N 3/4 from PT thereon 1038 ft E from W L of SD 1/4 1/4 art of SD 1 4 except P / 1/4 bet CL of Rd and CL of Hwy p therefrom Registered Land Surveys Nos 21 and 137 all in Section 25, Township 29, Range 22 - 11 - 1/21 WHEREAS, the easement instrument (Document No. 1294734) was recorded on Nov - ember 5, 1952, with Ramsey County Abstract Clerk; WHEREAS, the Certificate of Title for said underlying property (Document No. 290 - 686) does not show an entry for said easement; WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council finds that the release of the above described street easement is in the interest of the public, on the basis.that: 1. It is in excess of the public need. 2. Improvement would not be cost- effective for the abutting properties. 3. Its presence unnecessarily restricts the development of adjacent land. 4. Improvement would be contrary to the intent of maximizing the buffer between single - dwelling neighborhoods and high density residential developments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council, Ramsey County, Minnesota, that the above described street easement be and hereby is released from the abstract system of land records; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said easement release is subject to the recording, under the torrens system of land records, of a utility and drain- age easement, over, under, through, and across the released street easement. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson, 5. Code Amendment: Minimum Floor Areas 8 :00 P.M. Ayes a11. a. Mayor Greavu stated this hearing was continued from the meeting of December 17, 1981. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. C. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. None were heard. d. Councilmember Bastian moved lst reading of an ordinance amending the code re arding minimum floor areas as stated in Alternative II.(Retain the�cur � Code requirements and establish 765 square feet as the minimum area for the levels at and above grade for tri level dwelling Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. G. AW ARD OF BIDS None. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. PAC - Commercial and Industrial: Reconsideration a. Councilmember Bastian moved to reconsider Council's action of January 7, 1982 meeting regarding the PAC Commercial and Industrial charge. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Ander- son, Bastian and Juker. - 12 - 1/21 I. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Nays - Councilmember Maida. 1. Mr. Lehman, 2438 Stillwater Road a. Mr. Lehman requested Council take action regarding the Williams Company pipe- line break that is affecting his property plus the other properties in Maplewood. b. This item is to be discussed under K -8. J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Nature Center Ordinance (First Reading) a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson moved to refer the further review. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes Nays 2. Ordinance: Plan Review Authority: First Rea proposed ordinance to staff for - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Ander- son, Juker and Maida. - Councilmember Bastian. ding a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson moved first reading of an ordinance amending the Code regarding the minimum doll limit fo plan re Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes.- all. 3. Soo Line Railroad Abandonment a. Manager Evans presented the staff report and stated Maplewood should be actively involved in this abandonment for the following reasons: 1. Possible use as a trail 2. The need to acquire easements for existing street and utility crossings I. The City Drainage Plan proposes storm sewer over most of this rail line 4. Expansion and connection of adjacent public properties Recommendation Approval of the enclosed resolution. b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 82 - 1 - 16 WHEREAS, the Soo Line Railroad Company has filed an application with the Inter- state Commerce Commission (ICC) for a certificate permitting the abandonment of a rail line through Maplewood; and - 13 - 1/21 WHEREAS, the application was to be filed on or about December 31, .1981 and if no protests are received within 30 days, the -ICC will grant the abandonment request; and WHEREAS, the rail line could provide an alternate extension of the Minnesota - Wisconsin Boundary Trail into Ramsey County; and WHEREAS, property or easements may be needed for numerous street and utility crossings; and WHEREAS, the Maplewood Drainage Plan proposes a storm sewer along most of this rail line; and WHEREAS, the rail line may be needed to expand and connect adjacent public properties, such as: Maplewood's public works site, Flicek Park, Robinhood Park, Ramsey County's Goodrich and Keller Golf Courses, and John Glenn Juttior High, NOW, THEREFORE, DOES THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD request Ramsey County to act as coordinator for the study and possible acquisition of all or part of the Soo Line rail line; and FURTHER, that the City requests a 180 day public use negotiation period; and FURTHER, that the City be made a party of record and informed of all future actions in regard to the Soo Line abandonment. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. K. COUNCIL PRES ENTATIONS I. Committee a. Councilmember Juker requested a committee be established to investigate the feasibility of a separate school district for Maplewood. b. Councilmember Juker moved that the City Council establish a committee as stated. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson, Councilmember Bastian moved to table this item until June 30, 1985. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Bastian and Maida. Nays - Councilmembers Anderson and Juker. 2. Quad Ordinance a. Councilmember Juker moved to lace on the next agenda an ordinance re ulatin the designs of Quad buildings. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson, 3. Bullets Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson and Juker. Nays - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Bastian and Maida. a. Councilmember Juker moved first readina of an ordinance prohibiting the sellin of "Cop Killer" bullets within the City of Maplewood. — 14 — 1/21 Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes — all. 4. Snow Plowing a. Councilmember Juker questioned the possibility of City crews plowing County roads and have the County reimburse the City. b. Staff stated the. question had been investigated and found to be not feasible. 5. 25th Anniversary a. Councilmember Juker stated this year is the City's 25th Anniversary and quest— ioned if anything was being planned, b. Staff stated it is being thought about. c. Councilmember Bastian will discuss this with the Chamber. 6. Cable TV a. Councilmember Anderson requested the newspapers to place an article stating there is a vacancy on the Cable TV Committee and applicants are being - sought. 7. Water Department a. Councilmember.Anderson expressed his concerns regarding the St. Paul Water Department raising the water rates for suburbs. b. Council directed the City Attorney to investigate the possibility of collecting revenue for all the property located in Maplewood that is owned by the Water Department and also for the City Attorney to obtain an Attorney General's opinion as to whether or not the Water Department can charge the suburbs a higher rate than the City of St. Paul. c. Council authorized the City Manager to proceed with negotiations for a contract with the Water Department. d. Councilmember Bastian stated he will arrange a meeting between the Council and the City's legislative representatives to discuss this item and others. 8. Pipeline Ordinance a. Council instructed the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance regarding regulations on under ground pipelines. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Adolphus Sewer a. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 82 — 1 — 17 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: WHEREAS, THE City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, deems it necessary and expedient that the improvement hereinafter described, be — 15 — 1/21 made; NOW, THEREFORE, notice is hereby given that the City ouncil will • hearing on said improvement at the Y 11 hold a public following time and place within the said C DATE: TIME: February 10, 1982 7 :00 P.M. LOCATION: Edgerton Elementary School C Y mnasium 1929 Edgerton Street Maplewood, Minnesota 55117 The general nature of the improvement is the construction of sanitary . sewer replacement facilities and appurtenant roadway work in the following described areas: I. McMenemy Street from Roselawn Avenue to 700 feet to the north. 2. Roselawn Avenue from Adolphus Street to I -35E 3. Adolphus Street from Roselawn Avenue to Lar enteur Avenue. e. THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENT IS . $371,100.00. It is proposed to assess every lot, piece or parcel of land ben • Cher benefited by said improvement whether abutting eon or not, based upon benefits received without regard to cash valuation. Persons desiring to be heard with reference to the ro osed p p improvement should be present at this hearing, This Council proposes to proceed under the authority anted Y g by Chapter 429 M.S.A. Dated this 20th day of January, 1982. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ Lucille E. A Seconded by Mayor Greavu. 29 A F S C M E City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota Ayes — all. a. Manager Evans stated the AFSCME Union had notified the City Y of their intentions to strike. February 1, 1982 would be the date. It is hopeful a mediation session will be established before this takes place. M. ADJOURNMENT 10:19 P.M. City Clerk - 16 - CIT V OF MAPLE k.GCQ A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A 8 L E - - DATE 02 04 82 PAGE 1 C A M 0 U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E 006,750 000.00 MINN STATE TREASURER. c . �3EPOSIT,, - i3EFUTY R.GIST. 0 06 751 - y 217. B0 INN STATE_ TREASURER STATE D/L FEES PAY A8L - -. _.0_05T.5 00 _ . MIN PCLLUTI CN C O .' QL " _?A_VEL_ f T -- .. RAINING 006 75 3 200000 MI NN STATE TREASURER DNR LICENSE FEES P8L _ 374. MINN STAT TREASURER ONR LI ' C_NS= � FE�S PS L - -_ : :65_- -- - - -- _2..00 _ - SI ST -ATE TREASURER. ..__.DE'4 ITS -CEFU _S TY R�GIST. 006 756 216.00 . MINN STATE . TREASURER ST ATE D/L FE;�S FAY A SL 0 0675 7 743.24 CONN GENE -A i LIFE - ids CO C O N TRI8UTIONS,INSURANC_ _ . 006758 - '� -- - 479.20 _CONK GENERA L, _ IF.E__ INS_Q0 - ----- .CONTFI INSURAN 0,05759 652.38 . POSTMASTER E _ POSTAG� , 0067-60 - 5 2 - • 46 MN STATE TREA F eEsRo A9 E.R. A. DEC PAY ABLE LE ANC -CUE TO OTHER GOAT U 0 0 6 76 1 .8 ,118.15 MN� STATE TREASURER - PERA A _ * E * • GtD PAYABLE ' ANA -wDUE TO CTHER GOVT U 006752 13 0000 MINN STATE TREASURER STATE D/L FZES PAYA3L%. _ 006763 -- - - - - _ _ . 1 - MINN STATE_ TREASURER - - - - -- -- _.C. - POSI T'-Cl- R T. . S 006764 56. RAMSEV CO CLERK ' OF. GIST _ - E CN T Y 0/L 'FEES PAY A BL _ 00676 -__- -- -87.00 -- -- MINN STATE TREASURER _- ST AT E O /t. FEES PAY A E -- - 0 06_ �� _ T _ _ - x±88. - MINN STATE TREASURER- R� G E IST. 006767 120, 00 LEAGUE F MINN O IN CITIES TRAVEL } TRAINING 06768 750.00 POSTMASTER PREFAIC EXPENSE tNS� - -- - -- 6 -Tb s -- -- ___ -. - 2 1 3 T 9.7 5 _ UO C C N T R A C N G _ T i __ _C 0 N T R A_ C T S P AYABLE 006770 53E.50 MINN STATE TREASURER E " . �C�.POSIT,. DEPUTY RtGIST. 0 � . 2 0 3. 0 0 _.. - - MINN STATE TREASURER STATE O/L - FEES PAYABLE 00677 ---- - - - - -- - - ' _Q49000 - METRO WASTE CCNTRCL COMM _S A _C. PAY AELE 006 14x4* 00 . MINN STATE TREASURER STATE 0/ L F EES PAYABLE . .. ...... ... ..• .. .. -. - -. ..iS..i.":+M£.MCrer:: lid °.t`3Nif.[*AYA �..s.r:4.w.il.i�tlp• CI Y Of MAPL E 1000 T A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A 8 L F DATE 0244 -m82 PAGE 2 d C #4E CSC * A M 0 U N T C L A I MI A N T P U RP 0 SE a 0 Ob TT 4 1 07* 25 MI NN STATE TREASURER c„ DEPOSI T" CEPUTY RE GIST. 006775 507.72 -MINN STATE TR EA S- SURTAX SURCHARGE TAX PAYABLE K �II�6 T7 A - -- 1.6.2•_04 __- . _ ICMA RETI RAN NT CC - - - - -. �?P_ - - -- ----- _ -0 E FE FR E D Cate PAYABLE • AND - DEFERRED COMPENSATI F Z 94 - MAPLEWOOD _ STAY �E.O. _INCOME x AY � .TA P AEL.. 006778 6 9690. 09 STATE OF NN MI NN r INCOME TAX PAYAP,' ' 006779 _ - ZOO. 00 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYST -^ OEFEFcRt0 COMP PAYABLE -678 89L --- - - - - -- -227.* 0 _. - ___MN M UTU 1.1 FE N - - -- .S.__C - _ o_ E FER RED C _PAYA S L 006781 299.58 AFSCME LOCAL 2725 UNI Ch DU,.S PAYABLE " -FA S H ARE F PAY = Q06782 - 24.00 METRC SUPER VISCRY' A SSOC UNI CN OU_5 FAYA8L� 006783 10,533.50 CITY t CTY CRECIT UNION CREDIT UNION DEO PAYA ri 306784 - --- 145.0Q. ROSEMARY KANE pP G _�._ EUCTICMS PAYABLE 006785 574.68 MN TEAMSTERS LCCA * L 320 E UNION DU ES P AYaBL P �. A N D -FAIR SHARE FEES . AY } 005786 187.50 MAPLEWOOD ATE' A ST BANK WAGE DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE' 006787 lo 77 STAT MN S.0 ER - FICA DUE TO OTHER GOVT UNITS _ wee _ F E E S,9 S E3 �I CE - _ .. - - - _ Certification exam s 006789 6. 30 MN MINING t MFG CO SUPPLIES, OFFICE 0 06 T9 0 326* 85 'THE UNIVERSITV CLUE OF FEES ER ,,S VIC _ - _.PARK- -_RE. S-.0 RT Gals Get -A -Way F E .ES , ___ SE R V I C E - - -- . 006792 ,� 47.00 OLD TCWN RESTCRATICN Special Events FEES, SERVICE 006793 70950 JAMES J HILL HCUSE Gala___ _Get - - Way_ - ___- FEES, SERVICE ____.0 0 6 19-4_... -_ -9 6 2: _25. _w_ _-__M I N K._ .S TAT E._T R E A S.U�R Gals Get -A -Way _._._ DE..P � - F Y . . �� � T.�_ DE UT . _ Rc � GI-S T! - 006795 3 72• QO MINN STATE TREASURER STATE C F P AYABLE T E !L F EES SL E 00679 . �8.0 0 METRO R C - - AREA MGT ASSOC TRAVEL t TRAINING S A LE..S._A x PAYABLE - 4 z CITY OF MAPLEWOCO A C C C U N T S P A Y 8 L E DATE 02 PAGE 3 CHECK* A M a U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P D S t 006 - 79.8 291000 RAmSEY CTY C CNCILIATION - FEES, SERVICE Filing Fee,Ambularnce _ 006799 978.25 MINN STAVE TREASURR DEPOSITS- CEPUTY RE.GIST. 142.00 -._.. MINN—STATE- .- ST.ATE_ _TREASURER. -TAT -D/L _SEES FAY ABLE 005801 57050 RAMSEY CO CLERK OF DIST CNTY D/L FEES PAY AELE 006802 179050 MINN STATE TREASURER DEPOSITS - DEPUTY GIST. _ 006 80 3 _ _ - - 41. 00` - -- MINN STATE. TREASURER___-- .---__ e STATE D/L FEES PAY AEL.= aC63C 4 3 MAPLELEAF CFFICIALS ASSN FEES, SERVICE -MAA Basketball & Volleyball 0 80 E 549.05 MINN STATE TREASURER DEPOSI TS- DEFUTY RE GIST. 006806 _. 305.00 MINN STATE -- -- - -- _STATE C/L - FEES PAYABLE 006807 234* 30 'MINN STATE TREASURER OEFOSITS- DEPUTY RE 00b 80 8 729*00 MINN STATE TREASURER STATE D/L FEES PAYA9LE - .0068.0° - 1000 METRCFCLIT.AN CCUNC..TL ------ - - - - -- ---- .- _- SUPFLIESI OFFICE- _ 60 7+,947.61 NECESSAR - Y EXPENDITURES SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING • CITY OF MAPLE 0.00 A C C C U N T' S PAY Y A B L E DAT 02 . C T CHE A M C U N - T C L A I M A N T P U R P C S E PAGE 4 012359 - 219 *10 AMERICAN TOOL SUPPLY CO ECUIPMENT, OTHER 012360 .30900 - AQUAZYME MID %EST FEES, - SERVICE • Chemical Toilets 2 a �� JAMES_ _8AHT_ ._- - - _ ---- - - - -_- - _ ---- FEES DE VICE _ • 01236.2 _ 350 34 BOARD OF HATER COMM Heating Inspector UTILITIES 012363 1, 095. fol EOARD OF WATER, COMM ___ -- OUTSIDE r_NGINEERIN G FE _ _.. Q 1235 �� —__ 1 T, 0 -- - - BOARD OF WATER _ZCMto. 012365 . 8455 9,2 BOARD OF MATER COMM AI TENA M! N NCt ' MATERIALS 012366 1 BOARD OF WATER COMM OTHER CONSTRUCTION COS _-------- .2 - - BULL.S EYE JNC. S P .ICS �tANG �► _ E 01.236 E 91, 63 CEMSTCNE PROCt CTS CO MA I K E N A E M T C A E IR I a L s 012369 19326.52 COLLINS ELECTRICAL CONST REP, } PAINT., 8L0G +G%R0 AND , wREP. ; MAINT,, 4:E C U I 012370 2 9 518000 QELAUNT VOTC C.G FEES, SERVICE "'O Dec. Audit __ .. 123.7_. -- _-- .185. _ - - GENERAL OFFICE _F?R-0CUCTS ___EO.UIPMENT_, OFFICE 012372 1,.051.00 GEOTECHNICAL ENG CORP OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEE Oi23T3 19007 JANET GREW SUPPLIES, PROGRAM AND- TRAVEL f TRAINING E S !9 -SERVICE Parking 012 374 27.23 HALLMARK MA I � TENANCE MATERIALS 012375 81P195.97 LAIS BANNIGAN t -CIRESI FEES, SERVICE AND - LEGAL + FISCAL 012376 118003 HANDO PHOTO __.__Nov_- , De.c . , -Servi.ces .__ . _ -- FEES, SERVICE Photo Ref ini shing - _5.0.95 _ _ MILL R _CL Q THI NC__ ._uMOR.MS_ _ CL0TfiIN G -.____ 012 37 8 125.00 MN DEPART PUBLIC RE NTAL , EQUIPMENT Ot237 � 3,820900 - INFIELD A MITCHELL, -_- - - -- -__ LEGAL }� FISCAL - _SV - pP LI.E.S io -- VEHICLE 012 381 95.15 RA MSEY -COUNTY TREASURER MAINTENANCE MATERIALS CITY CF MAPLEWOOD A C C O U N T S P A Y A 8 L E DATE C2 -04 -82 P. AG= 5 C HE CK A M C U N T C L A' I M A N T P' U R P O S E 012382 7 , 9 489.60 RAHSEY COUNTY TREASURER MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 012383 -- - - 119.38 - RAMSEY COUNTY TRtASURER _- SUPPLIES, OFFICE 12.38 4 - - _ _... _ - - . 2 4 7. 0 RICE STR C AR WA SH------- : --- - - _ R E P • ♦ M A I N T . t VEHICL . AND- FEES SERVICE 181. 02 _ S _ - } T . OFFICE - _- .._.Sly LI E c s OFFICE 0 12356 279924.22 SCHGELL } MADSCN INC OUTSIDE ENGINE FEE` 012.387 E SHORT- ELLICTT I-tNORICKSN FEES, SERVICE AND-OUTSICE ENGINE = R INS 7 Dec. Services 012 38.8 48989 CHKRISTI E SOU TTER SU FPLIES PROGRAM AND- TRA%;L + TRAINIIsG 012389 786.75 CITY OF ST PALL � REP. * MAINT., EOUI PM= *4' AND -►REP. f FAINT,, RArI 012390 984.70 CITY Cf ST PALL Fi. SERVICE Chemical Analysis 11E.91 E SUPERAMERICA - _ - -- - - UE� f CIS. ANA- sUF�5, VEHICLE AN - L tS, EQUI PHEW 012392 7E.5G TABULATING SERV BUREAU _ r FEES, SERVICE Data Process in - 012 39 3 _ _ 814.98 TOL Z, KING s OU VALL _ _._._.. - - -- -- OW - -- OU SIO _NGINE tRIN G Fz� 012394 224. 25 UNIFORMS UNLI KITED UN I FCC? MS + CLCTHIN G 01239, - - ; - 63.54 VIRTU FRINTING CC SUPPLIES, OFFICE B12396 R 44.12 WESTINGHOUSE ELt"CTRIC - -- - _ _ -- - SUPPLIES, JANITORIAL 012397_ 70.0O PARIGN DEVAHL WAGES4p ' P/T ♦ TEMP. 012 : 2 098 ia5. 00 LINDA DIXON - - -- - - - - -- , - - - 'WA GE S, 2 /7 TEMP* 01 _ _ 57900 _ M ICHELE ANN MAMRE _ -- WAGES.,. P/T TEMP. 012400 57. T5 JULIE MCCOLLUMC WAGES, P/T + TEMF. 01240 1 110.43 JULIE MCTZ WAG P/T } TEMF. 72* 84 - � OARLEMZ SMITH- _ - -- WAGES, P/T + TEMP. AND-& TRAVEL + TRAINI NG - - -- 01240.3 ' __ �.._ 40.42 . MICHAEL J TGENSING - - - -- --------- �.- - -_ ____ _ _ 14A GES 9 P/T f TEMP. _ CITY OF MAPLE W OOD A C C 0 U N T S p A Y A g E �. ()ATE G 4- _ r � T _ 04 82 QAGI� b CHE CK* .A M C U N T C L' A I M A N T IF U R C. S g 01240 4 115.50 R IC14 ARD ALL WAR ZEKA MBA G ES, P!T # TEMP. 012 40 c 80,000 C UA L I T Y CLEANING _S ER V - -- -- - -_ - _- - - - -.. - - - -. �� EIS v S: .VICE Rug Cleaning __Q 1240--6 ___________ -600 o 0 _ U N I T E G AR TI S TS T H.E AT ER ___ _ -- _ -- _+_ E .. _. U N 0 012407 . 22.40 ADVANCE STAMP CORF S RP � Lz Es, OFFICE 012408 5o42 � A R T S i G N - -. _ -- SUPPLI ES, 0 FFI CE - 012409 __ _ _.- 1598 _ OEBG .$.A STYR TF VE T _- �.A L T.�,A NI NG 012410 90 *35 . BATTERY TIRE WHSE INC SUPP T LI tS, VEH,� CLE 012411 2 3 5.5 8 I. L B G Y E R F w R __ - -- __ __ __ ---- _- - -- -- S U P I E S �' �. + VEHI 0 124 - 1 - 2. __.__ . _ _ _ _. 50.00 RAI F 0 FIRE. CEPT _. __ -- TR AVEL * T AI viNG 012413 50,13 CLUTCH + TRAN c.MISSION SUPPLIES, VEHICLE 012414 96099 CCN+TINENTAL SAFETY EQUIP - -- -- - U - N I w I OR MS CLOTHING . - -- 0 12 41 22.9.2 -COPY EQUIPMENT ---- --- - -- -- U�P�,I ES, OFFICE 01241E 127. X30 OELANGES GRASS CUTTING NEED CUTTING SERVICE 012417 12. g5 FIFE ENGI NEEFcI hG . SUBSCR #- MEM N _RS I 0 - 12 45- �.._ _ -_ 55.28 - FLAGHCUS� INS.. - -_ __ _ — -- F' �. LI_S, PROGRAM - -- - U �' . 012419 90. 00 FLEKIELE PIPE TOOL CO SUFFLI ES ' VEHICLE 012420 19231.A+ 6 GARWOGD - EQUIPMENT OTHER 15, J0 GO VT FINANCE RE..S.E.A`RG H- -CT -- -- - . - -. ._..SUS SCRIPTIONS +MEMD ERS I 0 40 .80 GRUBERS HARDWARE DANK MA I ti=ENANGE MATErRI AL S 012423 991.84 HILLCREST GLASS CO REP - NA �, INT., D�.uG } GR7, V 1.2 42 -- -- - - - _ 5. 30 H O W I E S .LOCK ±. K ELY_ -- REP - _± _ M A I N T s BLDG + G R 0 0 i2 42= 138019 KNOX LUKBER CCMFANY - MAINTENANCE M ATERIAL ' S ATERIALS 01242E 2.E00* 00 LAIS f $ANNIGAN TRUST CO LANG - EASEMENTS TS ___0 12 42_ . _- 321050 ._ __ _R 1 C H A F 0 J _LANG S1 P L I E S, PROGRA 012428 66900 MICHAEL J MAZZITELLO REP. * PAINT., RADIO CITE OF MAPLEWOCC A C C 0 U N- T S P A Y A B L E CATS 02 - -82 WAGE 7 - CHEC A M 0 U N T C L 'A I M A N T P U F P 0 S� 012429 17990 MERIT CHEVROLET CO SUPPLIES, VEHICLE 012430 879939.93 METRO WASTE C CNTROL COMM SEWAGE TRt ATMENT - 012431 _ _� - 32.54 _ CANIEL NETTLER - _ SUPPLIES, PROGRAM 012432 12.00 - NON CRIME PREVENTION SUBSCRIPTIONS +MEM3ERSHI 012433 10. ov MN STREET SUPERINT ASSOC - SUgSC tI�TICt�S +McMa ERSNi _0 - 12434 _ 19528.00 MOTOROLA I NC --- _____ - - - - -- - - - -- - - EGUIFHENT, OTHER; 012435 5.00 MUNICIPALS TREASURER SU8SCRIFTj0NS +MEM3ERSHI 01243E 2 Eb2. 00 NUCC INC BUI;.CING IMFOV Eft ME PVT 012 3 7 - 54.00 ivA3L CCU' ,IL ON GO IT ACC. _ - -- _ _ SUBSCRIPTIONS ♦MEM9ERSHI 01243 f 1b.60 NORTH ST PAW. WELDING IN MAINTENANCE MATER"ALIZ 012 43 S 400983 NOR BELL TE.L - -CC _-- _ - -_ -_- - TI L. FH CN` _ 12 440 8 . 00 NORTHWESTERN EELL Jr - CO ___ -- - _.. TE LEFHCNE 012441 20.00 LAVERNE NUTESCN UNIFORMS # CLOTHING - 012j442 20.00 GERALD OWEN UN I FCRMS + CLOT HIN G 012443 7920 J05EP# PR TTNER TRAVEL t TRAINING 012444 32940 RAMSEY COUNTY TREASURER OUTSIOE ENG+NEEFIN G F`E 012445 41.25 S + T OFFICE FRCOUCTS SUPPLI'S, OFFIC= ANO -FEES, SERVICE _ Repair File door 01244E 34.45 C C SHARRO CC INC SUPPLIES, VE HICL - 012447 _ 96.01 STD SFRING _f_ ALIGNMENT. -- - -- -- - - RAP. + P!AI NT., VEHICLES 0124.4e 35. X10 J THOMAS ATHLETIC CO SUFPLIES, PROGRAM 012449 30:49 HERB TOUSLEY FCRO INC - -- - .— --- -- - - -- REF • + pAINT., VEHICLES 0 1245 - -- _� 45 32 TRUCK UTILITIES + MFG-- LO. - -- ------ -.____ SUFPLIES, VEHICLE 012451 8000 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS ; CLOTHING 012452 192.00 VIRTUE PRINTING CC FEES, SERVICE ' Envelopes reprinted . with P. 0. Box CITY OF MAPLE WOOD ACCOVNT S pAY ABL DAT 02'04m82 PAG; 8 CHECK* A 'M 0 U N T C L. A I H A N T P AJ R P 0 S E WAGES, P/T TEMP, ROGER.-S ..NELSQN._,_____ .-WALES.9 ____P/T 01246 81t03 212021 -WAGERS P/T f REP* PAINT. ,t EAU IFM=7N 9000 CE-AN R.NYSAKKE WAGS XG-SUFFIWIES, OFFICE. -01247-1 012454 $o 97 WARNERS TRUEVALUE HOw'Rp SUPPLIES, JANITORIAL 012455' 58*04 ZIEGLEF INC SUPPLIES 9 VEHICLE. A,__6 ' . r -.--- - ---- -- I B. 0:0.. 13.ENNIS 8ART.H0LCMEK___ T-EMF9 C12457' 16000 DAVIC BEALKE WAGES, P/T + TEMPo 01.245t 160 00 GREGORY S OT HWELL WAGEe P/T TEMP. A-12-45 c 012475 W_AG._ESt..P/7._+ MP o1246 *0 26010 RICHARD BUNKE WAGS P/1 + TEMco 01-2461 32*00 COUGLAS OEHLER WAGOAES9 P/ T . + _46 2. _14*00 WA G -ES v F / T. TEMP • THEW 012463 98e HATTHFW HAAG 012464 140-00 THEMMOCOPE LEGMAN _STEP H,4',.N LEIIAY--- Iwo WAG"—Sq F/I + TrEmp, WAGES, P/1 TEMPI _WA.G E S-9 _F/ 7 T Em P-• U12465 158. BO THOMAS LIBHARCT WAGES, P/7 f TEMPS 012467 19,000. JAMES MAGILL WAGES, P/T TEMP, ROGER.-S ..NELSQN._,_____ .-WALES.9 ____P/T 01246 65*45 RONALD C NIELSEN WAGES e P/T f TEMP 012470 9000 CE-AN R.NYSAKKE WAGS P/T T ZE M Re -01247-1 ----MICHAEL _-J0.SEP_H__FE_L.TI.ER -WASES9 -.P/T.-.+- - TEmPo. 012472 165930 JEFF ERY RASCHKE WAGES, P/T TEMP 012473 65*45 14ICHAEL J TOENSING P/7 TEMPO WAGES, -0 1 Z-47 4 .---15-9- 00-. -MRS STEPHAN __A_UG1E_ 012475 22000 KATHLEEN BAUSCH R E F U N 0 012476 11000 JUDY BAIER N 0 R E F U 11 QV JUL I -A N N F L E I S HE- R. 9 CITY . CF MAPL EWOOD A 'C C 0 U N T S F A Y A 9 L E DATE 02 PAO_ .CHE * A M 0 U N T C L A I. N A N T U R P 0 S E 01247f 1.11000 DAN HALVORSON R E F U N D 012+79 11000 ROBYN .HELTNE R E F U N 0 0.12 0 . .__ _... — .11.00 JO ,J CS! ANE f U N 0 01248.1 11.00 P A U L JCH NSON R E F U N 0 ;j � 012482 -.-.. 13. O D NANCY L A N G R - - -E - F U N 0 -- _ 0124 8 3 - - i?.00 MR R LEEMAN R E F U N 012484 11.3D COLORES NUDE'K R E F U N 0 1 012485 17. 00 ELEANOR. NEACHAM R E F U N - 0 01248E n 11.X30 MARILYN NOVAK -- - R E F U N u 012487 25.50 PHYLLIS ROUSE R 4 F U N 0 012488 n 13030 PATRICIA WERDEN R E F U N 0 t.. 012489 5. oa GEORCIANA ANDRLS - - __... R � E F l3 h ' 0 131 17", CHECKS . WRITTEN TOTAL OF 191 CHECKS TUTAL 245, 297.08 INDICATES. ITEMS FINANCED BY RECREATI -ON FEES-----. - z { 9 OF. MAPLEWOCD PAYROLL REPORT PAGE 1 CERTIFICATION REGISTER CHECK DATE Oi -28 -82 EVK _ ____ _ N AM GROS PAY NE PA Y _ 2753 - ANDERSON NORMAN G 275900 2 38.9 + , ._�__.__.. _ A 6ASTIh ._Y___ _�GA R ____ 256057 N 275 ..00 . ZT54 27 5 5 GRE JOHN C 350080 2 5 2. i 6 2756 JUKER FRANCES L 275.00 2 28.11 2 757 -- - _ MA 237.95 _ . T 275.00 2758 E V A NS BARRY R 1 6 8 2. T6 1. 14* 0 - - 2759 LEWIS VIVAN R 685.38 457.70 2760 KLEIN JAMES G il4.75 103.77 2Tbi -- -- _ P 4ELQI - - - -- CU _. _ - - - - - -- - - -� - -- ALFREfl -- -____. _- --_._. __.._ - � _--_ _.691 _ __ -- 2762 CUDE LARRY J l91.54 145.11 2763 00FERTY KATHLEEN M 2.21942 286. i5 27 64 ZUERCHEO R J JOHN L 1 5 _ 39 _ 114. 9 - - 9 -- - -- - - - -- -- -- - -- - - -.. _ .._ _ ._ _ -. -_ -- _- _ _. _ . T 2765 F AUST DANIEL F it 339.39 88 2766 .__ .. FRANK PATRICIA L______.._. i 49.54-------- -- -_._ 211.50 2767 H A GEN 'ARLI NE .! 8 22 .92 3 61.9 0 - - - - 2768 HATI-EYS ALANA K 597.23 435919 27 69 VIGOREN 3ELDRES • 7. 2770 A UR ELI US LUCI LLE E i 25 0. 6 53*36 - 0 2771 S ELVOG BETTY D 639069 410.44 0 2772 GREEN PHYLLIS C 667.39 467,.39 02773 S CH ADT JEA L 152.6 _ 425 95 3 02774 VIETOR LORRAINE S 521.54 356906 0 itt5 ---- .. HIEh5L i - - -- - -- - y - - PATRI A 241.'50 ._. 181098 02776 9ASTY DEBORAH A - 492.93 2 2 4.46_ 0 27 77 H AG:EN THOMAS L i, 316.62 253.44 OF MAPLE WCOD PAYROLL REPORT F ORT PAGE 2 774 497 CERTIFICATION REGISTER CHECK DATE 0 I w 28- 8 2 HEC � - _ NAME 0 2794 _ GR PAY NET PA R .� 798. 0 27 78 ONATH JOY E 612, 30 342.63 fl 2779 - RIC CAROL RICHARD ' - J 276.90 L 452.31 02780 ^S CHALLER -- - - -_ RICHARD W 19 875 42 0.27,81 SVENOSEN JCANNE M 60 8.77 39 .0 5 4 6 - AR N CL D .______ .-- _ ---- .-- -- DAVID 1 0 36.61 6 77.0 9 - --------- - - -... - - -.__- _-- -- - - 410 . 8T L 1, 0 27 83 ---- ATC _ --- - - - - -_ - JCHN- - - -_- N_ _. 1s 0 36 69 Z8 02784 CAHANES ANTHONY G 1 204.16 s 119.1 0 1 02785 C LA U SN DALE K l io 0 3 6:15 ". 16 0.64 - - - -- - -- - - -__. _ 0 27 86 _ C,CLLI NS KENNETH . 1,17 5. 219940 � 278 O 7 M DEL ONT OENNI S J 1, 233.24 86.68 027 -A D R E G ER RICHARD ..._._ 749.43 C 1, 348.46 02789 -- FERNOW_ RAYMOND _ 4 98o77 342.33 02790 GREEN NCR.MAN L 1,195.85 636e43 02791 HALW£G KEVIN 519.83 R 19016977 0279 H EINZ J 774 497 02793 HER EER T MICHAEL J 1 16 5 91.63 0 2794 _ J - - -- --- .- -__ - -- DANIEL R .� 798. 509 T7 - - __ -_-- -- - - -- 02795 _ KOFTUS_________ ___ _DONALD V 76. 26 68.55 0 27 96 LANG RICHARD ' - J 1, 056.00 586 85 97 0 27 97 - - -- MCNULTY _ _. - - JOHN J � _ 1 , 9 27 3.84 - -- __-- ---- --- -_. - -- 301003 0279 M EE HAN , JR _- -- - JAM ES E 9 97038 593.43 2799 METTLER DANIEL B 1 0 36.61 6 77.0 9 28 00 - lQESCHTER RICHARD - - - i, O ib. 77 141e99 - 0 _ M0R E_lLI ___- - - - -- RA J_ _ i, fl 16 77 674. 0 28 02 PELTIER WILLIAM F 1,151.54 6 37.42 0 OF HAFLEWCOD PAYROLL REPORT PAGE A 3 CERTIFICATION REGISTER CHECK DATE O i- 28 8 2 H NAME GRO PAY NET PA 02803 SKALMAN DOHALO N 19102.56 212.42 0 Z 04 StAFN_ - GR EGORY b 270 97 L 1, 016.77 0 28 05 STILL V ERNON 997.38 592.71 02806 STOCKTON DARRELL T 997.38 652.02 02807 i JOSE i ! 7 41 i 4 0 A 1 0 28 08 SECKER -_ -- _ _ -__ __--- ._ -. -- - -- RONALD _ _- - -___- - _- fl 1,_ t� 6 5.2 3 258921 02899 CUS CK OENNI S S 1, 335.74 8 23.14 02810 � _ R A F... DA VID M 1 9 0 b 5.2 3 0 LEE ROGER N 1 , 1 0 4. 00 6 22.68 0281.2 MELANCER JON A 1 138.54 . 7 - 20- - 5 - - -------------._____--___------------- l,1. 0.5.58 02814 _ RA ZS KA ZOFF DALE _ E 1 2 31. i 7 02815 RYAN MICHAEL P 1, 055.23 4 84.0 9 028.16__._--- VORWERK._ -_- --- - - - - -- - ROBERT E -- 1,11.23 207,79 .- . - - - -- 02817 Y CUNGREN JAMES G 1,045.84 6.24.59 02818 .EMBERTSON JAMES M 845.08 551.79 . 819 SCI-aD ALFRED C 1, 0 44 *00 b 29.95 02820 FLAUGHER JAMEE L 7009 446.90 0 28 21 FULLER JAMES D 543.23 393924 0 28 Z2 � N E�.SG N - - -_ - -._ .�. _ - - -- --- �CAREN__- - A - .---- ---- -- 571.38_ - 02823 rNELSON ROBERT - M 1, 560. ' 8 59 43 02824 SWANSON JILL D 509006 334902 02825 nICHELE A 571.38 276.58 02826 WILLIAMS DUANE J 1 , 906 5o 43 480.4 02827 SARTA MARIE L 428.88 301.64 C HAPLEWCOD t� PAYROLL REPORT PAGE 4 - • CERTIFICATION REGISTER , CHECK DATE �i•28- 82 HECK NA G ROSS PAY NET PA 1 1102828 HA IDER � KENNETH G 1, 230.92 5 43.5 6 0 28 29 WEGNERTH JCdi H � .A 459. b0 _____— -_ __ .. ___ _ .__ -..._ ._. .. _. 331.92 � O 28 30 C AS S --- -- WILLIAM --- -- WILLIAM C _ 517967 10 28 31 FREBERG RONALD L 763920 4 i.4 8 4 O 2 8 3 2 #� E . E Y _ ...�. _.�._ RO J _ - - 3 , b Z x!0 HOC�OAN JOSEPH M 733.65 483.58 - KANE MICHAEL R 823o?? 346 85 i0 28 35 � KL A U S I N G � HENRY ______ F . 9 42 8.12 ?0 2 3 6 _ MEYE _ ___-- GERALD - -- __ W 633. 4 11.2 42837 PRETTNER JOSEPH 8 11101.63 b 8 7 2.i 0 2 + -- REIhERT� � - EDW A 798 98 ;0 2839 --- TEVLI t JR _ HA RR Y _ --- _. 836.1 523e49 '0 2840 ELIAS JAMES G 9Q8.77 1 ii I 5 8. -0 28 41 GEISSLER TER 65985 5 0 Z.3 D 28 4 2 GE� E _ ' JAMES T 8 27. 5 40909 7D 28 43 PECK DENNIS L 908077 507,52 =0 28 44 _ PI LL A T Z KE _ a AVID � � J i, 0 T 1.24 � b 9 - - -_ -------- _---- __ = - - -- ---___ 3.32 D 2 45 _`WYM JAMES N 73 8.45 5 07. Q1 1 28 46 LUTZ � . 0AVi0 P 569* 93 9 . 3 82.29 D 2847 + BREHEIM ROG w Ties a ol 434.90 _ -- , 0 2 EDSON _ DAVID 8 777.60 4 8 . 32849 MUL WEE GEORGE W b 76.81 417 84 02850 NACEAU EDWARD A 777. b0 513023 0 2 851 NU TES QN L AVERNE S -- _—. 1 9 .007 9 2 0 425: D 28 52 OWEN - GERALD C 777.60 4 5fl.83 OF MAPLE WC00 PAYROLL REPORT PAGE � i , 263. 77 9.00 CERTIFICATION REGISTER CHECK DATE 01 28 ECK NAM 396:38 , GROSS PAY NE P � A Y I 0 G 3 t# 4. i 6 4� -- - - -_ - 2853 MACDONALD JOHN E 841.60 442.73 2854 HULVAk Y __ _ t ENNIS M 2862 HELEY 813.60 28 ` A PAULI NE M 97 5 80.86 . ,lEFFREiI 2856 BRE NNER LOIS J 651.57 2 37.43 - 8 57 KR U HM EL 6 R 8 A R A A 83 4. 15 2.1 fl 27 2.31 )2858 ODEGARD ROBE D i , 263. 77 9.00 X2859 BURKE MYLES J 763.21 396:38 , - 28 bfl � �R � A; � � A Y I 0 G 3 t# 4. i 6 4� -- - - -_ - � A , - � T 6 3.20 P2 GUSINOA MELVIN J 1 9 177 0 17 6 36.80 2862 HELEY ROLAND 8 763.20 498.69 28 63 LEMON ,lEFFREiI S 02873 75.6 0 75060 2864 HARUSKA HARK A 83 4. 5 11.62 2865 R ASCHKE ALBERT F 80085 72.20 - -- - E:KS�RA .Hp -___ -_ T - - - - -- __. - T H ©MA S -- _ 426974 .___ - - - -- ---- _.__ - - - - -. _._----.._--_-- � 2 0 0 . 1 Z - J --- - -218900 � 2867 SANTA REED E 777 440.32 2868 TAUBMAN DOUGLAS J 679. 429.55 2869 . - - - -- WARD -- Roy G 3 t# 4. i 6 i35695 2870 GREW JANET M 600000 393.98 2871 S HORSNELL JUDITH A 284400 214.69 1 02872 SQUTTER CHRISTINE 634.16 437096 02873 CHLEBECK JUDY N 63 2 49.80 02874 OLSON GEOFFREY- N 1* 241.08 703987 0 2875 -- - - - - -- - E:KS�RA .Hp -___ -_ _--- -_ - T�o�as - - -.._ _ 426974 .___ - - - -- ---- _.__ - - - - -. _._----.._--_-- _G 758. 07 02876 JOHNSO RAN L 727038 49 02877 OSTROM MARJORIE 1, 049.54 654.90 Y Of MAPLE PAYROLL REPORT PAGE - CERTIFICATION GISTS R CHECK LATE 01 -28- 82 G H EC K NAME - G RO S S PA Y NET PAY___ - t 02878 NEN GER ROBERT J 831006 495,o59 MEC K REGISTER - ToTAL s 1~ 5,282.7Q 18i *251.32 ,0 2 8 79 Horsn J udith A 413.08 311.32 02752 Brunell Barbara J 343.82 25.7.27 CHECK REGISTER TOTALS: 102,008.22 54 851.29 MEMORANDUM TO City Manager E FROM: Director of Public Works ;, DATE: January 29, 1982 SUBJECT: Keller Parkway Bridge North of County Road C Projects S.P. 62- 622 -02 and S . P . 62- 622 -03 State funds have become available for construction of the Keller Parkway bridge north County , ,Road C. The City has requested reconstruction of this bridge several times in recent years. The present structure will not support the weight of emergency fire vehicles. The new bridge will be built to carry heavy loads. Ramsey County has requested adoption of the attached resolutions. It is important that the City take quick action because a bid date of March 17, 1982 is anticipated. It is recommended the City Council adopt the attached resolutions. Mn /DOT 30182 (Revised 12 -80) RESOLUTION WHEREAS, plans for Project No. S.P. 62- 622 -02 showing proposed alignment, profiles, grades and cross - sections for the construction, reconstruction or improvement of County State -Aid Highway No. 22 within the limits of the City s a (Federal) State y )t ) Aid Project have been prepared and presented to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That said plans be in all things approved. Dated this State of Minnesota County of Ramsey City of Map , day of , 19 82 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Maplewood at a meeting thereof held in the City of Maplewood , Minnesota, on the day of , 19 '82 , as disclosed by the records of said City in my possession. (Seal) Mn /DOT 30182 (Revised 12 -80) RESOLUTION WHEREAS, plans for Project No. S •A.P. 62-- 622 -03 showing proposed alignment, profiles, grades and cross- sections for the construction, reconstruction or improvement of County State -Aid Highway No. - 22 within the ' • limits of the C�.ty as a (Federal) (State) Aid Project have been prepared and presented to the City NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That said plans be in all things approved, Dated this , day of CERTIFICATION 19 820 State of Minnesota County of 'Ra ms e y City of Maplewood I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Maplewood p _ at a meeting thereof held in the City , of Maplewood Minnesota, on the day of , 19 82 , as disclosed by the records of said City in my possession. (seal) �3 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer DATE: January 27, 1982 SUBJECT: English Street North of Kohlman Ave. Street and Utility Improvements PROJECT N0, 81 -11 Enclosed herewith is the feasibility study for the above referenced improve- ment. The study investigates- the engineering feasibility and estimates the project cost for extension of street and utilities to serve two presen undeveloped parcels. Since the developers of the parcels have not yet approached the City with respect to the proposed configuration of the subdivision, we are recommending that the City Council accept the report and postpone ordering a public hearing until a preliminary plat is received from the developers. The configuration of the subdivision is necessary to determine which alternate is preferable and to determine the exact length and location of the proposed improvements. DJP /Ftb encl. a.' _ . J MEMORANDUM t s TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Devel Y P SUBJECT: English Street Improvements DATE: January 27, 1982 Background 4 � J D(16_�%, State law requires that the Planning Commission review all ubl i c capital p p� tai improvement projects within the City. Section 462.356 of the State l sta tes that: "After a comprehensive municipal plan or section thereof has been recommended by the planning agency and a copy filed with the overn- 1 ng body, no publicly c1 owned i 9 P Y interest � n real property r�i thi n • the muni cipality shall be acqui red or disposed of, nor shall an ca i tal improvement be authorized b the y • y m unicipality ci pal i ty or special district or agency thereof or any other political subdivision having jurisdiction within the municipality u 9 - u ntil after the planning agency has reviewed the proposed acquisition, disposal, or capital improvement and n reported in writing to the governing body p • ,9 o . 9 g y or other special district or agency or political ti cal subdivision concerned, its findings are to r compliance of the proposed acquisition, - • P . P q , disposal or improvement with the comprehensive municipal pal plan. Project Description The project would consist of the installation of sanitary sewer, watermai n y ' storm sewer and street facilities along the presently unimproved English Street right -of -way, north of Kohlman Avenue (see Ma Two), . ) De velopment of Adjacent Parcels The petitioners wish to subdivide and develop their property (Map Two), An application for'subdivision of these properties has not been received. -Land Use Plan The Land Use Plan (map three) designates English , Stre from County Road C to north of Beam Avenue as a major collector. However, due to poor soil conditions north of the petitioner's property, the City Engineer i neer recommends that English Street should not be a through street and that its planned function should be revised to that of a local street. The al for a major collector should � s o be .moved to the west along the east boun dary of the land planned for Service Commercial Use. 1 Analysis The f e a s i b i l i t y study should be accepted. Plans and specifications, however, should not be ordered until a preliminary plat is approved for the adjoining properties. Lot area and lot frontage requirements are major factors in determining the alignment of streets. Therefore, to maximize the use of the land, street specifics should be based upon an acceptable arrangement of lots. Recommendation I. That the Planning Commission make a finding that the improvement of English Street is not consistent with the Land Use Plan. The Plan should be revised to eliminate the major collector designation for proposed English Street because of poor soils. A hearing date should be set for February 15 to consider this amendment and a possible realignment of the collector street further west. II. Council should accept the feasibility study, but table action on the ordering of plans and specifications for the improvement of English Street, north of Kohlman Avenue, until a preliminary plat is approved for the adjoining property. Enclosures 1. Location Map 2. Property Line Map 3, Hazelwood Neighborhood Land Use Plan 4. Engineering Feasibility Report 5. Memo from the Assistant City Engineer 19 VADNAIS HEIGHTS p 0 .J f wv 2 /L i s wo J w 1 e GERVAIS � r 01 � s � JI LELANO�] 25 o JUN TI I u RKE _ ELDRIDQ pN LELMO t 14 If IF I F�! t W � N = t '1 �iklaWdu PUBLIC WORKS am. e L in 00 Map 1 LOCATION MAP RA AT ri � t W KOHLMAN ED EMILL MD. � 65 J Z 1- W O � h = 3 A 1 i &V t Fur t / t '+ 4 - '- -•-'� - -- - _.- a ...v _... i l 1 • M •.N � . i/ :•i •: i � ;•;rte � .. • r • •• 1 ; {• I :: �,:� • : r` a 'mot � r ` �•, 1. •• `.nom T : �'�/ � f - ••�: �: • • � •"f l ° } tr � V � • `1 of : i • i :: � 1 � i- 4 IL o k �• • tl '� ••: :: :• :':• �: r.. r....:: :. � # KOHLMAN -AVE b ILL IJ C Z 7 66f L lei i� t 3x 11} �- tc Z ° j 1 C� 1 i "• i 1 � t t �7 ! so 1 p ommmmomommumaw Qum now � .. 9 e Map 2 PRO PERTY LINE MAP English Street Right -of -Way ••$r Pro Af to be Improved Property ted •. r ti:4• titirf 4 N r� '+ 4 - '- -•-'� - -- - _.- a ...v _... i l 1 • M •.N � . i/ :•i •: i � ;•;rte � .. • r • •• 1 ; {• I :: �,:� • : r` a 'mot � r ` �•, 1. •• `.nom T : �'�/ � f - ••�: �: • • � •"f l ° } tr � V � • `1 of : i • i :: � 1 � i- 4 IL o k �• • tl '� ••: :: :• :':• �: r.. r....:: :. � # KOHLMAN -AVE b ILL IJ C Z 7 66f L lei i� t 3x 11} �- tc Z ° j 1 C� 1 i "• i 1 � t t �7 ! so 1 p ommmmomommumaw Qum now � .. 9 e Map 2 PRO PERTY LINE MAP English Street Right -of -Way ••$r Pro Af to be Improved Property ted •. r ti:4• titirf 4 N RH SC Jinterchan ci al arterial .4intercha VaAnais C7 =. Ma collector T A&MW 9 91"014 WWWWON", Ot La 11. L minor arterial Os R rn u R 0 i1 1A s C ic LAJ Ll u-3 --1 minor art iaV L3 L:3 IA . I %- R 1 . U LSC M R I .0s. p r - -- -- •- r, C L Os Z S LSI, RI p Os Rm R h . "'" ow. l or CnIlurtrp, intprrhan a i n t e rc h i n g .e- Mme. major-Artel',al interchan p= L LL-L fop ---I F L M— r O Hazelwood- rY 1 4 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer DATE: January 27, 1982 SUBJECT: English Street North of Kohlman Ave. Street and Utility Improvements PROJECT NO. 81 -11 .Enclosed herewith is the feasibility study for the above referenced improve- ment. The study investigates the engineering feasibility and estimates the project cost for extension of street and utilities to serve two presently undeveloped parcels.. Since the developers of the parcels have not yet approached the City with respect to the proposed - configuration of the subdivision, we are recommending that the City Council accept the report and postpone ordering a public hearing until a preliminary plat is received from the developers, The configuration of the subdivision is necessary to determine which alternate is preferable and to determine the exact length and location of the proposed improvements . DJP /Atb encl. C / January 22, 1982 STAFF REPORT To: City Manager Barry Evans From: Director of Public Safety Richard W. Schaller Subject: Budget Transfer Request Proposal: It is proposed that the City Council authorize a budget transfer within the Public Safety, Police Services 1982 budget from Account 101 - 402 -4210, Fuel and Oil, to Account 101 -402 -4610, Vehicles. Background: The Police' Department is currently operating with five 1981 Ford se ans and one 1979 Buick as first -line patrol vehicles. The 1978 Buick has 96,000 miles on it and has a serious engine problem, limiting its avail - able use. We are in this situation because one of the new 1981 Fords was totaled in an accident in July, and because of the manufacturer's production dates, we have been unable to replace the vehicle. Within. the past week, it was discovered that one'of our canine vehicles, 9955, has the main rod bearing and crank shaft out and is unable to be used. The estimate of repair is between $2,000 and $2,500. Because the vehicle has in excess of 74,000 miles and already had one engine replaced, we do not feel the investment of another $2,000 or $2,500 would be in the best interest of the City On December 28, 1981, we ordered six 1982 Ford sedans from Midway Ford under a current Hennepin County bid for $9,290 per vehicle. Last week, Midway Ford was awarded the State of Minnesota-vehicle bid for the same car we ordered at $8,493 per vehicle. Midway Ford has agreed to sell us the vehicles for $8,493 each, or a $4,782 savings from our original purchase price. Reviewing our current vehicle status and in view of the fact that replacement vehicles for our 1982 models will not be available until April or May of 1983 it is our recommendation that we should replace 9955 with a new 1982 Ford by ordering one additional vehicle with our current order. The funding for the recommended vehicle is proposed as follows: 1. Money saved on current order $4,782.00 2. Money transferred from Account 101- 402 -4210 3 $8,502.00 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the a ove- propose budget transfer and vehicle purchase. RWS:js Action by Council: cc Lieutenant Cusick Finance Director M. ��...._ .......... Vehicle File Budget Fit maw r� MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat LOCATION: 2830 Keller Parkway Action by Cot -� � L APPLICANT: Richard J. Anderson OWNERS: Richard J. Anderson and Frank Frattalone r - 95 Gervais Overlook PROJECT: DATE: December 29, 1981 _ ...- SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL Approval of a preliminary plat for twenty detached single - dwelling homes CONCLUSION Analysis Several neighboring property owners have expressed concern that development of this site will intensify local water problems. On the contrary, local flooding and drainage concerns are being addressed by the - provision of an on - site storm water retention pond. This pond will also serve as an integral part of the County Ditch seven improvement ;project, scheduled for construction in the summer of 1982. The property owner to the north, Sanford Brink, is concerned that the proposed development would eliminate the future development of the southern portion of his property.. (See Map two.) Little Canada reviewed the issue on December 9, 1981. Their response (enclosed letter) was that Mr. Brink would have to pay any costs that would accrue to Little Canada to develop an access feasibility study. To date, Mr. Brink has not contacted Little Canada to initiate such a study. Staff is opposed to creating a border street, requiring cooperative construction, maintenance and billing agreements between the two cities to provide Mr. Brink the opportunity to create only four lots. Since so few potential lots are involved, and it is in the public good to avoid the creation of border streets wherever possible, the issue should be settled between the two land owners. The applicant has offered to purchase the 500 by 150 foot parcel. Mr. Brink was not interested. The applicant has also offered to allow for a north -south street access to this property. In so doing, the applicant would lose one l and add 180 feet of nonbenef i ti ng street and utility improvements to 'his plat. Mr. Brink's response was to compensate the applicant for only the loss of one lot, expecting the applicant to extend the improvements at his own expense. The applicant declined the compensation proposal. Furthermore, the applicant has complied with Staff's request to extend proposed Beam Avenue to provide access to the landlocked parcel abutting , to the east. MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Communi ty Development SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat LOCATION: 2830 Keller Parkway APPLICANT: Richard J. Anderson OWNERS: Richard J. Anderson and Frank Frattalone PROJECT: Gervais Overlook DATE: December 29, 1981 SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL Approval of a preliminary plat for twenty detached single-dwelling homes CONCLUSION Analysis Several neighboring property owners have expressed concern that development of this site will intensify local water problems. On the contrary, local flooding and drainage concerns are. being addreb.- by the - provision of an on -site storm water retention pond. This pond will - also, serve as an integral part of the County Ditch seven improvement project, scheduled for construction in the summer of 1982. The property owner to the north, Sanford Brink, is concerned that the proposed development would eliminate the future development of the southern portion of his property. (See Map two.) Little Canada reviewed the issue on December 9, 1981. Their response (enclosed letter) was that Mr. Brink would have to pay any costs that would accrue to Little Canada to develop an access feasibility study. To date, Mr. Brink 'has not contacted Little Canada to initiate such a study. Staff is opposed to creating a border street, requiring cooperative construction, maintenance and billing agreements, between the two cities to provide Mr. Brink the opportunity to create only four lots. Since so few potential lots are involved, and it is in the public good to avoid the creation of border streets wherever possible, the issue should be settled between the two land owners. The applicant has offered to purchase the 500 by 150 foot parcel. Mr. Brink was not interested. The applicant has also offered to allow for a north -south street access to this property. In so doing, the applicant would lose one lot and `add 180 feet of nonbenef i ti ng street and utility improvements to 'his plat. Mr. Brink's response was to compensate the applicant for only the loss of one lot, expecting the applicant to extend the improvements at his own expense. The appl i cant declined the compensation proposal. Furthermore, the applicant has complied with Staff's request to extend proposed Beam Avenue to provide access to the landlocked parcel abutting the east. Recommendation I . Approval of the preliminary plat, subject to complying with the following conditions before final plat approval: 1. Remedial soils measures, based upon soil boring data and analysis, shall be submitted to the City BLfiIding Official for approval. These measures must provide that the lots proposed in areas with unstable soils can meet building code requirements, 2. Council awarding a construction contract for the extension of sanitary sewer to the site. 3. Final grading, drainage, and utility plans shall be approved by the .Director of Public Works These plans shall include, but not be limited to, the provision for all drainage to be directed to the interior of the plat. 4. The City of Little Canada ordering the extension of water to the site. 5. A signed developer's agreement, with the required surety, is submitted to the Director of Public Works for public improvements, including a temporary cul -de -sac for proposed Beam Avenue. 6. Dedication of 30 foot wide storm sewer easements, centered on the following lot lines: a. the north line of lot fourteen b. the south line of lot eight, and c. the northeast l i n e of lot six. 7. Submission of an erosion control plan, before building permits are issued, which considers the recommendations of the Soil Conservation Service. 8. Payment of deferred water assessments. 9. The name "Block 2" is to be placed on the lots located south of proposed Beam Avenue. 10. Correction of the map scale reference. 1:200 is not correct. II. Counci 1 ordering a feasibility study for the extension of sanitary sewer to the applicant's property. The applicant shall pay for this study. -2- BACKGROUND Site Description 1 Gross acreage: 8.56 2. Net acreage: 6.74 3. Existing land use: single-dwelling home 4. The site consists of six platted lots. Surrou La Uses , Northerly: single-dwelling homes on larger lots in Little Canada. This land is zoned and planned for single-dwelling residential. Easterly: a fourteen acre landlocked, undeveloped parcel. Southerl undeveloped rear portions of a large, irregularl shaped single- family lots fronting on Keller Parkway and the proposed Ramsey County Ditch seven pond area. f Westerly: three single-family lots , two of which are developed, and Arcade Street. Across Arcade Street are single- dwelling homes and Gervais Lake, all in Little Canada. Past Actions December 1, 1980: The Planning Commission considered a lot division proposal which would have created three parcels without frontage to a dedicated and maintained public street. (See Map Four) Denial was recommended on the basis that: 1. There appear to be other options available for better development of this area. 2. The proposal is not consistent with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. 3. Once the driveway would be developed, it would be difficult to upgrade it to a City street with City sewer and water and assess this upgrading. 4. A hardship has not been demonstrated to exist which is unique to t h i s property. The applicant withdrew the proposal prior to City Council consideration. DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS Planning I. Land Use Plan designation: RL, Residential Lower Density. _ 2. Zoning: R -1, Residence District (single-dwelling) 3 3. Proposed density: 12.2 persons /net acre 4. .Permitted density: 14 persons /net acre 5. Compliance with Land Use Laws: a. Section 1006 (c) of the Platting Code states that: "Before any preliminary plan is approved by the City Council under this chapter, the information furnished with said plan must show con- clusively that the area proposed to be subdivided is drai nabl a and that the land is of such nature as to make its intended use practical and feasible. If these features are not apparent, the owner shall be required to enter into an agreement guaranteeing that all adverse conditions will be corrected and *that drainage will be accomplished in a satisfactory manner. The final decision in this matter shall be made by the City Council acting upon the advice and recommendation of its engineer and other authorized representative." b. The plat is consistent with the DNR shorel and development guidelines adopted by the Council on October 15, 19810 c. The plat is consistent with City Platting requirements. Public works 1. ;Sanitary sewer and water main are not adjacent to the proposed plat. Extension of the Maplewood sanitary sewer system from Kohlman Lane and Keller Parkway is required. Extension of the Little Canada water system is required. 2. Storm drainage facilities must be provided-with the plat. The pond on this site will serve a dual function: a. storm water control for the plat, and b. sedimentation control for County Ditch seven storm water, prior to discharge to the proposed Ramsey County Open Space land located to the southeast of the plat. These improvements would prevent flooding and protect water quality. (See Other Agencies Ramsey County Public Works for County Ditch seven information.) 3. Soil borings and analysis will identify remedial measures for building sites, This includes such items as high water table or insufficient bearing capacity. 4. According to the City's Transportation Plan, Keller Parkway is adequate for the current traffic. The proposed plat will have little impact on the traffic situation. Financial A deferred water assessment (project #75 -16) must be paid prior= to the approval of the final plat. 4 Other Agencies 1. The Soil Conservation Service: Development of the Hayden-Kingsley soil area located at the plat's eastern edge (See Map Seven) could result in erosion and resultant sedimentation of the wetland east of the proposed .plat area. Sedimentation of this wetland would in affect reduce its flood storage capacity which in turn will affect the hydrology of Gervai s Lake. The Hayden - Kingsley soils forming a ridge of approximately twenty feet in height, are subject to ,side slope seepage, They are otherwise suitable for development. Fourteen lots are proposed for development on Seel eyvi 1 l e muck, which presents severe limitations to development. This soil is unstable to foundations and streets and the water table is near the surface, , if development does occur, all organic soil should be removed, replaced with sui tabl a fill sufficient to raise the soil level above the water table, and allowed to settle _ before construction beings . Subsurface drainage will be moving toward Gervai s Lake and w i l l need to be given particular attention. Hones with basements are not recommended. For on -site erosion control, the following procedures are recommended: a. Grading be done during the dry season. b. A filter blanket and sediment dike be established adjacent to the on- site wetland. c. The existing wetland to the southeast should be cut off from Gervai s Lake 1 andl ocki ng site drainage. Some form of temporary basin may need to be constructed to temporarily detain site waters. d. Grading of the knoll at the site's east side should progress from west to east to maintain a vegetative strip between the on -site wetland and the grading at all times. e. If fill is to be removed from the site, a gravel roadway should be installed to minimize transportation of soils onto roadways. JO All exposed soils should be stabilized as soon as possible by vegetative measures. 2. Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District: a. A District permit for development of the plat is required. b. Relative to Gervai s Lake, the storm water holding capacity of the drainage pond required on this site is insignificant. The basin's principal function should be as a sedimentation basin. 3. Ramsey County Public Works: _ a. Considerable work is being done to minimize the impacts =of storm water runoff entering the Kohl man-Gervai s- Kell er -Phal en chain of lakes. It 5 - i s extremely important the developer consider designs which do not in- crease the rate of runoff and nutrient loading from the given area b. Improvements to County Ditch seven are proposed for the summer of 1982. The project will consist of piping storm water south along the west side of Arcade Street then to a sedimentation pond on the applicant's site prior to discharge to the wetland to the southeast of the plat. (Map Five) An overflow for direct discharge to Gervais Lake would be provided to protect the applicant's site from flooding in the event of a - l arge storm. 4. Ramsey County Open Space: , Ramsey County will initiate condemnation proceedings in the near future for the wetland area to the southeast of the plat. (Map Five) County juris- diction of this area must be gained before the County Ditch seven project can proceed. Citizen C Of thirteen property owners suf%veyed, eight responded. Seven are opposed. Sanford Brink,the abutting property owner to the north, requested that the applicant redesign the plat to align proposed Beam Avenue with the Little Canada /Maplewood boundary. Little Canada was notified of this request. Little Canada's response letter to Mr. Brink, (letter enclosed) was that if he wished to pursue the issue he would have to pay the cost of the necessary studies. To date, Mr. Brink has not contacted Little Canada to initiate the required study(s). Comments from the eight persons opposed to the development, brought up the following issues: 1. The unsuitability of a wetland for development. 2. Erosion and runoff from the property, polluting the wetlands and the lake. 3: Affects on an existing high water table in the area, with regard to on -site sanitary facilities. 4. Affect on the existing Keller Parkway traffic problems. S. The effect of eliminating the wetland on the storm water entering the chain of lakes, in terms of flooding and cost of storm water treatment through the St. Paul system. 60 Whether the development will cause a need for storm sewers in the area, to be paid for by adjacent property owners. 70 The affect on neighborhood character, of twenty lots smaller than the present norm. Enclosures 1. Location Map 80 Letter from Little Canada to nnford Brink, 12 -17 -81 2, Property Line Map 3. Preliminary Plat Map 40 The applicant's November 1980 Lot division Proposal 50 County Ditch Seven Drainage and Open Space 6. Excerpt from the Maplewood Drainage Plan 7. SCS Soils Map i I9 VADNAIS H 61 H EIGHT b .... : Q EAM AV.E. Koh /man" / Loke �� Loka -�- ...�. 4' KOHLMAN AVE '� =�--- '' n► ROA J d = 0 �... j W V Q V 22 61 �� 58 1 Co. Ito-092 a vi I i J D J r � t • 25 D .: BURKE A _ I E Al X. DELM01yT �4 58 .SKILLMAN h � , _ G ERV AIS AV E. i 36 ` * D5 � LARK AVE. � J t� I COUN OF H z R0 r LELAN 0 25 o JUNC AVE . uR E KE P-' ELOR106 j C4 aN ELWO t _ _ S KILL 1!A J LOCATION MAP 4 N ! 1.11 a►{ 6 NOT A SEPARATE PARCI Ell 1111"111111 IT-11111 Fm � 2.24 ac. I �w Q I LITTLE CANADA 4 ?'2 1329 r► 2 14S'? tic s MAPLE OOD . AIX 10 14 4 � � t 4v ro . ►p Z.' • �., e d` PROPOSED RAMSEY COUNTY DITCH #7 4e ` ° mc o . - PONDING AREA AND OPEN SPACE `i K � f 1 , 2 � a ap Isom v b • 4 T � 1 PROPERTY LINE MAP , Parc 1 ' for which street access i s desired Sanford Brink s e o � 4� N 79 85 8 as 3 2 \ w B 0 m O N O .- Lr co o F— / 00 _ ill0 ' ttE--�1 U �f _ %p0 60 00 1 2 W 11 10 A- ` � Q 100 9 i 190 7'• m , 80 r ,180 Ja yam. Sao — -' 1 — — • , 0 / c 't ` �� 8 O 60 / 70 soot • 128 r 7 S po 1 _ 7 / ✓,� i i MAP 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT f . 4 N x ot, t> i q, c. plum AV& t • -. ms s, i - •+.fit �• ^. C ?to , ! { E 41- 1 ' 4 t L I Tf LE -NADA t • f:.•. - f O t - :tip •• = :: = ' =' :: •. -.. 1 . ? 4 arc 1 • 2 oo t / 00 , •�� .•::. (Potentially landlocked t • :• •:` • . •�• •' ::•!: N. �~•- 1 •: ;f =� : .: . . ...... . . .... . . . 5 t • :::::ti's ' •.� : ::: ?�ti i t i 1 XXXX :Y :� •::.� •.• •. ti' V. •:�� :•' : •.•:•:•: �. •� ♦ :' • �i i� •:•; � .• �: ��: :i .�r:.•� :l' ....L:t : }�.- :mot . :: Count Di tch #7 :: :: :• ::...:.::.:. L, Proposed Y d' • C; • :ti : alt• =� .. :.: • •.�' � . R tz > .;ti:;�:..:.::ti•.:= : y y ::::: =� Pond ng Area Ramsey County .a � r' a c' e" 25 :� - �� • - :;a;:' :a =: =:;: � � _ - - GERVAIS LAKE f� 1 r �.2p o f r _ •b : 0 waft ♦ tee• M' � MAP 4 THE , APPLICANT' S NOVEMBER 1980 PROPOSAL 4 N AR rl I Ar E64 00' x O le 0- IV I "S4 Of. .01 1 .0 < w oo" 64 5 -f.- '7 X 0- N6 Ll 7- � L tAwt4rr ofeatJ CPMC44 07 Fwb) AL� wor-4&V P14 pokki J, 71. ~7 Ell, Aw /* 0 400 1 aw I I - MAP 5 COUNTY DITCH SEVENDRAINAGt AND OPEN SPACE PROPOSAL I 4 DRAINAGE PLAN ... . : KOHLMAN LAKE r. M AJOR WATERSHED DIVIDE INTERIOR WATERSHED DIVIDES 4 =: PROPOSED STORM SEWER 2 " ;r EXISTING STORM SEWER OPEN CHANNEL ••• STORM WATER STORAGE AREA INUNDATION AREA STORAGE AREA VOLUME DISCHARGE IN CFS - - •:• J CITY LIMITS O 400 800 1200 SCALE IN FEE 7 •• 1 •� 1 .................... ................................ • w • • • • • • .. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • . • • • s • • • . • • • . • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ••••••• . • . • • • • • •• • • • • • •••••• •••.••• ••••• ••.•••••••••••••••.•.• � •� •••••••.• ••. •••••••••••• •• • • t f 0�1/ MAP 6 EXCERPT FROM MAPLEWOOD DRAINAGE PLAN 4 N • 1p / HOC ! cu /* G�O i t 1 12 Q 100 t o Lr --- -L - - -� `t 1/4 i 80 � � 1 % 5 �- t 1 TQ 1 � r • O ' 1 _ s a 85 as ...,` X15 0 . 3 2 �` O B K p 1 .� ! A A O 1 85 5 . l w � VE N\j U ' l op ^--- i 100 so 00 i s j, 0 (� i 100 , // O son —;/ A 9D X. MAP 7 EXCERPT FROM SCS' s SOILS REPORT 4 N i� NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. December 17, 1981 Mr. Sanford Brink 2926 LaBore Road Little Canada, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Brink: The City of Maplewood has recently asked the Little Canada City Council to comment on a preliminary plat which has been proposed by Mr. Richard Anderson. Since the property in question abuts the south side of your prop located P Y on LaBore Road, it is understandable that you would be concerned with its development. The City Council has directed our office as the City's planning consultants, P g ul to ts, inform nform i that they are willing to review alternative roadway schemes for the area n quests on, but feel it would be inappropriate to spend City tax dollars to resolve one property owner's concerns. Past policy has been that potential beneficiaries of such City action should be responsi.bl a for the costs of the necessary study. Based upon this policy, you are advised that if you are interested in having the City study this issue, a request to. the City Co u nc i 1 is required on your part, , Please contact Joe Chl ebeck at City Hall ( 484-2177) i f - ou wi Y y sh to be placed on some future Council meeting agenda. If you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to contact our office (925 -9420) at any time. Sincerely, NO THWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. Senior Planner BJN /nd cc: Little Canada City Council ' Joe Chlebeck C1 a ton Parks andy Johnson - Maplewood 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925 -9420 b. the south l i n e of lot eight, and c. The northeast line of lot six. 7. Submission of - an erosion control plan, before building permits are issued, which considers the recommendations of the Soil Conservation Service. 8. Payment of deferred water assessments. 9. The name "Block 2" is to be placed on the lots located south of proposed Beam Avenue. 10. Correction of the map scale reference. 1:200 is not correct. Commissioner Hejny seconded Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl , Barrett, El l efson, Fischer, Hejny, Howard, Ki shel , Pel 1 i sh, Prew, Sl etten, Whitcomb. C. Annual Report The Commission requested the annual report be forwarded to the City Council for consideration. D. Rules of Procedure The Planning Commission reviewed the Rules of Procedure, suggested suggested variances changes and asked staff revise the Rules and forward copies to the Commission. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission adopt the revised Rules of Procedure. Commi ssi oner Whitcomb seconded Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl , Barrett, E1 l efson, Fischer, Hejny, Howard, Ki shel , Pel l i sh, Prew, Sletten, Whitcomb E. Met Council Review of Plan Update The Commission reviewed the comments made by the Metropolitan Council on the Maplewood Plan Update. The Commission suggested a statement be prepared to give to the Physical Development Committee regarding their comments . 99 OLD BUSINESS 104! - COM14I SSION PRESENTATIONS A. Council Agenda 11, STAFF PRESENTATIONS 12. ADJOURNMENT Fleeting adjourned at 9:25 P.M. 4 1 -4 -82 5. Staff take into account the need for a pondi ng area on the applicant's property if and when a request for lot subdivision is made. Commissioner Prew seconded Ayes - Commissioners Axdahl , Barrett, El l efson, Fischer, He jny, Howard, Ki shel , Pel l ish., Prew, Sl etten, Whitcomb B. Preliminary Plat - Gervai s Overlook Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting a preliminary plat for twenty single- dwelling homes. Staff is recommending approval as outlined in their report. Richard Anderson, 2830 Keller Parkway, said he did talk to the City of Little Canada regarding extension of City water into the property. The sewer is adequate to be extended to service the property. The Commission discussed the location of the Maplewood water lines in the area. The applicant commented on the types of soils within his plat. He said some soil borings had been done on the property. Commissioner Ki shel -moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of the preliminary plat for Gervais Overlook subject to: 1. Remedial soils measures, based upon soil boring data and analysis, shall be submitted to the City Building Official for approval. These measures must provide that the lots proposed in areas with unstable soils can meet b u i l d i n g code requirements . 2. Council order a feasibility study for the extension of sanitary sewer to the applicant's property. The applicant shall pay for this study. Council f awarding a construction contract for the extension of sanitary sewer to the site. . 3. Final grading., drainage, and utility plans shall be approved by the Director of Public Works. These plans shall include, but not be limited to, the provision for all drainage to be directed to the interior of the plat. 4. The City of Little Canada ordering the extension of water to the site. 5. A signed developer's agreement, with the required surety, is submitted to the Director of Public Works for public improvements, including a temporary cul -de -sac for proposed Beam Avenue. 6. Dedication of 30 foot wide storm sewer easements, centered on the following lot lines: a. the north line of lot fourteen 3 1 -4 -82 1 A: S 1 MEMORANDUM To: Barry Evans, City Manager ' From: Robert D. Ode 9 ard, Director of Community Servi cep Date: December 30:, 1981 Subs Park Availability Charge on Commercial and Industrial Property - Ordinance #400 The Maplewood Park and Recreation C.ommi ssi on discussed. the commercial and industrial Charges for neighborhood parks. It was apparent that the 3� of market value presently charged b y the City of Maplewood since the acceptance of the ordinance in 1976 has not kept pace with the other suburban communities: that are receiving as high as 10% of market value. Motion made b y Christianson to increase the commercial and industrial proper - ty fee from 3� of market value to 5% in 1982 and. to increase the change by the minimum of 1 % per year to a maximum of 10%. ' g i mum be placed It i s also recommended that a $15,000 per acre max p on park availability charges on commerci and industrial proper- ty. Ayes: All ; Moti passed. 4r#_ • N ( i t ► V 7 T.�i7 =d i/ fir• � V ' f t MEMORANDUM To Park and Recreation Commission Members Robert D. Ode ard, Director of Community Services From: 0 9 Date: December 18 1981 . Subject: Park Availability Charge on Commercial and Industrial Property - Ordinance #400 Please find enclosed a copy of Ordinance #400 which was passed by the Council on Jul 22 1976. • You will note that this ordinance does City y not require an annual resolution stating charges for commercial and industrial al P P y ro ert as does the ordinance for park acquisition and de- _ velopment costs paid by *residential developers In contacting other communities as to their industrial property charges, two P hrases are expressed: Assessed Valuation; Market Value. Assessed valuation of land is the value established by the Tax Asses - sor's Departments Over the past few years valuation has increased but it* is still less than the full value of the prop e rt y. Market value of the property is the value that has been established by appraisals sal s or b y negotiation between the owner and the City Council. PP 9 Where appraisers have been required to establish the market value, the ousts have been assumed by the developer. (See Section 6 of Maplewood Ordinance #400) The following information i f rmation was by personal phone calls or from information that was provided from other communities. win suburban communities do not have park acquisition The fol l o g isition and development ordinances because they were sufficiently built up at the P si time that the s method of funds ng park acquisition and development was started. To require only a few homesi tes to contribute to the develop- ment of local parks and not place a charge upon other previous develop- ers was considered unfair. - New Brighton, Brooklyn Center, Roseville and North St. Paul. _ The fol l owi.n 9 communities have Park A v a i l a b i l i t y Charges on commercial and industrial property: 1 ) Plymouth - 10% of assessed val uati on or 10% of 1 and 2 Cottage Grove - $500 per acre al though the Council has the option of waiving this charge. (The Council has been seek- ing industry and therefore has not been making the charge) . 3) Shoreview - 10% of fair market value 4 Maple Grove - 5% of gross land area or an equal amount in cash (This i s basically 5% of fair market value) . 5 ) Brooklyn Park - 10% of assessed value of land not to exceed Y $15,000 per acre 6) Little Canada -. 10% of fair market value 7 White Bear Tw . - 10% of fair market value as expressed n their subdivision ordinance 8 Mounds View - 10% of assessed value of land 9 Oakdale - 10% of land area or equivalent cash 10i Woodbury - 10% of fair market value of land 11) Eden Prairie - $1400 per acre 12 Maplewood - 311% of market value in cash or I n l and area j From the athered information it would appear that the majority nf com- 9 muni ties are now charging 10% of either the fair market v alue or 10% of the assessed value. Enc. (1) , r • ORDINA14CE We 400 AN ORDINJLNCE AMENDING THE MA.PLEWOOD V CODE BY ADDING SECTION 213 PROVIDING FOR PARK AVAILABILITY CHARGE ON COM-- MERCIAL &D INDUSTRIAL PR4PERTT THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: • Section 1. 213.010. PURPOSE AND INTENT. The ur P pose and intent of this ordinance is to assure the citizens of the City of Maplewood that additional o ens a playgrounds and recreational facilities will be th P P ce for parks, e responsibility of -every sort of new- development in the City, trot dust residential development, so that the City' present vast amount of privately owned open spaces with otential f : ark e P or development are partially available for orderly P recreational and open space development; and to insure the fa such facilities will je provided, and to reserve enha t in f P ace and improve the qual- izy of the physical environment of the City of Maplewood for commercial and Industrial uses or a combination thereof regardless of whether u rial are within the context such developments or subdivisions t of the .City Subdivision Ordinances. Section 29 2139020 That the developer of an tract P y t of Land in the City of Haple- wood which is to be developed for comnercial, industrial, or like uses shat •• to the public for public use as arks la � 1 dedicate P � playgrounds, or public open space, such portion of his develop tract equal to three and one half (3.5) percent thereof Section 3. 2139030. DELINEATION. OF THE AREA TO BE DEDICATED. The actual area to be dedicated for public use as parks arks, la rounds or public open apace shell be delineated on the preliminary P y8 It P ry plat or site plan by the developer and such lat or site ire plan shall be referred to the parka and recreation comaission for its scrutiny and report to the City Council its findings, conclusions and recommendations, this referral being in addit- 1on to any other referral to other co=issions or co, t tees. Section 4e 213.040. If the City Council after receiving Recreation Co�nissioa and the Pla reports of the Parks and nning Comission shall determine that such area is un- suitable for Such purposes, it may require the subdivider or developer to relocate or rearrange such area or to wake such changes or revisions of the r p oposed dedication as It deems neceasa ry, reasonable, and in the interests of the health safer ens fare and convenience of the City. 4W F, 8 ral wel Section S. 213.050. CASH IN LIEU OF DEDICATION In lieu of the dedication of land required herein for the purposes enumerated herein the e � City Council easy require the sub - divider or developer r to pay to the City as an equivalent contribution, an amount in a a of Land In c a sh equal to the product of the percentage required to be dedicated, multiplied by the undeveloped land value of - the tract to be subdivided or developed. Sucb cash pay- meDta shill be made to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit for Industrial uses or accomodation thereof. 8 p com Section 6. 213.060. UNDEVEL pED LAND VALVE DEFINED Undeveloped Land value as used . herein shall be the market value of the subject land at the time of the application a to be determined by the City Council in Its P ' nd reasonable discretion. As a basis for its decision, the Council may request an appraisal at PP the expense of the subdivider o - veloper for the purposes of determining u r de 8 s ch valve. Such additional_ appraisals shall be obtai if the Council deems it advisable from an • . appraiser selgcted by the Counci ti Thereafter, the Council with the aid of both appraisals ed lead value". PP sale shall determine " the "na- developed N I E . I , Section 7. 213..070* RESTRICTION ON USE OF CASH CONTRIBUTIONS, All cash contrib- cations received b the Cit pursuant to this ordinance shall be placed In a special . fund and used onl for the ac of land for parks, pla public open ppace, the development of existin paiks and pla sites, public open space, and debt retirement In connection .vlth land previousl ac for such public purposes. Section 8. 213.080. Proposed park, pla open space shown In the Covlprehen- sive , Plan or a Parks Plane* Where a proposed park, pla or public open space Is loca In whole or In part within a proposed subdivision or development such areas shall be desi as such upo the preliminar plat or site plan and ma be re to be Included in the dedicated.land of the subdivision or development re here- under. Section 9. 213.090. This ordinance shall be in effect from and after its passa and publication. Passed b the Cit Council of the Cit of Mlaple%..-vood this 22nd da .of July, 1976. IND. 4W do Ma Attest: -4t ' Clerk A 3 Na -2 RESOLUTION FOR ORDINANCE NO. 400 PARK AVAILABILITY CHARGE ON COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY WHEREAS it is the intent of this ordinance to assure the ci ti - iens of the City of Maplewood that additional open space for parks, playgrounds and recreational facilities will be the re- sponsibility of every sort of new development in the City, not dust residential development, so that the City's present vast amount of privately owned open spaces with potential for �devel - opment are partially available for orderly park recreational and open space development; and to i that in fact such facilities will be provided, and to preserve, enhance and im- prove the quality of the phys environment of the City of Map lewood for commercial and industrial uses or a combination thereof regardless of whether such developments or subdivisions are within the context of the City Subdivision Ordinances, and WHEREAS the developer of any tract of land in the City of Maple- wood for commercial, industrial, or like uses shall dedicate to the public for public use as parks, playgrounds, or public open space, such portion of his development tract, and WHEREAS the dedication.fee has been 3 %% since the inception of the ordinance of July 1976, therefore Effective January 7, 1982, developers of commercial, industrial, or like uses, shall be required to dedicate 5% of the market value of the subject land at the time of the application. ) zz� I S t MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Code Amendment: Plan Review Authority DATE: January 26, 1982 Council gave first reading to this ordinance on January 21, with suggestions for several changes. These changes are enclosed. Also enclosed is a resolution raising the dollar limit 'from $100,000 to $120,000 for new buildings and from $10,000 to $12,000 for additions. Removing the dollar limitations from the ordinance is cumber- some for the staff and public. They must have a copy of both the ordinance and a separate resolution. The resolution, since it is not an ordinance, would not be included i n City code books. Recommendation Approval of the enclosed ordinance titled "Staff Proposal." '� ►: - � 1� ~` { �.. ��- ... a ,.. �+. r . RESOLUTION NO. COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD RESOLUTION SETTING VALUATIONS FOR PLAN REVIEWS WHEREAS, Section 202.190 of City Code establishes plan review authority; and WHEREAS, said ordinance allows the staff review of certain projects, based on valuation; and WHEREAS, said valuations are to be established by resolution from time to time. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IS RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA that the Director of Community Development shall review all building or remodeling plans of $12,000 or less in value and all additions of $120,,000 or less, where the addition is consistent with the design of the original building and where the original building was previously reviewed by the Community Design Review Board. Adopted this � day of , 1982. Mayor Attest: City Clerk I STAFF PROPOSAL ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MAPLEWOOD CODE SECTION 200.190 RELATING TO REVIEW AUTHORITY ft THE. COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD HEREBY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 202.190 of the Maplewood Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 202.190. Plan Review Authority. 1. The Director of Community Development shall review all building or remodeling plans of $19- $12,000 or less in value and all additions of $199099 $120,000 or less, where the addition is consistent with the design of the original building and where the original building was previously reviewed by the Community Design Review Board. The Director must first determine, however, that the plans meet all City Ordinances and policies and that the proposal would not have an adverse impact on surrounding properties. If the Applicant chooses to appeal the decision of the Director, the case shall be sent to the Community Design Review Board for a decision. The Beard's dee *s4ee sba4l be f4fial, u0ess appealed to the E}ty Eeune44 by the Appl4east E4ty- Staff er Appeals from the Board's decision may be made to the City Council by any effected person within ten days after the Board's decision. 2. All other plans shall, be reviewed by the Community Design Review Board. The Board's decision shall be final, unless appealed to the City Council by the Applicant, City Staff, or any effected person, within 10 days after the Board's decision, 3. The dollar limits in this section shall be aRRaal4y periodically reviewed by the City Council, Mayor Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon passage, adoption and publication. Passed by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this day of , Attest: Clerk Ayes - Nays - IN COUNCIL PROPOSAL ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MAPLEWOOD CODE SECTION 200.190 RELATING TO REVIEW AUTHORITY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD HEREBY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 202.190 of the Maplewood Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 202.190. Plan Review Authority 1. The Director of Community Development shal review all-building or remodeling plans of $191999 er less lm value and all add}tlees of $1997999 er less where the add}tleR 4s eees}steet w}th the design of the erigieal bu�ld4n@ and where the erig}eal buildlsg was previeusly -reviewed by the EeRifbR}ty 8es4ge Rev4ew Beard- that are less than specified valuations, which shall be determined by City Council resolution from time to time The Director must first determine, however, that the plans meet all City Ordinances and policies and that the proposal would. not have an adverse impact on surrounding properties. If the Applicant chooses to appeal the decision of the Director, the case shall be sent to the Community Design Review Board for a decision. The Beard's dee 4s4ee shall be final unless appealed to the Eity EeumEil by the Applicant Eity Staff. er Appeals from the Board's decision may be made tp the City Council by any effected person within ten days after the Board's decision. 2. All other plans shall be. reviewed by the Community Design Review Board. The Board's decision shall be final, unless appealed to the City Council by the Appli City Staff, or any effected person, within 10 days after the Board's decision, 37 The dellar 14RMs le th4s seetiee shall be annually reviewed by the E4ty EeueEll- Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon passage, adoption and publication. Passed by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota this day of , a :s Mayor Attest: Clerk Ayes - Nays - MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Minimum Dwelling Floor Area DATE: January 27, 1982 INTRODUCTION On January 21, 1982, Council gave first reading to establish 765 square feet as a minimum floor area requirement for tri -level dwellings and rejected a recommendation to reduce the existing minimum floor area requirements for bi -level 1 1/2 -story and two -story dwellings, Alternatives 1. Adopt 765 square feet as a minimum floor area for tri -level dwellings and reduce existing minimums as proposed by Staff as follows (Ordinance proposal A): Total Floor Dwelling Type Foundation Size Area Bi -level and 1 1/2 story 672 sq. ft. 1008 sq. ft. Two -story 528 sq, ft. 1056 sq, ft. 2. Adopt a 765 square foot minimum for tri -level dwellings and-retain the other minimums .as suggested by Council (Ordinance proposal B) : Dwelling Type Bi -1 evel and 1 1/2 story Two -story Foundation Size 960 sq, ft. 720 sq. ft. __..____ Staff disagrees with the retention of the present minimum floor area standards for bi -1 evel 1 1/2-story, and two -story dwellings. These minimums are excessive in terms of: 1. the protection of the general welfare, health, and safety of the community 2. the requirements of other metropolitan area communities 3. floor plans available for two bedroom dwellings. Retention of these standards would also perpetuate an inconsistency between existing 720 square foot Gladstone 1 1/2 -story dwellings and the requirement of 960 square feet for new 1 1/2 -story dwellings. A second inconsistency would exist between a tri -level minimum requirement of 765 square feet in comparison with 960 square feet which would be required ` for a bi -level dwelling,, The tri - level minimum is based upon 'the existing dwelling at 2034 Phyl i s Court, for which a floor area variance was approved by Council. Recommendation Give final reading to and adopt enclosed ordinance proposal A. Enclosures: 1. Ordinance Proposal A - Staff 2. Ordinance Proposal B - Council 3, January 14, 1982 Staff Report M ti ORDINANCE PROPOSAL A ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 904 AND 916 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO RIINIMUM FLOOR AREA REQUIREMENTS - THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES.HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 904.010 (6) is amended to read as follows: (6) Minimum Floor Area Requirements a. The floor area of any detached single dwelling, here- after erected, shall not be less than the following: 1. A one -story dwelling: 950 square feet 2. A tri -1 evel dwelling: 975 square feet 3. Bi -level and 1 1/2 -story dwellings: 1008 square feet 4. A two -story d w e l l i n g : 1056 square feet b. Room size and number shall be consistent with Uniform Building Code standards . SECTION 2. Section 916.010 is amended to include the following new sub- sections: (20) Single-dwelling detached residence types are defined as follows: a. One -story residence - single floor 1 evel , usually at grade level. b. One and one -half story residence - two floor levels; one at grade and one above grade, which does not have full ceiling height for the entire above -grade level. c. Two -story residence - two floor levels ; one at grade and one above grade, both with full ceiling height. d. Tri -1 evel residence - three floor levels; usually one four feet below grade, one at grade, and one four feet above grade, al -1 with full ceiling height. e. Bi -1 evel residence two floor levels; usually one =four feet below grade, one four feet above grade, both with ful 1 ceiling height. May be on sloping lot with lower 1 evel pavti al ly exposed. (21) Floor area for detached single- dwellings shall be calculated as follows: a. The total floor area (using outside dimensions) of habitable levels at or above grade which have full ceiling height. b. One half the floor area (using outside dimensions) of habit- able levels partially below grade with full ceiling or habitable above -grade levels which do not have full ceiling height for the entire above -grade level. .(22) Habitable floor area - as defined by the Uniform Building Code. (23) Grade - as defined by the Uniform Building Code. SECi'ION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect upon passage and publication. Passed by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, this day of , 19 Mayor Attest: . Ayes - Clerk Nays - M S ti ORDINANCE PROPOSAL B ORDINANCE NO.. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 904 AND 916 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO MINIMUM - FLOOR AREA REQUIREMENTS. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1, Section 904.010 (6) is amended to read as follows (language to be deleted is crossed out, language to be added is underlined): 67- -R99M- SIZE - REQUIREMENTS: - -Ie- every- dwel4�eg- heese- hereafter - erected; there - sha14 -be -at- least - three- 44vable- Teems: -- The- evera4 -f4rst fleef- d4feRs4ees- ef- aey - dwe4 44eg- heuse- hereafter- ereeted -shaT4 eet be- 4ess -4e -area- thae- the -fe4 lew4Rg : 6. Minimum Floor Area Requirements a. The floor area of any detached single - dwelling, hereafter erected, shall not be less than the following: 1. One -story dwel ling: 950 square feet 2. Tri -level dwelling: 765 square feet 2. Bi -level and 1 1/2 -story dwelling: 960 square feet 3 .4. Two -story dwel 1 i n .9: 720 square feet. ne- 14vable- Teem emeept- the- k4teheR - sba4T -be- less -gip- area- thae -99 square-feet: b. Room size and number shall be consistent with Uniform Building Code standards. SECTION 2, Section 916.010 is amended to include the following new subsections: (20)Single- dwelling types are defined as follows: a. One -story dwelling: single floor level, usually at grade level. - b. One and one -half story dwelling: two floor levels; one at grade and one above grade, which does not have full cei 1 i ng =hei ght for the entire above -grade level. c. Two -story dwelling: two floor levels; one at grade and one above grade, both with full ceiling height. d. Tri -level dwelling: three floor levels; usually one four feet below grade, one at grade, and one four feet above grade, al 1 with full ceiling height. e. Bi -level dwelling: two floor levels; usually one four feet below grade, one four feet above grade, both v with full ceilin height. May be on sloping lot with lower level partially exposed. _ (21)Floor area for single-dwellings shall be calculated using 9 g e outside dimension of the levels: a. At grade for one- story, bi -level , 1 1/2- story, and two -stor y dwellings. b. At and above grade for tri -level dwel 1 i ngs . (22)Grade - as defined by the Uniform Building Code. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect upon passage and publication, . Passed by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, this day of , 19 Mayor Attest: Clerk Ayes - Nays - ti MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development _ SUBJECT: Detached Single-Dwelling Floor Area -- DATE: January 14, 1982 INTRODUCTION Request 1. Amend Section 904.010(6) of Code to reduce the minimum floor area requirements for 12- story, bi -Level , tri -1 evel and two -story dwellings. 2. Amend Section 916.010 of Code to include definitions for floor area calculations and commonly referred to single- dwelling types. Problem The present Code requirements for minimum floor area are excessive relative to: 1) the protection of the general welfare, health, and safety of the community; 2) the requirements of other metropolitan area communities; and 3) available floor plans for two - bedroom single-dwellings. These conclusions were reached following a survey of other metropolitan area communities, review of building code requirements, and review of commonly available dwelling sizes offered by prominent metropolitan area builders (see reference section). The result is that some persons are being put in position of having to overbuild relative to their needs, in order to build in Maplewood. Proposed Floor Area Requirements The following is an explanation of how Staff arrived at the following proposed minimum floor area requirements: Total Habitable Floor Area Tri -level dwelling Bi -1 evel and 11 dwelling Two -story dwelling 975 sq. ft. 1008 sq. ft. 1056 sq. ft. 1. The tri -level dwelling requirement is based upon the actual floor area of the tri -1 evel dwelling located at 2304 Phyllis _ - Court. Council approved a floor area variance on April 16, 1981 to permit this dwelling. _ 2. The bi -1 evel and two -story dwelling requirements are based upon visits to a variety of existing dwellings. Scale drawings, as vi eweC from the street,' (Attachment A) were also prepared to assure that externat = appearances would be proportional. 3.. The 1h -story dwelling minimum is based upon the typical Gladstone Neighborhood, 1h story-dwelling. It is similar in mass to a modest bi - 1 evel dwelling, but smaller than a modest two -story dwelling, as viewed from the street. Objectives of the Amendment - 1. Allow a variety of floor plans for two- bedroom dwellings _2. Reduce the cost of housing 30 Assure that external appearances of new housing will be proportional with existing housing 4. Assure adequate internal habitability Past Actions 1. November 19, 1981: a) Council gave first reading to reducing the minimum fl oor area requirement for one -story single-dwellings from 1040 to 950 square feet;--b) Action regarding the other single - dwelling residence types • was tabled for further information. 2. December 16, 1981: Council gave final approval to a reduction in minimum floor areas for one -story single - dwellings from 1040 to 950 square feet. CONCLUSION Issues To establish or revise minimum floor area requirements, various factors which promote the public interest should be taken into account. Two such factors are: dwelling habitability and neighborhood character. Concerns commonly associated with neighborhood character are property value and aesthetics. Dwelling Habitability At a minimum, each dwelling constructed should provide room sizes large enough to meet bask human needs and discourage overcrowding. The Uniform Building Code would serve this function in the absence of more restrictive zoning codes. However, reliance only upon the building code would allow the construction of dwellings which may not be proportional to existing dwellings, Neighborhood Character ■ r f roperty Value The preservation of neighborhood character is a principal reason for the adoption of minimum floor area standards, in excess of building code requirements. It has been , commonly assumed that smaller dwellings, i ngs , among larger er 9 dwellings, could have the effect of depressing property values,. w Marlin Grant of Mary Anderson Homes, in his letter dated DeceOber 15, 1981 (attached), discounts this assumption. Secondly, a New Jersey Court, in 1981, overturned a minimum floor area requirement which was adopted on this premise. -2- The decision stated that: "that the size of a house "per se" has no effect upon neighborhood aesthetics nor upon the value of neighboring properties. P More important here, rather, according to the experts, were such factors as topography, lot size, landscaping, and the like" (see zoni g and Planning Law enclosure). _ Aesthetics: From an aesthetic or architectural viewpoint, some may believe that smaller homes among larger homes create an unattractive neighborhood. The -validity of aesthetic - related opinions, because of their very nature, cannot be proved or disproved. Although there does not appear to be any strong justification for standards greater than those necessary to guarantee habitability, Staff contends that so long as floor area requirements are flexible enough to respond to the size of housing actually needed or wanted by present and future residents, proportionality with existing dwell i ngs . should be promoted. Further, the maintenance of proportional external appearances is most easily accomplished by continuing the present system of requiring different floor area minimums according to the style of dwelling. Alternatives 1. Reduce the minimum floor areas as proposed 2. Retain the current Code requirements and establish 765 square feet as the minimum area for the levels at and above grade for tri -i evel dwellings 3. Adopt the minimum floor area requirements set forth in the Uniform Building Code. (If this alternative is chosen, Council should likewise reduce the minimum for one - story, rambler style d w e l l i n g s . ) Recommendation (At least four votes required for approval) Approval of the attached ordinance to reduce the minimum floor area requirements for detached single - dwellings, other than a one -story dwelling, and to establish definitions for single - dwelling residence types. REFERENCE INFORMATION Existing Code Section 904.010 (6) - Room Size Requirements - states that: "In every dwelling house hereafter erected, there shall be at' 1-east three livable rooms . The overall first floor dimensions of any dwelling house hereafter erected shall not be less _in area than the following: 1, a one - floor, rambler -type home, 950 square feet 2. a one and one -half story dwelling, 960 square feet :. 3. a two -story dwelling, 720 square feet no livable room, except the kitchen shall be less in area than 90 square feet," -3- Other Agencies State Building Code Requirements In 1977, Richard Brooks, Assistant Director of the Minnesota Building Code office, determined that based on Building Code minimums, a two - bedroom house could theoretically be constructed with as little as 493 square feet. A three- bedroom dwelling could be built with as little as 563 square feet. =Using these same standards, but in conjunction with a convenient, livable floor plan, the minimum square footage for a two- bedroom would be 624 square feet and 708 square feet for a three- bedroom dwelling, The source of these. revised figures is a report published by the Metropolitan Council entitled Modest -Cost Housing in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, 1976 Model Residential Code Recommendations In 1976, a Model Planned Residential Development Code was prepared by a consultant for the Metropolitan Council. Estimated minimum, adequate, and generous total floor areas are recommended on the basis of family size. The following table .illustrates the results: LIVING AREAS RECOMMENDED BY THE MODEL PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CODE (Square Feet) Minimum Size of Adequate Adequate Total Generous Tot 1 Household Total Floor Area Floor Area Floor Area 2 adults 475 558 592 2 adults + 650 715 775 1 child 2 adults, 785 805 885 2 children 2 adults, 940 1 1 3 children 1 Includes additional kitchen area sleeping area , entertainment area, and second bath. Source: Developed from Model Planned Residential Development Code prepared for the Metropolitan Council by Bather, Ri ngrose , Wol sfel d , Inc., Project Manager, Myers and Bennet Architects, Inc.; Ross, Hardies, O'Keffe, Babcock and Parsons. December 1973. Metropolitan Council Recommendation The Metropolitan Council's position is that local land use regulations and comprehensive plans should not specify minimum floor areas for single - family dwellings. It is their position that the Uniform Building Code provides adequate regulation. -4- The Metropolitan Council gives weight to this recommedation, by ranking applications for recreation and transportation grant funds. Of 100 total ranking points, two points are awarded to those communities who do not have minimum floor area requirements. Surve Metro Area Comm unities - Of the eleven communities surveyed, ten have minimum floor area standards which are less restrictive than Maplewood' s . Three of the ten rely totally on the Uniform Building Code minimums. Of the eleven communities, ten use the number of bedrooms as a basis for minimum floor area standards North St. Paul, like Maplewood, uses building type (i.e., 1 -story or 2- story) as a basis for minimum floor area requirements (refer to Attachment B), Home Builders Survey Several Metro area builders (Capp, Dynamic, Sussel and Wausau) were contacted regarding typical first floor area ranges for two and three - bedroom, one -story bi -level , and tri -1 evel , and two -story structures, (Refer to Attachment C for results). Enclosures Relative Mass Diagram Survey of Metro Area Communities Survey of Metro Area Builders Letter from Marlin Grant Definition of Residences HRA Recommendations HRC Recommendations Excerpt from Zoning and Planning Law, 1981 Resolution F w ti -5- 1 - STORY ATTACHMENT A RELATIVE MASS. 950 Square feet 24 feed x 39..6 feet' BI - LEVEL 1008 Square Feet 24 feet x 28 feet Present Requirement At Present 960 sq. ft. (First Floor) Grade • TRz - LEVEL 975 Square Feet 26 feet x 30 feet 2 - STORY 528 sq. ft$ 528 sq, ft, 1056 Square Feet 22 feet x 24 feet No Requirement Grade At Present 720 sq. ft. ((First Floor) z ATTACHMENT B SURVEY OF METRO AREA COMMUNITIES MINIMUM FLOOR AREA REQUIREMENTS (Single Family Detached Dwellings) MARCH 1981 ` 1. Brooklyn Center = - lini form B u i l d i n g Code 2: Brooklyn Park 2 bedroom 768 square feet foundation size 3 bedroom 960 square feet " 4 bedroom 1160 square feet " 3. Moundsview 1050 square feet for all single family dwellings i n s y 9 4. New Brighton - Uniform Building Code 5. _ Richfield ' - Uniform Building Code 6. Robbi nsdal a (Measured from interior of s trucuture) 1 bedroom 720 square feet 2 bedroom 820 square feet 3 bedroom 920 square feet 4 bedroom 1050 square feet 7. White Bear Lake Lot Size Floor Area 150 feet wide x 150 deep 1200 square feet 100 feet wide x 120 deep 1200 square feet 80 feet wide x 110 deep 800 square feet 60 feet wide x 110 deep 800 square feet 8. Woodbury 1 OQ0 square feet of habitable square feet, less below grade levels 9. Coon(- ds - .Rape 1200 square feet in an R -1 zone (minimum lot area of 15,000 s u&e feet). , 960 square feet in an R -2 zone (minimum lot area of 10,800 square feet) . 109 Oakdale Lot Size 10, 000 square feet 15,000 square feet 110 -North St, Paul One Story 1/2 story Bi and Tri -1 evel 2 story Floor Area z bedroom 960 square feet 3 bedroom 1000 square feet �. 2 bedroom 1000 square feet 3 bedroom 1040 square feet 1 and 2 bedroom 900 square feet 3 bedroom. 1040 square feet 4 bedroom 1200 square feet 800 square feet first floor 400 square feet second floor same as ona story 700 square feet each floor i ., ATTACHMENT C FLOOR AREA SURVEY - METRO AREA BUILDERS 1 story - 1100 -1200 square feet -- Bi - eve) 905 and up square feet = Tri - Level 1000 and up square feet Two Story_ 750 square feet s DYNAMIC HOMES 1 story 960 - 1040 square feet Bi -Level 864 and up square feet Two Story 725 and up square feet SUS'EL 1 story 2 bedroom 816 - 952 square feet 3 bedroom 988 - 1600 square feet Bi -Level 2 bedroom 894 - 1100 square feet 3 bedroom 1003 - 1312 square feet Tri -level 1003 - 1312 square feet two story 760 - 880 square feet WAUSAU HOMES 1 story 900 -- 920 a Bi -level 850 a (a) a trend toward if codes will permit --- ���....��. -- •— ----------------- Square foot areas calculated --------- - - --- ---- ----- ------- - - - --- - - -- as follows: 1 story . ............. Foundation size Bi -1 evel - ... . ......:.. main floor plus entry Tri -1 eiel ............ on -grade and above grade levels two -story 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 foundation size _ . nderson BETTER MC FOR BETTER LIVING MARVIN H. ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 2201 LVNOALE AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55420 One important item to keep in mind is that just because a home is smaller does not mean that it cannot be stylish or impressive and expensive looking. I am enclosing some exterior photos of some of these actual homes that we have constructed recently and have listed the addresses on the back of the pictures in case you would Like to actually view them. I am hopeful that these will be of in- terest and help to you in your deliberations, I also have most of these homes on slides and would be happy to show them to you at your convenience, if this would be of help and interest to fo �a fi PV) .4 e December 15, 1981 Mayor - John Greavu, City Council Members, City Planning Staff City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55169 TELEPHONE 661 -2661 Dear Mayor Greavu, Council Members and Planning Staff Members: I have been reading with interest the discussions you have been holding pertaining to the reduction in the housing square footage requirements within the City of Maplewood, First, let me compliment you for discussing this issue at a time when cost reductions in housing should and must be achieved. I highly encourage you to continue your discussions and to make sub - stantial changes in reducing this requirement._ I would like to give you some of our Company's experiences in this area, We have been building a goodly number of homes within the City of Minneapolis and Saint Paul in square footages ranging down to 760 square feet for a two bedroom rambler and down to 864 square feet for a three bedroom rambler. We currently have a number of them under construction, some of which are in very nice neighborhoods where homes are considerably larger than the new homes under con- struction. We have found that there is a great need for such homes and a very strong market, Mayor John Greavu City Council Members City Planning Staff Page 2 December 15, 1981 I should state that o - our Company is currentl no homes- smaller than approximately • Y t building an any 1 0 Pp lmately 1200 s Y • y mmediate square fee plans for doin t nor do we have within the Cit of g 5O on property We currentl y 1�Iap1 ewood . However I a Y own need.. and feel that such hou be allowable � m certainly to lnly aware of the b sing should.e to be y those that prefer to do constructed construct such so and have the property n which homes. Such a chap e y hlch to g certainly does not mean that each of us as builders are going to change the size of our our own current subdivisions homes in flexibility i ions , but It does allow us to Y n planning future subdivisions. more visions . If I can be of an help to You in this contact P s area please c t me . .4 P o f eel free to Sincerely, MARVIN H. ANDERSON CONST CTION COMPANY C � Marlin D. Grant President PIDG:p1 Enclosures rl =1 ATTACHMENT = D Do A. POW". 7 AM ............. .... ......... 4 B. E. -not, -W be a L= E-P f ig 8 � 4 A C. aw— jj I T T es of Residences - _ A. 1 stor residence sin Door l evel usuall at g rade level. B. 1-1/2 stor residence two floor levels; one at g rade, one above g rade which does not have full ceil- in hei for entire above- level. C. 2 stor resid6nce two floor levels; one at g rade, one above g rade, both with full ceilin hei D. 3 stor residence — three floor levels; one at g rade, two above g rade, all with full ceilin hei E. Tri-level residence — three floor levels; usuall one four feet below g rade, one at g rade, and one four feet above g rade, all with full ceilin hei F. Bi-level residence two Door -levels; usuall one four feet below g rade, one four feet above g rade, both with full ceilin hei Ma be on slopin lot with lower level partiall exposed. MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager �- FROM! Housing and Redevelopment Authorit y _ SUBJECT: Zoning Code Amendment - Minimum Floor Area - DATE: August 20, 1981 On June 9, 1981, the HRA made the following recommendations: 1. Commissioner Morris motioned and Commi ss i oner Br ant seconded, to establish the Uni form Bui 1 di ng , Code as the m inimum floor area for single-fami detached dwellings. Motion carried 3 to 1 (C ommi ss i oner J uker opposing). 2. Commissioner Morris motioned and Commissioner • s oner Fischer seconded,. that in the event the Planning Commission or City Council considers ' the Uniform Bui lding Code's floor area requirements to be too low, that 800 square feet should be established as a minimum floor area for all styles of si ngle - fami detached dwellings. Motion "carried 3 to 1(Commissioner J u ker opposing), ppos�ng). i S { C 3; f° p, e • ` t � • s CITY of A /0. 1: NI/ \T PLEO ODD r 1380 TRUS'J' Ax1: X L' L: X1:1 I'I.F1�'UO1). III \ � LSU'I;•� 55109 770 -4 S I IE August 17, 1981 T City Manager From: LeapleWOOd Human Relations Commissi Re= Zoning Code Am endment - Minimum Floor Ar At its regular meeting 9 n August 4, 1981, the Human an Relations Commission reviewed the st aff proposal relative to for single�nil ��.inimum floor area standards - fa y dt.�llings. Following deliberation and following a Presentatio on this 9 ctions were taken: subject, the Motion wa s moves b by Cods y Co � �i ssioner Bryant, secon stoner Fischer , to establish ea Building .Code as . a bush the Uniform standard for the min'_ area of Single family detached dewelli floor ngs. (Motion carried unanimou Motion was mov ed by CoxrUll i . ssioner Bryant, seconded Y Commissioner Fischer, that In the evert the Plannin Commissio or city Counci 9 - Code floor a 1 consider the Uniform Buil • red reguire:;ients to �e to o low, that 800 square feet should be established as a minimum floor r " - (Motion ca e f �l area for all styles of single detached dwellings - - carried unanimously) . ' MHRC/pw 1 401 7 NO i V A.A., 'We Wj 77 v. 19 . tv & •- V � W 4��°.a#x �t 7 - 2.02[1] Zoning and Planning Law 19S s pecial In at a rate of 133 units per y ear, and appointin a of the order b mvesti master to oversee the execu 0 0 1 in municipal actions and sittin in on public and pr meetin Open housin advocates have applauded the rul at the will stren the In and the reined y , ho pin that j ustice De partment,'s hand in similar suits presentl pend- in a such cities as Birmin Michi Yonkers and Dunkirk, New York; and Glastonbury and Manchester, Connecticut. Such a result, of course, also depends upon whether the Department of j ustice will continue to pursue these suits under the Rea administration. 2.02. Re Housin Needs [ 1 ] Minimum Floor Area Re Invalidated New Jersey High Court Overruling a 27- precedent, the Supreme Court of New J erse has held that z on i n g ordinances which re- q uire minimum floor areas for residential dwellin irre- spec of the number of occupants or other relevant variables, are invalid. - The co reasoned that floor area unrelated to occupanc not onl fail to ad re van c e- an valid police power purposes but, to the c tend to subvert the g eneral welfare b promoting economic se throu the a boostin of local housin costs. Home Builders Lea o S. J erse y v. Township of Berlin, 81 N.J. 127, 405 A.2d 3181 ( 197 1 9 ) . In a 1952 decision, Lionshead Lake, Inc. v. Township of Wa 10 NJ. 165, 89 A-2d 693 ( 1952), app. dismissed, 344 U.S. 919 ( 1953), the New J erse y Supreme Court had upheld a municipalit minimum livin space re on g rounds that it promoted public health b preventing over- crowdin that it protected propert values, served and that it pre- the character of the communit present deci- 0 es after the development of New J erse y s Sion., however, corn 10 lot** u I dicial polic a exclusionary zonin as exempuned b Southern Burl g inton Count NAACP v. Township of Mt. 30 ... .. ., . I _ ... �• .. p:. 1 �•. l� • ♦ [.' _ .• .wR �QS Z' �',� � .f. wi .I .-" w... ... '.a► ,{ � ...Y.. . AI Yz . .M -Yf •J� - . ' w .. tY - - a4 .. .: y�y!' � .. .. ..W y'�� . S . �,<.k : y,,, ,, ,�� � - ., ... �SS° • •ar.0 . �C . �-. . >+�'° '�r •. A` •'� y� ; � t, ' �• .+� ,w��•� _ ma ^ '< .• , Y{ �y _ _'•,;,, '. . �( � :...y`. .:tJY'.s.Pi'i�i �A1.._'-�. a. ._y� ..... �., ... .A�'.L_'�'�<..sf�ac!.R .. '�iW. .� yl .]. ,L..i.. ..r. �Yli�aar ��.fk ...w6f'-YL:..f .�M'lal. �.J'A.. ]. �i i.:���...'6- ''+3...d4.i1��.:��. in➢i.r. ., i_; °.S Yi�Si.' -�.� �. _'Y�G :P.L+M3P- '.r.�. f�.2w ?a'�i'..a t�!;��,1':_. .. y- '.1. "SS. �__f. a:} .1".•' �5+.. .�•�`{J �a::G "... Housing and Regional Concerns / § 2.02[1] - Y dismissed 423 U.S 67 N.. 151, 336 A.2d 713 app. Laurel, s .fi ate. ° _• `,,. event l and re- evaluates these factors un a diff , 808(1975), . , - ��, ,. preventio of overcrowding, the Home Builders reven - �• - . As the �.� . • u� ,� t� � � �� � .� � � ��� � �= • -- concededly 4 blic ur ose League opinion finds that this p p p b s • • • Moor areas are set ,.. .: '.e `"Lrr 'done is advanced only if um _ ._ •7Q.i1 L "� � tA •i',,�.r" = . 7G:.+ ° c. „ Here the 44a do between the space and inhabitants. ' range f rom 750 to • which r g rescribed um floor areas, M - - P 1, buildin M s t 7 • zone and type � ." :�� -� ��- � {�d� ���. 1600 squar feet, depending upon zo g w„ : p , were found dependin number of occupants, v x - a X but not depe g P t4_ se Thus, verinclusive and undennclusnve. us, the =r to be both o • d the I50 s uare feet um recom - a far exceeded q • Health Association and b the Amencan Public Heal' mended y r-r • ,i' .." 4•r -75e }: v= 8,', j'Lf _ -+y �" � 1G,•ys..s IUD for a s p erson livin alone but, at the same time, _ single m , g - � R= • in situations • p otential overcrowding ° ` <7 d nothing to pre p x e dl g P • rpt• • numerous eo le living together. The court here• �X .� s involving n P P ` g size which � T � � .�:�.: -�. � n of s� regul urn lot :�. <: Y also distinguis 4 f= . � r • for exclusionary ur - "_. wally subject to being used Y P - gh equally be - z althou . >s demonstrably advances the pub- less at least demo nevertheless P 405 A.2d at • li ght, air and o pen space. lic interest in securing g P i �, . a • -. `ry : ,.rt` 7 ,', ►'te L . ' "w � , s_ 390. he char- �: . �. � � � -� -� = •: As to protecting property values and preserving t 4 .•. • Horne Builders League r of the unit the court in - Comm L ' below and to • to exp testimony reasoned, with citations xp �'- - house p er se has no scholarly authorities, that the size of a p • aesthetics nor upon the value of r hborhood i effect upon ne ighborhood • important here rather, � - ther ac- } • prop ernes. More imp g g v ne t topography, lot rts were such factors as top • e � s .c ording to the exp..: size landscaping and the like. Id. at 391. - Yr- thus found that the ordinances mini- court having - Mx .�. The � ; ll area re uirements were rationally related ne i- mum floor a q - � • to the • . :� ��t 11 er to the revention of overcrow th ding 7 r P t pion o eluded that the reservatif neighborhood character, con T p K , tow economic gr g - _ ordinance was directed solely M A- .� : lit . Id. at 392r -93 Hence, the Y �_ i . tion and was therefore invalid. xK the roscrip • d to ; e here was P o rdinance four fall within _ wh i c h r at the outset: "If the Township "s -° y - Y� �_ -.Z s F e court set fort - • as to provide for u the a w P � ' : A _ • � �- sole purpose in setting p de to moderate • exclude lower or , more costly residences so as to r rw•. +tom ^UA " T • �r'Q . A`i# 31 �` a ^�l! CZ K ��'� - i cey, # r` k. wr.,,s •'+-r _II, !f: +f.Si_f•.RL�f.P`. 1Y vr '.wY ;~ t �,� ' • L.. �a�� .. r .�'" e .�, :'`sR ,!w• }-`. r` S e�..,'s tr :p q i - irs�ivsdP -, * i. -z.% > ..:u► . •.. • '. t �i'.`.:k_ - � �`. �: nC �.Y.. `�.�.. _. KL-,. - _ �t __ � tie• - �_.�IS. * 'fia- Fr� � - .^ ...• +,� .- �. • 1,,. .. wl ..; s . �, ..{: ��' G ..: ••-+! y � . ?` ^ft:. r46 - .. •-�� :tT " .. �.,a y.� . .�.. = a' � il.`� y �` .t .�. 1. :,.: ' . : p'„ •�.. � ��,+' ' <•1. S�. ' �� .�„+�•.+• •) i< ' ' ` 'S '. ,+ P•. F a' ♦ � .' '...w..s. 4H - � �1i!"_� � - , ♦ {��i� ,7fi• • � N tF - •'' �.� � - •tF '°S •`'q> (+� t+ :� � e ♦ � �4� yn``" Jy. .',. _ T � •t... � � i ,•' � i t+l �... � ' 'G ^ ' �z:.'.rrj •, iy ' 6 . - ' .. ' +� a�tM< r ` t,• . ' '�, •.L" �L 7 b',.- ,� . �'•".�^��. t.A y nil :. •�i. . *+... '^X `�, `!�j..,, e*y, ...,.� .. 're' ,�' it '! .� .+ �. �� �r� ♦ �i .\ .iP "'. "'•• �.t`�ta �.. 1�b .. '" _. `�` _ _s'S$7.n'� �' :� ..� ,. w.. _ - f6A' <� . ,,.'� . q.. T ,.+. r. _..- �^ . ,�. `,yt- x� .. .,,,,_�• �� 1S` � .. .rr.- .. a ...., t + ••.. -�1;+ ' sr -„!' c.•• ,S`- . ?. 't _r9'. ..� .y' _•. •✓ r �•eF •. .n ^,ti '•'7Y. ..�: •. X . - • .. �..Y a.-s .. . - �. - • , 1. . •ntl ; t' . �c'� y . - .. .6' ... -. '..- -..i �...,., '. - '�'''' .n,,,' '°�,4 � u `� " - - 4;= •., a_ "i�`Y' '. dr¢ -•, ,. r a : a • �A....:. `,"k-, r - ,. ,c i}+.:a•.. ' ' ! . , .: �,.,; - t,,.. .R"i' " � -. r, f <!_: � +" ,'tom' r,i • -`. _'�•. ):r�'; 4!•- �. "" -dF 1 - ... k° ,J= iY s 1_� sT,.. •yi .i �iJyR��� -. � � �� i., _ 'J,• - y''C�,�j. • Y 't�' �.�yy>��►�,}V ��- � � - - o•,..�. .�"rM'�'., OF WG a� `/v .' 'lw•- jf_ . •f^.l s i- .F • •!`].•>. b^'h lL ,�, `•>"1+" .'ry _'T ?^mot .w� r .'' • is �: 1`}�• y ,•� ic '4 '"°"' °: p;' - .. •�� y -`"'Y n ' '``ice 1.�•E�'-"y`,'�'• -,� � 'p _". 2.02[2] / Zoning and Planning Law <t s dsrect form of " mcome persons, we would stake down the _ economic segregation.... We have acknowledged that zon- {� ing restrictons and limitations may have some econo mic effect in elevating the cost of a house., but nothing in the Municipal Land Use Law sanctions such economic segrega- �{ goal. Id. at 389. - tlon in and of itself as a proper zoning " � � „ .fin. � ,.. •� . , .=3E -,- ��=' Finally it should be noted that, throughout the opinion, t p h court emphasized its view that minimum floor area re quirements, where based on occupancy, remain valid as a ,o .. A _ • ' means of zoning control. This is s ignificant, given the fact gl that in other cases inval_ ating zoning provisions as uncon- tsry� ^ has recommended "s ace per stltutional, the same court p p ` u� z occupant " re gulations as an alternative means of control. " •s ���_ See, � . . Kirsch Holding Co. v. Borough of Manasquan, 59 {` W`W�•�Z '. � ,'F: 6 •�.t r� .._te -.. - e� � •� � ' -^}mow ,�y�.:�r?: y0 , • c • • N• . 241 A.2d 513 ( (invalidating mun prolu- i ` • �`" ' � �a � � i bition of group rentals at summer resort); State v. Baker, 81 N.. 99, 405 A.2d 368 (1979) (invalidating zoning limiting �1• r. -- .ate single family residency to persons related legally or b i ologi- t ti• Calf) t ` : �t'e Rs - : - �i'F. � �' -�� . i '•'. _ rte Wt a- 1 California Legislation Clarifies Growth -� ana ement Issue ,r e ter+ Xt f J � Y z � "' - }` ` :w A recen Rem from California shows the continuing re- = onsiveness that state's le •stature to issues of land use management. 19 Cal. Staff., ch. 947, requires cites and r ,. + +�K r counties, in the adop of zoning ordinances, to consider the effect therefro n gional housing needs and to bal- K _ ance those re 'o needs ag 'nst local needs and capacity. -2, f }�f. Specifically here annual num cal limits on new housing p-s w:r units are ablished by zoning or i ance, the ordnance is re uir to contain findings as to th elements of pu blic x .Y we a to be promoted thereby which ustify the conse- uent reduction of housing opportunities m the region. rt ••a' � �r:� •� ,�'��',( �' +{� � t � �` pit. V F aN� - �•2 _•i , a _ . 32 Aw- ' ' .7��r 'T°£ � . X .?'.` Y , �°`�yitr*��• -r "" ''a^ �'�.Y.`' .i• �. {� ?r r a fir 1 ' °ra A . �" F>. :' afic s; � q ,Wc'• , - _ 'S : ,,,,� ma ��yy,�, : R ate• `' ;a�' ,i .� �v f - � . ! :..,�". :r••, ���� + x'b ar _ .f` ^�. • ic:: WB�` ` �• :� � i ><.ri "•s.� ;s. - s, ;'�i . ��„ . �, � - 1 4 F ' . '...'n�" "�' `K Sri' '.�•. r!i ) :Y' �•' 0 �S� a�. i f � ''1...: '�' ..`f' ��.• '• .h .a'Yt3. - .!e•, }}maYy rw`iar ..,••..: .'E• ..+. •''•... J. • .r. . i . r '� - � • r `. , ,r r. a •: . 'j ° r �. �;�� $t' - •? -^i f r� ' `V °•* "•79 "F.•^ •�Ar Y., � !t•,. ,`;• > d.:`.•,. 'Kn .5 r .t w ^• ^ a a ` �s• . + > ,Y �. 4 7: t. _ r.;l• a ' 3' "Wf Y yJ^ .r f ai � r ._� •. �. as. � -$'a �•ra a ��.. g '+1" vrr . "7•' a)• tea '¢r -a:4a •v Z ,� N•�.. �T^.' .'S ` C - yy .� � ''. - v:"`t Y� , ' ':. , a. . <. < fir• . ! :r -'.��' v Via" �� -.... 1tr e. •< „�; , }.` -� �•'��"'''7>• ?l :+rid'. o •. -w- -•� � 't• 'Yy a,e F'1 .tom -� ��•^ a -.:r ,�{� ��q� , -1• :.1. j�f r d �" �:. j• ASr �° i 'Il "/ �• 4. 4t i�' 3h>. 'i' g� J"`,. o "!"`•'.,. •sr.'� "� �a:. �';i � 'i •� 'rY .e, t 4.. �',it: • -. `+u.; n • �'S - `>. -*>. .:.,."L'�Y. � .0�,:.1 ' > ;a'S ! s•. 3'+. �i�:. ,r '���a.. )R:_ , t'3'.`�..:.w�. ':2. � is3 :••� -• r� ,d� � Y �c :31.. i � +} %!' +} � + � " �.•a k..i :r.� '4 '}' , a P g M �' . �. ' • °j... t - . f`��'. �i A.����Tyyy..� '�� • - :�•i ^�?�� x '71. • +�� 1r•� .n �. �> � • �. -+� . 4.. '.:. ..y. - �r"'.�` �rati>t i'W! '9. :t�±.. 'mil �'^s., -� G - J!: >� z , ` 'Yc�' ->' ..a- .'�,�• _ - �', � - +,.. >.> .5.:= . '�'�r• + r. .' ha :!' r` ;yw.: } d•'i!G �� �� y ey, '•}�O fq.�,�, � ' �� a, 3..:.• ,• t � ti d•'t, ��.ng" „7. rF� ,z. ... - dd�i�., `r9 'W^ ...,a sl:•- 1x - '>'� .` ig ^ •i. i • 1F' > ���..y .,,. �.�y ?a[u... �'r' {y�.. ,•{ k g. p �'...i S �i:� ...SZ� .'�. 4 ,t�.�. .7 • '- ! -t' ^.•"� "�. .p1. ' .o �F'.. p1K' . S � {9' � r t. . .r._. ,YW'"�+` },>�� � • t �'�j'f••;., "�` ���,,�:� 99� � yv� �^ �r�. ,sA' '.`.•.. � - +M ! +!,' 7 y.� pw ,) '4 t 4! _ ,� .? - j' ` .T ^. �"c�'�" .> _ '>�t•''.,dx� 'e `,+'OC'Q`'� - .i+,• r'!#t � 'fie Th �� 'y�FTJ•+cr . ^'�'•` s.:.'!t. �.. -.4 it 't.•r�S ra. � '� • .� _� '•`'! max. .xtd' � a Y•�. _ �• "� ��!. .}r ".iCrf,� . y���. '�.. k ..ty�. • :p •}c' y>� n < t } t• - •'w. 5. �::�.4;. a"+ �� �.+ �R" � '�^ �'( 17' : Iri� ' � •w ,'�.- i .1..� �r ,• ... N.'i .S`��• �.Vn •"' Y aM1 .' .T l' � r, •� • w •� wt �.. 'r•hb yµ Cyp� F M' ' w -� "moo '•.s���" .�C .,Y'.. _f. - -. .8i`7..�. iL n.. ff <r :"ri y�' SL "7��R� •.Y' 'i� �Sd''t 7rx .•'"+Y ..^' S '�•r_ �!'�,_,'�� hi7> -•�" ;fig -"��, f..'.r K,^ - `_ �' ,...p. .•�'. ' : ,+ �y� . � :'"' .ri , - , .: %i� • - .r - '`c. �i ^ '` . ' . a..?i ��,r..Ya.,. y' �. ,� ►.:.'.� - s. s - >e.ra+•0' +',.t:,. ��.,, .`e ' �+' n. .vN X ;:.� M'r'S`�{; d�' - .✓•ssiC :.'�.• Y �;, .5�. •�u ^ - te .ar`, .p��!�- � ?.t^t:•� F� -. �.= t: „>KJae� � '1. :l. +,�� • as^.r.�.� .w*^ 'A> r �- .s -,. ' 4 �s. �-g -E! Y - 4: _ ;K ^>.. .' +x. �b ,. #- '�� .r _ f• ,d 'n"l ". �y�. . t. ._'", 'k:• r•. ri a - rm t :. w . r.Wr k r ..t:, �+'I «1,.:L' .r.± t �-�"- � � �.� ' a.. 'S'd i3' °�"v 'w ,��"�., r y' w .'�� `3Y. '"'�Ir ,X" a} - 0� X`;""�•a7•X�.' `''� a- _ - ?{�ti - �+. - _.� .:.Y• ,jb.i 'y,. b. ,3ec -'A- - ••4r n . • t fir, -: z .d i, ..,w ,.0 .�" . :y . tr.� A �Fs�2 + L -,r, - s •t+,..,,m�` ,�y� ,, ,r ` -.. -,,. pw _ ,.k::: - • � u- y_, •t .•e �� :?'r.i� r: y �.. �. � 'a'• •y6 .�. 5.. :5� +�(��}i, N 'r,�,k�' p` � p +�t '�. - \ . r ..{ _ q �• 11t 'f .! j ` >•y '.a`� J }�_j � vY. ', PC'•� . & .[' � � • M y ,� .R •y��yw� _ �� �,r . d:. Z hl^' • t •g ••,+,"�. ..�. •�.. qp ... T y �1•ru., t - ..aY ,'Y. - _ y �.�'• r,r .,,y. "':� '�- - •'' `� t' •�'- t. .-. a '•i'� "`�•' a% . � L ,y�.? .S ',y.`1>•. � .. . l ,f7". '.b'�..' .��. �: �?' 7• '!if -' -s•�. .;;,i _ ^�:. vP: ,y. tk. r s . n .. ,.�' > a• �,{r C.'.': i ' . :i' _ f •s' ' r w »: �:••t. ��' a-x"k rc !a � - I`d�. :r,. `t' r;>x, r :9i '��.r'• .Y �r f� "Y .• �§�. , - ,'':. r.� a r "4Ti . +t p , a - � ,�• ��.. ;e.. a s+r Q `� 1 . r tom. �" ,� - • _ u • � . :. _ 0, c . -..- -. ..s. r -'.. ..-M.. ..�; - , P`• :� -'` A - �: �• .fi" =Y` bS. .:.J -.. � ,.r• � a., �'�r,,a' ".i »��'k 5. �. ? ^t,.� _. nA -•-a. - v '( - 'ei'. - .{'• ^'' � N ' .nf � �- a�+r , c a. ...r , � ..j •a. ,�' •. '., 1.1. _ .:7*- a - +� � '� ' .t� i. \.:1 -� . ."�W.. _ '{ •>.'Sr•' � �y � :i -D' .r �(P a • i �'�`. ,t y . a i4• - . Y ' t .t - " k . _ '*"� `!� 1j!.:: •�:� ..l ..�.F ..,,: fib,. ivs &:.. �?�',� �:+' r _ .."a•,' '.Y. �_^.2" ,; * .. "'ti `"^ 'eYt�� 'Y .a .••, .�a. � Y 4h �+ t.% ;%,�_;•:�::'. v.wrs y ' ... ->„ .• ',�:�' - wi,,:?y °,+ •£' - • 'h' ' i�+� ti • �t `•� K' �« --'�, '3"'..� .L � � �J�...' �,' ay, .,. - 'wM. - _ ^AC. t` - " y ,• yM + � , . .:� ,r.' ° .S .� w ' - `r°°. 'a - •'1 s .., 'S';; .n.y a - 'a•F `:�'!^3 .i.' - :1- „+' °•� � '.�• ..ir.O?• k' vC" 'R%- •�F':e� �� r^$ ,.`'tt'�-' .,.�5, .v=r d`,�,'s �� `.-� a.. �+ .;$s �( .,.>' .-fR. .rs �f ��°`. S+ _.;",�.` r''. z 'tie. ,+ i� :� »y ,.. � !. � e' _m!•; t �* -.0 ° " .:•4e .f •i�f' Y .C�'witY >' >L- Y':G. - t". , -•c y� ''.•w � � �#� ' a' 0� � �. c , • 1i . - r, . •�. I �� :J h ,. .F"S' -'� !� ,. , t. � � r•.rT��c . _ .�. T`•..a �-� L. z. •7•• v i �.: [ 0 .:7�� "Y ' : rt' "''><[ AU:: r" ,'I1, t�r� .Y,.:o ..;P . ..�' -'-� ° "'S�• c��.�.��. w al r }: r C Y�;' ..� ,D°i, tyy. •ds ..t',�. i p . " - '^"K . ' i r'"_ - aj v d, yy�� .>a � � � ,. .+ s� s .'ti S, ' pry. +M: •. :>� .s . +'. -�: .n -�.. • +�` '�� _r�,.. .1a '., )' '.L+ 54a ''�lf 1 Y- .$���" �1 ;.. •'�`. �'i:' '�_ .•w * =� ".1�^ - w• �':'"r;:r�, • .�fZ e:�':.:••. "',aSe �c: �}... T 2. .'k a .•,sr• ."X}a �."t�+n- .'•n :s a.c a .ik:.. •y)r'.Ja° S;•• a , r .}+, .R'.. ,r - •a �. _' 'K ' - rrst ,� •r '.. -x, tP?�t � :��iC .�w ~Y .4' W� �g '�.. t ._gtt RM" :? ..�. it b:- ,,♦ ,.�? 'Lc �} .,� •7A64':• sue-• +N• _.-r �. ,�.x• �� �`:..'r�• •"✓-e ! +":A•t•, a:, �,. } �`�. L '�+"c .� Ar.r. "�^ ,.fls- t. .•• r r'a'h' `�''" -'' - .1, ..fir•+(" ., ,,.J �1' # 7 • � Vii= . �.: • �� .�� E r � �+w:, ���,. � d' '' t «. �:'m;. • - o~ `$ � .t -'�.� - -•a i eJ- � MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Special Exception LOCATION: Carlton Street, North of Conway Avenue APPLICANT: ISACOMM Services, Inc. � -OWNER: 3M Company -PROJECT: Satellite Earth Station DATE: January 20, 1982 - W SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL Request a 2,400 square foot, one story building to contain Approval to c •, q • equipment for the operation of a 25.3 foot diameter disc antenna to be located behind the building. Proposed Land Use 1. Refer to the applicant's letter. 2. There would be two employees in the building when the facility is operational. CONCLUSION I ssues An industrial) zoned area such as thi one, without retail, commercial office or residential neighbors, is the most appropriate i ate 1 ocati on for this type of use. Staff, therefore, cannot find any reason why this use would not be compatible 9 om ible with surrounding development. Staff's only concern is over building si n. The building des however, will be reviewed by the Community Design de g 9 9 Review Board. Approval o t p p f he special al exce ti on for the proposed satellite earth station, based on the findings that: Recommendation 1. The ro osed use would be compatible with adjacent development. P P 2 proposed osed facility would not be a use which is noxious or hazardous P to adjacent development. BACKGROUND Site Description 1. Gross Acreage: 2.93 acres 2. Net Acreage (site size): 14.,450 square feet (.33 acres) The applicant is also presently applying for a lot split to create this site. -3. Existing Land Use: The northerly 2.60 acres of this property is developed - with 3M Building 252. 4. Easements: Northwestern Bell has an easement over the southerly ten feet of the proposed site. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Building 252 Southerly: Skelly Service Station Easterly: Carlton Street and Northwestern Bell Westerly: Vacated Evar Street and a 3M parking lot DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Planning 1. Land Use Plan Designation: DR, Development and Research 2. It is the intent of this district to provide for a planned and designed research and development area developed in a park -like environment so as to create a compatible environment with surrounding land uses. Most types of industrial development would be permitted, provided they are compatible with adjacent land areas. 3. Zoning: M -1 4. Section 909.010 (1.m.) of the City Code states that uses of the same general character as any permitted M -1 use may be approved when authorized as a special exception by the City Council provided that no use which is noxious or hazardous shall be permitted. Public Works Water, storm sewer and sanitary sewer are available. Enclosures: 1, Location Map 2. Property Line Map 3. Site Plan 4. Applicant's Letter of Explanation -2- "N ' Q= Beaver 0 MAGWOL - A AVE. CL Oil I or fib Lake z 0 69 L.-CASE to HARVESTER ci ASE- 32 '' AVE > 212 w LA. 'JARAND AVE. J:" 32 6-- D _: T. 7TH z E. 7 TM AvE T29N BUSH le 5130 R22W AVE. 3 R2tW x ' --MINNEMANA AVE.) X 70 - 34 E. MAROARIE I E TPA' JE - f- (( �' E S TM AyE 3 Rij [I [I U. [] 16 LOCATION MAP I� � 1 � _ 1 ' r t i BUIL it � #2� �' • t it I t t 1 } r� _ r k rw V �- o - r BU I DING #21 r r A co'7� r r y a_ �i r, r j j 1 it f r . M NOR ESTERN BEL _ tell � o PROPERTY LINE MAP f - N a • 1 � - s - SE TBACK GENERATOR !Y-d AREA 85' =C' 4or I BUtLGING � .o e r I SITE PLAN v z6 -- LAWN AREA PARKING s . AREA DRIVEWAY BELL EASEMENT d Q N r E APPLICANT'S LETTER OF EXPLANATION ISA Communications Services, Inc., ( ISACOMM) is a resale common carrier as defined by the Federal Communications Commission, As a resale common.carrier, ISACOMM does not own the transmission facilities but leases them and sells communications services to its customers. ISACOMM is currently in the process of installing 40 earth stations operating through Satellite Business satellite P Systems to establish a nationwide network for voice, high -speed document distribution, high and low -speed data, and video teleconferencing. The satellite earth station which we propose to locate in Maplewood, Minnesota, ota will serve Maplewood as well as the greater Minnea • polis /St. Paul area. The site on which we are anticipating operating center gives ISACOMM close proximity locating our oper g g to potential customers as well as necessary access to the Northwestern Bell Central Office servicing Maplewood. ISACOMM feels that the granting of the Special Use Exception Application for this location would be mutually beneficial to the City of Maple , wood Minnesota, in that it would provide valuable incentives to other companies or corporations to locate in the Maplewood area . ItA i MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer DATE: January 27, 1982 SUBJECT: Hillwood Drive - Dorland Road Street -and Utility Improvements Assessment Hearing Project No. 78 -10 In accordance with City Council directions, we have prepared a schedule for assessment that w i l l enable information to be provided on the number of assessment appeals prior to the award of a construction contract. As previously authorized, the construction bids w i l l be opened on Febru- ary 5 , 1982 after which the bid from the lowest respons i bl e bidder w i l l be used as a basis for the formulation of the assessment, along ith estimates of i g indirect costs for engineering, ng, 1 egal , administration strati on and fiscal expenditures. The assessment hearing will be held on March 4, 1982. If the assessment is adopted by the City Council on this date, the property owners have forty (40) days therefrom to f i l e an assessment appeal. On Apri 1 13, 1982 the appeal period will terminate and an analysis will be drafted for consideration by the Council on April 15, 1982. The Council can then evaluate the overall project with respect to the number of appeals and make a determination on the award of a construction contract. We are therefore recommending that the City Council authorize the date for assessment hearing on March 4, 1982. A a PROPOSED ASSESSMENT'SCHEDULE 1. City Council establishes Assessment Hearing for March 4, 1982 2. Engineer Opens Bids 3. Publish Assessment Hearing Notice in the Maplewood Review 4. Mail'Assessment Hearing Notice to Property Owners 5. Assessment Hearing (Assessment Adoption) 6. Last Day of Assessment Appeal Period 7. Award Construction Contract February 4, 1982 February 5 , 1982 February 10 & 17, 1982 February 17, 1982 March 4, 1982 April 13, 1982 April 15 , 1982 0 NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota will meet in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 1380 Frost Avenue, at 7:15 P.M. on March 4, 1982 to hear all persons concerning the adoption of the assessment .roll for public improvement Project No. 78 -10, Hillwood Drive, Dorland Road and Linwood Avenue; streets, sanitary sewers, storm sewers, watermains, and appurtenances, and to adopt the assessment roll as presented or amended. This hearing i s scheduled pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. The assess- ment roll as herein described is on f i l e in the Office of the City Clerk. Area to be assessed: Linwood Avenue from McKnight Road to the east 1200 feet; Dorland Road from Linwood Avenue to Hi 1 lwood Drive; Hi 1 lwood Drive from Crestview Drive to the west 1150 feet; Crestview Drive from Hi l lwood Drive to the north 200 feet; and that area generally bounded by Teakwood Drive to the north, McKnight Road to the west, 700 feet south of Linwood Avenue to the south, 1600 feet east of McKnight Road to the east All persons who wish to be heard, or to object, with reference to this matter may present their cases at this hearing, either orally or in writing. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to M.S.Q. Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk of the City of Maplewood within thirty (30) days after the adoption of the assessment and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or City Clerk. Deferment of Assessments: Under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 435.193 to 435.195 the City may, at its discretion, defer the payment of assessments for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. The procedures for applying for such deferment are available from the City Clerk. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota Dated this 28th day of January, 1982 Publish Maplewood Review February 10 and 17 , 1982 z In PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLLS WHEREAS, the City Clerk and .City Engineer have presented the final figures for the improvement project which consists of the construction of streets, storm sewers, sanitary sewers, water - mains and all necessary appurtenances in the following described area Linwood Avenue from McKnight Road to the east 1200 feet; Dorland Road from Linwood Avenue to Hillwood Drive; Hillwood Drive from Crestview Drive to the west 1150 feet; Crestview Drive from Hillwood Drive to the north 200 feet. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: that the City Clerk and City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard to cash valua- tion, as provided by law, and they shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the City Office for inspection. Further, the Clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. LA ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING WHEREAS, the Clerk and the Engineer have, at the direction of the Counci 1 , prepared an assessment rol 1 for the construction of streets, storm sewers, sanitary sewers, watermains and all neces- sary appurtenances in the following described area: Linwood Avenue from McKnight Road to the east 1200 feet; Dorl and Road from Linwood Avenue to Hillwood Drive; Hillwood Drive from Crestview Drive to the west 1150 feet; Crestview Drive from Hillwood Drive to the north 200 feet and the said assessment roll is on file in the office of the City Clerk; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLE - WOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 4th day of March, 1982 at the City Hall at 7 :15 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment.' 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners of all property affected by the said assessments. 3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time, and place of hearing, the general nature of the improvement, the area .proposed to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll is on f i l e with the Clerk, and that written or oral objec- tions will be considered. C L' _ s MEMORANDUM TO Mayor and City Council FROM Barry R. Evans, City Manager SUBJECT: Gethsemane Park Contract DATE January 29, 1982 You will recall that about two years ago there was some discussion between the City and Gethsemane relative to additional demand by the church as it related to their parking lot. The matter was not resolved at that time. I have recently had discussions with the chairman of their board. The parking lot i s no longer an issue. However, we had received notice of.their intent to cancel. They no longer wish to do that but would like to have the fol l owi nq changes: 1.. The present contract provides for deferment of an assessment during the life of the contract. They would like to see some date in the future when the deferment would be cancelled completely provided the land is not sold for non - church purposes prior to an agreed upon date. 2. They would like to have a provision which would permit them to use the land as collateral should they need a loan at sometime in the future. t , 1 / I Act.,.- -^ r 1 -r•. should wish to move its operation to a new location, either party may notify the other of the termination of this Agreement by written notice being given free (3) years prior to the date Of termination . 8) Upon expiration of this Lease, the City ill have ' y the option to renew for Five (5) year periods. 9) In the event the church desires to sell the property during the term f Pe Y q o__ this Lease, then and in that event, should the church have a buyer the church Ye , dull make known to the City the purchase price and teens thereof and from and after said notice the City shall have thirty (30) days in which to meet said urchas p e price in tens of giving notice of intent to purchase in writing to the church within said thirty (30) day period, In the event the City oes not so notify oti fy the church, then the church may proceed with the sale,, 0 Should the City erect any structure or buildings n p rop e rty, the City � P Pe Y. Y will have the right to remove any and all such structures and/or buildings �.rlgs within forty -five (4 5) days of determination of the Lease for whatever reasons said Lease is terminated. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this day of 1976. Witnesses: ' r GE"IBSEMANE LUTBERAN CHURCH A j T r us tee 7 0 b N c /�.�� G SE's Tres Witnesse C. THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 2 CAr, 1F B Its Mayor PO B / �- Itt Clerk e r LEASE THIS LEASE AGREEMENT is hereby made this 1= day of 197e, b y and between the GETHSEMANE LUTHERAN CHURCH, hereinafter referred to as the "Church ", and the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, hereinafter referred to as the "City ". WHEREAS, the Church is owner of the following described tract: Unplatted Lands: Subject to Highway 212, Streets, and flowage easement that part south and east of Centerline of said Highway of the Following: The NT of the SW k And except the E 156 feet of the W- of the S E1. of the N1 and except the E 156 feet of the N 453 feet, the W z of the NE k of the SW 4 of Sec. 25, T 29N, R 22W. WHEREAS, the City is desirous of utilizing the South 615 feet of above described property for recreation purposes and is agreeable to the terms and conditions set out herein. NOTr7, THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of One ($1.00) Dollar and other valuable and sufficient consideration, the Church does hereby grant to the City, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, the right to the use and enjoyment of the above described real property for .a period of thirty (30) years from the date hereof, and subject to the following: 1) The City may use the premises solely for purposes of public recreation or other community purposes under approval of the Church. 2) The City hereby agrees that it will indemnify and save the Church harmless from any and all claims for damage which the Church may be, under law, required to pay for injury or damage caused through the negligence of the City or any of its agents or employees by virtue of its scheduling of activities or development of fa- cilities on the premises. 3) That plans for any construction, fixtures, appurtenances or other improvements shall first be approved by the Church. 4) That the City shall coordinate with the Church the scheduling of activities and groups on the premises and that the normal needs of the Gethsemane School and Walter Jr. High be given priority during the school day, and for normally scheduled summer games and activities by the Church. �) Throughout the period of use of this property for the stated purposes by the City, the City will save and hold harmless the Church from any payment a ment of assessments for improvements or taxes on said property during said period. The City further agrees to defer existing assessments against the said property in the amount of �1 6) It is understood and agreed that because of possible special religious functions requiring reverent quietude as well as regular occasions of worship, the Church reserves the right to limit times of use of the premises insofar as such use might interfere i aforesaid occasions of worship and religious functions. t 7) In the event that at some time within the Thirty 00) year period the Church should have a need for the property, either to dispose of it or to occupy it for some other purpose, or the City